Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "investigation planning presentation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Strategic Energy Planning Webinar Presentation Slides  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Download presentation slides from the DOE Office of Indian Energy webinar on strategic energy planning.

2

Energy Security: Microgrid Planning and Design (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect

Energy Security: Microgrid Planning and Design presentation to be given at the 2012 WREF in Denver, CO.

Giraldez, J.

2012-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

3

Baruch Plan Presented | National Nuclear Security Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Baruch Plan Presented | National Nuclear Security Administration Baruch Plan Presented | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Our History > NNSA Timeline > Baruch Plan Presented Baruch Plan Presented June 14, 1946 New York, NY Baruch Plan Presented Bernard Baruch presents the American plan for international control of

4

Fermilab Master Plan Fermilab Master Plan Overview Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Master Plan Master Plan Fermilab Master Plan Overview Presentation Mission Support Organization Planning Winter Workshop Feb 20, 2013 Thursday, February 21, 13 Fermilab Master Plan Integrating the new vision for the Intensity Frontier facilities and other Science with a sound strategy for infrastructure and support facility development Thursday, February 21, 13 Fermilab Master Plan In order to help define and best use all laboratory resources to most effec5vely and efficiently meet Fermilab's Plan for Discovery, the laboratory is developing a Fermilab Campus Master Plan (FCMP) for the next 20 years. The document will guide the development of modern, produc5ve, and efficient laboratory facili5es that will enable the laboratory to fulfill its mission of advancing

5

MMCR Upgrades: Present Status and Future Plans  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

MMCR Upgrades: Present Status and Future Plans MMCR Upgrades: Present Status and Future Plans K. B. Widener and A. S. Koontz Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, Washington K. P. Moran and K. A. Clark National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Environmental Technology Laboratory Boulder, Colorado C. Chander STC xxxxxxxxx M. A. Miller and K. L. Johnson Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, New York Abstract In September 2003, the Southern Great Plains (SGP) millimeter wave cloud radar (MMCR) was upgraded to a new digital signal processor that significantly increases the temporal resolution and the processing capability of the MMCR. The Barrow MMCR upgrade will be completed in early 2004. We will discuss the hardware and software C40 upgrade to the MMCRs at SGP and Barrow and the plans

6

CMS: Present status, limitations, and upgrade plans  

SciTech Connect

An overview of the CMS upgrade plans will be presented. A brief status of the CMS detector will be given, covering some of the issues we have so far experienced. This will be followed by an overview of the various CMS upgrades planned, covering the main motivations for them, and the various R&D efforts for the possibilities under study. The CMS detector has been working extremely well since the start of data-taking at the LHC as is evidenced by the numerous excellent results published by CMS and presented at this workshop and recent conferences. Less well documented are the various issues that have been encountered with the detector. In the spirit of this workshop I will cover some of these issues with particular emphasis on problems that motivate some of the upgrades to the CMS detector for this decade of data-taking. Though the CMS detector has been working extremely well and expectations are great for making the most of the LHC luminosity, there have been a number of issues encountered so far. Some of these have been described and while none currently presents a problem for physics performance, some of them are expected to become more problematic, especially at the highest Phase 1 luminosities for which the majority of the integrated luminosity will be collected. These motivate upgrades for various parts of the CMS detector so that the current excellent physics performance can be maintained or even surpassed in the realm of the highest Phase 1 luminosities.

Cheung, H.W.K.; /Fermilab; ,

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

7

UNIT SPECIFIC PLAN FORM INVESTIGATOR INFORMATION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

performed in your work area. This information is requested to help EHS review your Unit Specific Plan Form or stored in your work areas, a" Standard Operating Procedure" (SOP), Appendix A of the Unit Specific Plan1 UNIT SPECIFIC PLAN FORM INVESTIGATOR INFORMATION Principal Investigator: E-Mail: Department

Maroncelli, Mark

8

WECC 10-Year Plan general presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Bradley Nickell Bradley Nickell Director of Transmission Planning Regional Transmission Expansion Planning (RTEP) DOE EAC Meeting October 20, 2011 2 Regional Transmission Expansion Planning What have we been asked to do? Regional Transmission Expansion Planning (RTEP) Expand the breadth and depth of WECC's existing regional transmission planning processes. * Expand stakeholder participation * Increase the understanding of the connection between reliability, cost, and environment * Produce credible, publically available data and models 3 RTEP Organizational Funding Diagram VGS Integration Topic B WGA WIRAB/CREPC Public Policy $12.0M WREZ Phases 3 & 4 National Labs Request for Technical Assistance/Coordination Topic A WECC/TEPPC Interconnection-wide Planning $14.5M Columbia

9

Wood biology We present investigations of wood  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Wood biology We present investigations of wood formation which started in 1999. Samples for investigations are taken from living trees. Processes of wood formation are affected by different factors like temperature and precipitation. #12;We use light microscopy to study cell wall formation in the wood. Double

Cufar, Katarina

10

Steps to Developing the New Orleans Strategic Energy Plan (Presentation),  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Steps to Developing the New Orleans Strategic Energy Plan Steps to Developing the New Orleans Strategic Energy Plan (Presentation), National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Steps to Developing the New Orleans Strategic Energy Plan (Presentation), National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Presented at the New Orleans City Council Utility Subcommittee Meeting, 17 January 2008, New Orleans, Louisiana. 51650.pdf More Documents & Publications Community Greening: How To Develop A Strategic Energy Plan, Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) (Brochure) Rising Above the Water: New Orleans Implements Energy Efficiency and Sustainability Practices Following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita (Fact Sheet), Integrated Deployment: Disaster Recovery (ID) Rising Above the Water: New Orleans Implements Energy Efficiency and

11

Treatment of Solar Generation in Electric Utility Resource Planning (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect

Today's utility planners have a different market and economic context than their predecessors, including planning for the growth of renewable energy. Through interviews and a questionnaire, the authors gathered information on utility supply planning and how solar is represented. Utilities were asked to provide their resource planning process details, key assumptions (e.g. whether DG is represented as supply or negative load), modeling methodology (e.g. type of risk analytics and candidate portfolio development), capacity expansion and production simulation model software, and solar project representation (project size, capacity value and integration cost adder). This presentation aims to begin the exchange of information between utilities, regulators and other stakeholders by capturing utility-provided information about: 1) how various utilities approach long-range resource planning; 2) methods and tools utilities use to conduct resource planning; and, 3) how solar technologies are considered in the resource planning process.

Cory, K.; Sterling, J.; Taylor, M.; McLaren, J.

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

12

Steps to Developing the New Orleans Strategic Energy Plan (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect

This presentation was given by NREL's Elizabeth Doris (Brown) to the New Orleans City Council in January 2008. NREL was funded by DOE to provide technical assistance to New Orleans after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. The presentation provides an overview of strategic energy planning, case studies, and suggested next steps for implementing energy efficiency and renewable energy into the city's rebuilding efforts.

Brown, E.

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

13

Clean slate corrective action investigation plan  

SciTech Connect

The Clean Slate sites discussed in this report are situated in the central portion of the Tonopah Test Range (TTR), north of the Nevada Test Site (NTS) on the northwest portion of the Nellis Air Force Range (NAFR) which is approximately 390 kilometers (km) (240 miles [mi]) northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. These sites were the locations for three of the four Operation Roller Coaster experiments. These experiments evaluated the dispersal of plutonium in the environment from the chemical explosion of a plutonium-bearing device. Although it was not a nuclear explosion, Operation Roller Coaster created some surface contamination which is now the subject of a corrective action strategy being implemented by the Nevada Environmental Restoration Project (NV ERP) for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Corrective Action Investigation (CAI) activities will be conducted at three of the Operation Roller Coaster sites. These are Clean Slate 1 (CS-1), Clean Slate 2 (CS-2), and Clean Slate 3 (CS-3) sites, which are located on the TTR. The document that provides or references all of the specific information relative to the various investigative processes is called the Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP). This CAIP has been prepared for the DOE Nevada Operations Office (DOE/NV) by IT Corporation (IT).

NONE

1996-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

14

Draft Final Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study and Proposed Plan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Draft Final Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study and Proposed Plan Colorado School of Mines, Colorado 80021 #12;The S.M. Stoller Corporation Flood Plain Remedial Investigation / Feasibility Study ..................................................................................................... 1-8 1.6 Previous Investigations

15

Presentation to the EAC - Smart Grid Subcommittee Work Plan Status...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Electricity Advisory Committee Smart Grid Subcommittee Work Plan Status Joe Paladino - DOE Wanda Reder - EAC Smart Grid Sub- Committee Chair June 12, 2012 * Considerations: - Build...

16

Microsoft Word - S04816_InvestigationPlan.doc  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

New Brunswick, New Jersey, Site New Brunswick, New Jersey, Site Investigation Plan to Identify Potential Radiological Contamination in a Sanitary Sewer December 2008 LMS/NBL/S04816 This page intentionally left blank New Brunswick, New Jersey, Site Investigation Plan to Identify Potential Radiological Contamination in a Sanitary Sewer December 2008 This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy Investigation Plan to Identify Contamination in a Sanitary Sewer December 2008 Doc. No. S0481600 Page i Contents 1.0 Background ......................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Objectives of This Study.....................................................................................................

17

The planning of site investigations for highways  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...tonne capacity winch driven by a diesel engine and a derrick about 6 metres high...core of satisfactory quality. For general purposes, cores of about 70 mm...of the investigation, but as a general procedure a 100 mm drive sample...

Thomas Roy Maylor Wakeling

18

PRE-DESIGN INVESTIGATION WORK PLAN FOR COLDWATER CREEK FROM  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program #12;#12;REVISION 0 PRE-DESIGN INVESTIGATION WORK PLANREVISION 0 PRE-DESIGN INVESTIGATION WORK PLAN FOR COLDWATER CREEK FROM FROST AVENUE TO ST. DENIS.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Louis District Office, Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program

US Army Corps of Engineers

19

Investigation-Derived Waste Management Plan. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

SRS has implemented a comprehensive environmental program to maintain compliance with environmental regulations and mitigate impacts to the environment. One element of the environmental program is the investigation of inactive waste units. Environmental Investigation-Derived Waste (IDW). IDW may include purge water , soil cuttings, drilling fluids, well pumping test and development water, decontamination solutions, contaminated equipment, and personal protection equipment (PPE). In cases where investigations confirm the presence of contamination and the IDW contains waste constituents in concentrations high enough to be of environmental or health concern, special management procedures are warranted. This IDW Management Plan describes specific SRS initiatives for IDW management. The goal is the development of a plan for prudent management of IDW from environmental investigations that is protective of human health and the environment.

Molen, G.

1995-05-24T23:59:59.000Z

20

Developing a Proficiency Testing Plan for your Laboratory Author and Presenter: Jeff C. Gust  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

by the participating laboratory. Why does my laboratory need a Proficiency Testing Plan? Regardless of the standard. The laboratory is required to plan and review the monitoring process. This section goes on to suggest severalDeveloping a Proficiency Testing Plan for your Laboratory Author and Presenter: Jeff C. Gust Vice

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "investigation planning presentation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Presenters  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 16 October 16 Presenters 7:30 Registration 8:30 Welcome Remarks Pilar Thomas, Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs Introductions All 9:00 DOE Tribal Grant Program Overview Lizana Pierce, Department of Energy, Golden Field Office Alaska START Program Overview Alex Dane, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Denali Commission Overview Joel Niemeyer, Denali Commission 9:45 Pathways to Native Village Energy Development Village Energy Planning and Project Development Pilar Thomas, DOE Office of Indian Energy 10:30 -- Break 11:00 Native Village Energy Planning Community Project Development Principles Alex Dane (Moderator), NREL Tribal Energy Planning for the Organized Village of Kasaan Glenn "Stormy" Hamar , Organized Village of Kasaan

22

Part 2: Quality Assurance Project Plan Remedial Investigation, UMore East  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Part 2: Quality Assurance Project Plan Remedial Investigation, UMore East Dakota County, Minnesota\\23191092 UMore 1948 Parcel Remedial Inv\\WorkFiles\\SAP\\Part 2-QAPP Umore East v2.1\\QAPP rev. 2.1.doc A2 Table\\19\\23191092 UMore 1948 Parcel Remedial Inv\\WorkFiles\\SAP\\Part 2-QAPP Umore East v2.1\\QAPP rev. 2

Netoff, Theoden

23

President Obama presents new Climate Action Plan | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

President Obama presents new Climate Action Plan President Obama presents new Climate Action Plan Home > Blogs > Graham7781's blog Graham7781's picture Submitted by Graham7781(1992) Super contributor 27 June, 2013 - 12:39 Climate Action Plan obama OpenEI President President Obama layed out his much anticipated Climate Action Plan tuesday. The President's plan calls for major actions that the administration believes will mitigate the environmental and economic costs of climate change. Obama's six Climate Action Initiatives: 1. Phasing out Fossil Fuels The President stressed the need for higher standards on carbon emissions. The plan will call on the Environmental Protection Agency to work up carbon pollution standards, as well as the Department of Energy to receive up to $8 billion in loan guarantees for a wide array of advanced fossil fuel

24

Development of standard evaluation plan for survey and investigation of residual radioactivity on site  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......Development of standard evaluation plan for survey and...investigation plan are needed to...historical records review, process knowledge...expressed as a standard deviation...Development of standard evaluation plan for survey and......

Sang Won Shin; Joo Ho Whang; Su Hong Lee; Jea Min Lee

2011-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

25

Final work plan for targeted investigation at Hilton, Kansas.  

SciTech Connect

This Work Plan outlines the scope of a targeted investigation to update the status of carbon tetrachloride contamination in groundwater associated with grain storage operations at Hilton, Kansas. The Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC), an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), operated a grain storage facility in Hilton during the 1950s and 1960s. At the time of the CCC/USDA operation in Hilton, grain storage facilities (CCC/USDA and private) were located along the both sides of the former Union Pacific railroad tracks (Figure 1.1). The main grain storage structures were on or near the railroad right-of-way. The proposed targeted investigation, to be conducted by Argonne National Laboratory on the behalf of CCC/USDA, will supplement Argonne's Phase I and Phase II investigations in 1996-1997. The earlier investigations erroneously focused on an area east of the railroad property where the CCC/USDA did not operate, specifically on a private grain storage facility. In addition, the investigation was limited in scope, because access to railroad property was denied (Argonne 1997a,b). The hydrogeologic system at Hilton is potentially complex.

LaFreniere, L. M.; Environmental Science Division

2007-08-28T23:59:59.000Z

26

Development of standard evaluation plan for survey and investigation of residual radioactivity on site  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......standard evaluation plan for survey and investigation...site investigation plan are needed to ensure...under their control. Regulatory agencies need to...historical records review, process knowledge...Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research. NUREG-1640...standard evaluation plan for survey and investigation......

Sang Won Shin; Joo Ho Whang; Su Hong Lee; Jea Min Lee

2011-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

27

Community Involvement Plan: Remedial Investigation of UMore Park East, Dakota County, Minnesota  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

i Community Involvement Plan: Remedial Investigation of UMore Park East, Dakota County, Minnesota Appendix A Fact Sheet on Planned Remedial Investigation of UMore Park East UMP012331 #12;1 1.0 Overview participation in the planned Remedial Investigation (RI) of the eastern portion of the University of Minnesota

Netoff, Theoden

28

Comments received on the plan presented at the March 29, 2006 conference  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Comments to the U.S. Department of Energy on the Plan Presented at the March 29, 2006, Public Technical Conference on the Transmission Congestion Study Plan and Designation of National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors (NIETCs) The following material comprises comments received by the U.S. Department of Energy in response to a request at the March 29, 2006, Public Technical Conference on the Transmission Congestion Study Plan and Designation of National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors (NIETCs) held at the Hilton Garden Inn O'Hare Airport. These comments were received via e- mail to EPACT1221@hq.doe.gov. It was requested that all comments be submitted by close-of- business Friday, April 14, 2006. The U.S. Department of Energy presents the comments as received and without any endorsement

29

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Plan for Corrective Action Unit 541: Small Boy Nevada National Security Site and Nevada Test and Training Range, Nevada Re-direct Destination: Temp Data Fields Matthews, Patrick...

30

EFFECTIVE POSTER PRESENTATIONS In planning a poster presentation it is useful to keep in mind the advantages of a poster over oral  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

EFFECTIVE POSTER PRESENTATIONS In planning a poster presentation it is useful to keep in mind the advantages of a poster over oral presentation. Posters are available for viewing for approximately two hours posters can be presented in the same time & space than oral presentations, & the number of simultaneous

Zhang, Li I.

31

Steps to Developing the New Orleans Strategic Energy Plan (Presentation), National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Steps to Developing the New Orleans Steps to Developing the New Orleans Strategic Energy Plan Elizabeth Brown National Renewable Energy Laboratory New Orleans City Council Utility Subcommittee Meeting January 17, 2008 NREL/PR-7A20-51650 National Renewable Energy Laboratory Only national laboratory dedicated to renewable energy and energy efficiency R&D Research spans fundamental science to technology to policy and market solutions New Orleans Support: Funded by U.S. DOE to provide technical and policy expertise to assist in developing energy strategies for recovery and rebuild - Schools - Residential - Municipal - Energy Policy Presentation Overview * Strategic energy planning: why and how? * Next Steps for New Orleans Strategy Development * Suggestions for immediate implementation * Next steps for immediate implementation

32

RCRA facility investigation/corrective measures study work plan for the 200-UP-2 Operable Unit, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect

The 200-UP-2 Operable Unit is one of two source operable units at the U Plant Aggregate Area at the Hanford Site. Source operable units include waste management units and unplanned release sites that are potential sources of radioactive and/or hazardous substance contamination. This work plan, while maintaining the title RFI/CMS, presents the background and direction for conducting a limited field investigation in the 200-UP-2 Operable Unit, which is the first part of the process leading to final remedy selection. This report discusses the background, prior recommendations, goals, organization, and quality assurance for the 200-UP-2 Operable Unit Work Plan. The discussion begins with a summary of the regulatory framework and the role of the work plan. The specific recommendations leading into the work plan are then addressed. Next, the goals and organization of the report are discussed. Finally, the quality assurance and supporting documentation are presented.

Not Available

1993-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

33

RCRA Facility Investigation/Remedial Investigation Work Plan Addendum for the TNX Area Operable Unit Groundwater Radiological Characterization  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this document is to present a sampling and analysis plan for the Water Table Aquifer for purposes of obtaining additional data for remedial decision-making with respect to radioactive contamination in the groundwater.

Brewer, K.

2002-06-17T23:59:59.000Z

34

Presentations  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Presentations Presentations Basic Energy Sciences (BES) BES Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of BES Funding Opportunities Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (BESAC) News & Resources Program Summaries Brochures Reports Accomplishments Presentations BES and Congress Science for Energy Flow Seeing Matter Scale of Things Chart Contact Information Basic Energy Sciences U.S. Department of Energy SC-22/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3081 F: (301) 903-6594 E: sc.bes@science.doe.gov More Information » News & Resources Presentations Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Provided here are selected presentations given by the Director of BES since 2001 and some other related presentations. These are often large Powerpoint

35

Presentations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This page provides links to the presentations given at DOE Solid-State Lighting workshops and major conferences, as well as links to reference materials. Some of the following documents are...

36

Remedial Investigation Work Plan for J-Field, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of an RI/FS is to characterize the nature and extent of the risks posed by contaminants present at a site and to develop and evaluate options for remedial actions. The overall objective of the RI is to provide a comprehensive evaluation of site conditions, types and quantities of contaminants present, release mechanisms and migration pathways, target populations, and risks to human health and the environment. The information developed during the RI provides the basis for the design and implementation of remedial actions during the FS. The purpose of this RI Work Plan is to define the tasks that will direct the remedial investigation of the J-Field site at APG.

Benioff, P.; Biang, R.; Dolak, D.; Dunn, C.; Haffenden, R.; Martino, L.; Patton, T.; Wang, Y.; Yuen, C.

1995-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

37

Supplemental Investigation Plan for FFACO Use Restrictions, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

This document is part of an effort to re-evaluate all FFACO URs against the current RBCA criteria (referred to in this document as the Industrial Sites [IS] RBCA process) as defined in the Industrial Sites Project Establishment of Final Action Levels (NNSA/NSO, 2006a). After reviewing all of the existing FFACO URs, the 12 URs addressed in this Supplemental Investigation Plan (SIP) could not be evaluated against the current RBCA criteria as sufficient information about the contamination at each site was not available. This document presents the plan for conducting field investigations to obtain the needed information. This SIP includes URs from Corrective Action Units (CAUs) 326, 339, 358, 452, 454, 464, and 1010, located in Areas 2, 6, 12, 19, 25, and 29 of the Nevada Test Site, which is approximately 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada; and CAU 403, located in Area 3 of the Tonopah Test Range, which is approximately 165 miles north of Las Vegas, Nevada.

Lynn Kidman

2008-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

38

Department of Mechanical Engineering Presents: "Towards Optimal Investment, Planning and Control of Microgrids"  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

on the optimal investment, planning, and control of distributed micro-grids. A micro-grid is characterized by its.University campuses and emerging advanced sustainable communities are examples of micro-grids. Our planning

Keaveny, Tony

39

Presentations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Meeting Goals & Process Meeting Goals & Process December 26, 2012 | Author(s): Harvey Wasserman | Download File: LogisticsHarveyWasserman.pdf | pdf | 1.3 MB Meeting Goals & Process Liz Sexton---Kennedy: Present and Future Computing Requirements for CMS and ATLAS November 27, 2012 | Author(s): Liz Sexton---Kennedy (Fermilab) | Download File: LHC-Sexton-Kennedy.pdf | pdf | 638 KB Present and Future Computing Requirements for CMS and ATLAS Rob Roser and Tom LeCompte: Detector Simulations using GEANT 4 November 27, 2012 | Author(s): Rob Roser (Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory) and Tom LeCompte (ANL) | Download File: ROSER-NERSC.pdf | pdf | 2.2 MB Detector Simulations using GEANT 4 Scott Dodelson: The Dark Energy Survey (DES) November 27, 2012 | Author(s): Scott Dodelson (Fermilab) | Source: The Dark

40

PRESENT:  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

PUBLIC MEETING PUBLIC MEETING + + + + + FRIDAY NOVEMBER 14, 1997 + + + + + WASHINGTON, D.C. The Committee met in the Clark Room of the Capital Holiday Inn, 550 C Street, S.W., at 10:30 a.m., G. Campbell Watkins, Chair, presiding. PRESENT: G. CAMPBELL WATKINS, Chair DANIEL A. RELLES, Vice Chair DAVID R. BELLHOUSE R. SAMPRIT CHATTERJEE BRENDA G. COX CAROL A. GOTWAY CRAWFORD PHILIP HANSEN CALVIN KENT GRETA M. LJUNG ROY W. WHITMORE INVITED GUESTS: SEYMOUR SUDMAN RICHARD TABORS EIA STAFF PRESENT: JAY HAKES, EIA Administrator BILL WEINIG LYNDA CARLSON DAVID MOREHOUSE JOHN WOOD ART ANDERSON BOB MANICKE I N D E X Item: Page: World Oil Supply; Evidence from 4 Estimating Supply Functions by Country Questions from the Committee 54 Public Comments 62 Closing Comments by the Chair 67 P-R-O-C-E-E-D-I-N-G-S

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "investigation planning presentation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Presentations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Cameron Geddes: Plasma Accelerator Simulation Using Laser and Particle Cameron Geddes: Plasma Accelerator Simulation Using Laser and Particle Beam Drivers Author(s): Cameron Geddes (LBNL) | Download File: Geddes-LPA.pdf | pdf | 7.5 MB Plasma Accelerator Simulation Using Laser and Particle Beam Drivers Liz Sexton---Kennedy: Present and Future Computing Requirements for CMS and ATLAS November 27, 2012 | Author(s): Liz Sexton---Kennedy (Fermilab) | Download File: LHC-Sexton-Kennedy.pdf | pdf | 638 KB Present and Future Computing Requirements for CMS and ATLAS Rob Roser and Tom LeCompte: Detector Simulations using GEANT 4 November 27, 2012 | Author(s): Rob Roser (Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory) and Tom LeCompte (ANL) | Download File: ROSER-NERSC.pdf | pdf | 2.2 MB Detector Simulations using GEANT 4 Scott Dodelson: The Dark Energy Survey (DES)

42

Presentation to the EAC - Strategic Plan for DOE OE - Peter Bonner (Bill Parks)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Strategic Strategic Planning Process As Is/Situation Assessment Mission, Vision & Values Strategic Challenges Strategic Options/Choices Uncertainties/ Scenarios/ Constraints Strategic Goals, Objectives,& Actions Performance Measures & Accountability Strategic Plan Phase 2: Integration of Strategic Plan DOE-OE Strategic Planning Outcomes * Adaptive strategies and plans to lead OE into a sustainable future with clear performance indicators * External leadership in R&D, security, permitting/siting, and analytics/modeling * Internal clarity on OE strengths, cross-OE/DOE/government partnerships, organization capacity, and emerging leaders * Strategic direction, priorities, and commitment of resources consistent with direction and priorities * Alignment with tacit and explicit DOE mission and strategy

43

Presentations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

NERSC Role in Biological and Environmental Research NERSC Role in Biological and Environmental Research September 12, 2012 | Author(s): Kathy Yelick | Download File: NERSC-BER-Yelick.ppt | ppt | 35 MB Present and Future Computing Requirements for Computational Prediction of Protein-DNA Binding September 12, 2012 | Author(s): Mohammed AlQuraishi | Download File: AlQuraishi.pdf | pdf | 1 MB KBASE: Data and Modeling for Predictive Biology September 12, 2012 | Author(s): Tom Brettin and Shane Canon | Download File: KBaseBrettin.pdf | pdf | 5.9 MB DOE Joint Genome Institute September 11, 2012 | Download File: JGI.pdf | pdf | 8.4 MB 20th Century Reanalysis September 11, 2012 | Author(s): Gil Compo | Download File: Compo.pdf | pdf | 2.4 MB Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Protein Dynamics and Lignocellulosic Biomass

44

Presented  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

l* l* t , f , q.o Presented at the 20th International Pyrotechnics Seminar Colorado Springs, Colorado July 24-29, 1994 COMMENTS ON TNT EQUIVALENCE Paul W. Cooper Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, New Mexico U.S.A. 87185-1156 ABSTRACT The term "TNT Equivalence" is used throughout the explosives and related industries to compare the effects of the output of a given explosive to that of TNT. This is done for technical design reasons in scaling calculations such as for the prediction of blast waves, craters, and structural response, and is also used as a basis for government regulations controlling the shipping, handling and storage Of explosive materials, as well as for the siting and design of explosive facilities. TNT equivalence is determined experimentally by several different types of tests, the most common of which include: plate dent, ballistic mortar, trauzl,

45

Presentations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Protein Dynamics and Lignocellulosic Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Protein Dynamics and Lignocellulosic Biomass September 11, 2012 | Download File: PetridisNERSC12.pdf | pdf | 2.8 MB Subsurface Flow and Reactive Transport September 11, 2012 | Author(s): Tim Scheibe | Download File: Scheibe.pdf | pdf | 7.5 MB 20th Century Reanalysis September 11, 2012 | Author(s): Gil Compo | Download File: Compo.pdf | pdf | 2.4 MB Present and Future Computing Requirements for Computational Prediction of Protein-DNA Binding September 12, 2012 | Author(s): Mohammed AlQuraishi | Download File: AlQuraishi.pdf | pdf | 1 MB Climate Science for a Sustainable Energy Future September 11, 2012 | Author(s): David Bader | Download File: CSSEFBader.pdf | pdf | 21 MB KBASE: Data and Modeling for Predictive Biology September 12, 2012 | Author(s): Tom Brettin and Shane Canon |

46

Corrective action investigation plan: Area 2 Photo Skid 16 Wastewater Pit, Corrective Action Unit 332. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) contains a detailed description and plan for an environmental investigation of the Area 2 Photo Skid 16 Wastewater Pit. The site is located in Area 2 of the Nevada Test Site. The Photo Skid Wastewater Pit was used for disposal of photochemical process waste, and there is a concern that such disposal may have released photochemicals and metals to the soil beneath the pit and adjacent to it. The purpose of this investigation is to identify the presence and nature of contamination present in and adjacent to the wastewater pit and to determine the appropriate course of environmental response action for the site. The potential courses of action for the site are clean closure through remediation, closure in place (with or without remediation), or no further action.

NONE

1997-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

47

Work plan addendum for the remedial investigation and feasibility study of the Salmon Site  

SciTech Connect

This document is intended as an addendum to the Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS) Work Plan for the Salmon Site (SS) (formerly the Tatum Dome Test Site) Lamar County, Mississippi. The original work plan - Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study of the Tatum Dome Test Site, Lamar County, Mississippi (herein after called the Work Plan) was approved by the state of Mississippi in 1992 and was intended as the operative document for investigative activities at the Tatum Dome Test Site. Subsequent to the approval of the document a series of activities were undertaken under the auspices of the work plan. This document is organized in the same manner as the original work plan: (1) Introduction; (2) Site Background and History; (3) Initial Evaluation; (4) Data Quality Objectives; (5) RI/FS Tasks; (6) Project Schedule; (7) Project Management; and (8) Reference. This addendum will identify changes to the original work plan that are necessary because of additional information acquired at the SS. This document is not intended to replace the work plan, rather, it is intended to focus the remaining work in the context of additional site knowledge gained since the development of the original work plan. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is conducting a focused and phased site characterization as a part, of the RI/FS. The RI/FS is the methodology under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) for evaluating hazardous waste sites on the National Priorities List (NPL). The SS is not listed on the NPL, but DOE has voluntarily elected to conduct the evaluation of the SS in accordance with CERCLA.

NONE

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

48

Final work plan : investigation of potential contamination at the former USDA facility in Powhattan, Kansas.  

SciTech Connect

This Work Plan outlines the scope of work to be conducted to investigate the subsurface contaminant conditions at the property formerly leased by the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) in Powhattan, Kansas (Figure 1.1). Data obtained during this event will be used to (1) evaluate potential contaminant source areas on the property; (2) determine the vertical and horizontal extent of potential contamination; and (3) provide recommendations for future action, with the ultimate goal of assigning this site No Further Action status. The planned investigation includes groundwater monitoring requested by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE), in accordance with Section V of the Intergovernmental Agreement between the KDHE and the Farm Service Agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The work is being performed on behalf of the CCC/USDA by the Environmental Science Division of Argonne National Laboratory. A nonprofit, multidisciplinary research center operated by the University of Chicago for the U.S. Department of Energy, Argonne provides technical assistance to the CCC/USDA with environmental site characterization and remediation at former CCC/USDA grain storage facilities. Argonne issued a Master Work Plan (Argonne 2002) that has been approved by the KDHE. The Master Work Plan describes the general scope of all investigations at former CCC/USDA facilities in Kansas and provides guidance for these investigations. It should be consulted for the complete details of plans for work associated with the former CCC/USDA facility at Powhattan.

LaFreniere, L. M.; Environmental Science Division

2007-02-02T23:59:59.000Z

49

Investigation of Project Management Planning Practices for Renovation of Historical Buildings in Urban Contexts Located in Texas  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This study investigated the relationship between Project Management Planning (PMP) practices and project success for preservation projects of historical significance located in an urban context. The planning for these projects was also emphasized...

Escamilla, Edelmiro

2012-07-16T23:59:59.000Z

50

Planning & Investigating Plan an Investigation  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

feed ration? o Will using row covers affect the growth of lettuce? o Does the size of a propeller blade will ..... because... o The larger propeller blades will .... because... o Yogurt will culture better at ... degrees data collected at home to see if it might be a good location for a wind turbine. · Look for trends

New Hampshire, University of

51

Conclusions The research presented in this thesis examines the type of development framework required to plan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

the application of these ideas to an integrated building design system. The need for the tools and integrated framework required to plan and implement an integrated design system. The central premise is that existing years have been spent developing integrated design systems, their development frameworks all have major

Goodman, James R.

52

Presentation to the EAC: Annex 1 Global Smart Grid Inventory Progress and Plans - Eric Lightner  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Plans: and Plans: Annex 1 Global Smart Grid Inventory Eric Lightner, Annex 1 Lead (U.S. DOE) October 2012 Australia Korea Belgium The Netherlands Canada Russia China Spain Finland Sweden France Switzerland Ireland United Kingdom Italy United States Japan Operating Agent (as of August 2011) All 22 ISGAN signatories contributing data and information to Annex 1 Annex 1 Participants Task 1: Unified ISGAN framework for assessment of national-level motivating drivers and technology priorities for smart grids (completed with delivery of summary report) Task 2: Development and population of the initial project inventory with data content exchangeable with those in other existing smart grid databases (in progress) Task 3: Quantitative analysis on select inventory projects,

53

Presentation to the EAC - Smart Grid Subcommittee Work Plan Status - Joe Paladino & Wanda Reder  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Smart Grid Subcommittee Smart Grid Subcommittee Work Plan Status Joe Paladino - DOE Wanda Reder - EAC Smart Grid Sub- Committee Chair June 12, 2012 * Considerations: - Build from resulting from ARRA SGIG/SGDP project results that were awarded ~two years ago - EAC Smart Grid Sub-Committee role defined in the 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act * Approach: - Met with DOE in January 2012, May 2012 - Conference calls and iterations with Committee and DOE staff - Participated in Peer Review - Build upon DOE activity underway * Philosophy: - Work closely with DOE staff to find ways for EAC to add value - User priorities to focus efforts throughout 2012 2012 Smart Grid Work Plan Approach SGIG Spending EPRI Estimate Brattle Group Estimate $7.9 billion with cost share to be spent through 2015

54

Supply-Side Planning in Texas--Past, Present and Future  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. Improvements in power plant efficiencies and reduction of system losses represent a potential for savings that is equivalent to, or possibly greater than, the savings that can be achieved through conservation and load management. Recent rate ca ses before... with conservation. This paper discusses the aspects of energy efficiency which serve to enhance power plant efficiencies or reduce system losses. It also compares the plans submitted in 1984 and 1985 and discusses possible areas in which utilities can improve...

Hughes, H. L. Jr.

55

Work plan for the remedial investigation/feasibility study-environmental assessment for the Colonie site, Colonie, New York  

SciTech Connect

This work plan has been prepared to document the scoping and planning process performed by the US Department of Energy (DOE) to support remedial action activities at the Colonie site. The site is located in eastern New York State in the town of Colonie near the city of Albany. Remedial action of the Colonie site is being planned as part of DOE's Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program. The DOE is responsible for controlling the release of all radioactive and chemical contaminants from the site. Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), a remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) must be prepared to support the decision-making process for evaluating remedial action alternatives. This work plan contains a summary of information known about the site as of January 1988, presents a conceptual site model that identifies potential routes of human exposure to site containments, identifies data gaps, and summarizes the process and proposed studies that will be used to fill the data gaps. In addition, DOE activities must be conducted in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which requires consideration of the environmental consequences of a proposed action as part of its decision-making process. This work also describes the approach that will be used to evaluate potential remedial action alternatives and includes a description of the organization, project controls, and task schedules that will be employed to fulfill the requirements of both CERCLA and NEPA. 48 refs., 18 figs., 25 tabs.

Not Available

1990-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

56

March 30, 2010, Face to Face Meeting Presentation - DOE FTCP FY10 Operational Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Federal Technical Capability Panel DOE Federal Technical Capability Panel FY10 Operational Plan G l 1 Obj ti 2 Goal 1 Objective 2: Define and implement a standard approach for continuing technical training for personnel in the continuing technical training for personnel in the TQP March 2010 Mark Sundie and Carol Ingram, Co-champions g , p Objectives for Today Goal 1 Objective 2 Goals for Face-to-Face: Goal 1 Objective 2 Goals for Face to Face: Obtain approval of revised wording Obtain approval of revised wording * Obtain FTCP input and buy-in on path forward: forward: Brief Panel on Status of Objective 2 Ensure that outcomes support DOE long-term mission pp g needs and provide management flexibility in TQP implementation G1 O2 Summary Face to Face Mar2010 FINAL Carol Ingram, NNSA/LSO

57

Corrective action investigation plan for CAU Number 453: Area 9 Landfill, Tonopah Test Range  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) contains the environmental sample collection objectives and criteria for conducting site investigation activities at the Area 9 Landfill, Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 453/Corrective Action (CAS) 09-55-001-0952, which is located at the Tonopah Test Range (TTR). The TTR, included in the Nellis Air Force Range, is approximately 255 kilometers (140 miles) northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. The Area 9 Landfill is located northwest of Area 9 on the TTR. The landfill cells associated with CAU 453 were excavated to receive waste generated from the daily operations conducted at Area 9 and from range cleanup which occurred after test activities.

NONE

1997-05-14T23:59:59.000Z

58

PNNL Apatite Investigation at 100-NR-2 Quality Assurance Project Plan  

SciTech Connect

In 2004, the U.S. Department of Energy, Fluor Hanford, Inc., Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), and the Washington Department of Ecology agreed that the long-term strategy for groundwater remediation at the 100-N Area would include apatite sequestration as the primary treatment, followed by a secondary treatment if necessary. Since then, the agencies have worked together to agree on which apatite sequestration technology has the greatest chance of reducing strontium-90 flux to the Columbia River. This Quality Assurance Project Plan provides the quality assurance requirements and processes that will be followed by staff working on the PNNL Apatite Investigation at 100-NR-2 Project. The plan is designed to be used exclusively by project staff.

Fix, N. J.

2009-04-02T23:59:59.000Z

59

Addendum to the East Tennessee Technology Park Site-Wide Residual Contamination Remedial Investigation Work Plan Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

SciTech Connect

The East Tennessee Technology Park Site-Wide Residual Contamination Remedial Investigation Work Plan (DOE 2004) describes the planned fieldwork to support the remedial investigation (RI) for residual contamination at the East Tennessee Technology Park (ETTP) not addressed in previous Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) decisions. This Addendum describes activities that will be conducted to gather additional information in Zone 1 of the ETTP for groundwater, surface water, and sediments. This Addendum has been developed from agreements reached in meetings held on June 23, 2010, August 25, 2010, October 13, 2010, November 13, 2010, December 1, 2010, and January 13, 2011, with representatives of the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE), U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC). Based on historical to recent groundwater data for ETTP and the previously completed Sitewide Remedial Investigation for the ETTP (DOE 2007a), the following six areas of concern have been identified that exhibit groundwater contamination downgradient of these areas above state of Tennessee and EPA drinking water maximum contaminant levels (MCLs): (1) K-720 Fly Ash Pile, (2) K-770 Scrap Yard, (3) Duct Island, (4) K-1085 Firehouse Burn/J.A. Jones Maintenance Area, (5) Contractor's Spoil Area (CSA), and (6) Former K-1070-A Burial Ground. The paper presents a brief summary of the history of the areas, the general conceptual models for the observed groundwater contamination, and the data gaps identified.

SAIC

2011-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

60

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 135: Area 25 Underground Storage Tanks, Nevada Test Site, Nevada  

SciTech Connect

This CAIP presents a plan to investigate the nature and extent of the contaminants of potential concern (COPCs) at CAU 135. The purpose of the corrective action investigation described in this CAIP is to: (1) Identify the presence and nature of COPCs; (2) Determine the location of radiological contamination within the vault and determine the extent of COPCs in the sump area and on the floor; and (3) Provide sufficient information and data to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAS 25-02-01. This CAIP was developed using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Data Quality Objectives (DQOs) (EPA, 1994) process to clearly define the goals for collecting environmental data, to determine data uses, and to design a data collection program that will satisfy these uses. A DQO scoping meeting was held prior to preparation of this plan; a brief summary of the DQOs is presented in Section 3.4. A more detailed summary of the DQO process and results is included in Appendix A.

DOE/NV

1999-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "investigation planning presentation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Remedial Investigation Work Plan for Upper East Fork Poplar Creek Operable Unit 3 at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Environmental Restoration Program  

SciTech Connect

Upper East Fork Popular Creek Operable Unit 3 (UEFPC OU 3) is a source term OU composed of seven sites, and is located in the western portion of the Y-12 Plant. For the most part, the UEFPC OU 3 sites served unrelated purposes and are geographically removed from one another. The seven sites include the following: Building 81-10, the S-2 Site, Salvage Yard oil storage tanks, the Salvage Yard oil/solvent drum storage area, Tank Site 2063-U, the Salvage Yard drum deheader, and the Salvage Yard scrap metal storage area. All of these sites are contaminated with at least one or more hazardous and/or radioactive chemicals. All sites have had some previous investigation under the Y-12 Plant RCRA Program. The work plan contains summaries of geographical, historical, operational, geological, and hydrological information specific to each OU 3 site. The potential for release of contaminants to receptors through various media is addressed, and a sampling and analysis plan is presented to obtain objectives for the remedial investigation. Proposed sampling activities are contingent upon the screening level risk assessment, which includes shallow soil sampling, soil borings, monitoring well installation, groundwater sampling, and surface water sampling. Data from the site characterization activities will be used to meet the above objectives. A Field Sampling Investigation Plan, Health and Safety Plan, and Waste Management Plan are also included in this work plan.

Not Available

1993-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

62

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 562: Waste Systems Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit 562 is located in Areas 2, 23, and 25 of the Nevada Test Site, which is approximately 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. Corrective Action Unit 562 is comprised of the 13 corrective action sites (CASs) listed below: 02-26-11, Lead Shot 02-44-02, Paint Spills and French Drain 02-59-01, Septic System 02-60-01, Concrete Drain 02-60-02, French Drain 02-60-03, Steam Cleaning Drain 02-60-04, French Drain 02-60-05, French Drain 02-60-06, French Drain 02-60-07, French Drain 23-60-01, Mud Trap Drain and Outfall 23-99-06, Grease Trap 25-60-04, Building 3123 Outfalls These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives. Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation before evaluating corrective action alternatives and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each CAS. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable corrective action alternatives that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document. The sites will be investigated based on the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on December 11, 2008, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection; U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office; Stoller-Navarro Joint Venture; and National Security Technologies, LLC. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAU 562. Appendix A provides a detailed discussion of the DQO methodology and the DQOs specific to each CAS. The scope of the corrective action investigation for CAU 562 includes the following activities: Move surface debris and/or materials, as needed, to facilitate sampling. Conduct radiological surveys. Perform field screening. Collect and submit environmental samples for laboratory analysis to determine the nature and extent of any contamination released by each CAS. Collect samples of source material to determine the potential for a release. Collect samples of potential remediation wastes. Collect quality control samples. This Corrective Action Investigation Plan has been developed in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order that was agreed to by the State of Nevada; DOE, Environmental Management; U.S. Department of Defense; and DOE, Legacy Management (FFACO, 1996; as amended February 2008). Under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, this Corrective Action Investigation Plan will be submitted to the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for approval. Fieldwork will be conducted following approval of the plan.

Alfred Wickline

2009-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

63

Repository sealing plan for the Nevada Nuclear Waste Storage Investigations Project, fiscal years 1984 through 1990  

SciTech Connect

This report presents a plan to develop acceptable sealing methods for a prospective nuclear waste repository in unsaturated tuff in Yucca Mountain, which is on and adjacent to the Nevada Test Site. Sealing is the permanent closure of the underground facility, shafts, ramps, and boreholes. Questiona associated with the performance of the sealing system form the basis for this plan. Tasks that contribute to the resolution of these questions and support the documentation required for the construction authorization application are proposed. The approach to answering the performance-related questions is divided into six steps: (1) assess the need for sealing, (2) define the design requirements, (3) measure the material properties, (4) assess the performance of sealing designs, (5) perform laboratory analyses and field testing, and (6) reassess the performance of sealing designs. Organization of the tasks supporting each step is illustrated by detailed work-flow diagrams.

