Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "job safety analysis" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

FAQS JOB TASK ANALYSIS - Electrical Systems and Safety Oversight  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Electrical Systems and Safety Oversight Electrical Systems and Safety Oversight Step 1 Identify and evaluate tasks - Develop a comprehensive list of tasks that define the job. o A great starting point is the list of Duties and Responsibilities from the FAQS. o Give careful thought to additional tasks that could be considered. o Don't worry about deleting tasks at this point - that is a part of the process further down. - List the tasks (and their sources, e.g., Duties and Responsibilities #1) in the chart below. - Discuss each task as a group and come to a consensus pertaining to Importance and Frequency of the task (i.e., each team member can consent to the assigned value, even if they don't exactly agree with it). - When all values have been assigned, consider as a group deleting tasks that receive

2

Job Safety and Health Poster  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Department of Energy (DOE) Job Safety and Health poster. DOE Order 440.1B and title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, part 851 both require that a worker safety and health poster be posted in a prominent location to inform employees of their rights and responsibilities. This poster serves as a single DOE poster for both Federal and contractor employees.

3

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Nuclear Safety Specialist  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

JOB / TASK ANALYSIS for JOB / TASK ANALYSIS for Nuclear Safety Specialist (NSS) Functional Area Qualification Standard (FAQS) DOE-STD-1183-2007 Instructions for Step 1: Step 1 Identify and evaluate tasks - Develop a comprehensive list of tasks that define the job. o A great starting point is the list of Duties and Responsibilities from the FAQS. o Give careful thought to additional tasks that could be considered. o Don't worry about deleting tasks at this point - that is a part of the process further down. - List the tasks (and their sources, e.g., Duties and Responsibilities #1) in the chart below. - Discuss each task as a group and come to a consensus pertaining to Importance and Frequency of the task (i.e., each team member can consent to the assigned value, even

4

Job Safety and Health Poster Worker Rights | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Job Safety and Health Poster Worker Rights Job Safety and Health Poster Worker Rights Department of Energy (DOE) Job Safety and Health poster. DOE Order 440.1B Worker Protection...

5

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Electrical Systems and Safety Oversight...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Electrical Systems and Safety Oversight FAQS Job Task Analyses - Electrical Systems and Safety Oversight FAQS Job Task Analyses are performed on the Function Area Qualification...

6

FAQS Job Task Analyses - DOE AVIATION SAFETY OFFICER (ASO)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SAFETY OFFICER (ASO) - JOB TASK ANALYSIS SAFETY OFFICER (ASO) - JOB TASK ANALYSIS Job Analysis Worksheet for Task DOE AVIATION SAFETY OFFICER Task Source Importance Frequency A Gathers, trends, and analyzes aviation safety performance data to ensure the safety of the field aviation program. DOE O 440.2C, chng 1 4 3 B Conducts periodic assessments of aviation activities to ensure that requirements, policies, and procedures are implemented and followed and prepares reports documenting assessment findings, concerns, and recommendations and tracks corrective actions to help prevent similar occurrences. DOE O 440.2C, chng 1 4 3 C Participates as directed in aviation accident or incident investigations and provides assistance to accident investigation boards during their investigations.

7

Automated Job Hazards Analysis  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

AJHA Program - The Automated Job Hazard Analysis (AJHA) computer program is part of an enhanced work planning process employed at the Department of Energy's Hanford worksite. The AJHA system is routinely used to performed evaluations for medium and high risk work, and in the development of corrective maintenance work packages at the site. The tool is designed to ensure that workers are fully involved in identifying the hazards, requirements, and controls associated with tasks.

8

Table-top job analysis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this Handbook is to establish general training program guidelines for training personnel in developing training for operation, maintenance, and technical support personnel at Department of Energy (DOE) nuclear facilities. TTJA is not the only method of job analysis; however, when conducted properly TTJA can be cost effective, efficient, and self-validating, and represents an effective method of defining job requirements. The table-top job analysis is suggested in the DOE Training Accreditation Program manuals as an acceptable alternative to traditional methods of analyzing job requirements. DOE 5480-20A strongly endorses and recommends it as the preferred method for analyzing jobs for positions addressed by the Order.

Not Available

1994-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

9

NREL: Jobs and Economic Competitiveness - Jobs Analysis  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Targeted investments in wind and solar projects can result in positive jobs creation and return on investment at national and state levels Investments impact all sectors of the...

10

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Nuclear Explosive Safety Study  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Nuclear Explosive Safety Study FAQS Nuclear Explosive Safety Study FAQS STEP 1: Job Task Analysis for Tasks Task (and Number) Source Importance Frequency (1) Serves as a member or chair of the NESSG. FAQS Duties and Responsibilities Paragraph A 5 3 (2) Provides guidance on and interpretation of nuclear explosive safety (NES) requirements and policy. FAQS Duties and Responsibilities Paragraph B 5 4 (3) Drafts policy directives for the DOE/NNSA, Nuclear Explosive Safety Operations Branch (NESB) and reviews DOE/NNSA policies on NES. FAQS Duties and Responsibilities Paragraph D 5 3 (4) Provides instruction and guidance regarding NES to individuals assigned NES responsibilities. FAQS Duties and Responsibilities Paragraph E 5 3-4 (5) Monitors ongoing NEOs to ensure compliance with NES standards and

11

FAQS Job Task Analyses- Nuclear Safety Specialist  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

FAQS Job Task Analyses are performed on the Function Area Qualification Standards. The FAQS Job Task Analyses consists of: Developing a comprehensive list of tasks that define the job such as the duties and responsibilities which include determining their levels of importance and frequency. Identifying and evaluating competencies. Last step is evaluating linkage between job tasks and competencies.

12

Employee Job Task Analysis (EJTA) PIA, Richland Operations Office...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Employee Job Task Analysis (EJTA) PIA, Richland Operations Office Employee Job Task Analysis (EJTA) PIA, Richland Operations Office Employee Job Task Analysis (EJTA) PIA, Richland...

13

Job Safety Health Poster Spanish 09042014.docx  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ms informacin: Este aviso: http:www.energy.govehssdownloadsjob-safety-and-health-poster-worker-rights Requisitos para los empleados Federales: www.directives.doe.gov...

14

Job analysis and job satisfaction : case Hello Cafe and SSP Finland Ltd.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??The objective of this research was to study the relationship between job analysis and job satisfaction by using a qualitative research method. This study is… (more)

Boulanger, Julien

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

15

Webinar: DOE Launches JOBS and Economic Impacts of Fuel Cells (JOBS FC) Analysis Model  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Video recording and text version of the webinar titled, DOE Launches JOBS and Economic Impacts of Fuel Cells (JOBS FC) Analysis Model, originally presented on May 22, 2012.

16

NREL Job Task Analysis: Retrofit Installer Technician | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

51671.pdf More Documents & Publications NREL Job Task Analysis: Retrofit Installer Technician (Revised) NREL Job Task Analysis: Energy Auditor trainingselfassessment.xlsx...

17

NREL Job Task Analysis: Retrofit Installer Technician (Revised...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

installerjta04112012.pdf More Documents & Publications NREL Job Task Analysis: Retrofit Installer Technician NREL Job Task Analysis: Energy Auditor trainingselfassessment.xlsx...

18

NREL Job Task Analysis: Energy Auditor | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Energy Auditor NREL Job Task Analysis: Energy Auditor A summary of job task analyses for the position of energy auditor when evaluating a residence before and during weatherization...

19

NREL Job Task Analysis: Crew Leader | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Crew Leader NREL Job Task Analysis: Crew Leader A summary of job task analyses for the position of crew leader when conducting weatherization work on a residence. NREL Job Task...

20

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Senior Technical Safety Manager  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Worksheet For Duties and Responsibilities Worksheet For Duties and Responsibilities Ratings were arrived at by analyzing all rating inputs Importance Scale Frequency How important is this task to the job? How often is the task performed? 0 = Not Performed 0 = Not Performed 1 = Not Important 1 = Every few months to yearly 2 = Somewhat Important 2 = Every few weeks to monthly 3 = Important 3 = Every few days to weekly 4 = Very Important 4 = Every few hours to daily 5 = Extremely Important 5 = Hourly to many times each hour Duties and Responsibilities Source Importance Frequency #1 - Integrate safety into management and work practices to accomplish mission objectives, while ensuring worker and public health and safety, and the protection of the environment. This includes

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "job safety analysis" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

FAQS Job Task Analyses- DOE Aviation Safety Officer  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

FAQS Job Task Analyses are performed on the Function Area Qualification Standards. The FAQS Job Task Analyses consists of: Developing a comprehensive list of tasks that define the job such as the duties and responsibilities which include determining their levels of importance and frequency. Identifying and evaluating competencies. Last step is evaluating linkage between job tasks and competencies.

22

Documented Safety Analysis  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Documented Safety Analysis Documented Safety Analysis FUNCTIONAL AREA GOAL: A document that provides an adequate description of the hazards of a facility during its design, construction, operation, and eventual cleanup and the basis to prescribe operating and engineering controls through Technical Safety Requirements (TSR) or Administrative Controls (AC). REQUIREMENTS: ï‚· 10 CFR 830.204, Nuclear Safety Rule ï‚· DOE-STD-1027-92, Hazard Categorization, 1992. ï‚· DOE-STD-1104-96, Change Notice 1, Review and Approval of Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Documents (documented Safety Analyses and Technical Safety Requirements), dated May 2002. ï‚· DOE-STD-3009-2002, Preparation Guide for U. S. Department of Energy Nonreactor Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analyses, Change Notice No. 2, April 2002.

23

CRAD, Nuclear Safety Delegations for Documented Safety Analysis...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Nuclear Safety Delegations for Documented Safety Analysis Approval - January 8, 2015 (EA CRAD 31-09, Rev. 0) CRAD, Nuclear Safety Delegations for Documented Safety Analysis...

24

Jobs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Jobs Jobs /careers/_assets/images/careers-icon.jpg Jobs Explore the multiple dimensions of a career at LANL: work with the best minds on the planet in an inclusive environment that is rich in intellectual vitality and opportunities for growth. JOB OPENINGS Staff, students, postdocs All Jobs COMPA Industries, Inc. Contractor Jobs Current employees Internal Jobs Fall 2013 Recruiting Events »» FEATURED JOBS MaRIE Capture Manager (Program Director 6), IRC31374 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM Los Alamos logo Los Alamos logo The MaRIE Capture Manager is responsible for developing the weapons science case, building the stakeholder community, and advancing MaRIE 1.0, through the early stages of the facility project acquisition, with a near term focus on CD-0 and CD-1. Specifically the Capture Manager

25

NREL Job Task Analysis: Quality Control Inspector | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Control Inspector More Documents & Publications trainingselfassessment.xlsx Preparing for the Quality Control Inspector Certification Exam NREL Job Task Analysis: Energy Auditor...

26

Jobs  

Office of Science (SC) Website

about/jobs/ Below is a list of currently open about/jobs/ Below is a list of currently open federal employment opportunities in the Office of Science. Prospective applicants should follow the links to the formal position announcements on USAJOBS.gov for more information. en {4D2B856C-39AE-4755-B38E-91319C75F8C9}https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/358553800 Physicist Facilities & Project Management Division Job Title: Physicist Facilities & Project Management DivisionOffice: Nuclear PhysicsURL: USAjobs listingVacancy Number: 14-DE-SC-HQ-003Location: Germantown, MDOpened: 01/14/2014Closes:

27

NREL Job Task Analysis: Quality Control Inspector  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A summary of job task analyses for the position of quality control inspector when evaluating weatherization work that has been done on a residence.

Kurnik, C.; Woodley, C.

2011-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

28

Technical Standards, Safety Analysis Toolbox Codes - November...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Standards, Safety Analysis Toolbox Codes - November 2003 November 2003 Software Quality Assurance Plan and Criteria for the Safety Analysis Toolbox Codes Safety analysis...

29

CRAD, Facility Safety- Documented Safety Analysis  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) that can be used for assessment of a contractor's Documented Safety Analysis.

30

Events Beyond Design Safety Basis Analysis | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Events Beyond Design Safety Basis Analysis Events Beyond Design Safety Basis Analysis March 23, 2011 Safety Bulletin 2011-01, Events Beyond Design Safety Basis Analysis This Safety...

31

Safety System Oversight Staffing Analysis (Instructions, Blank...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Safety System Oversight Staffing Analysis (Instructions, Blank Sheet and Example Sheet) Safety System Oversight Staffing Analysis (Instructions, Blank Sheet and Example Sheet) This...

32

B PLANT DOCUMENTED SAFETY ANALYSIS  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document provides the documented safety analysis (DSA) and Central Plateau Remediation Project (CP) requirements that apply to surveillance and maintenance (S&M) activities at the 221-B Canyon Building and ancillary support structures (B Plant). The document replaces BHI-010582, Documented Safety Analysis for the B-Plant Facility. The B Plant is non-operational, deactivated and undergoing long term S&M prior to decontamination and decommissioning (D&D). This DSA is compliant with 10 CFR 830, Nuclear Safety Management, Subpart B, ''Safety Basis Requirements.'' The DSA was developed in accordance with U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) standard DOE-STD-1120-98, Integration of Environment, Safety, and Health into Facility Disposition Activities (DOE 1998) per Table 2 of 10 CFR 830 Appendix A, DOE Richland Operation Office (RL) direction (02-ABD-0053, Fluor Hanford Nuclear Safety Basis Strategy and Criteria) for facilities in long term S&M, and RL Direction (02-ABD-0091, ''FHI Nuclear Safety Expectations for Nuclear Facilities in Surveillance and Maintenance''). A crosswalk was prepared to identify potential inconsistencies between the previous B Plant safety analysis and DOE-STD-1120-98 guidance. In general, the safety analysis met the criteria of DOE-STD-1120-98. Some format and content changes have been made, including incorporating recent facility modifications and updating the evaluation guidelines and control selection criteria in accordance with RL direction (02-ABD-0053). The facility fire hazard analysis (FHA) and Technical Safety Requirements (TSR) are appended to this DSA as an aid to the users, to minimize editorial redundancy, and to provide an efficient basis for update.

DODD, E.N.; KERR, N.R.

2003-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

33

Franklin Job Completion Analysis Yun (Helen) He, Hwa-Chun Wendy Lin, and  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Job Completion Analysis Job Completion Analysis Yun (Helen) He, Hwa-Chun Wendy Lin, and Woo-Sun Yang National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center CUG 2010, May 24-27, Edinburgh 2 Our Goal * Identify and track system issues that cause user jobs to fail. Work with Cray to get them fixed. * Job completion report, i.e. how many jobs ran successfully and how many jobs failed for what reasons. 3 Our Data Job Completion rate = Success + User related failures 4 User Related Job Failures * Application Errors: APEXIT, APNOENT, APRESOURCE, APWRAP * Runtime Errors: CCERUNTIME, PATHRUNTIME * MPI Errors: MPIABORT, MPIENV, MPIFATAL, MPIIO * IO Errors: PGFIO * PTL Errors: PTLUSER * Signal: SIGSEGV, SIGTERM, * Misc: XBIGOUT, DISKQUOTA, OOM, NIDTERM 5 System Related Job Failures

34

Job Task Analysis: Building Commissioning Professional; November 2013 - December 2014  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes the process for and results of a comprehensive job task analysis of Building Commissioning Professionals. This study was performed by Professional Testing on behalf of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). The competency (domains, tasks and associated knowledge) list, which defines the work performed by practitioners, was initially developed by a representative panel of practitioners during a meeting held on February 19?21, 2014 in Orlando Florida. Following the identification of the job tasks and associated knowledge and skills, a validation survey was conducted of the finding of the JTA and the results of the validation study were reviewed by a representative panel of practitioners during a conference call held on June 6, 2014. The committee finalized the JTA and examination blueprints for the Building Commissioning credential scheme based on the survey results.

Woodley, C.; DePascale, C.

2015-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

35

Job Task Analysis: Building Energy Auditor; November 2013 - December 2014  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes the process for and results of a comprehensive job task analysis of Energy Auditors. This study was performed by Professional Testing on behalf of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). The competency (domains, tasks and associated knowledge) list, which defines the work performed by practitioners, was initially developed by a representative panel of practitioners during a meeting held on February 3?5, 2014 in Orlando Florida. Following the identification of the job tasks and associated knowledge and skills, a validation survey was conducted of the finding of the JTA and the results of the validation study were reviewed by a representative panel of practitioners during a conference call held on May 29, 2014. The committee finalized the JTA and examination blueprints for the Energy Auditor credential scheme based on the survey results.

Woodley, C. D.

2015-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

36

Job Task Analysis: Energy Manager; November 2013 - December 2014  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes the process for and results of a comprehensive job task analysis of Energy Managers. This study was performed by Professional Testing on behalf of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). The competency (domains, tasks and associated knowledge) list, which defines the work performed by practitioners, was initially developed by a representative panel of practitioners during a meeting held on January 22?24, 2014 in Orlando Florida. Following the identification of the job tasks and associated knowledge and skills, a validation survey was conducted of the finding of the JTA and the results of the validation study were reviewed by a representative panel of practitioners during a conference call held on June 2, 2014. The committee finalized the JTA and examination blueprints for the Energy Manager credential scheme based on the survey results.

Woodley, C. D.

2015-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

37

Job Task Analysis: Building Operations Professional; February - December 2014  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes the process for and results of a comprehensive job task analysis of Building Operations Professionals. This study was performed by Professional Testing on behalf of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). The competency (domains, tasks and associated knowledge) list, which defines the work performed by practitioners, was initially developed by a representative panel of practitioners during a meeting held on February 10-12, 2014 in Orlando Florida. Following the identification of the job tasks and associated knowledge and skills, a validation survey was conducted of the finding of the JTA and the results of the validation study were reviewed by a representative panel of practitioners during a conference call held on May 30, 2014. The committee finalized the JTA and examination blueprints for the Building Operations Professional credential scheme based on the survey results.

Woodley, C. D.

2015-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

38

Radiation Protection Job-Task-Analysis and Recommendations  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

& NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION & NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Radiation Protection Job-Task-Analysis and Recommendations Sanders, David Parker, Jack Wu, Sarah 11/15/2012 R a d i a t i o n P r o t e c t i o n T a s k - A n a l y s i s a n d R e c o m m e n d a t i o n s P a g e | 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary................................................................................................ 2 Acronyms ............................................................................................................... 3 Purpose .................................................................................................................. 4 Scope ..................................................................................................................... 4 Team Participants .................................................................................................. 4

39

Corporate Analysis of DOE Safety Performance | Department of...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Analysis of DOE Safety Performance Current Safety Performance Trends The Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security, Office of Analysis provides analysis of Department of...

40

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences - February...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences - February 2012 February 2012 An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "job safety analysis" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences - November...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences - November 2011 November 2011 An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by...

42

Internet Resources for Job Safety and Health Compiled by Tim Morse, Ph.D., at the ErgoCenter at the University of Connecticut Health Center  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Internet Resources for Job Safety and Health Compiled by Tim Morse, Ph.D., at the Ergo on the internet is the OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) homepage, which includes an ergonomics homepage, a searchable index of standards, and a listing of health and safety sites on the internet. http

Oliver, Douglas L.

43

CRAD, New Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analysis and Technical...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

New Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analysis and Technical Safety Requirements - December 2, 2014 (EA CRAD 31-07, Rev. 0) CRAD, New Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analysis...

44

Methods and criteria for safety analysis (FIN L2535)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In response to the NRC request for a proposal dated October 20, 1992, Westinghouse Savannah River Company (WSRC) submit this proposal to provide contractural assistance for FIN L2535, ``Methods and Criteria for Safety Analysis,`` as specified in the Statement of Work attached to the request for proposal. The Statement of Work involves development of safety analysis guidance for NRC licensees, arranging a workshop on this guidance, and revising NRC Regulatory Guide 3.52. This response to the request for proposal offers for consideration the following advantages of WSRC in performing this work: Experience, Qualification of Personnel and Resource Commitment, Technical and Organizational Approach, Mobilization Plan, Key Personnel and Resumes. In addition, attached are the following items required by the NRC: Schedule II, Savannah River Site - Job Cost Estimate, NRC Form 189, Project and Budget Proposal for NRC Work, page 1, NRC Form 189, Project and Budget Proposal for NRC Work, page 2, Project Description.

Not Available

1992-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

45

DOE's Safety Bulletin No. 2011-01, Events Beyond Design Safety Basis Analysis, March 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This Safety Alert provides information on a safety concern related to the identification and mitigation of events that may fall outside those analyzed in the documented safety analysis.

46

A framework for graph-based synthesis, analysis, and visualization of HPC cluster job data.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The monitoring and system analysis of high performance computing (HPC) clusters is of increasing importance to the HPC community. Analysis of HPC job data can be used to characterize system usage and diagnose and examine failure modes and their effects. This analysis is not straightforward, however, due to the complex relationships that exist between jobs. These relationships are based on a number of factors, including shared compute nodes between jobs, proximity of jobs in time, etc. Graph-based techniques represent an approach that is particularly well suited to this problem, and provide an effective technique for discovering important relationships in job queuing and execution data. The efficacy of these techniques is rooted in the use of a semantic graph as a knowledge representation tool. In a semantic graph job data, represented in a combination of numerical and textual forms, can be flexibly processed into edges, with corresponding weights, expressing relationships between jobs, nodes, users, and other relevant entities. This graph-based representation permits formal manipulation by a number of analysis algorithms. This report presents a methodology and software implementation that leverages semantic graph-based techniques for the system-level monitoring and analysis of HPC clusters based on job queuing and execution data. Ontology development and graph synthesis is discussed with respect to the domain of HPC job data. The framework developed automates the synthesis of graphs from a database of job information. It also provides a front end, enabling visualization of the synthesized graphs. Additionally, an analysis engine is incorporated that provides performance analysis, graph-based clustering, and failure prediction capabilities for HPC systems.

Mayo, Jackson R.; Kegelmeyer, W. Philip, Jr.; Wong, Matthew H.; Pebay, Philippe Pierre; Gentile, Ann C.; Thompson, David C.; Roe, Diana C.; De Sapio, Vincent; Brandt, James M.

2010-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

47

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences - March 2011...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences - March 2011 Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences - March 2011 March 2011 An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and...

48

Autoclave nuclear criticality safety analysis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Steam-heated autoclaves are used in gaseous diffusion uranium enrichment plants to heat large cylinders of UF{sub 6}. Nuclear criticality safety for these autoclaves is evaluated. To enhance criticality safety, systems are incorporated into the design of autoclaves to limit the amount of water present. These safety systems also increase the likelihood that any UF{sub 6} inadvertently released from a cylinder into an autoclave is not released to the environment. Up to 140 pounds of water can be held up in large autoclaves. This mass of water is sufficient to support a nuclear criticality when optimally combined with 125 pounds of UF{sub 6} enriched to 5 percent U{sup 235}. However, water in autoclaves is widely dispersed as condensed droplets and vapor, and is extremely unlikely to form a critical configuration with released UF{sub 6}.

D`Aquila, D.M. [Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc., Piketon, OH (United States); Tayloe, R.W. Jr. [Battelle, Columbus, OH (United States)

1991-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

49

DOE's Safety Bulletin No. 2011-01, Events Beyond Design Safety Basis Analysis, March 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

PURPOSE This Safety Alert provides information on a safety concern related to the identification and mitigation of events that may fall outside those analyzed in the documented safety analysis.

50

Job Opening Research Associate/Post-Doctoral Fellow for Interdisciplinary Study on Nuclear Safety  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

public opinion surveys; experience in organizing and conducting focus group meetings; good journal to work independently. The appointee will assist in designing public opinion surveys, focusing for Interdisciplinary Study on Nuclear Safety Governance, University of Hong Kong

Leung, Ka-Cheong

51

On the Integration of Requirements Analysis and Safety Analysis for Safety-Critical Software  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

this is acceptable within the context of system risk. The advantage of conducting the safety analysis during is acceptable within the overall #12;2 system risk. If the risk is not acceptable the safety specification has analysis is to determine the risk associated with requirements specifications and assess whether

Newcastle upon Tyne, University of

52

K West integrated water treatment system subproject safety analysis document  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Accident Analysis evaluates unmitigated accident scenarios, and identifies Safety Significant and Safety Class structures, systems, and components for the K West Integrated Water Treatment System.

SEMMENS, L.S.

1999-02-24T23:59:59.000Z

53

Analysis of Job Creation and Energy Cost Savings From Building Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Analysis of Job Creation and Energy Cost Savings From Building Analysis of Job Creation and Energy Cost Savings From Building Energy Rating and Disclosure Policy Secondary menu About us Press room Contact Us Portfolio Manager Login Facility owners and managers Existing buildings Commercial new construction Industrial energy management Small business Service providers Service and product providers Verify applications for ENERGY STAR certification Design commercial buildings Energy efficiency program administrators Commercial and industrial program sponsors Associations State and local governments Federal agencies Tools and resources Training In This Section Campaigns Commercial building design Communications resources Energy management guidance Financial resources Portfolio Manager Products and purchasing Recognition Research and reports

54

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Safety Analysis Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The following provides a summary of the specific issues addressed in this FY-95 Annual Update as they relate to the CH TRU safety bases: Executive Summary; Site Characteristics; Principal Design and Safety Criteria; Facility Design and Operation; Hazards and Accident Analysis; Derivation of Technical Safety Requirements; Radiological and Hazardous Material Protection; Institutional Programs; Quality Assurance; and Decontamination and Decommissioning. The System Design Descriptions`` (SDDS) for the WIPP were reviewed and incorporated into Chapter 3, Principal Design and Safety Criteria and Chapter 4, Facility Design and Operation. This provides the most currently available final engineering design information on waste emplacement operations throughout the disposal phase up to the point of permanent closure. Also, the criteria which define the TRU waste to be accepted for disposal at the WIPP facility were summarized in Chapter 3 based on the WAC for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.`` This Safety Analysis Report (SAR) documents the safety analyses that develop and evaluate the adequacy of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Contact-Handled Transuranic Wastes (WIPP CH TRU) safety bases necessary to ensure the safety of workers, the public and the environment from the hazards posed by WIPP waste handling and emplacement operations during the disposal phase and hazards associated with the decommissioning and decontamination phase. The analyses of the hazards associated with the long-term (10,000 year) disposal of TRU and TRU mixed waste, and demonstration of compliance with the requirements of 40 CFR 191, Subpart B and 40 CFR 268.6 will be addressed in detail in the WIPP Final Certification Application scheduled for submittal in October 1996 (40 CFR 191) and the No-Migration Variance Petition (40 CFR 268.6) scheduled for submittal in June 1996. Section 5.4, Long-Term Waste Isolation Assessment summarizes the current status of the assessment.

NONE

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

55

Hanford safety analysis and risk assessment handbook (SARAH)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of the Hanford Safety Analysis and Risk Assessment Handbook (SARAH) is to support the development of safety basis documentation for Hazard Category 1,2, and 3 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) nuclear facilities. SARAH describes currently acceptable methodology for development of a Documented Safety Analysis (DSA) and derivation of technical safety requirements (TSR) based on 10 CFR 830, ''Nuclear Safety Management,'' Subpart B, ''Safety Basis Requirements,'' and provides data to ensure consistency in approach.

GARVIN, L.J.

2003-01-20T23:59:59.000Z

56

Technical Standards, Safety Analysis Toolbox Codes - November 2003 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Safety Analysis Toolbox Codes - November 2003 Safety Analysis Toolbox Codes - November 2003 Technical Standards, Safety Analysis Toolbox Codes - November 2003 November 2003 Software Quality Assurance Plan and Criteria for the Safety Analysis Toolbox Codes Safety analysis software for the DOE "toolbox" was designated by DOE/EH in March 2003 (DOE/EH, 2003). The supporting basis for this designation was provided by a DOE-chartered Safety Analysis Software Group in the technical report, Selection of Computer Codes for DOE Safety Analysis Applications, (August, 2002). Technical Standards, Safety Analysis Toolbox Codes More Documents & Publications DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance Technical Standards, MELCOR - Gap Analysis - May 3, 2004

57

SAFETY AND RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF NUCLEAR REACTORS  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract A survey of the various aspects of safety and reliability analysis of nuclear reactors is presented with particular emphasis on the interrelation between structural reliability and systems reliability. In reactor design this interrelation is of overriding importance since it is the task of the control, protective and containment systems to protect the mechanical system and the structure from accidental overloading.

T.A. JAEGER

1972-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

58

Safety Analysis, Hazard and Risk Evaluations [Nuclear Waste Management  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Safety Analysis, Hazard Safety Analysis, Hazard and Risk Evaluations Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Management Technologies Overview Modeling and analysis Unit Process Modeling Mass Tracking System Software Waste Form Performance Modeling Safety Analysis, Hazard and Risk Evaluations Development, Design, Operation Overview Systems and Components Development Expertise System Engineering Design Other Major Programs Work with Argonne Contact us For Employees Site Map Help Join us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter NE Division on Flickr Nuclear Waste Management using Electrometallurgical Technology Safety Analysis, Hazard and Risk Evaluations Bookmark and Share NE Division personnel had a key role in the creation of the FCF Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), FCF Technical Safety Requirements (TSR)

59

CRAD, Nuclear Safety Delegations for Documented Safety Analysis Approval – January 8, 2015 (EA CRAD 31-09, Rev. 0)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

CRAD, Nuclear Safety Delegations for Documented Safety Analysis Approval – January 8, 2015 (EA CRAD 31-09, Rev. 0)

60

Employee Job Task Analysis (EJTA) - HPMC Occupational Health...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Analysis Human Reliability Program (HRP) Industrial Rehabilitation & Ergonomics Infection Control & Immunizations Influenza Immunization Program Medical Exam Scheduling Medical...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "job safety analysis" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

CRAD, Preliminary Documented Safety Analysis - July 25, 2014...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Preliminary Documented Safety Analysis - July 25, 2014 (IEA CRAD 31-2, REV. 0) CRAD, Preliminary Documented Safety Analysis - July 25, 2014 (IEA CRAD 31-2, REV. 0) July 25, 2014...

62

NREL: Jobs and Economic Competitiveness - Clean Energy Innovation Analysis  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Clean Energy Innovation Analysis Clean Energy Innovation Analysis With increased global competition for market share in alternative energy, innovation in energy will be a major contributor to national economic competitiveness in the coming decades. NREL's innovation analysis focuses on understanding the innovation dynamics of clean energy technologies to inform research investment decisions and innovation and technology transfer policy. NREL's innovation analysis studies show that: Different energy technology areas exhibit unique patterns of invention and innovation. New empirical methods of estimating technical and commercial impact (based on analysis of patent citations and web presence) to better target research expenditures could augment the speed and scale of innovation and deployment of clean energy technologies

63

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Fire Protection Engineering  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Job Task Analysis and Competency Review Job Task Analysis and Competency Review for All Level Competencies Fire Protection Engineering FAQS Initially conducted (expert competencies): August 2010 Updated (includes ALL Competencies): April 2011 Updated (includes ALL Competencies): October 2012 STEP 1: Job Task Analysis for Tasks Task (and Number) Source Importance Frequency Serve as the subject matter expert in the area of fire protection, life safety, and fire department emergency related services. FAQS Duties and Responsibilities Paragraph A 5 4 Review fire hazard analyses, assessments, and other fire safety documentation for compliance with applicable requirements. FAQS Duties and Responsibilities Paragraph B 5 3 Evaluate the adequacy of site emergency services. This includes all facets of the fire

64

Safety Bulletin 2011-01, Events Beyond Design Safety Basis Analysis |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Bulletin 2011-01, Events Beyond Design Safety Basis Analysis Bulletin 2011-01, Events Beyond Design Safety Basis Analysis Safety Bulletin 2011-01, Events Beyond Design Safety Basis Analysis PURPOSE This Safety Alert provides information on a safety concern related to the identification and mitigation of events that may fall outside those analyzed in the documented safety analysis. BACKGROUND On March 11 , 2011 , the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station in Japan was damaged by a magnitude 9.0 earthquake and the subsequent tsunami. While there is still a lot to be learned from the accident · about the adequacy of design specifications and the equipment failure modes, reports from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) have identified some key aspects of the operational emergency at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station.

65

Preliminary Analysis of the Jobs and Economic Impacts of Renewable Energy Projects Supported by the ..Section..1603 Treasury Grant Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This analysis responds to a request from the Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) to estimate the direct and indirect jobs and economic impacts of projects supported by the Section 1603 Treasury grant program. The analysis employs the Jobs and Economic Development Impacts (JEDI) models to estimate the gross jobs, earnings, and economic output supported by the construction and operation of the large wind (greater than 1 MW) and solar photovoltaic (PV) projects funded by the Section 1603 grant program.

Steinberg, D.; Porro, G.; Goldberg, M.

2012-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

66

Rankine bottoming cycle safety analysis. Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Vector Engineering Inc. conducted a safety and hazards analysis of three Rankine Bottoming Cycle Systems in public utility applications: a Thermo Electron system using Fluorinal-85 (a mixture of 85 mole % trifluoroethanol and 15 mole % water) as the working fluid; a Sundstrand system using toluene as the working fluid; and a Mechanical Technology system using steam and Freon-II as the working fluids. The properties of the working fluids considered are flammability, toxicity, and degradation, and the risks to both plant workers and the community at large are analyzed.

Lewandowski, G.A.

1980-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

67

Job Arrays  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

job submission, and easier job management. If you find yourself submitting thousands of jobs at a time that are largely identical, you should use job arrays. For example, if you...

68

242-A evaporator safety analysis report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report provides a revised safety analysis for the upgraded 242-A Evaporator (the Evaporator). This safety analysis report (SAR) supports the operation of the Evaporator following life extension upgrades and other facility and operations upgrades (e.g., Project B-534) that were undertaken to enhance the capabilities of the Evaporator. The Evaporator has been classified as a moderate-hazard facility (Johnson 1990). The information contained in this SAR is based on information provided by 242-A Evaporator Operations, Westinghouse Hanford Company, site maintenance and operations contractor from June 1987 to October 1996, and the existing operating contractor, Waste Management Hanford (WMH) policies. Where appropriate, a discussion address the US Department of Energy (DOE) Orders applicable to a topic is provided. Operation of the facility will be compared to the operating contractor procedures using appropriate audits and appraisals. The following subsections provide introductory and background information, including a general description of the Evaporator facility and process, a description of the scope of this SAR revision,a nd a description of the basic changes made to the original SAR.

