National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for in-duct scrubber cxs

  1. HYDROFLUORIC ACID SCRUBBER SYSTEMS

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    PANESKO JV; MERRITT HD

    2011-05-18

    Each year over a million gallons of water are used to scrub hydrogen fluoride (HP) vapors from waste off-gas streams. Use of other potential scrubber solutions such as potassium hydroxide (KOH), aluminum nitrate nonahydrate (ANN), and monobasic aluminum nitrate (monoban) would result in significant volume reductions. A laboratory study was initiated to (1) demonstrate the effectiveness of these scrubber solutions to sorb HF, (2) determine if unexpected reactions occurred at flowsheet conditions, and (3) determine the consequences of deviation from flowsheet conditions. Caustic or aluminum scrubber solutions remove hydrogen fluoride from off-gas streams. Solids which appear with aluminum could be avoided by heating the scrubber solution.

  2. Scrubber myths and realities

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1995-01-01

    This article addresses common misperceptions about flue gas desulfurization systems to provide a realistic appraisal of this capable control technology. Commonly known as scrubbers, flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems are a highly efficient and reliable means of removing SO[sub 2] as well as particulate matter, hydrochloric and other air toxics. Scrubbers, which have been used for 25 years, are not only commercially proven, but are the standard by which new technology is judged. This standard, however, continues to rise as scrubber cost-effectiveness, reliability, waste recycling and efficiency as steadily improved over the last several years.

  3. Dry scrubber with integral particulate collection device

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Johnson, D.J.; Myers, R.B.; Tonn, D.P.

    1993-06-01

    A dry scrubber/particulate collection device is described comprising: (a) a dry scrubber component having a flue gas entrance, a spray zone, and a flue gas exit; (b) a particulate collection component downstream of said flue gas exit and capable of being isolated utilizing one or more isolation dampers located between said dry scrubber component and said particulate collection component, said dry scrubber component and said particulate collection component together comprising integral parts of a single assembly; and, (c) control means for controlling the flow of flue gas through said particulate collection component of said assembly.

  4. Liquid film target impingement scrubber

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    McDowell, William J.; Coleman, Charles F.

    1977-03-15

    An improved liquid film impingement scrubber is provided wherein particulates suspended in a gas are removed by jetting the particle-containing gas onto a relatively small thin liquid layer impingement target surface. The impingement target is in the form of a porous material which allows a suitable contacting liquid from a pressurized chamber to exude therethrough to form a thin liquid film target surface. The gas-supported particles collected by impingement of the gas on the target are continuously removed and flushed from the system by the liquid flow through each of a number of pores in the target.

  5. Cement Kiln Flue Gas Recovery Scrubber Project

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    National Energy Technology Laboratory

    2001-11-30

    The Cement Kiln Flue Gas Recovery Scrubber Project was a technical success and demonstrated the following: CKD can be used successfully as the sole reagent for removing SO2 from cement kiln flue gas, with removal efficiencies of 90 percent or greater; Removal efficiencies for HCl and VOCs were approximately 98 percent and 70 percent, respectively; Particulate emissions were low, in the range of 0.005 to 0.007 grains/standard cubic foot; The treated CKD sorbent can be recycled to the kiln after its potassium content has been reduced in the scrubber, thereby avoiding the need for landfilling; The process can yield fertilizer-grade K2SO4, a saleable by-product; and Waste heat in the flue gas can provide the energy required for evaporation and crystallization in the by-product recovery operation. The demonstration program established the feasibility of using the Recovery Scrubber{trademark} for desulfurization of flue gas from cement kilns, with generally favorable economics, assuming tipping fees are available for disposal of ash from biomass combustion. The process appears to be suitable for commercial use on any type of cement kiln. EPA has ruled that CKD is a nonhazardous waste, provided the facility meets Performance Standards for the Management of CKD (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1999d). Therefore, regulatory drivers for the technology focus more on reduction of air pollutants and pollution prevention, rather than on treating CKD as a hazardous waste. Application of the Recovery Scrubbe{trademark} concept to other waste-disposal operations, where pollution and waste reductions are needed, appears promising.

  6. Gas scrubbers. (Latest citations from the US Patent database). Published Search

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1993-07-01

    The bibliography contains selected patents concerning fabrication techniques and the utilization of gas scrubbers used in gas purification. Topics include methods of improving gas stream flow through the scrubber, gas sampling, materials recovery techniques, and the treatment of scrubber sludge. Wet and dry scrubbers, and foam devices are among the equipment types considered. Considerable attention is given to scrubber utilization in air pollution control operations. (Contains a minimum of 196 citations and includes a subject term index and title list.)

  7. Supporting Calculations For Submerged Bed Scrubber Condensate Disposal Preconceptual Study

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Pajunen, A. J.; Tedeschi, A. R.

    2012-09-18

    This document provides supporting calculations for the preparation of the Submerged Bed Scrubber Condensate Disposal Preconceptual Study report The supporting calculations include equipment sizing, Hazard Category determination, and LAW Melter Decontamination Factor Adjustments.

  8. Assessment of Industrial VOC Gas-Scrubber Performance

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Saito, H

    2004-02-13

    Gas scrubbers for air-pollution control of volatile organic compounds (VOC) cover a wide range of technologies. In this review, we have attempted to evaluate the single-pass scrubber destruction and removal efficiencies (DREs) for a range of gas-scrubber technologies. We have focused primarily on typical industrial DREs for the various technologies, typical problems, and any DRE-related experiential information available. The very limited literature citations found suggest significant differences between actual versus design performance in some technologies. The potentially significant role of maintenance in maintaining DREs was also investigated for those technologies. An in-depth portrayal of the entire gas scrubbing industry is elusive. Available literature sources suggest significant differences between actual versus design performance in some technologies. Lack of scrubber system maintenance can contribute to even larger variances. ''Typical'' industrial single-pass performance of commonly used VOC gas scrubbers generally ranged from {approx}80 to 99%. Imperfect solid and/or liquid particulates capture (possibly as low as 95% despite design for 99+% capture efficiency) can also lead to VOC releases. Changing the VOC composition in the gas stream without modifying scrubber equipment or operating conditions could also lead to significant deterioration in attainable destruction and removal efficiencies.

  9. High efficiency, low cost scrubber upgrades

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Klingspor, J.S.; Walters, M.

