National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for ky tn ny

  1. Origin State>> CA ID ID IL IL KY NM NM NV NY OH TN TN TN, WA,

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    IL IL KY NM NM NV NY OH TN TN TN, WA, CA TN TN TN TN Total Shipments by Route Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Batelle Energy Alliance Idaho National Laboratory Energx Argonne National Laboratory Argonne National Laboratory Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant Sandia National Laboratory Los Alamos National Laboratory National Security Technologies West Valley Environmental Services Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Duratek/Energy Solutions Babcox & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12 Plant

  2. Origin State>> CA ID ID ID IL KY NV NY NY OH TN TN TN, WA, CA

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    NV NY NY OH TN TN TN, WA, CA TN TN TN TN TX Total Shipments by Route Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Batelle Energy Alliance Idaho National Laboratory Argonne National Laboratory Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant National Security Technologies Brookhaven National Laboratory West Valley Environmental Services Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Duratek/Energy Solutions Babcox & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12 Plant Materials & Energy Corporation

  3. Origin State>> CA ID ID ID IL KY MD NM NM NY NY OH SC TN TN

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    MD NM NM NY NY OH SC TN TN TN, WA, CA TN TN TN TN TX Total Shipments by Route Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Batelle Energy Alliance Idaho National Laboratory Argonne National Laboratory Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant Aberdeen Proving Ground Los Alamos National Laboratory Sandia National Laboratory Brookhaven National Laboratory West Valley Environmental Services Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Savannah River Site Duratek/Energy Solutions Babcox

  4. Origin State>> CA CA ID ID ID IL KY MD NM NM NV NY NY OH TN

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    NM NM NV NY NY OH TN TN TN, WA, CA TN TN TN TN TX Total Shipments by Route Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory General Atomics Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Batelle Energy Alliance Idaho National Laboratory Argonne National Laboratory Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant Aberdeen Proving Ground Los Alamos National Laboratory Sandia National Laboratory National Security Technologies Brookhaven National Laboratory West Valley Environmental Services Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant

  5. Origin State>> CA CA ID ID IL KY NJ NM NY NY NV OH OH SC TN

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    SC TN TN TN TN TN TN TN TX Total Shipments by Route Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Boeing/Rocketdyne Idaho National Labaratoy Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Argonne National Laboratory Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Sandia National Laboratory Brookhaven National Laboratory West Valley Demonstration Project National Security Technologies, Inc. Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Fernald Closure Project Savannah River Site BWXT Y-12 Plant Duratek

  6. Origin State>> CA ID ID ID IL MD NM NM NV NY NY OH SC TN TN

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    NV NY NY OH SC TN TN TN, WA, CA TN TN TN Total Shipments by Route Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Batelle Energy Alliance Idaho National Laboratory Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Argonne National Laboratory Aberdeen Proving Ground Sandia National Laboratory Los Alamos National Laboratory National Security Technologies Brookhaven National Laboratory West Valley Environmental Services Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Savannah River Site Duratek/Energy Solutions Babcox & Wilcox

  7. Origin State>> CA ID ID ID IL MD NM NM NY OH TN TN TN, WA, CA

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    NY OH TN TN TN, WA, CA TN TN TN TX Total Shipments by Route Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Batelle Energy Alliance Idaho National Laboratory Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Argonne National Laboratory Aberdeen Proving Ground Sandia National Laboratory Los Alamos National Laboratory Brookhaven National Laboratory Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Duratek/Energy Solutions Babcox & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12 Plant Materials & Energy Corporation (M&EC) Perma-Fix

  8. Origin State>> CA CA ID ID ID IL KY MD MO NM NM NY NY OH SC

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    MO NM NM NY NY OH SC TN TN TN, WA, CA TN TN TN TN Total Shipments by Route Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory General Atomics Batelle Energy Alliance Idaho National Laboratory Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Argonne National Laboratory Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant Aberdeen Proving Grounds National Security Technologies Sandia National Laboratory Los Alamos National Laboratory Brookhaven National Laboratory CH2M Hill B&W West Valley, LLC Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant

  9. NY

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    NY 17.8 Prepared by Oak Ridge Associated Universities Prepgred for Office of Operationaf Safety U.S. Department of Energy Ezrt /ur / POST REMEDIAL ACTION SURVEY PROPERTY OF MODERN LANDFILL, INC. FORMER LOOW SITE LEWISTON, NEW YORK J.D. BERGER R a d i o l o g l c a l S t t e A s s e s s r n e n t P r o g r a m M a n p o t a e r E d u c a t l o n , R e s e a r c h , a n d T r a l n i n g D l v i s l o n FINAL REPORT January 1982 POST REIEDIAT ACTION SURVBY PROPERTY OF }TODBRN I.AIIDPILL' INC.

  10. Sylvania Corporation, Hicksville, NY and Bayside, NY | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    NY Sylvania Corporation, Hicksville, NY and Bayside, NY Sylvania Corporation, Hicksville, NY and Bayside, NY, July 8, 2004. sylvania_corporation.pdf PDF icon Sylvania Corporation, Hicksville, NY and Bayside, NY More Documents & Publications Sylvania Corporation, Hicksville, NY and Bayside NY Sylvania Corporation, Hicksville, NY and Bayside, NY - Addendum to July 8, 2004 Index2.doc

  11. Origin State>> CA ID ID ID IL NM NM OH TN TN TN, WA, CA TN TN

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    NM NM OH TN TN TN, WA, CA TN TN TN TN TX Total Shipments by Route Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Batelle Energy Alliance Idaho National Laboratory Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Argonne National Laboratory Sandia National Laboratory Los Alamos National Laboratory Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Duratek/Energy Solutions Babcox & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12 Plant Materials & Energy Corporation (M&EC) Perma-Fix Nuclear Fuels Services Wastren Advantage, Inc.

  12. Sylvania Corporation, Hicksville, NY and Bayside NY | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Sylvania Corporation, Hicksville, NY and Bayside NY Sylvania Corporation, Hicksville, NY and Bayside NY Sylvania Corporation, Hicksville, NY and Bayside NY. Memorandum_to_reader.pdf Memorandum July 8, 2004. PDF icon Sylvania Corporation, Hicksville, NY and Bayside NY More Documents & Publications Sylvania Corporation, Hicksville, NY and Bayside, NY Sylvania Corporation, Hicksville, NY and Bayside, NY - Addendum to July 8, 2004 Index2.doc

  13. NY Green Bank

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    NY Green Bank 1359 Broadway, 19th Floor, New York, NY 10018 212.379.6257 | www.greenbank.ny.gov | info@nygreenbank.ny.gov Monday, October 6 th , 2014 Remarks by Nicholas Whitcombe, Managing Director, New York Green Bank Panel 1: Attracting and Maintaining Capital for Energy Transmission, Storage, and Distribution Quadrennial Energy Review Public Meeting in New York, NY: Energy Infrastructure Finance The conventional clean energy capital markets for large scale infrastructure are deep and robust.

  14. Sylvania Corporation, Hicksville, NY and Bayside, NY - Addendum to July

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    8, 2004 | Department of Energy NY - Addendum to July 8, 2004 Sylvania Corporation, Hicksville, NY and Bayside, NY - Addendum to July 8, 2004 Sylvania Corporation, Hicksville, NY and Bayside, NY - Addendum to July 8, 2004, additional_sylvania.pdf memorandum Date: October 6, 2004 Reply to Attn of: Department of Energy Headquarters FOIA/Privacy Act Office PDF icon Sylvania Corporation, Hicksville, NY and Bayside, NY - Addendum to July 8, 2004 More Documents & Publications Index2.doc

  15. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Buffalo NY Site - NY 54

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Buffalo NY Site - NY 54 FUSRAP Considered Sites Buffalo, NY Alternate Name(s): Bliss & Laughlin Steel Company Niagara Cold Drawn Steel Corporation Ramco Steel Incorporated NY.54-1 NY.54-4 Location: 110 Hopkins Street, Buffalo, New York NY.54-1 Historical Operations: Machined and straightened uranium rods as subcontracted work from National Lead Company, an AEC contractor. NY.54-3 NY.54-4 LTSM012601 Eligibility Determination: Eligible NY.54-4 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Surveys,

  16. NY-Sun Loan Program

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    NY-Sun loan program is part of broader NY-Sun Initiative program to accelerate the use of solar PV across the State. In addition to cash incentives, NY-Sun Initiative also provides State sponsored...

  17. Renewable Heat NY

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    NOTE: On August 2015, NYSERDA increased the incentive levels for technologies offered under the Renewable Heat NY program. In general, new incentives fund up to 45% of the total project cost, which...

  18. US ESC TN Site Consumption

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ESC TN Site Consumption million Btu $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 US ESC TN Expenditures dollars ALL ENERGY average per household (excl. transportation) 0 4,000 8,000 12,000 16,000 US ESC TN Site Consumption kilowatthours $0 $400 $800 $1,200 $1,600 US ESC TN Expenditures dollars ELECTRICITY ONLY average per household * Tennessee households consume an average of 79 million Btu per year, about 12% less than the U.S. average. * Average electricity consumption for Tennessee households is 33%

  19. File:EIA-Appalach7-TN-KY-GAS.pdf | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Appalachian Basin, Kentucky and Tennessee By 2001 Gas Reserve Class Sources Energy Information Administration Authors Samuel H. Limerick; Lucy Luo; Gary Long; David F....

  20. File:EIA-Appalach7-TN-KY-LIQ.pdf | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Samuel H. Limerick; Lucy Luo; Gary Long; David F. Morehouse; Jack Perrin; Robert F. King Related Technologies Oil, Natural Gas Creation Date 2005-09-01 Extent Regional...

  1. File:EIA-Appalach7-TN-KY-BOE.pdf | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Samuel H. Limerick; Lucy Luo; Gary Long; David F. Morehouse; Jack Perrin; Robert F. King Related Technologies Oil, Natural Gas Creation Date 2005-09-01 Extent Regional...

  2. Origin State>> CA CA ID ID IL KY NJ NM NY NY NV OH OH OH SC

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Mix Wastew Treatment Project Argonne National Laboratory Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Sandia National Laboratory Brookhaven National Laboratory West Valley Demonstration Project National Security Technologies, Inc. Mound Closure Project Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Fernald Closure Project Savannah River Site BWXT Y-12 Plant Duratek Nuclear Fuels UT-Battelle Bechtel Jacobs Permafix M&EC EnergX (Foster Wheeler) Pantex Plant SOUTHERN I-15, CA-127,

  3. Origin State>> CA CA ID ID IL KY NJ NM NY NY NV OH OH OH SC

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Mixed Waste Treatment Project Argonne National Laboratory Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Sandia National Laboratory Brookhaven National Laboratory West Valley Demonstration Project National Security Technologies, Inc. Mound Closure Project Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Fernald Closure Project Savannah River Site BWXT Y-12 Plant Duratek Nuclear Fuels UT-Battelle Bechtel Jacobs Permafix M&EC EnergX (formerly Foster Wheeler) Pantex Plant SOUTHERN I-15,

  4. Category:Syracuse, NY | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    KB SVLargeOffice Syracuse NY Consolidated Edison Co-NY Inc.png SVLargeOffice Syracuse... 68 KB SVMediumOffice Syracuse NY Consolidated Edison Co-NY Inc.png SVMediumOffice...

  5. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- New York, NY, Site - NY 61

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    York, NY, Site - NY 61 FUSRAP Considered Sites New York, NY Alternate Name(s): Baker and Williams Warehouses Ralph Ferrara Company Warehouses Ralph Ferrara, Inc. NY.61-2 Location: 513-519, 521-527, and 529-535 West 20th Street, New York, New York NY.61-3 Historical Operations: Received and stored uranium ores and concentrates for MED. NY.61-5 NY.61-6 NY.61-7 Eligibility Determination: Eligible NY.61-1 NY.61-2 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Surveys, Verification Surveys NY.61-3 NY.61-4

  6. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Oak Ridge TN Warehouse Site - TN 09

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Oak Ridge TN Warehouse Site - TN 09 FUSRAP Considered Sites Oak Ridge, TN, Warehouses Alternate Name(s): Elza Gate Elza Gate Warehouse Area Melton Lake Industrial Park MED Warehouses TN.09-1 TN.09-8 Location: Meco Lane (formerly Antwerp Lane), Melton Industrial Park, Oak Ridge, Tennessee TN.09-7 Historical Operations: Stored pitchblende (high-grade uranium ore) and slag and tailings, which released uranium, radium, and thorium. TN.09-3 TN.09-7 TN.09-8 Eligibility Determination: Eligible TN.09-1

  7. ACIM-~ NY.49

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ' h:. ,,, ,_" , ACIM-~ NY.49 .,. i MEMORANDUM TO: FILE DATE FE: __~-tt_c~7' e_-_~-~------- --------- "%Kf-- ---- ---i------- Current: ~~~~~~--------__---_______ xf yee, date contacted- IVPE OF OPERATION f- ------------- Research & Development 0 Production scale testing 0 Pilot Scale 0 Bench Scale Process z Theoretical Studies Sample 84 Analysis 0 Production 0 Disposal/Storage a Facility Type 0 Manufacturing 0 University 0 Research Organization 0 Government Sponsored Fat a Other

  8. NY-%-3 P

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    NY-%-3 P m F P F ?- P m ?- c m P P CII (I pl F F- 3?r -J-J-. _- /, i ;. / 0 Aerospace Report No. ATR-82 (796344-2 i Aq, is y !i,' Evaluation of the 1943Hto# 1946 ilid Liquid Effluent Discharge From the Linde Air Products Company Ceramics Plant December 198 I Prepared for Office of Operational Safety Assistant Secretary for Environmental Protection, Safety, and Emergency Preparedness U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Prepared by Environment and Conservation Directorate Eastern Technical Division THE

  9. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant - KY

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    01 Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant - KY 01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (KY.01 ) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/factsheets/paducgdp.htm Documents Related to Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant

  10. Category:Rochester, NY | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    in this category, out of 16 total. SVFullServiceRestaurant Rochester NY Consolidated Edison Co-NY Inc.png SVFullServiceRestauran... 70 KB SVQuickServiceRestaurant Rochester NY...

  11. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Niagara Falls Storage Site NY - NY 17

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Considered Sites > Niagara Falls Storage Site NY - NY 17 FUSRAP Considered Sites Niagara Falls Storage Site, NY Alternate Name(s): Lake Ontario Ordnance Works (LOOW) Niagara Falls Storage Site (NFSS) DOE-Niagara Falls Storage Site NY.17-1 NY.17-3 Location: Lewiston, New York NY.17-5 Historical Operations: Stored, shipped, and buried radioactive equipment and waste for MED and AEC containing uranium, radium, and thorium. Contains Interim Waste Containment Structure. NY.17-1 NY.17-2 NY.17-14

  12. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Guterl Specialty Steel - NY 12

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Guterl Specialty Steel - NY 12 FUSRAP Considered Sites Guterl Specialty Steel, NY Alternate Name(s): Simonds Saw and Steel Co. Guterl Steel Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp. NY.12-1 NY.12-2 Location: Ohio Street and Route 95, Lockport, New York NY.12-12 Historical Operations: Performed rolling mill operations on natural uranium and thorium metal. NY.12-6 NY.12-7 Eligibility Determination: NY.12-11 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Surveys NY.12-1 NY.12-4 NY.12-8 NY.12-9 NY.12-12 Site Status: Cleanup

  13. FY2011 2nd QTR.xls

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    IL KY MD NM NY OH SC TN TN TN TN, WA, CA TN TN TN TX Total Shipments by Route Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Boeing Company Batelle Energy Alliance Idaho National Laboratory Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Energx Argonne National Laboratory Argonne National Laboratory Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant Aberdeen Proving Ground Sandia National Laboratory Brookhaven National Laboratory Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Savannah River Site UT Batelle/Oak Ridge National Laboratory

  14. Upstate NY Power Corp | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    NY Power Corp Jump to: navigation, search Name: Upstate NY Power Corp Place: West Seneca, New York Zip: 14224-3454 Sector: Wind energy Product: Developer of clean energy projects...

  15. Western NY Energy LLC | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    search Name: Western NY Energy LLC Place: Mount Morris, New York Zip: 14510 Product: Bioethanol producer. References: Western NY Energy LLC1 This article is a stub. You can help...

  16. AER NY Kinetics LLC | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    AER NY Kinetics LLC Jump to: navigation, search Name: AER NY Kinetics LLC Address: PO Box 585 21 Entrance Avenue Place: Ogdensburg Zip: 13669 Region: United States Sector: Marine...

  17. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Knoxville Iron Co - TN 07

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Knoxville Iron Co - TN 07 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: KNOXVILLE IRON CO. (TN.07 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Knoxville , Tennessee TN.07-1 Evaluation Year: 1994 TN.07-2 TN.07-3 Site Operations: Melted uranium contaminated scrap metal in order to test industrial hygiene procedures in the mid-1950s. TN.07-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - AEC license TN.07-2 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive

  18. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Syracuse University - NY 29

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Syracuse University - NY 29 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY (NY.29) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Syracuse , New York NY.29-1 Evaluation Year: 1994 NY.29-2 Site Operations: Activities included work with uranium oxide and the precipitation of thorium iodate from homogeneous solution. NY.29-1 NY.29-3 NY.29-4 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination remote NY.29-2 Radioactive Materials

  19. West KY Regional Middle School Science Bowl | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    West KY Regional Middle School Science Bowl West KY Regional Middle School Science Bowl Deegan Lawrence (far right) from Henderson County North Middle School gives an answer as teammates D.J. Banks (middle) and Alex Chandler look on during DOE's West Kentucky Regional Middle School Science Bowl in Paducah February 6. Henderson North won the competition and will compete in DOE's National Science Bowl® in Washington, D.C. April 30 through May 4. Addthis Related Articles 1st Place Henderson County

  20. Microsoft Word - figure_03.doc

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Oil and Gas Reserves"; PointLogic Energy; Ventyx; and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, and predecessor agencies. IN OH TN WV VA KY MD PA NY VT NH MA CT ME...

  1. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Colonie - NY 06

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Colonie - NY 06 FUSRAP Considered Sites Colonie, NY Alternate Name(s): Colonie Interim Storage Site National Lead Industries NY.06-1 Location: 1130 Central Avenue, Colonie, New York NY.06-1 Historical Operations: Fabricated and processed uranium metal for the AEC, resulting in contamination from thorium and natural, enriched, and depleted uranium. NY.06-1 NY.06-4 NY.06-5 Eligibility Determination: Eligible NY.06-2 NY.06-3 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Surveys, Verification Surveys NY.06-6

  2. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Gleason Works - NY 55

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Gleason Works - NY 55 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: GLEASON WORKS (NY.55 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Rochester , New York NY.55-1 Evaluation Year: 1994 NY.55-2 Site Operations: Metal fabrication operations - Rolled uranium metal. NY.55-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination considered remote NY.55-2 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Uranium NY.55-1

  3. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Hooker Chemical Co - NY 05

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Hooker Chemical Co - NY 05 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Hooker Chemical Co. (NY.05) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Occidental Chemical Corporation Hooker Electrochemical Corporation NY.05-1 NY.05-2 Location: Niagara Falls , New York NY.05-3 Evaluation Year: 1985 NY.05-1 NY.05-2 Site Operations: Design, engineering, construction, equipping and operation of a plant for the manufacture of Product 45 (xylene hexachloride); MFL (Miller's

  4. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Niagara Falls Vicinity Properties NY -

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    NY 17 Niagara Falls Vicinity Properties NY - NY 17 FUSRAP Considered Sites Niagara Falls Vicinity Properties, NY Alternate Name(s): Lake Ontario Ordnance Works (LOOW) Niagara Falls Storage Site (NFSS) DOE-Niagara Falls Storage Site NY.17-1 NY.17-3 Location: Lewiston , New York NY.17-5 Historical Operations: Stored, shipped, and buried radioactive equipment and waste for MED and AEC containing uranium, radium, and thorium. Portions of the former site are privately owned, creating a

  5. ESPC Workshop (Nashville, TN) | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    ESPC Workshop (Nashville, TN) ESPC Workshop (Nashville, TN) March 29, 2016 8:00AM EDT to March 31, 2016 4:00PM EDT This three-day workshop educates attendees on how to implement energy and water projects through an energy savings performance contract (ESPC). The workshop consists of a basic introduction to the Department of Energy IDIQ contracts and how to get started with an ESPC project at your site

  6. NY Green Bank | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    sector to address and alleviate market and financial barriers preventing a thriving clean energy marketplace. NY Green Bank does not accept deposits or offer retail loans, and...

  7. NY.O-20- I

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ; I.-' NY.O-20- I ' 3% 3 MEMORANDUM TO: FILE FKOM: An&x?! w311E? SUHYECT: .Elimination of Pyroferric Co. New Yor SITE ALT NAME: EYE&XCLG f2!Y2~!2Y 621 E. 216th St. CITY: N__ew_ yw-r; STATE: N__V _ok!kEKm. Past: P_rrof_errrLc Go: current: Qwner contacted X yes no; if yes, date co Past owner2 IYE OE C)PEEux!N g Research et Develapment Faci - Production scale testing x M XX - Experimental tests U - Henoh.Scale Process R - Theoretical Studies Gove - Sample % Analysis 0 Production

  8. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Markite Co - NY 49

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Markite Co - NY 49 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: MARKITE CO. (NY.49 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 155 Waverly Place , New York , New York NY.49-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.49-2 Site Operations: Conducted experiments with very small amounts of uranium and thorium. NY.49-2 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Handled limited amounts of radioactive materials - Potential for contamination remote NY.49-2 Radioactive Materials

  9. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- ACF Industries Inc - NY 13

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Inc - NY 13 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: ACF Industries, Inc. (NY.13 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: American Car and Foundry Company NY.13-2 Location: Buffalo , New York NY.13-2 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.13-1 Site Operations: Procured, produced, and delivered mechanical and cryogenic weapons components. No radioactive materials used at the site. NY.13-2 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Declared clean by AEC and returned to the prime

  10. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Bethlehem Steel Corporation - NY 02

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Bethlehem Steel Corporation - NY 02 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION (NY.02 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Lackawanna , New York NY.02-1 Evaluation Year: 1985 NY.02-2 Site Operations: Conducted high temperature alpha-phase rolling tests on uranium metal in the 1950s. NY.02-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Radiation levels below criteria NY.02-5 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary

  11. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Columbia University - NY 03

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Columbia University - NY 03 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Columbia University (NY.03 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: New York , New York NY.03-1 Evaluation Year: 1985 NY.03-2 NY.03-3 Site Operations: Early research and development -- nuclear chain reaction (fission) and gaseous diffusion during the 1940s. NY.03-4 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Radiation levels below criteria - Indication of university sponsored

  12. New York Battery and Energy Storage Technology Consortium NY...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Battery and Energy Storage Technology Consortium NY BEST Jump to: navigation, search Name: New York Battery and Energy Storage Technology Consortium (NY-BEST) Place: Albany, New...

  13. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- National Carbon Co - NY 48

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Carbon Co - NY 48 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: NATIONAL CARBON CO (NY.48) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: New York , New York NY.48-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.48-2 Site Operations: Produced graphite for the MED/AEC. NY.48-1 NY.48-2 NY.48-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for residual radioactive contamination considered remote - No indication that radioactive material was used on the site NY.48-2 Radioactive

  14. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- New York University - NY 50

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    University - NY 50 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: NEW YORK UNIVERSITY (NY.50) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: New York , New York NY.50-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.50-1 Site Operations: Activities were related to equipment development. Counters and a small quantity of uranium oxide were provided by the AEC for work under contract AT(30-1)-1256. NY.50-2 NY.50-3 NY.50-4 NY.50-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for

  15. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Love Canal - NY 24

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Love Canal - NY 24 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: LOVE CANAL (NY.24 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None NY.24-1 Location: Region running from Old Military Road from the 16-acre rectangular piece of land in the southeast corner of Niagara Falls into the Township of Lewiston , Niagara Falls , New York NY.24-3 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.24-1 Site Operations: Chemical storage and disposal. NY.24-1 NY.24-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No

  16. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Seaway Industrial Park - NY 09

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Seaway Industrial Park - NY 09 FUSRAP Considered Sites Seaway Industrial Park, NY Alternate Name(s): Seaway Industrial Landfill Seaway Landfill Charles St. Plant NY.09-2 NY.09-3 Location: River Road, Tonawanda, New York NY.09-4 Historical Operations: Received approximately 6,000 cubic yards of low-grade uranium mill tailings and processing residues from the Ashland (Tonawanda North Units 1 and 2) sites. NY.09-5 Eligibility Determination: Eligible NY.09-1 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment

  17. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Sylvania Corning Plant - NY 19

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Plant - NY 19 FUSRAP Considered Sites Sylvania-Corning, NY Alternate Name(s): Sylvania Electric Products, Inc. Sylvania Corp. NY.19-1 NY.19-4 Location: Cantiaque Road, Hicksville, Long Island, New York NY.19-5 Historical Operations: Pilot-scale production of powdered metal uranium slugs for AEC's Hanford reactor. NY.19-4 Eligibility Determination: Eligible Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Survey NY.19-3 Site Status: Cleanup in progress by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. USACE Website Long-term

  18. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- American Railway Express Office - NY

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    0-03 Railway Express Office - NY 0-03 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: American Railway Express Office (NY.0-03 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: American Railway Express (Downtown) , New York , New York NY.0-03-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.0-03-1 Site Operations: None - Involved with a fire during transport of uranium scrap. NY.0-03-2 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination remote NY.0-03-1 NY.0-03-2

  19. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Electromet Corporation - NY 04

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Electromet Corporation - NY 04 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Electromet Corporation (NY.04 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP - Referred to US EPA and New York State Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 4625 Royal Avenue , Niagara Falls , New York NY.04-1 Evaluation Year: 1985 NY.04-2 NY.04-3 Site Operations: Cast zirconium sponge into ingots in the 1950s. NY.04-4 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No Authority NY.04-2 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary

  20. US MidAtl NY Site Consumption

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    MidAtl NY Site Consumption million Btu $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 US MidAtl NY Expenditures dollars ALL ENERGY average per household (excl. transportation) 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 US MidAtl NY Site Consumption kilowatthours $0 $250 $500 $750 $1,000 $1,250 $1,500 US MidAtl NY Expenditures dollars ELECTRICITY ONLY average per household * New York households consume an average of 103 million Btu per year, 15% more than the U.S. average. * Electricity consumption in

  1. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn - NY

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    0-19 Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn - NY 0-19 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: NY.0-19 (POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE OF BROOKLYN) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: New York , New York NY.0-19-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.0-19-1 Site Operations: Research and development involving only small quantities of radiological material in a controlled environment. NY.0-19-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination remote

  2. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Radiation Applications Inc - NY 57

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Radiation Applications Inc - NY 57 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: RADIATION APPLICATIONS, INC. ( NY.57 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: RAI NY.57-1 Location: 370 Lexington Avenue , New York , New York NY.57-3 Evaluation Year: 1991 NY.57-4 Site Operations: Developed foam separation techniques and proposed investigations to remove cesium and strontium from fission product waste solutions. No indication that a substantial quantity of

  3. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Rensslaer Polytechnic Institute - NY

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    18 Rensslaer Polytechnic Institute - NY 18 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: RENSSLAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE (NY.18 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Troy , New York NY.18-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.18-1 Site Operations: Research activities involving small quantities of radioactive materials in a controlled environment - under AEC license. NY.18-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for residual contamination

  4. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Sacandaga - NY 51

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Sacandaga - NY 51 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: SACANDAGA (NY.51) Eliminated - Condition certified Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 823 Sacandaga Road , Glenville , New York NY.51-1 Evaluation Year: 1992 NY.51-2 Site Operations: Plant operated by General Electric during period spanning 1947 to 1951. Facilities housed studies involving radar, physics studies and sodium technology development. NY.51-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Radiation levels below criteria

  5. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Buflovak Co - NY 56

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Buflovak Co - NY 56 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Buflovak Co. (NY.56 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 1543 Fillmore Ave. , Buffalo , New York NY.56-1 Evaluation Year: 1991 NY.56-2 Site Operations: Research and testing with uranium raffinate. NY.56-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Possibility for contamination considered remote due to scope of tests conducted and indication of cleanup operations after tests

  6. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Allegheny-Ludlum Steel Corp - NY 01

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    NY 01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Allegheny-Ludlum Steel Corp (NY.01 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Al-Tech Specialty Steel Corporation NY.01-1 Location: Spring Street Road , Watervliet , New York NY.01-1 NY.01-2 Evaluation Year: 1985 NY.01-3 Site Operations: Metal fabrication -- rolled uranium ingots into rods. NY.01-4 NY.01-5 NY.01-6 NY.01-7 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Radiation levels below criteria NY.01-8 NY.01-9 Radioactive

  7. AT-TN: Mr. R. L. Rudolph

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    MAR 1 ? 7982 3echW tiational, Inc. AT-TN: Mr. R. L. Rudolph PO Box 350 Oak Ridge, TFi 37830 Gentlemen: CRITERIA FOR REMEDIAL ACTION AT ACID/PUEBLO AND BAY0 CANYONS; REQUEST FOR COST/BENEFIT ANALYSES OF REMEDIAL ACTION OPTIONS AT THE CANYONS Enclosed are several pieces of cqrespondence related to AcldjPueblo * and Bayo Canyons. . . . . . . . . . . . . . First, EP has concurred with the remedial action DATE criteria for the New Mexico sftes that were proposed to them on August 20, 1987 (wfth the

  8. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Staten Island Warehouse - NY 22

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Staten Island Warehouse - NY 22 FUSRAP Considered Sites Staten Island Warehouse, NY Alternate Name(s): Archer-Daniels Midland Company NY.22-3 Location: 2393 Richmond Terrace, Port Richmond, New York NY.22-2 Historical Operations: Stored pitchblende (high-grade uranium ore), which was purchased by the MED for the first atomic bomb. NY.22-3 Eligibility Determination: Eligible Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Survey NY.22-5 Site Status: Referred by DOE, evaluation in progess by U.S. Army Corps of

  9. File:USDA-CE-Production-GIFmaps-KY.pdf | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    KY.pdf Jump to: navigation, search File File history File usage Kentucky Ethanol Plant Locations Size of this preview: 776 600 pixels. Full resolution (1,650 1,275 pixels,...

  10. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Ledoux and Co - NY 37

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Ledoux and Co - NY 37 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: LEDOUX AND CO. (NY.37 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 155 Avenue of the Americas , New York , New York NY.37-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.37-1 Site Operations: Prime contractor to AEC, African Metals. LeDoux handled radioactive materials under this contract at other locations; records indicate that radioactive materials were not sent to the New York office.

  11. National Lab., TN (United States)] 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    G.M. Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States) 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; GROUND WATER; REMEDIAL ACTION; TECHNETIUM 99; SORPTION; PERTECHNETATES Groundwater used for...

  12. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Vitro Corp of America - TN 04

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    TN 04 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Vitro Corp. of America (TN.04) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Heavy Minerals Company Vitro Chemical Company TN.04-4 TN.04-5 Location: 4000 North Hawthorne Street , Chattanooga , Tennessee TN.04-5 Evaluation Year: 1990 TN.04-1 Site Operations: Processed mineral monazite to produce a thorium-uranium hydroxide and a series of rare earth products. TN.04-4 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Site

  13. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Seneca Army Depot - NY 11

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Seneca Army Depot - NY 11 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: SENECA ARMY DEPOT (NY.11 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Romulus , New York Evaluation Year: 1985 NY.11-2 NY.11-3 Site Operations: Eleven bunkers were used to store approximately 2,000 drums of pitchblende ore in the early 1940's. The bunkers were returned to munitions storage service after removal of the ore drums. NY.11-4 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Referred to

  14. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Tonawanda North Units 1 and 2 - NY 10

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Tonawanda North Units 1 and 2 - NY 10 FUSRAP Considered Sites Tonawanda North, NY, Units 1 and 2 Alternate Name(s): Ashland #1 and Ashland #2 Haist Property Seaway Area D Rattlesnake Creek NY.10-1 Location: State Highway 266, east of Interstate Highway 190, Tonawanda, NY NY.10-4 Historical Operations: Served as a repository for refined uranium and vanadium residues containing thorium and radium, generated by Linde Air Products. NY.10-4 NY.10-5 NY.10-6 NY.10-7 NY.10-9 Eligibility Determination:

  15. NlZWYORK4,N.Y.

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    AFRICAN .METALS~ C~RPO~~XON 41 BROAD STREET . i. ,,J iI: : LE OCT 2 2 1945 NlZWYORK4,N.Y. :October 5, 1945. Af-2-a L.: I.__: '../ . ._ The Area Engineer, U.S. Engineer Office, P.O. BOX 42, Station F., New York 16, N.Y. Gentlemen: Contract W-7405 eng-4. Reference is made to your letter EIDM A-33 MS of August 27th, 1945. Contract W-7405 eng-4 called for the delivery of 100 T of M-31, the M308 content of which was sold to you, whereas we reserved all rights to the R-l contained therein. We hereby

  16. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- American Machine and Foundry Co - NY

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    26 NY 26 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: American Machine and Foundry Co ( NY.26 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Lutheran Medical Center NY.26-1 Location: Second Avenue and 56th Street , Brooklyn , New York NY.26-2 Evaluation Year: 1992 NY.26-1 Site Operations: 1951 - 1954 conducted metal fabrication operation on uranium and thorium metals. NY.26-3 NY.26-4 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination considered remote

  17. Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board * P.O. Box 2001, EM-91, Oak Ridge, TN 37831

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board * P.O. Box 2001, EM-91, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Phone: 865-241-4583, 865-241-4584, 1-800-382-6938 * Fax: 865-241-6932 * Internet: www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab M Ma an ny y V Vo oi ic ce es s W Wo or rk ki in ng g f fo or r t th he e C Co om mm mu un ni it ty y O O a a k k R R i i d d g g e e S S i i t t e e S S p p e e c c i i f f i i c c A A d d v v i i s s o o r r y y B B o o a a r r d d September 11, 2014 Susan Cange Acting Manager Oak Ridge Office of

  18. P.O. Box 117, Oak Ridge, TN 37831

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Box 117, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 g (865) 241-8893 g IVsurveys@orau.org On the Web: www.orau.orgenvironmental-assessments-health-physics Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU) is a...