CAMPBELL, T.A.

1999-05-17T23:59:59.000Z

69

Safety analysis of in-use vehicle wrapping cylinder  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The focus of this presentation is on the security analysis for wrapped cylinders used in vehicles and analyzing safety conditions and environmental effects through testing.

70

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences – April 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by the Electrical Safety Community for information exchange and continual learning.

71

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences – March 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by the Electrical Safety Community for information exchange and continual learning.

72

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences – August 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by the Electrical Safety Community for information exchange and continual learning.

73

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences – November 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by the Electrical Safety Community for information exchange and continual learning.

74

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences – June 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by the Electrical Safety Community for information exchange and continual learning.

75

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences – April 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by the Electrical Safety Community for information exchange and continual learning.

76

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences – December 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by the Electrical Safety Community for information exchange and continual learning.

77

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences – July 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by the Electrical Safety Community for information exchange and continual learning.

78

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences – August 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by the Electrical Safety Community for information exchange and continual learning.

79

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences – May 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by the Electrical Safety Community for information exchange and continual learning.

80

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences – October 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by the Electrical Safety Community for information exchange and continual learning.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "job safety analysis" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences – September 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by the Electrical Safety Community for information exchange and continual learning.

82

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences – October 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by the Electrical Safety Community for information exchange and continual learning.

83

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences – September 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by the Electrical Safety Community for information exchange and continual learning.

84

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences – February 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by the Electrical Safety Community for information exchange and continual learning.

85

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences – June 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by the Electrical Safety Community for information exchange and continual learning.

86

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences – May 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by the Electrical Safety Community for information exchange and continual learning.

87

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences – December 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by the Electrical Safety Community for information exchange and continual learning.

88

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences – August 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by the Electrical Safety Community for information exchange and continual learning.

89

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences – March 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by the Electrical Safety Community for information exchange and continual learning.

90

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences – July 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by the Electrical Safety Community for information exchange and continual learning.

91

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences – September 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by the Electrical Safety Community for information exchange and continual learning.

92

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences – January 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by the Electrical Safety Community for information exchange and continual learning.

93

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences – July 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by the Electrical Safety Community for information exchange and continual learning.

94

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences – June 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by the Electrical Safety Community for information exchange and continual learning.

95

Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences – January 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) reports that was requested by the Electrical Safety Community for information exchange and continual learning.

96

Comparison of Intergrated Safety Analysis (ISA) and Probabilistic...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 SUBJECT: COMPARISON OF INTEGRATED SAFETY ANALYSIS (ISA) AND PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT (PRA) FOR FUEL CYCLE FACILITIES Dear Chairman...

97

CRAD, Documented Safety Analysis Development- April 23, 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review of Documented Safety Analysis Development for the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (LBL Facilities) (HSS CRAD 45-58, Rev. 0)

98

Jobs | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

About Jobs Safety and Security Policy (SSP) SSP Home About Staff Organization Chart .pdf file (69KB) Jobs Frequently Used Resources Categorical Exclusion Determinations...

99

CRAD, Documented Safety Analysis Development - April 23, 2013 | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Documented Safety Analysis Development - April 23, 2013 Documented Safety Analysis Development - April 23, 2013 CRAD, Documented Safety Analysis Development - April 23, 2013 April 23, 2013 Review of Documented Safety Analysis Development for the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (LBL Facilities) (HSS CRAD 45-58, Rev. 0) The review will consider selected aspects of the development of the Documented Safety Analysis (DSA) for the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP); Low Activity Waste (LAW) facility, Balance of Facilities and Analytical Laboratory (LAB) (collectively identified as LBL) to assess the extent to which nuclear safety is integrated into the design of the LBL facilities in accordance with DOE directives; in particular, DOE Order 420. l B and DOE-STD-3009-94. The review will focus on a few selected

100

Volume II - Accident and Operational Safety Analysis Handbook  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

208-2012 208-2012 July 2012 DOE HANDBOOK Accident and Operational Safety Analysis Volume II: Operational Safety Analysis Techniques U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-HDBK-1208-2012 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Department of Energy (DOE) Accident and Operational Safety Analysis Handbook was prepared under the sponsorship of the DOE Office of Health Safety and Security (HSS), Office of Corporate Safety Programs, and the Energy Facility Contractors Operating Group (EFCOG), Industrial Hygiene and Safety Sub-group of the Environmental Health and Safety Working Group. The preparers would like to gratefully acknowledge the authors whose works are referenced in this document, and the individuals who provided valuable technical insights and/or specific

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "job safety analysis" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Checkpointing strategies for parallel jobs  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This work provides an analysis of checkpointing strategies for minimizing expected job execution times in an environment that is subject to processor failures. In the case of both sequential and parallel jobs, we give the optimal solution for exponentially ... Keywords: checkpointing, fault-tolerance, parallel job, sequential job

Marin Bougeret; Henri Casanova; Mikael Rabie; Yves Robert; Frédéric Vivien

2011-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

102

Safety Evaluation Report of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Contact Handled (CH) Waste Documented Safety Analysis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Safety Evaluation Report (SER) documents the Department of Energy’s (DOE's) review of Revision 9 of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Contact Handled (CH) Waste Documented Safety Analysis, DOE/WIPP-95-2065 (WIPP CH DSA), and provides the DOE Approval Authority with the basis for approving the document. It concludes that the safety basis documented in the WIPP CH DSA is comprehensive, correct, and commensurate with hazards associated with CH waste disposal operations. The WIPP CH DSA and associated technical safety requirements (TSRs) were developed in accordance with 10 CFR 830, Nuclear Safety Management, and DOE-STD-3009-94, Preparation Guide for U. S. Department of Energy Nonreactor Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports.

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2005-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

103

Comparison of Integrated Safety Analysis (ISA) and Probabilistic Risk  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Comparison of Integrated Safety Analysis (ISA) and Probabilistic Comparison of Integrated Safety Analysis (ISA) and Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) for Fuel Cycle Facilities, 2/17/11 Comparison of Integrated Safety Analysis (ISA) and Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) for Fuel Cycle Facilities, 2/17/11 During the 580th meeting of the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS), February 10-12, 2011, we reviewed the staff's white paper, "A Comparison of Integrated Safety Analysis and Probabilistic Risk Assessment." Our Radiation Protection and Nuclear Materials Subcommittee also reviewed this matter during a meeting on January 11, 2011. During these meetings we met with representatives of the NRC staff and the Nuclear Energy Institute. We also had the benefit of the documents referenced. Comparison of Intergrated Safety Analysis (ISA) and Probabilistic Risk

104

A Domain-Specific Safety Analysis for Digital Nuclear Plant Protection Systems  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Tree Analysis), FMEA (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis), HAZOP (Hazard and Operability study). · Safety

105

TA-55 Final Safety Analysis Report Comparison Document and DOE Safety Evaluation Report Requirements  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document provides an overview of changes to the currently approved TA-55 Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) that are included in the upgraded FSAR. The DOE Safety Evaluation Report (SER) requirements that are incorporated into the upgraded FSAR are briefly discussed to provide the starting point in the FSAR with respect to the SER requirements.

Alan Bond

2001-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

106

Running jobs on Euclid  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Running jobs Running jobs Running jobs Overview and Basic Description Euclid is a single node system with 48 processors. It supports both multiprocessing (MPI) and multithreading programming models. Interactive Jobs All Euclid jobs are interactive. To launch an MPI job, type in this at the shell prompt: % mpirun -np numprocs executable_name where numprocs is the total number of MPI processes that will be executed. Interactive Usage Policy Due to the dynamic and unpredictable nature of visualization and data analysis, NERSC will attempt to provide equitable access to Euclid's resources through the enforcement of certain usage guidelines. The most crucial resources are the processor cores (48) and memory (512 GB). Processor Core Usage Policy No single interactive job should use more than 12 processor cores. A single

107

Subject: Integrated Safety Analysis: Why It Is Appropriate for Fuel  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Subject: Integrated Safety Analysis: Why It Is Appropriate for Fuel Subject: Integrated Safety Analysis: Why It Is Appropriate for Fuel Recycling Facilities Project Number: 689Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Letter, 9/10/10 Subject: Integrated Safety Analysis: Why It Is Appropriate for Fuel Recycling Facilities Project Number: 689Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Letter, 9/10/10 Enclosed for your review is a Nuclear Energy Institute white paper on the use of Integrated Safety Analysis (ISA) at U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission-licensed recycling facilities. This paper is intended as an information source for the NRC and should serve as a foundation for discussion with industry representatives on the issue. This paper concludes that an ISA is a risk-informed, performance-based way of achieving and maintaining safety at fuel recycling facilities. As

108

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

S S A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z SAAR - Supervisor's Accident Analysis Report SAAR for Division Safety Coordinators Safety Concerns/Comments Safety Engineering (Division) Safety Committee Safety Advisory Committee (LBNL) Safety Coordinator and Liaison Resources Safety Flicks Safety Shoes Safety Walk Around Check List Safety Walk Around Check List for Managers Satellite Accumulation Areas Security call x5472 Security and Emergency Operations Shipping & Transporting Hazardous Materials Shoemobile (schedule) (form) Site Access (parking permits, gate passes, buses) Site Environmental Report Site Map SJHA Spot Award Program Stop Work Policy Stretch Break Software-RSIGuard Subcontractor Job Hazard Analysis

109

SNF fuel retrieval sub project safety analysis document  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This safety analysis is for the SNF Fuel Retrieval (FRS) Sub Project. The FRS equipment will be added to K West and K East Basins to facilitate retrieval, cleaning and repackaging the spent nuclear fuel into Multi-Canister Overpack baskets. The document includes a hazard evaluation, identifies bounding accidents, documents analyses of the accidents and establishes safety class or safety significant equipment to mitigate accidents as needed.

BERGMANN, D.W.

1999-02-24T23:59:59.000Z

110

Software FMEA analysis for safety-related application software  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract A method of a software safety analysis is described in this paper for safety-related application software. The target software system is a software code installed at an Automatic Test and Interface Processor (ATIP) in a digital reactor protection system (DRPS). For the ATIP software safety analysis, at first, an overall safety or hazard analysis is performed over the software architecture and modules, and then a detailed safety analysis based on the software FMEA (Failure Modes and Effect Analysis) method is applied to the ATIP program. For an efficient analysis, the software FMEA analysis is carried out based on the so-called failure-mode template extracted from the function blocks used in the function block diagram (FBD) for the ATIP software. The software safety analysis by the software FMEA analysis, being applied to the ATIP software code, which has been integrated and passed through a very rigorous system test procedure, is proven to be able to provide very valuable results (i.e., software defects) that could not be identified during various system tests.

Gee-Yong Park; Dong Hoon Kim; Dong Young Lee

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

111

Job satisfaction and job performance: is the relationship spurious?  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The link between job satisfaction and job performance is one of the most studied relationships in industrial/organizational psychology. Meta-analysis (Judge, Thoresen, Bono, & Patton, 2001) has estimated the magnitude of this relationship to be ?...

Cook, Allison Laura

2009-05-15T23:59:59.000Z

112

US ITER | Jobs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Postings Careers in Fusion Science ITER Jobs Home > Jobs > International Job Postings International ITER Postions International...

113

DOE-HDBK-1076-94; DOE Handbook Table-Top Job Analysis  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

76-94 76-94 December 1994 DOE HANDBOOK TABLE-TOP JOB ANALYSIS U.S. Department of Energy FSC 6910 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE95006860 DOE-HDBK-1076-94 iii FOREWORD The purpose of this Handbook is to establish general training program guidelines for training personnel in developing training for operation, maintenance, and technical support

114

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY and HEALTH  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

MARYLAND OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY and HEALTH ACT safety and health protection on the job STATE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS, AND OTHER APPLICABLE REGULATIONS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM Complaints about State Program administration may be made to Regional Administrator, Occupational Safety

Weaver, Harold A. "Hal"

115

Perception of Job Autonomy in the  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. A culture of safety includes many cognitive mindsets and interpersonal practices, one of which is job of the safety culture in two Johns Hopkins-affiliated ICU's were measured. Methods A series of validated surveys of a culture of safety, namely, job autonomy. Den Bos JV, Rustagi K, Gray T, Halford M, Ziemkiewicz E, Shreve J

Connor, Ed

116

A probabilistic safety analysis of incidents in nuclear research reactors  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......System for Research Reactor (IRSRR). Available...System for Research Reactor (IRSRR). Available...76. 7 Manual on reliability data collection for research reactor PSAs. (1992) IAEA...probabilistic safety analysis of incidents in nuclear......

Valdir Maciel Lopes; Gian Maria Agostinho Angelo Sordi; Mauricio Moralles; Tufic Madi Filho

2012-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

117

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS): JHA FAQ  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Job Hazards Analysis FAQ Job Hazards Analysis FAQ Topics JHA Basics Accessing the JHA Benefits of the JHA Work Lead JHA Work Groups Taking Your JHA Correcting Your JHA Training Profile JHA Basics Back to top Q: What is a JHA? A: The Job Hazards Analysis (JHA) process provides a documented mechanism to answer the question "How do I know that I'm doing my job safely?" It is a methodical analysis tool used by highly effective organizations to identify and eliminate workplace hazards before they can cause harm. Job Hazards Analysis is a tool used by LBNL to address the five core functions of Integrated Safety Management namely Plan the Work by identifying the tasks to be performed; Analyze the Hazards of the Work; Determine the Controls necessary to safely perform the Work; Perform the Work utilizing the prescribed Controls; and

118

Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Attachment, Integrated Safety Analysis |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Attachment, Integrated Safety Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Attachment, Integrated Safety Analysis Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Attachment, Integrated Safety Analysis This paper addresses why the use of an Integrated Safety Analysis ("ISA") is appropriate for fuel recycling facilities1 which would be licensed under new regulations currently being considered by NRC. The use of the ISA for fuel facilities under Part 70 is described and compared to the use of a Probabilistic Risk Assessment ("PRA") for reactor facilities. A basis is provided for concluding that future recycling facilities - which will possess characteristics similar to today's fuel cycle facilities and distinct from reactors - can best be assessed using established qualitative or semi-quantitative ISA techniques to achieve and

119

Careers, Jobs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Jobs careersassetsimagescareers-icon.jpg Careers, Jobs Explore the multiple dimensions of a career at Los Alamos Lab: work with the best minds on the planet in an inclusive...

120

Job Opportunities  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Job Opportunities Associate Director of Research, (Director of the Acclerator Group) Advertising Number: 0003112, Position Number: 012760, (pdf version)...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "job safety analysis" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Software safety analysis of function block diagrams using fault trees , Junbeom Yoob,*, Sungdeok Chab  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

requirements written in natural language and performing safety analysis techniques such as FMEA [5] and HAZOP

122

Safety analysis for Shippingport Station Decommissioning Project. Vol. 9. Pt. 1. Rev. 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Information is presented concerning the safety analysis for the decommissioning project; and permitting plan.

Not Available

1983-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

123

Safety analysis report for packaging (onsite) steel drum  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP) provides the analyses and evaluations necessary to demonstrate that the steel drum packaging system meets the transportation safety requirements of HNF-PRO-154, Responsibilities and Procedures for all Hazardous Material Shipments, for an onsite packaging containing Type B quantities of solid and liquid radioactive materials. The basic component of the steel drum packaging system is the 208 L (55-gal) steel drum.

McCormick, W.A.

1998-09-29T23:59:59.000Z

124

Monitoring Jobs on Carver  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Monitoring Jobs Monitoring Jobs Monitoring Jobs Overview Please see the man pages of the commands below for more options. The Job Information page has more information on current queue status, completed jobs, and job summary statistics. Command Description qsub batch_script Submit batch script to queue; returns job_id. qdel job_id Delete job from queue. qhold job_id Place job on hold in queue. qrls job_id Release held job. qalter Change attributes of submitted job. qmove new_queue job_id Move job to a different queue. qstat -a List jobs in submission order. qstat -f job_id Produce detailed report about job. qs List jobs in priority order. showq List jobs in priority order, categorized by job state. showstart job_id Produce estimate of start time for job. checkjob job_id Produce scheduling diagnostics for job.

125

A new DOE standard for transuranic waste nuclear safety analysis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The DOE Office of Environmental Management (EM) observed through onsite assessments and a review of site-specific lessons learned that transuranic (TRU) waste operations could benefit from standardization of assumptions and approaches used to analyze hazards and select controls. EM collected and compared safety analysis information from DOE sites, including a comparison of the type of TRU waste accidents evaluated and controls selected, as well as specific Airborne Release Fractions (ARFs), Respirable Fractions (RFs), and Damage Ratios (DRs) assumed in accident analyses. This paper recounts the efforts by the DOE and its contractors to bring consistency to the safety analysis process supporting TRU waste operations through an integrated re-engineering effort. EM embarked on a process to re-engineer and standardize TRU safety analysis activities complex-wide. The effort involved DOE headquarters, field offices, and contractors. Five teams were formed to analyze and develop the necessary technical basis for a DOE Technical Standard. The teams looked at general issues including Safety Basis (SB), drum integrity and inspection criteria, hazard controls and analysis, safety analysis review and approval process, and implementation of hazard controls. (authors)

Triay, I.; Chung, D. [U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C. (United States); Woody, J. [Atlas Consulting, Knoxville, TN (United States); Foppe, T. [Carlsbad Technical Assistance Contractor, Carlsbad, NM (United States); Mewhinney, C. [Sandia National Laboratories, Carlsbad, NM (United States); Jennings, S. [Los Alamos National Laboratories, Carlsbad, NM (United States)

2007-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

126

An analysis of job placement variables of foreign national Master of Business Administration (MBA) students  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

placement variables of international students graduating from MBA programs across the United States in the 2001 class. A thorough review of the literature summarized the adjustment challenges facing international students, career services, and the job search...

Scism, Darby Claire

2005-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

127

Interactive Jobs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Interactive Jobs Interactive Jobs Interactive Jobs Interactive Batch Jobs The login nodes on Genepool should not be used for heavy interactive work. These login nodes are shared amoungst all Genepool users so heavy CPU or memory usage will affect other Genepool users. 10 nodes have been reserved on Genepool for high priority and interactive work. Each user can use up to 2 slots at a time in the high priority queue. Use the qlogin command to run jobs interactively. The example below shows how to request an interactive session on Genepool . genepool:$~> qlogin -l high.c This will put you directly onto a node where you can do interactive work. kmfagnan@genepool01:~$ qlogin -l high.c Your job 1459021 ("QLOGIN") has been submitted waiting for interactive job to be scheduled ......

128

RISMC ADVANCED SAFETY ANALYSIS WORKING PLAN – FY 2015 – FY 2019  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

SUMMARY In this report, the Advanced Safety Analysis Program (ASAP) objectives and value proposition is described. ASAP focuses on modernization of nuclear power safety analysis (tools, methods and data); implementing state-of-the-art modeling techniques (which include, for example, enabling incorporation of more detailed physics as they become available); taking advantage of modern computing hardware; and combining probabilistic and mechanistic analyses to enable a risk informed safety analysis process. The modernized tools will maintain the current high level of safety in our nuclear power plant fleet, while providing an improved understanding of safety margins and the critical parameters that affect them. Thus, the set of tools will provide information to inform decisions on plant modifications, refurbishments, and surveillance programs, while improving economics. The set of tools will also benefit the design of new reactors, enhancing safety per unit cost of a nuclear plant. As part of the discussion, we have identified three sets of stakeholders, the nuclear industry, the Department of Energy (DOE), and associated oversight organizations. These three groups would benefit from ASAP in different ways. For example, within the DOE complex, the possible applications that are seen include the safety of experimental reactors, facility life extension, safety-by-design in future generation advanced reactors, and managing security for the storage of nuclear material. This report provides information in five areas: 1. A value proposition (“why is this important?”) that will make the case for stakeholder’s use of the ASAP research and development (R&D) products. 2. An identification of likely end users and pathway to adoption of enhanced tools by the end-users. 3. A proposed set of practical and achievable “use case” demonstrations. 4. A proposed plan to address ASAP verification and validation (V&V) needs. 5. A proposed schedule for the multi-year ASAP.

Ronaldo H. Szilard; Curtis L. Smith

2014-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

129

FAQS Qualification Card - Criticality Safety | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Criticality Safety Criticality Safety FAQS Qualification Card - Criticality Safety A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-CriticalitySafety.docx Description Criticality Safety Qualification Card More Documents & Publications FAQS Gap Analysis Qualification Card - Criticality Safety

130

System safety analysis of an autonomous mobile robot  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Analysis of the safety of operating and maintaining the Stored Waste Autonomous Mobile Inspector (SWAMI) II in a hazardous environment at the Fernald Environmental Management Project (FEMP) was completed. The SWAMI II is a version of a commercial robot, the HelpMate{trademark} robot produced by the Transitions Research Corporation, which is being updated to incorporate the systems required for inspecting mixed toxic chemical and radioactive waste drums at the FEMP. It also has modified obstacle detection and collision avoidance subsystems. The robot will autonomously travel down the aisles in storage warehouses to record images of containers and collect other data which are transmitted to an inspector at a remote computer terminal. A previous study showed the SWAMI II has economic feasibility. The SWAMI II will more accurately locate radioactive contamination than human inspectors. This thesis includes a System Safety Hazard Analysis and a quantitative Fault Tree Analysis (FTA). The objectives of the analyses are to prevent potentially serious events and to derive a comprehensive set of safety requirements from which the safety of the SWAMI II and other autonomous mobile robots can be evaluated. The Computer-Aided Fault Tree Analysis (CAFTA{copyright}) software is utilized for the FTA. The FTA shows that more than 99% of the safety risk occurs during maintenance, and that when the derived safety requirements are implemented the rate of serious events is reduced to below one event per million operating hours. Training and procedures in SWAMI II operation and maintenance provide an added safety margin. This study will promote the safe use of the SWAMI II and other autonomous mobile robots in the emerging technology of mobile robotic inspection.

Bartos, R.J.

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

131

Motorway Safety in Europe and Greece: A Comparative Analysis  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Motorways offer a high level of road safety as compared to other road types. In most EU member states, motorways represent a percentage of all primary and secondary roads varying between 1% and 12% (EU15). In Greece this figure has been significantly lower until 2004 and since then it has been sharply increased. Road safety levels have been also improved as a consequence of that. The paper provides a comparative analysis of motorway safety among Greece and the EU and furthermore among Greek motorways. To achieve this, it makes use of certain safety indicators such as fatality and accident rates. In addition, for the Greek motorways, it makes use of additional data which are available from the motorway operators’ data bases including incidents and their causes. Association of accidents to drivers’ behavior is sought where possible. Finally, a more in depth investigation takes place concerning accidents in the Greek motorways, mainly in the ATTICA TOLLWAY and in EGNATIA ODOS.

Dimitrios Papaioannou; Alexandros Kokkalis

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

132

FAQS Gap Analysis Qualification Card – Occupational Safety  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Functional Area Qualification Standard Gap Analysis Qualification Cards outline the differences between the last and latest version of the FAQ Standard.

133

Submitting Jobs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Submitting Jobs Submitting Jobs Submitting Jobs Submitting your job If you are submitting your job on Genepool or Phoebe you do NOT need to source any batch settings. The batch environment has been loaded into your path by default. If qsub is not working properly, check to make sure that the uge module is loaded: module load uge If you are submitting a job from an external submit host you need to source the appropriate settings.sh file for Genepool or Phoebe. source /opt/uge/genepool/uge/genepool/common/settings.sh qsub commands and options UGE (Univa Grid Engine) is the batch system used for Genepool/Phoebe. Action How to do it Comment Submit a job qsub script In UGE you need to submit a script, not an executable. Specify number of processors for a threaded job qsub -pe pe_slots 8 ... Request 8 cores on a single node for your job. Please specify as many processors as will be needed during your job.

134

Running Jobs Intermittently Slow  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Jobs Intermittently Slow Running Jobs Intermittently Slow October 2, 2014 (0 Comments) Symptom: User jobs are seeing intermittent slowness, jobs can run very slow in certain stages...

135

COMPARATIVE SAFETY ANALYSIS DAT! 16 June 1972  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

thermal battery prematurely". The trees were developed down to events that could not be further developed in the safe arm slide timer and battery timer designs. The analysis shows the new timers do not, in fact (rachet release) design against the new (direct drive) design for both safe arm timer and battery timer

Rathbun, Julie A.

136

FAQS Job Task Analyses - DOE AVIATION MANAGER (AvM)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MANAGER (AvM) - JOB TASK ANALYSIS MANAGER (AvM) - JOB TASK ANALYSIS Job Analysis Worksheet for Tasks DOE AVIATION MANAGER Task Source Importance Frequency A Establishes goals for the field aviation program based on the anticipated requirements as applicable to DOE/NNSA, the field element, and other DOE/NNSA organizations that may require aviation services. DOE O 440.2C, chng 1 5 1 B Implements DOE/NNSA aviation management and safety policy and establishes the field element's standards for the aviation program that will ensure an effective, safe, secure and cost-efficient operation in accordance with this Order. DOE O 440.2C, chng 1 5 2 C Develops the organization's Aviation Implementation Documents (AID) and annually reviews the AID to ensure that it is current. DOE O 440.2C, chng 1 5 1

137

Safety analysis report for packaging (onsite) multicanister overpack cask  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This safety analysis report for packaging (SARP) documents the safety of shipments of irradiated fuel elements in the MUlticanister Overpack (MCO) and MCO Cask for a highway route controlled quantity, Type B fissile package. This SARP evaluates the package during transfers of (1) water-filled MCOs from the K Basins to the Cold Vacuum Drying Facility (CVDF) and (2) sealed and cold vacuum dried MCOs from the CVDF in the 100 K Area to the Canister Storage Building in the 200 East Area.

Edwards, W.S.

1997-07-14T23:59:59.000Z

138

Fuel Storage Facility Final Safety Analysis Report. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Fuel Storage Facility (FSF) is an integral part of the Fast Flux Test Facility. Its purpose is to provide long-term storage (20-year design life) for spent fuel core elements used to provide the fast flux environment in FFTF, and for test fuel pins, components and subassemblies that have been irradiated in the fast flux environment. This Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) and its supporting documentation provides a complete description and safety evaluation of the site, the plant design, operations, and potential accidents.

Linderoth, C.E.

1984-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

139

CRAD, New Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analysis and Technical Safety Requirements- December 2, 2014 (EA CRAD 31-07, Rev. 0)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

New Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analysis and Technical Safety Requirements Criteria Review and Approach Document (EA CRAD 31-07, Rev. 0)

140

SCALE 6: Comprehensive Nuclear Safety Analysis Code System  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Version 6 of the Standardized Computer Analyses for Licensing Evaluation (SCALE) computer software system developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, released in February 2009, contains significant new capabilities and data for nuclear safety analysis and marks an important update for this software package, which is used worldwide. This paper highlights the capabilities of the SCALE system, including continuous-energy flux calculations for processing multigroup problem-dependent cross sections, ENDF/B-VII continuous-energy and multigroup nuclear cross-section data, continuous-energy Monte Carlo criticality safety calculations, Monte Carlo radiation shielding analyses with automated three-dimensional variance reduction techniques, one- and three-dimensional sensitivity and uncertainty analyses for criticality safety evaluations, two- and three-dimensional lattice physics depletion analyses, fast and accurate source terms and decay heat calculations, automated burnup credit analyses with loading curve search, and integrated three-dimensional criticality accident alarm system analyses using coupled Monte Carlo criticality and shielding calculations.

Bowman, Stephen M [ORNL

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "job safety analysis" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

US ITER | Jobs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Postings Careers in Fusion Science ITER Jobs Home > Jobs > US ITER Positions US ITER Positions US...

142

Evaluation of safety assessment methodologies in Rocky Flats Risk Assessment Guide (1985) and Building 707 Final Safety Analysis Report (1987)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

FSARs. Rockwell International, as operating contractor at the Rocky Flats plant, conducted a safety analysis program during the 1980s. That effort resulted in Final Safety Analysis Reports (FSARs) for several buildings, one of them being the Building 707 Final Safety Analysis Report, June 87 (707FSAR) and a Plant Safety Analysis Report. Rocky Flats Risk Assessment Guide, March 1985 (RFRAG85) documents the methodologies that were used for those FSARs. Resources available for preparation of those Rocky Flats FSARs were very limited. After addressing the more pressing safety issues, some of which are described below, the present contractor (EG&G) intends to conduct a program of upgrading the FSARs. This report presents the results of a review of the methodologies described in RFRAG85 and 707FSAR and contains suggestions that might be incorporated into the methodology for the FSAR upgrade effort.

Walsh, B.; Fisher, C.; Zigler, G.; Clark, R.A. [Science and Engineering Associates, Inc., Albuquerque, NM (United States)

1990-11-09T23:59:59.000Z

143

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Chemical Processing  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Chemical Processing FAQS Chemical Processing FAQS August 2010 STEP 1: Job Task Analysis for Tasks Task (and Number) Source Importance Frequency Critically analyze system design-basis documentation and related safety documentation to ensure application of the principle of safety in design as described in DOE O 413.3-1 (2006), Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets and associated guides. FAQS Duties and Responsibilities Paragraph A 3 2 Evaluate DOE facility and program-related chemical processes for safe and efficient process startup, operation, maintenance, and testing, including emergency systems. FAQS Duties and Responsibilities Paragraph D 5 4 Verify the application of quality assurance, configuration management, and safety requirements to chemical

144

US ITER | Jobs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

BUSINESS WITH US ITER | MEDIA CORNER | JOBS | CONTACT US US Job Postings International Job Postings Careers in Fusion Science ITER Jobs Home > US ITER Jobs Be a Part of...

145

Multifamily Retrofit Project Manager Job/Task Analysis and Report: September 2013  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The development of job/task analyses (JTAs) is one of three components of the Guidelines for Home Energy Professionals project and will allow industry to develop training resources, quality assurance protocols, accredited training programs, and professional certifications. The Multifamily Retrofit Project Manager JTA identifies and catalogs all of the tasks performed by multifamily retrofit project managers, as well as the knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) needed to perform the identified tasks.

Owens, C. M.

2013-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

146

Multifamily Energy Auditor Job/Task Analysis and Report: September 2013  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The development of job/task analyses (JTAs) is one of three components of the Guidelines for Home Energy Professionals project and will allow industry to develop training resources, quality assurance protocols, accredited training programs, and professional certifications. The Multifamily Energy Auditor JTA identifies and catalogs all of the tasks performed by multifamily energy auditors, as well as the knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) needed to perform the identified tasks.

Owens, C. M.

2013-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

147

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Confinement Ventillation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

For Expert, Working or Familiarity Level Competencies CVS/PGT FAQ Job Analysis Worksheet for Tasks Task Source Importance Frequency #1 Serves as SME D&R 5 4 #2 Reviews safety documentation D&R 4+ 3- #3 Participates in standards development and interpretation D&R 2 1 #4 Assesses contractor programs and implementation D&R 4 4 #5 Represents Site/DOE at CVS meetings/committees D&R 3 1 #6 Provides oversight of HEPA filter QA programs D&R 4 3+ #7 Evaluate designs D&R 4+ 2 #8 Maintain proficiency D&R 5 1 Importance Scale Frequency How important is this task to the job? How often is the task performed? 0 = Not Performed 0 = Not Performed 1 = Not Important 1 = Every few months to yearly 2 = Somewhat Important 2 = Every few weeks to monthly

148

Deconvolution of variability and uncertainty in the Cassini safety analysis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The standard method for propagation of uncertainty in a risk analysis requires rerunning the risk calculation numerous times with model parameters chosen from their uncertainty distributions. This was not practical for the Cassini nuclear safety analysis, due to the computationally intense nature of the risk calculation. A less computationally intense procedure was developed which requires only two calculations for each accident case. The first of these is the standard 'best-estimate' calculation. In the second calculation, variables and parameters change simultaneously. The mathematical technique of deconvolution is then used to separate out an uncertainty multiplier distribution, which can be used to calculate distribution functions at various levels of confidence.

Kampas, Frank J.; Loughin, Stephen [Lockheed Martin Missiles and Space, P.O. Box 8555, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 (United States); WAM Systems, 650 Loraine Street, Ardmore, Pennsylvania 19003 (United States)

1998-01-15T23:59:59.000Z

149

Safety analysis, 200 Area, Savannah River Plant: Separations area operations  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The nev HB-Line, located on the fifth and sixth levels of Building 221-H, is designed to replace the aging existing HB-Line production facility. The nev HB-Line consists of three separate facilities: the Scrap Recovery Facility, the Neptunium Oxide Facility, and the Plutonium Oxide Facility. There are three separate safety analyses for the nev HB-Line, one for each of the three facilities. These are issued as supplements to the 200-Area Safety Analysis (DPSTSA-200-10). These supplements are numbered as Sup 2A, Scrap Recovery Facility, Sup 2B, Neptunium Oxide Facility, Sup 2C, Plutonium Oxide Facility. The subject of this safety analysis, the, Plutonium Oxide Facility, will convert nitrate solutions of {sup 238}Pu to plutonium oxide (PuO{sub 2}) powder. All these new facilities incorporate improvements in: (1) engineered barriers to contain contamination, (2) barriers to minimize personnel exposure to airborne contamination, (3) shielding and remote operations to decrease radiation exposure, and (4) equipment and ventilation design to provide flexibility and improved process performance.

Perkins, W.C.; Lee, R.; Allen, P.M.; Gouge, A.P.

1991-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

150

EMPLOYEE SAFETY ORIENTATION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Page | 0 EMPLOYEE SAFETY ORIENTATION _________________ Risk, Safety & Security 3333 University Way to be acquainted with the safety program, welcome! Risk, Safety & Security at UNBC is dynamic. With more than 3 worksite and safe work procedures which pertain to your job. The role of the Risk and Safety Office

Bolch, Tobias

151

Safety Analysis of Requirements for a Product Family Robyn R. Lutz  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Safety Analysis of Requirements for a Product Family Robyn R. Lutz Iowa State University and Jet, destatez@collins.rockwell.com Abstract A safety analysis was performed on the software re- quirements for a family of ight instrumentation dis- plays of commercial aircraft. First, an existing Safety Checklist

Lutz, Robyn R.

