Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

CONTAIN independent peer review  

SciTech Connect

The CONTAIN code was developed by Sandia National Laboratories under the sponsorship of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to provide integrated analyses of containment phenomena. It is used to predict nuclear reactor containment loads, radiological source terms, and associated physical phenomena for a range of accident conditions encompassing both design-basis and severe accidents. The code`s targeted applications include support for containment-related experimental programs, light water and advanced light water reactor plant analysis, and analytical support for resolution of specific technical issues such as direct containment heating. The NRC decided that a broad technical review of the code should be performed by technical experts to determine its overall technical adequacy. For this purpose, a six-member CONTAIN Peer Review Committee was organized and a peer review as conducted. While the review was in progress, the NRC issued a draft ``Revised Severe Accident Code Strategy`` that incorporated revised design objectives and targeted applications for the CONTAIN code. The committee continued its effort to develop findings relative to the original NRC statement of design objectives and targeted applications. However, the revised CONTAIN design objectives and targeted applications. However, the revised CONTAIN design objectives and targeted applications were considered by the Committee in assigning priorities to the Committee`s recommendations. The Committee determined some improvements are warranted and provided recommendations in five code-related areas: (1) documentation, (2) user guidance, (3) modeling capability, (4) code assessment, and (5) technical assessment.

Boyack, B.E. [Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States); Corradini, M.L. [Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (United States). Nuclear Engineering Dept.; Denning, R.S. [Battelle Memorial Inst., Columbus, OH (United States); Khatib-Rahbar, M. [Energy Research Inc., Rockville, MD (United States); Loyalka, S.K. [Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO (United States); Smith, P.N. [AEA Technology, Dorchester (United Kingdom). Winfrith Technology Center

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

2

NETL: 2010 - Independent Peer Reviews of NETL Technology Programs  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

- Independent Peer Reviews of NETL Technology Programs Advanced Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (AIGCC) Peer Review Advanced Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (AIGCC)...

3

NETL: Independent Peer Reviews of NETL Technology Programs  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Peer Reviews Peer Reviews Coal and Power Systems Independent Peer Reviews of NETL Technology Programs NETL is conducting a series of independent Peer Reviews of its Strategic Center for Coal Technology Programs in accordance with Departmental guidelines. Using a standard set of selection criteria, each technology program selects between 15 and 20 projects to be peer reviewed that represent the program's project portfolio and a significant portion of their fiscal year budget. Selected projects undergo a rigorous review during which the Principal Investigators summarize the status of their research, accomplishments, and future planned activities to an independent panel of experts. Projects are evaluated using a standard set of metrics to assess the progress of the Project Team towards achieving the Statements of Project Objectives as well as specific project milestones of the research. Following the Peer Review, NETL uses the results to guide and redirect the projects, as appropriate, underscoring NETL's commitment to funding and managing a portfolio of high-quality research.

4

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: Independent Peer Reviews  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Delivery Hydrogen Storage Hydrogen Manufacturing Fuel Cells Applications/Technology Validation Safety Codes and Standards Education Basic Research Systems Analysis Systems Integration Independent Reviews Macro-System Model U.S. Department of Energy Search help Home > Systems Integration > Independent Peer Reviews Printable Version Independent Peer Reviews DOE's Systems Integrator convenes independent technical reviews to gauge progress toward meeting specific technical targets and to provide technical information necessary for key decisions. These independent reviews are important to the program: They provide an unbiased understanding of the status of the program's technical targets based on the input of independent technical experts. This understanding is critical to program decision-making, budget

5

NETL: 2013 - Carbon Capture Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 - Independent Peer Reviews of NETL Technology Programs NETL: 2013 - Carbon Capture Peer Review Carbon Storage Peer Review During October 22 - 26, 2012, a total of 16 projects...

6

NETL: 2011 - Carbon Capture Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 - Independent Peer Reviews of NETL Technology Programs Advanced Energy Systems Peer Review Advanced Energy Systems Peer Review During April 23 - 27, 2012, a total of 16 projects...

7

Building Technologies Program: Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Program: Peer Review on Twitter Bookmark Building Technologies Program: Peer Review on Google Bookmark Building Technologies Program: Peer Review on Delicious Rank Building...

8

PEER REVIEW PROGRAM  

SciTech Connect

The Institute for Regulatory Science (RS) and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) jointly estab lished a peer-review program. As the program evolved, four types of review were established. A process for stakeholder participation in peer review eetings was also developed. While a committee established by the ASME provided oversight to the peer-review process, the RSI managed the day-to-day operations of peer review panels. In addition to the reports resulting from peer review of specific projects, several documents were prepared to facilitate the review process, all of which were widely distributed.

MOGHISSI, A ALAN; LOVE, BETTY R; STRAJA, SORIN R

2007-09-29T23:59:59.000Z

9

Peer Review Oct 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Peer Review - Sept, 2007 Design, Fabrication, and Test of a 5 kWh Flywheel Energy Storage System Utilizing a High Temperature Superconducting Magnetic Bearing - Phase III...

10

Peer Review of Standards Rulemaking  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CHARGE CHARGE The Department of Energy (DOE) conducted the peer reviews in accordance with the requirements outlined in Bulletin from OMB (Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/fy2005/m05-03.pdf). The selection of reviewers, including consideration of expertise, panel balance, conflicts of interest, and independence; employment of the peer review mechanisms (e.g., letter reviews, panels, etc.); and maintenance of transparency of the review process were in compliance with OMB guidance. DOE assembled a panel of experts to review the analysis used in the standards rulemaking process. The peer review panel consisted of seven reviewers DOE determined to be qualified to evaluate the assigned group of analyses, in accordance with the Bulletin. Each group of analyses displayed some technical diversity. Therefore, in

11

EMSL: External Peer Reviewers  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

EXTERNAL PEER REVIEWERS EXTERNAL PEER REVIEWERS Additional Information User Portal 2014 Call for Proposals 2014 Proposal Guidance 2014 Proposal Review Criteria Guidance for Letters of Intent to JGI-EMSL Collaborative Science Call Guidance for Full Proposals to JGI-EMSL Collaborative Science Call (Invited Only) 2014 Proposal Planning 2014 Proposal Summary/Extension Previous Calls External Peer Reviewers Fellowships and Awards Nufo, logo External peer reviewers are valuable contributors to EMSL's user proposals process. They provide objective evaluations of the quality of the proposals according to established review criteria, and participate on Review Panels that calibrate the proposals into a ranked order. EMSL is truly grateful to the researchers who donated their time and efforts in fiscal year 2012 to

12

Peer Review Oct 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review Oct 2006.ppt | 10/17/2006 Peer Review Oct 2006.ppt | 10/17/2006 BOEING is a trademark of Boeing Management Company. Copyright © 2004 Boeing. All rights reserved. Superconducting Flywheel Development Phil Johnson FESS Program Manager Boeing Phantom Works DOE Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review Boeing Technology | Phantom Works Superconducting Flywheel Development Peer Review Oct 2006.ppt | 2 Copyright © 2004 Boeing. All rights reserved. 50kW / 5kWh Flywheel Energy Storage System Off-Grid Demo System Objective: *Design, build and deliver a flywheel energy storage system tailored for off- grid applications utilizing a High Temperature Superconducting (HTS) Bearing Goal: *Successfully integrate the FESS system into a demonstration site One of three deployment options for the demo system, shown in relation to

13

2007 Annual Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2007 Annual Peer Review 2007 Annual Peer Review September 27, 2007 San Francisco, California Welcoming Remarks Imre Gyuk US Dept. of Energy DOE / ESS Program Overview (View .pdf) John Boyes Sandia National Laboratories PRESENTATIONS\ ECONOMICS - BENEFIT STUDIES Evaluating Value Propositions for Four Modular Electricity Storage Demonstrations in California (View .pdf) Jim Eyer (Distributed Utility Assoc.) Update on Benefit and Cost Comparison of Modular Energy Storage Technologies for Four Viable Value Propositions (View .pdf) Susan Schoenung (Longitude 122 West, Inc.) ECONOMICS - ENVIRONMENT BENEFITS STUDIES Emissions from Traditional & Flywheel Plants for Regulation Services (View .pdf) Rick Fioravanti (KEMA, Inc.) UTILITY & COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS OF ADVANCED ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS

14

Peer Review Oct 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review Sept , 2008 Peer Review Sept , 2008 Design, Fabrication, and Test of a 5 kWh Flywheel Energy Storage System Utilizing a High Temperature Superconducting Magnetic Bearing - Phase III Boeing Technology | Phantom Works Superconducting Flywheel Development 2 Copyright © 2004 Boeing. All rights reserved. Flywheel Energy Storage Systems Objective: *Design, build and deliver flywheel energy storage systems utilizing high temperature superconducting (HTS) bearings tailored for uninterruptible power systems and off-grid applications Goal: *Successfully integrate FESS into a demonstration site through cooperative agreements with DOE and contracts with Sandia National Labs Deployment of a demo system, shown in relation to diesel genset and balance of system. Over All Status:

15

NETL: 2010 - Carbon Sequestration Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Carbon Sequestration Peer Review Carbon Sequestration Peer Review During March 15 - 19, 2010, a total of 16 projects from NETL's Carbon Sequestration Program were peer reviewed....

16

MELCOR Peer Review  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

MELCOR is a fully integrated, engineering-level computer code that models the progression of severe accidents in light water reactor nuclear power plants. The newest version of MELCOR is Version 1.8.1, July 1991. MELCOR development has reached the point that the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission sponsored a broad technical review by recognized experts to determine or confirm the technical adequacy of the code for the serious and complex analyses it is expected to perform. For this purpose, an eight-member MELCOR Peer Review Committee was organized. The Committee has completed its review of the MELCOR code: the review process and findings of the MELCOR Peer Review Committee are documented in this report. The Committee has determined that recommendations in five areas are appropriate: (1) MELCOR numerics, (2) models missing from MELCOR Version 1.8.1, (3) existing MELCOR models needing revision, (4) the need for expanded MELCOR assessment, and (5) documentation.

Boyack, B.E. [Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States); Dhir, V.K. [Santa Monica, CA. (United States); Gieseke, J.A. [Battelle, Columbus, OH (United States); Haste, T.J. [AEA Technology, Winfrith (United Kingdom); Kenton, M.A. [Gabor, Kenton and Associates, Inc., Westmont, IL (United States); Khatib-Rahbar, M. [Energy Research, Inc., Rockville, MD (United States); Leonard, M.T. [Science Applications International Corp., Wolfheze (Netherlands); Viskanta, R. [Purdue Univ., Lafayette, IN (United States). Heat Transfer Lab.

1992-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

17

Peer Review Oct 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Peer Review - DOE Peer Review - Sept, 2007 Design, Fabrication, and Test of a 5 kWh Flywheel Energy Storage System Utilizing a High Temperature Superconducting Magnetic Bearing - Phase III Boeing Technology | Phantom Works Copyright © 2004 Boeing. All rights reserved. Superconducting Flywheel Development 2 Flywheel Energy Storage Systems Objective: *Design, build and deliver flywheel energy storage systems utilizing high temperature superconducting (HTS) bearings tailored for uninterruptible power systems and off-grid applications Goal: *Successfully integrate FESS into a demonstration site through cooperative agreements with DOE and contracts with Sandia National Labs Deployment of a demo system, shown in relation to diesel genset and balance of system. Status: *The 1 kWh / 3 kW test was successful

18

2010 Solar Program Peer Review Report: An Independent Evaluation of Program Activities for FY2009 and FY2010  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document summarizes the recommendations and evaluations provided by an independent external panel of experts at the DOE Solar Energy Technologies Program's 2010 Program Review meeting, held on May 24?27, 2010, in Washington, D.C.

DOE Solar Energy Technologies Program

2010-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

19

Peer Reviews | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work Plan Mission About Us...

20

Peer Review 2012 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

12 Peer Review 2012 September 30, 2012 Subject: Department of Energy, Peer Review for the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2012 Reviewer: Treasury Inspector General for Tax...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

FEMP Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Panel Report Panel Report September 20-21, 2005 FEMP PEER REVIEW PANEL Paul DeCotis, Chair New York State Energy Research and Development Authority Floyd E. Barwig Iowa Energy Center Richard S. Brent Solar Turbines, Inc. Bruce Gross Dominion Federal Corporation Kenneth L. James Pacific Gas and Electric Company Meg Matt The Matt Group Richard A. Morgan Morgan Marketing Partners Francis J. Murray, Jr. Energy/Environmental Consultant Maria Papadakis James Madison University Polly N. Shaw Consultant Susan E. Stratton Energy Center of Wisconsin James J. Winebrake, Ph.D. Rochester Institute of Technology David B. Zabetakis David B. Zabetakis, LLC November 4, 2005 Mr. Rick Khan, Program Manager Federal Energy Management Program U.S. Department of Energy

22

NETL: 2011 - Carbon Capture Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Carbon Capture Peer Review During July 18 - 21, 2011, a total of 16 projects from NETL's Innovations for Existing Plants and Carbon Sequestration Programs were peer reviewed....

23

ORISE: Scientific Peer Review Planning  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Planning Planning Woman participating in a peer review The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) begins the peer review planning process by analyzing the purpose of the funds to be distributed. Because each agency's needs are different, ORISE then designs and manages a flexible, scientific peer review process that can be modified based on a sponsor's regulatory, policy and operational requirements. ORISE's existing tools and systems, and knowledge of reviewing proposals from a government agency perspective, are helping to promote the quality and credibility of scientific information and funded research. ORISE's peer review planning process ensures each objective review is completed on schedule, within budget and with a high degree of process integrity.

24

Published Peer Reviews | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Published Peer Reviews Published Peer Reviews Published Peer Reviews Peer Review Agenda Vehicle Technologies Annual Merit Review Effects of Intermediate Ethanol Blends on Legacy Vehicles and Small Non-Road Engines, Report 1 (pdf) Peer Review Plan for influential scientific assessment entitled, "Effects of Intermediate Ethanol Blends on Legacy Vehicles and Small Non-Road Engines, Report 1." (pdf) Peer Review Plan for Highly Influential Scientific Assessment entitled, "Climate Models: An Assessment of Strengths and Limitations for User Applications" (pdf) Peer Review Plan for Highly Influential Scientific Assessment entitled, "Synthesis and Assessment Report on Scenarios of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations and Review of Integrated Scenario

25

Peer Reviews | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to focus additional resources. Peer Reviews are intended to meet the requirements of DOE Order 413.3B, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets,...

26

Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Rulemaking Rulemaking Peer Review Report - Supporting Documentation Submitted Pursuant to the Office of Management and Budget's "Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" U.S. Department of Energy March 2007 Table of Contents PROJECT ABSTRACTS ................................................................................................... 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS ............................................................................................ 16 SLIDE PRESENTATIONS ON JUNE 28 & 29, 2005 .................................................. 104 PEER REVIEWER EVALUATION FORM.................................................................. 201 PEER REVIEW AGENDA JUNE 28 & 29, 2005 .........................................................

27

Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

04 OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review INTRODUCTION This Bulletin establishes that important scientific information shall be peer...

28

Independent peer review panel report on the integrated nonthermal treatment systems study and the comparison of integrated thermal and integrated nonthermal treatment systems for mixed low level waste  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy`s (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) Office of Science and Technology (OST) has conducted studies of integrated thermal treatment systems and integrated nonthermal treatment systems (INTS) for treating contact handled, alpha and non-alpha mixed low level radioactive waste (MLLW). The MLLW in the DOE complex consists of a wide variety of organic and inorganic solids and liquids contaminated with radioactive substances. Treatment systems are needed to destroy organic material and stabilize residues prior to land disposal. In May 1996 the Deputy Assistant Secretary for OST appointed an Independent Peer Review Panel to: (1) review and comment on the INTS Study; (2) make recommendations on the most promising thermal and nonthermal treatment systems; (3) make recommendations on research and development necessary to prove the performance of nonthermal and thermal technologies; and (4) review and comment on the preliminary draft of the ITTS/INTS Comparison Report. This report presents the primary conclusions and recommendations based on the review of the INTS study and the comparison report. System selection, overviews, comparisons, cost estimations and sensitivity analyses, and recommended R and D engineering needs are then described and discussed.

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

29

Peer Reviews | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Reviews Peer Reviews Peer Reviews SMART GRID PROGRAM 2012 Agenda and Presentations, San Diego, CA, June 7-8, 2012 2010 Agenda and Presentations, Denver, CO, November 2-4, 2010 2008 Renewable and Distributed Systems Integration Agenda, Red Bank, NJ, October 29-30, 2008 TRANSMISSION RELIABILITY 2013 Reliability & Markets Agenda and Presentations, Ithaca, NY, August 6-7, 2013 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Agenda and Presentations, Washington, DC, June 27-28, 2013 2012 Load as a Resource Agenda and Presentations, Washington, DC, September 20, 2012 2012 Reliability & Markets Agenda and Presentations, Ithaca, NY, August 7-8, 2012 2012 Advanced Applications Agenda and Presentations, Washington, DC, June 12-13, 2012 2010 Agenda and Presentations, and Final Report, Alexandria, VA,

30

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems...

31

Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review Final Information Quality...

32

Peer Review of the ASCEM Program 2010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

emdoe.gov emdoe.gov Advanced Simulation Capability for Environmental Management (ASCEM) Independent Peer Review and Assessment Team Report Technology Innovation and Development Office of Environmental Management U.S. Department of Energy September 15, 2010 Table of Contents Transmission Memorandum . . . . . . . . 1 ASCEM IPRA Team . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Findings and Observations . . . . . . . . . 5 Appendices 1: Agenda . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2: Biographical Information . . . . . 8 3: ASCEM IPRA CHARTER . . . . . 10 4: Conflict of Interest Form . . . . . 16 i Intentional Blank Page

33

An algorithm to determine peer-reviewers  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The peer-review process is the most widely accepted certification mechanism for officially accepting the written results of researchers within the scientific community. An essential component of peer-review is the identification of competent referees ... Keywords: co-authorship networks, peer-review process

Marko A. Rodriguez; Johan Bollen

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

34

PAE Evaluation Portfolio Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report from the Peer Review Panel Report from the Peer Review Panel on activities within the Planning, Analysis and Evaluation Unit Office of Planning, Budget and Analysis Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy Team Members: Kathryn Newcomer, The George Washington University (Chair) Irwin Feller, The Pennsylvania State University (Retired) Stephanie Shipman, Government Accountability Office Kathleen Sedlak O'Brien, Environmental Protection Agency Faith Lambert, EERE Final Report February 1, 2008 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) within the U.S. Department of Energy asked a panel of experts with relevant knowledge to review the evaluation activities of the Planning, Analysis and Evaluation Unit (PAE) within EERE's Office of Planning, Budget and

35

EERE Peer Review Guide - August 2004  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PEER REVIEW GUIDE PEER REVIEW GUIDE Based on a Survey of Best Practices for In-Progress Peer Review Prepared by the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Peer Review Task Force August 2004 EERE PEER REVIEW GUIDE Acknowledgements DOE/EERE, and the Peer Review Task Force particularly, acknowledge the generous and important contributions to this Guide of Review Panel Chairman Ronald N. Kostoff, Office of Naval Research, and expert panel members and reviewers: Greg Stover, NASA; Paul Doremus, NIST; Richard Silberglitt, Rand; Kerry L. Dearfield, EPA; Jim Cassatt, NIH; Daryl Chubin, NACME; Fiona Wood, Australia; Frans van den Beemt, Netherlands; Larry James, DOE; and David Tratt, NASA. Notice This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States

36

PWR GASIFIER PEER REVIEW FINAL REPORT  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PWR GASIFIER PEER REVIEW REPORT 22106 Background Pratt and Whitney Rocketdyne (PWR) signed a cooperative agreement with DOE on 93004 to develop a novel gasifier concept, which...

37

Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 14, 2010 FY10-42 OAK RIDGE, Tenn.-Oak Ridge Associated Universities has appointed Tony Lester as director of the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education's program focused on scientific peer review. Lester has been serving in this role in an acting capacity since September 2009. Tony Lester Tony Lester In his role, Lester manages a research peer review capability that coordinates the use of independent, expert reviewers to determine the scientific technical feasibility of proposals submitted in response to government agency research needs. His team works closely with the federal government to provide liaison, consultation and operations support during the planning and execution of customers' grant management cycles. The

38

Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Conservation Standards Rulemaking Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report Prepared Pursuant to the Office of Management and Budget's "Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" U.S. Department of Energy February 2007 Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................... 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 4 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 6 2. PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE ...................................................................................... 6 3. SCOPE ........................................................................................................................... 7

39

Convergent contemporary software peer review practices  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Software peer review is practiced on a diverse set of software projects that have drastically different settings, cultures, incentive systems, and time pressures. In an effort to characterize and understand these differences we examine two Google-led ... Keywords: Empirical Software Engineering, Inspection, Open source software, Peer code review, Software firms

Peter C. Rigby; Christian Bird

2013-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

40

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Smart Grid 2010 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Smart Grid 2010 Peer Review Smart Grid 2010 Peer Review The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The...

42

Smart Grid 2010 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2010 Peer Review Smart Grid 2010 Peer Review The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum...

43

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Home Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): National Lab Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...

44

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): University Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): University...

45

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Economics Presentations...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Economics Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Economics Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September...

46

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Presentations Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Presentations The 2008 Peer Review Meeting for the...

47

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronic...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

& Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronics (PE) Systems Presentations Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronics (PE) Systems...

48

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Agenda...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AgendaPresentation List Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - AgendaPresentation List The 2008 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage and Power...

49

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) PEER Review FY08 DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National...

50

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review FY07 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Mission Mission Develop advanced electricity storage...

51

2012 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available 2012 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available December 3, 2012 - 1:26pm Addthis...

52

Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available December 3, 2012 - 1:26pm Addthis...

53

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

These reports summarize the comments of expert peer reviewers at the Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, where each year projects funded by DOE's Hydrogen and Fuel Cells...

54

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Afternoon Presentations ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Afternoon Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Afternoon Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 -...

55

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Afternoon Presentations ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Afternoon Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Afternoon Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 -...

56

Microsoft Word - PeerReview_SAR.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

a Peer Review of a "Synthesis and Assessment Report on a Peer Review of a "Synthesis and Assessment Report on Scenarios of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations and Review of Integrated Scenario Development and Application" Pursuant to Section V of the "Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), under the authority of the Information Quality Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-554), the U.S. Climate Change Science Program (CCSP) announces a plan for a peer review of its Synthesis and Assessment Report 2.1 entitled "Scenarios of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations and Review of Integrated Scenario Development and Application" The CCSP (see http://www.climatescience.gov for details) integrates federal

57

PWR GASIFIER PEER REVIEW FINAL REPORT  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PWR GASIFIER PEER REVIEW REPORT PWR GASIFIER PEER REVIEW REPORT 2/21/06 Background Pratt and Whitney Rocketdyne (PWR) signed a cooperative agreement with DOE on 9/30/04 to develop a novel gasifier concept, which is expected to improve the availability and efficiency of gasification-based power plants, and to reduce plant capital and operations costs. On 12/21/05, PWR submitted a proposal to continue development of their gasifier into the next phase. On January 24, 2006, a peer review was performed to review the work that PWR has done to date, their technical approach for future development, and to assess the potential benefit of the PWR gasifier and feed system technologies over state-of-the art coal gasification. The peer reviewers also evaluated a DOE analysis of the PWR refractory, and a DOE system study comparing the

58

Independent technical review, handbook  

SciTech Connect

Purpose Provide an independent engineering review of the major projects being funded by the Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management. The independent engineering review will address questions of whether the engineering practice is sufficiently developed to a point where a major project can be executed without significant technical problems. The independent review will focus on questions related to: (1) Adequacy of development of the technical base of understanding; (2) Status of development and availability of technology among the various alternatives; (3) Status and availability of the industrial infrastructure to support project design, equipment fabrication, facility construction, and process and program/project operation; (4) Adequacy of the design effort to provide a sound foundation to support execution of project; (5) Ability of the organization to fully integrate the system, and direct, manage, and control the execution of a complex major project.

Not Available

1994-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

59

Microsoft Word - PeerReview_CCSP.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the Peer Review of the U.S. Climate Change Science Program the Peer Review of the U.S. Climate Change Science Program Synthesis and Assessment Report entitled 'Climate Models: An Assessment of Strengths and Limitations for User Applications' Pursuant to Section V of the "Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), under the authority of the Information Quality Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-554), the U.S. Climate Change Science Program (CCSP) announces a plan for the peer review of its Synthesis and Assessment Report entitled 'Climate Models: An Assessment of Strengths and Limitations for User Applications'. The CCSP is an interagency research, planning, and coordinating entity that integrates federal research on climate and global change, as sponsored by thirteen federal agencies and overseen by the Office of Science and Technology

60

Energy Storage Systems 2005 Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on October 20, 2005 in San Francisco, CA. The agenda and ESS program overview presentation are below.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Position paper - peer review and design verification of selected activities  

SciTech Connect

Position Paper to develop and document a position on the performance of independent peer reviews on selected design and analysis components of the Title I (preliminary) and Title II (detailed) design phases of the Multi-Function Waste Tank Facility project.

Stine, M.D.

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

62

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Power Electronics Presentati...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Power Electronics Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Power Electronics Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer...

