Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "lenox livermore maquoketa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Maquoketa Valley Rrl Elec Coop | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Maquoketa Valley Rrl Elec Coop Maquoketa Valley Rrl Elec Coop Jump to: navigation, search Name Maquoketa Valley Rrl Elec Coop Place Iowa Utility Id 12642 Utility Location Yes Ownership C NERC Location RFC NERC MRO Yes ISO MISO Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png No rate schedules available. Average Rates Residential: $0.1180/kWh Commercial: $0.1040/kWh References ↑ "EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a" Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Maquoketa_Valley_Rrl_Elec_Coop&oldid=411035" Categories:

2

Lenox Municipal Utilities Wind Farm | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Lenox Municipal Utilities Wind Farm Lenox Municipal Utilities Wind Farm Jump to: navigation, search Name Lenox Municipal Utilities Wind Farm Facility Lenox Municipal Utilities Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner Lenox Municipal Utilities Developer Lenox Municipal Utilities Energy Purchaser Lenox Municipal Utilities Location Lenox IA Coordinates 40.880592°, -94.559029° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":40.880592,"lon":-94.559029,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

3

City of Maquoketa, Iowa (Utility Company) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Maquoketa, Iowa (Utility Company) Maquoketa, Iowa (Utility Company) Jump to: navigation, search Name Maquoketa City of Place Iowa Utility Id 11611 Utility Location Yes Ownership M NERC Location MRO NERC MRO Yes ISO MISO Yes Operates Generating Plant Yes Activity Generation Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Large General Service-2000 Demand Industrial Large General Service-50 Demand Industrial RESIDENTIAL Residential Security Lights Lighting Security Lights 100 W HPS Lighting Security Lights 1000 W HPS Lighting Security Lights 250 W HPS Lighting Security Lights 400 W HPS Lighting

4

Petroleum potential of the Upper Ordovician Maquoketa Group in Illinois: A coordinated geological and geochemical study  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Ordovician Maquoketa Group in Illinois, predominantly composed of shale, calcareous shale, and carbonates, has long been considered a potential source for Illinois basin hydrocarbons. Methods used to better define the petroleum potential of the Maquoketa in the Illinois basin were lithostratigraphic study, Rock-Eval (pyrolysis) analyses, comparison of molecular markers from whole-rock extracts and produced oil, and construction of burial history models. Organic-rich submature Maquoketa potential source rocks are present in western Illinois at shallow depths on the basin flank. Deeper in the basin in southern Illinois, Rock-Eval analyses indicate that the Maquoketa shale is within the oil window. Solvent extracts of the Maquoketa from western Illinois closely resemble the Devonian New Albany Shale, suggesting that past studies may have erroneously attributed Maquoketa-generated petroleum to a New Albany source or failed to identify mixed source oils. Subtle differences between Maquoketa and New Albany solvent extracts include differences in pristane/phytane ratios, proportions of steroids, and distribution of dimethyldibenzothiophene isomers. Maquoketa solvent extracts show little resemblance to Middle Ordovician oils from the Illinois or Michigan basins. Lithostratigraphic studies identified localized thick carbonate facies in the Maquoketa, suggesting depositional response to upper Ordovician paleostructures. Sandstone facies in the Maquoketa in southwestern Illinois offer a potential source/trap play, as well as serving as potential carrier beds for hydrocarbon migration. Maquoketa source and carrier beds may feed older Ordovician rocks in faulted areas along and south of the Cottage Grove fault system in southern Illinois.

Crockett, J.E.; Oltz, D.F. (Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign (USA)); Kruge, M.A. (Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale (USA))

1990-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

5

New Lenox, Illinois: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Lenox, Illinois: Energy Resources Lenox, Illinois: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 41.5119761°, -87.9656098° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":41.5119761,"lon":-87.9656098,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

6

City of Lenox, Iowa (Utility Company) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Iowa (Utility Company) Iowa (Utility Company) Jump to: navigation, search Name City of Lenox Place Iowa Utility Id 10908 Utility Location Yes Ownership M NERC Location RFC NERC RFC Yes Operates Generating Plant Yes Activity Distribution Yes Activity Bundled Services Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Commercial Rate Commercial Industrial Rate Industrial Residential Rate # 1 Residential Residential Rate # 2 Residential Three Phase Power Rate Commercial Average Rates Residential: $0.1020/kWh Commercial: $0.0922/kWh References ↑ "EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a"

7

Source rock screening studies of Ordovician Maquoketa shale in western Illinois  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Rock-Eval (pyrolysis) studies of Ordovician Maquoketa Shale samples (cuttings and cores) from the shallow subsurface (500-800 ft deep) in western Illinois indicate that facies within the Maquoketa have potential as hydrocarbon source rocks. Dark, presumably organic-rich zones within the Maquoketa Shale were selected and analyzed for total organic carbon (TOC), Rock-Eval (pyrolysis), and bulk and clay mineralogy using x-ray diffraction. Preliminary results from six samples from Schuyler, McDonough, and Fulton Counties show TOC values ranging from 4.70% to as high as 12.90%. Rock-Eval parameters, measured by heating organic matter in an inert atmosphere, indicate source rock maturity and petroleum-generative potential. Screening studies, using the Rock-Eval process, describe very good source rock potential in facies of the Maquoketa Shale. Further studies at the Illinois State Geological Survey will expand on these preliminary results. This study complements a proposed exploration model in western Illinois and further suggests the possibility of source rocks on the flanks of the Illinois basin. Long-distance migration from more deeply buried effective source rocks in southern Illinois has been the traditional mechanism proposed for petroleum in basin-flank reservoirs. Localized source rocks can be an alternative to long-distance migration, and can expand the possibilities of basin-flank reservoirs, encouraging further exploration in these areas.

Autrey, A.; Crockett, J.E.; Dickerson, D.R.; Oltz, D.F.; Seyler, B.J.; Warren, R.

1987-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

8

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratorys (LLNL) primary mission is research and development in support of national security.

9

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - Reports  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Review Reports 2013 Independent Oversight Review of the Fire Protection Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, September 2013 Independent Oversight Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, July 2013 Activity Reports 2013 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Operational Drill at the B332 Plutonium Facility, February 2013 Activity Reports 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site Lead Planning Activities, October 2012 Review Reports 2011 Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at the Livermore Site Office, October 2011 Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, September 2011

10

LVOC - Livermore Valley Open Campus  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

LVOC - Livermore Valley Open Campus LVOC - Livermore Valley Open Campus ↓ Case Studies | ↓ About LVOC Get to market faster Making the impossible possible Lawrence Livermore and Sandia National Laboratories are home to some of the world's most unique state-of-the art facilities and resources. For decades, we have been using our combined capabilities, including a workforce of over 7000 employees to solve complex problems for the nation. Visit the science and technology epicenter - the Livermore Valley Open Campus - just east of San Francisco in the Tri-Valley's innovation ecosystem to find out what problems we can solve for you. LVOC Flyer We Keep Industry on the Cutting Edge of Innovative Technology About the Livermore Valley Open Campus LVOC Rendering Open for Business: The Livermore Valley Open Campus is located at the

11

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

March/April 2008 March/April 2008 4 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Extending the Search for Extending the Search for A new imager will allow astrophysicists to study the atmospheres of distant planets. T HE discovery of other solar systems beyond ours has been the stuff of science fiction for decades. Great excitement greeted the positive identification of the first planet outside our solar system in 1995. Since then, scientists have identified approximately 250 extrasolar planets (exoplanets), but they have had no way to study the majority of these planets or their

12

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Awards  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Awards The Laboratory bestows awards to outstanding scientists and engineers from among its workforce and for exceptionally qualified...

13

LIVERMORE SITE OFFICE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT PLAN For LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

LIVERMORE SITE OFFICE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT PLAN For LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY CONTRACT NO. DE-AC52-07NA27344 LSO_CMP_6-10-088 i CONTENTS Contents 1. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 3 2. PURPOSE .......................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Maintenance and Distribution ......................................................................................... 4 3. CONTRACT SUMMARY AND PRINCIPAL FEATURES............................................. 4 3.1 Contract Summary ...........................................................................................................

14

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2011 September 2011 Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The purpose of this review was to assess the effectiveness of the integrated safety management system (ISMS) established and implemented by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2011 More Documents & Publications Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Technical Appendices, Volume II, December 2004 Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,

15

Independent Oversight Review, Livermore Site Office - October...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Review, Livermore Site Office - October 2011 October 2011 Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at the Livermore Site Office This report provides the...

16

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Livermore National Laboratory - September 2011 September 2011 Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This report...

17

Expanding Your Horizons Conference, Lawrence Livermore National...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Expanding Your Horizons Conference, Lawrence Livermore National Lab Expanding Your Horizons Conference, Lawrence Livermore National Lab August 1, 2013 6:45PM EDT to August 31, 2013...

18

Oversight Reports - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory |...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 Review of the Fire Protection Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory July 19, 2013...

19

Analysis Activities at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation on Lawrence Livermores analysis activities to the DOE Systems Analysis Workshop held in Washington, D.C. July 28-29, 2004.

20

Edward Jones, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Outcomes...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Edward Jones, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Outcomes of U.S.-Japan Roundtable Edward Jones, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Outcomes of U.S.-Japan Roundtable...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "lenox livermore maquoketa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- June 2005  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Inspection of Emergency Management at the Livermore Site Office and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

22

Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- February 2009  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Inspection of Emergency Management at the Livermore Site Office and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

23

Santer of Lawrence Livermore National  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

But vast numbers of them form an aerosol haze that moderates and obscures the "greenhouse effect" caused by heat-trapping gases. In 1995, Benjamin Santer of Lawrence Livermore...

24

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: Phonebook  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Phonebook Phonebook Address and Phone Numbers Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 7000 East Ave., Livermore, CA 94550-9234( For deliveries, enter off of Greenville Road) P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA 94551-0808 (Mail) Main Operator (925) 422-1100 Fax (925) 422-1370, Fax verification (925) 422-1100 Employment Verification Hot Line (925) 422-9348 Public Affairs (925) 422-4599 Search for individuals by last name or full name. Use * for a wildcard. Phonebook: Warning: This Electronic Phonebook is provided solely for official use by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory community. Using information obtained from this Phonebook to contact individuals for purposes other than official Laboratory business is forbidden. If you have any questions, please contact Public Affairs at (925) 422-4599.

25

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | July 2011 Aerial View Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | July 2011 Aerial View Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL) primary mission is research and development in support of national security. As a nuclear weapons design laboratory, LLNL has responsibilities in nuclear stockpile stewardship. LLNL also applies its expertise to prevent the spread and use of weapons of mass destruction and strengthen homeland security. Other areas include advanced defense technologies, energy, environment, biosciences, and basic science. Enforcement July 22, 2013 Enforcement Letter, NEL-2013-03 Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC related to Programmatic

26

Enforcement Documents - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Enforcement Documents - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory July 22, 2013 Enforcement Letter, NEL-2013-03 Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC related to Programmatic Deficiencies in the Software Quality Assurance Program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory February 23, 2006 Preliminary Notice of Violation, University of California - EA-2006-01 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to the University of California related to Radiological Uptakes, a Radioactive Material Spill, and Radiological Protection Program, Quality Assurance, and Safety Basis Deficiencies at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory June 2, 2005 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005

27

Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - October 2012 Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - October 2012 October 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site Lead Planning Activities [HIAR LLNL-2012-10-23] The purpose of this Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Independent Oversight activity was to maintain site operational awareness of key nuclear safety performance areas, monitor ongoing site oversight and planning activities for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) nuclear facilities, and identify and initiate coordination of future HSS oversight activities at the site, including planned HSS targeted reviews planned for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013. Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -

28

Science on Saturday @ Lawrence Livermore Lab | Department of...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

on Saturday @ Lawrence Livermore Lab Science on Saturday @ Lawrence Livermore Lab January 26, 2013 1:30PM EST Bankhead Theatre in downtown Livermore, CA Science on Saturday....

29

EIS-0028: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories- Livermore Sites, Livermore, CA  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The statement assesses the potential impacts associated with current operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories , Livermore, adjacent sites. This includes the impacts from postulated accidents associated with the activities. Various effluents including radioactive ones are released to the environment. However, a continuing comprehensive monitoring program is carried out to assist in the control of hazardous effluents. Alternatives considered to current operation of the laboratories include: (1) shutdown and decommissioning, (2) total or partial relocation, (3) scaling down those operations having greatest impact , and (4) wider use of alternate technologies having reduced impact .

30

University of California Lawrence Livermore  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

University of California Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory John Lindl - LLNL Fusion Energy Program Leader *This work was performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department of Energy by Lawrence and the Inertial Fusion Energy Program #12;Outline of Talk · The National Ignition Facility (NIF) · Indirect Drive

31

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC- May 2008  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC related to the Protection of Classified Information at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

32

Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - May 2007 Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - May 2007 May 2007 Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Programs at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an inspection of environment, safety, and health (ES&H) programs at the DOE Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) during January and February 2007. The inspection was performed by Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations. LSO's oversight has matured, and operational awareness and assessments have improved in gathering data and identifying deficiencies. LSO

33

Livermore Contract Announcement | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Livermore Contract Announcement Livermore Contract Announcement Livermore Contract Announcement May 8, 2007 - 12:45pm Addthis Remarks as Prepared for Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman Good afternoon. Thank you all for coming and welcome to the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory employees who are watching this on our Webcast. I know my remarks are of special importance to you. The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory opened in 1952 using the "team science" approach pioneered by Ernest O. Lawrence. Livermore was - and is - a place where "new ideas" are dominant. Few would have predicted back then how deeply the work conducted at Lawrence Livermore would influence the course of history. And yet it has. Today is the 123rd anniversary of President Harry S Truman's birth. The first Cold War president, Truman's decisive

34

Sheldon Kamieniecki Nancy Lenox  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of Social Sciences ­ Administration Anne Hayes Associate Development Director Jane deVette Research Budget Witte Web Coordinator #12;Effective: 4/1/14 Last revised: 4/1/14 Division of Social Sciences ­ AcademicsKay, Director Center for Statistical Analysis in Social Sciences (CSASS) Douglas Bonett, Director Science

California at Santa Cruz, University of

35

Oversight Reports - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Oversight Reports - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory October 2, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 Review of the Fire Protection Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory July 19, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July 2013 Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory April 12, 2013 Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - February 2013 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Operational Drill at the B332 Plutonium Facility [HIAR LLNL-2013-02-27] December 18, 2012 Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -

36

Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - February 2009 Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - February 2009 February 2009 Inspection of Emergency Management at the Livermore Site Office and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight inspected the emergency management program at DOE's Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in October/November 2008. The inspection was performed by Independent Oversight's Office of Emergency Management Oversight. This 2008 inspection found that overall, the LLNL emergency management program is, with a few exceptions, well defined and better implemented in most areas than observed during previous inspections, but some implementation weaknesses remain that diminish the ability of the program

37

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Lawrence Livermore Site Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore Site Lawrence Livermore Site Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Lawrence Livermore Site Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Lawrence Livermore Site Office. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD September 18, 2012 CX-010083: Categorical Exclusion Determination Radiography of Explosive Samples B321C CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/18/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): Lawrence Livermore Site Office September 18, 2012 CX-009257: Categorical Exclusion Determination Radiography of Explosive Samples B321C CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/18/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): Lawrence Livermore Site Office May 14, 2012 CX-008172: Categorical Exclusion Determination High-Pressure Crogenic Pump and Hydrogen Filling Station CX(s) Applied: B5.15 Date: 05/14/2012

38

Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2005 Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2005 June 2005 Inspection of Emergency Management at the Livermore Site Office and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA), within the Office of Security and Safety Performance Assurance, conducted an inspection of the emergency management program at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) site in June 2005. The inspection was performed by the OA Office of Emergency Management Oversight. This 2005 OA inspection determined that LLNL has completed program development work or has established an appropriate framework for nearly all

39

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > M & O Support Department > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory DE-AC52-07NA27344 Operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC BASIC Contract (Official) Modifications (Official) Funding Mods Available Upon Request Conformed Contract (Unofficial) LLNL Sec A (SF33) (pdf, 91KB) See Modifications Section under Conformed Contract Link LLNS Conformed Contract (weblink) LLNL Sec B-H (pdf, 306KB) LLNL Sec I pdf 687KB LLNL Sec J Appx A (pdf, 67KB) LLNL Sec J Appx B (pdf, 191KB) LLNL Sec J Appx C (pdf, 11KB) LLNL Sec J Appx D (pdf, 18KB)

40

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Livermore National Laboratory Livermore National Laboratory (Redirected from Lawrence Livermore National Lab) Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Name Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Address 7000 East Ave. Place Livermore, California Zip 94550-9234 Number of employees 5001-10,000 Year founded 1952 Notes LLNL-WEB-422768 Coordinates 37.6798282°, -121.7107786° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":37.6798282,"lon":-121.7107786,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "lenox livermore maquoketa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

October 2012 October 2012 Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - October 2012 October 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site Lead Planning Activities [HIAR LLNL-2012-10-23] The purpose of this Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Independent Oversight activity was to maintain site operational awareness of key nuclear safety performance areas, monitor ongoing site oversight and planning activities for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) nuclear facilities, and identify and initiate coordination of future HSS oversight activities at the site, including planned HSS targeted reviews planned for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013. Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - October 2012 More Documents & Publications

42

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, (EA-2003-04) On September 3, 2003, the National Nuclear Security Administration issued a Preliminary Notice of Violation (EA-2003-04) to...

43

Enforcement Documents - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for Quality Assurance Deficiencies related to Weapon Activities, June 2, 2005 September 10, 2003 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence...

44

Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

National Laboratory - May 2007 May 2007 Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Programs at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This report provides the...

45

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

National Security, LLC - September 25, 2014 September 25, 2014 Worker Safety and Health Enforcement Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to Lawrence Livermore National...

46

Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

National Laboratory - July 2013 Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2005 Independent Oversight Inspection, Nevada Test Site - June 2007...

47

Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

and the Alameda County Fire Department to a fire in a fume hood containing a depleted uranium part. Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -...

48

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Review, Lawrence Livermore National Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - December 2009 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - December 2009 December 2009 Review of Nuclear Safety at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed a review of nuclear safety programs at the DOE Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) from October through November 2009. The review was performed by the HSS Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Evaluations. LLNL has made significant progress in establishing and implementing comprehensive programs to effectively manage nuclear safety. LLNL has devoted considerable management attention and resources to enhance nuclear

49

Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Volume I - December 2004 Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Volume I - December 2004 December 2004 Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA), within the Office of Security and Safety Performance Assurance (SSA), conducted an inspection of environment, safety, and health (ES&H) at the DOE Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) during October and November 2004. The inspection was performed by the OA Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations. LSO and LLNL have established ISM systems that are conceptually sound but

50

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 September 2013 Review of the Fire Protection Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of the fire protection program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The review was performed June 10-21, 2013, by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, which is within the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security. The review was one part of a targeted assessment of fire protection at nuclear facilities across the DOE complex, including National Nuclear Security Administration sites. The purpose of the Independent Oversight targeted assessment was to

51

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 September 2013 Review of the Fire Protection Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of the fire protection program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The review was performed June 10-21, 2013, by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, which is within the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security. The review was one part of a targeted assessment of fire protection at nuclear facilities across the DOE complex, including National Nuclear Security Administration sites. The purpose of the Independent Oversight targeted assessment was to

52

Environmental Survey preliminary report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the preliminary findings from the first phase of the Environmental Survey of the Department of Energy (DOE) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), conducted December 1 through 19, 1986. The Survey is being conducted by an interdisciplinary team of environmental specialists, led and managed by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health's Office of Environmental Audit. Individual team components are being supplied by a private contractor. The objective of the Survey is to identify environmental problems and areas of environmental risk associated with LLNL. The Survey covers all environmental media all areas of environmental regulation. It is being performed in accordance with the DOE Environmental Survey Manual. This phase of the Survey involves the review of existing site environmental data, observations of the operations performed at LLNL, and interviews with site personnel. A Sampling and Analysis Plan was developed to assist in further assessing certain of the environmental problems identified during performance of on-site activities. The Sampling and Analysis Plan will be executed by a DOE National Laboratory. When completed, the results will be incorporated into the LLNL Environmental Survey Interim Report. The Interim Report will reflect the final determinations of the LLNL Survey. 70 refs., 58 figs., 52 tabs.,

Not Available

1987-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

53

Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 2013 February 2013 Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - February 2013 February 2013 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Operational Drill at the B332 Plutonium Facility [HIAR LLNL-2013-02-27] The Livermore Site Office (LSO) and Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS) requested personnel from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (HS-45) to observe an operational drill at the Plutonium Facility in Building 332 (B332). LSO and LLNS desired HS-45's participation to help determine the maturity of the operational drill program by providing independent expertise in the matter at a time when HS-45 personnel were already on site conducting an emergency management review. LLNS administered this operational drill using the DOE guidance for

54

Livermore Contract Announcement | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

afternoon. Thank you all for coming and welcome to the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory employees who are watching this on our Webcast. I know my remarks are of special...

55

Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- March 2010  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Identified Defective Department of Transportation Hazardous Material Packages

56

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- September 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

57

Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- May 2007  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Programs at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

58

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- August 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Radiological Controls Activity-Level Implementation.

59

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- July 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

60

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2000-12 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2000-12 September 27, 2000 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to the University of California related to Authorization Basis Issues at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, (EA-2000-12) This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) investigation of the facts and circumstances concerning Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) maintenance and adherence to documents, which form the Authorization Basis (AB) for the Laboratory's nuclear facilities. Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2000-12 More Documents & Publications Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - November 5,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "lenox livermore maquoketa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

EIS-0157: Site-wide for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore/Sandia National Laboratory, Livermore  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Department of Energy prepared this environmental impact statement to analyze the potential environmental impacts of the continued operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratory - Livermore, including programmatic enhancements and facility modifications to occur over the subsequent 10-year term that are pursuant to research and development missions established for the Laboratories by Congress and the President.

62

Sandia National Laboratories: Locations: Livermore, California  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Livermore, California Livermore, California Livermore, California administration building For more than 50 years, the California campus of Sandia National Laboratories has delivered essential science and technology to resolve the nation's most challenging security issues. Many of these challenges - like energy resources, transportation, immigration, ports, and more - surfaced early in the state of California, providing Sandia/California with a special opportunity to participate in the first wave of solutions to important national problems. For example, Sandia's scientists are breaking new ground in energy research and are helping to accelerate the development of next-generation biofuels so that we can reduce our nation's dependence on foreign oil and mitigate the effects of global climate change.

63

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

National Laboratory National Laboratory Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Name Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Address 7000 East Ave. Place Livermore, California Zip 94550-9234 Number of employees 5001-10,000 Year founded 1952 Notes LLNL-WEB-422768 Coordinates 37.6798282°, -121.7107786° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":37.6798282,"lon":-121.7107786,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

64

Record simulations conducted on Lawrence Livermore supercomputer  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 5 For immediate release: 03/19/2013 | NR-13-03-05 Record simulations conducted on Lawrence Livermore supercomputer Breanna Bishop, LLNL, (925) 423-9802, bishop33@llnl.gov Printer-friendly OSIRIS simulation on Sequoia of the interaction of a fast-ignition-scale laser with a dense DT plasma. The laser field is shown in green, the blue arrows illustrate the magnetic field lines at the plasma interface and the red/yellow spheres are the laser-accelerated electrons that will heat and ignite the fuel. High Resolution Image LIVERMORE, Calif. -- Researchers at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory have performed record simulations using all 1,572,864 cores of Sequoia, the largest supercomputer in the world. Sequoia, based on IBM BlueGene/Q architecture, is the first machine to exceed one million computational

65

Researcher, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Bruce Macintosh Bruce Macintosh Researcher, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Bruce Macintosh Bruce Macintosh Role: Researcher, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Award: AAAS Newcomb Cleveland Prize Profile: A Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory researcher's paper published in November 2008 is co-winner of this year's American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Newcomb Cleveland Prize. The Paper is one of two outstanding papers published in Science from June 1, 2008 through May 31, 2009. Bruce Macintosh of the Physics and Life Science Directorate was one of the lead authors of the paper titled, "Direct Imaging of Multiple Planets orbiting the Star HR 8799," which appeared in the Nov. 28, 2008 edition of Science. Christian Marois, a former LLNL postdoc now at NRC Herzberg

66

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July 2013 July 2013 Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Livermore Field Office (LFO) and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Site 200 preparedness for severe natural phenomena events (NPEs). The HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations performed this review to evaluate the processes for identifying emergency response capabilities and

67

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2003-04 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2003-04 September 3, 2003 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to the University of California related to an Extremity Radiological Overexposure at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, (EA-2003-04) This letter refers to the recent investigation by the Department of Energy's Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) of the June 2002 extremity radiological overexposure event. Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2003-04 More Documents & Publications Preliminary Notice of Violation, University of California - EA-2006-01 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -

68

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory December 13, 2004  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

John Lindl Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory December 13, 2004 The NIF Ignition Program Presentation to Fusion Power Associates Meeting #12;NIF-0202-0XXXXppt 15/GHM/tr Outline · Ignition Introduction 104 105 500 50 5 0.5 Capsule energy (KJ) NIF Relaxed pressure and stability requirements

69

DOE Selects Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC to Manage its  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC to Manage its Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC to Manage its Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory DOE Selects Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC to Manage its Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory May 8, 2007 - 12:45pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS) has been selected to be the management and operating contractor for DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California. "Livermore National Laboratory is a critical part of our nuclear weapons complex and has been for the last 55 years," Secretary Bodman said. "For the first time since the beginning of the laboratory a new contractor is

70

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- June 2, 2005  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for Quality Assurance Deficiencies related to Weapon Activities, June 2, 2005

71

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- August 22, 1996  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Issued to the University of California related to Radiological Worker Training Deficiencies at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

72

Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- March 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program Effectiveness Review [HIAR-LLNL-2011-03-25

73

2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2013 and 2014 within the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

74

2011 Annual Planning Summary for Livermore Site Office (LSO)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2011 and 2012 within the Livermore Site Office (LSO).

75

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Livermore Operations- January 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Evaluation to determine whether the Livermore Operations is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

76

Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- February 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Operational Drill at the B332 Plutonium Facility [HIAR LLNL-2013-02-27

77

2012 Annual Planning Summary for Livermore Site Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2012 and 2013 within the Livermore Site Office.

78

UCRL-ID-119170 LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

June 1995 UCRL-ID-119170 LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY University of California · Livermore, California · 94550 Science on High-Energy Lasers: From Today to the NIF Richard W. Lee, Richard. WorkperformedundertheauspicesoftheU.S.DepartmentofEnergybyLawrenceLivermoreNationalLaboratoryunder Contract W-7405-Eng-48. #12

79

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Livermore Field  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Livermore Livermore Field Office Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Livermore Field Office The purpose of the Livermore Field Office (LFO) Teclmical Qualification Program (TQP) is to ensure that federal teclmical personnel with safety oversight responsibilities at defense nuclear facilities at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory possess competence commensurate with responsibilities. LFO is committed to ensuring it has the necessary teclmical capabilities to provide the kind of management, direction, and guidance essential to safe operation ofDOE's defense nuclear facilities. LFO TQP Self-Assessment, May 2013 More Documents & Publications Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Nevada Site Office Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Sandia Site Office

80

Workforce Statistics - Livermore Field Office | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Livermore Field Office | National Nuclear Security Livermore Field Office | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Workforce Statistics - Livermore Field Office Home > About Us > Our Operations > Management and Budget > Office of Civil Rights > Workforce Statistics > Workforce Statistics - Livermore Field Office Workforce Statistics - Livermore Field Office

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "lenox livermore maquoketa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Sandia National Laboratories: Locations: Livermore, California: Visiting  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

California California Livermore, California administration building Our location and hours of operation Sandia/California is located at 7011 East Avenue in Livermore, Calif., a suburban community about 45 miles east of San Francisco. Positioned at the eastern edge of the San Francisco Bay Area, Sandia is within easy commuting distance of many affordable housing communities in San Joaquin County and the Central Valley. The official hours of operation at Sandia/California are from 7:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. PST, Monday through Friday. General inquiries can be made by calling (925) 294-3000. See our contacts page for additional information. Getting here All three major airports in the San Francisco Bay Area provide access to Sandia/California. Oakland International Airport is the closest airport to

82

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Use of Time and Materials Subcontracts  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Use of Time and Materials Subcontracts OAS-M-13-06 August 2013 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 August 8, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, LIVERMORE FIELD OFFICE FROM: George W. Collard Assistant Inspector General for Audits Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Use of Time and Materials Subcontracts" BACKGROUND The mission of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore) is to strengthen the United States' security through development and application of science and technology to enhance the Nation's defense, reduce the global threat from terrorism and weapons of mass destruction, and respond to scientific issues of national importance. Livermore is operated by Lawrence

83

Welcome to the Livermore Field Office | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Livermore Field Office | National Nuclear Security Livermore Field Office | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog The National Nuclear Security Administration Welcome to the Livermore Field Office Home > Field Offices > Welcome to the Livermore Field Office Welcome to the Livermore Field Office The NNSA Livermore Field Office (LFO) is located at the Lawrence Livermore

84

Consent Order, Lawrence Livermore National National Security, LLC -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore National National Security, LLC - Lawrence Livermore National National Security, LLC - WCO-2010-01 Consent Order, Lawrence Livermore National National Security, LLC - WCO-2010-01 October 29, 2010 Consent Order issued to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC for deficiencies associated with the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program This letter refers to the Office of Health, Safety and Security, Office of Enforcement investigation into deficiencies associated with the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program (CBDPP) and related work planning and control processes. The results of the investigation were provided to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS) in an Investigation Report dated July 7, 2009. An

85

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC, - May 15,  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Security LLC, - May Security LLC, - May 15, 2008 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC, - May 15, 2008 May 15, 2008 Enforcement Letter issued to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC related to the Protection of Classified Information at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory In our recent dialogue via televideo with your Deputy, safeguards and security director, and other key managers of your staff, we discussed our reasons for sending this enforcement letter to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC; the purpose of this letter; and our concerns about the protection of classified information at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). Accordingly, this is not a formal enforcement action and imposes no requirements. Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC- May 15, 2008

86

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0-12 0-12 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2000-12 September 27, 2000 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to the University of California related to Authorization Basis Issues at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, (EA-2000-12) This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) investigation of the facts and circumstances concerning Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) maintenance and adherence to documents, which form the Authorization Basis (AB) for the Laboratory's nuclear facilities. Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2000-12 More Documents & Publications Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - November 5, 1999 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - August 22,

87

Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - February 2011 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - February 2011 Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - February 2011 February 2011 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Safety Basis Assessment This site visit report documents the collective results of the review of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) safety basis processes and discusses its scope, objective, results and conclusions. Appendix A provides lists of the documents, interviews, and observations and Appendix B includes the plan for the review. This combined assessment was sponsored by the National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA) Livermore Site Office (LSO) and conducted jointly by staff from the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) and LSO. The review was conducted in late 2010 and included

88

Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March 2010 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March 2010 Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March 2010 March 2010 Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Identified Defective Department of Transportation Hazardous Material Packages This review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) identification, immediate actions, communications, documentation, evaluation, reporting and follow-up to the discovery of defective Department of Transportation (DOT) UN1A2 55- and 30-gallon open head single bolt closure steel drums intended for storage and transportation of hazardous waste and materials, conducted on January 26-29, 2010, was sponsored by the DOE Livermore Site Office (LSO) to support interface with

89

Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - May 2010 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - May Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - May 2010 Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - May 2010 May 2010 Review of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Fire Protection Design Review Process This review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Fire Protection Design Review Process, conducted on March 24 through April 2, 2010, was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Livermore Site Office (LSO) and conducted jointly with LSO staff. Overall, the design review process was observed to be effective and the LLNL programs for performing these reviews were being implemented. Many aspects of the process are effective, and the personnel who implement it are knowledgeable and experienced. This review identified only one

90

Independent Activity Report, Livermore Site Office - January 2011 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Activity Report, Livermore Site Office - January 2011 Independent Activity Report, Livermore Site Office - January 2011 Independent Activity Report, Livermore Site Office - January 2011 January 2011 Livermore Site Office Facility Representative Program Assessment [ARPT-LSO-2011-001] This activity report documents the results of the Office of Health, Safety and Security's (HSS) review of and participation in the Livermore Site Office Self-Assessment of the Facility Representative (FR) Program. This self-assessment was led by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Livermore Site Office (LSO) and conducted by LSO staff, HSS staff, National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Office of the Chief of Defense Nuclear Safety (CDNS) staff, a peer from Los Alamos Site Office, and a FR subject matter expert from NNSA.