152

Safety Analysis of Requirements for a Product Family Robyn R. Lutz \\Lambda  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Safety Analysis of Requirements for a Product Family Robyn R. Lutz \\Lambda Iowa State University and Communication srtockey, destatez@collins.rockwell.com Abstract A safety analysis was performed on the software, an existing Safety Checklist was extended to apply to four­variable models and used to analyze

Lutz, Robyn R.

153

Safety analysis of software product lines using state-based modeling q , Josh Dehlinger a  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Safety analysis of software product lines using state-based modeling q Jing Liu a , Josh Dehlinger of managing variations and their potential interactions across an entire product line currently hinders safety analysis in safety-critical, software product lines. The work described here contributes to a solution

Lutz, Robyn R.

154

Running Large Scale Jobs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Running Large Scale Jobs Running Large Scale Jobs Users face various challenges with running and scaling large scale jobs on peta-scale production systems. For example, certain...

155

Running Jobs on Hopper  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Queues and Policies Monitoring Jobs Using OpenMP with MPI Memory Considerations Runtime Tuning Options Running Large Scale Jobs Trouble Shooting and Error Messages Completed Jobs...

156

Mixed Waste Management Facility Preliminary Safety Analysis Report. Chapters 1 to 20  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document provides information on waste management practices, occupational safety, and a site characterization of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. A facility description, safety engineering analysis, mixed waste processing techniques, and auxiliary support systems are included.

Not Available

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

157

A probabilistic safety analysis of incidents in nuclear research reactors  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......errors, computational models (software), management, communication, safety culture, plant ageing, maintenance...Energy Power Plants Probability Radiation Monitoring Radiation Protection Radioactive Hazard Release Safety Management...

Valdir Maciel Lopes; Gian Maria Agostinho Angelo Sordi; Mauricio Moralles; Tufic Madi Filho

2012-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

158

DOE's Approach to Nuclear Facility Safety Analysis and Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presenter: Dr. James O'Brien, Director, Office of Nuclear Safety, Office of Health, Safety and Security, US Department of Energy

159

The Zion integrated safety analysis for NUREG-1150  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The utility-funded Zion Probabilistic Safety Study provided not only a detailed and thorough assessment of the risk profile of Zion Unit 1, but also presented substantial advancement in the technology of probabilistic risk assessment (PRA). Since performance of that study, modifications of plant hardware, the introduction of new emergency procedures, operational experience gained, information generated by severe accident research programs and further evolution of PRA and uncertainty analysis methods have provided a basis for reevaluation of the Zion risk profile. This reevaluation is discussed in this report. 5 refs.

Unwin, S.D.; Park, C.K.

1988-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

160

Fast Flux Test Facility final safety analysis report. Amendment 73  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report provides Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) Amendment 73 for incorporation into the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTR) FSAR set. This page change incorporates Engineering Change Notices (ECNs) issued subsequent to Amendment 72 and approved for incorparoration before May 6, 1993. These changes include: Chapter 3, design criteria structures, equipment, and systems; chapter 5B, reactor coolant system; chapter 7, instrumentation and control systems; chapter 9, auxiliary systems; chapter 11, reactor refueling system; chapter 12, radiation protection and waste management; chapter 13, conduct of operations; chapter 17, technical specifications; chapter 20, FFTF criticality specifications; appendix C, local fuel failure events; and appendix Fl, operation at 680{degrees}F inlet temperature.

Gantt, D.A.

1993-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "job safety analysis" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Monitoring your job  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Jobs Monitoring and Managing Jobs Monitoring and Managing Batch Jobs These are some basic commands for monitoring and modifiying batch jobs while they're queued or running. NERSC...

162

PDSF Job Efficiency  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Optimization Running Jobs Efficiently Running Jobs Efficiently Job Efficiency A job's efficiency is the ratio of its CPU time to the actual time it took to run, i.e., cputime ...

163

PHYSICS AND SAFETY ANALYSIS FOR THE NIST RESEARCH REACTOR.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Detailed reactor physics and safety analyses have been performed for the 20 MW D{sub 2}O moderated research reactor (NBSR) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The analyses provide an update to the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) and employ state-of-the-art calculational methods. Three-dimensional Monte Carlo neutron and photon transport calculations were performed with the MCNP code to determine the safety parameters for the NBSR. The core depletion and determination of the fuel compositions were performed with MONTEBURNS. MCNP calculations were performed to determine the beginning, middle, and end-of-cycle power distributions, moderator temperature coefficient, and shim safety arm, beam tube and void reactivity worths. The calculational model included a plate-by-plate description of each fuel assembly, axial mid-plane water gap, beam tubes and the tubular geometry of the shim safety arms. The time-dependent analysis of the primary loop was determined with a RELAP5 transient analysis model that includes the pump, heat exchanger, fuel element geometry, and flow channels for both the six inner and twenty-four outer fuel elements. The statistical analysis used to assure protection from critical heat flux (CHF) was performed using a Monte Carlo simulation of the uncertainties contributing to the CHF calculation. The power distributions used to determine the local fuel conditions and margin to CHF were determined with MCNP. Evaluations were performed for the following accidents: (1) the control rod withdrawal startup accident, (2) the maximum reactivity insertion accident, (3) loss-of-flow resulting from loss of electrical power, (4) loss-of-flow resulting from a primary pump seizure, (5) loss-of-flow resulting from inadvertent throttling of a flow control valve, (6) loss-of-flow resulting from failure of both shutdown cooling pumps and (7) misloading of a fuel element. In both the startup and maximum reactivity insertion accidents, the core power transient is terminated by a reactor trip at 26 MW. The calculations show that both the peak reactor power and the excursion energy depend on the negative reactivity insertion from reactor trip. In one of the loss-of-flow accidents offsite electrical power is assumed lost to the three operating primary pumps. A slightly delayed reactor scram is initiated as a result of primary flow coast down. The RELAP5 results indicate that there is adequate margin to CHF and no damage to the fuel will occur, because of the momentum of the coolant flowing through the fuel channels and the negative scram reactivity insertion. For both the primary pump seizure and inadvertent throttling of a flow control valve, the RELAP5 analyses indicate that the reduction in power following the trip is sufficient to ensure that there is adequate margin to CHF and that the fuel cladding does not fail. The analysis of the loss-of-flow accident in the extremely unlikely case where both shutdown pumps fail, shows that the cooling provided by the D{sub 2}O is sufficient to ensure the cladding does not fail. The power distributions were examined for a set of fuel misloadings in which a fresh fuel element is moved from a peripheral low-reactivity location to a central high-reactivity location. The calculations show that there is adequate margin to CHF and the cladding does not fail. An additional analysis was performed to simulate the operation at low power (500 kW) without forced flow cooling. The result indicates that natural convection cooling is adequate for operation of the NBSR at a power level of 500 kW.

CHENG,L.HANSON,A.DIAMOND,D.XU,J.CAREW,J.RORER,D.

2004-03-31T23:59:59.000Z

164

EIA: Jobs  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Jobs at the Energy Information Administration en-us Sun, Jobs at the Energy Information Administration en-us Sun, 22 Dec 2013 12:01:24 EST EIA logo http://www.eia.gov/global/images/logos/eia_logo_250.png http://www.eia.gov/ US Energy Information Administration Survey Statistician - GS-1530-13 https://www.usajobs.gov/getjob/viewdetails/353781300 Sun, 22 Dec 2013 12:01:24 EST Announcement Number: DOE-HQ-EI-13-00519-MPClosing Date: 12 November 2013 Supervisory Survey Statistician - GS-1530-15 https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/349986100 Sun, 22 Dec 2013 12:01:24 EST Announcement Number: DOE-HQ-EI-13-504-MPClosing Date: 04 September 2013 Supervisory Survey Statistician - GS-1530-15 https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/349986400 Sun, 22 Dec 2013 12:01:24 EST Announcement Number: DOE-HQ-EI-13-504-CRClosing Date: 04

165

New enhancements to SCALE for criticality safety analysis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

As the speed, available memory, and reliability of computer hardware increases and the cost decreases, the complexity and usability of computer software will increase, taking advantage of the new hardware capabilities. Computer programs today must be more flexible and user friendly than those of the past. Within available resources, the SCALE staff at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is committed to upgrading its computer codes to keep pace with the current level of technology. This paper examines recent additions and enhancements to the criticality safety analysis sections of the SCALE code package. These recent additions and enhancements made to SCALE can be divided into nine categories: (1) new analytical computer codes, (2) new cross-section libraries, (3) new criticality search sequences, (4) enhanced graphical capabilities, (5) additional KENO enhancements, (6) enhanced resonance processing capabilities, (7) enhanced material information processing capabilities, (8) portability of the SCALE code package, and (9) other minor enhancements, modifications, and corrections to SCALE. Each of these additions and enhancements to the criticality safety analysis capabilities of the SCALE code system are discussed below.

Hollenbach, D.F.; Bowman, S.M.; Petrie, L.M.; Parks, C.V. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States). Computational Physics and Engineering Div.

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

166

Deconvolution of variability and uncertainty in the Cassini safety analysis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The standard method for propagation of uncertainty in a risk analysis requires rerunning the risk calculation numerous times with model parameters chosen from their uncertainty distributions. This was not practical for the Cassini nuclear safety analysis, due to the computationally intense nature of the risk calculation. A less computationally intense procedure was developed which requires only two calculations for each accident case. The first of these is the standard {open_quotes}best-estimate{close_quotes} calculation. In the second calculation, variables and parameters change simultaneously. The mathematical technique of deconvolution is then used to separate out an uncertainty multiplier distribution, which can be used to calculate distribution functions at various levels of confidence. {copyright} {ital 1998 American Institute of Physics.}

Kampas, F.J. [Lockheed Martin Missiles and Space, P.O. Box 8555, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 (United States); Loughin, S. [WAM Systems, 650 Loraine Street, Ardmore, Pennsylvania 19003 (United States)

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

167

DNFSB 2002-1 Software Quality Assurance Improvement Plan Commitment 4.2.1.2: Safety Quality Assurance Plan and Criteria for the Safety Analysis Toolbox Codes  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-Criteria 2-Criteria Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2002-1 Software Quality Assurance Improvement Plan Commitment 4.2.1.2: Software Quality Assurance Plan and Criteria for the Safety Analysis Toolbox Codes U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environment, Safety and Health 1000 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20585-2040 November 2003 Software Quality Assurance Criteria for Safety Analysis Codes November 2003 INTENTIONALLY BLANK ii Software Quality Assurance Criteria for Safety Analysis Codes November 2003 FOREWORD This document discusses the Software Quality Assurance plan, and criteria and implementation procedures to be used to evaluate designated, safety-related computer software for the

168

Software Approach to Hazard Detection Using On-line Analysis of Safety Constraints  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Software Approach to Hazard Detection Using On-line Analysis of Safety Constraints Beth Schroedey. The research here addresses the problem of enhancing software safety through hazard detection. The premise.gatech.edu Abstract Hazard situations in safety-critical systems are typically complex, so there is a need for means

Plale, Beth

169

Canister storage building (CSB) safety analysis report phase 3: Safety analysis documentation supporting CSB construction  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Canister Storage Building (CSB) will be constructed in the 200 East Area of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hanford Site. The CSB will be used to stage and store spent nuclear fuel (SNF) removed from the Hanford Site K Basins. The objective of this chapter is to describe the characteristics of the site on which the CSB will be located. This description will support the hazard analysis and accident analyses in Chapter 3.0. The purpose of this report is to provide an evaluation of the CSB design criteria, the design's compliance with the applicable criteria, and the basis for authorization to proceed with construction of the CSB.

Garvin, L.J.

1997-04-28T23:59:59.000Z

170

A Conceptual Framework for Semantic Case-based Safety Analysis Olawande Daramola, Tor Stlhane  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

.biffl}@tuwien.ac.at Abstract Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) Analysis and Fail- ure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) are among-based framework for safety analy- sis, which facilitates the reuse of previous HAZOP and FMEA experiences in order application. Key words: Safety analysis, HAZOP, FMEA, ontology, requirements, case-based reasoning, natural

171

CRAD, Preliminary Documented Safety Analysis- July 25, 2014 (IEA CRAD 31-2, REV. 0)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This Criteria Review and Approach Document (IEA CRAD 31-2, REV. 0) provides objectives, criteria, and approaches for reviewing Nuclear Facility Preliminary Documented Safety Analysis.

172

Object Oriented Safety Analysis of an Extra High Voltage Substation Bay  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Experiences of application of the object oriented approach to safety analysis of an extra high voltage substation bay are presented. As the first step...

Bartosz Nowicki; Janusz Górski

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

173

Automation of System Safety Analysis: Possibilities and Pitfalls Andrew Galloway, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD UK  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

evolved to support safety analysis work (in this paper, we use the term "safety analysis" to encompass all, safety engineers may only achieve closure at the end of a system's working life, when it is possibleAutomation of System Safety Analysis: Possibilities and Pitfalls Andrew Galloway, University

Pumfrey, David

174

Hazard screening application guide. Safety Analysis Report Update Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The basic purpose of hazard screening is to group precesses, facilities, and proposed modifications according to the magnitude of their hazards so as to determine the need for and extent of follow on safety analysis. A hazard is defined as a material, energy source, or operation that has the potential to cause injury or illness in human beings. The purpose of this document is to give guidance and provide standard methods for performing hazard screening. Hazard screening is applied to new and existing facilities and processes as well as to proposed modifications to existing facilities and processes. The hazard screening process evaluates an identified hazards in terms of the effects on people, both on-site and off-site. The process uses bounding analyses with no credit given for mitigation of an accident with the exception of certain containers meeting DOT specifications. The process is restricted to human safety issues only. Environmental effects are addressed by the environmental program. Interfaces with environmental organizations will be established in order to share information.

none,

1992-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

175

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Safeguards and Security General Technical Base  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

for Safeguards ad Security General Technical Base FAQS for Safeguards ad Security General Technical Base FAQS August 2012 STEP 1: Job Task Analysis Worksheet for Tasks Task Source Importance Frequency #1 Understand the relationship of law (Federal and State), regulations and Departmental Directives S&S GTB FAQ 4 4 #2 Understand basic nuclear fundamentals S&S GTB FAQ 2 2 #3 Understand basic Environmental hazards, environmental laws, regulations and Departmental Directives S&S GTB FAQ 2 2 #4 Understand Safety/Health/Quality Requirements, Laws, Management Systems and Worker Safety Departmental Directives S&S GTB FAQ 2 2 #5 Understand CONOPS and Emergency Management System laws, regulations and Departmental Directives S&S GTB FAQ 3 1 #6 Understand facility safety and safety, design

176

Monitoring Jobs on Hopper  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Monitoring Jobs Monitoring Jobs Monitoring Jobs Monitoring Hopper Batch Jobs See the man pages for more options. The Job Information page has more information on current queue status, completed jobs, ALPS logs and job summary statistics. Job Commands Command Description qsub batch_script Submits batch script to the queue. The output of qsub will be a jobid qdel jobid Deletes a job from the queue qhold jobid Puts a job on hold in the queue. To delete a job from the hopper xfer queue users must add an additional parameter @hopper06 Example:6004861.hopper06@hopper06 qrls jobid Releases a job from hold. qalter [options] jobid Change attributes of submitted job. (See below.) qmove new_queue jobid Move job to new queue. Remember, the new queue must be one of the submission queues (premium, regular, or low)

177

Planning Document for an NBSR Conversion Safety Analysis Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The NIST Center for Neutron Research (NCNR) is a reactor-laboratory complex providing the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the nation with a world-class facility for the performance of neutron-based research. The heart of this facility is the National Bureau of Standards Reactor (NBSR). The NBSR is a heavy water moderated and cooled reactor operating at 20 MW. It is fueled with high-enriched uranium (HEU) fuel elements. A Global Threat Reduction Initiative (GTRI) program is underway to convert the reactor to low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel. This program includes the qualification of the proposed fuel, uranium and molybdenum alloy foil clad in an aluminum alloy, and the development of the fabrication techniques. This report is a planning document for the conversion Safety Analysis Report (SAR) that would be submitted to, and approved by, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) before the reactor could be converted.This report follows the recommended format and content from the NRC codified in NUREG-1537, “Guidelines for Preparing and Reviewing Applications for the Licensing of Non-power Reactors,” Chapter 18, “Highly Enriched to Low-Enriched Uranium Conversions.” The emphasis herein is on the SAR chapters that require significant changes as a result of conversion, primarily Chapter 4, Reactor Description, and Chapter 13, Safety Analysis. The document provides information on the proposed design for the LEU fuel elements and identifies what information is still missing. This document is intended to assist ongoing fuel development efforts, and to provide a platform for the development of the final conversion SAR. This report contributes directly to the reactor conversion pillar of the GTRI program, but also acts as a boundary condition for the fuel development and fuel fabrication pillars.

Diamond D. J.; Baek J.; Hanson, A.L.; Cheng, L-Y.; Brown, N.; Cuadra, A.

2013-09-25T23:59:59.000Z

178

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: DOE Launches JOBS and Economic Impacts of  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE Launches JOBS and DOE Launches JOBS and Economic Impacts of Fuel Cells (JOBS FC) Analysis Model (Text Version) to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: DOE Launches JOBS and Economic Impacts of Fuel Cells (JOBS FC) Analysis Model (Text Version) on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: DOE Launches JOBS and Economic Impacts of Fuel Cells (JOBS FC) Analysis Model (Text Version) on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: DOE Launches JOBS and Economic Impacts of Fuel Cells (JOBS FC) Analysis Model (Text Version) on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: DOE Launches JOBS and Economic Impacts of Fuel Cells (JOBS FC) Analysis Model (Text Version) on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: DOE Launches JOBS and Economic Impacts of Fuel Cells (JOBS FC) Analysis Model (Text Version) on Digg

179

Fault tree synthesis for software design analysis of PLC based safety-critical systems  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

As a software verification and validation should be performed for the development of PLC based safety-critical systems, a software safety analysis is also considered in line with entire software life cycle. In this paper, we propose a technique of software safety analysis in the design phase. Among various software hazard analysis techniques, fault tree analysis is most widely used for the safety analysis of nuclear power plant systems. Fault tree analysis also has the most intuitive notation and makes both qualitative and quantitative analyses possible. To analyze the design phase more effectively, we propose a technique of fault tree synthesis, along with a universal fault tree template for the architecture modules of nuclear software. Consequently, we can analyze the safety of software on the basis of fault tree synthesis. (authors)

Koo, S. R.; Cho, C. H. [Corporate R and D Inst., Doosan Heavy Industries and Construction Co., Ltd., 39-3, Seongbok-Dong, Yongin-Si, Gyeonggi-Do 449-795 (Korea, Republic of); Seong, P. H. [Dept. of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Korea Advanced Inst. of Science and Technology, 373-3 Guseong-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-701 (Korea, Republic of)

2006-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

180

PHYSICS AND SAFETY ANALYSIS FOR THE NIST RESEARCH REACTOR.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Detailed reactor physics and safety analyses have been performed for the 20 MW D{sub 2}O moderated research reactor (NBSR) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The analyses provide an update to the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) and employ state-of-the-art calculational methods. Three-dimensional MCNP Monte Carlo neutron and photon transport calculations were performed to determine the safety parameters for the NBSR. The core depletion and determination of the fuel compositions were performed with MONTEBURNS. MCNP calculations were performed to determine the beginning, middle, and end-of-cycle power distributions, moderator temperature coefficient, and shim arm, beam tube and void reactivity worths. The calculational model included a plate-by-plate description of each fuel assembly, axial mid-plane water gap, beam tubes and the tubular geometry of the shim arms. The time-dependent analysis of the primary loop was determined with a RELAP5 transient analysis model including the pump, heat exchanger, fuel element geometry, and flow channels for both the six inner and twenty-four outer fuel elements. The statistical analysis used to assure protection from critical heat flux (CHF) was performed using a Monte Carlo simulation of the uncertainties contributing to the CHF calculation. The power distributions used to determine the local fuel conditions and margin to CHF were determined with MCNP. Evaluations were performed for the following accidents: (1) the control rod withdrawal startup accident, (2) the maximum reactivity insertion accident, (3) loss-of-flow resulting from loss of electrical power, (4) loss-of-flow resulting from a primary pump seizure, (5) loss-of-flow resulting from inadvertent throttling of a flow control valve, (6) loss-of-flow resulting from failure of both shutdown cooling pumps and (7) misloading of a fuel element. In both the startup and maximum reactivity insertion accidents, the core power transient is terminated by a reactor trip at 30 MW. The calculations show that both the peak reactor power and the excursion energy depend on the negative reactivity insertion from reactor trip. Two cases were considered for loss of electrical power. In the first case offsite power is lost, resulting in an immediate scram caused by loss of power to the control rod system. In the second case power is lost to only the three operating primary pumps, resulting in a slightly delayed scram when loss-of-flow is detected as the pumps coast down. In both instances, RELAP5 results indicate that there is adequate margin to CHF and no damage to the fuel will occur, because of the momentum of the coolant flowing through the fuel channels and the negative scram reactivity insertion. For both the primary pump seizure and inadvertent throttling of a flow control valve, the RELAP5 analyses indicate that the reduction in power following the trip is sufficient to ensure that there is adequate margin to CHF and the fuel cladding does not fail. The analysis of the loss-of-flow accident in the extremely unlikely case where both shutdown pumps fail shows that the cooling provided by the D{sub 2}O is sufficient to ensure the cladding does not fail. The power distributions were examined for a set of fuel misloadings in which a fresh fuel element is moved from a peripheral low-reactivity location to a central high-reactivity location. The calculations show that there is adequate margin to CHF and the cladding does not fail.

CAREW,J.CHENG,L.HANSON,AXU,J.RORER,D.DIAMOND,D.

2003-08-26T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "job safety analysis" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Running Jobs on Franklin  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

jobs jobs Running jobs Job Launch Overview Parallel applications can not run on the login nodes. They must be launched onto the compute nodes via the aprun command. Read More » Interactive Jobs Interactive jobs may be run on Franklin by requesting resources from the batch system. "qsub -I -V -q interactive -lmppwidth=[num_cores]" is the basic command to request interactive resources. Read More » Submitting Batch Jobs Basic batch scripts, torque keywords. Sample scripts for advanced work flows: running multiple jobs, MPMD jobs, job dependencies. Read More » Queues and Policies Queue configuration and limits, policies and tips for getting your job through the queue faster. Read More » Monitoring Jobs Once a job is submitted it can be monitored, held, deleted and in some

182

Monitoring Jobs on Hopper  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Monitoring Jobs Monitoring Jobs Monitoring Jobs Monitoring Edison Batch Jobs The batch system provides the command to monotor your jobs. We are listing the commands commonly used to submit and monitor the jobs. For more informaiton please refer to the man pages of these commands. Job Commands Command Description qsub batch_script Submits batch script to the queue. The output of qsub will be a jobid qdel jobid Deletes a job from the queue qhold jobid Puts a job on hold in the queue. qrls jobid Releases a job from hold. qalter [options] jobid Change attributes of submitted job. (See below.) qmove new_queue jobid Move job to new queue. Remember, the new queue must be one of the submission queues (premium, regular, or low) qstat -a Lists jobs in submission order (more useful than qstat without options) Also takes -u and -f [jobid]> options

183

OF-FMEA: an approach to safety analysis of object-oriented software intensive systems  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The paper presents an extension to the common FMEA method in such a way that it can be applied to safety analysis of systems (hardware and software) that are developed using a recently popular object oriented approach. The method makes use of the object ... Keywords: FMEA, formal analysis, safety critical systems

Tadeusz Cichocki; Janusz Górski

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

184

Jobs | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Jobs Jobs We offer an unequalled variety of opportunities for individuals in a wide range of professional disciplines: from science and engineering to business and program analysis. Only here will you have access to unlimited career opportunities that impact these issues, while serving your country and enjoying the benefits of a career with the Federal Government. We offer an unequalled variety of opportunities for individuals in a wide range of professional disciplines: from science and engineering to business and program analysis. Only here will you have access to unlimited career opportunities that impact these issues, while serving your country and enjoying the benefits of a career with the Federal Government. Mobile Recruiting Upcoming Events 2014 American Meteorological Society Career Fair

185

Off-the-Job Injuries are on the Rise- and Costly  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Do you have an off-the-job safety program? Should you? The findings from a National Safety Council survey suggest that off-the-job injuries cost companies and society in general as much, if not more than on-the-job injuries!

186

Processing Exemptions to Nuclear Safety Rules and Approval of Alternative Methods for Documented Safety Analysis  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

STD-1083-2009 STD-1083-2009 June 2009 DOE STANDARD PROCESSING EXEMPTIONS TO NUCLEAR SAFETY RULES AND APPROVAL OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS FOR DOCUMENTED SAFETY ANALYSES U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Page at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds DOE-STD-1083-2009 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) Standard has been prepared by the Office of Quality Assurance Policy and Assistance to provide acceptable processes for: a. requesting and granting exemptions to DOE nuclear safety rules and b. requesting and approving alternate methodologies for documented safety analyses

187

Packaging Review Guide for Reviewing Safety Analysis Reports for Packagings  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Packaging Review Guide (PRG) provides guidance for Department of Energy (DOE) review and approval of packagings to transport fissile and Type B quantities of radioactive material. It fulfills, in part, the requirements of DOE Order 460.1B for the Headquarters Certifying Official to establish standards and to provide guidance for the preparation of Safety Analysis Reports for Packagings (SARPs). This PRG is intended for use by the Headquarters Certifying Official and his or her review staff, DOE Secretarial offices, operations/field offices, and applicants for DOE packaging approval. This PRG is generally organized at the section level in a format similar to that recommended in Regulatory Guide 7.9 (RG 7.9). One notable exception is the addition of Section 9 (Quality Assurance), which is not included as a separate chapter in RG 7.9. Within each section, this PRG addresses the technical and regulatory bases for the review, the manner in which the review is accomplished, and findings that are generally applicable for a package that meets the approval standards. This Packaging Review Guide (PRG) provides guidance for DOE review and approval of packagings to transport fissile and Type B quantities of radioactive material. It fulfills, in part, the requirements of DOE O 460.1B for the Headquarters Certifying Official to establish standards and to provide guidance for the preparation of Safety Analysis Reports for Packagings (SARPs). This PRG is intended for use by the Headquarters Certifying Official and his review staff, DOE Secretarial offices, operations/field offices, and applicants for DOE packaging approval. The primary objectives of this PRG are to: (1) Summarize the regulatory requirements for package approval; (2) Describe the technical review procedures by which DOE determines that these requirements have been satisfied; (3) Establish and maintain the quality and uniformity of reviews; (4) Define the base from which to evaluate proposed changes in scope and requirements of reviews; and (5) Provide the above information to DOE organizations, contractors, other government agencies, and interested members of the general public. This PRG was originally published in September 1987. Revision 1, issued in October 1988, added new review sections on quality assurance and penetrations through the containment boundary, along with a few other items. Revision 2 was published October 1999. Revision 3 of this PRG is a complete update, and supersedes Revision 2 in its entirety.

DiSabatino, A; Biswas, D; DeMicco, M; Fisher, L E; Hafner, R; Haslam, J; Mok, G; Patel, C; Russell, E

2007-04-12T23:59:59.000Z

188

Monitoring jobs with qs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Jobs Monitoring jobs with qs Monitoring jobs with qs qs is an alternative tool to the SGE-provided qstat for querying the queue status developed at NERSC. qs provides an...

189

A risk-informed approach to safety margins analysis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Risk Informed Safety Margins Characterization (RISMC) Pathway is a systematic approach developed to characterize and quantify safety margins of nuclear power plant structures, systems and components. The model has been tested on the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Lab.

Curtis Smith; Diego Mandelli

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

190

Running jobs on Euclid  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Running jobs Running jobs Overview and Basic Description Euclid is a single node system with 48 processors. It supports both multiprocessing (MPI) and multithreading programming...

191

Bioindustry Creates Green Jobs  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Bioindustry Creates Green Jobs Energy from abundant, renewable, domestic biomass can reduce U.S. dependence on oil, lower impacts on climate, and stimulate jobs and eco- nomic...

192

JOB NUMBER  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

. . . . . . . . . .: LEAVE BLANK (NARA use only) JOB NUMBER N/-&*W- 9d - 3 DATE RECEIVED " -1s - 9 J - NOTIFICATION TOAGENCY , In accordance with the provisions of 44 U.S.C. 3303a the disposition request. including amendments, is ap roved except , . l for items that may be marke,, ,"dis osition not approved" or "withdrawn in c o i m n 10. 4. NAME OF PERSON WITH WHOM TO CONFER 5 TELEPHONE Jannie Kindred (202) 5&-333 5 - 2 -96 6 AGENCYCERTIFICATION -. ~ - I hereby certify that I am authorized to act for this agency in matters pertaining to the disposition of its records and that the records roposed for disposal are not now needed for the business of this agency or wiRnot be needed after t G t r & s s d ; and that written concurrence from

193

Safety First Safety Last Safety Always Construction employers are required to provide medical  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Safety First Safety Last Safety Always Construction employers are required to provide medical at Construction Job Sites Safety Tip #7 Falling objects can be brutal if you don't protect your noodle. #12;Additional Information for Presenters Review the information provided on the reverse side of this safety tip

Minnesota, University of

194

Safety First Safety Last Safety Always Inspect rigging equipment for material handling before use  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Safety First Safety Last Safety Always Inspect rigging equipment for material handling before use. Rigging Equipment for Material Handling Safety Tip #19 At your job or at the plate, you can't get home on the reverse side of this safety tip sheet. Please refrain from reading the information verbatim

Minnesota, University of

195

Running Grid Jobs at NERSC  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Running Grid Jobs Running Grid Jobs | Tags: Grid How to submit a grid job to NERSC The following NERSC resources support job submission via Grid interfaces. Remote job submission...

196

A path analysis of relationships among job stress, job satisfaction, motivation to transfer, and transfer of learning: perceptions of occupational safety and health administration outreach trainers  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Committee Members, Linda L. Putnam R. Anthony Rolle Head of Department, Jim Scheurich May 2007 Major Subject: Educational Human Resource Development iii ABSTRACT A... contributed greatly to the successful completion of my dissertation. I would also like to thank Dr. Jim Scheurich, Head of the Department of Educational Administration and Human Resource Development. Dr. Scheurich?s leadership has surely benefited students...

Nair, Prakash Krishnan

2009-05-15T23:59:59.000Z

197

Hanford Sludge Treatment Project 105-KW Final Safety Analysis Report Review, August 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Site Visit Report Site Visit Report Sludge Treatment Project 105-KW Final Safety Analysis Report Review May 2011 August 2011 Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 4.0 Results .................................................................................................................................................... 2

198

Hanford Sludge Treatment Project 105-KW Final Safety Analysis Report Review, August 2011  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Site Visit Report Site Visit Report Sludge Treatment Project 105-KW Final Safety Analysis Report Review May 2011 August 2011 Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 4.0 Results .................................................................................................................................................... 2

199

Multi-Experts Analytic Hierarchy Process for the Sensitivity Analysis of Passive Safety Systems  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Multi-Experts Analytic Hierarchy Process for the Sensitivity Analysis of Passive Safety Systems YU systems to increase their safety and reliability. However, during accidental scenarios, uncertainties Residual Heat Removal system (RHRs) of the High Temperature Reactor-Pebble Modular (HTR-PM). Key words

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

200

DOE Standard 3009-2014, Preparation of Nonreactor Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analysis, Roll Out Training  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Nuclear Safety is performing a series of site visits to provide roll-out training and assistance to Program and Site Offices and their contractors on effective implementation of the new revision to DOE Standard 3009-2014, Preparation of Nonreactor Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analysis.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "job safety analysis" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Aspects of environmental and safety analysis of fusion reactors  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This report summarizes the progress made between October 1976 and September 1977 in studies of some environmental and safety considerations in fusion reactor plants. A methodology to assess the admissible occurrence rate ...

Kazimi, Mujid S.

1977-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

202

STEP Intern Job Description  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

STEP Intern Job Description, from the Tool Kit Framework: Small Town University Energy Program (STEP).

203

Hydrogen Safety Project chemical analysis support task: Window C'' volatile organic analysis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This data package contains the results obtained by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) staff in the characterization of samples for the 101-SY Hydrogen Safety Project. The samples were submitted for analysis by Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC) under the Technical Project Plan (TPP) 17667 and the Quality Assurance Plan MCS-027. They came from a core taken during Window C'' after the May 1991 gas release event. The analytical procedures required for analysis were defined in the Test Instructions (TI) prepared by the PNL 101-SY Analytical Chemistry Laboratory (ACL) Project Management Office in accordance with the TPP and the QA Plan. The requested analysis for these samples was volatile organic analysis. The quality control (QC) requirements for each sample are defined in the Test Instructions for each sample. The QC requirements outlined in the procedures and requested in the WHC statement of work were followed.

Gillespie, B.M.; Stromatt, R.W.; Ross, G.A.; Hoope, E.A.

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

204

Hydrogen Safety Project chemical analysis support task: Window ``C`` volatile organic analysis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This data package contains the results obtained by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) staff in the characterization of samples for the 101-SY Hydrogen Safety Project. The samples were submitted for analysis by Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC) under the Technical Project Plan (TPP) 17667 and the Quality Assurance Plan MCS-027. They came from a core taken during Window ``C`` after the May 1991 gas release event. The analytical procedures required for analysis were defined in the Test Instructions (TI) prepared by the PNL 101-SY Analytical Chemistry Laboratory (ACL) Project Management Office in accordance with the TPP and the QA Plan. The requested analysis for these samples was volatile organic analysis. The quality control (QC) requirements for each sample are defined in the Test Instructions for each sample. The QC requirements outlined in the procedures and requested in the WHC statement of work were followed.

Gillespie, B.M.; Stromatt, R.W.; Ross, G.A.; Hoope, E.A.