Fernandez, J.A.

1985-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

64

Investigation of Bio-Ethanol Steam Reforming over Cobalt-based Catalysts (Presentation)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presented at the 2007 Bio-Derived Liquids to Hydrogen Distributed Reforming Working Group held November 6, 2007 in Laurel, Maryland.

65

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 145: Wells and Storage Holes, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Rev. No.: 0  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) contains project-specific information for conducting site investigation activities at Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 145: Wells and Storage Holes. Information presented in this CAIP includes facility descriptions, environmental sample collection objectives, and criteria for the selection and evaluation of environmental samples. Corrective Action Unit 145 is located in Area 3 of the Nevada Test Site, which is 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. Corrective Action Unit 145 is comprised of the six Corrective Action Sites (CASs) listed below: (1) 03-20-01, Core Storage Holes; (2) 03-20-02, Decon Pad and Sump; (3) 03-20-04, Injection Wells; (4) 03-20-08, Injection Well; (5) 03-25-01, Oil Spills; and (6) 03-99-13, Drain and Injection Well. These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives. Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation (CAI) prior to evaluating corrective action alternatives and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each CAS. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable corrective action alternatives that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document. One conceptual site model with three release scenario components was developed for the six CASs to address all releases associated with the site. The sites will be investigated based on data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on June 24, 2004, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection; U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office; Stoller-Navarro Joint Venture; and Bechtel Nevada. The DQOs process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAU 145.

David A. Strand

2004-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

66

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 554: Area 23 Release Site, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Rev. No.: 0  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) contains project-specific information for conducting site investigation activities at Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 554: Area 23 Release Site, Nevada Test Site, Nevada. Information presented in this CAIP includes facility descriptions, environmental sample collection objectives, and criteria for the selection and evaluation of environmental samples. Corrective Action Unit 554 is located in Area 23 of the Nevada Test Site, which is 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. Corrective Action Unit 554 is comprised of one Corrective Action Site (CAS), which is: 23-02-08, USTs 23-115-1, 2, 3/Spill 530-90-002. This site consists of soil contamination resulting from a fuel release from underground storage tanks (USTs). Corrective Action Site 23-02-08 is being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives. Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation prior to evaluating corrective action alternatives and selecting the appropriate corrective action for this CAS. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable corrective action alternatives that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document for CAU 554. Corrective Action Site 23-02-08 will be investigated based on the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on July 15, 2004, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection; U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office; and contractor personnel. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAU 554.

David A. Strand

2004-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

67

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 565: Stored Samples, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Rev. No.: 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 565 is located in Area 26 of the Nevada Test Site, which is 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. Corrective Action Unit 565 is comprised of one corrective action site (CAS) listed--CAS 26-99-04, Ground Zero Soil Samples. This site is being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend closure of CAU 565. Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation before evaluating closure objectives and selecting the appropriate corrective action. The results of the field investigation will support closure and waste management decisions that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report. The site will be investigated based on the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on June 1, 2006, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection; U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office; Stoller-Navarro Joint Venture; and Bechtel Nevada. The DQO process was utilized to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate closure for CAU 565. Appendix A provides a detailed discussion of the DQO methodology and the DQOs specific to this CAS. The scope of the corrective action investigation for CAU 565 includes the following activities: (1) Remove stored samples, shelves, and debris from the interior of Building 26-2106. (2) Perform field screening on stored samples, shelves, and debris. (3) Dispose of stored samples, shelves, and debris. (4) Collect samples of investigation-derived waste, as needed, for waste management purposes. (5) Conduct radiological surveys of Building 26-2106 in accordance with the requirements in the ''NV/YMP Radiological Control Manual'' to determine if there is residual radiological contamination that would prevent the release of the building for unrestricted use. This Corrective Action Investigation has been developed in accordance with the ''Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order'' that was agreed to by the State of Nevada, the U.S. Department of Energy, and the U.S. Department of Defense. Under the ''Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order'', this Corrective Action Investigation Plan will be submitted to the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for approval. Field work will be conducted following approval of the plan.

Wickline, Alfred; McCall, Robert

2006-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

68

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for the CNTA Subsurface Sites (CAU Number 443), Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) describes the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) planned environmental investigation of the subsurface Central Nevada Test Area (CNTA) Corrective Action Unit (CAU) No. 443. The CNTA is located in Hot Creek Valley in Nye County, Nevada, adjacent to U.S. Highway 6, about 48 kilometers (km) (30 miles [mi]) north of Warm Springs, Nevada. The CNTA was the site of Project Faultless, a nuclear device detonated in the subsurface by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) in January 1968. The purposes of this test were to gauge the seismic effects of a relatively large, high-yield detonation completed in Hot Creek Valley (outside the Nevada Test Site) and to determine the suitability of the site for future large detonations. The yield of the Faultless test was between 200 kilotons and 1 megaton. Two similar tests were planned for the CNTA, but neither of them was completed. Based on the general definition of a corrective action investigation (CAI) from Section IV.14 of the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO), the purpose of the CAI is ''to gather data sufficient to characterize the nature, extent, and rate of migration or potential rate of migration from releases or discharges of pollutants or contaminants and/or potential releases or discharges from corrective action units identified at the facilities''. For CNTA CAU 443 the concepts developed for the Underground Test Area (UGTA) CAUs will be applied on a limited scale. For the UGTA CAUs, ''the objective of the CAI process is to define boundaries around each UGTA CAU that establish areas that contain water that may be unsafe for domestic and municipal use,'' as stated in Appendix VI of the FFACO (1996). Based on this strategy the CAI for CAU 443 will start with modeling using existing data. New data collection activities are generally contingent upon the results of the modeling and may or may not be part of the CAI. Specific objectives of the CAI ar e as follows: (1) determine the characteristics of the groundwater flow system, the sources of contamination, and the transport processes to acceptable levels of uncertainty; (2) develop a credible numerical model of groundwater flow and contaminant transport for the UC-1 Subsurface Corrective Action Site (CAS) and downgradient areas; and, (3) develop stochastic predictions of the contaminant boundary at an acceptable level of uncertainty.

USDOE/NV

1999-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

69

Environmental, Safety, and Health Plan for the remedial investigation of the liquid low-level waste tanks at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Environmental Restoration Program  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental, Safety, and Health (ES&H) Plan presents the concepts and methodologies to be used during the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) RI/FS project to protect the health and safety of employees, the public, and the environment. The ES&H Plan acts as a management extension for ORNL and Energy Systems to direct and control implementation of the project ES&H program. This report describes the program philosophy, requirements, quality assurance measures, and methods for applying the ES&H program to individual task remedial investigations, project facilities, and other major tasks assigned to the project.

Not Available

1991-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

70

Environmental, Safety, and Health Plan for the remedial investigation of the liquid low-level waste tanks at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental, Safety, and Health (ES H) Plan presents the concepts and methodologies to be used during the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) RI/FS project to protect the health and safety of employees, the public, and the environment. The ES H Plan acts as a management extension for ORNL and Energy Systems to direct and control implementation of the project ES H program. This report describes the program philosophy, requirements, quality assurance measures, and methods for applying the ES H program to individual task remedial investigations, project facilities, and other major tasks assigned to the project.

Not Available

1991-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

71

Investigation of Bio-Ethanol Steam Reforming over Cobalt-based Catalysts (Presentation)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Bio-Derived Liquids to Hydrogen Distributed DOE Bio-Derived Liquids to Hydrogen Distributed Reforming Working Group (BILIWG) Meeting Investigation of Bio-Ethanol Steam Reforming over Cobalt-based Catalysts Hua Song Lingzhi Zhang Umit S. Ozkan* November 6 th , 2007 Heterogeneous Catalysis Research Group Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering The Ohio State University Columbus, OH 43210 *Ozkan.1@osu.edu Biomass to Hydrogen (Environmentally Friendly) Plant cultivation Plant cultivation Saccharification Saccharification / / Fermentation Fermentation Anaerobic digestion Anaerobic digestion Residues of Residues of agroindustries agroindustries and cultivations and cultivations Municipal Solid Waste Municipal Solid Waste (organic fraction) (organic fraction) Distillation Distillation Reformation of ethanol

72

Investigation of Neutrino Properties in Experiments at Nuclear Reactors: Present Status and Prospects  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This paper was submitted in Russian edition of Journal Physics of Atomic Nuclei in 2001. The present status of experiments that are being performed at nuclear reactors in order to seek the neutrino masses, mixing, and magnetic moments, whose discovery would be a signal of the existence of physics beyond the Standard Model, is considered, along with their future prospects.

L. A. Mikaelyan

2002-10-03T23:59:59.000Z

73

Health and safety plan for the Remedial Investigation and Site Investigation of Waste Area Grouping 2 at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Environmental Restoration Program  

SciTech Connect

This health and safety plan (HASP) was developed by the members of the Measurement Applications and Development Group of the Health Science Research Division at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). This plan was prepared to ensure that health and safety related items for the Waste Area Grouping (WAG) 2 Remedial Investigation (RI)/Feasibility Study and Site Investigation projects conform with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.120 (April 18, 1992). The RI Plan calls for the characterization, monitoring, risk assessment, and identification of remedial needs and alternatives that have been structured and staged with short-term and long-term objectives. In early FY 1992, the WAG 2 RI was integrated with the ORNL Environmental Restoration (ER) Site Investigations program in order to achieve the complimentary objectives of the projects more effectively by providing an integrated basis of support. The combined effort was named the WAG 2 Remedial Investigation and Site Investigations Program (WAG 2 RI&SI). The Site Investigation activities are a series of monitoring efforts and directed investigations that support other ER activities by providing information about (1) watershed hydrogeology; (2) contaminants, pathways, and fluxes for groundwater at ORNL; (3) shallow subsurface areas that can act as secondary sources of contaminants; and (4) biological populations and contaminants in biota, in addition to other support and coordination activities.

Cofer, G.H.; Holt, V.L.; Roupe, G.W.

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

74

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 543: Liquid Disposal Units, Nevada Test Site, Nevada: Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

The general purpose of this Corrective Action Investigation Plan is to ensure that adequate data are collected to provide sufficient and reliable information to identify, evaluate, and select technically viable corrective action alternatives (CAAs) for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 543: Liquid Disposal Units, Nevada Test Site (NTS), Nevada. Located in Areas 6 and 15 on the NTS, CAU 543 is comprised of a total of seven corrective action sites (CASs), one in Area 6 and six in Area 15. The CAS in Area 6 consists of a Decontamination Facility and its components which are associated with decontamination of equipment, vehicles, and materials related to nuclear testing. The six CASs in Area 15 are located at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Farm and are related to waste disposal activities at the farm. Sources of possible contamination at Area 6 include potentially contaminated process waste effluent discharged through a process waste system, a sanitary waste stream generated within buildings of the Decon Facility, and radiologically contaminated materials stored within a portion of the facility yard. At Area 15, sources of potential contamination are associated with the dairy operations and the animal tests and experiments involving radionuclide uptake. Identified contaminants of potential concern include volatile organic compounds, semivolatile organic compounds, petroleum hydrocarbons, pesticides, herbicides, polychlorinated biphenyls, metals, and radionuclides. Three corrective action closure alternatives - No Further Action, Close in Place, or Clean Closure - will be recommended for CAU 543 based on an evaluation of all the data quality objective-related data. Field work will be conducted following approval of the plan. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of CAAs that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office

2004-05-03T23:59:59.000Z

75

Site characterization plan: Conceptual design report: Volume 6, Drawing portfolio: Nevada Nuclear Waste Storage Investigations Project  

SciTech Connect

This document presents a description of a prospective geologic repository for high-level radioactive waste to support the development of the Site Characterization Plan for the Yucca Mountain site. The site for the prospective repository is located at Yucca Mountain in southwestern Nevada, and the waste emplacement area will be constructed in the underlying volcanic tuffs. The target horizon for waste emplacement is a sloping bed of densely welded tuff more than 650 ft below the surface and typically more than 600 ft above the water table. The conceptual design described in this report is unique among repository designs in that it uses ramps in addition to shafts to gain access to the underground facility, the emplacement horizon is located above the water table, and it is possible that 300- to 400-ft-long horizontal waste emplacement boreholes will be used. This report summarizes the design bases, design and performance criteria, and the design analyses performed. The current status of meeting the preclosure performance objectives for licensing and of resolving the repository design and preclosure issues is presented. The repository design presented in this report will be expanded and refined during the advanced conceptual design, the license application design, and the final procurement and construction design phases. Volume 6 contains drawings. 114 figs.

MacDougall, H.R.; Scully, L.W.; Tillerson, J.R. (comps.)

1987-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

76

An investigation into positron emission tomography contouring methods across two treatment planning systems  

SciTech Connect

Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has been used to provide additional information regarding patient tumor location, size, and staging for radiotherapy treatment planning purposes. This additional information reduces interobserver variability and produces more consistent contouring. It is well recognized that different contouring methodology for PET data results in different contoured volumes. The goal of this study was to compare the difference in PET contouring methods for 2 different treatment planning systems using a phantom dataset and a series of patient datasets. Contouring methodology was compared on the ADAC Pinnacle Treatment Planning System and the CMS XiO Treatment Planning System. Contours were completed on the phantom and patient datasets using a number of PET contouring methodsthe standardized uptake value 2.5 method, 30%, 40%, and 50% of the maximum uptake method and the signal to background ratio method. Differences of >15% were observed for PET-contoured volumes between the different treatment planning systems for the same data and the same PET contouring methodology. Contoured volume differences between treatment planning systems were caused by differences in data formatting and display and the different contouring tools available. Differences in treatment planning system as well as contouring methodology should be considered carefully in dose-volume contouring and reporting, especially between centers that may use different treatment planning systems or those that have several different treatment planning systems.

Young, Tony, E-mail: Tony.Young@sswahs.nsw.gov.au [Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, New South Wales (Australia); Som, Seu [Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Liverpool Hospital, New South Wales (Australia); South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, New South Wales (Australia); Sathiakumar, Chithradevi [Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Liverpool Hospital, New South Wales (Australia); Holloway, Lois [Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, New South Wales (Australia); Institute of Medical Physics, University of Sydney, New South Wales (Australia); Center for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, New South Wales (Australia)

2013-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

77

[Environmental investigation of ground water contamination at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio]. Volume 3, Sampling and analysis plan (SAP): Phase 1, Task 4, Field Investigation: Draft  

SciTech Connect

In April 1990, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (WPAFB), initiated an investigation to evaluate a potential Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) removal action to prevent, to the extent practicable, the offsite migration of contaminated ground water from WPAFB. WPAFB retained the services of the Environmental Management Operations (EMO) and its principle subcontractor, International Technology Corporation (IT) to complete Phase 1 of the environmental investigation of ground-water contamination at WPAFB. Phase 1 of the investigation involves the short-term evaluation and potential design for a program to remove ground-water contamination that appears to be migrating across the western boundary of Area C, and across the northern boundary of Area B along Springfield Pike. Primarily, Task 4 of Phase 1 focuses on collection of information at the Area C and Springfield Pike boundaries of WPAFB. This Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) has been prepared to assist in completion of the Task 4 field investigation and is comprised of the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) and the Field Sampling Plan (FSP).

Not Available

1991-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

78

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 375: Area 30 Buggy Unit Craters, Nevada Test Site, Nevada  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 375 is located in Areas 25 and 30 of the Nevada Test Site, which is approximately 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. Corrective Action Unit 375 comprises the two corrective action sites (CASs) listed below: 25-23-22, Contaminated Soils Site 30-45-01, U-30a, b, c, d, e Craters Existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination present at the CAU 375 CASs is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives (CAAs). This document details an investigation plan that will provide for the gathering of sufficient information to evaluate and recommend CAAs. Corrective Action Site 25-23-22 is composed of the releases associated with nuclear rocket testing at Test Cell A (TCA). Test Cell A was used to test and develop nuclear rocket motors as part of the Nuclear Rocket Development Station from its construction in 1958 until 1966, when rocket testing began being conducted at Test Cell C. The rocket motors were built with an unshielded nuclear reactor that produced as much as 1,100 kilowatts (at full power) to heat liquid hydrogen to 4,000 degrees Fahrenheit, at which time the expanded gases were focused out a nozzle to produce thrust. The fuel rods in the reactor were not clad and were designed to release fission fragments to the atmosphere, but due to vibrations and loss of cooling during some operational tests, fuel fragments in excess of planned releases became entrained in the exhaust and spread in the immediate surrounding area. Cleanup efforts have been undertaken at times to collect the fuel rod fragments and other contamination. Previous environmental investigations in the TCA area have resulted in the creation of a number of use restrictions. The industrial area of TCA is encompassed by a fence and is currently posted as a radioactive material area. Corrective Action Site 30-45-01 (releases associated with the Buggy Plowshare test) is located in Area 30 on Chukar Mesa. It was a Plowshare test where five nuclear devices were buried 140 feet (ft) deep in a row at 150-ft intervals. These devices were detonated on March 12, 1968, to produce a trench 254 ft wide, 865 ft long, and 70 ft deep. The mesa where the test was conducted is surrounded on three sides by ravines, and the entire end of the mesa is fenced and posted as a contamination area. These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend CAAs. Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation before evaluating CAAs and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each CAS. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable CAAs that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document. The sites will be investigated based on the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on December 2, 2009, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAU 375.

Patrick Matthews

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

79

Corrective Action Investigation plan for Corrective Action Unit 263: Area 25 Building 4839 Leachfield, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, March 1999  

SciTech Connect

The Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 263, the Area 25 Building 4839 Leachfield, has been developed in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order that was agreed to by the US Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office; the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection; and the US Department of Defense. Corrective Action Unit 263 is comprised of the Corrective Action Site 25-05-04 sanitary leachfield and associated collection system. This Corrective Action Investigation Plan is used in combination with the Work Plan for Leachfield Corrective Action Units: Nevada Test Site and Tonopah Test Range, Nevada (DOE/NV, 1998d). The Leachfield Work Plan was developed to streamline investigations at Leachfield Corrective Action Units by incorporating management, technical, quality assurance, health and safety, public involvement, field sampling, and waste management information common to a set of Corrective Action Units with similar site histories and characteristics into a single document that can be referenced. This Corrective Action Investigation Plan provides investigative details specific to Corrective Action Unit 263. Corrective Action Unit 263 is located southwest of Building 4839, in the Central Propellant Storage Area. Operations in Building 4839 from 1968 to 1996 resulted in effluent releases to the leachfield and associated collection system. In general, effluent released to the leachfield consisted of sanitary wastewater from a toilet, urinal, lavatory, and drinking fountain located within Building 4839. The subsurface soils in the vicinity of the collection system and leachfield may have been impacted by effluent containing contaminants of potential concern generated by support activities associated with the Building 4839 operations.

ITLV

1999-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

80

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 335: Area 6 Injection Well and Drain Pit, Nevada Test Site, Nevada  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan contains the U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office's approach to collect the data necessary to evaluate corrective action alternatives appropriate for the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 335, Area 6 Injection Well and Drain Pit, under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Corrective Action Unit 335 consists of three Corrective Action Sites (CASs). The CAU is located in the Well 3 Yard in Area 6 at the Nevada Test Site. Historical records indicate that the Drain Pit (CAS 06-23-03) received effluent from truck-washing; the Drums/Oil Waste/Spill (CAS 06-20-01) consisted of four 55-gallon drums containing material removed from the Cased Hole; and the Cased Hole (CAS 06-20-02) was used for disposal of used motor oil, wastewater, and debris. These drums were transported to the Area 5 Hazardous Waste Accumulation Site in July 1991; therefore, they are no longer on site and further investigation or remediation efforts are not required. Consequently, CAS 06-20-01 will be closed with no further action and details of this decision will be described in the Closure Report for this CAU. Any spills that may have been associated with this CAS will be investigated and addressed under CAS 06-20-02. Field investigation efforts will be focused on the two remaining CASs. The scope of the investigation will center around identifying any contaminants of potential concern (COPCs) and, if present, determining the vertical and lateral extent of contamination. The COPCs for the Drain Pit include: total volatile/ semivolatile organic compounds, total petroleum hydrocarbons (gasoline-and diesel-range organics), ethylene glycol monobutyl ether, polychlorinated biphenyls, total Resource Conservation and Recovery Act metals, and radionuclides. The COPCs for the Cased Hole include: total volatile/ semivolatile organic compounds, total petroleum hydrocarbons (diesel-range organics only), and total Resource Conservation an d Recovery Act metals. Both biased surface and subsurface soil sampling will be conducted, augmented by visual inspection, video surveys, and electromagnetic surveys. The results of this field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of corrective action alternatives in the corrective action decision document.

DOE/NV

2000-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "investigation planning presentation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Remedial investigation sampling and analysis plan for J-Field, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland. Volume 1: Field Sampling Plan  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Management Division (EMD) of Aberdeen Proving Ground (APG), Maryland, is conducting a remedial investigation and feasibility study (RI/FS) of the J-Field area at APG pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended. J-Field is within the Edgewood Area of APG in Harford County, Maryland (Figure 1. 1). Since World War II activities in the Edgewood Area have included the development, manufacture, testing, and destruction of chemical agents and munitions. These materials were destroyed at J-Field by open burning and open detonation (OB/OD). Considerable archival information about J-Field exists as a result of efforts by APG staff to characterize the hazards associated with the site. Contamination of J-Field was first detected during an environmental survey of the Edgewood Area conducted in 1977 and 1978 by the US Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency (USATHAMA) (predecessor to the US Army Environmental Center [AEC]). As part of a subsequent USATHAMA -environmental survey, 11 wells were installed and sampled at J-Field. Contamination at J-Field was also detected during a munitions disposal survey conducted by Princeton Aqua Science in 1983. The Princeton Aqua Science investigation involved the installation and sampling of nine wells and the collection and analysis of surficial and deep composite soil samples. In 1986, a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) permit (MD3-21-002-1355) requiring a basewide RCRA Facility Assessment (RFA) and a hydrogeologic assessment of J-Field was issued by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In 1987, the US Geological Survey (USGS) began a two-phased hydrogeologic assessment in data were collected to model, groundwater flow at J-Field. Soil gas investigations were conducted, several well clusters were installed, a groundwater flow model was developed, and groundwater and surface water monitoring programs were established that continue today.

Benioff, P.; Biang, R.; Dolak, D.; Dunn, C.; Martino, L.; Patton, T.; Wang, Y.; Yuen, C.

1995-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

82

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 309: Area 12 Muckpiles, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Rev. No.: 0  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) contains project-specific information including facility descriptions, environmental sample collection objectives, and criteria for conducting site investigation activities at Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 309, Area 12 Muckpiles, Nevada Test Site (NTS), Nevada. This CAIP has been developed in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) (1996) that was agreed to by the State of Nevada, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), and the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD). Corrective Action Unit 309 is located in Area 12 of the NTS, which is approximately 65 miles (mi) northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada (Figure 1-1). Area 12 is approximately 40 mi beyond the main gate to the NTS. Corrective Action Unit 309 is comprised of the three Corrective Action Sites (CASs) shown on Figure 1-1 and listed below: CAS 12-06-09, Muckpile; CAS 12-08-02, Contaminated Waste Dump (CWD); and CAS 12-28-01, I, J, and K-Tunnel Debris. Corrective Action Sites 12-06-09 and 12-08-02 will be collectively referred to as muckpiles in this document. Corrective Action Site 12-28-01 will be referred to as the fallout plume because of the extensive lateral area of debris and fallout contamination resulting from the containment failures of the J-and K-Tunnels. The corrective action investigation (CAI) will include field inspections, radiological surveys, and media sampling, where appropriate. Data will also be obtained to support waste management decisions. The CASs in CAU 309 are being investigated because hazardous and/or radioactive constituents may be present in concentrations that could potentially pose a threat to human health and/or the environment. Existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination at these sites are insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives for the CASs. Therefore, additional information will be obtained by conducting a CAI prior to evaluating corrective action alternatives and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each CAS.

David A. Strand

2004-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

83

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 371: Johnnie Boy Crater and Pin Stripe Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 371 is located in Areas 11 and 18 of the Nevada Test Site, which is approximately 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. Corrective Action Unit 371 is comprised of the two corrective action sites (CASs) listed below: 11-23-05, Pin Stripe Contamination Area 18-45-01, U-18j-2 Crater (Johnnie Boy) These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives. Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation before evaluating corrective action alternatives and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each CAS. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable corrective action alternatives that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document. The sites will be investigated based on the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on November 19, 2008, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection; U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office; Stoller-Navarro Joint Venture; and National Security Technologies, LLC. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAU 371. Appendix A provides a detailed discussion of the DQO methodology and the DQOs specific to each CAS. The scope of the corrective action investigation for CAU 371 includes the following activities: Move surface debris and/or materials, as needed, to facilitate sampling. Conduct radiological surveys. Measure in situ external dose rates using thermoluminescent dosimeters or other dose measurement devices. Collect and submit environmental samples for laboratory analysis to determine internal dose rates. Combine internal and external dose rates to determine whether total dose rates exceed final action levels (FALs). Collect and submit environmental samples for laboratory analysis to determine whether chemical contaminants are present at concentrations exceeding FALs. If contamination exceeds FALs, define the extent of the contamination exceeding FALs. Investigate waste to determine whether potential source material is present. This Corrective Action Investigation Plan has been developed in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order that was agreed to by the State of Nevada; U.S. Department of Energy; and U.S. Department of Defense. Under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, this Corrective Action Investigation Plan will be submitted to the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for approval. Fieldwork will be conducted following approval of the plan.

Patrick Matthews

2009-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

84

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 511: Waste Dumps (Piles & Debris), Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Rev. No.: 0 with ROTC 1  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 511: Waste Dumps (Piles & Debris), Nevada Test Site, Nevada, has been developed in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order that was agreed to by the State of Nevada, U.S. Department of Energy, and the U.S. Department of Defense. The general purpose of the investigation is to ensure adequate data are collected to provide sufficient and reliable information to identify, evaluate, and select viable corrective actions. This Corrective Action Investigation Plan provides investigative details for CAU 511, whereas programmatic aspects of this project are discussed in the ''Project Management Plan'' (DOE/NV, 1994). General field and laboratory quality assurance and quality control issues are presented in the ''Industrial Sites Quality Assurance Project Plan'' (NNSA/NV, 2002). Health and safety aspects of the project are documented in the current version of the Environmental Engineering Services Contractor's Health and Safety Plan and will be supplemented with a site-specific safety basis document. Corrective Action Unit 511 is comprised of the following nine corrective action sites in Nevada Test Site Areas 3, 4, 6, 7, 18, and 19: (1) 03-08-02, Waste Dump (Piles & Debris); (2) 03-99-11, Waste Dump (Piles); (3) 03-99-12, Waste Dump (Piles & Debris); (4) 04-99-04, Contaminated Trench/Berm; (5) 06-16-01, Waste Dump (Piles & Debris); (6) 06-17-02, Scattered Ordnance/Automatic Weapons Range; (7) 07-08-01, Contaminated Mound; (8) 18-99-10, Ammunition Dump; and (9) 19-19-03, Waste Dump (Piles & Debris). Corrective Action Sites 18-99-10 and 19-19-03 were identified after a review of the ''1992 RCRA Part B Permit Application for Waste Management Activities at the Nevada Test Site, Volume IV, Section L Potential Solid Waste Management Unit'' (DOE/NV, 1992). The remaining seven sites were first identified in the 1991 Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co., Inc. document entitled, ''Nevada Test Site Inventory of Inactive and Abandoned Facilities and Waste Sites''. The seven-step data quality objectives (DQO) process was used to identify and define the type, quantity, and quality of data needed to complete the investigation phase of the corrective action process. The DQOs address the primary problem that sufficient information is not available to determine the appropriate corrective action for the CASs. Corrective action closure alternatives (i.e., no further action, close in place, or clean closure) will be recommended for CAU 511 based on an evaluation of all the DQO required data. Under the ''Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order'', the Corrective Action Investigation Plan will be submitted to the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for approval. Field work will be conducted following approval of the plan. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of corrective action alternatives that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document.

David A. Strand

2004-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

85

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 573: Alpha Contaminated Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 573 is located in Area 5 of the Nevada National Security Site, which is approximately 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. CAU 573 is a grouping of sites where there has been a suspected release of contamination associated with non-nuclear experiments and nuclear testing. This document describes the planned investigation of CAU 573, which comprises the following corrective action sites (CASs): 05-23-02, GMX Alpha Contaminated Area 05-45-01, Atmospheric Test Site - Hamilton These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives.

Matthews, Patrick

2014-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

86

Remedial investigation concept plan for the groundwater operable units at the chemical plant area and the ordnance works area, Weldon Spring, Missouri  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S. Department of the Army (DA) are conducting cleanup activities at two properties--the DOE chemical plant area and the DA ordnance works area (the latter includes the training area)--located in the Weldon Spring area in St. Charles County, Missouri. These areas are on the National Priorities List (NPL), and cleanup activities at both areas are conducted in accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended. DOE and DA are conducting a joint remedial investigation (RI) and baseline risk assessment (BRA) as part of the remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) for the groundwater operable units for the two areas. This joint effort will optimize further data collection and interpretation efforts and facilitate overall remedial decision making since the aquifer of concern is common to both areas. A Work Plan issued jointly in 1995 by DOE and the DA discusses the results of investigations completed at the time of preparation of the report. The investigations were necessary to provide an understanding of the groundwater system beneath the chemical plant area and the ordnance works area. The Work Plan also identifies additional data requirements for verification of the evaluation presented.

NONE

1999-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

87

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 550: Smoky Contamination Area Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 550 is located in Areas 7, 8, and 10 of the Nevada National Security Site, which is approximately 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. CAU 550, Smoky Contamination Area, comprises 19 corrective action sites (CASs). Based on process knowledge of the releases associated with the nuclear tests and radiological survey information about the location and shape of the resulting contamination plumes, it was determined that some of the CAS releases are co-located and will be investigated as study groups. This document describes the planned investigation of the following CASs (by study group): (1) Study Group 1, Atmospheric Test - CAS 08-23-04, Atmospheric Test Site T-2C; (2) Study Group 2, Safety Experiments - CAS 08-23-03, Atmospheric Test Site T-8B - CAS 08-23-06, Atmospheric Test Site T-8A - CAS 08-23-07, Atmospheric Test Site T-8C; (3) Study Group 3, Washes - Potential stormwater migration of contaminants from CASs; (4) Study Group 4, Debris - CAS 08-01-01, Storage Tank - CAS 08-22-05, Drum - CAS 08-22-07, Drum - CAS 08-22-08, Drums (3) - CAS 08-22-09, Drum - CAS 08-24-03, Battery - CAS 08-24-04, Battery - CAS 08-24-07, Batteries (3) - CAS 08-24-08, Batteries (3) - CAS 08-26-01, Lead Bricks (200) - CAS 10-22-17, Buckets (3) - CAS 10-22-18, Gas Block/Drum - CAS 10-22-19, Drum; Stains - CAS 10-22-20, Drum - CAS 10-24-10, Battery. These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives (CAAs). Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation before evaluating CAAs and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each study group. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable CAAs that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document. The sites will be investigated based on the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on January 31, 2012, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAU 550. The potential contamination sources associated with the study groups are from nuclear testing activities conducted at CAU 550. The DQO process resulted in an assumption that the total effective dose (TED) within the default contamination boundary of CAU 550 exceeds the final action level and requires corrective action. The presence and nature of contamination outside the default contamination boundary at CAU 550 will be evaluated based on information collected from a field investigation. Radiological contamination will be evaluated based on a comparison of the TED at sample locations to the dose-based final action level. The TED will be calculated as the total of separate estimates of internal and external dose. Results from the analysis of soil samples will be used to calculate internal radiological dose. Thermoluminescent dosimeters placed at the center of each sample location will be used to measure external radiological dose. Appendix A provides a detailed discussion of the DQO methodology and the DQOs specific to each group of CASs.

Grant Evenson

2012-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

88

Draft Level 1 Remedial Investigation Work Plan: 316-3 waste disposal trenches  

SciTech Connect

This work plan describes the work to be performed for the initial level of site characterization for the 316.3 Trenches at the Hanford Site. This initial site characterization effort will include a review of existing environmental contamination data for the 300 Area as well as collection and analysis of environmental samples to better characterize subsurface contamination at the site. 7 refs., 10 figs., 7 tabs.

Not Available

1987-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

89

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 105: Area 2 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 105 is located in Area 2 of the Nevada National Security Site, which is approximately 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. CAU 105 is a geographical grouping of sites where there has been a suspected release of contamination associated with atmospheric nuclear testing. This document describes the planned investigation of CAU 105, which comprises the following corrective action sites (CASs): 02-23-04, Atmospheric Test Site - Whitney 02-23-05, Atmospheric Test Site T-2A 02-23-06, Atmospheric Test Site T-2B 02-23-08, Atmospheric Test Site T-2 02-23-09, Atmospheric Test Site - Turk These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives (CAAs). Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation before evaluating CAAs and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each CAS. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable CAAs that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document. The sites will be investigated based on the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on April 30, 2012, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAU 105. The site investigation process will also be conducted in accordance with the Soils Activity Quality Assurance Plan, which establishes requirements, technical planning, and general quality practices to be applied to this activity. The potential contamination sources associated with all CAU 105 CASs are from atmospheric nuclear testing activities. The presence and nature of contamination at CAU 105 will be evaluated based on information collected from a field investigation. Radiological contamination will be evaluated based on a comparison of the total effective dose at sample locations to the dose-based final action level. The total effective dose will be calculated as the total of separate estimates of internal and external dose. Results from the analysis of soil samples will be used to calculate internal radiological dose. Thermoluminescent dosimeters placed at the center of each sample location will be used to measure external radiological dose. Appendix A provides a detailed discussion of the DQO methodology and the DQOs specific to each CAS. This Corrective Action Investigation Plan has been developed in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order that was agreed to by the State of Nevada; DOE, Environmental Management; U.S. Department of Defense; and DOE, Legacy Management. Under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, this Corrective Action Investigation Plan will be submitted to the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for approval. Fieldwork will be conducted after the plan is approved.

Patrick Matthews

2012-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

90

Remedial investigation/feasibility study work plan for the 100-KR-4 operable unit, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect

Four areas of the Hanford Site (the 100, 200, 300, and 1100 Areas) have been included on the US Environmental Protection Agency`s (EPA`s) National Priorities List (NPL) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). This work plan and the attached supporting project plans establish the operable unit setting and the objectives, procedures, tasks, and schedule for conducting the CERCLA remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) for the 100-KR-4 operable unit. The 100-K Area consists of the 100-KR-4 groundwater operable unit and three source operable units. The 100-KR-4 operable unit includes all contamination found in the aquifer soils and water beneath the 100-K Area. Source operable units include facilities and unplanned release sites that are potential sources of contamination.

Not Available

1992-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

91

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Apatite Investigation at the 100-NR-2 Quality Assurance Project Plan  

SciTech Connect

This Quality Assurance Project Plan provides the quality assurance requirements and processes that will be followed by staff working on the 100-NR-2 Apatite Project. The U.S. Department of Energy, Fluor Hanford, Inc., Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, and the Washington Department of Ecology agreed that the long-term strategy for groundwater remediation at 100-N would include apatite sequestration as the primary treatment, followed by a secondary treatment. The scope of this project covers the technical support needed before, during, and after treatment of the targeted subsurface environment using a new high-concentration formulation.

Fix, N. J.

2008-03-28T23:59:59.000Z

92

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 541: Small Boy Nevada National Security Site and Nevada Test and Training Range, Nevada  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 541 is co-located on the boundary of Area 5 of the Nevada National Security Site and Range 65C of the Nevada Test and Training Range, approximately 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. CAU 541 is a grouping of sites where there has been a suspected release of contamination associated with nuclear testing. This document describes the planned investigation of CAU 541, which comprises the following corrective action sites (CASs): 05-23-04, Atmospheric Tests (6) - BFa Site 05-45-03, Atmospheric Test Site - Small Boy These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives (CAAs). Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation before evaluating CAAs and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each CAS. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable CAAs that will be presented in the investigation report. The sites will be investigated based on the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on April 1, 2014, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection; U.S. Air Force; and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAU 541. The site investigation process also will be conducted in accordance with the Soils Activity Quality Assurance Plan, which establishes requirements, technical planning, and general quality practices to be applied to this activity. The potential contamination sources associated with CASs 05-23-04 and 05-45-03 are from nuclear testing activities conducted at the Atmospheric Tests (6) - BFa Site and Atmospheric Test Site - Small Boy sites. The presence and nature of contamination at CAU 541 will be evaluated based on information collected from field investigations. Radiological contamination will be evaluated based on a comparison of the total effective dose at sample locations to the dose-based final action level. The total effective dose will be calculated as the total of separate estimates of internal and external dose. Results from the analysis of soil samples will be used to calculate internal radiological dose. Thermoluminescent dosimeters placed at the center of each sample location will be used to measure external radiological dose. Appendix A provides a detailed discussion of the DQO methodology and the DQOs specific to each CAS.

Matthews, Patrick

2014-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

93

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 567: Miscellaneous Soil Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, with ROTC 1 Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 567 is located in Areas 1, 3, 5, 20, and 25 of the Nevada National Security Site, which is approximately 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. CAU 567 is a grouping of sites where there has been a suspected release of contamination associated with nuclear testing. This document describes the planned investigation of CAU 567, which comprises the following corrective action sites (CASs): 01-23-03, Atmospheric Test Site T-1 03-23-25, Seaweed E Contamination Area 05-23-07, A5b RMA 20-23-08, Colby Mud Spill 25-23-23, J-11 Soil RMA These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives (CAAs). Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation before evaluating CAAs and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each CAS. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable CAAs that will be presented in the investigation report. The sites will be investigated based on the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on May 6, 2013, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAU 567. The site investigation process will also be conducted in accordance with the Soils Activity Quality Assurance Plan, which establishes requirements, technical planning, and general quality practices to be applied to this activity. The potential contamination sources associated with CAU 567 releases are nuclear test operations and other NNSS operations. The DQO process resulted in an assumption that total effective dose (TED) within a default contamination boundary at Atmospheric Test Site T-1 exceeds the final action level (FAL) and requires corrective action. The presence and nature of contamination outside the default contamination boundary at Atmospheric Test Site T-1 and all other CAU 567 CASs will be evaluated based on information collected from a field investigation. Radiological contamination will be evaluated based on a comparison of the TED at sample locations to the dose-based FAL. The TED will be calculated as the total of separate estimates of internal and external dose. Results from the analysis of soil samples will be used to calculate internal radiological dose. Thermoluminescent dosimeters placed at the center of each sample location will be used to measure external radiological dose. Appendix A provides a detailed discussion of the DQO methodology and the DQOs specific to each CAS.

Matthews, Patrick K.

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

94

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 166: Storage Yards and Contaminated Materials, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Rev. No.: 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit 166 is located in Areas 2, 3, 5, and 18 of the Nevada Test Site, which is 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 166 is comprised of the seven Corrective Action Sites (CASs) listed below: (1) 02-42-01, Cond. Release Storage Yd - North; (2) 02-42-02, Cond. Release Storage Yd - South; (3) 02-99-10, D-38 Storage Area; (4) 03-42-01, Conditional Release Storage Yard; (5) 05-19-02, Contaminated Soil and Drum; (6) 18-01-01, Aboveground Storage Tank; and (7) 18-99-03, Wax Piles/Oil Stain. These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives. Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation (CAI) before evaluating corrective action alternatives and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each CAS. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable corrective action alternatives that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document. The sites will be investigated based on the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on February 28, 2006, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection; U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office; Stoller-Navarro Joint Venture; and Bechtel Nevada. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAU 166. Appendix A provides a detailed discussion of the DQO methodology and the DQOs specific to each CAS. The scope of the CAI for CAU 166 includes the following activities: (1) Move surface debris and/or materials, as needed, to facilitate sampling. (2) Conduct radiological surveys. (3) Perform field screening. (4) Collect and submit environmental samples for laboratory analysis to determine if contaminants of concern are present. (5) If contaminants of concern are present, collect additional step-out samples to define the extent of the contamination. (6) Collect samples of investigation-derived waste, as needed, for waste management and minimization purposes. This Corrective Action Investigation Plan has been developed in accordance with the ''Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order'' that was agreed to by the State of Nevada, the U.S. Department of Energy, and the U.S. Department of Defense. Under the ''Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order'', this Corrective Action Investigation Plan will be submitted to the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection, and field work will commence following approval.

David Strand

2006-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

95

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 516: Septic Systems and Discharge Points, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Rev. 0, Including Record of Technical Change No. 1  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) contains the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Sites Office's (NNSA/NSO's) approach to collect the data necessary to evaluate corrective action alternatives appropriate for the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 516, Septic Systems and Discharge Points, Nevada Test Site (NTS), Nevada, under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. CAU 516 consists of six Corrective Action Sites: 03-59-01, Building 3C-36 Septic System; 03-59-02, Building 3C-45 Septic System; 06-51-01, Sump Piping, 06-51-02, Clay Pipe and Debris; 06-51-03, Clean Out Box and Piping; and 22-19-04, Vehicle Decontamination Area. Located in Areas 3, 6, and 22 of the NTS, CAU 516 is being investigated because disposed waste may be present without appropriate controls, and hazardous and/or radioactive constituents may be present or migrating at concentrations and locations that could potentially pose a threat to human health and the environment. Existing information and process knowledge on the expected nature and extent of contamination of CAU 516 are insufficient to select preferred corrective action alternatives; therefore, additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation. The results of this field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of corrective action alternatives in the corrective action decision document. Record of Technical Change No. 1 is dated 3/2004.

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Sites Office

2003-04-28T23:59:59.000Z

96

Plan for integrated testing for NNWSI [Nevada Nuclear Waste Storage Investigations] non EQ3/6 data base portion  

SciTech Connect

The purposes of the Integrated Testing Task are to develop laboratory data on thermodynamic properties for actinide and fission product elements for use in the EQ3/6 geochemical modelling code; to determine the transport properties of radionuclides in the near-field environment; and develop and validate a model to describe the rate of release of radionuclides from the near-field environment. Activities to achieve the firs item have been described in the Scientific Investigation Plan for EQ3/6, where quality assurance levels were assigned to the acitivities. This Scientific Investigation Plan describes activities to achieve the second and third purposes. The information gathered in these activities will be used to assess compliance with the performance objective for the Engineered Barrier System (EBS) to control the rate of release of radionuclides if the repository license application includes part of the host rock; to provide a source term for release of radionuclides from the waste package near-field environment to the system performance assessment task for use in showing compliance with the Environmental Protection Agency requirements; and to provide a source term for release of radionculides from the waste package near-field environment to the system performance assessment task for use in doing calculations of cumulative releases of radionuclides from the repository over 100,000 years as required by the site evaluation process. 5 refs.

Oversby, V.M.

