Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "joaquin basin onshore" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

California - San Joaquin Basin Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Production from Reserves (Million Barrels) California - San Joaquin Basin Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Estimated Production from Reserves (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0...

2

California - San Joaquin Basin Onshore Coalbed Methane Proved...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

San Joaquin Basin Onshore Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 0 0 0 0 2010's...

3

California - San Joaquin Basin Onshore Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels) Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels) California - San Joaquin Basin Onshore Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 77 1980's 81 57 124 117 105 120 109 107 101 95 1990's 86 75 83 85 75 80 80 82 58 60 2000's 64 52 68 78 95 112 100 103 97 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Natural Gas Liquids Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 CA, San Joaquin Basin Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Proved Reserves Natural Gas Liquids Proved Reserves as of Dec.

4

California - San Joaquin Basin Onshore Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas,  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) California - San Joaquin Basin Onshore Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 2,253 1980's 2,713 2,664 2,465 2,408 2,270 2,074 2,006 2,033 1,947 1,927 1990's 1,874 1,818 1,738 1,676 1,386 1,339 1,304 1,494 1,571 1,685 2000's 1,665 1,463 1,400 1,365 1,549 2,041 1,701 1,749 1,632 2,002 2010's 1,949 2,179 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014

5

California - San Joaquin Basin Onshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) California - San Joaquin Basin Onshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 4,037 1980's 4,434 4,230 4,058 3,964 3,808 3,716 3,404 3,229 3,033 2,899 1990's 2,775 2,703 2,511 2,425 2,130 2,018 1,864 2,012 2,016 2,021 2000's 2,413 2,298 2,190 2,116 2,306 2,831 2,470 2,430 2,249 2,609 2010's 2,447 2,685 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Wet After Lease Separation, as of Dec.

6

California - Los Angeles Basin Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Production from Reserves (Million Barrels) California - Los Angeles Basin Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Estimated Production from Reserves (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0...

7

California - Los Angeles Basin Onshore Coalbed Methane Proved...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

Los Angeles Basin Onshore Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 0 0 0 0 2010's...

8

California - Los Angeles Basin Onshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) California - Los Angeles Basin Onshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 176 1980's 207 163 104 115 163 188 149 155 158 141 1990's 110 120 103 108 108 115 112 146 154 174 2000's 204 195 218 196 184 186 161 154 81 91 2010's 92 102 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Wet After Lease Separation, as of Dec. 31 CA, Los Angeles Basin Onshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of

9

California - Los Angeles Basin Onshore Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) California - Los Angeles Basin Onshore Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 1 1980's 0 1 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 1990's 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 2000's 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2010's 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Nonassociated Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Wet After Lease Separation, as of Dec. 31 CA, Los Angeles Basin Onshore Nonassociated Natural Gas Proved

10

California - Los Angeles Basin Onshore Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) California - Los Angeles Basin Onshore Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 255 178 163 1980's 193 154 96 107 156 181 142 148 151 137 1990's 106 115 97 102 103 111 109 141 149 168 2000's 193 187 207 187 174 176 153 144 75 84 2010's 87 97 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 CA, Los Angeles Basin Onshore Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves as of 12/31 (Summary)

11

CA, San Joaquin Basin Onshore Proved Nonproducing Reserves  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

117 146 210 163 226 214 1996-2013 Lease Condensate (million bbls) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1998-2013 Total Gas (billion cu ft) 233 401 359 319 81 96 1996-2013 Nonassociated Gas (billion cu ft)...

12

CA, San Joaquin Basin Onshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2,249 2,609 2,447 2,685 1,650 1,574 1979-2013 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 617 607 498 506 269 245 1979-2013 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After...

13

CA, San Joaquin Basin Onshore Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

,632 2,002 1,949 2,179 1,381 1,329 1979-2013 Adjustments -4 -2 2 907 -594 -19 1979-2013 Revision Increases 142 95 467 1,382 319 126 1979-2013 Revision Decreases 217 97 367 1,892...

14

CA, San Joaquin Basin Onshore Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

2,128 2,469 2,321 2,590 1,550 1,460 1977-2013 Adjustments -8 2 4 902 -574 -55 1977-2013 Revision Increases 239 180 488 1,444 379 223 1977-2013 Revision Decreases 327 148 427 1,854...

15

CA, San Joaquin Basin Onshore Nonassociated Natural Gas Proved...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

617 607 498 506 269 245 1979-2013 Adjustments 3 1 -3 -12 58 -20 1979-2013 Revision Increases 111 96 47 116 84 115 1979-2013 Revision Decreases 128 59 84 31 120 73 1979-2013 Sales 1...

16

California - Los Angeles Basin Onshore Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas,  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) California - Los Angeles Basin Onshore Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 175 1980's 207 162 103 114 162 185 149 155 158 141 1990's 110 120 100 108 108 115 112 143 153 174 2000's 203 194 218 196 184 186 161 154 81 91 2010's 92 102 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Wet After Lease

17

The onshore northeast Brazilian rift basins: An early Neocomian aborted rift system  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Early Cretaceous rift basins of northeastern Brazil illustrate key three-dimensional geometries of intracontinental rift systems, controlled mainly by the basement structures. These basins were formed and then abandoned during the early extension associated with the north-south-propagating separation of South America and Africa. During the early Neocomian, extensional deformation jumped from the easternmost basins (group 1: Sergipe Alagoas and Gabon basins; group 2: Reconcavo, Tucano, and Jatoba basins) to the west, forming a series of northeast-trending intracratonic basins (group 3: Araripe, Rio do Peixe, Iguatu, Malhada Vermelha, Lima Campos, and Potiguar basins). The intracratonic basins of groups 2 and 3 consist of asymmetric half-grabens separated by basement highs, transfer faults, and/or accommodation zones. These basins are typically a few tens of kilometers wide and trend northeast-southwest, roughly perpendicular to the main extension direction during the early Neocomian. Preexisting upper crustal weakness zones, like the dominantly northeast-southwest-trending shear zones of the Brazilian orogeny, controlled the development of intracrustal listric normal faults. Internal transverse structures such as transfer faults (Reconcavo basin and onshore Potiguar basin) and accommodation zones (onshore Potiguar basin and Araripe basin) were also controlled by the local basement structural framework. Transverse megafaults and lithostructural associations controlled the three main rift trends. The megashear zones of Pernanbuco (Brazil)-Ngaundere (Africa) apparently behaved like a huge accommodation zone, balancing extensional deformation along the Reconcavo-Jatoba/Sergipe Alagoas-Gabon trends with simultaneous extension along the Araripe-Potiguar trend. The Sergipe Alagoas-Gabon trend and the Potiguar basin represent the site of continued evolution into a marginal open basin following early Neocomian deformation.

Matos, R. (Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY (USA))

1990-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

18

Hydrologic sensitivities of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River basin, California, to global warming  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The hydrologic sensitivities of four medium-sized mountainous catchments in the Sacramento and San Joaquin River basins to long-term global warming were analyzed. The hydrologic response of these catchments, all of which are dominated by spring snowmelt runoff, were simulated by the coupling of the snowmelt and the soil moisture accounting models of the U.S. National Weather Service River Forecast System. In all four catchments the global warming pattern, which was indexed to CO{sub 2} doubling scenarios simulated by three (global) general circulation models, produced a major seasonal shift in the snow accumulation pattern. Under the alternative climate scenarios more winter precipitation fell as rain instead of snow, and winter runoff increased while spring snowmelt runoff decreased. In addition, large increases in the annual flood maxima were simulated, primarily due to an increase in rain-on-snow events, with the time of occurrence of many large floods shifting from spring to winter.

Lettenmaier, D.P. (Univ. of Washington, Seattle (USA)); Gan, Thian Yew (Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok (Thailand))

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

19

A preliminary sub-basin scale evaluation framework of site suitability for onshore aquifer-based CO{sub 2} storage in China  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Development of a reliable, broadly applicable framework for the identification and suitability evaluation of potential CO{sub 2} storage sites is essential before large-scale deployment of carbon dioxide capture and geological storage (CCS) can commence. In this study, a sub-basin scale evaluation framework was developed to assess the suitability of potential onshore deep saline aquifers for CO{sub 2} storage in China. The methodology, developed in consultation with experts from the academia and the petroleum industry in China, is based on a multi-criteria analysis (MCA) framework that considers four objectives: (1) storage optimization, in terms of storage capacity and injectivity; (2) risk minimization and storage security; (3) environmental restrictions regarding surface and subsurface use; and (4) economic considerations. The framework is designed to provide insights into both the suitability of potential aquifer storage sites as well as the priority for early deployment of CCS with existing CO{sub 2} sources. Preliminary application of the framework, conducted using GIS-based evaluation tools revealed that 18% of onshore aquifer sites with a combined CO{sub 2} storage capacity of 746 gigatons are considered to exhibit very high suitability, and 11% of onshore aquifer sites with a total capacity of 290 gigatons exhibit very high priority opportunities for implementation. These onshore aquifer sites may provide promising opportunities for early large-scale CCS deployment and contribute to CO{sub 2} mitigation in China for many decades.

Wei, Ning; Li, Xiaochun; Wang, Ying; Dahowski, Robert T.; Davidson, Casie L.; Bromhal Grant S.

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

20

Resource Assessment of the In-Place and Potentially Recoverable Deep Natural Gas Resource of the Onshore Interior Salt Basins, North Central and Northeastern Gulf of Mexico  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The objectives of the study are: to perform resource assessment of the in-place deep (>15,000 ft) natural gas resource of the onshore interior salt basins of the North Central and Northeastern Gulf of Mexico areas through petroleum system identification, characterization and modeling and to use the petroleum system based resource assessment to estimate the volume of the in-place deep gas resource that is potentially recoverable and to identify those areas in the interior salt basins with high potential to recover commercial quantities of the deep gas resource. The principal research effort for Year 1 of the project is data compilation and petroleum system identification. The research focus for the first nine (9) months of Year 1 is on data compilation and for the remainder of the year the emphasis is on petroleum system identification.

Ernest A. Mancini; Donald A. Goddard

2004-10-28T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "joaquin basin onshore" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

RESOURCE ASSESSMENT OF THE IN-PLACE AND POTENTIALLY RECOVERABLE DEEP NATURAL GAS RESOURCE OF THE ONSHORE INTERIOR SALT BASINS, NORTH CENTRAL AND NORTHEASTERN GULF OF MEXICO  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The University of Alabama and Louisiana State University have undertaken a cooperative 3-year, advanced subsurface methodology resource assessment project, involving petroleum system identification, characterization and modeling, to facilitate exploration for a potential major source of natural gas that is deeply buried (below 15,000 feet) in the onshore interior salt basins of the North Central and Northeastern Gulf of Mexico areas. The project is designed to assist in the formulation of advanced exploration strategies for funding and maximizing the recovery from deep natural gas domestic resources at reduced costs and risks and with minimum impact. The results of the project should serve to enhance exploration efforts by domestic companies in their search for new petroleum resources, especially those deeply buried (below 15,000 feet) natural gas resources, and should support the domestic industry's endeavor to provide an increase in reliable and affordable supplies of fossil fuels. The principal research effort for Year 1 of the project is data compilation and petroleum system identification. The research focus for the first nine (9) months of Year 1 is on data compilation and for the remainder of the year the emphasis is on petroleum system identification. The objectives of the study are: to perform resource assessment of the in-place deep (>15,000 ft) natural gas resource of the onshore interior salt basins of the North Central and Northeastern Gulf of Mexico areas through petroleum system identification, characterization and modeling and to use the petroleum system based resource assessment to estimate the volume of the in-place deep gas resource that is potentially recoverable and to identify those areas in the interior salt basins with high potential to recover commercial quantities of the deep gas resource. The project objectives will be achieved through a 3-year effort. First, emphasis is on petroleum system identification and characterization in the North Louisiana Salt Basin, the Mississippi Interior Salt Basin, the Manila Sub-basin and the Conecuh Sub-basin of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida panhandle. This task includes identification of the petroleum systems in these basins and the characterization of the overburden, source, reservoir and seal rocks of the petroleum systems and of the associated petroleum traps. Second, emphasis is on petroleum system modeling. This task includes the assessment of the timing of deep (>15,000 ft) gas generation, expulsion, migration, entrapment and alteration (thermal cracking of oil to gas). Third, emphasis is on resource assessment. This task includes the volumetric calculation of the total in-place hydrocarbon resource generated, the determination of the volume of the generated hydrocarbon resource that is classified as deep (>15,000 ft) gas, the estimation of the volume of deep gas that was expelled, migrated and entrapped, and the calculation of the potential volume of gas in deeply buried (>15,000 ft) reservoirs resulting from the process of thermal cracking of liquid hydrocarbons and their transformation to gas in the reservoir. Fourth, emphasis is on identifying those areas in the onshore interior salt basins with high potential to recover commercial quantities of the deep gas resource.

Ernest A. Mancini

2004-04-16T23:59:59.000Z

22

LAKE COLUSA SAN JOAQUIN  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

DORADO AMADOR SONOMA NAPA YOLO CALAVERAS SAN JOAQUIN TUOLUMNE MONO ALPINE MARIPOSA MERCED MADERA FRESNO LAKE COLUSA SUTTER YUBA NEVADA SIERRA PLACER EL DORADO AMADOR SONOMA NAPA YOLO CALAVERAS SAN JOAQUIN

23

wind onshore | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

onshore onshore Dataset Summary Description This dataset highlights trends in financing terms for U.S. renewable energy projects that closed financing between Q3 2009 and Q3 2010. Information tracked includes debt interest rates, equity returns, financial structure applied, PPA duration, and other information. NREL's Renewable Energy Finance Tracking Initiative (REFTI) tracks renewable energy project financing terms by technology and project size. The intelligence gathered is intended to reveal industry trends and to inform input assumptions for models. Source NREL Date Released March 27th, 2011 (3 years ago) Date Updated Unknown Keywords biomass financial geothermal project finance solar PV wind onshore Data application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet icon RE Project Finance Trends Q3 2009 - Q3 2010 (xlsx, 309.2 KiB)

24

Recoverable Resource Estimate of Identified Onshore Geopressured...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Recoverable Resource Estimate of Identified Onshore Geopressured Geothermal Energy in Texas and Louisiana AAPG 2012 Annual Convention and Exhibition Ariel Esposito and Chad...

25

Chattanooga Eagle Ford Western Gulf TX-LA-MS Salt Basin Uinta Basin  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Western Western Gulf TX-LA-MS Salt Basin Uinta Basin Devonian (Ohio) Marcellus Utica Bakken*** Avalon- Bone Spring San Joaquin Basin Monterey Santa Maria, Ventura, Los Angeles Basins Monterey- Temblor Pearsall Tuscaloosa Big Horn Basin Denver Basin Powder River Basin Park Basin Niobrara* Mowry Niobrara* Heath** Manning Canyon Appalachian Basin Antrim Barnett Bend New Albany Woodford Barnett- Woodford Lewis Hilliard- Baxter- Mancos Excello- Mulky Fayetteville Floyd- Neal Gammon Cody Haynesville- Bossier Hermosa Mancos Pierre Conasauga Michigan Basin Ft. Worth Basin Palo Duro Basin Permian Basin Illinois Basin Anadarko Basin Greater Green River Basin Cherokee Platform San Juan Basin Williston Basin Black Warrior Basin A r d m o r e B a s i n Paradox Basin Raton Basin Montana Thrust Belt Marfa Basin Valley & Ridge Province Arkoma Basin Forest

26

European Wind Atlas: Onshore | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

European Wind Atlas: Onshore European Wind Atlas: Onshore Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name: European Wind Atlas: Onshore Focus Area: Renewable Energy Topics: Potentials & Scenarios Website: www.windatlas.dk/Europe/landmap.html Equivalent URI: cleanenergysolutions.org/content/european-wind-atlas-onshore,http://cl Language: English Policies: Deployment Programs DeploymentPrograms: Technical Assistance This is a European on-shore wind resources at 50 meters of altitude map, developed by Riso National Laboratory in 1989. The map shows the so-called generalised wind climate over Europe, also sometimes referred to as the regional wind climate or simply the wind atlas. In such a map, the influences of local topography have been removed and only the variations on

27

California--onshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

onshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet) California--onshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1...

28

Texas--RRC District 4 Onshore Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

4 Onshore Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Texas--RRC District 4 Onshore Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3...

29

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

#12;San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District Best Available Control Technology.4.2 #12;San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control Distri RECEIVED ~ 2 ED ECEIVED www.valleyalr.org SJVAPCD-2370·(661)326-6900"FAX(661)326-6985 #12;San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District TITLE V MODIFICATION

30

CA, Los Angeles Basin Onshore Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

75 84 87 97 93 86 1977-2013 Adjustments 2 5 5 7 11 -9 1977-2013 Revision Increases 1 35 9 11 8 8 1977-2013 Revision Decreases 66 24 5 4 17 2 1977-2013 Sales 1 0 0 0 0 35 2000-2013...

31

CA, Los Angeles Basin Onshore Nonassociated Natural Gas Proved...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2013 Adjustments 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2013 Revision Increases 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2013 Revision Decreases 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2013 Sales 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2013 Acquisitions 0...

32

CA, Los Angeles Basin Onshore Proved Nonproducing Reserves  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

31 29 66 69 55 60 1996-2013 Lease Condensate (million bbls) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1998-2013 Total Gas (billion cu ft) 8 12 21 23 16 16 1996-2013 Nonassociated Gas (billion cu ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0...

33

CA, Los Angeles Basin Onshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

81 91 92 102 98 90 1979-2013 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2013 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 81 91 92 102...

34

CA, Los Angeles Basin Onshore Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

81 91 92 102 98 90 1979-2013 Adjustments 4 4 3 6 12 -9 1979-2013 Revision Increases 1 38 9 12 9 9 1979-2013 Revision Decreases 71 25 5 4 18 3 1979-2013 Sales 1 0 0 0 0 37 2000-2013...

35

Historic, Recent, and Future Subsidence, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, USA  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Joaquin Delta, California, USA. Wetlands 29:372386. HeimJoaquin Delta, California, USA. San Francisco Estuary andJoaquin Delta, California, USA Steven J. Deverel 1 and David

Deverel, Steven J; Leighton, David A

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

36

,"California Onshore Natural Gas Processed in California (Million...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Onshore Natural Gas Processed in California (Million Cubic Feet)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Lates...

37

California Onshore Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production Extracted...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Plant Liquids Production Extracted in California (Million Cubic Feet) California Onshore Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production Extracted in California (Million Cubic Feet) Decade...

38

California Onshore Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted in California...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Total Liquids Extracted in California (Thousand Barrels) California Onshore Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted in California (Thousand Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3...

39

Louisiana - South Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Estimated...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Estimated Production from Reserves (Million Barrels) Louisiana - South Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Estimated Production from Reserves (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0...

40

Texas - RRC District 2 Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Estimated...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Estimated Production from Reserves (Million Barrels) Texas - RRC District 2 Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Estimated Production from Reserves (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "joaquin basin onshore" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

California - Coastal Region Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Production from Reserves (Million Barrels) California - Coastal Region Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Estimated Production from Reserves (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0...

42

Louisiana--South Onshore Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves (Billion...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

company data. Release Date: 1242014 Next Release Date: 12312015 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 LA, South Onshore Coalbed Methane Proved...

43

Louisiana--South Onshore Coalbed Methane Production (Billion...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

company data. Release Date: 1242014 Next Release Date: 12312015 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Estimated Production LA, South Onshore Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves,...

44

Conservation tillage production systems compared in San Joaquin Valley cotton  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

in San Joaquin Valley cotton by Jeffrey P. Mitchell, Danielfor 25% or more of overall cotton production costs. Thesesuccessfully elsewhere in the Cotton Belt may be a viable

Mitchell, Jeffrey; Munk, Dan; Prys, Bob; Klonsky, Karen; Wroble, Jon; De Moura, Rich

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

45

Property:PotentialOnshoreWindGeneration | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

PotentialOnshoreWindGeneration PotentialOnshoreWindGeneration Jump to: navigation, search Property Name PotentialOnshoreWindGeneration Property Type Quantity Description The area of potential onshore wind in a place. Use this type to express a quantity of energy. The default unit for energy on OpenEI is the Kilowatt hour (kWh), which is 3,600,000 Joules. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_of_energy It's possible types are Watt hours - 1000 Wh, Watt hour, Watthour Kilowatt hours - 1 kWh, Kilowatt hour, Kilowatthour Megawatt hours - 0.001 MWh, Megawatt hour, Megawatthour Gigawatt hours - 0.000001 GWh, Gigawatt hour, Gigawatthour Joules - 3600000 J, Joules, joules Pages using the property "PotentialOnshoreWindGeneration" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25)

46

Cement distribution in a carbonate reservoir: recognition of a palaeo oilwater contact and its relationship to reservoir quality in the Humbly Grove field, onshore, UK  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The distribution of mineral cements, total porosity, microporosity and permeability have been determined for the Humbly Grove oolitic carbonate reservoir (Middle Jurassic Great Oolite Formation, Weald Basin, onshore UK) using a combination of optical petrography, electron microscopy, fluid inclusion analysis, quantitative XRD, wireline data analysis and core analysis data. Grainstone reservoir facies have porosities ranging between 5 and 24%, but are mostly between 11 and 24%. Permeabilities vary from Jurassic reservoirs of the Weald Basin.

Emma C Heasley; Richard H Worden; James P Hendry

2000-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

47

Clean Cities: San Joaquin Valley Clean Cities coalition  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Joaquin Valley Clean Cities Coalition Joaquin Valley Clean Cities Coalition The San Joaquin Valley Clean Cities coalition works with vehicle fleets, fuel providers, community leaders, and other stakeholders to reduce petroleum use in transportation. San Joaquin Valley Clean Cities coalition Contact Information Linda Urata 661-342-8262 iwantcleanair@aim.com Spencer Schluter 661-599-9454 scschluter@gmail.com Coalition Website Clean Cities Coordinators Coord Linda Urata Coord Coord Spencer Schluter Coord Photo of Linda Urata In 2000, Linda Urata became the coordinator of the San Joaquin Valley Clean Cities coalition. Urata works at Kern Council of Governments in Bakersfield, California. There, she coordinates the Kern Energy Watch program, which is a local government and utility company partnership effort

48

WEDNESDAY: Chu, Salazar, Vilsack to Participate in Onshore Renewable Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Chu, Salazar, Vilsack to Participate in Onshore Chu, Salazar, Vilsack to Participate in Onshore Renewable Energy Workshop WEDNESDAY: Chu, Salazar, Vilsack to Participate in Onshore Renewable Energy Workshop February 8, 2011 - 12:00am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC --- On Wednesday, February 9th the Department of Interior will host an onshore renewable energy workshop. The two-day conference will bring together stakeholders from across the government, renewable energy industry, and conservation community to discuss the administration's efforts to rapidly and responsibly stand-up renewable energy projects on our nation's public lands. Secretary of Energy Steven Chu, Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar, and Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack will open the workshop with a roundtable discussion about the Administration's work to build a clean

49

Property:PotentialOnshoreWindCapacity | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

PotentialOnshoreWindCapacity PotentialOnshoreWindCapacity Jump to: navigation, search Property Name PotentialOnshoreWindCapacity Property Type Quantity Description The nameplate capacity technical potential from Onshore Wind for a particular place. Use this property to express potential electric energy generation, such as Nameplate Capacity. The default unit is megawatts (MW). For spatial capacity, use property Volume. Acceptable units (and their conversions) are: 1 MW,MWe,megawatt,Megawatt,MegaWatt,MEGAWATT,megawatts,Megawatt,MegaWatts,MEGAWATT,MEGAWATTS 1000 kW,kWe,KW,kilowatt,KiloWatt,KILOWATT,kilowatts,KiloWatts,KILOWATT,KILOWATTS 1000000 W,We,watt,watts,Watt,Watts,WATT,WATTS 1000000000 mW,milliwatt,milliwatts,MILLIWATT,MILLIWATTS 0.001 GW,gigawatt,gigawatts,Gigawatt,Gigawatts,GigaWatt,GigaWatts,GIGAWATT,GIGAWATTS

50

California Onshore Natural Gas Processed in California (Million...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Processed in California (Million Cubic Feet) California Onshore Natural Gas Processed in California (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6...

51

Development of onshore wind energy utilisation in Germany  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Onshore wind energy utilisation in Germany has developed very dynamically in the last decade. This has mainly been driven by the renewable energy laws that systematically support the expansion of renewable ene...

Ronald Meisel; Ren Pforte; Wolf Fichtner

2009-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

52

Texas--RRC District 2 Onshore Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Texas--RRC District 2 Onshore Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4...

53

Texas--RRC District 3 Onshore Coalbed Methane Production (Billion...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Production (Billion Cubic Feet) Texas--RRC District 3 Onshore Coalbed Methane Production (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

54

Texas--RRC District 3 Onshore Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Texas--RRC District 3 Onshore Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6...

55

Oil spill fluorosensing lidar for inclined onshore or shipboard operation  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

An oil spill detection fluorosensing lidar for onshore or shipboard operation is described. Some difficulties for its operation arise from the inclined path of rays. This is due to...

Karpicz, Renata; Dementjev, Andrej; Kuprionis, Zenonas; Pakalnis, Saulius; Westphal, Rainer; Reuter, Rainer; Gulbinas, Vidmantas

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

56

San Joaquin Final EA December 2011--Main Volume  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Final Environmental Assessment Final Environmental Assessment for Right-of-Way Maintenance in the San Joaquin Valley, California December 2011 Prepared for: Western Area Power Administration, Sierra Nevada Region San Joaquin Valley ROW Maintenance EA This page intentionally left blank San Joaquin Valley ROW Maintenance EA December 2011 iii Final EA CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION ...................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Background ............................................................................................. 1-1 1.3 Purpose and Need for Action .................................................................. 1-3

57

A Home for Everyone San Joaquin Valley Housing  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 C. Kings County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 D. Madera related to growth and development and lead to improved outcomes for California's cities and counties Joaquin Valley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 APPENDICES: DATA TABLES FOR VALLEY COUNTIES A

Tipple, Brett

58

Present-day heat flow, thermal history and tectonic subsidence of the East China Sea Basin  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, People's Republic of China b China Offshore Oil after the late Mesozoic. These basins, both onshore and offshore, have a similar age and structural

Lin, Andrew Tien-Shun

59

Oil flow resumes in war torn onshore Neutral Zone  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Oil production has resumed in the war ravaged onshore fields of the Neutral Zone between Saudi Arabia and Kuwait 1 year after the end of Persian Gulf War. Initial production of about 40,000 b/d is expected to rise to 60,000 b/d by year end. This paper reports that prior to the January-February 1991 war to oust occupying Iraqi military forces from Kuwait, the Neutral Zone's Wafra, South Umm Gudair, and South Fuwaris onshore fields produced about 135,000 b/d.

Not Available

1992-03-09T23:59:59.000Z

60

Measuring the Environmental Externalities of Onshore Wind Power  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract This article provides a brief overview of the environmental externalities that are commonly associated with the development of onshore wind-power projects. The article discusses the physical characteristics of an onshore wind farm; the nature of the positive and negative externalities, such as low-carbon electricity generation, low water consumption, noise, visual amenity, wildlife impacts; and land disruption and change. A simple description of surrogate-based and nonmarket-based methods of measuring these externalities is given. Monetary values are also reported.

A. Bergmann

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "joaquin basin onshore" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Property:PotentialOnshoreWindArea | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

PotentialOnshoreWindArea PotentialOnshoreWindArea Jump to: navigation, search Property Name PotentialOnshoreWindArea Property Type Quantity Description The area of potential onshore wind in a place. Use this type to express a quantity of two-dimensional space. The default unit is the square meter (m²). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area Acceptable units (and their conversions) are: Square Meters - 1 m²,m2,m^2,square meter,square meters,Square Meter,Square Meters,Sq. Meters,SQUARE METERS Square Kilometers - 0.000001 km²,km2,km^2,square kilometer,square kilometers,square km,square Kilometers,SQUARE KILOMETERS Square Miles - 0.000000386 mi²,mi2,mi^2,mile²,square mile,square miles,square mi,Square Miles,SQUARE MILES Square Feet - 10.7639 ft²,ft2,ft^2,square feet,square foot,FT²,FT2,FT^2,Square Feet, Square Foot

62

Texas--RRC District 2 Onshore Coalbed Methane Production (Billion...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

2 Onshore Coalbed Methane Production (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 0 0 0 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 - No Data...

63

Texas--RRC District 4 Onshore Coalbed Methane Production (Billion...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

4 Onshore Coalbed Methane Production (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 0 0 0 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 - No Data...

64

San Joaquin Valley Clean Energy Organization | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Joaquin Valley Clean Energy Organization Joaquin Valley Clean Energy Organization Jump to: navigation, search Logo: San Joaquin Valley Clean Energy Organization Name San Joaquin Valley Clean Energy Organization Place California Region Bay Area Website http://www.sjvcleanenergy.org/ Notes Builds upon existing efforts and serves as a trusted resource on clean energy for San Joaquin Valley businesses, consumers, nonprofits and local governments Coordinates 36.778261°, -119.4179324° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":36.778261,"lon":-119.4179324,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

65

Louisiana--South Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels) Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels) Louisiana--South Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 263 1980's 267 253 243 238 229 220 208 194 193 196 1990's 182 175 151 133 123 136 127 134 138 142 2000's 159 141 107 82 66 65 65 71 64 74 2010's 68 64 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Lease Condensate Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 LA, South Onshore Lease Condensate Proved Reserves, Reserve Changes, and Production

66

California - Coastal Region Onshore Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) California - Coastal Region Onshore Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 334 350 365 1980's 299 306 362 381 265 256 255 238 215 222 1990's 217 216 203 189 194 153 156 164 106 192 2000's 234 177 190 167 189 268 206 205 146 163 2010's 173 165 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 CA, Coastal Region Onshore Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves as of 12/31 (Summary)

67

California - Coastal Region Onshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) California - Coastal Region Onshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 395 1980's 330 325 384 405 284 277 275 255 232 238 1990's 232 231 215 201 205 163 168 176 118 233 2000's 244 185 197 174 196 277 214 212 151 169 2010's 180 173 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Wet After Lease Separation, as of Dec. 31 CA, Coastal Region Onshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec.

68

Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act of 1987 (FOOGLRA) | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Page Page Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon » Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act of 1987 (FOOGLRA) Jump to: navigation, search Statute Name Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act of 1987 (FOOGLRA) Year 1987 Url FederalOnshore1987.jpg Description Another amendment to the Mineral Leasing Act, The Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act of 1987 granted the USDA Forest Service the authority to make decisions and implement regulations concerning the leasing of public domain minerals on National Forest System lands containing oil and gas. References Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act of 1987 (FOOGLRA)[1] Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act of 1987 (FOOGLRA) (30 U.S.C. § 181 et seq.) - Another amendment to the Mineral Leasing Act, The Federal

69

Evaluation of Global Onshore Wind Energy Potential and Generation Costs  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

(2)Where Et is the wind technical potential (kWh/year), A is the area of each grid cell (km(2)), ?1 is the availability factor, ?2 is the array efficiency, ? is average installed power density (MW km2), and ((A?)/(1.5)) represents the number of turbines (1.5 MW GE turbine) in a given grid cell. ... If wind is to play a large role, lower quality wind resources would need to be used, and a bias against the highest speed winds can be less important. ... EEA. Europes Onshore and Offshore Wind Energy Potential. ...

Yuyu Zhou; Patrick Luckow; Steven J. Smith; Leon Clarke

2012-06-20T23:59:59.000Z

70

Maps of Selected State Subdivisions  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Crude Oil, Natural Gas, and Natural Gas Liquids Crude Oil, Natural Gas, and Natural Gas Liquids Proved Reserves Summary Maps of Selected State Subdivisions Map 1: Alaska Map 2: California Map 3: Louisiana Map 4: New Mexico Map 5: Texas Map 6: Western Planning Area, Gulf of Mexico Map 7: Central Planning Area, Gulf of Mexico Map 8: Eastern Planning Area, Gulf of Mexico Map 1: Alaska AK 50 - North Onshore and Offshore AK 10 - South Onshore AK 05 - South State Offshore AK 00 - South Federal Offshore Map 2: California CA 50 - Coastal Region Onshore CA 90 - Los Angeles Basin Onshore CA 10 - San Joaquin Basin Onshore

71

Journal of Geodynamics Offshore Oligo-Miocene volcanic fields within the Corsica-Liguria Basin  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Journal of Geodynamics Offshore Oligo-Miocene volcanic fields within the Corsica-Liguria Basin Mediterranean) have been affected by a geochemically diverse igneous activity, offshore and onshore, since to our initial project. Key-Words: Mediterranean, Ligurian margins and Basin, Offshore Corsica, Miocene

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

72

San Joaquin County, California: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Joaquin County, California: Energy Resources Joaquin County, California: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 37.9175935°, -121.1710389° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":37.9175935,"lon":-121.1710389,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

73

San Joaquin, California: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Joaquin, California: Energy Resources Joaquin, California: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 36.6066162°, -120.1890447° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":36.6066162,"lon":-120.1890447,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

74

Louisiana - South Onshore Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Louisiana - South Onshore Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 18,580 17,755 13,994 1980's 13,026 12,645 11,801 11,142 10,331 9,808 9,103 8,693 8,654 8,645 1990's 8,171 7,504 6,693 5,932 6,251 5,648 5,704 5,855 5,698 5,535 2000's 5,245 5,185 4,224 3,745 3,436 3,334 3,335 3,323 2,799 2,844 2010's 2,876 2,519 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 LA, South Onshore Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves

75

California - Coastal Region Onshore Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) California - Coastal Region Onshore Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 307 1980's 265 265 325 344 256 254 261 243 220 233 1990's 228 220 196 135 145 109 120 129 116 233 2000's 244 185 197 173 188 269 208 211 150 168 2010's 178 172 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Wet After Lease

76

EA-1697: San Joaquin Valley Right-of-Way Project, California | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

97: San Joaquin Valley Right-of-Way Project, California 97: San Joaquin Valley Right-of-Way Project, California EA-1697: San Joaquin Valley Right-of-Way Project, California Summary DOE's Western Area Power Administration is preparing this EA to evaluate the environmental impacts of right-of-way maintenance (including facility inspection and repair, vegetation management, and equipment upgrades for transmission lines and associated rights-or-way, access roads, substations, and a maintenance facility) in the San Joaquin Valley in California. Public Comment Opportunities No public comment opportunities available at this time. Documents Available for Download December 2, 2011 EA-1697: Finding of No Significant Impact Right-of-Way Maintenance in the San Joaquin Valley, California December 2, 2011 EA-1697: Final Environmental Assessment

77

Tular Lake Field, Kings County, California - a significant onshore development  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Tulare Lake field is located in Kings County, California, on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley and 10 mi east of the Kettleman Hills (North Dome) field and 30 mi souuheast of the city of Coalinga. The field was discovered by Husky Oil Co. (Marathon) in October 1981 with the completion of the Boswell 22-16, Sec. 16, T22S, R20E from sands in the Burbank formation of Oligocene geologic age. Chevron USA offset the Husky discovery well with the completion of the Salyer 678X, Sec. 8, T22S, R20E, in May 1983. Both Chevron and Husky have continued an orderly development of the field, and to date Chevron has 9 producing wells and Husky 10 producing wells. Production is found in the Burbank formation at a vertical depth below 12,800 ft. The entrapment of hydrocarbons is caused by a low amplitude, seismically subtle, anticlinal fold trending northwest/southeast. Isochore maps of the Burbank formation show that stratigraphy is important in the distribution of the four producing sand intervals. Oil gravities form the sands vary 39/sup 0/ API to 51/sup 0/ API and the GOR ranges from 1050 to over 5500. As of January 1, 1984, the field has a cumulative production of 1.7 million bbl of oil and 3.5 billion ft/sup 3/ of gas.

Lindblom, R.G.; Waldron, J.M.

1985-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

78

Environmental sensor networks and continuous data quality assurance to manage salinity within a highly regulated river basin  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper describes a new approach to environmental decision support for salinity management in the San Joaquin Basin of California that focuses on web-based data sharing using YSI Econet technology and continuous data quality management using a novel software tool, Aquarius.

Quinn, N.W.T.; Ortega, R.; Holm, L.

2010-01-05T23:59:59.000Z

79

Louisiana - South Onshore Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Louisiana - South Onshore Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 12,276 1980's 11,273 11,178 10,364 9,971 9,162 8,328 7,843 7,644 7,631 7,661 1990's 7,386 6,851 6,166 5,570 5,880 5,446 5,478 5,538 5,336 5,259 2000's 4,954 4,859 3,968 3,506 3,168 3,051 3,058 2,960 2,445 2,463 2010's 2,496 2,125 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages:

80

Louisiana - South Onshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Louisiana - South Onshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 14,580 1980's 13,407 13,049 12,153 11,553 10,650 10,120 9,416 9,024 8,969 8,934 1990's 8,492 7,846 7,019 6,219 6,558 6,166 6,105 6,137 5,966 5,858 2000's 5,447 5,341 4,395 3,874 3,557 3,478 3,473 3,463 2,916 2,969 2010's 2,995 2,615 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Wet After Lease Separation, as of Dec.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "joaquin basin onshore" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Biodegradation of Fuel Oil Hydrocarbons in Soil Contaminated by Oily Wastes Produced During Onshore Drilling Operations  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The petroleum industry generates high amount of oily wastes during drilling, storage and refining operations. Onshore drilling operations produce oil based wastes, typically 100150m-3 well. The drilling cuttings...

Qaude-Henri Chaneau; Jean-Louis Morel; Jean Oudot

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

82

San Joaquin Solar 1 & 2 Solar Power Plant | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

San Joaquin Solar 1 & 2 Solar Power Plant San Joaquin Solar 1 & 2 Solar Power Plant Jump to: navigation, search Name San Joaquin Solar 1 & 2 Solar Power Plant Facility San Joaquin Solar 1 & 2 Sector Solar Facility Type Hybrid Developer Martifer Renewables Location Fresno County, California Coordinates 36.9858984°, -119.2320784° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":36.9858984,"lon":-119.2320784,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

83

Water Management Strategies for the San Joaquin Valley and San Francisco Bay Area  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

i Water Management Strategies for the San Joaquin Valley and San Francisco Bay Area: an Engineering in Water Resource Management ............. 3 CALVIN Model Overview ...................................................... 26 Changes in Delivery and Scarcity Costs .................................. 35 Environmental Water

Lund, Jay R.

84

A Conceptual Model of Sedimentation in the SacramentoSan Joaquin Delta  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

early 20th century (e.g. , Yolo Bypass) provide a simi- larsource of sedi- ment was the Yolo Bypass (YOL, 28% of theSan Joaquin River. The Yolo Bypass diverts high Sacramento

Schoellhamer, David H.; Wright, Scott A.; Drexler, Judy

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

85

Elements of an environmental decision support system for seasonal wetland salt management in a river basin subjected to water quality regulation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Seasonally managed wetlands in the Grasslands Basin on the west-side of California's San Joaquin Valley provide food and shelter for migratory wildfowl during winter months and sport for waterfowl hunters during the annual duck season. Surface water supply to these wetlands contain salt which, when drained to the San Joaquin River during the annual drawdown period, can negatively impact water quality and cause concern to downstream agricultural riparian water diverters. Recent environmental regulation, limiting discharges salinity to the San Joaquin River and primarily targeting agricultural non-point sources, now also targets return flows from seasonally managed wetlands. Real-time water quality management has been advocated as a means of continuously matching salt loads discharged from agricultural, wetland and municipal operations to the assimilative capacity of the San Joaquin River. Past attempts to build environmental monitoring and decision support systems (EDSS's) to implement this concept have enjoyed limited success for reasons that are discussed in this paper. These reasons are discussed in the context of more general challenges facing the successful implementation of a comprehensive environmental monitoring, modelling and decision support system for the San Joaquin River Basin.

Quinn, N.W.T.

2009-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

86

Reducing Onshore Natural Gas and Oil Exploration and Production Impacts Using a Broad-Based Stakeholder Approach  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Never before has the reduction of oil and gas exploration and production impacts been as important as it is today for operators, regulators, non-governmental organizations and individual landowners. Collectively, these stakeholders are keenly interested in the potential benefits from implementing effective environmental impact reducing technologies and practices. This research project strived to gain input and insight from such a broad array of stakeholders in order to identify approaches with the potential to satisfy their diverse objectives. The research team examined three of the most vital issue categories facing onshore domestic production today: (1) surface damages including development in urbanized areas, (2) impacts to wildlife (specifically greater sage grouse), and (3) air pollution, including its potential contribution to global climate change. The result of the research project is a LINGO (Low Impact Natural Gas and Oil) handbook outlining approaches aimed at avoiding, minimizing, or mitigating environmental impacts. The handbook identifies technical solutions and approaches which can be implemented in a practical and feasible manner to simultaneously achieve a legitimate balance between environmental protection and fluid mineral development. It is anticipated that the results of this research will facilitate informed planning and decision making by management agencies as well as producers of oil and natural gas. In 2008, a supplemental task was added for the researchers to undertake a 'Basin Initiative Study' that examines undeveloped and/or underdeveloped oil and natural gas resources on a regional or geologic basin scope to stimulate more widespread awareness and development of domestic resources. Researchers assessed multi-state basins (or plays), exploring state initiatives, state-industry partnerships and developing strategies to increase U.S. oil and gas supplies while accomplishing regional economic and environmental goals.

Amy Childers

2011-03-30T23:59:59.000Z

87

Impounded Marshes on Subsided Islands: Simulated Vertical Accretion, Processes, and Effects, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, CA USA  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

southern Great Plains, USA). Aquat Bot 74:97108. Atwaterof southwestern Florida. USA Mangroves Salt Marshes DeverelJoaquin Delta, California, USA. San Franc Estuary Watershed

Deverel, Steven J.; Ingrum, Timothy; Lucero, Christina; Drexler, Judith Z.

