National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for legacy management practices

  1. Sustainable Disposal Cell Covers: Legacy Management Practices,

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Improvements, and Long-Term Performance | Department of Energy Sustainable Disposal Cell Covers: Legacy Management Practices, Improvements, and Long-Term Performance Sustainable Disposal Cell Covers: Legacy Management Practices, Improvements, and Long-Term Performance Sustainable Disposal Cell Covers: Legacy Management Practices, Improvements, and Long-Term Performance PDF icon Sustainable Disposal Cell Covers: Legacy Management Practices, Improvements, and Long-Term Performance More

  2. Office of Legacy Management

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Energy Office of Legacy Management JUL 1 0 2008 Alonso Ramirez, Scientific Director EI Verde Research Station Institute for Tropical Ecosystem Studies University of Puerto Rico...

  3. COMPREHENSIVE LEGACY MANAGEMENT

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Fernald Preserve, Fernald, Ohio Comprehensive Legacy Management and Institutional Controls Plan Volumes I and II January 2015 LMS/FER/S03496-8.0 Revision 8.0 Final This page intentionally left blank LMS/FER/S03496-8.0 Comprehensive Legacy Management and Institutional Controls Plan Volumes I and II Fernald Preserve Fernald, Ohio January 2015 Revision 8 Final This page intentionally left blank Volume I Legacy Management Plan January 2015 U.S. Department of Energy Revision 8 Final This page

  4. Legacy Management Sites | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    to managing its responsibilities associated with the environmental legacy of World War II and the Cold War. This legacy includes radioactive and chemical waste, environmental...

  5. Legacy Management FUSRAP Sites | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Legacy Management FUSRAP Sites Legacy Management FUSRAP Sites Legacy Management FUSRAP Sites Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance (LTS&M) of Remediated FUSRAP Sites The DOE Office of Legacy Management (LM) established LTS&M requirements for remediated FUSRAP sites. DOE evaluates the final site conditions of a remediated site on the basis of risk for different future uses. DOE then confirms that LTS&M requirements will maintain protectiveness. Most Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial

  6. 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Legacy Management

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2012 and 2013 within Legacy Management.

  7. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Legacy Management | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Legacy Management Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Legacy Management Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Legacy Mangement. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD August 26, 2014 CX-012726: Categorical Exclusion Determination Installation and Redeveloment of Groundwater Monitoring Wells at the4 Salmon, Mississippi Site CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 41877 Location(s): Mississippi Offices(s): Legacy Management July 10, 2014 CX-012400: Categorical Exclusion Determination Vapor

  8. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Ashtabula

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    for maintaining records for the Ashtabula site was transferred to DOE's Office of Legacy Management in 2010. The site requires records management and stakeholder support. For...

  9. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- CEER

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    for maintaining records for the CEER site transferred to DOE's Office of Legacy Management in 2006. The site requires records management and stakeholder support. For...

  10. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Bonus

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    of the DOE Defense Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D) Program, the Office of Legacy Management manages the Boiling Nuclear Superheater (BONUS) Decommissioned Reactor Site...

  11. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Fernald

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Ohio Fernald Preserve, Ohio Key Documents and Links Fernald Preserve, Harrison, Ohio, Fact Sheet pdf_icon STAKEHOLDER REVIEW: Draft 2016 Comprehensive Legacy Management and Institutional Controls Plan (LMICP)-Revision 9; includes Summary of Significant Changes pdf_icon 2015 Comprehensive Legacy Management and Institutional Controls Plan (LMICP): Volume I-Legacy Management Plan pdf_icon 2015 Volume II-Institutional Controls Plan pdf_icon 2015 Attachment A pdf_icon 2015 Attachment B pdf_icon 2015

  12. Office of Legacy Management | Department of Energy

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Office of Legacy Management Abandoned Uranium Mines Abandoned Uranium Mines Read more Amchitka, Alaska, Site Amchitka, Alaska, Site Read more Mexican Hat, Utah, Disposal Site...

  13. 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Legacy Management (LM) | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Legacy Management (LM) 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Legacy Management (LM) The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2011 and 2012 within Legacy Management (LM). PDF icon 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Legacy Management (LM) More Documents & Publications 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Office of Legacy Management (LM), Grand Junction (See LM APS) 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Office of Legacy Management 2012

  14. 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Office of Legacy Management...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Summary for Legacy Management (LM) 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Office of Legacy Management 2012 Independent Communication and Outreach Stakeholder Satisfaction Survey...

  15. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Falls

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Texas Falls City, Texas, Disposal Site UMTRCA Title I site falls_map The Falls City Disposal Site, an Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I disposal site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Falls City site, view the fact

  16. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Hallam

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Nebraska Hallam, Nebraska, Decommissioned Reactor Site A D&D Program Site hallam_map As part of the DOE Defense Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D) Program, the Office of Legacy Management manages the Hallam Decommissioned Reactor Site and ensures compliance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental protection laws and regulations, executive orders, and internal DOE policies. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine

  17. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Lowman

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Idaho Lowman, Idaho, Disposal Site UMTRCA Title I site lowman_map The Lowman disposal site, a Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I disposal site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Lowman site, view the fact sheet. Site

  18. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- AMB

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    New Mexico Ambrosia Lake, New Mexico, Disposal Site UMTRCA Title I site ambr_map The Ambrosia Lake Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I disposal site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Ambrosia Lake site, view the fact

  19. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Burrell

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Pennsylvania Burrell, Pennsylvania, Disposal Site UMTRCA Title I site bur_map The Burrell Disposal site, a Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I disposal site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Burrell site, view the fact

  20. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Canon

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Pennsylvania Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, Disposal Site UMTRCA Title I site can_map The Canonsburg disposal site, a Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I disposal site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Canonsburg site, view

  1. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Maybell

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Maybell, Colorado, Disposal Site UMTRCA Title I site maybell_map The Maybell Disposal Site, a Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I disposal site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Maybell site, view the fact sheet. Site

  2. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Piqua

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Ohio Piqua, Ohio, Decommissioned Reactor Site A D&D Program Site piqua_map As part of the DOE Defense Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D) Program, the Office of Legacy Management manages the Piqua Decommissioned Reactor Site and ensures compliance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental protection laws and regulations, executive orders, and internal DOE policies. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and

  3. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Riverton

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Wyoming Riverton, Wyoming, Processing Site An UMTRCA Title I site riverton_map The Riverton Processing Site, an Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Riverton site, view the fact sheet.

  4. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Ship

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    New Mexico Shiprock, New Mexico, Disposal Site UMTRCA Title I site shiprock_map The Shiprock Disposal Site, an Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I disposal site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Shiprock site, view the

  5. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Spook

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Wyoming Spook, Wyoming, Disposal Site UMTRCA Title I site spook_map The Spook disposal site, a Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I disposal site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Spook site, view the fact sheet. Site

  6. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Tuba

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Arizona Tuba City, Arizona, Disposal Site UMTRCA Title I site tuba_map The Tuba City Disposal Site, an Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I disposal site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Tuba City site, view the fact

  7. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- GJO

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Junction Colorado, Site A D&D Program Site gjo_map As part of the DOE Defense Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D) Program, the Office of Legacy Management manages the Grand Junction Site and ensures compliance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental protection laws and regulations, executive orders, and internal DOE policies. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities,

  8. 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Office of Legacy Management |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Legacy Management 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Office of Legacy Management The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2013 and 2014 within the Office of Legacy Management . PDF icon LM_NEPA-APS-2013.pdf More Documents & Publications LM Annual NEPA Planning Summary 2014 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Legacy Management (LM) 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Office of Legacy Management (LM), Grand Junction (See

  9. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Directions

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Mailing: U.S. Department of Energy 10995 Hamilton-Cleves Hwy. Harrison, OH 45030 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management Contractor Navarro Research and Engineering, ...

  10. LM-04-XXXX Office of Legacy Management

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    LM-04-XXXX Office of Legacy Management Information and Records Management Transition Guidance March 2004 LM Information and Records Management Transition Guidance March 2004 Contents Page ii Table of Contents Page Executive Summary................................................................................................................... iii 1.0 Introduction and Purpose ................................................................................................... 1 2.0 The Life Cycle

  11. Legacy Management Contacts | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Legacy Management Contacts Legacy Management Contacts Title Name Phone Fax LM Director David Geiser (202) 586-7550 (202) 586-8403 Human Resource Management Patricia Poole-Shirriel Team Leader (202) 586-0402 (202) 586-1540 Office of Business Operations Acting Director Tom Pauling (202) 586-1782 (202) 586-1540 Benefits Continuity Team Patrick Ring Team Leader (202) 586-1835 (202) 586-1540 Planning, Budget, and Acquisition Team Jane Powell Team Leader (202) 586-3924 (202) 586-1540 Archives and

  12. Managing Legacy Records for Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Sites | Department of Energy Managing Legacy Records for Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Sites Managing Legacy Records for Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Sites Managing Legacy Records for Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Sites (Waste Management Conference 2008) PDF icon Managing Legacy Records for Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Sites More Documents & Publications FUSRAP Overview Recent Developments in DOE FUSRAP Process for

  13. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Geothermal

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Geothermal Test Facility, California A Oakland Operations Office site geothermal_map The Geothermal Test Facility site was a research laboratory formerly operated under the DOE Oakland Operations Office, California. After remediation, the site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2005. The site requires records management and stakeholder support. For more information about the Geothermal Test

  14. Legacy Management 2011-2020 Strategic Plan | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Legacy Management 2011-2020 Strategic Plan Legacy Management 2011-2020 Strategic Plan Topic: Tom Longo DOE, Provided Information on DOEs Long Term Stewardship Plan and Office of Legacy Management. PDF icon LM Strategic Plan - August 13, 2014 More Documents & Publications Update on DOE/NNSA Long Term Stewardship Programs Site Transition Summary: Clean-up Completion to Long Term Stewardship Office of Legacy Management the First Decade 2003-2013

  15. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- GJD

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Disposal Site UMTRCA Title I site gjd_map The Grand Junction disposal site is a Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I site. Responsibility for custody and long-term management of the site transferred to DOE's Office of Legacy Management in 2003. Management responsibilities include routine inspection and maintenance of the disposal site, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Grand Junction disposal site, view the fact sheet.

  16. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- GJP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Processing Site UMTRCA Title I site gjp_map The Grand Junction processing site is a Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I site. Responsibility for management and long-term custody of the site's contaminated groundwater transferred to DOE's Office of Legacy Management in 2003. Management requirements include routine inspection and maintenance of groundwater monitoring wells, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Grand Junction

  17. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Chariot

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Alaska Chariot, Alaska, Site A Nevada Offsite chariotmap The DOE Office of Legacy Management assumed responsibility for long-term surveillance and maintenance at the Chariot Site in 2008. The Chariot site requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Chariot site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and Links Contact Us

  18. Comprehensive Legacy Management and Institutional Controls Plan

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Attachment A Operations and Maintenance Master Plan for Aquifer Restoration and Wastewater Treatment This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy Comprehensive Legacy Management and Institutional Controls Plan Doc. No. S03496-8.0-Final Attachment A-Operations and Maintenance Master Plan January 2015 Page i Contents Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................................v 1.0 Introduction

  19. Managing Legacy Materials at WETF | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Legacy Materials at WETF Managing Legacy Materials at WETF Presentation from the 32nd Tritium Focus Group Meeting held in Germantown, Maryland on April 23-25, 2013. PDF icon Managing Legacy Materials at WETF More Documents & Publications Enterprise Assessments Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - November 2014 DOE-HDBK-1129-2008 FPD's Perspective Photos - Los Alamos National Labratory - NISA

  20. Energy Department Awards Small Business Contract for Legacy Management...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    health and the environment at over 100 legacy sites across the country," Michael Owen, Director of the Office of Legacy Management, said. "We look forward to working with our...

  1. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Park

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    West Virginia Parkersburg, West Virginia, Disposal Site A Nuclear Waste Policy Act Section 151 Site parkersburg_map The Parkersburg Disposal Site was remediated by the owner under the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Site Decommissioning Management Program and transferred to the federal government under Section 151 of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and

  2. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- MURR

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Missouri Missouri University Research Reactor (MURR), Missouri, Site An Oakland Operations Office site murr_map The Missouri University Research Reactor (MURR) site was a research laboratory formerly operated under the DOE Oakland Operations Office, California. After remediation, the site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2005. The site requires records management and stakeholder support. For more information about the MURR site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and Links

  3. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- CERCLA Home

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Office of Site Operations > Programs & Facilities > CERCLA Home Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Search CERCLA Collections Request Documents CERCLA Help What is CERCLA? The Office of Legacy Management currently manages seven sites where remediation was conducted in accordance with Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and/or Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) regulations. These sites were

  4. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Maxey

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Kentucky Maxey Flats, Kentucky, Site A CERCLA site maxey_map Remediation at the Maxey Flats site was conducted in accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) regulations. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2004 and requires records-related activities and stakeholder support. For more information about the Maxey Flats site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and Links Contact Us Last Updated: 8/5

  5. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Pinellas

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Florida Pinellas County, Florida, Site Applying Innovative Solutions to Environmental Restoration A CERCLA and/or RCRA Site pinellas_map Remediation at the Pinellas County Site was conducted in accordance with Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and/or Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) regulations. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2004 and requires operation and maintenance of remedial action systems, routine

  6. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Salmon2

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Mississippi Salmon, Mississippi, Site A Nevada Offsite salmon_map The DOE Office of Legacy Management assumed responsibility for long-term surveillance and maintenance at the Salmon Site in 2008. Responsibilities include long-term surveillance and maintenance of the subsurface where residue remains from the nuclear detonation tests conducted during the Cold War-era, maintaining institutional controls, archiving records, and responding to stakeholder inquiries. For more information about the

  7. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Sherwood

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Washington Sherwood, Washington, Disposal Site UMTRCA Title II site sherwood_map The Sherwood Disposal Site was a uranium processing site addressed by Title II of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA). The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and is administered under the provisions of a general NRC license. The site requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Sherwood

  8. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Amchitka

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Alaska Amchitka, Alaska, Site A Nevada Offsite amchitkamap2.jpg The DOE Office of Legacy Management assumed responsibility for all activities associated with subsurface completion and long-term surveillance and maintenance at the Amchitka site in 2008. The Amchitka site requires records-related activities, stakeholder support, and an inspection and maintenance trip every 5 years. For more information about the Amchitka site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and Links Contact Us Amchitka

  9. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Blue

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Mexico Bluewater, New Mexico, Disposal Site UMTRCA Title II site bluewater_map The Bluewater disposal site was a uranium-ore-processing site addressed by Title II of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA). The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and is administered under the provisions of a general NRC license. The site requires routine inspection and maintenance, groundwater monitoring, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more

  10. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Central

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Nevada Central Nevada Test Area (CNTA), Nevada, Site A Nevada Offsite centralmap The DOE Office of Legacy Management assumed responsibility for long-term surveillance and maintenance at the Central Nevada Test Area (CNTA) Site in 2008. The CNTA site requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the CNTA site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and Links Contact Us Central Nevada Test Area (CNTA) Site Mapping and

  11. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Fernald

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Fernald Preserve, Ohio A CERCLA site Fernald Aerial Remediation at the Fernald Preserve was conducted in accordance with Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) regulations. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2006 and requires operation and maintenance of remedial action systems, environmental monitoring, routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Fernald

  12. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Gasbuggy

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    New Mexico Gasbuggy, New Mexico, Site A Nevada Offsite gasbuggy_map The DOE Office of Legacy Management assumed responsibility for long-term surveillance and maintenance at the Gasbuggy Site in 2008. The Gasbuggy site requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Gasbuggy site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and Links Contact Us Gasbuggy Site Mapping and Monitoring (GEMS) Last Updated: 2/2

  13. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Gnome

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    New Mexico Gnome-Coach, New Mexico, Site A Nevada Offsite gnomemap The DOE Office of Legacy Management assumed responsibility for long-term surveillance and maintenance at the Gnome-Coach Site in 2008. The Gnome-Coach site requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Gnome-Coach site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and Links Contact Us Gnome-Coach Site Mapping and Monitoring (GEMS)

  14. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- LEHR

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    California Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research (LEHR), California, Site A CERCLA site lehr_map Remediation at the Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research (LEHR) site was conducted in accordance with Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) regulations. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2006 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about

  15. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Lbar

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    New Mexico L-Bar, New Mexico, Disposal Site UMTRCA Title II site lbar_map The L-Bar disposal site was a uranium-ore-processing site addressed by Title II of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA). The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and is administered under the provisions of a general NRC license. The site requires routine inspection and maintenance, groundwater monitoring, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information

  16. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Monticello

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Utah Monticello, Utah, Disposal and Processing Sites A CERCLA and/or RCRA Site monticello_map Remediation at the Monticello Sites was conducted in accordance with Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and/or Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) regulations. The sites transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and require operation and maintenance of remedial action systems, routine inspection and maintenance, records-related

  17. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Mound Site

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Ohio Mound, Ohio, Site A CERCLA and/or RCRA Site Mound2014 Remediation of the Mound, Ohio, Site was conducted in accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). The site long-term monitoring responsibility transferred to the Office of Legacy Management(LM) in 2010 and requires operation and maintenance of a pump and treatment system, groundwater monitoring, institutional controls monitoring, records-related activities, and stakeholder support.

  18. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Rio

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Colorado Rio Blanco, Colorado, Site A Nevada Offsite rioblanco_map The DOE Office of Legacy Management assumed responsibility for long-term surveillance and maintenance at the Rio Blanco site in 2008. The Rio Blanco site requires monitoring of nearby natural gas wells, groundwater wells, and surface water locations; routine inspection and maintenance; records-related activities; and stakeholder support. For more information about the Rio Blanco site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and Links

  19. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Rulison

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Rulison, Colorado, Site A Nevada Offsite rulison_map The DOE Office of Legacy Management assumed responsibility for long-term surveillance and maintenance at the Rulison site in 2008. The Rulison site requires monitoring of nearby natural gas wells, groundwater wells, and surface water locations; routine inspection and maintenance; records-related activities; and stakeholder support. For more information about the Rulison site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and Links Contact Us Rulison

  20. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Shirley

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Wyoming Shirley Basin South, Wyoming, Disposal Site UMTRCA Title II site shirley_map The Shirley Basin South disposal site was a uranium-ore-processing site addressed by Title II of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA). The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and is administered under the provisions of a general NRC license. The site requires routine inspection and maintenance, groundwater monitoring, records-related activities, and stakeholder

  1. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Shoal

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Nevada Shoal, Nevada, Site A Nevada Offsite shoalmap The DOE Office of Legacy Management assumed responsibility for long-term surveillance and maintenance at the Shoal Site in 2008. The Shoal site requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Shoal site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and Links Contact Us Shoal Site Mapping and Monitoring (GEMS) Last Updated: 2/22/2016

  2. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Weldon

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Missouri Weldon Spring, Missouri, Site A CERCLA site weldon_map Remediation at the Weldon Spring Site was conducted in accordance with Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) regulations. The Weldon Spring Site was transferred to the Office of Legacy Management (LM) in 2003. LM conducts long-term surveillance and maintenance at the site which includes routine inspections, site maintenance, records-related activities, stakeholder support, and operation of an

  3. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Edge

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    South Dakota Edgemont, South Dakota, Disposal Site UMTRCA Title II site edgemont_map The Edgemont Disposal Site was a uranium processing site addressed by Title II of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA). The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and is administered under the provisions of a general NRC license. The site requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the

  4. Office of Legacy Management | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Office of Legacy Management Abandoned Uranium Mines Abandoned Uranium Mines Read more Amchitka, Alaska, Site Amchitka, Alaska, Site Read more Mexican Hat, Utah, Disposal Site Mexican Hat, Utah, Disposal Site Read more Tuba City, Arizona, Disposal Site Tuba City, Arizona, Disposal Site Read more Rifle, Colorado, Disposal Site Rifle, Colorado, Disposal Site Read more Announcements We invite you to review the draft LM 2016-2025 Strategic Plan which is now posted for public comment. We are updating

  5. 2014 Annual Planning Summary for the Office of Legacy Management |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Legacy Management 2014 Annual Planning Summary for the Office of Legacy Management The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2014 and 2015 within the Office of Legacy Management.. PDF icon LM-NEPA-APS-2014.pdf More Documents & Publications 2014 Annual Planning Summary for the Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management 2014 Annual Planning Summary for the NNSA Production Office 2014 Annual Planning Summary for the

  6. Colorado Environmental Coalition v. Office of Legacy Management, Civil

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Action No. 08-cv-01624 (February 27, 2012) | Department of Energy February 27, 2012) Colorado Environmental Coalition v. Office of Legacy Management, Civil Action No. 08-cv-01624 (February 27, 2012) U.S. District Court's Order of February 27, 2012, in Colorado Environmental Coalition v. Office of Legacy Management, Civil Action No. 08-cv-01624 (D. Colo.). PDF icon U.S. District Court's Order of February 27, 2012, in Colorado Environmental Coalition v. Office of Legacy Management, Civil

  7. Office of Legacy Management the First Decade 2003-2013

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    At the August 13, 2014 Committee meeting Tom Longo DOE, Provided an Overview of the Last Ten Years of Legacy Management Across the DOE Complex.

  8. Office of Legacy Management FY 2013 Consolidated Energy Data...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    3 Consolidated Energy Data Report (CEDR) Office of Legacy Management FY 2013 Consolidated Energy Data Report (CEDR) The Consolidated Energy Data Report (CEDR) consists of 27...

  9. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Niagara Falls Storage Site...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    of Engineers but will eventually transfer to the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management. Assessment of Historical Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory Waste Storage...

  10. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Bonus_Framework

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    and Decommissioning (D&D) Program and Nevada Offsites Project, the Office of Legacy Management ensures compliance with DOE Order 5400.1, "General Environmental Protection...

  11. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Riverton Mill Site - WY...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I Site April Gil, PhD Environment Team Lead Office of Legacy Management (LM) May 2, 20122 Status and Action Summary Surface Remediation ...

  12. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Shiprock Mill Site - NM...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ... Evaluation of the Trench 2 Groundwater Remediation System at the Shiprock, New Mexico, Legacy Management Site March 2009 Supplement to the Baseline Risk Assessment of Ground Water ...

  13. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management Legacy Uranium Mine Site Reclamation - Lessons Learned - 12384

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kilpatrick, Laura E.; Cotter, Ed

    2012-07-01

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management is responsible for administering the DOE Uranium Leasing Program (ULP) and its 31 uranium lease tracts located in the Uravan Mineral Belt of southwestern Colorado (see Figure 1). In addition to administering the ULP for the last six decades, DOE has also undertaken the significant task of reclaiming a large number of abandoned uranium (legacy) mine sites and associated features located throughout the Uravan Mineral Belt. In 1995, DOE initiated a 3-year reconnaissance program to locate and delineate (through extensive on-the-ground mapping) the legacy mine sites and associated features contained within the historically defined boundaries of its uranium lease tracts. During that same time frame, DOE recognized the lack of regulations pertaining to the reclamation of legacy mine sites and contacted the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) concerning the reclamation of legacy mine sites. In November 1995, The BLM Colorado State Office formally issued the United States Department of the Interior, Colorado Bureau of Land Management, Closure/Reclamation Guidelines, Abandoned Uranium Mine Sites as a supplement to its Solid Minerals Reclamation Handbook (H-3042-1). Over the next five-and-one-half years, DOE reclaimed the 161 legacy mine sites that had been identified on DOE withdrawn lands. By the late 1990's, the various BLM field offices in southwestern Colorado began to recognize DOE's experience and expertise in reclaiming legacy mine sites. During the ensuing 8 years, BLM funded DOE (through a series of task orders) to perform reclamation activities at 182 BLM mine sites. To date, DOE has reclaimed 372 separate and distinct legacy mine sites. During this process, DOE has learned many lessons and is willing to share those lessons with others in the reclamation industry because there are still many legacy mine sites not yet reclaimed. DOE currently administers 31 lease tracts (11,017 ha) that collectively contain over 220 legacy (abandoned) uranium mine sites. This contrasts to the millions of hectares administered by the BLM, the U.S. Forest Service, and other federal, tribal, and state agencies that contain thousands of such sites. DOE believes that the processes it has used provide a practical and cost-effective approach to abandoned uranium mine-site reclamation. Although the Federal Acquisition Regulations preclude DOE from competing with private industry, DOE is available to assist other governmental and tribal agencies in their reclamation efforts. (authors)

  14. Energy Department Awards Small Business Contract for Legacy Management Work

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    to S.M. Stoller Corporation | Department of Energy Small Business Contract for Legacy Management Work to S.M. Stoller Corporation Energy Department Awards Small Business Contract for Legacy Management Work to S.M. Stoller Corporation July 2, 2007 - 2:54pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced the award of a prime contract for the Department's Office of Legacy Management (LM) Support Services work to S.M. Stoller Corporation for surveillance and

  15. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- GrnRiv

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Utah Green River, Utah, Disposal Site UMTRCA Title I site grn_map The Green River disposal site, a Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I disposal site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Green River site, view the fact sheet.

  16. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Lake_D

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Disposal Site UMTRCA Title I site laked_map The Lakeview Disposal Site, an Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I disposal site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Lakeview site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and Links

  17. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Lake_P

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Processing Site UMTRCA Title I site lakep_map The Lakeview processing site, a Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Lakeview site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and Links Contact

  18. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Maybell_West(2)

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Maybell West, Colorado, Disposal Site UMTRCA Title II site Maybell West The Maybell West disposal site, a Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title II disposal site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2010 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Maybell West site, view the

  19. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- MexHat

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Utah Mexican Hat, Utah, Disposal Site UMTRCA Title I site mex_map The Mexican Hat disposal site, a Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I disposal site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Mexican Hat site, view the fact sheet.

  20. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- MonValley

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Arizona Monument Valley, Arizona, Processing Site UMTRCA Title I site monval_map The Monument Valley Processing Site, an Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I site, is managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Monument Valley site, view the fact sheet. Site History Site

  1. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- SiteA

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Illinois Site A/Plot M, Illinois, Decommissioned Reactor Site A D&D Program Site sitea_map As part of the DOE Defense Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D) Program, the Office of Legacy Management manages the Site A/Plot M Decommissioned Reactor Site and ensures compliance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental protection laws and regulations, executive orders, and internal DOE policies. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires

  2. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Dur_D

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Disposal Site UMTRCA Title I site durd_map The Durango Disposal site, a Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I disposal site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Durango site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and Links

  3. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Dur_P

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Processing Site UMTRCA Title I site durp_map The Durango processing site, a Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Durango site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and Links Contact Us

  4. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Gun_D

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Disposal Site UMTRCA Title I site gund_map The Gunnison Disposal Site, an Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I disposal site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Gunnison site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and Links

  5. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Gun_P

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Processing Site UMTRCA Title I site gunp_map The Gunnison Processing Site, an Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Gunnison site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and Links Contact

  6. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Nat_D

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Disposal Site UMTRCA Title I site natd_map The Naturita Disposal Site, an Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I disposal site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Naturita site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and Links

  7. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Nat_P

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Processing Site UMTRCA Title I site natp_map The Naturita processing site, a Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Naturita site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and Links Contact

  8. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Rifle_D

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Rifle, Colorado, Disposal Site UMTRCA Title I site rifled_map The Rifle Disposal Site, an Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I disposal site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Rifle site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents

  9. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Rifle_Old

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Old Rifle, Colorado, Processing Site UMTRCA Title I site rifleold_map The Old Rifle processing site, a Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Old Rifle site, view the fact sheet. Site

  10. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- SLC_D

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Disposal Site UMTRCA Title I site slcd_map The Salt Lake City disposal site, a Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I disposal site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Salt Lake City site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents

  11. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- SLC_P

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Processing Site UMTRCA Title I site slcp_map The Salt Lake City processing site, a Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Salt Lake City site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and

  12. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Slick_D

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Disposal Site UMTRCA Title I site slickd_map The Slick Rock Disposal Site, an Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I disposal site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Slick Rock site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and

  13. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Slick_P

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Processing Site UMTRCA Title I site Slick Rock P updated The Slick Rock processing site, a Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Slick Rock site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and

  14. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Maywood Site - NJ 10

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    of Engineers but will eventually transfer to the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management. Aerial Photograph of the Maywood, New Jersey, Site NJ.10-1 - DOE Letter;...