1987-05-29T23:59:59.000Z

97

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 528: Polychlorinated Biphenyls Contamination, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Rev. 0  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan contains the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office's approach to collect the data necessary to evaluate corrective action alternatives appropriate for the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 528, Polychlorinated Biphenyls Contamination (PCBs), Nevada Test Site (NTS), Nevada, under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Located in the southwestern portion of Area 25 on the NTS in Jackass Flats (adjacent to Test Cell C [TCC]), CAU 528 consists of Corrective Action Site 25-27-03, Polychlorinated Biphenyls Surface Contamination. Test Cell C was built to support the Nuclear Rocket Development Station (operational between 1959 and 1973) activities including conducting ground tests and static firings of nuclear engine reactors. Although CAU 528 was not considered as a direct potential source of PCBs and petroleum contamination, two potential sources of contamination have nevertheless been identified from an unknown source in concentrations that could potentially pose an unacceptable risk to human health and/or the environment. This CAU's close proximity to TCC prompted Shaw to collect surface soil samples, which have indicated the presence of PCBs extending throughout the area to the north, east, south, and even to the edge of the western boundary. Based on this information, more extensive field investigation activities are being planned, the results of which are to be used to support a defensible evaluation of corrective action alternatives in the corrective action decision document.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office

2003-05-08T23:59:59.000Z

98

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 219: Septic Systems and Injection Wells, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Rev. No.: 0  

SciTech Connect

The Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 219, Septic Systems and Injection Wells, has been developed in accordance with the ''Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order'' (1996) that was agreed to by the State of Nevada, the U.S. Department of Energy, and the U.S. Department of Defense. The purpose of the investigation is to ensure that adequate data are collected to provide sufficient and reliable information to identify, evaluate, and select technically viable corrective actions. Corrective Action Unit 219 is located in Areas 3, 16, and 23 of the Nevada Test Site, which is 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. Corrective Action Unit 219 is comprised of the six Corrective Action Sites (CASs) listed below: (1) 03-11-01, Steam Pipes and Asbestos Tiles; (2) 16-04-01, Septic Tanks (3); (3) 16-04-02, Distribution Box; (4) 16-04-03, Sewer Pipes; (5) 23-20-01, DNA Motor Pool Sewage and Waste System; and (6) 23-20-02, Injection Well. These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives. Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation prior to evaluating corrective action alternatives and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each CAS. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable corrective action alternatives that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document.

David A. Strand

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

99

[Presenter's Name] [Presenter's Title]  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Byron Woertz Byron Woertz Senior Project Manager Transmission Planning in the West February 8, 2012 Tribal Leader Forum Series, Denver, CO 2 * What is WECC? * What is RTEP? * 2011 10-Year Regional Transmission Plan * 2013 10-Year Regional Transmission Plan * 2013 20-Year Regional Transmission Target Plan * Opportunities for Tribal Participation Today's Discussion 3 "My interest is in the future because I am going to spend the rest of my life there." ...Charles Kettering Why Transmission Planning? 4 What is WECC? 5 * Transmission Expansion Planning Policy Committee (TEPPC)-April, 2006 o Annual study program o Transmission expansion studies

100

Remedial investigation/feasibility study work plan for the 100-BC-2 operable unit, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect

This work plan and attached supporting project plans establish the operable unit setting and the objectives, procedures, tasks, and schedule for conducting the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) for the 100-BC-2 operable unit in the 100 Area of the Hanford Site. The 100 Area is one of four areas at the Hanford Site that are on the US Environmental Protection Agency`s (EPA) National Priorities List under CERCLA. The 100-BC-2 operable unit is one of two source operable units in the 100-B/C Area (Figure ES-1). Source operable units are those that contain facilities and unplanned release sites that are potential sources of hazardous substance contamination. The 100-BC-2 source operable unit contains waste sites that were formerly in the 100-BC-2, 100-BC-3, and 100-BC-4 operable units. Because of their size and geographic location, the waste sites from these two operable units were added to 100-BC-2. This allows for a more efficient and effective investigation of the remaining 100-B/C Reactor area waste sites. The investigative approach to waste sites associated with the 100-BC-2 operable unit are listed in Table ES-1. The waste sites fall into three general categories: high priority liquid waste disposal sites, low priority liquid waste disposal sites, and solid waste burial grounds. Several sites have been identified as candidates for conducting an IRM. Two sites have been identified as warranting additional limited field sampling. The two sites are the 116-C-2A pluto crib, and the 116-C-2C sand filter.

Not Available

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "investigation planning presentation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Development of an Urban Watershed Rehabilitation Method Using Stakeholder Feedback to Direct Investigation and Restoration Planning  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, Technology and Public Policy R-827147-01-0 PRINC IP AL INVESTIG ATORS Charles D. Samuelson, Ph.D. ? Psychology ? Texas A&M University Marty D. Matlock, Ph.D. ? Biological and Agricultural Engineering ? University of Arkansas CO -P RINC IP AL... and Public Policy RESEARCH FUNDED BY U.S. EPA - Science to Achieve Results (STAR) Program, Grant No. R-827147-01-0 ADDITIONAL SUPPORT PROVIDED BY The Institute for Science, Technology and Public Policy INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND PUBLIC POLICY...

Samuelson; Charles D.; Matlock, Marty D.; Kenimer, Ann L.; Neill, William H.; Peterson, Tarla Rai; Whitten, Guy D.; Vedlitz, Arnold; Alston, Letitia T.

2013-12-19T23:59:59.000Z

102

Remedial investigation/feasibility study Work Plan and addenda for Operable Unit 4-12: Central Facilities Area Landfills II and III at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

This document is divided into two main sections -- the Work Plan and the addenda. The Work Plan describes the regulatory history and physical setting of Operable Unit 4-12, previous sampling activities, and data. It also identifies a preliminary conceptual model, preliminary remedial action alternatives, and preliminary applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements. In addition, the Work Plan discusses data gaps and data quality objectives for proposed remedial investigation activities. Also included are tasks identified for the remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) and a schedule of RI/FS activities. The addenda include details of the proposed field activities (Field Sampling Plan), anticipated quality assurance activities (Quality Assurance Project Plan), policies and procedures to protect RI/FS workers and the environment during field investigations (Health and Safety Plan), and policies, procedures, and activities that the Department of Energy will use to involve the public in the decision-making process concerning CFA Landfills II and III RI/FS activities (Community Relations Plan).

Keck, K.N.; Stormberg, G.J.; Porro, I.; Sondrup, A.J.; McCormick, S.H.

1993-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

103

Environmental, safety, and health plan for the remedial investigation of Waste Area Grouping 10, Operable Unit 3, at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Environmental Restoration Program  

SciTech Connect

This document outlines the environmental, safety, and health (ES&H) approach to be followed for the remedial investigation of Waste Area Grouping (WAG) 10 at Oak at Ridge National Laboratory. This ES&H Plan addresses hazards associated with upcoming Operable Unit 3 field work activities and provides the program elements required to maintain minimal personnel exposures and to reduce the potential for environmental impacts during field operations. The hazards evaluation for WAG 10 is presented in Sect. 3. This section includes the potential radiological, chemical, and physical hazards that may be encountered. Previous sampling results suggest that the primary contaminants of concern will be radiological (cobalt-60, europium-154, americium-241, strontium-90, plutonium-238, plutonium-239, cesium-134, cesium-137, and curium-244). External and internal exposures to radioactive materials will be minimized through engineering controls (e.g., ventilation, containment, isolation) and administrative controls (e.g., procedures, training, postings, protective clothing).

Not Available

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

104

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 135: Area 25 Underground Storage Tanks Nevada Test Site, Nevada  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) has been developed in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) that was agreed to by the US Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office (DOE/NV); the State of Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP); and the US Department of Defense (FFACO, 1996). The CAIP is a document that provides or references all of the specific information for investigation activities associated with Corrective Action Units (CAUs) or Corrective Action Sites (CASs). According to the FFACO, CASs are sites potentially requiring corrective action(s) and may include solid waste management units or individual disposal or release sites (FFACO, 1996). Corrective Action Units consist of one or more CASs grouped together based on geography, technical similarity, or agency responsibility for the purpose of determining corrective actions. This CAIP contains the environmental sample collection objectives and the criteria for conducting site investigation activities at CAU 135, Area 25 Underground Storage Tanks (USTs), which is located on the Nevada Test Site (NTS). The NTS is approximately 105 kilometers (km) (65 miles [mi]) northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada.

U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office

1999-05-05T23:59:59.000Z

105

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 240: Area 25 Vehicle Washdown Nevada Test Site, Nevada  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) has been developed in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) that was agreed to by the US Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office (DOE/NV); the State of Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP); and the US Department of Defense (FFACO, 1996). The CAIP is a document that provides or references all of the specific information for investigation activities associated with Corrective Action Units (CAUs) or Corrective Action Sites (CASs). According to the FFACO, CASs are sites potentially requiring corrective action(s) and may include solid waste management units or individual disposal or release sites (FFACO, 1996). Corrective Action Units consist of one or more CASs grouped together based on geography, technical similarity, or agency responsibility for the purpose of determining corrective actions. This CAIP contains the environmental sample collection objectives and the criteria for conducting site investigation activities at CAU 240, Area 25 Vehicle Washdown, which is located on the Nevada Test Site (NTS).

DOE/NV

1999-01-25T23:59:59.000Z

106

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 570: Area 9 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

CAU 570 comprises the following six corrective action sites (CASs): 02-23-07, Atmospheric Test Site - Tesla 09-23-10, Atmospheric Test Site T-9 09-23-11, Atmospheric Test Site S-9G 09-23-14, Atmospheric Test Site - Rushmore 09-23-15, Eagle Contamination Area 09-99-01, Atmospheric Test Site B-9A These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives (CAAs). Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation before evaluating CAAs and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each CAS. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable CAAs that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document. The sites will be investigated based on the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on April 30, 2012, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAU 570. The site investigation process will also be conducted in accordance with the Soils Activity Quality Assurance Plan, which establishes requirements, technical planning, and general quality practices to be applied to this activity. The presence and nature of contamination at CAU 570 will be evaluated based on information collected from a field investigation. Radiological contamination will be evaluated based on a comparison of the total effective dose at sample locations to the dose-based final action level. The total effective dose will be calculated as the total of separate estimates of internal and external dose. Results from the analysis of soil samples will be used to calculate internal radiological dose. Thermoluminescent dosimeters placed near the center of each sample location will be used to measure external radiological dose. Appendix A provides a detailed discussion of the DQO methodology and the DQOs specific to each CAS.

Patrick Matthews

2012-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

107

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 487: Thunderwell Site, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada (Rev. No.: 0, January 2001)  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan contains the U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office's (DOE/NV's) approach to collect the data necessary to evaluate corrective action alternatives (CAAs) appropriate for the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 487, Thunderwell Site, Tonopah Test Range (TTR), Nevada, under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Corrective Action Unit 487 consists of a single Corrective Action Site (CAS), RG 26-001-RGRV, Thunderwell Site. The site is located in the northwest portion of the TTR, Nevada, approximately five miles northwest of the Area 3 Control Point and closest to the Cactus Flats broad basin. Historically, Sandia National Laboratories in New Mexico used CAU 487 in the early to mid-1960s for a series of high explosive tests detonated at the bottom of large cylindrical steel tubes. Historical photographs indicate that debris from these tests and subsequent operations may have been scattered and buried throughout the site. A March 2000 walk-over survey and a July 2000 geophysical survey indicated evidence of buried and surface debris in dirt mounds and areas throughout the site; however, a radiological drive-over survey also performed in July 2000 indicated that no radiological hazards were identified at this site. Based on site history, the scope of this plan is to resolve the problem statement identified during the Data Quality Objectives process that detonation activities at this CAU site may have resulted in the release of contaminants of concern into the surface/subsurface soil including total volatile and total semivolatile organic compounds, total Resource Conservation and Recovery Act metals, radionuclides, total petroleum hydrocarbons, and high explosives. Therefore, the scope of corrective action field investigation will involve excavation, drilling, and extensive soil sampling and analysis activities to determine the extent (if any) of both the lateral and vertical contamination and whether or not any such contamination extends beyond the historical boundaries of the site. The results of this field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of CAAs in the subsequent corrective action decision document.

DOE/NV

2001-01-02T23:59:59.000Z

108

NASA presents space exploration plans  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... this craft: Lockheed Martin Corporation lead one group, and the Northrop Grumman Corporation and Boeing head the other. Both teams will now tweak their early CEV designs to fit ...

Mark Peplow

2005-09-19T23:59:59.000Z

109

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 266: Area 25 Building 3124 Leachfield, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 1, February 1999  

SciTech Connect

The Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 266, Area 25 Building 3124 Leachfield, has been developed in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order that was agreed to by the U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office; the State of Nevada Division of Environmental Protection; and the U.S. Department of Defense. Corrective Action Unit 266 consists of the Corrective Action Site 25-05-09 sanitary leachfield and associated collection system. This Corrective Action Investigation Plan is used in combination with the Work Plan for Leachfield Corrective Action Units: Nevada Test Site and Tonopah Test Range, Nevada (DOE/NV, 1998d). This Corrective Action Investigation Plan provides investigative details specific to Corrective Action Unit 266. Corrective Action Unit 266 is located southwest of Building 3124 which is located southwest and adjacent to Test Cell A. Test Cell A was operational during the 1960s to test nuclear rocket reactors in support of the Nuclear Rocket Development Station. Operations within Building 3124 from 1962 through the early 1990s resulted in effluent releases to the leachfield and associated collection system. The subsurface soils in the vicinity of the collection system and leachfield may have been impacted by effluent containing contaminants of potential concern generated by support activities associated with Test Cell A reactor testing operations, various laboratories including a high-level radioactivity environmental sample handling laboratory, and possibly the Treatability Test Facility. Based on site history collected to support the Data Quality Objectives process, contaminants of potential concern for the site include radionuclides, oil/diesel range total petroleum hydrocarbons, and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act characteristic volatile organic compounds, semivolatile organic compounds, and metals. Samples will also be analyzed for radionuclides and polychlorinated biphenyls not considered during the DQO process. Additional samples will be analyzed for geotechnical and hydrological properties and a bioassessment may be performed. The technical approach for investigating this Corrective Action Unit consists of the following activities: (1) Perform a radiological walkover survey. (2) Perform video and radiation surveys of the discharge and outfall lines. (3) Collect samples from within the septic tank. (4) Mark approximate locations of leachfield distribution lines on the ground surface. (5) Collect subsurface soil samples in areas of the collection system including the septic tank and outfall end of the diversion chamber. (6) Collect subsurface soil samples underlying the leachfield distribution pipes. (7) Field screen samples for volatile organic compounds and radiological activity. (8) Drill boreholes and collect subsurface soil samples if required. (9) Analyze soil samples for total volatile organic compounds, total semivolatile organic compounds, total Resource Conservation and Recovery Act metals, total petroleum hydrocarbons (oil/diesel-range organics), and polychlorinated biphenyls. (1) Analyze a minimum of 25 percent of the soil samples for gamma-emitting radionuclides, isotopic uranium, isotopic plutonium, isotopic americium, and strontium-90 if radiological field screening levels are exceeded. (2) Collect samples from native soils beneath the distribution system and analyze for geotechnical/hydrologic parameters. (3) Collect and analyze bioassessment samples at Site Supervisors discretion if volatile organic compounds exceed field-screening levels. Additional sampling and analytical details are presented.

U.S. Department Of Energy, Nevada Operations Office

1999-02-24T23:59:59.000Z

110

Site characterization plan: Conceptual design report, Volume 2: Chapters 4-9: Nevada Nuclear Waste Storage Investigations Project  

SciTech Connect

This document presents a description of a prospective geologic repository for high-level radioactive waste to support the development of the Site Characterization Plan for the Yucca Mountain site. The target horizon for waste emplacement is a sloping bed of densely welded tuff more than 650 ft below the surface and typically more than 600 ft above the water table. The conceptual design described in this report is unique among repository designs in that it uses ramps in addition to shafts to gain access to the underground facility, the emplacement horizon is located above the water table, and it is possible that 300- to 400-ft-long horizontal waste emplacement boreholes will be used. This report summarizes the design bases (site and properties of the waste package), design and performance criteria, and the design analyses performed. The current status of meeting the preclosure performance objectives for licensing and of resolving the repository design and preclosure issues is presented. The repository design presented in this report will be expanded and refined during the advanced conceptual design, the license application design, and the final procurement and construction design phases. 147 refs., 145 figs., 83 tabs.

MacDougall, H.R.; Scully, L.W.; Tillerson, J.R. (comps.)

1987-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

111

Corrective action investigation plan for Corrective Action Unit 342: Area 23 Mercury Fire Training Pit, Nevada Test Site, Nevada  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) has been developed in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) that was agreed to by the US Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office (DOE/NV); the State of Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP); and the US Department of Defense (FFACO, 1996). The CAIP is a document that provides or references all of the specific information for investigation activities associated with Corrective Action Units (CAUs) or Corrective Action Sites (CASs). According to the FFACO, CASs are sites potentially requiring corrective action(s) and may include solid waste management units or individual disposal or release sites (FFACO, 1996). Corrective Action Units consist of one or more CASs grouped together based on geography, technical similarity, or agency responsibility for the purpose of determining corrective actions. This CAIP contains the environmental sample collection objectives and the criteria for conducting site investigation activities at CAU 342, the Area 23 Mercury Fire Training Pit (FTP), which is located in Area 23 at the Nevada Test Site (NTS). The NTS is approximately 88 km (55 mi) northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. Corrective Action Unit 342 is comprised of CAS 23-56-01. The FTP is an area approximately 100 m by 140 m (350 ft by 450 ft) located west of the town of Mercury, Nevada, which was used between approximately 1965 and 1990 to train fire-fighting personnel (REECo, 1991; Jacobson, 1991). The surface and subsurface soils in the FTP have likely been impacted by hydrocarbons and other contaminants of potential concern (COPC) associated with burn activities and training exercises in the area.

NONE

1998-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

112

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 557: Spills and Tank Sites, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 557 is located in Areas 1, 3, 6, and 25 of the Nevada Test Site, which is approximately 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada, and is comprised of the four corrective action sites (CASs) listed below: 01-25-02, Fuel Spill 03-02-02, Area 3 Subdock UST 06-99-10, Tar Spills 25-25-18, Train Maintenance Bldg 3901 Spill Site These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives. Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation before evaluating corrective action alternatives and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each CAS. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable corrective action alternatives that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document. The sites will be investigated based on the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on April 3, 2008, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP); U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office; Stoller-Navarro Joint Venture; and National Security Technologies, LLC. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAU 557. Appendix A provides a detailed discussion of the DQO methodology and the DQOs specific to each CAS. The scope of the corrective action investigation for CAU 557 includes the following activities: Move surface debris and/or materials, as needed, to facilitate sampling. Conduct radiological survey at CAS 25-25-18. Perform field screening. Collect and submit environmental samples for laboratory analysis to determine whether contaminants of concern are present. If contaminants of concern are present, collect additional step-out samples to define the extent of the contamination. Collect samples of investigation-derived waste, as needed, for waste management purposes.

Alfred Wickline

2008-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

113

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 563: Septic Systems, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, with Errata Sheet, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit 563, Septic Systems, is located in Areas 3 and 12 of the Nevada Test Site, which is 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. Corrective Action Unit 563 is comprised of the four corrective action sites (CASs) below: 03-04-02, Area 3 Subdock Septic Tank 03-59-05, Area 3 Subdock Cesspool 12-59-01, Drilling/Welding Shop Septic Tanks 12-60-01, Drilling/Welding Shop Outfalls These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives. Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation (CAI) before evaluating corrective action alternatives and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each CAS. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable corrective action alternatives that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document.

Alfred Wickline

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

114

Site characterization plan: Conceptual design report, Volume 3: Appendices A-E: Nevada Nuclear Waste Storage Investigations Project  

SciTech Connect

This document presents a description of a prospective geologic repository for high-level radioactive waste to support the development of the Site Characterization Plan for the Yucca Mountain site. The site for the prospective repository is located at Yucca Mountain in southwestern Nevada, and the waste emplacement area will be constructed in the underlying volcanic tuffs. The target horizon for waste emplacement is a sloping bed of densely welded tuff more than 650 ft below the surface and typically more than 600 ft above the water table. The conceptual design described in this report is unique among repository designs in that it uses ramps in addition to shafts to gain access to the underground facility, the emplacement horizon is located above the water table, and it is possible that 300- to 400-ft-long horizontal waste emplacement boreholes will be used. This report summarizes the design bases, design and performance criteria, and the design analyses performed. The current status of meeting the preclosure performance objectives for licensing and of resolving the repository design and preclosure issues is presented. Volume 3 contains Appendices A through E.

MacDougall, H.R.; Scully, L.W.; Tillerson, J.R. (comps.)

1987-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

115

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 486: Double Tracks RADSAFE Area Nellis Air Force Range, Nevada  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) has been developed in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) that was agreed to by the US Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office (DOE/NV); the State of Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP); and the US Department of Defense (FFACO, 1996). The CAIP is a document that provides or references all of the specific information for investigation activities associated with Corrective Action Units (CAUs) or Corrective Action Sites (CASs). According to the FFACO, CASs are sites potentially requiring corrective action(s) and may include solid waste management units or individual disposal or release sites (FFACO, 1996). Corrective Action Units consist of one or more CASs grouped together based on geography, technical similarity, or agency responsibility for the purpose of determining corrective actions. This CAIP contains the environmental sample collection objectives and the criteria for conducting site investigation activities at CAU 486, the Double Tracks Radiological Safety (RADSAFE) Area (DTRSA) which is located on the Nellis Air Force Range 71North (N), west of the Tonopah Test Range (TTR). The TTR, included in the Nellis Air Force Range Complex, is approximately 255 kilometers (km) (140 miles [mi]) northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada (Figure 1-1). Corrective Action Unit 486 is comprised of CAS 71-23-001-71DT consisting of two areas of concern referred to as the vehicle decontamination area and the animal burial pit. The DTRSA is located on the west side of the Cactus Range approximately 8 km (5 mi) southwest of the Cactus Spring gate at the intersection of the Cactus Spring Road and the Double Tracks Control Point Road (Figure 1-2). The DTRSA was used during May 1963 to decontaminate vehicles, equipment, personnel, and animals from the Double Tracks test. The DTRSA is one of three areas identified as a potential location for the disposal of radioactively contaminated materials from the Double Tracks experiment. The other two locations are the Cactus Spring Waste Trenches (CAU 426) and the Roller Coaster RADSAFE Area (CAU 407), both of which have been investigated. The surface and subsurface soils are likely to have been impacted by plutonium and other contaminants of potential concern (COPCs) associated with decontamination activities at this site.

IT Las Vegas

1998-10-15T23:59:59.000Z

116

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 190: Contaminated Waste Sites Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Rev. No.: 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 190 is located in Areas 11 and 14 of the Nevada Test Site, which is 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. Corrective Action Unit 190 is comprised of the four Corrective Action Sites (CASs) listed below: (1) 11-02-01, Underground Centrifuge; (2) 11-02-02, Drain Lines and Outfall; (3) 11-59-01, Tweezer Facility Septic System; and (4) 14-23-01, LTU-6 Test Area. These sites are being investigated because existing information is insufficient on the nature and extent of potential contamination to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives. Additional information will be obtained before evaluating corrective action alternatives and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each CAS by conducting a corrective action investigation (CAI). The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable corrective action alternatives that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document. The sites will be investigated based on the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on August 24, 2006, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection; U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office; Stoller-Navarro Joint Venture, and National Security Technologies, LLC. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAU 190. The scope of the CAU 190 CAI includes the following activities: (1) Move surface debris and/or materials, as needed, to facilitate sampling; (2) Conduct radiological and geophysical surveys; (3) Perform field screening; (4) Collect and submit environmental samples for laboratory analysis to determine whether contaminants of concern (COCs) are present; (5) If COCs are present, collect additional step-out samples to define the lateral and vertical extent of the contamination; (6) Collect samples of source material, if present, to determine the potential for a release; (7) Collect samples of investigation-derived waste, as needed, for waste management and minimization purposes; and (8) Collect quality control samples. This Corrective Action Investigation Document (CAIP) has been developed in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) agreed to by the State of Nevada, U.S. Department of Energy, and U.S. Department of Defense. Under the FFACO, this CAIP will be submitted to the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for approval. Field work will be conducted following approval.

Wickline, Alfred

2006-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

117

Renewable Electricity Futures (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect

This presentation library summarizes findings of NREL's Renewable Electricity Futures study, published in June 2012. RE Futures investigated the challenges and impacts of achieving very high renewable electricity generation levels in the contiguous United States by 2050. It was presented at Wind Powering America States Summit. The Summit, which follows the American Wind Energy Association's (AWEA's) annual WINDPOWER Conference and Exhibition, provides state Wind Working Groups, state energy officials, U.S. Energy Department and national laboratory representatives, and professional and institutional partners an opportunity to review successes, opportunities, and challenges for wind energy and plan future collaboration.

DeMeo, E.

2012-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

118

Phase 1 RCRA Facility Investigation & Corrective Measures Study Work Plan for Single Shell Tank (SST) Waste Management Areas  

SciTech Connect

This document is the master work plan for the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) Corrective Action Program (RCAP) for single-shell tank (SST) farms at the US. Department of Energy's (DOE'S) Hanford Site. The DOE Office of River Protection (ORP) initiated the RCAP to address the impacts of past and potential future tank waste releases to the environment. This work plan defines RCAP activities for the four SST waste management areas (WMAs) at which releases have contaminated groundwater. Recognizing the potential need for future RCAP activities beyond those specified in this master work plan, DOE has designated the currently planned activities as ''Phase 1.'' If a second phase of activities is needed for the WMAs addressed in Phase 1, or if releases are detected at other SST WMAs, this master work plan will be updated accordingly.

MCCARTHY, M.M.

1999-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

119

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 309: Area 12 Muckpiles, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Rev. No. 0  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 309, Area 12 Muckpiles, Nevada Test Site (NTS), Nevada, has been developed in accordance with the ''Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order'' (FFACO) that was agreed to by the State of Nevada, the U.S. Department of Energy, and the U.S. Department of Defense. The general purpose of the investigation is to ensure that adequate data are collected to provide sufficient and reliable information to identify, evaluate, and select technically viable corrective actions. Corrective Action Unit 309 is comprised of the following three corrective action sites (CASs) in Area 12 of the NTS: (1) CAS 12-06-09, Muckpile; (2) CAS 12-08-02, Contaminated Waste Dump (CWD); and (3) CAS 12-28-01, I-, J-, and K-Tunnel Debris. Corrective Action Site 12-06-09 consists of a muckpile and debris located on the hillside in front of the I-, J-, and K-Tunnels on the eastern slopes of Rainier Mesa in Area 12. The muckpile includes mining debris (muck) and debris generated during the excavation and construction of the I-, J-, and K-Tunnels. Corrective Action Site 12-08-02, CWD, consists of a muckpile and debris and is located on the hillside in front of the re-entry tunnel for K-Tunnel. For the purpose of this investigation CAS 12-28-01 is defined as debris ejected by containment failures during the Des Moines and Platte Tests and the associated contamination that is not covered in the two muckpile CASs. This site consists of debris scattered south of the I-, J-, and K-Tunnel muckpiles and extends down the hillside, across the valley, and onto the adjacent hillside to the south. In addition, the site will cover the potential contamination associated with ''ventings'' along the fault, fractures, and various boreholes on the mesa top and face. One conceptual site model was developed for all three CASs to address possible contamination migration pathways associated with CAU 309. The data quality objective (DQO) process was used to identify and define the type, quantity, and quality of data needed to complete the investigation phase of the corrective action process. The DQO process addresses the primary problem that sufficient information is not available to determine the appropriate corrective action for the CAU. Due to the practical constraints posed by steep slopes on and around the CAU 309 muckpiles, a conservative, simplifying strategy was developed to resolve the presence and nature of contaminants. This strategy includes the use of historical data from similar sites (i.e., previously investigated NTS muckpiles) and the collection of samples from accessible areas of the muckpiles. Based on site history, process knowledge, and previous investigations of similar sites, contaminants of potential concern for CAU 309 collectively include radionuclides, total petroleum hydrocarbons (diesel range only), polychlorinated biphenyls, ''Resource Conservation and Recovery Act'' metals, volatile organic compounds, and semivolatile organic compounds.

Robert F. Boehlecke

2004-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

120

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 365: Baneberry Contamination Area, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit 365 comprises one corrective action site (CAS), CAS 08-23-02, U-8d Contamination Area. This site is being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives (CAAs). Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation before evaluating CAAs and selecting the appropriate corrective action for the CAS. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable CAAs that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document. The site will be investigated based on the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on July 6, 2010, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for the Baneberry site. The primary release associated with Corrective Action Unit 365 was radiological contamination from the Baneberry nuclear test. Baneberry was an underground weapons-related test that vented significant quantities of radioactive gases from a fissure located in close proximity to ground zero. A crater formed shortly after detonation, which stemmed part of the flow from the fissure. The scope of this investigation includes surface and shallow subsurface (less than 15 feet below ground surface) soils. Radionuclides from the Baneberry test with the potential to impact groundwater are included within the Underground Test Area Subproject. Investigations and corrective actions associated with the Underground Test Area Subproject include the radiological inventory resulting from the Baneberry test.

Patrick Matthews

2010-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "investigation planning presentation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Corrective Action Investigation plan for Corrective Action Unit 546: Injection Well and Surface Releases, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 546 is located in Areas 6 and 9 of the Nevada Test Site, which is approximately 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. Corrective Action Unit 546 is comprised of two Corrective Action Sites (CASs) listed below: 06-23-02, U-6a/Russet Testing Area 09-20-01, Injection Well These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives. Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation (CAI) before evaluating corrective action alternatives and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each CAS. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable corrective action alternatives that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document. The sites will be investigated based on the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on November 8, 2007, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection and U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office. The DQO process has been used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAU 546.

Alfred Wickline

2008-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

122

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 374: Area 20 Schooner Unit Crater Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit 374 is located in Areas 18 and 20 of the Nevada Test Site, which is approximately 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. Corrective Action Unit 374 comprises the five corrective action sites (CASs) listed below: 18-22-05, Drum 18-22-06, Drums (20) 18-22-08, Drum 18-23-01, Danny Boy Contamination Area 20-45-03, U-20u Crater (Schooner) These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives (CAAs). Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation before evaluating CAAs and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each CAS. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable CAAs that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document. The sites will be investigated based on the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on October 20, 2009, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAU 374.

Patrick Matthews

2010-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

123

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 560: Septic Systems, Nevada Test Site, Nevada with ROTC1, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 560 is located in Areas 3 and 6 of the Nevada Test Site, which is approximately 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. Corrective Action Unit 560 is comprised of the seven corrective action sites (CASs) listed below: 03-51-01, Leach Pit 06-04-02, Septic Tank 06-05-03, Leach Pit 06-05-04, Leach Bed 06-59-03, Building CP-400 Septic System 06-59-04, Office Trailer Complex Sewage Pond 06-59-05, Control Point Septic System These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives. Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation before evaluating corrective action alternatives and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each CAS. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable corrective action alternatives that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document. The sites will be investigated based on the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on January 22, 2008, by representatives from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection; U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office; Stoller-Navarro Joint Venture; and National Security Technologies, LLC. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAU 560.

Grant Evenson

2008-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

124

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 252: Area 25 Engine Test Stand 1 Decontamination Pad, Nevada Test Site, Nevada  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan contains the U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office's approach to collect the data necessary to evaluate corrective action alternatives appropriate for the closure of Corrective Action Unit 252 under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Corrective Action Unit 252 consists of Corrective Action Site (CAS) 25-07-02, Engine Test Stand-1 (ETS-1) Decontamination Pad. Located in Area 25 at the intersection of Road H and Road K at the Nevada Test Site, ETS-1 was designed for use as a mobile radiation checkpoint and for vehicle decontamination. The CAS consists of a concrete decontamination pad with a drain, a gravel-filled sump, two concrete trailer pads, and utility boxes. Constructed in 1966, the ETS-1 facility was part of the Nuclear Rocket Development Station (NRDS) complex and used to test nuclear rockets. The ETS-1 Decontamination Pad and mobile radiation check point was built in 1968. The NRDS complex ceased primary operations in 1973. Based on site history, the focus of the field investigation activities will be to determine if any primary contaminants of potential concern (COPCs) (including radionuclides, total volatile organic compounds, total semivolatile organic compounds, total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel-range organics, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act metals, total pesticides, and polychlorinated biphenyls) are present at this site. Vertical extent of migration of suspected vehicle decontamination effluent COPCs is expected to be less than 12 feet below ground surface. Lateral extent of migration of COPCs is expected to be limited to the sump area or near the northeast corner of the decontamination pad. Using a biased sampling approach, near-surface and subsurface sampling will be conducted at the suspected worst-case areas including the sump and soil near the northeast corner of the decontamination pad. The results of this field investigation will support a defensible e valuation of corrective action alternatives in the corrective action decision document.

U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office

1999-08-20T23:59:59.000Z

125

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 139: Waste Disposal Sites, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Rev. No.: 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 139 is located in Areas 3, 4, 6, and 9 of the Nevada Test Site, which is 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. Corrective Action Unit 139 is comprised of the seven corrective action sites (CASs) listed below: (1) 03-35-01, Burn Pit; (2) 04-08-02, Waste Disposal Site; (3) 04-99-01, Contaminated Surface Debris; (4) 06-19-02, Waste Disposal Site/Burn Pit; (5) 06-19-03, Waste Disposal Trenches; (6) 09-23-01, Area 9 Gravel Gertie; and (7) 09-34-01, Underground Detection Station. These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives with the exception of CASs 09-23-01 and 09-34-01. Regarding these two CASs, CAS 09-23-01 is a gravel gertie where a zero-yield test was conducted with all contamination confined to below ground within the area of the structure, and CAS 09-34-01 is an underground detection station where no contaminants are present. Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation (CAI) before evaluating corrective action alternatives and selecting the appropriate corrective action for the other five CASs where information is insufficient. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable corrective action alternatives that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document. The sites will be investigated based on the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on January 4, 2006, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection; U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office; Stoller-Navarro Joint Venture; and Bechtel Nevada. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAU 139.

Grant Evenson

2006-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

126

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 99: Rainier Mesa/Shoshone Mountain, Nevada Test Site, Nevada with Errata and ROTC 1, Rev. No. 0  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) was developed for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 99, Rainier Mesa/Shoshone Mountain. The CAIP is a requirement of the ''Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order'' (FFACO) agreed to by the State of Nevada, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), and the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) (FFACO, 1996). The FFACO addresses environmental restoration activities at U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) facilities and sites including the underground testing area(s) of the Nevada Test Site (NTS). This CAIP describes the investigation activities currently planned for the Rainier Mesa/Shoshone Mountain CAU. These activities are consistent with the current Underground Test Area (UGTA) Project strategy described in Section 3.0 of Appendix VI, Revision No. 1 (December 7, 2000) of the FFACO (1996) and summarized in Section 2.1.2 of this plan. The Rainier Mesa/Shoshone Mountain CAU extends over several areas of the NTS (Figure 1-1) and includes former underground nuclear testing locations in Areas 12 and 16. The area referred to as ''Rainier Mesa'' includes the geographical area of Rainier Mesa proper and the contiguous Aqueduct Mesa. Figure 1-2 shows the locations of the tests (within tunnel complexes) conducted at Rainier Mesa. Shoshone Mountain is located approximately 20 kilometers (km) south of Rainier Mesa, but is included within the same CAU due to similarities in their geologic setting and in the nature and types of nuclear tests conducted. Figure 1-3 shows the locations of the tests conducted at Shoshone Mountain. The Rainier Mesa/Shoshone Mountain CAU falls within the larger-scale Rainier Mesa/Shoshone Mountain Investigation Area, which also includes the northwest section of the Yucca Flat CAU as shown in Figure 1-1. Rainier Mesa and Shoshone Mountain lie adjacent to the Timber Mountain Caldera Complex and are composed of volcanic rocks that erupted from the caldera as well as from more distant sources. This has resulted in a layered volcanic stratigraphy composed of thick deposits of welded and nonwelded ash-flow tuff and lava flows. These deposits are proximal to the source caldera and are interstratified with the more distal facies of fallout tephra and bedded reworked tuff from more distant sources. In each area, a similar volcanic sequence was deposited upon Paleozoic carbonate and siliciclastic rocks that are disrupted by various thrust faults, normal faults, and strike-slip faults. In both Rainier Mesa (km) to the southwest, and Tippipah Spring, 4 km to the north, and the tunnel complex is dry. Particle-tracking simulations performed during the value of information analysis (VOIA) (SNJV, 2004b) indicate that most of the regional groundwater that underlies the test locations at Rainier Mesa and Shoshone Mountain eventually follows similar and parallel paths and ultimately discharges in Death Valley and the Amargosa Desert. Particle-tracking simulations conducted for the regional groundwater flow and risk assessment indicated that contamination from Rainier Mesa and Shoshone Mountain were unlikely to leave the NTS during the 1,000-year period of interest (DOE/NV, 1997a). It is anticipated that CAU-scale modeling will modify these results somewhat, but it is not expected to radically alter the outcome of these previous particle-tracking simulations within the 1,000-year period of interest. The Rainier Mesa/Shoshone Mountain CAIP describes the corrective action investigation (CAI) to be conducted at the Rainier Mesa/Shoshone Mountain CAU to evaluate the extent of contamination in groundwater due to the underground nuclear testing. The CAI will be conducted by the UGTA Project, which is part of the NNSA/NSO Environmental Restoration Project (ERP). The purpose and scope of the CAI are presented in this section, followed by a summary of the entire document.

John McCord; Marutzky, Sam

2004-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

127

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 409: Other Waste Sites, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada (Rev. 0)  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan contains the U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office's approach to collect the data necessary to evaluate corrective action alternatives appropriate for the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 409 under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Corrective Action Unit 409 consists of three Corrective Action Sites (CASs): TA-53-001-TAB2, Septic Sludge Disposal Pit No.1; TA-53-002-TAB2, Septic Sludge Disposal Pit No.2; and RG-24-001-RGCR, Battery Dump Site. The Septic Sludge Disposal Pits are located near Bunker Two, close to Area 3, on the Tonopah Test Range. The Battery Dump Site is located at the abandoned Cactus Repeater Station on Cactus Peak. The Cactus Repeater Station was a remote, battery-powered, signal repeater station. The two Septic Sludge Disposal Pits were suspected to be used through the late 1980s as disposal sites for sludge from septic tanks located in Area 3. Based on site history collected to support the Data Quality Objectives process, contaminants of potential concern are the same for the disposal pits and include: volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semivolatile organic compounds, total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) as gasoline- and diesel-range organics, polychlorinated biphenyls, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act metals, and radionuclides (including plutonium and depleted uranium). The Battery Dump Site consists of discarded lead-acid batteries and associated construction debris, placing the site in a Housekeeping Category and, consequently, no contaminants are expected to be encountered during the cleanup process. The corrective action the at this CAU will include collection of discarded batteries and construction debris at the Battery Dump Site for proper disposal and recycling, along with photographic documentation as the process progresses. The corrective action for the remaining CASs involves the collection of background radiological data through borings drilled at undisturbed locations near the area of the disposal pits; field screening samples for radiological constituents; analysis for geotechnical/hydrologic parameters of samples beneath the disposal pits; and bioassessment samples, if VOC or TPH contamination concentrations exceed field-screening levels. The results of this field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of corrective action alternatives in the corrective action decision document.

DOE/NV

2000-10-05T23:59:59.000Z

128

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 98: Frenchman Flat, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (Revision 1)  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) has been developed for Frenchman Flat Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 98. The Frenchman Flat CAU is located along the eastern border of the Nevada Test Site (NTS) and includes portions of Areas 5 and 11. The Frenchman Flat CAU constitutes one of several areas of the Nevada Test Site used for underground nuclear testing in the past. The nuclear tests resulted in groundwater contamination in the vicinity as well as downgradient of the underground test areas. The CAIP describes the Corrective Action Investigation (CAI) to be conducted at the Frenchman Flat CAU to evaluate the extent of contamination in groundwater due to the underground nuclear testing. The Frenchman Flat CAI will be conducted by the Underground Test Area (UGTA) Project which is a part of the U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office (DOE/NV) Environmental Restoration Project. The CAIP is a requirement of the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) (1996 ) agreed to by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP), and the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD). Based on the general definition of a CAI from Section IV.14 of the FFACO, the purpose of the CAI is ''...to gather data sufficient to characterize the nature, extent, and rate of migration or potential rate of migration from releases or discharges of pollutants or contaminants and/or potential releases or discharges from corrective action units identified at the facilities...'' (FFACO, 1996). However, for the Underground Test Area (UGTA) CAUs, ''...the objective of the CAI process is to define boundaries around each UGTA CAU that establish areas that contain water that may be unsafe for domestic and municipal use.'', as stated in Appendix VI of the FFACO (1996). According to the UGTA strategy (Appendix VI of the FFACO), the CAI of a given CAU starts with the evaluation of the existing data. New data collection activities are generally contingent upon the results of the modeling and may or may not be part of the CAI. Such is the case for the Frenchman Flat CAU. The current scope of the Frenchman Flat CAI includes the development and use of a three-dimensional (3-D), numerical, CAU-scale groundwater flow and contaminant transport model to predict the location of the contaminant boundary. The CAU model will be developed and used to predict the location of the contaminant boundary. The scope of this CAI does not currently include any characterization activities; however, such activities will be conducted if the CAU model results indicate that further characterization information is needed to develop a sufficiently reliable CAU model. Two areas of importance to the CAU model are the model area and the investigation area. The CAU-model area will be selected to encompass the Frenchman Flat CAU and the region located immediately downgradient where contamination may migrate. The extent of the CAU-model area is dependent on the extent of contamination and is uncertain at this point. The extent of the investigation area is not expected to increase during the CAI.

USDOE/NV

1999-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

129

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 140: Waste Dumps, Burn Pits, and Storage Area, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, July 2002, Rev. No. 0  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan contains the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Operations Office's approach to collect the data necessary to evaluate corrective action alternatives appropriate for the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 140 under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Corrective Action Unit 140 consists of nine Corrective Action Sites (CASs): 05-08-01, Detonation Pits; 05-08-02, Debris Pits; 05-17-01, Hazardous Waste Accumulation Site (Buried); 05-19-01, Waste Disposal Site; 05-23-01, Gravel Gertie; 05-35-01, Burn Pit; 05-99-04, Burn Pit; 22-99-04, Radioactive Waste Dump; 23-17-01, Hazardous Waste Storage Area. All nine of these CASs are located within Areas 5, 22, and 23 of the Nevada Test Site (NTS) in Nevada, approximately 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas. This CAU is being investigated because disposed waste may be present without appropriate controls (i.e., use restrictions, adequate cover) and hazardous and/or radioactive constituents may be present or migrating at concentrations and locations that could potentially pose a threat to human health and the environment. The NTS has been used for various research and development projects including nuclear weapons testing. The CASs in CAU 140 were used for testing, material storage, waste storage, and waste disposal. A two-phase approach has been selected to collect information and generate data to satisfy needed resolution criteria and resolve the decision statements. Phase I will determine if contaminants of potential concern (COPCs) are present in concentrations exceeding preliminary action levels. This data will be evaluated at all CASs. Phase II will determine the extent of the contaminant(s) of concern (COCs). This data will only be evaluated for CASs with a COC identified during Phase I. Based on process knowledge, the COPCs for CAU 140 include volatile organics, semivolatile organics, petroleum hydrocarbons, explosive residues, herbicides, pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls, metals, and radionuclides. The results of this field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of corrective action alternatives in the corrective action decision document.