  19. Climate Action Champions: Knoxville, TN | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Knoxville, TN Climate Action Champions: Knoxville, TN Located on the banks of the Tennessee River and in the foothills of the Great Smoky Mountains, the City of Knoxville is a leader in protecting natural resources while promoting economic and social vitality. | Photo courtesy of the City of Knoxville. Located on the banks of the Tennessee River and in the foothills of the Great Smoky Mountains, the City of Knoxville is a leader in protecting natural resources while promoting economic and social

  20. NY-Sun PV Incentive Program (Residential and Small Business)...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    NY-Sun CommercialIndustrial Incentive program that offers incentives for grid connected PV systems larger than 200 KW. The New York State Energy Research and Development...

  1. Business Council of Westchester County (NY) | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    101 Place: White Plains, New York Zip: 10604 Region: Northeast - NY NJ CT PA Area Sector: Services Product: Green Power Marketer Website: www.westchesterny.org Coordinates:...

  2. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Fordham University - NY 0-12

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Fordham University - NY 0-12 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Fordham University (NY.0-12 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: New York , New York NY.0-12-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.0-12-1 Site Operations: Research and development involving small quantities of radioactive material in a controlled environment NY.0-12-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination remote NY.0-12-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes

  3. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Linde Air Products Div - Buffalo - NY

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    65 Div - Buffalo - NY 65 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: LINDE AIR PRODUCTS DIV. BUFFALO (NY.65 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Linde Chandler Street Plant NY.65-1 Location: Buffalo , New York NY.65-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.65-1 Site Operations: Developed and produced non-radioactive material for the Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion Plant under contract with the AEC. NY.65-2 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No indication that

  4. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Simmons Machine and Tool Inc - NY 35

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Simmons Machine and Tool Inc - NY 35 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: SIMMONS MACHINE AND TOOL, INC (NY.35) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 1000 North Broadway , Albany , New York NY.35-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.35-2 Site Operations: Tested equipment and machined uranium to test the equipment (one time event). NY.35-1 NY.35-2 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination considered remote due to limited scope

  5. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Enterprise Metal Products - NY 0-10

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Enterprise Metal Products - NY 0-10 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Enterprise Metal Products (NY.0-10 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Brooklyn , New York NY.0-10-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.0-10-1 Site Operations: Machined magnesium metal NY.0-10-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination remote NY.0-10-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: None Indicated Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: None Indicated

  6. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- West Valley Demonstration Project - NY

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    23 Valley Demonstration Project - NY 23 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: West Valley Demonstration Project (NY.23) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see http://www.em.doe.gov/SiteInfo/westvalleydemoproject.aspx Documents Related to West Valley Demonstration Project

  7. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Linde Air Products Division - NY 08

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Division - NY 08 FUSRAP Considered Sites Linde Air Products Division - Towanda, NY Alternate Name(s): Praxair Linde Aire Products Div. of Union Carbide Corp. Linde Ceramics Plant Uranium Refinery, Linde Site NY.08-4 Location: East Park Drive and Woodward, Tonawanda, New York NY.08-5 Historical Operations: Processed uranium compounds for MED and AEC. Includes Towanda Landfill as a VP. NY.08-1 NY.08-2 Eligibility Determination: Eligible NY.08-9 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Surveys NY.08-3

  8. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Radium Chemical Co Inc - NY 60

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Radium Chemical Co Inc - NY 60 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: RADIUM CHEMICAL CO., INC (NY.60 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: New York , New York NY.60-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.60-1 Site Operations: Commercial Producer of Radium. NY.60-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Commercial site - EPA cleanup project NY.60-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes NY.60-1 Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radium NY.60-1

  9. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Eastman Kodak Laboratory - NY 0-09

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Eastman Kodak Laboratory - NY 0-09 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Eastman Kodak Laboratory (NY.0-09 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Eastman Kodak Rochester Lab NY.0-09-1 Location: Rochester , New York NY.0-09-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.0-09-1 NY.0-09-2 Site Operations: Research and development with natural uranium solutions in 1943. NY.0-09-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination remote NY.0-09-2 Radioactive

  10. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Ferro Metal and Chemical Co - NY 42

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Ferro Metal and Chemical Co - NY 42 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Ferro Metal & Chemical Co. (NY.42 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 50 Broad Street , New York , New York NY.42-1 NY.42-2 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.42-2 Site Operations: Procured uranium from foreign sources. No record of radioactive material at this site NY.42-1 NY.42-2 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No indication that radioactive materials were used at

  11. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Floyd Bennett Field - NY 0-11

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Floyd Bennett Field - NY 0-11 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Floyd Bennett Field (NY.0-11 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Naval Air Station NY.0-11-1 Location: Buildings 67 and 69 , Brooklyn , New York NY.0-11-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.0-11-1 Site Operations: The Air station was considered by the AEC but was not used. NY.0-11-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No involvement with MED/AEC operations NY.0-11-1 Radioactive Materials

  12. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Union Mines Development Corp - NY 0-22

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Mines Development Corp - NY 0-22 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: UNION MINES DEVELOPMENT CORP. (NY.0-22) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Union Carbide NY.0-22-1 Location: New York , New York NY.0-22-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.0-22-1 Site Operations: The company owned uranium mines or reserves located in the western U.S. NY.0-22-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No reason to believe radioactive material was used at this site NY.0-22-1

  13. NY-Sun Commerical/Industrial Incentive Program

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) through NY-Sun Commercial/Industrial Incentive Program (PON 3082) provides incentives for installation of non-residential new grid...

  14. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Colonie - NY 06

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    of Engineers but will eventually transfer to the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management. NY.06-1 - DOE Report (DOEOR20722-53); Colonie Interim Storage Site...

  15. New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Albany, NY |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Albany, NY New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Albany, NY This presentation on the NYSERDA Hydrogen Program was given on July 12, 2006. PDF icon education_presentation_nyserda.pdf More Documents & Publications State of the States: Fuel Cells in America 2014 State of the States: Fuel Cells in America 2010 New York State-wide Alternative Fuel Vehicle Program for Vehicles and Fueling

  16. Los Alamos technology to be featured on CSI: NY

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    LANL technology featured on CSI: NY Los Alamos technology to be featured on CSI: NY The multipurpose "sampler gun" rapidly collects and tracks radiological, chemical, and biological samples in solid, liquid, or gaseous forms. March 27, 2008 Los Alamos National Laboratory sits on top of a once-remote mesa in northern New Mexico with the Jemez mountains as a backdrop to research and innovation covering multi-disciplines from bioscience, sustainable energy sources, to plasma physics and

  17. QER Public Meeting in New York, NY: Energy Infrastructure Finance |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy York, NY: Energy Infrastructure Finance QER Public Meeting in New York, NY: Energy Infrastructure Finance Meeting Date and Location New York University Kimmel Center for University Life Room 914 60 Washington Square South New York, New York 10010 Meeting Information Agenda: Energy Infrastructure Finance Click Here to comment on the Energy Infrastructure Finance public meeting. Click here to watch a video of the meeting. . See links below to download PDFs of the meeting

  18. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Pfohl Brothers Landfill - NY 66

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Pfohl Brothers Landfill - NY 66 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Pfohl Brothers Landfill (NY.66 ) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see Five-Year Review Report Pfohl Brothers Landfill Superfund Site Erie County Town of Cheektowaga, New York EPA REGION 2 Congressional District(s): 30 Erie Cheektowaga NPL LISTING HISTORY Documents

  19. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Wilson Warehouse - NY 64

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Wilson Warehouse - NY 64 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Wilson Warehouse (NY.64) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: This site is one of a group of 77 FUSRAP considered sites for which few, if any records are available in their respective site files to provide an historical account of past operations and their relationship, if any,

  20. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Ithaca Gun Co Inc - NY 53

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Ithaca Gun Co Inc - NY 53 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: ITHACA GUN CO., INC. (NY.53 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 123 Lake Street , Ithaca , New York NY.53-1 Evaluation Year: 1994 NY.53-2 Site Operations: Conducted tests involving the forging of hollow uranium billets into tubes for the AEC. Also investigated alternative methods of producing fuel cores. NY.53-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No radioactive

  1. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Utica Street Warehouse - NY 0-23

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Street Warehouse - NY 0-23 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: UTICA STREET WAREHOUSE (NY.0-23) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 240 West Utica Street , Buffalo , New York NY.0-23-2 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.0-23-1 Site Operations: Stored and rebarrelled uranium process residues from operations at Linde. NY.0-23-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Original building demolished. Current land use - Parking facility. Potential for

  2. F-1 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Annual Energy Outlook...

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Central West North Central East North Central Mountain AK WA MT WY ID NV UT CO AZ NM TX OK IA KS MO IL IN KY TN MS AL FL GA SC NC WV PA NJ MD DE NY CT VT ME RI MA NH VA WI MI OH...

  3. F-5 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Annual Energy Outlook...

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Figure F4. Oil and Gas Supply Model Regions Atlantic WA MT WY ID NV UT CO AZ NM TX OK IA KS MO IL IN KY TN MS AL FL GA SC NC WV PA NJ MD DE NY CT ME RI MA NH VA WI MI OH NE...

  4. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Frederick Flader Inc - NY 0-13

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Frederick Flader Inc - NY 0-13 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Frederick Flader, Inc. (NY.0-13 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Frederick Flader Division of Eaton Manufacturing Co. NY.0-13-1 Location: 583 Division Street , N. Tonawanda , New York NY.0-13-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.0-13-1 Site Operations: Provided consulting services and supported development of auxiliary equipment related to nuclear power NY.0-13-1 Site Disposition:

  5. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Long Island College of Medicine - NY

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    0-14 Long Island College of Medicine - NY 0-14 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Long Island College of Medicine (NY.0-14 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: New York , New York NY.0-14-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.0-14-1 Site Operations: Performed research utilizing small quantities of radioactive materials in a controlled environment. NY.0-14-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination remote NY.0-14-1

  6. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Lucius Pitkin - NY 0-15

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Lucius Pitkin - NY 0-15 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Lucius Pitkin (NY.0-15 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 47 Fulton Street , New York , New York NY.0-15-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.0-15-1 Site Operations: No MED or AED work done at this site. Contractor supervised activities at Middlesex Sampling Plant in Middlesex, NJ such as assaying, sampling and weighing of ore. NY.0-15-1 NY.0-15-2 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No

  7. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Memorial Hospital - NY 0-16

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Memorial Hospital - NY 0-16 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: MEMORIAL HOSPITAL (NY.0-16 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: New York , New York NY.0-16-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.0-16-1 Site Operations: Conducted studies for MED including a "Physiological Study of Sunbath Treatments." Involvement with radioactive materials unknown. NY.0-16-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination remote NY.0-16-1

  8. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Pyroferric Co - NY 0-20

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Pyroferric Co - NY 0-20 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: PYROFERRIC CO. (NY.0-20) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 621 E. 216th Street , New York , New York NY.0-20-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.0-20-1 Site Operations: One small scale experiment was conducted with non-radioactive material. NY.0-20-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated NY.0-20-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: No Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: None Radiological

  9. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- African Metals - NY 0-01

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    African Metals - NY 0-01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: African Metals (NY 0-01) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Afrimet NY.0-01-1 Location: 41 Broad Street , New York , New York NY.0-01-2 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.0-01-1 Site Operations: U.S. Agent for Union Miniere du Haut Katanga; site of the main corporate offices; no radioactive materials handled at this location. NY.0-01-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No potential for

  10. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Allegheny-Ludlum Steel Corp - NY 0-02

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    NY 0-02 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: ALLEGHENY-LUDLUM STEEL CORP. (NY.0-02 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Al-Tech Specialty Steel NY.0-02-1 Location: Watervliet and Dunkirk , New York NY.0-02-1 Evaluation Year: 1985 NY.0-02-2 Site Operations: Processed uranium metal for the AEC in the early 1950s; rolled uranium billets into rods. NY.0-02-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination remote - Confirmed by radiological

  11. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Colorado Fuel and Iron - NY 0-08

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Fuel and Iron - NY 0-08 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Colorado Fuel and Iron (NY.0-08 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Watervliet , New York NY.0-08-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.0-08-1 Site Operations: Site was a contractor to DuPont. Exact nature of operations is not clear. No records to indicate that radioactive materials were handled at the site. NY.0-08-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated NY.0-08-1 Radioactive Materials

  12. REPLY TO Al-TN OF: EM-421 SUBJECT:

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ;;;;!r;; c"/ I%- , 2.1 + 2- llnited States Government Department of Energy memorandum Fw?fw --&a Gt3 .I\ DATE: Af'R 8 1991 REPLY TO Al-TN OF: EM-421 SUBJECT: Elimination of the Magnus Brass Manufacturing Company from FUSRAP TO: The File The Magnus Brass Manufacturing Company Sites are hereby eliminated from consideration in the Department of Energy's Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). The Department of Energy does not have the authority under the Atomic Energy Act

  13. Champlain, NY Natural Gas Liquefied Natural Gas Imports (Million Cubic

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Feet) (Million Cubic Feet) Champlain, NY Natural Gas Liquefied Natural Gas Imports (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014 63 2015 1 2 1 2 20 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 2/29/2016 Next Release Date: 3/31/2016 Referring Pages: U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Imports by Point of Entry Champlain, NY LNG Imports from All Countries

  14. Submit Your Ideas for the NY Energy Data Jam | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Submit Your Ideas for the NY Energy Data Jam Submit Your Ideas for the NY Energy Data Jam June 19, 2013 - 11:03am Q&A What idea would you present at the Data Jam? Join the...

  15. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Utica Drop Forge and Tool Corp - NY 39

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Drop Forge and Tool Corp - NY 39 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: UTICA DROP FORGE & TOOL CORP. (NY.39) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Utica , New York NY.39-1 Evaluation Year: 1994 NY.39-2 Site Operations: Interest expressed by Utica Drop Forge & Tool Corporation to Conduct Uranium Forging and Casting for the AEC. No indication that the contractor actually did a substantial amount of work of this nature at

  16. Interoperability of Demand Response Resources Demonstration in NY

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Wellington, Andre

    2014-03-31

    The Interoperability of Demand Response Resources Demonstration in NY (Interoperability Project) was awarded to Con Edison in 2009. The objective of the project was to develop and demonstrate methodologies to enhance the ability of customer sited Demand Response resources to integrate more effectively with electric delivery companies and regional transmission organizations.

  17. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Wolff-Alport and Co - NY 30

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Wolff-Alport and Co - NY 30 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Wolff-Alport and Co (NY.30) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP - Referred to US EPA Region II and New York City Department of Health Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 1127 Irving Avenue , Brooklyn , New York NY.30-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.30-1 Site Operations: Commercial operation -- sold thorium residues to the AEC, which in turn shipped the residues to Maywood for storage. NY.30-2 Site Disposition:

  18. DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: Greenhill Contracting, New Paltz, NY

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    | Department of Energy New Paltz, NY DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: Greenhill Contracting, New Paltz, NY DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: Greenhill Contracting, New Paltz, NY Case study of a DOE Zero Energy Ready home in New Paltz, NY, that achieved a HERS score of 37 without PV or 7 with 7.5-kW PV. The two-story 2,288-ft2 home is one of 9 certified homes. All of the homes have R-22 ICF walls, R-20 closed-cell spray foam under the slab, a ground-source heat pump with

  19. I?raak Nuke, NXOO Leaa Km&l, NY00

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    W. ti. &&n,Nor I?raak Nuke, NXOO Leaa Km&l, NY00 fjlrt~olfloatlon Camad .- ,' I i 2 Jr,' ; !

  20. Reservoir fracture mapping using microearthquakes: Austin chalk, Giddings field, TX and 76 field, Clinton Co., KY

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Phillips, W.S.; Rutledge, J.T.; Gardner, T.L.; Fairbanks, T.D.; Miller, M.E.; Schuessler, B.K.

    1996-11-01

    Patterns of microearthquakes detected downhole defined fracture orientation and extent in the Austin chalk, Giddings field, TX and the 76 field, Clinton Co., KY. We collected over 480 and 770 microearthquakes during hydraulic stimulation at two sites in the Austin chalk, and over 3200 during primary production in Clinton Co. Data were of high enough quality that 20%, 31% and 53% of the events could be located, respectively. Reflected waves constrained microearthquakes to the stimulated depths at the base of the Austin chalk. In plan view, microearthquakes defined elongate fracture zones extending from the stimulation wells parallel to the regional fracture trend. However, widths of the stimulated zones differed by a factor of five between the two Austin chalk sites, indicating a large difference in the population of ancillary fractures. Post-stimulation production was much higher from the wider zone. At Clinton Co., microearthquakes defined low-angle, reverse-fault fracture zones above and below a producing zone. Associations with depleted production intervals indicated the mapped fractures had been previously drained. Drilling showed that the fractures currently contain brine. The seismic behavior was consistent with poroelastic models that predicted slight increases in compressive stress above and below the drained volume.

  1. FIRST Robotics at NY Tech Valley | GE Global Research

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Pit Boss Reflects on Bot Challenge Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window) Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Click to share (Opens in new window) Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Pit Boss Reflects on Bot Challenge Lynn DeRose 2015.03.27 Hi everyone, from BBQ to robots all in the same week! This past weekend I had the privilege to volunteer at the FIRST(tm) Robotics Competition (FRC) NY Tech Valley Regional at RPI.

  2. Champlain, NY Natural Gas Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Canada

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    (Million Cubic Feet) Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Canada (Million Cubic Feet) Champlain, NY Natural Gas Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Canada (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014 63 2015 1 2 1 2 20 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 2/29/2016 Next Release Date: 3/31/2016 Referring Pages: U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas

  3. Microsoft PowerPoint - Xie_twpice_NY06.ppt

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Variational Analysis of Tropical Warm Pool International Cloud Experiment (TWP_ICE) Data (01/22/2006 - 2/13/2006) The TWP_ICE Workshop , NASA/GISS, New York, NY, 13-15 November, 2006 A joint effort between LLNL (Xie, McCoy, Klein), BMRC (Hume, Jakob), SUNYSB (Zhang), and other TWPICE participants 143km 130km 172km 99km 148km A Quick Update Done! 3-hourly radiosondes (6 stations) Background field from the ECMWF analysis Radar precipitation Surface turbulence fluxes from Monash University (Darwin

  4. File:USDA-CE-Production-GIFmaps-TN.pdf | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    TN.pdf Jump to: navigation, search File File history File usage Tennessee Ethanol Plant Locations Size of this preview: 776 600 pixels. Full resolution (1,650 1,275...

  5. Y-12 and East TN Public Broadcasting System ? A Nuclear Family...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    - A Nuclear Family Video Miniseries The fourth and final episode of A Nuclear Family: Y-12 National Security Complex documentary film miniseries is complete and East TN PBS is...

  6. Summary - Environmental Management Waste Management Facility (EMWMF) at Oak Ridge, TN

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Oak Ridge, TN EM Project: EM Waste Management Facility ETR Report Date: February 2008 ETR-11 United States Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM) External Technical Review of Environmental Management Waste Management Facility (EMWMF) at Oak Ridge, TN Why DOE-EM Did This Review The Environmental Management Waste Management Facility (EMWMF) is a land disposal facility for wastes generated by environmental restoration activities being conducted at the US Department of

  7. Summary - Major Risk Factors Integrated Facility Disposition Project (IFDP) Oak Ridge, TN

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    & ORNL, Oak Ridge, TN EM Project: Integrated Facility Disposition Project (IFDP) ETR Report Date: August 2008 ETR-15 United States Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM) External Technical Review of the Major Risk Factors Integrated Facility Disposition Project (IFDP) Oak Ridge, TN Why DOE-EM Did This Review Approximately two million pounds of mercury are unaccounted for at Y-12 and mercury contamination has been detected in both soils and groundwater. The IFDP will

  8. Solar Hot Water Market Development in Knoxville, TN | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Information Resources » Solar Hot Water Market Development in Knoxville, TN Solar Hot Water Market Development in Knoxville, TN Assessment of local solar hot water markets, market variables, market barriers, and suggested strategies to increase solar hot water deployment in the city and county. Location Knoxville, Tennessee United States See map: Google Maps Date October 2010 Topic Financing, incentives & Market Analysis Subprogram Soft Cost Author CH2M Hill PDF icon

  9. DOE-NNSA and State of TN Participate in Regional CAPSTONE Exercise | Y-12

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    National Security Complex DOE-NNSA and State of TN ... DOE-NNSA and State of TN Participate in Regional CAPSTONE Exercise Posted: June 2, 2014 - 8:21am The U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration's Radiological Assistance Program, and the State of Tennessee's Offices of Emergency Management & Division of Radiological Health will participate in a Regional CAPSTONE exercise with activities to be conducted by Field Monitoring Teams in the public sector on

  10. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion Plant - TN

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    02 Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion Plant - TN 02 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion Plant (TN.02 ) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see http://www.mbe.doe.gov/me70/manhattan/come_through.htm Documents Related to Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion Plant

  11. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Union Carbide and Carbon Co - TN 10

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Carbide and Carbon Co - TN 10 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Union Carbide and Carbon Co (TN.10) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: This site is one of a group of 5 FUSRAP considered sites for which records are available that provide a reasonably complete historical account of their operations and relationship, if any, with MED/AEC

  12. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- W R Grace - Erwin - TN 05

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    - Erwin - TN 05 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: W R Grace - Erwin (TN.05) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: This site is one of a group of 5 FUSRAP considered sites for which records are available that provide a reasonably complete historical account of their operations and relationship, if any, with MED/AEC operations. However,

  13. EA-2014: Emergency Operations Center Project; Oak Ridge, TN | Department of

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Energy 4: Emergency Operations Center Project; Oak Ridge, TN EA-2014: Emergency Operations Center Project; Oak Ridge, TN Summary In this Environmental Assessment (EA), the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) proposes to design and build a new emergency response facility to support the Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12) missions. The proposed action would consolidate the Plant Shift Superintendent's (PSS) Office, the Emergency Command Center (ECC), the Technical Support Center

  14. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory - NY 16

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory - NY 16 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (NY.16) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see http://www.knollslab.com/ Documents Related to Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory

  15. DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: AquaZephyr, Ithaca, NY | Department

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    of Energy AquaZephyr, Ithaca, NY DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: AquaZephyr, Ithaca, NY Case study of a DOE Zero Energy Ready home in Ithaca, NY, that achieves a HERS 56 without PV or HERS 15 with 4-kW of PV. The two-story, 1,664-ft2 home is one of 17 single-family and 4 duplex homes built as part of an energy-efficient cooperative. The homes have very simple designs and achieve the Passive House Standard with double-stud walls filled with R-22 closed-cell spray foam plus R-30 blown

  16. Summary - Mitigation and Remediation of Mercury Contamination at the Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge, TN

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Oak Ridge, TN EM Project: Mitigation/Remediation of Hg ETR Report Date: April 2008 ETR-13 United States Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM) External Technical Review of the Mitigation and Remediation of Mercury Contamination at the Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge, TN Why DOE-EM Did This Review From 1953 to 1983, ~240,000 pounds of mercury (Hg) were released to the East Fork Popular Creek during the operation of the Y-12 Plant. In 1963, direct systematic releases of mercury

  17. File:USDA-CE-Production-GIFmaps-NY.pdf | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    NY.pdf Jump to: navigation, search File File history File usage New York Ethanol Plant Locations Size of this preview: 776 600 pixels. Full resolution (1,650 1,275 pixels,...

  18. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Pfaltz and Bauer Inc - New York - NY

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    45 New York - NY 45 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Pfaltz and Bauer Inc - New York (NY.45) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: This site is one of a group of 77 FUSRAP considered sites for which few, if any records are available in their respective site files to provide an historical account of past operations and their

  19. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Pier 38 - NY 0-18

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Pier 38 - NY 0-18 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Pier 38 (NY.0-18 ) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: This site is one of a group of 77 FUSRAP considered sites for which few, if any records are available in their respective site files to provide an historical account of past operations and their relationship, if any, with MED/AEC

  20. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- West Milton Reactor Site - NY 21

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Milton Reactor Site - NY 21 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: West Milton Reactor Site (NY.21) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: This site is one of a group of 77 FUSRAP considered sites for which few, if any records are available in their respective site files to provide an historical account of past operations and their

  1. EA-1514: Proposed Conveyance of Parcel ED-6 to the City of Oak Ridge, TN

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This Environmental Assessment was prepared for the conveyance of approximately 336 acres of excess property (i.e., property not needed to fulfill DOE current or foreseeable future requirements) known as Parcel ED-6 to the city of Oak Ridge, TN.

  2. Submit Your Ideas for the NY Energy Data Jam | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Ideas for the NY Energy Data Jam Submit Your Ideas for the NY Energy Data Jam June 19, 2013 - 11:03am Q&A What idea would you present at the Data Jam? Join the Conversation Addthis Applications powered by open energy data were on display at the Energy Datapalooza in June 2012. | Photo by Sarah Gerrity, Energy Department. Applications powered by open energy data were on display at the Energy Datapalooza in June 2012. | Photo by Sarah Gerrity, Energy Department. Alex Cohen Alex Cohen Former

  3. Buffalo, NY Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Canada (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    to Canada (Million Cubic Feet) Buffalo, NY Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Canada (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015 1 1 1 1 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 02/29/2016 Next Release Date: 03/31/2016 Referring Pages: U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports by Point of Exit Buffalo, NY Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Canada

  4. DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: Ithaca Neighborhood Housing Services, Ithaca, NY

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Case study of a DOE Zero Energy Ready Home in Ithaca, NY, that scored HERS 50 without PV. These 1,160-square-foot affordable town houses have R-20 advance framed walls, R-52 blown cellulose in attic, radiant heat with 92.5 AFUE boiler, and triple-pane windows.

  5. SGDP Report Now Available: Interoperability of Demand Response Resources Demonstration in NY (February 2015)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Interoperability of Demand Response Resources Demonstration in NY was awarded to Con Edison in 2009 as part of DOE's Smart Grid Demonstration Project (SGDP) grants funded by the Recovery Act. The objective of the project was to develop and demonstrate methodologies to enhance the ability of customer sited demand response resources, both conventional and renewable, to integrate more effectively with electric delivery companies

  6. DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: AquaZephyr, Ithaca, NY

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Case study of a DOE Zero Energy Ready home in Ithaca, NY, that achieves a HERS 56 without PV or HERS 15 with 4-kW of PV. The two-story, 1,664-ft2 home is one of 17 single-family and 4 duplex homes...

  7. DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: Greenhill Contracting, New Paltz, NY

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Case study of a DOE Zero Energy Ready home in New Paltz, NY, that achieved a HERS score of 37 without PV or 7 with 7.5-kW PV. The two-story 2,288-ft2 home is one of 9 certified homes. All of the...

  8. II United States Government DATE: REPLY TO Al-TN OF: SUBJECT:

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    r.@& * EFG (07-W,' . II United States Government DATE: REPLY TO Al-TN OF: SUBJECT: TO: EM-421 (W. A. W illiams, 903-8149) Authorization for Remedial Action at the Former Baker Brothers Inc. Site, Toledo, Ohio Manager, DOE Oak Ridge Field Office This is to notify you that the Former Baker Brothers, Inc. site in Toledo, Ohio, is designated for remedial action under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). This notification does not constitute a FUSRAP baseline change

  9. TEAM CUMBERLAND Tennessee Valley Authority 400 West Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville, TN 37902

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    TEAM CUMBERLAND Tennessee Valley Authority 400 West Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville, TN 37902 March 24 & 25, 2015 On Tuesday, March 24 th , at 1:00 PM EST, in a conference room located TVA's West Tower, an analysis of Corps O&M expenditures will be discussed. At 3:00 PM EST, TVA will provide a tour of their River Scheduling Operations Center. Afterward, we'll meet in the Knoxville Marriott lobby at 6:15 PM EST and depart for Calhoun's for dinner (Dutch-treat). The meeting on Wednesday,

  10. REPLY TO AlTN OF: W-421 (W. A. W

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    QOEF 13254 i.3891 EFG iO7W United- states Government bemoranduin DATE: f-!uG 3, 9 19g4 REPLY TO AlTN OF: W-421 (W. A. W illiams, 427-1719) SUBJECT: Elimination of the Sites from Program the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action To' The File In 1990, with the assistance of Mr. reviewed a number of sites that had services to the Fernald facility as . _ Doug Tonkay and Us. Michelle Landis, I formerly provided goods and/or subcontractors. For 24 of .these B. . sites, recoaaaendations were made to

  11. DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: Ferguson Design and Construction Inc., Sagaponack, NY, Custom Home

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Case study of a DOE Zero Energy Ready Home in Long Island, NY, that scored HERS 43 without PV. This 5,088-square-foot custom home has R-25 double-stud walls, a vaulted roof with R-40 blown cellulose, R-10 XPS under slab, a hydro air system with 91% efficient boiler for forced air and radiant floor heat, and 100% LED lights.

  12. DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study 2013: Ferguson Design and Construction, Inc., Sagaponak, NY

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Ferguson Design & Construction, Inc. Sagaponack, NY BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES OFFICE The U.S. Department of Energy invites home builders across the country to meet the extraordinary levels of excellence and quality specifi ed in DOE's Zero Energy Ready Home program (formerly known as Challenge Home). Every DOE Zero Energy ReadyHome starts with ENERGY STAR for Homes Version 3 for an energy-effi cient home built on a solid foundation of building science research. Advanced technologies are designed

  13. DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study 2013: Ithaca Neighborhood Housing Services, Ithaca, NY

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Ithaca Neighborhood Housing Services Ithaca, NY BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES OFFICE The U.S. Department of Energy invites home builders across the country to meet the extraordinary levels of excellence and quality specifi ed in DOE's Zero Energy Ready Home program (formerly known as Challenge Home). Every DOE Zero Energy Ready Home starts with ENERGY STAR for Homes Version 3 for an energy-effi cient home built on a solid foundation of building science research. Advanced technologies are designed in to

  14. Identification of multiple mercury sources to stream sediments near Oak Ridge, TN, USA

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Donovan, Patrick M.; Blum, Joel D.; Demers, Jason D.; Gu, Baohua; Brooks, Scott C.; Peryam, John

    2014-03-03

    In this paper, sediments were analyzed for total Hg concentration (THg) and isotopic composition from streams and rivers in the vicinity of the Y-12 National Security Complex (Y12) in Oak Ridge, TN (USA). In the stream directly draining Y12, where industrial releases of mercury (Hg) have been documented, high THg (3.26 to 60.1 ?g/g) sediments had a distinct Hg isotopic composition (?202Hg of 0.02 0.15 and ?199Hg of -0.07 0.03; mean 1SD, n=12) compared to sediments from relatively uncontaminated streams in the region (?202Hg = -1.40 0.06 and ?199Hg of 0.26 0.03; mean 1SD, n=6). Additionally, several streams that are nearby but do not drain Y12 had sediments with intermediate THg (0.06 to 0.21 ?g/g) and anomalous ?202Hg (as low as -5.07). We suggest that the low ?202Hg values in these sediments provide evidence for the contribution of an additional Hg source to sediments, possibly derived from atmospheric deposition. In sediments directly downstream of Y12 this third Hg source is not discernible and the Hg isotopic composition can be largely explained by the mixing of low THg sediments with high THg sediments contaminated by Y12 discharges.