  15. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Abandoned Uranium Mines

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Uranium Mines Report to Congress The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management completed a report on defense-related uranium mines in consultation with...

  16. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- El_Verde

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Rico El Verde, Puerto Rico, Site Other Regulatory Framework elverde The DOE Office of Legacy Management assumed responsibility for a tree in Study Area 4 of El Verde site in 2005....

  17. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Colonie - NY 06

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    of Engineers but will eventually transfer to the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management. NY.06-1 - DOE Report (DOEOR20722-53); Colonie Interim Storage Site...

  18. Environmental and Waste Management (WMO) Legacy TRU Waste Pause |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy Environmental and Waste Management (WMO) Legacy TRU Waste Pause Environmental and Waste Management (WMO) Legacy TRU Waste Pause This document was used to determine facts and conditions during the Department of Energy Accident Investigation Board's investigation into the radiological release event at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Additional documents referenced and listed in the Phase 2 Radiological Release Event at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant on February 14, 2014,

  19. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Rifle_New

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    New Rifle, Colorado, Processing Site UMTRCA Title I site Rifle_New_Map_11/30/2011 The New Rifle processing site, a Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I site, is licensed to DOE for long-term custody and managed by the Office of Legacy Management. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the New Rifle site, view the fact

  20. Colorado Environmental Coalition v. Office of Legacy Management, Civil

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Action No. 08-cv-01624 (October 18, 2011) | Department of Energy October 18, 2011) Colorado Environmental Coalition v. Office of Legacy Management, Civil Action No. 08-cv-01624 (October 18, 2011) U.S. District Court's Order of October 18, 2011, in Colorado Environmental Coalition v. Office of Legacy Management, Civil Action No. 08-cv-01624 (D. Colo.). The Court has issued the injunctive relief described on pages 51-52 of the Order. PDF icon U.S. District Court's Order of October 18, 2011, in

  1. 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Office of Legacy Management (LM), Grand

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Junction (See LM APS) | Department of Energy Legacy Management (LM), Grand Junction (See LM APS) 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Office of Legacy Management (LM), Grand Junction (See LM APS) The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2011 and 2012 within the Office of Legacy Management (LM), Grand Junction (See LM APS). PDF icon 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Office of Legacy Management (LM), Grand Junction (See LM APS) More Documents &

  2. Legacy Management Work Progresses on Defense-Related Uranium Mines Report to Congress

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management (LM) continues to work on a report to Congress regarding defense-related legacy uranium mines. LM was directed by the U.S. Congress in the...

  3. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Gen_Atomics

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    General Atomics Hot Cell Facility, California, Site A Oakland Operations Office site gen_atomics_map The General Atomics Hot Cell Facility site was a research laboratory formerly operated under the DOE Oakland Operations Office, California. After remediation, the site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2005. The site requires records management and stakeholder support. For more information about the General Atomics Hot Cell

  4. PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT: OFFICE OF LEGACY MANAGEMENT: RECORDS

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    '" " * .1 * PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT: OFFICE OF LEGACY MANAGEMENT: RECORDS HANDLING SYSTEM: FREEDOM OF INFORMAnON ACT/ PRIVACY ACT PIA Template Version - May, 2009 Department of Energy Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Guidance is provided in the template. See DOE Order 206.1, Department of Energy Privacy Program, Appendix A, Privacy Impact Assessments, for requirements and additional guidance for conducting a PIA: http://www.directives.doe.gov/pdfs/doe/doetextlneword/206/02061.pdf

  5. PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT: OFFICE OF LEGACY MANAGEMENT: RECORDS

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ,. - -i * PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT: OFFICE OF LEGACY MANAGEMENT: RECORDS HANDLING SYSTEM: FERNALD HISTORICAL RECORDS SYSTEM PIA Template Version - May, 2009 Department of Energy Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Guidance is provided in the template. See DOE Order 206.1, Department of Energy Privacy Program, Appendix A, Privacy Impact Assessments, for requirements and additional guidance for conducting a PIA: http://www.directives.doe.gov/pdfs/doe/doetextlneword/206/02061.pdf Please complete

  6. PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT: OFFICE OF LEGACY MANAGEMENT: RECORDS

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    * PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT: OFFICE OF LEGACY MANAGEMENT: RECORDS HANDLING SYSTEM ROCKY FLATS ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS DATABASE PIA Template Version - May, 2009 Department of Energy Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Guidance is provided in the template. See DOE Order 206.1, Department of Energy Privacy Program, Appendix A, Privacy Impact Assessments, for requirements and additional guidance for conducting a PIA: http://www.directives.doe.gov/pdfs/doe/doetextlneword/206/o2061.pdf Please complete

  7. PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT: OFFICE OF LEGACY MANAGEMENT: RECORDS

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    -. ., ,-- -.' * PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT: OFFICE OF LEGACY MANAGEMENT: RECORDS HANDLING SYSTEM: ELECTRONIC RECORDS KEEPING SYSTEM PIA Template Version - May, 2009 Department of Energy Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Guidance is provided in the template. See DOE Order 206.1. Department of Energy Privacy Program, Appendix A. Privacy Impact Assessments. for requirements and additional guidance for conducting a PIA: http://www.directives.doe.gov/pdfs/doe/doetext/neword/206/02061.pdf Please complete

  8. PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT: OFFICE OF LEGACY MANAGEMENT: RECORDS

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    OFFICE OF LEGACY MANAGEMENT: RECORDS HANDLING SYSTEM: ENERGY EMPLOYEES OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS COMPENSATION PROGRAM ACT PIA Template Version - May, 2009 Department of Energy Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Guidance Is provided in the template. See DOE Order 206.1, Department of Energy Privacy Program, Appendix A, Privacy Impact Assessments, for requirements and additional guidance for conducting a PIA: http://www.directives.doe.gov/pdfs/doe/doetextlneword/206/02061.pdf Please complete

  9. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management LMS 3047FER Page 1 of 2 02/02/2010 Fernald Preserve Institutional Control Inspection Date Dec. 2011 Inspector SM Stoller Area Institutional Controls Type of Finding (See Definitions Page) Follow Up Institutional Control Signage Barrier Groundskeeping Other Description Photo? (File No.) Corrected Maintenance Req'd Cont. Observation Access Points South Access NO FINDINGS No North Access NO FINDINGS No Eco Park NO FINDINGS No Forest Demo NO

  10. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Rocky Flats Regulatory Documents

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Regulatory Documents Rocky Flats Site, Colorado Regulatory Documents All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Notification that GS01 is no longer an RFLMA Point of Compliance (POC) Third Five-Year Review Report for the Rocky Flats Site Rocky Flats Legacy Management Agreement Environmental Covenant, November 14, 2011 Corrective Action Decision/Record of Decision Amendment for Rocky Flats Plant (USDOE) Central Operable Unit Proposed Plan for the Rocky Flats CAD/ROD Amendment (June 2011)

  11. Office of Legacy Management (LM) Program Update, October¬タモDecember 2010

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    0 - Visit us at www.lm.doe.gov Welcome to the October-December 2010 issue of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) . This publication is designed to provide a status of activities within LM. Please direct all comments and inquiries to . Program Update lm@hq.doe.gov Program Update Legacy Management See page for a map of LM sites. 14 See page 15 for a more detailed version of LM's goals. Legacy Management Goals Goal 5 Office of Legacy Management Receives Management

  12. Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Legacy Management Support Team- January 2012

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Evaluation to determine whether Legacy Management Support Team is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

  13. Office of Legacy Management Designated as a High-Performing Organization |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management Designated as a High-Performing Organization Office of Legacy Management Designated as a High-Performing Organization July 6, 2009 - 11:45am Addthis What does this project do? Goal 5. Sustain management excellence Executive Summary: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) was established in 2003 to serve as the steward for the nation's Cold War nuclear legacy. LM is responsible for the long-term surveillance and

  14. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Pinellas

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Florida Pinellas County, Florida, Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Plan for the Pinellas Site Sitewide Environmental Monitoring Semiannual Progress Report for the Young - Rainey STAR Center June Through November 2015 Semiannual Progress Report for the 4.5 Acre Site June Through November 2015 Draft Building 100 Area Plume Management Alternatives Analysis (March 2012) Building 100 Area Site

  15. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management 03/11/2014 03/11/2014 Beginning: Ending: Fernald Preserve OSDF Walkdown Inspection Report Inspector(s): Stoller, Ohio EPA, ODH Area(s): Enitre cell, toe, drainages and fence line Map No. Location GPS? Type of Finding Description Photo? (File No.) No woody vegetation AT1 West 6:1, cell 1 Vegetation No Longer than 3' AT2 West 6:1, cell 2 Erosion No Thistle AT3 West 6:1, cell 3 Vegetation No longer than 3' AT4 West 6:1 north of VH, cell 5

  16. Legacy Management CERCLA Sites. Quality Assurance Project Plan

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Riddle, Donna L.

    2007-05-03

    S.M. Stoller Corporation is the contractor for the Technical Assistance Contract (TAC) for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) operations. Stoller employs a management system that applies to all programs, projects, and business management systems funded through DOE-LM task orders. The management system incorporates the philosophy, policies, and requirements of health and safety, environmental compliance, and quality assurance (QA) in all aspects of project planning and implementation. Health and safety requirements are documented in the Health and Safety Manual (STO 2), the Radiological Control Manual (STO 3), the Integrated Safety Management System Description (STO 10), and the Drilling Health and Safety Requirements (STO 14). Environmental compliance policy and requirements are documented in the Environmental Management Program Implementation Manual (STO 11). The QA Program is documented in the Quality Assurance Manual (STO 1). The QA Manual (STO 1) implements the specific requirements and philosophy of DOE Order 414.1C, Quality Assurance. This manual also includes the requirements of other standards that are regularly imposed by customers, regulators, or other DOE orders. Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations Part 830, Quality Assurance Requirements, ANSI/ASQC E4-2004, Quality Systems for Environmental Data and Technology Programs Requirements with Guidance for Use, and ISO 14001-2004, Environmental Management Systems, have been included. These standards are similar in content. The intent of the QA Manual (STO 1) is to provide a QA management system that incorporates the requirements and philosophy of DOE and other customers within the QA Manual. Criterion 1, Quality Assurance Program, identifies the fundamental requirements for establishing and implementing the QA management system; QA Instruction (QAI) 1.1, QA Program Implementation, identifies the TAC organizations that have responsibility for implementing the QA program requirements; and Appendix C of the QA Manual provides comparison tables that identify where the requirements of other standards are addressed in the QA Manual.

  17. Office of Legacy Management (LM) Program Update, July¬タモSeptember 2009

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    - S e p t e m b e r 2 0 0 9 Visit us at www.LM.doe.gov Welcome to the 2009 issue of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) . This publication is designed to provide a status of activities within LM. Please direct all comments and inquiries to . Program Update July-September LM@hq.doe.gov Program Update ENERGY Legacy Management U.S. DEPARTMENT OF See page 1 for a map of LM sites. 2 See page 13 for a more detailed version of LM's goals. Legacy Management Goals The

  18. Office of Legacy Management (LM) Program Update, April¬タモJune 2009

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    0 9 - Visit us at www.LM.doe.gov Welcome to the 2009 issue of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) . This publication is designed to provide a status of activities within LM. Please direct all comments and inquiries to . Program Update April-June LM@hq.doe.gov Program Update ENERGY Legacy Management U.S. DEPARTMENT OF Goal 1 Draft Path Forward Report for the Rulison Nuclear Explosion Site Available for Review The Office of Legacy Management (LM) released the draft

  19. Office of Legacy Management (LM) Program Update, April¬タモJune 2010

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    0 - Visit us at www.LM.doe.gov Welcome to the April-June 2010 issue of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) . This publication is designed to provide a status of activities within LM. Please direct all comments and inquiries to . Program Update LM@hq.doe.gov Program Update ENERGY Legacy Management U.S. DEPARTMENT OF See page for a map of LM sites. 10 See page 11 for a more detailed version of LM's goals. Legacy Management Goals Goal 5 Native American Cultural

  20. Office of Legacy Management (LM) Program Update, April¬タモJune 2011

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    p r i l - J u n e 2 0 1 1 Visit us at www.lm.doe.gov Welcome to the April-June 2011 issue of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) Program Update. This publication is designed to provide a status of activities within LM. Please direct all comments and inquiries to . lm@hq.doe.gov Program Update Legacy Management On May 31, 2011, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) completed a comprehensive 18-month effort to evaluate the

  1. Office of Legacy Management (LM) Program Update, April¬タモJune 2012

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    2 - Visit us at www.lm.doe.gov Welcome to the April-June 2012 issue of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) . This publication is designed to provide a status of activities within LM. Please direct all comments and inquiries to . Program Update lm@hq.doe.gov Program Update Legacy Management U.S. Representative Scott Tipton of Colorado's 3rd Congressional District visited the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management (LM) Grand Junction, site in

  2. Office of Legacy Management (LM) Program Update, January¬タモMarch 2010

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    0 - Visit us at www.LM.doe.gov Welcome to the January-March 2010 issue of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) . This publication is designed to provide a status of activities within LM. Please direct all comments and inquiries to LM@hq.doe.gov. Program Update Program Update ENERGY Legacy Management U.S. DEPARTMENT OF See page for a map of LM sites. 10 See page 11 for a more detailed version of LM's goals. Legacy Management Goals Goal 1 LM Installs a Solar

  3. Office of Legacy Management (LM) Program Update, January¬タモMarch 2012

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    2 - Visit us at www.lm.doe.gov Welcome to the January-March 2012 issue of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) . This publication is designed to provide a status of activities within LM. Please direct all comments and inquiries to . Program Update lm@hq.doe.gov Program Update Legacy Management In February 2011, the Office of Legacy Management (LM) began work as part of an interagency effort to develop a design for the disposal of material from the Northeast Church

  4. Office of Legacy Management (LM) Program Update, July¬タモSeptember 2011

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    1 - Visit us at www.lm.doe.gov Welcome to the July-September 2011 issue of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) . This publication is designed to provide a status of activities within LM. Please direct all comments and inquiries to . Program Update lm@hq.doe.gov Program Update Legacy Management On July 27, 2011, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) completed the long-term monitoring of Amchitka Island, an event that occurs once

  5. Office of Legacy Management (LM) Program Update, October¬タモDecember 2009

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    0 9 - Visit us at www.LM.doe.gov Welcome to the 2009 issue of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) . This publication is designed to provide a status of activities within LM. Please direct all comments and inquiries to . Program Update October-December LM@hq.doe.gov Program Update ENERGY Legacy Management U.S. DEPARTMENT OF See page for a map of LM sites. 14 See page 15 for a more detailed version of LM's goals. Legacy Management Goals The first goal of the U.S.

  6. Legacy Management Work Progresses on Defense-Related Uranium...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    defense-related legacy uranium mine sites located within 11 uranium mining districts in 6 western states. At these sites, photographs and global positioning location data were...

  7. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Fernald Environmental Management

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Project - 027 Fernald Environmental Management Project - 027 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Fernald Environmental Management Project (027) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: The Fernald Environmental Management Project (FEMP), formerly known as the Feed Materials Production Center, is located about 18 miles northwest of

  8. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Legacy Management Program Update, April-June 2009

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    2009-04-01

    Welcome to the April-June 2009 issue of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) Program Update. This publication is designed to provide a status of activities within LM. The Legacy Management goals are: (1) Protect human health and the environment through effective and efficient long-term surveillance and maintenance - This goal highlights DOE's responsibility to ensure long-term protection of people, the environment, and the integrity of engineered remedies and monitoring systems. (2) Preserve, protect, and make accessible legacy records and information - This goal recognizes LM's commitment to successfully manage records, information, and archives of legacy sites under its authority. (3) Support an effective and efficient work force structured to accomplish Departmental missions and assure continuity of contractor worker pension and medical benefits - This goal recognizes DOE's commitment to its contracted work force and the consistent management of pension and health benefits. As sites continue to close, DOE faces the challenges of managing pension plan and health benefits liability. (4) Manage legacy land and assets, emphasizing protective real and personal property reuse and disposition - This goal recognizes a DOE need for local collaborative management of legacy assets, including coordinating land use planning, personal property disposition to community reuse organizations, and protecting heritage resources (natural, cultural, and historical). (5) Improve program effectiveness through sound management - This goal recognizes that LM's goals cannot be attained efficiently unless the federal and contractor work force is motivated to meet requirements and work toward continuous performance improvement.

  9. ORISE: ORAU-managed ORISE given 'Legacy of Stars' award from U.S.

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Department of Energy for outstanding safety and health performance ORAU-managed ORISE given 'Legacy of Stars' award from U.S. Department of Energy for outstanding safety and health performance Award marks third consecutive time ORISE has received the prestigious designation FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Sept. 11, 2014 FY14-68 Legacy of Stars award Legacy of Stars award (Click for high resolution version) WASHINGTON, D.C.-The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, which is managed by ORAU for

  10. Office of Legacy Management Tim Murphy, Chief Bureau of Federal Facilities

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Office of Legacy Management Tim Murphy, Chief Bureau of Federal Facilities Division of Environmental Protection 2030 E. Flamingo Road, Suite 230 Las Vegas, NV 89119-0818 NOV 2 4 2009 Subject: Final Path Forward: Shoti-Term Data Acquisition Plan for New Closure Strategy Subsmface Corrective Action Unit 447, Project Shoal Area, Nevada Dear Mr. Murphy: On July 20, 2009, the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Legacy Management (DOE-LM), issued the draft Path Forward for Subswface, Corrective

  11. Office of Legacy Management FY 2014 Consolidated Energy Data Report (CEDR)

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    | Department of Energy 4 Consolidated Energy Data Report (CEDR) Office of Legacy Management FY 2014 Consolidated Energy Data Report (CEDR) The Consolidated Energy Data Report (CEDR) consists of 27 worksheets that should be completed by each site, as applicable, and included as part each site's SSP in a MS Excel electronic format. The CEDR is due to the SPO annually. File Office of Legacy Management FY 2014 Consolidated Energy Data Report (CEDR) More Documents & Publications Office of

  12. Office of Legacy Management FY 2015 Consolidated Energy Data Report (CEDR)

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    | Department of Energy 5 Consolidated Energy Data Report (CEDR) Office of Legacy Management FY 2015 Consolidated Energy Data Report (CEDR) The Consolidated Energy Data Report (CEDR) consists of 27 worksheets that should be completed by each site, as applicable, and included as part each site's SSP in a MS Excel electronic format. The CEDR is due to the SPO annually. File Office of Legacy Management FY 2015 Consolidated Energy Data Report (CEDR) More Documents & Publications Office of

  13. Office of Legacy Management (LM) Program Update, January¬タモMarch 2011

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    1 - Visit us at www.lm.doe.gov Welcome to the January-March 2011 issue of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) . This publication is designed to provide a status of activities within LM. Please direct all comments and inquiries to . Program Update lm@hq.doe.gov Program Update Legacy Management Contracts were recently awarded to two charter vessels that will transport equipment and personnel to the island of Amchitka, Alaska, for the 2011 biological sampling and

  14. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Website Still Under Construction

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Website Still Under Construction LMBC_tractor Website Under Construction This website is still under construction. Please forgive any temporary interruptions you experience. All comments are welcome To reach the main site visit http://stage.lm.doe.gov/home.aspx This corresponds to Goal 2 of LM's Goals -- Preserve, protect, and make accessible legacy records and information. Click here to view all of LM's Goals and Performance Measures Last Updated: 5/5/2009

  15. Office of Legacy Management (LM) Program Update, October¬タモDecember 2011

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Fernald Preserve in Harrison, Ohio, hosted a workers reunion event in the Visitors Center on Saturday, October 15, 2011. More than 300 former workers from the Production Era (1950 to 1989) and the Cleanup Era (1989 to 2006) mingled with each other and the current staff representing the site's legacy management mission (2006 to present day) during the day-long event. A presentation was given that recognized the efforts of all these former and current site workers. Jane Powell, Fernald Preserve

  16. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Notice_LEHR_CERCLA_FiveYearReview

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    > Notice_LEHR_CERCLA_FiveYearReview Notice of LEHR CERCLA Five-Year Review The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) is conducting the first Five-Year Review of the remedies for the environmental cleanup of the DOE areas of the former Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research (LEHR) at the University of California, Davis, under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). DOE successfully completed removal actions at DOE

  17. Office of Legacy Management: The First Five Years FY 2004¬タモ2008

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    S . D E PA R T M E NT O F U. S . D E PA R T M E NT O F ENERGY ENERGY Managing Today's Change, Protecting Tomorrow's Future Managing Today's Change, Protecting Tomorrow's Future DOE/LM-1461 Office of Legacy Management FY 2004-2008 The First Five Years Front cover photos top to bottom: Rocky Flats, Colorado, site and the Fernald Preserve Visitors Center in Ohio. Back cover photos top to bottom: Pinellas, Florida, site and the Rifle, Colorado, site. This report covers the time period from December

  18. Project Management Practices

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Version) See Figure 3-3. 19. Administrative Controls 1. Provisions relating to organization and management, procedures, recordkeeping, assessment, and reporting necessary to...

  19. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- SLC_P

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Compliance Action Plan for the Salt Lake City, Utah UMTRA Project Site Long-Term Management Plan for the Salt Lake City, Utah, (UMTRCA Title I) Processing Site Notice of...

  20. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Nuclear Metals Inc - MA 09

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Metals Inc - MA 09 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: NUCLEAR METALS, INC. (MA.09) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP - Licensed facility - included in NRC action plan (Site Decommissioning Management Plan) in 1990 for cleanup Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 1555 Massachusetts Ave. , Cambridge , Massachusetts MA.09-2 Evaluation Year: 1987 MA.09-1 Site Operations: Produced natural uranium tubes for Savannah River reactor program and fabricated power reactor fuel

  1. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Stanford Linear Accelerator Center -

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    005 Stanford Linear Accelerator Center - 005 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (005) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: The Stanford Linear Accelerator Center was established in 1962 as a research facility for high energy particle physics. The Environmental Management mission at this site is to

  2. MANAGING HANFORD'S LEGACY NO-PATH-FORWARD WASTES TO DISPOSITION

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    WEST LD

    2011-01-13

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Richland Operations Office (RL) has adopted the 2015 Vision for Cleanup of the Hanford Site. This vision will protect the Columbia River, reduce the Site footprint, and reduce Site mortgage costs. The CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company's (CHPRC) Waste and Fuels Management Project (W&FMP) and their partners support this mission by providing centralized waste management services for the Hanford Site waste generating organizations. At the time of the CHPRC contract award (August 2008) slightly more than 9,000 m{sup 3} of waste was defined as 'no-path-forward waste.' The majority of these wastes are suspect transuranic mixed (TRUM) wastes which are currently stored in the low-level Burial Grounds (LLBG), or stored above ground in the Central Waste Complex (CWC). A portion of the waste will be generated during ongoing and future site cleanup activities. The DOE-RL and CHPRC have collaborated to identify and deliver safe, cost-effective disposition paths for 90% ({approx}8,000 m{sup 3}) of these problematic wastes. These paths include accelerated disposition through expanded use of offsite treatment capabilities. Disposal paths were selected that minimize the need to develop new technologies, minimize the need for new, on-site capabilities, and accelerate shipments of transuranic (TRU) waste to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in Carlsbad, New Mexico.

  3. ORAU-managed ORISE again recognized as DOE "Legacy of Stars" site for

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    outstanding safety and health performance ORAU-managed ORISE again recognized as DOE "Legacy of Stars" site for outstanding safety and health performance ORAU safety and health director honored for excellent program leadership FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Oct. 20, 2010 FY11-02 OAK RIDGE, Tenn.-The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, which is managed by Oak Ridge Associated Universities, was recently named a 2010 Legacy of Stars site. This is the second consecutive time ORISE

  4. GIDAP Best Management Practice | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    GIDAP Best Management Practice Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- OtherOther: GIDAP Best Management PracticeLegal Abstract Generator...

  5. Biodiesel_Fuel_Management_Best_Practices_Report.pdf | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    BiodieselFuelManagementBestPracticesReport.pdf BiodieselFuelManagementBestPracticesReport.pdf BiodieselFuelManagementBestPracticesReport.pdf PDF icon ...

  6. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management's Tribal Interactions - 12513

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Gil, April; Shafer, David; Elmer, John

    2012-07-01

    Effective government-to-government interactions with tribal nations and maintaining stakeholder relations with members of tribes are increasingly important to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM). As of October 2011, LM was responsible for long-term surveillance and maintenance of 87 sites and facilities in the continental U.S. and Puerto Rico, including some sites on tribal lands. The sites on tribal lands can affect natural resources that are managed or used by tribes, or the sites can potentially affect areas of cultural significance to tribal nations in Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. Tribes are separate sovereign governments recognized in the U.S. Constitution and are significant stakeholders for LM sites. The tribes are individual nations with diverse histories, cultures, customs, religions, and laws. LM has regular communication with the affected tribes to inform members of issues, to allow the tribe to participate in decision making, to provide technical reviews, and to ensure tribal concerns are addressed. Four LM sites are in the Navajo Nation. Three of those sites contain uranium mill tailings disposal cells regulated under long-term surveillance and maintenance programs that require monitoring and annual inspections. The fourth site was remediated but still has a groundwater plume that LM is responsible for. DOE and LM have worked with the Navajo Nation for almost 30 years on technical issues and to ensure tribal concerns are addressed. (authors)

  7. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Legacy Management Post Competition Accountability Report: High Performing Organization Proposal May 2012

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    4 Annual Report Management Excellence Goals Driving Top Priorities Target FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 1. Achieve EMS/Sustainability Goals (normalized to the number of legacy sites). Be a leader among DOE offices in sustainability.* Annual    2. Publish Post Competition Accountability Report on the LM internet. Quarterly    3. Conduct independent evaluations of key programs, projects, or technical issues by goal using external auditors. Annual    4. Augment LM

  8. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Legacy Management Post Competition Accountability Report: High Performing Organization Proposal May 2012

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    3 Annual Report Management Excellence Goals Driving Top Priorities Target FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 1. Achieve EMS/Sustainability Goals (normalized to the number of legacy sites). Be a leader among DOE offices in sustainability.* Annual   2. Publish Post Competition Accountability Report on the LM internet. Quarterly   3. Conduct independent evaluations of key programs, projects, or technical issues by goal using external auditors. Annual   4. Augment LM Federal staff

  9. Best Management Practice #1: Water Management Planning

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    A successful water management program starts with developing a comprehensive water management plan. This plan should be included within existing facility operating plans.

