National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for in-duct scrubber cxs

  1. EPA may force scrubbers on industry boilers

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hume, M.

    1985-05-13

    An Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposal requiring scrubber standards for industrial energy users will force industry to invest in the costly pollution control equipment used mostly by utilities today. The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for sulfur dioxide emissions will require either scrubbing or fluidized-bed combustion regardless of the fuel's sulfur content. Protests from the Council of Industrial Boiler Owners that this is an unfair burden on non-utility boilers note that scrubbing is more costly for smaller boilers, and that it could impede air quality improvement by discouraging the replacement of old boilers. EPA contests these claims.

  2. A ``NEW'' APPROACH TO ACTIVE NOISE CONTROL IN DUCTS 1

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Massachusetts at Amherst, University of

    A ``NEW'' APPROACH TO ACTIVE NOISE CONTROL IN DUCTS 1 Prashant Mehta 2 , Yuan Zheng 3 , Yossi Chait consider the fixed­filter design ap­ proach for active noise control (ANC) in ducts. Based on a large body.e., a duct equipped with both feedforward and feedback sensors and a control speaker. Our design of a linear

  3. Supporting Calculations For Submerged Bed Scrubber Condensate Disposal Preconceptual Study

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Pajunen, A. J.; Tedeschi, A. R.

    2012-09-18

    This document provides supporting calculations for the preparation of the Submerged Bed Scrubber Condensate Disposal Preconceptual Study report The supporting calculations include equipment sizing, Hazard Category determination, and LAW Melter Decontamination Factor Adjustments.

  4. Viscous Flow in Ducts We want to study the viscous flow in ducts with various velocities, fluids and duct shapes. The basic

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Bahrami, Majid

    Viscous Flow in Ducts We want to study the viscous flow in ducts with various velocities, fluids and duct shapes. The basic problem is this: Given the pipe geometry and its added components (e Fluid Mechanics (S 09) Viscous Flow in Ducts 2 103

  5. Separation of Mercury from Flue Gas Desulfurization Scrubber Produced Gypsum

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hensman, Carl, E., P.h.D; Baker, Trevor

    2008-06-16

    Frontier Geosciences (Frontier; FGS) proposed for DOE Grant No. DE-FG02-07ER84669 that mercury control could be achieved in a wet scrubber by the addition of an amendment to the wet-FGD scrubber. To demonstrate this, a bench-scale scrubber and synthetic flue-gas supply was designed to simulate the limestone fed, wet-desulfurization units utilized by coal-fired power plants. Frontier maintains that the mercury released from these utilities can be controlled and reduced by modifying the existing equipment at installations where wet flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) systems are employed. A key element of the proposal was FGS-PWN, a liquid-based mercury chelating agent, which can be employed as the amendment for removal of all mercury species which enter the wet-FGD scrubber. However, the equipment design presented in the proposal was inadequate to demonstrate these functions and no significant progress was made to substantiate these claims. As a result, funding for a Phase II continuation of this work will not be pursued. The key to implementing the technology as described in the proposal and report appears to be a high liquid-to-gas ratio (L/G) between the flue-gas and the scrubber liquor, a requirement not currently implemented in existing wet-FGD designs. It may be that this constraint can be reduced through parametric studies, but that was not apparent in this work. Unfortunately, the bench-scale system constructed for this project did not function as intended and the funds and time requested were exhausted before the separation studies could occur.

  6. Numerical Study of Acoustic Modes in Ducted Shear Flow

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Rienstra, Sjoerd W.

    Numerical Study of Acoustic Modes in Ducted Shear Flow Gregory G. Vilenski & Sjoerd W. Rienstra mean flow inside a duct is studied numerically. For isentropic flow in a circular duct with zero swirl 26, 2007 #12;1 Introduction Normal mode analysis of small-amplitude disturbances in an annular duct

  7. Dry scrubber reduces SO sub 2 in calciner flue gas

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Brown, G.W. (Refining Consulting Services, Englewood, CO (US)); Roderick, D. (Western Slope Refining Co., Fruita, CO (US)); Nastri, A. (NATEC Resources Inc., Dallas, TX (US))

    1991-02-18

    This paper discusses the installation of a dry sulfur dioxide scrubber for an existing petroleum coke calciner at its Fruita, Colo., refinery. The dry scrubbing process was developed by the power industry to help cope with the acid rain problem. It is the first application of the process in an oil refinery. The process could also remove SO{sub 2} from the flue gas of a fluid catalytic cracker, fluid coker, or other refinery sources.

  8. Mercury removal in utility wet scrubber using a chelating agent

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Amrhein, Gerald T. (Louisville, OH)

    2001-01-01

    A method for capturing and reducing the mercury content of an industrial flue gas such as that produced in the combustion of a fossil fuel or solid waste adds a chelating agent, such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or other similar compounds like HEDTA, DTPA and/or NTA, to the flue gas being scrubbed in a wet scrubber used in the industrial process. The chelating agent prevents the reduction of oxidized mercury to elemental mercury, thereby increasing the mercury removal efficiency of the wet scrubber. Exemplary tests on inlet and outlet mercury concentration in an industrial flue gas were performed without and with EDTA addition. Without EDTA, mercury removal totaled 42%. With EDTA, mercury removal increased to 71%. The invention may be readily adapted to known wet scrubber systems and it specifically provides for the removal of unwanted mercury both by supplying S.sup.2- ions to convert Hg.sup.2+ ions into mercuric sulfide (HgS) and by supplying a chelating agent to sequester other ions, including but not limited to Fe.sup.2+ ions, which could otherwise induce the unwanted reduction of Hg.sup.2+ to the form, Hg.sup.0.

  9. Limited demand seen for scrubber-derived fertilizers

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1985-12-01

    By-product marketability of scrubber-derived materials to the fertilizer industry will likely make only a small contribution to the acid rain problem. Those who claim the ammonia-based flue-gas materials will have an economic market cite the Bhara process undergoing testing at Indianapolis Power and Light for the removal of nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide, but fertilizer spokesmen feel the market will be limited to certain areas in the Midwest and the Pacific Northwest. This would reduce economic benefits. The Ebara material is easier to handle than ammonia, and should have a competitive price.

  10. Duct spinning mode's particle velocity imaging with in-duct circular microphone array

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Huang, Xun

    Duct spinning mode's particle velocity imaging with in-duct circular microphone array Qingkai Wei's Republic of China Nowadays, the measurements within a duct have to be conducted using in-duct microphone. In this work, an imaging method of acoustic spinning modes propagating within a circular duct simply

  11. Retrofitting existing chemical scrubbers to biotrickling filters for H2S emission control

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Retrofitting existing chemical scrubbers to biotrickling filters for H2S emission control David owned treatment works in the United States (1, 2) and probably 50,000 worldwide, and emission

  12. Cross-flow versus counter-current flow packed-bed scrubbers: a mathematical analysis

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Fthenakis, V.M.

    1996-02-01

    Little is known about the mass transfer properties of packing media exposed to a crossflow of gas and liquid, whereas there is abundant information related to counter-current scrubbers. This paper presents a theoretical analysis of mass transfer and hydrodynamics in cross- flow packed bed scrubbers and compares those with information available for counter current towers, so that the first can be evaluated and/or designed based on data derived for the second. Mathematical models of mass transfer in cross-flow and counter- current packed bed scrubbers are presented. From those, one can predict the removal effectiveness of a crossflow scrubber from the number of transfer units (NTU) calculated for a similar counterflow operation; alternatively, when the removal effectiveness in counterflow is known, one can predict the corresponding NTU in crossflow.

  13. Value-Added Products From FGD Sulfite-Rich Scrubber Materials

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Vivak M. Malhotra

    2006-09-30

    Massive quantities of sulfite-rich flue gas desulfurization (FGD) scrubber materials are produced every year in the USA. In fact, at present, the production of wet sulfite-rich scrubber cake outstrips the production of wet sulfate-rich scrubber cake by about 6 million tons per year. However, most of the utilization focus has centered on FGD gypsum. Therefore, we have recently initiated research on developing new strategies for the economical, but environmentally-sound, utilization of sulfite-rich scrubber material. In this exploratory project (Phase I), we attempted to ascertain whether it is feasible to develop reconstituted wood replacement products from sulfite-rich scrubber material. In pursuit of this goal, we characterized two different wet sulfite-rich scrubber materials, obtained from two power plants burning Midwestern coal, for their suitability for the development of value-added products. The overall strategy adopted was to fabricate composites where the largest ingredient was scrubber material with additional crop materials as additives. Our results suggested that it may be feasible to develop composites with flexural strength as high as 40 MPa (5800 psi) without the addition of external polymers. We also attempted to develop load-bearing composites from scrubber material, natural fibers, and phenolic polymer. The polymer-to-solid ratio was limited to {le} 0.4. The formulated composites showed flexural strengths as high as 73 MPa (10,585 psi). We plan to harness the research outcomes from Phase I to develop parameters required to upscale our value-added products in Phase II.

  14. A theoretical analysis of acoustic scrubber in diesel engine emission control 

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Huang, Tiing-Lieh

    1985-01-01

    A THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF ACOUSTIC SCRUBBER IN DIESEL ENGINE EMISSION CONTROL A Thesis by Tiing-Lich Huang Submitted to the Graduate College of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER... OF SCIENCE May 1985 Major Subject: Mechanical Engineering A THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF ACOUSTIC SCRUBBER IN DIESEL ENGINE EMISSION CONTROL A Thesis by Tiing-Lich Huang Approved as to style and content by: Josep K. ou (Chairman of Committee) Marro Co...

  15. Value-Added Products from FGD Sulfite-Rich Scrubber Materials

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Vivak Malhotra

    2010-01-31

    According to the American Coal Ash Association, about 29.25 million tons of flue gas desulfurization (FGD) byproducts were produced in the USA in 2003. Out of 29.25 million tons, 17.35 million tons were sulfite-rich scrubber materials. At present, unlike its cousin FGD gypsum, the prospect for effective utilization of sulfite-rich scrubber materials is not bright. In fact, almost 16.9 million tons are leftover every year. In our pursuit to mitigate the liability of sulfite-rich FGD scrubber materials' disposal, we are attempting to develop value-added products that can commercially compete. More specifically, for this Innovative Concept Phase I project, we have the following objectives: to characterize the sulfite-rich scrubber material for toxic metals; to optimize the co-blending and processing of scrubber material and natural byproducts; to formulate and develop structural composites from sulfite-rich scrubber material; and to evaluate the composites' mechanical properties and compare them with current products on the market. After successfully demonstrating the viability of our research, a more comprehensive approach will be proposed to take these value-added materials to fruition.

  16. Task 2.8 -- Mercury speciation and capture in scrubber solutions. Semi-annual report, July 1--December 31, 1996

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Ness, S.R.

    1997-08-01

    Investigations into mercury control across conventional scrubber systems have precipitated questions concerning (1) the initial speciation between oxidized and elemental forms of mercury in flue gas from coal-fired boilers and, subsequently, (2) the effects of scrubber slurry composition and pH on the mercury forms. Mercury capture in scrubber slurry is highly dependent on its form. Oxidized mercury is highly water-soluble and can be removed by scrubber slurry, whereas elemental mercury is not and passes through the scrubber to the stack. The objectives of this project are to determine whether scrubber solutions convert either form of mercury to another and whether mercury capture is affected by pH.

  17. Task 2.8 - Mercury speciation and capture in scrubber solutions: Semiannual report, January 1-June 30, 1996

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Ness, S.R.

    1997-09-01

    Investigations into mercury control across conventional scrubber systems have precipitated questions concerning (1) the initial speciation between oxidized and elemental forms of mercury in flue gas from coal-fired boilers and subsequently, (2) the effects of scrubber slurry composition and pH on the mercury forms. Mercury capture in scrubber slurry is highly dependent on its own form. Oxidized mercury is highly water-soluble and can be removed by scrubber slurry, whereas elemental mercury is not and passes through the scrubber to the stack. The objectives of this project are to determine whether scrubber solutions convert either form of mercury to another and whether mercury capture is affected by pH.

  18. Contributions to the theory of soundpropagation in ducts with bulk-reacting lining

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Rienstra, Sjoerd W.

    Contributions to the theory of soundpropagation in ducts with bulk-reacting lining S.W. Rienstra interfaceduct/liner modalamplitudeductfield outer radius duct with liner modalamplitudelinerfield wavenumber duct radial wavenumber liner axial wavenumber smallparameter ratioradialpressuregradientsat

  19. EPA reports advances in scrubber technology at Flue Gas Desulfurization symposium

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Smock, R.

    1982-07-01

    The overall message of the recent Symposium on Flue Gas Desulfurization was that the technology for sulfur dioxide scrubbing has matured enough for discussions to focus on future improvements rather than whether scrubbers work at all. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations will not change in the near future, however, unless there are changes in the Clean air Act to deal with acid rain, despite the improvements in performance data. The symposium covered reports on dual-alkali scrubbing, organic buffer additives, the probability that scrubber wastes will not be classified as hazardous, simultaneous removal of nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide, and continuous monitoring programs. 3 figures, 4 tables. (DCK)

  20. Radiological engineering evaluation of the delay line air scrubber located at the Clinton P. Anderson Meson Physics Facility (LAMPF) 

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Huneycutt, Scott Edward

    1996-01-01

    the scrubbing efficiency of the scrubber. The scrubbing efficiency was then used to predict the dose rates in the scrubber area and compare those values with measurements from radiological surveys. The third objective was to determine if the shield blocks were...

  1. USDOE Innovative Clean Coal Technology Demonstration Project: Passamaquoddy Technology Recovery Scrubber{trademark}. Final report: Volume 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-02-01

    This Final Report provides available design, operational, and maintenance information, and marketing plans, on the Passamaquoddy Technology Recovery Scrubber{trademark} demonstration Project at the Dragon Products company`s cement plant at Thomaston, Maine. In addition, data on pollutant removal efficiencies and system economics are reviewed. The Recovery Scrubber was developed to simultaneously address the emission of acid gas pollutants and the disposal of alkaline solid waste at a cement plant. The process, however, has general application to other combustion processes including waste or fossil fuel fired boilers. Selected chemistry of the exhaust gas, (before and after treatment by the Recovery Scrubber), selected chemistry of the cement plant kiln baghouse dust catch (before and after treatment by the Recovery Scrubber), and Dragon cement plant economics are presented. current marketing efforts and potential markets for the Recovery Scrubber in several industries are discussed.

  2. EXACT RIEMANN SOLUTIONS TO COMPRESSIBLE EULER EQUATIONS IN DUCTS WITH DISCONTINUOUS CROSSSECTION

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    EXACT RIEMANN SOLUTIONS TO COMPRESSIBLE EULER EQUATIONS IN DUCTS WITH DISCONTINUOUS CROSS solutions for the system of Euler equa- tions in a duct with discontinuous varying cross through a duct of variable cross­section with the area a(x). They are given in the perturbation form U

  3. Modelling air pollution abatement in deep street canyons by means of air scrubbers

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    De Giovanni, Marina; Avveduto, Alessandro; Pace, Lorenzo; Salisburgo, Cesare Dari; Giammaria, Franco; Monaco, Alessio; Spanto, Giuseppe; Tripodi, Paolo

    2015-01-01

    Deep street canyons are characterized by weak ventilation and recirculation of air. In such environment, the exposure to particulate matter and other air pollutants is enhanced, with a consequent worsening of both safety and health. The main solution adopted by the international community is aimed at the reduction of the emissions. In this theoretical study, we test a new solution: the removal of air pollutants close to their sources by a network of Air Pollution Abatement (APA) devices. The APA technology depletes gaseous and particulate air pollutants by a portable and low-consuming scrubbing system, that mimics the processes of wet and dry deposition. We estimate the potential pollutant abatement efficacy of a single absorber by Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) method. The presence of the scrubber effectively creates an additional sink at the bottom of the canyon, accelerating its cleaning process by up to 70%, when an almost perfect scrubber (90% efficiency) is simulated. The efficacy of absorber is not...

  4. Venturi/vortex scrubber technology for controlling/recycling chromium electroplating emissions. Final report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hay, K.J.; Qi, S.; Holden, B.; Helgeson, N.; Fraser, M.E.

    1999-03-01

    Chromium electroplating is an essential DOD process. Chromium has a combination of qualities that are very difficult to substitute, however, the process itself is inefficient, resulting in the production of byproduct gases that rise and create a mist of chromic acid (strongly regulated as an air pollutant) above the plating tank. Venturi/Vortex Scrubber Technology (VVST) was designed to control chromium electroplating emissions by collecting the gas bubbles before they burst at the solution`s surface. This project demonstrated the Venturi/Vortex Scrubber Technology at the Marine Corps Logistics Base (MCLB) in Albany, GA. This study concluded that the PLRS was able to reduce the flow rate of the current conventional ventilation system at the one tank chromium electroplating facility at MCLB Albany by 63 percent. If new ventilation and control equipment were to be installed at MCLB Albany, this system would offer a 25 percent reduction in capital costs and a 48 percent reduction in annual costs, representing 36 percent in life-cycle cost savings. This study also presented a strong case for the use of Spark-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy for monitoring real-time chromium emissions above a chromium electroplating tank.

  5. Conversion of Full-Scale Wet Scrubbers to Biotrickling Filters for H2S Control at Publicly Owned Treatment Works

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    ; Conversion; Biological treatment; Air pollution. Introduction Many of the 16,700 publicly owned treatment contact time than chemical scrubbing, hence bioreactors for air treatment required a larger footprint-scale chemical scrubbers treating odorous air at the Sanitation District of Orange County, Calif., were converted

  6. High-solids paint overspray aerosols in a spray painting booth: particle size analysis and scrubber efficiency

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Chan, T.L.; D'arcy, J.B.; Schreck, R.M.