91

Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March 2011 Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March 2011 March 2011 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program Effectiveness Review [HIAR-LLNL-2011-03-25] The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and the Livermore Site Office (LSO) chartered a team to conduct an effectiveness review of the issues identified with the LLNL Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program (CBDPP). The team included members and observers from LLNL, LSO, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), and the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The team's final report documents the results of the effectiveness review and the actions taken by LLNL to resolve and prevent recurrence of 44

92

Livermore Field Office Public Affairs | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Livermore Field Office Public Affairs | National Nuclear Security Livermore Field Office Public Affairs | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Livermore Field Office Public Affairs Home > Field Offices > Welcome to the Livermore Field Office > Livermore Field Office Public Affairs Livermore Field Office Public Affairs The LFO Office of Public Affairs is the primary point of contact between

93

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July 2013 July 2013 Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Livermore Field Office (LFO) and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Site 200 preparedness for severe natural phenomena events (NPEs). The HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations performed this review to evaluate the processes for identifying emergency response capabilities and maintaining them in a state of readiness in case of a severe NPE. This

94

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: Site Map  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Site Map Site Map About LLNL What we do How we do it Our Values Organization Management and Sponsors Publications History Organizations Global Security National Ignition Facility Operations Safety & Security Science & Technology Weapons & Complex Integration Visiting LLNL Maps & Directions Badging Discovery Center Site Tours Current Weather Protocol Office Where to stay Tri-Valley Visitors Bureau City of Livermore News News Center For Reporters Social Media & Multimedia Publication Science and Technology Review Lab Report News Releases Around the Lab Community Discovery Center Site Tours Community giving Corporate giving Environmental information Community Center Contacts Discover LLNL Newsletter Volunteer Opportunities Education Internships Postdocs K - 12 Outreach Site Tours School Tours

95

EIS-0133: Decontamination and Waste Treatment Facility for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, California  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. Department of Energys San Francisco Operations Office developed this statement to analyze the potential environmental and socioeconomic impacts of alternatives for constructing and operating a Decontamination and Waste Treatment Facility for nonradioactive (hazardous and nonhazardous) mixed and radioactive wastes at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

96

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June June 2, 2005 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 June 2, 2005 Enforcement Letter Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for Quality Assurance Deficiencies related to Weapon Activities, June 2, 2005 This letter is to inform you of the Department of Energy's (DOE) concern regarding several quality assurance-related deficiencies involving actions by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) personnel. These deficiencies were associated with a cracked explosive event that occurred at the Pantex site in January 2004. The timing of this letter is intended to coincide with a DOE enforcement action stemming from this event. Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 More Documents & Publications

97

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June June 2, 2005 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 June 2, 2005 Enforcement Letter Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for Quality Assurance Deficiencies related to Weapon Activities, June 2, 2005 This letter is to inform you of the Department of Energy's (DOE) concern regarding several quality assurance-related deficiencies involving actions by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) personnel. These deficiencies were associated with a cracked explosive event that occurred at the Pantex site in January 2004. The timing of this letter is intended to coincide with a DOE enforcement action stemming from this event. Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 More Documents & Publications

98

Director of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory to Step Down...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Livermore, one of the Energy Department's national defense laboratories, through a transition to a post-Cold War world and helped carry out the NNSA's stockpile stewardship...

99

Concurrence' Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory FY2015 Ten...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

manufacturing * Special nuclear materials-plutonium and tritium * High performance computing FY2015 Ten Year Site Plan Limited Report Page 3 of 6 Lawrence Livermore...

100

FY 2011 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "lenox livermore maquoketa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Sandia National Laboratories: Working at the Livermore Valley...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Computing Innovation Center Anchored by a history of leadership in computing, Lawrence Livermore has led development of the new High Performance Computing Innovation...

102

Dr. Cook to Livermore: The Future is Bright | National Nuclear...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

equation of state, X-ray scattering and compression of diamond; Livermore's leadership in additive manufacturing; and the current environment in Washington. D.C. He offered both...

103

Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - May...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

National Laboratory - May 2010 May 2010 Review of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Fire Protection Design Review Process This site visit report documents the results of the...

104

Independent Oversight Review of the Lawrence Livermore National...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Laboratory's health services and to conduct an Accreditation Association of Ambulatory Health Care accreditation survey. Independent Oversight Review of the Lawrence Livermore...

105

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Environmental Report 2010  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purposes of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Environmental Report 2010 are to record Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL's) compliance with environmental standards and requirements, describe LLNL's environmental protection and remediation programs, and present the results of environmental monitoring at the two LLNL sites - the Livermore site and Site 300. The report is prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) by LLNL's Environmental Protection Department. Submittal of the report satisfies requirements under DOE Order 231.1A, Environmental Safety and Health Reporting, and DOE Order 5400.5, Radiation Protection of the Public and Environment. The report is distributed electronically and is available at https://saer.llnl.gov/, the website for the LLNL annual environmental report. Previous LLNL annual environmental reports beginning in 1994 are also on the website. Some references in the electronic report text are underlined, which indicates that they are clickable links. Clicking on one of these links will open the related document, data workbook, or website that it refers to. The report begins with an executive summary, which provides the purpose of the report and an overview of LLNL's compliance and monitoring results. The first three chapters provide background information: Chapter 1 is an overview of the location, meteorology, and hydrogeology of the two LLNL sites; Chapter 2 is a summary of LLNL's compliance with environmental regulations; and Chapter 3 is a description of LLNL's environmental programs with an emphasis on the Environmental Management System including pollution prevention. The majority of the report covers LLNL's environmental monitoring programs and monitoring data for 2010: effluent and ambient air (Chapter 4); waters, including wastewater, storm water runoff, surface water, rain, and groundwater (Chapter 5); and terrestrial, including soil, sediment, vegetation, foodstuff, ambient radiation, and special status wildlife and plants (Chapter 6). Complete monitoring data, which are summarized in the body of the report, are provided in Appendix A. The remaining three chapters discuss the radiological impact on the public from LLNL operations (Chapter 7), LLNL's groundwater remediation program (Chapter 8), and quality assurance for the environmental monitoring programs (Chapter 9). The report uses System International units, consistent with the federal Metric Conversion Act of 1975 and Executive Order 12770, Metric Usage in Federal Government Programs (1991). For ease of comparison to environmental reports issued prior to 1991, dose values and many radiological measurements are given in both metric and U.S. customary units. A conversion table is provided in the glossary.

Jones, H E; Bertoldo, N A; Campbell, C G; Cerruti, S J; Coty, J D; Dibley, V R; Doman, J L; Grayson, A R; MacQueen, D H; Wegrecki, A M; Armstrong, D H; Brigdon, S L; Heidecker, K R; Hollister, R K; Khan, H N; Lee, G S; Nelson, J C; Paterson, L E; Salvo, V J; Schwartz, W W; Terusaki, S H; Wilson, K R; Woods, J M; Yimbo, P O; Gallegos, G M; Terrill, A A; Revelli, M A; Rosene, C A; Blake, R G; Woollett, J S; Kumamoto, G

2011-09-14T23:59:59.000Z

106

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: News Center Distribution  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

News > News > News Center > Receive News Releases Receive News Releases Journalists: To receive information about activities at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, please complete the form below. The form may also be used to submit changes in your contact information or to remove yourself from the list. If you have any questions, please contact Media Relations at (925) 422-4599 or send an e-mail message to Kirsten Sprott. Type of Request: New Addition to News Media List Change Information Delete Information Your Name Title E-Mail Address Preferred E-Mail Address Direct Business Phone Number (with area code) Business Fax Number (with area code) News Organization Street Address City State Country Zip Code f815eee8931dfda40651bfb5302ac9a7 1389471929 Type of News Services You Use:

107

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: Social Media  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Social Media Social Media By staying on the cutting edge of Web communication, the News Center at LLNL reaches out to the media and the public through a variety of social media and multimedia Websites: Flickr An image- and video-hosting Website. Visit now and view the LLNL photostream in a variety of formats. Twitter A microblogging service. Sign up today and get short, tiimely messages about the Livermore Lab. Facebook A social-networking Website with more than 500 million active users. Enlist now to become a "friend" of LLNL. RSS A Web-feed service that sends content to subscribers automatically. Enroll at once to get the latest LLNL headlines. Utube A video-sharing Website. Navigate here to immediately watch the latest in cutting-edge science and technology at the Laboratory.

108

Dr. Yuan Ping Lawrence Livermore National Lab  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Creating, diagnosing and Creating, diagnosing and controlling high-energy- density matter with lasers Dr. Yuan Ping Lawrence Livermore National Lab Tuesday, Oct 22, 2013 - 3:00PM MBG AUDITORIUM Refreshments at 2:45PM The PrinceTon Plasma Physics laboraTory is a U.s. DeParTmenT of energy faciliTy Since their invention in 1960's, lasers with power spanning from Kilo- Watt to PetaWatt have been widely used in almost every branch of sci- ence, leading to numerous discoveries and novel techniques. At present, lasers are capable of creating extreme states of matter in a laboratory, at conditions resembling those most extreme in the Universe: they heat matter up to the temperatures inside stars, they create electric field and

109

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Livermore Field  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Livermore Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Livermore Field Office Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Livermore Field Office The purpose of the Livermore Field Office (LFO) Teclmical Qualification Program (TQP) is to ensure that federal teclmical personnel with safety oversight responsibilities at defense nuclear facilities at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory possess competence commensurate with responsibilities. LFO is committed to ensuring it has the necessary teclmical capabilities to provide the kind of management, direction, and guidance essential to safe operation ofDOE's defense nuclear facilities. LFO TQP Self-Assessment, May 2013 More Documents & Publications Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Pacific Northwest

110

Lawrence Livermore to build advanced laser system in Czech Republic  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9-06 9-06 For immediate release: 09/17/2013 | NR-13-09-06 High Resolution Image The High Repetition-Rate Advanced Petawatt Laser System, or HAPLS, will be designed, developed, assembled and tested at Lawrence Livermore. It will be transferred to the ELI Beamlines facility in 2016, where it will be commissioned for use by the international scientific community. Lawrence Livermore to build advanced laser system in Czech Republic Breanna Bishop, LLNL, (925) 423-9802, bishop33@llnl.gov High Resolution Image Artist renderings of the ELI Beamlines facility, currently under construction in the Czech Republic. High Resolution Image A CAD image of the ELI-HAPLS laser. LIVERMORE, Calif. - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), through Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC (LLNS), has been awarded more than

111

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-98-01 March 9, 1998 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to University of California related to the Unplanned Personnel Contaminations and Radioactive Material Intakes at the Hazardous Waste Management Facilities at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, (EA-98-01) This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances surrounding the unplanned personnel contaminations/intakes at [a building] of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL) Hazardous Waste Management Facilities on July 2, 1997. Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-98-01 More Documents & Publications Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -

112

Site Visit Report, Livermore Site Office - February 2011 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Site Visit Report, Livermore Site Office - February 2011 Site Visit Report, Livermore Site Office - February 2011 Site Visit Report, Livermore Site Office - February 2011 February 2011 Livermore Site Office Safety Basis Self-Assessment This site visit report documents the collective results of the Office of Health, Safety and Security's (HSS) assessment of National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA) Livermore Site Office (LSO) safety basis processes and discusses its scope, objective, results and conclusions. Appendix A provides lists of the documents, interviews, and observations and Appendix B includes the plan for the review. The assessment was sponsored by LSO as a self-assessment and conducted jointly by HSS and LSO staff. It was completed in late 2010 and included site visits from November 29 - December

113

Independent Oversight Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March 2001 Independent Oversight Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March 2001 March 2001 Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Health Services Department The Office of Environment, Safety, and Health (ES&H) Oversight (EH-2) in conjunction with the Accreditation Association of Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC) reviewed the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Health Services Department on March 19-21, 2001. The purpose of the review was twofold. First, EH-2 performed a review of selected activities to identify positive attributes, issues, and opportunities for improvement. Second, the AAAHC surveyed the medical program for accreditation. This report documents

114

J.G. Tobin and S.-W. Yu Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Differentiation of 5f and 6d Components Differentiation of 5f and 6d Components in the Unoccupied Electronic Structure of UO 2 J.G. Tobin and S.-W. Yu Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA Summary: One of the crucial questions of all actinide electronic structure determinations is the issue of 5f versus 6d character and the distribution of these components across the density of states. Here, two break-though experiments will be discussed, which have allowed the direct determination of the U5f and U6d contributions to the unoccupied density of states (UDOS) in Uranium Dioxide (UO 2 ). [1] First, a combined soft X-ray Absorption and Bremstrahlung Isochromat Spectroscopy (XAS and BIS, respectively) study of UO 2 will be discussed. [2] Second, a novel Resonant Inverse Photoelectron and X-ray Emission Spectroscopy (RIPES and

115

Lesson Learned by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Activity-level Work Planning and Control  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Slide Presentation by Donna J. Governor, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Lessons Learned by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Activity-Level Work Planning & Control.

116

Performance of Work for a Non-Department Entity at Lawrence Livermore...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory INS-O-14-01 January 2014 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 January 29, 2014 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, LIVERMORE FIELD...

117

Consent Order, Lawrence Livermore National National Security, LLC- WCO-2010-01  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC for deficiencies associated with the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program

118

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - November 5,  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 5, 1999 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - November 5, 1999 November 5, 1999 Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory related to Authorization Basis Issues This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning issues related to the maintenance and adherence to documents which form the authorization basis for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) operated nuclear facilities. Specifically, three Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) reports were submitted over a four-day period and are summarized below: On July 30, 1999, it was reported that two cabinets contained about [specified amount] of [ ] solvents in violation of the building Safety Analysis Documentation;

119

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - November 5,  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 5, 1999 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - November 5, 1999 November 5, 1999 Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory related to Authorization Basis Issues This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning issues related to the maintenance and adherence to documents which form the authorization basis for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) operated nuclear facilities. Specifically, three Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) reports were submitted over a four-day period and are summarized below: On July 30, 1999, it was reported that two cabinets contained about [specified amount] of [ ] solvents in violation of the building Safety Analysis Documentation;

120

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - August 22,  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August August 22, 1996 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - August 22, 1996 August 22, 1996 Issued to the University of California related to Radiological Worker Training Deficiencies at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL) report of a potential noncompliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection). This potential noncompliance involved the failure to complete required radiological worker retraining for 49 percent of LLNL's approximately 700 radiological workers. The training issue was initially identified on May 6, 1996, by LLNL during a routine review of the Chemistry and Materials Science deficiency

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "lenox livermore maquoketa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Director of the National Ignition Facility, Lawrence Livermore National  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Director of the National Ignition Facility, Lawrence Livermore National Director of the National Ignition Facility, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Who We Are > In The Spotlight > Edward Moses Director of the National Ignition Facility, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

122

Retired lab physicist and computational pioneer, Lawrence Livermore  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Retired lab physicist and computational pioneer, Lawrence Livermore Retired lab physicist and computational pioneer, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Who We Are > In The Spotlight > Berni Alder Retired lab physicist and computational pioneer, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

123

Associate director for Physical and Life Sciences, Lawrence Livermore  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Associate director for Physical and Life Sciences, Lawrence Livermore Associate director for Physical and Life Sciences, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Who We Are > In The Spotlight > William Goldstein Associate director for Physical and Life Sciences, Lawrence Livermore

124

FY 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PEP | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

PEP | National Nuclear PEP | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PEP Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PEP FY 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PEP

125

Lawrence Livermore Site Office Manager Joins EM's Senior Leadership Team  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore Site Office Manager Joins EM's Senior Lawrence Livermore Site Office Manager Joins EM's Senior Leadership Team Lawrence Livermore Site Office Manager Joins EM's Senior Leadership Team November 9, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis WASHINGTON, D.C. - EM Acting Assistant Secretary Dave Huizenga announced today that Alice Williams, manager of the DOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Lawrence Livermore Site Office has joined the EM senior leadership team. "I am very excited to have Alice join EM Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary Tracy Mustin and I as we continue work toward the achievement of the EM vision and the continuing evolution of an EM organization that is focused on delivery of mission success to meet the nation's needs in the 21st century," Huizenga said. In ensuing months, Williams will work closely with Huizenga and Mustin as

126

Cold cases heat up through Lawrence Livermore approach to identifying  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

10-03 10-03 For immediate release: 10/10/2012 | NR-12-10-03 Cold cases heat up through Lawrence Livermore approach to identifying remains Anne M Stark, LLNL, (925) 422-9799, stark8@llnl.gov Printer-friendly Bruce Buchholz loads a sample in the accelerator. High Resolution Image LIVERMORE, Calif. -- In an effort to identify the thousands of John/Jane Doe cold cases in the United States, a Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory researcher and a team of international collaborators have found a multidisciplinary approach to identifying the remains of missing persons. Using "bomb pulse" radiocarbon analysis developed at Lawrence Livermore, combined with recently developed anthropological analysis and forensic DNA techniques, the researchers were able to identify the remains of a missing

127

Boralex Beaver Livermore Falls Biomass Facility | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Livermore Falls Biomass Facility Livermore Falls Biomass Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Boralex Beaver Livermore Falls Biomass Facility Facility Boralex Beaver Livermore Falls Sector Biomass Location Androscoggin County, Maine Coordinates 44.1912416°, -70.1707037° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":44.1912416,"lon":-70.1707037,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

128

Lawrence Livermore National Security Enforcement Letter (NEL-2013-03)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Penrose C. Albright Penrose C. Albright Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 July 22, 2013 President and Laboratory Director Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 7000 East Avenue Livermore, California 94550 NEL-2013-03 Dear Dr. Albright: The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight has evaluated the facts and circumstances surrounding programmatic deficiencies identified in the Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS) software quality assurance (SQA) program. LLNS reported these deficiencies on January 16, 2013, in Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report NTS--LSO-LLNL-LLNL- 2013-0001, LLNL Software Quality Assurance Program Does Not Meet DOE 0 414.1 D Standards and Procedures Requirements.

129

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Livermore  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6.W~~l 6.W~~l #II VA. 'lf,fi:'¥Ylj Nsffonal Nuclear Security Admfnfat111tlon Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Livermore Site Office PO Box 808, L-293 7000 East Avenue Livermore, California 94551-0808 !JAN 18 2013 3250 COR-M0-1/17/2013-490077 MEMORANDUM FOR KAREN L. BOARDMAN CHAIRPERSON FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PANEL FROM: v KIMBERLY DAVIS LEBAK "/'JJ. f /ti/ MANAGER ~ ..--r; tV[ SUBJECT: REFRENCE: Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for the Livermore Field Office 2012, Revision I Memorandum (K. Boardman/Distribution), Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2012, dated October 24, 2012 Please see the attached revised Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for the Livermore

130

FY 2009 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2009 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2009 Lawrence Livermore National Security,

131

Livermore Site Office Facility Representative Program Self-Assessment  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ARPT-LSO-2011-001 ARPT-LSO-2011-001 Site: Livermore Site Office Subject: Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Activity Report for the Livermore Site Office Facility Representative Program Self-Assessment Dates of Activity 01/24/2011 - 01/28/2011 Report Preparer Robert Freeman Activity Description/Purpose: This activity report documents the results of the Office of Health, Safety and Security's (HSS) review of and participation in the Livermore Site Office Self-Assessment of the Facility Representative (FR) Program. This self-assessment was led by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Livermore Site Office (LSO) and conducted by LSO staff, HSS staff, National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Office of the Chief of Defense Nuclear Safety (CDNS) staff, a peer from Los Alamos Site

132

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3-04 3-04 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2003-04 September 3, 2003 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to the University of California related to an Extremity Radiological Overexposure at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, (EA-2003-04) This letter refers to the recent investigation by the Department of Energy's Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) of the June 2002 extremity radiological overexposure event. Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2003-04 More Documents & Publications Preliminary Notice of Violation, University of California - EA-2006-01 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-98-06 Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health

133

Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 2011 March 2011 Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March 2011 March 2011 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program Effectiveness Review [HIAR-LLNL-2011-03-25] The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and the Livermore Site Office (LSO) chartered a team to conduct an effectiveness review of the issues identified with the LLNL Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program (CBDPP). The team included members and observers from LLNL, LSO, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), and the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The team's final report documents the results of the effectiveness review and the actions taken by LLNL to resolve and prevent recurrence of 44

134

Four Lawrence Livermore researchers named 2013 APS Fellows  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 6 For immediate release: 12/23/2013 | NR-13-12-06 Four Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory scientists have been selected as 2013 fellows of the American Physical Society (APS). They include, from left: Charles Cerjan, Ian Thompson, Eric Schwegler and Marilyn Schneider. Four Lawrence Livermore researchers named 2013 APS Fellows Breanna Bishop, LLNL, (925) 423-9802, bishop33@llnl.gov LIVERMORE, Calif. - Four Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory scientists have been selected as 2013 fellows of the American Physical Society (APS). Physicist Charles Cerjan was cited by the Division of Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics for "seminal contributions to time-dependent Schrodinger equation propagation algorithms and their application to particle scattering and intense field dynamics, the development of laser-produced

135

NSO PAC 4 Meeting Agenda Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

NSO PAC 4 Meeting Agenda Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Summit Room in Bldg 132 Thursday of NIF 7:00 pm Adjourn for Dinner Friday, November 30, 2001 8:00 am Preparation of Report 10:15 am Break

136

Science on Saturday @ Lawrence Livermore Lab | Department of...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

16, 2013 2:30PM EST Bankhead Theatre in downtown Livermore, CA Science on Saturday. Science on Saturday (SOS) is a series of science lectures for middle and high school students....

137

Science on Saturday @ Lawrence Livermore Lab | Department of...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2, 2013 1:30PM EST Bankhead Theatre, downtown Livermore CA Science on Saturday. Science on Saturday (SOS) is a series of science lectures for middle and high school students. Each...

138

Science on Saturday @ Lawrence Livermore Lab | Department of...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

23, 2013 2:30PM EST Bankhead Theatre in downtown Livermore CA Science on Saturday. Science on Saturday (SOS) is a series of science lectures for middle and high school students....

139

Livermore Scientists Team with Russia to Discover Element 118  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

"Synthesis of the isotopes of elements 118 and 116" (Abstract) "Synthesis of the isotopes of elements 118 and 116" (Abstract) Physical Review C, October 9, 2006 Livermore Scientists Team With Russia To Discover Elements 113 and 115 LLNL News Release, February. 2, 2004 "Present at the Creation" Science & Technology Review, January/February 2002 Island of Stability NOVA Science Now, September 2006 Social Media Logos Follow LLNL on YouTube Subscribe to LLNL's RSS feed Follow LLNL on Facebook Follow LLNL on Twitter Follow LLNL on Flickr Contact: Anne M. Stark Phone: (925) 422-9799 E-mail: stark8l@llnl.gov FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE October 16, 2006 NR-06-10-03 Livermore scientists team with Russia to discover element 118 LIVERMORE, Calif. - Scientists from the Chemistry, Materials and Life Sciences Directorate at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, in

140

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC- September 25, 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Worker Safety and Health Enforcement Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "lenox livermore maquoketa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Volume I- December 2004  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

142

Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Summary Report- July 2002  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health and Emergency Management at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

143

Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Laborat... Laborat... file:///I|/Data%20Migration%20Task/EIS-0157-FEIS-03-1992/05eis0157_f.html[6/27/2011 9:57:50 AM] APPENDIX F ECOLOGY AND BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT This appendix contains two major sections. Section F.1 is a discussion of the ecological characteristics at the LLNL Livermore site, LLNL Site 300, and SNL, Livermore (referred to collectively as the study sites); and presents information and data on the flora and fauna in the upland areas (see Appendix G for a detailed analysis of wetlands at the study sites). This section focuses on the biological features of LLNL Site 300 because this 7000-acre site is largely undeveloped and represents the most biologically diverse area under study. In contrast, the LLNL Livermore site and SNL, Livermore are developed areas that provide only marginal wildlife habitat because of the high degree of human activity and the few

144

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site Lead Planning Activities, October 2012  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Report Number: HIAR LLNL-2012-10-23 Site: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for Site Lead Planning Activities at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Dates of Activity 10/23/2012 - 10/24/2012 Report Preparer: Robert Freeman Activity Description/Purpose: The purpose of this Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Independent Oversight activity was to maintain site operational awareness of key nuclear safety performance areas, monitor ongoing site oversight and planning activities for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) nuclear facilities, and identify and initiate coordination of future HSS oversight activities at the site, including planned HSS targeted reviews planned for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013.

145

California utilities partner with Lawrence Livermore to improve state's  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2-12-04 2-12-04 For immediate release: 12/20/2012 | NR-12-12-04 California utilities partner with Lawrence Livermore to improve state's energy grid Lynda L Seaver, LLNL, (925) 423-3103, seaver1@llnl.gov Printer-friendly California utilities will use the advanced technologies and expertise of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory to improve the efficiency, security and safety of the state's utility systems under an agreement approved today by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). The CPUC approved funding of a five-year research and development agreement between Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Southern California Edison Company and San Diego Gas and Electric Company, and Lawrence Livermore (LLNL) that will provide the utilities with access to LLNL technological

146

Lawrence Livermore and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute scientists set a  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 6 For immediate release: 04/30/2013 | NR-13-04-06 Lawrence Livermore and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute scientists set a new simulation speed record on the Sequoia supercomputer Donald B Johnston, LLNL, (925) 423-4902, johnston19@llnl.gov Printer-friendly Lawrence Livermore scientists, from left, David Jefferson and Peter Barnes. Photo by Laura Schulz and Meg Epperly/LLNL High Resolution Image Computer scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute have set a high performance computing speed record that opens the way to the scientific exploration of complex planetary-scale systems. In a paper to be published in May, the joint team will announce a record-breaking simulation speed of 504 billion events per second on LLNL's

147

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-98-06 July 28, 1998 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to the University of California related to Criticality Safety and the Quality Assurance Program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, July 28, 1998 (EA-98-06) This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances surrounding a series of criticality safety infractions occurring between May and December 1997 in [a building] at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). [The building] is the central repository used to process and store [radioactive material]. During the period May 20 through July 15, 1997, Certified [Radioactive Material] Handlers violated criticality safety procedures for mass limits and form

148

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site Lead Planning Activities, October 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Report Number: HIAR LLNL-2012-10-23 Site: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for Site Lead Planning Activities at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Dates of Activity 10/23/2012 - 10/24/2012 Report Preparer: Robert Freeman Activity Description/Purpose: The purpose of this Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Independent Oversight activity was to maintain site operational awareness of key nuclear safety performance areas, monitor ongoing site oversight and planning activities for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) nuclear facilities, and identify and initiate coordination of future HSS oversight activities at the site, including planned HSS targeted reviews planned for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013.

149

Energy Innovations from Livermore Lab to Power Hawaiian Nonprofit |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Innovations from Livermore Lab to Power Hawaiian Nonprofit Innovations from Livermore Lab to Power Hawaiian Nonprofit Energy Innovations from Livermore Lab to Power Hawaiian Nonprofit February 28, 2011 - 11:31am Addthis Mike Gleason (second from left), president and CEO of The Arc of Hilo. Also shown, from left: Annemarie Meike, Mark Sueksdorf, Marjorie Gonzalez and Larry Ferderber | Photo Courtesy of LLNL Mike Gleason (second from left), president and CEO of The Arc of Hilo. Also shown, from left: Annemarie Meike, Mark Sueksdorf, Marjorie Gonzalez and Larry Ferderber | Photo Courtesy of LLNL April Saylor April Saylor Former Digital Outreach Strategist, Office of Public Affairs What are the key facts? LLNL technologies will reduce the plant's electrical bills by 50 percent and provide sustainable and energy efficient solutions for the

150

FY 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

PER Summary | National PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, ...