63

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Peer Review 6 Peer Review Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. The agenda and ESS program overview are available below. Day 1 morning session presentations Day 1 afternoon session presentations Day 2 morning session presentations Day 2 afternoon session presentations ESS 2006 Peer Review - Agenda.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - ESS Program Overview - John Boyes, SNL.pdf More Documents & Publications Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Innovations in ESS Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications

64

Jeffrey F. Kelly Peer-Reviewed Publications  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1 Jeffrey F. Kelly Peer-Reviewed Publications 23 August 2013 Oklahoma Biological Survey, ES Bridge and WF Frick. In Review. Energetics of and Abundant Aerial Insectivore: The Purple Martin aeroecology: exploring the movements of aerial fauna through radio-wave remote sensing. Biology Letters 8: 698

Kelly, Jeff

65

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 Peer Review 7 Peer Review Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. The agenda and ESS program overview presentation are below. Presentation categories Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies Utility & Commercial Applications of Advanced Energy Storage Systems International Energy Storage Programs Power Electronics Innovations in Energy Storage Systems ESS 2007 Peer Review - Agenda.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - Program Overview - John Boyes, SNL.pdf More Documents & Publications Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Agenda/Presentation List Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - International Energy Storage

66

2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Full Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Full Presentations Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Full Presentations 2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Full Presentations The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 11 presentations over 2 days on August 7 - 8, 2012 at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY. The full presentations are available below. Presentation summaries are also available. 2012 R&M Peer Review - Transmission Investment Assessment Under Uncertainty - Ben Hobbs 2012 R&M Peer Review - Renewable Integration Through Risk-Limiting Dispatch - Pravin Varaiya 2012 R&M Peer Review - Development and Testing of New Tools - Ray Zimmerman 2012 R&M Peer Review - Commercialization of the SuperOPF Framework - Hsiao-Dong Chiang 2012 R&M Peer Review - Essence of Structure Preserving Network Reductions -

67

Energy Storage Systems 2009 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09 Peer Review 09 Peer Review Energy Storage Systems 2009 Peer Review The DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted an annual peer review in Seattle, WA on October 8, 2009. The 1-day conference included welcoming remarks from OE's Imre Gyuk as well as a program overview from John Boyes of Sandia National Laboratories and 11 presentations on individual projects. The agenda, program overview, and project presentations are available below. ESS 2009 Peer Review - Agenda.pdf ESS 2009 Peer Review - DOE-ESS Overview - John Boyes, SNL.pdf ESS 2009 Peer Review - Long Island Bus NaS Battery Energy Storage Project - Steve Eckroad, EPRI.pdf ESS 2009 Peer Review - Development of an Integrated Power Controller Based on HT SOI and SiC - Joseph Henfling, SNL.pdf ESS 2009 Peer Review - Large Format Carbon Enhanced VRLA Battery Test

68

Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

04 04 OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review INTRODUCTION This Bulletin establishes that important scientific information shall be peer reviewed by qualified specialists before it is disseminated by the federal government. We published a proposed Bulletin on September 15, 2003. Based on public comments, we published a revised proposal for additional comment on April 28, 2004. We are now finalizing the April version, with minor revisions responsive to the public's comments. The purpose of the Bulletin is to enhance the quality and credibility of the government's scientific information. We recognize that different types of peer review are appropriate for different types of information. Under this Bulletin, agencies are granted broad

69

INDEPENDENT COST REVIEW (ICR)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

COST REVIEW (ICR) COST REVIEW (ICR) and INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE (ICE) STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) Revision 1 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) OFFICE OF ACQUISITION AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT (OAPM) September 2013 SUMMARY OF UPDATES: This revision includes the following significant changes since the December 2011 SOP release: 1. The original SOP discussed how an EIR and an ICE could be executed in tandem, but since we are no longer advocating this approach the ICE process has been completely separated from the EIR process and references to EIRs have been removed. 2. Section 1 adds a reference to Public Law 2055 reflecting that we must now, as a matter of law, perform an ICE at CD-3 for projects with a TPC over $100 million. 3. Section 2 notes that DOE Programs must now pay for ICRs and ICEs and reflects that PARS II must be

70

INDEPENDENT COST REVIEW (ICR)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

COST REVIEW (ICR) COST REVIEW (ICR) and INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE (ICE) STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) Revision 1 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) OFFICE OF ACQUISITION AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT (OAPM) September 2013 SUMMARY OF UPDATES: This revision includes the following significant changes since the December 2011 SOP release: 1. The original SOP discussed how an EIR and an ICE could be executed in tandem, but since we are no longer advocating this approach the ICE process has been completely separated from the EIR process and references to EIRs have been removed. 2. Section 1 adds a reference to Public Law 2055 reflecting that we must now, as a matter of law, perform an ICE at CD-3 for projects with a TPC over $100 million. 3. Section 2 notes that DOE Programs must now pay for ICRs and ICEs and reflects that PARS II must be

71

INDEPENDENT COST REVIEW (ICR) and INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

INDEPENDENT COST REVIEW (ICR) and INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE (ICE) Standard Operating Procedures INDEPENDENT COST REVIEW (ICR) and INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE (ICE) Standard Operating...

72

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 afternoon presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 afternoon Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 afternoon presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 afternoon presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. Presentations from the Day 1 afternoon session are below. ESS 2006 Peer Review - Laboratory Scale FACTS Conroller Development - Mariesa Crow, U Missouri, Rolla.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - 100kW Low Cost Energy Storage Inverter - Larry Rinehart, Rinehart Motions.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - ETO Light Power Converter for FACTS & Energy Storage Applications - Alex Huang, NCSU.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - High-Efficiency Compact SiC-based Power Converter

73

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon 6 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. Presentations from the Day 2 afternoon session are below. ESS 2006 Peer Review - Energy Storage and Wyoming Wind Power - Mindi Farber de Anda, SAIC.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Hybrid Generation Simulator - David Trujillo, SNL.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Modular Energy Storage Benefit and Cost for Three Emerging Value Propositions - Susan Schoenung, Longitude 122 West.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - What's New - Sprint - Kevin Kenny.pdf

74

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Peer Review - Day 2 morning 6 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. Presentations from the Day 2 morning session are below. ESS 2006 Peer Review - EESAT 2007 Conference Information - Georgianne Peek, SNL.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Ultracapacitor EnergyBridge UPS - Chris McKay, Northern Power.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Flywheel-based Frequency Regulation Demonstration Projects - Jim Arseneaux, Beacon Power.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Design of the FESS 20MW Frequency Regulation Plant -

75

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review 2 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review The Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review included seven sessions over 2 days on June 12 - 13, 2012. Presentations are available through the individual session links. The agenda and participant list are available below. Presentations June 12 - Day 1: Session I, Session II, Session III, Session IV, Session V June 13 - Day 2: Session VI, Session VII 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Agenda 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Participant List More Documents & Publications 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 2

76

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronic...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Converters - Marcelo Schupbach, APEI.pdf ESPE 2008 Peer Review - High-Efficiency Compact SiC-Based Power Converter System - Timothy Lin, Aegis.pdf ESPE 2008 Peer Review - SiC Power...

77

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 afternoon presentation...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Applications - Alex Huang, NCSU.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - High-Efficiency Compact SiC-based Power Converter System - Timothy Lin, Aegis.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Optically...

78

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

United Silicon Carbide ESS 2012 Peer Review - 15 kV Phase Leg Power Modules with SiC Devices - Ranbir Singh, GeneSiC Semiconductor ESS 2012 Peer Review - Experimental...

79

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 2 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 2 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage...

80

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 1 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 1 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Day 1, Session 1 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 1 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update...

82

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports on Facebook Tweet about...

83

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Morning Presentations | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4,...

84

How important tasks are performed: peer review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The advancement of various fields of science depends on the actions of individual scientists via the peer review process. The referees' work patterns and stochastic nature of decision making both relate to the particular features of refereeing and to the universal aspects of human behavior. Here, we show that the time a referee takes to write a report on a scientific manuscript depends on the final verdict. The data is compared to a model, where the review takes place in an ongoing competition of completing an important composite task with a large number of concurrent ones - a Deadline -effect. In peer review human decision making and task completion combine both long-range predictability and stochastic variation due to a large degree of ever-changing external "friction".

Hartonen, T; 10.1038/srep01679

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

85

2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Presentation Summaries |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review - Presentation Summaries Review - Presentation Summaries 2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Presentation Summaries The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 11 presentations over 2 days on August 7 - 8, 2012 at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY. Presentation summaries are available below. The full presentations are also available. 2012 R&M Peer Review - Summary: Transmission Investment Under Uncertainty - Ben Hobbs 2012 R&M Peer Review - Summary: Renewable Integration Through Risk-Limiting Dispatch - Pravin Varaiya 2012 R&M Peer Review - Summary: Development and Testing of New Tools - Ray Zimmerman 2012 R&M Peer Review - Summary: Commercialization of the SuperOPF Framework - Hsiao-Dong Chiang 2012 R&M Peer Review - Summary: Essence of Structure Preserving Network

86

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 afternoon 2 afternoon presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. Presentations from the Day 2 afternoon session are below. ESS 2006 Peer Review - Energy Storage and Wyoming Wind Power - Mindi Farber de Anda, SAIC.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Hybrid Generation Simulator - David Trujillo, SNL.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Modular Energy Storage Benefit and Cost for Three Emerging Value Propositions - Susan Schoenung, Longitude 122 West.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - What's New - Sprint - Kevin Kenny.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - What's New - Emerson Network Power - Paul Misar.pdf

87

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 morning presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 morning 1 morning presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 morning presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. Presentations from the Day 1 morning session are below. ESS 2006 Peer Review - NAS Battery Performance at Charleston, WV - Ali Nourai, AEP.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Evaluation of the Kauai Island Utility Cooperative System for Energy Storage Potential - Abbas Akhil, SNL.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Iowa Stored Energy Plant - Bob Haug, ISEPA.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Superconducting Flywheel Development - Phil Johnson, Boeing.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Bipolar NiMH Battery Development and Testing - James

88

ORAU: Scientific and Technical Peer Review Services fact sheet  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

to ensure timely and fair assessments for informed funding decisions. Scientific and Technical Peer Review Services Unmatched Access to Scientific and Technical Reviewers ORAU is...

89

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): ARPA-E Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): ARPA-E Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. ARPA-E project presentations from the first poster session on Day 1, chaired by DOE's Mark Johnson, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Dispatchable Wind--Wind Power on Demand - Ian Lawson, General Compression ESS 2012 Peer Review - Novel Regenerative Fuel Cells based on Anion Exchange Membranes - Katherine Ayers, Proton Onsite ESS 2012 Peer Review - Low Cost, High-Energy Density Flywheel Storage Grid

90

2012 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations 2 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available 2012 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available December 3, 2012 - 1:26pm Addthis Presentations from two peer reviews in September are now available. The Consortium for Electric Reliability Technology Solutions (CERTS) Transmission Reliability R&D Load as a Resource (LAAR) Program peer review included five presentations on September 20, 2012, hosted by DOE at the Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. DOE's Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on September 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included nine sessions and two poster sessions. Addthis Related Articles 2013 Transmission Reliability R&D Peer Review Presentations Available

91

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 1 Morning Session |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Morning Session Morning Session 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 1 Morning Session The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from the Day 1 morning session are below. Moderator: Dan Ton, DOE 2012 SG Peer Review - Smart Inverter Controls and Microgrid Interoperation at DECC - Tom Rizy, ORNL 2012 SG Peer Review - CERTS Microgrid Test Bed - Joe Eto, LBNL 2012 SG Peer Review - Energy Surety, Microgrids - Mike Hightower, SNL 2012 SG Peer Review - Smart Grid Standards and Conformance Testing - Tom Basso, NREL 2012 SG Peer Review - GridLAB-D and Integrated T&D Control - David Chassin,

92

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Morning Session |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Morning Session Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Morning Session 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Morning Session The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from Day 2 morning session are below. Moderator: Merrill Smith, DOE 2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: Pacific Northwest Smart Grid Demonstration Project - Ron Melton, Battelle Memorial Institute 2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: LADWP Smart Grid Regional Demonstration Project - Mukhlesur Bhuiyan, City of Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power 2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: AEP Ohio gridSMART Demonstration

93

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ARRA Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer...

94

Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review A consensus peer review of the current technical basis and the planned experimental and modeling program for the prediction of the long-term performance of waste package materials being considered for use in a proposed repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review A Compilation of Special Topic Reports Wastepackagematerials_PPRP_final.pdf Evaluation of the Final Report: Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review Panel Multi-Purpose_Canister_System_Evaluation.pdf More Documents & Publications Preliminary Report on Dual-Purpose Canister Disposal Alternatives (FY13) A Review of Stress Corrosion Cracking/Fatigue Modeling for Light Water

95

Commercial Lighting Solutions, Webtool Peer Review Report  

SciTech Connect

The Commercial Lighting Solutions (CLS) project directly supports the U.S. Department of Energys Commercial Building Energy Alliance efforts to design high performance buildings. CLS creates energy efficient best practice lighting designs for widespread use, and they are made available to users via an interactive webtool that both educates and guides the end user through the application of the Lighting Solutions. This report summarizes the peer review of the beta version of the CLS webtool, which contains retail box lighting solutions. The methodology for the peer review process included data collection (stakeholder input), analysis of the comments, and organization of the input into categories for prioritization of the comments against a set of criteria. Based on this process, recommendations were developed about which feedback should be addressed for the release of version 1.0 of the webtool at the Lightfair conference in New York City in May 2009. Due to the volume of data (~500 comments) the methodology for addressing the peer review comments was central to the success of the ultimate goal of improving the tool. The comments were first imported into a master spreadsheet, and then grouped and organized in several layers. Solutions to each comment were then rated by importance and feasibility to determine the practicality of resolving the concerns of the commenter in the short-term or long-term. The rating system was used as an analytical tool, but the results were viewed thoughtfully to ensure that they were not the sole the factor in determining which comments were recommended for near-term resolution. The report provides a list of the top ten most significant and relevant improvements that will be made within the webtool for version 1.0 as well as appendices containing the short-term priorities in additional detail. Peer review comments that are considered high priority by the reviewers and the CLS team but cannot be completed for Version 1.0 are listed as long-term recommendations.

Jones, Carol C.; Meyer, Tracy A.

2009-06-17T23:59:59.000Z

96

Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project Transportation - September 2000 Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project Transportation -...

97

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): University Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): University Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. University project presentations from the second poster session on Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Georgianne Huff, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Strategies for Liquid-Anode Alkali Batteries of High Energy Density Operating at 0 to 100 C - C Austen Angell, AZ State ESS 2012 Peer Review - Iron Based Flow Batteries for Low Cost Grid Level Energy Storage - Jesse Wainright, Case Western Reserve

98

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects 2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. ARRA project presentations from the second poster session on Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Georgianne Huff, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - 20 MW Flywheel Frequency Regulation Plant - Jim Arseneaux, Beacon Power ESS 2012 Peer Review - Advanced Implementation of Community ESS for Grid Support - Haukur Asgeirsson, Detroit Edison ESS 2012 Peer Review - Notrees Wind Storage - Jeff Gates, Duke Energy ESS 2012 Peer Review - Compressed Air Energy Storage - Robert Booth,

99

2012 Peer Reviews in June and July | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Reviews in June and July Peer Reviews in June and July 2012 Peer Reviews in June and July June 12, 2012 - 9:31am Addthis The Department of Energy will hold peer reviews for the Real Time Reliability Management program and the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems (CEDS) program this summer. Peer reviews are an opportunity for energy sector stakeholders to hear updates on ongoing and upcoming projects, provide feedback to program managers, and network with experts from industry, academia, and national laboratories. June 12-13, 2012: Real Time Reliability Management (RTGRM) The Transmission Reliability R&D Program will conduct a peer review of the Real Time Grid Reliability Management RTGRM is part of DOE's Transmission Reliability R&D Program and includes projects in support of the North

100

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 1 Afternoon Session |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Afternoon Session 1 Afternoon Session 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 1 Afternoon Session The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from Day 1 afternoon sessions are below. Moderators: Eric Lightner and Merrill Smith 2012 SG Peer Review - GridWise Architecture Council - Ron Melton, PNNL 2012 SG Peer Review - Expanded Demand Response Functionality - Graham Parker, PNNL 2012 SG Peer Review - Integrated Smart Distribution RD&D Project - Mani Venkata, Alstom 2012 SG Peer Review - Enhanced DMS Capabilities Supporting Distribution Network DER - Tristan Glenwright, Boeing

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial 7 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. Eighteen presentations were divided into categories; those related to utility, commercial, and rail applications of advanced energy storage systems are below. Other presentation categories were: Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies International Energy Storage Programs Power Electronics Innovations in Energy Storage Systems ESS 2007 Peer Review - Application of Large-Scale ESS in AEP - Ali Nourai, AEP.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - Iowa Stored Energy Park - Kent Holst, ISEP.pdf

102

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review included seven sessions over 2 days on June 12 - 13, 2012. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through V) are available below. Session I: Dan Trudnowski, Ning Zhou, Mani Venkatasubramanian Session II: Brett Amidan, Bharat Bhargava, Ning Zhou Session III: Ken Martin, Mani Venkatasubramanian Session IV: Jeff Dagle, Jim Dyer, Joe Gracia, Joe Eto Session V: Joe Eto 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Measurement-Based Stability Assessment - Dan Trudnowski, U Montana 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Mode Meter Development - Ning

103

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations 2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations 2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 6 sessions over 2 days on August 6 - 7, 2013. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through IV) are available below. Session I: Ben Hobbs (Johns Hopkins), Kameshwar Poolla (UC Berkeley) Session II: Ray Zimmerman (Cornell), Hsiao-Dong Chiang (Cornell) Session III: Shmuel Oren (UC Berkeley), Dan Tylavsky (U Arizona), Tom Overbye (U Illinois) Session IV: Lindsay Anderson (Cornell), HyungSeon Oh (Cornell) 2013 R&M Peer Review - Assessing Transmission Investments Under Uncertainty - Ben Hobbs, Johns Hopkins 2013 R&M Peer Review - Coordinated Aggregation of Distributed Energy

104

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Poster Poster Session 2 (Day 2): SBIR Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): SBIR Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. SBIR project presentations from the second poster session on Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Georgianne Huff, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Higher Power Motor for ARPA-E Flywheel - Jim Arseneaux, Beacon Power ESS 2012 Peer Review - Acid Based Blend Membranes for Redox Flow Batteries - Alan Cisar, Lynntech ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Membrane - David Ofer, Tiax ESS 2012 Peer Review - Sodium Intercalation Battery for Stationary Storage

105

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Presentations 2 Presentations 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations The Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review included seven sessions over 2 days on June 12 - 13, 2012. Presentations from Day 2 (Sessions VI and VII) are available below. Session VI: Yuri Makarov, Henry Huang, Jim McCalley Session VII: Carlos Martinez, Pete Sauer, Gil Tam 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Real-Time Wide-Area Montoring Tool Based on CELL Method - Yuri Makarov, PNNL 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Modal Analysis for Grid Operations (MANGO) - Henry Huang, PNNL 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - New Security Tools for Real-Time Operations - Jim McCalley, Iowa State 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Automatic Reliability Reports

106

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 (Day 1): National Lab Projects 1 (Day 1): National Lab Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): National Lab Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. National lab project presentations from the first poster session on Day 1, chaired by DOE's Mark Johnson, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Metrics for Storage and Pre-Standards Analyses - David Rose, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Oahu Energy Storage Study - Michael Kintner-Meyer, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Modeling - Soowhan Kim, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Engineered Gate Oxides for Wide Bandgap Semiconductor MOSFETs - Jon Ihlefeld, SNL

107

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects 2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. ARRA project presentations from the second poster session on Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Georgianne Huff, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - 20 MW Flywheel Frequency Regulation Plant - Jim Arseneaux, Beacon Power ESS 2012 Peer Review - Advanced Implementation of Community ESS for Grid Support - Haukur Asgeirsson, Detroit Edison ESS 2012 Peer Review - Notrees Wind Storage - Jeff Gates, Duke Energy ESS 2012 Peer Review - Compressed Air Energy Storage - Robert Booth,

108

2012 Peer Reviews in June and July | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2012 Peer Reviews in June and July 2012 Peer Reviews in June and July 2012 Peer Reviews in June and July June 12, 2012 - 9:31am Addthis The Department of Energy will hold peer reviews for the Real Time Reliability Management program and the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems (CEDS) program this summer. Peer reviews are an opportunity for energy sector stakeholders to hear updates on ongoing and upcoming projects, provide feedback to program managers, and network with experts from industry, academia, and national laboratories. June 12-13, 2012: Real Time Reliability Management (RTGRM) The Transmission Reliability R&D Program will conduct a peer review of the Real Time Grid Reliability Management RTGRM is part of DOE's Transmission Reliability R&D Program and includes projects in support of the North

109

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Power Electronics Presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Power Electronics Power Electronics Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Power Electronics Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. Eighteen presentations were divided into categories; those related to power electronics are below. Other presentation categories were: Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies Utility & Commercial Applications of Advanced Energy Storage Systems International Energy Storage Programs Innovations in Energy Storage Systems ESS 2007 Peer Review - StatCom with Energy Storage to Smooth Intermittent Power Output of Wind Farms - Mesut Baran, NC State.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - Cyber-Physical Systems Distributed Control - Mariesa

110

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - International Energy Storage  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

International Energy International Energy Storage Program Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - International Energy Storage Program Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. Eighteen presentations were divided into categories; those related to international energy storage programs are below. Other presentation categories were: Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies Utility & Commercial Applications of Advanced Energy Storage Systems Power Electronics Innovations in Energy Storage Systems ESS 2007 Peer Review - DOE-CEC Energy Storage Program FY07 Projects - Daniel Borneo, SNL.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - Joint NYSERDA-DOE Energy Storage Initiative Projects

111

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review 2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review 2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 13 presentations over 2 days on August 6 - 7, 2013 at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY. Presentations are available through the links. The agenda and list of presentations are included below. The Reliability and Markets activity of the Transmission Reliability program researches, develops, and implements electricity infrastructure and market simulations that integrate economics and engineering principles. The activity helps to ensure electric reliability, while also improving the efficiency and economics of market operations. Day 1: August 6 Session I Transmission Investment Assessment Under Uncertainty, Ben Hobbs,

112

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Utility & Commercial Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. Eighteen presentations were divided into categories; those related to utility, commercial, and rail applications of advanced energy storage systems are below. Other presentation categories were: Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies International Energy Storage Programs Power Electronics Innovations in Energy Storage Systems ESS 2007 Peer Review - Application of Large-Scale ESS in AEP - Ali Nourai, AEP.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - Iowa Stored Energy Park - Kent Holst, ISEP.pdf

113

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Innovations in ESS Presentations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Innovations in ESS Innovations in ESS Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Innovations in ESS Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. Eighteen presentations were divided into categories; those related to innovations in energy storage systems are below. Other presentation categories were: Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies Utility & Commercial Applications of Advanced Energy Storage Systems International Energy Storage Programs Power Electronics ESS 2007 Peer Review - Evaluation of Lead-Carbon Storage Devices for Utility Applications - Enders Dickinson, MeadWestvaco.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - High Voltage Electrochemical Capacitor - David

114

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for...

115

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Visualization and Modeling National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for...

116

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Best PracticesStandards Development National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for...

117

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Best Practice DesignConfiguration National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for...

118

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Software Engineering Institute National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for...

119

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Secure Communications National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for...

120

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Wind--Wind Power on Demand - Ian Lawson, General Compression ESS 2012 Peer Review - Novel Regenerative Fuel Cells based on Anion Exchange Membranes - Katherine Ayers, Proton Onsite...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 DOE Energy Storage PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Mission Develop advanced electricity storage and PE technologies, in partnership with industry, for...

122

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems...

123

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - International Energy...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

International Energy Storage Program Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - International Energy Storage Program Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems...

124

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER REVIEW John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories ESS Program Makeup ESS Base Program - CECDOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - NYSERDADOE...

125

Geothermal Technologies Program 2010 Peer Review | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Number NA DOI Not Provided Check for DOI availability: http:crossref.org Online Internet link for Geothermal Technologies Program 2010 Peer Review Citation Joe Iovenitti....

126

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Sodium Intercalation Battery for Stationary...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

LLC 35 Hartwell Avenue Lexington, MA 02421-3102 www.TIAXLLC.com Sodium Intercalation Battery for Stationary Storage Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) Peer Review and Update...

127

Superconductivity for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review Final Report The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability's High Temperature Superconductivity (HTS) for...

128

Microsoft Word - PeerReview_SAR.doc | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

& Publications Microsoft Word - PeerReviewCCSP.doc Microsoft Word - Cross Reference Matrix Introduction.doc DRAFT NEPA Guidance on Consideration of the Effects of Climate Change...

129

Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Peer Reviews | U.S...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Merit Review Policies Early Career Research Opportunities in High Energy...

130

2005 Electric Distribution Peer Review - Agenda and Presentations...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fact Sheets Meetings & Events Electric Distribution R&D FY05 Annual Program and Peer Review Meeting April 19 & 20, 2005 Georgia Tech Conference Center Atlanta, Georgia Agenda...