    1986-07-01

    Particle size distributions of high-solids acrylic-enamel paint overspray aerosols were determined isokinetically in a typical downdraft spray painting booth in which a 7-stage cascade impactor was used. Three different industrial paint atomizers were used, and the paint aerosols were characterized before and after a paint both scrubber. The mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of a metallic basecoat and an acrylic clearcoat paint aerosol from air-atomized spray guns ranged from 4-12 ..mu..m and was dependent on atomization pressure. When the paint booth was operated under controlled conditions simulating those in a plant, the collection efficiency of paint overspray aerosols by a paint scrubber was found to be size dependent and decreased sharply for particles smaller than 2 ..mu..m to as low as 64% for clearcoat paint particles of 0.6 ..mu..m. Improvement in the overall particulate removal efficiency can be achieved by optimizing the spray painting operations so as to produce the least amount of fine overspray paint aerosols less than 2 ..mu..m. Maintaining a higher static pressure drop across the paint both scrubber also will improve scrubber performance.

  7. Development of venturi/vortex scrubber technology for controlling chromium electroplating hazardous air emissions. Final report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hay, K.J.; Qi, S.; Northrup, J.I.; Heck, S.R.

    1998-07-01

    Chromium has a combination of qualities that give chromium electroplating an important role in coating military hardware and armament. However, chromium electroplating and chromium anodizing operations create hazardous air pollutants in the form of hexavalent chromium. Conventional technologies for controlling this pollutant are expensive, noisy, and use a lot of energy and water. Consequently, an air pollution problem is turned into a water pollution problem that also requires treatment. There is a need for an economical control option that pollutes less than conventional technologies. This project developed control technologies to effectively and economically control hazardous air emissions from Army chromium electroplating and anodizing operations, primarily focusing on the development of the Venturi/Vortex Scrubber technology (VVST).

  8. Novel Adsorbent-Reactants for Treatment of Ash and Scrubber Pond Effluents

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Bill Batchelor; Dong Suk Han; Eun Jung Kim

    2010-01-31

    The overall goal of this project was to evaluate the ability of novel adsorbent/reactants to remove specific toxic target chemicals from ash and scrubber pond effluents while producing stable residuals for ultimate disposal. The target chemicals studied were arsenic (As(III) and As(V)), mercury (Hg(II)) and selenium (Se(IV) and Se(VI)). The adsorbent/reactants that were evaluated are iron sulfide (FeS) and pyrite (FeS{sub 2}). Procedures for measuring concentrations of target compounds and characterizing the surfaces of adsorbent-reactants were developed. Effects of contact time, pH (7, 8, 9, 10) and sulfate concentration (0, 1, 10 mM) on removal of all target compounds on both adsorbent-reactants were determined. Stability tests were conducted to evaluate the extent to which target compounds were released from the adsorbent-reactants when pH changed. Surface characterization was conducted with x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to identify reactions occurring on the surface between the target compounds and surface iron and sulfur. Results indicated that target compounds could be removed by FeS{sub 2} and FeS and that removal was affected by time, pH and surface reactions. Stability of residuals was generally good and appeared to be affected by the extent of surface reactions. Synthesized pyrite and mackinawite appear to have the required characteristics for removing the target compounds from wastewaters from ash ponds and scrubber ponds and producing stable residuals.

  9. Acoustic imaging of a duct spinning mode by the use of an in-duct circular microphone array

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Huang, Xun

    Acoustic imaging of a duct spinning mode by the use of an in-duct circular microphone array Qingkai 2013) An imaging method of acoustic spinning modes propagating within a circular duct simply in a theoretical way and is demonstrated by a numerical simulation case. Nowadays, the measurements within a duct

  10. Recent VOC Control Test Data for a Reactive VOC Converter- Scrubber System for Non-Thermal Control of VOCs 

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    McGinness, M.

    2003-01-01

    plug and blind off the media or kill the microorganisms if the emissions carry metals or organics that act as biocides at elevated concentrations (Webster, 1999). Bio-trickling filters and stationary air biofilters use fixed microorganisms... but the bio-trickling filters use a flowing water phase. Bio-scrubbers use a suspended biomass and a flowing water phase. Biofilters do not produce CO, NOx, and only produce small amounts of C02. Incineration They typically oxidize VOHAPs to C02...

  11. EVALUATION OF AEROSOL EMISSIONS DOWNSTREAM OF AN AMMONIA-BASED SO2 SCRUBBER

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Dennis L. Laudal

    2002-04-01

    Depending on the size and type of boiler, the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments required specific reductions in SO{sub 2} emissions from coal-fired electric utilities. To meet these requirements, SO{sub 2} reduction strategies have included installing scrubbing technology, switching to a more expensive low-sulfur coal, or purchasing SO{sub 2} allowances. It is expected that over the next 10 years there will be an increase in the price of low-sulfur coals, but that higher-sulfur coal costs will remain the same. Technologies must be strongly considered that allow the use of high-sulfur fuels while at the same time meeting current and future SO{sub 2} emission limits. One such technology is the ammonia based flue gas desulfurization (FGD) (NH{sub 3}-based FGD) system manufactured by Marsulex Environmental Technologies (MET). The MET scrubber is a patented NH{sub 3}-based FGD process that efficiently converts SO{sub 2} (>95%) into a fertilizer product, ammonium sulfate ([NH{sub 4}]{sub 2}SO{sub 4}). A point of concern for the MET technology, as well as other FGD systems, is the emission of sulfuric acid/SO{sub 3} aerosols that could result in increased opacity at the stack. This is a direct result of firing high-sulfur fuels that naturally generate more SO{sub 3} than do low-sulfur coals. SO{sub 3} is formed during the coal combustion process. SO{sub 3} is converted to gaseous H{sub 2}SO{sub 4} by homogeneous condensation, leading to a submicron acid fume that is very difficult to capture in a dry electrostatic precipitator (ESP). The condensed acid can also combine with the fly ash in the duct and scale the duct wall, potentially resulting in corrosion of both metallic and nonmetallic surfaces. Therefore, SO{sub 3} in flue gas can have a significant impact on the performance of coal-fired utility boilers, air heaters, and ESPs. In addition to corrosion problems, excess SO{sub 3} emissions can result in plume opacity problems. Thus the Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC) was contracted by MET and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to evaluate the potential of a wet ESP for reducing SO{sub 3} emissions. The work consisted of pilot-scale tests using the EERC's slagging furnace system (SFS) to determine the effectiveness of a wet ESP to control SO{sub 3}/H{sub 2}SO{sub 4} aerosol emissions in conjunction with a dry ESP and MET's NH{sub 3}-based FGD. Because these compounds are in the form of fine particles, it is speculated that a relatively small, highly efficient wet ESP following the MET scrubber would remove these fine aerosol particles. The performance target for the wet ESP was a particulate mass collection efficiency of >90%; this level of performance would likely ensure a stack opacity of <10%.

  12. Technical letter report: Submerged bed scrubber sediment resuspension testing for the Hanford Waste Vitrification Plant

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Schmidt, A.J.; Herrington, M.G.

    1996-03-01

    During-vitrification operations in the Hanford Waste Vitrification Plant (HWVP), some feed components will be vented from the melter to the melter offgas cleaning equipment. The current HWVP reference process for melter off.-gas treatment includes a submerged bed scrubber (SBS) to provide the first stage of off-gas scrubbing and quenching. During most melter/off-gas test runs at Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) with the Pilot Scale Ceramic Melter (PSCM) and at the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP), no significant quantities of sedimentation were accumulated in the SBS scrub tank. However, during test run SF-12, conducted at West Valley, approximately 6 in. of sedimentation accumulated in the scrub tank. This raised concerns that a similar accumulation could occur with the HWVP SBS, If such an accumulation rate occurred during a sustained melter run, the SBS would soon cease to function. To alleviate the potential for sedimentation buildup, the HWVP SBS design includes a sparge ring at the bottom of the scrub tank. The sparge ring will be operated intermittently to prevent buildup of solids which could interfere with circulation with the SBS Scrub tank. This report presents the results of testing conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the HWVP sparge ring design. Section 2 contains-the conclusions and recommendations; Section 3 summarizes the objectives; Section 4 describes the equipment and materials used; Section 5 gives the experimental approach; and Section 6 discusses the results. The appendices contain procedures for sediment resuspension testing and particle size distribution data for silica and sediment.

  13. Scrubber strategy: the how and why of flue gas desulfurization. [Analysis of 20 US scrubbing systems in 1980

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Baviello, M.A.

    1982-01-01

    In this report, INFORM provides facts that will help the non-technical decisionmakers in the US understand a technology that can significantly reduce the polluting effects of burning coal. Those decisionmakers include legislators, regulators and utility executives, public interest groups, concerned community organizations and environmentalists who have been involved in the debate over the broader use of our most abundant fossil fuel - coal. The use of this resource, especially in large industrial and utility plants, has created widespread and intense public controversy. For the past four years INFORM has turned its research capabilities to defining cleaner and more economical ways of using US coal supplies. We have focused on finding out what cleaning coal and using flue gas desulfurization systems (called scrubbers) can contribute to reducing the polluting effects of burning coal in utility plants. All in all, both scrubbers and coal cleaning offer exciting and important possibilities for putting more coal to work in generating power in this country more economically and still meeting critical air quality standards that have been set to protect public health. The need for accurate and clear information concerning these technologies is evident: 80% of the sulfur dioxide emissions in the US now come from utility power plant operations, and over 140 existing oil-fired power plants are candidates for conversion to coal use. We hope that this documentation of the technologies of scrubber systems along with INFORM's companion study of coal cleaning, may help government and business planners and concerned citizens chart intelligent future courses and set realistic goals for meeting our energy needs in an environmentally sound manner.

  14. CHARACTERIZATION OF DWPF MELTER OFF-GAS QUENCHER AND STEAM ATOMIZED SCRUBBER DEPOSIT SAMPLES

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Zeigler, K; Ned Bibler, N

    2007-06-06

    This report summarizes the results from the characterization of deposits from the inlets of the primary off-gas Quencher and Steam Atomized Scrubber (SAS) in the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF), as requested by a technical assistance request. DWPF requested elemental analysis and compound identification to help determine the potential causes for the substance formation. This information will be fed into Savannah River National Laboratory modeling programs to determine if there is a way to decrease the formation of the deposits. The general approach to the characterization of these samples included x-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and chemical analysis. The following conclusions are drawn from the analytical results found in this report: (1) The deposits are not high level waste glass from the DWPF melt pool based on comparison of the compositions of deposits to the composition of a sample of glass taken from the pour stream of the melter during processing of Sludge Batch 3. (2) Chemical composition results suggest that the deposits are probably a combination of sludge and frit particles entrained in the off-gas. (3) Gamma emitters, such as Co-60, Cs-137, Eu-154, Am-241, and Am-243 were detected in both the Quencher and SAS samples with Cs-137 having the highest concentration of the gamma emitters. (4) No evidence existed for accumulation of fissile material (U-233, U-235, and Pu-239) relative to Fe in either deposit. (5) XRD results indicated both samples were primarily amorphorous and contained some crystals of the iron oxides, hematite and magnetite (Fe{sub 2}O{sub 3} and Fe(Fe{sub 2}O{sub 4})), along with sodium nitrate (NaNO{sub 3}). The other main crystalline compound in the SAS deposit was mercurous chloride. The main crystalline compound in the Quencher deposit was a uranium oxide compound. These are all sludge components. (6) SEM analysis of the Quencher deposit revealed crystalline uranium compounds within the sample. SEM analysis of the SAS sample could not be performed due to the presence of a significant concentration of Hg in the sample. (7) Essentially all the Na and the S in the off-gas samples were soluble in water. (8) The main soluble anion was NO{sub 3}{sup -} with SO{sub 4}{sup 2-} being second. (9) In contrast to the results for the off-gas deposits analyzed in 2003, soluble compounds of fluoride and chloride were detected; however, their concentrations in the Quencher and SAS deposits were less than one weight percent. (10) The results suggest that the S is primarily in the deposits as the sulfate anion.

  15. Analysis of a wet scrubber network in the air remediation of industrial workplaces: benefit for the city air quality

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Avveduto, Alessandro; Pace, Lorenzo; Curci, Gabriele; Monaco, Alessio; De Giovanni, Marina; Giammaria, Franco; Spanto, Giuseppe; Tripodi, Paolo

    2015-01-01

    Industrial activities carried out in confined spaces are characterized by a very specific type of air pollution. The extended exposure to this kind of pollution is often highly harmful, resulting in dramatic effects both on health and safety aspects. The indoor industrial abatement systems, adopted to purify the air, are typically applied to the emission points. The processed air is subsequently emitted outside. In this study we present the experimental results of three-stage wet scrubber systems installed in the industrial workplace of a (i) fiberglass processing plant, where the highest exposure levels to volatile compounds are nowadays today monitored,and of a (ii) waste-to-energy plant, characterized by a very high particulate matter level. The adopted technology, to be used as complementing strategy,does not require special disposal procedures and the processed air is re-emitted in the same work environment for the benefit of the work operators. The operation of the scrubbers network during the working a...

  16. Passamaquoddy Technology Recovery Scrubber{trademark} at the Dragon Products, Inc. Cement Plant located in Thomaston, Maine. 1990 Annual technical report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1990-12-31

    The background and process of the Passamaquoddy Technology Recovery Scrubber{trademark} are described. The Scrubber was developed for Dragon Cement Plant in Thomaston, Maine and facilitates a number of process improvements. The exhaust gas is scrubbed of SO{sub 2} with better than 90% efficiency. The kiln dust is cleaned of alkalines and so can be returned to kiln feed instead of dumped to landfill. Potassium sulfate in commercial quantity and purity can be recovered. Distilled water is recovered which also has commercial potential. Thus, various benefits are accrued and no waste streams remain for disposal. The process is applicable to both wet and dry process cement kilns and appears to have potential in any industry which generates acidic gaseous exhausts and/or basic solid or liquid wastes.

  17. A 12-MW-scale pilot study of in-duct scrubbing (IDS) using a rotary atomizer

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Samuel, E.A.; Murphy, K.R.; Demian, A.

    1989-11-01

    A low-cost, moderate-removal efficiency, flue gas desulfurization (FGD) technology was selected by the US Department of Energy for pilot demonstration in its Acid Rain Precursor Control Technology Initiative. The process, identified as In-Duct Scrubbing (IDS), applies rotary atomizer techniques developed for lime-based spray dryer FGD while utilizing existing flue gas ductwork and particulate collectors. IDS technology is anticipated to result in a dry desulfurization process with a moderate removal efficiency (50% or greater) for high-sulfur coal-fired boilers. The critical elements for successful application are: (1) adequate mixing of sorbent droplets with flue gas for efficient reaction contact, (2) sufficient residence time to produce a non-wetting product, and (3) appropriate ductwork cross-sectional area to prevent deposition of wet reaction products before particle drying is comple. The ductwork in many older plants, previously modified to meet 1970 Clean Air Act requirements for particulate control, usually meet these criteria. A 12 MW-scale IDS pilot plant was constructed at the Muskingum River Plant of the American Electric Power System. The pilot plant, which operates from a slipstrem attached to the air-preheater outlet duct from the Unit 5 boiler at the Muskingum River Plant (which burns about 4% sulfur coal), is equipped with three atomizer stations to test the IDS concept in vertical and horizontal configurations. In addition, the pilot plant is equipped to test the effect of injecting IDS off- product upstream of the atomizer, on SO{sub 2}and NO{sub x} removals.

  18. SUBMERGED GRAVEL SCRUBBER DEMONSTRATION AS A PASSIVE AIR CLEANER FOR CONTAINMENT VENTING AND PURGING WITH SODIUM AEROSOLS -- CSTF TESTS AC7 - AC10

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    HILLIARD, R K.; MCCORMACK, J D.; POSTMA, A K.

    1981-11-01

    Four large-scale air cleaning tests (AC7 - AC10) were performed in the Containment Systems Test Facility (CS'lF) to demonstrate the performance of a Submerged Gravel Scrubber for cleaning the effluent gas from a vented and purged breeder reactor containment vessel. The test article, comprised of a Submerged Gravel Scrubber (SGS) followed by a high efficiency fiber demister, had a design gas flow rate of 0.47 m{sup 3}/s (1000 ft{sup 3}/min) at a pressure drop of 9.0 kPa (36 in. H{sub 2}O). The test aerosol was sodium oxide, sodium hydroxide, or sodium carbonate generated in the 850-m{sup 3} CSTF vessel by continuously spraying sodium into the air-filled vessel while adding steam or carbon dioxide. Approximately 4500 kg (10,000 lb) of sodium was sprayed over a total period of 100 h during the tests. The SGS/Demister system was shown to be highly efficient (removing ~99.98% of the entering sodium aerosol mass), had a high mass loading capacity, and operated in a passive manner, with no electrical requirement. Models for predicting aerosol capture, gas cooling, and pressure drop are developed and compared with experimental results.

  19. Design/installation and structural integrity assessment of Bethel Valley low-level waste collection and transfer system upgrade for Building 3092 (Central Off-Gas Scrubber Facility) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    NONE

    1995-01-01

    This document describes and assesses planned modifications to be made to the Building 3092 Central Off-Gas Scrubber Facility of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The modifications are made in responsible to the requirements of 40CFR264 Subpart J, relating to environmental protection requirements for buried tank systems. The modifications include the provision of a new scrubber recirculation tank in a new, below ground, lines concrete vault, replacing and existing recirculation sump that does not provide double containment. A new buried, double contained pipeline is provided to permit discharge of spent scrubber recirculation fluid to the Central Waste Collection Header. The new vault, tank, and discharge line are provided with leak detection and provisions to remove accumulated liquid. New scrubber recirculation pumps, piping, and accessories are also provided. This assessment concludes that the planned modifications comply with applicable requirements of 40CFR264 Subpart J, as set forth in Appendix F to the Federal Facility Agreement, Docket No. 89-04-FF, covering the Oak Ridge Reservation.