  15. Nitrogen effects on crystallization kinetics of amorphous TiOxNy thin films

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hukari, Kyle; Dannenberg, Rand; Stach, E.A.

    2001-03-30

    The crystallization behavior of amorphous TiOxNy (x>>y) thin films was investigated by in-situ transmission electron microscopy. The Johnson-Mehl-Avrami-Kozolog (JMAK) theory is used to determine the Avrami exponent, activation energy, and the phase velocity pre-exponent. Addition of nitrogen inhibits diffusion, increasing the nucleation temperature, while decreasing the growth activation energy. Kinetic variables extracted from individual crystallites are compared to JMAK analysis of the fraction transformed and a change of 6 percent in the activation energy gives agreement between the methods. From diffraction patterns and index of refraction the crystallized phase was found to be predominantly anatase.

  16. DOE Zero Ready Home Case Study: AquaZephyr, Eco-Vilage Ithaca, Ithaca NY

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    AquaZephyr Eco-Village Ithaca Ithaca, NY DOE ZERO ENERGY READY HOME(tm) The U.S. Department of Energy invites home builders across the country to meet the extraordinary levels of excellence and quality specified in DOE's Zero Energy Ready Home program (formerly known as Challenge Home). Every DOE Zero Energy Ready Home starts with ENERGY STAR Certified Homes Version 3.0 for an energy-efficient home built on a solid foundation of building science research. Advanced technologies are designed in to

  17. DOE Zero Ready Home Case Study: Greenhill Contracting, The Preserve, New Paltz, NY

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    The Preserve New Paltz, NY DOE ZERO ENERGY READY HOME(tm) The U.S. Department of Energy invites home builders across the country to meet the extraordinary levels of excellence and quality specified in DOE's Zero Energy Ready Home program (formerly known as Challenge Home). Every DOE Zero Energy Ready Home starts with ENERGY STAR Certified Homes Version 3.0 for an energy-efficient home built on a solid foundation of building science research. Advanced technologies are designed in to give you

  18. CRANE CO. 757 THIRD AVENUE NEW YORK. N.Y. THOMAS UNGERLAND ASSOCIATE GENERAL COUNSEL

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ? z _ - c 0-e . CRANE CO. 757 THIRD AVENUE NEW YORK. N.Y. THOMAS UNGERLAND ASSOCIATE GENERAL COUNSEL December 14, 1987 James J. Fiore Director Office of Nuclear Energy Department of Energy Washington, D.C. Re: Crane - Indian Orchard Dear M r. Fiore: W e acknowledge receipt of your letter to Paul Hundt, dated September 29, 1987, which requests certain information about Crane's plant site in Indian Orchard, Massachusetts. The plant is not currently operating. Crane was unable to locate any records

  19. Print

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    < 5k 0 < 50k < 100k < 250k < 500k < 1M > 1M > 5M > 10M DE MD DC MA RI NJ AZ UT WY ID OR WA CA TX OK KS CO NE SD ND MN WI IL IA MO AR LA MS AL FL GA TN KY IN OH MI ME NH CT VT NY PA WV VA NC SC MT AK HI NV NM Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Procured Materials and Services 2015 (> $35M) Small business procurements in US: $14.73M

  20. Annual Energy Outlook 2015 - Appendix B

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    5 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Annual Energy Outlook 2015 Regional maps Figure F4. Oil and gas supply model regions F-5 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Annual Energy Outlook 2014 Regional maps Figure F4. Oil and gas supply model regions Figure F4. Oil and Gas Supply Model Regions Atlantic WA MT WY ID NV UT CO AZ NM OK IA KS MO IL IN KY TN MS AL FL GA SC NC WV PA NJ MD DE NY CT ME RI MA NH VA WI MI OH NE SD MN ND AR OR CA VT East (1) Gulf of Mexico LA Gulf Coast (2)

  1. Annual Energy Outlook 2015 - Appendix F

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    1 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Annual Energy Outlook 2015 Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Office of Energy Analysis. U.S. Energy Information Administration / Annual Energy Outlook 2010 213 Appendix F Regional Maps Figure F1. United States Census Divisions Pacific South Atlantic Middle Atlantic New England West South Central West North Central East North Central Mountain AK WA MT WY ID NV UT CO AZ NM TX OK IA KS MO IL IN KY TN MS AL FL GA SC NC WV PA NJ MD DE NY CT VT

  2. Annual Energy Outlook 2015 - Appendix F

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    7 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Annual Energy Outlook 2015 Regional maps Figure F6. Coal supply regions WA ID OR CA NV UT TX OK AR MO LA MS AL GA FL TN SC NC KY VA WV WY CO SD ND MI MN WI IL IN OH MD PA NJ DE CT MA NH VT NY ME RI MT NE IA KS MI AZ NM 500 0 SCALE IN MILES APPALACHIA Northern Appalachia Central Appalachia Southern Appalachia INTERIOR NORTHERN GREAT PLAINS Eastern Interior Western Interior Gulf Lignite Dakota Lignite Western Montana Wyoming, Northern Powder River Basin

  3. padd map

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    FL PADD 4: Rocky Mountain PADD 5: West Coast PADD 2: Midwest PADD 1: East Coast PADD 3: Gulf Coast PADD1A: New England PADD1B: Central Atlantic PADD1C: Lower Atlantic Petroleum Administration for Defense Districts AK HI WA OR CA NV AZ MT WY CO UT ID ND SD NE KS OK MO MN WI MI IL IN OH KY TN IA NM TX AR LA AL MS WV VA NC SC GA FL ME NH VT NY PA NJ MD DE MA CT RI

  4. DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Overview

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    DOE Hydrogen & Fuel Cell Overview Dr. Sunita Satyapal Program Manager U.S. Department of Energy Fuel Cell Technologies Program DOE/CESA/TTC Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Webinar December 14, 2010 2 Examples of DOE-funded Partners and Locations - Fuel Cell Technologies Program TX NM AZ NC AR CA CO HI WA IL KY MA MN MO MS AL NV TN UT WV ID FL MI ND OR OH IN MT WY IO NE KS OK AK LA GA WI SC VA PA DE MD DC NJ NY RI CT VT NH ME SD Source: US DOE 12/2010 2 3 Fuel Cells: Addressing Energy Challenges 4

  5. Buildings Energy Data Book: 3.9 Educational Facilities

    Buildings Energy Data Book [EERE]

    6 2010 Regional New Construction and Renovations Expenditures for Public K-12 Schools ($Million) Region New Schools Additions Renovation Total Region 1 (CT, MA, ME, NH, RI, VT) Region 2 (NJ, NY, PA) Region 3 (DE, MD, VA, WV) Region 4 (KY, NC, SC, TN) Region 5 (AL, FL, GA, MS) Region 6 (IN, MI, OH) Region 7 (IL, MN, WI) Region 8 (IA, KS, MO, NE) Region 9 (AR, LA, OK, TX) Region 10 (CO, MT, ND, NM, SD, UT, WY) Region 11 (AZ, CA, HI, NV) Region 12 (AK, ID, OR, WA) Total Source(s): School Planning

  6. Identification of multiple mercury sources to stream sediments near Oak Ridge, TN, USA

    DOE Public Access Gateway for Energy & Science Beta (PAGES Beta)

    Donovan, Patrick M.; Blum, Joel D.; Demers, Jason D.; Gu, Baohua; Brooks, Scott C.; Peryam, John

    2014-03-03

    In this paper, sediments were analyzed for total Hg concentration (THg) and isotopic composition from streams and rivers in the vicinity of the Y-12 National Security Complex (Y12) in Oak Ridge, TN (USA). In the stream directly draining Y12, where industrial releases of mercury (Hg) have been documented, high THg (3.26 to 60.1 μg/g) sediments had a distinct Hg isotopic composition (δ202Hg of 0.02 ± 0.15‰ and Δ199Hg of -0.07 ± 0.03‰; mean ± 1SD, n=12) compared to sediments from relatively uncontaminated streams in the region (δ202Hg = -1.40 ± 0.06‰ and Δ199Hg of –0.26 ± 0.03‰; mean ± 1SD,more » n=6). Additionally, several streams that are nearby but do not drain Y12 had sediments with intermediate THg (0.06 to 0.21 μg/g) and anomalous δ202Hg (as low as -5.07‰). We suggest that the low δ202Hg values in these sediments provide evidence for the contribution of an additional Hg source to sediments, possibly derived from atmospheric deposition. In sediments directly downstream of Y12 this third Hg source is not discernible and the Hg isotopic composition can be largely explained by the mixing of low THg sediments with high THg sediments contaminated by Y12 discharges.« less

  7. Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board * P.O. Box 2001, EM-91, Oak Ridge, TN 37831

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    April 12, 2012 Susan Cange Acting Manager for Environmental Management DOE-Oak Ridge Office P.O. Box 2001, EM-90 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Dear Ms. Cange: Recommendation # 209: Recommendation on Fiscal Year 2014 DOE Oak Ridge Environmental Management Budget Request At our April 11, 2012, meeting the Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board approved the enclosed recommendation regarding the FY 2014 DOE-Oak Ridge Environmental Management Budget Request. The board's Environmental Management Budget &

  8. The origin and fate of the sediments composing a migrating dune field, Amagansett, NY

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Maher, T. (Suffolk Community Coll., Selden, NY (United States). Environmental Science Dept.); Kandelin, J. (Suffolk Community Coll., Selden, NY (United States). Dept. of Earth and Space Science); Black, J.A. (Geosciences Inc., Patchogue, NY (United States))

    1993-03-01

    The migrating dune system, located in Amagansett, NY, consists of a series of three parabolic dunes ranging in heights from 10 to 30 meters. The dunes are migrating under the influence of the prevailing winds, in a southeasterly direction. The migration continues until the dunes encounter the countervailing prevailing winds, off the Atlantic Ocean. A series of flow charts have been prepared to indicate the possible sources of sediment for this system. These charts, in conjunction with geomorphic analysis, stratigraphic data and various sediment characteristics indicate that the sediments are transported by coastal currents. Once deposited they form a linear dune system. Eolian transport from this dune then supplies the sediment to the migrating dune system.

  9. Kentucky Department for Natural Resources and Environmental Protection permit application for air contaminant source: SRC-I demonstration plant, Newman, Kentucky. Supplement I. [Additional information on 38 items requested by KY/DNREP

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Pearson, Jr., John F.

    1981-02-13

    In response to a letter from KY/DNREP, January 19, 1981, ICRC and DOE have prepared the enclosed supplement to the Kentucky Department for Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Permit Application for Air Contaminant Source for the SRC-I Demonstration Plant. Each of the 38 comments contained in the letter has been addressed in accordance with the discussions held in Frankfort on January 28, 1981, among representatives of KY/DNREP, EPA Region IV, US DOE, and ICRC. The questions raised involve requests for detailed information on the performance and reliability of proprietary equipment, back-up methods, monitoring plans for various pollutants, composition of wastes to flares, emissions estimates from particular operations, origin of baseline information, mathematical models, storage tanks, dusts, etc. (LTN)

  10. HIA 2015 DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: United Way of Long Island Housing Development Corporation, Patchogue, NY

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Way of Long Island Housing Development Corporation Patchogue, NY DOE ZERO ENERGY READY HOME(tm) The U.S. Department of Energy invites home builders across the country to meet the extraordinary levels of excellence and quality specified in DOE's Zero Energy Ready Home program (formerly known as Challenge Home). Every DOE Zero Energy Ready Home starts with ENERGY STAR Certified Homes Version 3.0 for an energy-efficient home built on a solid foundation of building science research. Advanced

  11. Tn-seq of Caulobacter crescentus under uranium stress reveals genes essential for detoxification and stress tolerance

    DOE Public Access Gateway for Energy & Science Beta (PAGES Beta)

    Yung, Mimi C.; Park, Dan M.; Overton, K. Wesley; Blow, Matthew J.; Hoover, Cindi A.; Smit, John R.; Murray, Sean R.; Ricci, Dante P.; Christen, Beat; Bowman, Grant R.; et al

    2015-07-20

    Ubiquitous aquatic bacterium Caulobacter crescentus is highly resistant to uranium (U) and facilitates U biomineralization and thus holds promise as an agent of U bioremediation. In order to gain an understanding of how C. crescentus tolerates U, we employed transposon (Tn) mutagenesis paired with deep sequencing (Tn-seq) in a global screen for genomic elements required for U resistance. Of the 3,879 annotated genes in the C. crescentus genome, 37 were found to be specifically associated with fitness under U stress, 15 of which were subsequently tested through mutational analysis. Systematic deletion analysis revealed that mutants lacking outer membrane transporters (rsaFamore » and rsaFb), a stress-responsive transcription factor (cztR), or a ppGpp synthetase/hydrolase (spoT) exhibited a significantly lower survival rate under U stress. RsaFa and RsaFb, which are homologues of TolC in Escherichia coli, have previously been shown to mediate S-layer export. Transcriptional analysis revealed upregulation of rsaFa and rsaFb by 4- and 10-fold, respectively, in the presence of U. We additionally show that rsaFa mutants accumulated higher levels of U than the wild type, with no significant increase in oxidative stress levels. These results suggest a function for RsaFa and RsaFb in U efflux and/or maintenance of membrane integrity during U stress. In addition, we present data implicating CztR and SpoT in resistance to U stress. Together, our findings reveal novel gene targets that are key to understanding the molecular mechanisms of U resistance in C. crescentus.« less

  12. Annual Performance Evaluation of a Pair of Energy Efficient Houses (WC3 and WC4) in Oak Ridge, TN

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Biswas, Kaushik; Christian, Jeffrey E; Gehl, Anthony C; Jackson, Roderick K; Boudreaux, Philip R

    2012-04-01

    Beginning in 2008, two pairs of energy-saver houses were built at Wolf Creek in Oak Ridge, TN. These houses were designed to maximize energy efficiency using new ultra-high-efficiency components emerging from ORNL s Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) partners and others. The first two houses contained 3713 square feet of conditioned area and were designated as WC1 and WC2; the second pair consisted of 2721 square feet conditioned area with crawlspace foundation and they re called WC3 and WC4. This report is focused on the annual energy performance of WC3 and WC4, and how they compare against a previously benchmarked maximum energy efficient house of a similar footprint. WC3 and WC4 are both about 55-60% more efficient than traditional new construction. Each house showcases a different envelope system: WC3 is built with advanced framing featured cellulose insulation partially mixed with phase change materials (PCM); and WC4 house has cladding composed of an exterior insulation and finish system (EIFS). The previously benchmarked house was one of three built at the Campbell Creek subdivision in Knoxville, TN. This house (CC3) was designed as a transformation of a builder house (CC1) with the most advanced energy-efficiency features, including solar electricity and hot water, which market conditions are likely to permit within the 2012 2015 period. The builder house itself was representative of a standard, IECC 2006 code-certified, all-electric house built by the builder to sell around 2005 2008.

  13. FY2010 3rd QTR.xls

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    NY NY NV OH TN TN TN TN, WA, CA TN TN TN TX Total Shipments by Route Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Batelle Energy Alliance Idaho National Laboratory Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Energx Argonne National Laboratory Argonne National Laboratory Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant Los Alamos National Laboratory Brookhaven National Laboratory West Valley Environmental Services National Security Technologies, Inc. Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant UT Batelle/Oak Ridge National

  14. HIA 2015 DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: Greenhill Contracting, Green Acres #20, #26, #28, New Paltz, NY

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Green Acres #20, #26, #28 New Paltz, NY DOE ZERO ENERGY READY HOME(tm) The U.S. Department of Energy invites home builders across the country to meet the extraordinary levels of excellence and quality specified in DOE's Zero Energy Ready Home program (formerly known as Challenge Home). Every DOE Zero Energy Ready Home starts with ENERGY STAR Certified Homes Version 3.0 for an energy-efficient home built on a solid foundation of building science research. Advanced technologies are designed in to

  15. FY2011 3rd QTR.xls

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    NM NY NY SC TN TN TN, WA, CA TN TN TN TX Total Shipments by Route Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Batelle Energy Alliance Idaho National Laboratory Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Energx Argonne National Laboratory Argonne National Laboratory Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant Sandia National Laboratory Los Alamos National Laboratory West Valley Environmental Services Brookhaven National Laboratory Savannah River Site Duratek/Energy Solutions Babcox & Wilcox Technical Services

  16. Low-Level & Mixed Low-Level Radioactive Waste Shipments to NNSS, FY2010 2nd QTR

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    NM NY NY NV OH TN TN TN, WA, CA TN TN TN TX Total Shipments by Route Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Batelle Energy Alliance Idaho National Laboratory Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Energx Argonne National Laboratory Argonne National Laboratory Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant Aberdeen Proving Ground Sandia National Laboratories Brookhaven National Laboratory West Valley Environmental Services National Security Technologies, Inc. Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Duratek/Energy

  17. LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE & MIXED WASTE SHIPMENTS TO THE NEVADA NATIONAL SECURITY SITE

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    NV NY NY NV OH TN TN TN, WA, CA TN TN TN TX y ct 2 Plant Perma-Fix LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE & MIXED WASTE SHIPMENTS TO THE NEVADA NATIONAL SECURITY SITE FIRST QUARTER REPORT, FY 2011 (OCTOBER, NOVEMBER, DECEMBER 2010) Livermore National Laboratory ergy Alliance onal Laboratory Mixed Waste Treatment Project gonne National Laboratory ational Laboratory Gaseous Diffusion Plant Proving Ground terra, LLC en National Laboratory y Environmental Services ecurity Technologies, Inc. h Gaseous Diffusion

  18. Microsoft Word - figure_99.doc

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    7 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Natural Gas Annual Figure 6. Natural gas processing in the United States and the Gulf of Mexico, 2014 (million cubic feet) None 1-15,000 15,001-100,000 100,001-200,000 200,001-500,000 500,001 and over Sources: Energy Information Administration (EIA), Form EIA-64A, "Annual Report of the Origin of Natural Gas Liquids Production." IN OH TN WV VA KY MD PA NY VT NH MA CT ME RI DE DC NC SC GA FL NJ AL MS LA MO AR TX NM OK CO KS UT AZ WY NE IL IA MN

  19. Annual Energy Outlook 2015 - Appendix F

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    8 Regional maps Figure F7. Coal demand regions Figure F7. Coal Demand Regions CT,MA,ME,NH,RI,VT OH 1. NE 3. S1 4. S2 5. GF 6. OH 7. EN AL,MS MN,ND,SD IA,NE,MO,KS TX,LA,OK,AR MT,WY,ID CO,UT,NV AZ,NM 9. AM 11. C2 12. WS 13. MT 14. CU 15. ZN WV,MD,DC,DE 2. YP Region Content Region Code NY,PA,NJ VA,NC,SC GA,FL IN,IL,MI,WI Region Content Region Code 14. CU 13. MT 16. PC 15. ZN 12. WS 11. C2 9. AM 5. GF 8. KT 4. S2 7. EN 6. OH 2. YP 1. NE 3. S1 10. C1 KY,TN 8. KT 16. PC AK,HI,WA,OR,CA 10. C1

  20. Word Pro - Untitled1

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    State-Level Energy Consumption Estimates and Estimated Consumption per Capita, 2010 Consumption Consumption per Capita 14 U.S. Energy Information Administration / Annual Energy Review 2011 TX CA FL LA IL OH PA NY GA IN MI NC VA NJ TN WA KY AL MO MN WI SC OK CO IA MD AZ MA MS KS AR OR NE UT CT WV NM NV AK WY ID ND ME MT SD NH HI DE RI DC VT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 0 2 4 6 8 10

  1. FY2010 4th QTR.xls

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    NJ NM NY NV OH TN TN TN TN, WA, CA TN TN TN TX Total Shipments by Route Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Batelle Energy Alliance Idaho National Laboratory Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Energx Argonne National Laboratory Argonne National Laboratory Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Sandia National Laboratory Brookhaven National Laboratory Navarro-Interra, LLC Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant UT Batelle/Oak Ridge National Laboratory Duratek/Energy

  2. Training Session: Buffalo, NY

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This 3.5-hour training provides builders with a comprehensive review of zero energy-ready home construction including the business case, detailed specifications, and opportunities to be recognized...

  3. NY Green Bank

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    capital markets for large scale infrastructure are deep and robust. These markets enjoy economies of scale with low relative transaction costs and well-understood risk. These...

  4. Obama Administration Announces $20 Million for 10 Public-Private Partnerships to Support American Manufacturing and Encourage Investment in the U.S.

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Investments will promote job creation and economic growth in local industry clusters in AZ, CA, MI, NY, OK, OR, PA, TN AND WA

  5. untitled

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    NJ NM NM NV NY OH SC TN TN TN, WA, CA TN TN TN TX Total Shipments by Route Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Batelle Energy Alliance Idaho National Laboratory Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Energx Argonne National Laboratory Argonne National Laboratory Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant Aberdeen Proving Ground Princeton Plasma Physics Lab Sandia National Laboratory Los Alamos National Laboratory National Security Technologies West Valley Environmental Services Portsmouth Gaseous

  6. US ESC TN Site Consumption

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    an average of 79 million Btu per year, about 12% less than the U.S. average. * Average electricity consumption for Tennessee households is 33% higher than the national average...

  7. TN_09-1.pdf

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  8. TN_09-2.pdf

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  9. TN_09-3.pdf

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  10. TN_09-4.pdf

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  11. TN_09-5.pdf

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  12. Source characterization and control technology assessment of methylene chloride emissions from Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY. Final report, July 1988-April 1989

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Walata, S.A.; Rehm, R.M.

    1989-07-01

    This report gives results of an assessment of potential control technologies for methylene chloride (also known as dichloromethane or DCM) emission sources at Eastman Kodak Company's Kodak Park facility in Rochester, NY. DCM is a solvent used by Kodak in the manufacture of cellulose triacetate film support. Work has involved: a plant visit where major DCM emission sources were inspected, and evaluation of current and potential control technologies for the DCM emission sources. The report contains information gathered during the plant visit to the Kodak Park facility. Included are emission estimates determined by Kodak of all emission points greater than 8000 lb (3600 kg)/yr DCM, as well as a description of each point observed during the visit. Also included are results of an evaluation of control technologies that might be applied to the major emission sources. A cost analysis of different add-on control devices is provided for four of the uncontrolled emission points.

  13. Department of Energy Releases the Notice of Intent for the GNEP...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... February 13 Oak Ridge, TN February 15 North Augusta, SC February 22 Joliet, IL February 26 Hobbs, NM February 27 Roswell, NM March 1 Los Alamos, NM March 6 Paducah, KY March 8 ...

  14. Task Order Awarded for Environmental Technical Services

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Cincinnati - The Department of Energy (DOE) today awarded a task order for environmental technical services to Professional Project Services, Inc., of Oak Ridge, TN, for support services at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant located near Paducah, KY.

  15. Natural Gas Heat Pump and Air Conditioner | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Natural Gas Heat Pump and Air Conditioner Natural Gas Heat Pump and Air Conditioner Lead Performer: Thermolift - Stony Brook, NY Partners: -- New York State Energy Research & Development Authority - Albany, NY -- Stony Brook University - Stony Brook, NY -- Oak Ridge National Laboratory - Oak Ridge, TN -- National Grid - Washington, DC -- Applied Thermodynamic Apparatus (ATA) - Ann Arbor, MI -- Fala Technologies - Kingston, NY -- LoDolce - Saugerties, NY DOE Funding: $750,000 Cost Share:

  16. Building America Case Study: Apartment Compartmentalization with an Aerosol-Based Sealing Process - Queens, NY; Technology Solutions for New and Existing Homes, Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    2015-07-01

    Air sealing of building enclosures is a difficult and time-consuming process. Current methods in new construction require laborers to physically locate small and sometimes large holes in multiple assemblies and then manually seal each of them. The innovation demonstrated under this research study was the automated air sealing and compartmentalization of buildings through the use of an aerosolized sealant, developed by the Western Cooling Efficiency Center at University of California Davis.
    CARB sought to demonstrate this new technology application in a multifamily building in Queens, NY. The effectiveness of the sealing process was evaluated by three methods: air leakage testing of overall apartment before and after sealing, point-source testing of individual leaks, and pressure measurements in the walls of the target apartment during sealing. Aerosolized sealing was successful by several measures in this study. Many individual leaks that are labor-intensive to address separately were well sealed by the aerosol particles. In addition, many diffuse leaks that are difficult to identify and treat were also sealed. The aerosol-based sealing process resulted in an average reduction of 71% in air leakage across three apartments and an average apartment airtightness of 0.08 CFM50/SF of enclosure area.

  17. Best Practices Case Study: Urbane Homes - Crestwood, KY, Various Locations, Greater Louisville, KY

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    2011-09-01

    Case study of Urbane Homes, who worked with Building America to build market rate homes with HERS scores of 57 to 62. Despite a down market theyve sold every home within 3 weeks of listing, without any advertising.

  18. NY); Logvenov, Gennady (Port Jefferson Station, NY); Gozar, Adrian...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    50 K and this enhanced superconductivity is also shown to originate from a 1 to 2 unit cell thick interfacial layer. The results demonstrate that engineering artificial...

  19. ZERH Training Session: Syracuse, NY

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The DOE Zero Energy Ready Home is a high performance home which is so energy efficient, that a renewable energy system can offset all or most of its annual energy Consumption.US DOE Zero Energy...

  20. NY_10-13.pdf

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  1. NY_17-18.pdf

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  2. NY_08-10.pdf

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  3. NY_29-4.pdf

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  4. NY_36-3.pdf

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  5. NY_40-1.pdf

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  6. NY_48-1.pdf

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  7. NY_50-2.pdf

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  8. NY_60-1.pdf

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  9. Cancer Facts & Figures - 2010

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    AL 23,640 AZ 29,780 AR 15,320 CA 157,320 CO 21,340 CT 20,750 DE 4,890 FL 107,000 GA 40,480 ID 7,220 IL 63,890 IN 33,020 IA 17,260 KS 13,550 KY 24,240 LA 20,950 ME 8,650 MD 27,700 MA 36,040 MN 25,080 MS 14,330 MO 31,160 MT 5,570 NE 9,230 NV 12,230 NH 7,810 NJ 48,100 NM 9,210 NY 103,340 NC 45,120 ND 3,300 OH 64,450 OK 18,670 OR 20,750 PA 75,260 RI 5,970 SC 23,240 SD 4,220 TN 33,070 TX 101,120 UT 9,970 VT 3,720 VA 36,410 WA 34,500 WV 10,610 WI 29,610 WY 2,540 DC 2,760 HI 6,670 AK 2,860 MI 55,660 PR

  10. TN Energy Efficient Schools Initiative GSHP Program

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Project objectives: Develop methods to make GSHPs more affordable for Tennessee school districts, by innovative design techniques, reducing the up-front cost of the technology, and by providing an innovative method of financing construction. Three school districts have been chosen as test beds for the innovations.

  11. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Annual Coal Report 2013

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Coal Consumers in the Manufacturing and Coke Sectors, 2013 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Annual Coal Report 2013 Table 25. Coal Consumers in the Manufacturing and Coke Sectors, 2013 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Annual Coal Report 2013 Company Name Plant Location Top Ten Manufacturers American Crystal Sugar Co MN, ND Archer Daniels Midland IA, IL, MN, NE Carmeuse Lime Stone Inc AL, IN, KY, MI, OH, PA, TN, WI Cemex Inc AL, CA, CO, FL, GA, KY, OH, TN, TX Dakota Gasification

  12. SAS Output

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    5. Coal Consumers in the Manufacturing and Coke Sectors, 2013" "Company Name","Plant Location" "Top Ten Manufacturers" "American Crystal Sugar Co","MN, ND" "Archer Daniels Midland","IA, IL, MN, NE" "Carmeuse Lime Stone Inc","AL, IN, KY, MI, OH, PA, TN, WI" "Cemex Inc","AL, CA, CO, FL, GA, KY, OH, TN, TX" "Dakota Gasification Company","ND" "Eastman Chemical

  13. BIG SANDY IDA ONEID A WILL IAM SBU RG BU RNIN G SPRIN GS WIN

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    100.1 - 1,000 MMCF 1,000.1 - 10,000 MMCF 10,000.1 - 100,000 MMCF > 100,000 MMCF Appalachian Basin Boundary Appalachian Basin, TN-KY (Panel 7 of 7) Oil and Gas Fields By 2001 Gas

  14. BIG SANDY IDA ONEID A WILL IAM SBU RG BU RNIN G SPRIN GS WIN

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    100.1 - 1,000 MBOE 1,000.1 - 10,000 MBOE 10,000.1 - 100,000 MBOE > 100,000 MBOE Appalachian Basin Boundary Appalachian Basin, TN-KY (Panel 7 of 7) Oil and Gas Fields By 2001 BOE

  15. Waddington, NY Natural Gas Exports to Canada

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    349,980 267,227 231,831 241,506 214,671 187,219 1996-2014 Pipeline Prices 4.60 5.44 4.99 3.87 5.58 8.54...

  16. Massena, NY Natural Gas Exports to Canada

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    2011 2012 2013 2014 View History Pipeline Volumes 0 472 0 0 2011-2014 Pipeline Prices -- 2.96 -- -- 2011...

  17. Energize NY Finance | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Corporation (EIC). The property that is being financed should be current on property tax payments, and must not have any involuntary liens or defaults. Financing...

  18. Massena, NY Natural Gas Exports to Canada

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    5,595 3,965 3,992 4,147 3,819 3,049 1996-2015 Pipeline Prices 6.48 6.55 5.75 6.04 7.34 5.65

  19. Waddington, NY Natural Gas Exports to Canada

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    30,731 38,791 25,121 39,196 8,775 2007-2015 Pipeline Prices -- 4.71 3.42 5.16 5.77 3.58 2007

  20. Acceleration Of Wound Healing Ny Photodynamic Therapy

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Hasan, Tayyaba; Hamblin, Michael R.; Trauner, Kenneth

    2000-08-22

    Disclosed is a method for accelerating wound healing in a mammal. The method includes identifying an unhealed wound site or partially-healed wound site in a mammal; administering a photosensitizer to the mammal; waiting for a time period wherein the photosensitizer reaches an effective tissue concentration at the wound site; and photoactivating the photosensitizer at the wound site. The dose of photodynamic therapy is selected to stimulate the production of one or more growth factor by cells at the wound site, without causing tissue destruction.

  1. Champlain, NY LNG Imports from Canada

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    9,173 8,293 6,766 7,228 4,922 4,446 1996-2015 Pipeline Prices 6.02 6.11 4.50 7.22 13.60 5.57 1996-2015 Liquefied Natural Gas Volumes 0 63 26 2013-2015 Liquefied Natural Gas Prices -- 10.69 8.78 2013

  2. US MidAtl NY Site Consumption

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    consumption in New York homes is much lower than the U.S. average, because many households use other fuels for major energy end uses like space heating, water heating, and cooking. ...

  3. GE Global Research in Niskayuna, NY

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Niskayuna, USA Niskayuna, USA GE Global Research headquarters is the nerve center for innovative work across technologies and collaboration across GE businesses. Click to email...

  4. Microsoft Word - NY.17-16.doc

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 Ms. ... Leithner: This is in reference to the Niagara Falls Storage Site (NFSS) Vicinity ...