  10. Integrated Weed Control for Land Stewardship at Legacy Management's Rocky Flats Site in Colorado - 13086

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Nelson, Jody K.

    2013-07-01

    Land stewardship is one of nine sustainability programs in the U.S. Department of Energy's Environmental Management System. Land stewardship includes maintaining and improving ecosystem health. At the Rocky Flats Site near Westminster, Colorado, land stewardship is an integral component of the Office of Legacy Management's post-closure monitoring and management at the site. Nearly 263 hectares (650 acres) were disturbed and re-vegetated during site cleanup and closure operations. Proactive management of revegetation areas is critical to the successful reestablishment of native grasslands, wetlands, and riparian communities. The undisturbed native plant communities that occur at the site also require active management to maintain the high-quality wetlands and other habitats that are home to numerous species of birds and other wildlife such as elk and deer, rare plant communities, and the federally listed threatened Preble's meadow jumping mouse. Over the past several decades, an increase of Noxious weeds has impacted much of Colorado's Front Range. As a result, weed control is a key component of the land stewardship program at Rocky Flats. Thirty-three species of state-listed Noxious weeds are known to occur in the Central and Peripheral Operable Units at Rocky Flats, along with another five species that are considered invasive at the site. Early detection and rapid response to control new invasive species is crucial to the program. An integrated weed control/vegetation management approach is key to maintaining healthy, sustainable plant communities that are able to resist Noxious weed invasions. Weed mapping, field surveys, and field-staff training sessions (to learn how to identify new potential problem species) are conducted to help detect and prevent new weed problems. The integrated approach at Rocky Flats includes administrative and cultural techniques (prevention), mechanical controls, biological controls, and chemical controls. Several species of biocontrol insects have been released to assist with control of different target weed species. Monitoring is conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of control efforts and to provide information for future control efforts. The effective implementation of this integrated approach has reduced the infestation levels of many species and has kept several newly discovered invasive species from spreading and becoming larger problems at the site. (authors)

  11. ODEQ - Construction Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Best Management Practices Manual Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library PermittingRegulatory Guidance - GuideHandbook: ODEQ - Construction Stormwater...

  12. Office of Legacy Management Decision Tree for Solar Photovoltaic Projects - 13317

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Elmer, John; Butherus, Michael; Barr, Deborah L.

    2013-07-01

    To support consideration of renewable energy power development as a land reuse option, the DOE Office of Legacy Management (LM) and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) established a partnership to conduct an assessment of wind and solar renewable energy resources on LM lands. From a solar capacity perspective, the larger sites in the western United States present opportunities for constructing solar photovoltaic (PV) projects. A detailed analysis and preliminary plan was developed for three large sites in New Mexico, assessing the costs, the conceptual layout of a PV system, and the electric utility interconnection process. As a result of the study, a 1,214-hectare (3,000-acre) site near Grants, New Mexico, was chosen for further study. The state incentives, utility connection process, and transmission line capacity were key factors in assessing the feasibility of the project. LM's Durango, Colorado, Disposal Site was also chosen for consideration because the uranium mill tailings disposal cell is on a hillside facing south, transmission lines cross the property, and the community was very supportive of the project. LM worked with the regulators to demonstrate that the disposal cell's long-term performance would not be impacted by the installation of a PV solar system. A number of LM-unique issues were resolved in making the site available for a private party to lease a portion of the site for a solar PV project. A lease was awarded in September 2012. Using a solar decision tree that was developed and launched by the EPA and NREL, LM has modified and expanded the decision tree structure to address the unique aspects and challenges faced by LM on its multiple sites. The LM solar decision tree covers factors such as land ownership, usable acreage, financial viability of the project, stakeholder involvement, and transmission line capacity. As additional sites are transferred to LM in the future, the decision tree will assist in determining whether a solar PV project is feasible on the new sites. (authors)

  13. Guidance on Basic Best Practices in Management of Energy Performance...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    on Basic Best Practices in Management of Energy Performance Buildings Guidance on Basic Best Practices in Management of Energy Performance Buildings Building energy management best...

  14. Sampling and Analysis Plan for U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management Sites

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    2012-10-24

    This plan incorporates U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) standard operating procedures (SOPs) into environmental monitoring activities and will be implemented at all sites managed by LM. This document provides detailed procedures for the field sampling teams so that samples are collected in a consistent and technically defensible manner. Site-specific plans (e.g., long-term surveillance and maintenance plans, environmental monitoring plans) document background information and establish the basis for sampling and monitoring activities. Information will be included in site-specific tabbed sections to this plan, which identify sample locations, sample frequencies, types of samples, field measurements, and associated analytes for each site. Additionally, within each tabbed section, program directives will be included, when developed, to establish additional site-specific requirements to modify or clarify requirements in this plan as they apply to the corresponding site. A flowchart detailing project tasks required to accomplish routine sampling is displayed in Figure 1. LM environmental procedures are contained in the Environmental Procedures Catalog (LMS/PRO/S04325), which incorporates American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), DOE, and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidance. Specific procedures used for groundwater and surface water monitoring are included in Appendix A. If other environmental media are monitored, SOPs used for air, soil/sediment, and biota monitoring can be found in the site-specific tabbed sections in Appendix D or in site-specific documents. The procedures in the Environmental Procedures Catalog are intended as general guidance and require additional detail from planning documents in order to be complete; the following sections fulfill that function and specify additional procedural requirements to form SOPs. Routine revision of this Sampling and Analysis Plan will be conducted annually at the beginning of each fiscal year when attachments in Appendix D, including program directives and sampling location/analytical tables, will be reviewed by project personnel and updated. The sampling location/analytical tables in Appendix D, however, may have interim updates according to project direction that are not reflected in this plan. Deviations from location/analytical tables in Appendix D prior to sampling will be documented in project correspondence (e.g., startup letters). If significant changes to other aspects of this plan are required before the annual update, then the plan will be revised as needed.

  15. Best Practices in Industrial Data Management

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Best Practices in Industrial Data Management Moderator: Paul Scheihing, AMO This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information. Industrial Data Management What is energy data management?  Monitoring  Recording  Analyzing  Reporting  Verification Strategic Importance of Robust Data Management  Provides data with a purpose  Without purpose, you can lose focus and drown in all of the data  Results in high quality data 

  16. Best Management Practice #1: Water Management Planning | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy 1: Water Management Planning Best Management Practice #1: Water Management Planning A successful water management program starts with a comprehensive strategic plan. The process for developing a strategic plan is generally the same for an individual facility or an agency. The plan provides information about current water uses and charts a course for water efficiency improvements, conservation activities, and water-reduction goals. A strategic plan establishes the priorities and helps

  17. New Course Teaches Best Practices for Water Management for Federal...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Course Teaches Best Practices for Water Management for Federal Facilities New Course Teaches Best Practices for Water Management for Federal Facilities May 8, 2014 - 11:13am ...

  18. Produced water volumes and management practices in the United...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Produced water volumes and management practices in the United States. Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Produced water volumes and management practices in the United ...

  19. Best Management Practice #10: Cooling Tower Management | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy 0: Cooling Tower Management Best Management Practice #10: Cooling Tower Management Cooling towers dissipate heat from recirculating water used to cool chillers, air conditioners, or other process equipment to the ambient air. Heat is rejected to the environment from cooling towers through the process of evaporation. Therefore, by design, cooling towers use significant amounts of water. Overview The thermal efficiency and longevity of the cooling tower and equipment depend on the

  20. Legacy Claims, PIA, Bechtel Jacobs Company, LLC | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Legacy Claims, PIA, Bechtel Jacobs Company, LLC Legacy Claims, PIA, Bechtel Jacobs Company, LLC Legacy Claims, PIA, Bechtel Jacobs Company, LLC PDF icon Legacy Claims, PIA, Bechtel Jacobs Company, LLC More Documents & Publications Medgate, PIA, Bechtel Jacobs Company, LLC Electronic Document Management System PIA, BechtelJacobs Company, LLC Oracle Financials PIA, Bechtel Jacobs Company, LLC

  1. Best Management Practices for Water Efficiency

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    FEMP originally developed Federal Water Efficiency Best Management Practices in response to Executive Order (E.O.) 13123 requirements, which required Federal agencies to reduce water use through cost-effective water efficiency improvements. E.O. 13423 supersedes E.O. 13123.

  2. Best Practices for Managing Organizational Diversity

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kreitz, Patricia A.; /SLAC

    2007-05-18

    In the twentieth century, ecologists and agriculturists developed an increasingly sophisticated understanding of the value of biological diversity, specifically the resilience and adaptability it brings to ecosystems. In the twenty-first century, the ecosystem model has been applied to human systems, particularly to understanding how organizations are structured and how they operate. Twenty-first century organizations are challenged by diversity in many arenas. Demographic changes in workforce composition and customer populations, combined with globalized markets and international competition are increasing the amount of diversity organizations must manage, both internally and externally. Many diversity specialists and business leaders argue that businesses and organizations interested in surviving and thriving in the twenty-first century need to take competitive advantage of a diverse workplace (Soutar, 2004; Yang, 2005). But to do so successfully, leaders and human resources (HR) managers must redefine management and leadership (Jones, 1989). Just as mono-cropping destroys biological diversity, and, in extreme cases, such as the Irish potato famine--human as well as natural ecosystems (Keohane, n.d.), so does mono-managing similarly destroy diversity within organizations. Leaders wanting to build strong, diverse organizations will not be successful if they rely on one approach or solution. Single-threaded diversity solutions, such as focusing only on recruitment or single-approach management techniques, such as requiring every employee to take diversity training, do not create lasting change (Kossek & Lobel, 1996; McMahon, 2006; Thomas, 1990). Bringing about the changes needed to build and sustain diversity requires commitment, strategy, communication, and concrete changes in organizational structure and processes. How, then, can managers and leaders develop diverse organizations and ensure that they are managed to take optimum advantage of diversity? What role should human resource specialists play in creating and managing diverse organizations? What are the best practices they should apply? The purpose of this review is to define workplace diversity, to identify best practices, and to identify how diversity management best practices can be applied in academic libraries. Finally, this review will provide a resource list for HR managers and leaders to learn more about those best practices with the goal of optimizing their organization's approach to diversity.

  3. Management of Legacy Spent Nuclear Fuel Wastes at the Chalk River Laboratories: The Challenges and Innovative Solutions Implemented - 13301

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Schruder, Kristan; Goodwin, Derek

    2013-07-01

    AECL's Fuel Packaging and Storage (FPS) Project was initiated in 2004 to retrieve, transfer, and stabilize an identified inventory of degraded research reactor fuel that had been emplaced within in-ground 'Tile Hole' structures in Chalk River Laboratories' Waste Management Area in the 1950's and 60's. Ongoing monitoring of the legacy fuel storage conditions had identified that moisture present in the storage structures had contributed to corrosion of both the fuel and the storage containers. This prompted the initiation of the FPS Project which has as its objective to design, construct, and commission equipment and systems that would allow for the ongoing safe storage of this fuel until a final long-term management, or disposition, pathway was available. The FPS Project provides systems and technologies to retrieve and transfer the fuel from the Waste Management Area to a new facility that will repackage, dry, safely store and monitor the fuel for a period of 50 years. All equipment and the new storage facility are designed and constructed to meet the requirements for Class 1 Nuclear Facilities in Canada. (authors)

  4. Practical Ocean Energy Management Systems Inc POEMS | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Ocean Energy Management Systems Inc POEMS Jump to: navigation, search Name: Practical Ocean Energy Management Systems Inc (POEMS) Place: San Diego, California Zip: 92138 Sector:...

  5. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Legacy Management Post Competitio...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    LM's carbon footprint by switching desktop computers to laptops with docking stations. ... Goal 4 FY2015 6. Complete analysis of LM management of ongoing mission ...

  6. INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER AT THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF LEGACY MANAGEMENT RIVERTON PROCESSING SITE

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Looney, B.; Denham, M.; Eddy-Dilek, C.

    2014-05-06

    The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management (DOE-LM) manages the legacy contamination at the Riverton, WY, Processing Site a former uranium milling site that operated from 1958 to 1963. The tailings and associated materials were removed in 1988-1989 and contaminants are currently flushing from the groundwater. DOE-LM commissioned an independent technical team to assess the status of the contaminant flushing, identify any issues or opportunities for DOE-LM, and provide key recommendations. The team applied a range of technical frameworks spatial, temporal, hydrological and geochemical in performing the evaluation. In each topic area, an in depth evaluation was performed using DOE-LM site data (e.g., chemical measurements in groundwater, surface water and soil, water levels, and historical records) along with information collected during the December 2013 site visit (e.g., plant type survey, geomorphology, and minerals that were observed, collected and evaluated). A few of the key findings include: ? Physical removal of the tailings and associated materials reduced contaminant discharges to groundwater and reduced contaminant concentrations in the near-field plume. ? In the mid-field and far-field areas, residual contaminants are present in the vadose zone as a result of a variety of factors (e.g., evaporation/evapotranspiration from the capillary fringe and water table, higher water levels during tailings disposal, and geochemical processes). ? Vadose zone contaminants are widely distributed above the plume and are expected to be present as solid phase minerals that can serve as secondary sources to the underlying groundwater. The mineral sample collected at the site is consistent with thermodynamic predictions. ? Water table fluctuations, irrigation, infiltration and flooding will episodically solubilize some of the vadose zone secondary source materials and release contaminants to the groundwater for continued down gradient migration extending the overall timeframe for flushing. ? Vertical contaminant stratification in the vadose zone and surficial aquifer will vary from location to location. Soil and water sampling strategies and monitoring well construction details will influence characterization and monitoring data. ? Water flows from the Wind River, beneath the Riverton Processing Site and through the plume toward the Little Wind River. This base flow pattern is influenced by seasonal irrigation and other anthropogenic activities, and by natural perturbations (e.g., flooding). ? Erosion and reworking of the sediments adjacent to the Little Wind River results in high heterogeneity and complex flow and geochemistry. Water flowing into oxbow lakes (or through areas where oxbow lakes were present in the past) will be exposed to localized geochemical conditions that favor chemical reduction (i.e., naturally reduced zones) and other attenuation processes. This attenuation is not sufficient to fully stabilize the plume or to reduce contaminant concentrations in the groundwater to target levels. Consistent with these observations, the team recommended increased emphasis on collecting data in the zones where secondary source minerals are projected to accumulate (e.g., just above the water table) using low cost methods such as x-ray fluorescence. The team also suggested several low cost nontraditional sources of data that have the potential to provide supplemental data (e.g., multispectral satellite imagery) to inform and improve legacy management decisions. There are a range of strategies for management of the legacy contamination in the groundwater and vadose zone near the Riverton Processing Site. These range from the current strategy, natural flushing, to intrusive remedies such as plume scale excavation of the vadose zone and pump & treat. Each option relates to the site specific conditions, issues and opportunities in a unique way. Further, each option has advantages and disadvantages that need to be weighed. Scoping evaluation was performed for three major classes of technologies contaminant removal technologies, contaminant stabilization technologies, and natural flushing. The intent of the scoping evaluation is to provide an initial set of options for consideration by LM as they finalize plans to address the Riverton groundwater plume. Three technologies were conditionally recommended: 1) continued natural flushing, 2) groundwater pump and treat with plume scale irrigation to help flush out vadose zone contamination, or 3) in situ stabilization using structured geochemical zones to supplement the naturally reduced zones already present at the site.

  7. Guidance on Basic Best Practices in Management of Energy Performance

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Buildings | Department of Energy on Basic Best Practices in Management of Energy Performance Buildings Guidance on Basic Best Practices in Management of Energy Performance Buildings Building energy management best practices PDF icon 11_001_eecbg_sep_building_best_practice.pdf More Documents & Publications Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Financing Program Guidance Grantee Letter SEP Guidance National Energy Policy Act Guide for State Energy Program and Energy Efficiency and

  8. Software Configuration Management (SCM) A Practical Guide | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy (SCM) A Practical Guide Software Configuration Management (SCM) A Practical Guide This document provides a practical guide for integrating software configuration management disciplines into the management of software engineering projects. Software configuration management is the process of identifying and defining the software configuration items in a system, controlling the release and change of these items throughout the system lifecycle, recording and reporting the status of

  9. New Course Teaches Best Practices for Water Management for Federal

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Facilities | Department of Energy Course Teaches Best Practices for Water Management for Federal Facilities New Course Teaches Best Practices for Water Management for Federal Facilities May 8, 2014 - 11:13am Addthis The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) now offers Best Practices for Comprehensive Water Management for Federal Facilities, a new e-Training core course that provides the knowledge and skills to increase efficiency and reduce water use through sound operations and

  10. Best Management Practice #7: Faucets and Showerheads | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    7: Faucets and Showerheads Best Management Practice #7: Faucets and Showerheads Best Management Practice #7: Faucets and Showerheads Most federal buildings have faucets in restrooms, kitchens, and laboratories. Many federal installations have showers, including barracks, family housing, recreation facilities, and locker rooms. Significant opportunity for water and energy savings exists for these fixtures when upgrading to efficient technology and employing conservation practices. Overview

  11. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Wah Chang - OR 0-03

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Wah Chang - OR 0-03 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: WAH CHANG (OR.0-03 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Albany , Oregon OR.0-03-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 OR.0-03-1 Site Operations: Contractor operator of Bureau of Mines plant the produced zirconium metal. Ore tailings from the process was covered under AEC license. Wah Chang also did thorium metal development work. OR.0-03-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Management

  12. Best Management Practice #4: Water-Efficient Landscaping | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Overview Outdoor water use efficiency has two facets: Designing a landscape that requires minimal supplemental water-the topic of this best management practice (BMP). Designing, ...

  13. Best Management Practice #5: Water-Efficient Irrigation | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Overview Outdoor water use efficiency has two facets. Designing a landscape that requires minimal supplemental water (see Best Management Practice (BMP) 4). Designing, installing, ...

  14. Best Management Practice #13: Other Water-Intensive Processes | Department

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    of Energy 13: Other Water-Intensive Processes Best Management Practice #13: Other Water-Intensive Processes Many water-intensive processes beyond the Federal Energy Management Program's best management practices (BMPs) for water efficiency are in place at federal facilities, including laundry equipment, vehicle wash systems, evaporative coolers, and water softening systems. When assessing facility water use, it is important to identify and analyze all water-intensive processes for potential

  15. Land management practices to become important as biofuels use grows |

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Argonne National Laboratory Land management practices to become important as biofuels use grows By Angela Hardin * May 21, 2015 Tweet EmailPrint The handling of agricultural crop residues appears to have a large impact on soil's ability to retain carbon, making land management practices increasingly important, especially under a scenario where cellulosic materials become more heavily used as a feedstock for ethanol production, according to a recently published study led by researchers at the

  16. Review of Beryllium Management Practices at Rocky Flats During Closure

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Operations | Department of Energy Review of Beryllium Management Practices at Rocky Flats During Closure Operations Review of Beryllium Management Practices at Rocky Flats During Closure Operations Administrative and engineering controls, along with detailed medical and training programs and strict adherence to all characterization, sampling, and work procedures ensured that exposure to beryllium by RFETS employees was minimized to the highest extent possible. PDF icon Review of Beryllium

  17. Best Management Practice #7: Faucets and Showerheads

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Most federal buildings have faucets in restrooms, kitchens, and laboratories. Many federal installations have showers, including barracks, family housing, recreation facilities, and locker rooms. Significant opportunity for water and energy savings exists for these fixtures when upgrading to efficient technology and employing conservation practices.

  18. Microsoft Word - EM_CM_3_Risk_Management_Best Practices and Gaps...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    EMCM3RiskManagementBest Practices and Gaps.doc Microsoft Word - EMCM3RiskManagementBest Practices and Gaps.doc Microsoft Word - EMCM3RiskManagementBest Practices and...

  19. Status of Environmental Management Initiatives to Accelerate the Reduction of Environmental Risks and Challenges Posed by the Legacy of the Cold War

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    2009-01-01

    Fifty years of nuclear weapons production and energy research in the United States during the Cold War generated large amounts of radioactive wastes, spent nuclear fuel (SNF), excess plutonium and uranium, thousands of contaminated facilities, and contaminated soil and groundwater. During most of that half century, the Nation did not have the environmental regulatory structure or nuclear waste cleanup technologies that exist today. The result was a legacy of nuclear waste that was stored and disposed of in ways now considered unacceptable. Cleaning up and ultimately disposing of these wastes is the responsibility of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). In 1989, DOE established the Office of Environmental Management (EM) to solve the large scale and technically challenging risks posed by the world's largest nuclear cleanup. This required EM to build a new nuclear cleanup infrastructure, assemble and train a technically specialized workforce, and develop the technologies and tools required to safely decontaminate, disassemble, stabilize, disposition, and remediate unique radiation hazards. The sites where nuclear activities produced legacy waste and contamination include the original Manhattan Project sites--Los Alamos, New Mexico; Hanford, Washington; and Oak Ridge, Tennessee--as well as major Cold War sites, such as Savannah River Site, South Carolina; the Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho; Rocky Flats Plant, Colorado; and Fernald, Ohio. Today EM has responsibility for nuclear cleanup activities at 21 sites covering more than two million acres in 13 states, and employs more than 30,000 Federal and contractor employees, including scientists, engineers and hazardous waste technicians. This cleanup poses unique, technically complex problems, which must be solved under the most hazardous of conditions, and which will require billions of dollars a year for several more decades. The EM program focus during its first 10 years was on managing the most urgent risks and maintaining safety at each site while negotiating state and Federal environmental compliance agreements. The program also concentrated on characterizing waste and nuclear materials and assessing the magnitude and extent of environmental contamination. By the late 1990s, EM had made significant progress in identifying and characterizing the extent of contamination and cleanup required and began transitioning from primarily a characterization and stabilization program to an active cleanup and closure program. During that time, EM formulated multi-year cleanup and closure plans, which contributed to cleanup progress; however, reducing the overall environmental risk associated with the cleanup program remained a challenge. In response, the Secretary of Energy directed a review of the EM program be undertaken. The resulting 'Top-to Bottom Review' re-directed the program focus from managing risks to accelerating the reduction of these risks.

  20. Best Management Practice #2: Information and Education Programs |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 2: Information and Education Programs Best Management Practice #2: Information and Education Programs Educating users about water conservation is essential to sustain the savings of water-efficient technologies and practices. It is not enough to install water-saving technology in a facility. New operation procedures, retrofits, and replacements are most effective when employees, contractors, and the public know what the new technologies or methods are and how to use them

  1. Risk Management Techniques and Practice Workshop Workshop Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Quinn, T; Zosel, M

    2008-12-02

    At the request of the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science (SC), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) hosted a two-day Risk Management Techniques and Practice (RMTAP) workshop held September 18-19 at the Hotel Nikko in San Francisco. The purpose of the workshop, which was sponsored by the SC/Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) program and the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)/Advanced Simulation and Computing (ASC) program, was to assess current and emerging techniques, practices, and lessons learned for effectively identifying, understanding, managing, and mitigating the risks associated with acquiring leading-edge computing systems at high-performance computing centers (HPCCs). Representatives from fifteen high-performance computing (HPC) organizations, four HPC vendor partners, and three government agencies attended the workshop. The overall workshop findings were: (1) Standard risk management techniques and tools are in the aggregate applicable to projects at HPCCs and are commonly employed by the HPC community; (2) HPC projects have characteristics that necessitate a tailoring of the standard risk management practices; (3) All HPCC acquisition projects can benefit by employing risk management, but the specific choice of risk management processes and tools is less important to the success of the project; (4) The special relationship between the HPCCs and HPC vendors must be reflected in the risk management strategy; (5) Best practices findings include developing a prioritized risk register with special attention to the top risks, establishing a practice of regular meetings and status updates with the platform partner, supporting regular and open reviews that engage the interests and expertise of a wide range of staff and stakeholders, and documenting and sharing the acquisition/build/deployment experience; and (6) Top risk categories include system scaling issues, request for proposal/contract and acceptance testing, and vendor technical or business problems. HPC, by its very nature, is an exercise in multi-level risk management. Every aspect of stewarding HPCCs into the petascale era, from identification of the program drivers to the details of procurement actions and simulation environment component deployments, represents unprecedented challenges and requires effective risk management. The fundamental purpose of this workshop was to go beyond risk management processes as such and learn how to weave effective risk management practices, techniques, and methods into all aspects of migrating HPCCs into the next generation of leadership computing systems. This workshop was a follow-on to the Petascale System Integration Workshop hosted by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL)/NERSC last year. It was intended to leverage and extend the risk management experience of the participants by looking for common best practices and unique processes that have been especially successful. This workshop assessed the effectiveness of tools and techniques that are or could be helpful in HPCC risk management, with a special emphasis on how practice meets process. As the saying goes: 'In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is'. Finally, the workshop brought together a network of experts who shared information as technology moves into the petascale era and beyond.

  2. An Effective Waste Management Process for Segregation and Disposal of Legacy Mixed Waste at Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hallman, Anne K.; Meyer, Dann; Rellergert, Carla A.; Schriner, Joseph A.

    1998-06-01

    Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico (SNL/NM) is a research and development facility that generates many highly diverse, low-volume mixed waste streams. Under the Federal Facility Compliance Act, SNL/NM must treat its mixed waste in storage to meet the Land Disposal Restrictions treatment standards. Since 1989, approximately 70 cubic meters (2500 cubic feet) of heterogeneous, poorly characterized and inventoried mixed waste was placed in storage that could not be treated as specified in the SNL/NM Site Treatment Plan. A process was created to sort the legacy waste into sixteen well- defined, properly characterized, and precisely inventoried mixed waste streams (Treatability Groups) and two low-level waste streams ready for treatment or disposal. From June 1995 through September 1996, the entire volume of this stored mixed waste was sorted and inventoried through this process. This process was planned to meet the technical requirements of the sorting operation and to identify and address the hazards this operation presented. The operations were routinely adapted to safely and efficiently handle a variety of waste matrices, hazards, and radiological conditions. This flexibility was accomplished through administrative and physical controls integrated into the sorting operations. Many Department of Energy facilities are currently facing the prospect of sorting, characterizing, and treating a large inventory of mixed waste. The process described in this paper is a proven method for preparing a diverse, heterogeneous mixed waste volume into segregated, characterized, inventoried, and documented waste streams ready for treatment or disposal.

  3. Development and Demonstration of Advanced Forecasting, Power and Environmental Planning and Management Tools and Best Practices

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Development and Demonstration of Advanced Forecasting, Power and Environmental Planning and Management Tools and Best Practices

  4. Controlling Beryllium Contaminated Material And Equipment For The Building 9201-5 Legacy Material Disposition Project

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Reynolds, T. D.; Easterling, S. D.

    2010-10-01

    This position paper addresses the management of beryllium contamination on legacy waste. The goal of the beryllium management program is to protect human health and the environment by preventing the release of beryllium through controlling surface contamination. Studies have shown by controlling beryllium surface contamination, potential airborne contamination is reduced or eliminated. Although there are areas in Building 9201-5 that are contaminated with radioactive materials and mercury, only beryllium contamination is addressed in this management plan. The overall goal of this initiative is the compliant packaging and disposal of beryllium waste from the 9201-5 Legacy Material Removal (LMR) Project to ensure that beryllium surface contamination and any potential airborne release of beryllium is controlled to levels as low as practicable in accordance with 10 CFR 850.25.