131

Understanding broadcast based peer review on open source software projects  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Software peer review has proven to be a successful technique in open source software (OSS) development. In contrast to industry, where reviews are typically assigned to specific individuals, changes are broadcast to hundreds of potentially interested ... Keywords: case studies, grounded theory, open source software, peer review

Peter C. Rigby; Margaret-Anne Storey

2011-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

132

peer  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 AUDIT REPORT THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S PEER REVIEW PRACTICES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE OF AUDIT SERVICES APRIL 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Acting Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION : Audit Report on "The Department of Energy's Peer Review Practices" BACKGROUND Fulfilling the requirements of the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 has presented Federal science agencies with the challenge of defining ways to quantify and evaluate the outcomes of research. Measuring research program performance is particularly important for the Department of Energy because of its substantial investment (approximately $7 billion in Fiscal Year 1996) in research and development

133

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronics  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

& Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronics (PE) Systems Presentations Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronics (PE) Systems Presentations The 2008 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) was held in Washington DC on Sept. 29-30, 2008. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. The 2008 agenda was composed of 28 projects that covered a broad range of new and ongoing, state-of-the-art, energy storage and power electronics technologies, including updates on the collaborations among DOE/ESPE, CEC in California, and NYSERDA in New York. Power Electronics (PE) Systems presentations are available below. ESPE 2008 Peer Review - High Power Density Silicon Carbide Power Electronic

134

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy Storage  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

& Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Presentations Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Presentations The 2008 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) was held in Washington DC on Sept. 29-30, 2008. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. The 2008 agenda was composed of 28 projects that covered a broad range of new and ongoing, state-of-the-art, energy storage and power electronics technologies, including updates on the collaborations among DOE/ESPE, CEC in California, and NYSERDA in New York. Energy Storage Systems (ESS) presentations are available below. ESPE 2008 Peer Review - EAC Energy Storage Subcommittee - Brad Roberts, S&C

135

SRS Waste Solidification Building Project Peer Review, July 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SRS-2011-07-15 SRS-2011-07-15 Site: Savannah River Site, NA-26 Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Waste Solidification Building Project Peer Review Dates of Activity : 07/12/2011 - 07/15/2011 Report Preparer: James Lockridge Activity Description/Purpose: At the request of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Office of Enterprise Project Management (NA- APM-20), the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), provided an expert to review the Waste Solidification Building (WSB) startup programs and procedures associated with worker safety and health, environment, and security. Criteria for the review was detailed in the Criteria,

136

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review - Agenda  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Page 1 of 3 Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Page 1 of 3 U.S. Department of Energy Smart Grid R&D Peer Review San Diego Gas & Electric Energy Innovation Center 4760 Clairemont Mesa Blvd San Diego, California June 7-8, 2012 AGENDA Thursday, June 7, 2012 8:00 am Registration and Continental Breakfast 8:30 am - 8:40 am Welcome David Geier, Vice President Electric Operations, San Diego Gas & Electric 8:40 am - 9:00 am OE's R&D Division/Smart Grid R&D Program Hank Kenchington/Dan Ton, U.S. Department of Energy Moderator - Dan Ton, U.S. Department of Energy 9:00 am - 9:30 am Smart Inverter Controls and Microgrid Interoperation at DECC Tom Rizy, ORNL 9:30 am - 10:00 am CERTS Microgrid Test Bed Joe Eto, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

137

Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Peer Reviews | U.S. DOE Office of  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Peer Reviews High Energy Physics (HEP) HEP Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of HEP Funding Opportunities Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Merit / Review Policies Early Career Research Opportunities in High Energy Physics Graduate Fellows in High Energy Theory Guidelines Advisory Committees News & Resources Contact Information High Energy Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-25/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3624 F: (301) 903-2597 E: sc.hep@science.doe.gov More Information » Peer Merit / Review Policies Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Peer Reviews Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page

138

2005 Electric Distribution Peer Review - Agenda and Presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Information Center » Library » Peer Reviews » 2005 Electric Information Center » Library » Peer Reviews » 2005 Electric Distribution Peer Review - Agenda and Presentations 2005 Electric Distribution Peer Review - Agenda and Presentations Electric Distribution R&D FY05 Annual Program and Peer Review Meeting April 19 & 20, 2005 Georgia Tech Conference Center Atlanta, Georgia Agenda (PDF 96 KB) Plenary Sessions Welcome and Our New Office of Electricity and Energy Assurance - Kevin Kolevar, DOE Overview of the Electric Distribution R&D - Eric Lightner, DOE Presentation (PDF 883 KB). GridWise Architectural Council - Rik Drummond, Drummond Group, Inc. Presentation (PDF 1.5 MB). Advanced Grid Application Consortium (GridApp) - James Crane, Exelon Corp. Presentation (PDF 1.6 MB). Session 1: Monitoring and Load Management Technologies

139

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Presentations 1 Presentations 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review included seven sessions over 2 days on June 12 - 13, 2012. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through V) are available below. Session I: Dan Trudnowski, Ning Zhou, Mani Venkatasubramanian Session II: Brett Amidan, Bharat Bhargava, Ning Zhou Session III: Ken Martin, Mani Venkatasubramanian Session IV: Jeff Dagle, Jim Dyer, Joe Gracia, Joe Eto Session V: Joe Eto 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Measurement-Based Stability Assessment - Dan Trudnowski, U Montana 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Mode Meter Development - Ning Zhou, PNNL 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Oscillation Monitoring System

140

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment (TSPA) Peer Review Panel for predicting the performance of a repository at Yucca Mountain. TSPA First Interim Report - June 20, 1997 TSPA Second Interim Report - December 12, 1997 TSPA Third Interim Report - March, 1998 TSPA Final Report - February 11, 1999 Joint NEA-IAEA International Peer Review of the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project's Total System Performance Assessment Supporting the Site Recommendation Process - December, 2001 More Documents & Publications Yucca Mountain Science and Engineering Report TSPA Model Development and Sensitivity Analysis of Processes Affecting Performance of a Salt Repository for Disposal of Heat-Generating Nuclear

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment (TSPA) Peer Review Panel for predicting the performance of a repository at Yucca Mountain. TSPA First Interim Report - June 20, 1997 TSPA Second Interim Report - December 12, 1997 TSPA Third Interim Report - March, 1998 TSPA Final Report - February 11, 1999 Joint NEA-IAEA International Peer Review of the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project's Total System Performance Assessment Supporting the Site Recommendation Process - December, 2001 More Documents & Publications Yucca Mountain Science and Engineering Report TSPA Model Development and Sensitivity Analysis of Processes Affecting Performance of a Salt Repository for Disposal of Heat-Generating Nuclear

142

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting June 16, 2014...

143

2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Presentations 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included six sessions over 2 days on June 27 - 28, 2013. Presentations from Day 2 (Sessions V and VI) are available below. Session V: Ken Martin (EPG), Jim Thorp (Virginia Tech), Scott Ghiocel (RPI), Mani Venkatasubramanian (WSU) Session VI: Pete Sauer (U Illinois), Carlos Martinez (ASR), Gil Tam (EPG) 2013 TR Review - Data Validation & Conditioning - Ken Martin, EPG 2013 TR Review - Synchrophasor Data Conditioning and Validation - Jim Thorp, Virginia Tech 2013 TR Review - PMU-based Voltage Stability - Scott Ghiocel, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 2013 TR Review - Oscillation Monitoring System - Mani Venkatasubramanian,

144

2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Presentations 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included six sessions over 2 days on June 27 - 28, 2013. Presentations from Day 2 (Sessions V and VI) are available below. Session V: Ken Martin (EPG), Jim Thorp (Virginia Tech), Scott Ghiocel (RPI), Mani Venkatasubramanian (WSU) Session VI: Pete Sauer (U Illinois), Carlos Martinez (ASR), Gil Tam (EPG) 2013 TR Review - Data Validation & Conditioning - Ken Martin, EPG 2013 TR Review - Synchrophasor Data Conditioning and Validation - Jim Thorp, Virginia Tech 2013 TR Review - PMU-based Voltage Stability - Scott Ghiocel, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 2013 TR Review - Oscillation Monitoring System - Mani Venkatasubramanian,

145

Independent Oversight Review, Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review, Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project - April 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project - April 2013 April 2013 Review of Radiation...

146

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. The final agenda and welcome presentation are below. Presentations

147

Visualization & Controls Program Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Visualization & Controls Program Peer Review Visualization & Controls Program Peer Review Visualization & Controls Program Peer Review With mounting evidence suggesting an increased probability that malicious attacks may be launched against energy control systems, there is a critical need to understand specific cyber vulnerabilities and corresponding mitigation strategies. This need is being addressed by SCADA/ Energy Management System (EMS) Cyber Security Assessments conducted at the National SCADA Test Bed (NSTB) facility at INL and at on-site field installations of control systems. Visualization & Controls Program Peer Review More Documents & Publications DOE/OE National SCADA Test Bed Fiscal Year 2009 Work Plan DOE National SCADA Test Bed Program Multi-Year Plan Vulnerability Analysis of Energy Delivery Control Systems - 2011

148

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. The final agenda and welcome presentation are below. Presentations

149

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Presentations 1 Presentations 2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 6 sessions over 2 days on August 6 - 7, 2013. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through IV) are available below. Session I: Ben Hobbs (Johns Hopkins), Kameshwar Poolla (UC Berkeley) Session II: Ray Zimmerman (Cornell), Hsiao-Dong Chiang (Cornell) Session III: Shmuel Oren (UC Berkeley), Dan Tylavsky (U Arizona), Tom Overbye (U Illinois) Session IV: Lindsay Anderson (Cornell), HyungSeon Oh (Cornell) 2013 R&M Peer Review - Assessing Transmission Investments Under Uncertainty - Ben Hobbs, Johns Hopkins 2013 R&M Peer Review - Coordinated Aggregation of Distributed Energy Resources - Kameshwar Poolla, UC Berkeley

150

NETL: SECA Workshop Proceedings, Peer Reviews, and Annual Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Solid State Energy Conversion Alliance (SECA) SECA Workshop Proceedings and Peer Reviews The proceedings from the all workshops that the SECA program has sponsored are described on this page. In addition, the Peer Review Results are also summarized. Annual Workshop Proceedings Core Technology Workshop Proceedings Peer Review Results 2008 SECA 9th Annual Workshop & Peer Review CD Cover Annual Workshop Proceedings 13th Annual SECA Workshop - Pittsburgh, PA (July 2012) 12th Annual SECA Workshop - Pittsburgh, PA (July 2011) 11th Annual SECA Workshop - Pittsburgh, PA (July 2010) 10th Annual SECA Workshop - Pittsburgh, PA (July 2009) 9th Annual SECA Workshop - Pittsburgh, PA (Aug 2008) 8th Annual SECA Workshop - San Antonio, TX (Aug 2007) 7th Annual SECA Workshop - Philadelphia, PA (Sept 2006)

151

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations are available through individual session links and the agenda is below. Presentations: Day 1: June 7 Morning session | Moderator: Dan Ton, DOE Afternoon sessions | Moderators: Eric Lightner and Merrill Smith, DOE Day 2: June 8 Morning session | Moderator: Merrill Smith, DOE Smart Grid Panel Discussion | Moderator: Lee Krevat, SDG&E First afternoon session | Moderator: Dan Ton, DOE Second afternoon session | Moderator: Eric Lightner, DOE

152

2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included six sessions over 2 days on June 27 - 28, 2013. Presentations are available through the individual session links. The agenda and introduction by Joe Eto, LBNL, are available below. Day 1: June 27 Session I Baselining Studies and Analysis, Bharat Bhargava, EPG Baselining Studies and Analysis, Brett Amidan, PNNL Synchrophasor Standards Support and Development, Ken Martin, EPG Session II Advanced Synchrophasor Metrology, Stan Hadley, ORNL GPS Issue Management, Mark Buckner, ORNL Technology Assessment for Next Generation PMU, Mark Buckner, ORNL Session III Measurement-Based Stability Assessment, Dan Trudnowski, U. Montana

153

2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reliability & Markets Peer Review Reliability & Markets Peer Review 2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 11 presentations over 2 days on August 7 - 8, 2012 at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY. Presentations and summaries are available through the links and the agenda is included below. Summaries | Full Presentations Day 1: August 7 Transmission Investment Assessment Under Uncertainty About Fuel Prices, Technology, Renewables Penetration and Market Responses Using a Multi-State Stochastic Model Approach with Recourse Renewable Integration Through Risk-Limiting Dispatch and Distributed Resource Aggregations Development and Testing of New Tools Commercialization of the SuperOPF Framework: Phase 2 Essence of Structure Preserving (ESP) Network Reductions for

154

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Power Electronics Presentati...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Systems Distributed Control - Mariesa Crow, U Missouri-Rolla.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - SiC Power Converter System Thermal Mgmt and High Temp Packaging - Timothy Lin, Aegis.pdf...

155

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Poster Session 2 (Day 2): SBIR Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): SBIR Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program...

156

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Poster Session 1 (Day 1): ARPA-E Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): ARPA-E Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems...

157

ORISE: Scientific Peer Review for State and Federal Agencies  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Peer Review The Oak Ridge Institute for Science Education (ORISE) supports federal agencies-such as the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), U.S. Department of Homeland Security...

158

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 6 sessions over 2 days on August 6 - 7, 2013. Presentations from Day 2 (Sessions V and VI) are available below....

159

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Modeling - Mario Martinez...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Flow Battery Modeling Energy Storage Systems Peer Review September 26-28, 2012 MJ Martinez (PI), J...

160

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Membrane - David Ofer, Tiax  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TIAX LLC TIAX LLC 35 Hartwell Avenue Lexington, MA 02421-3102 www.TIAXLLC.com Flow Battery Membrane Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) Peer Review and Update Meeting 2012...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

2012 Load as a Resource Program Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Load as a Resource Program Peer Review Load as a Resource Program Peer Review 2012 Load as a Resource Program Peer Review The Transmission Reliability R&D Load as a Resource (LAAR) Program peer review included 8 presentations on September 20, 2012 at Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. Agenda and presentations are below. 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Agenda 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Frequency Response Demand - Jeff Dagle, PNNL 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Frequency Responsive Load Evaluation and Benefits - Isabelle Snyder, ORNL 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Load as a Regulation Resource, Phase 2 - Sila Kiliccote, LBNL 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Scoping Study on Industrial Regulation - Nasr Alkadi, ORNL 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Integration and Extension of Direct Load Management of Smart Loads - Anna Scaglioni, UC Davis

162

March, 2010 NIFS Administrative Council External Peer Review Committee  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

21 2010 3 March, 2010 NIFS Administrative Council External Peer Review Committee NIFS Peer DEMO LHD V NIFS-HEAT W Y Li MHD Er2O3 Li Li-Pb FlibeF-BeF2 #12;10 V 4 FlibeF-BeF2 been invoked to enhance the electron current in V3Ga. In the NIFS engineering research, the main goals

Ito, Atsushi

163

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - March 2012 March 2012 Review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Nuclear Facility Configuration...

164

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Laboratory Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility - January 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility -...

165

2010 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review 2010 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review The Transmission Reliability research area focuses on two key areas: 1) Real-Time Grid Reliability Management and 2) Reliability and Markets. The first area develops monitoring and analysis tools that process synchrophasor data to enable real-time assessment of grid status and stability margins, with the goal of improving power system reliability and visibility through wide-area measurement and control. It is developing advanced technologies and tools to help create a resilient electric transmission system that can better detect disturbances, accommodate a variety of generation sources, and automatically reconfigure the grid to prevent widespread outages and/or rebalance the system. The second area

166

VISUALIZATION & CONTROLS PEER REVIEW PRESENTATIONS | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

VISUALIZATION & CONTROLS PEER REVIEW PRESENTATIONS VISUALIZATION & CONTROLS PEER REVIEW PRESENTATIONS VISUALIZATION & CONTROLS PEER REVIEW PRESENTATIONS PROGRAM AGENDA Marriott Crystal City at Reagan National Airport 1999 Jefferson Davis Highway Arlington, Virginia 22202 October 18, 2006 7:30 - 8:30 a.m. Continental Breakfast Times CONTROL SYSTEMS CONTROL SYSTEMS SECURITY 8:30 - 8:45 Introduction - Phil Overholt philip.overholt@hq.doe.gov Introduction - Hank Kenchington henry.kenchington@hq.doe.gov 8:45 - 9:15 Overview of Reliability and Markets Bob Thomas, PSERC/Cornell Univ. rjt1@cornell.edu Cyber Security Assessments of Control Systems in the Energy Sector Bob Hill, INL robert.hill@inl.gov 9:15 - 9:45 Market Monitoring Tools Bernard Lesieutre, LBNL bclesieutre@lbnl.gov Cyber Security Assessments of Inter Control Center Communications Protocol Implementations

167

Superconductivity for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review Final  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review Final Report Superconductivity for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review Final Report The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability's High Temperature Superconductivity (HTS) for Electric Systems Program's specific mission is to work in partnership with industry to develop HTS wire and perform other research and development activities leading to the commercialization of HTS-based electric power applications by U.S. companies. This technology contributes to several key performance improvements of the grid. It enhances reliability by increasing capacity, which relieves congestion and helps prevent outages. Efficiency is improved as a result of the reduction of loss during operation which both conserves

168

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Secure Communications Secure Communications Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Secure Communications National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Secure Communications are below. CEDS 2010 Peer Review - Cryptographic Trust Management - Mark Hadley,

169

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Software Engineering Institute Software Engineering Institute Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Software Engineering Institute National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations from Carnegie Mellon University's Software Engineering

170

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Visualization and Modeling Visualization and Modeling Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Visualization and Modeling National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Visualization and Modeling are below.

171

Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project Transportation - September 2000 Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project Transportation - September 2000 September 2000 Transportation Emergency Management Review of the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) and National Transportation Program (NTP)/Transportation Compliance Evaluation/Assistance Program (TCEAP) The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Emergency Management Oversight, within the Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance, conducted a transportation emergency management review of the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) and National Transportation Program (NTP)/Transportation Compliance Evaluation/Assistance Program (TCEAP) in September 2000.

172

2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Presentations 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included six sessions over 2 days on June 27 - 28, 2013. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through IV) are available below. Session I: Bharat Bhargava (EPG), Brett Amidan (PNNL), Ken Martin (EPG) Session II: Mark Buckner (ORNL) Session III: Dan Trudnowski (U Montana), Ning Zhou (PNNL) Session IV: Frank Tuffner (PNNL), Bernie Lesieutre (U Wisconsin), Harold Kirkham (PNNL), YC Zhang (NREL) 2013 TR Review - Eastern Interconnection Phase Angle Base Lining Study - Bharat Bhargava, EPG 2013 TR Review - Baselining Studies and Analysis - Brett Amidan, PNNL 2013 TR Review - Synchrophasor Standards Development and Support - Ken Martin, EPG

173

2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Presentations 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included six sessions over 2 days on June 27 - 28, 2013. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through IV) are available below. Session I: Bharat Bhargava (EPG), Brett Amidan (PNNL), Ken Martin (EPG) Session II: Mark Buckner (ORNL) Session III: Dan Trudnowski (U Montana), Ning Zhou (PNNL) Session IV: Frank Tuffner (PNNL), Bernie Lesieutre (U Wisconsin), Harold Kirkham (PNNL), YC Zhang (NREL) 2013 TR Review - Eastern Interconnection Phase Angle Base Lining Study - Bharat Bhargava, EPG 2013 TR Review - Baselining Studies and Analysis - Brett Amidan, PNNL 2013 TR Review - Synchrophasor Standards Development and Support - Ken Martin, EPG

174

Peer Review 2008 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Subject: Report on the Quality Assessment Review of the Investigative Operations of the Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Energy Reviewer: U.S. Small...

175

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day One of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Program Overview - Eric Lightner, DOE_0.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - University of HI Renewable and Distributed Systems - Jay Griffen, Univ. of HI.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Demonstration of a Coordinated and Integrated System - Dennis Summer, Fort Collins_0.pdf

176

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day Three of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Smart Charger Technology Development, Frank Tuffner, PNNL.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Vehicle to Grid Demonstration - Willett Kempton, U. Delaware.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Estimating and Mitigating Cascading Failure Risk - Paul Hines, U. Vermont.pdf

177

Final Report of theIgneous Consequences Peer Review Panel | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Report of theIgneous Consequences Peer Review Panel Final Report of theIgneous Consequences Peer Review Panel A report for the DOE on the Yucca Mountain Project. Final Report...

178

Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Operations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Operations Office - December 2010 Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Operations Office - December 2010 December 2010 Specific Administrative Controls Review with the Office of Environmental Management at DOE-Richland Operations Office The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, participated in the Office of Environmental Management Office of Standards and Quality Assurance, EM-23, review of Specific Administrative Controls (SAC) at the Hanford Site. The EM-23 review included selected programs at the Hanford Site that are under the auspices of the DOE Richland Operations Office. Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Operations

179

Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report on Dual-Purpose Canister Disposal Alternatives (FY13) A Review of Stress Corrosion CrackingFatigue Modeling for Light Water Reactor Cooling System Components Working...

180

Peer Review 2009 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

for the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2009 Reviewer: Social Security Administration, Office of the Inspector General The attached report presents the results of our external...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2011 September 2011 Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The purpose of this review was to assess the effectiveness of the integrated safety management system (ISMS) established and implemented by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2011 More Documents & Publications Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Technical Appendices, Volume II, December 2004 Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,

182

Independent Oversight Review of Integrated Safety Management...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Enforcement and Oversight Independent Oversight Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at the Livermore Site Office October 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency...

183

External Independent Review (EIR) Standard Operating Procedure...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) External Independent Review (EIR) Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) EIR SOP.pdf More Documents & Publications ICR-ICE Standard Operating...

184

Peer Review Policy | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Review Policy Grants & Contracts Guidance Laboratory Scientific Focus Area...

185

Independent Oversight Special Review, Headquarters - August 2008 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Special Review, Headquarters - August 2008 Independent Oversight Special Review, Headquarters - August 2008 Independent Oversight Special Review, Headquarters - August 2008 August 2008 Review of Construction Safety and Health Programs This special review of construction safety was performed by the Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), to provide feedback to DOE line management and contractors on the effectiveness of line organizations at DOE sites in implementing construction safety requirements. This special review is based on data collected over the past three years (covering the timeframe from late 2005 to early 2008) during scheduled inspections performed by Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations, at the

186

2012 CERTS Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Agenda  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

R&M Review August 7-8, 2012 Cornell University Statler Hotel 130 Statler Drive | Ithaca, NY 14853 (607) 257-2500 Day 1: August 7, 2011 The meeting will be held in the Statler Hotel...

187

FINAL REPORT WASTE PACKAGE MATERIALS PERFORMANCE PEER REVIEW PANEL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

REPORT REPORT WASTE PACKAGE MATERIALS PERFORMANCE PEER REVIEW PANEL FEBRUARY 28, 2002 This document is not an official copy and is for informational purposes only. Signature Page Preface Executive Summary TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Organization of the Peer Review 1.2 Objectives of the Review 1.3 Content of the Final Report 2. MAIN FINDINGS 2.1 Perspective 2.2 Overall Findings 2.3 Corrosion Degradation Modes 2.4 Higher or Lower Temperature Operating Modes 2.5 Long-Term Uniform Corrosion of Passive Metal 2.6 Alloy Specification and Comparison 2.7 Technical Issues to be Resolved 2.8 Organizational-Managerial Issues 3. SUMMARY OF DEGRADATION MODES AND CONTRIBUTING FACTORS 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Repository Conditions: Overview of Time, Temperature, Environment

188

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and Peer Evaluation Report to someone by E-mail and Peer Evaluation Report to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on AddThis.com... Publications Program Publications Roadmaps Program Plans Reports to Congress Annual Progress Reports

189

Independent Oversight Targeted Review, Sandia National Laboratories -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Targeted Review, Sandia National Laboratories Targeted Review, Sandia National Laboratories - November 2013 Independent Oversight Targeted Review, Sandia National Laboratories - November 2013 December 2013 Targeted Review of Activity-Level Implementation of Radiological Controls at Sandia National Laboratories This report documents the results of an independent oversight targeted review of radiological protection program activity-level implementation for Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), Technical Area V facilities. SNL is managed by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, under contract to the Department of Energy (DOE) and is overseen by the National Nuclear Security Administration and its Sandia Field Office. This targeted review was performed at SNL September 23-27,

190

Commercial Lighting Solutions Webtool Peer Review Report, Office Solutions  

SciTech Connect

The Commercial Lighting Solutions (CLS) project directly supports the U.S. Department of Energys Commercial Building Energy Alliance efforts to design high performance buildings. CLS creates energy efficient best practice lighting designs for widespread use, and they are made available to users via an interactive webtool that both educates and guides the end user through the application of the Lighting Solutions. This report summarizes the peer review of the CLS webtool for offices. The methodology for the peer review process included data collection (stakeholder input), analysis of the comments, and organization of the input into categories for prioritization of the comments against a set of criteria. Based on this process, recommendations were developed for the release of version 2.0 of the webtool at the Lightfair conference in Las Vegas in May 2010. The report provides a list of the top ten most significant and relevant improvements that will be made within the webtool for version 2.0 as well as appendices containing the comments and short-term priorities in additional detail. Peer review comments that are considered high priority by the reviewers and the CLS team but cannot be completed for Version 2.0 are listed as long-term recommendations.

Beeson, Tracy A.; Jones, Carol C.

2010-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

191

SUPPLEMENTAL COLUMBIA RIVER PROTECTION ACTIVITIES AT THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY HANFORD SITE: 2006 TECHNICAL PEER REVIEW  

SciTech Connect

Prompted by a $10 million Congressional allocation to identify supplemental actions to protect the Columbia River from groundwater contamination beneath the Hanford Reservation, the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management (EM) Office of Clean-up Technology identified twenty-three potential technical projects and then down-selected ten of these for further evaluation. An independent expert peer review was conducted for the ten down-selected proposals. The review panel consisted of twenty-three recognized subject matter experts that broadly represented academia, industry, and federal laboratories. Of the initial ten proposals reviewed, one was given unconditional support, six were given conditional support, and three were not supported as proposed. Three additional proposals were then submitted by DOE for review--these proposals were structured, in part, to respond to the initial round of technical peer review comments. Peer reviews of these additional proposals provided conditional support. For those proposals that received conditional support, DOE requested specific implementation and work plans and assessed whether the plans adequately addressed the technical conditions identified by the review panel. The final list of technology proposals receiving support, or conditional support, primarily focused on understanding and reducing the potential impacts of uranium, chromium, and strontium from facilities adjacent to the Columbia River, with a secondary focus on understanding and limiting the future Columbia River impacts from the large carbon tetrachloride groundwater plume underlying and downgradient of the Hanford Central Plateau facilities. The results and recommendations of the peer reviews informed the final DOE project selections and supported implementation of the selected projects to protect the Columbia River and address groundwater contamination at Hanford.

Looney, B; Dawn Kaback; Gene Leboeuf; Jason Mulvihill-Kuntz; Lynn Lefkoff

2006-12-20T23:59:59.000Z

192

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Vulnerability and Instrusion Detection are below.

193

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Vulnerability and Instrusion Detection are below.

194

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Best Practices/Standards Development Best Practices/Standards Development Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Best Practices/Standards Development National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Best Practices/Standards Development are below.

195

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 DOE Energy Storage Program 7 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review FY07 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Mission Mission Develop advanced electricity storage and PE technologies, in partnership with industry, for modernizing and expanding the electric supply. This will improve the quality, reliability, flexibility and cost effectiveness of the existing system. Help create an energy storage industry Make energy storage ubiquitous ESS Program Makeup ESS Program Makeup ESS Base Program - CEC/DOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - NYSERDA/DOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - BPA ETO based STATCOM Project - ETO Development Project - Boeing Superconducting Flywheel - ACONF Coast Guard Project - Iowa Stored Energy Project - Electrolyte Research

196

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Practice Design/Configuration Practice Design/Configuration Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Best Practice Design/Configuration National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Best Practice Design/Configuration are below.

197

2005 Conference Proceedings: SECA Core Technology Program Peer Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Program Peer Review Program Peer Review October 25-26, 2005 Table of Contents Disclaimer Papers and Presentations Materials Modeling & Simulation Balance of Plant Cell Components Breakout Sections Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government or any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

198

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Trustworthy Cyber Infrastructure for the Power Grid (TCIPG) Trustworthy Cyber Infrastructure for the Power Grid (TCIPG) Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Trustworthy Cyber Infrastructure for the Power Grid (TCIPG) National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs.

