National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for in-duct scrubber cxs

  1. Supporting Calculations For Submerged Bed Scrubber Condensate Disposal Preconceptual Study

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Pajunen, A. J.; Tedeschi, A. R.

    2012-09-18

    This document provides supporting calculations for the preparation of the Submerged Bed Scrubber Condensate Disposal Preconceptual Study report The supporting calculations include equipment sizing, Hazard Category determination, and LAW Melter Decontamination Factor Adjustments.

  2. Minimizing Energy Losses in Ducts | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Minimizing Energy Losses in Ducts Minimizing Energy Losses in Ducts Placing ductwork in conditioned space can help reduce energy losses. | Photo courtesy of ©iStockphoto/SimplyCreativePhotography Placing ductwork in conditioned space can help reduce energy losses. | Photo courtesy of ©iStockphoto/SimplyCreativePhotography In new home construction or in retrofits, proper duct system design is critical. In recent years, energy-saving designs have sought to include ducts and heating systems in

  3. Study of in-duct spray drying using condensation aerosol

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Chen, W.J.R.; Chang, S.M.; Adikesavalu, R. )

    1992-06-01

    Sulfur removal efficiency of in-duct spray drying is limited by sorbent content and surface properties of the sorbent-water aerosol. It was the purpose of this study to improve the sulfur removal efficiency for in-duct spray drying by injecting condensation aerosol instead of conventional dispersion aerosol. The program was composed of three phases. In Phase I, a novel pulsed fluid bed feeder was developed and was used to feed hydrated lime for subsequent experiments. A small condensation aerosol generator was then built, which produces a lime-water condensation aerosol by condensing steam on lime particles. The results show that novel lime-water aerosols less than 10 microns were generated. The central task in Phase II was to simulate experimentally in-duct spray drying using condensation aerosols and compare the results with those using dispersion aerosols reported in the literature. A small entrained-flow reactor was constructed to simulate an in-duct spray dryer. The condensation aerosol was then introduced to the reactor at various approach to saturation temperature, calcium/sulfur stoichiometry and sulfur dioxide concentration for desulfurization study. The results show that we have improved the sulfur removal efficiency for in-duct spray drying to 90 percent or above. Thus we have met and exceeded the stated project goal of 70 percent sulfur removal. A comprehensive computer code was employed to calculate sulfur removal efficiency in Phase III.

  4. Mercury removal in utility wet scrubber using a chelating agent

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Amrhein, Gerald T. (Louisville, OH)

    2001-01-01

    A method for capturing and reducing the mercury content of an industrial flue gas such as that produced in the combustion of a fossil fuel or solid waste adds a chelating agent, such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or other similar compounds like HEDTA, DTPA and/or NTA, to the flue gas being scrubbed in a wet scrubber used in the industrial process. The chelating agent prevents the reduction of oxidized mercury to elemental mercury, thereby increasing the mercury removal efficiency of the wet scrubber. Exemplary tests on inlet and outlet mercury concentration in an industrial flue gas were performed without and with EDTA addition. Without EDTA, mercury removal totaled 42%. With EDTA, mercury removal increased to 71%. The invention may be readily adapted to known wet scrubber systems and it specifically provides for the removal of unwanted mercury both by supplying S.sup.2- ions to convert Hg.sup.2+ ions into mercuric sulfide (HgS) and by supplying a chelating agent to sequester other ions, including but not limited to Fe.sup.2+ ions, which could otherwise induce the unwanted reduction of Hg.sup.2+ to the form, Hg.sup.0.

  5. Cross-flow versus counter-current flow packed-bed scrubbers: a mathematical analysis

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Fthenakis, V.M.

    1996-02-01

    Little is known about the mass transfer properties of packing media exposed to a crossflow of gas and liquid, whereas there is abundant information related to counter-current scrubbers. This paper presents a theoretical analysis of mass transfer and hydrodynamics in cross- flow packed bed scrubbers and compares those with information available for counter current towers, so that the first can be evaluated and/or designed based on data derived for the second. Mathematical models of mass transfer in cross-flow and counter- current packed bed scrubbers are presented. From those, one can predict the removal effectiveness of a crossflow scrubber from the number of transfer units (NTU) calculated for a similar counterflow operation; alternatively, when the removal effectiveness in counterflow is known, one can predict the corresponding NTU in crossflow.

  6. Value-Added Products from FGD Sulfite-Rich Scrubber Materials

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Vivak Malhotra

    2010-01-31

    According to the American Coal Ash Association, about 29.25 million tons of flue gas desulfurization (FGD) byproducts were produced in the USA in 2003. Out of 29.25 million tons, 17.35 million tons were sulfite-rich scrubber materials. At present, unlike its cousin FGD gypsum, the prospect for effective utilization of sulfite-rich scrubber materials is not bright. In fact, almost 16.9 million tons are leftover every year. In our pursuit to mitigate the liability of sulfite-rich FGD scrubber materials' disposal, we are attempting to develop value-added products that can commercially compete. More specifically, for this Innovative Concept Phase I project, we have the following objectives: to characterize the sulfite-rich scrubber material for toxic metals; to optimize the co-blending and processing of scrubber material and natural byproducts; to formulate and develop structural composites from sulfite-rich scrubber material; and to evaluate the composites' mechanical properties and compare them with current products on the market. After successfully demonstrating the viability of our research, a more comprehensive approach will be proposed to take these value-added materials to fruition.

  7. Study of in-duct spray drying using condensation aerosol. Final report, June 16, 1990--June 15, 1992

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Chen, W.J.R.; Chang, S.M.; Adikesavalu, R.

    1992-06-01

    Sulfur removal efficiency of in-duct spray drying is limited by sorbent content and surface properties of the sorbent-water aerosol. It was the purpose of this study to improve the sulfur removal efficiency for in-duct spray drying by injecting condensation aerosol instead of conventional dispersion aerosol. The program was composed of three phases. In Phase I, a novel pulsed fluid bed feeder was developed and was used to feed hydrated lime for subsequent experiments. A small condensation aerosol generator was then built, which produces a lime-water condensation aerosol by condensing steam on lime particles. The results show that novel lime-water aerosols less than 10 microns were generated. The central task in Phase II was to simulate experimentally in-duct spray drying using condensation aerosols and compare the results with those using dispersion aerosols reported in the literature. A small entrained-flow reactor was constructed to simulate an in-duct spray dryer. The condensation aerosol was then introduced to the reactor at various approach to saturation temperature, calcium/sulfur stoichiometry and sulfur dioxide concentration for desulfurization study. The results show that we have improved the sulfur removal efficiency for in-duct spray drying to 90 percent or above. Thus we have met and exceeded the stated project goal of 70 percent sulfur removal. A comprehensive computer code was employed to calculate sulfur removal efficiency in Phase III.

  8. High-solids paint overspray aerosols in a spray painting booth: particle size analysis and scrubber efficiency

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Chan, T.L.; D'arcy, J.B.; Schreck, R.M.

    1986-07-01

    Particle size distributions of high-solids acrylic-enamel paint overspray aerosols were determined isokinetically in a typical downdraft spray painting booth in which a 7-stage cascade impactor was used. Three different industrial paint atomizers were used, and the paint aerosols were characterized before and after a paint both scrubber. The mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of a metallic basecoat and an acrylic clearcoat paint aerosol from air-atomized spray guns ranged from 4-12 ..mu..m and was dependent on atomization pressure. When the paint booth was operated under controlled conditions simulating those in a plant, the collection efficiency of paint overspray aerosols by a paint scrubber was found to be size dependent and decreased sharply for particles smaller than 2 ..mu..m to as low as 64% for clearcoat paint particles of 0.6 ..mu..m. Improvement in the overall particulate removal efficiency can be achieved by optimizing the spray painting operations so as to produce the least amount of fine overspray paint aerosols less than 2 ..mu..m. Maintaining a higher static pressure drop across the paint both scrubber also will improve scrubber performance.

  9. Novel Adsorbent-Reactants for Treatment of Ash and Scrubber Pond Effluents

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Bill Batchelor; Dong Suk Han; Eun Jung Kim

    2010-01-31

    The overall goal of this project was to evaluate the ability of novel adsorbent/reactants to remove specific toxic target chemicals from ash and scrubber pond effluents while producing stable residuals for ultimate disposal. The target chemicals studied were arsenic (As(III) and As(V)), mercury (Hg(II)) and selenium (Se(IV) and Se(VI)). The adsorbent/reactants that were evaluated are iron sulfide (FeS) and pyrite (FeS{sub 2}). Procedures for measuring concentrations of target compounds and characterizing the surfaces of adsorbent-reactants were developed. Effects of contact time, pH (7, 8, 9, 10) and sulfate concentration (0, 1, 10 mM) on removal of all target compounds on both adsorbent-reactants were determined. Stability tests were conducted to evaluate the extent to which target compounds were released from the adsorbent-reactants when pH changed. Surface characterization was conducted with x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to identify reactions occurring on the surface between the target compounds and surface iron and sulfur. Results indicated that target compounds could be removed by FeS{sub 2} and FeS and that removal was affected by time, pH and surface reactions. Stability of residuals was generally good and appeared to be affected by the extent of surface reactions. Synthesized pyrite and mackinawite appear to have the required characteristics for removing the target compounds from wastewaters from ash ponds and scrubber ponds and producing stable residuals.

  10. FGD system capital and operating cost reductions based on improved thiosorbic scrubber system design and latest process innovations

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Smith, K.; Tseng, S.; Babu, M.

    1994-12-31

    Dravo Lime Company has operated the Miami Fort wet scrubber FGD pilot test unit since late 1989 and has continued in-house R&D to improve the economics of the magnesium-enhanced scrubbing process. Areas investigated include the scrubber configuration, flue gas velocity, spray nozzle type, droplet size, mist eliminator design, additives to inhibit oxidation, improved solids dewatering, etc. Also tested was the forced oxidation Thioclear process. The data gathered from the pilot plant and in-house programs were used to evaluate the capital and operating costs for the improved systems. These evaluations were made with eye towards the choices electric utilities will need to make in the near future to meet the Phase II emission limits mandated by the 1990 Clean Air Act. Some of the process modifications investigated, for example, the dewatering improvements apply to potential beneficial retrofit of existing FGD systems today.

  11. CHARACTERIZATION OF DWPF MELTER OFF-GAS QUENCHER AND STEAM ATOMIZED SCRUBBER DEPOSIT SAMPLES

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Zeigler, K; Ned Bibler, N

    2007-06-06

    This report summarizes the results from the characterization of deposits from the inlets of the primary off-gas Quencher and Steam Atomized Scrubber (SAS) in the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF), as requested by a technical assistance request. DWPF requested elemental analysis and compound identification to help determine the potential causes for the substance formation. This information will be fed into Savannah River National Laboratory modeling programs to determine if there is a way to decrease the formation of the deposits. The general approach to the characterization of these samples included x-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and chemical analysis. The following conclusions are drawn from the analytical results found in this report: (1) The deposits are not high level waste glass from the DWPF melt pool based on comparison of the compositions of deposits to the composition of a sample of glass taken from the pour stream of the melter during processing of Sludge Batch 3. (2) Chemical composition results suggest that the deposits are probably a combination of sludge and frit particles entrained in the off-gas. (3) Gamma emitters, such as Co-60, Cs-137, Eu-154, Am-241, and Am-243 were detected in both the Quencher and SAS samples with Cs-137 having the highest concentration of the gamma emitters. (4) No evidence existed for accumulation of fissile material (U-233, U-235, and Pu-239) relative to Fe in either deposit. (5) XRD results indicated both samples were primarily amorphorous and contained some crystals of the iron oxides, hematite and magnetite (Fe{sub 2}O{sub 3} and Fe(Fe{sub 2}O{sub 4})), along with sodium nitrate (NaNO{sub 3}). The other main crystalline compound in the SAS deposit was mercurous chloride. The main crystalline compound in the Quencher deposit was a uranium oxide compound. These are all sludge components. (6) SEM analysis of the Quencher deposit revealed crystalline uranium compounds within the sample. SEM analysis of the SAS sample could not be performed due to the presence of a significant concentration of Hg in the sample. (7) Essentially all the Na and the S in the off-gas samples were soluble in water. (8) The main soluble anion was NO{sub 3}{sup -} with SO{sub 4}{sup 2-} being second. (9) In contrast to the results for the off-gas deposits analyzed in 2003, soluble compounds of fluoride and chloride were detected; however, their concentrations in the Quencher and SAS deposits were less than one weight percent. (10) The results suggest that the S is primarily in the deposits as the sulfate anion.

  12. A 12-MW-scale pilot study of in-duct scrubbing (IDS) using a rotary atomizer

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Samuel, E.A.; Murphy, K.R.; Demian, A.

    1989-11-01

    A low-cost, moderate-removal efficiency, flue gas desulfurization (FGD) technology was selected by the US Department of Energy for pilot demonstration in its Acid Rain Precursor Control Technology Initiative. The process, identified as In-Duct Scrubbing (IDS), applies rotary atomizer techniques developed for lime-based spray dryer FGD while utilizing existing flue gas ductwork and particulate collectors. IDS technology is anticipated to result in a dry desulfurization process with a moderate removal efficiency (50% or greater) for high-sulfur coal-fired boilers. The critical elements for successful application are: (1) adequate mixing of sorbent droplets with flue gas for efficient reaction contact, (2) sufficient residence time to produce a non-wetting product, and (3) appropriate ductwork cross-sectional area to prevent deposition of wet reaction products before particle drying is comple. The ductwork in many older plants, previously modified to meet 1970 Clean Air Act requirements for particulate control, usually meet these criteria. A 12 MW-scale IDS pilot plant was constructed at the Muskingum River Plant of the American Electric Power System. The pilot plant, which operates from a slipstrem attached to the air-preheater outlet duct from the Unit 5 boiler at the Muskingum River Plant (which burns about 4% sulfur coal), is equipped with three atomizer stations to test the IDS concept in vertical and horizontal configurations. In addition, the pilot plant is equipped to test the effect of injecting IDS off- product upstream of the atomizer, on SO{sub 2}and NO{sub x} removals.

  13. Compact air scrubber

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Bentley, Bill F.; Jett, James H.; Martin, John C.; Saunders, George C.

