Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Final Independent External Peer Review Report Independent External Peer Review (IEPR),  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Final Independent External Peer Review Report Independent External Peer Review (IEPR), Delta Independent External Peer Review Report Independent External Peer Review (IEPR), Delta Islands and Levees External Peer Review Report Independent External Peer Review (IEPR), Delta Islands and Levees Feasibility

US Army Corps of Engineers

2

IndependentPeerReviewProgram.pdf | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

IndependentPeerReviewProgram.pdf IndependentPeerReviewProgram.pdf More Documents & Publications Project Peer Reviews Peer Review 2014 Wind Program Peer Review Report Cover...

3

Enclosure 3 Independent External Peer Review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Enclosure 3 Summary of Independent External Peer Review Final Panel Comments November 5, 2010 #12 5, 2010 Summary of Independent External Peer Review Final Panel Comments EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Type I independent external peer reviews (IEPRs) assess the economic, engineering, and environmental aspects

US Army Corps of Engineers

4

NETL: Independent Peer Reviews of NETL Technology Programs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Peer Reviews Peer Reviews Coal and Power Systems Independent Peer Reviews of NETL Technology Programs NETL is conducting a series of independent Peer Reviews of its Strategic Center for Coal Technology Programs in accordance with Departmental guidelines. Using a standard set of selection criteria, each technology program selects between 15 and 20 projects to be peer reviewed that represent the program's project portfolio and a significant portion of their fiscal year budget. Selected projects undergo a rigorous review during which the Principal Investigators summarize the status of their research, accomplishments, and future planned activities to an independent panel of experts. Projects are evaluated using a standard set of metrics to assess the progress of the Project Team towards achieving the Statements of Project Objectives as well as specific project milestones of the research. Following the Peer Review, NETL uses the results to guide and redirect the projects, as appropriate, underscoring NETL's commitment to funding and managing a portfolio of high-quality research.

5

CIE Report Riegl 1 EXTERNAL INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW OF THE STATUS REVIEW OF 82 CORAL  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

CIE Report Riegl 1 EXTERNAL INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW OF THE STATUS REVIEW OF 82 CORAL SPECIES UNDER that administers independent peer reviews for the NMFS Office of Science and Technology. Solicited was an independent peer review to be submitted to the CIE and to be approved by the CIE steering committee. Content

6

Final Independent External Peer Review Report Engineering, Economic, and Environmental Review of  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Final Independent External Peer Review Report Engineering, Economic, and Environmental Review-TERM ANALYSIS SERVICE (STAS) on Final Independent External Peer Review Report Engineering, Economic St. Louis LRR IEPR i Battelle Final IEPR Report August 3, 2010 FINAL INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL PEER REVIEW

US Army Corps of Engineers

7

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: Independent Peer Reviews  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Delivery Hydrogen Storage Hydrogen Manufacturing Fuel Cells Applications/Technology Validation Safety Codes and Standards Education Basic Research Systems Analysis Systems Integration Independent Reviews Macro-System Model U.S. Department of Energy Search help Home > Systems Integration > Independent Peer Reviews Printable Version Independent Peer Reviews DOE's Systems Integrator convenes independent technical reviews to gauge progress toward meeting specific technical targets and to provide technical information necessary for key decisions. These independent reviews are important to the program: They provide an unbiased understanding of the status of the program's technical targets based on the input of independent technical experts. This understanding is critical to program decision-making, budget

8

June 28, 2013 Final Independent External Peer Review Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

June 28, 2013 Final Independent External Peer Review Report Upper Des Plaines River and Tributaries Des Plaines Phase II Study IEPR Final IEPR Report #12;Upper Des Plaines IEPR Final IEPR Report Review Report Upper Des Plaines River and Tributaries, Illinois and Wisconsin Feasibility Study (Phase II

US Army Corps of Engineers

9

Final Independent External Peer Review Report for the Engineering and Economic  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Final Independent External Peer Review Report for the Engineering and Economic Reevaluation Independent External Peer Review Report for the Engineering and Economic Reevaluation of the Geotechnical Report June 10, 2009 FINAL INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL PEER REVIEW REPORT of the Engineering and Economic

US Army Corps of Engineers

10

Independent External Peer Review Report Rough River Dam 18 August 2011 ii  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

#12;Independent External Peer Review Report ­ Rough River Dam 18 August 2011 ii This page intentionally blank. #12;Independent External Peer Review Report ­ Rough River Dam 18 August 2011 iii Table.3 Preparation and Charge for Peer Review Panel 7 3.4 Performing the IEPR 8 3.5 Preparation and Review of Draft

US Army Corps of Engineers

11

Project Peer Reviews | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Peer Reviews Project Peer Reviews ProjectPeerReviews.pdf More Documents & Publications IndependentPeerReviewProgram.pdf Peer Review EERE Program Management Guide - Appendix D...

12

Independent External Peer Review Report Wood River 19 August 2011 ii  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

#12;Independent External Peer Review Report ­ Wood River 19 August 2011 ii Table of Contents List.3 Preparation and Charge for Peer Review Panel 6 3.4 Performing the IEPR 7 3.5 Preparation of Comments and Panel IEPR Process 5 Figure 3. IEPR Team 9 #12;Independent External Peer Review Report ­ Wood River 19 August

US Army Corps of Engineers

13

Independent External Peer Review Rio Grande Floodway, San Acacia to Bosque Del Apache,  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Independent External Peer Review Rio Grande Floodway, San Acacia to Bosque Del Apache, New Mexico. 1) Contract No. W912HQ-11-D-0002 10 August 2012 #12;Independent External Peer Review Report (Rev. 1 of Panel 6 3.3 Preparation and Charge for Peer Review Panel 7 3.4 Performing the IEPR 8 3

US Army Corps of Engineers

14

Independent External Peer Review Report Green Bay 20 June 2011 ii  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

#12;Independent External Peer Review Report ­ Green Bay 20 June 2011 ii Table of Contents List for Peer Review Panel 6 3.4 Performing the IEPR 7 3.5 Preparation of Comments and Panel Consensus Process 4 Figure 3. IEPR Team 9 #12;Independent External Peer Review Report ­ Green Bay 20 June 2011 iii

US Army Corps of Engineers

15

Independent External Peer Review Report ACT River Basin 2 July 2013 ii  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

#12;Independent External Peer Review Report ­ ACT River Basin 2 July 2013 ii Table of Contents List of Panel 6 3.3 Preparation and Charge for Peer Review Panel 7 3.4 Performing the IEPR 7 3.5 Panel Consensus 9 #12;Independent External Peer Review Report ­ ACT River Basin 2 July 2013 iii List of Tables Table

US Army Corps of Engineers

16

Independent External Peer Review Report Lower Snake River 24 May 2013 ii  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

#12;Independent External Peer Review Report ­ Lower Snake River 24 May 2013 ii Table of Contents and Schedule 9 3.2 Selection of Panel 10 3.3 Preparation and Charge for Peer Review Panel 11 3 of Interest Questionnaire D-1 List of Figures Figure 1. IEPR Team 14 #12;Independent External Peer Review

US Army Corps of Engineers

17

Final Independent External Peer Review for the Biscayne Bay Coastal Wetlands Project  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Final Independent External Peer Review for the Biscayne Bay Coastal Wetlands Project Implementation-TERM ANALYSIS SERVICE (STAS) on Final Independent External Peer Review Report Biscayne Bay Coastal Wetlands COASTAL WETLANDS PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Biscayne Bay Coastal Wetlands (BBCW

US Army Corps of Engineers

18

Final Independent External Peer Review Report Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel,  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Environmental Impact Statement EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project Background and Purpose The Sacramento River Deep WaterFinal Independent External Peer Review Report Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, California Peer Review Report of the Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, California Limited Reevaluation

US Army Corps of Engineers

19

Peer Review  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Peer Review ... Peer review, as used here, refers to the evaluation of research (primarily basic research) proposals by scientists who are the professional peers of the investigator seeking a grant. ...

HOWARD J. SANDERS

1982-03-15T23:59:59.000Z

20

Final Independent External Peer Review Report Cache la Poudre at Greeley, Colorado  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Final Independent External Peer Review Report Cache la Poudre at Greeley, Colorado General Report Cache la Poudre at Greeley, Colorado General Investigation Feasibility Study Prepared by Battelle at Greeley, Colorado General Investigation Feasibility Study Executive Summary PROJECT BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

US Army Corps of Engineers

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Comments of the Independent Peer-Review Team for the Draft Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Comments of the Independent Peer-Review Team for the Draft Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps individual reports were submitted by the four members of the Independent Peer-Review Team for the draft to the peer-review comments were developed by ERDC in cooperation with the Caribbean Islands working group

US Army Corps of Engineers

22

Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Reviews IndependentPeerReviewProgram.pdf 2014 Water Power Peer Review Report Cover Geothermal Home About the Geothermal Technologies Office Enhanced Geothermal Systems...

23

1 April 5, 2012 minor correction as tracked change (p. 2) Report on Special Independent Peer Review of the  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

threats to this species. In consideration of substantial disagreement evident in peer review and public conducted special independent peer review of the sections of the status review report related to the disagreement. For this special peer review, we recruited three scientists with marine mammal expertise

24

Final Independent External Peer Review Report for the Savannah Harbor Expansion Project  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

for the Savannah Harbor Expansion Project General Reevaluation Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Savannah Harbor is a deep and 600 feet wide from deep water in the ocean (River Mile 11.4B) to the channel between the jettiesFinal Independent External Peer Review Report for the Savannah Harbor Expansion Project General

US Army Corps of Engineers

25

Peer Review Summary Document Peer Review Plan  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary Document (1/9/2012) Peer Review Plan http://www.usgs.gov/peer_review of Hawai`i Economic Research Organization). Peer Reviewers Expertise and Credentials Peer Reviewer #1 ­ Ph of terrestrial ecosystems in Hawaii and Pacific islands. Peer Reviewer #2 ­ Ph.D. in Botany, Emeritus Professor

Torgersen, Christian

26

Peer Review Summary Document Peer Review Plan  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary Document (12/11/13) Peer Review Plan http://www.usgs.gov/peer_review.S. Dalyander, J.W. Long, N.G. Plant, and D.M. Thompson. Peer Reviewers Expertise and Credentials Reviewer #1 of sediment during and after storms. Peer Reviewer #1 has also conducted research into the behavior of oil

Torgersen, Christian

27

Peer Review Summary Document Peer Review Plan  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary Document (9/17/13) Peer Review Plan http://www.usgs.gov/peer_review, and D.M. Thompson. Peer Reviewers Expertise and Credentials Reviewer #1 received PhD and MS degrees storms. Peer Reviewer #1's research has been funded primarily by the Office of Naval Research, the U

Torgersen, Christian

28

Comments of the Independent Peer-Review Team for the Arid West Regional Supplement to the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Comments of the Independent Peer-Review Team for the Arid West Regional Supplement to the 1987 Working Group Comments and recommendations developed by the peer-review team are given in Columns B reviews were performed in accordance with OMB guidelines." OMB guidelines were not available to the Peer

US Army Corps of Engineers

29

Independent External Peer Review of the Limited Reevaluation Report Design Deficiency Corrections, Prairie du Pont and Fish Lake  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, Prairie du Pont and Fish Lake St. Clair and Monroe Counties, Illinois Contract No. W912HQ-11-R-0002 6 September 2012 #12;Independent External Peer Review Report ­ Prairie du Pont and Fish Lake 6 September 2012) in Water Resources Projects 2 2 Prairie du Pont and Fish Lake LRR Project Description 2 3 IEPR Process 5 3

US Army Corps of Engineers

30

Peer Reviews | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Peer Reviews Peer Reviews February 20, 2014 Investigation Peer Review 2012 Report on the Quality Assessment Review of the Investigative Outcomes of the Office of Inspector General...

31

Peer Review Marek J. Druzdzel  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Marek J. Druzdzel with minor additions from Peter Brusilovsky University of Pittsburgh://www.pitt.edu/~druzdzel Peer Review Peer Review Overview · Peer review · How to do it well? · Concluding remarks #12;Peer Review Peer review Peer review is used in: 1.Publishing research results 2.Awarding of funding

Brusilovsky, Peter

32

Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Peer Review Peer Review Summary In response to the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) "Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" (the Bulletin), the Department of...

33

PEER REVIEW PROGRAM  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Institute for Regulatory Science (RS) and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) jointly estab lished a peer-review program. As the program evolved, four types of review were established. A process for stakeholder participation in peer review eetings was also developed. While a committee established by the ASME provided oversight to the peer-review process, the RSI managed the day-to-day operations of peer review panels. In addition to the reports resulting from peer review of specific projects, several documents were prepared to facilitate the review process, all of which were widely distributed.

MOGHISSI, A ALAN; LOVE, BETTY R; STRAJA, SORIN R

2007-09-29T23:59:59.000Z

34

2011 Biomass Program Plaform Peer Review: Analysis | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Plaform Peer Review: Analysis 2011 Biomass Program Plaform Peer Review: Analysis This document summarizes the recommendations and evaluations provided by an independent external...

35

NIH Peer Review Reform  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...EDITOR LETTER TO THE EDITOR NIH Peer Review Reform Marc C. Torjman Phone...Camden, NJ 08103 The editorial NIH Peer Review Reform-Change We Need, or Lipstick...better exposed the problems of grant peer review and, more importantly, the irreparable...

Marc C. Torjman

2009-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

36

ORISE: Peer Review Management  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Management Man participating in a peer review The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) ensures that scientific reviews are conducted in a professional manner and...

37

ORISE: Peer Review Expert Identification  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Expert Identification Two peer review experts discussing the review topic Effective peer review management requires finding academic reviewers or other experts and recruiting them...

38

Involving students in peer review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Involving students in peer review Case studies and practical strategies for university teaching Jon......................................................................................................................................................2 1. WHAT IS STUDENT PEER REVIEW? A CONCISE REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE....................3 BENEFITS OF PEER REVIEW

Pearce, Jon

39

ORISE: Peer Review Process Improvement  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Process Improvement Two men discuss ways to improve peer review processes After finding academic reviewers and conducting peer reviews, the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and...

40

BROUHAHA OVER PEER REVIEW  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

BROUHAHA OVER PEER REVIEW ... And it involves a collaborative process through which reports, and even the science itself, are revisitedand, with hope, improvedin response to reviewer comments. ... And increasingly, regulatory agencies are peer reviewing scientific documents, such as risk assessments, that guide establishment of rules and standards. ...

CHERYL HOGUE

2004-02-02T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

2015 Project Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Bioenergy Technologies Office is hosting the 2015 Peer Review on March 2327, 2015, at the Hilton Mark Center, in Alexandria, Virginia.

42

Peer Review of Standards Rulemaking  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CHARGE CHARGE The Department of Energy (DOE) conducted the peer reviews in accordance with the requirements outlined in Bulletin from OMB (Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/fy2005/m05-03.pdf). The selection of reviewers, including consideration of expertise, panel balance, conflicts of interest, and independence; employment of the peer review mechanisms (e.g., letter reviews, panels, etc.); and maintenance of transparency of the review process were in compliance with OMB guidance. DOE assembled a panel of experts to review the analysis used in the standards rulemaking process. The peer review panel consisted of seven reviewers DOE determined to be qualified to evaluate the assigned group of analyses, in accordance with the Bulletin. Each group of analyses displayed some technical diversity. Therefore, in

43

Challenging Peer Review  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Challenging Peer Review ... Eliminating what he sees as wasteful spending and adding new criteria to peer review of National Science Foundation grants are on the agenda of Rep. Lamar S. Smith (R-Texas), chair of the House of Representatives Science, Space & Technology Committee. ...

ANDREA WIDENER

2013-05-06T23:59:59.000Z

44

EMSL: External Peer Reviewers  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

EXTERNAL PEER REVIEWERS EXTERNAL PEER REVIEWERS Additional Information User Portal 2014 Call for Proposals 2014 Proposal Guidance 2014 Proposal Review Criteria Guidance for Letters of Intent to JGI-EMSL Collaborative Science Call Guidance for Full Proposals to JGI-EMSL Collaborative Science Call (Invited Only) 2014 Proposal Planning 2014 Proposal Summary/Extension Previous Calls External Peer Reviewers Fellowships and Awards Nufo, logo External peer reviewers are valuable contributors to EMSL's user proposals process. They provide objective evaluations of the quality of the proposals according to established review criteria, and participate on Review Panels that calibrate the proposals into a ranked order. EMSL is truly grateful to the researchers who donated their time and efforts in fiscal year 2012 to

45

2015 GTO Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The annual Peer Review offers geothermal stakeholders an opportunity to learn about the projects funded by DOE across a wide spectrum of technical complexity and funding magnitude, from research...

46

Peer Review Oct 2005  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Peer Review Oct 2006.ppt | 10/17/2006 Peer Review Oct 2006.ppt | 10/17/2006 BOEING is a trademark of Boeing Management Company. Copyright © 2004 Boeing. All rights reserved. Superconducting Flywheel Development Phil Johnson FESS Program Manager Boeing Phantom Works DOE Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review Boeing Technology | Phantom Works Superconducting Flywheel Development Peer Review Oct 2006.ppt | 2 Copyright © 2004 Boeing. All rights reserved. 50kW / 5kWh Flywheel Energy Storage System Off-Grid Demo System Objective: *Design, build and deliver a flywheel energy storage system tailored for off- grid applications utilizing a High Temperature Superconducting (HTS) Bearing Goal: *Successfully integrate the FESS system into a demonstration site One of three deployment options for the demo system, shown in relation to

47

2013 Geothermal Technologies Office Peer Review Technical Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The 2013 Geothermal Technologies Office Peer Review Report is now available for download. The report provides a summary and compilation of expert, independent technical feedback on GTO-funded projects, as well as feedback from the Peer Review reviewers.

48

Peer review under review: room for improvement?  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The peer review process is a central part of medicine ... Although generally considered essential to academic quality, peer review has been increasingly criticised as ineffective, slow...

E. E. van der Wall

2009-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

49

Peer Review Improves Undergraduate Science Writing Skills  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's ownI.D. #s_________________ Peer Review Worksheet 0 = N/A, 1=Instructor Guidebook Peer Review Improves Undergraduate

Conte, Debra

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

50

January 2009 Peer Review Enhancements  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

January 2009 Peer Review Enhancements: Info for Reviewers At-A-Glance Changes for NIH Fiscal Year 2010 The NIH is implementing a number of changes to the peer review process, beginning reviewers prepare for the next round of peer review meetings (~May/June 2009). More specific information

Bandettini, Peter A.

51

2015 Project Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) is hosting the 2015 Peer Review on March 2327, 2015, at the Hilton Mark Center, in Alexandria, Virginia. Approximately 185 projects in BETOs research, development, and demonstration portfolio will be presented to the public and systematically reviewed by external subject-matter experts from industry, academia, and federal agencies.

52

Peer review statement  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the proceedings Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.

53

Peer review statement  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the proceedings Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.

54

Peer review statement  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the proceedings Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.

55

Geothermal Technologies Program Annual Peer Review Presentation...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Annual Peer Review Presentation By Doug Hollett Geothermal Technologies Program Annual Peer Review Presentation By Doug Hollett 2012 Peer Review presentation by Doug Hollett,...

56

Consensus Science and the Peer Review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Consensus Science and the Peer Review Jorge R. Barriocrisis in the scientific and medical peer review system.Although peer review may be considered one of the sacred

Barrio, Jorge R.

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

57

Peer Review 2013 | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Conferences & Meetings Meetings Peer Review 2013 Peer Review 2013 2013 Project Peer Review In the spring and summer of 2013, the Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO)...

58

AVIAN/WIND STATISTICAL PEER REVIEW PROJECT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

AVIAN/WIND STATISTICAL PEER REVIEW PROJECT Prepared for: California Energy Commission Prepared by............................................................................................................................................ 1 SELECTION OF PEER REVIEW TEAMS .............................................................................................................................. 2 TECHNICAL EXPERTISE OF PEER REVIEW TEAMS

59

Nepotism and sexism in peer-review In the first-ever analysis of peer-review scores for postdoctoral fellowship applications, the  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Nepotism and sexism in peer-review In the first-ever analysis of peer-review scores decided to investigate whether the peer- review system of the Swedish Medical Research Council (MRC), one suggests that peer reviewers cannot judge scientific merit independent of gender. The peer reviewers over

McKinley, Kathryn S.

60

The Importance of Peer Review  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The Importance of Peer Review ... Because it requires reviewers and Editors to make judgments and to evaluate and criticize the work of their peers, the Editors carefully choose reviewers using the following criteria: ... Often the authors of a manuscript that is rejected benefit most from these peer reviews that describe shortcomings and approaches to resolving them. ...

Heijia L. Wheeler; Willis B. Wheeler Associate Editorial Office Journal of Agricultural; Food Chemistry

2006-11-22T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

UNIVERSITY OF NCURA PEER REVIEW  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA NCURA PEER REVIEW FINAL REPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2012 N a t i o n a l C o u n the charge to the reviewers and the approach utilized during the peer review. The section on National followed by a set of recommendations and rationale for the recommendation being made. #12;NCURA Peer Review

Vonessen, Nikolaus

62

Peer Review Oct 2005  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Peer Review Sept , 2008 Peer Review Sept , 2008 Design, Fabrication, and Test of a 5 kWh Flywheel Energy Storage System Utilizing a High Temperature Superconducting Magnetic Bearing - Phase III Boeing Technology | Phantom Works Superconducting Flywheel Development 2 Copyright © 2004 Boeing. All rights reserved. Flywheel Energy Storage Systems Objective: *Design, build and deliver flywheel energy storage systems utilizing high temperature superconducting (HTS) bearings tailored for uninterruptible power systems and off-grid applications Goal: *Successfully integrate FESS into a demonstration site through cooperative agreements with DOE and contracts with Sandia National Labs Deployment of a demo system, shown in relation to diesel genset and balance of system. Over All Status:

63

2007 Annual Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2007 Annual Peer Review 2007 Annual Peer Review September 27, 2007 San Francisco, California Welcoming Remarks Imre Gyuk US Dept. of Energy DOE / ESS Program Overview (View .pdf) John Boyes Sandia National Laboratories PRESENTATIONS\ ECONOMICS - BENEFIT STUDIES Evaluating Value Propositions for Four Modular Electricity Storage Demonstrations in California (View .pdf) Jim Eyer (Distributed Utility Assoc.) Update on Benefit and Cost Comparison of Modular Energy Storage Technologies for Four Viable Value Propositions (View .pdf) Susan Schoenung (Longitude 122 West, Inc.) ECONOMICS - ENVIRONMENT BENEFITS STUDIES Emissions from Traditional & Flywheel Plants for Regulation Services (View .pdf) Rick Fioravanti (KEMA, Inc.) UTILITY & COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS OF ADVANCED ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS

64

Nuclear waste peer review 'needs more transparency'  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... [LONDON] Scientists advising the UK government on radioactive waste disposal have called on the ... disposal have called on the waste management agency Nirex to open up its peer-review arrangements to independent scrutiny if it ...