  5. PREFERRED WATERFLOOD MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR THE SPRABERRY TREND AREA

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    David S. Schechter

    2002-03-01

    The objective of this project is to significantly increase field-wide production in the Spraberry Trend in a short time frame by application of preferred practices for managing and optimizing water injection. A secondary and synergistic objective is purification and injection of produced water into Spraberry reservoirs.

  6. Process for Transition of Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title II Disposal Sites to the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management for Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    2012-03-01

    This document presents guidance for implementing the process that the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) will use for assuming perpetual responsibility for a closed uranium mill tailings site. The transition process specifically addresses sites regulated under Title II of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) but is applicable in principle to the transition of sites under other regulatory structures, such as the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program.

  7. Towards best practices for strategic information technology management

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Westerback, L.K.

    2000-07-01

    Federal agencies are under pressure to do more with less--to improve the services they provide to the public, with greater accountability for achieving results, more quickly and at lower cost. In a 1994 study of leading organizations, the General Accounting Office (GAO) identified 11 strategic information management (SIM) practices, which became the foundation of the Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996. In 1997, the Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council and the Industry Advisory Council prepared 20 case studies demonstrating the use of information technology to achieve a positive return on investment within the federal government. Focusing on these 20 case studies, this research first looked for evidence that supported or refuted each of GAO's SIM practices. Second, the research looked for best practices that may be unique to a federal environment. Third, the study identified other best practices.

  8. Best Management Practice #11: Commercial Kitchen Equipment | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy 1: Commercial Kitchen Equipment Best Management Practice #11: Commercial Kitchen Equipment Commercial kitchen equipment can be a significant water use in the non-residential sector. Water efficiency for commercial kitchen equipment is especially important because high-volume applications typically use mostly hot water. Ensuring that commercial kitchen equipment uses water efficiently affords both significant water and energy savings. Water-using commercial kitchen equipment includes:

  9. Best Management Practice #12: Laboratory and Medical Equipment | Department

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    of Energy 12: Laboratory and Medical Equipment Best Management Practice #12: Laboratory and Medical Equipment Equipment used in hospitals and laboratories can use significant amounts of water, offering the opportunity for substantial water savings by making a few small changes to how and when the water is used by the equipment. Water-consuming equipment in laboratories and medical facilities include water purification systems, sterilization and disinfection systems photographic and x-ray

  10. Best Management Practice #3: Distribution System Audits, Leak Detection,

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    and Repair | Department of Energy 3: Distribution System Audits, Leak Detection, and Repair Best Management Practice #3: Distribution System Audits, Leak Detection, and Repair A distribution system audit, or leak detection and repair program, may help federal facilities identify and reduce water losses and be better stewards of water as a resource. Overview Federal facilities in large campuses with expansive distribution systems can lose a significant amount of total water production and

  11. Best Management Practice #6: Toilets and Urinals | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    6: Toilets and Urinals Best Management Practice #6: Toilets and Urinals Toilets and urinals can account for nearly one-third of a building's water consumption. Inefficient or poorly maintained toilet and urinal fixtures can be a major source of water waste in commercial, residential, and institutional buildings; thus, significant savings are possible in this area. Overview Several types of toilets and urinals are available for residential, commercial, and industrial use. Builders, plumbers, and

  12. Best Management Practice #8: Steam Boiler Systems | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    8: Steam Boiler Systems Best Management Practice #8: Steam Boiler Systems Steam boilers are commonly used in large heating systems, institutional kitchens, or in facilities where large amounts of process steam are used. This equipment consumes varying amounts of water depending on system size and the amount of condensate returned. Operations and Maintenance Options To maintain water efficiency in operations and maintenance, federal agencies should do the following. Develop and implement a

  13. Recommended Practice for Patch Management of Control Systems

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Steven Tom; Dale Christiansen; Dan Berrett

    2008-12-01

    A key component in protecting a nations critical infrastructure and key resources is the security of control systems. The term industrial control system refers to supervisory control and data acquisition, process control, distributed control, and any other systems that control, monitor, and manage the nations critical infrastructure. Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources (CIKR) consists of electric power generators, transmission systems, transportation systems, dam and water systems, communication systems, chemical and petroleum systems, and other critical systems that cannot tolerate sudden interruptions in service. Simply stated, a control system gathers information and then performs a function based on its established parameters and the information it receives. The patch management of industrial control systems software used in CIKR is inconsistent at best and nonexistent at worst. Patches are important to resolve security vulnerabilities and functional issues. This report recommends patch management practices for consideration and deployment by industrial control systems owners.

  14. Fifty years of federal radioactive waste management: Policies and practices

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Bradley, R.G.

    1997-04-01

    This report provides a chronological history of policies and practices relating to the management of radioactive waste for which the US Atomic Energy Commission and its successor agencies, the Energy Research and Development Administration and the Department of Energy, have been responsible since the enactment of the Atomic Energy Act in 1946. The defense programs and capabilities that the Commission inherited in 1947 are briefly described. The Commission undertook a dramatic expansion nationwide of its physical facilities and program capabilities over the five years beginning in 1947. While the nuclear defense activities continued to be a major portion of the Atomic Energy Commission`s program, there was added in 1955 the Atoms for Peace program that spawned a multiplicity of peaceful use applications for nuclear energy, e.g., the civilian nuclear power program and its associated nuclear fuel cycle; a variety of industrial applications; and medical research, diagnostic, and therapeutic applications. All of these nuclear programs and activities generated large volumes of radioactive waste that had to be managed in a manner that was safe for the workers, the public, and the environment. The management of these materials, which varied significantly in their physical, chemical, and radiological characteristics, involved to varying degrees the following phases of the waste management system life cycle: waste characterization, storage, treatment, and disposal, with appropriate transportation linkages. One of the benefits of reviewing the history of the waste management program policies and practices if the opportunity it provides for identifying the lessons learned over the years. Examples are summarized at the end of the report and are listed in no particular order of importance.

  15. REFERRED WATERFLOOD MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR THE SPRABERRY TREND AREA

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    C. M. Sizemore; David S. Schechter

    2004-02-13

    This report describes the work performed during the first semi-annual third year of the project, ''Preferred Waterflood Management Practices for the Spraberry Trend Area''. The objective of this project is to significantly increase field-wide production in the Spraberry Trend in a short time frame through the application of preferred practices for managing and optimizing water injection. Our goal is to dispel negative attitudes and lack of confidence in water injection and to document the methodology and results for public dissemination to motivate waterflood expansion in the Spraberry Trend. To achieve this objective, in this period we concentrated our effort on analyzing production and injection data to optimize the reservoir management strategies for Germania Spraberry Unit. This study address the reservoir characterization and monitoring of the waterflooding project and propose alternatives of development of the current and future conditions of the reservoir to improve field performance. This research should serve as a guide for future work in reservoir simulation and can be used to evaluate various scenarios for additional development as well as to optimize the operating practices in the field. The results indicate that under the current conditions, a total of 1.410 million barrels of oil can be produced in the next 20 years through the 64 active wells and suggest that the unit can be successfully flooded with the current injection rate of 1600 BWPD and the pattern consisting of 6 injection wells aligned about 36 degrees respect to the major fracture orientation. In addition, a progress report on GSU waterflood pilot is reported for this period.

  16. Resource file: practical publications for energy management, edition III

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1980-03-01

    The Resource File is an in-depth bibliography of 166 practical and action-oriented energy conservation publications and materials. It is a reference tool, designed for Federal, state, and local energy managers or people who are asked to recommend how-to conservation guides to the public. Each listing describes a publication's intended audience and provides a summary of its contents. Included are operations and maintenance manuals, life-cycle costing handbooks, home insulation manuals, films on fuel-saving driving techniques, and courses devoted exclusively to home weatherization. 166 items.

  17. Status of Environmental Management Initiatives to Accelerate the Reduction of Environmental Risks and Challenges Posed by the Legacy of the Cold War

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This Report to Congress was prepared pursuant to section 3130 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2008, and summarized the EM program and initiatives to accelerate the reduction of environmental risks and challenges posed by the legacy of the Cold War.

  18. PREFERRED WATERFLOOD MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR THE SPRABERRY TREND AREA

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    David S. Schechter

    2004-08-31

    The naturally fractured Spraberry Trend Area is one of the largest reservoirs in the domestic U.S. and is the largest reservoir in area extent in the world. Production from Spraberry sands is found over a 2,500 sq. mile area and Spraberry reservoirs can be found in an eight county area in west Texas. Over 150 operators produce 65,000 barrels of oil per day (bopd) from the Spraberry Trend Area from more than 9,000 production wells. Recovery is poor, on the order of 7-10% due to the profoundly complicated nature of the reservoir, yet billions of barrels of hydrocarbons remain. We estimate over 15% of remaining reserves in domestic Class III reservoirs are in Spraberry Trend Area reservoirs. This tremendous domestic asset is a prime example of an endangered hydrocarbon resource in need of immediate technological advancements before thousands of wells are permanently abandoned. This report describes the final work of the project, ''Preferred Waterflood Management Practices for the Spraberry Trend Area.'' The objective of this project is to significantly increase field-wide production in the Spraberry Trend in a short time frame through the application of preferred practices for managing and optimizing water injection. Our goal is to dispel negative attitudes and lack of confidence in water injection and to document the methodology and results for public dissemination to motivate waterflood expansion in the Spraberry Trend. This objective has been accomplished through research in three areas: (1) detail historical review and extensive reservoir characterization, (2) production data management, and (3) field demonstration. This provides results of the final year of the three-year project for each of the three areas.

  19. PREFERRED WATERFLOOD MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR THE SPRABERRY TREND AREA

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    C. M. Sizemore; David S. Schechter

    2003-08-13

    This report describes the work performed during the second year of the project, ''Preferred Waterflood Management Practices for the Spraberry Trend Area''. The objective of this project is to significantly increase field-wide production in the Spraberry Trend in a short time frame through the application of preferred practices for managing and optimizing water injection. Our goal is to dispel negative attitudes and lack of confidence in water injection and to document the methodology and results for public dissemination to motivate waterflood expansion in the Spraberry Trend. To achieve this objective, in this period we concentrated our effort on characterization of Germania Unit using an analog field ET ODaniel unit and old cased hole neutron. Petrophysical Characterization of the Germania Spraberry units requires a unique approach for a number of reasons--limited core data, lack of modern log data and absence of directed studies within the unit. The need for characterization of the Germania unit has emerged as a first step in the review, understanding and enhancement of the production practices applicable within the unit and the trend area in general. In the absence or lack of the afore mentioned resources, an approach that will rely heavily on previous petrophysical work carried out in the neighboring ET O'Daniel unit (6.2 miles away), and normalization of the old log data prior to conventional interpretation techniques will be used. A log-based rock model has been able to guide successfully the prediction of pay and non-pay intervals within the ET O'Daniel unit, and will be useful if found applicable within the Germania unit. A novel multiple regression technique utilizing non-parametric transformations to achieve better correlations in predicting a dependent variable (permeability) from multiple independent variables (rock type, shale volume and porosity) will also be investigated in this study. A log data base includes digitized formats of Gamma Ray, Cased Hole Neutron, limited Resistivity and Neutron/Density/Sonic porosity logs over a considerable wide area. In addition, a progress report on GSU waterflood pilot is reported for this period. We have seen positive response of water injection on new wells. We believe by proper data acquisition and precise reservoir engineering techniques, any lack of confidence in waterflooding can be overcome. Therefore, we develop field management software to control a vast data from the pilot and to perform precise reservoir engineering techniques such as decline curve analysis, gas and oil material balances, bubble map plot and PVT analysis. The manual for this software is listed in the Appendix-A.

  20. Russian Experience in the Regulatory Supervision of the Uranium Legacy Sites - 12441

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kiselev, M.F.; Romanov, V.V.; Shandala, N.K.; Titov, A.V.; Kiselev, S.M.; Seregin, V.A.; Metlyaev, E.G.; Novikova, N.; Khokhlova, E.A.

    2012-07-01

    Management of the uranium legacy is accompanied with environmental impact intensity of which depends on the amount of the waste generated, the extent of that waste localization and environmental spreading. The question is: how hazardous is such impact on the environment and human health? The criterion for safety assurance is adequate regulation of the uranium legacy. Since the establishment of the uranium industry, the well done regulatory system operates in the FMBA of Russia. Such system covers inter alia, the uranium legacy. This system includes the extent laboratory network of independent control and supervision, scientific researches, regulative practices. The current Russian normative and legal basis of the regulation and its application practice has a number of problems relating to the uranium legacy, connected firstly with the environmental remediation. To improve the regulatory system, the urgent tasks are: -To introduce the existing exposure situation into the national laws and standards in compliance with the ICRP system. - To develop criteria for site remediation and return, by stages, to uncontrolled uses. The similar criteria have been developed within the Russian-Norwegian cooperation for the purpose of remediation of the sites for temporary storage of SNF and RW. - To consider possibilities and methods of optimization for the remediation strategies under development. - To separate the special category - RW resulted from uranium ore mining and dressing. The current Russian RW classification is based on the waste subdivision in terms of the specific activities. Having in mind the new RW-specific law, we receive the opportunity to separate some special category - RW originated from the uranium mining and milling. Introduction of such category can simplify significantly the situation with management of waste of uranium mining and milling processes. Such approach is implemented in many countries and approved by IAEA. The category of 'RW originated from uranium mining and milling' is to be introduced as the legal acts and regulatory documents. The recent ICRP recommendations provide the flexible approaches for solving of such tasks. The FMBA of Russia recognizes the problems of radiation safety assurance related to the legacy of the former USSR in the uranium mining industry. Some part of the regulatory problems assumes to be solved within the EurAsEC inter-state target program 'Reclamation of the territories of the EurAsEC member states affected by the uranium mining and milling facilities'. Using the example of the uranium legacy sites in Kyrgyz and Tajikistan which could result in the tran-boundary disasters and require urgent reclamation, the experience will be gained to be used in other states as well. Harmonization of the national legislations and regulative documents on radiation safety assurance is envisaged. (authors)

  1. DOE Awards Legacy Cleanup Contract | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Legacy Cleanup Contract DOE Awards Legacy Cleanup Contract September 23, 2015 - 6:00pm Addthis Media Contact Lynette Chafin, 513-246-0461, Lynette.Chafin@emcbc.doe.gov Cincinnati - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced the award of a Cost-Plus-Award Fee contract to Los Alamos National Security, LLC (LANS) of Los Alamos, NM. This bridge contract is for the Office of Environmental Management (EM) funded legacy cleanup activities at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). LANS is

  2. DOE - Office of Legacy Management

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Mound Site 2016 CERCLA Five-Year Review Survey Community involvement is an integral part of the Mound Site and the CERCLA Five-Year Review process. DOE welcomes your input and comments about the Mound Site in the survey. You may answer as many or as few questions as you feel comfortable answering. Responses will be accepted through April 30, 2016. Affiliation with the Mound site. Are you affiliated with the site or any site-related group (e.g., former worker, neighbor, former citizen group

  3. DOE - Office of Legacy Management

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Weldon Spring Site Five-Year Review Survey Section 121 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) requires that remedial actions, which result in any hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remaining at a site be subject to a five-year review. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is currently conducting its fourth five-year review at the Weldon Spring, Missouri,

  4. DOE - Office of Legacy Management --

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Home Last Updated: 1/1/0001

  5. DOE - Office of Legacy Management

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Last Updated:

  6. Solid waste management in Kolkata, India: Practices and challenges

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hazra, Tumpa; Goel, Sudha

    2009-01-15

    This paper presents an overview of current solid waste management (SWM) practices in Kolkata, India and suggests solutions to some of the major problems. More than 2920 ton/d of solid waste are generated in the Kolkata Municipal Corporation (KMC) area and the budget allocation for 2007-2008 was Rs. 1590 million (US$40 million), which amounts to Rs. 265/cap-y (US$6.7/cap-d) on SWM. This expenditure is insufficient to provide adequate SWM services. Major deficiencies were found in all elements of SWM. Despite 70% of the SWM budget being allocated for collection, collection efficiency is around 60-70% for the registered residents and less than 20% for unregistered residents (slum dwellers). The collection process is deficient in terms of manpower and vehicle availability. Bin capacity provided is adequate but locations were found to be inappropriate, thus contributing to the inefficiency of the system. At this time, no treatment is provided to the waste and waste is dumped on open land at Dhapa after collection. Lack of suitable facilities (equipment and infrastructure) and underestimates of waste generation rates, inadequate management and technical skills, improper bin collection, and route planning are responsible for poor collection and transportation of municipal solid wastes.

  7. Microsoft Word - EM_CM_3_Risk_Management_Best Practices and Gaps...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    risk procedures; available personnel and their skill levels relative to risk management; and available data and its validation. Attachment 2 lists the Best Practices...

  8. Environmental Remediation program completes legacy mercury cleanup...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Stories Legacy slope-side cleanup Environmental Remediation program completes legacy mercury cleanup near Smith's Marketplace Los Alamos National Laboratory performed a ...

  9. Simulating and evaluating best management practices for integrated landscape management scenarios in biofuel feedstock production

    DOE Public Access Gateway for Energy & Science Beta (PAGES Beta)

    Ha, Miae; Wu, May

    2015-09-08

    Sound crop and land management strategies can maintain land productivity and improve the environmental sustainability of agricultural crop and feedstock production. With this study, it evaluates a strategy of incorporating landscape design and management concepts into bioenergy feedstock production. It examines the effect of land conversion and agricultural best management practices (BMPs) on water quality (nutrients and suspended sediments) and hydrology. The strategy was applied to the watershed of the South Fork Iowa River in Iowa, where the focus was on converting low-productivity land to provide cellulosic biomass and implementing riparian buffers. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) wasmore » employed to simulate the impact at watershed and sub-basin scales. The study compared the representation of buffers by using trapping efficiency and area ratio methods in SWAT. Landscape design and management scenarios were developed to quantify water quality under (i) current land use, (ii) partial land conversion to switchgrass, and (iii) riparian buffer implementation. Results show that implementation of vegetative barriers and riparian buffer can trap the loss of total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and sediment significantly. The effect increases with the increase of buffer area coverage. Implementing riparian buffer at 30 m width is able to produce 4 million liters of biofuels. When low-productivity land (15.2% of total watershed land area) is converted to grow switchgrass, suspended sediment, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and nitrate loadings are reduced by 69.3%, 55.5%, 46.1%, and 13.4%, respectively. The results highlight the significant role of lower-productivity land and buffers in cellulosic biomass and provide insights into the design of an integrated landscape with a conservation buffer for future bioenergy feedstock production.« less

  10. Simulating and evaluating best management practices for integrated landscape management scenarios in biofuel feedstock production

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Ha, Miae; Wu, May

    2015-09-08

    Sound crop and land management strategies can maintain land productivity and improve the environmental sustainability of agricultural crop and feedstock production. With this study, it evaluates a strategy of incorporating landscape design and management concepts into bioenergy feedstock production. It examines the effect of land conversion and agricultural best management practices (BMPs) on water quality (nutrients and suspended sediments) and hydrology. The strategy was applied to the watershed of the South Fork Iowa River in Iowa, where the focus was on converting low-productivity land to provide cellulosic biomass and implementing riparian buffers. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was employed to simulate the impact at watershed and sub-basin scales. The study compared the representation of buffers by using trapping efficiency and area ratio methods in SWAT. Landscape design and management scenarios were developed to quantify water quality under (i) current land use, (ii) partial land conversion to switchgrass, and (iii) riparian buffer implementation. Results show that implementation of vegetative barriers and riparian buffer can trap the loss of total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and sediment significantly. The effect increases with the increase of buffer area coverage. Implementing riparian buffer at 30 m width is able to produce 4 million liters of biofuels. When low-productivity land (15.2% of total watershed land area) is converted to grow switchgrass, suspended sediment, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and nitrate loadings are reduced by 69.3%, 55.5%, 46.1%, and 13.4%, respectively. The results highlight the significant role of lower-productivity land and buffers in cellulosic biomass and provide insights into the design of an integrated landscape with a conservation buffer for future bioenergy feedstock production.

  11. Best Management Practice #5: Water-Efficient Irrigation

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Water efficiency must be considered from the initial irrigation system design phase through installation to ensure optimal performance. Consistent management and maintenance is also essential.

  12. Best Management Practices for Water Efficiency | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Pages Guidance on Meeting Executive Order 13693 Water Provisions Developing a Water Management Plan Water-Efficient Technology Opportunities Water Efficiency Case Studies...

  13. Municipal solid waste management in Malaysia: Practices and challenges

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Manaf, Latifah Abd Samah, Mohd Armi Abu; Zukki, Nur Ilyana Mohd

    2009-11-15

    Rapid economic development and population growth, inadequate infrastructure and expertise, and land scarcity make the management of municipal solid waste become one of Malaysia's most critical environmental issues. The study is aimed at evaluating the generation, characteristics, and management of solid waste in Malaysia based on published information. In general, the per capita generation rate is about 0.5-0.8 kg/person/day in which domestic waste is the primary source. Currently, solid waste is managed by the Ministry of Housing and Local Government, with the participation of the private sector. A new institutional and legislation framework has been structured with the objectives to establish a holistic, integrated, and cost-effective solid waste management system, with an emphasis on environmental protection and public health. Therefore, the hierarchy of solid waste management has given the highest priority to source reduction through 3R, intermediate treatment and final disposal.

  14. A Legacy of Benefit | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    A Legacy of Benefit A Legacy of Benefit Over more than three decades, FE research and development has established a legacy of significant achievement and return of value and benefits for the public funds invested. PDF icon Fossil Energy Research Benefits - A Legacy of Benefit More Documents & Publications Carbon Capture and Storage Return on Investment Fossil Energy FY 2013 Budget-in-Brief

  15. Sampling and Analysis Plan for U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Management Sites | Department of Energy Sampling and Analysis Plan for U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management Sites Sampling and Analysis Plan for U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management Sites This document is revised often. Every attempt is made to ensure the posted version is the most current. Submit a request through the Document Request form to obtain the most current version. PDF icon Sampling and Analysis Plan for U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy

  16. Guide to good practices for line and training manager activities

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1998-06-01

    The purpose of this guide is to provide direction for line and training managers in carrying out their responsibilities for training and qualifying personnel and to verify that existing training activities are effective.

  17. MCA 77-5-303 - Standards for Forest Practices in Streamside Management...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    77-5-303 - Standards for Forest Practices in Streamside Management Zones Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: MCA...

  18. Best Management Practice #2: Information and Education Programs

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Educating users about water conservation is essential to sustain the savings of water-efficient technologies and practices. It is not enough to install water-saving technology in a facility. New operation procedures, retrofits, and replacements are most effective when employees, contractors, and the public know what the new technologies or methods are and how to use them properly.

  19. Municipal waste management in Sicily: Practices and challenges

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Messineo, Antonio Panno, Domenico

    2008-07-01

    There are numerous problems yet to be solved in waste management and although efforts towards waste recovery and recycling have been made, landfills are still the most common method used in the EU and many other industrialised countries. Thermal disposal, particularly incineration, is a tested and viable alternative. In 2004, only 11% of the annual waste production of Italy was incinerated. Sicily, with over five million inhabitants, is the second largest region in Italy where waste management is now a critical problem. The use of landfills can no longer be considered a satisfactory environmental solution; therefore, new methods have to be chosen and waste-to-energy plants could provide an answer. This paper gives details of municipal solid waste management in Sicily following a new Waste Management Plan. Four waste-to-energy plants will generate electricity through a steam cycle; the feedstock will become the residue after material recovery, which is calculated as 20-40% weight of the collected municipal solid waste.

  20. NNSA Supports IAEA Regional Training in Zambia on Management Practices for

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Uranium | National Nuclear Security Administration IAEA Regional Training in Zambia on Management Practices for Uranium | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional

  1. U.S. Department of Energy to Host Press Call on Transition of Legacy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Cleanup Work at Los Alamos National Laboratory | Department of Energy News Media Contact 202 586 4940 U.S. Department of Energy to Host Press Call on Transition of Legacy Cleanup Work at Los Alamos National Laboratory WASHINGTON- On Wednesday, December 3, 2014, the Office of Environmental Management (EM) and the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) will host a press call to discuss the Department's plans for transitioning management and oversight of the legacy environmental

  2. Water management practices used by Fayetteville shale gas producers.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Veil, J. A.

    2011-06-03

    Water issues continue to play an important role in producing natural gas from shale formations. This report examines water issues relating to shale gas production in the Fayetteville Shale. In particular, the report focuses on how gas producers obtain water supplies used for drilling and hydraulically fracturing wells, how that water is transported to the well sites and stored, and how the wastewater from the wells (flowback and produced water) is managed. Last year, Argonne National Laboratory made a similar evaluation of water issues in the Marcellus Shale (Veil 2010). Gas production in the Marcellus Shale involves at least three states, many oil and gas operators, and multiple wastewater management options. Consequently, Veil (2010) provided extensive information on water. This current study is less complicated for several reasons: (1) gas production in the Fayetteville Shale is somewhat more mature and stable than production in the Marcellus Shale; (2) the Fayetteville Shale underlies a single state (Arkansas); (3) there are only a few gas producers that operate the large majority of the wells in the Fayetteville Shale; (4) much of the water management information relating to the Marcellus Shale also applies to the Fayetteville Shale, therefore, it can be referenced from Veil (2010) rather than being recreated here; and (5) the author has previously published a report on the Fayetteville Shale (Veil 2007) and has helped to develop an informational website on the Fayetteville Shale (Argonne and University of Arkansas 2008), both of these sources, which are relevant to the subject of this report, are cited as references.

  3. USEPA's hierarchy for municipal solid waste management: Theory vs. practice

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Matar, G. )

    1993-01-01

    This paper will address USEPA's hierarchy for municipal solid waste management (MSWM), which places source reduction and recycling above combustion and landfilling. Many have read this to mean that combustion and landfilling should only be considered after all recycling and reduction efforts have been explored. This mentality has not only left many communities in a MSWM capacity crisis, but also created planning problems for many others. Contrary to commonly held beliefs, it will be shown that the last two methods on the hierarchy should be considered from the beginning when planning for MSWM. It will also be shown that these methods are not antithetical to the first two methods, but are actually complimentary.

  4. Produced water volumes and management practices in the United States.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Clark, C. E.; Veil, J. A.