    1992-01-01

    Method and apparatus for removing material from a gas. A mist created by a piezoelectric ultrasonic transducer is contacted with the gas and both gas and mist are passed through baffled separators. Liquid effluent from the separators contains solid material removed from the gas and gaseous material which reacted with the liquid or was absorbed by the liquid. The invention is useful for collecting a sample of material in a gas, such as a vapor in the atmosphere, and in cleaning a gas. A relatively concentrated solution of a material present in a gas in a very small concentration can be obtained.

  14. SUBMERGED GRAVEL SCRUBBER DEMONSTRATION AS A PASSIVE AIR CLEANER FOR CONTAINMENT VENTING AND PURGING WITH SODIUM AEROSOLS -- CSTF TESTS AC7 - AC10

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    HILLIARD, R K.; MCCORMACK, J D.; POSTMA, A K.

    1981-11-01

    Four large-scale air cleaning tests (AC7 - AC10) were performed in the Containment Systems Test Facility (CS'lF) to demonstrate the performance of a Submerged Gravel Scrubber for cleaning the effluent gas from a vented and purged breeder reactor containment vessel. The test article, comprised of a Submerged Gravel Scrubber (SGS) followed by a high efficiency fiber demister, had a design gas flow rate of 0.47 m{sup 3}/s (1000 ft{sup 3}/min) at a pressure drop of 9.0 kPa (36 in. H{sub 2}O). The test aerosol was sodium oxide, sodium hydroxide, or sodium carbonate generated in the 850-m{sup 3} CSTF vessel by continuously spraying sodium into the air-filled vessel while adding steam or carbon dioxide. Approximately 4500 kg (10,000 lb) of sodium was sprayed over a total period of 100 h during the tests. The SGS/Demister system was shown to be highly efficient (removing ~99.98% of the entering sodium aerosol mass), had a high mass loading capacity, and operated in a passive manner, with no electrical requirement. Models for predicting aerosol capture, gas cooling, and pressure drop are developed and compared with experimental results.

  15. Waste Treatment And Immobilization Plant U. S. Department Of Energy Office Of River Protection Submerged Bed Scrubber Condensate Disposition Project - Abstract # 13460

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Yanochko, Ronald M; Corcoran, Connie

    2012-11-15

    The Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) will generate an off-gas treatment system secondary liquid waste stream [submerged bed scrubber (SBS) condensate], which is currently planned for recycle back to the WTP Low Activity Waste (LAW) melter. This SBS condensate waste stream is high in Tc-99, which is not efficiently captured in the vitrified glass matrix. A pre-conceptual engineering study was prepared in fiscal year 2012 to evaluate alternate flow paths for melter off-gas secondary liquid waste generated by the WTP LAW facility. This study evaluated alternatives for direct off-site disposal of this SBS without pre-treatment, which mitigates potential issues associated with recycling.

  16. mhtml:file://H:\CATX\APPROVED-CXS\EERE FOA 1201 - Rankine Cycle

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Eaton Corporation STATE: WI PROJECT TITLE : Affordable Rankine Cycle Waste Heat Recovery for Heavy Duty Trucks Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-FOA-0001201 DE-EE0007286 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A), I have made the following determination: CX, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: B3.6 Small-scale research and

  17. Fluid placement of fixated scrubber sludge to reduce surface subsidence and to abate acid mine drainage in abandoned underground coal mines

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Meiers, R.J.; Golden, D.; Gray, R.; Yu, W.C.

    1995-12-31

    Indianapolis Power and Light Company (IPL) began researching the use of fluid placement techniques of the fixated scrubber sludge (FSS) to reduce surface subsidence from underground coal mines to develop an economic alternative to low strength concrete grout. Abandoned underground coal mines surround property adjacent to IPL`s coal combustion by-product (CCBP) landfill at the Petersburg Generating Station. Landfill expansion into these areas is in question because of the high potential for sinkhole subsidence to develop. Sinkholes manifesting at the surface would put the integrity of a liner or runoff pond containment structure for a CCBP disposal facility at risk. The fluid placement techniques of the FSS as a subsidence abatement technology was demonstrated during an eight week period in September, October, and November 1994 at the Petersburg Generating Station. The success of this technology will be determined by the percentage of the mine void filled, strength of the FSS placed, and the overall effects on the hydrogeologic environment. The complete report for this project will be finalized in early 1996.

  18. Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant U. S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection Submerged Bed Scrubber Condensate Disposition Project - 13460

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Yanochko, Ronald M. [Washington River Protection Solutions, P.O. Box 850, Richland, Washington 99352 (United States)] [Washington River Protection Solutions, P.O. Box 850, Richland, Washington 99352 (United States); Corcoran, Connie [AEM Consulting, LLC, 1201 Jadwin Avenue, Richland, Washington 99352 (United States)] [AEM Consulting, LLC, 1201 Jadwin Avenue, Richland, Washington 99352 (United States)

    2013-07-01

    The Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) will generate an off-gas treatment system secondary liquid waste stream [submerged bed scrubber (SBS) condensate], which is currently planned for recycle back to the WTP Low Activity Waste (LAW) melter. This SBS condensate waste stream is high in Tc-99, which is not efficiently captured in the vitrified glass matrix [1]. A pre-conceptual engineering study was prepared in fiscal year 2012 to evaluate alternate flow paths for melter off-gas secondary liquid waste generated by the WTP LAW facility [2]. This study evaluated alternatives for direct off-site disposal of this SBS without pre-treatment, which mitigates potential issues associated with recycling. This study [2] concluded that SBS direct disposal is a viable option to the WTP baseline. The results show: - Off-site transportation and disposal of the SBS condensate is achievable and cost effective. - Reduction of approximately 4,325 vitrified WTP Low Activity Waste canisters could be realized. - Positive WTP operational impacts; minimal WTP construction impacts are realized. - Reduction of mass flow from the LAW Facility to the Pretreatment Facility by 66%. - Improved Double Shell Tank (DST) space management is a benefit. (authors)

  19. Characterizing toxic emissions from a coal-fired power plant demonstrating the AFGD ICCT Project and a plant utilizing a dry scrubber/baghouse system: Bailly Station Units 7 and 8 and AFGD ICCT Project. Final report. Final report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Dismukes, E.B.

    1994-10-20

    This report describes results of assessment of the risk of emissions of hazardous air pollutants at one of the electric power stations, Bailly Station, which is also the site of a Clean Coal Technology project demonstrating the Pure Air Advanced Flue Gas Desulfurization process (wet limestone). This station represents the configuration of no NO{sub x} reduction, particulate control with electrostatic precipitators, and SO{sub 2} control with a wet scrubber. The test was conducted September 3--6, 1993. Sixteen trace metals were determined along with 5 major metals. Other inorganic substances and organic compounds were also determined.

  20. CX-009842: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Demonstration of Multipollutant Reduction using a Lextran 3-in-1 Wet Scrubber CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 01/30/2013 Location(s): North Dakota Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  1. CX-004776: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Recovery Act: Innovative Carbon Dioxide Sequestration from Flue Gas using an In-Duct ScrubberCX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6Date: 12/27/2010Location(s): Grand Forks, North DakotaOffice(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  2. CX-004777: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Recovery Act: Innovative Carbon Dioxide Sequestration from Flue Gas using an In-Duct ScrubberCX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6Date: 12/27/2010Location(s): Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaOffice(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  3. CX-004778: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Recovery Act: Innovative Carbon Dioxide Sequestration from Flue Gas using an In-Duct ScrubberCX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6Date: 12/27/2010Location(s): Point Comfort, TexasOffice(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  4. Minimizing Energy Losses in Ducts | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    maintain a neutral pressure within the house. Even well sealed and insulated ducts will leak and lose some heat, so many new energy-efficient homes place the duct system within the...

  5. Design and operating experience of the Holcomb Station dry scrubber

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Emerson, R.D.

    1985-01-01

    The Holcomb Station dry flue gas desulfurization system has been operational since May, 1983. The lime based system, consisting of three spray drying absorbers and two baghouses, has met all regulatory compliance requirements and contractual guarantee values. Some serious operational problems were encountered during the startup of this system. This paper discusses these problems and subsequent solutions along with testing experience to-date. The availability of this system for the first quarter of 1985 was 99.51 percent.

  6. Evaporation of iodine-containing off-gas scrubber solution

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Partridge, J.A.; Bosuego, G.P.

    1980-07-14

    Mercuric nitrate-nitric acid scrub solutions containing radioiodine may be reduced in volume without excessive loss of volatile iodine. The use of concentrated nitric acid during an evaporation process oxidizes the mercury-iodide complex to a less volatile mercuric iodate precipitate.

  7. In-duct humidification system development for the LIMB demonstration project

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Amrhein, G.T.; Smith, P.V. )

    1988-01-01

    Two keys to an operable humidification system are the atomizer design and the atomizer arrangement within the duct. The atomizer must produce a spray of extremely small droplets in order to achieve complete evaporation in the short residence times available in most ducts. The atomizers must also be installed in such a way as to prevent droplet impingement on the duct walls, minimize the ash deposition on the atomizer tip, and maximize the mixing between the spray and flue gas. Good mixing is essential to maximize SO{sub 2} removal and to ensure complete evaporation. A full-scale demonstration of LIMB technology will be conducted on the 105 MW, Unit 4 Boiler at Ohio Edison's Edgewater Station in Lorain, Ohio. This paper presents the results of a project to develop a humidification system for the full-scale demonstration.

  8. Guarantee Testing Results from the Greenidge Mult-Pollutant Control Project

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Daniel P. Connell; James E. Locke

    2008-02-01

    CONSOL Energy Inc. Research & Development (CONSOL R&D) performed flue gas sampling at AES Greenidge to verify the performance of the multi-pollutant control system recently installed by Babcock Power Environmental Inc. (BPEI) on the 107-megawatt (MW) Unit 4 (Boiler 6). The multi-pollutant control system includes combustion modifications and a hybrid selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR)/induct selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system to reduce NO{sub x} emissions, followed by a Turbosorp{reg_sign} circulating fluidized bed dry scrubber system and baghouse to reduce emissions of SO{sub 2}, SO{sub 3}, HCl, HF, and particulate matter. Mercury removal is provided via the co-benefits afforded by the in-duct SCR, dry scrubber, and baghouse and by injection of activated carbon upstream of the scrubber, as required. Testing was conducted through ports located at the inlet and outlet of the SCR reactor to evaluate the performance of the hybrid NO{sub x} control system, as well as through ports located at the air heater outlet and baghouse outlet or stack to determine pollutant removal efficiencies across the Turbosorp{reg_sign} scrubber and baghouse. Data from the unit's stack continuous emission monitor (CEM) were also used for determining attainment of the performance targets for NO{sub x} emissions and SO{sub 2} removal efficiency.

  9. Mercuric iodate precipitation from radioiodine-containing off-gas scrubber solution

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Partridge, Jerry A. (Richland, WA); Bosuego, Gail P. (Richland, WA)

    1982-01-01

    Mercuric nitrate-nitric acid scrub solutions containing radioiodine may be reduced in volume without excessive loss of volatile iodine. The use of concentrated nitric acid during an evaporation process oxidizes the mercury-iodide complex to a less volatile mercuric iodate precipitate.

  10. Enhanced NO{sub x} removal in wet scrubbers using metal chelates. Final report, Volume 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Smith, K.; Lani, B.; Berisko, D.; Schultz, C.; Carlson, W.; Benson, L.B.

    1992-12-01

    Successful pilot plant tests of simultaneous removal of S0{sub 2} and NO{sub x} in a wet lime flue gas desulfurization system were concluded in December. The tests, at up to 1.5 MW(e) capacity, were conducted by the Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company and Dravo Lime Company for the US Department of Energy at a pilot facility at the Miami Fort station of CG&E near Cincinnati, Ohio. The pilot plant scrubbed a slipstream of flue gas from Unit 7, a 530 MW coal-fired electric generating unit. Tests were conducted in three phases between April and December. The technology tested was wet scrubbing with Thiosorbic{reg_sign} magnesium-enhanced lime for S0{sub 2} removal and simultaneous NO scrubbing with ferrous EDTA, a metal chelate. Magnesium-enhanced lime-based wet scrubbing is used at 20 full-scale high-sulfur coal-fired electric generating units with a combined capacity of 8500 NW. Ferrous EDTA reacts with nitric oxide, NO, which comprises about 95% of NO{sub x} from coal-fired boilers. In this report, although not precise, NO and NO{sub x} are used interchangably. A major objective of the tests was to combine NO{sub x} removal using ferrous EDTA, a developing technology, with SO{sub 2} removal using wet lime FGD, already in wide commercial use. If successful, this could allow wide application of this NO{sub x} removal technology.

  11. Removal of hydrogen sulfide from waste treatment plant biogas using the apollo scrubber

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Smith, J.W.; Burrowes, P.A.; Gupta, A.; Walton, P.S.; Meffe, S.

    1996-12-31

    The removal of hydrogen sulfide and other sulphur compounds from anaerobic digester gas streams prior to their use as fuel for boilers, stationary engines, and cogeneration units minimizes corrosion problems and reduces sulfur emission loadings. A research program at the Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto in the 1980`s demonstrated the use of a modified flotation cell for the absorption of hydrogen sulfide from a gas stream and its catalytic oxidation to sulfur. The essence of the technology was a proprietary gas liquid contactor which provided very high mass transfer rates at the interface. A bench scale contactor developed at the university achieved hydrogen sulfide removal efficiencies of over 99.9% at atmospheric pressure. A demonstration unit for digester gas scrubbing applications was designed, fabricated, and then installed and evaluated at the Metropolitan Toronto Works Department - Main Treatment Plant (MTP).

  12. Model for flue-gas desulfurization in a circulating dry scrubber

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Neathery, J.K.

    1996-01-01

    A simple model was developed to describe the absorption of SO{sub 2} in a circulating dry scrubbing (CDS) process, which is a semi dry, lime-based, flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) process that utilizes a circulating fluidized bed arrangement for contacting a sorbent with SO{sub 2}-laden flue gas under coolside conditions. The reaction chemistry is thought to be similar to that of spray-drying absorption. The liquid-phase mass-transfer coefficient was successfully modeled as a function of the sorbent particle spacing on the wetted surfaces. Gas-phase mass-transfer resistances were assumed to be insignificant. Due to the high surface area available in a CDS reactor, the evaporation rate of water from the slurry was modeled as constant-rate drying according to classic spray-dryer theory. However, the falling-rate and diffusion evaporation stages were negligible in CDS since sorbent particle bunching at the surface of the slurry is nonexistent.