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

88

U.S. Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Wet After Lease Separation  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Area: U.S. Federal Offshore U.S. Federal Offshore, Pacific (California) Federal Offshore, Gulf of Mexico, LA & AL Federal Offshore, Gulf of Mexico, TX Alaska Lower 48 States Alabama Arkansas California CA, Coastal Region Onshore CA, Los Angeles Basin Onshore CA, San Joaquin Basin Onshore CA, State Offshore Colorado Florida Kansas Kentucky Louisiana North Louisiana LA, South Onshore LA, State Offshore Michigan Mississippi Montana New Mexico NM, East NM, West New York North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Texas TX, RRC District 1 TX, RRC District 2 Onshore TX, RRC District 3 Onshore TX, RRC District 4 Onshore TX, RRC District 5 TX, RRC District 6 TX, RRC District 7B TX, RRC District 7C TX, RRC District 8 TX, RRC District 8A TX, RRC District 9 TX, RRC District 10 TX, State Offshore Utah Virginia West Virginia Wyoming Miscellaneous Period:

89

U.S. Lease Condensate Proved Reserves, Reserve Changes, and Production  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Area: U.S. Federal Offshore U.S. Federal Offshore, Pacific (California) Federal Offshore, Gulf of Mexico, LA & AL Federal Offshore, Gulf of Mexico, TX Alaska Lower 48 States Alabama Arkansas California CA, Coastal Region Onshore CA, Los Angeles Basin Onshore CA, San Joaquin Basin Onshore CA, State Offshore Colorado Florida Kansas Kentucky Louisiana North Louisiana LA, South Onshore LA, State Offshore Michigan Mississippi Montana Nebraska New Mexico NM, East NM, West New York North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Texas TX, RRC District 1 TX, RRC District 2 Onshore TX, RRC District 3 Onshore TX, RRC District 4 Onshore TX, RRC District 5 TX, RRC District 6 TX, RRC District 7B TX, RRC District 7C TX, RRC District 8 TX, RRC District 8A TX, RRC District 9 TX, RRC District 10 TX, State Offshore Utah West Virginia Wyoming Miscellaneous Period:

90

U.S. Nonassociated Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Wet After Lease Separation  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Area: U.S. Federal Offshore U.S. Federal Offshore, Pacific (California) Federal Offshore, Gulf of Mexico, LA & AL Federal Offshore, Gulf of Mexico, TX Alaska Lower 48 States Alabama Arkansas California CA, Coastal Region Onshore CA, Los Angeles Basin Onshore CA, San Joaquin Basin Onshore CA, State Offshore Colorado Florida Kansas Kentucky Louisiana North Louisiana LA, South Onshore LA, State Offshore Michigan Mississippi Montana Nebraska New Mexico NM, East NM, West New York North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Texas TX, RRC District 1 TX, RRC District 2 Onshore TX, RRC District 3 Onshore TX, RRC District 4 Onshore TX, RRC District 5 TX, RRC District 6 TX, RRC District 7B TX, RRC District 7C TX, RRC District 8 TX, RRC District 8A TX, RRC District 9 TX, RRC District 10 TX, State Offshore Utah Virginia West Virginia Wyoming Miscellaneous Period:

91

U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Area: U.S. Federal Offshore U.S. Federal Offshore, Pacific (California) Federal Offshore, Gulf of Mexico, LA & AL Federal Offshore, Gulf of Mexico, TX Alaska Lower 48 States Alabama Arkansas California CA, Coastal Region Onshore CA, Los Angeles Basin Onshore CA, San Joaquin Basin Onshore CA, State Offshore Colorado Florida Kansas Kentucky Louisiana North Louisiana LA, South Onshore LA, State Offshore Michigan Mississippi Montana New Mexico NM, East NM, West New York North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Texas TX, RRC District 1 TX, RRC District 2 Onshore TX, RRC District 3 Onshore TX, RRC District 4 Onshore TX, RRC District 5 TX, RRC District 6 TX, RRC District 7B TX, RRC District 7C TX, RRC District 8 TX, RRC District 8A TX, RRC District 9 TX, RRC District 10 TX, State Offshore Utah Virginia West Virginia Wyoming Miscellaneous Period:

92

U.S. Proved Nonproducing Reserves  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Area: U.S. Federal Offshore U.S. Federal Offshore, Pacific (California) Federal Offshore, Gulf of Mexico, LA & AL Federal Offshore, Gulf of Mexico, TX Alaska Lower 48 States Alabama Arkansas California CA, Coastal Region Onshore CA, Los Angeles Basin Onshore CA, San Joaquin Basin Onshore CA, State Offshore Colorado Florida Illinois Indiana Kansas Kentucky Louisiana North Louisiana LA, South Onshore LA, State Offshore Michigan Mississippi Montana Nebraska New Mexico NM, East NM, West New York North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Texas TX, RRC District 1 TX, RRC District 2 Onshore TX, RRC District 3 Onshore TX, RRC District 4 Onshore TX, RRC District 5 TX, RRC District 6 TX, RRC District 7B TX, RRC District 7C TX, RRC District 8 TX, RRC District 8A TX, RRC District 9 TX, RRC District 10 TX, State Offshore Utah Virginia West Virginia Wyoming Miscellaneous Period:

93

U.S. Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Area: U.S. Federal Offshore U.S. Federal Offshore, Pacific (California) Federal Offshore, Gulf of Mexico, LA & AL Federal Offshore, Gulf of Mexico, TX Alaska Lower 48 States Alabama Arkansas California CA, Coastal Region Onshore CA, Los Angeles Basin Onshore CA, San Joaquin Basin Onshore CA, State Offshore Colorado Florida Illinois Indiana Kansas Kentucky Louisiana North Louisiana LA, South Onshore LA, State Offshore Michigan Mississippi Montana Nebraska New Mexico NM, East NM, West North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Texas TX, RRC District 1 TX, RRC District 2 Onshore TX, RRC District 3 Onshore TX, RRC District 4 Onshore TX, RRC District 5 TX, RRC District 6 TX, RRC District 7B TX, RRC District 7C TX, RRC District 8 TX, RRC District 8A TX, RRC District 9 TX, RRC District 10 TX, State Offshore Utah West Virginia Wyoming Miscellaneous Period:

94

U.S. Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Wet After Lease  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Area: U.S. Federal Offshore U.S. Federal Offshore, Pacific (California) Federal Offshore, Gulf of Mexico, LA & AL Federal Offshore, Gulf of Mexico, TX Alaska Lower 48 States Alabama Arkansas California CA, Coastal Region Onshore CA, Los Angeles Basin Onshore CA, San Joaquin Basin Onshore CA, State Offshore Colorado Florida Kansas Kentucky Louisiana North Louisiana LA, South Onshore LA, State Offshore Michigan Mississippi Montana Nebraska New Mexico NM, East NM, West New York North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Texas TX, RRC District 1 TX, RRC District 2 Onshore TX, RRC District 3 Onshore TX, RRC District 4 Onshore TX, RRC District 5 TX, RRC District 6 TX, RRC District 7B TX, RRC District 7C TX, RRC District 8 TX, RRC District 8A TX, RRC District 9 TX, RRC District 10 TX, State Offshore Utah Virginia West Virginia Wyoming Miscellaneous Period:

95

U.S. Total Crude Oil Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Area: U.S. Total Lower 48 States Federal Offshore Federal Offshore, Pacific (California) Federal Offshore, Gulf of Mexico (Louisiana) Federal Offshore, Gulf of Mexico (Texas) Alaska Alabama Arkansas California CA, Coastal Region Onshore CA, Los Angeles Basin Onshore CA, San Joaquin Basin Onshore CA, State Offshore Colorado Florida Illinois Indiana Kansas Kentucky Louisiana North Louisiana LA, South Onshore LA, State Offshore Michigan Mississippi Montana Nebraska New Mexico NM, East NM, West North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Texas TX, RRC District 1 TX, RRC District 2 Onshore TX, RRC District 3 Onshore TX, RRC District 4 Onshore TX, RRC District 5 TX, RRC District 6 TX, RRC District 7B TX, RRC Distict 7C TX, RRC District 8 TX, RRC District 8A TX, RRC District 9 TX, RRC District 10 TX, State Offshore Utah West Virginia Wyoming Miscellaneous Period:

96

Texas - RRC District 2 Onshore Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2 Onshore Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) 2 Onshore Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Texas - RRC District 2 Onshore Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 955 1980's 921 806 780 747 661 570 517 512 428 430 1990's 407 352 308 288 299 245 252 235 204 202 2000's 115 65 70 81 76 109 118 137 72 72 2010's 134 924 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Wet After Lease

97

Texas - RRC District 4 Onshore Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

4 Onshore Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) 4 Onshore Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Texas - RRC District 4 Onshore Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 1,416 1980's 1,292 1,005 890 765 702 684 596 451 393 371 1990's 301 243 228 215 191 209 246 368 394 182 2000's 176 140 150 136 165 148 110 117 127 96 2010's 91 61 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Wet After Lease

98

U.S. Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Area: U.S. Alaska Lower 48 States Alabama Arkansas California CA, San Joaquin Basin Onshore Colorado Kentucky Louisiana North Louisiana LA, South Onshore Michigan Montana New Mexico NM, East NM, West North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Texas TX, RRC District 1 TX, RRC District 2 Onshore TX, RRC District 3 Onshore TX, RRC District 4 Onshore TX, RRC District 5 TX, RRC District 6 TX, RRC District 7B TX, RRC District 7C TX, RRC District 8 TX, RRC District 9 TX, RRC District 10 TX, State Offshore West Virginia Wyoming Miscellaneous Period: Area: U.S. Alaska Lower 48 States Alabama Arkansas California CA, San Joaquin Basin Onshore Colorado Kentucky Louisiana North Louisiana LA, South Onshore Michigan Montana New Mexico NM, East NM, West North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Texas TX, RRC District 1 TX, RRC District 2 Onshore TX, RRC District 3 Onshore TX, RRC District 4 Onshore TX, RRC District 5 TX, RRC District 6 TX, RRC District 7B TX, RRC District 7C TX, RRC District 8 TX, RRC District 9 TX, RRC District 10 TX, State Offshore West Virginia Wyoming Miscellaneous Period: Annual Download Series History Download Series History Definitions, Sources & Notes Definitions, Sources & Notes Show Data By: Data Series Area

99

Simplified life cycle approach: GHG variability assessment for onshore wind electricity based on Monte-Carlo simulations  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Simplified life cycle approach: GHG variability assessment for onshore wind electricity based in the literature. In the special case of greenhouses gases (GHG) from wind power electricity, the LCA results performances with a simplified life cycle approach. Variability of GHG performances of onshore wind turbines

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

100

Natural gas accumulations in low-permeability Tertiary, and Cretaceous (Campanian and Maastrichtian) rock, Uinta Basin, Utah  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report characterizes Upper Cretaceous Campanian and Maastrichtian, and lower Tertiary gas-bearing rocks in the Uinta Basin with special emphasis on those units that contain gas in reservoirs that have been described as being tight. The report was prepared for the USDOE whose Western Tight Gas Sandstone Program cofunded much of this research in conjunction with the US Geological Survey's Evolution of Sedimentary Basins, and Onshore Oil and Gas Programs. (VC)

Fouch, T.D.; Wandrey, C.J.; Pitman, J.K.; Nuccio, V.F.; Schmoker, J.W.; Rice, D.D.; Johnson, R.C.; Dolton, G.L.

1992-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "joaquin basin onshore" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Natural gas accumulations in low-permeability Tertiary, and Cretaceous (Campanian and Maastrichtian) rock, Uinta Basin, Utah. Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report characterizes Upper Cretaceous Campanian and Maastrichtian, and lower Tertiary gas-bearing rocks in the Uinta Basin with special emphasis on those units that contain gas in reservoirs that have been described as being tight. The report was prepared for the USDOE whose Western Tight Gas Sandstone Program cofunded much of this research in conjunction with the US Geological Survey`s Evolution of Sedimentary Basins, and Onshore Oil and Gas Programs. (VC)

Fouch, T.D.; Wandrey, C.J.; Pitman, J.K.; Nuccio, V.F.; Schmoker, J.W.; Rice, D.D.; Johnson, R.C.; Dolton, G.L.

1992-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

102

Sticky Cotton Workshop APWDS AND WWTEFLIES IN THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY OF  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Sticky Cotton Workshop APWDS AND WWTEFLIES IN THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY OF CALIFORNIA IN 1995 Larry The conon aphid has developed into a key pest of cotton in California. The common pattern of seasonal dynamics of cotton aphid populations has changed repealedly over the last 15 years. The cotton aphid

Rosenheim, Jay A.

103

Nest-Site Habitat of Cavity-Nesting Birds at the San Joaquin Experimental Range1  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

279 Nest-Site Habitat of Cavity-Nesting Birds at the San Joaquin Experimental Range1 Kathryn L. Purcell2 and Jared Verner2 Abstract Detailed information about the nesting habitats of birds, including those needed for successful nesting, can provide a better understanding of the ecological factors

Standiford, Richard B.

104

Onshore wind max capacity 50.4% - what wind farm, what year? | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Onshore wind max capacity 50.4% - what wind farm, what year? Onshore wind max capacity 50.4% - what wind farm, what year? Home How can I find more specific information about wind capacity? I can get the max/min/media stuff from the bar graphs. Is there any way to see individual wind farm capacity per year or get examples of performance? I'm helping run a tech site and some specific information would be helpful in dealing with skeptical individuals. Is there any more detailed information on capacity other than the graph summary statistics? (I do not know my way around this site, but I'm willing to learn.) Submitted by Bob Wallace on 15 June, 2013 - 00:23 1 answer Points: 0 Hi Bob- Thank you for posting your question. It seems that your question developed after viewing/using the Transparent Cost Database, however, I

105

Texas - RRC District 3 Onshore Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels) Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels) Texas - RRC District 3 Onshore Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 231 1980's 216 230 265 285 270 260 237 241 208 213 1990's 181 208 211 253 254 272 289 286 246 226 2000's 209 226 241 207 221 226 234 271 196 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Natural Gas Liquids Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 TX, RRC District 3 Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Proved Reserves Natural Gas Liquids Proved Reserves as of Dec.

106

Texas - RRC District 4 Onshore Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels) Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels) Texas - RRC District 4 Onshore Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 248 1980's 252 260 289 292 295 269 281 277 260 260 1990's 279 273 272 278 290 287 323 347 363 422 2000's 406 378 370 287 326 309 333 327 310 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Natural Gas Liquids Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 TX, RRC District 4 Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Proved Reserves Natural Gas Liquids Proved Reserves as of Dec.

107

Texas - RRC District 2 Onshore Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2 Onshore Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) 2 Onshore Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Texas - RRC District 2 Onshore Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 2,079 1980's 1,645 1,920 1,785 1,890 1,965 1,895 1,760 1,861 1,703 1,419 1990's 1,418 1,127 1,176 1,137 1,169 1,126 1,178 1,497 1,516 1,772 2000's 1,930 1,798 1,797 1,768 1,858 2,066 2,048 2,249 2,292 1,837 2010's 2,101 2,766 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014

108

Louisiana - South Onshore Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

South Onshore Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) South Onshore Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Louisiana - South Onshore Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 2,304 1980's 2,134 1,871 1,789 1,582 1,488 1,792 1,573 1,380 1,338 1,273 1990's 1,106 995 853 649 678 720 627 599 630 599 2000's 492 483 427 368 389 427 415 503 471 506 2010's 499 490 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Wet After Lease

109

Texas - RRC District 4 Onshore Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

4 Onshore Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) 4 Onshore Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Texas - RRC District 4 Onshore Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 7,143 1980's 7,074 7,251 7,802 7,847 8,094 7,825 7,964 7,317 6,891 7,009 1990's 7,473 7,096 6,813 7,136 7,679 7,812 7,877 8,115 8,430 9,169 2000's 9,942 10,206 9,711 8,919 8,902 8,956 8,364 8,210 7,803 6,961 2010's 7,301 9,993 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014

110

Multimedia transport and risk assessment of organophosphate pesticides and a case study in the northern San Joaquin Valley of California  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Multimedia transport and risk assessment of organophosphate pesticides and a case study) pesticides in the northern San Joaquin Valley of California. Chemical concentrations in environmental media guidelines for cumulative risk analysis. Uncertainty in the human exposure parame- ters was included

Zhang, Minghua

111

Subsidence Reversal in a Re-established Wetland in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, USA  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

San Joaquin Delta, California, USA Robin L. Miller, U.S.estuary, California, USA. Journal of Coastal Research 20:accretion in a Mid-Atlantic (USA) tidal freshwater marsh.

Miller, Robin L.; Fram, Miranda; Fujii, Roger; Wheeler, Gail

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

112

EIS-0496: San Luis Transmission Project, Alameda, Merced, San Joaquin and  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

96: San Luis Transmission Project, Alameda, Merced, San 96: San Luis Transmission Project, Alameda, Merced, San Joaquin and Stanislaus Counties, California EIS-0496: San Luis Transmission Project, Alameda, Merced, San Joaquin and Stanislaus Counties, California Summary DOE's Western Area Power Administration, with the Bureau of Reclamation as a cooperating agency, is preparing a joint EIS and environmental impact report (under the California Environmental Quality Act) to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the proposed interconnection of certain San Luis Unit facilities to Western's Central Valley Project Transmission System. Western proposes at a minimum to construct, own, operate, and maintain a new 230-kilovolt (kV) transmission line about 62 miles in length between Western's Tracy Substation and Western's San Luis Substation and a

113

Texas - RRC District 2 Onshore Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves (Billion  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Texas - RRC District 2 Onshore Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 3,162 2,976 2,974 1980's 2,502 2,629 2,493 2,534 2,512 2,358 2,180 2,273 2,037 1,770 1990's 1,737 1,393 1,389 1,321 1,360 1,251 1,322 1,634 1,614 1,881 2000's 1,980 1,801 1,782 1,770 1,844 2,073 2,060 2,255 2,238 1,800 2010's 2,090 3,423 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 TX, RRC District 2 Onshore Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves

114

Texas - RRC District 4 Onshore Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves (Billion  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Texas - RRC District 4 Onshore Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 9,621 9,031 8,326 1980's 8,130 8,004 8,410 8,316 8,525 8,250 8,274 7,490 7,029 7,111 1990's 7,475 7,048 6,739 7,038 7,547 7,709 7,769 8,099 8,429 8,915 2000's 9,645 9,956 9,469 8,763 8,699 8,761 8,116 7,963 7,604 6,728 2010's 7,014 9,458 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 TX, RRC District 4 Onshore Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves

115

Model methodology and data description of the Production of Onshore Lower 48 Oil and Gas model  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents the methodology and data used in the Production of Onshore Lower 48 Oil and Gas (PROLOG) model. The model forecasts annual oil and natural gas production on a regional basis. Natural gas is modeled by gas category, generally conforming to categories defined by the Natural Gas Policy Act (NGPA) of 1978, as well as a category representing gas priced by way of a spot market (referred to as ''spot'' gas). A linear program is used to select developmental drilling activities for conventional oil and gas and exploratory drilling activities for deep gas on the basis of their economic merit, subject to constraints on available rotary rigs and constraints based on historical drilling patterns. Using exogenously specified price paths for oil and gas, net present values are computed for fixed amounts of drilling activity for oil and gas development and deep gas exploration in each of six onshore regions. Through maximizing total net present value, the linear program provides forecasts of drilling activities, reserve additions, and production. Oil and shallow gas exploratory drilling activities are forecast on the basis of econometrically derived equations, which are dependent on specified price paths for the two fuels. 10 refs., 3 figs., 10 tabs.

Not Available

1988-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

116

Concept Paper for Real-Time Temperature and Water QualityManagement for San Joaquin River Riparian Habitat Restoration  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The San Joaquin River Riparian Habitat Restoration Program (SJRRP) has recognized the potential importance of real-time monitoring and management to the success of the San Joaquin River (SJR) restoration endeavor. The first step to realizing making real-time management a reality on the middle San Joaquin River between Friant Dam and the Merced River will be the installation and operation of a network of permanent telemetered gauging stations that will allow optimization of reservoir releases made specifically for fish water temperature management. Given the limited reservoir storage volume available to the SJJRP, this functionality will allow the development of an adaptive management program, similar in concept to the VAMP though with different objectives. The virtue of this approach is that as management of the middle SJR becomes more routine, additional sensors can be added to the sensor network, initially deployed, to continue to improve conditions for anadromous fish.

Quinn, Nigel W.T.

2004-12-20T23:59:59.000Z

117

Production of Onshore Lower-48 Oil and Gas-model methodology and data description. [PROLOG  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents the methodology and data used in the Production of Onshore Lower-48 Oil and Gas (PROLOG) model. The model forecasts annual oil and natural gas production on a regional basis. A linear program is used to select drilling activities for conventional oil and gas on the basis of their economic merit, subject to constraints on available rotary rigs and constraints based on historical drilling patterns. Using an exogenously specified price path, net present values are computed for fixed amounts of drilling activity for oil and gas, and for exploration and development in each of six onshore regions. Forecasts of drilling for enhanced gas recovery (EGR) are exogenously determined, and this drilling is included when considering the constraints on drilling rigs. The report is organized as follows. Chapter 2 is a general overview of the model, describing the major characteristics of the methodology and the logical interaction of the various modules. Chapter 3 specifies the structure of the linear program including the equations for the objective function and the constraints. The details of the methodology used to model exploratory, developmental, and deep gas drilling are presented in Chapters 4-6, respectively. Chapter 7 presents a discussion of the economic evaluation which takes place in each discounted cash flow calculation performed by the model. Cost equations are presented, and various user-specified options as to how to incorporate these costs are discussed. Methodological details and equations used to model finding rates and revisions are given in Chapter 8. Possible areas of future enhancements to the PROLOG model are presented in Chapter 9.

Carlson, M.; Kurator, W.; Mariner-Volpe, B.; O'Neill, R.; Trapmann, W.

1982-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

118

Cross-entropy Analysis of the Information in Forensic Speaker Recognition Daniel Ramos and Joaquin Gonzalez-Rodriguez  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Cross-entropy Analysis of the Information in Forensic Speaker Recognition Daniel Ramos and Joaquin analyze the average information supplied by a forensic speaker recognition system in an information of information, ac- cording to the needs of transparency and testability in forensic science. This analysis

Autonoma de Madrid, Universidad

119

The Influence of Meteorology on the Air Quality in the San Luis Obispo County-Southwestern San Joaquin Valley Region for 3?6 August 1990  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The large volume of data measured during the 1990 summer San Joaquin Valley Air Quality Study/Atmospheric Utility Signatures, Predictions, and Experiments (SJVAQS/AUSPEX) provides a unique opportunity to examine the influence of meteorology on ...

Elizabeth M. Niccum; Donald E. Lehrman; William R. Knuth

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

120

Simplified 1-D Hydrodynamic and Salinity Transport Modeling of the SacramentoSan Joaquin Delta: Sea Level Rise and Water Diversion Effects  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

salinity simulations of sea level rise scenarios. AppendixSan Joaquin Delta: Sea Level Rise and Water Diversiona 1-D model of sea level rise in an estuary must account for

Fleenor, William E.; Bombardelli, Fabian

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "joaquin basin onshore" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

On the temperature dependence of organic reactivity, nitrogen oxides, ozone production, and the impact of emission controls in San Joaquin Valley, California  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The San Joaquin Valley (SJV) experiences some of the worst ozone air quality in the US, frequently exceeding the California 8 h standard of 70.4 ppb. To improve our understanding of trends in the number of ozone violations ...

Pusede, S. E.

122

Texas - RRC District 2 Onshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Texas - RRC District 2 Onshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 3,034 1980's 2,566 2,726 2,565 2,637 2,626 2,465 2,277 2,373 2,131 1,849 1990's 1,825 1,479 1,484 1,425 1,468 1,371 1,430 1,732 1,720 1,974 2000's 2,045 1,863 1,867 1,849 1,934 2,175 2,166 2,386 2,364 1,909 2010's 2,235 3,690 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Wet After Lease Separation, as of Dec.

123

Texas - RRC District 4 Onshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Texas - RRC District 4 Onshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 8,559 1980's 8,366 8,256 8,692 8,612 8,796 8,509 8,560 7,768 7,284 7,380 1990's 7,774 7,339 7,041 7,351 7,870 8,021 8,123 8,483 8,824 9,351 2000's 10,118 10,345 9,861 9,055 9,067 9,104 8,474 8,327 7,930 7,057 2010's 7,392 10,054 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Wet After Lease Separation, as of Dec.

124

Framework for Assessing Viability of Threatened and Endangered Chinook Salmon and Steelhead in the SacramentoSan Joaquin Basin  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ISAB 2005-2. Portland, OR. Bjornstad ON, Ims RA, Lambin X.covariance function (Bjornstad et al. 1999). Of particular

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

125

Improving an Accuracy of ANN-Based Mesoscale-Microscale Coupling Model by Data Categorization: With Application to Wind Forecast for Offshore and Complex Terrain Onshore Wind Farms  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The ANN-based mesoscale-microscale coupling model forecasts wind speed and wind direction with high accuracy for wind parks located in complex terrain onshore, yet some weather regimes remains unresolved and f...

Alla Sapronova; Catherine Meissner

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

126

NATURAL GAS RESOURCES IN DEEP SEDIMENTARY BASINS  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

From a geological perspective, deep natural gas resources are generally defined as resources occurring in reservoirs at or below 15,000 feet, whereas ultra-deep gas occurs below 25,000 feet. From an operational point of view, ''deep'' is often thought of in a relative sense based on the geologic and engineering knowledge of gas (and oil) resources in a particular area. Deep gas can be found in either conventionally-trapped or unconventional basin-center accumulations that are essentially large single fields having spatial dimensions often exceeding those of conventional fields. Exploration for deep conventional and unconventional basin-center natural gas resources deserves special attention because these resources are widespread and occur in diverse geologic environments. In 1995, the U.S. Geological Survey estimated that 939 TCF of technically recoverable natural gas remained to be discovered or was part of reserve appreciation from known fields in the onshore areas and State waters of the United. Of this USGS resource, nearly 114 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of technically-recoverable gas remains to be discovered from deep sedimentary basins. Worldwide estimates of deep gas are also high. The U.S. Geological Survey World Petroleum Assessment 2000 Project recently estimated a world mean undiscovered conventional gas resource outside the U.S. of 844 Tcf below 4.5 km (about 15,000 feet). Less is known about the origins of deep gas than about the origins of gas at shallower depths because fewer wells have been drilled into the deeper portions of many basins. Some of the many factors contributing to the origin of deep gas include the thermal stability of methane, the role of water and non-hydrocarbon gases in natural gas generation, porosity loss with increasing thermal maturity, the kinetics of deep gas generation, thermal cracking of oil to gas, and source rock potential based on thermal maturity and kerogen type. Recent experimental simulations using laboratory pyrolysis methods have provided much information on the origins of deep gas. Technologic problems are one of the greatest challenges to deep drilling. Problems associated with overcoming hostile drilling environments (e.g. high temperatures and pressures, and acid gases such as CO{sub 2} and H{sub 2}S) for successful well completion, present the greatest obstacles to drilling, evaluating, and developing deep gas fields. Even though the overall success ratio for deep wells is about 50 percent, a lack of geological and geophysical information such as reservoir quality, trap development, and gas composition continues to be a major barrier to deep gas exploration. Results of recent finding-cost studies by depth interval for the onshore U.S. indicate that, on average, deep wells cost nearly 10 times more to drill than shallow wells, but well costs and gas recoveries vary widely among different gas plays in different basins. Based on an analysis of natural gas assessments, many topical areas hold significant promise for future exploration and development. One such area involves re-evaluating and assessing hypothetical unconventional basin-center gas plays. Poorly-understood basin-center gas plays could contain significant deep undiscovered technically-recoverable gas resources.

Thaddeus S. Dyman; Troy Cook; Robert A. Crovelli; Allison A. Henry; Timothy C. Hester; Ronald C. Johnson; Michael D. Lewan; Vito F. Nuccio; James W. Schmoker; Dennis B. Riggin; Christopher J. Schenk

2002-02-05T23:59:59.000Z

127

Life cycle assessment of an onshore wind farm located at the northeastern coast of Brazil  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This article assesses the life cycle emissions of a fictive onshore wind power station consisting of 141.5-MW wind turbines situated on the northeastern coast of Brazil. The objective is to identify the main sources of CO2(eq)-emissions during the life cycle of the wind farm. The novelty of this work lies in the focus on Brazil and its emerging national manufacturing industry. With an electricity matrix that is primarily based on renewable energy sources (87% in 2010), this country emits eight times less CO2 for the production of 1kWh of electricity than the global average. Although this fact jeopardizes the CO2 mitigation potential of wind power projects, it also reduces the carbon footprint of parts and components manufactured in Brazil. The analysis showed that reduced CO2-emissions in the material production stage and the low emissions of the component production stage led to a favorable CO2-intensity of 7.1g CO2/kWh. The bulk of the emissions, a share of over 90%, were unambiguously caused by the production stage, and the transportation stage was responsible for another 6% of the CO2-emissions. The small contributions from the construction and operation phases could be neglected. Within the manufacturing process, the steel tower was identified as the source responsible for more than half of the emissions. The environmental impacts of the wind farm are small in terms of CO2-emissions, which can be credited to a green electricity mix. This scenario presents an advantage for the country and for further production sites, particularly in the surroundings of the preferred wind farm sites in Brazil, which should be favored to reduce CO2 emissions to an even greater extent.

Kerstin B. Oebels; Sergio Pacca

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

128

Effects of increasing filing fees for noncompetitive onshore oil and gas leases  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Government Accounting Office (GAO) examined the impact of increasing the fee charged to applicants for noncompetitive onshore oil and gas leases from $25.00 to $75.00. Interior believes the increased filing fee will: (1) reduce casual speculation and multiple filings, thereby reducing fraud potential, development delays caused by assignments, and administrative burden; and (2) generate significant additional revenue. Interior's analysis is, of necessity, based largely on conjecture, but the possibility that the positive results foreseen may not materialize to the degree projected cannot be ruled out. For example, while it is likely that the $75 fee will generate additional revenue over what was obtainable under either the $10 or $25 rate, Interior's projections of at least a million filings annually and $150 million in revenues are far from certain. GAO was also unable in the time available to determine the degree to which the problems the Department desires to overcome exist, or that they will be resolved through a fee increase. Results suggest that: reducing the number of filings is not necessarily the total or only solution to reducing the administrative burden; the casual speculator is not having that great an adverse effect on development, and in fact has certain positive aspects; and the true extent of fraud in the SOG may not be as great as initially supposed. In addition, there are possible adverse effects that may not have been fully considered. For example, the increased filing fee, when coupled with the increased rental, could adversely affect industry's exploration activities, particularly that of the smaller independent. GAO suggests, now that the increase is in effect, that the Interior Department and the Congress closely watch the results, and be prepared to take remedial action if deemed necessary.

Not Available

1982-03-19T23:59:59.000Z

129

Evidence for natural gas hydrate occurrences in Colombia Basin  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Multichannel and selected single-channel seismic lines of the continental margin sediments of the Colombia basin display compelling evidence for large accumulations of natural gas hydrate. Seismic bottom simulating reflectors (BSRs), interpreted to mark the base of the hydrate stability zone, are pronounced and very widespread along the entire Panama-Colombia lower continental slope. BSRs have also been identified at two locations on the abyssal plain. Water depths for these suspected hydrate occurrences range from 900 to 4000 m. Although no gas hydrate samples have been recovered from this area, biogenic methane is abundant in Pliocene turbidites underlying the abyssal plain. More deeply buried rocks beneath the abyssal plain are thermally mature. Thermogenic gas from these rocks may migrate upward along structural pathways into the hydrate stability zone and form hydrate. Impermeable hydrate layers may form caps over large accumulations of free gas, accounting for the very well-defined BSRs in the area. The abyssal plain and the deformed continental margin hold the highest potential for major economic accumulations of gas hydrate in the basin. The extensive continuity of BSRs, relatively shallow water depths, and promixity to onshore production facilities render the marginal deformed belt sediments the most favorable target for future economic development of the gas hydrate resource within the Colombia basin. The widespread evidence of gas hydrates in the Colombia basin suggests a high potential for conventional hydrocarbon deposits offshore of Panama and Colombia.

Finley, P.D.; Krason, J.; Dominic, K.

1987-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

130

Basin Destination State  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

3. Estimated rail transportation rates for coal, basin to state, EIA data 3. Estimated rail transportation rates for coal, basin to state, EIA data Basin Destination State 2008 2009 2010 2008-2010 2009-2010 Northern Appalachian Basin Delaware $28.49 - W W - Northern Appalachian Basin Florida - $38.51 $39.67 - 3.0 Northern Appalachian Basin Georgia - W - - - Northern Appalachian Basin Indiana $20.35 $16.14 $16.64 -9.6 3.1 Northern Appalachian Basin Kentucky - - W - - Northern Appalachian Basin Maryland $19.64 $19.60 $20.41 1.9 4.2 Northern Appalachian Basin Michigan $14.02 $16.13 $16.23 7.6 0.6 Northern Appalachian Basin New Hampshire $43.43 $40.18 $39.62 -4.5 -1.4

131

Basin Destination State  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

4. Estimated rail transportation rates for coal, basin to state, EIA data 4. Estimated rail transportation rates for coal, basin to state, EIA data Basin Destination State 2008 2009 2010 2008-2010 2009-2010 Northern Appalachian Basin Delaware $26.24 - W W - Northern Appalachian Basin Florida - $35.10 $35.74 - 1.8 Northern Appalachian Basin Georgia - W - - - Northern Appalachian Basin Indiana $18.74 $14.70 $14.99 -10.6 1.9 Northern Appalachian Basin Kentucky - - W - - Northern Appalachian Basin Maryland $18.09 $17.86 $18.39 0.8 3.0 Northern Appalachian Basin Michigan $12.91 $14.70 $14.63 6.4 -0.5 Northern Appalachian Basin New Hampshire $40.00 $36.62 $35.70 -5.5 -2.5

132

Bridging 3D seismic onshore: Lodgepole play highlights promise and challenges  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Recent major discoveries by Conoco Inc. and Duncan Oil in the Lower Mississippian Lodgepole formation of the Williston basin show that finding major oil reserves is still possible in the US and that 3D seismic methods have the capability to locate them. The implications are profound for independent oil and gas producers, who traditionally concentrate their operations in the mature US. Like major companies, independents are profiting form use of 3D seismic methods. The Williston basin successes show how independents might use 3D seismic methods to identify opportunities in a region once considered to be drilled up. Both the increasing use of these technologies by independents as well as the experiences major companies have had with them are well-documented. The paper discusses the Lodgepole discoveries, rejuvenation of the US oil and gas industry, stratigraphic information available by 3D seismic means, economic impact, and implications of 30 seismic work in the US.

O`Connor, R.B. Jr. [Wavetech Geophysical Inc., Denver, CO (United States)

1995-11-20T23:59:59.000Z

133

Basin Destination State  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

43 $0.0294 W - W W - - - 43 $0.0294 W - W W - - - Northern Appalachian Basin Florida $0.0161 W W W W $0.0216 W W W W W Northern Appalachian Basin Illinois W W - - - - - - - - - Northern Appalachian Basin Indiana W W W W W W W W W W W Northern Appalachian Basin Kentucky - - W W - - - - - - - Northern Appalachian Basin Maryland $0.0296 $0.0277 $0.0292 $0.0309 $0.0325 $0.0328 $0.0357 $0.0451 $0.0427 4.7 -5.3 Northern Appalachian Basin Massachusetts W W - - - - - - - - -

134

Basin Destination State  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

$15.49 $13.83 W - W W - - - $15.49 $13.83 W - W W - - - Northern Appalachian Basin Florida $19.46 W W W W $29.49 W W W W W Northern Appalachian Basin Illinois W W - - - - - - - - - Northern Appalachian Basin Indiana W W W W W W W W W W W Northern Appalachian Basin Kentucky - - W W - - - - - - - Northern Appalachian Basin Maryland $10.33 $9.58 $10.68 $12.03 $13.69 $14.71 $16.11 $19.72 $20.69 9.1 4.9 Northern Appalachian Basin Massachusetts W W - - - - - - - - -

135

Basin Destination State  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

$0.0323 $0.0284 W - W W - - - $0.0323 $0.0284 W - W W - - - Northern Appalachian Basin Florida $0.0146 W W W W $0.0223 W W W W W Northern Appalachian Basin Illinois W W - - - - - - - - - Northern Appalachian Basin Indiana W W W W W W W W W W W Northern Appalachian Basin Kentucky - - W W - - - - - - - Northern Appalachian Basin Maryland $0.0269 $0.0255 $0.0275 $0.0299 $0.0325 $0.0339 $0.0380 $0.0490 $0.0468 7.2 -4.3 Northern Appalachian Basin Massachusetts W W - - - - - - - - -

136

Basin Destination State  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Basin Basin Destination State 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2001-2009 2008-2009 Northern Appalachian Basin Delaware W W $16.45 $14.29 W - W W - - - Northern Appalachian Basin Florida $21.45 W W W W $28.57 W W W W W Northern Appalachian Basin Illinois W W - - - - - - - - - Northern Appalachian Basin Indiana W W W W W W W W W W W Northern Appalachian Basin Kentucky - - W W - - - - - - - Northern Appalachian Basin Maryland $11.39 $10.39 $11.34 $12.43 $13.69 $14.25 $15.17 $18.16 $18.85 6.5 3.8

137

Water Basins Civil Engineering  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Water Basins Civil Engineering Objective · Connect the study of water, water cycle, and ecosystems with engineering · Discuss how human impacts can effect our water basins, and how engineers lessen these impacts: · The basic concepts of water basins are why they are important · To use a topographic map · To delineate

Provancher, William

138

Texas-Louisiana- Mississippi Salt Basin Greater Green River Basin  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Texas-Louisiana- Texas-Louisiana- Mississippi Salt Basin Greater Green River Basin W. Gulf Coast Basin Appalachian Basin Wind River Basin Eastern Shelf NW Shelf Abo Sussex-Shannon Muddy J Mesaverde- Lance-Lewis Medina/Clinton-Tuscarora Bradford-Venango-Elk Berea-Murrysville Piceance Basin Bossier Williston Basin Ft Worth Basin Davis Bighorn Basin Judith River- Eagle Permian Basin Anadarko Basin Denver Basin San Juan Basin North-Central Montana Area Uinta Basin Austin Chalk Codell-Niobrara Penn-Perm Carbonate Niobrara Chalk Dakota Morrow Mesaverde Thirty- One Cleveland Ozona Canyon Wasatch- Mesaverde Red Fork Mesaverde Granite Wash Stuart City-Edwards Bowdoin- Greenhorn Travis Peak Olmos Cotton Valley Vicksburg Wilcox Lobo Pictured Cliffs Cretaceous Cretaceous-Lower Tertiary Mancos- Dakota Gilmer Lime Major Tight Gas Plays, Lower 48 States

139

Recoverable Resource Estimate of Identified Onshore Geopressured Geothermal Energy in Texas and Louisiana (Presentation), NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Recoverable Resource Estimate of Identified Recoverable Resource Estimate of Identified Onshore Geopressured Geothermal Energy in Texas and Louisiana AAPG 2012 Annual Convention and Exhibition Ariel Esposito and Chad Augustine April 24, 2012 NREL/PR-6A20-54999 2 * Geopressured Geothermal o Reservoirs characterized by pore fluids under high confining pressures and high temperatures with correspondingly large quantities of dissolved methane o Soft geopressure: Hydrostatic to 15.83 kPa/m o Hard geopressure: 15.83- 22.61 kPa/m (lithostatic pressure gradient) * Common Geopressured Geothermal Reservoir Structure o Upper thick low permeability shale o Thin sandstone layer o Lower thick low permeability shale * Three Potential Sources of Energy o Thermal energy (Temperature > 100°C - geothermal electricity generation)

140

Report of the Preliminary Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory Site 300, San Joaquin County, California  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The area subject to this investigation is the existing Lawrence Livermore Laboratory Site 300, located in the region north of Corral Hollow; approximately eight and one half miles southwest of Tracy, San Joaquin County, California. Cartographic location can be determined from the Tracy and Midway USGS 7.5 minute topographic quadrangles, the appropriate portions of which are herein reproduced as Maps 1 and 2. The majority of the approximate 7000 acres of the location lies within San Joaquin County. This includes all of the area arbitrarily designated the 'Eastern Portion' on Map 2 and the majority of the area designated the 'Western Portion' on Map 1. The remaining acreage, along the western boundary of the location, lies within Alameda County. The area is located in the region of open rolling hills immediately north of Corral Hollow, and ranges in elevation from approximately 600 feet, on the flood plain of Corral Hollow Creek, to approximately 1700 feet in the northwest portion of the project location. Proposed for the area under investigation are various, unspecified improvements or modifications to the existing Site 300 facilities. Present facilities consist of scattered buildings, bunkers and magazines, utilized for testing and research purposes, including the necessary water, power, and transportation improvements to support them. The vast majority of the 7000 acres location is presently open space, utilized as buffer zones between test locations and as firing ranges.

Busby, C

2009-11-24T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "joaquin basin onshore" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Divergent/passive margin basins  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This book discusses the detailed geology of the four divergent margin basins and establishes a set of analog scenarios which can be used for future petroleum exploration. The divergent margin basins are the Campos basin of Brazil, the Gabon basin, the Niger delta, and the basins of the northwest shelf of Australia. These four petroleum basins present a wide range of stratigraphic sequences and structural styles that represent the diverse evolution of this large and important class of world petroleum basins.

Edwards, J.D. (Shell Oil Company (US)); Santogrossi, P.A. (Shell Offshore Inc. (US))

1989-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

142

River Basin Commissions (Indiana)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This legislation establishes river basin commissions, for the Kankakee, Maumee, St. Joseph, and Upper Wabash Rivers. The commissions facilitate and foster cooperative planning and coordinated...

143

Origin of cratonic basins  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Tectonic subsidence curves show that the Illinois, Michigan, and Williston basins formed by initial fault-controlled mechanical subsidence during rifting and by subsequent thermal subsidence. Thermal subsidence began around 525 Ma in the Illinois Basin, 520-460 Ma in the Michigan Basin, and 530-500 Ma in the Williston Basin. In the Illinois Basin, a second subsidence episode (middle Mississippian through Early Permian) was caused by flexural foreland subsidence in response to the Alleghanian-Hercynian orogeny. Past workers have suggested mantle phase changes at the base of the crust, mechanical subsidence in response to isostatically uncompensated excess mass following igneous intrusions, intrusion of mantle plumes into the crust, or regional thermal metamorphic events as causes of basin initiation. Cratonic basins of North America, Europe, Africa, and South America share common ages of formation, histories of sediment accumulation, temporal volume changes of sediment fills, and common dates of interregional unconformities. Their common date of formation suggests initiation of cratonic basins in response to breakup of a late Precambrian supercontinent. This supercontinent acted as a heat lens that caused partial melting of the lower crust and upper mantle followed by emplacement of anorogenic granites during extensional tectonics in response to supercontinent breakup. Intrusion of anorogenic granites and other partially melted intrusive rocks weakened continental lithosphere, thus providing a zone of localized regional stretching and permitting formation of cratonic basins almost simultaneously over sites of intrusion of these anorogenic granites and other partially melted intrusive rocks.

de V. Klein, G.; Hsui, A.T.

1987-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

144

PEAT ACCRETION HISTORIES DURING THE PAST 6000 YEARS IN MARSHES OF THE SACRAMENTO - SAN JOAQUIN DELTA, CALIFORNIA, USA  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Peat cores were collected in 4 remnant marsh islands and 4 drained, farmed islands throughout the Sacramento - San Joaquin Delta of California in order to characterize the peat accretion history of this region. Radiocarbon age determination of marsh macrofossils at both marsh and farmed islands showed that marshes in the central and western Delta started forming between 6030 and 6790 cal yr BP. Age-depth models for three marshes were constructed using cubic smooth spline regression models. The resulting spline fit models were used to estimate peat accretion histories for the marshes. Estimated accretion rates range from 0.03 to 0.49 cm yr{sup -1} for the marsh sites. The highest accretion rates are at Browns Island, a marsh at the confluence of the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers. Porosity was examined in the peat core from Franks Wetland, one of the remnant marsh sites. Porosity was greater than 90% and changed little with depth indicating that autocompaction was not an important process in the peat column. The mean contribution of organic matter to soil volume at the marsh sites ranges from 6.15 to 9.25% with little variability. In contrast, the mean contribution of inorganic matter to soil volume ranges from 1.40 to 8.45% with much greater variability, especially in sites situated in main channels. These results suggest that marshes in the Delta can be viewed as largely autochthonous vs. allochthonous in character. Autochthonous sites are largely removed from watershed processes, such as sediment deposition and scour, and are dominated by organic production. Allochthonous sites have greater fluctuations in accretion rates due to the variability of inorganic inputs from the watershed. A comparison of estimated vertical accretion rates with 20th century rates of global sea-level rise shows that currently marshes are maintaining their positions in the tidal frame, yet this offers little assurance of sustainability under scenarios of increased sea-level rise in the future.

Drexler, J Z; de Fontaine, C S; Brown, T A

2009-07-20T23:59:59.000Z

145

K-Basins.pub  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 AUDIT REPORT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE OF AUDIT SERVICES COMPLETION OF K BASINS MILESTONES APRIL 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman (Signed) Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Completion of K Basins Milestones" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy (Department) has been storing 2,100 metric tons of spent nuclear fuel at the Hanford Site in southeastern Washington. The fuel, used in support of Hanford's former mission, is currently stored in canisters that are kept in two enclosed water-filled pools known as the K Basins. The K Basins represent a significant risk to the environment due to their deteriorating condition. In fact, the K East Basin, which is near the Columbia River, has

146

Potential on-shore and off-shore reservoirs for CO2 sequestration in Central Atlantic magmatic province basalts  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...measurements, and the borehole conditions were consistent...fracture porosity or large void space (secondary...features (34, 35). Drilling in the Nantucket...continental scientific drilling workshop, Arlington...guide to Earths largest continental flood...Culpeper basin, VA ( Drilling, Observation, and Sampling...