    2009-09-01

    Produced water volume generation and management in the United States are not well characterized at a national level. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) asked Argonne National Laboratory to compile data on produced water associated with oil and gas production to better understand the production volumes and management of this water. The purpose of this report is to improve understanding of produced water by providing detailed information on the volume of produced water generated in the United States and the ways in which produced water is disposed or reused. As the demand for fresh water resources increases, with no concomitant increase in surface or ground water supplies, alternate water sources, like produced water, may play an important role. Produced water is water from underground formations that is brought to the surface during oil or gas production. Because the water has been in contact with hydrocarbon-bearing formations, it contains some of the chemical characteristics of the formations and the hydrocarbons. It may include water from the reservoir, water previously injected into the formation, and any chemicals added during the production processes. The physical and chemical properties of produced water vary considerably depending on the geographic location of the field, the geologic formation, and the type of hydrocarbon product being produced. Produced water properties and volume also vary throughout the lifetime of a reservoir. Produced water is the largest volume by-product or waste stream associated with oil and gas exploration and production. Previous national produced water volume estimates are in the range of 15 to 20 billion barrels (bbl; 1 bbl = 42 U.S. gallons) generated each year in the United States (API 1988, 2000; Veil et al. 2004). However, the details on generation and management of produced water are not well understood on a national scale. Argonne National Laboratory developed detailed national-level information on the volume of produced water generated in the United States and the manner in which produced water is managed. This report presents an overview of produced water, summarizes the study, and presents results from the study at both the national level and the state level. Chapter 2 presents background information on produced water, describing its chemical and physical characteristics, where it is produced, and the potential impacts of produced water to the environment and to oil and gas operations. A review of relevant literature is also included. Chapter 3 describes the methods used to collect information, including outreach efforts to state oil and gas agencies and related federal programs. Because of the inconsistency in the level of detail provided by various state agencies, the approaches and assumptions used to extrapolate data values are also discussed. In Chapter 4, the data are presented, and national trends and observations are discussed. Chapter 5 presents detailed results for each state, while Chapter 6 presents results from federal sources for oil and gas production (i.e., offshore, onshore, and tribal lands). Chapter 7 summarizes the study and presents conclusions.

  5. WIPP contractor receives VPP Legacy of Stars Award 2013

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Management and Operating Contractor Recognized for Continuous Safety Performance CARLSBAD, N.M., September 20, 2013 - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) recognized Nuclear Waste Partnership LLC (NWP), the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) management and operating (M&O) contractor, with the Voluntary Protection Program (VPP) Legacy of Stars Award in latter August 2013. "Safety is central to everything we do, and achieving this elite designation validates our work and the safety-focused

  6. Legacy Cleanup Completion Project

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Presentation from the 2015 DOE National Cleanup Workshop by Christine Gelles, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary, Waste Management EM HQ.

  7. A Study of Outage Management Practices at Selected U.S. Nuclear Plants

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Lin, James C. [ABSG Consulting Inc., Irvine, CA (United States)

    2002-07-01

    This paper presents insights gained from a study of the outage management practices at a number of U.S. nuclear plants. The objective of the study was to conduct an in-depth review of the current practices of outage management at these selected plants and identify important factors that have contributed to the recent success of their outage performance. Two BWR-4, three BWR-6, and two 3-loop Westinghouse PWR plants were selected for this survey. The results of this study can be used to formulate outage improvement efforts for nuclear plants in other countries. (author)

  8. Huntington Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Faucet and Showerhead Replacement Project: Best Management Practice Case Study #7: Faucets and Showerheads, Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) (Fact Sheet)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    2009-12-01

    Case study overview of the Huntington Veterans Affairs Medical Center water efficiency program as part of FEMP's water efficiency best management practice series.

  9. Farm operator perceptions of water quality protective pest management practices: Selected survey findings

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Zimmerman, R.; Blair, J.; Webb, B.

    1995-12-01

    The use of pesticides in agriculture often poses a tension between water quality and environmental protection goals on the one hand and the viability of food supplies on the other hand. Pesticides used for field crops (e.g., corn, soy beans and wheat) have been detected in waterbodies, and according to some studies, are apparently finding their way into water supplies. A considerable amount of discretion is allowed in farm operator`s choice of pest management practices, and voluntary behavior becomes an important factor in promoting environmentally protective practices. Thus, it is important to know the attitudes of farmers who make pest management decisions including pesticide choices, toward the use of various water quality protective pest management practices. A number of studies show that more general environmental attitudes reflect a general world view that shapes attitudes toward particular environmental issues. This paper addresses the relationship between the more general environmental attitudes of farmers to their attitudes toward water quality issues and pest management practices which are protective of water quality. Some of the personal tradeoffs farmers are willing to make to enhance environmental controls on pesticides are also explored. Results are based on preliminary findings from a survey of farm operators who grow corn, soybeans and other field crops in three eastern states. The survey was conducted via a mail questionnaire to 2,700 farmers with telephone follow-up during the Fall of 1994. Implications of the findings for pest management in general are discussed.

  10. Review of Beryllium Management Practices at Rocky Flats During Closure Operations

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    DOE-Environmental Management DOE - Complex Wide Review of Beryllium Management Practices at Rocky Flats During Closure Operations Challenge Beryllium (Be) metal is used by DOE in weapons production, as a reactor moderator or reflector, and as a fuel element cladding. Workers who are exposed to high concentrations of beryllium often develop acute beryllium disease caused by the inhalation of beryllium dust or particles which can cause Be sensitivity or chronic Be disease (CBD), a disabling and

  11. EM ARRA Best Practices and Lessons Learned Workshop: Field Manager's Top Issues

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    EM ARRA BEST PRACTICES and LESSONS LEARNED WORKSHOP Waste Management Symposium Phoenix, AZ March 1, 2012 www.em.doe.gov 2 Field Manager's Top Issues Strategic Direction/Programmatic Decisions - Make remaining programmatic decisions so field can implement in expedited and efficient manner Streamline Requirements - Reduce reporting and new requirements from HQ to field Delegate to Field - Provide more tactical decision making to the field in the area of contracts, AE, and execution year

  12. 07%20SEATTLE%20Best%20Practices%20in%20Transportation%20Demand%20Management.pdf

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    | Department of Energy 07%20SEATTLE%20Best%20Practices%20in%20Transportation%20Demand%20Management.pdf 07%20SEATTLE%20Best%20Practices%20in%20Transportation%20Demand%20Management.pdf 07%20SEATTLE%20Best%20Practices%20in%20Transportation%20Demand%20Management.pdf PDF icon 07%20SEATTLE%20Best%20Practices%20in%20Transportation%20Demand%20Management.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1440-S-I: Mitigation Action Plan Completion Report U.S. Virgin Islands Transportation Petroleum Reduction

  13. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Grounds Maintenance: Best Management Practice Case Studies #4 and #5 - Water Efficient Landscape and Irrigation (Brochure)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    2009-08-01

    FEMP Water Efficiency Best Management Practices #4 and #5 Case Study: Overview of the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory grounds maintenance program and results.

  14. Best Management Practice #9: Single-Pass Cooling Equipment | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy 9: Single-Pass Cooling Equipment Best Management Practice #9: Single-Pass Cooling Equipment Single-pass or once-through cooling systems provide an opportunity for significant water savings. In these systems, water is circulated once through a piece of equipment and is then disposed down the drain. Types of equipment that typically use single-pass cooling include CAT scanners, degreasers, hydraulic equipment, condensers, air compressors, welding machines, vacuum pumps, ice machines,

  15. Thinking Globally: How ISO 50001 - Energy Management can make industrial energy efficiency standard practice

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    McKane, Aimee; Desai, Deann; Matteini, Marco; Meffert, William; Williams, Robert; Risser, Roland

    2009-08-01

    Industry utilizes very complex systems, consisting of equipment and their human interface, which are organized to meet the production needs of the business. Effective and sustainable energy efficiency programs in an industrial setting require a systems approach to optimize the integrated whole while meeting primary business requirements. Companies that treat energy as a manageable resource and integrate their energy program into their management practices have an organizational context to continually seek opportunities for optimizing their energy use. The purpose of an energy management system standard is to provide guidance for industrial and commercial facilities to integrate energy efficiency into their management practices, including fine-tuning production processes and improving the energy efficiency of industrial systems. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) has identified energy management as one of its top five priorities for standards development. The new ISO 50001 will establish an international framework for industrial, commercial, or institutional facilities, or entire companies, to manage their energy, including procurement and use. This standard is expected to achieve major, long-term increases in energy efficiency (20percent or more) in industrial, commercial, and institutional facilities and to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions worldwide.This paper describes the impetus for the international standard, its purpose, scope and significance, and development progress to date. A comparative overview of existing energy management standards is provided, as well as a discussion of capacity-building needs for skilled individuals to assist organizations in adopting the standard. Finally, opportunities and challenges are presented for implementing ISO 50001 in emerging economies and developing countries.

  16. Legacy: Order (2015-CE-14025) | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Legacy: Order (2015-CE-14025) Legacy: Order (2015-CE-14025) February 11, 2015 DOE ordered The Legacy Companies to pay a $8,000 civil penalty after finding Legacy had failed to certify that refrigerator Maxx-Ice brand basic model MCR3U complies with the applicable energy conservation standards. PDF icon Legacy: Order (2015-CE-14025) More Documents & Publications Legacy: Proposed Penalty (2015-CE-14025) Maxlite: Order (2015-CE-27018) Electrolux: Order (2015-CE-14020)

  17. 2013 Federal Energy and Water Management Award Winners Frank Cope, Bethany

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Mills, William Nelligan, Jodie Petersen, and Scott Thomas | Department of Energy Frank Cope, Bethany Mills, William Nelligan, Jodie Petersen, and Scott Thomas 2013 Federal Energy and Water Management Award Winners Frank Cope, Bethany Mills, William Nelligan, Jodie Petersen, and Scott Thomas PDF icon fewm13_nps_mesaverde_highres.pdf PDF icon fewm13_nps_mesaverde.pdf More Documents & Publications Sustainable Disposal Cell Covers: Legacy Management Practices, Improvements, and Long-Term

  18. GTA: The NPB legacy

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Schneider, J.D.

    1994-12-31

    Technical developments on the neutral particle beam (NPB) program over a period of 18 years led to significant developments in accelerator technology. Many of these state-of-the-art technologies were integrated into the Ground Test Accelerator (GTA). GTA beam experiments were completed on components and systems that included the ion source through low-energy DTL modules. Provisions for beam funneling, matching, cryogenic (20 K) operation, detailed transverse and longitudinal beam characterization, combined with state-of-the-art accelerator and rf controls made this GTA system unique. The authors will summarize the types and magnitudes of these technology advances that culminated in the fabrication of the 24 MeV front end of the GTA. A number of highly instrumented beam experiments at several stages validated the innovative designs. Applications of GTA-developed technology to several new accelerators will highlight the practical benefits of the GTA technology integration.

  19. Identification, Verification, and Compilation of Produced Water Management Practices for Conventional Oil and Gas Production Operations

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Rachel Henderson

    2007-09-30

    The project is titled 'Identification, Verification, and Compilation of Produced Water Management Practices for Conventional Oil and Gas Production Operations'. The Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission (IOGCC), headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, is the principal investigator and the IOGCC has partnered with ALL Consulting, Inc., headquartered in Tulsa, Oklahoma, in this project. State agencies that also have partnered in the project are the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, the Montana Board of Oil and Gas Conservation, the Kansas Oil and Gas Conservation Division, the Oklahoma Oil and Gas Conservation Division and the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. The objective is to characterize produced water quality and management practices for the handling, treating, and disposing of produced water from conventional oil and gas operations throughout the industry nationwide. Water produced from these operations varies greatly in quality and quantity and is often the single largest barrier to the economic viability of wells. The lack of data, coupled with renewed emphasis on domestic oil and gas development, has prompted many experts to speculate that the number of wells drilled over the next 20 years will approach 3 million, or near the number of current wells. This level of exploration and development undoubtedly will draw the attention of environmental communities, focusing their concerns on produced water management based on perceived potential impacts to fresh water resources. Therefore, it is imperative that produced water management practices be performed in a manner that best minimizes environmental impacts. This is being accomplished by compiling current best management practices for produced water from conventional oil and gas operations and to develop an analysis tool based on a geographic information system (GIS) to assist in the understanding of watershed-issued permits. That would allow management costs to be kept in line with the specific projects and regions, which increases the productive life of wells and increases the ultimate recoverable reserves in the ground. A case study was conducted in Wyoming to validate the applicability of the GIS analysis tool for watershed evaluations under real world conditions. Results of the partnered research will continue to be shared utilizing proven methods, such as on the IGOCC Web site, preparing hard copies of the results, distribution of documented case studies, and development of reference and handbook components to accompany the interactive internet-based GIS watershed analysis tool. Additionally, there have been several technology transfer seminars and presentations. The goal is to maximize the recovery of our nation's energy reserves and to promote water conservation.

  20. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Massachusetts Institute...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Cambridge , Massachusetts MA.01-1 Evaluation Year: 1986 MA.01-2 Site Operations: Facility was...

  1. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- CEER

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Rico Center for Energy and Environment Research (CEER), Puerto Rico Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdficon Key Documents Fact Sheet Please be...

  2. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Ashtabula

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdficon Key Documents Fact Sheet Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Submit a FOIA Request for...

  3. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Bonus

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Puerto Rico Boiling Nuclear Superheater (BONUS), Puerto Rico, Decommissioned Reactor Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdficon Key Documents Fact...

  4. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Illinois

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Illinois Illinois Illinois Sites Chicago North Site Chicago South Site Granite City Site Madison Site Site A/Plot M

  5. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Massachuetts

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Massachuetts Massachusetts ma_map2 Beverly Site Indian Orchard

  6. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Missouri

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Missouri Missouri mo_map Missouri University Research Reactor Site Weldon Spring

  7. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Nevada

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Nevada Nevada nvmap Central Nevada Test Area Site Shoal Site Last Updated: 12/14

  8. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- New Jersey

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Jersey New Jersey New Jersey Sites Jersey City Site New Brunswick Site Wayne Site

  9. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- New Mexico

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Mexico New Mexico NM_map_2012 Acid/Pueblo Canyon Site Ambrosia Lake Site Bayo Canyon Site Bluewater Site Chupadera Mesa Site Gasbuggy Site Gnome-Coach Site Inhalation Toxicology Laboratory L-Bar Site Shiprock Site

  10. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- New York

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    York New York NY Sites 2013 Buffalo Site New York Site Niagara Falls Storage Site Vicinity Properties Tonawanda North Site, Unit 1 Tonawanda North Site, Unit 2

  11. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Ohio

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Ohio Ohio Ohio Sites Columbus East Site Columbus Sites Fairfield Site Fernald Preserve Hamilton Site Mound Site Oxford Site Painesville Site Piqua Decommissioned Reactor Site Toledo Site Last Updated: 1/14/2016

  12. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Oregon

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Oregon Oregon Oregon Sites Albany Site Lakeview Disposal Site Lakeview Processing Site Last Updated: 12/10

  13. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Pennsylvania

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Sites Aliquippa Site Burrell Site Canonsburg Disposal Site Springdale Site

  14. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Utah

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Utah Utah ut_map Green River Site Mexican Hat Site Monticello Site Salt Lake City Sites (2)

  15. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Wyoming

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Wyoming Wyoming wy_map Riverton Site Shirley Basin South Site Spook Site Last Updated: 12/10

  16. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Columbus

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Columbus, Ohio, Sites Other Regulatory Framework columbusClosure2013 The Columbus, Ohio, Sites consist of two separate properties owned by the Battelle Memorial Institute: the King Avenue site, located in the city of Columbus, and the West Jefferson site, located approximately 15 miles west of Columbus. Battelle conducted extensive nuclear research at both locations for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and its predecessor agencies between 1943 and 1986. The facilities have been decontaminated

  17. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Durango

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Durango Durango Sites durango_map Durango Disposal Site Durango Processing Site Last Updated: 12/14

  18. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Edge

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    South Dakota Edgemont, South Dakota, Disposal Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet 2014 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title II Disposal Sites-Edgemont, South Dakota, Disposal Site Long-Term Surveillance Plan for the DOE Tennessee Valley Authority (UMTRCA Title II) Disposal Site, Edgemont, South Dakota Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely

  19. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Falls

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Texas Falls City, Texas, Disposal Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet 2014 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title I Disposal Sites-Falls City, Texas, Disposal Site April 2015 Groundwater Sampling at the Falls City, Texas, Disposal Site Ground Water Compliance Action Plan Long-Term Surveillance Plan for the U.S. Department of Energy Falls City Uranium Mill Tailings

  20. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Gunnison

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Gunnison Gunnison Sites gun_map Gunnison Disposal Site Gunnison Processing Site

  1. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Hallam

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Nebraska Hallam, Nebraska, Decommissioned Reactor Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet 2015 Annual Inspection and Status Report for the Hallam, Nebraska, Decommissioned Reactor Site Data Validation Package-June 2014 Groundwater Sampling Long-Term Surveillance Plan for the Decommissioned Hallam Nuclear Power Facility Hallam, Nebraska Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Submit a FOIA Request for

  2. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- ITL

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    New Mexico Inhalation Toxicology Laboratory, New Mexico, Site Other Regulatory Framework ITL_map The Inhalation Toxicology Laboratory site was a research facility originally created by the Atomic Energy Commission, a predecessor agency of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), to study respiratory health issues. In 1996, as a result of decreasing DOE funding for the type of work conducted at the laboratory, DOE awarded a Cooperative Agreement to the Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute (Lovelace)

  3. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Lowman

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Idaho Lowman, Idaho, Disposal Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet 2014 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title I Disposal Sites-Lowman, Idaho, Disposal Site Long-Term Surveillance Plan for the U.S. Department of Energy Lowman, Idaho, (UMTRCA Title I) Disposal Site Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Submit a FOIA Request for documents

  4. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Maxey

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Kentucky Maxey Flats, Kentucky, Site Key Documents and Links Fact Sheet pdf_icon Project Background pdf_icon U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Maxey Flats Web Page Disclaimer Please be green - do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary Submit a FOIA Request for documents not available through this website. All Site Documents All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon background Maxey Flats Disposal Site: Remedial Investigation Project Background Fact Sheet - Maxey Flats

  5. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Naturita

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Naturita Naturita Sites naturita_map Naturita Disposal Site Naturita Processing Site Last Updated: 12/15

  6. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Oxnard

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    California Oxnard, California, Site An Oakland Operations Office site oxnard_map The Oxnard site occupies 13.75 acres in an industrial section of Oxnard, California, about 50 miles northwest of Los Angeles. Allis-Chalmers, a farm implement manufacturing company, purchased the property in 1949 and built a manufacturing plant that operated from 1949 to 1981. For more information about the Oxnard site, view the fact sheet. Site Document and Links Contact Us Last Updated: 1/5

  7. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Park

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    West Virginia Parkersburg, West Virginia, Disposal Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet 2015 Annual Inspection Report for the Parkersburg, West Virginia, Disposal Site Data Validation Package-November 2013 Groundwater Sampling Long-Term Surveillance Plan for the Parkersburg, West Virginia, Disposal Site Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Submit a FOIA Request for documents not available

  8. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Rifle

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Rifle Rifle Sites rifle_map Rifle Disposal Site Rifle New Processing Site Rifle Old Processing Site

  9. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Rocky

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Rocky Flats Site, Colorado A CERCLA and/or RCRA Site RockyFlats2014 Remediation at the Rocky Flats Site was conducted in accordance with Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and/or Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) regulations. Responsibility for operation and maintenance of the site was transferred to LM in October 2005 and requires operation and maintenance of remedial action systems, routine inspection and maintenance, records-related

  10. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Salmon2

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Mississippi Salmon, Mississippi, Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Quitclaim Deed: Assign Surface Real Estate to State of Mississippi October 2014 Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling at the Salmon, Mississippi, Site Groundwater Sampling and Analysis Report Salmon, Mississippi, Site Calendar Year 2013 Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Submit a FOIA Request for documents not available

  11. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Sherwood

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Washington Sherwood, Washington, Disposal Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet 2014 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title II Disposal Sites-Sherwood, Washington, Disposal Site July 2015 Groundwater Sampling at the Sherwood, Washington, Disposal Site Long-Term Surveillance Plan for the DOE Sherwood Project (UMTRCA Title II) Reclamation Cell Wellpinit, Washington Please be

  12. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Slick Rock

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Slick Rock Slick Rock Sites slick_map Slick Rock Disposal Site Slick Rock Processing Site Last Updated: 12/14

  13. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Vallecitos

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    California Vallecitos Nuclear Center, California, Site Other Regulatory Framework 2014Sunol-GEVNC The Vallecitos Nuclear Center (VNC), a 1,600-acre nuclear research facility and the site of a former electricity-generating nuclear power plant, is located in Sunol, California, about 40 miles east of San Francisco. The first commercially owned nuclear plant to supply power to the general public was operated at the site from 1957 until 1963. From 1965 through 1975, VNC was used to conduct research

  14. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Alaska

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Alaska Alaska akmap Amchitka Site Chariot

  15. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Arizona

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Arizona Arizona az_map Monument Valley Processing Site Tuba City Disposal

  16. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- California

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    California California CA_map_burris Berkeley Site Burris Park Site General Atomics Hot Cell Facility Site Vallecitos Nuclear Center Site Geothermal Test Facility Site Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research Site Oxnard Site

  17. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Colorado

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Colorado Colorado 2014co Durango Sites (2) Grand Junction Sites (3) Gunnison Sites (2) Maybell Site Maybell West Site Naturita Sites (2) Rifle Sites (3) Rio Blanco Site Rocky Flats Site Rulison Site Slick Rock Sites (2) Last Updated: 12/15/2015

  18. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- AMB

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Ambrosia Lake, New Mexico, Disposal Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet 2014 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title I Disposal Sites-Ambrosia Lake, New Mexico, Disposal Site November 2014 Water Sampling at the Ambrosia Lake, New Mexico, Disposal Site Ground Water Compliance Action Plan Long-Term Surveillance Plan for the Ambrosia Lake, New Mexico, Disposal Site Please be

  19. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Amchitka

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Alaska Amchitka, Alaska, Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Alternatives Analysis Amchitka Island Mud Pit Cap Repair, Amchitka, Alaska Long-Term Surveillance Plan for the U.S. Department of Energy Amchitka, Alaska, Site Record of Decision for Amchitka Surface Closure, Alaska Biological Monitoring Results Amchitka Island, Alaska,Biological Monitoring Report 2011 Sampling Results September 2013 Biological Monitoring Results Fact

  20. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Blue

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    New Mexico Bluewater, New Mexico, Disposal Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet May and June 2015 Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling at the Bluewater, New Mexico, Disposal Site 2014 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title II Disposal Site-Bluewater, New Mexico, Disposal Site Long-Term Surveillance Plan for the DOE Bluewater (UMTRCA Title II) Disposal Site, Near Grants,

  1. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Burrell

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Pennsylvania Burrell, Pennsylvania, Disposal Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet 2014 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title I Disposal Sites-Burrell, Pennsylvania, Disposal Site Data Validation Package-January 2014 Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling Long-Term Surveillance Plan for the U.S. Department of Energy Burrell Vicinity Property, Blairsville, Pennsylvania

  2. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Canon

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Pennsylvania Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, Disposal Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet 2014 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title I Disposal Sites-Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, Disposal Site Data Validation Package-November 2013 Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling Ground Water Compliance Action Plan and Application for Alternate Concentration Limit Application (ACL) for the

  3. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Central

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Nevada Central Nevada Test Area (CNTA), Nevada, Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet 2014 Groundwater Monitoring Report Central Nevada Test Area, Corrective Action Unit 443 Closure Report Central Nevada Test Area Subsurface Corrective Action Unit 443 December 2014 Groundwater Sampling at the Central Nevada Test Area Internal links Central Nevada Test Area Document Archives Please be green. Do not print these documents unless

  4. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Chariot

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Alaska Chariot, Alaska, Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Submit a FOIA Request for documents not available through this website. All Site Documents All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Fact Sheets Assessment and Remedial Action Reports Finding of No Significant Impact Geologic Investigations Other Documents Fact Sheets Chariot, Alaska, Site

  5. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Columbus

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Ohio Columbus, Ohio, Sites Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Submit a FOIA Request for documents not available through this website. All Site Documents All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Columbus, Ohio, Sites Fact Sheet August 3, 2015 Other Documents Closeout of BCLDP Oversight Assessment Report OA-04-13 January 11, 2005

  6. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Fernald Benefits

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Ohio > Fernald Benefits Fernald Preserve, Ohio Former Fernald Workers' Employment Verification and Benefits Information Employment Verification Employment verification is made through a Privacy Act request. Medical and Life Plan Benefit Service Center All inquiries should be directed to ADP, (866) 553-5867, email: fernaldbenefits@adp.com. Retirement (Pension) Plan All inquiries should be directed to MetLife, (800) 638-5656. 401(k) Plan All inquiries should be directed to Hewitt Financial

  7. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Gasbuggy

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    New Mexico Gasbuggy, New Mexico, Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Interagency Agreement between DOE, BLM, and USDA Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Submit a FOIA Request for documents not available through this website. Status of Pending Decision Documents Long-Term Surveillance Plan Under development All Site Documents All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Fact Sheet Data

  8. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Geothermal

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Geothermal Test Facility, California Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Submit a FOIA Request for documents not available through this website. All Site Documents All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Fact Sheet Other Documents Fact Sheet Geothermal Test Facility, California, Site Fact Sheet December 16, 2015 Other Documents Geothermal Test Facility

  9. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Gnome

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    New Mexico Gnome-Coach, New Mexico, Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Submit a FOIA Request for documents not available through this website. Status of Pending Decision Documents Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Plan Under development All Site Documents All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Fact Sheet Data Validation Package Monitoring and

  10. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- ITL

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Inhalation Toxicology Laboratory, New Mexico, Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Submit a FOIA Request for documents not available through this website. All Site Documents All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Fact Sheet Other Documents Fact Sheet Inhalation Toxicology Laboratory (ITL), New Mexico, Site Fact Sheet August 10, 2015 Other Documents

  11. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- LEHR

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    California Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research (LEHR), California, Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Record of Decision Proposed Plan Overview of the Proposed Plan DOE Areas Remedial investigation Report Feasibility Study Risk Assessment Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Plan Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan CERCLA Administrative Record Land-Use Covenant Please be green. Do not print these documents

  12. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Lbar

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    New Mexico L-Bar, New Mexico, Disposal Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet 2014 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title II Disposal Site-L-Bar, New Mexico, Disposal Site Data Validation Package-November 2013 Water Sampling Long-Term Surveillance Plan for the U.S. Department of Energy L-Bar, New Mexico, (UMTRCA Title II) Disposal Site, Seboyeta, New Mexico Please be green.