  13. Specifically Designed Constructed Wetlands: A Novel Treatment Approach for Scrubber Wastewater

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    John H. Rodgers Jr; James W. Castle; Chris Arrington: Derek Eggert; Meg Iannacone

    2005-09-01

    A pilot-scale wetland treatment system was specifically designed and constructed at Clemson University to evaluate removal of mercury, selenium, and other constituents from flue gas desulfurization (FGD) wastewater. Specific objectives of this research were: (1) to measure performance of a pilot-scale constructed wetland treatment system in terms of decreases in targeted constituents (Hg, Se and As) in the FGD wastewater from inflow to outflow; (2) to determine how the observed performance is achieved (both reactions and rates); and (3) to measure performance in terms of decreased bioavailability of these elements (i.e. toxicity of sediments in constructed wetlands and toxicity of outflow waters from the treatment system). Performance of the pilot-scale constructed wetland treatment systems was assessed using two criteria: anticipated NPDES permit levels and toxicity evaluations using two sentinel toxicity-testing organisms (Ceriodaphnia dubia and Pimephales promelas). These systems performed efficiently with varied inflow simulations of FGD wastewaters removing As, Hg, and Se concentrations below NPDES permit levels and reducing the toxicity of simulated FGD wastewater after treatment with the constructed wetland treatment systems. Sequential extraction procedures indicated that these elements (As, Hg, and Se) were bound to residual phases within sediments of these systems, which should limit their bioavailability to aquatic biota. Sediments collected from constructed wetland treatment systems were tested to observe toxicity to Hyalella azteca or Chironomus tetans. Complete survival (100%) was observed for H. azteca in all cells of the constructed wetland treatment system and C. tentans had an average of 91% survival over the three treatment cells containing sediments. Survival and growth of H. azteca and C. tentans did not differ significantly between sediments from the constructed wetland treatment system and controls. Since the sediments of the constructed wetland treatment system are repositories for As, Hg, and Se and the bioavailability of these elements decreased after deposition, the pilot-scale constructed wetland treatment system contributed significantly to mitigation of risks to aquatic life from these elements.

  14. Recovery Act: Innovative CO2 Sequestration from Flue Gas Using Industrial Sources and Innovative Concept for Beneficial CO2 Use

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Dando, Neal; Gershenzon, Mike; Ghosh, Rajat

    2012-07-31

    field testing of a biomimetic in-duct scrubbing system for the capture of gaseous CO2 coupled with sequestration of captured carbon by carbonation of alkaline industrial wastes. The Phase 2 project, reported on here, combined efforts in enzyme development, scrubber optimization, and sequestrant evaluations to perform an economic feasibility study of technology deployment. The optimization of carbonic anhydrase (CA) enzyme reactivity and stability are critical steps in deployment of this technology. A variety of CA enzyme variants were evaluated for reactivity and stability in both bench scale and in laboratory pilot scale testing to determine current limits in enzyme performance. Optimization of scrubber design allowed for improved process economics while maintaining desired capture efficiencies. A range of configurations, materials, and operating conditions were examined at the Alcoa Technical Center on a pilot scale scrubber. This work indicated that a cross current flow utilizing a specialized gas-liquid contactor offered the lowest system operating energy. Various industrial waste materials were evaluated as sources of alkalinity for the scrubber feed solution and as sources of calcium for precipitation of carbonate. Solids were mixed with a simulated sodium bicarbonate scrubber blowdown to comparatively examine reactivity. Supernatant solutions and post-test solids were analyzed to quantify and model the sequestration reactions. The best performing solids were found to sequester between 2.3 and 2.9 moles of CO2 per kg of dry solid in 1-4 hours of reaction time. These best performing solids were cement kiln dust, circulating dry scrubber ash, and spray dryer absorber ash. A techno-economic analysis was performed to evaluate the commercial viability of the proposed carbon capture and sequestration process in full-scale at an aluminum smelter and a refinery location. For both cases the in-duct scrubber technology was compared to traditional amine- based capture. Incorporation of the laboratory results showed that for the application at the aluminum smelter, the in-duct scrubber system is more economical than traditional methods. However, the reverse is true for the refinery case, where the bauxite residue is not effective enough as a sequestrant, combined with challenges related to contaminants in the bauxite residue accumulating in and fouling the scrubber absorbent. Sensitivity analyses showed that the critical variables by which process economics could be improved are enzyme concentration, efficiency, and half-life. At the end of the first part of the Phase 2 project, a gate review (DOE Decision Zero Gate Point) was conducted to decide on the next stages of the project. The original plan was to follow the pre-testing phase with a detailed design for the field testing. Unfavorable process economics, however, resulted in a decision to conclude the project before moving to field testing. It is noted that CO2 Solutions proposed an initial solution to reduce process costs through more advanced enzyme management, however, DOE program requirements restricting any technology development extending beyond 2014 as commercial deployment timeline did not allow this solution to be undertaken.

  15. The Discrete Equation Method (DEM) for Fully Compressible, Two-Phase Flows in Ducts of Spatially Varying Cross-Section

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    R. A. Berry; R. Saurel; O. LeMetayer

    2010-11-01

    For the simulation of light water nuclear reactor coolant flows, general two-phase models (valid for all volume fractions) have been generally used which, while allowing for velocity disequilibrium, normally force pressure equilibrium between the phases (see, for example, the numerous models of this type described in H. Stdtke, Gasdynamic Aspects of Two-Phase Flow, Wiley-VCH, 2006). These equations are not hyperbolic, their physical wave dynamics are incorrect, and their solution algorithms rely on dubious truncation error induced artificial viscosity to render them numerically well posed over a portion of the computational spectrum. The inherent problems of the traditional approach to multiphase modeling, which begins with an averaged system of (ill-posed) partial differential equations (PDEs) which are then discretized to form a numerical scheme, are avoided by employing a new homogenization method known as the Discrete Equation Method (DEM) (R. Abgrall and R. Saurel, Discrete Equations for Physical and Numerical Compressible Multiphase Mixtures, J. Comp. Phys. 186, 361-396, 2003). This method results in well-posed hyperbolic systems, this property being important for transient flows. This also allows a clear treatment of non-conservative terms (terms involving interfacial variables and volume fraction gradients) permitting the solution of interface problems without conservation errors, this feature being important for the direct numerical simulation of two-phase flows. Unlike conventional methods, the averaged system of PDEs for the mixture are not used, and the DEM method directly obtains a well-posed discrete equation system from the single-phase conservation laws, producing a numerical scheme which accurately computes fluxes for arbitrary number of phases and solves non-conservative products. The method effectively uses a sequence of single phase Riemann problem solutions. Phase interactions are accounted for by Riemann solvers at each interface. Non-conservative terms are correctly approximated. Some of the closure relations missing from the traditional approach are automatically obtained. Lastly, the continuous equation system resulting from the discrete equations can be identified by taking the continuous limit with weak-wave assumptions. In this work, this approach is tested by constructing a DEM model for the flow of two compressible phases in 1-D ducts of spatially varying cross-section with explicit time integration. An analytical equation of state is included for both water vapor and liquid phases, and a realistic interphase mass transfer model is developed based on interphase heat transfer. A robust compliment of boundary conditions are developed and discussed. Though originally conceived as a first step toward implict time integration of the DEM method (to relieve time step size restrictions due to stiffness and to achieve tighter coupling of equations) in multidimensions, this model offers some unique capabilities for incorporation into next generation light water reactor safety analysis codes. We demonstrate, on a converging-diverging two-phase nozzle, that this well-posed, 2-pressure, 2-velocity DEM model can be integrated to a realistic and meaningful steady-state with both phases treated as compressible.

  16. Theoretical approach for enhanced mass transfer effects in-duct flue gas desulfurization processes. Volume 2, Duct spray drying: Final report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Jozewicz, W.; Rochelle, G.T.

    1992-01-29

    Removal of sulfur dioxide (SO{sub 2}) from the flue gas of coal- burning power plants can be achieved by duct spray drying using calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH){sub 2}] slurries. A primary objective of this research was to discover the aspects of mass transfer into Ca(OH){sub 2} slurries which limit SO{sub 2} absorption. A bench- scale stirred tank reactor with a flat gas/liquid interface was used to simulate SO{sub 2} absorption in a slurry droplet. The absorption rate of SO{sub 2} from gas concentrations of 500 to 5000 ppm was measured at 55{degrees}C in clear solutions and slurries of Ca(OH){sub 2} up to 1.0 M (7 wt percent). Results are reported in terms of the enhancement factor, {O}. This research will allow prediction of conditions where the absorption of SO{sub 2} in Ca(OH){sub 2} slurries can be enhanced by changes to liquid phase constituents (under which SO{sub 2} absorption is controlled by liquid film mass transfer). Experiments in the stirred tank have shown that SO{sub 2} absorption in a 1.0 M Ca(OH){sub 2} slurry was completely dominated by gas film mass transfer with a large excess of Ca(OH){sub 2} but becomes controlled by liquid film resistance at greater than 50 percent Ca(OH){sub 2} utilization. (VC)

  17. Definitions - D

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    generation, flood control, irrigation, or other use. Also refers to the act of lowering reservoir levels. dry scrubber See scrubber. DSI Direct-service industry. See...

  18. Detection and treatment of chemical weapons and/or biological...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    pathogens uses a detector system, an electrostatic precipitator or scrubber, a circulation system, and a control. The precipitator or scrubber is activated in response to a...

  19. Addendum to Guarantee Testing Results from the Greenidge Multi-Pollutant Control Project: Additiona NH3, NOx, and CO Testing Results

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Daniel P. Connell; James E. Locke

    2008-03-01

    On March 28-30 and May 1-4, 2007, CONSOL Energy Inc. Research & Development (CONSOL R&D) performed flue gas sampling at AES Greenidge to verify the performance of the multi-pollutant control system recently installed by Babcock Power Environmental Inc. (BPEI) on the 107-MW Unit 4 (Boiler 6). The multi-pollutant control system includes combustion modifications and a hybrid selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR)/in-duct selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system to reduce NO{sub x} emissions, followed by a Turbosorp{reg_sign} circulating fluidized bed dry scrubber system and baghouse to reduce emissions of SO{sub 2}, SO{sub 3}, HCl, HF, and particulate matter. Mercury removal is provided via the co-benefits afforded by the in-duct SCR, dry scrubber, and baghouse and by injection of activated carbon upstream of the scrubber, as required. The testing in March and May demonstrated that the multi-pollutant control system attained its performance targets for NO{sub x} emissions, SO{sub 2} removal efficiency, acid gas (SO{sub 3}, HCl, and HF) removal efficiency, and mercury removal efficiency. However, the ammonia slip measured between the SCR outlet and air heater inlet was consistently greater than the guarantee of 2 ppmvd {at} 3% O{sub 2}. As a result, additional testing was performed on May 30-June 1 and on June 20-21, 2007, in conjunction with tuning of the hybrid NO{sub x} control system by BPEI, in an effort to achieve the performance target for ammonia slip. This additional testing occurred after the installation of a large particle ash (LPA) screen and removal system just above the SCR reactor and a fresh SCR catalyst layer in mid-May. This report describes the results of the additional tests. During the May 30-June 1 sampling period, CONSOL R&D and Clean Air Engineering (CAE) each measured flue gas ammonia concentrations at the air heater inlet, downstream of the in-duct SCR reactor. In addition, CONSOL R&D measured flue gas ammonia concentrations at the economizer outlet, upstream of the SCR reactor, and CAE measured flue gas NO{sub x} and CO concentrations at the sampling grids located at the inlet and outlet of the SCR reactor. During the June 20-21 sampling period, CONSOL R&D measured flue gas ammonia concentrations at the air heater inlet. All ammonia measurements were performed using a modified version of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Conditional Test Method (CTM) 027. The NO{sub x} and CO measurements were performed using U.S. EPA Methods 7E and 10, respectively.

  20. Greenridge Multi-Pollutant Control Project Preliminary Public Design Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Daniel P. Connell

    2009-01-12

    The Greenidge Multi-Pollutant Control Project is being conducted as part of the U.S. Department of Energy's Power Plant Improvement Initiative to demonstrate an innovative combination of air pollution control technologies that can cost-effectively reduce emissions of SO{sub 2}, NO{sub x}, Hg, acid gases (SO{sub 3}, HCl, and HF), and particulate matter from smaller coal-fired electrical generating units (EGUs). The multi-pollutant control system includes a hybrid selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR)/in-duct selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system to reduce NOx emissions by {ge}60%, followed by a Turbosorp{reg_sign} circulating fluidized bed dry scrubber system to reduce emissions of SO{sub 2}, SO{sub 3}, HCl, and HF by {ge}95%. Mercury removal of {ge}90% is also targeted via the co-benefits afforded by the in-duct SCR, dry scrubber, and baghouse and by injection of activated carbon upstream of the scrubber, as required. The technology is particularly well suited, because of its relatively low capital and maintenance costs and small space requirements, to meet the needs of coal-fired units with capacities of 50-300 MWe. There are about 440 such units in the United States that currently are not equipped with SCR, flue gas desulfurization (FGD), or mercury control systems. These smaller units are a valuable part of the nation's energy infrastructure, constituting about 60 GW of installed capacity. However, with the onset of the Clean Air Interstate Rule, Clean Air Mercury Rule, and various state environmental actions requiring deep reductions in emissions of SO{sub 2}, NO{sub x}, and mercury, the continued operation of these units increasingly depends upon the ability to identify viable air pollution control retrofit options for them. The large capital costs and sizable space requirements associated with conventional technologies such as SCR and wet FGD make these technologies unattractive for many smaller units. The Greenidge Project aims to confirm the commercial readiness of an emissions control system that is specifically designed to meet the environmental compliance requirements of these smaller coal-fired EGUs. The multi-pollutant control system is being installed and tested on the AES Greenidge Unit 4 (Boiler 6) by a team including CONSOL Energy Inc. as prime contractor, AES Greenidge LLC as host site owner, and Babcock Power Environmental Inc. as engineering, procurement, and construction contractor. All funding for the project is being provided by the U.S. Department of Energy, through its National Energy Technology Laboratory, and by AES Greenidge. AES Greenidge Unit 4 is a 107 MW{sub e} (net), 1950s vintage, tangentially-fired, reheat unit that is representative of many of the 440 smaller coal-fired units identified above. Following design and construction, the multi-pollutant control system will be demonstrated over an approximately 20-month period while the unit fires 2-4% sulfur eastern U.S. bituminous coal and co-fires up to 10% biomass. This Preliminary Public Design Report is the first in a series of two reports describing the design of the multi-pollutant control facility that is being demonstrated at AES Greenidge. Its purpose is to consolidate for public use all available nonproprietary design information on the Greenidge Multi-Pollutant Control Project. As such, the report includes a discussion of the process concept, design objectives, design considerations, and uncertainties associated with the multi-pollutant control system and also summarizes the design of major process components and balance of plant considerations for the AES Greenidge Unit 4 installation. The Final Public Design Report, the second report in the series, will update this Preliminary Public Design Report to reflect the final, as-built design of the facility and to incorporate data on capital costs and projected operating costs.