151

Technical Safety Appraisal of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents the results of the Technical Safety Appraisal (TSA) of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) (including the Site 300 area), Livermore, California, conducted from February 26 to April 5, 1990. The purpose of the assessment was to provide the Secretary of Energy with the status of Environment, Safety and Health (ES H) Programs at LLNL. LLNL is operated by the University of California for the Department of Energy (DOE), and is a multi-program, mission-oriented institution engaged in fundamental and applied research programs that require a multidisciplinary approach. 1 fig.

Not Available

1990-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

152

Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-1992/01eis0157_a.html[6/27/2011 9:53:34 AM] 2-1992/01eis0157_a.html[6/27/2011 9:53:34 AM] APPENDIX A DESCRIPTION OF MAJOR PROGRAMS AND FACILITIES Appendix A describes the programs, infrastructures, facilities, and future plans of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and the Sandia National Laboratories at Livermore (SNL, Livermore). It provides information on existing activities and facilities, as well as information on those activities anticipated to occur or facilities to be constructed over the next 5 to 10 years. The purpose of this appendix is to: present information that can be used to evaluate the proposed action and other EIS/EIR alternatives, identify activities that are part of the proposed action, distinguish proposed action activities from no action alternative activities, and

153

Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary-1992.html[6/24/2011 3:44:58 PM] Summary-1992.html[6/24/2011 3:44:58 PM] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the Regents of the University of California (UC) propose the continued operation, including near-term (within 5 to 10 years) proposed projects, of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). In addition, DOE proposes the continued operation, including near-term proposed projects, of Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore (SNL, Livermore). Continued operation plus proposed projects at the two Laboratories is needed so that the research and development missions established by Congress and the President can continue to be supported. As provided and encouraged by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), DOE and UC have prepared this document as a joint Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and

154

Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Health Services Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environment, Safety, and Health Environment, Safety, and Health Oversight Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Health Services Department March 2001 Office of Environment, Safety and Health i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACRONYMS................................................................................................................. iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 1 2.0 RESULTS .............................................................................................................. 2 3.0 CONCLUSIONS.................................................................................................... 4 APPENDIX A.................................................................................................................

155

Fact Sheet: Collaboration of Oak Ridge, Argonne, and Livermore (CORAL)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Collaboration of Oak Ridge, Argonne, and Livermore (CORAL) is a joint procurement activity among three of the Department of Energys National Laboratories launched in 2014 to build state-of-the-art high-performance computing technologies that are essential for supporting U.S. national nuclear security and are key tools used for technology advancement and scientific discovery.

156

Timely delivery of LIFE Tom Anklam, Lawrence Livermore  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Timely delivery of LIFE Tom Anklam, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory October 19, 2011 LIFE_Royal_Society_9/7/11 6 LIFE Fusion Chamber is About the Same Scale as the NIF Target Chamber #12;LIFE Fusion Physics will be Demonstrated on the NIF #12;LIFE will use a modular laser architeccture #12;#12;#12;11 NIF

157

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report- Livermore Field Office- 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The purpose of the Livermore Field Office (LFO) Teclmical Qualification Program (TQP) is to ensure that federal teclmical personnel with safety oversight responsibilities at defense nuclear facilities at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory possess competence commensurate with responsibilities.

158

Independent Oversight Inspection of Emergency Management at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - Volume II  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance Office of the Secretary of Energy July 2002 Volume II INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT INSPECTION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AT THE LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY Volume II July 2002 i INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT INSPECTION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AT THE LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY Volume II Table of Contents Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................... iii 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................1 2.0 Results .......................................................................................................................................3

159

A phenomenological model of the current filamentation instability driven by cathode processes in the Livermore spheromak  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The current density on the open field lines of the Livermore spheromak (SSPX) typically exceeds the saturation current...

D. D. Ryutov; R. H. Cohen; D. N. Hill

2003-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

160

Supplement analysis for continued operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore. Volume 2: Comment response document  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy (DOE), prepared a draft Supplement Analysis (SA) for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore (SNL-L), in accordance with DOE`s requirements for implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (10 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Part 1021.314). It considers whether the Final Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore (1992 EIS/EIR) should be supplement3ed, whether a new environmental impact statement (EIS) should be prepared, or no further NEPA documentation is required. The SA examines the current project and program plans and proposals for LLNL and SNL-L, operations to identify new or modified projects or operations or new information for the period from 1998 to 2002 that was not considered in the 1992 EIS/EIR. When such changes, modifications, and information are identified, they are examined to determine whether they could be considered substantial or significant in reference to the 1992 proposed action and the 1993 Record of Decision (ROD). DOE released the draft SA to the public to obtain stakeholder comments and to consider those comments in the preparation of the final SA. DOE distributed copies of the draft SA to those who were known to have an interest in LLNL or SNL-L activities in addition to those who requested a copy. In response to comments received, DOE prepared this Comment Response Document.

NONE

1999-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "lenox livermore maquoketa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Final Revised Environmental Assessment for The Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

R R Final Revised Environmental Assessment for The Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California Issued: December 2002 Revised: January 2008 Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Livermore Site Office This page intentionally left blank. FINAL Revised EA for the Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at LLNL ii FORWARD The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) of the Department of Energy (DOE) has responsibility for national programs to reduce and counter threats from weapons of mass destruction including nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons (bioweapons). NNSA's bioscience work at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in support of these

162

It's only natural: Lawrence Livermore helps find link to  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 1 For immediate release: 03/04/2013 | NR-13-03-01 It's only natural: Lawrence Livermore helps find link to arsenic-contaminated groundwater Anne M Stark, LLNL, (925) 422-9799, stark8@llnl.gov Printer-friendly Hand pump at a community well of a sampling site in Bangladesh. Human activities are not the primary cause of arsenic found in groundwater in Bangladesh. Instead, a team of researchers from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Barnard College, Columbia University, University of Dhaka, Desert Research Institute and University of Tennessee found that the arsenic in groundwater in the region is part of a natural process that predates any recent human activity, such as intensive pumping. The results appear in the March 4 edition of the Proceedings of the

163

Public Affairs Office: Livermore Lab Physicist Dates Lifetime of Solar  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Dating the Solar System: Where Were You When the Solar System Was Being Formed? Dating the Solar System: Where Were You When the Solar System Was Being Formed? Chemistry & Materials Science Directorate, LLNL Chronology of the early Solar System from chondrule-bearing calcium-aluminium-rich inclusions Nature, April 21, 2005 Building Planets at PSI: The Origin of the Solar System Planetary Science Institute Social Media Logos Follow LLNL on YouTube Subscribe to LLNL's RSS feed Follow LLNL on Facebook Follow LLNL on Twitter Follow LLNL on Flickr Contact: Anne M. Stark Phone: (925) 422-9799 E-mail: stark8@llnl.gov FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 20, 2005 NR-05-04-02 Livermore Lab physicist dates lifetime of solar nebula at two million years LIVERMORE, Calif. - The oxygen and magnesium content of some of the oldest objects in the universe are giving clues to the lifetime of the

164

Laser fusion experiment yields record energy at Lawrence Livermore's  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 4 For immediate release: 08/26/2013 | NR-13-08-04 High Resolution Image All NIF experiments are controlled and orchestrated by the integrated computer control system in the facility's control room. It consists of 950 front-end processors attached to about 60,000 control points, including mirrors, lenses, motors, sensors, cameras, amplifiers, capacitors and diagnostic instruments. Laser fusion experiment yields record energy at Lawrence Livermore's National Ignition Facility Breanna Bishop, LLNL, (925) 423-9802, bishop33@llnl.gov High Resolution Image The preamplifiers of the National Ignition Facility are the first step in increasing the energy of laser beams as they make their way toward the target chamber. LIVERMORE, Calif. -- In the early morning hours of Aug.13, Lawrence

165

Smashing science: Livermore scientists discover how explosives respond to  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 3 For immediate release: 12/12/2013 | NR-13-12-03 High Resolution Image A schematic representation of the shock experiment. The resulting energy release pushed the shock front to the left. Image by Liam Krauss/LLNL. Smashing science: Livermore scientists discover how explosives respond to shockwaves Anne M Stark, LLNL, (925) 422-9799, stark8@llnl.gov Watch Video A laser pulse impinging on an aluminum ablation layer (which is coated on a glass substrate to the right), which generates a rapidly expanding plasma. This small explosion pushes the ablator to the left and drives a shock wave in the sample. The experiment simultaneously measures the speed of the shock wave in the sample, and the speed of the ablator expansion, which allows Livermore researchers to estimate the pressure and density of the

166

Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Lawrence Livermore Laboratory  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore Laboratory Lawrence Livermore Laboratory October 12, 2011 Agenda Open Plenary Meeting Session 9:30 AM-9:45 AM Welcome and Overview Secretary Steven Chu and Dr. William Perry 9:45 AM-10:00 AM Director's Perspective George Miller, LLNL Director 10:00 AM-10:40 AM LLNL Progress Towards Ignition and Weapons Physics Experiments on NIF Bruce Goodwin and Ed Moses 10:40 AM-11:00 AM LLNL Strategy for Improvements in Cyber Security Jim Brase 11:00 AM-11:20 AM LLNL Computational Advances in Applied Energy Julio Friedman 11:20 AM-12:00 PM DOE in the Innovation Chain Secretary Chu 12:00 PM-1:30 PM Lunch Break 1:30 PM-1:45 PM Subcommittee Updates 1:45 PM-2:30 PM Blue Ribbon Commission Update

167

Alan Alda awards Lawrence Livermore engineer for making science  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 1 For immediate release: 06/04/2013 | NR-13-06-01 From left: Steve Maguire, who won in the video category of the 2013 Flame Challenge, Alan Alda and Nick Williams, who won in the written category. Alan Alda awards Lawrence Livermore engineer for making science understandable Linda A Lucchetti, LLNL, (925) 422-5815, lucchetti1@llnl.gov Students from Candlewood Middle School in Dix Hills N.Y. join Alan Alda in presenting the Flame Challege Award to Nick Williams at the World Science Festival. What is time? How would you explain it to a 5th grader? Nick Williams, a retired engineer and science presenter from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory not only has done a fine job of conveying the concept of time to 11 year olds, he's being recognized for it. Williams

168

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory environmental report for 1990  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents the results of the Environmental Monitoring Program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and presents summary information about environmental compliance for 1990. To evaluate the effect of LLNL operations on the local environment, measurements of direct radiation and a variety of radionuclides and chemical compounds in ambient air, soil, sewage effluent surface water, groundwater, vegetation, and foodstuff were made at both the Livermore site and at Site 300 nearly. LLNL's compliance with all applicable guides, standards, and limits for radiological and nonradiological emissions to the environment was evaluated. Aside from an August 13 observation of silver concentrations slightly above guidelines for discharges to the sanitary sewer, all the monitoring data demonstrated LLNL compliance with environmental laws and regulations governing emission and discharge of materials to the environment. In addition, the monitoring data demonstrated that the environmental impacts of LLNL are minimal and pose no threat to the public to or to the environment. 114 refs., 46 figs., 79 tabs.

Sims, J.M.; Surano, K.A.; Lamson, K.C.; Balke, B.K.; Steenhoven, J.C.; Schwoegler, D.R. (eds.)

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

169

Livermore team successfully leads important test of a conventional warhead  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

102813_dod 102813_dod 10/28/2013 Livermore team successfully leads important test of a conventional warhead for the DoD Anne M Stark, LLNL, (925) 422-9799, stark8@llnl.gov LLNL served as technical lead and integrator on an important test to assess a new conventional warhead designed by the Lab. Dave Hare, Livermore's program manager of the test, called it an "unequivocal success." Below is the press release from the Department of Defense Defense Department successfully conducts warhead sled test The Defense Department announced recently the successful testing of an advanced conventional precision effects warhead, a critical part of a national effort to establish a conventional prompt strike capability. This capability will contribute to the country's ability to defend its interests

170

Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1-1992/01eis0157_rg.html[6/24/2011 4:00:49 PM] 1-1992/01eis0157_rg.html[6/24/2011 4:00:49 PM] READER'S GUIDE The Final EIS/EIR is organized to assist the reader's understanding of the complex operations at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore. Organization of Documents The EIS/EIR is divided into five volumes and two companion reports: Volume I. This volume contains the Final EIS/EIR, which in part relies on the detailed information in the appendices, and comprehensively discusses the proposed action, the alternatives, and the existing conditions and impacts of the proposed action and the alternatives. Volume II. This volume contains the Final EIS/EIR technical appendices which provide technical support for the analyses in Volume I and also provide additional information and references. Appendix E was originally identified in

171

Lenox, Iowa: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

6547°, -94.5619095° 6547°, -94.5619095° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":40.8816547,"lon":-94.5619095,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

172

LabUPDATE ISSUE 8 AUGUST 6, 2003 News about the Berkeley, Livermore and Los Alamos national laboratories,  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

with LLNL, Sandia, Northrop Grumman Space Technology/Cutting Edge Optronics.) From Lawrence Livermore

Knowles, David William

173

Fixed Monthly Living Expense Payments at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, INS-L-11-05  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Fixed Monthly Living Expense Fixed Monthly Living Expense Payments at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory INS-L-11-05 September 2011 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 21, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR MANAGER, LIVERMORE SITE OFFICE FROM: Sandra D. Bruce Assistant Inspector General for Inspections SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Inspection Report on "Fixed Monthly Living Expense Payments at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory" BACKGROUND The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore) is a Department of Energy (Department) laboratory managed and operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the Department's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). Livermore's mission is to ensure the safety and security of the nation through applied science and technology in key

174

Top 10 Things You Didn't Know About Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 Things You Didn't Know About Lawrence Livermore National 0 Things You Didn't Know About Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Top 10 Things You Didn't Know About Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory December 6, 2013 - 6:18pm Addthis The photo above is of a cryogenically cooled target in the National Ignition Facility as "seen" by the laser through the hohlraum's laser entrance hole. | Photo courtesy of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The photo above is of a cryogenically cooled target in the National Ignition Facility as "seen" by the laser through the hohlraum's laser entrance hole. | Photo courtesy of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Ben Dotson Ben Dotson Project Coordinator for Digital Reform, Office of Public Affairs What are the key facts? Founded in 1952, Lawrence Livermore National Lab is one of the

175

A Cure for the Valentine's Blues? Livermore Supercomputer Seeks to Mend  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

A Cure for the Valentine's Blues? Livermore Supercomputer Seeks to A Cure for the Valentine's Blues? Livermore Supercomputer Seeks to Mend Broken Hearts A Cure for the Valentine's Blues? Livermore Supercomputer Seeks to Mend Broken Hearts February 14, 2013 - 9:56am Addthis The Cardioid code developed by a team of Livermore and IBM scientists divides the heart into a large number of manageable pieces, or subdomains. The development team used two approaches, called Voronoi (left) and grid (right), to break the enormous computing challenge into much smaller individual tasks. | Photo from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The Cardioid code developed by a team of Livermore and IBM scientists divides the heart into a large number of manageable pieces, or subdomains. The development team used two approaches, called Voronoi (left) and grid

176

Top 10 Things You Didn't Know About Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Top 10 Things You Didn't Know About Lawrence Livermore National Top 10 Things You Didn't Know About Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Top 10 Things You Didn't Know About Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory December 6, 2013 - 6:18pm Addthis The photo above is of a cryogenically cooled target in the National Ignition Facility as "seen" by the laser through the hohlraum's laser entrance hole. | Photo courtesy of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The photo above is of a cryogenically cooled target in the National Ignition Facility as "seen" by the laser through the hohlraum's laser entrance hole. | Photo courtesy of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Ben Dotson Ben Dotson Project Coordinator for Digital Reform, Office of Public Affairs What are the key facts? Founded in 1952, Lawrence Livermore National Lab is one of the

177

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- EA-98-06  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Issued to the University of California related to Criticality Safety and the Quality Assurance Program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, (EA-98-06)

178

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- EA-2000-12  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Issued to the University of California related to Authorization Basis Issues at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, (EA-2000-12)

179

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- EA-2003-04  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Issued to the University of California related to an Extremity Radiological Overexposure at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, (EA-2003-04)

180

Environmental Assessment for The Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA (DOE/EA-1442) (12/02)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environmental Assessment for The Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California December 2002 Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Oakland Operations Office EA for the Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at LLNL ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), has responsibility for national programs to reduce and counter threats from weapons of mass destruction including nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons (bioweapons). NNSA's bioscience work at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in support of these missions requires work with infectious agents, including those historically used for bioweapons.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "lenox livermore maquoketa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Environmental Survey preliminary report, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, California  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report contains the preliminary findings based on the first phase of an Environmental Survey at the Department of Energy (DOE) Sandia National Laboratories Livermore (SNLL), located at Livermore, California. The Survey is being conducted by DOE's Office of Environment, Safety and Health. The SNLL Survey is a portion of the larger, comprehensive DOE Environmental Survey encompassing all major operating facilities of DOE. The DOE Environmental Survey is one of a series of initiatives announced on September 18, 1985, by Secretary of Energy, John S. Herrington, to strengthen the environmental, safety, and health programs and activities within DOE. The purpose of the Environmental Survey is to identify, via a no fault'' baseline Survey of all the Department's major operating facilities, environmental problems and areas of environmental risk. The identified problem areas will be prioritized on a Department-wide basis in order of importance in 1989. The findings in this report are subject to modification based on the results from the Sampling and Analysis Phase of the Survey. The findings are also subject to modification based on comments from the Albuquerque Operations Office concerning the technical accuracy of the findings. The modified preliminary findings and any other appropriate changes will be incorporated into an Interim Report. The Interim Report will serve as the site-specific source for environmental information generated by the Survey, and ultimately as the primary source of information for the DOE-wide prioritization of environmental problems in the Survey Summary Report. 43 refs., 21 figs., 24 tabs.

Not Available

1988-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

182

X-ray holography at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The x-ray holography program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has two principal goals: (1) the development of x-ray diffraction techniques for DNA sequence analysis and (2) the development of x-ray laser holography for structural analysis of intact biological cells and organelles. DNA sequence analysis will be accomplished by applying x-ray diffraction techniques to determine the ensemble average of the sequence of labels along the individual elements of crystalline DNA. X-ray laser holographic imaging will be accomplished by applying three dimensional x-ray holography to elucidate the structure of few hundred angstrom objects such as 300 {Angstrom} chromatin fibers, nuclear pores and nucleic acid replication complexes in living cells. Existing laboratory x-ray lasers will be utilized to produce flash x-ray holograms of the biological structures.

Trebes, J.; Annese, C.; Birdsall, D.; Brase, J.; Gray, J.; Lane, S.; London, R.; Matthews, D.; Peters, D.; Pinkel, D.; Stone, G.; Rapp, D.; Rosen, M.; Weier, U.; Yorkey, T.

1990-10-11T23:59:59.000Z

183

Sandia National Laboratories: Visiting the Livermore Valley Open Campus  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Visiting the LVOC Visiting the LVOC LVOC Home Partnership Opportunities Featured Programs Working at the LVOC Are you a member of the research, business, or academic community who would like to learn more about current and future opportunities at the Livermore Valley Open Campus? We're actively seeking companies, research organizations, universities, and other laboratories with interests in energy, computing, homeland security, and other laboratory mission areas. Request a visit Contact us to explore collaborative opportunities and to discuss a potential visit to the LVOC. We look forward to hearing from you! Map and directions Directions to the LVOC Screen reader users: click here for plain HTML Go to Google Maps Home 37.679620,-121.697112 Loading... Map Sat Ter Did you mean a different:

184

Sandia/California named winner of "Environmental Spirit" Award by Livermore  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

RELEASES RELEASES FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE January 31, 2008 Sandia/California named winner of "Environmental Spirit" Award by Livermore Chamber of Commerce LIVERMORE, Calif. -Sandia National Laboratories' Livermore, Calif., site has been selected by the Livermore Chamber of Commerce as recipient of its inaugural Environmental Spirit Award. The award was presented to Sandia for its environmental programs and ongoing commitment to protecting the environment, wildlife, and numerous species on the laboratory's 400-acre site, says Dale Kaye Chamber president and CEO. "Sandia has not only shown tremendous sensitivity to the land they occupy, but also a dedicated commitment to its community," says Kaye. "This is an organization that helps to protect our world and we are

185

Lawrence Livermore National Laborotory Safety Basis Assessment Final February 11, 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Safety Basis Assessment INTRODUCTION This site visit report documents the collective results of the review of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) safety basis processes and discusses its scope, objective, results and conclusions. Appendix A provides lists of the documents, interviews, and observations and Appendix B includes the plan for the review. This combined assessment was sponsored by the National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA) Livermore Site Office (LSO) and conducted jointly by staff from the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) and LSO. The review was conducted in late 2010 and included site visits from November 29 - December 3, 2010 and December 13-17, 2010. Overall, the LLNL programs

186

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Operational Drill at the B332 Plutonium Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HSS Independent Activity Report - Rev. 0 Report Number: HIAR LLNL-2013-02-27 Site: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Operational Drill at the B332 Plutonium Facility Date of Activity: 02/27/2013 Report Preparer: Thomas Rogers Activity Description/Purpose: The Livermore Site Office (LSO) and Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS) requested personnel from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (HS-45) to observe an operational drill at the Plutonium Facility in Building 332 (B332). LSO and LLNS desired HS-45's participation to help

187

EA-1106: Explosive Waste Treatment Facility at Site 300, Lawrence Livermore  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

106: Explosive Waste Treatment Facility at Site 300, Lawrence 106: Explosive Waste Treatment Facility at Site 300, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, San Joaquin County, California EA-1106: Explosive Waste Treatment Facility at Site 300, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, San Joaquin County, California SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposal to build, permit, and operate the Explosive Waste Treatment Facility to treat explosive waste at the U.S. Department of Energy's Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Experimental Test Site, Site 300. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD April 16, 1996 EA-1106: Finding of No Significant Impact Explosive Waste Treatment Facility at Site 300, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory April 16, 1996

188

Evaluation of HotSpot, Lawerence Livermore National Laboratory - June 11,  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Evaluation of HotSpot, Lawerence Livermore National Laboratory - Evaluation of HotSpot, Lawerence Livermore National Laboratory - June 11, 2010 Evaluation of HotSpot, Lawerence Livermore National Laboratory - June 11, 2010 June 11, 2010 Letter from Andy Lawrence to John Nasstrom accepting the revised Hotspot In your letter dated April 16, 2010, you summarized the work done by the Lawerence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) to meet the Department of Energy's (DOE) recommendations from the 2007, Software Evaluation of HotSpot, and DOE, Safety Software Toolbox Recommendation, for inclusion of V2.07 in the DOE Safety Software Central Registry. Based on this work, you futher requested that HotSpot be included in the DOE Central Registry. Letter from Andy Lawrence to John Nasstrom accepting the revised Hotspot More Documents & Publications

189

Lawrence Livermore National Laborotory Safety Basis Assessment Final February 11, 2011  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Safety Basis Assessment INTRODUCTION This site visit report documents the collective results of the review of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) safety basis processes and discusses its scope, objective, results and conclusions. Appendix A provides lists of the documents, interviews, and observations and Appendix B includes the plan for the review. This combined assessment was sponsored by the National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA) Livermore Site Office (LSO) and conducted jointly by staff from the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) and LSO. The review was conducted in late 2010 and included site visits from November 29 - December 3, 2010 and December 13-17, 2010. Overall, the LLNL programs

190

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- EA-98-01  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Issued to University of California related to the Unplanned Personnel Contaminations and Radioactive Material Intakes at the Hazardous Waste Management Facilities at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, (EA-98-01)

191

EIS-0348: Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplement Stockpile Stewardship and Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This EIS analyzes DOE's decision to continue operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) is critical to National Nuclear Security Administrations Stockpile Stewardship Program and to preventing the spread and use of nuclear weapons worldwide.

192

Parcel Per Parcel Toward A More Refined Carbon Emissions Estimation For Livermore, CA  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

A More Refined Carbon Emissions Estimation For Livermore, CAof lifestyle on carbon emissions in the residential sector [an all-time low in carbon emissions, though most use overall

ivanovi?, Ana

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

193

Livermore Field Office Technical Qualification Program Self Assessment Report, May 31, 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Livermore Field Office Technical Qualification Program Self Assessment Report May 31, 2013 Assessment Team Richard crowe:NNSA NA-SH-80, Team Leader Dan Schwendenman, NNSA NA-SH-50 Carol lngn;:NNSA LFO Facility Operations Approved By: Phll ' F~nt .r/:;,/;.J ~I Date Date Date~/ NNSA Livermore Field Office TQP Self Assessment (NNSA LSO TQP SA) Report Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Methodology ...................................................................................................... 3

194

Inquiry into the De-Inventory of Special Nuclear Material at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, OAS-L-12-11  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Inquiry into the De-Inventory of Special Nuclear Material at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory OAS-L-12-11 September 2012 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 21, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, LIVERMORE SITE OFFICE FROM: David Sedillo Director, Western Audits Division Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Special Report on "Inquiry into the De-Inventory of Special Nuclear Material at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory" BACKGROUND The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore) is a Department of Energy facility managed and operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS), for the Department's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). Livermore's mission is to

195

Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Environmental Remediation at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site 300 Pit 7 Complex  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 9 Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Environmental Remediation at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site 300 Pit 7 Complex January 2007 Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Livermore Site Office EA for the Proposed Environmental Remediation at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site 300 Pit 7 Complex i CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................1 1.2 Purpose and Need for the Action .....................................................................................5

196

Audit of Renovation and New Construction Projects at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, WR-B-97-06  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

THE SECRETARY THE SECRETARY FROM: John C. Layton Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Report on "Audit of Renovation and New Construction Projects at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory" BACKGROUND: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory must periodically renovate existing facilities or build new ones to accomplish its missions or to provide infrastructure to support its missions. The objective of the audit was to determine if Livermore's proposed renovation and new construction projects met mission needs while minimizing the cost to the Government. DISCUSSION: In pursuing three projects, estimated to cost over $78 million, Livermore had not demonstrated that it had selected the

197

Lawrence Livermore, Intel, Cray produce big data machine to serve as  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 1 For immediate release: 11/04/2013 | NR-13-11-01 High Resolution Image Catalyst is a unique high performance computing (HPC) cluster that will serve research scientists and provide a proving ground for new HPC and Big Data technologies and architectures. It was recently installed at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Lawrence Livermore, Intel, Cray produce big data machine to serve as catalyst for next-generation HPC clusters Donald B Johnston, LLNL, (925) 423-4902, johnston19@llnl.gov Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in partnership with Intel and Cray, today announced a unique high performance computing (HPC) cluster that will serve research scientists at all three institutions and provide a proving ground for new HPC and Big Data technologies and architectures.

198

Lawrence Livermore Site Office Safety Basis Self-Assessment Final February 11, 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Livermore Site Office Livermore Site Office Safety Basis Self-Assessment INTRODUCTION This site visit report documents the collective results of the Office of Health, Safety and Security's (HSS) assessment of National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA) Livermore Site Office (LSO) safety basis processes and discusses its scope, objective, results and conclusions. Appendix A provides lists of the documents, interviews, and observations and Appendix B includes the plan for the review. The assessment was sponsored by LSO as a self-assessment and conducted jointly by HSS and LSO staff. It was completed in late 2010 and included site visits from November 29 - December 3, 2010 and December 13-17, 2010. The assessment revealed that LSO has implemented appropriate plans, procedures, and

199

Lawrence Livermore Site Office Safety Basis Self-Assessment Final February 11, 2011  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Livermore Site Office Livermore Site Office Safety Basis Self-Assessment INTRODUCTION This site visit report documents the collective results of the Office of Health, Safety and Security's (HSS) assessment of National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA) Livermore Site Office (LSO) safety basis processes and discusses its scope, objective, results and conclusions. Appendix A provides lists of the documents, interviews, and observations and Appendix B includes the plan for the review. The assessment was sponsored by LSO as a self-assessment and conducted jointly by HSS and LSO staff. It was completed in late 2010 and included site visits from November 29 - December 3, 2010 and December 13-17, 2010. The assessment revealed that LSO has implemented appropriate plans, procedures, and

200

Lawrence Livermore and Cool Earth Solar receive $1.7 million for renewable  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 3 For immediate release: 05/14/2013 | NR-13-05-03 Lawrence Livermore and Cool Earth Solar receive $1.7 million for renewable energy demonstration project Anne M Stark, LLNL, (925) 422-9799, stark8@llnl.gov Printer-friendly The concentrator photovoltaic (CPV) system in the field. Photo courtesy of Cool Earth Inc. High Resolution Image The California Energy Commission (CEC) has awarded $1.7 million to a partnership between Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Cool Earth Solar Inc. (CES) to conduct a community-scale renewable energy integration demonstration project at the Livermore Valley Open Campus. CES is the prime awardee and is contributing an additional $1 million in matching funds to the CEC amount, while LLNL will provide advanced R&D support for the effort.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "lenox livermore maquoketa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Federal Facility Compliance Order, February 24, 1997 Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Facility Compliance Act Order for Lawrence Federal Facility Compliance Act Order for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Compliance Order HWCA 96/97-5002 State California Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) FFCAct Scope Summary Require compliance by the DOE with a Site Treatment Plan for the treatment of mixed waste at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Parties DOE; State of California Environmental Protection Agency (Department of Toxic Substances Control) Date 2/24/1997 SCOPE * Require compliance by the DOE with a Site Treatment Plan for the treatment of mixed waste at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. * Address LDR requirements pertaining to storage and treatment of covered waste at LLNL. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * The Compliance Plan Volume of the STP provides overall schedules for achieving

202

6th US-Russian Pu Science Workshop Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

US-Russian Pu Science Workshop US-Russian Pu Science Workshop Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory University of California, Livermore, California July 14 and 15, 2006 Local Chairs: Michael Fluss, James Tobin, Adam Schwartz LLNL, Livermore, USA Alexander V. Petrovtsev, RFNC * VNIITF, Snezhinsk, Russia Boris A. Nadykto, RFNC * VNIIEF, Sarov, Russia Lidia F. Timofeeva, VNIINM, Moscow, Russia Siegfried S. Hecker, (Luis Morales POC) LANL, Los Alamos, USA Valentin E. Arkhipov, IMP, Ural Branch of RAS, Yekaterinburg, Russia This is a satellite meeting of the "Pu Futures-The Science 2006 International Conference", 9-13 July 2006, Asilomar Conference, Grounds, Pacific Grove Ca. The workshop is hosted by LLNL, under the aegis of the United States/Russian Federation Scientific and Technical Collaboration pursuant

203

Review of the Lawrence Livermore Nationa Laboratory Identiified Defective Department of Transportation Hazardous Material Packages  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 5 Site Visit Report - Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Identified Defective Department of Transportation Hazardous Material Packages This site visit report documents the results of Office of Health, Safety and Security's review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) identification, immediate actions, communications, documentation, evaluation, reporting and follow-up to the discovery of defective Department of Transportation (DOT) UN1A2 55- and 30-gallon open head single bolt closure steel drums intended for storage and transportation of hazardous waste and materials. This review, conducted on January 26-29, 2010, was sponsored by the DOE Livermore Site Office (LSO) to support interface with the lab and this report is intended to support follow-up

204

DOE/EIS-0157-SA-01; Supplement Analysis for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Analysis Analysis S-1 March 1999 Findings ♦ This supplement analysis evaluated a set of new and modified projects and proposals and other new information and concluded that no supplementation of the 1992 EIS/EIR for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), Livermore, is needed. Either the projected impacts are within the bounds of the 1992 EIS/EIR, the impacts were anticipated by mitigation measures established in the 1992 EIS/EIR, or the incremental differences in impacts are not significant. ♦ While proposed increases in administrative limits for radioactive materials at LLNL might slightly increase radiological releases during accidents, the resulting consequences are expected to remain essentially the same as described in the 1992

205

Plutonium discharges to the sanitary sewer: Health impacts at the Livermore Water Reclamation Plant  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) is the largest discharger of sewage treated by the Livermore Water Reclamation (LWRP), contributing approximately 7% by volume of the LWRP influent LILNL operations, as potential sources both of industrial pollutants and radioactivity, are therefore of particular concern to the LWRP. For this reason, LLNL has maintained vigorous wastewater discharge control and monitoring programs. In particular, the monitoring program has demonstrated that, except in a few rare instances, the concentration of contaminants in LLNL effluent have always remained below the appropriate regulatory standards. The exceptions have generally been due to inadvertent discharges of metals-bearing solutions produced by metal plating or cleaning operations.