    1998-07-01

    ABB introduced the LS-2 technology; a limestone based wet FGD system, which is capable of producing high purity gypsum from low grade limestone, in late 1995. Drawing from 30,000 MWe of worldwide wet FGD experience, ABB has incorporated several innovations in the new system designed to reduce the overall cost of SO{sub 2} compliance. Collectively, these improvements are referred to as LS-2. The improvements include a compact high efficiency absorber, a simple dry grinding system, a closed coupled flue gas reheat system, and a tightly integrated dewatering system. The compact absorber includes features such a high velocity spray zone, significantly improved gas-liquid contact system, compact reaction tank, and a high velocity mist eliminator. The LS-2 system is being demonstrated at Ohio Edison's Niles Plant at the 130 MWe level, and this turnkey installation was designed and erected in a 20-month period. At Niles, all of the gypsum is sold to a local wallboard manufacturer. Many of the features included in the LS-2 design and demonstrated at Niles can be used to improve the efficiency and operation of existing systems including open spray towers and tray towers. The SO{sub 2} removal efficiency can be significantly improved by installing the high efficiency LS-2 style spray header design and the unique wall rings. The absorber bypass can be eliminated or reduced by including the LS-2 style high velocity mist eliminator. Also, the LS-2 style spray header design combined with wall rings allow for an increase in absorber gas velocity at a maintained or improved performance without the need for costly upgrades of the absorber recycle pumps. the first upgrade using LS-2 technology was done at CPA's Coal Creek Station (2{times}545 MWe). The experience form the scrubber upgrade at Coal Creek is discussed along with operating results.

  10. Study of in-duct spray drying using condensation aerosol

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Chen, W.J.R.; Chang, S.M.; Adikesavalu, R. )

    1992-06-01

    Sulfur removal efficiency of in-duct spray drying is limited by sorbent content and surface properties of the sorbent-water aerosol. It was the purpose of this study to improve the sulfur removal efficiency for in-duct spray drying by injecting condensation aerosol instead of conventional dispersion aerosol. The program was composed of three phases. In Phase I, a novel pulsed fluid bed feeder was developed and was used to feed hydrated lime for subsequent experiments. A small condensation aerosol generator was then built, which produces a lime-water condensation aerosol by condensing steam on lime particles. The results show that novel lime-water aerosols less than 10 microns were generated. The central task in Phase II was to simulate experimentally in-duct spray drying using condensation aerosols and compare the results with those using dispersion aerosols reported in the literature. A small entrained-flow reactor was constructed to simulate an in-duct spray dryer. The condensation aerosol was then introduced to the reactor at various approach to saturation temperature, calcium/sulfur stoichiometry and sulfur dioxide concentration for desulfurization study. The results show that we have improved the sulfur removal efficiency for in-duct spray drying to 90 percent or above. Thus we have met and exceeded the stated project goal of 70 percent sulfur removal. A comprehensive computer code was employed to calculate sulfur removal efficiency in Phase III.

  11. Dry scrubber reduces SO sub 2 in calciner flue gas

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Brown, G.W. ); Roderick, D. ); Nastri, A. )

    1991-02-18

    This paper discusses the installation of a dry sulfur dioxide scrubber for an existing petroleum coke calciner at its Fruita, Colo., refinery. The dry scrubbing process was developed by the power industry to help cope with the acid rain problem. It is the first application of the process in an oil refinery. The process could also remove SO{sub 2} from the flue gas of a fluid catalytic cracker, fluid coker, or other refinery sources.

  12. Mercury removal in utility wet scrubber using a chelating agent

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Amrhein, Gerald T.

    2001-01-01

    A method for capturing and reducing the mercury content of an industrial flue gas such as that produced in the combustion of a fossil fuel or solid waste adds a chelating agent, such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or other similar compounds like HEDTA, DTPA and/or NTA, to the flue gas being scrubbed in a wet scrubber used in the industrial process. The chelating agent prevents the reduction of oxidized mercury to elemental mercury, thereby increasing the mercury removal efficiency of the wet scrubber. Exemplary tests on inlet and outlet mercury concentration in an industrial flue gas were performed without and with EDTA addition. Without EDTA, mercury removal totaled 42%. With EDTA, mercury removal increased to 71%. The invention may be readily adapted to known wet scrubber systems and it specifically provides for the removal of unwanted mercury both by supplying S.sup.2- ions to convert Hg.sup.2+ ions into mercuric sulfide (HgS) and by supplying a chelating agent to sequester other ions, including but not limited to Fe.sup.2+ ions, which could otherwise induce the unwanted reduction of Hg.sup.2+ to the form, Hg.sup.0.

  13. Separation of Flue-Gas Scrubber Sludge into Marketable Products

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1998-02-28

    The reduction of sulfur oxides from high sulfur coal burning utility companies has resulted in the production of huge quantities of wet flue-gas desulfurization scrubber sludge. A typical 400 MW power station burning a coal containing 3.5% sulfur by weight and using a limestone absorbent would produce approximately 177,000 tons (dry weight) of scrubber sludge per year. This brownish colored, finely divided material contains calcium sulfite (CaSO{sub 3} {center_dot} 1/2 H{sub 2}O), calcium sulfate (CaSO{sub 4} {center_dot} 2H{sub 2}O), unreacted limestone (CaCO{sub 3}), and various other impurities such as fly-ash and iron oxide particles. The physical separation of the components of scrubber sludge would result in the re-use of this material. The primary use would be conversion to a highly pure synthetic gypsum. This technical report concentrates on the effect of baffle configuration on the separation of calcium sulfite/sulfate from limestone. The position of the baffles as they related to the feed inlet, and the quantity of the baffles were examined. A clean calcium sulfite/sulfate (less than 2.0% limestone by weight) was achieved with the combination of water-only cyclone and horizontally baffled column.

  14. Separation of flue-gas scrubber sludge into marketable products

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kawatra, S.K.; Eisele, T.C.