  1. Flue gas desulfurization method and apparatus

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Madden, Deborah A. (Canfield, OH); Farthing, George A. (Washington Township, OH)

    1998-09-29

    A combined furnace limestone injection and dry scrubber flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system collects solids from the flue gas stream in first particulate collection device located downstream of an outlet of a convection pass of the furnace and upstream of the dry scrubber. The collected solids are diverted to the dry scrubber feed slurry preparation system to increase sulfur oxide species removal efficiency and sorbent utilization. The level of lime in the feed slurry provided to the dry scrubber is thus increased, which enhances removal of sulfur oxide species in the dry scrubber. The decreased particulate loading to the dry scrubber helps maintain a desired degree of free moisture in the flue gas stream entering the dry scrubber, which enhances sulfur oxide species removal both in the dry scrubber and downstream particulate collector, normally a baghouse.

  2. Flue gas desulfurization method and apparatus

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Madden, Deborah A. (Canfield, OH); Farthing, George A. (Washington Township, Stark County, OH)

    1998-08-18

    A combined furnace limestone injection and dry scrubber flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system collects solids from the flue gas stream in first particulate collection device located downstream of an outlet of a convection pass of the furnace and upstream of the dry scrubber. The collected solids are diverted to the dry scrubber feed slurry preparation system to increase sulfur oxide species removal efficiency and sorbent utilization. The level of lime in the feed slurry provided to the dry scrubber is thus increased, which enhances removal of sulfur oxide species in the dry scrubber. The decreased particulate loading to the dry scrubber helps maintain a desired degree of free moisture in the flue gas stream entering the dry scrubber, which enhances sulfur oxide species removal both in the dry scrubber and downstream particulate collector, normally a baghouse.

  3. Flue gas desulfurization method and apparatus

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Madden, D.A.; Farthing, G.A.

    1998-08-18

    A combined furnace limestone injection and dry scrubber flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system collects solids from the flue gas stream in first particulate collection device located downstream of an outlet of a convection pass of the furnace and upstream of the dry scrubber. The collected solids are diverted to the dry scrubber feed slurry preparation system to increase sulfur oxide species removal efficiency and sorbent utilization. The level of lime in the feed slurry provided to the dry scrubber is thus increased, which enhances removal of sulfur oxide species in the dry scrubber. The decreased particulate loading to the dry scrubber helps maintain a desired degree of free moisture in the flue gas stream entering the dry scrubber, which enhances sulfur oxide species removal both in the dry scrubber and downstream particulate collector, normally a baghouse. 5 figs.

  4. Flue gas desulfurization method and apparatus

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Madden, D.A.; Farthing, G.A.

    1998-09-29

    A combined furnace limestone injection and dry scrubber flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system collects solids from the flue gas stream in first particulate collection device located downstream of an outlet of a convection pass of the furnace and upstream of the dry scrubber. The collected solids are diverted to the dry scrubber feed slurry preparation system to increase sulfur oxide species removal efficiency and sorbent utilization. The level of lime in the feed slurry provided to the dry scrubber is thus increased, which enhances removal of sulfur oxide species in the dry scrubber. The decreased particulate loading to the dry scrubber helps maintain a desired degree of free moisture in the flue gas stream entering the dry scrubber, which enhances sulfur oxide species removal both in the dry scrubber and downstream particulate collector, normally a baghouse. 5 figs.

  5. bia-cemkiln | netl.doe.gov

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2 Cement Kiln Flue Gas Recovery Scrubber - Project Brief [PDF-247KB] Passamaquoddy Technology Limited Partnership, Thomaston, ME Program Publications Final Reports Passamaquoddy Technology Recovery Scrubber(tm) Final Report, Volume 1 [PDF-5.4MB] (Feb 1994) Final Report, Volume 2 and Appendices A - M [PDF-10.4MB] (Feb 1994) CCT Reports: Project Performance Summaries, Post-Project Assessments, & Topical Reports Cement Kiln Flue Gas Recovery Scrubber Project: A DOE Assessment [PDF-246KB] (Nov

  6. Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants; Volume...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Rich Solvent Rich Solvent Direct Contact Cooler (DCC) and Polishing Scrubber Wash Water Filter DCC Circulating Water Filter Blower Condenser Product CO 2 Overhead...

  7. solvent-novozymes | netl.doe.gov

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    will be a carbon dioxide (CO2) capture process with improved efficiency, economics, and sustainability when compared with existing CO2 scrubber technologies. The application of...

  8. Fine particle (2.5 microns) emissions: regulations, measurement, and control

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    John D. McKenna; James H. Turner; James P. McKenna, Jr.

    2008-09-15

    Contents: Introduction; Health effects; Air monitoring; Emission control methods - fabric filter/baghouses, electrostatic precipitators, wet scrubbers; Environmental technology verification and baghouse filtration products; Cost considerations; and Nanoparticulates.

  9. Carbon Nanotube Field Emission Devices - Energy Innovation Portal

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Potential applications include mobile computing and communication devices, LCDs, electrostatic scrubbers for industrial air pollution control, and any applications requiring high ...

  10. Greenidge Multi-Pollutant Control Project

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Daniel Connell

    2008-10-18

    The Greenidge Multi-Pollutant Control Project was conducted as part of the U.S. Department of Energy's Power Plant Improvement Initiative to demonstrate an innovative combination of air pollution control technologies that can cost-effectively reduce emissions of SO{sub 2}, NO{sub x}, Hg, acid gases (SO{sub 3}, HCl, and HF), and particulate matter from smaller coal-fired electric generating units (EGUs). There are about 400 units in the United States with capacities of 50-300 MW that currently are not equipped with selective catalytic reduction (SCR), flue gas desulfurization (FGD), or mercury control systems. Many of these units, which collectively represent more than 55 GW of installed capacity, are difficult to retrofit for deep emission reductions because of space constraints and unfavorable economies of scale, making them increasingly vulnerable to retirement or fuel switching in the face of progressively more stringent environmental regulations. The Greenidge Project sought to confirm the commercial readiness of an emissions control system that is specifically designed to meet the environmental compliance requirements of these smaller coal-fired EGUs by offering a combination of deep emission reductions, low capital costs, small space requirements, applicability to high-sulfur coals, mechanical simplicity, and operational flexibility. The multi-pollutant control system includes a NO{sub x}OUT CASCADE{reg_sign} hybrid selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR)/in-duct SCR system for NO{sub x} control and a Turbosorp{reg_sign} circulating fluidized bed dry scrubbing system (with a new baghouse) for SO{sub 2}, SO{sub 3}, HCl, HF, and particulate matter control. Mercury removal is provided as a co-benefit of the in-duct SCR, dry scrubber, and baghouse, and by injection of activated carbon upstream of the scrubber, if required. The multi-pollutant control system was installed and tested on the 107-MW{sub e}, 1953-vintage AES Greenidge Unit 4 by a team including CONSOL Energy Inc. as prime contractor, AES Greenidge LLC as host site owner, and Babcock Power Environmental Inc. as engineering, procurement, and construction contractor. About 44% of the funding for the project was provided by the U.S. Department of Energy, through its National Energy Technology Laboratory, and the remaining 56% was provided by AES Greenidge. Project goals included reducing high-load NO{sub x} emissions to {le} 0.10 lb/mmBtu; reducing SO{sub 2}, SO{sub 3}, HCl, and HF emissions by at least 95%; and reducing Hg emissions by at least 90% while the unit fired 2-4% sulfur eastern U.S. bituminous coal and co-fired up to 10% biomass. This report details the final results from the project. The multi-pollutant control system was constructed in 2006, with a total plant cost of $349/kW and a footprint of 0.4 acre - both substantially less than would have been required to retrofit AES Greenidge Unit 4 with a conventional SCR and wet scrubber. Start-up of the multi-pollutant control system was completed in March 2007, and the performance of the system was then evaluated over an approximately 18-month period of commercial operation. Guarantee tests conducted in March-June 2007 demonstrated attainment of all of the emission reduction goals listed above. Additional tests completed throughout the performance evaluation period showed 96% SO{sub 2} removal, 98% mercury removal (with no activated carbon injection), 95% SO{sub 3} removal, and 97% HCl removal during longer-term operation. Greater than 95% SO{sub 2} removal efficiency was observed even when the unit fired high-sulfur coals containing up to 4.8 lb SO{sub 2}/mmBtu. Particulate matter emissions were reduced by more than 98% relative to the emission rate observed prior to installation of the technology. The performance of the hybrid SNCR/SCR system was affected by problems with large particle ash, ammonia slip, and nonideal combustion characteristics, and high-load NO{sub x} emissions averaged 0.14 lb/mmBtu during long-term operation. Nevertheless, the system has reduced the unit's overall NO{sub x} emissions by 52% on a lb/mmBtu basis. The commercial viability of the multi-pollutant control system was demonstrated at AES Greenidge Unit 4. The system, which remains in service after the conclusion of the project, has enabled the unit to satisfy its permit requirements while continuing to operate profitably. As a result of the success at AES Greenidge Unit 4, three additional deployments of the Turbosorp{reg_sign} technology had been announced by the end of the project.

  11. Detection and treatment of chemical weapons and/or biological pathogens

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Mariella Jr., Raymond P.

    2004-09-07

    A system for detection and treatment of chemical weapons and/or biological pathogens uses a detector system, an electrostatic precipitator or scrubber, a circulation system, and a control. The precipitator or scrubber is activated in response to a signal from the detector upon the detection of chemical weapons and/or biological pathogens.

  12. CX-008179: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Building 09-056 Demolition CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 04/24/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Pantex Site Office

  13. CX-007550: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Kearney - Waste Water Treatment Plant CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 01/10/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  14. CX-007549: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Harrisonville - Waste Water Treatment Plant CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 01/10/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  15. CX-012310: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Sawmill Creek Stream Bank Erosion CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/06/2014 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Argonne Site Office

  16. CX-009423: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Relay and Switchboard Panel Replacements CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 10/29/2012 Location(s): Arkansas Offices(s): Southwestern Power Administration

  17. CX-011626: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Line Yard Fence Project CX(s) Applied: B1.11 Date: 06/05/2013 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Y-12 Site Office

  18. CX-011628: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Enclosure Modification Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/05/2013 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Y-12 Site Office

  19. CX-011630: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    9831 Wall Construction Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/05/2013 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Y-12 Site Office

  20. CX-009753: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Propane Corridor Development Program CX(s) Applied: B5.22 Date: 12/06/2012 Location(s): Georgia Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  1. CX-012799: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Malin-Hilltop Wood Pole Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41915 Location(s): CaliforniaOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  2. CX-012805: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Brasada-Harney #1 Wood Pole Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41908 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  3. CX-012813: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Redmond-Pilot Butte #1 Wood Pole Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41893 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  4. CX-010479: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Load Control System Reliability CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 05/29/2013 Location(s): Wyoming Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  5. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Western Area PowerAdministratio...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    August 21, 2014 CX-012764: Categorical Exclusion Determination Kayenta-Navajo 230 Kilovolt Transmission Line Access Road Maintenance Coconini and Navajo Counties, Arizona CX(s) ...

  6. CX-006006: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Deployment of Innovative Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy - Agriculture CX(s) ... Act funds to the Oregon Department of Agriculture to install improved efficiency ...

  7. FE Categorical Exclusions | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    8, 2011 CX-006459: Categorical Exclusion Determination Analytical Physics - Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08082011 Location(s): Albany, Oregon...

  8. CX-012619: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Chromatography and Analytical Sensor Measurements CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41799 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  9. CX-007587: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Gas Chromatography CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/29/2011 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  10. CX-009202: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Port Angeles Substation Equipment Additions CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 09/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  11. CX-012791: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Grizzly Captain Jack Transmission Line Access Road Acquisition CX(s) Applied: B1.24Date: 41935 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  12. CX-010772: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Water Security Test Bed (WSTB) CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/17/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  13. CX-012706: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Radiochemistry Laboratory (RCL) Supply Intake Filter Housing CX(s) Applied: B2.5Date: 41858 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  14. CX-012433: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Computer Simulation and Prototype Construction and Testing CX(s) Applied: A9Date: 41878 Location(s): GeorgiaOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  15. CX-008571: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Project Blue Energy CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 06/20/2012 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  16. CX-009442: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Cutters Grove, Anoka CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.19 Date: 07/31/2012 Location(s): Minnesota Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  17. FE Categorical Exclusions | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Investigation of Cathode Electrocatalytic Activity using Surfaced Engineered Thin Film Samples CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09082011 Location(s): Pittsburgh,...