  5. Microsoft Word - FUSRAP Colonie NY.rtf

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Colonie Interim Storage Site (CISS) Colonie, New York FACT SHEET Jan 2004 DESCRIPTION: The site consists of a total area of 11.2 acres plus 56 vicinity properties. The site was owned and operated by National Lead Industries (NL) from 1937-1984. The facility was used for electroplating and manufacturing various components from uranium and thorium. Radioactive materials released from the plant exhaust stacks spread to site buildings, portions of the grounds, and 56 commercial and residential

  6. FHA PowerSaver

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    FHA PowerSaver 203(k) Approved Lenders, Locations & Contact Information 1 | P a g e A s o f 1 8 - M a r - 1 4 Lender State Licensed In Contact Information AmeriFirst Financial Corporation 616 W. Centre Ave. Portage, MI 49024 ME, KY MN, WI, IL, MI, IN, OH, KY, TN, NC, FL Sandra Cartwright (269) 324-4240 scartwright@amerifirst.com Website: AmeriFirst Home Mortgage Neighbors Financial Corporation 2831 G Street Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95816 CA Melissa Hillis (916) 732-2340 ext. 251

  7. Solar Market Analytics, Roadmapping, and Tracking NY (SMART NY) Final Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Case, Tria; Reilly, Laurie; Kling, Alison

    2014-05-15

    This is the final report, including links to Working Group reports and an attached Working Group report for SunShot Initiative Rooftop Solar Challenge I, from Sustainable CUNY of the City University of New York, on behalf of New York City

  8. STEAB Meeting Minutes April 2007

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    State Energy Advisory Board Meeting April 8-10, 2007 Albuquerque, NM A Visit to the Sandia National Laboratory BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT Chris Benson (Chairman) (AR), Patricia Sobrero (Vice-Chair) (VA), Elliot Jacobson (Secretary) (MA), JamesEtta Reed (PA), Janet Streff (MN), Duane Hauck (ND), Peter Johnston (AZ), John Davies (KY), Jim Ploger (KS), Jim Nolan (MT), Susan Brown (WI), Steven Vincent (OR), Paul Gutierrez (NM), Daniel Zaweski (NY), and Robert Hoppie (ID). Others present were: Gary Burch,

  9. EIA - Natural Gas Pipeline Network - Largest Natural Gas Pipeline Systems

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Interstate Pipelines Table About U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines - Transporting Natural Gas based on data through 2007/2008 with selected updates Thirty Largest U.S. Interstate Natural Gas Pipeline Systems, 2008 (Ranked by system capacity) Pipeline Name Market Regions Served Primary Supply Regions States in Which Pipeline Operates Transported in 2007 (million dekatherm)1 System Capacity (MMcf/d) 2 System Mileage Columbia Gas Transmission Co. Northeast Southwest, Appalachia DE, PA, MD, KY, NC, NJ, NY,

  10. Water Heating Projects | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    HVAC, Water Heating, Appliances R&D » Water Heating Projects Water Heating Projects Figure 1: The system model for the combined Water heater, dehumidifier and cooler (WHDC). A Combined Water Heater, Dehumidifier, and Cooler (WHDC) Lead Performer: University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida Partners: -- Oak Ridge National Laboratory - Oak Ridge, TN -- Stony Brook University - Stony Brook, NY Adsorption Heat Pump Water Heater Lead Performer: Oak Ridge National Laboratory - Oak Ridge, TN Xergy

  11. nstec_home.xls

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    1 11767 1 11772 1 11778 1 11787 1 12144 1 12170 1 12189 1 12569 1 14625 1 NY Total 20 OK 73044 1 OK Total 1 PA 17302 1 PA Total 1 SC 29715 1 29909 1 SC Total 2 TN 37604 1 37722...

  12. Materials Data on KY3F10 (SG:160) by Materials Project

    DOE Data Explorer [Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)]

    Kristin Persson

    2014-11-02

    Computed materials data using density functional theory calculations. These calculations determine the electronic structure of bulk materials by solving approximations to the Schrodinger equation. For more information, see https://materialsproject.org/docs/calculations

  13. High Performance Without Increased Cost: Urbane Homes, Louisville, KY- Building America Top Innovation

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This Building America Innovations profile describes work with Urbane Homes of Louisville, Kentucky, to build a high-performance home that cost $36 per ft2 (not counting the lot).Between 2005 and 2010, Building America research partners worked with 34 builders to construct nearly 3,000 HERS

  14. Materials Data on KY(PO3)4 (SG:4) by Materials Project

    DOE Data Explorer [Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)]

    Kristin Persson

    2014-11-02

    Computed materials data using density functional theory calculations. These calculations determine the electronic structure of bulk materials by solving approximations to the Schrodinger equation. For more information, see https://materialsproject.org/docs/calculations

  15. GE Appliance Park Louisville, KY Plant Wide Assessment Final Report October 25th, 2007

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Chandon Rao; Richard Urschel

    2007-10-25

    Used a team of experts to analyze and model major systems at a large industrial appliance manufacturer. During the data gathering stage, the team specifically looked for baselining the efficiency of the systems as well as developing short term and longer term efficiency projects. Electrical distribution, Compressed air generation and thermal heat recovery for the production facility and front office heating and cooling optimization were all baselined during the study.

  16. New Whole-House Solutions Case Study: Urbane Homes, Louisville, KY

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Urbane Homes was founded in 2007, the downturn in the housing market was just beginning and the owners Abe Gilbert and Zane Underwood realized they would have to make their homes very affordable to survive. They worked with the National Association of Home Builders Research Center, a Building America research partner, to streamline their building practices and decided to make their homes more efficient as well. Their goal was to "pick all the low-hanging fruit for green and energy-

  17. Niagara Falls, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (Million...

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 9,497 6,894 4,421 2,459 935 1,060 1,452 979 644 1,443 1,404 1,583 2012 1,411 720 681 93 7 56 31 6 12 35 105 2013 299 291...

  18. Waddington, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (Million Cubic

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 35,222 28,023 21,841 13,715 12,079 14,620 21,184 14,405 12,504 15,162 18,131 24,944 2012 30,005 25,448 20,375 12,699 12,562 17,240 19,119 16,870 14,930 17,082 26,948 28,228 2013 30,284 28,462 30,812 14,028 9,391 10,773 15,366 7,708 8,022 9,364 22,246 28,215 2014 30,895 25,231 24,163 13,176 9,354 11,036 9,386 6,935 7,869 8,422 17,343 23,409 2015 31,386 30,303 29,987 10,141 2,827 2,720 5,889 5,975 5,506 14,520 19,502 16,327

  19. Niagara Falls, NY Natural Gas Exports to Canada

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    88,983 32,770 3,159 1,650 2,957 2,539 1996-2015 Pipeline Prices 5.43 4.68 3.22 4.04 5.08 3.2

  20. Niagara Falls, NY Natural Gas Exports to Canada

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    6,535 23,386 158,102 162,321 161,822 1998-2015 Pipeline Prices -- 4.76 4.09 4.15 5.51 2.96 1998

  1. NY-Sun Commerical/ Industrial Incentive Program | Department...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    incentives for installation of non-residential new grid connected solar photovoltaic (PV) systems that are greater than 200 kW. Incentives are awarded on a first-come, first...

  2. Northern Westchester Energy Action Consortium (NY) | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    the Consortium are regional solutions for: *Energy efficiency and conservation programs *Renewable energy use *Waste management including organic waste *Transportation efficiency...

  3. New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Albany, NY

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Development Authority Albany, New York NYSERDA Hydrogen Program State & Regional Hydrogen Initiatives July 12, 2006 New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) * A Public Benefit Corp established in 1975 by State Legislature * Mission: To identify solutions to State's energy challenges in ways that benefit the State's economy and environment * Forge public/private partnerships with businesses, municipalities, residents, and other energy stakeholders to accomplish this

  4. Consolidated Edison Co-NY Inc | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    CONS TOT REV (THOUSAND ) TOT SALES (MWH) TOT CONS 2009-03 180,424 829,996 2,282,842 177,132 1,007,995 393,452 2,556 15,772 240 104 656 5 360,216 1,854,419 2,676,539 2009-02...

  5. Property:EIA/861/IsoNy | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Inc. + true + M Major Energy Electric Services + true + N NOCO Electric + true + NRG Power Marketing LLC + true + National Grid Generation, LLC + true + (previous 25) (next...

  6. Methane Gas Utilization Project from Landfill at Ellery (NY)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Pantelis K. Panteli

    2012-01-10

    Landfill Gas to Electric Energy Generation and Transmission at Chautauqua County Landfill, Town of Ellery, New York. The goal of this project was to create a practical method with which the energy, of the landfill gas produced by the decomposing waste at the Chautauqua County Landfill, could be utilized. This goal was accomplished with the construction of a landfill gas to electric energy plant (originally 6.4MW and now 9.6MW) and the construction of an inter-connection power-line, from the power-plant to the nearest (5.5 miles) power-grid point.

  7. Grand Island, NY Natural Gas Exports to Canada

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    63,548 47,616 23,000 5,758 1,413 4,940 1996-2015 Pipeline Prices 5.20 4.68 3.01 3.92 9.80 4.23

  8. Grand Island, NY Natural Gas Exports to Canada

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    1,517 6,194 848 174 7,259 2007-2015 Pipeline Prices -- 3.82 3.02 3.84 9.80 2.38 2007

  9. Waddington, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (Dollars per

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Thousand Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's 2.92 2.82 2.38 2.54 2000's 4.24 4.81 3.60 5.81 6.51 9.38 7.62 7.57 9.42 4.60 2010's 5.44 4.99 3.87 5.58 8.54 5.00

  10. Waddington, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (Dollars per

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Thousand Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 5.32 5.46 5.14 5.14 5.20 5.22 5.22 5.00 4.71 4.55 4.32 4.20 2012 4.31 3.57 3.26 2.86 2.76 3.03 3.43 3.52 3.46 3.77 5.25 5.05 2013 6.86 6.48 5.16 5.04 4.88 4.62 4.42 3.98 4.03 3.98 4.69 7.40 2014 16.04 13.46 10.48 5.37 4.95 5.01 4.57 4.27 4.31 4.15 4.84 4.81 2015 6.23 10.52 4.38 2.89 2.79 2.79 3.03 2.75 2.99 2.87 2.63 2.54

  11. Waddington, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (Million Cubic

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's 288,807 295,568 293,234 324,400 2000's 337,989 290,981 285,188 296,989 331,234 349,230 406,033 422,315 395,758 349,980 2010's 267,227 231,831 241,506 214,671 187,219 175,084

  12. Waddington, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (Million Cubic

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 35,222 28,023 21,841 13,715 12,079 14,620 21,184 14,405 12,504 15,162 18,131 24,944 2012 30,005 25,448 20,375 12,699 12,562 17,240 19,119 16,870 14,930 17,082 26,948 28,228 2013 30,284 28,462 30,812 14,028 9,391 10,773 15,366 7,708 8,022 9,364 22,246 28,215 2014 30,895 25,231 24,163 13,176 9,354 11,036 9,386 6,935 7,869 8,422 17,343 23,409 2015 31,386 30,303 29,987 10,141 2,827 2,720 5,889 5,975 5,506 14,520 19,502 16,327

  13. Champlain, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (Dollars per

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Thousand Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's 3.29 3.40 3.53 3.68 2000's 3.86 4.03 4.17 4.34 4.53 4.81 5.04 5.23 5.63 5.21 2010's 6.02 6.11 4.50 7.22 13.60 5.57

  14. Champlain, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (Dollars per

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Thousand Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 7.34 6.56 5.91 5.40 5.47 5.45 5.64 5.26 4.94 4.57 4.49 4.78 2012 5.18 4.34 3.70 2.84 3.04 3.46 4.07 3.84 3.85 4.32 6.07 5.49 2013 10.24 10.66 6.06 5.47 5.00 4.48 4.63 4.16 4.27 4.18 4.43 7.72 2014 21.06 20.80 14.47 5.49 5.28 5.53 4.98 4.44 4.28 4.15 5.48 5.05 2015 5.91 11.77 4.62 3.39 3.64 3.57 3.80 3.61 3.68 3.26 2.84 2.85

  15. Microsoft Word - NY17-15 01-50.rtf

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    OR/20722-84 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Contract No. DE-ACO5-810R20722 POST-REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT FOR THE NIAGARA FALLS STORAGE SITE VICINITY PROPERTIES - 1983 AND 1984 Lewiston, New York December 1986 Bechtel National, Inc. This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor the United States Department of Energy, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their

  16. seca-core-tech-prw-ny | netl.doe.gov

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    National Laboratory Development of Ceramic Composites as SOFC Anodes PDF-481KB Olga Marina Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Compressive Seal Development PDF-1051KB Y.S....

  17. Estes, Deven P. [Columbia Univ., New York, NY (United States...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    an exchangeable proton, is eventually formed. We have determined the bond dissociation free energy and pKa of the new O-H bond in 6 to be 50.5 kcalmol and 13.4, respectively,...

  18. Radiological Scoping Survey of the Scotia Depot, Scotia, NY

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Bailey, E. N.

    2008-02-25

    The objectives of the radiological scoping survey were to collect adequate field data for use in evaluating the radiological condition of Scotia Depot land areas, warehouses, and support buildings.

  19. Buffalo, NY Liquefied Natural Gas Exports Price (Dollars per...

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015 7.65 7.65 7.65 7.75 - No Data Reported; -- Not Applicable; NA Not...

  20. Buffalo, NY Liquefied Natural Gas Exports (Million Cubic Feet...

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Natural Gas Exports (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015 1 1 1 1 - No Data Reported; -- Not Applicable; NA Not Available; W ...

  1. DOE Awards Small Business Contract for West Valley NY Services

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    CINCINNATI – The Department of Energy (DOE) today awarded a task order (contract) to Chenega Global Services, LLC of Anchorage, Alaska, for administrative and technical support services at the West Valley Demonstration Project, West Valley, New York. The contract has a one-year performance period with a value of $1.3 million, and contains two one-year extension options with a total value of $4.12 million. Chenega Global Services is a certified small and disadvantaged business under the Small Business Administration.

  2. Champlain, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (Million...

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    1,825 1,988 1,676 394 292 100 462 224 178 189 214 751 2012 1,070 862 537 288 186 347 644 403 427 469 640 892 2013 1,174 1,217 956 321 247 128 445 288 287 467 2014 1,289 1,051 522...

  3. Paleogeographic Setting

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    April 1, 2005 Reporting Period End Date: September 30, 2005 Principal Authors: Douglas G. Patchen, Taury Smith, Ron Riley, Mark Baranoski, David Harris, John Hickman, John Bocan and Michael Hohn October 2005 DOE Award Number: DE-FC26-03NT41856 West Virginia University Research Corporation P.O. Box 6845, Morgantown, WV 26506-6845 University of Kentucky Research Foundation 109 Kinkead Hall, Lexington, KY 40506-0057 New York State Museum Institute Room 3140 CEC, Albany, NY 12230 Ohio Division of

  4. 15-CS-1035 ESnet EuropeUS Map_EEX_v4

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Office of Science National Labs Ames ANL BNL FNAL JLAB Ames Laboratory (Ames, IA) Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne, IL) Brookhaven National Laboratory (Upton, NY) Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Batavia, IL) Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (Newport News, VA) LBNL ORNL PNNL PPPL SLAC Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley, CA) Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Oak Ridge, TN) Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (Richland, WA) Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

  5. CO2 Heat Pump Water Heater | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CO2 Heat Pump Water Heater CO2 Heat Pump Water Heater CO2 Heat Pump Water Heater Prototype<br /> Credit: Oak Ridge National Lab CO2 Heat Pump Water Heater Prototype Credit: Oak Ridge National Lab Lead Performer: Oak Ridge National Laboratory - Oak Ridge, TN Partners: General Electric Appliances - Louisville, KY DOE Funding: $2,147,000 Cost Share: Provided by CRADA partner Project Term: 10/1/2009 - 9/30/2015 Project Objective This project is developing a carbon dioxide (CO2) heat pump water

  6. EIA-912.xls

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Month 2 0 Address 2: City: State: Zip: - to meet the due date. Report volumes in million cubic feet (MMcf) @14.73 psia-60⁰ F.) No East Region (Million Cubic Feet) South Central Region (Million Cubic Feet) Midwest Region (Million Cubic Feet) Mountain Region (Million Cubic Feet) (AZ, CO, ID, MT, NE, ND, NM, NV, SD, UT, & WY) Midwest Region (Million Cubic Feet) (IL, IN, IA, KY, MI, MN, MO, TN, & WI) South Central Region (Million Cubic Feet) (AL, AR, KS, LA, MS, OK, & TX) Mountain

  7. Heat Pump Clothes Dryer | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Heat Pump Clothes Dryer Heat Pump Clothes Dryer Schematics of a heat pump clothes dryer<br /> Credit: Oak Ridge National Lab Schematics of a heat pump clothes dryer Credit: Oak Ridge National Lab Lead Performer: Oak Ridge National Laboratory - Oak Ridge, TN Partner: GE Appliances - Louisville, KY DOE Funding: $1,000,000 Cost Share: Provided by CRADA partner Project Term: Oct. 2013 - Sept. 2016 Project Objective The central objective of this project is to design and develop a heat pump

  8. 2012 Congressional Nuclear Cleanup Caucus Briefings | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    2 Congressional Nuclear Cleanup Caucus Briefings 2012 Congressional Nuclear Cleanup Caucus Briefings The Congressional Nuclear Cleanup Caucus serves as a way to brief members of Congress and their staff on EM headquarters and site activities, including budget, safety and project progress. PDF icon 02/16/2012 - FY 2013 Budget Overview PDF icon 03/07/2012 - Richland Operations Office, WA PDF icon 03/21/2012 - Oak Ridge, TN PDF icon 03/22/2012 - Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office, OH-KY PDF icon

  9. Reassessment of liquefaction potential and estimation of earthquake- induced settlements at Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant, Paducah, Kentucky. Final report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Sykora, D.W.; Yule, D.E.

    1996-04-01

    This report documents a reassessment of liquefaction potential and estimation of earthquake-induced settlements for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PGDP), located southwest of Paducah, KY. The U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station (WES) was authorized to conduct this study from FY91 to FY94 by the DOE, Oak Ridge Operations (ORO), Oak Ridge, TN, through Inter- Agency Agreement (IAG) No. DE-AI05-91OR21971. The study was conducted under the Gaseous Diffusion Plant Safety Analysis Report (GDP SAR) Program.

  10. Mountain Association for Community Economic Development- How$martKY On-Bill Financing Energy Efficiency Program

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Four rural utility cooperatives in Eastern Kentucky (Big Sandy RECC, Fleming-Mason RECC, Grayson RECC, and Jackson Energy) work with MACED to provide energy retrofits as part of utility service...

  11. Rulemaking, Public Hearing in Oak Ridge, TN (2/3/1999)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Chronic Beryllium Diease Prevention Program Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) Docket Number EH-RM-98-BRYLM

  12. CAD data exchange with Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc., Oak Ridge, TN

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Smith, K.L.

    1994-10-01

    This document has been developed to provide guidance in the interchange of electronic CAD data with Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc., Oak Ridge, Tennessee. It is not meant to be as comprehensive as the existing standards and specifications, but to provide a minimum set of practices that will enhance the success of the CAD data exchange. It is now a Department of Energy (DOE) Oak Ridge Field Office requirement that Architect-Engineering (A-E) firms prepare all new drawings using a Computer Aided Design (CAD) system that is compatible with the Facility Manager`s (FM) CAD system. For Oak Ridge facilities, the CAD system used for facility design by the FM, Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc., is Intregraph. The format for interchange of CAD data for Oak Ridge facilities will be the Intergraph MicroStation/IGDS format.

  13. Level 3 Baseline Risk Assessment for Building 3515 at Oak Ridge National Lab., Oak Ridge, TN

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Wollert, D.A.; Cretella, F.M.; Golden, K.M.

    1995-08-01

    The baseline risk assessment for the Fission Product Pilot Plant (Building 3515) at the Oak Ridge National laboratory (ORNL) provides the Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D) Program at ORNL and Building 3515 project managers with information concerning the results of the Level 3 baseline risk assessment performed for this building. The document was prepared under Work Breakdown Structure 1.4.12.6.2.01 (Activity Data Sheet 3701, Facilities D&D) and includes information on the potential long-term impacts to human health and the environment if no action is taken to remediate Building 3515. Information provided in this document forms the basis for the development of remedial alternatives and the no-action risk portion of the Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis report.

  14. Microsoft PowerPoint - Camper, ORNL-TN CAB-04-2010-final, via...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Team Meetings * ReviewComment on Decommissioning Plan ReviewComment on ... Monitoring Role Monitoring Role * Current Status P * Progress 3 Depleted Uranium Disposal ...

  15. Data Sharing Report Characterization of Isotope Row Facilities Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge TN

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Weaver, Phyllis C

    2013-12-12

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management (EM-OR) requested that Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU), working under the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) contract, provide technical and independent waste management planning support using funds provided by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). Specifically, DOE EM-OR requested ORAU to plan and implement a survey approach, focused on characterizing the Isotope Row Facilities located at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) for future determination of an appropriate disposition pathway for building debris and systems, should the buildings be demolished. The characterization effort was designed to identify and quantify radiological and chemical contamination associated with building structures and process systems. The Isotope Row Facilities discussed in this report include Bldgs. 3030, 3031, 3032, 3033, 3033A, 3034, 3036, 3093, and 3118, and are located in the northeast quadrant of the main ORNL campus area, between Hillside and Central Avenues. Construction of the isotope production facilities was initiated in the late 1940s, with the exception of Bldgs. 3033A and 3118, which were enclosed in the early 1960s. The Isotope Row facilities were intended for the purpose of light industrial use for the processing, assemblage, and storage of radionuclides used for a variety of applications (ORNL 1952 and ORAU 2013). The Isotope Row Facilities provided laboratory and support services as part of the Isotopes Production and Distribution Program until 1989 when DOE mandated their shutdown (ORNL 1990). These facilities performed diverse research and developmental experiments in support of isotopes production. As a result of the many years of operations, various projects, and final cessation of operations, production was followed by inclusion into the surveillance and maintenance (S&M) project for eventual decontamination and decommissioning (D&D). The process for D&D and final dismantlement of facilities requires that the known contaminants of concern (COCs) be evaluated and quantified and to identify and quantify any additional contaminants in order to satisfy the waste acceptance criteria requirements for the desired disposal pathway. Known facility contaminants include, but are not limited to, asbestos-containing material (ACM), radiological contaminants, and chemical contaminants including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and metals.

  16. DOE-NNSA and State of TN Participate in Regional CAPSTONE Exercise...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    and the State of Tennessee's Offices of Emergency Management & Division of Radiological Health will participate in a Regional CAPSTONE exercise with activities to be conducted by...

  17. Microsoft Word - West TN Solar Farm_Final EA.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    6 10-088(E)/010511 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WEST TENNESSEE SOLAR FARM PROJECT HAYWOOD COUNTY, TENNESSEE U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Pittsburgh, PA February 2011 DOE/EA-1706 10-088(E)/010511 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT West Tennessee Solar Farm Project Haywood County, Tennessee February 2011 Environmental Assessment for the West Tennessee Solar Farm Project Table of Contents i Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION

  18. BlocPower: Crowdsourced Microfinance for Energy Efficiency in...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    NY Partners: - New York State Energy Research and Development Authority - Albany, NY - Emerald Cities Collaborative-NY - New York, NY - Orrick, Herrington, & Sutcliffe - New York,...

  19. DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: Greenhill Contracting The Preserve, New Paltz, NY

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    none,

    2014-09-01

    These super-insulated homes all have R-22 insulated concrete form walls, R-20 closed-cell spray form under the slab, ground source heat pump, tight air sealing, and morehelping this builder to win a Production Builder award in the 2014 Housing Innovation Awards.

  20. DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: AquaZephyr Eco-Village-Ithaca, Ithaca, NY

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    none,

    2014-09-01

    This two-story, 1,664 ft2 home is one of 17 single-family and four duplex homes built as part of an energy-efficient cooperative. Winner in the Production Builder category of the 2014 Housing Innovation Awards, the home achieves a HERS 56 without photovoltaics and HERS 15 with 4 kW of photovoltaics.

  1. NY-Sun Solar PV Competitive Program (New York) | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Industrial, Nonprofit, Construction, InstallerContractor Eligible Technologies Photovoltaics, Anaerobic Digestion Active Incentive Yes Implementing Sector State...

  2. NY-Sun PV Incentive Program (Residential, Low-Income, and Small Business)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    NYSERDA has established separate megawatt (MW) budgets for different regions of the state. These MW block targets are specified for three regions: areas served by Con Edison, areas served by PSEG...

  3. Massena, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada (Million Cubic Feet)

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012 472

  4. Massena, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (Million Cubic Feet)

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 873 767 704 412 240 192 197 188 135 37 53 167 2012 573 505 424 324 197 201 211 179 174 224 418 562 2013 588 581 537 346 91 159 184 164 191 265 430 612 2014 666 575 574 283 176 152 169 165 163 172 331 394 2015 589 609 486 216 84 80 89 76 79 217 273 252

  5. Waddington, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada (Million Cubic Feet)

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 580 1,310 2,522 3,252 3,026 2,668 2,170 2,445 2,379 2,066 5,121 3,191 2012 898 4,000 6,745 4,975 2,721 1,978 1,202 2,306 2,503 4,747 3,808 2,909 2013 3,963 1,204 3,938 2,545 2,849 1,924 740 1,598 1,917 1,951 1,281 1,213 2014 1,937 1,664 1,734 1,740 6,202 3,674 5,112 5,036 4,276 4,714 1,848 1,259 2015 873 598 555 741 582 638 366 378 489 339 853 2,362

  6. Niagara Falls, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada (Million Cubic

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 734 660 860 860 194 307 295 1,107 376 151 415 576 2012 583 468 175 58 8,823 13,281 2013 12,716 11,162 12,737 13,738 13,789 13,174 13,904 13,939 13,022 13,267 12,940 13,715 2014 14,211 13,161 14,549 13,012 13,641 13,234 13,634 13,645 13,274 13,071 13,092 13,797 2015 2,696 10,576 13,577 13,247 14,219 13,657 14,297 14,009 14,476 14,578 17,873 18,617

  7. BuildSmart NY Innovators Summit Offers Sneak Peek at Better Buildings Challenge Solutions to Come

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    As the newest state partner in the Better Buildings Challenge, New York is off to an impressive start. New York is committed to making its entire portfolio of buildings 20% more efficient by 2020.

  8. File:EIA-Appalach1-NY-BOE.pdf | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    to: navigation, search File File history File usage Appalachian Basin, New York Area Oil and Gas Fields By 2001 BOE Reserve Class Size of this preview: 776 600 pixels. Full...

  9. File:EIA-Appalach1-NY-LIQ.pdf | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    to: navigation, search File File history File usage Appalachian Basin, New York Area Oil and Gas Fields By 2001 Liquids Reserve Class Size of this preview: 776 600 pixels....

  10. File:EIA-Appalach1-NY-GAS.pdf | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    to: navigation, search File File history File usage Appalachian Basin, New York Area Oil and Gas Fields By 2001 Gas Reserve Class Size of this preview: 776 600 pixels. Full...

  11. GE Teams with NY College to Pilot SOFC Technology |GE Global...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    already holds Platinum-certification from the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) program of the United States Green Building Council." Congressman Paul Tonko...

  12. Revving up Energy Efficiency at the Cummins Plant in Jamestown, NY |

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Department of Energy On the roof of the Cummins plant, tour participants take a peek at a new 2 MW solar panel installation. From left to right: Dennis Phillips, the Jamestown Post Journal, Maria Vargas, DOE, Andre de Fontaine, DOE, Mike Abbate, Cummins.| Photo courtesy of Cummins Inc. On the roof of the Cummins plant, tour participants take a peek at a new 2 MW solar panel installation. From left to right: Dennis Phillips, the Jamestown Post Journal, Maria Vargas, DOE, Andre de Fontaine,

  13. MHK Projects/GCK Technology Shelter Island NY US | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Inc Project Technology *MHK TechnologiesGorlov Helical Turbine Project Licensing Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Efforts See Tethys << Return to the MHK database...

  14. DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: AquaZephyr, Ithaca, NY...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    with double-stud walls filled with R-22 closed-cell spray foam plus R-30 blown cellulose, coated OSB sheathing, 5.5-in. foil-faced polyiso under the slab, polyiso-insulated...

  15. EIS-0003: Proton-Proton Storage Accelerator Facility (Isabelle), Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy developed this EIS to analyze the significant environmental effects associated with construction and operation of the ISABELLE research facility to be built at Brookhaven National Laboratory.

  16. Experiment summary for n/y attenuation through materials (Environments 1A).

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    DePriest, Kendall Russell

    2006-05-01

    The Radiation Effects Sciences (RES) program is responsible for conducting Neutron Gamma Energy Transport (NuGET) code validation. In support of this task, a series of experiments were conducted in the annular core research reactor (ACRR) to investigate the modification of the incident neutron/gamma environment by aluminum (Al6061) and high-density polyethylene (HDPE) spheres with 4-in and 7-in-diameter. The experiment series described in this report addresses several NuGET validation concerns. The validation experiment series also addresses the design and execution of proper reactor testing to match the hostile radiation environments and to match the component stresses that arise from the hostile radiation environments. This report summarizes the RES Validation: n/{gamma} Attenuation through Materials, Environments 1A, experiments conducted at the ACRR in FY 2003 using ACRR Experiment Plans 933 and 949.