    1997-08-31

    A tremendous amount of wet flue-gas desulfurization scrubber sludge (estimated 20 million metric tons per year in the US) is currently being landfilled at a huge cost to utility companies. Scrubber sludge is the solid precipitate produced during desulfurization of flue-gas from burning high sulfur coal. The amount of this sludge is expected to increase in the near future due to ever increasing governmental regulation concerning the amount of sulfur emissions. Scrubber sludge is a fine, grey colored powder that contains calcium sulfite hemihydrate (CaSO{sub 3} {center_dot} 1/2H{sub 2}), calcium sulfate dihydrate (CaSO{sub 4} {center_dot} 2H{sub 2}O), limestone (CaCO{sub 3}), silicates, and iron oxides. This material can continue to be landfilled at a steadily increasing cost, or an alternative for utilizing this material can be developed. This study explores the characteristics of a naturally oxidized wet flue-gas desulfurization scrubber sludge and uses these characteristics to develop alternatives for recycling this material. In order for scrubber sludge to be used as a feed material for various markets, it was necessary to process it to meet the specifications of these markets. A physical separation process was therefore needed to separate the components of this sludge into useful products at a low cost. There are several physical separation techniques available to separate fine particulates. These techniques can be divided into four major groups: magnetic separation, electrostatic separation, physico-chemical separation, and density-based separation. The properties of this material indicated that two methods of separation were feasible: water-only cycloning (density-based separation), and froth flotation (physico-chemical separation). These processes could be used either separately, or in combination. The goal of this study was to reduce the limestone impurity in this scrubber sludge from 5.6% by weight to below 2.0% by weight. The resulting clean calcium

  15. Cyprus Amax develops a practical dry diesel scrubber

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Fiscor, S.

    1995-06-01

    Underground diesel engines have gained popularity in the United States, especially in coal operations with longwalls. These engines provide the power needed during longwall moves and when hauling supplies to the various mechanized mining units. However, they also have inherent problems, particularly with the exhaust scrubbing devices. Two concerns must be addressed when considering underground diesel scrubbers: the environment and safety. Environmental concerns focus on the diesel engines exhaust emissions, which pose potential health risks to the miners sharing the common environment. Safety concerns involve aspects that pose a fire or ignition hazard from CH{sub 4}, coal dust, or spilled fuels. During late 1992, the first prototype, retrofitted to an Eimco 975 mantrip, was placed at the Shoshone mine. The Wyoming mine, with steep gradients, is one of Cyprus Amas`s more difficult operations. This was the first water-jacketed, manifold-and-catalyst scrubber installed on a Caterpiller (Cat) 3304 diesel engine underground. The dry heat exchanger is a simple, yet effective, two-pass, tube-and-shell heat exchanger. It is designed to be compact with minimal back pressure. While developing the dry heat exchanger, the designers focused on finding a stabilization rate of the unpreventible sooting process inside the tubes. Since manual cleaning was out of the question, an on-board internal cleaning system was created.

  16. Ammonia scrubber testing during IDMS SRAT and SME processing. Revision 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Lambert, D.P.

    1995-04-28

    This report summarizes results of the Integrated DWPF (Defense Waste Processing Facility) Melter System (IDMS) ammonia scrubber testing during the PX-7 run (the 7th IDMS run with a Purex type sludge). Operation of the ammonia scrubber during IDMS Sludge Receipt and Adjustment Tank (SRAT) and Slurry Mix Evaporator (SME) processing has been completed. The ammonia scrubber was successful in removing ammonia from the vapor stream to achieve NH3 concentrations far below the 10 ppM vapor exist design basis during SRAT processing. However, during SME processing, vapor NH3 concentrations as high as 450 ppM were measured exiting the scrubber. Problems during the SRAT and SME testing were vapor bypassing the scrubber and inefficient scrubbing of the ammonia at the end of the SME cycle (50% removal efficiency; 99.9% is design basis efficiency).

  17. Use of a polishing scrubber with a fluid bed boiler

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Toher, J.G.

    1996-12-31

    Once viewed as {open_quotes}competitive{close_quotes} technologies, the circulating dry scrubber (CDS){reg_sign} and circulating fluid bed (CFB) boiler are being used together to achieve enhanced performance with lower overall costs. The need to understand the synergy between these two technologies is driven by deregulation of the power industry and the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. Deregulation of power production in the US has spurred the growth of Independent Power Producers (IPP) who are responding to Industry`s demand for lower cost fuels, and close attention to annual operating costs. Utilities have to provide {open_quotes}open{close_quotes} access to their transmission lines allowing various IPP`s to connect with the end user. Industrial users can now choose from one of several sources of electricity with prices per kilowatt hour that are much lower than what they are currently being charged. The race is on to reduce power production costs and fuel can be the key in many cases. IPP`s and industry are banding together in very logical ways that can benefit both. Industry`s byproducts with heating value can be sold {open_quotes}over the fence{close_quotes} to an IPP who provides the industry with low cost steam and or electricity in return. However, many alternative lower cost fuels also have a higher emissions potential for criteria pollutants such a SO{sub 2}, NO{sub X}, particulate, or other emissions such as VOC`s and mercury which are more recently receiving attention. Cost effective management of these environmental issues must be an integral part of the project planning process. Three such cases are examined that involve the use of CFB`s with the CDS{reg_sign} as a polishing scrubber for SO{sub 2}. The first two cases involve repowering of existing facilities with petroleum coke as the fuel. The last case involves a new facility powered with low sulfur coal.

  18. Design procedure for sizing a submerged-bed scrubber for airborne particulate removal

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Ruecker, C.M.; Scott, P.A.

    1987-04-01

    Performance correlations to design and operate the submerged bed scrubber were developed for various applications. Structural design procedure outlined in this report focuses on off-gas scrubbing for HLW vitrification applications; however, the method is appropriate for other applications.

  19. Cross-flow versus counter-current flow packed-bed scrubbers: a mathematical analysis

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Fthenakis, V.M.

    1996-02-01

    Little is known about the mass transfer properties of packing media exposed to a crossflow of gas and liquid, whereas there is abundant information related to counter-current scrubbers. This paper presents a theoretical analysis of mass transfer and hydrodynamics in cross- flow packed bed scrubbers and compares those with information available for counter current towers, so that the first can be evaluated and/or designed based on data derived for the second. Mathematical models of mass transfer in cross-flow and counter- current packed bed scrubbers are presented. From those, one can predict the removal effectiveness of a crossflow scrubber from the number of transfer units (NTU) calculated for a similar counterflow operation; alternatively, when the removal effectiveness in counterflow is known, one can predict the corresponding NTU in crossflow.