  20. Zevenhoven & Kilpinen CROSS EFFECTS, TOTAL SYSTEM LAY-OUT 13.6.2001 10-1 Figure 10.1 Typical pulverised coal combustion and gas clean-up system: dry scrubber +

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Zevenhoven, Ron

    pulverised coal combustion and gas clean-up system: dry scrubber + baghouse filter for SO2 and particulate the emissions regulations depend on process type and plant size. Some compounds such as alkali or chlorine may For a conventional pulverised coal-fired power plant a set-up is shown in Figure 10.1, with a gas clean-up system

  1. Waste Treatment And Immobilization Plant U. S. Department Of Energy Office Of River Protection Submerged Bed Scrubber Condensate Disposition Project - Abstract # 13460

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Yanochko, Ronald M; Corcoran, Connie

    2012-11-15

    The Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) will generate an off-gas treatment system secondary liquid waste stream [submerged bed scrubber (SBS) condensate], which is currently planned for recycle back to the WTP Low Activity Waste (LAW) melter. This SBS condensate waste stream is high in Tc-99, which is not efficiently captured in the vitrified glass matrix. A pre-conceptual engineering study was prepared in fiscal year 2012 to evaluate alternate flow paths for melter off-gas secondary liquid waste generated by the WTP LAW facility. This study evaluated alternatives for direct off-site disposal of this SBS without pre-treatment, which mitigates potential issues associated with recycling.

  2. Fluid placement of fixated scrubber sludge to reduce surface subsidence and to abate acid mine drainage in abandoned underground coal mines

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Meiers, R.J.; Golden, D.; Gray, R.; Yu, W.C.

    1995-12-31

    Indianapolis Power and Light Company (IPL) began researching the use of fluid placement techniques of the fixated scrubber sludge (FSS) to reduce surface subsidence from underground coal mines to develop an economic alternative to low strength concrete grout. Abandoned underground coal mines surround property adjacent to IPL`s coal combustion by-product (CCBP) landfill at the Petersburg Generating Station. Landfill expansion into these areas is in question because of the high potential for sinkhole subsidence to develop. Sinkholes manifesting at the surface would put the integrity of a liner or runoff pond containment structure for a CCBP disposal facility at risk. The fluid placement techniques of the FSS as a subsidence abatement technology was demonstrated during an eight week period in September, October, and November 1994 at the Petersburg Generating Station. The success of this technology will be determined by the percentage of the mine void filled, strength of the FSS placed, and the overall effects on the hydrogeologic environment. The complete report for this project will be finalized in early 1996.

  3. Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant U. S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection Submerged Bed Scrubber Condensate Disposition Project - 13460

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Yanochko, Ronald M. [Washington River Protection Solutions, P.O. Box 850, Richland, Washington 99352 (United States)] [Washington River Protection Solutions, P.O. Box 850, Richland, Washington 99352 (United States); Corcoran, Connie [AEM Consulting, LLC, 1201 Jadwin Avenue, Richland, Washington 99352 (United States)] [AEM Consulting, LLC, 1201 Jadwin Avenue, Richland, Washington 99352 (United States)

    2013-07-01

    The Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) will generate an off-gas treatment system secondary liquid waste stream [submerged bed scrubber (SBS) condensate], which is currently planned for recycle back to the WTP Low Activity Waste (LAW) melter. This SBS condensate waste stream is high in Tc-99, which is not efficiently captured in the vitrified glass matrix [1]. A pre-conceptual engineering study was prepared in fiscal year 2012 to evaluate alternate flow paths for melter off-gas secondary liquid waste generated by the WTP LAW facility [2]. This study evaluated alternatives for direct off-site disposal of this SBS without pre-treatment, which mitigates potential issues associated with recycling. This study [2] concluded that SBS direct disposal is a viable option to the WTP baseline. The results show: - Off-site transportation and disposal of the SBS condensate is achievable and cost effective. - Reduction of approximately 4,325 vitrified WTP Low Activity Waste canisters could be realized. - Positive WTP operational impacts; minimal WTP construction impacts are realized. - Reduction of mass flow from the LAW Facility to the Pretreatment Facility by 66%. - Improved Double Shell Tank (DST) space management is a benefit. (authors)

  4. Characterizing toxic emissions from a coal-fired power plant demonstrating the AFGD ICCT Project and a plant utilizing a dry scrubber/baghouse system: Bailly Station Units 7 and 8 and AFGD ICCT Project. Final report. Final report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Dismukes, E.B.

    1994-10-20

    This report describes results of assessment of the risk of emissions of hazardous air pollutants at one of the electric power stations, Bailly Station, which is also the site of a Clean Coal Technology project demonstrating the Pure Air Advanced Flue Gas Desulfurization process (wet limestone). This station represents the configuration of no NO{sub x} reduction, particulate control with electrostatic precipitators, and SO{sub 2} control with a wet scrubber. The test was conducted September 3--6, 1993. Sixteen trace metals were determined along with 5 major metals. Other inorganic substances and organic compounds were also determined.

  5. CX-009842: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Demonstration of Multipollutant Reduction using a Lextran 3-in-1 Wet Scrubber CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 01/30/2013 Location(s): North Dakota Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  6. Transition to turbulence in duct flow

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Biau, Damien; Bottaro, Alessandro; 10.1017/S0022112007009536

    2010-01-01

    The transition of the flow in a duct of square cross-section is studied. Like in the similar case of the pipe flow, the motion is linearly stable for all Reynolds numbers; this flow is thus a good candidate to investigate the 'bypass' path to turbulence. Initially the so-called 'linear optimal perturbation problem' is formulated and solved, yielding optimal disturbances in the form of longitudinal vortices. Such optimals, however, fail to elicit a significant response from the system in the nonlinear regime. Thus, streamwise-inhomogeneous, sub-optimal disturbances are focussed upon; nonlinear quadratic interactions are immediately evoked by such initial perturbations and an unstable streamwise-homogeneous large amplitude mode rapidly emerges. The subsequent evolution of the flow, at a value of the Reynolds number at the edge between fully developed turbulence and relaminarization, shows the alternance of patterns with two pairs of large scale vortices near opposing parallel walls. Such edge states bear a rese...

  7. CX-004778: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Recovery Act: Innovative Carbon Dioxide Sequestration from Flue Gas using an In-Duct ScrubberCX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6Date: 12/27/2010Location(s): Point Comfort, TexasOffice(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  8. Energy minimization for the flow in ducts and networks

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Sochi, Taha

    2014-01-01

    The present paper is an attempt to demonstrate how the energy minimization principle may be considered as a governing rule for the physical equilibrium that determines the flow fields in tubes and networks. We previously investigated this issue using a numerical stochastic method, specifically simulated annealing, where we demonstrated the problem by some illuminating examples and concluded that energy minimization principle can be a valid hypothesis. The investigation in this paper is more general as it is based to a certain extent on an analytical approach.

  9. Minimizing Energy Losses in Ducts | Department of Energy

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    is critical. In recent years, energy-saving designs have sought to include ducts and heating systems in the conditioned space. Many existing duct systems lose a lot of energy...

  10. Minimizing Energy Losses in Ducts | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    AFDC Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to EERE: Alternative Fuels Data Center Home Page to someone by E-mail Share EERE: Alternative Fuels Data Center Home Page on Facebook Tweet about EERE: Alternative Fuels Data Center Home Page on Twitter Bookmark EERE: Alternative Fuels Data Center Homesum_a_epg0_fpd_mmcf_m.xls" ,"Available from WebQuantity of Natural GasAdjustmentsShirley Ann Jackson About1996How to Applythe Public UtilitynDE-FOA-0000051.rtfMiddleReaps Benefits

  11. Minimizing Energy Losses in Ducts | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    AFDC Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to EERE: Alternative Fuels Data Center Home Page to someone by E-mail Share EERE: Alternative Fuels Data Center Home Page on Facebook Tweet about EERE: Alternative Fuels Data Center Home Page on Twitter Bookmark EERE: Alternative Fuels Data Center Home Page on Google Bookmark EERE: Alternative Fuels Data Center Home Page on Delicious Rank EERE: Alternative Fuelsof EnergyApril 2014 |Department ofMay 2013EnergyIQAfromDepartment

  12. Evaporation of iodine-containing off-gas scrubber solution

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Partridge, J.A.; Bosuego, G.P.

    1980-07-14

    Mercuric nitrate-nitric acid scrub solutions containing radioiodine may be reduced in volume without excessive loss of volatile iodine. The use of concentrated nitric acid during an evaporation process oxidizes the mercury-iodide complex to a less volatile mercuric iodate precipitate.

  13. China's rapid deployment of SO2 scrubbers Robert H. Williamsb

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    In the language of the Environmental Kuznets Curve, studies have indicated that China has not been rich enough

  14. Guarantee Testing Results from the Greenidge Mult-Pollutant Control Project

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Daniel P. Connell; James E. Locke

    2008-02-01

    CONSOL Energy Inc. Research & Development (CONSOL R&D) performed flue gas sampling at AES Greenidge to verify the performance of the multi-pollutant control system recently installed by Babcock Power Environmental Inc. (BPEI) on the 107-megawatt (MW) Unit 4 (Boiler 6). The multi-pollutant control system includes combustion modifications and a hybrid selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR)/induct selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system to reduce NO{sub x} emissions, followed by a Turbosorp{reg_sign} circulating fluidized bed dry scrubber system and baghouse to reduce emissions of SO{sub 2}, SO{sub 3}, HCl, HF, and particulate matter. Mercury removal is provided via the co-benefits afforded by the in-duct SCR, dry scrubber, and baghouse and by injection of activated carbon upstream of the scrubber, as required. Testing was conducted through ports located at the inlet and outlet of the SCR reactor to evaluate the performance of the hybrid NO{sub x} control system, as well as through ports located at the air heater outlet and baghouse outlet or stack to determine pollutant removal efficiencies across the Turbosorp{reg_sign} scrubber and baghouse. Data from the unit's stack continuous emission monitor (CEM) were also used for determining attainment of the performance targets for NO{sub x} emissions and SO{sub 2} removal efficiency.

  15. Deterministic and stochastic algorithms for resolving the flow fields in ducts and networks using energy minimization

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Sochi, Taha

    2014-01-01

    Several deterministic and stochastic multi-variable global optimization algorithms (Conjugate Gradient, Nelder-Mead, Quasi-Newton, and Global) are investigated in conjunction with energy minimization principle to resolve the pressure and volumetric flow rate fields in single ducts and networks of interconnected ducts. The algorithms are tested with seven types of fluid: Newtonian, power law, Bingham, Herschel-Bulkley, Ellis, Ree-Eyring and Casson. The results obtained from all those algorithms for all these types of fluid agree very well with the analytically derived solutions as obtained from the traditional methods which are based on the conservation principles and fluid constitutive relations. The results confirm and generalize the findings of our previous investigations that the energy minimization principle is at the heart of the flow dynamics systems. The investigation also enriches the methods of Computational Fluid Dynamics for solving the flow fields in tubes and networks for various types of Newtoni...

  16. Turbulent mixing in ducts, theory and experiment application to aerosol single point sampling 

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Langari, Abdolreza

    1997-01-01

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced rules for continuous emissions monitoring (CEM) of stacks and ducts in nuclear facilities. EPA has recently approved use of Alternative Reference Methodologies (ARM) for air sampling in nuclear...

  17. Global evaluation of mass transfer effects: In-duct injection flue gas desulfurization

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Cole, J.A.; Newton, G.H.; Kramlich, J.C.; Payne, R.

    1990-09-30

    Sorbent injection is a low capital cost, low operating cost approach to SO{sub 2} control targeted primarily at older boilers for which conventional fuel gas desulfurization is not economically viable. Duct injection is one variation of this concept in which the sorbent, either a dry powder or a slurry, is injected into the cooler regions of the boiler, generally downstream of the air heaters. The attractiveness of duct injection is tied to the fact that it avoids much of the boiler heat transfer equipment and thus has minimal impact of boiler performance. Both capital and operating cost are low. This program has as its objectives three performance related issues to address: (1) experimentally identify limits on sorbent performance. (2) identify and test sorbent performance enhancement strategies. (3) develop a compute model of the duct injection process. Two major tasks are described: a laboratory-scale global experiment and development of process model. Both are aimed at understanding and quantifying the rate-limiting processes which control SO{sub 2} capture by lime slurry during boiler duct injection. 29 refs., 35 figs., 4 tabs.

  18. Recovery Act: Innovative CO2 Sequestration from Flue Gas Using Industrial Sources and Innovative Concept for Beneficial CO2 Use

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Dando, Neal; Gershenzon, Mike; Ghosh, Rajat

    2012-07-31

    field testing of a biomimetic in-duct scrubbing system for the capture of gaseous CO2 coupled with sequestration of captured carbon by carbonation of alkaline industrial wastes. The Phase 2 project, reported on here, combined efforts in enzyme development, scrubber optimization, and sequestrant evaluations to perform an economic feasibility study of technology deployment. The optimization of carbonic anhydrase (CA) enzyme reactivity and stability are critical steps in deployment of this technology. A variety of CA enzyme variants were evaluated for reactivity and stability in both bench scale and in laboratory pilot scale testing to determine current limits in enzyme performance. Optimization of scrubber design allowed for improved process economics while maintaining desired capture efficiencies. A range of configurations, materials, and operating conditions were examined at the Alcoa Technical Center on a pilot scale scrubber. This work indicated that a cross current flow utilizing a specialized gas-liquid contactor offered the lowest system operating energy. Various industrial waste materials were evaluated as sources of alkalinity for the scrubber feed solution and as sources of calcium for precipitation of carbonate. Solids were mixed with a simulated sodium bicarbonate scrubber blowdown to comparatively examine reactivity. Supernatant solutions and post-test solids were analyzed to quantify and model the sequestration reactions. The best performing solids were found to sequester between 2.3 and 2.9 moles of CO2 per kg of dry solid in 1-4 hours of reaction time. These best performing solids were cement kiln dust, circulating dry scrubber ash, and spray dryer absorber ash. A techno-economic analysis was performed to evaluate the commercial viability of the proposed carbon capture and sequestration process in full-scale at an aluminum smelter and a refinery location. For both cases the in-duct scrubber technology was compared to traditional amine- based capture. Incorporation of the laboratory results showed that for the application at the aluminum smelter, the in-duct scrubber system is more economical than traditional methods. However, the reverse is true for the refinery case, where the bauxite residue is not effective enough as a sequestrant, combined with challenges related to contaminants in the bauxite residue accumulating in and fouling the scrubber absorbent. Sensitivity analyses showed that the critical variables by which process economics could be improved are enzyme concentration, efficiency, and half-life. At the end of the first part of the Phase 2 project, a gate review (DOE Decision Zero Gate Point) was conducted to decide on the next stages of the project. The original plan was to follow the pre-testing phase with a detailed design for the field testing. Unfavorable process economics, however, resulted in a decision to conclude the project before moving to field testing. It is noted that CO2 Solutions proposed an initial solution to reduce process costs through more advanced enzyme management, however, DOE program requirements restricting any technology development extending beyond 2014 as commercial deployment timeline did not allow this solution to be undertaken.

  19. Option valuation of flexible investments : the case of a scrubber for coal-fired power plant

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Herbelot, Olivier

    1994-01-01

    Standard discounted cash flow methods are not well suited to the valuation of investments whose characteristics can be modified by the decision-maker after the initial investment decision has been made (multistage decision ...

  20. GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PSW-GTR-196 Sudden Oak Death Bike Tire Scrubber1

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    transport by humans. Key words: Phytophthora ramorum, invasive species, mountain bikes 1 An abstract to 21, 2005, Monterey, California. 2 Department of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Dominican University of California, San Rafael, California 94901; for correspondence: Peter.Thut@wwu.edu 3 Department

  1. Mercuric iodate precipitation from radioiodine-containing off-gas scrubber solution

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Partridge, Jerry A. (Richland, WA); Bosuego, Gail P. (Richland, WA)

    1982-01-01

    Mercuric nitrate-nitric acid scrub solutions containing radioiodine may be reduced in volume without excessive loss of volatile iodine. The use of concentrated nitric acid during an evaporation process oxidizes the mercury-iodide complex to a less volatile mercuric iodate precipitate.

  2. Evaluation of mixing downstream of tees in duct systems with respect to single point representative air sampling 

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Kim, Taehong

    2003-01-01

    Air duct systems in nuclear facilities must meet the requirements of ANSI N13.1-1999 and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that the exhaust airflow be monitored with continuous sampling in case of an accidental release of airborne...

  3. Chapter 6 x Viscous Flow in Ducts 467 (c) 132000, 0.0170, hence the reduction in f is

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Bahrami, Majid

    to the likely suspect, gasoline. Ans. 6.54* A swimming pool W by Y by h deep is to be emptied by gravity through) 0.0314 smoothf Ans. § · ¨ ¸© ¹ Re 46% 6.51 The viscous sublayer (Fig. 6.10) is normally less than 1 s § · |¨ ¸© ¹ The sublayer thickness is defined by y | 5.0 Uyu*/P. Thus sublayer 5 5(0.0311) y 0.0154 ft u* (2.44)(4.13) Ans

  4. Advanced in-duct sorbent injection for SO{sub 2} control. Topical report number 3, Subtask 2.3: Sorbent optimization

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Rosenhoover, W.A.; Maskew, J.T.; Withum, J.A.; Stouffer, M.R.