  18. CX-009543: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sopogy Subcontract CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.15 Date: 11/28/2012 Location(s): Hawaii Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  19. CX-012195: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Alfalfa Substation Control House Replacement CX(s) Applied: B4.11 Date: 05/02/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  20. CX-012469: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Gas Analysis Services CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41876 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  1. CX-012512: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Amber Kinetics Flywheel Energy Storage Demonstration CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41848 Location(s): CaliforniaOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  2. CX-008215: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Small Hydropower Research and Development Technology Project CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 04/03/2012 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  3. CX-012666: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Carib Energy (USA) LLC CX(s) Applied: B5.7Date: 05/30//2014 Location(s): FloridaOffices(s): Fossil Energy

  4. CX-012434: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Low Cost Titanium Casting Technology CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41878 Location(s): OhioOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  5. CX-008700: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Natapoc Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 06/12/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  6. CX-010727: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dayton Tap Line Retirement CX(s) Applied: B4.10 Date: 08/13/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  7. CX-011173: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Yaak Substation Transformer Replacement CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 09/18/2013 Location(s): Montana Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  8. CX-008204: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Energize Missouri HUG Finch CX(s) Applied: B5.19 Date: 03/23/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  9. CX-008203: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Energize Missouri HUG Demoret CX(s) Applied: B5.19 Date: 03/23/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  10. CX-008241: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Energize Missouri HUG Teter CX(s) Applied: B5.19 Date: 05/15/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  11. CX-008205: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Energize Missouri HUG Weaver CX(s) Applied: B5.19 Date: 03/23/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  12. CX-009132: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Landfill Gas Utilization Plant CX(s) Applied: B5.21 Date: 08/02/2012 Location(s): New York Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  13. CX-010618: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Midwest Region Alternative Fuels Project CX(s) Applied: 0 Date: 07/19/2013 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  14. CX-008438: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Biogas Reconditioning Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 06/27/2012 Location(s): Nevada Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  15. CX-008282: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Biogas Reconditioning Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/01/2012 Location(s): Nevada Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  16. CX-010339: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Flight's End Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 05/20/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  17. CX-012311: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Accelerator Test Facility II CX(s) Applied: B3.10 Date: 05/28/2014 Location(s): New York Offices(s): Brookhaven Site Office

  18. CX-007866: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    SunShot Massachusetts CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): Massachusetts Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  19. CX-012570: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Install Elevated Fire Water Storage Tank CX(s) Applied: B2.5Date: 41862 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  20. CX-012231: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mica Peak Radio Station upgrade CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 06/09/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  1. CX-009850: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pittsburgh Nanomaterials Preparation Lab CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/29/2013 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  2. CX-011534: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Grays River Confluence Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 11/08/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  3. CX-009418: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Electron Beam Melting CX(s) Applied: None applied. Date: 10/30/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Kansas City Site Office

  4. CX-012656: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    North Bend Communication Site Engine Generator Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41848 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  5. CX-010195: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Polymer Synthesis Lab - Modification CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04/15/2013 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  6. CX-007779: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Routine Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  7. CX-009159: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Montana Formaul State Energy Program CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 09/06/2012 Location(s): Montana Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  8. CX-007522: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Crane Removal Project CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 12/15/2011 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Y-12 Site Office

  9. CX-012645: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Wenatchee District 2014 Transmission Line Maintenance - Multiple Lines CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41862 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  10. CX-010237: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pittsburgh Green Innovators Synergy Center CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 02/28/2013 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  11. CX-007650: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Control Room Consolidation CX(s) Applied: B2.2 Date: 12/29/2011 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  12. CX-012653: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Holcomb-Naselle #1 Access Road Improvements CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41855 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  13. CX-012643: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Chehalis-Covington #1 Access Roads CX(s) Applied: B1.13Date: 41865 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  14. CX-012641: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mossy Rock-Chehalis #1 Access Road Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41865 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  15. CX-010514: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Center for Nanoscale Energy CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/24/2013 Location(s): North Dakota Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  16. CX-007778: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Support Buildings CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  17. CX-010091: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Power Line Configuration 2013-1 CX(s) Applied: B4.13 Date: 04/15/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  18. CX-010398: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Power Line Configuration CX(s) Applied: B4.13 Date: 04/25/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  19. CX-009312: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pecan Street Smart Grid Extension Service CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/30/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  20. CX-100159 Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Proposed Rulemaking for Energy Conservation Standards for Commercial and Industrial Pumps RIN: 1904-AC54 CX(s) Applied: B5.1

  1. CX-011065: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Midwest Region Alternative Fuels Project CX(s) Applied: A1 Date: 08/29/2013 Location(s): Kansas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  2. CX-011788: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    I-75 Green Corridor Project CX(s) Applied: A1 Date: 02/10/2014 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  3. CX-007497: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Clean Energy Coalition - Michigan Green Fleets CX(s) Applied: A1 Date: 12/06/2011 Location(s): Michigan Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  4. CX-011712: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Midwest Region Alternative Fuels Project CX(s) Applied: A1 Date: 01/08/2014 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  5. CX-010938: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Midwest Region Alternative Fuels Project CX(s) Applied: A1 Date: 09/17/2013 Location(s): Kansas, Kansas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  6. CX-011271: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Idaho Petroleum Reduction Leadership Project CX(s) Applied: A1 Date: 09/30/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  7. CX-012722: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Test Reactor Area (TRA)-653 Conference Room Modifications CX(s) Applied: B1.15Date: 41829 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  8. CX-012189: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Microbial Laboratory Analysis CX(s) Applied: B3.12 Date: 05/06/2014 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Argonne Site Office

  9. CX-010797: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Serration Behavior of High Entropy Alloys CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/14/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  10. CX-012632: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    LURR 20140456 - Salmon Creek Avenue Pathway Project CX(s) Applied: B4.9Date: 41885 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  11. CX-009203: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ross Maintenance Headquarters Project CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 09/19/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  12. CX-012788: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bio-Aviation Fuel LCA with GREET CX(s) Applied: B5.15Date: 41906 Location(s): IllinoisOffices(s): Argonne Site Office

  13. CX-011069: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Induction Furnace Melting CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/29/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  14. CX-010768: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    ZIRCEX Nuclear Fuel Dissolution Testing CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/12/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  15. CX-012002: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Raver-Covington Conductor Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 04/24/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  16. CX-007795: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Easement Acquisition, Carroll County, Arkansas CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 02/07/2011 Location(s): Arkansas Offices(s): Southwestern Power Administration

  17. CX-008161: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Prosser Hatchery Backup Generator Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 04/16/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  18. CX-012472: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Technology Integration Program CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.11Date: 41873 Location(s): OhioOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  19. CX-007613: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Next Generation Ultra Lean Burn Powertrain CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 01/10/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  20. CX-012200: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Determination of Excess Real Property CX(s) Applied: B1.36 Date: 05/01/2014 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Legacy Management

  1. CX-012495: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Building 6 Stack Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41855 Location(s): West VirginiaOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  2. CX-007428: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ralls Independent School District CX(s) Applied: B5.18 Date: 12/20/2011 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  3. CX-007423: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Highland Independent School District CX(s) Applied: B5.18 Date: 12/13/2011 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  4. CX-007426: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sharyland Independent School District CX(s) Applied: B5.16 Date: 12/13/2011 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  5. CX-010150: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Celilo Fiber System CX(s) Applied: B4.7 Date: 04/15/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  6. CX-009587: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    City of Houston, Texas CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/12/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  7. CX-012228: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Deer Park Substation Connection Modifications CX(s) Applied: B4.11 Date: 06/17/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  8. CX-012333: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Support Buildings CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 06/03/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  9. CX-006646: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Restoration South of 54-TPX-10CX(s) Applied: B6.1Date: 02/09/2010Location(s): Casper, WyomingOffice(s): RMOTC

  10. CX-003164: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-003164: Categorical Exclusion Determination Optimization of Biomass Production Across a Landscape CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 07262010...

  11. CX-012796: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Big Eddy-Redmond #1 Wood Pole Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41919 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  12. CX-008471: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Tree Planting Initiative - Rebuild Western Mass CX(s) Applied: A1 Date: 06/08/2012 Location(s): Massachusetts Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  13. CX-012803: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sacajawea Substation Expansion and Upgrade CX(s) Applied: B4.6Date: 41912 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  14. CX-012665: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Cheniere Marketing, LLC CX(s) Applied: B5.7Date: 06/04/2014 Location(s): Multiple LocationsOffices(s): Fossil Energy

  15. CX-011707: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Laser Nanoparticle Lab CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/15/2014 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  16. CX-008341: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    A-6 Office Building CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 04/19/2012 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program

  17. CX-011177: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hebo Substation Access Road Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 09/13/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  18. CX-006491: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-006491: Categorical Exclusion Determination Photovoltaic Manufacturing Consortium CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09012011 Location(s): Florida...

  19. CX-007873: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Exclusion Determination CX-007873: Categorical Exclusion Determination Northeast Photovoltaic Regional Training Provider CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.14 Date: 01272012...

  20. CX-007867: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Exclusion Determination CX-007867: Categorical Exclusion Determination Northeast Photovoltaic Regional Training Provider CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.16 Date: 01272012...

  1. CX-012640: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Lexington-Longview #1 Access Road Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41865 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  2. CX-011189: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Naselle Ridge Emergency Generator Replacement CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 08/26/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  3. CX-011237: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Lightspeed Networks Inc. Fiber Installation CX(s) Applied: B4.9 Date: 10/24/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  4. CX-010756: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Solar Utility Network Deployment Acceleration CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 08/15/2013 Location(s): Virginia Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  5. CX-011102: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    American Solar Transformation Initiative CX(s) Applied: A11 Date: 08/09/2013 Location(s): California Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  6. CX-012790: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Haystack Butte Radio Site Land Acquisition CX(s) Applied: B1.24Date: 41939 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  7. CX-010426: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Vista View Fields Land Acquisition CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 06/19/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  8. CX-008250: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Geotechnical Core Drilling for USGS 138 CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 04/18/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  9. CX-010699: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    North Boulevard Annex Lease Termination CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 07/11/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  10. CX-008251: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    International Way Office Building Lease Termination CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 03/21/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  11. CX-007793: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Jonesboro Maintenance Facility Additions CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 05/10/2011 Location(s): Arkansas Offices(s): Southwestern Power Administration

  12. CX-007794: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Grandview, Arkansas Interconnection CX(s) Applied: B4.12 Date: 04/08/2011 Location(s): Arkansas Offices(s): Southwestern Power Administration

  13. CX-007798: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Springfield Maintenance Garage CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 12/08/2010 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Southwestern Power Administration

  14. CX-009704: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pasco Land Acquisition CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 12/17/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  15. CX-008684: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Metaline Radio Station Upgrade Project CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 07/11/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  16. CX-008989: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    State Energy Program CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 08/27/2012 Location(s): Kansas Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  17. CX-012728: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    BHP-3 Offsite Bump Repair CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41885 Location(s): TexasOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  18. CX-009786: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Beck Road Substation Meter Installation CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 01/07/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  19. CX-010742: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Integrated Simulation Development and Decision Support CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/15/2013 Location(s): California Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  20. CX-012730: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace West Hackberry Radio Tower CX(s) Applied: B1.19Date: 41880 Location(s): LouisianaOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  1. CX-012531: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Distributed Wireless Antenna Sensors for Boiler Condition CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41836 Location(s): CaliforniaOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  2. CX-012539: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Distributed Wireless Antenna Sensors for Boiler Condition CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41836 Location(s): TexasOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  3. CX-010019: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Iodine Speciation CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/28/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  4. CX-009295: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Energy Regional Innovation Cluster CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/05/2012 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  5. CX-001856: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Exclusion Determination Rural Cooperative Geothermal Development Electric and Agriculture CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 04282010 Location(s): Paisley, Oregon Office(s): Energy...

  6. CX-010763: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CX-010763: Categorical Exclusion Determination Nevada Desert Research Institute- Photovoltaic Installation CX(s) Applied: B5.16 Date: 07172013 Location(s): Nevada Offices(s):...

  7. CX-010258: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bangladesh Meteorological Instrumentation Installation CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 04/26/2013 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  8. CX-012482: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mid-Atlantic Regional Infrastructure Development Project CX(s) Applied: B5.22Date: 41862 Location(s): MarylandOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  9. CX-010057: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Eugene Substation Protective Relay Installation CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 01/29/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  10. CX-010338: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Eugene Substation Fiber Interconnection CX(s) Applied: B4.7 Date: 05/21/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  11. CX-010343: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bald Hill Farms Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 05/10/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  12. CX-011214: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sensitive Instrument Facility CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/10/2013 Location(s): Iowa Offices(s): Ames Site Office

  13. CX-012222: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Harney Substation Digital Communications Upgrade CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 06/30/2014 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  14. CX-008799: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Jack Case Showers Projects CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/04/2012 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Y-12 Site Office

  15. CX-008534: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Peter Wentz Geothermal CX(s) Applied: B5.19 Date: 05/23/2012 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  16. CX-012054: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Catalyst Synthesis CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 03/18/2014 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  17. CX-008691: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mason Substation Metering Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 06/25/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  18. CX-011538: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Ninemile Creek Lower Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 11/26/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  19. CX-011536: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Aeneans Creek Spring Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 11/25/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  20. CX-011537: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Wanacut Creek Upper Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 11/26/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  1. CX-010770: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Wildland Fire Chainsaw Training CX(s) Applied: B1.2 Date: 08/01/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  2. CX-010591: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    South Yamhill Floodplain Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 06/26/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  3. CX-012654: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Red Hills Property Acquisition Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25Date: 41850 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  4. CX-012224: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Coyote Creek Property Acquisition Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 06/25/2014 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  5. CX-012223: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Turtle Flats Property Acquisition Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 06/25/2014 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  6. CX-010028: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Flame Forming Proppants CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/17/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  7. CX-003703: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Determination Florida Hydrogen Initiative - Florida Institute of Technology (Interdisciplinary Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technology Academic Program) CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 09...