  20. Value-Added Products From FGD Sulfite-Rich Scrubber Materials

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Vivak M. Malhotra

    2006-09-30

    Massive quantities of sulfite-rich flue gas desulfurization (FGD) scrubber materials are produced every year in the USA. In fact, at present, the production of wet sulfite-rich scrubber cake outstrips the production of wet sulfate-rich scrubber cake by about 6 million tons per year. However, most of the utilization focus has centered on FGD gypsum. Therefore, we have recently initiated research on developing new strategies for the economical, but environmentally-sound, utilization of sulfite-rich scrubber material. In this exploratory project (Phase I), we attempted to ascertain whether it is feasible to develop reconstituted wood replacement products from sulfite-rich scrubber material. In pursuit of this goal, we characterized two different wet sulfite-rich scrubber materials, obtained from two power plants burning Midwestern coal, for their suitability for the development of value-added products. The overall strategy adopted was to fabricate composites where the largest ingredient was scrubber material with additional crop materials as additives. Our results suggested that it may be feasible to develop composites with flexural strength as high as 40 MPa (5800 psi) without the addition of external polymers. We also attempted to develop load-bearing composites from scrubber material, natural fibers, and phenolic polymer. The polymer-to-solid ratio was limited to {le} 0.4. The formulated composites showed flexural strengths as high as 73 MPa (10,585 psi). We plan to harness the research outcomes from Phase I to develop parameters required to upscale our value-added products in Phase II.

  1. Value-Added Products from FGD Sulfite-Rich Scrubber Materials

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Vivak Malhotra

    2010-01-31

    According to the American Coal Ash Association, about 29.25 million tons of flue gas desulfurization (FGD) byproducts were produced in the USA in 2003. Out of 29.25 million tons, 17.35 million tons were sulfite-rich scrubber materials. At present, unlike its cousin FGD gypsum, the prospect for effective utilization of sulfite-rich scrubber materials is not bright. In fact, almost 16.9 million tons are leftover every year. In our pursuit to mitigate the liability of sulfite-rich FGD scrubber materials' disposal, we are attempting to develop value-added products that can commercially compete. More specifically, for this Innovative Concept Phase I project, we have the following objectives: to characterize the sulfite-rich scrubber material for toxic metals; to optimize the co-blending and processing of scrubber material and natural byproducts; to formulate and develop structural composites from sulfite-rich scrubber material; and to evaluate the composites' mechanical properties and compare them with current products on the market. After successfully demonstrating the viability of our research, a more comprehensive approach will be proposed to take these value-added materials to fruition.

  2. USDOE Innovative Clean Coal Technology Demonstration Project: Passamaquoddy Technology Recovery Scrubber{trademark}. Final report: Volume 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-02-01

    This Final Report provides available design, operational, and maintenance information, and marketing plans, on the Passamaquoddy Technology Recovery Scrubber{trademark} demonstration Project at the Dragon Products company`s cement plant at Thomaston, Maine. In addition, data on pollutant removal efficiencies and system economics are reviewed. The Recovery Scrubber was developed to simultaneously address the emission of acid gas pollutants and the disposal of alkaline solid waste at a cement plant. The process, however, has general application to other combustion processes including waste or fossil fuel fired boilers. Selected chemistry of the exhaust gas, (before and after treatment by the Recovery Scrubber), selected chemistry of the cement plant kiln baghouse dust catch (before and after treatment by the Recovery Scrubber), and Dragon cement plant economics are presented. current marketing efforts and potential markets for the Recovery Scrubber in several industries are discussed.

  3. Evaluating a heated metal scrubber's effectiveness in preventing ozone monitors' anomalous behavior during hot and humid ambient sampling

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Maddy, J.A.

    1999-07-01

    The purpose of this paper is to verify West Virginia's Wet/Dry test's prediction that Advanced Pollution Instrumentation's (API) ozone monitors, when using a heated metal scrubber in lieu of a standard MnO{sub 2} scrubber, would be made insensitive to sampling conditions which provoke anomalous behavior. Field trials involving two identical API model 400 ozone monitors, a Horiba APOA 360 ozone monitor, MnO{sub 2} scrubbers and API's optional heated metal scrubber would determine this. The heated metal scrubber succeeded in effectively eliminating the anomalous behavior. Evaluation results further verify the accuracy of West Virginia's Wet/Dry test. During the evaluation, a serendipitous event led to observations that confirmed previous observations by The Commonwealth of Virginia's monitoring staff, linking contamination of UV monitors' optics with anomalous behavior. Also, a partial summation of observations concerning ultraviolet ozone monitors' anomalous behavior, drawn from several sources, illustrates its complex nature.

  4. Parameters influencing the aerosol capture performance of the Submerged-Bed Scrubber

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Ruecker, C.M.; Scott, P.A.

    1987-04-01

    The Submerged-Bed Scrubber (SBS) is a novel air cleaning device that has been investigated by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) for scrubbing off gases from liquid-fed ceramic melters used to vitrify high-level waste (HLW). The concept for the SBS was originally conceived at Hanford for emergency venting of a reactor containment building. The SBS was adapted for use as a quenching scrubber at PNL because it can cool the hot melter off gas as well as remove over 90% of the airborne particles, thus meeting the minimum particulate decontamination factor (DF) of 10 required of a primary scrubber. The experiments in this study showed that the submicron aerosol DF for the SBS can exceed 100 under certain conditions. A conventional device, the ejector-venturi scrubber (EVS), has been previously used in this application. The EVS also adequately cools the hot gases from the melter while exhibiting aerosol removal DFs in the range of 5 to 30. In addition to achieving higher DFs than the EVS, however, the SBS has the advantage of being a passive system, better suited to the remote environment of an HLW processing system. The objective of this study was to characterize the performance of the SBS and to improve the aerosol capture efficiency by modifying the operating procedure or the design. A partial factorial experimental matrix was completed to determine the main effects of aerosol solubility, inlet off-gas temperature, inlet off-gas flow rate, steam-to-air ratio, bed diameter and packing diameter on the particulate removal efficiency of the SBS. Several additional experiments were conducted to measure the influence of the inlet aerosol concentration and scrubbing-water concentration on aerosol-removal performance. 33 refs., 17 figs., 14 tabs.

  5. Configuration Self-Scrubber for Xilinx Virtex-5QV FPGAs - Energy Innovation

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Portal Find More Like This Return to Search Configuration Self-Scrubber for Xilinx Virtex-5QV FPGAs Sandia National Laboratories Contact SNL About This Technology Publications: PDF Document Publication Market Sheet (162 KB) Technology Marketing Summary The Xilinx Virtex-5QV is a field programmable gate array (FPGA) designed for use in space applications. Despite radiation hardening of this particular FPGA, single-event upsets still occasionally corrupt the configuration memory of the

  6. Chemical Structure of Copper in Incineration Dry Scrubber and Bag Filter Ashes

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hsiao, M. C.; Wang, H. Paul; Peng, C. Y.; Huang, C. H.; Wei Yuling

    2007-02-02

    Speciation of copper in waste incineration fly ashes (dry scrubber (DS) and bag filter (BF)) has been studied by X-ray absorption near edge structural (XANES) spectroscopy in the present work. Copper species such as metallic Cu, CuO, Cu(OH)2, and a small amount of CuCO3 in the fly ashes could be distinguished by semi-quantitative analysis of the edge spectra. Interestingly, nano CuO (37%) were found in the BF fly ash, that might account for its relatively high leachability of copper.