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

205

Running Jobs on Edison  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

jobs jobs Running jobs Quick Instructions for Hopper users Major differences between running jobs on Hopper and Edison are: the number of cores per node are different, and the Intel Hyper-threading option is available on Edison. Read More » Overview A brief overview of how to run jobs on Edison. Read More » Interactive Jobs Interactive jobs may be run on Edison by requesting resources from the batch system. "qsub -I -V -q interactive -lmppwidth=[num_cores]" is the basic command to request interactive resources. Read More » Batch Jobs Batch script options. Read More » Example Batch Scripts Sample batch scripts for MPI, OpenMP, hybrid applications and various workflows. Read More » Job Launch Command: aprun Aprun is the job launcher for Cray XC30. There are many options that are

206

SAFETY ANALYSIS AND INTEGRATION FOR ROBOTIC SYSTEMS -APPLICATION TO A  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Analysis (FMEA) and Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) which identify potential unit errors resulting in hazards

Guiochet, Jérémie

207

Electrical Safety - Monthly Analyses of Electrical Safety Occurrences  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Office of Analysis Office of Analysis Operating Experience Committee Safety Alerts Safety Bulletins Annual Reports Special Operations Reports Safety Advisories Special Reports Causal Analysis Reviews Contact Us HSS Logo Electrical Safety Monthly Analyses of Electrical Safety Occurrences 2013 September 2013 Electrical Safety Occurrences August 2013 Electrical Safety Occurrences July 2013 Electrical Safety Occurrences June 2013 Electrical Safety Occurrences May 2013 Electrical Safety Occurrences April 2013 Electrical Safety Occurrences March Electrical Safety Occurrence February Electrical Safety Occurrence January Electrical Safety Occurrence 2012 December Electrical Safety Occurrence November Electrical Safety Occurrence October Electrical Safety Occurrence September Electrical Safety Occurrence

208

Use of Fault Tree Analysis for Automotive Reliability and Safety Analysis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Fault tree analysis (FTA) evolved from the aerospace industry in the 1960's. A fault tree is deductive logic model that is generated with a top undesired event in mind. FTA answers the question, ''how can something occur?'' as opposed to failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) that is inductive and answers the question, ''what if?'' FTA is used in risk, reliability and safety assessments. FTA is currently being used by several industries such as nuclear power and chemical processing. Typically the automotive industries uses failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) such as design FMEAs and process FMEAs. The use of FTA has spread to the automotive industry. This paper discusses the use of FTA for automotive applications. With the addition automotive electronics for various applications in systems such as engine/power control, cruise control and braking/traction, FTA is well suited to address failure modes within these systems. FTA can determine the importance of these failure modes from various perspectives such as cost, reliability and safety. A fault tree analysis of a car starting system is presented as an example.

Lambert, H

2003-09-24T23:59:59.000Z

209

CORCON-MOD1 preliminary evaluation and application to safety analysis of a large LMFBR plant  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The CORCON-MOD1 core material-concrete interaction code, developed at the Sandia Laboratories for LWR safety analysis, was adapted for analyzing a postulated LMFBR core melt accident.

Chen, K.H.; Ray, K.S.

1981-06-30T23:59:59.000Z

210

Fuzzy Failure Rate for Nuclear Power Plant Probabilistic Safety Assessment by Fault Tree Analysis  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Reliability data is essential for a nuclear power plant probabilistic safety assessment by fault tree analysis ... a failure possibility-based reliability algorithm to assess nuclear event reliability data from f...

Julwan Hendry Purba; Jie Lu; Guangquan Zhang

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

211

Development of a safety analysis system for the offshore personnel and equipment transfer process  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

and Effect Analysis (FMEA) was performed. With the FMEA the question "What if?" is asked for each component. For example, "What if the lifting cable fails' ?". Each component was evaluated for failure mode, failure effects on other components... swell or waves stood out as primary factors in the safety of the transfer process. Failure Mode and Effect Anal sis With component failure a recognized factor in the safety of the transfer process, more in-depth analysis was merited. The FMEA...

McKenna, Michael George

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

212

Hazard Categorization and Accident Analysis Techniques for Compliance with DOE Order 5480.23, Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

he purpose of this DOE Standard is to establish guidance for the preparation and review of hazard categorization and accident analyses techniques as required in DOE Order 5480.23, Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports.

1997-12-12T23:59:59.000Z

213

Formal Safety analysis of a radiobased railroad crossing using Deductive CauseConsequence  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

#ects analysis (FMEA) and fault tree analysis (FTA). We apply the method to a real world case study: a radio (DCCA). This technique is a formal generalization of well­known safety analysis methods like FMEA [10 by analyzed) than traditional FMEA. We show, that the results of DCCA have the same semantics as those

Reif, Wolfgang

214

Submitting PDSF Jobs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Submitting PDSF Jobs Submitting PDSF Jobs Submitting PDSF Jobs Univa Grid Engine (UGE) is the batch system used at PDSF. This is a fork of the Sun Grid Engine (SGE). PDSF batch jobs have a 1 day wallclock limit. If your job attempts to run beyond the wallclock limit UGE will kill it. The total number of jobs (running, pending or otherwise) for all users is limited to 30,000 and the number of jobs a single user can have at any one time is limited to 5000. Since PDSF is a shared facility any jobs that are detrimental to the overall performance of the batch system are subject to being deleted at the discretion of the PDSF staff. If this happens, you will be notified and asked to adjust your workflow as necessary. If you are planning to submit thousands of short jobs concurrently consider

215

Coordination Meeting with National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Field Office Safety Basis Review Team Leader for Transuranic Waste Facility Preiminary Documented Safety Analysis Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

HIAR-LANL-2013-04-08 HIAR-LANL-2013-04-08 Site: Los Alamos National Laboratory Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for Coordination Meeting with National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Field Office Safety Basis Review Team Leader for Transuranic Waste Facility Preliminary Documented Safety Analysis Report Dates of Activity : 04/08/13 Report Preparer: James O. Low Activity Description/Purpose: The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) staff visited the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) to coordinate with the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Los Alamos Field Office (NA-00-LA) Safety Basis Review Team (SBRT) Leader for review of the revised preliminary documented safety analysis (PDSA) for the Transuranic Waste

216

Coordination Meeting with National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Field Office Safety Basis Review Team Leader for Transuranic Waste Facility Preiminary Documented Safety Analysis Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HIAR-LANL-2013-04-08 HIAR-LANL-2013-04-08 Site: Los Alamos National Laboratory Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for Coordination Meeting with National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Field Office Safety Basis Review Team Leader for Transuranic Waste Facility Preliminary Documented Safety Analysis Report Dates of Activity : 04/08/13 Report Preparer: James O. Low Activity Description/Purpose: The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) staff visited the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) to coordinate with the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Los Alamos Field Office (NA-00-LA) Safety Basis Review Team (SBRT) Leader for review of the revised preliminary documented safety analysis (PDSA) for the Transuranic Waste

217

A semiotic analysis of biotechnology and food safety photographs  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This study evaluated photographs used in Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News and World Report in stories about biotechnology and food safety issues from the years 2000 and 2001. This study implemented a semiotic methodology to determine if the messages...

Norwood, Jennifer Lynn

2006-04-12T23:59:59.000Z

218

Oak Ridge National Laboratory site data for safety-analysis report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Oak Ridge National Laboratory site data contained herein were compiled in support of the United States Department of Energy (USDOE) Oak Ridge Operations Office Order OR 5481.1. That order sets forth assignment of responsibilities for safety analysis and review responsibilities and provides guidance relative to the content and format of safety analysis reports. The information presented in this document is intended for use by reference in individual safety analysis reports where applicable to support accident analyses or the establishment of design bases of significance to safety, and it is applicable only to Oak Ridge National Laboratory facilities in Bethel and Melton Valleys. This information includes broad descriptions of the site characteristics, radioactive waste handling and monitoring practices, and the organization and operating policies at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The historical background of the Laboratory is discussed briefly and the overall physical situation of the facilities is described in the following paragraphs.

Fitzpatrick, F.C.

1982-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

219

Jobs Calculator | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Jobs Calculator Jobs Calculator owipjobscalculatorv11-0.xls More Documents & Publications bbanxxxxxxxpmcprogressreport2y12qx.xlsx Job Counting Guidelines Title...

220

Department of Mathematics: Math Jobs  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Jobs at IBM · General Job Hunting Tools and Online Sources From Purdue ... They claim to have the Internet's largest list of job hunting sites. It IS "world class!

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "job safety analysis" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Microsoft Word - cug2010_JobComp.doc  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

10 Proceedings 1 of 12 10 Proceedings 1 of 12 Franklin Job Completion Analysis Hwa-Chun Wendy Lin, Yun (Helen) He, Woo-Sun Yang National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC) ABSTRACT: The NERSC Cray XT4 machine Franklin has been in production for 3000+ users since October 2007, where about 1800 jobs run each day. There has been an on-going effort to better understand how well these jobs run, whether failed jobs are due to application errors or system issues, and to further reduce system related job failures. In this paper, we talk about the progress we made in tracking job completion status, in identifying job failure root cause, and in expediting resolution of job failures, such as hung jobs, that are caused by system issues. In addition, we present some Cray software

222

Safety, Dependability and Performance Analysis of Extended AADL Models  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......analysis Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) and fault tree analysis (FTA), model...Wesupporttwopopularhazardanalysistechniques:FMEA and FTA. Both techniques are realized...symbolic model checking [33, 34]. (i) FMEA is an inductive technique that starts by......

Marco Bozzano; Alessandro Cimatti; Joost-Pieter Katoen; Viet Yen Nguyen; Thomas Noll; Marco Roveri

2011-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

223

Examining Commuting Times and Jobs-housing Imbalance in Seoul: An Empirical Analysis of Urban Spatial Structure  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

; Rii & Ahn, 2001). Economic growth in Seoul has promoted the migration of populations from rural areas to Seoul due to job opportunities based on the transformation of the socioeconomic structure (Rii & Ahn, 2001). This phenomenon also implied... environment (Cho, 2002; Jun & Hur, 2001; Kim & Mills, 1988; Rii & Ahn, 2001). Basically, this policy was put in place to regulate urban sprawl by implementing development regulations in suburban areas (Badamdorj, 2004). The greenbelts policy seemed...

Jin, Sun Mi

2012-10-19T23:59:59.000Z

224

Process hazards analysis (PrHA) program, bridging accident analyses and operational safety  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Recently the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) for the Plutonium Facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Technical Area 55 (TA-55) was revised and submitted to the US. Department of Energy (DOE). As a part of this effort, over seventy Process Hazards Analyses (PrHAs) were written and/or revised over the six years prior to the FSAR revision. TA-55 is a research, development, and production nuclear facility that primarily supports US. defense and space programs. Nuclear fuels and material research; material recovery, refining and analyses; and the casting, machining and fabrication of plutonium components are some of the activities conducted at TA-35. These operations involve a wide variety of industrial, chemical and nuclear hazards. Operational personnel along with safety analysts work as a team to prepare the PrHA. PrHAs describe the process; identi fy the hazards; and analyze hazards including determining hazard scenarios, their likelihood, and consequences. In addition, the interaction of the process to facility systems, structures and operational specific protective features are part of the PrHA. This information is rolled-up to determine bounding accidents and mitigating systems and structures. Further detailed accident analysis is performed for the bounding accidents and included in the FSAR. The FSAR is part of the Documented Safety Analysis (DSA) that defines the safety envelope for all facility operations in order to protect the worker, the public, and the environment. The DSA is in compliance with the US. Code of Federal Regulations, 10 CFR 830, Nuclear Safety Management and is approved by DOE. The DSA sets forth the bounding conditions necessary for the safe operation for the facility and is essentially a 'license to operate.' Safely of day-to-day operations is based on Hazard Control Plans (HCPs). Hazards are initially identified in the PrI-IA for the specific operation and act as input to the HCP. Specific protective features important to worker safety are incorporated so the worker can readily identify the safety parameters of the their work. System safety tools such as Preliminary Hazard Analysis, What-If Analysis, Hazard and Operability Analysis as well as other techniques as necessary provide the groundwork for both determining bounding conditions for facility safety, operational safety, and day-to-clay worker safety.

Richardson, J. A. (Jeanne A.); McKernan, S. A. (Stuart A.); Vigil, M. J. (Michael J.)

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

225

Final report for confinement vessel analysis. Task 2, Safety vessel impact analyses  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes two sets of finite element analyses performed under Task 2 of the Confinement Vessel Analysis Program. In each set of analyses, a charge is assumed to have detonated inside the confinement vessel, causing the confinement vessel to fail in either of two ways; locally around the weld line of a nozzle, or catastrophically into two hemispheres. High pressure gases from the internal detonation pressurize the inside of the safety vessel and accelerate the fractured nozzle or hemisphere into the safety vessel. The first set of analyses examines the structural integrity of the safety vessel when impacted by the fractured nozzle. The objective of these calculations is to determine if the high strength bolt heads attached to the nozzle penetrate or fracture the lower strength safety vessel, thus allowing gaseous detonation products to escape to the atmosphere. The two dimensional analyses predict partial penetration of the safety vessel beneath the tip of the penetrator. The analyses also predict maximum principal strains in the safety vessel which exceed the measured ultimate strain of steel. The second set of analyses examines the containment capability of the safety vessel closure when impacted by half a confinement vessel (hemisphere). The predicted response is the formation of a 0.6-inch gap, caused by relative sliding and separation between the two halves of the safety vessel. Additional analyses with closure designs that prevent the gap formation are recommended.

Murray, Y.D. [APTEK, Inc., Colorado Springs, CO (United States)

1994-01-26T23:59:59.000Z

226

SUMMER JOB: Job Title: Cotton Scout  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

SUMMER JOB: Job Title: Cotton Scout Location: Georgetown, TX area / Williamson & Milam Counties Description: Cotton scouts will aid in conducting the Williamson/Milam County Cotton IPM program by scouting cotton fields and reporting on crop status and pest and beneficial insect abundance. Must be able to work

Behmer, Spencer T.

227

Hopper Batch Jobs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Batch Jobs Batch Jobs Batch Jobs Overview Batch jobs are jobs that run non-interactively under the control of a "batch script," which is a text file containing a number of job directives and LINUX commands or utilities. Batch scripts are submitted to the "batch system," where they are queued awaiting free resources on Hopper. The batch system on Hopper is known as "Torque." Bare-Bones Batch Script The simplest Hopper batch script will look something like this. #PBS -q regular #PBS -l mppwidth=48 #PBS -l walltime=00:10:00 cd $PBS_O_WORKDIR aprun -n 48 ./my_executable This example illustrates the basic parts of a script: Job directive lines begin with #PBS. These "Torque Directives" tell the batch system how many nodes to reserve for your job and how long to

228

Edison Batch Jobs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Batch Jobs Batch Jobs Batch Jobs Overview Batch jobs are jobs that run non-interactively under the control of a "batch script," which is a text file containing a number of job directives and LINUX commands or utilities. Batch scripts are submitted to the "batch system," where they are queued awaiting free resources on Edison. The batch system on Edison is known as "Torque." Bare-Bones Batch Script The simplest Edison batch script will look something like this. #PBS -q regular #PBS -l mppwidth=32 #PBS -l walltime=00:10:00 cd $PBS_O_WORKDIR aprun -n 32 ./my_executable This example illustrates the basic parts of a script: Job directive lines begin with #PBS. These "Torque Directives" tell the batch system how many nodes to reserve for your job and how long to

229

Edison Batch Jobs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Batch Jobs Batch Jobs Batch Jobs Overview Batch jobs are jobs that run non-interactively under the control of a "batch script," which is a text file containing a number of job directives and LINUX commands or utilities. Batch scripts are submitted to the "batch system," where they are queued awaiting free resources on Edison. The batch system on Edison is known as "Torque." Bare-Bones Batch Script The simplest Edison batch script will look something like this. #PBS -q regular #PBS -l mppwidth=48 #PBS -l walltime=00:10:00 cd $PBS_O_WORKDIR aprun -n 48 ./my_executable This example illustrates the basic parts of a script: Job directive lines begin with #PBS. These "Torque Directives" tell the batch system how many nodes to reserve for your job and how long to

230

Pending Jobs by Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Pending Jobs by Group Pending Jobs by Group Daily Graph: Weekly Graph: Monthly Graph: Yearly Graph: 2 Year Graph: Last edited: 2011-04-05 14:00:14...

231

Running Jobs on Edison  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

jobs Running jobs Quick Instructions for Hopper users Edison has the same number of cores per node, 24, but has a larger per core memory, 2.67 GB vs. 1.3 GB. On Edison the Intel...

232

US ITER | Jobs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Postings Careers in Fusion Science ITER Jobs Home > Jobs > Careers in Fusion Science Learn More About Working at US ITER and Careers in Fusion Science Jan Berry Takes a Different...

233

PDSF Interactive Batch Jobs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Interactive Batch Jobs Running Interactive Batch Jobs You cannot login to the PDSF batch nodes directly but you can run an interactive session on a batch node using either qlogin...

234

Submitting Batch Jobs on Franklin  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Submitting Batch Jobs Submitting Batch Jobs Debug Jobs Short jobs requesting less than 30 minutes and requiring 512 nodes (2,048 cores) or fewer can run in the debug queue. From...

235

Using Job Arrays on Carver  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

on Carver Using Job Arrays on Carver Job Arrays Job arrays are a way to submit many jobs using only 1 batch submission script. The term task arrays is often used in...

236

Monitoring and Managing PDSF Jobs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Monitoring and Managing Jobs Monitoring and Managing Jobs Commonly Used Commands Action How to do it Comment Get a summary of all batch jobs sgeusers Shows a tally of all jobs for...

237

Safety Analysis of an Airbag System using Probabilistic FMEA and Probabilistic Counter Examples  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Safety Analysis of an Airbag System using Probabilistic FMEA and Probabilistic Counter Examples Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a technique to reason about possible system hazards that result from system or system component failures. Traditionally, FMEA does not take the probabilities

Leue, Stefan

238

Safety Analysis of an Airbag System using Probabilistic FMEA and Probabilistic Counterexamples  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Safety Analysis of an Airbag System using Probabilistic FMEA and Probabilistic Counterexamples H analysis (FMEA) is a technique to reason about possible system hazards that result from system or system component failures. Tradition- ally, FMEA does not take the probabilities with which these failures may

Leue, Stefan

239

Overheads, Safety Analysis and Engineering FY 1995 Site Support Program Plan WBS 6.3.5  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Safety Analysis & Engineering (SA&E) department provides core competency for safety analysis and risk documentation that supports achievement of the goals and mission as described in the Hanford Mission Plan, Volume I, Site Guidance (DOE-RL 1993). SA&E operations are integrated into the programs that plan and conduct safe waste management, environmental restoration, and operational activities. SA&E personnel are key members of task teams assigned to eliminate urgent risks and inherent threats that exist at the Hanford Site. Key to ensuring protection of public health and safety, and that of onsite workers, are the products and services provided by the department. SA&E will continue to provide a leadership role throughout the DOE complex with innovative, cost-effective approaches to ensuring safety during environmental cleanup operations. The SA&E mission is to provide support to direct program operations through safety analysis and risk documentation and to maintain an infrastructure responsive to the evolutionary climate at the Hanford Site. SA&E will maintain the appropriate skills mix necessary to fulfill the customers need to conduct all operations in a safe and cost-effective manner while ensuring the safety of the public and the onsite worker.

DiVincenzo, E.P.

1994-09-27T23:59:59.000Z

240

Franklin Completed Jobs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Completed Jobs Franklin Completed Jobs Select a time period Show jobs that completed after Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "job safety analysis" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Civil/Structural Engineering FAQS  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Step 1: Identify and Evaluate Tasks Step 1: Identify and Evaluate Tasks Job Analysis Worksheet for Tasks, Civil/Structural Engineering FAQ Completed May 9, 2012 Task Source Importance Frequency A. Review safety documents and prepare evaluation reports. Civil/Structural Working Group Consensus 5 2 B. Review and assess identification of site specific natural phenomena and other external and internal hazards, design basis accidents, and safety classification of applicable controls to ensure integrity of structures, systems and components. Civil/Structural Working Group Consensus 5 2 C. Perform design reviews to ensure design inputs and assumptions, design methodologies, documentation, etc., are in accordance with the DOE standards, national consensus codes and standards, acceptable practice and project

242

Functional Area Qualification Standard Job Task Analyses | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Services » Assistance » Federal Technical Capability Program » Services » Assistance » Federal Technical Capability Program » Functional Area Qualification Standard Job Task Analyses Functional Area Qualification Standard Job Task Analyses DOE Aviation Manager DOE Aviation Safety Officer Chemical Processing Civil/Structural Engineering Confinement Ventilation and Process Gas Treatment Construction Management Deactivation and Decommissioning Electrical Systems and Safety Oversight Emergency Management Environmental Compliance Environmental Restoration Facility Representative Fire Protection Engineering General Technical Base Industrial Hygiene Instrument and Controls NNSA Package Certification Engineer Nuclear Explosive Safety Study Nuclear Safety Specialist Quality Assurance Radiation Protection Safeguards and Security Safeguards and Security General Technical Base

243

Analysis of Fundamental NIST Sphere Experiments Related to Criticality Safety  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A series of neutron transport experiments was performed in 1989 and 1990 at NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) using a spherical stainless steel container and fission chambers. These experiments were performed to help understand errors observed in criticality calculations for arrays of individually subcritical components, particularly solution arrays [1-3]. They were supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Environment and Health, Nuclear Criticality Technology and Safety Project. The intent was to evaluate the possibility that the criticality prediction errors stem from errors in the calculation of neutron leakage from individual components of the array. Thus, the explicit product of the experiments was the measurement of the leakage flux, as characterized by various Cd-shielded and unshielded fission rates. Because the various fission rates have different neutron-energy sensitivities, collectively they give an indication of the energy dependence of the leakage flux. Leakage and moderation were varied systematically through the use of different diameter spheres, with and without water. Some of these experiments with bare fission chambers have been evaluated by the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP)[4].

Kim, Soon S.

2007-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

244

Station Blackout: A case study in the interaction of mechanistic and probabilistic safety analysis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The ability to better characterize and quantify safety margins is important to improved decision making about nuclear power plant design, operation, and plant life extension. As research and development (R&D) in the light-water reactor (LWR) Sustainability (LWRS) Program and other collaborative efforts yield new data, sensors, and improved scientific understanding of physical processes that govern the aging and degradation of plant SSCs needs and opportunities to better optimize plant safety and performance will become known. The purpose of the Risk Informed Safety Margin Characterization (RISMC) Pathway R&D is to support plant decisions for risk-informed margin management with the aim to improve economics, reliability, and sustain safety of current NPPs. In this paper, we describe the RISMC analysis process illustrating how mechanistic and probabilistic approaches are combined in order to estimate a safety margin. We use the scenario of a “station blackout” wherein offsite power and onsite power is lost, thereby causing a challenge to plant safety systems. We describe the RISMC approach, illustrate the station blackout modeling, and contrast this with traditional risk analysis modeling for this type of accident scenario.

Curtis Smith; Diego Mandelli; Cristian Rabiti

2013-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

245

PDSF Batch Job Example  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

PDSF Batch Job Example PDSF Batch Job Example PDSF Batch Job Example On this page we show an example of how to run a simple batch job, monitor it, check its output, and look at the SGE accounting information about it. We start with a simple script named hello.csh, which just sleeps a bit and then writes some output: pdsf4 72% cat hello.csh #!/bin/csh sleep 600 echo "Hello, World" The simplest way to submit it is to just use qsub without any options: pdsf4 74% qsub hello.csh Your job 1787239 ("hello.csh") has been submitted We can check on its status with qstat. Use the -u option to get only your jobs: pdsf4 75% qstat -u hjort job-ID prior name user state submit/start at queue slots ja-task-ID -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

246

Safety analysis report for the TRUPACT-II shipping package (condensed version). Volume 1, Rev. 14  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The condensed version of the TRUPACT-II Contact Handled Transuranic Waste Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP) contains essential material required by TRUPACT-II users, plus additional contents (payload) information previously submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. All or part of the following sections, which are not required by users of the TRUPACT-II, are deleted from the condensed version: (i) structural analysis, (ii) thermal analysis, (iii) containment analysis, (iv) criticality analysis, (v) shielding analysis, and (vi) hypothetical accident test results.

NONE

1994-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

247

FAQS Gap Analysis Qualification Card – Nuclear Safety Specialist  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Functional Area Qualification Standard Gap Analysis Qualification Cards outline the differences between the last and latest version of the FAQ Standard.

248

Safety Analysis (SA) of the decontamination facility, Building 419, at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This safety analysis was performed for the Manager, Plant Services at LLNL and fulfills the requirements of DOE Order 5481.1. The analysis was based on field inspections, document review, computer calculations, and extensive input from Waste Management personnel. It was concluded that the maximum quantities of radioactive materials that safety procedures allow to be handled in this building do not pose undue risks on- or off-site even in postulated severe accidents. Risk from the various hazards at this facility vary from low to moderate as specified in DOE Order 5481.1. Recommendations are made for improvements that will reduce risks even further.

Odell, B.N.

1980-06-17T23:59:59.000Z

249

About Fermilab - Safety  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Profiles in Safety "Safety starts days or weeks before the actual job. Think through the job and all the possible hazards that could emerge. Make a plan and a backup plan to deal with each hazard. Don't wait until you are in danger to realize you aren't prepared." Donna Hicks "In the Receiving Department, safety is always the top priority. To reduce the amount of lifting and bending, a member of our team suggested using a conveyor system to lower the potential for injury." Dennis McAuliff "Safety takes a team effort just like football. If one member of the team is injured, everyone on the team is affected. Before doing a job, just like running a play, everyone should know their part and what their teammates will do. Communication maintains a team focus."

250

Office of Environmental Protection, Sustainability Support, and Corporate Safety Analysis  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Environmental Protection, Sustainability Support and Analysis establishes environmental protection requirements and expectations for the Department to ensure protection of workers and the public and protection of the environment from the hazards associated with all Department operations.

251

Jobs | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Jobs Jobs Ames Site Office (AMSO) AMSO Home About Organization Chart .pdf file (113KB) Federal Stewardship Internal Site Office Operations Jobs Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Ames Site Office U.S. Department of Energy 9800 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 P: (630) 252-6167 F: (630) 252-2855 About Jobs Print Text Size: A A A Subscribe FeedbackShare Page Current Open Federal Positions The Ames Site Office is located in Argonne, Illinois. All open federal positions listed below are posted on USAJobs.gov External link . (Ames Site Office Organization Chart .pdf file (113KB)) Position Details Job Number Opened Closes No positions in AMSO are currently open Important note: Please read job opportunity announcements carefully to identify the

252

Jobs | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Jobs Jobs SLAC Site Office (SSO) SSO Home About Organization Chart .pdf file (155KB) Phone List Jobs Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Contact Information SLAC Site Office U.S. Department of Energy Bldg 41, M/S 08A 2575 Sand Hill Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 P: (650) 926-2505 About Jobs Print Text Size: A A A Subscribe FeedbackShare Page Current Open Federal Positions The SLAC Site Office is located in Menlo Park, California. All open federal positions listed below are posted on USAJobs.gov External link . (SLAC Site Office Organization Chart .pdf file (155KB)) Position Details Job Number Opened Closes No positions in SSO are currently open Important note: Please read job opportunity announcements carefully to identify the specific documentation requirements listed in individual announcements. All

253

Jobs | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Jobs Jobs Argonne Site Office (ASO) ASO Home About Organization Chart .pdf file (82KB) Organization Jobs Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Argonne Site Office U.S. Department of Energy 9800 South Cass Avenue Building 201 Argonne, IL 60439 P: (630) 252-8637 About Jobs Print Text Size: A A A Subscribe FeedbackShare Page Current Open Federal Positions The Argonne Site Office is located in Argonne, Illinois. All open federal positions listed below are posted on USAJobs.gov External link . (Argonne Site Office Organization Chart .pdf file (82KB)) Position Details Job Number Opened Closes No positions in ASO are currently open Important note: Please read job opportunity announcements carefully to identify the

254

Jobs | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Jobs Jobs Berkeley Site Office (BSO) BSO Home About Organization Chart .pdf file (106KB) Staff Jobs Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Berkeley Site Office U.S. Department of Energy One Cyclotron Road Berkeley, CA 94720 P: (510) 486-5784 E: bsowebinfo@bso.science.doe.gov About Jobs Print Text Size: A A A Subscribe FeedbackShare Page Current Open Federal Positions The Berkeley Site Office is located in Berkeley, California. All open federal positions listed below are posted on USAJobs.gov External link . (Berkeley Site Office Organization Chart .pdf file (106KB)) Position Details Job Number Opened Closes No positions in BSO are currently open Important note: Please read job opportunity announcements carefully to identify the

255

CFAST Computer Code Application Guidance for Documented Safety Analysis, Final Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Final CFAST Code Guidance Final CFAST Code Guidance CFAST Computer Code Application Guidance for Documented Safety Analysis Final Report U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environment, Safety and Health 1000 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20585-2040 July 2004 DOE/NNSA-DP Technical Report CFAST Computer Code Application Guidance Final Report July 2004 ii INTENTIONALLY BLANK. DOE/NNSA-DP Technical Report CFAST Computer Code Application Guidance Final Report July 2004 iii FOREWORD This document provides guidance to Department of Energy (DOE) facility analysts in the use of the CFAST computer software for supporting Documented Safety Analysis applications. Information is provided herein that supplements information found in the CFAST documentation

256

Integrated Safety Analysis: Why It Is Appropriate for Fuel Recycling Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Integrated Safety Analysis: Why It Is Appropriate for Fuel Recycling Facilities Executive Summary This paper addresses why the use of an Integrated Safety Analysis ("ISA") is appropriate for fuel recycling facilities 1 which would be licensed under new regulations currently being considered by NRC. The use of the ISA for fuel facilities under Part 70 is described and compared to the use of a Probabilistic Risk Assessment ("PRA") for reactor facilities. A basis is provided for concluding that future recycling facilities - which will possess characteristics similar to today's fuel cycle facilities and distinct from reactors - can best be assessed using established qualitative or semi-quantitative ISA techniques to achieve and demonstrate safety in an effective and efficient manner.

257

Functional reliability analysis of Safety Grade Decay Heat Removal System of Indian 500 MWe PFBR  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Passive systems are increasingly deployed in nuclear industry with an objective of increasing reliability and safety of operations with reduced cost. Methods for assessing the reliability of thermal–hydraulic passive systems, that is systems with moving working fluid, address the issues in natural buoyancy-driven flow that could result in a failure to meet the design safety limits under accident scenarios. This is referred as design functional reliability. This paper presents the results of functional reliability analysis carried out for the passive Safety Grade Decay Heat Removal System (SGDHRS) of Indian Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR). The analysis is carried out based on the overall approach reported in the Reliability Methods for Passive System (RMPS, European Commission) project. Functional failure probability is calculated using Monte-Carlo method and also with method of moments.

T. Sajith Mathews; M. Ramakrishnan; U. Parthasarathy; A. John Arul; C. Senthil Kumar

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

258

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Facility Representative  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Job/Task Analysis Job/Task Analysis Importance Scale Frequency Scale Competency Need Timeframe 0 Not Performed or N/A 3 Important 0 Not Performed 3 Every few days to weekly 1 On first day 4 After 1st 6 months 1 Not Important 4 Very Important 1 Every few months to yearly 4 Every few hours to daily 2 Within first 3 months 5 Prior to Qualification 2 Somewhat Important 5 Extremely Important 2 Every few weeks to monthly 5 Hourly to many times each hour 3 Within first 4-6 months 1 CONDUCTING THE JOB / TASK ANALYSIS Step 1 Identify and evaluate tasks - Develop a comprehensive list of tasks that define the job. o A great starting point is the list of Duties and Responsibilities from the FAQS. o Give careful thought to additional tasks that could be considered.

259

Preliminary Accident Analysis for Construction and Operation of the Chornobyl New Safety Confinement  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Analysis of potential exposure of personal and population during construction and exploitation of the New Safe Confinement was made. Scenarios of hazard event development were ranked. It is shown, that as a whole construction and exploitation of the NSC are in accordance with actual radiation safety norms of Ukraine.

Batiy, Valeriy; Rubezhansky, Yruiy; Rudko, Vladimir; shcherbin, vladimir; Yegorov, V; Schmieman, Eric A.; Timmins, Douglas C.

2005-08-08T23:59:59.000Z

260

NASA/TM-2007-214856 Safety and Performance Analysis of the  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

March 2007 NASA/TM-2007-214856 Safety and Performance Analysis of the Non-Radar Oceanic National Institute of Aerospace, Hampton, Virginia #12;The NASA STI Program Office . . . in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to the advancement of aeronautics and space science. The NASA

Muñoz, César A.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "job safety analysis" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

NASA/TM-2009-215768 A Mathematical Basis for the Safety Analysis of  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

June 2009 NASA/TM-2009-215768 A Mathematical Basis for the Safety Analysis of Conflict Prevention, Virginia Gilles Dowek Ecole Polytechnique, France #12;NASA STI Program . . . in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to the advancement of aeronautics and space science. The NASA scientific

Maddalon, Jeffrey M.

262

Combining Functional and Structural Reasoning for Safety Analysis of Electrical Designs  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

in detail. FLAME has been developed over several years, and is capable of composing an FMEA report for many Failure mode effects analysis (FMEA) of a design involves the investigation and assessment of the effects, electronic and mechanical systems are being combined in safety-critical applications. Automation of FMEA

Snooke, Neal

263

Spent nuclear fuel project - criteria document spent nuclear fuel final safety analysis report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The criteria document provides the criteria and planning guidance for developing the Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR). This FSAR will support the US Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office decision to authorize the procurement, installation, installation acceptance testing, startup, and operation of the SNF Project facilities (K Basins, Cold Vacuum Drying Facility, and Canister Storage Building).

MORGAN, R.G.

1999-02-23T23:59:59.000Z

264

Queueing & Running Jobs | Argonne Leadership Computing Facility  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

System Overview Data Storage & File Systems Compiling & Linking Queueing & Running Jobs Reservations Cobalt Job Control How to Queue a Job Running Jobs FAQs Queuing and Running on...

265

Job Openings at CEES  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Job Openings at the Center for Electrical Energy Storage All CEES positions are currently filled. For more information about Postdoctoral Fellowship Programs at Argonne, please...