David S. Goldberg; Dennis V. Kent; Paul E. Olsen

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

147

Hydrocarbon traps within a seismic sequence framework, Stevens turbidites, southern San Joaquin Valley, CA  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Interpretation of the seismic sequence framework and log and lithologic character of upper Miocene Stevens turbidites on the Bakersfield arch has led to an improved understanding of the expression of stratigraphic trapping that should reduce exploration risk in the basin, and may aid exploration efforts in similar sand-rich systems globally. These deepwater sandstones are contained within three lowstand turbidite systems (LTS) that were deposited in a narrow deepwater basin adjacent to the ancestral Sierra Nevada. the oldest LTS, the Coulter, was transported through several submarine canyons incised into the Fruitvale Shale. In contrast, numerous smaller scale erosional features located on the high-relief slopes of the highstand Santa Margarita deltas, fed the overlying Gosford and Bellevue LTS. The systems consist of sandy, high-density (primarily) and low-density turbidites that were deposited within channel-lobe complexes. On the arch, 472 MMBO and 1.3 tcf have been produced from four seismically detectable traps with strong stratigraphic components: (1) sandstone permeability changes within turbidite wedges that thin rapidly onto structure (2) confined (channelized) turbidites that lap out on a structure (e.g., F-1 sand, South Coles levee), (3) channelized turbidites that pinch out within slope gullies, and (4) depositional compaction anticlines occurring in conjunction with low-gradient regional structure. Condensed section sediments form regional and reservoir-scale seals. Rapid lateral facies changes and grain size variations provide additional seal facies.

Hewlett, J.S.; Jordan, D.W. (ARCO Oil and Gas Co., Plano, TX (United States)); Crebs, T.J.; Moorefield, T.P. (ARCO Oil and Gas Co., Bakersfield, CA (United States))

1991-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

148

BASIN VER DE GREAT ER ANETH BU G BAR KER DOME HOR SESH OE UTE DOME  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Gas Reserve Class Gas Reserve Class 0 20 40 10 30 Miles ± The mapped oil and gas field boundary outlines were created by the Reserves and Production Division, Office of Oil and Gas, Energy Information Administration pursuant to studies required by Section 604 of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act Amendments of 2000 (P.L. 106-469). The boundaries are not informed by subsurface structural information. The data and methods used in their creation are detailed in a report, "Scientific Inventory of Onshore Federal Lands' Oil and Gas Resources and Reserves and the Extent and Nature of Restrictions to Their Development", prepared by the US Departments of Interior, Agriculture and Energy. Unnamed fields and fields generically named "wildcat" were renamed to a concatenate of their basin and state of occurrence,

149

BASIN VER DE GREAT ER ANETH BU G BAR KER DOME HOR SESH OE UTE DOME  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Liquids Reserve Class Liquids Reserve Class 0 20 40 10 30 Miles ± The mapped oil and gas field boundary outlines were created by the Reserves and Production Division, Office of Oil and Gas, Energy Information Administration pursuant to studies required by Section 604 of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act Amendments of 2000 (P.L. 106-469). The boundaries are not informed by subsurface structural information. The data and methods used in their creation are detailed in a report, "Scientific Inventory of Onshore Federal Lands' Oil and Gas Resources and Reserves and the Extent and Nature of Restrictions to Their Development", prepared by the US Departments of Interior, Agriculture and Energy. Unnamed fields and fields generically named "wildcat" were renamed to a concatenate of their basin and state of occurrence,

150

BASIN VER DE GREAT ER ANETH BU G BAR KER DOME HOR SESH OE UTE DOME  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

BOE Reserve Class BOE Reserve Class 0 20 40 10 30 Miles ± The mapped oil and gas field boundary outlines were created by the Reserves and Production Division, Office of Oil and Gas, Energy Information Administration pursuant to studies required by Section 604 of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act Amendments of 2000 (P.L. 106-469). The boundaries are not informed by subsurface structural information. The data and methods used in their creation are detailed in a report, "Scientific Inventory of Onshore Federal Lands' Oil and Gas Resources and Reserves and the Extent and Nature of Restrictions to Their Development", prepared by the US Departments of Interior, Agriculture and Energy. Unnamed fields and fields generically named "wildcat" were renamed to a concatenate of their basin and state of occurrence,

151

Nearshore Areas Used by Fry Chinook Salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, in the Northwestern SacramentoSan Joaquin Delta, California  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

framework for the future: Yolo Bypass management strategy: (J&S 99079). Prepared for Yolo Basin Foundation, Davis, CA.L. 2001b. Californias Yolo Bypass: evidence that flood

McLain, Jeff; Castillo, Gonzalo

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

152

Data Basin | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Data Basin Data Basin Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name: Data Basin Agency/Company /Organization: Conservation Biology Institute Topics: GHG inventory Resource Type: Dataset, Maps Website: databasin.org/ Data Basin Screenshot References: Data Basin [1] Overview "Data Basin is an innovative, online system that connects users with spatial datasets, tools, and expertise. Individuals and organization can explore and download a vast library of datasets, upload their own data, create and publish projects, form working groups, and produce customized maps that can be easily shared. The building blocks of Data Basin are: Datasets: A dataset is a spatially explicit file, currently Arcshape and ArcGrid files. These can be biological, physical, socioeconomic, (and

153

EA-64 Basin Electric Power Cooperative | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Basin Electric Power Cooperative EA-64 Basin Electric Power Cooperative Order authorizing Basin Electric Power Cooperative to export electric energy to Canada EA-64 Basin Electric...

154

ADVANCED CHEMISTRY BASINS MODEL  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The advanced Chemistry Basin Model project has been operative for 48 months. During this period, about half the project tasks are on projected schedule. On average the project is somewhat behind schedule (90%). Unanticipated issues are causing model integration to take longer then scheduled, delaying final debugging and manual development. It is anticipated that a short extension will be required to fulfill all contract obligations.

William Goddard III; Lawrence Cathles III; Mario Blanco; Paul Manhardt; Peter Meulbroek; Yongchun Tang

2004-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

155

Petroleum basin studies  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This book reviews the tectonic setting, basin development and history of exploration of a number of selected petroleum provinces located in a variety of settings in the Middle East, North Sea, Nigeria, the Rocky Mountains, Gabon and China. This book illustrates how ideas and models developed in one area may be applied to other regions. Regional reviews and the reassessment of petroleum provinces are presented.

Shannon, P.M. (Univ. College, Dublin (IE)); Naylor, D. (Westland Exploration Ltd., Dublin (IE))

1989-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

156

Caribbean basin framework, 3: Southern Central America and Colombian basin  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The authors recognize three basin-forming periods in southern Central America (Panama, Costa Rica, southern Nicaragua) that they attempt to correlate with events in the Colombian basin (Bowland, 1984): (1) Early-Late Cretaceous island arc formation and growth of the Central American island arc and Late Cretaceous formation of the Colombian basin oceanic plateau. During latest Cretaceous time, pelagic carbonate sediments blanketed the Central American island arc in Panama and Costa Rica and elevated blocks on the Colombian basin oceanic plateau; (2) middle Eocene-middle Miocene island arc uplift and erosion. During this interval, influx of distal terrigenous turbidites in most areas of Panama, Costa Rica, and the Colombian basin marks the uplift and erosion of the Central American island arc. In the Colombian basin, turbidites fill in basement relief and accumulate to thicknesses up to 2 km in the deepest part of the basin. In Costa Rica, sedimentation was concentrated in fore-arc (Terraba) and back-arc (El Limon) basins; (3) late Miocene-Recent accelerated uplift and erosion of segments of the Central American arc. Influx of proximal terrigenous turbidites and alluvial fans in most areas of Panama, Costa Rica, and the Colombian basin marks collision of the Panama arc with the South American continent (late Miocene early Pliocene) and collision of the Cocos Ridge with the Costa Rican arc (late Pleistocene). The Cocos Ridge collision inverted the Terraba and El Limon basins. The Panama arc collision produced northeast-striking left-lateral strike-slip faults and fault-related basins throughout Panama as Panama moved northwest over the Colombian basin.

Kolarsky, R.A.; Mann, P. (Univ. of Texas, Austin (United States))

1991-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

157

Advanced Chemistry Basins Model  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The DOE-funded Advanced Chemistry Basin model project is intended to develop a public domain, user-friendly basin modeling software under PC or low end workstation environment that predicts hydrocarbon generation, expulsion, migration and chemistry. The main features of the software are that it will: (1) afford users the most flexible way to choose or enter kinetic parameters for different maturity indicators; (2) afford users the most flexible way to choose or enter compositional kinetic parameters to predict hydrocarbon composition (e.g., gas/oil ratio (GOR), wax content, API gravity, etc.) at different kerogen maturities; (3) calculate the chemistry, fluxes and physical properties of all hydrocarbon phases (gas, liquid and solid) along the primary and secondary migration pathways of the basin and predict the location and intensity of phase fractionation, mixing, gas washing, etc.; and (4) predict the location and intensity of de-asphaltene processes. The project has be operative for 36 months, and is on schedule for a successful completion at the end of FY 2003.

William Goddard; Mario Blanco; Lawrence Cathles; Paul Manhardt; Peter Meulbroek; Yongchun Tang

2002-11-10T23:59:59.000Z

158

Ertek, G., Tun, M.M., Kurtaraner, E., Kebude, D., 2012, 'Insights into the Efficiencies of On-Shore Wind Turbines: A Data-Centric Analysis', INISTA 2012 Conference. July 2-4, 2012, Trabzon,  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

-Shore Wind Turbines: A Data-Centric Analysis', INISTA 2012 Conference. July 2-4, 2012, Trabzon, Turkey://research.sabanciuniv.edu. Insights into the Efficiencies of On-Shore Wind Turbines: A Data-Centric Analysis Gürdal Ertek, Murat University Istanbul, Turkey Abstract--Literature on renewable energy alternative of wind turbines does

Yanikoglu, Berrin

159

Late Cretaceous-Cenozoic Basin framework and petroleum potential of Panama and Costa Rica  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Despite its location between major petroleum provinces in northwestern South America and northern Central America, there is a widespread negative perception of the petroleum potential of Panama and Costa Rica in southern Central America. Several factors may contribute to this perception: (1) the on and offshore geology of many areas has only be studied in a reconnaissance fashion; (2) sandstone reservoirs and source rocks are likely to be of poor quality because Upper Cretaceous-Cenozoic sandstones are eroded from island arc or oceanic basement rocks and because oil-prone source rocks are likely to be scarce in near-arc basins; and (3) structural traps are likely to be small and fragmented because of complex late Cenozoic thrust and strike-slip tectonics. On the other hand, onshore oil and gas seeps, shows and small production in wildcat wells, and source rocks with TOC values up to 26% suggest the possibility of future discoveries. In this talk, we present the results of a regional study using 3100 km of offshore seismic lines kindly provided by industry. Age and stratigraphic control of offshore lines is constrained by limited well data and detailed field studies of basin outcrops in coastal areas. We describe the major structures, stratigraphy, and tectonic history of the following areas: Gulf of Panama and Gulf of Chiriqui of Panama and the Pacific and Caribbean margins of Costa Rica.

Mann, P. (Univ. of Texas, Austin (United States)); Kolarsky, R. (Texaco USA, New Orleans, LA (United States))

1993-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

160

Susquehanna River Basin Compact (Maryland)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This legislation enables the state's entrance into the Susquehanna River Basin Compact, which provides for the conservation, development, and administration of the water resources of the...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "joaquin basin onshore" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Table 19. Reported proved nonproducing reserves of crude oil, lease condensate, nonassociated gas, associated dissolved gas, and total gas (wet after lease separation), 2011  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

: Reported proved nonproducing reserves of crude oil, lease condensate, : Reported proved nonproducing reserves of crude oil, lease condensate, nonassociated gas, associated dissolved gas, and total gas (wet after lease separation), 2011 a Lease Nonassociated Associated Total Crude Oil Condensate Gas Dissolved Gas Gas State and Subdivision (Million bbls) (Million bbls) (Bcf) (Bcf) (Bcf) Alaska 566 0 288 63 351 Lower 48 States 8,483 880 104,676 13,197 117,873 Alabama 1 0 101 1 102 Arkansas 0 0 5,919 0 5,919 California 542 2 267 128 395 Coastal Region Onshore 248 0 0 20 20 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 69 0 0 23 23 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 163 0 265 54 319 State Offshore 62 2 2 31 33 Colorado 208 30 5,316 1,478 6,794 Florida 4 0 4 0 4 Kansas 4 0 244 39 283 Kentucky 0 0 75 0 75 Louisiana 152 29 14,905 257 15,162 North 30 10 13,820 12 13,832 South Onshore 113 17 1,028 232 1,260 State Offshore 9 2 57 13 70 Michigan 0

162

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

,305 1,766 3,107 2009-2011 ,305 1,766 3,107 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 159 77 29 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 158 61 29 2009-2011 Texas 1 16 0 2009-2011 Alaska 25 30 40 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 1,280 1,736 3,067 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 6 0 2009-2011 California 30 24 37 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 1 1 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 1 1 6 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 22 13 18 2009-2011 State Offshore 7 9 12 2009-2011 Colorado 37 80 96 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Illinois 3 2 0 2009-2011 Indiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 2 5 23 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 26 28 21 2009-2011 North 1 2 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 24 25 17 2009-2011 State Offshore

163

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

,305 1,766 3,107 2009-2011 ,305 1,766 3,107 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 159 77 29 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 158 61 29 2009-2011 Texas 1 16 0 2009-2011 Alaska 25 30 40 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 1,280 1,736 3,067 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 6 0 2009-2011 California 30 24 37 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 1 1 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 1 1 6 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 22 13 18 2009-2011 State Offshore 7 9 12 2009-2011 Colorado 37 80 96 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Illinois 3 2 0 2009-2011 Indiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 2 5 23 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 26 28 21 2009-2011 North 1 2 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 24 25 17 2009-2011 State Offshore

164

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

3,270 3,900 5,096 2009-2011 3,270 3,900 5,096 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 710 879 1,966 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 33 38 25 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 616 790 1,861 2009-2011 Texas 61 51 80 2009-2011 Alaska 394 397 362 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 2,876 3,503 4,734 2009-2011 Alabama 9 9 2 2009-2011 Arkansas 5 12 31 2009-2011 California 427 276 394 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 105 40 118 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 98 22 23 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 192 204 229 2009-2011 State Offshore 32 10 24 2009-2011 Colorado 28 52 71 2009-2011 Florida 8 10 9 2009-2011 Illinois 12 0 6 2009-2011 Indiana 1 0 1 2009-2011 Kansas 49 52 47 2009-2011 Kentucky 4 1 9 2009-2011 Louisiana 100 139 100 2009-2011 North 15 69 16 2009-2011 South Onshore

165

Coalbed Methane Reserves Acquisitions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

24 226 1,710 2009-2011 24 226 1,710 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 0 0 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Texas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 24 226 1,710 2009-2011 Alabama 0 151 219 2009-2011 Arkansas 22 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 0 0 1,021 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 0 0 2009-2011 Mississippi 0 0 0 2009-2011 Montana

166

Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Decreases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

2,486 2,914 1,668 2009-2011 2,486 2,914 1,668 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 0 0 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Texas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 2,486 2,914 1,668 2009-2011 Alabama 316 51 86 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 1 3 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 566 1,557 367 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 107 0 14 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 0 0 2009-2011 Mississippi 0 0 0 2009-2011

167

Coalbed Methane Reserves Adjustments  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

-14 784 -15 2009-2011 -14 784 -15 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 0 0 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Texas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States -14 784 -15 2009-2011 Alabama 0 61 -45 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 1 0 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 0 106 73 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas -3 -22 -6 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 0 0 2009-2011 Mississippi 0 0 0 2009-2011 Montana

168

Coalbed Methane Reserves Sales  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

08 366 1,775 2009-2011 08 366 1,775 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 0 0 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Texas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 208 366 1,775 2009-2011 Alabama 2 266 104 2009-2011 Arkansas 31 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 0 0 1,034 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 8 0 0 2009-2011 North 8 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 0 0 2009-2011 Mississippi 0 0 0 2009-2011 Montana

169

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Reserves Acquisitions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

344 1,470 1,561 2009-2011 344 1,470 1,561 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 16 108 56 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 14 102 52 2009-2011 Texas 2 6 4 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 79 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 344 1,470 1,482 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 20 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 0 3 2009-2011 California 20 156 40 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 2 154 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 1 9 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 18 1 16 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 15 2009-2011 Colorado 2 38 4 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Illinois 0 9 0 2009-2011 Indiana 0 2 0 2009-2011 Kansas 2 8 19 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 6 4 2009-2011 Louisiana 11 52 53 2009-2011 North 1 12 31 2009-2011 South Onshore 7 26 17 2009-2011 State Offshore 3 14 5 2009-2011

170

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Reserves Sales  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

249 803 1,024 2009-2011 249 803 1,024 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 20 56 42 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 20 54 42 2009-2011 Texas 0 2 0 2009-2011 Alaska 7 0 17 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 242 803 1,007 2009-2011 Alabama 0 3 11 2009-2011 Arkansas 3 3 28 2009-2011 California 3 1 7 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 1 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 2 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 3 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 5 2009-2011 Colorado 17 3 19 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Illinois 0 15 0 2009-2011 Indiana 0 2 0 2009-2011 Kansas 2 6 6 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 5 2009-2011 Louisiana 9 23 63 2009-2011 North 2 5 28 2009-2011 South Onshore 7 7 34 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 11 1 2009-2011

171

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Estimated Production, Wet After Lease  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1,929 1,991 2,065 2009-2011 1,929 1,991 2,065 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 599 590 504 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 22 19 22 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 522 518 432 2009-2011 Texas 55 53 50 2009-2011 Alaska 210 195 206 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 1,719 1,796 1,859 2009-2011 Alabama 7 7 8 2009-2011 Arkansas 6 5 6 2009-2011 California 208 198 196 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 18 18 20 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 15 15 15 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 161 152 149 2009-2011 State Offshore 14 13 12 2009-2011 Colorado 30 33 41 2009-2011 Florida 1 2 2 2009-2011 Illinois 5 4 4 2009-2011 Indiana 1 1 1 2009-2011 Kansas 40 41 41 2009-2011 Kentucky 2 1 1 2009-2011 Louisiana 68 66 68 2009-2011 North 11 10 11 2009-2011 South Onshore 48 47 47 2009-2011

172

Coalbed Methane New Field Discoveries  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

0 0 0 2009-2011 0 0 0 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 0 0 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Texas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 0 0 0 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 0 0 0 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 0 0 2009-2011 Mississippi 0 0 0 2009-2011 Montana 0 0 0 2009-2011 New Mexico

173

Coalbed Methane New Field Discoveries  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

0 0 0 2009-2011 0 0 0 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 0 0 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Texas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 0 0 0 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 0 0 0 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 0 0 2009-2011 Mississippi 0 0 0 2009-2011 Montana 0 0 0 2009-2011 New Mexico

174

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

46 188 207 2009-2011 46 188 207 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 -6 -1 2009-2011 Pacific (California) -1 -2 1 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 2 -3 -2 2009-2011 Texas -1 -1 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 1 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 46 188 206 2009-2011 Alabama 1 12 2 2009-2011 Arkansas 2 3 -2 2009-2011 California -17 14 32 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 1 0 -3 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 10 15 19 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore -30 1 16 2009-2011 State Offshore 2 -2 0 2009-2011 Colorado -9 25 -1 2009-2011 Florida -1 2 -2 2009-2011 Illinois 3 10 -10 2009-2011 Indiana -7 1 0 2009-2011 Kansas 20 61 22 2009-2011 Kentucky 4 -11 1 2009-2011 Louisiana -1 7 -8 2009-2011 North -4 -7 1 2009-2011 South Onshore 4 13 -6 2009-2011 State Offshore

175

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Reserves Acquisitions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

344 1,470 1,561 2009-2011 344 1,470 1,561 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 16 108 56 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 14 102 52 2009-2011 Texas 2 6 4 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 79 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 344 1,470 1,482 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 20 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 0 3 2009-2011 California 20 156 40 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 2 154 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 1 9 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 18 1 16 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 15 2009-2011 Colorado 2 38 4 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Illinois 0 9 0 2009-2011 Indiana 0 2 0 2009-2011 Kansas 2 8 19 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 6 4 2009-2011 Louisiana 11 52 53 2009-2011 North 1 12 31 2009-2011 South Onshore 7 26 17 2009-2011 State Offshore 3 14 5 2009-2011

176

Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Increases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1,563 2,589 2,071 2009-2011 1,563 2,589 2,071 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 0 0 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Texas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 1,563 2,589 2,071 2009-2011 Alabama 17 134 23 2009-2011 Arkansas 3 9 0 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 126 937 698 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 8 157 24 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 0 0 2009-2011 Mississippi 0 0 0 2009-2011

177

Coalbed Methane Reserves Extensions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

724 497 736 2009-2011 724 497 736 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 0 0 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Texas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 724 497 736 2009-2011 Alabama 21 29 3 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 48 184 220 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 7 1 3 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 0 0 2009-2011 Mississippi 0 0 0 2009-2011 Montana 3 3 0 2009-2011

178

Coalbed Methane Reserves Acquisitions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

24 226 1,710 2009-2011 24 226 1,710 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 0 0 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Texas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 24 226 1,710 2009-2011 Alabama 0 151 219 2009-2011 Arkansas 22 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 0 0 1,021 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 0 0 2009-2011 Mississippi 0 0 0 2009-2011 Montana

179

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet After Lease  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1,262 1,957 3,682 2009-2011 1,262 1,957 3,682 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 208 214 1,455 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 17 4 15 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 174 183 1,354 2009-2011 Texas 17 27 86 2009-2011 Alaska 152 76 129 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 1,110 1,881 3,553 2009-2011 Alabama 2 5 1 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 California 119 167 230 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 4 39 10 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 47 2 2 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 68 125 217 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 1 1 2009-2011 Colorado 27 34 56 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 2 2009-2011 Illinois 1 4 2 2009-2011 Indiana 0 0 1 2009-2011 Kansas 21 47 23 2009-2011 Kentucky 3 3 2 2009-2011 Louisiana 69 93 43 2009-2011 North 6 11 4 2009-2011 South Onshore 57 73 34 2009-2011

180

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate New Field Discoveries  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

141 124 481 2009-2011 141 124 481 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 96 10 410 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 34 10 410 2009-2011 Texas 62 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 9 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 132 124 481 2009-2011 Alabama 0 1 1 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 0 0 0 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Illinois 0 0 0 2009-2011 Indiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 2 2 2 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 0 0 1 2009-2011 North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 1 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 10 0 8 2009-2011

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "joaquin basin onshore" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate New Field Discoveries  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

141 124 481 2009-2011 141 124 481 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 96 10 410 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 34 10 410 2009-2011 Texas 62 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 9 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 132 124 481 2009-2011 Alabama 0 1 1 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 0 0 0 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Illinois 0 0 0 2009-2011 Indiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 2 2 2 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 0 0 1 2009-2011 North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 1 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 10 0 8 2009-2011

182

Advanced Chemistry Basins Model  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The objective of this project is to: (1) Develop a database of additional and better maturity indicators for paleo-heat flow calibration; (2) Develop maturation models capable of predicting the chemical composition of hydrocarbons produced by a specific kerogen as a function of maturity, heating rate, etc.; assemble a compositional kinetic database of representative kerogens; (3) Develop a 4 phase equation of state-flash model that can define the physical properties (viscosity, density, etc.) of the products of kerogen maturation, and phase transitions that occur along secondary migration pathways; (4) Build a conventional basin model and incorporate new maturity indicators and data bases in a user-friendly way; (5) Develop an algorithm which combines the volume change and viscosities of the compositional maturation model to predict the chemistry of the hydrocarbons that will be expelled from the kerogen to the secondary migration pathways; (6) Develop an algorithm that predicts the flow of hydrocarbons along secondary migration pathways, accounts for mixing of miscible hydrocarbon components along the pathway, and calculates the phase fractionation that will occur as the hydrocarbons move upward down the geothermal and fluid pressure gradients in the basin; and (7) Integrate the above components into a functional model implemented on a PC or low cost workstation.

Blanco, Mario; Cathles, Lawrence; Manhardt, Paul; Meulbroek, Peter; Tang, Yongchun

2003-02-13T23:59:59.000Z

183

KE Basin Sludge Flocculant Testing  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In the revised path forward and schedule for the K Basins Sludge Retrieval and Disposal Project, the sludge in K East (KE) Basin will be moved from the floor and pits and transferred to large, free-standing containers located in the pits (so as to isolate the sludge from the basin). When the sludge is pumped into the containers, it must settle fast enough and clarify sufficiently that the overflow water returned to the basin pool will not cloud the water or significantly increase the radiological dose rate to the operations staff as a result of increased suspended radioactive material. The approach being evaluated to enhance sludge settling and speed the rate of clarification is to add a flocculant to the sludge while it is being transferred to the containers. In February 2004, seven commercial flocculants were tested with a specific K Basin sludge simulant to identify those agents that demonstrated good performance over a broad range of slurry solids concentrations. From this testing, a cationic polymer flocculant, Nalco Optimer 7194 Plus (7194+), was shown to exhibit superior performance. Related prior testing with K Basin sludge and simulant in 1994/1996 had also identified this agent as promising. In March 2004, four series of jar tests were conducted with 7194+ and actual KE Basin sludge (prepared by combining selected archived KE sludge samples). The results from these jar tests show that 7194+ greatly improves settling of the sludge slurries and clarification of the supernatant.

Schmidt, Andrew J.; Hallen, Richard T.; Muzatko, Danielle S.; Gano, Sue

2004-06-23T23:59:59.000Z

184

Williston basin Seislog study  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper describes the results of Seislog (trade name) processing and interpretation of an east-west line in the North Dakota region of the Williston basin. Seislog processing involves inversion of the seismic trace data to produce a set of synthetic sonic logs. These resulting traces, which incorporate low-frequency velocity information, are displayed in terms of depth and isotransit times. These values are contoured and colored, based on a standard stratigraphic color scheme. The section studied is located just north of a dual producing oil pool from zones in the Ordovician Red River and Devonian Duperow Formations. A sonic log from the Long Creek 1 discovery well was digitized and filtered to match the frequency content of the original seismic data. This allows direct comparison between units in the well and the pseudosonic log (Seislog) trace nearest the well. Porosity development and lithologic units within the lower Paleozoic stratigraphic section can be correlated readily between the well and Seislog traces. Anomalous velocity zones within the Duperow and Red River Formations can be observed and correlated to producing intervals in the nearby wells. These results emphasize the importance of displaying inversion products that incorporate low-frequency data in the search for hydrocarbons in the Williston basin. The accumulations in this region are local in extent and are difficult to pinpoint by using conventional seismic data or displays. Seislog processing and displays provide a tested method for identification and delineation of interval velocity anomalies in the Red River and Duperow stratigraphic sections. These techniques can significantly reduce risks in both exploration and delineation drilling of these types of targets.

Mummery, R.C.

1985-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

185

Rivanna River Basin Commission (Virginia)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Rivanna River Basin Commission is an independent local entity tasked with providing guidance for the stewardship and enhancement of the water quality and natural resources of the Rivanna River...

186

Coal Supply Basin Destination State  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

Implicit Price Deflators for Gross Domestic Product, as published by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. For the composition of coal basins, refer to the definition of...

187

GRR/Section 19-CO-h - Denver Basin and Designated Basin Permitting Process  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

9-CO-h - Denver Basin and Designated Basin Permitting Process 9-CO-h - Denver Basin and Designated Basin Permitting Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 19-CO-h - Denver Basin and Designated Basin Permitting Process 19COHDenverBasinAndDesignatedBasinPermittingProcess.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Colorado Ground Water Commission Colorado Division of Water Resources Regulations & Policies CRS 37-90-107 Application for Use of Ground Water 2 CCR 410-1 Rules and Regulations for the Management and Control of Designated Ground Water Triggers None specified Click "Edit With Form" above to add content 19COHDenverBasinAndDesignatedBasinPermittingProcess.pdf 19COHDenverBasinAndDesignatedBasinPermittingProcess.pdf

188

K Basins Sludge Treatment Process | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

K Basins Sludge Treatment Process K Basins Sludge Treatment Process Full Document and Summary Versions are available for download K Basins Sludge Treatment Process Summary - K...

189

K Basins Sludge Treatment Project Phase 1 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

K Basins Sludge Treatment Project Phase 1 K Basins Sludge Treatment Project Phase 1 Full Document and Summary Versions are available for download K Basins Sludge Treatment Project...

190

E-Print Network 3.0 - alfonso basin gulf Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Source: Ecole Polytechnique, Centre de mathmatiques Collection: Mathematics 70 World Shale Gas Resources: An Initial Assessment of 14 Regions Summary: Figure II-1 Onshore Shale...

191

Targeted technology applications for infield reserve growth: A synopsis of the Secondary Natural Gas Recovery project, Gulf Coast Basin. Topical report, September 1988--April 1993  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Secondary Natural Gas Recovery (SGR): Targeted Technology Applications for Infield Reserve Growth is a joint venture research project sponsored by the Gas Research Institute (GRI), the US Department of Energy (DOE), the State of Texas through the Bureau of Economic Geology at The University of Texas at Austin, with the cofunding and cooperation of the natural gas industry. The SGR project is a field-based program using an integrated multidisciplinary approach that integrates geology, geophysics, engineering, and petrophysics. A major objective of this research project is to develop, test, and verify those technologies and methodologies that have near- to mid-term potential for maximizing recovery of gas from conventional reservoirs in known fields. Natural gas reservoirs in the Gulf Coast Basin are targeted as data-rich, field-based models for evaluating infield development. The SGR research program focuses on sandstone-dominated reservoirs in fluvial-deltaic plays within the onshore Gulf Coast Basin of Texas. The primary project research objectives are: To establish how depositional and diagenetic heterogeneities cause, even in reservoirs of conventional permeability, reservoir compartmentalization and hence incomplete recovery of natural gas. To document examples of reserve growth occurrence and potential from fluvial and deltaic sandstones of the Texas Gulf Coast Basin as a natural laboratory for developing concepts and testing applications. To demonstrate how the integration of geology, reservoir engineering, geophysics, and well log analysis/petrophysics leads to strategic recompletion and well placement opportunities for reserve growth in mature fields.

Levey, R.A.; Finley, R.J.; Hardage, B.A.

1994-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

192

Outer Continental Shelf oil and gas activities in the Gulf of Alaska (including Lower Cook Inlt) and their onshore impacts: a summary report, September 1980  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The search for oil and gas on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) in the Gulf of Alaska subregion of the Alaska leasing region began in 1967, when geophysical surveys of the area were initiated. Two lease sales have been held in the subregion. Lease Sale 39, for the Northern Gulf of Alaska, was held on April 13, 1976, and resulted in the leasing of 76 tracts. Lease Sale CI, for Lower Cook Inlet, was held on October 27, 1977, and resulted in the leasing of 87 tracts. Exploratory drilling on the tracts leased in Sale 39 began in September 1976, and exploratory drilling on tracts leased in Sale CI began in July 1978. Commercial amounts of hydrocarbons have not been found in any of the wells drilled in either sale area. Seventy-four of the leases issued in the Northern Gulf of Alaska have been relinquished. As of June 1980, exploratory drilling in both areas had ceased, and none was planned for the near future. The next lease sale in the Gulf of Alaska, Sale 55, is scheduled for October 1980. Lease Sale 60 (Lower Cook Inlet and Shelikof Strait) is scheduled for September 1981, and Lease Sale 61 (OCS off Kodiak Island) is scheduled for April 1983. Sale 60 will be coordinated with a State lease sale in adjacent State-owned waters. The most recent estimates (June 1980) by the US Geological Survey of risked, economically recoverable resources for the 2 tracts currently under lease in the Northern Gulf of Alaska are negligible. For the 87 tracts currently under lease in Lower Cook Inlet, the USGS has produced risked, economically recoverable resource estimates of 35 million barrels of oil and 26 billion cubic feet of gas. These resource estimates for the leased tracts in both areas are short of commercially producible amounts. Onshore impacts from OCS exploration have been minimal. Two communities - Yakutat and Seward - served as support bases for the Northern Gulf of Alaska.

Jackson, J.B.; Dorrier, R.T.

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

193

Shale Natural Gas New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1,613 1,149 699 2009-2011 1,613 1,149 699 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 1,613 1,149 699 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 2011-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 2011-2011 Colorado 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 1,377 172 140 2009-2011 North 1,377 172 140 2009-2011 Michigan 0 0 0 2009-2011 Montana 0 0 1 2009-2011 New Mexico 0 0 0 2009-2011 East 0 0 0 2009-2011 West 0 0 0 2009-2011 North Dakota 1 1 2 2009-2011 Ohio 0 0 2009-2010 Oklahoma 162 0 0 2009-2011 Pennsylvania 0 871 319 2009-2011 Texas 65 36 93 2009-2011 RRC District 1 0 14 0 2009-2011 RRC District 2 Onshore 2 81 2010-2011 RRC District 3 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 RRC District 4 Onshore 30 0 12 2009-2011 RRC District 5

194

Shale Natural Gas Reserves Sales  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

563 1,685 22,694 2009-2011 563 1,685 22,694 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 563 1,685 22,694 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 3 336 6,087 2009-2011 California 0 2011-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 2011-2011 Colorado 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 45 2009-2011 Louisiana 3 11 3,782 2009-2011 North 3 11 3,782 2009-2011 Michigan 0 553 682 2009-2011 Montana 2 1 42 2009-2011 New Mexico 0 0 0 2009-2011 East 0 0 0 2009-2011 West 0 0 0 2009-2011 North Dakota 1 28 115 2009-2011 Ohio 0 0 2009-2010 Oklahoma 0 0 1,591 2009-2011 Pennsylvania 0 163 209 2009-2011 Texas 554 580 9,926 2009-2011 RRC District 1 0 409 1,132 2009-2011 RRC District 2 Onshore 0 61 2010-2011 RRC District 3 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 RRC District 4 Onshore 0 0 75 2009-2011

195

Shale Natural Gas New Field Discoveries  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

868 557 232 2009-2011 868 557 232 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 868 557 232 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 2011-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 2011-2011 Colorado 4 0 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 244 48 0 2009-2011 North 244 48 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 2 0 2009-2011 Montana 0 0 0 2009-2011 New Mexico 0 0 0 2009-2011 East 0 0 0 2009-2011 West 0 0 0 2009-2011 North Dakota 6 8 2 2009-2011 Ohio 0 0 2009-2010 Oklahoma 0 54 37 2009-2011 Pennsylvania 120 49 162 2009-2011 Texas 353 396 31 2009-2011 RRC District 1 353 114 20 2009-2011 RRC District 2 Onshore 282 0 2010-2011 RRC District 3 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 RRC District 4 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 RRC District 5 0 0 0 2009-2011

196

Shale Natural Gas New Field Discoveries  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

868 557 232 2009-2011 868 557 232 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 868 557 232 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 2011-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 2011-2011 Colorado 4 0 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 244 48 0 2009-2011 North 244 48 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 2 0 2009-2011 Montana 0 0 0 2009-2011 New Mexico 0 0 0 2009-2011 East 0 0 0 2009-2011 West 0 0 0 2009-2011 North Dakota 6 8 2 2009-2011 Ohio 0 0 2009-2010 Oklahoma 0 54 37 2009-2011 Pennsylvania 120 49 162 2009-2011 Texas 353 396 31 2009-2011 RRC District 1 353 114 20 2009-2011 RRC District 2 Onshore 282 0 2010-2011 RRC District 3 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 RRC District 4 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 RRC District 5 0 0 0 2009-2011

197

Great Basin | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Great Basin Great Basin Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Geothermal Resource Area: Great Basin Contents 1 Area Overview 2 History and Infrastructure 3 Regulatory and Environmental Issues 4 Exploration History 5 Well Field Description 6 Geology of the Area 7 Geofluid Geochemistry 8 NEPA-Related Analyses (0) 9 Exploration Activities (0) 10 References Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"TERRAIN","zoom":6,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"500px","height":"300px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":39.609920257001,"lon":-114.0380859375,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

198

Denver Basin Map | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Map Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: Denver Basin Map Abstract This webpage contains a map of the Denver Basin. Published Colorado...

199

Coos Bay Field Gulf Coast Coal Region Williston Basin Illinois  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

San Juan Basin C e n t r a l A p p a l a c h i a n B a s i n Michigan Basin Greater Green River Basin Black Warrior Basin North Central Coal Region Arkoma Basin Denver Basin...

200

Hydrogeochemical Indicators for Great Basin Geothemal Resources  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Hydrogeochemical Indicators for Great Basin Geothemal Resources presentation at the April 2013 peer review meeting held in Denver, Colorado.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "joaquin basin onshore" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Atlas of the Columbia River Basin  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

#12;Atlas of the Columbia River Basin Oregon State University Computer-Assisted Cartography Course & GEOVISUALIZATION GROUP UNIVERSITY #12;2013 Oregon State University Atlas of the Columbia River Basin FOREWORDAtlas, Montana, Nevada, Wyoming, and Utah. 2013 Oregon State University Atlas of the Columbia River Basin

Jenny, Bernhard

202

LAND USE AND OWNERSHIP, WILLISTON BASIN  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Chapter WM LAND USE AND OWNERSHIP, WILLISTON BASIN By T.T. Taber and S.A. Kinney In U.S. Geological........................................WM-1 Map Information for the Williston Basin Land Use And Land Cover Map.........................................................WM-2 Map Information for the Williston Basin Subsurface Ownership map

203

Effects of military-authorized activities on the San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes velox macrotis) at Camp Roberts Army National Guard Training Site, California  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The effects of military-authorized activities on San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes velox macrotis) were investigated at Camp Roberts Army National Guard Training Site from 1988 to 1991. Military-authorized activities included military training exercises, facilities maintenance, new construction, controlled burning, livestock grazing, and public-access hunting. Positive effects of the military included habitat preservation, preactivity surveys, and natural resources management practices designed to conserve kit foxes and their habitat. Perceived negative effects such as entrapment in dens, shootings during military exercises, and accidental poisoning were not observed. Foxes were observed in areas being used simultaneously by military units. Authorized activities were known to have caused the deaths of three of 52 radiocollared foxes recovered dead: one became entangled in concertina wire, one was believed shot by a hunter, and one was struck by a vehicle. Entanglement in communication wire may have contributed to the death of another radiocollared fox that was killed by a predator. Approximately 10% of kit fox dens encountered showed evidence of vehicle traffic, but denning sites did not appear to be a limiting factor for kit foxes.

Berry, W.H.; Standley, W.G.; O`Farrell, T.P.; Kato, T.T.