NNSA /NV

2002-07-18T23:59:59.000Z

130

Waste management plan for the remedial investigation/feasibility study of Waste Area Grouping 5 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

SciTech Connect

This plan defines the criteria and methods to be used for managing waste generated during activities associated with Waste Area Grouping (WAG) 5 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). WAG 5 is located in Melton Valley, south of the main ORNL plant area. It contains 17 solid waste management units (SWMUs) to be evaluated during the remedial investigation. The SWMUs include three burial areas, two hydrofracture facilities, two settling ponds, eight tanks, and two low-level liquid waste leak sites. These locations are all considered to be within the WAG 5 area of contamination (AOC). The plan contains provisions for safely and effectively managing soils, rock cuttings, development and sampling water, decontamination fluids, and disposable personal protective equipment (PPE) consistent with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidance of May 1991 (EPA 1991). Consistent with EPA guidance, this plan is designed to protect the environment and the health and safety of workers and the public.

Not Available

1992-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

131

Waste management plan for the remedial investigation/feasibility study of Waste Area Grouping 5 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Environmental Restoratin Program  

SciTech Connect

This plan defines the criteria and methods to be used for managing waste generated during activities associated with Waste Area Grouping (WAG) 5 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). WAG 5 is located in Melton Valley, south of the main ORNL plant area. It contains 17 solid waste management units (SWMUs) to be evaluated during the remedial investigation. The SWMUs include three burial areas, two hydrofracture facilities, two settling ponds, eight tanks, and two low-level liquid waste leak sites. These locations are all considered to be within the WAG 5 area of contamination (AOC). The plan contains provisions for safely and effectively managing soils, rock cuttings, development and sampling water, decontamination fluids, and disposable personal protective equipment (PPE) consistent with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidance of May 1991 (EPA 1991). Consistent with EPA guidance, this plan is designed to protect the environment and the health and safety of workers and the public.

Not Available

1992-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

132

Energy Efficiency Market Sustainable Business Planning | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Efficiency Market Sustainable Business Planning Energy Efficiency Market Sustainable Business Planning Energy Efficiency Market Sustainable Business Planning, a presentation...

133

Electricity Advisory Committee Meeting Presentations October...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Interconnection-Wide Transmission Planning Processes Electricity Advisory Committee Meeting Presentations October 2011 - Interconnection-Wide Transmission Planning Processes Panel...

134

A study of the future water requirements of the state of Texas and the projected plan to meet them as presented by the United States Study Commission - Texas  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

that my education could be continued. G. W. August, 1963 111 CONTENTS Page List of Tables List of Plates Chapter vi I. Introduction II. Water Resources I II. Water Requirements IV. The Water Development Plan 15 31 34 V. Views and Comments... University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Sanuary, 1964 Major Subject Business Adzninistration A STUDY OF THE FUTURE WATER REQUIREMENTS. OF THE STATE OF TEXAS AND THE PROJECTED PLAN TO MEET...

Wortham, Gene Rye

1964-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

135

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 543: Liquid Disposal Units Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Rev. No.: 0 with ROTC 1 and 2  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) contains project-specific information including facility descriptions, environmental sample collection objectives, and criteria for conducting site investigation activities at Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 543: Liquid Disposal Units, Nevada Test Site (NTS), Nevada. This CAIP has been developed in accordance with the ''Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order'' (FFACO) (1996) that was agreed to by the State of Nevada, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), and the U.S Department of Defense (DoD). Corrective Action Unit 543 is located in Area 6 and Area 15 of the NTS, which is approximately 65 miles (mi) northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada (Figure 1-1). Seven corrective action sites (CASs) comprise CAU 543 and are listed below: (1) 06-07-01, Decon Pad; (2) 15-01-03, Aboveground Storage Tank; (3) 15-04-01, Septic Tank; (4) 15-05-01, Leachfield; (5) 15-08-01, Liquid Manure Tank; (6) 15-23-01, Underground Radioactive Material Area; and (7) 15-23-03, Contaminated Sump, Piping. Corrective Action Site 06-07-01, Decon Pad, is located in Area 6 and consists of the Area 6 Decontamination Facility and its components that are associated with decontamination of equipment, vehicles, and materials related to nuclear testing. The six CASs in Area 15 are located at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Farm and are related to waste disposal activities at the EPA Farm. The EPA Farm was a fully-functional dairy associated with animal experiments conducted at the on-site laboratory. The corrective action investigation (CAI) will include field inspections, video-mole surveys, and sampling of media, where appropriate. Data will also be obtained to support waste management decisions. The CASs within CAU 543 are being investigated because hazardous and/or radioactive constituents may be present at concentrations that could potentially pose a threat to human health and the environment. The seven CASs in CAU 543 primarily consist of sanitary and process waste collection, storage, and distribution systems (e.g., storage tanks, sumps, and piping). Existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination at these sites is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives for the CASs. Therefore, additional information will be obtained by conducting a CAI prior to evaluating corrective action alternatives and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each CAS.

David A. Strand

2004-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

136

Phase 1 RCRA Facility Investigation and Corrective Measures Study Work Plan for Single Shell Tank Waste Management Areas  

SciTech Connect

This document is the master work plan for the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) for single-shell tank (SST) farms at the Hanford Site. Evidence indicates that releases at four of the seven SST waste management areas have impacted.

ROGERS, P.M.

2000-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

137

ERAD 2014 Presentations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2014 ENVIRONMENTAL/RADIOLOGICAL ASSISTANCE DIRECTORY (ERAD) PRESENTATIONS Below are the presentations presented during the 2014 Environmental/Radiological Assistance Directory (ERAD) meetings: Visual Sample Plan (VSP), DOECAP, Radiological and Environmental Sciences Laboratory (RESL) MAPEP

138

Electricity Advisory Committee Meeting Presentations October 2011 -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Interconnection-Wide Transmission Planning Processes Interconnection-Wide Transmission Planning Processes Electricity Advisory Committee Meeting Presentations October 2011 - Interconnection-Wide Transmission Planning Processes Panel Discussion on Interconnection-Wide Transmission Planning Processes Interconnection-Wide Planning in the Eastern Interconnection - David Whiteley, Eastern Interconnection Planning Collaborative WECC Regional Transmission Expansion Planning (RTEP)10 year plan - Brad Nickell, Western Electricity Coordinating Council Transmission Planning in the ERCOT Interconnection 2011 - Warren Lasher, Electric Reliability Council of Texas EAC Presentation - Interconnection-Wide Planning in the Eastern Interconnection 2011 - Whiteley.pdf EAC Presentation - WECC Regional Transmission Expansion Planning (RTEP)10

139

May 15, 2012, Federal Technical Capability Program Face to Face Meeting … Presentation: FY 2012 Operational Plan Goal Objective 4 Status  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Plan Plan Goal 1 Objective 4 Goal 1 Objective 4 Expert-Level Discussion Expert-Level Discussion  FTCP Issue Paper, FTCP-10-004, Clarify  FTCP Issue Paper, FTCP 10 004, Clarify Qualification Process » Re-evaluate the definition of expert level in functional area qualification standards. » Focused on one issue, the use of the term "expert" in the TQP C id i f h i i i di d f » Consideration of the issue raises a question regarding need for knowledge level in FAQS competencies » Team decided, based on feedback, to leave the knowledge » Team decided, based on feedback, to leave the knowledge level in competency statements alone 2 Expert-Level Discussion  The team recommends that the FTC Panel decide  The team recommends that the FTC Panel decide which of the following approaches best meets the

140

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 486: Double Tracks RADSAFE Ares, Nellis Air Force Range, Nevada, Rev. 0; DOE/NV--523 UPDATED WITH ROTC No.1 and 2  

SciTech Connect

This CAIP presents a plan to investigate the DTRSA where unregulated disposal of radioactive and possibly hazardous waste occurred during decontamination activities for the Double Tracks test. The purpose of the corrective action investigation described in this CAIP is to: Identify and verify the locations of the decontamination facility and animal burial pit within the DTRSA; Identify the presence and nature of COPCs; Determine the vertical and lateral extent of COPCs; and Provide sufficient information and data to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for the CAS. This CAIP was developed using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Data Quality Objectives (DQOs) (EPA, 1994d) process to clearly define the goals for collecting environmental data, to determine data uses, and to design a data collection program that will satisfy these uses. A DQO scoping meeting was held prior to preparation of this plan; a brief summary of the DQOs is presented in Section 3.4. A more detailed summary of the DQO process and results is included in Appendix A.

ITLV

1999-11-16T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "investigation planning presentation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Remedial investigation work plan for Bear Creek Valley Operable Unit 4 (shallow groundwater in Bear Creek Valley) at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

SciTech Connect

The enactment of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) in 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) to RCRA in 1984 created management requirements for hazardous waste fadities. The facilities within the Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) were in the process of meeting the RCRA requirements when ORR was placed on the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCIA) National Priorities List (NPL) on November 21, 1989. Under RCRA, the actions typically follow the RCRA Facility Assessment (RIFA)/RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI)/Coffective Measures Study (CMS)/Corrective Measures Implementation process. Under CERCLA, the actions follow the Pre@ary Assessment/Site Investigation (PA/Sl) Remedial Investigation Feasibility Study (RI/FS)/Remedial Design/Remedial Action process. The development of this document will incorporate requirements under both RCRA and CERCIA into an RI Work Plan for the lint phase of characterization of Bear Creek Valley (BCV) Operable Unit (OU) 4.

Not Available

1992-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

142

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 151: Septic Systems and Discharge Area, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Rev. No.: 0  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) contains project-specific information for conducting site investigation activities at Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 151: Septic Systems and Discharge Area, Nevada Test Site, Nevada. Information presented in this CAIP includes facility descriptions, environmental sample collection objectives, and criteria for the selection and evaluation of environmental corrective action alternatives. Corrective Action Unit 151 is located in Areas 2, 12, 18, and 20 of the Nevada Test Site, which is 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. Corrective Action Unit 151 is comprised of the nine Corrective Action Sites (CAS) listed below: (1) 02-05-01, UE-2ce Pond; (2) 12-03-01, Sewage Lagoons (6); (3) 12-04-01, Septic Tanks; (4) 12-04-02, Septic Tanks; (5) 12-04-03, Septic Tank; (6) 12-47-01, Wastewater Pond; (7) 18-03-01, Sewage Lagoon; (8) 18-99-09, Sewer Line (Exposed); and (9) 20-19-02, Photochemical Drain. The CASs within CAU 151 are discharge and collection systems. Corrective Action Site 02-05-01 is located in Area 2 and is a well-water collection pond used as a part of the Nash test. Corrective Action Sites 12-03-01, 12-04-01, 12-04-02, 12-04-03, and 12-47-01 are located in Area 12 and are comprised of sewage lagoons, septic tanks, associated piping, and two sumps. The features are a part of the Area 12 Camp housing and administrative septic systems. Corrective Action Sites 18-03-01 and 18-99-09 are located in the Area 17 Camp in Area 18. These sites are sewage lagoons and associated piping. The origin and terminus of CAS 18-99-09 are unknown; however, the type and configuration of the pipe indicates that it may be a part of the septic systems in Area 18. Corrective Action Site 20-19-02 is located in the Area 20 Camp. This site is comprised of a surface discharge of photoprocessing chemicals.

David A. Strand

2004-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

143

Management Plan Management Plan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

; and 5) consistency with the Endangered Species Act and Clean Water Act. In addition, the management plan Plan, Management Plan Page MP­ 1 #12;Management Plan water quality standards, instream flows, privateManagement Plan Management Plan "Management and restoration programs for native salmonids have

144

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

in Western Utility Energy Efficiency in Western Utility in Western Utility Energy Efficiency in Western Utility Resource Plans Resource Plans Implications for Regional Assessments and Implications for Regional Assessments and Initiatives Initiatives Charles Goldman Nicole Hopper Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory CREPC Meeting San Diego, CA September 28, 2006 Overview of Presentation Overview of Presentation * LBNL/CREPC Resource Assessment Project - Overview - Data Sources * Treatment of Energy Efficiency (EE) in Resource Plans - Why does it matter? * Energy Efficiency in Recent Resource Plans: - Common Inconsistencies and Data Problems - Levels of EE Proposed in Recent Utility Resource Plans * Recommendations and tools for tracking and reporting EE in future resource plans to support West-wide goals and analysis LBNL/CREPC Resource Assessment Project LBNL/CREPC Resource Assessment Project

145

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 545: Dumps, Waste Disposal Sites, and Buried Radioactive Materials Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit 545, Dumps, Waste Disposal Sites, and Buried Radioactive Materials, consists of seven inactive sites located in the Yucca Flat area and one inactive site in the Pahute Mesa area. The eight CAU 545 sites consist of craters used for mud disposal, surface or buried waste disposed within craters or potential crater areas, and sites where surface or buried waste was disposed. The CAU 545 sites were used to support nuclear testing conducted in the Yucca Flat area during the 1950s through the early 1990s, and in Area 20 in the mid-1970s. This Corrective Action Investigation Plan has been developed in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order that was agreed to by the State of Nevada, the U.S. Department of Energy, and the U.S. Department of Defense. Under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, this Corrective Action Investigation Plan will be submitted to the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for approval. Fieldwork will be conducted following approval.

Alfred Wickline

2007-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

146

Measurement and Analysis Plan for Investigation of Spent-Fuel Assay Using Lead Slowing-Down Spectroscopy  

SciTech Connect

Under funding from the Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energys Materials, Protection, Accounting, and Control for Transmutation (MPACT) program (formerly the Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative Safeguards Campaign), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) and Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) are collaborating to study the viability of lead slowing-down spectroscopy (LSDS) for spent-fuel assay. Based on the results of previous simulation studies conducted by PNNL and LANL to estimate potential LSDS performance, a more comprehensive study of LSDS viability has been defined. That study includes benchmarking measurements, development and testing of key enabling instrumentation, and continued study of time-spectra analysis methods. This report satisfies the requirements for a PNNL/LANL deliverable that describes the objectives, plans and contributing organizations for a comprehensive three-year study of LSDS for spent-fuel assay. This deliverable was generated largely during the LSDS workshop held on August 25-26, 2009 at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI). The workshop itself was a prominent milestone in the FY09 MPACT project and is also described within this report.

Smith, Leon E.; Haas, Derek A.; Gavron, Victor A.; Imel, G. R.; Ressler, Jennifer J.; Bowyer, Sonya M.; Danon, Y.; Beller, D.

2009-09-25T23:59:59.000Z

147

Methods to Model and Calculate Capacity Contributions of Variable Generation for Resource Adequacy Planning (IVGTF1-2): Additional Discussion (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect

This presentation addresses specific actions, practices and requirements, including enhancements to existing or development of new reliability standards.

Milligan, M.

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

148

September 13, 2011, Federal Technical Capability Program Face to Face Meeting … Presentation: FY 2011 Operational Plan Goal Status for Goal 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

f f Functional Area Qualification Standards Enhancements Deborah Monette, Champion Mark Alsdorf, Carol Ingram, Barry Weaver Team Leaders  Status: ◦ Developed FTCP Issue Paper FTCP-10-004  SME definition/process  Evaluate/recommend "expert"-level definition/use  Define and evaluate criteria for provisional qualification  Recommendations:  Recommendations: 1. Accept SME definition/process from FTCP FY09 Operational Plan Goal 3 2. FTCP decision needed on expert-level knowledge definition in FAQSs 1. delete all reference to any competency knowledge level in FAQSs, d l ll f l l k l d 2. delete all reference to expert-level knowledge requirements in FAQSs, 3. retain the FAQS expert-level definition as written, 4. modify the FAQS expert-level definition to read "Expert level is defined as a

149

May 15, 2012, Federal Technical Capability Program Face to Face Meeting … Presentation: Technical Training Needs Assessment (TNA)/Individual Development Plan (IDP) and Continuing Education  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Training Needs Training Needs Assessment (TNA)/Individual Assessment (TNA)/Individual Development Plan (IDP) and Continuing Education Continuing Education Las Vegas, NV May 15 2012 May 15, 2012 TNA/IDP and Continuing Education Objective Goal: Integrate the numerous Departmental training Objective Goal: Integrate the numerous Departmental training needs assessments into one viable tool that includes input from IDPs and includes continuing education.  Determine the needs and purpose of a TNA  Conducted 3 meetings with NTC, LDTS, Project Management, and A i i i M R i Acquisition Management Representatives  Identified current processes  Identified assessment timing and most desired outcomes  Identified assessment timing and most desired outcomes Effort put on hold until July 1 due to conduct of FY13 TNAs

150

Strategic Plan  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Strategic Plan science-innovationassetsimagesicon-science.jpg Strategic Plan x Strategic Plan Los Alamos National Laboratory Strategic Plan - 2014 (pdf) Our Strategic Plan...

151

Remedial Investigation work plan for Bear Creek Valley Operable Unit 4 (shallow groundwater in Bear Creek Valley) at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

SciTech Connect

To effectively evaluate the cumulative impact of releases from multiple sources of contamination, a structured approach has been adopted for Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) based on studies of the groundwater and surface water separate from studies of the sources. Based on the realization of the complexity of the hydrogeologic regime of the ORR, together with the fact that there are numerous sources contributing to groundwater contamination within a geographical area, it was agreed that more timely investigations, at perhaps less cost, could be achieved by separating the sources of contamination from the groundwater and surface water for investigation and remediation. The result will be more immediate attention [Records of Decision (RODS) for interim measures or removal actions] for the source Operable Units (OUs) while longer-term remediation investigations continue for the hydrogeologic regime`s, which are labeled as integrator OUs. This Remedial Investigation work plan contains summaries of geographical, historical, operational, geological, and hydrological information specific to the unit. Taking advantage of the historical data base and ongoing monitoring activities and applying the observational approach to focus data gathering activities will allow the Feasibility Study to evaluate all probable or likely alternatives.

Not Available

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

152

Field Sampling and Analysis Plan for the Remedial Investigation of Waste Area Grouping 2 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Responses to comments  

SciTech Connect

This report provides responses to US Environmental Protection Agency Region IV EPA-M and Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Oversite Division (TDEC-O) comments on report ORNL/ER-58, Field Sampling and Analysis Plan for the Remedial Investigation of Waste Area Grouping 2 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Waste Area Grouping (WAG) 2 consists of the White Oak Creek (WOC) drainage system downgradient of the major ORNL WAGs in the WOC watershed. A strategy for the remedial investigation (RI) of WAG2 was developed in report ES/ER-14&Dl, Remedial Investigation Plan for Waste Area Grouping 2 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. This strategy takes full advantage of WAG2`s role as an integrator of contaminant releases from the ORNL WAGs in the WOC watershed, and takes full advantage of WAG2`s role as a conduit for contaminants from the ORNL site to the Clinch River. The strategy calls for a multimedia environmental monitoring and characterization program to be conducted in WAG2 while upgradient contaminant sources are being remediated. This monitoring and characterization program will (1) identify and quantify contaminant fluxes, (2) identify pathways of greatest concern for human health and environmental risk, (3) improve conceptual models of contaminant movement, (4) support the evaluation of remedial alternatives, (5) support efforts to prioritize sites for remediation, (6) document the reduction in contaminant fluxes following remediation, and (7) support the eventual remediation of WAG2. Following this strategy, WAG2 has been termed an ``integrator WAG,`` and efforts in WAG2 over the short term are directed toward supporting efforts to remediate the contaminant ``source WAGS`` at ORNL.

Not Available

1992-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

153

Jan 8 2012 RAP Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

in upcoming RODs 84 52 Total waste sites included in ROD 291 286 Decision Process * Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study * Draft A Proposed Plan - Regulatory Agency...

154

Technology Survey to Support Revision to the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Work Plan for the 200-SW-2 Operable Unit at the U.S. Department of Energys Hanford Site  

SciTech Connect

A survey of technologies was conducted to provide information for a Data Quality Objectives process being conducted to support revision of the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Work Plan for the 200-SW-2 Operable Unit. The technology survey considered remediation and characterization technologies. This effort was conducted to address, in part, comments on the previous version of the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Work Plan for the 200-SW-2 Operable Unit as documented in 200SW1 and 200SW2 Collaborative Workshops?Agreement, Completion Matrix, and Supporting Documentation. By providing a thorough survey of remediation and characterization options, this report is intended to enable the subsequent data quality objectives and work plan revision processes to consider the full range of potential alternatives for planning of the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study activities.

Truex, Michael J.; Johnson, Christian D.; Nimmons, Michael J.

2007-09-25T23:59:59.000Z

155

Waste Management Plan for the Remedial Investigation of Waste Area Grouping 10, Operable Unit 3, at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Environmental Restoration Program  

SciTech Connect

This Waste Management Plan (WMP) supplements the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) Project WMP and defines the criteria and methods to be used for managing and characterizing waste generated during activities associated with the RI of 23 wells near the Old Hydrofracture Facility (OHF). These wells are within the Waste Area Grouping (WAG) 5 area of contamination (AOC) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). Field activities for the limited RI of Operable Unit (OU) 3 of WAG 10 will involve sampling and measurement of various environmental media (e.g., liquids and gases). Many of these activities will occur in areas known to be contaminated with radioactive materials or hazardous chemical substances, and it is anticipated that contaminated solid and liquid wastes and noncontaminated wastes will be generated as a result of these activities. On a project-wide basis, handling of these waste materials will be accomplished in accordance with the RI/FS Project WMP and the procedures referenced throughout the plan.

Not Available

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

156

SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION Plan Name: MCWAH Vision Plan [Plan # 505  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

to pay for such coverage. Review this summary plan description and the documents governing the planSUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION Plan Name: MCWAH Vision Plan [Plan # 505] Plan Type: Group Vision Insurance Plan Year: July 1 ­ June 30 Employer\\Policyholder\\Plan Administrator\\Plan Sponsor: Medical College

157

AMIE (ARM MJO Investigation Experiment): Observations of the Madden-Julian Oscillation for Modeling Studies Science Plan  

SciTech Connect

Deep convection in the tropics plays an important role in driving global circulations and the transport of energy from the tropics to the mid-latitudes. Understanding the mechanisms that control tropical convection is a key to improving climate modeling simulations of the global energy balance. One of the dominant sources of tropical convective variability is the Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO), which has a period of approximately 3060 days. There is no agreed-upon explanation for the underlying physics that maintain the MJO. Many climate models do not show well-defined MJO signals, and those that do have problems accurately simulating the amplitude, propagation speed, and/or seasonality of the MJO signal. Therefore, the MJO is a very important modeling target for the ARM modeling community geared specifically toward improving climate models. The ARM MJO Investigation Experiment (AMIE) period coincides with a large international MJO initiation field campaign called CINDY2011 (Cooperative Indian Ocean experiment on intraseasonal variability in the Year 2011) that will take place in and around the Indian Ocean from October 2011 to January 2012. AMIE, in conjunction with CINDY2011 efforts, will provide an unprecedented data set that will allow investigation of the evolution of convection within the framework of the MJO. AMIE observations will also complement the long-term MJO statistics produced using ARM Manus data and will allow testing of several of the current hypotheses related to the MJO phenomenon. Taking advantage of the expected deployment of a C-POL scanning precipitation radar and an ECOR surface flux tower at the ARM Manus site, we propose to increase the number of sonde launches to eight per day starting in about mid-October of the field experiment year, which is climatologically a period of generally suppressed conditions at Manus and just prior to the climatologically strongest MJO period. The field experiment will last until the end of the MJO season (typically March), affording the documentation of conditions before, during, and after the peak MJO season. The increased frequency of sonde launches throughout the experimental period will provide better diurnal understanding of the thermodynamic profiles, and thus a better representation within the variational analysis data set. Finally, a small surface radiation and ceilometer system will be deployed at the PNG Lombrum Naval Base about 6 km away from the ARM Manus site in order to provide some documentation of scale variability with respect to the representativeness of the ARM measurements.

Long, C; Del Genio, A; Gustafson, W; Houze, R; Jakob, C; Jensen, M; Klein, S; Leung, L Ruby; Liu, X; Luke, E; May, P; McFarlane, S; Minnis, P; Schumacher, C; Vogelmann, A; Wang, Y; Wu, X; Xie, S

2010-03-22T23:59:59.000Z

158

Site characterization plan: Conceptual design report: Volume 4, Appendices F-O: Nevada Nuclear Waste Storage Investigations Project  

SciTech Connect

The site for the prospective repository is located at Yucca Mountain in southwestern Nevada, and the waste emplacement area will be constructed in the underlying volcanic tuffs. The target horizon for waste emplacement is a sloping bed of densely welded tuff more than 650 ft below the surface and typically more than 600 ft above the water table. The conceptual design described in this report is unique among repository designs in that it uses ramps in addition to shafts to gain access to the underground facility, the emplacement horizon is located above the water table, and it is possible that 300- to 400-ft-long horizontal waste emplacement boreholes will be used. This report summarizes the design bases, design and performance criteria, and the design analyses performed. The current status of meeting the preclosure performance objectives for licensing and of resolving the repository design and preclosure issues is presented. The repository design presented in this report will be expanded and refined during the advanced conceptual design, the license application design, and the final procurement and construction design phases. Volume 4 contains Appendices F to O.

MacDougall, H R; Scully, L W; Tillerson, J R [comps.] [comps.

1987-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

159

Site characterization plan: Conceptual design report: Volume 5, Appendices P-R: Nevada Nuclear Waste Storage Investigations Project  

SciTech Connect

The site for the prospective respository is located at Yucca Mountain in southwestern Nevada, and the waste emplacement area will be constructed in the underlying volcanic tuffs. The target horizon for waste emplacement is a sloping bed of densely welded tuff more than 650 ft below the surface and typically more than 600 ft above the water table. The conceptual design described in this report is unique among repository designs in that it uses ramps in addition to shafts to gain access to the underground facility, the emplacement horizon is located above the water table, and it is possible that 300- to 400-ft-long horizontal waste emplacement boreholes will be used. This report summarizes the design bases, design and performance criteria, and the design analyses performed. The current status of meeting the preclosure performance objectives for licensing and of resolving the repository design and preclosure issues is presented. The repository design presented in this report will be expanded and refined during the advanced conceptual design, the license application design, and the final procurement and construction design phases. Volume 5 contains appendices P through R.

MacDougall, H.R.; Scully, L.W.; Tillerson, J.R. (comps.)

1987-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

160

National Solar Water Heater Workshop Present at DOE Region V meeting for managers of State Energy Extension Service and State Energy Conservation Plan, March 18-19, 1981  

SciTech Connect

After a brief description of the National Solar Water Heater Workshop and some comments by users of the solar water heater, the hardware supplier handbook is presented. The performance expected of a hardware supplier is described, solar system components and their specifications are listed, and information is provided to assist the hardware supplier in obtaining necessary materials. (LEW)

Mumma, S.A.; Marinello, M.G.

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "investigation planning presentation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 34: Area 3 Contaminated Waste Site, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (Rev. 0, March 2001)  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan contains the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Operations Office's approach to collect the data necessary to evaluate corrective action alternatives appropriate for the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 34 under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Corrective Action Unit 34 consists of four Corrective Action Sites (CASs). The CAU is located within the Area 3 Compound at the Nevada Test Site (NTS) in the vicinity of the Mud Plant Facility in Yucca Valley. Historically, CAS 03-09-07, Mud Pit, was used for disposal of excess mud from washing drilling equipment from 1968 to 1974, at which time it began to be used for excess mud disposal (currently inactive); CAS 03-44-01, Chromium Contamination Spill, was used to store additives used in the formulation of drilling mud from the early 1960s to the mid-1990s; CAS 03-47-02, Area 3 Mud Plant Pond, was used as a freshwater storage reservoir for the mud plant as well as supplied water for a number of activities including the mixing of mud, the rinsing and cleaning of tanks, and various washdowns from the 1960s through 1990s; and CAS 03-09-06, Mud Disposal Crater, was created in 1962 by an underground nuclear detonation (i.e., Chinchilla test) and was used to mix and store mud, dispose of receiving waste from the mud plant floor drains and excess drilling mud, and clean/flush mix tanks through the mid-1990s. Based on site history, the scope of this plan is to identify potentially contaminated ground soil at each of the four CASs and determine the quantity, nature, and extent of contaminants of potential concern (COPCs). The investigation will include systematic and biased surface and subsurface soil and mud sampling using hand-auguring and direct-push techniques; visual, video, and/or electromagnetic surveys of pipes; field screening for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and alpha/beta-emitting radionuclides; and laboratory analysis to characterize any investigation-derived waste for disposal both on site at NTS and at off-site locations. Historical information provided by former NTS employees indicates that COPCs include VOCs, semivolatile organic compounds, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act metals, petroleum hydrocarbons, gamma-emitting radionuclides, isotopic plutonium, and strontium-90. The results of this field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of corrective action alternatives in the corrective action decision document.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Operations Office

2001-03-27T23:59:59.000Z

162

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 204: Storage Bunkers, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (December 2002, Revision No.: 0), Including Record of Technical Change No. 1  

SciTech Connect

The Corrective Action Investigation Plan contains the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Operations Office's approach to collect the data necessary to evaluate corrective action alternatives appropriate for the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 204 under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Corrective Action Unit 204 is located on the Nevada Test Site approximately 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. This CAU is comprised of six Corrective Action Sites (CASs) which include: 01-34-01, Underground Instrument House Bunker; 02-34-01, Instrument Bunker; 03-34-01, Underground Bunker; 05-18-02, Chemical Explosives Storage; 05-33-01, Kay Blockhouse; 05-99-02, Explosive Storage Bunker. Based on site history, process knowledge, and previous field efforts, contaminants of potential concern for Corrective Action Unit 204 collectively include radionuclides, beryllium, high explosives, lead, polychlorinated biphenyls, total petroleum hydrocarbons, silver, warfarin, and zinc phosphide. The primary question for the investigation is: ''Are existing data sufficient to evaluate appropriate corrective actions?'' To address this question, resolution of two decision statements is required. Decision I is to ''Define the nature of contamination'' by identifying any contamination above preliminary action levels (PALs); Decision II is to ''Determine the extent of contamination identified above PALs. If PALs are not exceeded, the investigation is completed. If PALs are exceeded, then Decision II must be resolved. In addition, data will be obtained to support waste management decisions. Field activities will include radiological land area surveys, geophysical surveys to identify any subsurface metallic and nonmetallic debris, field screening for applicable contaminants of potential concern, collection and analysis of surface and subsurface soil samples from biased locations, and step-out sampling to define the extent of contamination, as necessary. The results of this field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of corrective action alternatives in the corrective action decision document.

NNSA /NSO

2002-12-12T23:59:59.000Z

163

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 224: Decon Pad and Septic Systems Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Rev. No.: 0, with ROTC 1 and 2  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) contains project-specific information including facility descriptions, environmental sample collection objectives, and criteria for conducting site investigation activities at Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 224: Decon Pad and Septic Systems, Nevada Test Site (NTS), Nevada. This CAIP has been developed in accordance with the ''Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order'' (FFACO) (1996) that was agreed to by the State of Nevada, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), and the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD). The NTS is approximately 65 miles (mi) northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada (Figure 1-1). Corrective Action Unit 224 is comprised of the nine Corrective Action Sites (CASs) listed below: 02-04-01, Septic Tank (Buried); 03-05-01, Leachfield; 05-04-01, Septic Tanks (4)/Discharge Area; 06-03-01, Sewage Lagoons (3); 06-05-01, Leachfield; 06-17-04, Decon Pad and Wastewater Catch; 06-23-01, Decon Pad Discharge Piping; 11-04-01, Sewage Lagoon; and 23-05-02, Leachfield. Corrective Action Sites 06-05-01, 06-23-01, and 23-05-02 were identified in the 1991 Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co., Inc. (REECo) inventory (1991). The remaining sites were identified during review of various historical documents. Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation (CAI) prior to evaluating and selecting a corrective action alternative for each CAS. The CAI will include field inspections, radiological and geological surveys, and sample collection. Data will also be obtained to support investigation-derived waste (IDW) disposal and potential future waste management decisions.

David A. Strand

2004-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

164

Final work plan : phase I investigation of potential contamination at the former CCC/USDA grain storage facility in Montgomery City, Missouri.  

SciTech Connect

From September 1949 until September 1966, the Commodity Credit Corporation of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (CCC/USDA) leased property at the southeastern end of Montgomery City, Missouri, for the operation of a grain storage facility. During this time, commercial grain fumigants containing carbon tetrachloride were commonly used by the CCC/USDA and the private grain storage industry to preserve grain in their facilities. In January 2000, carbon tetrachloride was detected in a soil sample (220 {micro}g/kg) and two soil gas samples (58 {micro}g/m{sup 3} and 550 {micro}g/m{sup 3}) collected at the former CCC/USDA facility, as a result of a pre-CERCLIS site screening investigation (SSI) performed by TN & Associates, Inc., on behalf of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region VII (MoDNR 2001). In June 2001, the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MoDNR) conducted further sampling of the soils and groundwater at the former CCC/USDA facility as part of a preliminary assessment/site inspection (PA/SI). The MoDNR confirmed the presence of carbon tetrachloride (at a maximum identified concentration of 2,810 {micro}g/kg) and chloroform (maximum 82 {micro}g/kg) in the soils and also detected carbon tetrachloride and chloroform (42.2 {micro}g/L and 58.4 {micro}g/L, respectively) in a groundwater sample collected at the former facility (MoDNR 2001). The carbon tetrachloride levels identified in the soils and groundwater are above the default target level (DTL) values established by the MoDNR for this contaminant in soils of all types (79.6 {micro}g/kg) and in groundwater (5.0 {micro}g/L), as outlined in Missouri Risk-Based Corrective Action (MRBCA): Departmental Technical Guidance (MoDNR 2006a). The corresponding MRBCA DTL values for chloroform are 76.6 {micro}g/kg in soils of all types and 80 {micro}g/L in groundwater. Because the observed contamination at Montgomery City might be linked to the past use of carbon tetrachloride-based fumigants at its former grain storage facility, the CCC/USDA will conduct investigations to (1) characterize the source(s), extent, and factors controlling the possible subsurface distribution and movement of carbon tetrachloride at the Montgomery City site and (2) evaluate the health and environmental threats potentially represented by the contamination. This work will be performed in accord with the Intergovernmental Agreement established between the Farm Service Agency of the USDA and the MoDNR, to address carbon tetrachloride contamination potentially associated with a number of former CCC/USDA grain storage facilities in Missouri. The investigations at Montgomery City will be conducted on behalf of the CCC/USDA by the Environmental Science Division of Argonne National Laboratory. Argonne is a nonprofit, multidisciplinary research center operated by UChicago Argonne, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The CCC/USDA has entered into an agreement with DOE, under which Argonne provides technical assistance to the CCC/USDA with environmental site characterization and remediation at its former grain storage facilities. The site characterization at Montgomery City will take place in phases. This approach is recommended by the CCC/USDA and Argonne, so that information obtained and interpretations developed during each incremental stage of the investigation can be used most effectively to guide subsequent phases of the program. This site-specific Work Plan outlines the specific technical objectives and scope of work proposed for Phase I of the Montgomery City investigation. This Work Plan also includes the community relations plan to be followed throughout the CCC/USDA program at the Montgomery City site. Argonne is developing a Master Work Plan specific to operations in the state of Missouri. In the meantime, Argonne has issued a Provisional Master Work Plan (PMWP; Argonne 2007) that has been reviewed and approved by the MoDNR for current use. The PMWP (Argonne 2007) provides detailed information and guidance on the investigative technologies, analytical methodologies, qua

LaFreniere, L. M.; Environmental Science Division

2010-08-16T23:59:59.000Z

165

PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLANS Project Management Plans  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MANAGEMENT PLANS MANAGEMENT PLANS Project Management Plans  Overview  Project Management Plan Suggested Outline Subjects  Crosswalk between the Suggested PMP Outline Subjects and a Listing of Project Planning Elements  Elements of Deactivation Project Planning  Examples From Project Management Plans Overview The purpose here is to assist project managers and project planners in creating a project plan by providing examples and pointing to information that have been successfully used by others in the past. Section 4.2 of DOE Guide 430.1-3, DEACTIVATION IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE discusses the content and purpose of deactivation project management plans. It is presented as a suggested outline followed by other potential subjects. For the convenience of readers, that information is repeated below.

166

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 370: T-4 Atmospheric Test Site, Nevada Test Site, Nevada with ROTC-1, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 370 is located in Area 4 of the Nevada Test Site, which is approximately 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. Corrective Action Unit 370 is comprised of Corrective Action Site (CAS) 04-23-01, Atmospheric Test Site T-4. This site is being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and/or implement a corrective action. Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation (CAI) before evaluating corrective action alternatives and selecting the appropriate corrective action for this CAS. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable corrective action alternatives that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document. The investigation results may also be used to evaluate improvements in the Soils Project strategy to be implemented. The site will be investigated based on the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on December 10, 2007, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection; U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office; Desert Research Institute; Stoller-Navarro Joint Venture; and National Security Technologies, LLC. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAU 370. Appendix A provides a detailed discussion of the DQO methodology and the DQOs specific to the CAS. The scope of the CAI for CAU 370 includes the following activities: Move surface debris and/or materials, as needed, to facilitate sampling. Conduct radiological surveys. Perform field screening. Collect and submit environmental samples for laboratory analysis to determine whether contaminants of concern are present. If contaminants of concern are present, collect samples to define the extent of the contamination. Collect samples of investigation-derived waste including debris deemed to be potential source material, as needed, for waste management purposes.

Pat Matthews

2008-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

167

Western Renewable Energy Zones (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect

This presentation summarizes recent developments and trends pertaining to competitive renewable energy zones, transmission planning and the integration of renewable generation resources.

Hein, J.

2011-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

168

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 556: Dry Wells and Surface Release Points Nevada Test Site, Nevada (Draft), Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 556, Dry Wells and Surface Release Points, is located in Areas 6 and 25 of the Nevada Test Site, 65miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. Corrective Action Unit 556 is comprised of four corrective action sites (CASs) listed below: 06-20-04, National Cementers Dry Well 06-99-09, Birdwell Test Hole 25-60-03, E-MAD Stormwater Discharge and Piping 25-64-01, Vehicle Washdown and Drainage Pit These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives. Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation before evaluating corrective action alternatives and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each CAS. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable corrective action alternatives that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document.

Grant Evenson

2007-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

169

11 - Mobile Robot Path, Motion, and Task Planning  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Robot planning is a special case of general planning, which is concerned with the problem of figuring out how the robots should move to get from one place to another, and how to perform a desired task. Actually, the term planning means different things to different scientific communities (artificial intelligence, management, production engineering, etc.). The objectives of this chapter are (i) to present the general conceptual definition of robot path planning, motion planning, and task planning, (ii) to investigate the path planning problem of mobile robots, including the basic operations and classification of methods, (iii) to study in some detail the model-based mobile robot path planning, including configuration space and road map planning methods, (iv) to discuss mobile robot motion planning presenting the vector fields method and the analytical parameterized method, and (v) to outline the basic issues of fixed and mobile robot task planning, including plan representation and generation, and the three phases of task planning, namely, world modeling, task specification, and robot program synthesis.

Spyros G. Tzafestas

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

170

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 271: Areas 25, 26, and 27 Septic Systems, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (Rev. 0, April 2001)  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan contains the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Operations Office's approach to collect the data necessary to evaluate corrective action alternatives appropriate for the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 271 under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Corrective Action Unit 271 consists of 15 Corrective Action Sites (CASs) including: thirteen Septic Systems (25-04-01, 25-04-03, 25-04-04, 25-04-08, 25-04-09, 25-04-10, 25-04-11, 26-04-01, 26-04-02, 26-05-03, 26-05-04, 26-05-05, and 27-05-02), one Contaminated Water Reservoir (26-03-01), and one Radioactive Leachfield (26-05-01). The CASs addressed by CAU 271 are located at Guard Station 500, the Reactor Control Point (RCP), Bare Reactor Experiment - Nevada Tower, and Engine Test State-1 (ETS-1) facilities in Area 25; the Port Gaston and Project Pluto facilities in Area 26; and the Baker Site in Area 27 of the Nevada Test Site. Between 1 958 and 1973, the RCP and ETS-1 facilities supported the development and testing of nuclear reactors for space propulsion as part of the Nuclear Rocket Development Station. The Project Pluto facilities supported nuclear reactor testing for use as a ramjet propulsion system between 1961 and 1964, followed by similar use for other projects through the early 1980s. The Baker Site facilities were constructed in the 1960s to serve as the staging point where the manufactured components of nuclear devices were assembled, disassembled, and modified. The scope of the investigation strategy at these sites will involve biased and random soil sampling in leachfields using excavation (with drilling as a contingency), collection of soil samples underlying the base of proximal and distal ends of septic tanks and distal ends of distribution structures, defining the lateral and vertical extent of contamination through discrete field and possible stepout location sampling, collection system line inspection, and geotechnical/ hydrological laboratory analyses. Based on site history and existing characterization data gathered to support the Data Quality Objectives process, it is believed that the contaminants of potential concern at these CASs may include: volatile organic compounds, fecal coliform bacteria, semivolatile organic compounds, petroleum hydrocarbons, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act metals, gamma-emitting radionuclides, isotopic uranium, strontium-90, tritium, beryllium, polychlorinated biphenyls, pesticides, and herbicides. The results of this field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of corrective action alternatives in the Corrective Action Decision Document.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Operations Office

2001-04-09T23:59:59.000Z

171

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 490: Station 44 Burn Area, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada (with Record of Technical Change No.1)  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) contains the U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office's approach to collect the data necessary to evaluate corrective action alternatives appropriate for the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 490 under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Corrective Active Unit 490 consists of four Corrective Action Sites (CASs): 03-56-001-03BA, Fire Training Area (FTA); RG-56-001-RGBA, Station 44 Burn Area; 03-58-001-03FN, Sandia Service Yard; and 09-54-001-09L2, Gun Propellant Burn Area. These CASs are located at the Tonopah Test Range near Areas 3 and 9. Historically, the FTA was used for training exercises where tires and wood were ignited with diesel fuel. Records indicate that water and carbon dioxide were the only extinguishing agents used during these training exercises. The Station 44 Burn Area was used for fire training exercises and consisted of two wooden structures. The two burn areas (ignition of tires, wood, and wooden structures with diesel fuel and water) were limited to the building footprints (10 ft by 10 ft each). The Sandia Service Yard was used for storage (i.e., wood, tires, metal, electronic and office equipment, construction debris, and drums of oil/grease) from approximately 1979 to 1993. The Gun Propellant Burn Area was used from the 1960s to 1980s to burn excess artillery gun propellant, solid-fuel rocket motors, black powder, and deteriorated explosives; additionally, the area was used for the disposal of experimental explosive items. Based on site history, the focus of the field investigation activities will be to: (1) determine the presence of contaminants of potential concern (COPCs) at each CAS, (2) determine if any COPCs exceed field-screening levels and/or preliminary action levels, and (3) determine the nature and extent of contamination with enough certainty to support selection of corrective action alternatives for each CAS. The scope of this CAIP is to resolve the question of whether or not potentially hazardous wastes were generated at three of the four CASs within CAU 490, and whether or not potentially hazardous and radioactive wastes were generated at the fourth CAS in CAU 490 (CAS 09-54-001-09L2). Suspected CAS-specific COPCs include volatile organic compounds, semivolatile organic compounds, total petroleum hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyls, pesticides, explosives, and uranium and plutonium isotopes. The results of this field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of corrective action alternatives in the corrective action decision document.