    1994-11-01

    The objective of this research project is to develop second-generation duct injection technology as a cost-effective compliance option for the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. Specific process performance goals are to achieve 90% SO{sub 2} removal and 60% sorbent utilization efficiency. Research is focused on the Advanced Coolside process, which has shown the potential of achieving these targets. The objective of Subtask 2.3, Sorbent Optimization, was to explore means of improving performance and economics of the Advanced Coolside process through optimizing the sorbent system. Pilot plant tests of commercial and specially prepared hydrated limes showed that the process is relatively insensitive to sorbent source. This can be an important economic advantage, allowing the use of the lowest cost sorbent available at a site. A pilot plant hydration study conducted in cooperation with Dravo Lime Company further indicated the relative insensitivity of process performance to lime source and to lime physical properties. Pilot plant tests indicated that the use of very small amounts of additives in the Advanced Coolside process can improve performance under some circumstances; however, additives are not necessary to exceed process performance targets.

  5. Combined SO{sub 2}/NO{sub x} control using ferrous{center_dot}EDTA and a secondary additive in a lime-based aqueous scrubber system

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Mendelsohn, M.H.; Livengood, C.D.; Harkness, J.B.L.

    1991-12-01

    Integration of NO{sub x} control into existing flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) systems addresses site-specific control requirements while minimizing retrofit difficulties. Argonne has studied the use of the metal-chelate additives, such as ferrous{center_dot}EDTA in various wet FGD chemistries, to promote combined SO{sub 2}/NO{sub x} scrubbing. A major process problem is oxidation of the iron to the ferric species, leading to a significant decrease in NO{sub x}-removal capability. Argonne discovered a class of organic compounds that, when used with ferrous{center_dot}EDTA in a sodium carbonate chemistry, could maintain high levels of NO{sub x} removal. However, those antioxidant/reducing agents are not effective in a lime-based chemistry, and a broader investigation of antioxidants was initiated. This paper discusses results of that investigation, which found a practical antioxidant/reducing agent capable of maintaining NO{sub x} removals of about 50% (compared with about 15% without the agent) in a lime-based FGD chemistry with FE(II){center_dot}EDTA. 5 refs., 10 figs.

  6. Combined SO sub 2 /NO sub x control using ferrouster dot EDTA and a secondary additive in a lime-based aqueous scrubber system. [Sodium ascorbate

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Mendelsohn, M.H.; Livengood, C.D.; Harkness, J.B.L.

    1991-01-01

    Integration of NO{sub x} control into existing flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) systems addresses site-specific control requirements while minimizing retrofit difficulties. Argonne has studied the use of the metal-chelate additives, such as ferrous{center dot}EDTA in various wet FGD chemistries, to promote combined SO{sub 2}/NO{sub x} scrubbing. A major process problem is oxidation of the iron to the ferric species, leading to a significant decrease in NO{sub x}-removal capability. Argonne discovered a class of organic compounds that, when used with ferrous{center dot}EDTA in a sodium carbonate chemistry, could maintain high levels of NO{sub x} removal. However, those antioxidant/reducing agents are not effective in a lime-based chemistry, and a broader investigation of antioxidants was initiated. This paper discusses results of that investigation, which found a practical antioxidant/reducing agent capable of maintaining NO{sub x} removals of about 50% (compared with about 15% without the agent) in a lime-based FGD chemistry with FE(II){center dot}EDTA. 5 refs., 10 figs.

  7. Separation of flue-gas scrubber sludge into marketable products. Third quarterly technical progress report, March 1, 1994--May 31, 1994

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kawatra, S.K.; Eisele, T.C.; Shoop, K.

    1994-06-01

    Column flotation represents a significant improvement over conventional flotation for many applications. This improvement consists of increased selectivity between hydrophobic and hydrophilic particles, which allows the column to produce higher-purity products. A schematic of the column used is given in Figure 1. The basic procedure for the flotation column experiments was as follows: 500 grams of the sludge from Plant A (prepared as described in the Second Quarterly Report) was suspended at 40% solids in distilled water, to produce 1600 ml of slurry. Reagents were added, and the slurry was agitated vigorously for 1 minute. Frother was added to all of the water to be added to the column, at a rate of 0.03 grams/liter (approximately 0.4 kilograms per metric ton, Kg/mt). The frother used was Dowfroth 200 (a mixture of polypropylene glycol methyl ethers, with a mean molecular weight of 200). The column was started, all of the water flowrates were set as desired, and the drain valve was closed. As soon as the water level had reached the base of the feed inlet tube (approximately 1 minute after closing the drain valve), the 1600 ml feed slurry was added over a 15 second interval. This allowed the feed to be added to the column with a minimum of disturbance to the froth layer, and without causing either surging of the pulp level or large losses to the sinks product. Flotation was carried out for 9 minutes after closing the drain valve. Froth and sinks products were collected, filtered, dried at 45{degrees}C, weighed, and analyzed by thermogravimetic analysis. It is readily seen that, when no collector is added, the column produces a product that is markedly higher purity than that produced by conventional flotation. The addition of oleic acid collector to the column feed is not able to produce any further improvement in product quality, and only results in a loss of product recovery.

  8. ENERGY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE COAL-ELECTRIC CYCLE

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Ferrell, G.C.

    2010-01-01

    1969. "Scrubber Survey: a Lime/Limestone Trend," ElectricalMills/Kwh Process Limestone Lime Magnesia Cat-Ox Sodium Tonsto Unsaturated Operation of Lime and Limestone Scrubbers,"

  9. Addendum to Guarantee Testing Results from the Greenidge Multi-Pollutant Control Project: Additiona NH3, NOx, and CO Testing Results

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Daniel P. Connell; James E. Locke

    2008-03-01

    On March 28-30 and May 1-4, 2007, CONSOL Energy Inc. Research & Development (CONSOL R&D) performed flue gas sampling at AES Greenidge to verify the performance of the multi-pollutant control system recently installed by Babcock Power Environmental Inc. (BPEI) on the 107-MW Unit 4 (Boiler 6). The multi-pollutant control system includes combustion modifications and a hybrid selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR)/in-duct selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system to reduce NO{sub x} emissions, followed by a Turbosorp{reg_sign} circulating fluidized bed dry scrubber system and baghouse to reduce emissions of SO{sub 2}, SO{sub 3}, HCl, HF, and particulate matter. Mercury removal is provided via the co-benefits afforded by the in-duct SCR, dry scrubber, and baghouse and by injection of activated carbon upstream of the scrubber, as required. The testing in March and May demonstrated that the multi-pollutant control system attained its performance targets for NO{sub x} emissions, SO{sub 2} removal efficiency, acid gas (SO{sub 3}, HCl, and HF) removal efficiency, and mercury removal efficiency. However, the ammonia slip measured between the SCR outlet and air heater inlet was consistently greater than the guarantee of 2 ppmvd {at} 3% O{sub 2}. As a result, additional testing was performed on May 30-June 1 and on June 20-21, 2007, in conjunction with tuning of the hybrid NO{sub x} control system by BPEI, in an effort to achieve the performance target for ammonia slip. This additional testing occurred after the installation of a large particle ash (LPA) screen and removal system just above the SCR reactor and a fresh SCR catalyst layer in mid-May. This report describes the results of the additional tests. During the May 30-June 1 sampling period, CONSOL R&D and Clean Air Engineering (CAE) each measured flue gas ammonia concentrations at the air heater inlet, downstream of the in-duct SCR reactor. In addition, CONSOL R&D measured flue gas ammonia concentrations at the economizer outlet, upstream of the SCR reactor, and CAE measured flue gas NO{sub x} and CO concentrations at the sampling grids located at the inlet and outlet of the SCR reactor. During the June 20-21 sampling period, CONSOL R&D measured flue gas ammonia concentrations at the air heater inlet. All ammonia measurements were performed using a modified version of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Conditional Test Method (CTM) 027. The NO{sub x} and CO measurements were performed using U.S. EPA Methods 7E and 10, respectively.

  10. Greenridge Multi-Pollutant Control Project Preliminary Public Design Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Daniel P. Connell

    2009-01-12

    The Greenidge Multi-Pollutant Control Project is being conducted as part of the U.S. Department of Energy's Power Plant Improvement Initiative to demonstrate an innovative combination of air pollution control technologies that can cost-effectively reduce emissions of SO{sub 2}, NO{sub x}, Hg, acid gases (SO{sub 3}, HCl, and HF), and particulate matter from smaller coal-fired electrical generating units (EGUs). The multi-pollutant control system includes a hybrid selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR)/in-duct selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system to reduce NOx emissions by {ge}60%, followed by a Turbosorp{reg_sign} circulating fluidized bed dry scrubber system to reduce emissions of SO{sub 2}, SO{sub 3}, HCl, and HF by {ge}95%. Mercury removal of {ge}90% is also targeted via the co-benefits afforded by the in-duct SCR, dry scrubber, and baghouse and by injection of activated carbon upstream of the scrubber, as required. The technology is particularly well suited, because of its relatively low capital and maintenance costs and small space requirements, to meet the needs of coal-fired units with capacities of 50-300 MWe. There are about 440 such units in the United States that currently are not equipped with SCR, flue gas desulfurization (FGD), or mercury control systems. These smaller units are a valuable part of the nation's energy infrastructure, constituting about 60 GW of installed capacity. However, with the onset of the Clean Air Interstate Rule, Clean Air Mercury Rule, and various state environmental actions requiring deep reductions in emissions of SO{sub 2}, NO{sub x}, and mercury, the continued operation of these units increasingly depends upon the ability to identify viable air pollution control retrofit options for them. The large capital costs and sizable space requirements associated with conventional technologies such as SCR and wet FGD make these technologies unattractive for many smaller units. The Greenidge Project aims to confirm the commercial readiness of an emissions control system that is specifically designed to meet the environmental compliance requirements of these smaller coal-fired EGUs. The multi-pollutant control system is being installed and tested on the AES Greenidge Unit 4 (Boiler 6) by a team including CONSOL Energy Inc. as prime contractor, AES Greenidge LLC as host site owner, and Babcock Power Environmental Inc. as engineering, procurement, and construction contractor. All funding for the project is being provided by the U.S. Department of Energy, through its National Energy Technology Laboratory, and by AES Greenidge. AES Greenidge Unit 4 is a 107 MW{sub e} (net), 1950s vintage, tangentially-fired, reheat unit that is representative of many of the 440 smaller coal-fired units identified above. Following design and construction, the multi-pollutant control system will be demonstrated over an approximately 20-month period while the unit fires 2-4% sulfur eastern U.S. bituminous coal and co-fires up to 10% biomass. This Preliminary Public Design Report is the first in a series of two reports describing the design of the multi-pollutant control facility that is being demonstrated at AES Greenidge. Its purpose is to consolidate for public use all available nonproprietary design information on the Greenidge Multi-Pollutant Control Project. As such, the report includes a discussion of the process concept, design objectives, design considerations, and uncertainties associated with the multi-pollutant control system and also summarizes the design of major process components and balance of plant considerations for the AES Greenidge Unit 4 installation. The Final Public Design Report, the second report in the series, will update this Preliminary Public Design Report to reflect the final, as-built design of the facility and to incorporate data on capital costs and projected operating costs.

  11. Chapter 6 x Viscous Flow in Ducts 493 For sheet steel, take H | 0.00015 ft, hence H/Dh | 0.000346. Now relate everything to the

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Bahrami, Majid

    .000346. Now relate everything to the input power: 2 f ft lbf Power 1 hp 550 gQh (0.00234)(32.2)Q[54.4fQ ], s U.01784, V | 80.4 ft/s, Q | 19.6 ft3/s. Ans. 6.91 Heat exchangers often consist of many triangular passages 252.9 L 0.6 870 Then f 0.263, p f V (0.263) (2) U § · § · | ' h201 D 2 0.012 2 Ans

  12. Flue gas desulfurization method and apparatus

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Madden, Deborah A. (Canfield, OH); Farthing, George A. (Washington Township, Stark County, OH)

    1998-08-18

    A combined furnace limestone injection and dry scrubber flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system collects solids from the flue gas stream in first particulate collection device located downstream of an outlet of a convection pass of the furnace and upstream of the dry scrubber. The collected solids are diverted to the dry scrubber feed slurry preparation system to increase sulfur oxide species removal efficiency and sorbent utilization. The level of lime in the feed slurry provided to the dry scrubber is thus increased, which enhances removal of sulfur oxide species in the dry scrubber. The decreased particulate loading to the dry scrubber helps maintain a desired degree of free moisture in the flue gas stream entering the dry scrubber, which enhances sulfur oxide species removal both in the dry scrubber and downstream particulate collector, normally a baghouse.

  13. Flue gas desulfurization method and apparatus

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Madden, Deborah A. (Canfield, OH); Farthing, George A. (Washington Township, OH)

    1998-09-29

    A combined furnace limestone injection and dry scrubber flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system collects solids from the flue gas stream in first particulate collection device located downstream of an outlet of a convection pass of the furnace and upstream of the dry scrubber. The collected solids are diverted to the dry scrubber feed slurry preparation system to increase sulfur oxide species removal efficiency and sorbent utilization. The level of lime in the feed slurry provided to the dry scrubber is thus increased, which enhances removal of sulfur oxide species in the dry scrubber. The decreased particulate loading to the dry scrubber helps maintain a desired degree of free moisture in the flue gas stream entering the dry scrubber, which enhances sulfur oxide species removal both in the dry scrubber and downstream particulate collector, normally a baghouse.

  14. National Level Co-Control Study of the Targets for Energy Intensity and Sulfur Dioxide in China

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Zhou, Nan

    2013-01-01

    3% Circulating fluid bed (CFB) dry scrubbers and 3% AmmoniaSeawater Scrubbing, 3% CFB, 3% Ammonia type and others, 3%1.1.3. Circulating fluid bed (CFB) dry scrubber The European

  15. Flue gas desulfurization method and apparatus

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Madden, D.A.; Farthing, G.A.

    1998-09-29

    A combined furnace limestone injection and dry scrubber flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system collects solids from the flue gas stream in first particulate collection device located downstream of an outlet of a convection pass of the furnace and upstream of the dry scrubber. The collected solids are diverted to the dry scrubber feed slurry preparation system to increase sulfur oxide species removal efficiency and sorbent utilization. The level of lime in the feed slurry provided to the dry scrubber is thus increased, which enhances removal of sulfur oxide species in the dry scrubber. The decreased particulate loading to the dry scrubber helps maintain a desired degree of free moisture in the flue gas stream entering the dry scrubber, which enhances sulfur oxide species removal both in the dry scrubber and downstream particulate collector, normally a baghouse. 5 figs.

  16. Flue gas desulfurization method and apparatus

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Madden, D.A.; Farthing, G.A.

    1998-08-18

    A combined furnace limestone injection and dry scrubber flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system collects solids from the flue gas stream in first particulate collection device located downstream of an outlet of a convection pass of the furnace and upstream of the dry scrubber. The collected solids are diverted to the dry scrubber feed slurry preparation system to increase sulfur oxide species removal efficiency and sorbent utilization. The level of lime in the feed slurry provided to the dry scrubber is thus increased, which enhances removal of sulfur oxide species in the dry scrubber. The decreased particulate loading to the dry scrubber helps maintain a desired degree of free moisture in the flue gas stream entering the dry scrubber, which enhances sulfur oxide species removal both in the dry scrubber and downstream particulate collector, normally a baghouse. 5 figs.

  17. RECLAIMing Air, Redefining Democracy : : A History of the Regional Clean Air Incentives Market, Environmental Justice, and Risk, 1960 - present

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Tribbett, Krystal L.

    2014-01-01

    acid rain: reduce these emissions by using lower sulfur content fuel, or by installing control technology known as scrubbers

  18. Technical Report for the MVB (MSW & Biomass) Waste to Energy Plants and the AVG Hazardous WTE Plant in Hamburg, Germany

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Columbia University

    is equipped with SNCR technology, baghouse filters, HCl & SO2 scrubbers Power Plant: Coal and Gas MVB Unit 3

  19. MARINE KELP: ENERGY RESOURCE IN THE COASTAL ZONE

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Ritschard, Ronald L.

    2014-01-01

    scrubber, as well as from other phases of processing/conversion, is also unknown. However, since marine

  20. Benefits of evaporating FGD purge water

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Shaw, W.A. [HPD, Plainfield, IL (United States)

    2008-03-15

    In the US and the European Union, scrubbers are installed on all new coal-fired power plants because their technology is considered the best available for removing SO{sub 2}. A zero liquid discharge (ZLD) system is the best technology for treating wet scrubber wastewate. With the future promising stricter limits on power plants' water use, ZLD systems that concentrate scrubber purge streams are sure to become as common as ZLD cooling tower blowdonw systems. 7 figs.

  1. Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants; Volume...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Rich Solvent Rich Solvent Direct Contact Cooler (DCC) and Polishing Scrubber Wash Water Filter DCC Circulating Water Filter Blower Condenser Product CO 2 Overhead...

  2. Life-cycle Assessment of Semiconductors

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Boyd, Sarah B.

    2009-01-01

    LBNL. Energy efficient cleanroom information site, 2000. [HVAC: Reduce ACR in cleanroom HVAC House Scrubber: Use highincluding more efficient cleanroom airflow (including the

  3. ENERGY ANALYSIS PROGRAM. CHAPTER FROM THE ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT DIVISION ANNUAL REPORT 1980

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Authors, Various

    2014-01-01

    Marine Kelp co, Water/ Nutrients Production System Harvesting Systern Processing System Alginic Conversion System r- Feed Supplements Recovery r--- Gas Scrubber ---

  4. Grouting at the Idaho National Laboratory Tank Farm Facility...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    fuel basin water treatment discharges - Off-gas scrubber solutions - Sump water and condensate from tank farm transfer equipment - Other low activity miscellaneous plant wastes *...