266

WEBSITE RESOURCES FOR GREEN JOBS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Clean Technology Jobs Listings http://jobs.cleanedge.com/ ­ Source for clean tech job seekers http://www.cleanloop.com/ ­ Clean technology job listings and opinions, as well as a blog http://cleantech.jobthread.com/ ­ Job listings of commercial clean technologies http://cleantechjobs.cleantechies.com ­ Many listings of clean

Edwards, Paul N.

267

Receiving Basin for Offsite Fuels and the Resin Regeneration Facility Safety Analysis Report, Executive Summary  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Safety Analysis Report documents the safety authorization basis for the Receiving Basin for Offsite Fuels (RBOF) and the Resin Regeneration Facility (RRF) at the Savannah River Site (SRS). The present mission of the RBOF and RRF is to continue in providing a facility for the safe receipt, storage, handling, and shipping of spent nuclear fuel assemblies from power and research reactors in the United States, fuel from SRS and other Department of Energy (DOE) reactors, and foreign research reactors fuel, in support of the nonproliferation policy. The RBOF and RRF provide the capability to handle, separate, and transfer wastes generated from nuclear fuel element storage. The DOE and Westinghouse Savannah River Company, the prime operating contractor, are committed to managing these activities in such a manner that the health and safety of the offsite general public, the site worker, the facility worker, and the environment are protected.

Shedrow, C.B.

1999-11-29T23:59:59.000Z

268

Waste Tank Organic Safety Project: Analysis of liquid samples from Hanford waste tank 241-C-103  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A suite of physical and chemical analyses has been performed in support of activities directed toward the resolution of an Unreviewed Safety Question concerning the potential for a floating organic layer in Hanford waste tank 241-C-103 to sustain a pool fire. The analysis program was the result of a Data Quality Objectives exercise conducted jointly with staff from Westinghouse Hanford Company and Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL). The organic layer has been analyzed for flash point, organic composition including volatile organics, inorganic anions and cations, radionuclides, and other physical and chemical parameters needed for a safety assessment leading to the resolution of the Unreviewed Safety Question. The aqueous layer underlying the floating organic material was also analyzed for inorganic, organic, and radionuclide composition, as well as other physical and chemical properties. This work was conducted to PNL Quality Assurance impact level III standards (Good Laboratory Practices).

Pool, K.H.; Bean, R.M.

1994-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

269

A case study on effectiveness of structural reliability analysis in nuclear reactor safety assessment  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Problems on reliability of structural integrity occupy an important position in various aspects of nuclear reactor safety. In the present paper, an effective method for quantitative evaluation of structural reliability based on ‘stress strength model’ is developed with the objectives of taking a larger number of factors into the evaluation than before and giving useful results within moderate computing time. The method is applied to the reliability analysis of PWR pressure vessels. The results show the relative importance of inspection as well as the parameter uncertainty for assuring the reliability of the structure, although analysis is limited within the scope of linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM). This case study also shows that the analysis of structural reliability is effective for safety assessment of nuclear power plants in general and possibly for the improvements of the consistency in the design code.

A. Yamaguchi; S. Kondo; Y. Togo

1983-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

270

Community Power Works: Good Jobs, Green Jobs Conference | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

given by Community Power Works at the Good Jobs, Green Jobs Conference cpwgoodjobsgreenjobs-1.pdf More Documents & Publications Community Power Works Better Buildings...

271

Job Safety and Health Poster in Spanish  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Deben tener acceso a: Las publicaciones de seguridad y salud del Departamento de Energía; El programa de seguridad y salud en su lugar de trabajo; Este aviso de seguridad y salud; Copias de su historial médico y registros de su exposición a sustancias o condiciones tóxicas y peligrosas; y Resultados de inspecciones e investigaciones de accidentes. 2014

272

Criticality safety analysis of a borated-concrete absorber  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Fuel cycle facilities use slab tanks to store fissile solutions, because these tanks have both a high volume-to-floorspace efficiency and an easily verifiable, criticality control (thickness). The results of preliminary criticality analyses using a validated computer code and cross-section library, indicate that a slab tank designed without a solid neutron absorber is not economical in view of process requirements (inventory) and space limitations (layout). A subsequent calculational study assessed the possible increase in the thickness of a single, isolated slab tank using a solid neutron absorber. Finally, an analysis was performed to evaluate the maximum slab thickness for an array of tank/absorbers. The result of these studies showed the potential for expansion of slab tank thickness. 7 refs., 5 figs., 7 tabs.

Funabashi, H.; Oka, T.; Matsumoto, T.; Smolen, G.R. (Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corp., Tokai, Ibaraki (Japan); Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (USA))

1989-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

273

Jobs Creation Economic Recovery  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Commission (Energy Commission) collects the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) jobs creation and retention data (jobs data) from its subrecipients through the Energy Commission's ARRAJobs Creation and Economic Recovery Prompt, Fair, and Reasonable Use of ARRA Funds Subrecipient

274

Student Ambassador Job description  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Blue 1 Student Ambassador Job description Department: Student Administration and Registry Location: Varies - as advised by the UK Student Recruitment and Outreach Team Job title: Student Ambassador Responsible to: UK Student Recruitment and Outreach Team Payment and benefits: £6.42 per hour Duration

Anderson, Jim

275

Implementing 10 CFR 830 at the FEMP Silos: Nuclear Health and Safety Plans as Documented Safety Analysis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The objective of the Silos Project at the Fernald Closure Project (FCP) is to safely remediate high-grade uranium ore residues (Silos 1 and 2) and metal oxide residues (Silo 3). The evolution of Documented Safety Analyses (DSAs) for these facilities has reflected the changes in remediation processes. The final stage in silos DSAs is an interpretation of 10 CFR 830 Safe Harbor Requirements that combines a Health and Safety Plan with nuclear safety requirements. This paper will address the development of a Nuclear Health and Safety Plan, or N-HASP.

Fisk, Patricia; Rutherford, Lavon

2003-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

276

Nuclear Physics Jobs  

Office of Science (SC) Website

about/jobs/ Below is a list of currently open about/jobs/ Below is a list of currently open federal employment opportunities in the Office of Science. Prospective applicants should follow the links to the formal position announcements on USAJOBS.gov for more information. en {4D2B856C-39AE-4755-B38E-91319C75F8C9}https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/358553800 Physicist Facilities & Project Management Division Job Title: Physicist Facilities & Project Management DivisionOffice: Nuclear PhysicsURL: USAjobs listingVacancy Number: 14-DE-SC-HQ-003Location: Germantown, MDOpened: 01/14/2014Closes:

277

Running Jobs.ppt  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Submitting and Running Jobs on Submitting and Running Jobs on the Cray XT5 Richard Gerber NERSC User Services RAGerber@lbl.gov Joint Cray XT5 Workshop UC-Berkeley February 1, 2010 February 1, 2010 Joint Cray XT5 Workshop, UC Berkeley February 1, 2010 Joint Cray XT5 Workshop, UC Berkeley Outline * XT5 Overview * Creating and Submitting a Batch Job * How a Job Is Launched * Monitoring Your Job * Queues and Policies Hopper in blue; Jaguar in Orange; Kraken in Green February 1, 2010 Joint Cray XT5 Workshop, UC Berkeley Cray XT5 Overview Compute Node Compute Node Compute Node Compute Node Compute Node Compute Node Compute Node etc.... No local disk Login Node Login Node Login Node etc.... home Login Node Login Node $SCRATCH[1|2] /tmp/work/$USER /lustre/scratch/$USER

278

Franklin Job Launch Overview  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Job Launch Overview Job Launch Overview Job Launch Overview Overview and Basic Description Franklin has three basic types of nodes. Compute Nodes The 9,572 compute nodes each have a quad-core 2.3 GHz Opteron processor and 8 GB of memory shared by the 4 cores. The compute nodes run a restricted low-overhead operating system optimized for high performance computing. This OS supports only a limited number of system calls and UNIX commands, and does not officially support user-created dynamic-load libraries. A single given compute node is always allocated to run a single user job; multiple jobs never share a compute node. Service Nodes (Login Nodes) Franklin's service nodes run a full Linux operating system and provide support services for the system. Some of these service nodes serve

279

NERSC Job Logs and Analytics  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Queue Status Queue Wait Times Completed Batch Jobs Completed Parallel Jobs Usage Reports Benchmark Monitoring Training & Tutorials Software Accounts & Allocations Policies Data...

280

Finding a Job in Mathematics  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

General Job Hunting Tools and Online Sources (from Purdue Center for Career Opportunitie). They claim to have the Internet's largest list of job hunting sites.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "job safety analysis" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Documentation of Hanford Site independent review of the Hanford Waste Vitrification Plant Preliminary Safety Analysis Report. Revision 3  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC) is the Integrating Contractor for the Hanford Waste Vitrification Plant (HWVP) Project, and as such is responsible for preparation of the HWVP Preliminary Safety Analysis Report (PSAR). The HWVP PSAR was prepared pursuant to the requirements for safety analyses contained in US Department of Energy (DOE) Orders 4700.1, Project Management System (DOE 1987); 5480.5, Safety of Nuclear Facilities (DOE 1986a); 5481.lB, Safety Analysis and Review System (DOE 1986b) which was superseded by DOE order 5480-23, Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports, for nuclear facilities effective April 30, 1992 (DOE 1992); and 6430.lA, General Design Criteria (DOE 1989). The WHC procedures that, in large part, implement these DOE requirements are contained in WHC-CM-4-46, Nonreactor Facility Safety Analysis Manual. This manual describes the overall WHC safety analysis process in terms of requirements for safety analyses, responsibilities of the various contributing organizations, and required reviews and approvals.

Herborn, D.I.

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

282

CRAD, Facility Safety - Nuclear Facility Safety Basis | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CRAD, Facility Safety - Nuclear Facility Safety Basis CRAD, Facility Safety - Nuclear Facility Safety Basis CRAD, Facility Safety - Nuclear Facility Safety Basis A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) that can be used for assessment of a contractor's Nuclear Facility Safety Basis. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, Facility Safety - Nuclear Facility Safety Basis More Documents & Publications CRAD, Facility Safety - Unreviewed Safety Question Requirements Site Visit Report, Livermore Site Office - February 2011 FAQS Job Task Analyses - Nuclear Safety Specialist

283

Advanced Photon Source: XSD Jobs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

X-ray Science Division Jobs (last updated 10/31/2013) X-ray Science Division Jobs (last updated 10/31/2013) Current Openings: Structural Science (SRS) Group, Assistant Chemist-Term Surface Scattering & Microdiffraction (SSM) Group, Physicist Postdoctoral Openings: Time Resolved Research (TRR) Group ID Description #321422 Structural Science (SRS) Group, Assistant Chemist-Term Designs, develops and conducts research programs related to structural studies of materials using powder diffraction, and/or related methods such as pair-distribution-function (PDF) analysis. Performs collaborative research with beamline users and internal and external research scientists. Supports user experiments in the area of powder diffraction, principally at 17-BM and 11-BM, but also at other beamlines in the Structural Sciences group as needed. Recruits new external research groups to utilize the beamlines in the Structural Sciences group. #321096 Surface Scattering & Microdiffraction (SSM) Group, Physicist

284

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - NNSA for Safety and Health  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report As of December 31, 2011 Reporting Office: NNSA NA-SH Section One: Current Mission(s) of the Organization and Potential Changes The Office of the Associate Administrator for Safety and Health (NA-SH) provides mission enabling support to the NNSA Administrator, Central Technical Authority (CTA), Acquisition Executives, senior NNSA officials, program officers and site offices. NA-SH enables other NNSA organizations to fulfill NNSA missions while protecting the environment and safeguarding the safety and health of the public and the workforce. Section Two: SITE CHARACTERISTICS TABLE 1 Number of Hazard Category 1, 2, or 3 Nuclear Facilities: HC 1: 0; HC 2: 0; HC 3: 0 Number of Radiological Facilities

285

A probabilistic safety analysis of UF{sub 6} handling at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A probabilistic safety study of UF{sub 6} handling activities at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant has recently been completed. The analysis provides a unique perspective on the safety of UF{sub 6} handling activities. The estimated release frequencies provide an understanding of current risks, and the examination of individual contributors yields a ranking of important plant features and operations. Aside from the probabilistic results, however, there is an even more important benefit derived from a systematic modeling of all operations. The integrated approach employed in the analysis allows the interrelationships among the equipment and the required operations to be explored in depth. This paper summarizes the methods used in the study and provides an overview of some of the technical insights that were obtained. Specific areas of possible improvement in operations are described.

Boyd, G.J.; Lewis, S.R.; Summitt, R.L. [Safety and Reliability Optimization Services (SAROS), Inc., Knoxville, TN (United States)

1991-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

286

Laser Safety and Hazardous Analysis for the ARES (Big Sky) Laser System  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A laser safety and hazard analysis was performed for the ARES laser system based on the 2000 version of the American National Standards Institute's (ANSI) Standard Z136.1,for Safe Use of Lasers and the 2000 version of the ANSI Standard Z136.6, for Safe Use of Lasers Outdoors. The ARES laser system is a Van/Truck based mobile platform, which is used to perform laser interaction experiments and tests at various national test sites.

AUGUSTONI, ARNOLD L.

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

287

Safety analysis report for packaging, onsite, long-length contaminated equipment transport system  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This safety analysis report for packaging describes the components of the long-length contaminated equipment (LLCE) transport system (TS) and provides the analyses, evaluations, and associated operational controls necessary for the safe use of the LLCE TS on the Hanford Site. The LLCE TS will provide a standardized, comprehensive approach for the disposal of approximately 98% of LLCE scheduled to be removed from the 200 Area waste tanks.

McCormick, W.A.

1997-05-09T23:59:59.000Z

288

Jobs | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

About » Field Offices » FSO Home » About » About » Field Offices » FSO Home » About » Jobs Fermi Site Office (FSO) FSO Home About Organization Chart .pdf file (887KB) Jobs Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Fermi Site Office U.S. Department of Energy MS 118 P.O. Box 2000 Kirk Road and Pine Street Batavia, IL 60510 P: (630) 840-3281 F: (630) 840-3285 About Jobs Print Text Size: A A A Subscribe FeedbackShare Page Current Open Federal Positions The Fermi Site Office is located in Batavia, Illinois. All open federal positions listed below are posted on USAJobs.gov External link . (Fermi Site Office Organization Chart .pdf file (887KB)) Position Details Job Number Opened Closes No positions in FSO are currently open Important note: Please read job opportunity announcements carefully to identify the

289

Jobs | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

TJSO Home » About » TJSO Home » About » Jobs Thomas Jefferson Site Office (TJSO) TJSO Home About Organization Chart .pdf file (136KB) Jobs Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Thomas Jefferson Site Office U.S. Department of Energy 12000 Jefferson Avenue Newport News, VA 23606 P: (757) 269-7140 About Jobs Print Text Size: A A A Subscribe FeedbackShare Page Current Open Federal Positions The Thomas Jefferson Site Office is located in Newport News, Virginia. All open federal positions listed below are posted on USAJobs.gov External link . (Thomas Jefferson Site Office Organization Chart .pdf file (136KB)) Position Details Job Number Opened Closes No positions in TJSO are currently open Important note: Please read job opportunity announcements carefully to identify the

290

Jobs | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

PSO Home » About » PSO Home » About » Jobs Princeton Site Office (PSO) PSO Home About Organization Chart .pdf file (69KB) Jobs Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Contact Information Princeton Site Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 102 Princeton, NJ 08543 P: (609) 243-3700 F: (609) 243-2032 About Jobs Print Text Size: A A A Subscribe FeedbackShare Page Current Open Federal Positions The Princeton Site Office is located in Princeton, New Jersey. All open federal positions listed below are posted on USAJobs.gov External link . (Princeton Site Office Organization Chart .pdf file (69KB)) Position Details Job Number Opened Closes No positions in PSO are currently open Important note: Please read job opportunity announcements carefully to identify the

291

Jobs | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

BHSO Home » About » BHSO Home » About » Jobs Brookhaven Site Office (BHSO) BHSO Home About Organization Chart .pdf file (25KB) Jobs Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Brookhaven Site Office U.S. Department of Energy PO Box 5000 Upton, NY 11973 P: (631) 344-3425 E: TellDOE@bnl.gov About Jobs Print Text Size: A A A Subscribe FeedbackShare Page Current Open Federal Positions The Brookhaven Site Office is located in Upton, New York. All open federal positions listed below are posted on USAJobs.gov External link . (Brookhaven Site Office Organization Chart .pdf file (25KB)) Position Details Job Number Opened Closes No positions in BHSO are currently open Important note: Please read job opportunity announcements carefully to identify the

292

59Job Search Letters CHAPTER 4 JOB SEARCH LETTERS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

59Job Search Letters CHAPTER 4 JOB SEARCH LETTERS COVER LETTERS ARE AS IMPORTANT TO A TARGETED JOB you are seeking can make you look unfocused. If you are unwilling to take the time and energy resume and to invite you for an interview. Cover letters focus on either obtaining information as to job

Moore, Paul A.

293

Safety analysis of the CSTR-1 bench-scale coal liquefaction unit  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The objective of the program reported herein was to provide a Safety Analysis of the CSTR-1 bench scale unit located in Building 167 at the Pittsburgh Energy Technology Center. It was apparent that considerable effort was expended in the design and construction of the unit, and in the development of operating procedures, with regard to safety. Exhaust ventilation, H/sub 2/ and H/sub 2/S monitoring, overpressure protection, overtemperature protection, and interlock systems have been provided. Present settings on the pressure and temperature safety systems are too high, however, to insure prevention of vessel deformation or damage in all cases. While the occurrence of catastrophic rupture of a system pressure vessel (e.g., reactor, high pressure separators) is unlikely, the potential consequences to personnel are severe. Feasibility of providing shielding for these components should be considered. A more probable mode of vessel failure in the event of overpressure or overtemperature and failure of the safety system is yielding of the closure bolts followed by high pressure flow across the mating surfaces. As a minimum, shielding should be designed to restrict travel of resultant spray. The requirements for personal protective equipment are presently stated in rather broad and general terms in the operating procedures. Safe practices and procedures would be more assured if specific requirements were stated and included for each operational step. Recommendations were developed for all hazards triggered by the guidelines.

Hulburt, D.A.

1981-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

294

Jobs at the National Labs  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Search for jobs, internships and educational programs at the Department of Energy's National Laboratories.

295

JOB OPPORTUNITIES Breast imaging  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Genitourinary Radiology Head and Neck Radiology Musculoskeletal Radiology Neuroradiology Pediatric RadiologyJOB OPPORTUNITIES Breast imaging Chest Radiology Emergency Radiology Gastrointestinal Radiology Interventional Radiology Nuclear Radiology Radiation Oncology What Can I Do With a Major in... Radiological

Jiang, Huiqiang

296

Running Interactive Jobs on Carver  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Interactive Jobs Interactive Jobs Interactive Jobs Overview There are two types of interactive jobs. The first type runs on a login node. These applications are typically pre- and post-processing jobs, data management programs, or some other type of "tool". Note that it is not possible to run any MPI application on Carver login nodes. The second type of interactive job runs on one or more Carver compute nodes. Because the only way to gain access to the compute nodes is through the batch system, these types of jobs may more accurately be called "interactive batch" jobs. The remainder of this section focuses on these types of jobs. Usage Basic usage: carver% qsub -I The above command creates an interactive shell on a compute node, in the user's home directory. As a batch job, it has default values for batch

297

SAFETY ANALYSIS FOR TANK 241-AZ-101 MIXER PUMP PROCESS TEST  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document contains the completed safety analysis which establishes the safety envelope for performing the mixer pump process test in Tank 241-AZ-101. This process test is described in TF-210-OTP-001. All equipment necessary for the mixer pump test has been installed by Project W-151. The purpose of this document is to describe and analyze the mixer pump test for Aging Waste Facility (AWF) Tank 241-AZ-101 and to address the 'yes/maybe' responses marked for evaluation questions identified in Unreviewed Safety Question Evaluation (USQE) TF-94-0266. The scope of this document is limited to the performance of the mixer pump test for Tank 241-AZ-101. Unreviewed Safety Question Determination (USQD) TF-96-0018 verified that the installation of two mixer pumps into Tank 241-AZ-101 was within the current Tank Waste Remediation System (TWRS) Authorization Basis. USQDs TF-96-0461, TF-96-0448, and TF-96-0805 verified that the installation of the in-tank video camera, thermocouples, and Ultrasonic Interface Level Analyzer (URSILLA), respectively, were within the current TWRS Authorization Basis. USQD TF-96-1041 verified that the checkout testing of the installed equipment was within the current TWRS Authorization Basis. Installation of the pumps and equipment has been completed. An evaluation of safety considerations associated with operation of the mixer pumps for the mixer pump test is provided in this document. This document augments the existing AWF authorization basis as defined in the Interim Safety Basis (Stahl 1997), and as such, will use the existing Interim Operational Safety Requirements (IOSRs) of Heubach 1996 to adequately control the mixer pump test. The hazard and accident analysis is limited to the scope and impact of the mixer pump test, and therefore does not address hazards already addressed by the current AWF authorization basis. This document does not evaluate removal of the mixer pumps. Safety considerations for removal of the pumps will be addressed by separate safety documentation once that portion of the mission is defined. The mixer pump test has been evaluated to cover the use of either the existing ventilation system (241-A-702) or the ventilation system upgrade provided by Project W-030. Analysis of Project W-030 is outside of the scope of this document and is addressed in HNF-SD-WM-SARR-039 (Draft) which, should the W-030 system be in service at the time of the mixer pump test, will have been approved and made a part of the TWRS authorization basis. The test will use two high-capacity mixer pumps in various configurations and modes to demonstrate solids mobilization of waste in Tank 241-AZ-101. The information and experience gained during the test will provide data for comparison with sludge mobilization prediction models; provide data to estimate the number, location, and cycle times of the mixer pumps; and provide indication of the effects of mixer pump operation on the AWF tank systems and components. The slurry produced will be evaluated for future pretreatment processing. This process test does not transfer waste from the tank; the waste is mixed and confined within the existing system. At the completion of the mixer pump test, the mixer pumps will be stopped and normal tank operations, maintenance, and surveillance will continue. Periodic rotation of the mixer pumps and motor shafts, along with bearing greasing, is required to maintain the pumps following the mixer pump test.

HAMMOND DM; HARRIS JP; MOUETTE P

1997-06-09T23:59:59.000Z

298

Organic Tanks Safety Program: Advanced organic analysis FY 1996 progress report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Major focus during the first part of FY96 was to evaluate using organic functional group concentrations to screen for energetics. Fourier transform infrared and Raman spectroscopy would be useful screening tools for determining C-H and COO- organic content in tank wastes analyzed in a hot cell. These techniques would be used for identifying tanks of potential safety concern that may require further analysis. Samples from Tanks 241-C-106 and -C-204 were analyzed; the major organic in C-106 was B2EHPA and in C-204 was TBP. Analyses of simulated wastes were also performed for the Waste Aging Studies Task; organics formed as a result of degradation were identified, and the original starting components were monitored quantitatively. Sample analysis is not routine and required considerable methods adaptation and optimization. Several techniques have been evaluated for directly analyzing chelator and chelator fragments in tank wastes: matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection using Cu complexation. Although not directly funded by the Tanks Safety Program, the success of these techniques have implications for both the Flammable Gas and Organic Tanks Safety Programs.

NONE

1996-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

299

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - NNSA for Safety and Health  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report as of December 31, 2012 Reporting Office: NNSA NA-SH Section 1: Current Mission(s) of the Organization and Potential Changes The Office of the Associate Administrator for Safety and Health (NA-SH) provides mission enabling support to the NNSA Administrator, Central Technical Authority (CTA), Acquisition Executives, senior NNSA officials, program officers and site offices. NA-SH enables other NNSA organizations to fulfill NNSA missions while protecting the environment and safeguarding the safety and health of the public and the workforce. Section 2: SITE CHARACTERISTICS TABLE 1 Number of Hazard Category 1, 2, or 3 Nuclear Facilities: HC 1:_0_; HC 2: _0_; HC 3: _0_. Number of Radiological Facilities

300

CACI: The Cesium-137 Agricultural Commodities Irradiator. Final design report: Volume 7, Safety analysis, thermal analysis, and thermal testing  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report provides a complete description of the final detailed design of the Cesium-137 Agricultural Commodities Irradiator (CACI). The design was developed and successfully completed by the Rocketdyne Division of Rockwell International for the US Department of Energy (DOE). The CACI project was initiated in April 1985 under DOE`s Byproducts Utilization Program, with the objectives of transferring food irradiation technology to the industry and thereby demonstrating a beneficial use for the 137 Cs nuclear by-product isotope. As designed, CACI will meet the intended requirements for research, development, and demonstration of irradiation processing of food. Further, as shown in the safety analyses performed during the project, the design conforms to all the safety and licensing requirements set forth for the project. The original scope of the CACI project included completion of its construction. However, the project was terminated for the convenience of the government during the final design phase in February 1986 for lack of a specific site. The CACI final design is described in eight volumes. This volume, Volume VII, describes Safety Analysis, Thermal Analysis, and Thermal Testing.

Not Available

1986-12-19T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "job safety analysis" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Reliability analysis of safety grade decay heat removal system of Indian prototype fast breeder reactor  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The 500 MW Indian pool type Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR), is provided with two independent and diverse Decay Heat Removal (DHR) systems viz., Operating Grade Decay Heat Removal System (OGDHRS) and Safety Grade Decay Heat Removal System (SGDHRS). OGDHRS utilizes the secondary sodium loops and Steam–Water System with special decay heat removal condensers for DHR function. The unreliability of this system is of the order of 0.1–0.01. The safety requirements of the present generation of fast reactors are very high, and specifically for DHR function the failure frequency should be less than ?1E-7/ry. Therefore, a passive SGDHR system using four completely independent thermo-siphon loops in natural convection mode is provided to ensure adequate core cooling for all Design Basis Events. The very high reliability requirement for DHR function is achieved mainly with the help of SGDHRS. This paper presents the reliability analysis of SGDHR system. Analysis is performed by Fault Tree method using ‘CRAFT’ software developed at Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research. This software has special features for compact representation and CCF analysis of high redundancy safety systems encountered in nuclear reactors. Common Cause Failures (CCF) are evaluated by ? factor method. The reliability target for SGDHRS arrived from DHR reliability requirement and the ultimate number of demands per year (7/y) on SGDHRS is that the failure frequency should be ?1.4E-8/de. Since it is found from the analysis that the unreliability of SGDHRS with identical loops is 5.2E-6/de and dominated by leak rates of components like AHX, DHX and sodium dump and isolation valves, options with diversity measures in important components were studied. The failure probability of SGDHRS for a design consisting of 2 types of diverse loops (Diverse AHX, DHX and sodium dump and isolation valves) is 2.1E-8/de, which practically meets the reliability requirement.

A. John Arul; C. Senthil Kumar; S. Athmalingam; Om Pal Singh; K. Suryaprakasa Rao

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

302

Electrical Safety Occurrences | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Electrical Safety Occurrences Electrical Safety Occurrences June 26, 2014 Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences - April 2013 An analysis of the Occurrence Reporting and...

303

Electrical Safety Occurrences | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Electrical Safety Occurrences Electrical Safety Occurrences September 20, 2011 Monthly Analysis of Electrical Safety Occurrences - August 2011 An analysis of the Occurrence...

304

FAQS Qualification Card – Occupational Safety  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A key element for the Department’s Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA).

305

Monitoring and Managing PDSF Jobs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Monitoring and Managing Jobs Monitoring and Managing Jobs Monitoring and Managing Jobs Action How to do it Comment Get a summary of all batch jobs sgeusers Shows a tally of all jobs for all users including their states. This is a script that parses the output of qstat and is maintained by PDSF staff (located in /common/usg/bin). Do "sgeusers -h" for usage info. Get a listing of your jobs and their states qstat -u user_name If you skip the -u option, you'll get all the jobs on PDSF. qstat_long -u user_name Regular qstat truncates job names to 10 characters. If you need a full name - use qstat_long. Get detailed info about a specific job qstat -j job_ID You can get job_ID by listing your jobs as described above. See how much cputime a job has used qstat -j job_ID Look in the next to the last line or grep the output on "usage". Note that in the memory usage GBs stands for Gigabyte-seconds.

306

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Construction Management | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Construction Management FAQS Job Task Analyses - Construction Management FAQS Job Task Analyses are performed on the Function Area Qualification Standards. The FAQS Job Task...

307

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Environmental Restoration | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environmental Restoration FAQS Job Task Analyses - Environmental Restoration FAQS Job Task Analyses are performed on the Function Area Qualification Standards. The FAQS Job Task...

308

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Facility Representative | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Facility Representative FAQS Job Task Analyses - Facility Representative FAQS Job Task Analyses are performed on the Function Area Qualification Standards. The FAQS Job Task...

309

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Environmental Compliance | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environmental Compliance FAQS Job Task Analyses - Environmental Compliance FAQS Job Task Analyses are performed on the Function Area Qualification Standards. The FAQS Job Task...

310

CERCA LEU fuel assemblies testing in Maria Reactor - safety analysis summary and testing program scope.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The presented paper contains neutronic and thermal-hydraulic (for steady and unsteady states) calculation results prepared to support annex to Safety Analysis Report for MARIA reactor in order to obtain approval for program of testing low-enriched uranium (LEU) lead test fuel assemblies (LTFA) manufactured by CERCA. This includes presentation of the limits and operational constraints to be in effect during the fuel testing investigations. Also, the scope of testing program (which began in August 2009), including additional measurements and monitoring procedures, is described.

Pytel, K.; Mieleszczenko, W.; Lechniak, J.; Moldysz, A.; Andrzejewski, K.; Kulikowska, T.; Marcinkowska, A.; Garner, P. L.; Hanan, N. A.; Nuclear Engineering Division; Institute of Atomic Energy (Poland)

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

311

PDSF Interactive Batch Jobs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Interactive Batch Jobs Interactive Batch Jobs Running Interactive Batch Jobs You cannot login to the PDSF batch nodes directly but you can run an interactive session on a batch node using either qlogin or qsh. This can be useful if you are doing something that is potentially disruptive or if the interactive nodes are overloaded. qlogin will give you an interactive session in the same window as your original session on PDSF, however, you must have your ssh keys in place. Due to system limitations there is a small (but important) difference in the user environment you get when you use qlogin. When you receive a shell prompt with qlogin, your CHOS environment is not set up for you. In order to set up the CHOS environment of your choice you will need to manually chos into the chos environment of your choice:

312

Job Counting Guidelines  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environmental Management Environmental Management Definitions and Guidelines for Counting Monthly and Quarterly EM Recovery Act Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) and Cumulative Head-Count The following updated definitions and guidelines are intended to provide EM Recovery Act sites with information to collect and report timely and accurate full-time equivalent and cumulative head-count data for both monthly and quarterly jobs data calls. These revised guidelines supersede the previous monthly jobs data reporting definitions and guidelines dated February 9, 2010. These revised guidelines remain consistent with OMB guidance issued December 18, 2009 and cover subcontractors and vendors as well as prime

313

PiPe dreams? Jobs Gained, Jobs Lost  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Petroleum Institute that, if constructed, TransCanada's proposed Keystone XL (KXL) pipeline will generatePiPe dreams? Jobs Gained, Jobs Lost by the ConstruCtion of Keystone XL a rePort by Corne, and Induced) Jobs from Keystone XL 26 KXL Will Have Minor Impact on Unemployment Levels 27 Four Ways Keystone

Danforth, Bryan Nicholas

314

Safety Bulletin  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Bulletin Bulletin Offtce 01 Health. Safety and Sa<:urtty Events Beyond Design Safety Basis Analysis No. 2011-01 PURPOSE This Safety Alert provides information on a safety concern related to the identification and mitigation of events that may fall outside those analyzed in the documented safety analysis. BACKGROUND On March 11 , 2011 , the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station in Japan was damaged by a magnitude 9.0 earthquake and the subsequent tsunami. While there is still a lot to be learned from the accident · about the adequacy of design specifications and the equipment failure modes, reports from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) have identified some key aspects of the operational emergency at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station.

315

Microsoft Word - 20130423 AMF2_MAGIC_Safety_Appendix_for_Web...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

at anchor, in shipyard or alongside a pier. 8.12 Footwear Appropriate footwear (work boots with non-slip soles, safety toes, as required) shall be worn for the job and job...

316

Submitting Batch Jobs on Carver  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Submitting Batch Jobs Submitting Batch Jobs Submitting Batch Jobs Overview A batch job is the most common way users run production applications on NERSC machines. Carver's batch system is based on the PBS model, implemented with the Moab scheduler and Torque resource manager. Typically, the user submits a batch script to the batch system. This script specifies, at the very least, how many nodes and cores the job will use, how long the job will run, and the name of the application to run. The job will advance in the queue until it has reached the top. At this point, Torque will allocate the requested number of nodes to the batch job. The batch script itself will execute on the "head node" (sometimes known as the "MOM" node). See Queues and Policies for details of batch queues, limits,

317

Expanded Pending Jobs by Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Expanded Pending Jobs by Group Expanded Pending Jobs by Group Daily Graph: Weekly Graph: Monthly Graph: Yearly Graph: 2 Year Graph: Last edited: 2011-04-05 14:00:25...

318

Find Jobs | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

range of fields. This section can help you familiarize yourself with different types of green energy jobs as you begin your search for a job that meets your interests and skills....

319

Los Alamos National Laboratory corregated metal pipe saw facility preliminary safety analysis report. Volume I  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Preliminary Safety Analysis Report addresses site assessment, facility design and construction, and design operation of the processing systems in the Corrugated Metal Pipe Saw Facility with respect to normal and abnormal conditions. Potential hazards are identified, credible accidents relative to the operation of the facility and the process systems are analyzed, and the consequences of postulated accidents are presented. The risk associated with normal operations, abnormal operations, and natural phenomena are analyzed. The accident analysis presented shows that the impact of the facility will be acceptable for all foreseeable normal and abnormal conditions of operation. Specifically, under normal conditions the facility will have impacts within the limits posted by applicable DOE guidelines, and in accident conditions the facility will similarly meet or exceed the requirements of all applicable standards. 16 figs., 6 tabs.

NONE

1990-09-19T23:59:59.000Z

320

Nebraska Customized Job Training Advantage (Nebraska)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Nebraska Customized Job Training Advantage is a flexible job training program with grants from $800-$4000 per qualified new job. Additional grant funding may be available for jobs created in...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "job safety analysis" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

EPA Environmental Workforce Development and Job Training Grants  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is accepting applications to deliver environmental workforce development and job training programs that recruit, train, and place local, unemployed and under-employed residents with the skills needed to secure full-time employment in the environmental field, with a focus on solid and hazardous waste remediation, environmental health and safety, and wastewater-related training.

322

Safety Analysis and Certification of Open Distributed Systems P. M. Conmy; Department of Computer Science, University of York, York, YO10 5DD U.K.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Safety Analysis and Certification of Open Distributed Systems P. M. Conmy; Department of Computer to the safety analysis and certification of avionics computer systems. At present aircraft computing systems are to the way avionics computer systems are analysed and certified. At present analysis techniques are based

Nicholson, Mark

323

ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE of MEDICINE of YESHIVA UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT of ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH and SAFETY  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

EQUIPMENT Yes No N/A Hard hat Gloves Safety Glasses Work Shoes Knee Pads Hearing Protectors Respirator Face and SAFETY HEALTH and SAFETY CONSTRUCTION SAFETY AUDIT FORM Job Location: Field Supervisor: Safety Officer Performing Audit: Scope of Project: Has area been cleared by Safety: Yes No N/A Date: PERSONAL PROTECTIVE

Emmons, Scott

324

Guidance on health effects of toxic chemicals. Safety Analysis Report Update Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. (MMES), and Martin Marietta Utility Services, Inc. (MMUS), are engaged in phased programs to update the safety documentation for the existing US Department of Energy (DOE)-owned facilities. The safety analysis of potential toxic hazards requires a methodology for evaluating human health effects of predicted toxic exposures. This report provides a consistent set of health effects and documents toxicity estimates corresponding to these health effects for some of the more important chemicals found within MMES and MMUS. The estimates are based on published toxicity information and apply to acute exposures for an ``average`` individual. The health effects (toxicological endpoints) used in this report are (1) the detection threshold; (2) the no-observed adverse effect level; (3) the onset of irritation/reversible effects; (4) the onset of irreversible effects; and (5) a lethal exposure, defined to be the 50% lethal level. An irreversible effect is defined as a significant effect on a person`s quality of life, e.g., serious injury. Predicted consequences are evaluated on the basis of concentration and exposure time.

Foust, C.B.; Griffin, G.D.; Munro, N.B.; Socolof, M.L.

1994-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

325

September 26, 2011, Department letter transmitting the Implementation Plan for Board Recommendation 2010-1, Safety Analysis Requirements for Defining Adequate Protection for the Public and the Workers.  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

September 26, 2011 September 26, 2011 The Honorable Peter S. Winokur Chairman Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 625 Indiana Avenue, NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC 20004-2941 Dear Mr. Chairman: Enclosed is the Department of Energy's Implementation Plan for Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2010-1, Safety Analysis Requirements for Defining Adequate Protection for the Public and the Workers. This Plan provides the Department's approach for updating its Documented Safety Analysis Standards and requirements to clarify them in regards to performance of hazard and accident analysis and the identification of safety controls. I have assigned Dr. James B. O'Brien, Acting Director, Office of Nuclear Safety in the Office of Health, Safety and Security, as the Department's Responsible

326

Submitting Batch Jobs on Franklin  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Submitting Batch Jobs Submitting Batch Jobs Submitting Batch Jobs Debug Jobs Short jobs requesting less than 30 minutes and requiring 512 nodes (2,048 cores) or fewer can run in the debug queue. From 5am-6pm Pacific Time, 256 nodes are reserved for debugging and interactive use. See also, running Interactive Jobs. Sample Batch Scripts The following batch script requests 8 cores on 2 nodes with a 10 minute wall clock limit in the debug queue. Torque directive lines tell the batch system how to run a job and begin with #PBS. #PBS -q debug #PBS -l mppwidth=8 #PBS -l walltime=00:10:00 #PBS -j eo #PBS -V cd $PBS_O_WORKDIR aprun -n 8 ./a.out Here is another example requesting 8 processors using 4 nodes with only 2 cores per node: #PBS -q debug #PBS -l mppwidth=8 #PBS -l mppnppn=2 #PBS -l walltime=00:10:00

327

Running Interactive Jobs on Franklin  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Interactive Jobs Interactive Jobs Interactive Jobs Serial Code or Commands Franklin is a massively parallel high-performance computing platform and is intended and designed to run large parallel codes. While it is possible to run serial jobs on Franklin, it is discouraged. Any code or command that is not preceeded by the aprun command will execute serially on a service (usually login) node. The login nodes are for executing general UNIX shell commands, building code, and submitting jobs intended to run on the compute nodes. The service nodes are shared by many users, so. please do not run your compute- or memory-intensive jobs on these nodes. NERSC may kill running processes that severely degrade service node performance. If your job will run for more than 5 minutes, or use more than 1 GB of memory it should not

328

Running Interactive Jobs on Edison  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Interactive Jobs Interactive Jobs Interactive Jobs To run an interactive job on Edison's compute nodes you must request the number of nodes you want and have the system allocate resources from the pool of free nodes. The following command requests 2 nodes using the debug queue. edison% qsub -I -V -q debug -l mppwidth=48 The -I flag specifies an interactive job. The -V flag passes your current environment variable settings to the compute environment. The -q flag specifies the name of the queue and -l mppwidth determines the number of nodes to allocate for your job, but not as you might expect. The number of nodes given to your job (remember, the system allocates nodes, not cores), is the value of mppwidth divided by the number of cores per node. On Edison, with 24 cores per node, the number of nodes is mppwidth/24 plus one

329

Running Interactive Jobs on Hopper  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Interactive Jobs Interactive Jobs Interactive Jobs To run an interactive job on Hopper's compute nodes you must request the number of nodes you want and have the system allocate resources from the pool of free nodes. The following command requests 2 nodes using the interactive queue. hopper% qsub -I -V -q interactive -l mppwidth=48 The -I flag specifies an interactive job. The -V flag passes your current environment variable settings to the compute environment. The -q flag specifies the name of the queue and -l mppwidth determines the number of nodes to allocate for your job, but not as you might expect. The number of nodes given to your job (remember, the system allocates nodes, not cores), is the value of mppwidth divided by the umber of cores per node. On Hopper, with 24 cores per node, the number of nodes is mppwidth/24 plus one more if

330

Running Interactive Jobs on Edison  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Interactive Jobs Interactive Jobs Interactive Jobs To run an interactive job on Edison's compute nodes you must request the number of nodes you want and have the system allocate resources from the pool of free nodes. The following command requests 2 nodes using the debug queue. edison% qsub -I -V -q debug -l mppwidth=32 The -I flag specifies an interactive job. The -V flag passes your current environment variable settings to the compute environment. The -q flag specifies the name of the queue and -l mppwidth determines the number of nodes to allocate for your job, but not as you might expect. The number of nodes given to your job (remember, the system allocates nodes, not cores), is the value of mppwidth divided by the number of cores per node. On Edison, with 16 cores per node, the number of nodes is mppwidth/16 plus one

331

US ITER | Jobs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Frank Casella US ITER Quality Assurance, Environmental, Safety and Health and Licensing Support Manager Tell us about your background Frank Casella Frank Casella I was born in...

332

Accident safety analysis for 300 Area N Reactor Fuel Fabrication and Storage Facility  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of the accident safety analysis is to identify and analyze a range of credible events, their cause and consequences, and to provide technical justification for the conclusion that uranium billets, fuel assemblies, uranium scrap, and chips and fines drums can be safely stored in the 300 Area N Reactor Fuel Fabrication and Storage Facility, the contaminated equipment, High-Efficiency Air Particulate filters, ductwork, stacks, sewers and sumps can be cleaned (decontaminated) and/or removed, the new concretion process in the 304 Building will be able to operate, without undue risk to the public, employees, or the environment, and limited fuel handling and packaging associated with removal of stored uranium is acceptable.

Johnson, D.J.; Brehm, J.R.

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

333

Parametric Analysis of PWR Spent Fuel Depletion Parameters for Long-Term-Disposal Criticality Safety  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Utilization of burnup credit in criticality safety analysis for long-term disposal of spent nuclear fuel allows improved design efficiency and reduced cost due to the large mass of fissile material that will be present in the repository. Burnup-credit calculations are based on depletion calculations that provide a conservative estimate of spent fuel contents (in terms of criticality potential), followed by criticality calculations to assess the value of the effective neutron multiplication factor (k(sub)eff) for the a spent fuel cask or a fuel configuration under a variety of probabilistically derived events. In order to ensure that the depletion calculation is conservative, it is necessary to both qualify and quantify assumptions that can be made in depletion models.

DeHart, M.D.

1999-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

334

American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (released in AEO2005)  

Reports and Publications (EIA)

The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 was signed into law on October 22, 2004. Most of the 650 pages of the Act are related to tax legislation. Provisions pertaining to energy are detailed in this analysis.

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

335

For Job Seekers  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Collage of researchers doing experiments, viewing laptop, LBNL building Collage of researchers doing experiments, viewing laptop, LBNL building For Job Seekers How to find opportunities in energy and environmental careers. First, read our "What is Energy Efficiency?" page, especially, "Who Does Energy Efficiency?" You'll discover that people in many different occupations can have some type of involvement working toward a more energy-efficient world. Job Listings in Research and Development, and Higher Education The links on this page jump to a variety of energy-related employers. They include institutions doing research in energy such as the Department of Energy's National Laboratories, and universties, as well as private sector companies in energy-related services, such as consulting firms and utilities.

336

Usage by Job Size  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Usage by Job Usage by Job Size Table Usage by Job Size Table page loading animation Usage Query Interface System All Hopper Edison Carver Planck Matgen Franklin Hopper 1 Magellan Dirac Bassi Jacquard Seaborg User Account (Repo) Execution Queue All Debug Interactive Premium Regular Short Regular Long Regular Small Regular Medium Regular Big Regular Extra Big Killable Low Transfer IO Task Special System Serial Big Memory Westmere === Inactive === Magellan Serial Magellan Short Magellan Small Magellan Medium Magellan Big Magellan Long Regular 1 Regular 1 Long Regular 16 Regular 32 Regular 48 Full Config Seaborg Serial Batch 16 Batch 32 Batch 64 Submit Queue all interactive debug premium regular low DOE Office all ASCR BER BES FES HEP NP Summary for jobs that completed after Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 @ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 : 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59

337

Low Carbon Jobs in an Interconnected World | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Jobs in an Interconnected World Jobs in an Interconnected World Jump to: navigation, search Name Low Carbon Jobs in an Interconnected World Agency/Company /Organization Global Climate Network Partner Institute for Public Policy Research Sector Energy Focus Area Energy Efficiency, Renewable Energy Topics Co-benefits assessment, Background analysis Website http://www.ippr.org.uk/publica Country Australia, Brazil, China, Germany, India, Nigeria, South Africa, United Kingdom, United States Australia and New Zealand, South America, Eastern Asia, Western Europe, Southern Asia, Western Africa, Southern Africa, Northern Europe, Northern America References Low Carbon Jobs in an Interconnected World[1] Low Carbon Jobs in an Interconnected World Author: Global Climate Network Price: Free Publication Date: 30 March 2010

338

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach Webinar: Jobs and Economic Development  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach Webinar: Jobs and Economic Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach Webinar: Jobs and Economic Development Impacts of Offshore Wind Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach Webinar: Jobs and Economic Development Impacts of Offshore Wind November 20, 2013 3:00PM EST Online Starting more than a year ago, NREL initiated work to expand the Jobs and Economic Development Impacts (JEDI) model to include fixed-bottom offshore wind technology. Following the completion of the model (and in partnership with the DOE Wind Program, Illinois State University, and James Madison University), NREL supported the analysis of the regional jobs and economic impacts of offshore wind for the Great Lakes, Mid-Atlantic, Southeast, and Gulf Coast regions. The November Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach webinar will provide an overview of the new offshore wind JEDI model and

339

Letter from Nuclear Energy Institute regarding Integrated Safety Analysis: Why it is Appropropriate for Fuel Recycling Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

082 l F: 202.533.0166 l rxm@nei.org l www.nei.org 082 l F: 202.533.0166 l rxm@nei.org l www.nei.org Rod McCullum DIRECTOR FUEL CYCLE PROJECTS NUCLEAR GENERATION DIVISION September 10, 2010 Ms. Catherine Haney Director Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Subject: Integrated Safety Analysis: Why It Is Appropriate for Fuel Recycling Facilities Project Number: 689 Dear Ms. Haney: Enclosed for your review is a Nuclear Energy Institute white paper on the use of Integrated Safety Analysis (ISA) at U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission-licensed recycling facilities. This paper is intended as an information source for the NRC and should serve as a foundation for discussion with industry representatives on the issue.

340

Integrated Safety Management  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

ISM Day: March 10, 2010 ISM Day: March 10, 2010 ISM Day: June 6, 2008 Integrated Safety Management (ISM) Seven Principles of ISM Five Functions of ISM "Define the Scope of Work" Is the work clearly defined? Authorized? Do I know how to do the job? Do I have the proper equipment? Support? Have there been problems with tasks like this? "Analyze the Hazards" What are the hazards of the job? What can go wrong? Has the job been reviewed by a qualified person? "Develop Hazard Controls" Are all the necessary controls in place? (LOTO, PPE, Procedures etc.) Do I know what the controls are, and how to use them? What if something unexpected goes wrong? "Perform Work" Has the system responded as expected? How do I know? When will I call for assistance or stop work?

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "job safety analysis" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

The Front Lines of Patient Safety  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

patient safety · Incident Reporting · Root Cause Analysis · FMEA · Culture of Patient Safety Survey

Soloveichik, David

342

Fuel-Coolant-Interaction modeling and analysis work for the High Flux Isotope Reactor Safety Analysis Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A brief historical background and a description of short- and long-term task plan development for effective closure of this important safety issue for the HFIR are given. Short-term aspects deal with Fuel-Coolant-Interaction (FCI) issues experimentation, modeling, and analysis for the flow-blockage-induced steam explosion events in direct support of the SAR. Long-term aspects deal with addressing FCI issues resulting from other accidents in conjunction with issues dealing with aluminum ignition, which can result in an order of magnitude increase in overall energetics. Problem formulation, modeling, and computer code simulation for the various phases of steam explosions are described. The evaluation of core melt initiation propagation, and melt superheat are described. Core melt initiation and propagation have been studied using simple conservative models as well as from modeling and analysis using RELAP5. Core debris coolability, heatup, and melting/freezing aspects have been studied by use of the two-dimensional melting/freezing analysis code 2DKO, which was also benchmarked with MELCOR code predictions. Descriptions are provided for the HM, BH, FCIMOD, and CTH computer codes that have been implemented for studying steam explosion energetics from the standpoint of evaluating bounding loads by thermodynamic models or best-estimate loads from one- and two-dimensional simulations of steam explosion energetics. Vessel failure modeling and analysis was conducted using the principles of probabilistic fracture mechanics in conjunction with ADINA code calculations. Top head bolts failure modeling has also been conducted where the failure criterion was based upon stresses in the bolts exceeding the material yield stress for a given time duration. Missile transport modeling and analysis was conducted by setting up a one-dimensional mathematical model that accounts for viscous dissipation, virtual mass effects, and material inertia.

Taleyarkhan, R.P.; Georgevich, V.; Nestor, C.W.; Chang, S.J.; Freels, J.; Gat, U.; Lepard, B.L.; Gwaltney, R.C.; Luttrell, C.; Kirkpatrick, J.

1993-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

343

Current Jobs | Argonne National Laboratory  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Job Openings Argonne National Laboratory is currently hiring Co-op students in the following areas: Facilities Management and Services Division: The Facilities Management and...

344

Science Jobs and Energy Careers  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

facility, which performs work involving national security. Therefore, many of the jobs require U.S. citizenship, Applicants selected for employment will be subject to a...

345

Sandia National Laboratories: Job Listing  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Internship Opportunities - Apply by January 10, 2014 On December 4, 2013, in CRF, Energy, Facilities, Job Listing, News, News & Events, Office of Science, Research &...

346

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 99-03: Limitation of 10 CFR Part 830 to Equipment Referenced in the Safety Analysis Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Recently this Office received a reply to a Preliminary Notice of Violation (PNOV), although not denying any facts or conclusions in the PNOV and agreeing to pay the full imposed Civil Penalty, included arguments that some of the equipment cited in the PNOV was not, in their view, subject to the requirements of Part 830. The contractor argued that only equipment referenced in the Safety Analysis Report (SAR), Technical Safety Requirements (TSR) or Technical Specifications should come under the requirements of Part 830. The attached is DOE’s response to denying that argument.

347

JOBS FC 1.0 (JOBS and economic impacts of Fuel Cells) | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

JOBS FC 1.0 (JOBS and economic impacts of Fuel Cells) JOBS FC 1.0 (JOBS and economic impacts of Fuel Cells) Presentation slides from the May 22, 2012, Fuel Cell Technologies...

348

JOBS FC 1.1 (JOBS and economic impacts of Fuel Cells) | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

JOBS FC 1.1 (JOBS and economic impacts of Fuel Cells) JOBS FC 1.1 (JOBS and economic impacts of Fuel Cells) Presentation slides from the Fuel Cell Technologies Program webinar "DOE...

349

Safety analysis for tank 241-AZ-101 mixer pump process test  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document establishes the safety envelope for Project W-151,the process test of two mixer pumps in AWF waste tank 241-AZ-101.

Milliken, N.J., Westinghouse Hanford

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

350

Facility Safety  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

Establishes facility safety requirements related to: nuclear safety design, criticality safety, fire protection and natural phenomena hazards mitigation.

1996-10-24T23:59:59.000Z

351

Facility Safety  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

Establishes facility safety requirements related to: nuclear safety design, criticality safety, fire protection and natural phenomena hazards mitigation.

1995-11-16T23:59:59.000Z

352

FCT Safety, Codes and Standards: H2 Safety Snapshot Newsletter  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

H2 Safety Snapshot H2 Safety Snapshot Newsletter to someone by E-mail Share FCT Safety, Codes and Standards: H2 Safety Snapshot Newsletter on Facebook Tweet about FCT Safety, Codes and Standards: H2 Safety Snapshot Newsletter on Twitter Bookmark FCT Safety, Codes and Standards: H2 Safety Snapshot Newsletter on Google Bookmark FCT Safety, Codes and Standards: H2 Safety Snapshot Newsletter on Delicious Rank FCT Safety, Codes and Standards: H2 Safety Snapshot Newsletter on Digg Find More places to share FCT Safety, Codes and Standards: H2 Safety Snapshot Newsletter on AddThis.com... Home Basics Current Approaches to Safety, Codes & Standards DOE Activities Quick Links Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Delivery Hydrogen Storage Fuel Cells Technology Validation Manufacturing Education Systems Analysis

353

Nuclear Engineer (Criticality Safety)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This position is located in the Nuclear Safety Division (NSD) which has specific responsibility for managing the development, analysis, review, and approval of non-reactor nuclear facility safety...

354

Uncertainty analysis of criticality safety for the plate type fuel assembly storage rack  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

To evaluate the criticality safety of the fresh and the spent fuel storage racks in an open pool type research reactor designed by KAERI, the upper subcriticality limit (USL) analysis was carried out. First, the bias and its uncertainty of MCNP code system with ENDF/B-VII library were evaluated using the calculation results of the 183 benchmark experiments. The criticality calculations for the fuel storage rack are carried out under a normal state, an increased water temperature, a fuel assembly drop, and an eccentric insertion which can affect the criticality. Considering biases and uncertainties for the MCNP code system, abnormal conditions, and the manufacturing tolerance of the cell tube thickness, the USL value that can guarantee sufficient subcriticality is determined. It was found that the criticality of the fresh and the spent fuel storage racks currently designed satisfy the USL condition. Additionally, it was concluded that the pitch size of a fresh fuel storage rack can be reduced for efficient space availability, and even under a worst case in which the fresh storage rack is surrounded by a lower water density and the smallest pitch size satisfies the USL conditions.

Tae Young Han; Chang Je Park; Byung Chul Lee; Jae Man Noh

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

355

Submersion Criticality Safety Analysis of Tungsten-Based Fuel for Nuclear Power and Propulsion Applications  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Center for Space Nuclear Research (CSNR) is developing tungsten-encapsulated fuels for space nuclear applications. Aims to develop NTP fuels that are; Affordable Low impact on production and testing environment Producible on a large scale over suitable time period Higher-performance compared to previous graphite NTP fuel elements Space nuclear reactors remain subcritical before and during launch, and do not go critical until required by its mission. A properly designed reactor will remain subcritical in any launch abort scenario, where the reactor falls back to Earth and becomes submerged in terrestrial material. Submersion increases neutron reflection and thermalizes the neutrons, which typically increases the reactivity of the core. This effect is usually very significant for fast-spectrum reactors. This research provided a submersion criticality safety analysis for a representative tungsten/uranium oxide fueled reactor. Determine the submersion behavior of a reactor fueled by tungsten-based fuel. Considered fuel compositions with varying: Rhenium content (wt% rhenium in tungsten) Fuel loading fractions (UO2 vol%)

A.E. Craft; R. C. O'Brien; S. D. Howe; J. C. King

2014-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

356

Safety analysis report for the TRUPACT-II shipping package (condensed version). Volume 2, Rev. 14  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This appendix determines the effective G values for payload shipping categories of contact handled transuranic (CH-TRU) waste materials, based on the radiolytic G values for waste materials that are discussed in detail in Appendix 3.6.8 of the Safety Analysis Report for the TRUPACT-II Shipping Package. The effective G values take into account self-absorption of alpha decay energy inside particulate contamination and the fraction of energy absorbed by nongas-generating materials. As described in Appendix 3.6.8, an effective G value, G{sub eff}, is defined by: G{sub eff} - {Sigma}{sub M} (F{sub M} x G{sub M}) F{sub M}-fraction of energy absorbed by material maximum G value for a material where the sum is over all materials present inside a waste container. The G value itself is determined primarily by the chemical properties of the material and its temperature. The value of F is determined primarily by the size of the particles containing the radionuclides, the distribution of radioactivity on the various materials present inside the waste container, and the stopping distance of alpha particles in air, in the waste materials, or in the waste packaging materials.

NONE

1994-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

357

Advanced organic analysis and analytical methods development: FY 1995 progress report. Waste Tank Organic Safety Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes the work performed during FY 1995 by Pacific Northwest Laboratory in developing and optimizing analysis techniques for identifying organics present in Hanford waste tanks. The main focus was to provide a means for rapidly obtaining the most useful information concerning the organics present in tank waste, with minimal sample handling and with minimal waste generation. One major focus has been to optimize analytical methods for organic speciation. Select methods, such as atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry, were developed to increase the speciation capabilities, while minimizing sample handling. A capillary electrophoresis method was developed to improve separation capabilities while minimizing additional waste generation. In addition, considerable emphasis has been placed on developing a rapid screening tool, based on Raman and infrared spectroscopy, for determining organic functional group content when complete organic speciation is not required. This capability would allow for a cost-effective means to screen the waste tanks to identify tanks that require more specialized and complete organic speciation to determine tank safety.

Wahl, K.L.; Campbell, J.A.; Clauss, S.A. [and others

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

358

BNL | Center for Functional Nanomaterials (CFN) | Jobs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Current Job Openings at the Center for Functional Nanomaterials The CFN Jobs List is currently unavailable. You may search for CFN positions in the Lab's job list. About CFN The...

359

ARRA Program Summary: Energy Smart Jobs Program  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ARRA Program Summary: Energy Smart Jobs Program Statewide Program (Initially targeting urban Description: The Program focuses on both job creation and energy efficiency. Just over one third, utilities and customers to ensure both job creation and energy efficiency opportunities continue

360

Green Jobs and Energy Economy  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

century, while investments in energy ef ciency measures will redirect money otherwise spent on energy energy sector generates more jobs per unit of energy delivered than the fossil fuel- based sectorGreen Jobs and the Clean Energy Economy THOUGHT LEADERSHIP SERIES Co-authors Ditlev Engel, Chief

Kammen, Daniel M.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "job safety analysis" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Green Jobs and Energy Economy  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

' fossil-fuel economies of the last century, while investments in energy efficiency measures will redirect that the renewable energy sector generates more jobs per unit of energy delivered than the fossil fuel- based sectorGreen Jobs and the Clean Energy Economy ThoughT Leadership series Co-authors Daniel M. Kammen

Kammen, Daniel M.

362

Job Search Strategies for Midlifers  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

biases · Developing a plan · Building an age-proof resume · Interviewing Tips · Resources DePaul Career Resume - 1 Common Resume Principles · Only list the last 10-15 years of job experience · Use up you can do for them · Use no more than 2 pages · Customize your resume for every job · Leave no doubt

Schaefer, Marcus

363

CY 2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan - Chief of Nuclear Safety  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 Reporting Office: Chief of Nuclear Safety . Section One: Current Mission(s) of the Organization and Potential Changes Revision 2 of U.S. Department of Energy Implementation Plan for DNFSB Recommendation 2004-1 established the seven core CTA responsibilities. The Office of the Chief of Nuclear Safety (CNS) performs to following functions in support of the CTA meeting these responsibilities: 1. Nuclear Safety Requirement Concurrence and Exemption * Concur with the determination of the applicability of DOE directives involving nuclear safety included in Energy and Science contracts pursuant to Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR), 48 CFR 970.5204-2, Laws, regulations, and DOE directives, item (b). * Concur with nuclear safety requirements included in Energy and Science contracts pursuant to

364

CY 2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan - Chief of Nuclear Safety  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Reporting Office: Chief of Nuclear Safety . Section One: Current Mission(s) of the Organization and Potential Changes Revision 2 of U.S. Department of Energy Implementation Plan for DNFSB Recommendation 2004-1 established the seven core CTA responsibilities. The Office of the Chief of Nuclear Safety (CNS) performs to following functions in support of the CTA meeting these responsibilities: 1. Nuclear Safety Requirement Concurrence and Exemption * Concur with the determination of the applicability of DOE directives involving nuclear safety included in Energy and Science contracts pursuant to Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR), 48 CFR 970.5204-2, Laws, regulations, and DOE directives, item (b). * Concur with nuclear safety requirements included in Energy and Science contracts pursuant to

365

The safety climate of a Department of Energy nuclear facility: A sociotechnical analysis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Government- and public-sponsored groups are increasingly demanding greater accountability by the Department of Energy`s weapons complex. Many of these demands have focused on the development of a positive safety climate, one that not only protects workers onsite, but also the surrounding populace and environment as well. These demands are, in part, a response to findings which demonstrate a close linkage between actual organizational safety performance and the organization`s safety climate, i.e., the collective attitudes employees hold concerning the level of safety in their organization. This paper describes the approach taken in the systematic assessment of the safety climate at EG&G Rocky Flats Plant (RFP).

Johnson, A.E.; Harbour, J.L.

1993-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

366

Construction Safety Advisory Committee- Membership Roster  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

CSAC members shall consist of DOE and DOE contractor employees whose normal job duties include program management or operational direction of construction safety. Members shall be nominated by their management based on their construction safety expertise and on the needs of the committee.

367

Overview of New Tools to Perform Safety Analysis: BWR Station Black Out Test Case  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment (DPRA) methodologies couple system simulator codes (e.g., RELAP, MELCOR) with simulation controller codes (e.g., RAVEN, ADAPT). While system simulator codes accurately model system dynamics deterministically, simulation controller codes introduce both deterministic (e.g., system control logic, operating procedures) and stochastic (e.g., component failures, parameter uncertainties) elements into the simulation. Typically, a DPRA is performed by: 1) sampling values of a set of parameters from the uncertainty space of interest (using the simulation controller codes), and 2) simulating the system behavior for that specific set of parameter values (using the system simulator codes). For complex systems, one of the major challenges in using DPRA methodologies is to analyze the large amount of information (i.e., large number of scenarios ) generated, where clustering techniques are typically employed to allow users to better organize and interpret the data. In this paper, we focus on the analysis of a nuclear simulation dataset that is part of the Risk Informed Safety Margin Characterization (RISMC) Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) station blackout (SBO) case study. We apply a software tool that provides the domain experts with an interactive analysis and visualization environment for understanding the structures of such high-dimensional nuclear simulation datasets. Our tool encodes traditional and topology-based clustering techniques, where the latter partitions the data points into clusters based on their uniform gradient flow behavior. We demonstrate through our case study that both types of clustering techniques complement each other in bringing enhanced structural understanding of the data.

D. Mandelli; C. Smith; T. Riley; J. Nielsen; J. Schroeder; C. Rabiti; A. Alfonsi; Cogliati; R. Kinoshita; V. Pasucci; B. Wang; D. Maljovec

2014-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

368

Advanced Scientific Computing Research Jobs  

Office of Science (SC) Website

about/jobs/ Below is a list of currently about/jobs/ Below is a list of currently open federal employment opportunities in the Office of Science. Prospective applicants should follow the links to the formal position announcements on USAJOBS.gov for more information. en {D1C7BEC4-D6F9-4FB7-A95E-142A6B699F6B}https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/358465200 Computer Scientist Computer Science Research & Partnerships Division Job Title: Computer Scientist Computer Science Research & Partnerships DivisionOffice: Advanced Scientific Computing ResearchURL: USAjobs listingVacancy Number: 14-DE-SC-HQ-005Location:

369

Running Jobs Overview for Edison  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Overview Overview Overview Overview and Basic Description Jobs on Edison execute on one or more "compute" nodes dedicated to that job. These nodes are distinct from the shared "login" nodes that host interactive sessions and the shared "MOM" nodes that execute commands from a "batch script" that controls how the job runs. Typically, users write the batch script with a text editor and submit it to the system using the "qsub" command. The batch script contains a number of job control directives and also the "aprun" command that actually runs the program in parallel on the compute nodes. It is possible to run small, short parallel jobs interactively as described in the pages in this section. Pages in this section explain the process in more detail.

370

Running Jobs Overview for Edison  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Overview Overview Overview Overview and Basic Description Jobs on Edison execute on one or more "compute" nodes dedicated to that job. These nodes are distinct from the shared "login" nodes that host interactive sessions and the shared "MOM" nodes that execute commands from a "batch script" that controls how the job runs. Typically, users write the batch script with a text editor and submit it to the system using the "qsub" command. The batch script contains a number of job control directives and also the "aprun" command that actually launches the program on to the compute nodes. It is possible to run small, short parallel jobs interactively as described in the pages in this section. Pages in this section explain the process in more detail.

371

Final safety analysis report for the Galileo mission: Volume 3 (Book 2), Nuclear risk analysis document: Appendices: Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

It is the purpose of the NRAD to provide an analysis of the range of potential consequences of accidents which have been identified that are associated with the launching and deployment of the Galileo mission spacecraft. The specific consequences analyzed are those associated with the possible release of radioactive material (fuel) of the Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators (RTGs). They are in terms of radiation doses to people and areas of deposition of radioactive material. These consequence analyses can be used in several ways. One way is to identify the potential range of consequences which might have to be dealt with if there were to be an accident with a release of fuel, so as to assure that, given such an accident, the health and safety of the public will be reasonably protected. Another use of the information, in conjunction with accident and release probabilities, is to estimate the risks associated with the mission. That is, most space launches occur without incident. Given an accident, the most probable result relative to the RTGs is complete containment of the radioactive material. Only a small fraction of accidents might result in a release of fuel and subsequent radiological consequences. The combination of probability with consequence is risk, which can be compared to other human and societal risks to assure that no undue risks are implied by undertaking the mission. Book 2 contains eight appendices.

Not Available

1989-01-25T23:59:59.000Z

372

Jobs and Internships | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Jobs and Internships Jobs and Internships GC Law Library | Credit: DOE Staff Photographer Hantz Legerz GC Law Library | Credit: DOE Staff Photographer Hantz Legerz Opportunities...

373

Transferring Data from Batch Jobs at NERSC  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Transferring Data from Batch Jobs Transferring Data from Batch Jobs Examples Once you are set up for automatic authentication (see HPSS Passwords) you can access HPSS within batch...

374

Bioindustry Creates Green Jobs | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Bioindustry Creates Green Jobs Bioindustry Creates Green Jobs Energy from abundant, renewable, domestic biomass can reduce U.S. dependence on oil, lower impacts on climate, and...

375

Preclosure radiological safety analysis for accident conditions of the potential Yucca Mountain Repository: Underground facilities; Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This preliminary preclosure radiological safety analysis assesses the scenarios, probabilities, and potential radiological consequences associated with postulated accidents in the underground facility of the potential Yucca Mountain repository. The analysis follows a probabilistic-risk-assessment approach. Twenty-one event trees resulting in 129 accident scenarios are developed. Most of the scenarios have estimated annual probabilities ranging from 10{sup {minus}11}/yr to 10{sup {minus}5}/yr. The study identifies 33 scenarios that could result in offsite doses over 50 mrem and that have annual probabilities greater than 10{sup {minus}9}/yr. The largest offsite dose is calculated to be 220 mrem, which is less than the 500 mrem value used to define items important to safety in 10 CFR 60. The study does not address an estimate of uncertainties, therefore conclusions or decisions made as a result of this report should be made with caution.

Ma, C.W.; Sit, R.C.; Zavoshy, S.J.; Jardine, L.J. [Bechtel National, Inc., San Francisco, CA (United States); Laub, T.W. [Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States)

1992-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

376

Safety First Safety Last Safety Always Safety Shoes  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Safety First Safety Last Safety Always Safety Shoes and Boots Safety Tip #21 Don't let your day guards) can be used in conjunction with standard safety shoes. Safety boots Safety boots come in many varieties, and which you will use will depend on the specific hazards you face. Boots offer more protection

Minnesota, University of

377

RESEARCH SAFETY RADIATION SAFETY  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

and Communications Manager (951) 827-6303 janette.ducut@ucr.edu Beiwei Tu, MS, CIH, CSP Safety and Industrial Hygiene, CSP Laboratory Safety Compliance Specialist (951) 827-2528 sarah.meyer@ucr.edu (vacant) Integrated

378

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Technical Training  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Training FAQS Technical Training FAQS August 2010 STEP 1: Job Task Analysis for Tasks Task (and Number) Source Importance Frequency (1) Collaborate with the DOE-wide training community to analyze, design, develop, implement, evaluate, and share required courses and programs that have application beyond the local organization. FAQS Duties and Responsibilities Paragraph 6 3 1 (2) Design and develop training curriculum and/or courses using methods suitable for the target audience, including technology- supported learning when appropriate and cost effective. FAQS Duties and Responsibilities Paragraph 7 4 2 (3) Conduct training sessions and formal presentations. FAQS Duties and Responsibilities Paragraph 8 2 2 Importance Scale Frequency How important is this task to the job? How often is the task performed?