  7. Oxidation of North Dakota scrubber sludge for soil amendment and production of gypsum. Final report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hassett, D.J.; Moe, T.A.

    1997-10-01

    Cooperative Power`s Coal Creek Station (CCS) the North Dakota Industrial Commission, and the US Department of Energy provided funds for a research project at the Energy and Environmental Research Center. The goals of the project were (1) to determine conditions for the conversion of scrubber sludge to gypsum simulating an ex situ process on the laboratory scale; (2) to determine the feasibility of scaleup of the process; (3) if warranted, to demonstrate the ex situ process for conversion on the pilot scale; and (4) to evaluate the quality and handling characteristics of the gypsum produced on the pilot scale. The process development and demonstration phases of this project were successfully completed focusing on ex situ oxidation using air at low pH. The potential to produce a high-purity gypsum on a commercial scale is excellent. The results of this project demonstrate the feasibility of converting CCS scrubber sludge to gypsum exhibiting characteristics appropriate for agricultural application as soil amendment as well as for use in gypsum wallboard production. Gypsum of a purity of over 98% containing acceptable levels of potentially problematic constituents was produced in the laboratory and in a pilot-scale demonstration.

  8. High-solids paint overspray aerosols in a spray painting booth: particle size analysis and scrubber efficiency

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Chan, T.L.; D'arcy, J.B.; Schreck, R.M.

    1986-07-01

    Particle size distributions of high-solids acrylic-enamel paint overspray aerosols were determined isokinetically in a typical downdraft spray painting booth in which a 7-stage cascade impactor was used. Three different industrial paint atomizers were used, and the paint aerosols were characterized before and after a paint both scrubber. The mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of a metallic basecoat and an acrylic clearcoat paint aerosol from air-atomized spray guns ranged from 4-12 ..mu..m and was dependent on atomization pressure. When the paint booth was operated under controlled conditions simulating those in a plant, the collection efficiency of paint overspray aerosols by a paint scrubber was found to be size dependent and decreased sharply for particles smaller than 2 ..mu..m to as low as 64% for clearcoat paint particles of 0.6 ..mu..m. Improvement in the overall particulate removal efficiency can be achieved by optimizing the spray painting operations so as to produce the least amount of fine overspray paint aerosols less than 2 ..mu..m. Maintaining a higher static pressure drop across the paint both scrubber also will improve scrubber performance.

  9. Study of in-duct spray drying using condensation aerosol. Final report, June 16, 1990--June 15, 1992

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Chen, W.J.R.; Chang, S.M.; Adikesavalu, R.

    1992-06-01

    Sulfur removal efficiency of in-duct spray drying is limited by sorbent content and surface properties of the sorbent-water aerosol. It was the purpose of this study to improve the sulfur removal efficiency for in-duct spray drying by injecting condensation aerosol instead of conventional dispersion aerosol. The program was composed of three phases. In Phase I, a novel pulsed fluid bed feeder was developed and was used to feed hydrated lime for subsequent experiments. A small condensation aerosol generator was then built, which produces a lime-water condensation aerosol by condensing steam on lime particles. The results show that novel lime-water aerosols less than 10 microns were generated. The central task in Phase II was to simulate experimentally in-duct spray drying using condensation aerosols and compare the results with those using dispersion aerosols reported in the literature. A small entrained-flow reactor was constructed to simulate an in-duct spray dryer. The condensation aerosol was then introduced to the reactor at various approach to saturation temperature, calcium/sulfur stoichiometry and sulfur dioxide concentration for desulfurization study. The results show that we have improved the sulfur removal efficiency for in-duct spray drying to 90 percent or above. Thus we have met and exceeded the stated project goal of 70 percent sulfur removal. A comprehensive computer code was employed to calculate sulfur removal efficiency in Phase III.

  10. Novel Adsorbent-Reactants for Treatment of Ash and Scrubber Pond Effluents

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Bill Batchelor; Dong Suk Han; Eun Jung Kim

    2010-01-31

    The overall goal of this project was to evaluate the ability of novel adsorbent/reactants to remove specific toxic target chemicals from ash and scrubber pond effluents while producing stable residuals for ultimate disposal. The target chemicals studied were arsenic (As(III) and As(V)), mercury (Hg(II)) and selenium (Se(IV) and Se(VI)). The adsorbent/reactants that were evaluated are iron sulfide (FeS) and pyrite (FeS{sub 2}). Procedures for measuring concentrations of target compounds and characterizing the surfaces of adsorbent-reactants were developed. Effects of contact time, pH (7, 8, 9, 10) and sulfate concentration (0, 1, 10 mM) on removal of all target compounds on both adsorbent-reactants were determined. Stability tests were conducted to evaluate the extent to which target compounds were released from the adsorbent-reactants when pH changed. Surface characterization was conducted with x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to identify reactions occurring on the surface between the target compounds and surface iron and sulfur. Results indicated that target compounds could be removed by FeS{sub 2} and FeS and that removal was affected by time, pH and surface reactions. Stability of residuals was generally good and appeared to be affected by the extent of surface reactions. Synthesized pyrite and mackinawite appear to have the required characteristics for removing the target compounds from wastewaters from ash ponds and scrubber ponds and producing stable residuals.

  11. FGD system capital and operating cost reductions based on improved thiosorbic scrubber system design and latest process innovations

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Smith, K.; Tseng, S.; Babu, M.

    1994-12-31

    Dravo Lime Company has operated the Miami Fort wet scrubber FGD pilot test unit since late 1989 and has continued in-house R&D to improve the economics of the magnesium-enhanced scrubbing process. Areas investigated include the scrubber configuration, flue gas velocity, spray nozzle type, droplet size, mist eliminator design, additives to inhibit oxidation, improved solids dewatering, etc. Also tested was the forced oxidation Thioclear process. The data gathered from the pilot plant and in-house programs were used to evaluate the capital and operating costs for the improved systems. These evaluations were made with eye towards the choices electric utilities will need to make in the near future to meet the Phase II emission limits mandated by the 1990 Clean Air Act. Some of the process modifications investigated, for example, the dewatering improvements apply to potential beneficial retrofit of existing FGD systems today.