  5. bia-cemkiln | netl.doe.gov

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1990) Comprehensive Report to Congress Comprehensive Report to Congress on the Clean Coal Technology Program: Cement Kiln Flue Gas Recovery Scrubber PDF-1.5MB (Nov 1989)...

  6. Life-Cycle Environmental and Economic Assessment of Using Recycled Materials for Asphalt Pavements

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Horvath, Arpad

    2003-01-01

    1993] MOEE. Spent Foundry Sand - Alternative Uses Study.Flue Gas Scrubber Material Foundry Sands Kiln Dusts Mineralin highway construction is foundry sand. Silica sand coated

  7. LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS OF REGULATING INTERMEDIA POLLUTION

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Entman, R.M.

    2010-01-01

    waste (in the form of sludge and other pollution treatmenteasily disposed of than wet sludge." Further, consonant withliquid waste called scrubber sludge, and sometimes produces

  8. ENERGY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE COAL-ELECTRIC CYCLE

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Ferrell, G.C.

    2010-01-01

    scrubbers, advanced gasifiers (beyond the Lurgi), andBtu gas from advanced gasifiers have comparable costs forof integration between the gasifiers, clean up train, gas

  9. Greenidge Multi-Pollutant Control Project

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Daniel Connell

    2008-10-18

    The Greenidge Multi-Pollutant Control Project was conducted as part of the U.S. Department of Energy's Power Plant Improvement Initiative to demonstrate an innovative combination of air pollution control technologies that can cost-effectively reduce emissions of SO{sub 2}, NO{sub x}, Hg, acid gases (SO{sub 3}, HCl, and HF), and particulate matter from smaller coal-fired electric generating units (EGUs). There are about 400 units in the United States with capacities of 50-300 MW that currently are not equipped with selective catalytic reduction (SCR), flue gas desulfurization (FGD), or mercury control systems. Many of these units, which collectively represent more than 55 GW of installed capacity, are difficult to retrofit for deep emission reductions because of space constraints and unfavorable economies of scale, making them increasingly vulnerable to retirement or fuel switching in the face of progressively more stringent environmental regulations. The Greenidge Project sought to confirm the commercial readiness of an emissions control system that is specifically designed to meet the environmental compliance requirements of these smaller coal-fired EGUs by offering a combination of deep emission reductions, low capital costs, small space requirements, applicability to high-sulfur coals, mechanical simplicity, and operational flexibility. The multi-pollutant control system includes a NO{sub x}OUT CASCADE{reg_sign} hybrid selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR)/in-duct SCR system for NO{sub x} control and a Turbosorp{reg_sign} circulating fluidized bed dry scrubbing system (with a new baghouse) for SO{sub 2}, SO{sub 3}, HCl, HF, and particulate matter control. Mercury removal is provided as a co-benefit of the in-duct SCR, dry scrubber, and baghouse, and by injection of activated carbon upstream of the scrubber, if required. The multi-pollutant control system was installed and tested on the 107-MW{sub e}, 1953-vintage AES Greenidge Unit 4 by a team including CONSOL Energy Inc. as prime contractor, AES Greenidge LLC as host site owner, and Babcock Power Environmental Inc. as engineering, procurement, and construction contractor. About 44% of the funding for the project was provided by the U.S. Department of Energy, through its National Energy Technology Laboratory, and the remaining 56% was provided by AES Greenidge. Project goals included reducing high-load NO{sub x} emissions to {le} 0.10 lb/mmBtu; reducing SO{sub 2}, SO{sub 3}, HCl, and HF emissions by at least 95%; and reducing Hg emissions by at least 90% while the unit fired 2-4% sulfur eastern U.S. bituminous coal and co-fired up to 10% biomass. This report details the final results from the project. The multi-pollutant control system was constructed in 2006, with a total plant cost of $349/kW and a footprint of 0.4 acre - both substantially less than would have been required to retrofit AES Greenidge Unit 4 with a conventional SCR and wet scrubber. Start-up of the multi-pollutant control system was completed in March 2007, and the performance of the system was then evaluated over an approximately 18-month period of commercial operation. Guarantee tests conducted in March-June 2007 demonstrated attainment of all of the emission reduction goals listed above. Additional tests completed throughout the performance evaluation period showed 96% SO{sub 2} removal, 98% mercury removal (with no activated carbon injection), 95% SO{sub 3} removal, and 97% HCl removal during longer-term operation. Greater than 95% SO{sub 2} removal efficiency was observed even when the unit fired high-sulfur coals containing up to 4.8 lb SO{sub 2}/mmBtu. Particulate matter emissions were reduced by more than 98% relative to the emission rate observed prior to installation of the technology. The performance of the hybrid SNCR/SCR system was affected by problems with large particle ash, ammonia slip, and nonideal combustion characteristics, and high-load NO{sub x} emissions averaged 0.14 lb/mmBtu during long-term operation. Nevertheless, the system has reduced the unit's overall NO{sub x} emiss

  10. CX-009418: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Electron Beam Melting CX(s) Applied: None applied. Date: 10/30/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Kansas City Site Office

  11. CX-007571: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pulaski County - Wastewater CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/29/2011 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  12. CX-007596: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ohio Advanced Transportation Partnership CX(s) Applied: B5.23 Date: 01/25/2012 Location(s): Ohio Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  13. CX-012729: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hydrogen Sulfide Scavenger BOA (Multiple) CX(s) Applied: B5.2Date: 41880 Location(s): LouisianaOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  14. CX-008588: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    St. Petersburg Solar Pilot Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 07/19/2012 Location(s): Florida Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  15. CX-008684: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Metaline Radio Station Upgrade Project CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 07/11/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  16. CX-010148: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Merritt Radio Station Upgrade CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 04/18/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  17. CX-008706: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Tunk Mountain Radio Station Upgrade CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 05/30/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  18. CX-012716: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    General Scientific Infrastructure Support for University of Wisconsin CX(s) Applied: B1.31Date: 41844 Location(s): WisconsinOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  19. CX-008543: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Colorado State Energy Plan 2012 CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 06/25/2012 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  20. CX-012333: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Support Buildings CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 06/03/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  1. CX-011165: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Heavy Mineral Separation CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/07/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  2. CX-012817: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bell Maintenance Headquarters Access Road Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41890 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  3. CX-006225: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Infrastructure Upgrades - Materials and Fuel Complex (MFC)- Irradiated Materials Characterization Laboratory (IMCL) CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06072011 Location(s): Idaho Falls,...

  4. CX-010791: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Exclusion Determination Gulf of Mexico Miocene Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Site Characterization Mega Transect CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 08142013 Location(s): Texas...

  5. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Science | Department of...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Determination Establishment of an Easement for Enhanced Electrical Service to the Computational Sciences Facility CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 08302011 Location(s):...

  6. CX-011634: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Closure Turf Installation CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 08/27/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Pantex Site Office

  7. CX-008993: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CX-008993: Categorical Exclusion Determination "Continuous Processing of High Thermal Conductivity Polyethylene Fibers and Sheets CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 0822...

  8. CX-012776: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Catalyst Processing, KCP14-05 CX(s) Applied: NOT NOTEDDate: 41857 Location(s): MissouriOffices(s): Kansas City Site Office

  9. CX-008146: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Advanced Formation Evaluator Tools (Haliburton) CX(s) Applied: B3.7 Date: 09/11/2011 Location(s): Wyoming Offices(s): RMOTC

  10. CX-004095: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Exclusion Determination CX-004095: Categorical Exclusion Determination Thermal Transport Properties of Nanostructured Materials for Energy Conversion CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09...

  11. CX-008144: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Planned Repair of Flow Lines CX(s) Applied: B5.4 Date: 08/09/2011 Location(s): Wyoming Offices(s): RMOTC

  12. CX-009420: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Additive Manufacturing Using EOSINT M280 CX(s) Applied: None applied. Date: 10/30/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Kansas City Site Office

  13. CX-003164: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-003164: Categorical Exclusion Determination Optimization of Biomass Production Across a Landscape CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 07262010...

  14. CX-012730: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace West Hackberry Radio Tower CX(s) Applied: B1.19Date: 41880 Location(s): LouisianaOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  15. CX-011069: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Induction Furnace Melting CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/29/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  16. CX-010057: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Eugene Substation Protective Relay Installation CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 01/29/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  17. CX-011214: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sensitive Instrument Facility CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/10/2013 Location(s): Iowa Offices(s): Ames Site Office

  18. CX-012795: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    North Bonneville Substation 23- Kilovolt Line Retermination CX(s) Applied: B4.11Date: 41926 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  19. CX-010618: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Midwest Region Alternative Fuels Project CX(s) Applied: 0 Date: 07/19/2013 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  20. CX-012789: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Building 440 CNM Clean Room Expansion CX(s) Applied: B3.15Date: 41906 Location(s): IllinoisOffices(s): Argonne Site Office

  1. CX-008438: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Biogas Reconditioning Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 06/27/2012 Location(s): Nevada Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  2. CX-008282: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Biogas Reconditioning Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/01/2012 Location(s): Nevada Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  3. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Western Area PowerAdministratio...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Center October 26, 2009 CX-005544: Categorical Exclusion Determination Power Rate Formula for the Provo River Project of the Western Area Power Administration CX(s) Applied:...

  4. CX-012311: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Accelerator Test Facility II CX(s) Applied: B3.10 Date: 05/28/2014 Location(s): New York Offices(s): Brookhaven Site Office

  5. CX-008799: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Jack Case Showers Projects CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/04/2012 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Y-12 Site Office

  6. CX-010763: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CX-010763: Categorical Exclusion Determination Nevada Desert Research Institute- Photovoltaic Installation CX(s) Applied: B5.16 Date: 07172013 Location(s): Nevada Offices(s):...

  7. CX-003976: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CX-003976: Categorical Exclusion Determination Development of a High-Concentration Low-Cost Parabolic Trough System for Baseload Concentrated Solar Power Generation CX(s)...

  8. CX-012254: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hydro Research Foundation University Research Awards - Vanderbilt CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 05/28/2014 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  9. CX-012253: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hydro Research Foundation University Research Awards - OSU CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 05/27/2014 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  10. CX-004351: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    4351: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-004351: Categorical Exclusion Determination Center for Development of Math, Science and Technology CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 1029...

  11. CX-002671: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    1: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-002671: Categorical Exclusion Determination Vegetation Management - Routine Maintenance Along Captain Jack-Olinda Transmission Line CX(s)...

  12. CX-003959: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    59: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-003959: Categorical Exclusion Determination Federal Bureau of Investigation Radiological Dispersion Device Training CX(s) Applied: B1.2...

  13. CX-010689: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Generic CX Determination for Financial Assistance Awards CX(s) Applied: Unknown Date: 07/17/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Chicago Office

  14. CX-005987: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    87: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-005987: Categorical Exclusion Determination Stion Corporation - Superstrate Device for High Efficiency Tandem Modules CX(s) Applied: A9,...

  15. Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    (CX) Determinations By Date Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date August 25, 2015 CX-012469: Categorical Exclusion Determination Gas Analysis Services CX(s) Applied:...

  16. CX-100022: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CX-100022: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-100022: Categorical Exclusion Determination EERE Demonstration for Advanced Retro-Commissioning Technology CX(s) Applied: A9,...

  17. CX-001378: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    378: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-001378: Categorical Exclusion Determination Wackenhut Services, Incorporated Training Facility CX(s) Applied: B1.2 Date: 10282009...

  18. CX-012664: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    SBIR/STTR Phase 0 Outreach and Assistance Program CX(s) Applied: A8Date: 41844 Location(s): IllinoisOffices(s): Chicago Office

  19. CX-007826: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    007826: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-007826: Categorical Exclusion Determination "Crittenden City Facilities Re-Roofing CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 01312012 Location(s):...

  20. CX-012433: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Computer Simulation and Prototype Construction and Testing CX(s) Applied: A9Date: 41878 Location(s): GeorgiaOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  1. CX-000310: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    0: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-000310: Categorical Exclusion Determination New Jersey Revision 1 - Energy Efficiency Upgrades for State Buildings CX(s) Applied: A9, A11,...

  2. CX-009923: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CX-009923: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-009923: Categorical Exclusion Determination Project Icebreaker CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1 Date: 01072013 Location(s): Ohio...

  3. CX-007056: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    7056: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-007056: Categorical Exclusion Determination Interstate Electrification Improvement CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 09192011 Location(s):...

  4. CX-009411: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    411: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-009411: Categorical Exclusion Determination Routine Maintenance of Hesperus-Montrose 345 Kilovolt Transmission Line Access Roads CX(s)...

  5. CX-100290 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    0 Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-100290 Categorical Exclusion Determination Location, Location, Efficiency (Milwaukee, WI) Award Number: DE-EE0007069 CX(s) Applied: A9,...

  6. CX-003197: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    7: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-003197: Categorical Exclusion Determination Low Cost High Concentration Photovoltaic Systems for Utility Power Generation CX(s) Applied:...

  7. CX-007370: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    370: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-007370: Categorical Exclusion Determination Idaho-TRIBE-SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBE OF THE FORT HALL RESERVATION OF IDAHO CX(s) Applied:...

  8. CX-011234: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    34: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-011234: Categorical Exclusion Determination Construction and Maintenance Activities at Existing Field Offices and Operation Centers CX(s)...

  9. CX-008534: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Peter Wentz Geothermal CX(s) Applied: B5.19 Date: 05/23/2012 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  10. CX-008204: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Energize Missouri HUG Finch CX(s) Applied: B5.19 Date: 03/23/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  11. CX-008203: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Energize Missouri HUG Demoret CX(s) Applied: B5.19 Date: 03/23/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  12. CX-009442: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Cutters Grove, Anoka CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.19 Date: 07/31/2012 Location(s): Minnesota Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  13. CX-007836: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Building Retrofits CX(s) Applied: B5.19 Date: 01/30/2012 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  14. CX-008241: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Energize Missouri HUG Teter CX(s) Applied: B5.19 Date: 05/15/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  15. CX-008205: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Energize Missouri HUG Weaver CX(s) Applied: B5.19 Date: 03/23/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  16. CX-012097: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Microgrid Demonstration Project CX(s) Applied: B5.15 Date: 03/24/2014 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  17. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    2014 CX-012329: Categorical Exclusion Determination PNNL Projects Involving Small-Scale Research and Development, Laboratory Operations, and Pilot Projects in the 300 Area CX(s)...

  18. CX-002327: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Determination Central Facility Area and Advanced Test Reactor-Complex Analytical and Research and Development Laboratory Operation (Overarching) CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05...

  19. CX-005162: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    5162: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-005162: Categorical Exclusion Determination Green Chemistry - CEAM Phase 3 - Working Bug LLC CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 02082011...

  20. CX-008545: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Solar Energy Evolution and Diffusion Studies CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 06/19/2012 Location(s): CX: none Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  1. CX-012200: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Determination of Excess Real Property CX(s) Applied: B1.36 Date: 05/01/2014 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Legacy Management

  2. CX-100081: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Exclusion Determination CX-100081: Categorical Exclusion Determination Harnessing the Hydro-Electric Potential of Engineered Drops Award Number: DE-EE0005428 CX(s) Applied:...

  3. CX-012122: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    OCGen Module Mooring Project CX(s) Applied: B5.25 Date: 04/29/2014 Location(s): Maine Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  4. CX-006209: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Determination Missouri Independent Energy Efficiency Program: Anheuser-Busch - Brewery Energy Efficiency Retrofits CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 07012011 Location(s): Saitn...

  5. CX-010109: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    09: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-010109: Categorical Exclusion Determination Curecanti-Poncha 230 Kilovolt Transmission Line Cross Bar Ranch Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3...

  6. CX-008683: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Shaniko Radio Station Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 07/11/2012 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  7. CX-009698: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sale of Lakeside Radio Station CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 12/27/2012 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  8. CX-012231: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mica Peak Radio Station upgrade CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 06/09/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  9. CX-011190: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Alberton Communication Site Construction CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 08/26/2013 Location(s): Montana Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  10. CX-010155: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Augspurger Radio Tower Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 04/03/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  11. CX-100294 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    4 Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-100294 Categorical Exclusion Determination Texturizing Wind Turbine Towers to Reduce Bat Mortality Award Number: DE-EE0007033 CX(s)...

  12. CX-011401: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minto Lodge Rehabilitation CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 11/19/2013 Location(s): Alaska Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  13. CX-010237: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pittsburgh Green Innovators Synergy Center CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 02/28/2013 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  14. CX-008973: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Petrography Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/01/2012 Location(s): West Virginia Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  15. CX-010730: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Paisley Geothermal Integration CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 08/09/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  16. CX-008161: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Prosser Hatchery Backup Generator Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 04/16/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  17. CX-008700: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Natapoc Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 06/12/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  18. CX-012788: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bio-Aviation Fuel LCA with GREET CX(s) Applied: B5.15Date: 41906 Location(s): IllinoisOffices(s): Argonne Site Office

  19. CX-012718: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Idaho State University Reactor Laboratory Modernization CX(s) Applied: B1.31Date: 41844 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  20. CX-012189: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Microbial Laboratory Analysis CX(s) Applied: B3.12 Date: 05/06/2014 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Argonne Site Office

  1. CX-012317: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    High Performance Computing Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 06/16/2014 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  2. CX-012725: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Materials and Fuel Complex (MFC)-782 Fire Sprinkler Installation CX(s) Applied: B2.2Date: 41829 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  3. CX-010515: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Energy Efficiency Public Service Campaign CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 06/14/2013 Location(s): New York Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  4. CX-007856: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sacramento Regional Energy Alliance CX(s) Applied: B5.23 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  5. CX-007858: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Southwest Solar Transformation Initiative CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  6. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Western Area PowerAdministratio...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration-Upper Great Plains Region March 22, 2013 CX-010553: Categorical Exclusion Determination Appledorn Substation Construction CX(s)...