U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office

2000-06-09T23:59:59.000Z

172

Modeling for System Integration Studies (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect

This presentation describes some the data requirements needed for grid integration modeling and provides real-world examples of such data and its format. Renewable energy integration studies evaluate the operational impacts of variable generation. Transmission planning studies investigate where new transmission is needed to transfer energy from generation sources to load centers. Both use time-synchronized wind and solar energy production and load as inputs. Both examine high renewable energy penetration scenarios in the future.

Orwig, K. D.

2012-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

173

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 372: Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 372 is located in Areas 18 and 20 of the Nevada Test Site, which is approximately 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. Corrective Action Unit 372 is comprised of the four corrective action sites (CASs) listed below: 18-45-02, Little Feller I Surface Crater 18-45-03, Little Feller II Surface Crater 20-23-01, U-20k Contamination Area 20-45-01, U-20L Crater (Cabriolet) These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives. Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation (CAI) before evaluating corrective action alternatives and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each CAS. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable corrective action alternatives that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document. The sites will be investigated based on the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on February 10, 2009, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection; U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office; Stoller-Navarro Joint Venture; Desert Research Institute, and National Security Technologies, LLC. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAU 372.

Patrick Matthews

2009-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

174

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 263: Area 25 Building 4839 Leachfields, Nevada Test Site, Revision 0, DOE/NV--535 UPDATED WITH RECORD OF TECHNICAL CHANGE No.1  

SciTech Connect

The Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 263, the Area 25 Building 4839 Leachfield, has been developed in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order that was agreed to by the US Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office; the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection; and the US Department of Defense. Corrective Action Unit 263 is comprised of the Corrective Action Site 25-05-04 sanitary leachfield and associated collection system. This Corrective Action Investigation Plan is used in combination with the Work Plan for Leachfield Corrective Action Units: Nevada Test Site and Tonopah Test Range, Nevada (DOE/NV, 1998d). The Leachfield Work Plan was developed to streamline investigations at Leachfield Corrective Action Units by incorporating management, technical, quality assurance, health and safety, public involvement, field sampling, and waste management information common to a set of Corrective Action Units with similar site histories and characteristics into a single document that can be referenced. This Corrective Action Investigation Plan provides investigative details specific to Corrective Action Unit 263. Corrective Action Unit 263 is located southwest of Building 4839, in the Central Propellant Storage Area. Operations in Building 4839 from 1968 to 1996 resulted in effluent releases to the leachfield and associated collection system. In general, effluent released to the leachfield consisted of sanitary wastewater from a toilet, urinal, lavatory, and drinking fountain located within Building 4839. The subsurface soils in the vicinity of the collection system and leachfield may have been impacted by effluent containing contaminants of potential concern generated by support activities associated with the Building 4839 operations.

US DOE Nevada Operations Office

1999-04-12T23:59:59.000Z

175

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 214: Bunkers and Storage Areas Nevada Test Site, Nevada: Revision 0, Including Record of Technical Change No. 1 and No. 2  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan contains the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office's approach to collect the data necessary to evaluate corrective action alternatives appropriate for the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 214 under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Located in Areas 5, 11, and 25 of the Nevada Test Site, CAU 214 consists of nine Corrective Action Sites (CASs): 05-99-01, Fallout Shelters; 11-22-03, Drum; 25-99-12, Fly Ash Storage; 25-23-01, Contaminated Materials; 25-23-19, Radioactive Material Storage; 25-99-18, Storage Area; 25-34-03, Motor Dr/Gr Assembly (Bunker); 25-34-04, Motor Dr/Gr Assembly (Bunker); and 25-34-05, Motor Dr/Gr Assembly (Bunker). These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives (CAAs). The suspected contaminants and critical analyte s for CAU 214 include oil (total petroleum hydrocarbons-diesel-range organics [TPH-DRO], polychlorinated biphenyls [PCBs]), pesticides (chlordane, heptachlor, 4,4-DDT), barium, cadmium, chronium, lubricants (TPH-DRO, TPH-gasoline-range organics [GRO]), and fly ash (arsenic). The land-use zones where CAU 214 CASs are located dictate that future land uses will be limited to nonresidential (i.e., industrial) activities. The results of this field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable corrective action alternatives that will be presented in the corrective action decision document.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office

2003-05-16T23:59:59.000Z

176

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 367: Area 10 Sedan, Ess and Uncle Unit Craters Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit 367 is located in Area 10 of the Nevada Test Site, which is approximately 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. Corrective Action Unit 367 comprises the four corrective action sites (CASs) listed below: 10-45-01, U-10h Crater (Sedan) 10-45-02, Ess Crater Site 10-09-03, Mud Pit 10-45-03, Uncle Crater Site The CASs in CAU 367 are being investigated because hazardous and/or radioactive contaminants may be present in concentrations that exceed risk-based corrective action (RBCA) levels. Existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend CAAs for the CASs. Additional information will be generated by conducting a CAI before evaluating and selecting CAAs. The scope of the corrective action investigation for CAU 367 includes the following activities: Move surface debris and/or materials, as needed, to facilitate sampling. Conduct radiological surveys. Collect and submit environmental samples for laboratory analysis to determine the area where TED at the site exceeds FALs (i.e., corrective action boundary). Evaluate TED to potential receptors in areas along Mercury Highway that have been impacted by a release of radionuclides from the Sedan test. Collect and submit environmental samples for laboratory analysis related to the drilling mud within CAS 10-09-03, Mud Pit, and any encountered stains or waste as necessary to determine whether COCs are present. If COCs are present, collect additional step-out samples to define the extent of the contamination. Collect samples of investigation-derived waste, as needed, for waste management purposes.

Patrick Matthews

2009-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

177

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 106: Areas 5, 11 Frenchman Flat Atmospheric Sites, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit (CAU)106 is located in Area 5 of the Nevada Test Site, which is approximately 65miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. Corrective Action Unit 106 comprises the five corrective action sites (CASs) listed below: 05-23-02, GMX Alpha Contaminated Area 05-23-05, Atmospheric Test Site - Able 05-45-01, Atmospheric Test Site - Hamilton 05-45-04, 306 GZ Rad Contaminated Area 05-45-05, 307 GZ Rad Contaminated Area These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives (CAAs). Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation before evaluating CAAs and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each CAS. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable CAAs that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document. The sites will be investigated based on the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on January 19, 2010, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection and the U.S.Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAU106. The presence and nature of contamination at CAU 106 will be evaluated based on information collected from a field investigation. The CAU includes land areas impacted by the release of radionuclides from a weapons-effect tower test (CAS 05-45-01), a weapons-related airdrop test (CAS05-23-05), equation of state experiments (CAS 05-23-02), and unknown support activities at two sites (CAS 05-45-04 and CAS 05-45-05). Surface-deposited radiological contamination will be evaluated based on a comparison of the total effective dose (TED) at sample plot locations to the dose-based final action level. The TED will be calculated as the total of separate estimates of internal and external doses. Results from the analysis of soil samples collected from sample plots will be used to calculate internal radiological dose. Thermoluminescent dosimeters placed at the center of each sample plot will be used to measure external radiological dose. The presence and nature of contamination from other types of releases (such as migration and excavation as well as any potential releases discovered during the investigation) will be evaluated using soil samples collected from the locations most likely containing contamination, if present. AppendixA provides a detailed discussion of the DQO methodology and the DQOs specific to eachCAS. The scope of the corrective action investigation for CAU 106 includes the following activities: Conduct radiological surveys. Collect and submit environmental samples for laboratory analysis to determine internal doserates and the presence of contaminants of concern. If contaminants of concern are present, collect additional samples to define the extent of thecontamination and determine the area where TED at the site exceeds final action levels (i.e., corrective action boundary). Collect samples of investigation-derived waste, as needed, for waste management purposes.

Patrick Matthews

2010-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

178

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 104: Area 7 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

CAU 104 comprises the 15 CASs listed below: (1) 07-23-03, Atmospheric Test Site T-7C; (2) 07-23-04, Atmospheric Test Site T7-1; (3) 07-23-05, Atmospheric Test Site; (4) 07-23-06, Atmospheric Test Site T7-5a; (5) 07-23-07, Atmospheric Test Site - Dog (T-S); (6) 07-23-08, Atmospheric Test Site - Baker (T-S); (7) 07-23-09, Atmospheric Test Site - Charlie (T-S); (8) 07-23-10, Atmospheric Test Site - Dixie; (9) 07-23-11, Atmospheric Test Site - Dixie; (10) 07-23-12, Atmospheric Test Site - Charlie (Bus); (11) 07-23-13, Atmospheric Test Site - Baker (Buster); (12) 07-23-14, Atmospheric Test Site - Ruth; (13) 07-23-15, Atmospheric Test Site T7-4; (14) 07-23-16, Atmospheric Test Site B7-b; (15) 07-23-17, Atmospheric Test Site - Climax These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives (CAAs). Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation before evaluating CAAs and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each CAS. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable CAAs that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document. The sites will be investigated based on the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on April 28, 2011, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAU 104. The releases at CAU 104 consist of surface-deposited radionuclides from 30 atmospheric nuclear tests. The presence and nature of contamination at CAU 104 will be evaluated based on information collected from a field investigation. Radiological contamination will be evaluated based on a comparison of the total effective dose (TED) to the dose-based final action level (FAL). The presence of TED exceeding the FAL is considered a radiological contaminant of concern (COC). Anything identified as a COC will require corrective action. The TED will be calculated as the total of separate estimates of internal and external dose. Results from the analysis of soil samples will be used to calculate internal radiological dose. Thermoluminescent dosimeters will be used to measure external radiological dose. Based on process knowledge of the releases associated with the nuclear tests and radiological survey information about the location and shape of the resulting contamination plume, it was determined that the releases from the nuclear tests are co-located and will be investigated concurrently. A field investigation will be performed to define areas where TED exceeds the FAL and to determine whether other COCs are present at the site. The investigation will also collect information to determine the presence and nature of contamination associated with migration and excavation, as well as any potential releases discovered during the investigation. Appendix A provides a detailed discussion of the DQO methodology and the DQOs specific to each CAS.

Patrick Matthews

2011-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

179

Community Energy Strategic Planning Resources | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Resources Community Energy Strategic Planning Resources Presentation for the Community Energy Stategic Planning Resources webinar, presented on January 24, 2013 as part of the U.S....

180

PRESENTATION TITLE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Projects Impacting Federal Projects Impacting Federal Power Tulsa District Dan Brueggenjohann 12 June 2013 BUILDING STRONG ®  Interpretation/Application of CERM-F-2013-18  303(d) Listing of Broken Bow Tailwaters  Interior Least Tern Operations and Habitat Creation  Tulsa Vision 2025  Dam Safety Issues ► Keystone, Pine Creek, Robert S. Kerr, Denison  Lake Eufaula Advisory Committee  Tenkiller Downstream Fishery Issues  Broken Bow Seasonal Pool Update - Cultural Resources Impacts  Arkansas River Navigation Improvement  Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan Update BUILDING STRONG ® Interpretation/Application of CERM-F-2013-18  Situation - New Resource Management regulation to increase the capitalization threshold for power marketing agency assets.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "investigation planning presentation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Presentation Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

LLW Processing Update LLW Processing Update Aaron Staub Senior Engineer Waste Solidification Engineering Denver Technical Exchange May 19, 2009 LWO-WSE-2009-00135 Saltstone LLW Processing Update 2 Saltstone Facility: Background Commissioned in 1990 for waste treatment of site evaporator bottoms effluents and decontaminated salt solution from In-Tank Precipitation (ITP) processing. Original design allowed for significant contact maintenance, waste expected to have minimal radioactive source term. During 1990s and early 2000s, delays in salt processing eliminated much of the feed planned for Saltstone. Intermittent operations only to support evaporator effluents. By mid-2000s, Tank Farm space requirements create need to dispose of small volume of waste with higher Cs-137 levels than originally forecast.

182

PRESENTATION TITLE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Southwestern Regional Southwestern Regional Hydropower Conference Michael Biggs, PE Chief, Reservoir Control Section Hydraulics & Technical Services Branch Little Rock District 16 June 2011 BUILDING STRONG ® White River Operations BUILDING STRONG ® Typical River Basin BUILDING STRONG ® Typical Multi Purpose Project BUILDING STRONG ® Typical River Section BUILDING STRONG ® Typical Regulating Station BUILDING STRONG ® White River Basin and Projects BUILDING STRONG ® White River System  Operated as a SYSTEM of reservoirs ► Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork are a 4-lake subsystem ► Greers Ferry ► Clearwater  "Comprehensive" system of water control regulation ► encompasses the entire White River basin ► 1 water control plan  Operation of the system is VERY COMPLEX

183

MITG Test Plan  

SciTech Connect

The plan presented is for the testing of a prototypical slice of the Modular Isotopic Thermoelectric Generator (MITG). Cross Reference T48-1.

Eck, Marshall B.

1981-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

184

State Energy Strategic Planning  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Assistance Program (TAP) presentation at a TAP webinar held on April 3, 2013 and dealing with state energy strategic planning.

185

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 569: Area 3 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 569 is located in Area 3 of the Nevada National Security Site, which is approximately 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. Corrective Action Unit 569 comprises the nine numbered corrective action sites (CASs) and one newly identified site listed below: (1) 03-23-09, T-3 Contamination Area (hereafter referred to as Annie, Franklin, George, and Moth); (2) 03-23-10, T-3A Contamination Area (hereafter referred to as Harry and Hornet); (3) 03-23-11, T-3B Contamination Area (hereafter referred to as Fizeau); (4) 03-23-12, T-3S Contamination Area (hereafter referred to as Rio Arriba); (5) 03-23-13, T-3T Contamination Area (hereafter referred to as Catron); (6) 03-23-14, T-3V Contamination Area (hereafter referred to as Humboldt); (7) 03-23-15, S-3G Contamination Area (hereafter referred to as Coulomb-B); (8) 03-23-16, S-3H Contamination Area (hereafter referred to as Coulomb-A); (9) 03-23-21, Pike Contamination Area (hereafter referred to as Pike); and (10) Waste Consolidation Site 3A. Because CAU 569 is a complicated site containing many types of releases, it was agreed during the data quality objectives (DQO) process that these sites will be grouped. These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives (CAAs). Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation before evaluating CAAs and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each study group. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable CAAs that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document. The sites will be investigated based on the DQOs developed on September 26, 2011, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAU 569. The presence and nature of contamination at CAU 569 will be evaluated based on information collected from a field investigation. Radiological contamination will be evaluated based on a comparison of the total effective dose (TED) at sample locations to the dose-based final action level (FAL). The TED will be calculated as the total of separate estimates of internal and external dose. Results from the analysis of soil samples will be used to calculate internal radiological dose. Thermoluminescent dosimeters placed at the center of each sample location will be used to measure external radiological dose. A field investigation will be performed to define any areas where TED exceeds the FAL and to determine whether contaminants of concern are present at the site from other potential releases. The presence and nature of contamination from other types of releases (e.g., excavation, migration, and any potential releases discovered during the investigation) will be evaluated using soil samples collected from biased locations indicating the highest levels of contamination. Appendix A provides a detailed discussion of the DQO methodology and the objectives specific to each study group.

Patrick Matthews; Christy Sloop

2012-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

186

Addendum to Revision 1 of the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 98: Frenchman Flat, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (Addendum Revision No. 1)  

SciTech Connect

This document is submitted as an addendum to the Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 98: Frenchman Flat, Nevada Test Site (NTS), Nevada. The addendum was prepared to propose work activities in response to comments resulting from the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) review of the draft Frenchman Flat CAU model of groundwater flow and contaminant transport completed in April 1999. The reviewers included an external panel of experts and the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection. As a result of the review, additional work scope, including new data-collection and modeling activities, has been identified for the Frenchman Flat CAU. The proposed work scope described in this addendum will be conducted in accordance with the revised Underground Test Area strategy contained in the December 2000 amendment to the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. The Frenchman Flat CAU model is a group of interdependent models designed to predict the extent of contamination in groundwater due to the underground nuclear tests conducted within this CAU. At the time of the DOE review, the CAU model consisted of a CAU groundwater flow and transport model comprised of two major components: a groundwater flow model and a recharge model. The CAU groundwater flow model is supported by a hydrostratigraphic model and a recharge model, whereas the CAU transport model is supported by a source-term model. As part of the modeling activities proposed in this addendum, two new major components may be added to the Frenchman Flat CAU model: a total-system model and two local groundwater flow and transport models. The reviewers identified several issues relating to insufficiency of data and inadequacy of the modeling process that should be addressed to provide additional confidence in the modeling results with respect to the potential for contaminant migration to the Lower Carbonate Aquifer. The proposed additional work scope includes new data-collection activities, development and use of local-scale models of the two underground nuclear testing areas, and potential revisions of draft CAU groundwater flow and transport models. Upon completion of this work, an evaluation will be made by DOE to ensure that all issues have been resolved.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Operations Office

2001-06-06T23:59:59.000Z

187

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 561: Waste Disposal Areas, Nevada Test Site, Nevada with ROTC 1, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 561 is located in Areas 1, 2, 3, 5, 12, 22, 23, and 25 of the Nevada Test Site, which is approximately 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. Corrective Action Unit 561 is comprised of the 10 corrective action sites (CASs) listed below: 01-19-01, Waste Dump 02-08-02, Waste Dump and Burn Area 03-19-02, Debris Pile 05-62-01, Radioactive Gravel Pile 12-23-09, Radioactive Waste Dump 22-19-06, Buried Waste Disposal Site 23-21-04, Waste Disposal Trenches 25-08-02, Waste Dump 25-23-21, Radioactive Waste Dump 25-25-19, Hydrocarbon Stains and Trench These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives. Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation before evaluating corrective action alternatives and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each CAS. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable corrective action alternatives that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document. The sites will be investigated based on the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on April 28, 2008, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection; U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office; Stoller-Navarro Joint Venture; and National Security Technologies, LLC. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAU 561. Appendix A provides a detailed discussion of the DQO methodology and the DQOs specific to each CAS. The scope of the Corrective Action Investigation for CAU 561 includes the following activities: Move surface debris and/or materials, as needed, to facilitate sampling. Conduct radiological surveys. Perform exploratory excavations. Perform field screening. Collect and submit environmental samples for laboratory analysis to determine the nature and extent of any contamination released by each CAS. Collect samples of source material to determine the potential for a release. Collect samples of potential remediation wastes. Collect quality control samples.

Grant Evenson

2008-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

188

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 234: Mud Pits, Cellars, and Mud Spills, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit 234, Mud Pits, Cellars, and Mud Spills, consists of 12 inactive sites located in the north and northeast section of the NTS. The 12 CAU 234 sites consist of mud pits, mud spills, mud sumps, and an open post-test cellar. The CAU 234 sites were all used to support nuclear testing conducted in the Yucca Flat and Rainier Mesa areas during the 1950s through the 1970s. The CASs in CAU 234 are being investigated because hazardous and/or radioactive constituents may be present in concentrations that could potentially pose a threat to human health and the environment. Existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives for the CASs. Additional information will be generated by conducting a CAI before evaluating and selecting appropriate corrective action alternatives.

Grant Evenson

2007-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

189

PRESENTATION TITLE  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Hydroelectric Design Center "Leaders in Hydropower Engineering" 11 March 2013 Presentation for Southeastern Federal Power Alliance Steven R. Miles, PE, PMP Director, HDC BUILDING...

190

For Presentation  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

For Presentation at 7th Fluidization Conference CONF-920502--I f May 3,, 1992 DE92 002879 HYDRODYNAMICS OF CIRCULATING FLUIDIZED BEDS" KINETIC THEORY APPROACH by i Dimitri...

191

CESP Tool 0.2: Value Brief Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

CESP Tool 0.2: Value Brief Presentation from the Introduction to Community Energy Strategic Planning.

192

Presentation Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Overview for Newcomers R. Arnold, NV R. Pinney, NJ M. Wangler, DC N. Weber, NM National Transportation Stakeholders Forum 14 May 2013 www.energy.gov/EM 2 Orientation Format * Overview presentation by M. Wangler. * Experiential discussions by R. Arnold, R. Pinney and N. Weber. * Q & A by participants. www.energy.gov/EM 3 Overview Presentation Topics * History of External Coordination * Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC) * Background * Some founding principles * Historical issues * Performance goals * Key accomplishments of TEC * National Transportation Stakeholders Forum * Information sharing * Addressing issues and concerns * Working Groups * Continuing focus * 2013 NTSF Meeting * Newsletter www.energy.gov/EM 4 History * Forums existed for addressing issues with communities

193

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 5: Landfills, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (Rev. No.: 0) includes Record of Technical Change No. 1 (dated 9/17/2002)  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan contains the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Operations Office's approach to collect the data necessary to evaluate corrective action alternatives appropriate for the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 5 under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Corrective Action Unit 5 consists of eight Corrective Action Sites (CASs): 05-15-01, Sanitary Landfill; 05-16-01, Landfill; 06-08-01, Landfill; 06-15-02, Sanitary Landfill; 06-15-03, Sanitary Landfill; 12-15-01, Sanitary Landfill; 20-15-01, Landfill; 23-15-03, Disposal Site. Located between Areas 5, 6, 12, 20, and 23 of the Nevada Test Site (NTS), CAU 5 consists of unlined landfills used in support of disposal operations between 1952 and 1992. Large volumes of solid waste were produced from the projects which used the CAU 5 landfills. Waste disposed in these landfills may be present without appropriate controls (i.e., use restrictions, adequate cover) and hazardous and/or radioactive constituents may be present at concentrations and locations that could potentially pose a threat to human health and/or the environment. During the 1992 to 1995 time frame, the NTS was used for various research and development projects including nuclear weapons testing. Instead of managing solid waste at one or two disposal sites, the practice on the NTS was to dispose of solid waste in the vicinity of the project. A review of historical documentation, process knowledge, personal interviews, and inferred activities associated with this CAU identified the following as potential contaminants of concern: volatile organic compounds, semivolatile organic compounds, polychlorinated biphenyls, pesticides, petroleum hydrocarbons (diesel- and gasoline-range organics), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Metals, plus nickel and zinc. A two-phase approach has been selected to collect information and generate data to satisfy needed resolution criteria and resolve the decision statements. Phase I will concentrate on geophysical surveys to confirm the presence or absence of disposed waste within a CAS and verify the boundaries of disposal areas; penetrate disposal feature covers via excavation and/or drilling; perform geodetic surveys; and be used to collect both soil and environmental samples for laboratory analyses. Phase II will deal only with those CASs where a contaminant of concern has been identified. This phase will involve the collection of additional soil and/or environmental samples for laboratory analyses. The results of this field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of corrective action alternatives in the corrective action decision document.

IT Corporation, Las Vegas, NV

2002-05-28T23:59:59.000Z

194

Presentation Schedule  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Presentation Schedule Presentation Schedule (30 Min) Dave Wade - Dose Comparisons of once-thru and closed fuel cycles. (30 Min) Ralph Bennett - Roadmap Overview (15 Min) Neil Todreas - GRNS Perspectives and Recommendations (75 Min) Neil Todreas / - NERAC DISCUSSION Sal Levy 2 Generation IV Roadmap NERAC Subcommittee (GRNS) Bobby Abrams* Duke Engineering Douglas Chapin MPR Associates B. John Garrick Independent Consultant Dan Kammen University of California- Berkeley 3 Salomon Levy ** Levy & Associates Ted Marston Electrical Power Research Institute Bill Naughton Exelon Neil Todreas ** Massachusetts Institute of Technology * Resigned, July 2002 ** Co-chair GRNS Recruited Working Group Co-Chairs Jack Devine TWG-1 Water Cooled Phil Hildebrandt TWG-2 Gas Cooled Steve Rosen TWG-3 Metal Cooled Bill Rasin

195

PRESENTATION TITLE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PORTLAND DISTRICT PORTLAND DISTRICT 1 Corps of Engineers Hydro Optimization in the Pacific Northwest Presentation for: Southwestern Federal Hydropower Conference Kansas City, Missouri 16 June 2011 By Charlie Allen Hydroelectric Design Center US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® PORTLAND DISTRICT 2 PRESENTATION OUTLINE  HOT INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY  TYPE I (Unit) OPTIMIZATION ► Cam Curve Verification ► 3-D Cam Controllers ► Inputs and Telemetry ► Gate-Blade Optimizer  TYPE II (Powerhouse) OPTIMIZATION ► Economic Dispatch ► Unit Commitment ► Absolute Flow Measurement ► Benefits Summary  QUESTIONS BUILDING STRONG ® PORTLAND DISTRICT 3 Hydropower Optimization Team (HOT) HOT is joint effort between BPA, COE, and BOR to maximize use of available water for hydropower

196

ACQUISITION PLANNING  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

PLANNING Guiding Principles Sound acquisition planning ensures that the contracting process is conducted in a timely manner, in accordance with statutory, regulatory,...

197

STRATEGIC PLAN  

Energy Savers (EERE)

STRATEGIC PLAN 2015 - 2018 Message from the Associate Under Secretary for Environment, Health, Safety and Security I am proud to introduce this strategic plan for the Office of...

198

Presentation Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Mexico (PNM) - PV Plus Storage for Simultaneous Voltage Smoothing and Peak Shifting Steve Willard PE Principal Investigator November 3, 2010 Funded in part by the Energy Storage Systems Program of the U.S. Department Of Energy through National Energy Technology Laboratory PNM/DOE SGDP Battery + PV Objectives * Project will co-locate a 2 - 4 MWh Advanced Lead Acid battery with a separately installed 500kW solar PV plant at a utility-owned site to create a firm, dispatchable distributed generation resource. * The project will develop broadly applicable modeling tools. These tools are being developed and used during the project to optimize the battery-system control algorithms, and ultimately will help characterize and further the understanding of feeders with storage and distributed

199

Presentation title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Meeting Transmission Meeting Transmission Challenges in the Rocky Mountain Region Jeff Hein June 21, 2011 Western Renewable Energy Zones Composite photo created by NREL Presentation Outline * WREZ Vision * Chronology * WREZ Initiative Overview * Generation and Transmission Model * Lessons Learned * Future Activities National Renewable Energy Laboratory WREZ Vision * Western Governor's Association and U.S. Department of Energy initiated effort to develop renewable energy resources and reduce GHG emissions * Develop a high level "screening tool" to identify potential projects that allows industry stakeholders to analyze and compare economics of

200

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Department of Energy Transportation External Working Group (TEC) EDWARDS MOVING & RIGGING, INC. Heavy Transport Presentation Presented By What kind of projects do we do? Heavy Transport Heavy Rigging Focus today is Heavy Transport Focus today is Heavy Transport Turbine Generator Transformer Boilers Vessel Press Bridge Duct work Railroad Engine Tank Relocation 440T Building Solid Masonry Even a building facade "These guys can move anything" Pressurizer RA Movement of Hazardous Cargo Major Plant Components & Casks Cask Movement Shipment by Road Shipment by Road Shipment by Railroad Shipments by Barge What makes Transport Contactors Suited for these projects? Complete Package *Engineering *Planning *State-of-the-art-equipment

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "investigation planning presentation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Rail Topic Group Transportation External Coordination Rail Topic Group Rail Topic Group Transportation External Coordination Rail Topic Group Presented by: Presented by: Cort Richardson Council of State Governments- Eastern Regional Conference March 15 2006 March 15 2006 Washington, DC Washington, DC 2 Rail Topic Group Summary * Since the last TEC meeting in September, the approach of the Topic Group was to divide into subgroups to address activities important to the Topic Group as a whole * The subgroups are: - Inspections - Tracking and Radiation Monitoring - Planning - Lessons Learned - TRAGIS - Legal Weight Truck Shipments

202

Renewable Electricity Futures (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect

This presentation summarizes findings of NREL's Renewable Electricity Futures study, published in June 2012. RE Futures investigated the challenges and impacts of achieving very high renewable electricity generation levels in the contiguous United States by 2050. This presentation was presented in a Wind Powering America webinar on August 15, 2012 and is now available through the Wind Powering America website.

Mai, T.

2012-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

203

IDC Integrated Master Plan.  

SciTech Connect

This is the IDC Re-Engineering Phase 2 project Integrated Master Plan (IMP). The IMP presents the major accomplishments planned over time to re-engineer the IDC system. The IMP and the associate Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) are used for planning, scheduling, executing, and tracking the project technical work efforts. REVISIONS Version Date Author/Team Revision Description Authorized by V1.0 12/2014 IDC Re- engineering Project Team Initial delivery M. Harris

Clifford, David J.; Harris, James M.

2014-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

204

Roadmap Integration Team Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Presentation Presentation NP03-00 Slide 1 Generation IV Technology Roadmap NERAC Meeting: Washington, D.C. September 30, 2002 Roadmap Integration Team Presentation NP03-00 Slide 2 NERAC Meeting September 30, 2002 Generation IV Technology Roadmap * Identifies systems deployable by 2030 or earlier * Specifies six systems that offer significant advances towards: - Sustainability - Economics - Safety and reliability - Proliferation resistance and physical protection * Summarizes R&D activities and priorities for the systems * Lays the foundation for Generation IV R&D program plans Roadmap Integration Team Presentation NP03-00 Slide 3 NERAC Meeting September 30, 2002 The Technical Roadmap Report * Discusses the benefits, goals and challenges, and the importance of the fuel cycle * Describes evaluation and selection process

205

Renewable Electricity Futures (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect

This presentation library summarizes findings of NREL's Renewable Electricity Futures study, published in June 2012. RE Futures investigated the challenges and impacts of achieving very high renewable electricity generation levels in the contiguous United States by 2050.

Mai, T.

2012-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

206

Renewable Electricity Futures (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect

This presentation summarizes findings of NREL's Renewable Electricity Futures study, published in June 2012. RE Futures investigated the challenges and impacts of achieving very high renewable electricity generation levels in the contiguous United States by 2050.

Mai, T.

2012-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

207

Renewable Electricity Futures (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect

This presentation summarizes findings of NREL's Renewable Electricity Futures study, published in June 2012. RE Futures investigated the challenges and impacts of achieving very high renewable electricity generation levels in the contiguous United States by 2050.

Mai, T.

2013-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

208

Renewable Electricity Futures (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect

This presentation summarizes findings of NREL's Renewable Electricity Futures study, published in June 2012. RE Futures investigated the challenges and impacts of achieving very high renewable electricity generation levels in the contiguous United States by 2050.

Hand, M. M.

2012-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

209

NASA's Metering Plan | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers (EERE)

NASA's Metering Plan NASA's Metering Plan Presentation covers NASA's Meterting Plan and is given at the FUPWG 2006 Spring meeting, held on May 3-4, 2006 in Atlanta, Georgia....

210

Planning for an Energy Management System  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This presentation discusses the Planning step as part of an Energy Management System. Planning involves establishing your energy picture, defining the scope and boundary, setting an energy baseline, and developing action plans.

211

Performance Plans | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Performance Plans Performance Plans Performance Plans December 13, 2013 Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 Annual Performance Results and FYs 2014 and 2015 Annual Performance Plan Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 Annual Performance Results and FY 2014-15 Annual Performance Plan December 18, 2012 Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Annual Performance Results and FYs 2013 and 2014 Annual Performance Plan This report presents the goals, objectives, and strategies for measuring the OIG's FY 2012 actual performance and FYs 2013 and 2014 planned activities. November 28, 2011 Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 Annual Performance Results and FY 2012 Annual Performance Plan This report presents the goals, objectives, and strategies for measuring the OIG's FY 2011 actual performance and FY 2012 planned activities.

212

Characterization plan for the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Area-Wide Groundwater Program, Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

SciTech Connect

This characterization plan has been developed as part of the U.S. Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) investigation of the Groundwater Operable Unit (GWOU) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) located near Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The first iteration of the characterization plan is intended to serve as a strategy document to guide subsequent GWOU remedial investigations. The plan provides a rationale and organization for groundwater data acquisition, monitoring, and remedial actions to be performed during implementation of environmental restoration activities associated with the ORNL GWOU. It is important to note that the characterization plan for the ORNL GWOU is not a prototypical work plan. As such, remedial investigations will be conducted using annual work plans to manage the work activities, and task reports will be used to document the results of the investigations. Sampling and analysis results will be compiled and reported annually with a review of data relative to risk (screening level risk assessment review) for groundwater. This characterization plan outlines the overall strategy for the remedial investigations and defines tasks that are to be conducted during the initial phase of investigation. This plan is presented with the understanding that more specific addenda to the plan will follow.

Not Available

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

213

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

INDUSTRY DAY INDUSTRY DAY Emergency Operations Training Academy Support Services James (Jim) Cochran Headquarters Support Section Headquarters Acquisition Branch Business Services Division January 6, 2012 2 Agenda * 0900 - Arrival/Registration * 0915 - Opening Remarks - Jim Cochran, Contracting Officer * 0925 - Emergency Operations Training Academy's (EOTA) Overview - Paul Jenkins, Director, EOTA * 0950 - Review of EOTA Request for Proposals * 1030 -EOTA Server Facility * 1100 - Questions * 1130 - Closing Comments 3 Notice * Presentation is based upon current information and plan of action * Input may be considered * Request for Proposal is the only document that is to be relied upon in determining the Government's needs 4 Overview * Purpose of Industry Day

214

TITLE OF PRESENTATION HERE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Claiming Savings from Claiming Savings from Building Codes Activities Presented by Carolyn Sarno April 4, 2012 DOE Code Compliance Meeting FOR TODAY'S DISCUSSION * Background * Claimed Savings Report * Best Practice - Rhode Island 1 RECENT TRENDS 2 Aggressive new goals directing capture of all cost- effective efficiency * CT, MA, NY, RI VT * $2.5 billion committed to efficiency programs in New England, New York and Mid-Atlantic in 2012 * Multiple funding sources: SBC, RGGI, FCM, rate factors * Next generation of efficiency plans going broader & deeper ATTRIBUTING ENERGY CODE SAVINGS ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMS * Convene stakeholder advisory group * Identify issues related to PA support for codes (and standards) * Provide procedural guidance for

215

Renewable Electricity Futures (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect

This presentation library summarizes findings of NREL's Renewable Electricity Futures study, published in June 2012. RE Futures investigated the challenges and impacts of achieving very high renewable electricity generation levels in the contiguous United States by 2050. It is being presented at the Utility Variable-Generation Integration Group Fall Technical Workshop on October 24, 2012.

Hand, M.

2012-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

216

Renewable Electricity Futures (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect

This presentation summarizes findings of NREL's Renewable Electricity Futures study, published in June 2012. RE Futures investigated the challenges and impacts of achieving very high renewable electricity generation levels in the contiguous United States by 2050. It was presented in a Power Systems Engineering Research Center webinar on September 4, 2012.

Mai, T.

2012-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

217

Renewable Electricity Futures (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect

This presentation library summarizes findings of NREL's Renewable Electricity Futures study, published in June 2012. RE Futures investigated the challenges and impacts of achieving very high renewable electricity generation levels in the contiguous United States by 2050. It was presented in an Union of Concerned Scientists webinar on June 12, 2012.

Hand, M.; Mai, T.

2012-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

218

Renewable Electricity Futures (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect

This presentation library summarizes findings of NREL's Renewable Electricity Futures study, published in June 2012. RE Futures investigated the challenges and impacts of achieving very high renewable electricity generation levels in the contiguous United States by 2050. It was presented in a webinar given by the California Energy Commission.

Hand, M. M.

2012-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

219

Remedial investigation work plan for the Upper East Fork Poplar Creek characterization area, Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

SciTech Connect

The Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant, located within the Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR), is owned by the US Department of Energy (DOE) and managed by Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. The entire ORR was placed on the National Priorities List (NPL) of CERCLA sites in November 1989. Following CERCLA guidelines, sites under investigation require a remedial investigation (RI) to define the nature and extent of contamination, evaluate the risks to public health and the environment, and determine the goals for a feasibility study (FS) of potential remedial actions. The need to complete RIs in a timely manner resulted in the establishment of the Upper East Fork Poplar Creek (UEFPC) Characterization Area (CA) and the Bear Creek CA. The CA approach considers the entire watershed and examines all appropriate media within it. The UEFPC CA, which includes the main Y-12 Plant area, is an operationally and hydrogeologically complex area that contains numerous contaminants and containment sources, as well as ongoing industrial and defense-related activities. The UEFPC CA also is the suspected point of origin for off-site groundwater and surface-water contamination. The UEFPC CA RI also will address a carbon-tetrachloride/chloroform-dominated groundwater plume that extends east of the DOE property line into Union Valley, which appears to be connected with springs in the valley. In addition, surface water in UEFPC to the Lower East Fork Poplar Creek CA boundary will be addressed. Through investigation of the entire watershed as one ``site,`` data gaps and contaminated areas will be identified and prioritized more efficiently than through separate investigations of many discrete units.

NONE

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

220

10-Yr. Transmission Plan  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Power Marketing Rates Power Marketing Rates 10-Yr Transmission Plan 2012 Customer Meeting Announcement Agenda 120611 CRSP South Projects CRSP South PowerPoint Presentation CRSP South 2009-2011 Capitalized Execution CRSP North Projects CRSP North PowerPoint Presentation CRSP North 2009-2011 Capitalized Execution About Power Marketing Transmission Newsroom Business Policies Products Plan contents OASIS News features Careers No FEAR act Organization chart Plan processes Functions News releases Doing business Privacy policy History General power contract provisions OATT Revisions Fact sheets Energy Services Accessibility Financial information Rates and Repayment Interconnection Publications EPTC Adobe PDF Power projects EPAMP Infrastructure projects Federal Register Notices

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "investigation planning presentation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Carlsbad Area Office strategic plan  

SciTech Connect

This edition of the Carlsbad Area Office Strategic Plan captures the U.S. Department of Energy`s new focus, and supercedes the edition issued previously in 1995. This revision reflects a revised strategy designed to demonstrate compliance with environmental regulations earlier than the previous course of action; and a focus on the selected combination of scientific investigations, engineered alternatives, and waste acceptance criteria for supporting the compliance applications. An overview of operations and historical aspects of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant near Carlsbad, New Mexico is presented.

NONE

1995-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

222

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Presentation Presentation * CAES Aquifer Technology * Geological Framework of Iowa * Dallas Center Structure * Results of CAES Feasibility Simulation * ISEP CAES Development Plan How Does CAES Work? CAES Turbo-Machinery Operating Requirements Equipment Manufacturer Plant Size (MW) Min. Inlet Pressure (psi) Min. Flow Rate (lbs/MW/hr) Total Min. Flow Rate (lb/hr) Allison 15 200 9500 142,500 MAN Turbo 50 50 9500 475,000 Dresser Rand 134 830 9500 1,273,000 Alston 300 900 9500 2,850,000 Westinghouse (501D5) 350 750 9500 3,325,000 Westinghouse (501F) 450 750 9500 3,275,000 Earth Storage System Designs All based on the concept of multiple geologic and hydrologic barriers. DESIGN CRITERIA * Capacity: 5 to 10 BCF Total Vessel Volume * Integrity of Vessel: <4% of Volume over a year * Fluid Deliverability - 400#/sec = 464 MMscfd

223

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Projects Projects Characterization of Most Promising Carbon Capture and Sequestration Formations in the Central Rocky Mountain Region (RMCCS) RCSP Annual Review Meeting October 5-7, 2010 Pittsburgh, PA Acknowledgements I * Many thanks to the U.S. Department of Energy and NETL for supporting this project * We express our gratitude also to our many industry partners, who have committed a great deal of time, funding and other general support for this project * The work presented today is co-authored by many partners in the RMCCS project * Project Team (Who) * Major Goals (Why) * Work Plan (How) * Progress to Date (What) Presentation Outline Partners The project team consists of the geological surveys in each state of the region, some invaluable industry partners, and of course NETL.

224

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 165: Areas 25 and 26 Dry Well and Washdown Areas, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (including Record of Technical Change Nos. 1, 2, and 3) (January 2002, Rev. 0)  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan contains the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Operations Office's approach to collect the data necessary to evaluate corrective action alternatives appropriate for the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 165 under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Corrective Action Unit 165 consists of eight Corrective Action Sites (CASs): CAS 25-20-01, Lab Drain Dry Well; CAS 25-51-02, Dry Well; CAS 25-59-01, Septic System; CAS 26-59-01, Septic System; CAS 25-07-06, Train Decontamination Area; CAS 25-07-07, Vehicle Washdown; CAS 26-07-01, Vehicle Washdown Station; and CAS 25-47-01, Reservoir and French Drain. All eight CASs are located in the Nevada Test Site, Nevada. Six of these CASs are located in Area 25 facilities and two CASs are located in Area 26 facilities. The eight CASs at CAU 165 consist of dry wells, septic systems, decontamination pads, and a reservoir. The six CASs in Area 25 are associated with the Nuclear Rocket Development Station that operated from 1958 to 1973. The two CASs in Area 26 are associated with facilities constructed for Project Pluto, a series of nuclear reactor tests conducted between 1961 to 1964 to develop a nuclear-powered ramjet engine. Based on site history, the scope of this plan will be a two-phased approach to investigate the possible presence of hazardous and/or radioactive constituents at concentrations that could potentially pose a threat to human health and the environment. The Phase I analytical program for most CASs will include volatile organic compounds, semivolatile organic compounds, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act metals, total petroleum hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyls, and radionuclides. If laboratory data obtained from the Phase I investigation indicates the presence of contaminants of concern, the process will continue with a Phase II investigation to define the extent of contamination. Based on the results of Phase I sampling, the analytical program for Phase II investigation may be reduced. The results of this field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of corrective action alternatives in the corrective action decision document.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Operations Office (NNSA/NV)

2002-01-09T23:59:59.000Z

225

2030 Transportation and Mobility Plan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

sections are as follows: 1. Introduction 2. Bi-State MPO Area Description 3. Planning Horizon Description and Data Projections 4. Long Range Plan Presentation 5. Plan Implementation and Monitoring Procedures 6. Bi-State MPO 2030 Transportation..., improved access at the Leigh Avenue/I-540 interchange, and the deployment of appropriate Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) projects. The Airport Master Plan Update has estimated a total airport improvement cost of $ 74,170,000 over a Three (3...

Bi-State Metropolitan Planning Organization

2006-08-11T23:59:59.000Z

226

Remedial Investigation Work Plan for Chestnut Ridge Operable Unit 1 (Chestnut Ridge Security Pits) at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

SciTech Connect

This document outlines the activities necessary to conduct a Remedial Investigation (RI) of the Chestnut Ridge Security Pits (CRSP) at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant. The CRSP, also designated Chestnut Ridge Operable Unit (OU) 1, is one of four OUs along Chestnut Ridge on the Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR). The purpose of the RI is to collect data to (1) evaluate the nature and extent of known and suspected contaminants, (2) support an Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) and a Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA), (3) support the feasibility study in the development and analysis of remedial alternatives, and (4) ultimately, develop a Record of Decision (ROD) for the site. This chapter summarizes the regulatory background of environmental investigation on the ORR and the approach currently being followed and provides an overview of the RI to be conducted at the CRSP. Subsequent chapters provide details on site history, sampling activities, procedures and methods, quality assurance (QA), health and safety, and waste management related to the RI.

Not Available

1994-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

227

National Grid Energy Efficiency Plans  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation covers the National Grid Energy Efficiency plans and is given at the Spring 2010 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meeting in Providence, Rhode Island.