  8. CX-012463: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Reliable SOFC Systems CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6Date: 41877 Location(s): ConnecticutOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  9. CX-012561: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace Department of Energy Office Trailers CX(s) Applied: B1.15Date: 41871 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  10. CX-010578: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Celilo Converter Station Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B4.11 Date: 07/25/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  11. CX-012795: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    North Bonneville Substation 23- Kilovolt Line Retermination CX(s) Applied: B4.11Date: 41926 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  12. CX-008803: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Milling Machine Replacement Projects CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 05/14/2012 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Y-12 Site Office

  13. CX-012822: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Santiam-Toledo Structure 39/7 Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41876 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  14. CX-012716: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    General Scientific Infrastructure Support for University of Wisconsin CX(s) Applied: B1.31Date: 41844 Location(s): WisconsinOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  15. CX-012283: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    USC Autoclave CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/14/2014 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  16. CX-010587: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mariah Wind CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 07/03/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  17. CX-012583: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Biofuels Production Experiment CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41841 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  18. CX-007792: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Gore Substation Safety Lighting CX(s) Applied: B2.3 Date: 09/01/2011 Location(s): Oklahoma Offices(s): Southwestern Power Administration

  19. CX-007517: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    UPF Mock Wall Project CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/29/2011 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Y-12 Site Office

  20. CX-009630: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    ICP Routine Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 11/06/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  1. CX-012718: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Idaho State University Reactor Laboratory Modernization CX(s) Applied: B1.31Date: 41844 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  2. CX-011642: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pantex Lake Land Utilization CX(s) Applied: B1.11 Date: 11/05/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Pantex Site Office

  3. CX-008588: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    St. Petersburg Solar Pilot Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 07/19/2012 Location(s): Florida Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  4. CX-011667: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Generating Alginate Sorbents CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/11/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  5. CX-012317: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    High Performance Computing Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 06/16/2014 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  6. CX-012254: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hydro Research Foundation University Research Awards - Vanderbilt CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 05/28/2014 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  7. CX-012253: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hydro Research Foundation University Research Awards - OSU CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 05/27/2014 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  8. CX-012118: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hydro Research Foundation University Research Awards - Tufts CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 05/21/2014 Location(s): Georgia Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  9. CX-008724: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Rexburg Bus Lot Lease Termination CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 07/05/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  10. CX-009515: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Tide Creek Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 11/08/2012 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  11. CX-011634: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Closure Turf Installation CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 08/27/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Pantex Site Office

  12. CX-010689: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Generic CX Determination for Financial Assistance Awards CX(s) Applied: Unknown Date: 07/17/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Chicago Office

  13. CX-010342: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Luckiamute Meadows Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 05/15/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  14. CX-010532: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Various Demolition Jobs CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 06/07/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Fermi Site Office

  15. CX-011215: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Nepese Marsh Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 10/17/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Fermi Site Office

  16. CX-012810: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    St. Johns-Keeler Minor Access Road Improvement CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41901 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  17. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Western Area PowerAdministratio...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    2011 CX-006298: Categorical Exclusion Determination Interconnection of the Letcher to Mitchell 115 Kilovolt Transmission Line to Western's Letcher Substation CX(s) Applied: B4.11...

  18. CX-010951: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Automotive Technology Analysis CX(s) Applied: A8 Date: 09/17/2013 Location(s): Virginia Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  19. CX-010341: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Chandler Tap Line Reconductoring CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 05/17/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  20. CX-012498: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Advanced Light Extraction Structure for OLED Lighting CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41852 Location(s): MarylandOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  1. CX-007407: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Advanced Floating Turbine CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 12/07/2011 Location(s): Ohio Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  2. FE Categorical Exclusions | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    28, 2011 CX-006916: Categorical Exclusion Determination Combining Space Geodesy, Seismology, and Geochemistry for Monitoring Verification and Accounting of Carbon Dioxide CX(s)...

  3. CX-010241: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hydrogen Pathway Analyses CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 02/28/2013 Location(s): Virginia Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  4. CX-008701: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Spring Basin Wilderness Land Exchange CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 06/05/2012 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  5. CX-012807: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Action Substation Equipment Sale CX(s) Applied: B1.24Date: 41906 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  6. CX-009325: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Microbiology Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 10/01/2012 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  7. CX-011194: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Particle Physics Division Outback Garage CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 09/19/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Fermi Site Office

  8. CX-011250: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Determination Transforming Photovoltaic Installations Toward Dispatchable, Schedulable Energy Solutions CX(s) Applied: B3.6, B5.15 Date: 10172013 Location(s): Oregon...

  9. CX-008695: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Munro Control Center Expansion CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 06/21/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  10. CX-011239: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Security Upgrades at Multiple Substations CX(s) Applied: ? Date: 10/02/2013 Location(s): Oregon, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  11. CX-008146: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Advanced Formation Evaluator Tools (Haliburton) CX(s) Applied: B3.7 Date: 09/11/2011 Location(s): Wyoming Offices(s): RMOTC

  12. CX-012724: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) Electronic Message Board Installation CX(s) Applied: B1.7Date: 41830 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  13. CX-100160 Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Proposed Rulemaking for Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Dehumidifiers RIN: 1904-AC81 CX(s) Applied: B5.1

  14. CX-012812: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Chemawa-Salem #1 & #2 Access Road Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41893 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  15. CX-012636: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Woodward Meadows Property Acquisition Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25Date: 41876 Location(s): MontanaOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  16. Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CX(s) Applied: DOEEA-1914 National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Date: 072815 Location(s): CO Office(s): Golden Field Office July 21, 2015 CX-100313...

  17. CX-009005: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Henderson Solar Energy Project CX(s) Applied: B5.16 Date: 08/22/2012 Location(s): Nevada Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  18. CX-008973: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Petrography Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/01/2012 Location(s): West Virginia Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  19. CX-008545: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Solar Energy Evolution and Diffusion Studies CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 06/19/2012 Location(s): CX: none Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  20. CX-008926: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Texas Alternative Fuel Vehicle Pilot Program CX(s) Applied: A1 Date: 08/24/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  1. CX-008876: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Railroad Island Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 08/23/2012 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  2. CX-008884: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Rattlesnake Butte Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 08/13/2012 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  3. CX-011187: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minto Island Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 08/29/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  4. CX-009206: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Chahalpam Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 09/12/2012 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  5. CX-010589: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Nine Canyon Communication Tower Addition CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 07/01/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  6. CX-010590: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Kalispell Shunt Cap Addition Project CX(s) Applied: B4.11 Date: 07/01/2013 Location(s): Montana Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  7. CX-009617: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Gas Mass Spectrometry CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/07/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  8. CX-010124: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Chromatography / Mass Spectrometry CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 03/20/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  9. CX-010583: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Upper Jocko River Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 07/16/2013 Location(s): Montana Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  10. CX-100327 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CX-100327 Categorical Exclusion Determination Proposed Rulemaking for Energy Conservation Standards for Commercial Water Heating Equipment RIN: 1904-AD34 CX(s)...

  11. CX-012097: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Microgrid Demonstration Project CX(s) Applied: B5.15 Date: 03/24/2014 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  12. CX-007939: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Midwest Region Alternative Fuels Project CX(s) Applied: A1 Date: 02/16/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  13. CX-008729: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Reverse Osmosis System Removal CX(s) Applied: B1.26 Date: 06/25/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  14. CX-001016: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    16: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-001016: Categorical Exclusion Determination Sustainable Biomass Production Systems-GO88073 Renewal CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 03012010...

  15. CX-012776: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Catalyst Processing, KCP14-05 CX(s) Applied: NOT NOTEDDate: 41857 Location(s): MissouriOffices(s): Kansas City Site Office

  16. CX-012585: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Grit Blasting CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41835 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  17. CX-012606: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Preparing of Environmental Samples for Analysis CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41810 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  18. CX-012581: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Demolition of Outfall Sampling Station CX(s) Applied: B1.23Date: 41844 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  19. CX-012572: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    H-Area Vehicle Barrier Installation CX(s) Applied: B1.15Date: 41862 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  20. CX-012566: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Z-Area Fire Tank Painting CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41865 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  1. CX-012560: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    "Repaint Fire Tank 915-K CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 41871 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office"

  2. CX-012628: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Deactivation and Decommissioning of 711-L CX(s) Applied: B1.23Date: 41793 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  3. CX-012559: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Seal Access Plugs at 105-C CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41872 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  4. CX-012587: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    HB-Line Security Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41835 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  5. CX-012725: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Materials and Fuel Complex (MFC)-782 Fire Sprinkler Installation CX(s) Applied: B2.2Date: 41829 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  6. CX-012705: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC)-703 Fire Alarm Replacement CX(s) Applied: B2.2Date: 41858 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  7. CX-012729: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hydrogen Sulfide Scavenger BOA (Multiple) CX(s) Applied: B5.2Date: 41880 Location(s): LouisianaOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  8. CX-012789: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Building 440 CNM Clean Room Expansion CX(s) Applied: B3.15Date: 41906 Location(s): IllinoisOffices(s): Argonne Site Office

  9. CX-012563: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Roof repairs at 735-A CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41870 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  10. CX-011679: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Antifoam Degradation Testing CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/05/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  11. CX-012658: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Chief Joseph and Custer Substations Security Fence Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.11Date: 41843 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  12. CX-012371: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hawkins-Alvey Line Impairment CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 05/08/2014 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  13. CX-006681: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    New Drilling Location in Section 29CX(s) Applied: B3.1Date: 12/23/2009Location(s): Casper, WyomingOffice(s): RMOTC

  14. CX-012437: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    High Energy Density Lithium Battery CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41878 Location(s): New YorkOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  15. CX-008547: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    St. Petersburg Solar Pilot Project CX(s) Applied: B5.16 Date: 05/31/2012 Location(s): Florida Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  16. CX-007841: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Energy Efficiency Retrofits CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 01/30/2012 Location(s): Oklahoma Offices(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  17. CX-007837: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Energy Retrofits CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/01/2011 Location(s): Kentucky Offices(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  18. CX-007836: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Building Retrofits CX(s) Applied: B5.19 Date: 01/30/2012 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  19. CX-009711: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Tucannon River Substation Expansion Project CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 11/01/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  20. CX-002355: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-002355: Categorical Exclusion Determination Kansas City Power and Light (KCP&L) Green Impact Zone Smart Grid Demonstration CX(s) Applied:...

  1. CX-012110: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Cowlitz Falls Fish Facility Access Agreement Extension CX(s) Applied: A2 Date: 04/02/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  2. CX-009513: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Aquatic Invasive Mussels Monitoring CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 10/15/2012 Location(s): CX: none Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  3. CX-009707: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Alcoa Power Sales Contract CX(s) Applied: B4.1 Date: 12/04/2012 Location(s): Oregon, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  4. CX-012793: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    15-Minute Transmission Scheduling CX(s) Applied: B4.4, B4.5Date: 41933 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  5. CX-012519: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Amber Kinetics Flywheel Energy Storage Demonstration CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41848 Location(s): CaliforniaOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  6. CX-100245 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CX-100245 Categorical Exclusion Determination Hydrogen Adsorbents with High Volumetric Density: New Materials and System Projections Award Number: DE-EE0007046 CX(s) Applied: A9,...

  7. CX-011131: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Puget Sound Pilot Tidal Energy Project CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/13/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  8. CX-008556: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Haiti Renewable Resource Study CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 07/23/2012 Location(s): Haiti Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  9. CX-008543: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Colorado State Energy Plan 2012 CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 06/25/2012 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  10. CX-010658: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    CX-010658: Categorical Exclusion Determination Analytical Development Laser Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06172013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s):...

  11. CX-012708: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) Complex Training Trailer CX(s) Applied: B1.15Date: 41844 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  12. CX-012621: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace 730-2B Roof CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41799 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  13. CX-012622: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace roofing system at 702-F CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41799 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  14. CX-007957: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Geothermal Incentive Program CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 01/30/2012 Location(s): Connecticut Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  15. CX-009420: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Additive Manufacturing Using EOSINT M280 CX(s) Applied: None applied. Date: 10/30/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Kansas City Site Office

  16. CX-011110: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Advancements in Algal Biomass Yield CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/29/2013 Location(s): Hawaii Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  17. FE Categorical Exclusions | Department of Energy

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    FE Categorical Exclusions FE Categorical Exclusions RSS June 4, 2014 CX-011993: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cheniere Marketing, LLC CX(s) Applied: B5.7 Date: 06042014...

  18. CX-008234: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Whole Energy Glycerin Refinery CX(s) Applied: B5.15 Date: 04/20/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  19. CX-012620: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Grout Preparation CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41799 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  20. CX-009552: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Central Vermont Recovered Biomass Facility CX(s) Applied: B5.20 Date: 11/28/2012 Location(s): Vermont Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  1. CX-007382: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Compressed Natural Gas Manufacturing CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 10/26/2011 Location(s): Wisconsin Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  2. CX-012233: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Shed Acquisition at Kalispell Substation CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 06/09/2014 Location(s): Montana Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  3. CX-010734: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Covington District Culvert Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/22/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  4. CX-009018: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    State Energy Program - Tennessee CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 08/23/2012 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  5. CX-008999: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Program Year 2012 Formula Grants CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 08/22/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  6. CX-009027: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Town of Franklin Weatherization Retrofits CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/20/2012 Location(s): Vermont Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  7. CX-007856: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sacramento Regional Energy Alliance CX(s) Applied: B5.23 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  8. CX-007880: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Evergreen State Solar Partnership CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  9. CX-007853: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Arizona Rooftop Challenge (ARC) CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): Arizona Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  10. CX-007893: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    SunShot Massachusetts CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 02/10/2012 Location(s): Massachusetts Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  11. CX-007858: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Southwest Solar Transformation Initiative CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  12. CX-007859: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Developing Solar Friendly Communities CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  13. CX-007882: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Wisconsin Solar Market Transformation CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): Wisconsin Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  14. CX-007869: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Solar Ready KC CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  15. CX-010581: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Little Shell Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 07/16/2013 Location(s): Montana Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  16. CX-007833: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Energy Retrofits CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 11/29/2011 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  17. CX-010582: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Spring Creek Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 07/16/2013 Location(s): Montana Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  18. CX-010767: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    University Boulevard Water Meter Installation CX(s) Applied: B2.2 Date: 08/14/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  19. CX-011625: Categorical Exclusion Determinationc

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    9103 Second Floor Refurbishment CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/05/2013 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Y-12 Site Office

  20. CX-011184: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Salmon Creek Pond Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 08/29/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  1. CX-005670: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CX-005670: Categorical Exclusion Determination Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy System Development of the Aquantis 2.5 Megawatt Ocean-Current Electricity Generation Device CX(s) ...

  2. CX-008546: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    National Open-ocean Energy Laboratory CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 06/20/2012 Location(s): Florida Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  3. CX-010869: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Nauticas Research Program CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/07/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Argonne Site Office

  4. CX-011165: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Heavy Mineral Separation CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/07/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  5. CX-008797: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Coal Pile Basin Project CX(s) Applied: B1.29 Date: 06/04/2012 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Y-12 Site Office

  6. CX-004247: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Exclusion Determination CX-004247: Categorical Exclusion Determination Carolina Blue Skies Initiative CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1 Date: 10142010 Location(s): Indian Trail,...