379

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Construction Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

80-2004: Construction Management Functional Area Qualification Standard 80-2004: Construction Management Functional Area Qualification Standard 1 Conducting the Job / Task Analysis DOE-STD-1180-2004: Construction Management Functional Area Qualification Standard Step 1: Identify and evaluate tasks * Develop a comprehensive list of tasks that define the job. o A great starting point is the list of Duties and Responsibilities from the FAQS. o Give careful thought to additional tasks that could be considered. o Don't worry about deleting tasks at this point - that is a part of the process further down. * List the tasks (and their sources, e.g., Duties and Responsibilities #1) in the chart below. * Discuss each task as a group and come to a consensus pertaining to Importance and Frequency of the task (i.e., each team

380

Running Jobs with the UGE Batch System  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Jobs Jobs Running Jobs Submitting Jobs How to submit your job to the UGE. Read More » Running with Java Solutions to some of the common problems users have with running on Genepool when the JVM is part of their workflow. Read More » Batch Script Examples Sample batch scripts for Genepool/Phoebe highlighting queue selection, setting the run time and requesting large amounts of memory. Read More » Interactive Jobs How to run your workflow on the interactive nodes. Read More » Job Arrays Job arrays are a way to efficiently submit large numbers of jobs. Read More » Parallel Batch Scripts This page has examples of how to run parallel jobs on Genepool. Read More » Best Practices - and Practices to Avoid Things users should do to run jobs efficiently using UGE. Read More »

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "job safety analysis" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

A Comparison of Two Approaches to Safety Analysis Based on Use Cases  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Engineering has a long tradition in analyzing the safety of mechanical, electrical and electronic systems. Important methods like HazOp and FMEA have also been adopted by the software ... by the software communit...

Tor Stålhane; Guttorm Sindre

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

382

Job and Economic Development Impact Models (JEDI) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Job and Economic Development Impact Models (JEDI) Job and Economic Development Impact Models (JEDI) Jump to: navigation, search Site head analysis jedi.jpg Overview Originally developed in 2002 for the U.S. Department of Energy's Wind Powering America project, the Job and Economic Development Impact (JEDI) model was designed to be an easy-to-use, excel based calculator which uses IMPLAN's economic multipliers to estimate the economic impacts of constructing and operating power generation and biofuel plants at the local and state levels. It comes as a separate model for wind, PV, natural gas, CSP, coal, and biofuels. Job's, earnings, and impact are outputs. Inputs are construction costs, equipment costs, O&M costs, financing parameters and any other costs associated with the project. With its success in

383

Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Attachment, Integrated Safety...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Energy Institute (NEI) Attachment, Integrated Safety Analysis Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Attachment, Integrated Safety Analysis This paper addresses why the use of an...

384

Review of Documented Safety Analysis Development for the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (LBL Facilities), April 23, 2013 (HSS CRAD 45-58, Rev. 0)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

U.S. Department of U.S. Department of Energy Subject: Review of Documented Safety Analysis Development for the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immob ilization Plant (LBL Facilities) - C riteria and Review Approach D oc um~ HS: HSS CRAD 45-58 Rev: 0 Eff. Date: April 23, 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Acting Di rec or, Office of Safety and Emergency Nltanagement Evaluations Date: Apri l 23 , 20 13 Criteria and Review Approach Document ~~ trd,James Low Date: April 23 , 20 13 1.0 PURPOSE Within the Office of H.ealth, Safety and Security (HSS), the Office of Enforcement and Overs ight, Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (HS-45) miss io n is to assess the effectiveness of the environment, safety, health, and emergency management systems and practices used by line and

385

FAQS Qualification Card - Nuclear Safety Specialist | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Nuclear Safety Specialist Nuclear Safety Specialist FAQS Qualification Card - Nuclear Safety Specialist A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-NuclearSafetySpecialist-2007.docx Description Nuclear Safety Specialist Qualification Card - 2007 FAQC-NuclearSafetySpecialist-2004.docx

386

Nuclear Safety Regulatory Framework  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Department of Energy Department of Energy Nuclear Safety Regulatory Framework DOE's Nuclear Safety Enabling Legislation Regulatory Enforcement & Oversight Regulatory Governance Atomic Energy Act 1946 Atomic Energy Act 1954 Energy Reorganization Act 1974 DOE Act 1977 Authority and responsibility to regulate nuclear safety at DOE facilities 10 CFR 830 10 CFR 835 10 CFR 820 Regulatory Implementation Nuclear Safety Radiological Safety Procedural Rules ISMS-QA; Operating Experience; Metrics and Analysis Cross Cutting DOE Directives & Manuals DOE Standards Central Technical Authorities (CTA) Office of Health, Safety, and Security (HSS) Line Management SSO/ FAC Reps 48 CFR 970 48 CFR 952 Federal Acquisition Regulations External Oversight *Defense Nuclear Facility

387

Subject: Integrated Safety Analysis: Why It Is Appropriate for Fuel Recycling Facilities Project Number: 689Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Letter, 9/10/10  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Enclosed for your review is a Nuclear Energy Institute white paper on the use of Integrated Safety Analysis (ISA) at U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission-licensed recycling facilities. This paper is...

388

A Job Seeker's Guide About this Guide  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

search. Write down all the jobs you applied to: include the title, company name, contact person & phoneA Job Seeker's Guide About this Guide This guide is designed to assist you in your job search. Included in this guide are many helpful tips that you can use throughout your job search process

Butler, Laurie J.

389

FAQS Job Task Analyses- DOE Aviation Manager  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

FAQS Job Task Analyses are performed on the Function Area Qualification Standards. The FAQS Job Task Analyses consists of: Developing a comprehensive list of tasks that define the job such as the duties and responsibilities which include determining their levels of importance and frequency. Identifying and evaluating competencies. Last step is evaluating linkage between job tasks and competencies.

390

Functional Area Qualification Standard Job Task Analyses  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

FAQS Job Task Analyses are performed on the Function Area Qualification Standards. The FAQS Job Task Analyses consists of: Developing a comprehensive list of tasks that define the job such as the duties and responsibilities which include determining their levels of importance and frequency. Identifying and evaluating competencies. Last step is evaluating linkage between job tasks and competencies.

391

FAQS Job Task Analyses- Weapons Quality Assurance  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

FAQS Job Task Analyses are performed on the Function Area Qualification Standards. The FAQS Job Task Analyses consists of: Developing a comprehensive list of tasks that define the job such as the duties and responsibilities which include determining their levels of importance and frequency. Identifying and evaluating competencies. Last step is evaluating linkage between job tasks and competencies.

392

FAQS Job Task Analyses- Radiation Protection  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

FAQS Job Task Analyses are performed on the Function Area Qualification Standards. The FAQS Job Task Analyses consists of: Developing a comprehensive list of tasks that define the job such as the duties and responsibilities which include determining their levels of importance and frequency. Identifying and evaluating competencies. Last step is evaluating linkage between job tasks and competencies.

393

FAQS Job Task Analyses- Deactivation and Decommissioning  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

FAQS Job Task Analyses are performed on the Function Area Qualification Standards. The FAQS Job Task Analyses consists of: Developing a comprehensive list of tasks that define the job such as the duties and responsibilities which include determining their levels of importance and frequency. Identifying and evaluating competencies. Last step is evaluating linkage between job tasks and competencies.

394

MANAGING JOB LOSS and FINANCIAL STRESS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

-hunting strategy. Put time and energy into planning actions that will lead to your next job such as preparingMANAGING JOB LOSS and FINANCIAL STRESS a Personal and Family Guide CENTER ON THE FAMILY #12;2 Managing Job Loss and Financial Stress The issues associated with losing one's job or having hours cut

395

FAQS Job Task Analyses- Quality Assurance  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

FAQS Job Task Analyses are performed on the Function Area Qualification Standards. The FAQS Job Task Analyses consists of: Developing a comprehensive list of tasks that define the job such as the duties and responsibilities which include determining their levels of importance and frequency. Identifying and evaluating competencies. Last step is evaluating linkage between job tasks and competencies.

396

Vermont Sustainable Jobs Fund (Vermont)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Vermont Sustainable Job Fund offers grants, loans, and technical assistance. VSJF's grant-making depends on the funds it raised and its strategic market development focus. Grant proposals are...

397

Safety First Safety Last Safety Always General site safety  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Safety First Safety Last Safety Always General site safety During the course of construction barrier at least 5 feet (1.5m) high having a fire-resistance rating of at least one half hour. Site Safety and Clean-up Safety Tip #20 Safety has no quitting time. All contractors should clean up their debris, trash

Minnesota, University of

398

Safety First Safety Last Safety Always Safety Tip #22  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Safety First Safety Last Safety Always Safety Tip #22 Mowing Operations Mowing unsafely just doesn for out-of-control vehicles. Wear hearing protection and a safety vest. Wear a hard hat and safety goggles of this safety tip sheet. Please refrain from reading the information verbatim--paraphrase it instead

Minnesota, University of

399

An analysis of firefighter personal safety alarm effectiveness on the fire ground  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

For firefighters in the line of duty the last line of defense and chance for rescue oftentimes relies on the effectiveness of their Personal Alert Safety System (PASS) devices. When activated a PASS device emits an alarm signal to notify others that a firefighter is in distress. However there have been notable instances where PASS devices have confused rescue personnel or created a more hazardous situation for instance when noise interference originating from other objects is involved. This research compiles data from various sources for example firefighter near miss reports and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) fatality reports regarding PASS device effectiveness. The research will investigate the causes of confusion and danger as well as take a look at the situations where the device achieved its goal and was able to save a life. The implications of discovering how interfering noises can render PASS devices ineffective could save several lives in the future and ultimately lead to increased firefighter safety.

Kyle Ford; Mudeer Habeeb; Joelle Suits; Mustafa Abbasi; Ofodike Ezekoye

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

400

EXEMPT POSTING JOB TITLE: Research Engineer I/II  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, and work with technicians and senior engineers to ensure the high quality of testing results and analysis analysis of the key test results to ensure quality. Develop independently and/or with senior engineer newEXEMPT POSTING JOB TITLE: Research Engineer I/II DEPARTMENT: NRDC ­ Mechanics Group SUPERVISOR

Demirel, Melik C.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "job safety analysis" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Safety analysis report for packaging (SARP) of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. TRU curium shipping container  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

An analytical evaluation of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Transuranium (TRU) Curium Shipping Container was made to demonstrate its compliance with the regulations governing offsite shipment of packages containing radioactive material. The evaluation encompassed five primary categories: structural integrity, thermal resistance, radiation shielding, nuclear criticality safety, and quality assurance. The results of the evaluation show that the container complies with the applicable regulations.

Box, W.D.; Klima, B.B.; Seagren, R.D.; Shappert, L.B.; Aramayo, G.A.

1980-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

402

Component Failure Behaviour: Patterns and Reuse in Automated System Safety Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

using a pool of shared information and energy resources. In practice, one of the major challenges together a number of currently standalone functions in a common platform where functions are implemented towards implementation of distributed active safety in vehicles is automatic control of the steering

Boyer, Edmond

403

Facility Safety  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

DOE-STD-1104 contains the Department's method and criteria for reviewing and approving nuclear facility's documented safety analysis (DSA). This review and approval formally document the basis for DOE, concluding that a facility can be operated safely in a manner that adequately protects workers, the public, and the environment. Therefore, it is appropriate to formally require implementation of the review methodology and criteria contained in DOE-STD-1104.

2013-06-21T23:59:59.000Z

404

Running Jobs | Argonne Leadership Computing Facility  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Reservations Cobalt Job Control How to Queue a Job Running Jobs FAQs Queuing and Running on BG/Q Systems Data Transfer Debugging & Profiling Performance Tools & APIs Software & Libraries IBM References Intrepid/Challenger/Surveyor Tukey Eureka / Gadzooks Policies Documentation Feedback Please provide feedback to help guide us as we continue to build documentation for our new computing resource. [Feedback Form] Running Jobs Contents Job Submission Submitting a Script Job Sub-block Script Jobs Multiple Consecutive Runs within a Script Job Settings Environment Variables Script Environment Program and Argument Length Limit Job Dependencies Thread Stack Size Verbose Setting for Runjob How do I get each line of the output labeled with the MPI rank that it came from? Mapping of MPI Tasks to Cores

405

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Industrial Hygiene  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Industrial Hygiene FAQS Industrial Hygiene FAQS STEP 1: Job Task Analysis for Tasks Task (and Number) Source Importance Frequency (1) Plan, observe, and evaluate contractor performance involving industrial hygiene activities to ensure the adequacy and effectiveness of contractor programs such as: * Technical performance (e.g., adequacy of technical practices) * Plans, policies, and procedures * Management controls * Worker training and qualification programs * Occurrence reporting and corrective actions * Occupational health programs FAQS Duties and Responsibilities Paragraph C 4 5 (2) Develop, review, and assess industrial hygiene documentation. FAQS Duties and Responsibilities Paragraph D 4 5 (3) Resolve or facilitate the resolution of industrial hygiene issues.

406

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Instrument and Controls  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

or Working Level Competencies or Working Level Competencies DOE-STD-1162, Instrument & Controls Functional Area Qualification Standard (FAQS) September 2010 STEP 1: Job Task Analysis for Tasks associated with Instrument & Controls Task Source Importance Frequency One: Serve as a subject matter expert and technical resource for instrumentation and control systems. Inspect and evaluate instrumentation and control systems for safe and efficient operation, maintenance, and testing. DOE-STD-1162 Duties and Responsibilities Items B and C 3 2 Two: Review and assess authorization basis documentation. Evaluate instrumentation and control system conformity to authorization basis documentation and other design basis documents. Audit facility instrumentation and control

407

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Quality Assurance  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 ~ 1 ~ Job Analysis Worksheet for Quality Assurance Functional Area Qualification Task Source Importance Frequency a. Serve as or support the senior manager responsible for developing the organization's QA Program (QAP) consistent with the DOE QA Order, 414.1A and other customer requirements. Duties and Responsibilities 5 1 b. Review and evaluate the organization's and the contractor's QAP, plans, and processes to verify compliance with applicable regulations, standards, and DOE Orders. Duties and Responsibilities 4 2 c. Monitor and evaluate DOE and contractor implementation of QAPs, plans, and processes to verify adequacy, effectiveness, and compliance with applicable regulations, standards, and DOE Orders, including the evaluation of QA related award fee and

408

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 99-03, Limitation of 10 CFR 830 to Equipment Referenced in the Safety Analysis Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

for Enforcement Department of Energy Washington DC 20585 October 20, 1999 MEMORANDUM FOR: DOE and Contractor PAAA Coordinators FROM: R. Keith Christopher Director Office of Enforcement and Investigation SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 99-03: Limitation of 10 CFR Part 830 to Equipment Referenced in the Safety Analysis Report Recently this Office received a reply to a Preliminary Notice of Violation (PNOV), although not denying any facts or conclusions in the PNOV and agreeing to pay the full imposed Civil Penalty, included arguments that some of the equipment cited in the

409

DOE Updates JOBS and Economic Impacts of Fuel Cells (JOBS FC1.1) Model  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation slides from the Fuel Cell Technologies Program webinar, DOE Updates JOBS and Economic Impacts of Fuel Cells (JOBS FC1.1) Model, held December 11, 2012.

410

Expectations on Documented Safety Analysis for Deactivated Inactive Nuclear Facilities in a State of Long Term Surveillance & Maintenance or Decommissioning  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

DOE promulgated 10 CFR 830 ''Nuclear Safety Management'' on October 10, 2000. Section 204 of the Rule requires that contractors at DOE hazard category 1, 2, and 3 nuclear facilities develop a ''Documented Safety Analysis'' (DSA) that summarizes the work to be performed, the associated hazards, and hazard controls necessary to protect workers, the public, and the environment. Table 2 of Appendix A to the rule has been provided to ensure that DSAs are prepared in accordance with one of the available predetermined ''safe harbor'' approaches. The table presents various acceptable safe harbor DSAs for different nuclear facility operations ranging from nuclear reactors to decommissioning activities. The safe harbor permitted for decommissioning of a nuclear facility encompasses methods described in DOE-STD-1 120-98, ''Integration of Environment, Safety and Health into Facility Disposition Activities,'' and provisions in 29 CFR 1910.120 or 29 CFR 1926.65 (HAZWOPER). Additionally, an evaluation of public safety impacts and development of necessary controls is required when the facility being decommissioned contains radiological inventory or contamination exceeding the Rule's definition for low-level residual fixed radioactivity. This document discusses a cost-effective DSA approach that is based on the concepts of DOE-STD-I 120 and meets the 10 CFR 830 safe harbor requirements for both transition surveillance and maintenance as well as decommissioning. This DSA approach provides continuity for inactive Hanford nuclear facilities that will eventually transition into decommissioning. It also uses a graded approach that meets the expectations of DOE-STD-3011 and addresses HAZWOPER requirements to provide a sound basis for worker protection, particularly where intrusive work is being conducted.

JACKSON, M.W.

2002-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

411

Jobs and Renewable Energy Project  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Early in 2002, REPP developed the Jobs Calculator, a tool that calculates the number of direct jobs resulting from renewable energy development under RPS (Renewable Portfolio Standard) legislation or other programs to accelerate renewable energy development. The calculator is based on a survey of current industry practices to assess the number and type of jobs that will result from the enactment of a RPS. This project built upon and significantly enhanced the initial Jobs Calculator model by (1) expanding the survey to include other renewable technologies (the original model was limited to wind, solar PV and biomass co-firing technologies); (2) more precisely calculating the economic development benefits related to renewable energy development; (3) completing and regularly updating the survey of the commercially active renewable energy firms to determine kinds and number of jobs directly created; and (4) developing and implementing a technology to locate where the economic activity related to each type of renewable technology is likely to occur. REPP worked directly with groups in the State of Nevada to interpret the results and develop policies to capture as much of the economic benefits as possible for the state through technology selection, training program options, and outreach to manufacturing groups.

Sterzinger, George

2006-12-19T23:59:59.000Z

412

Assessing Green Jobs Potential in Developing Countries: A Practitioner's  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Assessing Green Jobs Potential in Developing Countries: A Practitioner's Assessing Green Jobs Potential in Developing Countries: A Practitioner's Guide Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary Name: Assessing Green Jobs Potential in Developing Countries: A Practitioner's Guide Agency/Company /Organization: International Labor Office (ILO) Sector: Energy User Interface: Other Complexity/Ease of Use: Simple Website: www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documen Cost: Free Related Tools Partnership for Economic Policy Modeling and Policy Impact Analysis (MPIA) Applied Dynamic Analysis of the Global Economy (ADAGE) Model Integrated Global System Modeling Framework ... further results Find Another Tool FIND DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS ASSESSMENT TOOLS A guidebook that provides instructions on estimating the actual and

413

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Environmental Restoration Functional Area Qualification  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Restoration Functional Area Qualification Restoration Functional Area Qualification Job Task Analysis CONDUCTING THE JOB / TASK ANALYSIS Identify and evaluate tasks - Develop a comprehensive list of tasks that define the job. o A great starting point is the list of Duties and Responsibilities from the FAQS. o Give careful thought to additional tasks that could be considered. o Don't worry about deleting tasks at this point - that is a part of the process further down. - List the tasks (and their sources, e.g., Duties and Responsibilities #1) in the chart below. - Discuss each task as a group and come to a consensus pertaining to Importance and Frequency of the task (i.e., each team member can consent to the assigned value, even if they don't exactly agree with it). - When all values have been assigned, consider as a group deleting tasks

414

FAQS Job Task Analyses - General Technical Base FAQS  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

GTB JTA: CONDUCTING THE JOB / TASK ANALYSIS GTB JTA: CONDUCTING THE JOB / TASK ANALYSIS (10/26/11) Step 1 Identify and evaluate tasks - Develop a comprehensive list of tasks that define the job. o A great starting point is the list of Duties and Responsibilities from the FAQS. o Give careful thought to additional tasks that could be considered. o Don't worry about deleting tasks at this point - that is a part of the process further down. - List the tasks (and their sources, e.g., Duties and Responsibilities #1) in the chart below. - Discuss each task as a group and come to a consensus pertaining to Importance and Frequency of the task (i.e., each team member can consent to the assigned value, even if they don't exactly agree with it). - When all values have been assigned, consider as a group deleting tasks

415

FAQS Qualification Card - Senior Technical Safety Manager | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Qualification Card - Senior Technical Safety Manager Qualification Card - Senior Technical Safety Manager FAQS Qualification Card - Senior Technical Safety Manager A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-SeniorTechnicalSafetyManager.docx Description Senior Technical Safety Manager Qualification Card

416

FAQS Qualification Card - Occupational Safety | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Qualification Card - Occupational Safety Qualification Card - Occupational Safety FAQS Qualification Card - Occupational Safety A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-OccupationalSafety.docx Description Occupational Safety Qualification Card More Documents & Publications FAQS Qualification Card - Chemical Processing

417

FAQS Qualification Card - Safety Software Quality Assurance | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Safety Software Quality Assurance Safety Software Quality Assurance FAQS Qualification Card - Safety Software Quality Assurance A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-SafetySoftwareQualityAssurance.docx Description Safety Software Quality Assurance Qualification Card More Documents & Publications

418

FAQS Qualification Card - Aviation Safety Officer | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Safety Officer Safety Officer FAQS Qualification Card - Aviation Safety Officer A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-AviationSafetyOfficer.docx Description Aviation Safety Officer Qualification Card More Documents & Publications FAQS Qualification Card - Aviation Manager

419

FAQS Qualification Card - Nuclear Explosive Safety Study | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Nuclear Explosive Safety Study Nuclear Explosive Safety Study FAQS Qualification Card - Nuclear Explosive Safety Study A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-NuclearExplosiveSafetyStudy.docx Description Nuclear Explosive Safety Study Qualification Card More Documents & Publications

420

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Safeguards and Security | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Security FAQS Job Task Analyses - Safeguards and Security FAQS Job Task Analyses are performed on the Function Area Qualification Standards. The FAQS Job Task Analyses consists of:...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "job safety analysis" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Instrument and Controls | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Instrument and Controls FAQS Job Task Analyses - Instrument and Controls FAQS Job Task Analyses are performed on the Function Area Qualification Standards. The FAQS Job Task...

422

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Emergency Management | Department of...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Emergency Management FAQS Job Task Analyses - Emergency Management FAQS Job Task Analyses are performed on the Function Area Qualification Standards. The FAQS Job Task Analyses...

423

Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP) of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU Californium Shipping Container  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

An analytical evaluation of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU Californium Shipping Container was made in order to demonstrate its compliance with the regulations governing off-site shipment of packages that contain radioactive material. The evaluation encompassed five primary categories: structural integrity, thermal resistance, radiation shielding, nuclear criticality safety, and quality assurance. The results of this evaluation demonstrate that the container complies with the applicable regulations.

Box, W.D.; Shappert, L.B.; Seagren, R.D.; Klima, B.B.; Jurgensen, M.C.; Hammond, C.R.; Watson, C.D.

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

424

Packaging review guide for reviewing safety analysis reports for packagings: Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) has established procedures for obtaining certification of packagings used by DOE and its contractors for the transport of radioactive materials. The principal purpose of this document is to assure the quality and uniformity of PCS reviews and to present a well-defined base from which to evaluate proposed changes in the scope and requirements of reviews. The Packaging Review Guide (PRG) also sets forth solutions and approaches determined to be acceptable in the past in dealing with a specific safety issue or safety-related design area. These solutions and approaches are presented in this form so that reviewers can take consistent and well-understood positions as the same safety issues arise in future cases. An applicant submitting a SARP does not have to follow the solutions or approaches presented. It is also a purpose of the PRG to make information about DOE certification policy and procedures widely available to DOE field offices, DOE contractors, federal agencies, and interested members of the public. 77 refs., 16 figs., 15 tabs.

Fisher, L.E.; Chou, C.K.; Lloyd, W.R.; Mount, M.E.; Nelson, T.A.; Schwartz, M.W.; Witte, M.C.

1988-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

425

UNBC SAFETY CHECKLIST SAFETY CHECKLIST  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 UNBC SAFETY CHECKLIST SAFETY CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS PAGE Please use the following table below needs, contact the Risk & Safety Department at 250-960- (5530) for further instructions. This safety. The safety checklist also helps you to establish due diligence under Federal and Provincial safety laws

Northern British Columbia, University of

426

Toolbox Safety Talk Ladder Safety  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Toolbox Safety Talk Ladder Safety Environmental Health & Safety Facilities Safety & Health Section Health & Safety for recordkeeping. Slips, trips, and falls constitute the majority of general industry elevated work tasks. Like any tool, ladders must be used properly to ensure employee safety. GENERAL

Pawlowski, Wojtek

427

Unable to allocate hugepages in running jobs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Unable to allocate hugepages in running jobs Unable to allocate hugepages in running jobs Unable to allocate hugepages in running jobs January 14, 2013 by Helen He (0 Comments) Symptom User job sometimes get an error message similar to the following, usually at the start of a batch job, causing the job to abort: MPICH2 ERROR [Rank 7436] [job id 14638087] [Sat Jan 12 04:56:54 2013] [c11-2c1s3n1] [nid04487] - MPIU_nem_gni_get_hugepages(): Unable to mmap 4194304 bytes for file /var/lib/hugetlbfs/global/pagesize-2097152/hugepagefile.MPICH.0.5841.kvs_14638087, err Cannot allocate memory This is caused by available huge page memory being not sufficient on one or more of the allocated compute nodes. The above error happens more often with jobs using the "-ss" option for the aprun command. It is confirmed

428

Student Jobs | National Nuclear Security Administration  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Jobs | National Nuclear Security Administration Jobs | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Student Jobs Home > Federal Employment > Apply for Our Jobs > How to Apply > Student Jobs Student Jobs Gain valuable work experience while pursuing your academic interests! We are looking for bright, dedicated students interested in making a real

429

Student Jobs | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Jobs | National Nuclear Security Administration Jobs | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Student Jobs Home > Federal Employment > Apply for Our Jobs > How to Apply > Student Jobs Student Jobs Gain valuable work experience while pursuing your academic interests! We are looking for bright, dedicated students interested in making a real

430

Project Manager, TBD Job Description Questionnaire (JDQ)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Project Manager, TBD Job Description Questionnaire (JDQ) Professional Staff Instructions What with a disability in regard to job application procedures, the hiring or discharge of employees, employee Below to Certify Approval or Disapproval: Approval Disapproval ( ) ( ) TBD, Project Manager

Barrash, Warren

431

Geothermal Development Job Types and Impacts  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Development of geothermal power plants and direct-use applications creates a variety of jobs. And the resulting job creation and economic activity within the geothermal industry positively impacts...

432

Going To Work: Finding a Job  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This publication offers basic rules for finding a job, including committing time for the search; contacting friends, relatives and former bosses; checking in more than one place; and keeping records on the job hunt....

Hoffman, Rosemarie

2000-01-07T23:59:59.000Z

433

Rural Job Tax Credit Program (Florida)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Rural Job Tax Credit Program is an incentive for businesses located within one of the 36-designated Qualified Rural Areas to create new jobs. The tax credit ranges from $1000 to $1500 per...

434

Apply for a Job | Argonne National Laboratory  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

You can easily view all current job openings, set up a profile by uploading your resume, and create search agents so that you'll receive automatic notifications when jobs of...

435

Stair Safety  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Stair Safety: Causes and Prevention of Stair Safety: Causes and Prevention of Residential Stair Injuries Cornell Department of Design & Cornell University Cooperative Environmental Analysis Martha Van Rensselaer Hall Extension 607-255-2144 Ithaca, NY 14853 In the United States during 1997 about 27,000 people were killed by unintentional home injuries. 1 Figure 1 illustrates the causes of some of the injuries that resulted in death. As you can see, falls account for the majority of incidents. Also in 1997, 6.8 million people suffered home accidents that resulted in disabling injuries. 1 While data on the number of injuries related to stairs and steps are not available for 1997, data from 1996 show that 984,000 people experienced injuries related to home stairs or steps during

436

Safety and Techno-Economic Analysis of Solvent Selection for Supercritical Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis Reactors  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of the fixed-bed reactor, among other disadvantages, is that the reaction is very exothermic, which is a concern in terms of safety hazards and also in terms of cost of heat removal. With the slurry reactor, a problem is that in the liquid media... at different lengths.4 After the reaction takes place, the amount of carbon monoxide consumed decreases and carbon dioxide is produced as a side product.9 The FTS reaction is an extremely exothermic process, which represents serious challenges...

Hamad, Natalie

2012-02-14T23:59:59.000Z

437

Technical Letter Report: Evaluation and Analysis of a Few International Periodic Safety Review Summary Reports  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

At the request of the United States (U.S.) government, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) assembled a team of 20 senior safety experts to review the regulatory framework for the safety of operating nuclear power plants in the United States. This review focused on the effectiveness of the regulatory functions implemented by the NRC and on its commitment to nuclear safety and continuous improvement. One suggestion resulting from that review was that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) incorporate lessons learned from periodic safety reviews (PSRs) performed in other countries as an input to the NRC’s assessment processes. In the U.S., commercial nuclear power plants (NPPs) are granted an initial 40-year operating license, which may be renewed for additional 20-year periods, subject to complying with regulatory requirements. The NRC has established a framework through its inspection, and operational experience processes to ensure the safe operation of licensed nuclear facilities on an ongoing basis. In contrast, most other countries do not impose a specific time limit on the operating licenses for NPPs, they instead require that the utility operating the plant perform PSRs, typically at approximately 10-year intervals, to assure continued safe operation until the next assessment. The staff contracted with Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne) to perform a pilot review of selected translated PSR assessment reports and related documentation from foreign nuclear regulatory authorities to identify any potential new regulatory insights regarding license renewal-related topics and NPP operating experience (OpE). A total of 14 PSR assessment documents from 9 countries were reviewed. For all of the countries except France, individual reports were provided for each of the plants reviewed. In the case of France, three reports were provided that reviewed the performance assessment of thirty-four 900-MWe reactors of similar design commissioned between 1978 and 1988. All of the reports reviewed were the regulator’s assessment of the PSR findings rather than the original PSR report, and all but one were English translations from the original language. In these reviews, it was found that most of the countries base their regulatory guidance to some extent (and often to a large extent) on U.S. design codes and standards, NRC regulatory guidance, and U.S. industry guidance. In addition, many of the observed operational technical issues and OpE events reported for U.S. reactors are also cited in the PSR reports. The PSR reports also identified a number of potential technical material/component performance issues and OpE events that are not commonly reported for U.S. plants.

Chopra, Omesh K. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States). Environmental Science Division; Diercks, Dwight R. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States). Nuclear Engineering Division; Ma, David Chia-Chiun [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States). Environmental Science Division; Garud, Yogendra S. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States). Environmental Science Division

2013-12-17T23:59:59.000Z

438

Faces of the Recovery Act: Jobs at Savannah River Site | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Jobs at Savannah River Site Jobs at Savannah River Site Faces of the Recovery Act: Jobs at Savannah River Site Addthis Description The Savannah River Site in Aiken, SC has been able to create/save thousands of jobs through the Recovery Act. These are the stories of just a few of the new hires. Speakers Skila Harris, Doug Clark, Bill Picciano, Kelli Culpepper, Nancy Cole, Duration 5:08 Topic Recovery Act Waste Management Nuclear Security & Safety Credit Energy Department Video SKILA HARRIS: We understand the health risks associated with radioactivity much better today than we did 50 years ago. And at the sites where this country was developing its weapons, we were not responsible in how we handled those materials. The recovery act has allowed us to accelerate the clean-up, hire a lot more people so we can

439

Combining Formal Methods and Safety Analysis -The ForMoSA Approach  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

techniques [13, 20] like failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) or fault tree analysis (FTA). The combina in which a component may fail. The leaves of all fault trees are failure modes. The starting column of FMEA

Reif, Wolfgang

440

Formal Support for Quantitative Analysis of Residual Risks in Safety-Critical Systems  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and Fault-Tree Analy- sis (FTA) [16]. However, many of these techniques become

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "job safety analysis" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Puget Sound Career & Job Resources  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Resources - Nonprofit & Government www2.ci.seattle.wa.us/CrisisClinic/ King County Veterans Program (206) 296-7656 www.vetsedge.org/king_county_veterans_program.htm Multi-Service Center, Federal Way (253) 838.lib.washington.edu/research/ click on Jobs and Careers King County Library System (425) 462-9600 www.kcls.org search keywords: Career

Kaminsky, Werner

442

Smart Grid Cybersecurity: Job Performance Model Report and Phase 1 Overview  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Cybersecurity: Job Performance Model Report and Phase 1 Cybersecurity: Job Performance Model Report and Phase 1 Overview (August 2012) Smart Grid Cybersecurity: Job Performance Model Report and Phase 1 Overview (August 2012) In the spring of 2011, the U.S. Department of Energy awarded a project to Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in partnership with the National Board of Information Security Examiners to develop a set of guidelines to enhance development of the smart grid cybersecurity workforce and provide a foundation for future certifications. The project has three phases. The first phase produced an exploratory Job Performance Model based on a factor analysis of responses to a multi-page survey, the Job Analysis Questionnaire (JAQ). The second phase of the project will seek to validate the exploratory model in laboratory simulation studies of a small group of

443

Job Vacancy Notice Job Title Assistant or Associate Professor -Gene Center  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Job Vacancy Notice Job Title Assistant or Associate Professor - Gene Center Job ID 6340 Location: Hunter College Full/Part Time Full-Time Regular/Temporary Regular FACULTY VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT The City on our web site and search for this vacancy using the Job ID or Title. Candidates should provide a CV

Chase, Sheila

444

Preliminary safety analysis report for the Auxiliary Hot Cell Facility, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Auxiliary Hot Cell Facility (AHCF) at Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico (SNL/NM) will be a Hazard Category 3 nuclear facility used to characterize, treat, and repackage radioactive and mixed material and waste for reuse, recycling, or ultimate disposal. A significant upgrade to a previous facility, the Temporary Hot Cell, will be implemented to perform this mission. The following major features will be added: a permanent shield wall; eight floor silos; new roof portals in the hot-cell roof; an upgraded ventilation system; and upgraded hot-cell jib crane; and video cameras to record operations and facilitate remote-handled operations. No safety-class systems, structures, and components will be present in the AHCF. There will be five safety-significant SSCs: hot cell structure, permanent shield wall, shield plugs, ventilation system, and HEPA filters. The type and quantity of radionuclides that could be located in the AHCF are defined primarily by SNL/NM's legacy materials, which include radioactive, transuranic, and mixed waste. The risk to the public or the environment presented by the AHCF is minor due to the inventory limitations of the Hazard Category 3 classification. Potential doses at the exclusion boundary are well below the evaluation guidelines of 25 rem. Potential for worker exposure is limited by the passive design features incorporated in the AHCF and by SNL's radiation protection program. There is no potential for exposure of the public to chemical hazards above the Emergency Response Protection Guidelines Level 2.