  13. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- MURR

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Missouri Missouri University Research Reactor (MURR), Missouri, Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Submit a FOIA Request for documents not available through this website. All Site Documents All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Fact Sheet Other Documents Fact Sheet Missouri University Research Reactor Site Fact Sheet August 10, 2015 Other

  14. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Maybell

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Maybell, Colorado, Disposal Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet 2014 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title I Disposal Sites-Maybell, Colorado, Disposal Site Long-Term Surveillance Plan for the Maybell, Colorado (UMTRCA Title I) Disposal Site Moffat County, Colorado Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Submit a FOIA Request for

  15. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Monticello

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Utah Monticello, Utah, Disposal and Processing Sites Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Groundwater Remedy Improvement Plan at the Monticello, Utah, Site April 2015 Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling at the Monticello, Utah, Processing Site Explanation of Significant Difference for the Monticello Mill Tailings Site Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Plan for the Monticello NPL Sites Monticello Mill Tailings Site Operable Unit

  16. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Mound Site

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Ohio Mound, Ohio, Site Site Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Annual Institutional Controls Report Community Involvement Plan Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Plan Operations and Maintenance Plan Internal Links Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Administrative Records External Links Mound Development Corporation (MDC) Ohio Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Environmental Protection

  17. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Oxnard

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    California Oxnard, California, Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Submit a FOIA Request for documents not available through this website. All Site Documents All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Fact Sheet Other Documents Fact Sheet Oxnard, California, Site Fact Sheet December 16, 2015 Other Documents Summary Environmental Site Assessment Report

  18. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Piqua

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Ohio Piqua, Ohio, Decommissioned Reactor Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet 2013 Annual Inspection and Radiological Survey Results for the Piqua, Ohio, Decommissioned Reactor Site Long-Term Surveillance Plan for the Piqua Nuclear Power Facility, Piqua, Ohio Postclosure Agreement Between City of Piqua, Ohio, and U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, 1968 Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Submit a

  19. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Rio

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Rio Blanco, Colorado, Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet May 2015 Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling at the Rio Blanco, Colorado, Site 2015 Long-Term Hydrologic Monitoring Program Sampling and Analysis Results at Rio Blanco, Colorado Internal Links Natural Gas Well Monitoring Results Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Submit a FOIA Request for documents not available through this

  20. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Riverton

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Riverton, Wyoming Processing Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Refining the site conceptual model at a former uranium mill site in Riverton, Wyoming, USA (Environmental Earth Sciences journal) Enhanced Characterization of Surficial Aquifer (fact sheet) Where Does My Drinking Water Come From? (fact sheet) May 10, 2012: Data Review and Validation Report of May 3, 2012, Sampling Event ALS Environmental Laboratory Report on May 3,

  1. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Rocky

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Rocky Flats Site, Colorado Key Documents and Links Fact Sheet pdf_icon Quarterly Report of Site Surveillance and Maintenance Activities Third Quarter Calendar Year 2015 pdf_icon Quarterly Report of Site Surveillance and Maintenance Activities Third Quarter Calendar Year 2015 Presentation pdf_icon Annual Report of Site Surveillance and Maintenance Activities at the Rocky Flats, Colorado, Site Calendar Year 2014 pdf_icon Overview of the Rocky Flats Evaluation of Water Quality Variability: April

  2. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Rocky Benefits

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Colorado > Rocky Benefits Rocky Flats Site, Colorado Benefits Administration Rocky Flats Benefits Administration Rocky Flats Benefits Center P.O Box 9735 Providence, RI 02940 Phone - (866) 296-5036 Fax - (888) 501-9768 Medical and Life Insurance Administration Pension Administration General Benefits Questions Death Reporting Address Changes Benefits Issue Resolutions Leanna Nighswonger (509) 373-1419 Leanna_c_Nighswonger@rl.gov Last Updated: 11/20/2014

  3. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Rulison

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Rulison, Colorado, Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Deed Restriction June 2015 Natural Gas and Produced Water Sampling at the Rulison, Colorado, Site Final Rulison Path Forward 2015 Long-Term Hydrologic Monitoring Program Sampling and Analysis Results Report for Project Rulison, Colorado Monitoring Plan Internal Links Tritium Transport Model Natural Gas Well Monitoring Results External Links Office of Scientific & Technical

  4. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Ship

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    New Mexico Shiprock, New Mexico, Disposal Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Communications and Outreach Plan for the Navajo Nation Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Sites 2014 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title I Disposal Sites-Shiprock, New Mexico, Disposal Site March 2015 Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling at the Shiprock, New Mexico Disposal Site

  5. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Shirley

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Wyoming Shirley Basin South, Wyoming, Disposal Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet 2014 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title II Disposal Sites-Shirley Basin South, Wyoming, Disposal Site July 2015 Groundwater Sampling at the Shirley Basin South, Wyoming, Disposal Site Long-Term Surveillance Plan for the U.S. Department of Energy Shirley Basin South (UMTRCA Title II)

  6. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Shoal

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Nevada Shoal, Nevada, Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet 2014 Groundwater Monitoring Report Project Shoal Area, Subsurface Corrective Action Unit 447 May 2014 Groundwater Sampling at the Shoal, Nevada, Site Data Validation Package-May 2013 Groundwater Sampling Groundwater Model Validation for the Project Shoal Area, Corrective Action Unit 447 NDEP Shoal Document Archives Disclaimer Please be green. Do not print these documents

  7. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Spook

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Spook, Wyoming, Disposal Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet 2014 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title I Disposal Sites-Spook, Wyoming, Disposal Site Ground Water Compliance Action Plan Final Long-Term Surveillance Plan for the Spook, Wyoming, Disposal Site Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Submit a FOIA Request for documents not

  8. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Tuba

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Arizona Tuba City Disposal Site, Arizona Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet August 2015 Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling at the Tuba City, Arizona, Disposal Site 2014 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title I Disposal Sites-Tuba City, Arizona, Disposal Site Communications and Outreach Plan for the Navajo Nation Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Sites Long-Term

  9. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Vallecitos

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    California Vallecitos Nuclear Center, California, Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Submit a FOIA Request for documents not available through this website. All Site Documents All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Vallecitos Nuclear Center, CA, Site Fact Sheet August 3, 2015 Historical documents may contain links to outside

  10. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Visitors Center

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Ohio > Fernald > Visitors Center > Visitors Center Fernald Preserve, Ohio Visitors Center Fernald Visitors Center Visitors Center Directions Event Calendar Community Meeting Room, Program Shelter, and Resource Room Program/Speaker Request Brochures Fact Sheets Technical Papers BioBlitz Geocaching Pets Policy The Fernald Preserve Visitors Center is a 10,000-square-foot green building that celebrates the rich and varied history of the Fernald site. Information on the site's natural,

  11. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Weldon

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Missouri Weldon Spring, Missouri, Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheets EPA Response to Comments and FFA Finalization Federal Facility Agreement Fourth Five-Year Review Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Plan - December 2008 Site History Weldon Spring Site Annual Report for Calendar Year 2014 Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Submit a FOIA Request for documents not available through this

  12. Comprehensive Legacy Management and Institutional Controls Plan

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Section Description of Modification Driver/Technical Information Section 1.0 Provided additional detail in Section 1.1 on the upcoming CERCLA 5-year review to be finalized in September 2016. Section 2.0 Figure 3 was updated to include subgrade utility corridors off-property in the South Plume Area. Section 3.0 Section 3.0 was updated to provide information on the 2015 restoration projects. Section 4.0 No significant changes. Section 5.0 No significant changes. Section 6.0 No significant changes.

  13. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Fernald Reports

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Reports Fernald Preserve, Ohio Site Reports All reports below are Adobe Documents PDF Site Environmental Reports 2014 Site Environmental Report 2013 Site Environmental Report 2012 Site Environmental Report 2011 Site Environmental Report 2010 Site Environmental Report 2009 Site Environmental Report 2008 Site Environmental Report 2007 Site Environmental Report 2006 Site Environmental Report 2005 Site Environmental Report 2004 Site Environmental Report Inspection Reports Combined Site and OSDF

  14. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- GJD

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Disposal Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet 2014 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title I Disposal Sites-Grand Junction, Colorado, Disposal Site August 2015 Groundwater Sampling at the Grand Junction, Colorado, Disposal Site Long-Term Surveillance Plan Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Submit a FOIA Request for documents not

  15. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- GJO

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Junction Colorado, Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Annual Inspection Report Annual Site Environmental Report February 2015 Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling at the Grand Junction, Colorado, Site Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Plan (June 2006) Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Submit a FOIA Request for documents not available through this website. All Site Documents All

  16. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- GJP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Processing Site Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet 2011 5-Year Inspection and Site Status Report for the Grand Junction, Colorado, UMTRCA Title I Processing Site Data Validation Package-January 2011 Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling Ground Water Compliance Action Plan for the Grand Junction,Colorado, UMTRA Project Site Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Submit a FOIA Request for documents

  17. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Rulison Monitoring

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Rulison Monitoring Rulison, Colorado, Site Natural Gas Well Monitoring Results Monitoring Results Natural Gas Wells Near Project Rulison Third Quarter 2015 Monitoring Results for Natural Gas Wells Near Project Rulison Second Quarter 2015 Monitoring Results for Natural Gas Wells Near Project Rulison First Quarter 2015 Monitoring Results for Natural Gas Wells Near Project Rulison Third Quarter 2014 Monitoring Results for Natural Gas Wells Near Project Rulison Second Quarter 2014 Monitoring Results

  18. ENHANCING RESERVOIR MANAGEMENT IN THE APPALACHIAN BASIN BY IDENTIFYING TECHNICAL BARRIER AND PREFERRED PRACTICES

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Ronald R. McDowell; Khashayar Aminian; Katharine L. Avary; John M. Bocan; Michael Ed. Hohn; Douglas G. Patchen

    2003-09-01

    The Preferred Upstream Management Practices (PUMP) project, a two-year study sponsored by the United States Department of Energy (USDOE), had three primary objectives: (1) the identification of problems, problematic issues, potential solutions and preferred practices related to oil production; (2) the creation of an Appalachian Regional Council to oversee and continue this investigation beyond the end of the project; and (3) the dissemination of investigative results to the widest possible audience, primarily by means of an interactive website. Investigation and identification of oil production problems and preferred management practices began with a Problem Identification Workshop in January of 2002. Three general issues were selected by participants for discussion: Data Management; Reservoir Engineering; and Drilling Practices. At the same meeting, the concept of the creation of an oversight organization to evaluate and disseminated preferred management practices (PMP's) after the end of the project was put forth and volunteers were solicited. In-depth interviews were arranged with oil producers to gain more insight into problems and potential solutions. Project members encountered considerable reticence on the part of interviewees when it came to revealing company-specific production problems or company-specific solutions. This was the case even though interviewees were assured that all responses would be held in confidence. Nevertheless, the following production issues were identified and ranked in order of decreasing importance: Water production including brine disposal; Management of production and business data; Oil field power costs; Paraffin accumulation; Production practices including cementing. An number of secondary issues were also noted: Problems associated with Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) and Waterflooding; Reservoir characterization; Employee availability, training, and safety; and Sale and Purchase problems. One item was mentioned both in interviews and in the Workshop, as, perhaps, the key issue related to oil production in the Appalachian region - the price of a barrel of oil. Project members sought solutions to production problems from a number of sources. In general, the Petroleum Technology Transfer Council (PTTC) website, both regional and national, proved to be a fertile source of information. Technical issues included water production, paraffin accumulation, production practices, EOR and waterflooding were addressed in a number of SPE papers. Articles on reservoir characterization were found in both the AAPG Bulletin and in SPE papers. Project members extracted topical and keyword information from pertinent articles and websites and combined them in a database that was placed on the PUMP website. Because of difficulties finding potential members with the qualifications, interests, and flexibility of schedule to allow a long-term commitment, it was decided to implement the PMP Regional Council as a subcommittee of the Producer Advisory Group (PAG) sponsored by Appalachian Region PTTC. The advantages of this decision are that the PAG is in already in existence as a volunteer group interested in problem identification and implementation of solutions and that PAG members are unpaid, so no outside funds will be required to sustain the group. The PUMP website became active in October of 2002. The site is designed to evolve; as new information becomes available, it can be readily added to the site or the site can be modified to accommodate it. The site is interactive allowing users to search within the PUMP site, within the Appalachian Region PTTC site, or within the whole internet through the input of user-supplied key words for information on oil production problems and solutions. Since its inception in the Fall of 2002, the PUMP site has experienced a growing number of users of increasingly diverse nature and from an increasing geographic area. This indicates that the site is reaching its target audience in the Appalachian region and beyond. Following up on a commitment to technology transfer, a tota

  19. DOE-HDBK-1114-98; Guide to Good Practices for Line and Training Manager Activities

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    4-98 June 1998 Superseding DOE-STD-1056-93 February 1993 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR LINE AND TRAINING MANAGER ACTIVITIES U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401.

  20. New Guidance Helps LM Manage Institutional Controls

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The official Guidance for Developing and Implementing Institutional Controls for Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance at DOE Legacy Management Sites, was issued in January as a supplemental...

  1. Certifying Industrial Energy Efficiency Performance: AligningManagement, Measurement, and Practice to Create Market Value

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    McKane, Aimee; Scheihing, Paul; Williams, Robert

    2007-07-01

    More than fifteen years after the launch of programs in theU.K. and U.S., industry still offers one of the largest opportunities forenergy savings worldwide. The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimatesthe savings potential from cost-optimization of industrial motor-drivensystems alone at 7 percent of global electricity use. The U.S. Departmentof Energy (USDOE) Industrial Technologies Program estimates 7 percentsavings potential in total US industrial energy use through theapplication of proven best practice. Simple paybacks for these types ofprojects are frequently two years or less. The technology required toachieve these savings is widely available; the technical skills requiredto identify energy saving opportunities are known and transferable.Although programs like USDOE's Best Practices have been highlysuccessful, most plants, as supported by 2002 MECS data, remain eitherunaware or unmotivated to improve their energy efficiency--as evidencedby the 98 percent of US industrial facilities reporting to MECS say thatthey lack a full-time energy manager. With the renewed interest in energyefficiency worldwide and the emergence of carbon trading and newfinancial instruments such as white certificates1, there is a need tointroduce greater transparency into the way that industrial facilitiesidentify, develop, and document energy efficiency projects. Historically,industrial energy efficiency projects have been developed by plantengineers, frequently with assistance from consultants and/or supplierswith highly specialized technical skills. Under this scenario,implementation of energy efficiency improvements is dependent onindividuals. These individuals typically include "champions" within anindustrial facility or corporation, working in cooperation withconsultants or suppliers who have substantial knowledge based on years ofexperience. This approach is not easily understood by others without thisspecialized technical knowledge, penetrates the market fairly slowly, andhas no assurance of persistence, since champions may leave the company orbe reassigned after project completion.This paper presents an alternatescenario that builds on the body of expert knowledge concerning energymanagement best practices and the experience of industrial champions toengage industry in continuous energy efficiency improvement at thefacility rather than the individual level. Under this scenario,standardized methodologies for applying and validating energy managementbest practices in industrial facilities will be developed through aconsensus process involving both plant personnel and specializedconsultants and suppliers. The resulting protocols will describe aprocess or framework for conducting an energy savings assessment andverifying the results that will be transparent to policymakers, managers,and the financial community, and validated by a third-party organization.Additionally, a global dialogue is being initiated by the United NationsIndustrial Development Organization (UNIDO) concerning the development ofan international industrial energy management standard that would be ISOcompatible. The proposed scenario will combine the resulting standardwith the best practice protocols for specific energy systems (i.e.,steam, process heating, compressed air, pumping systems, etc.) to formthe foundation of a third party, performance-based certification programfor the overall industrial facility that is compatible with existingmanagement systems, including ISO 9001:2000, 14001:2004 and 6 Sigma. Thelong term goal of this voluntary, industry designed certification programis to develop a transparent, globally accepted system for validatingenergy efficiency projects and management practices. This system wouldcreate a verified record of energy savings with potential market valuethat could be recognized among sectors and countries.

  2. Legacy: Proposed Penalty (2015-CE-14025)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that The Legacy Companies failed to certify refrigerator Maxx Ice-brand basic model MCR3U as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  3. DOE Announces Acquisition Strategy for Post Fiscal Year 2016 Legacy Cleanup

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    at Los Alamos | Department of Energy Announces Acquisition Strategy for Post Fiscal Year 2016 Legacy Cleanup at Los Alamos DOE Announces Acquisition Strategy for Post Fiscal Year 2016 Legacy Cleanup at Los Alamos October 2, 2015 - 2:30pm Addthis Media Contact Lynette Chafin, 513-246-0461, Lynette.Chafin@emcbc.doe.gov Cincinnati - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management Consolidated Business Center announced it intends to solicit by means of full and open competition for

  4. Water Efficiency Improvements At Various Environmental Protection Agency Sites: Best Management Practices Case Study #12 „ Laboratory/Medical Equipment (Brochure), Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) built a successful water conservation program and reduced potable water use through a series of initiatives at EPA laboratories. EPA completed projects in all of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Federal Energy Management Program's (FEMP) 14 Best Management Practice (BMP) categories. The projects highlighted below demonstrate EPA's ability to reduce water use in the laboratory/medical equipment BMP category by implementing vacuum pump and steam steril-

  5. Department of Energy to Continue Managing Uranium Leasing Program...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    at http:energy.govlmoffice-legacy-management, or on the DOE National Environmental Policy Act website at www.energy.govnepa. Addthis Related Articles DOE Evaluates...

  6. Updated Appendices to the Status of Environmental Management...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    the Reduction of Environmental Risks and Challenges Posed by the Legacy of the Cold War Report to Congress Updated Appendices to the Status of Environmental Management...

  7. IT Capital Planning Corporate Management Improvement Program (CMIP)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Corporate Management Improvement Program (CMIP) was initiated by the Department in recognition of the fact that corporate legacy systems that support administrative functions were nearing the...

  8. Effects of Intermediate Ethanol Blends on Legacy Vehicles and...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Intermediate Ethanol Blends on Legacy Vehicles and Small Non-Road Effects of Intermediate Ethanol Blends on Legacy Vehicles and Small Non-Road Engines, Report 1 Updated Feb 2009...

  9. Executing Legacy Clean-up at LANL | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Executing Legacy Clean-up at LANL Executing Legacy Clean-up at LANL Topic: DOE presented on the proposed new campaign approach to clean-up at Los Alamos National Laboratory, and ...

  10. Generating code adapted for interlinking legacy scalar code and extended

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    vector code (Patent) | SciTech Connect Generating code adapted for interlinking legacy scalar code and extended vector code Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Generating code adapted for interlinking legacy scalar code and extended vector code Mechanisms for intermixing code are provided. Source code is received for compilation using an extended Application Binary Interface (ABI) that extends a legacy ABI and uses a different register configuration than the legacy ABI. First compiled

  11. INDIANAPOLIS LEAVES A LEGACY OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    INDIANAPOLIS LEAVES A LEGACY OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY INDIANAPOLIS LEAVES A LEGACY OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY INDIANAPOLIS LEAVES A LEGACY OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY The City of Indianapolis, Indiana, used its status as host of the 2012 Super Bowl to address inefficiencies in the area's older housing stock and leave behind a legacy of energy efficiency. Seeking to overcome market barriers to residential and commercial energy upgrades and build upon the neighborhood improvement efforts that were part of its

  12. Overview of VMT Reduction and Legacy Fleet Improvement | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy VMT Reduction and Legacy Fleet Improvement Overview of VMT Reduction and Legacy Fleet Improvement 2012 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting PDF icon vss082_kalish_2012_o.pdf More Documents & Publications Legacy Fleet Improvements Thermoelectrics: The New Green Automotive Technology EPAct State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets

  13. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Fernald Environmental Management...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Act (CERCLA). As part of that agreement a comprehensive Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS) was conducted in and around Fernald to identify appropriate remedial...

  14. Updated Appendices to the Status of Environmental Management Initiatives to

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Accelerate the Reduction of Environmental Risks and Challenges Posed by the Legacy of the Cold War Report to Congress | Department of Energy Updated Appendices to the Status of Environmental Management Initiatives to Accelerate the Reduction of Environmental Risks and Challenges Posed by the Legacy of the Cold War Report to Congress Updated Appendices to the Status of Environmental Management Initiatives to Accelerate the Reduction of Environmental Risks and Challenges Posed by the Legacy of

  15. 2011-2015 Human Capital Management Plan

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Office of Legacy Management (LM) needs skilled and engaged staff to accomplish our mission and carry out our responsibilities to the American people. This Human Capital Management Plan (HCMP or...

  16. LM Releases Update of Site Management Guide

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    A new edition of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) Site Management Guide (SMG) was posted to the LM website, February 24, 2015.

  17. Best Practices Guide for Energy-Efficient Data Center Design: Revised March 2011, Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) (Brochure)

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Best Practices Guide for Energy-Efficient Data Center Design Revised March 2011 Prepared by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy; NREL is operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Acknowledgements | Contacts Acknowledgements This report was prepared by John Bruschi, Peter Rumsey, Robin Anliker, Larry Chu, and Stuart Gregson of Rumsey

  18. DOE-STD-1055-93; DOE Standard Guideline to Good Practices For Maintenance Management Involvement at DOE Nuclear Facilities

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1055-93 March 1993 DOE STANDARD GUIDELINE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT AT DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES U.S. Department of Energy AREA MNTY Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge,

  19. Overview of the Government of Canada Nuclear Legacy Liabilities Program - 13551

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Metcalfe, D.; McCauley, D.; Miller, J.; Brooks, S.

    2013-07-01

    Nuclear legacy liabilities have resulted from more than 60 years of nuclear research and development carried out on behalf of Canada. The liabilities are located at Atomic Energy of Canada Limited's (AECL) Chalk River Laboratories in Ontario and Whiteshell Laboratories in Manitoba, as well as three shutdown prototype reactors in Ontario and Quebec that are being maintained in a safe storage state. Estimated at about $7.4 billion (current day dollars), these liabilities consist of disused nuclear facilities and associated infrastructure, a wide variety of buried and stored waste, and contaminated lands. In 2006, the Government of Canada adopted a long-term strategy to deal with the nuclear legacy liabilities and initiated a five-year, $520 million start-up phase, thereby creating the Nuclear Legacy Liabilities Program (NLLP). The Government of Canada renewed the NLLP in 2011 with a $439-million three-year second phase that ends March 31, 2014. The projects and activities carried out under the Program focus on infrastructure decommissioning, environmental restoration, improving the management of legacy radioactive waste, and advancing the long-term strategy. The NLLP is being implemented through a Memorandum of Understanding between Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) and AECL whereby NRCan is responsible for policy direction and oversight, including control of funding, and AECL is responsible for implementing the program of work and holding and administering all licences, facilities and lands. (authors)

  20. Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems – Part II: Methodological guidance for a better practice

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Laurent, Alexis; Clavreul, Julie; Bernstad, Anna; Bakas, Ioannis; Niero, Monia; Gentil, Emmanuel; Christensen, Thomas H.; Hauschild, Michael Z.

    2014-03-01

    Highlights: • We perform a critical review of 222 LCA studies of solid waste management systems. • We analyse the past LCA practice against the ISO standard and ILCD Handbook guidance. • Malpractices exist in many methodological aspects with large variations among studies. • Many of these aspects are important for the reliability of the results. • We provide detailed recommendations to practitioners of waste management LCAs. - Abstract: Life cycle assessment (LCA) is increasingly used in waste management to identify strategies that prevent or minimise negative impacts on ecosystems, human health or natural resources. However, the quality of the provided support to decision- and policy-makers is strongly dependent on a proper conduct of the LCA. How has LCA been applied until now? Are there any inconsistencies in the past practice? To answer these questions, we draw on a critical review of 222 published LCA studies of solid waste management systems. We analyse the past practice against the ISO standard requirements and the ILCD Handbook guidelines for each major step within the goal definition, scope definition, inventory analysis, impact assessment, and interpretation phases of the methodology. Results show that malpractices exist in several aspects of the LCA with large differences across studies. Examples are a frequent neglect of the goal definition, a frequent lack of transparency and precision in the definition of the scope of the study, e.g. an unclear delimitation of the system boundaries, a truncated impact coverage, difficulties in capturing influential local specificities such as representative waste compositions into the inventory, and a frequent lack of essential sensitivity and uncertainty analyses. Many of these aspects are important for the reliability of the results. For each of them, we therefore provide detailed recommendations to practitioners of waste management LCAs.

  1. Effects of Intermediate Ethanol Blends on Legacy Vehicles and...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    117 Effects of Intermediate Ethanol Blends on Legacy Vehicles and Small Non-Road Engines, Report 1 - Updated February 2009 Prepared by Keith Knoll Brian West Wendy Clark...

  2. Lubricants - Pathway to Improving Fuel Efficiency of Legacy Fleet...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Lubricants - Pathway to Improving Fuel Efficiency of Legacy Fleet Vehicles Reviews recent studies on potential for low-viscosity lubricants and low-friction surfaces and additives ...

  3. Effects of Intermediate Ethanol Blends on Legacy Vehicles and Small

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Non-Road Engines, Report 1 … Updated Feb 2009 | Department of Energy Effects of Intermediate Ethanol Blends on Legacy Vehicles and Small Non-Road Engines, Report 1 … Updated Feb 2009 Effects of Intermediate Ethanol Blends on Legacy Vehicles and Small Non-Road Engines, Report 1 … Updated Feb 2009 Effects of Intermediate Ethanol Blends on Legacy Vehicles and Small Non-Road Effects of Intermediate Ethanol Blends on Legacy Vehicles and Small Non-Road Engines, Report 1 … Updated Feb 2009 PDF

  4. Repackaging Rocky Flats Legacy Transuranic Waste

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    McTaggart, Jerri Lynne

    2008-01-15

    Repackaging legacy Transuranic (TRU), Transuranic Mixed (TRM), Low Level Waste (LLW), and Low Level Mixed (LLM) waste requires good characterization skills and the ability to adapt to less than ideal conditions. Repackaging legacy waste in a facility that is not undergoing Decontamination and Decommission (D and D) is optimum. However, repackaging any waste in a D and D facility, under cold and dark conditions, can be difficult. Cold and dark conditions are when the heating and air conditioning are no longer in service and the lighting consists of strands of lights hung throughout each of the rooms. Working under these conditions adds an additional level of stress and danger that must be addressed. The use of glovebags was very useful at Rocky Flats during the D and D of many buildings. Glovebags can be adapted for many different types of wastes and unusual conditions. Repackaging of legacy TRU waste, in a D and D facility, can be accomplished safely and cost effectively with the use of glovebags. In conclusion: the use of glovebags to repackage legacy TRU, TRM, LLW, or LLM waste was done safely and cost effectively at Rocky Flats. The cost of using glovebags was minimal. Glovebags are easily adaptable to whatever the waste configuration is. The use of glovebags, for repackaging of Legacy waste, allows D and D efforts to stay on schedule and on task. Without the use of glovebags, additional gloveboxes would have been required at Rocky Flats. Larger items, such as the HEPA filters, would have required the construction of a new large item repackaging glovebox. Repackaging in glovebags allows the freedom to either locate the glovebag by the waste or locate the glovebag in a place that least impacts D and D efforts. The use of glovebags allowed numerous configurations of waste to be repackaged without the use of gloveboxes. During the D and D of the Rocky Flats facility, which was in a cold and dark stage, D and D work was not impacted by the repackaging activity. Glovebags work well in facilities that are in the process of D and D or still in full operations because glovebags are very safe and cost effective.

  5. DOE-HDBK-1203-97; Guide to Good Practices for Training of Technical Staff and Managers

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-HDBK-1203-97 January 1997 Supersedes DOE-STD-1008-92 July 1992 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR TRAINING OF TECHNICAL STAFF AND MANAGERS U.S. Department of Energy FSC 6910 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak

  6. DOE Handbook: Guide to good practices for training of technical staff and managers

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1997-01-01

    Training programs at DOE facilities should prepare personnel to safely and efficiently operate the facilities in accordance with DOE requirements. This guide contains information that can be used to develop or validate training programs for technical staff and managers at DOE nuclear facilities. Training programs based on the content of this guide should provide assurance that these personnel perform their jobs safely and competently.

  7. Management of high sulfur coal combustion residues, issues and practices: Proceedings

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Chugh, Y.P.; Beasley, G.A.

    1994-10-01

    Papers presented at the following sessions are included in this proceedings: (1) overview topic; (2) characterization of coal combustion residues; (3) environmental impacts of residues management; (4) materials handling and utilization, Part I; and (5) materials handling and utilization, Part II. Selected paper have been processed separately for inclusion in the Energy Science and Technology Database.