  7. CX-008250: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Geotechnical Core Drilling for USGS 138 CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 04/18/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  8. CX-003937: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-003937: Categorical Exclusion Determination Hawaii Energy Sustainability Program (Subtask 2.4.1: Evaluate Carbonized Biomass Samples) CX(s)...

  9. CX-012110: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Cowlitz Falls Fish Facility Access Agreement Extension CX(s) Applied: A2 Date: 04/02/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  10. CX-009398: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Domestic Source Recovery CX(s) Applied: B2.6 Date: 11/01/2012 Location(s): New Mexico Offices(s): Los Alamos Site Office

  11. CX-012705: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC)-703 Fire Alarm Replacement CX(s) Applied: B2.2Date: 41858 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  12. CX-011250: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Determination Transforming Photovoltaic Installations Toward Dispatchable, Schedulable Energy Solutions CX(s) Applied: B3.6, B5.15 Date: 10172013 Location(s): Oregon...

  13. CX-005950: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Determination Wisconsin Clean Transportation Partnership: Riteway Bus Services Propane Fueling Infrastructure CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 06012011 Location(s): Oak Creek,...

  14. CX-006893: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Exclusion Determination Ohio Advanced Transportation PartnershipFrito Lay Columbus Propane Fueling Infrastructure CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 09282011 Location(s): Columbus,...

  15. CX-008535: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    King County Biogas and Nutrient Reduction CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 05/22/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  16. CX-011110: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Advancements in Algal Biomass Yield CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/29/2013 Location(s): Hawaii Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  17. CX-010343: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bald Hill Farms Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 05/10/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  18. CX-011630: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    9831 Wall Construction Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/05/2013 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Y-12 Site Office

  19. CX-012816: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Rogue-Gold Beach Access Road Improvement CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41890 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  20. CX-011177: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hebo Substation Access Road Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 09/13/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  1. CX-011184: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Salmon Creek Pond Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 08/29/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  2. CX-008698: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Poorman Ponds Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 06/12/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  3. CX-009630: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    ICP Routine Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 11/06/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  4. CX-009632: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    INTEC – Suspect RH-TRU (AMWTP) CX(s) Applied: NO CX GIVEN Date: 11/23/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  5. CX-012722: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Test Reactor Area (TRA)-653 Conference Room Modifications CX(s) Applied: B1.15Date: 41829 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  6. CX-011564: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Excess Facilities Deactivation and Demolition CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 11/05/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  7. CX-009753: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Propane Corridor Development Program CX(s) Applied: B5.22 Date: 12/06/2012 Location(s): Georgia Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  8. CX-012482: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mid-Atlantic Regional Infrastructure Development Project CX(s) Applied: B5.22Date: 41862 Location(s): MarylandOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  9. CX-012002: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Raver-Covington Conductor Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 04/24/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  10. CX-010772: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Water Security Test Bed (WSTB) CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/17/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  11. CX-100159 Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Proposed Rulemaking for Energy Conservation Standards for Commercial and Industrial Pumps RIN: 1904-AC54 CX(s) Applied: B5.1

  12. CX-100160 Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Proposed Rulemaking for Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Dehumidifiers RIN: 1904-AC81 CX(s) Applied: B5.1

  13. CX-012706: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Radiochemistry Laboratory (RCL) Supply Intake Filter Housing CX(s) Applied: B2.5Date: 41858 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  14. CX-009295: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Energy Regional Innovation Cluster CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/05/2012 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  15. CX-003226: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Exclusion Determination Parris Island Wind Resource Assessment; National Renewable Energy Laboratory Tracking Number 10-032 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1 Date: 08042010...

  16. CX-010258: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bangladesh Meteorological Instrumentation Installation CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 04/26/2013 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  17. CX-008803: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Milling Machine Replacement Projects CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 05/14/2012 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Y-12 Site Office

  18. CX-002355: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-002355: Categorical Exclusion Determination Kansas City Power and Light (KCP&L) Green Impact Zone Smart Grid Demonstration CX(s) Applied:...

  19. CX-010113: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Compression Stress Relaxometer CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 03/28/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  20. CX-012434: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Low Cost Titanium Casting Technology CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41878 Location(s): OhioOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  1. CX-009587: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    City of Houston, Texas CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/12/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  2. CX-010261: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Nevada State Energy Program Formula CX(s) Applied: B5.16 Date: 04/26/2013 Location(s): Nevada Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  3. CX-009635: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    INTEC – U-233 Waste Stream Disposition CX(s) Applied: NO CX GIVEN Date: 12/15/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  4. CX-009019: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Determination CX-009019: Categorical Exclusion Determination "Catalyst-Assisted Manufacture of Olefins from Natural Gas Liquids: Prototype Development CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6...

  5. CX-011625: Categorical Exclusion Determinationc

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    9103 Second Floor Refurbishment CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/05/2013 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Y-12 Site Office

  6. CX-008609: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Vermont State Energy Program CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 07/03/2012 Location(s): Vermont Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  7. CX-012790: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Haystack Butte Radio Site Land Acquisition CX(s) Applied: B1.24Date: 41939 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  8. CX-004247: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Exclusion Determination CX-004247: Categorical Exclusion Determination Carolina Blue Skies Initiative CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1 Date: 10142010 Location(s): Indian Trail,...

  9. CX-012655: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Acquisition of Access Road Easements CX(s) Applied: B1.24Date: 41849 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  10. CX-012809: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    LURR 20140313 City of Vancouver Sewer Lateral CX(s) Applied: B4.9Date: 41906 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  11. CX-012651: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    LURR20140464 - Spencer May - Fence Construction CX(s) Applied: B4.9Date: 41858 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  12. CX-012632: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    LURR 20140456 - Salmon Creek Avenue Pathway Project CX(s) Applied: B4.9Date: 41885 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  13. CX-012808: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    LURR 20140504 Ross Substation Comcast Fiber Installation CX(s) Applied: B4.9Date: 41906 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  14. CX-012637: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    LURR 20140521 - David King - Sewer Line Installation CX(s) Applied: B4.9Date: 41876 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  15. CX-010398: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Power Line Configuration CX(s) Applied: B4.13 Date: 04/25/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  16. CX-010091: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Power Line Configuration 2013-1 CX(s) Applied: B4.13 Date: 04/15/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  17. CX-002194: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CX-002194: Categorical Exclusion Determination Install Demonstration Wind Turbine at Weldon Spring, Missouri, Site CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04282010 Location(s):...

  18. CX-012812: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Chemawa-Salem #1 & #2 Access Road Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41893 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  19. CX-012469: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Gas Analysis Services CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41876 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  20. CX-010656: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Stormwater Drainage Repair CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/18/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  1. CX-011995: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Exclusion Determination CX-011995: Categorical Exclusion Determination Hat Rock Tap Switching Station Equipment Transfer CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 04102014 Location(s):...

  2. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Western Area PowerAdministratio...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Mountain Region August 14, 2014 CX-012767: Categorical Exclusion Determination Medicine Bow Substation Control Building Installation Project Carbon County, Wyoming CX(s)...

  3. CX-005991: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CX-005991: Categorical Exclusion Determination Prairie Village, Kansas Ground Source Heat Pump Relocation CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05252011 Location(s): Prairie Village,...

  4. CX-012118: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Hydro Research Foundation University Research Awards - Tufts CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 05/21/2014 Location(s): Georgia Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  5. CX-010437: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Rocky Ridge Radio Station Upgrade CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 05/31/2013 Location(s): Montana Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  6. CX-011239: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Security Upgrades at Multiple Substations CX(s) Applied: ? Date: 10/02/2013 Location(s): Oregon, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  7. CX-012474: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Refractories/Ceramics Project CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41870 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  8. CX-007418: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sidewalks to School CX(s) Applied: B1.13 Date: 12/13/2011 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  9. CX-006211: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Exclusion Determination Missouri Independent Energy Efficiency Program: Henniges Automotive - Process Air Compressor Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 07182011 Location(s):...

  10. CX-009423: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Relay and Switchboard Panel Replacements CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 10/29/2012 Location(s): Arkansas Offices(s): Southwestern Power Administration

  11. CX-012310: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sawmill Creek Stream Bank Erosion CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/06/2014 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Argonne Site Office

  12. CX-009132: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Landfill Gas Utilization Plant CX(s) Applied: B5.21 Date: 08/02/2012 Location(s): New York Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  13. CX-012566: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Z-Area Fire Tank Painting CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41865 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  14. CX-009419: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Magnetic Pulser CX(s) Applied: None applied. Date: 10/30/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Kansas City Site Office

  15. CX-007893: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    SunShot Massachusetts CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 02/10/2012 Location(s): Massachusetts Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  16. CX-012463: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Reliable SOFC Systems CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6Date: 41877 Location(s): ConnecticutOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  17. CX-011626: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Line Yard Fence Project CX(s) Applied: B1.11 Date: 06/05/2013 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Y-12 Site Office

  18. CX-010869: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Nauticas Research Program CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/07/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Argonne Site Office

  19. CX-007407: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Advanced Floating Turbine CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 12/07/2011 Location(s): Ohio Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  20. CX-010768: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    ZIRCEX Nuclear Fuel Dissolution Testing CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/12/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  1. CX-012810: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    St. Johns-Keeler Minor Access Road Improvement CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41901 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  2. CX-009513: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Aquatic Invasive Mussels Monitoring CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 10/15/2012 Location(s): CX: none Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  3. CX-012658: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Chief Joseph and Custer Substations Security Fence Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.11Date: 41843 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  4. CX-007549: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Harrisonville - Waste Water Treatment Plant CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 01/10/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  5. CX-007550: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Kearney - Waste Water Treatment Plant CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 01/10/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  6. CX-007417: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Shift CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/21/2011 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  7. CX-010532: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Various Demolition Jobs CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 06/07/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Fermi Site Office

  8. CX-012796: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Big Eddy-Redmond #1 Wood Pole Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41919 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  9. CX-012818: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    La Pine-Chiloquin Wood Pole Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41887 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  10. CX-012813: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Redmond-Pilot Butte #1 Wood Pole Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41893 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  11. CX-012799: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Malin-Hilltop Wood Pole Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41915 Location(s): CaliforniaOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  12. CX-012805: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Brasada-Harney #1 Wood Pole Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41908 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  13. CX-012798: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Davis Creek Tap Wood Pole Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41915 Location(s): CaliforniaOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  14. CX-009166: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Integration of Waste Heat Recovery, Waste-to-Energy Conversion, and Waste-to-Chemical Conversion with Industrial Gas and Chemical Manufacturing Processes CX(s) Applied:...

  15. CX-011534: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Grays River Confluence Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 11/08/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  16. Chemical Engineering Journal 87 (2002) 101110 Co-treatment of H2S and toluene in a biotrickling filter

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    2002-01-01

    Chemical Engineering Journal 87 (2002) 101­110 Co-treatment of H2S and toluene in a biotrickling filter Huub H.J. Cox, Marc A. Deshusses Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University/hypochlorite or caustic/peroxide scrubbers. However, chemical scrubbers are expensive to operate and relatively

  17. Geothermal Development and the Use of Categorical Exclusions Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (Presentation)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Levine, A.; Young, K. R.

    2014-09-01

    The federal environmental review process under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) can be complex and time consuming. Currently, a geothermal developer may have to complete the NEPA process multiple times during the development of a geothermal project. One mechanism to reduce the timeframe of the federal environmental review process for activities that do not have a significant environmental impact is the use of Categorical Exclusions (CXs), which can exempt projects from having to complete an Environmental Assessment or Environmental Impact Statement. This study focuses primarily on the CX process and its applicability to geothermal exploration. In this paper, we: Provide generalized background information on CXs, including previous NEPA reports addressing CXs, the process for developing CXs, and the role of extraordinary circumstances; Examine the history of the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) geothermal CXs; Compare current CXs for oil, gas, and geothermal energy; Describe bills proposing new statutory CXs; Examine the possibility of standardizing geothermal CXs across federal agencies; and Present analysis from the Geothermal NEPA Database and other sources on the potential for new geothermal exploration CXs. As part of this study, we reviewed Environmental Assessments (EAs) conducted in response to 20 geothermal exploration drilling permit applications (Geothermal Drilling Permits or Notices of Intents) since the year 2001, the majority of which are from the last 5 years. All 20 EAs reviewed for this study resulted in a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). While many of these FONS's involved proponent proposed or federal agency required mitigation, this still suggests it may be appropriate to create or expand an exploration drilling CX for geothermal, which would have a significant impact on reducing geothermal exploration timelines and up-front costs. Ultimately, federal agencies tasked with permitting and completing environmental reviews for geothermal exploration drilling activities and/or legislative representatives are the responsible parties to discuss the merits and implementation of new or revised CXs for geothermal development.

  18. Geothermal Development and the Use of Categorical Exclusions (Poster)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Levine, A.; Young, K. R.

    2014-09-01

    The federal environmental review process under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) can be complex and time consuming. Currently, a geothermal developer may have to complete the NEPA process multiple times during the development of a geothermal project. One mechanism to reduce the timeframe of the federal environmental review process for activities that do not have a significant environmental impact is the use of Categorical Exclusions (CXs), which can exempt projects from having to complete an Environmental Assessment or Environmental Impact Statement. This study focuses primarily on the CX process and its applicability to geothermal exploration. In this paper, we Provide generalized background information on CXs, including previous NEPA reports addressing CXs, the process for developing CXs, and the role of extraordinary circumstances; Examine the history of the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) geothermal CXs;Compare current CXs for oil, gas, and geothermal energy; Describe bills proposing new statutory CXs; Examine the possibility of standardizing geothermal CXs across federal agencies; and Present analysis from the Geothermal NEPA Database and other sources on the potential for new geothermal exploration CXs. As part of this study, we reviewed Environmental Assessments (EAs) conducted in response to 20 geothermal exploration drilling permit applications (Geothermal Drilling Permits or Notices of Intents) since the year 2001, the majority of which are from the last 5 years. All 20 EAs reviewed for this study resulted in a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). While many of these FONSI's involved proponent proposed or federal agency required mitigation, this still suggests it may be appropriate to create or expand an exploration drilling CX for geothermal, which would have a significant impact on reducing geothermal exploration timelines and up-front costs. Ultimately, federal agencies tasked with permitting and completing environmental reviews for geothermal exploration drilling activities and/or legislative representatives are the responsible parties to discuss the merits and implementation of new or revised CXs for geothermal development.

  19. Particle deposition in ventilation ducts

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Sippola, Mark R.

    2002-01-01

    M. and Wang, D. (1999) Duct systems in large commercialin ventilation air supply ducts. Proceedings of Indoor Air ‘filtration efficiency of in-duct ventilation air cleaners.

  20. Acid rain control strategists overlook dust removal benefits

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1989-09-01

    Various strategies for controlling acid rain by reducing SO{sub 2} from existing utilities have failed to take into account the incidental particulate removal abilities of SO{sub 2} scrubbers. This has resulted in over-estimating the costs of acid rain control by 25% or more. This oversight has also caused utilities to invest in preliminary engineering of precipitator upgrades which will never have to be made if scrubbers are installed. While it seems inexplicable that a factor of this importance could have been overlooked by the industry, it is because of the unique situation in old U.S. utility power plants. These plants have relatively inefficient particulate control equipment which is not subject to new source performance standards. New power plants incorporate highly efficient particulate control devices so the ability of the downstream scrubbers to remove dust is irrelevant. The very small amount of particulate entering the scrubber from a highly efficient precipitator could be offset by escaping sulfate particles from a poorly operated scrubber. So an informal guideline was established to indicate that the scrubber had no overall effect on particulate emissions. The industry has generalized upon this guideline when, in fact, it only applies to new plants. The McIlvaine Company in its FGD Knowledge Network has thoroughly documented evidence that SO{sub 2} scrubbers will remove as much as 95% of the particulate being emitted from the relatively low efficiency precipitators operating on the nations existing coal-fired power plants.

  1. Dry effluent

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Brady, J.D. (Anderson, 2000 Inc., Peachtree City, GA (US))

    1988-01-01

    The available choices of pollution control systems depend on what is being burned and how stringent the regulations are. The common systems are gas cooling by a waste heat boiler or an air-air heat exchanger followed by fabric filtration or electrostatic precipitation for particulate removal; alkaline spray absorbers followed by fabric filters (dry scrubbers) for particulate and acid gas removal; wet scrubbers for simultaneous particulate and acid gas removal, and; the newest - spray evaporation, followed by wet scrubbing for particulate and acid gas removal. Each has advantages and each has disadvantages. This paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the spray evaporator and wet scrubber combination.

  2. Use of sulfide-containing liquors for removing mercury from flue gases

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Nolan, Paul S. (North Canton, OH); Downs, William (Alliance, OH); Bailey, Ralph T. (Uniontown, OH); Vecci, Stanley J. (Alliance, OH)

    2003-01-01

    A method and apparatus for reducing and removing mercury in industrial gases, such as a flue gas, produced by the combustion of fossil fuels, such as coal, adds sulfide ions to the flue gas as it passes through a scrubber. Ideally, the source of these sulfide ions may include at least one of: sulfidic waste water, kraft caustic liquor, kraft carbonate liquor, potassium sulfide, sodium sulfide, and thioacetamide. The sulfide ion source is introduced into the scrubbing liquor as an aqueous sulfide species. The scrubber may be either a wet or dry scrubber for flue gas desulfurization systems.