199

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 DOE Energy Storage 8 DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) PEER Review FY08 DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Sandia is a multi-program laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration, under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000 Mission Mission Develop advanced electricity storage and PE technologies, in partnership with industry, for modernizing and expanding the electric supply. This will improve the quality, reliability, flexibility and cost effectiveness of the existing system. Help create an energy storage industry Develop advanced power electronics for the grid of the future

200

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2009 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 18 -22, 2009, in Arlington, Virginia.

Satyapal, S.

2009-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 2 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, 2, Session 2 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 2 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the second session of Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Ross Guttromson, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Na-ion Intercalation Electrodes for Na-ion Battery - Jun Liu, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Unique Li-ion Batteries for Utility Applications - Daiwon Choi, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Carbon Enhanced VRLA Batteries - David Enos, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Improved Properties of Nanocomposites for Flywheel Applications - Tim Boyle, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Magnetic Composites for Flywheel Energy Storage -

202

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 1 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 1 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the first session of Day 3, chaired by Sandia's Dan Borneo, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-OE FY12 Electrical Energy Storage Demonstration Projects - Dan Borneo, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - State & Federal Energy Storage Technology Advancement Partnership - Todd Olinsky-Paul, CESA ESS 2012 Peer Review - Life Cycle Testing and Evaluation of Energy Storage Devices - Summer Ferreira, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Energy Storage Test Pad - David Rose, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Protocol for Measuring and Expressing Performance

203

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 1 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 1 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the first session of Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Tony Martino, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - CAES Geo Performance for Natural Gas and Salt Reservoirs and TMH Response of GSFs - Payton Gardner, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Thermoelectrochemical Energy Storage - Nick Hudak, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Component Research for Redox Flow Batteries - Tom Zawodzinski, ORNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Nitrogen-Oxygen Battery for Large Scale Energy Storage - Frank Delnick, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Sodium-based Battery Development - Dave Ingersoll,

204

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Morning Presentations Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day One of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Program Overview - Eric Lightner, DOE_0.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - University of HI Renewable and Distributed Systems - Jay Griffen, Univ. of HI.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Demonstration of a Coordinated and Integrated System - Dennis Summer, Fort Collins_0.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Integrated & Automated DG Technologies Demo - Roger

205

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 2 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 2 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the second session of Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Ross Guttromson, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Na-ion Intercalation Electrodes for Na-ion Battery - Jun Liu, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Unique Li-ion Batteries for Utility Applications - Daiwon Choi, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Carbon Enhanced VRLA Batteries - David Enos, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Improved Properties of Nanocomposites for Flywheel Applications - Tim Boyle, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Magnetic Composites for Flywheel Energy Storage -

206

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 2 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Day 3, Day 3, Session 2 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 2 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the second session of Day 3, chaired by PNNL's Landis Kannberg, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Advanced Membranes for VRFB - Cy Fujimoto, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Advanced Materials for Flow Batteries - Travis Anderson, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Modeling - Mario Martinez, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - New Generation Redox Flow Battery Prototype Development - Vincent Sprenkle, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - New Generation Aqueous Base Redox Flow Battery

207

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Afternoon Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Afternoon Presentations Afternoon Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Afternoon Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day Two of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Intelligent Power Infrastructure Consortium - Deepak Divan, Georgia Institute of Technology.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - HI Sustainable Energy Project, Part 1 - Jennifer Stinebaugh, SNL.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - HI Sustainable Energy Project, Part 2 - Ben Kroposki, NREL.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Marin County Renewables, David Cohen, Infotility.pdf

208

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Morning Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Morning Presentations Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day Two of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Borrego Springs Microgrid - Tom Bialek, SDG&E.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - CERTS Microgrid Demonstration - Craig Gee, Chevron.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Texas Microgrids for Colonias and Renewable Microgrid STEM Education - Dean Schneider, TCAT.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - CERTS Microgrid Test Bed - Joe Eto, LBNL.pdf

209

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 1 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 1 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the first session of Day 3, chaired by Sandia's Dan Borneo, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-OE FY12 Electrical Energy Storage Demonstration Projects - Dan Borneo, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - State & Federal Energy Storage Technology Advancement Partnership - Todd Olinsky-Paul, CESA ESS 2012 Peer Review - Life Cycle Testing and Evaluation of Energy Storage Devices - Summer Ferreira, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Energy Storage Test Pad - David Rose, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Protocol for Measuring and Expressing Performance

210

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Three Morning Presentations Three Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day Three of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Smart Charger Technology Development, Frank Tuffner, PNNL.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Vehicle to Grid Demonstration - Willett Kempton, U. Delaware.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Estimating and Mitigating Cascading Failure Risk - Paul Hines, U. Vermont.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - GridWise Architecture - Ronald Melton, PNNL.pdf

211

Independent Scientific Review Panel Umatilla Initiative Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

there is not sufficient water available to be able to maintain minimum flows or target flows for fish. In fact, the river......................................... 8 A. Instream Flow Enhancement...................................................................................... 8 1. Review of Individual Flow and Passage Projects

212

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 September 2013 Review of the Fire Protection Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of the fire protection program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The review was performed June 10-21, 2013, by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, which is within the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security. The review was one part of a targeted assessment of fire protection at nuclear facilities across the DOE complex, including National Nuclear Security Administration sites. The purpose of the Independent Oversight targeted assessment was to

213

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 September 2013 Review of the Fire Protection Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of the fire protection program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The review was performed June 10-21, 2013, by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, which is within the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security. The review was one part of a targeted assessment of fire protection at nuclear facilities across the DOE complex, including National Nuclear Security Administration sites. The purpose of the Independent Oversight targeted assessment was to

214

External Peer Review Team Report Underground Testing Area Subproject for Frenchman Flat, Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

An external peer review was conducted to review the groundwater models used in the corrective action investigation stage of the Underground Test Area (UGTA) subproject to forecast zones of potential contamination in 1,000 years for the Frenchman Flat area. The goal of the external peer review was to provide technical evaluation of the studies and to assist in assessing the readiness of the UGTA subproject to progress to monitoring activities for further model evaluation. The external peer review team consisted of six independent technical experts with expertise in geology, hydrogeology,'''groundwater modeling, and radiochemistry. The peer review team was tasked with addressing the following questions: 1. Are the modeling approaches, assumptions, and model results for Frenchman Flat consistent with the use of modeling studies as a decision tool for resolution of environmental and regulatory requirements? 2. Do the modeling results adequately account for uncertainty in models of flow and transport in the Frenchman Flat hydrological setting? a. Are the models of sufficient scale/resolution to adequately predict contaminant transport in the Frenchman Flat setting? b. Have all key processes been included in the model? c. Are the methods used to forecast contaminant boundaries from the transport modeling studies reasonable and appropriate? d. Are the assessments of uncertainty technically sound and consistent with state-of-the-art approaches currently used in the hydrological sciences? 3. Are the datasets and modeling results adequate for a transition to Corrective Action Unit monitoring studiesthe next stage in the UGTA strategy for Frenchman Flat? The peer review team is of the opinion that, with some limitations, the modeling approaches, assumptions, and model results are consistent with the use of modeling studies for resolution of environmental and regulatory requirements. The peer review team further finds that the modeling studies have accounted for uncertainty in models of flow and transport in the Frenchman Flat except for a few deficiencies described in the report. Finally, the peer review team concludes that the UGTA subproject has explored a wide range of variations in assumptions, methods, and data, and should proceed to the next stage with an emphasis on monitoring studies. The corrective action strategy, as described in the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, states that the groundwater flow and transport models for each corrective action unit will consider, at a minimum, the following: Alternative hydrostratigraphic framework models of the modeling domain. Uncertainty in the radiological and hydrological source terms. Alternative models of recharge. Alternative boundary conditions and groundwater flows. Multiple permissive sets of calibrated flow models. Probabilistic simulations of transport using plausible sets of alternative framework and recharge models, and boundary and groundwater flows from calibrated flow models. Ensembles of forecasts of contaminant boundaries. Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses of model outputs. The peer review team finds that these minimum requirements have been met. While the groundwater modeling and uncertainty analyses have been quite detailed, the peer review team has identified several modeling-related issues that should be addressed in the next phase of the corrective action activities: Evaluating and using water-level gradients from the pilot wells at the Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site in model calibration. Re-evaluating the use of geochemical age-dating data to constrain model calibrations. Developing water budgets for the alluvial and upper volcanic aquifer systems in Frenchman Flat. Considering modeling approaches in which calculated groundwater flow directions near the water table are not predetermined by model boundary conditions and areas of recharge, all of which are very uncertain. Evaluating local-scale variations in hydraulic conductivity on the calculated contaminant boundaries. Evaluat

Sam Marutzky

2010-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

215

Heavy Vehicle Systems Optimization Merit Review and Peer Evaluation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

06 a n n u a l p r o g r e s s r e p o r t L e s s d e p e n d e n c e o n f o r e i g n o i l t o d a y, a n d t r a n s i t i o n t o a p e t r o l e u m - f r e e , e m i s s i o n s - f r e e v e h i c l e t o m o r r o w . F r e e d o m C A r A n d V e h i C l e T e C h n o l o g i e s P r o g r A m Heavy veHicle SyStemS OptimizatiOn merit review and peer evaluatiOn Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 Dear Colleague: This document summarizes the comments provided by the Review Panel for the FY 2006 Department of Energy (DOE) Heavy Vehicle Systems Optimization Peer Review Meeting, held April 18-20, 2006 at Argonne National Laboratory in suburban Chicago, Illinois. The goal of this document is to provide the reader with a summary of the comments and scores from expert reviewers from industry and government on these systems optimization projects.

216

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review, Lawrence Livermore National Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - December 2009 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - December 2009 December 2009 Review of Nuclear Safety at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed a review of nuclear safety programs at the DOE Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) from October through November 2009. The review was performed by the HSS Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Evaluations. LLNL has made significant progress in establishing and implementing comprehensive programs to effectively manage nuclear safety. LLNL has devoted considerable management attention and resources to enhance nuclear

217

Independent Oversight Focused Program Review, Argonne National  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Focused Program Review, Argonne National Focused Program Review, Argonne National Laboratory-West - May 2001 Independent Oversight Focused Program Review, Argonne National Laboratory-West - May 2001 May 2001 Focused Program Review at Argonne National Laboratory-West The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Emergency Management Oversight, within the Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance, conducted a focused review of the emergency management program at Argonne National Laboratory-West (ANL-W) in May 2001. There were two primary objectives for this review: to evaluate the extent to which the emergency planning hazards assessment (EPHA) document serves as an effective foundation for the ANL-W emergency management program, and to determine whether the necessary interfaces have been established among

218

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Afternoon Presentations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Afternoon Presentations Afternoon Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Afternoon Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The afternoon presentations from Day One of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Interoperability of Demand Response Resources in NY - John Giacona, Con Edison.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Integrated Distribution Management System in AL - Joe Schatz, SCS.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Dramatic Residential Demand Reduction in the Desert Southwest - Yahia Baghzouz, UNLV.pdf

219

Two Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Two Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in Two Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in Environmental Cleanup Mission Two Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in Environmental Cleanup Mission August 15, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Members of the project peer review team for the River Corridor Closure Project at the Hanford site gather for a photo while on a tour of Hanford's B Reactor National Historic Landmark in February. Members of the project peer review team for the River Corridor Closure Project at the Hanford site gather for a photo while on a tour of Hanford's B Reactor National Historic Landmark in February. WASHINGTON, D.C. - EM revamped and expanded peer reviews for its contracts and projects in the past year with a goal of improving performance and delivering results in the world's largest nuclear cleanup

220

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 3 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 3 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the third session of Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Stan Attcity, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Novel High Energy Density Dielectrics for Scalable Capacitor Needs - Geoff Brennecka, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Low Cost, Manufacturable High Voltage Power Module for ESS - Brandon Passmore, APEI ESS 2012 Peer Review - 6.5 kV Silicon Carbide Half-Bridge Power Switch Module for ESS Applications - John Hostetler, United Silicon Carbide ESS 2012 Peer Review - 15 kV Phase Leg Power Modules with SiC Devices -

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 3 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 3 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the third session of Day 1, chaired by Bill Capp of Grid Storage Consulting, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Solution for Smart Grid Renewable Energy Applications - Sheri Nevins, Raytheon & Ron Moss, EnerVault ESS 2012 Peer Review - Painesville Municipal Electric Power Vanadium Redox Battery Demo Project - Jodi Startari, Ashlawn Energy ESS 2012 Peer Review - Energy Storage Controls for Grid Stability - Ray Byrne, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Secondary Use of Vehicle Batteries in Power Systems

222

Two Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in Environmental Cleanup Mission Two Peer Review Processes Help EM Achieve Cost, Schedule Targets in Environmental Cleanup Mission August 15, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Members of the project peer review team for the River Corridor Closure Project at the Hanford site gather for a photo while on a tour of Hanford's B Reactor National Historic Landmark in February. Members of the project peer review team for the River Corridor Closure Project at the Hanford site gather for a photo while on a tour of Hanford's B Reactor National Historic Landmark in February. WASHINGTON, D.C. - EM revamped and expanded peer reviews for its contracts and projects in the past year with a goal of improving performance and delivering results in the world's largest nuclear cleanup

223

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 3 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 1, Session 3 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 3 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the third session of Day 1, chaired by Bill Capp of Grid Storage Consulting, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Solution for Smart Grid Renewable Energy Applications - Sheri Nevins, Raytheon & Ron Moss, EnerVault ESS 2012 Peer Review - Painesville Municipal Electric Power Vanadium Redox Battery Demo Project - Jodi Startari, Ashlawn Energy ESS 2012 Peer Review - Energy Storage Controls for Grid Stability - Ray Byrne, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Secondary Use of Vehicle Batteries in Power Systems

224

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 3 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 3 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the third session of Day 3, chaired by Sandia's Ray Byrne, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Wholesale Electricity Market Design Project - Jim Ellison, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Evaluating Utility Owned Electric ESS - Dhruv Bhatnagar, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - National Assessment of Energy Storage for Grid Balancing and Arbitrage - Michael Kintner-Meyer, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-EPRI Energy Storage Handbook in Collaboration with NRECA - Abbas Akhil, SNL More Documents & Publications

225

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 2 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 1, Session 2 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the second session of Day 1, chaired by NETL's Ron Staubly, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Wind Firming EnergyFarm - Tom Stepien, Primus Power ESS 2012 Peer Review - Grid-Scale Energy Storage Demo for Ancillary Services Using UltraBattery - John Wood, Ecoult ESS 2012 Peer Review - PV Plus Storage for Simultaneous Voltage Smoothing and Peak Shifting - Steve Willard, PNM ESS 2012 Peer Review - Demonstration of a Sodium Ion Battery for Grid Level Applications - Ted Wiley, Aquion Energy

226

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 3 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 3 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the third session of Day 3, chaired by Sandia's Ray Byrne, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Wholesale Electricity Market Design Project - Jim Ellison, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Evaluating Utility Owned Electric ESS - Dhruv Bhatnagar, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - National Assessment of Energy Storage for Grid Balancing and Arbitrage - Michael Kintner-Meyer, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-EPRI Energy Storage Handbook in Collaboration with NRECA - Abbas Akhil, SNL More Documents & Publications

227

Independent Oversight Review, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Pacific Northwest National Laboratory - September 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory - September 2013 September 2013 Review of the Fire Protection Program at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and the Fire Suppression System at the Radiochemical Processing Laboratory. This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of the fire protection program at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) and the fire suppression system at the Radiochemical Processing Laboratory. The review was performed March 18-29, 2013, by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, which is within the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security. The review was performed as one part of an ongoing targeted

228

Peer Review Policies | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Peer Review Policies Basic Energy Sciences (BES) BES Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of BES Funding Opportunities Closed Funding Opportunity...

229

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): National Lab Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 28, 2012.

230

Peer Merit / Review Policies | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Merit Review Policies Early Career Research Opportunities in High Energy...

231

Independent Oversight Review, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Pacific Northwest National Laboratory - October 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory - October 2012 October 2012 Review of the Department of Energy Office of Science Assessment of the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Radiochemical Processing Laboratory Criticality Alarm System The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted a shadow assessment of the Office of Science (SC) review of the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Radiochemical Processing Laboratory (RPL) Criticality Alarm System (CAS). SC's Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) coordinated the SC review. The SC assessment focused on the operability of the CAS at the PNNL RPL

232

Independent Oversight Review, Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant - November 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant - November 2013 November 5, 2013 Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of the preparedness of the DOE Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office, contractors at the DOE Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant, and selected non-leased facilities to respond to a severe natural phenomena event (NPE). The review was conducted in July and August 2013 by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, which is within the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations performed this

233

Peer Review of NRC Standardized Plant Analysis Risk Models  

SciTech Connect

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Standardized Plant Analysis Risk (SPAR) Models underwent a Peer Review using ASME PRA standard (Addendum C) as endorsed by NRC in Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.200. The review was performed by a mix of industry probabilistic risk analysis (PRA) experts and NRC PRA experts. Representative SPAR models, one PWR and one BWR, were reviewed against Capability Category I of the ASME PRA standard. Capability Category I was selected as the basis for review due to the specific uses/applications of the SPAR models. The BWR SPAR model was reviewed against 331 ASME PRA Standard Supporting Requirements; however, based on the Capability Category I level of review and the absence of internal flooding and containment performance (LERF) logic only 216 requirements were determined to be applicable. Based on the review, the BWR SPAR model met 139 of the 216 supporting requirements. The review also generated 200 findings or suggestions. Of these 200 findings and suggestions 142 were findings and 58 were suggestions. The PWR SPAR model was also evaluated against the same 331 ASME PRA Standard Supporting Requirements. Of these requirements only 215 were deemed appropriate for the review (for the same reason as noted for the BWR). The PWR review determined that 125 of the 215 supporting requirements met Capability Category I or greater. The review identified 101 findings or suggestions (76 findings and 25 suggestions). These findings or suggestions were developed to identify areas where SPAR models could be enhanced. A process to prioritize and incorporate the findings/suggestions supporting requirements into the SPAR models is being developed. The prioritization process focuses on those findings that will enhance the accuracy, completeness and usability of the SPAR models.

Anthony Koonce; James Knudsen; Robert Buell

2011-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

234

Independent technical review of the Pinellas Plant  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report documents an Independent Technical Review (ITR) of facilities, organizations, plans, activities and various other elements required to successfully transition the Pinellas Plant from Defense Program (DP) funded operation to either community developed reuse or safe deactivation leading to decontamination and decommissioning (D&D). The review was conducted at the request of the Department of Energy (DOE) Deputy Assistant Secretary for Facility Transition and Management (EM-60) and is a consensus of the nine member ITR Team.

Not Available

1994-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

235

Fiscal Year 2011 Water Power Program Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review » Fiscal Peer Review » Fiscal Year 2011 Water Power Program Peer Review Fiscal Year 2011 Water Power Program Peer Review In November 2011, the Water Power Program held their Annual Peer Review Meeting in Alexandria, Virginia. The purpose of the meeting was to evaluate DOE-funded hydropower and marine and hydrokinetic R&D projects for their contribution to the mission and goals of the Water Power Program and to assess progress made against stated objectives. At the review, approximately 85 projects were presented, representing a DOE investment of over $100 million over the last few years. In addition to the formal review, this event was an excellent opportunity for the water power community to share ideas and solutions to address challenges facing the hydropower and marine and hydrokinetic energy industries.

236

Independent technical review of the Mound Plant  

SciTech Connect

This report documents an Independent Technical Review (ITR) of the facilities, organizations, plans, and activities required to transition particular elements of the Mound Plant from Defense Program (DP) funded operation as appropriate either to community developed reuse or safe deactivation leading to decontamination and decommissioning (D&D). The review was conducted at the request of the Dr. Willis Bixby, Deputy Assistant Secretary, U.S. Department of Energy EM-60, Office of Facility Transition and Management and is a consensus of the nine member ITR Team. Information for the review was drawn from documents provided to the ITR Team by the Miamisburg Area Office (MB) of the DOE, EG&G, the City of Miamisburg, and others; and from presentations, discussions, interviews, and facility inspections at the Mound Plant during the weeks of March 14 and March 28, 1994. During the week of April 25, 1994, the ITR Team met at Los Alamos, New Mexico to develop consensus recommendations. A presentation of the core recommendations was made at the Mound Plant on May 5, 1994. This is an independent assessment of information available to, and used by, the Mound Plant personnel. Repetition of the information is not meant to imply discovery by the ITR Team. Team members, however, acting as independent reviewers, frequently assess the information from a perspective that differs significantly from that of the Mound Plant personnel. The report is based on information obtained and conditions observed during the March 1994 review interval. The ITR process and normal site work often initiate rapid, beneficial changes in understanding and organization immediately following the review. These changes frequently alter conditions observed during the review, but the report does not address changes subsequent to the review interval.

1994-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

237

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2010 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document summarizes the comments provided by peer reviewers on hydrogen and fuel cell projects presented at the FY 2010 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), held June 7-11, 2010 in Washington, D.C.

Not Available

2010-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

238

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Modeling - Mario Martinez, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Flow Battery Modeling Energy Storage Systems Peer Review September 26-28, 2012 MJ Martinez (PI), J Clausen, SM Davison, HK Moffat Flow Battery Modeling Schematic of a Flow Battery PURPOSE: The flow battery modeling task seeks to improve fundamental understanding and enable high-performing, low-cost designs of flow batteries through

239

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Membrane - David Ofer, Tiax  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Flow Battery Membrane Flow Battery Membrane Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) Peer Review and Update Meeting 2012 Jack Treger treger.jack@tiaxllc.com Washington DC, September 27, 2012 Flow Battery Membrane Background and Purpose 1 Vanadium redox batteries (VRB) for energy storage require improved ion- selective membranes. * Vanadium permeation across current membranes leads to self-discharge and decreases cycling efficiency: - Negative half cell: V 2+ V 3+ + e - E o = -0.255V - Positive half cell: e - + VO 2 + + 2H + VO 2+ + H 2 O E o = 1.00V . * Current perfluorosulfonic acid polymer membranes are costly. * TIAX is developing a novel composite bipolar membrane: - Composite anionic membrane minimizes content of costly perfluorosulfonic acid polymer - Made bipolar by a cationic surface layer to improve selectivity for

240

FY2002 ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS PEER REVIEW AGENDA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS RESEARCH PROGRAM ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS RESEARCH PROGRAM ANNUAL PEER REVIEW November 2-3, 2006 Washington Marriott Hotel, Washington, DC (USA) AGENDA Thursday, November 2, 2004 7:45 AM Continental Breakfast 8:30 Welcome and Overview - Dr. Imre Gyuk, DOE 8:40 DOE Perspective - DOE 9:00 ESS Program Overview - John Boyes, Sandia National Laboratories 9:20 NAS Battery Performance at Charleston, WV - Ali Nourai, AEP Corp. (Funded in part by the Energy Storage Systems Program of the U.S. Department Of Energy (DOE/ESS) through Sandia National Laboratories (SNL). 9:40 Evaluation of the Kauai Island Utility Co-operative System for Energy storage Potential - Abbas Akhil, Sandia National Laboratories (Funded by the Kauai Island Utility Co-0p). 10:00 Iowa Stored Energy Plant - Bob Haug, Iowa Stored Energy Plant Agency

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 DOE Energy Storage Program 6 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER REVIEW John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories ESS Program Makeup ESS Base Program - CEC/DOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - NYSERDA/DOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - Boeing Superconducting Flywheel - ACONF Coast Guard Project - HybSim Hybrid Storage Model Development Congressionally-Directed Programs - University of Missouri-Rolla - Grid Modernization - Iowa Stored Energy Project - EEI - BiPolar Ni-MH Battery Development - Sprint - Storage for Telecommunications Apps. - Emerson - Network Power - Beacon Power - Frequency Regulation Plant Design - Mead Westvaco - Research on Lead-Carbon Asymmetric Super capacitors (FY05) ESS Program Makeup (cont.) ESS Program Makeup cont. SBIR - Aegis Technology - PII - Arkansas Power Electronic International -

242

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 DOE Energy Storage 9 DOE Energy Storage PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Mission Develop advanced electricity storage and PE technologies, in partnership with industry, for modernizing and expanding the electric supply. This will improve the quality, reliability, flexibility and cost effectiveness of the existing system. Help create an energy storage industry Significant Events in FY09 Power Electronics Subprogram suffered a large budget cut in FY09 and was dropped as a separate program for FY10. ESSP will reabsorb power electronics development for energy storage applications back into program. Funding Due to a lengthy Congressional continuing resolution, FY09 funding was not received until April Power Electronics Sub-Program ESSP Program Highlights

243

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Second Afternoon Session  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Second Afternoon Second Afternoon Session 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Second Afternoon Session The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from the second Day 2 afternoon session are below. Moderator: Eric Lightner, DOE 2012 SG Peer Review - Demonstration of a Coordinated and Integrated System - Bill Becker, Spirae 2012 SG Peer Review - Interoperability of Demand Response Resources in New York - Andre Wellington, ConEd NY 2012 SG Peer Review - Dramatic Residential Demand Reduction in the Desert Southwest - Robert Boehm, Univ. of Nevada, Las Vegas

244

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Smart Grid Panel  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Smart Grid Panel Smart Grid Panel Discussion 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Smart Grid Panel Discussion The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from the Day 2 Smart Grid panel discussion are below. Moderator: Lee Kreval, SDG&E 2012 SG Peer Review - Day 2 Panel Discussion: Puesh Kumar, American Public Power Association 2012 SG Peer Review - Day 2 Panel Discussion: Rogelio Sullivan, NC State University 2012 SG Peer Review - Day 2 Panel Discussion: Matt Wakefield, EPRI More Documents & Publications Smart Grid Characteristics, Values, and Metrics

245

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 First Afternoon Session |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

First Afternoon First Afternoon Session 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 First Afternoon Session The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from the first Day 2 afternoon session are below. Moderator: Dan Ton, DOE 2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: LIPA Smart Energy Corridor Project - Ming Mui, LIPA 2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: Enhanced Demand and Distribution Management Regional Demonstration - Craig Miller, NRECA 2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: NSTAR Automated Mater Reading Based Dynamic Pricing - Douglas Horton, NSTAR Electric & Gas

246

Non-Destructive Examination Independent Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

webcast Webcast Waiver Contacts Home webcast Webcast Waiver Contacts Home The Department of Energy is hosting a Non-Destructive Examination Independent Review in Atlanta, GA The Independent Review of Non-Destructive Examination Techniques and Methods for Application to High Level Waste Tank Storage will be conducted to evaluate recent developments in NDE equipment and how they might be applied to the unique conditions of high-level waste tanks. This review will provide a forum for experts from academia and industry to provide recommendations for cost effective NDE of both the tank steel and concrete materials. Participation in the Review is open to anyone interested in NDE techniques for waste tanks, including interested participants from industry and vendors, who will be invited to make presentations of recent improvements to equipment. The Review will also present a platform for discussion of the underlying philosophy of the use of NDE in an in-service inspection program. The use of statistical methods to evaluate the accuracy and disposition the results will also be discussed. From this, recommendations will be made for the NDE inspection program.

