Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "llnl livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL):  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

IPO Fact Sheet Strategic Diversity Program Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) works with other national laboratories to coordinate and integrate programmatic...

2

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL): News Releases...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Trek: Into Darkness" (5162013) Renewable energy demonstration project (5142013) LLNL announces voluntary separation program (582013) RFI released for Livermore Valley...

3

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL): Business Opportunities  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

IPO Fact Sheet Strategic Diversity Program Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) spends approximately 650,000,000 annually through procurements to a diverse group of...

4

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites

Phonebook | Phonebook | Site Map | Contact Us Search LLNL Go KEY RESEARCH Ensuring the safety, reliability, and security of the U.S. nuclear stockpile and applying science and technology to anticipate, innovate and deliver solutions to global security needs. Weapons Program High Explosives Application Facility Site 300 Global Security Energy and Environmental Security Defense Intelligence Nonproliferation Advancing energy security in the United States through the discovery, development, production and deployment of cost-effective, sustainable systems while protecting the environment. Energy Technologies Carbon Capture and Storage Climate and Carbon U.S. Energy Flow Charts Hydrogen Fuel Geothermal Wind Forecasting Underground Coal Gasification Vehicle Aerodynamics Turning scientific and technological concepts into reality, whether

5

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL):Livermore Lab Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Livermore Lab Report News Center Around the Lab Contacts For Reporters Livermore Lab Report News Archive News Releases Social Media & Multi Media Livermore Lab Report A weekly...

6

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL): Photography Restriction...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Photography About LLNL About LLNL What we do How we do it Our Values Organization Management and Sponsors Publications History Organizations Global Security National Ignition...

7

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL): Prohibited and...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Controlled Items About LLNL About LLNL What we do How we do it Our Values Organization Management and Sponsors Publications History Organizations Global Security National Ignition...

8

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site Lead Planning Activities...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Report Number: HIAR LLNL-2012-10-23 Site: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management...

9

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: Site Map  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Site Map Site Map About LLNL What we do How we do it Our Values Organization Management and Sponsors Publications History Organizations Global Security National Ignition Facility Operations Safety & Security Science & Technology Weapons & Complex Integration Visiting LLNL Maps & Directions Badging Discovery Center Site Tours Current Weather Protocol Office Where to stay Tri-Valley Visitors Bureau City of Livermore News News Center For Reporters Social Media & Multimedia Publication Science and Technology Review Lab Report News Releases Around the Lab Community Discovery Center Site Tours Community giving Corporate giving Environmental information Community Center Contacts Discover LLNL Newsletter Volunteer Opportunities Education Internships Postdocs K - 12 Outreach Site Tours School Tours

10

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Experimental Test Site (Site 300) Salinity Evaluation and Minimization Plan for Cooling Towers and Mechanical Equipment Discharges  

SciTech Connect

This document was created to comply with the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) Waste Discharge Requirement (Order No. 98-148). This order established new requirements to assess the effect of and effort required to reduce salts in process water discharged to the subsurface. This includes the review of technical, operational, and management options available to reduce total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations in cooling tower and mechanical equipment water discharges at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL's) Experimental Test Site (Site 300) facility. It was observed that for the six cooling towers currently in operation, the total volume of groundwater used as make up water is about 27 gallons per minute and the discharge to the subsurface via percolation pits is 13 gallons per minute. The extracted groundwater has a TDS concentration of 700 mg/L. The cooling tower discharge concentrations range from 700 to 1,400 mg/L. There is also a small volume of mechanical equipment effluent being discharged to percolation pits, with a TDS range from 400 to 3,300 mg/L. The cooling towers and mechanical equipment are maintained and operated in a satisfactory manner. No major leaks were identified. Currently, there are no re-use options being employed. Several approaches known to reduce the blow down flow rate and/or TDS concentration being discharged to the percolation pits and septic systems were reviewed for technical feasibility and cost efficiency. These options range from efforts as simple as eliminating leaks to implementing advanced and innovative treatment methods. The various options considered, and their anticipated effect on water consumption, discharge volumes, and reduced concentrations are listed and compared in this report. Based on the assessment, it was recommended that there is enough variability in equipment usage, chemistry, flow rate, and discharge configurations that each discharge location at Site 300 should be considered separately when deciding on an approach for reducing the salt discharge to the subsurface. The smaller units may justify moderate changes to equipment, and may benefit from increased cleaning frequencies, more accurate and suitable chemical treatment, and sources of make up water and discharge re-use. The larger cooling towers would be more suitable for automated systems where they don't already exist, re-circulation and treatment of blow down water, and enhanced chemical dosing strategies. It may be more technically feasible and cost efficient for the smaller cooling towers to be replaced by closed loop dry coolers or hybrid towers. There are several potential steps that could be taken at each location to reduce the TDS concentration and/or water use. These include: sump water filtration, minimization of drift, accurate chemical dosing, and use of scale and corrosion coupons for chemical calibration. The implementation of some of these options could be achieved by a step-wise approach taken at two representative facilities. Once viable prototype systems have been proven in the field, systematic implementation should proceed for the remaining systems, with cost, desired reduction, and general feasibility taken into consideration for such systems.

Daily III, W D

2010-02-24T23:59:59.000Z

11

Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - May 2010 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - May Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - May 2010 Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - May 2010 May 2010 Review of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Fire Protection Design Review Process This review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Fire Protection Design Review Process, conducted on March 24 through April 2, 2010, was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Livermore Site Office (LSO) and conducted jointly with LSO staff. Overall, the design review process was observed to be effective and the LLNL programs for performing these reviews were being implemented. Many aspects of the process are effective, and the personnel who implement it are knowledgeable and experienced. This review identified only one

12

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL): What we do  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

About LLNL > What we do About LLNL About LLNL What we do How we do it Our Values Organization Management and Sponsors Publications History Organizations Global Security National...

13

Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Livermore National Laboratory Operational Drill at the B332 Plutonium Facility HIAR LLNL-2013-02-27 The Livermore Site Office (LSO) and Lawrence Livermore National Security,...

14

Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - February 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - February 2011 Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - February 2011 February 2011 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Safety Basis Assessment This site visit report documents the collective results of the review of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) safety basis processes and discusses its scope, objective, results and conclusions. Appendix A provides lists of the documents, interviews, and observations and Appendix B includes the plan for the review. This combined assessment was sponsored by the National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA) Livermore Site Office (LSO) and conducted jointly by staff from the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) and LSO. The review was conducted in late 2010 and included

15

Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March 2010 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March 2010 Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March 2010 March 2010 Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Identified Defective Department of Transportation Hazardous Material Packages This review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) identification, immediate actions, communications, documentation, evaluation, reporting and follow-up to the discovery of defective Department of Transportation (DOT) UN1A2 55- and 30-gallon open head single bolt closure steel drums intended for storage and transportation of hazardous waste and materials, conducted on January 26-29, 2010, was sponsored by the DOE Livermore Site Office (LSO) to support interface with

16

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site Lead Planning Activities, October 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Report Number: HIAR LLNL-2012-10-23 Site: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for Site Lead Planning Activities at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Dates of Activity 10/23/2012 - 10/24/2012 Report Preparer: Robert Freeman Activity Description/Purpose: The purpose of this Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Independent Oversight activity was to maintain site operational awareness of key nuclear safety performance areas, monitor ongoing site oversight and planning activities for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) nuclear facilities, and identify and initiate coordination of future HSS oversight activities at the site, including planned HSS targeted reviews planned for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013.

17

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site Lead Planning Activities, October 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report Number: HIAR LLNL-2012-10-23 Site: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for Site Lead Planning Activities at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Dates of Activity 10/23/2012 - 10/24/2012 Report Preparer: Robert Freeman Activity Description/Purpose: The purpose of this Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Independent Oversight activity was to maintain site operational awareness of key nuclear safety performance areas, monitor ongoing site oversight and planning activities for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) nuclear facilities, and identify and initiate coordination of future HSS oversight activities at the site, including planned HSS targeted reviews planned for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013.

18

The Current and Historical Distribution of Special Status Amphibians at the Livermore Site and Site 300  

SciTech Connect

65 surveys were completed in 2002 to assess the current distribution of special status amphibians at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL) Livermore Site and Site 300. Combined with historical information from previous years, the information presented herein illustrates the dynamic and probable risk that amphibian populations face at both sites. The Livermore Site is developed and in stark contrast to the mostly undeveloped Site 300. Yet both sites have significant issues threatening the long-term sustainability of their respective amphibian populations. Livermore Site amphibians are presented with a suite of challenges inherent of urban interfaces, most predictably the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana), while Site 300's erosion issues and periodic feral pig (Sus scrofa) infestations reduce and threaten populations. The long-term sustainability of LLNL's special status amphibians will require active management and resource commitment to maintain and restore amphibian habitat at both sites.

Hattem, M V; Paterson, L; Woollett, J

2008-08-20T23:59:59.000Z

19

LIVERMORE SITE OFFICE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT PLAN For LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

LIVERMORE SITE OFFICE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT PLAN For LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY CONTRACT NO. DE-AC52-07NA27344 LSO_CMP_6-10-088 i CONTENTS Contents 1. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 3 2. PURPOSE .......................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Maintenance and Distribution ......................................................................................... 4 3. CONTRACT SUMMARY AND PRINCIPAL FEATURES............................................. 4 3.1 Contract Summary ...........................................................................................................

20

Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - February...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the collective results of the review of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) safety basis processes and discusses its scope, objective, results and conclusions....

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "llnl livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Lawrence Livermore Site Office |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore Site Lawrence Livermore Site Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Lawrence Livermore Site Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Lawrence Livermore Site Office. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD September 18, 2012 CX-010083: Categorical Exclusion Determination Radiography of Explosive Samples B321C CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/18/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): Lawrence Livermore Site Office September 18, 2012 CX-009257: Categorical Exclusion Determination Radiography of Explosive Samples B321C CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/18/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): Lawrence Livermore Site Office May 14, 2012 CX-008172: Categorical Exclusion Determination High-Pressure Crogenic Pump and Hydrogen Filling Station CX(s) Applied: B5.15 Date: 05/14/2012

22

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL): Visiting the Lab  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

for bringing restricted and controlled items onto the site. The public is invited to tour the Discovery Center, located just outside the Laboratory's gates off Greenville Road;...

23

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Operational Drill at the...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

HSS Independent Activity Report - Rev. 0 Report Number: HIAR LLNL-2013-02-27 Site: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's...

24

Federal Facility Compliance Act: Conceptual Site Treatment Plan for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) is required by section 3021(b) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended by the Federal Facility Compliance Act (the Act), to prepare plans describing the development of treatment capacities and technologies for treating mixed waste. The Act requires site treatment plans (STPs or plans) to be developed for each site at which DOE generates or stores mixed waste and submitted to the State or EPA for approval, approval with modification, or disapproval. The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Conceptual Site Treatment Plan (CSTP) is the preliminary version of the plan required by the Act and is being provided to California, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and others for review. A list of the other DOE sites preparing CSTPs is included in Appendix 1.1 of this document. Please note that Appendix 1.1 appears as Appendix A, pages A-1 and A-2 in this document.

Not Available

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

25

Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics (IGPP), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL): Quinquennial report, November 14-15, 1996  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Quinquennial Review Report of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) branch of the Institute for Geophysics and Planetary Physics (IGPP) provides an overview of IGPP-LLNL, its mission, and research highlights of current scientific activities. This report also presents an overview of the University Collaborative Research Program (UCRP), a summary of the UCRP Fiscal Year 1997 proposal process and the project selection list, a funding summary for 1993-1996, seminars presented, and scientific publications. 2 figs., 3 tabs.

Tweed, J.

1996-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

26

Site Visit Report, Livermore Site Office - February 2011 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site Visit Report, Livermore Site Office - February 2011 Site Visit Report, Livermore Site Office - February 2011 Site Visit Report, Livermore Site Office - February 2011 February 2011 Livermore Site Office Safety Basis Self-Assessment This site visit report documents the collective results of the Office of Health, Safety and Security's (HSS) assessment of National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA) Livermore Site Office (LSO) safety basis processes and discusses its scope, objective, results and conclusions. Appendix A provides lists of the documents, interviews, and observations and Appendix B includes the plan for the review. The assessment was sponsored by LSO as a self-assessment and conducted jointly by HSS and LSO staff. It was completed in late 2010 and included site visits from November 29 - December

27

LLNL Chronic Beryllium Disease Protection Program Effectiveness...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

LLNL-2011-03-25 Site: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report...

28

Determination of effective acceleration for use in design at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory site  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

An rms-based effective acceleration study has been conducted for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The study used real time history records with epicentral distances, magnitudes and site conditions deemed appropriate for the LLNL Livermore site. Only those records having strong motion durations, T{sub D}{prime}, >3.0 seconds, and peak ground acceleration {ge} .4g were selected for determining the effective acceleration hazard curve used in design. These parameters are consistent with LLNL's use of broad-band Newmark-Hall Spectra for design, and the high peak instrumental accelerations corresponding to the return intervals of interest. Study results were used to modify the acceleration hazard curve for facility design/evaluation at LLNL.

Coats, D.W. Jr.

1991-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

29

LLNL Director Search  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

LLNL DIRECTOR SEARCH Home Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL DIRECTOR SEARCH Position Description About LLNL News Questions and Answers THE PROCESS Nomination and...

30

Former Worker Medical Screening Program - Lawrence Livermore...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Livermore National Laboratory Former Workers Former Worker Medical Screening Program (FWP) Project Name: Worker Health Protection Program Covered DOE Site: LLNL...

31

Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site Lead Planning Activities HIAR LLNL-2012-10-23 The purpose of this Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Independent...

32

Estimating The Reliability of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Flash X-ray (FXR) Machine  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

At Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), our flash X-ray accelerator (FXR) is used on multi-million dollar hydrodynamic experiments. Because of the importance of the radiographs, FXR must be ultra-reliable. Flash linear accelerators that can generate a 3 kA beam at 18 MeV are very complex. They have thousands, if not millions, of critical components that could prevent the machine from performing correctly. For the last five years, we have quantified and are tracking component failures. From this data, we have determined that the reliability of the high-voltage gas-switches that initiate the pulses, which drive the accelerator cells, dominates the statistics. The failure mode is a single-switch pre-fire that reduces the energy of the beam and degrades the X-ray spot-size. The unfortunate result is a lower resolution radiograph. FXR is a production machine that allows only a modest number of pulses for testing. Therefore, reliability switch testing that requires thousands of shots is performed on our test stand. Study of representative switches has produced pre-fire statistical information and probability distribution curves. This information is applied to FXR to develop test procedures and determine individual switch reliability using a minimal number of accelerator pulses.

Ong, M M; Kihara, R; Zentler, J M; Kreitzer, B R; DeHope, W J

2007-06-27T23:59:59.000Z

33

LLNL Chronic Beryllium Disease Protection Program Effectiveness Review, March 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

LLNL-2011-03-25 LLNL-2011-03-25 Site: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program Effectiveness Review Dates of Activity : 03/14/2011 - 03/25/2011 Report Preparer: Marvin Mielke Activity Description/Purpose: The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and the Livermore Site Office (LSO) chartered a team to conduct an effectiveness review of the issues identified with the LLNL Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program (CBDPP). The team included members and observers from LLNL, LSO, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), and the

34

LLNL Chronic Beryllium Disease Protection Program Effectiveness Review, March 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

LLNL-2011-03-25 LLNL-2011-03-25 Site: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program Effectiveness Review Dates of Activity : 03/14/2011 - 03/25/2011 Report Preparer: Marvin Mielke Activity Description/Purpose: The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and the Livermore Site Office (LSO) chartered a team to conduct an effectiveness review of the issues identified with the LLNL Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program (CBDPP). The team included members and observers from LLNL, LSO, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), and the

35

Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - October 2012 Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - October 2012 October 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site Lead Planning Activities [HIAR LLNL-2012-10-23] The purpose of this Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Independent Oversight activity was to maintain site operational awareness of key nuclear safety performance areas, monitor ongoing site oversight and planning activities for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) nuclear facilities, and identify and initiate coordination of future HSS oversight activities at the site, including planned HSS targeted reviews planned for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013. Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -

36

LLNL Ready-to-Sign (RTS) Licensing Program  

City of Livermore. Community. Our Community. Discovery Center. Site Tours. LLNL Community News. ... LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nucle ...

37

Independent Activity Report, Livermore Site Office - January 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Activity Report, Livermore Site Office - January 2011 Independent Activity Report, Livermore Site Office - January 2011 Independent Activity Report, Livermore Site Office - January 2011 January 2011 Livermore Site Office Facility Representative Program Assessment [ARPT-LSO-2011-001] This activity report documents the results of the Office of Health, Safety and Security's (HSS) review of and participation in the Livermore Site Office Self-Assessment of the Facility Representative (FR) Program. This self-assessment was led by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Livermore Site Office (LSO) and conducted by LSO staff, HSS staff, National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Office of the Chief of Defense Nuclear Safety (CDNS) staff, a peer from Los Alamos Site Office, and a FR subject matter expert from NNSA.

38

Livermore Site Office Facility Representative Program Self-Assessment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ARPT-LSO-2011-001 ARPT-LSO-2011-001 Site: Livermore Site Office Subject: Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Activity Report for the Livermore Site Office Facility Representative Program Self-Assessment Dates of Activity 01/24/2011 - 01/28/2011 Report Preparer Robert Freeman Activity Description/Purpose: This activity report documents the results of the Office of Health, Safety and Security's (HSS) review of and participation in the Livermore Site Office Self-Assessment of the Facility Representative (FR) Program. This self-assessment was led by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Livermore Site Office (LSO) and conducted by LSO staff, HSS staff, National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Office of the Chief of Defense Nuclear Safety (CDNS) staff, a peer from Los Alamos Site

39

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

LLNL Home. Latest News Headlines. LLNL, Intel, Cray produce big data machine. November 4, 2013. ... Operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, ...

40

Superconducting magnet development capability of the LLNL (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) High Field Test Facility  

SciTech Connect

This paper discusses the following topics: High-Field Test Facility Equipment at LLNL; FENIX Magnet Facility; High-Field Test Facility (HFTF) 2-m Solenoid; Cryogenic Mechanical Test Facility; Electro-Mechanical Conductor Test Apparatus; Electro-Mechanical Wire Test Apparatus; FENIX/HFTF Data System and Network Topology; Helium Gas Management System (HGMS); Airco Helium Liquefier/Refrigerator; CTI 2800 Helium Liquefier; and MFTF-B/ITER Magnet Test Facility.

Miller, J.R.; Shen, S.; Summers, L.T.

1990-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "llnl livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Lawrence Livermore Site Office Manager Joins EM's Senior Leadership Team  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore Site Office Manager Joins EM's Senior Lawrence Livermore Site Office Manager Joins EM's Senior Leadership Team Lawrence Livermore Site Office Manager Joins EM's Senior Leadership Team November 9, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis WASHINGTON, D.C. - EM Acting Assistant Secretary Dave Huizenga announced today that Alice Williams, manager of the DOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Lawrence Livermore Site Office has joined the EM senior leadership team. "I am very excited to have Alice join EM Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary Tracy Mustin and I as we continue work toward the achievement of the EM vision and the continuing evolution of an EM organization that is focused on delivery of mission success to meet the nation's needs in the 21st century," Huizenga said. In ensuing months, Williams will work closely with Huizenga and Mustin as

42

2010 Annual Planning Summary Livermore Site Office (LSO) | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to be prepared in the next 24 months, and the planned cost and schedule for each NEPA review identified. 2010 Annual Planning Summary Livermore Site Office (LSO) More Documents...

43

Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 2012 October 2012 Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - October 2012 October 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site Lead Planning Activities [HIAR LLNL-2012-10-23] The purpose of this Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Independent Oversight activity was to maintain site operational awareness of key nuclear safety performance areas, monitor ongoing site oversight and planning activities for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) nuclear facilities, and identify and initiate coordination of future HSS oversight activities at the site, including planned HSS targeted reviews planned for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013. Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - October 2012 More Documents & Publications

44

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratorys (LLNL) primary mission is research and development in support of national security. As a...

45

Remedial investigation of the High-Explosives (HE) Process Area, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site 300  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report presents the results of a Remedial Investigation (RI) to define the extent of high explosives (HE) compounds and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) found in the soil, rocks, and ground water of the HE Process Area of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL) Site 300 Facility. The report evaluates potential public health environmental risks associated with these compounds. Hydrogeologic information available before February 15, 1990, is included; however, chemical analyses and water-level data are reported through March 1990. This report is intended to assist the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)--Central Valley Region and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in evaluating the extent of environmental contamination of the LLNL HE Process Area and ultimately in designing remedial actions. 90 refs., 20 figs., 7 tabs.

Crow, N.B.; Lamarre, A.L.

1990-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

46

Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March 2011 Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March 2011 March 2011 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program Effectiveness Review [HIAR-LLNL-2011-03-25] The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and the Livermore Site Office (LSO) chartered a team to conduct an effectiveness review of the issues identified with the LLNL Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program (CBDPP). The team included members and observers from LLNL, LSO, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), and the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The team's final report documents the results of the effectiveness review and the actions taken by LLNL to resolve and prevent recurrence of 44

47

Historical Doses from Tritiated Water and Tritiated Hydrogen Gas Released to the Atmosphere from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). Part 6. Summary  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Throughout fifty-three years of operations, an estimated 792,000 Ci (29,300 TBq) of tritium have been released to the atmosphere at the Livermore site of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL); about 75% was tritium gas (HT) primarily from the accidental releases of 1965 and 1970. Routine emissions contributed slightly more than 100,000 Ci (3,700 TBq) HT and about 75,000 Ci (2,800 TBq) tritiated water vapor (HTO) to the total. A Tritium Dose Reconstruction was undertaken to estimate both the annual doses to the public for each year of LLNL operations and the doses from the few accidental releases. Some of the dose calculations were new, and the others could be compared with those calculated by LLNL. Annual doses (means and 95% confidence intervals) to the potentially most exposed member of the public were calculated for all years using the same model and the same assumptions. Predicted tritium concentrations in air were compared with observed mean annual concentrations at one location from 1973 onwards. Doses predicted from annual emissions were compared with those reported in the past by LLNL. The highest annual mean dose predicted from routine emissions was 34 {micro}Sv (3.4 mrem) in 1957; its upper confidence limit, based on very conservative assumptions about the speciation of the release, was 370 {micro}Sv (37 mrem). The upper confidence limits for most annual doses were well below the current regulatory limit of 100 {micro}Sv (10 mrem) for dose to the public from release to the atmosphere; the few doses that exceeded this were well below the regulatory limits of the time. Lacking the hourly meteorological data needed to calculate doses from historical accidental releases, ingestion/inhalation dose ratios were derived from a time-dependent accident consequence model that accounts for the complex behavior of tritium in the environment. Ratios were modified to account for only those foods growing at the time of the releases. The highest dose from an accidental release was calculated for a release of about 1,500 Ci HTO that occurred in October 1954. The likely dose for this release was probably less than 360 {micro}Sv (36 mrem), but, because of many unknowns (e.g., release-specific meteorological and accidental conditions) and conservative assumptions, the uncertainty was very high. As a result, the upper confidence limit on the predictions, considered a dose that could not have been exceeded, was estimated to be 2 mSv (200 mrem). The next highest dose, from the 1970 accidental release of about 290,000 Ci (10,700 TBq) HT when wind speed and wind direction were known, was one-third as great. Doses from LLNL accidental releases were well below regulatory reporting limits. All doses, from both routine and accidental releases, were far below the level (3.6 mSv [360 mrem] per year) at which adverse health effects have been documented in the literature.

Peterson, S

2007-09-05T23:59:59.000Z

48

LLNL (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Oil Shale Pilot Plant status report  

SciTech Connect

The authors are studying aboveground oil shale retorting and have developed the LLNL Hot-Recycled-Solid (HRS) process as a generic, second-generation, rapid pyrolysis retorting system in which recycled shale is the solid heat carrier. In 1984-87, they operated a 1 ton-per-day HRS pilot plant to study retorting chemistry in an actual recirculation loop, Cena (1986). In 1989 they upgraded their laboratory pilot plant to process 4 ton-per-day of commercially sized shale, which will allow them, for the first time, to study pyrolysis and combustion chemistry using the full particle size, to produce enough oil for detailed characterization studies, to study environmental consequences, and to begin answering the many bulk solid handling questions concerning scale-up of the HRS process. In this paper the authors report on the status of their pilot plant operations. They have operated the facility circulating raw shale at ambient temperature and dolomite at elevated temperature. They plan the first hot shale run in November 1990. 5 refs., 16 figs., 4 tabs.

Cena, R.J.; Thorsness, C.B.

1990-10-26T23:59:59.000Z

49

Characterization of the Neutron Fields in the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Radiation Calibration Laboratory Low Scatter Calibration Facility  

SciTech Connect

In June 2007, the Department of Energy (DOE) revised its rule on Occupational Radiation Protection, Part 10 CFR 835. A significant aspect of the revision was the adoption of the recommendations outlined in International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Report 60 (ICRP-60), including new radiation weighting factors for neutrons, updated internal dosimetric models, and dose terms consistent with the newer ICRP recommendations. ICRP-60 uses the quantities defined by the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) for personnel and area monitoring including the ambient dose equivalent H*(d). A Joint Task Group of ICRU and ICRP has developed various fluence-to-dose conversion coefficients which are published in ICRP-74 for both protection and operational quantities. In February 2008, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) replaced its old pneumatic transport neutron irradiation system in the Radiation Calibration Laboratory (RCL) Low Scatter Calibration Facility (B255, Room 183A) with a Hopewell Designs irradiator model N40. The exposure tube for the Hopewell system is located close to, but not in exactly the same position as the exposure tube for the pneumatic system. Additionally, the sources for the Hopewell system are stored in Room 183A where, prior to the change, they were stored in a separate room (Room 183C). The new source configuration and revision of the 10 CFR 835 radiation weighting factors necessitate a re-evaluation of the neutron dose rates in B255 Room 183A. This report deals only with the changes in the operational quantities ambient dose equivalent and ambient dose rate equivalent for neutrons as a result of the implementation of the revised 10 CFR 835. In the report, the terms 'neutron dose' and 'neutron dose rate' will be used for convenience for ambient neutron dose equivalent and ambient neutron dose rate equivalent unless otherwise stated.

Radev, R

2009-09-04T23:59:59.000Z

50

Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Laborat... Laborat... file:///I|/Data%20Migration%20Task/EIS-0157-FEIS-03-1992/05eis0157_f.html[6/27/2011 9:57:50 AM] APPENDIX F ECOLOGY AND BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT This appendix contains two major sections. Section F.1 is a discussion of the ecological characteristics at the LLNL Livermore site, LLNL Site 300, and SNL, Livermore (referred to collectively as the study sites); and presents information and data on the flora and fauna in the upland areas (see Appendix G for a detailed analysis of wetlands at the study sites). This section focuses on the biological features of LLNL Site 300 because this 7000-acre site is largely undeveloped and represents the most biologically diverse area under study. In contrast, the LLNL Livermore site and SNL, Livermore are developed areas that provide only marginal wildlife habitat because of the high degree of human activity and the few

51

2011 LLNL Template  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-555917 12 Mixed carbonatebicarbonate (Trona) Searles Lake Water is required as a flux - making a difficult crystal mush Rates of...

52

Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2005 Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2005 June 2005 Inspection of Emergency Management at the Livermore Site Office and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA), within the Office of Security and Safety Performance Assurance, conducted an inspection of the emergency management program at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) site in June 2005. The inspection was performed by the OA Office of Emergency Management Oversight. This 2005 OA inspection determined that LLNL has completed program development work or has established an appropriate framework for nearly all

53

Results of Surveys for Special Status Reptiles at the Site 300 Facilities of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to present the results of a live-trapping and visual surveys for special status reptiles at the Site 300 Facilities of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). The survey was conducted under the authority of the Federal recovery permit of Swaim Biological Consulting (PRT-815537) and a Memorandum of Understanding issued from the California Department of Fish and Game. Site 300 is located between Livermore and Tracy just north of Tesla road (Alameda County) and Corral Hollow Road (San Joaquin County) and straddles the Alameda and San Joaquin County line (Figures 1 and 2). It encompasses portions of the USGS 7.5 minute Midway and Tracy quadrangles (Figure 2). Focused surveys were conducted for four special status reptiles including the Alameda whipsnake (Masticophis lateralis euryxanthus), the San Joaquin Whipsnake (Masticophis Hagellum ruddock), the silvery legless lizard (Anniella pulchra pulchra), and the California horned lizard (Phrynosoma coronanum frontale).

Woollett, J J

2008-09-18T23:59:59.000Z

54

Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 2011 March 2011 Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March 2011 March 2011 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program Effectiveness Review [HIAR-LLNL-2011-03-25] The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and the Livermore Site Office (LSO) chartered a team to conduct an effectiveness review of the issues identified with the LLNL Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program (CBDPP). The team included members and observers from LLNL, LSO, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), and the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The team's final report documents the results of the effectiveness review and the actions taken by LLNL to resolve and prevent recurrence of 44

55

Historical Doses from Tritiated Water and Tritiated Hydrogen Gas Released to the Atmosphere from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Part 1. Description of Tritium Dose Model (DCART) for Routine Releases from LLNL  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

DCART (Doses from Chronic Atmospheric Releases of Tritium) is a spreadsheet model developed at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) that calculates doses from inhalation of tritiated hydrogen gas (HT), inhalation and skin absorption of tritiated water (HTO), and ingestion of HTO and organically bound tritium (OBT) to adult, child (age 10), and infant (age 6 months to 1 year) from routine atmospheric releases of HT and HTO. DCART is a deterministic model that, when coupled to the risk assessment software Crystal Ball{reg_sign}, predicts doses with a 95% confidence interval. The equations used by DCART are described and all distributions on parameter values are presented. DCART has been tested against the results of other models and several sets of observations in the Tritium Working Groups of the International Atomic Energy Agency's programs, Biosphere Modeling and Assessment and Environmental Modeling for Radiation Safety. The version of DCART described here has been modified to include parameter values and distributions specific to conditions at LLNL. In future work, DCART will be used to reconstruct dose to the hypothetical maximally exposed individual from annual routine releases of HTO and HT from all LLNL facilities and from the Sandia National Laboratory's Tritium Research Laboratory over the last fifty years.

Peterson, S R

2006-09-27T23:59:59.000Z

56

Historical Doses from Tritiated Water and Tritiated Hydrogen Gas Relesed to the Atmosphere from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Part 1. Description of Tritium Dose Model (DCART) for Chronic Releases from LLNL  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

DCART (Doses from Chronic Atmospheric Releases of Tritium) is a spreadsheet model developed at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) that calculates doses from inhalation of tritiated hydrogen gas (HT), inhalation and skin absorption of tritiated water (HTO), and ingestion of HTO and organically bound tritium (OBT) to adult, child (age 10), and infant (age 6 months to 1 year) from routine atmospheric releases of HT and HTO. DCART is a deterministic model that, when coupled to the risk assessment software Crystal Ball{reg_sign}, predicts doses with a 95th percentile confidence interval. The equations used by DCART are described and all distributions on parameter values are presented. DCART has been tested against the results of other models and several sets of observations in the Tritium Working Group of the International Atomic Energy Agency's Biosphere Modeling and Assessment Programme. The version of DCART described here has been modified to include parameter values and distributions specific to conditions at LLNL. In future work, DCART will be used to reconstruct dose to the hypothetical maximally exposed individual from annual routine releases of HTO and HT from all LLNL facilities and from the Sandia National Laboratory's Tritium Research Laboratory over the last fifty years.

Peterson, S

2004-06-30T23:59:59.000Z

57

Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - February 2009 Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - February 2009 February 2009 Inspection of Emergency Management at the Livermore Site Office and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight inspected the emergency management program at DOE's Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in October/November 2008. The inspection was performed by Independent Oversight's Office of Emergency Management Oversight. This 2008 inspection found that overall, the LLNL emergency management program is, with a few exceptions, well defined and better implemented in most areas than observed during previous inspections, but some implementation weaknesses remain that diminish the ability of the program

58

Final Clean Closure Report Site 300 Surface Impoundments Closure Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, California  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory operated two Class II surface impoundments that stored wastewater that was discharged from a number of buildings located on the Site 300 Facility (Site 300). The wastewater was the by-product of explosives processing. Reduction in the volume of water discharged from these buildings over the past several years significantly reduced the wastewater storage needs. In addition, the impoundments were constructed in 1984, and the high-density polyethylene (HDPE) geomembrane liners were nearing the end of their service life. The purpose of this project was to clean close the surface impoundments and provide new wastewater storage using above ground storage tanks at six locations. The tanks were installed and put into service prior to closure of the impoundments. This Clean Closure Report (Closure Report) complies with State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Section 21400 of the California Code of Regulations Title 27 (27 CCR section 21400). As required by these regulations and guidance, this Closure Report provides the following information: (1) a brief site description; (2) the regulatory requirements relevant to clean closure of the impoundments; (3) the closure procedures; and (4) the findings and documentation of clean closure.

Haskell, K

2006-02-14T23:59:59.000Z

59

Microsoft Word - LLNL PFD Final072307.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Livermore National Laboratory" BACKGROUND The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) is a research and development institution that supports the Department of Energy's...