228

Renewable Electricity Futures (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect

This presentation library summarizes findings of NREL's Renewable Electricity Futures study, published in June 2012. RE Futures investigated the challenges and impacts of achieving very high renewable electricity generation levels in the contiguous United States by 2050. It was presented to the 2012 Western Conference of Public Service Commissioners, during their June, 2012, meeting. The Western Conference of Public Service Commissioners is a regional association within the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC).

Hand, M. M.

2012-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

229

Task Plans  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Task Plans Task Plans This page contains links to a tentative listing of active and closed TEC Task Plans. Final status of these task plans will be determined after the July 2000 TEC meeting. Task Plan Number/Title DOE Lead Staff Last Update Comment Status/ New No. After 7/27/00 GP-1, Section 180(c) Coordination (begun 1/96) C. Macaluso 7/98 DOE published a Revised Proposed Policy and Procedures in April 1998; no final policy will be issued until a definitive date for NWPA shipments is determined, based on site suitability or other legislative direction. To the extent that any issues related to Section 180(c) arise in TEC meetings, they are being discussed in the context of the consolidated grant topic group which is covered by another task plan. Closed

230

NREL Battery Thermal and Life Test Facility (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect

This presentation describes NREL's Battery Thermal Test Facility and identifies test requirements and equipment and planned upgrades to the facility.

Keyser, M.

2011-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

231

Fast Ignition Program Presented at  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Laser drive Direct Laser drive #12;Fast Ignition may allow longer wavelength laser implosion systemsFast Ignition Program Presented at FESAC Development Path Panel General Atomics January 14, 2003 E. Michael Campbell ·Promise ·Status ·Challenges ·Implementation ·Plan #12;The original FI concept uses laser

232

Planning Based Integration of Web Services  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

In this paper a planning system for goal directed integration of web services is presented. The presented model extends classical planning to manage some forms of non determinism in service execution and to manage collections of objects. The dynamical ...

Alfredo Milani; Fabio Rossi; Simonetta Pallottelli

2006-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

233

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 campaign statistics 1 campaign statistics and plans presented by R. Granetz Alcator C-Mod quarterly review 2011/05/05 C-Mod FY2011 operation * Budgeted for 15 research run weeks (60 run days) * 14.5 research run weeks have been completed to date * 1719 plasma discharges (I p > 0.1 MA and τ pulse > 0.1 s) > 90% plasma initiation success rate * 54 different miniproposals have received run time so far, with emphasis on: * pedestal studies (FY2011 joint facility research topic, J Hughes) * characterization and optimization of I-mode (E. Marmar) * lower hybrid density limit (G. Wallace) * rotation reversal (J. Rice) * 30 full or half run days led by grad students (i.e. session leaders) 2/5 C-Mod FY2011 operation, cont. * 10 PhD students obtained the bulk of their thesis data and/or completed their research

234

Community Energy Strategic Planning- Step 4  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This presentation provides Step 4 to the Community Energy Strategic Planning approach, Assess the Current Energy Profile.

235

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 97: Yucca Flat/Climax Mine, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada with ROTCs 1, 2, and 3 (Revision 0, September 2000)  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan contains the U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office's (DOE/NV's) approach to collect the data necessary to evaluate Corrective Action Alternatives (CAAs) appropriate for the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 97 under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO). Corrective Action Unit 97, collectively known as the Yucca Flat/Climax Mine CAU, consists of 720 Corrective Action Sites (CASs). The Yucca Flat/Climax Mine CAU extends over several areas of the NTS and constitutes one of several areas used for underground nuclear testing in the past. The nuclear tests resulted in groundwater contamination in the vicinity as well as downgradient of the underground test areas. Based on site history, the Yucca Flat underground nuclear tests were conducted in alluvial, volcanic, and carbonate rocks; whereas, the Climax Mine tests were conducted in an igneous intrusion located in northern Yucca Flat. Particle-tracking simulations performed during the regional evaluation indicate that the local Climax Mine groundwater flow system merges into the much larger Yucca Flat groundwater flow systems during the 1,000-year time period of interest. Addressing these two areas jointly and simultaneously investigating them as a combined CAU has been determined the best way to proceed with corrective action investigation (CAI) activities. The purpose and scope of the CAI includes characterization activities and model development conducted in five major sequential steps designed to be consistent with FFACO Underground Test Area Project's strategy to predict the location of the contaminant boundary, develop and implement a corrective action, and close each CAU. The results of this field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of CAAs in the subsequent corrective action decision document.

Andrews, Robert; Marutzky, Sam

2000-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

236

PROJECT MANGEMENT PLAN EXAMPLES  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Baselines - Baselines - Performance Baseline Examples Example 34 6.0 PROJECT BASELINE This section presents a summary of the PFP Stabilization and Deactivation Project baseline, which was prepared by an inter- contractor team to support an accelerated planning case for the project. The project schedules and associated cost profiles presented in this section are compared to the currently approved project baseline, as contained in the Facility Stabilization Project Fiscal Year 1999 Multi-Year Work Plan (MYWP) for WBS 1.4 (FDH 1998). These cost and schedule details will provide the basis for a baseline change request that will be processed to revise the MYWP, consistent with the accelerated project plan presented below. 6.1 Project Baseline Overview This section of the IPMP presents the PFP baseline cost and schedule summary. The currently approved PFP Stabilization and

237

Corrective action investigation plan for Corrective Action Unit 143: Area 25 contaminated waste dumps, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 1 (with Record of Technical Change No. 1 and 2)  

SciTech Connect

This plan contains the US Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office's approach to collect the data necessary to evaluate correction action alternatives appropriate for the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 143 under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Corrective Action Unit 143 consists of two waste dumps used for the disposal of solid radioactive wastes. Contaminated Waste Dump No.1 (CAS 25-23-09) was used for wastes generated at the Reactor Maintenance Assembly and Disassembly (R-MAD) Facility and Contaminated Waste Dump No.2 (CAS 25-23-03) was used for wastes generated at the Engine Maintenance Assembly and Disassembly (E-MAD) Facility. Both the R-MAD and E-MAD facilities are located in Area 25 of the Nevada Test Site. Based on site history, radionuclides are the primary constituent of concern and are located in these disposal areas; vertical and lateral migration of the radionuclides is unlikely; and if migration has occurred it will be limited to the soil beneath the Contaminated Waste Disposal Dumps. The proposed investigation will involve a combination of Cone Penetrometer Testing within and near the solid waste disposal dumps, field analysis for radionuclides and volatile organic compounds, as well as sample collection from the waste dumps and surrounding areas for off-site chemical, radiological, and geotechnical analyses. The results of this field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of corrective action alternatives in the corrective action decision document.

USDOE Nevada Operations Office (DOE/NV)

1999-06-28T23:59:59.000Z

238

Data Management Plan (outline) The Data Management Plan (DMP) for a proposal is a two-page document that  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Data Management Plan (outline) The Data Management Plan (DMP to the funder's Data Policy and (2) how the investigator plans to manage the data should cover the following topics: 1. Information about the data · Describe

239

ICDF Complex Remedial Action Work Plan  

SciTech Connect

This Remedial Action Work Plan provides the framework for operation of the Idaho Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Disposal Facility Complex (ICDF). This facility includes (a) an engineered landfill that meets the substantial requirements of DOE Order 435.1, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Subtitle C, Idaho Hazardous Waste Management Act, and Toxic Substances Control Act polychlorinated biphenyl landfill requirements; (b) centralized receiving, inspections, administration, storage/staging, and treatment facilities necessary for CERCLA investigation-derived, remedial, and removal waste at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) prior to final disposition in the disposal facility or shipment off-Site; and (c) an evaporation pond that has been designated as a corrective action management unit. The ICDF Complex, including a buffer zone, will cover approximately 40 acres, with a landfill disposal capacity of approximately 510,000 yd3. The ICDF Complex is designed and authorized to accept INL CERCLA-generated wastes, and includes the necessary subsystems and support facilities to provide a complete waste management system. This Remedial Action Work Plan presents the operational approach and requirements for the various components that are part of the ICDF Complex. Summaries of the remedial action work elements are presented herein, with supporting information and documents provided as appendixes to this work plan that contain specific detail about the operation of the ICDF Complex. This document presents the planned operational process based upon an evaluation of the remedial action requirements set forth in the Operable Unit 3-13 Final Record of Decision.

W. M. Heileson

2006-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

240

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 230: Area 22 Sewage Lagoons and Corrective Action Unit 320: Area 22 Desert Rock Air port Strainer Box, Nevada Test Site, Nevada  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan contains the US Department of Energy, Nevada Operation Office's approach to collect the data necessary to evaluate corrective action alternatives appropriate for the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 230/320 under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Corrective Action Unit 230 consists of Corrective Action Site (CAS) 22-03-01, Sewage Lagoon; while CAU 320 consists of CAS 22-99-01, Strainer Box. These CAUs are referred to as CAU 230/320 or the Sewage Lagoons Site. The Sewage Lagoons Site also includes an Imhoff tank, sludge bed, and associated buried sewer piping. Located in Area 22, the site was used between 1951 to 1958 for disposal of sanitary sewage effluent from the historic Camp Desert Rock Facility at the Nevada Test Site in Nevada. Based on site history, the contaminants of potential concern include volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semivolatile organic compounds, total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), and radionuclides. Vertical migration is estimated to be less than 12 feet below ground surface, and lateral migration is limited to the soil immediately adjacent to or within areas of concern. The proposed investigation will involve a combination of field screening for VOCs and TPH using the direct-push method and excavation using a backhoe to gather soil samples for analysis. Gamma spectroscopy will also be conducted for waste management purposes. Sampling locations will be biased to suspected worst-case areas including the nearby sludge bed, sewage lagoon inlet(s) and outlet(s), disturbed soil surrounding the lagoons, surface drainage channel south of the lagoons, and the area near the Imhoff tank. The results of this field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of corrective action alternatives in the corrective action decision document.

U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office

1999-06-10T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "investigation planning presentation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 230: Area 22 Sewage Lagoons and Corrective Action Unit 320: Area 22 Desert Rock Airport Strainer Box, Nevada Test Site, Nevada  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan contains the U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operation Office's approach to collect the data necessary to evaluate corrective action alternatives appropriate for the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 230/320 under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Corrective Action Unit 230 consists of Corrective Action Site (CAS) 22-03-01, Sewage Lagoon; while CAU 320 consists of CAS 22-99-01, Strainer Box. These CAUs are referred to as CAU 230/320 or the Sewage Lagoons Site. The Sewage Lagoons Site also includes an Imhoff tank, sludge bed, and associated buried sewer piping. Located in Area 22, the site was used between 1951 to 1958 for disposal of sanitary sewage effluent from the historic Camp Desert Rock Facility at the Nevada Test Site in Nevada. Based on site history, the contaminants of potential concern include volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semivolatile organic compounds, total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), and radionuclides. Vertical migration is estimated to be less than 12 feet below ground surface, and lateral migration is limited to the soil immediately adjacent to or within areas of concern. The proposed investigation will involve a combination of field screening for VOCs and TPH using the direct-push method and excavation using a backhoe to gather soil samples for analysis. Gamma spectroscopy will also be conducted for waste management purposes. Sampling locations will be biased to suspected worst-case areas including the nearby sludge bed, sewage lagoon inlet(s) and outlet(s), disturbed soil surrounding the lagoons, surface drainage channel south of the lagoons, and the area near the Imhoff tank. The results of this field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of corrective action alternatives in the corrective action decision document.

US DOE/Nevada Operations Office

1999-06-10T23:59:59.000Z

242

Renewable Electricity Futures (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect

This presentation library summarizes findings of NREL's Renewable Electricity Futures study, published in June 2012. RE Futures investigated the challenges and impacts of achieving very high renewable electricity generation levels in the contiguous United States by 2050. It was presented at the 2012 RE AMP Annual Meeting. RE-AMP is an active network of 144 nonprofits and foundations across eight Midwestern states working on climate change and energy policy with the goal of reducing global warming pollution economy-wide 80% by 2050.

Mai, T.

2012-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

243

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review of Task Plan and Topic Group responsibilities * Discussion of potential topics for future Topic Group tasks - Inspections - FRA SCOP - Escorts - Tracking - Dedicated trains...

244

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy Savers (EERE)

organized? Inputs What is available? Examples * Response teams * Plans * Aid agreements * Smart-grid tech 14 Capacities Capabilities Inputs Resilience metrics are used for many...

245

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Development Division Hurtis Hodges, Director Construction Management Gerald Palau Project Management Jack Stellern Design Warren Thomas Project Planning and Analysis Gerald Scott...

246

The planning of site investigations for highways  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...dug trialpits. These are dug using an hydraulic back-hoe excavator, preferably mounted...folded down the rig converts to a simple trailer which can be towed by a Land Rover...strata. This type of rig may have an hydraulic power take-off which can be employed...

Thomas Roy Maylor Wakeling

247

CORPORATE AND STRATEGIC PLANNING Faculty planning workbook  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

.............................................................................33 Staffing & workforce planningCORPORATE AND STRATEGIC PLANNING Faculty planning workbook Humanities, Law & Social Studies Outcomes from 2008/09 Confirmation of progress during 2009/10 Faculty planning for 2010/11 ­ 2012/13 #12

248

Proactive Planning  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, rainwater harvesting, stream bank stabilization, and educational programs to prevent urban and agricultural nonpoint source pollution. Project leaders plan to have the Cedar Creek Watershed Protection Plan finalized by the summer of 2008. ?We... on watershed management, stream restoration practices, agricultural best man- agement practices, rainwater harvesting, non- point source pollution control, on-site septic system maintenance, and other water quality issues facing urban and rural...

Wythe, Kathy

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

249

GEOL 5303 Project Presentations Presenter name: ______________________________________________  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

GEOL 5303 Project Presentations Presenter name: ______________________________________________ Project title: ___________________________________________________________ Project content Superb Effective Weak Absent Introduction: What is your project topic? Presenter provides a clear introduction

Smith-Konter, Bridget

250

Intermediate Ethanol Blends: Plans and Status | Department of...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Intermediate Ethanol Blends: Plans and Status Intermediate Ethanol Blends: Plans and Status Presentation from the U.S. DOE Office of Vehicle Technologies "Mega" Merit Review 2008...

251

National Action Plan on Demand Response | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Action Plan on Demand Response National Action Plan on Demand Response Presentation-given at the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) Fall 2008...

252

Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation Planning Project (NFST...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation Planning Project (NFST) Program Status Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation Planning Project (NFST) Program Status Presentation made by...

253

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Status and Plans - 2010 | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Status and Plans - 2010 Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Status and Plans - 2010 Overview of WIPP presented by Dr. Dave Moody. Waste Isolation Pilot Plant...

254

CFN Ops Plan | Work Planning  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Operations Plan Operations Plan Work Planning & Control for Experiments and Operations All experimental work will be conducted in accordance with Work Planning and Control for Experiments and Operations, which ensures proper design and operation of all experiments prior to their commencement. CFN will use the SBMS provided standard form for the formal documentation. The Lead Experimenter/Responsible person will notify the Experimental Safety Review Committee of any new experiments or modifications to existing experiments. CFN will appoint an Experimental Safety Review Committee. This committee will consist of the Experiment Review Coordinator, CFN personnel, Facility Support Representative (FSR), Environmental Compliance Representative (ECR). Additional subject matter experts may be appointed on an ad-hoc

255

PowerPoint Presentation  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

William Gausman William Gausman Sr. Vice President Asset Management & Planning DOE Energy Information Administration Washington, DC April 7, 2010 PHI's Smart Grid Vision and Investment Grant Awards 1 Presentation Overview * PHI Company overview * PHI's Smart Grid Vision * SGIG Awards - Scope, Costs, Benefits and Schedules * Distribution Automation * Key Next Steps 2 Combined Service Territory Transmission & Distribution Competitive Energy / Other Who is Pepco Holdings, Inc. PHI Investments 2 Regulated transmission and distribution is PHI's core business. 3 Business Overview Gas Customers ►778,000 ►498,000 ►123,000 ►547,000 GWh ►26,549 ►12,494 ► N/A ►9,659 Mcf (000's) ► N/A ► N/A ►19,044 ► N/A Service Area ►640 ►5,000 ►275 ►2,700 (square miles)

256

National Action Plan on Demand Response  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Action Plan on Demand National Action Plan on Demand Action Plan on Demand National Action Plan on Demand Response Response Federal Utilities Partnership Working Group Federal Utilities Partnership Working Group November 18, 2008 November 18, 2008 Daniel Gore Daniel Gore Office of Energy Market Regulation Office of Energy Market Regulation Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The author's views do not necessarily represent the views of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Presentation Contents Presentation Contents Statutory Requirements Statutory Requirements National Assessment [Study] of Demand Response National Assessment [Study] of Demand Response National Action Plan on Demand Response National Action Plan on Demand Response General Discussion on Demand Response and Energy Outlook

257

Meeting and Presentation Materials  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MEETING MEETING Knoxville, Tennessee August 27-28, 2009 Key Workshop Objectives: 1. Provide Board Members a Summary of Actions Accomplished since the last Corporate Board Meeting in March 2009. 2. Review and Discuss the EM/EFCOG Quality Assurance Improvement Project Action Plan Focus Areas' Progress and Completed Deliverables. 3. Obtain industry and DOE perspectives on concerns and lessons learned pertaining to Counterfeit, Suspect, and Fraudulent Items and Commercial Grade Dedication. Desired Outcomes: 1. Vote by Board members on EM/EFCOG Quality Assurance Improvement Initiative Project Plan Deliverables for FY 2009. 2. Develop EM/EFCOG QA Improvement Project Plan Work Scope for FY 2010.

258

2014 DOE Climate Change Adaptation Plan | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

2014 DOE Climate Change Adaptation Plan 2014 DOE Climate Change Adaptation Plan Document presents the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 2014 plan for adapting to climate change....

259

PROJECT MANGEMENT PLAN EXAMPLES Project Management Plan Examples  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Management Plan Examples Management Plan Examples The following material has been extracted from several project management plans. The order in which it is presented is arbitrary. The elements table below should be used to navigate to the subject of interest. Elements of Deactivation Project Planning Deactivation Project Key Planning Elements Reference DOE O 430.1A Reference DOE G 430.1-3 DOE G 430.1- 3 Fig. 1 Link to Examples Policy & Operational Decisions, Assumptions and Strategies Includes organizational responsibilities and structure, disposition path, future use of facility, S&S Reqs and plan, hazard elimination or mitigation, NEPA, RCRA, CERCLA, HVAC/lighting service reqs, structural integrity reqs, etc. Sect. 6.e.7.a Sect. 4.1.1 Step 1 1. Example 1

260

Poster Presentations 1 Poster Presentation Basics  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Basics Poster Presentations 1 Poster Presentation Basics #12;Poster presentations involve two things Poster Presentation Basics2 Creating an effective poster The oral presentation you do standing by your poster #12;Effective posters A poster should convey the basic, most crucial points of your work

Texas at Arlington, University of

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "investigation planning presentation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

ACQUISITION PLANNING  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Chapter 7.1 (May 2012 second revision) Chapter 7.1 (May 2012 second revision) 2 ACQUISITION PLANNING REFERENCES 1. FAR 4.803(a)(1) Contents of Contract Files 2. FAR 5.405(a) Exchange of Acquisition Information 3. FAR Part 7 Acquisition Planning 4. FAR Part 8 Required Sources of Supply 5. FAR Part 10 Market Research 6. FAR 11.402 Factors to Consider in Establishing Schedules 7. FAR 15.201(c) Exchanges with Industry Before Receipt of Proposals 8. FAR Subpart 16.1 Selecting Contract Types 9. FAR 16.504(c) Indefinite-Quantity Contracts - Multiple Award Preference 10. FAR 17.5 Interagency Acquisitions 11. FAR Subpart 17.6 Management and Operating Contracts 12. FAR Part 19 Small Business Programs Guiding Principles  Sound acquisition planning ensures that the contracting process is

262

ACQUISITION PLANNING  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

-Chapter 7.1 (May 2012) -Chapter 7.1 (May 2012) 2 ACQUISITION PLANNING REFERENCES 1. FAR 4.803(a)(1) Contents of Contract Files 2. FAR 5.405(a) Exchange of Acquisition Information 3. FAR Part 7 Acquisition Planning 4. FAR Part 8 Required Sources of Supply 5. FAR Part 10 Market Research 6. FAR 11.402 Factors to Consider in Establishing Schedules 7. FAR 15.201(c) Exchanges with Industry Before Receipt of Proposals 8. FAR Subpart 16.1 Selecting Contract Types 9. FAR 16.504(c) Indefinite-Quantity Contracts - Multiple Award Preference 10. FAR 17.5 Interagency Acquisitions 11. FAR Subpart 17.6 Management and Operating Contracts 12. FAR Part 19 Small Business Programs Guiding Principles  Sound acquisition planning ensures that the contracting process is

263

ACQUISITION PLANNING  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 2011) January 2011) 2 ACQUISITION PLANNING REFERENCES 1. FAR 4.803(a)(1) Contents of Contract Files 2. FAR 5.405(a) Exchange of Acquisition Information 3. FAR Part 7 Acquisition Planning 4. FAR Part 8 Required Sources of Supply 5. FAR Part 10 Market Research 6. FAR 11.402 Factors to Consider in Establishing Schedules 7. FAR 15.201(c) Exchanges with Industry Before Receipt of Proposals 8. FAR Subpart 16.1 Selecting Contract Types 9. FAR 16.504(c) Indefinite-Quantity Contracts - Multiple Award Preference 10. FAR Subpart 17.6 Management and Operating Contracts 11. FAR Part 19 Small Business Programs 12. FAR 25.802(a)(2) Other International Agreements and Coordination Guiding Principles  Sound acquisition planning ensures that the contracting process is

264

ACQUISITION PLANNING  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OCTOBER 2010) OCTOBER 2010) 2 ACQUISITION PLANNING REFERENCES 1. FAR 4.803(a)(1) Contents of Contract Files 2. FAR 5.405(a) Exchange of Acquisition Information 3. FAR Part 7 Acquisition Planning 4. FAR Part 8 Required Sources of Supply 5. FAR Part 10 Market Research 6. FAR 11.402 Factors to Consider in Establishing Schedules 7. FAR 15.201(c) Exchanges with Industry Before Receipt of Proposals 8. FAR Subpart 16.1 Selecting Contract Types 9. FAR 16.504(c) Indefinite-Quantity Contracts - Multiple Award Preference 10. FAR Subpart 17.6 Management and Operating Contracts 11. FAR Part 19 Small Business Programs 12. FAR 25.802(a)(2) Other International Agreements and Coordination Guiding Principles  Sound acquisition planning ensures that the contracting process is

265

ACQUISITION PLANNING  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PLANNING PLANNING REFERENCES 1. FAR 4.803(a)(1) Contents of Contract Files 2. FAR 5.405(a) Exchange of Acquisition Information 3. FAR Part 6 Competition Requirements 4. FAR Part 7 Acquisition Planning 5. FAR Part 8 Required Sources of Supply 6. FAR Part 9 Contractor Qualifications 7. FAR Part 10 Market Research 8. FAR Part 11 Describing Agency Needs 9. FAR 15.201(c) Exchanges with Industry Before Receipt of Proposals 10. FAR Subpart 16.1 Selecting Contract Types 11. FAR 16.504(c) Indefinite-Quantity Contracts - Multiple Award Preference 12. FAR 17 Special Contracting Methods 13. FAR Part 19 Small Business Programs 14. FAR 25.802(a)(2) Other International Agreements and Coordination 15. FAR 34.004 Acquisition Strategy

266

Poster Resources Poster Planning  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Poster Resources Poster Planning � Discovery Day: Tips for Successful Posters by University of South Carolina Office of Undergraduate Research � Creating Effective Poster Presentations by George Hess, Kathryn Tosney, Leon Liegel http://www.ncsu.edu/project/posters/NewSite/index.html � How to Write

Almor, Amit

267

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Project 2E Project 2E Mapping Energy Futures: The SuperOPF Planning Tool Bill Schulze, Dick Schuler, Ray Zimmerman, Jubo Yan*, Charles Marquet* (Cornell) Dan Shawhan, Biao Mao*, Zamiyad Dar*, Andy Kindle* (RPI) John Taber (FERC) Network reductions from Dan Tylavsky, Di Shi, Yingying Qi*, Yujia Zhu* (ASU) * Graduate Student PSERC Existing Planning Tools * Are very detailed but do not optimize investment over the planning region, or * Are highly aggregated using bubbles and pipes (or only a small number of nodes) to represent the network, and * None include environmental modeling of ambient pollution * Few or none include joint variation of load, wind, and solar, by location PSERC SuperOPF Planning Tool Uses three network reductions (for the EI, ERCOT and WECC) from Dan

268

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1, 2013 (NEW PROJECT) Planned end date: September 30, 2014 Key Milestones 1. 200g Dark Red Pigment, End Q1 2. Additional Pigments Identified, End Q2 3. 500g of 2 New Pigments,...

269

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Due Date M-062-40D Submit System Plan 10312014 M-062-40ZZ Submit One Time Tank Waste Supplemental Treatment Technologies Report 10312014 M-045-61 Phase 2 RCRA Facility...

270

Dynamic sub-transmission substation expansion planning using learning automata  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This paper presents a new method to solve the dynamic sub-transmission substation expansion planning (SSEP) in electric power distribution networks. The method employs a new algorithm based on learning automata for optimization process. The developed algorithm includes different electrical constraints such as voltage drops, thermal limits, power flow and radial flow constraints. Moreover, prevalent cost indices are taken into consideration. The proposed method is used to solve the dynamic SSEP for Birjand city, center of South-Khorasan province of Iran, up to the year 2024. In addition, effects of the dynamic and pseudo-dynamic planning models are investigated at the study region and the obtained results are compared to those of genetic algorithm. Detailed numerical results and comparisons presented in the paper show that the proposed approach leads to proper solutions and can be used as an effective tool for the dynamic sub-transmission substation expansion planning in an actual large scale distribution network.

Seyed Mahdi Mazhari; Hassan Monsef

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

271

Pretreatment Technology Plan  

SciTech Connect

This technology plan presents a strategy for the identification, evaluation, and development of technologies for the pretreatment of radioactive wastes stored in underground storage tanks at the Hanford Site. This strategy includes deployment of facilities and process development schedules to support the other program elements. This document also presents schedule information for alternative pretreatment systems: (1) the reference pretreatment technology development system, (2) an enhanced pretreatment technology development system, and (3) alternative pretreatment technology development systems.

Barker, S.A. [Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA (US); Thornhill, C.K.; Holton, L.K. Jr. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (US)

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

272

Tax-Advantaged Plans  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Plans Tax-Advantaged Plans A comprehensive benefits package with plan options for health care and retirement to take care of our employees today and tomorrow. Contact...

273

Influencing managerial cognition and decisions using scenarios for long-range planning  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This dissertation presents empirical findings related to two aspects of long-range planning: scenario planning as a planning method and cognition of planners. Long-range planning situations are encountered when designing ...

Phadnis, Shardul Sharad, 1978-

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

274

Present State and Future Plan of MCF Research in China  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Power supply system SC magnet test ICRH & LHCD system 2kW/4.5K Cryogenic & refrigerator system Vacuum

275

Climate Action Plan Presentation Assembly Bill 32 Goals  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

6,500-9,200 Sulfur Hexafluoride 23,900 #12;On Campus Stationary Sources · Consumption of Natural Gas of a percent. #12;Scope 1 ­ Direct Emissions · Consumption of Natural Gas, Propane, and Diesel · Refrigerant that the University changed from a gas boiler plant to electric resistance boiler plant in 1993. #12;Emission Trends

de Lijser, Peter

276

CTR Summer Program 2012 Presentation of Research Plans  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Large eddy simulation of self-noise from a wind turbine airfoil at high angle of attack 10:35am Further, Moreau Stéphane Uncertainty quantification of turbo-engine fan noise Giret Jean-Christophe, Moreau Stéphane Uncertainty quantification of the far-field noise from a Rod-Airfoil configuration using

Prinz, Friedrich B.

277

Planning for the National Ignition Campaign on NIF Presentation to  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

yields>1 MJ (an ignition margin >1) with the expected precision of target experiments, laser performance by melting with the first shock ·We predict an ignition margin >1 at the point design laser energy #12;A CH that roll up to set the ignition conditions ~150 lower parameters 1D quantities, e.g: Peak Laser Power Foot

278

Your Presentation Share your research project, business plan,  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ZURICH ON 23 SEPTEMBER 2014 The Falling Walls Lab Zurich is hosted by ETH Zurich in collaboration minute talks. Falling Walls Lab Zurich 23 September 2014 at the Miller`s Studio (Mühle Tiefenbrunnen), Seefeldstrasse 225, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland Start: 6 pm QUESTIONS? Send an e-mail: fallingwalls@ethz.ch APPLY

Richner, Heinz

279

ACQUISITION PLANNING  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7.1 (May 2010) 7.1 (May 2010) 1 ACQUISITION PLANNING REFERENCES 1. FAR 4.803(a)(1) Contents of Contract Files 2. FAR 5.405(a) Exchange of Acquisition Information 3. FAR Part 7 Acquisition Planning 4. FAR Part 8 Required Sources of Supply 5. FAR Part 10 Market Research 6. FAR 11.402 Factors to Consider in Establishing Schedules 7. FAR 15.201(c) Exchanges with Industry Before Receipt of Proposals 8. FAR Subpart 16.1 Selecting Contract Types 9. FAR 16.504(c) Indefinite-Quantity Contracts - Multiple Award Preference 10. FAR Subpart 17.6 Management and Operating Contracts 11. FAR Part 19 Small Business Programs 12. FAR 25.802(a)(2) Other International Agreements and Coordination 13. FAR 34.004 Acquisition Strategy Guiding Principles

280

ACQUISITION PLANNING  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

--Chapter 7.1 (JUNE 2010) --Chapter 7.1 (JUNE 2010) 2 ACQUISITION PLANNING REFERENCES 1. FAR 4.803(a)(1) Contents of Contract Files 2. FAR 5.405(a) Exchange of Acquisition Information 3. FAR Part 7 Acquisition Planning 4. FAR Part 8 Required Sources of Supply 5. FAR Part 10 Market Research 6. FAR 11.402 Factors to Consider in Establishing Schedules 7. FAR 15.201(c) Exchanges with Industry Before Receipt of Proposals 8. FAR Subpart 16.1 Selecting Contract Types 9. FAR 16.504(c) Indefinite-Quantity Contracts - Multiple Award Preference 10. FAR Subpart 17.6 Management and Operating Contracts 11. FAR Part 19 Small Business Programs 12. FAR 25.802(a)(2) Other International Agreements and Coordination Guiding Principles

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "investigation planning presentation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

RHIC Status & Plans RHIC Status & Plans Steve Vigdor NSAC Implementation Subcommittee Hearings Sept. 7, 2012 Upcoming Speakers & Topics: I. S. Vigdor (BNL ALD) - Facility status and plans; science accomplishments and goals; timeline for next decade; path to eRHIC II. U. Wiedemann (CERN) - - Theory drivers & view from LHC III. P. Sorensen (2008 George E. Valley Prize) - RHIC physics with soft probes IV. Y. Akiba (201 1 Nishina Memorial Prize) - RHIC physics with hard probes V. S. Vigdor - Take- away messages & answers to questions Incremental Upgrades ⇒ Dramatic Improvements in Collider Performance & Versatility 2 new colliding beam species in 2012 B h+v pickups Y h+v kickers B h+v kickers Y h+v pickups Measure deviations

282

Proposal/Grant Writing: Planning, Writing, Reviewing  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Proposal/Grant Writing: Planning, Writing, Reviewing December 7th, 2010 #12;Presentation Overview ·General Proposal Writing Planning for success Writing Reviewing ·Specifics for non-governmental funding agencies ·Resources available at Michigan Tech to help you 2 #12;Planning 3 #12;Larger Context ·Research

283

Special nuclear material inventory sampling plans  

SciTech Connect

This paper presents improved procedures for obtaining statistically valid sampling plans for nuclear facilities. The double sampling concept and methods for developing optimal double sampling plans are described. An algorithm is described that is satisfactory for finding optimal double sampling plans and choosing appropriate detection and false alarm probabilities. (ACR)

Vaccaro, H.S.; Goldman, A.S.

1987-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

284

Meeting and Presentation Materials  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

QUALITY ASSURANCE CORPORATE BOARD MEETING QUALITY ASSURANCE CORPORATE BOARD MEETING Augusta, Georgia March 19, 2009 Key Workshop Objectives: 1. Provide Board Members a Summary of Actions Accomplished since the last Corporate Board Meeting in November 2008. 2. Review and Discuss the EM/EFCOG Project Action Plan Working Groups' Progress and Completed Deliverables. 3. Provide Briefings on Quality Assurance Lessons Learned for Discussion. Desired Outcomes: 1. Board Members Vote on EM/EFCOG Quality Assurance Improvement Initiative Project Plan Deliverables. 2. Board Members Vote on Proposed EM Standard QA Contract Language. 3. Select Location and Date for Next EM QA Corporate Board Meeting.

285

Meeting and Presentation Materials  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EM QUALITY ASSURANCE CORPORATE BOARD MEETING EM QUALITY ASSURANCE CORPORATE BOARD MEETING Atlanta, Georgia November 13 -14, 2008 Key Workshop Objectives: 1. Provide Board Members an Overview and Progress Accomplished with Actions from the 2 nd Corporate Board Meeting on July 29-20, 2008. 2. Review and Discuss the EM/EFCOG Project Action Plan Working Groups' Progress and Completed Deliverables. 3. Provide Briefings on Quality Assurance Lessons Learned for Discussion. 4. Discuss with Board Members the Results and Lessons Learned of the EM QA Corporate Performance Metrics Pilot Tests. Desired Outcomes: 1. Executive Corporate Board Members Vote on EM/EFCOG Quality Assurance Improvement Initiative Project Plan Deliverables.

286

Maps and Plans  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

shrouded door to box seats. Rose / Maps and Plans Re-Placing Places 20.1 Rose / Maps and Plans Re-Placing PlacesMaps and Plans Thomas Rose Architectural plans create the

Rose, Thomas

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

287

Geothermal Technologies Program Multi-Year Research, Development and Demonstration Plan: Technical Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Geothermal Technologies Program Multi-Year Research, Development and Demonstration Plan presents the status of geothermal energy technologies and details program plans from 2009 through 2015, with program activities through 2025.

288

Annual Training Plan Template  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Annual Training Plan Template is used by an organization's training POC to draft their organization's annual training plan.

289

ICDF Complex Operations Waste Management Plan  

SciTech Connect

This Waste Management Plan functions as a management and planning tool for managing waste streams generated as a result of operations at the Idaho CERCLA Disposal Facility (ICDF) Complex. The waste management activities described in this plan support the selected remedy presented in the Waste Area Group 3, Operable Unit 3-13 Final Record of Decision for the operation of the Idaho CERCLA Disposal Facility Complex. This plan identifies the types of waste that are anticipated during operations at the Idaho CERCLA Disposal Facility Complex. In addition, this plan presents management strategies and disposition for these anticipated waste streams.

W.M. Heileson

2006-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

290

Exploring Photovoltaics (9 investigations) | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

information about the student activitylesson plan from your search. Grades 9-12 Subject Solar Summary Hands-on investigations to teach secondary students the scientific concepts...

291

Academic Expectations Presentation Introductions  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Theater Music East Asian Languages & Cultures Health Policy & Management Art History Cinema Theater OnlineTools and Resources MinorsMinors Long-Term Plan At Orientation (Tomorrow) GroupAdvisement Computer Programs and Resources #12;Transition to USC and Viterbi Explore,Connect, Succeed! Orientation

Wang, Hai

292

Enduring Stockpile CMM Shell Inspection Plan (U)  

SciTech Connect

The slides are intended to serve as a high level summary of the CMM Shell Inspection Plan as presented to Pu Sustainment Legacy Pit Production IPT.

Montano, Joshua D. [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Flores, Randy A. [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2012-06-13T23:59:59.000Z

293

Building America Research Planning Meeting: November 2010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On this page, you may link to the summary report and presentations for the Building America Planning meeting in November 2010, held in Washington, D.C.

294

Energy Efficiency Market Sustainable Business Planning  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Energy Efficiency Market Sustainable Business Planning, a presentation by Danielle Sass Byrnett of the U.S. Department of Energy's Better Buildings Neighborhood Program.

295

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Presented by: Upgrades to Engineering Controls, Administrative Controls, Worker Training, Industrial Hygiene Procedures, Occupational Medicine Programs and Oversight 2009-Present...

296

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ISO New England Comments on the ISO New England Comments on the National Electric Transmission Congestion Study Department of Energy Workshop Philadelphia, PA December 6, 2011 Michael I. Henderson Director Regional Planning and Coordination, System Planning DOE Workshop - December 6, 2011 © 2011 ISO New England Inc. Key Facts About New England's Electric Power System and Wholesale Electricity Markets 2 6.5 million households and businesses; population 14 million Over 300 generators totaling 32,000 MW of capacity Over 8,000 miles of transmission lines 13 interconnections to electricity systems in New York and Canada 2,035 MW of demand-resources All-time peak demand of 28,130 MW, set on August 2, 2006 More than 450 participants in the marketplace (those who generate, buy, sell, transport, and use wholesale

297

Planning Tool for Strategic Evaluation of Facility Plans - 13570  

SciTech Connect

Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) has developed a strategic planning tool for the evaluation of the utilization of its unique resources for processing and research and development of nuclear materials. The Planning Tool is a strategic level tool for assessing multiple missions that could be conducted utilizing the SRNL facilities and showcasing the plan. Traditional approaches using standard scheduling tools and laying out a strategy on paper tended to be labor intensive and offered either a limited or cluttered view for visualizing and communicating results. A tool that can assess the process throughput, duration, and utilization of the facility was needed. SRNL teamed with Newport News Shipbuilding (NNS), a division of Huntington Ingalls Industries, to create the next generation Planning Tool. The goal of this collaboration was to create a simulation based tool that allows for quick evaluation of strategies with respect to new or changing missions, and clearly communicates results to the decision makers. This tool has been built upon a mature modeling and simulation software previously developed by NNS. The Planning Tool provides a forum for capturing dependencies, constraints, activity flows, and variable factors. It is also a platform for quickly evaluating multiple mission scenarios, dynamically adding/updating scenarios, generating multiple views for evaluating/communicating results, and understanding where there are areas of risks and opportunities with respect to capacity. The Planning Tool that has been developed is useful in that it presents a clear visual plan for the missions at the Savannah River Site (SRS). It not only assists in communicating the plans to SRS corporate management, but also allows the area stakeholders a visual look at the future plans for SRS. The design of this tool makes it easily deployable to other facility and mission planning endeavors. (authors)

Magoulas, Virginia; Cercy, Michael [Savannah River National Laboratory, Savannah River Site, Aiken, SC 29808 (United States)] [Savannah River National Laboratory, Savannah River Site, Aiken, SC 29808 (United States); Hall, Irin [Newport News Shipbuilding, 4101 Washington Ave., Newport News, VA 23607 (United States)] [Newport News Shipbuilding, 4101 Washington Ave., Newport News, VA 23607 (United States)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

298

Eastern Interconnection Planning Collaborative News Release | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Eastern Interconnection Planning Collaborative News Release Eastern Interconnection Planning Collaborative News Release Eastern Interconnection Planning Collaborative News Release The Eastern Interconnection Planning Collaborative (EIPC) today announced that its diverse array of stakeholders has reached consensus on the final set of "resource expansion futures" to be studied as part of the electric system transmission planning effort funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Eastern Interconnection Planning Collaborative News Release More Documents & Publications Electricity Advisory Committee Meeting Presentations October 2011 - Interconnection-Wide Transmission Planning Processes 2012 National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - Philadelphia Workshop EAC Recommendations for DOE Action Regarding Interconnection-Wide Planning

299

VIRTUAL PRESENTERS: TOWARDS INTERACTIVE VIRTUAL PRESENTATIONS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

the interesting parts of a sculpture or painting, addressing one, several or all persons in his or her audience be a painting, displayed and explained in a virtual museum environment. There are many examples of research they aim at giving the presentation task to a robot or virtual agent. In the latter case we can have one

Nijholt, Anton

300

Performance Confirmation Plan  

SciTech Connect

As described, the purpose of the Performance Confirmation Plan is to specify monitoring, testing, and analysis activities for evaluating the accuracy and adequacy of the information used to determine that performance objectives for postclosure will be met. This plan defines a number of specific performance confirmation activities and associated test concepts in support of the MGR that will be implemented to fulfill this purpose. In doing so, the plan defines an approach to identify key factors and processes, predict performance, establish tolerances and test criteria, collect data (through monitoring, testing, and experiments), analyze these data, and recommend appropriate action. The process of defining which factors to address under performance confirmation incorporates input from several areas. In all cases, key performance confirmation factors are those factors which are: (1) important to safety, (2) measurable and predictable, and (3) relevant to the program (i.e., a factor that i s affected by construction, emplacement, or is a time-dependent variable). For the present version of the plan, performance confirmation factors important to safety are identified using the principal factors from the RSS (CRWMS M and O 2000a) (which is derived from TSPA analyses) together with other available performance assessment analyses. With this basis, key performance confirmation factors have been identified, and test concepts and test descriptions have been developed in the plan. Other activities are also incorporated into the performance confirmation program outside of these key factors. Additional activities and tests have been incorporated when they are prescribed by requirements and regulations or are necessary to address data needs and model validation requirements relevant to postclosure safety. These other activities have been included with identified factors to construct the overall performance confirmation program.

Lindner, E.N.

2000-05-19T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "investigation planning presentation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Web Service Composition as a Planning Task: Experiments using Knowledge-Based Planning  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

), in this paper, we present some empirical evidence to validate the effectiveness of us- ing knowledge-based planning techniques for solving WSC problems. In our experiments we utilize the PKS (Planning users to register/login prior to browsing resources. Some work has addressed the problem of planning un

Lespérance, Yves

302

Bisfuel links - Presentations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Presentations Devens Gust - Lecture at American Chemical Society Meeting EFRC 2011 Summit and Forum Materials (presentations and videos) Pat Dehmer - talk at the Science for our...

303

IACT Publications and Presentations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Publications and Presentations Peer-Reviewed Publications Conference Proceedings, Abstracts, Presentations, and Poster Sessions IACT-funded Master and Doctoral Theses September...