Balke, B.K.

1993-04-16T23:59:59.000Z

206

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Main Site FFA Under CERCLA Section 120, November 1, 1988 Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Main Site) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Main Site) Federal Facility Agreement Under CERCLA Section 120, November 1, 1988 State California Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, implementing, and monitoring appropriate response actions at the Site Parties DOE; USEPA; California Department of Health Services; California Regional Water Quality Control Board Date 11/1/1988 SCOPE * Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, implementing, and monitoring appropriate response actions at the Site. * Establish a basis for a determination that the DOE has completed remedial action and corrective measures to satisfaction. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES

207

Final Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report for continued operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore. Volume 4, Comments and responses  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR) is prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This document analyzes the potential environmental impacts of the proposed action: continued operation, including near-term (within 5 to 10 years) proposed projects, of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore (SNL, Livermore). Additionally, this document analyzes a no action alternative involving continuing operations at FY 1992 funding levels without further growth, a modification of operations alternative to reduce adverse environmental impacts of operations or facilities, and a shutdown and decommissioning alternative of UC discontinuing its management of LLNL after the current contract expires on September 30, 1992. This document assesses the environmental impacts of the Laboratories` operations on air and water quality, geological and ecological systems, occupational and public health risks, prehistoric and historic resources, endangered species, floodplains and wetlands, socioeconomic resources, hazardous waste management, site contamination, and other environmental issues. The EIS/EIR is divided into five volumes and two companion reports. This volume contains copies of the written comments and transcripts of individual statements at the public hearing and the responses to them.

Not Available

1992-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

208

Final Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report for continued operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore. Volume 1, Text  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR) is prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This document analyzes the potential environmental impacts of the proposed action: continued operation, including near-term (within 5 to 10 years) proposed projects, of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore (SNL, Livermore). Additionally, this document analyzes a no action alternative involving continuing operations at FY 1992 funding levels without further growth, a modification of operations alternative to reduce adverse environmental impacts of operations or facilities, and a shutdown and decommissioning alternative of UC discontinuing its management of LLNL after the current contract expires on September 30, 1992. This document assesses the environmental impacts of the Laboratories` operations on air and water quality, geological and ecological systems, occupational and public health risks, prehistoric and historic resources, endangered species, floodplains and wetlands, socioeconomic resources, hazardous waste management, site contamination, and other environmental issues. The EIS/EIR is divided into five volumes and two companion reports. This volume contains the Final EIS/EIR, which in part relies on the detailed information in the appendices, and comprehensively discusses the proposed action, the alternatives, and the existing conditions and impacts of the proposed action and the alternatives.

Not Available

1992-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

209

Final Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report for continued operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore. Volume 3, Appendices F--M  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR) is prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This document analyzes the potential environmental impacts of the proposed action: continued operation, including near-term (within 5 to 10 years) proposed projects, of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore (SNL, Livermore). Additionally, this document analyzes a no action alternative involving continuing operations at FY 1992 funding levels without further growth, a modification of operations alternative to reduce adverse environmental impacts of operations or facilities, and a shutdown and decommissioning alternative of UC discontinuing its management of LLNL after the current contract expires on September 30, 1992. This document assesses the environmental impacts of the Laboratories` operations on air and water quality, geological and ecological systems, occupational and public health risks, prehistoric and historic resources, endangered species, floodplains and wetlands, socioeconomic resources, hazardous waste management, site contamination, and other environmental issues. The EIS/EIR is divided into five volumes and two companion reports. This volume contains the Final EIS/EIR technical appendices F through M. Appendix L has been revised to reflect public information activities since publication of the Draft EIS/EIR. These appendices provide technical support for the analyses in Volume 1 and also provide additional information and references.

Not Available

1992-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

210

Final Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report for continued operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore. Executive summary  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy (DOE) and the Regents of the University of California (UC) propose the continued operation, including near-term proposed projects, of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). In addition, DOE proposes the continued operation, including near-term proposed projects, of Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore (SNL, Livermore). Continued operation plus proposed projects at the two Laboratories is needed so that the research and development missions established by Congress and the President can continue to be supported. As provided and encouraged by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), DOE and UC have prepared this document as a joint Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to analyze the impacts of the proposed action. In addition, this document discusses a no action alternative for continuing operations at FY 1992 funding levels without further growth, a modification of operations alternative focused on specific adverse environmental impacts of operations or facilities, and a shutdown and decommissioning alternative. This document also examines the alternative of UC discontinuing its management of LLNL after the current contract expires on September 30, 1992. The environmental documentation process provides information to the public, government agencies, and decision makers about the environmental impacts of implementing the proposed and alternative actions. In addition, this environmental documentation identifies alternatives and possible ways to reduce or prevent environmental impacts. A list of the issues raised through the EIS/EIR scoping process is presented.

Not Available

1992-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

211

Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report for continued operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore. Volume 2, Appendices A--D  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR) is prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This document analyzes the potential environmental impacts of the proposed action: continued operation, including near-term (within 5 to 10 years) proposed projects, of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore (SNL, Livermore). Additionally, this document analyzes a no action alternative involving continuing operations at FY 1992 funding levels without further growth, a modification of operations alternative to reduce adverse environmental impacts of operations or facilities, and a shutdown and decommissioning alternative of UC discontinuing its management of LLNL after the current contract expires on September 30, 1992. This document assesses the environmental impacts of the Laboratories` operations on air and water quality, geological and ecological systems, occupational and public health risks, prehistoric and historic resources, endangered species, floodplains and wetlands, socioeconomic resources, hazardous waste management, site contamination, and other environmental issues. The EIS/EIR is divided into five volumes and two companion reports. This volume contains the Final EIS/EIR technical appendices which provide technical support for the analyses in Volume 1 and also provide additional information and references.

Not Available

1992-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

212

This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344 LLNL Vulcan TAW Helen Trident Texas Vulcan PW LULI 2000 TITAN Gekko XII FIREX I NIF ARC Quad OMEGA EP PETAL

213

This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344 LLNL States of Matter ­ FI Advanced Concepts Exploration ­ Virtual Lab for Technology ITER NIF Burning Plasma

214

LabUPDATE ISSUE 7 JUNE 11, 2003 News about the Berkeley, Livermore and Los Alamos national laboratories,  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

: The National Ignition Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has produced a record energy levelLabUPDATE ISSUE 7 ­ JUNE 11, 2003 News about the Berkeley, Livermore and Los Alamos national technical goals. "Full NIF equivalent" performance (extrapolating the single beam output to the 192 beams

Knowles, David William

215

Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, September 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Oversight Review of Oversight Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory September 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................... 1 4.0 Summary of Results ............................................................................................................... 1

216

Independent Oversight Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at the Livermore Site Office, October 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Enforcement and Oversight Independent Oversight Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at the Livermore Site Office October 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Scope ................................................................................................................................................ 1

217

Independent Oversight Review of the Fire Protection Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, September 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Fire Protection Program at Fire Protection Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory May 2011 February 2013 September 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U. S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 1 3.0 Scope ....................................................................................................................................................... 2

218

Independent Oversight Review of the Fire Protection Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, September 2013  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Fire Protection Program at Fire Protection Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory May 2011 February 2013 September 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U. S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 1 3.0 Scope ....................................................................................................................................................... 2

219

Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, September 2011  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Oversight Review of Oversight Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory September 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................... 1 4.0 Summary of Results ............................................................................................................... 1

220

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for continued operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, required by the California Environmental Quality Act, was developed by UC as part of the Final EIS/EIR process. This document describing the program is a companion to the Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR) for the Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore (SNL, Livermore). The Final EIS/EIR analyzes the potential environmental impacts of the proposed action, which for the purposes of NEPA is: continued operation, including near-term (within 5 to 1 0 years) proposed projects, of LLNL and SNL, Livermore. The proposed action for the EIR is the renewal of the contract between DOE and UC for UC`s continued operation and management of LLNL. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is for implementing and monitoring progress of measures taken to mitigate the significant impacts of the proposed action. A complete description of the impacts and proposed mitigations is in Section 5 of Volume I of the Final EIS/EIR. This report summarizes the mitigation measures, identifies the responsible party at the Laboratory for implementing the mitigation measure, states when monitoring will be implemented, when the mitigation measure will be in place and monitoring completed, and who will verify that the mitigation measure was implemented.

Not Available

1992-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "lenox livermore maquoketa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Electromechanical battery research and development at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The concepts undergirding a funded program to develop a modular electromechanical battery (EMB) at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory are described. Example parameters for EMBs for electric and hybrid-electric vehicles are given, and the importance of the high energy recovery efficiency of EMBs in increasing vehicle range in urban driving is shown.

Post, R.F.; Baldwin, D.E.; Bender, D.A.; Fowler, T.K.

1993-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

222

Lawrence Livermore wins six R&D Awards for science, technological  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6-08 6-08 For immediate release: 06/20/2012 | NR-12-06-08 Lawrence Livermore wins six R&D Awards for science, technological innovation Lynda L Seaver, LLNL, (925) 423-3103, seaver1@llnl.gov Printer-friendly Natalia Zaitseva, an LLNL materials scientist, leads a team of Livermore researchers that has developed the first plastic material capable of efficiently distinguishing neutrons from gamma rays, something not thought possible for the past five decades or so. See video. Photo by Jacqueline McBride High Resolution Image The vertical cross-section of the "snowflake" region of an experimental tokamak TCV in Switzerland. The left panel shows broad spreading of the exhaust plasma, and the right shows the snowflake-shaped magnetic field lines (six branches, counting the two directed upward) near the magnetic

223

Livermore scientists assist in solving riddle of black hole spin | National  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

scientists assist in solving riddle of black hole spin | National scientists assist in solving riddle of black hole spin | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > NNSA Blog > Livermore scientists assist in solving riddle of ... Livermore scientists assist in solving riddle of black hole spin Posted By Office of Public Affairs NNSA Blog

224

Livermore scientists assist in solving riddle of black hole spin | National  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

scientists assist in solving riddle of black hole spin | National scientists assist in solving riddle of black hole spin | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > NNSA Blog > Livermore scientists assist in solving riddle of ... Livermore scientists assist in solving riddle of black hole spin Posted By Office of Public Affairs NNSA Blog

225

Lawrence Livermore charitable campaign raises $3.3 million for local  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

charitable campaign raises $3.3 million for local charitable campaign raises $3.3 million for local organizations | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > NNSA Blog > Lawrence Livermore charitable campaign raises $3.3 million ... Lawrence Livermore charitable campaign raises $3.3 million for local organizations Posted By Office of Public Affairs

226

Environmental monitoring at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: 1986 annual report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents the results of the environmental monitoring program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) for 1986. To evaluate the effect of LLNL operations on the local environment, measurements of direct radiation and a variety of radionuclides and chemical pollutants in ambient air, soil, surface water, groundwater, vegetation, milk, foodstuff, and sewage effluents were made at both the Livermore site and nearby Site 300. This report was prepared to meet the requirements of DOE Order 5484.1. Evaluations are made of LLNL's compliance with all applicable guides, standards, and limits for radiological and nonradiological releases to the environment. The data indicate that no releases in excess of the applicable standards were made during 1986, and that LLNL operations had no adverse environmental impact.

Holland, R.C.; Buddemeier, R.W.; Brekke, D.D.

1987-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

227

Environmental monitoring at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: Annual report, 1987  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents the results of the Environmental Monitoring Program at the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory (LLNL) for 1987. To evaluate the effect of LLNL operations on the local environment, measurements were made of direct radiation and a variety of radionuclides and chemical pollutants in ambient air, soil, sewage effluents, surface water, groundwater, vegetation, foodstuff, and milk at both the Livermore site and nearby Site 300. Evaluations were made of LLNL's compliance with the applicable guides, standards, and limits for radiological and nonradiological releases to the environment. The data indicates that the only releases in excess of applicable standards were four releases to the sanitary sewer. LLNL operations had no adverse impact on the environment during 1987. 65 refs., 24 figs.

Holland, R.C.; Brekke, D.D.

1988-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

228

Livermore scientist, engineers train to be inspectors for test ban treaty  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

scientist, engineers train to be inspectors for test ban treaty scientist, engineers train to be inspectors for test ban treaty organization | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > NNSA Blog > Livermore scientist, engineers train to be inspectors ... Livermore scientist, engineers train to be inspectors for test ban treaty organization

229

Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, July 2013  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Independent Oversight Review of Independent Oversight Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory May 2011 July 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose................................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Scope................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background ......................................................................................................................................... 2

230

Development of a Novel Depleted Uranium Treatment Process at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A three-stage process was developed at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory to treat potentially pyrophoric depleted uranium metal wastes. The three-stage process includes waste sorting/rinsing, acid dissolution of the waste metal with a hydrochloric and phosphoric acid solution, and solidification of the neutralized residuals from the second stage with clay. The final product is a solid waste form that can be transported to and disposed of at a permitted low-level radioactive waste disposal site.

Gates-Anderson, D; Bowers, J; Laue, C; Fitch, T

2007-01-22T23:59:59.000Z

231

Lenox, New York: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

011°, -75.7043506° 011°, -75.7043506° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":43.0584011,"lon":-75.7043506,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

232

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Federal Facility Agreement, June 29, 1992 Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Site 300) Site 300) Agreement Name Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Federal Facility Agreement Under CERCLA Section 120, June 29, 1992 State California Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, implementing, and monitoring appropriate response actions at the Site Parties DOE; USEPA; California Department of Toxic Substances Control; Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board Date 6/29/1992 SCOPE * Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, implementing, and monitoring appropriate response actions at the Site. * Identify operable units (OUs) which are appropriate at the Site prior to the implementation of final remedial action(s).

233

Signal and Image Processing Research at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is a large, multidisciplinary institution that conducts fundamental and applied research in the physical sciences. Research programs at the Laboratory run the gamut from theoretical investigations, to modeling and simulation, to validation through experiment. Over the years, the Laboratory has developed a substantial research component in the areas of signal and image processing to support these activities. This paper surveys some of the current research in signal and image processing at the Laboratory. Of necessity, the paper does not delve deeply into any one research area, but an extensive citation list is provided for further study of the topics presented.

Roberts, R S; Poyneer, L A; Kegelmeyer, L M; Carrano, C J; Chambers, D H; Candy, J V

2009-06-29T23:59:59.000Z

234

Construction quality assurance for Pit 6 landfill closure, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Site 300  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Golder Construction Services, Inc. (GCS), under contract to the Regents of the University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), provided the construction quality assurance (CQA) observation and testing during the construction of the Site 300, Pit 6 landfill closure cover. The cap construction was performed as a CERCLA non-time-critical removal action from June 2 to August 29, 1997. the project site is located 18 miles east of Livermore on Tesla Road and approximately 10 miles southwest of Tracy on Corral Hollow Road in San Joaquin County, California. This report certifies that the LLNL, Site 300, Pit 6, Landfill Closure was constructed in accordance with the construction specifications and design drawings. This report documents construction activities and CQA monitoring and testing for construction of the Pit 6 Landfill Closure. Golder Associates, Inc. of Oakland, California was the design engineering firm responsible for preparation of the drawings and specifications. CQA services were provided by GCS, of Roseville, California, under supervision of a California registered civil Engineer.

NONE

1997-10-30T23:59:59.000Z

235

GAO-04-986R Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: Further Improvements Needed to Strengthen Controls Over the Purchase Card Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6R LLNL Purchase Card Controls 6R LLNL Purchase Card Controls United States Government Accountability Office Washington, DC 20548 August 6, 2004 Congressional Requesters Subject: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: Further Improvements Needed to Strengthen Controls Over the Purchase Card Program The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) located in Livermore, California is a government-owned, contractor-operated national laboratory of the Department of Energy's (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). 1 The University of California manages the lab under a cost-reimbursable contract with NNSA. The university is paid a management fee to operate the lab and is reimbursed for all allowable costs charged to the contract. During the fall of 2002, the Federal Bureau of Investigation began investigating two

236

Type B accident investigation board report of the July 2, 1997 curium intake by shredder operator at Building 513 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California. Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

On July 2, 1997 at approximately 6:00 A.M., two operators (Workers 1 and 2), wearing approved personal protective equipment (PPE), began a shredding operation of HEPA filters for volume reduction in Building 513 (B-513) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). The waste requisitions indicated they were shredding filters containing {le} 1 {micro}Ci of americium-241 (Am-241). A third operator (Worker 3) provided support to the shredder operators in the shredding area (hot area) from a room that was adjacent to the shredding area (cold area). At Approximately 8:00 A.M., a fourth operator (Worker 4) relieved Worker 2 in the shredding operation. Sometime between 8:30 A.M. and 9:00 A.M., Worker 3 left the cold area to make a phone call and set off a hand and foot counter in Building 514. Upon discovering the contamination, the shredding operation was stopped and surveys were conducted in the shredder area. Surveys conducted on the workers found significant levels of contamination on their PPE and the exterior of their respirator cartridges. An exit survey of Worker 1 was conducted at approximately 10:05 A.M., and found contamination on his PPE, as well as on the exterior and interior of his respirator. Contamination was also found on his face, chest, back of neck, hair, knees, and mustache. A nose blow indicated significant contamination, which was later determined to be curium-244.

NONE

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

237

Livermore, Los Alamos Team for Artificial Retina Project to Help Restore Vision for Many  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 9 6 www.federallabs.org Livermore, Los Alamos Team for Artificial Retina Project to Help Restore Vision for Many signals in the eye that the brain uses to create a visual image. As a core member of the team, Los Alamos National Laboratory is developing and applying techniques for the functional imaging of physiological and prosthetic stimulation in neural tissue to characterize information encoding and processing by the retina and to validate the efficacy of electrical stimulation. Coupled experimental studies and computer simulations are being used to investigate the biophysical and physiological properties of retinal neuronal tissue. In clinical trials, patients with vision loss were able to successfully identify objects, increase mobility, and

238

High Energy, Short Pulse Fiber Injection Lasers at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A short pulse fiber injection laser for the Advanced Radiographic Capability (ARC) on the National Ignition Facility (NIF) has been developed at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). This system produces 100 {micro}J pulses with 5 nm of bandwidth centered at 1053 nm. The pulses are stretched to 2.5 ns and have been recompressed to sub-ps pulse widths. A key feature of the system is that the pre-pulse power contrast ratio exceeds 80 dB. The system can also precisely adjust the final recompressed pulse width and timing and has been designed for reliable, hands free operation. The key challenges in constructing this system were control of the signal to noise ratio, dispersion management and managing the impact of self phase modulation on the chirped pulse.

Dawson, J W; Messerly, M J; Phan, H H; Crane, J K; Beach, R J; Siders, C W; Barty, C J

2008-09-10T23:59:59.000Z

239

Title I conceptual design for Pit 6 landfill closure at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site 300  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The objective of this design project is to evaluate and prepare design and construction documents for a closure cover cap for the Pit 6 Landfill located at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site 300. This submittal constitutes the Title I Design (Conceptual Design) for the closure cover of the Pit 6 Landfill. A Title I Design is generally 30 percent of the design effort. Title H Design takes the design to 100 percent complete. Comments and edits to this Title I Design will be addressed in the Title II design submittal. Contents of this report are as follows: project background; design issues and engineering approach; design drawings; calculation packages; construction specifications outline; and construction quality assurance plan outline.

MacDonnell, B.A.; Obenauf, K.S. [Golder Associates, Inc., Alameda, CA (United States)

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

240

Allocation of Direct and Indirect Costs … Cost Accounting Standard 418 … at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, OAS-L-13-07  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Allocation of Direct and Indirect Allocation of Direct and Indirect Costs - Cost Accounting Standard 418 - at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory OAS-L-13-07 April 2013 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 April 11, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, LIVERMORE SITE OFFICE FROM: Rickey R. Hass Deputy Inspector General for Audits and Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on the "Allocation of Direct and Indirect Costs - Cost Accounting Standard 418 - at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory" BACKGROUND The attached report presents the results of the audit of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (Livermore) Allocation of Direct and Indirect Costs - Cost Accounting Standard 418, conducted to address the performance audit objective described below. The Office of

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "lenox livermore maquoketa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Lawrence Livermore: News and Public Affairs: News and Media: NR-04-02-01  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Social Media Logos Follow LLNL on YouTube Subscribe to LLNL's RSS feed Follow LLNL on Facebook Follow LLNL on Twitter Follow LLNL on Flickr Social Media Logos Follow LLNL on YouTube Subscribe to LLNL's RSS feed Follow LLNL on Facebook Follow LLNL on Twitter Follow LLNL on Flickr Contact: Anne M. Stark Phone:(925) 422-9799 E-mail: stark8@llnl.gov FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Date: February 2, 2004 NR-04-02-01 Livermore Scientists Team With Russia To Discover Elements 113 and 115 A calcium-48 ion is accelerated to a high velocity in a cyclotron and directed at an americium-243 target. (300 dpi) One of the numerous americium-243 target atoms with a nucleus of protons and neutrons surrounded by an electron cloud. (300 dpi) An accelerated calcium-48 ion and an americium-243 target atom just before they collide. (300 dpi) The moment of collision between an accelerated calcium-48 ion and an americium-243 target atom.

242

Routine environmental audit of the Sandia National Laboratories, California, Livermore, California  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents the results of the Routine Environmental Audit of the Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, California (SNL/CA). During this audit the activities the Audit Team conducted included reviews of internal documents and reports from preview audits and assessments; interviews with US Department of Energy (DOE), State of California regulators, and contractor personnel; and inspections and observations of selected facilities and operations. The onsite portion of the audit was conducted from February 22 through March 4, 1994, by the DOE Office of Environmental Audit (EH-24), located within the Office of Environment, Safety, and Health (EH). The audit evaluated the status of programs to ensure compliance with Federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations; compliance with DOE Orders, guidance, and directives; and conformance with accepted industry practices and standards of performance. The audit also evaluated the status and adequacy of the management systems developed to address environmental requirements. The audit`s functional scope was comprehensive and included all areas of environmental management and a programmatic evaluation of NEPA and inactive waste sites.

Not Available

1994-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

243

Research on ambient temperature passive magnetic bearings at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Research performed at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory on the equilibrium and stability of a new class of ambient-temperature passive bearing systems is described. The basic concepts involved are: (1) Stability of the rotating system is only achieved in the rotating state. That is, disengaging mechanical systems are used to insure stable levitation at rest (when Earnshaw`s theorem applies). (2) Stable levitation by passive magnetic elements can be achieved if the vector sum of the force derivatives of the several elements of the system is net negative (i.e. restoring) for axial, transverse, and tilt-type perturbations from equilibrium. To satisfy the requirements of (2) using only permanent magnet elements we have employed periodic ``Halbach arrays.`` These interact with passive inductive loaded circuits and act as stabilizers, with the primary forces arising from axially symmetric permanent-magnet elements. Stabilizers and other elements needed to create compact passive magnetic bearing systems have been constructed. Novel passive means for stabilizing classes of rotor-dynamic instabilities in such systems have also been investigated.

Post, R.F.; Ryitov, D.D.` Smith, J.R.; Tung, L.S.

1997-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

244

Screening Program Reduced Melanoma Mortality at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 1984-1996  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Worldwide incidence of cutaneous malignant melanoma has increased substantially, and no screening program has yet demonstrated reduction in mortality. We evaluated the education, self examination and targeted screening campaign at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) from its beginning in July 1984 through 1996. The thickness and crude incidence of melanoma from the years before the campaign were compared to those obtained during the 13 years of screening. Melanoma mortality during the 13-year period was based on a National Death Index search. Expected yearly deaths from melanoma among LLNL employees were calculated by using California mortality data matched by age, sex, and race/ethnicity and adjusted to exclude deaths from melanoma diagnosed before the program began or before employment at LLNL. After the program began, crude incidence of melanoma thicker than 0.75 mm decreased from 18 to 4 cases per 100,000 person-years (p = 0.02), while melanoma less than 0.75mm remained stable and in situ melanoma increased substantially. No eligible melanoma deaths occurred among LLNL employees during the screening period compared with a calculated 3.39 expected deaths (p = 0.034). Education, self examination and selective screening for melanoma at LLNL significantly decreased incidence of melanoma thicker than 0.75 mm and reduced the melanoma-related mortality rate to zero. This significant decrease in mortality rate persisted for at least 3 yr after employees retired or otherwise left the laboratory.

Schneider, MD, J S; II, PhD, D; MD, PhD, M

2006-10-12T23:59:59.000Z

245

Waste minimization at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: A case study of environmentally conscious manufacturing  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this paper is to provide an update on what we`ve accomplished and have planned in our plating operation at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in the area of waste minimization. Our efforts have included issues other than waste minimization and, therefore, fall under the wider umbrella entitled pollution prevention or environmentally conscious electroplating. Approximately one year has passed since our last report on pollution prevention and since this topic remains a high-effort activity much more has been accomplished. Our efforts to date fall under the first two generation categories of waste reduction. Good housekeeping practices, inventory control, and minor changes in operating practices (first generation) resulted in an impressive amount of waste reduction. In the second generation of waste reduction, current technology, separation technologies, and material substitutions were used to reduce emission and wastes. The third generation of improvements requires significant technological advances in process synthesis and engineering. We are presently starting some projects in this third generation phase and these will be discussed at the end of this paper.

Steffani, C.P.; Dini, J.W.

1994-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

246

Summary Report of Summer 2009 NGSI Human Capital Development Efforts at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In 2009, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) engaged in several activities to support NA-24's Next Generation Safeguards Initiative (NGSI). This report outlines LLNL's efforts to support Human Capital Development (HCD), one of five key components of NGSI managed by Dunbar Lockwood in the Office of International Regimes and Agreements (NA-243). There were five main LLNL summer safeguards HCD efforts sponsored by NGSI: (1) A joint Monterey Institute of International Studies/Center for Nonproliferation Studies-LLNL International Safeguards Policy and Information Analysis Course; (2) A Summer Safeguards Policy Internship Program at LLNL; (3) A Training in Environmental Sample Analysis for IAEA Safeguards Internship; (4) Safeguards Technology Internships; and (5) A joint LLNL-INL Summer Safeguards Lecture Series. In this report, we provide an overview of these five initiatives, an analysis of lessons learned, an update on the NGSI FY09 post-doc, and an update on students who participated in previous NGSI-sponsored LLNL safeguards HCD efforts.

Dougan, A; Dreicer, M; Essner, J; Gaffney, A; Reed, J; Williams, R

2009-11-16T23:59:59.000Z

247

Overview of crash and impact analysis at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This work provides a brief overview of past and ongoing efforts at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in the area of finite-element modeling of crash and impact problems. The process has been one of evolution in several respects. One aspect of the evolution has been the continual upgrading and refinement of the DYNA, NIKE, and TOPAZ family of finite-element codes. The major missions of these codes involve problems where the dominant factors are high-rate dynamics, quasi-statics, and heat transfer, respectively. However, analysis of a total event, whether it be a shipping container drop or an automobile/barrier collision, may require use or coupling or two or more of these codes. Along with refinements in speed, contact capability, and element technology, material model complexity continues to evolve as more detail is demanded from the analyses. A more recent evolution has involved the mix of problems addressed at LLNL and the direction of the technology thrusts. A pronounced increase in collaborative efforts with the civilian and private sector has resulted in a mix of complex problems involving synergism between weapons applications (shipping container, earth penetrator, missile carrier, ship hull damage) and a more broad base of problems such as vehicle impacts as discussed herein.

