Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent verification contractor" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

ORISE: Independent verification  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Independent verification Independent verification ORISE techinician performs environmental scanning The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) performs independent environmental assessments and verification to determine the effectiveness of radiological cleanup at decontamination and decommissioning (D&D) projects across the United States. Since 1980, ORISE has performed independent verification at more than 500 sites in 42 states and the District of Columbia. As the primary independent verification contractor for all U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) cleanup projects and the only verification contractor for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), we validate that soil, water and structures are within established state and federal release criteria, and can be safely designated for public use.

2

Surveillance Guide - OPS 9.10 Independent Verification  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION 1.0 Objective The objective of this surveillance is to evaluate the conduct of selected independent verification activities. This surveillance provides a basis for evaluating the effectiveness of the contractor's independent verifications programs and for establishing compliance with DOE requirements. 2.0 References 2.1 DOE 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities 2.2 DOE-STD-1036-93, Guide to Good Practices for Independent Verification 3.0 Requirements Implemented This surveillance is conducted to implement requirements of the Functions, Responsibilities and Authorities Manual, Section 20, Operations, FRAM #s 4253, 4258, and 4261. These requirements are drawn from DOE 5480.19.

3

Lessons Learned from Independent Verification Activities | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

control after the property has been demonstrated to meet the Department's stringent radiation protection requirements. Lessons Learned from Independent Verification...

4

Independent Oversight Review, Department of Energy Contractor - August 2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Contractor - Department of Energy Contractor - August 2000 Independent Oversight Review, Department of Energy Contractor - August 2000 August 2000 Review of Department of Energy Contractor Occupational Medicine Programs from December 1998 to June 1999 The Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Oversight performed a two-phased review of eight Departmental contractor occupational medicine programs. The first phase of the review was completed in September 1998 and the second phase in December 1999. To conduct the review, Oversight teamed with the Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC), a non-profit accreditation organization for health-care facilities. The results of the second-phase review reflected many of those addressed in the interim report. Upon completion of the two-phased review, six of the

5

Lessons Learned from Independent Verification Activities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Demonstration Demonstration Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education - Independent Verification Lessons Learned IV - performed at nine DOE sites from 2004 to 2008 Page 1 of 2 Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education Multiple Sites Lessons Learned from Independent Verification Activities Challenge The Department of Energy clears property from radiological control after the property has been demonstrated to meet the Department's stringent radiation protection requirements. Radiological surveys are used to demonstrate compliance with the requirements. Independent verification (IV) activities are conducted by an independent third party as a quality check on radiological surveys procedures and practices. The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) performs independent verification for the Department. In this lessons learned report, ORISE summarizes their

6

Contractor  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

qperations Series listed elsewhere in this contract. The contractor shall use the Plan to manage and control the development of facilities and lands. All plans and...

7

INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION SURVEY REPORT FOR ZONE 1 OF THE EAST TENNESSEE TECHNOLOGY PARK IN OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU) conducted in-process inspections and independent verification (IV) surveys in support of DOE's remedial efforts in Zone 1 of East Tennessee Technology Park (ETTP) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Inspections concluded that the remediation contractor's soil removal and survey objectives were satisfied and the dynamic verification strategy (DVS) was implemented as designed. Independent verification (IV) activities included gamma walkover surveys and soil sample collection/analysis over multiple exposure units (EUs).

King, David A.

2012-08-16T23:59:59.000Z

8

INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION SURVEY REPORT FOR ZONE 1 OF THE EAST TENNESSEE TECHNOLOGY PARK IN OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE DCN 0450-SR-01-0  

SciTech Connect

Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU) conducted in-process inspections and independent verification (IV) surveys in support of DOE’s remedial efforts in Zone 1 of East Tennessee Technology Park (ETTP) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Inspections concluded that the remediation contractor’s soil removal and survey objectives were satisfied and the dynamic verification strategy (DVS) was implemented as designed. Independent verification (IV) activities included gamma walkover surveys and soil sample collection/analysis over multiple exposure units (EUs).

David A. King, CHP

2012-08-16T23:59:59.000Z

9

CONTRACTOR:  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

CONTRACTOR: CONTRACTOR: o// -s- - ' ; &.: 5: "I *. ' .,_ ' This document consists of 13 pages. No. 6 of 11 copies,Series A , CONTRACT NO. AT(30-1)-696 7-m: HORIZONS INCORPORATED Princeton, New Jersey CONTRACT FOR: RESEARCHANDDEVEIWMENT COMMISSION OBLIGATION: * $9140.80 PAYMEXT: To be made by Division of Disbursement, United States Treasury Department, New York, N. Y. (Submit Invoices to: United States Atomic Energy Commission, P.O. Box 30, Ansonia Station, New York 23, New York . ,Ik i-' p.ec / 4 Contract No. AT(30-1)-696 THIS CONTRACT, entered into the 5th day of July, 1949, by and between the UNITED STATES OF AXERICA (hereinafter referred to as the llGovernmentlt), and HORIZONS INCORPORATED (hereinafter referred to as the "Contractortt), a corporation organized and existing under the laws

10

Contractor  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc. Raytheon Engineers & Constructors, Inc. Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation] Reply Comments on U.S. Department of Energy Notice of Inquiry Concerning Preparation of Report to Congress on The Price-Anderson Act 62 Fed.Reg. 68272 (December 31, 1997) February 13, 1998 2 3 I. Introduction The ad hoc Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group (the Group) is submitting the reply comments herein in response to various comments submitted to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or the Department) on its Federal Register "Notice of Inquiry concerning preparation of report to Congress on the Price-Anderson Act" (Notice) of December 31, 1997. 62 Fed.Reg. 68272. Such Notice indicated additional comments could be filed to reply to original comments concerning the continuation or

11

Contractor  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Nuclear Nuclear Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc. Raytheon Engineers & Constructors, Inc. Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation] Response to U.S. Department of Energy Notice of Inquiry Concerning Preparation of Report to Congress on The Price-Anderson Act 62 Fed.Reg. 68272 (December 31, 1997) January 30, 1998 2 1 62 Fed.Reg. 68272. 2 DOE, The Price-Anderson Act - Report to Congress as Required by Section 170p of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as Amended, at 3-4 (Aug. 1, 1983) [hereinafter cited as 1983 DOE Report]. 3 I. Introduction The ad hoc Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group is submitting the comments and recommendations herein in response to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or the Department) Federal Register "Notice of Inquiry concerning preparation of report to Congress on the Price-Anderson Act"

12

A tutorial on text-independent speaker verification  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper presents an overview of a state-of-the-art text-independent speaker verification system. First, an introduction proposes a modular scheme of the training and test phases of a speaker verification system. Then, the most commonly speech parameterization ... Keywords: Gaussian mixture modeling, cepstral analysis, speaker verification, text-independent

Frédéric Bimbot; Jean-François Bonastre; Corinne Fredouille; Guillaume Gravier; Ivan Magrin-Chagnolleau; Sylvain Meignier; Teva Merlin; Javier Ortega-García; Dijana Petrovska-Delacrétaz; Douglas A. Reynolds

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

13

A Tutorial on Text-Independent Speaker Verification  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This paper presents an overview of a state-of-the-art text-independent speaker verification system. First, an introduction proposes a modular scheme of the training and test phases of a speaker verification system. Then, ...

Bimbot, Frederic

14

DOE-STD-1036-93; Guide to Good Practices for Independent Verification  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6-93 6-93 June 1993 CHANGE NOTICE NO. 1 December 1998 DOE STANDARD GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. Change Notice No. 1 DOE-STD-1036-93 December 1998 Guide to Good Practices for Independent Verification Page / Section Change p. 11 / Section 4.1.2

15

Independent verification of plutonium decontamination on Johnston Atoll (1992--1996)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Field Command, Defense Special Weapons Agency (FCDSWA) (formerly FCDNA) contracted Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Environmental Technology Section (ETS) to conduct an independent verification (IV) of the Johnston Atoll (JA) Plutonium Decontamination Project by an interagency agreement with the US Department of Energy in 1992. The main island is contaminated with the transuranic elements plutonium and americium, and soil decontamination activities have been ongoing since 1984. FCDSWA has selected a remedy that employs a system of sorting contaminated particles from the coral/soil matrix, allowing uncontaminated soil to be reused. The objective of IV is to evaluate the effectiveness of remedial action. The IV contractor`s task is to determine whether the remedial action contractor has effectively reduced contamination to levels within established criteria and whether the supporting documentation describing the remedial action is adequate. ORNL conducted four interrelated tasks from 1992 through 1996 to accomplish the IV mission. This document is a compilation and summary of those activities, in addition to a comprehensive review of the history of the project.

Wilson-Nichols, M.J.; Wilson, J.E.; McDowell-Boyer, L.M.; Davidson, J.R.; Egidi, P.V.; Coleman, R.L.

1998-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

16

Independent Verification Survey Report for the Long Island Solar Farm, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

5119-SR-01-0 INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION SURVEY REPORT FOR THE LONG ISLAND SOLAR FARM, BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY

E.M. Harpenau

2010-11-15T23:59:59.000Z

17

INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION REVIEW AND SURVEY of the Argonne National Laboratory Building 301 Footprint  

SciTech Connect

INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION REVIEW AND SURVEY of the Argonne National Laboratory Building 301 Footprint, Argonne Illinois 5061-SR-01-0

E.N. Bailey

2010-05-26T23:59:59.000Z

18

Integrated Safety Management System Phase 1 and 2 Verification for the Environmental Restoration Contractor Volumes 1 and 2  

SciTech Connect

DOE Policy 450.4 mandates that safety be integrated into all aspects of the management and operations of its facilities. The goal of an institutionalized Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) is to have a single integrated system that includes Environment, Safety, and Health requirements in the work planning and execution processes to ensure the protection of the worker, public, environment, and the federal property over the life cycle of the Environmental Restoration (ER) Project. The purpose of this Environmental Restoration Contractor (ERC) ISMS Phase MI Verification was to determine whether ISMS programs and processes were institutionalized within the ER Project, whether these programs and processes were implemented, and whether the system had promoted the development of a safety conscious work culture.

CARTER, R.P.

2000-04-04T23:59:59.000Z

19

FINAL REPORT –INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION SURVEY SUMMARY AND RESULTS FOR THE ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY BUILDING 330 PROJECT FOOTPRINT, ARGONNE, ILLINOIS  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

ORISE conducted onsite verification activities of the Building 330 project footprint during the period of June 6 through June 7, 2011. The verification activities included technical reviews of project documents, visual inspections, radiation surface scans, and sampling and analysis. The draft verification report was issued in July 2011 with findings and recommendations. The contractor performed additional evaluations and remediation.

ERIKA N. BAILEY

2012-02-29T23:59:59.000Z

20

INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION SURVEY REPORT OPERABLE UNIT-1 LANDFILL TRENCHES, MIAMISBURG CLOSURE PROJECT  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION SURVEY REPORT FOR THE OPERABLE UNIT-1 LANDFILL TRENCHES, MIAMISBURG CLOSURE PROJECT, MIAMISBURG, OHIO DCN: 0468-SR-03-0

W.C. Adams

2010-07-21T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent verification contractor" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

REVISED INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION SURVEY OF A AND B RADIOACTIVE WASTE TRANSFER LINES TRENCH BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY  

SciTech Connect

REVISED INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION SURVEY OF THE A AND B RADIOACTIVE WASTE TRANSFER LINES TRENCH, BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY 5062-SR-01-1

P.C. Weaver

2010-02-10T23:59:59.000Z

22

INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION SURVEY REPORT FOR THE OPERABLE UNIT-1 LANDFILL TRENCHES, MIAMISBURG CLOSURE PROJECT  

SciTech Connect

INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION SURVEY REPORT FOR THE OPERABLE UNIT-1 LANDFILL TRENCHES, MIAMISBURG CLOSURE PROJECT, MIAMISBURG, OHIO DCN: 0468-SR-02-0

W.C. Adams

2010-05-24T23:59:59.000Z

23

Results of the independent radiological verification survey at 113 Avenue E, Lodi, New Jersey (LJ081V)  

SciTech Connect

Thorium ores were processed by the Maywood Chemical Works until the property was sold to Stepan Chemical Company in 1959. Wastes were stored at what is now called the Maywood Interim Storage Site (MISS), owned by the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE). Because of the migration of residuals off site into the surrounding areas, the Stepan property and several vicinity properties were designated for remedial action under the 1984 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act. The DOE conducted radiological surveys of these sites to evaluate current radiological conditions as part of the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). In 1988, radiological surveys of some private residential properties on Avenue E in Lodi, New Jersey were conducted by members of an ORNL radiological survey team. Results of this survey indicated radiological contamination in excess of the DOE criteria for surface contamination at this vicinity property (113 Avenue E), and it was recommended for remediation. In the fall of 1995, a verification survey of this vicinity property was conducted by ORNL, the independent verification contractor for this effort, in conjunction with decontamination operations conducted under the supervision of Bechtel National Incorporated. The verification survey included complete surface gamma scans of the grounds and the collection of soil samples for radionuclide analysis. This report describes the radiological verification survey of this residential property.

Rodriguez, R.E.; Johnson, C.A.

1996-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

24

Results of the independent radiological verification survey at 108 Avenue E, Lodi, New Jersey (LJ084V)  

SciTech Connect

Thorium ores were processed by the Maywood Chemical Works until the property was sold to Stepan Chemical Company in 1959. Wastes were stored at what is now called the Maywood Interim Storage Site (MISS), owned by the US Department of Energy (DOE). Because of the migration of residuals off site into the surrounding areas, the Stepan property and several vicinity properties were designated for remedial action under the 1984 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act. The DOE conducted radiological surveys of these sites to evaluate current radiological conditions as part of the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). In 1988, radiological surveys of some private residential properties on Avenue E in Lodi, New Jersey were conducted by members of an ORNL radiological survey team. Results of this survey indicated radiological contamination in excess of the DOE criteria for surface contamination at this vicinity property (108 Avenue E), and it was recommended for remediation. In the fall of 1995, a verification survey of this vicinity property was conducted by ORNL, the independent verification contractor for this effort, in conjunction with decontamination operations conducted under the supervision of Bechtel National Incorporated. The verification survey included complete surface gamma scans of the grounds and the collection of soil samples for radionuclide analysis. This report describes the radiological verification survey of this residential property.

Rodriguez, R.E.; Johnson, C.A.

1996-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

25

Independent Verification Final Summary Report for the David Witherspoon, Inc. 1630 Site Knoxville, Tennessee  

SciTech Connect

The primary objective of the independent verification was to determine if BJC performed the appropriate actions to meet the specified “hot spot” cleanup criteria of 500 picocuries per gram (pCi/g) uranium-238 (U-238) in surface soil. Specific tasks performed by the independent verification team (IVT) to satisfy this objective included: 1) performing radiological walkover surveys, and 2) collecting soil samples for independent analyses. The independent verification (IV) efforts were designed to evaluate radioactive contaminants (specifically U-238) in the exposed surfaces below one foot of the original site grade, given that the top one foot layer of soil on the site was removed in its entirety.

P.C. Weaver

2009-04-29T23:59:59.000Z

26

Results of the independent radiological verification survey at 112 Avenue E, Lodi, New Jersey (LJ082V)  

SciTech Connect

Thorium ores were processed by the Maywood Chemical Works until the property was sold to Stepan Chemical Company in 1959. Wastes were stored at what is now called the Maywood Interim Storage Site (MISS), owned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Because of the migration of residuals off site into the surrounding areas, the Stepan property and several vicinity properties were designated for remedial action under the 1984 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act. The DOE conducted radiological surveys of these sites to evaluate current radiological conditions as part of the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). In 1988, radiological surveys of some private residential properties on Avenue E in Lodi, New Jersey were conducted by members of an ORNL radiological survey team. Results of this survey indicated radiological contamination in excess of the DOE criteria for surface contamination at this vicinity property (112 Avenue E), and it was recommended for remediation. In the fall of 1995, a verification survey of this vicinity property was conducted by ORNL, the independent verification contractor for this effort, in conjunction with decontamination operations conducted under the supervision of Bechtel National Incorporated. The verification survey included complete surface gamma scans of the grounds and the collection of soil samples for radionuclide analysis. This report describes the radiological verification survey of this residential property. Based on the remedial action and verification survey data reported in this document, all radiological measurements fall below the limits prescribed by DOE radiological guidelines established for this site, and the property at 112 Avenue E, Lodi, New Jersey successfully meets the DOE radiological guidelines for unrestricted use.

Rodriguez, R.E.; Johnson, C.A.

1996-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

27

Clock independent timing verification of level-sensitive latches  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper presents a method to automatically handle level-sensitive latches in timing analysis/verification. Timing specifications, including delays and timing constraints, are automatically generated for the cells in the design. The generated timing ...

Robert Tjärnström

1991-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

28

Independent Verification Survey Report for the Operable Unit-1 Miamisburg Closure Project, Miamisburg, OH  

SciTech Connect

The objectives of the independent verification survey were to confirm that remedial actions have been effective in meeting established release criteria and that documentation accurately and adequately describes the current radiological and chemical conditions of the MCP site.

Weaver, P.

2008-03-17T23:59:59.000Z

29

INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF THE BUILDING 3550 SLAB AT OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) has completed the independent verification survey of the Building 3550 Slab. The results of this effort are provided. The objective of this verification survey is to provide independent review and field assessment of remediation actions conducted by Safety and Ecology Corporation (SEC) to document that the final radiological condition of the slab meets the release guidelines. Verification survey activities on the Building 3550 Slab that included scans, measurements, and the collection of smears. Scans for alpha, alpha plus beta, and gamma activity identified several areas that were investigated.

Weaver, Phyllis C.

2012-05-08T23:59:59.000Z

30

INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION SURVEY SUMMARY AND RESULTS FOR SUB-SLAB SOILS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FORMER BUILDING K-33, OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

At DOE’s request, ORAU conducted confirmatory surveys of the K-33 sub-slab soil during the period of August 2011 through May 2012. The survey activities included visual inspections and measurement and sampling activities. LSRS was forthcoming with information relating to surface scan results. Scans performed by the contractor were of adequate coverage and overall data appear to represent actual site conditions. However, the LSRS technicians failed to identify several areas of elevated direct gamma radiation. Most of the samples taken by ORAU at locations of elevated instrument response were above the remediation concentration for one or more radionuclides of concern (ROC). The contractor was, however, quick to perform additional remediation of areas identified to have contamination above the guidelines. Further investigation by ORAU was not requested once additional remediation was completed. It is presumed the remediation contractor’s future PCCR will present detailed and conclusive evidence that K-33 sub-slab soils either comply or do not comply with record of decision (ROD) criteria. However, ORAU concludes, based on both independent verification (IV) data and data provided by LSRS, that the remediation contractor followed appropriate and applicable procedures and that the associated data adequately represent site conditions.

NICK A. ALTIC

2012-09-20T23:59:59.000Z

31

Results of the independent radiological verification survey at the former Chapman Valve Manufacturing Company, Indian Orchard, Massachusetts (CIO001V)  

SciTech Connect

The Chapman Valve Manufacturing Company in Indian Orchard, Massachusetts was one of many companies performing work during the 1940s associated with the development of nuclear energy for defense-related projects for the Manhattan Engineer District (MED) and the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC). In 1991, a radiological survey was conducted at the site. The survey report indicated {sup 238}U contamination in excess of the DOE criteria for surface contamination, and some {sup 235}U residues in the west end of the building. Decontamination of the facility to supplemental guidelines, derived by a hazard assessment based on appropriate scenarios for this building, was conducted by subcontractor personnel in 1995 under the direction of Bechtel National Incorporated (BNI), the project management contractor for FUSRAP. The independent radiological verification survey detailed in this report was performed in July and August 1995 under the FUSRAP program by members of ORNL at the request of DOE. The radiological verification survey of the west end of the building included gamma, alpha, and beta-gamma scans for fixed contamination, smear sampling for transferable contamination, and radionuclide analysis of soil samples taken from outside the building and from excavations in the concrete floor inside the building.

Rodriguez, R.E.; Johnson, C.A.

1997-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

32

INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION SURVEY OF THE HIGH FLUX BEAM REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING PROJECT OUTSIDE AREAS BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY UPTON, NEW YORK  

SciTech Connect

5098-SR-03-0 FINAL REPORT- INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION SURVEY OF THE HIGH FLUX BEAM REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING PROJECT OUTSIDE AREAS, BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY

P.C. Weaver

2010-12-15T23:59:59.000Z

33

LETTER REPORT INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF THE HIGH FLUX BEAM REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING PROJECT FAN HOUSE, BUILDING 704 BNL  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

5098-LR-01-0 -LETTER REPORT INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF THE HIGH FLUX BEAM REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING PROJECT FAN HOUSE, BUILDING 704 BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY

P.C. Weaver

2010-10-22T23:59:59.000Z

34

Results of the independent verification survey at the Old Betatron Building, Granite City, Illinois  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A team from the Measurement Applications and Development Group, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), conducted an independent verification of the radiological condition of the Old Betatron Building, Granite City, Illinois, at the request of the Department of Energy in June of 1993. The building is owned by the National Steel Corporation. The contamination present resulted from the handling of uranium slabs of metal during the time the betatron facility was used to x-ray the slabs for metallurgical defects. The designation survey did not characterize the entire floor space because of obstructing equipment and debris. Therefore, prior to remediation by Bechtel National, Incorporated (BNI), a thorough characterization of the floor was conducted, and the results were immediately conveyed to on-site staff of BNI. An independent verification assessment was also performed after the cleanup activities were performed under the direction of BNI. The process of characterization, remediation, and verification was accomplished within a five-day period. Based on results of the independent verification assessment, the Old Betatron Building was determined to meet the DOE radiological guidelines for unrestricted use.

Murray, M.E.; Brown, K.S.

1994-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

35

INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF THE CENTRAL CAMPUS AND SOUTHEAST LABORATORY COMPLEX BUILDING SLABS AT OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY, OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE  

SciTech Connect

Oak Ridge Associated Universities/Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORAU/ORISE) has completed the independent verification survey of the Central Campus and Southeast Lab Complex Building Slabs. The results of this effort are provided. The objective of this verification survey was to provide independent review and field assessment of remediation actions conducted by SEC, and to independently assess whether the final radiological condition of the slabs met the release guidelines.

Weaver, Phyllis C.

2012-07-24T23:59:59.000Z

36

Contractor Information  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Vienna U.S. Vienna Vienna, Austria Other Information U.S. Dept. of State U.S. Dept. of Energy IAEA NRC CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Contractor Procurement Template SSTS Process...

37

An independent verification and validation of the Future Theater Level Model conceptual model  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report describes the methodology and results of independent verification and validation performed on a combat model in its design stage. The combat model is the Future Theater Level Model (FTLM), under development by The Joint Staff/J-8. J-8 has undertaken its development to provide an analysis tool that addresses the uncertainties of combat more directly than previous models and yields more rapid study results. The methodology adopted for this verification and validation consisted of document analyses. Included were detailed examination of the FTLM design documents (at all stages of development), the FTLM Mission Needs Statement, and selected documentation for other theater level combat models. These documents were compared to assess the FTLM as to its design stage, its purpose as an analytical combat model, and its capabilities as specified in the Mission Needs Statement. The conceptual design passed those tests. The recommendations included specific modifications as well as a recommendation for continued development. The methodology is significant because independent verification and validation have not been previously reported as being performed on a combat model in its design stage. The results are significant because The Joint Staff/J-8 will be using the recommendations from this study in determining whether to proceed with develop of the model.

Hartley, D.S. III; Kruse, K.L.; Martellaro, A.J.; Packard, S.L.; Thomas, B. Jr.; Turley, V.K.

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

38

Independent Oversight Review of Department of Energy Contractor Occupational Medicine Programs from June 1998 to December 1999  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Executive Summary Executive Summary The Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Oversight performed a two-phased review of eight Departmental contractor occupational medicine programs. The first phase of the review was completed in September 1998 and the second phase in December 1999. To conduct the review, Oversight teamed with the Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC), a non-profit accreditation organization for health-care facilities. The Office of Oversight's interim report on the three sites covered in the initial phase revealed that some contractor occupational medicine programs were not implementing several important DOE policies and requirements. The most significant issue concerned the comprehensiveness of medical surveillance programs. Other issues included poorly defined and marginally implemented quality management and

39

Independent Oversight Review of Department of Energy Contractor Occupational Medicine Programs from June 1998 to December 1999  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Summary Summary The Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Oversight performed a two-phased review of eight Departmental contractor occupational medicine programs. The first phase of the review was completed in September 1998 and the second phase in December 1999. To conduct the review, Oversight teamed with the Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC), a non-profit accreditation organization for health-care facilities. The Office of Oversight's interim report on the three sites covered in the initial phase revealed that some contractor occupational medicine programs were not implementing several important DOE policies and requirements. The most significant issue concerned the comprehensiveness of medical surveillance programs. Other issues included poorly defined and marginally implemented quality management and

40

Solar Contractor Licensing | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor Licensing Contractor Licensing Solar Contractor Licensing < Back Eligibility Installer/Contractor Savings Category Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Solar Heating Buying & Making Electricity Swimming Pool Heaters Water Heating Program Info State California Program Type Solar/Wind Contractor Licensing Provider California Contractors State License Board The California Contractors State License Board administers contractor licenses. The C-46 Solar Contractor license covers active solar water and space heating systems, solar pool heating systems, and photovoltaic systems. C-46 requirements include four years of experience and passing the business and law exam and the trade exam. Independent license schools offer courses to prepare for license exams.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent verification contractor" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Independent verification and benchmark testing of the UNSAT-H computer code, Version 2. 0  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Independent testing of the UNSAT-H computer code, Version 2.0, was conducted to establish confidence that the code is ready for general use in performance assessment applications. Verification and benchmark test problems were used to check the correctness of the FORTRAN coding, computational efficiency and accuracy of the numerical algorithm, and code, capability to simulate diverse hydrologic conditions. This testing was performed using a structured and quantitative evaluation protocol. The protocol consisted of: blind testing, independent applications, maintaining test equivalence and use of graduated test cases. Graphical comparisons and calculation of the relative root mean square (RRMS) values were used as indicators of accuracy and consistency levels. Four specific ranges of RRMS values were chosen for in judging the quality of the comparison. Four verification test problems were used to check the computational accuracy of UNSAT-H in solving the uncoupled fluid flow and heat transport equations. Five benchmark test problems, ranging in complexity, were used to check the code's simulation capability. Some of the benchmark test cases include comparisons with laboratory and field data. The primary findings of this independent testing is that the UNSAT-H is fully operationaL In general, the test results showed that computer code produced unsaturated flow simulations with excellent stability, reasonable accuracy, and acceptable speed. This report describes the technical basis, approach, and results of the independent testing. A number of future refinements to the UNSAT-H code are recommended that would improve: computational speed and accuracy, code usability and code portability. Aspects of the code that warrant further testing are outlined.

Baca, R.G.; Magnuson, S.O.

1990-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

42

Independent verification and benchmark testing of the UNSAT-H computer code, Version 2.0  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Independent testing of the UNSAT-H computer code, Version 2.0, was conducted to establish confidence that the code is ready for general use in performance assessment applications. Verification and benchmark test problems were used to check the correctness of the FORTRAN coding, computational efficiency and accuracy of the numerical algorithm, and code, capability to simulate diverse hydrologic conditions. This testing was performed using a structured and quantitative evaluation protocol. The protocol consisted of: blind testing, independent applications, maintaining test equivalence and use of graduated test cases. Graphical comparisons and calculation of the relative root mean square (RRMS) values were used as indicators of accuracy and consistency levels. Four specific ranges of RRMS values were chosen for in judging the quality of the comparison. Four verification test problems were used to check the computational accuracy of UNSAT-H in solving the uncoupled fluid flow and heat transport equations. Five benchmark test problems, ranging in complexity, were used to check the code`s simulation capability. Some of the benchmark test cases include comparisons with laboratory and field data. The primary findings of this independent testing is that the UNSAT-H is fully operationaL In general, the test results showed that computer code produced unsaturated flow simulations with excellent stability, reasonable accuracy, and acceptable speed. This report describes the technical basis, approach, and results of the independent testing. A number of future refinements to the UNSAT-H code are recommended that would improve: computational speed and accuracy, code usability and code portability. Aspects of the code that warrant further testing are outlined.

Baca, R.G.; Magnuson, S.O.

1990-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

43

An algorithm for independent verification of Gamma Knife{sup TM} treatment plans  

SciTech Connect

A formalism for independent treatment verification has been developed for Gamma Knife{sup TM} radiosurgery in analogy to the second checks being performed routinely in the field of external beam radiotherapy. A verification algorithm is presented, and evaluated based on its agreement with treatment planning calculations for the first 40 Canadian Gamma Knife{sup TM} patients. The algorithm is used to calculate the irradiation time for each shot, and the value of the dose at the maximum dose point in each calculation matrix. Data entry consists of information included on the plan printout, and can be streamlined by using an optional plan import feature. Calculated shot times differed from those generated by the treatment planning software by an average of 0.3%, with a standard deviation of 1.4%. The agreement of dose maxima was comparable with an average of -0.2% and a standard deviation of 1.3%. Consistently accurate comparisons were observed for centrally located lesions treated with a small number of shots. Large discrepancies were almost all associated with dose plans utilizing a large number of collimator plugs, for which the simplifying approximations used by the program are known to break down.

Beck, James; Berndt, Anita [Division of Medical Physics, CancerCare Manitoba, 675 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 0V9 (Canada); Winnipeg Centre for Gamma Knife Surgery, Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg Regional Health Authority, Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba (Canada); Division of Medical Physics, CancerCare Manitoba, 675 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 0V9 (Canada); Winnipeg Centre for Gamma Knife Surgery, Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg Regional Health Authority, Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba (Canada); Department of Radiology, University of Manitoba (Canada); Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manitoba (Canada)

2004-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

44

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 System Test Plan Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of the Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) role in the evaluation of the SAPHIRE System Test Plan is to assess the approach to be taken for intended testing activities associated with the SAPHIRE software product. The IV&V team began this endeavor after the software engineering and software development of SAPHIRE had already been in production.

Kent Norris

2010-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

45

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Software Requirements Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of the Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) role in the evaluation of the SAPHIRE requirements definition is to assess the activities that results in the specification, documentation, and review of the requirements that the software product must satisfy, including functionality, performance, design constraints, attributes and external interfaces. The IV&V team began this endeavor after the software engineering and software development of SAPHIRE had already been in production. IV&V reviewed the requirements specified in the NRC Form 189s to verify these requirements were included in SAPHIRE’s Software Verification and Validation Plan (SVVP).

Kent Norris

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

46

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Software Requirements Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of the Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) role in the evaluation of the SAPHIRE requirements definition is to assess the activities that results in the specification, documentation, and review of the requirements that the software product must satisfy, including functionality, performance, design constraints, attributes and external interfaces. The IV&V team began this endeavor after the software engineering and software development of SAPHIRE had already been in production. IV&V reviewed the requirements specified in the NRC Form 189s to verify these requirements were included in SAPHIRE’s Software Verification and Validation Plan (SVVP).

Kent Norris

2009-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

47

Writer-independent off-line signature verification using surroundedness feature  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The paper presents a novel set of features based on surroundedness property of a signature (image in binary form) for off-line signature verification. The proposed feature set describes the shape of a signature in terms of spatial distribution of black ... Keywords: Feature selection, Shape, Signature verification, Surroundedness, Texture

Rajesh Kumar; J. D. Sharma; Bhabatosh Chanda

2012-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

48

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - September 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Savannah River Site - September 2011 Savannah River Site - September 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - September 2011 September 2011 Review of the Implementation Verification Review Processes at the Savannah River Site Environmental Management Nuclear Facilities The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the Implementation Verification Review (IVR) Processes at Savannah River Site Environmental Management Nuclear Facilities. The overall objective of the Independent Oversight IVR review process includes verification that contractors and site offices have developed and implemented appropriate methods for performing IVRs (including direction for scheduling and conducting IVR activities) and measurement of the

49

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - September 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - September 2011 September 2011 Review of the Implementation Verification Review Processes at the Savannah River Site Environmental Management Nuclear Facilities The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the Implementation Verification Review (IVR) Processes at Savannah River Site Environmental Management Nuclear Facilities. The overall objective of the Independent Oversight IVR review process includes verification that contractors and site offices have developed and implemented appropriate methods for performing IVRs (including direction for scheduling and conducting IVR activities) and measurement of the

50

EA-507; Environmental Assessment and FONSI For The FAA Explosive Detection System Independent Validation And Verification Program INEL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

07; Environmental Assessment and FONSI For The FAA Explosive 07; Environmental Assessment and FONSI For The FAA Explosive Detection System Independent Validation And Verification Program INEL Table of Contents 1. NEED FOR PROPOSED ACTION 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION 3. ALTERNATIVES TO PROPOSED ACTION 4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF PROPOSED ACTION 5. CONCLUSIONS/SUMMARY 6. LIST OF PREPARERS 7. REFERENCES APPENDIX I Map of WRRTF APPENDIX II Accident Safety Analysis FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION EXPLOSIVE DETECTION SYSTEM - INDEPENDENT VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION PROGRAM LIST OF FIGURES Page XXX WATER REACTOR RESEARCH TEST FACT 1. NEED FOR PROPOSED ACTION The urgent development, fabrication, and operation of advanced explosive detection systems are needed by the Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) to

51

Staff and Contractor Archive  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

staff-contractor-archive 1000 Independence Ave. SW staff-contractor-archive 1000 Independence Ave. SW Washington DC 20585 202-586-5000 en Time to Give: Energy Department Celebrates Kickoff of CFC 2013 http://energy.gov/articles/time-give-energy-department-celebrates-kickoff-cfc-2013 Time to Give: Energy Department Celebrates Kickoff of CFC 2013

52

Verification and Validation of Facilities Procedures Assessment Plan - Developed By NNSA/Nevada Site Office Independent Oversight Division  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Verification and Validation of Facilities Procedures Verification and Validation of Facilities Procedures Assessment Plan NNSA/Nevada Site Office Independent Oversight Division Performance Objective: The purpose of this assessment is verify and validate the process for the development of operations procedures and that procedures are in place which provide direction to personnel to ensure that the facility is operated within its design bases. Criteria: Operations procedures should be written to provide specific direction for operating systems and equipment during normal and postulated abnormal and emergency conditions. (DOE O 5480.19 A) Operations procedures should provide appropriate direction to ensure that the facility is operated within its design bases and should be effectively used to support safe operations of the facility. (DOE O 5480.19 A)

53

Final Report Independent Verification Survey of the High Flux Beam Reactor, Building 802 Fan House Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, New York  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

On May 9, 2011, ORISE conducted verification survey activities including scans, sampling, and the collection of smears of the remaining soils and off-gas pipe associated with the 802 Fan House within the HFBR (High Flux Beam Reactor) Complex at BNL. ORISE is of the opinion, based on independent scan and sample results obtained during verification activities at the HFBR 802 Fan House, that the FSS (final status survey) unit meets the applicable site cleanup objectives established for as left radiological conditions.

Evan Harpeneau

2011-06-24T23:59:59.000Z

54

Contractor Past Performance Information  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 2013) 1 Contractor Performance Information This chapter incorporates the Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) policy that became effective October 1, 2010, Contractor...

55

Independent Oversight Review of Nevada Site Office and National Security Technologies, LLC, Line Oversight and Contractor Assurance Sysetms Self-Assessment, November 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Nevada Site Office and National Security Nevada Site Office and National Security Technologies, LLC, Line Oversight and Contractor Assurance Systems Self-Assessment May 2011 November 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ......................................................................................................................................1 2.0 Background ...............................................................................................................................1 3.0 Scope .........................................................................................................................................2

56

Independent Oversight Review of Nevada Site Office and National Security Technologies, LLC, Line Oversight and Contractor Assurance Sysetms Self-Assessment, November 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Nevada Site Office and National Security Nevada Site Office and National Security Technologies, LLC, Line Oversight and Contractor Assurance Systems Self-Assessment May 2011 November 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ......................................................................................................................................1 2.0 Background ...............................................................................................................................1 3.0 Scope .........................................................................................................................................2

57

Contractor Employee Assistance at DOE Contractor Sites  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Worker Safety and Health Assistance Worker Safety and Health Assistance Home Mission and Functions Voluntary Protection Program Employee Assistance Program for DOE Contractor and Subcontractor Workers Technical Assistance Rulemaking Human Reliability Program Technical Assistance Rulemaking Health and Safety HSS Logo Contractor Employee Assistance at DOE Contractor Sites Employee Assistance Program For DOE Contractor and Subcontractor Workers The DOE Employee Assistance Program (EAP) for DOE contractor and subcontractor workers complements the DOE medical and psychological evaluations and surveillance program. The EAP provides contractor workers who are experiencing personal problems with an opportunity to receive appropriate treatment and support. The goal of the EAP is to provide a conduit through which the individual can resolve personal and workplace problems. The HSS EAP Manager aids the DOE contracting organizations to maintain a healthy and productive workforce.

58

Text-independent speaker verification: state of the art and challenges  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Speech is often the only available modality to recognize the identity of a person (over the telephone, the radio, in the dark,. . . ). Automatic speaker recognition has been studied for several decades. In this chapter the state of the current text-independant ...

Dijana Petrovska-Delacrétaz; Asmaa El Hannani; Gérard Chollet

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

59

Staff and Contractors Blog Archive  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

staff-contractor Office of staff-contractor Office of Economic Impact & Diversity US Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC, 20585 202-586-8383 en 2013 Asian American & Pacific Islander Heritage Month Resources and Theme http://energy.gov/diversity/articles/2013-asian-american-pacific-islander-heritage-month-resources-and-theme 2013 Asian American & Pacific Islander Heritage Month Resources and Theme

60

Solar Heating Contractor Licensing  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Michigan offers a solar heating contractor specialty license to individuals who have at least three years of experience installing solar equipment under the direction of a licensed solar contractor...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent verification contractor" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

DOE Removes Brookhaven Contractor  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Removes DOE Removes Brookhaven Contractor Peña sends a message to DOE facilities nationwide INSIDE 2 Accelerator Rx 4 FermiKids 6 Spring at Fermilab Photos courtesy of Brookhaven National Laboratory by Judy Jackson, Office of Public Affairs Secretary of Energy Federico Peña announced on Thursday, May 1, that the Department of Energy would immediately terminate the current management contract with Associated Universities, Inc. at Brookhaven National Laboratory in Upton, New York. Peña said that he made the decision after receiving the results of a laboratory safety management review conducted by the independent oversight arm of DOE's Office of Environment, Safety and Health. In addition, the Secretary said he found unacceptable "the continued on page 8 Volume 20 Friday, May 16, 1997

62

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Software Design and Interface Design Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of the Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) role in the evaluation of the SAPHIRE software design and interface design is to assess the activities that results in the development, documentation, and review of a software design that meets the requirements defined in the software requirements documentation. The IV&V team began this endeavor after the software engineering and software development of SAPHIRE had already been in production. IV&V reviewed the requirements specified in the NRC Form 189s to verify these requirements were included in SAPHIRE’s Software Verification and Validation Plan (SVVP) design specification.

Kent Norris

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

63

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Software Design and Interface Design Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of the Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) role in the evaluation of the SAPHIRE software design and interface design is to assess the activities that results in the development, documentation, and review of a software design that meets the requirements defined in the software requirements documentation. The IV&V team began this endeavor after the software engineering and software development of SAPHIRE had already been in production. IV&V reviewed the requirements specified in the NRC Form 189s to verify these requirements were included in SAPHIRE’s Software Verification and Validation Plan (SVVP) design specification.

Kent Norris

2009-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

64

Contractor Employee Pension medical benifits | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor Employee Pension medical benifits Contractor Employee Pension medical benifits Contractor Employee Pension medical benifits, FRComment5820071.pdf Contractor Employee...

65

Independent Oversight Review, Argonne National Laboratory - November 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review, Argonne National Laboratory - Review, Argonne National Laboratory - November 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Argonne National Laboratory - November 2011 November 2011 Review of the Argonne National Laboratory Alpha-Gamma Hot Cell Facility Readiness Assessment (Implementation Verification Review Sections) This report documents the review of the Alpha-Gamma Hot Cell Facility (AGHCF) readiness assessment (RA) by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The overall objectives of the IVR assessments include verification that contractors and site offices have procedures and processes for scheduling and conducting IVR activities in place and have developed and implemented appropriate methods for performing implementation

66

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Volume 3 Users' Guide Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of the Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) role in the evaluation of the SAPHIRE 8 Volume 3 Users’ Guide is to assess the user documentation for its completeness, correctness, and consistency with respect to requirements for user interface and for any functionality that can be invoked by the user. The IV&V team began this endeavor after the software engineering and software development of SAPHIRE had already been in production.

Kent Norris

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

67

ORISE: Independent verification  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

to determine the effectiveness of radiological cleanup at decontamination and decommissioning (D&D) projects across the United States. Since 1980, ORISE has performed...

68

SUMMARY AND RESULTS LETTER REPORT – INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF THE HIGH FLUX BEAM REACTOR UNDERGROUND UTILITIES REMOVAL PROJECT, PHASE 3: TRENCHES 2, 3, AND 4 BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY UPTON, NEW YORK  

SciTech Connect

5098-LR-02-0 SUMMARY AND RESULTS LETTER REPORT – INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF THE HIGH FLUX BEAM REACTOR UNDERGROUND UTILITIES REMOVAL PROJECT, PHASE 3 TRENCHES 2, 3, AND 4 BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY

E.M. Harpenau

2010-11-15T23:59:59.000Z

69

Contractor Past Performance Information  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 2009) December 2009) 1 Contractor Performance Information Guiding Principles The primary purpose of past performance evaluations is to ensure that accurate data on contractor performance is current and available for use in source selections. A past performance evaluation report provides a record of a contractor's performance, both positive and negative, on a given contract during a specified period of time. The quality of the narrative component supporting the past performance information evaluation is critical. If the evaluator takes the time to prepare an accurate and complete report, the evaluator helps ensure better quality in the products and services DOE buys now and those DOE plans to buy in the future.

70

Independent Oversight Lessons Learned from Targeted Reviews of Implementation Verification Review Processes at Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities, May 2013  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lessons Learned from Targeted Reviews of Implementation Verification Review Processes at Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities May 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................................ii Executive Summaiy .....................................................................................................................................iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1

71

Independent Oversight Lessons Learned from Targeted Reviews of Implementation Verification Review Processes at Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities, May 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned from Targeted Reviews of Implementation Verification Review Processes at Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities May 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................................ii Executive Summaiy .....................................................................................................................................iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1

72

DOE CONTRACTOR PENSION PLANS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1-13 1-13 For use in M&O and non-M&O cost reimbursement solicitations and contracts where work had been previously performed under a DOE M&O contract and the successor Contractor is (a) required to employ all or part of the former Contractor's workforce and sponsors the employee pension and benefit plans; or (b) retains sponsorship of benefit plans that survive performance of the contract work scope. Contracts in this latter category include, but are not limited to, environmental remediation, infrastructure services and other site-specific project completion contracts. DOE-H-1002 EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION: PAY AND BENEFITS (a) Contractor Employee Compensation Plan The Contractor shall submit, for Contracting Officer approval, by (fill-in

73

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Software Configuration Management Plan Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of the Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) role in the evaluation of the SAPHIRE configuration management is to assess the activities that results in the process of identifying and defining the baselines associated with the SAPHIRE software product; controlling the changes to baselines and release of baselines throughout the life cycle; recording and reporting the status of baselines and the proposed and actual changes to the baselines; and verifying the correctness and completeness of baselines.. The IV&V team began this endeavor after the software engineering and software development of SAPHIRE had already been in production.

Kent Norris

2009-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

74

Transient analysis for the tajoura critical facility with IRT-2M HEU fuel and IRT-4M leu fuel : ANL independent verification results.  

SciTech Connect

Calculations have been performed for postulated transients in the Critical Facility at the Tajoura Nuclear Research Center (TNRC) in Libya. These calculations have been performed at the request of staff of the Renewable Energy and Water Desalinization Research Center (REWDRC) who are performing similar calculations. The transients considered were established during a working meeting between ANL and REWDRC staff on October 1-2, 2005 and subsequent email correspondence. Calculations were performed for the current high-enriched uranium (HEU) core and the proposed low-enriched uranium (LEU) core. These calculations have been performed independently from those being performed by REWDRC and serve as one step in the verification process.

Garner, P. L.; Hanan, N. A.

2005-12-02T23:59:59.000Z

75

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Software Configuration Management Plan Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of the Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) role in the evaluation of the SAPHIRE configuration management is to assess the activities that results in the process of identifying and defining the baselines associated with the SAPHIRE software product; controlling the changes to baselines and release of baselines throughout the life cycle; recording and reporting the status of baselines and the proposed and actual changes to the baselines; and verifying the correctness and completeness of baselines.. The IV&V team began this endeavor after the software engineering and software development of SAPHIRE had already been in production.

Kent Norris

2010-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

76

Independent Verification Survey of the Clean Coral Storage Pile at the Johnston Atoll Plutonium-Contaminated Soil Remediation Project  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Environmental Technology Section conducted an independent verification (IV) survey of the clean storage pile at the Johnston Atoll Plutonium Contaminated Soil Remediation Project (JAPCSRP) from January 18-25, 1999. The goal of the JAPCSRP is to restore a 24-acre area that was contaminated with plutonium oxide particles during nuclear testing in the 1960s. The selected remedy was a soil sorting operation that combined radiological measurements and mining processes to identify and sequester plutonium-contaminated soil. The soil sorter operated from about 1990 to 1998. The remaining clean soil is stored on-site for planned beneficial use on Johnston Island. The clean storage pile currently consists of approximately 120,000 m{sup 3} of coral. ORNL conducted the survey according to a Sampling and Analysis Plan, which proposed to provide an IV of the clean pile by collecting a minimum number (99) of samples. The goal was to ascertain with 95% confidence whether 97% of the processed soil is less than or equal to the accepted guideline (500-Bq/kg or 13.5-pCi/g) total transuranic (TRU) activity. In previous IV tasks, ORNL has (1) evaluated and tested the soil sorter system software and hardware and (2) evaluated the quality control (QC) program used at the soil sorter plant. The IV has found that the soil sorter decontamination was effective and significantly reduced plutonium contamination in the soil processed at the JA site. The Field Command Defense Threat Reduction Agency currently plans to re-use soil from the clean pile as a cover to remaining contamination in portions of the radiological control area. Therefore, ORNL was requested to provide an IV. The survey team collected samples from 103 random locations within the top 4 ft of the clean storage pile. The samples were analyzed in the on-site radioanalytical counting laboratory with an American Nuclear Systems (ANS) field instrument used for the detection of low-energy radiation. Nine results exceeded the JA soil screening guideline for distributed contamination of 13.5 pCi/g for total TRUs, ranging from 13.7 to 125.9 pCi/g. Because of these results, the goal of showing with 95% confidence that 97% of the processed soil is less than or equal to 13.5 pCi/g-TRU activity cannot be met. The value of 13.5 pCi/g represents the 88th percentile rather than the 95th percentile in a nonparametric one-sided upper 90% confidence limit. Therefore, at the 95% confidence level, 88% of the clean pile is projected to be below the 13.5-pCi/g goal. The Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual recommends use of a nonparametric statistical ''Sign Test'' to demonstrate compliance with release criteria for TRU. Although this survey was not designed to use the sign test, the data herein would demonstrate that the median (50%) of the clean storage pile is below the l3.5-pCi/g derived concentration guideline level. In other words, with the caveat that additional investigation of elevated concentrations was not performed, the data pass the sign test at the 13.5-pCi/g level. Additionally, the lateral extent of the pile was gridded, and 10% of the grid blocks was scanned with field instruments for the detection of low-energy radiation coupled to ratemeter/scalers to screen for the presence of hot particles. No hot particles were detected in the top 1 cm of the grid blocks surveyed.

Wilson-Nichols, M.J.

2000-12-07T23:59:59.000Z

77

Contractor Past Performance Information  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 2010) May 2010) 1 Reporting Other Contractor Information into Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System References Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subparts 8.4 Federal Supply Schedules - 8.406 Ordering activity responsibilities 9.1 Responsible Prospective Contractors - 9.105 Procedures 9.4 Debarment, Suspension and Ineligibility - 9.406 Debarment and 9.407 Suspension 12.4 Unique Requirements Regarding Terms and Conditions for Commercial Items - 12.403 Termination 15.4 Contract Pricing - 15.407 Special cost or pricing areas 42.15 Contractor Performance Information - 42.1503 Procedures 49.4 Termination for Default - 49.402 Termination of fixed-price contracts for default DEAR and Acquisition Guide

78

Contractor Past Performance Information  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 2013) August 2013) 1 Reporting Other Contractor Information into Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) References Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subparts 8.4 Federal Supply Schedules - 8.406 Ordering activity responsibilities 9.1 Responsible Prospective Contractors - 9.104 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses and 9.105 Procedures 9.4 Debarment, Suspension and Ineligibility - 9.406 Debarment and 9.407 Suspension 12.4 Unique Requirements Regarding Terms and Conditions for Commercial Items - 12.403 Termination 15.4 Contract Pricing - 15.407 Special cost or pricing areas 42.15 Contractor Performance Information - 42.1503 Procedures 49.4 Termination for Default - 49.402 Termination of fixed-price contracts for default

79

Contractor Past Performance Information  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 2010) December 2010) 1 Contractor Performance Information References Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subparts 8.4 Federal Supply Schedules - 8.406-7 Contractor performance evaluation and 8.406-8 Reporting 9.1 Responsible Prospective Contractors - 9.104 Standards and 9.105 Procedures 9.4 Debarment, Suspension and Ineligibility - 9.406 Debarment and 9.407 Suspension 12.2 Special Requirements for the Acquisition of Commercial Items - 12.206 Use of past performance 12.4 Unique Requirements Regarding Terms and Conditions for Commercial Items - 12.403 Termination 13.1 Procedures - 13.106-2 Evaluation of quotations or offers 15.3 Source Selection - 15.305 Proposal evaluation 15.4 Contract Pricing - 15.407-1 Defective cost or pricing data

80

Contractor Past Performance Information  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 2013) March 2013) 1 Contractor Performance Information This updated chapter incorporates the Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) policy that effective October 1, 2010, Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) is the single government-wide feeder system for past performance information reporting. This chapter supplements the CPARS Guide and related user manuals for all modules available at the CPARS website. The CPARS Guide includes consistent processes and procedures for agencies to use when reporting on past performance information and should be read in conjunction with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 42.15 and other FAR Parts related to past performance information. When needed, this Acquisition Guide Chapter provides

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent verification contractor" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Contractor Employee Assistance at DOE Contractor Sites | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor Employee Assistance at DOE Contractor Sites Contractor Employee Assistance at DOE Contractor Sites Contractor Employee Assistance at DOE Contractor Sites Employee Assistance Program For DOE Contractor and Subcontractor Workers The DOE Employee Assistance Program (EAP) for DOE contractor and subcontractor workers complements the DOE medical and psychological evaluations and surveillance program. The EAP provides contractor workers who are experiencing personal problems with an opportunity to receive appropriate treatment and support. The goal of the EAP is to provide a conduit through which the individual can resolve personal and workplace problems. The HSS EAP Manager aids the DOE contracting organizations to maintain a healthy and productive workforce. The Office of Worker Safety and Health Assistance (HS-12) provides

82

INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION SURVEY OF THE SPRU LOWER LEVEL HILLSIDE AREA AT THE KNOLLS ATOMIC POWER LABORATORY NISKAYUNA, NEW YORK  

SciTech Connect

During August 10, 2011 through August 19, 2011, and October 23, 2011 through November 4, 2011, ORAU/ORISE conducted verification survey activities at the Separations Process Research Unit (SPRU) site that included in-process inspections, surface scans, and soil sampling of the Lower Level Hillside Area. According to the Type-B Investigation Report, Sr-90 was the primary contributor to the majority of the activity (60 times greater than the Cs-137 activity). The evaluation of the scan data and sample results obtained during verification activities determined that the primary radionuclide of concern, Sr-90, was well below the agreed upon soil cleanup objective (SCO) of 30 pCi/g for the site. However, the concentration of Cs-137 in the four judgmental samples collected in final status survey (FSS) Units A and B was greater than the SCO. Both ORAU and aRc surveys identified higher Cs-137 concentrations in FSS Units A and B; the greatest concentrations were indentified in FSS Unit A.

Harpenau, Evan M.; Weaver, Phyllis C.

2012-06-06T23:59:59.000Z

83

Independent Oversight Review, Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant - April  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April 2013 April 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant - April 2013 April 2013 Review of the Integrated Safety Management System Phase I Verification Review at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office (PPPO). The objective of the Independent Oversight review was to evaluate PPPO's conduct of the Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) Phase I verification review at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PORTS). The contractor at PORTS is Fluor-Babcock & Wilcox Portsmouth (FBP). The HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations

84

Transient analyses for the Uzbekistan VVR-SM reactor with IRT-3M HEU fuel and IRT-4M LEU fuel : ANL independent verification results.  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Calculations have been performed for postulated transients in the VVR-SM Reactor at the Institute of Nuclear Physics (INP) of the Academy of Sciences in the Republic of Uzbekistan. (The reactor designation in Cyrillic is BBP-CM; transliterating characters to English gives VVRSM but translating words gives WWR-SM.) These calculations have been performed at the request of staff of the INP who are performing similar calculations. The transients considered were established during working meetings between Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) and INP staff during summer 2006 [Ref. 1], subsequent email correspondence, and subsequent staff visits. Calculations were performed for the current high-enriched uranium (HEU) core, the proposed low-enriched uranium (LEU) core, and one mixed HEU-LEU core during the transition. These calculations have been performed independently from those being performed by INP and serve as one step in the verification process.

Garner, P. L.; Hanan, N. A.; Nuclear Engineering Division

2007-09-24T23:59:59.000Z

85

Results of the independent radiological verification survey at the former Associate Aircraft Tool and Manufacturing Company site, Fairfield, Ohio (FOH001)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The former Associate Aircraft Tool and Manufacturing Company site is located at 3550 Dixie Highway, Fairfield, Ohio. Associate Aircraft Tool and Manufacturing Company produced hollow uranium slugs in a machine shop at the site in 1956. The work was performed for National Lead of Ohio in a contract with the Atomic Energy Commission to augment the capacity of the Feed Materials Production Center at Fernald in the development of nuclear energy for defense-related projects. The current occupant of the building, Force Control, operates a multipurpose machine shop. At the request of the US Department of Energy (DOE), a team from Oak Ridge National Laboratory conducted an independent radiological verification survey at the former Associate Aircraft Tool and Manufacturing Company Site, Fairfield, Ohio. The survey was performed from February to May of 1995. The purpose of the survey was to verify that radioactivity from residues of {sup 238}U was remediated to a level below acceptable DOE guidelines levels.

Rice, D.E.; Murray, M.E.; Brown, K.S.

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

86

102nd Official Services Contractor  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Official Service Contractor & Freight Forwarder Freeman is the appointed Official Service Contractor and Freight Forwarder for the 102nd AOCS Annual Meeting & Expo. Freeman is the official provider of furnishings, carpet, signs and graphi

87

Contractor Fee Payments - Richland Operations Office | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

More Documents & Publications Contractor Fee Payments - Office of River Protection Contractor Fee Payments - Savannah River Site Office Contractor Fee Payments - Carlsbad Field...

88

Contractor SOW Template - ICR | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- ICR.pdf More Documents & Publications Statement of Work (SOW) Template (Combined EIRICE Support Contractor) Contractor Statement of Work (SOW) Template (for EIR) Contractor...

89

Contractor SOW Template - ICE | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SOW Template - ICE Contractor SOW Template - ICE Contractor SOW Template - ICE.pdf More Documents & Publications Contractor SOW Template - ICR Statement of Work (SOW) Template...

90

Solar Contractor Licensing | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Solar Contractor Licensing Solar Contractor Licensing Eligibility InstallerContractor Savings For Solar Buying & Making Electricity Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling...

91

Independent Oversight Review, Y-12 National Security Complex - June 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Y-12 National Security Complex - June Y-12 National Security Complex - June 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Y-12 National Security Complex - June 2012 June 2012 Review of the Y-12 Implementation Verification Review Processes This report documents the independent review of implementation verification review (IVR) processes at the Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12) conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight, Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review was performed from March 12 - 30, 2012. The objective of this review was to evaluate the extent to which the site management and operating contractor, B&W Y-12, a partnership of Babcock & Wilcox and Bechtel Corporation, and the Y-12 Site

92

Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office - November 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- November - November 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office - November 2012 November 2012 Review of the Richland Operations Office Oversight of Implementation Verification Review Processes This report documents the independent review of implementation verification review (IVR) processes at the Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), which is within the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The onsite review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations from August 13 to 17, 2012. The objective of this assessment was to evaluate the extent to which the DOE-RL has developed and employed appropriate methods for oversight of contractor

93

Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office - November 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Richland Operations Office - November Richland Operations Office - November 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office - November 2012 November 2012 Review of the Richland Operations Office Oversight of Implementation Verification Review Processes This report documents the independent review of implementation verification review (IVR) processes at the Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), which is within the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The onsite review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations from August 13 to 17, 2012. The objective of this assessment was to evaluate the extent to which the DOE-RL has developed and employed appropriate methods for oversight of contractor

94

EM Contractors for Capital Asset Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Read the EM Contractors for Capital Asset Projects list, which includes the project name, number, site, and contractor.

95

Independent Verification of Research Reactor Operation (Analysis of the Georgian IRT-M Reactor by the Isotope Ratio Method)  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Nonproliferation and International Security (NA-24) develops technologies to aid in implementing international nuclear safeguards. The Isotope Ratio Method (IRM) was successfully developed in 2005 – 2007 by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) and the Republic of Georgia’s Andronikashvili Institute of Physics as a generic technology to verify the declared operation of water-moderated research reactors, independent of spent fuel inventory. IRM estimates the energy produced over the operating lifetime of a fission reactor by measuring the ratios of the isotopes of trace impurity elements in non-fuel reactor components.The Isotope Ratio Method is a technique for estimating the energy produced over the operating lifetime of a fission reactor by measuring the ratios of the isotopes of impurity elements in non-fuel reactor components.

Cliff, John B.; Frank, Douglas P.; Gerlach, David C.; Gesh, Christopher J.; Little, Winston W.; Reid, Bruce D.; Tsiklauri, Georgi V.; Abramidze, Sh; Rostomashvili, Z.; Kiknadze, G.; Dzhavakhishvily, O.; Nabakhtiani, G.

2010-08-11T23:59:59.000Z

96

Contractor Past Performance Information  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 CPAR Quality Checklist (DOE version December 2009) updated December 2010 This checklist will guide you in creating a quality CPAR which allows a reader, with no personal knowledge of your program/effort, to gain a complete understanding of the Contractor's performance. Taking the time to prepare an accurate and complete CPAR helps ensure better quality in the products and services we buy now and those we plan to buy in the future! Name: Date: Schedule # (for GSA orders): Contract Number: Order Number: Blocks 1 - 17: Registered Info is Accurate & Complete X Item Remarks Block 1: DUNS, FSC (PSC) and NAICS codes are correct. [NOTE: At some time auto-registration will be available for the civilian agency version of CPARS. When auto-

97

Contractor Past Performance Information  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Chapter 42.15 (DEC 2010) - Attachment A 2 Blocks 7, 9, 11, 12: Contracting Officer, Contract Completion Date, Awarded Value, and Current Contract Dollar Value are up to date. [Note: When auto-registration is available and used, the Contract Completion Date, Awarded Value, and Current Contract Dollar Value will be pre- populated from FPDS-NG.] Contract Completion Date and Awarded Value should include all option periods, even if the options have not yet been exercised. Block 15: Subcontractors performing 25% or more or a critical aspect of the work are identified. This block is not a place to assess subcontractor performance. Due to privity of contract, the Government can only write a performance assessment for a prime Contractor. Block 17: Contract Effort Description is

98

CONTRACTOR PURCHASING SYSTEM REVIEWS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Page 1 Page 1 APPENDIX C CONTRACTOR PURCHASING SYSTEM REVIEWS RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX RISK CATEGORY PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE COST HIGH (3) --Performance data casts significant doubt on the ability of the system or key process ability to meet requirements. A major disruption is highly probable and the likelihood is that the supplier will not achieve the performance, schedule or cost objectives · Delinquent end item delivery · Poor or nonexistent internal audit/self governance · Failure to meet socio-economic subcontract goals · Frequent overruns · Inadequate incoming inspection methods · Frequent late supplier deliveries<80% · Inadequate lead time provided to ensure on-time delivery of critical items · Inadequate subcontract

99

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

require authoization be obtained throught the SNL Foreign National Request (FNR) Security Plan (SP) electronic process. The Contractor and Subcontractor must notify their...

100

STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW) TEMPLATE FOR ICE SUPPORT CONTRACTOR  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ICE SUPPORT CONTRACTOR ICE SUPPORT CONTRACTOR The template presented below is a Statement of Work (SOW) for services of an ICE Support Contractor for assisting OECM in conducting an ICE. Project and review specific information should be incorporated. Explanatory text appears in italics, while information that should be selected appears in >. The format and contents of this SOW is not compulsory, and the use is at the discretion of the OECM Analysts, tailored as appropriate for the desired contractor support activities. If no contractor support is required, this appendix is not used. Statement of Work for Independent Cost Estimate (ICE) > <

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent verification contractor" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Meeting between Department of Energy Contractor and the Nuclear Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Meeting between Department of Energy Contractor and the Nuclear Meeting between Department of Energy Contractor and the Nuclear Energy Institute Regarding Proposed Revision of 10 CFR 810 Meeting between Department of Energy Contractor and the Nuclear Energy Institute Regarding Proposed Revision of 10 CFR 810 Pursuant to DOE's Guidance on Ex Parte Communications (74 Fed. Reg. 52,795; Oct. 14, 2009), this memorandum is to memorialize the meeting between a Department of Energy contractor (contractor) and the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), held on May 17, 2012. NEI_Ltr_6_11_2012.pdf More Documents & Publications Meeting Between the Department of Energy and the Nuclear Energy Institute Regarding Proposed Revision of 10 CFR 810 Ex Parte Meeting Between the Department of Energy and the Nuclear Energy Institute Regarding Section 934 of the Energy Independence and Security Act

102

Meeting between Department of Energy Contractor and the Nuclear Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

between Department of Energy Contractor and the Nuclear between Department of Energy Contractor and the Nuclear Energy Institute Regarding Proposed Revision of 10 CFR 810 Meeting between Department of Energy Contractor and the Nuclear Energy Institute Regarding Proposed Revision of 10 CFR 810 Pursuant to DOE's Guidance on Ex Parte Communications (74 Fed. Reg. 52,795; Oct. 14, 2009), this memorandum is to memorialize the meeting between a Department of Energy contractor (contractor) and the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), held on May 17, 2012. NEI_Ltr_6_11_2012.pdf More Documents & Publications Meeting Between the Department of Energy and the Nuclear Energy Institute Regarding Proposed Revision of 10 CFR 810 Ex Parte Meeting Between the Department of Energy and the Nuclear Energy Institute Regarding Section 934 of the Energy Independence and Security Act

103

Solar Contractor Licensing | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Solar Contractor Licensing Solar Contractor Licensing Solar Contractor Licensing < Back Eligibility Installer/Contractor Savings Category Solar Buying & Making Electricity Heating & Cooling Swimming Pool Heaters Water Heating Commercial Heating & Cooling Heating Program Info State Nevada Program Type Solar/Wind Contractor Licensing Provider Nevada State Contractors Board - Reno Nevada law requires that solar energy system installers be licensed by the Nevada State Contractors Board. Contractors may be licensed under License Classification C-37 (solar contracting for solar water heating and space heating and air conditioning). Contractors may also perform solar work under License Classification C-1* (plumbing and heating), sub-classification (d) for solar water heating installations, or

104

Neutronics, steady-state, and transient analyses for the Poland MARIA reactor for irradiation testing of LEU lead test fuel assemblies from CERCA : ANL independent verification results.  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The MARIA reactor at the Institute of Atomic Energy (IAE) in Swierk (30 km SE of Warsaw) in the Republic of Poland is considering conversion from high-enriched uranium (HEU) to low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel assemblies (FA). The FA design in MARIA is rather unique; a suitable LEU FA has never been designed or tested. IAE has contracted with CERCA (the fuel supply portion of AREVA in France) to supply 2 lead test assemblies (LTA). The LTAs will be irradiated in MARIA to burnup level of at least 40% for both LTAs and to 60% for one LTA. IAE may decide to purchase additional LEU FAs for a full core conversion after the test irradiation. The Reactor Safety Committee within IAE and the National Atomic Energy Agency in Poland (PAA) must approve the LTA irradiation process. The approval will be based, in part, on IAE submitting revisions to portions of the Safety Analysis Report (SAR) which are affected by the insertion of the LTAs. (A similar process will be required for the full core conversion to LEU fuel.) The analysis required was established during working meetings between Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) and IAE staff during August 2006, subsequent email correspondence, and subsequent staff visits. The analysis needs to consider the current high-enriched uranium (HEU) core and 4 core configurations containing 1 and 2 LEU LTAs in various core positions. Calculations have been performed at ANL in support of the LTA irradiation. These calculations are summarized in this report and include criticality, burn-up, neutronics parameters, steady-state thermal hydraulics, and postulated transients. These calculations have been performed at the request of the IAE staff, who are performing similar calculations to be used in their SAR amendment submittal to the PAA. The ANL analysis has been performed independently from that being performed by IAE and should only be used as one step in the verification process.

Garner, P. L.; Hanan, N. A. (Nuclear Engineering Division)

2011-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

105

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

U.S. DOE SECURITY CLEARANCES U.S. DOE SECURITY CLEARANCES Clearnce Home Initial Clearance Clearance Reinstate Clearance Upgrade Clearance Downgrade Clearance Extension Clearance Reciprocity Clearance Reinvestigation Clearance Termination Clearance Transfer Sandia National Laboratories sponsors and processes U.S. DOE Security Clearances for contractor personnel working on an authorized contract requiring access to classified information. Clearance Office Functions Contractor Pre-Process Background Review Certification Clearance File Change Drug Testing e-Fingerprinting Enrollment Process Maintaining a DOE Security Clearance During an Extended Absence DOE Personnel Security Reporting Requirements Data Report on Spouse/Cohabitant Name Change Change in Citizenship Contractor Clearance Tools Clearance Action Status Inquiries

106

ORISE: The Value of Independence, a white paper on DOE Order...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

verification an official requirement for contractors involved in decontamination and decommissioning (D&D) projects at former nuclear sites operated by DOE. In the white paper...

107

Executing major projects through Contractors  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Project based organizational structures are utilized in many industries. The firms engaged in these significant endeavors, project sponsor and contractor alike, risk both capital and reputation in the market-place with ...

McKenna, Nicholas A. (Nicholas Alan)

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

108

Independent Verification Survey Report for the Offsite Portion of the Potential Release Site-7 Abandoned Sanitary Line, Miamisburg Closure Project, Miamisburg, Ohio  

SciTech Connect

The ORISE objective was to confirm that the remedial action process implemented by the contractor was in accordance with the PRS-7 Work Package. Following removal of the sanitary line, the soil beneath the line would be sampled to determine if remediation was required (ARC 2007a).

P.C. Weaver

2008-08-15T23:59:59.000Z

109

Solar Contractor Licensing | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Solar Contractor Licensing Solar Contractor Licensing Solar Contractor Licensing < Back Eligibility Installer/Contractor Savings Category Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Solar Heating Buying & Making Electricity Water Heating Program Info State Florida Program Type Solar/Wind Contractor Licensing Provider Florida Solar Energy Industries Association Until 1994, Florida offered limited specialty licenses for residential solar hot water and pool heating, as well a general solar contractor's license. These specialty licenses have not been issued since that time, although people holding these licenses may renew them. The new solar contractor license defines a broader scope of work. With the new license, solar contractors have the authority to install, maintain and

110

Contractor Earned Value Management System Certification Status...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technology Centers Field Sites Power Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home Contractor Earned Value Management System Certification Status Contractor Earned...

111

Renewable Energy Contractor Licensing | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor Licensing Contractor Licensing Renewable Energy Contractor Licensing < Back Eligibility Installer/Contractor Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Solar Buying & Making Electricity Home Weatherization Water Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Heating Water Heating Wind Program Info State Oregon Program Type Solar/Wind Contractor Licensing Provider Department of Consumer and Business Services Oregon requires trade licenses for people installing solar energy equipment, and contractor licenses for the companies that do construction. Companies with an electrical contractor license may engage in the business of making electrical installations. Similarly a plumbing contractor license allows a company to engage in the business of making plumbing

112

STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW) TEMPLATE FOR ICR SUPPORT CONTRACTOR  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ICR SUPPORT CONTRACTOR ICR SUPPORT CONTRACTOR The template presented below is a Statement of Work (SOW) for services of an OECM ICR Support Contractor for assisting OCEM in performing an ICR. Project and review specific information should be incorporated. Explanatory text appears in italics, while information that should be selected appears in >. The format and contents of this SOW is not compulsory, and the use is at the discretion of the OECM Analysts, tailored as needed for the support required. If no contractor support is required, this appendix is not used. Statement of Work for Independent Cost Review (ICR) > <>

113

Solar Contractor Licensing | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Solar Contractor Licensing Solar Contractor Licensing Solar Contractor Licensing < Back Eligibility Installer/Contractor Savings Category Solar Buying & Making Electricity Heating & Cooling Swimming Pool Heaters Water Heating Commercial Heating & Cooling Heating Program Info State Arizona Program Type Solar/Wind Contractor Licensing Provider Registrar of Contractors The Arizona Registrar of Contractors does not offer a general solar electric contractor license, but the state's C-11/L-11 electrical license covers solar electric installations. C-11 licenses are required for electrical work on residential property and L-11 licenses apply to commercial installations. Contractors can also acquire a K-11 license to work on both residential and commercial installations. The Arizona Registrar of Contractors does have a specific plumbing license

114

Contractor Human Resources | National Nuclear Security Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Contractor Human Resources | National Nuclear Security Administration Contractor Human Resources | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Contractor Human Resources Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Contractor Human Resources Contractor Human Resources Welcome The Contractor Human Resources mission is to provide expert advice and

115

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

RESPONSIBILITIES RESPONSIBILITIES FSO Overview FSO Reporting Responsibilities Questions an FSOs at a Non-Possesssing Site Could Be Asked During an Audit Non-Possessing Contractor Security Requirements Plan Training for Facility Security Officers (FSOs) PHY-210DE Facility Security Officer Overview PHY-210DB, Introduction to Facility Security Officer (Self-Study Course ) Duration: 3 days Description: This correspondence course provides an overview of the roles and responsibilities of the DOE or DOE-contractor FSO. The course emphasizes facility clearance requirements, personnel security, information security, incident reporting, and other related programs. The course references the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM) (DoD 5220.22-M) and a comprehensive listing of DOE orders, manuals, guides, forms, and notices.

116

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Software Quality Assurance Plan Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect

This report provides an evaluation of the Software Quality Assurance Plan. The Software Quality Assurance Plan is intended to ensure all actions necessary for the software life cycle; verification and validation activities; documentation and deliverables; project management; configuration management, nonconformance reporting and corrective action; and quality assessment and improvement have been planned and a systematic pattern of all actions necessary to provide adequate confidence that a software product conforms to established technical requirements; and to meet the contractual commitments prepared by the sponsor; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Kent Norris

2010-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

117

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Software Quality Assurance Plan Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect

This report provides an evaluation of the Software Quality Assurance Plan. The Software Quality Assurance Plan is intended to ensure all actions necessary for the software life cycle; verification and validation activities; documentation and deliverables; project management; configuration management, nonconformance reporting and corrective action; and quality assessment and improvement have been planned and a systematic pattern of all actions necessary to provide adequate confidence that a software product conforms to established technical requirements; and to meet the contractual commitments prepared by the sponsor; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Kent Norris

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

118

Contractor Past Performance Information | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Past Performance Information Attachment FY2011-24 OPAM Policy Flash 2013-70 Acqusition Guides 42.15 Contractor Performance Infromation and 42.16 reporting Other Contractor...

119

Contractor Past Performance Information | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ACQGUIDE42.16-OPAM Policy Flash 2013-70 Acqusition Guides 42.15 Contractor Performance Infromation and 42.16 reporting Other Contractor Performance into Federal Awardee Performance...

120

Contractor Assurance Systems | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Contractor Assurance Systems Contractor Assurance Systems Deputy Director for Field Operations Deputy Director Home Mission & Functions Deputy Director Biography Organization Oversight Contractor Assurance Systems Who We Are Operations Improvement Committee Contact Information Deputy Director for Field Operations U.S. Department of Energy SC-3/Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-5434 F: (202) 586-4120 E: sc.science@science.doe.gov Oversight Contractor Assurance Systems Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page What is Contractor Assurance? This is a contractor-designed and utilized system to manage performance consistent with contract requirements. Once implemented, it will be used as a framework that engages the corporate parent to assess performance,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent verification contractor" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Comments on Contractor Employee Pension and Medical Benefits...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on Contractor Employee Pension and Medical Benefits Challenge Comments on Contractor Employee Pension and Medical Benefits Challenge Comments on Contractor Employee...

122

Audit of the Department of Energy's Contractor Liability Insurance...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor Liability Insurance Costs, IG-0396 Audit of the Department of Energy's Contractor Liability Insurance Costs, IG-0396 Audit of the Department of Energy's Contractor...

123

Contractor Political Activity Q&A  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

activities on DOE facilities or using DOE email addresses. The following Q&A relates to contractors' use of Government property for political activity. Please ensure that your contractors are aware of and respect these limitations. Contractor Political Activity Q: Are DOE contractors permitted to use Government property or facilities to conduct political activity? A: No, political activity is not an authorized use of Government property or facilities and the Contracting Officer will not approve or allow its use. Q: Does DOE Order 203.1, which is entitled, "Limited Personal use of Government Office Equipment Including Information Technology" permit contractors limited use rights to conduct political activity on Government property?

124

Independent Oversight Review of Department of Energy Contractor...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and requirements. The most significant issue concerned the comprehensiveness of medical surveillance programs. Other issues included poorly defined and marginally...

125

Hiring Qualified Contractors | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Services » Energy Assurance » Emergency Preparedness » Community Services » Energy Assurance » Emergency Preparedness » Community Guidelines » Hiring Qualified Contractors Hiring Qualified Contractors Hiring Qualified Contractors No matter how urgent your need for repairs, take the time to hire the right contractors to help you rebuild your home/business. You may need to hire certified technicians to assess your home/business for possible structural, electrical, or natural gas-related safety issues before restoring energy supplies. You may also encounter dishonest or unqualified contractors trying to take advantage of disaster victims. Learn all you can about restoration requirements and your contractor-especially if he or she solicits you. Contact your local city or county building inspectors for information on structural safety codes and standards that may govern the

126

Software developed by DOE contractors, national laboratories...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

by DOE contractors, national laboratories, and other facilities available from the Energy Science and Technology Software Center The Energy Science and Technology Software Center...

127

PNNL: Procurement: Contractor Environment, Safety & Health: Manuals  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Search PNNL Home About Research Publications Jobs News Contacts Business Contractor Environment, Safety & Health PNNL Visitor Orientation PNNL Visitors Guide Manuals PNNL...

128

Contractor Fee Payments - Portsmouth Paducah Project Office ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- LATA of Kentucky Paducah Infrastructure Support Portsmouth D&D Operation of DUF6 Portsmouth Facility Support Services More Documents & Publications Contractor Fee...

129

Solar Contractor Licensing | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

general plumbing contractors carrying an S210 license are authorized to install solar thermal systems. The Division has also established solar-specific license classifications....

130

Policy Memo: Working Effectively with Contractors | Department...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Documents & Publications CompliancePoliciesGuidanceContractorForceRestructuring.pdf Policy Flash 2013-07 Fiscal Year's (FY) 2011 and 2012 Balanced Scorecard Guidance for...

131

INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION SURVEY REPORT FOR EXPOSURE UNITS Z2-24, Z2-31, Z2-32, AND Z2-36 IN ZONE 2 OF THE EAST TENNESSEE TECHNOLOGY PARK OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management selected Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU), through the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) contract, to perform independent verification (IV) at Zone 2 of the East Tennessee Technology Park (ETTP) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. ORAU has concluded IV surveys, per the project-specific plan (PSP) (ORAU 2013a) covering exposure units (EUs) Z2-24, -31, -32, and -36. The objective of this effort was to verify the following. • Target EUs comply with requirements in the Zone 2 Record of Decision (ROD) (DOE 2005), as implemented by using the dynamic verification strategy presented in the dynamic work plan (DWP) (BJC 2007) • Commitments in the DWP were adequately implemented, as verified via IV surveys and soil sampling The Zone 2 ROD establishes maximum remediation level (RLmax) values and average RL (RLavg) values for the primary contaminants of concern (COCs) U-234, U-235, U-238, Cs-137, Np-237, Ra-226, Th-232, arsenic, mercury, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Table 1.1 lists Zone 2 COCs with associated RLs. Additional radiological and chemical contaminants were also identified during past characterization and monitoring actions, though the ROD does not present RLs for these potential contaminants. IV activities focused on the identification and quantification of ROD-specific COCs in surface soils, but also generated data for other analytes to support future decisions. ORAU personnel also reviewed EU-specific phased construction completion reports (PCCRs) to focus IV activities and identify potential judgmental sample locations, if any.

none,

2013-10-10T23:59:59.000Z

132

EM Contractor Fee Payments | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor Fee Payments Contractor Fee Payments EM Contractor Fee Payments In the interest of furthering transparency in its government operations, the Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) herein is releasing information relating to fee payments under its major cost-reimbursable contracts. Charts delineating fees that are paid under cost-plus-award-fee (CPAF), cost-plus-incentive-fee (CPIF), and cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) contracts are listed by site location in the following hyperlinks. With CPFF contracts, the fee is negotiated and fixed at the inception of the contract. The fixed fee will not vary with the actual costs that the contractor incurs. In general, the contractor earns fee either by completing the work called for in the contract or devoting a specified

133

PARS II 104 Contractor Monthly Upload  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 7, 2011 (V1.3) July 7, 2011 (V1.3) PARS II 104 Contractor Monthly Upload 2 July 7, 2011 (V1.3) PARS II 104 Contractor Monthly Upload Course Objectives * Upon completion of this course, users will be able to: - Navigate in the PARS II application - Select a Project to update - Update Project data by performing * An Upload of the latest monthly project performance data extracted from the contractor's local Earned Value Management System (EVMS) * Replace the current or a prior monthly upload in response to feedback or to correct data - Verify the success of the upload - View and interpret the import log generated by the upload process 3 July 7, 2011 (V1.3) PARS II 104 Contractor Monthly Upload Overview PARS II 4 July 7, 2011 (V1.3) PARS II 104 Contractor Monthly Upload PARS II Overview * Commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) product

134

Interim Letter Report - Verification Survey of Partial Grid E9, David Witherspoon, Inc. 1630 Site Knoxville, Tennessee  

SciTech Connect

Conduct verification surveys of available grids at the DWI 1630 in Knoxville, Tennessee. A representative with the Independent Environmental Assessment and Verification (IEAV) team from ORISE conducted a verification survey of a partial area within Grid E9.

P.C. Weaver

2008-06-12T23:59:59.000Z

135

Solar/Wind Contractor Licensing | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Solar/Wind Contractor Licensing Solar/Wind Contractor Licensing < Solar Jump to: navigation, search Some states have established a licensing process for solar-energy contractors and/or wind-energy contractors. These requirements are designed to ensure that contractors have the necessary knowledge and experience to install systems properly. Solar licenses typically take the form of either a separate, specialized solar contractor's license, or a specialty classification under a general electrical or plumbing license. [1] Solar/Wind Contractor Licensing Incentives CSV (rows 1 - 24) Incentive Incentive Type Place Applicable Sector Eligible Technologies Active Alternative Energy System Contracting (Virginia) Solar/Wind Contractor Licensing Virginia Installer/Contractor Photovoltaics No

136

Idaho Cleanup Contractor Surpasses Significant Safety Milestones |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cleanup Contractor Surpasses Significant Safety Milestones Cleanup Contractor Surpasses Significant Safety Milestones Idaho Cleanup Contractor Surpasses Significant Safety Milestones April 29, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis CWI employees discuss safety procedures before they remove a spent nuclear fuel shipment from a shipping container. CWI employees discuss safety procedures before they remove a spent nuclear fuel shipment from a shipping container. IDAHO FALLS, Idaho - For the second time in a little over a year, employees with DOE contractor CH2M-WG Idaho (CWI) supporting EM at the Idaho site have achieved 1 million hours without a recordable injury. They also worked more than 1.7 million hours without a lost work-time injury. "Our focus is working with employees to keep each other safe," said CWI Environmental, Safety, and Health Vice President Kevin Daniels. "We

137

Staff and Contractors | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Staff and Contractors Staff and Contractors Staff and Contractors The Combined Federal Campaign (CFC), now in its 52nd year, is the world's largest and most successful annual charity drive. Learn how to give and be a part of helping the Energy Department reach its 2013 goal of $1.4 million. The Combined Federal Campaign (CFC), now in its 52nd year, is the world's largest and most successful annual charity drive. Learn how to give and be a part of helping the Energy Department reach its 2013 goal of $1.4 million. The Energy Department's staff and contractors are at the heart of everything we do -- and are the people responsible for turning our mission into actions that matter for all Americans. Learn more about your

138

Microsoft Word - updated Recipient Webinar Transcript - Contractor  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

under 'Download Templates", Microsoft Excel, you just double-click on that. You get a zip folder with two separate files in it, one for grant recipients and one for contractors....

139

List of Contractors to Support Anthrax Remediation  

SciTech Connect

This document responds to a need identified by private sector businesses for information on contractors that may be qualified to support building remediation efforts following a wide-area anthrax release.

Judd, Kathleen S.; Lesperance, Ann M.

2010-05-14T23:59:59.000Z

140

Meeting between Department of Energy Contractor and the Nuclear...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

between Department of Energy Contractor and the Nuclear Energy Institute Regarding Proposed Revision of 10 CFR 810 Meeting between Department of Energy Contractor and the Nuclear...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent verification contractor" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Contractor-specific Documentation & Information in PARS II |...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor-specific Documentation & Information in PARS II Contractor-specific Documentation & Information in PARS II DOE Office of Acquisition and Project Management established...

142

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEE PENSION AND MEDICAL...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEE PENSION AND MEDICAL BENEFITS March 2007. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEE PENSION AND MEDICAL BENEFITS March 2007. ENERGY...

143

Energy's Contractor Employee Pension and Medical Benefits Challenge...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy's Contractor Employee Pension and Medical Benefits Challenge Energy's Contractor Employee Pension and Medical Benefits Challenge Summary of Comments on the March 27, 2007,...

144

DOE Seeks Input On Addressing Contractor Pension and Medical...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Seeks Input On Addressing Contractor Pension and Medical Benefits Liabilities DOE Seeks Input On Addressing Contractor Pension and Medical Benefits Liabilities March 27, 2007 -...

145

Idaho Governor Praises DOE, Contractor Effort for Resuming Critical...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Governor Praises DOE, Contractor Effort for Resuming Critical Cleanup Project Idaho Governor Praises DOE, Contractor Effort for Resuming Critical Cleanup Project July 30, 2013 -...

146

Department of Energy Management and Operating Contractor Available...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Management and Operating Contractor Available Fees, IG-0390 Department of Energy Management and Operating Contractor Available Fees, IG-0390 ig-0390.pdf More...

147

Solar and Wind Contractor Licensing | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Heating Program Information Louisiana Program Type SolarWind Contractor Licensing All solar and wind energy installations must be performed by a contractor duly licensed by and...

148

Audit of Department of Energy Contractor Occupational Injury...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor Occupational Injury and Illness Reporting Practices, IG-0404 Audit of Department of Energy Contractor Occupational Injury and Illness Reporting Practices, IG-0404 Audit...

149

Audit of the Department of Energy's Management of Field Contractor...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor Employees Assigned to Headquarters and Other Federal Agencies, DOEIG-0414 Audit of the Department of Energy's Management of Field Contractor Employees Assigned to...

150

Contractor Statement of Work (SOW) Template for EIR  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statement of Work (SOW) Template for EIR Statement of Work (SOW) Template for EIR The template presented below is a Statement of Work (SOW) for services of an EIR Contractor for conducting an EIR. Project and review specific information should be incorporated. Explanatory text appears in italics, while information that should be selected appears in >. The format and contents of this SOW is not compulsory, and the use is at the discretion of the OECM Analysts. Statement of Work for External Independent Review (EIR) > <> > > Project Background Project Name:

151

DOE M&O Contractor Perspectives on Beyond Design Basis Event Analysis and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE M&O Contractor Perspectives on Beyond Design Basis Event DOE M&O Contractor Perspectives on Beyond Design Basis Event Analysis and Response DOE M&O Contractor Perspectives on Beyond Design Basis Event Analysis and Response September 20, 2013 Presenter: Ron Crone, Director Research Reactors Division UT-Battelle, LLC Oak Ridge National Laboratory HFIR serves a broad range of science and technology communities and will need to operate to at least 2040 until replacement capabiltiies are available DOE M&O Contractor Perspectives on Beyond Design Basis Event Analysis and Response More Documents & Publications Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - January 2013 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lockheed Martin Energy Research Corporation - EA-98-13 EIS-0373: Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Summary

152

Independent Verification: Essential Action to Assure Integrity ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... of frauds remains lodged in the public's consciousness and engenders ... Human Factor Concerns: Significant ergonomic issues have been raised ...

2010-03-19T23:59:59.000Z

153

Tennessee Electrical Contractor Witnesses Stabilization | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Tennessee Electrical Contractor Witnesses Stabilization Tennessee Electrical Contractor Witnesses Stabilization Tennessee Electrical Contractor Witnesses Stabilization April 2, 2010 - 11:31am Addthis Joshua DeLung David Andrews of Andrews AC Electric Inc., in Knoxville, Tenn., is one example of the small business owners who have flooded the state's Department of Human Services with positive feedback. David has seen his business go from layoffs to stabilization. As the economy has strengthened, so has his company. The DHS is responsible for awarding Recovery Act weatherization funding in Tennessee from the U.S. Department of Energy, and the effects of weatherization work in the Volunteer State are helping small businesses like David's prosper. "The weatherization contracts have helped us, and I have been able to

154

Fermilab | FRA Contractor Assurance System (CAS) | Home  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

FRA Contractor Assurance System (CAS) FRA Contractor Assurance System (CAS) photo The FRA CAS is governed by Section H.13 of the FNAL prime contract, executed by the FRA Board of Directors and implemented throughout the FNAL organization. This system provides reasonable assurance that the objectives of the contractor management systems below are being accomplished in accordance with the requirements of the contract. The Fermilab Assurance Council (AC) is a key element of the CAS. The members of the AC are Management System owners and/or major process owners. A major function of the AC is to identify and track issues that arise though an awareness of changes in the laboratory's operating environment, applicable laws and regulations, self-assessments and the various review processes of the laboratory. The AC executes this function through the FRA

155

Staff and Contractor Archive | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy.gov » Staff and Contractor Archive Energy.gov » Staff and Contractor Archive Staff and Contractor Archive RSS November 15, 2013 Time to Give: Energy Department Celebrates Kickoff of CFC 2013 The Energy Department's 2013 CFC goal is to raise $1.4 million for local, national and global charities -- and even small contributions go a long way toward reaching that goal. October 30, 2013 Cybersecurity Is Every Citizen's Responsibility The Energy Department plays a unique and critical role in promoting our nation's cybersecurity. But all Internet users can help prevent cyber threats by practicing safe online behavior. October 17, 2013 Message from the President to Federal Employees Today, the President released a letter to U.S. government employees thanking them for their service and welcoming them back to work after the

156

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Local Contractors Face an Enviable  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Local Local Contractors Face an Enviable Challenge to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Local Contractors Face an Enviable Challenge on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Local Contractors Face an Enviable Challenge on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Local Contractors Face an Enviable Challenge on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Local Contractors Face an Enviable Challenge on Delicious Rank Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Local Contractors Face an Enviable Challenge on Digg Find More places to share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Local Contractors Face an Enviable Challenge on AddThis.com... Better Buildings Residential Network Progress Stories Interviews

157

Hi-Lite: the convergence of compiler technology and program verification  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Formal program verification tools check that a program correctly implements its specification. Existing specification languages for well-known programming languages (Ada, C, Java, C#) have been developed independently from the programming language to ... Keywords: compiler technology, formal verification, testing

Johannes Kanig; Edmond Schonberg; Claire Dross

2012-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

158

Independent Oversight Review, Y-12 National Security Complex...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Y-12 National Security Complex - June 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Y-12 National Security Complex - June 2012 June 2012 Review of the Y-12 Implementation Verification Review...

159

Microsoft Word - updated Recipient Webinar Transcript - Contractor  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractors for Contractors for the April 1-10 Reporting Period Just to start, if you have any questions, you can enter them into the webinar. Questions will be answered as soon as possible following the webinar. In addition, questions can be submitted at any time to the Recovery Act Clearinghouse and we'll provide you that information during this presentation. In addition, this presentation, the presentation materials and tape of the webinar can be found on the DOE Recovery website under Help with FederalReporting.gov. Today we are going to cover some basic background on the Recovery Act. We'll talk about the reporting requirements. We'll talk specifically about jobs. We'll talk about FederalReporting.gov and registration and reporting options. We'll look at the available

160

Needs of Non Energy-Focused Contractors  

SciTech Connect

To better understand the informational needs of non energy-focused contractors, including what information they need to motivate them to become energy-focused, the BARA team studied the type of information provided by the national programs, trade associations, and manufacturers that were researched for the related technical report: Effective Communication of Energy Efficiency. While that report focused on the delivery method, format, and strategy of the information, this study examines the content being put forward.

Liaukus, C.

2012-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent verification contractor" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

DOE Announces New Policy for Contractor Benefit Reimbursements | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Policy for Contractor Benefit Reimbursements Policy for Contractor Benefit Reimbursements DOE Announces New Policy for Contractor Benefit Reimbursements April 27, 2006 - 10:32am Addthis WASHINGTON , DC - The Department of Energy (DOE) today announced new policy measures for the reimbursement of contractor pension and medical benefit plan costs that are based on sound business practices and market-based benchmarks for cost management. The Department will continue to reimburse contractors for costs for current and retired contractor employees' defined benefit pension plans and medical benefit plans under existing contract requirements. For new contractor employees, the Department will reimburse contractors for the costs of their market-based defined contribution pension plans (similar to 401(k)) and market-based medical benefit plans.

162

Reply Comments of Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group to...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group to DOE Notice of Inquiry Reply Comments of Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group to DOE Notice of Inquiry Reply comments by the ad hoc...

163

Audit of Department of Energy's Contractor Salary Increase Funds...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy's Contractor Salary Increase Funds, CR-B-97-02 Audit of Department of Energy's Contractor Salary Increase Funds, CR-B-97-02 cr-b-97-02.pdf More Documents &...

164

Audit Report Hanford Site Contractors' Use of Site Services,...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report Hanford Site Contractors' Use of Site Services, WR-B-99-03 Audit Report Hanford Site Contractors' Use of Site Services, WR-B-99-03 To operate the Hanford Site (Site),...

165

Spotlight on Austin, Texas: Let Your Contractor Be Your Guide...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 Spotlight on Austin, Texas: Let Your Contractor Be Your Guide for Big Rewards Workforce All About Contractors Austin Energy, a municipally owned utility, has a long history of...

166

Building America Expert Meeting Report: Transitioning Traditional HVAC Contractors to Whole House Performance Contractors  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report outlines findings resulting from a U.S. Department of Energy Building America expert meeting to determine how HVAC companies can transition from a traditional contractor status to a service provider for whole house energy upgrade contracting. IBACOS has embarked upon a research effort under the Building America Program to understand business impacts and change management strategies for HVAC companies. HVAC companies can implement these strategies in order to quickly transition from a 'traditional' heating and cooling contractor to a service provider for whole house energy upgrade contracting. Due to HVAC service contracts, which allow repeat interaction with homeowners, HVAC companies are ideally positioned in the marketplace to resolve homeowner comfort issues through whole house energy upgrades. There are essentially two primary ways to define the routes of transition for an HVAC contractor taking on whole house performance contracting: (1) Sub-contracting out the shell repair/upgrade work; and (2) Integrating the shell repair/upgrade work into their existing business. IBACOS held an Expert Meeting on the topic of Transitioning Traditional HVAC Contractors to Whole House Performance Contractors on March 29, 2011 in San Francisco, CA. The major objectives of the meeting were to: Review and validate the general business models for traditional HVAC companies and whole house energy upgrade companies Review preliminary findings on the differences between the structure of traditional HVAC Companies and whole house energy upgrade companies Seek industry input on how to structure information so it is relevant and useful for traditional HVAC contractors who are transitioning to becoming whole house energy upgrade contractors Seven industry experts identified by IBACOS participated in the session along with one representative from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). The objective of the meeting was to validate the general operational profile of an integrated whole house performance contracting company and identify the most significant challenges facing a traditional HVAC contractor looking to transition to a whole house performance contractor. To facilitate the discussion, IBACOS divided the business operations profile of a typical integrated whole house performance contracting company (one that performs both HVAC and shell repair/upgrade work) into seven Operational Areas with more detailed Business Functions and Work Activities falling under each high-level Operational Area. The expert panel was asked to review the operational profile or 'map' of the Business Functions. The specific Work Activities within the Business Functions identified as potential transition barriers were rated by the group relative to the value in IBACOS creating guidance ensuring a successful transition and the relative difficulty in executing.

Burdick, A.

2011-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

167

Statement of Work (SOW) Template (Combined EIR/ICE Support Contractor...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statement of Work (SOW) Template (Combined EIRICE Support Contractor) Statement of Work (SOW) Template (Combined EIRICE Support Contractor) Contractor SOW Template - EIR &...

168

Court denies review of contractor/utility feud: contractors fear denial sets precedent  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

On Jan. 27, the US Supreme Court refused to review a recent federal circuit court decision allowing a California public utility to enter into energy-related contractor activities; this may set a precedent for future related cases, according to an attorney for the contractor plaintiffs. The Supreme Court's refusal lets stand the 9th Federal Circuit Court of Appeals decision on Grason Electric Co. et al. vs. the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD). That decision allows SMUD - a public utility - to engage in energy-related businesses such as the installation of energy management systems and lighting retrofits, according to the attorney. The plaintiffs in the case, 13 electrical contractors in the Sacramento area, originally brought the case against SMUD on antitrust grounds because, they alleged, the utility was encroaching upon their businesses.

Poplett, J.

1986-02-03T23:59:59.000Z

169

Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor - June 2012 Contractor - June 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Contractor - June 2012 June 2012 Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Integrated Waste Treatment Unit Contractor Operational Readiness Review This report documents the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), independent review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project-Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (SBWTP-IWTU) contractor Operational Readiness Review (C-ORR). The review was conducted at the Idaho Site from February 27 to March 6, 2012. This report discusses the background, scope, results, and conclusions of the review, as well as opportunities for improvement (OFIs) and items identified for further

170

Guidelines on Airflow and Refrigerant Charge Verification and Diagnostics  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

GUIDELINES ON AIRFLOW AND GUIDELINES ON AIRFLOW AND REFRIGERANT CHARGE VERIFICATION AND DIAGNOSTICS Alliance for Residential Building Innovation David Springer, Davis Energy Group Context  Airflow and refrigerant charge defects in existing air conditioning systems are well documented  Failure to address these problems represents a missed opportunity for home performance contractors  To ensure cost-effective solutions, a systematic approach is needed to quickly and accurately diagnose and resolve problems  Target:  Home performance contractors  HVAC contractors & technicians The Impact of Defects Non-TXV TXV 15% duct leakage 1 -18.10% 23% low airflow -4.70% 50% condenser coil blockage -5.80% 50% evaporator coil blockage 2 -4.60% -4.20% 20% overcharge -3.50% -7.90%

171

Building America Expert Meeting Report: Transitioning Traditional HVAC Contractors to Whole House Performance Contractors  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transitioning Transitioning Traditional HVAC Contractors to Whole House Performance Contractors Arlan Burdick IBACOS, Inc. October 2011 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation,

172

City of Madison - Contractor Licensing | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Madison - Contractor Licensing of Madison - Contractor Licensing City of Madison - Contractor Licensing < Back Eligibility Installer/Contractor Savings Category Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Solar Heating Water Heating Program Info State Wisconsin Program Type Solar/Wind Contractor Licensing Provider City of Madison Although the State of Wisconsin does not have any specific laws for contractors dealing with renewable energy, the City of Madison has issued rules for contractor licensing and equipment standards for solar thermal installations. In the City's Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Code is a requirement for a Class A-4 license for "a person desiring to enter into the business of installing, altering or repairing active solar heating equipment" as well as fee and examination details. As a result of a

173

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Step 5b: Help Program Contractors  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

b: Help b: Help Program Contractors Obtain the Necessary Equipment to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Step 5b: Help Program Contractors Obtain the Necessary Equipment on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Step 5b: Help Program Contractors Obtain the Necessary Equipment on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Step 5b: Help Program Contractors Obtain the Necessary Equipment on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Step 5b: Help Program Contractors Obtain the Necessary Equipment on Delicious Rank Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Step 5b: Help Program Contractors Obtain the Necessary Equipment on Digg Find More places to share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Step 5b: Help Program Contractors Obtain the Necessary Equipment on

174

CRAD, Feedback and Continuous - Contractor - December 4, 2007 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Feedback and Continuous - Contractor - December 4, 2007 Feedback and Continuous - Contractor - December 4, 2007 CRAD, Feedback and Continuous - Contractor - December 4, 2007 December 4, 2007 Feedback and Continuous Improvement Inspection Criteria and Approach - Contractor (HSS CRAD 64-20) Contractor management has established a comprehensive and integrated contractor assurance system for ensuring the protection of the public, workers, environment and national security assets through continuous improvement for environment, safety, and health; safeguards and security; cyber security; and emergency management. The contractor's assurance system programs and processes are in accordance with the policy and key elements outlined in DOE Policy 226.1, Department of Energy Oversight Policy, DOE Order 226.1 A, Implementation of Department of Energy Oversight Policy,

175

Contractor-Specific Documentation & Information in PARS II  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor-Specific Documentation & Information in PARS II Contractor-Specific Documentation & Information in PARS II DOE Office of Acquisition and Project Management established guidelines for documentation that should be available within PARS II through contractor-specific records that are not linked to any specific project within PARS II. This guidance is applicable only to those contractors who are currently executing Active Post CD-2 Capital Asset Construction Project(s) that are reported in PARS II. Table below outlines specific documents that should be attached to the contractor record in PARS II as well as the party responsible for ensuring contractor record contains each specific document. DOCUMENT NAME DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION UPLOAD RESPONSIBILITY EVMS Systems Description Current contractor EVMS Systems Description document with all

176

Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) The CPAR assesses a contractor's performance, both positive and negative, and provides a record on a given contract during a specified period of time. Each assessment must be based on objective data (or measurable, subjective data when objective data is not available) supportable by program and contract management data. The CPARS process is designed with a series of checks-and-balances to facilitate the objective and consistent evaluation of contractor performance. Both Government and contractor perspectives are captured on the CPAR form. The opportunity to review/comment on the CPAR by the designated Government and contractor personnel together makes a complete CPAR.

177

Verification of Adaptive Systems  

SciTech Connect

Adaptive systems are critical for future space and other unmanned and intelligent systems. Verification of these systems is also critical for their use in systems with potential harm to human life or with large financial investments. Due to their nondeterministic nature and extremely large state space, current methods for verification of software systems are not adequate to provide a high level of assurance for them. The combination of stabilization science, high performance computing simulations, compositional verification and traditional verification techniques, plus operational monitors, provides a complete approach to verification and deployment of adaptive systems that has not been used before. This paper gives an overview of this approach.

Pullum, Laura L [ORNL; Cui, Xiaohui [New York Institute of Technology (NYIT); Vassev, Emil [Lero – The Irish Software Engineering Research Centre; Hinchey, Mike [Lero – The Irish Software Engineering Research Centre; Rouff, Christopher [Lockheed Martin Corporation; Buskens, Richard [Lockheed Martin Corporation

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

178

Experimental verification of quantum computations  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Quantum computers are expected to offer substantial speedups over their classical counterparts and to solve problems that are intractable for classical computers. Beyond such practical significance, the concept of quantum computation opens up new fundamental questions, among them the issue whether or not quantum computations can be certified by entities that are inherently unable to compute the results themselves. Here we present the first experimental verification of quantum computations. We show, in theory and in experiment, how a verifier with minimal quantum resources can test a significantly more powerful quantum computer. The new verification protocol introduced in this work utilizes the framework of blind quantum computing and is independent of the experimental quantum-computation platform used. In our scheme, the verifier is only required to generate single qubits and transmit them to the quantum computer. We experimentally demonstrate this protocol using four photonic qubits and show how the verifier can test the computer's ability to perform measurement-based quantum computations.

Stefanie Barz; Joseph F. Fitzsimons; Elham Kashefi; Philip Walther

2013-08-30T23:59:59.000Z

179

Licensee contractor and vendor inspection status report: Quarterly report, January--March 1996. Volume 20, Number 1  

SciTech Connect

A fundamental premise of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing and inspection program is that licensees are responsible for the proper construction and safe and efficient operation of their nuclear power plants. The Federal government and nuclear industry have established a system for the inspection of commercial nuclear facilities to provide for multiple levels of inspection and verification. Each licensee, contractor, and vendor participates in a quality verification process in compliance with requirements prescribed by the NRC`s rules and regulations (Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations). The NRC does inspections to oversee the commercial nuclear industry to determine whether its requirements are being met by licensees and their contractors, while the major inspection effort is performed by the industry within the framework of quality verification programs. This periodical covers the results of inspections performed by the NRC`s Special Inspection Branch, Vendor Inspection Section, that have been distributed to the inspected organizations during the period from January 1996 through March 1996.

NONE

1996-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

180

Licensee contractor and vendor inspection status report: Quarterly report, July--September 1997. Volume 21, Number 3  

SciTech Connect

A fundamental premise of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing and inspection program is that licensees are responsible for the proper construction and safe and efficient operation of their nuclear power plants. The Federal government and nuclear industry have established a system for the inspection of commercial nuclear facilities to provide for multiple levels of inspection and verification. Each licensee, contractor, and vendor participates in a quality verification process in compliance with requirements prescribed by the NRC`s rules and regulations (Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations). The NRC does inspections to oversee the commercial nuclear industry to determine whether its requirements are being met by licensees and their contractors, while the major inspection effort is performed by the industry within the framework of quality verification programs. This periodical covers the results if inspections that were performed by the NRC`s Special Inspection Branch, Vendor Inspection Section, and that were distributed to the inspected organizations during the period from July through September 1997.

NONE

1997-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent verification contractor" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

PARS II New Contractor Information for Interconnection Security Agreement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

New Contractor Information for Interconnection Security Agreement New Contractor Information for Interconnection Security Agreement V1.0 (November 18, 2010) The Department of Energy (DOE) Headquarters Program Cyber Security Plan (PCSP), dated February 2008, requires the Project Assessment and Reporting System (PARS) II System Owner and the contractor sign an Interconnection Security Agreement (ISA). The requirement for an Interconnection Security Agreement can be found on page 182 of the PCSP. The ISA template is available for review on the PARS II portal (http://management.energy.gov/online_resources/pars2.htm) under Contractor Documents. Before the contractor begins sending data to PARS II, DOE will send the ISA to the contractor for review and signature. In order to prepare the ISA for review and signature, the PARS II Support Team needs

182

DOE Seeks Input On Addressing Contractor Pension and Medical Benefits  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Input On Addressing Contractor Pension and Medical Input On Addressing Contractor Pension and Medical Benefits Liabilities DOE Seeks Input On Addressing Contractor Pension and Medical Benefits Liabilities March 27, 2007 - 12:10pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced in the Federal Register that it is seeking public comment on how to address the increasing costs and liabilities of contractor employee pension and medical benefits. Under the Department of Energy's unique Management and Operating and other site management contracts, DOE reimburses its contractors for allowable costs incurred in providing contractor employee pension and medical benefits to current employees and retirees. In FY2006, these costs reached approximately $1.1 billion - a more than 226 percent increase since FY2000 - and are expected to grow in future years.

183

Carlsbad Field Office Technical Assistance Contractor Shares In Top Honor |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Assistance Contractor Shares In Top Technical Assistance Contractor Shares In Top Honor Carlsbad Field Office Technical Assistance Contractor Shares In Top Honor July 1, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Members of the Carlsbad Technical Assistance Contractor discuss audit criteria for quality assurance implementation. Members of the Carlsbad Technical Assistance Contractor discuss audit criteria for quality assurance implementation. CARLSBAD, N.M. - The Carlsbad Field Office Technical Assistance Contractor's (CTAC) parent company, Portage, Inc., and its 400 employees nationwide recently achieved a significant milestone by exceeding one million hours worked over 560 days without a lost-time injury or illness. CTAC is a small group responsible for technical and quality assurance resources for the DOE Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO), which provides

184

Contractor List 2013-11-05.xls  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site Site Contractor 01-D-416 Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Office of River Protection Bechtel National Inc. 05-D-405 Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) Savannah River Site Parsons Infrastructure and Technology Group ID-0012B.C1 Idaho Spent Fuel Facility (ISFF) Project Idaho National Laboratory CH2M-WG Idaho, LLC ID-0014B.C2 Calcine Disposition Project (CDP) Idaho National Laboratory CH2M-WG Idaho, LLC IFDP Integrated Facility Disposition Project (IFDP) Oak Ridge TBD OR-0013B.C1 Sludge Processing Facility Buildouts Oak Ridge TBD OR-0040.C Nuclear Facility D&D - ETTP Oak Ridge TBD OR-0040.C1 K-25 D & D Oak Ridge URS / CH2M Hill Oak Ridge, LLC OR-0041.C Nuclear Facility D&D - Y-12 Oak Ridge TBD OR-0042.C Nuclear Facility D&D - ORNL Oak Ridge TBD OR-0042.R1.4

185

Staff and Contractor Archive | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2011 9, 2011 Auto industry workers retrain on wind installation in Elyria, Ohio | Energy Department Image | Photo by Quentin Kruger (Contractor) The American Jobs Act Last night the President laid out the American Jobs Act, a specific, tangible, bi-partisan strategy for putting Americans back to work. This plan will cut taxes for small businesses and put more money into the pockets of hard working Americans, without adding a dime to the Federal deficit. September 8, 2011 Secretary Chu Unveils 41 New Offshore Wind Power R&D Projects The $43 million dollars in offshore wind funding Secretary Chu announced today is part of a coordinated federal strategy to put the nation's wind resources to work and support innovation and jobs throughout the United States. September 2, 2011

186

Contractor: Contract Number: Contract Type: Total Estimated  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Number: Number: Contract Type: Total Estimated Contract Cost: Performance Period Total Fee Earned FY2008 $2,550,203 FY2009 $39,646,446 FY2010 $64,874,187 FY2011 $66,253,207 FY2012 $41,492,503 FY2013 $0 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 Cumulative Fee Earned $214,816,546 Fee Available $2,550,203 Minimum Fee $77,931,569 $69,660,249 Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC $458,687,779 $0 Maximum Fee Fee Information $88,851,963 EM Contractor Fee Site: Savannah River Site Office, Aiken, SC Contract Name: Management & Operating Contract September 2013 DE-AC09-08SR22470

187

2012 DOE/NNSA and Contractor  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Safety and Security Enforcement Workshop Safety and Security Enforcement Workshop Nuclear Safety Case Summaries Objective: Determine the NTS reportability for each case. Instructions: Read each case and determine: 1. Is there a nuclear nexus? 2. Are there any noncompliances? 3. Does the case meet any of the nuclear safety noncompliance reporting criteria? 4. If not, does the case meet any of the other nuclear safety reportable conditions? a. Repetitive Noncompliances b. Programmatic Issue c. Intentional Violation or Misrepresentation d. Substantiated worker retaliation with a nuclear safety nexus 5. Are there any other reasons to file an NTS report? 2012 DOE Safety and Security Enforcement Workshop Case 1: Cheating on Radworker Examinations A contractor employee taking his 2 year re-qualification Radiation Worker 1 examination was

188

UniSource Energy - Contractor Energy Efficiency Rebate Program (Arizona) |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

UniSource Energy - Contractor Energy Efficiency Rebate Program UniSource Energy - Contractor Energy Efficiency Rebate Program (Arizona) UniSource Energy - Contractor Energy Efficiency Rebate Program (Arizona) < Back Eligibility Construction Installer/Contractor Savings Category Home Weatherization Commercial Weatherization Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Cooling Sealing Your Home Ventilation Manufacturing Heat Pumps Appliances & Electronics Commercial Lighting Lighting Windows, Doors, & Skylights Maximum Rebate Air Sealing with Attic Insulation: $800 Duct Sealing: $350 (prescriptive); $650 (performance measured) Air Sealing: $250 Shade Screens or Solar Film: $250 Program Info State Arizona Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount BrightSave Home Energy Analysis: Discounted HVAC Replacement: $250

189

Audit of the Contractor Incentive Programs at the Rocky Flats...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, IG-0411 Audit of the Contractor Incentive Programs at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, IG-0411 Report on "Audit...

190

Portsmouth DUF6 Conversion Final EIS - Appendix H: Contractor...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Portsmouth DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS APPENDIX H: CONTRACTOR DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Disclosure Statement H-2 Portsmouth DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Disclosure Statement H-3 Portsmouth...

191

Contractor-Specific Documentation & Information in PARS II  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor-Specific Documentation & Information in PARS II DOE Office of Acquisition and Project Management established guidelines for documentation that should be available within...

192

Site: Contract Name: Contractor: Contract Number: Contract Type...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contract Name: Contractor: Contract Number: Contract Type: Total Estimated Contract Cost: Contract Period: Minimum Fee Maximum Fee Performance Period Fee Available Total Fee Paid...

193

City of Madison - Contractor Licensing (Wisconsin) | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

the City of Madison has issued rules for contractor licensing and equipment standards for solar thermal installations. In the City's Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Code...

194

City of Madison - Contractor Licensing | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the City of Madison has issued rules for contractor licensing and equipment standards for solar thermal installations. In the City's Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Code...

195

Contractor Statement of Work (SOW) Template (for EIR) | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

More Documents & Publications Statement of Work (SOW) Template (Combined EIRICE Support Contractor) EIR SOP Septmebr 2010 Microsoft Word - EIR SOP Updated 101110 frank...

196

Interview: LaborWorks@NeighborWorks Provides Vermont Contractors...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Focus Series LaborWorks@NeighborWorks Provides Vermont Contractors With Help When They Need It NeighborWorks of Western Vermont (NWWVT), a nonprofit home ownership organization...

197

Approval of Contractor Executive Salaries by Department of Energy...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

is responsible for oversight of the UCOR contract, including analyzing and performing market analyses to assess the reasonableness of the proposed contractor executive salaries....

198

Plug-In Electric Vehicle Handbook for Electrical Contractors (Brochure)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This handbook answers basic questions about plug-in electric vehicles, charging stations, charging equipment, charging equipment installation, and training for electrical contractors.

Not Available

2012-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

199

Better Buildings: Workforce, Spotlight on Maine: Contractor Sales...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

visit betterbuildings.energy.govneighborhoods. Spotlight on Maine: Contractor Sales Training Boosts Energy Upgrade Conversions When Efficiency Maine launched a new residential...

200

Management and Operating Contractors' Subcontract Audit Coverage, IG-0885  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Management and Operating Management and Operating Contractors' Subcontract Audit Coverage DOE/IG-0885 April 2013 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 April 17, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Special Report on "Management and Operating Contractors' Subcontract Audit Coverage" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy (Department) employs 28 Management and Operating (M&O) contractors that perform essential mission work under cost reimbursable contracts. To achieve the Department's mission, M&O contractors often utilize the services of subcontractors, which

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent verification contractor" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate its Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory July 3, 2008 - 2:15pm...

202

Independent Oversight, Nevada National Security Site - March 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oversight, Nevada National Security Site - March 2012 Oversight, Nevada National Security Site - March 2012 Independent Oversight, Nevada National Security Site - March 2012 March 2012 Review of the Nevada National Security Site Implementation Verification Review Processes This report documents the independent review of implementation verification review (IVR) processes at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), which is within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations from February 6 to 15, 2012. Independent Oversight, Nevada National Security Site - March 2012 More Documents & Publications CRAD, Implementation Verification Review - July 20, 2011

203

Final Report - Independent Confirmatory Survey Summary and Results for the Hematite Decommissioning Project  

SciTech Connect

The objectives of the confirmatory surveys were to provide independent contractor field data reviews and to generate independent radiological data for use by the NRC in evaluating the adequacy and accuracy of the licensee’s procedures and survey results.

E.N. Bailey

2009-03-18T23:59:59.000Z

204

Dynamic competition model for construction contractors  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Dynamic competition in an industry has been an interest of practitioners and researchers because of the expectation that sound understanding of competition in a dynamic way enables a firm to compete better. This dynamic approach considers a firm as an entity in a dynamic system, in which every entity is a profit optimizer responding to market conditions as well as its competitors' actions. In construction, the issue of competition has been focused on competitive bidding, which is a critical mechanism for a contractor to obtain jobs and to generate profits by performing them. Since Friedman's competitive bidding model (1956), various approaches have been developed to improve earlier models. The objective of most models is to find the optimum markup to maximize the expected profit from a firm's perspective. However, to better understand competition in the market, there is the need to analyze this issue from a market perspective. The market perspective provides the consideration about market equilibrium. From previous models and other competition studies, critical missing concepts were identified. In order to find efficient policies that enable a firm to outperform its competitors and to provide an analytical framework of understanding dynamic competition, a system dynamics model has been developed based on the identified concepts. In this model, there are three managerial areas in which a contractor makes policy: 1) markup; 2) marketing; and 3) capacity. Each firm's backlog level is considered as a basic input to its policy making. N firms are equally exposed to demand uncertainty. As an optimizer, each firm applies its policies responding to changes in the market to keep its operations efficient. Firms' responses to market changes are simulated and analyzed and their dynamic feedback was studied. Test results show how difficult it is for a firm to obtain a competitive advantage competing with its competitors due to their reactions. This is different from the previous models that determine a better policy based on assumed static condition and ignorance of competitors' reactions. The test results also show the possibility that one firm can outperform its competitors by using different policies based on accurate market forecasts.

Kim, Hyung Jin

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

205

Treaty Verification | ornl.gov  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Verification SHARE Treaty Verification ORNL is a strong contributor to future nonproliferation and arms control initiatives through research and development of radiation...

206

Puerto Rico - Solar and Wind Contractor Certification | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Puerto Rico - Solar and Wind Contractor Certification Puerto Rico - Solar and Wind Contractor Certification Puerto Rico - Solar and Wind Contractor Certification < Back Eligibility Installer/Contractor Savings Category Solar Buying & Making Electricity Wind Program Info Program Type Solar/Wind Contractor Licensing Provider Energy Affairs Administration In October 2008, the Energy Affairs Administration (EAA) of Puerto Rico adopted regulations for the certification of photovoltaic (PV) systems and installers in response to the passing of Act No. 248, which required that PV systems be certified and installed by certified installers in order to be eligible for the newly established tax credits (that have since been repealed). With the passing of this regulation, only certified installers may install photovoltaic (PV) systems in Puerto Rico. In January 2010,

207

Hanford Contractor Receives Awards for Safety | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor Receives Awards for Safety Contractor Receives Awards for Safety Hanford Contractor Receives Awards for Safety September 30, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis RICHLAND, Wash. - A Hanford site contractor supporting EM's cleanup program has again received a prestigious safety award from DOE's Voluntary Protection Program (VPP). Advanced Technologies and Laboratories International (ATL) was presented the Star of Excellence Award for safety at the 29th annual VPP Participants Association Conference in Nashville, Tenn. Since it became a prime contractor at Hanford in 2005, ATL has received the award twice for committing to the principles of VPP, reaching established safety and health goals and attaining an injury and illness rate well below the average for similar businesses. ATL also received the 2013 Outreach Award alongside other Hanford prime

208

EM Sees Growth Across Complex in Partnering Agreements with Contractors |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sees Growth Across Complex in Partnering Agreements with Sees Growth Across Complex in Partnering Agreements with Contractors EM Sees Growth Across Complex in Partnering Agreements with Contractors May 30, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Representatives of DOE Savannah River Operations Office and liquid waste contractor Savannah River Remediation sign the next generation partnering agreement. Representatives of DOE Savannah River Operations Office and liquid waste contractor Savannah River Remediation sign the next generation partnering agreement. AIKEN, S.C. - DOE Savannah River Operations Office Manager Dave Moody views the partnering relationship between his office and liquid waste contractor Savannah River Remediation (SRR) as an opportunity to view cleanup work from each other's point of view. "While both DOE and SRR continue to work well together, the partnering

209

EM Sees Growth Across Complex in Partnering Agreements with Contractors |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EM Sees Growth Across Complex in Partnering Agreements with EM Sees Growth Across Complex in Partnering Agreements with Contractors EM Sees Growth Across Complex in Partnering Agreements with Contractors May 30, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Representatives of DOE Savannah River Operations Office and liquid waste contractor Savannah River Remediation sign the next generation partnering agreement. Representatives of DOE Savannah River Operations Office and liquid waste contractor Savannah River Remediation sign the next generation partnering agreement. AIKEN, S.C. - DOE Savannah River Operations Office Manager Dave Moody views the partnering relationship between his office and liquid waste contractor Savannah River Remediation (SRR) as an opportunity to view cleanup work from each other's point of view. "While both DOE and SRR continue to work well together, the partnering

210

Idaho Site Contractor Achieves Treatment Project Milestone | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor Achieves Treatment Project Milestone Contractor Achieves Treatment Project Milestone Idaho Site Contractor Achieves Treatment Project Milestone March 19, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis IDAHO FALLS, Idaho - The Idaho site's main cleanup contractor recently achieved a major performance milestone by successfully passing an operational readiness review for a first-of-a-kind facility that will treat the remaining 900,000 gallons of liquid radioactive waste generated by the site's legacy cleanup mission. CH2M-WG Idaho's (CWI) Contractor Operational Readiness Review for the Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (IWTU) focused on plant equipment and systems, management competency, personnel operational proficiency, procedures and emergency response to validate operational preparedness. The 16-member team that completed the review identified nine pre-start

211

Hanford Contractor Receives Awards for Safety | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Contractor Receives Awards for Safety Hanford Contractor Receives Awards for Safety Hanford Contractor Receives Awards for Safety September 30, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis RICHLAND, Wash. - A Hanford site contractor supporting EM's cleanup program has again received a prestigious safety award from DOE's Voluntary Protection Program (VPP). Advanced Technologies and Laboratories International (ATL) was presented the Star of Excellence Award for safety at the 29th annual VPP Participants Association Conference in Nashville, Tenn. Since it became a prime contractor at Hanford in 2005, ATL has received the award twice for committing to the principles of VPP, reaching established safety and health goals and attaining an injury and illness rate well below the average for similar businesses. ATL also received the 2013 Outreach Award alongside other Hanford prime

212

WIPP Security Contractor Receives DOE Voluntary Protection Program Award |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor Receives DOE Voluntary Protection Program Contractor Receives DOE Voluntary Protection Program Award WIPP Security Contractor Receives DOE Voluntary Protection Program Award October 24, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Site Operations Director Casey Gadbury (right) and Farok Sharif, President and Project Manager for Nuclear Waste Partnership LLC, the management and operating contractor at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, present the DOE's Voluntary Protection Program Legacy Star Award to Richard De Los Santos, protective force manager for Security Walls, the security contractor at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. The DOE-VPP legacy star award is the highest level of recognition possible in the VPP. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Site Operations Director Casey Gadbury

213

Solar and Wind Contractor Licensing | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Solar and Wind Contractor Licensing Solar and Wind Contractor Licensing Solar and Wind Contractor Licensing < Back Eligibility Installer/Contractor Savings Category Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Solar Heating Buying & Making Electricity Water Heating Wind Program Info State Connecticut Program Type Solar/Wind Contractor Licensing Provider Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection The Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection (DCP) is authorized to issue licenses for solar-thermal work, solar-electric work and wind-electric work. "Solar thermal work" is defined as "the installation, erection, repair, replacement, alteration, or maintenance of active, passive and hybrid solar systems that directly convert ambient energy into heat or convey, store or distribute such ambient energy." Solar electricity

214

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Contractor Records Custodian Authorization  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor Records Custodian Authorization Contractor Records Custodian Authorization SECTION I. Authorization Information Pursuant to DOE Order 243.1B, Records Management Program, Attachment 1, Contractor Requirements Document, (Name) , employee of (contractor organization) , is hereby authorized to function as a Contractor Records Custodian for (DOE Element) . The incumbent responsibilities include complying with the requirements of the noted Contract Requirements Document (CRD), including flowing down the requirements of the CRD to subcontractors to ensure full compliance with all requirements. He/she will ensure they review, are familiar with, and understand the requirements of DOE Order 243.1B and the associated CRD prior to and during their performance of their records custodian duties.

215

Enforcement Letter, Geiger Brothers Mechanical Contractors, INC - March 26,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Geiger Brothers Mechanical Contractors, INC - Geiger Brothers Mechanical Contractors, INC - March 26, 2010 Enforcement Letter, Geiger Brothers Mechanical Contractors, INC - March 26, 2010 March 26, 2010 Enforcement Letter issued to Geiger Brothers Mechanical Contractors, Inc. related to Installation and Inspection of Penetration Fire Seals at the DUF6 Conversion Building at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant This letter refers to the Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement investigation into the facts and circumstances associated with deficiencies in the installation and inspection of penetration fire seals at the DUF6 Conversion Building, located at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant. DOE's investigation report, dated January 22, 2009, was provided to Geiger Brothers Mechanical Contractors, Inc. (Geiger) under

216

Solar Hot Water Contractor Licensing | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hot Water Contractor Licensing Hot Water Contractor Licensing Solar Hot Water Contractor Licensing < Back Eligibility Installer/Contractor Savings Category Heating & Cooling Solar Water Heating Program Info State Arkansas Program Type Solar/Wind Contractor Licensing Arkansas offers several limited, specialty licenses for solar thermal installers under the general plumbing license. There are three specialty classifications available for solar thermal installers: a Restricted Solar Mechanic license, a Supervising Solar Mechanic license, and a Solar Mechanic Trainee classification. Installers with a Restricted Solar Mechanic license can install and maintain systems used to heat domestic hot water, but are not allowed to perform any other plumbing work. Individuals holding a Supervising Solar Mechanic license are able to supervise, install

217

Solar Hot Water Contractor Licensing | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Solar Hot Water Contractor Licensing Solar Hot Water Contractor Licensing Solar Hot Water Contractor Licensing < Back Eligibility Installer/Contractor Savings Category Heating & Cooling Solar Water Heating Program Info State Maine Program Type Solar/Wind Contractor Licensing In order to be eligible for Maine's solar thermal rebate program, systems must be installed by licensed plumbers who have received additional certification for solar thermal systems from the North American Board of Certified Energy Practitioners (NABCEP). The state solar thermal rebate program maintains a list of Efficiency Maine registered vendors/installers. In addition, Efficiency Maine has information for vendors interested in becoming registered and listed on the [http://www.efficiencymaine.com/at-home/registered-vendor-locator web

218

MEMORANDUM FOR DOE PAAA COORDINATORS CONTRACTOR PAAA COORDINATORS |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MEMORANDUM FOR DOE PAAA COORDINATORS CONTRACTOR PAAA COORDINATORS MEMORANDUM FOR DOE PAAA COORDINATORS CONTRACTOR PAAA COORDINATORS MEMORANDUM FOR DOE PAAA COORDINATORS CONTRACTOR PAAA COORDINATORS The DOE Office of Enforcement and Investigation (EH Enforcement) invoked a 120-day suspension of PAAA enforcement actions for issues associated with contractor Internal Dose Evaluation Programs (IDEP). Prior to initiation of the suspension, EH Enforcement had identified deficiencies in DOEcontractor implemented bioassay programs at numerous sites within the DOE complex. The commonality of the IDEP deficiencies at the various sites, as well as the possibility of the existence of similar deficiencies at other DOE sites, led EH Enforcement to the conclusion that a suspension of enforcement actions would be appropriate to provide DOE-contractors an opportunity to review their own

219

Independent Oversight Appraisal Process Protocols  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND OVERSIGHT OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND OVERSIGHT INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT PROGRAM APPRAISAL PROCESS PROTOCOLS November 2012 Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Independent Oversight Program Appraisal Process Protocols Preface November 2012 i Preface The Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), is responsible for implementing an Independent Oversight Program for safety and security within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in accordance with DOE Orders 227.1, Independent Oversight Program, and 226.1B, Implementation of Department of Energy Oversight Policy. Effective oversight, including independent oversight, of DOE Federal and contractor operations is an integral element of the

220

Independent Oversight Appraisal Process Protocols  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND OVERSIGHT OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND OVERSIGHT INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT PROGRAM APPRAISAL PROCESS PROTOCOLS November 2012 Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Independent Oversight Program Appraisal Process Protocols Preface November 2012 i Preface The Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), is responsible for implementing an Independent Oversight Program for safety and security within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in accordance with DOE Orders 227.1, Independent Oversight Program, and 226.1B, Implementation of Department of Energy Oversight Policy. Effective oversight, including independent oversight, of DOE Federal and contractor operations is an integral element of the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent verification contractor" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Contractor - June 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Contractor - June 2012 June 2012 Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Integrated Waste Treatment Unit Contractor Operational Readiness Review This report documents the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), independent review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project-Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (SBWTP-IWTU) contractor Operational Readiness Review (C-ORR). The review was conducted at the Idaho Site from February 27 to March 6, 2012. This report discusses the background, scope, results, and conclusions of the review, as well as

222

Commissioning/ verification : Daylighting The New York Times Building  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Commissioning/ verification Commissioning/ verification Overview The architectural approach The owner's approach Daylighting field study Daylighting control systems Automated roller shades Procurement specifications Shades and Shade Controls Lighting Controls Visualizing daylight Commissioning/ verification Demand response Mainstream solutions Post-occupancy evaluation Publications Sponsors Project team Commissioning/ verification The construction cycle of the building life cycle is the time when the design intent is translated into a physical reality. Given novel integrated systems with which contractors (vendors, installers, commissioning (Cx) agents, etc.) do not have much experience, there is a risk that carefully laid plans will go amiss. To insure that the automated shading and daylighting control systems were installed and operating as intended, the manufacturers, LBNL, and the Times Company developed procedures to commission and verify system performance. With verification data resulting from these procedures, the Times Company possessed the unique capability to measure and compare performance to design intent then discuss and tune system performance with the manufacturer prior to closure of the work scope and occupancy of the building.

223

Verification Checklist Home Address: City: State: Zip:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Indoor airPLUS Version 1 (Rev. 01) Verification Checklist Home Address: City: State: Zip: Section Requirements (Refer to full Indoor airPLUS Construction Specifications for details) Must Correct Builder Verified Rater Verified N/A Note: The Rev. 01 checklist has been modified to reflect only the additional Indoor airPLUS requirements and their corresponding section numbers that must be met after completing the ENERGY STAR checklists. ENERGY STAR remains a prerequisite for Indoor airPLUS certification. ENERGY STAR V3 Checklists Thermal Enclosure System Rater Checklist completed. o o Water Management System Builder Checklist completed. o o HVAC System Quality Installation Contractor Checklist completed. o o HVAC System Quality Installation Rater Checklist completed. o o

224

CRAD, Implementation Verification Review - July 20, 2011 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Implementation Verification Review - July 20, 2011 Implementation Verification Review - July 20, 2011 CRAD, Implementation Verification Review - July 20, 2011 July 20, 2011 Implementation Verification Review of Safety Basis Hazard Controls (HSS CRAD 45-39, Rev. 1) The Implementation Verification Review (IVR) inspection will evaluate the effectiveness of processes for independently verifying and re-verifying implementation of the safety basis hazard controls at the site's nuclear facilities and associated site office oversight methodology. The inspection will consist of an evaluation of the procedures and processes that establish the IVR or similar process, as well as an evaluation of IVR or similar processes implementation and oversight. Review of implementation at a site may include any or all of the following activities:

225

National Nuclear Security Administration Contractor Governance, IG-0881  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Nuclear Security Administration National Nuclear Security Administration Contractor Governance DOE/IG-0881 February 2013 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits & Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 February 19, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE ACTING ADMINISTRATOR, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "National Nuclear Security Administration Contractor Governance" INTRODUCTION Since July 2007, the Department of Energy (Department) and the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) have required contractors to implement self-assessment systems to measure performance and help ensure effective and efficient mission accomplishment. Each

226

Integrated safety management system verification: Volume 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Department of Energy (DOE) Policy (P) 450.4, Safety Management System Policy, commits to institutionalization of an Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) throughout the DOE complex. The DOE Acquisition Regulations (DEAR, 48 CFR 970) requires contractors to manage and perform work in accordance with a documented Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS). Guidance and expectations have been provided to PNNL by incorporation into the operating contract (Contract DE-ACM-76FL0 1830) and by letter. The contract requires that the contractor submit a description of their ISMS for approval by DOE. PNNL submitted their proposed Safety Management System Description for approval on November 25,1997. RL tentatively approved acceptance of the description pursuant to a favorable recommendation from this review. The Integrated Safety Management System Verification is a review of the adequacy of the ISMS description in fulfilling the requirements of the DEAR and the DOE Policy. The purpose of this review is to provide the Richland Operations Office Manager with a recommendation for approval of the ISMS description of the Pacific Northwest Laboratory based upon compliance with the requirements of 49 CFR 970.5204(-2 and -78); and to verify the extent and maturity of ISMS implementation within the Laboratory. Further the review will provide a model for other DOE laboratories managed by the Office of Assistant Secretary for Energy Research.

Christensen, R.F.

1998-08-10T23:59:59.000Z

227

Modular data structure verification  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This dissertation describes an approach for automatically verifying data structures, focusing on techniques for automatically proving formulas that arise in such verification. I have implemented this approach with my ...

Kuncak, Viktor (Viktor Jaroslav), 1977-

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

228

Automated deduction for verification  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Automated deduction uses computation to perform symbolic logical reasoning. It has been a core technology for program verification from the very beginning. Satisfiability solvers for propositional and first-order logic significantly automate the task ...

Natarajan Shankar

2009-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

229

DOE Strategic Petroleum Reserve Contractor Receives the Baldrige Award |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Strategic Petroleum Reserve Contractor Receives the Baldrige DOE Strategic Petroleum Reserve Contractor Receives the Baldrige Award DOE Strategic Petroleum Reserve Contractor Receives the Baldrige Award April 19, 2006 - 10:21am Addthis Vice President Cheney Presents DOE contractor with the nation's highest Presidential honor for performance excellence and quality achievement WASHINGTON, DC - Vice President Richard Cheney today presented DynMcDermott Petroleum Operations Company, operator of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), with the 2005 Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. The Baldrige award is the nation's highest Presidential honor for performance excellence and quality achievement and is presented annually to organizations that distinguish themselves through management excellence and continuous improvement to stakeholders.

230

Savannah River Site Contractor Receives Project Management Institute Award  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor Receives Project Management Contractor Receives Project Management Institute Award Savannah River Site Contractor Receives Project Management Institute Award November 15, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis SRR Bubbler Project Manager Bill Pepper, center, accepts the PMI Project of the Year award from Eloy Saldivar, left, president of the Savannah River Chapter of PMI. DWPF Facility Manager Les Sonnenberg is on the right. SRR Bubbler Project Manager Bill Pepper, center, accepts the PMI Project of the Year award from Eloy Saldivar, left, president of the Savannah River Chapter of PMI. DWPF Facility Manager Les Sonnenberg is on the right. AIKEN, S.C. - The local chapter of the Project Management Institute (PMI) recently honored the Savannah River Site liquid waste contractor with its 2011 Project of the Year award.

231

Non-Facility Contractor Prior Performance, IG-0857  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Non-Facility Contractor Prior Non-Facility Contractor Prior Performance DOE/IG-0857 October 2011 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 October 28, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Non-Facility Contractor Prior Performance" INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The Department of Energy obligated approximately $89 billion during Fiscal Years 2009 and 2010, through various contracts and financial assistance awards, including contracts funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Holding contractors accountable for past performance is an important tool for making sure that the Federal government and the taxpayers that it represents, receive good value from its contracts. To determine whether a prospective

232

FY 2007/2008 Contractor Performance Plan, Volume 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Contractor Performance Plan is a detailed execution plan covering fiscal years 2007 and 2008 that implements the Integration Project Baseline in a more aggressive cost and schedule approach.

Project Integration

2006-10-03T23:59:59.000Z

233

PARS II New Contractor Information for Interconnection Security...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the tables below and return this form to the PARS II Support Team at DL-CF-40PARS2Support@hq.doe.gov. Contractor Point of Contact Information Name Position CompanyOrganization...

234

Contractor Issues 2011 Annual Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor Issues 2011 Annual Review Contractor Issues 2011 Annual Review Contractor Issues 2011 Annual Review March 1, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis SRR has released its 2011 Annual Review. SRR has released its 2011 Annual Review. AIKEN, S.C. - Savannah River Remediation (SRR), the liquid waste contractor at the Savannah River Site (SRS), has released its 2011 Annual Review available here. The document summarizes the activities and accomplishments of the safe and efficient liquid waste operations at SRS for the 2011 calendar year, which SRR President and Project Manager Dave Olson calls a year of excellence. "Our employees continue the legacy of safe leadership in processing high-level waste with an eye toward operationally closing waste tanks," Olson said. "We have made great strides in many areas."

235

Savannah River Site Contractor Receives Project Management Institute Award  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Savannah River Site Contractor Receives Project Management Savannah River Site Contractor Receives Project Management Institute Award Savannah River Site Contractor Receives Project Management Institute Award November 15, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis SRR Bubbler Project Manager Bill Pepper, center, accepts the PMI Project of the Year award from Eloy Saldivar, left, president of the Savannah River Chapter of PMI. DWPF Facility Manager Les Sonnenberg is on the right. SRR Bubbler Project Manager Bill Pepper, center, accepts the PMI Project of the Year award from Eloy Saldivar, left, president of the Savannah River Chapter of PMI. DWPF Facility Manager Les Sonnenberg is on the right. AIKEN, S.C. - The local chapter of the Project Management Institute (PMI) recently honored the Savannah River Site liquid waste contractor with its

236

DOE Strategic Petroleum Reserve Contractor Receives the Baldrige Award |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Strategic Petroleum Reserve Contractor Receives the Baldrige Strategic Petroleum Reserve Contractor Receives the Baldrige Award DOE Strategic Petroleum Reserve Contractor Receives the Baldrige Award April 19, 2006 - 10:21am Addthis Vice President Cheney Presents DOE contractor with the nation's highest Presidential honor for performance excellence and quality achievement WASHINGTON, DC - Vice President Richard Cheney today presented DynMcDermott Petroleum Operations Company, operator of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), with the 2005 Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. The Baldrige award is the nation's highest Presidential honor for performance excellence and quality achievement and is presented annually to organizations that distinguish themselves through management excellence and continuous improvement to stakeholders.

237

Department of Energy Contractor Diana Lewis Heading to National Small  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Contractor Diana Lewis Heading to National Department of Energy Contractor Diana Lewis Heading to National Small Business Week Department of Energy Contractor Diana Lewis Heading to National Small Business Week June 10, 2013 - 8:50am Addthis Department of Energy Contractor Diana Lewis Heading to National Small Business Week John Hale III John Hale III Director, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization National Small Business Week is around the corner, kicking off on June 17 across the country. The week honors hundreds of thousands of small business that contract with the federal government every year. Diana Lewis, a West Virginia native and founder of Action Facilities Management, Inc., is one of the small business owners being recognized by her state as the Small Business Person of the Year. During National Small

238

Contractor Issues 2011 Annual Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor Issues 2011 Annual Review Contractor Issues 2011 Annual Review Contractor Issues 2011 Annual Review March 1, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis SRR has released its 2011 Annual Review. SRR has released its 2011 Annual Review. AIKEN, S.C. - Savannah River Remediation (SRR), the liquid waste contractor at the Savannah River Site (SRS), has released its 2011 Annual Review available here. The document summarizes the activities and accomplishments of the safe and efficient liquid waste operations at SRS for the 2011 calendar year, which SRR President and Project Manager Dave Olson calls a year of excellence. "Our employees continue the legacy of safe leadership in processing high-level waste with an eye toward operationally closing waste tanks," Olson said. "We have made great strides in many areas."

239

Savannah River Site Contractor Achieves Tank Waste Milestone | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor Achieves Tank Waste Milestone Contractor Achieves Tank Waste Milestone Savannah River Site Contractor Achieves Tank Waste Milestone February 2, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Pictured here is a component of the Interim Salt Disposition Process — known as Modular Caustic Side Solvent Extraction Unit (MCU) — that helped Savannah River Remediation process more than 500,000 gallons of salt waste since October last year, a contract milestone. Pictured here is a component of the Interim Salt Disposition Process - known as Modular Caustic Side Solvent Extraction Unit (MCU) - that helped Savannah River Remediation process more than 500,000 gallons of salt waste since October last year, a contract milestone. AIKEN, S.C. - The Savannah River Site's liquid waste contractor recently achieved a contract milestone by processing 500,000 gallons of

240

Worker Protection Management for DOE Federal and Contractor Employees |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Services » Program Management » Safety » Worker Protection Services » Program Management » Safety » Worker Protection Management for DOE Federal and Contractor Employees Worker Protection Management for DOE Federal and Contractor Employees This Order establishes the framework for an effective worker protection program that will reduce or prevent injuries, illnesses and accidental losses by providing DOE Federal and contractor workers with a safe and healthful workplace. Worker Protection Management for DOE Federal and Contractor Employees More Documents & Publications CRAD, Machine Shop Safe Operations Assessment Plan Order Module--DOE O 440.1B, WORKER PROTECTION PROGRAM FOR DOE (INCLUDING NNSA) FEDERAL EMPLOYEES Audit Report: IG-0404 Waste Management Nuclear Materials & Waste Tank Waste and Waste Processing

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent verification contractor" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Salt Waste Contractor Reaches Contract Milestone | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Salt Waste Contractor Reaches Contract Milestone Salt Waste Contractor Reaches Contract Milestone Salt Waste Contractor Reaches Contract Milestone April 29, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Robert Brown, SRR tank farm operator, performs daily inspections of a salt disposition process facility. The inspections and improvement upgrades have resulted in continued successful operations. Robert Brown, SRR tank farm operator, performs daily inspections of a salt disposition process facility. The inspections and improvement upgrades have resulted in continued successful operations. AIKEN, S.C. - The liquid waste cleanup contractor for the EM program at the Savannah River Site (SRS) recently surpassed a 2013 contract milestone by processing more than 600,000 gallons of salt waste. Savannah River Remediation (SRR) salt disposition process facilities

242

DOE Issues Draft Request for Proposals Seeking Contractor to Manage,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Issues Draft Request for Proposals Seeking Contractor to DOE Issues Draft Request for Proposals Seeking Contractor to Manage, Operate Waste Isolation Pilot Plant DOE Issues Draft Request for Proposals Seeking Contractor to Manage, Operate Waste Isolation Pilot Plant April 1, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Bill Taylor 513-246-0539 william.taylor@emcbc.doe.gov Cincinnati - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued a Draft Request for Proposal (RFP)seeking a management and operations contractor to maintain the Waste Isolation Pilot Plan (WIPP) and manage the DOE National Transuranic Waste (TRU) Program in Carlsbad, New Mexico. The estimated value of the anticipated contract is from $130 to $160 million per year, for five years, with an option to extend the contract for an additional five years. DOE anticipates awarding a competitive, cost-plusaward-fee

243

Magazine Bestows Safety Award on EM Contractor | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Magazine Bestows Safety Award on EM Contractor Magazine Bestows Safety Award on EM Contractor Magazine Bestows Safety Award on EM Contractor October 30, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis RICHLAND, Wash. - A woman-owned small business prime contractor to EM's Office of River Protection has been named one of America's safest companies for 2013 by EHS Today magazine. Advanced Technologies and Laboratories International, Inc. (ATL) is responsible for operating Hanford's 222-S Analytical Laboratory, a 70,000-square-foot facility that handles highly radioactive samples for purposes of organic, inorganic and radio-chemistry analyses. It contains 11 hot cells, which gives the lab the capability to remotely handle highly radioactive samples of tank waste while minimizing radiation dose to workers. ATL was one of 15 companies selected for the award by the magazine, which

244

2005 River Corridor Cleanup Contractor Revegetation Monitoring Report  

SciTech Connect

This report contains a compilation of the results of vegetation monitoring data that were collected in the spring and summer of 2005 for the Environmental Restoration Contractor's revegetation and mitigation areas on the Hanford Site.

A. L. Johnson

2005-09-12T23:59:59.000Z

245

CONTRACTOR REPORT SAND96-2555 UC-1243 Unlimited Release  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

CONTRACTOR REPORT SAND96-2555 UC-1243 Unlimited Release A Study of Productionlnjection Data from Slim Holes and Large-Diameter Wells at the Takigami Geothermal Field, Kyushu,...

246

Contractor-specific Documentation & Information in PARS II  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

DOE Office of Acquisition and Project Management established guidelines for documentation that should be available within PARS II through contractor-specific records that are not linked to any...

247

DOE Chooses Contractor to Disposition Waste at the Advanced Mixed...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, 83403 DOE Chooses Contractor to Disposition Waste at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) CH2M Hill Newport News...

248

PART 708 -- DOE CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEE PROTECTION PROGRAM | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for refusal to participate in dangerous activities. 708.2 What are the definitions of terms used in this regulation? For purposes of this regulation: Contractor means a seller of...

249

GC Opinion on Contractor Participation in the Federal Hiring...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

GCOpinionContractorParticipationintheFederalHiringProcess.pdf More Documents & Publications Audit Special Inquiry: OAS-SR-10-04 Inspections Manual Inspection Report: INS-L-13-06...

250

FY 2007/2008 Contractor Performance Plan, Volume 1  

SciTech Connect

This Contractor Performance Plan is a detailed execution plan covering fiscal years 2007 and 2008 that implements the Integration Project Baseline in a more aggressive cost and schedule approach.

Project Integration

2006-10-03T23:59:59.000Z

251

CONTRACTOR AND ADDRESS COEPPRACT FOR: TERM: COMMT.SSION OBLIGATION  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

CONTRACTOR AND ADDRESS COEPPRACT FOR: TERM: COMMT.SSION OBLIGATION PAYMENT TO m MADE BY: CONTRACT NO. AT(30-l)-1247 CONTRACT pl AMERICAN MACHINE Ah'D FOUNDRY COMP'N' Second Avenue...

252

SECTION J, APPENDIX Q - MIN STDS FOR CONTRACTORS' COI PLANS  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Officers and the Agency when evaluating whether or not a Contractor has a COI. B. Search and Identification of COI The COI Plan shall include a requirement describing when a...

253

Arbitration Guidance for M&O Contractors  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

General Counsel Issues Arbitration Guidance for M&O Contractors General Counsel Issues Arbitration Guidance for M&O Contractors (February 3, 2010) Washington, DC - The Office of the General Counsel, in conjunction with the Office of General Counsel of the NNSA, has reviewed the question of whether Department of Energy contractors can include binding arbitration in their contracts with third-parties. We have determined that there is currently no legal prohibition on M&O contractors including binding arbitration clauses in their contracts with others. In fact, we believe it often will be a good idea to include arbitration clauses as a means of limiting the risk of litigation which is often more time consuming and expensive than arbitration. The Department of Energy, including NNSA, does however "regulate" the use of arbitration once a

254

Monitoring, verification, and accounting  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

verification, and accounting (MVA) activities are underway verification, and accounting (MVA) activities are underway to ensure the injected CO 2 remains in the geologic formation. The first plant has been capturing CO 2 since December 2012, while the second plant completed construction in February and began carbon capture operations in March. Both units are now operating at full capacity. More than 222,000 tons of CO 2 have been captured and provided for storage

255

2011 River Corridor Closure Contractor Revegetation and Mitigation Monitoring Report  

SciTech Connect

This report documents the status of revegetation projects and natural resources mitigation efforts conducted for remediated waste sites and other activities associated with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 cleanup of National Priorities List waste sites at Hanford. This report contains the vegetation monitoring data that was collected in the spring and summer of 2011 from the River Corridor Closure Contractor’s revegetation and mitigation areas on the Hanford Site.

West, W. J.; Lucas, J. G.; Gano, K. A.

2011-11-14T23:59:59.000Z

256

Human Resources Staffing Plan for the Tank Farm Contractor  

SciTech Connect

The Human Resources Staffing Plan quantified the equivalent staffing needs required for the Tank Farm Contractor (TFC) and its subcontractors to execute the readiness to proceed baseline between FY 2000-2008. The TFC staffing needs were assessed along with the staffings needs of Fluor Hanford and the privatization contractor. The plan then addressed the staffing needs and recruitment strategies required to execute the baseline.

BOSLEY, J.W.

2000-04-22T23:59:59.000Z

257

STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW) TEMPLATE COMBINED EIR/ICE SUPPORT CONTRACTOR  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

COMBINED EIRICE SUPPORT CONTRACTOR The template presented below is a Statement of Work (SOW) for services of an EIRICE Support Contractor for assisting OECM in conducting a...

258

Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management - February 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management - February 2012 February 2012 Review of the Implementation Verification Review Processes at the Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management for Building 3019 This report documents the independent review of implementation verification review (IVR) processes at the Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management (ORO-EM) conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review involved evaluation of established IVR processes and implementation of the newly revised documented safety analysis (DSA) and technical safety

259

International Comparison of Product Certification and Verification...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

International Comparison of Product Certification and Verification Methods for Appliances Title International Comparison of Product Certification and Verification Methods for...

260

Quantum Money with Classical Verification  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We construct a quantum money scheme that allows verification through classical communication with bank. This is the first demonstration that a secure quantum money scheme exists that does not require quantum communication for coin verification.

Gavinsky, Dmitry

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent verification contractor" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Verification and validation benchmarks.  

SciTech Connect

Verification and validation (V&V) are the primary means to assess the accuracy and reliability of computational simulations. V&V methods and procedures have fundamentally improved the credibility of simulations in several high-consequence fields, such as nuclear reactor safety, underground nuclear waste storage, and nuclear weapon safety. Although the terminology is not uniform across engineering disciplines, code verification deals with assessing the reliability of the software coding, and solution verification deals with assessing the numerical accuracy of the solution to a computational model. Validation addresses the physics modeling accuracy of a computational simulation by comparing the computational results with experimental data. Code verification benchmarks and validation benchmarks have been constructed for a number of years in every field of computational simulation. However, no comprehensive guidelines have been proposed for the construction and use of V&V benchmarks. For example, the field of nuclear reactor safety has not focused on code verification benchmarks, but it has placed great emphasis on developing validation benchmarks. Many of these validation benchmarks are closely related to the operations of actual reactors at near-safety-critical conditions, as opposed to being more fundamental-physics benchmarks. This paper presents recommendations for the effective design and use of code verification benchmarks based on manufactured solutions, classical analytical solutions, and highly accurate numerical solutions. In addition, this paper presents recommendations for the design and use of validation benchmarks, highlighting the careful design of building-block experiments, the estimation of experimental measurement uncertainty for both inputs and outputs to the code, validation metrics, and the role of model calibration in validation. It is argued that the understanding of predictive capability of a computational model is built on the level of achievement in V&V activities, how closely related the V&V benchmarks are to the actual application of interest, and the quantification of uncertainties related to the application of interest.

Oberkampf, William Louis; Trucano, Timothy Guy

2007-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

262

Specification for HEPA Filters Used By DOE Contractors  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-STD-3020-2005 DOE-STD-3020-2005 December 2005 Supersedes DOE-STD-3020-97 January 1997 DOE TECHNICAL STANDARD Specification for HEPA Filters Used by DOE Contractors U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited FOREWARD This U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) standard supersedes DOE-STD-3020-97 and is approved for use by DOE and its contractors. This standard was developed primarily for application in DOE programs. It provides guidance to DOE contractors for procurement and required testing of High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filters used in DOE nuclear facilities. Required testing is performed by the filter manufacturer and

263

Strategic Petroleum Reserve Contractor to Receive 2005 Malcolm Baldrige  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Strategic Petroleum Reserve Contractor to Receive 2005 Malcolm Strategic Petroleum Reserve Contractor to Receive 2005 Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Strategic Petroleum Reserve Contractor to Receive 2005 Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award November 22, 2005 - 2:51pm Addthis Recognition for Management Performance Excellence and Continuous Improvement to Stakeholders WASHINGTON, DC - Secretary of Energy Samuel Bodman today announced that DynMcDermott Petroleum Operations Company, operator of the nation's Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), has been honored with the 2005 Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award, the nation's highest Presidential honor for quality and organizational performance excellence. President George W. Bush and Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez revealed DynMcDermott's award earlier today, along with five other honorees.

264

Staff and Contractors Blog Archive | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Staff and Contractors Staff and Contractors Blog Archive Staff and Contractors Blog Archive RSS April 3, 2013 Save the date for the Asian Pacific American Heritage Month Family Day at the Smithsonian! This year it will be at the National Museum of American History on Saturday, May 4, 2013. More details to come. 2013 Asian American & Pacific Islander Heritage Month Resources and Theme Editor's Note: This information is provided by the White House Initiative on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders. February 19, 2013 Director Dot Harris presents Chris Smith, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary and Acting Assistant Secretary of Fossil Energy, with a professional achievement award at the Black Engineer of the Year Awards conference this February. Photo Credit: Nancy Jo Brown/106FOTO

265

Recovery Act Funds Expand Groundwater Treatment at Hanford Site: Contractor  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Funds Expand Groundwater Treatment at Hanford Site: Funds Expand Groundwater Treatment at Hanford Site: Contractor CH2M HILL drills record number of wells Recovery Act Funds Expand Groundwater Treatment at Hanford Site: Contractor CH2M HILL drills record number of wells May 26, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Andre Armstrong CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (509) 376-6773 Andre_L_Armstrong@rl.gov Geoff Tyree, DOE (509) 376-4171 Geoffrey.Tyree@rl.doe.gov RICHLAND, Wash. - Workers at the Hanford Site have surpassed goals for drilling wells to detect and remove contamination from groundwater. The groundwater was contaminated by radioactive waste and chemicals generated during decades of producing plutonium for the Cold War at the Hanford Site in southeast Washington State. The Department of Energy (DOE) had set a goal for its contractor, CH2M HILL

266

DOE Selects Contractor for Depleted Hexafluoride Conversion Project Support  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Selects Contractor for Depleted Hexafluoride Conversion Project DOE Selects Contractor for Depleted Hexafluoride Conversion Project Support DOE Selects Contractor for Depleted Hexafluoride Conversion Project Support March 25, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Bill Taylor, 803-952-8564 Bill.Taylor@srs.gov Cincinnati - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today awarded a competitive small business task order to Navarro Research and Engineering Inc. of Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The award is a $22 million, time and materials task order with a three-year performance period and two one-year extension options. Navarro Research and Engineering Inc. will provide engineering and operations technical support services to the DOE Portsmouth Paducah Project Office (PPPO) in Lexington, Kentucky and the Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride (DUF6) Conversion Project in Paducah, Kentucky and Portsmouth, Ohio.

267

WIPP contractor receives VPP Legacy of Stars Award 2013  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Management and Operating Contractor Management and Operating Contractor Recognized for Continuous Safety Performance CARLSBAD, N.M., September 20, 2013 - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) recognized Nuclear Waste Partnership LLC (NWP), the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) management and operating (M&O) contractor, with the Voluntary Protection Program (VPP) Legacy of Stars Award in latter August 2013. "Safety is central to everything we do, and achieving this elite designation validates our work and the safety-focused culture we strive to create," said Farok Sharif, NWP President and Project Manager, who received the award with Kevin Miller, United Steel Workers Local Bargaining Unit VPP Ombudsman, at the VPP Participants' Association National Conference

268

Specification for HEPA Filters Used By DOE Contractors  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-STD-3020-2005 DOE-STD-3020-2005 December 2005 Supersedes DOE-STD-3020-97 January 1997 DOE TECHNICAL STANDARD Specification for HEPA Filters Used by DOE Contractors U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited FOREWARD This U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) standard supersedes DOE-STD-3020-97 and is approved for use by DOE and its contractors. This standard was developed primarily for application in DOE programs. It provides guidance to DOE contractors for procurement and required testing of High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filters used in DOE nuclear facilities. Required testing is performed by the filter manufacturer and

269

DOE Selects Contractor for Depleted Hexafluoride Conversion Project Support  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor for Depleted Hexafluoride Conversion Project Contractor for Depleted Hexafluoride Conversion Project Support DOE Selects Contractor for Depleted Hexafluoride Conversion Project Support March 25, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Bill Taylor, 803-952-8564 Bill.Taylor@srs.gov Cincinnati - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today awarded a competitive small business task order to Navarro Research and Engineering Inc. of Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The award is a $22 million, time and materials task order with a three-year performance period and two one-year extension options. Navarro Research and Engineering Inc. will provide engineering and operations technical support services to the DOE Portsmouth Paducah Project Office (PPPO) in Lexington, Kentucky and the Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride (DUF6) Conversion Project in Paducah, Kentucky and Portsmouth, Ohio.

270

The Department of Energy's Management of Contractor Responsibility Determinations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Management of Contractor Management of Contractor Responsibility Determinations OAS-M-13-07 September 2013 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 4, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SENIOR PROCUREMENT EXECUTIVES FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND THE NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM: Rickey R. Hass Deputy Inspector General for Audits and Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The Department of Energy's Management of Contractor Responsibility Determinations" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy (Department) is second only to the Department of Defense in contract awards, expending approximately 90 percent of its budget through a variety of contracts and financial assistance agreements. From January 2010 to January 2012, the Department's Office of

271

Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Berkeley National Berkeley National Laboratory - April 2009 Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory - April 2009 April 2009 Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Programs at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), inspected environment, safety, and health (ES&H) programs at the DOE Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) during January through February 2009. The inspection was performed by the Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations. The contractor assurance system has been improved and is identifying deficiencies and improving LBNL ES&H processes and performance. LBNL has

272

DOE directives: Improving contractor review and compliance systems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Department of Energy contractors are regulated by DOE directives. Rigorous and effective contractor administrative systems to review directives and document compliance are essential. WINCO recognized the need to improve its directives review system. Three areas have been addressed: Computerized tracking, documentation of the review itself--at the requirement rather then the directive level, and the role of the directives administrator. The result is a system that generates and captures information for use in the company rather than simply creating files and that attest to work accomplished.

Airmet, D.

1990-05-07T23:59:59.000Z

273

Proceedings of the fuels technology contractors review meeting  

SciTech Connect

The Fuels Technology Contractors Review Meeting was held November 16-18, 1993, at the Morgantown Energy Technology Center (METC) in Morgantown, West Virginia. This meeting was sponsored and hosted by METC, the Office of Fossil Energy, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). METC periodically provides an opportunity to bring together all of the R&D participants in a DOE-sponsored contractors review meeting to present key results of their research and to provide technology transfer to the active research community and to the interested public. This meeting was previously called the Natural Gas Technology Contractors Review Meeting. This year it was expanded to include DOE-sponsored research on oil shale and tar sands and so was retitled the Fuels Technology Contractors Review Meeting. Current research activities include efforts in both natural gas and liquid fuels. The natural gas portion of the meeting included discussions of results summarizing work being conducted in fracture systems, both natural and induced; drilling, completion, and stimulation research; resource characterization; delivery and storage; gas to liquids research; and environmental issues. The meeting also included project and technology summaries on research in oil shale, tar sands, and mild coal gasification, and summaries of work in natural-gas fuel cells and natural-gas turbines. The format included oral and poster session presentations. Individual papers have been processed separately for inclusion in the Energy Science and Technology database.

Malone, R.D. [ed.

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

274

DOE Human Genome Program contractor-grantee workshop  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This volume contains the proceedings for the DOE Human Genome Program`s Contractor-Grantee Workshop V held in Sante Fe, New Mexico January 28, February 1, 1996. Presentations were divided into sessions entitled Sequencing; Mapping; Informatics; Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues; and Infrastructure. Reports of individual projects described herein are separately indexed and abstracted for the database.

NONE

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

275

Technical Baseline Summary Description for the Tank Farm Contractor  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document is a revision of the document titled above, summarizing the technical baseline of the Tank Farm Contractor. It is one of several documents prepared by CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc. to support the U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection Tank Waste Retrieval and Disposal Mission at Hanford.

TEDESCHI, A.R.

2000-04-21T23:59:59.000Z

276

Configuration Management Plan for the Tank Farm Contractor  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Configuration Management Plan for the Tank Farm Contractor describes configuration management the contractor uses to manage and integrate its technical baseline with the programmatic and functional operations to perform work. The Configuration Management Plan for the Tank Farm Contractor supports the management of the project baseline by providing the mechanisms to identify, document, and control the technical characteristics of the products, processes, and structures, systems, and components (SSC). This plan is one of the tools used to identify and provide controls for the technical baseline of the Tank Farm Contractor (TFC). The configuration management plan is listed in the management process documents for TFC as depicted in Attachment 1, TFC Document Structure. The configuration management plan is an integrated approach for control of technical, schedule, cost, and administrative processes necessary to manage the mission of the TFC. Configuration management encompasses the five functional elements of: (1) configuration management administration, (2) configuration identification, (3) configuration status accounting, (4) change control, and (5 ) configuration management assessments.

WEIR, W.R.

2000-04-21T23:59:59.000Z

277

SAPHIRE 8 Software Independent Verification and Validation Plan  

SciTech Connect

SAPHIRE 8 is being developed with a phased or cyclic iterative rapid application development methodology. Due to this approach, a similar approach is being taken for the IV&V activities on each vital software object. The IV&V plan is structured around NUREG/BR-0167, “Software Quality Assurance Program and Guidelines,” February 1993. The Nuclear Regulatory Research Office Instruction No.: PRM-12, “Software Quality Assurance for RES Sponsored Codes,” March 26, 2007 specifies that RES-sponsored software is to be evaluated against NUREG/BR-0167. Per the guidance in NUREG/BR-0167, SAPHIRE is classified as “Level 1.” Level 1 software corresponds to technical application software used in a safety decision.

Rae J. Nims

2009-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

278

SAPHIRE 8 Software Independent Verification and Validation Plan  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

SAPHIRE 8 is being developed with a phased or cyclic iterative rapid application development methodology. Due to this approach, a similar approach is being taken for the IV&V activities on each vital software object. The IV&V plan is structured around NUREG/BR-0167, “Software Quality Assurance Program and Guidelines,” February 1993. The Nuclear Regulatory Research Office Instruction No.: PRM-12, “Software Quality Assurance for RES Sponsored Codes,” March 26, 2007 specifies that RES-sponsored software is to be evaluated against NUREG/BR-0167. Per the guidance in NUREG/BR-0167, SAPHIRE is classified as “Level 1.” Level 1 software corresponds to technical application software used in a safety decision.

Rae J. Nims; Kent M. Norris

2010-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

279

TFE Verification Program  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The objective of the semiannual progress report is to summarize the technical results obtained during the latest reporting period. The information presented herein will include evaluated test data, design evaluations, the results of analyses and the significance of results. The program objective is to demonstrate the technology readiness of a TFE suitable for use as the basic element in a thermionic reactor with electric power output in the 0.5 to 5.0 MW(e) range, and a full-power life of 7 years. The TF Verification Program builds directly on the technology and data base developed in the 1960s and 1970s in an AEC/NASA program, and in the SP-100 program conducted in 1983, 1984 and 1985. In the SP-100 program, the attractive but concern was expressed over the lack of fast reactor irradiation data. The TFE Verification Program addresses this concern. The general logic and strategy of the program to achieve its objectives is shown on Fig. 1-1. Five prior programs form the basis for the TFE Verification Program: (1) AEC/NASA program of the 1960s and early 1970; (2) SP-100 concept development program;(3) SP-100 thermionic technology program; (4) Thermionic irradiations program in TRIGA in FY-86; (5) and Thermionic Technology Program in 1986 and 1987. 18 refs., 64 figs., 43 tabs.

Not Available

1990-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

280

Quantum Money with Classical Verification  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We propose and construct a quantum money scheme that allows verification through classical communication with a bank. This is the first demonstration that a secure quantum money scheme exists that does not require quantum communication for coin verification. Our scheme is secure against adaptive adversaries - this property is not directly related to the possibility of classical verification, nevertheless none of the earlier quantum money constructions is known to possess it.

Dmitry Gavinsky

2011-09-02T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent verification contractor" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Independent Oversight Special Review, Headquarters - August 2008 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Special Review, Headquarters - August 2008 Independent Oversight Special Review, Headquarters - August 2008 Independent Oversight Special Review, Headquarters - August 2008 August 2008 Review of Construction Safety and Health Programs This special review of construction safety was performed by the Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), to provide feedback to DOE line management and contractors on the effectiveness of line organizations at DOE sites in implementing construction safety requirements. This special review is based on data collected over the past three years (covering the timeframe from late 2005 to early 2008) during scheduled inspections performed by Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations, at the

282

Self-Assessment Standard for DOE Contractor Criticality Safety Programs  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10 10 March 2010 DOE STANDARD SELF-ASSESSMENT STANDARD FOR DOE CONTRACTOR CRITICALITY SAFETY PROGRAMS DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Page at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ DOE-STD-1158-2010 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ................................................................................................................... v ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ..................................................................................................vi DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................ vii

283

Insulating gathering lines; Contractor overcomes obstacles on California oil pipelines  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Isotherm Co. Inc., installed more than 1 million linear ft of fiberglass pipe insulation on 2- and 3-in. crude oil gathering lines at the Belridge oil field in Kern County, Calif. The project, which involved insulating 200 miles of pipeline, was completed in 7 months. In addition to the size of the project and time constraints, the contractor was faced with several other challenges, including scheduling. The way in which these challenges were met are described in this paper.

Not Available

1988-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

284

House Tightening Manual for Homeowners and Weatherization Contractors.  

SciTech Connect

The Bonneville Power Administration has sponsored preparation of this house tightening manual for use by weatherization contractors, homeowners, and others. It is a guide to location and repair of major residential air infiltration sources, based on the experience of professional ''house doctors,'' using trained visual inspection techniques. This manual describes how to locate and repair the kinds of leaks that were encountered in the 40 test homes, without test equipment.

Levi, Daniel; Boe, A.B.

1985-10-31T23:59:59.000Z

285

Independent Oversight Inspection, Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant - November 2006 Independent Oversight Inspection, Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant - November 2006 November 2006 Inspection of Emergency Management at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant The Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Security and Safety Performance Assurance, conducted an inspection of the emergency management program at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PORTS) in August and September 2006. The coordination of emergency plans and procedures among USEC and DOE contractor organizations has successfully integrated the emergency management programs into a single cohesive program for the PORTS site. Other strengths include accurate hazards surveys that identify applicable

286

Idaho Governor Praises DOE, Contractor Effort for Resuming Critical Cleanup  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Governor Praises DOE, Contractor Effort for Resuming Critical Governor Praises DOE, Contractor Effort for Resuming Critical Cleanup Project Idaho Governor Praises DOE, Contractor Effort for Resuming Critical Cleanup Project July 30, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Idaho Governor C.L. “Butch” Otter discusses the importance of completing the cleanup mission at the Idaho site. Idaho Governor C.L. "Butch" Otter discusses the importance of completing the cleanup mission at the Idaho site. An exterior view of the recently constructed Accelerated Retrieval Project-VIII facility. An exterior view of the recently constructed Accelerated Retrieval Project-VIII facility. The Accelerated Retrieval Project-VIII building spans a 1.72-acre footprint. More than 2 million pounds of structural steel went into building. The eastern and largest portion of the structure is 250 feet long by 290 feet wide and 70 feet tall. The one-of-a-kind design consists of a center column-supported space frame connecting each side of the facility’s roof trusses.

287

Idaho Governor Praises DOE, Contractor Effort for Resuming Critical Cleanup  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Idaho Governor Praises DOE, Contractor Effort for Resuming Critical Idaho Governor Praises DOE, Contractor Effort for Resuming Critical Cleanup Project Idaho Governor Praises DOE, Contractor Effort for Resuming Critical Cleanup Project July 30, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Idaho Governor C.L. “Butch” Otter discusses the importance of completing the cleanup mission at the Idaho site. Idaho Governor C.L. "Butch" Otter discusses the importance of completing the cleanup mission at the Idaho site. An exterior view of the recently constructed Accelerated Retrieval Project-VIII facility. An exterior view of the recently constructed Accelerated Retrieval Project-VIII facility. The Accelerated Retrieval Project-VIII building spans a 1.72-acre footprint. More than 2 million pounds of structural steel went into building. The eastern and largest portion of the structure is 250 feet long by 290 feet wide and 70 feet tall. The one-of-a-kind design consists of a center column-supported space frame connecting each side of the facility’s roof trusses.

288

Contractor Post-Retirement HealthBenefits at the Oak Ridge Reservation...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Other Agencies You are here Home Contractor Post-Retirement HealthBenefits at the Oak Ridge Reservation, IG-0690 Contractor Post-Retirement HealthBenefits at the Oak Ridge...

289

Independent Oversight, Nevada National Security Site - March 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight, Nevada National Security Site - March 2012 Independent Oversight, Nevada National Security Site - March 2012 Independent Oversight, Nevada National Security Site - March 2012 March 2012 Review of the Nevada National Security Site Implementation Verification Review Processes This report documents the independent review of implementation verification review (IVR) processes at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), which is within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations from February 6 to 15, 2012. Independent Oversight, Nevada National Security Site - March 2012 More Documents & Publications Independent Oversight Review, Y-12 National Security Complex - June 2012

290

Automatic Verification of String Manipulating ProgramsOverview Outline Overview Symbolic String Verification Composite Verification References  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Is it Vulnerable? We investigate string verification problem and present an automata-based approach for automatic verification of string manipulating programs based on symbolic string analysis. String analysis plays an important role in the security area. For instance, one can detect various web vulnerabilities like SQL Command Injection and Cross Site Scripting (XSS) attacks. Fang Yu, UCSB Automatic Verification of String Manipulating ProgramsOutline

Fang Yu; Cs Guest Leture

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

291

Review of the Implementation Verification Rev iew Processes at the Savannah River Site Environmental Management Nuclear Facilities, September 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Implementation Verification Review Implementation Verification Review Processes at the Savannah River Site Environmental Management Nuclear Facilities May 2011 September 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Independent Oversight Review of the Implementation Verification Review Processes at the Savannah River Site Environmental Management Nuclear Facilities Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1

292

Review of the Implementation Verification Rev iew Processes at the Savannah River Site Environmental Management Nuclear Facilities, September 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Implementation Verification Review Implementation Verification Review Processes at the Savannah River Site Environmental Management Nuclear Facilities May 2011 September 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Independent Oversight Review of the Implementation Verification Review Processes at the Savannah River Site Environmental Management Nuclear Facilities Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1

293

Webinar - Software Verification & Validation? - 2012-08-04  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Webinar - Software Verification & Validation [1200]. Purpose: Webinar - Software Verification & Validation [1200]. At the ...

2013-06-03T23:59:59.000Z

294

Security and Verification Provable cryptography  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Security and Verification Provable cryptography Benjamin Grégoire1 Tamara Rezk1 1INRIA Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée, France Cours de Master 2 Univerisité de Nice Sophia-Antipolis Security and Verification 1/ 33 #12;Cryptanalysis-driven Security Propose a cryptographic scheme Wait for someone to come

Gregoire, Benjamin - Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique, Centre de recherche Sophia Antipolis

295

ETV Joint Verification Statement  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Verification Program (ETV) to facilitate the deployment of innovative or improved environmental technologies through performance verification and dissemination of information. The goal of the ETV Program is to further environmental protection by substantially accelerating the acceptance and use of improved and cost-effective technologies. ETV seeks to achieve this goal by providing high-quality, peer-reviewed data on technology performance to those involved in the design, distribution, financing, permitting, purchase, and use of environmental technologies. ETV works in partnership with recognized standards and testing organizations and stakeholder groups consisting of regulators, buyers, and vendor organizations, with the full participation of individual technology developers. The program evaluates the performance of innovative technologies by developing test plans that are responsive to the needs of stakeholders, conducting field or laboratory tests (as appropriate), collecting and analyzing data, and preparing peer-reviewed reports. All evaluations are conducted in accordance with rigorous quality assurance protocols to ensure that data of known and adequate quality are generated and that the results are defensible.

unknown authors

1999-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

296

Verification and validation of RADMODL Version 1.0  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

RADMODL is a system of linked computer codes designed to calculate the radiation environment following an accident in which nuclear materials are released. The RADMODL code and the corresponding Verification and Validation (V&V) calculations (Appendix A), were developed for Westinghouse Savannah River Company (WSRC) by EGS Corporation (EGS). Each module of RADMODL is an independent code and was verified separately. The full system was validated by comparing the output of the various modules with the corresponding output of a previously verified version of the modules. The results of the verification and validation tests show that RADMODL correctly calculates the transport of radionuclides and radiation doses. As a result of this verification and validation effort, RADMODL Version 1.0 is certified for use in calculating the radiation environment following an accident.

Kimball, K.D.

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

297

The Integrated Safety Management System Verification Enhancement Review of the Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP)  

SciTech Connect

The primary purpose of the verification enhancement review was for the DOE Richland Operations Office (RL) to verify contractor readiness for the independent DOE Integrated Safety Management System Verification (ISMSV) on the Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP). Secondary objectives included: (1) to reinforce the engagement of management and to gauge management commitment and accountability; (2) to evaluate the ''value added'' benefit of direct public involvement; (3) to evaluate the ''value added'' benefit of direct worker involvement; (4) to evaluate the ''value added'' benefit of the panel-to-panel review approach; and, (5) to evaluate the utility of the review's methodology/adaptability to periodic assessments of ISM status. The review was conducted on December 6-8, 1999, and involved the conduct of two-hour interviews with five separate panels of individuals with various management and operations responsibilities related to PFP. A semi-structured interview process was employed by a team of five ''reviewers'' who directed open-ended questions to the panels which focused on: (1) evidence of management commitment, accountability, and involvement; and, (2) consideration and demonstration of stakeholder (including worker) information and involvement opportunities. The purpose of a panel-to-panel dialogue approach was to better spotlight: (1) areas of mutual reinforcement and alignment that could serve as good examples of the management commitment and accountability aspects of ISMS implementation, and, (2) areas of potential discrepancy that could provide opportunities for improvement. In summary, the Review Team found major strengths to include: (1) the use of multi-disciplinary project work teams to plan and do work; (2) the availability and broad usage of multiple tools to help with planning and integrating work; (3) senior management presence and accessibility; (4) the institutionalization of worker involvement; (5) encouragement of self-reporting and self-assessment by management; (6) the availability of multiple internal communication mechanisms; and, (7) the existence of overall facility-wide safety management goals as well as individualized project work team goals. Major opportunities for improvement identified include: (1) the enhancement of external communications relative to ISM; (2) the institutionalization of ISM-related performance agreements/incentives; (3) the strengthening of feedback loops; (4) fine-tuning the use of tools; and, (5) the formalization of good practices.

BRIGGS, C.R.

2000-02-09T23:59:59.000Z

298

Summary Audit Report on Contractor Employee Relocation and Temporary Living Costs, IG-0400  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DATE: January 27, 1997 DATE: January 27, 1997 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-1 SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Summary Audit Report on Contractor Employee Relocation andTemporary Living Costs TO: The Acting Secretary This summary report highlights systemic problems with contractor charges for contractor employee relocation and temporary living costs. Over the past 5 years, the Office of Inspector General issued nine audit reports that identified unreasonable and unallowable charges for employee relocation and temporary living costs by contractors and their subcontractors. We found that contractors were reimbursed for these costs because the Department of Energy (Department) did not use clearly defined contract provisions

299

UMTRA technical assistance contractor quality assurance program plan  

SciTech Connect

This Quality Assurance Program Plan (QAPP) provides the primary requirements for the integration of quality functions into all Technical Assistance Contractor (TAC) Project organization activities. The QAPP is the written directive authorized by the TAc Program Manager to accomplish this task and to implement procedures that provide the controls and sound management practices needed to ensure TAC contractual obligations are met. The QA program is designed to use monitoring, audit, and surveillance functions as management tools to ensure that all Project organization functions are executed in a manner that will protect public health and safety, promote the success of the Project, and meet or exceed contract requirements.

Not Available

1994-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

300

10 C.F.R. 708: DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program | Department of  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

708: DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program 708: DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program 10 C.F.R. 708: DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program Stakeholders: Employee(s) of DOE contractor(s) Scope: 10 C.F.R. 708 establishes criteria and procedures for the investigation, hearing, and review of allegations from DOE contractor employees of employer reprisal resulting from employee disclosure of information to DOE, to members of Congress, or to the contractor; employee participation in proceedings before Congress or pursuant to this subpart; or employee refusal to engage in illegal or dangerous activities, when such disclosure, participation, or refusal pertains to employer practices which the employee believes to be unsafe; to violate laws, rules, or regulations; or to involve fraud, mismanagement, waste, or abuse.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent verification contractor" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Diverse Array of Career Resources Help EM Contractor Employees Find New  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Diverse Array of Career Resources Help EM Contractor Employees Find Diverse Array of Career Resources Help EM Contractor Employees Find New Work Diverse Array of Career Resources Help EM Contractor Employees Find New Work More than 1,640 former Office of Environmental Management (EM) contractor employees have received career and outplacement assistance through a program launched by EM early last year. Under a contract with EM, Professional Services of America, Inc. (PSA) operates the Contractor Transition Service Program. Its services are available to contractor employees across the EM complex, including those who worked in the $6 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Program, which largely came to a close in September 2011. Diverse Array of Career Resources Help EM Contractor Employees Find New Work More Documents & Publications

302

Report on audit of Department of Energy`s contractor salary increase fund  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (Department) uses contractors to operate its facilities and compensates contractor employees based on their skills, complexity of jobs, and work performance. Thirty-one of the Department`s major contractors reported a total payroll of $4.3 billion and $4.4 billion during 1994 and 1995, respectively. The 31 contractors also reported awarding salary increases of $18 million for 1994 and $200 million for 1995. The purpose of the audit was to review the process used to determine and approve the amount of salary increases for contractor employees. The specific audit objective was to determine whether salary increases received by contractor employees were in accordance with Departmental policies and procedures. The Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) requires that contractor salary actions be within specific limitations, supportable, and approved prior to incurrence of costs. In addition, the Secretary of Energy imposed a 1 year salary freeze on the merit portion of management and operating contractor employee salaries for each contractor`s Fiscal Year 1994 compensation year. However, a fund for promotions and adjustments was approved but limited to 0.5 percent of payroll for the year. A review of eight major contractors showed that six complied with the Department`s policies on salary increases. The other two gave salary increases that were not always in accordance with Departmental policies. This resulted in both contractors not fully complying with the pay freeze in 1994 and exceeding their salary increase fund budgets in 1995. If these two contractors had implemented Department and contract requirements and contracting officers had properly performed their contract administrative responsibilities concerning salary increase funds, both contractors would have frozen salary increases and would not have exceeded their annual budgets.

NONE

1997-04-04T23:59:59.000Z

303

Environmental Program Description for the Tank Farm Contractor  

SciTech Connect

This Environmental Program Description has been developed in support of the Integrated Environmental, Safety, and Health Management System and consistent with the goals of DOE/RL-96-50, Hanford Strategic Plan. This Environmental Program Plan was developed in support of the Integrated Environment, Safety, and Health Management System Description for the Tank Farm Contractor (ISMS) (RPP-MP-003), which establishes a single, defined environmental, safety, and health management system that integrates requirements into the work planning and execution processes to protect workers, the public, and the environment. The ISMS also provides mechanisms for increasing worker involvement in work planning, including hazard and environmental impact identification, analysis, and control; work execution; and feedback/improvement processes. The ISMS plan consists of five core functions. Each section of this plan describes the activities (formerly known as the Tank Waste Remediation System) of the Tank Farm Contractor (TFC) environmental organization according to the following core functions: Establish Environmental Policy and Define Work Scope; Identify Hazards, Environmental Impacts, and Requirements; Analyze Hazards and Environmental Impacts and Implement Controls; Provide Feedback and Continuous Improvement; and Perform Work within Controls.

POWELL, P.A.

2000-04-20T23:59:59.000Z

304

Letter Report - Verification Survey of Final Grids at the David Witherspoon, Inc. 1630 Site Knoxville, Tennessee  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Conduct verification surveys of grids at the DWI 1630 Site in Knoxville, Tennessee. The independent verification team (IVT) from ORISE, conducted verification activities in whole and partial grids, as completed by BJC. ORISE site activities included gamma surface scans and soil sampling within 33 grids; G11 through G14; H11 through H15; X14, X15, X19, and X21; J13 through J15 and J17 through J21; K7 through K9 and K13 through K15; L13 through L15; and M14 through M16

P.C. Weaver

2009-02-17T23:59:59.000Z

305

Scoring Rules for Forecast Verification  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The problem of probabilistic forecast verification is approached from a theoretical point of view starting from three basic desiderata: additivity, exclusive dependence on physical observations (“locality”), and strictly proper behavior. By ...

Riccardo Benedetti

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

306

Wavelets and Field Forecast Verification  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Current field forecast verification measures are inadequate, primarily because they compress the comparison between two complex spatial field processes into one number. Discrete wavelet transforms (DWTs) applied to analysis and contemporaneous ...

William M. Briggs; Richard A. Levine

1997-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

307

Runtime verification: the application perspective  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In the past decade, Runtime Verification (RV) has gained much focus, from both the research community and practitioners. Roughly speaking, RV combines a set of theories, techniques and tools aiming towards efficient analysis of systems' executions and ...

Yliès Falcone; Lenore D. Zuck

2012-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

308

Integrated safety management system verification: Volume 1  

SciTech Connect

Department of Energy (DOE) Policy (P) 450.4, Safety Management System Policy, commits to institutionalizing an Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) throughout the DOE complex. The DOE Acquisition Regulations (DEAR 48 CFR 970) requires contractors to manage and perform work in accordance with a documented Integrated Safety Management System. The Manager, Richland Operations Office (RL), initiated a combined Phase 1 and Phase 2 Integrated Safety Management Verification review to confirm that PNNL had successfully submitted a description of their ISMS and had implemented ISMS within the laboratory facilities and processes. A combined review was directed by the Manager, RL, based upon the progress PNNL had made in the implementation of ISM. This report documents the results of the review conducted to verify: (1) that the PNNL integrated safety management system description and enabling documents and processes conform to the guidance provided by the Manager, RL; (2) that corporate policy is implemented by line managers; (3) that PNNL has provided tailored direction to the facility management; and (4) the Manager, RL, has documented processes that integrate their safety activities and oversight with those of PNNL. The general conduct of the review was consistent with the direction provided by the Under Secretary`s Draft Safety Management System Review and Approval Protocol. The purpose of this review was to provide the Manager, RL, with a recommendation to the adequacy of the ISMS description of the Pacific Northwest Laboratory based upon compliance with the requirements of 49 CFR 970.5204(-2 and -78); and, to provide an evaluation of the extent and maturity of ISMS implementation within the Laboratory. Further, this review was intended to provide a model for other DOE Laboratories. In an effort to reduce the time and travel costs associated with ISM verification the team agreed to conduct preliminary training and orientation electronically and by phone. These activities are normally conducted during a pre-visit trip to the site. The Team recommends approval of the Integrated Safety Management System Description subject to the resolution of the Areas of Concerns noted here.

Christensen, R.F.

1998-08-12T23:59:59.000Z

309

Proceedings: Demand Response Evaluation, Measurement, and Verification Workshop Highlights and Presentations  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Tech Update provides highlights and presentations from the EPRI Demand Response Evaluation, Measurement and Verification (DR EM&V) Workshop, held November 13 14, 2008, in Dallas, Texas. Attended by 30 participants representing utilities, independent system operators, EPRI, and a curtailment service provider, the day-and-a-half meeting provided a forum for review of DR measurement and verification (M&V) standards development, business practices, and lessons learned.

2008-12-22T23:59:59.000Z

310

Independent Oversight Review, Pantex Plant - February 2012 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Plant - February 2012 Plant - February 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Pantex Plant - February 2012 February 2012 Review of the Pantex Plant Implementation Verification Review Processes This report documents the independent review of implementation verification review (IVR) processes at the Pantex Plant conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), which is within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations from January 17 to 24, 2012. The overall purpose of these Independent Oversight reviews is to evaluate the processes and methods used for verifying and re-verifying implementation of new or substantially revised safety basis hazard controls. Independent Oversight Review, Pantex Plant - February 2012

311

Independent Activity Report, New Brunswick Laboratory - July 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 2012 July 2012 Independent Activity Report, New Brunswick Laboratory - July 2012 July 2012 Operational Awareness Oversight of the New Brunswick Laboratory [HIAR NBL-2012-07-20] The purpose of this Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) activity was to independently review the closed corrective actions from the Office of Science, Chicago Office (CH) implementation verification review (IVR) report for the New Brunswick Laboratory (NBL), which addressed vault and vault work room safety basis controls and was completed in April 2012. Independent Activity Report, New Brunswick Laboratory - July 2012 More Documents & Publications Independent Activity Report, Argonne National Laboratory - July 2012 Independent Activity Report, New Brunswick Laboratory - November 2011

312

Independent Oversight Review, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - April 2013 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April April 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - April 2013 April 2013 Review of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Work Planning and Control Activities The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted a shadowing oversight activity to review the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) oversight of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). This Independent Oversight activity was performed by HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations personnel shadowing the CBFO's review of the WIPP operating contractor's Work Control Improvement Plan implementation and effectiveness review, and CBFO's annual review of the contractor's Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS), specifically

313

Independent Confirmatory Survey Summary and Results for the Plum Brook Reactor Facility Sandusky OH  

SciTech Connect

The objectives of the confirmatory survey activities were to provide independent contractor field data reviews and to generate independent radiological data for use by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in evaluating the adequacy and accuracy of the licensee’s procedures and final status survey (FSS) results.

E.N. Bailey

2008-05-06T23:59:59.000Z

314

AHAM DOE Verification Test Agreement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Verification Test Agreement AHAM DOE Verification Test Agreement This letter is to inform AHAM that DOE is adopting a new policy regarding DOE ENERGY STAR verification testing...

315

Code verification by static analysis: a mathematical programming ...  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Code verification by static analysis: a mathematical ... One of the most important verification techniques is static code analysis by abstract ...... verif-instances.zip.

316

DOE-HDBK-3027-99; DOE Handbook Integrated Safety Management Systems (ISMS) Verification Team Leader's Handbook  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

27-99 27-99 June 1999 DOE HANDBOOK INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (ISMS) VERIFICATION TEAM LEADER'S HANDBOOK U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-HDBK-3027-99 iii INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (ISMS) VERIFICATION TEAM LEADER' S HANDBOOK FOREWORD This ISMS Verification Team Leader'

317

AHAM Letter Acknowledging DOE Letter on Verification Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

26, 2013 26, 2013 By E-Mail Ms. Kathleen B. Hogan Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585-0121 Dear Ms. Hogan: I am writing regarding your letter dated April 26, 2013, in which the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or the Department) adopted a new policy regarding DOE ENERGY STAR verification

318

Verification Survey of the Building 315 Zero Power Reactor-6 Facility, Argonne National Laboratory-East, Argonne, Illinois  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) conducted independent verification radiological survey activities at Argonne National Laboratory’s Building 315, Zero Power Reactor-6 facility in Argonne, Illinois. Independent verification survey activities included document and data reviews, alpha plus beta and gamma surface scans, alpha and beta surface activity measurements, and instrumentation comparisons. An interim letter report and a draft report, documenting the verification survey findings, were submitted to the DOE on November 8, 2006 and February 22, 2007, respectively (ORISE 2006b and 2007).

W. C. Adams

2007-05-25T23:59:59.000Z

319

Policy Flash 2013-70 Acqusition Guides 42.15 Contractor Performance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 Acqusition Guides 42.15 Contractor Performance 0 Acqusition Guides 42.15 Contractor Performance Infromation and 42.16 reporting Other Contractor Performance into Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Infromation Systems (FAPIIS) Policy Flash 2013-70 Acqusition Guides 42.15 Contractor Performance Infromation and 42.16 reporting Other Contractor Performance into Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Infromation Systems (FAPIIS) Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Barbara Binney, of the Office of Acquisition and Project Management Policy at (202) 287-1340 or at Barbara.Binney@hq.doe.gov. Flash AG chapter 4215 final.pdf AcqGuide42pt15 August 1 2013.pdf AcqGuide42pt FAPIIS August 1 2013.pdf More Documents & Publications Policy Flash 2013-77 Contractor Performance Information

320

DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate its Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate its Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory July 3, 2008 - 2:15pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today issued its Request for Proposals (RFP) for the competitive selection of a contractor to manage and operate Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), a DOE Office of Science research facility in Princeton, NJ. PPPL receives approximately $78 million annually from DOE. This is the first competition for a contractor in the history of the laboratory. The RFP describes the criteria DOE will use in selecting a successful future management and operating (M&O) contractor. Key criteria include:

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent verification contractor" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Name of Contractor: ActioNet, Inc. Contract Number: DE-DT0003143  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal and Eligible Contractor Use (Contractors must obtain written Federal and Eligible Contractor Use (Contractors must obtain written approval from the DOE Contracting Officer) Name of Contractor: ActioNet, Inc. Contract Number: DE-DT0003143 Expiration Date: 04/12/2014 Brief description of the products or services available: Information Technology Support Services Type of Business: Small Business Extent of Competition: Competed within Alliant Small Business GWAC Contract Specialist: Arness Harris Telephone Number: (202) 287-1601 E-Mail Address: arness.harris@hg.doe.gov For ordering information contact: OCIO COR: Tim Beckham COR Telephone Number: (301) 903-3187 Name of Contractor: DLT Solutions, Inc. Contract Number: DE-AB01-071M00180 Expiration Date: 03/20/2013 Brief description of the products or services available: Red Hat Proprietary Computer Software

322

Policy Flash 2013-39 Acquisition Guide, Chapter 42.15, Contractor  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 Acquisition Guide, Chapter 42.15, Contractor 9 Acquisition Guide, Chapter 42.15, Contractor Performance Information Policy Flash 2013-39 Acquisition Guide, Chapter 42.15, Contractor Performance Information Attached is Policy Flash 2013-39 Acquisition Guide, Chapter 42.15, Contractor Performance Information Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Barbara Binney, of the Office of Acquisition and Project Management Policy at (202) 287-1340 or at Barbara.Binney@hq.doe.gov. Policy Flash AG chapter 4215.pdf AcqGuide42pt15 March 2013.pdf AcqGuide42pt15 attachment March 2013 ratings and narratives.pdf More Documents & Publications Policy Flash 2013-70 Acqusition Guides 42.15 Contractor Performance Infromation and 42.16 reporting Other Contractor Performance into Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Infromation Systems (FAPIIS)

323

Policy Flash 2013-70 Acqusition Guides 42.15 Contractor Performance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Policy Flash 2013-70 Acqusition Guides 42.15 Contractor Performance Policy Flash 2013-70 Acqusition Guides 42.15 Contractor Performance Infromation and 42.16 reporting Other Contractor Performance into Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Infromation Systems (FAPIIS) Policy Flash 2013-70 Acqusition Guides 42.15 Contractor Performance Infromation and 42.16 reporting Other Contractor Performance into Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Infromation Systems (FAPIIS) Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Barbara Binney, of the Office of Acquisition and Project Management Policy at (202) 287-1340 or at Barbara.Binney@hq.doe.gov. Flash AG chapter 4215 final.pdf AcqGuide42pt15 August 1 2013.pdf AcqGuide42pt FAPIIS August 1 2013.pdf More Documents & Publications Contractor Past Performance Information

324

DOE General Counsel Issues Arbitration Guidance for M&O Contractors |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE General Counsel Issues Arbitration Guidance for M&O Contractors DOE General Counsel Issues Arbitration Guidance for M&O Contractors DOE General Counsel Issues Arbitration Guidance for M&O Contractors DOE General Counsel Issues Arbitration Guidance for M&O Contractors (February 3, 2010) Washington, DC - The Office of the General Counsel, in conjunction with the Office of General Counsel of the NNSA, has reviewed the question of whether Department of Energy contractors can include binding arbitration in their contracts with third-parties. We have determined that there is currently no legal prohibition on M&O contractors including binding arbitration clauses in their contracts with others. In fact, we believe it often will be a good idea to include arbitration clauses as ameans of limiting the risk of litigation which is often more

325

U.S. Department of Energy Contractor Project Performance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 June 25, 2011 Submitted by: Energy Enterprise Solutions 20440 Century Blvd. Suite 150 Germantown, MD 20874 Phone 301-916-0050 Fax 301-916-0066 www.eesllc.net V1.7 (June 25, 2011) PARS II CPP Upload Requirements ii Title Page Document Name: Contractor Project Performance (CPP) Upload Requirements for PARS II Version Number: 1.7 Publication Date: June 25, 2011 Contract Number: DE-AT01-06IM00102 Project Number: 1ME07, CLIN 4 Prepared by: Steven Ducharme, Energy Enterprise Solutions, LLC Scott Burns, Energy Enterprise Solutions, LLC Reviewed by: Mark Landry, Dekker, LTD Judith Bernsen, Energy Enterprise Solutions, LLC Dennis Stoner, Energy Enterprise Solutions, LLC Approval: John Makepeace, DOE OECM MA-50, May 25, 2010

326

Standard Measurement and Verification Plan for Lighting Retrofit Projects for Buildings and Building Sites  

SciTech Connect

This document provides a framework for standard measurement and verification (M&V) of lighting retrofit and replacement projects. It was developed to provide site owners, contractors, and other involved organizations with the essential elements of a robust M&V plan for lighting projects. It includes details on all aspects of effectively measuring light levels of existing and post-retrofit projects, conducting power measurement, and developing cost-effectiveness analysis. This framework M&V plan also enables consistent comparison among similar lighting projects, and may be used to develop M&V plans for non--lighting-technology retrofits and new installations.

Richman, Eric E.

2012-10-31T23:59:59.000Z

327

Office of River Protection Assessment of Contractor Quality Assurance and Operational Awareness at Tank Farms, June 2013  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

HIAR-HANFORD-2013-06-17 HIAR-HANFORD-2013-06-17 Site: Hanford, Office of River Protection Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Office of River Protection (ORP) Assessment of Contractor Quality Assurance, Operational Awareness at Hanford Tank Farms Dates of Activity : June 17-20, 2013 Report Preparer: Robert E. Farrell Activity Description/Purpose: The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (Independent Oversight) Site Lead conducted an operational awareness visit to the ORP Hanford Tank Farms, observed a Tank Farms morning meeting, toured the C Tank Farm, and observed a heavy (34,000 pound) lift. Result: Independent Oversight, together with the ORP Facility Representative, toured the C Tank Farm to observe workers setting

328

A practical guide for understanding the Prime Contractor's relationship with b  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

practical guide for understanding the Prime Contractor's relationship with both government practical guide for understanding the Prime Contractor's relationship with both government and corporate environments in the efficient delivery of purchased products and services at the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration's Kansas City Plant. Participate in this procurement forum and you will: * Gain insight on how Honeywell FM&T, a Prime Contractor for the NNSA, procures products and services * Tour the Technology Display Center and see what we do

329

Audit of the Contractor Incentive Program at the Nevada Operations Office, IG-0412  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

20, 1997 20, 1997 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: John C. Layton Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Report on "Audit of the Contractor Incentive Program at the Nevada Operations Office" BACKGROUND: The Department of Energy (Department) is using performance-based contracts to address problems associated with its traditional management and operating contracts. Under this approach, contractor performance is to be evaluated against performance measures which are clearly stated, results-oriented, and established prior to performance. The performance measures, which reflect the Department's expectations of the contractor, are the basis for rewarding superior contractor performance

330

Memo from Deputy Secretary Poneman to DOE Contractor or Financial Assistance Recipient  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The memo from the Deputy Secretary Poneman provides the DOE Contractor or Financial Assistance recipients with timely and clear information about the budget cuts.

331

Diverse Array of Career Resources Help EM Contractor Employees Find New Work  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

More than 1,640 former Office of Environmental Management (EM) contractor employees have received career and outplacement assistance through a program launched by EM early last year.

332

Contractor Sales Training: Providing the Skills Necessary to Sell Comprehensive Home Energy Upgrades  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Many comprehensive home energy efficiency programs rely on contractors as the customer-facing ‘front line’ to sell energy improvements. Adding sales skills to contractors’ existing technical expertise is key to converting more assessments into comprehensive home energy upgrades. Leading programs recognize the need to support contractors with sales and business training to help them succeed and to support the growth of the home performance industry for the long term. A number of contractor sales training efforts are emerging, including some programs that are seeing encouraging early results.

Billingsley, Megan; Stuart, Elizabeth

2011-08-17T23:59:59.000Z

333

DOE O 350.1 Chg 4, Contractor Human Resource Management Programs  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This directive establishes DOE responsibilities and requirements for the management and oversight of contractor Human Resource Management (HR) programs. Chg 1, ...

1996-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

334

Audit of Department of Energy Contractor Occupational Injury and Illness Reporting Practices, IG-0404  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 7, 1997 May 7, 1997 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: John C. Layton Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Report on "Audit of Department of Energy Contractor Occupational Injury and Illness Reporting Practices" BACKGROUND: The Department and its contractors are responsible for ensuring that a safe and healthy work environment is provided to Department and contractor employees at its operating facilities. Contractors are responsible for establishing a comprehensive occupational safety and health program, which includes reporting of significant work- related employee injuries. The Department is responsible

335

DOE O 350.1 Chg 3, Contractor Human Resource Management Programs  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The purpose of this directive is to establish Department of Energy (DOE) responsibilities and requirements for the management and oversight of contractor Human ...

1996-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

336

Final Credentialing Standards for Issuing Personal Identity Verification Cards under HSPD-12  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July July 31, 2008 MEMORANDUM FOR HEADS OF DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES FROM: LINDA M. SPRINGER DIRECTOR ~ SUBJECT: Final Credentialing Standards for Issuing Personal Identity Verification Cards under HSPD-12 This memorandum provides final government-wide credentialing standards to be used by all Federal departments and agencies in determining whether to issue or revoke personal identity verification (PIV) cards to their employees and contractor personnel, including those who are non-United States citizens. These standards replace the interim standards issued in December 2007. The authority is section 2.3(b) of Executive Order 13467 of June 30, 2008.1 In addition to the requirements in this memorandum, credentialing determinations are also subject to the requirements of Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD) 12 and issuances developed by the National Institute

337

Surveillance Guide - CMS 3.3 Verification of System Configuration and Operations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

VERIFICATION OF SYSTEM CONFIGURATION AND OPERATIONS VERIFICATION OF SYSTEM CONFIGURATION AND OPERATIONS 1.0 Objective The objective of this surveillance is for the Facility Representative to verify that the facility's configuration and operations are consistent with facility design basis documentation. These surveillance activities provide a basis for evaluating the effectiveness of the contractor's program for implementing design basis requirements and for ensuring compliance with DOE requirements. 2.0 References 2.1 DOE 4700.1, Project Management System 2.2 DOE 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities 2.3 DOE 5480.23, Safety Analysis Reports 2.4 DOE-STD-1073-93, Guide for Operational Configuration Management 3.0 Requirements Implemented This surveillance is conducted to implement requirements CM-0009

338

Independent Activity Report, Savannah River Remediation - July 2010 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Remediation - July 2010 Remediation - July 2010 Independent Activity Report, Savannah River Remediation - July 2010 July 2010 Savannah River Operations Office Integrated Safety Management System Phase II Verification Review of Savannah River Remediation The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), participated in the DOE Savannah River Operations Office (DOE-SR), Office of Safety and Quality Assurance (OSQA), Technical Support Division (TSD) Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS), Phase II Verification of Savannah River Remediation (SRR). The purpose of the DOE-SR Phase II ISMS Verification was to verify that the SRR ISMS Description that was submitted to and approved by the DOE-SR Manager is being effectively implemented at the Savannah

339

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - July 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Los Alamos National Laboratory - July Los Alamos National Laboratory - July 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - July 2012 July 2012 Review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Implementation Verification Review at Technical Area-55 This report documents the independent review of the implementation verification review (IVR) process at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) plutonium facility at Technical Area-55 (TA-55) conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), which is within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations from May 1 - 17, 2012. Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - July 2012 More Documents & Publications

340

Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - January 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oak Ridge National Laboratory - Oak Ridge National Laboratory - January 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - January 2013 January 2013 Review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor Implementation Verification Review Processes This report documents the independent review of Implementation Verification Review (IVR) processes at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), which is within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations during the periods of August 20-24 and September 25-28, 2012. Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - January 2013 More Documents & Publications

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent verification contractor" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Independent Oversight Review, Idaho Site - November 2011 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site - November 2011 Site - November 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Idaho Site - November 2011 November 2011 Review of Implementation Verification Review Processes at the Idaho Site - Phase 1 of 2 This report documents the first phase of an independent review of implementation verification review (IVR) processes at the Idaho Site conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The purpose of the complete Independent Oversight review is to evaluate, in two phases, the processes and methods used at the Idaho Site for verifying implementation of new or substantially revised facility safety basis hazard controls. The objective of this Phase 1 assessment was to evaluate the extent to which the Idaho Operations Office (DOE-ID) and primary facility

342

Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - January 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oak Ridge National Laboratory - Oak Ridge National Laboratory - January 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - January 2013 January 2013 Review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor Implementation Verification Review Processes This report documents the independent review of Implementation Verification Review (IVR) processes at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), which is within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations during the periods of August 20-24 and September 25-28, 2012. Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - January 2013 More Documents & Publications

343

A New Verification Score for Public Forecasts  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

CREF, a new verification score for public forecasts, is introduced. This verification score rewards a forecaster who forecasts a rare event accurately. CREF was used to verify local forecasts at the Weather Service Forecast Office (WSFO) in ...

Dean P. Gulezian

1981-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

344

Scientific Verification of Deterministic River Stage Forecasts  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

One element of a complete verification system is the ability to determine why forecasts behave as they do. This paper describes and demonstrates an operationally feasible method for conducting this type of diagnostic verification analysis. ...

Edwin Welles; Soroosh Sorooshian

2009-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

345

Forecast verification: Its Complexity and Dimensionality  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Two fundamental characteristics of forecast verification problems—complexity and dimensionality—are described. To develop quantitative definitions of these characteristics, a general framework for the problem of absolute verification (AV) is ...

Allan H. Murphy

1991-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

346

RENEWABLES PORTFOLIO STANDARD 2006 PROCUREMENT VERIFICATION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission DRAFT STAFF REPORT RENEWABLES PORTFOLIO STANDARD 2007 PROCUREMENT VERIFICATION RPS 2007 Verification Report APRIL 2011 CEC3002011002SD #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Gina Executive Director DISCLAIMER Staff members of the California Energy Commission prepared this report

347

Verification and validation of simulation models  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In this paper we discuss verification and validation of simulation models. Four different approaches to deciding model validity are described; two different paradigms that relate verification and validation to the model development process are presented; ...

Robert G. Sargent

2009-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

348

Proposed 708 Criteria and Procedures for DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Department of Energy (DOE) proposes amendments for its contractor employee protection program which provides recourse to DOE contractor employees who believe they have been retaliated against for activities such as a disclosure of information regarding management of environmental, safety, health, and other matters, for participating in Congressional proceedings, or for refusing to engage in illegal or dangerous activities.

349

Guidelines for the Monitoring, Evaluation, Reporting, Verification...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Evaluation, Reporting, Verification, and Certification of Forestry Projects for Climate Change Mitigation Title Guidelines for the Monitoring, Evaluation, Reporting,...

350

Nuclear Verification | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Verification | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our...

351

K Basins Field Verification Program  

SciTech Connect

The Field Verification Program establishes a uniform and systematic process to ensure that technical information depicted on selected engineering drawings accurately reflects the actual existing physical configuration. This document defines the Field Verification Program necessary to perform the field walkdown and inspection process that identifies the physical configuration of the systems required to support the mission objectives of K Basins. This program is intended to provide an accurate accounting of the actual field configuration by documenting the as-found information on a controlled drawing.

Booth, H.W.

1994-12-02T23:59:59.000Z

352

DOE/NNSA Facility Management Contracts Facility Owner Contractor  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Facility Management Contracts Facility Management Contracts Facility Owner Contractor Award Date End Date Options/Award Term Ultimate Potential Expiration Date Contract FY Competed Parent Companies/ LLC Partners DOE Site Procurement Director DOE Contracting Officer SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC) SC Stanford University DE-AC03-76SF00515 1/25/1981 9/30/2017 9/30/2017 M&O 1981 Stanford University Barbara Jackson 865-576-0976 Kyong H. Watson 650-926-5203 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) SC Battelle Memorial Institute DE-AC05-76RL01830 12/30/2002 9/30/2017 9/30/2017 M&O 1965 Battelle Memorial Institute Barbara Jackson 865-576-0976 Ryan Kilbury 509-372-4030 Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) SC Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC DE-AC02-98CH10886 1/5/1998 1/4/2015 1/4/2015 M&O 1998 Battelle Memorial Institute

353

DOE/NNSA Facility Management Contracts Facility Owner Contractor  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Facility Management Contracts Facility Management Contracts Facility Owner Contractor Award Date End Date Options/Award Term Ultimate Potential Expiration Date Contract FY Competed Parent Companies/ LLC Partners DOE Site Procurement Director DOE Contracting Officer SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC) SC Stanford University DE-AC03-76SF00515 1/25/1981 9/30/2017 9/30/2017 M&O 1981 Stanford University Barbara Jackson 865-576-0976 Kyong H. Watson 650-926-5203 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) SC Battelle Memorial Institute DE-AC05-76RL01830 12/30/2002 9/30/2017 9/30/2017 M&O 1965 Battelle Memorial Institute Barbara Jackson 865-576-0976 Ryan Kilbury 509-372-4030 Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) SC Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC DE-AC02-98CH10886 1/5/1998 1/4/2015 1/4/2015 M&O 1998 Battelle Memorial Institute

354

UMTRA technical assistance contractor Quality Assurance Program Plan. Revision 4  

SciTech Connect

This Quality Assurance Program Plan (QAPP) provides the primary requirements for the integration of quality functions into all Technical Assistance Contractor (TAC) Project organization activities. The QAPP is the written directive authorized by the TAC Program Manager to accomplish this task and to implement procedures that provide the controls and sound management practices needed to ensure TAC contractual obligations are met. The QA program is designed to use monitoring, audit, and surveillance functions as management tools to ensure that all Project organization functions are executed in a manner that will protect public health and safety, promote the success of the Project, and meet or exceed contract requirements. The key to ensuring compliance with this directive is a two-step professional approach: utilize the quality system in all areas of activity, and generate a personal commitment from all personnel to provide quality service. The quality staff will be experienced, trained professionals capable of providing maximum flexibility to Project goal attainment. Such flexibility will enable the staff to be more cost effective and to further improve communication and coordination. To provide control details, this QAPP will be supplemented by approved standard operating procedures that provide requirements for performing the various TAC quality-related activities. These procedures shall describe applicable design input and document control activities and documentation.

Pehrson, P.

1993-10-12T23:59:59.000Z

355

Nuclear criticality safety training: guidelines for DOE contractors  

SciTech Connect

The DOE Order 5480.1A, Chapter V, Safety of Nuclear Facilities, establishes safety procedures and requirements for DOE nuclear facilities. This guide has been developed as an aid to implementing the Chapter V requirements pertaining to nuclear criticality safety training. The guide outlines relevant conceptual knowledge and demonstrated good practices in job performance. It addresses training program operations requirements in the areas of employee evaluations, employee training records, training program evaluations, and training program records. It also suggests appropriate feedback mechanisms for criticality safety training program improvement. The emphasis is on academic rather than hands-on training. This allows a decoupling of these guidelines from specific facilities. It would be unrealistic to dictate a universal program of training because of the wide variation of operations, levels of experience, and work environments among DOE contractors and facilities. Hence, these guidelines do not address the actual implementation of a nuclear criticality safety training program, but rather they outline the general characteristics that should be included.

Crowell, M.R.

1983-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

356

Audit of health benefit costs at the Department`s Management and Operating Contractors  

SciTech Connect

The audit disclosed that the Department and certain of its contractors had initiated several positive actions to contain health benefit costs: improving data collection, increasing training, reviewing changes to health plans, improving the language in one contract, increasing the employees, share of health costs at one contractor, and initiating self-insurance at another contractor. Despite these actions, further improvements are needed in the administration of the contractor employee health benefit plans. It was found that the Department did not have the policies and procedures necessary to ensure that the health benefit costs met the tests for reasonableness. The audit of $95 million in health benefit costs incurred at six Management and Operating contractors showed that $15.4 million of these costs were excessive compared to national norms.

1994-06-23T23:59:59.000Z

357

Economic Impact of 8(a) and Native American Contractors | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Economic Impact of 8(a) and Native American Contractors Economic Impact of 8(a) and Native American Contractors Economic Impact of 8(a) and Native American Contractors August 14, 2012 - 2:25pm Addthis Jennine Elias Jennine Elias Director of External Affairs for the Native American Contractors Association Editor's Note: This blog post was guest written by Jennine Elias, Director of External Affairs for the Native American Contractors Association (www.nativecontractors.org) What is Native 8(a) and how do Tribes, Alaska Native Corporation, and Native Hawaiian Organizations fit into the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) Business Development Program? According to the SBA, this program, which was named for Section 8(a) of the Small Business Act, was created to help small and disadvantaged businesses compete in the marketplace. It also helps these companies gain access to

358

Independent Oversight Review, Nevada Site Office and National Security  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site Office and National Site Office and National Security Technologies, LLC - November 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Nevada Site Office and National Security Technologies, LLC - November 2011 November 2011 Review of Nevada Site Office and National Security Technologies, LLC, Line Oversight and Contractor Assurance Systems Self-Assessment The purpose of this independent oversight review by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), was to shadow the Nevada Site Office (NSO) and the National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec), line oversight and contractor assurance systems (LOCAS) self-assessment conducted September 19 - 23, 2011, at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS). The NSO/NSTec self-assessment focused on:

359

Independent Oversight Activity Report, Office of River Protection - May  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of River Protection - Office of River Protection - May 2013 Independent Oversight Activity Report, Office of River Protection - May 2013 May 2013 Operational Awareness Visit at the Office of River Protection [HAIR-HANFORD-2013-05-13] The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (HS-45) Site Lead conducted an operational awareness visit to the Office of River Protection (ORP) to observe contractor efforts to develop a hazards analysis for the Low Activity Waste facility of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP), tour the WTP construction site, observe ORP's quality assurance audit of the WTP contractor (Bechtel National, Inc.), tour the Hanford Tank Farms, and observe tank waste retrieval operations. Independent Oversight Activity Report, Office of River Protection - May

360

Class 1E software verification and validation: Past, present, and future  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper discusses work in progress that addresses software verification and validation (V&V) as it takes place during the full software life cycle of safety-critical software. The paper begins with a brief overview of the task description and discussion of the historical evolution of software V&V. A new perspective is presented which shows the entire verification and validation process from the viewpoints of a software developer, product assurance engineer, independent V&V auditor, and government regulator. An account of the experience of the field test of the Verification Audit Plan and Report generated from the V&V Guidelines is presented along with sample checklists and lessons learned from the verification audit experience. Then, an approach to automating the V&V Guidelines is introduced. The paper concludes with a glossary and bibliography.

Persons, W.L.; Lawrence, J.D.

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent verification contractor" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Independent Oversight Review, Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant - November 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant - November 2013 November 5, 2013 Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of the preparedness of the DOE Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office, contractors at the DOE Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant, and selected non-leased facilities to respond to a severe natural phenomena event (NPE). The review was conducted in July and August 2013 by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, which is within the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations performed this

362

Sharing lessons learned and best practices in deactivation and decommissioning techniques among U.S. Department of Energy contractors  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Approximately $153.2 billion of work currently remains in the United States Department of Energy's (DOE's) Office of Environmental Management (EM) life cycle budget for United States projects. Contractors who manage facilities for the DOE have been challenged to identify transformational changes to reduce the life cycle costs and develop a knowledge management system that identifies, disseminates, and tracks the implementation of lessons learned and best practices. At the request of the DOE's EM Office of Engineering and Technology, the Energy Facility Contractors Group (EFCOG) responded to the challenge with formation of the Deactivation and Decommissioning (D and D) and Facility Engineering (DD/FE) Working Group. Since October 2006, members have already made significant progress in realizing their goals: adding new D and D best practices to the existing EFCOG Best Practices database; participating in lessons learned forums; and contributing to a DOE initiative on identifying technology needs. The group is also participating in a DOE project management initiative to develop implementation guidelines, as well as a DOE radiation protection initiative to institute a more predictable and standardized approach to approving authorized limits and independently verifying cleanup completion at EM sites. Finally, a D and D hotline to provide real-time solutions to D and D challenges is also being launched. (authors)

Lackey, Michael B. [Deactivation and Decommissioning, Fluor, PO Box 1050, MSIN B4-09, Richland, WA 99352 (United States); Waisley, Sandra L. [D and D and Facility Engineering, US Department of Energy, Environmental Management, 1000 Independence Ave SW, Washington, DC 20585 (United States); Dusek, Lansing G. [Regulatory Affairs for Nuclear Operations, Fluor, 100 Fluor Daniel Drive, PW503N, Greenville, SC 29607 (United States)

2007-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

363

River Protection Project Integrated safety management system phase II verification report, volumes I and II - 8/19/99  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Department of Energy policy (DOE P 450.4) is that safety is integrated into all aspects of the management and operations of its facilities. In simple and straightforward terms, the Department will ''Do work safely.'' The purpose of this River Protection Project (RPP) Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) Phase II Verification was to determine whether ISMS programs and processes are implemented within RFP to accomplish the goal of ''Do work safely.'' The goal of an implemented ISMS is to have a single integrated system that includes Environment, Safety, and Health (ES&H) requirements in the work planning and execution processes to ensure the protection of the worker, public, environment, and federal property over the RPP life cycle. The ISMS is comprised of the (1) described functions, components, processes, and interfaces (system map or blueprint) and (2) personnel who are executing those assigned roles and responsibilities to manage and control the ISMS. Therefore, this review evaluated both the ''paper'' and ''people'' aspects of the ISMS to ensure that the system is implemented within RPP. Richland Operations Office (RL) conducted an ISMS Phase I Verification of the TWRS from September 28-October 9, 1998. The resulting verification report recommended that TWRS-RL and the contractor proceed with Phase II of ISMS verification given that the concerns identified from the Phase I verification review are incorporated into the Phase II implementation plan.

SHOOP, D.S.

1999-09-10T23:59:59.000Z

364

Fingerprint verification using statistical descriptors  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The importance of high precision matching in fingerprint cannot be over-emphasized. This paper presents a novel fingerprint verification algorithm which improves matching accuracy by overcoming the shortcomings of poor image quality. The proposed method ... Keywords: Biometrics, Fingerprint, Reliability, Singular point, Statistical analysis

Mohammed S. Khalil; Dzulkifli Mohamad; Muhammad Khurram Khan; Qais Al-Nuzaili

2010-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

365

Carbon Storage Monitoring, Verification and Accounting Research |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Monitoring, Verification and Accounting Research Monitoring, Verification and Accounting Research Carbon Storage Monitoring, Verification and Accounting Research Reliable and cost-effective monitoring, verification and accounting (MVA) techniques are an important part of making geologic sequestration a safe, effective, and acceptable method for greenhouse gas control. MVA of geologic storage sites is expected to serve several purposes, including addressing safety and environmental concerns; inventory verification; project and national accounting of greenhouse gas emissions reductions at geologic storage sites; and evaluating potential regional, national, and international greenhouse gas reduction goals. The goal of our program area is to develop and demonstrate a broad portfolio of technologies, applications, and accounting requirements that

366

Electric Vehicle Handbook: Electrical Contractors (Brochure), NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory)  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (EERE)

Electrical Electrical Contractors Plug-In Electric Vehicle Handbook for Electrical Contractors 2 Table of Contents Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 PEV Basics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Charging Basics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Installing and Maintaining EVSE . . . . . . . 9 EVSE Training for Electrical Contractors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Electrifying the Future . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Clean Cities Helps Deploy PEV Charging Infrastructure Installing plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) charg- ing infrastructure requires unique knowledge and skills . If you need help, contact your local Clean Cities coordinator . Clean Cities is the U .S . Depart- ment of Energy's flagship alternative-transportation deployment initiative . It is supported by a diverse and capable team of stakeholders from private companies, utilities, government agencies, vehicle

367

ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION NOTIFICATION FORM Grantee/Contractor Laboratory: Princeton University/Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EVALUATION NOTIFICATION FORM EVALUATION NOTIFICATION FORM Grantee/Contractor Laboratory: Princeton University/Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) Project! Activity Title: STS-100 Test Stand Experiment NEPA Tracking No.: Type of Funding _ _ --=S=C'---_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ B&R Code: Total Estimated Cost _ _ ---"'$=2=-OO"'-',=OO=O"--_ _ _ _ _ _ _ DOE Cognizant Secretarial Officer (CSO):--'W~il=lia=m~F'-'-.-"=B=r=in=km=a=n'__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Contractor Project Manager: ____ -_-_--_--_-_--_-_-_ _ _ _ _ Signature: ------------- Contractor NEPA Reviewer: Jerry D. Levine Date: ( S--Q--------f-- /:/1 Signature: "~ ~ ~ Date: I ~lJO I * I. Description of Proposed Action: The proposed action would consist of operation of a 100

368

Independent Oversight Evaluation, Pantex Plant - November 2000 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Evaluation, Pantex Plant - November 2000 Independent Oversight Evaluation, Pantex Plant - November 2000 Independent Oversight Evaluation, Pantex Plant - November 2000 November 2000 Evaluation of the Pantex Plant Emergency Response Exercise The Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (Independent Oversight) conducted an evaluation of the annual emergency response exercise "Verser Partout" at the Pantex Plant during the week of August 28, 2000. The purposes of the evaluation were to determine how effectively DOE and contractor line management at the Pantex Plant have prepared for and are capable of responding to an accident involving hazardous materials, and how effectively the exercise was planned, conducted, and self-evaluated as a means for testing the plant's emergency response capability and

369

Independent directors in China.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

??This thesis examines the development of the independent director system in China. The newly introduced independent director system is viewed as a revolutionary change to… (more)

Ma, Lijun

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

370

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - July 2011 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 2011 July 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - July 2011 July 2011 Review of Electrical System Configuration Management and Design Change Control at the Savannah River Site, Waste Solidification Building Project The Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of selected engineering processes for the Waste Solidification Building (WSB) safety significant electrical system at the Savannah River Site (SRS). The purpose of this review was to assess the adequacy of the contractor's electrical system configuration management and design change control during construction and initial system turnover activities. Interviews and reviewed WSB Project Electrical System DCFs, an SDDR, and

371

Verification and transparency in future arms control  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Verification`s importance has changed dramatically over time, although it always has been in the forefront of arms control. The goals and measures of verification and the criteria for success have changed with the times as well, reflecting such factors as the centrality of the prospective agreement to East-West relations during the Cold War, the state of relations between the United States and the Soviet Union, and the technologies available for monitoring. Verification`s role may be declining in the post-Cold War period. The prospects for such a development will depend, first and foremost, on the high costs of traditional arms control, especially those associated with requirements for verification. Moreover, the growing interest in informal, or non-negotiated arms control does not allow for verification provisions by the very nature of these arrangements. Multilateral agreements are also becoming more prominent and argue against highly effective verification measures, in part because of fears of promoting proliferation by opening sensitive facilities to inspectors from potential proliferant states. As a result, it is likely that transparency and confidence-building measures will achieve greater prominence, both as supplements to and substitutes for traditional verification. Such measures are not panaceas and do not offer all that we came to expect from verification during the Cold war. But they may be the best possible means to deal with current problems of arms reductions and restraints at acceptable levels of expenditure.

Pilat, J.F.

1996-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

372

Some thoughts on model verification  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The most powerful attribute of numerical models for simulating fluid flow in partially saturated fractured media is that they can handle arbitrarily complex problems in terms of geometry, heterogeneity and forcing functions. In contrast, analytical solutions can be only obtained for relatively simple problems. Therefore, the very power of the numerical models that is to be exploited is unnecessarily abridged if the numerical method is viewed merely as a tool for approximately solving the partial differential equation. A broader definition of verification is needed in order to exploit the power and generality of numerical models. In the ultimate, verification should be dictated by axiomatic testability. The development of self-verifying numerical models is a challenge that deserves pursuit.

Narasimhan, T.N.

1987-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

373

Electric Utility Measurement & Verification Program  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

BC Hydro is an electric utility with a service area covering over 95% of the province of British Columbia in Canada. Power Smart is BC Hydro’s demand-side-management (DSM) division. Power Smart develops, operates and manages various DSM programs for residential, commercial and industrial customers. The Measurement and Verification (M&V) of applicable Power Smart Industrial projects is the process of verifying the results of the implementation of energy conservation measures (ECMs) at industrial customer facilities. Power Smart M&V activities are based on the International Performance Measurement & Verification Protocol (IPMVP); a consensus document produced with the international support of industry and government. This paper discusses BC Hydro’s M&V program and the M&V results from industrial projects. Several case history studies will also be reviewed. The case studies reviewed involve aeration motor speed controls upgrade, steam turbine controls upgrade and natural gas liquid pump speed controls upgrade.

Lau, K.; Henderson, G.; Hebert, D.

2007-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

374

Charitable Giving by EM Employees, Contractors Tops $800,000 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Charitable Giving by EM Employees, Contractors Tops $800,000 Charitable Giving by EM Employees, Contractors Tops $800,000 Charitable Giving by EM Employees, Contractors Tops $800,000 February 29, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Shown here are some of the thousands of items employees at the Savannah River Site collected for Toys for Tots. Shown here are some of the thousands of items employees at the Savannah River Site collected for Toys for Tots. WASHINGTON, D.C. - EM employees and their contractor counterparts donated more than $800,000 and other gifts to people in need in recent months. The charitable giving drives were administered through multiple efforts, including the latest Combined Federal Campaign season that ended this month. The campaign is a workplace charitable giving drive for employees in the federal workplace. Employees at EM headquarters donated more than $91,000

375

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 05-01: Contractor Investigation, Causal Analysis, and Corrective Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedures for Enforcement, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity for the Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) to periodically issue clarifying guidance regarding the processes used in its enforcement activities. Such guidance is typically issued in the form of an Enforcement Guidance Supplement (EGS). As part of the investigation of potential nuclear safety noncompliances, OE routinely reviews the contractor's investigation of the noncompliance, the associated causal analysis, and the corrective actions developed by the contractor to resolve the noncompliance and prevent recurrence. A high percentage of enforcement actions undertaken by OE feature recurrent events or deficiencies, indicating weaknesses associated with contractor processes to develop and implement effective corrective actions. In response, OE has developed this EGS to disseminate information regarding observed deficiencies as a potential lessons -learned for the DOE contractor community. Attachment A provides enforcement case examples highlighting performance deficiencies specific to this subject area.

376

Reply Comments of Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group to DOE Notice of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reply Comments of Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group to DOE Reply Comments of Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group to DOE Notice of Inquiry Reply Comments of Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group to DOE Notice of Inquiry Reply comments by the ad hoc Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group (the "Group") in response to various comments submitted to the U.S. Department of Energy on its Federal Register "Notice of Inquiry concerning preparation of report to Congress on the Price-Anderson Act" of December 31, 1997. 62 Fed.Reg. 68272. The Group is comprised of comprised of Bechtel National, Inc., BNFL, Inc., BWX Technologies, Inc., Duke Engineering & Services, Inc., Fluor Corporation, Johnson Controls World Services Corporation, Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company, Nuclear Fuel Services,

377

DOE Programs and Major Site/Facility Contractors | Scientific and Technical  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

DOE Programs and Major Site/Facility Contractors DOE Programs and Major Site/Facility Contractors Print page Print page Email page Email page DOE Programs and Major Site/Facility Contractors have the option to provide metadata via the Announcement Notice 241.1 web notice, Batch Upload, or Harvesting. The metadata-based announcement notice generated and supplied by DOE and contractors for unclassified STI products includes the basic Dublin Core metadata elements, supplemented by a few DOE data elements, and a minimal number of subelements necessary to further identify the announcement/availability of the STI product. Principal Investigators and Authors A Principal Investigator is designated by a research organization to have an appropriate level of authority and responsibility for the proper conduct of the research, the use of funds, and administrative requirements,

378

Charitable Giving by EM Employees, Contractors Tops $800,000 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Charitable Giving by EM Employees, Contractors Tops $800,000 Charitable Giving by EM Employees, Contractors Tops $800,000 Charitable Giving by EM Employees, Contractors Tops $800,000 February 29, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Shown here are some of the thousands of items employees at the Savannah River Site collected for Toys for Tots. Shown here are some of the thousands of items employees at the Savannah River Site collected for Toys for Tots. WASHINGTON, D.C. - EM employees and their contractor counterparts donated more than $800,000 and other gifts to people in need in recent months. The charitable giving drives were administered through multiple efforts, including the latest Combined Federal Campaign season that ended this month. The campaign is a workplace charitable giving drive for employees in the federal workplace. Employees at EM headquarters donated more than $91,000

379

Cyberplaces: The Internet Guide for Architects, Engineers and Contractors with Cdrom  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

From the Publisher:From a well-known authority on this subject, this book is the only available guide to the practical application of Internet, Intranet, and related technology specifically for architect, contractors, and facilities managers. This product ...

Paul Doherty

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

380

Identifying environmental safety and health requirements for an Environmental Restoration Management Contractor  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of the Standards/Requirements Identification Program, developed partially in response to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 90-2, was to identify applicable requirements that established the Environmental Restoration Management Contractor`s (ERMC) responsibilities and authorities under the Environmental Restoration Management Contract, determine the adequacy of these requirements, ascertain a baseline level of compliance with them, and implement a maintenance program that would keep the program current as requirements or compliance levels change. The resultant Standards/Requirements Identification Documents (S/RIDs) consolidate the applicable requirements. These documents govern the development of procedures and manuals to ensure compliance with the requirements. Twenty-four such documents, corresponding with each functional area identified at the site, are to be issued. These requirements are included in the contractor`s management plan.

Beckman, W.H.; Cossel, S.C.; Alhadeff, N. [Fernald Environmental Restoration Management Corp., Cincinnati, OH (United States). Fernald Environmental Management Project; Porco, D.J. [Jacobs Engineering Co., Pasadena, CA (United States); Lindamood, S.B. [Jacobs Engineering Co., Pasadena, CA (United States); Beers, J.A. [Fluor Daniel Corp. (United States)

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent verification contractor" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Practical matters for defense contractors converting DoD technology to commercial markets  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This thesis asks if and how the defense contractor can profitably transfer the technology and institutional learning obtained from DoD funded R&D to commercial markets. There are numerous examples of very successful defense ...

Ting, Carina Maria

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

382

CONTRACTOR REPORT SAND952729 Unlimited Release U G A Q O D  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

r x 12-N -. CONTRACTOR REPORT SAND952729 Unlimited Release U G A Q O D Evaluation of Polyacrylonitrile (PAN) as a Binding Polymer for Absorbers Used to-Treat Liquid Radioactive...

383

Programmatic Baseline Summary for Phase 1 Privatization for the Tank Farm contractor  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The document describes the systematic integrated baseline planning process and provides a summary of the Tank Farm Contractor scope, schedule and cost analysis developed in support of the Phase 1 privatization mission.

DIEDIKER, J.A.

2000-04-22T23:59:59.000Z

384

Directory of DOE and contractor personnel involved in non-government standards activities  

SciTech Connect

This document contains a listing of DOE employees and DOE contractors who have submitted form DOE F 1300.2, Record of Non-Government Standards Activity. Additional names were added from rosters supplied by non-Government standards bodies.

NONE

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

385

AEC AND CONTRACTOR SS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT MEETING, MAY 25-28, 1959, GERMANTOWN, MARYLAND  

SciTech Connect

The papers prepared and presented by the Atomic Energy Commission and Contractor Personnel are presented. The meeting covered a broad range of problems encountered in the AEC and SS Materials Management work. (W.L.H.)

1960-10-31T23:59:59.000Z

386

GAO-04-148R Department of Energy: Reimbursement of Contractor Litigation Costs  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

GAO-04-148R Contractor Litigation Costs GAO-04-148R Contractor Litigation Costs United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 November 26, 2003 The Honorable Edward J. Markey House of Representatives Subject: Department of Energy: Reimbursement of Contractor Litigation Costs Dear Mr. Markey: The Department of Energy (DOE) contracts with not-for-profit universities and private companies to operate its facilities. As part of the cost of operating these facilities, DOE can reimburse its contractors for the litigation costs associated with cases brought against them. Each year the department spends millions of dollars in such reimbursements. For the most part, litigation expenses involve the costs of outside counsel and resulting judgments and settlements for a variety of types of

387

Independent Oversight Follow-up Review, Savannah River National Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Savannah River National Savannah River National Laboratory - January 2012 Independent Oversight Follow-up Review, Savannah River National Laboratory - January 2012 January 2012 Follow-up Review of Implementation Verification Reviews at the Savannah River National Laboratory Savannah River Site The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the identification and implementation of safety basis hazard controls associated with "flashing spray release" and supporting information documented in the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) WSRC-SA-2, SRNL Technical Area Documented Safety Analysis, Revision 10; WSRC-TS-97-00014, SRNL Technical Area Technical Safety Requirements,

388

Review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor Implementation Verification Review Processes  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Independent Oversight Review of the Independent Oversight Review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor Implementation Verification Review Processes May 2011 January 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U. S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background........................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Scope..................................................................................................................................................... 2

389

Review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor Implementation Verification Review Processes  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Review of the Independent Oversight Review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor Implementation Verification Review Processes May 2011 January 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U. S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background........................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Scope..................................................................................................................................................... 2

390

Verification survey report of the south waste tank farm training/test tower and hazardous waste storage lockers at the West Valley demonstration project, West Valley, New York  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A team from ORAU's Independent Environmental Assessment and Verification Program performed verification survey activities on the South Test Tower and four Hazardous Waste Storage Lockers. Scan data collected by ORAU determined that both the alpha and alpha-plus-beta activity was representative of radiological background conditions. The count rate distribution showed no outliers that would be indicative of alpha or alpha-plus-beta count rates in excess of background. It is the opinion of ORAU that independent verification data collected support the site?s conclusions that the South Tower and Lockers sufficiently meet the site criteria for release to recycle and reuse.

Weaver, Phyllis C.

2012-08-29T23:59:59.000Z

391

VERIFICATION SURVEY REPORT OF THE SOUTH WASTE TANK FARM TRAINING/TEST TOWER AND HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE LOCKERS AT THE WEST VALLEY DEMONSTRATION PROJECT WEST VALLEY, NEW YORK  

SciTech Connect

A team from ORAU’s Independent Environmental Assessment and Verification Program performed verification survey activities on the South Test Tower and four Hazardous Waste Storage Lockers. Scan data collected by ORAU determined that both the alpha and alpha-plus-beta activity was representative of radiological background conditions. The count rate distribution showed no outliers that would be indicative of alpha or alpha-plus-beta count rates in excess of background. It is the opinion of ORAU that independent verification data collected support the site’s conclusions that the South Tower and Lockers sufficiently meet the site criteria for release to recycle and reuse.

Phyllis C. Weaver

2012-08-29T23:59:59.000Z

392

Tank waste remediation system retrieval and disposal mission readiness-to-proceed responses to internal independent assessment  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy (DOE) is planning to make critical decisions during fiscal year (FY) 1998 regarding privatization contracts for the treatment of Hanford tank waste. Specifically, DOE, Richland Operations Office (RL), will make decisions related to proceeding with Phase 1 Privatization. In support of these decisions, the management and integration (M+I) contractor must be able to meet the requirements to support the Phase 1 privatization contractors. As part of the assessment of the Tank Waste Retrieval (TWR) Readiness-To-Proceed (RTP), an independent review of their process and products was required by the RL letter of August 8, 1997. The Independent Review Team reviewed the adequacy of the planning that has been done by the M+I contractor to validate that, if the plans are carried out, there is reasonable assurance of success. Overall, the RTP Independent Review Team concluded that, if the planning by the M+I contractor team is carried out with adequate funding, there is reasonable assurance that the M+I contractor will be able to deliver waste to the privatization contractor for the duration of Phase 1. This conclusion was based on addressing the recommendations contained in the Independent Review Team`s Final Report and in the individual Criteria and Review Approach (CRA) forms completed during the assessment. The purpose of this report is to formally document the independent assessment and the RTP team responses to the Independent Review Team recommendations. It also provides closure logics for selected recommendations from a Lockheed Martin Hanford Corporation (LMHC) internal assessment of the Technical Basis Review (TBR) packages. This report contains the RTP recommendation closure process (Section 2.0); the closure tables (Section 3.0) which provide traceability between each review team recommendation and its corresponding Project Hanford Management Contract closure logic; and two attachments that formally document the Independent Review Team Final Report and the Internal Assessment Final Report.

Schaus, P.S.

1998-01-06T23:59:59.000Z

393

Independent Oversight Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 Independent Oversight Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 May 2013 Lessons Learned from Targeted Reviews of Implementation Verification Review Processes at Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities This report summarizes and analyzes the results of independent reviews of IVR and associated processes at eight DOE sites conducted by Independent Oversight from August 2011 to September 2012. The purpose of the Independent Oversight review was to evaluate the processes and methods used for verifying the implementation of safety basis hazard controls and periodically re-verifying that the controls remain in place. Independent Oversight Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 More Documents & Publications Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Site CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation

394

River Protection Project (RPP) Readiness to Proceed 2 Internal Independent Review Team Final Report  

SciTech Connect

This report describes the results of an independent review team brought in to assess CH2M Hill Hanford Group's readiness and ability to support the RPP's move into its next major phase - retrieval and delivery of tank waste to the Privatization Contractor

SCHAUS, P.S.

2000-03-29T23:59:59.000Z

395

River Protection Project (RPP) Readiness to Proceed 2 Internal Independent Review Team Final Report  

SciTech Connect

This report describes the results of an independent review team brought in to assess CH2M HILL Hanford's readiness and ability to support the RPP's move into its next major phase - retrieval and delivery of tank waste to the Privatization Contractor.

SCHAUS, P.S.

2000-03-15T23:59:59.000Z

396

Development of a Monitoring and Verification (M&V) Plan and Baseline for the Fort Hood ESPC Project  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Fort Hood has selected an Energy Services Performance Contract (ESPC) contractor to help achieve its energy reduction goals as mandated by Executive Order. This ESPC is expected to be a $3.8 million, 20 year contract, which includes five primary types of Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs) in 56 buildings, and includes boiler insulation, control system upgrades, vending machine controls, cooling tower variable frequency drives (VFDs), and lighting retrofits. The plan of action for the ESPC includes cost effective M&V, using IPMVP Options B and C for the first two years after the retrofits are installed, and Option A combined with annual performance verification for the remainder of the contract. This paper discusses the development the Measurement and Verification (M&V) Plan for the Fort Hood Energy Services Performance Contract, and includes results of the baseline calculations (Haberl et al. 2002, 2003b).

Haberl, J. S.; Liu, Z.; Baltazar-Cervantes, J. C.; Lynn, B.; Underwood, D.

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

397

Development and Verification of a Computational Fluid Dynamics Model of a Horizontal-Axis Tidal Current Turbine  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Development and Verification of Development and Verification of a Computational Fluid Dynamics Model of a Horizontal-Axis Tidal Current Turbine M.J. Lawson and Y. Li. National Renewable Energy Laboratory D.C. Sale University of Washington Presented at the 30 th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Rotterdam, The Netherlands June 19-24, 2011 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Conference Paper NREL/CP-5000-50981 October 2011 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE The submitted manuscript has been offered by an employee of the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC (Alliance), a contractor of the US Government under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Accordingly, the US

398

Input apparatus for dynamic signature verification systems  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

The disclosure relates to signature verification input apparatus comprising a writing instrument and platen containing piezoelectric transducers which generate signals in response to writing pressures.

EerNisse, Errol P. (Albuquerque, NM); Land, Cecil E. (Albuquerque, NM); Snelling, Jay B. (Albuquerque, NM)

1978-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

399

NETL: Carbon Storage - Monitoring, Verification, and Accounting...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

MVA Carbon Storage Monitoring, Verification, and Accounting (MVA) Focus Area An MVA program is designed to confirm permanent storage of carbon dioxide (CO2) in geologic formations...

400

Acceptance sampling methods for sample results verification  

SciTech Connect

This report proposes a statistical sampling method for use during the sample results verification portion of the validation of data packages. In particular, this method was derived specifically for the validation of data packages for metals target analyte analysis performed under United States Environmental Protection Agency Contract Laboratory Program protocols, where sample results verification can be quite time consuming. The purpose of such a statistical method is to provide options in addition to the ``all or nothing`` options that currently exist for sample results verification. The proposed method allows the amount of data validated during the sample results verification process to be based on a balance between risks and the cost of inspection.

Jesse, C.A.

1993-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent verification contractor" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

National Energy Efficiency Evaluation, Measurement and Verification...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

National Energy Efficiency Evaluation, Measurement and Verification (EM&V) Standard: Scoping Study of Issues and Implementation Requirements Title National Energy Efficiency...

402

Compliance Verification Paths for Residential and Commercial...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Verification Paths for Residential and Commercial Energy Codes Conformity assessment is a term used to describe the processes followed to demonstrate that a product, service,...

403

National Energy Efficiency Evaluation, Measurement and Verification...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

65E ERNEST ORLANDO LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY National Energy Efficiency Evaluation, Measurement and Verification (EM&V) Standard: Scoping Study of Issues and...

404

Energy Efficiency Measurement & Verification in South Africa  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Contacts Media Contacts Energy Efficiency Measurement & Verification in South Africa Speaker(s): Xiaohua Xia Date: December 17, 2012 - 12:00pm Location: 90-3122 Seminar...

405

Formal verification in a commercial setting  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This tutorial addresses the following questions:¿ why do formal verification?¿ who is doing it today?¿ what are they doing?¿ how are they doing it?¿ what about the future?

R. P. Kurshan

1997-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

406

Radiography Facility - Building 239 Independent Validation Review  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this task was to perform an Independent Validation Review to evaluate the successful implementation and effectiveness of Safety Basis controls, including new and revised controls, to support the implementation of a new DSA/TSR for B239. This task addresses Milestone 2 of FY10 PEP 7.6.6. As the first IVR ever conducted on a LLNL nuclear facility, it was designated a pilot project. The review follows the outline developed for Milestone 1 of the PEP, which is based on the DOE Draft Guide for Performance of Independent Verification Review of Safety Basis Controls. A formal Safety Basis procedure will be developed later, based on the lessons learned with this pilot project. Note, this review is termed a ''Validation'' in order to be consistent with the PEP definition and address issues historically raised about verification mechanisms at LLNL. Validation is intended to confirm that implementing mechanisms realistically establish the ability of TSR LCO, administrative control or safety management program to accomplish its intended safety function and that the controls are being implemented. This effort should not, however, be confused with a compliance assessment against all relevant DOE requirements and national standards. Nor is it used as a vehicle to question the derivation of controls already approved by LSO unless a given TSR statement simply cannot be implemented as stated.

Altenbach, T J; Beaulieu, R A; Watson, J F; Wong, H J

2010-02-02T23:59:59.000Z

407

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 01-02: Management and Independent  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

provides the opportunity for the Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) to periodically issue clarifying guidance regarding the processes used in its enforcement activities. OE typically issues such guidance in the form of Enforcement Guidance Supplements (EGSs), which provide information or recommendations only and impose no requirements or actions on DOE contractors. DOE enforcement activities to date have indicated the need for improvement in contractor compliance with the Management and Independent Assessment (M&IA) requirements of 10 CFR 830.122. This EGS signals an increased emphasis by OE in this area, and describes the general approach that will be used by OE in evaluating compliance of nuclear-safety related M&IA Programs. EGS0102.PDF Description

408

Independent Activity Report, Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office - April 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office - Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office - April 2013 Independent Activity Report, Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office - April 2013 April 2003 Operational Awareness Oversight of the Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office (PPPO) Performance of the Contractor Assurance System Program [HIAR PORTS-2012-09-24] The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) shadowed PPPO's review of specific elements of the Fluor-B&W Portsmouth (FBP) CAS program at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PORTS). The review was limited to three requirements of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 226.1B, Implementation of Department of Energy Oversight Policy: FBP's submittal of the initial CAS to the DOE Contracting Officer for review and approval; performance of contractor assessments; and

409

Efficient formal verification of bounds of linear programs  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

One of the challenging problems in the formalization of mathematics is a formal verification of numerical computations. Many theorems rely on numerical results, the verification of which is necessary for producing complete formal proofs. The formal verification ...

Alexey Solovyev; Thomas C. Hales

2011-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

410

Hydrologic Verification: A Call for Action and Collaboration  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Traditionally, little attention has been focused on the systematic verification of operational hydrologic forecasts. This paper summarizes the results of forecast verification from 15 river basins in the United States. The verification scores for ...

Edwin Welles; Soroosh Sorooshian; Gary Carter; Billy Olsen

2007-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

411

Independent Oversight Activity Report, Hanford Tank Farms - June 2013 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oversight Activity Report, Hanford Tank Farms - June Oversight Activity Report, Hanford Tank Farms - June 2013 Independent Oversight Activity Report, Hanford Tank Farms - June 2013 June 2013 Office of River Protection Assessment of Contractor Quality Assurance, Operational Awareness at the Hanford Tank Farms [HIAR NNSS-2012-12-03] The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (Independent Oversight) Site Lead conducted an operational awareness visit to the ORP Hanford Tank Farms, observed a Tank Farms morning meeting, toured the C Tank Farm, and observed a heavy (34,000 pound) lift. Independent Oversight Activity Report, Hanford Tank Farms - June 2013 More Documents & Publications Independent Activity Report, Office of River Protection Waste Treatment

412

INDEPENDENT COST REVIEW (ICR) and INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

INDEPENDENT COST REVIEW (ICR) and INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE (ICE) Standard Operating Procedures INDEPENDENT COST REVIEW (ICR) and INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE (ICE) Standard Operating...

413

ORO Verification of Employment Tracking System(VETS) PIA, Oak...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Verification of Employment Tracking System(VETS) PIA, Oak ridge Operations Office ORO Verification of Employment Tracking System(VETS) PIA, Oak ridge Operations Office ORO...

414

The Office of Nuclear Verification | National Nuclear Security...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

at NNSA Blog The Office of Nuclear Verification Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nonproliferation > Nonproliferation & International Security > The Office of Nuclear Verification...

415

Formal verification of practical MPI programs  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper considers the problem of formal verification of MPI programs operating under a fixed test harness for safety properties without building verification models. In our approach, we directly model-check the MPI/C source code, executing its interleavings ... Keywords: distributed programming, dynamic partial order reduction, message passing interface, model checking, mpi

Anh Vo; Sarvani Vakkalanka; Michael DeLisi; Ganesh Gopalakrishnan; Robert M. Kirby; Rajeev Thakur

2009-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

416

Management of government personal property in the hands of contractors. Handbook for contracting officers and staff  

SciTech Connect

This manual is divided into three parts. Part One applies to the management of Government personal property within the Department of Energy in general terms. Part Two describes the specifics of the application of personal property management techniques to On-Site Contractors. Part three applies to Off-Site Contractors. Part One introduces the field of property management. It discusses: the legal basis and requirements established by Federal Statutes and the parallel authorities and responsibilities; the related evolution of the Department of Energy; the regulation system within the Federal Government and its implementation by the Department for personal property management. The life cycle of equipment is presented and how control over personal property is maintained through an accountability system. Classifications of property and contract clauses are discussed. The relationships of contracting officers and property administrators with contractors are presented in each of the discussions as appropriate. Part One consists of only one chapter and is applicable to the management of property utilized by all types of contractors. It provides the foundation to explore in some detail the actions and interactions that occur between the Department's procurement and property personnel and those of the contractor. This exploration in depth is made in Parts Two and Three.

Not Available

1982-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

417

On The Independence Of Digits In Connected Digit Strings  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

One of the frequently used assumptions in Speaker Verification is that two speech segments (phonemes, subwords, words) are considered to be independent. And therefore, the log-likelihood of a test utterance is just the sum of the log-likelihoods of the speech segments in that utterance. This paper reports about cases in which this observation-independence assumption seems to be violated, namely for those test utterances which call a certain speech model more than once. For example, a pin code which contains a non-unique digit set performs worse in verification than a pin code which consists of four different digits. Results illustrate that violating the independence assumption too much might result in increasing EERs while more information (in form of digits) is added to the test utterance. 1. INTRODUCTION In Speaker Verification (SV) systems using passwords in the form of fixed or prompted digit strings it seems usual to compute the log-likelihood of a claimant being the true speaker...

Johan Koolwaaij; Lou Boves

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

418

Comment submitted by the Air Conditioning, Heating and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) regarding the Energy Star Verification Testing Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AHRI Comments - DOE Verification Testing in Support of Energy Star AHRI Comments - DOE Verification Testing in Support of Energy Star May 9, 2011 P a g e | 1 May 9, 2010 Ms. Ashley Armstrong U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 RE: DOE Verification Testing in Support of Energy Star Dear Ms. Armstrong: I am writing on behalf of the Air Conditioning, Heating and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) to address the proposed DOE requirements for verification testing in support of the Energy Star program. AHRI is the trade association representing manufacturers of heating, cooling, and commercial refrigeration equipment. More than 300 members strong, AHRI is an internationally recognized advocate for the industry, and develops standards for and certifies the performance of many of the

419

National Nuclear Security Administration Contractors' Disability Compensation and Return-to-Work Programs, IG-0867  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audit Report Audit Report The National Nuclear Security Administration Contractors' Disability Compensation and Return-to-Work Programs DOE/IG-0867 June 2012 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 June 18, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "NNSA Contractors' Disability Compensation and Return-to-Work Programs" INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration is responsible for the Nation's nuclear weapons programs. NNSA relies on contractors to manage and operate the seven sites that form its nuclear security enterprise, including three national laboratories. Under

420

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Criteria and Procedures for DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Criteria and Procedures for DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program Criteria and Procedures for DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations PART 708 -- DOE CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEE PROTECTION PROGRAM Subpart A -- General Provisions Sec. 708.1--What is the purpose of this regulation? Sec. 708.2--What are the definitions of terms used in this regulation? Sec. 708.3--What employee complaints are covered? Sec. 708.4--What employee complaints are not covered? Sec. 708.5--What employee conduct is protected from retaliation by an employer? Sec. 708.6--What constitutes "a reasonable fear of serious injury?" Sec. 708.7--What must an employee do before filing a complaint based on a retaliation for refusal to participate? Sec. 708.8--Does this regulation apply to pending cases?

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent verification contractor" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Paducah DUF6 Conversion Final EIS - Appendix H: Contractor Disclosure Statement  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Paducah DUF Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS APPENDIX H: CONTRACTOR DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Disclosure Statement H-2 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Disclosure Statement H-3 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS APPENDIX H: CONTRACTOR DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) is the contractor assisting the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in preparing the environmental impact statement (EIS) for depleted UF 6 conversion. DOE is responsible for reviewing and evaluating the information and determining the appropriateness and adequacy of incorporating any data, analyses, or results in the EIS. DOE determines the scope and content of the EIS and supporting documents and will furnish direction to ANL, as appropriate, in preparing these documents. The Council on Environmental Quality's regulations (40 CFR 1506.5(c)), which have

422

Microsoft PowerPoint - FederalReporting Contractors Apr 2010 [Compatibility Mode]  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractors Contractors Contractors April 2010 Reporting Period Outline of Presentation * Basic Background on Recovery Act * OMB Reporting Requirements * Jobs Guidance * FederalReporting.gov * Available Resources 1 * Detailed Review of Reporting Template and Field by Field Guidance Overview On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, along with an Executive Order establishing the Economic Recovery Advisory Board Main Purpose: Stimulate the economy; create & retain jobs! Recovery Act Purpose * Preserve and create jobs and promote economic recovery DOE Goals * Promote energy efficiency * Deploy renewable power 2 recovery * Assist those most impacted by the recession * Spur technological advances in science and health via investment * Generate long-term economic benefits via investment

423

ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGE TO NAP-25, Management and Operating Contractor Business Meals and Light Refreshment  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

NAP-25 Admin Chg 1 1 NAP-25 Admin Chg 1 1 10-10-13 ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGE TO NAP-25, Management and Operating Contractor Business Meals and Light Refreshment Locations of Changes: Page Paragraph Changed To Every Header BOP-03.08 NAP-25 Cover Office of Acquisition &Supply Management Office of Acquisition & Project Management Cover Footer Office of Acquisition &Supply Management Office of Acquisition Management 1 1 Removed: FAR 31.205-14 and 1 1 Acquisition Letter 2005-12 Acquisition Letter 2012-05 1 3 Add: 3.a. NNSA Applicability 1 3a NNSA Service Center, NNSA Site Offices NNSA Federal personnel 1 3a And all NNSA Management and Operating (M&O) Contractors and to all NNSA Management and Operating (M&O) Contractors. Contracting Officers are responsible

424

Diverse Array of Career Resources Help EM Contractor Employees Find New Work  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 25, 2012 January 25, 2012 WASHINGTON, D.C. - More than 1,640 former Office of Environmental Manage- ment (EM) contractor employees have received career and outplacement assis- tance through a program launched by EM early last year. Under a contract with EM, Professional Services of America, Inc. (PSA) oper- ates the Contractor Transition Service Program. Its services are available to contractor employees across the EM complex, including those who worked in the $6 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Program, which largely came to a close in September 2011. In the past year, program staff contacted nearly 300 companies to request they partner with the program and connect workers with job vacancies. So far, the program has submitted almost 300 resumes from workers to potential employers. In all, program staff members have sent more than

425

Office of River Protection Women-Owned Small Business Contractor Receives  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

River Protection Women-Owned Small Business Contractor River Protection Women-Owned Small Business Contractor Receives One-Year Extension Office of River Protection Women-Owned Small Business Contractor Receives One-Year Extension December 19, 2012 - 10:33am Addthis Richland - - The Energy Department's Office of River Protection announced the contract for Advanced Technologies and Laboratories International Inc. (ATL) has been extended for a second one-year option. ATL, a women-owned small business, will continue to provide analytical services and testing work at the Hanford Site 222-S Laboratory through January 2, 2014. "ORP values ATL's performance and commitment to safety," said Ellen Mattlin, Tank Farm Programs Division Director. "DOE appreciates the technical and management capabilities demonstrated by the ATL workforce."

426

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 05-01, Contractor Investigation, Causal Analysis, and Corrective Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

23, 2005 23, 2005 MEMORANDUM FOR: DOE AND CONTRACTOR PRICE-ANDERSON AMENDMENTS ACT COORDINATORS FROM: STEPHEN M. SOHINKI DIRECTOR OFFICE OF PRICE-ANDERSON ENFORCEMENT SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 05-01: Contractor Investigation, Causal Analysis, and Corrective Actions Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedures for Enforcement, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity for the Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) to periodically issue clarifying guidance regarding the processes used in its enforcement activities. Such guidance is typically issued in the form of an Enforcement Guidance Supplement (EGS). As part of the investigation of potential nuclear safety noncompliances, OE routinely reviews the contractor's investigation of the noncompliance, the associated causal

427

DOE Selects Two Contractors for Multiple-Award Waste Disposal Contract |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Two Contractors for Multiple-Award Waste Disposal Two Contractors for Multiple-Award Waste Disposal Contract DOE Selects Two Contractors for Multiple-Award Waste Disposal Contract April 12, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Bill Taylor, 803-952-8564 Bill.Taylor@srs.gov Cincinnati - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) awarded two fixed price unit rate Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) multiple-award contracts for the permanent disposal of Low-Level Waste (LLW) and Mixed-Low Level Waste (MLLW) today to EnergySolutions, LLC and Waste Control Specialists, LLC. The goal of these contracts is to establish a vehicle that allows DOE sites to place timely, competitive and cost-effective task orders for the permanent disposal of: Class A, B, and C LLW and MLLW 11e(2) byproduct material Technology Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material

428

10 CFR 707 - Contractor Workplace Substance Abuse Program at DOE Sites |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10 CFR 707 - Contractor Workplace Substance Abuse Program at DOE 10 CFR 707 - Contractor Workplace Substance Abuse Program at DOE Sites 10 CFR 707 - Contractor Workplace Substance Abuse Program at DOE Sites 10 CFR 707, Federal Register, July 22, 1992 Amendment to 10 CFR 707, January 23, 2008 Executive Order 12564 10 CFR 707 Safety Advisory Implementation Assistance Frequently Asked Questions Implementation Dates 10 CFR 707 Public Forums - Video Conference Presentations Rulemaking Request for Information July 30, 2010 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Economic Assessment Questionnaire Policy Memorandum Secretary of Energy's Decision Memorandum Regarding Drug Testing for DOE Positions That Require Access Authorizations, September 14, 2007 Tools Department of Health and Human Services: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's web site link(Click "Federal

429

DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

its Ames Laboratory its Ames Laboratory DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate its Ames Laboratory June 29, 2006 - 2:48pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today issued its Request for Proposals (RFP) for the competitive selection of a management and operating (M&O) contractor to operate Ames Laboratory, a DOE Office of Science (SC) research facility in Ames, Iowa. This competition for a contractor is the first in the history of the laboratory. Ames is a laboratory that has been funded at approximately $30 million annually by the Office of Science, other government agencies, and private industry. "Ames Laboratory provides leadership in basic research across a broad spectrum of science, with great expertise in biology, chemistry, physics

430

Audit Report - Follow-up Audit on Term Assignments of Contractor Employees, DOE-IG-0890  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on Term on Term Assignments of Contractor Employees DOE/IG-0890 July 2013 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 July 2, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Follow-up Audit on Term Assignments of Contractor Employees" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy frequently assigns facility contractor personnel to the Washington, DC, area on a temporary basis when program officials consider it necessary to obtain technical expertise not available locally. Commonly referred to as term assignments, the estimated cost of all such assignments for Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 was over $37 million, all of which was

431

Not Your Father's Weatherization: Q&A with Contractor Mike Richart |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Not Your Father's Weatherization: Q&A with Contractor Mike Not Your Father's Weatherization: Q&A with Contractor Mike Richart Not Your Father's Weatherization: Q&A with Contractor Mike Richart June 9, 2010 - 10:05am Addthis Mike Richart's company has witnessed a surge in weatherization business in the past year | Photo courtesy of Mike Richart Mike Richart's company has witnessed a surge in weatherization business in the past year | Photo courtesy of Mike Richart Paul Lester Communications Specialist, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy What does this mean for me? This Vancouver-based small business -- Richart Family, Inc. -- has hired 25 new workers to meet the higher demand for weatherization work thanks to the Recovery Act. From improvements in technology to increased consumer demand on quality,

432

DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory July 10, 2006 - 2:57pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced the issuance of a final Request for Proposals (RFP) for the competitive selection of an approximately $1.58 billion, five-year management and operating contract for Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab). Fermilab is a major DOE Office of Science single program research facility located on 6,800 acres approximately 45 miles west of Chicago, Illinois. "Fermilab is a world leader in high energy physics, which helps the U.S.

433

Alleged Health and Wellness Benefit Irregularities by a Department Contractor, INS-L-12-03  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Health and Wellness Benefits Health and Wellness Benefits Irregularities by a Department Contractor INS-L-12-03 May 2012 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 May 21, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL ENERGY TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY From: Sandra D. Bruce Assistant Inspector General for Inspections Office of Inspector General Subject: INFORMATION: Inspection Report on "Alleged Health and Wellness Benefit Irregularities by a Department Contractor" BACKGROUND The National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), owned and operated by the Department of Energy, supports the Department's mission to advance the national, economic and energy security of the United States. NETL has 5 sites with 81 buildings and 14 major research facilities on nearly

434

Standard Measurement & Verification Plan for Lighting Equipment Retrofit or Replacement Projects  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document provides a framework for a standard Measurement and Verification (M&V) plan for lighting projects. It was developed to support cost-effective retrofits (partial and complete replacements) of lighting systems and is intended to provide a foundation for an M&V plan for a lighting retrofit utilizing a "best practice" approach, and to provide guidance to site owners, contractors, and other involved organizations on what is essential for a robust M&V plan for lighting projects. This document provides examples of appropriate elements of an M&V plan, including the calculation of expected energy savings. The standard M&V plan, as provided, also allows for consistent comparison with other similar lighting projects. Although intended for lighting retrofit applications, M&V plans developed per this framework document may also be used for other non-lighting technology retrofits and new installations.

Richman, Eric E.

2009-11-04T23:59:59.000Z

435

Subcontracting Practices at the Nevada Operations Office and Its Management and Operating Contractor, WR-B-96-07  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL SUBCONTRACTING PRACTICES AT THE NEVADA OPERATIONS OFFICE AND ITS MANAGEMENT AND OPERATING CONTRACTOR

436

Hierarchical Verification for Increasing Performance in Reliable Processors  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Dynamic verification using the checker processor introduces severe degradation in performance unless the checker is as fast as the main processor core. Without widening the checker's bandwidth, we propose an active verification management (AVM) approach ... Keywords: Active verification management, Correctness non-critically, Fault tolerance, Filter checker, Hierarchical verification, Performance

Joonhyuk Yoo; Manoj Franklin

2008-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

437

Secure position verification for wireless sensor networks in noisy channels  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Position verification in wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is quite tricky in presence of attackers (malicious sensor nodes), who try to break the verification protocol by reporting their incorrect positions (locations) during the verification stage. In ... Keywords: 3? limit, distance estimation, distributed protocol, location verification, quantiles, wireless networks

Partha Sarathi Mandal; Anil K. Ghosh

2011-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

438

Independent Oversight Activity Report, Savannah River Site Waste  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Activity Report, Savannah River Site Waste Independent Oversight Activity Report, Savannah River Site Waste Solidification Building Independent Oversight Activity Report, Savannah River Site Waste Solidification Building May 2013 Savannah River Site Waste Solidification Building Corrective Actions from the January 2013 Report on Construction Quality of Mechanical Systems Installation and Fire Protection Design [HIAR SRS-2013-5-07] Activity Description/Purpose: Review the corrective actions being implemented by the construction contractor to address Findings 1-4, 6, and 9 from a construction quality review performed by the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) (Reference 1). Meet with the SRS WSB project staff and Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS) engineers to discuss the proposed corrective actions

439

Independent Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site - April 2001 Independent Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site - April 2001 April 2001 Special Review of the Rocky Flats Closure Project Site The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Environment, Safety, and Health Oversight (EH-2), within the Office of Environment, Safety and Health, conducted an independent oversight Special Review at the Rocky Flats Closure Project (RFCP). The Special Review was conducted at the request of the Rocky Flats Field Office (RFFO), which is the DOE organizational element with responsibility for the RFCP (formerly known as the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site). Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC (KH) is the prime contractor for the RFCP. RFCP's project-oriented approach and aggressive scheduling have resulted

440

Independent Oversight Evaluation, Pantex Plant - November 2000 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Evaluation, Pantex Plant - November 2000 Evaluation, Pantex Plant - November 2000 Independent Oversight Evaluation, Pantex Plant - November 2000 November 2000 Evaluation of the Pantex Plant Emergency Response Exercise The Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (Independent Oversight) conducted an evaluation of the annual emergency response exercise "Verser Partout" at the Pantex Plant during the week of August 28, 2000. The purposes of the evaluation were to determine how effectively DOE and contractor line management at the Pantex Plant have prepared for and are capable of responding to an accident involving hazardous materials, and how effectively the exercise was planned, conducted, and self-evaluated as a means for testing the plant's emergency response capability and

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent verification contractor" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Independent Oversight Inspection, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - October  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oak Ridge National Laboratory - Oak Ridge National Laboratory - October 2008 Independent Oversight Inspection, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - October 2008 October 2008 Inspection of Emergency Management at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight inspected the emergency management program at DOE's Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) in August 2008. The inspection was performed by Independent Oversight's Office of Emergency Management Oversight. This 2008 inspection found that ORO and UT-Battelle, together with other site contractors, have implemented a comprehensive emergency management program that broadly protects site workers and the public in the event of a significant emergency at ORNL and that, with few exceptions, meets DOE

442

Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office - August 2011 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review, Oak Ridge Office - August 2011 Review, Oak Ridge Office - August 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office - August 2011 August 2011 Review of the Oak Ridge Office Oversight of the Fire Protection Program at the Oak Ridge Reservation The Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of selected aspects of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Oak Ridge Office (ORO) fire protection program. The scope of the review was to assess ORO's oversight of contractor implementation of the site fire protection program. Key elements assessed included conducting comprehensive self-assessments, fulfilling the roles and responsibilities for the authority having jurisdiction (AHJ), reviewing and

443

Independent Oversight Assessment, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Waste Treatment and Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - January 2012 Independent Oversight Assessment, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - January 2012 January 2012 Assessment of the Nuclear Safety Culture and Management of Nuclear Safety Concerns at the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent assessment at the DOE Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) to evaluate the current status of the nuclear safety culture and the effectiveness of DOE and contractor management in addressing nuclear safety concerns at WTP. This assessment provides DOE management with a follow-up on the October 2010 HSS review of the WTP

444

Independent Activity Report, Office of River Protection - April 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Activity Report, Office of River Protection - April Independent Activity Report, Office of River Protection - April 2011 Independent Activity Report, Office of River Protection - April 2011 April 2011 Hanford Tank Farms Unreviewed Safety Question Process Review [HIAR-HORP-2011-04-18] The purpose of the activity, which was performed by the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) as part of the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of River Protection's (ORP's) nuclear safety assessment and oversight, was to review and evaluate selected aspects of the Tank Farms Operating Contractor's (TOC's) implementation of the recently revised unreviewed safety question (USQ) procedure. A major aspect of the revised implemented process (Ref. 1) was to eliminate unnecessary screening and to streamline the USQ process by defining facility and procedure changes that are outside

445

Independent Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site - April 2001 Independent Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site - April 2001 April 2001 Special Review of the Rocky Flats Closure Project Site The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Environment, Safety, and Health Oversight (EH-2), within the Office of Environment, Safety and Health, conducted an independent oversight Special Review at the Rocky Flats Closure Project (RFCP). The Special Review was conducted at the request of the Rocky Flats Field Office (RFFO), which is the DOE organizational element with responsibility for the RFCP (formerly known as the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site). Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC (KH) is the prime contractor for the RFCP.

446

Independent Oversight Inspection, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - October  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oak Ridge National Laboratory - Oak Ridge National Laboratory - October 2008 Independent Oversight Inspection, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - October 2008 October 2008 Inspection of Emergency Management at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight inspected the emergency management program at DOE's Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) in August 2008. The inspection was performed by Independent Oversight's Office of Emergency Management Oversight. This 2008 inspection found that ORO and UT-Battelle, together with other site contractors, have implemented a comprehensive emergency management program that broadly protects site workers and the public in the event of a significant emergency at ORNL and that, with few exceptions, meets DOE

447

Independent Activity Report, Los Alamos National Laboratory - April 2010 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Activity Report, Los Alamos National Laboratory - April Activity Report, Los Alamos National Laboratory - April 2010 Independent Activity Report, Los Alamos National Laboratory - April 2010 April 2010 Los Alamos Site Office Assessment of Fire Protection Activities at the Los Alamos National Laboratory The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, in coordination with the Los Alamos Site Office (LASO), provided a technical expert to conduct several fire protection oversight activities, including validation of Los Alamos County's Fire Hydrant Flow Test Methodology and a review of Los Alamos National Laboratory Equivalency Request Review Process in support of LASO oversight of the contractor. Independent Activity Report, Los Alamos National Laboratory - April 2010

448

NUMERICAL VERIFICATION OF EQUILIBRIUM CHEMISTRY  

SciTech Connect

A numerical tool is in an advanced state of development to compute the equilibrium compositions of phases and their proportions in multi-component systems of importance to the nuclear industry. The resulting software is being conceived for direct integration into large multi-physics fuel performance codes, particularly for providing boundary conditions in heat and mass transport modules. However, any numerical errors produced in equilibrium chemistry computations will be propagated in subsequent heat and mass transport calculations, thus falsely predicting nuclear fuel behaviour. The necessity for a reliable method to numerically verify chemical equilibrium computations is emphasized by the requirement to handle the very large number of elements necessary to capture the entire fission product inventory. A simple, reliable and comprehensive numerical verification method is presented which can be invoked by any equilibrium chemistry solver for quality assurance purposes.

Piro, Markus [Royal Military College of Canada; Lewis, Brent [Royal Military College of Canada; Thompson, Dr. William T. [Royal Military College of Canada; Simunovic, Srdjan [ORNL; Besmann, Theodore M [ORNL

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

449

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 01-22, Management and Independent Assessment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EGS: 01-02 Appendix E- Operational Procedures for Enforcement Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 December 17, 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR: DOE PAAA COORDINATORS CONTRACTOR PAAA COORDINATORS FROM: R. KEITH CHRISTOPHER DIRECTOR OFFICE OF PRICE-ANDERSON ENFORCEMENT SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 01-02: Management and Independent Assessment Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedures for Enforcement, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity for the Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) to periodically issue clarifying guidance regarding the processes used in its enforcement activities. OE typically issues such guidance in the form of Enforcement Guidance Supplements (EGSs), which provide information or recommendations only and impose no

450

Report on Audit of Department of Energy Management and Operating Contractor Available Fees, IG-0390  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AUDIT OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY MANAGEMENT AND OPERATING CONTRACTOR AVAILABLE FEES The Office of Inspector General wants to make the distribution of its reports as customer friendly and cost effective as possible. Therefore, this report will be available electronically through the Internet five to seven days after publication at the following alternative address: Department of Energy Headquarters Gopher

451

HANFORD SITE WELDING PROGRAM SUCCESSFULLY PROVIDING A SINGLE SITE FUNCTION FOR USE BY MULTIPLE CONTRACTORS  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy, Richland Operations (DOE-RL) recently restructured its Hanford work scope, awarding two new contracts over the past several months for a total of three contracts to manage the sites cleanup efforts. DOE-RL met with key contractor personnel prior to and during contract transition to ensure site welding activities had appropriate oversight and maintained code compliance. The transition also provided an opportunity to establish a single site-wide function that would provide welding and materials engineering services to the Hanford site contractors: CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CHPRC); Mission Support Alliance (MSA); Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS); and Washington Closure Hanford (WCH). Over the years, multiple and separate welding programs (amongst the several contractors) existed at the Hanford site leading to inefficiencies resulting from duplication of administrative efforts, maintenance of welding procedures, welder performance certifications, etc. The new, single program eliminates these inefficiencies. The new program, co-managed by two of the sites' new contractors, the CHPRC ('owner' of the program and responsible for construction welding services) and the MSA (provides maintenance welding services), provides more than just the traditional construction and maintenance welding services. Also provided, are welding engineering, specialty welding development/qualification for the closure of radioactive materials containers and materials evaluation/failure analysis. The following describes the new Hanford site welding program.

CANNELL GR

2009-11-19T23:59:59.000Z

452

Audit of the Department of Energy's Contractor Liability Insurance Costs, IG-0396  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL AUDIT OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S CONTRACTOR LIABILITY INSURANCE COSTS The Office of Inspector General wants to make the distribution of its reports as customer friendly and cost effective as possible. Therefore, this report will be available electronically through the Internet five to seven days after publication at the following alternative addresses:

453

Audit of Department of Energy's Contractor Salary Increase Funds, CR-B-97-02  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL AUDIT OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S CONTRACTOR SALARY INCREASE FUND The Office of Inspector General wants to make the distribution of its reports as customer friendly and cost effective as possible. Therefore, this report will be available electronically through the Internet five to seven days after publication at the following alternative addresses:

454

jContractor: Introducing Design-by-Contract to Java Using Reflective Bytecode Instrumentation  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Design by Contract is a software engineering practice that allows semantic information to be added to a class or interface to precisely specify the conditions that are required for its correct operation. The basic constructs of Design by Contract are ... Keywords: Design by Contract, Java, bytecode instrumentation, jContractor

Murat Karaorman; Parker Abercrombie

2005-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

455

Power Quality for Electrical Contractors: Application Guide, Volume 2: Recommended Practices: Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A wide variety of sensitive electronic equipment is finding its way into new and existing buildings. To insure that this equipment functions properly, building owners and equipment users are showing more concern for their buildings' power quality. Volume 2, Focusing on Recommended Practices, of the Power Quality for Electrical Contractors Applications Guide discusses the issues involved in providing good power quality.

1999-08-17T23:59:59.000Z

456

Rev. No.: 2.0 Contractor Environmental Safety and Health Manual Title: Program policy  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Rev. No.: 2.0 Contractor Environmental Safety and Health Manual Title: Program policy 2.0/sp08d010.htm 1 (11/07) Program Policy 1.0 Purpose This procedure provides requirements for identifying key) and Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act (WISHA) standards. The provisions of this procedure apply to work

457

Current information technology needs of small to medium sized apparel manufacturers and contractors  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report documents recent efforts of the American Textile Partnership (AMTEX) Demand Activated Manufacturing Architecture (DAMA) Project to address needs that are characterized of small to medium sized apparel manufactures and contractors. Background on the AMTEX/DAMA project and objectives for this specific efforts are discussed.

Wipple, C.; Vosti, E.

1997-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

458

Proceedings of the natural gas RD&D contractors review meeting, Volume I  

SciTech Connect

This report contains papers which were presented at the natural gas contractors review meeting held on April 4-6, 1995. Topics were concerned with resource and reserves, low permeability reservoir characterization, natural fracture detection, drilling, completion, and stimulation, and natural gas upgrading. Individual papers were processed separately for the United States Department of Energy databases.

Malone, R.D.

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

459

NREL: Wind Research - Field Verification Project  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Field Verification Project Field Verification Project The mission of the Field Verification Project (FVP) was to enable U.S. industry to complete the research, testing, and field verification needed to fully develop advanced wind energy technologies that lead the world in cost-effectiveness and reliability. The project, completed in 2003, included cost-shared research with industry partners to lead to the development of advanced technology wind turbines and support for projects that verify performance of wind turbine technologies in actual operational applications. FVP provided small wind turbine (<=100 kW) manufacturers with opportunities to operate and monitor their turbines under a range of distributed power applications and environments throughout the United States. This experience helped U.S. companies validate and improve the

460

Measurement and Verification for Demand Response  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Measurement and Verification for Measurement and Verification for Demand Response Prepared for the National Forum on the National Action Plan on Demand Response: Measurement and Verification Working Group AUTHORS: Miriam L. Goldberg & G. Kennedy Agnew-DNV KEMA Energy and Sustainability National Forum of the National Action Plan on Demand Response Measurement and Verification for Demand Response was developed to fulfill part of the Implementation Proposal for The National Action Plan on Demand Response, a report to Congress jointly issued by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in June 2011. Part of that implementation proposal called for a "National Forum" on demand response to be conducted by DOE and FERC. Given that demand response has matured, DOE and FERC decided that a "virtual" project

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent verification contractor" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Measurement and Verification | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Measurement and Verification Measurement and Verification Measurement and Verification October 16, 2013 - 4:43pm Addthis Photo of a man with a clipboard and measuring tools standing in front of an open energy panel box. A National Park Service energy manager checks an energy management system at the Zion National Park Visitor Center. Measurement and verification (M&V) play a vital role in renewable energy projects. M&V verifies verify that renewable energy technologies successfully meet the energy generation or savings requirements as specified by the agency and the system design. Federal sustainable building guidelines require M&V systems for sustainable building projects and the use of M&V data for benchmarking systems. However, these systems deliver value well beyond regulatory compliance.

462

Runtime verification of object lifetime specifications  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This thesis reports on the implementation of a runtime verification system for object lifetime specifications. This system is used to explore and evaluate the expressiveness object lifetime specifications. Object lifetime ...

Benjamin, Zev (Zev A.)

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

463

Seismic design verification of LMFBR structures  

SciTech Connect

The report provides an assessment of the seismic design verification procedures currently used for nuclear power plant structures, a comparison of dynamic test methods available, and conclusions and recommendations for future LMFB structures.

1977-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

464

Automatic verification of competitive stochastic systems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

We present automatic verification techniques for the modelling and analysis of probabilistic systems that incorporate competitive behaviour. These systems are modelled as turn-based stochastic multi-player games, in which the players can either collaborate ...

Taolue Chen; Vojt?ch Forejt; Marta Kwiatkowska; David Parker; Aistis Simaitis

2012-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

465

Hierarchical layout verification for submicron designs  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In this paper we present the program HEXDRC for hierarchical circuit extraction and design rule check. The main problem for hierarchical layout verification is to handle interactions between different cells effectively. The kind of interactions however ...

W. Meier

1990-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

466

Intercomparison of Spatial Forecast Verification Methods  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Advancements in weather forecast models and their enhanced resolution have led to substantially improved and more realistic-appearing forecasts for some variables. However, traditional verification scores often indicate poor performance because ...

Eric Gilleland; David Ahijevych; Barbara G. Brown; Barbara Casati; Elizabeth E. Ebert

2009-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

467

The Severe Hazards Analysis and Verification Experiment  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

During the springs and summers of 2006 through 2008, scientists from the National Severe Storms Laboratory and students from the University of Oklahoma have conducted an enhanced severe-storm verification effort. The primary goal for the Severe ...

Kiel L. Ortega; Travis M. Smith; Kevin L. Manross; Angelyn G. Kolodziej; Kevin A. Scharfenberg; Arthur Witt; Jonathan J. Gourley

2009-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

468

A relational framework for bounded program verification  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

All software verification techniques, from theorem proving to testing, share the common goal of establishing a program's correctness with both (1) a high degree of confidence and (2) a low cost to the user, two criteria ...

Dennis, Gregory D. (Gregory David), 1980-

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

469

A General Framework for Forecast Verification  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A general framework for forecast verification based on the joint distribution of forecasts and observations is described. For further elaboration of the framework, two factorizations of the joint distribution are investigated: 1) the calibration-...

Allan H. Murphy; Robert L. Winkler

1987-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

470

Comment submitted by United Lighting, Inc. regarding the Energy Star Verification Testing Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

From: Donald C Plunkett [mailto:donplunkett@gmail.com] From: Donald C Plunkett [mailto:donplunkett@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 11:12 AM To: Certification@energystar.gov; ESTARVerificationTesting@ee.doe.gov Cc: luminaires@energystar.gov Subject: (EPA & DOE) Verification Testing Sample Size The EPA and DOE Energy Star verification testing program is an unfair trade practice that burdens small independent US manufacturers while benefiting large importing multinationals. The large multinational Energy Star Partners, independently or through manufacturing associations, expend "millions" of dollars lobbying the EPA and other government agencies (ref: Lobbying Reports via Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995) to influence Energy Star programs toward their own interests. Not to mention the DOE has

471

Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Integrated Waste Treatment Uinit Contractor Operational Readiness Review, June 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor Contractor Operational Readiness Review June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 4.0 Results ................................................................................................................................................... 2

472

Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Integrated Waste Treatment Uinit Contractor Operational Readiness Review, June 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Contractor Contractor Operational Readiness Review June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 4.0 Results ................................................................................................................................................... 2

473

Formal Verification of Safety Automation Logic Designs  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In safety critical processes, especially in nuclear power plants, the new digitalized automation (I&C) systems have brought out new needs for safety evaluation. The programmable digital logic controllers can perform complicated control tasks and, thus, their comprehensive verification against safety requirements is a difficult task. Model checking is a promising approach that enables complete verification of a logic design when a finite state machine model of the control logic is available. The paper describes the use of model checking for the verification of an arc protection system and summarizes experiences of utilizing model checking in automation design and verification. For the verification of the arc protection system, it was necessary to model the overall design of the system and its operation environment. The environment model could be kept relatively simple while covering the essential behaviour of the environment. The results show that it is possible to reliably verify the presence of a desired or the absence of an undesired behaviour of the system. The possibility of complete verification makes model checking different from simulation based testing where only selected schemes can be simulated and one can never be sure that all the possible sequences are examined.

Janne Valkonen; Matti Koskimies; Kim Björkman; Keijo Heljanko; Ilkka Niemelä; Jari J. Hämäläinen

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

474

Review of the Hanford Site CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company Implementation Verification Review Processes, November 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Review Independent Oversight Review of the Hanford Site CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company Implementation Verification Review Processes November 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope...................................................................................................................................................... 2

475

Review of the Hanford Site CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company Implementation Verification Review Processes, November 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Independent Oversight Review Independent Oversight Review of the Hanford Site CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company Implementation Verification Review Processes November 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope...................................................................................................................................................... 2

476

SPECIAL ACQUISITION REQUIREMENTS ─ TYPICAL ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH PERSONAL SERVICES AND INHERENTLY GOVERNMENTAL FUNCITONS WHEN CONTRACTORS WORK IN THE FEDERAL WORKPLACE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

-------- -------- -------------------------------- Chapter 37.114 (December 2010) 1 FEDERAL AND CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEE ROLES IN THE FEDERAL WORKPLACE: CONTRACTOR AND CONTRACTOR WORK PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION, INHERENTLY GOVERNMENTAL FUNCTIONS, PERSONAL SERVICES, AND FEDERAL INVOLVEMENT IN CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL DECISIONS References: FAR 7.5, 37.000, 37.103, 37.104, 37.114; DEAR 937; Acquisition Guide 3.1, 9.1, 37.1, 37.2, 70.7 Overview  The purpose of this guide chapter is to aid in establishing effective management controls for: o identification of contractor employees and their work product o inherently governmental functions o personal services and o Federal involvement in contractor personnel decisions

477

Completing the automated verification of a small hypervisor - assembler code verification  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In [1] the almost complete formal verification of a small hypervisor with the automated C code verifier VCC [2] was reported: the correctness of the C portions of the hypervisor and of the guest simulation was established; the verification of the assembler ...

Wolfgang Paul; Sabine Schmaltz; Andrey Shadrin

2012-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

478

External Independent Review (EIR) Report Template | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

More Documents & Publications Statement of Work (SOW) Template (Combined EIRICE Support Contractor) Microsoft Word - EIR SOP Updated 101110 frank clean EIR SOP...

479

Independent Oversight Activity Report, Hanford Waste Treatment...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

(VSL). Bechtel National, Inc. (BNI) is the contractor responsible for the design and construction of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) for the...

480

Independent Oversight Activity Report for Catholic University...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Purpose: Bechtel National, Inc. (BNI) is the contractor responsible for the design and construction of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) for the...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent verification contractor" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Independent Oversight Inspection, Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

in August and September 2006. The coordination of emergency plans and procedures among USEC and DOE contractor organizations has successfully integrated the emergency management...

482

Monitoring and verification R&D  

SciTech Connect

The 2010 Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) report outlined the Administration's approach to promoting the agenda put forward by President Obama in Prague on April 5, 2009. The NPR calls for a national monitoring and verification R&D program to meet future challenges arising from the Administration's nonproliferation, arms control and disarmament agenda. Verification of a follow-on to New START could have to address warheads and possibly components along with delivery capabilities. Deeper cuts and disarmament would need to address all of these elements along with nuclear weapon testing, nuclear material and weapon production facilities, virtual capabilities from old weapon and existing energy programs and undeclared capabilities. We only know how to address some elements of these challenges today, and the requirements may be more rigorous in the context of deeper cuts as well as disarmament. Moreover, there is a critical need for multiple options to sensitive problems and to address other challenges. There will be other verification challenges in a world of deeper cuts and disarmament, some of which we are already facing. At some point, if the reductions process is progressing, uncertainties about past nuclear materials and weapons production will have to be addressed. IAEA safeguards will need to continue to evolve to meet current and future challenges, and to take advantage of new technologies and approaches. Transparency/verification of nuclear and dual-use exports will also have to be addressed, and there will be a need to make nonproliferation measures more watertight and transparent. In this context, and recognizing we will face all of these challenges even if disarmament is not achieved, this paper will explore possible agreements and arrangements; verification challenges; gaps in monitoring and verification technologies and approaches; and the R&D required to address these gaps and other monitoring and verification challenges.

Pilat, Joseph F [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Budlong - Sylvester, Kory W [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Fearey, Bryan L [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

483

Independent Oversight Activity Report, K-West Annex Facility - June 2013 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

K-West Annex Facility - June K-West Annex Facility - June 2013 Independent Oversight Activity Report, K-West Annex Facility - June 2013 June 2013 Review of the Hanford Site K-West Annex Facility Layup Program for Construction Suspension/Delay [HIAR-Hanford-2013-06-10] Construction on the modified K-West Annex Facility was suspended by the Department of Energy in April 2013 due to budget cuts mandated by congressional budget sequestration. After construction was suspended, the Richland Operations Project Office directed the contractor to place the project in a safe, stable configuration to preserve the completed work, and to document completed work activities to support construction restart. In May 2013, the contractor completed the efforts necessary to protect and preserve the completed work at the project site. Independent Oversight

484

Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and CH2M and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance - April 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance - April 2012 April 2012 Review of Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance Conduct of Operations The purpose of this independent oversight review by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), was to observe and shadow1 a DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) assessment of its contractors at the Hanford Site. The HSS reviewer observed the implementation and effectiveness of the DOE-RL assessment of two of the contractors (CHPRC and

485

Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Richland Operations Office and CH2M Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance - April 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance - April 2012 April 2012 Review of Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance Conduct of Operations The purpose of this independent oversight review by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), was to observe and shadow1 a DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) assessment of its contractors at the Hanford Site. The HSS reviewer observed the implementation and effectiveness of the DOE-RL assessment of two of the contractors (CHPRC and

486

DOE-STD-3020-97; DOE Standard Specification for HEPA Filters Used By DOE Contractors  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

POUND POUND DOE-STD-3020-97 January 1997 Supersedes DOE NE F3-45 January 1987 DOE STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR HEPA FILTERS USED BY DOE CONTRACTORS U.S. Department of Energy FSC 6910 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. DE97000782 DOE-STD-3020-97 iii FOREWORD This Department of Energy standard supersedes DOE NE F3-45 and is approved for use by

487

FY 2008 CONTRACTOR PURCHASING BALANCED SCORECARD RESULTS DEPARTMENTAL AVERAGES BY FISCAL YEAR  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 CONTRACTOR PURCHASING BALANCED SCORECARD RESULTS 8 CONTRACTOR PURCHASING BALANCED SCORECARD RESULTS DEPARTMENTAL AVERAGES BY FISCAL YEAR FY 2008 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 National Taraets Customer Perspective Objective: Customer Satisfaction 93 9 3 Core Measure: Customer Satisfaction Rating Internal Business Perspective Objective: Effective Internal Controls 95 93 Core Measure: assessment of degree to which purchasing systems are in compliance Objective: Effective Supplier Management 8 3 8 1 Core Measure: % Delivery on-time, including Just-in-Time Objective: Use of Effective Competition 7 1 74 Core Measure: % of total dollars obligated on actions over $100,000 that were competed N/A - locally set 84 N/A - locally set 2 FY 2008 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY2006 FY 2007 FY2008 National Tarpets

488

DOE-STD-1158-2002; Self-Assessment Standard for DOE Contractor Criticality Safety Programs  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

02 02 November 2002 DOE STANDARD SELF-ASSESSMENT STANDARD FOR DOE CONTRACTOR CRITICALITY SAFETY PROGRAMS U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1158-2202 iii FOREWARD 1. This Department of Energy standard is approved for use by all DOE Components and their

489

Technical Barriers and Reasonable Price Solutions to Contractor Acceptance in the Field  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Barriers and Reasonable Barriers and Reasonable Price Solutions to Contractor Acceptance in the Field Ben Schoenbauer, Research Engineer, Center for Energy and Environment February 22, 2012 Gaps and Barriers in High Efficiency Space and Water Heating - System Optimization and Improved Installation What have we achieved so far? - This presentation will look at laboratory work used to address this gap - Risks that needed to be managed were a lack of familiarity of contractors and homeowner comfort - The major benefit of this project is high efficiency space and water heating as well as combustion safety What is left to achieve? - The highest priority issue remaining to be solved is to analyze actual installed efficiency and energy savings - We plan to continue to close this gap by doing a 20 site