Ehsan Masood

1997-01-23T23:59:59.000Z

65

MELCOR Peer Review  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

MELCOR is a fully integrated, engineering-level computer code that models the progression of severe accidents in light water reactor nuclear power plants. The newest version of MELCOR is Version 1.8.1, July 1991. MELCOR development has reached the point that the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission sponsored a broad technical review by recognized experts to determine or confirm the technical adequacy of the code for the serious and complex analyses it is expected to perform. For this purpose, an eight-member MELCOR Peer Review Committee was organized. The Committee has completed its review of the MELCOR code: the review process and findings of the MELCOR Peer Review Committee are documented in this report. The Committee has determined that recommendations in five areas are appropriate: (1) MELCOR numerics, (2) models missing from MELCOR Version 1.8.1, (3) existing MELCOR models needing revision, (4) the need for expanded MELCOR assessment, and (5) documentation.

Boyack, B.E. [Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States); Dhir, V.K. [Santa Monica, CA. (United States); Gieseke, J.A. [Battelle, Columbus, OH (United States); Haste, T.J. [AEA Technology, Winfrith (United Kingdom); Kenton, M.A. [Gabor, Kenton and Associates, Inc., Westmont, IL (United States); Khatib-Rahbar, M. [Energy Research, Inc., Rockville, MD (United States); Leonard, M.T. [Science Applications International Corp., Wolfheze (Netherlands); Viskanta, R. [Purdue Univ., Lafayette, IN (United States). Heat Transfer Lab.

1992-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

66

Peer Review Summary Document (February 8, 2013)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary Document (February 8, 2013) Peer Review Plan http://www.usgs.gov/peer_review. Peer Reviewers Expertise and Credentials Names and biographies of the six peer reviewers are available in Appendix A of the report titled: Peer Review Panel Report on Draft Klamath Dam Removal Overview Report

Torgersen, Christian

67

Peer Review Oct 2005  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Peer Review - DOE Peer Review - Sept, 2007 Design, Fabrication, and Test of a 5 kWh Flywheel Energy Storage System Utilizing a High Temperature Superconducting Magnetic Bearing - Phase III Boeing Technology | Phantom Works Copyright © 2004 Boeing. All rights reserved. Superconducting Flywheel Development 2 Flywheel Energy Storage Systems Objective: *Design, build and deliver flywheel energy storage systems utilizing high temperature superconducting (HTS) bearings tailored for uninterruptible power systems and off-grid applications Goal: *Successfully integrate FESS into a demonstration site through cooperative agreements with DOE and contracts with Sandia National Labs Deployment of a demo system, shown in relation to diesel genset and balance of system. Status: *The 1 kWh / 3 kW test was successful

68

Peer Review Summary (5/13/2014)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary (5/13/2014) Peer Review Plan http://www.usgs.gov/peer_review, by Peter C. Van Metre and Barbara J. Mahler. Peer Reviewers' Expertise and Credentials Reviewer #1. Reviewers #2-5: Are four anonymous peer reviewers chosen by the scientific journal Environmental Science

Torgersen, Christian

69

2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Biochemical Conversion...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Biochemical Conversion 2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Biochemical Conversion This document summarizes the recommendations and evaluations provided by an independent...

70

2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Infrastructure | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Infrastructure 2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Infrastructure This document summarizes the recommendations and evaluations provided by an independent external panel of...

71

2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Sustainability | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Sustainability 2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Sustainability "This document summarizes the recommendations and evaluations provided by an independent external panel of...

72

2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Feedstock | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Feedstock 2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Feedstock This document summarizes the recommendations and evaluations provided by an independent external panel of experts at...

73

Audit Peer Review 2012 | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

12 Audit Peer Review 2012 September 30, 2012 Subject: Department of Energy, Peer Review for the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2012 Reviewer: Treasury Inspector General for Tax...

74

Audit Peer Review 2009 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

09 Audit Peer Review 2009 September 30, 2009 Subject: Department of Energy, Peer Review for the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2009 Reviewer: Social Security Administration,...

75

2013 Peer Review Report | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Peer Review Report 2013 Peer Review Report Review Panel Summary Report and Project Results 2013peerreview.pdf More Documents & Publications Algal Biofuels: Long-Term Energy...

76

Preparing Students for Peer Review.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

?? In order to enhance the effective use of peer review, I have developed materials to assist teachers in compliance with the standards for Masters' (more)

McMurry, Alison Irvine

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

77

Peer Review Summary Document (May 22, 2008)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary Document (May 22, 2008) Peer Review Plan Synthesis and Assessment Product 3.4: Abrupt Climate Change [20 KB PDF]. Peer Reviewers Information Names and biographies of peer reviewers [56 KB PDF] for Synthesis and Assessment Product (SAP) 3.4. Charge Submitted to Peer Reviewers Charge

Torgersen, Christian

78

A normative model of peer review: qualitative assessment of manuscript reviewers attitudes towards peer review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

my own skills Course on peer review skills Special rates forR, Simon G. Chance and consensus in peer review. Science.Emanuel L, Greenland P. Peer Review and Professionalism at

Tercier, John; Callaham, Michael L.

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

79

Peer Review Summary Document (November 12, 2008)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary Document (November 12, 2008) Peer Review Plan Synthesis and Assessment Product 4.2: Thresholds of Climate Change in Ecosystems [20 KB PDF]. Peer Reviewers Information Names and biographies of peer reviewers [33 KB PDF] for Synthesis and Assessment Product 4.2 Charge Submitted to Peer

Torgersen, Christian

80

FEMP Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

FEMP Peer Review FEMP Peer Review Report summarizes the findings of the Federal Energy Management Program Peer Review Panel conducted over a three-day period in September 2005....

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

2013 Peer Review Agenda | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2013 Peer Review Agenda 2013 Peer Review Agenda Agenda for the 2013 Peer Review meeting on April 22-25, 2013, held in Denver, Colorado. peerreviewagenda2013.pdf More Documents &...

82

Peer review in child protection  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract Safeguarding children work is complex and challenging. Peer review provides a forum for paediatricians to discuss child protection cases to ensure the management of the child meets accepted standards of practice. The process involves retrospective review of cases, photo documentation, the medical report and multiagency working. It provides a culture of learning, professional development and support, with an opportunity to discuss cases in a suitable environment and to debrief following difficult cases. Clinical governance frameworks identify the importance of peer review and clinical supervision: there are increasing expectations that Health Trusts/Boards will have to provide data on attendance for external review. Both clinical supervision and peer review are forms of reflective practice and developmental activities that give practitioners the opportunity to learn from their experience and develop their expertise within clinical practice. Child protection peer review meetings with clear terms of reference should be set up in all health organisations employing paediatricians working in child protection. All paediatricians should be able to access and attend child protection peer review, supervision and support which should be identified in their job plans. Peer review is recognised as Continual Professional Development. Following discussion any change in opinion is the lead consultant's responsibility. It must be clear that peer review supports the responsible paediatrician in reaching a conclusion and does not provide a formal second opinion to be used in court. Peer review has a role to play in maintaining public and court confidence. It is the paediatrician's attendance at peer review that provides assurance to court that standards are being met, not that the specific case has been peer reviewed. Clinicians who don't attend are at risk of being perceived as maverick.

Alison Mott; Amanda Thomas

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

83

CARD No. 27 Peer Review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

CARD No. 27 Peer Review 27.A.1 BACKGROUND The Compliance Criteria require DOE to conduct peer can confirm the adequacy of various decisions and interpretations made by DOE in its Compliance's Background Information Document for 40 CFR 194, p. 7-2 (EPA 1996). EPA's review of DOE's compliance

84

2012 Peer Review Overview Agenda | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2012 Peer Review Overview Agenda 2012 Peer Review Overview Agenda Agenda for May 7-11, 2012 Peer Review Meeting peerreviewagenda.pdf More Documents & Publications 2013 Peer...

85

Biomass Program Peer Review Sustainability Platform | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Program Peer Review Sustainability Platform Biomass Program Peer Review Sustainability Platform Presentation on the Update to the Billion-Ton Study, including differences between...

86

2011 Peer Review Meeting | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

1 Peer Review Meeting 2011 Peer Review Meeting In June 2011, the U.S. Department of Energy Geothermal Technologies Office (GTO) (formerly Geothermal Technologies Program) held...

87

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 Presentations 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations The Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review included seven...

88

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 Presentations 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review included seven...

89

FEMP Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Panel Report Panel Report September 20-21, 2005 FEMP PEER REVIEW PANEL Paul DeCotis, Chair New York State Energy Research and Development Authority Floyd E. Barwig Iowa Energy Center Richard S. Brent Solar Turbines, Inc. Bruce Gross Dominion Federal Corporation Kenneth L. James Pacific Gas and Electric Company Meg Matt The Matt Group Richard A. Morgan Morgan Marketing Partners Francis J. Murray, Jr. Energy/Environmental Consultant Maria Papadakis James Madison University Polly N. Shaw Consultant Susan E. Stratton Energy Center of Wisconsin James J. Winebrake, Ph.D. Rochester Institute of Technology David B. Zabetakis David B. Zabetakis, LLC November 4, 2005 Mr. Rick Khan, Program Manager Federal Energy Management Program U.S. Department of Energy

90

ORISE: Scientific Peer Review Planning  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Planning Planning Woman participating in a peer review The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) begins the peer review planning process by analyzing the purpose of the funds to be distributed. Because each agency's needs are different, ORISE then designs and manages a flexible, scientific peer review process that can be modified based on a sponsor's regulatory, policy and operational requirements. ORISE's existing tools and systems, and knowledge of reviewing proposals from a government agency perspective, are helping to promote the quality and credibility of scientific information and funded research. ORISE's peer review planning process ensures each objective review is completed on schedule, within budget and with a high degree of process integrity.

91

Published Peer Reviews | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Published Peer Reviews Published Peer Reviews Published Peer Reviews Peer Review Agenda Vehicle Technologies Annual Merit Review Effects of Intermediate Ethanol Blends on Legacy Vehicles and Small Non-Road Engines, Report 1 (pdf) Peer Review Plan for influential scientific assessment entitled, "Effects of Intermediate Ethanol Blends on Legacy Vehicles and Small Non-Road Engines, Report 1." (pdf) Peer Review Plan for Highly Influential Scientific Assessment entitled, "Climate Models: An Assessment of Strengths and Limitations for User Applications" (pdf) Peer Review Plan for Highly Influential Scientific Assessment entitled, "Synthesis and Assessment Report on Scenarios of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations and Review of Integrated Scenario

92

2014 AMO Peer Review Agenda | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

2014 AMO Peer Review Agenda 2014 AMO Peer Review Agenda View the agenda for the AMO peer review held May 6-7, 2014. View the peer review presentations. 2014 AMO Peer Review Agenda...

93

Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Rulemaking Rulemaking Peer Review Report - Supporting Documentation Submitted Pursuant to the Office of Management and Budget's "Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" U.S. Department of Energy March 2007 Table of Contents PROJECT ABSTRACTS ................................................................................................... 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS ............................................................................................ 16 SLIDE PRESENTATIONS ON JUNE 28 & 29, 2005 .................................................. 104 PEER REVIEWER EVALUATION FORM.................................................................. 201 PEER REVIEW AGENDA JUNE 28 & 29, 2005 .........................................................

94

Evergreening Peer Review Business Process Modeling (BPM)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Evergreening Peer Review Business Process Modeling (BPM) On behalf of the Peer Review Subject of the BPM process undertaken to model the current business process of peer review from the perspective. Sheryl K. Brining, Ph.D. Michael Rennolds Paul Sheehy, Ph.D. #12;Peer Review BPM White Paper-Dec1_FINAL

Rau, Don C.

95

Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Supporting documentation for the peer review of the appliance energy efficiency standards rulemaking process.

96

Peer Review Summary Document (April 23, 2008)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary Document (April 23, 2008) Peer Review Plan Southeast Extension of the Southern. Kelsy, Elizabeth Barnett, Lee Liberty, Karen L. Meagher, and Kristen Pape. Peer Reviewers Expertise and Credentials The scientific expertise of the two peer reviewers the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) selected

Torgersen, Christian

97

Peer Review Summary Document (July 31, 2008)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary Document (July 31, 2008) Peer Review Plan Synthesis and Assessment Product 1.2: Past Climate Variability and Change in the Arctic and at High Latitudes [14 KB PDF]. Peer Reviewers' Information Names and biographies of peer reviewers [118 KB PDF] for Synthesis and Assessment Product (SAP) 1

Torgersen, Christian

98

12: How to peer review a manuscript  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

12: How to peer review a manuscript DAVID MOHER, ALEJANDRO R JADAD Peer review is an activity or standardised training for peer reviewers exists. In this chapter we provide a series of practical tips on how to peer review a manuscript and write the report based on the evidence from published research

Hall, Spencer

99

Member Organisation Forum European Peer Review Guide  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Member Organisation Forum European Peer Review Guide Integrating Policies and Practices-2-918428-34-3 Printing: Ireg ­ Strasbourg #12;Contents Foreword 3 Part I: Overview of the Peer Review System 5 Chapter 1 instruments 10 Chapter 3: Pillars of good practice in peer review 12 3.1 Core principles of peer review 12 3

Economou, Tassos

100

EnergyPlus- 2013 Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Emerging Technologies Project about building energy modeling for the 2013 Building Technologies Office's Program Peer Review.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

PAE Evaluation Portfolio Peer Review  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

This is a report from the Peer Review Panel on activities within the Planning, Analysis and Evaluation Unit of the Office of Planning, Budget and Analysis, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy.

102

2011 Peer Review Report | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Geothermal Technology Program Peer Review Report Tracer Methods for Characterizing Fracture Creation in Enhanced Geothermal Systems; 2010 Geothermal Technology Program Peer...

103

2014 Wind Program Peer Review Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Wind Program Peer Review Meeting was held March 24-28, 2014 in Arlington, VA. Principle investigators from the Energy Department, National Laboratories, academic, and industry representatives presented the progress of their DOE-funded research. This report documents the formal, rigorous evaluation process and findings of nine independent reviewers who examined the technical, scientific, and business results of Wind Program funded projects, as well as the productivity and management effectiveness of the Wind Program itself.

104

2000 TAPPI JOURNAL PEER REVIEWED PAPER DECEMBER 20001 2000 TAPPI JOURNAL PEER REVIEWED PAPER  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

2000 TAPPI JOURNAL PEER REVIEWED PAPER DECEMBER 20001 2000 TAPPI JOURNAL PEER REVIEWED PAPER, United Kingdom #12;2000 TAPPI JOURNAL PEER REVIEWED PAPER DECEMBER 20002 ideal sheets of randomly

Dodson, C.T.J.

105

Peer Review Summary Document (09/17/2012)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary Document (09/17/2012) Peer Review Plan http://www.usgs.gov/peer_review. David Wiens. Peer Reviewers Expertise and Credentials Peer Reviewer #1: Professor, Oregon State University Peer Reviewer #2: Research Wildlife Biologist, U.S. Forest Service Peer Reviewer #3: Professor

Torgersen, Christian

106

April 30, 2009 ENHANCING PEER REVIEW  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

April 30, 2009 ENHANCING PEER REVIEW: Overview of Implementation for Reviewers Background Goals of Peer Review Enhancements Recognize changing nature of research; identify and encourage new and early Peer Review Web site At the Review Meeting Preliminary impact/priority scores will help determine

Bandettini, Peter A.

107

Peer Review of NIH Research Grant  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Page 1 Peer Review of NIH Research Grant Applications Anthony M. Coelho, Jr., Ph.D. Review Policy Officer Office of the Director NIH Office of Extramural Research Peer Review of NIH Research Grant - Clinical Studies and Training 7 years Section NIHBI and Scientific Review Administrator ·Peer Reviewer 12

108

Water Power Program: 2011 Peer Review Report | Department of...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Water Power Program: 2011 Peer Review Report Water Power Program: 2011 Peer Review Report This document contains the peer review panel's observations and findings, responses from...

109

Water Power Program: 2010 Peer Review Report | Department of...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Water Power Program: 2010 Peer Review Report Water Power Program: 2010 Peer Review Report This document contains the peer review panel's observations and findings, responses from...

110

Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review Final Information Quality...

111

Peer Review: Consensus and Contradiction, a Qualitative Approach  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts. J ClinThe shortcomings of peer review. Learned Publishing 14:i) Title: Peer Review: Consensus and Contradiction, a

Tercier, John; Callaham, Michael L.

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

112

OpenStudio - 2013 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

OpenStudio - 2013 Peer Review OpenStudio - 2013 Peer Review Emerging Technologies Project for the 2013 Building Technologies Office's Program Peer Review emrgtech02brackney040213...

113

Program Peer Review New Directions | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Peer Review New Directions Program Peer Review New Directions BETO Program Peer Review - New Directions, 2013 programmanagementreview2013directionsreed.pdf More Documents &...

114

ORISE: Scientific Peer Review for State and Federal Agencies  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Scientific Peer Review Capabilities Overview Peer review planning Expert identification Peer review management Workshop coordination Process improvement How ORISE is making a...

115

2013 Peer Review Opening Plenary Presentation | Department of...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

2013 Peer Review Opening Plenary Presentation 2013 Peer Review Opening Plenary Presentation Opening plenary presentation at the 2013 annual peer review meeting in Colorado....

116

Peer Reviews | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Peer Reviews Peer Reviews Peer Reviews SMART GRID PROGRAM 2012 Agenda and Presentations, San Diego, CA, June 7-8, 2012 2010 Agenda and Presentations, Denver, CO, November 2-4, 2010 2008 Renewable and Distributed Systems Integration Agenda, Red Bank, NJ, October 29-30, 2008 TRANSMISSION RELIABILITY 2013 Reliability & Markets Agenda and Presentations, Ithaca, NY, August 6-7, 2013 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Agenda and Presentations, Washington, DC, June 27-28, 2013 2012 Load as a Resource Agenda and Presentations, Washington, DC, September 20, 2012 2012 Reliability & Markets Agenda and Presentations, Ithaca, NY, August 7-8, 2012 2012 Advanced Applications Agenda and Presentations, Washington, DC, June 12-13, 2012 2010 Agenda and Presentations, and Final Report, Alexandria, VA,

117

ENHANCING PEER REVIEW -UPDATE November 2008  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ENHANCING PEER REVIEW - UPDATE November 2008 Preparing for Changes in Peer Review The first stages of implementation of changes in NIH peer review will begin in January and February 2009. These changes will be timed to apply to all three standard review/award cycles in each fiscal year. Please see the chart below showing

Bandettini, Peter A.

118

Peer Review of the ASCEM Program 2010  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

emdoe.gov emdoe.gov Advanced Simulation Capability for Environmental Management (ASCEM) Independent Peer Review and Assessment Team Report Technology Innovation and Development Office of Environmental Management U.S. Department of Energy September 15, 2010 Table of Contents Transmission Memorandum . . . . . . . . 1 ASCEM IPRA Team . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Findings and Observations . . . . . . . . . 5 Appendices 1: Agenda . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2: Biographical Information . . . . . 8 3: ASCEM IPRA CHARTER . . . . . 10 4: Conflict of Interest Form . . . . . 16 i Intentional Blank Page

119

Building Technologies Office Overview- 2014 Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presenter: Roland Risser, U.S. Department of Energy This presentation at the 2014 Peer Review provided an overview of the Building Technologies Office. Through robust feedback, the BTO Program Peer Review enhances existing efforts and improves future designs.

120

2014 Advanced Grid Modeling Program Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a peer review of the Advanced Grid Modeling Program on June 17-18, 2014 in Alexandria, VA. This page lists the four sessions of the Peer Review.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Wind Program Peer Reviews | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Peer Reviews Wind Program Peer Reviews All programs within the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) are required to undertake...

122

Peer Review Summary Document (10/24/2013)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary Document (10/24/2013) Peer Review Plan http://www.usgs.gov/peer_review, and Marshall W. Gannett. Peer Reviewers Expertise and Credentials Peer Reviewer #1: A U.S. Geological Survey to groundwater studies. Peer Reviewer #2: A USGS Hydrologist for 23 years. The reviewer has a PhD from

Torgersen, Christian

123

Peer Review Summary Document (12/4/2013)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary Document (12/4/2013) Peer Review Plan http://www.usgs.gov/peer_review, and Charles Schwartz. Peer Reviewers Expertise and Credentials Peer Reviewer #1: USGS Research Ecologist. Reviewer #1 specializes in carnivore ecology, population dynamics, and habitat modeling. Peer Reviewer #2

Torgersen, Christian

124

Classroom Evaluation of a Scaffolding Intervention for Improving Peer Review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Classroom Evaluation of a Scaffolding Intervention for Improving Peer Review Localization Huy, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 Abstract. A peer review system that automatically evaluates student feedback comments first drafts were both reviewed by peers. During peer review, the system automatically analyzed

Litman, Diane J.

125

Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

DOE prepared this report in response to the Office of Management and Budget's "Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review."

126

Peer Review As part of the overall evaluation process for faculty members, standing peer review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review As part of the overall evaluation process for faculty members, standing peer review, scholarship, and service. Peer review committees may be established at the discipline and/or at the division level (interdisciplinary). Peer review committees will consist of at least five tenured faculty members

Gering, Jon C.

127

2014 Reliability & Markets Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 15 presentations over 2 days on August 5 - 6, 2014 at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY. Presentations are available through the links. The agenda and list of presentations are available to download.