  12. An experimental study of ammonia effects in a circulating dry scrubber process

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Neathery, J.K.; Schaefer, J.L.; Stencel, J.M.

    1995-06-01

    Utilities and independent power plants have increased needs to install both de-NO{sub x} and flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems on coal-fired boilers. Many de-NO{sub x} processes are based on the reduction of nitrogen oxides (NO{sub x}) by ammonia (NH{sub 3}) to elemental nitrogen (N{sub 2}). When applied upstream of a dry FGD system the issue of NH{sub 3} slippage, which may influence the scrubbing chemistry and/or the proficiency of the particulate collector`s performance, has become a concern. This paper addresses some of those concerns as they relate to the circulating dry scrubber (CDS) process. Fundamental aspects of sulfur capture and sorbent utilization under various Ca/S ratios and inlet NH{sub 3} concentrations were investigated with a 5.6 m{sup 3} min{sup -1} (200 ft{sup 3} min{sup -1}) pilot-scale CDS reactor. The objective of this research was to elucidate possible benefits (e.g., increased sulfur capture) and adverse side-effects (e.g., increased baghouse pressure drop) resulting from trace amounts of NH{sub 3} in the flue gas.

  13. EVALUATION OF AEROSOL EMISSIONS DOWNSTREAM OF AN AMMONIA-BASED SO2 SCRUBBER

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Dennis L. Laudal

    2002-04-01

    Depending on the size and type of boiler, the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments required specific reductions in SO{sub 2} emissions from coal-fired electric utilities. To meet these requirements, SO{sub 2} reduction strategies have included installing scrubbing technology, switching to a more expensive low-sulfur coal, or purchasing SO{sub 2} allowances. It is expected that over the next 10 years there will be an increase in the price of low-sulfur coals, but that higher-sulfur coal costs will remain the same. Technologies must be strongly considered that allow the use of high-sulfur fuels while at the same time meeting current and future SO{sub 2} emission limits. One such technology is the ammonia based flue gas desulfurization (FGD) (NH{sub 3}-based FGD) system manufactured by Marsulex Environmental Technologies (MET). The MET scrubber is a patented NH{sub 3}-based FGD process that efficiently converts SO{sub 2} (>95%) into a fertilizer product, ammonium sulfate ([NH{sub 4}]{sub 2}SO{sub 4}). A point of concern for the MET technology, as well as other FGD systems, is the emission of sulfuric acid/SO{sub 3} aerosols that could result in increased opacity at the stack. This is a direct result of firing high-sulfur fuels that naturally generate more SO{sub 3} than do low-sulfur coals. SO{sub 3} is formed during the coal combustion process. SO{sub 3} is converted to gaseous H{sub 2}SO{sub 4} by homogeneous condensation, leading to a submicron acid fume that is very difficult to capture in a dry electrostatic precipitator (ESP). The condensed acid can also combine with the fly ash in the duct and scale the duct wall, potentially resulting in corrosion of both metallic and nonmetallic surfaces. Therefore, SO{sub 3} in flue gas can have a significant impact on the performance of coal-fired utility boilers, air heaters, and ESPs. In addition to corrosion problems, excess SO{sub 3} emissions can result in plume opacity problems. Thus the Energy & Environmental Research

  14. Industry-Government-University Cooperative Research Program for the Development of Structural Materials from Sulfate-Rich FGD Scrubber Sludge

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    V. M. Malhotra; Y. P. Chugh

    2003-08-31

    The main aim of our project was to develop technology, which converts flue gas desulfurization (FGD) sulfate-rich scrubber sludge into value-added decorative materials. Specifically, we were to establish technology for fabricating cost effective but marketable materials, like countertops and decorative tiles from the sludge. In addition, we were to explore the feasibility of forming siding material from the sludge. At the end of the project, we were to establish the potential of our products by generating 64 countertop pieces and 64 tiles of various colors. In pursuit of our above-mentioned goals, we conducted Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements of the binders and co-processed binders to identify their curing behavior. Using our 6-inch x 6-inch and 4-inch x 4-inch high pressure and high temperature hardened stainless steel dies, we developed procedures to fabricate countertop and decorative tile materials. The composites, fabricated from sulfate-rich scrubber sludge, were subjected to mechanical tests using a three-point bending machine and a dynamic mechanical analyzer (DMA). We compared our material's mechanical performance against commercially obtained countertops. We successfully established the procedures for the development of countertop and tile composites from scrubber sludge by mounting our materials on commercial boards. We fabricated more than 64 pieces of countertop material in at least 11 different colors having different patterns. In addition, more than 100 tiles in six different colors were fabricated. We also developed procedures by which the fabrication waste, up to 30-weight %, could be recycled in the manufacturing of our countertops and decorative tiles. Our experimental results indicated that our countertops had mechanical strength, which was comparable to high-end commercial countertop materials and contained substantially larger inorganic content than the commercial products. Our moisture

  15. CHARACTERIZATION OF DWPF MELTER OFF-GAS QUENCHER AND STEAM ATOMIZED SCRUBBER DEPOSIT SAMPLES

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Zeigler, K; Ned Bibler, N

    2007-06-06

    This report summarizes the results from the characterization of deposits from the inlets of the primary off-gas Quencher and Steam Atomized Scrubber (SAS) in the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF), as requested by a technical assistance request. DWPF requested elemental analysis and compound identification to help determine the potential causes for the substance formation. This information will be fed into Savannah River National Laboratory modeling programs to determine if there is a way to decrease the formation of the deposits. The general approach to the characterization of these samples included x-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and chemical analysis. The following conclusions are drawn from the analytical results found in this report: (1) The deposits are not high level waste glass from the DWPF melt pool based on comparison of the compositions of deposits to the composition of a sample of glass taken from the pour stream of the melter during processing of Sludge Batch 3. (2) Chemical composition results suggest that the deposits are probably a combination of sludge and frit particles entrained in the off-gas. (3) Gamma emitters, such as Co-60, Cs-137, Eu-154, Am-241, and Am-243 were detected in both the Quencher and SAS samples with Cs-137 having the highest concentration of the gamma emitters. (4) No evidence existed for accumulation of fissile material (U-233, U-235, and Pu-239) relative to Fe in either deposit. (5) XRD results indicated both samples were primarily amorphorous and contained some crystals of the iron oxides, hematite and magnetite (Fe{sub 2}O{sub 3} and Fe(Fe{sub 2}O{sub 4})), along with sodium nitrate (NaNO{sub 3}). The other main crystalline compound in the SAS deposit was mercurous chloride. The main crystalline compound in the Quencher deposit was a uranium oxide compound. These are all sludge components. (6) SEM analysis of the Quencher deposit revealed crystalline uranium compounds within the sample

  16. Separation of flue-gas scrubber sludge into marketable products. Fourth year, first quarterly technical progress report, September 1, 1996--December 31, 1996 (Quarter No. 13)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kawatra, S.K.; Eisele, T.C.