304

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Region Region (RMCCS) Dr. Vince Matthews - Colorado Geological Survey Wayne Rowe - Schlumberger Carbon Services Bill O'Dowd RMCCS * Project Overview - Regional Geology - Site Specific Characterization - Basin-wide Characterization * Well Construction RMCCS * Project Overview - Regional Geology - Site Specific Characterization - Basin-wide Characterization * Well Construction 4.8 miles North South Dakota Sandstone Chinle Entrada contact . Example of fracture behavior in steeply dipping Entrada sandstone Weber sandstone outcrop White Rim Sandstone The Plan - Year 1 Characterize the Structure Pick location for drill hole Build database Purchase seismic Process & interpret seismic Map surface structure Shoot additional seismic lines Permit well Dakota Structure Around Strat Test Well Locations of Reprocessed

305

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transmission Transmission Investments Under Uncertainty CERTS Reliability & Markets Internal Program Review Ithaca, Aug. 6-7, 2013 Benjamin F. Hobbs Francisco D. Munoz Saamrat Kasina Jonathan Ho Outline 1. Introduction 2. Model Overview, Realistic Test-Case: WECC 240 3. Results 4. Bounding & Decomposition Approaches 5. MATPower/SuperOPF as Planning Subproblem 6. Conclusions 1.1 Introduction Solar Resources (NREL) Wind Resources (NREL) U.S. Transmission System Zone Scenario Generation and Transmission Cost (MISO 2010) Transmission Investments Optimal: Combination of Local & Regional Generation 1.2 More Challenges * Hyper uncertainty: * Fuel Costs * Demand Growth * Technology Costs * Carbon Tax * Demand Response * PEV * RPS * Distributed Generation

306

presentations | netl.doe.gov  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Gasifipedia Gasifier Optimization Feed Systems Syngas Processing Systems Analyses Gasification Plant Databases International Activity Program Plan Project Portfolio Project...

307

Strategies for automatic online treatment plan reoptimization using clinical treatment planning system: A planning parameters study  

SciTech Connect

Purpose: Adaptive radiation therapy for prostate cancer using online reoptimization provides an improved control of interfractional anatomy variations. However, the clinical implementation of online reoptimization is currently limited by the low efficiency of current strategies and the difficulties associated with integration into the current treatment planning system. This study investigates the strategies for performing fast (?2 min) automatic online reoptimization with a clinical fluence-map-based treatment planning system; and explores the performance with different input parameters settings: dose-volume histogram (DVH) objective settings, starting stage, and iteration number (in the context of real time planning).Methods: Simulated treatments of 10 patients were reoptimized daily for the first week of treatment (5 fractions) using 12 different combinations of optimization strategies. Options for objective settings included guideline-based RTOG objectives, patient-specific objectives based on anatomy on the planning CT, and daily-CBCT anatomy-based objectives adapted from planning CT objectives. Options for starting stages involved starting reoptimization with and without the original plan's fluence map. Options for iteration numbers were 50 and 100. The adapted plans were then analyzed by statistical modeling, and compared both in terms of dosimetry and delivery efficiency.Results: All online reoptimized plans were finished within ?2 min with excellent coverage and conformity to the daily target. The three input parameters, i.e., DVH objectives, starting stage, and iteration number, contributed to the outcome of optimization nearly independently. Patient-specific objectives generally provided better OAR sparing compared to guideline-based objectives. The benefit in high-dose sparing from incorporating daily anatomy into objective settings was positively correlated with the relative change in OAR volumes from planning CT to daily CBCT. The use of the original plan fluence map as the starting stage reduced OAR dose at the mid-dose region, but increased the monitor units by 17%. Differences of only 2cc or less in OAR V50%/V70Gy/V76Gy were observed between 100 and 50 iterations.Conclusions: It is feasible to perform automatic online reoptimization in ?2 min using a clinical treatment planning system. Selecting optimal sets of input parameters is the key to achieving high quality reoptimized plans, and should be based on the individual patient's daily anatomy, delivery efficiency, and time allowed for plan adaptation.

Li, Taoran; Wu, Qiuwen; Zhang, You; Vergalasova, Irina; Lee, W. Robert; Yin, Fang-Fang; Wu, Q. Jackie [Duke Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27705 and Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710 (United States)] [Duke Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27705 and Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710 (United States)

2013-11-15T23:59:59.000Z

308

STEP Partner Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

STEP Partner Presentation, from the Tool Kit Framework: Small Town University Energy Program (STEP).

309

LANS DB PENSION PLAN  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

December 2010 December 2010 u:\my documents\pension plan\revised tcp1 db plan spd dec 2010.doc LANS Defined Benefit Pension Plan Summary Plan Description This Summary Plan Description (SPD) is intended to provide a summary of the principal features of the LANS Defined Benefit Pension Plan ("Plan") and is not meant to interpret, extend or change the Plan in any way. This SPD will continue to be updated. Please check back on a regular basis for the most recent version. Nothing in the Plan and/or this SPD shall be construed as giving any member the right to be retained in service with LANS or any affiliated company, or as a guarantee of any rights or benefits under the Plan. LANS, in its sole discretion, reserves the right to amend the SPD or Plan, or to terminate the Plan, at any time.

310

Knowledge Preconditions for Plans  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......research-article Original Articles Knowledge Preconditions for Plans ERNEST DAVIS...of time and a possible worlds model of knowledge. The definitions strictly subsume previous...semantics of plans|formal theory of knowledge.| Knowledge Preconditions for Plans......

ERNEST DAVIS

1994-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

311

STRATEGIC TRANSMISSION INVESTMENT PLAN  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION STRATEGIC TRANSMISSION INVESTMENT PLAN Prepared in Support of the 2007. Blevins #12; i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The 2007 Strategic Transmission Investment Plan was prepared Investment Plan. California Energy Commission, Engineering Office. CEC7002007018CTF. #12; ii #12; iii

312

STRATEGIC TRANSMISSION INVESTMENT PLAN  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION STRATEGIC TRANSMISSION INVESTMENT PLAN Prepared in Support of the 2007 Investment Plan was prepared with contribution from the following Energy Commission staff and consultants Kondoleon, Chuck Najarian. 2007 Strategic Transmission Investment Plan. California Energy Commission

313

ACTION PLANS STRATEGIC PRIORITY: Role Clarification (revised)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

with the President, Director & Associate Director. Review current communications plan for Executive and BoardACTION PLANS STRATEGIC PRIORITY: Role Clarification (revised) GOAL Foster pride and participation informed MAA Board Investigate an increase in number of Executive Committee meetings with standard agenda

Thompson, Michael

314

U.S. Food and Drug Administration Inspections of Clinical Investigators: Overview of Results from 1977 to 2009  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...investigational plan is either a...10). A review of phase I...that current regulatory practices often...investigational plan, noted in...Kurzrock Writing, review, and or revision...justify further regulatory action; any corrective plan is left to...

Sonia K. Morgan-Linnell; David J. Stewart; and Razelle Kurzrock

2014-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

315

Venus Technology Plan Venus Technology Plan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Venus Technology Plan May 2014 #12; ii Venus Technology Plan At the Venus Exploration a Roadmap for Venus Exploration (RVE) that is consistent with VEXAG priorities as well as Planetary Decadal Survey priorities, and (3) develop a Technology Plan for future Venus missions (after a Technology

Rathbun, Julie A.

316

Lesson Learned by Savannah River Site Activity-level Work Planning and Control  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Slide Presentation by Bonnie Barnes, Savannah River Remediation. Work Planning and Control at Savannah River Remediation.

317

4865 recreation planning [n  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

landsc. plan. pol. recr....(Development of policies, strategies and measures for the provision of recreation areas and facilities; ? urban area recreation planning ...

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

318

Marketing Planning: Feeniks Koulu.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

??Degree Thesis Marketing Planning: Feeniks Koulu demonstrates structured marketing planning process with the help of case company Feeniks Koulu. The central idea of Thesis is (more)

Raut, Biranjan

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

319

AMIE (ACRF MJO Investigation Experiment)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

AMIE AMIE (ACRF MJO Investigation Experiment) Planning Meeting AMIE Science Steering Committee Chuck Long, Tony DelGenio, Bill Gustafson, Bob Houze, Mike Jensen, Steve Klein, Ruby Leung, Xaihong Liu, Ed Luke, Peter May, Sally McFarlane, Pat Minnis, Courtney Schumacher, Andy Vogelmann, Yi Wang, Xiaoqing Wu, Shaohong Xie Agenda * Proposal due May 1 !!!!!! * Primary purpose of this meeting is discussions and planning in support of

320

Senior Debt Fastball Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Plenary III: Project Finance and Investment Senior Debt Fastball Presentation Phillip Thomas, Senior Vice President of Commercial Lending, Heartland Bank

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "investigation planning presentation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Portfolio Manager Overview Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This presentation, given through the DOE's Technical Assitance Program (TAP), provides information on the Portfolio Manager Overview

322

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Maine Yankee Reactor Vessel Maine Yankee Reactor Vessel Removal & Barge Transport U.S. Department of Energy TEC Working Group April 4-5, 2005 Phoenix, Arizona Ted Feigenbaum Maine Yankee President & CEO The Maine Yankee Reactor Pressure Vessel Project Ingredients for Success Solid Planning + Flawless Implementation + Extensive Communication = . . . Success The reactor pressure vessel (RPV) internals, before segmentation. 2001 The segmented RPV internals. 2001 The arrival of the RPV shipping container cover at Maine Yankee. May 2001 Vessel lift from Containment for transfer to the shipping container. August 2002 Vessel transfer to the shipping container. August 2002 The empty RPV shipping container and skid in the back yard. 2001 The shipping container, staged in the Containment

323

Meeting and Presentation Materials  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

QUALITY ASSURANCE CORPORATE BOARD MEETING QUALITY ASSURANCE CORPORATE BOARD MEETING Denver, Colorado July 29 -30, 2008 Key Workshop Objectives: 1. Inform Board Members of Ongoing and Future EM QA Initiatives. 2. Review and Discuss the Draft EM/EFCOG Project Action Plan for the Top Five Priority Issues Identified by Site Federal and Contractor Executives in 1 st EM QA Board Meeting in March 2008. 3. Brief and Discuss with Board Members the Proposed EM Corporate Performance Metrics System Concept and Approach. 4. Review the Progress of EM HQ and Sites to Establish QA Managers and to Allocate Adequate QA Resources. Desired Outcomes: 1. Executive Board Members Vote on Draft EM/EFCOG Project Action

324

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Tribal Leader Forum Series Feb 7-8 2012 Tribal Leader Forum Series Feb 7-8 2012 Transmission Basics Facilities, Interconnection and Permitting Laurie A. Woodall Esq. Laurie.Woodall@URS.com 602 648 2385 Office 480 291 3522 Mobile 2 Tribal Leader Forum Series Feb 7-8 2012 Overview * Basics regarding electrical system * Basics of transmission planning * Basics regarding interconnection * Basics of typical siting/state permitting processes for transmission lines 3 Tribal Leader Forum Series Feb 7-8 2012 Useful Links * EEI siting directory of agencies http://www.eei.org/ourissues/ElectricityTransmission/Documents/ State_Generation_Transmission_Siting_Directory.pdf * OSHA illustrated glossary of electrical components http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/electric_power/illustrated_gloss ary/index.html

325

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

October 22-23 2010 October 22-23 2010 ATLAS Upgrade Plans - Science Guy Savard Argonne National Laboratory and University of Chicago G. Savard October 22-23 2010 ATLAS 25 th Anniversary Celebration Outline Overview of ATLAS near future program Longer term physics program needs and role in community Proposed upgrade stages and physics capabilities G. Savard October 22-23 2010 ATLAS 25 th Anniversary Celebration ATLAS now and near future CARIBU Energy Upgrade Cryomodule ATLAS has served the low-energy community well - more than 100000 hrs of beam on target Capabilities have steadily increased. It now offers its users: - Stable beams at medium intensity - Some in-flight radioactive beams * light beams, no chemical limitations, close to stability, low intensity,

326

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Carlos Apache Tribe Carlos Apache Tribe San Carlos Apache Mission Statement The Apache People will live a balanced life in harmony with spirituality, culture, language, and family unity in an ever-changing world. The Apache People shall create a strategic framework for our tribe to grow and prosper. San Carlos Apache Tribe And Reservation * Membership: approx 15,000 * Unemployment rate: 67% * 11 member tribal council * Apache Gold Casino * 1.83 million acres. * 800,000+ acres wooded/forested. * 1M ac. riparian/ grasslands/desert. * 2nd highest rated level of solar resource potential San Carlos Apache Reservation S a n C a r l o s A p a c h e T r i b e 2008 - 2013 Energy Initiatives * 2008: DOE ARRA Energy grant (TA/Energy Plan/lighting retrofits, solar at radio station/1 st

327

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Area: Resource Adequacy Area: Resource Adequacy Reliability and Markets: Project 3A Long-term Planning and Investment for Transmission and Generation Tim Mount, Cornell University Fernando Alvarado, U. of Wisconsin 18 October 2006 Arlington, VA OE Visualization and Controls Peer Review Page 2 2 OUTLINE Maintaining Generation Adequacy Missing Money and Capacity Markets. Co-Optimization in Markets for Energy and Reserves. Testing the Forward Capacity Market in New England. Economic Cost of Congestion Increasing Transmission Congestion due to Voltage. Modeling the Financial Risk of Spatial Price Differences. New Responsibilities for FERC in EPAct05. Summary and Outreach to Stakeholders Publications Collaboration with System Operators Next steps Page 3 3 Source: "2005 NERC Long-Term Reliability Assessment", Fig. 4

328

Meeting and Presentation Materials  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

M M a n a g e m e n t Quality Assurance Corporate Board Meeting June 9, 2010 Chicago, Illinois 7 th EM Quality Assurance Corporate Board Meeting June 9, 2010 Chicago, Illinois Table of Contents 1. Agenda 2. By-Laws (Distributed for Board Vote via Email) 3. Focus Area Distribution (Distributed for Board Vote via Email) 4. Draft Project Plan for Current Focus Areas 5. Overview of Current Corporate Quality Assurance Issues, Challenges, and Priorities 6. Industry Perspective 7. Technical Approach to Implement NQA-1 Suppliers Focus Area 8. Technical Approach to Implement CGD Focus Area 9. Technical Approach to Implement Design Quality Assurance Focus Area 10. Proposed Technical Approach for Grading QA for Deactivation & Decommissioning

329

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

CPWG Instruments Group CPWG Instruments Group Report Chuck Long With help from: Rich Coulter, Jim Mather, Kevin Widener, Eugene Clothiaux, Jimmy Voyles, Others... Moving forward * New 3-channel MWRs - Purchase of 2 this FY, soliciting bids - Tentative plans for 2/yr until one for each CF and spares are purchased. * Photo-acoustic aerosol absorption instrument in process * Upgrade for the BOM C-Pol radar has gone through On hold * SUNY Oxygen A-band instrument - de-scoped by the ACRF Review Board - Concerns over having 3 separate "development" instrument systems come in all in the same year MMCRs * Barrow antenna replaced in December * Measuring circular cross-pol until early Feb when problem found (thanks Jay and Hans!) * SGP antenna next for replacement * SGP to be upgraded to PIRAQ in next

330

Strategic Plan 2007 - Making Today's Change, Protecting Tomorrow's Future |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Strategic Plan 2007 - Making Today's Change, Protecting Tomorrow's Strategic Plan 2007 - Making Today's Change, Protecting Tomorrow's Future Strategic Plan 2007 - Making Today's Change, Protecting Tomorrow's Future The Office of Legacy Management's (LM) Strategic Plan explains the Office's responsibilities and outlines a comprehensive management plan extending out to the year 2020 for all legacy issues. The goals, strategies, and performance measures presented here define the indicators of progress towards our vision of a Department that meets our legal, regulatory, and contractual commitments to other federal, state, and local government agencies, public interest or community groups, and individuals. 2007 Strategic Plan More Documents & Publications Stategic Plan 2004 - Making Today's Change, Protecting Tomorrow's Future

331

Strategic Plan 2007 - Making Today's Change, Protecting Tomorrow's Future |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Strategic Plan 2007 - Making Today's Change, Protecting Tomorrow's Strategic Plan 2007 - Making Today's Change, Protecting Tomorrow's Future Strategic Plan 2007 - Making Today's Change, Protecting Tomorrow's Future The Office of Legacy Management's (LM) Strategic Plan explains the Office's responsibilities and outlines a comprehensive management plan extending out to the year 2020 for all legacy issues. The goals, strategies, and performance measures presented here define the indicators of progress towards our vision of a Department that meets our legal, regulatory, and contractual commitments to other federal, state, and local government agencies, public interest or community groups, and individuals. 2007 Strategic Plan More Documents & Publications Stategic Plan 2004 - Making Today's Change, Protecting Tomorrow's Future

332

Project Management Plan to Maintain Safe and Compliant Conditions at the Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP)  

SciTech Connect

This Project Management Plan presents the overall plan, description, mission, and workscope for the Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP) maintain safe and compliant conditions project at PFP.

COX, G.J.

1999-10-25T23:59:59.000Z

333

Motion Planning ! Jana Kosecka!  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1! Motion Planning ! Jana Kosecka! Department of Computer Science! ·Discrete planning, graph search://cs.cmu.edu/~motionplanning, Jyh-Ming Lien! Discrete Planning! · Review of some discrete planning methods! · Given state space is discrete) ! · Use well developed search and graph traversal algorithms to find the path! · Path: set

Kosecka, Jana

334

Climate change action plan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Delivery Climate change action plan 2009-2011 #12;2 | Climate change action plan ©istockphoto.com #12;Climate Change Action Plan Climate change action plan | 3 Contents Overview 4 Preface and Introduction 5 Climate change predictions for Scotland 6 The role of forestry 7 Protecting and managing

335

Intermountain Province Subbasin Plan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, and stakeholders. The IMP subbasin plan includes: · an assessment providing the technical foundation for the plan Power and Conservation Council Portland, Oregon O N B E H A L F O F : Intermountain Province Oversight Planning in the Intermountain Province The Northwest Power Planning Council1 's (Council) 2000 Fish

336

EOS Land Validation Presentations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

EOS Land Validation Presentations EOS Land Validation Presentations Meeting: Land Cover Validation Workshop Date: February 2, 2004 Place: Boston, MA Title: Validation Data Support Activities at the ORNL DAAC (Power Point) Presenter: Bob Cook Meeting: Fall 2003 American Geophysical Union (AGU) Meeting Date: December 9, 2003 Place: San Francisco, CA Title: Ground-Based Data Supporting the Validation of MODIS Land Products (Power Point) Presenter: Larry Voorhees Meeting: Terra and Aqua Products Review Date: March 2003 Place: NASA HQ Title: Supporting the Validation of MODIS Land Products (Power Point) Presenter: Larry Voorhees Meeting: Terra and Aqua Products Review Date: March 2003 Place: NASA HQ Title: MODIS Land Summary (Power Point) Presenter: Chris Justice, University of Maryland Meeting: Spring 2002 American Geophysical Union (AGU) Meeting

337

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Working Session Working Session Presented to: Transportation External Coordination Rail Topic Group Transportation External Coordination Rail Topic Group Presented by: Presented by: Chair, Jay Jones Office of National Transportation March 15 2006 March 15 2006 Washington, DC Washington, DC 2 Agenda * Welcome and Introduction * Roll Call * Status/Update on Rail Topic Group at large * Update/Discussion from Individual Subgroups * Summary of CSG/Midwest Routing Project * Update of CSG/NE Routing Project * TRAGIS Update * Wrap Up * Subgroup Breakout

338

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Update Update Presented to: Presented to: Transportation External Coordination Working Group Transportation External Coordination Working Group Presented by: Presented by: Jay Jones Jay Jones Office of National Transportation Office of National Transportation September 21, 2005 September 21, 2005 Pueblo, CO Pueblo, CO 2 Summary * Summary of Previous Transportation External Coordination (TEC) Rail Topic Group meeting * Summary of meeting with rail industry * Proposed Topic Group activities * Current issues and next steps 3 Summary Previous TEC Rail Topic Group Meeting * Request the Office of National Transportation to wait for SRGs to submit individual routing recommendations * Update from SRGs on their routing process * Topic Group recommendations: - Identified the need for Federal Railroad Administration

339

General Presentation Template  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Steve Pfaff August 8, 2013 Safety Culture Improvement: Past, Present, and Future PAST DNFSB Recommendation 2011-1, June 9, 2011, Safety Culture at the Waste Treatment and...

340

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Demonstrate Engineering Design Process Illustrate Math and Science Concepts Explore Robot Concepts, Designs and Functions Exhibit and Vendor Area Presentation Nine Different...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "investigation planning presentation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

SALC 2014 Presentations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This page provides links to DOE presentations given at the 2014 Illuminating Engineering Society Street and Area Lighting Conference (SALC), held September 14-17 in Nashville, TN.

342

Poster Presentation Purpose  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

are usually done in groups, with observers milling around a large room of posters, the presentations are relaxed and more conducive to the exchange of ideas and...

343

Renewable Hydrogen (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect

Presentation about the United State's dependence on oil, how energy solutions are challenging, and why hydrogen should be considered as a long-term alternative for transportation fuel.

Remick, R. J.

2009-11-16T23:59:59.000Z

344

CEES Publications and Presentations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

CEES-Authored and Co-Authored Cover Stories Peer-Reviewed Publications Conference Proceedings, Abstracts, Presentations, and Poster Sessions Patents Frontiers in Energy Research...

345

Papers & Presentations- 2014  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Outlines Fiscal Year 2015 Goals Chris Barty Presents Talk at TIFR Colloquium September NIF Experiments Mimic Atmospheric Blast Effects Surrogate Capsule Experiments Study...

346

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Priorities Presentation to the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories Dr. David T. Danielson September 15, 2014 2 DOE Mission: Enhance U.S....

347

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Investigation of Advanced Stochastic Investigation of Advanced Stochastic Unit Commitment Solution for Optimal Management of Uncertainty C. Lindsay Anderson CERTS Review, Cornell University August 6, 2013 Overview * Objective * Proposed directions - Probabilistic constraints - Algorithms * Challenges * Conclusions What is "Advanced"? * SCUC is a multi-stage and bi-level optimization problem - Level 1: Binary unit on/off decisions - Level 2: OPF/ED submodel for security * Many variations on this structure to balance details and computational tractability * Stochastic formulations have mainly been scenario-based with dc power flow Objective * Investigation of a formulations for SCUC that will be Flexible: able to include supply and demand side resources in a realistic way, integrate with other

348

Proton beam therapy for age-related macular degeneration: development of a standard plan  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Age-related macular degeneration is the leading cause of blindness in developing countries. Irradiating the exudative form, in which a choroidal neovascular membrane develops in the subfoveal area, is presently a treatment under investigation. In 1995, Massachusetts General Hospital, collaborating with Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, initiated a protocol to treat SCNV membranes using the proton beam at the Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory and the EYEPLAN program with a light-field setup. EYEPLAN requires the axial eye length, membrane dimensions, and manipulation of the eye to include a 4.0-mm radial margin around the membrane so that the aperture margin (50% isodose line on the posterior retina) abuts the inferior aspect of the limbus. Review of 100 individually prepared plans showed that 95% of the fabricated apertures were circular (aspect ratio standard plan. Thirty-nine plans were developed for axial lengths ranging from 21.0 to 25.0 mm and membrane sizes from 1.5 to 6.75 mm in the usual way as the reviewed ones. Circular targets were outlined centered on the fovea. Distal and proximal 90% ranges (modulation) to the target, and doses to macula, optic disc, lens, ciliary body, retina, and globe were calculated. An automated standard plan requiring the same input data, but avoiding the need for individual plans, was developed. The program outputs the aperture diameter, fixation angle for the light-field setup, range and modulation, and calculates dose to the macula and optic nerve and percentage of retina receiving ? 50% and ? 90% of the prescribed dose. Individual plans require approximately 1.5 hours; the standard plan, 5 minutes. The standard plan could have treated 86% of the reviewed plans. The automated plan provides accurate and efficient treatment parameters for the majority of patients.

Judy A Adams; Kenneth L Paiva; John E Munzenrider; Joan W Miller; Evangelos S Gragoudas

1999-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

349

Money Matters Parent Presentation  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Money Matters Parent Presentation Presented by Becky Lore June 7, 2014 #12;Money Matters · Dates.fcac-acfc.gc.ca · Gail Vaz-Oxlade My Money, My Choices www.gailvazoxlade.com · Money Mentors www.moneymentors.ca/ · Money

Seldin, Jonathan P.

350

Training Needs Assessment Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The TNA PowerPoint Presentation is targeted for the training points of contacts whose organization's participate in the DOE training needs assessment (TNA). This presentation goes over how the training needs assessment (TNA) is done and the components of the TNA data collection tool.

351

Scientific Poster Presentations  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Creating Scientific Poster Presentations Visual Rhetoric/Visual Literacy Series Overview: What go into constructing or manipulating an image. Definition of Genre: Scientific poster presentations proceedings. Keep text between 700 and 800 words for a standard 3-foot-by-5-foot poster. This amount of text

Ferrari, Silvia

352

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Year 5/13-5/14 2003 Year 5/13-5/14 2003 Jim Irby MIT-PSFC 5 Year 5/13-5/14 2003 Outline * Alcator C-Mod Facility * Recent accomplishments - Mods/Upgrades - Inspections - MIT Support * Five Year Plan - Upgrades - Data system - Diagnostics * Statistics * Summary 5 Year 5/13-5/14 2003 Alcator C-Mod Facility Power Sources * 13.8 kV, 24 MVA line from NSTAR - Alternator drive - ICRF transmitters - LH sources - EFC, EF2 magnets * Alternator - 125 ton, 4 pole rotor - 1800 RPM - 2 GJ stored energy (72 ton flywheel) - 200 MW loads with 500 MJ extracted 5 Year 5/13-5/14 2003 5 Year 5/13-5/14 2003 ICRF Systems * 2 transmitters at 80 MHz, 2 MW CW each * 2 transmitters tunable from 40 to 80 MHz, 2 MW CW each * 2 two-strap antennas, 1.5 MW each * 1 four-strap antenna, 3 MW 5 Year 5/13-5/14 2003 Other Major Systems * 11 power supplies power 14 magnets

353

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Topic Group Summary Topic Group Summary Presented to: Transportation External Coordination Working Group Presented by: Presented by: Dan King, Oneida Nation, Tribal Topic Group Member Dan King, Oneida Nation, Tribal Topic Group Member April 5, 2005, Spring 2005 April 5, 2005, Spring 2005 Phoenix, AZ Phoenix, AZ 2 Funding Issues - Considerations * Examination of overlapping jurisdictions * Reconsider half-mile limit * Include all public safety officials in training * Ongoing training - turnover of personnel * Recovery of money spent responding to accidents * Cultural resources cannot be replaced - used to sustain communities 3 Funding Issues - Recommendations * Lessons Learned from Department of Homeland Security * Provide direct funding to Tribes * Create simple application process * Appoint Tribal representatives on application

354

Publications and Presentations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Publications and Presentations Publications and Presentations News & Publications ESnet in the News ESnet News Publications and Presentations Galleries ESnet Awards and Honors Contact Us Technical Assistance: 1 800-33-ESnet (Inside the US) 1 800-333-7638 (Inside the US) 1 510-486-7600 (Globally) 1 510-486-7607 (Globally) Report Network Problems: trouble@es.net Provide Web Site Feedback: info@es.net Publications and Presentations Sort by: Date | Author | Type 2013 Dart E., Rotman L., Tierney B., Hester M., and Zurawski J., "The Science DMZ: A Network Design Pattern for Data-Intensive Science", IEEE/ACM Annual SuperComputing Conference (SC13), Denver CO, USA, November 19, 2013, LBNL LBNL-6366E Download File: sc13sciDMZ-final.pdf (pdf: 952 KB) Ezra Kissel, Martin Swany, Brian Tierney and Eric Pouyoul, "Efficient

355

ARM - 2008 STM Presentations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Presentations Presentations 2008 Meeting 2008 Meeting Home Proceedings Sorted by Author Proceedings Sorted by Title Pictures Posters Presentations Meeting Archives ARM Science Team Meeting Proceedings Past Science Team Meetings 2008 STM Presentations Monday, March 10 ARM Orientation for New and Current PIs Chief Scientist's Perspective (PDF, 5.7MB) Warren Wiscombe ARM Instruments (PDF, 14.7MB) Jimmy Voyles Infrastructure (PDF, 643KB) Jim Mather How to Get Data (PDF, 2MB) Raymond McCord Working Group Sessions Cloud Modeling Working Group 2008 ARM STM Cloud Modeling Working Group Session Agenda (PDF, 11KB) Understanding and Improving CRM and GCM Simulations of Cloud Systems with ARM Observations (PDF, 272KB) Xiaoqing Wu and Qilong Min Interactions of Cumulus Convection and the Boundary Layer at the

356

Presentations | MMSNF 2013 Chicago  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Privacy and Security Notice Presentations Available Presentations from the Materials Modeling and Simulation of Nuclear Fuels (MMSNF) 2013 workshop. Presented on Presentation Title Authors Session Oct. 14, 2013 Welcome and announcements Ewing, Tom (ANL, USA) and Rosner, Robert (UC, USA) Opening Oct. 14, 2013 First-principles DFT+U modeling of paramagnetic UO2 and (U,Pu) mixed oxides [366KB, posted: Oct. 13, 2013 ] Dorado, Boris (CEA, DAM, DIF, France), Garcia, Philippe (CEA, DEN, DEC, France) Atomistic Models and Simulations Oct. 14, 2013 Computational study of energetics and defect-ordering tendencies for rare earth elements in uranium dioxide [1.5MB, posted: Oct. 28, 2013 ] Solomon, Jonathan M. (UC Berkeley, USA), Alexandrov, Vitaly (UC Berkeley, UC Davis, USA), Sadigh, Babak (LLNL, USA), Navrotsky, Alexandra (UC Davis, USA), Asta, Mark (UC Berkeley, UC Davis, USA) Atomistic Models and Simulations

357

NERSC Science Highlights Presentations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

User Surveys User Surveys HPC Requirements for Science HPC Workshop Reports NERSC Staff Publications & Presentations Journal Cover Stories Galleries Home » News & Publications » Publications & Reports » Science Highlights Presentations Science Highlights Presentations NERSC collects highlights of recent scientific work carried out by its users. If you are a user and have work that you would like us to highlight please send e-mail to consult@nersc.gov. December 2013 Presentation [PDF] Model Shows Arrangement of Proteins in Photosynthetic Membranes [Geissler] How Many Earths are There? [Petigura] Read more... IceCube is 2013 Physics Breakthrough of the Year [Gerhardt] Read more... Simulation Couples with Experiment to Boost Energy Research [Smith] Simulation Captures the Essence of Carbonate Crystallization [Whitelam]

358

Control the Present  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Control the Present Image of water sampling trip embarking downstream from Otowi Bridge onto the Rio Grande with text overlay of 'How does LANL minimize the impacts from ongoing...

359

Papers and Presentations - 2014  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and Presentations NIF&PS People In the News Press Kit S&TR Articles Contact LLNL Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 7000 East Avenue * Livermore, CA 94550 Operated by...

360

CFSES Blue Team Presentations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

take you to the slides used in the presentation. Constraints on the Magnitude and Rate of CO2 Dissolution at Bravo Dome Natural Gas Field Marc Hesse (May, 2014) Nanoscale...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "investigation planning presentation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Presentations for Industry  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Industrial energy managers, utilities, and energy management professionals can find online trainings and information dissemination at no-cost. AMO has provided these energy-saving strategies from leading manufacturing companies and energy experts through several different presentation series.

362

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Presented by: Larry Romine, DOE-RL Mike Swartz, CHPRC 2 Problem Statement On 1213, ten individuals working in Room 232 and 235A-3 of Building 234-5Z were potentially exposed...

363

Hydrogen Fuel Quality (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect

Jim Ohi of NREL's presentation on Hydrogen Fuel Quality at the 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation on May 15-18, 2007 in Arlington, Virginia.

Ohi, J.

2007-05-17T23:59:59.000Z

364

GIS TRANSFORMATIONS Conference Presentation  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

GIS TRANSFORMATIONS Conference Presentation Waldo Tobler Geography Department University, line, area, or field phenomena, then the sixteen common classes of transformation are: point -> point (scalar, vector, tensor) data, to obtain eighty distinct possible classes of transformation. The common

Tobler, Waldo

365

California Commissioning Collaborative: 2007 Program Plan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Commissioning Collaborative: 2007 Program Plan Presented by: Jim Parks, Chair CCC Board of Directors November 1, 2007 California Commissioning Collaborative California Commissioning Collaborative Mission and Organization Improve... and RCx as a strategy for meeting efficiency goals CCC projects provide support and resources California Commissioning Collaborative 2007 Program Plan Support for Retrocommissioning Programs Verification of Savings Retrocommissioning Market...

Parks, J.

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

366

Update on BNL's Solar Energy Research Plans  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Update on BNL's Solar Energy Research Plans Presented to CAC by Bob Lofaro January 12, 2012 #12;2 First, BP Solar is going out of business, but this will not impact BNL's plans for solar energy research! BP Solar will meet all of its contractual commitments with regard to supporting BNL's solar energy

Homes, Christopher C.

367

Supplement to The Imnaha Subbasin Plan Introduction  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

2004 draft Imnaha Subbasin Assessment and Imnaha Subbasin Management Plan (available at www in these documents. This supplement was reviewed by the Imnaha Technical and Planning Teams during the fall of 2004. This supplement is presented in four sections that correspond to information requested by the Northwest Power

368

Resource assessment/commercialization planning meeting  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Department of Energy, Division of Geothermal Energy and Division of Geothermal Resource Management, sponsored a Resource Assessment/Commercialization Planning meeting in Salt Lake City on January 21-24, 1980. The meeting included presentations by state planning and resource teams from all DOE regions. An estimated 130 people representing federal, state and local agencies, industry and private developers attended.

None

1980-01-24T23:59:59.000Z

369

Overview of the Hanford risk management plan  

SciTech Connect

The Project Hanford Management Contract called for the enhancement of site-wide decision processes, and development of a Hanford Risk Management Plan to adopt or develop a risk management system for the Hanford Site. This Plan provides a consistent foundation for Site issues and addresses site-wide management of risks of all types. It supports the Department of Energy planning and sitewide decision making policy. Added to this requirement is a risk performance report to characterize the risk management accomplishments. This paper presents the development of risk management within the context of work planning and performance. Also discussed are four risk elements which add value to the context.

Halverson, T.G.

1998-03-26T23:59:59.000Z

370

Plan - Data Management  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Plan Plan Data Management for Data Providers Click an arrow to follow the data management path of a data set from planning to curation. plan Overview plan Plan manage Manage archive Archive curation DAAC Curation Data Management Overview Plan Manage Archive DAAC Curation Related Links DAAC Help Best Practices PDF Workshops DataONE ESIP Data Management Plans NASA's Terrestrial Ecology Program now requires that each proposal include a Data Management Plan (DMP) of up to two pages. A DMP for a proposal is a brief document that outlines what you will do with your data during and after your research, to ensure your data will be safe, documented, and accessible now and in the future. A DMP - developed early and used throughout the research project - will increase research efficiency by making the data understandable and usable in the future and

371

Guidance for Planning Exercises  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Planning, Conducting and Evaluating for Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Transportation Emergency Preparedness Tabletops, Drills and Exercises Prepared for the Department of Energy Office of Transportation and Emergency Management 02B00215-10.p65 This page intentionally left blank table of contents Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program (TEPP) planning tools planning tools Guidance f Guidance f Guidance f Guidance f Guidance for Planning, Conducting and Ev or Planning, Conducting and Ev or Planning, Conducting and Ev or Planning, Conducting and Ev or Planning, Conducting and Evaluating aluating aluating aluating aluating T T T T Tr r r r ransportation Emer ansportation Emer ansportation Emer ansportation Emer ansportation Emergenc genc genc genc gency Pr y Pr y Pr y Pr y Prepar epar epar epar eparedness T

372

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: State Implementation Plans  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

State Implementation Plans State Implementation Plans State Implementation Plans are a policy vehicle that allow states and municipalities to receive emission reduction credit for wind power purchases. Under guidance issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in August 2004, States and municipalities can receive emission reduction credit in their State Implementation Plans for wind power purchases that reduce air emissions and help achieve attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for ozone. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory has developed model State Implementation Plan documentation to assist states in achieving this objective. For more information on State Implementation Plans, please see the following publications. Improving Regional Air Quality with Wind Power: Presentation

373

Savannah River Site's Site Specific Plan  

SciTech Connect

This Site Specific Plan (SSP) has been prepared by the Savannah River Site (SRS) in order to show the Environmental Restoration and Waste Management activities that were identified during the preparation of the Department of Energy-Headquarters (DOE-HQ) Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Five-Year Plan (FYP) for FY 1992--1996. The SSP has been prepared in accordance with guidance received from DOE-HQ. DOE-SR is accountable to DOE-HQ for the implementation of this plan. The purpose of the SSP is to develop a baseline for policy, budget, and schedules for the DOE Environmental Restoration and Waste Management activities. The plan explains accomplishments since the Fiscal Year (FY) 1990 plan, demonstrates how present and future activities are prioritized, identifies currently funded activities and activities that are planned to be funded in the upcoming fiscal year, and describes future activities that SRS is considering.

Not Available

1991-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

374

Meeting Notes and Presentations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Board Notes and Slides Board Notes and Slides Notes from EM Corporate QA Board Tele-Conference - February 22, 2010 1 of 2 General: Attendance of voting board members was documented. All members were present or had a representative present on the call. Previous 5 Focus Areas: Dave Tuttel presented the proposed closeout of the previous 5 focus areas for the EM Corporate Board. * Focus Area 1 (Requirements Flow Down) - Board voted to close the focus area (unanimous) * Focus Area 2 (Adequate NQA-1 Suppliers) - Board voted to close the focus area (unanimous) * Focus Area 3 (CGI and Services Dedication) - Board voted to close the focus area (unanimous) * Focus Area 4 (Graded Approach to QA) -Discussion noted that the area as a whole may need more work in the future focus areas even though the procurement piece is ready to close out. The discussion also noted

375

Microsoft Word - prjct planning  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Planning Checklist Planning Checklist The following checklist is intended to provide system owners, project managers, and other information system development and maintenance professionals with guidance in identifying and preparing project planning activities. The checklist reflects recognized project planning activities to be performed throughout the information systems project life cycle. Project planning is generally characterized as a process for selecting the strategies, policies, programs, and procedures for achieving the objectives and goals of the project. The objectives of project planning for information systems projects are summarized as the following: C User's environment is analyzed. C Project objectives and scope are defined. C High-level functional requirements are estimated.

376

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transportation External Coordination Working Group Transportation External Coordination Working Group Presented by: Presented by: Jay Jones Jay Jones Office of National Transportation Office of National Transportation September 21, 2005 September 21, 2005 Pueblo, CO Pueblo, CO Tribal Topic Group Update 2 Summary * 2005 Tribal program priorities * Key Transportation External Coordination Tribal (TEC) Topic Group topics * TEC Tribal Topic Group meetings update * TEC Tribal Topic Group recommendations * Next steps -Tribal interaction approaches 3 2005 Tribal Program Priorities * Initiate consultation with Native American Tribes along potential transportation corridors Issue notification letter Contact Tribal leaders regarding notification letter - Begin holding discussions and/or meetings with Tribal

377

NREL Variability Analysis for the Western Interconnect (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect

This presentation investigates the effects of several Energy Imbalance Markets implementations in the Western Interconnect.

Milligan, M.; Kirby, B.; King, J.

2011-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

378

Data Analysis for ARRA Early Fuel Cell Market Demonstrations (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect

Presentation about ARRA Early Fuel Cell Market Demonstrations, including an overview of the ARRE Fuel Cell Project, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's data analysis objectives, deployment composite data products, and planned analyses.

Kurtz, J.; Wipke, K.; Sprik, S.; Ramsden, T.

2010-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

379

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Engineering at Engineering at Fermilab Maurice Ball Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Summer Student Lecture Series June 11, 2013 f Fermilab Einstein Once Said....... * "Scientists investigate that which already is; Engineers create that which has never been." - Albert Einstein, Physicist. f Fermilab Outline * Introduction * What is Engineering? * What is Mechanical Engineering? * What is Fermilab? * Where/How are Mechanical Engineers Used at Fermilab * Summary * Closing Thought f Fermilab What is Engineering? * Engineering is the discipline, art, skill and profession of acquiring and applying scientific, mathematical, economic, social, and practical knowledge, in order to design and build

380

Tribal Strategic Energy Plan and Planning Handbook  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Tribal Strategic Energy Plan and Planning Handbook, published by the DOE Office of Indian Energy, is a tool for Tribes to use to help achieve energy goals in both the near- and long-term. This Handbook intends to help tribal leaders and community members define their unique energy goals and priorities through stakeholder input, dialog, and consensus-building.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "investigation planning presentation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Marketing Plan for Transmission Planning Services  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

not specifically related to transmission planning and not to outside companies who may require the help in transmission planning. It is essential that we take the market opportunity that currently exists to expand our services to our existing and new clients...

Tu, Linh

2006-12-15T23:59:59.000Z

382

Fraud Awareness Short Presentation  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Fraud Awareness Overview A Short Presentation From Your Internal Audit Department With assistance from the Office of the State Controller and the EAGLE Training Team #12;What is Fraud? #12;#12;What are some examples of fraud? #12;#12;Who commits fraud and why? #12;Management Manipulation

Howitt, Ivan

383

Ethics & Integrity Presented by  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Ethics & Integrity Presented by Chris Loschiavo Assistant Dean and Director Student Conduct · Ethics Activity · Introduction to Ethics · Case Studies · Conclusions/ Questions #12;UF Student Code;Introduction to Ethics #12;Defining the Term "Ethics" · The term "ethics" comes from the Latin word "ethica

Roy, Subrata

384

Presented by Information Fusion  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Presented by Information Fusion: Science and Engineering of Combining Information from Multiple's Office of Science #12;2 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Rao_InfoFusion_SC10 Information Fusion at ORNL � ORNL Instrumental in formulating and fostering this multi-disciplinary area

385

Architecture Overview Presented  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Pentium Pro Architecture Overview Presented by David T.Wang #12; ``New'' To the 80x86 world and 1 MIS . PatchableMicrocode . fetches past unresolved branches based on prediction . large register past unresolved branches are also executed speculatively. #12; Retirement . uops recombined at ROB

Jacob, Bruce

386

An assessment of presentism  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

that no past or future things exist now. Socrates does not now exist, though he did in the past; my future daughter does not now exist, though she may in the future. Ontologically, the present is distinct, serving to demarcate all that currently has existence...

McDaniel, Brannon David

2004-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

387

Programme, Abstracts, Presentations & Proceedings  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Programme, Abstracts, Presentations & Proceedings 24th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference October 8. #12;QR Codes for Smartphone Conference App Scan relevant QR to download the conference app QR code for Android QR code for iPhone The Conference4me application provides a digital, mobile copy of the confer

388

Accident Investigations  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This Order prescribes organizational responsibilities, authorities, and requirements for conducting investigations of certain accidents occurring at DOE sites, facilities, areas, operations, and activities.

2011-03-04T23:59:59.000Z

389

Sampling and analysis plan for volatile organic compounds in storm drain for the Upper East Fork Poplar Creek characterization area remedial investigation at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

SciTech Connect

The Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant, located within the Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR), is owned by the US Department of Energy and managed by Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. The Y-12 Plant is one of three major facilities on the ORR. The ORR contains both hazardous- and mixed-waste sites that are subject to regulations promulgated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986. Under RCRA guidelines and requirements from the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, the Y-12 Plant initiated investigation and monitoring of various sites within its boundaries in the mid-1980s. The entire ORR was placed on the National Priorities List of CERCLA sites in November 1989. Following CERCLA guidelines, sites under investigation require a remedial investigation (RI) to define the nature and extent of contamination, evaluate the risks to public health and the environment, and determine the goals for a feasibility study (FS) of potential remedial actions.

NONE

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

390

Training Plan | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Training Plan Training Plan This template is used to define the plan, scope, environment, roles and responsibilities for training needs for systemsoftware development and...