1992-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

204

Dry Natural Gas Reserves Sales  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2,850 14,740 7,603 4,109 10,153 43,186 2000-2011 2,850 14,740 7,603 4,109 10,153 43,186 2000-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 2,718 897 700 158 880 318 2000-2011 Pacific (California) 0 1 0 0 0 0 2000-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 1,532 803 616 124 741 295 2000-2011 Texas 1,186 93 84 34 139 23 2000-2011 Alaska 0 10 0 5 131 36 2000-2011 Lower 48 States 22,850 14,730 7,603 4,104 10,022 43,150 2000-2011 Alabama 188 302 10 2 263 573 2000-2011 Arkansas 4 298 19 54 393 6,760 2000-2011 California 274 164 8 4 3 47 2000-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 70 4 6 0 1 0 2000-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 35 0 1 0 0 0 2000-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 169 158 1 4 2 45 2000-2011 State Offshore 0 2 0 0 0 2 2000-2011 Colorado 1,539 750 747 374 242 1,244 2000-2011

205

Table 13. Associated-dissolved natural gas proved reserves, reserves changes, and production, wet after lease separation, 2011  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

: Associated-dissolved natural gas proved reserves, reserves changes, and production, wet after lease separation, 2011 : Associated-dissolved natural gas proved reserves, reserves changes, and production, wet after lease separation, 2011 billion cubic feet Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries Estimated Proved Reserves Adjustments Increases Decreases Sales Acquisitions Extensions Discoveries in Old Fields Production Reserves State and Subdivision 12/31/10 (+,-) (+) (-) (-) (+) (+) (+) (+) (-) 12/31/11 Alaska 7,896 -1 843 79 2 51 3 0 0 176 8,535 Lower 48 States 27,850 391 7,245 5,874 1,336 1,833 5,954 611 160 2,546 34,288 Alabama 38 3 2 0 9 20 0 2 0 8 48 Arkansas 29 24 50 13 38 0 0 0 0 6 46 California 2,282 929 1,424 1,927 1 11 74 0 0 260 2,532 Coastal Region Onshore 178 15 21 31 0 0 1 0 0 12 172 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 92 6 12 4 0 3 0 0 0 7 102 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 1,949 907 1,382 1,892 0 0 70 0 0 237 2,179 State Offshore 63 1 9 0 1 8 3 0 0 4 79

206

Nonassociated Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases, Wet After Lease  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

20,957 15,664 27,810 31,865 34,375 50,174 1979-2011 20,957 15,664 27,810 31,865 34,375 50,174 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 1,887 1,561 1,631 1,400 1,433 1,711 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 48 0 5 3 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 1,445 1,172 1,073 1,021 1,000 1,219 1981-2011 Texas 442 389 510 379 428 489 1981-2011 Alaska 267 103 153 103 195 128 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 20,690 15,561 27,657 31,762 34,180 50,046 1979-2011 Alabama 205 35 747 336 176 163 1979-2011 Arkansas 112 139 161 621 301 311 1979-2011 California 49 186 129 60 87 32 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 5 0 1 0 1 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 49 180 128 59 84 31 1979-2011 State Offshore 0 1 1 0 3 0 1979-2011

207

New Field Discoveries of Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

425 814 1,229 1,423 895 987 1979-2011 425 814 1,229 1,423 895 987 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 114 618 321 310 71 590 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 85 313 288 50 71 590 1981-2011 Texas 29 305 33 260 0 0 1981-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 425 814 1,229 1,423 895 987 1979-2011 Alabama 0 0 2 0 3 2 1979-2011 Arkansas 7 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 California 0 0 0 1 1 0 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 1 1 0 1979-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Colorado 15 15 18 8 23 19 1979-2011 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Kansas 0 0 10 0 4 0 1979-2011 Kentucky

208

Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases, Wet After  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

5,372 5,400 2,943 5,522 4,983 8,088 1979-2011 5,372 5,400 2,943 5,522 4,983 8,088 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 525 622 609 854 1,028 1,583 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 35 48 23 71 23 39 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 384 514 383 693 907 1,410 1981-2011 Texas 106 60 203 90 98 134 1981-2011 Alaska 2,850 2,098 37 1,696 236 843 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 2,522 3,302 2,906 3,826 4,747 7,245 1979-2011 Alabama 4 12 1 11 6 2 1979-2011 Arkansas 2 11 3 5 12 50 1979-2011 California 96 292 164 177 525 1,424 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 29 33 21 42 38 21 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 7 16 1 38 9 12 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 53 231 142 95 467 1,382 1979-2011 State Offshore 7 12 0 2 11 9 1979-2011 Colorado 234 214 211 11 142 122 1979-2011

209

Nonassociated Natural Gas New Field Discoveries, Wet After Lease Separation  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

385 768 1,122 1,160 793 376 1979-2011 385 768 1,122 1,160 793 376 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 87 575 228 96 65 66 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 58 309 195 25 65 66 1981-2011 Texas 29 266 33 71 0 0 1981-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 385 768 1,122 1,160 793 376 1979-2011 Alabama 0 0 2 0 1 0 1979-2011 Arkansas 7 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 California 0 0 0 1 1 0 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 1 1 0 1979-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Colorado 15 15 18 8 23 19 1979-2011 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Kansas 0 0 6 0 3 0 1979-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 0 0 2 1979-2011

210

Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields,  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

65 73 820 169 186 160 1979-2011 65 73 820 169 186 160 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 32 54 297 122 150 42 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 1 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 24 47 222 81 138 42 1981-2011 Texas 7 7 75 41 12 0 1981-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 65 73 820 169 186 160 1979-2011 Alabama 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Arkansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 California 0 0 9 0 0 0 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 9 0 0 0 1979-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Colorado 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Kansas 0 0 1 0 0 0 1979-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011

211

Natural Gas Liquids Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

7,459 7,928 8,165 8,472 9,143 9,275 1979-2008 7,459 7,928 8,165 8,472 9,143 9,275 1979-2008 Federal Offshore U.S. 725 721 696 653 624 548 1981-2008 Pacific (California) 8 8 8 4 4 1 1979-2008 Louisiana & Alabama 598 615 603 575 528 464 1981-2008 Texas 119 98 85 74 92 83 1981-2008 Alaska 387 369 352 338 325 312 1979-2008 Lower 48 States 7,072 7,559 7,813 8,134 8,818 8,963 1979-2008 Alabama 60 50 61 56 53 106 1979-2008 Arkansas 3 3 3 4 3 2 1979-2008 California 101 122 137 132 126 113 1979-2008 Coastal Region Onshore 15 19 16 22 14 10 1979-2008 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 8 8 9 10 9 6 1979-2008 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 78 95 112 100 103 97 1979-2008 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Colorado 395 465 484 478 559 716 1979-2008

212

Nonassociated Natural Gas Reserves Sales, Wet After Lease Separation  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

2,178 14,403 7,249 3,813 9,436 43,237 2000-2011 2,178 14,403 7,249 3,813 9,436 43,237 2000-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 2,317 763 672 142 827 266 2000-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 1,261 674 587 108 697 243 2000-2011 Texas 1,056 89 85 34 130 23 2000-2011 Alaska 0 8 0 4 132 34 2000-2011 Lower 48 States 22,178 14,395 7,249 3,809 9,304 43,203 2000-2011 Alabama 188 303 11 2 270 586 2000-2011 Arkansas 4 298 19 49 393 6,724 2000-2011 California 154 165 1 0 2 48 2000-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 2 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 152 165 1 0 2 47 2000-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 1 2000-2011 Colorado 1,009 769 774 382 253 1,292 2000-2011

213

Natural Gas Liquids Reserves Sales  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

03 442 440 931 670 282 2000-2008 03 442 440 931 670 282 2000-2008 Federal Offshore U.S. 84 59 35 104 41 27 2000-2008 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2008 Louisiana & Alabama 77 57 34 84 40 27 2000-2008 Texas 7 2 1 20 1 0 2000-2008 Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2008 Lower 48 States 403 442 440 931 670 282 2000-2008 Alabama 4 5 14 17 4 0 2000-2008 Arkansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2008 California 2 5 8 17 7 0 2000-2008 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 7 0 0 2000-2008 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 1 0 0 2 0 0 2000-2008 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 1 5 8 8 7 0 2000-2008 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2008 Colorado 10 71 33 70 22 21 2000-2008 Florida 0 0 0 0 1 0 2000-2008 Kansas 12 8 2 1 3 1 2000-2008 Kentucky 0 0 0 21 0 0 2000-2008

214

Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions, Wet After Lease  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

960 1,350 938 678 2,469 1,884 2000-2011 960 1,350 938 678 2,469 1,884 2000-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 360 231 74 21 250 56 2000-2011 Pacific (California) 0 3 0 0 0 0 2000-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 234 219 68 12 222 49 2000-2011 Texas 126 9 6 9 28 7 2000-2011 Alaska 0 1 0 0 0 51 2000-2011 Lower 48 States 1,960 1,349 938 678 2,469 1,833 2000-2011 Alabama 0 1 1 0 0 20 2000-2011 Arkansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2011 California 219 9 8 58 0 11 2000-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 60 6 6 0 0 0 2000-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 41 0 1 0 0 3 2000-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 118 3 1 58 0 0 2000-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 8 2000-2011 Colorado 579 15 14 10 160 5 2000-2011 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2011 Kansas 0 0 0 0 3 1 2000-2011

215

Nonassociated Natural Gas Estimated Production, Wet After Lease Separation  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

7,092 18,022 19,066 19,981 20,779 21,899 1979-2011 7,092 18,022 19,066 19,981 20,779 21,899 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 2,206 2,178 1,745 1,779 1,660 1,210 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 2 2 2 1 1 0 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 1,574 1,628 1,371 1,425 1,318 960 1981-2011 Texas 630 548 372 353 341 250 1981-2011 Alaska 192 164 149 136 145 152 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 16,900 17,858 18,917 19,845 20,634 21,747 1979-2011 Alabama 286 273 262 256 225 218 1979-2011 Arkansas 183 265 454 694 948 1,074 1979-2011 California 88 101 88 80 69 64 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 87 99 86 78 68 63 1979-2011 State Offshore 1 2 2 2 1 1 1979-2011 Colorado

216

Natural Gas Plant Liquids Proved Reserves  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Liquids Proved Reserves Liquids Proved Reserves (Million Barrels) Period: Annual Download Series History Download Series History Definitions, Sources & Notes Definitions, Sources & Notes 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 View History U.S. 7,133 7,648 7,842 8,557 9,809 10,825 1979-2011 Alabama 41 32 92 55 68 68 1979-2011 Alaska 338 325 312 299 288 288 1979-2011 Arkansas 2 2 1 2 2 3 1979-2011 California 130 126 113 129 114 94 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 22 14 10 10 11 12 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 8 9 6 6 5 4 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 100 103 97 113 98 78 1979-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Colorado 382 452 612 722 879 925 1979-2011 Florida 3 2 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Kansas 204 194 175 162 195 192 1979-2011

217

Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

743 1,147 207 5,098 509 1,731 1977-2011 743 1,147 207 5,098 509 1,731 1977-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. -39 -62 14 22 -123 -28 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 2 -7 -1 0 0 -1 1977-2011 Louisiana & Alabama -37 -16 10 2 -106 -28 1981-2011 Texas -4 -39 5 20 -17 1 1981-2011 Alaska -46 1 -3 3 1 -1 1977-2011 Lower 48 States 789 1,146 210 5,095 508 1,732 1977-2011 Alabama -11 12 -71 46 32 -49 1977-2011 Arkansas -26 -27 -64 5 -34 728 1977-2011 California -74 33 -6 11 10 923 1977-2011 Coastal Region Onshore -62 3 0 2 1 13 1977-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 2 5 5 7 1977-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore -12 31 -8 2 4 902 1977-2011 State Offshore 0 -1 0 2 0 1 1977-2011 Colorado 52 136 -250 306 449 801 1977-2011 Florida 2 4 79 6 64 -54 1977-2011

218

Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments, Wet After Lease  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

-54 276 455 877 -482 390 1979-2011 -54 276 455 877 -482 390 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 -4 7 12 -14 -22 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 1 -5 0 1 1 -1 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 0 0 8 7 -14 -21 1981-2011 Texas -1 1 -1 4 -1 0 1981-2011 Alaska -1 1 -1 1 -1 -1 1979-2011 Lower 48 States -53 275 456 876 -481 391 1979-2011 Alabama 1 -1 0 5 13 3 1979-2011 Arkansas 3 -7 3 12 -3 24 1979-2011 California -62 6 1 6 7 929 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore -64 2 1 2 2 15 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore -1 2 4 4 3 6 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 2 3 -4 -2 2 907 1979-2011 State Offshore 1 -1 0 2 0 1 1979-2011 Colorado -2 9 -4 14 68 -38 1979-2011 Florida 1 -1 78 6 31 -28 1979-2011 Kansas 3 8 4 -5 -2 -4 1979-2011

219

Lease Condensate Estimated Production  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

82 181 173 178 224 231 1979-2011 82 181 173 178 224 231 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 58 58 41 48 48 40 1981-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 37 40 28 28 28 24 1981-2011 Texas 21 18 13 20 20 16 1981-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 20 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 182 181 173 178 224 211 1979-2011 Alabama 2 2 2 2 2 2 1979-2011 Arkansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 California 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Colorado 6 6 7 7 7 8 1979-2011 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Kansas 1 1 1 1 2 1 1979-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011

220

Nonassociated Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments, Wet After Lease Separation  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

,000 714 -184 5,046 1,774 2,325 1979-2011 ,000 714 -184 5,046 1,774 2,325 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. -11 -46 -1 2 -41 73 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 -1 0 0 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama -10 1 -11 -3 -25 72 1981-2011 Texas -1 -47 10 6 -16 1 1981-2011 Alaska -49 1 -1 1 -2 -1 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 1,049 713 -183 5,045 1,776 2,326 1979-2011 Alabama -3 2 -7 42 47 -48 1979-2011 Arkansas -31 -22 -67 -8 -31 705 1979-2011 California -11 29 3 2 -3 -12 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 1 0 0 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore -11 28 3 1 -3 -12 1979-2011 State Offshore 0 1 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Colorado 44 91 -70 474 578 921 1979-2011 Florida 0 0 0 0 33 -26 1979-2011

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "joaquin basin onshore" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Natural Gas Reserves Extensions, Wet After Lease Separation  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

22,834 28,255 27,800 43,500 46,283 47,635 1979-2011 22,834 28,255 27,800 43,500 46,283 47,635 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 751 675 924 298 333 98 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 547 543 630 279 193 85 1981-2011 Texas 204 132 294 19 140 13 1981-2011 Alaska 50 28 18 2 15 4 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 22,784 28,227 27,782 43,498 46,268 47,631 1979-2011 Alabama 150 125 61 21 29 3 1979-2011 Arkansas 492 1,149 1,755 4,629 3,083 2,094 1979-2011 California 186 18 107 476 13 75 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 5 0 0 0 0 1 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 4 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 176 14 102 472 9 71 1979-2011 State Offshore 1 4 5 4 4 3 1979-2011 Colorado 2,042 2,893 2,379 3,495 2,986 2,123 1979-2011

222

New Field Discoveries of Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

425 814 1,229 1,423 895 987 1979-2011 425 814 1,229 1,423 895 987 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 114 618 321 310 71 590 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 85 313 288 50 71 590 1981-2011 Texas 29 305 33 260 0 0 1981-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 425 814 1,229 1,423 895 987 1979-2011 Alabama 0 0 2 0 3 2 1979-2011 Arkansas 7 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 California 0 0 0 1 1 0 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 1 1 0 1979-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Colorado 15 15 18 8 23 19 1979-2011 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Kansas 0 0 10 0 4 0 1979-2011 Kentucky

223

Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases, Wet After  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

2,782 1,804 7,385 2,698 3,964 5,953 1979-2011 2,782 1,804 7,385 2,698 3,964 5,953 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 984 351 430 517 879 1,393 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 22 10 38 7 5 18 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 827 304 282 442 841 1,152 1981-2011 Texas 135 37 110 68 33 223 1981-2011 Alaska 111 10 3,954 5 260 79 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 2,671 1,794 3,431 2,693 3,704 5,874 1979-2011 Alabama 8 1 0 1 4 0 1979-2011 Arkansas 2 7 28 0 0 13 1979-2011 California 391 102 388 139 389 1,927 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 12 22 72 14 17 31 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 31 17 71 25 5 4 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 341 49 217 97 367 1,892 1979-2011 State Offshore 7 14 28 3 0 0 1979-2011 Colorado 35 14 50 185 71 269 1979-2011

224

Natural Gas Liquids New Field Discoveries  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

35 26 32 16 30 65 1979-2008 35 26 32 16 30 65 1979-2008 Federal Offshore U.S. 25 7 21 6 24 22 1981-2008 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Louisiana & Alabama 25 7 21 6 13 22 1981-2008 Texas 0 0 0 0 11 0 1981-2008 Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Lower 48 States 35 26 32 16 30 65 1979-2008 Alabama 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Arkansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 California 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Colorado 0 4 1 0 0 0 1979-2008 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Kansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Kentucky 0 0 1 0 0 0 1979-2008 Louisiana 0 0 0 1 0 3 1981-2008

225

New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields of Natural Gas, Wet After Lease  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1,197 1,244 1,678 2,656 1,701 1,260 1979-2011 1,197 1,244 1,678 2,656 1,701 1,260 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 420 379 545 308 245 80 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 1 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 353 341 391 231 221 80 1981-2011 Texas 66 38 154 77 24 0 1981-2011 Alaska 2 0 5 0 0 3 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 1,195 1,244 1,673 2,656 1,701 1,257 1979-2011 Alabama 7 17 1 0 0 0 1979-2011 Arkansas 33 27 41 36 27 23 1979-2011 California 4 1 16 0 0 0 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 1 1 16 0 0 0 1979-2011 State Offshore 3 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Colorado 27 24 17 0 29 0 1979-2011 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Kansas 3 0 3 0 1 1 1979-2011

226

Natural Gas Reserves Sales, Wet After Lease Separation  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

3,904 15,518 7,911 4,377 10,582 44,575 2000-2011 3,904 15,518 7,911 4,377 10,582 44,575 2000-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 2,772 924 720 162 910 332 2000-2011 Pacific (California) 0 1 0 0 0 0 2000-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 1,581 830 635 128 771 309 2000-2011 Texas 1,191 93 85 34 139 23 2000-2011 Alaska 0 11 0 5 132 36 2000-2011 Lower 48 States 23,904 15,507 7,911 4,372 10,450 44,539 2000-2011 Alabama 192 308 11 2 272 595 2000-2011 Arkansas 4 298 19 54 393 6,762 2000-2011 California 287 173 8 4 3 49 2000-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 72 4 6 0 1 0 2000-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 37 0 1 0 0 0 2000-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 178 167 1 4 2 47 2000-2011 State Offshore 0 2 0 0 0 2 2000-2011 Colorado 1,587 772 775 391 255 1,311 2000-2011

227

Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

743 1,147 207 5,098 509 1,731 1977-2011 743 1,147 207 5,098 509 1,731 1977-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. -39 -62 14 22 -123 -28 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 2 -7 -1 0 0 -1 1977-2011 Louisiana & Alabama -37 -16 10 2 -106 -28 1981-2011 Texas -4 -39 5 20 -17 1 1981-2011 Alaska -46 1 -3 3 1 -1 1977-2011 Lower 48 States 789 1,146 210 5,095 508 1,732 1977-2011 Alabama -11 12 -71 46 32 -49 1977-2011 Arkansas -26 -27 -64 5 -34 728 1977-2011 California -74 33 -6 11 10 923 1977-2011 Coastal Region Onshore -62 3 0 2 1 13 1977-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 2 5 5 7 1977-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore -12 31 -8 2 4 902 1977-2011 State Offshore 0 -1 0 2 0 1 1977-2011 Colorado 52 136 -250 306 449 801 1977-2011 Florida 2 4 79 6 64 -54 1977-2011

228

Estimated Production of Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

9,373 20,318 21,415 22,537 23,224 24,621 1979-2011 9,373 20,318 21,415 22,537 23,224 24,621 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 2,841 2,803 2,308 2,438 2,224 1,724 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 37 41 37 37 29 31 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 2,036 2,135 1,807 1,947 1,786 1,375 1981-2011 Texas 768 627 464 454 409 318 1981-2011 Alaska 410 391 356 361 319 328 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 18,963 19,927 21,059 22,176 22,905 24,293 1979-2011 Alabama 290 277 265 261 231 226 1979-2011 Arkansas 188 269 457 698 952 1,080 1979-2011 California 268 264 251 251 255 324 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 9 12 11 12 12 12 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 8 8 7 7 6 7 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 244 238 229 226 232 300 1979-2011 State Offshore 7 6 4 6 5 5 1979-2011

229

Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions, Wet After Lease Separation  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

7,082 15,970 8,848 4,155 13,348 47,873 2000-2011 7,082 15,970 8,848 4,155 13,348 47,873 2000-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 2,624 1,218 632 186 1,034 474 2000-2011 Pacific (California) 0 3 0 0 0 0 2000-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 1,384 1,023 549 164 816 404 2000-2011 Texas 1,240 192 83 22 218 70 2000-2011 Alaska 0 6 0 0 0 222 2000-2011 Lower 48 States 27,082 15,964 8,848 4,155 13,348 47,651 2000-2011 Alabama 259 386 21 0 153 398 2000-2011 Arkansas 5 280 5 36 807 6,882 2000-2011 California 266 243 31 83 0 55 2000-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 60 6 6 0 0 0 2000-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 41 0 1 0 0 3 2000-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 165 237 24 83 0 44 2000-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 8 2000-2011 Colorado 1,588 463 1,396 456 241 1,283 2000-2011

230

Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Production Production (Million Barrels) Period: Annual Download Series History Download Series History Definitions, Sources & Notes Definitions, Sources & Notes 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 View History U.S. 629 650 667 714 745 784 1979-2011 Alabama 3 2 7 5 6 6 1979-2011 Alaska 14 13 13 13 11 11 1979-2011 Arkansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 California 11 11 11 11 10 10 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 1 1 1 1 1 1 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 10 10 10 10 9 9 1979-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Colorado 26 27 38 48 58 63 1979-2011 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Kansas 18 18 18 16 16 16 1979-2011 Kentucky 3 3 3 4 5 4 1979-2011 Louisiana

231

Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields,  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

65 73 820 169 186 160 1979-2011 65 73 820 169 186 160 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 32 54 297 122 150 42 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 1 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 24 47 222 81 138 42 1981-2011 Texas 7 7 75 41 12 0 1981-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 65 73 820 169 186 160 1979-2011 Alabama 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Arkansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 California 0 0 9 0 0 0 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 9 0 0 0 1979-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Colorado 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Kansas 0 0 1 0 0 0 1979-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011

232

Nonassociated Natural Gas New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields, Wet  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1,132 1,171 858 2,487 1,515 1,100 1979-2011 1,132 1,171 858 2,487 1,515 1,100 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 388 325 248 186 95 38 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 329 294 169 150 83 38 1981-2011 Texas 59 31 79 36 12 0 1981-2011 Alaska 2 0 5 0 0 3 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 1,130 1,171 853 2,487 1,515 1,097 1979-2011 Alabama 7 17 1 0 0 0 1979-2011 Arkansas 33 27 41 36 27 23 1979-2011 California 4 1 7 0 0 0 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 1 1 7 0 0 0 1979-2011 State Offshore 3 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Colorado 27 24 17 0 29 0 1979-2011 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Kansas 3 0 2 0 1 1 1979-2011

233

Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas New Field Discoveries, Wet After Lease  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

40 46 107 263 102 611 1979-2011 40 46 107 263 102 611 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 27 43 93 214 6 524 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 27 4 93 25 6 524 1981-2011 Texas 0 39 0 189 0 0 1981-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 40 46 107 263 102 611 1979-2011 Alabama 0 0 0 0 2 2 1979-2011 Arkansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 California 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Colorado 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Kansas 0 0 4 0 1 0 1979-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011

234

Nonassociated Natural Gas Estimated Production, Wet After Lease Separation  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

7,092 18,022 19,066 19,981 20,779 21,899 1979-2011 7,092 18,022 19,066 19,981 20,779 21,899 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 2,206 2,178 1,745 1,779 1,660 1,210 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 2 2 2 1 1 0 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 1,574 1,628 1,371 1,425 1,318 960 1981-2011 Texas 630 548 372 353 341 250 1981-2011 Alaska 192 164 149 136 145 152 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 16,900 17,858 18,917 19,845 20,634 21,747 1979-2011 Alabama 286 273 262 256 225 218 1979-2011 Arkansas 183 265 454 694 948 1,074 1979-2011 California 88 101 88 80 69 64 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 87 99 86 78 68 63 1979-2011 State Offshore 1 2 2 2 1 1 1979-2011 Colorado

235

Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions, Wet After Lease Separation  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

7,082 15,970 8,848 4,155 13,348 47,873 2000-2011 7,082 15,970 8,848 4,155 13,348 47,873 2000-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 2,624 1,218 632 186 1,034 474 2000-2011 Pacific (California) 0 3 0 0 0 0 2000-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 1,384 1,023 549 164 816 404 2000-2011 Texas 1,240 192 83 22 218 70 2000-2011 Alaska 0 6 0 0 0 222 2000-2011 Lower 48 States 27,082 15,964 8,848 4,155 13,348 47,651 2000-2011 Alabama 259 386 21 0 153 398 2000-2011 Arkansas 5 280 5 36 807 6,882 2000-2011 California 266 243 31 83 0 55 2000-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 60 6 6 0 0 0 2000-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 41 0 1 0 0 3 2000-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 165 237 24 83 0 44 2000-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 8 2000-2011 Colorado 1,588 463 1,396 456 241 1,283 2000-2011

236

Natural Gas Liquids Estimated Production  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

802 827 788 811 831 840 1979-2008 802 827 788 811 831 840 1979-2008 Federal Offshore U.S. 148 155 123 125 127 94 1981-2008 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Louisiana & Alabama 120 127 98 102 108 80 1981-2008 Texas 28 28 25 23 19 14 1981-2008 Alaska 18 18 17 14 13 13 1979-2008 Lower 48 States 784 809 771 797 818 827 1979-2008 Alabama 5 4 5 5 4 9 1979-2008 Arkansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 California 10 10 11 11 11 11 1979-2008 Coastal Region Onshore 1 1 1 1 1 1 1979-2008 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 9 9 10 10 10 10 1979-2008 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Colorado 29 32 31 32 33 45 1979-2008 Florida 1 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Kansas 23 22 20 19 19 19 1979-2008

237

Estimated Production of Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

9,373 20,318 21,415 22,537 23,224 24,621 1979-2011 9,373 20,318 21,415 22,537 23,224 24,621 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 2,841 2,803 2,308 2,438 2,224 1,724 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 37 41 37 37 29 31 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 2,036 2,135 1,807 1,947 1,786 1,375 1981-2011 Texas 768 627 464 454 409 318 1981-2011 Alaska 410 391 356 361 319 328 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 18,963 19,927 21,059 22,176 22,905 24,293 1979-2011 Alabama 290 277 265 261 231 226 1979-2011 Arkansas 188 269 457 698 952 1,080 1979-2011 California 268 264 251 251 255 324 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 9 12 11 12 12 12 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 8 8 7 7 6 7 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 244 238 229 226 232 300 1979-2011 State Offshore 7 6 4 6 5 5 1979-2011

238

Table 10. Total natural gas proved reserves, reserves changes, and production, wet after lease separation, 2011  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

: Total natural gas proved reserves, reserves changes, and production, wet after lease separation, 2011 : Total natural gas proved reserves, reserves changes, and production, wet after lease separation, 2011 billion cubic feet Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries Estimated Proved Reserves Adjustments Increases Decreases Sales Acquisitions Extensions Discoveries in Old Fields Production Reserves State and subdivision 12/31/10 (+,-) (+) (-) (-) (+) (+) (+) (+) (-) 12/31/11 Alaska 8,917 -2 938 207 36 222 4 0 3 328 9,511 Lower 48 States 308,730 2,717 55,077 55,920 44,539 47,651 47,631 987 1,257 24,293 339,298 Alabama 2,724 -45 472 163 595 398 3 2 0 226 2,570 Arkansas 14,181 729 631 324 6,762 6,882 2,094 0 23 1,080 16,374 California 2,785 917 1,542 1,959 49 55 75 0 0 324 3,042 Coastal Region Onshore 180 15 21 32 0 0 1 0 0 12 173 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 92 6 12 4 0 3 0 0 0 7 102 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 2,447 895 1,498

239

Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

21,778 27,107 26,687 42,139 44,783 45,909 1977-2011 21,778 27,107 26,687 42,139 44,783 45,909 1977-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 733 657 903 289 326 94 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 530 525 610 270 186 81 1981-2011 Texas 203 132 293 19 140 13 1981-2011 Alaska 49 28 18 2 14 4 1977-2011 Lower 48 States 21,729 27,079 26,669 42,137 44,769 45,905 1977-2011 Alabama 146 123 59 20 28 3 1977-2011 Arkansas 491 1,148 1,754 4,627 3,082 2,093 1977-2011 California 176 16 101 450 12 73 1977-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 5 0 0 0 0 1 1977-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 4 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 166 13 96 446 8 69 1977-2011 State Offshore 1 3 5 4 4 3 1977-2011 Colorado 1,980 2,812 2,294 3,346 2,838 2,015 1977-2011

240

Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

5,846 15,148 8,498 3,968 12,748 46,241 2000-2011 5,846 15,148 8,498 3,968 12,748 46,241 2000-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 2,575 1,185 615 181 1,003 455 2000-2011 Pacific (California) 0 3 0 0 0 0 2000-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 1,341 991 532 159 785 385 2000-2011 Texas 1,234 191 83 22 218 70 2000-2011 Alaska 0 6 0 0 0 221 2000-2011 Lower 48 States 25,846 15,142 8,498 3,968 12,748 46,020 2000-2011 Alabama 253 379 21 0 148 383 2000-2011 Arkansas 5 280 5 36 807 6,880 2000-2011 California 252 231 30 78 0 52 2000-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 58 6 6 0 0 0 2000-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 38 0 1 0 0 2 2000-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 156 225 23 78 0 42 2000-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 8 2000-2011 Colorado 1,540 450 1,346 437 229 1,218 2000-2011

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "joaquin basin onshore" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Natural Gas Liquids Reserves Extensions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

629 734 863 924 1,030 956 1979-2008 629 734 863 924 1,030 956 1979-2008 Federal Offshore U.S. 33 44 29 31 36 29 1981-2008 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Louisiana & Alabama 30 43 27 26 25 24 1981-2008 Texas 3 1 2 5 11 5 1981-2008 Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Lower 48 States 629 734 863 924 1,030 956 1979-2008 Alabama 5 2 1 3 2 2 1979-2008 Arkansas 0 0 0 0 1 0 1979-2008 California 2 5 5 8 1 4 1979-2008 Coastal Region Onshore 0 1 0 1 0 0 1979-2008 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 2 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 2 2 5 7 1 4 1979-2008 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Colorado 33 29 51 54 67 70 1979-2008 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Kansas 4 3 5 6 7 4 1979-2008 Kentucky 2 4 3 1 13 7 1979-2008

242

Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

5,846 15,148 8,498 3,968 12,748 46,241 2000-2011 5,846 15,148 8,498 3,968 12,748 46,241 2000-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 2,575 1,185 615 181 1,003 455 2000-2011 Pacific (California) 0 3 0 0 0 0 2000-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 1,341 991 532 159 785 385 2000-2011 Texas 1,234 191 83 22 218 70 2000-2011 Alaska 0 6 0 0 0 221 2000-2011 Lower 48 States 25,846 15,142 8,498 3,968 12,748 46,020 2000-2011 Alabama 253 379 21 0 148 383 2000-2011 Arkansas 5 280 5 36 807 6,880 2000-2011 California 252 231 30 78 0 52 2000-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 58 6 6 0 0 0 2000-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 38 0 1 0 0 2 2000-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 156 225 23 78 0 42 2000-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 8 2000-2011 Colorado 1,540 450 1,346 437 229 1,218 2000-2011

243

Natural Gas Liquids Reserves Extensions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

629 734 863 924 1,030 956 1979-2008 629 734 863 924 1,030 956 1979-2008 Federal Offshore U.S. 33 44 29 31 36 29 1981-2008 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Louisiana & Alabama 30 43 27 26 25 24 1981-2008 Texas 3 1 2 5 11 5 1981-2008 Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Lower 48 States 629 734 863 924 1,030 956 1979-2008 Alabama 5 2 1 3 2 2 1979-2008 Arkansas 0 0 0 0 1 0 1979-2008 California 2 5 5 8 1 4 1979-2008 Coastal Region Onshore 0 1 0 1 0 0 1979-2008 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 2 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 2 2 5 7 1 4 1979-2008 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Colorado 33 29 51 54 67 70 1979-2008 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Kansas 4 3 5 6 7 4 1979-2008 Kentucky 2 4 3 1 13 7 1979-2008

244

Dry Natural Gas Reserves Estimated Production  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

8,545 19,466 20,523 21,594 22,239 23,555 1977-2011 8,545 19,466 20,523 21,594 22,239 23,555 1977-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 2,775 2,731 2,250 2,377 2,154 1,660 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 37 40 36 37 28 31 1977-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 1,973 2,066 1,752 1,886 1,717 1,311 1981-2011 Texas 765 625 462 454 409 318 1981-2011 Alaska 408 388 354 358 317 327 1977-2011 Lower 48 States 18,137 19,078 20,169 21,236 21,922 23,228 1977-2011 Alabama 287 274 257 254 223 218 1977-2011 Arkansas 188 269 456 698 951 1,079 1977-2011 California 255 253 237 239 243 311 1977-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 9 12 11 12 12 11 1977-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 8 8 6 7 6 6 1977-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 232 227 217 214 220 289 1977-2011 State Offshore 6 6 3 6 5 5 1977-2011

245

Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved Proved Reserves, Wet After Lease  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

29,640 32,668 29,023 33,383 35,746 42,823 1979-2011 29,640 32,668 29,023 33,383 35,746 42,823 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 4,835 4,780 5,106 5,223 5,204 5,446 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 756 752 702 731 722 711 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 3,701 3,651 3,939 3,863 3,793 4,196 1981-2011 Texas 378 377 465 629 689 539 1981-2011 Alaska 8,886 10,752 6,627 8,093 7,896 8,535 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 20,754 21,916 22,396 25,290 27,850 34,288 1979-2011 Alabama 18 20 19 29 38 48 1979-2011 Arkansas 44 37 12 20 29 46 1979-2011 California 2,155 2,193 1,917 2,314 2,282 2,532 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 208 211 150 168 178 172 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 161 154 81 91 92 102 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 1,701 1,749 1,632 2,002 1,949 2,179 1979-2011

246

Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas Reserves Extensions, Wet After Lease  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

810 1,098 1,488 2,669 2,660 5,957 1979-2011 810 1,098 1,488 2,669 2,660 5,957 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 61 136 287 90 87 32 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 60 133 280 90 54 32 1981-2011 Texas 1 3 7 0 33 0 1981-2011 Alaska 4 6 0 0 2 3 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 806 1,092 1,488 2,669 2,658 5,954 1979-2011 Alabama 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Arkansas 0 0 0 0 4 0 1979-2011 California 21 4 100 470 12 74 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 5 0 0 0 0 1 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 4 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 11 1 95 468 9 70 1979-2011 State Offshore 1 3 5 2 3 3 1979-2011 Colorado 113 180 127 165 318 506 1979-2011 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Kansas 1 6 6 1 3 53 1979-2011

247

Table 11. Dry natural gas proved reserves, reserves changes, and production, 2011  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

: Dry natural gas proved reserves, reserves changes, and production, 2011 : Dry natural gas proved reserves, reserves changes, and production, 2011 billion cubic feet Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries Estimated Proved Reserves Adjustments Increases Decreases Sales Acquisitions Extensions Discoveries in Old Fields Production Reserves State and Subdivision 12/31/10 (+,-) (+) (-) (-) (+) (+) (+) (+) (-) 12/31/11 Alaska 8,838 -1 928 206 36 221 4 0 3 327 9,424 Lower 48 States 295,787 1,732 52,673 53,267 43,150 46,020 45,905 947 1,224 23,228 324,643 Alabama 2,629 -49 455 157 573 383 3 2 0 218 2,475 Arkansas 14,178 728 631 324 6,760 6,880 2,093 0 23 1,079 16,370 California 2,647 923 1,486 1,889 47 52 73 0 0 311 2,934 Coastal Region Onshore 173 13 20 31 0 0 1 0 0 11 165 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 87 7 11 4 0 2 0 0 0 6 97 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 2,321 902 1,444 1,854 45 42 69 0 0 289 2,590 State Offshore

248

Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2,669 16,713 33,802 33,035 36,571 53,473 1977-2011 2,669 16,713 33,802 33,035 36,571 53,473 1977-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 2,798 1,864 2,017 1,871 2,242 2,993 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 22 10 87 7 10 21 1977-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 2,201 1,429 1,312 1,417 1,771 2,260 1981-2011 Texas 575 425 618 447 461 712 1981-2011 Alaska 376 112 4,068 108 452 206 1977-2011 Lower 48 States 22,293 16,601 29,734 32,927 36,119 53,267 1977-2011 Alabama 208 35 732 328 173 157 1977-2011 Arkansas 113 146 189 621 301 324 1977-2011 California 419 273 491 189 451 1,889 1977-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 12 26 69 14 16 31 1977-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 29 16 66 24 5 4 1977-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 371 217 327 148 427 1,854 1977-2011 State Offshore

249

Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases, Wet After Lease Separation  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1,640 33,404 31,941 32,664 42,394 56,015 1979-2011 1,640 33,404 31,941 32,664 42,394 56,015 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 2,084 1,862 1,740 2,365 3,082 2,567 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 43 48 23 79 23 39 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 1,658 1,477 1,269 1,690 2,721 2,150 1981-2011 Texas 383 337 448 596 338 378 1981-2011 Alaska 2,882 2,168 186 1,887 628 938 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 18,758 31,236 31,755 30,777 41,766 55,077 1979-2011 Alabama 238 165 288 101 214 472 1979-2011 Arkansas 101 321 1,250 1,912 1,072 631 1979-2011 California 163 372 277 274 575 1,542 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 29 33 21 42 39 21 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 7 16 1 38 9 12 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 118 311 253 191 514 1,498 1979-2011 State Offshore

250

Natural Gas Liquids Reserves Adjustments  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

-338 273 -89 173 -139 76 1979-2008 -338 273 -89 173 -139 76 1979-2008 Federal Offshore U.S. -101 119 26 47 -7 -29 1981-2008 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 1 0 1 1979-2008 Louisiana & Alabama -93 118 29 44 -3 -32 1981-2008 Texas -8 1 -3 2 -4 2 1981-2008 Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Lower 48 States -338 273 -89 173 -139 76 1979-2008 Alabama -2 -5 0 9 -13 76 1979-2008 Arkansas -1 0 0 2 -2 -1 1979-2008 California 11 9 -6 8 0 5 1979-2008 Coastal Region Onshore 1 1 -3 5 -7 1 1979-2008 Los Angeles Basin Onshore -1 0 0 0 1 2 1979-2008 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 11 8 -3 3 6 2 1979-2008 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Colorado -38 55 -19 -14 -23 120 1979-2008 Florida 4 -5 -5 -2 -2 -1 1979-2008 Kansas 3 32 -25 8 -9 5 1979-2008

251

Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

2,669 16,713 33,802 33,035 36,571 53,473 1977-2011 2,669 16,713 33,802 33,035 36,571 53,473 1977-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 2,798 1,864 2,017 1,871 2,242 2,993 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 22 10 87 7 10 21 1977-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 2,201 1,429 1,312 1,417 1,771 2,260 1981-2011 Texas 575 425 618 447 461 712 1981-2011 Alaska 376 112 4,068 108 452 206 1977-2011 Lower 48 States 22,293 16,601 29,734 32,927 36,119 53,267 1977-2011 Alabama 208 35 732 328 173 157 1977-2011 Arkansas 113 146 189 621 301 324 1977-2011 California 419 273 491 189 451 1,889 1977-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 12 26 69 14 16 31 1977-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 29 16 66 24 5 4 1977-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 371 217 327 148 427 1,854 1977-2011 State Offshore

252

Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas Estimated Production, Wet After Lease  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

2,281 2,296 2,349 2,556 2,445 2,722 1979-2011 2,281 2,296 2,349 2,556 2,445 2,722 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 635 625 563 659 564 514 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 35 39 35 36 28 31 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 462 507 436 522 468 415 1981-2011 Texas 138 79 92 101 68 68 1981-2011 Alaska 218 227 207 225 174 176 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 2,063 2,069 2,142 2,331 2,271 2,546 1979-2011 Alabama 4 4 3 5 6 8 1979-2011 Arkansas 5 4 3 4 4 6 1979-2011 California 180 163 163 171 186 260 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 9 12 11 12 12 12 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 8 8 7 7 6 7 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 157 139 143 148 164 237 1979-2011 State Offshore 6 4 2 4 4 4 1979-2011 Colorado 96 104 125 134 126 160 1979-2011

253

Natural Gas Liquids Reserves Acquisitions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

33 554 596 1,048 771 332 2000-2008 33 554 596 1,048 771 332 2000-2008 Federal Offshore U.S. 61 68 41 97 45 26 2000-2008 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2008 Louisiana & Alabama 58 66 37 72 44 25 2000-2008 Texas 3 2 4 25 1 1 2000-2008 Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2008 Lower 48 States 433 554 596 1,048 771 332 2000-2008 Alabama 4 0 28 5 16 1 2000-2008 Arkansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2008 California 2 7 10 18 10 1 2000-2008 Coastal Region Onshore 0 1 0 6 0 0 2000-2008 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 1 0 1 5 0 0 2000-2008 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 1 6 9 7 10 1 2000-2008 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2008 Colorado 13 69 49 62 10 40 2000-2008 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2008 Kansas 12 11 3 1 3 1 2000-2008 Kentucky 0 0 0 26 0 0 2000-2008

254

Natural Gas Liquids New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

72 54 42 53 58 68 1979-2008 72 54 42 53 58 68 1979-2008 Federal Offshore U.S. 37 32 21 19 16 18 1981-2008 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Louisiana & Alabama 32 31 19 18 16 17 1981-2008 Texas 5 1 2 1 0 1 1981-2008 Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Lower 48 States 72 54 42 53 58 68 1979-2008 Alabama 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Arkansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 California 0 0 0 0 0 1 1979-2008 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 1 1979-2008 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Colorado 0 0 0 1 0 0 1979-2008 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Kansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Kentucky 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Louisiana 16 6 12 14 10 31 1981-2008

255

Natural Gas Liquids New Field Discoveries  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

35 26 32 16 30 65 1979-2008 35 26 32 16 30 65 1979-2008 Federal Offshore U.S. 25 7 21 6 24 22 1981-2008 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Louisiana & Alabama 25 7 21 6 13 22 1981-2008 Texas 0 0 0 0 11 0 1981-2008 Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Lower 48 States 35 26 32 16 30 65 1979-2008 Alabama 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Arkansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 California 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Colorado 0 4 1 0 0 0 1979-2008 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Kansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Kentucky 0 0 1 0 0 0 1979-2008 Louisiana 0 0 0 1 0 3 1981-2008

256

Nonassociated Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions, Wet After Lease Separation  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

5,122 14,620 7,910 3,477 10,879 45,989 2000-2011 5,122 14,620 7,910 3,477 10,879 45,989 2000-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 2,264 987 558 165 784 418 2000-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 1,150 804 481 152 594 355 2000-2011 Texas 1,114 183 77 13 190 63 2000-2011 Alaska 0 5 0 0 0 171 2000-2011 Lower 48 States 25,122 14,615 7,910 3,477 10,879 45,818 2000-2011 Alabama 259 385 20 0 153 378 2000-2011 Arkansas 5 280 5 36 807 6,882 2000-2011 California 47 234 23 25 0 44 2000-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 47 234 23 25 0 44 2000-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2011 Colorado 1,009 448 1,382 446 81 1,278 2000-2011

257

Natural Gas Liquids Estimated Production  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

802 827 788 811 831 840 1979-2008 802 827 788 811 831 840 1979-2008 Federal Offshore U.S. 148 155 123 125 127 94 1981-2008 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Louisiana & Alabama 120 127 98 102 108 80 1981-2008 Texas 28 28 25 23 19 14 1981-2008 Alaska 18 18 17 14 13 13 1979-2008 Lower 48 States 784 809 771 797 818 827 1979-2008 Alabama 5 4 5 5 4 9 1979-2008 Arkansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 California 10 10 11 11 11 11 1979-2008 Coastal Region Onshore 1 1 1 1 1 1 1979-2008 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 9 9 10 10 10 10 1979-2008 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Colorado 29 32 31 32 33 45 1979-2008 Florida 1 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Kansas 23 22 20 19 19 19 1979-2008

258

Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions, Wet After Lease  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

960 1,350 938 678 2,469 1,884 2000-2011 960 1,350 938 678 2,469 1,884 2000-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 360 231 74 21 250 56 2000-2011 Pacific (California) 0 3 0 0 0 0 2000-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 234 219 68 12 222 49 2000-2011 Texas 126 9 6 9 28 7 2000-2011 Alaska 0 1 0 0 0 51 2000-2011 Lower 48 States 1,960 1,349 938 678 2,469 1,833 2000-2011 Alabama 0 1 1 0 0 20 2000-2011 Arkansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2011 California 219 9 8 58 0 11 2000-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 60 6 6 0 0 0 2000-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 41 0 1 0 0 3 2000-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 118 3 1 58 0 0 2000-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 8 2000-2011 Colorado 579 15 14 10 160 5 2000-2011 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2011 Kansas 0 0 0 0 3 1 2000-2011

259

Natural Gas Liquids Reserves Sales  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

03 442 440 931 670 282 2000-2008 03 442 440 931 670 282 2000-2008 Federal Offshore U.S. 84 59 35 104 41 27 2000-2008 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2008 Louisiana & Alabama 77 57 34 84 40 27 2000-2008 Texas 7 2 1 20 1 0 2000-2008 Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2008 Lower 48 States 403 442 440 931 670 282 2000-2008 Alabama 4 5 14 17 4 0 2000-2008 Arkansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2008 California 2 5 8 17 7 0 2000-2008 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 7 0 0 2000-2008 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 1 0 0 2 0 0 2000-2008 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 1 5 8 8 7 0 2000-2008 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2008 Colorado 10 71 33 70 22 21 2000-2008 Florida 0 0 0 0 1 0 2000-2008 Kansas 12 8 2 1 3 1 2000-2008 Kentucky 0 0 0 21 0 0 2000-2008

260

Natural Gas Liquids New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

72 54 42 53 58 68 1979-2008 72 54 42 53 58 68 1979-2008 Federal Offshore U.S. 37 32 21 19 16 18 1981-2008 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Louisiana & Alabama 32 31 19 18 16 17 1981-2008 Texas 5 1 2 1 0 1 1981-2008 Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Lower 48 States 72 54 42 53 58 68 1979-2008 Alabama 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Arkansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 California 0 0 0 0 0 1 1979-2008 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 1 1979-2008 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Colorado 0 0 0 1 0 0 1979-2008 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Kansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Kentucky 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Louisiana 16 6 12 14 10 31 1981-2008

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "joaquin basin onshore" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas Reserves Extensions, Wet After Lease  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

810 1,098 1,488 2,669 2,660 5,957 1979-2011 810 1,098 1,488 2,669 2,660 5,957 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 61 136 287 90 87 32 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 60 133 280 90 54 32 1981-2011 Texas 1 3 7 0 33 0 1981-2011 Alaska 4 6 0 0 2 3 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 806 1,092 1,488 2,669 2,658 5,954 1979-2011 Alabama 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Arkansas 0 0 0 0 4 0 1979-2011 California 21 4 100 470 12 74 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 5 0 0 0 0 1 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 4 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 11 1 95 468 9 70 1979-2011 State Offshore 1 3 5 2 3 3 1979-2011 Colorado 113 180 127 165 318 506 1979-2011 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Kansas 1 6 6 1 3 53 1979-2011

262

Lease Condensate Production  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Condensate Production Condensate Production (Million Barrels) Period: Annual Download Series History Download Series History Definitions, Sources & Notes Definitions, Sources & Notes 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 View History U.S. 182 181 173 178 224 231 1979-2011 Alabama 2 2 2 2 2 2 1979-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 20 1979-2011 Arkansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 California 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Colorado 6 6 7 7 7 8 1979-2011 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Kansas 1 1 1 1 2 1 1979-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Louisiana 22 20 20 18 14 14 1981-2011