  17. Grand Island, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada (Million Cubic

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 586 931 2012 1,802 1,578 824 304 116 261 526 386 159 111 17 109 2013 314 277 161 47 20 10 10 11 2014 132 1 14 8 19 2015 224 565 378 15 0 2,098 3,980

  18. Grand Island, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (Million Cubic

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 13,011 9,155 4,908 3,006 1,434 1,198 3,882 2,751 1,992 1,067 1,749 3,462 2012 4,801 4,288 2,138 2,383 1,575 2,037 2,018 916 829 773 297 945 2013 1,579 2,099 825 266 117 310 61 118 80 1 270 32 2014 1,204 17 111 31 8 29 12 2015 1,125 2,816 633 132 196 1 1 5 29

  19. Massena, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 0 472 0 0

  20. Massena, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012 472

  1. Massena, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (Dollars per Thousand

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's 2.92 3.04 2.78 2.81 2000's 4.25 4.96 4.08 6.08 7.06 9.34 8.95 7.78 9.69 6.85 2010's 6.48 6.55 5.75 6.04 7.34 5.65

  2. Massena, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (Dollars per Thousand

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 6.63 6.67 7.13 6.84 6.97 5.92 5.48 6.42 5.84 4.29 4.30 5.81 2012 6.07 5.83 5.26 5.21 5.09 5.16 5.01 5.21 5.29 6.03 6.64 6.31 2013 6.56 6.42 6.58 6.32 5.57 5.92 4.59 4.50 4.79 5.11 5.89 6.41 2014 9.00 8.27 8.64 6.68 6.09 6.12 5.78 5.19 5.38 5.22 6.43 6.83 2015 6.31 6.35 6.21 5.40 3.80 3.68 3.60 3.64 3.71 5.32 4.85 5.84

  3. Massena, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's 13,642 12,927 9,184 7,258 2000's 7,309 6,931 7,662 6,817 7,357 6,989 6,588 6,887 6,588 5,730 2010's 5,595 3,965 3,992 4,147 3,819 3,049

  4. Massena, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 873 767 704 412 240 192 197 188 135 37 53 167 2012 573 505 424 324 197 201 211 179 174 224 418 562 2013 588 581 537 346 91 159 184 164 191 265 430 612 2014 666 575 574 283 176 152 169 165 163 172 331 394 2015 589 609 486 216 84 80 89 76 79 217 273 252

  5. Niagara Falls, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada (Dollars per

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Thousand Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's NA NA 2000's NA 2.49 5.04 6.77 6.99 -- -- -- -- -- 2010's -- 4.76 4.09 4.15 5.51 2.96

  6. Niagara Falls, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada (Dollars per

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Thousand Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 5.04 5.23 4.96 4.84 4.94 5.04 4.94 4.56 4.39 3.96 4.54 4.07 2012 3.71 3.32 2.93 2.33 4.18 4.09 2013 4.13 3.91 4.34 4.47 4.42 4.24 4.03 3.76 3.85 3.87 4.08 4.67 2014 6.87 10.13 9.18 5.08 4.70 4.57 4.07 3.69 3.69 3.92 5.09 4.80 2015 3.09 5.02 4.48 2.93 2.70 2.63 2.55 2.64 2.67 2.59 2.72 2.42

  7. Niagara Falls, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada (Million Cubic

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's NA NA 2000's NA 594 39 2,215 3 0 0 0 0 0 2010's 0 6,535 23,386 158,102 162,321 161,822

  8. Niagara Falls, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada (Million Cubic

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 734 660 860 860 194 307 295 1,107 376 151 415 576 2012 583 468 175 58 8,823 13,281 2013 12,716 11,162 12,737 13,738 13,789 13,174 13,904 13,939 13,022 13,267 12,940 13,715 2014 14,211 13,161 14,549 13,012 13,641 13,234 13,634 13,645 13,274 13,071 13,092 13,797 2015 2,696 10,576 13,577 13,247 14,219 13,657 14,297 14,009 14,476 14,578 17,873 18,617

  9. Niagara Falls, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (Dollars per

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Thousand Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's 2.90 2.87 2.62 2.58 2000's 4.10 4.94 3.55 5.71 6.41 9.06 7.43 7.36 9.58 4.63 2010's 5.43 4.68 3.22 4.04 5.08 3.20

  10. Niagara Falls, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (Dollars per

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Thousand Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 5.02 4.80 4.46 4.75 4.72 5.03 4.80 4.49 4.24 3.98 4.05 3.87 2012 3.46 3.13 2.81 2.38 2.97 3.26 2.43 3.22 3.66 4.18 3.85 2013 3.89 3.75 4.21 4.46 4.38 3.86 3.57 3.33 4.12 3.91 3.24 4.26 2014 4.28 5.86 5.38 21.67 22.33 21.67 22.33 22.33 3.24 2.68 2015 3.45 4.36 3.65 2.08 3.14 2.85 2.73 2.31 1.97

  11. Niagara Falls, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (Million Cubic

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's 291,193 288,865 303,599 372,515 2000's 421,016 308,102 367,448 369,052 363,350 390,272 354,703 356,529 298,911 188,525 2010's 88,983 32,770 3,159 1,650 2,957 2,539

  12. Niagara Falls, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (Million Cubic

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 9,497 6,894 4,421 2,459 935 1,060 1,452 979 644 1,443 1,404 1,583 2012 1,411 720 681 93 7 56 31 6 12 35 105 2013 299 291 49 103 12 0 0 6 281 97 41 471 2014 1,092 908 893 0 0 0 0 0 57 6 2015 168 796 162 23 6 356 351 333 346

  13. Price of Buffalo, NY Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Canada (Dollars per

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Thousand Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's -- 12.07 -- -- 2010's -- 7.67

  14. Price of Buffalo, NY Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Canada (Dollars per

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Thousand Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015 7.65 7.65 7.65 7.75

  15. Price of Champlain, NY Natural Gas LNG Imports (Dollars per Thousand Cubic

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's -- 10.69 8.78

  16. Price of Champlain, NY Natural Gas LNG Imports (Dollars per Thousand Cubic

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014 10.69 2015 9.66 9.54 9.87 9.92 8.50

  17. Price of Champlain, NY Natural Gas LNG Imports from Canada (Dollars per

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Thousand Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's -- 10.69 8.78

  18. Price of Champlain, NY Natural Gas LNG Imports from Canada (Dollars per

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Thousand Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014 10.69 2015 9.66 9.54 9.87 9.92 8.50

  19. Price of Massena, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada (Dollars per

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Thousand Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's -- 2.96 -- --

  20. Price of Massena, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada (Dollars per

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Thousand Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012 2.96

  1. Waddington, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Exports (Price) to Canada (Dollars per

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Thousand Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's -- -- -- 2010's -- 4.71 3.42 5.16 5.77 3.58

  2. Waddington, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Exports (Price) to Canada (Dollars per

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Thousand Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 7.73 6.52 5.03 4.85 4.94 5.07 5.04 4.58 4.38 3.99 4.09 4.11 2012 4.13 3.39 2.83 2.48 2.67 2.78 3.36 3.31 3.20 3.82 5.22 4.65 2013 6.75 7.39 5.25 5.00 4.66 4.28 4.37 3.99 4.00 3.98 4.28 7.05 2014 20.09 17.10 11.65 4.88 4.55 4.59 4.06 3.63 3.62 3.42 5.20 3.86 2015 6.61 12.26 4.43 2.81 2.82 2.54 2.64 2.32 2.98 2.79 2.31 1.81

  3. Waddington, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 0 0 2010's 0 30,731 38,791 25,121 39,196 8,775

  4. Waddington, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 580 1,310 2,522 3,252 3,026 2,668 2,170 2,445 2,379 2,066 5,121 3,191 2012 898 4,000 6,745 4,975 2,721 1,978 1,202 2,306 2,503 4,747 3,808 2,909 2013 3,963 1,204 3,938 2,545 2,849 1,924 740 1,598 1,917 1,951 1,281 1,213 2014 1,937 1,664 1,734 1,740 6,202 3,674 5,112 5,036 4,276 4,714 1,848 1,259 2015 873 598 555 741 582 638 366 378 489 339 853 2,362

  5. Buffalo, NY Liquefied Natural Gas Exports Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 7.67

  6. Champlain, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's 16,104 16,669 15,258 17,171 2000's 17,436 17,329 16,904 12,579 16,502 17,142 17,721 17,666 17,964 13,986 2010's 9,173 8,293 6,766 7,228 4,922 4,446

  7. Champlain, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 1,825 1,988 1,676 394 292 100 462 224 178 189 214 751 2012 1,070 862 537 288 186 347 644 403 427 469 640 892 2013 1,174 1,217 956 321 247 128 445 288 287 467 508 1,189 2014 1,289 1,051 522 242 169 140 139 154 199 203 424 390 2015 746 901 399 276 159 141 204 180 311 297 549 282

  8. Grand Island, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Exports (Price) to Canada (Dollars

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    per Thousand Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's -- -- -- 2010's -- 3.82 3.02 3.84 9.80 2.38

  9. Grand Island, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Exports (Price) to Canada (Dollars

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    per Thousand Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 3.96 3.74 2012 3.18 3.03 2.70 2.65 2.45 2.74 3.00 3.22 3.11 3.38 4.30 3.76 2013 3.68 3.67 4.06 4.76 4.43 4.22 4.31 3.88 2014 8.82 9.67 28.87 4.98 4.17 2015 3.38 4.68 3.53 2.93 3.10 2.23 1.97

  10. Grand Island, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada (Million Cubic

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 0 0 2010's 0 1,517 6,194 848 174 7,259

  11. Grand Island, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada (Million Cubic

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 586 931 2012 1,802 1,578 824 304 116 261 526 386 159 111 17 109 2013 314 277 161 47 20 10 10 11 2014 132 1 14 8 19 2015 224 565 378 15 0 2,098 3,980

  12. Grand Island, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (Dollars per

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Thousand Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's 3.35 3.42 2.80 3.07 2000's 4.24 4.08 3.57 6.26 6.63 9.07 7.61 7.41 8.94 4.85 2010's 5.20 4.68 3.01 3.92 9.80 4.23

  13. Grand Island, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (Dollars per

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Thousand Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 4.91 4.71 4.67 4.89 4.95 5.14 4.86 4.57 4.43 4.27 3.99 3.77 2012 3.18 3.08 2.77 2.37 2.55 2.67 3.22 3.24 3.22 3.65 4.06 3.82 2013 3.76 3.75 4.03 4.81 4.57 4.27 4.16 4.00 4.13 4.02 4.03 4.30 2014 8.50 8.22 28.04 5.20 5.03 4.18 4.04 2015 3.17 4.89 4.06 2.90 2.60 2.31 1.89 2.75 1.72

  14. Grand Island, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (Million Cubic

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's 42,832 42,302 44,981 33,140 2000's 49,012 95,639 110,417 76,421 66,612 92,474 80,907 88,886 61,641 81,898 2010's 63,548 47,616 23,000 5,758 1,413 4,940

  15. Grand Island, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (Million Cubic

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 13,011 9,155 4,908 3,006 1,434 1,198 3,882 2,751 1,992 1,067 1,749 3,462 2012 4,801 4,288 2,138 2,383 1,575 2,037 2,018 916 829 773 297 945 2013 1,579 2,099 825 266 117 310 61 118 80 1 270 32 2014 1,204 17 111 31 8 29 12 2015 1,125 2,816 633 132 196 1 1 5 29

  16. Microsoft PowerPoint - mather_twpice_data_status_ny.ppt

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Twin Otter TWP-ICE/ACTIVE Observation Network Egrett (UK) Proteus Dornier (UK) Dimona Tiwi Islands Darwin Mt Bundy Pt Stuart Cape Don Garden Point Southern Surveyor In situ microphysics Radar/Lidar Chemistry/Aerosol/Atm state Fluxes/Atmospheric state Darwin ARM Measurements *Cloud Profiles - mm radar and lidar *T/RH/Wind Profiles - radiosondes (BOM) *Column water - microwave radiometer *Column Aerosol - solar spectral radiometer *Surface radiation budget - solar and terrestrial *Surface

  17. MICROANALYSIS OF NY/NJ HARBOR SEDIMENTS USING SYNCHROTRON X-RAY BEAMS.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    JONES,K.W.FENG,H.LANZIROTTI,A.MARINKOVIC,N.ET AL.

    2003-12-31

    Sediments found in the New York/New Jersey Harbor are widely contaminated with organic and inorganic compounds of anthropogenic origin. As a result, the environmental health of the Harbor has deteriorated and the efficient operation of the Port compromised by difficulties in disposing of sediments resulting from maintenance and improvements of navigational channels. Knowledge of the properties of the sediments on a micro-scale is useful in understanding the transport of contaminants through the environment, for developing effective methods for sediment decontamination, and for subsequent beneficial use of the cleaned sediments. We have investigated several properties of these sediments using synchrotron radiation techniques. These include computed microtomography using absorption and fluorescence contrast mechanisms, x-ray microscopy, microbeam x-ray fluorescence, and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) for measurements of microstructure, distribution of metals on individual sediment particles, and chemical forms of the contaminants on a micrometer scale. Typical results obtained with these techniques are presented.

  18. DOE ZERH Case Study: Greenhill Contracting, Green Acres #20, #26, #28, New Paltz, NY

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    none,

    2015-09-01

    Case study of three DOE 2015 Housing Innovation Award winning custom homes in the cold climate that got a HERS of 26, 28, and 26 without PV or -3, -1, and -3.5 with PV; with R-22 ICFs, 10” ocsf plus 2.7” c ccsf in attic; ICF basements with 4.3” ccsf under slab; tri;e-pane windows; ERVs, ground source heat pumps (COP 5.7).

  19. DOE ZERH Case Study: United Way of Long Island Housing Development Corporation, Patchogue, NY

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    none,

    2015-09-01

    Case study of a DOE 2015 Housing Innovation Award winning affordable home in the mixed-humid climate that got HERS 40 without PV, -3 with PV, with 2x4 16: on center walls with R-13.5 dense packed cellulose and 1.5” polyiso rigid; basement with 2.5: polyiso on interior; unvented attic with R-48 ocsf under roof deck; ERV tied to wall hung boiler with hydro coil.

  20. BuildSmart NY Innovators Summit Offers Sneak Peek at Better Buildings...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    is approximately 205 million square feet of real estate, including universities, prisons, mental health hospitals, office buildings, and facilities that house its trains, buses,...

  1. untitled

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Crude Oil Prices Table 18. Domestic Crude Oil First Purchase Prices (Dollars per Barrel) Year Month U.S. Average PAD District I PAD District II U.S. Average Less AK North Slope Average NY PA WV Average IL IN KS KY MI NE 1983 ..................... 26.19 28.00 28.32 28.19 28.28 27.27 29.17 29.12 29.06 28.45 28.60 28.93 28.58 1984 ..................... 25.88 27.59 27.76 27.70 27.71 26.90 28.62 28.76 28.72 27.99 28.24 28.54 27.83 1985 ..................... 24.09 25.74 25.88 25.19 25.05 24.35 25.94

  2. untitled

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Domestic Crude Oil First Purchase Prices (Dollars per Barrel) Year Month U.S. Average PAD District I PAD District II U.S. Average Less AK North Slope Average NY PA WV Average IL IN KS KY MI NE 1983 ..................... 26.19 28.00 28.32 28.19 28.28 27.27 29.17 29.12 29.06 28.45 28.60 28.93 28.58 1984 ..................... 25.88 27.59 27.76 27.70 27.71 26.90 28.62 28.76 28.72 27.99 28.24 28.54 27.83 1985 ..................... 24.09 25.74 25.88 25.19 25.05 24.35 25.94 26.90 26.82 25.33 26.20

  3. Microsoft Word - figure_14.doc

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    42 Figure 14. Net interstate movements, imports, and exports of natural gas in the United States, 2014 (million cubic feet) Norway Trinidad/ Tobago Yemen Trinidad/ Tobago Interstate Movements Not Shown on Map From Volume To From Volume To CT RI Other TX IN MA RI MA MA CT VA DC MD DC VT MA NH MA WA M T I D O R W Y ND SD C A N V U T CO NE KS A Z NM OK TX MN WI MI IA I L IN OH MO AR M S AL GA T N KY FL SC NC WV MD DE VA PA NJ NY CT RI MA VT NH ME LA HI A K Mexico C a n a d a C a n a d a Canada

  4. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Prices U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly Table 18. Domes c crude oil fi rst purchase prices dollars per barrel Year month U.S. Average PAD District 1 PAD District 2 U.S. Average Less AK North Slope Average NY PA WV Average IL IN KS KY MI NE 1990 20.03 21.57 22.06 23.32 23.00 22.16 22.88 23.36 23.46 23.21 23.20 22.92 21.94 1991 16.54 18.16 19.01 19.67 19.48 W 19.58 20.19 20.20 19.84 19.84 19.88 18.78 1992 15.99 17.38 18.52 19.05 19.01 18.09 18.63 19.26 19.27

  5. DOE - NNSA/NFO -- FRMAC DOE RAP Regions

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    RAP Regions NNSA/NFO Language Options U.S. DOE/NNSA - Nevada Field Office FRMAC DOE RAP Regions DOE Regional Map Region Contact for Questions 24-Hour Telephone for Assistance 0 Regional Response Coordinator, Remote Sensing Laboratory - Andrews P.O. Box 380, M/S RSL-AO, Suitland, MD 20752 (301) 817-3301 1 Regional Response Coordinator, Brookhaven Site Office 53 Bell Ave., Long Island, NY 11973 (631) 344-2200 2 Regional Response Coordinator, Oak Ridge Office P.O. Box 2001, Oak Ridge, TN 37831

  6. Kentucky Department for Natural Resources and Environmental Protection permit application for air contaminant source: SRC-I demonstration plant, Newman, Kentucky. [Demonstration plant at Newman, KY

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    none,

    1980-11-21

    This document and its several appendices constitute an application for a Kentucky Permit to Construct an Air Contaminant Source as well as a Prevention of Significant Air Quality Deterioration (PSD) Permit Application. The information needed to satisfy the application requirements for both permits has been integrated into a complete and logical description of the proposed source, its emissions, control systems, and its expected air quality impacts. The Department of Energy believes that it has made every reasonable effort to be responsive to both the letter and the spirit of the PSD regulations (40 CFR 52.21) and Kentucky Regulation No. 401 KAR 50:035. In this regard, it is important to note that because of the preliminary status of some aspects of the process engineering and engineering design for the Demonstration Plant, it is not yet possible precisely to define some venting operations or their associated control systems. Therefore, it is not possible precisely to quantify some atmospheric emissions or their likely impact on air quality. In these instances, DOE and ICRC have used assumptions that produce impact estimates that are believed to be worst case and are not expected to be exceeded no matter what the outcome of future engineering decisions. As these decisions are made, emission quantities and rates, control system characteristics and efficiencies, and vent stack parameters are more precisely defined; this Permit Application will be supplemented or modified as appropriate. But, all needed modifications are expected to represent either decreases or at worst no changes in the air quality impact of the SRC-I Demonstration Plant.

  7. VA VT CT RI MT WY CO ID UT OR NV CA AZ NM WA TN WV NC AR OK

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    2 1 Locations of Smart Grid Demonstration and Large-Scale Energy Storage Projects NH 32 Awards Support Projects in 24 States 6 11 MA...

  8. COMPARISON OF RESULTS FOR QUARTER 4 SURFACE WATER SPLIT SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THE NUCLEAR FUELS SERVICES SITE, ERWIN, TN

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    none,

    2013-08-15

    Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU), under the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) contract, collected split surface water samples with Nuclear Fuel Services (NFS) representatives on June 12, 2013. Representatives from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation were also in attendance. Samples were collected at four surface water stations, as required in the approved Request for Technical Assistance number 11-018. These stations included Nolichucky River upstream (NRU), Nolichucky River downstream (NRD), Martin Creek upstream (MCU), and Martin Creek downstream (MCD). Both ORAU and NFS performed gross alpha and gross beta analyses, and Table 1 presents the comparison of results using the duplicate error ratio (DER), also known as the normalized absolute difference. A DER ≤ 3 indicates at a 99% confidence interval that split sample results do not differ significantly when compared to their respective one standard deviation (sigma) uncertainty (ANSI N42.22). The NFS split sample report specifies 95% confidence level of reported uncertainties (NFS 2013). Therefore, standard two sigma reporting values were divided by 1.96. In conclusion, most DER values were less than 3 and results are consistent with low (e.g., background) concentrations. The gross beta result for sample 5198W0014 was the exception. The ORAU gross beta result of 6.30 ± 0.65 pCi/L from location NRD is well above NFS's non-detected result of 1.56 ± 0.59 pCi/L. NFS's data package includes no detected result for any radionuclide at location NRD. At NRC's request, ORAU performed gamma spectroscopic analysis of sample 5198W0014 to identify analytes contributing to the relatively elevated gross beta results. This analysis identified detected amounts of naturally-occurring constituents, most notably Ac-228 from the thorium decay series, and does not suggest the presence of site-related contamination.

  9. Results for the Independent Sampling and Analysis of Used Oil Drums at the Impact Services Facility in Oak Ridge, TN

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    2013-04-25

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) requested that Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU), via the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) contract, perform independent sampling and analysis of used oils contained within eight 55 gallon drums stored at the former IMPACT Services facility, located at the East Tennessee Technology Park in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. These drums were originally delivered by LATA Sharp Remediation Services (LSRS) to IMPACT Services on January 11, 2011 as part of the Bldg. K-33 demolition project, and the drums plus contents should have been processed as non-hazardous non-radiological waste by IMPACT Services. LSRS received a certificate of destruction on August 29, 2012 (LSRS 2012a). However, IMPACT Services declared bankruptcy and abandoned the site later in 2012, and eight of the original eleven K-33 drums are currently stored at the facility. The content of these drums is the subject of this investigation. The original drum contents were sampled by LSRS in 2010 and analyzed for gross alpha, gross beta, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), using both compositing and grab sampling techniques. The objective of this 2013 sample and analysis effort was to duplicate, to the extent possible, the 2010 sampling and analysis event to support final disposition decisions. Part of that decision process includes either verifying or refuting the assertion that oils that are currently stored in drums at the IMPACT Services facility originated from Bldg. K-33 equipment.

  10. VA VT CT RI MT WY CO ID UT OR NV CA AZ NM WA TN WV NC AR OK

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    2 1 Locations of Smart Grid Demonstration and Large-Scale Energy Storage Projects NH 32 Awards Support Projects in 24 States 6 11 MA

  11. VA VT CT RI MT WY CO ID UT OR NV CA AZ NM WA TN WV NC AR OK

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    2 1 Smart Grid Demonstration Project Locations NH MA 16 Awards Support Projects in 21 States

  12. VA VT CT RI MT WY CO ID UT OR NV CA AZ NM WA TN WV NC AR OK

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    7 2 1 Energy Storage Demonstration Project Locations NH 16 Awards Support Projects in 9 States MA

  13. U.S. Natural Gas Exports to Mexico

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    MI St. Clair, MI Noyes, MN Warroad, MN Babb, MT Havre, MT Port of Morgan, MT Sherwood, ND Pittsburg, NH Buffalo, NY Grand Island, NY Massena, NY Niagara Falls, NY Waddington, NY...

  14. Gatton Academy Wins 2015 DOE West Kentucky Regional Science Bowl...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    PADUCAH, KY - Gatton Academy, Bowling Green, KY, won the U.S. Department of Energy's ... areas of science, including biology, chemistry, Earth science, physics, energy, and math. ...

  15. Worksheet

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,1,50022,3,,,,6,1,85400,2,"FO2",1,1,10893,137630,0.22,0,282.2,,1,,2 1978,1,50022,3,,,,6,1,85500,3,"NG",5,5,103689,1193,0,0,210.7,,1,,2 1978,1,50022,3,"KY",8,"S",6,1,85300,1,"BIT",7,7,24535,10812,1.15,13.3,155.7,,1,,2 1978,1,50022,3,"TN",8,"S",6,1,85200,1,"BIT",7,7,22749,10797,1.46,13.6,153.6,,1,,2 1978,1,50022,5,,,,6,1,85600,3,"NG",5,5,147714,1190,0,0,210.8,,1,,2

  16. Prediction of external corrosion for UF{sub 6} cylinders: Results of an empirical method

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Lyon, B.F.

    1995-06-01

    Wall thickness data for depleted LTF, (DU) cylinders in above-ground storage at three Department of Energy (DOE) sites (Oak Ridge, TN; Paducah, KY; Portsmouth, OH) were analyzed in order to address the following questions: How many cylinders may have breaches now? and, What will the conditions be like in 2020? This report summarizes preliminary results of the analyses conducted. These results are to be used as input into models for estimating risks and hazards associated with the cylinders in the various conditions. These models will then be used as a basis for implementing engineering fixes where possible and for management decisions on corrective actions. This is part of the overall assessment of the risks and hazards within the DU management program.

  17. Version No.: 2002.001

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ... ,"NC",123,"Montgomery" ,"NC",125,"Moore" ,"NC",127,"Nash" ,"NC",129,"New Hanover" ... ,"TN",125,"Montgomery" ,"TN",127,"Moore" ,"TN",129,"Morgan" ,"TN",131,"Obion" ...