60

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

LLNL Home. Latest News Headlines. ... Operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "llnl livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

LLNL NESHAPs 2008 Annual Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC operates facilities at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) where radionuclides are handled and stored. These facilities are subject to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) in Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 40, Part 61, Subpart H, which regulates radionuclide emissions to air from Department of Energy (DOE) facilities. Specifically, NESHAPs limits the emission of radionuclides to the ambient air to levels resulting in an annual effective dose equivalent of 10 mrem (100 {mu}Sv) to any member of the public. Using measured and calculated emissions, and building-specific and common parameters, LLNL personnel applied the EPA-approved computer code, CAP88-PC, Version 1.0, to calculate the dose to the maximally exposed individual for the Livermore site and Site 300. The dose for the LLNL site-wide maximally exposed members of the public from operations in 2008 are summarized here: {sm_bullet} Livermore site: 0.0013 mrem (0.013 {mu}Sv) (26% from point source emissions, 74% from diffuse source emissions). The point source emissions include gaseous tritium modeled as tritiated water vapor as directed by EPA Region IX; the resulting dose is used for compliance purposes. {sm_bullet} Site 300: 0.000000044 mrem (0.00000044 {mu}Sv) (100% from point source emissions).

Bertoldo, N; Gallegos, G; MacQueen, D; Wegrecki, A; Wilson, K

2009-06-25T23:59:59.000Z

62

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July 2013 July 2013 Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Livermore Field Office (LFO) and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Site 200 preparedness for severe natural phenomena events (NPEs). The HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations performed this review to evaluate the processes for identifying emergency response capabilities and

63

Lawrence Livermore announces new strategic national security...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Livermore announces new strategic national security assignments Lynda L Seaver, LLNL, (925) 423-3103, seaver1@llnl.gov Printer-friendly Bruce Goodwin Photos by Julie...

64

Site Visit Report - Review of the Lawrence Livermore National...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Utility Service Division. In addition, various LLNL management policies, department manuals, and procedures were reviewed. A diagram depicting the flowdown of these requirements...

65

LLNL's Saturday lectures explore cutting edge science  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

| NR-13-01-02 LLNL's Saturday lectures explore cutting edge science Linda A Lucchetti, LLNL, (925) 422-5815, lucchetti1@llnl.gov Printer-friendly Lawrence Livermore National...

66

Serving the Nation for Fifty Years: 1952 - 2002 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [LLNL], Fifty Years of Accomplishments  

DOE R&D Accomplishments (OSTI)

For 50 years, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has been making history and making a difference. The outstanding efforts by a dedicated work force have led to many remarkable accomplishments. Creative individuals and interdisciplinary teams at the Laboratory have sought breakthrough advances to strengthen national security and to help meet other enduring national needs. The Laboratory's rich history includes many interwoven stories -- from the first nuclear test failure to accomplishments meeting today's challenges. Many stories are tied to Livermore's national security mission, which has evolved to include ensuring the safety, security, and reliability of the nation's nuclear weapons without conducting nuclear tests and preventing the proliferation and use of weapons of mass destruction. Throughout its history and in its wide range of research activities, Livermore has achieved breakthroughs in applied and basic science, remarkable feats of engineering, and extraordinary advances in experimental and computational capabilities. From the many stories to tell, one has been selected for each year of the Laboratory's history. Together, these stories give a sense of the Laboratory -- its lasting focus on important missions, dedication to scientific and technical excellence, and drive to made the world more secure and a better place to live.

2002-00-00T23:59:59.000Z

67

Lawrence Livermore announces voluntary separation program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

| NR-13-05-02 Lawrence Livermore announces voluntary separation program Lynda L Seaver, LLNL, (925) 423-3103, seaver1@llnl.gov Printer-friendly Lawrence Livermore National...

68

Site Visit Report - Review of the Lawrence Livermore National...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

from the work control program (Superblock Work Control Manual, LLNL-AR-409585). A process flow chart within this manual described the change control process and key steps when...

69

Microsoft Word - Functional Analysis for Selected Sites - March...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lab (LANL), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), and the Nevada Test site (NTS). The culmination of the entire effort would then be published in a full revision to...

70

Technical Safety Appraisal of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

This report documents the results of the Technical Safety Appraisal (TSA) of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) (including the Site 300 area), Livermore, California, conducted from February 26 to April 5, 1990. The purpose of the assessment was to provide the Secretary of Energy with the status of Environment, Safety and Health (ES H) Programs at LLNL. LLNL is operated by the University of California for the Department of Energy (DOE), and is a multi-program, mission-oriented institution engaged in fundamental and applied research programs that require a multidisciplinary approach. 1 fig.

1990-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

71

CES-21 board meets at Lawrence Livermore  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1613ces 04162013 CES-21 board meets at Lawrence Livermore James A Bono, LLNL, (925) 422-9919, bono4@llnl.gov Printer-friendly LLNL's Computation Associate Director Dona Crawford...

72

Final Revised Environmental Assessment for The Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

R R Final Revised Environmental Assessment for The Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California Issued: December 2002 Revised: January 2008 Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Livermore Site Office This page intentionally left blank. FINAL Revised EA for the Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at LLNL ii FORWARD The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) of the Department of Energy (DOE) has responsibility for national programs to reduce and counter threats from weapons of mass destruction including nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons (bioweapons). NNSA's bioscience work at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in support of these

73

EA-1106: Explosive Waste Treatment Facility at Site 300, Lawrence Livermore  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

106: Explosive Waste Treatment Facility at Site 300, Lawrence 106: Explosive Waste Treatment Facility at Site 300, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, San Joaquin County, California EA-1106: Explosive Waste Treatment Facility at Site 300, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, San Joaquin County, California SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposal to build, permit, and operate the Explosive Waste Treatment Facility to treat explosive waste at the U.S. Department of Energy's Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Experimental Test Site, Site 300. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD April 16, 1996 EA-1106: Finding of No Significant Impact Explosive Waste Treatment Facility at Site 300, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory April 16, 1996

74

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Environmental Report 2010  

SciTech Connect

The purposes of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Environmental Report 2010 are to record Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL's) compliance with environmental standards and requirements, describe LLNL's environmental protection and remediation programs, and present the results of environmental monitoring at the two LLNL sites - the Livermore site and Site 300. The report is prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) by LLNL's Environmental Protection Department. Submittal of the report satisfies requirements under DOE Order 231.1A, Environmental Safety and Health Reporting, and DOE Order 5400.5, Radiation Protection of the Public and Environment. The report is distributed electronically and is available at https://saer.llnl.gov/, the website for the LLNL annual environmental report. Previous LLNL annual environmental reports beginning in 1994 are also on the website. Some references in the electronic report text are underlined, which indicates that they are clickable links. Clicking on one of these links will open the related document, data workbook, or website that it refers to. The report begins with an executive summary, which provides the purpose of the report and an overview of LLNL's compliance and monitoring results. The first three chapters provide background information: Chapter 1 is an overview of the location, meteorology, and hydrogeology of the two LLNL sites; Chapter 2 is a summary of LLNL's compliance with environmental regulations; and Chapter 3 is a description of LLNL's environmental programs with an emphasis on the Environmental Management System including pollution prevention. The majority of the report covers LLNL's environmental monitoring programs and monitoring data for 2010: effluent and ambient air (Chapter 4); waters, including wastewater, storm water runoff, surface water, rain, and groundwater (Chapter 5); and terrestrial, including soil, sediment, vegetation, foodstuff, ambient radiation, and special status wildlife and plants (Chapter 6). Complete monitoring data, which are summarized in the body of the report, are provided in Appendix A. The remaining three chapters discuss the radiological impact on the public from LLNL operations (Chapter 7), LLNL's groundwater remediation program (Chapter 8), and quality assurance for the environmental monitoring programs (Chapter 9). The report uses System International units, consistent with the federal Metric Conversion Act of 1975 and Executive Order 12770, Metric Usage in Federal Government Programs (1991). For ease of comparison to environmental reports issued prior to 1991, dose values and many radiological measurements are given in both metric and U.S. customary units. A conversion table is provided in the glossary.

Jones, H E; Bertoldo, N A; Campbell, C G; Cerruti, S J; Coty, J D; Dibley, V R; Doman, J L; Grayson, A R; MacQueen, D H; Wegrecki, A M; Armstrong, D H; Brigdon, S L; Heidecker, K R; Hollister, R K; Khan, H N; Lee, G S; Nelson, J C; Paterson, L E; Salvo, V J; Schwartz, W W; Terusaki, S H; Wilson, K R; Woods, J M; Yimbo, P O; Gallegos, G M; Terrill, A A; Revelli, M A; Rosene, C A; Blake, R G; Woollett, J S; Kumamoto, G

2011-09-14T23:59:59.000Z

75

Technologies - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

LLNL Home. Latest News Headlines. ... Operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration

76

Search - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Giving animals in need a HOME. November 14, 2013. LLNL, Intel, Cray produce big data machine. ... Operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, ...

77

Aerosol Simulations by LLNL IMPACT and Comparisons with Field...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Simulations by LLNL IMPACT and Comparisons with Field Measurements C. C. Chuang, D. Bergman, J. Dignon, and P. Connell Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, California...

78

2011 LLNL Template  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PRES-555917 PRES-555917 This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC Roger D. Aines Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Award: 09/CJ000/05/01 (LLNS) DE---AR0000099 (University of Illinois and Babcock & Wilcox) Lead Recipient: Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS) Project Title: Catalytic Improvement of Solvent Capture Systems Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-555917 2 WHY?  Enable lower energy solvent systems WHAT?  Rugged synthetic catalysts  Surface area enhancement Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-555917 3 We developed a family of catalysts that speed capture in hindered amines and carbonates

79

Lawrence Livermore research highlighted at AAAS annual meeting  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lawrence Livermore research highlighted at AAAS annual meeting Breanna Bishop, LLNL, (925) 423-9802, bishop33@llnl.gov Printer-friendly Mike Dunne, Debbie Callahan and...

80

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | July 2011 Aerial View Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | July 2011 Aerial View Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL) primary mission is research and development in support of national security. As a nuclear weapons design laboratory, LLNL has responsibilities in nuclear stockpile stewardship. LLNL also applies its expertise to prevent the spread and use of weapons of mass destruction and strengthen homeland security. Other areas include advanced defense technologies, energy, environment, biosciences, and basic science. Enforcement July 22, 2013 Enforcement Letter, NEL-2013-03 Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC related to Programmatic

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "llnl livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Site safety plan for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory CERCLA investigations at site 300. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

Various Department of Energy Orders incorporate by reference, health and safety regulations promulgated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). One of the OSHA regulations, 29 CFR 1910.120, Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response, requires that site safety plans are written for activities such as those covered by work plans for Site 300 environmental investigations. Based upon available data, this Site Safety Plan (Plan) for environmental restoration has been prepared specifically for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site 300, located approximately 15 miles east of Livermore, California. As additional facts, monitoring data, or analytical data on hazards are provided, this Plan may need to be modified. It is the responsibility of the Environmental Restoration Program and Division (ERD) Site Safety Officer (SSO), with the assistance of Hazards Control, to evaluate data which may impact health and safety during these activities and to modify the Plan as appropriate. This Plan is not `cast-in-concrete.` The SSO shall have the authority, with the concurrence of Hazards Control, to institute any change to maintain health and safety protection for workers at Site 300.

Kilmer, J.

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

82

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June June 2, 2005 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 June 2, 2005 Enforcement Letter Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for Quality Assurance Deficiencies related to Weapon Activities, June 2, 2005 This letter is to inform you of the Department of Energy's (DOE) concern regarding several quality assurance-related deficiencies involving actions by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) personnel. These deficiencies were associated with a cracked explosive event that occurred at the Pantex site in January 2004. The timing of this letter is intended to coincide with a DOE enforcement action stemming from this event. Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 More Documents & Publications

83

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June June 2, 2005 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 June 2, 2005 Enforcement Letter Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for Quality Assurance Deficiencies related to Weapon Activities, June 2, 2005 This letter is to inform you of the Department of Energy's (DOE) concern regarding several quality assurance-related deficiencies involving actions by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) personnel. These deficiencies were associated with a cracked explosive event that occurred at the Pantex site in January 2004. The timing of this letter is intended to coincide with a DOE enforcement action stemming from this event. Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 More Documents & Publications

84

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Main Site FFA Under CERCLA Section 120, November 1, 1988 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Main Site) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Main Site) Federal Facility Agreement Under CERCLA Section 120, November 1, 1988 State California Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, implementing, and monitoring appropriate response actions at the Site Parties DOE; USEPA; California Department of Health Services; California Regional Water Quality Control Board Date 11/1/1988 SCOPE * Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, implementing, and monitoring appropriate response actions at the Site. * Establish a basis for a determination that the DOE has completed remedial action and corrective measures to satisfaction. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES

85

LLNL engineer spends time building affordable homes  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

atl_0103_williams atl_0103_williams 01/03/2014 LLNL engineer Alicia Williams, who volunteers for Habitat for Humanity, installs wood framing. LLNL engineer spends time building affordable homes Kenneth K Ma, LLNL, (925) 423-7602, ma28@llnl.gov Alicia Williams inspects roofing trusses at a construction site. Alicia Williams is developing technology to strengthen America's security and building homes to provide low-income families with affordable housing. The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory mechanical engineer in the Defense Technologies Engineering Division (DTED) is working on a weapons certification plan to support stockpile stewardship. But what she does on her free time is equally impressive. Williams is a Habitat for Humanity volunteer who spends her Saturdays laboring on rooftops, where she installs siding, nails in frames and puts

86

Lawrence Livermore Site Office Safety Basis Self-Assessment Final February 11, 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Livermore Site Office Livermore Site Office Safety Basis Self-Assessment INTRODUCTION This site visit report documents the collective results of the Office of Health, Safety and Security's (HSS) assessment of National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA) Livermore Site Office (LSO) safety basis processes and discusses its scope, objective, results and conclusions. Appendix A provides lists of the documents, interviews, and observations and Appendix B includes the plan for the review. The assessment was sponsored by LSO as a self-assessment and conducted jointly by HSS and LSO staff. It was completed in late 2010 and included site visits from November 29 - December 3, 2010 and December 13-17, 2010. The assessment revealed that LSO has implemented appropriate plans, procedures, and

87

Lawrence Livermore Site Office Safety Basis Self-Assessment Final February 11, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Livermore Site Office Livermore Site Office Safety Basis Self-Assessment INTRODUCTION This site visit report documents the collective results of the Office of Health, Safety and Security's (HSS) assessment of National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA) Livermore Site Office (LSO) safety basis processes and discusses its scope, objective, results and conclusions. Appendix A provides lists of the documents, interviews, and observations and Appendix B includes the plan for the review. The assessment was sponsored by LSO as a self-assessment and conducted jointly by HSS and LSO staff. It was completed in late 2010 and included site visits from November 29 - December 3, 2010 and December 13-17, 2010. The assessment revealed that LSO has implemented appropriate plans, procedures, and

88

LLNL garners two top physics stories of 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

stories 02212013 LLNL garners two top physics stories of 2012 Anne M Stark, LLNL, (925) 422-9799, stark8@llnl.gov Printer-friendly Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory garnered...

89

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > M & O Support Department > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory DE-AC52-07NA27344 Operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC BASIC Contract (Official) Modifications (Official) Funding Mods Available Upon Request Conformed Contract (Unofficial) LLNL Sec A (SF33) (pdf, 91KB) See Modifications Section under Conformed Contract Link LLNS Conformed Contract (weblink) LLNL Sec B-H (pdf, 306KB) LLNL Sec I pdf 687KB LLNL Sec J Appx A (pdf, 67KB) LLNL Sec J Appx B (pdf, 191KB) LLNL Sec J Appx C (pdf, 11KB) LLNL Sec J Appx D (pdf, 18KB)

90

Environmental Survey preliminary report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California  

SciTech Connect

This report presents the preliminary findings from the first phase of the Environmental Survey of the Department of Energy (DOE) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), conducted December 1 through 19, 1986. The Survey is being conducted by an interdisciplinary team of environmental specialists, led and managed by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health's Office of Environmental Audit. Individual team components are being supplied by a private contractor. The objective of the Survey is to identify environmental problems and areas of environmental risk associated with LLNL. The Survey covers all environmental media all areas of environmental regulation. It is being performed in accordance with the DOE Environmental Survey Manual. This phase of the Survey involves the review of existing site environmental data, observations of the operations performed at LLNL, and interviews with site personnel. A Sampling and Analysis Plan was developed to assist in further assessing certain of the environmental problems identified during performance of on-site activities. The Sampling and Analysis Plan will be executed by a DOE National Laboratory. When completed, the results will be incorporated into the LLNL Environmental Survey Interim Report. The Interim Report will reflect the final determinations of the LLNL Survey. 70 refs., 58 figs., 52 tabs.,

Not Available

1987-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

91

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL)  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

installation of X-ray powder diffractometer with imaging plate detector and diamond anvil cell, calibration and test experiments. Purpose of Work: Our goal is a better...

92

Search process for Lawrence Livermore director, LLNS president...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6.13search 11262013 Search process for Lawrence Livermore director, LLNS president gets under way Lynda L Seaver, LLNL, (925) 423-3103, seaver1@llnl.gov LIVERMORE, Calif. - The...

93

Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Environmental Remediation at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site 300 Pit 7 Complex  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Environmental Remediation at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site 300 Pit 7 Complex January 2007 Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Livermore Site Office EA for the Proposed Environmental Remediation at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site 300 Pit 7 Complex i CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................1 1.2 Purpose and Need for the Action .....................................................................................5

94

LLNL's NeMS: Network Mapping System  

High Performance Computing Innovation Center (Building 6475)located in LLNL's Livermore Valley Open Campus (LVOC) Seating is limited, Pre-registration ...

95

Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- March 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program Effectiveness Review [HIAR-LLNL-2011-03-25

96

Historical summary and recommendations on Melanoma in the LLNL workforce  

SciTech Connect

This document provides a historical summary and recommendations on melanoma in the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) workforce. Melanoma of the skin comprises about 3.5% of the incidence (38,000 new cases in 1991) and 1.7% of the mortality (8500 deaths in 1991) of all cancer in the U.S. However, for several decades it has shown the fastest rate of increase of any cancer site. The following areas are discussed: background and recognition of increased melanoma at LLNL, history of melanoma studies at LLNL, results from occupational factors study, overall conclusion on increased melanoma incidence, and recommendations for future management.

Moore, D.H. II; Hatch, F.

1994-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

97

Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 2013 February 2013 Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - February 2013 February 2013 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Operational Drill at the B332 Plutonium Facility [HIAR LLNL-2013-02-27] The Livermore Site Office (LSO) and Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS) requested personnel from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (HS-45) to observe an operational drill at the Plutonium Facility in Building 332 (B332). LSO and LLNS desired HS-45's participation to help determine the maturity of the operational drill program by providing independent expertise in the matter at a time when HS-45 personnel were already on site conducting an emergency management review. LLNS administered this operational drill using the DOE guidance for

98

2011 LLNL Template  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

43811 43811 This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC NNSA IMC Conference April 19, 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES-543811 2  Background and Goals of the Checklist  Areas to Consider  Expansion of some topics * Device Management * Device Verification * Device Lifecycle * Policies * Risk Management  Base Security Settings  App provisioning  BYOD  App Development and Hacking Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES-543811 3  Mobility is now pervasive * Critical to attracting new talent * Critical to modern mission delivery * Opting out is not viable

99

Revised Livermore seismic hazard estimates for sixty-nine nuclear power plant sites east of the Rocky Mountains. Final report, July 1993--March 1994  

SciTech Connect

The draft version of this report presented updated Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) probabilistic seismic hazard analysis estimates for 69 nuclear power plant sites in the region of the United States east of the Rocky Mountains. LLNL performed a re-elicitation of seismicity and ground motion experts to improve their estimates of uncertainty in seismicity parameters and ground motion models. Using these revised inputs, LLNL updated the seismic hazard estimates documented in NUREG/CR-5250 (1989). These updated hazard estimates will be used in future NRC actions. The draft was issued for public comment in October 1993. By the end of the public comment period, February 28, 1994, comments had been received from two nuclear industry companies. The comments from these companies neither contested nor suggested amendments to the technical data conveyed in the report. Rather, they both suggest changes in the Individual Plant External Event Examination (IPEEE) program scope. This report is not the forum for discussion of the IPEEE program. Possible modification to the scope of the IPEEE will be examined in its own setting. Therefore, there are no technical differences between the draft report and this final report. Any information as to modifications to the IPEEE program will be provided to the public via an NRC general communication.

Sobel, P.

1994-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

100

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July 2013 July 2013 Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Livermore Field Office (LFO) and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Site 200 preparedness for severe natural phenomena events (NPEs). The HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations performed this review to evaluate the processes for identifying emergency response capabilities and maintaining them in a state of readiness in case of a severe NPE. This

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "llnl livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Independent Oversight Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at the Livermore Site Office, October 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Enforcement and Oversight Independent Oversight Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at the Livermore Site Office October 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Scope ................................................................................................................................................ 1

102

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory opens High Performance...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

06302011 | NR-11-06-08 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory opens High Performance Computing Innovation Center for collaboration with industry Donald B Johnston, LLNL,...

103

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

a review of nuclear safety programs at the DOE Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) from October through November 2009. The review was performed by the HSS Office of...

104

LLNL-TR-534931 Doppler Broadening Update  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

LLNL-TR-534931 Doppler Broadening Update: Broadening near the Unresolved Resonance Region.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. #12;3 LLNL version of this paper: John Scorby (LLNL), Robert MacFarlane (LANL), Maurice Greene (ORNL), S. Ganesan

Cullen, Red

105

Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- February 2009  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Inspection of Emergency Management at the Livermore Site Office and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

106

Energy conservation and management plan for plant facilities at the Livermore site  

SciTech Connect

An energy conservation and management plan for the Livermore site of the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory is presented. The plan defines the energy-conservation goals for the next 10 years and proposes the ways and means of attaining them. The main features contained in this plan are as follows: development of the criteria and underlying assumptions required for long range planning, including energy growth rates and the case for using the concept of the technical-fix energy growth rate, LLL energy outlook and fuel cost projections, and life-cycle-cost criteria; targets of the long-range plan include between 1975 and 1985, an annual energy usage growth equal to 5.8 percent of the 1975 energy consumption, 1985 and thereafter, zero energy growth, a change from the current dependence on natural gas to the use of other fuels for heating, and a doubling of the 30-day strategic oil storage capacity; and cost schedule for the next 10 years.

Ng, W.; Szybalski, S.; Kerr, W. H.; Meyer, H. J.

1976-03-15T23:59:59.000Z

107

TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF SOIL REMEDIATION ALTERNATIVES AT THE BUILDING 812 OPERABLE UNIT, LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY SITE 300  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy Livermore Site Office requested a technical review of remedial alternatives proposed for the Building 812 Operable Unit, Site 300 at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The team visited the site and reviewed the alternatives proposed for soil remediation in the draft RI/FS and made the following observations and recommendations. Based on the current information available for the site, the team did not identify a single technology that would be cost effective and/or ecologically sound to remediate DU contamination at Building 812 to current remedial goals. Soil washing is not a viable alternative and should not be considered at the site unless final remediation levels can be negotiated to significantly higher levels. This recommendation is based on the results of soil washing treatability studies at Fernald and Ashtabula that suggest that the technology would only be effective to address final remediation levels higher than 50 pCi/g. The technical review team identified four areas of technical uncertainty that should be resolved before the final selection of a preferred remedial strategy is made. Areas of significant technical uncertainty that should be addressed include: (1) Better delineation of the spatial distribution of surface contamination and the vertical distribution of subsurface contamination in the area of the firing table and associated alluvial deposits; (2) Chemical and physical characterization of residual depleted uranium (DU) at the site; (3) Determination of actual contaminant concentrations in air particulates to support risk modeling; and (4) More realistic estimation of cost for remedial alternatives, including soil washing, that were derived primarily from vendor estimates. Instead of conducting the planned soil washing treatability study, the team recommends that the site consider a new phased approach that combines additional characterization approaches and technologies to address the technical uncertainty in the remedial decision making. The site should redo the risk calculations as the future use scenario has changed for the site. As a result, the existing model is based on very conservative assumptions that result in calculation of unreasonably low cleanup goals. Specifically, the review team proposes that LLNL consider: (1) Revising the industrial worker scenario to a reasonable maximum exposure (RME) for a site worker that performs a weekly walk down of the area for two hours for 25 years (or an alternative RME if the exposure scenario changes); (2) Revising the ESSI of 2 mg U per kg soil for the deer mouse to account for less than 0.05 of the total ingested uranium being adsorbed by the gut; (3) Revising bioaccumulation factors (BAFs) for vegetation and invertebrates that are based on 100 mg of soluble uranium per kg of soil, as the uranium concentration in the slope soil does not average 100 mg/kg and it is not all in a soluble form; and (4) Measuring actual contaminant concentrations in air particulates at the site and using the actual values to support risk calculations. The team recommends that the site continue a phased approach during remediation. The activities should focus on elimination of the principal threats to groundwater by excavating (1) source material from the firing table and alluvial deposits, and (2) soil hotspots from the surrounding slopes with concentrations of U-235 and U-238 that pose unacceptable risk. This phased approach allows the remediation path to be driven by the results of each phase. This reduces the possibility of costly 'surprises', such as failure of soil treatment, and reduces the impact of remediation on endangered habitat. Treatment of the excavated material with physical separation equipment may result in a decreased volume of soil for disposal if the DU is concentrated in the fine-grained fraction, which can then be disposed of in an offsite facility at a considerable cost savings. Based on existing data and a decision to implement the recommended phased approach, the cost of characterization, excavation and physical

Eddy-Dilek, C.; Miles, D.; Abitz, R.

2009-08-14T23:59:59.000Z

108

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2011 September 2011 Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The purpose of this review was to assess the effectiveness of the integrated safety management system (ISMS) established and implemented by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2011 More Documents & Publications Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Technical Appendices, Volume II, December 2004 Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,

109

Lawrence Livermore National Laborotory Safety Basis Assessment Final February 11, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Safety Basis Assessment INTRODUCTION This site visit report documents the collective results of the review of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) safety basis processes and discusses its scope, objective, results and conclusions. Appendix A provides lists of the documents, interviews, and observations and Appendix B includes the plan for the review. This combined assessment was sponsored by the National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA) Livermore Site Office (LSO) and conducted jointly by staff from the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) and LSO. The review was conducted in late 2010 and included site visits from November 29 - December 3, 2010 and December 13-17, 2010. Overall, the LLNL programs

110

Lawrence Livermore National Laborotory Safety Basis Assessment Final February 11, 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Safety Basis Assessment INTRODUCTION This site visit report documents the collective results of the review of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) safety basis processes and discusses its scope, objective, results and conclusions. Appendix A provides lists of the documents, interviews, and observations and Appendix B includes the plan for the review. This combined assessment was sponsored by the National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA) Livermore Site Office (LSO) and conducted jointly by staff from the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) and LSO. The review was conducted in late 2010 and included site visits from November 29 - December 3, 2010 and December 13-17, 2010. Overall, the LLNL programs

111

LLNL-TR-446331 ENDF Cross Sections are not  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

LLNL-TR-446331 ENDF Cross Sections are not Uniquely Defined by Dermott E. Cullen Lawrence Livermore Technical Information Department's Digital Library http://www.llnl.gov/tid/Library.html #12;1 LLNL-TR-446331/NEA Data Bank), Pavel Oblozinsky (BNL, Retired), Ernest Plechaty (LLNL, retired), Andrej Trkov (IJS). Last

Cullen, Red

112

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Operational Drill at the B332 Plutonium Facility  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

HSS Independent Activity Report - Rev. 0 Report Number: HIAR LLNL-2013-02-27 Site: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Operational Drill at the B332 Plutonium Facility Date of Activity: 02/27/2013 Report Preparer: Thomas Rogers Activity Description/Purpose: The Livermore Site Office (LSO) and Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS) requested personnel from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (HS-45) to observe an operational drill at the Plutonium Facility in Building 332 (B332). LSO and LLNS desired HS-45's participation to help

113

Historical Doses from Tritiated Water and Tritiated Hydrogen Gas Released to the Atmosphere from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). Part 5. Accidental Releases  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Over the course of fifty-three years, LLNL had six acute releases of tritiated hydrogen gas (HT) and one acute release of tritiated water vapor (HTO) that were too large relative to the annual releases to be included as part of the annual releases from normal operations detailed in Parts 3 and 4 of the Tritium Dose Reconstruction (TDR). Sandia National Laboratories/California (SNL/CA) had one such release of HT and one of HTO. Doses to the maximally exposed individual (MEI) for these accidents have been modeled using an equation derived from the time-dependent tritium model, UFOTRI, and parameter values based on expert judgment. All of these acute releases are described in this report. Doses that could not have been exceeded from the large HT releases of 1965 and 1970 were calculated to be 43 {micro}Sv (4.3 mrem) and 120 {micro}Sv (12 mrem) to an adult, respectively. Two published sets of dose predictions for the accidental HT release in 1970 are compared with the dose predictions of this TDR. The highest predicted dose was for an acute release of HTO in 1954. For this release, the dose that could not have been exceeded was estimated to have been 2 mSv (200 mrem), although, because of the high uncertainty about the predictions, the likely dose may have been as low as 360 {micro}Sv (36 mrem) or less. The estimated maximum exposures from the accidental releases were such that no adverse health effects would be expected. Appendix A lists all accidents and large routine puff releases that have occurred at LLNL and SNL/CA between 1953 and 2005. Appendix B describes the processes unique to tritium that must be modeled after an acute release, some of the time-dependent tritium models being used today, and the results of tests of these models.

Peterson, S

2007-08-15T23:59:59.000Z

114

Oversight Reports - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Oversight Reports - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory October 2, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 Review of the Fire Protection Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory July 19, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July 2013 Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory April 12, 2013 Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - February 2013 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Operational Drill at the B332 Plutonium Facility [HIAR LLNL-2013-02-27] December 18, 2012 Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -

115

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Review Reports 2013 Independent Oversight Review of the Fire Protection Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, September 2013 Independent Oversight Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, July 2013 Activity Reports 2013 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Operational Drill at the B332 Plutonium Facility, February 2013 Activity Reports 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site Lead Planning Activities, October 2012 Review Reports 2011 Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at the Livermore Site Office, October 2011 Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, September 2011

116

Donald Frederick, LLNL  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Donald Donald Frederick, LLNL - Presented at Supercomputing '11 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P. O. Box 808, Livermore, CA 94551! Case Study: Beyond Homogeneous Decomposition with Qbox Scaling Long-Range Forces on Massively Parallel Systems LLNL---PRES---508651 Case S tudy: O utline * Problem D escripBon * ComputaBonal A pproach * Changes f or S caling LLNL---PRES---508651 Computer s imulaBons o f m aterials Computer s imulaBons a re w idely used t o p redict t he p roperBes o f new m aterials o r u nderstand t he properBes o f e xisBng o nes LLNL---PRES---508651 SimulaBon o f M aterials f rom F irst--- Principles First---principles m ethods: Calculate p roperBes o f a g iven m aterial d irectly f rom fundamental p hysics e quaBons. * No e mpirical p arameters Can m ake p redic-ons a bout c

117

Lawrence Livermore engineering team makes breakthrough in solar...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Allan Chang and Mihail Bora. Lawrence Livermore engineering team makes breakthrough in solar energy research Kenneth K Ma, LLNL, (925)-423-7602, ma28@llnl.gov High Resolution...

118

LLNL SF6 Program Update - 2013  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

LLNL-PRES-617973 This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. Lawrence...

119

Livermore and Russian scientists propose new names for elements...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

was named after Flerov - Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions (FLNR). Livermorium (atomic symbol Lv) was chosen to honor Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and...

120

Lawrence Livermore teams with industry to advance energy technologies...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

release: 03192012 | NR-12-03-01 Lawrence Livermore teams with industry to advance energy technologies using high performance computing Donald B Johnston , LLNL, (925)...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "llnl livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Lawrence Livermore increases contracts awarded to small businesses...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

standing in front of the NIF diagnostics that she works on. Photos by Julie KorhummelLLNL Lawrence Livermore increases contracts awarded to small businesses for third straight...

122

Title I conceptual design for Pit 6 landfill closure at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site 300  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The objective of this design project is to evaluate and prepare design and construction documents for a closure cover cap for the Pit 6 Landfill located at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site 300. This submittal constitutes the Title I Design (Conceptual Design) for the closure cover of the Pit 6 Landfill. A Title I Design is generally 30 percent of the design effort. Title H Design takes the design to 100 percent complete. Comments and edits to this Title I Design will be addressed in the Title II design submittal. Contents of this report are as follows: project background; design issues and engineering approach; design drawings; calculation packages; construction specifications outline; and construction quality assurance plan outline.

MacDonnell, B.A.; Obenauf, K.S. [Golder Associates, Inc., Alameda, CA (United States)

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

123

Correlation between predicted and observed levels of airborne tritium at Lawrence Livermore Laboratory site boundary  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

At the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, a computer code based on the Gaussian plume model is used to estimate radiation doses from routine or accidental release of airborne radioactive material. Routine releases of tritium have been used as a test of the overall uncertainty associated with these estimates. The ration of concentration to release rate at distances from the two principal release points to each of six site boundary sampling locations has been calcuated using local meteorological data. The concentration of airborne tritiated water vapor is continuously measured at the six sampling stations as part of the Laboratory's environmental monitoring program. Comparison of predicted with observed annual tritiated water concentrations in 1978 showed an average ratio of 2.6 with a range of from 0.97 to 5.8.

Lindeken, C.L.; Silver, W.J.; Toy, A.J.; White, J.H.