263

Nonassociated Natural Gas Reserves Sales, Wet After Lease Separation  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

2,178 14,403 7,249 3,813 9,436 43,237 2000-2011 2,178 14,403 7,249 3,813 9,436 43,237 2000-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 2,317 763 672 142 827 266 2000-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 1,261 674 587 108 697 243 2000-2011 Texas 1,056 89 85 34 130 23 2000-2011 Alaska 0 8 0 4 132 34 2000-2011 Lower 48 States 22,178 14,395 7,249 3,809 9,304 43,203 2000-2011 Alabama 188 303 11 2 270 586 2000-2011 Arkansas 4 298 19 49 393 6,724 2000-2011 California 154 165 1 0 2 48 2000-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 2 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 152 165 1 0 2 47 2000-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 1 2000-2011 Colorado 1,009 769 774 382 253 1,292 2000-2011

264

Table 12. Nonassociated natural gas proved reserves, reserves changes, and production, wet after lease separation, 2011  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

: Nonassociated natural gas proved reserves, reserves changes, and production, wet after lease separation, 2011 : Nonassociated natural gas proved reserves, reserves changes, and production, wet after lease separation, 2011 billion cubic feet Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries Estimated Proved Reserves Adjustments Increases Decreases SalesAcquisitions Extensions Discoveries in Old Fields Production Reserves State and Subdivision 12/31/10 (+,-) (+) (-) (-) (+) (+) (+) (+) (-) 12/31/11 Alaska 1,021 -1 95 128 34 171 1 0 3 152 976 Lower 48 States 280,880 2,326 47,832 50,046 43,203 45,818 41,677 376 1,097 21,747 305,010 Alabama 2,686 -48 470 163 586 378 3 0 0 218 2,522 Arkansas 14,152 705 581 311 6,724 6,882 2,094 0 23 1,074 16,328 California 503 -12 118 32 48 44 1 0 0 64 510 Coastal Region Onshore 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 498 -12 116 31 47 44 1 0 0 63 506 State Offshore

265

Dry Natural Gas New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1,155 1,188 1,622 2,598 1,668 1,227 1977-2011 1,155 1,188 1,622 2,598 1,668 1,227 1977-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 410 368 532 300 237 76 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 1 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 343 330 379 223 213 76 1981-2011 Texas 66 38 153 77 24 0 1981-2011 Alaska 2 0 5 0 0 3 1977-2011 Lower 48 States 1,153 1,188 1,617 2,598 1,668 1,224 1977-2011 Alabama 7 17 1 0 0 0 1977-2011 Arkansas 32 27 41 36 27 23 1977-2011 California 4 1 14 0 0 0 1977-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 1 1 14 0 0 0 1977-2011 State Offshore 3 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 Colorado 26 23 17 0 27 0 1977-2011 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 Kansas 3 0 2 0 1 1 1977-2011

266

Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases, Wet After  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

2,782 1,804 7,385 2,698 3,964 5,953 1979-2011 2,782 1,804 7,385 2,698 3,964 5,953 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 984 351 430 517 879 1,393 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 22 10 38 7 5 18 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 827 304 282 442 841 1,152 1981-2011 Texas 135 37 110 68 33 223 1981-2011 Alaska 111 10 3,954 5 260 79 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 2,671 1,794 3,431 2,693 3,704 5,874 1979-2011 Alabama 8 1 0 1 4 0 1979-2011 Arkansas 2 7 28 0 0 13 1979-2011 California 391 102 388 139 389 1,927 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 12 22 72 14 17 31 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 31 17 71 25 5 4 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 341 49 217 97 367 1,892 1979-2011 State Offshore 7 14 28 3 0 0 1979-2011 Colorado 35 14 50 185 71 269 1979-2011

267

Nonassociated Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases, Wet After Lease  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

6,268 28,004 28,998 27,142 37,411 47,927 1979-2011 6,268 28,004 28,998 27,142 37,411 47,927 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 1,559 1,240 1,131 1,511 2,054 984 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 8 0 0 8 0 0 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 1,274 963 886 997 1,814 740 1981-2011 Texas 277 277 245 506 240 244 1981-2011 Alaska 32 70 149 191 392 95 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 16,236 27,934 28,849 26,951 37,019 47,832 1979-2011 Alabama 234 153 287 90 208 470 1979-2011 Arkansas 99 310 1,247 1,907 1,060 581 1979-2011 California 67 80 113 97 50 118 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 0 1 0 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 65 80 111 96 47 116 1979-2011 State Offshore 2 0 2 1 2 2 1979-2011 Colorado 981 3,823 3,154 1,661 2,985 2,522 1979-2011

268

Dry Natural Gas New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1,155 1,188 1,622 2,598 1,668 1,227 1977-2011 1,155 1,188 1,622 2,598 1,668 1,227 1977-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 410 368 532 300 237 76 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 1 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 343 330 379 223 213 76 1981-2011 Texas 66 38 153 77 24 0 1981-2011 Alaska 2 0 5 0 0 3 1977-2011 Lower 48 States 1,153 1,188 1,617 2,598 1,668 1,224 1977-2011 Alabama 7 17 1 0 0 0 1977-2011 Arkansas 32 27 41 36 27 23 1977-2011 California 4 1 14 0 0 0 1977-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 1 1 14 0 0 0 1977-2011 State Offshore 3 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 Colorado 26 23 17 0 27 0 1977-2011 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 Kansas 3 0 2 0 1 1 1977-2011

269

Nonassociated Natural Gas New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields, Wet  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1,132 1,171 858 2,487 1,515 1,100 1979-2011 1,132 1,171 858 2,487 1,515 1,100 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 388 325 248 186 95 38 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 329 294 169 150 83 38 1981-2011 Texas 59 31 79 36 12 0 1981-2011 Alaska 2 0 5 0 0 3 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 1,130 1,171 853 2,487 1,515 1,097 1979-2011 Alabama 7 17 1 0 0 0 1979-2011 Arkansas 33 27 41 36 27 23 1979-2011 California 4 1 7 0 0 0 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 1 1 7 0 0 0 1979-2011 State Offshore 3 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Colorado 27 24 17 0 29 0 1979-2011 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Kansas 3 0 2 0 1 1 1979-2011

270

Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

21,778 27,107 26,687 42,139 44,783 45,909 1977-2011 21,778 27,107 26,687 42,139 44,783 45,909 1977-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 733 657 903 289 326 94 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 530 525 610 270 186 81 1981-2011 Texas 203 132 293 19 140 13 1981-2011 Alaska 49 28 18 2 14 4 1977-2011 Lower 48 States 21,729 27,079 26,669 42,137 44,769 45,905 1977-2011 Alabama 146 123 59 20 28 3 1977-2011 Arkansas 491 1,148 1,754 4,627 3,082 2,093 1977-2011 California 176 16 101 450 12 73 1977-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 5 0 0 0 0 1 1977-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 4 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 166 13 96 446 8 69 1977-2011 State Offshore 1 3 5 4 4 3 1977-2011 Colorado 1,980 2,812 2,294 3,346 2,838 2,015 1977-2011

271

Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas Reserves Sales, Wet After Lease Separation  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

726 1,115 662 564 1,146 1,338 2000-2011 726 1,115 662 564 1,146 1,338 2000-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 455 161 48 20 83 66 2000-2011 Pacific (California) 0 1 0 0 0 0 2000-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 320 156 48 20 74 66 2000-2011 Texas 135 4 0 0 9 0 2000-2011 Alaska 0 3 0 1 0 2 2000-2011 Lower 48 States 1,726 1,112 662 563 1,146 1,336 2000-2011 Alabama 4 5 0 0 2 9 2000-2011 Arkansas 0 0 0 5 0 38 2000-2011 California 133 8 7 4 1 1 2000-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 70 4 6 0 1 0 2000-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 37 0 1 0 0 0 2000-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 26 2 0 4 0 0 2000-2011 State Offshore 0 2 0 0 0 1 2000-2011 Colorado 578 3 1 9 2 19 2000-2011 Florida 0 48 0 0 0 0 2000-2011 Kansas 0 0 1 0 1 1 2000-2011 Kentucky

272

New Field Discoveries of Dry Natural Gas Reserves  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

409 796 1,170 1,372 850 947 1977-2011 409 796 1,170 1,372 850 947 1977-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 111 608 311 308 68 562 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 82 304 279 48 68 562 1981-2011 Texas 29 304 32 260 0 0 1981-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 Lower 48 States 409 796 1,170 1,372 850 947 1977-2011 Alabama 0 0 2 0 3 2 1977-2011 Arkansas 7 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 California 0 0 0 1 1 0 1977-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 1 1 0 1977-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 Colorado 14 15 17 8 22 18 1977-2011 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 Kansas 0 0 9 0 4 0 1977-2011 Kentucky

273

Dry Natural Gas Reserves Estimated Production  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

8,545 19,466 20,523 21,594 22,239 23,555 1977-2011 8,545 19,466 20,523 21,594 22,239 23,555 1977-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 2,775 2,731 2,250 2,377 2,154 1,660 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 37 40 36 37 28 31 1977-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 1,973 2,066 1,752 1,886 1,717 1,311 1981-2011 Texas 765 625 462 454 409 318 1981-2011 Alaska 408 388 354 358 317 327 1977-2011 Lower 48 States 18,137 19,078 20,169 21,236 21,922 23,228 1977-2011 Alabama 287 274 257 254 223 218 1977-2011 Arkansas 188 269 456 698 951 1,079 1977-2011 California 255 253 237 239 243 311 1977-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 9 12 11 12 12 11 1977-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 8 8 6 7 6 6 1977-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 232 227 217 214 220 289 1977-2011 State Offshore 6 6 3 6 5 5 1977-2011

274

Table 8. Lease condensate proved reserves , reserves changes, and prodction, 2011  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Lease condensate proved reserves, reserves changes, and production, 2011 Lease condensate proved reserves, reserves changes, and production, 2011 million barrels Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries Estimated Proved Reserves Adjustments Increases Decreases Sales Acquisitions Extensions Discoveries in Old Fields Production Reserves State and Subdivision 12/31/10 (+,-) (+) (-) (-) (+) (+) (+) (+) (-) 12/31/11 Alaska 0 1 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 36 Lower 48 States 1,914 7 486 452 216 273 536 4 29 211 2,370 Alabama 18 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 Arkansas 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 California 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 State Offshore 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Colorado 115 -1 34 8 10 3 7 0 0 8 132 Florida 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Kansas 7 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 Kentucky 1 1 4 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 5 Louisiana 106 -6 30 14 20 17 7 1 1 14 108 North 27 -1 12 2 7 7 0 0 0 3 33

275

Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

0,833 32,174 30,674 31,416 40,521 53,601 1977-2011 0,833 32,174 30,674 31,416 40,521 53,601 1977-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 2,030 1,815 1,699 2,312 2,978 2,467 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 43 49 23 79 23 39 1977-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 1,606 1,430 1,230 1,637 2,617 2,050 1981-2011 Texas 381 336 446 596 338 378 1981-2011 Alaska 2,853 2,147 184 1,868 622 928 1977-2011 Lower 48 States 17,980 30,027 30,490 29,548 39,899 52,673 1977-2011 Alabama 234 163 283 99 206 455 1977-2011 Arkansas 101 321 1,249 1,912 1,072 631 1977-2011 California 156 355 263 259 548 1,486 1977-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 28 32 21 41 38 20 1977-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 7 15 1 35 9 11 1977-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 112 296 239 180 488 1,444 1977-2011 State Offshore

276

Nonassociated Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases, Wet After Lease  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

20,957 15,664 27,810 31,865 34,375 50,174 1979-2011 20,957 15,664 27,810 31,865 34,375 50,174 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 1,887 1,561 1,631 1,400 1,433 1,711 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 48 0 5 3 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 1,445 1,172 1,073 1,021 1,000 1,219 1981-2011 Texas 442 389 510 379 428 489 1981-2011 Alaska 267 103 153 103 195 128 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 20,690 15,561 27,657 31,762 34,180 50,046 1979-2011 Alabama 205 35 747 336 176 163 1979-2011 Arkansas 112 139 161 621 301 311 1979-2011 California 49 186 129 60 87 32 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 5 0 1 0 1 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 49 180 128 59 84 31 1979-2011 State Offshore 0 1 1 0 3 0 1979-2011

277

Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases, Wet After Lease Separation  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

3,739 17,468 35,195 34,563 38,339 56,127 1979-2011 3,739 17,468 35,195 34,563 38,339 56,127 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 2,871 1,912 2,061 1,917 2,312 3,104 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 22 10 86 7 10 21 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 2,272 1,476 1,355 1,463 1,841 2,371 1981-2011 Texas 577 426 620 447 461 712 1981-2011 Alaska 378 113 4,107 108 455 207 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 23,361 17,355 31,088 34,455 37,884 55,920 1979-2011 Alabama 213 36 747 337 180 163 1979-2011 Arkansas 114 146 189 621 301 324 1979-2011 California 440 288 517 199 476 1,959 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 12 27 72 15 17 32 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 31 17 71 25 5 4 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 390 229 345 156 451 1,923 1979-2011 State Offshore

278

Natural Gas Liquids Reserves Revision Increases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

882 1,232 968 845 1,187 1,192 1979-2008 882 1,232 968 845 1,187 1,192 1979-2008 Federal Offshore U.S. 118 148 114 118 116 85 1981-2008 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Louisiana & Alabama 89 104 89 99 90 71 1981-2008 Texas 29 44 25 19 26 14 1981-2008 Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Lower 48 States 882 1,232 968 845 1,187 1,192 1979-2008 Alabama 8 4 2 5 2 9 1979-2008 Arkansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 California 12 22 31 8 16 12 1979-2008 Coastal Region Onshore 1 3 2 3 2 1 1979-2008 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 1 0 1 0 1 0 1979-2008 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 10 19 28 5 13 11 1979-2008 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Colorado 51 72 55 34 105 93 1979-2008 Florida 0 0 0 0 2 0 1979-2008 Kansas 11 44 12 44 22 19 1979-2008

279

Natural Gas Reserves Extensions, Wet After Lease Separation  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

22,834 28,255 27,800 43,500 46,283 47,635 1979-2011 22,834 28,255 27,800 43,500 46,283 47,635 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 751 675 924 298 333 98 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 547 543 630 279 193 85 1981-2011 Texas 204 132 294 19 140 13 1981-2011 Alaska 50 28 18 2 15 4 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 22,784 28,227 27,782 43,498 46,268 47,631 1979-2011 Alabama 150 125 61 21 29 3 1979-2011 Arkansas 492 1,149 1,755 4,629 3,083 2,094 1979-2011 California 186 18 107 476 13 75 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 5 0 0 0 0 1 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 4 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 176 14 102 472 9 71 1979-2011 State Offshore 1 4 5 4 4 3 1979-2011 Colorado 2,042 2,893 2,379 3,495 2,986 2,123 1979-2011

280

Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

0,833 32,174 30,674 31,416 40,521 53,601 1977-2011 0,833 32,174 30,674 31,416 40,521 53,601 1977-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 2,030 1,815 1,699 2,312 2,978 2,467 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 43 49 23 79 23 39 1977-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 1,606 1,430 1,230 1,637 2,617 2,050 1981-2011 Texas 381 336 446 596 338 378 1981-2011 Alaska 2,853 2,147 184 1,868 622 928 1977-2011 Lower 48 States 17,980 30,027 30,490 29,548 39,899 52,673 1977-2011 Alabama 234 163 283 99 206 455 1977-2011 Arkansas 101 321 1,249 1,912 1,072 631 1977-2011 California 156 355 263 259 548 1,486 1977-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 28 32 21 41 38 20 1977-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 7 15 1 35 9 11 1977-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 112 296 239 180 488 1,444 1977-2011 State Offshore

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "joaquin basin onshore" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

New Field Discoveries of Dry Natural Gas Reserves  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

409 796 1,170 1,372 850 947 1977-2011 409 796 1,170 1,372 850 947 1977-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 111 608 311 308 68 562 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 82 304 279 48 68 562 1981-2011 Texas 29 304 32 260 0 0 1981-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 Lower 48 States 409 796 1,170 1,372 850 947 1977-2011 Alabama 0 0 2 0 3 2 1977-2011 Arkansas 7 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 California 0 0 0 1 1 0 1977-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 1 1 0 1977-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 Colorado 14 15 17 8 22 18 1977-2011 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011 Kansas 0 0 9 0 4 0 1977-2011 Kentucky

282

NILE BASIN INITIATIVE Claire Stodola  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

· Climate Change #12;Upstream states · Low water needs Downstream states · High water needs #12;Historical #12;Research Question How has the Nile Basin Initiative influenced the riparian states' management states 1959 ­ Still only BILATERAL 1960s to 1990s - Increasing frustration by upstream states #12;What

New Hampshire, University of

283

Tropical forests: Include Congo basin  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... 478, 378381; 2011). But their meta-analysis of 138 studies overlooks the Congo basin, the second-largest continuous area of rainforest in the world; moreover, only ... the lack of recent and accessible legacy data for this region. The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), which contains 98 million hectares of rainforest (60% of the ...

Hans Verbeeck; Pascal Boeckx; Kathy Steppe

2011-11-09T23:59:59.000Z

284

GOLF COURSES FRASER RIVER BASIN  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

practices (BMP's) for golf courses, entitled Greening your BC Golf Course. A Guide to Environmental. It also summarizes conditions and practices in the Fraser Basin, reviews best management practices.C. Prepared by: UMA ENVIRONMENTAL A Division of UMA Engineering Ltd. Burnaby, B.C. March 1996 #12;THIRD PARTY

285

Providing for adjustments of royalty payments under certain Federal onshore and Indian oil and gas leases, and for other purposes. House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress, First Session, October 15, 1987  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The House report on H.R. 3479 adjusting royalty payments on oil and gas leases recommends passage with certain amendments. The recommended title for the Act is The Notice to Lessees No. 5 (NTL-5) Gas Royalty Act of 1987. The Act addresses problems involving some onshore and Indian leases, and redefines the procedures for determining the value of the lease. The report summarizes the purpose and need for the legislation, analyzes it by section, and concludes with communications between the committee and the Interior Department. A minority view argues in favor of placing the highest possible value on leases in order to be fair to taxpayers.

Not Available

1987-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

286

THE ADVANCED CHEMISTRY BASINS PROJECT  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In the next decades, oil exploration by majors and independents will increasingly be in remote, inaccessible areas, or in areas where there has been extensive shallow exploration but deeper exploration potential may remain; areas where the collection of data is expensive, difficult, or even impossible, and where the most efficient use of existing data can drive the economics of the target. The ability to read hydrocarbon chemistry in terms of subsurface migration processes by relating it to the evolution of the basin and fluid migration is perhaps the single technological capability that could most improve our ability to explore effectively because it would allow us to use a vast store of existing or easily collected chemical data to determine the major migration pathways in a basin and to determine if there is deep exploration potential. To this end a the DOE funded a joint effort between California Institute of Technology, Cornell University, and GeoGroup Inc. to assemble a representative set of maturity and maturation kinetic models and develop an advanced basin model able to predict the chemistry of hydrocarbons in a basin from this input data. The four year project is now completed and has produced set of public domain maturity indicator and maturation kinetic data set, an oil chemistry and flash calculation tool operable under Excel, and a user friendly, graphically intuitive basin model that uses this data and flash tool, operates on a PC, and simulates hydrocarbon generation and migration and the chemical changes that can occur during migration (such as phase separation and gas washing). The DOE Advanced Chemistry Basin Model includes a number of new methods that represent advances over current technology. The model is built around the concept of handling arbitrarily detailed chemical composition of fluids in a robust finite-element 2-D grid. There are three themes on which the model focuses: chemical kinetic and equilibrium reaction parameters, chemical phase equilibrium, and physical flow through porous media. The chemical kinetic scheme includes thermal indicators including vitrinite, sterane ratios, hopane ratios, and diamonoids; and a user-modifiable reaction network for primary and secondary maturation. Also provided is a database of type-specific kerogen maturation schemes. The phase equilibrium scheme includes modules for primary and secondary migration, multi-phase equilibrium (flash) calculations, and viscosity predictions.

William Goddard; Peter Meulbroek; Yongchun Tang; Lawrence Cathles III

2004-04-05T23:59:59.000Z

287

Geology of interior cratonic sag basins  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Interior cratonic sag basins are thick accumulations of sediment, generally more or less oval in shape, located entirely in the interiors of continental masses. Some are single-cycle basins and others are characterized by repeated sag cycles or are complex polyhistory basins. Many appear to have developed over ancient rift systems. Interior cratonic sag basins are typified by a dominance of flexural over fault-controlled subsidence, and a low ratio of sediment volume to surface area of the basin. The Baltic, Carpentaria, Illinois, Michigan, Parana, Paris, and Williston basins are examples of interior cratonic sag basins. Tectonics played a dominant role in controlling the shapes and the geometries of the juxtaposed packets of sedimentary sequences. While the mechanics of tectonic control are not clear, evidence suggests that the movements are apparently related to convergence of lithospheric plates and collision and breakup of continents. Whatever the cause, tectonic movements controlled the freeboard of continents, altering base level and initiating new tectono-sedimentologic regimes. Sag basins situated in low latitudes during their development commonly were sites of thick carbonates (e.g., Illinois, Michigan, Williston, and Paris basins). In contrast, siliciclastic sedimentation characterized basins that formed in higher latitudes (e.g., Parana and Carpentaria basins). Highly productive sag basins are characterized by widespread, mature, organic-rich source rocks, large structures, and good seals. Nonproductive basins have one or more of the following characteristics: immature source rocks, leaky plumbing, freshwater flushing, and/or complex geology due to numerous intrusions that inhibit mapping of plays.

Leighton, M.W.; Eidel, J.J.; Kolata, D.R.; Oltz, D.F. (Illinois Geological Survey, Champaign (USA))

1990-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

288

Results of analyses of fur samples from the San Joaquin Kit Fox and associated soil and water samples from the Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 1, Tupman, California  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this study was to determine whether analysis of the elemental content of fur from San Joaquin kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis mutica) and of water and soil from kit fox habitats could be used to make inferences concerning the cause of an observed decline in the kit fox population on Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 1 (NPR-1). Fur samples that had been collected previously from NPR-1, another oil field (NPR-2), and two sites with no oil development were subjected to neutron activation analysis. In addition, soil samples were collected from the home ranges of individual foxes from undisturbed portions of major soil types on NPR-1 and from wastewater samples were collected from tanks and sumps and subjected to neutron activation analysis. Most elemental concentrations in fur were highest at Camp Roberts and lowest on the undeveloped portions of NPR-I. Fur concentrations were intermediate on the developed oil fields but were correlated with percent disturbance and with number of wells on NPR-1 and NPR-2. The fact that most elements covaried across the range of sites suggests that some pervasive source such as soil was responsible. However, fur concentrations were not correlated with soft concentrations. The kit foxes on the developed portion of NPR-1 did not have concentrations of elements in fur relative to other sites that would account for the population decline in the early 1980s. The oil-related elements As, Ba, and V were elevated in fox fur from oil fields, but only As was sufficiently elevated to suggest a risk of toxicity in individual foxes. However, arsenic concentrations suggestive of sublethal toxicity were found in only 0.56% of foxes from developed oil fields, too few to account for a population decline.

Suter, G.W. II; Rosen, A.E.; Beauchamp, J.J. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States); Kato, T.T. [EG and G Energy Measurements, Inc., Tupman, CA (United States)

1992-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

289

Environment of deposition of the Yowlumne sandstone: internal morphology and rock properties, Kern County, California  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, and the San Joaquin basin, an oil and gas province, to the south (Dorman, 1980). This thesis follows the style and format of the American Association of Petroleum Geolo ists Bulletin. The San Joaquin basin is bounded by the Sierra Nevada Range on the east... the basin sufficiently to permit the deposition of the Pliocene Etchegoin Formation in shallow marine water (Metz and Whitworth, 1983). Drilling History The San Joaquin Basin has long been recognized as an oil and gas producing province. Approximately...

Royo, Gilberto Rafael

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

290

THE INTRACONTINENTAL BASINS (ICONS) ATLAS APPLICATIONS IN EASTERN AUSTRALIA PESA Eastern Australasian Basins Symposium III Sydney, 1417 September, 2008 275  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

THE INTRACONTINENTAL BASINS (ICONS) ATLAS ­ APPLICATIONS IN EASTERN AUSTRALIA PESA Eastern Australasian Basins Symposium III Sydney, 14­17 September, 2008 275 The IntraCONtinental basinS (ICONS) atlas of intracontinental basins (ICONS atlas), using freely available global and regional datasets. Firstly, we are trying

Müller, Dietmar

291

CD-1: Intracratonic Basin | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

thermal conductivity of salt rock, and might provide suitable geothermal reservoirs for district heating.4 Formations encountered in deeper parts of an intracratonic basin...

292

Hack's law of debris-flow basins  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Hack's law was originally derived from basin statistics for varied spatial scales and regions. The exponent value of the law has been shown to vary between 0.47 and 0.70, causing uncertainty in its application. This paper focuses on the emergence of Hack's law from debris-flow basins in China. Over 5,000 debris-flow basins in different regions of China with drainage areas less than 100km2 are included in this study. Basins in the different regions are found to present similar distributions. Hack's law is derived from maximum probability and conditional distributions, suggesting that the law should describe some critical state of basin evolution. Results suggest the exponent value is approximately 0.5. Further analysis indicates that Hack's law is related to other scaling laws underlying the evolution of a basin and that the exponent is not dependent on basin shape but rather on the evolutionary stage. A case study of a well known debris-flow basin further confirms Hack's law and its implications in basin evolution.

Yong LI; Z.Q. YUE; C.F. LEE; R.E. BEIGHLEY; Xiao-Qing CHEN; Kai-Heng HU; Peng CUI

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

293

NMOSE Basin Guidelines | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

OtherOther: NMOSE Basin GuidelinesLegal Abstract The New Mexico Office of the State Engineer (NMOSE) provides links to final rules and administrative guidelines for particular...

294

Crustal structure across the Colorado Basin, offshore Argentina  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......Uliana 1989). Northeastern Argentina formed in this period an interior...undisturbed. The seismic energy was sufficient to trace signals...the Macachin Graben onshore Argentina (Fig. 1). The latter is...Mancilla from REPSOL/YPF, Argentina. We are grateful to Karl......

Dieter Franke; Soenke Neben; Bernd Schreckenberger; Albrecht Schulze; Manfred Stiller; Charlotte M. Krawczyk

2006-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

295

Transient hydrodynamics within intercratonic sedimentary basins during glacial cycles  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ka B.P.), such as the Williston, Michigan, and Illinois basins. We show that in such basins fluid of the Williston and Alberta basins. Under such con- ditions fluid fluxes in aquifers can be expected

Bense, Victor

296

CRAD, Engineering - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

System CRAD, Emergency Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System...

297

CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Office of River Protection K Basin...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Conduct of Operations - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System May 2004 A...

298

CRAD, Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CRAD, Emergency Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD,...

299

CRAD, Emergency Management - Office of River Protection K Basin...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Emergency Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD, Emergency Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System May 2004 A section...

300

Refraction Survey At Northern Basin & Range Region (Heimgartner...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Northern Basin & Range Region (Heimgartner, Et Al., 2005) Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Exploration Activity: Refraction Survey At Northern Basin &...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "joaquin basin onshore" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Geographic Information System At Northern Basin & Range Region...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Activity: Geographic Information System At Northern Basin & Range Region (Nash & Johnson, 2003) Exploration Activity Details Location Northern Basin and Range Geothermal...

302

Geographic Information System At Nw Basin & Range Region (Nash...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Geographic Information System At Nw Basin & Range Region (Nash & Johnson, 2003) Exploration Activity Details Location Northwest Basin and Range Geothermal Region Exploration...

303

Ecology: Drought in the Congo Basin  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... significantly expanded the tropical-forest research programme by focusing on chronic drought in Africa's Congo Basin, a region that has been the subject of much less investigation than the ... optical, microwave and gravity remote-sensing data to evaluate long-term drought response in the Congo Basin (Fig. 1). Annual precipitation in this region is bimodal, and the ...

Jeffrey Q. Chambers; Dar A. Roberts

2014-04-23T23:59:59.000Z

304

6, 839877, 2006 Mexico City basin  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

emitters of air pollutants leading to negative health effects and environmental degradation. The rate altitude basin with air pollutant concentrations above the health limits most days of the year. A mesoscale-dimensional wind patterns in25 the basin and found that the sea-breeze transports the polluted air mass up the moun

Boyer, Edmond

305

Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Program. Oversight hearing before the Subcommittee on Mining and Natural Resources of the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, House of Representatives, Ninety-Ninth Congress, First Session, May 7, 1985  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A hearing on the management of the Department of Interior's (DOI) Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Program examined the question of geology versus market forces in determining lease boundaries and lease offerings. At issue was the question of possible fraud and the loss of revenue to states when leases are sold over the counter or by lottery, as described by Senator Dale Bumpers of Arkansas and the Governor of Wyoming, and the potential environmental damage that could result from an accelerated federal leasing program. Representatives of DOI described leasing procedures and efforts to balance the need for orderly exploration while also meeting economic and environmental goals. The witnesses also included representatives of environmental groups, geologists, and the oil and gas industry. An appendix with additional correspondence, statements, and other material submitted for the record follows the testimony of the 13 witnesses.

Not Available

1986-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

306

Modelin the Transport and Chemical Evolution of Onshore and Offshore Emissions and Their Impact on Local and Regional Air Quality Using a Variable-Grid-Resolution Air Quality Model  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The overall objective of this research project was to develop an innovative modeling technique to adequately model the offshore/onshore transport of pollutants. The variable-grid modeling approach that was developed alleviates many of the shortcomings of the traditionally used nested regular-grid modeling approach, in particular related to biases near boundaries and the excessive computational requirements when using nested grids. The Gulf of Mexico region contiguous to the Houston-Galveston area and southern Louisiana was chosen as a test bed for the variable-grid modeling approach. In addition to the onshore high pollution emissions from various sources in those areas, emissions from on-shore and off-shore oil and gas exploration and production are additional sources of air pollution. We identified case studies for which to perform meteorological and air quality model simulations. Our approach included developing and evaluating the meteorological, emissions, and chemistry-transport modeling components for the variable-grid applications, with special focus on the geographic areas where the finest grid resolution was used. We evaluated the performance of two atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) schemes, and identified the best-performing scheme for simulating mesoscale circulations for different grid resolutions. Use of a newly developed surface data assimilation scheme resulted in improved meteorological model simulations. We also successfully ingested satellite-derived sea surface temperatures (SSTs) into the meteorological model simulations, leading to further improvements in simulated wind, temperature, and moisture fields. These improved meteorological fields were important for variable-grid simulations, especially related to capturing the land-sea breeze circulations that are critical for modeling offshore/onshore transport of pollutants in the Gulf region. We developed SMOKE-VGR, the variable-grid version of the SMOKE emissions processing model, and tested and evaluated this new system. We completed the development of our variable-grid-resolution air quality model (MAQSIP-VGR) and performed various diagnostic tests related to an enhanced cloud parameterization scheme. We also developed an important tool for variable-grid graphics using Google Earth. We ran the MAQSIP-VGR for the Houston-Galveston and southern Louisiana domains for an August 23 to September 2, 2002, episode. Results of the modeling simulations highlighted the usefulness of the variable-grid modeling approach when simulating complex terrain processes related to land and sea close to an urban area. Our results showed that realistic SST patterns based on remote sensing are critical to capturing the land-sea breeze, in particular the inland intrusion of the reversed mesoscale circulation that is critical for simulating air pollution over urban areas near coastal regions. Besides capturing the correct horizontal gradient between land and sea surface temperatures, it is important to use an adequate ABL scheme in order to quantify correctly the vertical profiles of various parameters. The ABL scheme should capture the dynamics of the marine boundary layer, which is not often considered in a typical simulation over land. Our results further showed the effect of using satellite-derived SSTs on the horizontal and vertical extent of the modeled pollution pattern, and the increase in hourly ozone concentrations associated with changes in ABL characteristics resulting from the enhanced mesoscale circulation in the lower troposphere.

Adel Hanna

2008-10-16T23:59:59.000Z

307

Play Analysis and Digital Portfolio of Major Oil Reservoirs in the Permian Basin: Application and Transfer of Advanced Geological and Engineering Technologies for Incremental Production Opportunities  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A play portfolio is being constructed for the Permian Basin in west Texas and southeast New Mexico, the largest onshore petroleum-producing basin in the United States. Approximately 1,300 reservoirs in the Permian Basin have been identified as having cumulative production greater than 1 MMbbl (1.59 x 10{sup 5} m{sup 3}) of oil through 2000. Of these significant-sized reservoirs, approximately 1,000 are in Texas and 300 in New Mexico. There are 32 geologic plays that have been defined for Permian Basin oil reservoirs, and each of the 1,300 major reservoirs was assigned to a play. The reservoirs were mapped and compiled in a Geographic Information System (GIS) by play. The final reservoir shapefile for each play contains the geographic location of each reservoir. Associated reservoir information within the linked data tables includes RRC reservoir number and district (Texas only), official field and reservoir name, year reservoir was discovered, depth to top of the reservoir, production in 2000, and cumulative production through 2000. Some tables also list subplays. Play boundaries were drawn for each play; the boundaries include areas where fields in that play occur but are smaller than 1 MMbbl (1.59 x 10{sup 5} m{sup 3}) of cumulative production. Oil production from the reservoirs in the Permian Basin having cumulative production of >1 MMbbl (1.59 x 10{sup 5} m{sup 3}) was 301.4 MMbbl (4.79 x 10{sup 7} m{sup 3}) in 2000. Cumulative Permian Basin production through 2000 was 28.9 Bbbl (4.59 x 10{sup 9} m{sup 3}). The top four plays in cumulative production are the Northwest Shelf San Andres Platform Carbonate play (3.97 Bbbl [6.31 x 10{sup 8} m{sup 3}]), the Leonard Restricted Platform Carbonate play (3.30 Bbbl [5.25 x 10{sup 8} m{sup 3}]), the Pennsylvanian and Lower Permian Horseshoe Atoll Carbonate play (2.70 Bbbl [4.29 x 10{sup 8} m{sup 3}]), and the San Andres Platform Carbonate play (2.15 Bbbl [3.42 x 10{sup 8} m{sup 3}]). Detailed studies of three reservoirs are in progress: Kelly-Snyder (SACROC unit) in the Pennsylvanian and Lower Permian Horseshoe Atoll Carbonate play, Fullerton in the Leonard Restricted Platform Carbonate play, and Barnhart (Ellenburger) in the Ellenburger Selectively Dolomitized Ramp Carbonate play. For each of these detailed reservoir studies, technologies for further, economically viable exploitation are being investigated.

Shirley P. Dutton; Eugene M. Kim; Ronald F. Broadhead; Caroline L. Breton; William D. Raatz; Stephen C. Ruppel; Charles Kerans

2004-01-13T23:59:59.000Z

308

Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

3,642 9,491 23,455 2009-2011 3,642 9,491 23,455 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 3,642 9,491 23,455 2009-2011 Alabama 2 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 261 126 141 2009-2011 California 0 2011-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 2011-2011 Colorado 0 2 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 3 43 11 2009-2011 Louisiana 826 1,878 3,882 2009-2011 North 826 1,878 3,882 2009-2011 Michigan 276 325 151 2009-2011 Montana 34 16 14 2009-2011 New Mexico 2 11 190 2009-2011 East 2 2 146 2009-2011 West 0 9 44 2009-2011 North Dakota 17 343 290 2009-2011 Ohio 0 0 2009-2010 Oklahoma 865 2,117 5,024 2009-2011 Pennsylvania 53 1,583 3,322 2009-2011 Texas 1,267 2,425 10,263 2009-2011 RRC District 1 0 251 48 2009-2011 RRC District 2 Onshore 5 402 2010-2011 RRC District 3 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011

309

Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

6,363 10,661 25,993 2009-2011 6,363 10,661 25,993 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 6,363 10,661 25,993 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 1,585 861 502 2009-2011 California 912 2011-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 912 2011-2011 Colorado 0 1 4 2009-2011 Kentucky 44 3 44 2009-2011 Louisiana 636 1,856 2,002 2009-2011 North 636 1,856 2,002 2009-2011 Michigan 149 165 140 2009-2011 Montana 42 14 14 2009-2011 New Mexico 2 1 83 2009-2011 East 0 1 68 2009-2011 West 2 0 15 2009-2011 North Dakota 119 528 439 2009-2011 Ohio 0 0 2009-2010 Oklahoma 1,373 1,352 3,709 2009-2011 Pennsylvania 299 1,994 5,238 2009-2011 Texas 2,052 3,580 12,185 2009-2011 RRC District 1 1 322 2,141 2009-2011 RRC District 2 Onshore 6 388 2010-2011 RRC District 3 Onshore

310

Delaware Basin Monitoring Annual Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Delaware Basin Drilling Surveillance Program (DBDSP) is designed to monitor drilling activities in the vicinity of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). This program is based on Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requirements. The EPA environmental standards for the management and disposal of transuranic (TRU) radioactive waste are codified in 40 CFR Part 191 (EPA 1993). Subparts B and C of the standard address the disposal of radioactive waste. The standard requires the Department of Energy (DOE) to demonstrate the expected performance of the disposal system using a probabilistic risk assessment or performance assessment (PA). This PA must show that the expected repository performance will not release radioactive material above limits set by the EPA's standard. This assessment must include the consideration of inadvertent drilling into the repository at some future time.

Washington Regulatory and Environmental Services; Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2004-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

311

Delaware Basin Monitoring Annual Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Delaware Basin Drilling Surveillance Program (DBDSP) is designed to monitor drilling activities in the vicinity of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). This program is based on Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requirements. The EPA environmental standards for the management and disposal of transuranic (TRU) radioactive waste are codified in 40 CFR Part 191 (EPA 1993). Subparts B and C of the standard address the disposal of radioactive waste. The standard requires the Department of Energy (DOE) to demonstrate the expected performance of the disposal system using a probabilistic risk assessment or performance assessment (PA). This PA must show that the expected repository performance will not release radioactive material above limits set by the EPA's standard. This assessment must include the consideration of inadvertent drilling into the repository at some future time.

Washington Regulatory and Environmental Services; Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2003-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

312

Delaware Basin Monitoring Annual Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Delaware Basin Drilling Surveillance Program (DBDSP) is designed to monitor drilling activities in the vicinity of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). This program is based on Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requirements. The EPA environmental standards for the management and disposal of transuranic (TRU) radioactive waste are codified in 40 CFR Part 191 (EPA 1993). Subparts B and C of the standard address the disposal of radioactive waste. The standard requires the Department of Energy (DOE) to demonstrate the expected performance of the disposal system using a probabilistic risk assessment or performance assessment (PA). This PA must show that the expected repository performance will not release radioactive material above limits set by the EPA's standard. This assessment must include the consideration of inadvertent drilling into the repository at some future time.

Washington Regulatory and Environmental Services; Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2005-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

313

K Basins isolation barriers summary report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The 105-K East and 105-K West fuel storage basins (105-K Basins) were designed and constructed in the early 1950`s for interim storage of irradiated fuel following its discharge from the reactors. The 105-K- East and 105-K West reactor buildings were constructed first, and the associated storage basins were added about a year later. The construction joint between each reactor building structure and the basin structure included a flexible membrane waterstop to prevent leakage. Water in the storage basins provided both radiation shielding and cooling to remove decay heat from stored fuel until its transfer to the Plutonium Uranium Extraction (PUREX) Facility for chemical processing. The 105-K West Reactor was permanently shut down in February 1970; the 105-K East Reactor was permanently shut down in February 1971. Except for a few loose pieces, fuel stored in the basins at that time was shipped to the PUREX Facility for processing. The basins were then left idle but were kept filled with water. The PUREX Facility was shut down and placed on wet standby in 1972 while N Reactor continued to operate. When the N Reactor fuel storage basin began to approach storage capacity, the decision was made to modify the fuel storage basins at 105-K East and 105-K West to provide additional storage capacity. Both basins were subsequently modified (105-K East in 1975 and 105-K West in 1981) to provide for the interim handling and storage of irradiated N Reactor fuel. The PUREX Facility was restarted in November 1983 to provide 1698 additional weapons-grade plutonium for the United States defense mission. The facility was shut down and deactivated in December 1992 when the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) determined that the plant was no longer needed to support weapons-grade plutonium production. When the PUREX Facility was shut down, approximately 2.1 x 1 06 kg (2,100 metric tons) of irradiated fuel aged 7 to 23 years was left in storage in the 105-K Basins pending a decision on final disposition of the material. The Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (Ecology et al. 1994), also known as the Tri-Party Agreement, commits to the removal of all fuel and sludge from the 105-K Basins by the year 2002.

Strickland, G.C., Westinghouse Hanford

1996-07-31T23:59:59.000Z

314

Assessment of Basin-Scale Hydrologic Impacts of CO2 Sequestration, Illinois Basin1 Mark Person*1  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

: Mount Simon, Illinois Basin, CO2, earthquakes, pressure, brine transport69 #12;Page | 3 1. IntroductionPage | 1 Assessment of Basin-Scale Hydrologic Impacts of CO2 Sequestration, Illinois Basin1 2 3 4 sharp-interface models of CO2 injection were constructed for the Illinois49 Basin in which porosity

Gable, Carl W.

315

Death of a carbonate basin: The Niagara-Salina transition in the Michigan basin  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The A-O Carbonate in the Michigan basin comprises a sequence of laminated calcite/anhydrite layers intercalated with bedded halite at the transition between normal marine Niagaran carbonates and lower Salina Group evaporites. The carbonate/anhydrite interbeds represent freshing events during initial evaporative concentration of the Michigan basin. Recent drilling in the Michigan basin delineates two distinct regions of A-O Carbonate development: a 5 to 10 m thick sequence of six 'laminites' found throughout most of the western and northern basin and a 10 to 25 m thick sequence in the southeastern basin containing both thicker 'laminates' and thicker salt interbeds. Additionally, potash deposits of the overlying A-1 evaporite unit are restricted to the northern and western basin regions. The distribution of evaporite facies in these two regions is adequately explained by a source of basin recharge in the southeast-perhaps the 'Clinton Inlet' of earlier workers. This situation suggest either that: (1) the source of basin recharge is alternately supplying preconcentrated brine and more normal marine water, or (2) that the basin received at least two distinct sources of water during A-O deposition.