    1996-12-01

    To reduce their sulfur emissions, many coal-fired electric power plants use wet flue-gas scrubbers. These scrubbers convert sulfur oxides into solid sulfate and sulfite sludge, which must then be disposed of. This sludge is a result of reacting limestone with sulfur dioxide to precipitate calcium sulfite and calcium sulfate. It consists of calcium sulfite (CaSO{sub 3}{circ}0.5H{sub 2}O), gypsum (CaSO{sub 4}{circ}2H{sub 2}O), and unreacted limestone (CaCO{sub 3}) or lime (Ca(OH)2), with miscellaneous objectionable impurities such as iron oxides, silicates, and magnesium, sodium, and potassium oxides or salts. These impurities prevent many sludges from being utilized as a replacement for natural gypsum, and as a result they must be disposed of in landfills, which presents a serious disposal problem. Knowledge of scrubber sludge characteristics is necessary for the development of purification technologies which will make it possible to directly utilize scrubber sludges rather than landfilling them. This project is studying the use of minimal-reagent froth flotation as the purification process, using the surface properties of the particles of unreacted limestone to remove them and their associated impurities from the material, leaving a purified calcium sulfite/gypsum product.

  17. Recovery and utilization of gypsum and limestone from scrubber sludge. Final technical report, September 1, 1992--August 31, 1993

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kawatra, S.K.; Eisele, T.C.

    1993-12-31

    Wet flue-gas desulfurization units in coal-fired power plants produce a large amount of sludge which must be disposed of, and which is currently landfilled in most cases. Increasing landfill costs are gradually forcing utilities to find other alternatives. In principle, this sludge can be used to make gypsum (CaSO{sub 4}{center_dot}2H{sub 2}O) for products such as plaster-of-Paris and wallboard, but only if impurities such as unreacted limestone and soluble salts are removed, and the calcium sulfite (CaSO{sub 3}) is oxidized to calcium sulfate (CaSO{sub 4}). This project investigated methods for removing the impurities from the sludge so that high-quality, salable gypsum products can be made. Two processes were studied, both separately and in combination: Water-only cycloning, and froth flotation. A large fraction (30--40%) of the impurities in the sludge are contained in the coarser, higher-density particles, which are readily removed using a water-only cyclone. Much of the remaining impurities are hydrophobic, and can be removed by froth flotation. A combined cyclone/froth flotation process has been found to be suitable for producing a high-purity product from scrubber sludge at low cost.

  18. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon emission profiles and removal efficiency by electrostatic precipitator and wetfine scrubber in an iron ore sintering plant

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Ettore Guerriero; Antonina Lutri; Rosanna Mabilia; Maria Concetta Tomasi Sciano; Mauro Rotatori

    2008-11-15

    A monitoring campaign of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans, polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and polychlorinated biphenyl was carried out in an Italian iron ore sintering plant by sampling the combustion gases at the electrostatic precipitator (ESP) outlet, at the Wetfine scrubber (WS) outlet, and by collecting the ESP dust. Few data are available on these micropollutants produced in iron ore sintering plants, particularly from Italian plants. This study investigates the PAH emission profiles and the removal efficiency of ESPs and WS. PAHs were determined at the stack, ESP outlet flue gases, and in ESP dust to characterize the emission profiles and the performance of the ESP and the WS for reducing PAH emission. The 11 PAHs monitored are listed in the Italian legislative decree 152/2006. The mean total PAH sum concentration in the stack flue gases is 3.96 {mu}g/N m{sup 3}, in ESP outlet flue gases is 9.73 {mu}g/N m{sup 3}, and in ESP dust is 0.53 {mu}g/g. Regarding the emission profiles, the most abundant compound is benzo(b)fluoranthene, which has a relative low BaP toxic equivalency factors (TEF) value, followed by dibenzo(a,l)pyrene, which has a very high BaP(TEF) value. The emission profiles in ESP dust and in the flue gases after the ESP show some changes, whereas the fingerprint in ESP and stack flue gases is very similar. The removal efficiency of the ESP and of WS on the total PAH concentration is 5.2 and 59.5%, respectively. 2 figs., 5 tabs.

  19. The Navajo scrubber project -- Start up and performance testing of the largest FGD system in the USA

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Lusko, J.; Massion, R.; Sekhar, N.

    1998-07-01

    The Navajo Scrubber Project located in Page, Arizona is the largest Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) system in the USA. Limestone based FGD system producing disposable grade gypsum is being installed on Units 1,2 and 3 (3 x 750 MWe) at the Navajo Generating Station (NGS) to comply with an EPA ruling mandating SO{sub 2} emission reduction to improve visibility in the Grand Canyon National Park. Compliance will be phased-in by unit in 1997, 1998 and 1999. The NGS burns low-sulfur coal with a sulfur content of approximately 0.5%. The FGD system is designed to treat a total flue gas flow of 11.25 million acfm, at an SO{sub 2} removal efficiency of 92% for an emission of 0.1 lb. per million BTU. Unique features of the FGD system include, a totally closed loop water balance system, 775 ft. chimney with C-276 alloy clad designed to handle both wet and hot dry gas, solid C-276 alloy absorber vessels and the use of existing ID fans, with suitable modification, to overcome the additional pressure drop of the FGD system. The start-up sequence/operation and performance tests of Unit 3 of this unique FGD system is described in this paper. Performance tests include, removal efficiency determination at 0.6 and 0.8% sulfur coal at normal and 60,000 PPM chloride in the slurry, particulate carry over determination under normal as well as upset ESP conditions, and determination of mist eliminator carry-over using Video Droplet Analyzer.

  20. A 12-MW-scale pilot study of in-duct scrubbing (IDS) using a rotary atomizer

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Samuel, E.A.; Murphy, K.R.; Demian, A.