OSCAR,DEBBY S.; WALKER,SHARON ANN; HUNTER,REGINA LEE; WALKER,CHERYL A.

1999-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

445

Safety First Safety Last Safety Always Requirements for employers  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Safety First Safety Last Safety Always Requirements for employers · Fallprotectionsandproperuseofrelated-safety equipmentsuchaslifelines,harness · Properuseofdangeroustools,thenecessaryprecautionstotake,andtheuseof theprotectiveandemergencyequipmentrequired. Safety Training and Education Safety Tip #18 Get smart. Use safety from the start. All

Minnesota, University of

446

Search the Site Post Job | Search Resumes  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Search the Site News Employers Post Job | Search Resumes HOME CAREER NETWORK NEWS HOTBEDS EVENT CENTER CAREER FAIRS COMPANY PROFILES BIOPHARM INSIGHT ABOUT US NEWSLETTERS FREE Newsletters NEWS News by Subject News by Disease News by Date PLoS Search News CAREER NETWORK Most Recent Jobs Search Jobs Post

Chiao, Jung-Chih

447

Company Name: JobsInNH.com  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Company Name: JobsInNH.com Web Site: www.jobsinnh.com Industry: Advertising & Marketing Brief Company Overview: "Since 2002, JobsInNH.com has been New Hampshire?s #1 employment resource. As recruiting and accelerate your job search. Connect with the best employers in the state who are hiring now" Majors

New Hampshire, University of

448

Chemical Safety Program  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Program Program Home Chemical Safety Topical Committee Library Program Contacts Related Links Site Map Tools 2013 Chemical Safety Workshop Archived Workshops Contact Us Health and Safety HSS Logo Chemical Safety Program logo The Department of Energy's (DOE's) Chemical Safety web pages provide a forum for the exchange of best practices, lessons learned, and guidance in the area of chemical management. This page is supported by the Chemical Safety Topical Committee which was formed to identify chemical safety-related issues of concern to the DOE and pursue solutions to issues identified. Noteworthy products are the Chemical Management Handbooks and the Chemical Lifecycle Cost Analysis Tool, found under the TOOLS menu. Chemical Management Handbook Vol (1) Chemical Management Handbook Vol (2)

449

Safety and Technical Services  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Safety and Technical Services Safety and Technical Services Minimize The Safety and Technical Services (STS) organization is a component of the Office of Science's (SC's) Oak Ridge Integrated Support Center. The mission of STS is to provide excellent environmental, safety, health, quality, and engineering support to SC laboratories and other U.S. Department of Energy program offices. STS maintains a full range of technically qualified Subject Matter Experts, all of whom are associated with the Technical Qualifications Program. Examples of the services that we provide include: Integrated Safety Management Quality Assurance Planning and Metrics Document Review Tracking and trending analysis and reporting Assessments, Reviews, Surveillances and Inspections Safety Basis Support SharePoint/Dashboard Development for Safety Programs

450

Safety System Oversight  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Safety System Oversight Safety System Oversight Office of Nuclear Safety Home Safety System Oversight Home Annual SSO/FR Workshop DOE Safety Links › ORPS Info › Operating Experience Summary › DOE Lessons Learned › Accident Investigation Program Assessment Tools › SSO CRADS Subject Matter Links General Program Information › Program Mission Statement › SSO Program Description › SSO Annual Award Program › SSO Annual Award › SSO Steering Committee › SSO Program Assessment CRAD SSO Logo Items Site Leads and Steering Committee Archive Facility Representative Contact Us HSS Logo SSO SSO Program News Congratulations to Ronnie L. Alderson of Nevada Field Office, the Winner of the 2012 Safety System Oversight Annual Award! 2012 Safety System Oversight Annual Award Nominees SSO Staffing Analysis

451

Environment/Health/Safety/Security (EHSS): Tool Box Safety Topics  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Tool Box Safety Topics Tool Box Safety Topics A Review of Haz com standards A Single Second Accident Prevention Acetone Use and Care Aerial Work Platforms Afterthoughts and Regrets Alcohol & the Job Allergies, Antihistamines Appreciating the Hazards, Oxyacetylene Attitude and Behavior Avoid Common Office Injuries Avoiding Electrical Shocks Back Care Back Injury Prevention Backing into Trouble Basic Machine Safety Battery Charging Hazards Be Cautious with Sulfuric Acid Be Prepared for Emergencies Bench & Pedestal Grinders Blood Borne Pathogens Carbon Monoxide Care for Half-Mask Respirators Carelessness Cargo Dock Safety CDT's-How you prevent them Chocking and Blocking Cold Medication.Drowsiness Cold Weather Hazards for Propane Powered Vehicles Come-a-Longs, Hoists & Chains Common Sense & Accidents

452

Proceedings of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission fifteenth water reactor safety information meeting: Volume 1, Plenary sessions, reactor licensing topics, NUREG-1150, risk analysis/PRA applications, innovative concepts for increased safety of advanced power reactors, severe accident modeling and analysis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This six-volume report contains 140 papers out of the 164 that were presented at the Fifteenth Water Reactor Safety Information Meeting held at the National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, Maryland, during the week of October 26-29, 1987. The papers are printed in the order of their presentation in each session and describe progress and results of programs in nuclear safety research conducted in this country and abroad. This report, Volume 1, discusses the following: plenary sessions; reactor licensing; NUREG-1150; risk analysis; innovative concepts for increased safety of advanced power reactors; and severe accident modeling and analysis. Thirty-two reports have been cataloged separately.

Weiss, A.J. (comp.)

1988-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

453

Indeed is the #1 job search engine worldwide. Since 2004, Indeed has given job seekers free access to millions of jobs from thousands of company websites and job boards. Our core mis-  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Indeed is the #1 job search engine worldwide. Since 2004, Indeed has given job seekers free access to millions of jobs from thousands of company websites and job boards. Our core mis- sion is to help people get jobs. To make this possible, we built an amazing platform that han- dles 5 billion job search

Ghosh, Joydeep

454

From The Washington Post 11/26/07From The Washington Post 11/26/07 Job 38: God speaks to JobJob 38: God speaks to Job  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

From The Washington Post 11/26/07From The Washington Post 11/26/07 #12;Job 38: God speaks to JobJob 38: God speaks to Job Then the LORD answered Job out of the storm. HeThen the LORD answered Job out Thermal energy lost to space; must balance absorbed solar energy Solar energy in Greenhouse effect #12

Rigor, Ignatius G.

455

Safety Analysis Report for the use of hazardous production materials in photovoltaic applications at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

To ensure the continued safety of SERI's employees, the community, and the environment, NREL commissioned an internal audit of its photovoltaic operations that used hazardous production materials (HPMs). As a result of this audit, NREL management voluntarily suspended all operations using toxic and/or pyrophoric gases. This suspension affected seven laboratories and ten individual deposition systems. These activities are located in Building 16, which has a permitted occupancy of Group B, Division 2 (B-2). NREL management decided to do the following. (1) Exclude from this SAR all operations which conformed, or could easily be made to conform, to B-2 Occupancy requirements. (2) Include in this SAR all operations that could be made to conform to B-2 Occupancy requirements with special administrative and engineering controls. (3) Move all operations that could not practically be made to conform to B-2 Occupancy requirements to alternate locations. In addition to the layered set of administrative and engineering controls set forth in this SAR, a semiquantitative risk analysis was performed on 30 various accident scenarios. Twelve presented only routine risks, while 18 presented low risks. Considering the demonstrated safe operating history of NREL in general and these systems specifically, the nature of the risks identified, and the layered set of administrative and engineering controls, it is clear that this facility falls within the DOE Low Hazard Class. Each operation can restart only after it has passed an Operational Readiness Review, comparing it to the requirements of this SAR, while subsequent safety inspections will ensure future compliance.

Crandall, R.S.; Nelson, B.P. (National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO (United States)); Moskowitz, P.D.; Fthenakis, V.M. (Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States))

1992-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

456

Preparation Guide for U. S. Department of Energy Nonreactor Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analysis  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-3009-94 July 1994 CHANGE NOTICE NO. 12 January 2000 5 December 24 April 20021 DOE STANDARD PREPARATION GUIDE FOR U.S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NONREACTOR NUCLEAR FACILITY DOCUMENTED SAFETY ANALYSISANALYSES REPORTS U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, DC 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. TS This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161;

457

Preparation Guide for U. S. Department of Energy Nonreator Nuclear Facility Document Safety Analysis  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SENSITIVE DOE-STD-3009-94 July 1994 CHANGE NOTICE NO. 1 January 2000 CHANGE NOTICE NO. 2 April 2002 DOE STANDARD PREPARATION GUIDE FOR U.S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NONREACTOR NUCLEAR FACILITY DOCUMENTED SAFETY ANALYSES U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, DC 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. TS TS This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161;

458

Flammable gas tank safety program: Technical basis for gas analysis and monitoring  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Several Hanford waste tanks have been observed to exhibit periodic releases of significant quantities of flammable gases. Because potential safety issues have been identified with this type of waste behavior, applicable tanks were equipped with instrumentation offering the capability to continuously monitor gases released from them. This document was written to cover three primary areas: (1) describe the current technical basis for requiring flammable gas monitoring, (2) update the technical basis to include knowledge gained from monitoring the tanks over the last three years, (3) provide the criteria for removal of Standard Hydrogen Monitoring System(s) (SHMS) from a waste tank or termination of other flammable gas monitoring activities in the Hanford Tank farms.

Estey, S.D.

1998-04-22T23:59:59.000Z

459

UNBC SAFETY CHECKLIST SAFETY CHECKLIST  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 UNBC SAFETY CHECKLIST SAFETY CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS PAGE Please use the following table below needs, contact the Risk & Safety Department at 250-960- (5530) for further instructions. This safety to remain safe here at UNBC. The safety checklist also helps you to establish due diligence under Federal

Northern British Columbia, University of

460

Occupational Health and Safety Animal Job Exposure Form  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

symptoms within the past year? Chronic Cough Asthma Hay Fever Skin Rash Eczema Chronic Allergies (food

California at Santa Barbara, University of

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "job safety analysis" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Advanced Manufacturing Jobs and Innovation Accelerator Challenge |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Assistance » Advanced Manufacturing Jobs and Innovation Technical Assistance » Advanced Manufacturing Jobs and Innovation Accelerator Challenge Advanced Manufacturing Jobs and Innovation Accelerator Challenge October 10, 2013 - 12:01pm Addthis The Advanced Manufacturing Jobs and Innovation Accelerator Challenge (Accelerator) is a multi-agency sponsored competition established to enhance existing regional networks of firms and institutions that accelerate technology-related innovation, business formation, and job creation. Funding provided to these regional networks (also called clusters) help academia, utilities, local governments, and private industry and investors expand partnerships, share strategic information more efficiently, and reduce costs by leveraging existing assets and resources (like physical facilities and equipment).

462

Integrated Safety Management Safety Culture Resources | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Safety Culture Resources Integrated Safety Management Safety Culture Resources A collection of resources available in implementing ISM safety culture activities Safety from the...

463

POST-DOCTORAL FELLOWSHIP IN HIGH ENERGY THEORY GROUP The BNL job link for BNL JOB ID#15942 is  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

POST-DOCTORAL FELLOWSHIP IN HIGH ENERGY THEORY GROUP The BNL job link for BNL JOB ID#15942 is" within the dropdown box -Click on Job ID #15942, "Research Associate, High Energy Theory (6482)" After: https://jobs.bnl.gov/psc/Jobs/EMPLOYEE/HRMS/c/HRS_HRAM.HRS_CE.GBL The description of BNL Job ID #15942

Johnson, Peter D.

464

Formal Safety analysis of a radio-based railroad crossing using Deductive Cause-Consequence  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

and effects analysis (FMEA) and fault tree analysis (FTA). We apply the method to a real world case study like FMEA [10], FMECA [4] and FTA [3]. The logical framework of DCCA may be used to rigorously verify of what can by analyzed) than traditional FMEA. We show, that the results of DCCA have the same semantics

Reif, Wolfgang

465

Safety Analysis of an Airbag System Using Probabilistic FMEA and Probabilistic Counterexamples  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) isa technique to reason about possible system hazards thatresult from system or system component failures. Traditionally, FMEA does not take the probabilities with which these failures may occur into account. ... Keywords: Probabilistic FMEA, Stochastic Modelling, Stochastic Model Checking, Counter Examples in Stochastic Model Checking, Dependability Analysis

Husain Aljazzar; Manuel Fischer; Lars Grunske; Matthias Kuntz; Florian Leitner-Fischer; Stefan Leue

2009-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

466

Reliability analysis of safety-related digital instrumentation and control in a nuclear power plant.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

?? There is so far no consensus on how to develop a reliability model of safety-related digitalinstrumentation and control (I&C) in a probabilistic safety assessment… (more)

Gustafsson, Johan

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

467

Implementation of Revision 19 of the TRUPACT-II Safety Analysis Report at Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission on July 27, 2001 approved Revision 19 of the TRUPACT-II Safety Analysis Report (SAR) and the associated TRUPACT-II Authorized Methods for Payload Control (TRAMPAC). Key initiatives in Revision 19 included matrix depletion, unlimited mixing of shipping categories, a flammability assessment methodology, and an alternative methodology for the determination of flammable gas generation rates. All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) sites shipping transuranic (TRU) waste to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) were required to implement Revision 19 methodology into their characterization and waste transportation programs by May 20, 2002. An implementation process was demonstrated by the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS) in Golden, Colorado. The three-part process used by RFETS included revision of the site-specific TRAMPAC, an evaluation of the contact-handled TRU waste inventory against the regulations in Revision 19, and design and development of software to facilitate future inventory analyses.

D'Amico, E.; O'Leary, J.; Bell, S.; Djordjevic, S.; Givens, C,; Shokes, T.; Thompson, S.; Stahl, S.

2003-02-25T23:59:59.000Z

468

Green Jobs Tax Credit | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Green Jobs Tax Credit Green Jobs Tax Credit Green Jobs Tax Credit < Back Eligibility Commercial Industrial Savings Category Bioenergy Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Heating & Cooling Solar Swimming Pool Heaters Water Heating Commercial Heating & Cooling Heating Wind Buying & Making Electricity Maximum Rebate $175,000 Program Info Start Date 07/01/2010 State Virginia Program Type Industry Recruitment/Support Rebate Amount $500 per each job created Provider Office of the Secretary of Commerce and Trade In April 2010, Virginia enacted the green jobs tax credit. For every green job created with a yearly salary of $50,000 or more, the company will earn a $500 income tax credit for five years. The Office of Commerce and Trade will develop a full list of jobs eligible to qualify for the tax credit.

469

DOE-STD-1027-92; Hazard Categorization and Accident Analysis Techniques For Compliance With DOE Order 5480.23, Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7-92 7-92 December 1992 CHANGE NOTICE NO.1 September 1997 DOE STANDARD HAZARD CATEGORIZATION AND ACCIDENT ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLIANCE WITH DOE ORDER 5480.23, NUCLEAR SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTS U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE98001283 Change Notice No. 1 DOE-STD-1027-92

470

Toolbox Safety Talk Safety Data Sheets (SDS)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Toolbox Safety Talk Safety Data Sheets (SDS) Environmental Health & Safety Facilities Safety-in sheet to Environmental Health & Safety for recordkeeping. Chemical manufacturers are required to produce Safety Data Sheets (SDS) for all chemicals produced. "Safety Data Sheets", previously referred

Pawlowski, Wojtek

471

Public Safety Public Safety Center  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

and bring someone with you or visit a grocery store or gas station. Personal Safety Precautions Safety the police, or go di- rectly to the police station or Public Safety. Do not label keys with your name or any

472

Results from One- and Two- Phase Fluid Flow Calculations within the Preliminary Safety Analysis of the Gorleben Site - 13310  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Rock salt is one of the possible host rock formations for the disposal of high-level radioactive wastes in Germany. The Preliminary Safety Analysis of the Gorleben Site (Vorlaeufige Sicherheitsanalyse Gorleben, VSG) evaluates the long-term safety of a hypothetical repository in the salt dome of Gorleben, Germany. A mature repository concept and detailed knowledge of the site allowed a detailed process analysis within the project by numerical modeling of single-phase and two-phase flow. The possibility of liquid transport from the shafts to the emplacement drifts is one objective of the present study. Also, the implications of brine inflow on radionuclide transport and gas generation are investigated. Pressure build-up due to rock convergence and gas generation, release of volatile radionuclides from the waste and pressure-driven contaminant transport were considered, too. The study confirms that the compaction behavior of salt grit backfill is one of the most relevant factors for the hydrodynamic evolution of the repository and the transport of contaminants. Due to the interaction between compaction, saturation and pore pressure, complex flow patterns evolve. Emplacement drifts serve as gas sinks or sources at different times. In most calculation cases, the backfill reaches its final porosity after a few hundred years. The repository is then sealed and radionuclides can only be transported by diffusion in the liquid phase. Estimates for the final porosity of compacted backfill range between 0 % and 2 %. The exact properties of the backfill regarding single- and two-phase flow are not well known for this porosity range. The study highlights that this uncertainty has a profound impact on flow and transport processes over long time-scales. Therefore, more research is needed to characterize the properties of crushed salt grit at low porosities or to reduce the adverse effects of possible higher porosities by repository optimization. (authors)

Kock, Ingo; Larue, Juergen; Fischer, Heidi; Frieling, Gerd; Navarro, Martin; Seher, Holger [Department of Final Disposal, GRS mbH, Schwertnergasse 1, 50667 Cologne (Germany)] [Department of Final Disposal, GRS mbH, Schwertnergasse 1, 50667 Cologne (Germany)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

473

INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN JOB AID  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN JOB AID INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN JOB AID Log into to ESS>Click the IDP drop down menu>Click Start Page Click on "Create a new IDP" NOTE: This screen also gives you the option to change supervisors, view, update and rollover your IDP. Your initial IDP will be (blank) in the goal column for your 3 Short Range and Long Range goals, so click on the word/link (Modify) to enter goals. Enter your Goal in the box below>Click Save This window will appear>Click on one of the Activity boxes below to enter an activity. You can add more than one activity per goal. This window will appear so you can enter the detailed information for your activities. You can select one of the 3 save options on the bottom. To View your IDP>Click on View current IDP (example is below this screen

474

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Office of Health, Safety and Security  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

475

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Office of Health, Safety and Security  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

476

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Chief of Nuclear Safety  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

477

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Office of Health, Safety and Security  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

478

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Chief of Nuclear Safety  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

479

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Chief of Nuclear Safety  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

480

Preliminary Study on Reliability Analysis of Safety I&C System in NPP  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Digital instrumentation and control (I&C) systems, such as digital Reactor Protection System (RPS), are being employed ... upgraded Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs). The reliability analysis of digital I&C system turn...

Chao Guo; Duo Li; Huasheng Xiong

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "job safety analysis" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

2014 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

482

2014 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Chief of Nuclear Safety  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

483

Cryogenic safety  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Cryogenic safety ... Examines the properties of cryogenic fluids and hazards associated with their use and storage. ...

Eric W. Spencer

1964-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

484

ANALYSIS OF SAFETY RELIEF VALVE PROOF TEST DATA TO OPTIMIZE LIFECYCLE MAINTENANCE COSTS  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Proof test results were analyzed and compared with a proposed life cycle curve or hazard function and the limit of useful life. Relief valve proof testing procedures, statistical modeling, data collection processes, and time-in-service trends are presented. The resulting analysis of test data allows for the estimation of the PFD. Extended maintenance intervals to the limit of useful life as well as methodologies and practices for improving relief valve performance and reliability are discussed. A generic cost-benefit analysis and an expected life cycle cost reduction concludes that $90 million maintenance dollars might be avoided for a population of 3000 valves over 20 years.

Gross, Robert; Harris, Stephen

2007-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

485

Facility Safety  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The objective of this Order is to establish facility safety requirements related to: nuclear safety design, criticality safety, fire protection and natural phenomena hazards mitigation. The Order has Change 1 dated 11-16-95, Change 2 dated 10-24-96, and the latest Change 3 dated 11-22-00 incorporated. The latest change satisfies a commitment made to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) in response to DNFSB recommendation 97-2, Criticality Safety.

2000-11-20T23:59:59.000Z

486

Technical Review Report for the Safety Analysis Report for Packaging Model 9977 S-SARP-G-00001 Revision 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Technical Review Report (TRR) summarizes the review findings for the Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP) for the Model 9977 B(M)F-96 shipping container. The content analyzed for this submittal is Content Envelope C.1, Heat Sources, in assemblies of Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators or food-pack cans. The SARP under review, i.e., S-SARP-G-00001, Revision 2 (August 2007), was originally referred to as the General Purpose Fissile Material Package. The review presented in this TRR was performed using the methods outlined in Revision 3 of the Department of Energy's (DOE's) Packaging Review Guide (PRG) for Reviewing Safety Analysis Reports for Packages. The format of the SARP follows that specified in Revision 2 of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's, Regulatory Guide 7.9, i.e., Standard Format and Content of Part 71 Applications for Approval of Packages for Radioactive Material. Although the two documents are similar in their content, they are not identical. Formatting differences have been noted in this TRR, where appropriate. The Model 9977 Package is a 35-gallon drum package design that has evolved from a family of packages designed by DOE contractors at the Savannah River Site. The Model 9977 Package design includes a single, 6-inch diameter, stainless steel pressure vessel containment system (i.e., the 6CV) that was designed and fabricated in accordance with Section III, Subsection NB, of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code. The earlier package designs, i.e., the Model 9965, 9966, 9967 and 9968 Packages, were originally designed and certified in the 1980s. In the 1990s, updated package designs that incorporated design features consistent with new safety requirements, based on International Atomic Energy Agency guidelines, were proposed. The updated package designs were the Model 9972, 9973, 9974 and 9975 Packages, respectively. The Model 9975 Package was certified by the Packaging Certification Program, under the Office of Safety Management and Operations. Differences between the Model 9975 Package and the Model 9977 Package include: (1) The lead shield present in the Model 9975 Package is absent in the Model 9977 Package; (2) The Model 9975 Package has eight allowable contents, while the Model 9977 Package has a single allowable content. (3) The 6CV of the Model 9977 Package is similar in design to the outer Containment Vessel of the Model 9975 Package that also incorporates a 5-inch Containment Vessel as the inner Containment Vessel. (4) The Model 9975 Package uses a Celotex{reg_sign}-based impact limiter while the Model 9977 Package uses Last-A-Foam{reg_sign}, a polyurethane foam, for the impact limiter. (5) The Model 9975 Package has two Containment Vessels, while the Model 9977 Package has a single Containment Vessel.

DiSabatino, A; Hafner, R; West, M

2007-10-04T23:59:59.000Z

487

On the Safety of Nocker's Strictness Analysis Manfred Schmidt-Schau1  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Frankfurt, Germany, schauss@ki.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de 2 Dept. of Mathematics and Computing Science Intelligence and Software Technology, Institut f¨ur Informatik, J.W.Goethe-Universit¨at Frankfurt, 30.10.2004 Abstract. This paper proves correctness of N¨ocker's method of strict- ness analysis, implemented for Clean

Schmidt-Schauss, Manfred

488

Advances in thermal hydraulic and neutronic simulation for reactor analysis and safety  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper describes several large-scale computational models developed at Argonne National Laboratory for the simulation and analysis of thermal-hydraulic and neutronic events in nuclear reactors and nuclear power plants. The impact of advanced parallel computing technologies on these computational models is emphasized.

Tentner, A.M.; Blomquist, R.N.; Canfield, T.R.; Ewing, T.F.; Garner, P.L.; Gelbard, E.M.; Gross, K.C.; Minkoff, M.; Valentin, R.A.

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

489

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Emergency Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Emergency Management FAQS Emergency Management FAQS August 2010 STEP 1: Job Task Analysis for Tasks Task (and Number) Source Importance Frequency Plan, observe and evaluate emergency management activities and Federal and contractor technical performance to ensure the adequacy, effectiveness, and compliance with Department of Energy (DOE) Order 151.1B and other DOE Orders and Federal regulations. FAQS Duties and Responsibilities #3 5 3 Review, and/or approve emergency management documentation. FAQS Duties and Responsibilities #4 3 2 Facilitate the notification and reporting of emergencies under Department of Energy (DOE) Order 151.1B Comprehensive Emergency Management System. FAQS Duties and Responsibilities #6 4 1 Resolve, or facilitate the resolution of, emergency management issues.

490

Safety Analysis Report for the use of hazardous production materials in photovoltaic applications at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

To ensure the continued safety of SERI`s employees, the community, and the environment, NREL commissioned an internal audit of its photovoltaic operations that used hazardous production materials (HPMs). As a result of this audit, NREL management voluntarily suspended all operations using toxic and/or pyrophoric gases. This suspension affected seven laboratories and ten individual deposition systems. These activities are located in Building 16, which has a permitted occupancy of Group B, Division 2 (B-2). NREL management decided to do the following. (1) Exclude from this SAR all operations which conformed, or could easily be made to conform, to B-2 Occupancy requirements. (2) Include in this SAR all operations that could be made to conform to B-2 Occupancy requirements with special administrative and engineering controls. (3) Move all operations that could not practically be made to conform to B-2 Occupancy requirements to alternate locations. In addition to the layered set of administrative and engineering controls set forth in this SAR, a semiquantitative risk analysis was performed on 30 various accident scenarios. Twelve presented only routine risks, while 18 presented low risks. Considering the demonstrated safe operating history of NREL in general and these systems specifically, the nature of the risks identified, and the layered set of administrative and engineering controls, it is clear that this facility falls within the DOE Low Hazard Class. Each operation can restart only after it has passed an Operational Readiness Review, comparing it to the requirements of this SAR, while subsequent safety inspections will ensure future compliance.

Crandall, R.S.; Nelson, B.P. [National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO (United States); Moskowitz, P.D.; Fthenakis, V.M. [Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States)

1992-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

491

Accrediting industrial safety training programs  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

There are job-specific training requirements established by regulations that Impose stringent training requirements on a contractor, for example, the Occupational Safety & Health Act (OSHA). Failure to comply with OSHA training requirements can result in severe penalties being levied against a company. Although an accredited training program is expensive, it is a possible solution for minimizing risks associated with job-specific training requirements for employees. Operating DOE contractors direct approximately 10 percent of the operating funds toward training activities. Training needs for contractors span a broad range, from requirements awareness training for managers, to general training required on a one-time basis for all employees, to highly specialized training programs for employees involved In clean-up operations at hazardous waste sites. With this kind of an investment in training, it is logical to maximize the most return on an investment of training funds and to limit exposure to liability suits whenever possible. This presentation will provide an overview of accredited industrial safety programs. The criteria for accredited industrial safety programs will be defined. The question of whether accredited training programs are necessary will be examined. Finally, advantages and disadvantages will be identified for accrediting industrial safety training programs.

Beitel, L.

1992-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

492

Accrediting industrial safety training programs  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

There are job-specific training requirements established by regulations that Impose stringent training requirements on a contractor, for example, the Occupational Safety Health Act (OSHA). Failure to comply with OSHA training requirements can result in severe penalties being levied against a company. Although an accredited training program is expensive, it is a possible solution for minimizing risks associated with job-specific training requirements for employees. Operating DOE contractors direct approximately 10 percent of the operating funds toward training activities. Training needs for contractors span a broad range, from requirements awareness training for managers, to general training required on a one-time basis for all employees, to highly specialized training programs for employees involved In clean-up operations at hazardous waste sites. With this kind of an investment in training, it is logical to maximize the most return on an investment of training funds and to limit exposure to liability suits whenever possible. This presentation will provide an overview of accredited industrial safety programs. The criteria for accredited industrial safety programs will be defined. The question of whether accredited training programs are necessary will be examined. Finally, advantages and disadvantages will be identified for accrediting industrial safety training programs.

Beitel, L.

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

493

Structure-Soil-Structure Interaction Effects: Seismic Analysis of Safety-Related Collocated Structures  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

STRUCTURE-SOIL- STRUCTURE-SOIL- STRUCTURE INTERACTION AT SRS Structural Mechanics - SRS October 25, 2011 1 Objective Determination of Structure Soil Structure Interaction (SSSI) effects, if any between large and more massive Process Building (PB) and Exhaust Fan Building (EFB). Results of the SSSI analysis were compared with those from Soil Structure Interaction (SSI) analysis of the individual buildings, for the following parameters: * In-structure floor response spectra (ISRS) * Transfer functions * Relative displacements for EFB and PB * In-plane- shear from SASSI at EFB wall 2 Building Description 3 The Process Building is a massive reinforced concrete structure supported approximately 40 feet below the finished grade. The PB approximate foundation dimensions are approximately

494

Full-length high-temperature severe fuel damage test No. 2. Final safety analysis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Hazardous conditions associated with performing the Full-Length High- Temperature (FLHT). Severe Fuel Damage Test No. 2 experiment have been analyzed. Major hazards that could cause harm or damage are (1) radioactive fission products, (2) radiation fields, (3) reactivity changes, (4) hydrogen generation, (5) materials at high temperature, (6) steam explosion, and (7) steam pressure pulse. As a result of this analysis, it is concluded that with proper precautions the FLHT- 2 test can be safely conducted.

Hesson, G.M.; Lombardo, N.J.; Pilger, J.P.; Rausch, W.N.; King, L.L.; Hurley, D.E.; Parchen, L.J.; Panisko, F.E.

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

495

Job Types | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Types | National Nuclear Security Administration Types | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Job Types Home > Federal Employment > Our Jobs > Job Types Job Types NNSA's workforce is comprised of a diverse and dynamic blend of individuals. We are a staff of top-performing program and technical experts with unbounded potential, a dedication to public service and a commitment

496

Pine Ridge Job Corp | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Job Corp Job Corp Jump to: navigation, search Name Pine Ridge Job Corp Facility Pine Ridge Job Corp Sector Wind energy Facility Type Small Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner Pine Ridge Job Corp Energy Purchaser Omaha Public Power District Location Pine Ridge Job Corp Coordinates 42.68121684°, -102.9838818° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":42.68121684,"lon":-102.9838818,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

497

Job Counting Guidelines | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Mission » Recovery Act » Job Counting Guidelines Mission » Recovery Act » Job Counting Guidelines Job Counting Guidelines The following updated definitions and guidelines are intended to provide EM Recovery Act sites with information to collect and report timely and accurate full-time equivalent and cumulative head-count data for both monthly and quarterly jobs data calls. These revised guidelines supersede the previous monthly jobs data reporting definitions and guidelines dated February 9, 2010. These revised guidelines remain consistent with OMB guidance issued December 18, 2009 and cover subcontractors and vendors as well as prime contractors. Job Counting Guidelines More Documents & Publications EA-1548: Finding of No Significant Impact Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx Proceedings of the Computational Needs for the Next Generation Electric

498

Quality Jobs Program (Louisiana) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Quality Jobs Program (Louisiana) Quality Jobs Program (Louisiana) Quality Jobs Program (Louisiana) < Back Eligibility Commercial Industrial Investor-Owned Utility Nonprofit Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State Louisiana Program Type Corporate Tax Incentive Rebate Program Provider Louisiana Economic Development The Quality Jobs Program provides a cash rebate to companies that create well-paid jobs and promote economic development. Benefits include a 5-6% cash rebate of annual gross payroll for new, direct jobs for up to ten years, or up to 1.5 investment tax credit for qualified expenses. Business must be in one of the following industries: Bioscience, Manufacturing, Software, Environmental Technology, Food

499

Post-test analysis of dryout test 7B' of the W-1 Sodium Loop Safety Facility Experiment with the SABRE-2P code. [LMFBR  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

An understanding of conditions that may cause sodium boiling and boiling propagation that may lead to dryout and fuel failure is crucial in liquid-metal fast-breeder reactor safety. In this study, the SABRE-2P subchannel analysis code has been used to analyze the ultimate transient of the in-core W-1 Sodium Loop Safety Facility experiment. This code has a 3-D simple nondynamic boiling model which is able to predict the flow instability which caused dryout. In other analyses dryout has been predicted for out-of-core test bundles and so this study provides additional confirmation of the model.

Rose, S.D.; Dearing, J.F.

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

500

Safety, Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Safety, Security Safety, Security Safety, Security LANL's mission is to develop and apply science and technology to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. nuclear deterrent; reduce global threats; and solve other emerging national security and energy challenges. Contact Operator Los Alamos National Laboratory (505) 667-5061 We do not compromise safety for personal, programmatic, or operational reasons. Safety: we integrate safety, security, and environmental concerns into every step of our work Our commitments We conduct our work safely and responsibly to achieve our mission. We ensure a safe and healthful environment for workers, contractors, visitors, and other on-site personnel. We protect the health, safety, and welfare of the general public. We do not compromise safety for personal, programmatic, or