  3. Apparatus for control of mercury

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Downs, William (Alliance, OH); Bailey, Ralph T. (Uniontown, OH)

    2001-01-01

    A method and apparatus for reducing mercury in industrial gases such as the flue gas produced by the combustion of fossil fuels such as coal adds hydrogen sulfide to the flue gas in or just before a scrubber of the industrial process which contains the wet scrubber. The method and apparatus of the present invention is applicable to installations employing either wet or dry scrubber flue gas desulfurization systems. The present invention uses kraft green liquor as a source for hydrogen sulfide and/or the injection of mineral acids into the green liquor to release vaporous hydrogen sulfide in order to form mercury sulfide solids.

  4. Use of sulfide-containing liquors for removing mercury from flue gases

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Nolan, Paul S.; Downs, William; Bailey, Ralph T.; Vecci, Stanley J.

    2006-05-02

    A method and apparatus for reducing and removing mercury in industrial gases, such as a flue gas, produced by the combustion of fossil fuels, such as coal, adds sulfide ions to the flue gas as it passes through a scrubber. Ideally, the source of these sulfide ions may include at least one of: sulfidic waste water, kraft caustic liquor, kraft carbonate liquor, potassium sulfide, sodium sulfide, and thioacetamide. The sulfide ion source is introduced into the scrubbing liquor as an aqueous sulfide species. The scrubber may be either a wet or dry scrubber for flue gas desulfurization systems.

  5. Compliance testing of Grissom AFB Central Heating Plant coal-fired boilers 3, 4, and 5, Grissom AFB, Indiana. Final report, 29 January-15 February 1989

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Garrison, J.A.

    1989-06-01

    At the request of HQ, SAC/SGPB source compliance testing (particulate and visible emissions) of boilers 3, 4, and 5 in the Grissom AFB Central Heating Plant was accomplished 29 Jan-15 Feb 89. The survey was conducted to determine compliance with regards to Indiana Administrative Code, Title 325 - Air Pollution Control Board, Article 5, Opacity Regulations, and Article 6, Particulate Regulations. Boiler 3 was tested through scrubber B, Boiler 4 through scrubber A, and Boiler 5 through scrubber B and the bypass stack. Results indicate that each boiler met applicable visible and particulate emission standards.

  6. Duct injection technology prototype development: Nozzle development Subtask 4. 1, Atomizer specifications for duct injection technology

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1992-02-01

    Babcock Wilcox has conducted a program to identify atomizers appropriate for successful in-duct injection of humidification water and lime slurries. The purpose of this program was to identify and quantify atomizer spray and performance criteria that affect the operations and reliability of the in-duct SO{sub 2} removal process, and compare commercially available atomizers to these criteria.

  7. Duct injection technology prototype development: Nozzle development Subtask 4.1, Atomizer specifications for duct injection technology. Topical report 8

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1992-02-01

    Babcock & Wilcox has conducted a program to identify atomizers appropriate for successful in-duct injection of humidification water and lime slurries. The purpose of this program was to identify and quantify atomizer spray and performance criteria that affect the operations and reliability of the in-duct SO{sub 2} removal process, and compare commercially available atomizers to these criteria.

  8. Particle Emissions From Vehicles (SI-PFI and SI-DI) at High Speed and From Large Ocean-Going Vessels

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Espinoza, Carlos

    2014-01-01

    Engine on an Ocean-Going Vessel. Rep. N.p. : n.p. , 2009.from an Ocean-Going Vessel Equipped with a Scrubber 1.world by large ocean-going vessels (LOGVs). LOGVs represent

  9. Shut Down Fans, Save $1/4 Million/Yr and Increase Airflow? 

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Martin, V.; Ohrt, H.

    1998-01-01

    In 1994, the fume collection system for the Desulphurization Station at Dofasco Inc., Hamilton, Ontario was studied for energy and maintenance optimization. The existing system consisted of two 600 hp fans on a wet scrubber system for two collection...

  10. From presentation discussions Thursday, April 29, 2010 Why do environmental groups oppose mercury cap and trade schemes?

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Toohey, Darin W.

    -and-trade system is the best way to limit sulfur dioxide (acid rain) and greenhouse gases because they cap and trade schemes? Do particles cool or warm the climate? Haze and fires Sulfur scrubbers #12;EPA

  11. Post-combustion carbon dioxide capture using electrochemically mediated amine regeneration

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Stern, Michael C.

    Electrochemically mediated amine regeneration is a new post-combustion capture technology with the potential to exploit the excellent removal efficiencies of thermal amine scrubbers while reducing parasitic energy losses ...

  12. The Utilization and Recovery of Energy from Blast Furnaces and Converters 

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Hegemann, K. R.; Niess, T.; Baare, R. D.

    1979-01-01

    comprising a gas cleaning unit for dust removal and a turbine for converting the recoverable thermal energy into mechanical and electrical energy. The adjustable annular gap scrubber for separating fine dust also serves as an element for regulating the gas...

  13. Title: Using acidic electrolyzed water to reduce objectionable gas emissions from poultry production facilities in Texas.

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Mukhtar, Saqib

    Title: Using acidic electrolyzed water to reduce objectionable gas emissions from poultry. Another option that needs to be considered for use in wet scrubbers is acidic electrolyzed water (AEW

  14. The Effect of Simulated Barium Carbonate Waste Stream on the Hydration of Composite Cement Systems

    E-Print Network [OSTI]

    Sheffield, University of

    of spent uranium oxide fuel and passed through a caustic scrubber producing a sodium carbonate waste form. In the Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) at BNFL, Sellafield, CO2 is released during the dissolution

  15. CX-011559: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Safeguards in Pyroprocessing: an Integrated Model Development and Measurement Data Analysis CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/20/2013 Location(s): Ohio Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  16. CX-009264: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Controls on Methane Expulsion During Melting of Natural Gas Hydrate Systems CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/12/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  17. CX-008978: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Parking Garage Gutter Replacement and Installation of Roof Ice Melt System CX(s) Applied: B2.3, B2.5 Date: 08/01/2012 Location(s): West Virginia Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  18. CX-009266: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Controls on Methane Expulsion During Melting of Natural Gas Hydrate Systems CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 09/11/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  19. CX-100059 Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Pilot-Scale Mixotrophic Algae Integrated Biorefinery Award Number: DE-EE0006245 CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.15 Date: 09/15/2014 Location(s): IA Office(s): Golden Field Office

  20. CX-010749: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pilot-Scale Mixotrophic Algae Integrated Biorefinery CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.15 Date: 08/15/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  1. CX-010136: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Repair Sanitary Sewer Line South of 725-N CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/11/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  2. CX-008626: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace 607-6A Sanitary Sewer Lift Station CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/20/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  3. CX-010722: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Soos Creek Water & Sewer District Land Use Review Request Case No. 20120040 CX(s) Applied: B4.9 Date: 08/20/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  4. CX-010145: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    City of Sherwood Sewer Line Replacement Land Use Review Request CX(s) Applied: B4.9 Date: 04/25/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  5. CX-008721: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    City of Longview Pump Stations and Force Main Project CX(s) Applied: B4.9 Date: 05/15/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  6. CX-009096: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    U.S. Customs and Border Protection Non-Intrusive Inspection Tests CX(s) Applied: B3.10, B3.11 Date: 05/18/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Pacific Northwest Site Office

  7. CX-011483: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bioprocessing for Bioremediation and Energy Production CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/06/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  8. CX-010530: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Electro-Autotrophic Synthesis of Higher Alcohols CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/27/2012 Location(s): California, North Carolina, North Carolina Offices(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy

  9. CX-010264: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Synthetic Microorganisms to Enable Lignin to Fuel Conversion CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 04/15/2013 Location(s): Texas, Georgia, Washington Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  10. CX-007603: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ultra-Deepwater Resources to Reserves Development and Acceleration through Appraisal CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 01/20/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  11. CX-009022: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    A Novel Flash lronmaking Process CX(s) Applied: A9, B1.31, B3.6 Date: 08/22/2012 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  12. CX-008964: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ohio Advanced Transportation Partnership - Installation of Electric Vehicle Charging in Walgreens Parking Lot CX(s) Applied: B5.23 Date: 08/03/2012 Location(s): Ohio Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  13. CX-010870: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    New Advanced Photon Source Parking Lot on Kearney Road CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 07/12/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Argonne Site Office

  14. CX-008509: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ohio Advanced Transportation Partnership - Electrical Vehicle Supply Equipment Installation in Walgreens Parking Lot CX(s) Applied: B5.23 Date: 07/16/2012 Location(s): Ohio Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  15. CX-008336: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pad 90 Overflow Parking Lot Project CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 05/01/2012 Location(s): New York Offices(s): Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program

  16. CX-008457: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ohio Advanced Transportation Partnership - Electrical Vehicle Supply Equipment Installation in Walgreens Parking Lot CX(s) Applied: B5.23 Date: 06/15/2012 Location(s): Ohio Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  17. CX-009246: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Naval Reactors Facility Parking Lot Expansion General Plant Project CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 06/20/2012 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program, NRF

  18. CX-008819: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Naval Reactors Facility Parking Lot Expansion General Plant Project CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 06/20/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program, Naval Reactors

  19. CX-009919: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Borough of Fort Lee, New Jersey Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 01/31/2013 Location(s): New Jersey Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  20. CX-012786: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Methods to Measure, Predict, and Relate Friction, Wear, and Fuel Economy CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41906 Location(s): IllinoisOffices(s): Argonne Site Office

  1. CX-009628: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bronze Preparation for Zinc Sequestration CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 10/18/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  2. CX-008665: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Zinc Traping Efficiency Testing CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/02/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  3. CX-010304: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Zinc Trapping Efficiency Testing CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04/30/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  4. CX-009912: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Refinery Upgrading of Hydropyrolysis Oil from Biomass CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 01/07/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  5. CX-011128: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Novel Electro-Deoxygenation Process for Bio-oil Upgrading CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.15 Date: 08/26/2013 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  6. CX-011737: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Gas Technology Institute - Dual Electrolyte Extraction Electro-Refinery for Aluminum Production CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 10/23/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy

  7. CX-012432: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Advanced Truck and Bus Radial Materials for Fuel-Efficiency CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41878 Location(s): PennsylvaniaOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  8. CX-012714: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometer for Nuclear Energy-Related Teaching and Research - Washington State University CX(s) Applied: B1.31Date: 41849 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  9. CX-007463: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ohio Advanced Transportation Partnership/City of Columbus Electric Vehicle Charging Equipment Installation CX(s) Applied: B5.23 Date: 12/20/2011 Location(s): Ohio Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  10. CX-000873: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Clean, Inspect, and Repair BMT-27CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 02/11/2010Location(s): TexasOffice(s): Fossil Energy, Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  11. CX-100156 Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Final Rule for Energy Conservation Standards for Automatic Commercial Ice Makers RIN: 1904-AC39 CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/29/2014 Location(s): Nationwide Office(s): Golden Field Office

  12. CX-008235: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Harnessing the Hydro-Electric Potential of Engineered Drops in the Columbia Basin Project: Phase 1 CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 04/18/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  13. CX-011410: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Scalable Low-head Axial-type Venturi-flow Energy Scavenger CX(s) Applied: B5.24 Date: 11/05/2013 Location(s): New Mexico Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  14. CX-007543: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Laboratory Demonstration of a New American Low-Head Hydropower Turbine CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/17/2012 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  15. CX-011553: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Recovery of Uranium from Seawater: Polymer-Supported Aminophosphinates as Selective CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/25/2013 Location(s): New York Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  16. CX-008817: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Indoor Bench Scale Research Projects and Conventional Laboratory Operations CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/08/2012 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): New Brunswick Laboratory

  17. CX-011571: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Development of Novel Porous Sorbents for Extraction of Uranium from Seawater CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/14/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  18. CX-008809: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Wind Energy Installations- Wind Turbine Project (ASO-CX-293) CX(s) Applied: B5.18 Date: 05/22/2012 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Argonne Site Office

  19. CX-005753: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 05042011 Location(s): New Mexico Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office The State of New Mexico...

  20. CX-011702: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Novel Geothermal Development of Deep Sedimentary Systems in the United States CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 01/02/2014 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  1. CX-012427: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Alaska Hydrate Production Testing: Test Site Selection and Characterization CX(s) Applied: A1, A9Date: 41879 Location(s): ColoradoOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  2. CX-100005: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Community Crowd Funded Solar Development Award Number: DE-EE0006700 CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Solar Energy Technologies Date: 08/27/2014 Location(s): California Office(s): Golden Field Office

  3. CX-012479: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Assessing the Geochemical Response of CO2 Disposal in Flood Basalt Reservoirs CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41862 Location(s): IllinoisOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  4. CX-012481: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Assessing the Geochemical Response of CO2 Disposal in Flood Basalt Reservoirs CX(s) Applied: B3.1, B3.6Date: 41862 Location(s): CaliforniaOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  5. CX-010562: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pratt and Whitney Rocketdyne - Continuous Detonation Engine Combustor for Natural Gas Turbine CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/09/2013 Location(s): California, Connecticut Offices(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy

  6. CX-011272: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    “Nanite” For Better Well-Bore Integrity and Zonal Isolation CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/27/2013 Location(s): Hawaii Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  7. CX-011616: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Gore Pass-Kremmling 138-kilovolt Transmission Line Danger Tree Management CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 11/21/2013 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration-Rocky Mountain Region

  8. CX-011618: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Kremmling-Windy Gap 138-kilovolt Transmission Line Danger Tree Management CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 11/21/2013 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration-Rocky Mountain Region

  9. CX-011619: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Muddy Pass-Walden 69-kilovolt Transmission Line Danger Tree Management CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 11/21/2013 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration-Rocky Mountain Region

  10. CX-009172: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    California-City-Buena Park CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 09/04/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  11. CX-012020: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Connectivity Between Fractures and Pores in Hydrocarbon-Rich Mudrocks CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 04/29/2014 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  12. CX-100114 Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    North Carolina State University Award Number: DE-EE0006521 CX(s) Applied: A9, B1.31, B3.6 Date: 11/14/2014 Location(s): NC Office(s): Golden Field Office

  13. CX-010698: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Modeling and Validation of Sodium Plugging for Heat Exchangers in Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor Systems CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/11/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  14. CX-011546: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Optical Fiber A Pebble-Bed Breed and Burn Reactor Temperatures CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/27/2013 Location(s): California Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  15. CX-009798: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Foreign Location Source Recovery - Fiscal Year 2013 CX(s) Applied: B2.6 Date: 11/30/2012 Location(s): New Mexico Offices(s): Los Alamos Site Office

  16. CX-009524: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Foreign Location Source Recovery - Fiscal Year 2013 CX(s) Applied: B2.6 Date: 11/30/2012 Location(s): New Mexico Offices(s): Los Alamos Site Office

  17. CX-008858: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Siting, Modifying and Operating Support Buildings CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 08/01/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  18. CX-000677: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Crump Geyser Topic 1CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1Date: 02/08/2010Location(s): Warner Valley, OregonOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

  19. CX-010018: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    2H Evaporator Scale Sample Analysis CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/28/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  20. CX-008678: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hot Springs Substation Gravity Drain Install CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 07/19/2012 Location(s): Montana Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  1. CX-010522: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Gravity head Energy System (GHES) CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 06/14/2013 Location(s): Vermont, Texas Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  2. CX-009061: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Analytical Development Wet Chemistry Methods CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/24/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  3. CX-010650: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Raman Spectroscopy to Analyze Sludge, Saltcake, Supernate, Organics, and Inorganics CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/26/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  4. CX-010214: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Maximizing Multi-enzyme Synergy in Biomass Degradation in Yeast CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 02/28/2013 Location(s): California Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  5. CX-009105: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    284-H Track Coal Hopper Pit Modifications CX(s) Applied: B1.28 Date: 08/29/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  6. CX-009093: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Knolls Laboratory Q14 Sprinkler System Upgrade Project CX(s) Applied: B1.15, B2.2 Date: 08/03/2012 Location(s): New York Offices(s): Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program

  7. CX-008620: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    F-Tank Farm Sump Pump and Discharge Piping CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/22/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  8. CX-005280: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Demolition of Buildings 11-10 and 11-30CX(s) Applied: B1.23Date: 02/14/2011Location(s): Amarillo, TexasOffice(s): NNSA-Headquarters, Pantex Site Office

  9. CX-011512: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    108-1K Basement Sump Pump Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 10/16/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  10. CX-008863: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dredging of the West Hackberry Raw Water Intake Structure CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/14/2012 Location(s): Louisiana Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  11. CX-012625: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Building Water Removal from 216-C To Sanitary Sewer Lift Station CX(s) Applied: B1.28Date: 41793 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  12. CX-009893: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    25A2034 - Lightweight Thermal Energy Recovery (LighTER) System CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/15/2009 Location(s): Michigan, California Offices(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy

  13. CX-008995: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CX-008995: Categorical Exclusion Determination "Development of Integrated Die Casting Process For Large Thin-Wall Magnesium Applications CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 08...