128

Mn/DOT's Project Peer Review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Mn/DOT's Project Management Peer Review Creating a Project Management Culture 2010 CTS Research and perspectives ·Peer Review Process and Results ·Construction Industry Perspective ·Next Steps ·Q & A #12;Why a Peer Review? Why Project Management? ·Improve project delivery performance ­ on time, on budget (an

Minnesota, University of

129

Brookhaven National Laboratory presentation 2007 Peer Review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Brookhaven National Laboratory presentation 2007 Peer Review August 7- 9, 2007, Arlington, VA Slide Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973 DOE Peer Review, Arlington VA, August 7-9 2007 #12;Brookhaven National Laboratory presentation 2007 Peer Review August 7- 9, 2007, Arlington, VA Slide 2 2 Outline Program objective

Homes, Christopher C.

130

Peer Review Anew: Three Principles and a  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

INVITED P A P E R Peer Review Anew: Three Principles and a Case Study in Postpublication Quality arisen, especially concerning quality assurance, peer review, reuse, and modification. New innovations are appearing in peer review, endorsement, the measurement of trust, and the understanding of reputation

131

STUDENTBMJ | VOLUME 15 | MARCH 2007 Peer review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

STUDENTBMJ | VOLUME 15 | MARCH 2007 education Peer review: it's not personal T he romance of the next part of the process--peer review (see figure). A common scenario This time it wasn't just a piece of worries in the "out of sight and out of mind" league an innocuous email arrived. Peer review is central

Haylett, Kevin R.

132

MANUSCRIPT PEER REVIEW: A HELPFUL CHECKLIST FOR  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

MANUSCRIPT PEER REVIEW: A HELPFUL CHECKLIST FOR STUDENTS AND NOVICE REFEREES Douglas R. Seals is an essential element of the scientific peer review process and an important professional skill is an essential element of the peer review process and, therefore, is an important professional skill

Blouin-Demers, Gabriel

133

Enhancing Peer Review Survey Results Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Enhancing Peer Review Survey Results Report Published May 2013 #12;1 | E n h a n c i n g P e e r R Review surveys, conducted in spring 2012, elicited opinions about the NIH peer surveys were conducted, focusing on areas that represent core peer review

Bandettini, Peter A.

134

TEACHING PEER REVIEW AND THE PROCESS OF  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

TEACHING PEER REVIEW AND THE PROCESS OF SCIENTIFIC WRITING William H. Guilford Department and graduate students understand neither the process of scientific writing nor the significance of peer review publishing process. However, none fully reproduced peer review and revision of papers together

Guilford, William

135

Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Program Publications Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports These reports summarize the comments of expert peer...

136

Peer Review Summary Document (7/30/2012)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary Document (7/30/2012) Peer Review Plan http://www.usgs.gov/peer_review, By Timothy M. Kresse. Peer Review Expertise and Credentials Peer Reviewer #1: Hydrologist earned of unconventional oil and gas development at the John Wesley Powell Center for Analysis and Synthesis. Peer Reviewer

Torgersen, Christian

137

Peer Review Summary Document (05/20/2013)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary Document (05/20/2013) Peer Review Plan http://www.usgs.gov/peer_review.F. Koltun. Peer Reviewers Expertise and Credentials Peer Reviewer #1 ­ Ph.D. in civil engineering from-quality, contaminant tracking, and hydroacoustics. Peer Reviewer #2 ­ M.S .in geology from Michigan State University, B

Torgersen, Christian

138

Peer Review Summary Document (08/23/2012)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary Document (08/23/2012) Peer Review Plan http://www.usgs.gov/peer_review. Peer Reviewers' Expertise and Credentials Peer Reviewer #1: Research Hydrologist in the U.S. Geological in Oregon and California which encompasses the area of the subject report. Peer Reviewer #2: Hydrologist

Torgersen, Christian

139

PAE Evaluation Portfolio Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Report from the Peer Review Panel Report from the Peer Review Panel on activities within the Planning, Analysis and Evaluation Unit Office of Planning, Budget and Analysis Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy Team Members: Kathryn Newcomer, The George Washington University (Chair) Irwin Feller, The Pennsylvania State University (Retired) Stephanie Shipman, Government Accountability Office Kathleen Sedlak O'Brien, Environmental Protection Agency Faith Lambert, EERE Final Report February 1, 2008 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) within the U.S. Department of Energy asked a panel of experts with relevant knowledge to review the evaluation activities of the Planning, Analysis and Evaluation Unit (PAE) within EERE's Office of Planning, Budget and

140

Investigation Peer Review 2008 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

08 Investigation Peer Review 2008 September 15, 2008 Subject: Report on the Quality Assessment Review of the Investigative Operations of the Office of Inspector General for the...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

2014 Wind Program Peer Review Report Cover | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

2014 Wind Program Peer Review Report Cover 2014 Wind Program Peer Review Report Cover 2014 Wind Program Peer Review Report.JPG More Documents & Publications 2014 Water Power Peer...

142

Peer Review Summary Document (05/29/2013)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary Document (05/29/2013) Peer Review Plan http://www.usgs.gov/peer_review, Ted Sommer, Kelly Souza, and Erwin Van Nieuwenhuyse. Peer Reviewers Expertise and Credentials Review was by a 6-member Panel (Reviewers 1-6 below) and one additional reviewer (Reviewer #7 below). · Peer

Torgersen, Christian

143

In-Flow Peer-Review of Tests in Test-First Programming Joe Gibbs Politz  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

In-Flow Peer-Review of Tests in Test-First Programming Joe Gibbs Politz Brown University joe-first development and peer review have been studied independently in computing courses, but their combination has not. We report on an experiment in which students in two courses conducted peer review of test suites

Krishnamurthi, Shriram

144

Peer Review Summary Document (11/9/2012)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary Document (11/9/2012) Peer Review Plan http:// www.usgs.gov/peer_review. Mahler, and Peter C. Van Metre. Peer Reviewers Expertise and Credentials Reviewer #1: Holds exposures. The reviewer has published 15 articles in the peer-reviewed literature, as cited by Scopus

Torgersen, Christian

145

EERE Peer Review Guide - August 2004  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PEER REVIEW GUIDE PEER REVIEW GUIDE Based on a Survey of Best Practices for In-Progress Peer Review Prepared by the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Peer Review Task Force August 2004 EERE PEER REVIEW GUIDE Acknowledgements DOE/EERE, and the Peer Review Task Force particularly, acknowledge the generous and important contributions to this Guide of Review Panel Chairman Ronald N. Kostoff, Office of Naval Research, and expert panel members and reviewers: Greg Stover, NASA; Paul Doremus, NIST; Richard Silberglitt, Rand; Kerry L. Dearfield, EPA; Jim Cassatt, NIH; Daryl Chubin, NACME; Fiona Wood, Australia; Frans van den Beemt, Netherlands; Larry James, DOE; and David Tratt, NASA. Notice This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States

146

Peer Review Committees 2008 REVIEWEES COMMITTEES  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Committees 2008 REVIEWEES COMMITTEES Instructors/Lecturers Opoku-Edusei Lanford Parent Associate Professors - to be announced - We will hold our peer review meeting during the week of May 5th things along this year, each reviewee's CV, FAR report, scantron teaching reviews and last year's review

147

Peer Review Summary 8/13/2014 (Updated)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary 8/13/2014 (Updated) Peer Review Plan http://www.usgs.gov/peer_review, Kenneth E. Mayer, and Amarina Wuenschel. Peer Reviewers Expertise and Credentials Reviewer #1 has a Ph, and has over 17 peer reviewed publications in terrestrial systems monitoring, vegetation and habitat

148

Peer Review Summary Document (1/13/2011)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary Document (1/13/2011) Peer Review Plan Regional Groundwater-Flow Model, James B. Callegary, and Leslie F. Graser. Peer Reviewers Expertise and Credentials Peer Reviewer #1 ­ Ph possesses expertise in riparian hydrogeology. Peer Reviewer #2 ­ M.S. in engineering geology. Reviewer #2

Torgersen, Christian

149

Peer Review Summary Document (2/18/2014)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary Document (2/18/2014) http://www.usgs.gov/peer_review and T.L. Nichols. Peer Reviewers Expertise and Credentials Peer Reviewer #1: USGS research Reviewer #2: Senior USGS research geologist with expertise in carbonate environments. Peer Reviewer #3

Torgersen, Christian

150

Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 14, 2010 FY10-42 OAK RIDGE, Tenn.-Oak Ridge Associated Universities has appointed Tony Lester as director of the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education's program focused on scientific peer review. Lester has been serving in this role in an acting capacity since September 2009. Tony Lester Tony Lester In his role, Lester manages a research peer review capability that coordinates the use of independent, expert reviewers to determine the scientific technical feasibility of proposals submitted in response to government agency research needs. His team works closely with the federal government to provide liaison, consultation and operations support during the planning and execution of customers' grant management cycles. The

151

Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

submission Thorough peer review No space constraints or2012 Published: 28 August 2012 References 1. Peer review.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review. 2. Callaham ML, Tercier

Houry, Debra; Green, Steven; Callaham, Michael

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

152

Peer Review of Standards Rulemaking | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Peer Review of Standards Rulemaking Peer Review of Standards Rulemaking The Department of Energy assembled a panel of experts to review the analysis used in the appliance energy...

153

2013 Peer Review Meeting Plenary Overview Presentation | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Meeting Plenary Overview Presentation 2013 Peer Review Meeting Plenary Overview Presentation Plenary overview presentation by Kate Baker, Review Chair, at the 2013 peer review...

154

Sealed source peer review plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Sealed sources are known quantities of radioactive materials that have been encapsulated in quantities that produce known radiation fields. Sealed sources have multiple uses ranging from instrument calibration sources to sources that produce radiation fields for experimental applications. The Off-Site Source Recovery (OSR) Project at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), created in 1999, under the direction of the Waste Management Division of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Albuquerque has been assigned the responsibility to recover and manage excess and unwanted radioactive sealed sources from the public and private sector. LANL intends to ship drums containing qualified sealed sources to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) for disposal. Prior to shipping, these drums must be characterized with respect to radiological content and other parameters. The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires that ten radionulcides be quantified and reported for every container of waste to be disposed in the WIPP. The methods traditionally approved by the EPA include non-destructive assay (NDA) in accordance with Appendix A of the Contact-Handled Transuranic Waste Acceptance Criteria for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (DOE, 2002) (CH WAC). However, because of the nature and pedigree of historical records for sealed sources and the technical infeasibility of performing NDA on these sources, LANL proposes to characterize the content of these waste drums using qualified existing radiological data in lieu of direct measurement. This plan describes the process and documentation requirements for the use of the peer review process to qualify existing data for sealed radiological sources in lieu of perfonning radioassay. The peer review process will be performed in accordance with criteria provided in 40 CFR {section} 194.22 which specifies the use of the NUREG 1297 guidelines. The plan defines the management approach, resources, schedule, and technical requirements for the subject peer review.

Feldman, Alexander [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Leonard, Lee [RETIRED; Burns, Ron [CONTRACTOR

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

155

Peer Review Hit Hard By Shutdown  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Peer Review Hit Hard By Shutdown ... The peer review system at many federal science funding agencies is gradually working its way out of chaos after the conclusion of a 16-day government shutdown. ... Hundreds of grant review panels were canceled at NSF and NIH alone. ...

ANDREA WIDENER

2013-10-28T23:59:59.000Z

156

Peer Review Committees 2010 REVIEWEES COMMITTEES  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Committees 2010 REVIEWEES COMMITTEES Instructors/Lecturers Opoku-Edusei Lanford Parent will hold our peer review meeting on April 30. Therefore, I ask that signed committee reports on each reviewee be submitted no later than April 26nd. Each reviewee's CV, FAR report, scantron teaching reviews

157

2014 Energy Storage Peer Review- Preliminary Agenda  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The 2014 Energy Storage Peer Review will be held September 19-19, 2014, in Washington, DC. The preliminary agenda is available for downloading.

158

2014 Water Power Peer Review Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Water Power Peer Review Meeting was held February 24-28, 2014 in Arlington, VA. Principle investigators from the Energy Department National Laboratories, academic, and industry representatives...

159

Peer Reviewed: Experimenting with Hydroelectric Reservoirs  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Peer Reviewed: Experimenting with Hydroelectric Reservoirs ... Researchers created reservoirs in Canada to explore the impacts of hydroelectric developments on greenhouse gas and methylmercury production. ...

R. A. Bodaly; Kenneth G. Beaty; Len H. Hendzel; Andrew R. Majewski; Michael J. Paterson; Kristofer R. Rolfhus; Alan F. Penn; Vincent L. St. Louis; Britt D. Hall; Cory J. D. Matthews; Katharine A. Cherewyk; Mariah Mailman; James P. Hurley; Sherry L. Schiff; Jason J. Venkiteswaran

2004-09-15T23:59:59.000Z

160

Peer Review in the Contemporary Corporation.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??My dissertation explores the history, pedagogy, and practice of peer review in academia and in the workplace, so that I could suggest strategies for improving (more)

Wisdom, Shannon Warren

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

ORISE: Capabilities in Scientific Peer Review  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Related Link Best Practices in Peer Review Assure Quality, Value, Objectivity (PDF, 330KB) Journal of the National Grants Management Association Oak Ridge Institute for Science...

162

Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report ...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

response to the Office of Management and Budget's "Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review." peerreviewreport021507.pdf More Documents & Publications Energy...

163

Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report ...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Supporting documentation for the peer review of the appliance energy efficiency standards rulemaking process. peerreviewdocumentation.pdf More Documents & Publications Report to...

164

Peer Review Summary Document (10/29/2013)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary Document (10/29/2013) Peer Review Plan http://www.usgs.gov/peer_review.S. Geological Survey) and Douglas Carter (University of Florida, Gainesville). Peer Reviewers Expertise and Credentials Peer Reviewer #1 ­ Ph.D. in Environmental Science and Management. Expertise in environmental

Torgersen, Christian

165

Peer Review Summary Document (3/14/2012)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary Document (3/14/2012) Peer Review Plan http://www.usgs.gov/peer_review Wada (University of Hawai`i Economic Research Organization). Note: A Peer Review Summary Document for the previous publication of this product is found at http://www.usgs.gov/peer_review

Torgersen, Christian

166

Internal Peer Review Program -Faculty of Medicine May 2013 INTERNAL PEER REVIEW PROGRAM  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Applicants may choose a Medical Research Development Office Internal Peer Review (MRDO- IPR) or a Self-Directed Internal Peer Review (SD-IPR.) 1. MRDO-Internal Peer Review (MRDO-IPR) At least two months prior to the agency's deadline, applicants using MRDO-IPR will provide the following information. This will allow MRDO

Brownstone, Rob

167

2014 Water Power Peer Review Report Cover | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

2014 Water Power Peer Review Report Cover 2014 Water Power Peer Review Report Cover 2014 Water Power Peer Review Report Cover.JPG More Documents & Publications NOWEGIS Report Cover...

168

Accepted Peer Reviewed Presentations Authors Affiliation Podium & Symposium  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Accepted Peer Reviewed Presentations Authors Affiliation Podium & Symposium Presentations Atav and Deficits #12;Accepted Peer Reviewed Presentations Authors Affiliation Podium & Symposium Presentations-up to a Quantitative Study on Cessation in a Rural Population #12;Accepted Peer Reviewed Presentations Authors

Suzuki, Masatsugu

169

Peer Review of Manuscripts Submitted Via the Academy Fellowship Track  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...author and source are credited. Peer Review of Manuscripts Submitted Via...Casadevall A, Collier RJ. 2011. Peer review of manuscripts submitted via...have been scrutinized by several peers, generating reviews in addition to the those submitted...

Arturo Casadevall; R. John Collier

2011-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

170

EERE Peer Review Guide - August 2004 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

EERE Peer Review Guide - August 2004 EERE Peer Review Guide - August 2004 Guidance based on a survey of best practices for in-progress peer review 2004peerreviewguide.pdf More...

171

TRIBAL ENERGY PROGRAM PEER REVIEW REPORT | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

TRIBAL ENERGY PROGRAM PEER REVIEW REPORT TRIBAL ENERGY PROGRAM PEER REVIEW REPORT On February 28-March 1, 2006, the Tribal Energy Program Peer Review was held in Golden, CO. The...

172

Peer Review of Datasets: When, Why, and How  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Peer review holds a central place within the scientific communication system. Traditionally, research quality has been assessed by peer review of journal articles, conference proceedings, and books. There is strong support for the peer review process ...

Matthew S. Mayernik; Sarah Callaghan; Roland Leigh; Jonathan Tedds; Steven Worley

173

Peer Review of the ASCEM Program 2010 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Peer Review of the ASCEM Program 2010 Peer Review of the ASCEM Program 2010 Full Document and Summary Versions are available for download Peer Review of the ASCEM Program 2010...

174

Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Conservation Standards Rulemaking Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report Prepared Pursuant to the Office of Management and Budget's "Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" U.S. Department of Energy February 2007 Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................... 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 4 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 6 2. PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE ...................................................................................... 6 3. SCOPE ........................................................................................................................... 7

175

Building America Overview- 2014 BTO Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presenter: Eric Werling, U.S. Department of Energy This presentation at the 2014 Peer Review provided an overview of the Building Technologies Office's Building America activities. Through robust feedback, the BTO Program Peer Review enhances existing efforts and improves future designs.

176

Transactive Controls Overview- 2014 BTO Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presenter: Joseph Hagerman, U.S. Department of Energy This presentation at the 2014 Peer Review provided an overview of the Building Technologies Office's Transactive Controls activities. Through robust feedback, the BTO Program Peer Review enhances existing efforts and improves future designs.

177

Investigation Peer Review 2012 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

12 Investigation Peer Review 2012 May 9, 2012 Subject: Report on the Quality Assessment Review of the Investigative Outcomes of the Office of Inspector General for the U.S....

178

Absorption Heat Pump Water Heater - 2013 Peer Review | Department...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Absorption Heat Pump Water Heater - 2013 Peer Review Absorption Heat Pump Water Heater - 2013 Peer Review Emerging Technologies Project for the 2013 Building Technologies Office's...

179

2011 Biomass Program Peer Review Report | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

2011 Biomass Program Peer Review Report 2011 Biomass Program Peer Review Report This document summarizes the recommendations and evaluations resulting from the U.S. Department of...

180

2014 Advanced Grid Modeling Peer Review Presentations - Day One...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Morning Session 2014 Advanced Grid Modeling Peer Review Presentations - Day One Morning Session The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a peer review of the...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Emerging Technologies Program Overview - 2013 BTO Peer Review...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Emerging Technologies Program Overview - 2013 BTO Peer Review Emerging Technologies Program Overview - 2013 BTO Peer Review An overview of BTO's Emerging Technologies program as...

182

Energy Design Assistance Project Tracker - 2014 BTO Peer Review...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Design Assistance Project Tracker - 2014 BTO Peer Review Energy Design Assistance Project Tracker - 2014 BTO Peer Review Presenter: Larry Brackney, National Renewable Energy...

183

Building Energy Codes Program - 2014 BTO Peer Review | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

- 2014 BTO Peer Review Building Energy Codes Program - 2014 BTO Peer Review Presenter: Bing Liu, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory View the Presentation Building Energy Codes...

184

Better Buildings Workforce Overview - 2014 BTO Peer Review |...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Workforce Overview - 2014 BTO Peer Review Better Buildings Workforce Overview - 2014 BTO Peer Review Presenter: Benjamin Goldstein, U.S. Department of Energy This presentation at...

185

Building America Team (CARB) - 2014 BTO Peer Review | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CARB) - 2014 BTO Peer Review Building America Team (CARB) - 2014 BTO Peer Review Presenter: Dianne Griffiths, Steven Winter Associates, Inc. Building America research projects...

186

Better Buildings Residential Program - 2014 BTO Peer Review ...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Residential Program - 2014 BTO Peer Review Better Buildings Residential Program - 2014 BTO Peer Review Presenter: Danielle Byrnett, U.S. Department of Energy The Better Buildings...

187

2014 Advanced Grid Modeling Program Peer Review Presentations...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Advanced Grid Modeling Program Peer Review Presentations Now Available 2014 Advanced Grid Modeling Program Peer Review Presentations Now Available July 10, 2014 - 6:01pm Addthis...

188

Accelerated Aging of Roofing Materials - 2013 BTO Peer Review...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Accelerated Aging of Roofing Materials - 2013 BTO Peer Review Accelerated Aging of Roofing Materials - 2013 BTO Peer Review Emerging Technologies Project for the 2013 Building...

189

Transforming Commercial Building Operations - 2013 BTO Peer Review...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Transforming Commercial Building Operations - 2013 BTO Peer Review Transforming Commercial Building Operations - 2013 BTO Peer Review Commercial Buildings Integration Project for...

190

Building America Team (NAHBRC) - 2014 BTO Peer Review | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

NAHBRC) - 2014 BTO Peer Review Building America Team (NAHBRC) - 2014 BTO Peer Review Presenter: Vladimir Kochkin, Home Innovation Research Labs Building America research projects...

191

Transmission Reliability "Load as a Resource" Peer Review Materials...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Transmission Reliability "Load as a Resource" Peer Review Materials Now Available Transmission Reliability "Load as a Resource" Peer Review Materials Now Available September 25,...

192

Building America Team (IBACOS) - 2014 BTO Peer Review | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

IBACOS) - 2014 BTO Peer Review Building America Team (IBACOS) - 2014 BTO Peer Review Presenter: Duncan Prahl, IBACOS, Inc. Building America research projects develop and...

193

Emerging Technologies Program Overview - 2014 BTO Peer Review...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technologies Program Overview - 2014 BTO Peer Review Emerging Technologies Program Overview - 2014 BTO Peer Review Presenter: Pat Phelan, U.S. Department of Energy This...

194

Open Energy Information Systems - 2013 Peer Review | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Open Energy Information Systems - 2013 Peer Review Open Energy Information Systems - 2013 Peer Review Emerging Technologies Project for the 2013 Building Technologies Office's...

195

Technology Performance Exchange - 2014 BTO Peer Review | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Technology Performance Exchange - 2014 BTO Peer Review Technology Performance Exchange - 2014 BTO Peer Review Project Objective This project's overall goal is to ensure that...

196

Prioritization Tool - 2013 BTO Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Prioritization Tool - 2013 BTO Peer Review Prioritization Tool - 2013 BTO Peer Review Building Technologies Office Prioritization Tool Presentation for the 2013 Building...

197

Building Energy Modeling Library - 2013 BTO Peer Review | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Energy Modeling Library - 2013 BTO Peer Review Building Energy Modeling Library - 2013 BTO Peer Review Commercial Buildings Integration Project for the 2013 Building Technologies...