1980-02-19T23:59:59.000Z

124

LLNL Site plan for a MOX fuel lead assembly mission in support of surplus plutonium disposition  

SciTech Connect

The principal facilities that LLNL would use to support a MOX Fuel Lead Assembly Mission are Building 332 and Building 334. Both of these buildings are within the security boundary known as the LLNL Superblock. Building 332 is the LLNL Plutonium Facility. As an operational plutonium facility, it has all the infrastructure and support services required for plutonium operations. The LLNL Plutonium Facility routinely handles kilogram quantities of plutonium and uranium. Currently, the building is limited to a plutonium inventory of 700 kilograms and a uranium inventory of 300 kilograms. Process rooms (excluding the vaults) are limited to an inventory of 20 kilograms per room. Ongoing operations include: receiving SSTS, material receipt, storage, metal machining and casting, welding, metal-to-oxide conversion, purification, molten salt operations, chlorination, oxide calcination, cold pressing and sintering, vitrification, encapsulation, chemical analysis, metallography and microprobe analysis, waste material processing, material accountability measurements, packaging, and material shipping. Building 334 is the Hardened Engineering Test Building. This building supports environmental and radiation measurements on encapsulated plutonium and uranium components. Other existing facilities that would be used to support a MOX Fuel Lead Assembly Mission include Building 335 for hardware receiving and storage and TRU and LLW waste storage and shipping facilities, and Building 331 or Building 241 for storage of depleted uranium.

Bronson, M.C.

1997-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

125

Livermore Scientists Team with Russia to Discover Element 118  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

"Synthesis of the isotopes of elements 118 and 116" (Abstract) "Synthesis of the isotopes of elements 118 and 116" (Abstract) Physical Review C, October 9, 2006 Livermore Scientists Team With Russia To Discover Elements 113 and 115 LLNL News Release, February. 2, 2004 "Present at the Creation" Science & Technology Review, January/February 2002 Island of Stability NOVA Science Now, September 2006 Social Media Logos Follow LLNL on YouTube Subscribe to LLNL's RSS feed Follow LLNL on Facebook Follow LLNL on Twitter Follow LLNL on Flickr Contact: Anne M. Stark Phone: (925) 422-9799 E-mail: stark8l@llnl.gov FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE October 16, 2006 NR-06-10-03 Livermore scientists team with Russia to discover element 118 LIVERMORE, Calif. - Scientists from the Chemistry, Materials and Life Sciences Directorate at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, in

126

Safety Basis Requirements for Nonnuclear Facilities at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site-Specific Work Smart Standard Revision 3 December 2006  

SciTech Connect

This standard establishes requirements that, when coupled with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL's) Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) methods and other Work Smart Standards for assuring worker safety, assure that the impacts of nonnuclear operations authorized in LLNL facilities are well understood and controlled in a manner that protects the health of workers, the public, and the environment. All LLNL facilities shall be classified based on potential for adverse impact of operations to the health of co-located (i.e., nearby) workers and the public in accordance with this standard, Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 830, Subpart B, and Department of Energy Order (DOE O) 420.2A.

Beach, D; Brereton, S; Failor, R; Hildum, J; Ingram, C; Spagnolo, S; van Warmerdam, C

2007-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

127

LLNL-CONF-400422 Tracking Non-rigid Structures in  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

LLNL-CONF-400422 Tracking Non-rigid Structures in Computer Simulations A. Gezahegne, C. Kamath. Rep. UCRL-TR- 223676, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 2006, http://www.llnl National Labora- tory, 2007, http://www.llnl.gov/casc/sapphire/pubs/TR- 236111-Rev-1.pdf. #12;

Kamath, Chandrika

128

LLNL-JRNL-409341 A New Approach for Solving Stokes  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

LLNL-JRNL-409341 A New Approach for Solving Stokes Systems Arising From a Distributive Relaxation. The work of the first author was partially supported by LLNL and by NSF grant DMS-0713125. 1 #12, Livermore, CA 94550, U.S.A. E-mail address: panayot@llnl.gov Department of Mathematical Sciences, University

Zhang, Shangyou

129

It's only natural: Lawrence Livermore helps find link to  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 For immediate release: 03/04/2013 | NR-13-03-01 It's only natural: Lawrence Livermore helps find link to arsenic-contaminated groundwater Anne M Stark, LLNL, (925) 422-9799, stark8@llnl.gov Printer-friendly Hand pump at a community well of a sampling site in Bangladesh. Human activities are not the primary cause of arsenic found in groundwater in Bangladesh. Instead, a team of researchers from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Barnard College, Columbia University, University of Dhaka, Desert Research Institute and University of Tennessee found that the arsenic in groundwater in the region is part of a natural process that predates any recent human activity, such as intensive pumping. The results appear in the March 4 edition of the Proceedings of the

130

Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

at the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in June 2002. The inspection was performed as a joint effort by the OA Office of...

131

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review, Lawrence Livermore National Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - December 2009 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - December 2009 December 2009 Review of Nuclear Safety at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed a review of nuclear safety programs at the DOE Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) from October through November 2009. The review was performed by the HSS Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Evaluations. LLNL has made significant progress in establishing and implementing comprehensive programs to effectively manage nuclear safety. LLNL has devoted considerable management attention and resources to enhance nuclear

132

Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - May 2007 Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - May 2007 May 2007 Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Programs at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an inspection of environment, safety, and health (ES&H) programs at the DOE Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) during January and February 2007. The inspection was performed by Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations. LSO's oversight has matured, and operational awareness and assessments have improved in gathering data and identifying deficiencies. LSO

133

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2000-12 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2000-12 September 27, 2000 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to the University of California related to Authorization Basis Issues at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, (EA-2000-12) This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) investigation of the facts and circumstances concerning Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) maintenance and adherence to documents, which form the Authorization Basis (AB) for the Laboratory's nuclear facilities. Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2000-12 More Documents & Publications Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - November 5,

134

LLNL scientists find precipitation, global warming link  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4 4 For immediate release: 11/11/2013 | NR-13-11-04 Lawrence Livermore scientists have found that observed changes in global precipitation are directly affected by human activities. LLNL scientists find precipitation, global warming link Anne M Stark, LLNL, (925) 422-9799, stark8@llnl.gov LIVERMORE, Calif. -- The rain in Spain may lie mainly on the plain, but the location and intensity of that rain is changing not only in Spain but around the globe. A new study by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory scientists shows that observed changes in global (ocean and land) precipitation are directly affected by human activities and cannot be explained by natural variability alone. The research appears in the Nov. 11 online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

135

Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Volume I - December 2004 Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Volume I - December 2004 December 2004 Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA), within the Office of Security and Safety Performance Assurance (SSA), conducted an inspection of environment, safety, and health (ES&H) at the DOE Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) during October and November 2004. The inspection was performed by the OA Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations. LSO and LLNL have established ISM systems that are conceptually sound but

136

Science at LLNL with IBM Blue Gene/Q  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) has a long history of working with IBM on Blue Gene supercomputers. Beginning in November 2001 with the joint announcement of a partnership to expand the Blue Gene research project (including Blue Gene/L ...

B. Carnes, B. Chan, E. W. Draeger, J.-L. Fattebert, L. Fried, J. Glosli, W. D. Krauss, S. H. Langer, R. McCallen, A. A. Mirin, F. Najjar, A. L. Nichols, T. Oppelstrup, J. A. Rathkopf, D. Richards, F. Streitz, P. M. Vranas, J. J. Rice, J. A. Gunnels, V. Gurev, C. Kim, J. Magerlein, M. Reumann, H.-F. Wen

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

137

Hazardous-waste analysis plan for LLNL operations  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is involved in many facets of research ranging from nuclear weapons research to advanced Biomedical studies. Approximately 80% of all programs at LLNL generate hazardous waste in one form or another. Aside from producing waste from industrial type operations (oils, solvents, bottom sludges, etc.) many unique and toxic wastes are generated such as phosgene, dioxin (TCDD), radioactive wastes and high explosives. One key to any successful waste management program must address the following: proper identification of the waste, safe handling procedures and proper storage containers and areas. This section of the Waste Management Plan will address methodologies used for the Analysis of Hazardous Waste. In addition to the wastes defined in 40 CFR 261, LLNL and Site 300 also generate radioactive waste not specifically covered by RCRA. However, for completeness, the Waste Analysis Plan will address all hazardous waste.

Roberts, R.S.

1982-02-12T23:59:59.000Z

138

Corporate Functional Management Evaluation of the LLNL Radiation Safety Organization  

SciTech Connect

A Corporate Assess, Improve, and Modernize review was conducted at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) to evaluate the LLNL Radiation Safety Program and recommend actions to address the conditions identified in the Internal Assessment conducted July 23-25, 2007. This review confirms the findings of the Internal Assessment of the Institutional Radiation Safety Program (RSP) including the noted deficiencies and vulnerabilities to be valid. The actions recommended are a result of interviews with about 35 individuals representing senior management through the technician level. The deficiencies identified in the LLNL Internal Assessment of the Institutional Radiation Safety Program were discussed with Radiation Safety personnel team leads, customers of Radiation Safety Program, DOE Livermore site office, and senior ES&H management. There are significant issues with the RSP. LLNL RSP is not an integrated, cohesive, consistently implemented program with a single authority that has the clear roll and responsibility and authority to assure radiological operations at LLNL are conducted in a safe and compliant manner. There is no institutional commitment to address the deficiencies that are identified in the internal assessment. Some of these deficiencies have been previously identified and corrective actions have not been taken or are ineffective in addressing the issues. Serious funding and staffing issues have prevented addressing previously identified issues in the Radiation Calibration Laboratory, Internal Dosimetry, Bioassay Laboratory, and the Whole Body Counter. There is a lack of technical basis documentation for the Radiation Calibration Laboratory and an inadequate QA plan that does not specify standards of work. The Radiation Safety Program lack rigor and consistency across all supported programs. The implementation of DOE Standard 1098-99 Radiological Control can be used as a tool to establish this consistency across LLNL. The establishment of a site wide ALARA Committee and administrative control levels would focus attention on improved processes. Currently LLNL issues dosimeters to a large number of employees and visitors that do not enter areas requiring dosimetry. This includes 25,000 visitor TLDs per year. Dosimeters should be issued to only those personnel who enter areas where dosimetry is required.

Sygitowicz, L S

2008-03-20T23:59:59.000Z

139

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - August 22,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August August 22, 1996 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - August 22, 1996 August 22, 1996 Issued to the University of California related to Radiological Worker Training Deficiencies at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL) report of a potential noncompliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection). This potential noncompliance involved the failure to complete required radiological worker retraining for 49 percent of LLNL's approximately 700 radiological workers. The training issue was initially identified on May 6, 1996, by LLNL during a routine review of the Chemistry and Materials Science deficiency

140

Public Affairs Office: Livermore Lab Physicist Dates Lifetime of Solar  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Dating the Solar System: Where Were You When the Solar System Was Being Formed? Dating the Solar System: Where Were You When the Solar System Was Being Formed? Chemistry & Materials Science Directorate, LLNL Chronology of the early Solar System from chondrule-bearing calcium-aluminium-rich inclusions Nature, April 21, 2005 Building Planets at PSI: The Origin of the Solar System Planetary Science Institute Social Media Logos Follow LLNL on YouTube Subscribe to LLNL's RSS feed Follow LLNL on Facebook Follow LLNL on Twitter Follow LLNL on Flickr Contact: Anne M. Stark Phone: (925) 422-9799 E-mail: stark8@llnl.gov FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 20, 2005 NR-05-04-02 Livermore Lab physicist dates lifetime of solar nebula at two million years LIVERMORE, Calif. - The oxygen and magnesium content of some of the oldest objects in the universe are giving clues to the lifetime of the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "llnl livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Review of the Lawrence Livermore Nationa Laboratory Identiified Defective Department of Transportation Hazardous Material Packages  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 Site Visit Report - Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Identified Defective Department of Transportation Hazardous Material Packages This site visit report documents the results of Office of Health, Safety and Security's review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) identification, immediate actions, communications, documentation, evaluation, reporting and follow-up to the discovery of defective Department of Transportation (DOT) UN1A2 55- and 30-gallon open head single bolt closure steel drums intended for storage and transportation of hazardous waste and materials. This review, conducted on January 26-29, 2010, was sponsored by the DOE Livermore Site Office (LSO) to support interface with the lab and this report is intended to support follow-up

142

LLNL-TR-548633 ENDF/B-VII.1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

LLNL-TR-548633 ENDF/B-VII.1 versus ENDFB/-VII.0: What's Different? by Dermott E. Cullen Lawrence by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. #12;3 LLNL-TR-548633 ENDF/B-VII.1 that has been incorporated in the final version of this paper: John Scorby (LLNL), Maurice Greene (ORNL), S

Cullen, Red

143

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Livermore National Laboratory Livermore National Laboratory (Redirected from Lawrence Livermore National Lab) Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Name Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Address 7000 East Ave. Place Livermore, California Zip 94550-9234 Number of employees 5001-10,000 Year founded 1952 Notes LLNL-WEB-422768 Coordinates 37.6798282°, -121.7107786° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":37.6798282,"lon":-121.7107786,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

144

Assessment of Eligibility to National Register of Historic Places Building 431 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) proposes to demolish the original sections of Building 431 at its main site in Livermore, California. As this action will constitute an undertaking within the regulatory constraints of the National Historic Preservation Act, LLNL arranged for an assessment of the building's historic significance. This report provides a brief history of the magnetic fusion energy research activities housed in Building 431 and a historic assessment of the building. The final recommendation of the report is that, although Building 431 housed some significant breakthroughs in accelerator technology and magnetic mirror plasma confinement, it lacks integrity for the periods of significance of those developments. It is, therefore, not eligible to the National Register of Historic Places.

Sullivan, M A; Ullrich, R A

2003-05-07T23:59:59.000Z

145

Lawrence Livermore and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute scientists set a  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 6 For immediate release: 04/30/2013 | NR-13-04-06 Lawrence Livermore and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute scientists set a new simulation speed record on the Sequoia supercomputer Donald B Johnston, LLNL, (925) 423-4902, johnston19@llnl.gov Printer-friendly Lawrence Livermore scientists, from left, David Jefferson and Peter Barnes. Photo by Laura Schulz and Meg Epperly/LLNL High Resolution Image Computer scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute have set a high performance computing speed record that opens the way to the scientific exploration of complex planetary-scale systems. In a paper to be published in May, the joint team will announce a record-breaking simulation speed of 504 billion events per second on LLNL's

146

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Federal Facility Compliance Order, February 24, 1997 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Facility Compliance Act Order for Lawrence Federal Facility Compliance Act Order for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Compliance Order HWCA 96/97-5002 State California Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) FFCAct Scope Summary Require compliance by the DOE with a Site Treatment Plan for the treatment of mixed waste at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Parties DOE; State of California Environmental Protection Agency (Department of Toxic Substances Control) Date 2/24/1997 SCOPE * Require compliance by the DOE with a Site Treatment Plan for the treatment of mixed waste at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. * Address LDR requirements pertaining to storage and treatment of covered waste at LLNL. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * The Compliance Plan Volume of the STP provides overall schedules for achieving

147

LLNL-JRNL-410333 The Role of the n=1 Column  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

LLNL-JRNL-410333 The Role of the n=1 Column Mode in Spheromak Formation Bruce Cohen, Carlos Romero Livermore National Laboratory under contracts DE-AC52-07NA27344. LLNL-JRNL-410333 #12;2 I. INTRODUCTION to interface NIMROD with VisIt and W. H. Meyer for assistance implementing the Python script at LLNL

148

LLNL-TR-461199 A Short History of ENDF/B  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

LLNL-TR-461199 A Short History of ENDF/B Unresolved Resonance Parameters by Dermott E. Cullen://www.ntis.gov/ OR Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Technical Information Department's Digital Library http://www.llnl.gov/tid/Library.html #12;3 LLNL-TR-461199 A Short History of ENDF/B Unresolved Resonance Parameters by Dermott E. Cullen

Cullen, Red

149

Lawrence Livermore to build advanced laser system in Czech Republic  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

9-06 9-06 For immediate release: 09/17/2013 | NR-13-09-06 High Resolution Image The High Repetition-Rate Advanced Petawatt Laser System, or HAPLS, will be designed, developed, assembled and tested at Lawrence Livermore. It will be transferred to the ELI Beamlines facility in 2016, where it will be commissioned for use by the international scientific community. Lawrence Livermore to build advanced laser system in Czech Republic Breanna Bishop, LLNL, (925) 423-9802, bishop33@llnl.gov High Resolution Image Artist renderings of the ELI Beamlines facility, currently under construction in the Czech Republic. High Resolution Image A CAD image of the ELI-HAPLS laser. LIVERMORE, Calif. - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), through Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC (LLNS), has been awarded more than

150

LLNL Energy Flow Charts | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

LLNL Energy Flow Charts LLNL Energy Flow Charts Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary Name: LLNL Energy Flow Charts Agency/Company /Organization: Lawrence Livermore National Lab Sector: Energy Focus Area: Renewable Energy Topics: Pathways analysis References: LLNL Energy Flow Charts [1] Decision makers have long recognized the importance of visualizing energy and material flows in a way that distinguishes between resources, transformations and services. Research priorities can be defined in terms of changes to the flows, and the consequences of policy or technology shifts can be traced both upstream and downstream. The usefulness of this top-down view is limited by the level of detail that can be conveyed in a single image. We use two techniques to balance information content with readability. First we employe visualization

151

Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SW/SPEIS Chapter 4 - Description of the Existing Environment SW/SPEIS Chapter 4 - Description of the Existing Environment March 2005 4.9-9 TABLE 4.9.3-1.-Federal and California Species with Protected or Sensitive Status Known to Occur at the Livermore Site and Site 300 in 2001 and 2002 Site Status Common Name Livermore Site Site 300 Federal Status Code State Status Code Plants Big tarplant a - X - CNPS List 1 B Hogwallow starfish - X - CNPS List 4 Large-flowered fiddleneck - X FE (CH) CNPS List 1 B Round-leaved filaree - X - CNPS List 2 Stinkbells - X - CNPS List 4 Diamond-petaled poppy - X FSC CNPS List 1 B Gypsum rock jasmine - X - CNPS List 4 Gypsum loving larkspur - X - CNPS List 4 Invertebrates Valley elderberry longhorn beetle - X FT - California linderiella fairy shrimp - X FSC - Amphibians

152

LLNL Director Search  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Integration Directorate Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory John Edwards Associate NIF Director for ICF & HED NIF & Photon Science Directorate Lawrence Livermore National...

153

California utilities partner with Lawrence Livermore to improve state's  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2-12-04 2-12-04 For immediate release: 12/20/2012 | NR-12-12-04 California utilities partner with Lawrence Livermore to improve state's energy grid Lynda L Seaver, LLNL, (925) 423-3103, seaver1@llnl.gov Printer-friendly California utilities will use the advanced technologies and expertise of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory to improve the efficiency, security and safety of the state's utility systems under an agreement approved today by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). The CPUC approved funding of a five-year research and development agreement between Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Southern California Edison Company and San Diego Gas and Electric Company, and Lawrence Livermore (LLNL) that will provide the utilities with access to LLNL technological

154

Record simulations conducted on Lawrence Livermore supercomputer  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 5 For immediate release: 03/19/2013 | NR-13-03-05 Record simulations conducted on Lawrence Livermore supercomputer Breanna Bishop, LLNL, (925) 423-9802, bishop33@llnl.gov Printer-friendly OSIRIS simulation on Sequoia of the interaction of a fast-ignition-scale laser with a dense DT plasma. The laser field is shown in green, the blue arrows illustrate the magnetic field lines at the plasma interface and the red/yellow spheres are the laser-accelerated electrons that will heat and ignite the fuel. High Resolution Image LIVERMORE, Calif. -- Researchers at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory have performed record simulations using all 1,572,864 cores of Sequoia, the largest supercomputer in the world. Sequoia, based on IBM BlueGene/Q architecture, is the first machine to exceed one million computational

155

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

racks "Green" supercomputer reduces energy footprint by 75% "Green" supercomputer reduces energy footprint by 75% Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National...

156

Lawrence Livermore National Security Enforcement Letter (NEL-2013-03)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Penrose C. Albright Penrose C. Albright Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 July 22, 2013 President and Laboratory Director Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 7000 East Avenue Livermore, California 94550 NEL-2013-03 Dear Dr. Albright: The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight has evaluated the facts and circumstances surrounding programmatic deficiencies identified in the Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS) software quality assurance (SQA) program. LLNS reported these deficiencies on January 16, 2013, in Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report NTS--LSO-LLNL-LLNL- 2013-0001, LLNL Software Quality Assurance Program Does Not Meet DOE 0 414.1 D Standards and Procedures Requirements.

157

Electromagnetic Imaging of CO2 Sequestration at an Enhanced Oil Recovery Site  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Electromagnetic Imaging of CO Electromagnetic Imaging of CO 2 Sequestration at an Enhanced Oil Recovery Site Barry Kirkendall (Kirkendall1@llnl.gov ; 925-423-1513) Jeff Roberts (Roberts17@llnl.gov ; 925-422-7108) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 7000 East Avenue Livermore, CA 94550 1.1 Introduction Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) is currently involved in a long term study using time-lapse multiple frequency electromagnetic (EM) characterization at a waterflood enhanced oil recovery (EOR) site in California operated by Chevron Heavy Oil Division in Lost Hills, California (Figure 1). The petroleum industry's interest and the successful imaging results from this project suggest that this technique be extended to monitor CO 2 sequestration at an EOR site also operated by Chevron. The impetus for this study is

158

Researcher, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | National...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Christian Marois, a former LLNL postdoc now at NRC Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics in Canada was the other lead author. Learn more about these publications off site link ....

159

LLNL Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI) | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

LLNL Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI) LLNL Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI) Jump to: navigation, search Name LLNL Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI) Agency/Company /Organization Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Sector Energy, Land Topics Pathways analysis References LLNL Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI)[1] Abstract Established in 1989, the Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI) is an International focal point for understanding climate change and analyzing and diagnosing the performance of the world's climate models; the PCMDI is a DOE program located at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The PCMDI mission is to develop improved methods and tools for the diagnosis ...

160

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: Social Media  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Social Media Social Media By staying on the cutting edge of Web communication, the News Center at LLNL reaches out to the media and the public through a variety of social media and multimedia Websites: Flickr An image- and video-hosting Website. Visit now and view the LLNL photostream in a variety of formats. Twitter A microblogging service. Sign up today and get short, tiimely messages about the Livermore Lab. Facebook A social-networking Website with more than 500 million active users. Enlist now to become a "friend" of LLNL. RSS A Web-feed service that sends content to subscribers automatically. Enroll at once to get the latest LLNL headlines. Utube A video-sharing Website. Navigate here to immediately watch the latest in cutting-edge science and technology at the Laboratory.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "llnl livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Summary Summary Prepared by: COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration TITLE: Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0348 and DOE/EIS-0236-S3) CONTACT: For further information on this EIS, For general information on the DOE Call: 1-877-388-4930, or contact National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, write or call: Thomas Grim Carol Borgstrom, Director Livermore Site Office Document Manager Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance NNSA (EH-42) 7000 East Avenue U.S. Department of Energy MS L-293 1000 Independence Avenue, SW

162

Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

I I Chapters 1 through 12 Prepared by: COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration TITLE: Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0348 and DOE/EIS-0236-S3) CONTACT: For further information on this EIS, For general information on the DOE Call: 1-877-388-4930, or contact National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, write or call: Thomas Grim Carol Borgstrom, Director Livermore Site Office Document Manager Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance NNSA (EH-42) 7000 East Avenue U.S. Department of Energy

163

Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

III III Appendix E through P Prepared by: COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration TITLE: Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0348 and DOE/EIS-0236-S3) CONTACT: For further information on this EIS, For general information on the DOE Call: 1-877-388-4930, or contact National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, write or call: Thomas Grim Carol Borgstrom, Director Livermore Site Office Document Manager Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance NNSA (EH-42) 7000 East Avenue U.S. Department of Energy

164

Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

II II Appendix A through D Prepared by: COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration TITLE: Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0348 and DOE/EIS-0236-S3) CONTACT: For further information on this EIS, For general information on the DOE Call: 1-877-388-4930, or contact National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, write or call: Thomas Grim Carol Borgstrom, Director Livermore Site Office Document Manager Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance NNSA (EH-42) 7000 East Avenue U.S. Department of Energy

165

Consent Order, Lawrence Livermore National National Security, LLC -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National National Security, LLC - Lawrence Livermore National National Security, LLC - WCO-2010-01 Consent Order, Lawrence Livermore National National Security, LLC - WCO-2010-01 October 29, 2010 Consent Order issued to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC for deficiencies associated with the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program This letter refers to the Office of Health, Safety and Security, Office of Enforcement investigation into deficiencies associated with the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program (CBDPP) and related work planning and control processes. The results of the investigation were provided to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS) in an Investigation Report dated July 7, 2009. An

166

Gap Analysis Comparing LLNL ISMS and ISO 14001  

SciTech Connect

A gap analysis was conducted comparing the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) with the international standard ISO 14001 Environmental Management System and with Department of Energy (DOE) Order 450.1. This analysis was accomplished as part of LLNL's assessment of the impacts of adopting DOE Order 450.1 and comprises a portion of its continuous improvement efforts under ISMS.

Doerr, T B

2004-08-09T23:59:59.000Z

167

LLNL Slide Master  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Collaborators: JN Glosli, RQ Hood, DA Orlikowski, P. Sderlind, M. Tang , C. Wu and LH Yang (LLNL) ... DE-AC52-07NA27344 LLNL-PRES-443673 ...

2010-08-05T23:59:59.000Z

168

Energy Innovations from Livermore Lab to Power Hawaiian Nonprofit |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Innovations from Livermore Lab to Power Hawaiian Nonprofit Innovations from Livermore Lab to Power Hawaiian Nonprofit Energy Innovations from Livermore Lab to Power Hawaiian Nonprofit February 28, 2011 - 11:31am Addthis Mike Gleason (second from left), president and CEO of The Arc of Hilo. Also shown, from left: Annemarie Meike, Mark Sueksdorf, Marjorie Gonzalez and Larry Ferderber | Photo Courtesy of LLNL Mike Gleason (second from left), president and CEO of The Arc of Hilo. Also shown, from left: Annemarie Meike, Mark Sueksdorf, Marjorie Gonzalez and Larry Ferderber | Photo Courtesy of LLNL April Saylor April Saylor Former Digital Outreach Strategist, Office of Public Affairs What are the key facts? LLNL technologies will reduce the plant's electrical bills by 50 percent and provide sustainable and energy efficient solutions for the

169

IGPP-LLNL 1998 annual report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics (IGPP) is a Multicampus Research Unit of the University of California (UC). IGPP was founded in 1946 at UC Los Angeles with a charter to further research in the earth and planetary sciences and related fields. The Institute now has branches at UC campuses in Los Angeles, San Diego, and Riverside, and at Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore national laboratories. The University-wide IGPP has played an important role in establishing interdisciplinary research in the earth and planetary sciences. For example, IGPP was instrumental in founding the fields of physical oceanography and space physics, which at the time fell between the cracks of established university departments. Because of its multicampus orientation, IGPP has sponsored important interinstitutional consortia in the earth and planetary sciences. Each of the five branches has a somewhat different intellectual emphasis as a result of the interplay between strengths of campus departments and Laboratory programs. The IGPP branch at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) was approved by the Regents of the University of California in 1982. IGPP-LLNL emphasizes research in tectonics, geochemistry, and astrophysics. It provides a venue for studying the fundamental aspects of these fields, thereby complementing LLNL programs that pursue applications of these disciplines in national security and energy research. IGPP-LLNL is directed by Charles Alcock and was originally organized into three centers: Geosciences, stressing seismology; High-Pressure Physics, stressing experiments using the two-stage light-gas gun at LLNL; and Astrophysics, stressing theoretical and computational astrophysics. In 1994, the activities of the Center for High-Pressure Physics were merged with those of the Center for Geosciences. The Center for Geosciences, headed by Frederick Ryerson, focuses on research in geophysics and geochemistry. The Astrophysics Research Center, headed by Kem Cook, provides a home for theoretical and observational astrophysics and serves as an interface with the Physics Directorate's astrophysics efforts. The IGPP branch at LLNL (as well as the branch at Los Alamos) also facilitates scientific collaborations between researchers at the UC campuses and those at the national laboratories in areas related to earth science, planetary science, and astrophysics. It does this by sponsoring the University Collaborative Research Program (UCRP), which provides funds to UC campus scientists for joint research projects with LLNL. Additional information regarding IGPP-LLNL projects and people may be found at http://wwwigpp.llnl.gov/. The goals of the UCRP are to enrich research opportunities for UC campus scientists by making available to them some of LLNL's unique facilities and expertise, and to broaden the scientific program at LLNL through collaborative or interdisciplinary work with UC campus researchers. UCRP funds (provided jointly by the Regents of the University of California and by the Director of LLNL) are awarded annually on the basis of brief proposals, which are reviewed by a committee of scientists from UC campuses, LLNL programs, and external universities and research organizations. Typical annual funding for a collaborative research project ranges from $5,000 to $30,000. Funds are used for a variety of purposes, such as salary support for UC graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, and faculty; and costs for experimental facilities. A statistical overview of IGPP-LLNL's UCRP (colloquially known as the mini-grant program) is presented in Figures 1 and 2. Figure 1 shows the distribution of UCRP awards among the UC campuses, by total amount awarded and by number of proposals funded. Figure 2 shows the distribution of awards by center.

Ryerson, F J; Cook, K H; Tweed, J

1999-11-19T23:59:59.000Z

170

Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Lawrence Livermore Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore Laboratory Lawrence Livermore Laboratory October 12, 2011 Agenda Open Plenary Meeting Session 9:30 AM-9:45 AM Welcome and Overview Secretary Steven Chu and Dr. William Perry 9:45 AM-10:00 AM Director's Perspective George Miller, LLNL Director 10:00 AM-10:40 AM LLNL Progress Towards Ignition and Weapons Physics Experiments on NIF Bruce Goodwin and Ed Moses 10:40 AM-11:00 AM LLNL Strategy for Improvements in Cyber Security Jim Brase 11:00 AM-11:20 AM LLNL Computational Advances in Applied Energy Julio Friedman 11:20 AM-12:00 PM DOE in the Innovation Chain Secretary Chu 12:00 PM-1:30 PM Lunch Break 1:30 PM-1:45 PM Subcommittee Updates 1:45 PM-2:30 PM Blue Ribbon Commission Update

171

The Livermore Phantom History and Supplementation  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In vivo monitoring facilities determine the absence or presence of internally entrained radionuclides. To be of greatest utility, the detection systems must detect and quantify the nuclides of interest at levels of interest. Phantoms have been developed to improve measurements at in vivo monitoring facilities. Since the 1970s, the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL, or simply "Livermore") phantom continues to be a well-used tool at lung monitoring facilities, especially for the detection of low-energy emissions from transuranics. The history of its development from need, through design development and current availability, is summarized. The authors have taken the LLNL phantom one step further by scanning the phantom surface and announce the availability of the scan files on the internet.

Snyder, Sandra F.; Traub, Richard J.

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

172

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC, - May 15,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Security LLC, - May Security LLC, - May 15, 2008 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC, - May 15, 2008 May 15, 2008 Enforcement Letter issued to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC related to the Protection of Classified Information at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory In our recent dialogue via televideo with your Deputy, safeguards and security director, and other key managers of your staff, we discussed our reasons for sending this enforcement letter to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC; the purpose of this letter; and our concerns about the protection of classified information at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). Accordingly, this is not a formal enforcement action and imposes no requirements. Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC- May 15, 2008

173

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0-12 0-12 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2000-12 September 27, 2000 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to the University of California related to Authorization Basis Issues at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, (EA-2000-12) This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) investigation of the facts and circumstances concerning Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) maintenance and adherence to documents, which form the Authorization Basis (AB) for the Laboratory's nuclear facilities. Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2000-12 More Documents & Publications Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - November 5, 1999 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - August 22,

174

Spill exercise 1980: an LLNL emergency training exercise  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

An emergency training exercise at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) demonstrated that off-hours emergency personnel can respond promptly and effecively to an emergency situation involving radiation, hazardous chemicals, and injured persons. The exercise simulated an explosion in a chemistry laboratory and a subsequent toxic-gas release.

Morse, J.L.; Gibson, T.A.; Vance, W.F.

1981-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

175

Four Lawrence Livermore researchers named 2013 APS Fellows  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 6 For immediate release: 12/23/2013 | NR-13-12-06 Four Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory scientists have been selected as 2013 fellows of the American Physical Society (APS). They include, from left: Charles Cerjan, Ian Thompson, Eric Schwegler and Marilyn Schneider. Four Lawrence Livermore researchers named 2013 APS Fellows Breanna Bishop, LLNL, (925) 423-9802, bishop33@llnl.gov LIVERMORE, Calif. - Four Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory scientists have been selected as 2013 fellows of the American Physical Society (APS). Physicist Charles Cerjan was cited by the Division of Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics for "seminal contributions to time-dependent Schrodinger equation propagation algorithms and their application to particle scattering and intense field dynamics, the development of laser-produced

176

Cold cases heat up through Lawrence Livermore approach to identifying  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

10-03 10-03 For immediate release: 10/10/2012 | NR-12-10-03 Cold cases heat up through Lawrence Livermore approach to identifying remains Anne M Stark, LLNL, (925) 422-9799, stark8@llnl.gov Printer-friendly Bruce Buchholz loads a sample in the accelerator. High Resolution Image LIVERMORE, Calif. -- In an effort to identify the thousands of John/Jane Doe cold cases in the United States, a Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory researcher and a team of international collaborators have found a multidisciplinary approach to identifying the remains of missing persons. Using "bomb pulse" radiocarbon analysis developed at Lawrence Livermore, combined with recently developed anthropological analysis and forensic DNA techniques, the researchers were able to identify the remains of a missing

177

Site Manager Livermore Site Office  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Year-End Diversity Reports MD-715 DVAAP FEORP 9-Point Plan Special Emphasis Program Training and Education (Program Devel- opment...

178

Environmental Assessment for The Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA (DOE/EA-1442) (12/02)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Assessment for The Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California December 2002 Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Oakland Operations Office EA for the Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at LLNL ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), has responsibility for national programs to reduce and counter threats from weapons of mass destruction including nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons (bioweapons). NNSA's bioscience work at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in support of these missions requires work with infectious agents, including those historically used for bioweapons.

179

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

National Laboratory National Laboratory Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Name Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Address 7000 East Ave. Place Livermore, California Zip 94550-9234 Number of employees 5001-10,000 Year founded 1952 Notes LLNL-WEB-422768 Coordinates 37.6798282°, -121.7107786° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":37.6798282,"lon":-121.7107786,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

180

Researcher, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Bruce Macintosh Bruce Macintosh Researcher, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Bruce Macintosh Bruce Macintosh Role: Researcher, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Award: AAAS Newcomb Cleveland Prize Profile: A Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory researcher's paper published in November 2008 is co-winner of this year's American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Newcomb Cleveland Prize. The Paper is one of two outstanding papers published in Science from June 1, 2008 through May 31, 2009. Bruce Macintosh of the Physics and Life Science Directorate was one of the lead authors of the paper titled, "Direct Imaging of Multiple Planets orbiting the Star HR 8799," which appeared in the Nov. 28, 2008 edition of Science. Christian Marois, a former LLNL postdoc now at NRC Herzberg

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "llnl livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

LLNL Director Search  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

News "Search process for Lawrence Livermore director, LLNS president gets under way," LLNS news release, Nov. 25, 2013. "Parney Albright steps down as Laboratory director, Bret...

182

LLNL Director Search  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Search Committee Search Committee for the selection of a director for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory November 2013 * Additional members are under consideration. Norman...

183

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - November 5,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 5, 1999 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - November 5, 1999 November 5, 1999 Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory related to Authorization Basis Issues This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning issues related to the maintenance and adherence to documents which form the authorization basis for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) operated nuclear facilities. Specifically, three Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) reports were submitted over a four-day period and are summarized below: On July 30, 1999, it was reported that two cabinets contained about [specified amount] of [ ] solvents in violation of the building Safety Analysis Documentation;

184

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - November 5,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 5, 1999 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - November 5, 1999 November 5, 1999 Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory related to Authorization Basis Issues This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning issues related to the maintenance and adherence to documents which form the authorization basis for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) operated nuclear facilities. Specifically, three Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) reports were submitted over a four-day period and are summarized below: On July 30, 1999, it was reported that two cabinets contained about [specified amount] of [ ] solvents in violation of the building Safety Analysis Documentation;

185

Career development for engineers at the LLNL  

SciTech Connect

The career development program for engineers at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) results from a conductive atmosphere rather than a structured program approach. Although the concern for careers first emerged about twenty years ago, in the past decade the Laboratory management has set out to create a favorable climate for its employees to retain their vitality and enhance their creativity. The goal was twofold: to strengthen the Laboratory and to provide more satisfying careers for its employees. How that climate has evolved is the subject of this discussion. What has been done at Livermore may not work at another place. Each organization's make-up, mission, and needs are different, with a unique staff of employees and managers who influence the creation of the organizational climate.

Decker, W.D.

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

186

Modular High Current Test Facility at LLNL  

SciTech Connect

This paper describes the 1 MA, 225 kJ test facility in operation at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). The capacitor bank is constructed from three parallel 1.5 mF modules. The modules are capable of switching simultaneously or sequentially via solid dielectric puncture switches. The bank nominally operates up to 10 kV and reaches peak current with all three cabled modules in approximately 30 {micro}s. Parallel output plates from the bank allow for cable or busbar interfacing to the load. This versatile bank is currently in use for code validation experiments, railgun related activities, switch testing, and diagnostic development.

Tully, L K; Goerz, D A; Speer, R D; Ferriera, T J

2008-05-20T23:59:59.000Z

187

Environmental Protection Department LLNL NESHAPs 2007 Annual Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This annual report is prepared pursuant to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs; Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Part 61, Subpart H). Subpart H governs radionuclide emissions to air from U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) facilities. NESHAPs limits the emission of radionuclides to the ambient air from DOE facilities to levels resulting in an annual effective dose equivalent (EDE) of 10 mrem (100 {micro}Sv) to any member of the public. The EDEs for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) site-wide maximally exposed members of the public from operations in 2007 are summarized here. Livermore site: 0.0031 mrem (0.031 {micro}Sv) (42% from point source emissions, 58% from diffuse source emissions). The point source emissions include gaseous tritium modeled as tritiated water vapor as directed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region IX; the resulting dose is used for compliance purposes. Site 300: 0.0035 mrem (0.035 {micro}Sv) (90% from point source emissions, 10% from diffuse source emissions). The EDEs were calculated using the U.S. EPA-approved CAP88-PC air dispersion/dose-assessment model, except for doses for two diffuse sources that were estimated using measured radionuclide concentrations and dose calculations. Specific inputs to CAP88-PC for the modeled sources included site-specific meteorological data and source emissions data, the latter variously based on continuous stack effluent monitoring data, stack flow or other release-rate information, ambient air monitoring data, and facility knowledge.

Bertoldo, N A; Larson, J M; Wilson, K R

2008-06-25T23:59:59.000Z

188

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-98-01 March 9, 1998 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to University of California related to the Unplanned Personnel Contaminations and Radioactive Material Intakes at the Hazardous Waste Management Facilities at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, (EA-98-01) This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances surrounding the unplanned personnel contaminations/intakes at [a building] of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL) Hazardous Waste Management Facilities on July 2, 1997. Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-98-01 More Documents & Publications Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -

189

Independent Oversight Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March 2001 Independent Oversight Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March 2001 March 2001 Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Health Services Department The Office of Environment, Safety, and Health (ES&H) Oversight (EH-2) in conjunction with the Accreditation Association of Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC) reviewed the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Health Services Department on March 19-21, 2001. The purpose of the review was twofold. First, EH-2 performed a review of selected activities to identify positive attributes, issues, and opportunities for improvement. Second, the AAAHC surveyed the medical program for accreditation. This report documents

190

LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY OVERVIEW OF LLNL LICENSE ...  

one or more fields of use. ... c. Security and energy conservation; d. ... Number of Licenses Total Cost for All Licenses 1 $100,000

191

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL): Around the Lab...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

222013) 'Fun with Science' as seen on TV (3212013) Lab scientists contributed to Higgs Boson results (3212013) March 2013 issue of Science & Technology Review (3112013)...

192

Smashing science: Livermore scientists discover how explosives respond to  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 3 For immediate release: 12/12/2013 | NR-13-12-03 High Resolution Image A schematic representation of the shock experiment. The resulting energy release pushed the shock front to the left. Image by Liam Krauss/LLNL. Smashing science: Livermore scientists discover how explosives respond to shockwaves Anne M Stark, LLNL, (925) 422-9799, stark8@llnl.gov Watch Video A laser pulse impinging on an aluminum ablation layer (which is coated on a glass substrate to the right), which generates a rapidly expanding plasma. This small explosion pushes the ablator to the left and drives a shock wave in the sample. The experiment simultaneously measures the speed of the shock wave in the sample, and the speed of the ablator expansion, which allows Livermore researchers to estimate the pressure and density of the

193

Livermore team successfully leads important test of a conventional warhead  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

102813_dod 102813_dod 10/28/2013 Livermore team successfully leads important test of a conventional warhead for the DoD Anne M Stark, LLNL, (925) 422-9799, stark8@llnl.gov LLNL served as technical lead and integrator on an important test to assess a new conventional warhead designed by the Lab. Dave Hare, Livermore's program manager of the test, called it an "unequivocal success." Below is the press release from the Department of Defense Defense Department successfully conducts warhead sled test The Defense Department announced recently the successful testing of an advanced conventional precision effects warhead, a critical part of a national effort to establish a conventional prompt strike capability. This capability will contribute to the country's ability to defend its interests

194

Evaluation of LLNL's Nuclear Accident Dosimeters at the CALIBAN Reactor September 2010  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory uses neutron activation elements in a Panasonic TLD holder as a personnel nuclear accident dosimeter (PNAD). The LLNL PNAD has periodically been tested using a Cf-252 neutron source, however until 2009, it was more than 25 years since the PNAD has been tested against a source of neutrons that arise from a reactor generated neutron spectrum that simulates a criticality. In October 2009, LLNL participated in an intercomparison of nuclear accident dosimeters at the CEA Valduc Silene reactor (Hickman, et.al. 2010). In September 2010, LLNL participated in a second intercomparison of nuclear accident dosimeters at CEA Valduc. The reactor generated neutron irradiations for the 2010 exercise were performed at the Caliban reactor. The Caliban results are described in this report. The procedure for measuring the nuclear accident dosimeters in the event of an accident has a solid foundation based on many experimental results and comparisons. The entire process, from receiving the activated NADs to collecting and storing them after counting was executed successfully in a field based operation. Under normal conditions at LLNL, detectors are ready and available 24/7 to perform the necessary measurement of nuclear accident components. Likewise LLNL maintains processing laboratories that are separated from the areas where measurements occur, but contained within the same facility for easy movement from processing area to measurement area. In the event of a loss of LLNL permanent facilities, the Caliban and previous Silene exercises have demonstrated that LLNL can establish field operations that will very good nuclear accident dosimetry results. There are still several aspects of LLNL's nuclear accident dosimetry program that have not been tested or confirmed. For instance, LLNL's method for using of biological samples (blood and hair) has not been verified since the method was first developed in the 1980's. Because LLNL and the other DOE participants were limited in what they were allowed to do at the Caliban and Silene exercises and testing of various elements of the nuclear accident dosimetry programs cannot always be performed as guests at other sites, it has become evident that DOE needs its own capability to test nuclear accident dosimeters. Angular dependence determination and correction factors for NADs desperately need testing as well as more evaluation regarding the correct determination of gamma doses. It will be critical to properly design any testing facility so that the necessary experiments can be performed by DOE laboratories as well as guest laboratories. Alternate methods of dose assessment such as using various metals commonly found in pockets and clothing have yet to be evaluated. The DOE is planning to utilize the Godiva or Flattop reactor for testing nuclear accident dosimeters. LLNL has been assigned the primary operational authority for such testing. Proper testing of nuclear accident dosimeters will require highly specific characterization of the pulse fields. Just as important as the characterization of the pulsed fields will be the design of facilities used to process the NADs. Appropriate facilities will be needed to allow for early access to dosimeters to test and develop quick sorting techniques. These facilities will need appropriate laboratory preparation space and an area for measurements. Finally, such a facility will allow greater numbers of LLNL and DOE laboratory personnel to train on the processing and interpretation of nuclear accident dosimeters and results. Until this facility is fully operational for test purposes, DOE laboratories may need to continue periodic testing as guests of other reactor facilities such as Silene and Caliban.

Hickman, D P; Wysong, A R; Heinrichs, D P; Wong, C T; Merritt, M J; Topper, J D; Gressmann, F A; Madden, D J

2011-06-21T23:59:59.000Z

195

LLNL 2011 EStar Awards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Webinar M 8 2012 May 8, 2012 Heather Ottaway, Jennifer Doman Pollution PreventionSustainability (P2S) Program Pollution PreventionSustainability (P2S) Program LLNL-PRES-554271...

196

LLNL Director Search  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Search Process As agreed among the LLNS partners, the University of California is responsible for leading the search for the next LLNL Director. UC-appointed Chairman of the LLNS...

197

LLNL 10(a)(1)(A) Annual Report (TE-053672-2)--2005  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes research related to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL) Experimental Test Site, Site 300 (S300), located within Alameda and San Joaquin Counties (Figure 1) and conducted under the 10(a)(1)(A) (Recovery) permit TE-053672-2. This property is held in ownership by the U.S. Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). The 2005 Recovery research at S300 involved fieldwork associated with only two species: Alameda whipsnake (Masticophis lateralis euryxanthus) and the California red-legged frog (Rana aurora draytonii) (RLF). Note: the whipsnake subspecies existing at S300 shows taxonomic variation (generally 50% chaparral whipsnake [Masticophis lateralis] traits) when compared to the Alameda whipsnake (Riemer 1954) and therefore it will be referred to as ''California whipsnake (Masticophis lateralis)'' (CWS) for classification purposes in this report (Swaim 2004).

Woollett, J

2006-01-26T23:59:59.000Z

198

Microsoft Word - LLNL 2011 SA_8_1.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Nuclear Security Administration National Nuclear Security Administration Livermore Site Office Livermore, California SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS of the 2005 Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement For Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Volume I: Main Report AUGUST 2011 DOE/EIS-0348-SA-03 i CONTENTS NOTATION.............................................................................................................................. v SUMMARY...........................................................................................................................S-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose and Need............................................................................................

199

Microsoft Word - LLNL 2011 CRD_8_1.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Nuclear Security Administration National Nuclear Security Administration Livermore Site Office Livermore, California SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS of the 2005 Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement For Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory VOLUME II: Comment Response Document AUGUST 2011 DOE/EIS-0348-SA-03 ii (This page intentionally left blank.) iii Contents NOTATIONS..................................................................................................................... iv Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................ iv Units of Measure............................................................................................................ vi 1.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................

200

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Livermore Field  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Livermore Livermore Field Office Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Livermore Field Office The purpose of the Livermore Field Office (LFO) Teclmical Qualification Program (TQP) is to ensure that federal teclmical personnel with safety oversight responsibilities at defense nuclear facilities at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory possess competence commensurate with responsibilities. LFO is committed to ensuring it has the necessary teclmical capabilities to provide the kind of management, direction, and guidance essential to safe operation ofDOE's defense nuclear facilities. LFO TQP Self-Assessment, May 2013 More Documents & Publications Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Nevada Site Office Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Sandia Site Office

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "llnl livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 September 2013 Review of the Fire Protection Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of the fire protection program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The review was performed June 10-21, 2013, by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, which is within the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security. The review was one part of a targeted assessment of fire protection at nuclear facilities across the DOE complex, including National Nuclear Security Administration sites. The purpose of the Independent Oversight targeted assessment was to

202

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 September 2013 Review of the Fire Protection Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of the fire protection program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The review was performed June 10-21, 2013, by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, which is within the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security. The review was one part of a targeted assessment of fire protection at nuclear facilities across the DOE complex, including National Nuclear Security Administration sites. The purpose of the Independent Oversight targeted assessment was to

203

LLNL 1981: technical horizons  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Research programs at LLNL for 1981 are described in broad terms. In his annual State of the Laboratory address, Director Roger Batzel projected a $481 million operating budget for fiscal year 1982, up nearly 13% from last year. In projects for the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense, the Laboratory applies its technical facilities and capabilities to nuclear weapons design and development and other areas of defense research that include inertial confinement fusion, nonnuclear ordnances, and particle-beam technology. LLNL is also applying its unique experience and capabilities to a variety of projects that will help the nation meet its energy needs in an environmentally acceptable manner. A sampling of recent achievements by LLNL support organizations indicates their diversity. (GHT)

Not Available

1981-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

204

Recent Changes to the Criticality Safety Program at LLNL  

SciTech Connect

During the 1996 audit, a corrective action program was developed and implemented to enhance the Criticality Safety Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The Criticality Safety Program at LLNL has been rebuilt to combine a strong core criticality safety program with direct field support to floor operations. Field staff are integrated into the supported facility and program efforts. This method of operation effects all aspects of the criticality safety program including, as examples, development of criticality safety controls and training.

Pearson, J.S.; Burch, J.G.; Huang, S.T.

2001-08-22T23:59:59.000Z

205

LLNL, LANL, Sandia directors visit Russian laboratories  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

LLNL Go Home > News > News Center > Around the Lab > 073012russian 07272012 LLNL, LANL, Sandia directors visit Russian laboratories Lauren Y Devore, LLNL, (925) 422-0855,...

206

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Livermore researchers have pioneered the formulation and application of silica aerogels, an extremely lightweight glassy material with ideal mechanical characteristics for...

207

LLNL Scientist Named NNSA Science and Technology Excellence Award Winner |  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

NNSA Blog > LLNL Scientist Named NNSA Science and Technology ... NNSA Blog > LLNL Scientist Named NNSA Science and Technology ... LLNL Scientist Named NNSA Science and Technology Excellence Award Winner Posted By Office of Public Affairs NNSA Administrator Thomas D'Agostino yesterday awarded the first ever NNSA Science and Technology Excellence Award to Dr. Michel McCoy from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for his groundbreaking computer science research and leadership with the Advanced Simulation and Computing program. The newly-established NNSA Science and Technology Excellence Award is the highest level of recognition for science and technology achievement in NNSA. It recognizes accomplishment that can include vision, leadership, innovation and intellectual contributions. The award is intended to draw attention to the remarkable scientific and technological successes that are

208

Supplement analysis for continued operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore. Volume 2: Comment response document  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy (DOE), prepared a draft Supplement Analysis (SA) for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore (SNL-L), in accordance with DOE`s requirements for implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (10 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Part 1021.314). It considers whether the Final Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore (1992 EIS/EIR) should be supplement3ed, whether a new environmental impact statement (EIS) should be prepared, or no further NEPA documentation is required. The SA examines the current project and program plans and proposals for LLNL and SNL-L, operations to identify new or modified projects or operations or new information for the period from 1998 to 2002 that was not considered in the 1992 EIS/EIR. When such changes, modifications, and information are identified, they are examined to determine whether they could be considered substantial or significant in reference to the 1992 proposed action and the 1993 Record of Decision (ROD). DOE released the draft SA to the public to obtain stakeholder comments and to consider those comments in the preparation of the final SA. DOE distributed copies of the draft SA to those who were known to have an interest in LLNL or SNL-L activities in addition to those who requested a copy. In response to comments received, DOE prepared this Comment Response Document.

NONE

1999-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

209

Patents - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

LLNL Home. Latest News Headlines. LLNL, Intel, Cray produce big data machine. November 4, 2013. ... for the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security ...

210

Technologies - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

LLNL Home. Latest News Headlines. LLNL, Intel, Cray produce big data machine. November 4, 2013. First results from most sensitive dark matter detector. October 31, 2013.

211

Lawrence Livermore: News and Public Affairs: News and Media: NR-04-02-01  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Social Media Logos Follow LLNL on YouTube Subscribe to LLNL's RSS feed Follow LLNL on Facebook Follow LLNL on Twitter Follow LLNL on Flickr Social Media Logos Follow LLNL on YouTube Subscribe to LLNL's RSS feed Follow LLNL on Facebook Follow LLNL on Twitter Follow LLNL on Flickr Contact: Anne M. Stark Phone:(925) 422-9799 E-mail: stark8@llnl.gov FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Date: February 2, 2004 NR-04-02-01 Livermore Scientists Team With Russia To Discover Elements 113 and 115 A calcium-48 ion is accelerated to a high velocity in a cyclotron and directed at an americium-243 target. (300 dpi) One of the numerous americium-243 target atoms with a nucleus of protons and neutrons surrounded by an electron cloud. (300 dpi) An accelerated calcium-48 ion and an americium-243 target atom just before they collide. (300 dpi) The moment of collision between an accelerated calcium-48 ion and an americium-243 target atom.

212

Final closure plan for the high-explosives open burn treatment facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Experimental Test Site 300  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document addresses the interim status closure of the HE Open Bum Treatment Facility, as detailed by Title 22, Division 4.5, Chapter 15, Article 7 of the Califonia Code of Regulations (CCR) and by Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 265, Subpart G, ``Closure and Post Closure.`` The Closure Plan (Chapter 1) and the Post- Closure Plan (Chapter 2) address the concept of long-term hazard elimination. The Closure Plan provides for capping and grading the HE Open Bum Treatment Facility and revegetating the immediate area in accordance with applicable requirements. The Closure Plan also reflects careful consideration of site location and topography, geologic and hydrologic factors, climate, cover characteristics, type and amount of wastes, and the potential for contaminant migration. The Post-Closure Plan is designed to allow LLNL to monitor the movement, if any, of pollutants from the treatment area. In addition, quarterly inspections will ensure that all surfaces of the closed facility, including the cover and diversion ditches, remain in good repair, thus precluding the potential for contaminant migration.

Mathews, S.

1997-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

213

Lawrence Livermore and Cool Earth Solar receive $1.7 million for renewable  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 3 For immediate release: 05/14/2013 | NR-13-05-03 Lawrence Livermore and Cool Earth Solar receive $1.7 million for renewable energy demonstration project Anne M Stark, LLNL, (925) 422-9799, stark8@llnl.gov Printer-friendly The concentrator photovoltaic (CPV) system in the field. Photo courtesy of Cool Earth Inc. High Resolution Image The California Energy Commission (CEC) has awarded $1.7 million to a partnership between Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Cool Earth Solar Inc. (CES) to conduct a community-scale renewable energy integration demonstration project at the Livermore Valley Open Campus. CES is the prime awardee and is contributing an additional $1 million in matching funds to the CEC amount, while LLNL will provide advanced R&D support for the effort.

214

Print - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Industrial Partnerships Office P.O. Box 808, L-795 Livermore, CA 94551 Phone: (925) 422-6416 Fax: (925) 423-8988 Operated by Lawrence Livermore ...

215

LVOC - Livermore Valley Open Campus  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Livermore Livermore National Laboratory researchers used meteorological observations and wind farm data in conjunction with high-performance computing to help industry partners...

216

Search - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Industrial Partnerships Office P.O. Box 808, L-795 Livermore, CA 94551 Phone: (925) 422-6416 Fax: (925) 423-8988 Operated by Lawrence Livermore ...

217

Alan Alda awards Lawrence Livermore engineer for making science  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 For immediate release: 06/04/2013 | NR-13-06-01 From left: Steve Maguire, who won in the video category of the 2013 Flame Challenge, Alan Alda and Nick Williams, who won in the written category. Alan Alda awards Lawrence Livermore engineer for making science understandable Linda A Lucchetti, LLNL, (925) 422-5815, lucchetti1@llnl.gov Students from Candlewood Middle School in Dix Hills N.Y. join Alan Alda in presenting the Flame Challege Award to Nick Williams at the World Science Festival. What is time? How would you explain it to a 5th grader? Nick Williams, a retired engineer and science presenter from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory not only has done a fine job of conveying the concept of time to 11 year olds, he's being recognized for it. Williams

218

Laser fusion experiment yields record energy at Lawrence Livermore's  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4 4 For immediate release: 08/26/2013 | NR-13-08-04 High Resolution Image All NIF experiments are controlled and orchestrated by the integrated computer control system in the facility's control room. It consists of 950 front-end processors attached to about 60,000 control points, including mirrors, lenses, motors, sensors, cameras, amplifiers, capacitors and diagnostic instruments. Laser fusion experiment yields record energy at Lawrence Livermore's National Ignition Facility Breanna Bishop, LLNL, (925) 423-9802, bishop33@llnl.gov High Resolution Image The preamplifiers of the National Ignition Facility are the first step in increasing the energy of laser beams as they make their way toward the target chamber. LIVERMORE, Calif. -- In the early morning hours of Aug.13, Lawrence

219

LLNL-ABS-499158  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

158 158 Page 1 Session 10, Computational Physics-Computer Science and Methods Model of Turbulent Combustion of Al Particle Clouds in Explosions A. L. Kuhl * , J. B. Bell † , V. E. Beckner † and K. Balakrishnan † * Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA USA † Lawrence Berkeley Natonal Laboratory, Berkeley, CA USA We consider the problem of combustion in Shock-Dispersed-Fuel (SDF) explosions [1, 2]. The SDF charge consists of a spherical PETN booster (1/3 the mass), surrounded by flake Aluminum powder (2/3 the mass) with a bulk density of 0.6 g/cc. Detonation of the booster charge creates a blast wave that disperses the Al powder and ignites the ensuing Al-air mixture-thereby forming a two-phase combustion cloud embedded in the explosion. We model this process with a two-

220

LLNL Capabilities in Underground Coal Gasification  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Underground coal gasification (UCG) has received renewed interest as a potential technology for producing hydrogen at a competitive price particularly in Europe and China. The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) played a leading role in this field and continues to do so. It conducted UCG field tests in the nineteen-seventies and -eighties resulting in a number of publications culminating in a UCG model published in 1989. LLNL successfully employed the ''Controlled Retraction Injection Point'' (CRIP) method in some of the Rocky Mountain field tests near Hanna, Wyoming. This method, shown schematically in Fig.1, uses a horizontally-drilled lined injection well where the lining can be penetrated at different locations for injection of the O{sub 2}/steam mixture. The cavity in the coal seam therefore gets longer as the injection point is retracted as well as wider due to reaction of the coal wall with the hot gases. Rubble generated from the collapsing wall is an important mechanism studied by Britten and Thorsness.

Friedmann, S J; Burton, E; Upadhye, R

2006-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "llnl livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

team are using Livermore's 6.2-meter-long, two-stage, light-gas gun to conduct their shock experiments on organic liquids. They are focusing initially on cometary impacts. For...

222

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Emergency Response Capability Baseline Needs Assessment Requirement Document  

SciTech Connect

This revision of the LLNL Fire Protection Baseline Needs Assessment (BNA) was prepared by John A. Sharry, LLNL Fire Marshal and LLNL Division Leader for Fire Protection and reviewed by Martin Gresho, Sandia/CA Fire Marshal. The document follows and expands upon the format and contents of the DOE Model Fire Protection Baseline Capabilities Assessment document contained on the DOE Fire Protection Web Site, but only address emergency response. The original LLNL BNA was created on April 23, 1997 as a means of collecting all requirements concerning emergency response capabilities at LLNL (including response to emergencies at Sandia/CA) into one BNA document. The original BNA documented the basis for emergency response, emergency personnel staffing, and emergency response equipment over the years. The BNA has been updated and reissued five times since in 1998, 1999, 2000, 2002, and 2004. A significant format change was performed in the 2004 update of the BNA in that it was 'zero based.' Starting with the requirement documents, the 2004 BNA evaluated the requirements, and determined minimum needs without regard to previous evaluations. This 2010 update maintains the same basic format and requirements as the 2004 BNA. In this 2010 BNA, as in the previous BNA, the document has been intentionally divided into two separate documents - the needs assessment (1) and the compliance assessment (2). The needs assessment will be referred to as the BNA and the compliance assessment will be referred to as the BNA Compliance Assessment. The primary driver for separation is that the needs assessment identifies the detailed applicable regulations (primarily NFPA Standards) for emergency response capabilities based on the hazards present at LLNL and Sandia/CA and the geographical location of the facilities. The needs assessment also identifies areas where the modification of the requirements in the applicable NFPA standards is appropriate, due to the improved fire protection provided, the remote location and low population density of some the facilities. As such, the needs assessment contains equivalencies to the applicable requirements. The compliance assessment contains no such equivalencies and simply assesses the existing emergency response resources to the requirements of the BNA and can be updated as compliance changes independent of the BNA update schedule. There are numerous NFPA codes and standards and other requirements and guidance documents that address the subject of emergency response. These requirements documents are not always well coordinated and may contain duplicative or conflicting requirements or even coverage gaps. Left unaddressed, this regulatory situation results in frequent interpretation of requirements documents. Different interpretations can then lead to inconsistent implementation. This BNA addresses this situation by compiling applicable requirements from all identified sources (see Section 5) and analyzing them collectively to address conflict and overlap as applicable to the hazards presented by the LLNL and Sandia/CA sites (see Section 7). The BNA also generates requirements when needed to fill any identified gaps in regulatory coverage. Finally, the BNA produces a customized simple set of requirements, appropriate for the DOE protection goals, such as those defined in DOE O 420.1B, the hazard level, the population density, the topography, and the site layout at LLNL and Sandia/CA that will be used as the baseline requirements set - the 'baseline needs' - for emergency response at LLNL and Sandia/CA. A template approach is utilized to accomplish this evaluation for each of the nine topical areas that comprise the baseline needs for emergency response. The basis for conclusions reached in determining the baseline needs for each of the topical areas is presented in Sections 7.1 through 7.9. This BNA identifies only mandatory requirements and establishes the minimum performance criteria. The minimum performance criteria may not be the level of performance desired Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory or Sandia/CA

Sharry, J A

2009-12-30T23:59:59.000Z

223

EIS-0348: Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

: Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement : Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0348: Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplement Stockpile Stewardship and Management The continued operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) is critical to National Nuclear Security Administration's Stockpile Stewardship Program and to preventing the spread and use of nuclear weapons worldwide. LLNL maintains core competencies in activities associated with research, development, design, and surveillance of nuclear weapons, as well as the assessment and certification of their safety and reliability. In response to the end of the Cold War and changes in the world's political regimes, the emphasis on the U.S. nuclear weapons program has shifted from

224

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-98-06 July 28, 1998 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to the University of California related to Criticality Safety and the Quality Assurance Program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, July 28, 1998 (EA-98-06) This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances surrounding a series of criticality safety infractions occurring between May and December 1997 in [a building] at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). [The building] is the central repository used to process and store [radioactive material]. During the period May 20 through July 15, 1997, Certified [Radioactive Material] Handlers violated criticality safety procedures for mass limits and form

225

Energy Densities for LLNL EMB  

Summary of Projected Power and Energy Density Parameters for the New Generation LLNL Electromechanical Batteries R.F. Post June 24, 2013

226

Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Summary-1992.html[6/24/2011 3:44:58 PM] Summary-1992.html[6/24/2011 3:44:58 PM] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the Regents of the University of California (UC) propose the continued operation, including near-term (within 5 to 10 years) proposed projects, of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). In addition, DOE proposes the continued operation, including near-term proposed projects, of Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore (SNL, Livermore). Continued operation plus proposed projects at the two Laboratories is needed so that the research and development missions established by Congress and the President can continue to be supported. As provided and encouraged by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), DOE and UC have prepared this document as a joint Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and

227

Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-1992/01eis0157_a.html[6/27/2011 9:53:34 AM] 2-1992/01eis0157_a.html[6/27/2011 9:53:34 AM] APPENDIX A DESCRIPTION OF MAJOR PROGRAMS AND FACILITIES Appendix A describes the programs, infrastructures, facilities, and future plans of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and the Sandia National Laboratories at Livermore (SNL, Livermore). It provides information on existing activities and facilities, as well as information on those activities anticipated to occur or facilities to be constructed over the next 5 to 10 years. The purpose of this appendix is to: present information that can be used to evaluate the proposed action and other EIS/EIR alternatives, identify activities that are part of the proposed action, distinguish proposed action activities from no action alternative activities, and

228

Print - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

... building, geology, etc.) to be ... LLNL is seeking potential commercial partners that ... Custom electronics have been implemented to control the ...

229

LLNL-PRES-463228 FUSION PERSPECTIVES*  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

LLNL-PRES-463228 FUSION PERSPECTIVES* LLNL Fusion Energy Sciences Program D.D. Ryutov Fusion, Novosibirsk, July 1988: working together with the LLNL team #12;Axisymmetric mirrors can serve as a basis

230

Evaluation of Cavity Collapse and Surface Crater Formation for Selected Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Tests - 2011  

SciTech Connect

This report evaluates collapse evolution for selected Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) underground nuclear tests at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS, formerly called the Nevada Test Site). The work is being done at the request of National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec) and supports the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration for the Nevada Site Office Borehole Management Program (BMP). The primary objective of this program is to close (plug) weapons program legacy boreholes that are deemed no longer useful. Safety decisions must be made before a crater area, or potential crater area, can be reentered for any work. Our statements on cavity collapse and crater formation are input into their safety decisions. The BMP is an on-going program to address hundreds of boreholes at the NTS. Each year NSTec establishes a list of holes to be addressed. They request the assistance of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Los Alamos National Laboratory Containment Programs to provide information related to the evolution of collapse history and make statements on completeness of collapse as relates to surface crater stability. These statements do not include the effects of erosion that may modify the collapse craters over time. They also do not address possible radiation dangers that may be present. Subject matter experts from the LLNL Containment Program who had been active in weapons testing activities performed these evaluations. Information used included drilling and hole construction, emplacement and stemming, timing and sequence of the selected test and nearby tests, geology, yield, depth of burial, collapse times, surface crater sizes, cavity and crater volume estimations, ground motion, and radiological release information. Both classified and unclassified data were reviewed. Various amounts of information are available for these tests, depending on their age and other associated activities. Lack of data can hamper evaluations and introduce uncertainty. We make no attempt to quantify this uncertainty. The following unclassified summary statements describe collapse evolution and crater stability in response to a recent request to review 3 LLNL test locations in areas 2 and 12: Kennebec in U2af, Cumberland in U2e, and Yuba in U12b.10.

Pawloski, G A

2011-02-28T23:59:59.000Z

231

Aerosol Modeling at LLNL - Our capability, results, and perspective  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Aerosol Indirect Effects to Cloud Aerosol Indirect Effects to Cloud Parameterizations in Short-Range Weather Forecasts with CAM3 Over the Southern Great Plains during May 2003 IOP Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344 Catherine Chuang, James Boyle Shaocheng Xie and James Kelly LLNL-POST-401948 March 11, 2008 Why are aerosol/cloud interactions important? The greatest uncertainty in the assessment of radiative forcing arises from the interactions of aerosols with clouds. Radiative forcing of climate between 1750 and 2005 (IPCC, 2007) Sources of uncertainty Emissions Gas to particle conversion Aerosol size distribution Linkage between aerosols

232

LLNL-ABS-499831  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

831 831 Page 1 Session 1b: Techniques for Dynamic Experiments New Regimes for Supernova-Relevant Laboratory Astrophysics Experiments at the National Ignition Facility A.R. Miles*, H.-S. Park, B.A. Remington, W. Hsing, C.J. Keane, D.H. Kalantar, B. Maddox, B. Young, R.J. Wallace Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory F.W. Doss, R.P. Drake, M.J. Grosskopf, E.C. Harding, C.M. Huntington, C.M. Krauland, C.C. Kuranz, D.C. Marion, E. Myra University of Michigan J.D. Kilkenny, E. Giraldez, General Atomics; N. Hearn University of Chicago; T. Plewa Florida State University; J.C. Wheeler, University of Texas; W.D. Arnett, University of Arizona The National Ignition Facility (NIF) offers far more energy than has previously been available for experiments on high-energy-density (HED) laser platforms. An effort is currently underway to extend

233

Print - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Industrial Partnerships Office P.O. Box 808, L-795 Livermore, CA 94551 Phone: (925) 422-6416 Fax: (925) 423-8988 Operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC ...

234

Technologies - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Industrial Partnerships Office P.O. Box 808, L-795 Livermore, CA 94551 Phone: (925) 422-6416 Fax: (925) 423-8988 Operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC ...

235

Search - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Industrial Partnerships Office P.O. Box 808, L-795 Livermore, CA 94551 Phone: (925) 422-6416 Fax: (925) 423-8988 Operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC ...

236

GAO-04-986R Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: Further Improvements Needed to Strengthen Controls Over the Purchase Card Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6R LLNL Purchase Card Controls 6R LLNL Purchase Card Controls United States Government Accountability Office Washington, DC 20548 August 6, 2004 Congressional Requesters Subject: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: Further Improvements Needed to Strengthen Controls Over the Purchase Card Program The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) located in Livermore, California is a government-owned, contractor-operated national laboratory of the Department of Energy's (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). 1 The University of California manages the lab under a cost-reimbursable contract with NNSA. The university is paid a management fee to operate the lab and is reimbursed for all allowable costs charged to the contract. During the fall of 2002, the Federal Bureau of Investigation began investigating two

237

Lawrence Livermore wins six R&D Awards for science, technological  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6-08 6-08 For immediate release: 06/20/2012 | NR-12-06-08 Lawrence Livermore wins six R&D Awards for science, technological innovation Lynda L Seaver, LLNL, (925) 423-3103, seaver1@llnl.gov Printer-friendly Natalia Zaitseva, an LLNL materials scientist, leads a team of Livermore researchers that has developed the first plastic material capable of efficiently distinguishing neutrons from gamma rays, something not thought possible for the past five decades or so. See video. Photo by Jacqueline McBride High Resolution Image The vertical cross-section of the "snowflake" region of an experimental tokamak TCV in Switzerland. The left panel shows broad spreading of the exhaust plasma, and the right shows the snowflake-shaped magnetic field lines (six branches, counting the two directed upward) near the magnetic

238

Excess Property LLNL.PDF  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-01 2-01 I N S P E C T I O N R E P O R T U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE OF INSPECTIONS INSPECTION ON THE MANAGEMENT OF EXCESS PERSONAL PROPERTY AT LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY NOVEMBER 2001 November 8, 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, OAKLAND OPERATIONS OFFICE FROM: Sandra L. Schneider /s/ Assistant Inspector General for Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Report of "Inspection on the Management of Excess Personal Property at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory" BACKGROUND Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore) has a personal property inventory of over 53,500 line items with an acquisition value of over $823 million. It generates thousands of excess personal property items each year. In FY 2000, for example, Livermore excessed over

239

Technologies - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Nuclear & Radiological. ... Operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration

240

Application - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Search & Browse Software: Licensing Instructions: Patents: Application. Industrial Partnerships Office P.O. Box 808, L-795 Livermore, CA 94551 ...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "llnl livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

6th US-Russian Pu Science Workshop Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

US-Russian Pu Science Workshop US-Russian Pu Science Workshop Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory University of California, Livermore, California July 14 and 15, 2006 Local Chairs: Michael Fluss, James Tobin, Adam Schwartz LLNL, Livermore, USA Alexander V. Petrovtsev, RFNC * VNIITF, Snezhinsk, Russia Boris A. Nadykto, RFNC * VNIIEF, Sarov, Russia Lidia F. Timofeeva, VNIINM, Moscow, Russia Siegfried S. Hecker, (Luis Morales POC) LANL, Los Alamos, USA Valentin E. Arkhipov, IMP, Ural Branch of RAS, Yekaterinburg, Russia This is a satellite meeting of the "Pu Futures-The Science 2006 International Conference", 9-13 July 2006, Asilomar Conference, Grounds, Pacific Grove Ca. The workshop is hosted by LLNL, under the aegis of the United States/Russian Federation Scientific and Technical Collaboration pursuant

242

Lawrence Livermore, Intel, Cray produce big data machine to serve as  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 For immediate release: 11/04/2013 | NR-13-11-01 High Resolution Image Catalyst is a unique high performance computing (HPC) cluster that will serve research scientists and provide a proving ground for new HPC and Big Data technologies and architectures. It was recently installed at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Lawrence Livermore, Intel, Cray produce big data machine to serve as catalyst for next-generation HPC clusters Donald B Johnston, LLNL, (925) 423-4902, johnston19@llnl.gov Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in partnership with Intel and Cray, today announced a unique high performance computing (HPC) cluster that will serve research scientists at all three institutions and provide a proving ground for new HPC and Big Data technologies and architectures.

243

Lab Spotlight: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Designing Biocompatible Microelectronics Pioneering work with polymer-based microfabrication methods at Lawrence Livermore National...

244

Evaluation of Cavity Collapse and Surface Crater Formation for Selected Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Underground Nuclear Tests - 2010  

SciTech Connect

This report evaluates collapse evolution for selected Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) underground nuclear tests at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS, formerly called the Nevada Test Site). The work is being done at the request of Navarro-Interra LLC, and supports environmental restoration efforts by the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration for the Nevada Site Office. Safety decisions must be made before a surface crater area, or potential surface crater area, can be reentered for any work. Our statements on cavity collapse and surface crater formation are input into their safety decisions. These statements do not include the effects of erosion that may modify the surface collapse craters over time. They also do not address possible radiation dangers that may be present. Subject matter experts from the LLNL Containment Program who had been active in weapons testing activities performed these evaluations. Information used included drilling and hole construction, emplacement and stemming, timing and sequence of the selected test and nearby tests, geology, yield, depth of burial, collapse times, surface crater sizes, cavity and crater volume estimations, and ground motion. Both classified and unclassified data were reviewed. Various amounts of information are available for these tests, depending on their age and other associated activities. Lack of data can hamper evaluations and introduce uncertainty. We make no attempt to quantify this uncertainty.

Pawloski, G A

2011-01-03T23:59:59.000Z

245

Fixed Monthly Living Expense Payments at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, INS-L-11-05  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fixed Monthly Living Expense Fixed Monthly Living Expense Payments at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory INS-L-11-05 September 2011 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 21, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR MANAGER, LIVERMORE SITE OFFICE FROM: Sandra D. Bruce Assistant Inspector General for Inspections SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Inspection Report on "Fixed Monthly Living Expense Payments at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory" BACKGROUND The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore) is a Department of Energy (Department) laboratory managed and operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the Department's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). Livermore's mission is to ensure the safety and security of the nation through applied science and technology in key

246

RECOVERY ACT LEADS TO CLEANUP OF TRANSURANIC WASTE SITES | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

RECOVERY ACT LEADS TO CLEANUP OF TRANSURANIC WASTE SITES RECOVERY ACT LEADS TO CLEANUP OF TRANSURANIC WASTE SITES RECOVERY ACT LEADS TO CLEANUP OF TRANSURANIC WASTE SITES October 1, 2010 - 12:00pm Addthis RECOVERY ACT LEADS TO CLEANUP OF TRANSURANIC WASTE SITES Carlsbad, NM - The recent completion of transuranic (TRU) waste cleanup at Vallecitos Nuclear Center (VNC) and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Site 300 in California brings the total number of sites cleared of TRU waste to 17. "Recovery Act funding has made this possible," Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) Recovery Act Federal Project Director Casey Gadbury said of the VNC and LLNL cleanups funded with about $1.6 million in Recovery Act funds. "The cleanup of these and other small-quantity sites has been and will be accelerated because of the available Recovery Act funds."

247

RECOVERY ACT LEADS TO CLEANUP OF TRANSURANIC WASTE SITES | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

RECOVERY ACT LEADS TO CLEANUP OF TRANSURANIC WASTE SITES RECOVERY ACT LEADS TO CLEANUP OF TRANSURANIC WASTE SITES RECOVERY ACT LEADS TO CLEANUP OF TRANSURANIC WASTE SITES October 1, 2010 - 12:00pm Addthis RECOVERY ACT LEADS TO CLEANUP OF TRANSURANIC WASTE SITES Carlsbad, NM - The recent completion of transuranic (TRU) waste cleanup at Vallecitos Nuclear Center (VNC) and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Site 300 in California brings the total number of sites cleared of TRU waste to 17. "Recovery Act funding has made this possible," Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) Recovery Act Federal Project Director Casey Gadbury said of the VNC and LLNL cleanups funded with about $1.6 million in Recovery Act funds. "The cleanup of these and other small-quantity sites has been and will be accelerated because of the available Recovery Act funds."

248

Print - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

... (LLNL). In the late eighties he started and led the Industrial Partnering program while he was Associate Director for Engineering. In 1995, ...

249

Search - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Giving animals in need a HOME. November 14, 2013. LLNL, Intel, Cray produce big data machine. ... for the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration

250

Technologies - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Giving animals in need a HOME. November 14, 2013. LLNL, Intel, Cray produce big data machine. ... for the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration

251

Print - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

... we've established a program for LLNL scientists and engineers to join a company for up to three ... for the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security ...

252

Search - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

White captures second award for nuclear forensics work. November 15, 2013. Giving animals in need a HOME. November 14, 2013. LLNL, Intel, Cray produce ...

253

Technologies - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Director search process gets under way. November 26, 2013. Employee selected as Face of Stroke ambassador. November 26, 2013. LLNL Home. Latest News ...

254

Inventors - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Director search process gets under way. November 26, 2013. Employee selected as Face of Stroke ambassador. November 26, 2013. LLNL Home. Latest News ...

255

Reducing the solid waste stream: reuse and recycling at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In Fiscal Year (FY) 1996 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) increased its solid waste diversion by 365 percent over FY 1992 in five solid waste categories - paper, cardboard, wood, metals, and miscellaneous. (LLNL`s fiscal year is from October 1 to September 30.) LLNL reused/ recycled 6,387 tons of waste, including 340 tons of paper, 455 tons of scrap wood, 1,509 tons of metals, and 3,830 tons of asphalt and concrete (Table1). An additional 63 tons was diverted from landfills by donating excess food, selling toner cartridges for reconditioning, using rechargeable batteries, redirecting surplus equipment to other government agencies and schools, and comporting plant clippings. LLNL also successfully expanded its demonstration program to recycle and reuse construction and demolition debris as part of its facility-wide, comprehensive solid waste reduction programs.

Wilson, K. L.

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

256

Research collaboration opportunities at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) is a major research facility within the Department of Energy (DOE) complex. LLNL`s traditional mission is in Defense Programs, including a significant effort in non-proliferation and arms control. In terms of disciplinary areas, over 50% of our present research efforts are in the fields of large-scale computing, high energy-density physics, energy and environmental sciences, engineering, materials research, manufacturing, and biotechnology. The present decade presents new challenges to LLNL. Many factors have influenced us in modifying our research approach. The main driver is the realization that many scientific problems in our mission areas can best be solved by collaborative teams of experts. At LLNL we excel in physical sciences, but we need the expertise of many others, beyond our established areas of expertise. For example, to find an acceptable solution to reduce earthquake damage requires contributions from engineering, soil mechanics, hydrology, materials sciences, Geosciences, computer modeling, economics, law, and political science. In the pursuit of our mission goals, we are soliciting increased research collaborations with university faculty and students. The scientific and national security challenges facing us and our nation today are unprecedented. Pooling talents from universities, other research organizations, and the national laboratories will be an important approach to finding viable solutions.

Budwine, C.M.

1996-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

257

LVOC - Livermore Valley Open Campus  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

LVOC - Livermore Valley Open Campus LVOC - Livermore Valley Open Campus ↓ Case Studies | ↓ About LVOC Get to market faster Making the impossible possible Lawrence Livermore and Sandia National Laboratories are home to some of the world's most unique state-of-the art facilities and resources. For decades, we have been using our combined capabilities, including a workforce of over 7000 employees to solve complex problems for the nation. Visit the science and technology epicenter - the Livermore Valley Open Campus - just east of San Francisco in the Tri-Valley's innovation ecosystem to find out what problems we can solve for you. LVOC Flyer We Keep Industry on the Cutting Edge of Innovative Technology About the Livermore Valley Open Campus LVOC Rendering Open for Business: The Livermore Valley Open Campus is located at the

258

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

March/April 2008 March/April 2008 4 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Extending the Search for Extending the Search for A new imager will allow astrophysicists to study the atmospheres of distant planets. T HE discovery of other solar systems beyond ours has been the stuff of science fiction for decades. Great excitement greeted the positive identification of the first planet outside our solar system in 1995. Since then, scientists have identified approximately 250 extrasolar planets (exoplanets), but they have had no way to study the majority of these planets or their

259

DOE/EIS-0157-SA-01; Supplement Analysis for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Analysis Analysis S-1 March 1999 Findings ♦ This supplement analysis evaluated a set of new and modified projects and proposals and other new information and concluded that no supplementation of the 1992 EIS/EIR for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), Livermore, is needed. Either the projected impacts are within the bounds of the 1992 EIS/EIR, the impacts were anticipated by mitigation measures established in the 1992 EIS/EIR, or the incremental differences in impacts are not significant. ♦ While proposed increases in administrative limits for radioactive materials at LLNL might slightly increase radiological releases during accidents, the resulting consequences are expected to remain essentially the same as described in the 1992

260

Evaluation of HotSpot, Lawerence Livermore National Laboratory - June 11,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Evaluation of HotSpot, Lawerence Livermore National Laboratory - Evaluation of HotSpot, Lawerence Livermore National Laboratory - June 11, 2010 Evaluation of HotSpot, Lawerence Livermore National Laboratory - June 11, 2010 June 11, 2010 Letter from Andy Lawrence to John Nasstrom accepting the revised Hotspot In your letter dated April 16, 2010, you summarized the work done by the Lawerence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) to meet the Department of Energy's (DOE) recommendations from the 2007, Software Evaluation of HotSpot, and DOE, Safety Software Toolbox Recommendation, for inclusion of V2.07 in the DOE Safety Software Central Registry. Based on this work, you futher requested that HotSpot be included in the DOE Central Registry. Letter from Andy Lawrence to John Nasstrom accepting the revised Hotspot More Documents & Publications

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "llnl livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

UC Regents Visit Lawrence Livermore  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of a regional-scale earthquake simulation at TSF and were briefed on the Lab's response to the Fukushima Daiichi power plant disaster in Japan. Livermore Mayor John...

262

Print - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

... or in home healthcare settings. ... Operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration

263

Technologies - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Information & Communication. Industrial Partnerships Office P.O. Box 808, L-795 Livermore, CA 94551 Phone: (925) 422-6416 Fax: (925) 423-8988

264

A probabilistic risk assessment of the LLNL Plutonium facility`s evaluation basis fire operational accident  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Plutonium Facility conducts numerous involving plutonium to include device fabrication, development of fabrication techniques, metallurgy research, and laser isotope separation. A Safety Analysis Report (SAR) for the building 332 Plutonium Facility was completed rational safety and acceptable risk to employees, the public, government property, and the environment. This paper outlines the PRA analysis of the Evaluation Basis Fire (EDF) operational accident. The EBF postulates the worst-case programmatic impact event for the Plutonium Facility.

Brumburgh, G.

1994-08-31T23:59:59.000Z

265

Summary Report of Summer 2009 NGSI Human Capital Development Efforts at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

In 2009, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) engaged in several activities to support NA-24's Next Generation Safeguards Initiative (NGSI). This report outlines LLNL's efforts to support Human Capital Development (HCD), one of five key components of NGSI managed by Dunbar Lockwood in the Office of International Regimes and Agreements (NA-243). There were five main LLNL summer safeguards HCD efforts sponsored by NGSI: (1) A joint Monterey Institute of International Studies/Center for Nonproliferation Studies-LLNL International Safeguards Policy and Information Analysis Course; (2) A Summer Safeguards Policy Internship Program at LLNL; (3) A Training in Environmental Sample Analysis for IAEA Safeguards Internship; (4) Safeguards Technology Internships; and (5) A joint LLNL-INL Summer Safeguards Lecture Series. In this report, we provide an overview of these five initiatives, an analysis of lessons learned, an update on the NGSI FY09 post-doc, and an update on students who participated in previous NGSI-sponsored LLNL safeguards HCD efforts.

Dougan, A; Dreicer, M; Essner, J; Gaffney, A; Reed, J; Williams, R

2009-11-16T23:59:59.000Z

266

Awards and Patents - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Roger Werne, Deputy Director of IPO, has created the LLNL Entrepreneurs Hall of Fame. On October 12 fifteen former LLNL scientists and engineers were recognized for ...

267

Compton Imaging System - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

LLNL Home. Latest News Headlines. LLNL, Intel, Cray produce big data machine. November 4, 2013. First results from most sensitive dark matter detector. October 31, 2013.

268

Ceramic Filters - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

LLNL Home. Latest News Headlines. LLNL, Intel, Cray produce big data machine. November 4, 2013. First results from most sensitive dark matter detector. October 31, 2013.

269

Research and Technology - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

LLNL Home. Latest News Headlines. LLNL, Intel, Cray produce big data machine. November 4, 2013. First results from most sensitive dark matter detector. October 31, 2013.

270

Tech Transfer - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

LLNL Home. Latest News Headlines. LLNL, Intel, Cray produce big data machine. November 4, 2013. First results from most sensitive dark matter detector. October 31, 2013.

271

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Surface Water Protection: A Watershed Approach  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This surface water protection plan (plan) provides an overview of the management efforts implemented at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) that support a watershed approach to protect surface water. This plan fulfills a requirement in the Department of Energy (DOE) Order 450.1A to demonstrate a watershed approach for surface water protection that protects the environment and public health. This plan describes the use of a watershed approach within which the Laboratory's current surface water management and protections efforts have been structured and coordinated. With more than 800 million acres of land in the U.S. under federal management and stewardship, a unified approach across agencies provides enhanced resource protection and cost-effectiveness. The DOE adopted, along with other federal agencies, the Unified Federal Policy for a Watershed Approach to Federal Land and Resource Management (UFP) with a goal to protect water quality and aquatic ecosystems on federal lands. This policy intends to prevent and/or reduce water pollution from federal activities while fostering a cost-effective watershed approach to federal land and resource management. The UFP also intends to enhance the implementation of existing laws (e.g., the Clean Water Act [CWA] and National Environmental Policy Act [NEPA]) and regulations. In addition, this provides an opportunity for the federal government to serve as a model for water quality stewardship using a watershed approach for federal land and resource activities that potentially impact surface water and its uses. As a federal land manager, the Laboratory is responsible for a small but important part of those 800 million acres of land. Diverse land uses are required to support the Laboratory's mission and provide an appropriate work environment for its staff. The Laboratory comprises two sites: its main site in Livermore, California, and the Experimental Test Site (Site 300), near Tracy, California. The main site is largely developed yet its surface water system encompasses two arroyos, an engineered detention basin (Lake Haussmann), storm channels, and wetlands. Conversely, the more rural Site 300 includes approximately 7,000 acres of largely undeveloped land with many natural tributaries, riparian habitats, and wetland areas. These wetlands include vernal pools, perennial seeps, and emergent wetlands. The watersheds within which the Laboratory's sites lie provide local and community ecological functions and services which require protection. These functions and services include water supply, flood attenuation, groundwater recharge, water quality improvement, wildlife and aquatic habitats, erosion control, and (downstream) recreational opportunities. The Laboratory employs a watershed approach to protect these surface water systems. The intent of this approach, presented in this document, is to provide an integrated effort to eliminate or minimize any adverse environmental impacts of the Laboratory's operations and enhance the attributes of these surface water systems, as possible and when reasonable, to protect their value to the community and watershed. The Laboratory's watershed approach to surface water protection will use the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Watershed Framework and guiding principles of geographic focus, scientifically based management and partnerships1 as a foundation. While the Laboratory's unique site characteristics result in objectives and priorities that may differ from other industrial sites, these underlying guiding principles provide a structure for surface water protection to ensure the Laboratory's role in environmental stewardship and as a community partner in watershed protection. The approach includes pollution prevention, continual environmental improvement, and supporting, as possible, community objectives (e.g., protection of the San Francisco Bay watershed).

Coty, J

2009-03-16T23:59:59.000Z

272

Livermore energy policy model and projections of energy futures for the Gas Research Institute  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Energy and Resource Planning Group at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) was asked by the Gas Research Institute to evaluate ten of their research projects relative to proposed funding levels for 1982. These energy technology projects included gas from unconventional and synthetic sources as well as utilization technologies. The primary tool used in the evaluation was the LLNL Energy Policy Model (EPM). The report gives background information about the study, the basic assumptions used in the study, and some conclusions, and presents selected supporting results from the EPM runs.

Castleton, R.

1981-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

273

LLNL-JRNL-417122 Compatible Relaxation and  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

LLNL-JRNL-417122 Compatible Relaxation and Coarsening in Algebraic Multigrid J. J. Brannick, R. D 94551 (rfalgout@llnl.gov). This work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy

274

LLNL sustainability efforts recognized by NNSA  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

in consumables and 40,000 person-hours per year of time spent managing NIF hazards. LLNL sustainability efforts recognized by NNSA Breanna Bishop, LLNL, (925) 423-9802,...

275

LLNL-PRES-407935 Mirror Status Workshop  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

LLNL-PRES-407935 Mirror Status Workshop September 8-9, 2008 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; #12; #12; #12;LLNL-PRES-406923 Comments-9 September 2008 R. F. Post, LLNL MW08-01 #12;The Kinetic Stabilizer concept allows the use of axisymmetric

276

LLNL receives accolades from EPA's Federal Green Challenge  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

713green 05172013 LLNL receives accolades from EPA's Federal Green Challenge Jennie L Doman, LLNL, (925) 423-2216, doman3@llnl.gov Printer-friendly LLNL has received accolades...

277

ew LLNL detection technology identifies bacteria, viruses, other...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Journal of Virology U.S. Food and Drug Administration Social Media Logos Follow LLNL on YouTube Subscribe to LLNL's RSS feed Follow LLNL on Facebook Follow LLNL on Twitter...

278

Evaluation of Cavity Collapse and Surface Crater Formation for Selected Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Underground Nuclear Tests - 2011, Part 2  

SciTech Connect

This report evaluates collapse evolution for selected Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) underground nuclear tests at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS, formerly called the Nevada Test Site). The work is being done to support several different programs that desire access to the ground surface above expended underground nuclear tests. The programs include: the Borehole Management Program, the Environmental Restoration Program, and the National Center for Nuclear Security Gas-Migration Experiment. Safety decisions must be made before a crater area, or potential crater area, can be reentered for any work. Evaluation of cavity collapse and crater formation is input into the safety decisions. Subject matter experts from the LLNL Containment Program who participated in weapons testing activities perform these evaluations. Information used included drilling and hole construction, emplacement and stemming, timing and sequence of the selected test and nearby tests, geology, yield, depth of burial, collapse times, surface crater sizes, cavity and crater volume estimations, ground motion, and radiological release information. Both classified and unclassified data were reviewed. The evaluations do not include the effects of erosion that may modify the collapse craters over time. They also do not address possible radiation dangers that may be present. Various amounts of information are available for these tests, depending on their age and other associated activities. Lack of data can hamper evaluations and introduce uncertainty. We make no attempt to quantify this uncertainty. Evaluation of Cavity Collapse and Surface Crater Formation for Selected Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Underground Nuclear Tests - 2011 was published on March 2, 2011. This report, considered Part 2 of work undertaken in calendar year 2011, compiles evaluations requested after the March report. The following unclassified summary statements describe collapse evolution and crater stability in response to a recent request to review 6 LLNL test locations in Yucca Flat, Rainier Mesa, and Pahute Mesa. They include: Baneberry in U8d; Clearwater in U12q; Wineskin in U12r, Buteo in U20a and Duryea in nearby U20a1; and Barnwell in U20az.

Pawloski, G A

2012-01-30T23:59:59.000Z

279

Livermore Biomass Facility | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

| Sign Up Search Page Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon Livermore Biomass Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Livermore Biomass Facility Facility...

280

Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 2013 Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - February 2013 February 2013 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Operational Drill at the B332...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "llnl livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

From Pilot to Practice - Streamlining Procurement and Engineering at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

16.33> BACKGROUND Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL, http://www.llnl.gov) is a research and development facility owned by the U.S. Department of Energy and managed by the University of California. It was founded in 1952 as a sister lab of the Los Alamos National Laboratory and is located in Livermore, California. Organization The Lab has about 8,000 employees and an annual budget of $1 billion. Its programs include biology and biotechnology; defense and nuclear technologies; energy programs; environmental programs; laser programs; and non-proliferation, arms control and International security. The programs are supported by more general scientific and engineering directorates chemistry and material science; computation; engineering; and physics, and space technology (Figure 1). Director's Office Research Programs Biology and Biotechnology Research Defense and Nuclear Technologies Energy Programs Laser Programs Non-

Judith Gebauer; Frank Frber

2000-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

282

Natural Phenomena Hazards Modeling Project: Seismic Hazard Models for Department of Energy Sites  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) has developed seismic and wind hazard models for the Office of Nuclear Safety (ONS), Department of Energy (DOE). The work is part of a three-phase effort aimed at establishing uniform building design criteria for seismic and wind hazards at DOE sites throughout the US. In Phase 1, LLNL gathered information on the sites and their critical facilities, including nuclear reactors, fuel-reprocessing plants, high-level waste storage and treatment facilities, and special nuclear material facilities. In Phase 2, development of seismic and wind hazard models, was initiated. These hazard models express the annual probability that the site will experience an earthquake or wind speed greater than some specified magnitude. This report summarizes the final seismic hazard models and response spectra recommended for each site and the methodology used to develop these models. 15 references, 2 figures, 1 table.

Coats, D.W.; Murray, R.C.

1984-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

283

LLNL-TR-408176 The Axisymmetric Tandem Mirror: A  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

LLNL-TR-408176 The Axisymmetric Tandem Mirror: A Magnetic Mirror Concept Game Changer Magnet Mirror of Magnetic Mirror Status #12;Berkeley Workshop Participants Others Interested David Baldwin, LLNL/GA Rick, LLNL George Miley, U. Illinois Ron Cohen, LLNL Gary Porter, LLNL Don Correll, LLNL John Santarius, U

284

Site environmental report for 1996  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

To help verify effective protection of public safety and preservation of the environment, Sandia National Laboratories (SNL)/California maintains an extensive, ongoing environmental monitoring program. This program monitors all significant airborne and liquid effluents and the environment at the SNL/California site perimeter. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) performs off-site environmental monitoring for both sites. These monitoring efforts ensure that emission controls are effective in preventing contamination of the environment. As part of SNL/California`s Environmental Monitoring Program, an environmental surveillance system measures the possible presence of radioactive and hazardous materials in ambient air, surface water, groundwater, sewage, soil, vegetation, and locally produced food-stuffs. The program also includes an extensive environmental dosimetry program, which measures external radiation levels around the Livermore site and nearby vicinity. Each year, the results of the Environmental Monitoring Program are published in this report, the Site Environmental Report. This executive summary focuses on impacts to the environment and estimated radiation doses to the public from site emissions. Chapter 3, {open_quotes}Compliance Summary,{close_quotes} reviews the site`s various environmental protection activities and compliance status, with applicable environmental regulations. The effluent monitoring and environmental surveillance results for 1996 show that SNL/California operations had no harmful effects on the environment or the public. 37 figs., 12 tabs.

Holland, R.C.

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

285

LLNL Chemical Kinetics Modeling Group  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The LLNL chemical kinetics modeling group has been responsible for much progress in the development of chemical kinetic models for practical fuels. The group began its work in the early 1970s, developing chemical kinetic models for methane, ethane, ethanol and halogenated inhibitors. Most recently, it has been developing chemical kinetic models for large n-alkanes, cycloalkanes, hexenes, and large methyl esters. These component models are needed to represent gasoline, diesel, jet, and oil-sand-derived fuels.

Pitz, W J; Westbrook, C K; Mehl, M; Herbinet, O; Curran, H J; Silke, E J

2008-09-24T23:59:59.000Z

286

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Livermore  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6.W~~l 6.W~~l #II VA. 'lf,fi:'¥Ylj Nsffonal Nuclear Security Admfnfat111tlon Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Livermore Site Office PO Box 808, L-293 7000 East Avenue Livermore, California 94551-0808 !JAN 18 2013 3250 COR-M0-1/17/2013-490077 MEMORANDUM FOR KAREN L. BOARDMAN CHAIRPERSON FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PANEL FROM: v KIMBERLY DAVIS LEBAK "/'JJ. f /ti/ MANAGER ~ ..--r; tV[ SUBJECT: REFRENCE: Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for the Livermore Field Office 2012, Revision I Memorandum (K. Boardman/Distribution), Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2012, dated October 24, 2012 Please see the attached revised Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for the Livermore

287

Inquiry into the De-Inventory of Special Nuclear Material at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, OAS-L-12-11  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Inquiry into the De-Inventory of Special Nuclear Material at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory OAS-L-12-11 September 2012 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 21, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, LIVERMORE SITE OFFICE FROM: David Sedillo Director, Western Audits Division Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Special Report on "Inquiry into the De-Inventory of Special Nuclear Material at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory" BACKGROUND The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore) is a Department of Energy facility managed and operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS), for the Department's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). Livermore's mission is to

288

Technologies - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Harmonic Air Motor; Two Stage Engine Technology; Industrial Partnerships Office P.O. Box 808, L-795 Livermore, CA 94551 Phone: (925) 422-6416 Fax: (925) 423-8988

289

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: Phonebook  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Phonebook Phonebook Address and Phone Numbers Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 7000 East Ave., Livermore, CA 94550-9234( For deliveries, enter off of Greenville Road) P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA 94551-0808 (Mail) Main Operator (925) 422-1100 Fax (925) 422-1370, Fax verification (925) 422-1100 Employment Verification Hot Line (925) 422-9348 Public Affairs (925) 422-4599 Search for individuals by last name or full name. Use * for a wildcard. Phonebook: Warning: This Electronic Phonebook is provided solely for official use by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory community. Using information obtained from this Phonebook to contact individuals for purposes other than official Laboratory business is forbidden. If you have any questions, please contact Public Affairs at (925) 422-4599.

290

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Emergency Response Capability 2009 Baseline Needs Assessment Performance Assessment  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document was prepared by John A. Sharry, LLNL Fire Marshal and Division Leader for Fire Protection and was reviewed by Sandia/CA Fire Marshal, Martin Gresho. This document is the second of a two-part analysis of Emergency Response Capabilities of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The first part, 2009 Baseline Needs Assessment Requirements Document established the minimum performance criteria necessary to meet mandatory requirements. This second part analyses the performance of Lawrence Livermore Laboratory Emergency Management Department to the contents of the Requirements Document. The document was prepared based on an extensive review of information contained in the 2004 BNA, a review of Emergency Planning Hazards Assessments, a review of building construction, occupancy, fire protection features, dispatch records, LLNL alarm system records, fire department training records, and fire department policies and procedures. On October 1, 2007, LLNL contracted with the Alameda County Fire Department to provide emergency response services. The level of service called for in that contract is the same level of service as was provided by the LLNL Fire Department prior to that date. This Compliance Assessment will evaluate fire department services beginning October 1, 2008 as provided by the Alameda County Fire Department.

Sharry, J A

2009-12-30T23:59:59.000Z

291

Enforcement Documents - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Enforcement Documents - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory July 22, 2013 Enforcement Letter, NEL-2013-03 Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC related to Programmatic Deficiencies in the Software Quality Assurance Program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory February 23, 2006 Preliminary Notice of Violation, University of California - EA-2006-01 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to the University of California related to Radiological Uptakes, a Radioactive Material Spill, and Radiological Protection Program, Quality Assurance, and Safety Basis Deficiencies at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory June 2, 2005 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005

292

The Harold Brown view: LLNL then and now  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Harold Brown was the Laboratory's third Director, serving from 1960 to 1961. He joined the Livermore laboratory in 1952. At Livermore, Brown worked on the Polaris warhead and on Project Plowshare, program designed to apply nuclear explosives to peaceful uses (such as excavating harbors). Brown succeeded Edward Teller as Director of the Livermore Laboratory in July 1960. His tenure as Director was particularly challenging as these were the years of the moratorium on nuclear testing. He was the driving force in expanding the Laboratory's capabilities for simulating nuclear explosions with computers. As part of LLNL's 40th anniversary observances, Brown was invited to lecture on his views of the changing world and the role of the Laboratory. He reminisced about events that occurred in the Laboratory's early years, with an eye to finding lessons for the future. In particular, he cited Project Plowshare and the MX ICBM as examples of projects that were technologically and economically feasible but unacceptable in terms of public perception. Brown also discussed the international security environment and the Laboratory's role in support of the national security goals of the United States. He defined U.S. security as protecting America against external threats to its physical survival, to its democratic form of government, or to the well-being of the people of the United States. By this definition, issues of international trade and market access have a strong bearing on national security. Thus the Laboratory can find much important and interesting work to do under the heading of national security and economic competitiveness. Brown also pointed out, however, that working effectively with the private sector will take a change in culture since the private-sector market is very different from and more competitive than the nuclear weapons world or the government's nondefense market.

Brown, H. (Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, DC (United States))

1993-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

293

LLNL Scientists Use NERSC to Advance Global Aerosol Simulations  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

While ''greenhouse gases'' have been the focus of climate change research for a number of years, DOE's ''Aerosol Initiative'' is now examining how aerosols (small particles of approximately micron size) affect the climate on both a global and regional scale. Scientists in the Atmospheric Science Division at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) are using NERSC's IBM supercomputer and LLNL's IMPACT (atmospheric chemistry) model to perform simulations showing the historic effects of sulfur aerosols at a finer spatial resolution than ever done before. Simulations were carried out for five decades, from the 1950s through the 1990s. The results clearly show the effects of the changing global pattern of sulfur emissions. Whereas in 1950 the United States emitted 41 percent of the world's sulfur aerosols, this figure had dropped to 15 percent by 1990, due to conservation and anti-pollution policies. By contrast, the fraction of total sulfur emissions of European origin has only dropped by a factor of 2 and the Asian emission fraction jumped six fold during the same time, from 7 percent in 1950 to 44 percent in 1990. Under a special allocation of computing time provided by the Office of Science INCITE (Innovative and Novel Computational Impact on Theory and Experiment) program, Dan Bergmann, working with a team of LLNL scientists including Cathy Chuang, Philip Cameron-Smith, and Bala Govindasamy, was able to carry out a large number of calculations during the past month, making the aerosol project one of the largest users of NERSC resources. The applications ran on 128 and 256 processors. The objective was to assess the effects of anthropogenic (man-made) sulfate aerosols. The IMPACT model calculates the rate at which SO{sub 2} (a gas emitted by industrial activity) is oxidized and forms particles known as sulfate aerosols. These particles have a short lifespan in the atmosphere, often washing out in about a week. This means that their effects on climate tend to be more regional, occurring near the area where the SO{sub 2} is emitted. To accurately study these regional effects, Bergmann needed to run the simulations at a finer horizontal resolution, as the coarser resolution (typically 300km by 300km) of other climate models are insufficient for studying changes on a regional scale. Livermore's use of CAM3, the Community Atmospheric Model which is a high-resolution climate model developed at NCAR (with collaboration from DOE), allows a 100km by 100km grid to be applied. NERSC's terascale computing capability provided the needed computational horsepower to run the application at the finer level.

Bergmann, D J; Chuang, C; Rotman, D

2004-10-13T23:59:59.000Z

294

RussiaLLNL2-web.indd  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Right: Simulated evolution of the Rayleigh-Taylor instability. Modified for the Web Several dynamic strength models have been implemented in LLNL hydrocodes, including the...

295

LLNL Supercomputing Facility Achieves LEED Gold  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Alison Terrill, ArchitectLEED AP Jennifer Doman, Pollution PreventionSustainability Program LLNL Supercomputing Facility Achieves LEED Gold This work performed under...

296

Deadline approaches for Lawrence Livermore National Security...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

should check with LLNS office to ensure applications were received Lynda L Seaver, LLNL, (925) 423-3103, seaver1@llnl.gov The deadline for submitting applications to Lawrence...

297

LLNL-PROC-491657 A Study  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PROC-491657 PROC-491657 A Study of the Large Block Test as an Analog for Geothermal Site Characterization S. Johnson August 1, 2011 Fall Meeting of the American Geophysical Union San Francisco, CA, United States December 5, 2011 through December 9, 2011 Disclaimer This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, nor any of their employees makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or

298

Screening Program Reduced Melanoma Mortality at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 1984-1996  

SciTech Connect

Worldwide incidence of cutaneous malignant melanoma has increased substantially, and no screening program has yet demonstrated reduction in mortality. We evaluated the education, self examination and targeted screening campaign at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) from its beginning in July 1984 through 1996. The thickness and crude incidence of melanoma from the years before the campaign were compared to those obtained during the 13 years of screening. Melanoma mortality during the 13-year period was based on a National Death Index search. Expected yearly deaths from melanoma among LLNL employees were calculated by using California mortality data matched by age, sex, and race/ethnicity and adjusted to exclude deaths from melanoma diagnosed before the program began or before employment at LLNL. After the program began, crude incidence of melanoma thicker than 0.75 mm decreased from 18 to 4 cases per 100,000 person-years (p = 0.02), while melanoma less than 0.75mm remained stable and in situ melanoma increased substantially. No eligible melanoma deaths occurred among LLNL employees during the screening period compared with a calculated 3.39 expected deaths (p = 0.034). Education, self examination and selective screening for melanoma at LLNL significantly decreased incidence of melanoma thicker than 0.75 mm and reduced the melanoma-related mortality rate to zero. This significant decrease in mortality rate persisted for at least 3 yr after employees retired or otherwise left the laboratory.

Schneider, MD, J S; II, PhD, D; MD, PhD, M

2006-10-12T23:59:59.000Z

299

Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 1996 Annual Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics (IGPP) is a Multicampus Research Unit of the University of California (UC). IGPP was founded in 1946 at UC Los Angeles with a charter to further research in the earth and planetary sciences and in related fields. The Institute now has branches at UC campuses in Los Angeles, San Diego, and Riverside, and at Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore national laboratories. The University-wide IGPP has played an important role in establishing interdisciplinary research in the earth and planetary sciences. For example, IGPP was instrumental in founding the fields of physical oceanography and space physics, which at the time fell between the cracks of established university departments. Because of its multicampus orientation, IGPP has sponsored important interinstitutional consortia in the earth and planetary sciences. Each of the five branches has a somewhat different intellectual emphasis as a result of the interplay between strengths of campus departments and Laboratory programs. The IGPP branch at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) was approved by the Regents of the University of California in 1982. IGPP-LLNL emphasizes research in seismology, geochemistry, cosmochemistry, and astrophysics. It provides a venue for studying the fundamental aspects of these fields, thereby complementing LLNL programs that pursue applications of these disciplines in national security and energy research. IGPP-LLNL is directed by Charles Alcock and was originally organized into three centers: Geosciences, stressing seismology; High-Pressure Physics, stressing experiments using the two-stage light-gas gun at LLNL; and Astrophysics, stressing theoretical and computational astrophysics. In 1994, the activities of the Center for High-Pressure Physics were merged with those of the Center for Geosciences. The Center for Geosciences, headed by Frederick Ryerson, focuses on research in geophysics and geochemistry. The Astrophysics Research Center, headed by Charles Alcock, provides a home for theoretical and observational astrophysics and serves as an interface with the Physics and Space Technology Department's Laboratory for Experimental Astrophysics and with other astrophysics efforts at LLNL. The IGPP branch at LLNL (as well as the branch at Los Alamos) also facilitates scientific collaborations between researchers at the UC campuses and those at the national laboratories in areas related to earth science, planetary science, and astrophysics. It does this by sponsoring the University Collaborative Research Program (UCRP), which provides funds to UC campus scientists for joint research projects with LLNL. The goals of the UCRP are to enrich research opportunities for UC campus scientists by making available to them some of LLNL's unique facilities and expertise, and to broaden the scientific program at LLNL through collaborative or interdisciplinary work with UC campus researchers. UCRP funds (provided jointly by the Regents of the University of California and by the Director of LLNL) are awarded annually on the basis of brief proposals, which are reviewed by a committee of scientists from UC campuses, LLNL programs, and external universities and research organizations. Typical annual funding for a collaborative research project ranges from $5,000 to $25,000. Funds are used for a variety of purposes, including salary support for visiting graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, and faculty; released-time salaries for LLNL scientists; and costs for experimental facilities. Although the permanent LLNL staff assigned to IGPP is relatively small (presently about five full-time equivalents), IGPP's research centers have become vital research organizations. This growth has been possible because of IGPP support for a substantial group of resident postdoctoral fellows; because of the 20 or more UCRP projects funded each year; and because IGPP hosts a variety of visitors, guests, and faculty members (from both UC and other institutions) on sabbatical leave. To focus attention on areas of topical interest i

Ryerson, F. J., Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics

1998-03-23T23:59:59.000Z

300

2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Lawrence Livermore National...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Lawrence Livermore National...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "llnl livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Review of earthquake hazard assessments of plant sites at Paducah, Kentucky and Portsmouth, Ohio  

SciTech Connect

Members of the US Geological Survey staff in Golden, Colorado, have reviewed the submissions of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) staff and of Risk Engineering, Inc. (REI) (Golden, Colorado) for seismic hazard estimates for Department of Energy facilities at Portsmouth, Ohio, and Paducah, Kentucky. We reviewed the historical seismicity and seismotectonics near the two sites, and general features of the LLNL and EPRI/SOG methodologies used by LLNL and Risk Engineering respectively, and also the separate Risk Engineering methodology used at Paducah. We discussed generic issues that affect the modeling of both sites, and performed alternative calculations to determine sensitivities of seismic hazard results to various assumptions and models in an attempt to assign reasonable bounding values of the hazard. In our studies we find that peak acceleration values of 0.08 g for Portsmouth and 0.32 g for Paducah represent central values of the, ground motions obtained at 1000-year return periods. Peak accelerations obtained in the LLNL and Risk Engineering studies have medians near these values (results obtained using the EPRI/SOG methodology appear low at both sites), and we believe that these medians are appropriate values for use in the evaluation of systems, structures, and components for seismic structural integrity and for the seismic design of new and improved systems, structures, and components at Portsmouth and Paducah.

NONE

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

302

final UFD M2 LLNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Radionuclide Radionuclide Interaction and Transport in Representative Geologic Media Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Used Fuel Disposition Program Annie Kersting, Mavrik Zavarin, Pihong Zhao, Zurong Dai, and Susan Carroll (LLNL) Yifeng Wang, Andrew Miller, Scott James, (SNL) Paul Reimus (LANL) Liange Zheng, Lianchong Li, Jonny Rutqvist, Huihai Liu and Jens Birkholzer (LBNL) June 20, 2012 FCRD-UFD-2012-000154 2 DISCLAIMER This information was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the U.S. Government. Neither the U.S. Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness, of any information, apparatus,

303

The National Ignition Facility Data Requirements Tim Frazier and Alice Koniges, LLNL  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Ignition Facility Data Requirements Ignition Facility Data Requirements Tim Frazier and Alice Koniges, LLNL SC08 BOF: Computing with Massive and Persistent Data LLNL-PRES-408909. This work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52- 07NA27344 2 Target chamber One Terabyte of data to be downloaded in ~50 Minutes for each shot. 5 Full Aperture Backscatter Diagnostic Instrument Manipulator (DIM) Diagnostic Instrument Manipulator (DIM) X-ray imager Streaked x-ray detector VISAR Velocity Measurements Static x-ray imager FFLEX Hard x-ray spectrometer Near Backscatter Imager DANTE Soft x-ray temperature Diagnostic Alignment System Cross Timing System Each Diagnostic Produces Data that Requires Analysis 6 Tools are being built to manage and integrate:

304

Basic Research for an Era of Nuclear Energy at LBNL, LLNL, AND LANL | U.S.  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Basic Research for an Era of Nuclear Basic Research for an Era of Nuclear Energy at LBNL, LLNL, AND LANL Nuclear Physics (NP) NP Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of NP Spinoff Applications Spinoff Archives SBIR/STTR Applications of Nuclear Science and Technology Funding Opportunities Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) News & Resources Contact Information Nuclear Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-26/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3613 F: (301) 903-3833 E: sc.np@science.doe.gov More Information » Spinoff Archives Basic Research for an Era of Nuclear Energy at LBNL, LLNL, AND LANL Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Application/instrumentation: Basic Research for an Era of Nuclear Energy Developed at: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Lawrence Livermore National

305

LLNL scientists contributed to the latest Higgs Boson results...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

32113boson 03212013 LLNL scientists contributed to the latest Higgs Boson results announced by CERN Donald B Johnston, LLNL, (925) 423-4902, johnston19@llnl.gov Printer-friendly...

306

LLNL'S Yuan Ping receives DOE Early Career Research Program Award  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

LLNL'S Yuan Ping receives DOE Early Career Research Program Award Breanna Bishop, LLNL, (925) 423-9802, bishop33@llnl.gov Printer-friendly Yuan Ping stands next to the target...

307

Retinal prosthesis LLNL helped develop is approved by the FDA  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 For immediate release: 02152013 | NR-13-02-06 Retinal prosthesis LLNL helped develop is approved by the FDA Donald B Johnston, LLNL, (925) 423-4902, johnston19@llnl.gov...

308

100th shot for LLNL's 'gun in the desert'  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

09262012 | NR-12-09-04 100th shot for LLNL's 'gun in the desert' Robert H Hirschfeld, LLNL, (925) 422-2379, hirschfeld2@llnl.gov Printer-friendly The JASPER two-stage gas gun, as...

309

LLNL researchers develop first kinetic model of plasma focus...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

13013device 01302013 LLNL researchers develop first kinetic model of plasma focus device Anne M Stark, LLNL, (925) 422-9799, stark8@llnl.gov Printer-friendly Deuterium ion...

310

Expanding Your Horizons Conference, Lawrence Livermore National...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Lab Expanding Your Horizons Conference, Lawrence Livermore National Lab August 1, 2013 2:45PM EDT to August 31, 2013 3:45PM EDT University of the...

311

LLNL-TR-411568 Evaluation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

568 568 Evaluation of Simulated Precipitation in CCSM3: Annual Cycle Performance Metrics at Watershed Scales Peter J. Gleckler, David C. Bader March 26, 2009 Disclaimer This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, nor any of their employees makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the

312

LLNL-JRNL-501931 Generalized  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

JRNL-501931 JRNL-501931 Generalized displacement correlation method for estimating stress intensity factors P. Fu, S. M. Johnson, R. R. Settgast, C. R. Carrigan September 29, 2011 Engineering Fracture Mechanics Disclaimer This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, nor any of their employees makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or

313

LLNL-CONF-482708 Investigation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2708 2708 Investigation of Stimulation-Response Relationships for Complex Fracture Systems in Enhanced Geothermal Reservoirs P. Fu, S. M. Johnson, C. R. Carrigan May 5, 2011 35th Annual Meeting of the Geothermal Resources Council San Diego, CA, United States October 23, 2011 through October 26, 2011 Disclaimer This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, nor any of their employees makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein

314

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Former Production Workers...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Laboratory, Former Production Workers Screening Projects Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Former Production Workers Screening Projects Project Name: Worker Health Protection...

315

Technology application analyses at five Department of Energy Sites  

SciTech Connect

The Hazardous Waste Remedial Actions Program (HAZWRAP), a division of Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc., managing contractor for the Department of Energy (DOE) facilities in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, was tasked by the United States Air Force (USAF) through an Interagency Agreement between DOE and the USAF, to provide five Technology Application Analysis Reports to the USAF. These reports were to provide information about DOE sites that have volatile organic compounds contaminating soil or ground water and how the sites have been remediated. The sites were using either a pump-and-treat technology or an alternative to pump-and-treat. The USAF was looking at the DOE sites for lessons learned that could be applied to Department of Defense (DoD) problems in an effort to communicate throughout the government system. The five reports were part of a larger project undertaken by the USAF to look at over 30 sites. Many of the sites were DoD sites, but some were in the private sector. The five DOE projects selected to be reviewed came from three sites: the Savannah River Site (SRS), the Kansas City Site, and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). SRS and LLNL provided two projects each. Both provided a standard pump-and-treat application as well as an innovative technology that is an alternative to pump-and-treat. The five reports on these sites have previously been published separately. This volume combines them to give the reader an overview of the whole project.

NONE

1995-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

316

LLNL Scientist Named NNSA Science and Technology Excellence Award...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > NNSA Blog > LLNL Scientist Named NNSA Science and Technology ... LLNL Scientist Named NNSA Science and...

317

Independent Oversight Review, Nevada Site Office - October 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Nevada Site Office - October 2011 Nevada Site Office - October 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Nevada Site Office - October 2011 October 2011 Review of Nevada Site Office Criticality Safety Assessments at the Criticality Experiments Facility and Training Assembly for Criticality Safety and Appraisal of the Criticality Experiments Facility Startup Plan The purpose of this independent review by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), was to shadow the Nevada Site Office (NSO) line oversight activities conducted August 29 - September 2, 2011, to determine the level of compliance of Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) with American National Standards Institute and American Nuclear

318

Livermore Contract Announcement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Livermore Contract Announcement Livermore Contract Announcement Livermore Contract Announcement May 8, 2007 - 12:45pm Addthis Remarks as Prepared for Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman Good afternoon. Thank you all for coming and welcome to the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory employees who are watching this on our Webcast. I know my remarks are of special importance to you. The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory opened in 1952 using the "team science" approach pioneered by Ernest O. Lawrence. Livermore was - and is - a place where "new ideas" are dominant. Few would have predicted back then how deeply the work conducted at Lawrence Livermore would influence the course of history. And yet it has. Today is the 123rd anniversary of President Harry S Truman's birth. The first Cold War president, Truman's decisive

319

LLNL hosts plasma physics summer school  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

(925) 423-9802, bishop33@llnl.gov L-R: Jerry Clark (Florida A&M), Professor Charles Weatherford (Florida A&M), Staci Brown (Florida A&M) and Sajan Shresthra (Benedict College)...

320

Fire science at LLNL: A review  

SciTech Connect

This fire sciences report from LLNL includes topics on: fire spread in trailer complexes, properties of welding blankets, validation of sprinkler systems, fire and smoke detectors, fire modeling, and other fire engineering and safety issues. (JEF)

Hasegawa, H.K. (ed.)

1990-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "llnl livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

LLNL woman pioneer Cecilia Larsen dies  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

10252013 Inset: Cecilia Larsen, holding a magnetic tape for the Univac computer at LLNL in 1960. She was 43 years old. Blue dress: Larsen at her granddaughter's wedding in...

322

LLNL oil shale project review  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Livermore's oil shale project is funded by two budget authorities, two thirds from base technology development and one third from environmental science. Our base technology development combines fundamental chemistry research with operation of pilot retorts and mathematical modeling. We've studied mechanisms for oil coking and cracking and have developed a detailed model of this chemistry. We combine the detailed chemistry and physics into oil shale process models (OSP) to study scale-up of generic second generation Hot-Recycled-Solid (HRS) retorting systems and compare with results from our 4 tonne-per-day continuous-loop HRS pilot retorting facility. Our environmental science program focuses on identification of gas, solid and liquid effluents from oil shale processes and development of abatement strategies where necessary. We've developed on-line instruments to quantitatively measure trace sulfur and nitrogen compounds released during shale pyrolysis and combustion. We've studied shale mineralogy, inorganic and organic reactions which generate and consume environmentally sensitive species. Figures, references, and tables are included with each discussion.

Cena, R.J. (ed.)

1990-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

323

Impact of the January-February 1980 earthquake sequence on various structures at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

On January 24, 1980, California's Livermore Valley was rocked by a moderate earthquake that caused some damage to the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). The earthquake, which measured 5.5 on the Richter scale and was centered about 20 km (12 mi) northwest of the Laboratory, produced estimated peak horizontal ground acceleration at LLNL of between 0.15 and 0.3 g. The earthquake was part of a sequence that included two sharp aftershocks (magnitudes 5.2 and 4.2) within 1.5 minutes of the initial event. A second earthquake (magnitude 5.8) struck on January 26, and several lesser earthquakes occurred during the next few weeks. This paper describes the damage impact of the January 24 earthquake, including: background information on LLNL, discussion of pre-earthquake seismic safety philosophy, and description of the impact of the January 24 earthquake, including a description of the seismic setting of the Laboratory, a discussion of the ground motion, and a summary of damage. This paper also describes a data gathering and reduction effort at LLNL in the aftermath of the January earthquakes.

Murray, R.C.; Nelson, T.A.; Coats, D.W.; Ng, D.S.; Weaver, H.J.

1981-02-04T23:59:59.000Z

324

Technology & Market Discovery - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Technology & Market Discovery. The commercialization of many technologies developed at LLNL require the market expertise and funding capabilty of the entrepreneurial ...

325

All News - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

R&D Magazine follows up on the success of laser peening, a technology developed at LLNL and licensed to Metal Improvement Company (MIC). Read More.

326

Lawrence Livermore National Laborotory Safety Basis Assessment...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of the safety basis for LLNL nuclear facilities. It describes the method for categorizing nuclear facilities and summarizes the resulting requirements for the contents of the DSA....

327

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: 60 Second Science  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

LLNL Click on images for high-resolution photos. More information R&D The LEOPARD (Laser Energy Optimization by Precision Adjustments to the Radiant Distribution) technology has...

328

All News - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Director search process gets under way. November 26, 2013. Employee selected as Face of Stroke ambassador. November 26, 2013. LLNL Home. Latest News ...

329

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | National Nuclear Security...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

(Official) Funding Mods Available Upon Request Conformed Contract (Unofficial) LLNL Sec A (SF33) (pdf, 91KB) See Modifications Section under Conformed Contract Link LLNS...

330

14 MeV neutron work at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

The 14 MeV neutron work at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) covers two main areas of interest to this Symposium: (1) measurements and calculations of differential cross sections; and (2) integral measurements of the neutron and gamma emission spectra. In both areas a large number of materials have been studied, spanning a wide mass range (6 < A < 239), of interest to fusion and hybrid reactors. In this presentation a brief description of the experimental techniques and calculational analysis is given for each of the above areas and the measured and calculated cross sections are discussed. 28 refs., 7 figs., 3 tabs.

Hansen, L.F.

1985-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

331

Sandia National Laboratories: Locations: Livermore, California...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

in the cities, on the beaches, and in the mountains. Top 15 hometowns of SandiaCalifornia employees Livermore (34%) Tracy (8%) Pleasanton (5%) Dublin (4%) Oakland (3%)...

332

Outline of UCRL-Livermore Rover Program  

SciTech Connect

This report describes the development plan, and problems which would be addressed, for the nuclear rocket engine design/UCRL-Livermore ROVER.

York, H.F.

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

333

Harmonic Air Motor - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Current Weather. Protocol Office. Where to stay. Tri-Valley Visitors Bureau. City of Livermore. Community. Our Community. Discovery Center. ... such ...

334

Electrostatic Generator/Motor - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

LLNL Home. Latest News Headlines. LLNL, Intel, Cray produce big data machine. November 4, 2013. First results from most sensitive dark matter detector. October 31, 2013.

335

Lawrence Livermore study finds human activity affects vertical...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

human activity affects vertical structure of atmospheric temperature Anne M Stark, LLNL, (925) 422-9799, stark8@llnl.gov Human influences have directly impacted the latitude...

336

LLNL Section I Clauses/Prescriptions  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

AC52-06NA27344 LLNL AC52-06NA27344 LLNL Section I, Page 56 Part II - Contract Clauses Section I I-1 CONTRACT CLAUSES Unless conditionally "Noted", all contract clauses are hereby incorporated by full text. The references cited herein are from the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) (48 CFR Chapter 1) and the Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) (48 CFR Chapter 9). Note: The titles and page locations of the clauses are as follows: CLAUSE TITLE PAGE I001 FAR 52.202-1 DEFINITIONS (JUL 2004) (DEVIATION) ..............................62 I002 FAR 52.203-3 GRATUTIES (APR 1984) ..........................................................63

337

Independent Oversight Review, Nevada Site Office - October 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- October 2011 - October 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Nevada Site Office - October 2011 October 2011 Review of Nevada Site Office Criticality Safety Assessments at the Criticality Experiments Facility and Training Assembly for Criticality Safety and Appraisal of the Criticality Experiments Facility Startup Plan The purpose of this independent review by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), was to shadow the Nevada Site Office (NSO) line oversight activities conducted August 29 - September 2, 2011, to determine the level of compliance of Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) with American National Standards Institute and American Nuclear

338

Sandia/California named winner of "Environmental Spirit" Award by Livermore  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

RELEASES RELEASES FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE January 31, 2008 Sandia/California named winner of "Environmental Spirit" Award by Livermore Chamber of Commerce LIVERMORE, Calif. -Sandia National Laboratories' Livermore, Calif., site has been selected by the Livermore Chamber of Commerce as recipient of its inaugural Environmental Spirit Award. The award was presented to Sandia for its environmental programs and ongoing commitment to protecting the environment, wildlife, and numerous species on the laboratory's 400-acre site, says Dale Kaye Chamber president and CEO. "Sandia has not only shown tremendous sensitivity to the land they occupy, but also a dedicated commitment to its community," says Kaye. "This is an organization that helps to protect our world and we are

339

Radioactive ion beam research at LLNL  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

In this paper we discuss efforts underway at LLNL to develop the technology for the measurement of proton and alpha-particle reactions with unstable nuclei which are necessary for understanding the nucleosynthesis and energy generation in hot hydrogen-burning environments. 16 refs., 5 figs.

Mathews, G.J.; Bauer, R.W.; Haight, R.C.; Sale, K.E.

1985-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

340

LLNL/Las Positas College 'Science and Engineering Seminar Series...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

313seminar 10032013 LLNLLas Positas College 'Science and Engineering Seminar Series' launches new season Carenda L Martin, LLNL, (925) 424-4175, martin59@llnl.gov Nick Be...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "llnl livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

LLNL-JRNL-407238 A Model for Stimulated Brillouin  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

LLNL-JRNL-407238 A Model for Stimulated Brillouin Backscattering and Ion Acoustic Wave Secondary in the primary SBS IAW which affects Landau damping and the IAW frequency. PACS: 52.38.-r 52.38.Bv LLNL

342

LLNL scientist finds topography of Eastern Seaboard muddles ancient...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4 For immediate release: 05162013 | NR-13-05-04 LLNL scientist finds topography of Eastern Seaboard muddles ancient sea level changes Anne M Stark, LLNL, (925) 422-9799,...

343

LLNL scientists pioneer the use of established technology for...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

concentrate sample with the aid of a near-infrared spectrometer. Photo by Steve WamplerLLNL LLNL scientists pioneer the use of established technology for analyzing uranium ore...

344

Summary Statistics for Fun Dough Data Acquired at LLNL  

SciTech Connect

Using x-ray computerized tomography (CT), we have characterized the x-ray linear attenuation coefficients (LAC) of a Play Dough{trademark}-like product, Fun Dough{trademark}, designated as PD. Table 1 gives the first-order statistics for each of four CT measurements, estimated with a Gaussian kernel density estimator (KDE) analysis. The mean values of the LAC range from a high of about 2100 LMHU{sub D} at 100kVp to a low of about 1100 LMHU{sub D} at 300kVp. The standard deviation of each measurement is around 1% of the mean. The entropy covers the range from 3.9 to 4.6. Ordinarily, we would model the LAC of the material and compare the modeled values to the measured values. In this case, however, we did not have the composition of the material and therefore did not model the LAC. Using a method recently proposed by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), we estimate the value of the effective atomic number, Z{sub eff}, to be near 8.5. LLNL prepared about 50mL of the Fun Dough{trademark} in a polypropylene vial and firmly compressed it immediately prior to the x-ray measurements. Still, layers can plainly be seen in the reconstructed images, indicating that the bulk density of the material in the container is affected by voids and bubbles. We used the computer program IMGREC to reconstruct the CT images. The values of the key parameters used in the data capture and image reconstruction are given in this report. Additional details may be found in the experimental SOP and a separate document. To characterize the statistical distribution of LAC values in each CT image, we first isolated an 80% central-core segment of volume elements ('voxels') lying completely within the specimen, away from the walls of the polypropylene vial. All of the voxels within this central core, including those comprised of voids and inclusions, are included in the statistics. We then calculated the mean value, standard deviation and entropy for (a) the four image segments and for (b) their digital gradient images. (A digital gradient image of a given image was obtained by taking the absolute value of the difference between the initial image and that same image offset by one voxel horizontally, parallel to the rows of the x-ray detector array.) The statistics of the initial image of LAC values are called 'first order statistics;' those of the gradient image, 'second order statistics.'

Kallman, J S; Morales, K E; Whipple, R E; Huber, R D; Brown, W D; Smith, J A; Schneberk, D J; Martz, Jr., H E; White, III, W T

2010-03-11T23:59:59.000Z

345

Summary Statistics for Homemade ?Play Dough? -- Data Acquired at LLNL  

SciTech Connect

Using x-ray computerized tomography (CT), we have characterized the x-ray linear attenuation coefficients (LAC) of a homemade Play Dough{trademark}-like material, designated as PDA. Table 1 gives the first-order statistics for each of four CT measurements, estimated with a Gaussian kernel density estimator (KDE) analysis. The mean values of the LAC range from a high of about 2700 LMHU{sub D} 100kVp to a low of about 1200 LMHUD at 300kVp. The standard deviation of each measurement is around 10% to 15% of the mean. The entropy covers the range from 6.0 to 7.4. Ordinarily, we would model the LAC of the material and compare the modeled values to the measured values. In this case, however, we did not have the detailed chemical composition of the material and therefore did not model the LAC. Using a method recently proposed by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), we estimate the value of the effective atomic number, Z{sub eff}, to be near 10. LLNL prepared about 50mL of the homemade 'Play Dough' in a polypropylene vial and firmly compressed it immediately prior to the x-ray measurements. We used the computer program IMGREC to reconstruct the CT images. The values of the key parameters used in the data capture and image reconstruction are given in this report. Additional details may be found in the experimental SOP and a separate document. To characterize the statistical distribution of LAC values in each CT image, we first isolated an 80% central-core segment of volume elements ('voxels') lying completely within the specimen, away from the walls of the polypropylene vial. All of the voxels within this central core, including those comprised of voids and inclusions, are included in the statistics. We then calculated the mean value, standard deviation and entropy for (a) the four image segments and for (b) their digital gradient images. (A digital gradient image of a given image was obtained by taking the absolute value of the difference between the initial image and that same image offset by one voxel horizontally, parallel to the rows of the x-ray detector array.) The statistics of the initial image of LAC values are called 'first order statistics;' those of the gradient image, 'second order statistics.'

Kallman, J S; Morales, K E; Whipple, R E; Huber, R D; Martz, A; Brown, W D; Smith, J A; Schneberk, D J; Martz, Jr., H E; White, III, W T

2010-03-11T23:59:59.000Z

346

Assessing the Economic Impact of LLNLs Additive Manufacturing ...  

Assessing the Economic Impact of LLNLs Additive Manufacturing Technology Danny Katz / Hannah Farqquar Market Intelligence Industrial Partnerships Office

347

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: Request Blocked  

If this does not unblock the URL, contact the LLNL Institutional Web Team. Please include the Support ID listed below in your e-mail. Your Support ID is: ...

348

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P. O. Box  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Massively Parallel Systems Donald F rederick, L LNL Presented a t S upercompu@ng ' 11 LLNL---PRES---508651 Case S tudy: O utline * Problem D escrip@on * Computa@onal A pproach *...

349

Researcher, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | National...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

appeared in the Nov. 28, 2008 edition of Science, shares the award. That paper included LLNL author Mike Fitzgerald with Paul Kalas of UC Berkeley serving as the lead author. Learn...

350

LLNL-JRNL-417371 On Long Range Interpolation  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

LLNL-JRNL-417371 On Long Range Interpolation Operators for Aggressive Coarsening Ulrike Meier Yang-CG applying various interpolation operators to Problem 4 (LLNL) with 500?500 grid points per processor using H times for Problem 4 (LLNL) with approximately 86,000 grid points per processor using H1 coarsening No

351

Progress in inertial confinement fusion at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

The goals of the Inertial Fusion Program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory are to study matter under extreme conditions of temperature and pressure and to produce fusion energy from inertially confined fusion fuel. With the conclusion of recent multi-kilojoule 0.53 ..mu..m experiments on Novette, we have demonstrated vastly improved plasma conditions compared to those previously obtained at LLNL with similar energies at 1.06 ..mu..m and elsewhere with 10 ..mu..m radiation. The lower preheat environment obtainable with short wavelength light has led to 3X improvements in the compression of targets on Novette compared to similar targets on Shiva with 1.06 ..mu..m. Subsequent experiments on Nova with short wavelength light will begin in 1985. They are expected to demonstrate the necessary compression conditions required for high gain fusion to occur when irradiated with a multi-megajoule driver. These recent results, together with improved calculations, and innovations in driver and reactor technology, indicate that high gain inertial fusion will occur and is a viable candidate for fusion power production in the future.

Holzrichter, J.F.

1984-08-06T23:59:59.000Z

352

Phase II Audit Report - Energy & Water Audits of LLNL Facilities  

SciTech Connect

This report describes Phase II of a project conducted for the Mechanical Utilities Division (UTel), Energy Management Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) by Architectural Energy Corporation (AEC). The overall project covers energy efficiency and water conservation auditing services for 215 modular and prefabricated buildings at LLNL. The primary goal of this project is to demonstrate compliance with DOE Order 430.2A, Contractor Requirements Document section 2.d (2) Document, to demonstrate annual progress of at least 10 percent toward completing energy and water audits of all facilities. Although this project covers numerous buildings, they are all similar in design and use. The approach employed for completing audits for these facilities involves a ''model-similar building'' approach. In the model-similar building approach, similarities between groups of buildings are established and quantified. A model (or test case) building is selected and analyzed for each model-similar group using a detailed DOE-2 simulation. The results are extended to the group of similar buildings based on careful application of quantified similarities, or ''extension measures''. This approach leverages the relatively minor effort required to evaluate one building in some detail to a much larger population of similar buildings. The facility wide energy savings potential was calculated for a select set of measures that have reasonable payback based on the detailed building analysis and are otherwise desirable to the LLNL facilities staff. The selected measures are: (1) HVAC Tune-up. This is considered to be a ''core measure'', based on the energy savings opportunity and the impact on thermal comfort. All HVAC units in the study are assumed to be tuned up under this measure. See the Appendix for a detailed calculation by building and HVAC unit. (2) HVAC system scheduling. This is also considered to be a ''core measure'', based on the energy savings opportunity and ability to control units centrally during a shelter-in-place event. All HVAC units in the study are assumed to be controlled under this measure. See the Appendix for a detailed calculation by building and HVAC unit. (3) Cool roof. Savings estimates for the measure were applied to all roofs scheduled for replacement in the LLNL deficiency list. See the Appendix for a detailed calculation by building. (4) Window shading. Savings estimates for the measure were applied to all non-north facing windows. Although the simple payback is not a good for this measure, it should be considered for the associated benefits on thermal comfort and to alleviate some of the zoning and thermostat placement issues. (5) HVAC upgrade at normal replacement. Savings estimates for the measure were applied to all HVAC units scheduled for replacement on the LLNL deficiency list. A total of 642 units (about 55% of the total) are on the replacement list, so this represents a major opportunity. See the Appendix for a detailed calculation by building and HVAC unit. (6) Indirect/direct evaporative cooling. Savings estimates for the measure were applied to all HVAC units scheduled for replacement on the LLNL deficiency list. See the Appendix for a detailed calculation by building and HVAC unit. Due to the magnitude of the potential energy savings, this measure should be considered as the new generation IDEC systems become commercially available. (7) Super T-8's. Savings estimates for this measure were applied to all buildings in the study, assuming that the new generation lamps will be rotated in during normal lamp replacement operations. See the Appendix for a detailed calculation by building. (8) Occupancy sensors. Savings estimates for this measure were applied to buildings surveyed as candidates for occupancy sensors during the Level 1 audits. See the Appendix for a detailed calculation by building. (9) Remaining Lighting. Savings for this measure were calculated for each eligible fixture identified during the Lev

Horst, B I; Jacobs, P C; Pierce, S M

2005-08-03T23:59:59.000Z

353

LLNL-ABS-490222 Page 1 Session 5: Materials: Constitutive Properties...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Strengths Dynamic Strength Experiments at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory R. M. Cavallo Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA USA Summary: We...

354

FINAL CLOSURE PLAN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS CLOSURE, SITE 300  

SciTech Connect

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory of the University of California (LLNL) operates two Class II surface impoundments that store wastewater that is discharged from a number of buildings located on the Site 300 Facility (Site 300). The wastewater is the by-product of explosives processing. Reduction in the volume of water discharged from these buildings over the past several years has significantly reduced the wastewater storage needs. In addition, the impoundments were constructed in 1984, and the high-density polyethylene (HDPE) geomembrane liners are nearing the end of their service life. The purpose of this project is to clean close the surface impoundments and provide new wastewater storage using portable, above ground storage tanks at six locations. The tanks will be installed prior to closure of the impoundments and will include heaters for allowing evaporation during relatively cool weather. Golder Associates (Golder) has prepared this Final Closure Plan (Closure Plan) on behalf of LLNL to address construction associated with the clean closure of the impoundments. This Closure Plan complies with State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Section 21400 of the California Code of Regulations Title 27 (27 CCR {section}21400). As required by these regulations and guidance, this Plan provides the following information: (1) A site characterization, including the site location, history, current operations, and geology and hydrogeology; (2) The regulatory requirements relevant to clean closure of the impoundments; (3) The closure procedures; and, (4) The procedures for validation and documentation of clean closure.

Lane, J E; Scott, J E; Mathews, S E

2004-09-29T23:59:59.000Z

355

Sandia National Laboratories: Locations: Livermore, California...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

81,000, the city of Livermore maintains a local personality. Whether you are a sports fan, wine connoisseur, or outdoor enthusiast, you will have plenty to see and do. Pavilion...

356

Science on Saturday @ Lawrence Livermore Lab  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Science on Saturday. Science on Saturday (SOS) is a series of science lectures for middle and high school students. Each topic highlights cutting-edge science occurring at the Lawrence Livermore...

357

Final LLNL Volume 1 - ES&H 2002.PDF  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance Office of the Secretary of Energy July 2002 ISM Volume I INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT INSPECTION OF ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY, AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT AT THE LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY Volume I July 2002 i INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT INSPECTION OF ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY, AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT AT THE LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY Volume I Table Of Contents Acronyms .........................................................................................................................................iii 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................1

358

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- July 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

359

Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- May 2007  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Programs at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

360

2004 LLNL ES&H.pmd  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Health Management at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance Office of Security and Safety Performance Assurance Office of the Secretary of Energy December 2004 ISM Volume I Summary Report OVERSIGHT Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................1 2.0 POSITIVE ATTRIBUTES .............................................................3 3.0 WEAKNESSES ............................................................................5 4.0 SUMMARY ASSESSMENT .........................................................8 5.0 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................ 12 6.0 RATINGS ...................................................................................

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "llnl livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

WCI | Cutting-Edge Facilities | Site 300 Experimental Test Site  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Site 300 Site Access Contained Firing Facility (CFF) Continuously Operating Reference Station (CORS) What is Site 300? Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Site 300 is an experimental test site operated by the Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration. It is situated on 7,000 acres in rural foothills approximately six miles southwest of downtown Tracy and 15 miles southeast of Livermore. Site 300 was established in 1955 as a non-nuclear explosives test facility to support Livermore Laboratory's national security mission. The site gets its name from the early days of Lawrence Livermore, when the main laboratory was called Site 200 and the test facility was Site 300 (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory was Site 100). Today, work at Site 300

362

Design of a cone-penetrometer-compatible probe and housing: The LLNL Raman probe  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

probe designed for cone penetrometer and hand-held use and constructed at Lawrence Livermore National There exist 177 underground storage tanks at the U.S. Department of Energy DOE Hanford site that have been in a few hours from surface to bottom. Applied Re- search Associates ARA was contracted by DOE Hanford

Myrick, Michael Lenn

363

IBM, Lawrence Livermore researchers form 'Deep Computing Solutions...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

collaboration to help boost U.S. industrial competitiveness Donald B Johnston, LLNL, (925) 423-4902, johnston19@llnl.gov Printer-friendly Two racks of Vulcan, the new...

364

Lawrence Livermore signs agreement to work with Center for Urban...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

signs agreement to work with Center for Urban Science and Progress Stephen P Wampler, LLNL, (925) 423-3107, wampler1@llnl.gov Printer-friendly In the future, researchers from...

365

Sandia National Laboratories: Locations: Livermore, California  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Livermore, California Livermore, California Livermore, California administration building For more than 50 years, the California campus of Sandia National Laboratories has delivered essential science and technology to resolve the nation's most challenging security issues. Many of these challenges - like energy resources, transportation, immigration, ports, and more - surfaced early in the state of California, providing Sandia/California with a special opportunity to participate in the first wave of solutions to important national problems. For example, Sandia's scientists are breaking new ground in energy research and are helping to accelerate the development of next-generation biofuels so that we can reduce our nation's dependence on foreign oil and mitigate the effects of global climate change.

366

FY 2006 University of California (LLNL), PER Summary | National...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2006 University of California (LLNL), PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project...

367

Use of LLNL-developed laser peening spreads  

Use of LLNL-developed laser peening spreads When it made its maiden flight on December 15, the Boeing 787 Dreamliner was powered

368

LANL, LLNL researchers among Early Career Research Program award...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Follow this link to skip to the main content Facebook Flickr RSS Twitter YouTube LANL, LLNL researchers among Early Career Research Program award recipients | National Nuclear...

369

Final LLNL Volume 1 - ES&H 2002.PDF  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10 years) in non-optimal storage conditions (many drums are stored outside, exposed to weather). The disposition of legacy wastes, and other waste management activities, at LLNL...

370

LLNL Ready-to-Sign (RTS) Licensing Program  

Director search process gets under way. November 26, 2013. LLNL Home. Latest News Headlines. Change in Pacific nitrogen content tied to climate chan. ...

371

LLNL-TR-632239 Modeling Thermally Induced Failure  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

IM Release Number: LLNL-TR-632239 1 1 Introduction Wells for Engineered Geothermal Systems (EGS) occur in conditions that present significant challenges for...

372

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2003-04 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2003-04 September 3, 2003 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to the University of California related to an Extremity Radiological Overexposure at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, (EA-2003-04) This letter refers to the recent investigation by the Department of Energy's Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) of the June 2002 extremity radiological overexposure event. Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2003-04 More Documents & Publications Preliminary Notice of Violation, University of California - EA-2006-01 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -

373

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory December 13, 2004  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

John Lindl Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory December 13, 2004 The NIF Ignition Program Presentation to Fusion Power Associates Meeting #12;NIF-0202-0XXXXppt 15/GHM/tr Outline · Ignition Introduction 104 105 500 50 5 0.5 Capsule energy (KJ) NIF Relaxed pressure and stability requirements

374

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Kimberly S. Budil  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. Steven E. Koonin Under Secretary for Nuclear Security/NNSA Administrator Thomas P. D'Agostino Asst Livermore National Laboratory Historically, most HEDS research has been sponsored by NNSA NNSA's HEDP) Motivated and encouraged by National Academy/workshop reports: Federal response SC/NNSA: Joint Program

Shyy, Wei

375

DOE Selects Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC to Manage its  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC to Manage its Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC to Manage its Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory DOE Selects Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC to Manage its Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory May 8, 2007 - 12:45pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS) has been selected to be the management and operating contractor for DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California. "Livermore National Laboratory is a critical part of our nuclear weapons complex and has been for the last 55 years," Secretary Bodman said. "For the first time since the beginning of the laboratory a new contractor is

376

LLNL-CONF-409744 An Experiment to Tame the  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

LLNL-CONF-409744 An Experiment to Tame the Plasma Material Interface R. J. Goldston, J. E. Menard supported in part by U.S. DOE Contract # DE-AC02-76CH03073 Prepared by LLNL under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344

Harilal, S. S.

377

LLNL: Science and Technology in the National Interest  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Adobe Flash Player Science and Technology in the National Interest - FY2012 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Science and Technology in the National Interest - FY2012 PDF...

378

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- June 2, 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Enforcement Letter Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for Quality Assurance Deficiencies related to Weapon Activities, June 2, 2005

379

Evaluation of HotSpot, Lawerence Livermore National Laboratory...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Nasstrom accepting the revised Hotspot More Documents & Publications Excessing of Computers Used for Unclassified Controlled Information at Lawrence Livermore National...

380

Ltr._to_Gottlieb_-_Response_from_LLNL_75_FR_72036_3-23-09.pdf...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Ltr.toGottlieb-ResponsefromLLNL75FR720363-23-09.pdf Ltr.toGottlieb-ResponsefromLLNL75FR720363-23-09.pdf Ltr.toGottlieb-ResponsefromLLNL75FR720363-23-0...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "llnl livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

LLNL-TR-479947, rev. 1 POINT 2011: ENDF/B-VII.1 Beta3  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

LLNL-TR-479947, rev. 1 POINT 2011: ENDF/B-VII.1 Beta3 Temperature Dependent Cross Section Library Technical Information Department's Digital Library http://www.llnl.gov/tid/Library.html #12;LLNL-TR-479947

Cullen, Red

382

New LLNL research shows the moon's core was active later than...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

013moon 05102013 New LLNL research shows the moon's core was active later than original estimates Anne M Stark, LLNL, (925) 422-9799, stark8@llnl.gov Printer-friendly East limb...

383

Initial ultraviolet-B intensity data at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

A measurement of UV-B reaching the ground has been established at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The instrument is the same as those operated by the National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research in their network in New Zealand. The wavelength response of the radiometer is similar to the response of human skin to UV-B. Intensity data are collected by averaging meter readings over 10 minutes from 6:00 am to 6:00 pm Pacific Standard Time, then converting to effective UV-B intensity normalized at 310 nm. This report checks the intensities obtained at LLNL from November 1992 to July 1993 against the expected results: Increased solar zenith angle, whether from the daily cycle or from the yearly cycle in solar position, should decrease UV-B intensity at the ground due to increased optical path; and, intervening cloud cover should decrease ground UV-B intensity. Three additional findings are reported here: Maximum UV-B intensity on cloudless days does not always follow a smooth curve, but instead varies either high or low to some extent; Morning UV-B intensities are less than those in the afternoon at comparable solar zenith angles at certain times of year; LLNL wintertime daily-averaged UV-B intensities are somewhat higher than those observed at Auckland, New Zealand in their winter of 1992.

Patten, K.O. Jr.; Wuebbles, D.J. [Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (United States); Smith, G.J. [New Zealand Inst. for Industrial Research and Development, Lower Hutt (New Zealand)

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

384

Physical and chemical sensor technologies developed at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The increasing emphasis on envirorunental issues, waste reduction, and improved efficiency for industrial processes has mandated the development of new chemical and physical sensors for field or in-plant use. The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) has developed a number of technologies for sensing physical and chemical properties. Table 1 gives some examples of several sensors. that have been developed recently for environmental, industrial, commercial or government applications. Physical sensors of pressure, temperature, acceleration, acoustic vibration spectra, and ionizing radiation have been developed. Sensors developed at LLNL for chemical species include inorganic solvents, heavy metal ions`, and gaseous atoms and compounds. Primary sensing technologies we have employed have been based on optical fibers, semiconductor optical or radiation detectors, electrochemical activity, micromachined electromechanical (MEMs) structures, or chemical separation technologies. The complexities of these sensor systems range from single detectors to more advanced micro-instruments on-a-chip. For many of the sensors we have developed the necessary intelligent electronic support systems for both local and remote sensing applications. Each of these sensor technologies are briefly described in the remaining sections of this paper.

Balch, J.W.; Ciarlo, D.; Folta, J.; Glass, R.; Hagans, K.; Milanovich, F.; Sheem, S.

1993-08-10T23:59:59.000Z

385

Analysis Activities at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Laboratory / Energy Security and Technology Program Jeffrey Stewart Group Leader: Applied Statistics and Economics DOE Hydrogen, Fuel Cells, and Infrastructure Technologies Program Systems Analysis Workshop July 28-29, 2004 Washington, D.C. 2 Charter * LLNL's mission is to provide research in the areas of national and homeland security and other important areas to DOE such as Energy,Climate and Water * To conduct systems and economic modeling and analysis to determine the technical and economic characteristics of individual technologies within systems to achieve policy objectives * DOE NETL, NE,Policy,HEU; Japanese Govt, CEC, Internal 3 History * LLNL has had a systems analysis group for over 25 years supporting national security, defense, energy and environment programs

386

LLNL-TR-411072 A Predictive Model  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

072 072 A Predictive Model of Fragmentation using Adaptive Mesh Refinement and a Hierarchical Material Model A. E. Koniges, N. D. Masters, A. C. Fisher, R. W. Anderson, D. C. Eder, D. Benson, T. B. Kaiser, B. T. Gunney, P. Wang, B. R. Maddox, J. F. Hansen, D. H. Kalantar, P. Dixit, H. Jarmakani, M. A. Meyers March 5, 2009 -2- Disclaimer This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, nor any of their employees makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.

387

Calibration of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Passive-Active Neutron Drum Shuffler for Measurement of Highly Enriched Uranium Oxide  

SciTech Connect

In partial response to a Department of Energy (DOE) request to evaluate the state of measurements of special nuclear material, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) evaluated and classified all highly enriched uranium (HEU) oxide items in its inventory. Because of a lack of traceable HEU standards, no items were deemed to fit the category of well measured. A subsequent DOE-HQ sponsored survey by New Brunswick Laboratory resulted in their preparation of certified reference material (CRM) 149 [Uranium (93% Enriched) Oxide-U{sub 3}O{sub 8} Standard for Neutron Counting Measurements], a unit of which was delivered to LLNL in October of 1999. This paper describes the approach to calibration of the LLNL passive-active neutron drum (PAN) shuffler for measurement of poorly measured/unmeasured HEU oxide inventory. Included are discussions of (1) the calibration effort, including the development of the mass calibration curve; (2) the results from an axial and radial mapping of the detector response over a wide region of the PAN shuffler counting chamber, and (3) an error model for the total (systematic + random) uncertainty in the predicted mass that includes the uncertainties in calibration and sample position.

Mount, M.; Glosup, J.; Cochran, C.; Dearborn, D.; Endres, E.

2000-06-16T23:59:59.000Z

388

Workforce Statistics - Livermore Field Office | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Livermore Field Office | National Nuclear Security Livermore Field Office | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Workforce Statistics - Livermore Field Office Home > About Us > Our Operations > Management and Budget > Office of Civil Rights > Workforce Statistics > Workforce Statistics - Livermore Field Office Workforce Statistics - Livermore Field Office

389

Sandia National Laboratories: Locations: Livermore, California: Visiting  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

California California Livermore, California administration building Our location and hours of operation Sandia/California is located at 7011 East Avenue in Livermore, Calif., a suburban community about 45 miles east of San Francisco. Positioned at the eastern edge of the San Francisco Bay Area, Sandia is within easy commuting distance of many affordable housing communities in San Joaquin County and the Central Valley. The official hours of operation at Sandia/California are from 7:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. PST, Monday through Friday. General inquiries can be made by calling (925) 294-3000. See our contacts page for additional information. Getting here All three major airports in the San Francisco Bay Area provide access to Sandia/California. Oakland International Airport is the closest airport to

390

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Use of Time and Materials Subcontracts  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Use of Time and Materials Subcontracts OAS-M-13-06 August 2013 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 August 8, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, LIVERMORE FIELD OFFICE FROM: George W. Collard Assistant Inspector General for Audits Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Use of Time and Materials Subcontracts" BACKGROUND The mission of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore) is to strengthen the United States' security through development and application of science and technology to enhance the Nation's defense, reduce the global threat from terrorism and weapons of mass destruction, and respond to scientific issues of national importance. Livermore is operated by Lawrence

391

Welcome to the Livermore Field Office | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Livermore Field Office | National Nuclear Security Livermore Field Office | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog The National Nuclear Security Administration Welcome to the Livermore Field Office Home > Field Offices > Welcome to the Livermore Field Office Welcome to the Livermore Field Office The NNSA Livermore Field Office (LFO) is located at the Lawrence Livermore

392

Geothermal programs at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has a number of geothermal programs supported through two offices in the Department of Energy: the Office of Renewable Technologies, Geothermal Technologies Division, and the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Engineering, Mathematics and Geosciences. Within these programs, we are carrying out research in injection monitoring, optical instrumentation for geothermal wells, seismic imaging methods, geophysical and drilling investigations of young volcanic systems in California, and fundamental studies of the rock and mineral properties.

Kasameyer, P.W.; Younker, L.W.

1987-07-10T23:59:59.000Z

393

LLNL Conducts First Plutonium Shot Using the JASPER Gas Gun | National  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Conducts First Plutonium Shot Using the JASPER Gas Gun | National Conducts First Plutonium Shot Using the JASPER Gas Gun | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Our History > NNSA Timeline > LLNL Conducts First Plutonium Shot Using the ... LLNL Conducts First Plutonium Shot Using the JASPER Gas Gun July 08, 2003 Nevada Test Site, NV

394

Photoelectron Spectroscopy of U Oxide at LLNL  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In our laboratory at LLNL, an effort is underway to investigate the underlying complexity of 5f electronic structure with spin-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy using chiral photonic excitation, i.e. Fano Spectroscopy. Our previous Fano measurements with Ce indicate the efficacy of this approach and theoretical calculations and spectral simulations suggest that Fano Spectroscopy may resolve the controversy concerning Pu electronic structure and electron correlation. To this end, we have constructed and commissioned a new Fano Spectrometer, testing it with the relativistic 5d system Pt. Here, our preliminary photoelectron spectra of the UO{sub 2} system are presented. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy has been used to characterize a sample of UO{sub 2} grown on an underlying substrate of Uranium. Both AlK{alpha} (1487 eV) and MgK{alpha} (1254 eV) emission were utilized as the excitation. Using XPS and comparing to reference spectra, it has been shown that our sample is clearly UO{sub 2}.

Tobin, J G; Yu, S; Chung, B W; Waddill, G D

2010-03-02T23:59:59.000Z

395

Livermore celebrates 60th Anniversary | National Nuclear Security...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

is not just the past 60 years, but the future of this Laboratory." Science & Technology Day highlighted LLNL's record of innovation with featured speakers and panel...

396

Lawrence Livermore's Vulcan brings 5 petaflops computing power...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

raises the amount of computing at LLNL available for external collaborations by an order of magnitude. "High performance computing is a key to accelerating the technological...

397

3D Stereo Viewer - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Director search process gets under way. November 26, 2013. Employee selected as Face of Stroke ambassador. November 26, 2013. LLNL Home. Latest News ...

398

LANL, LLNL researchers among Early Career Research Program award recipients  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

LANL, LLNL researchers among Early Career Research Program award recipients LANL, LLNL researchers among Early Career Research Program award recipients | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > NNSA Blog > LANL, LLNL researchers among Early Career Research ... LANL, LLNL researchers among Early Career Research Program award recipients Posted By Office of Public Affairs

399

LLNL's High Performance Computing Innovation Center marks second...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Open Campus. Read more about the center: 1.usa.gov12um9FP About the photo: A team of LLNL scientists, in partnership with engineers from Navistar, NASA, the U.S. Air Force and...

400

Allocation of Direct and Indirect Costs … Cost Accounting Standard 418 … at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, OAS-L-13-07  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Allocation of Direct and Indirect Allocation of Direct and Indirect Costs - Cost Accounting Standard 418 - at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory OAS-L-13-07 April 2013 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 April 11, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, LIVERMORE SITE OFFICE FROM: Rickey R. Hass Deputy Inspector General for Audits and Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on the "Allocation of Direct and Indirect Costs - Cost Accounting Standard 418 - at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory" BACKGROUND The attached report presents the results of the audit of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (Livermore) Allocation of Direct and Indirect Costs - Cost Accounting Standard 418, conducted to address the performance audit objective described below. The Office of

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "llnl livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Federal Facility Agreement, June 29, 1992 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site 300) Site 300) Agreement Name Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Federal Facility Agreement Under CERCLA Section 120, June 29, 1992 State California Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, implementing, and monitoring appropriate response actions at the Site Parties DOE; USEPA; California Department of Toxic Substances Control; Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board Date 6/29/1992 SCOPE * Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, implementing, and monitoring appropriate response actions at the Site. * Identify operable units (OUs) which are appropriate at the Site prior to the implementation of final remedial action(s).

402

EPA Notice of Availability of the Site-wide Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Stockpile Stewardship and Management, Implementation (DOE/EIS-0348/DOE/EIS-0236-S3)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

08 08 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 82 / Friday, April 29, 2005 / Notices beneficial uses of dredged materials (i.e., wetlands restoration in Dorchester County, MD). EPA expressed environmental concerns over the remaining three alternatives (i.e., the proposed multiple new Confined Disposal Facilities in the Patapsco River, the Poplar Island Environmental Restoration Project expansion and the Large Island Restoration Middle Bay). EPA recommended that continued use of Open Water Placement in Virginia include the already designated NorfolkOcean Disposal Site given its available capacity. Rating EC1 EIS No. 20050053, ERP No. D-CGD- E03013-00, Compass Port and Deepwater Port License Application, To Construct a Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Receiving, Storage and

403

Fossil Fuel Emission Verification Modeling at LLNL  

SciTech Connect

We have an established project at LLNL to develop the tools needed to constrain fossil fuel carbon dioxide emissions using measurements of the carbon-14 isotope in atmospheric samples. In Figure 1 we show the fossil fuel plumes from Los Angeles and San Francisco for two different weather patterns. Obviously, a measurement made at any given location is going to depend on the weather leading up to the measurement. Thus, in order to determine the GHG emissions from some region using in situ measurements of those GHGs, we use state-of-the-art global and regional atmospheric chemistry-transport codes to simulate the plumes: the LLNL-IMPACT model (Rotman et al., 2004) and the WRFCHEM community code (http://www.wrf-model.org/index.php). Both codes can use observed (aka assimilated) meteorology in order to recreate the actual transport that occurred. The measured concentration of each tracer at a particular spatio-temporal location is a linear combination of the plumes from each region at that location (for non-reactive species). The challenge is to calculate the emission strengths for each region that fit the observed concentrations. In general this is difficult because there are errors in the measurements and modeling of the plumes. We solve this inversion problem using the strategy illustrated in Figure 2. The Bayesian Inference step combines the a priori estimates of the emissions, and their uncertainty, for each region with the results of the observations, and their uncertainty, and an ensemble of model predicted plumes for each region, and their uncertainty. The result is the mathematical best estimate of the emissions and their errors. In the case of non-linearities, or if we are using a statistical sampling technique such as a Markov Chain Monte Carlo technique, then the process is iterated until it converges (ie reaches stationarity). For the Bayesian inference we can use both a direct inversion capability, which is fast but requires assumptions of linearity and Gaussianity of errors, or one of several statistical sampling techniques, which are computationally slower but do not require either linearity or Gaussianity (Chow, et al., 2008; Delle Monache, et al., 2008). The emission regions we are using are based on the air-basins defined by the California Air Resources Board (CARB), see Figure 3. The only difference is that we have joined some of the smaller air basins together. The results of a test using 4 days of simulated observations using our ensemble retrieval system are shown in Figure 3 (right). The main source of the variation between the different model configurations arises from the uncertainty in the atmospheric boundary layer parameterization in the WRF model. We are currently developing a capability to constrain the boundary layer height in our carbon-14 work either by weighting the ensemble member results by the accuracy of their boundary layer height (using commercial aircraft observations), or as part of the retrieval process using an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) capability.

Cameron-Smith, P; Kosovic, B; Guilderson, T; Monache, L D; Bergmann, D

2009-08-06T23:59:59.000Z

404

DOE Site HSPD-12 Card Issuance Performance Measures 10-8-10...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

& NR Sub-Total Service Center (Includes NNSA Site Office Populations) Y-12 Site Kansas City Plant Honeywell Kirtland Pantex Plant Nevada Test Site Lawrence Livermore National...

405

Livermore Field Office Public Affairs | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Livermore Field Office Public Affairs | National Nuclear Security Livermore Field Office Public Affairs | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Livermore Field Office Public Affairs Home > Field Offices > Welcome to the Livermore Field Office > Livermore Field Office Public Affairs Livermore Field Office Public Affairs The LFO Office of Public Affairs is the primary point of contact between

406

Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Health Services...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and Health Administration SQUIRM Super Quality Improvement and Risk Management 1 OFFICE OF OVERSIGHT REVIEW OF THE LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORIES HEALTH SERVICES...

407

FY 2010 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2010 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project...

408

FY 2011 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2011 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project...

409

FY 2008 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2008 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project...

410

FY 2009 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2009 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project...

411

Independent Oversight Review of the Lawrence Livermore National...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- March 2001 March 2001 Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Health Services Department The Office of Environment, Safety, and Health (ES&H) Oversight...

412

No-thermal plasma processing of VOCs and NO{sub x} at LLNL  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

For the past few years, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has been conducting a comprehensive research program on the application of non-thermal plasmas for air pollution control and abatement. This program combines an extensive modeling effort with an experimental facility and test program. We believe that there are two major issues to be addressed in order to apply non-thermal plasma processing to air pollution control; these are electrical energy consumption and byproduct identification. The thrust of our work has been to understand the scalability of the non-thermal process by focusing on the energy efficiency of the non-thermal process and to identify the byproducts to ensure that effluent gases from a non-thermal processor are benign. We have compared different types of electrical discharge reactors both theoretically and experimentally. Our interests in the application of non-thermal plasmas vary from the destruction of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) to NO{sub x} reduction for mobile applications. This paper will discuss the processing of both NO{sub x} and VOCs by non-thermal plasmas at LLNL.

Merritt, B.T.; Hsiao, M.C.; Penetrante, B.M.; Vogtlin, G.E.; Wallman, P.H.

1995-02-15T23:59:59.000Z

413

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 2007 Annual Report  

SciTech Connect

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's many outstanding accomplishments in 2007 are a tribute to a dedicated staff, which is shaping the Laboratory's future as we go through a period of transition and transformation. The achievements highlighted in this annual report illustrate our focus on the important problems that affect our nation's security and global stability, our application of breakthrough science and technology to tackle those problems, and our commitment to safe, secure, and efficient operations. In May 2007, the Department of Energy (DOE) awarded Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS), a new public-private partnership, the contract to manage and operate the Laboratory starting in October. Since its inception in 1952, the Laboratory had been managed by the University of California (UC) for the DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) and predecessor organizations. UC is one of the parent organizations that make up LLNS, and UC's presence in the new management entity will help us carry forward our strong tradition of multidisciplinary science and technology. 'Team science' applied to big problems was pioneered by the Laboratory's co-founder and namesake, Ernest O. Lawrence, and has been our hallmark ever since. Transition began fully a year before DOE's announcement. More than 1,600 activities had to be carried out to transition the Laboratory from management by a not-for-profit to a private entity. People, property, and procedures as well as contracts, formal agreements, and liabilities had to be transferred to LLNS. The pre-transition and transition teams did a superb job, and I thank them for their hard work. Transformation is an ongoing process at Livermore. We continually reinvent ourselves as we seek breakthroughs that impact emerging national needs. An example is our development in the late 1990s of a portable instrument that could rapidly detect DNA signatures, research that started with a view toward the potential threat of terrorist use of biological weapons. As featured in our annual report, activities in this area have grown to many important projects contributing to homeland security and disease prevention and control. At times transformation happens in large steps. Such was the case when nuclear testing stopped in the early 1990s. As one of the nation's nuclear weapon design laboratories, Livermore embarked on the Stockpile Stewardship Program. The objectives are to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the nation's nuclear weapons stockpile and to develop a science-based, thorough understanding of the performance of nuclear weapons. The ultimate goal is to sustain confidence in an aging stockpile without nuclear testing. Now is another time of major change for the Laboratory as the nation is resizing its nuclear deterrent and NNSA begins taking steps to transform the nuclear weapons complex to meet 21st-century national security needs. As you will notice in the opening commentary to each section of this report, the Laboratory's senior management team is a mixture of new and familiar faces. LLNS drew the best talent from its parent organizations--Bechtel National, UC, Babcock & Wilcox, the Washington Group Division of URS, and Battelle--to lead the Laboratory. We are honored to take on the responsibility and see a future with great opportunities for Livermore to apply its exceptional science and technology to important national problems. We will work with NNSA to build on the successful Stockpile Stewardship Program and transform the nation's nuclear weapons complex to become smaller, safer, more secure, and more cost effective. Our annual report highlights progress in many relevant areas. Laboratory scientists are using astonishing computational capabilities--including BlueGene/L, the world's fastest supercomputer with a revolutionary architecture and over 200,000 processors--to gain key insights about performance of aging nuclear weapons. What we learn will help us sustain the stockpile without nuclear testing. Preparations are underway to start experiments at

Chrzanowski, P; Walter, K

2008-04-25T23:59:59.000Z

414

Underground Test Area Fiscal Year 2012 Annual Quality Assurance Report Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

This report is mandated by the Underground Test Area (UGTA) Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) and identifies the UGTA quality assurance (QA) activities for fiscal year (FY) 2012. All UGTA organizationsU.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO); Desert Research Institute (DRI); Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL); Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL); Navarro-Intera, LLC (N-I); National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec); and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)conducted QA activities in FY 2012. The activities included conducting assessments, identifying findings and completing corrective actions, evaluating laboratory performance, revising the QAPP, and publishing documents. In addition, processes and procedures were developed to address deficiencies identified in the FY 2011 QAPP gap analysis.

Farnham, Irene; Marutzky, Sam

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

415

Calibration of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Passive-Active Neutron Drum Shuffler for Measurement of Highly Enriched Uranium in Mixed Oxide  

SciTech Connect

As a follow-on to the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) effort to calibrate the LLNL passive-active neutron drum (PAN) shuffler for measurement of highly enriched uranium (HEU) oxide, a method has been developed to extend the use of the PAN shuffler to the measurement of HEU in mixed uranium-plutonium (U-Pu) oxide. This method uses the current LLNL HEU oxide calibration algorithms, appropriately corrected for the mixed U-Pu oxide assay time, and recently developed PuO{sub 2} calibration algorithms to yield the mass of {sup 235}U present via differences between the expected count rate for the PuO{sub 2} and the measured count rate of the mixed U-Pu oxide. This paper describes the LLNL effort to use PAN shuffler measurements of units of certified reference material (CRM) 149 [uranium (93% Enriched) Oxide - U{sub 3}O{sub 8} Standard for Neutron Counting Measurements] and CRM 146 [Uranium Isotopic Standard for Gamma Spectrometry Measurements] and a selected set of LLNL PuO{sub 2}-bearing containers in consort with Monte Carlo simulations of the PAN shuffler response to each to (1) establish and validate a correction to the HEU calibration algorithm for the mixed U-Pu oxide assay time, (2) develop a PuO{sub 2} calibration algorithm that includes the effect of PuO{sub 2} density (2.4 g/cm{sup 3} to 4.8 g/cm{sup 3}) and container size (8.57 cm to 9.88 cm inside diameter and 9.60 cm to 13.29 cm inside height) on the PAN shuffler response, and (3) develop and validate the method for establishing the mass of {sup 235}U present in an unknown of mixed U-Pu oxide.

Mount, M; O' Connell, W; Cochran, C; Rinard, P; Dearborn, D; Endres, E

2002-05-23T23:59:59.000Z

416

Development of a Novel Depleted Uranium Treatment Process at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A three-stage process was developed at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory to treat potentially pyrophoric depleted uranium metal wastes. The three-stage process includes waste sorting/rinsing, acid dissolution of the waste metal with a hydrochloric and phosphoric acid solution, and solidification of the neutralized residuals from the second stage with clay. The final product is a solid waste form that can be transported to and disposed of at a permitted low-level radioactive waste disposal site.

Gates-Anderson, D; Bowers, J; Laue, C; Fitch, T

2007-01-22T23:59:59.000Z

417

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Livermore Field  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Livermore Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Livermore Field Office Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Livermore Field Office The purpose of the Livermore Field Office (LFO) Teclmical Qualification Program (TQP) is to ensure that federal teclmical personnel with safety oversight responsibilities at defense nuclear facilities at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory possess competence commensurate with responsibilities. LFO is committed to ensuring it has the necessary teclmical capabilities to provide the kind of management, direction, and guidance essential to safe operation ofDOE's defense nuclear facilities. LFO TQP Self-Assessment, May 2013 More Documents & Publications Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Pacific Northwest

418

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: News Center Distribution  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

News > News > News Center > Receive News Releases Receive News Releases Journalists: To receive information about activities at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, please complete the form below. The form may also be used to submit changes in your contact information or to remove yourself from the list. If you have any questions, please contact Media Relations at (925) 422-4599 or send an e-mail message to Kirsten Sprott. Type of Request: New Addition to News Media List Change Information Delete Information Your Name Title E-Mail Address Preferred E-Mail Address Direct Business Phone Number (with area code) Business Fax Number (with area code) News Organization Street Address City State Country Zip Code f815eee8931dfda40651bfb5302ac9a7 1389471929 Type of News Services You Use:

419

Livermore Regional Air Quality model (LIRAQ-1)  

SciTech Connect

The Livermore Regional Air Quality (LIRAQ) model is an Eulerian grid model developed for use in assessing the regional air quality of a region with temporally and spatially varying meteorology in complex terrain. The first implementation of this approach is embodied in the LIRAQ-1 model and is intended for use with either simple chemical systems or relatively inert pollutants. The basic model formulation is based on the conservation of mass equation integrated vertically from the surface to the base of an inversion layer, thereby creating a single layer model with a grid structure established in the two horizontal dimensions. Surface pollutant concentrations are related to vertical average concentrations using a logarithmic profile. Atmospheric transport, inversion height, source emissions, and topography are all prescribed. Data for the San Francisco Bay Area obtained during 1973 have been used in validation studies. (auth)

MacCracken, M.C.; Grant, K.E.

1975-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

420

Dr. Yuan Ping Lawrence Livermore National Lab  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Creating, diagnosing and Creating, diagnosing and controlling high-energy- density matter with lasers Dr. Yuan Ping Lawrence Livermore National Lab Tuesday, Oct 22, 2013 - 3:00PM MBG AUDITORIUM Refreshments at 2:45PM The PrinceTon Plasma Physics laboraTory is a U.s. DeParTmenT of energy faciliTy Since their invention in 1960's, lasers with power spanning from Kilo- Watt to PetaWatt have been widely used in almost every branch of sci- ence, leading to numerous discoveries and novel techniques. At present, lasers are capable of creating extreme states of matter in a laboratory, at conditions resembling those most extreme in the Universe: they heat matter up to the temperatures inside stars, they create electric field and

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "llnl livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

DOECGF 2009 Site Report: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Data group provides data analysis and visualization support to its customers. This consists primarily of the development and support of VisIt, a data analysis and visualization tool. Support ranges from answering questions about the tool, providing classes on how to use the tool, and performing data analysis and visualization for customers. The Information Management and Graphics Group supports and develops tools that enhance our ability to access, display, and understand large, complex data sets. Activities include applying visualization software for terascale data exploration; running video production labs on two networks; supporting graphics libraries and tools for end users; maintaining PowerWalls and assorted other displays; and developing software for searching, managing, and browsing scientific data. Researchers in the Center for Applied Scientific Computing (CASC) work on various projects including the development of visualization techniques for terascale data exploration that are funded by the ASC program, among others. The researchers also have LDRD projects and collaborations with other lab researchers, academia, and industry.

Brugger, E; Springmeyer, R R

2009-04-17T23:59:59.000Z

422

Lawrence Livermore Site Office Safety Basis Self-Assessment Final...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

are anticipated, so this authority is not currently needed. The LSO Integrated Safety Management System Description and Environment, Safety and Health Functions,...

423

Lawrence Livermore Site Office Safety Basis Self-Assessment Final...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

(for facility modifications or at LSO's direction), and potential inadequacy of the safety analysis (PISA) submittals. The process for DSA and TSR reviews is detailed and...

424

J.G. Tobin and S.-W. Yu Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Differentiation of 5f and 6d Components Differentiation of 5f and 6d Components in the Unoccupied Electronic Structure of UO 2 J.G. Tobin and S.-W. Yu Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA Summary: One of the crucial questions of all actinide electronic structure determinations is the issue of 5f versus 6d character and the distribution of these components across the density of states. Here, two break-though experiments will be discussed, which have allowed the direct determination of the U5f and U6d contributions to the unoccupied density of states (UDOS) in Uranium Dioxide (UO 2 ). [1] First, a combined soft X-ray Absorption and Bremstrahlung Isochromat Spectroscopy (XAS and BIS, respectively) study of UO 2 will be discussed. [2] Second, a novel Resonant Inverse Photoelectron and X-ray Emission Spectroscopy (RIPES and

425

Impact of Recent Constraints on Intellectual Freedom on Science and Technology at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) was created in 1952 to meet the nation's need for an expanded nuclear weapons research and development (R&D) capability. LLNL quickly grew to become a full-fledged nuclear weapons design laboratory with a broad range of technical capabilities similar to those of our sister laboratory--Los Alamos--with which we shared mission responsibilities. By its very nature, nuclear weapons R&D requires some of the most advanced science and technology (S&T). Accordingly, there is an obvious need for careful attention to ensure that appropriate security measures exist to deal with the sensitive aspects of nuclear weapons development. The trade-off between advancing S&T at the Laboratory and the need for security is a complex issue that has always been with us, As Edward Teller noted in a recent commentary in a May, 1999 editorial in the New York Times: ''The reaction of President Harry Truman to the leaking of information is well known. He imposed no additional measures for security. Instead, we have clear knowledge that the disclosures by (Klaus) Fuchs caused Truman to call for accelerated work on all aspects of nuclear weapons. The right prescription for safety is not reaction to dangers that are arising, but rather action leading to more knowledge and, one hopes, toward positive interaction between nations.'' To explore the issue of intellectual freedom at a national security laboratory such as LLNL, one must understand the type of activities we pursue and how our research portfolio has evolved since the Laboratory was established. Our mission affects the workforce skills, capabilities, and security measures that the Laboratory requires. The national security needs of the US have evolved, along with the S&T community in which the Laboratory resides and to which it contributes. These factors give rise to a greater need for the Laboratory to interact with universities, industry, and other national laboratories. Intellectual freedom at the Laboratory and constraints on it can be understood only within the context of our mission, our necessary interactions with other entities; and our need for an exceptional multidisciplinary workforce.

Wadsworth, J

2000-11-12T23:59:59.000Z

426

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory interests and capabilities for research on the ecological effects of global climatic and atmospheric change  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) has interests and capabilities in all three types of research that must be conducted in order to understand and predict effects of global atmospheric and climatic (i.e., environmental) changes on ecological systems and their functions (ecosystem function is perhaps most conveniently defined as mass and energy exchange and storage). These three types of research are: (1) manipulative experiments with plants and ecosystems; (2) monitoring of present ecosystem, landscape, and global exchanges and pools of energy, elements, and compounds that play important roles in ecosystem function or the physical climate system, and (3) mechanistic (i.e., hierarchic and explanatory) modeling of plant and ecosystem responses to global environmental change. Specific experimental programs, monitoring plans, and modeling activities related to evaluation of ecological effects of global environmental change that are of interest to, and that can be carried out by LLNL scientists are outlined. Several projects have the distinction of integrating modeling with empirical studies resulting in an Integrated Product (a model or set of models) that DOE or any federal policy maker could use to assess ecological effects. The authors note that any scheme for evaluating ecological effects of atmospheric and climatic change should take into account exceptional or sensitive species, in particular, rare, threatened, or endangered species.

Amthor, J.S.; Houpis, J.L.; Kercher, J.R.; Ledebuhr, A.; Miller, N.L.; Penner, J.E.; Robison, W.L.; Taylor, K.E.

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

427

Available Technologies - Industrial Partnerships Office  

City of Livermore. Community. Our Community. Discovery Center. Site Tours. LLNL Community News. ... LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nucle ...

428

DNA Tagged Reagents for Aerosol Experiments (DNATrax)  

City of Livermore. Community. Our Community. Discovery Center. Site Tours. LLNL Community News. ... LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nucle ...

429

Technologies  

City of Livermore. Community. Our Community. Discovery Center. Site Tours. LLNL Community News. ... LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nucle ...

430

News  

City of Livermore. Community. Our Community. Discovery Center. Site Tours. LLNL Community News. ... LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nucle ...

431

CISR Convergent Polishing - Single Interation, Initial ...  

City of Livermore. Community. Our Community. Discovery Center. Site Tours. LLNL Community News. ... LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nucle ...

432

Nondisclosure Agreement (NDA) - Industrial Partnerships Office  

City of Livermore. Community. Our Community. Discovery Center. Site Tours. LLNL Community News. ... LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nucle ...

433

Partnering Highlights  

City of Livermore. Community. Our Community. Discovery Center. Site Tours. LLNL Community News. ... LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nucle ...

434

Awards and Patents - Industrial Partnerships Office  

City of Livermore. Community. Our Community. Discovery Center. Site Tours. LLNL Community News. ... LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nucle ...

435

Adaptive Optics-Based Optical Coherence Tomography  

City of Livermore. Community. Our Community. Discovery Center. Site Tours. LLNL Community News. ... LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nucle ...

436

Tech Transfer - Industrial Partnerships Office  

City of Livermore. Community. Our Community. Discovery Center. Site Tours. LLNL Community News. ... LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nucle ...

437

Ultrasonic Drug Delivery - Industrial Partnerships Office  

City of Livermore. Community. Our Community. Discovery Center. Site Tours. LLNL Community News. ... LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nucle ...

438

Search - Industrial Partnerships Office  

City of Livermore. Community. Our Community. Discovery Center. Site Tours. LLNL Community News. ... LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nucle ...

439

Software  

City of Livermore. Community. Our Community. Discovery Center. Site Tours. LLNL Community News. ... LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nucle ...

440

Patents  

City of Livermore. Community. Our Community. Discovery Center. Site Tours. LLNL Community News. ... LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nucle ...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "llnl livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

For Students - Industrial Partnerships Office  

City of Livermore. Community. Our Community. Discovery Center. Site Tours. LLNL Community News. ... LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nucle ...

442

Material Portfolio  

City of Livermore. Community. Our Community. Discovery Center. Site Tours. LLNL Community News. ... LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nucle ...

443

C0 Lens - Industrial Partnerships Office  

City of Livermore. Community. Our Community. Discovery Center. Site Tours. LLNL Community News. ... LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nucle ...

444

About IPO  

City of Livermore. Community. Our Community. Discovery Center. Site Tours. LLNL Community News. ... LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nucle ...

445

Entrepreneurs - Industrial Partnerships Office  

City of Livermore. Community. Our Community. Discovery Center. Site Tours. LLNL Community News. ... LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nucle ...

446

Industrial Partnerships Office  

Current Weather. Protocol Office. Where to stay. Tri-Valley Visitors Bureau. City of Livermore. Community. Our Community. Discovery Center. Site Tours. LLNL Community ...

447

SciTech Connect: "smart grid"  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States) Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States) Los Alamos Site Office, NM (United States) Morgantown...

448

EIS-0348: EPA Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statement Site-wide Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Stockpile Stewardship and Management, Implementation Alameda and San Joaquin...

449

Reservoir related research at Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, and Oak Ridge National Laboratory  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) conduct research in reservoir engineering, geophysics, and geochemistry, respectively, in support of the DOE Reservoir Technology Research Program. INEL's research has centered on the development of a reservoir simulation code to predict heat and solute transfer in fractured, porous media. In support of the initiatives for research at the The Geysers, INEL will initiate in cooperation with Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, studies of injection and related interference effects at The Geysers. Work at LLNL is centered on analysis of the seismicity associated with production and injection at geothermal systems and effects of geothermal systems on seismic signals. LLNL is continuing studies of seismic attenuation related to the presence of steam at The Geysers. ORNL conducts research to obtain the thermodynamic and kinetic data needed as input into geochemical models such as those being developed by John Weare of the University of California, San Diego that predict the phase behavior and corrosion characteristics of geothermal brines. The current program at ORNL addresses the ion interaction parameters of bisulfate ion (HSO{sup {minus}}) with H{sup +} and Na{sup +}, the dissociation constant of HSO{sub 4}{sup {minus}}, OH{sup {minus}}, and the solubility and specification of aluminum in the system H{sup +}-Na{sup +}-K{sup +}-Cl{sup {minus}}-OH{sup {minus}}. ORNL is initiating studies of the distribution of HCl in steam in support of the expanded research program at The Geysers. 3 refs.

Renner, J.L. (EG and G Idaho, Inc., Idaho Falls, ID (USA)); Kasameyer, P.W. (Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (USA)); Mesmer, R.E. (Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (USA))

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

450

Director of the National Ignition Facility, Lawrence Livermore...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

after working on a number of laser research projects at Hughes Aircraft and LLNL. He led the development of the Peregine radiation therapy planning tool for the treatment of...

451

Lawrence Livermore scientists make new discoveries in the transmission...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 For immediate release: 08122013 | NR-13-08-01 High Resolution Image From left: LLNL scientist Monica Borucki from the Lab's Biosciences and Biotechnology Division looks at cell...

452

2007 LLNL ES&H.indd  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WORK PLANNING AND CONTROL PROCESSES .............................9 WORK PLANNING AND CONTROL PROCESSES .............................9 4.2 ESSENTIAL SYSTEM FUNCTIONALITY..........................................14 4.3 FOCUS AREAS ......................................................................................17 4.4 FEEDBACK AND IMPROVEMENT SYSTEMS .................................18 5.0 CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................21 6.0 RATINGS .......................................................................................................23 APPENDIX A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ...........................................25 APPENDIX B - SITE-SPECIFIC FINDINGS .......................................................27 Abbreviations Used in This Report

453

LLNL-PRES-421079 NIF-1109-17901  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

LLNL-PRES-421079 #12;NIF-1109-17901 Lasers Moses, Fusion Power Associates 2 #12;NIF-1109-17901 NIF concentrates all 192 beam energy in a football stadium-sized fac. Moses, Fusion Power Associates 3 #12;NIF-1109-17901 Moses, Fusion Power Associates 4 NIF Missions #12;NIF-1109-17901 Moses, Fusion Power Associates 5 #12

454

Proceedings of the LLNL Technical Women`s Symposium  

SciTech Connect

This report documents events of the LLNL Technical Women`s Symposium. Topics include; future of computer systems, environmental technology, defense and space, Nova Inertial Confinement Fusion Target Physics, technical communication, tools and techniques for biology in the 1990s, automation and robotics, software applications, materials science, atomic vapor laser isotope separation, technical communication, technology transfer, and professional development workshops.

von Holtz, E. [ed.

1993-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

455

Microsoft Word - Buff Cover Report - LLNL Classified IT  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Security Planning for National Security Planning for National Security Information Systems at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory OAS-M-11-03 April 2011 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 April 15, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR THE ADMINISTRATOR, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM: Rickey R. Hass Deputy Inspector General for Audits and Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Security Planning for National Security Information Systems at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory" BACKGROUND The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) is responsible for the maintenance and security of the Nation's nuclear stockpile, management of nuclear nonproliferation activities, and operation of the naval reactor programs. A significant amount of the information related to these

456

Microsoft Word - Blue Cover Report - Beryllium Controls at LLNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Implementation of Beryllium Controls Implementation of Beryllium Controls at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory DOE/IG-0851 June 2011 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 June 17, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on the "Implementation of Beryllium Controls at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy has a long history of using beryllium - a metal essential for nuclear operations and other processes. Exposure to beryllium can cause beryllium sensitization or even Chronic Beryllium Disease, an often debilitating, and sometimes fatal, lung condition. In December 1999, the Department established a Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program

457

FY 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PEP | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

PEP | National Nuclear PEP | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PEP Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PEP FY 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PEP

458

Director of the National Ignition Facility, Lawrence Livermore National  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Director of the National Ignition Facility, Lawrence Livermore National Director of the National Ignition Facility, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Who We Are > In The Spotlight > Edward Moses Director of the National Ignition Facility, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

459

Retired lab physicist and computational pioneer, Lawrence Livermore  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Retired lab physicist and computational pioneer, Lawrence Livermore Retired lab physicist and computational pioneer, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Who We Are > In The Spotlight > Berni Alder Retired lab physicist and computational pioneer, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

460

Associate director for Physical and Life Sciences, Lawrence Livermore  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Associate director for Physical and Life Sciences, Lawrence Livermore Associate director for Physical and Life Sciences, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Who We Are > In The Spotlight > William Goldstein Associate director for Physical and Life Sciences, Lawrence Livermore

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "llnl livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Instrument calibration and measurement plan for the poorly measured/unmeasured category of highly enriched uranium at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

In partial response to a Department of Energy (DOE) request to evaluate the state of measurements of special nuclear material, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) evaluated and classified all highly enriched uranium (HEU) metal and oxide items in its inventory. Because of a lack of traceable HEU standards, no items were deemed to fit the category of well measured. A subsequent DOE-HQ sponsored survey by New Brunswick Laboratory resulted in their preparation of a set of certified reference material (CRM) standards for HEU oxide (U{sub 3}O{sub 8}) that are projected for delivery during September of 1999. However, CRM standards for HEU metal are neither in preparation nor are they expected to be prepared within the foreseeable future. Consequently, HEU metal working standards must be developed if the poorly measured/unmeasured portion of the LLNL inventory is to be reclassified. This paper describes the approach that LLNL will take to (1) develop a set of HEU metal working standards; (2) develop HEU metal and oxide calibration curves for the passive-active neutron (PAN) shuffler that are functions of mass, enrichment, size, and shape; and (3) reclassify the poorly measured/unmeasured inventory through direct measurement or reprocessing of previously archived data.

Glosup, J; Mount, M E

1999-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

462

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory underground coal gasification data base. [US DOE-supported field tests; data  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy has sponsored a number of field projects to determine the feasibility of converting the nation's vast coal reserves into a clean efficient energy source via underground coal gasification (UCG). Due to these tests, a significant data base of process information has developed covering a range of coal seams (flat subbituminous, deep flat bituminous and steeply dipping subbituminous) and processing techniques. A summary of all DOE-sponsored tests to data is shown. The development of UCG on a commercial scale requires involvement from both the public and private sectors. However, without detailed process information, accurate assessments of the commercial viability of UCG cannot be determined. To help overcome this problem the DOE has directed the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) to develop a UCG data base containing raw and reduced process data from all DOE-sponsored field tests. It is our intent to make the data base available upon request to interested parties, to help them assess the true potential of UCG.

Cena, R. J.; Thorsness, C. B.

1981-08-21T23:59:59.000Z

463

2005 LLNL EM Report.pmd  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 4.0 RATINGS ................................................................................................ 7 APPENDIX A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION .............................. 9 APPENDIX B - SITE-SPECIFIC FINDINGS ......................................... 10 APPENDIX C - HAZARDS SURVEY AND HAZARDS ASSESSMENTS ............................................................. 11 APPENDIX D - EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS ............................... 15 APPENDIX E - READINESS ASSURANCE ......................................... 27 Abbreviations Used in This Report CFR Code of Federal Regulations DOE U.S. Department of Energy EAL Emergency Action Level EOC Emergency Operations Center EPHA Emergency Planning Hazards Assessment EPI Emergency Public Information EPIP Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure

464

LLNL-JRNL-402318 Hyperfine quenching of the 2s2p 3  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

LLNL-JRNL-402318 Hyperfine quenching of the 2s2p 3 P0 state of berylliumlike ions K. T. Cheng, the measured value. PACS numbers: 31.30.Gs, 32.10.Fn, 31.15.aj, 31.15.am ktcheng@llnl.gov chen7@llnl

Johnson, Walter R.

465

Low-Level Plutonium Bioassay Measurements at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Plutonium-239 ({sup 239}Pu) and plutonium-240 ({sup 240}Pu) are important alpha emitting radionuclides contained in radioactive debris from nuclear weapons testing. {sup 239}Pu and {sup 240}Pu are long-lived radionuclides with half-lives of 24,400 years and 6580 years, respectively. Concerns over human exposure to plutonium stem from knowledge about the persistence of plutonium isotopes in the environment and the high relative effectiveness of alpha-radiation to cause potential harm to cells once incorporated into the human body. In vitro bioassay tests have been developed to assess uptakes of plutonium based on measured urinary excretion patterns and modeled metabolic behaviors of the absorbed radionuclides. Systemic plutonium absorbed by the deep lung or from the gastrointestinal tract after ingestion is either excreted or distributed to other organs, primarily to the liver and skeleton, where it is retained for biological half-times of around 20 and 50 years, respectively. Dose assessment and atoll rehabilitation programs in the Marshall Islands have historically given special consideration to residual concentrations of plutonium in the environment even though the predicted dose from inhalation and/or ingestion of plutonium accounts for less than 5% of the annual effective dose from exposure to fallout contamination. Scientists from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) have developed a state-of-the-art bioassay test to assess urinary excretion rates of plutonium from Marshallese populations. This new heavy-isotope measurement system is based on Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS). The AMS system at LLNL far exceeds the standard measurement requirements established under the latest United States Department of Energy (DOE) regulation, 10CFR 835, for occupational monitoring of plutonium, and offers several advantages over classical as well as competing new technologies for low-level detection and measurement of plutonium isotopes. The United States National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has independently verified the accuracy and precision of the AMS detection system for low-level bioassay measurements of plutonium isotopes through participation in an intercomparison exercise whereby performance evaluation samples were prepared in a synthetic urine matrix and submitted to participating laboratories for blind analysis. The results of the analyses were then sent to the NIST to independently evaluate the performance of laboratory participants. At LLNL, the AMS measurements of {sup 239}Pu and {sup 240}Pu met ANSI 13.30 criteria for both precision and accuracy at all sample test levels. Livermore scientists continue to test the performance of the Marshall Islands Plutonium Urinalysis Program by routine blind analysis of externally prepared quality control test samples, and through the rigorous implementation of standardized methods and procedures. Although not addressed directly in the report, AMS measurements show that the urinary excretion of plutonium by selected Marshallese populations fall into a low and reproducible range. Moreover, there appears to be no evidence of small incremental intakes of plutonium associated with resettlement activities - past or present. The improved quality, reliability and detection sensitivity of AMS for low-level plutonium isotope measurements will enable DOE to develop high-quality, baseline urinary excretion data for Marshallese populations, and accurately assess and track potential uptakes of plutonium. associated with resettlement activities and/or from long-term changes in plutonium exposure conditions in the Marshall Islands.

Hamilton, T; Brown, T; Hickman, D; Marchetti, A; Williams, R; Kehl, S

2007-06-18T23:59:59.000Z

466

FY 2009 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2009 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2009 Lawrence Livermore National Security,

467

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3-04 3-04 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2003-04 September 3, 2003 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to the University of California related to an Extremity Radiological Overexposure at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, (EA-2003-04) This letter refers to the recent investigation by the Department of Energy's Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) of the June 2002 extremity radiological overexposure event. Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2003-04 More Documents & Publications Preliminary Notice of Violation, University of California - EA-2006-01 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-98-06 Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health

468

Boralex Beaver Livermore Falls Biomass Facility | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Livermore Falls Biomass Facility Livermore Falls Biomass Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Boralex Beaver Livermore Falls Biomass Facility Facility Boralex Beaver Livermore Falls Sector Biomass Location Androscoggin County, Maine Coordinates 44.1912416°, -70.1707037° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":44.1912416,"lon":-70.1707037,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

469

Lawrence Livermore Laboratory PERFORMANCE TEST OF A BLADELESS...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lawrence Livermore Laboratory PERFORMANCE TEST OF A BLADELESS TURBINE FOR GF.OTHF.RMAT. APPLICATIONS R. Steidel and H. Weiss March 24, 1976 I j UCID-17068 This is an informal...

470

Lawrence Livermore charitable campaign raises $3.3 million for...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Lawrence Livermore raises 3.3 million for local organizations Posted on December 12, 2013 at 3:00 pm ET Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version Facebook Twitter...

471

LLNL demonstration of liquid gun propellant destruction in a 0.1 gallon per minute scale reactor  

SciTech Connect

The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) has built and operated a pilot plant for processing oil shale using recirculating hot solids. This pilot plant, was adapted in 1993 to demonstrate the feasibility of decomposing a liquid gun propellant (LGP), LP XM46, a mixture of 76% HAN (NH{sub 3}OHNO{sub 3}) and 24% TEAN (HOCH{sub 2}CH{sub 2}){sub 3} NHNO{sub 3} diluted 1:3 in water. In the Livermore process, the LPG is thermally treated in a moving packed bed of ceramic spheres, where TEAN and HAN decompose, forming a suite of gases including: methane, carbon monoxide, oxygen, nitrogen oxides, ammonia and molecular nitrogen. The ceramic spheres are circulated and heated, providing the energy required for thermal decomposition. The authors performed an extended one day (8 hour) test of the solids recirculation system, with continuous injection of approximately 0.1 gal/min of LGP, diluted 1:3 in water, for a period of eight hours. The apparatus operated smoothly over the course of the eight hour run during which 144 kg of solution was processed, containing 36 kg of LGP. Continuous on-line gas analysis was invaluable in tracking the progress of the experiment and quantifying the decomposition products. The reactor was operated in two modes, a {open_quotes}Pyrolysis{close_quotes} mode, where decomposition products were removed from the moving bed reactor exit, passing through condensers to a flare, and in a {open_quotes}Combustion{close_quotes} mode, where the products were oxidized in air lift pipe prior to exiting the system. In the {open_quotes}Pyrolysis{close_quotes} mode, driver gases were recycled producing a small, concentrated stream of decomposition products. In the {open_quotes}Combustion mode{close_quotes}, the driver gases were not recycled, resulting in 40 times higher gas flow rates and correspondingly lower concentrations of nitrogen bearing gases.

Cena, R.J.; Thorsness, C.B.; Coburn, T.T.; Watkins, B.E.

1994-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

472

Supplement Analysis of the 2005 Site-Wide EIS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Livermore Site Office Livermore, California SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS of the 2005 Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement For Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Volume I: Main Report AUGUST 2011 DOE/EIS-0348-SA-03 i CONTENTS NOTATION.............................................................................................................................. v SUMMARY...........................................................................................................................S-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose and Need............................................................................................

473

GAMA-LLNL Alpine Basin Special Study: Scope of Work  

SciTech Connect

For this task LLNL will examine the vulnerability of drinking water supplies in foothills and higher elevation areas to climate change impacts on recharge. Recharge locations and vulnerability will be determined through examination of groundwater ages and noble gas recharge temperatures in high elevation basins. LLNL will determine whether short residence times are common in one or more subalpine basin. LLNL will measure groundwater ages, recharge temperatures, hydrogen and oxygen isotopes, major anions and carbon isotope compositions on up to 60 samples from monitoring wells and production wells in these basins. In addition, a small number of carbon isotope analyses will be performed on surface water samples. The deliverable for this task will be a technical report that provides the measured data and an interpretation of the data from one or more subalpine basins. Data interpretation will: (1) Consider climate change impacts to recharge and its impact on water quality; (2) Determine primary recharge locations and their vulnerability to climate change; and (3) Delineate the most vulnerable areas and describe the likely impacts to recharge.

Singleton, M J; Visser, A; Esser, B K; Moran, J E

2011-12-12T23:59:59.000Z

474

2010 Dry and 2009 - 2010 Wet Season Branchiopod Survey Report, Site 300  

SciTech Connect

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) requested that Condor Country Consulting, Inc. (CCCI) perform wet season surveys and manage the dry season sampling for listed branchiopods in two ponded locations within the Site 300 Experimental Test Site. Site 300 is located in Alameda and San Joaquin Counties, located between the Cities of Livermore and Tracy. The two pool locations have been identified for possible amphibian enhancement activities in support of the Compensation Plan for impacts tied to the Building 850 soil clean-up project. The Building 850 project design resulted in formal consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) as an amendment (File 81420-2009-F-0235) to the site-wide Biological Opinion (BO) (File 1-1-02-F-0062) in the spring of 2009 and requires mitigation for the California tiger salamander (AMCA, Ambystoma californiense) and California red-legged frog (CRLF, Rana draytonii) habitat loss. Both pools contain breeding AMCA, but do not produce metamorphs due to limited hydroperiod. The pool to the southeast (Pool BC-FS-2) is the preferred site for amphibian enhancement activities, and the wetland to northwest (Pool OA-FS-1) is the alternate location for enhancement. However, prior to enhancement, LLNL has been directed by USFWS (BO Conservation Measure 17 iii) to 'conduct USFWS protocol-level branchiopod surveys to determine whether listed brachiopod species are present within the compensation area.' CCCI conducted surveys for listed branchiopods in the 2009-2010 wet season to determine the presence of federally-listed branchiopods at the two pools (previous surveys with negative findings were performed by CCCI in 2001-2002 and 2002-2003 onsite). Surveys were conducted to partially satisfy the survey requirements of the USFWS 'Interim Survey Guidelines to Permittees for Recovery Permits under Section 10(a)(1)(A) of the Endangered Species Act for the Listed Vernal Pool Branchiopods' ('Guidelines, USFWS 1996 and BO Conservation Measure 17 iii). The dry sampling (included as an Appendix D) followed the wet season surveys in the summer of 2010.

Dexter, W

2011-03-14T23:59:59.000Z

475

Field investigation at the Faultless Site Central Nevada Test Area  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

An evaluation of groundwater monitoring at non-Nevada Test Site underground nuclear test sites raised questions about the potential for radionuclide migration from the Faultless event and how to best monitor for such migration. With its long standing interest in the Faultless area and background in Nevada hydrogeology, the Desert Research Institute conducted a field investigation in FY92 to address the following issues: The status of chimney infilling (which determines the potential for migration); the best level(s) from which to collect samples from the nearby monitoring wells, HTH-1 and HTH-2; the status of hydraulic heads in the monitoring well area following records of sustained elevated post-shot heads. The field investigation was conducted from July 27 to 31 and August 4 to 7, 1992. Temperature and electrical conductivity logging were performed in HTH-1, HTH-2, and UC-1-P-2SR. Water samples were collected from HTH-1 and HTH-2. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) also collected samples during the July trip, including samples from UC-1-P-2SR. This report presents the data gathered during these field excursions and some preliminary conclusions. Full interpretation of the data in light of the issues listed above is planned for FY93.

Chapman, J.B.; Mihevc, T.M.; Lyles, B.

1992-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

476

LLNL input to FY94 hydrogen annual report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes the FY 1994 progress made in hydrogen research at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Research programs covered include: Technical and Economic Assessment of the Transport and Storage of Hydrogen; Research and Development of an Optimized Hydrogen-Fueled Internal Combustion Engine; Hydrogen Storage in Engineered Microspheres; Synthesis, Characterization and Modeling of Carbon Aerogels for Hydrogen Storage; Chemical Kinetic Modeling of H2 Applications; and, Municipal Solid Waste to Hydrogen.

Schock, R.N.; Smith, J.R.; Rambach, G.; Pekala, R.W.; Westbrook, C.K.; Richardson, J.H.

1994-12-16T23:59:59.000Z

477

Microsoft Word - S09IS004 _LLNL_PF_Authority_08262009a FINAL.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Inspections Inspection Report Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Protective Force Authority DOE/IG-0820 September 2009 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 4, 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Inspection Report on "Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Protective Force Authority" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy's (Department) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore) is a premier research and development institution supporting the Department's scientific, engineering, environmental, and national security activities. Livermore is

478

Microsoft Word - LLNL Property Final 052809a Insp # S08IS011.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Inspections Inspection Report Personal Property Management at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory INS-O-09-03 May 2009 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 May 28, 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR THE ADMINISTRATOR, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM: Elise M. Ennis Assistant Inspector General for Inspections SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Inspection Report on "Personal Property Management at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy's (DOE's) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore) is a premier research and development institution for science and technology supporting the core mission of national security. According to Livermore, as of

479

FY 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

PER Summary | National PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, ...

480

Non-Compliance Tracking and Trending at LLNL  

SciTech Connect

The Criticality Safety Section at LLNL has a formal set of procedures to guide the administrative and technical work of the section. Two of these procedures, ''Response to a Criticality Safety Infraction'' and ''CSG Criticality Safety Non-Compliance and Audit Tracking System,'' provide combined guidance for response, tracking, and trending for procedural non-compliances. Combined with a database, this system provides a framework to systematically respond to, document, track and trend criticality safety non-compliances, as well as audit findings.

Huang, S T; Pearson, J S

2001-08-22T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "llnl livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Feasibility Study: Potential Enhancements for the LLNL Renewables Website  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This feasibility study investigates additional improvements/extensions to the LLNL Renewables Website. Currently, the Renewables Website focuses on wind energy in California. Future enhancements will include other renewable energy sources. The extensions described below are focused along two separate yet related avenues: (1) Forecasting wildfire risk in the regions of California where new development may occur, as a part of the 'Million Solar Roofs' program. (2) Gaining a better understanding of the ecological components and potential of biofuels from forests in California. These two avenues are further described in the report. Following is a technical description of the Center for Fire Research and Outreach computing and web service capabilities.

Kearns, F; Krawchuk, M; Moritz, M; Stephens, S; Goldstein, N

2008-01-25T23:59:59.000Z

482

Basic Research for an Era of Nuclear Energy at LBNL, LLNL, AND...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Basic Research for an Era of Nuclear Energy at LBNL, LLNL, AND LANL Nuclear Physics (NP) NP Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of NP Spinoff Applications...

483

97 percent of special nuclear material de-inventoried from LLNL...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

97 percent of special nuclear material de-inventoried from LLNL | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the...