  8. REMOVAL OF LEGACY PLUTONIUM MATERIALS FROM SWEDEN

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Dunn, Kerry A.; Bellamy, J. Steve; Chandler, Greg T.; Iyer, Natraj C.; Koenig, Rich E.; Leduc, D.; Hackney, B.; Leduc, Dan R.

    2013-08-18

    U.S. Department of Energys National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Office of Global Threat Reduction (GTRI) recently removed legacy plutonium materials from Sweden in collaboration with AB SVAFO, Sweden. This paper details the activities undertaken through the U.S. receiving site (Savannah River Site (SRS)) to support the characterization, stabilization, packaging and removal of legacy plutonium materials from Sweden in 2012. This effort was undertaken as part of GTRIs Gap Materials Program and culminated with the successful removal of plutonium from Sweden as announced at the 2012 Nuclear Security Summit. The removal and shipment of plutonium materials to the United States was the first of its kind under NNSAs Global Threat Reduction Initiative. The Environmental Assessment for the U.S. receipt of gap plutonium material was approved in May 2010. Since then, the multi-year process yielded many first time accomplishments associated with plutonium packaging and transport activities including the application of the of DOE-STD-3013 stabilization requirements to treat plutonium materials outside the U.S., the development of an acceptance criteria for receipt of plutonium from a foreign country, the development and application of a versatile process flow sheet for the packaging of legacy plutonium materials, the identification of a plutonium container configuration, the first international certificate validation of the 9975 shipping package and the first intercontinental shipment using the 9975 shipping package. This paper will detail the technical considerations in developing the packaging process flow sheet, defining the key elements of the flow sheet and its implementation, determining the criteria used in the selection of the transport package, developing the technical basis for the package certificate amendment and the reviews with multiple licensing authorities and most importantly integrating the technical activities with the Swedish partners.

  9. Mitigating PQ Problems in Legacy Data Centers

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Ilinets, Boris; /SLAC

    2011-06-01

    The conclusions of this presentation are: (1) Problems with PQ in legacy data centers still exist and need to be mitigated; (2) Harmonics generated by non-linear IT load can be lowered by passive, active and hybrid cancellation methods; (3) Harmonic study is necessary to find the best way to treat PQ problems; (4) AHF's and harmonic cancellation transformers proved to be very efficient in mitigating PQ problems; and (5) It is important that IT leaders partner with electrical engineering to appropriate ROI statements, justifying many of these expenditures.

  10. Linking Legacies F2002-00544

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Linking Legacies F2002-00544 Fizeau. This 11-kiloton atmospheric nuclear explosion, code-named "Fizeau," was one of 210 atmospheric nuclear tests conducted by the United States. Of the 1,054 nuclear tests explosions conducted by the U.S., 904 were detonated at the Nevada Test Site. All U.S. nuclear explosions since 1962 have been underground. Event Fizeau, Operation Plumbbob, Yucca Flat, Nevada Test Site, Neuada. 9:45 A.M., September 14, 1957. Barrels of transuranic waste sit on a

  11. Best Practices | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Facilities Asset Management Best Practices A best practice is a specific process that works and creates ideas, options and insights for others. The following best practices ...

  12. Comparison of selected foreign plans and practices for spent fuel and high-level waste management

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Schneider, K.J.; Mitchell, S.J.; Lakey, L.T.; Johnson, A.B. Jr.; Hazelton, R.F.; Bradley, D.J.

    1990-04-01

    This report describes the major parameters for management of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive wastes in selected foreign countries as of December 1989 and compares them with those in the United States. The foreign countries included in this study are Belgium, Canada, France, the Federal Republic of Germany, Japan, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. All the countries are planning for disposal of spent fuel and/or high-level wastes in deep geologic repositories. Most countries (except Canada and Sweden) plan to reprocess their spent fuel and vitrify the resultant high-level liquid wastes; in comparison, the US plans direct disposal of spent fuel. The US is planning to use a container for spent fuel as the primary engineered barrier. The US has the most developed repository concept and has one of the earliest scheduled repository startup dates. The repository environment presently being considered in the US is unique, being located in tuff above the water table. The US also has the most prescriptive regulations and performance requirements for the repository system and its components. 135 refs., 8 tabs.

  13. A Shining Example of Dr. King's legacy | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    A Shining Example of Dr. King's legacy A Shining Example of Dr. King's legacy January 9, 2013 - 11:27am Addthis A Shining Example of Dr. King’s legacy Kathy Chambers Senior Science and Technical Information Specialist, OSTI Editor's Note: This blog was originally posted on OSTI's blog. As America celebrates Martin Luther King's birthday and focuses on how far this nation has come for all people, the Energy Department's .EDUconnections is pleased to honor Delaware State University (DSU). DSU

  14. Surgeons' Knowledge and Practices Regarding the Role of Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer Management

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Zhou, Jessica; Griffith, Kent A.; Hawley, Sarah T.; Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J.; Janz, Nancy K.; Sabel, Michael S.; Katz, Steven J.; Jagsi, Reshma

    2013-12-01

    Purpose: Population-based studies suggest underuse of radiation therapy, especially after mastectomy. Because radiation oncology is a referral-based specialty, knowledge and attitudes of upstream providers, specifically surgeons, may influence patients' decisions regarding radiation, including whether it is even considered. Therefore, we sought to evaluate surgeons' knowledge of pertinent risk information, their patterns of referral, and the correlates of surgeon knowledge and referral in specific breast cancer scenarios. Methods and Materials: We surveyed a national sample of 750 surgeons, with a 67% response rate. We analyzed responses from those who had seen at least 1 breast cancer patient in the past year (n=403), using logistic regression models to identify correlates of knowledge and appropriate referral. Results: Overall, 87% of respondents were general surgeons, and 64% saw >10 breast cancer patients in the previous year. In a scenario involving a 45-year-old undergoing lumpectomy, only 45% correctly estimated the risk of locoregional recurrence without radiation therapy, but 97% would refer to radiation oncology. In a patient with 2 of 20 nodes involved after mastectomy, 30% would neither refer to radiation oncology nor provide accurate information to make radiation decisions. In a patient with 4 of 20 nodes involved after mastectomy, 9% would not refer to radiation oncology. Fewer than half knew that the Oxford meta-analysis revealed a survival benefit from radiation therapy after lumpectomy (45%) or mastectomy (32%). Only 16% passed a 7-item knowledge test; female and more-experienced surgeons were more likely to pass. Factors significantly associated with appropriate referral to radiation oncology included breast cancer volume, tumor board participation, and knowledge. Conclusions: Many surgeons have inadequate knowledge regarding the role of radiation in breast cancer management, especially after mastectomy. Targeted educational interventions may improve the quality of care.

  15. INDIANAPOLIS LEAVES A LEGACY OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    INDIANAPOLIS LEAVES A LEGACY OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY The City of Indianapolis, Indiana, used its status as host of the 2012 Super Bowl to address inefficiencies in the area's older ...

  16. Generating code adapted for interlinking legacy scalar code and...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    code that uses the legacy ABI. The intermixed code comprises at least one call instruction that is one of a call from the first compiled code to the second compiled code or a...

  17. Legacy Clean-up Completion Project Overview | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Bob Pfaff provided the members with information regarding the status of the Fiscal Year 2016 Budget request. Information included in the presentation also covered strategic planning and the remaining workscope in the Los Alamos National Laboratory Legacy Clean-up Project. PDF icon FY'16 Overview - July 29, 2015 More Documents & Publications Executing Legacy Clean-up at LANL NNMCAB Board Minutes: July 29, 2015 Taos Department of Energy Accomplishments

  18. Mound Museum Volunteers: Preserving a Laboratory's Legacy | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Mound Museum Volunteers: Preserving a Laboratory's Legacy Mound Museum Volunteers: Preserving a Laboratory's Legacy April 17, 2013 - 11:39am Addthis Ray Seiler, Mound Science and Energy Museum President, is one of the many museum volunteers who routinely talks to visitors, such as this group from Iowa who are interested in the history of the Mound site. Ray Seiler, Mound Science and Energy Museum President, is one of the many museum volunteers who routinely talks to visitors, such as

  19. Standing by Ohio: Cleaning Up our Environmental Legacy | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Standing by Ohio: Cleaning Up our Environmental Legacy Standing by Ohio: Cleaning Up our Environmental Legacy September 14, 2010 - 12:46pm Addthis Deputy Secretary Daniel Poneman observes instrumentation in the X-333 Process Building Control Room during his visit to the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant. | DOE photo Deputy Secretary Daniel Poneman observes instrumentation in the X-333 Process Building Control Room during his visit to the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant. | DOE

  20. Environmental Remediation program completes legacy mercury cleanup near

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Smith's Marketplace Stories » Legacy slope-side cleanup Environmental Remediation program completes legacy mercury cleanup near Smith's Marketplace Los Alamos National Laboratory performed a high-angle canyon-side cleanup on U.S. Department of Energy property just south of Smith's Marketplace. May 1, 2015 A telescoping crane hoists a spider excavator over Los Alamos Canyon before placing it on the canyon slope to excavate historically contaminated soil. In ongoing efforts to reduce the

  1. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Hoe Creek Underground Coal...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Hoe Creek Underground Coal Gasification Site - 045 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Hoe Creek Underground Coal Gasification Site (045) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: ...

  2. AUDIT REPORT Legacy Management Activities at Selected Closure...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    public information center that would house records and displays about the site's history, the environmental remediation, and ecological restoration activities. The...

  3. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Battelle Columbus Laboratories...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Columbus Laboratories W Jefferson Plutonium Facilities - OH 15 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Battelle Columbus Laboratories W Jefferson Plutonium Facilities (OH.15) Designated...

  4. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Penn Salt Manufacturing...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Salt Manufacturing Co Whitemarsh Research Laboratories - PA 20 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: PENN SALT MANUFACTURING CO., WHITEMARSH RESEARCH LABORATORIES (PA.20) Eliminated from...

  5. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Titanium Alloys Manufacturing...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Alloys Manufacturing Co Div of National Lead of Ohio - NY 41 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: TITANIUM ALLOYS MANUFACTURING CO., DIV. OF NATIONAL LEAD OF OHIO (NY.41) Eliminated from...

  6. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Carnegie Institute of Washington...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Carnegie Institute of Washington Dept of Genetics - NY 0-07 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Carnegie Institute of Washington (Dept. of Genetics) (NY.0-07 ) Eliminated from...

  7. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- International Minerals and...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    field for the recovery of uranium and other saleable products and also conducted experimental investigations to recover uranium from phosphates. FL.02-3 FL.02-4 Site...

  8. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- University of California...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Final DOE Areas Feasibility Study Appendices FINAL DOE AREAS FEASIBILITY STUDY for the: LABORATORY FOR ENERGY-RELATED HEALTH RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS Annual Site ...

  9. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Sandia National Laboratories...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    from a wide variety of historical activities. The National Nuclear Security Administration is the site landlord and will be responsible for Long Term Stewardship. Also see...

  10. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Sylvania Corning Nuclear...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Nuclear Corp Inc Sylvania Laboratories - NY 07 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: SYLVANIA CORNING NUCLEAR CORP., INC., SYLVANIA LABORATORIES (NY.07) Eliminated from consideration under ...

  11. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- International Minerals and...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    (The Former International Minerals and Chemical Corporation) Bartow, Florida; November 26, 1985 FL.03-4 - Memorandum; McKereghan to Campbell; ERDA (AEC) Inspection; April 11, 1977...

  12. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Billings Hospital - Small...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    of Chicago , Chicago , Illinois IL.01-1 Evaluation Year: 1979 IL.01-1 Site Operations: Nature of operations is not clear. Portions of Billings Hospital were reported to have been...

  13. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- St Louis Airport Site Vicinity...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: St. Louis Airport Site Vicinity Properties (017) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition:...

  14. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Idaho National Engineering...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Facility, a full-scale low-power version of the Advanced Test Reactor designed to provide physics data, and the Neutron Radiography Reactor at Argonne National Laboratory-West. ...

  15. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Case School of Applied Science...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Case School of Applied Science Ohio State University - OH 0-01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Case School of Applied Science, Ohio State University (OH.0-01 ) Eliminated from...

  16. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Inhalation Toxicology Research...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    monitoring and surveillance which is expected to continue until 2006. The Office of Science is site landlord and will be responsible for Long Term Stewardship. Also see...

  17. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- El_Verde

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    16, 2015 Other Documents Regulatory Status of Study Area 4 July 10, 2008 Amendment of NRC Materials License November 16, 2005 Amendment of NRC Materials License September 12,...

  18. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Hunter Douglas Aluminum...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    tubing during the late 1950s. CA.11-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No Authority - NRC licensed CA.11-2 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials...

  19. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Ohio State University Metallurgic...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    EXPERIMENT STATION (OH.0-05 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP - Referred to NRC Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Columbus , Ohio...

  20. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Tocco Induction Heating...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Tocco Induction Heating Div of Ohio Crankshaft Co - OH 42 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: TOCCO INDUCTION HEATING, DIV. OF OHIO CRANKSHAFT CO. (OH.42 ) Eliminated from consideration...

  1. Maintenance at DOE Legacy Management Sites Weldon Spring...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... be the most effective means of preserving ICs knowledge. ... in maintaining ICs by informing LM of site conditions and ... risk to construction workers accessing the buried ...

  2. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Westinghouse Advanced Reactors...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Decommissioning of the Westinghouse Nuclear Fuel Facility at Cheswick, PA, 2 Volumes; June 1984 PA.10-4 - Aerospace Corporation Letter; Young to Wallo (DOE); Subject: Status of ...

  3. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Brookhaven National Laboratory...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Brookhaven National Laboratory Buildings 353 354 467 and 468 - NY 14 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Brookhaven National Laboratory Buildings 353 354 467 and 468 (NY.14 ) Designated...

  4. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Middlesex Sampling Plant...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    7, 1984 NJ.04-4 - NLO Report (NLCO-733); The History of the Middlesex Sampling Plant; February, 1958 NJ.04-5 - AEC Memorandum; Consiglio to Gustavson; Transfer of Middlesex...

  5. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Fernald Reports ASER

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Reports ASER Fernald Preserve, Ohio Fernald Annual Site Environmental Reports 2014 Site Environmental Report 2014Cover 2014 Site Environmental Report Appendixes Appendix A: Supplemental Groundwater Information Appendix A Sub-attachments Appendix B: Supplemental Surface Water, Treated Effluent, and Sediment Information Appendix C: Supplemental Air Information Appendix D: Ecological Restoration Monitoring 2013 Site Environmental Report 2013Cover 2013 Site Environmental Report Appendixes Appendix

  6. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    March 12, 2013 Inspector SM Stoller, Ohio EPA, ODH Area Former Production Area and Waste Pits Area Sub-Area Type of Finding Follow Up No. Location (Use Map Whenever Possible) GPS? Unauthorized Use Disturbance Vegetation Other Description Photo? (File No.) Corrected Maintenance Req'd Cont. Observation 1 North of Bio-wetland NO X Concrete debris X 2 North of Bio-wetland NO X Asphalt debris X 3 North of Bio-wetland NO X Concrete debris X 4 A4B NO X Concrete debris X 5 Main drainage corridor NO X

  7. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    1 02/09/2010 Fernald Preserve Field Walkdown Inspection Date September 4, 2013 Inspector SM Stoller, Ohio EPA Area Lodge Pond basin, east field, east perimeter, WM1 wetlands, north pines Sub-Area Type of Finding Follow Up No. Location (Use Map Whenever Possible) GPS? Unauthorized Use Disturbance Vegetation Other Description Photo? (File No.) Corrected Maintenance Req'd Cont. Observation 1 East perimeter across from Cell 7 NO X Poison ivy X 2 East of Restoration shed NO X Vines growing up deer

  8. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- University of California...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Subject: List of California Sites; May 17, 1989 CA.05-3 - AEC Memorandum; Ball to Smith; Subject: 500 Pounds UO3 - SR-1952; July 10, 1951 CA.05-4 - AEC Memorandum; Blatzs to ...

  9. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- University of Arizona Southwest...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    of the University of Arizona under FUSRAP; October 13, 1987 AZ.01-4 - DOE Letter; Bauer to Liverman; Past Operations and a Survey by Messrs, Jascewsky, and Smith; February 7, 1978

  10. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Shiprock AEC Ore Buying...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    The history of domestic uranium procurement under U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) contracts identifies a number of ore buying stations (sampling and storage sites) that were ...

  11. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Moab AEC Ore Buying Station...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    The history of domestic uranium procurement under U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) contracts identifies a number of ore buying stations (sampling and storage sites) that were ...

  12. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Grants AEC Ore Buying Station...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    The history of domestic uranium procurement under U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) contracts identifies a number of ore buying stations (sampling and storage sites) that were ...

  13. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Shirley Basin AEC Ore Buying...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    The history of domestic uranium procurement under U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) contracts identifies a number of ore buying stations (sampling and storage sites) that were ...

  14. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Tuba City AEC Ore Buying...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    The history of domestic uranium procurement under U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) contracts identifies a number of ore buying stations (sampling and storage sites) that were ...

  15. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Monticello AEC Ore Buying...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    The history of domestic uranium procurement under U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) contracts identifies a number of ore buying stations (sampling and storage sites) that were ...

  16. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Blue Water AEC Ore Buying...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    The history of domestic uranium procurement under U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) contracts identifies a number of ore buying stations (sampling and storage sites) that were ...

  17. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Falls City Uranium Ore Stockpile...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    The history of domestic uranium procurement under U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) contracts identifies a number of ore buying stations (sampling and storage sites) that were ...

  18. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Mexican Hat AEC Ore Buying...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    The history of domestic uranium procurement under U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) contracts identifies a number of ore buying stations (sampling and storage sites) that were ...

  19. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Globe Cutter AEC Ore Buying...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    The history of domestic uranium procurement under U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) contracts identifies a number of ore buying stations (sampling and storage sites) that were ...

  20. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Fort St Vrain - 011

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    is located in Weld County, Colorado. In 1965, the U.S. Atomic Energy (a predecessor agency to DOE) agreed to provide permanent storage for a large portion of the Fort St. ...

  1. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Marysville AEC Ore Buying...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    The history of domestic uranium procurement under U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) contracts identifies a number of ore buying stations (sampling and storage sites) that were ...

  2. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Crooks Gap AEC Ore Buying...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    The history of domestic uranium procurement under U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) contracts identifies a number of ore buying stations (sampling and storage sites) that were ...

  3. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Riverton AEC Ore Buying...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    The history of domestic uranium procurement under U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) contracts identifies a number of ore buying stations (sampling and storage sites) that were ...

  4. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- White Canyon AEC Ore Buying...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    The history of domestic uranium procurement under U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) contracts identifies a number of ore buying stations (sampling and storage sites) that were ...

  5. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Iowa Army Ammunition Plant...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Historical Operations: Assembled nuclear weapons, primarily high explosive components and conducted explosives testing using the high explosive components and depleted uranium. ...

  6. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Waste Isolation Pilot Plant...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    is the worlds first underground repository licensed to safely and permanently dispose of transuranic radioactive waste left from the research and production of nuclear weapons. ...

  7. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- TA-1 Manhattan Laboratory...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Technical Area LASL LANL NM.11-1 NM.11-2 NM.11-3 Location: Los Alamos , New Mexico NM.11-3 Evaluation Year: 1985 NM.11-1 Site Operations: Nuclear weapons research and development. ...

  8. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Sandia National Laboratories...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Sandia National Laboratories-California was established in 1956 to conduct research and development in the interest of national security, with principal emphasis on nuclear weapons ...

  9. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Fairmont Chemical Co - NJ...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Fairmont Chemical Co - NJ 25 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Fairmont Chemical Co. (NJ.25 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name:...

  10. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Blockson Chemical Co - IL...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Blockson Chemical Co - IL 07 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Blockson Chemical Co. (IL.07) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP - Referred to US EPA Region V and the State of...

  11. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Estes Gulch Disposal Cell - 010

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Estes Gulch Disposal Cell - 010 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Estes Gulch Disposal Cell (010) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: All of the uranium mill tailings and other residual radioactive materials from the Old and New Rifle sites were disposed of in this dedicated disposal cell. The Department of Energy's Grand Junction

  12. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Etna Machine Co - OH 28

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Etna Machine Co - OH 28 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Etna Machine Co. (OH.28 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 3400 Maplewood Avenue , Toledo , Ohio OH.28-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 OH.28-1 Site Operations: Conducted swaging experiment to reduce the diameter of a hot-rolled uranium metal rod Research/Development and Testing on Uranium Metal in December 1950 (lasted only two days). OH.28-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated

  13. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Exxon Ray Point Site - 032

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Exxon Ray Point Site - 032 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Exxon Ray Point Site (032) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: This site is a Uranium Mill Tailings Rmedial Action (UMTRA) title II site located in Texas. UMTRA Title II sites are privately owned and operated sites that were active when the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation

  14. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Fansteel Metallurgical Corp - IL 16

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Fansteel Metallurgical Corp - IL 16 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Fansteel Metallurgical Corp. (IL.16 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Chicago , Illinois IL.16-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 IL.16-3 Site Operations: Sole producer and supplier of tantalum and columbium metals to the MED. IL.16-1 IL.16-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No radioactive materials handled at this site IL.16-2 IL.16-3 Radioactive Materials

  15. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Fenn Machinery Co - CT 11

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Fenn Machinery Co - CT 11 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Fenn Machinery Co. (CT.11 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: New Britain , Connecticut CT.11-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 CT.11-1 Site Operations: Performed short-term tests on small quantities of uranium metal to explore potential for swaging, circa mid-1950 CT.11-1 CT.11-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination considered remote due to limited scope of

  16. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Fenwal Inc - MA 14

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Fenwal Inc - MA 14 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Fenwal, Inc. (MA.14 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Ashland , Massachusetts MA.14-1 Evaluation Year: 1994 MA.14-2 MA.14-3 Site Operations: Performed pilot scale explosion suppression tests on uranium contaminated magnesium fluoride powder in the late 1960s. MA.14-1 MA.14-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination considered remote based on the limited

  17. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    - 016 Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory - 016 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (016) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: This site began it's mission as a single-program research and development facility for the Atomic Energy Commission in 1972, when the first accelerator at the Laboratory

  18. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Foote Mineral Co - PA 27

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Foote Mineral Co - PA 27 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Foote Mineral Co. (PA.27 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Exton , Pennsylvania PA.27-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 PA.27-1 Site Operations: Processed rare earth, principally zirconium and monazite sand was processed on a pilot-plant scale. PA.27-2 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Limited quantity of material handled - Potential for contamination considered remote

  19. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Frankford Arsenal - PA 21

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Frankford Arsenal - PA 21 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Frankford Arsenal (PA.21 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP - Referred to DOD Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Pitman -Dunn Laboratories Dept. , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania PA.21-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 PA.21-2 Site Operations: Conducted research involving the use of uranium tetrachloride and metal fabrication operations with uranium metal. PA.21-2 PA.21-4 PA.21-5 Site Disposition: Eliminated

  20. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Gardinier Inc - FL 05

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Gardinier Inc - FL 05 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: GARDINIER, INC. ( FL.05 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP - Referred to EPA and State of Florida Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: U. S. Phosphoric Products FL.05-1 Location: Tampa , Florida FL.05-2 Evaluation Year: 1984 FL.05-3 Site Operations: U. S. Phosphoric Products constructed and operated a small scale pilot plant for uranium recovery; and Gardinier investigated a process for the recovery of by-product uranium

  1. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- General Electric Co - Shelbyville - IN

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    07 Shelbyville - IN 07 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: General Electric Co - Shelbyville (IN.07 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: General Electric Plant IN.07-1 Location: Shelbyville , Indiana IN.07-1 Evaluation Year: 1994 IN.07-2 Site Operations: Compacted approximately 500 pounds of thorium (small pieces) into electrodes on 25 and 26 June, 1956. IN.07-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination considered remote due

  2. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Geothermal Test Facility - 001

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Geothermal Test Facility - 001 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Geothermal Test Facility (001) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: This facility is an inactive Department of Energy geothermal research facility. The Department of Energy's Oakland Operations Office completed clean-up activities in Fiscal Year 1997 and the area has been

  3. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Gleason Works - NY 55

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Gleason Works - NY 55 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: GLEASON WORKS (NY.55 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Rochester , New York NY.55-1 Evaluation Year: 1994 NY.55-2 Site Operations: Metal fabrication operations - Rolled uranium metal. NY.55-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination considered remote NY.55-2 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Uranium NY.55-1

  4. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Gruen Watch Co - OH 37

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Gruen Watch Co - OH 37 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: GRUEN WATCH CO. (OH.37 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Cincinnati , Ohio OH.37-1 Evaluation Year: 1991 OH.37-2 OH.37-3 Site Operations: Stamped washers from strips of uranium in the mid-1950s. OH.37-1 OH.37-4 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination considered remote based on limited quantities of material handled OH.37-2 Radioactive Materials

  5. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Guterl Specialty Steel - NY 12

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Guterl Specialty Steel - NY 12 FUSRAP Considered Sites Guterl Specialty Steel, NY Alternate Name(s): Simonds Saw and Steel Co. Guterl Steel Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp. NY.12-1 NY.12-2 Location: Ohio Street and Route 95, Lockport, New York NY.12-12 Historical Operations: Performed rolling mill operations on natural uranium and thorium metal. NY.12-6 NY.12-7 Eligibility Determination: NY.12-11 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Surveys NY.12-1 NY.12-4 NY.12-8 NY.12-9 NY.12-12 Site Status: Cleanup

  6. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Hanford Engineer Works - WA 01

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Hanford Engineer Works - WA 01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Hanford Engineer Works (WA.01 ) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see http://www.hanford.gov/ Documents Related to Hanford Engineer Works

  7. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Harshaw Chemical Co - OH 04

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Harshaw Chemical Co - OH 04 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Harshaw Chemical Company, OH (OH.04 ) Cleanup in progress by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Filtrol Partners, Uranium Refinery Location: 1000 Harvard Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio OH.04-1 Evaluation Year: 1984 OH.04-1 Site Operations: Produced uranium compounds and other chemical compounds under MED and AEC contracts. OH.04-3 OH.04-4 Site Disposition: OH.04-5 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes

  8. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Harvard University Electron

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Accelerator - MA 05 Harvard University Electron Accelerator - MA 05 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Harvard University Electron Accelerator (MA.05 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Cambridge , Massachusetts MA.05-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 MA.05-1 Site Operations: Facility performed research in support of AEC and MED utilizing small quantities of radioactive materials in a controlled environment. MA.05-1 Site

  9. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Heald Machine Co - MA 15

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Heald Machine Co - MA 15 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Heald Machine Co. (MA.15) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Worcester , Massachusetts MA.15-1 Evaluation Year: 1994 MA.15-2 MA.15-3 Site Operations: Research and development on uranium slug drilling machines in the early 1960s. MA.15-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination considered remote based on the limited quantity of materials handled MA.15-2

  10. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Heavy Minerals Inc - IL 14