198

What's with all this peer-review stuff anyway?  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Journal of Physical Security was ostensibly started to deal with a perceived lack of peer-reviewed journals related to the field of physical security. In fact, concerns have been expressed that the field of physical security is scarcely a field at all. A typical, well-developed field might include the following: multiple peer-reviewed journals devoted to the subject, rigor and critical thinking, metrics, fundamental principles, models and theories, effective standards and guidelines, R and D conferences, professional societies, certifications, its own academic department (or at least numerous academic experts), widespread granting of degrees in the field from 4-year research universities, mechanisms for easily spotting 'snake oil' products and services, and the practice of professionals organizing to police themselves, provide quality control, and determine best practices. Physical Security seems to come up short in a number of these areas. Many of these attributes are difficult to quantify. This paper seeks to focus on one area that is quantifiable: the number of peer-reviewed journals dedicated to the field of Physical Security. In addition, I want to examine the number of overall periodicals (peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed) dedicated to physical security, as well as the number of papers published each year about physical security. These are potentially useful analyses because one can often infer how healthy or active a given field is by its publishing activity. For example, there are 2,754 periodicals dedicated to the (very healthy and active) field of physics. This paper concentrates on trade journal versus peer-reviewed journals. Trade journals typically focus on practice-related topics. A paper appropriate for a trade journal is usually based more on practical experience than rigorous studies or research. Models, theories, or rigorous experimental research results will usually not be included. A trade journal typically targets a specific market in an industry or trade. Such journals are often considered to be news magazines and may contain industry specific advertisements and/or job ads. A peer-reviewed journal, a.k.a 'referred journal', in contrast, contains peer-reviewed papers. A peer-reviewed paper is one that has been vetted by the peer review process. In this process, the paper is typically sent to independent experts for review and consideration. A peer-reviewed paper might cover experimental results, and/or a rigorous study, analyses, research efforts, theory, models, or one of many other scholarly endeavors.

Warner, J. S. (Nuclear Engineering Division)

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

199

Microsoft Word - PeerReview_SAR.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

a Peer Review of a "Synthesis and Assessment Report on a Peer Review of a "Synthesis and Assessment Report on Scenarios of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations and Review of Integrated Scenario Development and Application" Pursuant to Section V of the "Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), under the authority of the Information Quality Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-554), the U.S. Climate Change Science Program (CCSP) announces a plan for a peer review of its Synthesis and Assessment Report 2.1 entitled "Scenarios of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations and Review of Integrated Scenario Development and Application" The CCSP (see http://www.climatescience.gov for details) integrates federal

200

Peer Review Plan Date: 3/14/2012  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Plan Date: 3/14/2012 Source Center: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Forest and Rangeland of a graduate committee review and a separate USGS peer review. USGS will select the peer reviewers pursuant to requirements in Survey Manual chapter 502.3--Fundamental Science Practices: Peer Review (http

Torgersen, Christian

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Secretary of Natural Resources Laird Praises Independent Science Review of Bay Delta Plan  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Secretary of Natural Resources Laird Praises Independent Science Review of Bay Delta Plan, independent scientists peer review the adequacy of the many vital science components of this plan and publicly will have with stakeholders. Also, this independent, peer review helps create a more dynamic, sound plan

202

PWR GASIFIER PEER REVIEW FINAL REPORT  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

PWR GASIFIER PEER REVIEW REPORT PWR GASIFIER PEER REVIEW REPORT 2/21/06 Background Pratt and Whitney Rocketdyne (PWR) signed a cooperative agreement with DOE on 9/30/04 to develop a novel gasifier concept, which is expected to improve the availability and efficiency of gasification-based power plants, and to reduce plant capital and operations costs. On 12/21/05, PWR submitted a proposal to continue development of their gasifier into the next phase. On January 24, 2006, a peer review was performed to review the work that PWR has done to date, their technical approach for future development, and to assess the potential benefit of the PWR gasifier and feed system technologies over state-of-the art coal gasification. The peer reviewers also evaluated a DOE analysis of the PWR refractory, and a DOE system study comparing the

203

Nevada National Security Site Groundwater Program Welcomes Peer Review Team  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Recently, an independent peer review team was invited to assess the groundwater characterization program at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS). This nationally recognized group of experts, from various external organizations, will examine the computer modeling approach developed to better understand how historic underground nuclear testing in Yucca Flat affected the groundwater.

204

INDEPENDENT COST REVIEW (ICR) and INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE ...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

INDEPENDENT COST REVIEW (ICR) and INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE (ICE) Standard Operating Procedures INDEPENDENT COST REVIEW (ICR) and INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE (ICE) Standard Operating...

205

Standard Energy Efficiency Database Platform- 2013 BTO Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Commercial Buildings Integration Project for the 2013 Building Technologies Office's Program Peer Review

206

Commercial Buildings Integration Program Overview- 2013 BTO Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Commercial Buildings Integration Program Presentation for the 2013 Building Technologies Office's Program Peer Review

207

Peer Review Summary Document (12/2/2011)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary Document (12/2/2011) Peer Review Plan Numerical Simulations of Groundwater Flow, by D. Matthew Ely, Matthew P. Bachmann, and John J. Vaccaro. Peer Reviewers Expertise and Credentials Peer Reviewer #1 ­ PhD in Geology from Penn State University. USGS Research Hydrologist since 1981

Torgersen, Christian

208

Peer Review Plan Date: 11/14/2011  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Plan Date: 11/14/2011 Source Center: Utah Water Science Center 2329 West Orton Circle, and Nomination Process: Peer review will be by individual letters. USGS will select the peer reviewers pursuant to requirements in Survey Manual chapter 502.3 -Fundamental Science Practices: Peer Review (http

Torgersen, Christian

209

Training in EPSRC peer review procedures, the "Mock Panel"  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Training in EPSRC peer review procedures, the "Mock Panel" Have you ever wondered who is judging your project at peer review panels, and how? Does the whole peer review system seem like a mysterious lottery? You're not alone, and it's for this reason that EPSRC conducts "Mock" Peer Review Panel meetings

Meju, Max

210

Peer Review Plan Date: 11/1/2012  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Plan Date: 11/1/2012 Source Center: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Texas Water Science in Survey Manual chapter 502.3--Fundamental Science Practices: Peer Review (http://www.usgs.gov/usgs- manual incorporated into the USGS or ES&T peer-review process. Agency Contact: peer_review_agenda@usgs.gov. #12;

Torgersen, Christian

211

Enhancing Peer Review Sally Rockey, Ph.D.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Enhancing Peer Review Sally Rockey, Ph.D. Acting Director, Office of Extramural Research (OER Programs, OER NIH Regional Seminars 2009 #12;2 Enhancing Peer Review at NIH · Cornerstone of the NIH and scientific community NIH Peer Review #12;3 Enhancing Peer Review at NIH · Facilitates changing nature

Grishok, Alla

212

Peer Review Summary Document (12/22/2010)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary Document (12/22/2010) Peer Review Plan Channel change and bed'Connor, Scott W. Anderson, Mackenzie Keith, Charles Cannon, and John Risley. Peer Reviewers Expertise and Credentials Peer Reviewer #1 ­ Phd Fluvial Geomorphologist with expertise in processes affecting steep

Torgersen, Christian

213

Peer Review Summary Document (12/2/2011)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary Document (12/2/2011) Peer Review Plan Coupled Groundwater Flow and Management, Oregon and California, By Marshall W. Gannett, Brian J. Wagner, and Kenneth E. Lite Jr. Peer Reviewers Expertise and Credentials Peer Reviewer #1: Hydrologist in the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Office

Torgersen, Christian

214

Transforming Commercial Building Operations- 2013 BTO Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Commercial Buildings Integration Project for the 2013 Building Technologies Office's Program Peer Review

215

Microsoft Word - PeerReview_CCSP.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

the Peer Review of the U.S. Climate Change Science Program the Peer Review of the U.S. Climate Change Science Program Synthesis and Assessment Report entitled 'Climate Models: An Assessment of Strengths and Limitations for User Applications' Pursuant to Section V of the "Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), under the authority of the Information Quality Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-554), the U.S. Climate Change Science Program (CCSP) announces a plan for the peer review of its Synthesis and Assessment Report entitled 'Climate Models: An Assessment of Strengths and Limitations for User Applications'. The CCSP is an interagency research, planning, and coordinating entity that integrates federal research on climate and global change, as sponsored by thirteen federal agencies and overseen by the Office of Science and Technology

216

Energy Storage Systems 2005 Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on October 20, 2005 in San Francisco, CA. The agenda and ESS program overview presentation are below.

217

2014 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included 20 presentations over 2 days on June 3 - 4, 2014 in Washington, DC. Presentations are available through the links. The agenda is available to download.

218

Water Power: 2009 Peer Review Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This document represents the 2009 Water Power Peer Review Panels observations and findings, response from the Water Program to these findings, and supporting meeting materials including an agenda and participants list.

219

Annual Peer Review Meeting | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory. On April 22-25, 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)'s Geothermal Technologies Office held its annual Peer Review Meeting at the...

220

GTP Peer Review and Pre-Peer Review Being Held This Month  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Geothermal Technologies Program (GTP) will be holding a project peer review May 18-20, 2010, in Crystal City, Virginia.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Peer Review in Academic Promotion and Publishing: Its Meaning, Locus, and Future  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Kelner. 2008. Reviewing Peer Review. Science 321 (July 4).Brown, Tracey. 2009. Peer Review Survey 2009: PreliminaryByron. 2009. Managing Peer Review Online. Presentation at

Harley, Diane; Acord, Sophia Krzys

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

222

INDEPENDENT COST REVIEW (ICR)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

COST REVIEW (ICR) COST REVIEW (ICR) and INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE (ICE) STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) Revision 1 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) OFFICE OF ACQUISITION AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT (OAPM) September 2013 SUMMARY OF UPDATES: This revision includes the following significant changes since the December 2011 SOP release: 1. The original SOP discussed how an EIR and an ICE could be executed in tandem, but since we are no longer advocating this approach the ICE process has been completely separated from the EIR process and references to EIRs have been removed. 2. Section 1 adds a reference to Public Law 2055 reflecting that we must now, as a matter of law, perform an ICE at CD-3 for projects with a TPC over $100 million. 3. Section 2 notes that DOE Programs must now pay for ICRs and ICEs and reflects that PARS II must be

223

INDEPENDENT COST REVIEW (ICR)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

COST REVIEW (ICR) COST REVIEW (ICR) and INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE (ICE) STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) Revision 1 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) OFFICE OF ACQUISITION AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT (OAPM) September 2013 SUMMARY OF UPDATES: This revision includes the following significant changes since the December 2011 SOP release: 1. The original SOP discussed how an EIR and an ICE could be executed in tandem, but since we are no longer advocating this approach the ICE process has been completely separated from the EIR process and references to EIRs have been removed. 2. Section 1 adds a reference to Public Law 2055 reflecting that we must now, as a matter of law, perform an ICE at CD-3 for projects with a TPC over $100 million. 3. Section 2 notes that DOE Programs must now pay for ICRs and ICEs and reflects that PARS II must be

224

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

on Best PracticesStandards Development are below. CEDS 2010 Peer Review - Advanced Security Acceleration Project for the Smart Grid - James Nutaro, ORNL.pdf CEDS 2010 Peer...

225

Automatically Predicting Peer-Review Helpfulness Wenting Xiong  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Automatically Predicting Peer-Review Helpfulness Wenting Xiong University of Pittsburgh Department@cs.pitt.edu Abstract Identifying peer-review helpfulness is an im- portant task for improving the quality of feed- back that students receive from their peers. As a first step towards enhancing existing peer- review systems with new

Litman, Diane J.

226

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 Peer Review 6 Peer Review Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. The agenda and ESS program overview are available below. Day 1 morning session presentations Day 1 afternoon session presentations Day 2 morning session presentations Day 2 afternoon session presentations ESS 2006 Peer Review - Agenda.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - ESS Program Overview - John Boyes, SNL.pdf More Documents & Publications Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Innovations in ESS Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications

227

Peer review at the University of Troms : a study of time spent on reviewing and researchers opinions on peer review .  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??This thesis examines peer review at the University of Troms (UiT). It focuses on how much time is spent on reviewing at this particular institution, (more)

Refsdal, Maria

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

228

2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Full Presentations | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Full Presentations Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Full Presentations 2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Full Presentations The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 11 presentations over 2 days on August 7 - 8, 2012 at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY. The full presentations are available below. Presentation summaries are also available. 2012 R&M Peer Review - Transmission Investment Assessment Under Uncertainty - Ben Hobbs 2012 R&M Peer Review - Renewable Integration Through Risk-Limiting Dispatch - Pravin Varaiya 2012 R&M Peer Review - Development and Testing of New Tools - Ray Zimmerman 2012 R&M Peer Review - Commercialization of the SuperOPF Framework - Hsiao-Dong Chiang 2012 R&M Peer Review - Essence of Structure Preserving Network Reductions -

229

Energy Storage Systems 2009 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

09 Peer Review 09 Peer Review Energy Storage Systems 2009 Peer Review The DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted an annual peer review in Seattle, WA on October 8, 2009. The 1-day conference included welcoming remarks from OE's Imre Gyuk as well as a program overview from John Boyes of Sandia National Laboratories and 11 presentations on individual projects. The agenda, program overview, and project presentations are available below. ESS 2009 Peer Review - Agenda.pdf ESS 2009 Peer Review - DOE-ESS Overview - John Boyes, SNL.pdf ESS 2009 Peer Review - Long Island Bus NaS Battery Energy Storage Project - Steve Eckroad, EPRI.pdf ESS 2009 Peer Review - Development of an Integrated Power Controller Based on HT SOI and SiC - Joseph Henfling, SNL.pdf ESS 2009 Peer Review - Large Format Carbon Enhanced VRLA Battery Test

230

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 Peer Review 7 Peer Review Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. The agenda and ESS program overview presentation are below. Presentation categories Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies Utility & Commercial Applications of Advanced Energy Storage Systems International Energy Storage Programs Power Electronics Innovations in Energy Storage Systems ESS 2007 Peer Review - Agenda.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - Program Overview - John Boyes, SNL.pdf More Documents & Publications Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Agenda/Presentation List Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - International Energy Storage

231

Peer Review Plan Date: 6/27/12  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Plan Date: 6/27/12 Source Center: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Kansas Water Science at this time. Manner of Review, Selection of Reviewers, and Nomination Process: Peer review will be by individual letters. USGS will select the peer reviewers pursuant to requirements in Survey Manual chapter 502

Torgersen, Christian

232

Peer Review Plan Date: 5/8/2014  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Plan Date: 5/8/2014 Source Center: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Texas Water Science: Peer Review (http://www.usgs.gov/usgs- manual/500/502-3.html). Editorial staff at ES&T will select reviewers for the journal following their anonymous peer review process. Expected Number of Reviewers: Five

Torgersen, Christian

233

Multi-Function Fuel-Fired Heat Pump - 2013 Peer Review | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Pump - 2013 Peer Review Multi-Function Fuel-Fired Heat Pump - 2013 Peer Review Emerging Technologies Project for the 2013 Building Technologies Office's Program Peer Review...

234

Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

04 04 OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review INTRODUCTION This Bulletin establishes that important scientific information shall be peer reviewed by qualified specialists before it is disseminated by the federal government. We published a proposed Bulletin on September 15, 2003. Based on public comments, we published a revised proposal for additional comment on April 28, 2004. We are now finalizing the April version, with minor revisions responsive to the public's comments. The purpose of the Bulletin is to enhance the quality and credibility of the government's scientific information. We recognize that different types of peer review are appropriate for different types of information. Under this Bulletin, agencies are granted broad

235

Peer Review Plan Date: 1/17/2012  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Plan Date: 1/17/2012 Source Center: U.S Geological Survey (USGS) Oregon Water Science will select the peer reviewers pursuant to requirements in Survey Manual chapter 502.3--Fundamental Science Practices: Peer Review (http://www.usgs.gov/usgs-manual/500/502-3.html). Expected Number of Reviewers

Torgersen, Christian

236

Peer Review Plan Date: 8/20/2012  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Plan Date: 8/20/2012 Source Center: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Pacific Island Process: This review will be conducted via individual letters. The USGS will select the peer reviewers pursuant to requirements in Survey Manual chapter 502.3 -Fundamental Science Practices: Peer Review (http

Torgersen, Christian

237

Peer Review Plan Date: 11/26/12  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Plan Date: 11/26/12 Source Center: U.S Geological Survey (USGS) Washington Water will select the peer reviewers pursuant to requirements in Survey Manual chapter 502.3 - Fundamental Science Practices: Peer Review (http://www.usgs.gov/usgs-manual/500/502-3.html). Expected Number of Reviewers

Torgersen, Christian

238

The NIH Peer Review Sally A. Amero, Ph.D.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The NIH Peer Review Process Sally A. Amero, Ph.D. NIH Review Policy Officer Office of Extramural Research 2009 NIH Regional Seminars #12;22 The NIH Peer Review Process National Institutes of Health (ICs) Extramural and intramural programs 24 have funding authority #12;33 The NIH Peer Review Process

Grishok, Alla

239

Peer Review Plan Date: 4/20/2011  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Plan Date: 4/20/2011 Source Center: U.S Geological Survey (USGS) Oregon Water Science, and Nomination Process: Review will be by individual letters. USGS will select the peer reviewers pursuant to requirements in Survey Manual chapter 502.3--Fundamental Science Practices: Peer Review (http

Torgersen, Christian

240

Peer Review Plan Date: 11/22/2011  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Plan Date: 11/22/2011 Source Center: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Pacific Island Process: This review will be conducted via individual letters. The USGS will select the peer reviewers pursuant to requirements in Survey Manual chapter 502.3 -Fundamental Science Practices: Peer Review (http

Torgersen, Christian

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Truman State University Application To Establish A Peer Review Committee  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Truman State University Application To Establish A Peer Review Committee The following written information must be provided to and approved by the IRB before a Division/Discipline Peer Review Committee of the month preceding the month in which the new Peer Review Committee is to take effect. Once reviewed

Gering, Jon C.

242

Peer Review Plan Date: 4/18/2014  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Plan Date: 4/18/2014 Source Center: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Forest and Rangeland of Reviewers, and Nomination Process: USGS will select the peer reviewers pursuant to the requirements in Survey Manual chapter 502.3 ­ Fundamental Science Practices: Peer Review (http

Torgersen, Christian

243

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon presentations |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon 6 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. Presentations from the Day 2 afternoon session are below. ESS 2006 Peer Review - Energy Storage and Wyoming Wind Power - Mindi Farber de Anda, SAIC.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Hybrid Generation Simulator - David Trujillo, SNL.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Modular Energy Storage Benefit and Cost for Three Emerging Value Propositions - Susan Schoenung, Longitude 122 West.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - What's New - Sprint - Kevin Kenny.pdf

244

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 Peer Review - Day 2 morning 6 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. Presentations from the Day 2 morning session are below. ESS 2006 Peer Review - EESAT 2007 Conference Information - Georgianne Peek, SNL.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Ultracapacitor EnergyBridge UPS - Chris McKay, Northern Power.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Flywheel-based Frequency Regulation Demonstration Projects - Jim Arseneaux, Beacon Power.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Design of the FESS 20MW Frequency Regulation Plant -

245

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 afternoon presentations |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 afternoon Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 afternoon presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 afternoon presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. Presentations from the Day 1 afternoon session are below. ESS 2006 Peer Review - Laboratory Scale FACTS Conroller Development - Mariesa Crow, U Missouri, Rolla.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - 100kW Low Cost Energy Storage Inverter - Larry Rinehart, Rinehart Motions.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - ETO Light Power Converter for FACTS & Energy Storage Applications - Alex Huang, NCSU.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - High-Efficiency Compact SiC-based Power Converter

246

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review 2 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review The Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review included seven sessions over 2 days on June 12 - 13, 2012. Presentations are available through the individual session links. The agenda and participant list are available below. Presentations June 12 - Day 1: Session I, Session II, Session III, Session IV, Session V June 13 - Day 2: Session VI, Session VII 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Agenda 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Participant List More Documents & Publications 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 2

247

Energy Storage Systems 2014 Peer Review and Update Meeting |...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Energy Storage Systems 2014 Peer Review and Update Meeting OE's Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 17-19,...

248

Energy Storage Systems 2014 Peer Review Presentations - Session...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Storage Systems 2014 Peer Review Presentations - Session 9 OE's Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 17-19,...

249

Energy Storage Systems 2014 Peer Review Presentations - Session...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Storage Systems 2014 Peer Review Presentations - Session 1 OE's Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 17-19,...

250

Energy Storage Systems 2014 Peer Review Presentations - Session...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Storage Systems 2014 Peer Review Presentations - Session 5 OE's Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 17-19,...

251

Water Power Program Peer Reviews | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Peer Reviews Water Power Program Peer Reviews All programs within the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) are required to...

252

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems (CEDS) Peer Review...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Peer Review August 5-7 Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems (CEDS) Peer Review August 5-7 June 26, 2014 - 1:03pm Addthis The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy...

253

Home Performance with ENERGY STAR - 2014 BTO Peer Review | Department...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

ENERGY STAR - 2014 BTO Peer Review Home Performance with ENERGY STAR - 2014 BTO Peer Review Presenter: Ely Jacobsohn, U.S. Department of Energy The goal of Home Performance with...

254

Better Buildings Data and Summary Report - 2014 BTO Peer Review...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Better Buildings Data and Summary Report - 2014 BTO Peer Review Better Buildings Data and Summary Report - 2014 BTO Peer Review Presenter: Dale Hoffmeyer, U.S. Department of Energy...

255

2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Thermochemical Conversion...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Thermochemical Conversion 2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Thermochemical Conversion "This document summarizes the recommendations and evaluations provided by an...

256

2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Integrated Biorefineries...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Integrated Biorefineries 2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Integrated Biorefineries "This document summarizes the recommendations and evaluations provided by an...

257

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection National lab researchers,...

258

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Secure Communications Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Secure Communications National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia...

259

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Software Engineering Institute Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Software Engineering Institute National lab researchers, industry...

260

2014 Advanced Grid Modeling Program Peer Review Presentations Now Available  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

17 projects were presented at the 2014 Advanced Grid Modeling Peer Review. Presentations are now available for download.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Peer Reviewed: Examining the World Summit on Sustainable Development  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Peer Reviewed: Examining the World Summit on Sustainable Development ... Did the latest meeting really move the world forward toward sustainability? ...