247

Thermophysical properties of uranium dioxide - Version 0 for peer review  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Data on thermophysical properties of solid and liquid UO{sub 2} have been reviewed and critically assessed to obtain consistent thermophysical property recommendations for inclusion in the International Nuclear Safety Center Database on the World Wide Web (http://www.insc.anl.gov.). Thermodynamic properties that have been assessed are enthalpy, heat capacity, melting point, enthalpy of fusion, thermal expansion, density, surface tension, and vapor pressure. Transport properties that have been assessed are thermal conductivity, thermal diffusivity, viscosity, and emissivity. Summaries of the recommendations with uncertainties and detailed assessments for each property are included in this report and in the International Nuclear Safety Center Database for peer review. The assessments includes a review of the experiments and data, an examination of previous recommendations, the basis for selecting recommendations, a determination of uncertainties, and a comparison of recommendations with data and with previous recommendations. New data and research that have led to new recommendations include thermal expansion and density measurements of solid and liquid UO{sub 2}, derivation of physically-based equations for the thermal conductivity of solid UO{sub 2}, measurements of the heat capacity of liquid UO{sub 2}, and measurements and analysis of the thermal conductivity of liquid UO{sub 2}.

Fink, J.K.; Petri, M.C.

1997-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

248

Independent Oversight Review, Y-12 National Security Complex...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Y-12 National Security Complex - June 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Y-12 National Security Complex - June 2012 June 2012 Review of the Y-12 Implementation Verification Review...

249

Radiography Facility - Building 239 Independent Validation Review  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this task was to perform an Independent Validation Review to evaluate the successful implementation and effectiveness of Safety Basis controls, including new and revised controls, to support the implementation of a new DSA/TSR for B239. This task addresses Milestone 2 of FY10 PEP 7.6.6. As the first IVR ever conducted on a LLNL nuclear facility, it was designated a pilot project. The review follows the outline developed for Milestone 1 of the PEP, which is based on the DOE Draft Guide for Performance of Independent Verification Review of Safety Basis Controls. A formal Safety Basis procedure will be developed later, based on the lessons learned with this pilot project. Note, this review is termed a ''Validation'' in order to be consistent with the PEP definition and address issues historically raised about verification mechanisms at LLNL. Validation is intended to confirm that implementing mechanisms realistically establish the ability of TSR LCO, administrative control or safety management program to accomplish its intended safety function and that the controls are being implemented. This effort should not, however, be confused with a compliance assessment against all relevant DOE requirements and national standards. Nor is it used as a vehicle to question the derivation of controls already approved by LSO unless a given TSR statement simply cannot be implemented as stated.

Altenbach, T J; Beaulieu, R A; Watson, J F; Wong, H J

2010-02-02T23:59:59.000Z

250

Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management - February 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management - February 2012 February 2012 Review of the Implementation Verification Review Processes at the Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management for Building 3019 This report documents the independent review of implementation verification review (IVR) processes at the Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management (ORO-EM) conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review involved evaluation of established IVR processes and implementation of the newly revised documented safety analysis (DSA) and technical safety

251

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2005 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2005 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 23-26, 2005, in Arlington, Virginia. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Chalk, S. G.

2005-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

252

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2006 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2006 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 16-19, 2006, in Arlington, Virginia. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Milliken, J.

2006-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

253

Peer review and over-competitive research funding fostering mainstream opinion to monopoly. Part II  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In our previous work (Scientometrics 87:293---301, 2011), a numerical model of over-competitive research funding in "peer-group-assessed-grant-based-funding-system" was proposed and the process was firstly investigated quantitatively. The simulation ... Keywords: 60H99, C15, C32, Cosmology, Excessive competition, Mainstream, Peer review, Publications, Research funding

Xuan Zhen Liu; Hui Fang

2012-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

254

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Agenda/Presentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

& Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Agenda/Presentation List Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Agenda/Presentation List The 2008 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) was held in Washington DC on Sept. 29-30, 2008. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. The 2008 agenda was composed of 28 projects that covered a broad range of new and ongoing, state-of-the-art, energy storage and power electronics technologies, including updates on the collaborations among DOE/ESPE, CEC in California, and NYSERDA in New York. The agenda & project list is below. Presentations Energy Storage Systems (ESS) presentations Power Electronics (PE) Systems presentations

255

Independent Oversight Review, Pantex Plant, December 2013 | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Pantex Plant, December 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Pantex Plant, December 2013 December 2013 Targeted Review of the Safety Significant Blast Door and Personnel Door...

256

Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Site Waste Treatment and...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant, August 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant, August 2013 August 2013 Review of the...

257

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site Salt Waste...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility - August 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility - August 2013 August 2013 Review...

258

2012 SG Peer Review - Integrated Smart Distribution RD&D Project...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2012 Smart Grid R&D Program Peer Review Meeting DOE - Integrated Smart Distribution RD&D Project S. S. (Mani) Venkata Alstom Grid June 7, 2012 December 2008 DOE Integrated Smart...

259

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July 2013 July 2013 Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Livermore Field Office (LFO) and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Site 200 preparedness for severe natural phenomena events (NPEs). The HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations performed this review to evaluate the processes for identifying emergency response capabilities and

260

2013 Transmission Reliability R&D Peer Review Presentations Available |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 Transmission Reliability R&D Peer Review Presentations 3 Transmission Reliability R&D Peer Review Presentations Available 2013 Transmission Reliability R&D Peer Review Presentations Available September 9, 2013 - 3:25pm Addthis The agendas and presentations from the June and August 2013 Transmission Reliability R&D Program reviews are now available for download. The June 27-28 Transmission Reliability Program review combined the North American Synchrophasor Initiative (NASPI) and Advanced Application Development subprograms. The 2-day review included an overview of the program and six sessions of presentations from researchers funded by OE. The NASPI working group addresses the installation of synchrophasor networks across the United States with Recovery Act Smart Grid Investment Grant funds. Advanced Application Development projects include

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Independent Oversight Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 Independent Oversight Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 May 2013 Lessons Learned from Targeted Reviews of Implementation Verification Review Processes at Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities This report summarizes and analyzes the results of independent reviews of IVR and associated processes at eight DOE sites conducted by Independent Oversight from August 2011 to September 2012. The purpose of the Independent Oversight review was to evaluate the processes and methods used for verifying the implementation of safety basis hazard controls and periodically re-verifying that the controls remain in place. Independent Oversight Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 More Documents & Publications Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Site CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation

262

Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 2013 March 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - March 2013 March 2013 Review of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Construction Quality The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, conducted an independent review of selected aspects of construction quality at the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP). The review, which was performed November 26-30, 2012, was the latest in a series of ongoing quarterly assessments of construction quality performed by Independent Oversight at the WTP construction site. Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - March 2013

263

Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Treatment and Immobilization Treatment and Immobilization Plant - November 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - November 2011 November 2011 Review of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project Construction Quality The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security conducted an independent review of selected aspects of construction quality at the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project (WTP). The independent oversight review, which was performed September 12-15, 2011, was the latest in a series of ongoing quarterly assessments of construction quality at the WTP construction site. Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant -

264

Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 2012 October 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - October 2012 October 2012 Review of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Construction Quality The U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, conducted an independent review of selected aspects of construction quality at the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP). The review, which was performed August 6-10, 2012, was the latest in a series of ongoing quarterly assessments of construction quality performed by Independent Oversight at the WTP construction site. Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant -

265

Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Office of River  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Office of River Protection - December 2010 Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Office of River Protection - December 2010 December 2010 Specific Administrative Controls Review with the Office of Environmental Management at the Office of River Protection The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, participated in an Office of Environmental Management Office of Standards and Quality Assurance, EM-23, review of Specific Administrative Controls (SAC). The EM-23 review included selected Office of River Protection programs at the Hanford Site. Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Office of River Protection - December 2010 More Documents & Publications Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Operations

266

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - September 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Savannah River Site - September 2011 Savannah River Site - September 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - September 2011 September 2011 Review of the Implementation Verification Review Processes at the Savannah River Site Environmental Management Nuclear Facilities The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the Implementation Verification Review (IVR) Processes at Savannah River Site Environmental Management Nuclear Facilities. The overall objective of the Independent Oversight IVR review process includes verification that contractors and site offices have developed and implemented appropriate methods for performing IVRs (including direction for scheduling and conducting IVR activities) and measurement of the

267

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - September 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - September 2011 September 2011 Review of the Implementation Verification Review Processes at the Savannah River Site Environmental Management Nuclear Facilities The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the Implementation Verification Review (IVR) Processes at Savannah River Site Environmental Management Nuclear Facilities. The overall objective of the Independent Oversight IVR review process includes verification that contractors and site offices have developed and implemented appropriate methods for performing IVRs (including direction for scheduling and conducting IVR activities) and measurement of the

268

Heavy Vehicle Materials Program 2005 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

MERIT REVIEW & PEER EVALUATION REPORT MERIT REVIEW & PEER EVALUATION REPORT HEAVY VEHICLE MATERIALS PROGRAM Less dependence on foreign oil, and eventual transition to an emissions-free, petroleum-free vehicle F r e e d o m C A r A n d V e h i C l e T e C h n o l o g i e s P r o g r A m Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 November 2005 Dear Colleague: This document summarizes the comments provided by the Review Panel for the FY 2005 Department of Energy (DOE) Heavy Vehicle Materials Program Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, held September 13-15, 2005 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The goal of this document is to provide the reader with a summary of the comments and scores from expert reviewers from industry and government on these Materials Technologies projects.

269

Responsible Authorship and Peer Review James R. Wilson  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of cold fusion is a striking illustration of what happens when scientists circumvent the normal peer and resources to show that there is no convincing evidence for room-temperature fusion. Much of this effort would not have been necessary had normal scientific procedures been followed. --John R. Huizenga, Cold

270

Full Economic Costing:-Updated guidance notes for peer reviewers  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

the level of resources required to undertake the project and not their unit cost. In particular, peer are as follows: 1) Directly Incurred costs: These are costs which are specific to a project and will be charged to the project on the basis of actual costs incurred. They must be supported by an audit record, which

271

Independent Oversight Review, Idaho National Laboratory - July 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Review, Idaho National Laboratory - July 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Idaho National Laboratory - July 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Idaho National Laboratory - July 2012 July 2012 Review of Site Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Idaho National Laboratory The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the Department of Energy (DOE) Idaho National Laboratory (INL) preparedness for severe natural phenomena events. The HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations performed this review to evaluate the processes for identifying emergency response capabilities and maintaining them in a state of readiness in case of a severe natural phenomena event. Independent Oversight Review, Idaho National Laboratory - July 2012

272

Independent Oversight Review, Argonne National Laboratory - November...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- November 2011 November 2011 Review of the Argonne National Laboratory Alpha-Gamma Hot Cell Facility Readiness Assessment (Implementation Verification Review Sections) This...

273

Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - May 2013 May 2013 Review of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Construction Quality The U.S....

274

Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - March 2013 March 2013 Review of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Construction Quality The U.S....

275

Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - March 2012 March 2012 Review of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project Construction Quality The...

276

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

a review of nuclear safety programs at the DOE Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) from October through November 2009. The review was performed by the HSS Office of...

277

Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Tank Farms - December 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 2012 December 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Tank Farms - December 2012 December 2012 Review of the Hanford Tank Farms Radiological Controls Activity-Level Implementation This report documents an independent review by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) of radiological protection program (RPP) activity-level implementation at the Hanford Tank Farms. The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations. The purpose of this Independent Oversight targeted review effort is to evaluate the flowdown of occupational radiation protection requirements, as expressed in facility RPPs, to work planning, control, and execution processes, such as

278

Microsoft Word - ASME FY08 Fuel Cell Peer Review Report_FINAL.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Meeting Host Organization Technology & Management Services, Inc. Steven T. Ostheim (412) 386-6485 Review Panel AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS Minking K. Chyu, Chair, Peer Review Panel Richard Laudenat, Chair, Peer Review Executive Committee Michael Tinkleman, Director, Research ASME Center for Research and Technology Development (202) 785-7394 Meeting Facilitator and Final Report Ross Brindle, Energetics Incorporated (410) 953-6239 Work Done Under Prime Contract Number DE-AC26-05NT41816 (Subtask 305.01.02.3) FINAL REPORT 2008 STRATEGIC CENTER FOR COAL FUEL CELL PROGRAM PEER REVIEW MEETING Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania April 21-25, 2008 MEETING SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT José D. Figueroa NETL Project Manager and Meeting Coordinator

279

Independent Oversight Review, Pantex Plant - February 2012 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Plant - February 2012 Plant - February 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Pantex Plant - February 2012 February 2012 Review of the Pantex Plant Implementation Verification Review Processes This report documents the independent review of implementation verification review (IVR) processes at the Pantex Plant conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), which is within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations from January 17 to 24, 2012. The overall purpose of these Independent Oversight reviews is to evaluate the processes and methods used for verifying and re-verifying implementation of new or substantially revised safety basis hazard controls. Independent Oversight Review, Pantex Plant - February 2012

280

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2006 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2006 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 16-19, 2006, in Arlington, Virginia. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Milliken, J.

2006-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2005 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2005 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 23-26, 2005, in Arlington, Virginia. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Chalk, S. G.

2005-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

282

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2007 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 14-18, 2007, in Washington, D.C. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Milliken, J.

2007-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

283

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2007 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 14-18, 2007, in Washington, D.C. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Milliken, J.

2007-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

284

Independent Oversight Review, Idaho National Laboratory - September...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Evaluations within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) performed an initial independent assessment of the Battelle Energy...

285

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - April 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Laboratory - Laboratory - April 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - April 2012 April 2012 Review of the Consequence Assessment Program at the Los Alamos National Laboratory The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, conducted an independent review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) emergency management consequence assessment program. The purpose of the review was to measure LANL's compliance against U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) orders and LANL institutional requirements. The review scope was coordinated with the Los Alamos Site Office (LASO), and the review was conducted February 7-9, 2012. LANL's consequence assessment process ensures that estimates of onsite

286

Independent Oversight Review, Nevada National Security - May 2013 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Security - May 2013 National Security - May 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Nevada National Security - May 2013 May 2013 Review of the Nevada National Security Site Criticality Safety Program Corrective Action Plan Closure The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, conducted an independent review of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Nevada Field Office (NFO) and National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec) concurrent assessments to confirm the level of compliance with the closure actions of the NSTec corrective action plan (CAP) for nuclear criticality safety. Independent Oversight Review, Nevada National Security - May 2013 More Documents & Publications

287

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory- December 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review of the Independent Integrated Safety Management/Integrated Work Management Assessment of Research and Development and Programmatic Work at the Los Alamos National Laboratory

288

Review of the Independent Integrated Safety Management/Integrated...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Los Alamos Site Office NNSA National Nuclear Security Administration PIC Person In Charge R&D Research and Development TA Technical Area 1 Independent Oversight Review of the...

289

Distributed Hydrogen Production from Natural Gas: Independent Review  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Independent review report on the available information concerning the technologies needed for forecourts producing 150 kg/day of hydrogen from natural gas.

Fletcher, J.; Callaghan, V.

2006-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

290

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient Product Procurement Portfolio  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Energy-Efficient Product Procurement (EEPP) Portfolio Meeting: Washington D.C., Dec. 4, 2012 Reviewers: David Goldstein (Chair), Harvey Sachs, Cyndi Vallina, Marina Moses, and Shahzeen Attari Review: Jan. 25, 2013 Summary The Review Committee met in Washington, D.C., and engaged in a day-long discussion with FEMP EEPP staff and contractors. Program staff gave clear and effective presentations, and we had extensive and illuminating discussions with the staff, and to a limited extent with other interested parties who attended. The Committee worked together after the meeting and by email to produce this review. Our review addresses: * strategic issues with respect to the program,

291

Independent Oversight Review, Paducah Site - April 2013 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Paducah Site - April 2013 Paducah Site - April 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Paducah Site - April 2013 April 2013 Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Paducah Site The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Paducah site's preparedness for severe natural phenomena events (NPEs). The HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations performed this review to evaluate the processes for identifying emergency response capabilities and maintaining them in a state of readiness in case of a severe NPE. Independent Oversight Review, Paducah Site - April 2013 More Documents & Publications Independent Oversight Review, Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant -

292

Independent Oversight Focused Review, Kansas City Plant, Summary Report -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Focused Review, Kansas City Plant, Summary Independent Oversight Focused Review, Kansas City Plant, Summary Report - December 2001 Independent Oversight Focused Review, Kansas City Plant, Summary Report - December 2001 December 2001 Focused Review of Environment, Safety and Health and Emergency Management at the Kansas City Plant The Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA) conducted a focused review of environment, safety, and health (ES&H) and emergency management programs at the Kansas City Plant (KCP) in November 2001. Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations and Office of Emergency Management Oversight performed the review as a joint effort. As discussed in this report, KCP has a good safety and environmental

293

Independent Oversight Focus Area Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - April  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Focus Area Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - Independent Oversight Focus Area Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - April 2010 Independent Oversight Focus Area Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - April 2010 April 2010 Review of Specific Administrative Controls at DOE Nuclear Facilities The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health Safety and Security occasionally reviews specific focus areas. Focus areas are aspects of safety programs that Independent Oversight determines warrant increased management attention based on reviews of performance data, inspection results, and operating experience across DOE sites. Due, in part, to operating experience and previous inspection results. DOE selected specific administrative controls (SACs) as a focus area. SACs are new or revised technical safety requirements (TSRs)

294

Independent Oversight Followup Review, Idaho National Laboratory...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the validity of the FCF safety basis documentation. The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) fulfilled this objective by reviewing the draft Safety Analysis Report...

295

Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - October 2012 October 2012 Review of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Construction Quality The U. S....

296

Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - November 2011 November 2011 Review of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project Construction Quality The...

297

Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - August 2011 August 2011 Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Construction Quality The Office of Safety...

298

Non-Destructive Examination Independent Review  

This review will provide a forum for experts from academia and industry to provide recommendations for cost effective NDE of both the tank steel and concrete materials.

299

Independent Oversight Review, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Laboratory - October 2012 October 2012 Review of the Department of Energy Office of Science Assessment of the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Radiochemical...

300

Independent Oversight Review, Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Review, Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Independent Oversight Review, Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site - March 2000 Independent Oversight Review, Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site - March 2000 March 2000 Review of the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site Transportation Emergency Management Program The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Emergency Management Oversight, within the Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance, conducted a transportation emergency management review and a follow-up review of the emergency management program at Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS) in February 2000. The primary purpose of this review was to assess the effectiveness of the Department's emergency management programs for transportation events involving hazardous materials (not related to transuranic waste or nuclear

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Independent Oversight Follow-Up Review, Hanford Site - June 2005 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Follow-Up Review, Hanford Site - June 2005 Independent Oversight Follow-Up Review, Hanford Site - June 2005 Independent Oversight Follow-Up Review, Hanford Site - June 2005 June 2005 Review of Worker Vapor Exposures and Occupational Medicine Program at the Hanford Site, June 2005 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA) conducted a follow-up review in May-June 2005 of its 2004 investigation of allegations of deficiencies in worker protection and medical practices at the DOE Hanford Site. The purpose of this OA follow-up review was to assess the status of the corrective actions for selected findings identified by OA during its 2004 investigation. This OA review did not result in any new findings. Recommendations for continued improvement and enhancements to ongoing initiatives are provided

302

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - July 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Los Alamos National Laboratory - July Los Alamos National Laboratory - July 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - July 2012 July 2012 Review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Implementation Verification Review at Technical Area-55 This report documents the independent review of the implementation verification review (IVR) process at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) plutonium facility at Technical Area-55 (TA-55) conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), which is within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations from May 1 - 17, 2012. Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - July 2012 More Documents & Publications

303

Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - January 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oak Ridge National Laboratory - Oak Ridge National Laboratory - January 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - January 2013 January 2013 Review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor Implementation Verification Review Processes This report documents the independent review of Implementation Verification Review (IVR) processes at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), which is within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations during the periods of August 20-24 and September 25-28, 2012. Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - January 2013 More Documents & Publications

304

Independent Oversight Review, Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review, Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Review, Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project - April 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project - April 2013 April 2013 Review of Radiation Protection Program Implementation at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project of the Idaho Site This report documents an independent review of activity-level radiation protection program (RPP) implementation at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) of the Idaho Site, as conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations. The purpose of this Independent Oversight targeted review

305

Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - January 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oak Ridge National Laboratory - Oak Ridge National Laboratory - January 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - January 2013 January 2013 Review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor Implementation Verification Review Processes This report documents the independent review of Implementation Verification Review (IVR) processes at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), which is within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations during the periods of August 20-24 and September 25-28, 2012. Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - January 2013 More Documents & Publications

306

2012 SG Peer Review - CERTS Microgrid Test Bed - Joe Eto, LBNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Peer Review Meeting Peer Review Meeting The CERTS Microgrid Test Bed g Joe Eto Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 7 June 2012 The CERTS Microgrid Test Bed Objective To lower the cost and improve the performance of clusters of smaller distributed energy resources and loads when operated in an integrated manner when operated in an integrated manner, i.e., as microgrids Life-cycle Funding Summary ($K) Prior to FY12, FY13, Out-year(s) Technical Scope The CERTS Microgrid Test Bed is being expanded through the addition of new hardware elements: 1) a CERTS- compatible conventional synchronous generator ; 2) an FY 12 , authorized , requested y ( ) 2500K 1000K 1000K 2500K energy management system relying on software as a service (SaaS) for dispatch; 3) a commercially available, stand-alone

307

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: Irvine Smart Grid Demonstration Project - Ardalan Kemiab, Southern California Edison  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Peer Review Meeting Peer Review Meeting Irvine Smart Grid Demonstration (ISGD) ( ) Ed Kamiab Southern California Edison (SCE) 6/8/2012 ISGD Objective SCE' I i S t G id D t ti (ISGD) ill (Insert graphic here) SCE's Irvine Smart Grid Demonstration (ISGD) will demonstrate an integrated, scalable Smart Grid system that includes many of the interlocking pieces of an end- to-end Smart Grid system, from the transmission and distrib tion s stems to cons mer applications s ch as distribution systems to consumer applications such as smart appliances and plug-in electric vehicles. Life-cycle Funding ($K) FY2010 FY2015 1. Energy Smart Customer Devices 2 Year 2020 Distribution System Technical Scope FY2010 - FY2015 $39,612 2. Year 2020 Distribution System 3. Interoperability & Cyber Security 4. Workforce of the Future

308

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - December  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - December 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - December 2011 December 2011 Review of the Independent Integrated Safety Management/Integrated Work Management Assessment of Research and Development and Programmatic Work at the Los Alamos National Laboratory The purpose of this Independent Oversight review by the Office of Health, Safety and Security's (HSS) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (Independent Oversight) was (through shadowing1) to determine the depth, breath, and rigor of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) independent integrated safety management/integrated work management (ISM/IWM) assessment activities at the LANL Plutonium Facility at Technical Area (TA)-55 conducted July 18 through August 19, 2011, and to maintain

309

Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - March 2012 March 2012 Review of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project Construction Quality The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, conducted an independent review of selected aspects of construction quality at the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP). The review, which was performed November 14-17, 2011, was the latest in a series of ongoing quarterly assessments of construction quality performed by Independent Oversight at the WTP construction site. Independent Oversight determined that construction quality at WTP was adequate in the areas reviewed. BNI Engineering has developed appropriate

310

Independent Oversight Review, Argonne National Laboratory - November 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review, Argonne National Laboratory - Review, Argonne National Laboratory - November 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Argonne National Laboratory - November 2011 November 2011 Review of the Argonne National Laboratory Alpha-Gamma Hot Cell Facility Readiness Assessment (Implementation Verification Review Sections) This report documents the review of the Alpha-Gamma Hot Cell Facility (AGHCF) readiness assessment (RA) by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The overall objectives of the IVR assessments include verification that contractors and site offices have procedures and processes for scheduling and conducting IVR activities in place and have developed and implemented appropriate methods for performing implementation

311

Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2013 January 2013 Review of the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Black-Cell and Hard-To-Reach Pipe Spools Procurement Process and the Office of River...

312

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site Tritium Facilities -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Tritium Tritium Facilities - December 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site Tritium Facilities - December 2012 December 2012 Review of Site Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Savannah River Site Tritium Facilities The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of preparedness for severe natural phenomena events (NPEs) at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Savannah River Site's (SRS's) Tritium Facilities (TF). The HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations performed this review to evaluate the processes for identifying emergency response capabilities and maintaining them in a state of readiness in case of a severe NPE.

313

Independent Oversight Follow-up Review, Savannah River National Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Savannah River National Savannah River National Laboratory - January 2012 Independent Oversight Follow-up Review, Savannah River National Laboratory - January 2012 January 2012 Follow-up Review of Implementation Verification Reviews at the Savannah River National Laboratory Savannah River Site The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the identification and implementation of safety basis hazard controls associated with "flashing spray release" and supporting information documented in the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) WSRC-SA-2, SRNL Technical Area Documented Safety Analysis, Revision 10; WSRC-TS-97-00014, SRNL Technical Area Technical Safety Requirements,

314

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2011 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document summarizes the comments provided by peer reviewers on hydrogen and fuel cell projects presented at the FY 2011 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), held May 9-13, 2011 in Arlington, Virginia

Satypal, S.