Logan, R.W.; Tokarz, F.J.

1993-08-05T23:59:59.000Z

248

Cancer risks from soil emissions of volatile organic compounds at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The emission isolation flux chamber (EIFC) methodology was applied to Superfund investigations at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site 300 to determine if on-site workers were exposed to VOCs volatilizing from the subsurface and what, if any, health risks could be attributed to the inhalation of the VOCs volatilizing from the subsurface. During July and August of 1996, twenty, eighteen, and twenty six VOC soil vapor flux samples were collected in the Building 830, 832, and 854 areas, respectively using EIFCS. The VOC concentrations in the vapor samples were used to calculate soil flux rates which were used as input into an air dispersion model to calculate ambient air exposure-point concentrations. The exposure-point concentrations were compared to EPA Region IX Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRGs). Buildings 830 and 832 exposure-point concentrations were less then the PRGs therefore no cancer risks were calculated. The cancer risks for Building 854 ranged from 1.6 x 10{sup -7} to 2.1 x 10{sup -6}. The resultant inhalation cancer risks were all within the acceptable range, implying that on-site workers were not exposed to VOC vapors volatilizing from the subsurface soil that could have significant cancer risks. Therefore remediation in these areas would not be necessary.

Dibley, V. R., LLNL

1998-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

249

SI Handbook for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: Committee on metric transition  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Handbook is a guide to the use of the International System of Units (SI) at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. It describes the reasons for the United States converting to the metric system, legislation related to metric conversion, why the Laboratory is converting to the metric system, how international standards are established, the structure of SI, rules for using SI units and symbols, allowable non-SI units, and other important information about SI units and international standards. This handbook also demonstrates techniques for converting between inch-pound and metric units, and it contains tables of conversion factors. This Handbook is intended for the person who needs a practical working knowledge of the units of the modernized metric system, SI. The text and figures will be useful also to those who have had some experience with the metric system and want to update their knowledge, as well as to all who are interested in overcoming the normal human tendency to dislike a new system that they do not understand. The material is presented with the intent to implant the awareness of the simplifications possible with the new units, to warn of potential pitfalls associated with their use, and to guide in the recognition of which metric units and practices are correct. The text and figures are organized for ease of orientation. The sequence of units follows the natural progression from the everyday topics to the specialized ones.

NONE

1995-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

250

Results of Surveys for Special Status Reptiles at the Site 300 Facilities of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to present the results of a live-trapping and visual surveys for special status reptiles at the Site 300 Facilities of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). The survey was conducted under the authority of the Federal recovery permit of Swaim Biological Consulting (PRT-815537) and a Memorandum of Understanding issued from the California Department of Fish and Game. Site 300 is located between Livermore and Tracy just north of Tesla road (Alameda County) and Corral Hollow Road (San Joaquin County) and straddles the Alameda and San Joaquin County line (Figures 1 and 2). It encompasses portions of the USGS 7.5 minute Midway and Tracy quadrangles (Figure 2). Focused surveys were conducted for four special status reptiles including the Alameda whipsnake (Masticophis lateralis euryxanthus), the San Joaquin Whipsnake (Masticophis Hagellum ruddock), the silvery legless lizard (Anniella pulchra pulchra), and the California horned lizard (Phrynosoma coronanum frontale).

Woollett, J J

2008-09-18T23:59:59.000Z

251

Investigating Sources of Toxicity in Stormwater: Algae Mortality in Runoff Upstream of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A source evaluation case study is presented for observations of algae toxicity in an intermittent stream passing through the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory near Livermore, California. A five-step procedure is discussed to determine the cause of water toxicity problems and to determine appropriate environmental management practices. Using this approach, an upstream electrical transfer station was identified as the probable source of herbicides causing the toxicity. In addition, an analytical solution for solute transport in overland flow was used to estimate the application level of 40 Kg/ha. Finally, this source investigation demonstrates that pesticides can impact stream water quality regardless of application within levels suggested on manufacturer labels. Environmental managers need to ensure that pesticides that could harm aquatic organisms (including algae) not be used within close proximity to streams or storm drainages and that application timing should be considered for environmental protection.

Campbell, C G; Folks, K; Mathews, S; Martinelli, R

2003-10-06T23:59:59.000Z

252

Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics (IGPP), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL): Quinquennial report, November 14-15, 1996  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Quinquennial Review Report of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) branch of the Institute for Geophysics and Planetary Physics (IGPP) provides an overview of IGPP-LLNL, its mission, and research highlights of current scientific activities. This report also presents an overview of the University Collaborative Research Program (UCRP), a summary of the UCRP Fiscal Year 1997 proposal process and the project selection list, a funding summary for 1993-1996, seminars presented, and scientific publications. 2 figs., 3 tabs.

Tweed, J.

1996-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

253

Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore Environmental Protection Implementation Plan for the period November 9, 1991--November 9, 1992  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Sandia National Laboratories, as part of the DOE complex, is committed to full compliance with all applicable environmental laws and regulations. This Environmental Protection Implementation Plan (EPIP) is intended to ensure that the environmental program objectives of DOE Order 5400.1 are achieved at SNL, Livermore. The EPIP will serve as an aid to management and staff to implement these new programs in a timely manner. 23 refs., 4 figs., 1 tab.

Not Available

1991-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

254

Serving the Nation for Fifty Years: 1952 - 2002 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [LLNL], Fifty Years of Accomplishments  

DOE R&D Accomplishments [OSTI]

For 50 years, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has been making history and making a difference. The outstanding efforts by a dedicated work force have led to many remarkable accomplishments. Creative individuals and interdisciplinary teams at the Laboratory have sought breakthrough advances to strengthen national security and to help meet other enduring national needs. The Laboratory's rich history includes many interwoven stories -- from the first nuclear test failure to accomplishments meeting today's challenges. Many stories are tied to Livermore's national security mission, which has evolved to include ensuring the safety, security, and reliability of the nation's nuclear weapons without conducting nuclear tests and preventing the proliferation and use of weapons of mass destruction. Throughout its history and in its wide range of research activities, Livermore has achieved breakthroughs in applied and basic science, remarkable feats of engineering, and extraordinary advances in experimental and computational capabilities. From the many stories to tell, one has been selected for each year of the Laboratory's history. Together, these stories give a sense of the Laboratory -- its lasting focus on important missions, dedication to scientific and technical excellence, and drive to made the world more secure and a better place to live.

2002-00-00T23:59:59.000Z

255

Low-Level Plutonium Bioassay Measurements at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Plutonium-239 ({sup 239}Pu) and plutonium-240 ({sup 240}Pu) are important alpha emitting radionuclides contained in radioactive debris from nuclear weapons testing. {sup 239}Pu and {sup 240}Pu are long-lived radionuclides with half-lives of 24,400 years and 6580 years, respectively. Concerns over human exposure to plutonium stem from knowledge about the persistence of plutonium isotopes in the environment and the high relative effectiveness of alpha-radiation to cause potential harm to cells once incorporated into the human body. In vitro bioassay tests have been developed to assess uptakes of plutonium based on measured urinary excretion patterns and modeled metabolic behaviors of the absorbed radionuclides. Systemic plutonium absorbed by the deep lung or from the gastrointestinal tract after ingestion is either excreted or distributed to other organs, primarily to the liver and skeleton, where it is retained for biological half-times of around 20 and 50 years, respectively. Dose assessment and atoll rehabilitation programs in the Marshall Islands have historically given special consideration to residual concentrations of plutonium in the environment even though the predicted dose from inhalation and/or ingestion of plutonium accounts for less than 5% of the annual effective dose from exposure to fallout contamination. Scientists from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) have developed a state-of-the-art bioassay test to assess urinary excretion rates of plutonium from Marshallese populations. This new heavy-isotope measurement system is based on Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS). The AMS system at LLNL far exceeds the standard measurement requirements established under the latest United States Department of Energy (DOE) regulation, 10CFR 835, for occupational monitoring of plutonium, and offers several advantages over classical as well as competing new technologies for low-level detection and measurement of plutonium isotopes. The United States National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has independently verified the accuracy and precision of the AMS detection system for low-level bioassay measurements of plutonium isotopes through participation in an intercomparison exercise whereby performance evaluation samples were prepared in a synthetic urine matrix and submitted to participating laboratories for blind analysis. The results of the analyses were then sent to the NIST to independently evaluate the performance of laboratory participants. At LLNL, the AMS measurements of {sup 239}Pu and {sup 240}Pu met ANSI 13.30 criteria for both precision and accuracy at all sample test levels. Livermore scientists continue to test the performance of the Marshall Islands Plutonium Urinalysis Program by routine blind analysis of externally prepared quality control test samples, and through the rigorous implementation of standardized methods and procedures. Although not addressed directly in the report, AMS measurements show that the urinary excretion of plutonium by selected Marshallese populations fall into a low and reproducible range. Moreover, there appears to be no evidence of small incremental intakes of plutonium associated with resettlement activities - past or present. The improved quality, reliability and detection sensitivity of AMS for low-level plutonium isotope measurements will enable DOE to develop high-quality, baseline urinary excretion data for Marshallese populations, and accurately assess and track potential uptakes of plutonium. associated with resettlement activities and/or from long-term changes in plutonium exposure conditions in the Marshall Islands.

Hamilton, T; Brown, T; Hickman, D; Marchetti, A; Williams, R; Kehl, S

2007-06-18T23:59:59.000Z

256

Geomechanical Simulations of CO2 Storage Integrity using the Livermore Distinct Element Method  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Large-scale carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) projects involving annual injections of millions of tons of CO{sub 2} are a key infrastructural element needed to substantially reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The large rate and volume of injection will induce pressure and stress gradients within the formation that could activate existing fractures and faults, or drive new fractures through the caprock. We will present results of an ongoing investigation to identify conditions that will activate existing fractures/faults or make new fractures within the caprock using the Livermore Distinct Element Code (LDEC). LDEC is a multiphysics code, developed at LLNL, capable of simulating dynamic fracture of rock masses under a range of conditions. As part of a recent project, LDEC has been extended to consider fault activation and dynamic fracture of rock masses due to pressurization of the pore-space. We will present several demonstrations of LDEC functionality and applications of LDEC to CO{sub 2} injection scenarios including injection into an extensively fractured rockmass. These examples highlight the advantages of explicitly including the geomechanical response of each interface within the rockmass. We present results from our investigations of Teapot Dome using LDEC to study the potential for fault activation during injection. Using this approach, we built finite element models of the rock masses surrounding bounding faults and explicitly simulated the compression and shear on the fault interface. A CO{sub 2} injection source was introduced and the area of fault activation was predicted as a function of injection rate. This work presents an approach where the interactions of all locations on the fault are considered in response to specific injection scenarios. For example, with LDEC, as regions of the fault fail, the shear load is taken up elsewhere on the fault. The results of this study are consistent with previous studies of Teapot Dome and indicate significantly elevated pore pressures are required to activate the bounding faults, given the assumed in situ stress state on the faults.

Morris, J P; Johnson, S M; Friedmann, S J

2008-07-11T23:59:59.000Z

257

Geomechanical Simulations of Caprock Integrity Using the Livermore Distinict Element Method  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Large-scale carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) projects involving annual injections of millions of tons of CO2 are a key infrastructural element needed to substantially reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The large rate and volume of injection will induce pressure and stress gradients within the formation that could activate existing fractures and faults, or drive new fractures through the caprock. We will present results of an ongoing investigation to identify conditions that will activate existing fractures/faults or make new fractures within the caprock using the Livermore Distinct Element Code (LDEC). LDEC is a multiphysics code, developed at LLNL, capable of simulating dynamic fracture of rock masses under a range of conditions. As part of a recent project, LDEC has been extended to consider fault activation and dynamic fracture of rock masses due to pressurization of the pore-space. We will present several demonstrations of LDEC functionality and an application of LDEC to a CO2 injection scenario. We present results from our investigations of Teapot Dome using LDEC to study the potential for fault activation during injection. Using this approach, we built finite element models of the rock masses surrounding bounding faults and explicitly simulated the compression and shear on the fault interface. A CO2 injection source was introduced and the area of fault activation was predicted as a function of injection rate. This work presents an approach where the interactions of all locations on the fault are considered in response to specific injection scenarios. For example, with LDEC, as regions of the fault fail, the shear load is taken up elsewhere on the fault. The results of this study are consistent with previous studies of Teapot Dome and indicate significantly elevated pore pressures are required to activate the bounding faults, given the assumed in situ stress state on the faults.

Morris, J; Johnson, S; Friedmann, S J

2008-04-17T23:59:59.000Z

258

Livermore Lab's giant laser system will bring star power to Earth  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In the 50 years since the laser was first demonstrated in Malibu, California, on May 16, 1960, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) has been a world leader in laser technology and the home for many of the world's most advanced laser systems. That tradition continues today at LLNL's National Ignition Facility (NIF), the world's most energetic laser system. NIF's completion in March 2009 not only marked the dawn of a new era of scientific research - it could also prove to be the next big step in the quest for a sustainable, carbon-free energy source for the world. NIF consists of 192 laser beams that will focus up to 1.8 million joules of energy on a bb-sized target filled with isotopes of hydrogen - forcing the hydrogen nuclei to collide and fuse in a controlled thermonuclear reaction similar to what happens in the sun and the stars. More energy will be produced by this 'ignition' reaction than the amount of laser energy required to start it. This is the long-sought goal of 'energy gain' that has eluded fusion researchers for more than half a century. Success will be a scientific breakthrough - the first demonstration of fusion ignition in a laboratory setting, duplicating on Earth the processes that power the stars. This impending success could not be achieved without the valuable partnerships forged with other national and international laboratories, private industry and universities. One of the most crucial has been between LLNL and the community in which it resides. Over 155 businesses in the local Tri-Valley area have contributed to the NIF, from industrial technology and engineering firms to tool manufacturing, electrical, storage and supply companies. More than $2.3B has been spent locally between contracts with nearby merchants and employee salaries. The Tri-Valley community has enabled the Laboratory to complete a complex and far-reaching project that will have national and global impact in the future. The first experiments were conducted on NIF last summer and fall, successfully delivering a world-record level of ultraviolet laser energy - more than 1.2 million joules - to a target. The experiments also demonstrated the target drive and target capsule conditions required to achieve fusion ignition. When ignition experiments begin later this year, NIF's lasers will create temperatures and pressures in the hydrogen target that exist only in the cores of stars and giant planets and inside thermonuclear weapons. As a key component of the National Nuclear Security Administration's Stockpile Stewardship Program, NIF will offer the means for sustaining a safe, secure and reliable U.S. nuclear deterrent without nuclear testing. NIF is uniquely capable of providing the experimental data needed to develop and validate computer models that will enable scientists to assess the continuing viability of the nation's nuclear stockpile. Along with this vital national security mission, success at NIF also offers the possibility of groundbreaking scientific discoveries in a wide variety of disciplines ranging from hydrodynamics to astrophysics. As a unique facility in the world that can create the conditions that exist in supernovas and in the cores of giant planets, NIF will help unlock the secrets of the cosmos and inspire the next generation of scientists. It is NIF's third mission, energy security that has been generating the most excitement in the news media and the international scientific community. The reasons are obvious: global energy demand, driven by population growth and the aspirations of the developing world, already is straining the planet's existing energy resources. Global need for electricity is expected to double from its current level of about two trillion watts (TW) to four TW by 2030 and could reach eight to ten TW by the end of the century. As many as 10,000 new billion-watt power plants will have to be built to keep up with this demand. Meeting this pressing need will require a sustainable carbon-free energy technology that can supply base load electricity to the world. Successful ignition experim

Moses, E

2010-04-08T23:59:59.000Z

259

L AW R E N C E N A T I O N A L LABORATORY LIVERMORE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

AW AW R E N C E N A T I O N A L LABORATORY LIVERMORE Atoms for Peace After 50 Years R.N. Schock, E.S. Vergino, N. Joeck, and R.F. Lehman Issues in Science and Technology Spring 2004 Spring 2004 UCRL-JRNL-203590 This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor the University of California nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark,

260

Remedial investigation of the High Explosives Burn Pit facility, Building 829 complex, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory site 300  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

To assess any impact on the environment resulting from operations at the High Explosives (HE) Burn Pits at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Site 300, we evaluated the soil, rock, and ground water beneath the burn pit facility. Between November 16, 1986, and January 12, 1987, we drilled eight exploratory holes; one was converted to a monitor well, and another was converted to a piezometer. Seven holes were drilled, geologically logged, and sampled to determine the concentration and extent of substances that may have infiltrated to the subsurface from the burn pits. The eighth hole was completed as a monitor well but was not sampled, and no detailed log was prepared. Electric logging was performed in one exploratory hole further evaluate the geologic conditions. 27 refs., 4 figs., 6 tabs.

Webster-Scholten, C.P.; Crow, N.B.

1989-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "lenox livermore maquoketa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Safety Basis Requirements for Nonnuclear Facilities at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site-Specific Work Smart Standards Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This standard establishes requirements that, when coupled with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL's) Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) methods and other Work Smart Standards for assuring worker safety, assure that the impacts of nonnuclear operations authorized in LLNL facilities are well understood and controlled in a manner that protects the health of workers, the public, and the environment. All LLNL facilities shall be classified based on potential for adverse impact of operations to the health of co-located (i.e., nearby) workers and the public in accordance with this standard, Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 830, Subpart B, and Department of Energy Order (DOE O) 420.2A. This standard provides information on: Objectives; Applicability; Safety analysis requirements; Control selection and maintenance; Documentation requirements; Safety basis review, approval, and renewal; and Safety basis implementation.

Beach, R; Brereton, S; Failor, R; Hildum, S; Spagnolo, S; Van Warmerdam, C

2003-02-24T23:59:59.000Z

262

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

external networking * 106,496 dual-processor nodes * 212,991 processors * 104 racks "Green" supercomputer reduces energy footprint by 75% "Green" supercomputer reduces energy...

263

Installation of semiconductor crystal growth and processing facilities in the Building 166 addition at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A new addition has been constructed to Building 166 at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). This addition is intended to contain facilities as described below. The Metalorganic Chemical Vapor Deposition (MOCVD) facility is a proposed facility for the growth of semiconductor crystals composed of various combinations of gallium, aluminum, indium, arsenic, phosphorous, antimony, silicon, and zinc. This facility will utilize hazardous metal hydride gases (arsine, silane, and disilane) and pyrophoric materials (metal alkyls). The MOCVD process has been intensively developed over the past 10 years and is being safetly utilized in over 75 locations worldwide in both research and manufacturing applications. All equipment in the LLNL MOCVD facility is commercially available and is typical of that used in similar facilities in both industry and academia. The Semiconductor Device Fabrication (SDF) facility is a proposed facility for the fabrication of semiconductor devices from crystals grown in the MOCVD facility. General laboratory chemicals and silane gas will be utilized in this facility. The remaining space in the building addition will consist of an optics laboratory and general purpose work area. The only hazardous materials to be used in these areas are small quantities of common laboratory solvents. For the purposes of this Environmental Assessment, these areas will be considered to be part of the SDF. 27 refs., 4 figs., 6 tabs.

Not Available

1990-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

264

The LLNL (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) ICF (Inertial Confinement Fusion) Program: Progress toward ignition in the Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) Program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) has made substantial progress in target physics, target diagnostics, and laser science and technology. In each area, progress required the development of experimental techniques and computational modeling. The objectives of the target physics experiments in the Nova laser facility are to address and understand critical physics issues that determine the conditions required to achieve ignition and gain in an ICF capsule. The LLNL experimental program primarily addresses indirect-drive implosions, in which the capsule is driven by x rays produced by the interaction of the laser light with a high-Z plasma. Experiments address both the physics of generating the radiation environment in a laser-driven hohlraum and the physics associated with imploding ICF capsules to ignition and high-gain conditions in the absence of alpha deposition. Recent experiments and modeling have established much of the physics necessary to validate the basic concept of ignition and ICF target gain in the laboratory. The rapid progress made in the past several years, and in particular, recent results showing higher radiation drive temperatures and implosion velocities than previously obtained and assumed for high-gain target designs, has led LLNL to propose an upgrade of the Nova laser to 1.5 to 2 MJ (at 0.35 {mu}m) to demonstrate ignition and energy gains of 10 to 20 -- the Nova Upgrade.

Storm, E.; Batha, S.H.; Bernat, T.P.; Bibeau, C.; Cable, M.D.; Caird, J.A.; Campbell, E.M.; Campbell, J.H.; Coleman, L.W.; Cook, R.C.; Correll, D.L.; Darrow, C.B.; Davis, J.I.; Drake, R.P.; Ehrlich, R.B.; Ellis, R.J.; Glendinning, S.G.; Haan, S.W.; Haendler, B.L.; Hatcher, C.W.; Hatchett, S.P.; Hermes, G.L.; Hunt, J.P.; Kania, D.R.; Kauffman, R.L.; Kilkenny, J.D.; Kornblum, H.N.; Kruer, W.L.; Kyrazis, D.T.; Lane, S.M.; Laumann

1990-10-02T23:59:59.000Z

265

Report of the Preliminary Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory Site 300, San Joaquin County, California  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The area subject to this investigation is the existing Lawrence Livermore Laboratory Site 300, located in the region north of Corral Hollow; approximately eight and one half miles southwest of Tracy, San Joaquin County, California. Cartographic location can be determined from the Tracy and Midway USGS 7.5 minute topographic quadrangles, the appropriate portions of which are herein reproduced as Maps 1 and 2. The majority of the approximate 7000 acres of the location lies within San Joaquin County. This includes all of the area arbitrarily designated the 'Eastern Portion' on Map 2 and the majority of the area designated the 'Western Portion' on Map 1. The remaining acreage, along the western boundary of the location, lies within Alameda County. The area is located in the region of open rolling hills immediately north of Corral Hollow, and ranges in elevation from approximately 600 feet, on the flood plain of Corral Hollow Creek, to approximately 1700 feet in the northwest portion of the project location. Proposed for the area under investigation are various, unspecified improvements or modifications to the existing Site 300 facilities. Present facilities consist of scattered buildings, bunkers and magazines, utilized for testing and research purposes, including the necessary water, power, and transportation improvements to support them. The vast majority of the 7000 acres location is presently open space, utilized as buffer zones between test locations and as firing ranges.

Busby, C

2009-11-24T23:59:59.000Z

266

Evaluation of Cavity Collapse and Surface Crater Formation for Selected Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Underground Nuclear Tests - 2010  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report evaluates collapse evolution for selected Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) underground nuclear tests at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS, formerly called the Nevada Test Site). The work is being done at the request of Navarro-Interra LLC, and supports environmental restoration efforts by the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration for the Nevada Site Office. Safety decisions must be made before a surface crater area, or potential surface crater area, can be reentered for any work. Our statements on cavity collapse and surface crater formation are input into their safety decisions. These statements do not include the effects of erosion that may modify the surface collapse craters over time. They also do not address possible radiation dangers that may be present. Subject matter experts from the LLNL Containment Program who had been active in weapons testing activities performed these evaluations. Information used included drilling and hole construction, emplacement and stemming, timing and sequence of the selected test and nearby tests, geology, yield, depth of burial, collapse times, surface crater sizes, cavity and crater volume estimations, and ground motion. Both classified and unclassified data were reviewed. Various amounts of information are available for these tests, depending on their age and other associated activities. Lack of data can hamper evaluations and introduce uncertainty. We make no attempt to quantify this uncertainty.

Pawloski, G A

2011-01-03T23:59:59.000Z

267

Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

I I Chapters 1 through 12 Prepared by: COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration TITLE: Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0348 and DOE/EIS-0236-S3) CONTACT: For further information on this EIS, For general information on the DOE Call: 1-877-388-4930, or contact National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, write or call: Thomas Grim Carol Borgstrom, Director Livermore Site Office Document Manager Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance NNSA (EH-42) 7000 East Avenue U.S. Department of Energy

268

Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary Summary Prepared by: COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration TITLE: Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0348 and DOE/EIS-0236-S3) CONTACT: For further information on this EIS, For general information on the DOE Call: 1-877-388-4930, or contact National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, write or call: Thomas Grim Carol Borgstrom, Director Livermore Site Office Document Manager Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance NNSA (EH-42) 7000 East Avenue U.S. Department of Energy MS L-293 1000 Independence Avenue, SW

269

Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SW/SPEIS Chapter 4 - Description of the Existing Environment SW/SPEIS Chapter 4 - Description of the Existing Environment March 2005 4.9-9 TABLE 4.9.3-1.-Federal and California Species with Protected or Sensitive Status Known to Occur at the Livermore Site and Site 300 in 2001 and 2002 Site Status Common Name Livermore Site Site 300 Federal Status Code State Status Code Plants Big tarplant a - X - CNPS List 1 B Hogwallow starfish - X - CNPS List 4 Large-flowered fiddleneck - X FE (CH) CNPS List 1 B Round-leaved filaree - X - CNPS List 2 Stinkbells - X - CNPS List 4 Diamond-petaled poppy - X FSC CNPS List 1 B Gypsum rock jasmine - X - CNPS List 4 Gypsum loving larkspur - X - CNPS List 4 Invertebrates Valley elderberry longhorn beetle - X FT - California linderiella fairy shrimp - X FSC - Amphibians

270

Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

III III Appendix E through P Prepared by: COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration TITLE: Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0348 and DOE/EIS-0236-S3) CONTACT: For further information on this EIS, For general information on the DOE Call: 1-877-388-4930, or contact National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, write or call: Thomas Grim Carol Borgstrom, Director Livermore Site Office Document Manager Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance NNSA (EH-42) 7000 East Avenue U.S. Department of Energy

271

Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

II II Appendix A through D Prepared by: COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration TITLE: Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0348 and DOE/EIS-0236-S3) CONTACT: For further information on this EIS, For general information on the DOE Call: 1-877-388-4930, or contact National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, write or call: Thomas Grim Carol Borgstrom, Director Livermore Site Office Document Manager Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance NNSA (EH-42) 7000 East Avenue U.S. Department of Energy

272

TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF SOIL REMEDIATION ALTERNATIVES AT THE BUILDING 812 OPERABLE UNIT, LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY SITE 300  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy Livermore Site Office requested a technical review of remedial alternatives proposed for the Building 812 Operable Unit, Site 300 at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The team visited the site and reviewed the alternatives proposed for soil remediation in the draft RI/FS and made the following observations and recommendations. Based on the current information available for the site, the team did not identify a single technology that would be cost effective and/or ecologically sound to remediate DU contamination at Building 812 to current remedial goals. Soil washing is not a viable alternative and should not be considered at the site unless final remediation levels can be negotiated to significantly higher levels. This recommendation is based on the results of soil washing treatability studies at Fernald and Ashtabula that suggest that the technology would only be effective to address final remediation levels higher than 50 pCi/g. The technical review team identified four areas of technical uncertainty that should be resolved before the final selection of a preferred remedial strategy is made. Areas of significant technical uncertainty that should be addressed include: (1) Better delineation of the spatial distribution of surface contamination and the vertical distribution of subsurface contamination in the area of the firing table and associated alluvial deposits; (2) Chemical and physical characterization of residual depleted uranium (DU) at the site; (3) Determination of actual contaminant concentrations in air particulates to support risk modeling; and (4) More realistic estimation of cost for remedial alternatives, including soil washing, that were derived primarily from vendor estimates. Instead of conducting the planned soil washing treatability study, the team recommends that the site consider a new phased approach that combines additional characterization approaches and technologies to address the technical uncertainty in the remedial decision making. The site should redo the risk calculations as the future use scenario has changed for the site. As a result, the existing model is based on very conservative assumptions that result in calculation of unreasonably low cleanup goals. Specifically, the review team proposes that LLNL consider: (1) Revising the industrial worker scenario to a reasonable maximum exposure (RME) for a site worker that performs a weekly walk down of the area for two hours for 25 years (or an alternative RME if the exposure scenario changes); (2) Revising the ESSI of 2 mg U per kg soil for the deer mouse to account for less than 0.05 of the total ingested uranium being adsorbed by the gut; (3) Revising bioaccumulation factors (BAFs) for vegetation and invertebrates that are based on 100 mg of soluble uranium per kg of soil, as the uranium concentration in the slope soil does not average 100 mg/kg and it is not all in a soluble form; and (4) Measuring actual contaminant concentrations in air particulates at the site and using the actual values to support risk calculations. The team recommends that the site continue a phased approach during remediation. The activities should focus on elimination of the principal threats to groundwater by excavating (1) source material from the firing table and alluvial deposits, and (2) soil hotspots from the surrounding slopes with concentrations of U-235 and U-238 that pose unacceptable risk. This phased approach allows the remediation path to be driven by the results of each phase. This reduces the possibility of costly 'surprises', such as failure of soil treatment, and reduces the impact of remediation on endangered habitat. Treatment of the excavated material with physical separation equipment may result in a decreased volume of soil for disposal if the DU is concentrated in the fine-grained fraction, which can then be disposed of in an offsite facility at a considerable cost savings. Based on existing data and a decision to implement the recommended phased approach, the cost of characterization, excavation and physical

Eddy-Dilek, C.; Miles, D.; Abitz, R.