  18. 2013,1,"AK",3522,"Chugach Electric Assn Inc",0,,,,0,0,,,,0,0,,,,0

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    STATE_CODE","UTILITY_ID","UTILNAME","RESIDENTIAL_GPREVENUES","COMMERCIAL_GPREVENUES","INDUSTRIAL_GPREVENUES","TRANS_GPREVENUES","TOTAL_GPREVENUES","RESIDENTIAL_GPGENERATION","COMMERCIAL_GPGENERATION","INDUSTRIAL_GPGENERATION","TRANS_GPGENERATION","TOTAL_GPGENERATION","RESIDENTIAL_GPCUSTOMERS","COMMERCIAL_GPCUSTOMERS","INDUSTRIAL_GPCUSTOMERS","TRANS_GPCUSTOMERS","TOTAL_GPCUSTOMERS" 2013,1,"AK",3522,"Chugach Electric Assn Inc",0,,,,0,0,,,,0,0,,,,0 2013,1,"AL",195,"Alabama Power Co",2.507,0.063,,,2.57,55.7,1.4,,,57.1,628,12,,,640 2013,1,"AL",4958,"Decatur Utilities",0.14,0.1,0,0,0.24,5.25,3.75,0,0,9,19,1,0,0,20 2013,1,"AL",6422,"City of Florence - (AL)",0.368,0,0,0,0.368,13.8,0,0,0,13.8,50,0,0,0,50 2013,1,"AL",9094,"City of Huntsville - (AL)",8.632,1.64,0,0,10.272,323.7,61.5,0,0,385.2,1022,4,0,0,1026 2013,1,"AL",9739,"Joe Wheeler Elec Member Corp",0.188,0,0,0,0.188,7.05,0,0,0,7.05,20,0,0,0,20 2013,1,"AR",14063,"Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co",0.314,0.222,0.029,0,0.565,86.294,63.454,8.333,0,158.081,88,1,1,0,90 2013,1,"AZ",803,"Arizona Public Service Co",8.198,35.475,,,43.673,2049.62,8868.77,,,10918.39,2739,85,,,2824 2013,1,"AZ",16572,"Salt River Project",,5.429,,,5.429,,502,,,502,,8,,,8 2013,1,"AZ",19189,"Trico Electric Cooperative Inc",0.01,,,,0.01,0.25,,,,0.25,3,,,,3 2013,1,"AZ",19728,"UNS Electric, Inc",1.471,0.077,,,1.548,44.83,2.74,,,47.57,248,7,,,255 2013,1,"AZ",24211,"Tucson Electric Power Co",18.123,2.247,0.399,,20.769,657.86,173.23,5.3,,836.39,2619,62,2,,2683 2013,1,"CA",11208,"Los Angeles Department of Water & Power",64.746,109.462,0.47,,174.678,2158.218,3648.722,15.676,,5822.616,16536,614,28,,17178 2013,1,"CA",12745,"Modesto Irrigation District",0.122,,,,0.122,0.639,,,,0.639,1,,,,1 2013,1,"CA",14328,"Pacific Gas & Electric Co",0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,0 2013,1,"CA",14354,"PacifiCorp",5.272,0.451,0.016,0,5.739,274.699,23.147,0.8,0,298.646,1223,38,2,0,1263 2013,1,"CA",14534,"City of Pasadena - (CA)",16.888,14.845,0,0,31.733,675.458,593.795,0,0,1269.253,1043,53,0,0,1096 2013,1,"CA",16534,"Sacramento Municipal Util Dist",219.094,7.646,63.401,,290.141,33465.982,771.746,7565.049,,41802.777,53171,1423,646,,55240 2013,1,"CA",17612,"Bear Valley Electric Service",0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 2013,1,"CA",18260,"Surprise Valley Electrificatio",0.045,0,0,0,0.045,1.8,0,0,0,1.8,9,0,0,0,9 2013,1,"CA",19281,"Turlock Irrigation District",0.015,,0.122,,0.137,2.99,,24.36,,27.35,6,,1,,7 2013,1,"CO",3989,"City of Colorado Springs - (CO)",2.513,0.654,,,3.167,235.6,33.8,,,269.4,743,16,,,759 2013,1,"CO",6604,"City of Fort Collins - (CO)",19.565,9.057,11.83,0,40.452,858.504,397.43,587.373,0,1843.307,1257,95,3,0,1355 2013,1,"CO",9336,"Intermountain Rural Elec Assn",0.418,,,,0.418,29,,,,29,43,,,,43 2013,1,"CO",12866,"Moon Lake Electric Assn Inc",0.036,,,,0.036,1.92,,,,1.92,4,,,,4 2013,1,"CO",15257,"Poudre Valley R E A, Inc",0.436,0.036,1.399,0,1.871,484.511,40.533,1554.178,0,2079.222,636,17,1,0,654 2013,1,"CO",15466,"Public Service Co of Colorado",277.472,142.981,,,420.453,12851.359,6623.167,,,19474.526,29441,788,,,30229 2013,1,"CO",16603,"San Luis Valley R E C, Inc",0.3,0.06,0.604,,0.964,75.1,15,151,,241.1,175,5,2,,182 2013,1,"CO",19499,"United Power, Inc",0.47,0.05,1.43,,1.95,527,50.4,1586.8,,2164.2,357,6,8,,371 2013,1,"CT",4176,"Connecticut Light & Power Co",181.909,23.844,0.747,0,206.5,19710.744,2410.9,75.421,0,22197.065,21408,371,7,0,21786 2013,1,"CT",7716,"Groton Dept of Utilities - (CT)",0.065,,,,0.065,5.9,,,,5.9,15,,,,15 2013,1,"CT",19497,"United Illuminating Co",41.54,,,,41.54,4237.62,,,,4237.62,5933,,,,5933 2013,1,"CT",20038,"Town of Wallingford - (CT)",1.688,0.113,0,0,1.801,153.447,10.274,0,0,163.721,230,4,0,0,234 2013,1,"DE",5070,"Delaware Electric Cooperative",0.059,,,,0.059,29.6,,,,29.6,35,,,,35 2013,1,"DE",13519,"City of Newark - (DE)",0.367,0,0,0,0.367,1751,0,0,0,1751,269,0,0,0,269 2013,1,"FL",18454,"Tampa Electric Co",13.23,2.89,0,0,16.12,529.2,115.6,0,0,644.8,2215,28,0,0,2243 2013,1,"GA",3408,"City of Chattanooga - (TN)",0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 2013,1,"GA",3916,"Cobb Electric Membership Corp",1.029,0.026,0.443,,1.498,30.881,0.765,13.3,,44.946,151,3,1,,155 2013,1,"GA",7140,"Georgia Power Co",27.42,16.46,22.46,,66.34,670,1430,2346,,4446,4107,44,6,,4157 2013,1,"GA",9601,"Jackson Electric Member Corp - (GA)",2.282,0.075,0.646,0,3.003,76.05,3,25.84,0,104.89,507,2,2,0,511 2013,1,"IA",9417,"Interstate Power and Light Co",45.4,2.9,,,48.3,5570.9,144.7,,,5715.6,6107,568,,,6675 2013,1,"ID",9191,"Idaho Power Co",10.229,5.453,0.017,,15.699,1203,642,2,,1847,2034,67,2,,2103 2013,1,"ID",11273,"Lower Valley Energy Inc",0.105,,,,0.105,9.006,,,,9.006,23,,,,23 2013,1,"ID",14354,"PacifiCorp",4.106,0.431,0.002,0,4.539,211.627,23.68,0.1,0,235.407,1167,27,1,0,1195 2013,1,"ID",20169,"Avista Corp",3.747,0.748,0,0,4.495,1124.1,224.4,0,0,1348.5,965,40,0,0,1005 2013,1,"IN",9273,"Indianapolis Power & Light Co",6.442,0.571,14.835,,21.848,4294.886,380.52,9890.167,,14565.573,4170,129,24,,4323 2013,1,"IN",15470,"Duke Energy Indiana Inc",8.128,,,,8.128,406.5,,,,406.5,1309,,,,1309 2013,1,"KS",10000,"Kansas City Power & Light Co",0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 2013,1,"KS",10005,"Kansas Gas & Electric Co",0.131,,,,0.131,13.1,,,,13.1,35,,,,35 2013,1,"KS",22500,"Westar Energy Inc",0.12,0.022,1.1,0,1.242,12,2.2,110,,124.2,37,1,1,,39 2013,1,"KY",10171,"Kentucky Utilities Co",2.69,0.085,0.004,0,2.779,795,25,1,0,821,536,18,1,0,555 2013,1,"KY",11249,"Louisville Gas & Electric Co",4.55,0.12,0,0,4.67,1330,38,0,0,1368,926,11,0,0,937 2013,1,"KY",14724,"Pennyrile Rural Electric Coop",0.212,0,0,0,0.212,7.95,0,0,0,7.95,37,0,0,0,37 2013,1,"KY",17564,"South Kentucky Rural E C C",0.539,0.003,,,0.542,19.6,0.1,,,19.7,172,1,,,173 2013,1,"KY",19446,"Duke Energy Kentucky",0.507,,,,0.507,47.6,,,,47.6,116,,,,116 2013,1,"KY",20130,"Warren Rural Elec Coop Corp",0.088,0.02,0,0,0.108,3.3,0.75,0,0,4.05,14,1,0,0,15 2013,1,"MA",11804,"Massachusetts Electric Co",74.761,2.618,0.018,0,77.397,3332.112,103.699,0.717,0,3436.528,5179,199,3,0,5381 2013,1,"MA",13206,"Nantucket Electric Co",0.342,0.243,0,0,0.585,13.526,9.159,0,0,22.685,31,8,0,0,39 2013,1,"MI",3828,"Cloverland Electric Co-op",0.1,,,,0.1,10.858,,,,10.858,36,,,,36 2013,1,"MI",4254,"Consumers Energy Co",41,14,7,,62,41,1817,88,,1946,14389,114,3,,14506 2013,1,"MI",5109,"The DTE Electric Company",97,5,18,0,120,4283,225,887,0,5395,23341,113,25,0,23479 2013,1,"MI",10704,"City of Lansing - (MI)",2.922,0.818,0.007,0,3.747,97.5,27.25,0.25,0,125,390,109,1,0,500 2013,1,"MI",13780,"Northern States Power Co",0.091,,,,0.091,7.595,,,,7.595,15,,,,15 2013,1,"MI",19578,"Upper Peninsula Power Co",0.613,0,0,0,0.613,25.55,0,0,0,25.55,119,0,0,0,119 2013,1,"MI",20847,"Wisconsin Electric Power Co",2.14,0.091,0,0,2.231,71,3,0,0,74,275,5,0,0,280 2013,1,"MI",20860,"Wisconsin Public Service Corp",0.073,0.005,0,0,0.078,4.7,0.3,0,0,5,17,1,0,0,18 2013,1,"MN",689,"Connexus Energy",1.807,0.092,5.968,0,7.867,371.7,15,978.296,0,1364.996,471,3,1,0,475 2013,1,"MN",5574,"East Central Energy",1.255,0.07,0,0,1.325,313.8,17.6,0,0,331.4,894,24,0,0,918 2013,1,"MN",9417,"Interstate Power and Light Co",4.2,0.1,,,4.3,556.5,5.3,,,561.8,549,55,,,604 2013,1,"MN",12647,"Minnesota Power Inc",2.843,0.608,,,3.451,113.7,22.3,,,136,618,16,,,634 2013,1,"MN",13781,"Northern States Power Co - Minnesota",299.015,244.218,,,543.233,8470.68,6918.365,,,15389.045,20885,240,,,21125 2013,1,"MN",14232,"Otter Tail Power Co",0.767,1.078,0,0,1.845,59,82.9,0,0,141.9,263,32,0,0,295 2013,1,"MN",16181,"Rochester Public Utilities",0.165,0.074,0,0,0.239,47.042,18.417,0,0,65.459,66,1,0,0,67 2013,1,"MN",20996,"Wright-Hennepin Coop Elec Assn",0.334,8.149,,,8.483,33.4,814.9,,,848.3,79,1,,,80 2013,1,"MN",25177,"Dakota Electric Association",2.238,0.059,1.557,,3.854,559.5,14.8,389.2,,963.5,1365,82,22,,1469 2013,1,"MO",4675,"Cuivre River Electric Coop Inc",0.943,0.035,,,0.978,37.7,1.4,,,39.1,142,2,,,144 2013,1,"MO",10000,"Kansas City Power & Light Co",0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 2013,1,"MO",12698,"KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Co.",0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 2013,1,"MO",17833,"City Utilities of Springfield - (MO)",0.842,0.13,0,0,0.972,35.7,7.9,0,0,43.6,149,8,0,0,157 2013,1,"MO",19436,"Union Electric Co - (MO)",71.2,,,,71.2,4748,,,,4748,6868,,,,6868 2013,1,"MS",6641,"4-County Electric Power Assn",0.204,0,0,0,0.204,7.65,0,0,0,7.65,25,0,0,0,25 2013,1,"MS",12686,"Mississippi Power Co",0.02,,,,0.02,0.4,,,,0.4,2,,,,2 2013,1,"MS",19273,"City of Tupelo - (MS)",0.04,1,0,0,1.04,1.5,37.5,0,0,39,5,1,0,0,6 2013,1,"MT",6395,"Flathead Electric Coop Inc",1.63,,,,1.63,326,,,,326,326,,,,326 2013,1,"MT",12825,"NorthWestern Energy LLC - (MT)",1.952,3.266,0,0,5.218,97.6,163.3,0,0,260.9,307,19,0,0,326 2013,1,"MT",20997,"Yellowstone Valley Elec Co-op",0.02,,,,0.02,0.5,,,,0.5,12,,,,12 2013,1,"NC",3046,"Progress Energy Carolinas Inc",19.469,0.904,0.096,,20.469,486.729,36.16,3.84,,526.729,3298,83,2,,3383 2013,1,"NC",5416,"Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC",32.928,8.54,,,41.468,823.2,213.5,,,1036.7,5901,179,,,6080 2013,1,"NC",6235,"Public Works Comm-City of Fayetteville",0.308,0,0,0,0.308,7.7,0,0,0,7.7,57,0,0,0,57 2013,1,"NC",9837,"Jones-Onslow Elec Member Corp",0.196,,,,0.196,4.9,,,,4.9,49,,,,49 2013,1,"NC",16496,"Rutherford Elec Member Corp",0.14,,,,0.14,3.5,,,,3.5,24,,,,24 2013,1,"NC",24889,"Brunswick Electric Member Corp",0.329,0,0,0,0.329,8.225,0,0,0,8.225,71,0,0,0,71 2013,1,"ND",12087,"McKenzie Electric Coop Inc",0.001,,,,0.001,0.1,,,,0.1,1,,,,1 2013,1,"ND",14232,"Otter Tail Power Co",0.511,0.12,0,0,0.631,39.321,9.2,0,0,48.521,195,14,0,0,209 2013,1,"NH",13441,"New Hampshire Elec Coop Inc",1.689,0.057,0,0,1.746,56.3,1.9,0,0,58.2,236,7,0,0,243 2013,1,"NH",15472,"Public Service Co of NH",2.406,0.47,0.105,0,2.981,101.332,46.972,3.798,0,152.102,158,9,2,0,169 2013,1,"NH",24590,"Unitil Energy Systems",0.463,0.004,0,0,0.467,14.438,0.065,0,0,14.503,25,1,0,0,26 2013,1,"NH",26510,"Granite State Electric Co",1.135,0.074,,,1.209,29.382,2.324,,,31.706,103,7,,,110 2013,1,"NJ",963,"Atlantic City Electric Co",6.266,1.458,0,0,7.724,477.501,79.252,0,0,556.753,771,12,0,0,783 2013,1,"NJ",16213,"Rockland Electric Co",1.784,0.006,0,0,1.79,131.281,0.667,0,0,131.948,119,1,0,0,120 2013,1,"NM",5701,"El Paso Electric Co",0.671,2.023,0,0,2.694,11.5,64.6,0,0,76.1,62,15,0,0,77 2013,1,"NM",6204,"City of Farmington - (NM)",0.035,0,0,0,0.035,1.9,0,0,0,1.9,6,0,0,0,6 2013,1,"NM",11204,"Los Alamos County",0.885,0.052,,,0.937,157.6,11.039,,,168.639,3333,10,,,3343 2013,1,"NM",15473,"Public Service Co of NM",21.724,4.901,1.134,0,27.759,5172.37,1166.87,269.91,0,6609.15,12248,464,3,0,12715 2013,1,"NM",17718,"Southwestern Public Service Co",12.153,1.439,,,13.592,405.088,47.982,,,453.07,827,91,,,918 2013,1,"NV",13073,"Mt Wheeler Power, Inc",0.12,0.002,,,0.122,6.2,0.1,,,6.3,21,1,,,22 2013,1,"NY",11171,"Long Island Power Authority",11.169,1.617,,,12.786,409,587,,,996,540,140,,,680 2013,1,"NY",13511,"New York State Elec & Gas Corp",100.211,4.478,1.008,,105.697,4048,213,47,,4308,14873,255,6,,15134 2013,1,"NY",13573,"Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.",103.04,2.12,1.06,0,106.22,5970,123,62,0,6155,8045,166,83,0,8294 2013,1,"NY",16183,"Rochester Gas & Electric Corp",37.822,0.735,,,38.557,1535.1,40.692,,,1575.792,5567,73,,,5640 2013,1,"OH",3542,"Duke Energy Ohio Inc",2.756,,,,2.756,275.6,,,,275.6,634,,,,634 2013,1,"OH",14006,"Ohio Power Co",0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 2013,1,"OK",7490,"Grand River Dam Authority",0,0,54.776,,54.776,0,0,13694,,13694,0,0,1,,1 2013,1,"OK",13734,"Northeast Oklahoma Electric Co",0.218,0.004,0,0,0.222,26.6,0.5,0,0,27.1,152,3,0,0,155 2013,1,"OK",14062,"Oklahoma Electric Coop Inc",0.824,0,0,0,0.824,164.9,0,0,0,164.9,1649,0,0,0,1649 2013,1,"OK",14063,"Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co",171.747,317.054,16.633,0,505.434,7733.377,19106.41,1935.612,0,28775.399,9681,837,38,0,10556 2013,1,"OK",15474,"Public Service Co of Oklahoma",15.434,0.336,0,0,15.77,457.587,9.634,0,0,467.221,673,8,0,0,681 2013,1,"OR",1738,"Bonneville Power Administration",0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 2013,1,"OR",6022,"City of Eugene - (OR)",23.141,12.428,0,0,35.569,2226,1153,0,0,3379,2443,246,0,0,2689 2013,1,"OR",9191,"Idaho Power Co",0.093,,,,0.093,11,,,,11,18,,,,18 2013,1,"OR",14354,"PacifiCorp",408.297,81.386,27.237,0,516.92,35002.862,8816.17,3558.931,0,47377.963,41305,1371,65,0,42741 2013,1,"OR",15248,"Portland General Electric Co",806.261,27.751,101.307,0,935.319,76384.997,2622.585,5959.253,0,84966.835,85894,1947,145,0,87986 2013,1,"OR",40437,"Emerald People's Utility Dist",12.284,6.469,0,0,18.753,1535.477,808.62,0,0,2344.097,34,34,0,0,68 2013,1,"PA",14715,"PPL Electric Utilities Corp",2.59,,,,2.59,103.7,,,,103.7,335,,,,335 2013,1,"PA",14940,"PECO Energy Co",0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 2013,1,"RI",13214,"The Narragansett Electric Co",60.105,1.484,0.044,0,61.633,2596.708,58.236,1.626,0,2656.57,4021,102,1,0,4124 2013,1,"SC",1613,"Berkeley Electric Coop Inc",1.317,0.03,0,0,1.347,43.9,0.439,0,0,44.339,333,4,,,337 2013,1,"SC",3046,"Progress Energy Carolinas Inc",0.229,0.028,,,0.257,5.723,1.12,,,6.843,47,2,,,49 2013,1,"SC",5416,"Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC",0.596,0.004,,,0.6,14.9,0.1,,,15,110,1,,,111 2013,1,"SC",14398,"Palmetto Electric Coop Inc",2.034,2.411,2.454,0,6.899,67.8,105.317,81.8,0,254.917,458,30,3,0,491 2013,1,"SC",17539,"South Carolina Electric&Gas Co",1.037,0,226.131,0,227.168,25.925,0,8228.212,0,8254.137,192,0,2,0,194 2013,1,"SC",17543,"South Carolina Public Service Authority",9.441,26.736,0.287,0,36.464,298.9,891.2,9.583,0,1199.683,1600,396,1,0,1997 2013,1,"SD",14232,"Otter Tail Power Co",0.315,0.23,0,0,0.545,8.2,6,0,0,14.2,41,5,0,0,46 2013,1,"SD",20401,"West River Electric Assn Inc",0.034,,,,0.034,17.1,,,,17.1,80,,,,80 2013,1,"TN",727,"Appalachian Electric Coop",0.292,0.1,0,0,0.392,10.95,3.75,0,0,14.7,36,1,0,0,37 2013,1,"TN",2247,"City of Bristol - (TN)",0.192,0.012,0,0,0.204,7.2,0.45,0,0,7.65,18,3,0,0,21 2013,1,"TN",3408,"City of Chattanooga - (TN)",5.912,6.292,0,0,12.204,221.7,235.95,0,0,457.65,816,29,0,0,845 2013,1,"TN",3704,"City of Clarksville - (TN)",0.696,1.74,0,0,2.436,26.1,65.25,0,0,91.35,91,5,0,0,96 2013,1,"TN",3758,"City of Cleveland - (TN)",0.208,0,0,0,0.208,7.8,0,0,0,7.8,34,0,0,0,34 2013,1,"TN",3812,"City of Clinton - (TN)",0.408,0.344,0,0,0.752,15.3,12.9,0,0,28.2,57,5,0,0,62 2013,1,"TN",4624,"Cumberland Elec Member Corp",1.152,0.152,0,0,1.304,43.2,5.7,0,0,48.9,165,7,0,0,172 2013,1,"TN",5399,"Duck River Elec Member Corp",1.324,2.296,0,0,3.62,49.65,86.1,0,0,135.75,175,8,0,0,183 2013,1,"TN",7174,"Gibson Electric Members Corp",0.2,0.1,0,0,0.3,7.5,3.75,0,0,11.25,39,1,0,0,40 2013,1,"TN",7625,"City of Greeneville - (TN)",0.052,0.1,0,0,0.152,1.95,3.75,0,0,5.7,10,1,0,0,11 2013,1,"TN",9777,"Johnson City - (TN)",2.552,0.472,0,0,3.024,95.7,17.7,0,0,113.4,335,8,0,0,343 2013,1,"TN",10421,"Knoxville Utilities Board",19.256,26.664,0,0,45.92,700.5,1262.4,0,0,1962.9,2245,69,0,0,2314 2013,1,"TN",10906,"City of Lenoir - (TN)",3.588,0.212,0,0,3.8,115.35,7.05,0,0,122.4,362,9,0,0,371 2013,1,"TN",12293,"City of Memphis - (TN)",17.07,1.986,4.812,0,23.868,426.75,49.65,120.3,0,596.7,1308,21,3,0,1332 2013,1,"TN",12470,"Middle Tennessee E M C",4.836,0.872,0,0,5.708,181.35,32.7,0,0,214.05,550,13,0,0,563 2013,1,"TN",13216,"Nashville Electric Service",21.372,7.504,0,0,28.876,801.45,281.4,0,0,1082.85,2429,63,0,0,2492 2013,1,"TN",17694,"Southwest Tennessee E M C",0.196,0.02,0,0,0.216,7.35,0.75,0,0,8.1,18,1,0,0,19 2013,1,"TN",19574,"Upper Cumberland E M C",0.392,0.048,0,0,0.44,14.7,1.8,0,0,16.5,29,3,0,0,32 2013,1,"TN",19898,"Volunteer Electric Coop",0.8,0.388,0,0,1.188,30,14.55,0,0,44.55,93,7,0,0,100 2013,1,"TX",5701,"El Paso Electric Co",2.823,0.088,0,0,2.911,79.9,2.5,0,0,82.4,370,6,0,0,376 2013,1,"TX",16604,"City of San Antonio - (TX)",48.654,51.084,0.384,0,100.122,4425.609,5090.967,38.376,0,9554.952,6462,557,1,0,7020 2013,1,"UT",12866,"Moon Lake Electric Assn Inc",0.148,0.022,,,0.17,7.99,1.212,,,9.202,17,1,,,18 2013,1,"UT",13073,"Mt Wheeler Power, Inc",0.021,,,,0.021,1.1,,,,1.1,2,,,,2 2013,1,"UT",14354,"PacifiCorp",158.394,33.901,9.139,0,201.434,8152.211,2846.716,1173.5,0,12172.427,35413,807,25,0,36245 2013,1,"UT",17874,"City of St George",0.084,0,0,0,0.084,2.84,0,0,0,2.84,8,0,0,0,8 2013,1,"VA",733,"Appalachian Power Co",0.221,,,,0.221,14.76,,,,14.76,11,,,,11 2013,1,"VA",17066,"Shenandoah Valley Elec Coop",0.213,0,0,0,0.213,14.246,0,0,0,14.246,12,0,0,0,12 2013,1,"VA",19876,"Virginia Electric & Power Co",166.416,14.353,0.762,0,181.531,12801.234,3064.185,58.615,0,15924.034,15248,226,1,0,15475 2013,1,"VT",7601,"Green Mountain Power Corp",39.65,10.83,0,0,50.48,1068,276,0,0,1344,3998,216,0,0,4214 2013,1,"WA",1738,"Bonneville Power Administration",0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 2013,1,"WA",14354,"PacifiCorp",10.666,3.788,0.006,0,14.46,547.74,316.508,0.3,0,864.548,2669,112,3,0,2784 2013,1,"WA",15500,"Puget Sound Energy Inc",334.185,64.655,0,0,398.84,26734.802,9103.828,0,0,35838.63,34030,959,0,0,34989 2013,1,"WA",17470,"Snohomish County PUD No 1",,2.091,,,2.091,,243.95,,,243.95,,16,,,16 2013,1,"WA",18429,"City of Tacoma - (WA)",6.11,2.57,0,0,8.68,509,214,0,0,723,1161,21,0,0,1182 2013,1,"WA",20169,"Avista Corp",9.34,5.835,0.144,0,15.319,2802,1750.5,43.2,0,4595.7,2374,64,2,0,2440 2013,1,"WI",5574,"East Central Energy",0.109,0,0,0,0.109,27.3,0,0,0,27.3,88,0,0,0,88 2013,1,"WI",11479,"Madison Gas & Electric Co",158,111,1,,270,5110,5939,29,,11078,12045,951,9,,13005 2013,1,"WI",13780,"Northern States Power Co",8.698,4.609,,,13.307,634.884,336.445,,,971.329,1277,55,,,1332 2013,1,"WI",20847,"Wisconsin Electric Power Co",166.97,40.3,44.391,0,251.661,9264,2329,3139,0,14732,18251,601,23,0,18875 2013,1,"WI",20856,"Wisconsin Power & Light Co",72.336,8.4,,,80.736,5682.6,417.2,,,6099.8,7122,971,,,8093 2013,1,"WI",20860,"Wisconsin Public Service Corp",13.098,8.448,0,0,21.546,545.77,352,0,0,897.77,1838,56,0,0,1894 2013,1,"WV",733,"Appalachian Power Co",0.011,,,,0.011,0.7,,,,0.7,2,,,,2 2013,1,"WY",3461,"Cheyenne Light Fuel & Power Co",0.291,0.581,,,0.872,8.314,16.6,,,24.914,28,7,,,35 2013,1,"WY",7222,"City of Gillette - (WY)",0.45,0.492,0,0,0.942,30,32.8,0,0,62.8,39,6,0,0,45 2013,1,"WY",11273,"Lower Valley Energy Inc",12.326,4.929,9.552,,26.807,1059.429,504.749,1138.606,,2702.784,1126,387,33,,1546 2013,1,"WY",14354,"PacifiCorp",15.753,0.84,0.903,0,17.496,814.892,43.2,110.8,0,968.892,3839,105,3,0,3947 2013,1,"WY",19156,"Powder River Energy Corp",0.032,0.028,,,0.06,16.2,13.8,,,30,24,2,,,26 2013,1,,99999,"National Total",4792.148,1589.407,655.869,0,7037.424,350819.302,108835.977,66013.422,0,525668.701,603911,18477,1249,0,623637 2013,2,"AL",195,"Alabama Power Co",2.558,0.072,,,2.63,56.85,1.6,,,58.45,634,12,,,646 2013,2,"AL",4958,"Decatur Utilities",0.14,0.1,0,0,0.24,5.25,3.75,0,0,9,19,1,0,0,20 2013,2,"AL",6422,"City of Florence - (AL)",0.36,0,0,0,0.36,13.5,0,0,0,13.5,49,0,0,0,49 2013,2,"AL",9094,"City of Huntsville - (AL)",8.544,1.64,0,0,10.184,320.4,61.5,0,0,381.9,1013,4,0,0,1017 2013,2,"AL",9739,"Joe Wheeler Elec Member Corp",0.188,0,0,0,0.188,7.05,0,0,0,7.05,20,0,0,0,20 2013,2,"AR",14063,"Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co",0.279,0.235,0.029,0,0.543,76.151,67.134,8.333,0,151.618,85,2,1,0,88 2013,2,"AZ",803,"Arizona Public Service Co",7.164,40.617,,,47.781,1791.018,10154.21,,,11945.228,2714,84,,,2798 2013,2,"AZ",16572,"Salt River Project",,5.044,,,5.044,,466,,,466,,8,,,8 2013,2,"AZ",19189,"Trico Electric Cooperative Inc",0.01,,,,0.01,0.25,,,,0.25,3,,,,3 2013,2,"AZ",19728,"UNS Electric, Inc",1.387,0.077,,,1.464,43.63,2.74,,,46.37,236,7,,,243 2013,2,"AZ",24211,"Tucson Electric Power Co",15.866,2.383,0.399,,18.648,575.93,180.79,5.3,,762.02,2533,60,2,,2595 2013,2,"CA",11208,"Los Angeles Department of Water & Power",67.077,105.929,0.395,,173.401,2235.918,3530.96,13.174,,5780.052,16512,627,17,,17156 2013,2,"CA",12745,"Modesto Irrigation District",0.116,,,,0.116,0.605,,,,0.605,1,,,,1 2013,2,"CA",14354,"PacifiCorp",5.193,0.449,0.016,0,5.658,267.638,23.03,0.8,0,291.468,1220,38,2,0,1260 2013,2,"CA",14534,"City of Pasadena - (CA)",9.243,6.621,,,15.864,369.68,264.838,,,634.518,567,23,,,590 2013,2,"CA",16534,"Sacramento Municipal Util Dist",194.815,6.859,60.348,,262.022,26474.29,693.025,6049.057,,33216.372,53268,1414,645,,55327 2013,2,"CA",17612,"Bear Valley Electric Service",0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 2013,2,"CA",18260,"Surprise Valley Electrificatio",0.03,0,0,0,0.03,1.2,0,0,0,1.2,6,0,0,0,6 2013,2,"CA",19281,"Turlock Irrigation District",0.015,,0.147,,0.162,2.995,,29.36,,32.355,6,,1,,7 2013,2,"CO",3989,"City of Colorado Springs - (CO)",5.488,0.512,10.578,,16.578,532.7,38.8,269.5,,841,1116,13,3,,1132 2013,2,"CO",6604,"City of Fort Collins - (CO)",16.784,10.696,0.557,0,28.037,659.762,420.421,21.875,0,1102.058,1185,92,2,0,1279 2013,2,"CO",9336,"Intermountain Rural Elec Assn",0.418,,,,0.418,30,,,,30,44,,,,44 2013,2,"CO",12866,"Moon Lake Electric Assn Inc",0.066,,,,0.066,3.58,,,,3.58,4,,,,4 2013,2,"CO",15257,"Poudre Valley R E A, Inc",0.421,0.036,1.316,,1.773,467.667,40.533,1462.156,,1970.356,635,17,1,,653 2013,2,"CO",15466,"Public Service Co of Colorado",218.716,126.556,,,345.272,10129.88,5862.309,,,15992.189,29402,784,,,30186 2013,2,"CO",16603,"San Luis Valley R E C, Inc",0.296,0.065,0.604,,0.965,73.9,16.2,151,,241.1,168,12,2,,182 2013,2,"CO",19499,"United Power, Inc",0.47,0.05,2.16,,2.68,520.4,50.5,2401,,2971.9,355,6,8,,369 2013,2,"CT",4176,"Connecticut Light & Power Co",174.364,22.601,0.693,0,197.658,18933.921,2287.732,69.942,0,21291.595,21539,368,10,0,21917 2013,2,"CT",7716,"Groton Dept of Utilities - (CT)",0.065,,,,0.065,5.9,,,,5.9,15,,,,15 2013,2,"CT",19497,"United Illuminating Co",42.21,,,,42.21,4305.87,,,,4305.87,5935,,,,5935 2013,2,"CT",20038,"Town of Wallingford - (CT)",1.547,0.121,0,0,1.668,140.6,11.027,0,0,151.627,228,4,0,0,232 2013,2,"DE",5070,"Delaware Electric Cooperative",0.059,,,,0.059,29.6,,,,29.6,35,,,,35 2013,2,"DE",13519,"City of Newark - (DE)",0.367,0,0,0,0.367,1751,0,0,0,1751,269,0,0,0,269 2013,2,"FL",18454,"Tampa Electric Co",13.18,2.88,0,0,16.06,527.2,115.2,0,0,642.4,2206,26,0,0,2232 2013,2,"GA",3408,"City of Chattanooga - (TN)",0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 2013,2,"GA",3916,"Cobb Electric Membership Corp",0.907,0.023,0.4,,1.33,27.202,0.69,12.013,,39.905,151,3,1,,155 2013,2,"GA",7140,"Georgia Power Co",27.53,17,22.46,,66.99,672,1431,2346,,4449,4122,42,6,,4170 2013,2,"GA",9601,"Jackson Electric Member Corp - (GA)",2.282,0.075,0.544,0,2.901,76.05,3,21.768,0,100.818,507,2,2,0,511 2013,2,"IA",9417,"Interstate Power and Light Co",39.3,2.9,,,42.2,4816,143.8,,,4959.8,6097,563,,,6660 2013,2,"ID",9191,"Idaho Power Co",10.104,5.557,0.017,0,15.678,1189,654,2,0,1845,2018,66,2,0,2086 2013,2,"ID",11273,"Lower Valley Energy Inc",0.105,,,,0.105,9.076,,,,9.076,23,,,,23 2013,2,"ID",14354,"PacifiCorp",4.172,0.401,0.002,0,4.575,213.241,23.797,0.1,0,237.138,1161,27,1,0,1189 2013,2,"ID",20169,"Avista Corp",3.735,0.748,0,0,4.483,1120.5,224.4,0,0,1344.9,968,40,0,0,1008 2013,2,"IN",9273,"Indianapolis Power & Light Co",4.498,0.444,8.201,,13.143,2998.883,293.547,5469.37,,8761.8,4188,128,25,,4341 2013,2,"IN",15470,"Duke Energy Indiana Inc",7.967,,,,7.967,796.7,,,,796.7,1304,,,,1304 2013,2,"KS",10000,"Kansas City Power & Light Co",0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 2013,2,"KS",10005,"Kansas Gas & Electric Co",0.131,,,,0.131,13.1,,,,13.1,34,,,,34 2013,2,"KS",22500,"Westar Energy Inc",0.117,0.022,1,,1.139,11.7,2.2,100,,113.9,36,1,1,,38 2013,2,"KY",10171,"Kentucky Utilities Co",6.795,0.212,0.009,0,7.016,3808,119,5,0,3932,536,18,1,0,555 2013,2,"KY",11249,"Louisville Gas & Electric Co",10.98,0.243,0.067,0,11.29,6149,137,38,0,6324,914,11,1,0,926 2013,2,"KY",14724,"Pennyrile Rural Electric Coop",0.212,0,0,0,0.212,7.95,0,0,0,7.95,37,0,0,0,37 2013,2,"KY",17564,"South Kentucky Rural E C C",0.539,0.003,0,0,0.542,19.6,0.1,0,0,19.7,172,1,0,0,173 2013,2,"KY",19446,"Duke Energy Kentucky",0.521,,,,0.521,49,,,,49,118,,,,118 2013,2,"KY",20130,"Warren Rural Elec Coop Corp",0.088,0.02,0,0,0.108,3.3,0.75,0,0,4.05,14,1,0,0,15 2013,2,"MA",11804,"Massachusetts Electric Co",69.404,2.75,0.014,0,72.168,3070.386,106.677,0.559,0,3177.622,5183,208,3,0,5394 2013,2,"MA",13206,"Nantucket Electric Co",0.336,0.245,0,0,0.581,13.056,9.301,0,0,22.357,32,7,0,0,39 2013,2,"MI",3828,"Cloverland Electric Co-op",0.1,,,,0.1,10.87,,,,10.87,34,,,,34 2013,2,"MI",4254,"Consumers Energy Co",40,13,1,,54,4013,1809,88,,5910,18636,95,2,,18733 2013,2,"MI",5109,"The DTE Electric Company",87,4,16,0,107,3785,177,799,0,4761,21658,109,25,0,21792 2013,2,"MI",10704,"City of Lansing - (MI)",2.874,0.818,0.008,0,3.7,95.75,27.25,0.25,0,123.25,383,109,1,0,493 2013,2,"MI",13780,"Northern States Power Co",0.079,,,,0.079,6.56,,,,6.56,15,,,,15 2013,2,"MI",19578,"Upper Peninsula Power Co",0.607,,,,0.607,25.3,,,,25.3,118,,,,118 2013,2,"MI",20847,"Wisconsin Electric Power Co",1.549,0.086,,,1.635,51,3,,,54,269,5,,,274 2013,2,"MI",20860,"Wisconsin Public Service Corp",0.073,0.005,,,0.078,4.7,0.3,,,5,17,1,,,18 2013,2,"MN",689,"Connexus Energy",1.837,0.092,6.024,0,7.953,376.7,15,987.58,0,1379.28,471,3,1,0,475 2013,2,"MN",5574,"East Central Energy",1.255,0.07,0,0,1.325,313.8,17.6,0,0,331.4,894,24,0,0,918 2013,2,"MN",9417,"Interstate Power and Light Co",3.6,0.1,,,3.7,472.9,5.3,,,478.2,549,55,,,604 2013,2,"MN",12647,"Minnesota Power Inc",2.819,0.508,,,3.327,112.3,20.3,,,132.6,582,15,,,597 2013,2,"MN",13781,"Northern States Power Co - Minnesota",242.939,158.251,,,401.19,6882.134,4483.034,,,11365.168,20895,240,,,21135 2013,2,"MN",14232,"Otter Tail Power Co",0.672,1.063,0,0,1.735,51.724,81.8,0,0,133.524,245,30,0,0,275 2013,2,"MN",16181,"Rochester Public Utilities",0.165,0.074,0,0,0.239,47.043,18.417,0,0,65.46,66,1,0,0,67 2013,2,"MN",20996,"Wright-Hennepin Coop Elec Assn",0.334,9.596,,,9.93,33.4,959.6,,,993,79,1,,,80 2013,2,"MN",25177,"Dakota Electric Association",2.241,0.059,1.075,,3.375,560.2,14.8,268.7,,843.7,1363,82,22,,1467 2013,2,"MO",4675,"Cuivre River Electric Coop Inc",0.943,0.035,0,0,0.978,37.7,1.4,0,0,39.1,142,2,0,0,144 2013,2,"MO",10000,"Kansas City Power & Light Co",0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 2013,2,"MO",12698,"KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Co.",0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 2013,2,"MO",17833,"City Utilities of Springfield - (MO)",0.84,0.13,,,0.97,35.7,7.9,,,43.6,148,8,,,156 2013,2,"MO",19436,"Union Electric Co - (MO)",79.1,,,,79.1,5274,,,,5274,6871,,,,6871 2013,2,"MS",6641,"4-County Electric Power Assn",0.212,0,0,0,0.212,7.95,0,0,0,7.95,25,0,0,0,25 2013,2,"MS",12686,"Mississippi Power Co",0.02,,,,0.02,0.4,,,,0.4,2,,,,2 2013,2,"MS",19273,"City of Tupelo - (MS)",0.04,1,0,0,1.04,1.5,37.5,0,0,39,5,1,0,0,6 2013,2,"MT",6395,"Flathead Electric Coop Inc",1.63,,,,1.63,326,,,,326,326,,,,326 2013,2,"MT",12825,"NorthWestern Energy LLC - (MT)",1.954,3.266,0,0,5.22,97.7,163.3,0,0,261,307,19,0,0,326 2013,2,"MT",20997,"Yellowstone Valley Elec Co-op",0.02,,,,0.02,0.5,,,,0.5,12,,,,12 2013,2,"NC",3046,"Progress Energy Carolinas Inc",18.236,1.419,0.096,,19.751,455.892,56.772,3.84,,516.504,3285,84,2,,3371 2013,2,"NC",5416,"Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC",32.852,8.536,,,41.388,821.3,213.4,,,1034.7,5890,178,,,6068 2013,2,"NC",6235,"Public Works Comm-City of Fayetteville",0.34,0,0,0,0.34,8.5,0,0,0,8.5,57,0,0,0,57 2013,2,"NC",9837,"Jones-Onslow Elec Member Corp",0.188,0,0,0,0.188,4.7,0,0,0,4.7,47,0,0,0,47 2013,2,"NC",16496,"Rutherford Elec Member Corp",0.144,,,,0.144,3.6,,,,3.6,25,,,,25 2013,2,"NC",24889,"Brunswick Electric Member Corp",0.329,0,0,0,0.329,8.225,0,0,0,8.225,71,0,0,0,71 2013,2,"ND",12087,"McKenzie Electric Coop Inc",0.001,0,0,0,0.001,0.1,0,0,0,0.1,1,0,0,0,1 2013,2,"ND",14232,"Otter Tail Power Co",0.458,0.118,0,0,0.576,35.209,9.1,0,0,44.309,184,13,0,0,197 2013,2,"NH",13441,"New Hampshire Elec Coop Inc",1.683,0.057,0,0,1.74,56.1,1.9,0,0,58,236,7,0,0,243 2013,2,"NH",15472,"Public Service Co of NH",2.299,0.521,0.114,0,2.934,98.317,52.529,4.062,0,154.908,154,10,2,0,166 2013,2,"NH",24590,"Unitil Energy Systems",0.461,0.003,0,0,0.464,14.017,0.061,0,0,14.078,25,1,0,0,26 2013,2,"NH",26510,"Granite State Electric Co",1.135,0.074,0,0,1.209,29.382,2.324,0,0,31.706,103,7,0,0,110 2013,2,"NJ",963,"Atlantic City Electric Co",7.184,1.321,0,0,8.505,454.968,72.472,0,0,527.44,762,12,0,0,774 2013,2,"NJ",16213,"Rockland Electric Co",1.535,0.005,0,0,1.54,103.4,0.56,0,0,103.96,119,1,0,0,120 2013,2,"NM",5701,"El Paso Electric Co",0.671,2.023,0,0,2.694,11.5,64.6,0,0,76.1,61,15,0,0,76 2013,2,"NM",6204,"City of Farmington - (NM)",0.032,0,0,0,0.032,1.9,0,0,0,1.9,6,0,0,0,6 2013,2,"NM",11204,"Los Alamos County",0.682,0.097,,,0.779,118.828,17.435,,,136.263,293,11,,,304 2013,2,"NM",15473,"Public Service Co of NM",21.724,4.901,1.134,,27.759,5172.37,1166.87,269.91,,6609.15,12244,453,3,,12700 2013,2,"NM",17718,"Southwestern Public Service Co",8.89,1.962,,,10.852,296.337,65.408,,,361.745,820,91,,,911 2013,2,"NV",13073,"Mt Wheeler Power, Inc",0.12,0.002,,,0.122,6.2,0.1,,,6.3,21,1,,,22 2013,2,"NY",11171,"Long Island Power Authority",11.9,9.1,,,21,387,517,,,904,720,123,,,843 2013,2,"NY",13511,"New York State Elec & Gas Corp",100.014,4.473,1.008,0,105.495,4035,212,48,0,4295,14802,254,6,0,15062 2013,2,"NY",13573,"Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.",103.4,2.12,1.06,0,106.58,5970,123,62,0,6155,8045,166,83,0,8294 2013,2,"NY

  19. EV Community Readiness projects: New York City and Lower Hudson Valley Clean Communities, Inc. (NY, MA, PA); NYSERDA (ME, NH, VT, MA, RI, CT, NY, NJ, PA, DE, MD, DC)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting

  20. Assessment of microbial processes on radionuclide mobility in shallow land burial. [West Valley, NY; Beatty, Nevada; Maxey Flats, Kentucky

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Colombo, P.; Tate, R.L. III; Weiss, A.J.