Jerald Schnoor

2002-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

262

Jeffrey F. Kelly Peer-Reviewed Publications  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Jeffrey F. Kelly Peer-Reviewed Publications 23 August 2013 Oklahoma Biological Survey: www.animalmigration.org 55 Frick, WF, JR Shipley, P Heady, KM Kay, and JF Kelly. In Press. Seasonal reliance on nectar by an insectivorous bat revealed by stable isotopes. Oecologia 54 Kelly, JF, PB Chilson

Kelly, Jeff

263

Jeffrey F. Kelly Peer-Reviewed Publications  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Jeffrey F. Kelly Peer-Reviewed Publications 4 May 2013 Oklahoma Biological Survey and Department of Biology Office: 405-325-2440 University of Oklahoma E-mail: Jeffrey.F.Kelly@gmail.com Norman, OK 73019 Web: www.animalmigration.org 55 Coffman, JM, BT Bestelmeyer, JF Kelly, TF Wright, and Robert L. Schooley

Kelly, Jeff

264

ForPeerReview White Racialized Identities  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ForPeerReview White Racialized Identities 1 Empirical research into the racialization of white identities in British Sociology In their introduction to a collection of papers on whiteness, Twine and Gallagher (2007: 5) label the empirical studies of localised whiteness as it intersects with class, nation

Neirotti, Juan Pablo

265

Peer review plan muddies acid rain talks  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Bilateral U.S./Canadian talks on an acid rain treaty are being buffeted by bitter winds of national politics and uncertain science. The latest ill wind to blow north, as far as the Canadians are concerned, is the U.S. plan to have peer reviewed all ...

1982-05-10T23:59:59.000Z

266

Peer Review Plan Date: 11/28/2013  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Plan Date: 11/28/2013 Source Center: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Northern Rocky: USGS will select the peer reviewers pursuant to the requirements in Survey Manual chapter 502.3 ­ Fundamental Science Practices: Peer Review (http://www.usgs.gov/usgs-manual/500/502- 3.html). Expected Number

Torgersen, Christian

267

Using Peer Review to Teach Software Testing Joanna Smith  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Using Peer Review to Teach Software Testing Joanna Smith University of Texas at Austin joanna This paper explains how peer review can be used to teach software testing, an important skill that is typically not care- fully taught in most programming courses. The goals of such peer review are (1) to frame

Lin, Calvin

268

Final External Peer Review Report for Freeport Harbor, Texas  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Final External Peer Review Report for Freeport Harbor, Texas Draft Feasibility Report. W911NF-07-D-0001 Task Control Number: 08192 August 20, 2008 #12;FINAL EXTERNAL PEER REVIEW REPORT Battelle Final External Peer Review Report August 20, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

US Army Corps of Engineers

269

University of Glasgow -1-Reform of Peer Review: Response to  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

University of Glasgow -1- Reform of Peer Review: Response to Consultation Introduction & Summary The University of Glasgow welcomes the opportunity to comment on these proposals for the reform of peer review and the introduction of processes to scrutinise the economic impact of research within the peer review process and we

Glasgow, University of

270

Peer Review Plan Date: 6/9/2011  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Plan Date: 6/9/2011 Source Center: U. S. Geological Survey (USGS) Washington Water will be conducted via individual letters. The USGS will select the peer reviewers pursuant to requirements in Survey Manual chapter 502.3 -Fundamental Science Practices: Peer Review (http://www.usgs.gov/usgs-manual/500

Fleskes, Joe

271

Peer Review Plan Date: 1/31/2012  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Plan Date: 1/31/2012 Source Center: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Pacific Island://manoa.hawaii.edu/hpicesu/techr/177/default.htm) and is now being submitted to an outside peer-reviewed journal for publication. The manuscript will now be submitted to a journal, the suggestions of peer reviewers selected by the journal

Torgersen, Christian

272

Peer Review Plan Date: 7/23/2013  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Plan Date: 7/23/2013 Source Center: U.S Geological Survey (USGS) Oregon Water Science, and Nomination Process: Review will be by individual letters/memoranda/documents. USGS will select the peer reviewers pursuant to requirements in Survey Manual chapter 502.3--Fundamental Science Practices: Peer

Torgersen, Christian

273

Calibrated Peer Review Texas A&M University  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Calibrated Peer Review at Texas A&M University By Wendy L. Keeney-Kennicutt, Ph.D. Master with 3 of their peers' essays (randomly selected and anonymous) and their own · Review and rate using calibration questions · The scoring of peers is weighted by the student reviewer's competency score. 7 #12

274

Peer Review Plan Date: 4/20/2011  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Plan Date: 4/20/2011 Source Center: U.S Geological Survey (USGS) Oregon Water Science letters. USGS will select the peer reviewers pursuant to requirements in Survey Manual chapter 502.3--Fundamental Science Practices: Peer Review (http://www.usgs.gov/usgs-manual/500/502-3.html). Expected Number

Torgersen, Christian

275

Enhancing Peer Review: What Applicants Need to Know Now  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Enhancing Peer Review: What Applicants Need to Know Now Transcript Accompanying Video of Dr. Alan that have been charged with the implementation of a set of Enhancements to the NIH Peer Review system. Slide those changes are related to the peer review system. We will place particular emphasis on how

Bandettini, Peter A.

276

IN PRESS, ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR Positive Assortment for Peer Review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 IN PRESS, ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR Positive Assortment for Peer Review C. Athena Aktipis* Dept of positive assortment (the pairing of individuals with similar characteristics) to the peer review process who has submitted a journal article for peer-review knows how frustrating it is to wait for long

Thompson-Schill, Sharon

277

Peer Review Plan Date: 1/4/2011  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Plan Date: 1/4/2011 Source Center: U.S Geological Survey Arizona Water Science Center letters. USGS will select the peer reviewers pursuant to requirements in U.S. Geological Survey Manual chapter 502.3 -Fundamental Science Practices: Peer Review (http://www.usgs.gov/usgs-manual/500/502-3.html

Torgersen, Christian

278

Peer Review Plan Date: 12/20/2010  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Plan Date: 12/20/2010 Source Center: U.S Geological Survey (USGS) Oregon Water Science will be conducted via individual letters. The USGS will select the peer reviewers pursuant to requirements in Survey Manual chapter 502.3 -Fundamental Science Practices: Peer Review (http://www.usgs.gov/usgs-manual/500

Torgersen, Christian

279

Peer Review Plan Date: 05/14/2013  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Plan Date: 05/14/2013 Source Center: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Ohio Water Science/memoranda/documents. USGS has selected the peer reviewers pursuant to requirements in Survey Manual chapter 502.3--Fundamental Science Practices: Peer Review (http://www.usgs.gov/usgs-manual/500/502-3.html). Expected Number

Torgersen, Christian

280

Final External Peer Review Report for Boston Harbor Navigation Improvement  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Final External Peer Review Report for Boston Harbor Navigation Improvement Prepared by Battelle District Contract No. DACW33-03-D-0004 Delivery Order: CK01 June 3, 2008 #12;FINAL EXTERNAL PEER REVIEW ­ Boston Harbor External Peer Review Report Battelle June 2008 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary

US Army Corps of Engineers

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Peer Review Plan Date: 2/6/2014  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Plan Date: 2/6/2014 Source Center: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) St. Petersburg Coastal will select the peer reviewers pursuant to requirements in Survey Manual chapter 502.3--Fundamental Science Practices: Peer Review (http://www.usgs.gov/usgs-manual/500/502-3.html). Additionally the report is being

Torgersen, Christian

282

Peer Review Plan Date: 9/6/2013  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Plan Date: 9/6/2013 Source Center: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) St. Petersburg Coastal/memoranda/documents. USGS will select peer reviewers pursuant to requirements in Survey Manual chapter 502.3--Fundamental Science Practices: Peer Review (http://www.usgs.gov/usgs-manual/500/502-3.html). Expected Number

Torgersen, Christian

283

Peer Review Plan Date: 7/23/14  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Plan Date: 7/23/14 Source Center: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Core Science Systems letters and supporting documents. USGS will select the peer reviewers pursuant to requirements in Survey Manual chapter 502.3--Fundamental Science Practices: Peer Review (http://www.usgs.gov/usgs-manual/500

284

Peer Review Summary Document (12/20/2011)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary Document (12/20/2011) Peer Review Plan http://www.usgs.gov/peer_review/docs/white-mesa_uranium Migration of Radionuclides and Trace Elements from the White Mesa Uranium Mill to the Ute Mountain Ute with the USGS Utah Water Science Center. MS degree in Geology from the University of Utah followed by 22 years

Torgersen, Christian

285

2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Presentation Summaries |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Review - Presentation Summaries Review - Presentation Summaries 2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Presentation Summaries The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 11 presentations over 2 days on August 7 - 8, 2012 at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY. Presentation summaries are available below. The full presentations are also available. 2012 R&M Peer Review - Summary: Transmission Investment Under Uncertainty - Ben Hobbs 2012 R&M Peer Review - Summary: Renewable Integration Through Risk-Limiting Dispatch - Pravin Varaiya 2012 R&M Peer Review - Summary: Development and Testing of New Tools - Ray Zimmerman 2012 R&M Peer Review - Summary: Commercialization of the SuperOPF Framework - Hsiao-Dong Chiang 2012 R&M Peer Review - Summary: Essence of Structure Preserving Network

286

Ethics of Peer Review: A Guide for Manuscript Reviewers  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Ethics of Peer Review: A Guide for Manuscript Reviewers Case studies Sara Rockwell, Ph that this practice is not ethical. · Are there ethical issues? #12;A course developed with the support of the HHS to consider · Are there ethical issues that would preclude her from reviewing the paper? · Are there other

Yang, Sichun

287

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 morning presentations |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 morning 1 morning presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 morning presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. Presentations from the Day 1 morning session are below. ESS 2006 Peer Review - NAS Battery Performance at Charleston, WV - Ali Nourai, AEP.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Evaluation of the Kauai Island Utility Cooperative System for Energy Storage Potential - Abbas Akhil, SNL.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Iowa Stored Energy Plant - Bob Haug, ISEPA.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Superconducting Flywheel Development - Phil Johnson, Boeing.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Bipolar NiMH Battery Development and Testing - James

288

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon presentations |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 afternoon 2 afternoon presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 afternoon presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. Presentations from the Day 2 afternoon session are below. ESS 2006 Peer Review - Energy Storage and Wyoming Wind Power - Mindi Farber de Anda, SAIC.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Hybrid Generation Simulator - David Trujillo, SNL.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Modular Energy Storage Benefit and Cost for Three Emerging Value Propositions - Susan Schoenung, Longitude 122 West.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - What's New - Sprint - Kevin Kenny.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - What's New - Emerson Network Power - Paul Misar.pdf

289

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 1 Morning Session...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Review Presentations - Day 1 Morning Session 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 1 Morning Session The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its...

290

2015 Peer Review Agenda for the Geothermal Technologies Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Energy Department's Geothermal Technologies Office hosts its 2015 Peer Review on May 11-14, 2015, with a rigorous review of the technical project portfolio.

291

Developing an evidenced-based peer review policy.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??A peer review process was encouraged by a National Veterans Health Administration internal review team as a way to assess quality of care and documentation (more)

Marty, Claire Lund.

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

292

2012 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations 2 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available 2012 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations Available December 3, 2012 - 1:26pm Addthis Presentations from two peer reviews in September are now available. The Consortium for Electric Reliability Technology Solutions (CERTS) Transmission Reliability R&D Load as a Resource (LAAR) Program peer review included five presentations on September 20, 2012, hosted by DOE at the Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. DOE's Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on September 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included nine sessions and two poster sessions. Addthis Related Articles 2013 Transmission Reliability R&D Peer Review Presentations Available

293

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 1 Morning Session |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Morning Session Morning Session 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 1 Morning Session The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from the Day 1 morning session are below. Moderator: Dan Ton, DOE 2012 SG Peer Review - Smart Inverter Controls and Microgrid Interoperation at DECC - Tom Rizy, ORNL 2012 SG Peer Review - CERTS Microgrid Test Bed - Joe Eto, LBNL 2012 SG Peer Review - Energy Surety, Microgrids - Mike Hightower, SNL 2012 SG Peer Review - Smart Grid Standards and Conformance Testing - Tom Basso, NREL 2012 SG Peer Review - GridLAB-D and Integrated T&D Control - David Chassin,

294

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Morning Session |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Morning Session Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Morning Session 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Morning Session The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from Day 2 morning session are below. Moderator: Merrill Smith, DOE 2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: Pacific Northwest Smart Grid Demonstration Project - Ron Melton, Battelle Memorial Institute 2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: LADWP Smart Grid Regional Demonstration Project - Mukhlesur Bhuiyan, City of Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power 2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: AEP Ohio gridSMART Demonstration

295

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): ARPA-E Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): ARPA-E Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. ARPA-E project presentations from the first poster session on Day 1, chaired by DOE's Mark Johnson, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Dispatchable Wind--Wind Power on Demand - Ian Lawson, General Compression ESS 2012 Peer Review - Novel Regenerative Fuel Cells based on Anion Exchange Membranes - Katherine Ayers, Proton Onsite ESS 2012 Peer Review - Low Cost, High-Energy Density Flywheel Storage Grid

296

Peer Review Committees 2011-2012 REVIEWEES COMMITTEES  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Committees 2011-2012 REVIEWEES COMMITTEES Instructors/Lecturers Opoku-Edusei Bierman that their classes are visited. We will hold our peer review meeting in mid-April. Therefore, I ask that signed, Carleton Kocher (Chair), Fenster, Via Popper (Chair), Cohen, Fagan Sukharev (Chair), Cummings, Higgins Peer

297

What is it? The Process Reviewing How-To The Peer Review Process  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

What is it? The Process Reviewing How-To The Peer Review Process John Stockie CFD Group Meeting. This paper will go through a peer review process. Once published, you will eventually be asked to review is Peer Review? 2 The Process 3 Reviewing How-To Academic Journal Publishing John Stockie � SFU 3/20 #12

Stockie, John

298

Peer Review Committees 2010-2011 REVIEWEES COMMITTEES  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Committees 2010-2011 REVIEWEES COMMITTEES Instructors/Lecturers Compton Jensen, Sukharev Kocher (Chair), Fenster, Ades Borgia (Chair), Dudash, Bely Peer review assignments are being made's CV, FAR report, scantron teaching reviews and last year's review report will be made available

299

Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review A consensus peer review of the current technical basis and the planned experimental and modeling program for the prediction of the long-term performance of waste package materials being considered for use in a proposed repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review A Compilation of Special Topic Reports Wastepackagematerials_PPRP_final.pdf Evaluation of the Final Report: Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review Panel Multi-Purpose_Canister_System_Evaluation.pdf More Documents & Publications Preliminary Report on Dual-Purpose Canister Disposal Alternatives (FY13) A Review of Stress Corrosion Cracking/Fatigue Modeling for Light Water

300

Review of Internet Service Providers and Peering Matthew Renzelmann  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Review of Internet Service Providers and Peering Matthew Renzelmann February 11, 2007 1 Introduction This paper discusses the issues that lead ISPs to con- sider peering or transit arrangements with one an- other. Norton considers the technical reasons for peering as well as the financial

Akella, Aditya

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review included seven sessions over 2 days on June 12 - 13, 2012. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through V) are available below. Session I: Dan Trudnowski, Ning Zhou, Mani Venkatasubramanian Session II: Brett Amidan, Bharat Bhargava, Ning Zhou Session III: Ken Martin, Mani Venkatasubramanian Session IV: Jeff Dagle, Jim Dyer, Joe Gracia, Joe Eto Session V: Joe Eto 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Measurement-Based Stability Assessment - Dan Trudnowski, U Montana 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Mode Meter Development - Ning

302

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations 2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations 2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 6 sessions over 2 days on August 6 - 7, 2013. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through IV) are available below. Session I: Ben Hobbs (Johns Hopkins), Kameshwar Poolla (UC Berkeley) Session II: Ray Zimmerman (Cornell), Hsiao-Dong Chiang (Cornell) Session III: Shmuel Oren (UC Berkeley), Dan Tylavsky (U Arizona), Tom Overbye (U Illinois) Session IV: Lindsay Anderson (Cornell), HyungSeon Oh (Cornell) 2013 R&M Peer Review - Assessing Transmission Investments Under Uncertainty - Ben Hobbs, Johns Hopkins 2013 R&M Peer Review - Coordinated Aggregation of Distributed Energy

303

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Poster Poster Session 2 (Day 2): SBIR Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): SBIR Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. SBIR project presentations from the second poster session on Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Georgianne Huff, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Higher Power Motor for ARPA-E Flywheel - Jim Arseneaux, Beacon Power ESS 2012 Peer Review - Acid Based Blend Membranes for Redox Flow Batteries - Alan Cisar, Lynntech ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Membrane - David Ofer, Tiax ESS 2012 Peer Review - Sodium Intercalation Battery for Stationary Storage

304

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 2  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 Presentations 2 Presentations 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations The Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review included seven sessions over 2 days on June 12 - 13, 2012. Presentations from Day 2 (Sessions VI and VII) are available below. Session VI: Yuri Makarov, Henry Huang, Jim McCalley Session VII: Carlos Martinez, Pete Sauer, Gil Tam 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Real-Time Wide-Area Montoring Tool Based on CELL Method - Yuri Makarov, PNNL 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Modal Analysis for Grid Operations (MANGO) - Henry Huang, PNNL 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - New Security Tools for Real-Time Operations - Jim McCalley, Iowa State 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Automatic Reliability Reports

305

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 (Day 1): National Lab Projects 1 (Day 1): National Lab Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): National Lab Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. National lab project presentations from the first poster session on Day 1, chaired by DOE's Mark Johnson, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Metrics for Storage and Pre-Standards Analyses - David Rose, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Oahu Energy Storage Study - Michael Kintner-Meyer, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Modeling - Soowhan Kim, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Engineered Gate Oxides for Wide Bandgap Semiconductor MOSFETs - Jon Ihlefeld, SNL

306

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects 2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. ARRA project presentations from the second poster session on Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Georgianne Huff, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - 20 MW Flywheel Frequency Regulation Plant - Jim Arseneaux, Beacon Power ESS 2012 Peer Review - Advanced Implementation of Community ESS for Grid Support - Haukur Asgeirsson, Detroit Edison ESS 2012 Peer Review - Notrees Wind Storage - Jeff Gates, Duke Energy ESS 2012 Peer Review - Compressed Air Energy Storage - Robert Booth,

307

2012 Peer Reviews in June and July | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2012 Peer Reviews in June and July 2012 Peer Reviews in June and July 2012 Peer Reviews in June and July June 12, 2012 - 9:31am Addthis The Department of Energy will hold peer reviews for the Real Time Reliability Management program and the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems (CEDS) program this summer. Peer reviews are an opportunity for energy sector stakeholders to hear updates on ongoing and upcoming projects, provide feedback to program managers, and network with experts from industry, academia, and national laboratories. June 12-13, 2012: Real Time Reliability Management (RTGRM) The Transmission Reliability R&D Program will conduct a peer review of the Real Time Grid Reliability Management RTGRM is part of DOE's Transmission Reliability R&D Program and includes projects in support of the North

308

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): University Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): University Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. University project presentations from the second poster session on Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Georgianne Huff, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Strategies for Liquid-Anode Alkali Batteries of High Energy Density Operating at 0 to 100 C - C Austen Angell, AZ State ESS 2012 Peer Review - Iron Based Flow Batteries for Low Cost Grid Level Energy Storage - Jesse Wainright, Case Western Reserve

309

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects 2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 2 (Day 2): ARRA Projects The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. ARRA project presentations from the second poster session on Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Georgianne Huff, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - 20 MW Flywheel Frequency Regulation Plant - Jim Arseneaux, Beacon Power ESS 2012 Peer Review - Advanced Implementation of Community ESS for Grid Support - Haukur Asgeirsson, Detroit Edison ESS 2012 Peer Review - Notrees Wind Storage - Jeff Gates, Duke Energy ESS 2012 Peer Review - Compressed Air Energy Storage - Robert Booth,

310

2012 Peer Reviews in June and July | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Peer Reviews in June and July Peer Reviews in June and July 2012 Peer Reviews in June and July June 12, 2012 - 9:31am Addthis The Department of Energy will hold peer reviews for the Real Time Reliability Management program and the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems (CEDS) program this summer. Peer reviews are an opportunity for energy sector stakeholders to hear updates on ongoing and upcoming projects, provide feedback to program managers, and network with experts from industry, academia, and national laboratories. June 12-13, 2012: Real Time Reliability Management (RTGRM) The Transmission Reliability R&D Program will conduct a peer review of the Real Time Grid Reliability Management RTGRM is part of DOE's Transmission Reliability R&D Program and includes projects in support of the North

311

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 1 Afternoon Session |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 Afternoon Session 1 Afternoon Session 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 1 Afternoon Session The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from Day 1 afternoon sessions are below. Moderators: Eric Lightner and Merrill Smith 2012 SG Peer Review - GridWise Architecture Council - Ron Melton, PNNL 2012 SG Peer Review - Expanded Demand Response Functionality - Graham Parker, PNNL 2012 SG Peer Review - Integrated Smart Distribution RD&D Project - Mani Venkata, Alstom 2012 SG Peer Review - Enhanced DMS Capabilities Supporting Distribution Network DER - Tristan Glenwright, Boeing

312

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial 7 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. Eighteen presentations were divided into categories; those related to utility, commercial, and rail applications of advanced energy storage systems are below. Other presentation categories were: Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies International Energy Storage Programs Power Electronics Innovations in Energy Storage Systems ESS 2007 Peer Review - Application of Large-Scale ESS in AEP - Ali Nourai, AEP.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - Iowa Stored Energy Park - Kent Holst, ISEP.pdf

313

Peer Review Committees 2012-2013 REVIEWEES COMMITTEES  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Committees 2012-2013 REVIEWEES COMMITTEES Instructors/Lecturers Bierman Woodham Gedan one class is visited. We will hold our peer review meeting(s) in April. Therefore, I ask that signed (Chair), Borgia, Higgins Fenster (Chair), Kocher, Inouye Reviewers listed in bold have been assigned

314

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Utility & Commercial Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Utility & Commercial Applications Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. Eighteen presentations were divided into categories; those related to utility, commercial, and rail applications of advanced energy storage systems are below. Other presentation categories were: Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies International Energy Storage Programs Power Electronics Innovations in Energy Storage Systems ESS 2007 Peer Review - Application of Large-Scale ESS in AEP - Ali Nourai, AEP.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - Iowa Stored Energy Park - Kent Holst, ISEP.pdf

315

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Innovations in ESS Presentations  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Innovations in ESS Innovations in ESS Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Innovations in ESS Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. Eighteen presentations were divided into categories; those related to innovations in energy storage systems are below. Other presentation categories were: Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies Utility & Commercial Applications of Advanced Energy Storage Systems International Energy Storage Programs Power Electronics ESS 2007 Peer Review - Evaluation of Lead-Carbon Storage Devices for Utility Applications - Enders Dickinson, MeadWestvaco.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - High Voltage Electrochemical Capacitor - David

316

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Power Electronics Presentations |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Power Electronics Power Electronics Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Power Electronics Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. Eighteen presentations were divided into categories; those related to power electronics are below. Other presentation categories were: Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies Utility & Commercial Applications of Advanced Energy Storage Systems International Energy Storage Programs Innovations in Energy Storage Systems ESS 2007 Peer Review - StatCom with Energy Storage to Smooth Intermittent Power Output of Wind Farms - Mesut Baran, NC State.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - Cyber-Physical Systems Distributed Control - Mariesa

317

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - International Energy Storage  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

International Energy International Energy Storage Program Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - International Energy Storage Program Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September 27, 2007 in San Francisco, CA. Eighteen presentations were divided into categories; those related to international energy storage programs are below. Other presentation categories were: Economics - Benefit Studies and Environment Benefit Studies Utility & Commercial Applications of Advanced Energy Storage Systems Power Electronics Innovations in Energy Storage Systems ESS 2007 Peer Review - DOE-CEC Energy Storage Program FY07 Projects - Daniel Borneo, SNL.pdf ESS 2007 Peer Review - Joint NYSERDA-DOE Energy Storage Initiative Projects

318

2012 Transmission and Energy Storage Peer Review Presentations...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

by DOE at the Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. DOE's Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on September 26 - 28,...

319

2014 Water Power Program Peer Review Compiled Presentations: Hydropower Technologies  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This document contains the compiled hydropower technologies presentations from the U.S. Department of Energy 2014 Water Power Program Peer Review, held February 25-27, 2014.

320

2014 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

High Penetration of Renewables - Dan Tylavsky 2014 R&M Peer Review - Enabling Open Access Energy Storage in Electric Power Networks - Eilyan Bitar More Documents & Publications...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Microsoft Word - PeerReview_SAR.doc | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

- PeerReviewCCSP.doc Microsoft Word - Cross Reference Matrix Introduction.doc DRAFT NEPA Guidance on Consideration of the Effects of Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions...

322

2014 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review- Day 1 Presentations  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included 6 sessions over 2 days on June 3 - 4. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through IV) are available here.

323

2014 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review- Day 2 Presentations  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included 6 sessions over 2 days on June 3 - 4, 2014. Presentations from Day 2 (Sessions V and VI) are available here.

324

Geothermal Technologies Office 2012 Peer Review Report | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Report 2010 Geothermal Technology Program Peer Review Report Tracer Methods for Characterizing Fracture Creation in Enhanced Geothermal Systems; 2010 Geothermal Technology Program...

325

2010 Geothermal Technology Program Peer Review Report | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Fractures Using Technology at High Temperatures and Depths - Geothermal Ultrasonic Fracture Imager (GUFI); 2010 Geothermal Technology Program Peer Review Report Fielding of...

326

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Infrastructure for the Power Grid (TCIPG) Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Trustworthy Cyber Infrastructure for the Power Grid (TCIPG)...

327

ORISE: Enhancing Peer Review Tools and Services to Support DOE...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Enhancing Tools and Services to Support DOE Research Improving a complex peer review process through convenient, real-time data Businessman reading tablet computer When it comes to...

328

Building Energy Codes Program Overview - 2014 BTO Peer Review...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Jeremiah Williams, U.S. Department of Energy This presentation at the 2014 Peer Review provided an overview of the Building Technologies Office's Building Building Energy Codes...

329

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Practice DesignConfiguration Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Best Practice DesignConfiguration National lab researchers, industry...

330

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentatio...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Visualization and Modeling Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Visualization and Modeling National lab researchers, industry partners, and...

331

Building Energy Codes Program Overview - 2014 BTO Peer Review...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

David Cohan, U.S. Department of Energy This presentation at the 2014 Peer Review provided an overview of the Building Technologies Office's Building Energy Codes Program. Through...

332

Peer Reviewed: Hard Times for Innovative Cleanup Technology  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Peer Reviewed: Hard Times for Innovative Cleanup Technology ... What can be done to remove market barriers to new groundwater and soil remediation technologies? ...

Jacqueline A. MacDonald

2011-06-08T23:59:59.000Z

333

Autotune - 2013 BTO Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

More Documents & Publications Autotune EnergyPlus - 2013 Peer Review Architecture firm Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM) used EnergyPlus to design a new 380,000...

334

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Novel High Energy Density Dielectrics...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

National Laboratories 2012 DOE ESS Peer Review Temperature Energy Response Time Cost New BZT-BT Ceramics Improve upon strengths of ceramics (ripple, temperature) with higher...

335

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review 2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review 2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 13 presentations over 2 days on August 6 - 7, 2013 at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY. Presentations are available through the links. The agenda and list of presentations are included below. The Reliability and Markets activity of the Transmission Reliability program researches, develops, and implements electricity infrastructure and market simulations that integrate economics and engineering principles. The activity helps to ensure electric reliability, while also improving the efficiency and economics of market operations. Day 1: August 6 Session I Transmission Investment Assessment Under Uncertainty, Ben Hobbs,

336

Buildings Performance Database - 2013 BTO Peer Review | Department...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

More Documents & Publications Building America System Research Better Buildings Alliance Multi-Function Fuel-Fired Heat Pump - 2013 Peer Review Buildings Home About Emerging...

337

Review of the Projects Peer Review Panel and the Project Research and Development Scheme Summary Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Review of the Projects Peer Review Panel and the Project Research and Development Scheme Summary Peer Review Panel (PPRP) process and the Project Research and Development (PRD) scheme to develop to funding can sometimes be too long with some delays occurring after the peer review process; Proposals

338

Evaluating Topic-Word Review Analysis for Understanding Student Peer Review Performance  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Evaluating Topic-Word Review Analysis for Understanding Student Peer Review Performance Wenting of an application based on the topic terms. Previ- ously, we proposed RevExplore, an interactive peer-review analytic tool that supports teachers in making sense of large volumes of student peer reviews. To better

Litman, Diane J.

339

Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Peer Reviews | U.S. DOE Office of  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Peer Reviews High Energy Physics (HEP) HEP Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of HEP Funding Opportunities Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Merit / Review Policies Early Career Research Opportunities in High Energy Physics Graduate Fellows in High Energy Theory Guidelines Advisory Committees News & Resources Contact Information High Energy Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-25/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3624 F: (301) 903-2597 E: sc.hep@science.doe.gov More Information » Peer Merit / Review Policies Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Peer Reviews Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page

340

SRS Waste Solidification Building Project Peer Review, July 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SRS-2011-07-15 SRS-2011-07-15 Site: Savannah River Site, NA-26 Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Waste Solidification Building Project Peer Review Dates of Activity : 07/12/2011 - 07/15/2011 Report Preparer: James Lockridge Activity Description/Purpose: At the request of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Office of Enterprise Project Management (NA- APM-20), the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), provided an expert to review the Waste Solidification Building (WSB) startup programs and procedures associated with worker safety and health, environment, and security. Criteria for the review was detailed in the Criteria,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy Storage  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

& Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Presentations Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Presentations The 2008 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) was held in Washington DC on Sept. 29-30, 2008. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. The 2008 agenda was composed of 28 projects that covered a broad range of new and ongoing, state-of-the-art, energy storage and power electronics technologies, including updates on the collaborations among DOE/ESPE, CEC in California, and NYSERDA in New York. Energy Storage Systems (ESS) presentations are available below. ESPE 2008 Peer Review - EAC Energy Storage Subcommittee - Brad Roberts, S&C

342

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronics  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

& Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronics (PE) Systems Presentations Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Power Electronics (PE) Systems Presentations The 2008 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) was held in Washington DC on Sept. 29-30, 2008. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. The 2008 agenda was composed of 28 projects that covered a broad range of new and ongoing, state-of-the-art, energy storage and power electronics technologies, including updates on the collaborations among DOE/ESPE, CEC in California, and NYSERDA in New York. Power Electronics (PE) Systems presentations are available below. ESPE 2008 Peer Review - High Power Density Silicon Carbide Power Electronic

343

Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge National Laboratory ...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Review, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - July 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - July 2011 July 2011 Review of Selected Elements of Emergency...

344

Independent Oversight Review, Rocky Flats Environmental Technology...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Review, Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site - March 2000 Independent Oversight Review, Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site - March 2000 March 2000 Review of the Rocky...

345

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

by the Bonneville Power Administration (Bonneville). The Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP) and peer reviewIndependent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council 851 SW 6 th to the Northwest Power Act directed the Northwest Power and Conservation Council (Council) to appoint an 11-member

346

Final External Peer Review Report for Tamiami Trail Limited Reevaluation Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Final External Peer Review Report for Tamiami Trail Limited Reevaluation Report By Battelle......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of External Peer Review......................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Identification and Selection of External Peer Reviewers

US Army Corps of Engineers

347

Four Draft Working Papers: PEER REVIEW IN ACADEMIC PROMOTION AND PUBLISHING: Its Meaning, Locus, and Future  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Brown, Tracey. 2009. Peer Review Survey 2009: PreliminaryCSHE/AWMF Workshop on Peer Review April 5-6, 2010 Davis,Ellison, Glenn. 2007. Is Peer Review in Decline? National

Harley, Diane, Ph.D., Principal Investigator and Sophia Krzys Acord

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

348

EXTERNAL PEER REVIEW REPORT Sabine-Neches Waterway (SNWW) Channel Improvement Plan (CIP) Draft Feasibility  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FINAL EXTERNAL PEER REVIEW REPORT for Sabine-Neches Waterway (SNWW) Channel Improvement Plan (CIP, policy, or decision, unless so designated by other documentation. #12;FINAL ­ SNWW External Peer Review......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of External Peer Review

US Army Corps of Engineers

349

Residential Building Integration Program Overview- 2014 BTO Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presenter: David Lee, U.S. Department of Energy This presentation at the 2014 Peer Review provided an overview of the Building Technologies Office's Residential Building Integration Program. Through robust feedback, the BTO Program Peer Review enhances existing efforts and improves future designs.

350

Emerging Technologies Program Overview- 2014 BTO Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presenter: Pat Phelan, U.S. Department of Energy This presentation at the 2014 Peer Review provided an overview of the Building Technologies Office's Emerging Technologies Program. Through robust feedback, the BTO Program Peer Review enhances existing efforts and improves future designs.

351

Appliance Standards Program Overview- 2014 BTO Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presenter: John Cymbalsky, U.S. Department of Energy This presentation at the 2014 Peer Review provided an overview of the Building Technologies Office's Appliance and Equipment Standards Program. Through robust feedback, the BTO Program Peer Review enhances existing efforts and improves future designs.

352

Commercial Building Integration Program Overview- 2014 BTO Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presenter: Arah Schuur, U.S. Department of Energy This presentation at the 2014 Peer Review provided an overview of the Building Technologies Office's Appliance and Equipment Standards Program. Through robust feedback, the BTO Program Peer Review enhances existing efforts and improves future designs.

353

Building Energy Codes Implementation Overview- 2014 BTO Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presenter: Jeremiah Williams, U.S. Department of Energy This presentation at the 2014 Peer Review provided an overview of the Building Technologies Office's Building Energy Codes Implementation activities. Through robust feedback, the BTO Program Peer Review enhances existing efforts and improves future designs.

354

Building Energy Codes Program Overview- 2014 BTO Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presenter: Jeremiah Williams, U.S. Department of Energy This presentation at the 2014 Peer Review provided an overview of the Building Technologies Office's Building Building Energy Codes Program activities. Through robust feedback, the BTO Program Peer Review enhances existing efforts and improves future designs.

355

Building Energy Codes Program Overview- 2014 BTO Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presenter: David Cohan, U.S. Department of Energy This presentation at the 2014 Peer Review provided an overview of the Building Technologies Office's Building Energy Codes Program. Through robust feedback, the BTO Program Peer Review enhances existing efforts and improves future designs.

356

Window and Envelope Technologies Overview- 2014 BTO Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presenter: Karma Sawyer, U.S. Department of Energy This presentation at the 2014 Peer Review provided an overview of the Building Technologies Office's Window and Envelope Technologies activities. Through robust feedback, the BTO Program Peer Review enhances existing efforts and improves future designs.

357

ForPeerReview The Biopolitics of Food Provisioning  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ForPeerReview The Biopolitics of Food Provisioning Journal: Transactions of the Institute geopolitics Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers #12;ForPeerReview The Biopolitics of Food the question of food provisioning in Europe's colonies where in fact the drive to eliminate non-market access

358

ForPeerReview PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE OF OFFSHORE WIND POWER  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ForPeerReview PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE OF OFFSHORE WIND POWER PROJECTS IN THE UNITED STATES Journal: Wind, Andrew; Minerals Management Service Keywords: offshore wind power, public opinion, social acceptancePeerReview 1 PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE OF OFFSHORE WIND POWER PROJECTS IN THE UNITED STATES Jeremy Firestone*, Willett

Firestone, Jeremy

359

Efficiency Data Management Overview- 2014 BTO Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presenter: Elena Alschuler, U.S. Department of Energy This presentation at the 2014 Peer Review provided an overview of the Building Technologies Office's Efficiency Data Management activities. Through robust feedback, the BTO Program Peer Review enhances existing efforts and improves future designs.

360

Small Buildings and Small Portfolios Overview- 2014 BTO Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presenter: Glenn Schatz, U.S. Department of Energy This presentation at the 2014 Peer Review provided an overview of the Building Technologies Office's Small Buildings and Small Portfolios activities. Through robust feedback, the BTO Program Peer Review enhances existing efforts and improves future designs.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Commercial Building Demonstration and Deployment Overview- 2014 BTO Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation: Kristen Taddonio, U.S. Department of Energy This presentation at the 2014 Peer Review provided an overview of the Building Technologies Office's Commercial Building Demonstration and Deployment activities. Through robust feedback, the BTO Program Peer Review enhances existing efforts and improves future designs.

362

2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 Presentations 1 Presentations 2012 Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Advanced Applications Research & Development Peer Review included seven sessions over 2 days on June 12 - 13, 2012. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through V) are available below. Session I: Dan Trudnowski, Ning Zhou, Mani Venkatasubramanian Session II: Brett Amidan, Bharat Bhargava, Ning Zhou Session III: Ken Martin, Mani Venkatasubramanian Session IV: Jeff Dagle, Jim Dyer, Joe Gracia, Joe Eto Session V: Joe Eto 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Measurement-Based Stability Assessment - Dan Trudnowski, U Montana 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Mode Meter Development - Ning Zhou, PNNL 2012 Advanced Applications R&D Peer Review - Oscillation Monitoring System

363

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment (TSPA) Peer Review Panel for predicting the performance of a repository at Yucca Mountain. TSPA First Interim Report - June 20, 1997 TSPA Second Interim Report - December 12, 1997 TSPA Third Interim Report - March, 1998 TSPA Final Report - February 11, 1999 Joint NEA-IAEA International Peer Review of the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project's Total System Performance Assessment Supporting the Site Recommendation Process - December, 2001 More Documents & Publications Yucca Mountain Science and Engineering Report TSPA Model Development and Sensitivity Analysis of Processes Affecting Performance of a Salt Repository for Disposal of Heat-Generating Nuclear

364

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment (TSPA) Peer Review Panel for predicting the performance of a repository at Yucca Mountain. TSPA First Interim Report - June 20, 1997 TSPA Second Interim Report - December 12, 1997 TSPA Third Interim Report - March, 1998 TSPA Final Report - February 11, 1999 Joint NEA-IAEA International Peer Review of the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project's Total System Performance Assessment Supporting the Site Recommendation Process - December, 2001 More Documents & Publications Yucca Mountain Science and Engineering Report TSPA Model Development and Sensitivity Analysis of Processes Affecting Performance of a Salt Repository for Disposal of Heat-Generating Nuclear

365

2005 Electric Distribution Peer Review - Agenda and Presentations |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Information Center » Library » Peer Reviews » 2005 Electric Information Center » Library » Peer Reviews » 2005 Electric Distribution Peer Review - Agenda and Presentations 2005 Electric Distribution Peer Review - Agenda and Presentations Electric Distribution R&D FY05 Annual Program and Peer Review Meeting April 19 & 20, 2005 Georgia Tech Conference Center Atlanta, Georgia Agenda (PDF 96 KB) Plenary Sessions Welcome and Our New Office of Electricity and Energy Assurance - Kevin Kolevar, DOE Overview of the Electric Distribution R&D - Eric Lightner, DOE Presentation (PDF 883 KB). GridWise Architectural Council - Rik Drummond, Drummond Group, Inc. Presentation (PDF 1.5 MB). Advanced Grid Application Consortium (GridApp) - James Crane, Exelon Corp. Presentation (PDF 1.6 MB). Session 1: Monitoring and Load Management Technologies

366

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient Product Procurement Portfolio Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient Product...

367

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting June 16, 2014...

368

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review - Agenda  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Page 1 of 3 Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Page 1 of 3 U.S. Department of Energy Smart Grid R&D Peer Review San Diego Gas & Electric Energy Innovation Center 4760 Clairemont Mesa Blvd San Diego, California June 7-8, 2012 AGENDA Thursday, June 7, 2012 8:00 am Registration and Continental Breakfast 8:30 am - 8:40 am Welcome David Geier, Vice President Electric Operations, San Diego Gas & Electric 8:40 am - 9:00 am OE's R&D Division/Smart Grid R&D Program Hank Kenchington/Dan Ton, U.S. Department of Energy Moderator - Dan Ton, U.S. Department of Energy 9:00 am - 9:30 am Smart Inverter Controls and Microgrid Interoperation at DECC Tom Rizy, ORNL 9:30 am - 10:00 am CERTS Microgrid Test Bed Joe Eto, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

369

peer  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 9 AUDIT REPORT THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S PEER REVIEW PRACTICES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE OF AUDIT SERVICES APRIL 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Acting Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION : Audit Report on "The Department of Energy's Peer Review Practices" BACKGROUND Fulfilling the requirements of the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 has presented Federal science agencies with the challenge of defining ways to quantify and evaluate the outcomes of research. Measuring research program performance is particularly important for the Department of Energy because of its substantial investment (approximately $7 billion in Fiscal Year 1996) in research and development

370

Independent Oversight Review, Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) PortsmouthPaducah Project Office (PPPO). The objective of the Independent...

371

Peer Review Considerations Shanta Rajaram, PhD.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Considerations Shanta Rajaram, PhD. Scientific Review Branch NINDS #12;Review: Where/preclinical & clinical. 6-8 reviewers/application. A telephone-assisted "reverse site visit" Investigators available on standby for questions during the time window their proposals get discussed. Confidential #12;Review

372

Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Site - September 2013 ...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Hanford Site - September 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Site - September 2013 September 2013 Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Hanford...

373

Independent Oversight Focused Program Review, Argonne National...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Focused Program Review, Argonne National Laboratory-West - May 2001 Independent Oversight Focused Program Review, Argonne National Laboratory-West - May 2001 May 2001 Focused...

374

Independent Oversight Review, Argonne National Laboratory - November...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Argonne National Laboratory - November 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Argonne National Laboratory - November 2011 November 2011 Review of the Argonne National Laboratory...

375

Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge National Laboratory ...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

National Laboratory - January 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - January 2013 January 2013 Review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux...

376

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Operations Office...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Savannah River Operations Office - July 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Operations Office - July 2013 July 2013 Review of the Employee Concerns Program at the...

377

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - July 2014 Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility - January 2012...

378

Independent Oversight Review, Bonneville Power Administration...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

and Security, conduct an independent review of the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) safety management program. The review is one of several BPA initiatives to improve...

379

Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Federal - June 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Federal - June 2012 June 2012 Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project -...

380

Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Contractor - June 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Contractor - June 2012 June 2012 Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

January 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - January 2013 January 2013 Review of the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant...

382

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Laboratory Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility - January 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility -...

383

2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 Presentations 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included six sessions over 2 days on June 27 - 28, 2013. Presentations from Day 2 (Sessions V and VI) are available below. Session V: Ken Martin (EPG), Jim Thorp (Virginia Tech), Scott Ghiocel (RPI), Mani Venkatasubramanian (WSU) Session VI: Pete Sauer (U Illinois), Carlos Martinez (ASR), Gil Tam (EPG) 2013 TR Review - Data Validation & Conditioning - Ken Martin, EPG 2013 TR Review - Synchrophasor Data Conditioning and Validation - Jim Thorp, Virginia Tech 2013 TR Review - PMU-based Voltage Stability - Scott Ghiocel, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 2013 TR Review - Oscillation Monitoring System - Mani Venkatasubramanian,

384

2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 Presentations 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 2 Presentations The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included six sessions over 2 days on June 27 - 28, 2013. Presentations from Day 2 (Sessions V and VI) are available below. Session V: Ken Martin (EPG), Jim Thorp (Virginia Tech), Scott Ghiocel (RPI), Mani Venkatasubramanian (WSU) Session VI: Pete Sauer (U Illinois), Carlos Martinez (ASR), Gil Tam (EPG) 2013 TR Review - Data Validation & Conditioning - Ken Martin, EPG 2013 TR Review - Synchrophasor Data Conditioning and Validation - Jim Thorp, Virginia Tech 2013 TR Review - PMU-based Voltage Stability - Scott Ghiocel, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 2013 TR Review - Oscillation Monitoring System - Mani Venkatasubramanian,

385

MJG:Peer Review, 5/00 1 M. J. Gouge  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

MJG:Peer Review, 5/00 1 M. J. Gouge Oak Ridge National Laboratory Fueling Program Peer Review ORNL May 10, 2000 #12;MJG:Peer Review, 5/00 2 · provide hydrogenic fuel to maintain the plasma density, and for plasma discharge termination on demand. #12;MJG:Peer Review, 5/00 3 · Gas fueling prototype testing

386

Glass Buttes Exploration and Drilling: 2010 Geothermal Technologies Program Peer Review Presentation, Walsh, et al, Ormat  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Glass Buttes Exploration and Drilling: 2010 Geothermal Technologies Program Peer Review Presentation, Walsh, et al, Ormat

Ezra Zemach

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

387

Peer Review at NIH in 2010 and SFN-October, 2009  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review at NIH in 2010 and Beyond SFN- October, 2009 Alan L. Willard, Ph.D. AW135Y.nih.gov and click on the "Grants" tab OR 2. do a Google search for "NIH peer review" or "enhancing peer review" OR memorize this: http://enhancing-peer-review.nih.gov #12;Today's Goals 1. Describe NIH grant application

388

2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 Presentations 1 Presentations 2013 Reliability & Markets Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 6 sessions over 2 days on August 6 - 7, 2013. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through IV) are available below. Session I: Ben Hobbs (Johns Hopkins), Kameshwar Poolla (UC Berkeley) Session II: Ray Zimmerman (Cornell), Hsiao-Dong Chiang (Cornell) Session III: Shmuel Oren (UC Berkeley), Dan Tylavsky (U Arizona), Tom Overbye (U Illinois) Session IV: Lindsay Anderson (Cornell), HyungSeon Oh (Cornell) 2013 R&M Peer Review - Assessing Transmission Investments Under Uncertainty - Ben Hobbs, Johns Hopkins 2013 R&M Peer Review - Coordinated Aggregation of Distributed Energy Resources - Kameshwar Poolla, UC Berkeley

389

NETL: SECA Workshop Proceedings, Peer Reviews, and Annual Reports  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Solid State Energy Conversion Alliance (SECA) SECA Workshop Proceedings and Peer Reviews The proceedings from the all workshops that the SECA program has sponsored are described on this page. In addition, the Peer Review Results are also summarized. Annual Workshop Proceedings Core Technology Workshop Proceedings Peer Review Results 2008 SECA 9th Annual Workshop & Peer Review CD Cover Annual Workshop Proceedings 13th Annual SECA Workshop - Pittsburgh, PA (July 2012) 12th Annual SECA Workshop - Pittsburgh, PA (July 2011) 11th Annual SECA Workshop - Pittsburgh, PA (July 2010) 10th Annual SECA Workshop - Pittsburgh, PA (July 2009) 9th Annual SECA Workshop - Pittsburgh, PA (Aug 2008) 8th Annual SECA Workshop - San Antonio, TX (Aug 2007) 7th Annual SECA Workshop - Philadelphia, PA (Sept 2006)

390

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations are available through individual session links and the agenda is below. Presentations: Day 1: June 7 Morning session | Moderator: Dan Ton, DOE Afternoon sessions | Moderators: Eric Lightner and Merrill Smith, DOE Day 2: June 8 Morning session | Moderator: Merrill Smith, DOE Smart Grid Panel Discussion | Moderator: Lee Krevat, SDG&E First afternoon session | Moderator: Dan Ton, DOE Second afternoon session | Moderator: Eric Lightner, DOE

391

2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included six sessions over 2 days on June 27 - 28, 2013. Presentations are available through the individual session links. The agenda and introduction by Joe Eto, LBNL, are available below. Day 1: June 27 Session I Baselining Studies and Analysis, Bharat Bhargava, EPG Baselining Studies and Analysis, Brett Amidan, PNNL Synchrophasor Standards Support and Development, Ken Martin, EPG Session II Advanced Synchrophasor Metrology, Stan Hadley, ORNL GPS Issue Management, Mark Buckner, ORNL Technology Assessment for Next Generation PMU, Mark Buckner, ORNL Session III Measurement-Based Stability Assessment, Dan Trudnowski, U. Montana

392

2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Reliability & Markets Peer Review Reliability & Markets Peer Review 2012 Reliability & Markets Peer Review The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 11 presentations over 2 days on August 7 - 8, 2012 at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY. Presentations and summaries are available through the links and the agenda is included below. Summaries | Full Presentations Day 1: August 7 Transmission Investment Assessment Under Uncertainty About Fuel Prices, Technology, Renewables Penetration and Market Responses Using a Multi-State Stochastic Model Approach with Recourse Renewable Integration Through Risk-Limiting Dispatch and Distributed Resource Aggregations Development and Testing of New Tools Commercialization of the SuperOPF Framework: Phase 2 Essence of Structure Preserving (ESP) Network Reductions for

393

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. The final agenda and welcome presentation are below. Presentations

394

Visualization & Controls Program Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Visualization & Controls Program Peer Review Visualization & Controls Program Peer Review Visualization & Controls Program Peer Review With mounting evidence suggesting an increased probability that malicious attacks may be launched against energy control systems, there is a critical need to understand specific cyber vulnerabilities and corresponding mitigation strategies. This need is being addressed by SCADA/ Energy Management System (EMS) Cyber Security Assessments conducted at the National SCADA Test Bed (NSTB) facility at INL and at on-site field installations of control systems. Visualization & Controls Program Peer Review More Documents & Publications DOE/OE National SCADA Test Bed Fiscal Year 2009 Work Plan DOE National SCADA Test Bed Program Multi-Year Plan Vulnerability Analysis of Energy Delivery Control Systems - 2011

395

2014 Reliability & Markets Peer Review- Day 1 Presentations  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Transmission Reliability R&D Reliability & Markets Peer Review included 6 sessions over 2 days on August 5 - 6, 2014. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through IV) are available here.

396

2014 Load as a Resource Program Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Transmission Reliability R&D Load as a Resource (LaaR) Program peer review included 2 roundtable discussions and 4 presentations on September 16, 2014 at Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. Agenda and presentations are available.

397

2014 Advanced Grid Modeling Peer Review Presentations - Day One...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

- Day One Afternoon Session The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a peer review of the Advanced Grid Modeling Program on June 17-18, 2014 in...

398

ForPeerReview Persuasive communication and advertising efficacy for  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ForPeerReview Persuasive communication and advertising efficacy for public health policy Research Article Keywords: Persuasive communication, Pragmatics, Social advertising, Health communication and preventive advertising. http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/commresearch Communication Researchhalshs-00410054

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

399

2014 SunShot Initiative Peer Review Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

In May 2014, the SunShot Initiative held a peer review to receive unbiased expertise from industry, government agencies, nonprofit organizations, utilities, and consultants on how each program ...

400

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

project presentations from the first poster session on Day 1, chaired by DOE's Mark Johnson, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Metrics for Storage and Pre-Standards Analyses -...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

2014 Energy Storage Peer Review- September 17-19  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The 2014 Energy Storage Peer Review will be held September 17-19, 2014, in Washington, DC. The event is free but registration is required. The preliminary agenda is available.

402

ORISE: Making a Difference in Scientific Peer Review  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

How ORISE is Making a Difference in Scientific Peer Review Scientific microscope The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) is helping the U.S. Department of Energy...

403

Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 14, 2010 FY10-42 OAK RIDGE, Tenn.-Oak Ridge Associated Universities has appointed...

404

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. The final agenda and welcome presentation are below. Presentations

405

Proposal Peer Review Nondisclosure Agreement and Conflict of Interest Avoidance In the performance of peer review of proposals submitted to NASA, I may have access to  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

2007 Proposal Peer Review Nondisclosure Agreement and Conflict of Interest Avoidance In the performance of peer review of proposals submitted to NASA, I may have access to or be furnished reviewers, non-NASA support personnel, or NASA personnel outside the meetings of any designated peer review

Kalas, Paul G.

406

2012 Load as a Resource Program Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Load as a Resource Program Peer Review Load as a Resource Program Peer Review 2012 Load as a Resource Program Peer Review The Transmission Reliability R&D Load as a Resource (LAAR) Program peer review included 8 presentations on September 20, 2012 at Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. Agenda and presentations are below. 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Agenda 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Frequency Response Demand - Jeff Dagle, PNNL 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Frequency Responsive Load Evaluation and Benefits - Isabelle Snyder, ORNL 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Load as a Regulation Resource, Phase 2 - Sila Kiliccote, LBNL 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Scoping Study on Industrial Regulation - Nasr Alkadi, ORNL 2012 LAAR Program Peer Review - Integration and Extension of Direct Load Management of Smart Loads - Anna Scaglioni, UC Davis

407

Canadian radiation oncologists opinions regarding peer review: A national survey  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

AbstractPurpose To determine Canadian radiation oncologists (ROs) views regarding the benefits, workload implications, and legal liability of the peer review quality assurance (QA) process. Methods and materials A 26-item anonymous survey was electronically distributed to all current practicing \\{ROs\\} in Canada through the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists membership to obtain their opinions regarding peer review. Results The survey was completed by 145 (36%) of 404 ROs. Most (82%) reported their practice is moderately or very busy and more than two-thirds (69%) felt stressed by their workload. A peer review process is standard at 92% of respondents institutions. The majority reported this consists of weekly meetings where \\{ROs\\} and other health care providers convene to review radiation treatment plans; some have tumor site-specific rounds while others have 1 meeting for all sites. Nearly all (97%) found this type of QA is beneficial for review of radical plans and 71% found it is beneficial for palliative plans. Incorporating peer review into their current work schedule for all sites was deemed by 37% of respondents to be not or slightly difficult, while 40% found it moderately difficult and 22% very or extremely difficult. The majority (91%) reported that creating a work code to document QA meetings would be helpful and 69% stated that extra resources such as scheduling protected time, designating other health care providers QA coordinators, and increasing overall RO manpower are needed to implement effective peer review. Over half (52%) felt documenting QA meeting minutes would increase legal liability. Conclusions The majority of \\{ROs\\} who responded found that peer review is beneficial and participate in peer review for at least some of the tumor sites they treat. However, most stated that extra resources are required to effectively implement QA for all tumor sites in their current schedule.

Sarah Nicole Hamilton; Haroon Hasan; Christina Parsons; Scott Tyldesley; A. Fuchsia Howard; Mary Anne Bobinski; Karen Goddard

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

408

Version 1.0 Peer Review Framework: Accessing information about Research Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Version 1.0 June 2014 Peer Review Framework: Accessing information about Research Council on funding. 1.3 Proposals are assessed by a process known as Peer Review which usually involves a two of successful Proposals for funding. 1.4 The Peer Review Framework is designed to explain: i. How the Peer

Crowther, Paul

409

How Peer Review Teams will work Cesnik, Catherine M 0 'Darren.Mollot@HQ.DOE.GOV'  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Marcia, How Peer Review Teams will work I Cesnik, Catherine M 0 'Darren.Mollot@HQ.DOE.GOV' Cc: ~Mc, plume, etc.) already include groups of peers, that their numbers could be considered peer reviewed. Thus that would eliminate the need for duplicate subteams to peer review each subteam. That would leave Bill Rees

Fleskes, Joe

410

Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project Transportation - September 2000 Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project Transportation - September 2000 September 2000 Transportation Emergency Management Review of the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) and National Transportation Program (NTP)/Transportation Compliance Evaluation/Assistance Program (TCEAP) The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Emergency Management Oversight, within the Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance, conducted a transportation emergency management review of the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) and National Transportation Program (NTP)/Transportation Compliance Evaluation/Assistance Program (TCEAP) in September 2000.

411

Department of Teaching, Learning and Culture Process for Post-Tenure Peer Review The Department has an elected faculty evaluation committee that does peer reviews of all  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Department of Teaching, Learning and Culture Process for Post-Tenure Peer Review The Department has an elected faculty evaluation committee that does peer reviews of all tenure-line faculty annual evaluation and Human Development Guidelines approved on August 2, 2011, the committee will now provide peer review

Boas, Harold P.

412

Improving peer review with ACORN : Ant Colony Optimization algorithm for Reviewer's Network.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??Peer review, our current system for determining which papers to accept and which to reject by journals and conferences, has limitations that impair the quality (more)

Flynn, Mark

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

413

Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Operations  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Operations Office - December 2010 Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Operations Office - December 2010 December 2010 Specific Administrative Controls Review with the Office of Environmental Management at DOE-Richland Operations Office The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, participated in the Office of Environmental Management Office of Standards and Quality Assurance, EM-23, review of Specific Administrative Controls (SAC) at the Hanford Site. The EM-23 review included selected programs at the Hanford Site that are under the auspices of the DOE Richland Operations Office. Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Operations

414

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2011 September 2011 Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The purpose of this review was to assess the effectiveness of the integrated safety management system (ISMS) established and implemented by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2011 More Documents & Publications Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Technical Appendices, Volume II, December 2004 Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,

415

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

consensus standards, U.S. Department of Energy orders and standards, and National Fire Protection Association standards and requirements. Independent Oversight Review, Los...

416

Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

3Q CY2005 (PDF), Facility Representative Program Performance Indicators Quarterly Report Independent Oversight Review, Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site - March 2000...

417

SunShot Grand Challenge Summit and Peer Review 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The 2014 SunShot Grand Challenge Summit and Peer Review brought together more than 800 members of the solar community to review the progress made toward the SunShot goal and discuss the challenges ahead to make solar energy more affordable and widespread across America. Download the Summit conference presentations here.

418

Independent Oversight Special Review, Headquarters - August 2008 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Oversight Special Review, Headquarters - August 2008 Independent Oversight Special Review, Headquarters - August 2008 Independent Oversight Special Review, Headquarters - August 2008 August 2008 Review of Construction Safety and Health Programs This special review of construction safety was performed by the Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), to provide feedback to DOE line management and contractors on the effectiveness of line organizations at DOE sites in implementing construction safety requirements. This special review is based on data collected over the past three years (covering the timeframe from late 2005 to early 2008) during scheduled inspections performed by Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations, at the

419

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Secure Communications Secure Communications Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Secure Communications National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Secure Communications are below. CEDS 2010 Peer Review - Cryptographic Trust Management - Mark Hadley,

420

2010 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review 2010 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review The Transmission Reliability research area focuses on two key areas: 1) Real-Time Grid Reliability Management and 2) Reliability and Markets. The first area develops monitoring and analysis tools that process synchrophasor data to enable real-time assessment of grid status and stability margins, with the goal of improving power system reliability and visibility through wide-area measurement and control. It is developing advanced technologies and tools to help create a resilient electric transmission system that can better detect disturbances, accommodate a variety of generation sources, and automatically reconfigure the grid to prevent widespread outages and/or rebalance the system. The second area

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

VISUALIZATION & CONTROLS PEER REVIEW PRESENTATIONS | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

VISUALIZATION & CONTROLS PEER REVIEW PRESENTATIONS VISUALIZATION & CONTROLS PEER REVIEW PRESENTATIONS VISUALIZATION & CONTROLS PEER REVIEW PRESENTATIONS PROGRAM AGENDA Marriott Crystal City at Reagan National Airport 1999 Jefferson Davis Highway Arlington, Virginia 22202 October 18, 2006 7:30 - 8:30 a.m. Continental Breakfast Times CONTROL SYSTEMS CONTROL SYSTEMS SECURITY 8:30 - 8:45 Introduction - Phil Overholt philip.overholt@hq.doe.gov Introduction - Hank Kenchington henry.kenchington@hq.doe.gov 8:45 - 9:15 Overview of Reliability and Markets Bob Thomas, PSERC/Cornell Univ. rjt1@cornell.edu Cyber Security Assessments of Control Systems in the Energy Sector Bob Hill, INL robert.hill@inl.gov 9:15 - 9:45 Market Monitoring Tools Bernard Lesieutre, LBNL bclesieutre@lbnl.gov Cyber Security Assessments of Inter Control Center Communications Protocol Implementations

422

Superconductivity for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review Final  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review Final Report Superconductivity for Electric Systems: 2008 Annual Peer Review Final Report The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability's High Temperature Superconductivity (HTS) for Electric Systems Program's specific mission is to work in partnership with industry to develop HTS wire and perform other research and development activities leading to the commercialization of HTS-based electric power applications by U.S. companies. This technology contributes to several key performance improvements of the grid. It enhances reliability by increasing capacity, which relieves congestion and helps prevent outages. Efficiency is improved as a result of the reduction of loss during operation which both conserves

423

Independent Oversight Targeted Review, Sandia National Laboratories -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Targeted Review, Sandia National Laboratories Targeted Review, Sandia National Laboratories - November 2013 Independent Oversight Targeted Review, Sandia National Laboratories - November 2013 December 2013 Targeted Review of Activity-Level Implementation of Radiological Controls at Sandia National Laboratories This report documents the results of an independent oversight targeted review of radiological protection program activity-level implementation for Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), Technical Area V facilities. SNL is managed by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, under contract to the Department of Energy (DOE) and is overseen by the National Nuclear Security Administration and its Sandia Field Office. This targeted review was performed at SNL September 23-27,

424

The Role of Peer Review Panels in High Speed Rail Studies  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The Role of Peer Review Panels in High Speed Rail Studies Frank S. Koppelman Prof. Emeritus of Civil and Environmental Engineering Northwestern University #12;Peer Review · Widely used in all areas of science, technology and engineering. · Long history of peer reviews for ­ Paper review ­ Solicited

Bustamante, Fabián E.

425

Peer Review of the ESR Health Risk Assessment on Dung Beetles 31 October 2013  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review of the ESR Health Risk Assessment on Dung Beetles 31 October 2013 General In general terms, the confidential peer reviewers (drawn from universities and CRIs) considered the ESR public findings of the ESR review (pg 94 of their risk assessment) were not supported by the peer reviewers

Sun, Jing

426

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Software Engineering Institute Software Engineering Institute Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Software Engineering Institute National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations from Carnegie Mellon University's Software Engineering

427

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Visualization and Modeling Visualization and Modeling Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Visualization and Modeling National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Visualization and Modeling are below.

428

Developing Critical Thinking Skills in an Introductory Calculus-Based Physics Class with the Aid of Peer Review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ClasswiththeAidofPeerReview KoranaBurke* PhysicsClass withtheAidofPeerReview ByKoranaBurke Athroughtheuse ofpeerreviewandselfreflection. The

Burke, Korana

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

429

2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Presentations 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included six sessions over 2 days on June 27 - 28, 2013. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through IV) are available below. Session I: Bharat Bhargava (EPG), Brett Amidan (PNNL), Ken Martin (EPG) Session II: Mark Buckner (ORNL) Session III: Dan Trudnowski (U Montana), Ning Zhou (PNNL) Session IV: Frank Tuffner (PNNL), Bernie Lesieutre (U Wisconsin), Harold Kirkham (PNNL), YC Zhang (NREL) 2013 TR Review - Eastern Interconnection Phase Angle Base Lining Study - Bharat Bhargava, EPG 2013 TR Review - Baselining Studies and Analysis - Brett Amidan, PNNL 2013 TR Review - Synchrophasor Standards Development and Support - Ken Martin, EPG

430

2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Presentations 2013 Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review - Day 1 Presentations The Transmission Reliability Program Peer Review included six sessions over 2 days on June 27 - 28, 2013. Presentations from Day 1 (Sessions I through IV) are available below. Session I: Bharat Bhargava (EPG), Brett Amidan (PNNL), Ken Martin (EPG) Session II: Mark Buckner (ORNL) Session III: Dan Trudnowski (U Montana), Ning Zhou (PNNL) Session IV: Frank Tuffner (PNNL), Bernie Lesieutre (U Wisconsin), Harold Kirkham (PNNL), YC Zhang (NREL) 2013 TR Review - Eastern Interconnection Phase Angle Base Lining Study - Bharat Bhargava, EPG 2013 TR Review - Baselining Studies and Analysis - Brett Amidan, PNNL 2013 TR Review - Synchrophasor Standards Development and Support - Ken Martin, EPG

431

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day One of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Program Overview - Eric Lightner, DOE_0.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - University of HI Renewable and Distributed Systems - Jay Griffen, Univ. of HI.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Demonstration of a Coordinated and Integrated System - Dennis Summer, Fort Collins_0.pdf

432

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day Three of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Smart Charger Technology Development, Frank Tuffner, PNNL.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Vehicle to Grid Demonstration - Willett Kempton, U. Delaware.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Estimating and Mitigating Cascading Failure Risk - Paul Hines, U. Vermont.pdf

433

HVAC, Water Heater and Appliance R&D - 2014 BTO Peer Review ...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

HVAC, Water Heater and Appliance R&D - 2014 BTO Peer Review HVAC, Water Heater and Appliance R&D - 2014 BTO Peer Review Presenter: Tony Bouza, U.S. Department of Energy This...

434

2014 Advanced Grid Modeling Peer Review Presentations- Day One Morning Session  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a peer review of the Advanced Grid Modeling Program on June 17-18, 2014 in Alexandria, VA. This page lists the morning presentations from Day One of the Peer Review.

435

2014 Advanced Grid Modeling Peer Review Presentations- Day Two Afternoon Session  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a peer review of the Advanced Grid Modeling Program on June 17-18, 2014 in Alexandria, VA. This page lists the afternoon presentations from Day Two of the Peer Review.

436

2014 Advanced Grid Modeling Peer Review Presentations- Day Two Morning Session  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a peer review of the Advanced Grid Modeling Program on June 17-18, 2014 in Alexandria, VA. This page lists the morning presentations from Day Two of the Peer Review.

437

2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report Posted  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The report summarizes the comments of expert peer reviewers at the 2013 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, which was held May 1317, 2013, in Arlington, Virginia.

438

Second Peer Review for New MGI Valves for NSTX-U  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Second Peer Review for New MGI Valves for NSTX-U (Update on Valve Tes · Characterize this valve upto 1000 Torr.L · Describe results in Peer Review (Jan, 2014

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

439

Attend AMO Program Peer Review May 6 and 7 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Attend AMO Program Peer Review May 6 and 7 Attend AMO Program Peer Review May 6 and 7 April 28, 2014 - 1:09pm Addthis DOE's Advanced Manufacturing Office (AMO) will be conducting a...

440

The efficacy of peer review in a university-level ESL writing class.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??Currently, there is a great debate concerning whether peer review is an effective activity in the university-level English-as-a-Second-Language writing classroom. Peer review offers the unique (more)

Brathwaite, Sara Strickland

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Advanced Grid Modeling Program Peer Review June 17-18, 2014 ...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Advanced Grid Modeling Program Peer Review June 17-18, 2014 Advanced Grid Modeling Program Peer Review June 17-18, 2014 May 28, 2014 - 4:36pm Addthis The Office of Electricity...

442

Letter from the AMO Director on the AMO Peer Review, May 6-7...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Letter from the AMO Director on the AMO Peer Review, May 6-7, 2014 Letter from the AMO Director on the AMO Peer Review, May 6-7, 2014 Dear Stakeholders, In May 2014, the Advanced...

443

Final Report of theIgneous Consequences Peer Review Panel | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Final Report of theIgneous Consequences Peer Review Panel Final Report of theIgneous Consequences Peer Review Panel A report for the DOE on the Yucca Mountain Project. Final Report...

444

Forthcoming Projects Peer Review Panel (PPRP) meeting The next meeting of the Projects Peer Review Panel (PPRP) will take place in Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Forthcoming Projects Peer Review Panel (PPRP) meeting The next meeting of the Projects Peer Review September 2012, Polaris House, Swindon. The Panel will be reviewing 3 project proposals. Members.Aziz@stfc.ac.uk if they are likely to attend the open sessions. The proposals being reviewed are as follows: 19th September & 20th

445

Forthcoming Projects Peer Review Panel (PPRP) meeting The next meeting of the Projects Peer Review Panel (PPRP) will take place at Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Forthcoming Projects Peer Review Panel (PPRP) meeting The next meeting of the Projects Peer Review 2012 The Panel will be reviewing 2 project proposals and 15 PRD applications. Due to the large number of PRD applications being reviewed there will be no open presentations for PRDs. Members of the science

446

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations- Day 2 Smart Grid Panel Discussion  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentations from the Smart Grid panel discussion during Day 2 of the 2012 Smart Grid R&D Peer Review

447

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2011 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation by Sunita Satyapal at the 2011 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on May 9, 2011.

448

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient Product Procurement Portfolio  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Document details the peer review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient Product Procurement portfolio.

449

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2014 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation by Sunita Satyapal at the 2014 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting plenary session on June 16, 2014.

450

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2013 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation by Sunita Satyapal at the 2013 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting plenary session on May 13, 2013.

451

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2012 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation by Sunita Satyapal at the 2012 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting plenary session on May 14, 2012.

452

Peer Reviewed: What Future for Carbon Capture and Sequestration?  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Peer Reviewed: What Future for Carbon Capture and Sequestration? ... A New Porous Material to Enhance the Kinetics of Clathrate Process: Application to Precombustion Carbon Dioxide Capture ... A New Porous Material to Enhance the Kinetics of Clathrate Process: Application to Precombustion Carbon Dioxide Capture ...

Howard J. Herzog

2001-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

453

Denis White ~ Publications PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL ARTICLES  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Denis White ~ Publications PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL ARTICLES: (Some PDF files are provided with permission of the American Congress on Surveying and Mapping and Taylor and Francis) Hopton ME, White D. 2012. A simplified ecological footprint at a regional scale. Journal of Environmental Management 111:279-286. White D

Jenny, Bernhard

454

Supporting scientific writing and evaluation in a conceptual physics course with Calibrated Peer Review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

students' writing can be difficult in large classes. With the web-based Calibrated Peer Review* (CPR and compared students' peer reviews with expert evaluations. Students' scores on their essays correlate with implementing CPR assignments. *Calibrated Peer Review, http://cpr.molsci.ucla.edu/ Keywords: conceptual physics

Goldberg, Fred M.

455

Draft for Peer Review and Field Testing 6-20-2009  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Draft for Peer Review and Field Testing 6-20-2009 Wetlands Regulatory Assistance Program DRAFT Islands Region U.S. Army Corps of Engineers #12;Draft for Peer Review and Field Testing 6-20-2009 Abstract;Draft for Peer Review and Field Testing 6-20-2009 Contents Preface

US Army Corps of Engineers

456

CONSULTATION RESPONSE `Wellcome Trust response to S&T Committee inquiry on peer review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

CONSULTATION RESPONSE `Wellcome Trust response to S&T Committee inquiry on peer review March 2011 Page 1 of 4 Science and Technology Committee: Inquiry on Peer Review Response by the Wellcome Trust March 2011 Summary 1. Peer review ensures that scientific findings and research funding proposals

Rambaut, Andrew

457

Designing for the Future: The New Open Suite of Programs and Peer Review Process  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Designing for the Future: The New Open Suite of Programs and Peer Review Process Questions and Answers 1 Rationale 1. If the changes to the Open Suite of Programs and peer review process are successful, what will CIHR have achieved? Our goal in designing the new Open Suite of Programs and peer review

Charette, André

458

Final External Peer Review Report for Calcasieu River and Pass, Louisiana  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Final External Peer Review Report for Calcasieu River and Pass, Louisiana Dredged Material EXTERNAL PEER REVIEW REPORT for Calcasieu River and Pass, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan. #12;Calcasieu River and Pass, Louisiana DMMP/SEIS ii Battelle Final External Peer Review Report August

US Army Corps of Engineers

459

Some Thoughts On Peer Review In The Global Internet Context Narayanan Komerath  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Some Thoughts On Peer Review In The Global Internet Context Narayanan Komerath Daniel Guggenheim in capturing knowledge. The implications of internet based peer review are considered in suggesting a model for peer review and cross-disciplinary innovation, with some preliminary empirical observations on needed

460

Rules for Peer Review of Cycle 13 Chandra Proposals 10 May 2011  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Rules for Peer Review of Cycle 13 Chandra Proposals 10 May 2011 Contents 1 Purpose and Documents 1 and Information on Proposals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3 Peer Review 3 3.1 Panels for peer review of scientific proposals for use of the Chandra X-ray Observatory. Proposals are solicited

California at Santa Cruz, University of

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Identifying Thesis and Conclusion Statements in Student Essays to Scaffold Peer Review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Identifying Thesis and Conclusion Statements in Student Essays to Scaffold Peer Review Mohammad H, Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh {mhf11, ashley, schunn, dlitman}@pitt.edu Abstract. Peer-reviewing is a recommended instructional technique to encourage good writing. Peer reviewers, however, may fail to identify

Litman, Diane J.

462

Engineering Peer Review June 5-7, 2001 1 FUSION IGNITION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Engineering Peer Review June 5-7, 2001 1 FUSION IGNITION RESEARCH EXPERIMENT (FIRE) Machine Configuration Tom Brown (PPPL) June 5 ­ 7 , 2001 #12;Engineering Peer Review June 5-7, 2001 2 FIRE Configuration approach. Summary. #12;Engineering Peer Review June 5-7, 2001 3 FIRE Configuration Features Double null

463

Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom Abstract Background: Pre-publication peer review of manuscripts should prepare better manuscripts may help peer reviewers in assessing them. We examined journals' instructions

464

Manuscript May 2014 Revising voice and identity through internet-mediated, intercultural peer review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

and after a guided peer review process involving U.S. and French students working in English. Students). This research suggests that the intercultural peer review is a strong tool for helping students to develop identities as writers and to learn how to construct appropriate voice. Keywords: peer review; voice; second

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

465

Women and Peer Review An audit of theWellcomeTrust's  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Women and Peer Review An audit of theWellcomeTrust's decision-making on grants #12;The attributable to them. P R I S M UNIT FOR POLICY RESEARCH IN SCIENCE AND MEDICINE #12;WomenandPeerReview An audit of the Wellcome Trust's decision-making on grants PRISM Report No. 8 #12;WOMEN AND PEER REVIEW

Rambaut, Andrew

466

Disagreement for control of rational cheating in peer review: a simulation  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Disagreement for control of rational cheating in peer review: a simulation (Extended Abstract Understanding the peer review process could help research and shed light on mechanisms that underlie crowdsourcing. We present an agent-based model of peer review built on three entities - the paper, the scientist

Grimaldo, Francisco

467

Athletics Certification Peer-Review Team Report University of Wisconsin, Madison  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Athletics Certification Peer-Review Team Report University of Wisconsin, Madison Evaluation. The self-study process involved broad faculty and campus input. The peer-review team was impressed. Additional Peer-Review Team Issues None. C. Opportunities for Enhancement University of Wisconsin, Madison

Sheridan, Jennifer

468

2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report Posted  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program has posted the 2014 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report, which summarizes the comments of expert peer reviewers at the 2014 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR) held June 1620, 2014, in Washington, D.C.

469

NTP brief on BPA receives mixed peer review  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

NTP brief on BPA receives mixed peer review ... Less than 2 months after the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) released its much-awaited draft brief on the human-health risks of bisphenol A (BPA), the agencys board of scientific advisers gave the report a somewhat mixed review. ... In a meeting held on June 11, the experts agreed with NTPs concern over some of BPAs human-health impacts. ...

Rhitu Chatterjee

2008-07-17T23:59:59.000Z

470

Peer review of medical practices: missed opportunities to learn  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Appropriately conducted peer review of medical practices provides the greatest opportunity for health care professionals to learn from their mistakes and improve the quality and safety of health care. But in practice, peer review has not been an effective learning tool because it is subjective and irreproducible. Physicians reviewing the same cases disagree over the cause(s) of adverse outcomes and the quality and appropriateness of care, and agreement is not improved by training, use of objective review criteria, or having the reviewers discuss the cases. The underlying reason is a general lack of understanding and an oversimplified view of the causes of medical errors in complex, high-risk organization and a preoccupation with attributing medical errors to particular individuals. This approach leads to judgments, not understanding, and creates a culture of blame that stops learning and undermines the potential for improvement. For peer review to have an impact on the quality of care and patient safety, it must be standardized to remove cognitive biases and subjectivity from the process.

Nicholas Kadar

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

471

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

and Peer Evaluation Report to someone by E-mail and Peer Evaluation Report to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on AddThis.com... Publications Program Publications Roadmaps Program Plans Reports to Congress Annual Progress Reports

472

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 September 2013 Review of the Fire Protection Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of the fire protection program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The review was performed June 10-21, 2013, by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, which is within the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security. The review was one part of a targeted assessment of fire protection at nuclear facilities across the DOE complex, including National Nuclear Security Administration sites. The purpose of the Independent Oversight targeted assessment was to

473

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 September 2013 Review of the Fire Protection Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of the fire protection program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The review was performed June 10-21, 2013, by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, which is within the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security. The review was one part of a targeted assessment of fire protection at nuclear facilities across the DOE complex, including National Nuclear Security Administration sites. The purpose of the Independent Oversight targeted assessment was to

474

BETO Releases 2013 Peer Review Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

In the spring and summer of 2013, the Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) implemented a comprehensive external review of its research, development, and demonstration portfolio.

475

SUPPLEMENTAL COLUMBIA RIVER PROTECTION ACTIVITIES AT THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY HANFORD SITE: 2006 TECHNICAL PEER REVIEW  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Prompted by a $10 million Congressional allocation to identify supplemental actions to protect the Columbia River from groundwater contamination beneath the Hanford Reservation, the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management (EM) Office of Clean-up Technology identified twenty-three potential technical projects and then down-selected ten of these for further evaluation. An independent expert peer review was conducted for the ten down-selected proposals. The review panel consisted of twenty-three recognized subject matter experts that broadly represented academia, industry, and federal laboratories. Of the initial ten proposals reviewed, one was given unconditional support, six were given conditional support, and three were not supported as proposed. Three additional proposals were then submitted by DOE for review--these proposals were structured, in part, to respond to the initial round of technical peer review comments. Peer reviews of these additional proposals provided conditional support. For those proposals that received conditional support, DOE requested specific implementation and work plans and assessed whether the plans adequately addressed the technical conditions identified by the review panel. The final list of technology proposals receiving support, or conditional support, primarily focused on understanding and reducing the potential impacts of uranium, chromium, and strontium from facilities adjacent to the Columbia River, with a secondary focus on understanding and limiting the future Columbia River impacts from the large carbon tetrachloride groundwater plume underlying and downgradient of the Hanford Central Plateau facilities. The results and recommendations of the peer reviews informed the final DOE project selections and supported implementation of the selected projects to protect the Columbia River and address groundwater contamination at Hanford.

Looney, B; Dawn Kaback; Gene Leboeuf; Jason Mulvihill-Kuntz; Lynn Lefkoff

2006-12-20T23:59:59.000Z

476

FINAL REPORT WASTE PACKAGE MATERIALS PERFORMANCE PEER REVIEW PANEL  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

REPORT REPORT WASTE PACKAGE MATERIALS PERFORMANCE PEER REVIEW PANEL FEBRUARY 28, 2002 This document is not an official copy and is for informational purposes only. Signature Page Preface Executive Summary TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Organization of the Peer Review 1.2 Objectives of the Review 1.3 Content of the Final Report 2. MAIN FINDINGS 2.1 Perspective 2.2 Overall Findings 2.3 Corrosion Degradation Modes 2.4 Higher or Lower Temperature Operating Modes 2.5 Long-Term Uniform Corrosion of Passive Metal 2.6 Alloy Specification and Comparison 2.7 Technical Issues to be Resolved 2.8 Organizational-Managerial Issues 3. SUMMARY OF DEGRADATION MODES AND CONTRIBUTING FACTORS 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Repository Conditions: Overview of Time, Temperature, Environment

477

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Review, Lawrence Livermore National Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - December 2009 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - December 2009 December 2009 Review of Nuclear Safety at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed a review of nuclear safety programs at the DOE Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) from October through November 2009. The review was performed by the HSS Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Evaluations. LLNL has made significant progress in establishing and implementing comprehensive programs to effectively manage nuclear safety. LLNL has devoted considerable management attention and resources to enhance nuclear

478

Independent Oversight Focused Program Review, Argonne National  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Focused Program Review, Argonne National Focused Program Review, Argonne National Laboratory-West - May 2001 Independent Oversight Focused Program Review, Argonne National Laboratory-West - May 2001 May 2001 Focused Program Review at Argonne National Laboratory-West The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Emergency Management Oversight, within the Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance, conducted a focused review of the emergency management program at Argonne National Laboratory-West (ANL-W) in May 2001. There were two primary objectives for this review: to evaluate the extent to which the emergency planning hazards assessment (EPHA) document serves as an effective foundation for the ANL-W emergency management program, and to determine whether the necessary interfaces have been established among

479

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 1 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 1 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the first session of Day 3, chaired by Sandia's Dan Borneo, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-OE FY12 Electrical Energy Storage Demonstration Projects - Dan Borneo, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - State & Federal Energy Storage Technology Advancement Partnership - Todd Olinsky-Paul, CESA ESS 2012 Peer Review - Life Cycle Testing and Evaluation of Energy Storage Devices - Summer Ferreira, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Energy Storage Test Pad - David Rose, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Protocol for Measuring and Expressing Performance

480

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 1 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 1 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the first session of Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Tony Martino, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - CAES Geo Performance for Natural Gas and Salt Reservoirs and TMH Response of GSFs - Payton Gardner, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Thermoelectrochemical Energy Storage - Nick Hudak, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Component Research for Redox Flow Batteries - Tom Zawodzinski, ORNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Nitrogen-Oxygen Battery for Large Scale Energy Storage - Frank Delnick, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Sodium-based Battery Development - Dave Ingersoll,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "independent peer review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Morning Presentations Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day One Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day One of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Program Overview - Eric Lightner, DOE_0.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - University of HI Renewable and Distributed Systems - Jay Griffen, Univ. of HI.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Demonstration of a Coordinated and Integrated System - Dennis Summer, Fort Collins_0.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Integrated & Automated DG Technologies Demo - Roger

482

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 2 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 2 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the second session of Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Ross Guttromson, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Na-ion Intercalation Electrodes for Na-ion Battery - Jun Liu, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Unique Li-ion Batteries for Utility Applications - Daiwon Choi, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Carbon Enhanced VRLA Batteries - David Enos, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Improved Properties of Nanocomposites for Flywheel Applications - Tim Boyle, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Magnetic Composites for Flywheel Energy Storage -

483

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 2 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Day 3, Day 3, Session 2 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 2 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the second session of Day 3, chaired by PNNL's Landis Kannberg, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Advanced Membranes for VRFB - Cy Fujimoto, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Advanced Materials for Flow Batteries - Travis Anderson, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Flow Battery Modeling - Mario Martinez, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - New Generation Redox Flow Battery Prototype Development - Vincent Sprenkle, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - New Generation Aqueous Base Redox Flow Battery

484

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Afternoon Presentations | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Afternoon Presentations Afternoon Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Afternoon Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day Two of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Intelligent Power Infrastructure Consortium - Deepak Divan, Georgia Institute of Technology.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - HI Sustainable Energy Project, Part 1 - Jennifer Stinebaugh, SNL.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - HI Sustainable Energy Project, Part 2 - Ben Kroposki, NREL.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Marin County Renewables, David Cohen, Infotility.pdf

485

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Morning Presentations | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Morning Presentations Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Two Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day Two of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Borrego Springs Microgrid - Tom Bialek, SDG&E.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - CERTS Microgrid Demonstration - Craig Gee, Chevron.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Texas Microgrids for Colonias and Renewable Microgrid STEM Education - Dean Schneider, TCAT.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - CERTS Microgrid Test Bed - Joe Eto, LBNL.pdf

486

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 1 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 3, Session 1 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the first session of Day 3, chaired by Sandia's Dan Borneo, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-OE FY12 Electrical Energy Storage Demonstration Projects - Dan Borneo, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - State & Federal Energy Storage Technology Advancement Partnership - Todd Olinsky-Paul, CESA ESS 2012 Peer Review - Life Cycle Testing and Evaluation of Energy Storage Devices - Summer Ferreira, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Energy Storage Test Pad - David Rose, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Protocol for Measuring and Expressing Performance

487

2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Three Morning Presentations Three Morning Presentations 2010 Smart Grid Peer Review Day Three Morning Presentations The U.S. Department of Energy's Smart Grid Program conducted the 2010 Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 in Golden, CO. The forum provides an opportunity to learn about the latest innovations and integration activities, and the agenda reflected exciting advancements in the field of smart grid technology. The morning presentations from Day Three of the Peer Review are below: SG 2010 Peer Review - Smart Charger Technology Development, Frank Tuffner, PNNL.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Vehicle to Grid Demonstration - Willett Kempton, U. Delaware.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - Estimating and Mitigating Cascading Failure Risk - Paul Hines, U. Vermont.pdf SG 2010 Peer Review - GridWise Architecture - Ronald Melton, PNNL.pdf

488

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 2 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2, 2, Session 2 Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Day 2, Session 2 The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 - 28, 2012. The 3-day conference included 9 sessions plus two poster sessions. Presentations from the second session of Day 2, chaired by Sandia's Ross Guttromson, are below. ESS 2012 Peer Review - Na-ion Intercalation Electrodes for Na-ion Battery - Jun Liu, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Unique Li-ion Batteries for Utility Applications - Daiwon Choi, PNNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Carbon Enhanced VRLA Batteries - David Enos, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Improved Properties of Nanocomposites for Flywheel Applications - Tim Boyle, SNL ESS 2012 Peer Review - Magnetic Composites for Flywheel Energy Storage -

489

Independent Oversight Review, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Pacific Northwest National Laboratory - September 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory - September 2013 September 2013 Review of the Fire Protection Program at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and the Fire Suppression System at the Radiochemical Processing Laboratory. This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of the fire protection program at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) and the fire suppression system at the Radiochemical Processing Laboratory. The review was performed March 18-29, 2013, by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, which is within the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security. The review was performed as one part of an ongoing targeted

490

WWHEN COMPETITION IS PUSHED TOO HARD. AN AGENT-BASED MODEL OF STRATEGIC BEHAVIOUR OF REFEREES IN PEER REVIEW  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

IN PEER REVIEW Juan Bautista Cabotà Departament d'Informàtica Universitat de València Avinguda de la 25122 Brescia E-mail: squazzon@eco.unibs.it KEYWORDS Peer review; referees; competition; rational of referees on the quality and efficiency of peer review. We modelled peer review as a process based

Grimaldo, Francisco

491

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Trustworthy Cyber Infrastructure for the Power Grid (TCIPG) Trustworthy Cyber Infrastructure for the Power Grid (TCIPG) Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Trustworthy Cyber Infrastructure for the Power Grid (TCIPG) National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs.

492

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 DOE Energy Storage 8 DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) PEER Review FY08 DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Sandia is a multi-program laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration, under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000 Mission Mission Develop advanced electricity storage and PE technologies, in partnership with industry, for modernizing and expanding the electric supply. This will improve the quality, reliability, flexibility and cost effectiveness of the existing system. Help create an energy storage industry Develop advanced power electronics for the grid of the future

493

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Vulnerability and Instrusion Detection are below.

494

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Vulnerability and Intrusion Detection National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Vulnerability and Instrusion Detection are below.

495

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Best Practices/Standards Development Best Practices/Standards Development Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Best Practices/Standards Development National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Best Practices/Standards Development are below.

496

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 DOE Energy Storage Program 7 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review FY07 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Mission Mission Develop advanced electricity storage and PE technologies, in partnership with industry, for modernizing and expanding the electric supply. This will improve the quality, reliability, flexibility and cost effectiveness of the existing system. Help create an energy storage industry Make energy storage ubiquitous ESS Program Makeup ESS Program Makeup ESS Base Program - CEC/DOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - NYSERDA/DOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - BPA ETO based STATCOM Project - ETO Development Project - Boeing Superconducting Flywheel - ACONF Coast Guard Project - Iowa Stored Energy Project - Electrolyte Research

497

Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Practice Design/Configuration Practice Design/Configuration Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Best Practice Design/Configuration National lab researchers, industry partners, and academia from the Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems Program in the DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held a 2-day public peer review to examine more than 30 DOE-supported or cost-shared projects designed to enhance the security and reliability of the nation's energy delivery infrastructure. Industry experts from the Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group provided technical feedback and recommendations to each project to ensure DOE continues to support robust projects that meet industry needs. Presentations on Best Practice Design/Configuration are below.

498

2005 Conference Proceedings: SECA Core Technology Program Peer Review  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Program Peer Review Program Peer Review October 25-26, 2005 Table of Contents Disclaimer Papers and Presentations Materials Modeling & Simulation Balance of Plant Cell Components Breakout Sections Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government or any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

499

Independent Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site - April 2001 Independent Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site - April 2001 April 2001...

500

Independent Oversight Review, Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant - November 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant - November 2013 November 5, 2013 Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of the preparedness of the DOE Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office, contractors at the DOE Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant, and selected non-leased facilities to respond to a severe natural phenomena event (NPE). The review was conducted in July and August 2013 by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, which is within the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations performed this