2009-08-14T23:59:59.000Z

273

Results of rapid pyrolysis experiments using eastern US oil shale in the Livermore solid-recycle retort  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Over the past several years Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has operated a 2-ton/day pilot-scale solid-recycle system for the study of oil shale retorting under rapid-pyrolysis conditions. Results of processing eastern US New Albany oil shale are presented and compared with results obtained previously using two western US Green River oil shales. The retort consists of a cascading mixer and plug-flow soak-tank pyrolyzer with an air lift pipe and cascading-bed combustor. In the solid-recycle system, spent shale leaving the pyrolyzer is burned in the lift and cascading-bed combustor and then returned to the retort to heat the incoming raw shale. In laboratory experiments, when raw shale is rapidly heated in a fluidized bed of sand, oil yields above those of Fischer assay are obtained. In the present experiments, hot-recycled shale is used as the heat-carrying media, resulting in oil yields comparable to those obtained from Fischer assay. The distribution and composition of solid, oil, and gas throughout the recycle system is reported for the three shales studied. The distribution of sulfur and nitrogen during processing Green River oil shale has been the focus of environmental studies at LLNL. Eastern oil shale contains 5 to 10 times more sulfur and approximately the same amount of nitrogen as western oil shale. The high sulfur content coupled with low carbonate mineral concentrations results in significant sulfur releases in the combustor-gas, compared with trace releases for western shale. Iron oxide in the recycled solid was found to effectively scrub H/sub 2/S from the pyrolysis gas for both western and eastern shales. From 0.4 to 3% of the raw shale nitrogen is released as NO/sub x/ in the combustor-gas for western shale. Releases for New Albany shale are one-tenth these levels. 8 refs., 9 figs., 7 tabs.

Cena, R.J.; Taylor, R.W.

1986-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

274

Alternate airborne release fraction determination for hazardous waste management storage repository hazard categorization at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Hazardous Waste Management (HWM) facilities are used in the handling and processing of solid and liquid radioactive, hazardous, mixed, and medical wastes generated at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). Waste may be treated or stored in one of the HWM facility units prior to shipment off site for treatment or disposal. Planned facilities such as the Decontamination and Waste Treatment Facility (DWTF) and the Building 280 Container Storage Unit are expected to handle similar waste streams. A hazard classification was preformed in each facility safety analysis report (SAR) according to the DOE Standard 1027-92 `Hazard Categorization and Accident Analysis Techniques for Compliance with DOE Order 5480.23, Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports.` The general methodology practiced by HWM to determine alternate airborne release fractions (ARFs) in those SARs was based upon a beyond evaluation basis earthquake accident scenario characterized by the release of the largest amount of respirable, airborne radioactive material. The alternate ARF was calculated using a three-factor formula consisting of the fraction of failed waste containers, fraction of material released from failed waste containers,and the fraction of material entrained to the environment. Recently, in deliberation with DOE-Oakland representatives, HWM decided to modify this methodology. In place of the current detailed analysis, a more straightforward process was proposed based upon material form, credible accident environments, and empirical data. This paper will discuss the methodology and derivation of ARFs specific to HWM treatment and storage facilities that are alternative to those presented in DOE-STD-1027-92.

Brumburgh, G.P.

1998-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

275

Characterization of the Neutron Fields in the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Radiation Calibration Laboratory Low Scatter Calibration Facility  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In June 2007, the Department of Energy (DOE) revised its rule on Occupational Radiation Protection, Part 10 CFR 835. A significant aspect of the revision was the adoption of the recommendations outlined in International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Report 60 (ICRP-60), including new radiation weighting factors for neutrons, updated internal dosimetric models, and dose terms consistent with the newer ICRP recommendations. ICRP-60 uses the quantities defined by the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) for personnel and area monitoring including the ambient dose equivalent H*(d). A Joint Task Group of ICRU and ICRP has developed various fluence-to-dose conversion coefficients which are published in ICRP-74 for both protection and operational quantities. In February 2008, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) replaced its old pneumatic transport neutron irradiation system in the Radiation Calibration Laboratory (RCL) Low Scatter Calibration Facility (B255, Room 183A) with a Hopewell Designs irradiator model N40. The exposure tube for the Hopewell system is located close to, but not in exactly the same position as the exposure tube for the pneumatic system. Additionally, the sources for the Hopewell system are stored in Room 183A where, prior to the change, they were stored in a separate room (Room 183C). The new source configuration and revision of the 10 CFR 835 radiation weighting factors necessitate a re-evaluation of the neutron dose rates in B255 Room 183A. This report deals only with the changes in the operational quantities ambient dose equivalent and ambient dose rate equivalent for neutrons as a result of the implementation of the revised 10 CFR 835. In the report, the terms 'neutron dose' and 'neutron dose rate' will be used for convenience for ambient neutron dose equivalent and ambient neutron dose rate equivalent unless otherwise stated.

Radev, R

2009-09-04T23:59:59.000Z

276

NSTech Livermore VPP  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NNSA National Nuclear Security Administration NNSS Nevada National Security Site NSTecLO National Security Technologies, LLCLivermore Operations OSHA Occupational Safety...

277

Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Technical Appendices, Volume II, December 2004  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA), within the Office of Security and Safety Performance Assurance (SSA), conducted an inspection of environment, safety, and health (ES&H) at the DOE Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) during October and November 2004. The inspection was performed by the OA Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations. Volume II of this report provides four technical appendices (C through F) containing detailed results of the OA review. Appendix C provides the results of the review of the application of the core functions of ISM for LLNL work activities. Appendix D presents the results of the review of NNSA, LSO, and contractor feedback and continuous improvement processes. Appendix E presents the results of the review of Plutonium Building essential safety system functionality, and Appendix F presents the results of the review of management of the selected focus areas.

278

This work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC5207NA27344 Blank template  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore here Title or division here Date 00, 2008 #12;Humankind challenges NIF-1208-15665.ppt 2Moses, FPA, LIFE, 12/03/08 #12;NIF-1208-15665.ppt Moses, FPA, LIFE, 12/03/08 3 Achieving ignition at the NIF can

279

Draft Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This ''Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement'' (LLNL SW/SPEIS) describes the purpose and need for agency action for the continued operation of LLNL and analyzes the environmental impacts of these operations. The primary purpose of continuing operation of LLNL is to provide support for the National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA's) nuclear weapons stockpile stewardship missions. LLNL, located about 40 miles east of San Francisco, California, is also needed to support other U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) programs and Federal agencies such as the U.S. Department of Defense, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the newly established U.S. Department of Homeland Security. This LLNL SW/SPEIS analyzes the environmental impacts of reasonable alternatives for ongoing and foreseeable future operations, facilities, and activities at LLNL. The reasonable alternatives include the No Action Alternative, Proposed Action, and the Reduced Operation Alternative. The major decision to be made by DOE/NNSA is to select one of the alternatives for the continued operation of the LLNL. As part of the Proposed Action, DOE/NNSA is considering: using additional materials including plutonium on the National Ignition Facility (NIF); increasing the administrative limit for plutonium in the Superblock, which includes the Plutonium Facility, the Tritium Facility, and the Hardened Engineering Test Building; conducting the Integrated Technology Project, using laser isotope separation to provide material for Stockpile Stewardship experiments, in the Plutonium Facility; increasing the material-at-risk limit for the Plutonium Facility; and increasing the Tritium Facility material-at-risk. A discussion of these issues is presented in Section S.5.2, Proposed Action. The ''National Environmental Policy Act'' (NEPA) establishes environmental policy, sets goals, and provides means for implementing the policy. NEPA contains provisions to ensure that Federal agencies adhere to the letter and spirit of the Act. The key provision requires preparation of an environmental impact statement on ''major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment'' (40 ''Code of Federal Regulations'' [CFR] {section}1502.3). NEPA ensures that environmental information is available to public officials and citizens before decisions are made and actions are taken (40 CFR {section}1500.1[b]). DOE has a policy to prepare sitewide environmental impact statements documents for certain large, multiple-facility sites such as LLNL (10 CFR {section}1021.330). In August 1992, DOE released the ''Final Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report for Continued Operations of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore'' (LLNL EIS/EIR). A Record of Decision (ROD) (58 ''Federal Register'' [FR] 6268) was issued in January 1993. With the passage of more than 10 years since the publication of the 1992 LLNL EIS/EIR (DOE/EIS-0157) and because of proposed modifications to existing projects and new programs, NNSA determined that it was appropriate to prepare a new LLNL SW/SPEIS.

N /A

2004-02-27T23:59:59.000Z

280

Status report on the geology of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory site and adjacent areas. Volume I. Text and appendices A-E  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In April, 1979, geoscience personnel at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) initiated comprehensive geologic, seismologic, and hydrologic investigations of the LLNL site and nearby areas. These investigations have two objectives: 1. to obtain data for use in preparing a Final Environmental Impact Report for LLNL, pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act; 2. to obtain data for use in improving the determination of a design basis earthquake for structural analysis of LLNL facilities. The first phases of these investigations have been completed. Work completed to date includes a comprehensive literature review, analyses of three sets of aerial photographs, reconnaissance geophysical surveys, examination of existing LLNL site borehole data, and the logging of seven exploratory trenches, segments of two sewer trenches, a deep building foundation excavation, a road cut, and an enlarged creek bank exposure. One absolute age date has been obtained by the /sup 14/C method and several dates of pedogenic carbonate formation have been obtained by the /sup 230/Th//sup 234/U method. A seismic monitoring network has been established, and planning for a site hydrologic monitoring program and strong motion instrument network has been completed. The seismologic and hydrologic investigations are beyond the scope of this report and will be discussed separately in future documents.

Carpenter, D.W.; Puchlik, K.P.; Ramirez, A.L.; Wagoner, J.L.; Knauss, K.G.; Kasameyer, P.W.

1980-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "lenox livermore maquoketa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Comparison of the Recently proposed Super Marx Generator Approach to Thermonuclear Ignition with the DT Laser Fusion-Fission Hybrid Concept by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The recently proposed Super Marx generator pure deuterium micro-detonation ignition concept is compared to the Lawrence Livermore National Ignition Facility (NIF) Laser DT fusion-fission hybrid concept (LiFE) [1]. In a Super Marx generator a large number of ordinary Marx generators charge up a much larger second stage ultra-high voltage Marx generator, from which for the ignition of a pure deuterium micro-explosion an intense GeV ion beam can be extracted. A typical example of the LiFE concept is a fusion gain of 30, and a fission gain of 10, making up for a total gain of 300, with about 10 times more energy released into fission as compared to fusion. This means a substantial release of fission products, as in fusion-less pure fission reactors. In the Super Marx approach for the ignition of a pure deuterium micro-detonation a gain of the same magnitude can in theory be reached [2]. If feasible, the Super Marx generator deuterium ignition approach would make lasers obsolete as a means for the ignition of ther...

Winterberg, Friedwardt

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

282

TG (TRANSIT GUIDANCE) : spaces for wayfinding in multi-modal transportation hubs, a proposal for Atlanta's Lenox Station  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

"The efficiency of the city and therefore the contribution of urbanization to development will depend to an important degree on how the problems of mobility are resolved. " Wilfred Owen (1972) Based on current urban patterns, ...

Jackson, Steven (Steven Charles), 1974-

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

283

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages

Phonebook | Phonebook | Site Map | Contact Us Search LLNL Go KEY RESEARCH Ensuring the safety, reliability, and security of the U.S. nuclear stockpile and applying science and technology to anticipate, innovate and deliver solutions to global security needs. Weapons Program High Explosives Application Facility Site 300 Global Security Energy and Environmental Security Defense Intelligence Nonproliferation Advancing energy security in the United States through the discovery, development, production and deployment of cost-effective, sustainable systems while protecting the environment. Energy Technologies Carbon Capture and Storage Climate and Carbon U.S. Energy Flow Charts Hydrogen Fuel Geothermal Wind Forecasting Underground Coal Gasification Vehicle Aerodynamics Turning scientific and technological concepts into reality, whether

284

Lawrence Livermore and Los Alamos  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2012. Mr. Kintzer also has been appointed chair of the LANSLLNS Boards of Governors' Ethics and Audit Committee effective September 1. The Ethics and Audit Committee serves in an...

285

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Experimental Test Site (Site 300) Salinity Evaluation and Minimization Plan for Cooling Towers and Mechanical Equipment Discharges  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document was created to comply with the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) Waste Discharge Requirement (Order No. 98-148). This order established new requirements to assess the effect of and effort required to reduce salts in process water discharged to the subsurface. This includes the review of technical, operational, and management options available to reduce total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations in cooling tower and mechanical equipment water discharges at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL's) Experimental Test Site (Site 300) facility. It was observed that for the six cooling towers currently in operation, the total volume of groundwater used as make up water is about 27 gallons per minute and the discharge to the subsurface via percolation pits is 13 gallons per minute. The extracted groundwater has a TDS concentration of 700 mg/L. The cooling tower discharge concentrations range from 700 to 1,400 mg/L. There is also a small volume of mechanical equipment effluent being discharged to percolation pits, with a TDS range from 400 to 3,300 mg/L. The cooling towers and mechanical equipment are maintained and operated in a satisfactory manner. No major leaks were identified. Currently, there are no re-use options being employed. Several approaches known to reduce the blow down flow rate and/or TDS concentration being discharged to the percolation pits and septic systems were reviewed for technical feasibility and cost efficiency. These options range from efforts as simple as eliminating leaks to implementing advanced and innovative treatment methods. The various options considered, and their anticipated effect on water consumption, discharge volumes, and reduced concentrations are listed and compared in this report. Based on the assessment, it was recommended that there is enough variability in equipment usage, chemistry, flow rate, and discharge configurations that each discharge location at Site 300 should be considered separately when deciding on an approach for reducing the salt discharge to the subsurface. The smaller units may justify moderate changes to equipment, and may benefit from increased cleaning frequencies, more accurate and suitable chemical treatment, and sources of make up water and discharge re-use. The larger cooling towers would be more suitable for automated systems where they don't already exist, re-circulation and treatment of blow down water, and enhanced chemical dosing strategies. It may be more technically feasible and cost efficient for the smaller cooling towers to be replaced by closed loop dry coolers or hybrid towers. There are several potential steps that could be taken at each location to reduce the TDS concentration and/or water use. These include: sump water filtration, minimization of drift, accurate chemical dosing, and use of scale and corrosion coupons for chemical calibration. The implementation of some of these options could be achieved by a step-wise approach taken at two representative facilities. Once viable prototype systems have been proven in the field, systematic implementation should proceed for the remaining systems, with cost, desired reduction, and general feasibility taken into consideration for such systems.

Daily III, W D

2010-02-24T23:59:59.000Z

286

Comparison of the recently proposed super-Marx generator approach to thermonuclear ignition with the deuterium-tritium laser fusion-fission hybrid concept by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

DOE Public Access Gateway for Energy & Science Beta (PAGES Beta)

The recently proposed super-Marx generator pure deuterium microdetonation ignition concept is compared to the Lawrence Livermore National Ignition Facility (NIF) Laser deuterium-tritium fusion-fission hybrid concept (LIFE). In a super-Marx generator, a large number of ordinary Marx generators charge up a much larger second stage ultrahigh voltage Marx generator from which for the ignition of a pure deuterium microexplosion an intense GeV ion beam can be extracted. Typical examples of the LIFE concept are a fusion gain of 30 and a fission gain of 10, making up a total gain of 300, with about ten times more energy released into fission as compared to fusion. This means the substantial release of fission products, as in fissionless pure fission reactors. In the super-Marx approach for the ignition of pure deuterium microdetonation, a gain of the same magnitude can, in theory, be reached. If feasible, the super-Marx generator deuterium ignition approach would make lasers obsolete as a means for the ignition of thermonuclear microexplosions.

Winterberg, F.

2009-10-29T23:59:59.000Z

287

Analysis Activities at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Laboratory / Energy Security and Technology Program Jeffrey Stewart Group Leader: Applied Statistics and Economics DOE Hydrogen, Fuel Cells, and Infrastructure Technologies Program Systems Analysis Workshop July 28-29, 2004 Washington, D.C. 2 Charter * LLNL's mission is to provide research in the areas of national and homeland security and other important areas to DOE such as Energy,Climate and Water * To conduct systems and economic modeling and analysis to determine the technical and economic characteristics of individual technologies within systems to achieve policy objectives * DOE NETL, NE,Policy,HEU; Japanese Govt, CEC, Internal 3 History * LLNL has had a systems analysis group for over 25 years supporting national security, defense, energy and environment programs

288

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Laboratory Directed...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

413.2B and LLNL's internal procedures. During the audit, we became aware that LLNL's Laser Inertial Fusion Energy endeavor was supported by a number of funding sources,...

289

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Kimberly S. Budil  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Laboratory Secretary of Energy Dr. Steven Chu Under Secretary of Energy Under Secretary for Science Dr. Steven E. Koonin Under Secretary for Nuclear Security/NNSA Administrator Thomas P. D'Agostino Asst. Secretary for Nuclear Energy Dr. Peter Lyons Office of Science Fusion Energy Sciences Dr. Edmund Synakowski

Shyy, Wei

290

University of California LawrenceLivermore  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

For the nuclear waste application (such as Yucca Mountain, Nevada), flow and transport takes place in the very dry

Wildenschild, Dorthe

291

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Proposal to Participate...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

19, 2003 LLNL leads the DOE effort in tank R&D Insulated pressure vessels Lightweight tanks We have already demonstrated >11% by weight storage Tanks are the "ace in the hole"...

292

Sandia National Laboratories: Livermore Valley Open Campus  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Research Facility Opens at Sandia's California Site On June 13, 2012, in Cyber, Cybersecurity Technologies Research Laboratory, Energy Assurance, Energy Surety, Facilities,...

293

ARM - Campaign Instrument - wfov-livermore  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Instrument Categories Cloud Properties, SurfaceSubsurface Properties Campaigns Spring UAV Campaign Download Data Off Site Campaign : various, including non-ARM sites,...

294

Livermore's biosciences celebrates 50th anniversary | National...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Media Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Video Gallery Photo Gallery Jobs Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home NNSA Blog ...

295

Livermore participates in Science Festival | National Nuclear...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Media Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Video Gallery Photo Gallery Jobs Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home NNSA Blog ...

296

National Securities Technologies _NSTec_ Livermore Operations...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

National Nuclear Security Administration NRTL Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory NSTec National Security Technologies, LLC NTS Nevada Test Site OSHA Occupational Safety and...

297

Lawrence Livermore National Laborotory Safety Basis Assessment...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

in the WSF safety basis. The comprehensive review used a criteria and review approach document to guide the reviewers and examined documentation of controls and their...

298

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Proposal to Participate...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Research for the Hydrogen Fuel Initiative Hydrogen Storage Materials Workshop Proceedings, August 14th and 15th, 2002 Hydrogen Sorption Center of Excellence (HSCoE) Final Report...

299

National Nuclear Security Administration Lawrence Livermore  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

budget challenges, LLNS maintained effective and efficient environment, safety, and health (ES&H), quality and security programs. It continued to implement long-term work...

300

Lawrence Livermore researchers awarded early career funding ...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Todd Gamblin May 16, 2014 at 2:00 pm Related Topics llnl honors and awards Related News SOLAR POWER PURCHASE FOR DOE LABORATORIES Y-12 recognized for outstanding procurement...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "lenox livermore maquoketa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | National Nuclear Security...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

and refurbishment of the nuclear weapons stockpile. LLNL also possesses unique high-energy-density physics capabilities and scientific computing assets. The lab is managed by...

302

Livermore, California: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

818745°, -121.7680088° 818745°, -121.7680088° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":37.6818745,"lon":-121.7680088,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

303

Livermore, New Hampshire: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

745127°, -71.3772971° 745127°, -71.3772971° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":44.0745127,"lon":-71.3772971,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

304

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is home to the National...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

burned could cause dramatic changes to the Earth's climate. A tantalizing alternative is fusion, which has the long-term potential to provide safe, virtually unlimited energy...

305

DOE Selects Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC to Manage...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Addthis Related Articles Department of Energy Announces Completion of World's Largest Laser U.S. Department of Energy and IBM to Collaborate in Advancing Supercomputing...

306

Livermore scientist, engineers train to be inspectors for test...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO). Training has been held in Austria, Jordan, South Korea and Hungary. Of the five U.S. surrogate inspectors selected for the...

307

NNSA Corporate CPEP Process NNSA Lawrence Livermore National...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

course materials and provided lecturestabletop exercises for 2 workshops in Amman, Jordan. The workshops were 1) Chem-Bio Threat Awareness Training, and 2) Workshop on Chemical...

308

John Lindl and Bruce Hammel Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Advances in Indirect Drive ICF Target Physics Presentation to 20th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference #12;NIF in Inertial Confinement Fusion Inertial Confinement Fusion uses direct or indirect drive to couple driver by cold, dense main fuel Direct Drive Hot spot (10 keV) Cold, dense main fuel (200-1000 g/cm3) Indirect

309

Cleantech Open meets with Lawrence Livermore, Sandia national...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Both laboratories, which cosponsored the event with the i-GATE Innovation Hub, have clean energy technologies for which they would like to find commercial partners to develop...

310

Livermore team awarded for hydrogen production research | National...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

by splitting water using sunlight. Shared with collaborators from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV), the award...

311

Expanding Your Horizons Conference, Lawrence Livermore National Lab  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Our goal is to introduce young women in grades 6 through 12 to a variety of diverse and challenging careers and encourage their interest in science and mathematics. At the conference, participants...

312

Veterans reflect on their Lawrence Livermore internships | National...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Our Operations Media Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Video Gallery Photo Gallery Jobs Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home ...

313

FTCP Site Specific Information - Livermore Field Office | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Douglas.Laniohan@nnsa.doe.gov Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Reports Calendar Year 2013 Calendar Year 2012 Calendar Year 2011 Calendar Year 2010 TQP...

314

TQP Qualifying Official Training Approaches- Livermore Site Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A QO is an individual who has the technical experience and/or education in a particular technical area and who, with the necessary training, is authorized to sign qualification cards for designated competencies.

315

2010 Annual Planning Summary Livermore Site Office (LSO)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Annual Planning Summaries briefly describe the status of ongoing NEPA compliance activities, any EAs expected to be prepared in the next 12 months, any EISs expected to be prepared in the next 24...

316

Livermore's Crawford selected for California Council on Science...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Crawford selected for California Council on Science and Technology | National Nuclear Security Administration People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation...

317

Lawrence Livermore Site Office Safety Basis Self-Assessment Final...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

impact of the review team on the quality of the final documents. The reports also document the tracking and closure of a number of conditions of approval or directions...

318

Sandia National Laboratories: Livermore Valley Open Campus (LVOC...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

transfer, and partnerships," said Jackie Kerby Moore, Sandia's manager ... Sandia, SRI International Sign Pact to Advance Hydrogen and Natural Gas Research for...

319

Livermore researchers create new technology for first responders...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

researchers create new technology for first responders | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile...

320

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is home to the National...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Facility (NIF), which began full operations in March 2009. NIF's 192 powerful laser beams, housed in a 10-story building the size of 3 football fields, can deliver nearly 2...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "lenox livermore maquoketa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Livermore highlights key accomplishments in annual report | National...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

highlights key accomplishments in annual report | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing...

322

Livermore engineer to answer questions on Reddit | National Nuclear...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

answer questions on Reddit NNSA Blog Ever wonder what it's like to tap into the human brain? Or did you ponder about the best ways to understand neurological diseases and...

323

Sandia National Laboratories: Featured Programs at the Livermore...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

energy technologies Increasing energy security beyond its current state Reducing greenhouse gas emissions Advising policy makers and technology investors through sound...

324

Five Livermore and LANL Scientists Named "Most Influential Scientific...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

pioneered research that applies codes from studying weapons dynamics to combustion chemistry. William Pitz, LLNL (bottom right) Pitz's research focuses on the development of...

325

SunShot Vision Study: February 2012 (Book), SunShot, Energy Efficiency...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Institute Carl Lenox SunPower Corporation Cara Libby Electric Power Research Institute Jordan Macknick National Renewable Energy Laboratory Arjun Makhijani Institute for Energy and...

326

Organic geochemistry and correlation of Paleozoic source rocks and Trenton crude oils, Indiana  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Shale samples from four cores of the New Albany and Antrim Shales (Devonian) and from six cores of the Maquoketa Group (Ordovician), representing a broad geographic area of Indiana, have been analyzed for total organic carbon, total sulfur, pyrolysis yield (Rock-Eval), bitumen content, and illite crystallinity data. These data indicate that the New Albany, Antrim, and Maquoketa shales contain a sufficient quantity and quality of organic matter to be good petroleum source rocks. Bitumen ratios, Rock-Eval yields, gas chromatography of saturated hydrocarbons, and illite crystallinity data show that the Maquoketa shales have reached a higher level of thermal maturity than the New Albany and Antrim shales. The level of thermal maturity of the Maquoketa shales suggested a maximum burial depth considerably greater than the present depth.

Guthrie, J. (Indiana Geological Survey, Bloomington (USA))

1989-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

327

DOE/EIS-0157-SA-01; Supplement Analysis for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Oakland Operations Office, Oakland, California Oakland Operations Office, Oakland, California 6833/(0(17 $1$/<6,6 147 &RQWLQXHG 2SHUDWLRQ RI /DZUHQFH /LYHUPRUH 1DWLRQDO /DERUDWRU\ DQG 6DQGLD 1DWLRQDO /DERUDWRULHV /LYHUPRUH 9ROXPH , 0DLQ 5HSRUW March 1999 DOE/EIS-0157-SA-01 6833/(0(17 $1$/<6,6 147 &RQWLQXHG 2SHUDWLRQ RI /DZUHQFH /LYHUPRUH 1DWLRQDO /DERUDWRU\ DQG 6DQGLD 1DWLRQDO /DERUDWRULHV /LYHUPRUH 9ROXPH , 0DLQ 5HSRUW March 1999 DOE/EIS-0157-SA-01 Supplement Analysis March 1999 iii CONTENTS NOTATION......................................................................................................................... vii SUMMARY......................................................................................................................... S-1 1 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................

328

Measurement and Characterization of NOx Adsorber Regeneration...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

West, Bill Partridge, Sam Lewis, Dean Edwards, Katey Lenox, Jae-Soon Choi, Todd Toops Oak Ridge National Laboratory Fuels, Engines and Emissions Research Center feerc.ornl.gov...

329

HPCGridSANDReport  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

October 2011 Initial Operating Experience of the La Ola 1.2-MW Photovoltaic System Jay Johnson, Benjamin Schenkman, Abraham Ellis, Jimmy Quiroz, and Carl Lenox Prepared by Sandia...

330

SSA 2012 Annual Meeting Announcement  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...Continental Scale Programs. Schultz, A., and Hu, X. 11:45 Generation and Propagation of Shear Waves from the HUMBLE REDWOOD Explosions. Bonner, J. L., Leidig, M. R., Reinke, R., and Lenox, E. Topography Effects on a Single Slope...

331

Safety Analysis (SA) of the decontamination facility, Building 419, at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This safety analysis was performed for the Manager, Plant Services at LLNL and fulfills the requirements of DOE Order 5481.1. The analysis was based on field inspections, document review, computer calculations, and extensive input from Waste Management personnel. It was concluded that the maximum quantities of radioactive materials that safety procedures allow to be handled in this building do not pose undue risks on- or off-site even in postulated severe accidents. Risk from the various hazards at this facility vary from low to moderate as specified in DOE Order 5481.1. Recommendations are made for improvements that will reduce risks even further.

Odell, B.N.

1980-06-17T23:59:59.000Z

332

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Livermore Site Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

333

Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: 1986 annual report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics (IGPP) at LLNL is to enrich the opportunities of University of California campus researchers by making available to them some of the Laboratory's unique facilities and expertise, and to broaden the scientific horizon of LLNL researchers by encouraging collaborative or interdisciplinary work with other UC scientists. The IGPP continues to emphasize three fields of research - geoscience, astrophysics, and high-pressure physics - each administered by a corresponding IGPP Research Center. Each Research Center coordinates the mini-grant work in its field, and also works with the appropriate LLNL programs and departments, which frequently can provide supplementary funding and facilities for IGPP projects. 62 refs., 18 figs., 2 tabs.

Max, C.E. (ed.)

1987-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

334

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory oil shale project. Quarterly report, April-June 1982  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The effect of the proportion of oxidized shale to raw shale, on the heat of combustion of retort product was studied in a fluidized sand bed at 500/sup 0/C. Results show a significant increase in the heat of combustion, produced by the activity of the oxidized shale. The functionality of organic sulfur in various oil shale types is being investigated. An oil shale pyrolyzer for aboveground retorting is being studied in an engineering facility. Thermochemical and experimental equations were developed for the heat of combustion of raw shale. A heat balance was calculated for 24.6 gal/ton Colorado oil shale. The rapid-pyrolysis data was analyzed to determine the best kinetic scheme for retort modeling. Incipient fluidization velocity measurements were made for various crushed oil shale mixtures of different particle sizes. 10 figures, 1 table. (DLC)

Carley, J.F. (ed.)

1982-09-14T23:59:59.000Z

335

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Proposal to Participate in the Carbon and Metal Hydride Virtual Centers  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation from the Hydrogen Storage Pre-Solicitation Meeting held June 19, 2003 in Washington, DC.

336

Donald J. Kintzer named to the Lawrence Livermore and Los Alamos...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2012. Mr. Kintzer also has been appointed chair of the LANSLLNS Boards of Governors' Ethics and Audit Committee effective September 1. The Ethics and Audit Committee serves in an...

337

Laser fusion experiments, facilities, and diagnostics at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The progress of the LLNL Laser Fusion Program in our work to achieve high gain thermonuclear microexplosions is discussed. Many experiments have been successfully performed and...

Ahlstrom, H G

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

338

Rationale and summary of methods for determining ultrasonic properties of materials at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report is a summary of the methods used to determine ultrasonic velocities through the many materials tested at the Acoustic Properties of Materials Laboratory. Ultrasonic velocity techniques enable the determination of material properties, including elastic moduli, without harming the materials being tested, an advantage some over mechanical methods. Ultrasonic modulus determination has other advantages as well: (1) relative ease and low cost of material preparation; and (2) comparative analysis to physical testing as a function of material loading rate dependence. In addition, ultrasonic measurement provides clues to determine grain size and orientation, and provides a relative indication of material anisotropy with respect to the material geometry. The authors usually perform ultrasonic measurements on materials in ambient atmospheric conditions, and in a relatively free-free condition. However, the authors can perform them in other environments, as required. This paper describes some of the techniques used in this laboratory and shows how ultrasonic velocities are used to establish elastic constants. It also includes a sample test report for a homogeneous isotropic solid, along with a list of references.