    1982-07-01

    The impact of microbial metabolism of the organic substituents of low level radioactive wastes on radionuclide mobility in disposal sites, the nature of the microbial transformations involved in this metabolism and the effect of the prevailing environmental parameters on the quantities and types of metabolic intermediates accumulated were examined. Since both aerobic and anaerobic periods can occur during trench ecosystem development, oxidation capacities of the microbial community in the presence and absence of oxygen were analyzed. Results of gas studies performed at three commercial low level radioactive waste disposal sites were reviewed. Several deficiencies in available data were determined. Further research needs are suggested. This assessment has demonstrated that the biochemical capabilities expressed within the low level radioactive waste disposal site are common to a wide variety of soil bacteria. Hence, assuming trenches would not be placed in sites with such extreme abiotic conditions that all microbial activity is precluded, the microbial populations needed for colonization and decomposition of the organic waste substances are readily provided from the waste itself and from the soil of existing and any proposed disposal sites. Indeed, considering the ubiquity of occurrence of the microorganisms responsible for waste decomposition and the chemical nature of the organic waste material, long-term prevention of biodecomposition is difficult, if not impossible.

  1. Superfund record of decision amendment (EPA Region 2): Hooker (102nd Street Landfill), Niagara Falls, NY, June 9, 1995

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-08-01

    This decision document presents the selected modification to the original remedial action (PB91-921417) for the 102nd Street Landfill Site (the `Site`), located in Niagara Falls, New York. The modification to the selected remedy addresses the river sediments within the shallow embayment of the Niagara River adjacent to the Site. The major components of the modification to the selected remedy include: dredging the Niagara River sediments to the `clean line` with respect to Site-related contamination. These sediments, after dewatering, will NOT be incinerated, but will be consolidated on the landfill. Any NAPL found within these sediments will be extracted, and will be incinerated at an off-site facility.

  2. Superfund Record of Decision (EPA Region 2): Forest Glen Subdivision, Niagara Falls, NY. (First remedial action), December 1989

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1989-12-29

    The Forest Glen Subdivision site consists of 21 acres of developed residential properties and undeveloped land in Niagara Fall, Niagara County, New York. Land in the area surrounding the Forest Glen subdivision is used for residential and industrial purposes, including a mobile home park, small shopping mall, and the CECOS Landfill. Chemical companies reportedly disposed of wastes onsite from the early 1950s to the early 1970s. Sampling by EPA's Field Investigation Team revealed the presence of high concentrations of unknown and tentatively identified compounds (TICs) in August 1987, and further soil sampling was conducted to identify the TICs. EPA has executed interim measures to stabilize site conditions including collecting, staging, and securing drums in areas north and east of the subdivision and temporarily covering visibily contaminated soil with concrete. The remedial activity is the first of two planned operable units and addresses resident relocation only. A subsequent operable unit will address the remediation of site contamination once the relocation is complete.

  3. Superfund record of decision (EPA Region 2): Forest Glen subdivision, Operable Unit 2, Niagara Falls, NY, March 31, 1998

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1998-09-01

    This operable unit represents the second of three operable units planned for the site. It addresses the principal threats posed by the site through controlling the source of contamination. The major components of the selected remedy include: excavation of contaminated soils from the southern portion of the site, and contaminated sediment from East Gill Creek, and consolidation of these materials in the northern portion of the site followed by grading in preparation for placement of the cap; construction of an 8.5-acre cap over the consolidated soils in the northern portion of the site in conformance with the major elements described in 6 New York Code of Rules and Regulations Part 360 for solid waste landfill caps; removal and off-site disposal of the vacant trailers and two permanent homes to facilitate the excavation of soils; and capping the Wooded Wetland with six inches of clean sediment.

  4. BlocPower: Crowdsourced Microfinance for Energy Efficiency in Underserved Communities

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Lead Performer: BlocPower – New York, NY Partners: - New York State Energy Research and Development Authority – Albany, NY - Emerald Cities Collaborative-NY – New York, NY - Orrick, Herrington, & Sutcliffe – New York, NY - Open Society Foundations – New York, NY

  5. 2012 ARPA-E Energy Innovation Summit Keynote Presentation (Frederick W. Smith, FedEx Corporation), with Introduction by Senator Lamar Alexander (TN)

    ScienceCinema (OSTI)

    Smith, Frederick W. (FedEx Corporation, Chairman, President and CEO)

    2014-04-09

    The third annual ARPA-E Energy Innovation Summit was held in Washington D.C. in February, 2012. The event brought together key players from across the energy ecosystem - researchers, entrepreneurs, investors, corporate executives, and government officials - to share ideas for developing and deploying the next generation of energy technologies. Following introduction by Senator Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, Frederick W. Smith, Chairman, President, and CEO of FedEx Corporation, gave the third keynote presentation of the day.

  6. Microsoft PowerPoint - Camper, ORNL-TN CAB-04-2010-final, via Cate 4-19-10.ppt [Compatibility Mode]

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Chairs of the Environmental Management Site- Specific Advisory Board Specific Advisory Board Larry W. Camper, Director Division of Waste Management and Environmental Protection Off f S Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs April 28 2010 April 28, 2010 West Valley Demonstration Project * WVDP 1981 * WV Decommissioning Criteria * Interagency/Core Team Meetings * Review/Comment on Decommissioning Plan Review/Comment on Decommissioning Plan * Cooperating Agency

  7. DATA SHARING REPORT CHARACTERIZATION OF THE SURVEILLANCE AND MAINTENANCE PROJECT MISCELLANEOUS PROCESS INVENTORY WASTE ITEMS OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY, Oak Ridge TN

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Weaver, Phyllis C

    2013-12-12

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management (EM-OR) requested Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU), working under the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) contract, to provide technical and independent waste management planning support under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). Specifically, DOE EM-OR requested ORAU to plan and implement a sampling and analysis campaign to target certain items associated with URS|CH2M Oak Ridge, LLC (UCOR) surveillance and maintenance (S&M) process inventory waste. Eight populations of historical and reoccurring S&M waste at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) have been identified in the Waste Handling Plan for Surveillance and Maintenance Activities at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, DOE/OR/01-2565&D2 (WHP) (DOE 2012) for evaluation and processing for final disposal. This waste was generated during processing, surveillance, and maintenance activities associated with the facilities identified in the process knowledge (PK) provided in Appendix A. A list of items for sampling and analysis were generated from a subset of materials identified in the WHP populations (POPs) 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, plus a small number of items not explicitly addressed by the WHP. Specifically, UCOR S&M project personnel identified 62 miscellaneous waste items that would require some level of evaluation to identify the appropriate pathway for disposal. These items are highly diverse, relative to origin; composition; physical description; contamination level; data requirements; and the presumed treatment, storage, and disposal facility (TSDF). Because of this diversity, ORAU developed a structured approach to address item-specific data requirements necessary for acceptance in a presumed TSDF that includes the Environmental Management Waste Management Facility (EMWMF)using the approved Waste Lot (WL) 108.1 profilethe Y-12 Sanitary Landfill (SLF) if appropriate; EnergySolutions Clive; and the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) (ORAU 2013b). Finally, the evaluation of these wastes was more suited to a judgmental sampling approach rather than a statistical design, meaning data were collected for each individual item, thereby providing information for item-byitem disposition decisions. ORAU prepared a sampling and analysis plan (SAP) that outlined data collection strategies, methodologies, and analytical guidelines and requirements necessary for characterizing targeted items (ORAU 2013b). The SAP described an approach to collect samples that allowed evaluation as to whether or not the waste would be eligible for disposal at the EMWMF. If the waste was determined not to be eligible for EMWMF disposal, then there would be adequate information collected that would allow the waste to be profiled for one of the alternate TSDFs listed above.

  8. Data Sharing Report for the Quantification of Removable Activity in Various Surveillance and Maintenance Facilities at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge TN

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    King, David A

    2013-12-12

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management (OR-EM) requested that Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU), working under the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) contract, provide technical and independent waste management planning support using American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds. Specifically, DOE OR-EM requested that ORAU plan and implement a sampling and analysis campaign targeting potential removable radiological contamination that may be transferrable to future personal protective equipment (PPE) and contamination control materialscollectively referred to as PPE throughout the remainder of this reportused in certain URS|CH2M Oak Ridge, LLC (UCOR) Surveillance and Maintenance (S&M) Project facilities at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). Routine surveys in Bldgs. 3001, 3005, 3010, 3028, 3029, 3038, 3042, 3517, 4507, and 7500 continuously generate PPE. The waste is comprised of Tyvek coveralls, gloves, booties, Herculite, and other materials used to prevent worker exposure or the spread of contamination during routine maintenance and monitoring activities. This report describes the effort to collect and quantify removable activity that may be used by the ORNL S&M Project team to develop radiation instrumentation screening criteria. Material potentially containing removable activity was collected on smears, including both masselin large-area wipes (LAWs) and standard paper smears, and analyzed for site-related constituents (SRCs) in an analytical laboratory. The screening criteria, if approved, may be used to expedite waste disposition of relatively clean PPE. The ultimate objectives of this effort were to: 1) determine whether screening criteria can be developed for these facilities, and 2) provide process knowledge information for future site planners. The screening criteria, if calculated, must be formally approved by Federal Facility Agreement parties prior to use for ORNL S&M Project PPE disposal at the Environmental Management Waste Management Facility (EMWMF). ORAU executed the approved sampling and analysis plan (SAP) (DOE 2013) while closely coordinating with ORNL S&M Project personnel and using guidelines outlined in the Waste Handling Plan for Surveillance and Maintenance Activities at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, DOE/OR/01-2565&D2 (WHP) (DOE 2012). WHP guidelines were followed because the PPE waste targeted by this SAP is consistent with that addressed under the approved Waste Lot (WL) 108.1 profile for disposal at EMWMFthis PPE is a future waste stream as defined in the WHP. The SAP presents sampling strategy and methodology, sample selection guidelines, and analytical guidelines and requirements necessary for characterizing future ORNL S&M Project PPE waste. This report presents a review of the sample and analysis methods including data quality objectives (DQOs), required deviations from the original design, summary of field activities, radiation measurement data, analytical laboratory results, a brief presentation of results, and process knowledge summaries.

  9. Results of the measurement survey of elevation and environmental media in surface impoundments 3513 (B) and 3524 (A) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Murray, M.E.; Rose, D.A.; Brown, K.S.; Coe, R.H.C. III; Lawrence, J.D.; Winton, W.

    1998-07-01

    A measurement survey of the elevation and environmental media in impoundments 3513 (B) and 3524 (A) at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) was conducted during April 1998. The investigation was performed by the Measurement Applications and Development Group of the Life Sciences Division of ORNL at the request of Bechtel Jacobs Company. Measurement activities were conducted at selected locations in order to determine the depth and appearance of the sediment and describe the clay underlying the impoundments prior to remediation. The survey was a follow-up to a previous elevation survey. The survey included the following: collection of sediment/clay cores from selected locations in each impoundment; measurement and documentation of the elevation at the water surface, at the top of sediment, at the top of clay, and at the bottom of each core; visual inspection of each core by a soil scientist to confirm the presence of clay and not material such as fly ash and soda lime compacted over the last 50 years; measurement and documentation of the background beta-gamma radiation level at the time and location of collection of each core, the highest beta-gamma level along the sediment portion of each core, and the highest beta-gamma level along the clay portion of each core; measurement and documentation of the length of the clay and of the sediment portion of each core; photographic documentation of each core; and replacement of each core in the impoundment.

  10. K-1435 Wastewater Treatment System for the Toxic Substances Control Act Incinerator Wastewater at the East Tennessee Technology Park, Oak Ridge, TN

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Beck, Ch.A.; Tiepel, E.W.; Swientoniewski, M.D.; Crow, K.R.

    2008-07-01

    This paper will discuss the design and performance of a wastewater treatment system installed to support the operation of a hazardous waste incinerator. The Oak Ridge Toxic Substances Control Act Incinerator (TSCAI), located at the East Tennessee Technology Park (ETTP), is designed and permitted to treat Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) wastes including characteristic and listed wastes and polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)-contaminated mixed waste. The incinerator process generates acidic gases and particulates which consist of salts, metals, and radionuclides. These off-gases from the incinerator are treated with a wet off-gas scrubber system. The recirculated water is continuously purged (blow down), resulting in a wastewater to be treated. Additional water sources are also collected on the site for treatment, including storm water that infiltrates into diked areas and fire water from the incinerator's suppression system. To meet regulatory requirements for discharge, a wastewater treatment system (WWTS) was designed, constructed, and operated to treat these water sources. The WWTS was designed to provide for periodic fluctuation of contaminant concentrations due to various feed streams to the incinerator. Blow down consists of total suspended solids (TSS) and total dissolved solids (TDS), encompassing metals, radionuclide contamination and trace organics. The system design flow rate range is 7.95 to 17 cubic meters per hour (m3/hr) (35 to 75 gallons per minute; gpm). The system is designed with redundancy to minimize time off-line and to reduce impacts to the TSCAI operations. A novel treatment system uses several unit operations, including chemical feed systems, two-stage chemical reaction treatment, micro-filtration, sludge storage and dewatering, neutralization, granular activated carbon, effluent neutralization, and a complete programmable logic controller (PLC) and human-machine interface (HMI) control system. To meet the space requirements and to provide portability of the WWTS to other applications, the system was installed in three, over-the-road semi trailers, and interconnected with piping and power. Trailers were oriented on a small site footprint to facilitate ease of installation. A remote sump pump skid was provided to convey water from two holding sumps adjacent to the treatment process. An accumulation tank and pump were also provided to receive miscellaneous wastewaters for treatment if they meet the waste acceptance criteria. The paper will include details of the technology used in the design, the requirements for compliance, and the initial performance demonstration and jar testing results. The WWTS successfully allowed for highly efficient, high-volume treatment with compliant discharge to off-site surface water. (authors)

  11. K-1435 Wastewater Treatment System for the Toxic Substances Control Act Incinerator Wastewater at the East Tennessee Technology Park, Oak Ridge, TN

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Swientoniewski M.D.

    2008-02-24

    This paper discusses the design and performance of a wastewater treatment system installed to support the operation of a hazardous waste incinerator. The Oak Ridge Toxic Substances Control Act Incinerator (TSCAI), located at the East Tennessee Technology Park (ETTP), is designed and permitted to treat Resource ConservatioN and Recovery Act (RCRA) wastes including characteristic and listed wastes and polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)-contaminated mixed waste. the incinerator process generates acidic gases and particulates which consist of salts, metals, and radionuclides. These off-gases from the incinerator are treated with a wet off-gas scrubber system. The recirculated water is continuously purged (below down), resulting in a wastewater to be treated. Additional water sources are also collected on the site for treatment, including storm water that infiltrates into diked areas and fire water from the incinerator's suppression system. To meet regulatory requirements for discharge, a wastewater treatment system (WWTS) was designed, constructed, and operated to treat these water sources. The WWTS was designed to provide for periodic fluctuation of contaminant concentrations due to various feed streams to the incinverator. Blow down consists of total suspended solids (TSS) and total dissolved solids (TDS), encompassing metals, radionuclide contamination and trace organics. The system design flow rate range is 35 to 75 gallons per minute (gpm). The system is designed with redundancy to minimize time off-line and to reduce impacts to the TSCAI operations. A novel treatment system uses several unit operations, including chemical feed systems, two-stage chemical reaction treatment, microfiltration, sludge storage and dewatering, neutralization, granular activated carbon, effluent neutralization, and a complete programmable logic controller (PLC) and human-machine interface (HMI) control system. To meet the space requirements and to provide portability of the WWTS to other applications, the system was installed in three, over-the-road semi trailers, and interconnected with piping and power. Trailers were oriented on a small site footprint to facilitate ease of installation. A remote sump pump skid was provided to convey water from two holding sumps adjacent to the treatment process. An accumulation tank and pump were also provided to receive miscellaneous wastewaters for treatment if they meet the waste acceptance criteria. The paper includes details of the technology used in the design, the requirements for compliance, and the initial performance demonstration and jar testing results. The WWTS successfully allowed for highly efficient, high-volume treatment with compliant discharge to off-site surface water.

  12. EA-1642-S1: Small-Scale Pilot Plant for the Gasification of Coal and Coal-Biomass Blends and Conversion of Derived Syngas to Liquid Fuels via Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis, Lexington, KY

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This draft Supplemental Environmental Assessment (SEA) analyzes the potential environmental impacts of DOE’s proposed action of providing cost-shared funding for the University of Kentucky (UK) Center for Applied Energy Research (CAER) Small-Scale Pilot Plant for the Gasification of Coal and Coal-Biomass Blends and Conversion of Derived Syngas to Liquid Fuels via Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis project and of the No-Action Alternative.

  13. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Nuclear Development Corp of America -

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    NY 32 Development Corp of America - NY 32 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: NUCLEAR DEVELOPMENT CORP. OF AMERICA (NY.32) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 5 New Street , White Plains , New York NY.32-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.32-2 Site Operations: Conducted experiments involving uranium recovery from scrap. NY.32-2 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No Authority - Facility was licensed to handle nuclear materials NY.32-2

  14. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- The Carborundum Co Inc Buffalo Ave

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Plant - NY 31 Buffalo Ave Plant - NY 31 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: THE CARBORUNDUM CO., INC., BUFFALO AVE. PLANT (NY.31) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Carborundum Company NY.31-1 Location: Buffalo Avenue , Niagra Falls , New York NY.31-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.31-1 Site Operations: Produced Zirconium and Hafnium; fabricated nuclear reactor fuel elements and conducted research and development with Plutonium. NY.31-1 Site

  15. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- University of Rochester Medical Lab -

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    NY 20 Rochester Medical Lab - NY 20 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL LAB. (NY.20) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Rochester , New York NY.20-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.20-1 Site Operations: Research activities involving small quantities of radioactive materials in a controlled environment. NY.20-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination remote NY.20-2 Radioactive

  16. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- American Machine and Foundry Co -

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Buffalo - NY 63 Buffalo - NY 63 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: American Machine and Foundry Co - Buffalo (NY.63 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: AMF NY.63-1 Location: Buffalo , New York NY.63-1 Evaluation Year: 1990 NY.63-1 Site Operations: Design engineering for the development of electrical and mechanical controls. NY.63-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for radioactive contamination considered remote. Radioactive

  17. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Belmont Smelting and Refining Works

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Inc - NY 44 Belmont Smelting and Refining Works Inc - NY 44 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Belmont Smelting & Refining Works Inc (NY 0-04) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Brooklyn , New York NY.44-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.44-1 Site Operations: Supplied the MED with construction materials. NY.44-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No indication of radioactive materials handled at this site NY.44-1 Radioactive

  18. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Cornell University Medical College -

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    NY 28 Cornell University Medical College - NY 28 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: CORNELL UNIVERSITY MEDICAL COLLEGE (NY.28 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Cornell University and Medical College NY.28-1 Location: New York , New York NY.28-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.28-1 Site Operations: Research activities involving small quantities of radioactive materials in a controlled environment. NY.28-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated -

  19. Williamstown Utility Comm | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Comm Place: Kentucky Phone Number: (859) 824-3633 Website: www.wtownky.orgDepartmentsEl Twitter: @WilliamstownKY Facebook: https:www.facebook.comWilliamstownKY Outage...

  20. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Domes c crude oil fi rst purchase prices dollars per barrel Year month U.S. Average PAD District 1 PAD District 2 U.S. Average Less AK North Slope Average NY PA WV Average IL IN KS KY MI NE 1990 20.03 21.57 22.06 23.32 23.00 22.16 22.88 23.36 23.46 23.21 23.20 22.92 21.94 1991 16.54 18.16 19.01 19.67 19.48 W 19.58 20.19 20.20 19.84 19.84 19.88 18.78 1992 15.99 17.38 18.52 19.05 19.01 18.09 18.63 19.26 19.27 18.50 18.75 18.99 17.51 1993 14.25 15.31 17.28 17.20 17.53 16.76 16.27 16.97 16.97 15.95

  1. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Sylvania Corning Nuclear Corp Inc

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Sylvania Laboratories - NY 07 Nuclear Corp Inc Sylvania Laboratories - NY 07 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: SYLVANIA CORNING NUCLEAR CORP., INC., SYLVANIA LABORATORIES (NY.07) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Sylvania Electric Products, Inc. NY.07-1 Location: 208-220 Willets Point Boulevard , Bayside, Long Island , New York NY.07-1 NY.07-2 NY.07-3 Evaluation Year: 1985 NY.07-4 NY.07-5 Site Operations: Conducted research and development

  2. Including environmental concerns in management strategies for depleted uranium hexafluoride

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Goldberg, M.; Avci, H.I.; Bradley, C.E.

    1995-12-31

    One of the major programs within the Office of Nuclear Energy, Science, and Technology of the US Department of Energy (DOE) is the depleted uranium hexafluoride (DUF{sub 6}) management program. The program is intended to find a long-term management strategy for the DUF{sub 6} that is currently stored in approximately 46,400 cylinders at Paducah, KY; Portsmouth, OH; and Oak Ridge, TN, USA. The program has four major components: technology assessment, engineering analysis, cost analysis, and the environmental impact statement (EIS). From the beginning of the program, the DOE has incorporated the environmental considerations into the process of strategy selection. Currently, the DOE has no preferred alternative. The results of the environmental impacts assessment from the EIS, as well as the results from the other components of the program, will be factored into the strategy selection process. In addition to the DOE`s current management plan, other alternatives continued storage, reuse, or disposal of depleted uranium, will be considered in the EIS. The EIS is expected to be completed and issued in its final form in the fall of 1997.

  3. AVTA Federal Fleet PEV Readiness Data Logging and Characterization Study for Department of Veterans Affairs. James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Schey, Stephen; Francfort, Jim

    2014-10-01

    This report focuses on the Department of Veterans Affairs, James J. Peters VA Medical Center (VA - Bronx) fleet to identify daily operational characteristics of select vehicles and report findings on vehicle and mission characterizations to support the successful introduction of PEVs into the agencies fleets. Individual observations of these selected vehicles provide the basis for recommendations related to electric vehicle adoption and whether a battery electric vehicle or plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (collectively referred to as PEVs) can fulfill the mission requirements.

  4. Superfund Record of Decision (EPA Region 2): Love Canal (93rd Street School), Niagara County, City of Niagara Falls, NY. (Third remedial action), (amendment), May 1991. Final report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1991-05-15

    The Love Canal (93rd Street) site is an inactive hazardous waste site located in Niagara Falls, New York. The 19-acre 93rd Street School site, one of several operable units for the Love Canal Superfund site, is the focus of the Record of Decision (ROD). The fill material is reported to contain fly ash and BHC (a pesticide) waste. The ROD amends the 1988 ROD, and addresses final remediation of onsite contaminated soil through excavation and offsite disposal. The primary contaminants of concern affecting the soil are VOCs including toluene and xylenes; other organics including PAHs and pesticides; and metals including arsenic, chromium, and lead.

  5. Superfund Record of Decision (EPA Region 2): Hooker Chemical S-Area, Niagara Falls, NY. (First remedial action), September 1990. Final report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1990-09-21

    The Hooker Chemical S-Area site is a former landfill area located in Niagara Falls, New York. The site lies adjacent to the Niagara River. Approximately 63,000 tons of chemical processing wastes were disposed of at the landfill. Ground water beneath the site also has been contaminated from aqueous phase and non-aqueous phase liquid chemicals. Chemicals have migrated toward the Niagara Falls Drinking Water Treatment Plant (DWTP) which lies to the east of the site, contaminating the Bedrock intake structures. The Record of Decision (ROD) addresses the landfill, a contaminated ground water plume, bedrock contamination, and the DWTP. The primary contaminants of concern affecting the soil, sediment, and ground water are VOCs including PCE; and other organics including chlorinated organics and pesticides. The selected remedial action for the site is included.

  6. Superfund explanation of significant difference for the record of decision (EPA region 2): Love Canal, Niagara Falls, NY, September 5, 1996

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1997-11-01

    The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) announce this Explanation of Significant Differences (ESD) to explain modifications to the selected remedy for the final destruction and disposal of Love Canal dioxin-contaminated sewer and creek sediments. These modifications are embodied in proposed changes to a partial consent decree between the United States and the State of New York and the Occidental Chemical Corporation (OCC) in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York.

  7. Superfund Record of Decision (EPA Region 2): Hooker-102nd Street Landfill, Niagara Falls, NY. (First remedial action), September 1990. Final report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1990-09-26

    The 22-acre Hooker-102nd Street site is a former industrial landfill in the city of Niagara Falls, Niagara County, New York. The site is adjacent to, and partially within the Niagara River's 100-year floodplain. These studies and the Remedial Investigation (RI) initiated in 1984, identified contamination in ground water, onsite and offsite soil, rivershore sediment, and within a storm sewer. Additionally, the presence of a leachate plume of non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPLs) was discovered emanating from the landfill area. The Record of Decision (ROD) is the final remedy which addresses all of the contaminated media. The primary contaminants of concern affecting the soil, sediment, and ground water are VOCs including benzene, TCE, and toluene; other organics including PCBs and phenols; and metals including arsenic.

  8. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2001 NATIONAL OILHEAT RESEARCH ALLIANCE TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE HELD AT BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY, UPTON, N.Y., APRIL 30 - MAY 1, 2001.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    MCDONALD, R.J.

    2001-04-30

    BNL is proud to acknowledge all of our 2001 sponsors, with their help and support this has correctly become an oilheat industry conference. It is quite gratifying to see an industry come together to help support an activity like the technology conference, for the benefit of the industry as a whole and to celebrate the beginning of the National Oilheat Research Alliance. This meeting is the fourteenth oil heat industry technology conference to be held since 1984 and the first under a new name, NORA, the National Oilheat research Alliance, and the very first in the new century. The conference is a very important part of the effort in technology transfer, which is supported by the Oilheat Research Program. The Oilheat Research Program at BNL is under the newly assigned program management at the Office of Power Technology within the US DOE. The foremost reason for the conference is to provide a platform for the exchange of information and perspectives among international researchers, engineers, manufacturers, service technicians, and marketers of oil-fired space-conditioning equipment. The conference provides a conduit by which information and ideas can be exchanged to examine present technologies, as well as helping to develop the future course for oil heating advancement. These conferences also serve as a stage for unifying government representatives, researchers, fuel oil marketers, and other members of the oil-heat industry in addressing technology advancements in this important energy use sector. The specific objectives of the conference are to: (1) Identify and evaluate the current state-of-the-art and recommend new initiatives for higher efficiency, a cleaner environment, and to satisfy consumer needs cost-effectively, reliably, and safely; (2) Foster cooperative interactions among federal and industrial representatives for the common goal of sustained economic growth and energy security via energy conservation. Seventeen technical presentations will be made during the two-day program, all related to oil-heat technology and equipment, these will cover a range of research, developmental, and demonstration activities being conducted within the United States and Europe, including: (1) High-flow Fan Atomization Burner (HFAB) Development and Field Trials; (2) Field Test of the Flame Quality Monitor; (3) NORA/DOE/ BNL Oilheat Five-Year Research Plan; (4) US Department of Energy's Building Cooling Heating and Power for Buildings Program; (5) NORA Education Committee Report; (6) Marketing Oil Heat in Europe: A study in contrasts; (7) Diagnosing Burner Problems with Recorded Data ''The solution to any problem is obvious.. . once it is found''; (8) Variable Firing Rate Oil Burner Using Pulse Fuel Flow Control; (9) Oil-Fired Hydronic Heating Appliances with Reduced Electric Power Consumption and Battery Backup; (10) Peep Into The Nozzle Using Computational Fluid Dynamics; (11) Results of a Parametric Investigation of Spray Characteristics Using a HFAB Type Atomizer; (12) Progression and Improvements in the Design of Blue-flame Oil Burners; (13) Biodiesel as a Heating Oil Blend Stock; (14) Lab Tests of Biodiesel Blends in Residential Heating Equipment; (15) Alternative Fuel Oils and the Effect of Selected Properties in Combustion; (16) New York State Premium Low-Sulfur Heating Fuel Marketplace Demonstration; and (17)The Need for a New Fuel Oil Stability Specification.

  9. DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: Greenhill Contracting...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    New Paltz, NY DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: Greenhill Contracting, New Paltz, NY DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: Greenhill Contracting, New Paltz, NY Case study of ...

  10. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Rockefeller Institute for Medical

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Research - NY 0-21 Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research - NY 0-21 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: ROCKEFELLER INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH (NY.0-21) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: New York , New York NY.0-21-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.0-21-1 Site Operations: Research and development involving only small amounts of radioactive material in a controlled environment. NY.0-21-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated -

  11. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Titanium Alloys Manufacturing Co Div

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    of National Lead of Ohio - NY 41 Alloys Manufacturing Co Div of National Lead of Ohio - NY 41 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: TITANIUM ALLOYS MANUFACTURING CO., DIV. OF NATIONAL LEAD OF OHIO (NY.41) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Titanium Alloy Metals Titanium Alloy Manufacturing Division Titanium Alloy Manufacturing (TAM) Division of National Lead Company The Titanium Pigment Co. NL Industries ICD/Niagara NY.41-1 NY.41-2 NY.41-3

  12. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Research - NY 0-05 Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research - NY 0-05 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research (NY.0-05) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Yonkers , New York NY.0-05-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.0-05-1 Site Operations: Site activities limited to research operations involving small quantities of radioactive materials. NY.0-05-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for

  13. Substrate interactions with suspended and supported monolayer...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Mikhail 3 + Show Author Affiliations Columbia Univ., New York, NY (United States) Brookhaven National Lab. (BNL), Upton, NY (United States) Elettra Sincrotrone Trieste,...

  14. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Carnegie Institute of Washington...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Carnegie Institute of Washington Dept of Genetics - NY 0-07 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Carnegie Institute of Washington (Dept. of Genetics) (NY.0-07 ) Eliminated from...

  15. DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: Ferguson Design and Constructio...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Ferguson Design and Construction Inc., Sagaponack, NY, Custom Home DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: Ferguson Design and Construction Inc., Sagaponack, NY, Custom Home Case ...

  16. DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: Ithaca Neighborhood Housing...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Ithaca Neighborhood Housing Services, Ithaca, NY DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: Ithaca Neighborhood Housing Services, Ithaca, NY Case study of a DOE Zero Energy Ready Home ...

  17. DOE/EIA-M071(2009) International Energy Module

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Economics (McGraw-Hill Book Company, NY: NY, 1967). Wayne L. Winston, Operations Research: Applications and Algorithms (BrooksCole- Thomson Learning, Belmont, CA, 2004)....

  18. Workplace Charging Challenge Partner: Purchase College, State...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Other initiatives include real-time bus schedules, zipcars, 511 NY Rideshare for ... Other initiatives include real-time bus schedules, zipcars, 511NY Rideshare for commuters, ...

  19. Tax Credits, Rebates & Savings | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    NY-Sun Commerical Industrial Incentive Program New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) through NY-Sun CommercialIndustrial Incentive Program (PON 3082)...

  20. Tax Credits, Rebates & Savings | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    NY-Sun PV Incentive Program (Residential and Small Business) The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) through NY Sun Incentive Program (PON...

  1. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Sylvania Corning Nuclear...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Nuclear Corp Inc Sylvania Laboratories - NY 07 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: SYLVANIA CORNING NUCLEAR CORP., INC., SYLVANIA LABORATORIES (NY.07) Eliminated from consideration under ...

  2. Tax Credits, Rebates & Savings | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Rebates & Savings NY-Sun PV Incentive Program (Residential and Small Business) The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) through NY Sun Incentive...

  3. Tax Credits, Rebates & Savings | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    NY-Sun PV Incentive Program (Residential and Small Business) The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) through NY Sun Incentive Program (PON 2112)...

  4. Renewable Energy Network of Entrepreneurs in Western New York...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    York RENEW NY Jump to: navigation, search Name: Renewable Energy Network of Entrepreneurs in Western New York (RENEW NY) Place: Rochester, New York Zip: 14623 Sector: Renewable...

  5. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Brookhaven National Laboratory...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Brookhaven National Laboratory Buildings 353 354 467 and 468 - NY 14 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Brookhaven National Laboratory Buildings 353 354 467 and 468 (NY.14 ) Designated...

  6. SGDP Report: Interoperability of Demand Response Resources Demonstrati...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    SGDP Report: Interoperability of Demand Response Resources Demonstration in NY (February 2015) SGDP Report: Interoperability of Demand Response Resources Demonstration in NY ...

  7. New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Albany...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Albany, NY New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Albany, NY This presentation on the NYSERDA Hydrogen...

  8. Structural and mechanistic insights into Mcm2-7 double-hexamer...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States); Stony Brook Univ., Stony Brook, NY (United States) Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, London (United Kingdom). DNA ...