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

315

Independent Oversight Targeted Review, Y-12 National Security Complex -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Targeted Review, Y-12 National Security Targeted Review, Y-12 National Security Complex - February 2012 Independent Oversight Targeted Review, Y-12 National Security Complex - February 2012 February 2012 Targeted Review of Site Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Y-12 National Security Complex This report documents the independent targeted review of the Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12) preparedness for severe natural phenomena events, conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations and was carried out as the pilot for similar reviews at other U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) sites. The purpose of the targeted review

316

Advanced Combustion Engine Program 2005 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Less dependence on foreign oil, and eventual transition to an emissions-free, petroleum-free vehicle ADVANCED COMBUSTION ENGINE PROGRAM F r e e d o m C A r A n d V e h i C l e T e C h n o l o g i e s P r o g r A m MERIT REVIEW & PEER EVALUATION REPORT Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 October 5, 2005 Dear Colleague: This document summarizes the comments provided by the Review Panel for the FY 2005 Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Combustion Engine R&D Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, the "ACE Review," held on April 19-21, 2005 at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). The raw evaluations and comments of the panel were provided (with reviewers' names deleted) to the presenters in early June and were used by national laboratory researchers in the development of Annual Operating Plans (AOPs) for fiscal year (FY) 2006. The panel's

317

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - December  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - December 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - December 2013 December 2013 Review of the Technical Area 55 Safety Class Fire Suppression System at Los Alamos National Laboratory This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Technical Area 55 Plutonium Facility safety class fire suppression system (FSS), concurrent with a scheduled Los Alamos Field Office vital safety system assessment. The review was performed April 29 through May 20, 2013, by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, which is within the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security. The

318

Independent Oversight Review, Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant - April  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April 2013 April 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant - April 2013 April 2013 Review of the Integrated Safety Management System Phase I Verification Review at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office (PPPO). The objective of the Independent Oversight review was to evaluate PPPO's conduct of the Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) Phase I verification review at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PORTS). The contractor at PORTS is Fluor-Babcock & Wilcox Portsmouth (FBP). The HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations

319

Independent Oversight Review, Idaho Site - November 2011 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site - November 2011 Site - November 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Idaho Site - November 2011 November 2011 Review of Implementation Verification Review Processes at the Idaho Site - Phase 1 of 2 This report documents the first phase of an independent review of implementation verification review (IVR) processes at the Idaho Site conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The purpose of the complete Independent Oversight review is to evaluate, in two phases, the processes and methods used at the Idaho Site for verifying implementation of new or substantially revised facility safety basis hazard controls. The objective of this Phase 1 assessment was to evaluate the extent to which the Idaho Operations Office (DOE-ID) and primary facility

320

Independent Oversight Review, Idaho Site, March 2013 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site, March 2013 Site, March 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Idaho Site, March 2013 March 2013 Review of the Facility Representative Program at the Idaho Site The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed an independent review of the Facility Representative (FR) program at the Idaho Site. The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations by shadowing a DOE Idaho Operations Office (DOE-ID) assessment team during its periodic self-assessment of the program. The purpose of this Independent Oversight review effort was to evaluate the FR program and FR self-assessment methodology implemented at the Idaho Site. This review was performed at the Idaho Site from November 13 to 16, 2012.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Smart Grid R&D Program Peer Review June 7-8, 2012 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Grid R&D Program Peer Review June 7-8, 2012 Grid R&D Program Peer Review June 7-8, 2012 Smart Grid R&D Program Peer Review June 7-8, 2012 May 10, 2012 - 11:53am Addthis The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability will hold its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects will be presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. A draft agenda and online registration are available. In conjunction with the peer review, the Smart Grid R&D Program will hold a discussion forum for principle investigators of current projects and select smart grid experts on June 6, 2012. Input on current capabilities and gap areas in need of future R&D will be used to update the Multi-Year Program Plan.

322

ForPeerReview Microbiology and performance of a methanogenic biofilm reactor during the1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

: Biofilm, Anaerobic digestion, Bioreactor start-up, Microbial population21 dynamics, Methanogenesis-00615442,version1-19Aug2011 #12;ForPeerReview 3 Introduction1 Anaerobic digestion is an effective method). The limitation of4 anaerobic digestion processes resides in the duration and instability of their transitory

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

323

The convergence of digital libraries and the peer-review process  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Pre-print repositories have seen a significant increase in use over the past fifteen years across multiple research domains. Researchers are beginning to develop applications capable of using these repositories to assist the scientific community above ... Keywords: OAI-PMH, Open Archives Initiative, peer-review process, pre-print repositories

Marko A. Rodriguez; Johan Bollen; Herbert Van De Sompel

2006-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

324

PEER-REVIEW Detection Of Lateral Non-Uniformities In Fluidized Bed Combustors  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, greatly influences solid circulation patterns and gas phase mixing which inturn affects various in-bed by Dent etal!! in a Fludized bed combustor. For a vertically rising bubble midway through the two sensorsPEER-REVIEW Detection Of Lateral Non-Uniformities In Fluidized Bed Combustors .. A. Venkata Ramayya

Columbia University

325

MJG:Peer Review, 5/00 1 M. J. Gouge  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, and for plasma discharge termination on demand. #12;MJG:Peer Review, 5/00 3 · Gas fueling prototype testing ­ response time experiments for impurity gas puffing into divertor · Pellet fueling development ­ world/s (deuterium) ­ pellet feed/rotor dynamics for centrifuge injector (with CEA) ­ piston and screw extruder

326

Technical/Peer Review Draft May 2006 PART II OVERVIEW1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Technical/Peer Review Draft May 2006 II-1 PART II OVERVIEW1 2 Energy, Industry, and Waste Fossil fuels (coal, oil, and natural gas) are used primarily for their concentration of chemical energy is identified as emissions from energy and emissions from industrial21 processes.22 23 Emissions by Month and

327

SRS Waste Solidification Building Project Peer Review, July...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

HSS Independent Activity Report - Rev. 0 Report Number: HIAR-SRS-2011-07-15 Site: Savannah River Site, NA-26 Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and...

328

Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 2012 August 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - August 2012 August 2012 Review of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Construction Quality The U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, conducted independent reviews of selected aspects of construction quality at the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Project (WTP). The reviews for this report were performed on site during February 6-10, 2012 and April 30 - May 4, 2012, and were the latest in a series of ongoing quarterly assessments of construction quality performed by Independent Oversight at the WTP. Independent Oversight determined that construction quality at WTP is

329

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - August 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 2011 August 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - August 2011 August 2011 Review of Commercial Grade Dedication Plans for the Safety Instrumented System at the Savannah River Site Waste Solidification Building Project The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of selected aspects of Savannah River Nuclear Solutions' (SRNS) plans for commercial grade dedication (CGD) of the Waste Solidification Building (WSB) Safety Instrumented System (SIS) safety significant components at the Savannah River Site (SRS). The independent review was conducted during June 14-24 and July 12-13, 2011, by Independent Oversight in coordination with the U.S. Department of Energy and the National Nuclear

330

Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal - June 2012 Federal - June 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Federal - June 2012 June 2012 Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Integrated Waste Treatment Unit Federal Operational Readiness Review This report documents the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), independent review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project-Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (SBWTP-IWTU) DOE (Federal) Operational Readiness Review (D-ORR). The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations and was intended to assess the effectiveness of the CORR process as implemented for the SBWTP-IWTU. This review also provides additional data regarding

331

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - September 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Savannah River Site - September 2012 Savannah River Site - September 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - September 2012 September 2012 Review of the Savannah River Site, Salt Waste Processing Facility, Construction Quality of Piping & Pipe Supports The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, conducted an independent review of construction quality at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Savannah River Site (SRS) Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). The focus of the review, performed on site between May 14 and 18, 2012, was piping and pipe supports. The review team also observed installation of two tanks in the dark cells (DCs). Subsequent to the onsite review, procurement records were reviewed for quality-related piping and piping system components.

332

Independent Oversight Review, Y-12 National Security Complex - June 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Y-12 National Security Complex - June Y-12 National Security Complex - June 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Y-12 National Security Complex - June 2012 June 2012 Review of the Y-12 Implementation Verification Review Processes This report documents the independent review of implementation verification review (IVR) processes at the Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12) conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight, Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review was performed from March 12 - 30, 2012. The objective of this review was to evaluate the extent to which the site management and operating contractor, B&W Y-12, a partnership of Babcock & Wilcox and Bechtel Corporation, and the Y-12 Site

333

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - September 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - September 2012 September 2012 Review of the Savannah River Site, Salt Waste Processing Facility, Construction Quality of Piping & Pipe Supports The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, conducted an independent review of construction quality at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Savannah River Site (SRS) Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). The focus of the review, performed on site between May 14 and 18, 2012, was piping and pipe supports. The review team also observed installation of two tanks in the dark cells (DCs). Subsequent to the onsite review, procurement records were reviewed for quality-related piping and piping system components.

334

Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Contractor - June 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Contractor - June 2012 June 2012 Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Integrated Waste Treatment Unit Contractor Operational Readiness Review This report documents the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), independent review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project-Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (SBWTP-IWTU) contractor Operational Readiness Review (C-ORR). The review was conducted at the Idaho Site from February 27 to March 6, 2012. This report discusses the background, scope, results, and conclusions of the review, as well as

335

Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office - August 2011 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review, Oak Ridge Office - August 2011 Review, Oak Ridge Office - August 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office - August 2011 August 2011 Review of the Oak Ridge Office Oversight of the Fire Protection Program at the Oak Ridge Reservation The Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of selected aspects of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Oak Ridge Office (ORO) fire protection program. The scope of the review was to assess ORO's oversight of contractor implementation of the site fire protection program. Key elements assessed included conducting comprehensive self-assessments, fulfilling the roles and responsibilities for the authority having jurisdiction (AHJ), reviewing and

336

Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor - June 2012 Contractor - June 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Contractor - June 2012 June 2012 Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Integrated Waste Treatment Unit Contractor Operational Readiness Review This report documents the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), independent review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project-Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (SBWTP-IWTU) contractor Operational Readiness Review (C-ORR). The review was conducted at the Idaho Site from February 27 to March 6, 2012. This report discusses the background, scope, results, and conclusions of the review, as well as opportunities for improvement (OFIs) and items identified for further

337

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - July 2011 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 2011 July 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - July 2011 July 2011 Review of Electrical System Configuration Management and Design Change Control at the Savannah River Site, Waste Solidification Building Project The Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of selected engineering processes for the Waste Solidification Building (WSB) safety significant electrical system at the Savannah River Site (SRS). The purpose of this review was to assess the adequacy of the contractor's electrical system configuration management and design change control during construction and initial system turnover activities. Interviews and reviewed WSB Project Electrical System DCFs, an SDDR, and

338

Independent Oversight Review, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - November 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - November 2012 November 2012 Review of Site Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) preparedness for severe natural phenomena events (NPEs). The HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations performed this review to evaluate the processes for identifying emergency response capabilities and maintaining them in a state of readiness in case of a severe NPE. Independent Oversight Review, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - November 2012

339

Independent Oversight Review, Idaho National Laboratory - September 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review, Idaho National Laboratory - September Review, Idaho National Laboratory - September 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Idaho National Laboratory - September 2011 September 2011 Review of the Occupational Radiation Program as Implemented and Recently Enhanced at the Idaho National Laboratory At the request of the Office of Nuclear Energy, and in accordance with Independent Oversight priorities, the Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) performed an initial independent assessment of the Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC (BEA) occupational radiation protection program at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). The HSS Office of Worker Safety and Health Policy provided a subject matter expert to support this independent review. HSS examined the effectiveness

340

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - May 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Laboratory - May Laboratory - May 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - May 2012 May 2012 Review of Site Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Los Alamos National Laboratory This report documents the independent review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) preparedness for severe natural phenomena events, conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations performed this review to evaluate the processes for identifying emergency response capabilities and maintaining them in a state of readiness in case of a severe natural phenomena event. Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - May 2012

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - August 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - August 2011 August 2011 Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Construction Quality The Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) conducted an independent review of selected aspects of construction quality at the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Project (WTP). The review, which was performed May 9-12, 2011, was the latest in a series of ongoing quarterly assessments of construction quality performed by Independent Oversight at the WTP construction site. HSS determined that construction quality at WTP was adequate in the areas

342

Independent Oversight Review, Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project - April 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project - April 2013 April 2013 Review of Radiation Protection Program Implementation at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project of the Idaho Site This report documents an independent review of activity-level radiation protection program (RPP) implementation at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) of the Idaho Site, as conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations. The purpose of this Independent Oversight targeted review

343

Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Site Waste Treatment and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Waste Treatment and Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant, August 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant, August 2013 August 2013 Review of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Construction Quality The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) conducted an independent review of selected aspects of construction quality at the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP). The review, which was performed June 10-14, 2013, was the latest in a series of ongoing quarterly assessments of construction quality performed by Independent Oversight at the WTP construction site. The scope of this quarterly assessment of construction quality review

344

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - January 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Los Alamos National Laboratory - Los Alamos National Laboratory - January 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - January 2012 January 2012 Review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility Fire Suppression System The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility (WCRRF) safety significant fire suppression system (FSS) vital safety system in conjunction with a scheduled Los Alamos Site Office (LASO) assessment. Overall, the LASO assessment was competently performed by knowledgeable LASO personnel using appropriate criteria as defined in LASO Procedure MP

345

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - January 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - January 2012 January 2012 Review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility Fire Suppression System The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility (WCRRF) safety significant fire suppression system (FSS) vital safety system in conjunction with a scheduled Los Alamos Site Office (LASO) assessment. Overall, the LASO assessment was competently performed by knowledgeable LASO personnel using appropriate criteria as defined in LASO Procedure MP

346

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory Chemistry and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Laboratory Laboratory Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility - January 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility - January 2012 January 2012 Review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility Fire Suppression Vital Safety System The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Chemistry and Metallurgy Research (CMR) Facility safety significant fire suppression system (FSS) vital safety system in conjunction with a scheduled Los Alamos Site Office (LASO) assessment. The purpose of the LASO assessment was to evaluate the

347

Independent Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site - April 2001 Independent Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site - April 2001 April 2001 Special Review of the Rocky Flats Closure Project Site The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Environment, Safety, and Health Oversight (EH-2), within the Office of Environment, Safety and Health, conducted an independent oversight Special Review at the Rocky Flats Closure Project (RFCP). The Special Review was conducted at the request of the Rocky Flats Field Office (RFFO), which is the DOE organizational element with responsibility for the RFCP (formerly known as the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site). Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC (KH) is the prime contractor for the RFCP. RFCP's project-oriented approach and aggressive scheduling have resulted

348

Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Federal - June 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Federal - June 2012 June 2012 Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Integrated Waste Treatment Unit Federal Operational Readiness Review This report documents the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), independent review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project-Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (SBWTP-IWTU) DOE (Federal) Operational Readiness Review (D-ORR). The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations and was intended to assess the effectiveness of the CORR process as implemented for

349

Independent Oversight Follow-up Review, Pacific Northwest National  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oversight Follow-up Review, Pacific Northwest National Oversight Follow-up Review, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory - April 2009 Independent Oversight Follow-up Review, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory - April 2009 April 2009 Review of Nuclear Safety Programs at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted a follow-up review of nuclear safety at the DOE Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) during January and February 2009. The follow-up review focused on PNNL efforts to address nuclear safety deficiencies identified in a November-December 2003 HSS Independent Oversight inspection of environment, safety, and health programs at PNNL. RPL has taken important steps to address the three nuclear safety findings

350

Independent Oversight Review, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - April 2013 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April April 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - April 2013 April 2013 Review of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Work Planning and Control Activities The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted a shadowing oversight activity to review the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) oversight of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). This Independent Oversight activity was performed by HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations personnel shadowing the CBFO's review of the WIPP operating contractor's Work Control Improvement Plan implementation and effectiveness review, and CBFO's annual review of the contractor's Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS), specifically

351

Independent Oversight Review, Idaho Site - November 2012 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site - November 2012 Site - November 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Idaho Site - November 2012 November 2012 Review of Radiation Protection Program Implementation at the Idaho Site This report documents an independent review of radiation protection program (RPP) implementation at the Idaho Site conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations. This targeted review was performed at the Idaho Site from September 4 to 7, 2012. This report discusses the scope, background, results, conclusions, and opportunities for improvement resulting from this review, as well as items identified for further follow-up by HSS.

352

Independent Oversight Follow-up Review, Pacific Northwest National  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Follow-up Review, Pacific Northwest National Follow-up Review, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory - April 2009 Independent Oversight Follow-up Review, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory - April 2009 April 2009 Review of Nuclear Safety Programs at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted a follow-up review of nuclear safety at the DOE Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) during January and February 2009. The follow-up review focused on PNNL efforts to address nuclear safety deficiencies identified in a November-December 2003 HSS Independent Oversight inspection of environment, safety, and health programs at PNNL. RPL has taken important steps to address the three nuclear safety findings

353

Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office - November 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- November - November 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office - November 2012 November 2012 Review of the Richland Operations Office Oversight of Implementation Verification Review Processes This report documents the independent review of implementation verification review (IVR) processes at the Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), which is within the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The onsite review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations from August 13 to 17, 2012. The objective of this assessment was to evaluate the extent to which the DOE-RL has developed and employed appropriate methods for oversight of contractor

354

Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office - November 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Richland Operations Office - November Richland Operations Office - November 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office - November 2012 November 2012 Review of the Richland Operations Office Oversight of Implementation Verification Review Processes This report documents the independent review of implementation verification review (IVR) processes at the Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), which is within the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The onsite review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations from August 13 to 17, 2012. The objective of this assessment was to evaluate the extent to which the DOE-RL has developed and employed appropriate methods for oversight of contractor

355

Independent Oversight Targeted Review, Y-12 National Security Complex -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Y-12 National Security Y-12 National Security Complex - February 2012 Independent Oversight Targeted Review, Y-12 National Security Complex - February 2012 February 2012 Targeted Review of Site Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Y-12 National Security Complex This report documents the independent targeted review of the Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12) preparedness for severe natural phenomena events, conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations and was carried out as the pilot for similar reviews at other U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) sites. The purpose of the targeted review

356

Independent Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site - April 2001 Independent Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site - April 2001 April 2001 Special Review of the Rocky Flats Closure Project Site The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Environment, Safety, and Health Oversight (EH-2), within the Office of Environment, Safety and Health, conducted an independent oversight Special Review at the Rocky Flats Closure Project (RFCP). The Special Review was conducted at the request of the Rocky Flats Field Office (RFFO), which is the DOE organizational element with responsibility for the RFCP (formerly known as the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site). Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC (KH) is the prime contractor for the RFCP.

357

ORISE: Enhancing Peer Review Tools and Services to Support DOE...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

to specific presentations prior to the five-day U.S. Department of Energy's Hydrogen Fuel Cells and Vehicle Technologies annual program evaluation and review-the largest for...

358

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Field Office Tritium  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Field Office Tritium Field Office Tritium Facilities - November 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Field Office Tritium Facilities - November 2013 November 13, 2013 Review of Savannah River Field Office Tritium Facilities Radiological Controls Activity-Level Implementation This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of the radiological protection program at the Savannah River Site (SRS) tritium facilities implemented at the activity-level by Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC and its subcontractors. The review was performed by the Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations within the broader context of an ongoing program of targeted assessments of radiological control programs, with an emphasis on

359

Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Tank Farms - April 2013 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April 2013 April 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Tank Farms - April 2013 April 2013 Review of Management of Safety Systems at the Hanford Tank Farms The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the management of safety class or safety significant structures, systems and components (hereinafter referred to as safety systems) at the Hanford Site Tank Farms. The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations. The purpose of this Independent Oversight targeted assessment effort is to evaluate processes for monitoring, maintaining, and operating safety systems to ensure their continued reliable capability to perform the

360

Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 2013 January 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - January 2013 January 2013 Review of the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Black-Cell and Hard-To-Reach Pipe Spools Procurement Process and the Office of River Protection Audit of That Process The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted a concurrent independent review with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of River Protection (ORP) of selected aspects of the Bechtel National, Inc. (BNI) Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) procurement processes for WTP black-cell (BC) and hard-to-reach (HtR) pipe spools. The Independent Oversight review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Waste Treatment and Immobilization Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - August 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - August 2012 August 2012 Review of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Construction Quality The U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, conducted independent reviews of selected aspects of construction quality at the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Project (WTP). The reviews for this report were performed on site during February 6-10, 2012 and April 30 - May 4, 2012, and were the latest in a series of ongoing quarterly assessments of construction quality performed by Independent Oversight at the WTP.

362

Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 2013 January 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - January 2013 January 2013 Review of the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Black-Cell and Hard-To-Reach Pipe Spools Procurement Process and the Office of River Protection Audit of That Process The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted a concurrent independent review with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of River Protection (ORP) of selected aspects of the Bechtel National, Inc. (BNI) Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) procurement processes for WTP black-cell (BC) and hard-to-reach (HtR) pipe spools. The Independent Oversight review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and

363

Independent Oversight Review, Idaho National Laboratory - April 2010 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April April 2010 Independent Oversight Review, Idaho National Laboratory - April 2010 April 2010 Review of the Idaho National Laboratory Fuel Conditioning Facility Safety Basis This report presents the results of an independent review of the upgraded safety basis for the Fuel Conditioning Facility (FCF), a Hazard Category 2 nuclear facility at the Idaho National Laboratory, which is managed and operated by Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC (BEA) for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Idaho Operations Office (DOE-ID). The review was conducted at the request of the Office of Nuclear Energy (NE) and DOE-ID by the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Office of Independent Oversight with assistance of the HSS Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance. The review team concludes that BEA broadly followed the guidance in the

364

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - September  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - September 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - September 2011 September 2011 Review of the Facility Centered Assessment of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Disposition Project This report documents the results of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Independent Oversight review of the Facility Centered Assessment (FCA) of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Waste Disposition Project (WDP), which includes the Radioassay and Nondestructive Testing (RANT) Facility; Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility (WCRRF); and Area G transuranic (TRU) waste operations. This report was developed and approved in accordance with DOE O 227.1, Independent Oversight Program. The

365

Independent Oversight Review, DOE/NNSA Nuclear Facilities - April 2013 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE/NNSA Nuclear Facilities - April DOE/NNSA Nuclear Facilities - April 2013 Independent Oversight Review, DOE/NNSA Nuclear Facilities - April 2013 April 2013 Lessons Learned from the 2012 Targeted Reviews of Emergency Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at Select DOE/NNSA Nuclear Facilities This report provides lessons learned from the 2012 reviews performed by Independent Oversight. The reviews performed during the fall of 2011 and throughout 2012 were at DOE/NNSA sites with hazard category 1 and 2 nuclear facilities, some of which also have significant quantities of hazardous chemicals on site. The purpose of the Independent Oversight review was to determine the state of emergency preparedness of selected sites by examining the sites' processes for evaluating plausible severe NPEs;

366

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - April 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Los Alamos National Laboratory - Los Alamos National Laboratory - April 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - April 2012 April 2012 Review of the Emergency Response Organization at the Los Alamos National Laboratory The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) emergency response organization (ERO) program. The purpose of the review was to evaluate the processes for establishing and maintaining an ERO that has overall responsibility for initial and ongoing emergency response and mitigation. The review scope was coordinated with the Los Alamos Site Office (LASO), and was conducted February 7-9, 2012. LANL has established an ERO, as defined in LANL planning and preparedness

367

Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Waste Treatment and Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - December 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - December 2013 December 2013 Review of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Construction Quality This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of selected aspects of construction quality at the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP). The review, which was performed September 9-13, 2013, was the latest in a series of ongoing quarterly assessments of construction quality performed by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The scope of this quarterly assessment of construction quality review included observations

368

Independent Oversight Special Review, Department of Energy sites - February  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Special Review, Department of Energy sites - Special Review, Department of Energy sites - February 2008 Independent Oversight Special Review, Department of Energy sites - February 2008 February 2008 Independent Oversight Special Review of Workplace Exposure Monitoring From January 2006 through June 2007, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), evaluated the effectiveness of DOE's workplace monitoring programs for non-radiological hazards at eight sites as part of regularly scheduled inspections. These reviews focused on site programs for ensuring that workers are protected in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 851 and/or DOE Order 440.1A (which preceded 10 CFR 851). This report summarizes the observations, insights, and lessons learned from these

369

Independent Oversight Review, Nevada National Security Site, December 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Security Site, National Security Site, December 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Nevada National Security Site, December 2013 December 2013 Targeted Review of the Safety Significant Blast Door and Special Door Interlock Systems and Review of Federal Assurance Capability at the Nevada National Security Site This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of safety significant Blast Door Interlock and Special Door Interlock systems at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) Device Assembly Facility (DAF). The NNSS DAF is operated by National Security Technologies, LLC under contract to the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Nevada Field Office. The Independent Oversight review was performed on site August 19-27, 2013 by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office

370

Independent Oversight Followup Review, Idaho National Laboratory - May 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Followup Review, Idaho National Laboratory - Followup Review, Idaho National Laboratory - May 2011 Independent Oversight Followup Review, Idaho National Laboratory - May 2011 May 2011 Idaho National Laboratory Fuel Conditioning Facility Safety Basis Review Followup The purpose of this follow-up review was to verify how and to what extent Idaho National Laboratory (INL) addressed the Significant Issues that were identified in the April 2010 Independent Oversight report on the INL Fuel Conditioning Facility (FCF) safety basis review, as well as the consideration given to the recommendations that were made. Significant Issues were defined in that report as problems or concerns that affected the validity of the FCF safety basis documentation. The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) fulfilled this objective by reviewing the draft

371

ORISE: Coordinating Scientific Peer Reviews to Advance Energy Efficiency  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Energy Efficiency Energy Efficiency ORISE Reviews and Evaluates Technologies that Advance Energy Efficiency ORISE Reviews and Evaluates Technologies that Advance Energy Efficiency In addition to renewable energy and changes in individual behavior, energy efficiency is generally achieved through the development of more efficient technologies. Buildings are being constructed with more energy efficient systems, fluorescent light bulbs are replacing incandescent lights, and new vehicle technologies are enabling America to use less petroleum. The Oak Ridge Institute for Science Education (ORISE) realizes that energy efficiency encompasses a wide spectrum of industries and supports the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in its mission to reduce America's dependence on foreign oil.