Brown, A.E.

1995-02-09T23:59:59.000Z

339

Atomic vapor laser isotope separation at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: a status report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The field of laser induced chemistry began in earnest early in the 1970's with the initiation of major efforts in laser isotope separation (LIS) of uranium. Though many specialized, small-scale photochemical and diagnostic applications have been identified and evaluated experimentally, and continue to show promise, currently the only high payoff, large-scale applications remain LIS of special elements. Aspects of the physical scaling, technology status and economic basis of uranium LIS are examined with special emphasis on the effort at LLNL.

Davis, J.I.

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

340

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Livermore Site Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "lenox livermore maquoketa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Progress report on Nuclear Density project with Lawrence Livermore National Lab Year 2010  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The main goal for year 2010 was to improve parallelization of the configuration interaction code BIGSTICK, co-written by W. Erich Ormand (LLNL) and Calvin W. Johnson (SDSU), with the parallelization carried out primarily by Plamen Krastev, a postdoc at SDSU and funded in part by this grant. The central computational algorithm is the Lanczos algorithm, which consists of a matrix-vector multiplication (matvec), followed by a Gram-Schmidt reorthogonalization.

Johnson, C W; Krastev, P; Ormand, W E

2011-03-11T23:59:59.000Z

342

2014 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Livermore Field Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

343

Initial results of the Tandem Mirror Experiment (TMX) at the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Initial experimental results from the Tandem Mirror Experiment (TMX) are presented. Axial profiles of the plasma density and potential necessary for electrostatically enhanced confinement of the central-cell ions have been generated and sustained for the duration of neutral-beam injection. The resulting central-cell ion confinement against axial loss is improved by a factor as large as 9 above that given by magnetic confinement alone. The plasma exhibits gross magnetohydrodynamic stability and microstability. Under some conditions, a residual level of ion cyclotron fluctuations in the end cells heats the central-cell ions and degrades their confinement.

Grubb, D.P.; Anderson, C.A.; Casper, T.A.; Clauser, J.F.; Coensgen, F.H.; Correll, D.L.; Cummins, W.F.; Davis, J.C.; Drake, R.P.; Foote, J.H.

1980-04-02T23:59:59.000Z

344

George F. Chapline EGG-M-88285 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

in mind though that the need to cool the moderator by conventional means is one of the factors that will limit the power of a fission fragment rocket. Another factor that will...

345

Global Biogeochemistry Models and Global Carbon Cycle Research at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The climate modeling community has long envisioned an evolution from physical climate models to ''earth system'' models that include the effects of biology and chemistry, particularly those processes related to the global carbon cycle. The widely reproduced Box 3, Figure 1 from the 2001 IPCC Scientific Assessment schematically describes that evolution. The community generally accepts the premise that understanding and predicting global and regional climate change requires the inclusion of carbon cycle processes in models to fully simulate the feedbacks between the climate system and the carbon cycle. Moreover, models will ultimately be employed to predict atmospheric concentrations of CO{sub 2} and other greenhouse gases as a function of anthropogenic and natural processes, such as industrial emissions, terrestrial carbon fixation, sequestration, land use patterns, etc. Nevertheless, the development of coupled climate-carbon models with demonstrable quantitative skill will require a significant amount of effort and time to understand and validate their behavior at both the process level and as integrated systems. It is important to consider objectively whether the currently proposed strategies to develop and validate earth system models are optimal, or even sufficient, and whether alternative strategies should be pursued. Carbon-climate models are going to be complex, with the carbon cycle strongly interacting with many other components. Off-line process validation will be insufficient. As was found in coupled atmosphere-ocean GCMs, feedbacks between model components can amplify small errors and uncertainties in one process to produce large biases in the simulated climate. The persistent tropical western Pacific Ocean ''double ITCZ'' and upper troposphere ''cold pole'' problems are examples. Finding and fixing similar types of problems in coupled carbon-climate models especially will be difficult, given the lack of observations required for diagnosis and validation of biogeochemical processes.

Covey, C; Caldeira, K; Guilderson, T; Cameron-Smith, P; Govindasamy, B; Swanston, C; Wickett, M; Mirin, A; Bader, D

2005-05-27T23:59:59.000Z

346

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Livermore Field Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

347

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Livermore Field Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

348

Energy Flow: Flow Charts Illustrating United States Energy Resources and Usage, from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

DOE Data Explorer [Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)]

Decision makers have long recognized the importance of visualizing energy and material flows in a way that distinguishes between resources, transformations and services. Research priorities can be defined in terms of changes to the flows, and the consequences of policy or technology shifts can be traced both upstream and downstream. The usefulness of this top-down view is limited by the level of detail that can be conveyed in a single image. We use two techniques to balance information content with readability. First we employe visualization techniques, such as those embodied in the energy Sankey diagram below (Figure 1), to display both qualitative (relative line weight) and quantitative (listed values) information in a reader-friendly package. The second method is to augment static images with dynamic, scalable digital content containing multiple layers (e.g. energy, carbon and economic data). This transitions the audience from that of a passive reader to an active user of the information. When used in conjunction these approaches enable relatively large, interconnected processes to be described and analyzed efficiently. [copied from the description at http://en.openei.org/wiki/LLNL_Energy_Flow_Charts#cite_note-1

349

This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

to ignition temperature 1 10 100 0.1 1 10 TargetGain Laser Energy (MJ) NIC Central Hot Spot Igni1on Fast Igni1on Lower velocity Higher fuel mass Higher gain #12;Ignition requires using an ultraintense laser-guided fast ignition 2. Relativistic laser interaction (I>1020 W/cm2) & electron generation--beyond current

350

Laser beam control and diagnostic systems for the copper-pumped dye laser system at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The laser system described in the previous paper is used for experiments in which success requires tight tolerances on beam position, direction, and wavefront. Indeed, the optimum performance of the laser itself depends on careful delivery of copper laser light to the dye amplifiers, precise propagation of dye laser beams through restricted amplifier apertures, and accurate monitoring of laser power at key locations. This paper describes the alignment systems, wavefront correction systems, and laser diagnostics systems which ensure that the control requirements of both the laser and associated experiments are met. Because laser isotope separation processes utilize more than one wavelength, these systems monitor and control multiple wavelengths simultaneously.

Bliss, E.S.; Peterson, R.L.; Salmon, J.T.; Thomas, R.A.

1992-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

351

Identification of Process Hazards and Accident Scenarios for Site 300 B-Division Firing Areas, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes a hazard and accident analysis conducted for Site 300 operations to support update of the ''Site 300 B-Division Firing Areas Safety Analysis Report'' (SAR) [LLNL 1997]. A significant change since the previous SAR is the construction and the new Contained Firing Facility (CFF). Therefore, this hazard and accident analysis focused on the hazards associated with bunker operations to ensure that the hazards at CFF are properly characterized in the updated SAR. Hazard tables were created to cover both the CFF and the existing bunkers with ''open air'' firing tables.

Lambert, H; Johnson, G

2001-05-04T23:59:59.000Z

352

CLIMATE MODELING BEST ESTIMATE DATASET (CMBE) -NEW ADDITIONS Renata McCoy, Shaocheng Xie, Stephen Klein, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

CLIMATE MODELING BEST ESTIMATE DATASET (CMBE) - NEW ADDITIONS Renata McCoy, Shaocheng Xie, Stephen ARM product, the Climate Modeling Best Estimate (CMBE) dataset, is being augmented with the additional observational and model data. The CMBE dataset was created to serve the needs of climate model developers

353

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

D D DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR MONARCH WARREN COUNTY WIND TURBINE PROJECT LENOX TOWNSHIP WARREN COUNTY, ILLINOIS US Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Golden Field Office FEBRUARY 2011 DOE/EA-1800D DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR MONARCH WARREN COUNTY WIND TURBINE PROJECT LENOX TOWNSHIP WARREN COUNTY, ILLINOIS US Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Golden Field Office FEBRUARY 2011 DOE/EA-1800D i February 2011 COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy TITLE: Draft Environmental Assessment: Monarch Warren County Wind Turbine Project,

354

Spent Shale Grouting of Abandoned In-Situ Oil Shale Retorts  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Mineral Reactions in Colorado Oil Shale," Lawrence Livermore1978. of Decomposition of Colorado Oil Shale: II. LivermoreEffects Lawrence of Steam on Oil Shale Retorting: Livermore

Fox, J.P.; Persoff, P.

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

355

Audit Report: IG-0511 | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

11 Audit Report: IG-0511 July 9, 2001 Research and Development at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore), a major component of...

356

Using Advanced Imaging to Study Fish  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Browning, with whom nothing is impossible. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee co-chairs, Dr. Ann Kier and Dr. Duncan MacKenzie, my committee member, Dr. Mark Lenox, and my resident director, Dr. Vince Gresham... .............................................................................................................. ii DEDICATION .......................................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................... v NOMENCLATURE...

Browning, Zoe Swezy

2013-05-31T23:59:59.000Z

357

Oxygen isotopic composition of chondritic interplanetary dust particles: A genetic link between carbonaceous chondrites and  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

a Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Glenn T. Seaborg Institute, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA 94550, USA

358

NDCX-II project commencing at LBNL  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

facility is Livermores National Ignition Facility (NIF).NIF is expected to establish the fundamental feasibility of

Friedman, Alex

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

359

EA-1442: Final Environmental Assessment  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA

360

EA-1442: Final Environmental Assessment, Revised  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "lenox livermore maquoketa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

;HPDC'13 Scalable Checkpoint/ Restart (SCR) ... SCR_Start_checkpt(); SCR_Route_file(fn,fn2); ... fwrite(data,...); ... SCR_Complete_checkpt(); SCR_Start_checkpt(); SCR_Route_file(fn,fn2); ... fwrite(data,...); ... SCR_Complete_checkpt(); 2 SCR_Start_checkpt(); SCR_Route_file(fn,fn2); ... fwrite(data,...); ... SCR_Complete_checkpt(); 2

Panda, Dhabaleswar K.

362

JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE Colloque C7, supplkment au no 7, Tome 40, Juillet 1979,page C7-97 Progress of laser fusion at Lawrence Livermore Laboratory  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

futur nous rtserve d'obstacles majeurs pour obtenir les densites ntcessaires pour une reac- tion. - Inertial confinement fusion is the present and future source of energy in our universe. Derivatives, such as solar, geothermal, wind, and biomass are proposed as future substitutes for possible fuel sources. All

Boyer, Edmond

363

Final closure plan for the high-explosives open burn treatment facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Experimental Test Site 300  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document addresses the interim status closure of the HE Open Bum Treatment Facility, as detailed by Title 22, Division 4.5, Chapter 15, Article 7 of the Califonia Code of Regulations (CCR) and by Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 265, Subpart G, ``Closure and Post Closure.`` The Closure Plan (Chapter 1) and the Post- Closure Plan (Chapter 2) address the concept of long-term hazard elimination. The Closure Plan provides for capping and grading the HE Open Bum Treatment Facility and revegetating the immediate area in accordance with applicable requirements. The Closure Plan also reflects careful consideration of site location and topography, geologic and hydrologic factors, climate, cover characteristics, type and amount of wastes, and the potential for contaminant migration. The Post-Closure Plan is designed to allow LLNL to monitor the movement, if any, of pollutants from the treatment area. In addition, quarterly inspections will ensure that all surfaces of the closed facility, including the cover and diversion ditches, remain in good repair, thus precluding the potential for contaminant migration.

Mathews, S.

1997-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

364

Historical Doses from Tritiated Water and Tritiated Hydrogen Gas Released to the Atmosphere from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). Part 5. Accidental Releases  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Over the course of fifty-three years, LLNL had six acute releases of tritiated hydrogen gas (HT) and one acute release of tritiated water vapor (HTO) that were too large relative to the annual releases to be included as part of the annual releases from normal operations detailed in Parts 3 and 4 of the Tritium Dose Reconstruction (TDR). Sandia National Laboratories/California (SNL/CA) had one such release of HT and one of HTO. Doses to the maximally exposed individual (MEI) for these accidents have been modeled using an equation derived from the time-dependent tritium model, UFOTRI, and parameter values based on expert judgment. All of these acute releases are described in this report. Doses that could not have been exceeded from the large HT releases of 1965 and 1970 were calculated to be 43 {micro}Sv (4.3 mrem) and 120 {micro}Sv (12 mrem) to an adult, respectively. Two published sets of dose predictions for the accidental HT release in 1970 are compared with the dose predictions of this TDR. The highest predicted dose was for an acute release of HTO in 1954. For this release, the dose that could not have been exceeded was estimated to have been 2 mSv (200 mrem), although, because of the high uncertainty about the predictions, the likely dose may have been as low as 360 {micro}Sv (36 mrem) or less. The estimated maximum exposures from the accidental releases were such that no adverse health effects would be expected. Appendix A lists all accidents and large routine puff releases that have occurred at LLNL and SNL/CA between 1953 and 2005. Appendix B describes the processes unique to tritium that must be modeled after an acute release, some of the time-dependent tritium models being used today, and the results of tests of these models.

Peterson, S

2007-08-15T23:59:59.000Z

365

Type B Accident Investigation Board Report on the June 2002 High Radiation Dose to Extremities in Building 151, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This report is an independent product of the Type B Accident Investigation Board appointed by Camille Yuan-Soo Hoo, Manager of the U.S. Department of Energy, Oakland Operations Office.

366

EA-1800: DOE's Proposed Financial Assistance to Illinois for the Monarch  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

00: DOE's Proposed Financial Assistance to Illinois for the 00: DOE's Proposed Financial Assistance to Illinois for the Monarch Warren County Wind Turbine Project, Lenox Township, Warren County, Illinois EA-1800: DOE's Proposed Financial Assistance to Illinois for the Monarch Warren County Wind Turbine Project, Lenox Township, Warren County, Illinois Overview The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has provided Federal funding to the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity (DCEO) under the State Energy Program (SEP). DCEO is seeking to provide $5 million of its SEP funds to Monarch Wind Power (MWP), who would use these funds for the design, permitting, and construction of 12, 1.6-megawatt wind turbines, for a combined generation capacity of 19.2 megawatts. Public Comment Opportunities No public comment opportunities available at this time.

367

Physicists Challenge Reports of Accelerated Decay of Nuclear...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Physicists Challenge Reports of Accelerated Decay of Nuclear Excited State LIVERMORE, Calif.-Physicists from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, in collaboration with...

368

Type A Accident Report of the June 26, 2009 Vehicle Fatality...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

the June 26, 2009 Vehicle Fatality at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Type A Accident Report of the June 26, 2009 Vehicle Fatality at Lawrence Livermore National...

369

Prediction equations for significant duration of earthquake ground motions considering site and near-source effects  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

this study Event Imperial Valley Kern County San FranciscoItaly Santa Barbara Tabas, Iran Coyote Lake Imperial ValleyImperial Valley Imperial Valley Livermore Livermore Anza

Kempton, Justin J; Stewart, Jonathan P

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

370

Women @ Energy: Dona Crawford | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Livermore National Laboratory, Dona L. Crawford leads the Laboratory's high performance computing efforts. As Associate Director for Computation at Lawrence Livermore...

371

Enforcement Letter, NEL-2013-03- July 22, 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC related to Programmatic Deficiencies in the Software Quality Assurance Program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

372

Posters Cloud Parameterizations in Global Climate Models: The...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 Posters Cloud Parameterizations in Global Climate Models: The Role of Aerosols J. E. Penner and C. C. Chuang Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, California...

373

7/3/2014 WSU Physics and Astronomy-Events -Colloquium Schedule http://physics.wsu.edu/Events/Events-Colloquium.html 1/2  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, NIF User Office, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and incoming Vice President and Materials Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Abstract Title: Predicting the Properties

Collins, Gary S.

374

HEC-DPSSL 2012 Workshop, Organizing Committee: National Ignition...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Robert J. Deri Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Michael Dunne Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Meeting Support Trina Voelker NIF Event & Protocol Office Deputy...

375

NIF Experiments Presentation by Omar Hurricane | Department of...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Documents & Publications NIF Presentation by Ed Moses Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - August 2014 Lessons Learned by Lawrence Livermore...

376

Microsoft PowerPoint - 05_ARM 2007 Meeting.ppt [Compatibility...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

ARM Measurements to Global Modeling Catherine Chuang, Steve Chin, Shaocheng Xie, James Kelly, and James Boyle Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore Objectives Examine...

377

Sandia National Laboratories: Solar Newsletter  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Partnership on Livermore Valley Open Campus On February 26, 2013, in Concentrating Solar Power, Energy, Livermore Valley Open Campus (LVOC), News, News & Events,...

378

Sandia National Laboratories: Cool Earth Solar  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Partnership on Livermore Valley Open Campus On February 26, 2013, in Concentrating Solar Power, Energy, Livermore Valley Open Campus (LVOC), News, News & Events,...

379

Meteoritics & Planetary Science 43, Nr 3, 561569 (2008) Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Sciences Laboratory, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA 6Glenn T. Seaborg Institute, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94551, USA *Corresponding

380

Microsoft Word - Renewable Energy Project at LLNL_June 2011_jb...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

422-2567 NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION PURSUING DEVELOPMENT OF A RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECT AT THE LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY Livermore, CA - The U.S....

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "lenox livermore maquoketa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Microsoft Word - ressler_abstract  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

May 11, at 3:45 pm Surrogate reactions for nuclear energy applications Dr. J. J. Ressler Lawrence Livermore National Labs, Livermore, CA New reactor designs and materials,...

382

Lopatin Analysis of maturation and petroleum generation in the Illinois basin  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A modified Lopatin approach was used to evaluate the present-day maturity of Paleozoic source rock units across the Illinois basin, timing of generation, regional porosity trends, and basin paleostructure during major generative events. Ten cases were modeled at 100 locations to test assumed paleogeothermal gradients, post-Pennsylvanian overburden thicknesses, and rates of erosional stripping. Lopatin predicted maturities for the Herrin ({number sign}6) Coal and the New Albany Shale are in good agreement ({plus minus}0.02% R{sub O}) with measured maturities if 500-3,000 ft of post-Middle Pennsylvanian strata and were deposited and subsequently eroded between the Permian and mid-Cretaceous and if paleogeothermal gradients were within a few {degree}C/km of present-day gradients. Predicted mean reflectance levels range from 1.0 to 4.0% R{sub O} at the base of the Potsdam Megagroup, 0.7 to 3.5% at the base of the Know Megagroup, and 0.6 to 1.3% at the base of the Maquoketa Shale, excluding only a small high-maturity area in southeastern Illinois. The Knox and Potsdam section attained oil generation 475-300 Ma, while the Maquoketa and the younger New Albany Shale reached the oil window much later: 300-250 Ma. Because most significant structures in the basin formed after 300 Ma, any pre-Maquoketa source rocks were already within the gas zone and may have been largely spent by the time known structures formed. Any Know or deeper traps in the basin will probably contain gas, be restricted to old structures (earlier than 300 Ma) or stratigraphic traps, and will hold pre-300 Ma generated hydrocarbons which subsequently cracked to gas.

Cluff, R.M. (Discovery Group, Denver, CO (United States)); Byrnes, A.P. (Geocore, Loveland, CO (United States))

1991-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

383

DETERT RESERVOIR ROCK COTATI GLEN  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

LEANDRO HAYWARD DUBLIN LIVERMORE ALTAMONT MIDWAY MONTARA MOUNTAIN SAN MATEO REDWOOD POINT NEWARK NILES LA

384

Anomalous electron-ion energy coupling in electron drift wave turbulence  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

NIF) [6] is an updated inertial confinement device whose construction was completed at Lawrence Livermore

Zhao, Lei

385

Accepted for publication in Rev. Sci. instrum. (2008). First measurements of the absolute neutron spectrum using the Magnetic Recoil  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, USA 3 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA 4 Los Alamos National, Albuquerque, New Mexico, May 2008. b) Present address: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore neutron spectrum are presented. In addition, measuring R at the National Ignition Facility (NIF) [G

386

Snowmass Outcomes Gerald Navratil (Columbia University)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

building the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The NIF, and other

387

Detailed Modeling of HCCI and PCCI combustion and Multi-cylinder HCCI Engine Control  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

2003 DEER Conference Presentation: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory/University of California, Berkeley

388

Rotary Vapor Compression Cycle Technology: A Pathway to Ultra-Efficient Air Conditioning, Heating and Refrigeration  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Lead Performer: Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CAPartners: Creative Thermal Solutions, Urbana, IL

389

The Mechanical Engineering Building, Then and Now  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

mainframe (1964) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory HP-41CV (1979) David G. Hicks Apple #12;Registering

Lightsey, Glenn

390

Microsoft Word - LLNLControlledSubstancesFinal Report Cover 02032011 ws  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Management of Controlled Management of Controlled Substances at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory INS-O-11-01 February 2011 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 February 10, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, LIVERMORE SITE OFFICE FROM: Sandra D. Bruce Assistant Inspector General for Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Inspection Report on "Management of Controlled Substances at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory" BACKGROUND As part of its national defense mission, the Department of Energy's (Department) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore) actively engages in scientific, engineering, and environmental research activities. Livermore is managed and operated under contract by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the National Nuclear Security Administration

391

EPA Notice of Availability of the Site-wide Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Stockpile Stewardship and Management, Implementation (DOE/EIS-0348/DOE/EIS-0236-S3)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

08 08 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 82 / Friday, April 29, 2005 / Notices beneficial uses of dredged materials (i.e., wetlands restoration in Dorchester County, MD). EPA expressed environmental concerns over the remaining three alternatives (i.e., the proposed multiple new Confined Disposal Facilities in the Patapsco River, the Poplar Island Environmental Restoration Project expansion and the Large Island Restoration Middle Bay). EPA recommended that continued use of Open Water Placement in Virginia include the already designated NorfolkOcean Disposal Site given its available capacity. Rating EC1 EIS No. 20050053, ERP No. D-CGD- E03013-00, Compass Port and Deepwater Port License Application, To Construct a Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Receiving, Storage and

392

Exploration model for shallow Silurian (Kankakee) carbonate reservoirs in western Illinois  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Reservoirs in shallow (600-650 ft deep) basal Silurian Kankakee carbonates at Buckhorn consolidated, Siloam, and Kellerville oil fields in western Illinois have produced nearly 2 million bbl of oil, but were developed essentially by random drilling. A new exploration model that combines lithologic studies and isopach mapping has been developed at the Illinois State Geological Survey. Isopach mapping of Silurian and Devonian rocks between an organic facies in the Mississippian-Devonian New Albany Shale and the top of the Ordovician Maquoketa Shale reveals thickened sequences that coincide with most of the oil fields. These thickened intervals apparently reflect subtle paleovalleys eroded into the Maquoketa shale during the Ordovician-Silurian hiatus. During the initial Silurian marine transgression, these paleovalleys at the base of the Kankakee were filled with carbonates to form the thickened sequences. Differential erosion at the top of the Kankakee does not satisfactorily explain the locally thickened sequences in the Kankakee. Lithologic studies suggest that subsurface fluid flows concentrated along these paleovalleys contributed to subsequent diagenesis of valleyfill carbonates. Diagenetic alteration of these carbonates resulted in development of basal Kankakee reservoirs within the paleovalleys. This concept of Kankakee reservoirs occurring within paleovalleys at the Ordovician-Silurian unconformity is a new exploration model that can aid in the search for similar traps in western Illinois.

Crockett, J.E.; Seyler, B.J.; Whitaker, S.

1987-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

393

Space charge measurements downwind from a monopolar 500 KV HVDC test line  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

One quantity that helps describe the electrical environment in the vicinity of a HVDC line is space charge, a quantity that consists of charged air ions and charged aerosols. This paper describes measurements made at the Electric Power Research Institute's High Voltage Transmission Research Center (HVTRC) in Lenox, MA to determine the concentration of space charge present downwind of a HVDC test line and the influence of wind on the space charge level. The instrumentation used to make the measurements of space charge downwind of the line is also described.

Carter, P.J.; Johnson, G.B. (General Electric Co., EPRI-High Voltage Transmission, Research Center, Lenox, MA (US))

1988-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

394

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Accountability and Control of Explosives Accountability and Control of Explosives at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's High Explosives Applications Facility INS-O-13-06 September 2013 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 30, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, LIVERMORE FIELD OFFICE FROM: Sandra D. Bruce Assistant Inspector General for Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Inspection Report on "Accountability and Control of Explosives at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's High Explosives Applications Facility" BACKGROUND The High Explosives Applications Facility (HEAF) is a state-of-the-art explosives research facility located on-site at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore). Livermore

395

Inspection Report: INS-L-11-05 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 5 Inspection Report: INS-L-11-05 September 21, 2011 Fixed Monthly Living Expense Payments at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore) is a Department of Energy (Department) laboratory managed and operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the Department's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). Livermore's mission is to ensure the safety and security of the nation through applied science and technology. In certain circumstances, Livermore utilizes subcontractors to obtain specialized skill sets that are not available locally. To minimize travel expenses, some subcontractors receive fixed monthly living expenses (FMLE), which are negotiated travel reimbursements that provide a fixed monthly payment to

396

Inspection Report: IG-0820 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 0 Inspection Report: IG-0820 September 4, 2009 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Protective Force Authority The Department of Energy's (Department) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore) is a premier research and development institution supporting the Department's scientific, engineering, environmental, and national security activities. Livermore is managed and operated under contract by Lawrence Livermore National Security (LLNS) LLC, for the Department's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). In accordance with the Department's safeguards and security policy, Livermore maintains a cadre of armed protective force officers to prevent and defend against malevolent acts. Federal regulations establish protective force arrest authority to enforce specific laws regarding

397

10-NIF Dedication: Ellen Tauscher  

ScienceCinema (OSTI)

The National Ignition Facility, the world's largest laser system, was dedicated at a ceremony on May 29, 2009 at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. These are the remarks by Congresswoman Ellen Tauscher, of California's 10th district, which includes Livermore.

Congresswoman Ellen Tauscher

2010-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

398

CX-012321: Categorical Exclusion Determination  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Vessel Burst Test Site, Site 300, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B3.11 Date: 06/03/2014 Location(s): California Offices(s): Lawrence Livermore Site Office

399

Papers and Presentations - 2014  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

and Presentations NIF&PS People In the News Press Kit S&TR Articles Contact LLNL Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 7000 East Avenue * Livermore, CA 94550 Operated by...

400

Jennifer Anthony  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

and Presentations NIF&PS People In the News Press Kit S&TR Articles Contact LLNL Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 7000 East Avenue * Livermore, CA 94550 Operated by...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "lenox livermore maquoketa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Science & Technology - 2014  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

and Presentations NIF&PS People In the News Press Kit S&TR Articles Contact LLNL Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 7000 East Avenue * Livermore, CA 94550 Operated by...

402

Experimental Highlights - 2014  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

and Presentations NIF&PS People In the News Press Kit S&TR Articles Contact LLNL Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 7000 East Avenue * Livermore, CA 94550 Operated by...

403

Ab Initio Theory of Light-ion Reactions Petr Navratil1, Sofia Quaglioni1, and Robert Roth2  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, L-414, Livermore, CA 94551, USA 2 Institut f n+4He fusion used at ITER and at the National Ignition Facility (NIF). Even though there have been

Roth, Robert

404

10-NIF Dedication: Ellen Tauscher  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The National Ignition Facility, the world's largest laser system, was dedicated at a ceremony on May 29, 2009 at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. These are the remarks by Congresswoman Ellen Tauscher, of California's 10th district, which includes Livermore.

Congresswoman Ellen Tauscher

2009-07-02T23:59:59.000Z

405

Laser shock-induced spalling and fragmentation in vanadium H. Jarmakani a  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

b Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA Received 1 January 2010; received of great signifi- cance to the successful operation of the National Ignition Facility (NIF). Protection

Meyers, Marc A.

406

Molten Salt Destruction of Energetic Material Wastes as an Alternative to Open Burning  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in conjunction with the Energetic Materials Center (a partnership of Lawrence Livermore and Sandia National Laboratories), is developing methods for the safe and envi...

Ravindra S. Upadhye; Csar O. Pruneda

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

407

Spent Shale Grouting of Abandoned In-Situ Oil Shale Retorts  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

for the grout. SPENT SHALE Oil shale, which is a low-gradeMineral Reactions in Colorado Oil Shale," Lawrence Livermore1978. of Decomposition of Colorado Oil Shale: II. Livermore

Fox, J.P.; Persoff, P.

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

408

PROCEEDINGS OF WORKSHOP ON THERMOMECHANICAL-HYDROCHEMICAL MODELING FOR A HARDROCK WASTE REPOSITORY. JULY 29-31, 1980. MARRIOTT INN, BERKELEY, CA  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

l Lab P. O. Box 808 Livermore, CA 94550 Gary D. Callahan RE/Lab P. O. Box 808 Livermore, CA 94550 Neville L. Carter RE/90A 1 Cyclotron Road Berkeley, CA 94720 Robbin G. Charlwood

Authors, Various

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

409

Supporting Information1 Geomicrobiological Redox Cycling of the Transuranic Element3  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

: Institute of Radiochemistry, Forschungszentrum Rossendorf, D01314-19 Dresden, Germany.20 6) Now at: Glenn T. Seaborg Institute, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,21 Livermore, California, 94550, USA.22 23

Burke, Ian

410

UCRL-MA-110662 PT I U  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

and questions which concern the EQ36 th dressed to the data base custodian: James W. Johnson, L-219 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory P.O. Box 808 Livermore, CA 94550...