391

Green Development Plan  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The Ninth Five-Year Plan introduced two changes: the economic system will change from a traditional planned economy to a socialist market economy; and the economic growth mode will change from extensive to int...

Angang Hu

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

392

Motion Planning Jana Kosecka  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Slides thanks to http://cs.cmu.edu/~motionplanning, Jyh-Ming Lien Hard Motion Planning · Configuration Geometric Models S Sampling Based Motion Planner Discrete Search C-space planning Idea : Generate random

Kosecka, Jana

393

RM Capital Investment Plans  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Capital Investment Plans FY 2004 (568kb pdf) FY 2005 (625kb pdf) FY 2006 (625kb pdf) FY 2007 (1.45mb pdf) Meter policy Capital Investment Plans...

394

Decommissioning Plan RM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Decommissioning Plan Review (DPR) Module is a tool that assists DOE federal project review teams in evaluating the adequacy of the decommissioning plan prior to approval of the associated CD.

395

Sustainabiliity Sustainability Plan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Sustainabiliity IIT Campus Sustainability Plan 2010­2020 Published Fall Semester 2010 www.iit.edu/campus_sustainability #12;IIT Campus Sustainability Plan 2010-2020 Fall Semester 2010 1 Section I: Background Sustainability ...................................................................................................................................................................8 IIT Academic Entities on Sustainability

Heller, Barbara

396

Virginia Energy Plan (Virginia)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The 2010 Virginia Energy Plan affirms the state's support for the development of renewable energy. The Plan assesses the states energy picture through an examination of the states primary energy...

397

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Laboratory Mentor-Protégé Program Business Success Stories Presented by Cassandra McGee Stuart ORNL Small Business Programs Office May 23, 2013 2 Presentation name Today, ORNL is DOE's largest science and energy laboratory 2 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy $1.65B budget World's most intense neutron source 4,400 employees World-class research reactor 3,000 research guests annually $500M modernization investment Nation's largest materials research portfolio Most powerful open scientific computing facility Nation's most diverse energy portfolio Managing billion-dollar U.S. ITER project 3 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle, LLC * A 65-year relationship with DOE

398

Presentations & Testimony  

Office of Science (SC) Website

presentations-and-testimony/ The Office of presentations-and-testimony/ The Office of Science is the single largest supporter of basic research in the physical sciences in the United States, providing more than 40 percent of total funding for this vital area of national importance. It oversees - and is the principal federal funding agency of - the Nation's research programs in high-energy physics, nuclear physics, and fusion energy sciences. en {C6485D5D-3C27-4B21-961B-5075074695E9}http://science.energy.gov/~/media/sc-1/pdf/2013/103013_dehmer_csst.pdf Statement of the Acting Director of the Office of Science, Patricia Dehmer to the House Science, Space and Technology Committee Subcommittee on Energy The Office of Science's Role in Providing Tools for Scientific Discovery and Basic Energy Research. Wed, 30 Oct 2013 00:00:00 -0400

399

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program: Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program: Geologic Sequestration and Injection of Carbon Dioxide Mark de Figueiredo Climate Change Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Presentation for: DOE/NETL Carbon Storage Program Infrastructure Annual Review Meeting November 15, 2011 Outline * Background of Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program * Summary of Subpart UU (Injection of CO 2 ) * Summary of Subpart RR (Geologic Sequestration of CO 2 ) 2 This presentation is provided solely for informational purposes. It does not provide legal advice, have legally binding effect, or expressly or implicitly create, expand, or limit any legal rights, obligations, responsibilities, expectations, or benefits in regard to any person. Background of GHG Reporting Program * In response to the FY2008 Consolidated Appropriations Act, EPA

400

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

This presentation was given for the This presentation was given for the Navigant Research Webinar on Fast DC Charging for Electric Vehicles * http://www.navigantresearch.com/webinar/fast-dc-charging-for-electric-vehicles * April 9, 2013 1 Lessons Learned on the EV Project and DC Fast Charging Garrett Beauregard Executive Vice President and General Manager, eTec Labs April 9, 2013 ECOtality Company Overview Leading Hardware, Software and R&D for electric transportation Diversified revenue base of 3 complementary business segments Blink * Residential, public & commercial EV charging solutions * Contracted by U.S. Dept. of Energy for The EV Project (~$115M) * Over 11,000 chargers installed as of April 2013 Minit-Charger * Fast charging electric material handling and ground support equipment

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "investigation planning presentation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

FWP-FEW0174 - Task 5 Presenter: Megan Smith PI: Susan Carroll Yue Hao U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Building the Infrastructure for CO 2 Storage August 20-22, 2013 This work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 2 Presentation Outline  Benefit to Program  Project Overview  Technical Status  Accomplishments  Summary  Appendix Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 3 Benefit to the Program  This research project quantifies relationships between fluid flow, heterogeneity, and reaction rates specific to

402

MDM Tech Day Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Mega Project Mega Project Risk Analysis Model Oak Ridge Tennessee November 5, 2009 2 Content - Objectives - Risk Assessment Approach - Nuclear Risk Assessment Model Overview - Lessons Learned 3 Objectives ■ Present a new approach to analyzing risks of large and complex projects that may be directly applied to DOE ■ Discuss an example of how this methodology was recently used in a nuclear project, and how this can fit DOE's unique challenges ■ Present the benefits of using a risk assessment for protecting the government's interests and reduce risk exposure 4 Content - Objectives - Risk Assessment Approach - Nuclear Risk Assessment Model Overview - Lessons Learned 5 Approach to risk assessment follows a logical progression of risk identification, impact, and mitigation analysis Risk

403

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Administration FAA Air Traffic Organization Presented to: Department of Energy Presented by: Mark DeNicuolo, Manager, Performance & Analyses, FAA ATO Safety and Technical Training Date: September 20, 2012 Safety Management 2 * Approximately 50,000 flights per day * En Route centers handle 40.5 million aircraft per year * FAA/contract towers handle: - 51.2 million airport operations - 39 million instrument operations * 732 million passenger enplanements * Over 5,000 civil, public-use airports * Approximately 33,300 ATO employees - More than 15,000 air traffic controllers - More than 7,000 technicians and engineers * 21 ARTCCs, 513 ATCTs, 17 FSSs, 3 AFSSs National Airspace System (NAS) 3 Discipline Domains En Route Terminal FSS Support NDP Totals

404

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Evolution of Risk Management at NASA in Evolution of Risk Management at NASA in the Context of Achieving Adequate Safety Presented at the DOE 2012 Nuclear Safety Workshop Bethesda, Maryland September 20, 2012 Homayoon Dezfuli, Ph.D. NASA Technical Fellow for System Safety Office of Safety and Mission Assurance NASA Headquarters Outline * Historical Perspective on NASA Risk Management (RM) * RM Approach After 2008 * Future Direction of RM at NASA - The Concept of "Adequate Safety" - The Issue of Risk Analysis Completeness (Rationale for Future Trends in RM) * Summary 2 Acknowledgments This presentation is partly derived from the following sources: 3 NASA NPR 8000.4A NASA/SP-2010-576 NASA/SP-2011-3422 NASA/SP-2010-580 Historical Perspective on NASA Risk

405

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LL-WCI-U-2011-522763 Monthly Performance Review Director's Office March 21, 2008 Monthly Performance Weapons and Complex Integration (WCI) High Energy Density Experiments on NIF in FY2011 (A Joint WCI-NIF Success) Presented to SEAB Oct. 12, 2011 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by

406

Major results of geophysical investigations at Yucca Mountain and vicinity, southern Nevada  

SciTech Connect

In the consideration of Yucca Mountain as a possible site for storing high level nuclear waste, a number of geologic concerns have been suggested for study by the National Academy of Sciences which include: (1) natural geologic and geochemical barriers, (2) possible future fluctuations in the water table that might flood a mined underground repository, (3) tectonic stability, and (4) considerations of shaking such as might be caused by nearby earthquakes or possible volcanic eruptions. This volume represents the third part of an overall plan of geophysical investigation of Yucca Mountain, preceded by the Site Characterization Plan (SCP; dated 1988) and the report referred to as the Geophysical White Paper, Phase 1, entitled Status of Data, Major Results, and Plans for Geophysical Activities, Yucca Mountain Project (Oliver and others, 1990). The SCP necessarily contained uncertainty about applicability and accuracy of methods then untried in the Yucca Mountain volcano-tectonic setting, and the White Paper, Phase 1, focused on summarization of survey coverage, data quality, and applicability of results. For the most part, it did not present data or interpretation. The important distinction of the current volume lies in presentation of data, results, and interpretations of selected geophysical methods used in characterization activities at Yucca Mountain. Chapters are included on the following: gravity investigations; magnetic investigations; regional magnetotelluric investigations; seismic refraction investigations; seismic reflection investigations; teleseismic investigations; regional thermal setting; stress measurements; and integration of methods and conclusions. 8 refs., 60 figs., 2 tabs.

Oliver, H.W.; Ponce, D.A. [eds.] [Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA (United States); Hunter, W.C. [ed.] [Geological Survey, Denver, CO (United States). Yucca Mountain Project Branch

1995-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

407

2030 OCARTS Plan Report  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

2030 OCARTS PLAN REPORT Oklahoma City Area Regional Transportation Study Adopted by the Intermodal Transportation Policy Committee and Endorsed by the Board of Directors of the Association... entitled Planning for 2030: Oklahoma City Area Regional Transportation Study and the Technical Supplement to the Plan Report are companion pieces to this document. The Plan brochure was developed to provide an overview of both the development process...

Association of Central Oklahoma Governments

408

NHMFL Emergency Action Plan  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

NATIONAL HIGH MAGNETIC FIELD LABORATORY NHMFL FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY SAFETY PROCEDURE SP-3 TITLE: EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN ...

409

Academic Planning Council Minutes November 9, 2010  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Academic Planning Council Minutes November 9, 2010 Present: Molly Jahn (Chair), Nick Balster, Brian part of the guidelines document concerns the review/evaluation process to determine the continued merit

410

A Green Energy Plan for Denmark  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This note presents the main results from a research project, in the Department of Development and Planning at Aalborg University. More detailed information of the full study is given in (Lund 1996: 2) and (Lund 1...

Henrik Lund

1999-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

411

Massachusetts state airport system plan forecasts.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This report is a first step toward updating the forecasts contained in the 1973 Massachusetts State System Plan. It begins with a presentation of the forecasting techniques currently available; it surveys and appraises the ...

Mathaisel, Dennis F. X.

412

Motion Planning Jana Kosecka  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1 Motion Planning Jana Kosecka Department of Computer Science · Discrete planning, graph search://cs.cmu.edu/~motionplanning, Jyh-Ming Lien State space · Set of all possible states is represented as graph · Nodes states, links planning ­ generate a set of actions, if the solution exists it must be found in the finite time · Search

Kosecka, Jana

413

Bicycle Master Plan Acknowledgments  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Bicycle Master Plan #12;Acknowledgments Many people contributed to the development of the APU Bicycle Master Plan by providing valuable input, comments and review of the document. Different departments of APU will have to work together to implement the plan and to further encourage bicycling

Scheel, David

414

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Budget and TYCP Process Budget and TYCP Process Discussion Bob Harris UGP Regional Manager and PM 1 Preliminary 10-Year Capital Budget/Funding Establish Programmatic Asset Management/Capital Funding Process Asset Management Customer Networking Sustainable Funding Discussion Utilize Programmatic Asset Management/Capital Funding AMPIP WESTERN'S ROADMAP ROBUST ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM/WESTERN-WIDE CAPITAL BUDGET 2013 2014 NOV MAY ... ... ... 2 Rates Presentation Jack Murray DSW Rates Manager 3 P-DP Rate Discussion * Transmission rates experiencing long-term upward pressure. * Cost of rebuilding aging infrastructure a key component responsible for potential rate increases. * As additional plant completed and placed in service, annual costs to service debt increase,

415

P9 Summary Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Learned Learned WTP Prototypic Mixing and Sampling System Vijay Jain Manager, Research & Technology (Vitrification) May 18-21, 2009 Waste Treatment & Immobilization Plant Project Presented at EM-21 Technical Exchange Denver, CO Jain 04102009 2 Outline Background Test requirements and system design Test status Technical issues during testing Test results Summary Jain 04102009 3 Highlights Testing system is prototypic Major technical and design issues resolved LAW report (3 simulants) - issued HLW & LAW tests - complete Data analyses - 08/09 Reports - 12/09 Jain 04102009 4 Background Compliance to waste specifications is critical to the success of WTP vitrification operations: - Mixing and sampling of waste and melter feed is an integral part

416

Meeting and Presentation Materials  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1) Agenda 2) Presentations: a. Welcome, Agenda and any High Priority Issues b. Issuance of DOE O 414.1D - How it Affects EM Sites c. EM Commercial Grade Dedication Guide d. Integration of QA in Design Guidance Document e. Draft Revision to the Standard QA Contract Language f. Operational Awareness - Basic QA Profile Associated with EM Hazard Category 2 and 3 Nuclear Operations g. EFCOG Current Efforts & Relationship to the EM QA Corporate Board Priorities & Focus Areas 3) Commercial Grade Dedication Guidance Document 4) Integration of QA in Design Guidance Document 5) Draft Revision to Standard QA Contract Language 6) Status of Actions from the February 2011 Board Meeting

417

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fleet Card Program Review Fleet Card Program Review Presented to: U.S. Department of Energy Wright Express Corporation June 25, 2012 2012 Wright Express Corporation. Confidential & Proprietary. 1 2012 Wright Express Corporation. Confidential & Proprietary. 2 Table of Contents I. Wright Express Fleet Card I. Program Statistics II. What's New II. Questions? 2012 Wright Express Corporation. Confidential & Proprietary. 3 Program Statistics 2012 Wright Express Corporation. Confidential & Proprietary. 4 Portfolio Snapshot * 13 Month Overview Month Total Gross Dollars Total Transactions Total Unleaded Gallons Total Unleaded Dollars Total Diesel Gallons Total Diesel Dollars Total Gallons (all Fuel) Total Non-Fuel Transactions Total Non-Fuel Dollars Total Cards

418

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

IOGCC/SSEB PTTF REPORT IOGCC/SSEB PTTF REPORT THE PIPELINE PROJECT: Analysis of potential pipeline infrastructure, transportation & storage of CO 2 Presented at DOE's Carbon Storage Program Infrastructure Annual Review Meeting Nov. 15, 2011 Acknowledgement * This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy's National Energy Technology Laboratory. The Report Four sections: 1. Overview 2. Background 3. Analysis 4. Recommendations PART 1: OVERVIEW * Pipeline Transportation Task Force * Collaborative Work Group Model * Task Force Objectives IOGCC-SSEB CO 2 Pipeline Transportation Task Force (PTTF) * Offshoot of IOGCC's Carbon Capture and Geologic Storage Task Force * Southeast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership Focus Area * Collaboration: Task Force Composition

419

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and Validating Ternary Pd Alloys and Validating Ternary Pd Alloys Designing and Validating Ternary Pd Alloys for Optimum Sulfur/Carbon Resistance for Optimum Sulfur/Carbon Resistance in Hydrogen Separation in Hydrogen Separation and Carbon Capture Membrane Systems and Carbon Capture Membrane Systems Using High Using High - - Throughput Combinatorial Methods Throughput Combinatorial Methods Dan Henkel Rick kleiner November 12, 2009 This presentation does not contain any proprietary or confidential information 2 Participating Organizations Pall Corporation Pall Cortland Research and Development (PRDC) Cornell University Cornell Center for Materials Research (CCMR) Georgia Institute of Technology Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Temperature Materials Lab (HTML)

420

Presentation title goes here  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Future of DR Future of DR March 3, 2011 Sila Kiliccote, Mary Ann Piette, Dave Watson, Rish Ghatikar Deputy, DRRC Program Manager, LBNL SKiliccote@lbl.gov 2 Presentation Overview * Trends * Policy * Technology * Implementations * Load As Resource in Ancillary Services Markets * Future directions towards responsive buildings 3 Trends Policy Dynamic Rates - Large C&I, residential, small commercial Codes and Standards -Title 24, US Green Building Council's LEED Credits Smart Grid Standards effort Ancillary Services Technology Integration of Renewables Energy Storage Technologies - Can DR replace storage? PHEVs and EVs Implementation Linking Energy Efficiency and DR Utility Implementations Smart Grid Investment and Demonstration Grants 4 Demand Side Management and Automated DR Future

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "investigation planning presentation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

China China Energy Statistics 2012 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory The LBNL China Energy Group The China Energy Group at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) was established in 1988. Over the years the Group has gained recognition as an authoritative source of China energy statistics through the publication of its China Energy Databook (CED). The Group has published seven editions to date of the CED (http://china.lbl.gov/research/china- energy-databook). This handbook summarizes key statistics from the CED and is expressly modeled on the International Energy Agency's "Key World Energy Statistics" series of publications. The handbook contains timely, clearly-presented

422

Norms of Presentational Force  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

://www.americanforensics.org/uploaded-files/tc_41_3_w05.pdf. Open Access version: http://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/dspace/. 15 hope to illustrate the close connection between emotional appeal and premise adequacy. After arguing that the Declaration of Independence and Constitution secure...Innocenti Manolescu, Beth. "Norms of Presentational Force." Argumentation and Advocacy 41 (2005): 139-51. Official publishers version: http://www.americanforensics.org/uploaded-files/tc_41_3_w05.pdf. 1 Citation: Innocenti Manolescu, Beth...

Innocenti, Beth

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

423

FCC Lab Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Introduction to Introduction to Spectrum Engineering Julius Knapp, Chief Office of Engineering and Technology U.S. Federal Communications Commission Department of Energy Seminar on Spectrum Policy for the Utility Sector December 8, 2010 Note: The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author and may not necessarily represent the views of the Federal Communications Commission Why We Are Here: Utility Wireless Applications Use Spectrum Voice Dispatcher to Crews Crew to Crew Emergency Call "Talk Around" Interconnect Trunked Operation Mutual Aid/Interoperability Data: System Monitoring and Control, Reports and Status Messaging Telemetry, Protective Relaying SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) Automated Meter Reading Home Automation

424

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Market Monitoring Market Monitoring Tools Bernie Lesieutre - LBNL Bob Thomas - Cornell October 18, 2006 Washington, D.C. OE Visualization and Controls Peer Review Market Monitoring Tools: Overview Approach: Use dispatch, profit, revenue/offer price, withholding sensitivities to identify opportunities for local advantage that give some participants market power potential. 2006 Technical Work: Extend prior results to large, RTO-scale systems. Initiate large-scale analysis with RTO (PJM). Evaluate reactive power effects on energy markets. Publication and presentation of results. Market Power: Substitutability Market power boils down to the issue of substitutability Locational Advantage: "Load Pockets" Physical network constraints limit supply to certain loads, so that the incremental demand

425

LAC Regional Platform Workshop Presentations | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

LAC Regional Platform Workshop Presentations LAC Regional Platform Workshop Presentations Jump to: navigation, search LEDSGP Logo.png Advancing climate-resilient low emission development around the world Home About Tools Expert Assistance Events Publications Join Us LAC Workshop Announcement Agenda Participant Package Accommodations Location & Transportation Insurance & Visas Participants Presentations Outcomes Report Links Contact Us Introductory Remarks: LAC Regional Platform and Workshop and the LEDS GP Session Document Title LEDS GP slides for LAC Event.pdf LEDS GP Slides Interactive Session 1: Planning and Sustaining a LEDS Process Document Title Fernando Farias - 1aChilev1.pdf Making the Case for LEDS and Building Political Support: Chile on Engaging Ministries and Political Leaders Lupe Guinand - 2012 11 06 PlanCC Apoyo Político VA (2)rev.pdf Planning for Climate Change Project (PlanCC) - Promoviendo Estrategias de Desarrollo Bajas en Carbono (LEDS) en el Perú

426

Motion planning with sequential convex optimization and convex collision checking  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

We present a new optimization-based approach for robotic motion planning among obstacles. Like CHOMP (Covariant Hamiltonian Optimization for Motion Planning), our algorithm can be used to find collision-free trajectories from naïve, straight-line initializations ... Keywords: Motion planning, convex collision checking, sequential convex optimization, trajectory optimization

John Schulman, Yan Duan, Jonathan Ho, Alex Lee, Ibrahim Awwal, Henry Bradlow, Jia Pan, Sachin Patil, Ken Goldberg, Pieter Abbeel

2014-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

427

Draft 2014 Annual Plan | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Draft 2014 Annual Plan Draft 2014 Annual Plan Section 999: Draft 2014 Annual Plan Section 999 - Draft 2014 Annual Plan More Documents & Publications 2011 Annual Plan 2013...

428

100-D/H Remedial Investigation/ Feasibility Study /Proposed...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Remedial Investigation Feasibility Study Proposed Plan Nina Menard Washington State Department of Ecology 100-DH RIFSPP * Received Draft RIFSPP on December 14, 2012 *...

429

Long Range Campus Development Plan Implementation and Plan Phasing  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Long Range Campus Development Plan Implementation and Plan Phasing 55 Introduction Plan Review approach and the formal, regular review of the process of the Plan. MSU will revisit the Plan on a cyclical will continue to build upon and refine these fundamental elements and strategies. Recurring review of the Plan

Maxwell, Bruce D.

430

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Tolerance and Mechanical Properties of Tolerance and Mechanical Properties of Nanostructured Ceramic/Metal Composites Michael Nastasi Nebraska Center for Energy Sciences Research and Mechanical and Materials Engineering University of Nebraska-Lincoln Collaborators : UNL: Juan Colon Santana MIT: Mike Demkowicz , R. E. Baumer, Kan-Ju Lin TAMU: Lin Shao, Lloyd Price Work supported by DOE, NE, Nuclear Energy Enabling Technologies Presented at: Materials-Cross-Cut NEET Webinar August 20 th , 2013 Vacancies Interstitials Atomic defects produced by irradiation Embrittlement Defects that do NOT recombine aggregate into vacancy or interstitial clusters D.L. Porter and F. A. Garner, J. Nuclear Materials, 159, p. 114 (1988) D.J. Bacon and Y.N. Osetsky, Int. Mater. Rev., 47, p. 233 (2002).

431

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cleanup Project _____________________ September 21, 2005 FRR Rail Shipment to Idaho Presentation to the DOE Transportation External coordination Working Group (TEC) Mark R. Arenaz DOE-ID Idaho Cleanup Project U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office 2 DOE - Idaho Operations Office FRR Rail Shipment * Overview of Shipment * Operational Aspects * Emergency Response Preparation * Institutional Program * Route Determination * Lessons Learned * Pictures Idaho Cleanup Project U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office 3 Overview of Shipment * First shipment of Foreign Research Reactor (FRR) Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) * Spent Fuel originated in So. Korea * Transport by dedicated ship to Naval Weapons Station - Concord (NWSCo) * Transport by dedicated rail from NWSCo to Idaho National Laboratory Site

432

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Stirling A. Colgate has been a staff physicist at Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (1952-1965) Stirling A. Colgate has been a staff physicist at Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (1952-1965) and was a staff member at Los Alamos National Laboratory, [LANL] from 1976 to 1991 and from then to present has been an adjunct physicist at LANL. From 1965 through 1974 he was president of New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology. He was elected to the National Academy of Science in 1985. In 1990 he received the Rossi prize for work in astrophysics; having predicted in 1963 the emission of neutrinos from supernovae, recently observed from the nearby Supernovae 1987A. He is a Senior fellow at LANL, a Fellow of the American Physical Society, and co-shared the Los Alamos Medal. More important for this proposal is his experience in nuclear weapons, both design and

433

Title of Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A Process Approach to Management of Operational Cyber Security Risks Antione Manson, DHS Jim Cebula, CERT DOE Cyber Security Conference Atlanta - May 2010 2 NO WARRANTY THIS MATERIAL OF CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY AND ITS SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE IS FURNISHED ON AN -AS-IS" BASIS. CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY MAKES NO WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, AS TO ANY MATTER INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR PURPOSE OR MERCHANTABILITY, EXCLUSIVITY, OR RESULTS OBTAINED FROM USE OF THE MATERIAL. CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY DOES NOT MAKE ANY WARRANTY OF ANY KIND WITH RESPECT TO FREEDOM FROM PATENT, TRADEMARK, OR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT. Use of any trademarks in this presentation is not intended in any way to infringe on the rights of the

434

Oral Presentation Guidance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Revised 04/01/2011 Page 1 of 2 Revised 04/01/2011 Page 1 of 2 09 ORAL PRESENTATION GUIDANCE The following guidance is not intended to replace or circumvent any existing agency-level guidance or regulation; the guidance is intended to enhance the agency's effectiveness when interviewing potential Energy Service Company (ESCOs). NOTE: Use for down selection of two or more ESCOs INSTRUCTIONS * Preplan your interview(s) * Be prepared o Decide whether to have video conference; webinar, telephonically or face-to-face interview (recommended). o Meet with the Acquisition Team (including your DOE Project Facilitator) at least one hour prior to the first ESCO interview. o Prepare questions and discussion issues based on the Team's comments and concerns. * Be brief o Recommend scheduling a 1 or 1-1/2 hour for each interview.

435

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Bipolar Nickel Metal Hydride Battery Bipolar Nickel Metal Hydride Battery Development and Testing DOE ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS RESEARCH PROGRAM ANNUAL PEER REVIEW November 2 - 3, 2006, Washington, D.C. James Landi jlandi@electroenergyinc.com 203-797-2699 Program Objectives and Benefits  The objective of this program is to further develop the bipolar NiMH battery design to be used in high-energy and high-power energy storage applications. - Build and demonstrate large-format batteries - Demonstrate these batteries in present and future applications  The bipolar NiMH battery could provide the following benefits: - Improve efficiencies by reducing transmission peaking losses and shifting peak demands. - Reduce power and voltage sag to users. - Provide an efficient method to distribute backup energy/power

436

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

nd nd Energy & Innovation Conference November 28-29, 2012 Partnering for Innovation: Critical Materials Roe-Hoan Yoon, Lead Paul King, Business Development Critical Materials Strategic Growth Area NETL-Regional University Allience 2 o Critical: * Intrinsically rare, low grade, or currently unavailable in the United States. o Energy Critical Elements: * Chemical elements that are essential for the deployment of transformative energy technologies. Critical Materials-Definition 3 Application of Critical Materials 3 4  Short Term (present t - 2015) Criticality Matrix Your Logo  Mid Term (2015 - 2025) 5  Essential for the U.S. leading the 6 th wave of technology innovation o Renewable energy development o High-tech industry o Sustainability

437

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

We'd like to hear from you..." We'd like to hear from you..." "We'd like to hear from you..." * Encourage greater use of ARM data by the modeling community * Create highly polished datasets suitable for modelers * Possible future availability of statistical summaries for all standard ARM products (plots and/or datasets) * Possible future 'on the fly' calculation of statistical quantities, integrated into ARM archive interface The Purpose The Purpose This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by University of California Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract No. W-7405-Eng-48. CRL-POST-229191 We present a prototype statistical summary of ARM observations designed for use by climate modelers. LLNL developed this prototype as a way of obtaining

438

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

BOEM Lower 48 Assessment BOEM Lower 48 Assessment Matthew Frye BOEM - Herndon, VA 6 June 2013 Update on BOEM Lower 48 Assessment A presentation to the Methane Hydrate Advisory Committee Matthew Frye Resource Evaluation Division BOEM - Herndon, VA matt.frye@boem.gov 6 June 2013 BOEM Resource Evaluation Division gas hydrate webpage: http://www.boem.gov/Oil-and-Gas-Energy-Program/Resource- Evaluation/Gas-Hydrates/index.aspx Update on BOEM Lower 48 Assessment Matthew Frye BOEM - Herndon, VA 6 June 2013 Update on BOEM Lower 48 Assessment Matthew Frye BOEM - Herndon, VA 6 June 2013 Oil and Gas Production on the US OCS Reserve Estimation Exploratory & Development Well Drilling Lease / Tract Award ("fair market value determination")

439

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Implementation of Implementation of EPA's Class VI Geologic Sequestration Program Bruce Kobelski and Mary Rose Bayer Pittsburgh, PA November 15, 2011 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency UIC Program Background * 1974 Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA; reauthorized in 1996) - Federal regulations to ensure protection of Underground Sources of Drinking Water (USDWs) * USDWs are defined as - Any aquifer or portion of an aquifer that contains water that is less than 10,000 ppm total dissolved solids or contains a volume of water such that it is a present, or viable future source for a Public Water Supply System * The UIC Program regulates injection of all fluids - liquid, gas, or slurry - Some natural gas storage, oil and gas production, and hydraulic fracturing fluids are exempted

440

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Requirements Requirements for NERSC repository m327: "Parallel Simulation of Electron Cooling Physics and Beam Transport" Work supported by the US DOE Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics, including grant No.'s DE-FC02-07ER41499 and DE-SC0000835. Resources of NERSC were used. Workshop: Large Scale Computing and Storage Requirements for Nuclear Physics May 26, 2011 Presenter: D.L. Bruhwiler, 1 Contributors: B.T. Schwartz, 1 V.H. Ranjbar, 1 G.I. Bell 1 Other m327 users: J. Qiang, 4 S. White, 2 Y. Luo 2 Collaborators: R. Ryne, 4 V.N. Litvinenko, 2 W. Fischer, 2 G. Wang, 2 Y. Hao, 2 K. Paul, 1 I. Pogorelov 1 1. Tech-X Corporation 2. Brookhaven National Lab 3. Thomas Jefferson National Lab

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "investigation planning presentation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Utility-Scale Solar 2012 Utility-Scale Solar 2012 An Empirical Analysis of Project Cost, Performance, and Pricing Trends in the United States Mark Bolinger & Samantha Weaver Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory September 2013 1 This research was supported by funding from the U.S. Department of Energy's SunShot Initiative. Presentation Outline * Recent market growth has resulted in a critical mass of project-level data ripe for analysis * Key findings from this inaugural edition  Installed Costs/Prices  Operating (O&M) Costs  Performance (Capacity Factors)  Power Purchase Agreement ("PPA") Prices 2 A few background notes about this first edition: * Certain data (e.g., O&M costs) were still rather limited for this first edition, but are

442

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Cloud Life Cycle and Structure Cloud Life Cycle and Structure A.M. Vogelmann, E. Luke, M.P. Jensen, P. Kollias, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York and E.R. Boer LUEBEC, San Diego, CA SUMMARY SUMMARY * * Cloud tracking using geostationary satellite data provides a context of the cloud state observed at the ARM Sites, including the cloud's life-cycle stage and its representativeness of the region. * * Examples are presented of the duration and paths of mesoscale convective systems within the Tropical Western Pacific. * * This information will be used to interpret the cloud microphysical retrievals and overlap structure measured at the ARM sites. Reference Reference Boer, E. R., and V. Ramanathan, 1997: Lagrangian approach for deriving cloud characteristics from satellite observations and its implications to cloud

443

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ProActive DNS ProActive DNS Blacklisting Gene Rackow Argonne National Laboratory The Basics of DNS Hostname to IP mapping and back Host aliases Mail server locations Services Security records What is DNS Blacklisting? DNS Blacklist also known as a DNS Blackhole. Local server fakes zones know to contain: Malware Spyware Command/Control Advertising Political Issues What are DNS Blacklist Benefits Preventing hosts from getting to bad stuff. If you are not presented with the malware, Chances are you are not going to be infected. Estimates are that blocking Advertising sites stops 85% of infections. DNS Blacklist Sources of information Bad News about DNS Blacklisting Typically It's ReActive. Entries are added AFTER something happened. Some machines have already been

444

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

SEISMO-ACOUSTIC IMAGERY OF A SEISMO-ACOUSTIC IMAGERY OF A CARBONATE/HYDRATE MOUND IN THE GULF OF MEXICO Thomas McGee and Leonardo Macelloni Center for Marine Resources and Environmental Technology University of Mississippi Presented to the American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting San Francisco, California 11-15 December 2006 BACKGROUND INFORMATION In the northern Gulf of Mexico, hydrates outcrop within carbonate mounds precipitated by microbial action at sites of hydrocarbon venting from cold seeps. Such seeps are located along faults that act as pathways for fluids migrating upward from deep reservoirs. Location of MC118 The Gulf of Mexico Hydrate Research Consortium has begun to install a sea-floor observatory at such a mound in federal lease block Mississippi Canyon 118. Thanks for your attention.

445

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Nanostructured Electrode and Electrolyte Nanostructured Electrode and Electrolyte Development for Energy Storage Devices Presented by Karen Waldrip Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, NM Funded by the Energy Storage Systems Program of the U.S. Department Of Energy (DOE/ESS) and by the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program, and managed by Sandia National Laboratories (SNL). Sandia is a multi-program laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration, under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. - SNL, GINER, and ADA - Electrochemical Storage Program Reviews - Capacitor Development Activities D. Ingersoll, F.M. Delnick, and K.E. Waldrip Sandia National Laboratories PO Box 5800 Albuquerque, NM 87185-0614

446

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PUMP CANYON TEST SITE PUMP CANYON TEST SITE Prepared For: 2009 Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships Annual Review Meeting Prepared By: George J. Koperna, Jr. Advanced Resources International, Inc. Pittsburgh, November 16-19, 2009 1 1 2 RCSP SP111709 Presentation Outline * Introduction * Operations * Reservoir Characterization and Modeling * Monitoring, Verification and Accounting * Next Steps 3 RCSP SP111709 Objectives * Field-test the effectiveness of CO 2 sequestration in deep, unmineable coal seams via a small-scale geologic sequestration demonstration * Develop a better understanding of the efficacy of enhanced coalbed methane recovery processes via carbon dioxide injection (CO 2 -ECBM) into a pressure-depleted reservoir * Monitor plume migration to prevent any leakage 4 RCSP SP111709

447

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Ingersoll, F.M. Delnick, and K.E. Waldrip Ingersoll, F.M. Delnick, and K.E. Waldrip Sandia National Laboratories PO Box 5800 Albuquerque, NM 87185-0614 High Voltage Electrochemical Capacitor presented at EESAT 2007 September 23-27, 2007 PEER Review San Francisco, CA Sandia is a multi-program laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. 2 Objective * New Start - 7/07 * Increasing the energy of the system * Energy = 1/2 CV 2 * Four general means to increasing energy - Increased surface area - most common approach * A - active area of electrode - high surface area materials (carbon - typically > 1000 m 2 /g) - nanomaterials (e.g. carbon multiwalled nanotube) - Employ Faradaic processes -

448

PowerPoint Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NATIONAL CHAIRS MEETING NATIONAL CHAIRS MEETING Deer Creek State Park, Mt. Sterling, Ohio November 5-7, 2013 U.S. Department of Energy Practices Related to Public Input Presented by Greg Simonton Federal Coordinator Portsmouth SSAB EM SSAB NATIONAL CHAIRS MEETING Deer Creek State Park, Mt. Sterling, Ohio November 5-7, 2013 DOE Appreciation  The Department recognizes the members of the Site Specific Advisory Boards and Citizens Advisory Boards are volunteers and dedicate a lot of time to this work.  The Department also recognizes that members are asked to weigh in on complex and sometimes controversial issues that can have dramatic impacts on their communities.  The Department acknowledges that careful thought goes into recommendations and other input and that members bring a vital perspective to DOE operations.

449

PowerPoint Presentation  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Productivity Dispersion Productivity Dispersion Productivity Dispersion Productivity Dispersion and Input Prices: and Input Prices: The Case of Electricity The Case of Electricity Steven J. Davis - University of Chicago and NBER Cheryl Grim - U.S. Census Bureau John Haltiwanger - University of Maryland and NBER April 8, 2008 Disclaimer: This work is unofficial and thus has not undergone the review accorded to official U.S. Census Bureau publications. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Census Bureau. This presentation has been screened to ensure no confidential data are revealed. Background Background * Prior research (Davis and Haltiwanger, 2001) shows that it is important to consider aggregate and allocative effects of oil price shocks - Positive oil shocks have adverse aggregate effect

450

Oral Presentation Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revised 04/01/2011 Page 1 of 2 Revised 04/01/2011 Page 1 of 2 09 ORAL PRESENTATION GUIDANCE The following guidance is not intended to replace or circumvent any existing agency-level guidance or regulation; the guidance is intended to enhance the agency's effectiveness when interviewing potential Energy Service Company (ESCOs). NOTE: Use for down selection of two or more ESCOs INSTRUCTIONS * Preplan your interview(s) * Be prepared o Decide whether to have video conference; webinar, telephonically or face-to-face interview (recommended). o Meet with the Acquisition Team (including your DOE Project Facilitator) at least one hour prior to the first ESCO interview. o Prepare questions and discussion issues based on the Team's comments and concerns. * Be brief o Recommend scheduling a 1 or 1-1/2 hour for each interview.

451

Report: EM Strategic Planning  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

STRATEGIC PLANNING STRATEGIC PLANNING September 25, 2008 Submitted by the EMAB Strategic Planning Subcommittee Background In Fiscal Year (FY) 2008, the Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) was tasked to assess EM's strategic planning capabilities/processes and, in particular, to review the status of the initiatives pursued by the Office of Strategic Planning and Analysis (EM-32). This charge was derived from the Board's work pertaining to the topics of Discretionary Budgeting and Technical Uncertainty and Risk Reduction, which were addressed in previous reports and recommendations to the Assistant Secretary. The EMAB Strategic Planning Committee was formed to expand on this earlier work and pursue dialogues with the EM Office of Program Planning and Budget (EM-30) in

452

Operating plan FY 1998  

SciTech Connect

This document is the first edition of Argonne`s new Operating Plan. The Operating Plan complements the strategic planning in the Laboratory`s Institutional Plan by focusing on activities that are being pursued in the immediate fiscal year, FY 1998. It reflects planning that has been done to date, and it will serve in the future as a resource and a benchmark for understanding the Laboratory`s performance. The heart of the Institutional Plan is the set of major research initiatives that the Laboratory is proposing to implement in future years. In contrast, this Operating Plan focuses on Argonne`s ongoing R&D programs, along with cost-saving measures and other improvements being implemented in Laboratory support operations.

NONE

1997-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

453

Alaska Strategic Energy Plan and Planning Handbook  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Alaska Strategic Energy Alaska Strategic Energy Plan and Planning Handbook A. Dane and L. Doris National Renewable Energy Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy | Office of Indian Energy 1000 Independence Ave. SW, Washington DC 20585 | 202-586-1272 energy.gov/indianenergy | indianenergy@hq.doe.gov Alaska Strategic Energy Plan and Planning Handbook ii NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned

454

CHEMICAL HYGIENE PLAN HAZARD COMMUNICATION PLAN  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Risk Manager 2687 Hospital Quality Assurance 3153 Hospital Clinical Engineering 2954 Human Resources #12;5. CHEMICAL HYGIENE PLAN 5.1 General Standard Operating Procedures 5.1.1 General Rules 5

Oliver, Douglas L.

455

CHEMICAL HYGIENE PLAN HAZARD COMMUNICATION PLAN  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Department 2588 Hospital Risk Manager 2687 Hospital Quality Assurance 3153 Hospital Clinical Engineering 2954 #12;5. CHEMICAL HYGIENE PLAN 5.1 General Standard Operating Procedures 5.1.1 General Rules 5

Kim, Duck O.

456

Integrated Planning and Performance Management  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

management systems need clarification - Consolidated planning annual timetable needed for efficiency * Organizational rolesresponsibilities need alignment to defined planning...

457

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

974 1 974 1 Introducing SAM (Sun and Aureole Measurement), a New, Ground-based Capability for Measuring Cloud Optical Properties Presented to Cloud Properties Working Group IRF Working Group ARM Science Team Meeting John DeVore (devore@visidyne.com) A.T. Stair (ats@visidyne.com) Bob McClatchey 1 (RMcClatchey@msn.com) Visidyne, Inc. 781-273-2820 March 2006 1 Consultant VI-4974 2 Space-Based Sun-Tracking Zenith-Viewing Cirrus (Ice Columns) Solar elevation = 45 deg Sat depression = 45 deg Surface albedo = 0.2 10 +4 10 +2 10 +0 10 -2 550 nm Radiance (W/cm 2 /sr/μm) 0.1 1.0 100. 10. Optical Depth Space-Based Sun-Tracking Zenith-Viewing Cirrus (Ice Columns) Solar elevation = 45 deg Sat depression = 45 deg Surface albedo = 0.2 10 +4 10 +2 10 +0 10 -2 550 nm Radiance (W/cm 2 /sr/μm) 0.1 1.0 100. 10. Optical Depth

458

LCLS Undulator Quadrupole Fiducialization Plan  

SciTech Connect

This note presents the fiducialization plan for the LCLS undulator quadrupoles. The note begins by summarizing the requirements for the fiducialization. A discussion of the measurement equipment is presented, followed by the methods used to perform the fiducialization and check the results. This is followed by the detailed fiducialization plan in which each step is enumerated. Finally, the measurement results and data storage formats are presented. The LCLS is made up of 33 assemblies consisting of an undulator, quadrupole, beam finder wire, and other components mounted on a girder. The components must be mounted in such a way that the beam passes down the axis of each component. In this note, we describe how the ideal beam axis is related to tooling balls on the quadrupole. This step, called fiducialization, is necessary because the ideal beam axis is determined magnetically, whereas tangible objects must be used to locate the quadrupole. The note begins with the list of fiducialization requirements. The laboratory in which the work will be performed and the relevant equipment is then briefly described. This is followed by a discussion of the methods used to perform the fiducialization and the methods used to check the results. A detailed fiducialization plan is presented in which all the steps of fiducialization are enumerated. A discussion of the resulting data files and directory structure concludes the note.

Wolf, Zachary; Levashov, Michael; Lundahl, Eric; Reese, Ed; LeCocq, Catherine; Ruland, Robert; /SLAC; ,

2010-11-24T23:59:59.000Z

459

Audience/Panel Discussion: Sites Lesson Learned about Activity-level Work Planning and Control Using EFCOG Work Planning and Control Guideline  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Slide Presentation by Donna J. Governor, Deputy Dept Mgr for Planning & Integration, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory work planning and control lessons learned and audience/panel discussion on site's lessons learned about Activity-level Work Planning and Control using EFCOG Work Planning and Control Guideline Document.

460

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 406: Area 3 Building 03-74 and Building 03-58 Under ground Discharge Points and Corrective Action Unit 429: Area 3 Building 03-55 and Area 9 Building 09-52 Underground Discharge Points, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) has been developed in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) that was agreed to by the US Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office (DOE/NV); the State of Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP); and the US Department of Defense (FFACO, 1996). The CAIP is a document that provides or references all of the specific information for investigation activities associated with Corrective Action Units (CAUs) or Corrective Action Sites (CASs). According to the FFACO (1996), CASs are sites potentially requiring corrective action(s) and may include solid waste management units or individual disposal or release sites. Corrective Action Units consist of one or more CASs grouped together based on geography, technical similarity, or agency responsibility for the purpose of determining corrective actions. This CAIP contains the environmental sample collection objectives and the criteria for conducting site investigation activities at the Underground Discharge Points (UDPs) included in both CAU 406 and CAU 429. The CAUs are located in Area 3 and Area 9 of the Tonopah Test Range (TTR). The TTR, included in the Nellis Air Force Range, is approximately 255 kilometers (km) (140 miles [mi]) northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada.

DOE/NV

1999-05-20T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "investigation planning presentation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.