  9. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- International Rare Metals Refinery Inc

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    - NY 38 Rare Metals Refinery Inc - NY 38 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: International Rare Metals Refinery, Inc. (NY.38 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Canadian Radium and Uranium Corporation NY.38-1 Location: 69 Kisko Avenue , Mt. Kisko , New York NY.38-1 NY.38-3 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.38-4 Site Operations: Manufactured and distributed radium and polonium products. NY.38-5 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No Authority - Site was a

  10. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- American Machine and Foundry Co - Bus

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Terminal - NY 59 Bus Terminal - NY 59 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: American Machine and Foundry Co - Bus Terminal (NY.59) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: AMF, Bus Terminal Office NY.59-1 NY.59-3 Location: New York , New York NY.59-1 Evaluation Year: 1990 NY.59-1 Site Operations: Design, procure, and ship material supporting development of means for handling extruded uranium metal rod. NY.59-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated -

  11. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Curtiss-Wright Corp Metals Processing

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Div - NY 40 Curtiss-Wright Corp Metals Processing Div - NY 40 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Curtiss-Wright Corp., Metals Processing Div. (NY.40 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP - Referred to DOD Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Curtiss-Wright Corporation NY.40-1 Location: Buffalo , New York NY.40-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.40-2 Site Operations: Performed casting, forging, and extrusion operations for the U.S. Air Force and the AEC. NY.40-1 NY.40-2 Site

  12. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Crucible Steel Co of America...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Crucible Steel Co of America - NY 34 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Crucible Steel Co. of America (NY.34 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated...

  13. Current Partners > Partnerships > The Energy Materials Center...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    below. More information about each of these, and other partners coming soon. General Motors Honeoye Falls, NY Primet Precision Materials Ithaca, NY Ford Motor Corporation...

  14. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Naval Supply Depot AEC Warehouse...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Supply Depot AEC Warehouse - NY 36 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: NAVAL SUPPLY DEPOT, AEC WAREHOUSE (NY.36) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP - Referred to DOD...

  15. EA-1720: Final Environmental Assessment

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pyrotek, Inc. Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Project, Sanborn, NY

  16. Lessons-Learned from D and D Activities at the Five Gaseous Diffusion Buildings (K-25, K- 27, K-29, K-31 and K-33) East Tennessee Technology Park, Oak Ridge, TN - 13574

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kopotic, James D.; Ferri, Mark S.; Buttram, Claude

    2013-07-01

    The East Tennessee Technology Park (ETTP) is the site of five former gaseous diffusion plant (GDP) process buildings that were used to enrich uranium from 1945 to 1985. The process equipment in the original two buildings (K-25 and K-27) was used for the production of highly enriched uranium (HEU), while that in the three later buildings (K-29, K-31 and K-33) produced low enriched uranium (LEU). Equipment was contaminated primarily with uranium and to a lesser extent technetium (Tc). Decommissioning of the GDP process buildings has presented several unique challenges and produced many lessons-learned. Among these is the importance of good, up-front characterization in developing the best demolition approach. Also, chemical cleaning of process gas equipment and piping (PGE) prior to shutdown should be considered to minimize the amount of hold-up material that must be removed by demolition crews. Another lesson learned is to maintain shutdown buildings in a dry state to minimize structural degradation which can significantly complicate characterization, deactivation and demolition efforts. Perhaps the most important lesson learned is that decommissioning GDP process buildings is first and foremost a waste logistics challenge. Innovative solutions are required to effectively manage the sheer volume of waste generated from decontamination and demolition (D and D) of these enormous facilities. Finally, close coordination with Security is mandatory to effectively manage Special Nuclear Material (SNM) and classified equipment issues. (authors)

  17. Site Safety and Health Plan (Phase 3) for the treatability study for in situ vitrification at Seepage Pit 1 in Waste Area Grouping 7, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Spalding, B.P.; Naney, M.T.

    1995-06-01

    This plan is to be implemented for Phase III ISV operations and post operations sampling. Two previous project phases involving site characterization have been completed and required their own site specific health and safety plans. Project activities will take place at Seepage Pit 1 in Waste Area Grouping 7 at ORNL, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Purpose of this document is to establish standard health and safety procedures for ORNL project personnel and contractor employees in performance of this work. Site activities shall be performed in accordance with Energy Systems safety and health policies and procedures, DOE orders, Occupational Safety and Health Administration Standards 29 CFR Part 1910 and 1926; applicable United States Environmental Protection Agency requirements; and consensus standards. Where the word ``shall`` is used, the provisions of this plan are mandatory. Specific requirements of regulations and orders have been incorporated into this plan in accordance with applicability. Included from 29 CFR are 1910.120 Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response; 1910.146, Permit Required - Confined Space; 1910.1200, Hazard Communication; DOE Orders requirements of 5480.4, Environmental Protection, Safety and Health Protection Standards; 5480.11, Radiation Protection; and N5480.6, Radiological Control Manual. In addition, guidance and policy will be followed as described in the Environmental Restoration Program Health and Safety Plan. The levels of personal protection and the procedures specified in this plan are based on the best information available from reference documents and site characterization data. Therefore, these recommendations represent the minimum health and safety requirements to be observed by all personnel engaged in this project.

  18. Karren L. More, Ph.D. Leader, Microscopy Group Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1 Bethel Valley Rd. Building 4515, MS 6064 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6064 (865) 574-7788 morekl1@ornl.gov

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Hitachi HF-3300 TEM-STEM Current Research Activities: * Catalyst nanoparticle imaging and analysis * Carbon nanotube/nanohorn characterization * Li-ion battery research and in-situ testing * Fuel cell materials research * Thermoelectric materials research Techniques/Capabilities: * 100kV and 300kV operation * Cold FEG * Bruker SDD-EDS and Spectrum Imaging * Gatan Quantum 953 EELS/GIF * Dual Bi-prism Assembly for Electron Holography * SEM, BF-STEM, and HAADF-STEM Detectors * High-Resolution TEM

  19. Karren L. More, Ph.D. Leader, Microscopy Group Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1 Bethel Valley Rd. Building 4515, MS 6064 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6064 (865) 574-7788 morekl1@ornl.gov

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Cameca Instruments Local Electrode Atom Probe (LEAP ® 4000X HR) Current Research Activities: Atomic level 3D microstructural characterization of solute distributions in a wide range of materials Techniques/Capabilities: * Atom Probe Tomography * Laser and voltage pulsing * 200 kHz high voltage pulse generator , 1 MHz laser * Reflectron energy- compensating lens * Crossed delay line, single atom position-sensitive detector * Comprehensive suite for data analysis including IVAS, PoSAP and

  20. Karren L. More, Ph.D. Leader, Microscopy Group Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1 Bethel Valley Rd. Building 4515, MS 6064 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6064 (865) 574-7788 morekl1@ornl.gov

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Nion UltraSTEM TM 100 Dedicated Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope Instrument Applications: Atomic resolution imaging and spectroscopy at mid- and low-voltage with single atom sensitivity Instrument Specifications: * Cold field emission gun * 3 rd generation C 3 /C 5 aberration corrector * 60-100kV operation * <1Å spatial resolution at 100 kV * <1.1Å spatial resolution at 60 kV * >0.5nA of current with atom-sized probe * <350meV energy resolution at 100 kV * Gatan Enfina

  1. Karren L. More, Ph.D. Leader, Microscopy Group Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1 Bethel Valley Rd. Building 4515, MS 6064 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6064 (865) 574-7788 morekl1@ornl.gov

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Titan S Aberration-corrected TEM-STEM Techniques/Capabilities: * extreme Schottky-field emission gun (X-FEG) * CEOS dodecapole probe (STEM) aberration corrector * GIF Quantum with dual EELS and fast spectrum imaging capabilities * Operating voltages: 60kV, 120kV, and 300kV * HAADF/ADF/BF STEM detectors * advanced version 2k X 2k UltraScan CCD * CompuStage SuperTwin lens (±30° tilt) Contact: Miaofang Chi, chim@ornl.gov, (865) 241-4284 Ge (112) Current available dedicated holders: * FEI

  2. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Commercial (Burial) Disposal Site

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Maxey Flats Disposal Site - KY 02 Commercial (Burial) Disposal Site Maxey Flats Disposal Site - KY 02 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Commercial (Burial) Disposal Site, Maxey Flats Disposal Site (KY.02) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see Maxey Flats, Kentucky, Site Documents Related to Commercial (Burial) Disposal Site,

  3. NUG 2000

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Valley Road Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Presentations Agenda NUG Meeting: June 5-6, 2000 Garden Plaza Hotel, Oak Ridge, TN The next NERSC User Group meeting will be held in Oak Ridge, TN,...

  4. WTP Contract Section J Atch J Sub-Atch A (A152).xls

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ... Carbon Bed Adsorbers TN-24590-06-02456 Instrument Tubing Clamps TN-24590-06-02460 ... Order of Distribution Panelboards and Transformers TN-24590-06-02565 Startup LAW ...

  5. Paducah Site Hosts Governor’s Scholars Visit

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    PADUCAH, Ky. – Nineteen of Kentucky’s brightest teenagers visited the Paducah site this summer to learn more about environmental cleanup and waste management.

  6. Hickman, Kentucky: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Kentucky: Energy Resources (Redirected from Hickman, KY) Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 36.5711721, -89.1861791 Show Map Loading map......

  7. Tax Credits, Rebates & Savings | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Mountain Association for Community Economic Development- HowmartKY On-Bill Financing Energy Efficiency Program Four rural utility cooperatives in Eastern Kentucky (Big Sandy RECC,...

  8. Cleanup Contractor at Paducah Site Receives Performance Excellence Award

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    PADUCAH, Ky. – The environmental cleanup contractor at EM’s Paducah site has been honored for demonstrating serious commitment to performance improvement principles.

  9. bectso-10mw | netl.doe.gov

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Airpol, Inc., West Paducah, KY PROGRAM PUBLICATIONS Final Reports Clean Coal Technology III: 10-MW Demonstration of Gas Suspension Absorption, Final Project Performance and ...

  10. Cleanup Contractor Achieves ‘Elite’ Nuclear Material Accountability Status

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    PADUCAH, Ky. – EM’s cleanup contractor at the Paducah site has received national acclaim for timeliness of reporting and promptness in reconciling nuclear material inventories.

  11. NETL F 451.1/1-1, Categorical Exclusion Designation Form

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    DE; National Carbon Capture Center - Wilsonville, AL; Parsons Corporation - Philadelphia, PA, Boston, MA, Pasadena, CA, Richmond, KY, and Washington, DC FESCCCapture...

  12. SREL Reprint #3215

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    L. Jones3, Cris Hagen2, and Stacey L. Lance2 1Department of Biological Sciences, Moore 235, Eastern Kentucky University, 521 Lancaster Avenue, Richmond, KY 40475, USA...

  13. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Paducah, KY (United States) Pantex Plant (PTX), Amarillo, TX (United States) Pertoleum Oil Reserves Office Philadelphia Regional Office, Philadelphia, PA (United States)...

  14. Cayman Islands: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Country Profile Name Cayman Islands Population Unavailable GDP Unavailable Energy Consumption Quadrillion Btu 2-letter ISO code KY 3-letter ISO code CYM Numeric ISO code...

  15. DOE, Contractors Gather Food for Less Fortunate | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    DOE, Contractors Gather Food for Less Fortunate DOE, Contractors Gather Food for Less Fortunate July 1, 2014 - 10:27am Addthis Mark Duff (LATA KY), Christa Dailey (Pro2Serve), Jennifer Woodard (DOE) and Kelly Layne (LATA KY) with an American flag constructed of donated food. Mark Duff (LATA KY), Christa Dailey (Pro2Serve), Jennifer Woodard (DOE) and Kelly Layne (LATA KY) with an American flag constructed of donated food. Media Contact Buz Smith (270) 441-6821 Robert.Smith@lex.doe.gov PADUCAH,

  16. BioenergizeME Virtual Science Fair: Coal Can Be Green Too

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This infographic was created by students from Belfry School in Belfry, KY, as part of the U.S. Department of Energy-BioenergizeME Virtual Science Fair.

  17. Innovative Approach Reduces Costs of Removing Contaminated Oil from Paducah Site

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    PADUCAH, Ky. – For more than 60 years, 60 electrical distribution transformers supplied some of the power to enrich uranium at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PGDP).

  18. Paducah Community Chronicles Site History in New Book

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    PADUCAH, Ky. – Members of the Paducah Citizens Advisory Board (CAB) spearheaded the publication of a new book that captures the history of EM’s Paducah site.

  19. Paducah Package Steam Boilers to Provide Efficiency, Environmental Benefits

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    PADUCAH, Ky. – Five modern, modular steam boilers have replaced three larger coal-fired boilers that comprised the steam plant at EM’s Paducah Site.

  20. Regional News Coverage 2015 | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC...

    Office of Science (SC) Website

    National Science Bowl U.S. Department of Energy SC-27 Forrestal Building 1000 ... and Science in Kentucky, Bowling Green, KY .pdf file (18KB) The Westminster ...

  1. Synoptic Overview of RACORO

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Synoptic Overview of RACORO Daniel Hartsock and Pete Lamb - OU CIMMS Jason Tomlinson - PNNL 2009 ARM Science Team Meeting March 31 st , 2009 Louisville, KY Synoptic Overview * What...

  2. SREL Reprint #3291

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    de Mxico, Mexico 2Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, Aiken, SC, USA 3Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA 4Department of...

  3. Students Imagine Paducah Site as Technical, Industrial Hub

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    PADUCAH, Ky. – University of Kentucky (UK) College of Design students envision the Paducah site as a thriving, multiple-use area in the future.

  4. Northern Kentucky Veterans Job Fair | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Northern Kentucky Veterans Job Fair Northern Kentucky Veterans Job Fair March 23, 2016 8:00AM to 4:40PM EDT Receptions, Erlanger, KY

  5. Workers Demolish Metals Plant at Paducah Site

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    PADUCAH, Ky. – EM cleanup efforts at the Paducah site progressed this month with the demolition of one of the site’s most contaminated structures.

  6. New York State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement | Department of

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Energy York State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement New York State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, the NY State Homes and Community Renewal, the NY State Energy Research and Development Authority, the NY Power Authority, and the NY State Office and State Historic Preservation Office regarding EECBG, SEP and WAP undertakings. PDF icon state_historic_preservation_programmatic_agreement_ny.pdf More Documents &

  7. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Clarksville Foundry and Machine Co -

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    TN 08 Clarksville Foundry and Machine Co - TN 08 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Clarksville Foundry and Machine Co. (TN.08 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Clarksville , Tennessee TN.08-1 Evaluation Year: Circa 1994 TN.08-1 Site Operations: Produced stainless steel doorstops (probably a code word) for Savannah River Operations. TN.08-2 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Limited scope of activities performed - No

  8. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Diffusion Plant (K-25), Oak Ridge, TN (United States) Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), Oak Ridge, TN (United States) Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak...

  9. New Phase of Demolition Ramps Up at Paducah

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    PADUCAH, Ky. – Heavy equipment operators safely demolished the first of 12 inactive facilities set for removal in coming months as part of EM’s ongoing Paducah Site cleanup.PADUCAH, Ky. – Heavy equipment operators safely demolished the first of 12 inactive facilities set for removal in coming months as part of EM’s ongoing Paducah Site cleanup.

  10. Track 9: Quality Assurance

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    ISM Workshop Presentations Knoxville Convention Center, Knoxville, TN August 2009 Track 9: Quality Assurance

  11. Track 10: Feedback and Improvement

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    ISM Workshop Presentations Knoxville Convention Center, Knoxville, TN August 2009 Track 10: Feedback and Improvement

  12. Rooftop Unit and Autonomous Control and Communication for RTU Network- Supermarket

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Lead Performer: Oak Ridge National Laboratory - Oak Ridge, TN Project Partner: Emerson - St. Louis, MO

  13. Next Generation Household Refrigerator

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Lead Performer: Oak Ridge National Laboratory - Oak Ridge, TN Partner: Whirlpool - Benton Harbor, MI

  14. Track 2: Worker Engagement

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    ISM Workshop Presentations Knoxville Convention Center, Knoxville, TN August 2009 Track 2: Worker Engagement

  15. Track 3: Exposure Hazards

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    ISM Workshop Presentations Knoxville Convention Center, Knoxville, TN August 2009 Track 3: Exposure Hazards

  16. Track 4: Employee Health and Wellness

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    ISM Workshop Presentations Knoxville Convention Center, Knoxville, TN August 2009 Track 4: Employee Health and Wellness

  17. Building America Case Study: Apartment Compartmentalization with an Aerosol-Based Sealing Process - Queens, NY (Fact Sheet), Technology Solutions for New and Existing Homes, Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Apartment Compartmentalization with an Aerosol-Based Sealing Process Queens, New York PROJECT INFORMATION Construction: New Type: Multifamily Partners: Builder: Bluestone Organization, bluestoneorg.com Consortium for Advanced Residential Buildings, carb-swa.com Research Topic: Air sealing building enclosures Date Completed: 2014 Climate Zones: All PERFORMANCE DATA The aerosol process resulted in an average reduction of 71% in air leakage and an average apartment airtightness of 0.08 CFM50/ft 2

  18. EV Community Readiness projects: New York City and Lower Hudson...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    projects: New York City and Lower Hudson Valley Clean Communities, Inc. (NY, MA, PA); NYSERDA (ME, NH, VT, MA, RI, CT, NY, NJ, PA, DE, MD, DC) EV Community Readiness...

  19. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Titanium Alloys Manufacturing...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Alloys Manufacturing Co Div of National Lead of Ohio - NY 41 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: TITANIUM ALLOYS MANUFACTURING CO., DIV. OF NATIONAL LEAD OF OHIO (NY.41) Eliminated from...

  20. DOE/EIA-M066(2007)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Economics (McGraw-Hill Book Company, NY: NY, 1967). Wayne L. Winston, Operations Research: Applications and Algorithms (BrooksCole- Thomson Learning, Belmont, CA, 2004). U.S....

  1. DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: Greenhill Contracting...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Green Acres 20, 26, 28, New Paltz, NY DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: Greenhill Contracting, Green Acres 20, 26, 28, New Paltz, NY Case study of three DOE 2015 Housing ...

  2. Global Renewable Energy Network | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Renewable Energy Network (GReEN) Name: Global Renewable Energy Network (GReEN) Address: P.O. Box 1999 Place: Massapequa, NY Zip: 11758 Region: Northeast - NY NJ CT PA Area Number...

  3. Enhancing Railroad Hazardous Materials Transportation Safety Rail Routing

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Presentation made by Kevin Blackwell for the NTSF annual meeting held from May 14-16, 2013 in Buffalo, NY

  4. Implementation of Section 180(c) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Presentation made by Corinne Macaluso for the NTSF annual meeting held from May 14-16, 2013 in Buffalo, NY.

  5. Coalition on West Valley Nuclear Wastes

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Presentation made by Joanne Hameister for the NTSF annual meeting held from May 14-16, 2013 in Buffalo, NY.

  6. SGDP Report: Interoperability of Demand Response Resources Demonstration in

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    NY (February 2015) | Department of Energy SGDP Report: Interoperability of Demand Response Resources Demonstration in NY (February 2015) SGDP Report: Interoperability of Demand Response Resources Demonstration in NY (February 2015) The Interoperability of Demand Response Resources Demonstration in NY was awarded to Con Edison in 2009 as part of DOE's Smart Grid Demonstration Project (SGDP) grants funded by the Recovery Act. The objective of the project was to develop and demonstrate

  7. Update on Tribal Issues- Mapping Tool, Policy Statement, and Protocol Manual

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Presentation made by Stuart Easson for the NTSF annual meeting held from May 14-16, 2013 in Buffalo, NY.

  8. The Proposed BNSF Settlement Agreement: Background & WIEB Comments

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Presentation made by Jim Williams for the NTSF annual meeting held from May 14-16, 2013 in Buffalo, NY.

  9. U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board: Roles and Priorities

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Presentation made by Nigel Mote for the NTSF annual meeting held from May 14-16, 2013 in Buffalo, NY

  10. DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: United Way of Long Island Housing

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Development Corporation, Patchogue, NY | Department of Energy United Way of Long Island Housing Development Corporation, Patchogue, NY DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: United Way of Long Island Housing Development Corporation, Patchogue, NY DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: United Way of Long Island Housing Development Corporation, Patchogue, NY Case study of a DOE 2015 Housing Innovation Award winning affordable home in the mixed-humid climate that got HERS 40 without PV, -3 with

  11. U.S. Total Exports

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    International Falls, MN Noyes, MN Warroad, MN Babb, MT Havre, MT Port of Del Bonita, MT Port of Morgan, MT Sweetgrass, MT Whitlash, MT Portal, ND Sherwood, ND Pittsburg, NH Champlain, NY Grand Island, NY Massena, NY Niagara Falls, NY Waddington, NY Sumas, WA Highgate Springs, VT North Troy, VT U.S. Pipeline Total from Mexico Ogilby, CA Otay Mesa, CA Alamo, TX El Paso, TX Galvan Ranch, TX Hidalgo, TX McAllen, TX Penitas, TX LNG Imports from Algeria Cove Point, MD Everett, MA Lake Charles, LA LNG

  12. U.S. Total Exports

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Warroad, MN Babb, MT Havre, MT Port of Morgan, MT Sherwood, ND Pittsburg, NH Buffalo, NY Grand Island, NY Massena, NY Niagara Falls, NY Waddington, NY Sumas, WA Sweetgrass, MT Total to Chile Sabine Pass, LA Total to China Kenai, AK Sabine Pass, LA Total to Egypt Freeport, TX Total to India Freeport, TX Sabine Pass, LA Total to Japan Cameron, LA Freeport, TX Kenai, AK Port Nikiski, AK Sabine Pass, LA Total to Mexico Douglas, AZ Nogales, AZ Sasabe, AZ Calexico, CA Ogilby Mesa, CA Otay Mesa, CA San

  13. U.S. Total Exports

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Babb, MT Havre, MT Port of Morgan, MT Sherwood, ND Pittsburg, NH Buffalo, NY Grand Island, NY Massena, NY Niagara Falls, NY Waddington, NY Sumas, WA Sweetgrass, MT Total to Chile Sabine Pass, LA Total to China Kenai, AK Sabine Pass, LA Total to Egypt Freeport, TX Total to India Freeport, TX Sabine Pass, LA Total to Japan Cameron, LA Kenai, AK Sabine Pass, LA Total to Mexico Douglas, AZ Nogales, AZ Sasabe, AZ Calexico, CA Ogilby Mesa, CA Otay Mesa, CA Alamo, TX Clint, TX Del Rio, TX Eagle Pass,

  14. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Carnegie Institute of Washington Dept

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    of Genetics - NY 0-07 Carnegie Institute of Washington Dept of Genetics - NY 0-07 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Carnegie Institute of Washington (Dept. of Genetics) (NY.0-07 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Cold Spring Harbor , New York NY.0-07-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.0-07-1 Site Operations: This site served as a meeting place on June 25, 1942 for the 'Executive Committee of S-1,' a group comprised of various

  15. Assessment of alternatives for long-term management of uranium ore residues and contaminated soils located at DOE's Niagara Falls Storage Site

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Merry-Libby, P.

    1984-11-05

    About 11,000 m/sup 3/ of uranium ore residues and 180,000 m/sup 3/ of wastes (mostly slightly contaminated soils) are consolidated within a diked containment area at the Niagara Falls Storage Site (NFSS) located about 30 km north of Buffalo, NY. The residues account for less than 6% of the total volume of contaminated materials but almost 99% of the radioactivty. The average /sup 226/Ra concentration in the residues is 67,000 pCi/g. Several alternatives for long-term management of the wastes and residues are being considered, including: improvement of the containment at NFSS, modification of the form of the residues, management of the residues separately from the wastes, management of the wastes and residues at another humid site (Oak Ridge, TN) or arid site (Hanford, WA), and dispersal of the wastes in the ocean. Potential radiological risks are expected to be smaller than the nonradiological risks of occupational and transportation-related injuries and deaths. Dispersal of the slightly contaminated wastes in the ocean is not expected to result in any significant impacts on the ocean environment or pose any significant radiological risk to humans. It will be necessary to take perpetual care of the near-surface burial sites because the residues and wastes will remain hazardous for thousands of years. If controls cease, the radioactive materials will eventually be dispersed in the environment. Predicted loss of the earthen covers over the buried materials ranges from several hundred to more than two million years, depending primarily on the use of the land surface. Groundwater will eventually be contaminated in all alternatives; however, the groundwater pathway is relatively insignificant with respect to radiological risks to the general population. A person intruding into the residues would incur an extremely high radiation dose.

  16. An Overview of the Cooperative Effort between the United States Department of Energy and the China Atomic Energy Authority to Enhance MPC&A Inspections for Civil Nuclear Facilities in China

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Ahern, Keith; Daming, Liu; Hanley, Tim; Livingston, Linwood; McAninch, Connie; McGinnis, Brent R; Ning, Shen; Qun, Yang; Roback, Jason William; Tuttle, Glenn; Xuemei, Gao; Galer, Regina; Peterson, Nancy; Jia, Jinlie

    2011-01-01

    The United States Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE/NNSA) and the China Atomic Energy Authority (CAEA) are cooperating to enhance the domestic regulatory inspections capacity for special nuclear material protection, control and accounting (MPC&A) requirements for civil nuclear facilities in China. This cooperation is conducted under the auspices of the Agreement between the Department of Energy of the United States of America and the State Development and Planning Commission of the People s Republic of China on Cooperation Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Technology. This initial successful effort was conducted in three phases. Phase I focused on introducing CAEA personnel to DOE and U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspection methods for U. S. facilities. This phase was completed in January 2008 during meetings in Beijing. Phase II focused on developing physical protection and material control and accounting inspection exercises that enforced U. S. inspection methods identified during Phase 1. Hands on inspection activities were conducted in the United States over a two week period in July 2009. Simulated deficiencies were integrated into the inspection exercises. The U. S. and Chinese participants actively identified and discussed deficiencies noted during the two week training course. The material control and accounting inspection exercises were conducted at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PGDP) in Paducah, KY. The physical protection inspection exercises were conducted at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) in Oak Ridge, TN. Phase III leveraged information provided under Phase I and experience gained under Phase II to develop a formal inspection guide that incorporates a systematic approach to training for Chinese MPC&A field inspectors. Additional hands on exercises that are applicable to Chinese regulations were incorporated into the Phase III training material. Phase III was completed in May 2010 at the China Institute of Atomic Energy (CIAE) in Beijing. This paper provides details of the successful cooperation between DOE/NNSA and CAEA for all phases of the cooperative effort to enhance civil domestic MPC&A inspections in China.

  17. Bioten Power and Energy Group | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Group Address: 2725 Russell Rd Place: Utica, KY Zip: 42376 Sector: Biomass Product: Gasification technology Number of Employees: 1-10 Year Founded: 2008 Phone Number: 270-275-9164...

  18. Reconfiguration of Paducah Site's Electrical Distribution Provides...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    PADUCAH, Ky. - While EM's Paducah Site is preparing its gaseous diffusion plant (GDP) ... Currently, electricity consumption at the site is only about 0.5 percent of what was used ...

  19. DOE Dunking Booth Helps Paducah Charities

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    PADUCAH, KY – The Department of Energy (DOE) and its Paducah contractors have raised nearly $1,100 to help restock the shelves of six Paducah service organizations that help the hungry.

  20. Paducah CAB Subcommittee Meeting - January | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    - January January 21, 2016 5:30PM to 7:00PM CST Paducah CAB Office, 111 Memorial Drive, Paducah, KY 42001 Contact Buz Smith, DOE Site Office 270-441-6821 www.pgdpcab.energy.gov...

  1. Paducah CAB Board Meeting - November | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    5 6:00PM to 8:00PM CST Paducah CAB Office, 111 Memorial Drive, Paducah, KY 42001 Contact Buz Smith, DOE Site Office 270-441-6821 www.pgdpcab.energy.gov...

  2. Preparation Helps Paducah Site Weather Tornado

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    PADUCAH, Ky. – Emergency management is a systematic, integrated effort at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PGDP) site, a sprawling complex with more than 500 facilities and multiple work organizations.

  3. Workers Demolishing Significant Inactive Facility at Paducah Site

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    PADUCAH, Ky. – Heavy equipment operators are demolishing the last of 32 inactive facilities scheduled to be removed as part of the current cleanup scope at EM’s Paducah Site.

  4. This list does not imply DOE endorsement of the individuals or...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... 213-244-3325 CA Pappe, Mike mike.pappe@johnzink.com 661-588-5095 CA Peet, Kenneth kpeet@lse-engineering.com 502-584-8930 KY Phillips, Craig craig.phillips@cascadeenergy...

  5. CBR-1-H Wholesale Power Rate Schedule | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CBR-1-H Wholesale Power Rate Schedule CBR-1-H Wholesale Power Rate Schedule Area: Big Rivers and Henderson, KY System: CU This rate schedule shall be available to Big Rivers ...

  6. ORAU Team

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    (EA) CONTACTS: For further information on this EA, please contact: Robert "Buz" Smith U.S. Department of Energy - Paducah 5501 Hobbs Road C103 Paducah, KY 42053 E-mail:...

  7. untitled

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    2005 (Thousand Barrels) East Coast Appalachian No. 1 Total IN, IL, KY MN, WI, ND, SD OK, KS, MO Total Liquefied Refinery Gases 382 8 390 2,072 157 116 2,345 EthaneEthylene 10...

  8. untitled

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    2005 (Thousand Barrels) East Coast Appalachian No. 1 Total IN, IL, KY MN, WI, ND, SD OK, KS, MO Total Liquefied Refinery Gases 331 -18 313 2,398 -147 -220 2,031 EthaneEthylene...

  9. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Xiaofeng" Name Name ORCID Search Authors Type: All BookMonograph ConferenceEvent Journal ... St Andrews KY16 9ST ; Department of Microbiology, College of Resource and Environment ...

  10. DUF6 News | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    PADUCAH, Ky. - After more than doubling production in fiscal year 2013, the Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride (DUF6) Conversion Project is moving from start-up mode to full production ...

  11. Paducah CAB Subcommittee Meetings - February (re-scheduled from...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    from January) February 4, 2016 5:00PM to 7:00PM CST Paducah CAB Office, 111 Memorial Drive, Paducah, KY 42001 Contact Buz Smith, DOE Site Office 270-441-6821 www.pgdpcab

  12. Paducah CAB Subcommittee Meetings - February (re-scheduled from...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    from January) February 18, 2016 5:00PM to 7:00PM CST Paducah CAB Office, 111 Memorial Drive, Paducah, KY 42001 Contact Buz Smith, DOE Site Office 270-441-6821 www.pgdpcab

  13. City of Murray, Kentucky (Utility Company) | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    City of Murray, Kentucky (Utility Company) Jump to: navigation, search Name: City of Murray Place: Kentucky Phone Number: (270) 753-5312 Website: www2.murray-ky.net Twitter:...

  14. Utilities and Workplace Charging

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Summit Mike Waters - Duke Energy November 18th, 2014 Duke Energy Electricity provider for over 7.2 million retail customers 6 states: NC, SC, FL, OH, IN, KY 104,000 sq....

  15. " Million Housing Units, Final...

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    0 Water Heating in U.S. Homes in South Region, Divisions, and States, 2009" " Million ... MD, WV",,,,"AL, KY, MS",,,"AR, LA, OK" "Water Heating",,,,"VA","GA","FL",,"NC, ...

  16. Paducah CAB Board meeting - August | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    27, 2015 6:00PM to 8:00PM CDT Paducah CAB Office, 111 Memorial Drive, Paducah, KY 42001 Contact Buz Smith, DOE Site Office 270-441-6821 www.pgdpcab.energy.gov...

  17. PSA Vol 1 Tables Revised Ver 2 Print.xls

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Refinery and Blender Net Production of Finished Petroleum Products by PAD and Refining Districts, 2005 (Thousand Barrels) East Coast Appalachian No. 1 Total IN, IL, KY MN, WI, ND,...

  18. Department of Energy’s Paducah Site Reaches Million-Hour Safety Milestone

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    PADUCAH, KY – The U.S. Department of Energy’s Paducah Site has reached a million hours of safe work toward completing cleanup objectives to reduce environmental risk.

  19. Wholesale Power Rate Schedules | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Power Rate Schedules October 1, 2011 CBR-1-H Wholesale Power Rate Schedule Area: Big Rivers and Henderson, KY System: CU October 1, 2011 CM-1-H Wholesale Power Rate...

  20. Workers at Paducah Site Exceed 1.5 Million Hours Without Lost-Time Injury, Illness

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    PADUCAH, Ky. – Workers with Paducah site infrastructure contractor Swift & Staley, Inc. recently exceeded 1.5 million hours without lost time away from work due to injury or illness, representing nine years of safe performance.