Leibold, A.W.; Howell, P.D. (Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor (United States))

1991-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

316

Hinsdale Wave Basin 1 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Hinsdale Wave Basin 1 Hinsdale Wave Basin 1 Jump to: navigation, search Basic Specifications Facility Name Hinsdale Wave Basin 1 Overseeing Organization Oregon State University Hydrodynamics Hydrodynamic Testing Facility Type Wave Basin Length(m) 104.0 Beam(m) 3.7 Depth(m) 4.6 Cost(per day) $3500 Towing Capabilities Towing Capabilities None Wavemaking Capabilities Wavemaking Capabilities Yes Maximum Wave Height(m) 1.8 Maximum Wave Height(m) at Wave Period(s) 10.0 Wave Period Range(s) 10.0 Current Velocity Range(m/s) 0.0 Programmable Wavemaking Yes Wavemaking Description Monochromatic waves (cnoidal, Stokes, Airy), solitary waves, user-defined free surface timeseries or board displacement timeseries for random waves Wave Direction Uni-Directional Simulated Beach Yes Description of Beach 12' by 12' concrete slabs anchored to flume walls

317

K Basins Sludge Treatment Project Phase 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

K Basins Sludge Treatment Project Phase 1 K Basins Sludge Treatment Project Phase 1 Technology Readiness Assessment Report Herb G. Sutter Michael Poirier Art W. Etchells Gary Smith Kris Thomas Jim J. Davis Paul Macbeth November 16, 2009 Prepared by the U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. K Basins Sludge Treatment Project Phase 1 Technology Readiness Assessment Report November 16, 2009 ii Herbert G. Sutter, Team Lead Date Michael Poirier, Team Member Date Arthur W. Etchells, Team Member Date Gary Smith, Team Member Date Kris Thomas, Team Member Date Jim J. Davis, Team Member Date Paul Macbeth, Team Member Date Signatures 11/09/2009 11/09/2009 11/09/2009 K Basins Sludge Treatment Project Phase 1 Technology Readiness Assessment Report November 16, 2009

318

Alden Wave Basin | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Wave Basin Wave Basin Jump to: navigation, search Basic Specifications Facility Name Alden Wave Basin Overseeing Organization Alden Research Laboratory, Inc Hydrodynamic Testing Facility Type Wave Basin Length(m) 33.5 Beam(m) 21.3 Depth(m) 1.2 Water Type Freshwater Cost(per day) Depends on study Towing Capabilities Towing Capabilities None Wavemaking Capabilities Wavemaking Capabilities Yes Maximum Wave Height(m) 0.3 Maximum Wave Height(m) at Wave Period(s) 1.0 Maximum Wave Length(m) 1.8 Wave Period Range(s) 1.0 Current Velocity Range(m/s) 0.0 Programmable Wavemaking Yes Wavemaking Description Period adjustable electronically, height adjustable mechanically Wave Direction Both Simulated Beach Yes Description of Beach Designed as needed using commercially available sand/sediment

319

Progress Update: H4 Basin Concrete Pour  

ScienceCinema (OSTI)

The Recovery Act funded project in the H area basin. A concrete ditch built longer than half a mile to prevent contaminated water from expanding and to reduce the footprint on the environment.

None

2012-06-14T23:59:59.000Z

320

Flathead Basin Commission Act of 1983 (Montana)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This Act establishes the Flathead Basin Commission, the purpose of which is to protect the Flathead Lake aquatic environment, its waters, and surrounding lands and natural resources. The Commission...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "joaquin basin onshore" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

The Uinta Basin Case Robert J. Bayer  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Overburden Tailings Oil Shale Mining Open Pit Underground Ex situ extraction Ex situ thermal conversion EIS for Oil Sands and Oil Shale Ongoing concerns with Basin-wide air quality Wildlife and wildlife

Utah, University of

322

Sheets Wave Basin | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Sheets Wave Basin Sheets Wave Basin Jump to: navigation, search Basic Specifications Facility Name Sheets Wave Basin Overseeing Organization University of Rhode Island Hydrodynamic Testing Facility Type Wave Basin Length(m) 30.0 Beam(m) 3.6 Depth(m) 1.8 Cost(per day) $750(+ Labor/Materials) Towing Capabilities Towing Capabilities Yes Maximum Velocity(m/s) 2.0 Length of Effective Tow(m) 25.0 Wavemaking Capabilities Wavemaking Capabilities Yes Maximum Wave Height(m) 0.3 Maximum Wave Height(m) at Wave Period(s) 3.0 Maximum Wave Length(m) 10 Wave Period Range(s) 3.0 Current Velocity Range(m/s) 0.0 Programmable Wavemaking Yes Wavemaking Description Pre-programmed for regular and irregular waves, but wavemaker is capable of any input motion. Wave Direction Uni-Directional

323

Haynes Wave Basin | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Wave Basin Wave Basin Jump to: navigation, search Basic Specifications Facility Name Haynes Wave Basin Overseeing Organization Texas A&M (Haynes) Hydrodynamic Testing Facility Type Wave Basin Length(m) 38.1 Beam(m) 22.9 Depth(m) 1.5 Water Type Freshwater Cost(per day) $150/hour (excluding labor) Towing Capabilities Towing Capabilities None Wavemaking Capabilities Wavemaking Capabilities Yes Maximum Wave Height(m) 0.6 Maximum Wave Height(m) at Wave Period(s) 3.3 Maximum Wave Length(m) 10.7 Wave Period Range(s) 3.3 Current Velocity Range(m/s) 0.2 Programmable Wavemaking Yes Wavemaking Description Directional, irregular, any spectrum, cnoidal or solitary wave Wave Direction Both Simulated Beach Yes Description of Beach Stone Channel/Tunnel/Flume Channel/Tunnel/Flume None

324

Assessment of undiscovered carboniferous coal-bed gas resources of the Appalachian Basin and Black Warrior Basin Provinces, 2002  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Coalbed methane (CBM) occurs in coal beds of Mississippian and Pennsylvanian (Carboniferous) age in the Appalachian basin, which extends almost continuously from New York to Alabama. In general, the basin includes three structural subbasins: the Dunkard basin in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and northern West Virginia; the Pocahontas basin in southern West Virginia, eastern Kentucky, and southwestern Virginia; and the Black Warrior basin in Alabama and Mississippi. For assessment purposes, the Appalachian basin was divided into two assessment provinces: the Appalachian Basin Province from New York to Alabama, and the Black Warrior Basin Province in Alabama and Mississippi. By far, most of the coalbed methane produced in the entire Appalachian basin has come from the Black Warrior Basin Province. 8 refs., 1 fig., 1 tab.

Milici, R.C.; Hatch, J.R.

2004-09-15T23:59:59.000Z

325

Mineralogy and organic petrology of oil shales in the Sangkarewang formation, Ombilin Basin, West Sumatra, Indonesia.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??The Ombilin Basin, which lies in Sumatra Island, is one of the Tertiary basins in Indonesia. This basin contains a wide variety of rock units, (more)

Fatimah, Fatimah

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

326

Basin evolution, diagenesis and uranium mineralization in the PaleoproterozicThelon Basin,  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Basin evolution, diagenesis and uranium mineralization in the PaleoproterozicThelon Basin, Nunavut,Canada Eric E. Hiatt,n Sarah E. Palmer,w1 T. Kurt Kyserw and Terrence K. O'Connorz n Geology Department, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, Oshkosh,Wisconsin, USA wDepartment of Geological Sciences and Engineering

Hiatt, Eric E.

327

Williston in the family of cratonic basins  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Williston basin is one of a clan of subcircular to elliptical elements in the interiors of all cratons; such basins are distinguished by characteristics common to all. In each, the basement consists of continental crust and each basin is surrounded by areas of continental crust. Subsidence rates are typically low, so that conditions near depositional base level prevailed during much of the history of sediment accumulation. Episodic subsidence occurred over time spans of 10/sup 7/-10/sup 8/ years; major episodes of subsidence are broadly concurrent on all cratons. Tectonic tempo and mode of subsidence evolved synchronously on all cratons; therefore, similar isopach and facies patterns (and similar oil or gas maturation, migration, and trap potentials) occur on all cratons. All members of the clan exhibit a range of individual variations imposed by latitude and climate. Intraplate tectonism and volcanism, approach to or distance from source areas, and distribution paths of detrital sediment. Nevertheless, facts and concepts developed by intensive study of basins with high-density documentation (outcrop and subsurface) are commonly applicable to basins such as the Williston, which is in a less mature stage of exploration.

Sloss, L.L.

1985-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

328

E-Print Network 3.0 - athabasca basin western Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Thelon Basin Boomerang Lake Western Thelon Basin Eastern Thelon... to the world-class uranium-producing Athabasca basin. At present, the Thelon basin is only known to host......

329

Origin Basin Destination State STB EIA STB EIA Northern Appalachian Basin  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Florida W $38.51 W $140.84 27.3% 134 W 100.0% Florida W $38.51 W $140.84 27.3% 134 W 100.0% Northern Appalachian Basin Georgia - W - W W W - W Northern Appalachian Basin Indiana W $16.14 W $63.35 25.5% 1,681 W 88.5% Northern Appalachian Basin Maryland $20.69 $19.60 -5.3% $74.23 26.4% 4,845 31.9% 97.7% Northern Appalachian Basin Michigan $13.74 $16.13 17.4% $99.82 16.2% 840 32.1% 100.0% Northern Appalachian Basin New Hampshire W $40.18 W $94.03 42.7% 699 W 100.0% Northern Appalachian Basin New Jersey W $32.44 W $89.13 36.4% 1,064 W 47.6% Northern Appalachian Basin New York $21.87 $18.86 -13.8% $59.40 31.7% 2,373 49.3% 91.9%

330

Origin Basin Destination State STB EIA STB EIA Northern Appalachian Basin  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Delaware W $28.49 W $131.87 21.6% 59 W 100.0% Delaware W $28.49 W $131.87 21.6% 59 W 100.0% Northern Appalachian Basin Florida W - - - - - - - Northern Appalachian Basin Indiana W $20.35 W $64.82 31.4% 1,715 W 75.9% Northern Appalachian Basin Maryland $19.73 $19.64 -0.4% $81.15 24.2% 4,650 24.8% 99.3% Northern Appalachian Basin Michigan W $14.02 W $76.22 18.4% 713 W 100.0% Northern Appalachian Basin New Hampshire W $43.43 W $90.90 47.8% 499 W 89.6% Northern Appalachian Basin New Jersey W $27.19 W $74.81 36.3% 1,864 W 44.1% Northern Appalachian Basin New York $20.08 $15.26 -24.0% $53.68 28.4% 3,726 39.2% 79.1%

331

Sediment Basin Flume | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Sediment Basin Flume Sediment Basin Flume Jump to: navigation, search Basic Specifications Facility Name Sediment Basin Flume Overseeing Organization University of Iowa Hydrodynamic Testing Facility Type Flume Length(m) 22.7 Beam(m) 5.1 Depth(m) 1.2 Cost(per day) Contact POC Special Physical Features Two pumps provide up to 18 cfs of flow capacity Towing Capabilities Towing Capabilities None Wavemaking Capabilities Wavemaking Capabilities None Channel/Tunnel/Flume Channel/Tunnel/Flume Yes Recirculating No Wind Capabilities Wind Capabilities None Control and Data Acquisition Cameras None Available Sensors Acoustics, Flow, Thermal, Turbulence, Velocity Data Generation Capability Real-Time Yes Test Services Test Services Yes On-Site fabrication capability/equipment Machine shop, carpenter shop, welding shop, instrumentation and electronics shop

332

Dan Klempel Basin Electric Power Cooperative DOE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Dan Dan Klempel Basin Electric Power Cooperative DOE 2009 Congestion Study Workshop Oklahoma City, Oklahoma June 18, 2008 Page 1 of 5 Basin Electric Power Cooperative would like to thank the Department of Energy for this opportunity to share some of our thoughts on transmission congestion issues. Basin Electric is a wholesale power supplier to rural electric cooperatives located in the mid-west and in both the east and west interconnections. Naturally, our generation and transmission facilities also reside in both interconnections so we use asynchronous back-to-back DC facilities to balance loads with resources. With headquarters in Bismarck, North Dakota; we find ourselves in the heart of some of the nations most desirable wind patterns for potential renewable energy development as well as electric energy production from more traditional sources. Lignite coal has been a reliable

333

Hinsdale Wave Basin 2 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Wave Basin 2 Wave Basin 2 Jump to: navigation, search Basic Specifications Facility Name Hinsdale Wave Basin 2 Overseeing Organization Oregon State University Hydrodynamics Length(m) 48.8 Beam(m) 26.5 Depth(m) 2.1 Water Type Freshwater Cost(per day) $3500 Towing Capabilities Towing Capabilities None Wavemaking Capabilities Wavemaking Capabilities Yes Maximum Wave Height(m) 0.8 Maximum Wave Height(m) at Wave Period(s) 10.0 Wave Period Range(s) 10.0 Current Velocity Range(m/s) 0.0 Programmable Wavemaking Yes Wavemaking Description Monochromatic waves (cnoidal, Stokes, Airy), solitary waves, user-defined free surface timeseries or board displacement timeseries for random waves Wave Direction Both Simulated Beach Yes Description of Beach Built to client specifications, currently rigid concrete over gravel fill

334

SWP.SanJuanBasin.factsheet0919  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Principal Investigator Reid Grigg/Brian McPherson NMT reid@prrc.nmt.edu / brian@nmt.edu Field Test Information: Field Test Name San Juan Basin, New Mexico: Enhanced Coalbed Methane-Sequestration Test Test Location Near Navajo City, New Mexico Amount and Source of CO 2 Tons Source 20,000 - 35,000 tons; CO2 sourced from McElmo Dome, CO ConocoPhillips KinderMorgan CO 2 Company, L.P. Field Test Partners (Primary Sponsors) Summary of Field Test Site and Operations General Geology and Target Reservoirs: The San Juan basin (SJB) is one of the top ranked basins in the world for CO 2 coalbed sequestration because it has: 1) advantageous geology and high methane content; 2) abundant anthropogenic CO

335

Southern Basin and Range Geothermal Region | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Basin and Range Geothermal Region Basin and Range Geothermal Region Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Southern Basin and Range Geothermal Region Details Areas (0) Power Plants (0) Projects (0) Techniques (0) Map: {{{Name}}} North-south-striking and west-dipping Basin and Range province normal faults form the western edge of the Sierra Madre Occidental plateau in northeastern Sonora. These faults and associated half-grabens extend over a distance of more than 300 km between the San Bernardino basin in the north and the Sahuaripa basin in the south. Active Tectonics of Northeastern Sonora, Mexico (Southern Basin and Range Province) and the 3 May 1887 Mw 7.4 Earthquake [1] References ↑ "Active Tectonics of Northeastern Sonora, Mexico (Southern Basin and Range Province) and the 3 May 1887 Mw 7.4 Earthquake"

336

Sources of Atmospheric Moisture for the La Plata River Basin  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The La Plata River basin (LPRB) is the second largest basin of South America and extends over a highly populated and socioeconomically active region. In this study, the spatiotemporal variability of sources of moisture for the LPRB are quantified ...

J. Alejandro Martinez; Francina Dominguez

2014-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

337

Grande Ronde Basin Fish Habitat Enhancement Project : 1998 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The primary goal of ''The Grande Ronde Basin Fish Habitat Improvement Project'' is to access, create, improve, protect, and restore reparian and instream habitat for anadromous salmonids, thereby maximizing opportunities for natural fish production within the basin.

McGowan, Vance R.; Powell, Russ M.

1999-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

338

Colorado Division of Water Resources Denver Basin Webpage | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Denver Basin Webpage Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: Colorado Division of Water Resources Denver Basin Webpage Abstract This is the...

339

Definition of structural patterns using dipmeter and magnetism data within the poorly seismic imaged field of Avocette, presalt Gabonese Basin  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In the Gabonese southern Onshore Basin, several oil fields occur below an Aptian salt sequence. Because of the presence of diapirs and salt walls related to post aptian salt tectonics, the quality of the 2D or 3D seismic imaging of the presalt formations stays very insufficient to well define the structural patterns within the traps below the salt. This problem is particularly important in the Avocette oil field where the poor quality of the seismic is also related to very high dips within the presalt formations. Indeed the dipmeter analysis demonstrates that the values of dips can reach 80 deg. to be vertical within some of the reservoirs. To define the complex geometry of the field, depth cross-sections have been constructed using: (1) magnetism and gravimetric data which allow to propose a depth and also a structural framework for the basement; (2) dipmeter analysis which provides for the whole presalt sequence very good results for the geometry, but also for the age of deformation. Indeed, the biostratigraphy is well defined and it is possible to date characteristic features as growth faulting demonstrated by the dipmeter. This allows to propose a presalt kinematic evolution for the field and adjacent area which can be summarized as follow: the structure corresponds to a faulted roll-over anticline, related to Upper Barremian to Aptian progressive gravity spreading of thick lacustrine deltaic sequences. During Upper Aptian the roll-over anticline is partially eroded and overlaid by a regional sandstone deposits. Last movements on the major faults deformed this horizon which constitutes now the main reservoir of the Avocette oil field.

Guerin, G. (Elf Petroleum Norge, Stavanger (Norway)); Lecanu, H.; Icart, J.C. (Elf Aquitaine Production, Pau-Paris (France)) (and others)

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

340

Definition of structural patterns using dipmeter and magnetism data within the poorly seismic imaged field of Avocette, presalt Gabonese Basin  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In the Gabonese southern Onshore Basin, several oil fields occur below an Aptian salt sequence. Because of the presence of diapirs and salt walls related to post aptian salt tectonics, the quality of the 2D or 3D seismic imaging of the presalt formations stays very insufficient to well define the structural patterns within the traps below the salt. This problem is particularly important in the Avocette oil field where the poor quality of the seismic is also related to very high dips within the presalt formations. Indeed the dipmeter analysis demonstrates that the values of dips can reach 80 deg. to be vertical within some of the reservoirs. To define the complex geometry of the field, depth cross-sections have been constructed using: (1) magnetism and gravimetric data which allow to propose a depth and also a structural framework for the basement; (2) dipmeter analysis which provides for the whole presalt sequence very good results for the geometry, but also for the age of deformation. Indeed, the biostratigraphy is well defined and it is possible to date characteristic features as growth faulting demonstrated by the dipmeter. This allows to propose a presalt kinematic evolution for the field and adjacent area which can be summarized as follow: the structure corresponds to a faulted roll-over anticline, related to Upper Barremian to Aptian progressive gravity spreading of thick lacustrine deltaic sequences. During Upper Aptian the roll-over anticline is partially eroded and overlaid by a regional sandstone deposits. Last movements on the major faults deformed this horizon which constitutes now the main reservoir of the Avocette oil field.

Guerin, G. [Elf Petroleum Norge, Stavanger (Norway); Lecanu, H.; Icart, J.C. [Elf Aquitaine Production, Pau-Paris (France)] [and others

1996-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "joaquin basin onshore" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

NE Pacific Basin --Tagging Data Kate Myers, Ph.D.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Ocean B: NE Pacific Basin --Tagging Data Kate Myers, Ph.D. Principal Investigator, High Seas Salmon ocean tagging research on Columbia River salmon and steelhead migrating in the NE Pacific Basin R. Basin in 1995-2004. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Pacific Biological Station, Nanaimo, B

342

Lithosphere structure beneath the Phanerozoic intracratonic basins of North America  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Abstract Four intracratonic basins of North America, the Hudson Bay, Michigan, Illinois and Williston. The Williston and Illinois basins are associated with wide (V200 km) and thin anomalies (V100 km), whereas basin and 270 km beneath the Williston [4,6]. For two ba- sins of similar age located on the same Precam

Kaminski, Edouard

343

BIOSTRATIGRAPHY, WILLISTON BASIN By D.J. Nichols  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Chapter WB BIOSTRATIGRAPHY, WILLISTON BASIN By D.J. Nichols in U.S. Geological Survey Professional .........................................................................................................WB-3 Figures WB-1. Biostratigraphic reference sections in the Williston Basin. WB-2. Occurrences. Palynostratigraphic zones of the Paleocene in the Williston Basin composite reference section. WB-4. Distribution

344

Area environmental characterization report of the Dalhart and Palo Duro basins in the Texas Panhandle. Volume II. Palo Duro basin  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This area report describes the environmental characteristics of the Dalhart and Palo Duro basins of the Texas Panhandle portion of the Permian basin. Both basins are rather sparsely populated, and the overall population is decreasing. The economic base is centered on agribusiness and manufacturing. Most of the potentially conflicting land uses in both basins (i.e., parks, historic sites) occupy small land areas, with the exception of a national grassland in the Dalhart and military air training routes in both basins. Ground transportation in the Dalhart basin is adequate, and it is well developed in the Palo Duro basin. In both basins irrigation constitutes the principal water use, and groundwater is the principal source. However, the dominant aquifer, the Ogallala, is being depleted. Both basins consist primarily of grasslands, rangelands, and agricultural areas. No critical terrestrial or aquatic habitats have been identified in the basins, though several endangered, threatened, or rare terrestrial species occur in or near the basins. Aquatic resources in both basins are limited because of the intermittent availability of water and the high salt content of some water bodies. Playa lakes are common, though usually seasonal or rain dependent. The climate of the area is semiarid, with low humidity, relatively high wind speeds, and high variable precipitation. Restrictive dispersion conditions are infrequent. National ambient secondary air quality standards for particulates are being exceeded in the area, largely because of fugitive dust, although there are some particulate point sources.

Not Available

1982-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

345

Area environmental characterization report of the Dalhart and Palo Duro basins in the Texas Panhandle. Volume I. Dalhart Basin  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This area report describes the environmental characteristics of the Dalhart and Palo Duro basins of the Texas Panhandle portion of the Permian basin. Both basins are rather sparsely populated, and the overall population is decreasing. The economic base is centered on agribusiness and manufacturing. Most of the potentially conflicting land uses in both basins (i.e., parks, historic sites) occupy small land areas, with the exception of a national grassland in the Dalhart and military air training routes in both basins. Ground transportation in the Dalhart basin is adequate, and it is well developed in the Palo Duro basin. In both basins irrigation constitutes the principal water use, and groundwater is the principal source. However, the dominant aquifer, the Ogallala, is being depleted. Both basins consist primarily of grasslands, rangelands, and agricultural areas. No critical terrestrial or aquatic habitats have been identified in the basins, though several endangered, threatened, or rare terrestrial species occur in or near the basins. Aquatic resources in both basins are limited because of the intermittent availability of water and the high salt content of some water bodies. Playa lakes are common, though usually seasonal or rain dependent. The climate of the area is semiarid, with low humidity, relatively high wind speeds, and highly variable prcipitation. Restrictive dispersion conditions are infrequent. National ambient secondary air quality standards for particulates are being exceeded in the area, largely because of fugitive dust, although there are some particulate point sources.

Not Available

1982-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

346

Timing and Tectonic implications of basin inversion in the Nam Con Son Basin and adjacent areas, southern South China Sea  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

and Malay basins. Contraction in the Western NCS, West Natuna, and Malay basins was accommodated through reactivation of major basin-bounding fault systems that resulted in asymmetric fault-bend folding of syn- and early post-rift strata. Inversion...

Olson, Christopher Charles

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

347

Tobacco vs. helminths in Congo basin hunter-gatherers Tobacco use vs. helminths in Congo basin hunter-gatherers  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Tobacco vs. helminths in Congo basin hunter-gatherers 1 Tobacco use vs. helminths in Congo basin hunter-gatherers: Self-medication in humans? Casey J-546-9257 #12;Tobacco vs. helminths in Congo basin hunter-gatherers 2 Summary

348

OTRC Wave Basin | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

OTRC Wave Basin OTRC Wave Basin Jump to: navigation, search Basic Specifications Facility Name OTRC Wave Basin Overseeing Organization Texas A&M (OTRC) Hydrodynamic Testing Facility Type Wave Basin Length(m) 45.7 Beam(m) 30.5 Depth(m) 5.8 Water Type Freshwater Cost(per day) $300/hour (excluding labor) Special Physical Features 4.6m wide x 9.1m long x 16.8m deep pit with adjustable depth floor in test area Towing Capabilities Towing Capabilities Yes Maximum Velocity(m/s) 0.6 Length of Effective Tow(m) 27.4 Wavemaking Capabilities Wavemaking Capabilities Yes Maximum Wave Height(m) 0.9 Maximum Wave Height(m) at Wave Period(s) 4.0 Maximum Wave Length(m) 25 Wave Period Range(s) 4.0 Current Velocity Range(m/s) 0.6 Programmable Wavemaking Yes Wavemaking Description GEDAP 3D wave generation software, 48 hinged flap wave generator

349

Upper San Juan Basin Biological Assessment  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

the biological assessment. The Colorado Natural Heritage Program began its research by updating its BiologicalUpper San Juan Basin Biological Assessment Colorado State University 8002 Campus Delivery Fort Collins, CO 80523-8002 June 2003 Colorado Natural Heritage Program #12;Southwest Land Alliance Pagosa

350

The State of the Columbia River Basin  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

: The State of the Columbia River Basin in 2012 07 Northwest Energy Efficiency Achievements, 1978-2011 10 Council undertakes mid-term review of Sixth Power Plan 11 Energy Efficiency met most of the new and Commerce United states House of representatives and Committee on Natural resources United states House

351

The State of the Columbia River Basin  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, and Washington. The Act authorized the Council to serve as a comprehensive planning agency for energy policy and fish and wildlife policy in the Columbia River Basin and to inform the public about energy and fish Overview 11 Sixth Northwest Power Plan boosts energy efficiency, renewable energy, Energy efficiency

352

GUNNISON BASIN CLIMATE CHANGE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Climate change is already changing ecosystems and affecting people in the southwestern United States, as well as ecosystem services, e.g., water supply. The climate of the Gunnison Basin, Colorado Fish and Wildlife Service, US Forest Service, Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District, Western

Neff, Jason

353

Summary - K Basins Sludge Treatment Process  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

K Basin K Basin DOE is Proces the va at Han subsys oxidati objecti of-fact maturi Eleme Techn The as which seven * M * M * Pr * Pr * As The Ele Site: H roject: K P Report Date: A ited States Why DOE ns Sludge Treatme s constructing ss (STP) for re rious sludge st nford. The STP stems: sludge ion, assay, pac ive of the asse t" appraisal of t ty by first ident ents (CTEs) of t ology Readine What th ssessment team was further div CTEs and the Material Mobiliza Material Transfe rocess Chemis rocess Instrum ssay (TRL=2) To view the full T http://www.em.doe. objective of a Tech ements (CTEs), usin Hanford/ORP K Basins Slud Process/STP August 2007 Departmen K Bas E-EM Did This ent Process Flow D a K Basins Slu trieving, treatin treams stored i P is comprised containerizatio ckaging, and dr ssment was to the project's ov

354

K Basin sludge dissolution engineering study  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this engineering study is to investigate the available technology related to dissolution of the K Basin sludge in nitric acid. The conclusion of this study along with laboratory and hot cell tests with actual sludge samples will provide the basis for beginning conceptual design of the sludge dissolver. The K Basin sludge contains uranium oxides, fragments of metallic U, and some U hydride as well as ferric oxyhydroxide, aluminum oxides and hydroxides, windblown sand that infiltrated the basin enclosure, ion exchange resin, and miscellaneous materials. The decision has been made to dispose of this sludge separate from the fuel elements stored in the basins. The sludge will be conditioned so that it meets Tank Waste Remediation System waste acceptance criteria and can be sent to one of the underground storage tanks. Sludge conditioning will be done by dissolving the fuel constituents in nitric acid, separating the insoluble material, adding neutron absorbers for criticality safety, and then reacting the solution with caustic to co-precipitate the uranium and plutonium. There will be five distinct feed streams to the sludge conditioning process two from the K East (KE) Basin and three from the K West (KW) Basin. The composition of the floor and pit sludges which contain more iron oxides and sand than uranium is much different than the canister sludges which are composed of mostly uranium oxides. The sludge conditioning equipment will be designed to process all of the sludge streams, but some of the operating parameters will be adjusted as necessary to handle the different sludge stream compositions. The volume of chemical additions and the amount of undissolved solids will be much different for floor and pit sludge than for canister sludge. Dissolution of uranium metal and uranium dioxide has been studied quite thoroughly and much information is available. Both uranium metal and uranium dioxide have been dissolved on a large scale in nuclear fuel reprocessing plants in Europe, Japan, and the USA. Ash and sludge containing uranium compounds also have been dissolved in reprocessing or plutonium scrap recovery plants, but only a limited amount of information is available on how the ferric oxyhydroxide, aluminum compounds and silicates in the sand will behave during nitric acid dissolution. Laboratory work with simulants and hot cell work with actual K Basin sludge is in progress to obtain data in these areas.

Westra, A.G.

1998-08-28T23:59:59.000Z

355

Gravity-driven structures and rift basin evolution: Rio Muni Basin, offshore equatorial West Africa  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Offshore Equatorial Guinea, west Africa, gravity-driven nappes, more than 1 km thick and 15 km from head to toe, provide key evidence in reconstructing the late synrift: evolution of this part of the South Atlantic margin basin system. Furthermore, Aptian-Cenomanian carbonate and clastic rocks in the nappes` allochthonous hanging walls are attracting interest as a new exploration play in west Africa. The nappes exhibit a range of geometries that suggest they share many of the same deformation processes as thin-skin thrust and linked extensional fault systems. Not only are these structures significant in their own right, representing a rare example of gravity tectonics in the virtual absence of major halokinesis, but their presence may record an other-wise undetectable process active during the transition from a rift basin to a passive continental margin. A review of Equatorial Guinea in its pre-Atlantic configuration, alongside neighboring basins in Brazil (the Sergipe-Alagoas basin) and Gabon, suggests that gravity gliding was sustained by a relatively steep, westward paleoslope promoted by east-ward offset of the locus of thermal uplift from the rift basin (i.e., a simple shear model of basin formation). In contrast to gravity-driven structures in most postrift settings, the Equatorial Guinea nappes developed at the close of the Aptian-Albian synrift episode in response to a growing bathymetric deep caused by rapid subsidence outpacing restricted sedimentation.

Turner, J.P. [Univ. of Birmingham (United Kingdom)

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

356

Delaware River Basin Commission (Multiple States) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Delaware River Basin Commission (Multiple States) Delaware River Basin Commission (Multiple States) Delaware River Basin Commission (Multiple States) < Back Eligibility Utility Commercial Agricultural Investor-Owned Utility State/Provincial Govt Industrial Construction Municipal/Public Utility Local Government Installer/Contractor Rural Electric Cooperative Tribal Government Systems Integrator Savings Category Water Buying & Making Electricity Home Weatherization Program Info Start Date 1961 State Delaware Program Type Environmental Regulations Siting and Permitting Provider Project Review Section The Delaware River Basin Commission (DRBC) is a federal-interstate compact government agency that was formed by concurrent legislation enacted in 1961 by the United States and the four basin states (Pennsylvania, New York, New

357

Rappahannock River Basin Commission (Virginia) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Rappahannock River Basin Commission (Virginia) Rappahannock River Basin Commission (Virginia) Rappahannock River Basin Commission (Virginia) < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Developer Fed. Government Fuel Distributor General Public/Consumer Industrial Installer/Contractor Institutional Investor-Owned Utility Local Government Low-Income Residential Multi-Family Residential Municipal/Public Utility Nonprofit Residential Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative Schools State/Provincial Govt Systems Integrator Transportation Tribal Government Utility Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State Virginia Program Type Siting and Permitting Provider Rappahannock River Basin Commission The Rappahannock River Basin Commission is an independent local entity

358

Seismic stratigraphy and structure of the Progreso Basin, Ecuador  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. Watkins Examination of seismic, well log and magnetic data across the Progreso Basin shows that more than 5. 5 km of sediment has been deposited in the basin with a thick sedimentary wedge io the east. The basin, bounded by two prominent normal faults... and the La Cruz fault a small sub-basin l, as been formed with considerable deposition onlv during the iast period of basin developnient. Facies, structurah isochron and velocity maps were produced for each of the five units identified on the seismic...

Goyes Arroyo, Patricio

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

359

Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin (Multiple States) |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin (Multiple States) Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin (Multiple States) Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin (Multiple States) < Back Eligibility Commercial Construction Industrial Investor-Owned Utility Local Government Municipal/Public Utility Rural Electric Cooperative Systems Integrator Tribal Government Utility Savings Category Water Buying & Making Electricity Home Weatherization Program Info State District of Columbia Program Type Environmental Regulations Siting and Permitting Provider Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin's (ICPRB) mission is to enhance, protect, and conserve the water and associated land resources of the Potomac River and its tributaries through regional and interstate

360

Natural Gas Nonassociated Proved Reserves, Wet After Lease Separation  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

190,776 215,121 226,012 250,496 281,901 305,986 1979-2011 190,776 215,121 226,012 250,496 281,901 305,986 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 10,915 10,033 8,786 7,633 6,916 5,374 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 55 53 3 9 3 0 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 8,500 7,807 6,846 5,802 5,457 4,359 1981-2011 Texas 2,360 2,173 1,937 1,822 1,456 1,015 1981-2011 Alaska 1,447 1,270 1,139 1,090 1,021 976 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 189,329 213,851 224,873 249,406 280,880 305,010 1979-2011 Alabama 3,945 4,016 3,360 2,919 2,686 2,522 1979-2011 Arkansas 2,227 3,269 5,616 10,852 14,152 16,328 1979-2011 California 780 686 621 612 503 510 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 6 1 1 1 2 1 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 769 681 617 607 498 506 1979-2011

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "joaquin basin onshore" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Natural Gas Nonassociated Proved Reserves, Wet After Lease Separation  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

190,776 215,121 226,012 250,496 281,901 305,986 1979-2011 190,776 215,121 226,012 250,496 281,901 305,986 1979-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 10,915 10,033 8,786 7,633 6,916 5,374 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 55 53 3 9 3 0 1979-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 8,500 7,807 6,846 5,802 5,457 4,359 1981-2011 Texas 2,360 2,173 1,937 1,822 1,456 1,015 1981-2011 Alaska 1,447 1,270 1,139 1,090 1,021 976 1979-2011 Lower 48 States 189,329 213,851 224,873 249,406 280,880 305,010 1979-2011 Alabama 3,945 4,016 3,360 2,919 2,686 2,522 1979-2011 Arkansas 2,227 3,269 5,616 10,852 14,152 16,328 1979-2011 California 780 686 621 612 503 510 1979-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 6 1 1 1 2 1 1979-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 769 681 617 607 498 506 1979-2011

362

Hydrocarbon potential of basins along Australia's southern margin  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Seven discrete sedimentary basins are recognized along the southern margin of the Australian continent; namely, from east to west, the Gippsland, Bass, Sorell, Otway, Duntroon, Bight, and Bremer. All formed since the Late Jurassic in response to the separation of Australia and Antarctica, and to the opening of the Tasman Sea. Only the Gippsland basin, which has proved initial oil reserves exceeding 3.6 billion barrels, is a prolific oil province. The search for oil in the other basins has been virtually fruitless despite many similarities between these basins and the Gippsland in terms of stratigraphy and structural geology. Rift and drift components are discernible in the sedimentary successions of all basins but the precise tectonic controls on respective basin formation remain conjectural. The lack of drilling success in the Bremer, Bight, Duntroon, Otway, and Sorell basins has been attributed mainly to the paucity of mature, oil-prone source rocks. The common occurrence of stranded bitumens along the entire coastline, however, indicates oil generation. The Bass and Gippsland basins are both characterized by excellent oil-prone source rocks developed in Late Cretaceous to Early Tertiary sediments. Limited exploration success in the Bass basin is due to poorer reservoir development. The Gippsland basin is at a mature stage of exploration whereas the other basins are moderately to very sparsely explored. Consequently, there is a comparable potential for undiscovered hydrocarbons in all basins. Success in the under-explored basins will come only to those prepared to challenge the perception of low prospectivity. Many play types remain to be tested by the drill.

Willink, R.J. (SAGASCO Resources Limited, Adelaide (Australia))

1991-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

363

Why Sequencea Near-Shore Anoxic Basin?  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

a Near-Shore Anoxic Basin? a Near-Shore Anoxic Basin? Oxygen minimum zones (OMZs; areas of low dissolved oxygen concentrations) play a major role in biogeochemical cycling within the world's oceans. They are major sinks for nitrogen and sources for the gases carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide. Microbially mediated biological activity associated with these systems affects the productivity of the deep blue sea and the balance of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Thus, studies aimed at evaluating the phylogenetic variation and metabolic capacity of microbial communities within these systems have great promise to enhance our understanding of the patterns and processes that drive global biogeochemical phenomena in both aquatic and atmospheric compartments of the biosphere. To this end, JGI and

364

Mississippian Lodgepole Play, Williston Basin: A review  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Waulsortian-type carbonate mud mounds in the lower Mississippian Lodgepole formation (Bottineau interval, Madison Group) comprise an important new oil play in the Williston basin with strong regional potential. The play is typified by wells capable of producing 1000-2500 bbl of oil per day and by reserves that have as much as 0.5-3.0 million bbl of oil per well. Currently centered in Stark County, North Dakota, along the southern flank of the basin, the play includes 38 wells, with 21 producers and 6 new fields. Initial discovery was made at a Silurian test in Dickinson field, traditionally productive from Pennsylvanian sands. The largest pool discovered to date is Eland field, which has 15 producers and estimated total reserves of 12-15 million bbl. This report summarizes geologic, well-log, seismic, and production data for this play, which promises to expand considerably in the years to come.

Montgomery, S.L. [Petroleum Consultant, Seattle, WA (United States)

1996-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

365

Hydrothermal circulation in an anisotropic sedimentary basin: Application to the Okinawa back arc basin  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The authors explore the pattern of two-dimensional convection in an highly anisotropical porous medium. This physical situation is relevant to passive margin sedimentary basins consisting of interbedded coarse-grained pervious and shale matrix. They show that permeability anisotropies of the order of 10{sup 2}-10{sup 4} allow for long convective cells, of aspect ratio greater than 10, but that a combination of this parameter with a slight slope of the order of a few percent of the sedimentary layers is required to stabilize these long cells. As an example, they present the Okinawa basin, an active submarine back arc basin, with a sedimentary thickness of about 2 km and a heat flow profile across this basin, varying from 32 to 232 mWm{sup {minus}2} over a distance of 30 km. It is shown that this heat flow variation is difficult to explain with conductive mechanisms only but is well reproduced by different convective models relying on permeability anisotropy plus slope. Although the insufficient thermal and structural constraints did not allow them to build a unique model, the whole set of possible fits to the heat flow data may restrict the mean hydraulic parameters of the basin. A vertical permeability of a few tens of milidarcy and an anisotropy greater than 100 are required to produce the expected stable and active large-scale circulation. It is suggested in conclusion that this type of circulation might be active in oil- or oil-forming element migration.

Genthon, P.; Rabinowicz, M. (Groupe de Recherches de Geodesie, Spatiale (France)); Foucher, J.P.; Sibuet, J.C. (Inst. Francais de Recherches pour l'Exploitation de la Mer, Plouzane (France))

1990-11-10T23:59:59.000Z

366

K Basin sludge treatment process description  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The K East (KE) and K West (KW) fuel storage basins at the 100 K Area of the Hanford Site contain sludge on the floor, in pits, and inside fuel storage canisters. The major sources of the sludge are corrosion of the fuel elements and steel structures in the basin, sand intrusion from outside the buildings, and degradation of the structural concrete that forms the basins. The decision has been made to dispose of this sludge separate from the fuel elements stored in the basins. The sludge will be treated so that it meets Tank Waste Remediation System (TWRS) acceptance criteria and can be sent to one of the double-shell waste tanks. The US Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office accepted a recommendation by Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc., to chemically treat the sludge. Sludge treatment will be done by dissolving the fuel constituents in nitric acid, separating the insoluble material, adding neutron absorbers for criticality safety, and reacting the solution with caustic to co-precipitate the uranium and plutonium. A truck will transport the resulting slurry to an underground storage tank (most likely tank 241-AW-105). The undissolved solids will be treated to reduce the transuranic (TRU) and content, stabilized in grout, and transferred to the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility (ERDF) for disposal. This document describes a process for dissolving the sludge to produce waste streams that meet the TWRS acceptance criteria for disposal to an underground waste tank and the ERDF acceptance criteria for disposal of solid waste. The process described is based on a series of engineering studies and laboratory tests outlined in the testing strategy document (Flament 1998).

Westra, A.G.

1998-08-28T23:59:59.000Z

367

Geological Modeling of Dahomey and Liberian Basins  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

eastern Ivory Coast, off Benin and western Nigeria, and off the Brazilian conjugates of these areas), while large areas were subjected to transform rifting (northern Sierra Leone, southern Liberia, Ghana and the Brazilian conjugates of these areas...). The future Demerara-Guinea marginal plateaus were also progressively subjected to this new rifting event. Stage 2: In Aptian times, the progress of rifting resulted in the creation of small divergent Basins (off northern Liberia, eastern Ivory Coast, Benin...

Gbadamosi, Hakeem B.

2010-01-16T23:59:59.000Z

368

Heat Flow in the Hungarian Basin  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... the basin is deep and the gradient is between 40 and 45 C/km. This geothermal low may be characterized by 1-4-1-6 [jical/cm2 sec except if ... is about 1*5 sec can bo considered as the Western boundary of the Hungarian geothermal anomaly, since heat flow diminishes from that line in the north-west direction to ...

T. BOLDIZSR

1964-06-27T23:59:59.000Z

369

CA, Coastal Region Onshore Proved Nonproducing Reserves  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

26 51 199 248 293 280 1996-2013 Lease Condensate (million bbls) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1998-2013 Total Gas (billion cu ft) 18 22 35 20 242 123 1996-2013 Nonassociated Gas (billion cu ft) 0 0...

370

Clay mineralogy of onshore UK Carboniferous mudrocks  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...structures, geochemistry and mineralogy (Wright et al., 1991) is that there was a climatic change from a predominantly dry-type monsoonal system to a strongly seasonal wet monsoonal-type climate. Under these conditions primary smectite was transformed...

D. A. SPEARS

371

Shale Natural Gas Estimated Production  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1,293 2,116 3,110 5,336 7,994 2007-2011 1,293 2,116 3,110 5,336 7,994 2007-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 2007-2011 Lower 48 States 1,293 2,116 3,110 5,336 7,994 2007-2011 Alabama 0 0 0 0 2007-2010 Arkansas 94 279 527 794 940 2007-2011 California 101 2011-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 101 2011-2011 Colorado 0 0 1 1 3 2007-2011 Kentucky 2 2 5 4 4 2007-2011 Louisiana 1 23 293 1,232 2,084 2007-2011 North 1 23 293 1,232 2,084 2007-2011 South Onshore 0 2011-2011 Michigan 148 122 132 120 106 2007-2011 Montana 12 13 7 13 13 2007-2011 New Mexico 2 0 2 6 9 2007-2011 East 2 0 1 3 5 2007-2011 West 0 0 1 3 4 2007-2011 North Dakota 3 3 25 64 95 2007-2011 Ohio 0 0 0 0 2007-2010 Oklahoma 40 168 249 403 476 2007-2011 Pennsylvania 1 1 65 396 1,068 2007-2011

372

Reactivation of an idle lease to increase heavy oil recovery through application of conventional steam drive technology in a low dip slope and basin reservoir in the Midway-Sunset field, San Joaquin basin, California. Quarterly report, January 1--March 31, 1996  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This project will reactivate ARCO`s idle Pru Fee lease in the Midway-Sunset field, California and conduct a continuous steamflood enhanced oil recovery demonstration aided by an integration of modern reservoir characterization and simulation methods. The objectives of the project are: (1) to return the shut-in portion of the reservoir to commercial production; (2) to accurately describe the reservoir and recovery process; and (3) convey the details of this activity to the domestic petroleum industry, especially to other producers in California, through an aggressive technology transfer program. The producibility problems initially thought to be responsible for the low recovery in the Pru Fee property are: (a) the shallow dip of the bedding; (b) complex reservoir structure, (c) thinning pay zone; and (d) the presence of bottom water. The project is using tight integration of reservoir characterization and simulation modeling to evaluate the magnitude of and alternative solutions to these problems. Two main activities were brought to completion during the first quarter of 1996: (1) lithologic and petrophysical description of the core taken form the new well Pru 101 near the center of the demonstration site and (2) development of a stratigraphic model for the Pru Fee project area. In addition, the first phase of baseline cyclic steaming of the Pru Fee demonstration site was continued with production tests and formation temperature monitoring.

Schamel, S.