  7. CX-010113: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Compression Stress Relaxometer CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 03/28/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  8. CX-012028: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    High Temperature Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04/21/2014 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  9. CX-011408: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Wyandotte Integrated Renewable Energy Strategy 2 CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 11/20/2013 Location(s): Michigan Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  10. CX-012436: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    System Reliability Model for SSL Luminaires CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41878 Location(s): AlabamaOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  11. CX-011531: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Targhee Substation Land Acquisition CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 11/05/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  12. CX-008984: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    State Energy Program CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 08/29/2012 Location(s): Florida Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  13. CX-007864: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Broward County SOLAR Project CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): Florida Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  14. CX-006211: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Exclusion Determination Missouri Independent Energy Efficiency Program: Henniges Automotive - Process Air Compressor Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 07182011 Location(s):...

  15. CX-003861: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Exclusion Determination CX-003861: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) DE-EE0000727 City of Prairie Village CX(s)...

  16. CX-011822: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Light Willow Demonstration CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/09/2014 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  17. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Golden Field Office | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Categorical Exclusion Determination U.S. Department of Energy Collegiate Entrepreneurship Prize Award Number: TBD FOA CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 12222014 Location(s): CO...

  18. CX-010515: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Energy Efficiency Public Service Campaign CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 06/14/2013 Location(s): New York Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  19. CX-012122: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    OCGen Module Mooring Project CX(s) Applied: B5.25 Date: 04/29/2014 Location(s): Maine Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  20. CX-009635: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    INTEC U-233 Waste Stream Disposition CX(s) Applied: NO CX GIVEN Date: 12/15/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  1. CX-009398: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Domestic Source Recovery CX(s) Applied: B2.6 Date: 11/01/2012 Location(s): New Mexico Offices(s): Los Alamos Site Office

  2. CX-011401: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minto Lodge Rehabilitation CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 11/19/2013 Location(s): Alaska Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  3. CX-010435: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    De Moss Substation Expansion CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 06/03/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  4. CX-100400 Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Corrosion-resistant non-carbon electrocatalyst supports for PEFCs Award Number: DE- EE-0007272 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6

  5. CX-011188: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Thurston Hills Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 08/28/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  6. CX-010422: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mt. Richmond Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 06/10/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  7. CX-010730: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Paisley Geothermal Integration CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 08/09/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  8. CX-009210: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Silver Butte Fiber Burial Project CX(s) Applied: B.47 Date: 08/28/2012 Location(s): Montana, Montana Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  9. CX-011244: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hardeson Small Generator Integration CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 09/25/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  10. CX-008883: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Indian Creek Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 08/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  11. CX-011676: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Office Trailer Relocation CX(s) Applied: B1.22 Date: 12/09/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  12. CX-011990: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Determination CX-011990: Categorical Exclusion Determination Decherd Electric Vehicle Motor Project CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 06202011 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s):...

  13. CX-010148: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Merritt Radio Station Upgrade CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 04/18/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  14. CX-008535: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    King County Biogas and Nutrient Reduction CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 05/22/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  15. CX-012817: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bell Maintenance Headquarters Access Road Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41890 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  16. CX-010433: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Memaloose Meadows Land Acquisition CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 06/04/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  17. CX-012809: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    LURR 20140313 City of Vancouver Sewer Lateral CX(s) Applied: B4.9Date: 41906 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  18. CX-012655: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Acquisition of Access Road Easements CX(s) Applied: B1.24Date: 41849 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  19. CX-012651: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    LURR20140464 - Spencer May - Fence Construction CX(s) Applied: B4.9Date: 41858 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  20. CX-012637: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    LURR 20140521 - David King - Sewer Line Installation CX(s) Applied: B4.9Date: 41876 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  1. CX-010157: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Fairmount Substation Equipment Acquisition CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 03/27/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  2. CX-011535: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    East Grangeville Substation Sale CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 11/14/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  3. CX-010733: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Port of Morrow Land Acquisition CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 07/31/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  4. CX-008875: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bingen Substation Sectionalizing Switches Disposition CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 08/27/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  5. CX-008168: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Snohomish High School Field Improvements CX(s) Applied: B4.9 Date: 03/20/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  6. CX-010586: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Umatilla Electric Cooperative CX(s) Applied: B4.9 Date: 07/03/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  7. CX-012648: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bonneville Power House-Alcoa #2 Tower Relocation CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41857 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  8. CX-012818: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    La Pine-Chiloquin Wood Pole Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41887 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  9. CX-010588: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Chehalis Substation Tree Clearing CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/02/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  10. CX-006213: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Determination CX-006213: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act: Conducting a 3D Converted Shear Wave Project to Reduce Exploration Risk at Wister, California CX(s)...

  11. CX-009419: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Magnetic Pulser CX(s) Applied: None applied. Date: 10/30/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Kansas City Site Office

  12. CX-011116: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sunpath SANFAB CX(s) Applied: B5.16 Date: 08/09/2013 Location(s): Nevada Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  13. CX-011369: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Relief Valve Test Stand Relocation CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 10/24/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  14. CX-011564: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Excess Facilities Deactivation and Demolition CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 11/05/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  15. CX-008766: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Determination CX-008766: Categorical Exclusion Determination Asphalt Repair and Concrete Work Activities at the Grand Junction, Colorado, Disposal Site CX(s) Applied: B1.3...

  16. CX-003841: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CX-003841: Categorical Exclusion Determination Demolition and Removal of the X-230J9 North Environmental Sampling Building CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 08262010...

  17. CX-007571: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pulaski County - Wastewater CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/29/2011 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  18. CX-012647: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Kalispell District 2014 Transmission Line Maintenance - Multiple Lines CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41862 Location(s): MontanaOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  19. CX-012798: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Davis Creek Tap Wood Pole Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41915 Location(s): CaliforniaOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  20. CX-010437: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Rocky Ridge Radio Station Upgrade CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 05/31/2013 Location(s): Montana Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  1. CX-010160: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sundial Island Transmission Tower Relocation CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 03/20/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  2. CX-012038: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Deepwater Reverse-Circulation Primary Cementing CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 04/17/2014 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  3. CX-008307: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Deepwater Reverse-Circulation Primary Cementing CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 04/25/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  4. CX-010717: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Moodys Radio Tower Land Acquisition CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 07/15/2013 Location(s): Oklahoma Offices(s): Southwestern Power Administration

  5. CX-007417: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Shift CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/21/2011 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  6. CX-012474: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Refractories/Ceramics Project CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41870 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  7. CX-009272: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Building 94 Facade Restoration CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 09/10/2012 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  8. CX-012816: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Rogue-Gold Beach Access Road Improvement CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41890 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  9. CX-009542: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Solar Parks Project CX(s) Applied: B5.16 Date: 11/09/2012 Location(s): Florida Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  10. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: A1 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... June 3, 2014 CX-012298: Categorical Exclusion Determination Wisconsin Biofuels Retail Availability Improvement Network (BRAIN) CX(s) Applied: A1, A9 Date: 06032014 Location(s): ...

  11. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: B5.22 | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    ... June 3, 2014 CX-012297: Categorical Exclusion Determination Wisconsin Biofuels Retail Availability Improvement Network (BRAIN) - E85 Station Installation CX(s) Applied: B5.22 Date: ...

  12. CX-007082: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Determination CX-007082: Categorical Exclusion Determination Provide Telecommunications Cable to Buildings 6750 and 6753 CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 06092011 Location(s):...

  13. CX-012787: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Nationwide AFV Emergency Responder, Recovery, Reconstruction & Investigation CX(s) Applied: B5.15Date: 41906 Location(s): IllinoisOffices(s): Argonne Site Office

  14. CX-008706: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Tunk Mountain Radio Station Upgrade CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 05/30/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  15. CX-009198: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ross Transformer Oil Terminal Upgrade CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 09/24/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  16. CX-011686: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ross Communication Tower Fiber Installation CX(s) Applied: B4.7 Date: 01/15/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  17. CX-012808: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    LURR 20140504 Ross Substation Comcast Fiber Installation CX(s) Applied: B4.9Date: 41906 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  18. CX-010155: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Augspurger Radio Tower Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 04/03/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  19. CX-008683: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Shaniko Radio Station Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 07/11/2012 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  20. CX-009698: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sale of Lakeside Radio Station CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 12/27/2012 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  1. CX-011190: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Alberton Communication Site Construction CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 08/26/2013 Location(s): Montana Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  2. Use of sulfide-containing liquors for removing mercury from flue gases

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Nolan, Paul S.; Downs, William; Bailey, Ralph T.; Vecci, Stanley J.

    2006-05-02

    A method and apparatus for reducing and removing mercury in industrial gases, such as a flue gas, produced by the combustion of fossil fuels, such as coal, adds sulfide ions to the flue gas as it passes through a scrubber. Ideally, the source of these sulfide ions may include at least one of: sulfidic waste water, kraft caustic liquor, kraft carbonate liquor, potassium sulfide, sodium sulfide, and thioacetamide. The sulfide ion source is introduced into the scrubbing liquor as an aqueous sulfide species. The scrubber may be either a wet or dry scrubber for flue gas desulfurization systems.

  3. Word Pro - Untitled1

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    9 Table 11.6 Installed Nameplate Capacity of Fossil-Fuel Steam-Electric Generators With Environmental Equipment, 1985-2010 (Megawatts) Year Coal Petroleum and Natural Gas Total 1 Particulate Collectors Cooling Towers Flue Gas Desulfurization (Scrubbers) Total 2 Particulate Collectors Cooling Towers Flue Gas Desulfurization (Scrubbers) Total 2 Particulate Collectors Cooling Towers Flue Gas Desulfurization (Scrubbers) Total 2 1985 302,056 120,591 56,955 304,706 36,054 28,895 65 62,371 338,110

  4. Compliance testing of Grissom AFB Central Heating Plant coal-fired boilers 3, 4, and 5, Grissom AFB, Indiana. Final report, 29 January-15 February 1989

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Garrison, J.A.

    1989-06-01

    At the request of HQ, SAC/SGPB source compliance testing (particulate and visible emissions) of boilers 3, 4, and 5 in the Grissom AFB Central Heating Plant was accomplished 29 Jan-15 Feb 89. The survey was conducted to determine compliance with regards to Indiana Administrative Code, Title 325 - Air Pollution Control Board, Article 5, Opacity Regulations, and Article 6, Particulate Regulations. Boiler 3 was tested through scrubber B, Boiler 4 through scrubber A, and Boiler 5 through scrubber B and the bypass stack. Results indicate that each boiler met applicable visible and particulate emission standards.

  5. Apparatus for control of mercury

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Downs, William (Alliance, OH); Bailey, Ralph T. (Uniontown, OH)

    2001-01-01

    A method and apparatus for reducing mercury in industrial gases such as the flue gas produced by the combustion of fossil fuels such as coal adds hydrogen sulfide to the flue gas in or just before a scrubber of the industrial process which contains the wet scrubber. The method and apparatus of the present invention is applicable to installations employing either wet or dry scrubber flue gas desulfurization systems. The present invention uses kraft green liquor as a source for hydrogen sulfide and/or the injection of mineral acids into the green liquor to release vaporous hydrogen sulfide in order to form mercury sulfide solids.

  6. Use of sulfide-containing liquors for removing mercury from flue gases

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Nolan, Paul S. (North Canton, OH); Downs, William (Alliance, OH); Bailey, Ralph T. (Uniontown, OH); Vecci, Stanley J. (Alliance, OH)

    2003-01-01

    A method and apparatus for reducing and removing mercury in industrial gases, such as a flue gas, produced by the combustion of fossil fuels, such as coal, adds sulfide ions to the flue gas as it passes through a scrubber. Ideally, the source of these sulfide ions may include at least one of: sulfidic waste water, kraft caustic liquor, kraft carbonate liquor, potassium sulfide, sodium sulfide, and thioacetamide. The sulfide ion source is introduced into the scrubbing liquor as an aqueous sulfide species. The scrubber may be either a wet or dry scrubber for flue gas desulfurization systems.

  7. bia-cemkiln | netl.doe.gov

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Comprehensive Report to Congress Comprehensive Report to Congress on the Clean Coal Technology Program: Cement Kiln Flue Gas Recovery Scrubber PDF-1.5MB (Nov 1989) Prepared by ...

  8. Flue gas desulfurization/denitrification using metal-chelate additives

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Harkness, John B. L. (Naperville, IL); Doctor, Richard D. (Glen Ellyn, IL); Wingender, Ronald J. (Deerfield, IL)

    1986-01-01

    A method of simultaneously removing SO.sub.2 and NO from oxygen-containing flue gases resulting from the combustion of carbonaceous material by contacting the flue gas with an aqueous scrubber solution containing an aqueous sulfur dioxide sorbent and an active metal chelating agent which promotes a reaction between dissolved SO.sub.2 and dissolved NO to form hydroxylamine N-sulfonates. The hydroxylamine sulfonates are then separated from the scrubber solution which is recycled.

  9. Flue gas desulfurization/denitrification using metal-chelate additives

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Harkness, J.B.L.; Doctor, R.D.; Wingender, R.J.

    1985-08-05

    A method of simultaneously removing SO/sub 2/ and NO from oxygen-containing flue gases resulting from the combustion of carbonaceous material by contacting the flue gas with an aqueous scrubber solution containing an aqueous sulfur dioxide sorbent and an active metal chelating agent which promotes a reaction between dissolved SO/sub 2/ and dissolved NO to form hydroxylamine N-sulfonates. The hydroxylamine sulfonates are then separated from the scrubber solution which is recycled. 3 figs.

  10. Geothermal Development and the Use of Categorical Exclusions Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (Presentation)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Levine, A.; Young, K. R.

    2014-09-01

    The federal environmental review process under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) can be complex and time consuming. Currently, a geothermal developer may have to complete the NEPA process multiple times during the development of a geothermal project. One mechanism to reduce the timeframe of the federal environmental review process for activities that do not have a significant environmental impact is the use of Categorical Exclusions (CXs), which can exempt projects from having to complete an Environmental Assessment or Environmental Impact Statement. This study focuses primarily on the CX process and its applicability to geothermal exploration. In this paper, we: Provide generalized background information on CXs, including previous NEPA reports addressing CXs, the process for developing CXs, and the role of extraordinary circumstances; Examine the history of the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) geothermal CXs; Compare current CXs for oil, gas, and geothermal energy; Describe bills proposing new statutory CXs; Examine the possibility of standardizing geothermal CXs across federal agencies; and Present analysis from the Geothermal NEPA Database and other sources on the potential for new geothermal exploration CXs. As part of this study, we reviewed Environmental Assessments (EAs) conducted in response to 20 geothermal exploration drilling permit applications (Geothermal Drilling Permits or Notices of Intents) since the year 2001, the majority of which are from the last 5 years. All 20 EAs reviewed for this study resulted in a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). While many of these FONS's involved proponent proposed or federal agency required mitigation, this still suggests it may be appropriate to create or expand an exploration drilling CX for geothermal, which would have a significant impact on reducing geothermal exploration timelines and up-front costs. Ultimately, federal agencies tasked with permitting and completing environmental reviews for geothermal exploration drilling activities and/or legislative representatives are the responsible parties to discuss the merits and implementation of new or revised CXs for geothermal development.