411

Final LLNL Volume 1 - ES&H 2002.PDF  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance Office of the Secretary of Energy July 2002 ISM Volume I INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT INSPECTION OF ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY, AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT AT THE LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY Volume I July 2002 i INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT INSPECTION OF ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY, AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT AT THE LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY Volume I Table Of Contents Acronyms .........................................................................................................................................iii 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................1

412

High-Performance Refrigerator Using Novel Rotating Heat Exchanger  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Lead Performer: Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TNPartners:-- University of Maryland College Park, MD-- Sandia National Laboratory Livermore, CA

413

Acceleration Architectures for Bioinformatics (2010 JGI/ANL HPC Workshop)  

ScienceCinema (OSTI)

Maya Gokhale of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory presents at the JGI/Argonne HPC Workshop on January 26, 2010

Gokhale, Maya

2011-06-08T23:59:59.000Z

414

NuSTAR: Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Bill Craig, an astrophysicist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, describes the NASA NuSTAR mission, launched June 13, 2012.

Craig, Bill

2012-06-13T23:59:59.000Z

415

NIF & PS People  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Former LLNL Scientist Honored for Contributions to Laser Peening Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Industrial Partnerships Office recently honored former LLNL...

416

California's Energy Future - The View to 2050  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LDV Light-duty vehicles LED light emitting diode LWR Light water reactor NIF

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

417

Californias Energy Future: The View to 2050 - Summary Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LDV Light-duty vehicles LED light emitting diode LWR Light water reactor NIF

Yang, Christopher

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

418

June 11, 1999: National Ignition Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

June 11, 1999Secretary Richardson dedicates the National Ignition Facility target chamber at DOE's Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

419

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, National Security Technologies- December 2008  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Evaluation to determine whether the Livermore Operations is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

420

CoverSheet  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

group of scientists and engineers from National Security Tech- nologies (NSTec), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Los Alamos National Laboratory...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "lenox livermore maquoketa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

1861 The Meteoritical Society, 2008. Printed in USA. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 43, Nr 11, 18611877 (2008)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of Chicago, 5640 S. Ellis Ave., Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA 6Glenn T. Seaborg Institute, Lawrence Livermore

Grossman, Lawrence

422

EM Five-Year Plan (FY2008 - FY2012)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

- East; Ashtabula; Brookhaven National Laboratory; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; Energy Technology Engineering Center; Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory-Site 300;...

423

Implementation of an iterative matching scheme for the Kapchinskij-Vladimirskij equations in the WARP code  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

for Laser IFE and the Potential advantages of Fast Ignition.Ignition Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) employ lasers

Chilton, Sven H.

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

424

Implementation of an interactive matching scheme for the Kapchinskij-Vladimirskij equations in the WARP code  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

for Laser IFE and the Potential advantages of Fast Ignition.Ignition Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) employ lasers

Chilton, Sven H.

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

425

LULESH V.1.0  

Energy Science and Technology Software Center (OSTI)

002592WKSTN00 Livermore Unstructured Lagrange Explicit Shock Hydrodynamics https://computation.llnl.gov/casc/software.html

426

Energy and Technology Review  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Individual articles from this description of research activities at Lawrence Livermore Laboratories were prepared separately for the data base. (GTH)

Not Available

1983-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

427

University of California, San Diego UCSD-ENG-090 Fusion Division  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Jolla, CA 92093-0417, USA bUniversity of California, Los Angeles cLawrence Livermore National Laboratory Moir Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, CA 94550 Contents: 1. Introduction 2. Background] and the National Ignition Facility (NIF) [7] will further the development of ICF targets and drivers. While

Krstic, Miroslav

428

LLNL-PRES-662854 This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Convergence ratio of ~ 35 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Ignition on NIF requires compress pressures-ray: Produced by NIF laser at LLNL with an Internt'l team Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory A hohlraum indirectly d 1.8 MJ National Ignition inners outers at NIF #12;Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 4 Rosen

429

UCRL-TR-237219 Leveraging Python  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, and shall not be used for advertising by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. #12;Leveraging Python

Kamath, Chandrika

430

Scientific Breakeven for Fusion Energy For the past 40 years, the IFE fusion research community has adopted: achieving a fusion gain of 1 as  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

scientific breakeven." E. Moses, Status of the NIF Project, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report: "Laser fusion experiments, facilities, and diagnostics at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory", by H of 1 defines scientific breakeven. (This is therefore a Livermore definition!) The recent National

431

Progress towards ignition on the National Ignition Facility M. J. Edwards, P. K. Patel, J. D. Lindl, L. J. Atherton, S. H. Glenzer et al.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

; published online 30 July 2013) The National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, California 94550, USA 2 General Atomics, P to a target. NIF has been operational since March 2009. A variety of experiments have been completed

432

Fusion Energy Research at The National Ignition Facility: The Pursuit of the Ultimate Clean, Inexhaustible  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

at the" Lawrence Radiation Laboratory" In Livermore, California..." " #12;Presentation to MIT 13NIF-0709, Inexhaustible Energy Source" John D. Moody, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory" " Presented to: MIT ­ PSFC by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344 #12;A few memories of MIT physics

433

03-NIF Dedication: Norm Pattiz  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The National Ignition Facility, the world's largest laser system, was dedicated at a ceremony on May 29, 2009 at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. These are the remarks by Norm Pattiz, the chairman of Lawrence Livermore National Security, which manages Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for the U.S. Department of Energy.

Norm Pattiz

2009-07-02T23:59:59.000Z

434

Direct-drive cryogenic target implosion performance on OMEGAa... T. C. Sangster,b)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

at the National Ignition Facility NIF 3 currently under construction at the Lawrence Livermore Na- tional. Koch, R. A. Lerche, M. J. Moran, T. W. Phillips, and G. J. Schmid Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550 Received 11 November 2002; accepted 10 February 2003 Layered

435

Microsoft Word - S09IS004 _LLNL_PF_Authority_08262009a FINAL.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Inspections Inspection Report Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Protective Force Authority DOE/IG-0820 September 2009 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 4, 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Inspection Report on "Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Protective Force Authority" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy's (Department) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore) is a premier research and development institution supporting the Department's scientific, engineering, environmental, and national security activities. Livermore is

436

DOE-IG-0511.PDF  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 AUDIT REPORT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AT LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY JULY 2001 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE OF AUDIT SERVICES MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman (Signed) Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Research and Development at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory" BACKGROUND Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore), a major component of the Department of Energy's national laboratory system, has an annual Research and Development (R&D) budget of about $1 billion. The Department established a set of processes and procedures to ensure that Livermore's R&D efforts are

437

EIS-0157: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EIS-0157: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0157: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0157: Final Environmental Impact Statement Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore The proposed action for the purposes of the EIS is the continued operation of LLNL and SNL, Livermore(2), including near-term (within 5 to 10 years) proposed projects. The proposed action, therefore, necessarily includes current operations plus programmatic enhancements and facility modifications pursuant to research and development missions established for the Laboratories by Congress and the President. DOE/EIS-0157, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report for Continued Operation of

438

Wrb0007.PDF  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

WR-B-00-07 WR-B-00-07 AUDIT REPORT VEHICLE USE AT LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE OF AUDIT SERVICES SEPTEMBER 2000 September 20, 2000 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, OAKLAND OPERATIONS OFFICE FROM: Lawrence R. Ackerly, Regional Manager (Signed) Western Regional Audit Office Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Vehicle Use at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory" BACKGROUND The main site of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore) occupies one square mile. For on-site transportation of its 7,300 full-time equivalent employees, Livermore leased vehicles from

439

Inspection Report: IG-0628 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 8 Inspection Report: IG-0628 December 5, 2003 Internal Controls Over Classified Computers and Classified Removable Media at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Computers are used extensively in the full range of operations at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore), including processing classified national security information. Livermore reported an inventory of 86 classified laptop computers and 1,141 classified desktop computers as of March 2003. In addition, Livermore reported approximately 15,000 pieces of classified removable media. Department of Energy (DOE) policy requires strict inventory controls over classified computers and classified removable media. Inspection Report: IG-0628 More Documents & Publications Inspection Report: IG-0716

440

Inspection Report Follow-up Inspection on Security Clearance Terminations and Badge  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Inspection Report Inspection Report Follow-up Inspection on Security Clearance Terminations and Badge Retrieval at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory INS-L-12-02 March 2012 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 March 6, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR THE ASSOCIATE ADMINISTRATOR FOR DEFENSE NUCLEAR SECURITY MANAGER, LIVERMORE SITE OFFICE FROM: Sandra D. Bruce Assistant Inspector General for Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Inspection Report on "Follow-up Inspection on Security Clearance Terminations and Badge Retrieval at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy's Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore) is managed

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "lenox livermore maquoketa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Microsoft Word - LLNL Property Final 052809a Insp # S08IS011.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Inspections Inspection Report Personal Property Management at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory INS-O-09-03 May 2009 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 May 28, 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR THE ADMINISTRATOR, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM: Elise M. Ennis Assistant Inspector General for Inspections SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Inspection Report on "Personal Property Management at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy's (DOE's) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore) is a premier research and development institution for science and technology supporting the core mission of national security. According to Livermore, as of

442

Ordovician carbonate formation waters in the Illinois Basin: Chemical and isotopic evolution beneath a regional aquitard  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Formation waters from carbonate reservoirs in the upper Ordovician Galena Group of the Illinois Basin have been analyzed geochemically to study origin of salinity, chemical and isotopic evolution, and relation to paleohydrologic flow systems. These carbonate reservoirs underlie the Maquoketa Shale Group of Cincinnatian age, which forms a regional aquitard. Cl-Br relations and Na/Br-Cl/Br systematics indicate that initial brine salinity resulted from subaerial evaporation of seawater to a point not significantly beyond halite saturation. Subsequent dilution in the subsurface by meteoric waters is supported by delta D-delta O-18 covariance. Systematic relations between Sr-87/Sr-86 and 1/Sr suggest two distinct mixing events: introduction of a Sr-87 enriched fluid from a siliciclastic source, and a later event which only affected reservoir waters from the western shelf of the basin. The second mixing event is supported by covariance between Sr-87/Sr-86 and concentrations of cations and anions; covariance between Sr and O-D isotopes suggests that the event is related to meteoric water influx. Systematic geochemical relations in ordovician Galena Group formation waters have been preserved by the overlying Maquoketa shale aquitard. Comparison with results from previous studies indicates that waters from Silurian-Devonian carbonate strata evolved in a manner similar to yet distinct from that of the Ordovician carbonate waters, whereas waters from Mississippian-Pennsylvanian strata that overlie the New Albany Shale Group regional aquitard are marked by fundamentally different Cl-Br-Na and Sr isotope systematics. Evolution of these geochemical formation-water regimes apparently has been influenced significantly by paleohydrologic flow systems.

Stueber, A.M. (Illinois Univ., Edwardsville, IL (United States)); Walter, L.M. (Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (United States). Dept. of Geological Sciences)

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

443

Audit Report: OAS-M-13-06 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 Audit Report: OAS-M-13-06 August 8, 2013 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Use of Time and Materials Subcontracts The mission of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore) is to strengthen the United States' security through development and application of science and technology to enhance the Nation's defense, reduce the global threat from terrorism and weapons of mass destruction, and respond to scientific issues of national importance. Livermore is operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the Department of Energy's (Department) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). In accomplishing its mission, Livermore uses a variety of subcontracting types, including time and materials subcontracts. We found that Livermore had not always procured services through time and

444

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

71 - 17780 of 26,764 results. 71 - 17780 of 26,764 results. Page EA-1800: DOE's Proposed Financial Assistance to Illinois for the Monarch Warren County Wind Turbine Project, Lenox Township, Warren County, Illinois The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has provided Federal funding to the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity (DCEO) under the State Energy Program (SEP). DCEO is seeking to provide $5 million of its SEP funds to Monarch Wind Power (MWP), who would use these funds for the design, permitting, and construction of 12, 1.6-megawatt wind turbines, for a combined generation capacity of 19.2 megawatts. http://energy.gov/nepa/ea-1800-doe-s-proposed-financial-assistance-illinois-monarch-warren-county-wind-turbine-project Page EA-1831: Phase II ICCS Initiative Funding Award for Calera

445

Latest Documents and Notices | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 11, 2011 August 11, 2011 EA-1800: Finding of No Significant Impact Monarch Warren County Wind Turbine Project Lenox Township Warren County, Illinois July 31, 2011 EA-1617: Draft Environmental Assessment Lovell-Yellowtail and Basin-Lovell Transmission Line Rebuild Project July 13, 2011 EA-1871: Finding of No Significant Impact Energy Efficiency Design Standards for New Federal Commercial and Multi-Family High-Rise Residential Buildings and New Federal Low-Rise Residential Buildings July 8, 2011 EIS-0240-SA-01: Supplement Analysis Disposition of Surplus Highly Enriched Uranium July 6, 2011 EIS-0480: Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan for the Operation of Glen Canyon Dam, AZ June 24, 2011 EA-1779: Draft Environmental Assessment

446

EA-1800: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1800: Finding of No Significant Impact Monarch Warren County Wind Turbine Project Lenox Township Warren County, Illinois The U.S. Department of Energy provided Federal funding appropriated under the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act 0(2009 to the Illinois Department ofComrnerce and Economic Opportunity (DeEO) under the State Energy Program (SEP). DeEO proposes to provide approximately $5 million of its SEP funds to Monarch Wind Power (MWP) for the Monarch Warren County Wind Turbine Project (MWTP). DOE's Proposed Action is to authorize the expenditure of Federal funding under State Energy Program to design, permit, and construct a l2·turbine, 19.2 megawatt wind energy facility south of Monmouth, Illinois. Each wind turbine would have a hub height of

447

Golden Field Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT MONARCH WARREN COUNTY WIND TURBINE PROJECT LENOX TOWNSIDP, WARREN COUNTY, IL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Golden Field Office ACTION: Finding orNo Significant Impact (FONS!) DOEIEA-JSOO SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) provided Federal funding appropriated under the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act 0(2009 to the Illinois Department ofComrnerce and Econom ic Opportunity (DeEO) under the State Energy Program (SEP). DeEO proposes to provide approximately $5 million of its SEP funds to Monarch Wind Power (MWP) for the Monarch Warren County Wind Turbine Project (MWTP). DOE's Proposed Action is to authorize the expenditure of Federal funding under State Energy Program to design, permit, and construct

448

EA-1800: Notice of Availability of the Finding of No Significant Impact |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Notice of Availability of the Finding of No Significant Notice of Availability of the Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1800: Notice of Availability of the Finding of No Significant Impact Monarch Warren County Wind Turbine Project The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has issued a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) based on the completion of an Environmental Assessment (EA) that analyzed the potential environmental impacts associated with the: MONARCH WARREN COUNTY WIND TURBINE PROJECT, LENOX TOWNSHIP, WARREN COUNTY, ILLINOIS (DOE/EA - 1800) DOE's Golden Field Office prepared an EA in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Based on the analysis contained in the EA and commitments made by the project proponent, DOE has determined that providing funding for the Monarch Warren County

449

EA-1800: Draft Environmental Assessment | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Draft Environmental Assessment Draft Environmental Assessment EA-1800: Draft Environmental Assessment Monarch Warren County Wind Turbine Project, Lenox Township, Warren County, Illinois The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has provided Federal funding to the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity (DCEO) under the State Energy Program (SEP). DCEO is seeking to provide $5 million of its SEP funds to Monarch Wind Power (MWP), who would use these funds for the design, permitting and construction of 12, 1.6- megawatt wind turbines, for a combined generation capacity of 19.2 megawatts. This EA provides DOE and other decisionmakers the information needed to make an informed decision about the installation, operation, and eventual decommissioning of the proposed wind project. The EA evaluates the potential individual and

450

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

71 - 5280 of 28,560 results. 71 - 5280 of 28,560 results. Article DOE Provides up to $51.8 Million to Modernize the U.S. Electric Grid System Superconductor Research Crucial to Improving Power Delivery Equipment http://energy.gov/articles/doe-provides-518-million-modernize-us-electric-grid-system Download EA-1800: Draft Environmental Assessment Monarch Warren County Wind Turbine Project, Lenox Township, Warren County, Illinois http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/ea-1800-draft-environmental-assessment Download EA-1640: Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Transfer of Land and Facilities within the East Tennessee Technology Park and Surrounding Area, Oak Ridge, Tennessee http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/ea-1640-final-environmental-assessment-and-finding-no-significant-impact

451

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

81 - 2690 of 26,777 results. 81 - 2690 of 26,777 results. Download EA-1800: Finding of No Significant Impact Monarch Warren County Wind Turbine Project Lenox Township Warren County, Illinois http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/ea-1800-finding-no-significant-impact Rebate Entergy Arkansas- Commercial and Industrial Energy Efficiency Programs Entergy Arkansas has several programs to help commercial and industrial customers increase the energy efficiency of eligible facilities. http://energy.gov/savings/entergy-arkansas-commercial-and-industrial-energy-efficiency-programs Download A History of the Atomic Energy Commission A History of the Atomic Energy Commission - written by Alice L. BuckWashington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy, July 1983. 41 pp. http://energy.gov/management/downloads/history-atomic-energy-commission

452

2011 LLNL Template  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

PRES-555917 PRES-555917 This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC Roger D. Aines Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Award: 09/CJ000/05/01 (LLNS) DE---AR0000099 (University of Illinois and Babcock & Wilcox) Lead Recipient: Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS) Project Title: Catalytic Improvement of Solvent Capture Systems Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-555917 2 WHY?  Enable lower energy solvent systems WHAT?  Rugged synthetic catalysts  Surface area enhancement Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-555917 3 We developed a family of catalysts that speed capture in hindered amines and carbonates

453

Inspection Report: INS-L-11-05 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Inspection Report: INS-L-11-05 Inspection Report: INS-L-11-05 Inspection Report: INS-L-11-05 September 21, 2011 Fixed Monthly Living Expense Payments at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore) is a Department of Energy (Department) laboratory managed and operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the Department's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). Livermore's mission is to ensure the safety and security of the nation through applied science and technology. In certain circumstances, Livermore utilizes subcontractors to obtain specialized skill sets that are not available locally. To minimize travel expenses, some subcontractors receive fixed monthly living expenses (FMLE), which are negotiated travel reimbursements that provide a fixed monthly payment to

454

Slide 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Laboratory Laboratory Matthew Myrick (myrick3@llnl.gov) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P. O. Box 808, Livermore, CA 94551 This work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344 Mining Proxy Logs: Finding Needles In Haystacks 2010-05-19 2 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Disclaimer  Our security infrastructure is a work in progress * This presentation is for educational purposes * This discussion pertains to our "Unclassified" environment ONLY * Hopefully we can make things better by learning from each other If you see problems please say something 3 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Have Fun! 4 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

455

PowerPoint Presentation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LL-WCI-U-2011-522763 Monthly Performance Review Director's Office March 21, 2008 Monthly Performance Weapons and Complex Integration (WCI) High Energy Density Experiments on NIF in FY2011 (A Joint WCI-NIF Success) Presented to SEAB Oct. 12, 2011 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by

456

Microsoft Word - LLNL 2011 SA_8_1.docx  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

National Nuclear Security Administration National Nuclear Security Administration Livermore Site Office Livermore, California SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS of the 2005 Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement For Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Volume I: Main Report AUGUST 2011 DOE/EIS-0348-SA-03 i CONTENTS NOTATION.............................................................................................................................. v SUMMARY...........................................................................................................................S-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose and Need............................................................................................

457

Microsoft Word - LLNL 2011 CRD_8_1.docx  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

National Nuclear Security Administration National Nuclear Security Administration Livermore Site Office Livermore, California SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS of the 2005 Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement For Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory VOLUME II: Comment Response Document AUGUST 2011 DOE/EIS-0348-SA-03 ii (This page intentionally left blank.) iii Contents NOTATIONS..................................................................................................................... iv Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................ iv Units of Measure............................................................................................................ vi 1.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................

458

Supplement Analysis of the 2005 Site-Wide EIS  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Livermore Site Office Livermore, California SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS of the 2005 Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement For Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Volume I: Main Report AUGUST 2011 DOE/EIS-0348-SA-03 i CONTENTS NOTATION.............................................................................................................................. v SUMMARY...........................................................................................................................S-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose and Need............................................................................................

459

LLNL Chronic Beryllium Disease Protection Program Effectiveness Review, March 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

LLNL-2011-03-25 LLNL-2011-03-25 Site: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program Effectiveness Review Dates of Activity : 03/14/2011 - 03/25/2011 Report Preparer: Marvin Mielke Activity Description/Purpose: The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and the Livermore Site Office (LSO) chartered a team to conduct an effectiveness review of the issues identified with the LLNL Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program (CBDPP). The team included members and observers from LLNL, LSO, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), and the

460

Microsoft Word - 802.11i Rec Practices _KM-BL final edit ver 10_.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Securing WLANs Securing WLANs using 802.11i Draft Recommended Practice February 2007 Securing WLANs using 802.11i Draft Author: Ken Masica, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory February 2007 for Idaho National Laboratory Critical Infrastructure Protection Center Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415 Prepared by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Recommended Practices Guide Securing WLANs using 802.11i Ken Masica Vulnerability & Risk Assessment Program (VRAP) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) for DHS US CERT Control Systems Security Program (CSSP) October 2006 This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract W- 7405-Eng-48.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "lenox livermore maquoketa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

California | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

April 29, 2005 April 29, 2005 EIS-0348: Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplement Stockpile Stewardship and Management April 29, 2005 EIS-0348: Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplement Stockpile Stewardship and Management Tables and Figures April 29, 2005 EIS-0348: Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplement Stockpile Stewardship and Management Volume III, Appendices E to P April 29, 2005 EIS-0348: Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplement Stockpile Stewardship and Management

462

Microsoft Word - LLNLFArmsFinalRpt092503signedvicki.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Inspection Report Firearms Internal Controls at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory DOE/IG-0621 September 2003 FIREARMS INTERNAL CONTROLS AT THE LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY FIREARMS INTERNAL CONTROLS AT THE LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY FIREARMS INTERNAL CONTROLS AT THE LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW Introduction and Objective 1 Observations and Conclusions 1 DETAILS OF FINDINGS 2 Property Inventory 2 Monthly Inventories 3 RECOMMENDATIONS 4 MANAGEMENT COMMENTS 4 INSPECTOR COMMENTS 4 APPENDICES A. Scope and Methodology 6 B. Management Comments 7 Overview Page 1 Inspection of Firearms Internal Controls at

463

The National Labs on Flickr | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Flickr Flickr The National Labs on Flickr The interior of the National Ignition Facility target chamber at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The service module carrying technicians can be seen on the left. The target positioner, which holds the target, is on the right. | Photo courtesy of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The interior of the National Ignition Facility target chamber at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The service module carrying technicians can be seen on the left. The target positioner, which holds the target, is on the right. | Photo courtesy of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. EXPLORE THE NATIONAL LABS ON FLICKR Ames Laboratory Argonne National Laboratory Brookhaven National Laboratory Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory

464

Assessment Report: OAS-V-14-14 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Assessment Report: OAS-V-14-14 August 13, 2014 Assessment of Audit Coverage of Cost Allowability for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Department of Energy...

465

NDCX-II, an Induction Linac for HEDP and IFE Research  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Livermore, CA, U.S.A, 3 PPPL, Princeton, NJ, U.S.A. sourceFEPS) fabricated by PPPL similar to those successfully

Kwan, J.W.

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

466

Fuel Cell Product Certification/Listing Lessons Learned  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Slides from the U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen Component and System Qualification Workshop held November 4, 2010 in Livermore, CA.

467

Certification and Listing Process and Procedures Workshop  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Slides from the U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen Component and System Qualification Workshop held November 4, 2010 in Livermore, CA.

468

PROCEEDINGS OF THE SYMPOSIUM COMMEMORATING THE 25th ANNIVERSARY OF ELEMENTS 97 and 98 HELD ON JAN. 20, 1975  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Berkelium and Californium Paul R. Fields, Argonne NationalCarnall (with S. Fried), Argonne National Laboratory . . . .recovery programs at Argonne, Berkeley, Livermore, Los

Seaborg, Glenn T.

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

469

E-Print Network 3.0 - ale accidentului nuclear Sample Search...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Lagrangian Eulerian (ALE Source: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Magnetic Fusion Energy Program Collection: Plasma Physics and Fusion 5 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR...

470

Fact Sheet LLNS PNOV WEA-2014-03  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Sulfuric Acid Burn Event at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory On September 25, 2014, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) issued a Preliminary Notice of...

471

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Chemical Kinetic Models for Advanced Engine Combustion  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation given by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about...

472

Women @ Energy: Terri Quinn | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

consisting of three divisions with over 400 technical staff working in high-performance computing, computer security, and IT at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory....

473

Women @ Energy: Darlene Yazzie | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Robyne Teshlich Robin Goldstone is a computer scientist working in the High Performance Computing (HPC) division at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). Women @...

474

Webinar: Delivering Transformational HPC Solutions to Industry  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Dr. Frederick Streitz, director of the High Performance Computing Innovation Center, discusses Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory computational capabilities and expertise available to industry in this webinar.

Streitz, Frederick

2014-04-15T23:59:59.000Z

475

Women @ Energy: Lisa Belk | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

consisting of three divisions with over 400 technical staff working in high-performance computing, computer security, and IT at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory....

476

Women @ Energy: Bing Liu | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Jessie Gaylord Robin Goldstone is a computer scientist working in the High Performance Computing (HPC) division at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). Women @...

477

Visiting Strong, Smart, and Bold Girls at Girls Inc. | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

consisting of three divisions with over 400 technical staff working in high-performance computing, computer security, and IT at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory....

478

Women @ Energy: Rene Breyer | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

consisting of three divisions with over 400 technical staff working in high-performance computing, computer security, and IT at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory....

479

Women @ Energy: Kimberly Cupps | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories (LLNL). Kimberly leads a staff of high performance computing specialists in delivering computing cycles, system software, services,...

480

Women @ Energy: Marisol Gamboa | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Related Articles Robin Goldstone is a computer scientist working in the High Performance Computing (HPC) division at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). Women @...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "lenox livermore maquoketa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Women @ Energy: Karen Schuchardt | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

consisting of three divisions with over 400 technical staff working in high-performance computing, computer security, and IT at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory....

482

Women @ Energy: Anh Tu Quach | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

consisting of three divisions with over 400 technical staff working in high-performance computing, computer security, and IT at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory....

483

Forward Thinking: Women-led Team Plans for National Labs' Future...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Clean Energy Careers Robin Goldstone is a computer scientist working in the High Performance Computing (HPC) division at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). Women @...

484

Women @ Energy: Lila Chase | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Jeene Villanueva Robin Goldstone is a computer scientist working in the High Performance Computing (HPC) division at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). Women @...

485

December 3, 2013 SEAB Meeting Minutes  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This is a brief summary of the December 3, 2013 meeting of the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board held at Lawrence Livermore National Lab.

486

Gifting Our Children with Energy Awareness | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

consisting of three divisions with over 400 technical staff working in high-performance computing, computer security, and IT at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory....

487

Women @ Energy | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

explore STEM topics." Robin Goldstone is a computer scientist working in the High Performance Computing (HPC) division at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). Women @...

488

Webinar: Delivering Transformational HPC Solutions to Industry  

ScienceCinema (OSTI)

Dr. Frederick Streitz, director of the High Performance Computing Innovation Center, discusses Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory computational capabilities and expertise available to industry in this webinar.

Streitz, Frederick

2014-07-22T23:59:59.000Z

489

Sequoia supercomputer tops Graph 500 | National Nuclear Security...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

on Graph 500 and new techniques for solving large graph problems on small high performance computing (HPC) systems, all the way down to a single server. Lawrence Livermore's...

490

NNSA Highlights 2014 Achievements | National Nuclear Security...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Lawrence Livermore national labs (CORAL) to accelerate the development of high performance computing. http:www.nnsa.energy.govblogllnl-deliver-next-generation-supercomputer...

491

LLNL to deliver next-generation supercomputer | National Nuclear...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Lawrence Livermore national labs (CORAL) to accelerate the development of high performance computing. CORAL will result in delivery to each laboratory of a supercomputer...

492

SciTech Connect: Microscopic Theory of Fission  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Relation: Conference: Presented at: Compound Nuclear Reactions and Related Topics, Fish Camp, CA, United States, Oct 22 - Oct 26, 2007 Research Org: Lawrence Livermore...

493

E-Print Network 3.0 - area tonopah test Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Test Range Manager. CI36 - REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESS TO GOVERNMENT SITES Permission to enter... Security Division at Livermore; Tonopah ... Source: Fuerschbach, Phillip - Joining...

494

August 2014 | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

- Sandia, Argonne, Brookhaven, Lawrence Berkeley, Lawrence Livermore, Los Alamos, Oak Ridge, Pacific Northwest - along with the National Center for Atmospheric Research,...

495

New partnership uses advanced computer science modeling to address...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

- Sandia, Argonne, Brookhaven, Lawrence Berkeley, Lawrence Livermore, Los Alamos, Oak Ridge, Pacific Northwest - along with the National Center for Atmospheric Research,...

496

2008 Annual Merit Review Results Summary - 18. Cross-Reference...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Livermore National Laboratory) -- LLNL APBF Fuels Technologies 5-34 Adams, Don (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) -- Uncluttered Rotor PM Machine, Axially Excited...

497

Fuel Tank Manufacturing, Testing, Field Performance, and Certification  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Slides from the U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen Component and System Qualification Workshop held November 4, 2010 in Livermore, CA.

498

January2005 NNSANews  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

than current designs and should significantly reduce the cost-of-energy of wind turbines at low-wind-speed sites. At Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, researchers...

499

CSA International Certification Discussion Hydrogen Technology Workshop  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Slides from the U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen Component and System Qualification Workshop held November 4, 2010 in Livermore, CA.

500

Sequoia Ranked as Fastest Supercomputer in the World | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

The list released June 18 at the International Supercomputing Conference in Hamburg, Germany, ranked Sequoia at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory as the world's most...