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Heavy Minerals Inc - IL 14 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Heavy Minerals, Inc. ( IL.14 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: W.R. Grace Company IL.14-1 Location: 836 South Michigan Avenue , Chicago , Illinois IL.14-2 Evaluation Year: 1990 IL.14-1 Site Operations: Submitted a proposal to supply thorium hydroxide to the AEC; no indication that the bid was accepted. IL.14-2 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No indication of work done with

  11. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Hecla Durita Site - 012

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Hecla Durita Site - 012 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Hecla Durita Site (012 ) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: The Hecla site is a Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title II site located in Durita, Colorado. UMTRCA Title II sites are privately owned and operated sites that were active when the Uranium Mill

  12. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Heppanstall Co - PA 19

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Heppanstall Co - PA 19 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Heppanstall Co. (PA.19 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Tippens Inc. PA.19-1 Location: 4620 Hatfield Street , Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania PA.19-4 Evaluation Year: 1987 PA.19-2 Site Operations: Forged approximately 100,000 pounds of uranium during a six month period in 1955. PA.19-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination remote. Radiological screening survey

  13. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Heyden Chemical Corp - NJ 19

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Heyden Chemical Corp - NJ 19 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Heyden Chemical Corp. (NJ.19 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: American Cyanamid NJ.19-2 Location: Princeton , New Jersey NJ.19-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NJ.19-1 Site Operations: Commercial chemical operation. AEC was interested in their process for keeping thorium oxide in suspension. No indication of AEC contractual relationship with Heyden. NJ.19-1 NJ.19-3 Site Disposition:

  14. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Hoe Creek Underground Coal

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Gasification Site - 045 Hoe Creek Underground Coal Gasification Site - 045 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Hoe Creek Underground Coal Gasification Site (045) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: The Hoe Creek Underground Gasification site occupies 80 acres of land located in Campbell County, Wyoming. The site was used to

  15. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Hooker Chemical Co - NY 05

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Hooker Chemical Co - NY 05 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Hooker Chemical Co. (NY.05) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Occidental Chemical Corporation Hooker Electrochemical Corporation NY.05-1 NY.05-2 Location: Niagara Falls , New York NY.05-3 Evaluation Year: 1985 NY.05-1 NY.05-2 Site Operations: Design, engineering, construction, equipping and operation of a plant for the manufacture of Product 45 (xylene hexachloride); MFL (Miller's

  16. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Horizons Inc - OH 05

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Horizons Inc - OH 05 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: HORIZONS, INC. (OH.05 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Clecon, Inc. Lamotite, Inc. OH.05-1 OH.05-1 Location: 2909 East 79th Street , Cleveland , Ohio OH.05-2 OH.05-3 Evaluation Year: 1985 OH.05-1 Site Operations: Conducted research development work on a process for preparation of zirconium by fused salt electrolysis; and conducted work on production of thorium metal by fused salt

  17. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Humphreys Gold Co - FL 08

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Humphreys Gold Co - FL 08 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Humphreys Gold Co. (FL.08 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Jacksonville , Florida FL.08-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 FL.08-2 FL.08-3 Site Operations: Processed monazite ore in the 1950s. FL.08-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No Authority - No AEC involvement at the site FL.08-2 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Thorium FL.08-1

  18. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Idaho National Engineering and

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Environmental Laboratory - 015 Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory - 015 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (015) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: In operation since 1949, the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) is a Department

  19. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Inhalation Toxicology Research

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Institute - 020 Inhalation Toxicology Research Institute - 020 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Inhalation Toxicology Research Institute (020) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: This facility is owned by the Department of Energy and is located on land the U. S. Air Force leases to the Department of Energy. The Department of Energy

  20. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- International Minerals and Chemical

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Corp - Pilot Plant - FL 02 and Chemical Corp - Pilot Plant - FL 02 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: International Minerals and Chemical Corp - Pilot Plant (FL.02) Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Mulberry , Florida FL.02-1 Evaluation Year: 1985 FL.02-2 Site Operations: Erected and operated a pilot plant to process material from the leached zone of the Florida pebble phosphate field for the recovery of uranium and other saleable products and also conducted

  1. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- International Minerals and Chemicals

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Corp - Bonnie Mill Plant - FL 03 and Chemicals Corp - Bonnie Mill Plant - FL 03 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: International Minerals and Chemicals Corp., Bonnie Mill Plant (FL.03) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: CF Industries Bonnie Uranium Plant FL.03-2 Location: Approximately 2 miles south of Highway 60 between Mulberry and Bartow , Bartow , Florida FL.03-2 Evaluation Year: 1985 FL.03-2 Site Operations: Recovered uranium

  2. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- International Nickel Co - Bayonne

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Laboratories - NJ 17 Nickel Co - Bayonne Laboratories - NJ 17 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: International Nickel Co., Bayonne Laboratories (NJ.17 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Bayonne , New Jersey NJ.17-1 Evaluation Year: 1994 NJ.17-1 Site Operations: Conducted research on the nickel plating of uranium metal. NJ.17-2 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination considered remote due to limited scope

  3. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- International Rare Metals Refinery Inc

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    - NY 38 Rare Metals Refinery Inc - NY 38 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: International Rare Metals Refinery, Inc. (NY.38 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Canadian Radium and Uranium Corporation NY.38-1 Location: 69 Kisko Avenue , Mt. Kisko , New York NY.38-1 NY.38-3 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.38-4 Site Operations: Manufactured and distributed radium and polonium products. NY.38-5 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No Authority - Site was a

  4. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- International Register - IL 15

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Register - IL 15 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: International Register (IL.15 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Spring Grove , Illinois IL.15-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 IL.15-3 Site Operations: Limited testing of centerless grinding techniques for uranium metal for the AEC. IL.15-2 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination considered remote based on limited operations and quantities of materials

  5. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Iowa State University Ames Laboratory

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    - IA 01 State University Ames Laboratory - IA 01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Iowa State University Ames Laboratory (IA.01 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Wallace Road , Ames , Iowa IA.01-1 IA.01-2 Evaluation Year: Circa 1985 IA.01-3 Site Operations: Produced uranium and thorium metal, recovered uranium scrap, and conducted studies and experimental investigations in connection with chemistry and metallurgy

  6. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Jessop Steel Co - PA 17

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Jessop Steel Co - PA 17 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: JESSOP STEEL CO. (PA.17 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 500 Green Street , Washington , Pennsylvania PA.17-3 Evaluation Year: 1991 PA.17-1 Site Operations: Metal fabrication for the AEC in the early 1950s. PA.17-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Limited quantities of radioactive material handled on site - Potential for residual radioactive contamination is

  7. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Johns Hopkins University - MD 02

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Johns Hopkins University - MD 02 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY (MD.02 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Baltimore , Maryland MD.02-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 MD.02-2 Site Operations: Conducted spectroscopic studies under contract number AT(49-1)-309. MD.02-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination considered remote based on limited quantities of material used in a controlled

  8. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Kaiser Aluminum Corp - IL 19

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Kaiser Aluminum Corp - IL 19 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: KAISER ALUMINUM CORP. (IL.19 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Dolton , Illinois IL.19-2 Evaluation Year: 1987 IL.19-2 Site Operations: Performed limited duration work extruding uranium billets into three CP-5 fuel elements, circa 1959. IL.19-2 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination considered remote due to limited scope of activities

  9. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Kankakee Ordnance Plant - IL 32

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Kankakee Ordnance Plant - IL 32 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: KANKAKEE ORDNANCE PLANT (IL.32 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Kankakee , Illinois IL.32-1 Evaluation Year: 1991 IL.32-1 Site Operations: Kankakee Ordnance Plant was cited as a possible location for the disposal of radioactive waste material. There is no indication that any radioactive waste was brought to Kankakee. IL.32-1 IL.32-2 Site Disposition:

  10. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Kennecott Sweetwater Site - 041

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Kennecott Sweetwater Site - 041 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Kennecott Sweetwater Site (041) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: The Kennecott Sweetwater site is a Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Title II site located in Sweetwater County, Wyoming. UMTRA Title II sites are privately owned and operated sites that were

  11. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Kerr McGee - 028

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Kerr McGee - 028 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Kerr McGee (028) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: The Kerr McGee plant in Guthrie Oklahoma processed unirradiated uranium scrap for the Atomic Energy Commission, recovering enriched uranium from it for use in the weapons complex. This work occurred during the 1960s. Also see

  12. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Knoxville Iron Co - TN 07

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Knoxville Iron Co - TN 07 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: KNOXVILLE IRON CO. (TN.07 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Knoxville , Tennessee TN.07-1 Evaluation Year: 1994 TN.07-2 TN.07-3 Site Operations: Melted uranium contaminated scrap metal in order to test industrial hygiene procedures in the mid-1950s. TN.07-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - AEC license TN.07-2 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive

  13. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Koppers Co Inc - PA 25

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Koppers Co Inc - PA 25 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: KOPPERS CO., INC. (PA.25 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania PA.25-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 PA.25-2 Site Operations: Conducted pilot-scale studies on the commercial production of UF4 and UF6. PA.25-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No Authority - Facility was licensed to handle nuclear materials PA.25-2 PA.25-3 Radioactive Materials Handled:

  14. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- LASL Tract OO - NM 06

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Tract OO - NM 06 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: LASL TRACT OO (NM.06 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP - Site was released by the AEC for sale and unrestricted use in 1976 Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Los Alamos , New Mexico NM.06-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NM.06-1 Site Operations: Site consists of an area of 3.85 acres on the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory compound. This tract of land was a location for a fire alarm equipment building and part of power

  15. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Latty Avenue Site - MO 04

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Latty Avenue Site - MO 04 FUSRAP Considered Sites Latty Avenue Site, MO Alternate Name(s): Futura Coatings Futura Chemical Company Facility Hazelwood Interim Storage Site (HISS) Former Cotter Site, Latty Avenue Properties Contemporary Metals Corp. Continental Mining and Milling MO.04-1 MO.04-2 MO.04-5 MO.04-6 MO.06-8 MO.06-11 Location: 9200 Latty Avenue, Hazelwood, Missouri MO.04-1 Historical Operations: Received, stored, and processed uranium residues for the AEC. Storage and processing were

  16. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    - 003 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory - 003 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (003) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Since the early 1930's the University of California has leased the Laboratory to the Department of Energy for a wide range of energy related research activities. The

  17. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Ledoux and Co - NY 37

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Ledoux and Co - NY 37 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: LEDOUX AND CO. (NY.37 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 155 Avenue of the Americas , New York , New York NY.37-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.37-1 Site Operations: Prime contractor to AEC, African Metals. LeDoux handled radioactive materials under this contract at other locations; records indicate that radioactive materials were not sent to the New York office.

  18. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Liberty Aircraft Manufacturing Company

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    - 025 Liberty Aircraft Manufacturing Company - 025 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Liberty Aircraft Manufacturing Company (025) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: This company was listed in the Sites Database, however, it is not a considered site for FUSRAP, nor could any information be found to indicate that it had any

  19. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Lodge and Shipley - OH 24

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Lodge and Shipley - OH 24 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: LODGE AND SHIPLEY (OH.24 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Cincinnati , Ohio OH.24-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 OH.24-1 Site Operations: Research, Development and Testing involving small quantities of Uranium metal(property of the AEC). OH.24-1 OH.24-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Limited scope of activities performed - Potential for residual radioactive

  20. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Loma Mill - CO 03

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Loma Mill - CO 03 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Loma Mill (CO.03 ) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: This site is one of a group of 77 FUSRAP considered sites for which few, if any records are available in their respective site files to provide an historical account of past operations and their relationship, if any, with MED/AEC

  1. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Lost Creek - WY 01

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Lost Creek - WY 01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Lost Creek (WY.01 ) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: This site is one of a group of 77 FUSRAP considered sites for which few, if any records are available in their respective site files to provide an historical account of past operations and their relationship, if any, with MED/AEC

  2. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Love Canal - NY 24

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Love Canal - NY 24 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: LOVE CANAL (NY.24 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None NY.24-1 Location: Region running from Old Military Road from the 16-acre rectangular piece of land in the southeast corner of Niagara Falls into the Township of Lewiston , Niagara Falls , New York NY.24-3 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.24-1 Site Operations: Chemical storage and disposal. NY.24-1 NY.24-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No

  3. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Lowman Mill Site - ID 01

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Lowman Mill Site - ID 01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Lowman Mill Site (ID.01) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see Lowman, Idaho, Disposal Site Documents Related to Lowman Mill Site

  4. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Luckey OH - OH 18

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Luckey OH - OH 18 FUSRAP Considered Sites Luckey, OH Alternate Name(s): Brush Beryllium Company - Luckey Beryllium Production Facility Diamond Magnesium Company Brush Wellman Motor Wheel Corporation Site OH.18-4 OH.18-5 OH.18-6 Location: 21200 Luckey Road, Luckey, Ohio OH.18-5 Historical Operations: Purification, fabrication, and production of beryllium material and products. Conducted studies and other work with beryllium, zirconium, and thorium. OH.18-4 OH.18-7 OH.18-8 OH.18-9 OH.18-10

  5. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Manufacturing Laboratories Inc - MA

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    0-04 Manufacturing Laboratories Inc - MA 0-04 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: MANUFACTURING LABORATORIES, INC. (MA.0-04 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 272 Northampton Street , Boston , Massachusetts MA.0-04-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 MA.0-04-3 Site Operations: Developed a process for making projectiles from depleted uranium during the early 1950s. MA.0-04-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for

  6. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Marion Engineer Depot - OH 45

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Engineer Depot - OH 45 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: MARION ENGINEER DEPOT (OH.45) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: South of Harding Highway (Route 309) at County Route 98, Marion County , Marion , Ohio OH.45-2 Evaluation Year: 1990 OH.45-2 Site Operations: The Engineer Depot was built in 1942 - at one time was the largest warehousing facilities of its kind in the U.S. AEC New York Operations Office provided radiation

  7. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Marion Mill Site - CO 09

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Mill Site - CO 09 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: MARION MILL SITE (CO.09 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP - deferred to the State of Colorado for appropriate action. Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Sugar Leaf Road , Boulder , Colorado CO.09-1 Evaluation Year: Circa 1983 CO.09-1 Site Operations: Milled and processed thorite and other rare earth ores in 1957 and 1958. Some of the thorium concentrate produced was shipped to Davison Chemical Company

  8. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Markite Co - NY 49

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Markite Co - NY 49 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: MARKITE CO. (NY.49 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 155 Waverly Place , New York , New York NY.49-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.49-2 Site Operations: Conducted experiments with very small amounts of uranium and thorium. NY.49-2 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Handled limited amounts of radioactive materials - Potential for contamination remote NY.49-2 Radioactive Materials

  9. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Maryland Disposal Site - MD 05

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Maryland Disposal Site - MD 05 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: MARYLAND DISPOSAL SITE (MD.05 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Baltimore - Vicinity , Maryland MD.05-1 Evaluation Year: 1989 MD.05-1 Site Operations: Proposed disposal site - never developed. MD.05-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated Radioactive Materials Handled: None Indicated Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: None Indicated Radiological Survey(s): None

  10. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Hood Building - MA 01 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Hood Building - MA 01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, HOOD BUILDING (MA.01 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Cambridge , Massachusetts MA.01-1 Evaluation Year: 1986 MA.01-2 Site Operations: Facility was acquired by the AEC and engaged in research and development activities involving research quantities of uranium,

  11. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Maywood Site - NJ 10

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Maywood Site - NJ 10 FUSRAP Considered Sites Maywood, NJ Alternate Name(s): Maywood Chemical Works Maywood Chemical Company Maywood Interim Storage Site (MISS) Stepan Chemical Company NJ.10-2 NJ.10-3 NJ.10-7 NJ.10-11 Location: 100 West Hunter Avenue, Maywood/Rochelle Park, New Jersey NJ.10-4 Historical Operations: Processed monazite sands for extraction of rare earth compounds and mantle-grade thorium nitrates. NJ.10-2 NJ.10-3 NJ.10-4 NJ.10-5 Eligibility Determination: Eligible NJ.10-1 NJ.10-10

  12. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Medart Co - MO 09

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Medart Co - MO 09 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: MEDART CO. (MO.09 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP - Facility believed to be torn down and the original site built over Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 180 Potomoc Street , St. Louis , Missouri MA.09-4 Evaluation Year: Circa 1990 MA.09-3 Site Operations: Conducted test machining operations on uranium bar stock during the early 1950s. MA.09-2 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination

  13. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Metcut Research - US 08

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Metcut Research - US 08 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: METCUT RESEARCH (US.08 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Unknown Evaluation Year: 1991 US.08-1 Site Operations: Site was visited by Feed Materials Production Center representatives. US.08-2 US.08-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No indication of radioactive materials handled at this site US.08-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: None Indicated Primary Radioactive Materials

  14. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Michigan Velsicol Chemical Corp - MI

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    03 Michigan Velsicol Chemical Corp - MI 03 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: MICHIGAN [VELSICOL] CHEMICAL CORP. (MI.03 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Velsicol Chemical Corp. MI.03-1 Location: St. Louis , Michigan MI.03-2 Evaluation Year: Circa 1987 MI.03-3 Site Operations: Rare earth processing facility. MI.03-2 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No Authority - NRC survey MI.03-3 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive

  15. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Middlesex Sampling Plant - NJ 04

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Sampling Plant - NJ 04 FUSRAP Considered Sites Middlesex Sampling Plant, NJ Alternate Name(s): None Location: Mountain Avenue, Middlesex, New Jersey NJ.04-2 Historical Operations: Processed and stored domestic and foreign ores containing uranium, thorium, and berryllium. NJ.04-4 NJ.04-5 Eligibility Determination: Eligible NJ.04-1 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Surveys NJ.04-6 NJ.04-7 NJ.04-8 NJ.04-9 NJ.04-10 Site Status: Cleanup in progress by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. NJ.04-11 NJ.04-12

  16. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Milwaukee Airport - WI 04

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Milwaukee Airport - WI 04 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: MILWAUKEE AIRPORT (WI.04 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Milwaukee Airport , Milwaukee , Wisconsin WI.04-1 Evaluation Year: 1991 WI.04-1 Site Operations: Airport Facility received a shipment of Uranium oxides from Allegheny Ludlow sent to an AEC employee - final destination unknown. WI.04-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Limited scope of activities performed

  17. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co -

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    PA 30 Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co - PA 30 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: MINNEAPOLIS-HONEYWELL REGULATOR CO (PA.30 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Brown Instrument Division PA.30-1 Location: Wayne and Roberts Avenue , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania PA.30-2 Evaluation Year: 1987 PA.30-3 Site Operations: Research/Development and Testing - small-scale thermal conductivity test on uranium rods - early 1950s. PA.30-1 PA.30-2

  18. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Mobil Oil Corp - VA 01

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Mobil Oil Corp - VA 01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Mobil Oil Corp. (VA.01 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corporation VA.01-1 Location: 818 Perry Street , Richmond , Virginia VA.01-1 Evaluation Year: Circa 1987 VA.01-2 VA.01-3 Site Operations: Research/Development to recover Uranium as a byproduct of phosphate production; preparatory process for pilot plant scale operation at Nichols, Florida.

  19. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Monsanto Chemical Company - OH 30

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Monsanto Chemical Company - OH 30 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: MONSANTO CHEMICAL COMPANY (OH.30 ) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (FUSRAP) - Cleanup Pending Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Monsanto Unit I & Warehouse OH.30-1 Location: Unit I - 1515 Nicholas Road and Warehouse - Third and Sears Streets , Dayton , Ohio OH.30-2 Evaluation Year: Circa 1980s Site Operations: Unit I - Monsanto Central Research Facilities conducted basic research - polonium. Warehouse - Conducted

  20. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Monticello Mill Site - UT 03

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Mill Site - UT 03 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Monticello Mill Site (UT.03) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see Monticello, Utah, Disposal and Processing Sites Documents Related to Monticello Mill Site Monticello Mill Tailings Site Operable Unit III Interim Remedial Action Progress Report July 1999-July 2000.

  1. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Morgantown Ordnance Works - WV 03

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Morgantown Ordnance Works - WV 03 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Morgantown Ordnance Works (WV.03 ) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: The former Pittsburgh Energy and Technology Center in Bruceton, Pennsylvania has merged with the Morgantown Energy Technology Center, and in December 1999 became the National Energy Technology

  2. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Motch and Merryweather - OH 46

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Motch and Merryweather - OH 46 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: MOTCH AND MERRYWEATHER (OH.46 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Cleveland , Ohio OH.46-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 OH.46-1 Site Operations: Research/Development and Testing of Uranium. OH.46-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Limited scope of activities performed - Potential for residual radioactive contamination considered remote OH.46-1 OH.46-2 Radioactive

  3. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Mound Laboratory - OH 19

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Mound Laboratory - OH 19 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Mound Laboratory (OH.19) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see Mound, Ohio, Site Documents Related to Mound Laboratory Workshop presentations emphasized the challenges of reindustrializing former DOE sites and the importance of involving local government and the community

  4. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- National Carbon Co - NY 48

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Carbon Co - NY 48 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: NATIONAL CARBON CO (NY.48) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: New York , New York NY.48-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.48-2 Site Operations: Produced graphite for the MED/AEC. NY.48-1 NY.48-2 NY.48-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for residual radioactive contamination considered remote - No indication that radioactive material was used on the site NY.48-2 Radioactive

  5. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- National Fireworks Ordnance Corp - MA

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    13 Fireworks Ordnance Corp - MA 13 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: NATIONAL FIREWORKS ORDNANCE CORP (MA.13) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: American Potash and Chemical Corporation MA.13-3 Location: West Hanover , Massachusetts MA.13-1 Evaluation Year: 1991 MA.13-1 Site Operations: Performed bench scale research and development on uranium forming during the 1960s. MA.13-2 MA.13-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for

  6. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- National Research Corp - Cambridge -

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    MA 10 Research Corp - Cambridge - MA 10 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: RESEARCH CORP. - CAMBRIDGE (MA.10) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 70 Memorial Drive , Cambridge , Massachusetts MA.10-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 MA.10-3 Site Operations: Subcontractor under Mallinckrodt; performed research and development on uranium and thorium metal fabrication during the late 1940s. MA.10-3 MA.10-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No

  7. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Naval Research Laboratory - DC 02

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Research Laboratory - DC 02 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY (DC.02 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP - Referred to DOD Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Washington , D.C. DC.02-4 Evaluation Year: 1987 DC.02-4 Site Operations: Research and development on thermal diffusion. DC.02-4 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No Authority - AEC licensed - Military facility DC.02-4 DC.02-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive

  8. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Navy Ammunition Depot - NJ 15

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Navy Ammunition Depot - NJ 15 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: NAVY AMMUNITION DEPOT (NJ.15) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP - Referred to DOD Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Earle, New Jersey NJ.15-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NJ.15-2 Site Operations: Storage facility and disposal unit for drummed radioactive waste that was dumped at sea. NJ.15-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Referred to DOD NJ.15-2 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary

  9. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Nevada Test Site - 023

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Nevada Test Site - 023 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Nevada Test Site (023) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: The Nevada Test Site was established by the Atomic Energy Commission in the 1950's to conduct field testing of nuclear explosives in connection with the research and development of nuclear weapons. The environmental

  10. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- New Canaan Site - CT 08

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Canaan Site - CT 08 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: NEW CANAAN SITE (CT.08) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: New Canaan , Connecticut CT.08-1 Evaluation Year: 1985 CT.08-2 Site Operations: None; Investigation of area prompted by public query; no site found in New Canaan. CT.08-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No AEC site located in this city CT.08-2 Radioactive Materials Handled: No Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: None

  11. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- New York University - NY 50

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    University - NY 50 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: NEW YORK UNIVERSITY (NY.50) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: New York , New York NY.50-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.50-1 Site Operations: Activities were related to equipment development. Counters and a small quantity of uranium oxide were provided by the AEC for work under contract AT(30-1)-1256. NY.50-2 NY.50-3 NY.50-4 NY.50-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for

  12. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Norfolk Naval Station - VA 05

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Norfolk Naval Station - VA 05 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: NORFOLK NAVAL STATION (VA.05) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Norfolk , Virginia VA.05-1 Evaluation Year: 1993 VA.05-1 Site Operations: Demonstration of extinguishing a uranium fire at the Fire Fighters School for AEC contractors. VA.05-3 VA.05-2 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination considered remote based on the limited quantity of materials

  13. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- North Carolina State University - NC

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    01 Carolina State University - NC 01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY (NC.01) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: North Carolina State College NC.01-1 Location: Raleigh , North Carolina NC.01-1 Evaluation Year: 1993 NC.01-2 Site Operations: Performed investigative research concerning the measurement of the thermal properties of certain granular materials in 1953 and 1954. NC.01-1 NC.01-4 NC.01-5 Site

  14. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Norton Co - MA 12

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Norton Co - MA 12 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: NORTON CO. (MA.12) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 1 New Bond Street , Worcester , Massachusetts MA.12-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 MA.12-3 Site Operations: Manufactured refractory products using thorium and uranium metal. MA.12-3 MA.12-4 Site Disposition: Eliminated - NRC licensed - Potential for contamination considered remote based on the limited scope of activities

  15. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Nuclear Development Corp of America -

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    NY 32 Development Corp of America - NY 32 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: NUCLEAR DEVELOPMENT CORP. OF AMERICA (NY.32) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 5 New Street , White Plains , New York NY.32-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.32-2 Site Operations: Conducted experiments involving uranium recovery from scrap. NY.32-2 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No Authority - Facility was licensed to handle nuclear materials NY.32-2

  16. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- OARDC - OH 11

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    OARDC - OH 11 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: OARDC (OH.11) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: This site is one of a group of 77 FUSRAP considered sites for which few, if any records are available in their respective site files to provide an historical account of past operations and their relationship, if any, with MED/AEC

  17. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Oakridge_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Tennessee Oak Ridge, Tennessee, Warehouses Site FUSRAP Site Oak Ridge Warehouses Map Background-The Oak Ridge Warehouses Site, located in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-The Oak Ridge Warehouses Site was used in the early 1940s by the Manhattan Engineer

  18. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Ohio State University Metallurgical

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Engineering Experiment Station -OH 0-05 Ohio State University Metallurgical Engineering Experiment Station -OH 0-05 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION (OH.0-05 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP - Referred to NRC Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Columbus , Ohio OH.0-05-1 Evaluation Year: 1986 OH.0-05-2 Site Operations: Ohio State ordered 130 grams of uranium from the AEC. This commercial

  19. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Oliver Corp - MI 11

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Oliver Corp - MI 11 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: OLIVER CORP. (MI.11 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP - Referred to NRC Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Behnke Warehousing Incorporated MI.11-1 Location: 433 East Michigan Avenue , Battle Creek , Michigan MI.11-1 Evaluation Year: 1986 MI.11-4 Site Operations: Conducted production scale briquetting of green salt and magnesium blend under AEC license Nos. SNM-591, SUB-579, and C-3725. MI.11-1 MI.11-3 Site

  20. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Osborne Co - OH 34

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Osborne Co - OH 34 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: OSBORNE CO. ( OH.34 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Cleveland , Ohio OH.34-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 OH.34-1 Site Operations: Metal Fabrication Operations - Research/Development and Testing - Uranium Metal. OH.34-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Limited scope of activities performed - potential for contamination considered remote OH.34-2 Radioactive Materials