1996-06-28T23:59:59.000Z

373

Reactivation of an idle lease to increase heavy oil recovery through application of conventional steam drive technology in a low dip slope and basin reservoir in the Midway-Sunset field, San Joaquin Basin, California. Quarterly report, June 14--September 30, 1995  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This project will reactivate ARCO`s idle Pru Fee lease in the Midway-Sunset field, California and conduct a continuous steamflood enhanced oil recovery demonstration aided by an integration of modern reservoir characterization and simulation methods. Cyclic steaming will be used to reestablish baseline production within the reservoir characterization phase of the project. During the demonstration phase, a continuous steamflood enhanced oil recover will be initiated to test the incremental value of this method as an alternative to cyclic steaming. Other economically marginal Class 3 reservoirs having similar producibility problems will benefit from insight gained in this project. The objectives of the project are: (1) to return the shut-in portion of the reservoir to commercial production; (2) to accurately describe the reservoir and recovery process; and (3) to convey the details of this activity to the domestic petroleum industry, especially to other producers in California, through an aggressive technology transfer program. A summary of technical progress discusses the literature compilation, assembly of digitized log suites, development of a stratigraphic framework, installation of lease production facilities, return wells to production, drill producer and observation wells, and reservoir characterization.

Schamel, S.

1995-12-19T23:59:59.000Z

374

Reactivation of an idle lease to increase heavy oil recovery through application of conventional steam drive technology in a low dip slope and basin reservoir in the Midway-Sunset field, San Joaquin Basin, California. [Quarterly report], June 14, 1995--September 30, 1995  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This project will reactivate ARCO`s idle Pru Fee lease in the Midway-Sunset field, California and conduct a continuous steamflood enhanced oil recovery demonstration aided by an integration of modern reservoir characterization and simulation methods. Cyclic steaming will be used to re-establish baseline production within the reservoir characterization phase of the project. During the demonstration phase, a continuous steamflood enhanced oil recover will be initiated to test the incremental value of this method as an alternative to cyclic steaming. Other economically marginal Class III reservoirs having similar producibility problems will benefit from insight gained in this project. The objectives of the project are: (1) to return the shut-in portion of the reservoir to commercial production; (2) to accurately describe the reservoir and recovery process; and (3) to convey the details of this activity to the domestic petroleum industry, especially to other producers in California, through an aggressive technology transfer program. A summary of technical progress covers: geological and reservoir characterization, and reservoir simulation.

Schamel, S.

1996-01-19T23:59:59.000Z

375

Targeting Of Potential Geothermal Resources In The Great Basin From  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Targeting Of Potential Geothermal Resources In The Great Basin From Targeting Of Potential Geothermal Resources In The Great Basin From Regional To Basin-Scale Relationship Between Geodetic Strain And Geological Structures Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Conference Paper: Targeting Of Potential Geothermal Resources In The Great Basin From Regional To Basin-Scale Relationship Between Geodetic Strain And Geological Structures Details Activities (9) Areas (3) Regions (0) Abstract: We apply a new method to target potential geothermal resources on the regional scale in the Great Basin by seeking relationships between geologic structures and GPS-geodetic observations of regional tectonic strain. First, we establish a theoretical basis for underst~dingh ow the rate of fracture opening can be related to the directional trend of faults

376

Northwest Basin and Range Geothermal Region | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Northwest Basin and Range Geothermal Region Northwest Basin and Range Geothermal Region Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Northwest Basin and Range Geothermal Region Details Areas (48) Power Plants (8) Projects (15) Techniques (33) The Basin and Range Province in northwestern Nevada and northeastern California is characterized by late Cretaceous - early Cenozoic regional erosion, Oligocene - Miocene volcanism, and subsequent late Miocene extension. Extensional faulting in northwestern Nevada began everywhere at 12 Ma and has continued up to the present. Faulting in the Warner Range in northeastern California can only be constrained to have begun between 14 and 3 Ma, but may represent westward migration of Basin and Range extension during the Pliocene. Compared to the many parts of the Basin and Range in

377

Geochemical characterization of geothermal systems in the Great Basin:  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

characterization of geothermal systems in the Great Basin: characterization of geothermal systems in the Great Basin: Implications for exploration, exploitation, and environmental issues Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Conference Paper: Geochemical characterization of geothermal systems in the Great Basin: Implications for exploration, exploitation, and environmental issues Details Activities (0) Areas (0) Regions (0) Abstract: The objective of this ongoing project is the development of a representative geochemical database for a comprehensive range of elemental and isotopic parameters (i.e., beyond the typical data suite) for a range of geothermal systems in the Great Basin. Development of this database is one of the first steps in understanding the nature of geothermal systems in the Great Basin. Of particular importance in the Great Basin is utilizing

378

CRAD, Emergency Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of River Protection K Basin Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD, Emergency Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System May 2004 A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May 2004 assessment of the Emergency Management program at the Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, Emergency Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System More Documents & Publications CRAD, Engineering - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System

379

River Basins Advisory Commissions (South Carolina) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

River Basins Advisory Commissions (South Carolina) River Basins Advisory Commissions (South Carolina) River Basins Advisory Commissions (South Carolina) < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Fed. Government Fuel Distributor General Public/Consumer Industrial Installer/Contractor Institutional Investor-Owned Utility Local Government Low-Income Residential Multi-Family Residential Municipal/Public Utility Nonprofit Residential Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative Schools State/Provincial Govt Systems Integrator Transportation Tribal Government Utility Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State South Carolina Program Type Environmental Regulations Provider Catawba Wateree River Basin Advisory Commission

380

Gravity modeling of Cenozoic extensional basins, offshore Vietnam  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. . . 78 . . . 81 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Southeast Asian study area location map 2 Major tectonic features of Southeast Asia 3 Mekong basin sediment isopach map . 4 Mekong basin generalized stratigraphy . Page . . . . 1 0 5 Mekong basin... gravity model 2 17 Mekong 2D forward gravity model 3 18 Mekong 2D forward gravity model 4 19 Mekong 2D forward gravity model 5 32 34 . . . 35 . . . 36 Page 20 Schematic 3D forward gravity model of Yinggehai basin sediment . . . 21 3D forward...

Mauri, Steven Joseph

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "joaquin basin onshore" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Contemporary Tectonic Deformation of the Basin and Range Province...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Journal Article: Contemporary Tectonic Deformation of the Basin and Range Province, Western United States: 10 Years of Observation with the Global Positioning System Abstract...

382

Coalbed methane production potential in U. S. basins  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The major emphasis of the U.S. DOE's coalbed methane research has been on estimating the magnitude of the resource and developing systems for recovery. Methane resource estimates for 16 basins show that the greatest potential is in the Piceance, Northern Appalachian, Central Appalachian, Powder River, and Greater Green River coal basins. Small, high-potential target areas have been selected for in-depth analysis of the resource. Industry interest is greatest in the Warrior, San Juan, Piceance, Raton Mesa, and Northern and Central Appalachian basins. Production curves for several coalbed methane wells in these basins are included.

Byer, C.W.; Mroz, T.H.; Covatch, G.L.

1987-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

383

Oregon Willamette River Basin Mitigation Agreement | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Willamette River Basin Mitigation Agreement Author State of Oregon Recipient Bonneville Power Administration Published Publisher Not Provided, 10222010 DOI Not Provided Check for...

384

Minturn Formation of Eagle basin: an exploration frontier  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Eagle basin, a predominantly Desmoinesian evaporite basin in northwestern Colorado, contains many targets for oil and gas reserves. Facies patterns of the Minturn Formation of the Eagle basin are strikingly similar to those of the prolific Paradox Formation of the Paradox basin. Both basins and formations also contain lens-shaped carbonate algal-bioherms. These algal-bioherms are particularly attractive reservoirs where they flank halite-basin margins, the areas of optimum dolomitization. The Minturn formation has been subdivided into individual rock packages using subsurface control. Facies maps constructed for individual units indicate the Eagle basin is a series of smaller basins, each having served as a center for halite deposition. Data support a deep-water model for the deposition of halite; however, a sabkhalike environment existed between the halite basins and the normal marine facies. Halite depocenters appear to have been structurally controlled. The Minturn Formation is very thick and may contain multiple prospective zones at any one location. Within the past year, two and possibly three Minturn discoveries have been made in northwestern Colorado.

Dodge, C.J.N.; Bartleson, B.

1986-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

385

COAL QUALITY AND GEOCHEMISTRY, POWDER RIVER BASIN, WYOMING AND MONTANA  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

in the Powder River Basin in Wyoming and Montana (fig. PQ-1) is considered to be "clean coal." For the location

386

Geographic Information System At Northern Basin & Range Region...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Exploration Activity: Geographic Information System At Northern Basin & Range Region (Coolbaugh, Et Al., 2005 - 2) Exploration...

387

Geology of the Douala basin, offshore Cameroon, West Africa  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Douala basin is predominantly an offshore basin extending from the Cameroon volcanic line in the north to the Corisco arch in the south near the Equatorial Guinea-Gabon border. The basin lies wholly within the territorial borders of Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea. The Douala basin is one of a series of divergent margin basins occurring along the southwest African coastline resulting from the rifting of Africa from South America. Continental rifting in the Doula basin was initiated at least by Aptian-Albian time and possibly as early as Jurassic. The rift stage persisted until Albian time when the onset of drifting occurred. The sedimentary section in the basin has a maximum thickness of 8-10 km, based on exploration drilling and gravity and magnetics modeling. The synrift section consists of Aptian-Albian sands and shales, deposited primarily as submarine fans, fan-deltas, and turbidite deposits. These are overlain by salt, thought to be equivalent to the Ezagna salt of Aptian age in the Gabon basin to the south. The synrift section is separated from the overlying postrift shale sequence of Late Cretaceous and Tertiary age by a major late Albian unconformity. The Douala basin has been explored for hydrocarbons intermittently over the last 25 years. Results show a distinct tendency for gas-proneness. The largest field recorded to date is the Sanaga Sud gas field, discovered in 1979, offshore, near the coastal city of Kribi.

Pauken, R.J.; Thompson, J.M.; Schumann, J.R. (Mobil New Exploration Ventures Co., Dallas, TX (United States)); Cooke, J.C. (Mobil Exploration and Production Services Inc., Dallas, TX (United States))

1991-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

388

Field Mapping At Northern Basin & Range Region (Blewitt Et Al...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Blewitt Et Al, 2005) Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Exploration Activity: Field Mapping At Northern Basin & Range Region (Blewitt Et Al, 2005)...

389

ALUMINUM DISTRIBUTIONSIN THE EURASIAN BASIN OF THE ARCTIC OCEAN  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ALUMINUM DISTRIBUTIONSIN THE EURASIAN BASIN OF THE ARCTIC OCEAN A THESISSUBMITTEDTO THE GRADUATE Section(1994)cruiseswere analyzed for their aluminum (Al) content; these two data setswere then combined

Luther, Douglas S.

390

Data Acquisition-Manipulation At Nw Basin & Range Region (Blackwell...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

References D. D. Blackwell, K. W. Wisian, M. C. Richards, Mark Leidig, Richard Smith, Jason McKenna (2003) Geothermal Resource Analysis And Structure Of Basin And Range...

391

Data Acquisition-Manipulation At Northern Basin & Range Region...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

References D. D. Blackwell, K. W. Wisian, M. C. Richards, Mark Leidig, Richard Smith, Jason McKenna (2003) Geothermal Resource Analysis And Structure Of Basin And Range...

392

The dynamics and physical processes of the Comoros Basin.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??Includes abstract. The main objective of this thesis was to investigate the circulation in the ComorosBasin using observed and model datasets. These data were used (more)

Collins, Charine

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

393

Geographic Information System At Nw Basin & Range Region (Coolbaugh...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

David Blackwell, Gary Oppliger (2005) A Map Of Geothermal Potential For The Great Basin, Usa- Recognition Of Multiple Geothermal Environments Additional References Retrieved from...

394

Data Acquisition-Manipulation At Northern Basin & Range Region...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

David Blackwell, Gary Oppliger (2005) A Map Of Geothermal Potential For The Great Basin, Usa- Recognition Of Multiple Geothermal Environments Additional References Retrieved from...

395

Modeling-Computer Simulations At Northern Basin & Range Region...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Unknown References Glenn Biasi, Leiph Preston, Ileana Tibuleac (2009) Body Wave Tomography For Regional Scale Assessment Of Geothermal Indicators In The Western Great Basin...

396

Teleseismic-Seismic Monitoring At Northern Basin & Range Region...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Unknown References Glenn Biasi, Leiph Preston, Ileana Tibuleac (2009) Body Wave Tomography For Regional Scale Assessment Of Geothermal Indicators In The Western Great Basin...

397

Teleseismic-Seismic Monitoring At Nw Basin & Range Region (Biasi...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Unknown References Glenn Biasi, Leiph Preston, Ileana Tibuleac (2009) Body Wave Tomography For Regional Scale Assessment Of Geothermal Indicators In The Western Great Basin...

398

Modeling-Computer Simulations At Nw Basin & Range Region (Biasi...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Unknown References Glenn Biasi, Leiph Preston, Ileana Tibuleac (2009) Body Wave Tomography For Regional Scale Assessment Of Geothermal Indicators In The Western Great Basin...

399

E-Print Network 3.0 - austrian molasse basin Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

basin Page: << < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 1 The El Mayah molasse basin in the Eastern Desert of Egypt A. Shalaby a,b,*, K. Stuwe a,*, H. Fritz a Summary: The El Mayah molasse basin in the...

400

Late Palaeozoic Basins of the Southern U.S. Continental Interior [Abstract] [and Discussion  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

5 May 1982 research-article Late Palaeozoic Basins of the Southern U.S. Continental Interior [Abstract] [and Discussion] J. F. Dewey W...georef;1985006010 basins economic geology energy sources folds intracratonic basins Paleozoic...

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "joaquin basin onshore" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Basin Analysis and Petroleum System Characterization and Modeling, Interior Salt Basins, Central and Eastern Gulf of Mexico  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The principal research effort for Year 3 of the project is basin modeling and petroleum system identification, comparative basin evaluation and resource assessment. In the first six (6) months of Year 3, the research focus is on basin modeling and petroleum system identification and the remainder of the year the emphasis is on the comparative basin evaluation and resource assessment. No major problems have been encountered to date, and the project is on schedule. The principal objectives of the project are to develop through basin analysis and modeling the concept that petroleum systems acting in a basin can be identified through basin modeling and to demonstrate that the information and analysis resulting from characterizing and modeling of these petroleum systems in the North Louisiana Salt Basin and the Mississippi Interior Salt Basin can be used in providing a more reliable and advanced approach for targeting stratigraphic traps and specific reservoir facies within a geologic system and in providing a refined assessment of undiscovered and underdeveloped reservoirs and associated oil and gas resources.

Ernest A. Mancini; Paul Aharon; Donald A. Goddard; Roger Barnaby

2006-02-28T23:59:59.000Z

402

Seismic interpretation, distribution, and basin modelling of natural gas leakage in block 2 of the Orange Basin, offshore South Africa.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??Includes abstract. The aims of this study are to: (1) characterize different natural gas leakage features present throughout the basin, and (2) understand the relationship (more)

Boyd, Donna Louise.

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

403

Estimating tectonic history through basin simulation-enhanced seismic inversion: geoinfomatics for sedimentary basins  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......processes in response to geothermal gradient in much greater...approach not only reduces costs by integrating the basin...terms of temperature, energy, and with the probability...accepting a change in energy given through Boltzmann...proceeded in our choice of geothermal gradients (coarser......

Kush Tandon; Kagan Tuncay; Kyle Hubbard; John Comer; Peter Ortoleva

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

404

Evolution and hydrocarbon prospectivity of the Douala Basin, Cameroon  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Douala Basin is a stable Atlantic-type, predominantly offshore basin and forms the northern terminal of a series of divergent passive margin basins located on the Southwest coast of Africa that resulted from the rifting of Africa from South America. An integration of new studies including detailed well, biostratigraphic, sedimentological, geochemical and seismic data has confirmed that the tectonostratigraphic evolution in the basin can be broadly divided into three developmental phases: the Syn-rift, Transitional and Drift phases. This basis has been explored intermittently for hydrocarbon for the past 40 years with two important gas fields discovered and no commercial oil found as yet. This early gas discovery and a corresponding lack of any significant oil discovery, led early operators to term this basin as essentially a gas province. However, recent geochemical analyses of various oil-seeps and oil samples from various localities in the basin, using state-of-the-art techniques have demonstrated that this basin is a potential oil prone basin. The results show that two models of oil sourcing are possible: a Lower Cretaceous lacustrine saline source, similar to the presalt basins of Gabon or a marine Upper Cretaceous to lower Tertiary source, similar to the neighbouring Rio del Rey/Niger Delta Complex. Additionally, seismic reflection data also demonstrate a variety of reservoir horizons, including submarine fans, channel-like features and buried paleohighs, all interbedded within regionally extensive, uniformity bounded mudstone units. Hence, it is now quite evident that within this basin, there exist a vast potential for a wide variety of stratigraphic, structural and combined traps. These features, which are considered to have significantly enhanced the prospectivity of this basin, will be discussed in this paper.

Batupe, M.; Tampu, S.; Aboma, R.S. [National Hydrocarbons Corporation, Yaounde (Cameroon)

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

405

Supai salt karst features: Holbrook Basin, Arizona  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

More than 300 sinkholes, fissures, depressions, and other collapse features occur along a 70 km (45 mi) dissolution front of the Permian Supai Formation, dipping northward into the Holbrook Basin, also called the Supai Salt Basin. The dissolution front is essentially coincident with the so-called Holbrook Anticline showing local dip reversal; rather than being of tectonic origin, this feature is likely a subsidence-induced monoclinal flexure caused by the northward migrating dissolution front. Three major areas are identified with distinctive attributes: (1) The Sinks, 10 km WNW of Snowflake, containing some 200 sinkholes up to 200 m diameter and 50 m depth, and joint controlled fissures and fissure-sinks; (2) Dry Lake Valley and contiguous areas containing large collapse fissures and sinkholes in jointed Coconino sandstone, some of which drained more than 50 acre-feet ({approximately}6 {times} 10{sup 4} m{sup 3}) of water overnight; and (3) the McCauley Sinks, a localized group of about 40 sinkholes 15 km SE of Winslow along Chevelon Creek, some showing essentially rectangular jointing in the surficial Coconino Formation. Similar salt karst features also occur between these three major areas. The range of features in Supai salt are distinctive, yet similar to those in other evaporate basins. The wide variety of dissolution/collapse features range in development from incipient surface expression to mature and old age. The features began forming at least by Pliocene time and continue to the present, with recent changes reportedly observed and verified on airphotos with 20 year repetition. The evaporate sequence along interstate transportation routes creates a strategic location for underground LPG storage in leached caverns. The existing 11 cavern field at Adamana is safely located about 25 miles away from the dissolution front, but further expansion initiatives will require thorough engineering evaluation.

Neal, J.T.

1994-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

406

Devonian shale gas resource assessment, Illinois basin  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In 1980 the National Petroleum Council published a resource appraisal for Devonian shales in the Appalachian, Michigan, and Illinois basins. Their Illinois basin estimate of 86 TCFG in-place has been widely cited but never verified nor revised. The NPC estimate was based on extremely limited canister off-gas data, used a highly simplified volumetric computation, and is not useful for targeting specific areas for gas exploration. In 1994 we collected, digitized, and normalized 187 representative gamma ray-bulk density logs through the New Albany across the entire basin. Formulas were derived from core analyses and methane adsorption isotherms to estimate total organic carbon (r{sup 2}=0.95) and gas content (r{sup 2}=0.79-0.91) from shale bulk density. Total gas in place was then calculated foot-by-foot through each well, assuming normal hydrostatic pressures and assuming the shale is gas saturated at reservoir conditions. The values thus determined are similar to peak gas contents determined by canister off-gassing of fresh cores but are substantially greater than average off-gas values. Greatest error in the methodology is at low reservoir pressures (or at shallow depths), however, the shale is generally thinner in these areas so the impact on the total resource estimate is small. The total New Albany gas in place was determined by integration to be 323 TCFG. Of this, 210 TCF (67%) is in the upper black Grassy Creek Shale, 72 TCF (23%) in the middle black and gray Selmier Shale, and 31 TCF (10%) in the basal black Blocher Shale. Water production concerns suggest that only the Grassy Creek Shale is likely to be commercially exploitable.

Cluff, R.M.; Cluff, S.G.; Murphy, C.M. [Discovery Group, Inc., Denver, CO (United States)

1996-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

407

Devonian shale gas resource assessment, Illinois basin  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In 1980 the National Petroleum Council published a resource appraisal for Devonian shales in the Appalachian, Michigan, and Illinois basins. Their Illinois basin estimate of 86 TCFG in-place has been widely cited but never verified nor revised. The NPC estimate was based on extremely limited canister off-gas data, used a highly simplified volumetric computation, and is not useful for targeting specific areas for gas exploration. In 1994 we collected, digitized, and normalized 187 representative gamma ray-bulk density logs through the New Albany across the entire basin. Formulas were derived from core analyses and methane adsorption isotherms to estimate total organic carbon (r[sup 2]=0.95) and gas content (r[sup 2]=0.79-0.91) from shale bulk density. Total gas in place was then calculated foot-by-foot through each well, assuming normal hydrostatic pressures and assuming the shale is gas saturated at reservoir conditions. The values thus determined are similar to peak gas contents determined by canister off-gassing of fresh cores but are substantially greater than average off-gas values. Greatest error in the methodology is at low reservoir pressures (or at shallow depths), however, the shale is generally thinner in these areas so the impact on the total resource estimate is small. The total New Albany gas in place was determined by integration to be 323 TCFG. Of this, 210 TCF (67%) is in the upper black Grassy Creek Shale, 72 TCF (23%) in the middle black and gray Selmier Shale, and 31 TCF (10%) in the basal black Blocher Shale. Water production concerns suggest that only the Grassy Creek Shale is likely to be commercially exploitable.

Cluff, R.M.; Cluff, S.G.; Murphy, C.M. (Discovery Group, Inc., Denver, CO (United States))

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

408

HANFORD K BASINS SLUDGE RETREIVAL & TREATMENT  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper shows how Fluor Hanford and BNG America have combined nuclear plant skills from the US and the UK to devise methods to retrieve and treat the sludge that has accumulated in K Basins at the Hanford site over many years. Retrieving the sludge is the final stage in removing fuel and sludge from the basins to allow them to be decontaminated and decommissioned, thus removing the threat of contamination of the Columbia River. A description is given of sludge retrieval using vacuum lances and specially developed nozzles and pumps into Consolidation Containers within the basins. The special attention that had to be paid to the heat generation and potential criticality issues with the irradiated uranium-containing sludge is described. The processes developed to re-mobilize the sludge from the Consolidation Containers and pump it through flexible and transportable hose-in-hose piping to the treatment facility are explained with particular note made of dealing with the abrasive nature of the sludge. The treatment facility, housed in an existing Hanford building is described, and the uranium-corrosion and grout encapsulation processes explained. The uranium corrosion process is a robust, tempered process very suitable for dealing with a range of differing sludge compositions. The grout process to produce the final waste form is backed by BNG America's 20 years experience of grouting radioactive waste at Sellafield and elsewhere. The use of transportable and re-usable equipment is emphasized and its role noted in avoiding new plant build that itself will require cleanup. The processes and techniques described in the paper are shown to have wide applicability to nuclear cleanup worldwide.

VASQUEZ, D.A.

2005-07-05T23:59:59.000Z

409

Baroclinic tides in an axially symmetric basin  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Energetics Returning to the governing equations (66) through (6&7) and multiplving (66) by phu?, (66) by phv?, and (67) by php?gives the result; phu?? f v?~ ? ~ ~ p S? m=O 0(, = phu?g h?o, c3 T f&hv?g o'j r SH (96) (96) aud ap? 1 a I au? I ~ ah.... Rowe (Head of Department) December 1989 ABSTRACT Baroclinic Tides in an Axially Symmetric Basin. (December 1989) Edward Paul Dever. B. S. , Texas Ag-XI University Chair ol' Advisory Committee: Prof. Robert 0. Reid A. coupled normal mode model...

Dever, Edward Paul

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

410

Driver and Pedestrian Behavior at Uncontrolled Crosswalks in the Tahoe Basin Recreation Area  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

in the Tahoe Basin Recreation Area Meghan Fehlig Mitman,in the Tahoe Basin Recreation Area Submission Date: Augusttraverses rural and/or recreation areas, the findings from

Mitman, Meghan Fehlig; Cooper, Douglas; DuBose, Brooke

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

411

E-Print Network 3.0 - active single basin Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

basins... ) existed during the Late Oligocene and Miocene when the rift basins of Thailand were active because active... into three main areas and tec- tonic provinces: 1)...

412

The Persian Gulf Basin: Geological history, sedimentary formations, and petroleum potential  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The Persian Gulf Basin is the richest region of the ... Foredeep, which is a member of the Persian Gulf Basin. During the most part of the...

A. I. Konyuhov; B. Maleki

413

Screening model optimization for Panay River Basin planning in the Philippines .  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??The state of the water resources of the Panay River Basin have motivated studies and initial basin planning to mitigate flood damages, to produce hydroelectricity, (more)

Millspaugh, John Henry

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

414

E-Print Network 3.0 - african river basin Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 1 Adaptation to climate change in international river basins in Africa: a review* Summary: ). There are 60 international river basins within the African...

415

ADCP-Referenced Geostrophic Circulation in the Bering Sea Basin  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A month-long circumnavigation of the Bering Sea basin in August 1991 was designed to study the basin-scale circulation. For the first time in this region vessel-mounted acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) measurements provided an absolute ...

E. D. Cokelet; M. L. Schall; D. M. Dougherty

1996-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

416

Hydrocarbons in rift basins: the role of stratigraphy  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...succession that causes the shales to reach thermal maturity and generate hydrocarbons. Simple...T. J. 1988 Rift basins of interior Sudan--petroleum exploration and discovery...basins? Is that what we could call the thermal subsidence phase? J. J. Lambiase...

1999-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

417

Origin Basin Destination State STB EIA STB EIA Northern Appalachian...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

- W - W W W - W Central Appalachian Basin Alabama 26.18 26.10 -0.3% 118.06 22.1% 930 37.4% 100.0% Central Appalachian Basin Delaware 23.73 15.12 -36.3% 88.59 17.1%...

418

Social learning among Congo Basin huntergatherers  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...Kevin N. Laland Social learning among Congo Basin hunter-gatherers Barry S. Hewlett...Central African Republic and Republic of Congo. We have conducted several years of qualitative...daily life and demographic features of Congo Basin hunter-gatherers and farmers...

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

419

Congo Basin rainfall climatology: can we believe the climate models?  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...Asare, Simon Lewis and Philippe Mayaux Congo Basin rainfall climatology: can we believe...rainforests: past, present and future . The Congo Basin is one of three key convective regions...rainfall products and climate models. Congo rainfall|climatology|moisture flux...

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

420

Microbial Biomass and Activity Distribution in an Anoxic, Hypersaline Basin  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...the northern Gulf of Mexico with anoxic conditions...the northern Gulf of Mexico with anoxic conditions...basin in the Gulf of Mexico. The Orca Basin, as...Table 1 is a result of geothermal heat brought into the...sulfate-reducing as well as sulfide-oxidizing...

Paul A. LaRock; Ray D. Lauer; John R. Schwarz; Kathleen K. Watanabe; Denis A. Wiesenburg

1979-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "joaquin basin onshore" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

THE HISTORICAL YOLO BASIN What parts make the whole?  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

THE HISTORICAL YOLO BASIN LANDSCAPE What parts make the whole? Alison Whipple San Francisco Estuary The spatial and temporal variability of the Delta reflected fluvial-tidal interaction #12;YOLO BASIN NORTHEAST prevalent at the north end and along Miner Slough..." - Mellin 1918 North End Liberty Island Yolo By Pass

422

California basin study (CaBS)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Previous studies of geochemical recycling processes in the upper water column in the Southern California Bight focused on the seasonal cycle. Inspection of satellite sea surface color images as well as information from studies in other areas suggest that the cycling processes have significant variability on time scales of hours and days. To allow our seasonal studies to be examined in the context of the higher frequency variability, an interdisciplinary mooring was maintained near the midpoint of Santa Monica basin (known as station 305) from January to July, 1990. The Hickey group had the primary responsibility of deploying and recovering the mooring. The mooring consisted of a vector measuring wind recorder mounted above a toroidal buoy, below which were suspended two current/temperature recorders, a trnasmissometer, and two PAR sensors. The PAR sensors, which provide an estimate of phytoplankton growth rates, were deployed as part of the Trees proposal. At two additional nearby moorings, sediment traps were deployed at selected depths throughout the water column by Landry and by Soutar. To allow some investigation of lateral advection of material, current meters were deployed at the same depths as several of the sediment traps both at this site and also at the site farther along the basin axis. The data from these experiments have not yet been processed. 6 refs., 10 figs.

Hickey, B.M.

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

423

Shale Gas Development in the Susquehanna River Basin  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Water Resource Challenges Water Resource Challenges From Energy Production Major Types of Power Generation in SRB - Total 15,300 Megawatts - 37.5% 4.0% 12.0% 15.5% 31.0% Nuclear Coal Natural Gas Hydroelectric Other Marcellus Shale Gas Development in the Susquehanna River Basin The Basin: * 27,510-square-mile watershed * Comprises 43 percent of the Chesapeake Bay watershed * 4.2 million population * 60 percent forested * 32,000+ miles of waterways The Susquehanna River: * 444 miles, largest tributary to the Chesapeake Bay * Supplies 18 million gallons a minute to the Bay Susquehanna River Basin Geographic Location of Marcellus Shale within Susq. River Basin 72% of Basin (20,000 Sq. Miles) Underlain by Marcellus Shale Approximate Amount of Natural Gas in Marcellus Shale * U.S. currently produces approx. 30 trillion

424

Independent Oversight Review, Hanford K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

K Basin and Cold Vacuum K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying Facility - August 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Hanford K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying Facility - August 2012 August 2012 Review of Hanford K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying Facility Found Fuel Multi-Canister Overpack Operations The purpose of this independent oversight review by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) was to observe the operations associated with processing a Multi-Canister Overpack (MCO) of "found fuel" (small quantities of spent fuel discovered during cleanup of the reactor burial grounds) at the Cold Vacuum Drying Facility (CVDF). The found fuel MCO was transported from the K West Basin on the Hanford

425

Independent Oversight Review, Hanford K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Hanford K Basin and Cold Vacuum Hanford K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying Facility - August 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Hanford K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying Facility - August 2012 August 2012 Review of Hanford K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying Facility Found Fuel Multi-Canister Overpack Operations The purpose of this independent oversight review by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) was to observe the operations associated with processing a Multi-Canister Overpack (MCO) of "found fuel" (small quantities of spent fuel discovered during cleanup of the reactor burial grounds) at the Cold Vacuum Drying Facility (CVDF). The found fuel MCO was transported from the K West Basin on the Hanford

426

Numerical Modeling of Transient Basin and Range Extensional Geothermal  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Transient Basin and Range Extensional Geothermal Transient Basin and Range Extensional Geothermal Systems Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Conference Paper: Numerical Modeling of Transient Basin and Range Extensional Geothermal Systems Abstract A suite of models utilizing a range of bulkrock permeabilities were developed to analyze thetransient behavior of basin and range extensionalgeothermal systems, and particularly, the evolution ofthe system temperature with time. Each modelconsists of two mountain ranges (~1 km relief fromthe valley floor) separated by a thick sequence (about4 km) of clastic sediments derived from the adjacentranges, and a relatively permeable, high angle faultthat functions as a conduit for subsurface fluids. Thisgeometry is typical of Basin and Range extensionalsystems.We

427

EA-1173: Grande Ronde Basin Endemic Spring Chinook Salmon Supplemental  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3: Grande Ronde Basin Endemic Spring Chinook Salmon 3: Grande Ronde Basin Endemic Spring Chinook Salmon Supplemental Program (Preliminary), Oregon EA-1173: Grande Ronde Basin Endemic Spring Chinook Salmon Supplemental Program (Preliminary), Oregon SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts for the U.S. Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration's proposal to fund a program designed to prevent the extinction and begin the recovery of spring Chinook salmon stocks in the Grande Ronde River Basin in the Upper Grande Ronde River, Lostine River, and Catherine Creek in Northeastern Oregon. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD December 18, 2003 EA-1173-SA-01: Supplement Analysis Grande Ronde Basin Endemic Spring Chinook Salmon Supplementation Program

428

Geothermal Reservoir Assessment Case Study, Northern Basin and Range  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Reservoir Assessment Case Study, Northern Basin and Range Reservoir Assessment Case Study, Northern Basin and Range Province, Northern Dixie Valley, Nevada Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Report: Geothermal Reservoir Assessment Case Study, Northern Basin and Range Province, Northern Dixie Valley, Nevada Abstract N/A Authors Elaine J. Bell, Lawrence T. Larson and Russell W. Juncal Published U.S. Department of Energy, 1980 Report Number GLO2386 DOI Not Provided Check for DOI availability: http://crossref.org Online Internet link for Geothermal Reservoir Assessment Case Study, Northern Basin and Range Province, Northern Dixie Valley, Nevada Citation Elaine J. Bell,Lawrence T. Larson,Russell W. Juncal. 1980. Geothermal Reservoir Assessment Case Study, Northern Basin and Range Province,

429

Accomplishments At The Great Basin Center For Geothermal Energy | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Accomplishments At The Great Basin Center For Geothermal Energy Accomplishments At The Great Basin Center For Geothermal Energy Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Conference Paper: Accomplishments At The Great Basin Center For Geothermal Energy Details Activities (0) Areas (0) Regions (0) Abstract: The Great Basin Center for Geothermal Energy (GBCGE) has been funded by DOE since March 2002 to conduct geothermal resource exploration and assessment in the Great Basin. In that time, those efforts have led to significant advances in understanding the regional and local conditions necessary for the formation of geothermal systems. Accomplishments include the development of GPS-based crustal strain rate measurements as a geothermal exploration tool, development of new methods of detecting geothermal features with remotely sensed imagery, and the detection of

430

Relating Geothermal Resources To Great Basin Tectonics Using Gps | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Relating Geothermal Resources To Great Basin Tectonics Using Gps Relating Geothermal Resources To Great Basin Tectonics Using Gps Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Conference Paper: Relating Geothermal Resources To Great Basin Tectonics Using Gps Details Activities (8) Areas (4) Regions (0) Abstract: The Great Basin is characterized by non-magmatic geothermal fields, which we hypothesize are created, sustained, and controlled by active tectonics. In the Great Basin, GPS-measured rates of tectonic "transtensional" (shear plus dilatational) strain rate is correlated with geothermal well temperatures and the locations of known geothermal fields. This has led to a conceptual model in which non-magmatic geothermal systems are controlled by the style of strain, where shear (strike-slip faulting)

431

Corrosion of aluminum alloys in a reactor disassembly basin  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document discusses storage of aluminum clad fuel and target tubes of the Mark 22 assembly takes place in the concrete-lined, light-water-filled, disassembly basins located within each reactor area at the Savannah River Site (SRS). A corrosion test program has been conducted in the K-Reactor disassembly basin to assess the storage performance of the assemblies and other aluminum clad components in the current basin environment. Aluminum clad alloys cut from the ends of actual fuel and target tubes were originally placed in the disassembly water basin in December 1991. After time intervals varying from 45--182 days, the components were removed from the basin, photographed, and evaluated metallographically for corrosion performance. Results indicated that pitting of the 8001 aluminum fuel clad alloy exceeded the 30-mil (0.076 cm) cladding thickness within the 45-day exposure period. Pitting of the 1100 aluminum target clad alloy exceeded the 30-mil (0.076 cm) clad thickness in 107--182 days exposure. The existing basin water chemistry is within limits established during early site operations. Impurities such as Cl{sup {minus}}, NO{sub 3}{sup {minus}} and SO{sub 4}{sup {minus}} are controlled to the parts per million level and basin water conductivity is currently 170--190 {mu}mho/cm. The test program has demonstrated that the basin water is aggressive to the aluminum components at these levels. Other storage basins at SRS and around the US have successfully stored aluminum components for greater than ten years without pitting corrosion. These basins have impurity levels controlled to the parts per billion level (1000X lower) and conductivity less than 1.0 {mu}mho/cm.

Howell, J.P.; Zapp, P.E.; Nelson, D.Z.

1992-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

432

Basin configuration and depositional trends in the Mission Canyon and Ratcliffe beds, U.S. portion of the Williston basin  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Construction of Mission Canyon and Ratcliffe depositional trends utilizing shoreline models and anhydrite edge maps shows a significant change in basin configuration associated with regional sea level changes. Sea level highstand, which began during deposition of the Scallion member of the Lodgepole Formation, was punctuated by two lowstand events. The first occurred during deposition of the MC-2 anhydrite (Tilston). During this lowstand event, the width of the carbonate basin decreased significantly. With sea level rise, a broad basin formed with carbonate and evaporate ramp deposition (Lands, Wayne, Glenburn and Mohall members). The top of the Mohall contains evidence of the second lowstand event. This event introduced quartz sand detritus into the basin (Kisbey Sandstone). Because of sea level lowstand, Sherwood and younger Mission Canyon beds were deposited during highstand in a narrower carbonate basin. Funneling of marine currents and tides in this basin created higher energy shoreline and shoal deposits than those commonly found in older Mission Canyon sediments. The top of the Mission Canyon (Rival) was capped by a deepening event or transgression which enlarged the basin and created broad Ratcliffe ramp systems similar to those that existed during Glenburn and Mohall deposition. By utilizing sequence stratigraphy and mapping shoreline trends and basin configuration, reservoir and trap geometries are identified, and exploration success is improved.

Hendricks, M.L. [Hendricks and Associates, Inc., Englewood, CO (United States)

1996-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

433

DOE West Coast Basin program, California Basin Study: Progress report 4, (July 1986-June 1987)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The overall objective of our research is to understand the transport pathways and mass balances of selected metabolically active and inactive chemical species in the Santa Monica/San Pedro Basins. One focus is to examine the role of zooplankton and micronekton in the cycling and remineralization of chemical materials in the Southern California Bight, with particular reference to C, N and certain radionuclides and trace metals. A second focus is to examine these same radionuclides and trace metals in other reservoirs besides the zooplankton (i.e., in seawater, sediment trap material and bottom sediments). Knowledge of the rates, routes and reservoirs of these nuclides and metals should lead to a cogent model for these elements in Santa Monica/San Pedro Basins. 28 refs., 13 figs., 7 tabs.

Small, L.F.; Huh, Chih-An

1987-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

434

Carderock Maneuvering & Seakeeping Basin | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Maneuvering & Seakeeping Basin Maneuvering & Seakeeping Basin Jump to: navigation, search Basic Specifications Facility Name Carderock Maneuvering & Seakeeping Basin Overseeing Organization United States Naval Surface Warfare Center Hydrodynamic Testing Facility Type Wave Basin Length(m) 109.7 Beam(m) 73.2 Depth(m) 6.1 Water Type Freshwater Cost(per day) Contact POC Special Physical Features 10.7m deep x 15.2m wide trench along length of tank; the Maneuvering & Seakeeping Basin is spanned lengthwise by a 114.6m bridge supported on a rail system that permits the bridge to traverse one-half the width of the basin and to rotate through angles up to 45 degrees from the longitudinal centerline of the basin, ship models can be towed in head or following seas at any angle from 0 to 90 degrees, tracks attached to the bottom of the bridge support the towing carriage, bridge width is constant 6.1m.

435

Basin Analysis and Petroleum System Characterization and Modeling, Interior Salt Basins, Central and Eastern Gulf of Mexico  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The principal research effort for Phase 1 (Concept Development) of the project has been data compilation; determination of the tectonic, depositional, burial, and thermal maturation histories of the North Louisiana Salt Basin; basin modeling (geohistory, thermal maturation, hydrocarbon expulsion); petroleum system identification; comparative basin evaluation; and resource assessment. Existing information on the North Louisiana Salt Basin has been evaluated, an electronic database has been developed, and regional cross sections have been prepared. Structure, isopach and formation lithology maps have been constructed, and burial history, thermal maturation history, and hydrocarbon expulsion profiles have been prepared. Seismic data, cross sections, subsurface maps and burial history, thermal maturation history, and hydrocarbon expulsion profiles have been used in evaluating the tectonic, depositional, burial and thermal maturation histories of the basin. Oil and gas reservoirs have been found to be associated with salt-supported anticlinal and domal features (salt pillows, turtle structures and piercement domes); with normal faulting associated with the northern basin margin and listric down-to-the-basin faults (state-line fault complex) and faulted salt features; and with combination structural and stratigraphic features (Sabine and Monroe Uplifts) and monoclinal features with lithologic variations. Petroleum reservoirs include Upper Jurassic and Cretaceous fluvial-deltaic sandstone facies; shoreline, marine bar and shallow shelf sandstone facies; and carbonate shoal, shelf and reef facies. Cretaceous unconformities significantly contribute to the hydrocarbon trapping mechanism capacity in the North Louisiana Salt Basin. The chief petroleum source rock in this basin is Upper Jurassic Smackover lime mudstone beds. The generation of hydrocarbons from Smackover lime mudstone was initiated during the Early Cretaceous and continued into the Tertiary. Hydrocarbon expulsion commenced during the Early Cretaceous and continued into the Tertiary with peak expulsion occurring during the Early to Late Cretaceous. The geohistory of the North Louisiana Salt Basin is comparable to the Mississippi Interior Salt Basin with the major difference being the elevated heat flow the strata in the North Louisiana Salt Basin experienced in the Cretaceous due primarily to reactivation of upward movement, igneous activity, and erosion associated with the Monroe and Sabine Uplifts. Potential undiscovered reservoirs in the North Louisiana Salt Basin are Triassic Eagle Mills sandstone and deeply buried Upper Jurassic sandstone and limestone. Potential underdeveloped reservoirs include Lower Cretaceous sandstone and limestone and Upper Cretaceous sandstone.

Ernest A. Mancini; Paul Aharon; Donald A. Goddard; Roger Barnaby

2006-05-26T23:59:59.000Z

436

square-mile Black Warrior Basin  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

will inject CO will inject CO 2 into a coalbed methane (CBM) well in Tuscaloosa County, Alabama, to assess the capability of mature CBM reservoirs to receive and adsorb large volumes of CO 2 . Injection began at the test site on June 15; the site was selected because it is representative of the 23,000- square-mile Black Warrior Basin located in northwestern Alabama and northeastern Mississippi. It is estimated that this area has the potential to store in the range of 1.1 to 2.3 Gigatons of CO 2 , which is approximately the amount that Alabama's coal-fired power plants emit in two decades. The targeted coal seams range from 940 to 1,800 feet deep and are one to six feet thick. Approximately 240 tons of CO 2 will be injected over a 45- to 60-day period. More information

437

Petroleum well costs.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??This is the first academic study of well costs and drilling times for Australia??s petroleum producing basins, both onshore and offshore. I analyse a substantial (more)

Leamon, Gregory Robert

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

438

This Week In Petroleum Summary Printer-Friendly Version  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

in these key onshore basins and increasing productivity as companies learn how to apply hydraulic fracturing techniques more effectively and efficiently are central to STEO's...

439

Petroleum systems of the Southwest Caspian Basin  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Southwest Caspian Basin, located in offshore Azerbaijan, contains significant accumulations of oil and gas in Upper Tertiary siliciclastic sediments. The central basin contains up to 25 km of sediments. The relatively low geothermal gradients and low degree of compaction from rapid burial provide favorable conditions or the retention of hydrocarbons at relatively great depths. A variety of structural styles occur, ranging from anticlinal folds to monoclines, with various degrees of reverse faulting and brecciation. Molecular characterization of selected oil samples indicate most of the oils have been sourced form the same or similar facies; a Tertiary Type II, slightly calcareous, marine clastic facies. Insufficient organic-rich rocks are available for a reliable oil-source correlation. Examination of oil molecular characteristics, oil-oil correlations, molecular characteristics of key stratigraphic horizons, paleofacies maps, maturation, and potential migration pathways suggest the oil was not syngenetic but most likely sourced from deeper Oligo-Miocene or older marine shales. Compositional data for a single offshore gas sample suggest the gas is a mixture of low maturity Type III and biogenic. A multi-stage model of hydrocarbon emplacement for evolving structural traps has been postulated. The first phase of emplacement occurred in the Middle Pliocene when tectonic movement and significant subsidence initiated early trap/reservoir formation, migration, and hydrocarbon generation. Late Quaternary tectonic activity lead to the replenishment of older depleted traps, additional hydrocarbons for enhanced traps, and charging of new traps. In addition, late tectonic activity caused extensive redistribution of hydrocarbon accumulations, degassing due to breached faults, and destruction of selected oil pools.