  14. CX-010278: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Collaborative Industry-Academic Synchrophasor Engineering Program CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 05/17/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  15. CX-010279: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Clemson University's Synchrophasor Education Engineering Program CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 05/17/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  16. CX-010735: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Grand Coulee-Bell No.5 Dead End Insulator Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/19/2013 Location(s): Washington, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  17. CX-012493: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Geophysical and Mineralogical Controls on the Rheology of Fracture Slip… CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41855 Location(s): PennsylvaniaOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  18. CX-011295: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Material Dynamics and Kinetics Lab CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 10/17/2013 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  19. CX-012497: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Geophysical and Mineralogical Controls on the Rheology of Fracture Slip... CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41852 Location(s): New JerseyOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  20. CX-006545: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Fiber Optic Service Expansion: Building 59 to Building 84CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B1.15Date: 08/19/2011Location(s): Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaOffice(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  1. CX-009345: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Intrinsic Fiber Optic Chemical Sensors for Subsurface Detection of carbon dioxide CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/21/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  2. CX-010891: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Archer-Stegall 230-Kilovolt Fiber Optic Ground Wire Addition CX(s) Applied: B4.7 Date: 08/20/2013 Location(s): Nebraska, Nebraska Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration-Rocky Mountain Region

  3. CX-009344: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Intrinsic Fiber Optic Chemical Sensors for Subsurface Detection of carbon dioxide CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/21/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  4. CX-009343: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Intrinsic Fiber Optic Chemical Sensors for Subsurface Detection of carbon dioxide CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/21/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  5. CX-008981: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    A Small Particle Solar Receiver for High Temperature Brayton Power Cycles CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/21/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  6. CX-008947: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Novel Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Power Cycle Utilizing Pressurized Oxy-Combustion in Conjunction… CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/15/2012 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  7. CX-008946: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Novel Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Power Cycle Utilizing Pressurized Oxy-Combustion in Conjunction… CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/15/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  8. CX-100121 Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Biodiversity Research Institute Award Number: DE-EE0006803 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 12/01/20147 Location(s): ME Office(s): Golden Field Office

  9. CX-006593: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Vermont Biofuels Initiative: Renewable Energy Resources CDP-09CX(s) Applied: B5.1Date: 08/29/2011Location(s): Bennington, VermontOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

  10. CX-010517: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    State Energy Program- Lime Lakes Energy, LLC CX(s) Applied: B5.20 Date: 06/14/2013 Location(s): Ohio Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  11. CX-009597: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    288-F Ash Basin Landfill Closure CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 12/18/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  12. CX-012723: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Remote Closure Switch for Test Reactor Area (TRA)-786 Output Breaker CX(s) Applied: B2.5Date: 41827 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  13. CX-012588: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Obtain Samples for Potential D-Area Borrow Sources (Revision 1: Develop Borrow Pit 6 and Haul Roads) CX(s) Applied: B6.1Date: 41835 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  14. CX-010356: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Site Characterization Investigation and Environmental Monitoring Activities CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 11/19/2012 Location(s): Tennessee, California, Virginia Offices(s): Berkeley Site Office

  15. CX-007540: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Spectral Signal Processing: A New Approach to Mapping Reservoir Flow and Permeability CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1 Date: 01/19/2012 Location(s): Hawaii Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  16. CX-011255: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Time-lapse Joint Inversion of Geophysical Data and its Application to Geothermal Prospecting CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1 Date: 09/30/2013 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  17. CX-007814: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Big Hill Vacuum Truck CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 01/17/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  18. CX-011343: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Vacuum System Testing for 235-F Risk Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/17/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  19. CX-007934: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ultra High Vacuum Materials Chemistry Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 02/22/2012 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  20. CX-012315: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Advanced Test Reactor Primary Coolant Pump Motor Starters Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 06/24/2014 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  1. CX-012263: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Geomechanics Investigation of Carbon Dioxide Reservoir Seals CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 07/02/2014 Location(s): New Mexico Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  2. CX-012260: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Geomechanics investigation of Carbon Dioxide Reservoir Seals CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/02/2014 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  3. CX-012264: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Geomechanics Investigation of Carbon Dioxide Reservoir Seals CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/02/2014 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  4. CX-012538: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    A Coupled Geomechanical, Acoustic, Transport and Sorption Study of Caprick Integrity in CO2 Seq. CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6Date: 41836 Location(s): New MexicoOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  5. CX-012542: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Geomechanical Framework for CO2 Storage in Fractured Reservoirs and Caprocks for Sedimentary Basins CX(s) Applied: A1, A9Date: 41834 Location(s): OhioOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  6. CX-012271: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Quantitative Characterization of Impacts of Couple Geomechanics and Flow - Lab Experiments/Modeling CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/25/2014 Location(s): California Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  7. CX-012537: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    A Coupled Geomechanical, Acoustic, Transport and Sorption Study of Caprick Integrity in CO2 Seq. CX(s) Applied: A1, A9Date: 41836 Location(s): ColoradoOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  8. CX-012484: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Geomechanical Properties of Mesozoic Rift Basins: Applications for Geosequestration CX(s) Applied: B3.1Date: 41858 Location(s): New YorkOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  9. CX-012270: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Quantitative Characterization of Impacts of Couple Geomechanics and Flow - Lab Experiments/Modeling CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/25/2014 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  10. CX-011455: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Vortex Induced Vibration Study for Deep Draft Column Stabilized Floaters CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 11/05/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  11. CX-011457: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Vortex Induced Vibration Study for Deep Draft Column Stabilized Floaters CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 11/05/2013 Location(s): California Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  12. CX-010022: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Stiffen Canyon Exhaust Fan 3 Motor Pedestal CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 01/28/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  13. CX-010542: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace Obsolete West Hackberry Raw Water Injection Pump Vibration Transmitters CX(s) Applied: B5.2 Date: 06/24/2013 Location(s): Louisiana Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  14. CX-012286: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Marine Vibrator Prototype Demonstration Test CX(s) Applied: A1, A8, A9, A11, B3.11 Date: 06/12/2014 Location(s): CX: none Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  15. CX-011454: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Vortex Induced Vibration Study for Deep Draft Column Stabilized Floaters CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 11/05/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  16. CX-011456: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Vortex Induced Vibration Study for Deep Draft Column Stabilized Floaters CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 11/05/2013 Location(s): New Mexico Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  17. CX-011201: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Adams Tap Motor-Operator Interrupters and Control Building Replacement CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 09/11/2013 Location(s): Arizona Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration-Desert Southwest Region

  18. CX-007433: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington State Ferries Biodiesel Project· Phase II CX(s) Applied: B5.22 Date: 12/07/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  19. CX-012207: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Design of SC Walls and Slabs for Impulsive Loading - Purdue University CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/05/2014 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  20. CX-011540: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Crooked Creek 3 and Deep River Mouth 2 Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 12/18/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  1. CX-012667: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Accelerator Division Cryogenic Department Engineering Office and Meson West 9 Work Activity CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41828 Location(s): IllinoisOffices(s): Fermi Site Office

  2. CX-008172: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    High-Pressure Crogenic Pump and Hydrogen Filling Station CX(s) Applied: B5.15 Date: 05/14/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): Lawrence Livermore Site Office

  3. CX-010693: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CX-010693: Categorical Exclusion Determination Conversion of Waste Carbon Dioxide and Shale Gas to High Value Chemicals CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 07012013 Location(s): New...

  4. CX-010216: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Design and Optimization of a Biochemical Production Platform with Biosensor-guided Synthetic Evolution CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 02/28/2013 Location(s): California Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  5. CX-008979: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Flexible Assembly Solar Technology CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6, B5.17 Date: 08/22/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  6. CX-008218: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    A System Design Study for Wilmington Canyon Offshore Wind Farm CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 04/02/2012 Location(s): Delaware Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  7. CX-006661: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Repair Flowline at 83-AX-4CX(s) Applied: B5.2, B5.4Date: 02/24/2010Location(s): Casper, WyomingOffice(s): RMOTC

  8. CX-006650: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Culvert Replacement Near 81-66-SX-15CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 10/26/2009Location(s): Casper, WyomingOffice(s): RMOTC

  9. CX-006665: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Restoration of 62-42-SX-10CX(s) Applied: B6.1Date: 03/03/2010Location(s): Casper, WyomingOffice(s): RMOTC

  10. CX-006656: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Restoration of 77-13-SX-3CX(s) Applied: B6.1Date: 01/00/1900Location(s): Casper, WyomingOffice(s): RMOTC

  11. CX-006663: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Restoration of 72-12-SX-10CX(s) Applied: B6.1Date: 03/03/2010Location(s): Casper, WyomingOffice(s): RMOTC

  12. CX-008145: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Reclamation of Decommissioned Batteries, Test Satellites, and Facilities CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B6.1 Date: 08/06/2011 Location(s): Wyoming Offices(s): RMOTC

  13. CX-011088: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    High Power Laser Tool and System for Unique Geothermal Well Completions CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 09/04/2013 Location(s): Colorado, Texas Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  14. CX-011143: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace River Water Pelton Valves and Remove Existing Valve Houses CX(s) Applied: B1.3. Date: 08/21/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  15. CX-011225: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    West Hackberry RWIS Recycle Valve Upgrade CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 10/15/2013 Location(s): Louisiana Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  16. CX-008513: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hydrate Growth Modeling in the Laboratory CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6 Date: 07/13/2012 Location(s): Oklahoma Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  17. CX-008512: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hydrate Growth Modeling in the Laboratory CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 07/13/2012 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  18. CX-008493: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Liquid Carbon Dioxide Slurry for Feeding Low Rank Coal (LRC) Gasifiers CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 07/23/2012 Location(s): Texas, Oklahoma Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  19. CX-009392: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Clean Cities Refueling Infrastructure for Alternative Fuels - Phase Three CX(s) Applied: B5.22 Date: 09/12/2012 Location(s): Oklahoma Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  20. CX-009391: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Clean Cities Refueling Infrastructure for Alternative Fuels (Revised Phase 2) CX(s) Applied: B5.22 Date: 09/12/2012 Location(s): Oklahoma Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  1. CX-012125: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pressure Prediction and Hazard Avoidance Through Improved Seismic Imaging CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11 Date: 05/29/2014 Location(s): Oklahoma Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  2. CX-012147: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ion Advanced Solvent Carbon Dioxide Capture Pilot Project (Budget Period 1) CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 05/21/2014 Location(s): Oklahoma Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  3. CX-010281: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Low Temperature Nitrous Oxide Storage and Reduction Using Engineered Materials CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 05/14/2013 Location(s): Kentucky Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  4. CX-012190: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Murray, Snohomish, and Sno-King Substations Equipment Acquisition CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 05/21/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  5. CX-012644: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Puget Sound Area Northern Intertie (PSANI) - Covington and Raver Substation Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B1.24, B4.11Date: 41864 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  6. CX-009609: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Push Pole Replacement in D-Area CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 11/27/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  7. CX-011039: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Friction Stir Scribe Joining of Al to AHSS CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/10/2013 Location(s): Minnesota Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  8. CX-011040: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Friction Stir Scribe Joining of Al to AHSS CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 09/10/2013 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  9. CX-011038: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Friction Stir Scribe Joining of Al to AHSS CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/10/2013 Location(s): Michigan Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  10. CX-012627: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Vacuum System Testing for 235-F Risk Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41793 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  11. CX-010282: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Low Temperature Nitrous Oxide Storage and Reduction Using Engineered Materials CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/14/2013 Location(s): New Jersey Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  12. CX-011795: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ultra Efficient CHHP using High Temperature Fuel Cell CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 02/06/2014 Location(s): Connecticut Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  13. CX-009143: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Development of High Operating Temperature Heat Transfer Fluids for Solar Thermal Power Generation CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 09/07/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  14. CX-100053: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Distribution grid analytic platform for automated DG interconnection analysis and grid optimization Award Number: DE-EE0006688 CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 09/11/2014 Location(s): Multiple Office(s): Golden Field Office

  15. CX-008492: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Carbon Dioxide Capture from Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Gas Streams Using the Ammonium Carbonate-Ammonium Bicarbonate Process CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 07/23/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  16. CX-007678: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Construction of Interagency Fire Center at TA-49 CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 01/17/2012 Location(s): New Mexico Offices(s): Los Alamos Site Office

  17. CX-008381: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Big Thompson to Flatiron 13.8 Kilovolt Transmission Line Structure Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 05/09/2012 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration-Rocky Mountain Region

  18. CX-010105: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Urban Transmission Line Danger Tree Management CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/26/2013 Location(s): Colorado, Colorado, Colorado, Colorado, Wyoming Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration-Rocky Mountain Region

  19. CX-008377: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Alcova-Casper North 115 Kilovolt Transmission Line Pole Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 04/10/2012 Location(s): Wyoming Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration-Rocky Mountain Region

  20. CX-008289: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Scale-Up of Hydrogen Transport Membranes CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 05/01/2012 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  1. CX-008311: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Scale-Up of Hydrogen Transport Membranes CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04/24/2012 Location(s): Kansas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  2. CX-008944: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mechanistic Enhancement of SOFC Cathode Durability CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/16/2012 Location(s): Maryland Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  3. CX-011063: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    SOFC Systems with Improved Reliability and Endurance CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B3.6 Date: 08/29/2013 Location(s): CX: none Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  4. CX-011062: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    SOFC Systems with Improved Reliability and Endurance CX(s) Applied: A1, A9 Date: 08/29/2013 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  5. CX-008359: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dismantling of 735-A and 735-11A Chillers and Condensers CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 04/17/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  6. CX-009106: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dismantle/Remove Vacuum System and Related Equipment in 772-F CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/29/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  7. CX-010854: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    906-T Air Stripper Dismantle and Removal CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 07/18/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  8. CX-009114: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dismantle and Remove Area Radiation Monitors (General) CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 08/23/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  9. CX-009078: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dismantle and removal (D&R) of Domestic Water (DW) & Process Water (PWS) heater tanks CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/11/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  10. CX-010318: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Tank 13 Dismantle and Remove (D&R) Equipment - General CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 04/22/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  11. CX-009062: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dismantle and Remove Low Level Waste Loading Station, Building 735-A CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 07/24/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  12. CX-008195: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minnesota City-Apple Valley CX(s) Applied: B1.32, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 04/10/2012 Location(s): Minnesota Offices(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  13. CX-008467: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Smart Grid Data Access Utilizing Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education as a Catalyst - Phase 1 CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 06/12/2012 Location(s): Maine Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  14. CX-009901: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    25A1152 - 1366 Direct Water: Enabling Terawatt Photovoltaics CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/18/2009 Location(s): Massachusetts Offices(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy

  15. CX-011109: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Overcoming the Fundamental Bottlenecks to a New World-Record Silicon Solar Cell CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/09/2013 Location(s): Georgia Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  16. CX-011563: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Multiphase Nanocrystalline Ceramic Concept for Nuclear Fuel CX(s) Applied: B3.15 Date: 11/19/2013 Location(s): California Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  17. CX-008339: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Prototype Staff Building 114 CX(s) Applied: B1.15, B1.16, B1.23 Date: 04/20/2012 Location(s): New York Offices(s): Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program

  18. CX-011832: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    McNary Substation Equipment Acquisition CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 01/29/2014 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  19. CX-009789: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Coulee-Westside Transfer Trip Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 02/06/2013 Location(s): Washington, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  20. CX-010774: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Iona Relay Station Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B1.11, B2.5 Date: 07/25/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  1. CX-012081: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Kimball Substation KY1A Transformer Replacement and Road Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 02/10/2014 Location(s): Nebraska Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration-Rocky Mountain Region

  2. CX-011731: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    University of Utah - Electromagnetic Sorting of Light Metals and Alloys CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/12/2013 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy

  3. CX-011404: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Marine and Hydrokinetic Environmental Effects Assessment and Monitoring CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 11/14/2013 Location(s): California, Hawaii Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  4. CX-011060: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Deep Controlled Source Electromagnetic Sensing: A Cost Effective, Long-Term Tool for Sequestration Monitoring CX(s) Applied: A1, A9 Date: 08/29/2013 Location(s): California Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  5. CX-012825: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Borehole-Deployed Electric Field Sources and Sensors for Permanent Monitoring of Carbon Dioxide Sequestration CX(s) Applied: B3.1, B3.6Date: 41905 Location(s): IllinoisOffices(s): Chicago Office

  6. CX-012225: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    PAC-CAISO Energy Imbalance Market Agreement CX(s) Applied: B4.8 Date: 06/24/2014 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  7. CX-007768: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    General Infrastructure to Enhance Nuclear Materials Research and Education at the University of Nevada, Reno CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/28/2011 Location(s): Nevada Offices(s): Nuclear Energy, Idaho Operations Office

  8. CX-010466: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Materials Synthesis and Electrochemistry Lab CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/03/2013 Location(s): West Virginia Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  9. CX-007365: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Integration of the Green Lane Energy Biogas Generator CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 11/17/2011 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  10. CX-011183: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Line Upgrade on Bonneville Power Administration’s Walla Walla-Pendleton Number 1 Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/30/2013 Location(s): Washington, Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  11. CX-011695: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Small Magnet Prototype and Research and Development CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 12/10/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Fermi Site Office

  12. CX-009897: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    25A1543 - A Genetically Tractable Microalgal Platform for Advanced Biofuel Production CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/19/2010 Location(s): Iowa Offices(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy

  13. CX-011779: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ohio Advanced Transportation Partnership - Conversion of Vehicles to Propane CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 02/20/2014 Location(s): Ohio Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  14. CX-100054 Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Development of On-Site Tapered Spiral Welding for Large Turbine Towers Award Number: DE-EE0006736 CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 09/09/2014 Location(s): MA Office(s): Golden Field Office

  15. CX-009032: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Monitoring and Control of the Hybrid Laser-Gas Metal Arc Welding Process – Idaho National Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/13/2011 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  16. CX-011590: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Fundamental Understanding of Creep Fatigue Interactions in 9Cr1MoVSteel Welds CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/04/2013 Location(s): Ohio Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  17. CX-012562: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Weld Actuator Crankarm to Input Shaft for RREX Fan Discharge Dampers CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41871 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  18. CX-010322: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Research and Development Welding and Brazing Sample Preparation and Activities in Building 723-A CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04/16/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  19. CX-009905: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    25A1001 - Advanced Semiconductor Materials for High Efficiency Thermoelectric Devices CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/01/2009 Location(s): California, North Carolina, Oklahoma Offices(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy

  20. CX-012108: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Telephone Line Removal Along the Access Road into Wautoma Substation CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/17/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration