Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "including clark county" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Clark County - Energy Conservation Code | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Clark County - Energy Conservation Code Clark County - Energy Conservation Code Clark County - Energy Conservation Code < Back Eligibility Commercial Residential Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Program Info State Nevada Program Type Building Energy Code Provider Clark County In September 2010, Clark County adopted Ordinance 3897, implementing the Southern Nevada version of the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code for both residential and commercial buildings located within Clark County. The code was developed by the Southern Nevada Building Officials' International Energy Conservation Committee, comprised of seven municipalities throughout Nevada (including Clark County, Las Vegas, North

2

Commodity Flow Study - Clark County, Nevada, USA  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The United States Department of Energy has designated Clark County, Nevada as an 'Affected Unit of Local Government' due to the potential for impacts by activities associated with the Yucca Mountain High Level Nuclear Waste Repository project. Urban Transit, LLC has led a project team of transportation including experts from the University of Nevada Las Vegas Transportation Research Center to conduct a hazardous materials community flow study along Clark County's rail and truck corridors. In addition, a critical infrastructure analysis has also been carried out in order to assess the potential impacts of transportation within Clark County of high level nuclear waste and spent nuclear fuel to a proposed repository 90 miles away in an adjacent county on the critical infrastructure in Clark County. These studies were designed to obtain information relating to the transportation, identification and routing of hazardous materials through Clark County. Coordinating with the United States Department of Energy, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the U. S. Federal Highway Administration, the Nevada Department of Transportation, and various other stakeholders, these studies and future research will examine the risk factors along the entire transportation corridor within Clark County and provide a context for understanding the additional vulnerability associated with shipping spent fuel through Clark County. (authors)

Conway, S.Ph.D. [Urban Environmental Research LLC, Las Vegas, NV (United States); Navis, I. [AICP Planning Manager, Clark County Nuclear Waste Division, Department of Comprehensive Planning, Las Vegas, NV (United States)

2008-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

3

Pages that link to "Clark County, Idaho" | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Share this page on Facebook icon Twitter icon Pages that link to "Clark County, Idaho" Clark County, Idaho Jump to: navigation, search What links here Page: Clark...

4

EA-1960: Townsite Solar Project Transmission Line, Clark County...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

60: Townsite Solar Project Transmission Line, Clark County, Nevada EA-1960: Townsite Solar Project Transmission Line, Clark County, Nevada SUMMARY The Bureau of Land Management,...

5

EA-1969: Clark Fork River Delta Restoration Project, Bonner County...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EA-1969: Clark Fork River Delta Restoration Project, Bonner County, Idaho EA-1969: Clark Fork River Delta Restoration Project, Bonner County, Idaho Summary Bonneville Power...

6

Clark County REMC- Clark County REMC- Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Clark County REMC provides incentives for residential members to upgrade to more efficient household equipment. Rebates are available for air-source heat pumps, geothermal heat pumps, central air...

7

EA-1960: Townsite Solar Project Transmission Line, Clark County, Nevada |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

60: Townsite Solar Project Transmission Line, Clark County, 60: Townsite Solar Project Transmission Line, Clark County, Nevada EA-1960: Townsite Solar Project Transmission Line, Clark County, Nevada SUMMARY The Bureau of Land Management, with Western Area Power Administration as a cooperating agency, prepared an EA to evaluate potential impacts of a proposal to build and operate a 180-MW photovoltaic facility; a 220, 230, or 500 kV transmission line; and associated facilities in Clark County, Nevada. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD October 28, 2013 EA-1960: Finding of No Significant Impact Townsite Solar Project Transmission Line, Clark County, Nevada June 28, 2013 EA-1960: Final Environmental Assessment Townsite Solar Project Transmission Line, Clark County, Nevada

8

Clark County- Solar and Wind Building Permit Guides  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Clark County, Nevada has established guides for obtaining building permits for wind and solar photovoltaic (PV) systems for both residential and commercial purposes. The guides outline applicable...

9

Geothermal resource area 11, Clark County area development plan  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Geothermal Resource Area 11 includes all of the land in Clark County, Nevada. Within this area are nine geothermal anomalies: Moapa Area, Las Vegas Valley, Black Canyon, Virgin River Narrows, Roger's Springs, Indian Springs, White Rock Springs, Brown's Spring, and Ash Creek Spring. All of the geothermal resources in Clark County have relatively low temperatures. The highest recorded temperature is 145{sup 0}F at Black Canyon. The temperatures of the other resources range from 70 to 90{sup 0}F. Because of the low temperature of the resources and, for the most part, the distance of the resources from any population base, the potential for the development of the resources are considered to be somewhat limited.

Pugsley, M.

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

10

Clark County Develops On-the-Job Weatherization Training Program |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Clark County Develops On-the-Job Weatherization Training Program Clark County Develops On-the-Job Weatherization Training Program Clark County Develops On-the-Job Weatherization Training Program June 9, 2010 - 11:02am Addthis Stephen Graff Former Writer & editor for Energy Empowers, EERE What are the key facts? Southwest Washington Workforce Development Council and the State Board of Community and Technical Colleges received over $200,000 under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to fund the weatherization training at Clark College There was a classic chicken-or-the-egg moment in Washington State's Clark County last year when officials learned about the million dollars heading their way for additional home energy upgrades. What comes first, weatherization training or jobs? "We knew the Stimulus funds were coming...but there was not a huge

11

Athens-Clarke County- Green Business Revolving Loan Fund  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Athens-Clarke County has created a Green Business Revolving Loan Fund for new or existing businesses. Funding is available for implementing eco-friendly products or services into a business or...

12

EA-1693: Transmission Services Facility, Clark County, Washington |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3: Transmission Services Facility, Clark County, Washington 3: Transmission Services Facility, Clark County, Washington EA-1693: Transmission Services Facility, Clark County, Washington Summary DOE will prepare an EA to evaluate the potential environmental impacts from the proposed three-to-five story office building that would be constructed to meet the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Gold standard in energy efficiency and sustainability, near Bonneville Power Administration's (BPA) existing Dittmer Building. BPA website: http://efw.bpa.gov/environmental_services/Document_Library/TSF_Project/ For more information, contact: Stephanie Breeden Environmental Project Manager Bonneville Power Administration - KEC-4 P.O. Box 3621 Portland, Oregon, 97208-3621 Direct telephone number 503-230-5192 Toll-free telephone number 1-800-282-3713

13

PUD No 1 of Clark County | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Clark County Clark County (Redirected from Connect Utilities) Jump to: navigation, search Name PUD No 1 of Clark County Place Washington Utility Id 3660 Utility Location Yes Ownership P NERC Location WECC Operates Generating Plant Yes Activity Generation Yes Activity Transmission Yes Activity Distribution Yes Alt Fuel Vehicle Yes Alt Fuel Vehicle2 Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Commercial First Tier Schedule 34 Commercial Commercial Second Tier Schedule 134 primary point-of-delivery Commercial Commercial Second Tier Schedule 134 secondary point-of-delivery Commercial

14

PUD No 1 of Clark County | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County County Jump to: navigation, search Name PUD No 1 of Clark County Place Washington Utility Id 3660 Utility Location Yes Ownership P NERC Location WECC Operates Generating Plant Yes Activity Generation Yes Activity Transmission Yes Activity Distribution Yes Alt Fuel Vehicle Yes Alt Fuel Vehicle2 Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Commercial First Tier Schedule 34 Commercial Commercial Second Tier Schedule 134 primary point-of-delivery Commercial Commercial Second Tier Schedule 134 secondary point-of-delivery Commercial Industrial Primary Industrial

15

Clark County Rural E M C | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County Rural E M C County Rural E M C Place Indiana Utility Id 22822 Utility Location Yes Ownership C NERC Location RFC NERC RFC Yes ISO MISO Yes Activity Distribution Yes Alt Fuel Vehicle Yes Alt Fuel Vehicle2 Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Residential Time of Use Commercial Residential schedule Residential Small Commerical Single Phase Commercial Small Commericial Multi Phase Commercial Average Rates Residential: $0.1100/kWh Commercial: $0.0848/kWh References ↑ "EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a" Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Clark_County_Rural_E_M_C&oldid=41045

16

Substation in Clark County, Nevada RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Substation for soil remediation. Substation for soil remediation. The attached map shows the borrow area which is situated in Sections 18, 19,20 Township 18 South Range 64 East, Mount Diablo Meridian, Clark County, Nevada. The corresponding U.S.G.S. 7.S-minute topographic maps are Apex, Dry Lake, Dry Lake NW, and Dry Lake SE, Nevada. B. Categorical Exclusion Applied: 10 CFR, Part 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B4.11: "Construction of electric power substations with power delivery at 230kV or below or modification of existing sUbstations." C. Regulatory Requirements in 10 CFR 1021.410 Ib): 1. The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix B to Subpart D. a. The proposed action was reviewed for the requirements of the Endangered Species Act, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the National

17

Substation in Clark County, Nevada RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SUbstation for soil remediation. SUbstation for soil remediation. The attached map shows the borrow area which is situated in Sections 18, 19,20 Township 18 South Range 64 East, Mount Diablo Meridian, Clark County, Nevada. The corresponding U.S.G.S. 7.5-minute topographic maps are Apex, Dry Lake, Dry Lake NW, and Dry Lake SE, Nevada. B. Categorical Exclusion Applied: 10 CFR, Part 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B4.11: "Construction of electric power substations with power delivery at 230kV or below or modification of existing SUbstations." C. Regulatory Requirements in 10 CFR 1021.410 (b): 1. The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix B to Subpart D. a. The proposed action was reviewed for the requirements of the Endangered Species Act, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the National

18

Clark County, Nevada RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Basic (BAS) Basic (BAS) Phase" Soil Remediation located in Clark County, Nevada RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION A. Proposed Action: Western proposes to excavate PCB and TPH contaminated soils within the Basic Substation yards 1, 2 and 3 as well as the T9 and T10 areas as well as remove asbestos wrapped pipe and conduit. Western will also be removing creosote-contaminated railroad ties. We will use existing access roads and vehicles such as pickup trucks, crew trucks, backhoes and dump trucks. This work is necessary to maintain sanitary and safe working conditions. The attached map shows the project area location northwest of Henderson, Nevada. The legal description is Section 13 Township 22 South Range 62 East & Section 18 Township 22 South Range 63 East on the Mt. Diablo Baseline and Meridian (USGS Las

19

EA-1969: Clark Fork River Delta Restoration Project, Bonner County, Idaho  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Bonneville Power Administration is preparing an environmental assessment to analyze the potential effects of a proposal to restore wetland and riparian (riverbank) habitat and to reduce erosion in the Clark Fork River delta located in Bonner County, Idaho.

20

Clark County - Solar and Wind Building Permit Guides (Nevada...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

and commercial wind projects must submit commercial electrical sub permit applications. Solar permit applications must include minimum electric design information to confirm that...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "including clark county" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Funding for state, city, and county governments in the state includes:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NV NV Nevada Total Sum City, County, and SEO Allocations All $31,983,500 NV Nevada State Energy Office $9,593,500 NV Boulder City City $61,600 NV Carson City City $538,900 NV Elko City $76,500 NV Fernley City $52,000 NV Henderson City $2,237,000 NV Las Vegas City $5,449,200 NV Mesquite City $69,900 NV North Las Vegas City $1,907,400 NV Reno City $2,142,800 NV Sparks City $840,000 NV Churchill County $104,900 NV Clark County $7,663,500 NV Douglas County $195,000 NV Elko County $123,600 NV Humboldt County $75,600 NV Lyon County $165,200 NV Nye County $185,700 NV Pershing County $50,000 NV Washoe County $401,200 NV White Pine County $50,000 In addition, today's announcement includes funding for the following Tribal

22

Funding for state, city, and county governments in the state includes:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MT MT Montana Total Sum City, County, and SEO Allocations All $13,971,000 MT Montana State Energy Office $9,593,500 MT Anaconda-Deer Lodge City $50,000 MT Billings City $1,003,000 MT Bozeman City $175,500 MT Butte-Silver Bow City $138,700 MT Great Falls City $570,100 MT Havre City $50,000 MT Helena City $138,600 MT Kalispell City $96,700 MT Miles City City $50,000 MT Missoula City $680,400 MT Cascade County $94,400 MT Flathead County $274,200 MT Gallatin County $198,700 MT Lake County $119,500 MT Lewis and Clark County $120,400 MT Lincoln County $80,000 MT Missoula County $151,000 MT Park County $67,100 MT Ravalli County $167,400 MT Yellowstone County $151,800 In addition, today's announcement includes funding for the following Tribal

23

David Clark  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Clark is a Senior Research Scientist at the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL). Since the mid 70s, Dr. Clark has been leading the development...

24

Final Systems Development Report for the Clark County Socioeconomic Impact Assessment of the Proposed High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository at Yucca Mountain, NV  

SciTech Connect

The Systems Development Report represents the third major step in the Clark County Socioeconomic Impact Assessment of the Proposed High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository at Yucca Mound Nevada. The first of these steps was to forge a Research Design that would serve as a guide for the overall research process. The second step was the construction of the Base Case, the purpose of which was to describe existing conditions in Clark County in the specified analytic areas of Economic-Demographic/Fiscal, Emergency Planning and Management, Transportation and Sociocultural analysis. The base case description will serve as a basis for assessing changes in these topic areas that might result from the Yucca Mountain project. These changes will be assessed by analyzing conditions with and without repository development in the county. Prior to performing such assessments, however, the snapshot type of data found in the base case must be operationalized or systematized to allow for more dynamic data utilization. In other words, a data system that can be used to analyze the consequences of the introduction of different variables (or variable values) in the Clark County context must be constructed. Such a system must be capable of being updated through subsequent data collection and monitoring efforts to both provide a rolling base case and supply information necessary to construct trend analyses. For example, during the Impact Assessment phase of the study process, the without repository analysis is accomplished by analyzing growth for the county given existing conditions and likely trends. These data are then compared to the with Yucca Mountain project conditions anticipated for the county. Similarly, once the emergency planning management and response needs associated with the repository are described, these needs will be juxtaposed against existing (and various future) capacity(ies) in order to determine the nature and magnitude of impacts in this analytic area. Analogous tasks will be performed for the other analytic areas detailed in the Base Case and outlined below.

NONE

1992-06-18T23:59:59.000Z

25

Kyle Clark  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

He, Gi Suk Hwang, Zulima Martin, Kyle Clark, Adam Z. Weber, and Nana Zhao. "Bridge to Fuel Cell Molecular Catalysis: 3D Non-Platinum Group Metal Catalyst in MEAs." ECS...

26

Kyle Clark  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Kyle Clark Electrochemical Technologies Group Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 Cyclotron Road MS 62R0203 Berkeley CA 94720 Office Location: 62-0309F (510) 486-6279...

27

Improved Oil Recovery from Upper Jurassic Smackover Carbonates through the Application of Advanced Technologies at Womack Hill Oil Field, Choctaw and Clarke Counties, Eastern Gulf Costal Plain  

SciTech Connect

Pruet Production Co. and the Center for Sedimentary Basin Studies at the University of Alabama, in cooperation with Texas A&M University, Mississippi State University, University of Mississippi, and Wayne Stafford and Associates proposed a three-phase, focused, comprehensive, integrated and multidisciplinary study of Upper Jurassic Smackover carbonates (Class II Reservoir), involving reservoir characterization and 3-D modeling (Phase I) and a field demonstration project (Phases II and III) at Womack Hill Field Unit, Choctaw and Clarke Counties, Alabama, eastern Gulf Coastal Plain. Phase I of the project has been completed. The principal objectives of the project are: increasing the productivity and profitability of the Womack Hill Field Unit, thereby extending the economic life of this Class II Reservoir and transferring effectively and in a timely manner the knowledge gained and technology developed from this project to producers who are operating other domestic fields with Class II Reservoirs. The major tasks of the project included reservoir characterization, recovery technology analysis, recovery technology evaluation, and the decision to implement a demonstration project. Reservoir characterization consisted of geoscientific reservoir characterization, petrophysical and engineering property characterization, microbial characterization, and integration of the characterization data. Recovery technology analysis included 3-D geologic modeling, reservoir simulation, and microbial core experiments. Recovery technology evaluation consisted of acquiring and evaluating new high quality 2-D seismic data, evaluating the existing pressure maintenance project in the Womack Hill Field Unit, and evaluating the concept of an immobilized enzyme technology project for the Womack Hill Field Unit. The decision to implement a demonstration project essentially resulted in the decision on whether to conduct an infill drilling project in Womack Hill Field. Reservoir performance, multiwell productivity analysis, and reservoir simulation studies indicate that water injection continues to provide stable support to maintain production from wells in the western unitized area of the field and that the strong water drive present in the eastern area of the field is adequate to sustain production from this part of the field. Although the results from the microbial characterization and microbial core experiments are very promising, it is recommended that an immobilized enzyme technology project not be implemented in the Womack Hill Field Unit until live (freshly taken and properly preserved) cores from the Smackover reservoir in the field are acquired to confirm the microbial core experiments to date. From 3-D geologic modeling, reservoir performance analysis, and reservoir simulation, four areas in the Womack Hill Field were identified as prospective infill drilling sites to recover undrained oil from the field. It was determined that the two areas in the unit area probably can be effectively drained by perforating higher zones in the Smackover reservoir in currently producing wells. The two areas in the eastern (non-unitized) part of the field require the drilling of new wells. The successful drilling and testing of a well in 2003 by J. R. Pounds, Inc. has proven the oil potential of the easternmost site in the non-unitized part of the field. Pruet Production Co. acquired new 2-D seismic data to evaluate the oil potential of the westernmost site. Because of the effects of a fault shadow from the major fault bounding the southern border of the Womack Hill Field, it is difficult to evaluate conclusively this potential drill site. Pruet Production Co. has decided not to drill this new well at this time and to further evaluate the new 2-D seismic profiles after these data have been processed using a pre-stack migration technique. Pruet Production Co. has elected not to continue into Phase II of this project because they are not prepared to make a proposal to the other mineral interest owners regarding the drilling of new wells as part of an infil

Ernest A. Mancini

2006-05-31T23:59:59.000Z

28

Improved Oil Recovery from Upper Jurassic Smackover Carbonates through the Application of Advanced Technologies at Womack Hill Oil Field, Choctaw and Clarke Counties, Eastern Gulf Coastal Plain  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Pruet Production Co. and the Center for Sedimentary Basin Studies at the University of Alabama, in cooperation with Texas A&M University, Mississippi State University, University of Mississippi, and Wayne Stafford and Associates proposed a three-phase, focused, comprehensive, integrated and multidisciplinary study of Upper Jurassic Smackover carbonates (Class II Reservoir), involving reservoir characterization and 3-D modeling (Phase I) and a field demonstration project (Phases II and III) at Womack Hill Field Unit, Choctaw and Clarke Counties, Alabama, eastern Gulf Coastal Plain. Phase I of the project has been completed. The principal objectives of the project are: increasing the productivity and profitability of the Womack Hill Field Unit, thereby extending the economic life of this Class II Reservoir and transferring effectively and in a timely manner the knowledge gained and technology developed from this project to producers who are operating other domestic fields with Class II Reservoirs. The major tasks of the project included reservoir characterization, recovery technology analysis, recovery technology evaluation, and the decision to implement a demonstration project. Reservoir characterization consisted of geoscientific reservoir characterization, petrophysical and engineering property characterization, microbial characterization, and integration of the characterization data. Recovery technology analysis included 3-D geologic modeling, reservoir simulation, and microbial core experiments. Recovery technology evaluation consisted of acquiring and evaluating new high quality 2-D seismic data, evaluating the existing pressure maintenance project in the Womack Hill Field Unit, and evaluating the concept of an immobilized enzyme technology project for the Womack Hill Field Unit. The decision to implement a demonstration project essentially resulted in the decision on whether to conduct an infill drilling project in Womack Hill Field. Reservoir performance, multiwell productivity analysis, and reservoir simulation studies indicate that water injection continues to provide stable support to maintain production from wells in the western unitized area of the field and that the strong water drive present in the eastern area of the field is adequate to sustain production from this part of the field. Although the results from the microbial characterization and microbial core experiments are very promising, it is recommended that an immobilized enzyme technology project not be implemented in the Womack Hill Field Unit until live (freshly taken and properly preserved) cores from the Smackover reservoir in the field are acquired to confirm the microbial core experiments to date. From 3-D geologic modeling, reservoir performance analysis, and reservoir simulation, four areas in the Womack Hill Field were identified as prospective infill drilling sites to recover undrained oil from the field. It was determined that the two areas in the unit area probably can be effectively drained by perforating higher zones in the Smackover reservoir in currently producing wells. The two areas in the eastern (non-unitized) part of the field require the drilling of new wells. The successful drilling and testing of a well in 2003 by J. R. Pounds, Inc. has proven the oil potential of the easternmost site in the non-unitized part of the field. Pruet Production Co. acquired new 2-D seismic data to evaluate the oil potential of the westernmost site. Because of the effects of a fault shadow from the major fault bounding the southern border of the Womack Hill Field, it is difficult to evaluate conclusively this potential drill site. Pruet Production Co. has decided not to drill this new well at this time and to further evaluate the new 2-D seismic profiles after these data have been processed using a pre-stack migration technique. Pruet Production Co. has elected not to continue into Phase II of this project because they are not prepared to make a proposal to the other mineral interest owners regarding the drilling of new wells as part of an infil

Ernest A. Mancini

2003-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

29

Funding for state, city, and county governments in the state includes:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NE Nebraska Total Sum City, County, and SEO Allocations NE Nebraska Total Sum City, County, and SEO Allocations All $18,810,300 NE Nebraska State Energy Office $9,593,500 NE Bellevue City $194,200 NE Fremont City $106,400 NE Grand Island City $199,000 NE Hastings City $109,900 NE Kearney City $131,100 NE Lincoln City $2,401,000 NE Norfolk City $101,500 NE North Platte City $105,300 NE Omaha City $4,331,500 NE Papillion City $91,300 NE Cass County $99,900 NE Dakota County $87,300 NE Dawson County $106,300 NE Douglas County $255,800 NE Gage County $98,000 NE Lancaster County $110,300 NE Platte County $139,200 NE Sarpy County $312,600 NE Saunders County $80,600 NE Scotts Bluff County $155,600 In addition, today's announcement includes funding for the following Tribal

30

Funding for state, city, and county governments in the state includes:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NM New Mexico Total Sum City, County, and SEO NM New Mexico Total Sum City, County, and SEO Allocations All $20,608,300 NM New Mexico State Energy Office $9,593,500 NM Alamogordo City $147,700 NM Albuquerque City $5,051,200 NM Carlsbad City $107,800 NM Clovis City $139,800 NM Farmington City $191,800 NM Hobbs City $128,700 NM Las Cruces City $888,000 NM Rio Rancho City $697,000 NM Roswell City $195,500 NM Santa Fe City $781,600 NM Bernalillo County $459,500 NM Dona Ana County $446,900 NM Grant County $126,400 NM McKinley County $299,600 NM Rio Arriba County $166,500 NM San Juan County $329,400 NM Sandoval County $169,500 NM Santa Fe County $264,000 NM Taos County $134,100 NM Valencia County $289,800 In addition, today's announcement includes funding for the following Tribal

31

RMOTC - Staff - Clark Turner  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Clarke Turner, RMOTC Director Clarke Turner, Director Clarke Turner is the director of RMOTC and NPR-3. With offices located in Casper and at NPR-3 35 miles northeast of Casper,...

32

Clark County REMC - Clark County REMC - Residential Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Efficiency Rebate Program Eligibility Residential Savings For Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Cooling Heat Pumps Appliances & Electronics Water...

33

Strontium Isotopic Composition of Paleozoic Carbonate Rocks in the Nevada Test Site Vicinity, Clark, Lincoln, and Nye Counties, Nevada and Inyo County, California.  

SciTech Connect

Ground water moving through permeable Paleozoic carbonate rocks represents the most likely pathway for migration of radioactive contaminants from nuclear weapons testing at the Nevada Test Site, Nye County, Nevada. The strontium isotopic composition (87Sr/86Sr) of ground water offers a useful means of testing hydrochemical models of regional flow involving advection and reaction. However, reaction models require knowledge of 87Sr/86Sr data for carbonate rock in the Nevada Test Site vicinity, which is scarce. To fill this data gap, samples of core or cuttings were selected from 22 boreholes at depth intervals from which water samples had been obtained previously around the Nevada Test Site at Yucca Flat, Frenchman Flat, Rainier Mesa, and Mercury Valley. Dilute acid leachates of these samples were analyzed for a suite of major- and trace-element concentrations (MgO, CaO, SiO2, Al2O3, MnO, Rb, Sr, Th, and U) as well as for 87Sr/86Sr. Also presented are unpublished analyses of 114 Paleozoic carbonate samples from outcrops, road cuts, or underground sites in the Funeral Mountains, Bare Mountain, Striped Hills, Specter Range, Spring Mountains, and ranges east of the Nevada Test Site measured in the early 1990's. These data originally were collected to evaluate the potential for economic mineral deposition at the potential high-level radioactive waste repository site at Yucca Mountain and adjacent areas (Peterman and others, 1994). Samples were analyzed for a suite of trace elements (Rb, Sr, Zr, Ba, La, and Ce) in bulk-rock powders, and 87Sr/86Sr in partial digestions of carbonate rock using dilute acid or total digestions of silicate-rich rocks. Pre-Tertiary core samples from two boreholes in the central or western part of the Nevada Test Site also were analyzed. Data are presented in tables and summarized in graphs; however, no attempt is made to interpret results with respect to ground-water flow paths in this report. Present-day 87Sr/86Sr values are compared to values for Paleozoic seawater present at the time of deposition. Many of the samples have 87Sr/86Sr compositions that remain relatively unmodified from expected seawater values. However, rocks underlying the northern Nevada Test Site as well as rocks exposed at Bare Mountain commonly have elevated 87Sr/86Sr values derived from post-depositional addition of radiogenic Sr most likely from fluids circulating through rubidium-rich Paleozoic strata or Precambrian basement rocks.

James B. Paces; Zell E. Peterman; Kiyoto Futa; Thomas A. Oliver; and Brian D. Marshall.

2007-08-07T23:59:59.000Z

34

Paul Clarke  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

active duty Air Force officer from 1987 to 2007. His service included a tour as an intelligence officer for G.H.W. Bush's National Security Council. Later, he was White House...

35

Alexandria Clark | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Alexandria Clark About Us Alexandria Clark - Rising Junior, Claflin University Most Recent Sending off our Summer Interns with Energy Literacy & Work Experience August 9 Spelman...

36

Funding for state, city, and county governments in the state includes:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MO MO Missouri Total Sum City, County, and SEO Allocations All $43,779,300 MO Missouri State Energy Office $12,568,100 MO Blue Springs City $490,600 MO Cape Girardeau City $173,000 MO Chesterfield City $219,500 MO Columbia City $1,018,300 MO Florissant City $452,200 MO Independence City $1,014,100 MO Jefferson City City $205,400 MO Joplin City $236,500 MO Kansas City City $4,823,200 MO Lee's Summit City $762,700 MO O'Fallon City $681,200 MO Springfield City $1,664,600 MO St. Charles City $615,600 MO St. Joseph City $757,200 MO St. Louis City $3,717,500 MO St. Peters City $512,800 MO University City City $149,600 MO Cass County $378,500 MO Christian County $290,900 MO Clay County $447,800

37

County  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Pine County Pine County White Pine County Board of County Commissioners Board of County Commissioners February 10, 1998 W. Eric J. Fygi U.S. Department of Energy Office of General Counsel GC-52 1000 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20585 Subject: Department of Energy (DOE) Price-Anderson Act Comments from White Pine County, Nevada Dear Mr. Fygi: Thank you for providing White Pine County with the opportunity to comment concerning the continuation or modifications of the provisions of the Price-Anderson Act. We understand that these comments will be used to assist the Department of Energy in preparing a required report to Congress. You will note in reviewing our comments that the views of many "Affected Units of Government" in Nevada are similar to each other and that we have worked together in developing

38

A Hydrostratigraphic Framework Model and Alternatives for the Groundwater Flow and Contaminant Transport Model of Corrective Action Unit 98: Frenchman Flat, Clark, Lincoln and Nye Counties, Nevada  

SciTech Connect

A new, revised three-dimensional (3-D) hydrostratigraphic framework model for Frenchman Flat was completed in 2004. The area of interest includes Frenchman Flat, a former nuclear testing area at the Nevada Test Site, and proximal areas. Internal and external reviews of an earlier (Phase I) Frenchman Flat model recommended additional data collection to address uncertainties. Subsequently, additional data were collected for this Phase II initiative, including five new drill holes and a 3-D seismic survey.

Bechtel Nevada

2005-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

39

COUNTY\  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ESMERALDA COUNTY, NEVADA MEMBERS STAFF SUSAN W. DUDLEY, CHAIRMAN BEVERLY J. RELYEA GARY O'CONNOR, VICE CHAIRMAN ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT BEN VILJOEN, LIQUOR BOARD (702)485-3406 January 20, 1998 U.S. Department of Energy Office of General Counsel GCS-52 1000 Independence Ave. SW Washington, DC 20585 RE: COMMENT BY ESMERALDA COUNTY, NEVADA CONCERNING THE CONTINUATION OR MODIFICATION OF DOE PRICE-ANDERSON ACT Dear Sirs: The DOE Price-Anderson indemnification is intended to provide coverage for contractors for the benefit of any victims of a nuclear accident or incident or a precautionary evacuation arising from activity under a DOE contracts. The public perception is that if there is a nuclear accident resulting in a dispersal of

40

A Hydrostratigraphic System for Modeling Groundwater Flow and Radionuclide Migration at the Corrective Action Unit Scale, Nevada Test Site and Surrounding Areas, Clark, Lincoln, and Nye Counties, Nevada  

SciTech Connect

Underground Test Area (UGTA) corrective action unit (CAU) groundwater flow and contaminant transport models of the Nevada Test Site (NTS) and vicinity are built upon hydrostratigraphic framework models (HFMs) that utilize the hydrostratigraphic unit (HSU) as the fundamental modeling component. The delineation and three-dimensional (3-D) modeling of HSUs within the highly complex geologic terrain that is the NTS requires a hydrostratigraphic system that is internally consistent, yet flexible enough to account for overlapping model areas, varied geologic terrain, and the development of multiple alternative HFMs. The UGTA CAU-scale hydrostratigraphic system builds on more than 50 years of geologic and hydrologic work in the NTS region. It includes 76 HSUs developed from nearly 300 stratigraphic units that span more than 570 million years of geologic time, and includes rock units as diverse as marine carbonate and siliciclastic rocks, granitic intrusives, rhyolitic lavas and ash-flow tuffs, and alluvial valley-fill deposits. The UGTA CAU-scale hydrostratigraphic system uses a geology-based approach and two-level classification scheme. The first, or lowest, level of the hydrostratigraphic system is the hydrogeologic unit (HGU). Rocks in a model area are first classified as one of ten HGUs based on the rocks ability to transmit groundwater (i.e., nature of their porosity and permeability), which at the NTS is mainly a function of the rocks primary lithology, type and degree of postdepositional alteration, and propensity to fracture. The second, or highest, level within the UGTA CAU-scale hydrostratigraphic system is the HSU, which is the fundamental mapping/modeling unit within UGTA CAU-scale HFMs. HSUs are 3-D bodies that are represented in the finite element mesh for the UGTA groundwater modeling process. HSUs are defined systematically by stratigraphically organizing HGUs of similar character into larger HSUs designations. The careful integration of stratigraphic information in the development of HSUs is important to assure individual HSUs are internally consistent, correlatable, and mappable throughout all the model areas.

Lance Prothro, Sigmund Drellack Jr., Jennifer Mercadante

2009-01-31T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "including clark county" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

EIS-0436: I-5 Corridor Reinforcement Project, Multnomah County, Oregon and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

36: I-5 Corridor Reinforcement Project, Multnomah County, 36: I-5 Corridor Reinforcement Project, Multnomah County, Oregon and Cowlitz and Clark Counties, Washington EIS-0436: I-5 Corridor Reinforcement Project, Multnomah County, Oregon and Cowlitz and Clark Counties, Washington SUMMARY This EIS will evaluate a proposal by BPA to build a 500-kilovolt (kV) lattice-steel-tower transmission line that would run from a new 500-kV substation near Castle Rock, Wash., to a new 500-kV substation near Troutdale, Ore. After initially identifying a large number of route segments, BPA combined those segments into four action alternatives (each with options): West, Central, East, and Crossover. The action alternatives and the No Action Alternative are analyzed in the draft EIS. The alternatives vary in length and include both existing and new

42

Funding for state, city, and county governments in the state includes:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NY NY New York Total Sum City, County, and SEO Allocations All $175,122,300 NY New York State Energy Office $29,760,600 NY Albany City $1,104,000 NY Amherst City $1,052,700 NY Babylon City $1,545,200 NY Binghamton City $204,200 NY Brookhaven City $4,141,200 NY Buffalo City $2,736,900 NY Cheektowaga City $718,800 NY Clarkstown City $751,300 NY Clay City $515,100 NY Clifton Park City $149,200 NY Colonie City $661,900 NY Freeport City $173,100 NY Greece City $831,900 NY Greenburgh City $186,000 NY Hamburg City $187,300 NY Hempstead City $4,577,700 NY Hempstead City $479,800 NY Henrietta City $213,700 NY Huntington City $1,725,200 NY Irondequoit City $440,000 NY Islip City $3,026,100 NY

43

Funding for state, city, and county governments in the state includes:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PA Pennsylvania Total Sum City, County, and SEO Allocations All $102,508,400 PA Pennsylvania State Energy Office $23,574,800 PA Abington City $500,400 PA Allen City $1,038,800 PA Altoona City $205,700 PA Bensalem City $576,600 PA Bethlehem City $702,100 PA Bristol City $492,500 PA Cheltenham City $147,400 PA Chester City $156,000 PA Erie City $1,031,500 PA Harrisburg City $256,200 PA Haverford City $190,000 PA Hempfield City $168,400 PA Lancaster City $575,900 PA Lower Merion City $587,600 PA Lower Paxton City $185,200 PA Manheim City $160,600 PA Middletown City $189,200 PA Millcreek City $491,600 PA Northampton City $160,800 PA Penn Hills City $181,400 PA Philadelphia City $14,108,700

44

Charlton I. Clark | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Charlton I. Clark About Us Charlton I. Clark - Integration Team Lead, Wind and Water Power Program Most Recent New Report: Integrating Variable Wind Energy into the Grid December...

45

Clark Energy Group LLC | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Clark Energy Group LLC Clark Energy Group LLC Jump to: navigation, search Name Clark Energy Group LLC Place Arlington, Virginia Zip 22203 Sector Efficiency, Renewable Energy Product Virginia-based energy efficiency and renewable energy project developer. References Clark Energy Group LLC[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Clark Energy Group LLC is a company located in Arlington, Virginia . References ↑ "Clark Energy Group LLC" Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Clark_Energy_Group_LLC&oldid=343635" Categories: Clean Energy Organizations Companies Organizations Stubs What links here Related changes Special pages Printable version Permanent link

46

Clark Public Utilities - Residential Heat Pump Loan Program | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Heat Pump Loan Program Heat Pump Loan Program Clark Public Utilities - Residential Heat Pump Loan Program < Back Eligibility Residential Savings Category Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Heat Pumps Maximum Rebate Air-Source Heat Pumps: $20,000 Geothermal Heat Pumps: $30,000 Program Info State District of Columbia Program Type Utility Loan Program Rebate Amount Air-Source Heat Pump: up to $20,000 Geothermal Heat Pumps: up to $30,000 Provider Clark Public Utilities Clark Public Utilities offers loans of up to $20,000 for air-source heat pumps and $30,000 for geothermal heat pumps. Loans will help customers cover the up-front cost of installing a highly efficient heat pump in a residence. All electrically heated homes, including manufactured homes, are eligible for the heat pump financing program, as long as the home has been

47

Clark Atlanta Universities (CAU) Energy Related Research Capabilities...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Clark Atlanta Universities (CAU) Energy Related Research Capabilities Clark Atlanta Universities (CAU) Energy Related Research Capabilities How energy related research has helped...

48

Clark Energy Group ESCO Qualification Sheet  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Introduction to Clark Energy Group Introduction to Clark Energy Group Clark Energy Group offers comprehensive, turn-key energy and water solutions with a focus on renewable energy and building efficiency. We partner with public and private clients to deliver projects that enhance energy security, protect the environment, and save our customers money. Our $5 billion Super ESPC contract with the U.S. Department of Energy allows us to contract with any federal agency for energy-related projects. On the private side, we work on a wide variety of institutional facilities such as data centers, laboratories, multi-family housing, campuses, and high-performance office buildings. Clark's long history of success on complex projects allow us to

49

Clark Energy- Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Programs  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Clark Energy offers a free energy audit to provide residential customers with suggestions on ways to improve the energy efficiency of participating homes. Rebates are available for customers who...

50

Improved Oil Recovery from Upper Jurassic Smackover Carbonates through the Application of Advanced Technologies at Womack Hill Oil Field, Choctaw and Clarke Counties, Eastern Gulf Coastal Plain, Class II  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The principal objectives of this project was to: increase the productivity and profitability of the Womack Hill Field Unit, thereby extending the economic life of this Class II Reservoir and transferring effectively and in a timely manner the knowledge gained and technology developed from this project to producers who are operating other domestic fields with Class II Reservoirs. Efforts for Year 1 of this project has been reservoir characterization, which has included three (3) primary tasks: geoscientific reservoir characterization, petrophysical and engineering property characterization, and microbial characterization.

Mancini, Ernest A.; Cate, David; Blasingame, Thomas; Major, R.P.; Brown, Lewis; Stafford, Wayne

2001-08-07T23:59:59.000Z

51

Clark County, Wisconsin: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

35°, -90.7532809° 35°, -90.7532809° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":44.8480735,"lon":-90.7532809,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

52

Clark County, Arkansas: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

0232374°, -93.1779659° 0232374°, -93.1779659° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":34.0232374,"lon":-93.1779659,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

53

Clark County, Ohio: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

°, -83.6773928° °, -83.6773928° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":39.8912092,"lon":-83.6773928,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

54

Clark County, Missouri: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

°, -91.7538817° °, -91.7538817° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":40.3772378,"lon":-91.7538817,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

55

Clark County, Kansas: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

5°, -99.8124935° 5°, -99.8124935° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":37.3158895,"lon":-99.8124935,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

56

Clark County, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

7466471°, -122.5194378° 7466471°, -122.5194378° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":45.7466471,"lon":-122.5194378,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

57

Clark County, South Dakota: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

9587°, -97.7180753° 9587°, -97.7180753° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":44.8139587,"lon":-97.7180753,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

58

Lewis and Clark County, Montana: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

963974°, -112.4029787° 963974°, -112.4029787° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.2963974,"lon":-112.4029787,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

59

Clark County, Illinois: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

87.7763333° 87.7763333° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":39.3824189,"lon":-87.7763333,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

60

Clark County, Nevada: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

.0795613°, -115.094045° .0795613°, -115.094045° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":36.0795613,"lon":-115.094045,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "including clark county" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Clarke County, Mississippi: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

8.7108964° 8.7108964° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":32.077218,"lon":-88.7108964,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

62

Clark County, Indiana: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

85.7256372° 85.7256372° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":38.4492903,"lon":-85.7256372,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

63

Clarke County, Iowa: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

3.7841503° 3.7841503° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":41.0177836,"lon":-93.7841503,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

64

Clarke County, Georgia: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

3.357567° 3.357567° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":33.9519347,"lon":-83.357567,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

65

Clark County - Solar and Wind Building Permit Guides | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

& Local Government Science & Innovation Science & Technology Science Education Innovation Energy Sources Energy Usage Energy Efficiency Mission News & Blog Maps Data About Us For...

66

Athens-Clarke County - Green Business Revolving Loan Fund (Georgia...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Technologies Agricultural Equipment, Doors, Processing and Manufacturing Equipment, Windows, Solar Water Heat, Unspecified technologies Active Incentive Yes Implementing Sector...

67

Clarke County, Alabama: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

7002461°, -87.7763333° 7002461°, -87.7763333° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":31.7002461,"lon":-87.7763333,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

68

Clark County, Idaho: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

4.1975553°, -112.3755496° 4.1975553°, -112.3755496° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":44.1975553,"lon":-112.3755496,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

69

Clark County, Kentucky: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

1435136° 1435136° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":37.959945,"lon":-84.1435136,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

70

Clarke County, Virginia: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

583°, -77.973865° 583°, -77.973865° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":39.1516583,"lon":-77.973865,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

71

Clark Public Utilities - Residential Weatherization Loan Program |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Weatherization Loan Program Weatherization Loan Program Clark Public Utilities - Residential Weatherization Loan Program < Back Eligibility Residential Savings Category Home Weatherization Commercial Weatherization Sealing Your Home Ventilation Windows, Doors, & Skylights Maximum Rebate $15,000 Program Info State District of Columbia Program Type Utility Loan Program Rebate Amount up to $15,000 Provider Clark Public Utilities Loans of up to $15,000 at a 5.25% interest are available through Clark Public Utilities' Weatherization Loan Program. The loans can pay for the average local cost of eligible measures, based on recently completed projects. Customers have up to seven years to repay the loans, but monthly payments will be at least $25. The utility charges a $225 or $350 loan set-up fee, depending on the loan amount, which can be paid up front or

72

Uranium potential of southwestern New Mexico (southern Hidalgo County), including observations on crystallization history of lavas and ash tuffs and the release of uranium from them. Final report  

SciTech Connect

Geological environments present in southwestern New Mexico include thick sequences of sedimentary rock including limestone, conglomerates, sandstone, and shale: igneous intrusions with associated metal deposits; caldera centers, margins, and outflow facies; and basins with marginal faults and thick late Cenozoic sedimentary fillings. Predominant rock types are Paleozoic carbonates, Mesozoic terrigeneous rocks and carbonates, and Cenozoic volcanic rocks and basin-filling terrigeneous rocks. Consideration of information available in Preliminary Reconnaissance Reports and in Hydrogeochemical and Stream Reconnaissance Reports together with 347 new whole rock chemical analyses points to three areas of anomalous uranium abundance in Hidalgo County, New Mexico. The area has experienced three major periods of igneous activity in Phanerozoic time: one associated with the Laramide cycle of the Late Cretaceous and early Tertiary, mid-Tertiary cycle of silicic volcanism with abundant calderas, and a late Tertiary cycle of mafic volcanism. Silicic volcanic rocks are the most common exposed rock type in the area, and the most enriched in uranium (range, 0.4 to 19 ppM). The most likely source for any uranium ore-forming solutions lies with this cycle of volcanism. Solutions might have been introduced during volcanism or formed later by groundwater leaching of cooled volcanic rocks. Results indicate that groundwater leaching of cooled volcanic rocks was not an effective means of mobilizing uranium in the area. Study of several rhyolite lava flows indicates that they were emplaced in supercooled condition and may have crystallized completely at temperatures well below their liquids, or they may have warmed as crystallization released latent heat. Statistical comparison of the uranium concentration revealed no differences between vitrophyres and associated felsites.

Walton, A.W.; Salter, T.L.; Zetterlund, D.

1980-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

73

Clark Energy - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Programs | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Clark Energy - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Programs Clark Energy - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Programs Clark Energy - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Programs < Back Eligibility Residential Savings Category Home Weatherization Commercial Weatherization Heating & Cooling Construction Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Sealing Your Home Windows, Doors, & Skylights Heat Pumps Program Info State Kentucky Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount Geothermal Heat Pumps: $500 - $1000 Air-Source Heat Pumps: $500 - $1000 Weatherization Measures: Varies Touchstone Energy Home with Air-Source/Geothermal Heat Pump: $250 - $750 Provider Clark Energy Clark Energy offers a free energy audit to provide residential customers with suggestions on ways to improve the energy efficiency of participating

74

Adventures in Ichthyology: Pacific Northwest Fishes of the Lewis and Clark Expedition  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Captains Meriwether Lewis and William Clark and other members of their expedition collected and identified nearly 400 species of plants and animals during the Voyage of Discovery. Of this total, 31 species of fish were included in Burroughs summary of the natural history of the Expedition, including 12 fishes considered unknown to science at that time. While there is little doubt of the identity of fish for which Lewis and Clark provided detailed descriptions in their daily logs, other species designations were largely conjecture based on later scholars interpretation of the Lewis and Clarks account. Unlike other biological specimens encountered during the Expedition, no fishes were brought back for study. As a result, the identity of some fishes was never resolved. Many other fishes were reclassified during the past century based on updated scientific methods.

Dauble, Dennis D.

2005-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

75

Clark Energy Coop Inc | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Clark Energy Coop Inc Clark Energy Coop Inc Place Kentucky Utility Id 3687 Utility Location Yes Ownership C NERC Location SERC NERC SERC Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png General Power Service - Single Phase Commercial General Power Service - Three Phase Commercial General Power Service Industrial Time-of-Day Industrial NET METERING Commercial Outdoor lighting - 175 watt mercury vapor lamp Lighting Outdoor lighting - 400 watt sodium Lighting Public Facilities Commercial Renewable Resource Power Service Commercial Residential Residential Schedule L: General Power Service Industrial

76

Clark Public Utilities - Solar Water Heater Rebate | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Clark Public Utilities - Solar Water Heater Rebate Clark Public Utilities - Solar Water Heater Rebate Clark Public Utilities - Solar Water Heater Rebate < Back Eligibility Commercial Residential Savings Category Heating & Cooling Solar Water Heating Program Info State District of Columbia Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount $500 Provider Clark PUD Clark Public Utilities offers a rebate of $500 to customers who install a solar water heating system. Customers must own the residence or business where the solar water heating system is installed and must have an electric water heater. In addition, Clark Public Utilities offers a [http://dsireusa.org/incentives/incentive.cfm?Incentive_Code=WA29F&re=1&ee=1 loan program] for eligible solar water heater equipment. For additional information, call Energy Services at (360) 992-3355.

77

Clark Public Utilities - Solar Energy Equipment Loan (Washington...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

form History Share this page on Facebook icon Twitter icon Clark Public Utilities - Solar Energy Equipment Loan (Washington) This is the approved revision of this page, as...

78

Clark Fork, Idaho: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Edit with form History Share this page on Facebook icon Twitter icon Clark Fork, Idaho: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates...

79

Funding for state, city, and county governments in the state...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Funding for state, city, and county governments in the state includes: Funding for state, city, and county governments in the state includes: Funding for state, city, and county...

80

County, Nevada RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

antenna re-alignment antenna re-alignment within the fenced area of the Christmas Tree Pass Communication Site, located in Clark County, Nevada RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION A. Proposed Action: Western proposes to re-align the Christmas Tree to Davis antenna within the fenced area of the Christmas Tree Pass Communication Site, Clark County, Nevada. This work is necessary to maintain the safety and reliability of the bulk electrical system. Western will use existing access roads and vehicles such as pickup trucks & crew trucks to bring personnel and equipmentto the work area. The attached map shows the project area location. The legal description is Section 17 Township 31 South, Range 65 East on the Mt. Diablo Meridian (USGS Spirit Mountain, Nevada 7.5' maps). This work is planned to be completed by December 31, 2011.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "including clark county" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

DOE EM-67 FRSTL ~-+-+ B CLARK  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Ofi·/20198 THU 16:26 FAX 202 586 5256 Ofi·/20198 THU 16:26 FAX 202 586 5256 DOE EM-67 FRSTL ~-+-+ B CLARK r r ( DOE/EIS-0218-SA .. l SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS OF ACCEPTANCE OF FOREIGN RESEARCH REACTOR SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL UNDER SCENARIOS NOT SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED IN THE EIS Introduction The Dep~ent of Energy is proposing to transport spent nuclear fuel by ship from forty-one ( 41) eligible countries that host research reactors using, or that have used, United States-enriched uranium as fuel for the reactors. The decision to transport by ship and accept foreign research reactor spent nuclear fuel {FRR SNF) frOm foreign research reactors was based on an analysis of potential environmental impacts in the Final Environmental Impact Statement on a Proposed Nuclear Weapons Nonproliforation Policy Concerning Foreign Research Reactor Spent Nuclear

82

Clarke Electric Coop Inc | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Electric Coop Inc Electric Coop Inc Jump to: navigation, search Name Clarke Electric Coop Inc Place Iowa Utility Id 3722 Utility Location Yes Ownership C NERC Location RFC NERC RFC Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Commercial Commercial Commercial* Commercial Electric Industrial Industrial Large Commercial Commercial Large Commercial* Commercial Large Power* Industrial Off Peak Outdoor Lighting HPS General Lighting Residential Single Phase < 250 kWh Residential Residential Single Phase Service > 250 kWh Residential Urban Single Phase > 250 kWh Residential

83

Clark Ranch Geothermal Area | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Ranch Geothermal Area Ranch Geothermal Area Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Geothermal Resource Area: Clark Ranch Geothermal Area Contents 1 Area Overview 2 History and Infrastructure 3 Regulatory and Environmental Issues 4 Exploration History 5 Well Field Description 6 Geology of the Area 7 Geofluid Geochemistry 8 NEPA-Related Analyses (0) 9 Exploration Activities (0) 10 References Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"TERRAIN","zoom":6,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"500px","height":"300px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":43.8569,"lon":-118.5453,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

84

Notices Disabled, 1401 S. Clark Street, Suite  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

13 Federal Register 13 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Notices Disabled, 1401 S. Clark Street, Suite 10800, Arlington, Virginia 22202-4149. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barry S. Lineback, Telephone: (703) 603-7740, Fax: (703) 603-0655, or email CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Addition On 6/28/2013 (78 FR 38952-38953), the Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled published notice of proposed addition to the Procurement List. After consideration of the material presented to it concerning capability of qualified nonprofit agency to provide the service and impact of the addition on the current or most recent contractors, the Committee has determined that the service listed below is suitable for procurement by the

85

counties - Counties Data | Data.gov  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

- Counties Data Counties Data Apps Challenges Policies Counties You are here Data.gov Communities Counties Counties Data This page features datasets from participating...

86

County\PAAN  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 1998 9, 1998 U.S. Department of Energy Office of General Counsel, GC-52 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20585 COMMENTS TO THE PRICE-ANDERSON ACT NOTICE OF INQUIRY To whom it may concern: The attached comments by the Clark County, Nevada Department of Comprehensive Planning, Nuclear Waste Division, are in reference to a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) released by the Department of Energy (DOE) pursuant to Section 170p of the Atomic Energy Act. From the perspective of local government and the public, we support continuing the comprehensive provisions of the Price-Anderson Act. The need to have available sufficient financial resources to ameliorate impacts from nuclear incidents will be increasingly important in the future. The potential for accidents, for example, will be

87

Clarke-Washington E M C | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Clarke-Washington E M C Clarke-Washington E M C Jump to: navigation, search Name Clarke-Washington E M C Place Alabama Utility Id 40127 Utility Location Yes Ownership C NERC Location SERC Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Security Light: 100 watt w/ pole addition Lighting Security Light: 100 watt without pole Lighting Average Rates Residential: $0.1260/kWh Commercial: $0.1250/kWh Industrial: $0.1130/kWh References ↑ "EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a" Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Clarke-Washington_E_M_C&oldid=410462

88

Lewis and Clark: Pioneering Meteorological Observers in the American West  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The technical achievements of Lewis and Clark have been celebrated in fields ranging from cartography to zoology. As America commemorates the bicentennial of their historic journey across the continent, this paper shows that their meteorological ...

Susan Solomon; John S. Daniel

2004-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

89

Kitsap County  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Kitsap County Goals and Policies on Critical Areas........... 6 The BAS Process............................ 7

unknown authors

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

90

Clark Public Utilities - Solar Energy Equipment Loan | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Equipment Loan Energy Equipment Loan Clark Public Utilities - Solar Energy Equipment Loan < Back Eligibility Commercial Residential Savings Category Solar Buying & Making Electricity Heating & Cooling Swimming Pool Heaters Water Heating Maximum Rebate Solar PV: $30,000 Solar Pool Heaters and Solar Water Heaters: $10,000 Program Info State District of Columbia Program Type Utility Loan Program Rebate Amount Solar PV: up to $30,000 Solar Pool Heaters and Solar Water Heaters: up to $10,000 Provider Clark PUD Clark Public Utilities offers financing available to its customers for the purchase and installation of residential solar equipment. Loans up to $10,000 are available for solar pool heaters and solar water heaters and up to $30,000 for photovoltaic systems. Solar water heater loans, solar pool heater loans and solar PV loans under

91

Codington-Clark Elec Coop, Inc | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Codington-Clark Elec Coop, Inc Codington-Clark Elec Coop, Inc Jump to: navigation, search Name Codington-Clark Elec Coop, Inc Place South Dakota Utility Id 3850 Utility Location Yes Ownership C NERC Location MRO NERC MRO Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png 3 PH Large Industrial 5/7 Large Power Industrial Irrigation Industrial Residential Residential Residential - Electric Heat(Separate Meter) Residential Security Lights Lighting Average Rates Residential: $0.0828/kWh Commercial: $0.0827/kWh References ↑ "EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a"

92

Clark Public Utilities - Commercial Energy Efficiency Rebate Programs |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Clark Public Utilities - Commercial Energy Efficiency Rebate Clark Public Utilities - Commercial Energy Efficiency Rebate Programs Clark Public Utilities - Commercial Energy Efficiency Rebate Programs < Back Eligibility Commercial Fed. Government Industrial Local Government Nonprofit State Government Savings Category Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Design & Remodeling Manufacturing Other Heat Pumps Appliances & Electronics Commercial Lighting Lighting Windows, Doors, & Skylights Program Info State District of Columbia Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount Commercial/Industrial Lighting: Up to 50% project costs Custom Industrial Retrofit: $0.25/kWh up to 50% of cost Custom Industrial New Construction: $0.20 - $0.27/kWh up to 50% of cost

93

Irving Gill and rediscovery of concrete in California the Marie and Chauncey Clark, 1919-22  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The thesis focuses on a large residence by architect Irving Gill: the house for Marie and Chauncey Dwight Clarke in Santa Fe Springs, California (1919-22). The Clarke House was only discovered as a Gill building in 1981; ...

Scensor, Sean

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

94

Funding for state, city, and county governments in the state...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Funding for state, city, and county governments in the state includes: Funding for state, city, and county governments in the state includes: A chart detailling the funding for...

95

Jordan F. Clark Ira Leifer Libe Washburn Bruce P. Luyendyk  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

in natural gas bubble plumes: observations from the Coal Oil Point marine hydrocarbon seep field Received: 22 Detailed measurements of bubble composition, dissolved gas concentrations, and plume dynamics wereORIGINAL Jordan F. Clark ? Ira Leifer ? Libe Washburn Bruce P. Luyendyk Compositional changes

Luyendyk, Bruce

96

County\paa  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Eureka County Eureka County Yucca Mountain Information Office P.O. Box 257 Eureka, Nevada 89316 (702) 237-5372 FAX (702) 237-5708 January 29, 1998 U.S. Department of Energy Office of General Counsel, GC-52 1000 Independence Ave. SW Washington DC 20585 RE: Price-Anderson Act To Whom It May Concern: In response the Federal Register notice of December 31, 1997 requesting public comments on the Price-Anderson Act (PAA), Eureka County, Nevada is submitting these comments. Eureka County is one of the affected units of local government under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 as amended. With potential socioeconomic, environmental and transportation impacts, we have a strong interest in oversight of the DOE's Yucca Mountain project activities, including transportation impacts and

97

Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact: Western's Hoover Dam Bypass Project Phase II (Double-Circuiting a Portion of the Hoover-Mead No.5 and No.7 230-kV Transmission Lines with the Henderson-Mead No.1 230-kV Transmission Line, Clark County, Nevada)  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Highway 93 (U.S. 93) Hoover Dam Bypass Project calls for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Western Area Power Administration (Western) to remove its Arizona and Nevada (A&N) Switchyard. As a result of this action, Western must reconfigure its existing electrical transmission system in the Hoover Dam area. Western proposes to double-circuit a portion of the Hoover-Mead No.5 and No.7 230-kV Transmission Lines with the Henderson-Mead No.1 Transmission Line (see Figure 1-1). Double-circuiting is the placement of two separate electrical circuits, typically in the form of three separate conductors or bundles of conductors, on the same set of transmission line structures. The old Henderson-Hoover 230-kV Transmission Line would become the new Henderson-Mead No.1 and would extend approximately eight miles to connect with the Mead Substation. Western owns, operates, and maintains the Hoover-Mead No.5 and No.7, and Henderson-Hoover electrical power transmission lines. Additionally, approximately 0.25 miles of new right-of-way (ROW) would be needed for the Henderson-Mead No.1 when it transfers from double-circuiting with the Hoover-Mead No.7 to the Hoover-Mead No.5 at the Boulder City Tap. The proposed project would also involve a new transmission line ROW and structures where the Henderson-Mead No.1 will split from the Hoover-Mead No.5 and enter the northeast corner of the Mead Substation. Lastly, Western has proposed adding fiber optic overhead ground wire from the Hoover Power Plant to the Mead Substation on to the Henderson-Mead No.1, Hoover-Mead No.5 and No.7 Transmission Lines. The proposed project includes replacing existing transmission line tower structures, installing new structures, and adding new electrical conductors and fiber optic cables. As a consequence of these activities, ground disturbance may result from grading areas for structure placement, constructing new roads, improving existing roads for vehicle and equipment access, and from installing structures, conductors, and fiber optic cables. Project construction activities would be conducted within the existing 200-foot transmission line ROW and 50-foot access road ROW, although new spur access roads could occur outside of existing ROWs. As lead Federal agency for this action under National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Western must ensure that adverse environmental effects on Federal and non-Federal lands and resources are avoided or minimized. This Environmental Assessment (EA) is intended to be a concise public document that assesses the probable and known impacts to the environment from Western's Proposed Action and alternatives, and reaches a conclusion about the significance of the impacts. This EA was prepared in compliance with NEPA regulations published by the Council on Environmental Quality (40 CFR 1500-1508) and implementing procedures of the Department of Energy (10 CFR 1021).

N /A

2003-10-27T23:59:59.000Z

98

Stability in a new destination : Mexican immigrants in Clark County, Ohio  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

s plans to privatize Pemex, the national oil and gasve never seen any money from Pemex come here to the rancho.

Keyes, David Gordon

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

99

Cook County- LEED Requirements for County Buildings  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

In 2002, Cook County enacted an ordinance requiring all new county buildings and all retrofitted county buildings to be built to LEED standards. Specifically, all newly constructed buildings and...

100

Parallel view-dependent tessellation of Catmull-Clark subdivision surfaces  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

We present a strategy for performing view-adaptive, crack-free tessellation of Catmull-Clark subdivision surfaces entirely on programmable graphics hardware. Our scheme extends the concept of breadth-first subdivision, which up to this point has only ... Keywords: Catmull-Clark, GPGPU, adaptive surface subdivision, subdivision surfaces

Anjul Patney; Mohamed S. Ebeida; John D. Owens

2009-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "including clark county" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Students from Stafford County University of Kansas  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Page 1 10/10/12 15:23:31 Students from Stafford County Fall 2012 University of Kansas All Campuses Overall counts include students whose permanent residence or last high school attended is in Stafford from Stafford County. In Fall 2012, KU has 11 students from Stafford County: · 10 undergraduate · 1

Peterson, Blake R.

102

Students from Stafford County University of Kansas  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Page 1 10/17/11 10:19:19 Students from Stafford County Fall 2011 University of Kansas All Campuses Overall counts include students whose permanent residence or last high school attended is in Stafford students from Stafford County. In Fall 2011, KU has 10 students from Stafford County: · 10 undergraduate KU

Peterson, Blake R.

103

Counties | Data.gov  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Counties Counties Data Apps Challenges Policies Counties Welcome to Counties.Data.gov Bridging information from across the United States. Look at the data, use the apps, join the...

104

Snohomish County Biodiesel Project  

SciTech Connect

Snohomish County in western Washington State began converting its vehicle fleet to use a blend of biodiesel and petroleum diesel in 2005. As prices for biodiesel rose due to increased demand for this cleaner-burning fuel, Snohomish County looked to its farmers to ???¢????????grow???¢??????? this fuel locally. Suitable seed crops that can be crushed to extract oil for use as biodiesel feedstock include canola, mustard, and camelina. The residue, or mash, has high value as an animal feed. County farmers began with 52 acres of canola and mustard crops in 2006, increasing to 250 acres and 356 tons in 2008. In 2009, this number decreased to about 150 acres and 300 tons due to increased price for mustard seed.

Terrill Chang; Deanna Carveth

2010-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

105

The Committee convened in the Clark Room, Holiday Inn Capitol,  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

MEETING MEETING - - - Thursday, April 25, 1996 - - - The Committee convened in the Clark Room, Holiday Inn Capitol, 550 C Street, S.W., Washington, D.C., at 9:00 a.m., Dr. Timothy D. Mount, Chairman, presiding. PRESENT: TIMOTHY D. MOUNT, Chairman SAMPRIT CHATTERJEE BRENDA G. COX JOHN D. GRACE CALVIN KENT GRETA M. LJUNG RICHARD A. LOCKHART DANIEL A. RELLES PRESENT (Continued): BRADLEY O. SKARPNESS G. CAMPBELL WATKINS ALSO PRESENT: RENEE MILLER YVONNE BISHOP MARY HUTZLER JAY HAKES DOUGLAS HALE ART HOLLAND ARTHUR RYPINSKI LOUISE GUEY-LEE JOHN CYMBALSKY ERIN BOEDECKER JERRY COFFEY INDER KUNDRA C O N T E N T S PAGE Presentation by Jay Hakes 6 Presentation by Yvonne Bishop 34 Presentation by Art Rypinski 43 Presentation by Richard A. Lockhart 61 Presentation by Douglas Hale 84

106

Clallam County PUD- Residential Efficiency Rebate Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Clallam County PUD offers a variety of rebates for residential customers for energy efficiency improvements. Eligible measures and incentives include window upgrades, insulation, air and duct...

107

"1. Mohave","Gas","Southern California Edison Co",1580 "2. Clark...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Nevada" "1. Mohave","Gas","Southern California Edison Co",1580 "2. Clark","Gas","Nevada Power Co",1138 "3. Chuck Lenzie Generating Station","Gas","Nevada Power Co",1128 "4....

108

Dorchester County- Renewable Zoning  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Dorchester County zoning codes specifically permit solar arrays and small wind turbines in many zoning districts.

109

Early Cook County Roads -- Part One  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

One One Nature Bulletin No. 738 January 11, 1964 Forest Preserve District of Cook County Seymour Simon, President Roberts Mann, Conservation Editor EARLY COOK COUNTY ROADS -- PARK ONE When Chicago was incorporated as a village in 1833 it was only a squalid hamlet of about 350 inhabitants and appeared to be so poorly situated that it was hopeless -- "crude cabins and flimsy shacks in a chaos of mud, rubbish and confusion. " Only a few feet above the level of Lake Michigan, the place was almost entirely surrounded by swamps and miles and miles of prairies that became nearly impassable after spring thaws and during periods of heavy rainfall. There were only two important routes that afforded access at all times. One was the Green Bay Trail, ancestor of North Clark St. in Chicago, Ridge Ave. in Evanston, and Green Bay Road north of that. The other, traveled by the soldiers coming from Detroit to build Fort Dearborn in 1803, used the Great Sauk Trail to La Porte, Indiana, then a trail northwesterly to what is now Michigan City, and the firm sands of the lake beach the rest of the way.

110

Mono County geothermal activity  

SciTech Connect

Three geothermal projects have been proposed or are underway in Mono County, California. The Mammoth/Chance geothermal development project plans to construct a 10-MW geothermal binary power plant which will include 8 production and 3 injection wells. Pacific Lighting Energy Systems is also planning a 10-MW binary power plant consisting of 5 geothermal wells and up to 4 injection wells. A geothermal research project near Mammoth Lakes has spudded a well to provide a way to periodically measure temperature gradient, pressure, and chemistry of the thermal waters and to investigate the space-heating potential of the area in the vicinity of Mammoth Lakes. All three projects are briefly described.

Lyster, D.L.

1986-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

111

San Bernardino County - Green Building Requirement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Bernardino County - Green Building Requirement Bernardino County - Green Building Requirement San Bernardino County - Green Building Requirement < Back Eligibility Local Government Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Program Info State California Program Type Energy Standards for Public Buildings In August 2007, the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors approved a policy requiring that all new county buildings and major renovations be built to LEED Silver standards. The decision was part of the Green County San Bernardino project, which also includes incentives to encourage residents, builders, and businesses to adopt more sustainable practices. Source http://www.dsireusa.org/incentives/incentive.cfm?Incentive_Code=CA73R

112

Microsoft PowerPoint - Clark Atlanta DOE MEI Small Business presentation August 2009 for pdf.ppt [Compatibility Mode]  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CLARK ATLANTA UNIVERSITY CLARK ATLANTA UNIVERSITY CLARK ATLANTA UNIVERSITY Presentation at the Presentation at the CLARK ATLANTA UNIVERSITY CLARK ATLANTA UNIVERSITY Presentation at the Presentation at the 10 10 th th Annual DOE MEI Small Business Conference Annual DOE MEI Small Business Conference CAU's Energy Related Research Capabilities CAU's Energy Related Research Capabilities 10 10 th th Annual DOE MEI Small Business Conference Annual DOE MEI Small Business Conference CAU's Energy Related Research Capabilities CAU's Energy Related Research Capabilities Ishrat M Khan Ph.D. Ishrat M Khan Ph.D. Ishrat M Khan Ph.D. Ishrat M Khan Ph.D. Director, Center for Functional Director, Center for Functional Nanoscale Nanoscale Materials Materials ikhan@cau.edu ikhan@cau.edu www cau edu/research www

113

Balance : Lancaster County's tragedy  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Lancaster County, Pennsylvania residents are proud of their agricultural heritage. They do not want to see their farmland disappear. But the County continues to be developed into residential subdivisions. This thesis ...

Gingrich, Valerie (Valerie J.)

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

114

Carroll County- Wind Ordinance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This ordinance sets forth regulations for the zoning, erection, and operation of small wind energy systems in Carroll County, Maryland.

115

Kent County- Wind Ordinance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This ordinance establishes provisions and standards for small wind energy systems in various zoning districts in Kent County, Maryland.

116

Kiowa County Commons Building  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This poster describes the energy efficiency features and sustainable materials used in the Kiowa County Commons Building in Greensburg, Kansas.

117

the university of maryland the magazine of the a. james clark school of engineering  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

:· affordable systems for capturing solar thermal energy and converting it into electricity. See related story 26 students + alumni University Earns Coveted Spot in 2011 Solar Decathlon Clark School Baja and how to maximize this region's unique funding resources. With their help, TRX Systems developed from

Shapiro, Benjamin

118

Simulation of the Buxton-Clarke Model for Organic Photovoltaic Cells  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Simulation of the Buxton-Clarke Model for Organic Photovoltaic Cells J.W. Jerome Department 02912 USA Abstract--Modeling of organic photovoltaic (OPV) cells can be achieved by adaptation of drift-V curves and carrier current densities. I. INTRODUCTION Organic solar cells are the topic of extensive

Jerome, Joseph W.

119

071 An LTCC Clark-Type Oxygen Sensor - Programmaster.org  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Clark-type oxygen sensors are electrochemical devices consisting an oxygen- permeable ... 030 Tricalcium Phosphate System in Drug Delivery and Bone Graft ... 039 Effect of % Boron on the Tribological Performance of Alumina Matrix ... 094 Isotopic Enrichment Studies to Determine Elemental Diffusion Profiles Through an...

120

Window of Opportunity: The Climatic Conditions of the Lewis and Clark Expedition of 18041806  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Lewis and Clark's entry into to the American West in search of an inland Northwest Passage is considered among the greatest expeditions in American history. The Corps of Discovery were also lucky as their travels west of the 100th meridian ...

Paul A. Knapp

2004-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "including clark county" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Volume 1, Issue 6 While conducting research in Indonesia, Associate Professor Amanda Clarke  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Volume 1, Issue 6 While conducting research in Indonesia, Associate Professor Amanda Clarke, Indonesia that suddenly erupted on May 29, 2006. The world's fastest growing mud volcano was dubbed LUSI drama Mud Max that explores the impacts of natural disasters in Indonesia with a special emphasis

Shumway, John

122

Imperial County geothermal development annual meeting: summary  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

All phases of current geothermal development in Imperial County are discussed and future plans for development are reviewed. Topics covered include: Heber status update, Heber binary project, direct geothermal use for high-fructose corn sweetener production, update on county planning activities, Brawley and Salton Sea facility status, status of Imperial County projects, status of South Brawley Prospect 1983, Niland geothermal energy program, recent and pending changes in federal procedures/organizations, plant indicators of geothermal fluid on East Mesa, state lands activities in Imperial County, environmental interests in Imperial County, offshore exploration, strategic metals in geothermal fluids rebuilding of East Mesa Power Plant, direct use geothermal potential for Calipatria industrial Park, the Audubon Society case, status report of the Cerro Prieto geothermal field, East Brawley Prospect, and precision gravity survey at Heber and Cerro Prieto geothermal fields. (MHR)

Not Available

1983-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

123

Effects of rainbow trout fry of a metals-contaminated diet of benthic invertebrates from the Clark Fork River, Montana  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The upper Clark Fork River in northwestern Montana has received mining wastes from the Butte and Anaconda areas since 1880. These wastes have contaminated areas of the river bed and floodplain with tailings and heavy metal sludge, resulting in elevated concentration of metals in surface water, sediments, and biota. Rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss were exposed immediately after hatching for 91 d to cadmium, copper, lead, and zinc in water at concentrations simulating those in Clark Fork River. From exogenous feeding (21 d posthatch) through 91 d, fry were also fed benthic invertebrates from the Clark Fork River that contained elevated concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, copper, and lead. Evaluations of different combinations of diet and water exposure indicated diet-borne metals were more important than water-borne metals - at the concentrations we tested - in reducing survival and growth of rainbow trout. Whole-body metal concentrations ([mu]g/g, wet weight) at 91 d in fish fed Clark Fork invertebrates without exposure to Clark Fork water were arsenic, 1.4; cadmium, 0.16; and copper, 6.7. These were similar to concentrations found in Clark Fork River fishes. Livers from fish on the high-metals diets exhibited degenerative changes and generally lacked glycogen vacuolation. Indigenous Clark Fork River invertebrates provide a concentrated source of metals for accumulation into young fishes, and probably were the cause of decreased survival and growth of age-0 rainbow trout in our laboratory exposures. 30 refs., 8 figs., 4 tabs.

Woodward, D.F. (National Fisheries Contaminant Research Center, Jackson, WY (United States)); Brumbaugh, W.G.; DeLonay, A.J.; Little, E.E. (National Fisheries Contaminant Research Center, Columbia, MO (United States)); Smith, C.E. (Bozeman Fish Technology Center, MT (United States))

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

124

counties - more challenges | Data.gov  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

- more challenges Counties Data Apps Challenges Policies Counties You are here Data.gov Communities Counties Challenge.gov...

125

Los Angeles County - LEED for County Buildings | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Los Angeles County - LEED for County Buildings Los Angeles County - LEED for County Buildings Los Angeles County - LEED for County Buildings < Back Eligibility Local Government Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Bioenergy Solar Lighting Windows, Doors, & Skylights Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Heating Buying & Making Electricity Water Heating Wind Program Info State California Program Type Energy Standards for Public Buildings Provider Los Angeles County In January 2007, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors adopted rules to require that all new county buildings greater than 10,000 square feet be LEED Silver certified. All buildings authorized and fully funded on or

126

Hyde County - Wind Energy Facility Ordinance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hyde County - Wind Energy Facility Ordinance Hyde County - Wind Energy Facility Ordinance Hyde County - Wind Energy Facility Ordinance < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Industrial Institutional Local Government Multi-Family Residential Nonprofit Residential Schools State Government Tribal Government Utility Savings Category Wind Buying & Making Electricity Program Info State North Carolina Program Type Solar/Wind Permitting Standards Provider Hyde County Hyde County, located in eastern North Carolina, adopted a wind ordinance in 2008 to regulate the use of wind energy facilities throughout the county, including waters within the boundaries of Hyde County. The ordinance is substantially similar to the [http://www.dsireusa.org/library/includes/incentive2.cfm?Incentive_Code=N... model wind ordinance] drafted by the North Carolina Wind Working Group, and

127

Category:Counties | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Counties Counties Jump to: navigation, search This category contains all counties in the United States of America. Contents: Top - 0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Pages in category "Counties" The following 200 pages are in this category, out of 3,142 total. (previous 200) (next 200) A Abbeville County, South Carolina Acadia Parish, Louisiana Accomack County, Virginia Ada County, Idaho Adair County, Iowa Adair County, Kentucky Adair County, Missouri Adair County, Oklahoma Adams County, Colorado Adams County, Idaho Adams County, Illinois Adams County, Indiana Adams County, Iowa Adams County, Mississippi Adams County, Nebraska Adams County, North Dakota Adams County, Ohio Adams County, Pennsylvania Adams County, Washington Adams County, Wisconsin

128

Geothermal development plan: Pima County  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Pima County Area Development evaluated the county-wide market potential for utilizing geothermal energy. The study identified four potential geothermal resource areas with temperatures less than 100{sup 0}C (212{sup 0}F), and in addition, one area is identified as having a temperature of 147{sup 0}F (297{sup 0}F). Geothermal resources are found to occur in Tucson where average population growth rates of two to three percent per year are expected over the next 40 years. Rapid growth in the manufacturing sector and the existence of major copper mines provide opportunities for the direct utilization of geothermal energy. However, available water supplies are identified as a major constraint to projected growth. The study also includes a regional energy analysis, future predictions for energy consumption and energy prices. A major section of the report is aimed at identifying potential geothermal users in Pima County and providing projections of maximum economic geothermal utilization. The study identifies 115 firms in 32 industrial classes that have some potential for geothermal use. In addition, 26 agribusiness firms were found in the county.

White, D.H.; Goldstone, L.A.

1982-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

129

Wicomico County- Wind Ordinance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Establishes zoning regulations for the installation and construction of small wind energy systems in Wicomico County for private landowners, subject to reasonable restrictions.

130

Washington County- Wind Ordinance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This ordinance establishes regulations to facilitate the installation and construction of Small Wind Energy Systems in Washington County for private landowners, subject to reasonable restrictions...

131

Montgomery County Public Schools  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) is the largest school district in the state of Maryland and the 16th-largest school district in the nation. ...

2011-04-19T23:59:59.000Z

132

a J. C. Clarke, Contract FEOM 8 J. P. Morgan, Assist tor, Pznduction Division  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

J. C. Clarke, Contract J. C. Clarke, Contract FEOM 8 J. P. Morgan, Assist tor, Pznduction Division SUBJECT: CONTRACT PROPCX3AL OF r) ELECTRO MXTALLURGICAL DIVISION SYMBOL: PADtJPM UNION CARBIDE & CAFLBON CORPORATION i' .:' CONTRACT NO. W-7405 EN&14 4. . A; BACKGROUND 18 The vacuum casting facilities at the Electra ~etallnrgical Division at Niagara Falls, New York, currently in standby, are needed for the vacuum casting of slrconium sponge to ingot for subsequent con- version to zirconium shapes for the Naval Critical hequiremento . The program has been approved by the &shington Division of heactor Development through the Washington Production Division, Monies are available from operations budget for FY 1950 and FY 1951 under the Titanium Alloy Manufacturing Division of National &ad Company

133

San Diego County - Design Standards for County Facilities | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Design Standards for County Facilities Design Standards for County Facilities San Diego County - Design Standards for County Facilities < Back Eligibility Local Government Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Bioenergy Manufacturing Buying & Making Electricity Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Energy Sources Solar Wind Other Program Info State California Program Type Energy Standards for Public Buildings Provider San Diego County The San Diego County Board of Supervisors established design standards for county facilities and property. Among other requirements, the policy requires that all new county buildings or major building renovations obtain U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) LEED Building Certification.

134

Forest County Potawatomi Community Project | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Forest County Potawatomi Community Project Forest County Potawatomi Community Project Forest County Potawatomi Community Project November 13, 2013 - 10:45am Addthis The Forest County Potawatomi Community, a federally recognized tribe with its reservation in Forest County, Wisconsin, and with trust lands in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, is implementing an integrated renewable energy deployment plan that will provide electricity for the Tribe's government buildings. The U.S. Department of Energy provided $2.6 million in funding for this Community Renewable Energy Deployment (CommRE) project. Biogas Generation Facility The Forest County Potawatomi CommRE project will include installation of a biogas generation plant on Tribe-owned land in Milwaukee County. The digesters associated with the biogas cogeneration plant will utilize a

135

Harris County - LEED Requirement for County Buildings | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Harris County - LEED Requirement for County Buildings Harris County - LEED Requirement for County Buildings Harris County - LEED Requirement for County Buildings < Back Eligibility Local Government Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Program Info State Texas Program Type Energy Standards for Public Buildings Provider Harris County In 2009, the Harris County Commissioners Court approved a measure that requires all new county buildings to meet minimum LEED certification standards. Buildings do not have to register with the the U.S. Green Building Council. The Harris County Facilities and Property Management (FPM) Division also requires all county buildings to meet minimum energy efficiency and sustainability measures, as described in the

136

Frederick County- Green Building Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Frederick County administers a green building program. It has two goals: (1) to ensure that County building projects implement strategies that enhance environmental performance and fiscal...

137

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

savingscity-water-light-and-power-commercial-energy-efficiency-rebate-programs Rebate Clark County REMC- Clark County REMC- Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program Clark...

138

Environmental assessment, Deaf Smith County site, Texas  

SciTech Connect

The Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 USC sections 10101-10226) requires the environmental assessment of a proposed site to include a statement of the basis for nominating a site as suitable for characterization. Volume 2 provides a detailed statement evaluating the site suitability of the Deaf Smith County Site under DOE siting guidelines, as well as a comparison of the Deaf Smith County Site to the other sites under consideration. The evaluation of the Deaf Smith County Site is based on the impacts associated with the reference repository design, but the evaluation will not change if based on the Mission Plan repository concept. The second part of this document compares the Deaf Smith County Site to Davis Canyon, Hanford, Richton Dome and Yucca Mountain. This comparison is required under DOE guidelines and is not intended to directly support subsequent recommendation of three sites for characterization as candidate sites. 259 refs., 29 figs., 66 refs. (MHB)

Not Available

1986-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

139

Regional Lead Agents and County Coordinators 2011 RESPONSIBILITY NAME COUNTY  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Coordinator Jay Crouch Newberry County Coordinator Vicky Bertagnolli Aiken REGION 8 Regional Lead Karissa

Bolding, M. Chad

140

King County - Green Building Initiative (Washington) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

King County - Green Building Initiative (Washington) King County - Green Building Initiative (Washington) King County - Green Building Initiative (Washington) < Back Eligibility Local Government Savings Category Appliances & Electronics Commercial Lighting Lighting Program Info State District of Columbia Program Type Energy Standards for Public Buildings Provider King County Solid Waste Division The King County Green Building Initiative started in 2001, and was included in the King Code Code with the Green Building and Sustainable Development Ordinance in 2008. The ordinance requires that all county-owned facilities and financial capital projects be built to LEED Gold standards, including new construction, major renovations, and projects using alternative funding. Major renovations are defined in the statutes as work that affects

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "including clark county" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Suffolk County - LEED Program for County Construction | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Suffolk County - LEED Program for County Construction Suffolk County - LEED Program for County Construction Suffolk County - LEED Program for County Construction < Back Eligibility Local Government Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Program Info State New York Program Type Energy Standards for Public Buildings Provider Suffolk County In 2006, the Suffolk County Legislature enacted Resolution No. 126-2006, creating the Leadership in Energy and Environment Design (LEED) Program for county construction projects. The program requirements were revised in 2008 (Resolution No. 551-2008), and again in 2011 (Resolution No. 458-2011). The program requires the County Department of Public Works to apply the LEED

142

Property:County | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County County Jump to: navigation, search Property Name County Property Type String Description County Name Pages using the property "County" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) A Akutan Geothermal Project + Aleutians East Borough, AK + Alligator Geothermal Geothermal Project + White Pine County, NV + Alum Geothermal Project + Esmerelda County, NV + Aurora Geothermal Project + Mineral County, NV + B Bald Mountain Geothermal Project + Lassen County, CA + Baltazor Springs Geothermal Project + Humboldt County, NV + Barren Hills Geothermal Project + Lyon, NV + Black Rock I Geothermal Project + Imperial County, OR + Black Rock II Geothermal Project + Imperial County, CA + Black Rock III Geothermal Project + Imperial County, CA +

143

Coyotes in Cook County  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Coyotes in Cook County Coyotes in Cook County Nature Bulletin No. 2 Forest Preserve District of Cook County -- July 31, 1969 George W. Dunne, President Roland F. Eisenbeis, Superintendent of Conversation COYOTES IN COOK COUNTY One winter night, a Forest Preserve Ranger heard the yapping howl of some animal that made his hair stand on end. A few days later, a farmer in the Sag valley saw what appeared to be a wolf lope across a road. Finally, the ranger, concealed within sight of a faint path apparently used by wild dogs or foxes, shot a coyote. The little bunch of black bristles at the base of its tail, covering a scent gland beneath the skin identified it as being of the wolf family. The animal was sent to the Illinois Natural History Survey, at Urbana, where it was pronounced to be a prairie wolf (also known as the "brush" wolf). In the west it is generally known by its Spanish name: coyote.

144

County Wind Ordinance Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

[http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/asm/ab_0001-0050/ab_45_bill_200... Assembly Bill 45] of 2009 authorized counties to adopt ordinances to provide for the installation of small wind systems ...

145

Caroline County- Wind Ordinance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This ordinance amends Chapter 175 of the Code of Public Local Laws of Caroline County, Maryland to provide for the erection, maintenance, and operation of small wind energy systems, as well as...

146

RECIPIENT:Placer County  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MANAGEMENfCENTER .. NEAnE:'l'ERlVIIN).'I:rQ1"l PROJECT TITLE: Placer County Biomass Utilization Pilot Project Page 1 of2 . .. . W STATE:CA Funding Opportunity...

147

Imperial County geothermal development. Quarterly report, October 1-December 31, 1983  

SciTech Connect

The highlights of geothermal development in Imperial County during October, November, and December 1983 are discussed. Topics include the status of geothermal development projects in the County, geothermal staff activities and research projects, and other geothermal-related topics.

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

148

Imperial County geothermal development quarterly report, July 1-September 30, 1983  

SciTech Connect

The highlights of geothermal development in Imperial County during July, August, and September 1983 are discussed. Topics include the status of geothermal development projects in the county, geothermal staff activities and research projects, and other geothermal-related topics.

1983-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

149

Appendix F Cultural Resources, Including  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Appendix F Appendix F Cultural Resources, Including Section 106 Consultation STATE OF CALIFORNIA - THE RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., Governor OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION 1725 23 rd Street, Suite 100 SACRAMENTO, CA 95816-7100 (916) 445-7000 Fax: (916) 445-7053 calshpo@parks.ca.gov www.ohp.parks.ca.gov June 14, 2011 Reply in Reference To: DOE110407A Angela Colamaria Loan Programs Office Environmental Compliance Division Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave SW, LP-10 Washington, DC 20585 Re: Topaz Solar Farm, San Luis Obispo County, California Dear Ms. Colamaria: Thank you for seeking my consultation regarding the above noted undertaking. Pursuant to 36 CFR Part 800 (as amended 8-05-04) regulations implementing Section

150

The Committee met in the Clark Room in the Holiday Inn Capitol,  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

FRIDAY FRIDAY APRIL 24, 1998 - - - The Committee met in the Clark Room in the Holiday Inn Capitol, 550 C Street, S.W., Washington, D.C., at 9:00 a.m., Daniel Relles, Chair, presiding. PRESENT: DANIEL RELLES Chair CHARLES BISCHOFF Member CAROL CRAWFORD Member CALVIN KENT Member GRETA M. LJUNG Member POLLY PHIPPS Member SEYMOUR SUDMAN Member ROY WHITMORE Member JAMES HAMMITT Guest I N D E X Page Opening Comments from the Chair 3 Recognizing Previous Judges of the EIA Graphics 4 Contest and Announcing Winners, Jay Hakes EIA Survey Issues: Addressing Declining Budgets 12 Dwight French (EIA) Discussion: Seymour Sudman (ASA) 36 Questions from the Committee 45

151

San Bernardino County - Green Building Incentive | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

You are here You are here Home » San Bernardino County - Green Building Incentive San Bernardino County - Green Building Incentive < Back Eligibility Commercial Construction Installer/Contractor Residential Savings Category Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Cooling Heating Heat Pumps Appliances & Electronics Water Heating Bioenergy Home Weatherization Commercial Weatherization Solar Lighting Windows, Doors, & Skylights Buying & Making Electricity Water Wind Program Info State California Program Type Green Building Incentive San Bernardino's Board of Supervisors launched Green County San Bernardino in August 2007. The program includes a number of incentives to encourage residents, builders, and businesses to adopt more sustainable practices. Builders who participate in San Bernardino County's

152

Property:FIPS County Code | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

FIPS County Code FIPS County Code Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. Pages using the property "FIPS County Code" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) A Abbeville County, South Carolina + 001 + Acadia Parish, Louisiana + 001 + Accomack County, Virginia + 001 + Ada County, Idaho + 001 + Adair County, Iowa + 001 + Adair County, Kentucky + 001 + Adair County, Missouri + 001 + Adair County, Oklahoma + 001 + Adams County, Colorado + 001 + Adams County, Idaho + 003 + Adams County, Illinois + 001 + Adams County, Indiana + 001 + Adams County, Iowa + 003 + Adams County, Mississippi + 001 + Adams County, Nebraska + 001 + Adams County, North Dakota + 001 + Adams County, Ohio + 001 + Adams County, Pennsylvania + 001 +

153

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Sonoma County  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

County on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Sonoma County on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Sonoma County on Delicious Rank Better...

154

Books and book chapters (last 10 years only) 16. Clark, E. Ann. 2009. Ch. 5 (invited). Forages in Organic Crop-Livestock Systems. pp. 85-  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Books and book chapters (last 10 years only) 16. Clark, E. Ann. 2009. Ch. 5 (invited). Forages, Agriculture, and Engineering Service, Cooperative Extension, Ithaca, N.Y. (Peer-reviewed book chapter) 12 Service, Cooperative Extension, Ithaca, N.Y. (Peer-reviewed book chapter) 11. Clark, E. Ann. 2004 . GM

Clark, E. Ann

155

MINERAL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Board of Board of MINERAL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Telephone: 702-945-2446 Fax: 702-945-0706 P.O. Box 4150 Hawthorne, Nevada 89415 JACKIE WALLIS, Chairman GOVERNING BOARD FOR THE TOWNS OF DAN DILLARD, Vice Chairman HAWTHORNE, LUNING AND MINA BOB LYBARGER, Member LIQUOR BOARD GAMING BOARD U.S. Department of Energy Office of General Counsel, GC-52 1000 Independence Ave. S.W. Washington, DC 20585 Dear Sirs: Attached are the comments for modification of the Price-Anderson Act Notice of Inquiry(NOI) provided to the Board of Mineral County Commissioners, in a letter dated January

156

Geothermal development plan: Pinal County  

SciTech Connect

The Pinal County Area Development Plan evaluated the county-wide market potential for utilizing geothermal energy. The study identified three suspected geothermal resource areas with potential 70/sup 0/C (158/sup 0/F) temperatures. In addition, one geothermal test well near Coolidge encountered bottom hole temperatures of 120/sup 0/C (248/sup 0/F) at a depth of 2440 m (8005 ft) and produced 18.3 l/sec (290 gpm). Geothermal resources are found to occur near population centers where average growth rates of 1.5% to 2% per year are expected over the next 40 years. Mining, agriculture and manufacturing are all important sectors of the regional economy and provide opportunities for direct utilization of geothermal energy. A regional energy use analysis includes energy use projections and regional energy price information. Agriculture accounts for 95% of the annual water consumption and predicted decreases in water availability will result in less future agricultural activity. The analysis contains a detailed section matching geothermal resources to potential industrial users. Fourteen firms in 10 industrial classes were identified as having some potential for geothermal energy use. In addition, 25 agricultural firms were identified as having some potential for geothermal use, including the prepared feeds industry.

White, D.H.; Goldstone, L.A.

1982-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

157

Arlington County - Green Building Incentive Program | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Administration Other Agencies You are here Home Savings Arlington County - Green Building Incentive Program Arlington County - Green Building Incentive Program...

158

Perturbation Growth at the Convective Scale G. Leoncini, R. S. Plant, S. L. Gray and P. A. Clark  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Perturbation Growth at the Convective Scale G. Leoncini, R. S. Plant, S. L. Gray and P. A. Clark. Improvements in computational power mean that operational weather prediction models can now be run growth at the convective scale in response to model-state perturbations and to determine

Plant, Robert

159

EIS-0441: Mohave County Wind Farm Project, Mohave County, Arizona |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

41: Mohave County Wind Farm Project, Mohave County, Arizona 41: Mohave County Wind Farm Project, Mohave County, Arizona EIS-0441: Mohave County Wind Farm Project, Mohave County, Arizona Summary This EIS, prepared by the Bureau of Land Management with DOE's Western Area Power Administration as a cooperating agency, evaluated the environmental impacts of a proposed wind energy project on public lands in Mohave County, Arizona. Power generated by this project would tie to the electrical power grid through an interconnection to one of Western's transmission lines.The project website is http://www.blm.gov/az/st/en/prog/energy/wind/mohave.html. Public Comment Opportunities None available at this time. Documents Available for Download Draft EIS posted at http://www.blm.gov/az/st/en/prog/energy/wind/mohave/reports/DEIS.html.

160

Santa Clara County - Green Building Policy for County Government Buildings  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Green Building Policy for County Government Green Building Policy for County Government Buildings Santa Clara County - Green Building Policy for County Government Buildings < Back Eligibility Local Government Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Solar Buying & Making Electricity Water Heating Program Info State California Program Type Energy Standards for Public Buildings Provider Santa Clara County Executive's Office In February 2006, the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors approved a Green Building Policy for all county-owned or leased buildings. The standards were revised again in September 2009. All new buildings over 5,000 square feet are required to meet LEED Silver

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "including clark county" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

The Committee convened in the Clark Room of the Holiday Inn  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

- - - - - - - - - - COMMITTEE ON ENERGY STATISTICS - - - - - MEETING - - - - - FRIDAY, APRIL 26, 1996 The Committee convened in the Clark Room of the Holiday Inn Capitol, 550 C Street, S.W., Washington, D.C., at 9:00 a.m., DR. TIMOTHY D. MOUNT, Chair, presiding. PRESENT: TIMOTHY D. MOUNT, Chair SAMPRIT CHATTERJEE BRENDA G. COX JOHN D. GRACE CALVIN KENT GRETA M. LJUNG RICHARD A. LOCKHART DANIEL A. RELLES BRADLEY O. SKARPNESS G. CAMPBELL WATKINS ALSO PRESENT: RENEE MILLER YVONNE M. BISHOP DIANE LIQUE L.A. PETTIS JAY HAKES JOHN WOOD GORDON M. KAUFMAN ROY KASS NANCY LEACH I-N-D-E-X Introductory Remarks: Announcement of Winners of the Contest on Graphs and Visuals Displays 3 Restructuring the Oil and Gas Crude Reserves Program (Agenda Item 5) Presenter: John Wood, Office of Oil and Gas 8

162

The Committee met in the Clark Room, Holiday Inn Capitol at 550  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

PUBLIC MEETING + + + THURSDAY, APRIL 10, 1997 + + + The Committee met in the Clark Room, Holiday Inn Capitol at 550 C Street, S.W., Washington, D.C., at 9:00 a.m., G. Campbell Watkins, Chairman, presiding. PRESENT: G. CAMPBELL WATKINS, Chairman DAVID R. BELLHOUSE CHARLES W. BISCHOFF BRENDA G. COX CAROL A. GOTWAY CRAWFORD CALVIN KENT GRETA M. LJUNG DANIEL A. RELLES BRADLEY O. SKARPNESS PRESENT (Continued): ROY WHITMORE C O N T E N T S PAGE Opening Remarks, Lynda Carlson 10 Update on 1997 Residential Energy Consumption Survey, Mike Laurence 16 The Use of a Variant of Poisson Sampling: Paula Weir 58, 85 David Bellhouse 72 Roy Whitmore 79 Presentation by Administrator Jay Hakes 112 Results of Customer Satisfaction Survey, Colleen Blessing 138 Annual Energy Outlook/Short-term Energy

163

Geothermal development plan: northern Arizona counties  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Northern Counties Area Development Plan evaluated the regional market potential for utilizing geothermal energy. This study identified five potential geothermal resource areas, four of which have low temperature (<90{sup 0}C, 194{sup 0}F) potential and one possible igneous system. The average population growth rate in the Northern Counties is expected to be five percent per year over the next 40 years, with Mohave and Yavapai Counties growing the fastest. Rapid growth is anticipated in all major employment sectors, including trade, service, manufacturing, mining and utilities. A regional energy use analysis is included, containing information on current energy use patterns for all user classes. Water supplies are expected to be adequate for expected growth generally, though Yavapai and Gila Counties will experience water deficiencies. A preliminary district heating analysis is included for the towns of Alpine and Springerville. Both communities are believed located on geothermal resource sites. The study also contains a section identifying potential geothermal resource users in northern Arizona.

White, D.H.; Goldstone, L.A.

1982-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

164

Property:Building/County | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County County Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type Page. County Pages using the property "Building/County" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) S Sweden Building 05K0001 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0002 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0003 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0004 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0005 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0006 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0007 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0008 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0009 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0010 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0011 + Stockholm County, Sweden +

165

Hydrogeologic investigation of Coso Hot Springs, Inyo County, California.  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Hydrogeologic investigation of Coso Hot Springs, Inyo County, California. Hydrogeologic investigation of Coso Hot Springs, Inyo County, California. Final report October 1977--January 1978 Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Report: Hydrogeologic investigation of Coso Hot Springs, Inyo County, California. Final report October 1977--January 1978 Details Activities (2) Areas (1) Regions (0) Abstract: This investigation included: review of existing geologic, geophysical, and hydrologic information; field examination of geologic rock units and springs and other features of hydrologic significance and sampling of waters for chemical analysis; determination of the local Coso Hot Springs and regional groundwater hydrology, including consideration of recharge, discharge, movement, and water quality; and determination of the

166

Cowlitz County PUD- Residential Energy Efficient Appliance Rebate Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Cowlitz County PUD offers the EnergySHARE Plus appliance rebate program to its residential customers. Rebates are offered for Energy Star clothes washers, refrigerators and freezers (including the...

167

Soybean Variety Evaluation Tests  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and Extension Center, Warsaw James Bowen, Producer, Beauregard Farms, Culpeper County Bobby Clark, County Agent

Liskiewicz, Maciej

168

EIS-0427: Grapevine Canyon Wind Project, Coconino County, Arizona |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

27: Grapevine Canyon Wind Project, Coconino County, Arizona 27: Grapevine Canyon Wind Project, Coconino County, Arizona EIS-0427: Grapevine Canyon Wind Project, Coconino County, Arizona Summary This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts of a proposed wind energy generation project in Coconino County, Arizona, on privately owned ranch lands and trust lands administered by the Arizona State Land Department. The proposed project includes a new transmission tie-line that would cross lands administered by Coconino National Forest and interconnect with DOE's Western Area Power Administration's existing Glen Canyon-Pinnacle Peak transmission lines. Public Comment Opportunities No public comment opportunities available at this time. Documents Available for Download September 11, 2012 EIS-0427: Record of Decision Interconnection of the Grapevine Canyon Wind Project, Coconino County,

169

Tyrrell County - Wind Energy Facility Ordinance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Tyrrell County - Wind Energy Facility Ordinance Tyrrell County - Wind Energy Facility Ordinance Tyrrell County - Wind Energy Facility Ordinance < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Industrial Institutional Local Government Multi-Family Residential Nonprofit Residential Schools State Government Tribal Government Utility Savings Category Wind Buying & Making Electricity Program Info State North Carolina Program Type Solar/Wind Permitting Standards Tyrrell County, located in northeastern North Carolina, adopted a wind ordinance in 2009 to regulate the use of wind energy facilities in the unincorporated areas of the county. The ordinance is substantially similar to the [http://www.dsireusa.org/library/includes/incentive2.cfm?Incentive_Code=N... model wind ordinance] drafted by the North Carolina Wind Working Group, and

170

Four-County EMC - Residential Energy Efficiency Appliance Rebate Program |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Four-County EMC - Residential Energy Efficiency Appliance Rebate Four-County EMC - Residential Energy Efficiency Appliance Rebate Program Four-County EMC - Residential Energy Efficiency Appliance Rebate Program < Back Eligibility Residential Savings Category Appliances & Electronics Program Info State North Carolina Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount Clothes Washer: $50 Dishwasher: $50 Refrigerator: $50 Freezer: $50 Refrigerator/Freezer Recycling: $50 Provider Four County EMC Four-County EMC offers its customers $50 rebates for purchasing certain Energy Star appliances. Eligible appliances include refrigerators, dishwashers, clothes washers and freezers. The rebates are available to residential customers who are replacing older appliances or buying new appliances for the first time. In order to qualify for the rebate, Energy

171

Inter-County Energy Efficiency Program (Kentucky) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Inter-County Energy Efficiency Program (Kentucky) Inter-County Energy Efficiency Program (Kentucky) Inter-County Energy Efficiency Program (Kentucky) < Back Eligibility Multi-Family Residential Residential Savings Category Home Weatherization Commercial Weatherization Sealing Your Home Ventilation Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Heating Heat Pumps Program Info State Kentucky Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount Heat Pump Retrofit: $500-$1,000 Weatherization: $520-$1,370 Electric Thermal Storage: 40% discounted rate on energy usage of installed ETS heater Provider Inter-County Energy Cooperative Inter-County Energy Cooperative offers several energy efficiency and demand-side management programs for residential customers. Incentives are available for heat pumps (including geothermal, air source, and mini-split

172

Cowlitz County PUD - Residential Energy Efficient Appliance Rebate Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cowlitz County PUD - Residential Energy Efficient Appliance Rebate Cowlitz County PUD - Residential Energy Efficient Appliance Rebate Program Cowlitz County PUD - Residential Energy Efficient Appliance Rebate Program < Back Eligibility Residential Savings Category Appliances & Electronics Water Heating Program Info State District of Columbia Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount Refrigerator/Freezer: $25 Refrigerator/Freezer Recycling: $30 Clothes Washer: $30 - $70 Water Heater: $25 - $70 Provider Cowlitz County Public Utility District Cowlitz County PUD offers the EnergySHARE Plus appliance rebate program to its residential customers. Rebates are offered for Energy Star clothes washers, refrigerators and freezers (including the proper recycling of old units), and energy efficient water heaters. Rebates range from $25 - $70.

173

Clean Cities: Western Riverside County Clean Cities coalition  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (EERE)

Riverside County Clean Cities Coalition Riverside County Clean Cities Coalition The Western Riverside County Clean Cities coalition works with vehicle fleets, fuel providers, community leaders, and other stakeholders to reduce petroleum use in transportation. Western Riverside County Clean Cities coalition Contact Information Jennifer DiCiano 951-955-8587 diciano@wrcog.cog.ca.us Coalition Website Clean Cities Coordinator Jennifer DiCiano Photo of Jennifer DiCiano Jennifer DiCiano, coordinator for the Western Riverside County Clean Cities Coalition, has been with Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) since 2007. Ms. DiCiano has more than 20 years' experience in local government implementing various environmental programs including; Indoor Air Quality, Solid Waste Reduction, Reduction of Petroleum Usage and

174

Morris County Improvement Authority, Morris County, New Jersey Renewable Energy Initiative  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Morris County Improvement Authority (?Authority?), a public body corporate and politic of the State of New Jersey and created and controlled by the County, at the direction of the County and through the Program guaranteed by the County, financed 3.2 MW of solar projects (?Solar Projects?) at fifteen (15) sites for seven (7) local government units (?Local Units?) in and including the County. The Program uses a Power Purchase Agreement (?PPA?) structure, where the Solar Developer constructs, operates and maintains all of the Solar Projects, for the benefit of the Local Units and the Authority, for the maximum State law allowable PPA period of fifteen (15) years. Although all fifteen (15) sites were funded by the Authority, only the Mennen Arena site was considered for the purposes of the required local match funding for this grant. Specifically at the Mennen Arena site, the Authority financed 1.6 MW of solar panels. On October 18, 2013, the DOE Grant was drawn down following completion of the necessary application documents and final execution of an agreement memorializing the contemplated transaction by the Local Units, the County, The Authority and the solar developer. The proceeds of the DOE Grant were then applied to reduce the PPA price to all Local Units across the program and increase the savings from approximately 1/3 to almost half off the existing and forecasted utility pricing over the fifteen (15) year term, without adversely affecting all of the other benefits. With the application of the rate buy down, the price of electricity purchased under the PPA dropped from 10.9 to 7.7 cents/kWh. This made acquisition of renewable energy much more affordable for the Local Units, and it enhanced the success of the program, which will encourage other counties and local units to develop similar programs.

Bonanni, John [Chair, Morris County Improvement Authority] Chair, Morris County Improvement Authority

2013-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

175

Las Vegas Serves up Biodiesel for Local Schools  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This 2-page Clean Cities fact sheet describes the use of biodiesel as a fuel source in buses by the Clark County School District, located in Las Vegas, NV. It includes information on the history of the program, along with contact information for the local Clean Cities Coordinator and Clark County School District.

Not Available

2004-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

176

Property:Incentive/AddlPlaceCounty | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

AddlPlaceCounty AddlPlaceCounty Jump to: navigation, search Property Name Incentive/AddlPlaceCounty Property Type Page Pages using the property "Incentive/AddlPlaceCounty" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) A Allegany County Wind Ordinance (Maryland) + Allegany County, Maryland + Anne Arundel County - Solar and Geothermal Equipment Property Tax Credit (Maryland) + Anne Arundel County, Maryland + Anne Arundel County - Wind Ordinance (Maryland) + Anne Arundel County, Maryland + B Baltimore County - Solar and Geothermal Equipment Property Tax Credit (Maryland) + Baltimore County, Maryland + Baltimore County - Wind Ordinance (Maryland) + Baltimore County, Maryland + Brownfield Development Tax Abatements (Alabama) + Alabama + C Calvert County - Wind Ordinance (Maryland) + Calvert County, Maryland +

177

Sonoma County - Energy Independence Program | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sonoma County - Energy Independence Program Sonoma County - Energy Independence Program Sonoma County - Energy Independence Program < Back Eligibility Commercial Industrial Multi-Family Residential Residential Savings Category Home Weatherization Commercial Weatherization Sealing Your Home Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Cooling Design & Remodeling Windows, Doors, & Skylights Ventilation Heating Heat Pumps Appliances & Electronics Commercial Lighting Lighting Manufacturing Insulation Water Heating Buying & Making Electricity Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Solar Swimming Pool Heaters Program Info State California Program Type PACE Financing '''The Federal Housing Financing Agency issued a statement in July 2010 that was critical of PACE programs. Many PACE programs, including Sonoma

178

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Tehachapi Wind Energy Storage Project Using Li-Ion Batteries - Christopher Clarke, SCE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Tehachapi Storage Project (TSP) Tehachapi Storage Project (TSP) American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Funded Project Christopher R. Clarke - Southern California Edison (SCE) christopher.r.clarke@sce.com Examples of Wind Generation in the Tehachapi Wind Resource Area August 2012 June 2012 May 2012 February 2012 April 2012 Progress To Date * Facility construction expected to complete in September 2012 * First Power Conversion System installed September 13, 2012 * A123 to ship initial battery equipment for delivery week of September 24, 2012 Future Major Milestones * September 2012 - Completion of BESS facility * October 2012 - Initial installation * November 2012 - Installation of second Power Conversion Subsystem * Q1 2013 - Install balance of equipment and commissioning * Q2 2013 - Start of 2 year M&V testing and reporting

179

Queen Anne's County- Solar Zoning  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Queen Anne's County zoning code allows for ground mounted solar arrays in areas zoned as "open space," "agricultural," and "countryside" districts.

180

Stafford County The Kansas County Profile Report is published annually by the Institute for Policy & Social  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Stafford County #12;Foreword The Kansas County Profile Report is published annually to http://www.census.gov. Kansas County Profile Stafford County, Kansas Page 1 of 58 Population DECENNIAL on these classification systems, please refer to http://www.census.gov. Kansas County Profile Stafford County, Kansas Page

Peterson, Blake R.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "including clark county" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

TEAMING AS A SMALL BUSINESS Brent L. Clark, Vice President Performance Results Corporation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TEAMING AS A SMALL BUSINESS TEAMING AS A SMALL BUSINESS Brent L. Clark, Vice President Performance Results Corporation 2 WHO IS PERFORMANCE RESULTS CORPORATION? * Incorporated i n A pril 2 000 * SBA C er4fied S mall, W oman---Owned C orpora4on * Kathy C linton O wner a nd P resident * Located a t 6 C anyon R oad, M organtown, W V * Employs o ver 2 30 p ersonnel l ocated a cross 1 6 ci4es a nd 1 3 s tates * 2010 r evenue w as $ 25M, p rojected t o e xceed $30M i n 2 011 * Primary c lients a re t he D OE, D OJ, C DC, a nd A rmy 3 PRC CORE COMPETENCIES Program & P roject Management S upport Technical & E ngineering Support S ervices Informa4on T echnology Support S ervices Facili4es & Administra4ve Support S ervices Strategic P lanning & Management S upport 4 Valued P artner - T etra T ech: * Quality r eputa4on * CommiWed

182

Population analysis relative to geothermal energy development, Imperial County, California  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The historical and current population characteristics of Imperial County, California, are examined. These include vital rates, urbanization, town sizes, labor force composition, income, utility usage, and ethnic composition. Inferences are drawn on some of the important social and economic processes. Multivariate statistical analysis is used to study present relationships between variables. Population projections for the County were performed under historical, standard, and geothermal projection assumptions. The transferability of methods and results to other geothermal regions anticipating energy development is shown. (MHR)

Pick, J.B.; Jung, T.H.; Butler, E.

1977-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

183

Canasawacta Creek Project: Chenango County, New York  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

County Soil and Water Conservation District, the U.S. ArmyCounty Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) ArmyCounty (NY) soil and Water Conservation District, and as an

OReilly, Mary; MacEwan, David; Greco, Brandon; Nelson, Debra; Long, George; Rowen, John

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

184

How One Delaware County is Saving Money and Creating Jobs | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

One Delaware County is Saving Money and Creating Jobs One Delaware County is Saving Money and Creating Jobs How One Delaware County is Saving Money and Creating Jobs April 26, 2011 - 3:23pm Addthis Tweedie Doe Project Officer, Golden Field Office What does this project do? New Castle County will carry out 158 conservation measures, including heat pump and boiler replacements, high-efficiency motors, lighting retrofits and controls, and a white reflective roof. The project impacts over 20 facilities and 461,643 square feet of building space. Solar arrays, installed on the Government Center and Hockessin Library roofs, will provide 128 kilowatts of electricity to the two buildings. Federal, state and county officials were in New Castle County, Delaware last week to kick off the next phase of the county's Smart Energy

185

Beep Beep! King County, Washington Is Charging Up Savings | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Beep Beep! King County, Washington Is Charging Up Savings Beep Beep! King County, Washington Is Charging Up Savings Beep Beep! King County, Washington Is Charging Up Savings April 12, 2011 - 5:48pm Addthis April Saylor April Saylor Former Digital Outreach Strategist, Office of Public Affairs What does this mean for me? King County used a $6.1 million grant to conduct energy efficiency upgrades. Upgrades included the installation of electric vehicle charging stations, county vehicle fleet upgrades and senior housing energy improvements. The county is helping lead a regional effort to install electric vehicle charging stations at strategic locations across the Puget Sound area. Residents of King County, Washington, are seeing several improvements in their community thanks to a $6.1 million Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG). The grant, which is funded by the

186

Broome County Biomass Facility | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Sign Up Search Page Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon Broome County Biomass Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Broome County Biomass Facility Facility...

187

Craven County Biomass Facility | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Sign Up Search Page Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon Craven County Biomass Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Craven County Biomass Facility Facility...

188

Davis County Biomass Facility | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Sign Up Search Page Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon Davis County Biomass Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Davis County Biomass Facility Facility...

189

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Santa Barbara County,...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Santa Barbara County, California to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Santa Barbara County, California on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings...

190

Solar Maid Ventura County | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

search Logo: Solar Maid Ventura County Name Solar Maid Ventura County Place Lancaster, California Sector Solar Product Solar Operations and Maintenance Year founded 2012 Number...

191

Placer County Water Agency | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Placer County Water Agency Jump to: navigation, search Name Placer County Water Agency Place California Utility Id 15127 Utility Location Yes Ownership P NERC Location WECC NERC...

192

RECIPIENT:Monroe County  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

p,, '~~' p,, '~~' RECIPIENT:Monroe County u.s. DEP . .\RTlVIENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERJl.1INATION PROJECT TITLE: Landfill Gas Utilization Plant Page 1 01'3 STATE: NY Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Pro<:urement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number elD Number CDP DE-EEOO3123 GFO-O003123-001 EE3123 Based on my review of the infonnation concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 4S1.IA), I have made the following determination : ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 85.21 Methane The installation, modification, operation, and removal of commercially available methane gas recovery and gas recovery utilization systems installed within a previously disturbed or developed area on or contiguous to an existlng

193

350 City County Building  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

(. (. - ,- Department of Eilqgy Washington, DC20585 ,. i x \ .The Honorable Wellington E. Webb .' '. ' 350 City County Building / Denver, Colorado 80202 ., ; Dear Mayor Webb: ., ~, Secretary of Energy' Hazel O'Leary has announced's new approach to openness in the Department of Energy,(OOE) and its communications with the public. In support of this initiative, we,are pleased to forward the'enclosed'information related to the former Uhiversity of Denver Research Institute site in your, jurisdiction that performed work for DOE's predecessor,agencies. This' i~nformation'is provided for your.informatibn, use,,and retention.. ; DOE's Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) is responsible for identification of sitesused by DOE's predecessor agencies, determining

194

Bexar County Parking Garage Photovoltaic Panels  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The main objective of the Bexar County Parking Garage Photovoltaic (PV) Panel project is to install a PV System that will promote the use of renewable energy. This project will also help sustain Bexar County ongoing greenhouse gas emissions reduction and energy efficiency goals. The scope of this project includes the installation of a 100-kW system on the top level of a new 236,285 square feet parking garage. The PV system consists of 420 solar panels that covers 7,200 square feet and is tied into the electric-grid. It provides electricity to the office area located within the garage. The estimated annual electricity production of the PV system is 147,000 kWh per year.

Golda Weir

2012-01-23T23:59:59.000Z

195

The King County Solid Waste Division handles 100 % of the mixed solid waste generated in  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

(PSAPCA)) Regulation I, Article 7. Unlike the permit, this document is not a legally enforceable document. It includes references to the applicable statutory or regulatory provisions that relate to King County Solid Waste Divisions air emissions, and provides a description of King County Solid Waste Divisions activities, including a short compliance history. Statement of Basis January 4, 2001

unknown authors

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

196

Grid-connected Integrated Community Energy System. Preliminary report, Phase II, August 9--November 8, 1977. [Clark Univ. , Worcester  

SciTech Connect

Clark University in the New England area represents an attractive site for demonstration of cogeneration. In Phase I of the program, the team reported: that the system of choice is a diesel generator sized at about Clark's peak electric demand; it should burn No. 6 fuel oil; the system can run at nearly full capacity the year round, sell 40 percent of its output, and receive backup as needed from Massachusetts Electric Company; the system should deliver a rate of return of 15 to 20 percent; and there appear to be no institutional or environmental problems. An update on a number of issues that were incompletely resolved in the Phase I report is provided. In Section 2 additional documentation on institutional issues involved in the proposed demonstration plant is provided. In Section 3 a preliminary design analysis that clearly defines the choice of engine and provides revised operating data in light of additional load profile studies is provided. In particular, it is found that: a Sulzer No. 6-oil-burning 1405-kW diesel is the system of choice; the engine should be housed in a separate building in close proximity to the existing central boiler and steam distribution points; and as a result of detailed summer load studies, the engine as specified can be operated with higher capacity factors than anticipated in Phase I. In Section 4 a revised cost estimate using information developed in Sections 2 and 3 is given. No significant change in net cash flow was found, and there was an internal rate of return of 15 percent. The overall conclusion is therefore that, though some details have changed, the Clark demonstration project continues to appear highly attractive. (MCW)

1977-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

197

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Fayette Fayette County, Pennsylvania to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on Delicious Rank Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on Digg Find More places to share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on AddThis.com... Better Buildings Residential Network Progress Stories Interviews Videos Events Quick Links to Partner Information AL | AZ | CA | CO | CT FL | GA | IL | IN | LA ME | MD | MA | MI | MO

198

Gratiot County | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Gratiot County Gratiot County Jump to: navigation, search Name Gratiot County Facility Gratiot County Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner Ivenergy Developer Ivenergy Energy Purchaser Detroit Edison Location Breckenridge MI Coordinates 43.38009947°, -84.4896698° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":43.38009947,"lon":-84.4896698,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

199

Power County | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County County Jump to: navigation, search Name Power County Facility Power County Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner CG Power Solutions Developer CG Power Solutions Energy Purchaser PacifiCorp Location American Falls ID Coordinates 42.66135774°, -112.9727554° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":42.66135774,"lon":-112.9727554,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

200

Retrofit Savings for Brazos County  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This report presents the energy and dollar savings for the period May 2000 - April 2001 for 10 of the Brazos County facilities that have been retrofit. The electricity use saved was 555,170 kWh and the demand was 1062 kW, which is equivalent to a $31,743 dollars savings, $24,650 from electricity use and $7,093 from the electric demand. These savings represent a 60.8% of the audit-estimated savings and a 93.7% of the audit-estimated savings if just the positive one were taken in account. The savings have improved somewhat from the previous report that included the billing periods for January to August 1999. The savings for the earlier period were 48.0% of the audit-estimated savings that means compared with 60.8% for the current period. In general has been an improvement in the energy saving in most of the facilities. The cases where are observed negative savings are the Minimum Security Jail, where is known that the area was increased significantly, the Arena Hall, where the modeling can be normalized due to kind of use of this facility, and the Road and bridges Shop, which looks to be operated more time in this period.

Baltazar-Cervantes, J. C.; Shao, X.; Claridge, D. E.

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "including clark county" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Geothermal development plan: Maricopa County  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Maricopa County Geothermal Development Plan evaluated the market potential for utilizing geothermal energy. The study identified six potential geothermal resource areas with temperatures less than 100{sup 0}C (212{sup 0}F) and in addition, four suspected intermediate temperature areas (90{sup 0} to 150{sup 0}C, 194{sup 0} to 300{sup 0}F). Geothermal resources are found to occur in and near the Phoenix metropolitan area where average population growth rates of two to three percent per year are expected over the next 40 years. Rapid growth in the manufacturing, trade and service sectors of the regional economy provides opportunities for the direct utilization of geothermal energy. A regional energy use analysis is included containing energy use and price projections. Water supplies are found to be adequate to support this growth, though agricultural water use is expected to diminish. The study also contains a detailed section matching geothermal resources to potential users. Two comparative analyses providing economic details for space heating projects are incorporated.

White, D.H.; Goldstone, L.A.

1982-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

202

Geothermal development plan: Yuma county  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

One hot spring and 33 wells drilled in the county discharge water at temperatures sufficient for direct-use geothermal applications such as process heat and space heating and cooling. Currently, one industry within the county has been identified which may be able to use geothermal energy for its process heat requirements. Also, a computer simulation model was used to predict geothermal energy on line as a function of time under both private and city-owned utility development of the resource.

White, D.H.

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

203

Geothermal Development Plan: Pima County  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Pima County is located entirely within the Basin and Range physiographic province in which geothermal resources are known to occur. Continued growth as indicated by such factors as population growth, employment and income will require large amounts of energy. It is believed that geothermal energy could provide some of the energy that will be needed. Potential users of geothermal energy within the county are identified.

White, D.H.

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

204

Measuring availability of healthful foods in two rural Texas counties  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

A comprehensive in-store survey may capture the availability of healthful food alternatives in different store types in two rural counties. The purpose of this study was to: (1) compare the availability of healthful foods in two rural Texas counties; and (2) compare the variety of healthful foods in two rural Texas counties. This study also acts as a pilot test for further food availability research in four other rural counties of the Brazos Valley. An unobtrusive, observational survey was used to measure availability of healthful food in all (100%) grocery, convenience, and discount stores (n=44) in two rural counties in the Brazos Valley of Texas. Results from the surveys indicated that availability of healthful food alternatives varied greatly among the three different store types and two counties surveyed. Grocery stores (n=7) were more likely than convenience (n=31) and discount (n=6) stores to offer fresh fruits and vegetables, leanmeat options, and low-fat/skim milk products. Fresh fruits and vegetables were available in 100% of grocery stores. Only 16.1% of convenience stores, compared with 0.0% in discount stores, offered fresh fruits and vegetables. Variety of fruits and vegetables varied greatly among the three different store types and the two counties surveyed. Findings suggest that the survey utilized was feasible in determining the availability of healthful food items in two rural counties. Implications of this study include the need for knowledge and awareness of rural consumers and rural food supply. Furthermore, nutrition education for rural consumers and those purchasing foods provided to rural areas is desired. This study provided that further investigation into the availability of healthful foods in rural areas is needed.

Bustillos, Brenda Diane

2006-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

205

Tax Credits, Rebates & Savings | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Clark County REMC - Clark County REMC - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program Indiana Residential Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Cooling Heat Pumps...

206

Liaisons  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Water Resources Association, and the Amargosa Toad Working Group. Phil Klevorick, Clark County " Mr. Klevorick currently is the program manager for the Clark County...

207

Fairfax County - Green Power Purchase (Virginia) | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

2010), wind power accounted for 10% of the general county's annual electricity consumption (and hence, the county met their stated goal of 10% by 2010). Fairfax County does...

208

Anderson County, South Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Anderson County, South Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Anderson County, South Carolina ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

209

Androscoggin County, Maine ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Androscoggin County, Maine ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Androscoggin County, Maine ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate...

210

Allegan County, Michigan ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Allegan County, Michigan ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Allegan County, Michigan ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

211

Becker County, Minnesota ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Becker County, Minnesota ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Becker County, Minnesota ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

212

Bennington County, Vermont ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Bennington County, Vermont ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Bennington County, Vermont ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate...

213

Abbeville County, South Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Abbeville County, South Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Abbeville County, South Carolina ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

214

Baltimore County, Maryland ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Baltimore County, Maryland ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Baltimore County, Maryland ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate...

215

Barnwell County, South Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Barnwell County, South Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Barnwell County, South Carolina ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

216

Berkshire County, Massachusetts ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Berkshire County, Massachusetts ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Berkshire County, Massachusetts ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

217

Arapahoe County, Colorado ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Arapahoe County, Colorado ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Arapahoe County, Colorado ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

218

Alexander County, North Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Alexander County, North Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Alexander County, North Carolina ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

219

Albemarle County, Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Albemarle County, Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Albemarle County, Virginia ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate...

220

Alfalfa County, Oklahoma ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Alfalfa County, Oklahoma ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Alfalfa County, Oklahoma ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "including clark county" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Berks County, Pennsylvania ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Berks County, Pennsylvania ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Berks County, Pennsylvania ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate...

222

Bayfield County, Wisconsin ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Bayfield County, Wisconsin ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Bayfield County, Wisconsin ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate...

223

Augusta County, Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Augusta County, Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Augusta County, Virginia ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

224

Alamance County, North Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Alamance County, North Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Alamance County, North Carolina ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

225

Archuleta County, Colorado ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Archuleta County, Colorado ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Archuleta County, Colorado ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate...

226

Allendale County, South Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Allendale County, South Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Allendale County, South Carolina ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

227

Barron County, Wisconsin ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Barron County, Wisconsin ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Barron County, Wisconsin ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

228

Baltimore City County, Maryland ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Baltimore City County, Maryland ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Baltimore City County, Maryland ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

229

Berkeley County, South Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Berkeley County, South Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Berkeley County, South Carolina ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

230

Alameda County, California ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon Alameda County, California ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Alameda County,...

231

Bedford County, Tennessee ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Bedford County, Tennessee ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Bedford County, Tennessee ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

232

Bedford City County, Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone |...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Bedford City County, Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Bedford City County, Virginia ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

233

Beaufort County, North Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

History Facebook icon Twitter icon Beaufort County, North Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Beaufort County, North...

234

Audrain County, Missouri ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Audrain County, Missouri ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Audrain County, Missouri ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

235

Anderson County, Kentucky ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Anderson County, Kentucky ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Anderson County, Kentucky ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

236

Ballard County, Kentucky ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Ballard County, Kentucky ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Ballard County, Kentucky ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

237

Alleghany County, North Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Alleghany County, North Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Alleghany County, North Carolina ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

238

Aitkin County, Minnesota ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Page Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon Aitkin County, Minnesota ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Aitkin County, Minnesota...

239

Barbour County, West Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone |...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Barbour County, West Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Barbour County, West Virginia ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

240

Beltrami County, Minnesota ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Beltrami County, Minnesota ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Beltrami County, Minnesota ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "including clark county" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Ashland County, Wisconsin ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Ashland County, Wisconsin ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Ashland County, Wisconsin ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

242

Belknap County, New Hampshire ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone |...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Belknap County, New Hampshire ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Belknap County, New Hampshire ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

243

Accomack County, Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Accomack County, Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Accomack County, Virginia ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

244

Bertie County, North Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone |...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Bertie County, North Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Bertie County, North Carolina ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

245

Arlington County, Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Arlington County, Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Arlington County, Virginia ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate...

246

Asotin County, Washington ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Asotin County, Washington ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Asotin County, Washington ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

247

Bamberg County, South Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone ...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Bamberg County, South Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Bamberg County, South Carolina ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

248

Winnebago County Landfill Gas Biomass Facility | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Winnebago County Landfill Gas Biomass Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Winnebago County Landfill Gas Biomass Facility Facility Winnebago County Landfill Gas Sector Biomass...

249

111th Congressional Districts and Counties | Data.gov  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Districts and Counties Dataset Summary Description This dataset contains a nationwide inventory of all congressional districts and the counties or pieces of counties associated...

250

PP-118 Hill County Electric Cooperative Inc | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

18 Hill County Electric Cooperative Inc PP-118 Hill County Electric Cooperative Inc Presidential permit authorizing Hill County Electric Cooperative Inc to construct, operate, and...

251

RECIPIENT:Utah County STATE: UT PROJECT TITLE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Utah County STATE: UT Utah County STATE: UT PROJECT TITLE: EECBG - Utah County Energy Efficiency Retrofits Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number cm Number DE-FOA-OOOOO13 EEOOOO889 GFO-O000889-002 EEO Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A), I have made the following determination: Cx, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A11 Technical advice and planning assistance to international, national, state, and local organizations. A9 Information gathering (including, but not limited to, literature surveys, Inventories, audits), data analysis (including computer modeling), document preparation (such as conceptual design or feasibility studies, analytical energy supply

252

Wildlife Impact Assessment and Summary of Previous Mitigation Related to Hydroelectric Projects in Montana, Phase I, Volume Two (A), Clark Fork Projects, Thompson Falls Dam, Operator, Montana Power Company.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Thompson Falls Dam inundated approximately 347 acres of wildlife habitat that likely included conifer forests, deciduous bottoms, mixed conifer-deciduous forests and grassland/hay meadows. Additionally, at least one island, and several gravel bars were inundated when the river was transformed into a reservoir. The loss of riparian and riverine habitat adversely affected the diverse wildlife community inhabiting the lower Clark Fork River area. Quantitative loss estimates were determined for selected target species based on best available information. The loss estimates were based on inundation of the habitat capable of supporting the target species. Whenever possible, loss estimates bounds were developed by determining ranges of impacts based on density estimates and/or acreage loss estimates. Of the twelve target species or species groups, nine were assessed as having net negative impacts. 86 refs., 2 figs., 5 tabs.

Wood, Marilyn

1984-03-27T23:59:59.000Z

253

Geothermal : Economic Impacts of Geothermal Development in Whatcom County, Washington.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report estimates the local economic impacts that could be anticipated from the development of a 100 megawatt (MW) geothermal power plant in eastern Whatcom County, Washington, near Mt. Baker, as shown in Figure 1. The study was commissioned by the Bonneville Power Administration to quantify such impacts as part of regional confirmation work recommended by the Northwest Power Planning Council. Whatcom County was chosen due to both identified geotherrnal resources and developer interest. The analysis will focus on two phases: a plant construction phase, including well field development, generating plant construction, and transmission line construction; and an operations phase. Economic impacts will occur to the extent that construction and operations affect the local economy. These impacts will depend on the existing structure of the Whatcom County economy and estimates of revenues that may accrue to the county as a result of plant construction, operation, and maintenance. Specific impacts may include additional direct employment at the plant, secondary impacts from wage payments being used to purchase locally produced goods and services, and impacts due to expenditures of royalty and tax payments received by the county. The basis for the analysis of economic impacts in this study is the US Forest Service IMPLAN input-output modeling system.

Lesser, Jonathan A.

1992-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

254

Geothermal : Economic Impacts of Geothermal Development in Skamania County, Washington.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report estimates the local economic impacts that could be anticipated from the development of a 100 megawatt (MW) geothermal power plant in eastern Skamania County, Washington, near Mt. Adams, as shown in Figure 1. The study was commissioned by the Bonneville Power Administration to quantify such impacts as part of regional confirmation work recommended by the Northwest Power Planning Council. Skamania County was chosen due to both identified geothermal resources and developer interest. The analysis will focus on two phases: a plant construction phase, including well field development, generating plant construction, and transmission line construction; and an operations phase. Economic impacts will occur to the extent that construction and operations affect the local economy. These impacts will depend on the existing structure of the Skamania County economy and estimates of revenues that may accrue to the county as a result of plant construction, operation, and maintenance. Specific impacts may include additional direct employment at the plant, secondary impacts from wage payments being used to purchase locally produced goods and services, and impacts due to expenditures of royalty and tax payments received by the county. The basis for the analysis of economic impacts in this study is the US Forest Service IMPLAN input-output modeling system.

Lesser, Jonathan A.

1992-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

255

Geothermal development plan: Yuma County  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Yuma County Area Development Plan evaluated the county-wide market potential for utilizing geothermal energy. The study identified four potential geothermal resource areas with temperatures less than 90/sup 0/C (194/sup 0/F), and in addition, two areas are inferred to contain geothermal resources with intermediate (90/sup 0/C to 150/sup 0/C, 194/sup 0/F to 300/sup 0/F) temperature potential. The resource areas are isolated, although one resource area is located near Yuma, Arizona. One resource site is inferred to contain a hot dry rock resource. Anticipated population growth in the county is expected to be 2 percent per year over the next 40 years. The primary employment sector is agriculture, though some light industry is located in the county. Water supplies are found to be adequate to support future growth without advese affect on agriculture. Six firms were found in Yuma County which may be able to utilize geothermal energy for process heat needs. In addition, several agricultural processors were found, concentrated in citrus processing and livestock raising. Geothermal energy utilization projections suggest that by the year 2000, geothermal energy may economically provide the energy equivalent of 53,000 barrels of oil per year to the industrial sector if developed privately. Geothermal utilization projections increase to 132,000 barrels of oil per year by 2000 if a municipal utility developed the resource.

White, D.H.; Goldstone, L.A.

1982-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

256

Washington County- Solar Ordinance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Provides for zoning restrictions on solar energy systems, including (1) six foot setbacks; (2) 20 foot height limitations on freestanding systems; (3) limitations on square feet of freestanding...

257

Allegany County Wind Ordinance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This ordinance sets requirements for industrial wind energy conversion systems. These requirements include minimum separation distances, setback requirements, electromagnetic interference analysis ...

258

RECIPIENT:Lake County, FL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lake County, FL Lake County, FL u.s. DEPARTIIIEN T OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CEN T ER NEPA DETERlIJJNATION PROJECf TITLE: Lake County, FL EECBG SOW (S) Page lof2 STATE: FL Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Numbcr CID Numbtr OE·FOA-OOOOO13 DE·EE00Q0786.001 0 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed adion, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized undtr DOE Order 451.IA), I have made the following determination: ex. EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 65.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conserva tion, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical

259

Geothermal development plan: Maricopa county  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Maricopa county is the area of Arizona receiving top priority since it contains over half of the state's population. The county is located entirely within the Basin and Range physiographic region in which geothermal resources are known to occur. Several approaches were taken to match potential users to geothermal resources. One approach involved matching some of the largest facilities in the county to nearby geothermal resources. Other approaches involved identifying industrial processes whose heat requirements are less than the average assessed geothermal reservoir temperature of 110/sup 0/C (230/sup 0/F). Since many of the industries are located on or near geothermal resources, geothermal energy potentially could be adapted to many industrial processes.

White, D.H.

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

260

EIS-0441: Mohave County Wind Farm Project, Mohave County, Arizona  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This EIS, prepared by the Bureau of Land Management with DOEs Western Area Power Administration as a cooperating agency, evaluated the environmental impacts of a proposed wind energy project on public lands in Mohave County, Arizona. Power generated by this project would tie to the electrical power grid through an interconnection to one of Westerns transmission lines.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "including clark county" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Montgomery County, Kentucky: Energy Resources | Open Energy Informatio...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County is a county in Kentucky. Its FIPS County Code is 173. It is classified as ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Number 4 Climate Zone Subtype A. Places in Montgomery County,...

262

Carroll County, Tennessee: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County is a county in Tennessee. Its FIPS County Code is 017. It is classified as ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Number 4 Climate Zone Subtype A. Places in Carroll County,...

263

Knox County, Kentucky: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Knox County is a county in Kentucky. Its FIPS County Code is 121. It is classified as ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Number 4 Climate Zone Subtype A. Places in Knox County, Kentucky...

264

Better Buildings Partners: Rutland County, Vermont  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Rutland County, Vermont Rutland County, Vermont H.E.A.T. Squad Warms Homeowners up to Energy Efficiency Photo of an ornate historical building, with flowering trees beside it. A...

265

Ashe County- Wind Energy System Ordinance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

In 2007 Ashe County adopted a wind ordinance to regulate the use of wind-energy systems in unincorporated areas of the county and to describe the conditions by which a permit for installing such a...

266

Miami Dade County Public School Financing Profile  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Profile of Success Miami-Dade County Public Schools Miami-Dade County Public Schools-Stats at a Glance Finance Vehicle Tax-exempt lease purchase agreement (via master lease)...

267

California Energy Commission - Electricity Consumption by County  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County (2006-2009) Electricity consumption data from the California Energy Commission sorted by County for Residential and Non-residential from 2006 to 2009.


...

268

VHF Free-Free Beam High-Q Micromechanical Resonators Kun Wang, Yinglei Yu, Ark-Chew Wong, and Clark T.-C. Nguyen  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

VHF Free-Free Beam High-Q Micromechanical Resonators Kun Wang, Yinglei Yu, Ark-Chew Wong, and Clark Science University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2122 ABSTRACT Free-free beam, flexural and their associated losses are virtually eliminated from the design. Using this approach, free-free beam µmechanical

Nguyen, Clark T.-C.

269

EA-1957: Cabin Creek Biomass Facility, Place County, CA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

DOE is proposing to provide funding to Placer County, California to construct and operate a two-megawatt wood-to-energy biomass facility at the Eastern Regional Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) and Landfill in unincorporated Placer County. The wood?to?energy biomass facility would use a gasification technology. The fuel supply for the proposed project would be solely woody biomass, derived from a variety of sources including hazardous fuels residuals, forest thinning and harvest residuals, and Wildland Urban Interface sourced waste materials from residential and commercial property defensible space clearing and property management activities.

270

Santa Clara County Planar Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Demonstration Project  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Santa Clara County Planar Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (PSOFC) project demonstrated the technical viability of pre-commercial PSOFC technology at the County 911 Communications headquarters, as well as the input fuel flexibility of the PSOFC. PSOFC operation was demonstrated on natural gas and denatured ethanol. The Santa Clara County Planar Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (PSOFC) project goals were to acquire, site, and demonstrate the technical viability of a pre-commercial PSOFC technology at the County 911 Communications headquarters. Additional goals included educating local permit approval authorities, and other governmental entities about PSOFC technology, existing fuel cell standards and specific code requirements. The project demonstrated the Bloom Energy (BE) PSOFC technology in grid parallel mode, delivering a minimum 15 kW over 8760 operational hours. The PSOFC system demonstrated greater than 81% electricity availability and 41% electrical efficiency (LHV net AC), providing reliable, stable power to a critical, sensitive 911 communications system that serves geographical boundaries of the entire Santa Clara County. The project also demonstrated input fuel flexibility. BE developed and demonstrated the capability to run its prototype PSOFC system on ethanol. BE designed the hardware necessary to deliver ethanol into its existing PSOFC system. Operational parameters were determined for running the system on ethanol, natural gas (NG), and a combination of both. Required modeling was performed to determine viable operational regimes and regimes where coking could occur.

Fred Mitlitsky; Sara Mulhauser; David Chien; Deepak Shukla; David Weingaertner

2009-11-14T23:59:59.000Z

271

San Diego County - Wind Regulations (California) | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Wind Regulations (California) San Diego County - Wind Regulations (California) < Back Eligibility Commercial Industrial Residential Savings Category Wind Buying & Making...

272

Sullivan County, Pennsylvania: Energy Resources | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Climate Zone Subtype A. Places in Sullivan County, Pennsylvania Dushore, Pennsylvania Eagles Mere, Pennsylvania Forksville, Pennsylvania Laporte, Pennsylvania Retrieved from...

273

Baltimore County - Wind Ordinance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Baltimore County - Wind Ordinance Eligibility Agricultural Residential Savings For Wind Buying & Making Electricity Program Information Maryland Program Type Siting and...

274

San Bernardino County - Green Building Incentive | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

County's http:www.sbcounty.govgreencountysbbuildersgreenbuilding.aspx Green Building program will receive accelerated plan review, priority inspections, design...

275

Aspen & Pitkin County - Renewable Energy Mitigation Program ...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Colorado Name Aspen & Pitkin County - Renewable Energy Mitigation Program Incentive Type Building Energy Code Applicable Sector Commercial, Residential Eligible Technologies...

276

Marin County - Green Building Requirements | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Marin County - Green Building Requirements Marin County - Green Building Requirements Eligibility Commercial Construction Residential Savings For Heating & Cooling Home...

277

Madison County - Wind Energy Systems Ordinance | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Madison County - Wind Energy Systems Ordinance Madison County - Wind Energy Systems Ordinance < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Industrial Residential Savings Category...

278

EIS-0439: Rice Solar Energy Project, Riverside County, California |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9: Rice Solar Energy Project, Riverside County, California 9: Rice Solar Energy Project, Riverside County, California EIS-0439: Rice Solar Energy Project, Riverside County, California Summary This environmental review was prepared by DOE's Western Area Power Administration with the Department of the Interior's Bureau of Land Management (BLM) as a cooperating agency. This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts of the Rice Solar Energy Project, a 150-megawatt solar concentrating electric powerplant proposed to be constructed on private land in the Sonoran Desert. DOE's Western Area Power Administration actions under this proposal include building and operating a new substation to interconnect the solar project to Western's transmission system. DOE may also use this EIS as part of its decision whether to issue a Federal loan guarantee to support the proposal. BLM's

279

Santa Clara County - Zoning Ordinance (California) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Zoning Ordinance (California) Zoning Ordinance (California) Santa Clara County - Zoning Ordinance (California) < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Residential Savings Category Solar Buying & Making Electricity Wind Program Info State California Program Type Solar/Wind Permitting Standards Provider Santa Clara County Santa Clara County's Zoning Ordinance includes standards for wind and solar structures for residential, agricultural, and commercial uses. Commercial Wind Structures Commercial-scale wind systems must be setback from property lines by a distance equal to the height of the tower plus the radius of the blades. The structure must also be placed in such a manner to minimize its overall visual impact, may not obstruct the view for neighbors, and must be colored to help the structure blend into the surrounding environment. Lettering and

280

SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ABOVEGROUND OUTDOOR, M.D., M.P.H. Commissioner SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES #12;Suffolk County Department of Health Services' Aboveground Outdoor Tank and Associated Piping Design Standards _____________________ 1

Homes, Christopher C.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "including clark county" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Mineral balances, including in drinking water, estimated for Merced County dairy herds  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Proteins and byproducts Canola meal 50 to 75 25 to 50 Wheatn = 33. cottonseed and canola meal (table 1). Between 50%

Castillo, Alejandro R Dr.; Santos, Jose Eduardo P.; Tabone, Tom J.

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

282

Mineral balances, including in drinking water, estimated for Merced County dairy herds  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and daily drinking-water intake, calculated using NRC (2001)they represent total water intake. Feeding certain mineralsand daily drinking water intake, which was calcu- lated

Castillo, Alejandro R Dr.; Santos, Jose Eduardo P.; Tabone, Tom J.

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

283

Mineral balances, including in drinking water, estimated for Merced County dairy herds  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

intake, calculated using NRC (2001) recommended formula.lactation and growth (NRC 2001). ND = not detected. http://J Dairy Sci 88:372133. [NRC] National Research Council.

Castillo, Alejandro R Dr.; Santos, Jose Eduardo P.; Tabone, Tom J.

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

284

Geothermal development plan: Graham/Greenlee Counties  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Graham/Greenlee County Area Development Plan evaluated the region-wide market potential for utilizing geothermal energy. The study identified five potential geothermal resource areas with temperatures less than 100{sup 0}C (212{sup 0}F). In addition, seven areas are inferred to contain higher temperature resources with the Clifton Hot Springs area having electrical potential. Geothermal resources are found to occur near Safford and Clifton, the two major population centers. Future population growth in the two counties is expected to average less than two percent per year over the next 40 years. Growth in the mining, trade and services economic sectors provide opportunities for the direct utilization of geothermal energy. A regional energy use analysis is included containing energy use and price projections. Water supplies are found to be adequate for urban needs, though agricultural and mineral water use may be limited in the future. The study also contains a preliminary economic analysis for two district heating systems as well as a section matching geothermal resources to potential users.

White, D.H.; Goldstone, L.A.

1982-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

285

County Wind Ordinance Standards | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

County Wind Ordinance Standards County Wind Ordinance Standards County Wind Ordinance Standards < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Industrial Local Government Residential Savings Category Wind Buying & Making Electricity Program Info State California Program Type Solar/Wind Permitting Standards Provider California Energy Commission [http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/asm/ab_0001-0050/ab_45_bill_200... Assembly Bill 45] of 2009 authorized counties to adopt ordinances to provide for the installation of small wind systems (50 kW or smaller) outside urbanized areas but within the county's jurisdiction. The bill also addressed specific aspects of a typical wind ordinance and established the limiting factors by which a county's wind ordinance can be no more restrictive. Counties may freely make more lenient ordinances, but AB 45

286

Snohomish County PUD No 1 - Build with Energy Star Program | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Snohomish County PUD No 1 - Build with Energy Star Program Snohomish County PUD No 1 - Build with Energy Star Program Snohomish County PUD No 1 - Build with Energy Star Program < Back Eligibility Construction Savings Category Appliances & Electronics Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Heat Pumps Commercial Lighting Lighting Program Info State District of Columbia Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount Air-Source Electric Heat Pump: up to $1,000 Geothermal Heat Pump: $1,500 Clothes Washer: $75 Refrigerator: $35 Water Heater: $50 Advanced Lighting Package (Single Family): up to $300 Energy Star Certified Homes Bonus Rebate: $100 - $600 Provider Snohomish County PUD The Build with Energy Star Program from Snohomish County PUD No 1 is designed to encourage builders to include energy-efficient measures in new

287

EA-1957: Cabin Creek Biomass Facility, Place County, CA | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7: Cabin Creek Biomass Facility, Place County, CA 7: Cabin Creek Biomass Facility, Place County, CA EA-1957: Cabin Creek Biomass Facility, Place County, CA SUMMARY DOE is proposing to provide funding to Placer County, California to construct and operate a two-megawatt wood-to-energy biomass facility at the Eastern Regional Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) and Landfill in unincorporated Placer County. The wood-to-energy biomass facility would use a gasification technology. The fuel supply for the proposed project would be solely woody biomass, derived from a variety of sources including hazardous fuels residuals, forest thinning and harvest residuals, and Wildland Urban Interface sourced waste materials from residential and commercial property defensible space clearing and property management activities

288

Eagle County - Eagle County Efficient Building Code (ECO-Green Build) |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Eagle County - Eagle County Efficient Building Code (ECO-Green Eagle County - Eagle County Efficient Building Code (ECO-Green Build) Eagle County - Eagle County Efficient Building Code (ECO-Green Build) < Back Eligibility Commercial Multi-Family Residential Residential Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Program Info State Colorado Program Type Building Energy Code Provider Eagle County In an effort to reduce county-wide energy consumption and improve the environment, Eagle County established their own efficient building code (ECO-Green Build) which applies to all new construction and renovations/additions over 50% of the existing floor area of single-family and multifamily residences, and commercial buildings.

289

Benton County | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Benton County Benton County Place Tennessee Utility Id 1578 Utility Location Yes Ownership M NERC Location SERC NERC SERC Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png GSA 1 General Power Commercial GSA 2 General Power Commercial GSA 3 General Power Commercial GSB Industrial General Power Service- TDGSA-VULCAN Industrial Outdoor Lighting Service Lighting RS Residential Residential SMSB Industrial SMSC Industrial SMSD Industrial WS-DE Commercial WS-MTOU Wholesale Average Rates Residential: $0.1030/kWh Commercial: $0.1110/kWh Industrial: $0.0875/kWh References

290

R[CIPIENT:Loudoun County  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Loudoun County Loudoun County u.s. DEPARTl\ IENT OF ENER GY EERE PROJECT MANAG EMENT CENTER NEPA DETERl\lINATION PROJEcr TITLE: EECBG Funded Projects - SOW (S) Page I of2 STATE: VA Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Pr(l(urement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number elD Number DE-EEOO00868 0 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 45t.IA), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: B5.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical assistance to individuals (such as builders, owners, consultants, designers), organizations (such as utilities), and state

291

R[CIPIENT:Pima County  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Pima County Pima County u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERlHINATION PROJECf TITLE: Activity#13 Garage and Shops Page 1 01'2 STATE: AZ. Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number em Number DE-FOA-OOOOD13 DE-EEOOO08S2 GFO-O000852-OO8 0 Based on my review orlhe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA CompliJmce Officer (authorized under DOE Order 45I.1A), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 85.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of polentiatly harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical

292

RECIPIENT:Chesterfield County PROJECT TITLE: EECBG Lighting Retrofit  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Chesterfield County Chesterfield County PROJECT TITLE: EECBG Lighting Retrofit Page 1 of2 STATE: VA Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-FOA-0000013 DE-EE0000874 GFO-0000874-001 0 Based 011 my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A), I have made the following determination: CX, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering (including, but not limited to, literature surveys, inventories, audits), data analysis (including computer modeling), document preparation (such as conceptual design or feasibility studies, analytical energy supply and demand studies), and dissemination (including, but not limited to, document mailings, publication, and distribution;

293

The Committee met in the Clark Room of the Capitol Holiday Inn...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

greatest interest. To spur this development the Board has sponsored meetings with major energy opinion-makers around town, including representatives from the Federal agencies,...

294

EIS-0461: Hyde County Wind Energy Center Project, Hyde and Buffalo...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

here Home EIS-0461: Hyde County Wind Energy Center Project, Hyde and Buffalo Counties, South Dakota EIS-0461: Hyde County Wind Energy Center Project, Hyde and Buffalo Counties,...

295

Franklin County Wind LLC | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Franklin County Wind LLC Franklin County Wind LLC Facility Franklin County Wind Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner Franklin County Wind LLC Developer Franklin County Wind LLC Energy Purchaser Merchant (MISO) Location Franklin County IA Coordinates 42.61481487°, -93.36564124° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":42.61481487,"lon":-93.36564124,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

296

Talbot County DPW | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Talbot County DPW Talbot County DPW Jump to: navigation, search Name Talbot County DPW Facility Talbot County DPW Sector Wind energy Facility Type Community Wind Facility Status In Service Owner Talbot County DPW Energy Purchaser Talbot County DPW Location Easton MD Coordinates 38.8182443°, -76.0331583° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":38.8182443,"lon":-76.0331583,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

297

Montgomery County - Green Power Purchasing | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Montgomery County - Green Power Purchasing Montgomery County - Green Power Purchasing Montgomery County - Green Power Purchasing < Back Eligibility Local Government Savings Category Bioenergy Buying & Making Electricity Solar Water Wind Program Info State Maryland Program Type Green Power Purchasing Provider Montgomery County In October 2000, a group six county agencies, consisting of Montgomery County, Montgomery County Public Schools, Montgomery County Housing Opportunities Commission, Montgomery College, the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission, and the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, began purchasing power on a competitive basis. In March 2003, the county's energy policy was amended to incorporate the purchase of renewable energy and to expand energy-efficiency efforts. This resolution

298

Development of an ozone climatology for Harris County, Texas  

SciTech Connect

The Houston Regional Monitoring Corporation (HRM) has performed continuous ambient air quality and meteorological monitoring in the Ship Channel area of east Harris County since August 1981. The HRM monitoring network is one of the largest Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) monitoring network in the United States operated by an industrial group. As an adjunct to its monitoring. HRM has funded extensive meteorological and statistical analyses of ozone monitoring data in Harris County. One of the goals of these studies was to determine those meteorological conditions responsible for the formation of elevated ozone concentrations in Harris County. The analyses performed included the use of principal component analysis and cluster analysis. These analysis techniques have individually been applied to ozone and air quality research problems. The combined use of these techniques in this analysis, however, is a unique application of these statistical tools to an ozone air quality analysis. As a result of these analyses, a climatology of those episodes conducive to elevated ozone formation in Harris County was developed.

Balentine, H.W.; Carter, J.C. (Radian Corp., Austin, TX (USA)); Preston, J. (Tenneco Polymers, Houston, TX (US))

1987-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

299

Use of benthic invertebrate community structure and the sediment quality triad to evaluate metal-contaminated sediment in the upper Clark Fork River, Montana  

SciTech Connect

The upper Clark Fork River, above Flathead River, is contaminated with large amounts of As, Cd, Cu, Pb, Mn, and Zn ores from past mining activities. The contaminated area extends from the Butte and Anaconda area to at least 230 km downstream to Milltown Reservoir. Both the upper Clark Fork River and Milltown Reservoir have been designated as US Environmental Protection Agency Superfund sites because of metal-contaminated bottom sediments. The authors evaluated the impacts of past mining activities on the Clark Fork River ecosystem using benthic invertebrate community assessment, residue chemistry, and toxicity testing. Oligochaeta and Chironomidae generally accounted for over 90% of the benthic invertebrate community in the soft sediment depositional areas. Taxa of Oligochaeta and Chironomidae were predominantly pollution tolerant. Higher numbers of Chironomidae genera were present at stations with higher concentrations of metals in sediment identified as toxic by the amphipod Hyalella azteca in 28-d exposures. Frequency of mouthpart deformities in genera of Chironomidae was low and did not correspond to concentrations of metals in sediment. Total abundance of organisms/m[sup 2] did not correspond to concentrations of metals in the sediment samples. Chemical analyses, laboratory toxicity tests, and benthic community evaluations all provide evidence of metal-induced degradation to aquatic communities in both the reservoir and the river. Using a weight-of-evidence approach--the Sediment Quality Triad--provided good concurrence among measures of benthic community structure, sediment chemistry, and laboratory toxicity.

Canfield, T.J.; Kemble, N.E.; Brumbaugh, W.G.; Dwyer, F.J.; Ingersoll, C.G.; Fairchild, J.F. (National Biological Survey, Columbia, MO (United States). Midwest Science Center)

1994-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

300

Humboldt County RESCO Project | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

RESCO Project RESCO Project Jump to: navigation, search Name Humboldt County RESCO Project Agency/Company /Organization Redwood Coast Energy Authority Focus Area People and Policy, Renewable Energy, Biomass - Anaerobic Digestion, Biomass - Biofuels, Biomass, Biomass - Biomass Combustion, Biomass - Biomass Gasification, Biomass - Biomass Pyrolysis, Biomass - Landfill Gas, Solar, - Solar Pv, Biomass - Waste To Energy, Wind Phase Create a Vision Resource Type Technical report Availability Free - Publicly Available Publication Date 4/1/2010 Website http://cal-ires.ucdavis.edu/fi Locality Humboldt County References Humboldt County RESCO Project[1] Contents 1 Overview 2 Highlights 3 Environmental Aspects 4 Related Tools 5 References Overview This introductory document outline's Humboldt county's vision for a local

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "including clark county" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Aspen & Pitkin County - Renewable Energy Mitigation Program ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Buying & Making Electricity Water Heating Wind Program Information Colorado Program Type Building Energy Code The City of Aspen and Pitkin County have adopted the 2009...

302

County Land Preservation and Use Commissions (Iowa)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This ordinance creates Land Preservation and Use Commissions in each county to provide for the orderly use and development of land, to protect agricultural land from nonagricultural development,...

303

Charles County - Agricultural Preservation Districts - Renewable...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Type Siting & Permitting Charles County provides that producing energy "from solar, wind, biomass, and farm waste and residue crops" is a permitted agricultural use in areas...

304

Biostratigraphy of Jonah quadrangle, Williamson County, Texas.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

??This paper presents a zonation of the Austin chalk and the Burditt marl, divisions of the Austin group in the Jonah quadrangle, Williamson County, Texas. (more)

Marks, Edward, 1926-

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

305

Forrest County Geothermal Energy Project Geothermal Project ...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

of replacing the existing air cooled chiller with geothermal water to water chillers for energy savings at the Forrest County Multi Purpose Center. The project will also replace...

306

Building Green in Greensburg: Kiowa County Courthouse  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This poster highlights energy efficiency, renewable energy, and sustainable features of the renovated high-performing Kiowa County Courthouse building in Greensburg, Kansas.

307

Geothermal development plan: Pinal county  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Wells drilled in the county provide evidence of geothermal energy sufficient for process heat and space heating and cooling applications. Annual energy consumption was estimated for industries whose process heat requirements are less than 105/sup 0/C (221/sup 0/F). This information was then used to model the introduction of geothermal energy into the process heat market. Also, agriculture and agribusiness industries were identified. Many of these are located on or near a geothermal resource and might be able to utilize geothermal energy in their operations.

White, D.H.

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

308

Richmond City County, Virginia: Energy Resources | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

City County is a county in Virginia. Its FIPS County Code is 760. It is classified as ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Number 4 Climate Zone Subtype A. Retrieved from "http:...

309

Bristol County, Rhode Island: Energy Resources | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County is a county in Rhode Island. Its FIPS County Code is 001. It is classified as ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Number 5 Climate Zone Subtype A. Registered Energy Companies in...

310

2008 Florida Youth Tobacco Survey, County Data Book  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Tobacco Survey County Data Book Florida Department of HealthFlorida County FYTS Data Book Map 2. Percentage of FloridaFlorida County FYTS Data Book Map 3. Percentage of Florida

Florida Department of Health, Brueau of Epidemiology; Crist, Charlie; Viamonte Ros, Ana M M.D., M.P.H.

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

311

Geothermal development issues: Recommendations to Deschutes County  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report discusses processes and issues related to geothermal development. It is intended to inform planners and interested individuals in Deschutes County about geothermal energy, and advise County officials as to steps that can be taken in anticipation of resource development. (ACR)

Gebhard, C.

1982-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

312

Factors influencing county level household fuelwood use  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This study explains household fuelwood consumption behavior at the county level by linking it to economic and demographic conditions in counties. Using this link, counties are identified where potential fuelwood use problems and benefits are greatest. A probit equation estimates household probability of wood use (percent woodburners in a county heating degree days, household income, nonwood fuel price, fuelwood price, percent forest land, population density, and fraction of households using various types of heating equipment. A linear-in-parameters equation estimates average wood consumed by a woodburner based on county heating degree days, household income, percent forest land, and price of nonwood fuel divided by fuelwood price. Parameters are estimated using fuelwood use data for individual households from a 1908-81 nationwide survey. The probit equation predicts percentage of wood burns well over a wide range of county conditions. The wood consumption equation overpredicts for counties with high income and high population density (over 6000 persons per square mile). The model shows average woodburning per household over all households decreases with increasing population density, and the influence of county economic characteristics varies with density.

Skog, K.E.

1986-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

313

CX-004861: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

61: Categorical Exclusion Determination 61: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-004861: Categorical Exclusion Determination Renewable Energy Initiative for Clark County, Nevada CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 12/29/2010 Location(s): Clark County, Nevada Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office Clark County, Nevada proposes to use federal funding to provide solar energy technology education through the use of demonstration. Clark County will partner with the University of Nevada, Las Vegas - Center for Energy Research to select a feasible site, technology type, and installation of infrastructure. Infrastructure included in this project will be a modular classroom and restrooms as well as solar panels. DOCUMENT(S) AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD CX-004861.pdf More Documents & Publications

314

EA-1852: Cloud County Community College Wind Energy Project, Cloud County,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2: Cloud County Community College Wind Energy Project, Cloud 2: Cloud County Community College Wind Energy Project, Cloud County, Kansas EA-1852: Cloud County Community College Wind Energy Project, Cloud County, Kansas Summary This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of a proposal to authorize the expenditure of federal funds by Cloud County Community College (CCCC) for a wind energy project. CCCC has installed three wind turbines and proposes to install a fourth turbine on their campus in Concordia, Kansas, for use in their wind energy training curriculum and to provide electricity for their campus. Public Comment Opportunities No public comment opportunities available at this time. Documents Available for Download January 10, 2011 EA-1852: Notice of Scoping Cloud County Community College Wind Energy Technology Project, Cloud

315

SHASTA COUNTY The Shasta County Jail is a 115,035 square-foot facility located in Redding. Built in  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

SHASTA COUNTY The Shasta County Jail is a 115,035 square-foot facility located in Redding. Built in 1984, this facility has an 11-story jail wing attached to a two-story County administrative wing

316

Dane County Landfill | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Dane County Landfill Dane County Landfill Jump to: navigation, search Name Dane County Landfill Facility Dane County Landfill #2 Rodefeld Sector Biomass Facility Type Landfill Gas Location Dane County, Wisconsin Coordinates 43.0186073°, -89.5497632° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":43.0186073,"lon":-89.5497632,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

317

Environmental assessment: Deaf Smith County site, Texas  

SciTech Connect

In February 1983, the US Department of Energy (DOE) identified a location in Deaf Smith County, Texas, as one of nine potentially acceptable sites for a mined geologic repository for spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. To determine their suitability, the Deaf Smith County site and the eight other potentially sites have been evaluated in accordance with the DOE's General Guidelines for the Recommendation of Sites for the Nuclear Waste Repositories. The Deaf Smith County site is in the Permian Basin, which is one of five distinct geohydrologic settings considered for the first repository. On the basis of the evaluations reported in this EA, the DOE has found that the Deaf Smith County site is not disqualified under the guidelines. On the basis of these findings, the DOE is nominating the Deaf Smith County site as one of the five sites suitable for characterization. 591 refs., 147 figs., 173 tabs.

1986-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

318

Grundy County Rural Elec Coop | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County Rural Elec Coop Jump to: navigation, search Name Grundy County Rural Elec Coop Place Iowa Utility Id 7864 Utility Location Yes Ownership C NERC Location MRO Activity...

319

RECIPIENT:Utah County STATE: UT PROJECT TITLE:  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Utah County STATE: UT PROJECT TITLE: EECBG - Utah County Energy Efficiency Retrofits Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number cm...

320

Florida County Helping Homeowners Save Energy and Money | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Florida County Helping Homeowners Save Energy and Money Florida County Helping Homeowners Save Energy and Money March 9, 2011 - 1:23pm Addthis Jennifer Holman Project Officer,...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "including clark county" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Elko County School District District Heating Low Temperature...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County School District District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Elko County School District District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal...

322

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: St. Lucie County, Florida  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

*Progress is reported through December 2012. Learn more about earlier program milestones Solar and Energy Loan Fund Location: St. Lucie County; Brevard County; City of Fellsmere;...

323

4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - February 2008 Jump to: navigation, search EIA Monthly Electric Utility Sales and Revenue Data for 4-County...

324

Luce County, Michigan: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Climate Zone Number 7 Climate Zone Subtype A. Places in Luce County, Michigan Newberry, Michigan Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleLuceCounty,Michiga...

325

Rebuilding it Better: Greensburg, Kansas, Kiowa County Memorial...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

it Better: Greensburg, Kansas, Kiowa County Memorial Hospital (Brochure) (Revised) Rebuilding it Better: Greensburg, Kansas, Kiowa County Memorial Hospital (Brochure) (Revised)...

326

Broward County - Green Building Policy | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Broward County - Green Building Policy Broward County - Green Building Policy Eligibility Local Government Savings For Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial...

327

A Design-Builder's Perspective: Anaerobic Digestion, Forest County...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A Design-Builder's Perspective: Anaerobic Digestion, Forest County Potawatomi Community - A Case Study A Design-Builder's Perspective: Anaerobic Digestion, Forest County Potawatomi...

328

Broward County - Green Building Policy | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Administration Other Agencies You are here Home Savings Broward County - Green Building Policy Broward County - Green Building Policy Eligibility Local Government...

329

Carroll County - Green Building Property Tax Credit | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Administration Other Agencies You are here Home Savings Carroll County - Green Building Property Tax Credit Carroll County - Green Building Property Tax Credit...

330

Antu County Hengxin Hydro Power Development Co Ltd | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Up Search Page Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon Antu County Hengxin Hydro Power Development Co Ltd Jump to: navigation, search Name Antu County Hengxin Hydro...

331

Cutting Electricity Costs in Miami-Dade County, Florida | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sites Power Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home Cutting Electricity Costs in Miami-Dade County, Florida Cutting Electricity Costs in Miami-Dade County,...

332

Vascular Flora of the Rocky Flats Area, Jefferson County, Colorado...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Vascular Flora of the Rocky Flats Area, Jefferson County, Colorado, USA Vascular Flora of the Rocky Flats Area, Jefferson County, Colorado, USA August 2010 Jody K. Nelson Vascular...

333

Pages that link to "Camas County, Idaho" | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Share this page on Facebook icon Twitter icon Pages that link to "Camas County, Idaho" Camas County, Idaho Jump to: navigation, search What links here Page: Camas...

334

Pages that link to "Bonner County, Idaho" | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Share this page on Facebook icon Twitter icon Pages that link to "Bonner County, Idaho" Bonner County, Idaho Jump to: navigation, search What links here Page: Bonner...

335

Pages that link to "Clearwater County, Idaho" | Open Energy Informatio...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

this page on Facebook icon Twitter icon Pages that link to "Clearwater County, Idaho" Clearwater County, Idaho Jump to: navigation, search What links here Page:...

336

Wabash County REMC - Residential Geothermal and Air-source Heat...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Other Agencies You are here Home Savings Wabash County REMC - Residential Geothermal and Air-source Heat Pump Rebate Program Wabash County REMC - Residential Geothermal...

337

White County REMC - Residential Geothermal Heat Pump Rebate Program...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Other Agencies You are here Home Savings White County REMC - Residential Geothermal Heat Pump Rebate Program White County REMC - Residential Geothermal Heat Pump Rebate...

338

Baltimore County - Property Tax Credit for Solar and Geothermal...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

You are here Home Savings Baltimore County - Property Tax Credit for Solar and Geothermal Devices (Maryland) Baltimore County - Property Tax Credit for Solar and Geothermal...

339

Anne Arundel County - Solar and Geothermal Equipment Property...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Other Agencies You are here Home Savings Anne Arundel County - Solar and Geothermal Equipment Property Tax Credit Anne Arundel County - Solar and Geothermal Equipment...

340

Anne Arundel County - Solar and Geothermal Equipment Property...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Other Agencies You are here Home Savings Anne Arundel County - Solar and Geothermal Equipment Property Tax Credits Anne Arundel County - Solar and Geothermal Equipment...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "including clark county" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Benton County, Tennessee ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Tennessee ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Benton County, Tennessee ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Number Climate...

342

Benton County, Minnesota ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Minnesota ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Benton County, Minnesota ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Number Climate...

343

Adams County, Pennsylvania ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Pennsylvania ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Adams County, Pennsylvania ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Number...

344

Benton County, Washington ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Benton County, Washington ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Number Climate...

345

EA-1097: Solid waste Disposal - Nevada Test Site, Nye County...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7: Solid waste Disposal - Nevada Test Site, Nye County, Nevada EA-1097: Solid waste Disposal - Nevada Test Site, Nye County, Nevada SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental...

346

Boulder County - EnergySmart Commercial Energy Efficiency Rebate...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Boulder County - EnergySmart Commercial Energy Efficiency Rebate Program (Colorado) Boulder County - EnergySmart Commercial Energy Efficiency Rebate Program (Colorado) Eligibility...

347

Boulder County - EnergySmart Residential Energy Efficiency Loan...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

to Summary by DSIRE 04302012 References DSIRE1 Summary Boulder County homeowners participating in the county's EnergySmart program may be eligible for microloans of...

348

Distributed energy resources at naval base ventura county building 1512  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Naval Base Ventura County Standby Generator OptimizationC&H Engineering performed a standby generator optimizationOn Naval Base Ventura County Standby Generator Optimization

Bailey, Owen C.; Marnay, Chris

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

349

Harris County - Green Building Tax Abatement for New Commercial...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Harris County - Green Building Tax Abatement for New Commercial Construction (Texas) Harris County - Green Building Tax Abatement for New Commercial Construction (Texas) < Back...

350

EA-1955: Campbell County Wind Project, Pollock, South Dakota...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Other Agencies You are here Home EA-1955: Campbell County Wind Project, Pollock, South Dakota EA-1955: Campbell County Wind Project, Pollock, South Dakota SUMMARY DOE's...

351

EIS-0376: White Wind Farm Brookings County, South Dakota | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Other Agencies You are here Home EIS-0376: White Wind Farm Brookings County, South Dakota EIS-0376: White Wind Farm Brookings County, South Dakota Summary This EIS...

352

Pages that link to "Codington County, South Dakota" | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Share this page on Facebook icon Twitter icon Pages that link to "Codington County, South Dakota" Codington County, South Dakota Jump to: navigation, search What links...

353

Los Alamos County Completes Abiquiu Hydropower Project, Bringing...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Alamos County Completes Abiquiu Hydropower Project, Bringing New Clean Energy Resources to New Mexico Los Alamos County Completes Abiquiu Hydropower Project, Bringing New Clean...

354

EA-1812: Haxtun Wind Energy Project, Logan and Phillips County...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

12: Haxtun Wind Energy Project, Logan and Phillips County, Colorado EA-1812: Haxtun Wind Energy Project, Logan and Phillips County, Colorado Summary This EA evaluates the...

355

Rural migration in Nevada: Lincoln County. Phase 1, 1992--1993  

SciTech Connect

The principal objective of this project was to develop insight into the scope of migration of working age Nevadans out of their county of birth; including the collection of data on their skill levels, desire to out or in-migrate, interactions between families of migratory persons, and the impact that the proposed high-level nuclear waste repository at Yucca mountain might have on their individual, and collective, decisions to migrate and return. The initial phase of this project reported here was conducted in 1992 and 1993 in Lincoln County, Nevada, one of the counties designated as ``affected`` by the proposed repository program. The findings suggest that a serious out-migration problem exists in Lincoln County, and that the Yucca mountain project will likely affect decisions relating to migration patterns in the future.

Soden, D.L.; Carns, D.E.; Mosser, D.; Conary, J.S.; Ansell, J.P.

1993-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

356

Miami-Dade County - Targeted Jobs Incentive Fund | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

You are here You are here Home » Miami-Dade County - Targeted Jobs Incentive Fund Miami-Dade County - Targeted Jobs Incentive Fund < Back Eligibility Industrial Installer/Contractor Savings Category Commercial Heating & Cooling Manufacturing Buying & Making Electricity Solar Program Info Start Date 5/2005 State Florida Program Type Industry Recruitment/Support Rebate Amount Varies The Targeted Jobs Incentive Fund (TJIF) provides financial incentives for select industries, including solar thermal and photovoltaic manufacturing, installation and repair companies that are relocating or expanding within Miami-Dade County. To be eligible, new or expanding companies relocating to Miami-Dade County must create at least 10 new jobs and make a capital improvement of at least $3 million.

357

Costilla County Biodiesel Pilot Project  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Costilla County Biodiesel Pilot Project has demonstrated the compatibility of biodiesel technology and economics on a local scale. The project has been committed to making homegrown biodiesel a viable form of community economic development. The project has benefited by reducing risks by building the facility gradually and avoiding large initial outlays of money for facilities and technologies. A primary advantage of this type of community-scale biodiesel production is that it allows for a relatively independent, local solution to fuel production. Successfully using locally sourced feedstocks and putting the fuel into local use emphasizes the feasibility of different business models under the biodiesel tent and that there is more than just a one size fits all template for successful biodiesel production.

Doon, Ben; Quintana, Dan

2011-08-25T23:59:59.000Z

358

One Grant, Nine Energy Efficiency Programs for Illinois County | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

One Grant, Nine Energy Efficiency Programs for Illinois County One Grant, Nine Energy Efficiency Programs for Illinois County One Grant, Nine Energy Efficiency Programs for Illinois County August 3, 2010 - 12:32pm Addthis The Kane County Judicial Center is one building that received retrofits to save the county energy with a Recovery Act-funded block grant. | Photo courtesy of Kane County The Kane County Judicial Center is one building that received retrofits to save the county energy with a Recovery Act-funded block grant. | Photo courtesy of Kane County Joshua DeLung What are the key facts? $2.2 million Recovery Act grant awarded to Kane County, Illinios. $150,000 estimated annual savings from retrofits at county buildings 424,000 square feet of building to be retrofitted West of Chicago, one Illinois municipality is putting its $2.2 million

359

One Grant, Nine Energy Efficiency Programs for Illinois County | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

One Grant, Nine Energy Efficiency Programs for Illinois County One Grant, Nine Energy Efficiency Programs for Illinois County One Grant, Nine Energy Efficiency Programs for Illinois County August 3, 2010 - 12:32pm Addthis The Kane County Judicial Center is one building that received retrofits to save the county energy with a Recovery Act-funded block grant. | Photo courtesy of Kane County The Kane County Judicial Center is one building that received retrofits to save the county energy with a Recovery Act-funded block grant. | Photo courtesy of Kane County Joshua DeLung What are the key facts? $2.2 million Recovery Act grant awarded to Kane County, Illinios. $150,000 estimated annual savings from retrofits at county buildings 424,000 square feet of building to be retrofitted West of Chicago, one Illinois municipality is putting its $2.2 million

360

Category:County Climate Zones | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County Climate Zones County Climate Zones Jump to: navigation, search This category contains county climate zone information in the United States of America. Contents: Top - 0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Pages in category "County Climate Zones" The following 200 pages are in this category, out of 3,141 total. (previous 200) (next 200) A Abbeville County, South Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Acadia Parish, Louisiana ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Accomack County, Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Ada County, Idaho ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Adair County, Iowa ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Adair County, Kentucky ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Adair County, Missouri ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Adair County, Oklahoma ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "including clark county" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Value distribution assessment of geothermal development in Lake County, CA  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

A value distribution assessment is defined as the determination of the distribution of benefits and costs of a proposed or actual development, with the intent of comparing such a development with alternative plans. Included are not only the social and economic effects, but also people's perceptions of their roles and how they are affected by the proposed or actual development. Discussion is presented under the following section headings: on morality and ethics; the vanishing community; case study of pre-development planning--Lake County; methodology for research; Lake County geothermal energy resource; decision making; Planning Commission hearing; communication examples; benefit tracing; response to issues raised by the report of the State Geothermal Task Force; and, conclusions and recommendations. (JGB)

Churchman, C.W.; Nelson, H.G.; Eacret, K.

1977-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

362

Michigan County's Energy Upgrades Back on Track  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Qhen officials in Michigans Shiawassee County were faced with fiscal challenges, they had no choice but to put off recommendations from a 2007 report highlighting energy problems at county government buildings. But after receiving an Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) worth $302,000 from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and $900,000 in low-interest bonds with the government, the county is giving the report a second look.

363

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County Training Makes All  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Fayette County Fayette County Training Makes All the Difference for Pennsylvania Business Owner to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County Training Makes All the Difference for Pennsylvania Business Owner on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County Training Makes All the Difference for Pennsylvania Business Owner on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County Training Makes All the Difference for Pennsylvania Business Owner on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County Training Makes All the Difference for Pennsylvania Business Owner on Delicious Rank Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County Training Makes All the Difference for Pennsylvania Business Owner on Digg

364

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Santa Barbara County, California  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Santa Barbara Santa Barbara County, California to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Santa Barbara County, California on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Santa Barbara County, California on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Santa Barbara County, California on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Santa Barbara County, California on Delicious Rank Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Santa Barbara County, California on Digg Find More places to share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Santa Barbara County, California on AddThis.com... Better Buildings Residential Network Progress Stories Interviews Videos Events Quick Links to Partner Information AL | AZ | CA | CO | CT FL | GA | IL | IN | LA

365

Linn County Rural Electric Cooperative - Residential Energy Efficiency  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Linn County Rural Electric Cooperative - Residential Energy Linn County Rural Electric Cooperative - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program Linn County Rural Electric Cooperative - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program < Back Eligibility Residential Savings Category Home Weatherization Commercial Weatherization Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Cooling Appliances & Electronics Construction Design & Remodeling Sealing Your Home Windows, Doors, & Skylights Ventilation Heat Pumps Commercial Lighting Lighting Water Heating Program Info State Iowa Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount Varies by technology Provider Linn County Rural Electric Cooperative Association Linn County Rural Electric Cooperative Association (Linn County RECA) is a member-owned cooperative. To encourage energy efficiency, Linn County

366

Countries Gasoline Prices Including Taxes  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Countries (U.S. dollars per gallon, including taxes) Countries (U.S. dollars per gallon, including taxes) Date Belgium France Germany Italy Netherlands UK US 01/13/14 7.83 7.76 7.90 8.91 8.76 8.11 3.68 01/06/14 8.00 7.78 7.94 8.92 8.74 8.09 3.69 12/30/13 NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.68 12/23/13 NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.63 12/16/13 7.86 7.79 8.05 9.00 8.78 8.08 3.61 12/9/13 7.95 7.81 8.14 8.99 8.80 8.12 3.63 12/2/13 7.91 7.68 8.07 8.85 8.68 8.08 3.64 11/25/13 7.69 7.61 8.07 8.77 8.63 7.97 3.65 11/18/13 7.99 7.54 8.00 8.70 8.57 7.92 3.57 11/11/13 7.63 7.44 7.79 8.63 8.46 7.85 3.55 11/4/13 7.70 7.51 7.98 8.70 8.59 7.86 3.61 10/28/13 8.02 7.74 8.08 8.96 8.79 8.04 3.64 10/21/13 7.91 7.71 8.11 8.94 8.80 8.05 3.70 10/14/13 7.88 7.62 8.05 8.87 8.74 7.97 3.69

367

Forsyth County Slashes Energy Bills with Upgrades | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Forsyth County Slashes Energy Bills with Upgrades Forsyth County Slashes Energy Bills with Upgrades Forsyth County Slashes Energy Bills with Upgrades September 30, 2010 - 12:04pm Addthis A new energy management system in Forsyth County’s 52,057 square foot courthouse is expected to save about $9,000 annually. | Photo courtesy of Forsyth County A new energy management system in Forsyth County's 52,057 square foot courthouse is expected to save about $9,000 annually. | Photo courtesy of Forsyth County Maya Payne Smart Former Writer for Energy Empowers, EERE What are the key facts? Four large projects funded through Recovery Act grant Energy efficient retrofits to save county about $72,000 annually Forsyth County, Georgia has been among the nation's fastest growing counties for the past ten years. Given the growth, officials are working

368

Forsyth County Slashes Energy Bills with Upgrades | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Forsyth County Slashes Energy Bills with Upgrades Forsyth County Slashes Energy Bills with Upgrades Forsyth County Slashes Energy Bills with Upgrades September 30, 2010 - 12:04pm Addthis A new energy management system in Forsyth County’s 52,057 square foot courthouse is expected to save about $9,000 annually. | Photo courtesy of Forsyth County A new energy management system in Forsyth County's 52,057 square foot courthouse is expected to save about $9,000 annually. | Photo courtesy of Forsyth County Maya Payne Smart Former Writer for Energy Empowers, EERE What are the key facts? Four large projects funded through Recovery Act grant Energy efficient retrofits to save county about $72,000 annually Forsyth County, Georgia has been among the nation's fastest growing counties for the past ten years. Given the growth, officials are working

369

Report of the Dutchess County Resource Recovery Task Force  

SciTech Connect

In 1978, Dutchess County received a grant from DOE relating to the development of a resource-recovery system for the county. The program objectives were: (1) to recover energy-intensive materials; (2) to recover energy from the waste in the form of a medium-Btu fuel gas or other useful energy form; and (3) to effect a dramatic reduction in the quantity of solids to be disposed of in a landfill. Task I involved project management planning, including the assembling of a team and the development of a decision/milestone plan for implementation. Task II involved the confirmation of the conceptual design of a Union Carbide Purox pyrolysis facility. The study was to concentrate on siting of the facility, verification of waste quantities available for processing, and net processing costs based on current projected revenues versus facility construction and operating costs. A review of the work to the completion of the Task Force evaluation and recommendations made by the Dutchess County Resource Task Force are given. General recommendations for the proposed resource-recovery facility are to have: a sufficient and controlled waste stream, a recovered-energy customer, and a facility that is strategically located, reliable, and efficient. (MCW)

Not Available

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

370

Story County Wind Farm | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County Wind Farm County Wind Farm Facility Story County Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner NextEra Energy Resources Developer NextEra Energy Resources Location Story and Hardin Counties IA Coordinates 42.301351°, -93.45156° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":42.301351,"lon":-93.45156,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

371

Recipient: County of San Bernadino,CA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Recipient: County of San Bernadino,CA Recipient: County of San Bernadino,CA Award #: EE 000 0903 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Plan Environmental Impact Report (EECS) A9, All None - this NEPA determination is for the report only. Solar Electric System for Rancho Cucamonga County Office Building A9, All Waste Stream Clause Historic Preservation Clause Engineering Clause **This NEPA determination is limited to a roof-mounted system only. County Heating Ventilation and Air-Condition (HVAC) Retrofit Program B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Historic Preservation Clause Engineering clause Solar Electric System for High Desert Government Center

372

Montgomery County to the Rescue! - Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Montgomery County to the Rescue! Montgomery County to the Rescue! Summary Scenario Student Pages Index of Projects Subject: Investigating Ethnic/Cultural Diversity in the Community Grade Level: 2 Abstract: The hometown of the Power Rangers, popular TV and movie action characters, has been destroyed by evil forces. The Rangers post an Internet plea for help in locating a new home base that is ethnically and culturally diverse. In order to convince the Rangers to adopt Montgomery County as their new home base, students must find out specific facts about different ethnic and cultural groups in the community, and present these facts in a persuasive case to the Rangers. Students use the Internet and e-mail to obtain current facts about Montgomery County, and send their invitation back to the Rangers.

373

Los Alamos County | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Alamos County Alamos County Place New Mexico Utility Id 11204 Utility Location Yes Ownership M NERC Location WECC NERC WECC Yes Operates Generating Plant Yes Activity Generation Yes Activity Distribution Yes Activity Wholesale Marketing Yes Activity Retail Marketing Yes Activity Bundled Services Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] Energy Information Administration Form 826[2] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Area Lighting Service - Metered Commercial TOU Lighting Area Lighting Service - Metered County TOU Lighting Area Lighting Service - Metered Large Commercial Lighting Area Lighting Service - Metered Large County Lighting

374

Winona County Wind | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Winona County Wind Winona County Wind Jump to: navigation, search Name Winona County Wind Facility Winona County Wind Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner Juhl Wind Developer Juhl Wind Energy Purchaser NSP/Xcel Energy Location 3 miles northwest of Altura MN Coordinates 44.101281°, -91.975715° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":44.101281,"lon":-91.975715,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

375

Western Baldwin County, AL Grid Interconnection Project  

SciTech Connect

The Objective of this Project was to provide an additional supply of electricity to the affected portions of Baldwin County, AL through the purchase, installation, and operation of certain substation equipment.

Thomas DeBell

2011-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

376

Quaternary faulting of Deschutes County, Oregon.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

??Sixty-one normal faults were identified in a 53-kilometer long by 21-kilometer wide northwest-trending zone in central and northern Deschutes County, Oregon. The faults are within (more)

Wellik, John M.

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

377

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Eagle County, Colorado  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

VA WA | WI Eagle County, Colorado Three Resort Communities in Colorado Get Smart With Energy Upgrades Photo of a ski lodge with snow surrounding it. An image of a map of the...

378

Environmental assessment: Deaf Smith County site, Texas  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In February 1983, the US Department of Energy (DOE) identified a location in Deaf Smith County, Texas, as one of the nine potentially acceptable sites for mined geologic repository for spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. To determine their suitability, the Deaf Smith County site and eight other potentially acceptable sites have been evaluated in accordance with the DOE's General Guidelines for the Recommendation of Sites for the Nuclear Waste Repositories. The Deaf Smith County site is in the Permian Basin, which is one of five distinct geohydrologic settings considered for the first repository. On the basis of the evaluations reported in this EA, the DOE has found that the Deaf Smith County site is not disqualified under the guidelines.

Not Available

1986-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

379

County Employment Of West Virginia Higher  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

.................................................................................................1 Results By Region, County, And Summary Degree ................................................3 I: Detailed Description Of Employment Data .........................................26 Appendix II: List of Institutions, Degrees, And Areas Of Concentration................28 #12;List Of Tables 1

Mohaghegh, Shahab

380

Marin County- Wood Stove Replacement Rebate Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The County of Marin has created a rebate program to encourage homeowners to remove or replace non-EPA certified wood-burning heaters (wood stoves and fireplace inserts) with cleaner burning stoves...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "including clark county" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Energy Efficient County Buildings Realizing Money  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Efficient County Buildings Realizing Money and Energy-Saving Opportunities About IBTS IBTS is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that helps governments provide high-quality,...

382

County, Arizona RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for a double circuit upgrade along the existing Empire-EDS 11S-kV transmission line, Pinal County, Arizona RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION: Amendment No.2 A....

383

Inter-County Energy Efficiency Loan Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Inter-County Energy Cooperative offers loans for members that install Electric Thermal Storage units, geothermal and air-to-air heat pump heating and cooling equipment in their homes. Loans are...

384

Geothermal development plan: northern Arizona counties  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Northern Counties Area Development Plan evaluated the regional market potential for utilizing geothermal energy. This study identified five potential geothermal resource areas, four of which have low temperature (Arizona.

White, D.H.; Goldstone, L.A.

1982-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

385

County Solid Waste Control Act (Texas)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The purpose of this chapter is to authorize a cooperative effort by counties, public agencies, and other persons for the safe and economical collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste...

386

Fannin County Electric Coop | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Fannin County Electric Coop Fannin County Electric Coop Jump to: navigation, search Name Fannin County Electric Coop Place Texas Utility Id 6173 Utility Location Yes Ownership C NERC Location TRE NERC ERCOT Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Residential Residential Security Lighting-175 Watt Mercury Vapor Lighting Small Commercial Commercial Average Rates Residential: $0.1210/kWh Commercial: $0.1010/kWh Industrial: $0.1320/kWh References ↑ "EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a" Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Fannin_County_Electric_Coop&oldid=410679

387

Wolf Point Substation, Roosevelt County, Montana  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Western Area Power Administration (Western), an agency of the United States Department of Energy, is proposing to construct the 115-kV Wolf Point Substation near Wolf Point in Roosevelt County, Montana (Figure 1). As part of the construction project, Western's existing Wolf Point Substation would be taken out of service. The existing 115-kV Wolf Point Substation is located approximately 3 miles west of Wolf Point, Montana (Figure 2). The substation was constructed in 1949. The existing Wolf Point Substation serves as a Switching Station'' for the 115-kV transmission in the region. The need for substation improvements is based on operational and reliability issues. For this environmental assessment (EA), the environmental review of the proposed project took into account the removal of the old Wolf Point Substation, rerouting of the five Western lines and four lines from the Cooperatives and Montana-Dakota Utilities Company, and the new road into the proposed substation. Reference to the new proposed Wolf Point Substation in the EA includes these facilities as well as the old substation site. The environmental review looked at the impacts to all resource areas in the Wolf Point area. 7 refs., 6 figs.

Not Available

1991-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

388

Jared Clark-poster  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

The conversion of biomass (cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin) into transportation fuels by pyrolysis, gasification, and liquefaction processes involves pyrolysis as either the...

389

Cover story: Colin Clark  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Interview: Somerfield's security boss likes to keep infosecurity simple. He tells Eleanor Dallaway why he prefers to keep emails rather than block them, why Chip and PIN is a con and what is wrong with loyalty cards

Eleanor Dallaway

2007-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

390

Charles W. Clark  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Atomic electronic excitation in nuclear reactions. ... Towards Quantum Standards: A Workshop on Quantum Information Technology," The Royal ...

2011-10-03T23:59:59.000Z

391

Hennepin County`s experience with heavy-duty ethanol vehicles  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

From November 1993 to October 1996, Hennepin County, which includes Minneapolis, field-tested two heavy-duty snowplow/road maintenance trucks fueled by ethanol. The overall objective of this program was to collect data from original equipment manufacturer alternative fuel heavy-duty trucks, along with comparable data from a similarly configured diesel-powered vehicle, to establish economic, emissions, performance, and durability data for the alternative fuel technology. These ethanol trucks, along with an identical third truck equipped with a diesel engine, were operated year round to maintain the Hennepin county roads. In winter, the trucks were run in 8-hour shifts plowing and hauling snow from urban and suburban roads. For the rest of the year, the three trucks were used to repair and maintain these same roads. As a result of this project, a considerable amount of data was collected on E95 fuel use, as well as maintenance, repair, emissions, and operational characteristics. Maintenance and repair costs of the E95 trucks were considerably higher primarily due to fuel filter and fuel pump issues. From an emissions standpoint, the E95 trucks emitted less particulate matter and fewer oxides of nitrogen but more carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons. Overall, the E95 trucks operated as well as the diesel, as long as the fuel filters were changed frequently. This project was a success in that E95, a domestically produced fuel from a renewable energy source, was used in a heavy-duty truck application and performed the same rigorous tasks as the diesel counterparts. The drawbacks to E95 as a heavy-duty fuel take the form of higher operational costs, higher fuel costs, shorter range, and the lack of over-the-road infrastructure.

NONE

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

392

Toxicity of metal-contaminated sediments from the upper Clark Fork River, Montana, to aquatic invertebrates and fish in laboratory exposures  

SciTech Connect

Sediments of the upper Clark Fork River, from the Butte and Anaconda area to Milltown Reservoir (230 km downstream), are contaminated with As, Cd, Cu, Pb, Mn, and Zn primarily from mining activities. The toxicity of pore water from these sediments was determined using Daphnia magna, rainbow trout, and Microtox[reg sign]. However, pore-water data from these exposures were questionable because of changes in the toxicity of pore-water samples after 5 to 7 d of storage. Whole-sediment tests were conducted with Hyalella azteca, Chironomus riparius, rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) 21- to 28-d exposure and Daphnia magna. Sediment samples from Milltown Reservoir and the Clark Fork River were not generally lethal to test organisms. However, both reduced growth and delayed sexual maturation of amphipods were associated with exposure to elevated concentrations of metals in sediments from the reservoir and river. Relative sensitivity (most sensitive to least sensitive) of organisms in whole-sediment toxicity tests was: Hyalella azteca > Chironomus riparius > rainbow trout > Daphnia magna. Relative sensitivity (most sensitive to least sensitive) of the three end points evaluated with Hyalella azteca was: length > sexual maturation > survival. The lack of lethal effects on organisms may be related to temporal differences in sediment, acid-volatile sulfide, or organic carbon.

Kemble, N.E.; Brumbaugh, W.G.; Brunson, E.L.; Dwyer, F.J.; Ingersoll, C.G. (National Biological Survey, Columbia, MO (United States). Midwest Science Center); Monda, D.P. (Pyramid Lake Fisheries, Sutcliffe, NV (United States)); Woodward, D.F. (National Biological Survey, Jackson, WY (United States). Midwest Science Center)

1994-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

393

Category:Eagle County, CO | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Eagle County, CO Eagle County, CO Jump to: navigation, search Go Back to PV Economics By Location Media in category "Eagle County, CO" The following 16 files are in this category, out of 16 total. SVFullServiceRestaurant Eagle County CO Public Service Co of Colorado.png SVFullServiceRestauran... 63 KB SVMidriseApartment Eagle County CO Public Service Co of Colorado.png SVMidriseApartment Eag... 67 KB SVQuickServiceRestaurant Eagle County CO Public Service Co of Colorado.png SVQuickServiceRestaura... 63 KB SVSecondarySchool Eagle County CO Public Service Co of Colorado.png SVSecondarySchool Eagl... 68 KB SVStandAloneRetail Eagle County CO Public Service Co of Colorado.png SVStandAloneRetail Eag... 67 KB SVHospital Eagle County CO Public Service Co of Colorado.png SVHospital Eagle Count...

394

A Michigan County Unearths Savings with Geothermal Energy | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A Michigan County Unearths Savings with Geothermal Energy A Michigan County Unearths Savings with Geothermal Energy A Michigan County Unearths Savings with Geothermal Energy January 22, 2013 - 9:55am Addthis Kent County Correctional Facility is saving energy and money with a new closed-loop geothermal system. | Photo courtesy of Kent County Administrator's Office. Kent County Correctional Facility is saving energy and money with a new closed-loop geothermal system. | Photo courtesy of Kent County Administrator's Office. Christina Stowers Communications Specialist in the Office of Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program What are the key facts? Kent County Correctional Facility installed a 96-well geothermal system to help reduce its energy consumption. The new heating and cooling system is expected to save the county an

395

A Michigan County Unearths Savings with Geothermal Energy | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A Michigan County Unearths Savings with Geothermal Energy A Michigan County Unearths Savings with Geothermal Energy A Michigan County Unearths Savings with Geothermal Energy January 22, 2013 - 9:55am Addthis Kent County Correctional Facility is saving energy and money with a new closed-loop geothermal system. | Photo courtesy of Kent County Administrator's Office. Kent County Correctional Facility is saving energy and money with a new closed-loop geothermal system. | Photo courtesy of Kent County Administrator's Office. Christina Stowers Communications Specialist in the Office of Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program What are the key facts? Kent County Correctional Facility installed a 96-well geothermal system to help reduce its energy consumption. The new heating and cooling system is expected to save the county an

396

Baraga County, Michigan ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Baraga County, Michigan ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Baraga County, Michigan ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

397

Arthur County, Nebraska ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Page Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon Arthur County, Nebraska ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Arthur County, Nebraska...

398

Bee County, Texas ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Search Page Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon Bee County, Texas ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Bee County, Texas...

399

Berrien County, Georgia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Berrien County, Georgia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Berrien County, Georgia ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

400

Barbour County, Alabama ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Barbour County, Alabama ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Barbour County, Alabama ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "including clark county" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Banner County, Nebraska ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Banner County, Nebraska ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Banner County, Nebraska ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

402

Amelia County, Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Amelia County, Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Amelia County, Virginia ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

403

Andrew County, Missouri ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Andrew County, Missouri ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Andrew County, Missouri ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

404

Ashley County, Arkansas ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Page Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon Ashley County, Arkansas ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Ashley County, Arkansas...

405

Aroostook County, Maine ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Aroostook County, Maine ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Aroostook County, Maine ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

406

Bates County, Missouri ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Page Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon Bates County, Missouri ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Bates County, Missouri...

407

Baldwin County, Georgia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Baldwin County, Georgia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Baldwin County, Georgia ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

408

Adams County, Ohio ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Page Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon Adams County, Ohio ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Adams County, Ohio ASHRAE...

409

Alpena County, Michigan ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Alpena County, Michigan ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Alpena County, Michigan ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

410

Alcona County, Michigan ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Alcona County, Michigan ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Alcona County, Michigan ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

411

Belmont County, Ohio ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Page Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon Belmont County, Ohio ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Belmont County, Ohio...

412

Armstrong County, Texas ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Armstrong County, Texas ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Armstrong County, Texas ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

413

Atchison County, Kansas ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Atchison County, Kansas ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Atchison County, Kansas ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

414

Barnes County, North Dakota ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon Barnes County, North Dakota ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Barnes County, North...

415

Addison County, Vermont ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Addison County, Vermont ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Addison County, Vermont ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

416

Antrim County, Michigan ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Antrim County, Michigan ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Antrim County, Michigan ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

417

Adams County, North Dakota ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon Adams County, North Dakota ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Adams County, North...

418

Anoka County, Minnesota ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Anoka County, Minnesota ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Anoka County, Minnesota ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

419

Alachua County, Florida ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Alachua County, Florida ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Alachua County, Florida ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

420

Barton County, Missouri ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Barton County, Missouri ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Barton County, Missouri ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "including clark county" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Beaver County, Oklahoma ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Beaver County, Oklahoma ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Beaver County, Oklahoma ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

422

COMMENT BY ESMERALDA COUNTY, NEVADA RE PRICE-ANDERSON ACT | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

COMMENT BY ESMERALDA COUNTY, NEVADA RE PRICE-ANDERSON ACT COMMENT BY ESMERALDA COUNTY, NEVADA RE PRICE-ANDERSON ACT COMMENT BY ESMERALDA COUNTY, NEVADA CONCERNING THE CONTINUATION...

423

Heat flow in the Coso geothermal area, Inyo County, California | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

source source History View New Pages Recent Changes All Special Pages Semantic Search/Querying Get Involved Help Apps Datasets Community Login | Sign Up Search Page Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon » Heat flow in the Coso geothermal area, Inyo County, California Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Journal Article: Heat flow in the Coso geothermal area, Inyo County, California Details Activities (2) Areas (1) Regions (0) Abstract: Obvious surface manifestations of an anomalous concentration of geothermal resources at the Coso geothermal area, Inyo County, California, include fumarolic activity and associated hydrothermally altered rocks. Pleistocene volcanic rocks associated with the geothermal activity include 38 rhyolite domes occupying a north trending structural and topographic

424

RECIPIENT:Phillips County u.s DEPARTl\IENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAG  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Phillips County Phillips County u.s DEPARTl\IENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAG EM ENT CENTER NEPA DETE~IINATION PROJECT TITLE: CRED * Phillips County 30MW Wind Project Page 1 of2 STATE: CO Funding Opportunity Announcement NUffiMr DE-FOA-OCJ0122 Procurtmtnt Instrument Number DE-EEOOO3073 NEPA Control Number CID Numbn o Based on my rev iew of the information ('oncuoing the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 45I.1A), I bave made the following determination:. ex. EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: C12 Siting, construction , and operation of energy system prototypes including , but not limited to, wind resource, hydropower, geothermal , fossil fuel , biomass, and solar energy pilot projects. A9 Information gathering (including

425

Energy Savings Report For Dallas County, July 2000 June 2001  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This report presents the energy and dollar savings for the period July 2000 - June 2001 for 12 Dallas County facilities that have been retrofit by Enershop. The savings for this period total $745,046, which represent 73.2% of the audit estimated savings. The electric demand savings are $261,517 and the electric usage savings are $483,529. The savings have improved somewhat from the previous report that included the billing periods for April - June 2000. The savings for the earlier period were 62.6% of the audit estimated savings compared with 73.2% for the current period.

Claridge, D. E.; Baltazar-Cervantes, J. C.; Zhu, Y.

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

426

Gray County Wind Farm | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Gray County Wind Farm Gray County Wind Farm Jump to: navigation, search Name Gray County Wind Farm Facility Gray County Wind Farm Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner NextEra Energy Resources Developer NextEra Energy Resources Energy Purchaser Aquila Location Gray County KS Coordinates 37.5855°, -100.384° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":37.5855,"lon":-100.384,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

427

St. Louis County - Residential Energy Efficiency Loan Program | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

St. Louis County - Residential Energy Efficiency Loan Program St. Louis County - Residential Energy Efficiency Loan Program St. Louis County - Residential Energy Efficiency Loan Program < Back Eligibility Residential Savings Category Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Heating Home Weatherization Commercial Weatherization Cooling Sealing Your Home Design & Remodeling Windows, Doors, & Skylights Ventilation Manufacturing Heat Pumps Appliances & Electronics Commercial Lighting Lighting Insulation Water Heating Maximum Rebate $15,000 Program Info Funding Source St. Louis County State Missouri Program Type Local Loan Program Rebate Amount $2,500-$15,000 Provider St. Louis County St. Louis County SAVES offers loans to residents for energy efficiency improvements in owner-occupied, single-family homes. Loans are available

428

Quad County Corn Processors | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Quad County Corn Processors Quad County Corn Processors Jump to: navigation, search Name Quad County Corn Processors Place Galva, Iowa Zip 51020 Product Farmer owned corn processing facility management company. Coordinates 38.38422°, -97.537539° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":38.38422,"lon":-97.537539,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

429

Brown County Wind | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Brown County Wind Brown County Wind Facility Brown County Wind Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner Adams Electric Cooperative Developer Adams Electric Cooperative Energy Purchaser Adams Electric Cooperative Location Mt. Sterling IL Coordinates 39.97340387°, -90.69939137° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":39.97340387,"lon":-90.69939137,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

430

Northern Wasco County PUD | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County PUD County PUD Jump to: navigation, search Name Northern Wasco County PUD Place Oregon Utility Id 13788 Utility Location Yes Ownership P NERC Location WECC NERC WECC Yes Operates Generating Plant Yes Activity Generation Yes Activity Transmission Yes Activity Buying Transmission Yes Activity Distribution Yes Activity Wholesale Marketing Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png COMMERCIAL DEMAND RATE - Schedule 250 Commercial COMMERCIAL PRIMARY SERVICE - Schedule 300 Commercial Commercial Commercial Residential Residential Average Rates Residential: $0.0581/kWh

431

Lincoln County Wind Farms | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Name Lincoln County Wind Farms Facility Lincoln County Wind Farms Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner Jay Gislason Developer Diversified Energy Solutions Energy Purchaser Otter Tail Power Location Lincoln County MN Coordinates 44.4039°, -96.2646° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":44.4039,"lon":-96.2646,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

432

Dunn County Electric Coop | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Dunn County Electric Coop Dunn County Electric Coop Place Wisconsin Utility Id 5417 Utility Location Yes Ownership C NERC Location MRO NERC RFC Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Dusk/Dawn Lighting HPS 100 W Lighting Industrial Industrial Residential Residential Average Rates Residential: $0.1210/kWh Commercial: $0.1030/kWh Industrial: $0.0716/kWh References ↑ "EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a" Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Dunn_County_Electric_Coop&oldid=410605" Categories: EIA Utility Companies and Aliases

433

Yuba County Water Agency | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Yuba County Water Agency Yuba County Water Agency Place California Utility Id 21140 Utility Location Yes Ownership P NERC Location WECC NERC WECC Yes ISO CA Yes Operates Generating Plant Yes Activity Wholesale Marketing Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png No rate schedules available. Average Rates No Rates Available References ↑ "EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a" Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Yuba_County_Water_Agency&oldid=412223" Categories: EIA Utility Companies and Aliases Utility Companies Organizations

434

Solano County Wind Farm | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Farm Farm Jump to: navigation, search Name Solano County Wind Farm Facility Solano County Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Developer Kenetech Windpower Energy Purchaser Pacific Gas & Electric Co Location Solano County CA Coordinates 38.1535°, -121.858° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":38.1535,"lon":-121.858,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

435

Franklin County Wind Project | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Franklin County Wind Project Franklin County Wind Project Facility Franklin County Sector Wind energy Facility Type Community Wind Coordinates 37.014702°, -79.895096° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":37.014702,"lon":-79.895096,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

436

Crisp County Power Comm | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Crisp County Power Comm Crisp County Power Comm Jump to: navigation, search Name Crisp County Power Comm Place Georgia Utility Id 4538 Utility Location Yes Ownership P NERC Location SERC NERC SERC Yes Operates Generating Plant Yes Activity Generation Yes Activity Distribution Yes Activity Retail Marketing Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Agriculture Process Service Commercial Farm Service Commercial Fuel Cost Recovery Schedule- Primary Distribution Commercial Fuel Cost Recovery Schedule- Secondary Distribution Commercial Fuel Cost Recovery Schedule- Transmission Commercial

437

Ralls County Electric Coop | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County Electric Coop County Electric Coop Jump to: navigation, search Name Ralls County Electric Coop Place Missouri Utility Id 15672 Utility Location Yes Ownership C NERC Location SERC NERC SERC Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Dual Fuel General Service Large - Over 300 kW Geothermal Heat Pump Large Power (100 kW to 300 kW) Security Light Lighting Single Phase Under 100 kW Three Phase Under 100 kW Average Rates Residential: $0.1240/kWh Commercial: $0.1060/kWh Industrial: $0.0596/kWh References ↑ "EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a"

438

Mississippi County Electric Coop | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County Electric Coop County Electric Coop Jump to: navigation, search Name Mississippi County Electric Coop Place Arkansas Utility Id 12681 Utility Location Yes Ownership C NERC Location SERC NERC SERC Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] Energy Information Administration Form 826[2] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Load Control of Irrigation Service I - Alternate Commercial Load Control of Irrigation Service II - Alternate Commercial Rate # 11-- Industrial Power Service Industrial Rate #1- Single Service Residential Rate #2- Three Phase Service Under 50 kW Commercial Rate #3- Large Commercial Service Commercial

439

Appling County Pellets | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Appling County Pellets Appling County Pellets Jump to: navigation, search Name Appling County Pellets Place Graham, Georgia Zip 31513 Sector Biomass Product Producer of wood pellets and other biomass products located in Georgia. Coordinates 47.055765°, -122.294774° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.055765,"lon":-122.294774,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

440

Source: Office of Institutional Research, Assessment and Planning: OIT frozen database on 09/2010 and the David A. Clark School of Law, Office of the Registrar, 2010 Fall 2010 FALL SEMESTER UNDERGRADUATE, GRADUATE, COMMUNITY COLLEGE AND LAW SCHOOL STUDENT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

UNDERGRADUATE, GRADUATE, COMMUNITY COLLEGE AND LAW SCHOOL STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROFILE* TOTAL ENROLLMENT Number/2010 and the David A. Clark School of Law, Office of the Registrar, 2010 Fall Semester. ENROLLMENT BY ACADEMIC LOAD-degree students FULL-TIME CONTINUING FACULTY PROFILE1 : RANK: Headcount Percentage Professor 81 35.1 Associate

District of Columbia, University of the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "including clark county" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Energy Efficient Buildings, Salt Lake County, Utah  

SciTech Connect

Executive Summary Salt Lake County's Solar Photovoltaic Project - an unprecedented public/private partnership Salt Lake County is pleased to announce the completion of its unprecedented solar photovoltaic (PV) installation on the Calvin R. Rampton Salt Palace Convention Center. This 1.65 MW installation will be one the largest solar roof top installations in the country and will more than double the current installed solar capacity in the state of Utah. Construction is complete and the system will be operational in May 2012. The County has accomplished this project using a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) financing model. In a PPA model a third-party solar developer will finance, develop, own, operate, and maintain the solar array. Salt Lake County will lease its roof, and purchase the power from this third-party under a long-term Power Purchase Agreement contract. In fact, this will be one of the first projects in the state of Utah to take advantage of the recent (March 2010) legislation which makes PPA models possible for projects of this type. In addition to utilizing a PPA, this solar project will employ public and private capital, Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants (EECBG), and public/private subsidized bonds that are able to work together efficiently because of the recent stimulus bill. The project also makes use of recent changes to federal tax rules, and the recent re-awakening of private capital markets that make a significant public-private partnership possible. This is an extremely innovative project, and will mark the first time that all of these incentives (EECBG grants, Qualified Energy Conservation Bonds, New Markets tax credits, investment tax credits, public and private funds) have been packaged into one project. All of Salt Lake County's research documents and studies, agreements, and technical information is available to the public. In addition, the County has already shared a variety of information with the public through webinars, site tours, presentations, and written correspondence.

Barnett, Kimberly

2012-04-30T23:59:59.000Z

442

Clyde Thurman of Monroe County, Tennessee, and  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Clyde Thurman of Monroe County, Tennessee, and Clyde Thurman of Monroe County, Tennessee, and his 76 acres of switchgrass. Thurman was among the first farmers to grow switchgrass as part of the University of Tennessee Biofuels Initiative. (Photo: Ken Goddard, UT Extension) a BIOENERGY ecosystem ecosystem." "We are working with the biotech firm Ceres to develop more efficient feedstocks based on our science. Once regu- latory hurdles are satisfied, we can see a day where Ceres will in turn work with Genera, a University of Tennessee bioenergy spinoff company, to grow those feedstocks with the cooperation of a consortium of Tennessee

443

Software Helps Kentucky County Gauge Energy Use | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Software Helps Kentucky County Gauge Energy Use Software Helps Kentucky County Gauge Energy Use Software Helps Kentucky County Gauge Energy Use July 27, 2010 - 1:00pm Addthis How does it work? Software tracks energy usage, greenhouse gas levels and analyzes utility bills. County could see savings and cost recoveries of $100,000 to $200,000. Information allows county to make energy usage changes and identify retrofit needs. For county officials conscious of energy efficiency, deciphering complex utility bills and identifying both municipal energy-use trends and potential savings opportunities can be complex without sophisticated software. "We knew we needed a better system," says James Bush, energy manager for Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky. Last month, the county invested $140,000 of a $2.7 million Energy

444

Solar Projects Provide Energy to County Fairgrounds | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Projects Provide Energy to County Fairgrounds Projects Provide Energy to County Fairgrounds Solar Projects Provide Energy to County Fairgrounds September 23, 2010 - 1:01pm Addthis Solar panels have been installed at a shelter facility near Ulster County Fairgrounds. | Photo courtesy of Ulster County Solar panels have been installed at a shelter facility near Ulster County Fairgrounds. | Photo courtesy of Ulster County Kevin Craft What are the key facts? This project is expected to save local taxpayers $4,000 a year. All supplies and labor came from local, private contractors. Fairs, food festivals -- and solar panels. Every year, thousands of people attend events at the Ulster County Fairgrounds in New York State. This year visitors to the fairgrounds will get a first-hand look at two solar energy installations that are saving

445

Manager Helps Washington County Develop Energy Efficiency Projects |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Manager Helps Washington County Develop Energy Efficiency Projects Manager Helps Washington County Develop Energy Efficiency Projects Manager Helps Washington County Develop Energy Efficiency Projects August 11, 2010 - 1:01pm Addthis An Energy Department grant funded Autumn Salamack's new job as resource conservation manager for Kitsap County, Washington, and the energy efficient windows framed behind her. | Photo courtesy of Kitsap County, WA | An Energy Department grant funded Autumn Salamack's new job as resource conservation manager for Kitsap County, Washington, and the energy efficient windows framed behind her. | Photo courtesy of Kitsap County, WA | Maya Payne Smart Former Writer for Energy Empowers, EERE Autumn Salamack's career moved in a welcome new direction when she became the resource conservation manager for Kitsap County, Washington, in

446

Final Environmental Assessment, Burleigh County Wind Energy Center  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1542 August 2005 Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment Burleigh County Wind Energy Center Burleigh County, North Dakota Final Burleigh County Wind, LLC BASIN ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE Central Power Electric Cooperative, Inc. Introduction 1-1 Burleigh County Wind Energy Center Environmental Assessment CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION The Burleigh County Wind Energy Center is a wind generation project proposed by FPL Energy Burleigh County Wind, LLC (Burleigh County Wind). The proposed project would produce up to 50 megawatts (MW) of electricity, averaged annually. The proposed project is located in Burleigh County, North Dakota, approximately 3 miles south and 2 miles east of the town of Wilton, North Dakota (Figures 1-1

447

Aiken County Center for Hydrogen Research | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County Center for Hydrogen Research County Center for Hydrogen Research Jump to: navigation, search Name Aiken County Center for Hydrogen Research Place South Carolina Zip 29803 Sector Hydro, Hydrogen Product Aiken County Center for Hydrogen Reseach will launch its activities in 2005, involving with industrial and academic stakeholders. References Aiken County Center for Hydrogen Research[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Aiken County Center for Hydrogen Research is a company located in South Carolina . References ↑ "Aiken County Center for Hydrogen Research" Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Aiken_County_Center_for_Hydrogen_Research&oldid=341931"

448

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County's Green Idea  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

County's Green Idea House Achieves Efficient Goals to someone by E-mail County's Green Idea House Achieves Efficient Goals to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County's Green Idea House Achieves Efficient Goals on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County's Green Idea House Achieves Efficient Goals on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County's Green Idea House Achieves Efficient Goals on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County's Green Idea House Achieves Efficient Goals on Delicious Rank Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County's Green Idea House Achieves Efficient Goals on Digg Find More places to share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County's Green Idea House Achieves Efficient Goals on

449

Sac County Rural Electric Coop | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Sac County Rural Electric Coop Jump to: navigation, search Name Sac County Rural Electric Coop Place Iowa Utility Id 16529 Ownership C NERC Location MRO NERC MRO Yes Activity...

450

Newton County Rural E M C | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Newton County Rural E M C Jump to: navigation, search Name Newton County Rural E M C Place Indiana Utility Id 13566 Utility Location Yes Ownership C NERC Location RFC NERC RFC Yes...

451

Woodbury County Rural E C A | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Woodbury County Rural E C A Jump to: navigation, search Name Woodbury County Rural E C A Place Iowa Utility Id 20951 Utility Location Yes Ownership C NERC Location MRO NERC MRO Yes...

452

Jasper County Rural E M C | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Jasper County Rural E M C Jump to: navigation, search Name Jasper County Rural E M C Place Indiana Utility Id 9665 Utility Location Yes Ownership C NERC Location RFC NERC RFC Yes...

453

4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

4-County Electric Power Assn for March 2008. Monthly Electric Utility Sales and Revenue Data Short Name 2008-03 Utility Company 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) Place...

454

4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

4-County Electric Power Assn for December 2008. Monthly Electric Utility Sales and Revenue Data Short Name 2008-12 Utility Company 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) Place...

455

4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

4-County Electric Power Assn for October 2008. Monthly Electric Utility Sales and Revenue Data Short Name 2008-10 Utility Company 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) Place...

456

The Jury's In: Hillsborough County Courthouse Goes Solar | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

County. On Friday, the county formally flipped the switch of an extensive array of solar panels mounted on the rooftop of the Old Main Courthouse Building in downtown Tampa....

457

Park County, Wyoming: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Wyoming. Its FIPS County Code is 029. It is classified as ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Number 6 Climate Zone Subtype B. Registered Energy Companies in Park County, Wyoming Nacel...

458

Park County, Montana: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Montana. Its FIPS County Code is 067. It is classified as ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Number 6 Climate Zone Subtype B. Places in Park County, Montana Clyde Park, Montana Cooke...

459

EA-1136: Double Tracks Test Site, Nye County, Nevada | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6: Double Tracks Test Site, Nye County, Nevada EA-1136: Double Tracks Test Site, Nye County, Nevada SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposal for the U.S....

460

Solar Projects Provide Energy to County Fairgrounds | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Solar Projects Provide Energy to County Fairgrounds Solar Projects Provide Energy to County Fairgrounds September 23, 2010 - 1:01pm Addthis Solar panels have been installed at a...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "including clark county" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

California Energy Commission - Natural Gas Consumption by County  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County (2006-2009) Natural gas consumption data from the California Energy Commission sorted by County for Residential and Non-residential from 2006 to 2009. 2010-12-21T23:17:54Z...

462

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (ALAMEDA COUNTY BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AND ACBCTC (ALAMEDA COUNTY BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL, a corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "UNIVERSITY" or "MANAGEMENT"), and the Alameda County Building OPERATING ENGINEER LEADWORKER 8141 INSULATION WORKER 8142 MACHINIST LEADWORKER 8143 MACHINIST 8147

Walker, Matthew P.

463

Big Horn County Elec Coop, Inc (Wyoming) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Twitter icon Big Horn County Elec Coop, Inc (Wyoming) Jump to: navigation, search Name Big Horn County Elec Coop, Inc Place Wyoming Utility Id 1683 References EIA Form EIA-861...

464

EIS-0485: Interconnection of the Grande Prairie Wind Farm, Holt County, Nebraska  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

DOEs Western Area Power Administration is preparing this EIS to evaluate the environmental impacts of interconnecting the proposed Grande Prairie Wind Farm, in Holt County, near the city of ONeill, Nebraska, to Westerns power transmission system. The proposed wind energy generation project would include up to 266 wind turbines.

465

An update of the polymer-augmented alkaline flood at the Isenhour unit, Sublette County, Wyoming  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

An Almy sand polymer-augmented alkaline flood at the Isenhour Unit, Sublette County, WY, is reviewed. This paper updates process technology, including the use of clay stabilization, sweep improvement, soda ash alkaline agent (to reduce interfacial tension (IFT) and mobilize residual oil), and anionic-polymer-blend mobility buffer. Oil production has been increasing at 20%/yr since the process start.

Doll, T.E.

1988-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

466

Building America Best Practices Series: Guide to Determining Climate Regions by County  

SciTech Connect

This document describes the eight climate region designations used by the US Department of Energy Building America Program. In addition to describing the climate zones, the document includes a complete list of every county in the United States and their climate region designations. The county lists are grouped by state. The doucment is intended to assist builders to easily identify what climate region they are building in and therefore which climate-specific Building America best practices guide would be most appropriate for them.

Gilbride, Theresa L.

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

467

Environmental analysis of geopressured-geothermal prospect areas, Brazoria and Kenedy Counties, Texas  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Preliminary environmental data, including current land use, substrate lithology, soils, natural hazards, water resources, biological assemblages, meteorological data, and regulatory considerations have been collected and analyzed for approximately 150 km/sup 2/ of land: (1) near Chocolate Bayou, Brazoria County, Texas, where a geopressured-geothermal test well was drilled in 1978, and (2) near the rural community of Armstrong, Kenedy County, Texas, where future geopressured-geothermal test well development may occur. The study was designed to establish an environmental data base and to determine, within spatial constraints set by subsurface reservoir conditions, environmentally suitable sites for geopressured-geothermal wells.

White, W.A.; McGraw, M.; Gustavson, T.C.

1978-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

468

Photogeologic Interpretation of the Baltazor-McGee Geothermal Prospects, Humboldt County, Nevada  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

GeothermEx, Inc. was asked by Earth Power Corporation in October 1977 to perform a photogeologic study of the Baltazor and McGee geothermal prospects, northern Humboldt County, Nevada and southern Harney County, Oregon (figure 1), as a means of evaluating the geothermal reservoir and heat source at these prospects. Work began in October and was completed in December 1977. It included a brief field reconnaissance, to clarify particular points. This report summarizes findings and offers interpretations of structural features, stratigraphy, recent tectonic events, and subsurface conditions.

Gardner, Murray C.; Koenig, James B.

1978-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

469

Economic Impacts of Geothermal Development in Malheur County, Oregon.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This study provides local economic impact estimates for a 100 megawatt (MW) geothermal power project in Oregon. The hypothetical project would be in Malheur County, shown in Figure 1. Bonneville Power Administration commissioned this study to quantify such impacts as part of regional confirmation work recommended by the Northwest Power Planning Council and its advisors. Malheur County was chosen as it has both identified resources and industry interest. Local economic impacts include direct, indirect, and induced changes in the local economy. Direct economic impacts result from the costs of plant development, construction, and operation. Indirect impacts result from household and local government purchases. Induced impacts result from continued responding as goods and services to support the households and local governments are purchased. Employment impacts of geothermal development follow a pattern similar to the economic impacts. Public service impacts include costs such as education, fire protection, roads, waste disposal, and water supply. The project assumption discussion notes experiences at other geothermal areas. The background section compares geothermal with conventional power plants. Power plant fuel distinguishes geothermal from other power sources. Other aspects of development are similar to small scale conventional thermal sources. The process of geothermal development is then explained. Development consists of well drilling, gathering system construction, power plant construction, plant operation and maintenance, and wellfield maintenance.

Sifford, Alex; Beale, Kasi

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

470

Rebuilding it Better: Greensburg, Kansas, Kiowa County Memorial Hospital (Brochure) (Revised)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Kiowa County Memorial Hospital Kiowa County Memorial Hospital The original Kiowa County Hospital was destroyed in the tornado and rebuilt green. In fact, the hospital's design team took one of the most energy-intensive building types and designed a first-of-its kind energy-efficient hospital, while still meeting functional and safety requirements. The 50,000 square-foot building includes 15 acute-care beds, rural health and specialty clinics, an emergency department with two trauma rooms, physical/occu- pational therapy and radiology departments, a laboratory, and other support areas. The new hospital in Greensburg is projected to achieve more than 40% energy savings when compared to a hospital built to standard code thanks to features such as an on-site wind turbine. REBUILDING IT BETTER: GREENSBURG, KANSAS

471

Remote sensing survey of the Coso geothermal area, Inyo county, California.  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

sensing survey of the Coso geothermal area, Inyo county, California. sensing survey of the Coso geothermal area, Inyo county, California. Technical publication 1968--1971 Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Report: Remote sensing survey of the Coso geothermal area, Inyo county, California. Technical publication 1968--1971 Details Activities (4) Areas (1) Regions (0) Abstract: The Coso geothermal area, located primarily within the test ranges of the Naval Weapons Center, China Lake, Calif., is an area of granitic rock exposure and fracture-controlled explosion breccias and perlitic domes. Fumarolic and hot springs activity are present at scattered locations. Remote sensing studies were made that included color and color IR photography, 8- to 14-micrometer IR imagery, and snowmelt patterns. Color photography and snowmelt patterns were of greatest utility in

472

EA-1855: Creston-Bell Rebuild Project, Spokane and Lincoln Counties, WA |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

855: Creston-Bell Rebuild Project, Spokane and Lincoln 855: Creston-Bell Rebuild Project, Spokane and Lincoln Counties, WA EA-1855: Creston-Bell Rebuild Project, Spokane and Lincoln Counties, WA Summary This EA (also known as DOE/EA-4406 or DOE/BP-4406) evaluates the potential environmental impacts from rebuilding the Creston-Bell No. 1 115-kV transmission line, including the replacement of wood poles and associated structural components and conductor and access road improvements. The 54-mile long, wood pole line extends from the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Creston substation to the BPA Bell substation near Spokane in Lincoln and Spokane Counties, Washington. Additional information about this project is available on the BPA website. Public Comment Opportunities None available at this time. Documents Available for Download

473

EA-1938: Grieve Unit CO2 Enhanced Recovery Project, Natrona County, WY |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8: Grieve Unit CO2 Enhanced Recovery Project, Natrona County, 8: Grieve Unit CO2 Enhanced Recovery Project, Natrona County, WY EA-1938: Grieve Unit CO2 Enhanced Recovery Project, Natrona County, WY SUMMARY The Bureau of Land Management prepared, with DOE's Western Area Power Administration (Western) as a cooperating agency, an EA to analyze the potential environmental impacts of a proposal by Elk Petroleum Incorporated to implement enhanced recovery from the Cretaceous Muddy "Grieve Sand" in the Grieve Unit using a miscible carbon dioxide (CO2) flood with water injection to assist with reservoir repressurization. The proposed action includes drilling ten new wells; installing a CO2 pipeline, an aboveground 230 kV transmission line, an underground 25 kV power distribution line, and two electrical substations; replacing and enlarging an existing infield

474

EIS-0440: Quartzsite Solar Energy Project, La Paz County, AZ | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0: Quartzsite Solar Energy Project, La Paz County, AZ 0: Quartzsite Solar Energy Project, La Paz County, AZ EIS-0440: Quartzsite Solar Energy Project, La Paz County, AZ Summary This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts of interconnecting a proposed 100-megawatt concentrating solar power plant to Western's Bouse-Kofa 161-kilovolt transmission line. The proposal includes amending the Bureau of Land Management Resource Management Plan. Cooperating agencies in the preparation of this EIS are Bureau of Land Management (Yuma Field Office ), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Army Garrison (Yuma Proving Grounds), Arizona Game and Fish Department, and the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality. Further information is available for this Project on the Western Area Power Administration Website Public Comment Opportunities

475

EA-1938: Grieve Unit CO2 Enhanced Recovery Project, Natrona County, WY |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8: Grieve Unit CO2 Enhanced Recovery Project, Natrona County, 8: Grieve Unit CO2 Enhanced Recovery Project, Natrona County, WY EA-1938: Grieve Unit CO2 Enhanced Recovery Project, Natrona County, WY SUMMARY The Bureau of Land Management prepared, with DOE's Western Area Power Administration (Western) as a cooperating agency, an EA to analyze the potential environmental impacts of a proposal by Elk Petroleum Incorporated to implement enhanced recovery from the Cretaceous Muddy "Grieve Sand" in the Grieve Unit using a miscible carbon dioxide (CO2) flood with water injection to assist with reservoir repressurization. The proposed action includes drilling ten new wells; installing a CO2 pipeline, an aboveground 230 kV transmission line, an underground 25 kV power distribution line, and two electrical substations; replacing and enlarging an existing infield

476

RECIPIENT:Broward County u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Broward County Broward County u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERlVIINATION PROJECT TITLE : Sroward County SOLAR Project Page 1 of2 STATE: FL Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number elD Number DE-FOA-OOOO549 DE-EEOOO5701 GFO-OOO5701-OO1 0 Based on my review oftbe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 4S 1.1 A), I bave made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A 11 Technical adv ice and assistance to organizations Technical advice and planning assistance to international, national , slale, and local organizations. A9 Information gathering, analysis, and dissemination Information gathering (including, but not limited to, literature surveys, inventories, site visits, and audits), data analysis

477

EIS-0440: Quartzsite Solar Energy Project, La Paz County, AZ | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

40: Quartzsite Solar Energy Project, La Paz County, AZ 40: Quartzsite Solar Energy Project, La Paz County, AZ EIS-0440: Quartzsite Solar Energy Project, La Paz County, AZ Summary This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts of interconnecting a proposed 100-megawatt concentrating solar power plant to Western's Bouse-Kofa 161-kilovolt transmission line. The proposal includes amending the Bureau of Land Management Resource Management Plan. Cooperating agencies in the preparation of this EIS are Bureau of Land Management (Yuma Field Office ), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Army Garrison (Yuma Proving Grounds), Arizona Game and Fish Department, and the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality. Further information is available for this Project on the Western Area Power Administration Website Public Comment Opportunities

478

Economic Impacts of Wind Turbine Development in U.S. Counties  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

are the economic development impacts on U.S. counties of are the economic development impacts on U.S. counties of wind power projects, as defined by growth in per capita income and employment? Objective To address the research question using post-project construction, county-level data, and econometric evaluation methods. Background * Wind energy is expanding rapidly in the United States: Over the last 4 years, wind power has contributed approximately 35 percent of all new electric power capacity. * Wind power plants are often developed in rural areas where local economic development impacts from the installation are projected, including land lease and property tax payments and employment growth during plant construction and operation. * Wind energy represented 2.3 percent of the U.S. electricity supply in 2010, but studies show

479

Field guide to Muddy Formation outcrops, Crook County, Wyoming  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The objectives of this research program are to (1) determine the reservoir characteristics and production problems of shoreline barrier reservoirs; and (2) develop methods and methodologies to effectively characterize shoreline bamer reservoirs to predict flow patterns of injected and produced fluids. Two reservoirs were selected for detailed reservoir characterization studies -- Bell Creek field, Carter County, Montana that produces from the Lower Cretaceous (Albian-Cenomanian) Muddy Formation, and Patrick Draw field, Sweetwater County, Wyoming that produces from the Upper Cretaceous (Campanian) Almond Formation of the Mesaverde Group. An important component of the research project was to use information from outcrop exposures of the producing formations to study the spatial variations of reservoir properties and the degree to which outcrop information can be used in the construction of reservoir models. This report contains the data and analyses collected from outcrop exposures of the Muddy Formation, located in Crook County, Wyoming, 40 miles south of Bell Creek oil field. The outcrop data set contains permeability, porosity, petrographic, grain size and geologic data from 1-inch-diameter core plugs chilled from the outcrop face, as well as geological descriptions and sedimentological interpretations of the outcrop exposures. The outcrop data set provides information about facies characteristics and geometries and the spatial distribution of permeability and porosity on interwell scales. Appendices within this report include a micropaleontological analyses of selected outcrop samples, an annotated bibliography of papers on the Muddy Formation in the Powder River Basin, and over 950 permeability and porosity values measured from 1-inch-diameter core plugs drilled from the outcrop. All data contained in this resort are available in electronic format upon request. The core plugs drilled from the outcrop are available for measurement.

Rawn-Schatzinger, V.

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

480

Grant County Wind Farm | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Grant County Wind Farm Grant County Wind Farm Jump to: navigation, search Name Grant County Wind Farm Facility Grant County Wind Farm Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner Olympus Power Developer Suzlon and Juhl Wind Location 5 miles west of Hoffman and 6 miles south of Barrett MN Coordinates 45.82868°, -95.795288° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":45.82868,"lon":-95.795288,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "including clark county" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Day County Wind Project | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County Wind Project County Wind Project Jump to: navigation, search Name Day County Wind Project Facility Day County Wind Project Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner NextEra Energy Resources Developer NextEra Energy Resources Energy Purchaser Basin Electric Location East of Groton SD Coordinates 45.457157°, -97.754831° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":45.457157,"lon":-97.754831,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

482

Hancock County Wind Farm | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Hancock County Wind Farm Hancock County Wind Farm Facility Hancock County Wind Farm Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner NextEra Energy Resources Developer NextEra Energy Resources Energy Purchaser Alliant Energy (44 MW); rest purchased by Corn Belt Cooperative and Cedar Falls Location Hancock County IA Coordinates 43.066524°, -93.70481° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":43.066524,"lon":-93.70481,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

483

Wind Energy Guide for County Commissioners  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

One of the key stakeholders associated with economic development are local government officials, who are often required to evaluate and vote on commercial wind energy project permits, as well as to determine and articulate what wind energy benefits accrue to their counties. Often these local officials lack experience with large-scale wind energy and need to make important decisions concerning what may be a complicated and controversial issue. These decisions can be confounded with diverse perspectives from various stakeholders. This project is designed to provide county commissioners, planners, and other local county government officials with a practical overview of information required to successfully implement commercial wind energy projects in their county. The guidebook provides readers with information on the following 13 topics: Brief Wind Energy Overview; Environmental Benefits; Wind Energy Myths and Facts; Economic Development Benefits; Wind Economics; The Development Process; Public Outreach; Siting Issues; Property Tax Incentives; Power System Impacts; Permitting, Zoning, and Siting Processes; Case Studies; and Further Information. For each of the above topics, the guidebook provides an introduction that identifies the topic, why local government should care, a topic snapshot, how the topic will arise, and a list of resources that define and assess the topic.

Costanti, M.

2006-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

484

Economic Impacts of Wind Turbine Development in U.S. Counties  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The objective is to address the research question using post-project construction, county-level data, and econometric evaluation methods. Wind energy is expanding rapidly in the United States: Over the last 4 years, wind power has contributed approximately 35 percent of all new electric power capacity. Wind power plants are often developed in rural areas where local economic development impacts from the installation are projected, including land lease and property tax payments and employment growth during plant construction and operation. Wind energy represented 2.3 percent of the U.S. electricity supply in 2010, but studies show that penetrations of at least 20 percent are feasible. Several studies have used input-output models to predict direct, indirect, and induced economic development impacts. These analyses have often been completed prior to project construction. Available studies have not yet investigated the economic development impacts of wind development at the county level using post-construction econometric evaluation methods. Analysis of county-level impacts is limited. However, previous county-level analyses have estimated operation-period employment at 0.2 to 0.6 jobs per megawatt (MW) of power installed and earnings at $9,000/MW to $50,000/MW. We find statistically significant evidence of positive impacts of wind development on county-level per capita income from the OLS and spatial lag models when they are applied to the full set of wind and non-wind counties. The total impact on annual per capita income of wind turbine development (measured in MW per capita) in the spatial lag model was $21,604 per MW. This estimate is within the range of values estimated in the literature using input-output models. OLS results for the wind-only counties and matched samples are similar in magnitude, but are not statistically significant at the 10-percent level. We find a statistically significant impact of wind development on employment in the OLS analysis for wind counties only, but not in the other models. Our estimates of employment impacts are not precise enough to assess the validity of employment impacts from input-output models applied in advance of wind energy project construction. The analysis provides empirical evidence of positive income effects at the county level from cumulative wind turbine development, consistent with the range of impacts estimated using input-output models. Employment impacts are less clear.

J., Brown; B., Hoen; E., Lantz; J., Pender; R., Wiser

2011-07-25T23:59:59.000Z

485

Energy Efficient Buildings, Salt Lake County, Utah  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Salt Lake County is pleased to announce the completion of its unprecedented solar photovoltaic (PV) installation on the Calvin R. Rampton Salt Palace Convention Center. This 1.65 MW installation will be one the largest solar roof top installations in the country and will more than double the current installed solar capacity in the state of Utah. Construction is complete and the system will be operational in May 2012. The County has accomplished this project using a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) financing model. In a PPA model a third-party solar developer will finance, develop, own, operate, and maintain the solar array. Salt Lake County will lease its roof, and purchase the power from this third-party under a long-term Power Purchase Agreement contract. In fact, this will be one of the first projects in the state of Utah to take advantage of the recent (March 2010) legislation which makes PPA models possible for projects of this type. In addition to utilizing a PPA, this solar project will employ public and private capital, Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants (EECBG), and public/private subsidized bonds that are able to work together efficiently because of the recent stimulus bill. The project also makes use of recent changes to federal tax rules, and the recent re-awakening of private capital markets that make a significant public-private partnership possible. This is an extremely innovative project, and will mark the first time that all of these incentives (EECBG grants, Qualified Energy Conservation Bonds, New Markets tax credits, investment tax credits, public and private funds) have been packaged into one project. All of Salt Lake County's research documents and studies, agreements, and technical information is available to the public. In addition, the County has already shared a variety of information with the public through webinars, site tours, presentations, and written correspondence.

Barnett, Kimberly

2012-04-30T23:59:59.000Z

486

Fewer lights, Brighter Shine in New Hampshire County | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fewer lights, Brighter Shine in New Hampshire County Fewer lights, Brighter Shine in New Hampshire County Fewer lights, Brighter Shine in New Hampshire County September 20, 2010 - 3:00pm Addthis New sodium lamp lights at Strafford County’s courthouse parking lot are expected to save the county $6,000 on energy bills annually. | Photo courtesy of Strafford County New sodium lamp lights at Strafford County's courthouse parking lot are expected to save the county $6,000 on energy bills annually. | Photo courtesy of Strafford County New sodium lamp lights at Strafford County's courthouse parking lot are expected to save the county $6,000 on energy bills annually. | Photo courtesy of Strafford County | New sodium lamp lights at Strafford County's courthouse parking lot are expected to save the county $6,000 on energy bills annually. | Photo courtesy of Strafford County

487

Fewer lights, Brighter Shine in New Hampshire County | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fewer lights, Brighter Shine in New Hampshire County Fewer lights, Brighter Shine in New Hampshire County Fewer lights, Brighter Shine in New Hampshire County September 20, 2010 - 3:00pm Addthis New sodium lamp lights at Strafford County’s courthouse parking lot are expected to save the county $6,000 on energy bills annually. | Photo courtesy of Strafford County New sodium lamp lights at Strafford County's courthouse parking lot are expected to save the county $6,000 on energy bills annually. | Photo courtesy of Strafford County New sodium lamp lights at Strafford County's courthouse parking lot are expected to save the county $6,000 on energy bills annually. | Photo courtesy of Strafford County | New sodium lamp lights at Strafford County's courthouse parking lot are expected to save the county $6,000 on energy bills annually. | Photo courtesy of Strafford County

488

Rockingham County - Small Wind Ordinance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Rockingham County - Small Wind Ordinance Rockingham County - Small Wind Ordinance Rockingham County - Small Wind Ordinance < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Industrial Institutional Local Government Nonprofit Residential Schools Savings Category Wind Buying & Making Electricity Program Info State Virginia Program Type Solar/Wind Permitting Standards Provider Virginia Wind Energy Collaborative In October 2004, the Rockingham County Board of Supervisors approved a zoning ordinance for small wind energy systems, the first of its kind in Virginia. Students at James Madison University drafted the original ordinance with guidance from members of the Virginia Wind Energy Collaborative (VWEC) and assistance from members of Rockingham County's planning board. Although net metering is not required, the ordinance complements the

489

County of Los Angeles, California | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Los Angeles, California Los Angeles, California Jump to: navigation, search Name County of Los Angeles Place Los Angeles, CA Website http://www.countyoflosangeles. References County of Los Angeles, California[1] Information About Partnership with NREL Partnership with NREL Yes Partnership Type Test & Evaluation Partner Partnering Center within NREL Electricity Resources & Building Systems Integration LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! County of Los Angeles, California is a company located in Los Angeles, CA. References ↑ "County of Los Angeles, California" Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=County_of_Los_Angeles,_California&oldid=379305" Categories: Clean Energy Organizations Companies

490

Los Angeles County - Commercial PACE (California) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Los Angeles County - Commercial PACE (California) Los Angeles County - Commercial PACE (California) Los Angeles County - Commercial PACE (California) < Back Eligibility Commercial Savings Category Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Heating Cooling Other Construction Heat Pumps Appliances & Electronics Commercial Lighting Lighting Manufacturing Home Weatherization Windows, Doors, & Skylights Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Solar Buying & Making Electricity Water Heating Program Info State California Program Type PACE Financing Businesses in Los Angeles County may be eligible for the county's Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) program. PACE programs allow businesses to finance energy and water efficiency projects which are repaid through a special assessment on the business's property taxes. The property must be

491

Aspen and Pitkin County - Renewable Energy Mitigation Program | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Aspen and Pitkin County - Renewable Energy Mitigation Program Aspen and Pitkin County - Renewable Energy Mitigation Program Aspen and Pitkin County - Renewable Energy Mitigation Program < Back Eligibility Commercial Residential Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Other Solar Heating Buying & Making Electricity Water Heating Wind Program Info State Colorado Program Type Building Energy Code Provider Community Office for Resource Efficiency (CORE) The City of Aspen and Pitkin County have adopted the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC), with some amendments, as their official energy code effective March 9, 2010. The [http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/county/countycode/Building%20C...

492

Mason County PUD 3 - Commercial and Industrial Energy Rebates | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Commercial and Industrial Energy Rebates Commercial and Industrial Energy Rebates Mason County PUD 3 - Commercial and Industrial Energy Rebates < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Fed. Government Industrial Local Government Nonprofit State Government Savings Category Home Weatherization Commercial Weatherization Heating & Cooling Construction Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Other Appliances & Electronics Commercial Lighting Lighting Manufacturing Program Info State District of Columbia Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount Lighting Rebates: Up to 70% of project cost Prescriptive Rebates: Varies widely, contact Mason County PUD 3 Custom Rebates: Varies widely, contact Mason County PUD 3 Provider Mason County PUD 3 Mason County PUD 3 offers rebates to its non-residential customers for

493

Durham County - High-Performance Building Policy | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Durham County - High-Performance Building Policy Durham County - High-Performance Building Policy Durham County - High-Performance Building Policy < Back Eligibility Local Government Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Bioenergy Solar Lighting Windows, Doors, & Skylights Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Heating Buying & Making Electricity Water Water Heating Wind Program Info State North Carolina Program Type Energy Standards for Public Buildings Provider Durham City and County Durham County adopted a resolution in October 2008 that requires new non-school public buildings and facilities to meet high-performance standards. New construction of public buildings and facilities greater than

494

Arlington County - Green Building Incentive Program | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Arlington County - Green Building Incentive Program Arlington County - Green Building Incentive Program Arlington County - Green Building Incentive Program < Back Eligibility Commercial Construction Installer/Contractor Multi-Family Residential Residential Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Bioenergy Solar Lighting Windows, Doors, & Skylights Heating Buying & Making Electricity Water Water Heating Wind Program Info State Virginia Program Type Green Building Incentive Provider Arlington County In October 1999, the County Board of Arlington adopted a Pilot Green Building Incentive Program using the standards established by the U. S. Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design

495

Improved Oil Recovery from Upper Jurassic Smackover Carbonates through the Application of Advanced Technologies at Womack Hill Oil Field, Choctaw and Clarke Counties, Eastern Gulf Coastal Plain, Class II  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The principal objectives of the project were: increasing the productivity and profitability of the Womack Hill Field Unit, thereby extending the economic life of this Class II Reservoir and transferring effectively and in a timely manner the knowledge gained and technology developed from this project to producers who are operating other domestic fields with Class II Reservoirs.

Mancini, Ernest, A.; Crate, David; Blasingame, Thomas; Major, R.P.; Brown, Lewis; Stafford, Wayne

2002-11-02T23:59:59.000Z

496

Geothermal resource area 3: Elko County. Area development plan  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Geothermal Resource Area 3 includes all of the land in Elko County, Nevada. There are in excess of 50 known thermal anomalies in this area. Several of the more major resources have been selected for detailed description and evaluation in this Area Development Plan. The other resources are considered too small, too low in temperature, or too remote to be considered for development in the near future. Various potential uses of the energy found at each of the studied resource sites in Elko County were determined after evaluating the area's physical characteristics; the land ownership and land use patterns; existing population and projected growth rates; transportation facilities and energy requirements. These factors were then compared with resource site specific data to determine the most likely uses of the resource. The uses considered in this evaluation were divided into five main categories: electrical generation, space heating, recreation, industrial process heat, and agriculture. Within two of these categories several subdivisions were considered separately. It was determined that several of the geothermal resources evaluated in the Area Development Plan could be commercially developed. The potential for development for the seven sites considered in this study is summarized.

Pugsley, M.

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

497

Economic Impacts of Geothermal Development in Deschutes County, Oregon.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This study provides local economic impact estimates for a 100 megawatt (MW) geothermal power project in Oregon. The hypothetical project would be Deschutes County. Bonneville Power Administration commissioned this study to quantify such impacts as part of regional confirmation work recommended by the Northwest Power Planning Council and its advisors. Deschutes County was chosen as it has both identified resources and industry interest. Geothermal energy is defined as the heat of the earth. For purposes of this study, geothermal energy is heat capable of economically generating electricity (using available technology). That translates to steam or hot water over 300{degrees}F. Local economical impacts include direct, indirect, and induced changes in the local economy. Direct economic impacts result for the costs of plant development, construction, and operation. Indirect impacts result from household and local government purchases. Induced impacts result from continued respending as goods and services to support the households and local governments are purchased. Employment impacts of geothermal development follow a pattern similar to the economic impacts. The workers associated with plant development bring their families to the area. Additional labor is required to provide support services for the new population. Local government services must also increase to support the new community growth and the geothermal plant itself. These changes yield indirect and induced employment impacts associated with the geothermal plant.

Sifford, Alex; Beale, Kasi

1991-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

498

Wheeler County Riparian Buffers; 2004-2005 Annual Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Number of Contacts Made--Over 44 landowner contacts were made regarding CREP potential. Out of those 44 contacts, 15 resulted in on-site visits to the property to discuss available options. Articles were published in the Wheeler SWCD annual report and newsletter totaling a distribution of 1,200. Two informational displays were viewed by approximately 500 people: one at the Wheeler SWCD Annual Meeting and the second at the Wheeler County Fair. Number of Contracts Negotiated and Signed--3 CREP contracts in Wheeler County were signed within this contract period. They included landowners on Stephenson Creek, Bear Creek and Lost Valley Creek. The project done on Lost Valley Creek was handled by the Gilliam Co. Riparian Buffer Specialist filling in during the Wheeler position being vacated. Work was also started and is proceeding on another four contracts. Problems Encountered During Contract Year: (1) Riparian Buffer position vacated in October 2004 and District had difficulty filling the position. This set the district back in some of the delineated goals. Existing district staff is now up-to-speed on training, etc. and District is confident of achieving outlined goals. (2) Issues involving qualification of irrigated rates and how to process irrigated acres through CREP. (3) Issues involving clarification of eligibility as it relates to financial status of landowner; and (4) Landowner comfort in signing up for federal programs.

Greer, Sue (Wheeler County Soil and Water Conservation District, John Day, OR)

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

499

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County, California  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Los Angeles Los Angeles County, California to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County, California on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County, California on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County, California on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County, California on Delicious Rank Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County, California on Digg Find More places to share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County, California on AddThis.com... Better Buildings Residential Network Progress Stories Interviews Videos Events Quick Links to Partner Information AL | AZ | CA | CO | CT FL | GA | IL | IN | LA ME | MD | MA | MI | MO

500

Riverside County - Sustainable Building Policy | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

County - Sustainable Building Policy County - Sustainable Building Policy Riverside County - Sustainable Building Policy < Back Eligibility Local Government Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Program Info State California Program Type Energy Standards for Public Buildings Provider County of Riverside In February 2009, the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors adopted Policy Number H-29, creating the Sustainable Building Policy. The Policy requires that all new county building projects initiated on or after March 1, 2009 must meet the criteria for LEED certification.The Board of Supervisors may grant exceptions, especially for projects under 5,000 square feet. Additionally, all county buildings project must have a LEED