Abrams, M.A.; Narimanov, A.A. [State Oil Company of Azerbaijan, Baku (Azerbaijan)

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

440

The Caribbean Basin: A prime market for renewables  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Countries in the Caribbean basin have high energy prices and need additional electrical generating capacity. Renewable energy and independent power sources could help meet that need. The Caribbean Basin and the Pacific Rim appear to offer the best total market opportunities considering government energy policies, prices of energy, and consumer attitudes on renewable energy applications. The Caribbean Basin was selected for an industry project opportunity review. This area was selected due to its proximity, renewable resource base, need for energy and growth, and potential for private and multidevelopment bank funding of projects. 3 figs.

Sklar, S.

1989-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "joaquin basin onshore" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Regional aquifers and petroleum in Williston Basin region of US  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

At least five major aquifers underlie the northern Great Plains of the US, which includes parts of the Williston basin in Montana and North Dakota. These aquifers form a hydrologic system that extends more than 960 km from recharge areas in the Rocky Mountains to discharge areas in eastern North Dakota and the Canadian Provinces of Manitoba and Saskatchewan. The regional flow system in the aquifers has had a major effect on the chemical composition of ground water within the Williston basin. Hydrodynamic forces may contribute to the accumulation of petroleum within the basin.

Downey, J.S.; Busby, J.F.; Dinwiddie, G.A.

1985-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

442

BASIN ANALYSIS AND PETROLEUM SYSTEM CHARACTERIZATION AND MODELING, INTERIOR SALT BASINS, CENTRAL AND EASTERN GULF OF MEXICO  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The principal research effort for Year 1 of the project is data compilation and the determination of the tectonic and depositional histories of the North Louisiana Salt Basin. In the first three (3) to six (6) months of Year 1, the research focus is on data compilation and the remainder of the year the emphasis is on the tectonic and depositional histories of the basin. No major problems have been encountered to date, and the project is on schedule. The principal objectives of the project are to develop through basin analysis and modeling the concept that petroleum systems acting in a basin can be identified through basin modeling and to demonstrate that the information and analysis resulting from characterizing and modeling of these petroleum systems in the North Louisiana Salt Basin and the Mississippi Interior Salt Basin can be used in providing a more reliable and advanced approach for targeting stratigraphic traps and specific reservoir facies within a geologic system and in providing a refined assessment of undiscovered and underdeveloped reservoirs and associated oil and gas resources.

Ernest A. Mancini

2004-02-05T23:59:59.000Z

443

BASIN ANALYSIS AND PETROLEUM SYSTEM CHARACTERIZATION AND MODELING, INTERIOR SALT BASINS, CENTRAL AND EASTERN GULF OF MEXICO  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The principal research effort for Year 2 of the project has been data compilation and the determination of the burial and thermal maturation histories of the North Louisiana Salt Basin and basin modeling and petroleum system identification. In the first nine (9) months of Year 2, the research focus was on the determination of the burial and thermal maturation histories, and during the remainder of the year the emphasis has basin modeling and petroleum system identification. Existing information on the North Louisiana Salt Basin has been evaluated, an electronic database has been developed, regional cross sections have been prepared, structure and isopach maps have been constructed, and burial history, thermal maturation history and hydrocarbon expulsion profiles have been prepared. Seismic data, cross sections, subsurface maps and related profiles have been used in evaluating the tectonic, depositional, burial and thermal maturation histories of the basin. Oil and gas reservoirs have been found to be associated with salt-supported anticlinal and domal features (salt pillows, turtle structures and piercement domes); with normal faulting associated with the northern basin margin and listric down-to-the-basin faults (state-line fault complex) and faulted salt features; and with combination structural and stratigraphic features (Sabine and Monroe Uplifts) and monoclinal features with lithologic variations. Petroleum reservoirs are mainly Upper Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous fluvial-deltaic sandstone facies and Lower Cretaceous and Upper Cretaceous shoreline, marine bar and shallow shelf sandstone facies. Cretaceous unconformities significantly contribute to the hydrocarbon trapping mechanism capacity in the North Louisiana Salt Basin. The chief petroleum source rock in this basin is Upper Jurassic Smackover lime mudstone beds. The generation of hydrocarbons from Smackover lime mudstone was initiated during the Early Cretaceous and continued into the Tertiary. Hydrocarbon expulsion commenced during the Early Cretaceous and continued into the Tertiary with peak expulsion occurring mainly during the Late Cretaceous.

Ernest A. Mancini; Donald A. Goddard; Ronald K. Zimmerman

2005-05-10T23:59:59.000Z

444

Basin center - fractured source rock plays within tectonically segmented foreland (back-arc) basins: Targets for future exploration  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Production from fractured reservoirs has long been an industry target, but interest in this type play has increased recently because of new concepts and technology, especially horizontal drilling. Early petroleum exploration programs searched for fractured reservoirs from shale, tight sandstones, carbonates, or basement in anticlinal or fault traps, without particular attention to source rocks. Foreland basins are some of the best oil-generating basins in the world because of their rich source rocks. Examples are the Persian Gulf basin, the Alberta basin and Athabasca tar sands, and the eastern Venezuela basin and Orinoco tar sands. Examples of Cretaceous producers are the wrench-faulted La Paz-Mara anticlinal fields, Maracaibo basin, Venezuela; the active Austin Chalk play in an extensional area on the north flank of the Gulf of Mexico continental margin basin; and the Niobrara Chalk and Pierre Shale plays of the central Rocky Mountains, United States. These latter plays are characteristic of a foreland basin fragmented into intermontane basins by the Laramide orogeny. The Florence field, Colorado, discovered in 1862, and the Silo field, Wyoming, discovered in 1980, are used as models for current prospecting and will be described in detail. The technologies applied to fracture-source rock plays are refined surface and subsurface mapping from new log suites, including resistivity mapping; 3D-3C seismic, gravity, and aeromagnetic mapping; borehole path seismic mapping associated with horizontal drilling; fracture mapping with the Formation MicroScanner and other logging tools; measurements while drilling and other drilling and completion techniques; surface geochemistry to locate microseeps; and local and regional lineament discrimination.

Weimer, R.J. [Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO (United States)

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

445

DeFrees Small Wave Basin | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Wave Basin Wave Basin Jump to: navigation, search Basic Specifications Facility Name DeFrees Small Wave Basin Overseeing Organization Cornell University Hydrodynamics Hydrodynamic Testing Facility Type Wave Basin Length(m) 15.0 Beam(m) 0.8 Depth(m) 0.9 Water Type Freshwater Towing Capabilities Towing Capabilities None Wavemaking Capabilities Wavemaking Capabilities Yes Maximum Wave Height(m) 0.3 Maximum Wave Height(m) at Wave Period(s) 3.0 Maximum Wave Length(m) 30 Wave Period Range(s) 3.0 Current Velocity Range(m/s) 0.0 Programmable Wavemaking Yes Wavemaking Description Computer controlled hydraulic paddle, arbitrary wave shape possible Wave Direction Uni-Directional Simulated Beach Yes Description of Beach 1:10 sloping glass with dissipative horsehair covering if needed

446

Geographic Information System At Northern Basin & Range Region (Coolbaugh,  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

source source History View New Pages Recent Changes All Special Pages Semantic Search/Querying Get Involved Help Apps Datasets Community Login | Sign Up Search Page Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon » Geographic Information System At Northern Basin & Range Region (Coolbaugh, Et Al., 2005 - 2) Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Exploration Activity: Geographic Information System At Northern Basin & Range Region (Coolbaugh, Et Al., 2005 - 2) Exploration Activity Details Location Northern Basin and Range Geothermal Region Exploration Technique Geographic Information System Activity Date Usefulness useful regional reconnaissance DOE-funding Unknown References Mark Coolbaugh, Richard Zehner, Corne Kreemer, David Blackwell, Gary Oppliger (2005) A Map Of Geothermal Potential For The Great Basin, Usa-

447

Exploration and Development Techniques for Basin and Range Geothermal  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Techniques for Basin and Range Geothermal Techniques for Basin and Range Geothermal Systems: Examples from Dixie Valley, Nevada Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Conference Paper: Exploration and Development Techniques for Basin and Range Geothermal Systems: Examples from Dixie Valley, Nevada Abstract Abstract unavailable. Authors David D. Blackwell, Mark Leidig, Richard P. Smith, Stuart D. Johnson and Kenneth W. Wisian Conference GRC Annual Meeting; Reno, NV; 2002/09/22 Published Geothermal Resources Council, 2002 DOI Not Provided Check for DOI availability: http://crossref.org Online Internet link for Exploration and Development Techniques for Basin and Range Geothermal Systems: Examples from Dixie Valley, Nevada Citation David D. Blackwell,Mark Leidig,Richard P. Smith,Stuart D. Johnson,Kenneth

448

Contemporary Tectonic Deformation of the Basin and Range Province, Western  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Contemporary Tectonic Deformation of the Basin and Range Province, Western Contemporary Tectonic Deformation of the Basin and Range Province, Western United States: 10 Years of Observation with the Global Positioning System Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Journal Article: Contemporary Tectonic Deformation of the Basin and Range Province, Western United States: 10 Years of Observation with the Global Positioning System Abstract [1] We have estimated patterns and rates of crustal movement across 800 km of the Basin and Range at ∼39° north latitude with Global Positioning System surveys in 1992, 1996, 1998, and 2002. The total rate of motion tangent to the small circle around the Pacific-North America pole of rotation is 10.4 ± 1.0 mm/yr, and motion normal to this small circle is 3.9 ± 0.9 mm/yr compared to the east end of our network. On the Colorado

449

Atlantic Basin Refining Dynamics from U.S. Perspective  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

This presentation focuses on the current refining situation in the Atlantic Basin, This presentation focuses on the current refining situation in the Atlantic Basin, Page 1 including some discussion on how we got here, and on drivers that will influence the next 5 years. I will focus on three topics today that are critical to the petroleum product dynamics of Page 2 the Atlantic Basin over the next several years. The first is product demand growth - something that has been affected both by the recession and legislation. Next I will cover the supply situation for gasoline and distillates in the Atlantic Basin, since Europe and the U.S. are closely entwined in these markets. Last, we will visit the outlook for those drivers affecting profitability - an area of large uncertainty. I will begin today with a short discussion of important underlying long-term trends in U.S.

450

Magnetotellurics At Northern Basin & Range Region (Pritchett, 2004) | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Magnetotellurics At Northern Basin & Range Region Magnetotellurics At Northern Basin & Range Region (Pritchett, 2004) Exploration Activity Details Location Northern Basin and Range Geothermal Region Exploration Technique Magnetotellurics Activity Date Usefulness useful DOE-funding Unknown Notes NOTE: These are theoretical/computer simulation tests of various methods on eight hypothetical 'model' basing-and-range geothermal systems. "The 300-meter heat flow holes are essentially useless for finding the "hidden" reservoirs. Clearly, the best results are obtained from the SP and MT surveys, with DC resistivity a close third. It is concluded that the best way to find "hidden" basin and range geothermal resources of this general type is to carry out simultaneous SP and low-frequency MT surveys, and then

451

Diachroneity of Basin and Range Extension and Yellowstone Hotspot Volcanism  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Diachroneity of Basin and Range Extension and Yellowstone Hotspot Volcanism Diachroneity of Basin and Range Extension and Yellowstone Hotspot Volcanism in Northwestern Nevada Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Journal Article: Diachroneity of Basin and Range Extension and Yellowstone Hotspot Volcanism in Northwestern Nevada Abstract Some of the earliest volcanic rocks attributed to the Yellowstone hotspot erupted from the McDermitt caldera and related volcanic centers in northwestern Nevada at 17-15 Ma. At that time, extensional faulting was ongoing to the south in central Nevada, leading some to suggest that the nascent hotspot caused or facilitated middle Miocene Basin and Range extension. Regional geologic relationships indicate that the total magnitude of extension in northwestern Nevada is low compared to the amount

452

Geographic Information System At Northern Basin & Range Region (Laney,  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Geographic Information System At Northern Basin & Geographic Information System At Northern Basin & Range Region (Laney, 2005) Exploration Activity Details Location Northern Basin and Range Geothermal Region Exploration Technique Geographic Information System Activity Date Usefulness useful regional reconnaissance DOE-funding Unknown Notes Regional Assessment of Exploration Potential for Geothermal Systems in The Great Basin Using a Geographic Information System (GIS) - Part II, Coolbaugh, Zehner, Raines, Shevenell, Minor, Sawatzky and Oppliger. The objective is to generate new exploration targets for both conventional and EGS capable geothermal systems by analyzing regional data in a GIS. Digital geothermal data will be made available to industry and researchers on a web site. Relationships among the data will be explored using spatial

453

Geothermal Resource Analysis And Structure Of Basin And Range Systems,  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Analysis And Structure Of Basin And Range Systems, Analysis And Structure Of Basin And Range Systems, Especially Dixie Valley Geothermal Field, Nevada Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Report: Geothermal Resource Analysis And Structure Of Basin And Range Systems, Especially Dixie Valley Geothermal Field, Nevada Details Activities (12) Areas (5) Regions (0) Abstract: Publish new thermal and drill data from the Dizie Valley Geothermal Field that affect evaluation of Basin and Range Geothermal Resources in a very major and positive way. Completed new geophysical surveys of Dizie Valley including gravity and aeromagnetics and integrated the geophysical, seismic, geological and drilling data at Dizie Valley into local and regional geologic models. Developed natural state mass and energy

454

Characteristics of Basin and Range Geothermal Systems with Fluid  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Characteristics of Basin and Range Geothermal Systems with Fluid Characteristics of Basin and Range Geothermal Systems with Fluid Temperatures of 150°C to 200°C Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Conference Paper: Characteristics of Basin and Range Geothermal Systems with Fluid Temperatures of 150°C to 200°C Abstract Six geothermal reservoirs with fluid temperatures over 200°C and ten geothermal systems with measured fluid temperatures of 150-200°C have been discovered in the northern Basin and Range Province of the USA. A comparison of these high and moderate temperature systems shows considerable overlap in geographical distribution, geology, and physical properties. Our ability to distinguish between moderate and high temperature systems using fluid chemistry has been limited by often

455

File:Denver Basin.pdf | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Basin.pdf Basin.pdf Jump to: navigation, search File File history File usage File:Denver Basin.pdf Size of this preview: 463 × 599 pixels. Other resolution: 464 × 600 pixels. Full resolution ‎(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 625 KB, MIME type: application/pdf) File history Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time. Date/Time Thumbnail Dimensions User Comment current 11:00, 4 March 2013 Thumbnail for version as of 11:00, 4 March 2013 1,275 × 1,650 (625 KB) Alevine (Talk | contribs) You cannot overwrite this file. Edit this file using an external application (See the setup instructions for more information) File usage There are no pages that link to this file. Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=File:Denver_Basin.pdf&oldid=5897

456

L-Shaped Flume Wave Basin | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

L-Shaped Flume Wave Basin L-Shaped Flume Wave Basin Jump to: navigation, search Basic Specifications Facility Name L-Shaped Flume Wave Basin Overseeing Organization United States Army Corp of Engineers (ERDC) Hydrodynamic Testing Facility Type Wave Basin Length(m) 76.2 Beam(m) 15.2 Depth(m) 1.8 Water Type Freshwater Special Physical Features Contact POC Towing Capabilities Towing Capabilities None Wavemaking Capabilities Wavemaking Capabilities Yes Maximum Wave Height(m) 0.6 Maximum Wave Height(m) at Wave Period(s) 10.0 Wave Period Range(s) 10.0 Current Velocity Range(m/s) 0.0 Programmable Wavemaking Yes Wave Direction Uni-Directional Simulated Beach No Channel/Tunnel/Flume Channel/Tunnel/Flume None Wind Capabilities Wind Capabilities None Control and Data Acquisition Description Automated data acquisition and control sys

457

FRASER BASIN LANDFILL INVENTORY DOE FRAP 1997-19  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

-term sustainability of the Fraser River Basin. Inventories of point and non-point sources of pollution from both's WASTE database, Federal Indian Band Landfill investigations, and BC Environment's Municipal Landfill

458

Error Analysis of Satellite Precipitation Products in Mountainous Basins  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Accurate quantitative precipitation estimation over mountainous basins is of great importance because of their susceptibility to hazards such as flash floods, shallow landslides, and debris flows, triggered by heavy precipitation events (HPEs). In ...

Yiwen Mei; Emmanouil N. Anagnostou; Efthymios I. Nikolopoulos; Marco Borga

2014-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

459

Mercury in the sediments of the Pallanza Basin  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... Pallanza Basin of Lago Maggiore, Italy, in 1970 have been analysed for mercury, using flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The concentration of mercury in the Maggiore sediments proved to be ...

V. DAMIANI; R. L. THOMAS

1974-10-25T23:59:59.000Z

460

Roanoke River Basin Bi-State Commission (Multiple States)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Roanoke River Basin Bi-State Commission was established as a bi-state commission composed of members from the Commonwealth of Virginia and the State of North Carolina.The purpose of the...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "joaquin basin onshore" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Oil and gas resources in the West Siberian Basin, Russia  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The primary objective of this study is to assess the oil and gas potential of the West Siberian Basin of Russia. The study does not analyze the costs or technology necessary to achieve the estimates of the ultimate recoverable oil and gas. This study uses reservoir data to estimate recoverable oil and gas quantities which were aggregated to the field level. Field totals were summed to a basin total for discovered fields. An estimate of undiscovered oil and gas, from work of the US Geological Survey (USGS), was added to give a total basin resource volume. Recent production decline points out Russia`s need to continue development of its discovered recoverable oil and gas. Continued exploration is required to discover additional oil and gas that remains undiscovered in the basin.

NONE

1997-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

462

Regional And Local Trends In Helium Isotopes, Basin And Range...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Pathways Abstract Fluids from the western margin of the Basin and Range have helium isotope ratios as high as 6-7 Ra, indicating a strong mantle melt influence and consistent...

463

Hydrologic and Institutional Water Availability in the Brazos River Basin  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

been constructed to facilitate management of the water resources of the various river basins of the state. Effective control and utilization of the water resource supplied by a stream/reservoir system requires an understanding of the amount of water...

Wurbs, Ralph A.; Bergman, Carla E.; Carriere, Patrick E.; Walls, W. Brian

464

Negotiating nature : expertise and environment in the Klamath River Basin  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

"Negotiating Nature" explores resource management in action and the intertwined roles of law and science in environmental conflicts in the Upper Klamath River Basin in southern Oregon. I follow disputes over the management ...

Buchanan, Nicholas Seong Chul

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

465

Oil shale and coal in intermontane basins of Thailand  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Mae Tip intermontane basin contains Cenozoic oil shales in beds up to 1 m (3.3 ft) thick interbedded with coal and mudstone. The oil shales contain lamosite-type alginite, and give a maximum oil yield of 122 L/MT (29.3 gal/ton). The beds are laterally continuous for at least 1.5 km (1.0 mi), but pass into mudstones toward the basin margin. The oil shales originated when peat swamps close to a steep basin margin were flooded by shallow lakes, allowing algae to replace rooted vegetation. This distinctive oil shale-coal assemblage is known from many small intermontane basins in Thailand, where locally high geothermal gradients suggest potential for hydrocarbons.

Gibling, M.R.; Srisuk, S.; Ukakimaphan, Y.

1985-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

466

HYDROCLIMATIC ASPECTS OF THE 2011 ASSINIBOINE RIVER BASIN FLOOD  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

In the spring and early summer of 2011, the Assiniboine River Basin in Canada experienced an extreme flood that was unprecedented in terms of duration and severity. The flood had significant socioeconomic impacts and caused over one billion ...

Julian Brimelow; Kit Szeto; Barrie Bonsal; John Hanesiak; Bohdan Kochtubajda; Fraser Evans; Ronald Stewart

467

Intensification of Geostrophic Currents in the Canada Basin, Arctic Ocean  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Continuous sampling of upper-ocean hydrographic data in the Canada Basin from various sources spanning from 2003 through 2011 provides an unprecedented opportunity to observe changes occurring in a major feature of the Arctic Ocean. In a 112-km-...

Miles G. McPhee

2013-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

468

Recovery Act Workers Complete Environmental Cleanup of Coal Ash Basin  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Savannah River Site (SRS) recently cleaned up a 17-acre basin containing coal ash residues from Cold War operations. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act project was safely completed at a...

469

Kuznetsk Basin coking coal: Reserves and technological value  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Reserves of Kuznetsk Basin coking coal are analyzed, in terms of rank composition and scope for coke production. The technological value of the coal is evaluated by the OOO VNITs Ugol...

V. P. Ivanov; V. Yu. Sushkov; A. A. Torgunakov; S. A. Pantykin

2008-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

470

Micropaleontology and biostratigraphy of the coastal basins of West Africa  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This book is intended to meet the need for a single volume on descriptive micropaleontology of West African microfauna assemblage which is different from that of the Boreal, Mediterranean, Pacific and Atlantic regions. The contents include: Preface. Introduction. Systematics: West African foraminifera species: Systematic classification and description. Glossary for the foraminifera. Selected references for the foraminifera. The ostracoda: Systematic classification and description. Glossary for the ostracoda. Selected references for the ostracoda. Stratigraphic Sequences of the West African Coastal Basins: General review. Angola-Cuanza basin. Congo. Gabon. Cameroun-Douala basin. Nigeria. Togo-Benin basin. Ghana. Ivory Coast. Senegal. Appendix: Brief classification of foraminifera. Paleo-ecology of the foraminifera. Testing of samples. Collection of samples. Preparation of samples. Preparation of thin sections. Storage of microfossils. Methods of examination. Index.

Kogbe, C.A.; Mehes, K.

1986-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

471

ORIGINAL ARTICLE Hydropower development in the lower Mekong basin  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ORIGINAL ARTICLE Hydropower development in the lower Mekong basin: alternative approaches to deal hydropower generation and potentially irreversible negative impacts on the ecosystems that provide hydropower generation and potentially irreversible negative impacts on the ecosystems that provide

Vermont, University of

472

Modeling-Computer Simulations At Northern Basin & Range Region...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

systems References D. D. Blackwell, K. W. Wisian, M. C. Richards, Mark Leidig, Richard Smith, Jason McKenna (2003) Geothermal Resource Analysis And Structure Of Basin And Range...

473

Modeling-Computer Simulations At Nw Basin & Range Region (Blackwell...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

systems References D. D. Blackwell, K. W. Wisian, M. C. Richards, Mark Leidig, Richard Smith, Jason McKenna (2003) Geothermal Resource Analysis And Structure Of Basin And Range...

474

Hydrocarbons in rift basins: the role of stratigraphy  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...versus shallow-water environments...A (1999) Hydrocarbons in rift basins...Facies and hydrocarbon potential The...availability of water. This can either...form seals for hydrocarbons. The shallow-water environ- ments...

1999-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

475

Ground Water Basin Management at the Neyveli Lignite Mines  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The Neyveli lignite mines of India contain large reserves and represent a unique mining venture in...2...hydrogeological basin in which these mines lie contain multiple aquifers under hydrostatic pressure. There ...

V. Ravi Kumar; S. N. Sahay; N. Periasamy; S. Shiv Prasad

2010-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

476

Environmental restoration in the Atchafalaya Basin : boundaries and interventions  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The Atchafalaya River is a 135-mile long river in Louisiana. This makes it the largest distributary of the Mississippi. In this thesis, I will review the ways in which the Atchafalaya Basin is described as a complex system ...

Van Maasakkers, Mattijs J. (Mattijs Johannes)

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

477

Geothermal Resource Analysis and Structure of Basin and Range Systems,  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Analysis and Structure of Basin and Range Systems, Analysis and Structure of Basin and Range Systems, Especially Dixie Valley Geothermal Field, Nevada Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Report: Geothermal Resource Analysis and Structure of Basin and Range Systems, Especially Dixie Valley Geothermal Field, Nevada Authors David D. Blackwell, Kenneth W. Wisian, Maria C. Richards, Mark Leidig, Richard Smith and Jason McKenna Published U.S. Department of Energy, 2003 DOI Not Provided Check for DOI availability: http://crossref.org Online Internet link for Geothermal Resource Analysis and Structure of Basin and Range Systems, Especially Dixie Valley Geothermal Field, Nevada Citation David D. Blackwell,Kenneth W. Wisian,Maria C. Richards,Mark Leidig,Richard Smith,Jason McKenna. 2003. Geothermal Resource Analysis and Structure of

478

Coal Pile Basin Project (4595), 5/31/2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Coal Pile Basin Project (4595) Coal Pile Basin Project (4595) Program or Field Office: Y-12 Site Office Location(s) (City/County/State): Oak Ridge, Anderson County, Tennessee Proposed Action Description: Submit by E-mail The proposed action is provide demolish and deactivate the coal pile basin to grade where practical and backfill below grade portion of basin; the remaining underground portion of the stock out conveyor structure, both entrances and backfill pit; and remove universal waste, conveyor belt, asbestos; and, miscellaneous shed type structure at the south entrance to the coal pile. Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied: 81.29- Disposal facilities for construction and demolition waste For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, including the full text of each

479

DeFrees Large Wave Basin | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Large Wave Basin Large Wave Basin Jump to: navigation, search Basic Specifications Facility Name DeFrees Large Wave Basin Overseeing Organization Cornell University Hydrodynamics Hydrodynamic Testing Facility Type Wave Basin Length(m) 32.0 Beam(m) 0.6 Depth(m) 0.9 Water Type Freshwater Towing Capabilities Towing Capabilities None Wavemaking Capabilities Wavemaking Capabilities Yes Maximum Wave Height(m) 0.5 Maximum Wave Height(m) at Wave Period(s) 3.0 Maximum Wave Length(m) 64 Wave Period Range(s) 3.0 Current Velocity Range(m/s) 0.0 Programmable Wavemaking Yes Wavemaking Description Computer controlled 4m hydraulic wave paddle stroke allows a series of solitary waves to be generated; arbitrary wave shape possible Wave Direction Uni-Directional Simulated Beach Yes

480

EIS-0495: Walla Walla Basin Spring Chinook Hatchery Program;  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

495: Walla Walla Basin Spring Chinook Hatchery Program; 495: Walla Walla Basin Spring Chinook Hatchery Program; Milton-Freewater, Oregon, and Dayton, Washington EIS-0495: Walla Walla Basin Spring Chinook Hatchery Program; Milton-Freewater, Oregon, and Dayton, Washington SUMMARY Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) is preparing an EIS to analyze the potential environmental impacts of funding a proposal by the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation to construct and operate a hatchery for spring Chinook salmon in the Walla Walla River basin. Additional information is available at the project website: http://efw.bpa.gov/environmental_services/Document_Library/WallaWallaHatchery/. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILALE FOR DOWNLOAD March 28, 2013 EIS-0495: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "joaquin basin onshore" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

The geochemistry of uranium in the Orca Basin  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

inhibit=. vertical mixing between basin brine and overlying seawater. This severely limits the transport of hexa- valent uranium across this boundary. Second, the major depositional process in the basin is mass transport of sediments from... The continuing growth of nuclear power combined with the steady depletion of existing high-grade uranium ore has brought about an increase in the use of and search for lower-grade uranium deposits. According to Lieberman (1976), there is little undiscovered...

Weber, Frederick Fewell

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

482

Improved Basin Analog System to Characterize Unconventional Gas Resource  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

identification method. ..................... 31 Fig. 3.4?Probability distribution at petroleum system level. ......................................... 34 Fig. 3.5?Example of generating probability distribution of qualitative parameter. ....... 34 Fig. 3....6?Example of generating probability distribution of quantitative parameter. ..... 35 Fig. 3.7?Probability distributions of kerogen type in San Juan and Piceance basin. ..... 38 Fig. 3.8?Probability distributions of porosity in San Juan and Piceance basin...

Wu, Wenyan 1983-

2012-10-02T23:59:59.000Z

483

Regional Service Plan For Coordinated Transportation In the Permian Basin  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

services. Out of necessity, public transportation service providers and health & human service agencies in the Permian Basin have historically worked closely with each other to ultimately benefit the end users of such services. Thus, this document... services. Out of necessity, public transportation service providers and health & human service agencies in the Permian Basin have historically worked closely with each other to ultimately benefit the end users of such services. Thus, this document...

Permian Basin Regional Planning Commission

2010-10-27T23:59:59.000Z

484

Analysis of salt concentrations in the Brazos River Basin, Texas  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ANALYSIS OF SALT CONCENTRATIONS IN THE BRAZOS RIVER BASIN, TEXAS A Thesis by CHARLES KEITH GANZE Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER... OF SCIENCE August 1990 Major Subject: Civil Engineering Analysis of Salt Concentrations in the Brazos River Basin, Texas A Thesis by CHARLES KEITH GANZE Approved as to style and content by: Ralph A. Wurbs (Chair of Committee) James S. Bonner...

Ganze, Charles Keith

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

485

California Basin Studies (CaBS). Final contract report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The California Continental Borderland`s present configuration dates from about 4 to 5 X 10{sup 6} years Before Present (B.P.) and is the most recent of several configurations of the southern California margin that have evolved after the North America Plate over-rode the East Pacific Rise about 30 X 10{sup 6} years ago. The present morphology is a series of two to three northwest-southeast trending rows of depressions separated by banks and insular ridges. Two inner basins, Santa Monica and San Pedro, have been the site for the Department of Energy-funded California Basin Study (CaBS) Santa Monica and San Pedro Basins contain post-Miocene sediment thicknesses of about 2.5 and 1.5 km respectively. During the Holocene (past 10,000 years) about 10-12 m have accumulated. The sediment entered the basin by one or a combination of processes including particle infall (mainly as bioaggregates) from surface waters, from nepheloid plumes (surface, mid-depths and near-bottom), from turbidity currents, mass movements, and to a very minor degree direct precipitation. In Santa Monica Basin, during the last century, particle infall and nepheloid plume transport have been the most common processes. The former dominates in the central basin floor in water depths from 900 to 945 m. where a characteristic silt-clay with a typical mean diameter of about 0.006 mm, phi standard deviation.

Gorsline, D.S.

1991-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

486

Paleotopography and hydrocarbon accumulation: Williston, Powder River, and Denver basins  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Recent geomorphic analyses of 1:24,000 scale topographic maps in the three major basins of the northern Great Plains have disclosed a persistent system of basement paleotopographic features that trend north-northeast throughout the region. Superimposed across this system and subtly influenced by it, are the northwesterly trending Laramide structural features. Paleozoic depositional patterns have been strongly influenced by the paleoridge and trough system formed by the north-northeast features. Mesozoic deposition has also been affected by the ancient subsurface system but in a more subtle manner. Many of the Paleozoic and Mezoxoic hydrocarbon locations in the three basins appear to be the results of paleotopographic control on hydrocarbon accumulation sites. This affect ranges from Paleozoic reef sites in the Williston basin through paleotrough localization of Pennsylvanian Minnelusa production in the Powder River basin to fractured Cretaceous Niobrara production at the Silo field in the Denver basin. Basement paleotopography is the underlying factor in all deposition and subsequent hydrocarbon migration in any basin. As such, it should be considered a major factor in the exploration for oil and gas.

Thomas, G.E. (Thomas and Associates, Denver, CO (United States))

1991-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

487

Understanding Long-Term Solute Transport in Sedimentary Basins: Simulating Brine Migration in the Alberta Basin. Final Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Mass transport in deep sedimentary basins places important controls on ore formation, petroleum migration, CO2 sequestration, and geochemical reactions that affect petroleum reservoir quality, but large-scale transport in this type of setting remains poorly understood. This lack of knowledge is highlighted in the resource-rich Alberta Basin, where geochemical and hydrogeologic studies have suggested residence times ranging from hundreds of millions of years to less than 5 My, respectively. Here we developed new hydrogeologic models that were constrained by geochemical observations to reconcile these two very different estimates. The models account for variable-density fluid flow, heat transport, solute transport, sediment deposition and erosion, sediment compressibility, and dissolution of salt deposits, including Cl/Br systematics. Prior interpretations of Cl/Br ratios in the Alberta Basin concluded that the brines were derived from evaporatively-concentrated brines that were subsequently diluted by seawater and freshwater; models presented here show that halite dissolution must have contributed strongly as well, which implies significantly greater rates of mass transport. This result confirms that Cl/Br ratios are subject to significant non-uniqueness and thus do not provide good independent indicators of the origin of brines. Salinity and Cl/Br ratios provided valuable new constraints for basin-scale models, however. Sensitivity studies revealed that permeabilities obtained from core- and field-scale tests were appropriate for basin-scale models, despite the differences in scale between the tests and the models. Simulations of groundwater age show that the residence time of porefluids in much of the basin is less than 100 My. Groundwater age increases with depth and approaches 200 My in the deepest part of the basin, but brines are significantly younger than their host rocks throughout the basin.

Alicia M. Wilson

2009-11-30T23:59:59.000Z

488

BASIN ANALYSIS AND PETROLEUM SYSTEM CHARACTERIZATION AND MODELING, INTERIOR SALT BASINS, CENTRAL AND EASTERN GULF OF MEXICO  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The principal research effort for Year 1 of the project is data compilation and the determination of the tectonic and depositional histories of the North Louisiana Salt Basin. In the first three (3) to six (6) months of Year 1, the research focus is on data compilation and the remainder of the year the emphasis is on the tectonic and depositional histories of the basin. No major problems have been encountered to date, and the project is on schedule.

Ernest A. Mancini

2003-09-11T23:59:59.000Z

489

BASIN ANALYSIS AND PETROLEUM SYSTEM CHARACTERIZATION AND MODELING, INTERIOR SALT BASINS, CENTRAL AND EASTERN GULF OF MEXICO  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The principal research effort for Year 1 of the project is data compilation and the determination of the tectonic and depositional histories of the North Louisiana Salt Basin. In the first three (3) to six (6) months of Year 1, the research focus is on data compilation and the remainder of the year the emphasis is on the tectonic and depositional histories of the basin. No major problems have been encountered to date, and the project is on schedule.

Ernest A. Mancini

2003-11-11T23:59:59.000Z

490

Yakima Basin Fish Passage Project, Phase 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Implementation of the Yakima Basin Fish Passage Project -- Phase 2 would significantly improve the production of anadromous fish in the Yakima River system. The project would provide offsite mitigation and help to compensate for lower Columbia River hydroelectric fishery losses. The Phase 2 screens would allow greater numbers of juvenile anadromous fish to survive. As a consequence, there would be higher returns of adult salmon and steelhead to the Yakima River. The proposed action would play an integral part in the overall Yakima River anadromous fish enhancement program (fish passage improvement, habitat enhancement, hatchery production increases, and harvest management). These would be environmental benefits associated with implementation of the Fish Passage and Protective Facilities Phase 2 Project. Based on the evaluation presented in this assessment, there would be no significant adverse environmental impacts if the proposed action was carried forward. No significant adverse environmental effects have been identified from construction and operation of the Yakima Phase 2 fish passage project. Proper design and implementation of the project will ensure no adverse effects will occur. Based on the information in this environmental analysis, BPA's and Reclamation's proposal to construct these facilities does not constitute a major Federal action that could significantly affect the quality of the human environment. 8 refs., 4 figs., 6 tabs.

Not Available

1991-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

491

Prospects For Electricity Generation In The San Luis Basin, Colorado, Usa |  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Prospects For Electricity Generation In The San Luis Basin, Colorado, Usa Prospects For Electricity Generation In The San Luis Basin, Colorado, Usa Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Conference Paper: Prospects For Electricity Generation In The San Luis Basin, Colorado, Usa Details Activities (2) Areas (1) Regions (0) Abstract: The San Luis basin is the largest and deepest basin in the Neogene Rio Grande rift, and has many similarities to the basins of the US Basin and Range Province. It is asymmetric with a displacement of as much as 9 km on its eastern margin, and approximately 6.4 km of sedimentary rocks of late Oligocene or younger age in the deepest portion of the basin. Temperature measurements in shallow wells in the northern basin have an average geothermal gradient of 59.0 ± 11.8°C km-1 (± standard

492

BASIN BLAN CO BLAN CO S OT ERO IGNAC IO-BLANCO AZ TEC BALLAR  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

BOE Reserve Class BOE Reserve Class No 2001 reserves 0.1 - 10 MBOE 10.1 - 100 MBOE 100.1 - 1,000 MBOE 1,000.1- 10,000 MBOE 10,000.1 - 100,000 MBOE > 100,000 MBOE Basin Outline AZ UT NM CO 1 2 Index Map for 2 Paradox-San Juan Panels 2001 Reserve Summary for All Paradox-San Juan Basin Fields Total Total Total Number Liquid Gas BOE of Reserves Reserves Reserves Fields (Mbbl) (MMcf) (Mbbl) Paradox-San Juan 250 174,193 20,653,622 3,616,464 Basin CO NM IGNAC IO-BLANCO IGNAC IO-BLANCO IGNAC IO-BLANCO IGNAC IO-BLANCO IGNAC IO-BLANCO BASIN BASIN BLAN CO BLAN CO BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BISTI BAL LAR D BASIN BISTI BLA NCO S OT ERO BAL LAR D LIND RITH W BASIN BLA NCO BLA NCO S BLA NCO S TAPAC ITO GAVIL AN BASIN BLA NCO The mapped oil and gas field boundary outlines were created by the Reserves and Production Division, Office of Oil and Gas, Energy Information Administration pursuant to studies required by

493

BASIN BLAN CO BLAN CO S OT ERO IGNAC IO-BLANCO AZ TEC BALLAR  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Gas Reserve Class Gas Reserve Class No 2001 gas reserves 0.1 - 10 MMCF 10.1 - 100 MMCF 100.1 - 1,000 MMCF 1,000.1- 10,000 MMCF 10,000.1 - 100,000 MMCF > 100,000 MMCF Basin Outline AZ UT NM CO 1 2 Index Map for 2 Paradox-San Juan Panels 2001 Reserve Summary for All Paradox-San Juan Basin Fields Total Total Total Number Liquid Gas BOE of Reserves Reserves Reserves Fields (Mbbl) (MMcf) (Mbbl) Paradox-San Juan 250 174,193 20,653,622 3,616,464 Basin CO NM IGNAC IO-BLANCO IGNAC IO-BLANCO IGNAC IO-BLANCO IGNAC IO-BLANCO IGNAC IO-BLANCO BASIN BASIN BLAN CO BLAN CO BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BISTI BAL LAR D BASIN BISTI BLA NCO S OT ERO BAL LAR D LIND RITH W BASIN BLA NCO BLA NCO S BLA NCO S TAPAC ITO GAVIL AN BASIN BLA NCO The mapped oil and gas field boundary outlines were created by the Reserves and Production Division, Office of Oil and Gas, Energy Information Administration pursuant to studies required by

494

BASIN BLAN CO BLAN CO S OT ERO IGNAC IO-BLANCO AZ TEC BALLAR  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Liquids Reserve Class Liquids Reserve Class No 2001 liquids reserves 0.1 - 10 Mbbl 10.1 - 100 Mbbl 100.1 - 1,000 Mbbl 1,000.1- 10,000 Mbbl 10,000.1 - 100,000 Mbbl Basin Outline AZ UT NM CO 1 2 Index Map for 2 Paradox-San Juan Panels 2001 Reserve Summary for All Paradox-San Juan Basin Fields Total Total Total Number Liquid Gas BOE of Reserves Reserves Reserves Fields (Mbbl) (MMcf) (Mbbl) Paradox-San Juan 250 174,193 20,653,622 3,616,464 Basin CO NM IGNAC IO-BLANCO IGNAC IO-BLANCO IGNAC IO-BLANCO IGNAC IO-BLANCO IGNAC IO-BLANCO BASIN BASIN BLAN CO BLAN CO BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BISTI BAL LAR D BASIN BISTI BLA NCO S OT ERO BAL LAR D LIND RITH W BASIN BLA NCO BLA NCO S BLA NCO S TAPAC ITO GAVIL AN BASIN BLA NCO The mapped oil and gas field boundary outlines were created by the Reserves and Production Division, Office of Oil and Gas, Energy Information Administration pursuant to studies required by

495

Reserve estimates in western basins: Unita Basin. Final report, Part III  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This study characterizes an extremely large gas resource located in low permeability, sandstone reservoirs of the Mesaverde group and Wasatch formation in the Uinta Basin, Utah. Total in-place resource is estimated at 395.5 Tcf. Via application of geologic, engineering and economic criteria, the portion of this resource potentially recoverable as reserves is estimated. Those volumes estimated include probable, possible and potential categories and total 3.8 Tcf as a mean estimate of recoverable gas for all plays considered in the basin. Two plays were included in this study and each was separately analyzed in terms of its tight gas resource, established productive characteristics and future reserves potential based on a constant $2/Mcf wellhead gas price scenario. A scheme has been developed to break the overall resource estimate down into components that can be considered as differing technical and economic challenges that must be overcome in order to exploit such resources; in other words, to convert those resources to economically recoverable reserves. About 82.1% of the total evaluated resource is contained within sandstones that have extremely poor reservoir properties with permeabilities considered too low for commerciality using current frac technology.

NONE

1995-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

496

Quantitative analysis of basin-scale heterogeneities using sonic-log data in the Yanchang Basin  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A random medium is used to investigate reservoir heterogeneities in this study. Random media are characterized by autocorrelation functions that allow a construction of spatially anisotropic random structures with different correlation lengths and fluctuation standard deviations. Based on the analysis, we calculate a power spectrum using fast Fourier transform (FFT), which is observed in spatial wavelengths ranging from a few metres to a few thousand metres. Correlation distance and root mean square (RMS) height are directly obtained from the power spectrum. Numerical experiments show that the correlation length and fluctuation standard deviation can cause correlation distance and RMS height undergoing variations. Combining the characteristics of statistical parameters and sonic-log data, we quantitatively analyse the reservoir heterogeneities in the Yanchang Basin. The correlation distance and RMS height of coarse lithofacies in fluvial sandstones interpret a high-energy deposit and strong heterogeneity, affected by different lithological combinations. The correlation lengths decrease gradually from shales, tight sands to gas-bearing sands. Using the sonic-log data from 28 wells in the Yanchang Basin, we compute the isolines of correlation distances and RMS heights for both the He-8 and Shan-1 members in the studied area, which present a correlation with the distribution of gas. This offers an improved foundation for reservoir lateral prediction.

He-Zhen Wu; Li-Yun Fu; Hong-Kui Ge

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

497

A two-dimensional regional basin model of Williston basin hydrocarbon systems  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Institut Francais du Petrole`s two-dimensional model, TEMISPACK, is used to discuss the functioning of petroleum systems in the Williston basin along a 330-km-long section, focusing on four regional source intervals: Ordovician Yeoman formation, Lower Devonian Winnipegosis Formation, Upper Devonian-Lower Mississippian Bakken Formation, and Mississippian Lodgepole formation. Thermal history calibration against present temperature and source rock maturity profiles suggests that the Williston basin can be divided into a region of constant heat flow of about 55 mW/m{sup 2} away from the Nesson anticline, and a region of higher heat flow and enhanced thermal maturity in the vicinity of the Nesson anticline. Original kinetic parameters used in the calibration were derived for each of the four source rocks from Rock-Eval yield curves. Bakken overpressures are entirely due to oil generation,