  11. Geothermal Development and the Use of Categorical Exclusions (Poster)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Levine, A.; Young, K. R.

    2014-09-01

    The federal environmental review process under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) can be complex and time consuming. Currently, a geothermal developer may have to complete the NEPA process multiple times during the development of a geothermal project. One mechanism to reduce the timeframe of the federal environmental review process for activities that do not have a significant environmental impact is the use of Categorical Exclusions (CXs), which can exempt projects from having to complete an Environmental Assessment or Environmental Impact Statement. This study focuses primarily on the CX process and its applicability to geothermal exploration. In this paper, we Provide generalized background information on CXs, including previous NEPA reports addressing CXs, the process for developing CXs, and the role of extraordinary circumstances; Examine the history of the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) geothermal CXs;Compare current CXs for oil, gas, and geothermal energy; Describe bills proposing new statutory CXs; Examine the possibility of standardizing geothermal CXs across federal agencies; and Present analysis from the Geothermal NEPA Database and other sources on the potential for new geothermal exploration CXs. As part of this study, we reviewed Environmental Assessments (EAs) conducted in response to 20 geothermal exploration drilling permit applications (Geothermal Drilling Permits or Notices of Intents) since the year 2001, the majority of which are from the last 5 years. All 20 EAs reviewed for this study resulted in a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). While many of these FONSI's involved proponent proposed or federal agency required mitigation, this still suggests it may be appropriate to create or expand an exploration drilling CX for geothermal, which would have a significant impact on reducing geothermal exploration timelines and up-front costs. Ultimately, federal agencies tasked with permitting and completing environmental reviews for geothermal exploration drilling activities and/or legislative representatives are the responsible parties to discuss the merits and implementation of new or revised CXs for geothermal development.

  12. Duct injection technology prototype development: Nozzle development Subtask 4.1, Atomizer specifications for duct injection technology. Topical report 8

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1992-02-01

    Babcock & Wilcox has conducted a program to identify atomizers appropriate for successful in-duct injection of humidification water and lime slurries. The purpose of this program was to identify and quantify atomizer spray and performance criteria that affect the operations and reliability of the in-duct SO{sub 2} removal process, and compare commercially available atomizers to these criteria.

  13. Syngas to Synfuels Process Development Unit Final Scientific/Technical Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Brown, Robert C.

    2012-03-30

    The process described is for the gasification of 20 kg/h of biomass (switchgrass) to produce a syngas suitable for upgrading to Fischer-Tropsch (FT) liquid fuels (gas, diesel, waxes, etc.). The gas stream generated from gasification is primarily composed of carbon monoxide (CO), hydrogen (H2), carbon dioxide (CO2), steam (H2O), and methane (CH4), but also includes tars, particulate matter, ammonia (NH3), hydrogen cyanide (HCN), hydrogen chloride (HCl), hydrogen sulfide ( H2S), carbonyl sulfide (COS), etc. as contaminants. The gas stream passes through an array of cleaning devices to remove the contaminants to levels suitable for FT synthesis of fuels/chemicals. These devices consist primarily of an oil scrubber (to remove tars and remaining particulates), sulfur scrubber (to remove sulfur compounds), and a wet scrubber (to remove NH3, HCl and remaining water soluble contaminants). The ammonia and oil scrubbers are absorption columns with a combination of random and structured packing materials, using water and oil as the adsorption liquids respectively. The ammonia scrubber performed very well, while operating the oil scrubber proved to be more difficult due to the nature of tar compounds. The sulfur scrubber is a packed bed absorption device with solid extrudates of adsorbent material, primarily composed of ZnO and CuO. It performed well, but over a limited amount of time due to fouling created by excess tar/particulate matter and oil aerosols. Overall gas contaminants were reduced to below 1 ppm NH3, and less than 1 ppm collective sulfur compounds.

  14. CX-009194: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    (0674-1610) TVN Systems, Inc. - Hydrogen/Bromine Electrical Energy Storage System CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/06/2012 Location(s): Kansas, Tennessee Offices(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy

  15. CX-100006: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Community-Based PPA Investment Platform & Partnership Program Award Number: DE-EE0006699 CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Solar Energy Technologies Date: 08/27/2014 Location(s): Pennsylvania Office(s): Golden Field Office

  16. CX-009793: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Strategic Petroleum Reserve Site Workover Support Activities, 2016-2020 CX(s) Applied: B5.12 Date: 01/07/2013 Location(s): CX: none Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  17. CX-009212: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Replace Three Wood Poles-In-Kind at Bryan Mound West Gate CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/23/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  18. CX-008344: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Clean, Seal, and Paint West Hackberry Buildings RW MCC 392, Substation 390 and MCC 317 CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 05/08/2012 Location(s): Louisiana Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  19. CX-010329: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Thermal-Chemical Decomposition of Graphite CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04/04/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  20. CX-011510: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Thermal-Chemical Decomposition of Graphite CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 10/17/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  1. CX-008704: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Grand Coulee-Bell No. 3 Double Circuit 230 Kilovolt Transmission Line Reconductoring Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 05/31/2012 Location(s): Washington, Washington, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  2. CX-010137: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Correct Obstruction in the Sprinkler System on Level 3 of HB-Line CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 03/11/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  3. CX-012694: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Periodic MaterialBased Seismic Base Isolators for Small Modular Reactors-University of Houston CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41864 Location(s): TexasOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  4. CX-010282: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Low Temperature Nitrous Oxide Storage and Reduction Using Engineered Materials CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/14/2013 Location(s): New Jersey Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  5. CX-011795: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ultra Efficient CHHP using High Temperature Fuel Cell CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 02/06/2014 Location(s): Connecticut Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  6. CX-008559: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    New Hampshire Formula Grant for State Energy Program CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 06/25/2012 Location(s): New Hampshire Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  7. CX-008023: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Material Conservation Programs CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6, B5.1 Date: 11/16/2011 Location(s): Nationwide Offices(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  8. CX-008629: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Remove Roof Over the North-east Spill Basin 235-F CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 06/18/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  9. CX-007438: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Routine Activities at the Casper, Wyoming, Calibration Model Facility CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B1.24 Date: 12/13/2011 Location(s): Wyoming Offices(s): Legacy Management

  10. CX-009619: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Dissolution of Sludge Constituents in Glycolate-Containing 2H Evaporator Rad Feed Solution CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/07/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  11. CX-010023: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Installing Vent/Drain on Inlet Headers of 292-H Recycle Vessel Vent Fans CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 01/28/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  12. CX-010122: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Metal Recycling Storage Pad CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 03/20/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  13. CX-007439: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Routine Maintenance Activities at the George West, Texas, Calibration Model Facility CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B1.24 Date: 12/13/2011 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Legacy Management

  14. CX-007822: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Routine Activities at the Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research (LEHR), California, Site CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B3.1 Date: 02/09/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): Legacy Management

  15. CX-009054: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Preparation of Used Lead for Off-Site Shipment for Recycle CX(s) Applied: B6.8 Date: 08/02/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  16. CX-009296: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Advanced Computational and Modeling Research for the Electric Power System CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 09/04/2012 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  17. CX-009919: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Borough of Fort Lee, New Jersey Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 01/31/2013 Location(s): New Jersey Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  18. Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    of High-Efficiency, Low-Cost Building-Integrated Photovoltaic Shingles Using Monocrystalline Silicon Thin Film Solar Cells Award Number: DE-EE0005436 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6...

  19. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Golden Field Office | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    of High-Efficiency, Low-Cost Building-Integrated Photovoltaic Shingles Using Monocrystalline Silicon Thin Film Solar Cells Award Number: DE-EE0005436 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6...

  20. CX-009901: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    25A1152 - 1366 Direct Water: Enabling Terawatt Photovoltaics CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/18/2009 Location(s): Massachusetts Offices(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy

  1. CX-000884: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Establishing Waste Acceptance Criteria for DeconGel 1101CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 02/16/2010Location(s): Aiken, South CarolinaOffice(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office

  2. CX-009259: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Water Management in Mature Oil Fields Using Advanced Particle Gels CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 09/12/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  3. CX-009260: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Water Management in Mature Oil Fields Using Advanced Particle Gels CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 09/12/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  4. CX-008266: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Improved Mobility Control in Carbon Dioxide Enhanced Recovery Using SPI Gels CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/23/2012 Location(s): Mississippi Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  5. CX-008831: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Algaecide Use at Wastewater Treatment Facility - Amendment 01 CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/07/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Pantex Site Office

  6. CX-009107: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Xylene Measurement for Saltstone Antifoams CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/27/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  7. CX-012328: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    PNNL Projects Involving Routine Maintenance in the 300 Area CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/03/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  8. CX-009297: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Optimization of Pressurized Oxy-Combustion with Flameless Reactor - Phase I CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/31/2012 Location(s): Massachusetts, Italy Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  9. CX-007804: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Flagstaff-Pinnacle Peak #2 Conductor Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 11/07/2011 Location(s): Arizona Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration-Desert Southwest Region

  10. CX-009585: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Feasibility Study and Design of "Brightfield" Solar Farm CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.16 Date: 12/12/2012 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  11. CX-011635: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Routine Administrative, Maintenance, and Operating Activities at Pantex Plant for 2014 and2015 CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 09/16/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Pantex Site Office

  12. CX-011632: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Guard Tower Power and Fiber Reroute CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B1.27 Date: 06/05/2013 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Y-12 Site Office

  13. CX-011624: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Disposition Excess Equipment from Alpha 1 CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 11/21/2012 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Y-12 Site Office

  14. CX-003082: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Demolition of Buildings 11-10 and 11-30CX(s) Applied: B1.23Date: 07/07/2010Location(s): Amarillo, TexasOffice(s): NNSA-Headquarters, Pantex Site Office

  15. CX-100039: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Reducing Soft Costs Through Hardware Innovation CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/04/2014 Location(s): Hawaii Offices(s): Golden Field Office Technology Office: Solar Energy Technologies Award Number: DE-EE0006689

  16. CX-007389: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Advances in Hydrogeochemical Indicators for the Discovery of New Geothermal Resources in the Great Basin CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 12/21/2011 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  17. CX-006589: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Vermont Biofuels Initiative: Borderview Farm CDP-09CX(s) Applied: B3.1, B5.1Date: 08/29/2011Location(s): Alburgh, VermontOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

  18. CX-009569: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    2012 Illinois State Energy Program Formula Award - Modification CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1, B5.19 Date: 12/19/2012 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  19. CX-008423: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    New Jersey-City-Passaic CX(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.1 Date: 06/25/2012 Location(s): New Jersey Offices(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  20. CX-012048: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Saltstone Facility Groundwater Investigation and Well Installation CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 03/27/2014 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  1. CX-011619: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Muddy Pass-Walden 69-kilovolt Transmission Line Danger Tree Management CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 11/21/2013 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration-Rocky Mountain Region

  2. CX-100266 Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Envision Charlotte Project Award Number: DE-EE0007066 CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Bioenergy Technologies Office Date: 06/03/2015 Location(s): NC Office(s): Golden Field Office

  3. CX-011243: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Driscoll-Naselle #1 Tower Relocation CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 09/26/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  4. CX-011172: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Brasada-Harney Number 1 Access Road Maintenance Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 09/18/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  5. CX-012804: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pilot Butte-La Pine #1 Wood Pole Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41912 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  6. CX-012719: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Development of Capabilities to Study the Thermodynamics of Nuclear Energy Related Infrastructure at the Utah Nuclear Engineering Program University of Utah CX(s) Applied: B1.31Date: 41844 Location(s): UtahOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  7. CX-100452 Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Solar Training Network and Solar Ready Vets Award Number: DE-EE0007319 CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Solar Energy Technologies Office Date: 01/19/2016 Location(s): DC Office(s): Golden Field Office

  8. CX-011589: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Risk Assessment of Structural Integrity of Transportation Casks CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/04/2013 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  9. CX-011697: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Tonto Apache Community Clean Energy Project CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.1, B5.16 Date: 01/02/2014 Location(s): Arizona Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  10. CX-011225: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    West Hackberry RWIS Recycle Valve Upgrade CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 10/15/2013 Location(s): Louisiana Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  11. CX-010665: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Non-Rad and Rad Microtrac Particle Size Analyzers CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/12/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  12. CX-009304: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Planning of a Marine Methane Hydrate Pressure Coring Program CX(s) Applied: A1, A9 Date: 08/31/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  13. CX-011813: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Characterization and Analyses of Core Samples From 105-C Disassembly Basin CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/30/2014 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  14. CX-007654: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Install Formed Core Sampler in Saltstone Disposal Facility Vault 2 CX(s) Applied: B6.3 Date: 12/09/2011 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  15. CX-012388: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Subcontractor Repair of Roof Leaks 108-1K CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 05/13/2014 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  16. CX-011828: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Characterization and Analyses of Core Samples from the 105-C Disassembly Basin CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/06/2014 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  17. CX-100289 Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Solar Electric Deployment on Tribal Facilities Award Number: DE-EE0006948 CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Tribal Energy Program Date: 06/04/2015 Location(s): WI Office(s): Golden Field Office

  18. CX-100269 Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Soboba Band of Luiseo Indians Award Number: DE-EE0006950 CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.16 Tribal Energy Program Date: 06/04/2015 Location(s): CA Office(s): Golden Field Office

  19. CX-012166: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Perform Hydrant Flushing, Maintenance, Prove Curb Valves, and Flow Test in C-Area CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 04/23/2014 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  20. CX-001372: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    On-Dock Rail Straddle Portal Prototype Project, Y580CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 03/10/2010Location(s): Aiken, South CarolinaOffice(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office