372

2012 CERTS Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Agenda  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

R&M Review R&M Review August 7-8, 2012 Cornell University Statler Hotel 130 Statler Drive | Ithaca, NY 14853 (607) 257-2500 Day 1: August 7, 2011 The meeting will be held in the Statler Hotel (Yale/Princeton conference rooms) 8:30 Continental Breakfast (Conference Foyer 2) 9:00 Introductions and overview - Bob Thomas 9:15 DOE Vision/Priorities/Future Directions - Phil Overholt 9:30 #1: Transmission Investment Assessment under Uncertainty About Fuel Prices, Technology, Renewables Penetration and Market Responses Using a Multi-Stage Stochastic Model Approach with Recourse Ben Hobbs, Dick Schuler, Francisco Munoz 10:15 #2: Renewable Integration Through Risk-Limiting Dispatch And Distributed Resource Aggregation Pravin Varaiya, Felix Wu, K. Poolla, Anand Subramanian

373

Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Tank Farms - November 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review, Hanford Tank Farms - November 2011 Review, Hanford Tank Farms - November 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Tank Farms - November 2011 November 2011 Review of Hanford Tank Farms Safety Basis Amendment for Double-Shell Tank Ventilation System Upgrades The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent oversight review of the draft amendment to the Hanford Tank Farms safety basis for upgrading the double-shell tank (DST) primary tank ventilation (PTV) systems to safety-significant designation. The Tank Farms are Hazard Category 2 DOE nuclear facilities. The review was performed during the period July 25 - August 12, 2011 by the HSS Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management

374

Independent Oversight Review, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - August 2000 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - August Review, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - August 2000 Independent Oversight Review, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - August 2000 August 2000 Emergency Management Program Review at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Emergency Management Oversight, within the Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance, conducted a review of the emergency management program at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in May 2000. The primary purpose of this review was twofold: to assess selected emergency management system elements that focus on WIPP's readiness to protect site personnel and the public from the consequences of onsite events that may result in the release of hazardous materials; and to evaluate the site's ability to provide appropriate information or

375

Independent Oversight Review, Sandia Site Office - January 2013 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sandia Site Office - January 2013 Sandia Site Office - January 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Sandia Site Office - January 2013 January 2013 Review of the Sandia Site Office Quality Assurance Assessment of the Manzano Nuclear Operations The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, conducted an independent review of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Sandia Site Office (SSO) quality assurance (QA) assessment of the Manzano nuclear operations. The focus of the review, performed on site November 14-15, 2012, was to shadow SSO's QA assessment and evaluate its performance of compliance oversight of Sandia Corporation safety management programs (SMPs) at Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) hazard-categorized nuclear facilities per SSO procedure

376

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July 2013 July 2013 Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Livermore Field Office (LFO) and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Site 200 preparedness for severe natural phenomena events (NPEs). The HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations performed this review to evaluate the processes for identifying emergency response capabilities and maintaining them in a state of readiness in case of a severe NPE. This

377

Independent Oversight Review, Sandia Site Office - January 2013 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sandia Site Office - January 2013 Sandia Site Office - January 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Sandia Site Office - January 2013 January 2013 Review of the Sandia Site Office Quality Assurance Assessment of the Manzano Nuclear Operations The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, conducted an independent review of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Sandia Site Office (SSO) quality assurance (QA) assessment of the Manzano nuclear operations. The focus of the review, performed on site November 14-15, 2012, was to shadow SSO's QA assessment and evaluate its performance of compliance oversight of Sandia Corporation safety management programs (SMPs) at Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) hazard-categorized nuclear facilities per SSO procedure

378

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - January 2013 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 2013 January 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - January 2013 January 2013 Review of the Savannah River Site, Waste Solidification Building, Construction Quality of Mechanical Systems Installation and Selected Aspects of Fire Protection System Design The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of construction quality and selected aspects for fire protection system design at the DOE Savannah River Site (SRS) Waste Solidification Building (WSB). The review was performed on site between September 24 and 27, 2012, focusing on the WSB process vessel ventilation (PVV) system and the fire protection active and passive

379

2012 SG Peer Review - Day 2 Panel Discussion: Puesh Kumar, American Public Power Association  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review Peer Review June 7-8, 2012 San Diego, CA Puesh M. Kumar Director of Engineering & Operations Public Power and APPA * Public power: operated by local governments; reliable, responsive, not-for-profit * 2,000 community-owned electric utilities, 46 million people * Non-profit, non-partisan organization, est. 1940 - Public policy interests - Member services - Reliable electricity at reasonable prices - Proper protection of the environment Public Power in the US 63 648 384 340 308 133 80 30 22 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Less than 10 11 to 1,000 1,001 to 2,000 2,001 to 4000 4,001 to 10,000 10,001 to 20,000 20,001 to 40,000 40,001 - 100,000 More than 100,000 Customers Ser ved Public Power by Number of Customers Served DEED * Demonstration of Energy Efficient Developments * Created in 1980

380

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review and Update Meeting | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Update Meeting and Update Meeting Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review and Update Meeting The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions; the agenda is available below. Presentations are available through the individual session links. Presentations Day 1 Session 1: Chaired by Imre Gyuk, DOE Session 2: Chaired by Ron Staubly, NETL Session 3: Chaired by Bill Capp, Grid Storage Consulting Poster Session: National Lab Projects | ARPA-E Projects Day 2 Session 1: Chaired by Tony Martino, SNL Session 2: Chaired by Ross Guttromson, SNL Session 3: Chaired by Stan Atcitty, SNL Poster Session: SBIR Projects | University Projects | ARRA Projects

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Microsoft PowerPoint - 16.1045_Peer Reviews Panel_Lehman Workshop Briefing w-headings  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Science Science Peer Reviews 101 Daniel R. Lehman, Director Office of Project Assessment Office of Project Assessment Office of Science Peer Review 101 Panel Members Mr. Daniel Lehman, Director, Office of Project Assessment Office of Science Mr. Hanley Lee, Deputy Manager, SLAC Site Office (formerly SC Federal Project Director for the LCLS Project) Mr. James Krupnick, Associate Lab. Director/Chief Operating Officer Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (formerly Project Director for the Molecular Foundry Project) Mr. Scott Samuelson, PMP Acting Director, NNSA Office of Major Systems Acquisitions (formerly NNSA Federal Project Director for the NIF Project) Office of Science Peer Reviews 101 (formerly NNSA Federal Project Director for the NIF Project) 2 Office of Science Peer Reviews 101

382

Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Transuranic Waste Processing  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oak Ridge Transuranic Waste Oak Ridge Transuranic Waste Processing Facility - December 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Transuranic Waste Processing Facility - December 2013 December 2013 Review of the Fire Protection Program and Fire Protection Systems at the Transuranic Waste Processing Center This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of the fire protection programs and systems at the Oak Ridge Transuranic Waste Processing Center. The review was performed during May 20-23, 2013, and July 15-19, 2013, by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, which is within the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security. The review was one part of a targeted assessment of fire protection at nuclear facilities across the DOE complex.

383

Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Site - September 2013 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Site - September 2013 Hanford Site - September 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Site - September 2013 September 2013 Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Hanford Site This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of the preparedness of the DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE/RL) and the various Hanford Site contractors to deal with severe natural phenomena events (NPE). The review was conducted April - May 2013 by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, which is within the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security. The HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations performed this review to evaluate the processes for identifying emergency response capabilities

384

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Savannah River Site Salt Waste Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility - August 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility - August 2013 August 2013 Review of the Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility Safety Basis and Design Development. This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of the safety basis and design development for the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Savannah River Site. The review was performed February 12-14, 2013 by DOE's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, which is within the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security. The purpose of the review was to evaluate the safety basis, design, and the associated technical documents developed for

385

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Savannah River Site Salt Waste Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility - August 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility - August 2013 August 2013 Review of the Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility Safety Basis and Design Development. This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of the safety basis and design development for the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Savannah River Site. The review was performed February 12-14, 2013 by DOE's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, which is within the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security. The purpose of the review was to evaluate the safety basis, design, and the associated technical documents developed for

386

Independent Oversight Review of DOE Headquarters Emergency Response Plans  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review of DOE Headquarters Emergency Response Review of DOE Headquarters Emergency Response Plans and Performance, March 2003 Independent Oversight Review of DOE Headquarters Emergency Response Plans and Performance, March 2003 The Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA) conducted a review of emergency response plans and performance at DOE Headquarters (HQ) in February 2003. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the readiness and effectiveness of the DOE and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) emergency response teams for a postulated emergency at a field site, and the HQ Incident Command Team for an emergency affecting the Forrestal building. In addition, OA was tasked to evaluate the current status of DOE's Continuity of Operations (COOP) program plans and provide recommendations

387

Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Transuranic Waste Processing  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oak Ridge Transuranic Waste Oak Ridge Transuranic Waste Processing Center, September 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Transuranic Waste Processing Center, September 2013 September 2013 Review of Management of Safety Systems at the Oak Ridge Transuranic Waste Processing Center and Associated Feedback and Improvement Processes. This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of the management of safety significant structures, systems, and components at the Oak Ridge Transuranic Waste Processing Center (TWPC). The review was performed April 2-5, April 15-19, and May 19-23, 2013, by the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, which is within the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security. The review was carried out within the broader context of an ongoing program of

388

Independent Oversight Review, Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site - March 2000 Independent Oversight Review, Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site - March 2000 March 2000 Review of the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site Transportation Emergency Management Program The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Emergency Management Oversight, within the Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance, conducted a transportation emergency management review and a follow-up review of the emergency management program at Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS) in February 2000. The primary purpose of this review was to assess the effectiveness of the Department's emergency management programs for transportation events involving hazardous materials (not related to transuranic waste or nuclear

389

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program, 2013 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report (Book)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The fiscal year (FY) 2013 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), in conjunction with DOE's Vehicle Technologies Office AMR, was held from May 13-16, 2013, at the Crystal City Marriott and Crystal Gateway Marriott in Arlington, Virginia. This report is a summary of comments by AMR peer reviewers about the hydrogen and fuel cell projects funded by DOE's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE).

Not Available

2013-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

390

Independent Oversight Review, Nevada Site Office - October 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- October 2011 - October 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Nevada Site Office - October 2011 October 2011 Review of Nevada Site Office Criticality Safety Assessments at the Criticality Experiments Facility and Training Assembly for Criticality Safety and Appraisal of the Criticality Experiments Facility Startup Plan The purpose of this independent review by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), was to shadow the Nevada Site Office (NSO) line oversight activities conducted August 29 - September 2, 2011, to determine the level of compliance of Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) with American National Standards Institute and American Nuclear

391

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos Site Office - March 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Los Alamos Site Office - March 2012 Los Alamos Site Office - March 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos Site Office - March 2012 March 2012 Review of the Los Alamos Site Office Safety System Oversight Program Self-Assessment The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the Los Alamos Site Office (LASO) safety system oversight (SSO) program in conjunction with a scheduled LASO self-assessment. The purpose of the LASO self-assessment was to evaluate the SSO program's compliance with U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) orders and standards, and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) and LASO directives and procedures. The self-assessment was conducted December 5-9, 2011.

392

Independent Oversight Review, Hanford K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

K Basin and Cold Vacuum K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying Facility - August 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Hanford K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying Facility - August 2012 August 2012 Review of Hanford K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying Facility Found Fuel Multi-Canister Overpack Operations The purpose of this independent oversight review by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) was to observe the operations associated with processing a Multi-Canister Overpack (MCO) of "found fuel" (small quantities of spent fuel discovered during cleanup of the reactor burial grounds) at the Cold Vacuum Drying Facility (CVDF). The found fuel MCO was transported from the K West Basin on the Hanford

393

Independent Oversight Review, Hanford K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford K Basin and Cold Vacuum Hanford K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying Facility - August 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Hanford K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying Facility - August 2012 August 2012 Review of Hanford K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying Facility Found Fuel Multi-Canister Overpack Operations The purpose of this independent oversight review by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) was to observe the operations associated with processing a Multi-Canister Overpack (MCO) of "found fuel" (small quantities of spent fuel discovered during cleanup of the reactor burial grounds) at the Cold Vacuum Drying Facility (CVDF). The found fuel MCO was transported from the K West Basin on the Hanford

394

Independent Oversight Review, Nevada Site Office - October 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Nevada Site Office - October 2011 Nevada Site Office - October 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Nevada Site Office - October 2011 October 2011 Review of Nevada Site Office Criticality Safety Assessments at the Criticality Experiments Facility and Training Assembly for Criticality Safety and Appraisal of the Criticality Experiments Facility Startup Plan The purpose of this independent review by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), was to shadow the Nevada Site Office (NSO) line oversight activities conducted August 29 - September 2, 2011, to determine the level of compliance of Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) with American National Standards Institute and American Nuclear

395

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos Site Office - March 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site Office - March 2012 Site Office - March 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos Site Office - March 2012 March 2012 Review of the Los Alamos Site Office Safety System Oversight Program Self-Assessment The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the Los Alamos Site Office (LASO) safety system oversight (SSO) program in conjunction with a scheduled LASO self-assessment. The purpose of the LASO self-assessment was to evaluate the SSO program's compliance with U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) orders and standards, and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) and LASO directives and procedures. The self-assessment was conducted December 5-9, 2011. Overall, the LASO self-assessment was competently performed by

396

Independent Oversight Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March 2001 Independent Oversight Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March 2001 March 2001 Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Health Services Department The Office of Environment, Safety, and Health (ES&H) Oversight (EH-2) in conjunction with the Accreditation Association of Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC) reviewed the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Health Services Department on March 19-21, 2001. The purpose of the review was twofold. First, EH-2 performed a review of selected activities to identify positive attributes, issues, and opportunities for improvement. Second, the AAAHC surveyed the medical program for accreditation. This report documents

397

Independent Oversight Review, Department of Energy Contractor - August 2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Contractor - Department of Energy Contractor - August 2000 Independent Oversight Review, Department of Energy Contractor - August 2000 August 2000 Review of Department of Energy Contractor Occupational Medicine Programs from December 1998 to June 1999 The Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Oversight performed a two-phased review of eight Departmental contractor occupational medicine programs. The first phase of the review was completed in September 1998 and the second phase in December 1999. To conduct the review, Oversight teamed with the Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC), a non-profit accreditation organization for health-care facilities. The results of the second-phase review reflected many of those addressed in the interim report. Upon completion of the two-phased review, six of the

398

Independent Oversight Review, DOE Headquarters Facilities - March 2002 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Headquarters Facilities - March DOE Headquarters Facilities - March 2002 Independent Oversight Review, DOE Headquarters Facilities - March 2002 March 2002 Review of the Headquarters Facilities Emergency Response Plans The Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance conducted a review of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Headquarters facilities emergency response plans in February 2002. The purpose of this review was to assess the Department's readiness to respond to emergency events, such as fires and hazardous material releases (inside and outside the building), that occur at any of the following facilities: the two primary DOE Headquarters facilities, namely, the James V. Forrestal building, which is located in Washington, D.C., and the main Germantown, Maryland, facility; and the 270 Corporate Center and Cloverleaf

399

Independent Oversight Review, Idaho National Laboratory - March 2010 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March March 2010 Independent Oversight Review, Idaho National Laboratory - March 2010 March 2010 Review of the Idaho National Laboratory Fuel Conditioning Facility Safety Basis This report presents the results of an independent review of the upgraded safety basis for the Fuel Conditioning Facility (FCF), a Hazard Category 2 nuclear facility at the Idaho National Laboratory, which is managed and operated by Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC (BEA) for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Idaho Operations Office (DOE-ID). The present mission of the FCF is to demonstrate the technical feasibility of electrometallurgical technology for treating spent nuclear fuel from Experimental Breeder Reactor-II and other similar fuels. The review was conducted at the request of the Office of Nuclear Energy (NE) and DOE-ID by the Office of Health,

400

Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - July 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oak Ridge National Laboratory - July Oak Ridge National Laboratory - July 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - July 2011 July 2011 Review of Selected Elements of Emergency Management at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), Office of Independent Oversight, performed a review of specific portions of the emergency management program at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) between September and November 2010. The focus of this review was to verify the status of corrective actions from the 2008 HSS emergency management inspection, assess two recent AARs for two actual events, and assess both the DOE ORNL Site Office (OSO) and University of Tennessee-Battelle, LLC (UT-Battelle) self-assessment and issues management

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - November  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Laboratory - National Laboratory - November 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - November 2013 November 2013 Review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Radiological Controls Activity-Level Implementation This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of radiological protection program activity-level implementation performed by Los Alamos National Security and its subcontractors at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos Neutron Science Center, and Environmental and Waste Management Operations Area G facilities. The review was performed August 19-29, 2013, by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, which is within the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security. This report discusses the scope, background,

402

Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Waste Treatment and Immobilization Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project - October 2010 Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project - October 2010 October 2010 Review of Nuclear Safety Culture at the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) conducted an independent review of the nuclear safety culture at the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) project at the Hanford Site during August and September 2010. The HSS team performed the review in response to a request in a July 30, 2010, memorandum from the Assistant Secretary for the DOE Headquarters Office of Environmental Management (EM), which referred to nuclear safety concerns raised by a contractor employee

403

Advanced Combustion, Emission Control, Health Impacts, and Fuels Merit Review and Peer Evaluation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

06 06 a n n u a l p r o g r e s s r e p o r t L e s s d e p e n d e n c e o n f o r e i g n o i l t o d a y, a n d t r a n s i t i o n t o a p e t r o l e u m - f r e e , e m i s s i o n s - f r e e v e h i c l e t o m o r r o w . F r e e d o m C A r A n d V e h i C l e T e C h n o l o g i e s P r o g r A m AdvAnced combustion, emission controls, HeAltH impActs, And Fuels merit review And peer evAluAtion Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 October 2006 Dear Colleague: This document summarizes the comments provided by the Review Panel for the FY 2006 Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Combustion, Emission Controls, Health Impacts, and Fuels Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, the "ACE Review," held on May 15-18, 2006 at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). The raw evaluations and comments of the panel were provided (with reviewers' names deleted) to the presenters in early June and were used by national laboratory

404

Radioactive Waste Isolation in Salt: Peer review of documents dealing with geophysical investigations  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Salt Repository Project, a US Department of Energy program to develop a mined repository in salt for high-level radioactive waste, is governed by a complex and sometimes inconsistent array of laws, administrative regulations, guidelines, and position papers. In conducting multidisciplinary peer reviews of contractor documents in support of this project, Argonne National Laboratory has needed to inform its expert reviewers of these governmental mandates, with particular emphasis on the relationship between issues and the technical work undertaken. This report acquaints peer review panelists with the regulatory framework as it affects their reviews of site characterization plans and related documents, including surface-based and underground test plans. Panelists will be asked to consider repository performance objectives and issues as they judge the adequacy of proposed geophysical testing. All site-specific discussions relate to the Deaf Smith County site in Texas, which was approved for site characterization by the President in May 1986. Natural processes active at the Deaf Smith County site and the status of geophysical testing near the site are reviewed briefly. 25 refs., 4 figs., 5 tabs.

McGinnis, L.D.; Bowen, R.H.

1987-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

405

Hydrogen Production Cost Estimate Using Biomass Gasification: Independent Review  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This independent review is the conclusion arrived at from data collection, document reviews, interviews and deliberation from December 2010 through April 2011 and the technical potential of Hydrogen Production Cost Estimate Using Biomass Gasification. The Panel reviewed the current H2A case (Version 2.12, Case 01D) for hydrogen production via biomass gasification and identified four principal components of hydrogen levelized cost: CapEx; feedstock costs; project financing structure; efficiency/hydrogen yield. The panel reexamined the assumptions around these components and arrived at new estimates and approaches that better reflect the current technology and business environments.

Ruth, M.

2011-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

406

PEER REVIEWED  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

restaurant initiative to increase availability of healthy menu options in Somerville, Massachusetts:

unknown authors

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

407

Independent Oversight Review, Nevada Site Office and National Security  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site Office and National Site Office and National Security Technologies, LLC - November 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Nevada Site Office and National Security Technologies, LLC - November 2011 November 2011 Review of Nevada Site Office and National Security Technologies, LLC, Line Oversight and Contractor Assurance Systems Self-Assessment The purpose of this independent oversight review by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), was to shadow the Nevada Site Office (NSO) and the National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec), line oversight and contractor assurance systems (LOCAS) self-assessment conducted September 19 - 23, 2011, at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS). The NSO/NSTec self-assessment focused on:

408

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Second Generation Emissions Study - Rick Fioravanti, DNV KEMA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

number 2012 DOE Energy Storage Program Peer Review Second Generation Emissions Study Washington, DC September 26 - 28, 2012 Original KEMA Study on Emission Benefits  Study was conducted in 2007 and compared a flywheel to traditional technologies - Study highlights - Showed emission savings from utilization of storage - Study provided a simple "snapshot" of potential trends - Compared a flywheel to natural gas, coal, and pumped hydro systems - Methodology "vetted" at 2007 EESAT Conference - Next steps called for a "deeper dive into actual performance numbers - Actual simulations of specific ISO  Today, study is still cited as the main "Emission " Study for such applications - Results referenced in many cases as a secondary benefit of storage systems

409

2010 DOE Peer Review Update Conference LIST OF ATTENDEES Last Name First Name Organization Country  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2/2010 2/2010 1 2010 DOE Peer Review Update Conference LIST OF ATTENDEES Last Name First Name Organization Country Aalmans Luc General Compression USA Adams Michael Constellation Energy USA Agar Ertan Drexel University USA Agrawal Poonum Sentech, Inc USA Ahmed Jasim BOSCH USA Akhil Abbas Sandia National Laboratories USA Alexander Iwan Case Western Reserve University USA Alexander Jane USA Amy Fabrice Air Products USA Anderson Dianne Case Western Reserve University USA Anderson Travis Sandia National Laboratories USA Andrews George Oak Ridge National Laboratory USA Arseneaux James Beacon Power Corporation USA Aselage Terrence Sandia National Laboratories USA Asgeirsson Haukur DTE Energy USA Atcitty Stan Sandia National Laboratories USA

410

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Amber Kinetics Flywheel Energy Storage Demo - Ed Chiao, Amber Kinetics  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

amber_kinetics amber_kinetics DOE Peer Review September 2012 Ed Chiao, CEO amber_kinetics Amber Kinetics: Our Flywheel History Start-up launched in 2009, Stanford University Cleantech Entrepreneurship class Established a technology licensing & flywheel development partnership with LLNL; Amber Kinetics identified new material & lower-cost rotor designs for commercialization Awarded a Smart Grid Energy Storage Demonstration grant award for flywheels Awarded a matching grant for development & demonstration of flywheel technology Stanford University Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy California Energy Commission World-class institutions | innovative, deep flywheel technology owned by Amber Amber Kinetics, Inc. - Confidential and Proprietary, All Rights Reserved

411

Microsoft Word - A-14-09-29169 Final DOE Peer Review Ltr.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SOCIAL SECURITY SOCIAL SECURITY SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION BALTIMORE, MD 21235-0001 March 5, 2010 MEMORANDUM FOR THE HONORABLE GREGORY H. FRIEDMAN INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SUBJECT: Department of Energy Peer Review for the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2009 The attached report presents the results of our external quality control review of the Department of Energy, Office of Inspector General, Office of Audit Services. Your response to the draft report is included as Appendix B. We thank you and your staff for the assistance and cooperation provided during our review. If you have any questions or would like to discuss the report, please call me, or have your staff contact Steven L. Schaeffer, Assistant Inspector General for Audit, at

412

Savannah River Site - Salt Waste Processing Facility Independent Technical Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SALT WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY SALT WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL REVIEW November 22, 2006 Conducted by: Harry Harmon, Team Lead Civil/Structural Sub Team Facility Safety Sub Team Engineering Sub Team Peter Lowry, Lead James Langsted, Lead George Krauter, Lead Robert Kennedy Chuck Negin Art Etchells Les Youd Jerry Evatt Oliver Block Loring Wyllie Richard Stark Tim Adams Tom Anderson Todd LaPointe Stephen Gosselin Carl Costantino Norman Moreau Patrick Corcoran John Christian Ken Cooper Kari McDaniel _____________________________ Harry D. Harmon ITR Team Leader SPD-SWPF-217 SPD-SWPF-217: Salt Waste Processing Facility Independent Technical Review 11/22/2006 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The ITR Team wishes to thank Shari Clifford of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory for

413

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - January 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Corrective Action Corrective Action Effectiveness Review The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), evaluated the Los Alamos Site Office (LASO) safety system oversight (SSO) assessment of Los Alamos National Laboratory's (LANL) corrective actions to address prior LASO SSO findings. The purpose of the LASO assessment was to evaluate the effectiveness of LANL's performance feedback and improvement process and provide U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) line management with objective information on LASO's effectiveness in managing corrective issues related to nuclear facility safety. The LASO assessment was conducted July 25-29, 2012, and the final report was issued on October 22, 2012. Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - January 2013

414

Assessment of Financial Savings from Peer Reviews of In-Progress Projects: A Case Study from the Department of Energy's Hydrogen Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Results of a study to assess the financial savings to the Department of Energys (DOE) Hydrogen Program due to decisions made from peer reviews.

415

SECA CTP Peer Review Oct. 25-26, 2003 Review Results  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Components 11 * Modeling 3 * Balance of Plant 2 Topical Area Reviewed 0 20 40 60 80 Percentage Materials & Cell Components Modeling Balance of Plant Review Results Materials &...

416

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: NSTAR Automated Mater Reading Based Dynamic Pricing - Douglas Horton, NSTAR Electric & Gas  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Peer Review Meeting Peer Review Meeting AMR Based Dynamic Pricing y g Doug Horton NSTAR Electric & Gas Co. 6/8/2012 AMR Based Dynamic Pricing Objective Provide two-way communication of electricity cost & consumption data utilizing the customers existing meter & Internet. Goal to achieve 5% reduction in peak and Goal to achieve 5% reduction in peak and average load. Life-cycle Funding ($K) Total Budget Total DOE Funding to Technical Scope Use customer's existing AMR meter and broadband Internet to achieve two way Total Budget Total DOE Funding Funding to Date $4,900k $2,362k $1,623k broadband Internet to achieve two way communication and "AMI" functionality Cutting-edge solution to integrate: * Existing meters E i ti I t t December 2008 * Existing Internet * Existing billing & CIS

417

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2012 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report: May 14-18, 2012, Arlington, VA  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document summarizes the comments provided by peer reviewers on hydrogen and fuel cell projects presented at the fiscal year (FY) 2012 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), held May 14-18, 2012, in Arlington, VA.

Not Available

2012-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

418

2012 SG Peer Review - Smart Inverter Controls and Microgrid Interoperation at DECC - Tom Rizy, ORNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

g g Peer Review Meeting Smart Inverter Controls & Microgrid Interoperation at the Distributed Energy Communications & Controls (DECC) Lab ( ) D. Tom Rizy Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) June 7 th 2012 June 7 th , 2012 Smart Inverter (SI) Controls and Microgrid (MG) Interoperation Microgrid (MG) Interoperation Objectives * D l d SI l f l i l DECC Microgrid * Develop and test SI controls for multiple renewable/nonrenewable DER. * Develop MG controls and communication requirements for high penetration DER. * I l t MG t DECC L b Technical Scope * Implement MG at DECC Lab. * Transfer technology to industry. Life-cycle Funding Summary ($K) Prior to FY12 FY13 Out- Technical Scope * Develop advanced smart inverter control consisting of local droop (P-f, Q-V) control integrated with secondary closed

419

CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Iowa Stored Energy Park DOE Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Peer Review Fairmont Hotel Washington, DC September 29, 2008 Kent Holst, Development Director Iowa Stored Energy Park Funding: Congressional Ear-mark CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Today's Presentation Past Present Future Funding CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE c CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Iowa's municipal utilities saw this. 1. Economic feasibility studies. 2. Geologic research. 3. Computer modeling. CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Will ISEP make money? 1. Missouri River Energy Services. 2. Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency. CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Next steps: 1. Drill two test wells. 2. Pump tests, water & air. 3. Refine computer modeling. CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Funding 1. Municipal utilities -$1.15 million. 2. DOE - $6 million. 3. Iowa Power Fund - $3.2 million.

420

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Evaluating Utility Owned Electric ESS - Dhruv Bhatnagar, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Evaluating Utility Owned Evaluating Utility Owned Electric Energy Storage Systems: A Perspective for State Electric Utility Regulators DOE Energy Storage Program Peer Review 2012 September 28, 2012 Dhruv Bhatnagar & Verne Loose Sandia National Laboratories Motivation for this Work  Many state utility regulatory bodies are unfamiliar with electric energy storage systems  The technology  The functional uses  The value of these uses to the grid  This leads to a handicap in their proper evaluation for rate base  May prevent the best (economic) technologies from system integration 2 Source: GE What we are doing  Developing a guidebook:  Inform regulators about the system benefits of energy storage  Identify regulatory challenges to increased

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Presentation-SNL_RICA-CEDS_Peer_Review_v2a.pptx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Systems Systems 2010 Peer Review Alexandria, VA July 20-22, 2010 Co-PI: Jason Stamp, Ph.D. Co-PI: Laurie Phillips Sandia National Laboratories Reliability Impacts for Cyber Attack (RICA) Summary Slide: Reliability Impacts for Cyber Attack (RICA) Outcomes:
Quan&ta&ve
impact
analysis of
cyber
a5acks
against
power
grid control
systems
(that
affect
grid
topology and
opera&ons),
including
poten&al mi&ga&on
steps,
using
reliability
metrics. Analyze
large-scale
cases
using
simula&on soCware
in
a
High-Performance Compu&ng
(HPC)
environment. Roadmap
Challenges:
Develop
evidence- based
business
case
to
increase
and shape
investment
in
control
system security.

422

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: LIPA Smart Energy Corridor Project - Ming Mui, LIPA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Program Peer Review Meeting DE-OE0000220 LIPA Long Island Smart Energy Corridor Ming Mui and Sunil Katwala June 8, 2012 December 2008 LIPA Long Island Smart Energy Corridor Objective Life-cycle Funding ($K) Fiscal Years 2010 to 2015 DOE Funding $ 12,496K Total Project Cost $ 25,293K* Technical Scope (Insert graphic here) * Additional funding from LIPA and SUNY Research Foundation Smart Energy Corridor will: (1) Validate Smart Grid technologies; (2) Quantify Smart Grid costs and benefits; (3) Validate Smart Grid applications at a scale that can be readily adapted and replicated in individual homes and businesses. * Demonstrate Technolgy (DA, Sub Auto, AMI, DLC) * Marketing (TOU Rates, Webtools, Visualization) * Cyber Security (Vulneribility Testing & Hardening)

423

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Protocol for Measuring and Expressing Performance for ESS - Vilayanur Viswanathan, PNNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Protocol for Measuring and Expressing Protocol for Measuring and Expressing Performance for Energy Storage Systems D. Conover, V. Viswanathan, K. Bray and M. Kintner-Meyer (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory) D. Schoenwald, D. Rose, and S. Ferreira (Sandia National Laboratory) September 28, 2012 USDOE-OE ESS Peer Review Washington, DC Dr. Imre Gyuk - Energy Storage Program Manager, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Problem Statement The energy storage market is expanding, with a variety of storage technologies available The lack of a uniform way to evaluate energy storage system (ESS) performance is causing confusion in the market Without an accepted basis for comparing ESS performance, the application and use of storage technology will be hampered

424

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Nitrogen-Oxygen Battery for Large Scale Energy Storage - Frank Delnick, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

US DOE Energy Storage Systems Research Program US DOE Energy Storage Systems Research Program Peer Review, Washington, DC Sept. 26-28, 2012 Frank Delnick, David Ingersoll, Karen Waldrip, Peter Feibelman Nitrogen/Oxygen Battery A Transformational Architecture for Large Scale Energy Storage Power Sources Technology Group Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, NM SAND2012-7881P N 2 /O 2 Battery Project Overview  Air/Air battery.  N 2 electrochemistry enables the redefinition of a gas (diffusion) electrode and the three phase interface.  Operated as redox flow battery.  Provide a very high energy density, very low cost, environmentally benign electrochemical platform for load leveling and for grid-integrated storage of energy generated by wind, solar and other sustainable but intermittent sources.

425

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Sodium Intercalation Battery for Stationary Storage - David Ofer, Tiax  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sodium Intercalation Battery for Sodium Intercalation Battery for Stationary Storage Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) Peer Review and Update Meeting 2012 David Ofer Ofer.david@tiaxllc.com Washington DC, September 27, 2012 Sodium Intercalation Battery for Stationary Storage Background and Purpose 2 Large-scale stationary energy storage for integration with renewables and for off-peak energy capture is a new application requiring new rechargeable batteries. * New combination of requirements - Long cycle life under deep cycling use profile - High cycling efficiency - Moderate rate capability - Very low cost - No requirement for particularly high specific energy or energy density * TIAX is developing a novel Na-ion battery - Leverages teachings of Li-ion technology - Targets novel low-cost chemistry and cell design

426

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Wholesale Electricity Market Design Project - Jim Ellison, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Photos placed in Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Wholesale Electricity Market Design Project September 28, 2012 Jim Ellison, Verne Loose, Ray Byrne, Cesar Silva Monroy, and Ryan Elliott Sandia National Laboratories Leigh Tesfatsion Iowa State University DOE Energy Storage Program Peer Review 2012 Introduction - Motivation for a New Market Design  Need to eliminate market bias of resource classes such as Energy Storage  Need to accommodate new technologies, without the need to change market rules  Move away from resource-centric markets toward service-centric markets

427

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Sodium-based Battery Development - Dave Ingersoll, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sodium-based Battery Development Sodium-based Battery Development A Family of Batteries for Large Scale Energy Storage D. Ingersoll, C. Apblett, E. Spoerke, K. Zavadil, R. Cygan, J. Ihlefeld, F. Delnick, & T. Anderson Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM Prof. E. Wachsman University of Maryland, College Park, MD Profs. R. Kee & J. Porter, Dr. H. Zhu Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO S. Bhavaraju & M. Robins Ceramatec, Inc, Salt Lake City, UT D. Beeaff CoorsTek, Inc, Golden, CO J. Martin Boulder Ionics, Golden CO US DOE Energy Storage Systems Research Program Peer Review, Washington, DC, Sept. 26-28, 2012 Sodium-based batteries  Purpose  Demonstrate a family of sodium-based battery chemistries  sodium-iodine, sodium-bromine, sodium-air, sodium insertion, sodium-metal, etc

428

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Wind Firming EnergyFarm - Tom Stepien, Primus Power  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Wind Firming EnergyFarm DOE Peer Review September 26, 2012 2 Primus Power is on track to deliver EnergyPods TM to California's Modesto Irrigation District starting 2014 EnergyPod TM 250 kW  1 MWh PowerBox Supports 8 EnergyPods TM 3 How will storage integrate into Modesto's system? Modesto's daily load ? Storage Hydro Coal & Gas Wind Solar 4 Modesto's 25 MW McHenry solar farm 5 Modesto will use EnergyPods to integrate renewable wind and solar energy 25 MW McHenry Solar Farm 6 Modesto will use EnergyPods to integrate renewable wind and solar energy 25 MW McHenry Solar Farm 8.7 MW up in 15 min 15 MW down in 15 min 4-Aug-12 7 Modesto will use EnergyPods to integrate renewable wind and

429

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

xxxvi | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Hydrogen Production and Delivery ........................................................................................................... 7 PD-014: Hydrogen Delivery Infrastructure Analysis .................................................................................. 10 PD-022: Fiber-Reinforced Composite Pipelines ........................................................................................ 14 PD-025: Hydrogen Embrittlement of Structural Steels .............................................................................. 20

430

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ANALYSIS ANALYSIS FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report | 465 2013 - Systems Analysis Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Systems Analysis Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Systems Analysis Program: The reviewers considered the Systems Analysis program to be an essential component of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program's (the Program's) mission. The projects were considered to be appropriately diverse and focused on addressing technical barriers and meeting targets. In general, the reviewers noted that the Systems Analysis program is well managed and demonstrated the ability to address immediate analytical needs and overall objectives and plans, especially to implement the new initiative, H

431

Energy Independence and Security Act Six-Year Review of Covered...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independence and Security Act Six-Year Review of Covered Products Energy Independence and Security Act Six-Year Review of Covered Products This memorandum explains that the Energy...

432

Physics Procedia 34 (2012) 70 79 1875-3892 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V. Selection and/or peer review under responsibility of the Organising Committee of the CSP 2012  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

/or peer review under responsibility of the Organising Committee of the CSP 2012 Conference. doi:10.1016/j

Berthier, Ludovic

434

Measurement of Hydrogen Production Rate Based on Dew Point Temperatures: Independent Review  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This independent review verified Idaho National Labotory's approach of measuring the rate of hydrogen production using dew point temperatures.

Duffy, M.; Harrison, K.; Sheahen, T.

2007-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

435

INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION REVIEW AND SURVEY of the Argonne National Laboratory Building 301 Footprint  

SciTech Connect

INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION REVIEW AND SURVEY of the Argonne National Laboratory Building 301 Footprint, Argonne Illinois 5061-SR-01-0

E.N. Bailey

2010-05-26T23:59:59.000Z

436

Current (2009) State-of-the-Art Hydrogen Production Cost Estimate Using Water Electrolysis: Independent Review  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This independent review examines DOE cost targets for state-of-the art hydrogen production using water electrolysis.

Not Available

2009-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

437

Independent Oversight Review of the Idaho National Laboratory Fuel Conditioning Facility Safety Basis  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT REVIEW OF THE IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY FUEL CONDITIONING FACILITY SAFETY BASIS April 2010 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Health, Safety and Security Office of Independent Oversight i INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT REVIEW OF THE IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY FUEL CONDITIONING FACILITY SAFETY BASIS Table of Contents Acronyms ............................................................................................................................ ii Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... iii 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................1

438

Hydrogen Production Cost Estimate Using Biomass Gasification: Independent Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Hydrogen Production Cost Estimate Hydrogen Production Cost Estimate Using Biomass Gasification National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard * Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 * www.nrel.gov NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Independent Review Published for the U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program NREL/BK-6A10-51726 October 2011 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or

439

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory- July 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Implementation Verification Review at Technical Area-55

440

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

VALIDATION VALIDATION 380 | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report 2013 - Technology Validation Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Technology Validation Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Technology Validation Program: In general, the reviewers believed the program area was adequately covered. The role of the Technology Validation program within the structure of the Fuel Cell Technologies Office was clearly identified. Progress relating to projects was clearly presented and plans were identified for addressing issues and challenges. The partnership with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's (NREL's) data collection/analysis team was seen as key to the success

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Energy Sector Stakeholders Attend the Department of Energy¬タルs 2010 Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sector Stakeholders Attend the Department of Energy's Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Sector Stakeholders Attend the Department of Energy's Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Peer Review July 29, 2010 The Department of Energy conducted a Peer Review of its Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems (CEDS) Research and Development Program on July 20-22, during which 28 R&D projects were presented for review by industry stakeholders. More than 65 energy sector stakeholders came to network, present, and learn about DOE projects, while more than 20 joined in by webinar. The CEDS program's national lab, academic, and industry partners-including the National SCADA Test Bed (NSTB) partners and Trustworthy Cyber Infrastructure for the Power Grid (TCIPG) project- presented DOE-supported efforts involving secured SCADA communications and smart grid applications,

442

Independent Oversight Review, Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant- April 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review of the Integrated Safety Management System Phase I Verification Review at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant

443

Independent Oversight Review, Argonne National Laboratory- November 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review of the Argonne National Laboratory Alpha-Gamma Hot Cell Facility Readiness Assessment (Implementation Verification Review Sections)

444

2012 SG Peer Review - SDE&G Borrego Springs Microgrid - Tom Bialek, SDG&E  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review Meeting Peer Review Meeting SDG&E Borrego Springs Microgrid Demonstration Project Thomas Bialek, PhD, PE Principal Investigator June 8, 2012 December 2008 Borrego Springs Microgrid Demonstration Project Objective Life-cycle Funding ($K) Budget Period 1 FY2008 - FY2010 Budget Period 2 FY2011 - FY2013 Total DOE Funding $1,241 $6,237 $7,477 Technical Scope Conduct a pilot scale "proof-of concept" demonstration of how advanced information- based technologies and distributed energy resources (DER) may increase asset utilization and reliability of the power grid in support of the national agenda. Establish a microgrid demonstration to prove the effectiveness of integrating multiple DER technologies, energy storage, feeder automation system technologies, and outage management

445

Radioactive waste isolation in salt: Peer review of the Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation's draft report on an issues hierarchy and data needs for site characterization  

SciTech Connect

At the request of the Salt Repository Project (SRPO), Argonne National Laboratory conducted an independent peer review of a report by the Battelle Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation entitled ''Salt Repository Project Issues Hierarchy and Data Needs for Site Characterization (Draft).'' This report provided a logical structure for evaluating the outstanding questions (issues) related to selection and licensing of a site as a high-level waste repository. It also provided a first estimate of the information and data necessary to answer or resolve those questions. As such, this report is the first step in developing a strategy for site characterization. Microfiche copies of ''Draft Issues Hierarchy, Resolution Strategy, and Information Needs for Site Characterization and Environmental/Socioeconomic Evaluation - July, 1986'' and ''Issues Hierarchy and Data Needs for Site Characterization - February, 1985'' are included in the back pocket of this report.

Harrison, W.; Fenster, D.F.; Ditmars, J.D.; Paddock, R.A.; Rote, D.M.; Hambley, D.F.; Seitz, M.G.; Hull, A.B.

1986-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

446

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- July 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

447

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory- January 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility Fire Suppression System

448

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory- September 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review of the Facility Centered Assessment of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Disposition Project

449

Independent Oversight Review, Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant- January 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review of the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Work Planning and Control Activities Prior to Work Execution

450

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Operations Office- August 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review of the Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility Safety Basis and Design Development.

451

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PROGRAM COMMENTS PROGRAM COMMENTS FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report | 529 Program Comments Provided by Reviewers Hydrogen Production and Delivery Program Comments Hydrogen Production 1. Was the program area adequately covered? Were important issues and challenges identified? Was progress clearly presented in comparison to the previous year? (Include information presented in the plenary and/or session overview presentations of the program if appropriate.) The Hydrogen Production program area was very well covered-the important issues (including material performance and capital costs for all production pathways) and challenges were clearly described and progress was shown on examples for all research fields (including novel hydrogen production methods)

452

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

AND DELIVERY AND DELIVERY FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report | 7 2013 - Hydrogen Production and Delivery Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Hydrogen Production and Delivery Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Hydrogen Production and Delivery Program: This review session evaluated hydrogen production and delivery research and development (R&D) activities in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Fuel Cell Technologies Office (FCTO) in the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. The hydrogen production projects reviewed represented a diverse portfolio of technologies to produce hydrogen from renewable energy sources. Production project sub-categories included water electrolysis, solar-driven thermochemical cycles, photoelectrochemical (PEC) direct water splitting, and biological hydrogen

453

A Review of Market Monitoring Activities at U.S. Independent...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and apply mitigating measures and sanctions when applicable and authorized. A Review of Market Monitoring Activities at U.S. Independent System Operators More Documents &...

454

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory- January 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Weapons Engineering Tritium Facility Tritium Gas Containment Vital Safety System

455

Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant- December 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Low Activity Waste Melter Process System Hazards Analysis Activity

456

Report of the Peer Review Panel on the early site suitability evaluation of the Potential Repository Site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada; Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy (DOE) Yucca mountain Site Characterization Project Office (YMPO) assigned Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), the Technical and Management Support Services (T&MSS) contractor to the YmPo, the task of conducting an Early Site Suitability Evaluation (ESSE) of the Yucca mountain site as a potential site for a high-level radioactive waste repository. First, the assignment called for the development of a method to evaluate a single site against the DOE General Guidelines for Recommendation of Sites for Nuclear Waste Repositories, 10 CFR Part 960. Then, using this method, an evaluation team, the ESSE Core Team, of senior YMP scientists, engineers, and technical experts, evaluated new information obtained about the site since publication of the final Environmental Assessment (DOE, 1986) to determine if new suitability/unsuitability findings could be recommended. Finally, the Core Team identified further information and analyses needed to make final determinations for each of the guidelines. As part of the task, an independent peer review of the ESSE report has been conducted. Expertise was solicited that covered the entire spectrum of siting guidelines in 10 CFR Part 960 in order to provide a complete, in-depth critical review of the data evaluated and cited in the ESSE report, the methods used to evaluate the data, and the conclusions and recommendations offered by the report. Fourteen nationally recognized technical experts (Table 2) served on the Peer Review Panel. The comments from the Panel and the responses prepared by the ESSE Core Team, documented on formal Comment Response Forms, constitute the body of this document.

NONE

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

457

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

D: PROJECTS NOT REVIEWED D: PROJECTS NOT REVIEWED 552 | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report List of Projects Not Reviewed Project ID Project Title Principal Investigator Name Organization PD-004 Distributed Bio-Oil Reforming Stefan Czernik National Renewable Energy Laboratory PD-013 Electrolyzer Development for the Copper-Chlorine Thermochemical Cycle Michele Lewis Argonne National Laboratory PD-016 Oil-Free Centrifugal Hydrogen Compression Technology Demonstration Hooshang Heshmat Mohawk Innovative Technology PD-017 Development of a Centrifugal Hydrogen Pipeline Gas Compressor Frank Di Bella Concepts NREC PD-021 Development of High-Pressure Hydrogen Storage Tank for Storage and Gaseous Truck Delivery Don Baldwin Hexagon Lincoln PD-027 Solar High-Temperature Water Splitting

458

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

SAFETY, CODES AND STANDARDS SAFETY, CODES AND STANDARDS 402 | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report 2013 - Safety, Codes and Standards Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Safety, Codes and Standards Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Safety, Codes and Standards Program: The Safety, Codes and Standards program supports research and development (R&D) that provides the critical information needed to define requirements and close gaps in safety, codes, and standards to enable the safe use and handling of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies. The program also conducts safety activities focused on promoting safety practices among U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) projects and the development of information resources and best practices. Reviewers recognized that the program continues to provide strong support in the following

459

Independent Oversight Review of Nevada Site Office Criticality...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Safety CEF Criticality Experiments Facility CRAD Criteria and Review Approach Documents CSP Criticality Safety Plan DAF Device Assembly Facility DOE Department of Energy DSA...

460

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site- June 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review of Electrical System Configuration Management, Safety Instrumented System Commercial Grade Dedication, Setpoint Calculations, and Software Testing at the Savannah River Site, Waste Solidification Building Project

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Independent Oversight Review, Pantex Site Office- June 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review of the Pantex Site Office's Compliance with DOE Order 425.1D, Verification of Readiness to Start Up or Restart Nuclear Facilities

462

Site Visit Report - Independent Oversight Review of Work Planning...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Safety and Security (HSS) in support of the Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management (EM). The purpose of the review was to support EM management efforts to...

463

Independent Oversight Review of the Lawrence Livermore National...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- March 2001 March 2001 Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Health Services Department The Office of Environment, Safety, and Health (ES&H) Oversight...

464

Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilizati...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - December 2013 December 2013 Review of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Construction Quality This report...

465

Independent Oversight Review of the Employee Concerns Program...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Savannah River Site (SRS). This targeted review was performed at SRS from June 3 to 5, 2013. This report discusses the background, scope, methodology, results, and conclusions of...

466

Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Transuranic Waste Processing...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oak Ridge Transuranic Waste Processing Center, September 2013 September 2013 Review of Management of Safety Systems at the Oak Ridge Transuranic Waste Processing Center and...

467

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Painesville Municipal Electric Power Vanadium Redox Battery Demo Project - Jodi Startari, Ashlawn Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Electric Power Electric Power Vanadium Redox Battery Demonstration Project Jodi Startari Ashlawn Energy LLC Briefing Overview * Painesville Municipal Electric Power Plant Project Synopsis * Vanadium Redox Flow Battery Technology * City of Painesville Municipal Electric Plant History * Project Multiple Objectives and Additional Detail * Project Risk Analysis presented at previous Peer Review * Project to date progress * Cost Distribution * Summary/Conclusions * Future Tasks * Questions US Produced Vanadium Redox Flow Battery for Bulk Storage, Peak Shaving * 8 MW Hour redox flow battery (1MW 8 hours) * To be installed at Painesville Municipal Electric Plant (PMEP), a 32 MW coal fired facility * Most efficient PMEP operation is steady state at 26 MW (lowest emissions, lowest operating cost)

468

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

TRANSFORMATION TRANSFORMATION 442 | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report 2013 - Market Transformation Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Market Transformation Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Market Transformation Program: The purpose of the Market Transformation program is to spur market growth for domestically produced hydrogen and fuel cell systems. By supporting increased sales in key early markets, this program helps to identify and overcome non-technical barriers to commercial deployment and to reduce the life cycle costs of fuel cell power by helping to achieve economies of scale. The current focus of the Market Transformation program is to build on past successes in lift truck and emergency backup power applications (part of the U.S. Department of Energy's [DOE's]

469

Peering Information  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Peering Information Network Overview Tools Peering Information Interactive Network Map Network Maps Connected Sites Contact Us Technical Assistance: 1 800-33-ESnet (Inside the US)...

470

Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Site CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site CH2M Hill Plateau Site CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company - November 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Site CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company - November 2012 November 2012 Review of the Hanford Site CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company Implementation Verification Review Processes This report documents the independent review of implementation verification review (IVR) processes at the Hanford Site CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company that were conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), which is within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The onsite review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations from August 13 to17, 2012. The objective of this assessment was to evaluate

471

Independent Oversight Follow-up Review, Department of Energy Complex - May  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Follow-up Review, Department of Energy Independent Oversight Follow-up Review, Department of Energy Complex - May 2000 Independent Oversight Follow-up Review, Department of Energy Complex - May 2000 May 2000 Follow-up Review of Emergency Management Programs in the Department of Energy Complex The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is required to maintain a comprehensive emergency management system to ensure that DOE is prepared to protect workers, the public, the environment, and national security in the event of an accident or emergency. Following a chemical explosion at DOE's Hanford site in May 1997, an independent oversight evaluation of emergency management programs across the DOE complex was conducted. That evaluation, completed in early 1998, concluded that, despite a series of 1997 Secretarial initiatives on emergency management, the programs at DOE

472

Westinghouse independent safety review of Savannah River production reactors  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Westinghouse Electric Corporation has performed a safety assessment of the Savannah River production reactors (K,L, and P) as requested by the US Department of Energy. This assessment was performed between November 1, 1988, and April 1, 1989, under the transition contract for the Westinghouse Savannah River Company's preparations to succeed E.I. du Pont de Nemours Company as the US Department of Energy contractor for the Savannah River Project. The reviewers were drawn from several Westinghouse nuclear energy organizations, embody a combination of commercial and government reactor experience, and have backgrounds covering the range of technologies relevant to assessing nuclear safety. The report presents the rationale from which the overall judgment was drawn and the basis for the committee's opinion on the phased restart strategy proposed by E.I. du Pont de Nemours Company, Westinghouse, and the US Department of Energy-Savannah River. The committee concluded that it could recommend restart of one reactor at partial power upon completion of a list of recommended upgrades both to systems and their supporting analyses and after demonstration that the organization had assimilated the massive changes it will have undergone.

Leggett, W.D.; McShane, W.J. (Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA (USA)); Liparulo, N.J.; McAdoo, J.D.; Strawbridge, L.E. (Westinghouse Electric Corp., Pittsburgh, PA (USA). Nuclear and Advanced Technology Div.); Toto, G. (Westinghouse Electric Corp., Pittsburgh, PA (USA). Nuclear Services Div.); Fauske, H.K. (Fauske and Associates, Inc., Burr Ridge, IL (USA)); Call, D.W. (Westinghouse Savannah R

1989-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

473

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Estimation of Capital and Levelized Cost for Redox Flow Batteries - Vilayanur Viswanathan, PNNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Estimation of Capital and Levelized Estimation of Capital and Levelized Cost for Redox Flow Batteries V. Viswanathan, A. Crawford, L. Thaller 1 , D. Stephenson, S. Kim, W. Wang, G. Coffey, P. Balducci, Z. Gary Yang 2 , Liyu Li 2 , M. Kintner-Meyer, V. Sprenkle 1 Consultant 2 UniEnergy Technology September 28, 2012 USDOE-OE ESS Peer Review Washington, DC Dr. Imre Gyuk - Energy Storage Program Manager, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability 1 What are we trying to accomplish? PNNL grid analytics team has established ESS cost targets for various applications PNNL cost/performance model estimates cost for redox flow battery systems of various chemistries drives research internally to focus on most important components/parameters/metrics for cost reduction and performance improvement

474

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

A: ATTENDEE LIST A: ATTENDEE LIST FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report | 511 Attendee List: 2013 Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Last Name First Name Organization Abdel-Baset Tarek Chrysler Group LLC Abraham Judi Conference Management Associates, Inc. Aceves Salvador Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Adams Jesse U.S. Department of Energy, Golden Field Office Adzic Radosl