    1989-11-01

    A low-cost, moderate-removal efficiency, flue gas desulfurization (FGD) technology was selected by the US Department of Energy for pilot demonstration in its Acid Rain Precursor Control Technology Initiative. The process, identified as In-Duct Scrubbing (IDS), applies rotary atomizer techniques developed for lime-based spray dryer FGD while utilizing existing flue gas ductwork and particulate collectors. IDS technology is anticipated to result in a dry desulfurization process with a moderate removal efficiency (50% or greater) for high-sulfur coal-fired boilers. The critical elements for successful application are: (1) adequate mixing of sorbent droplets with flue gas for efficient reaction contact, (2) sufficient residence time to produce a non-wetting product, and (3) appropriate ductwork cross-sectional area to prevent deposition of wet reaction products before particle drying is comple. The ductwork in many older plants, previously modified to meet 1970 Clean Air Act requirements for particulate control, usually meet these criteria. A 12 MW-scale IDS pilot plant was constructed at the Muskingum River Plant of the American Electric Power System. The pilot plant, which operates from a slipstrem attached to the air-preheater outlet duct from the Unit 5 boiler at the Muskingum River Plant (which burns about 4% sulfur coal), is equipped with three atomizer stations to test the IDS concept in vertical and horizontal configurations. In addition, the pilot plant is equipped to test the effect of injecting IDS off- product upstream of the atomizer, on SO{sub 2}and NO{sub x} removals.

  1. SUBMERGED GRAVEL SCRUBBER DEMONSTRATION AS A PASSIVE AIR CLEANER FOR CONTAINMENT VENTING AND PURGING WITH SODIUM AEROSOLS -- CSTF TESTS AC7 - AC10

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    HILLIARD, R K.; MCCORMACK, J D.; POSTMA, A K.

    1981-11-01

    Four large-scale air cleaning tests (AC7 - AC10) were performed in the Containment Systems Test Facility (CS'lF) to demonstrate the performance of a Submerged Gravel Scrubber for cleaning the effluent gas from a vented and purged breeder reactor containment vessel. The test article, comprised of a Submerged Gravel Scrubber (SGS) followed by a high efficiency fiber demister, had a design gas flow rate of 0.47 m{sup 3}/s (1000 ft{sup 3}/min) at a pressure drop of 9.0 kPa (36 in. H{sub 2}O). The test aerosol was sodium oxide, sodium hydroxide, or sodium carbonate generated in the 850-m{sup 3} CSTF vessel by continuously spraying sodium into the air-filled vessel while adding steam or carbon dioxide. Approximately 4500 kg (10,000 lb) of sodium was sprayed over a total period of 100 h during the tests. The SGS/Demister system was shown to be highly efficient (removing ~99.98% of the entering sodium aerosol mass), had a high mass loading capacity, and operated in a passive manner, with no electrical requirement. Models for predicting aerosol capture, gas cooling, and pressure drop are developed and compared with experimental results.

  2. Compact air scrubber

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Bentley, Bill F.; Jett, James H.; Martin, John C.; Saunders, George C.

    1992-01-01

    Method and apparatus for removing material from a gas. A mist created by a piezoelectric ultrasonic transducer is contacted with the gas and both gas and mist are passed through baffled separators. Liquid effluent from the separators contains solid material removed from the gas and gaseous material which reacted with the liquid or was absorbed by the liquid. The invention is useful for collecting a sample of material in a gas, such as a vapor in the atmosphere, and in cleaning a gas. A relatively concentrated solution of a material present in a gas in a very small concentration can be obtained.

  3. Microsoft Word - PhycalAlgaePilotProject_NEPAFinalEA_October2011...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ... of dirt, when windy or dry conditions promote problematic fugitive dust emissions. ... refining plant flue gas using in-duct scrubber, then coupled with alkaline clay ...

  4. ch1_General_Info

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ... of dirt, when windy or dry conditions promote problematic fugitive dust emissions. ... refining plant flue gas using in-duct scrubber, then coupled with alkaline clay ...

  5. Design/installation and structural integrity assessment of Bethel Valley low-level waste collection and transfer system upgrade for Building 3092 (Central Off-Gas Scrubber Facility) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-01-01

    This document describes and assesses planned modifications to be made to the Building 3092 Central Off-Gas Scrubber Facility of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The modifications are made in responsible to the requirements of 40CFR264 Subpart J, relating to environmental protection requirements for buried tank systems. The modifications include the provision of a new scrubber recirculation tank in a new, below ground, lines concrete vault, replacing and existing recirculation sump that does not provide double containment. A new buried, double contained pipeline is provided to permit discharge of spent scrubber recirculation fluid to the Central Waste Collection Header. The new vault, tank, and discharge line are provided with leak detection and provisions to remove accumulated liquid. New scrubber recirculation pumps, piping, and accessories are also provided. This assessment concludes that the planned modifications comply with applicable requirements of 40CFR264 Subpart J, as set forth in Appendix F to the Federal Facility Agreement, Docket No. 89-04-FF, covering the Oak Ridge Reservation.

  6. Waste Treatment And Immobilization Plant U. S. Department Of Energy Office Of River Protection Submerged Bed Scrubber Condensate Disposition Project - Abstract # 13460

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Yanochko, Ronald M; Corcoran, Connie

    2012-11-15

    The Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) will generate an off-gas treatment system secondary liquid waste stream [submerged bed scrubber (SBS) condensate], which is currently planned for recycle back to the WTP Low Activity Waste (LAW) melter. This SBS condensate waste stream is high in Tc-99, which is not efficiently captured in the vitrified glass matrix. A pre-conceptual engineering study was prepared in fiscal year 2012 to evaluate alternate flow paths for melter off-gas secondary liquid waste generated by the WTP LAW facility. This study evaluated alternatives for direct off-site disposal of this SBS without pre-treatment, which mitigates potential issues associated with recycling.

  7. Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant U. S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection Submerged Bed Scrubber Condensate Disposition Project - 13460

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Yanochko, Ronald M. [Washington River Protection Solutions, P.O. Box 850, Richland, Washington 99352 (United States)] [Washington River Protection Solutions, P.O. Box 850, Richland, Washington 99352 (United States); Corcoran, Connie [AEM Consulting, LLC, 1201 Jadwin Avenue, Richland, Washington 99352 (United States)] [AEM Consulting, LLC, 1201 Jadwin Avenue, Richland, Washington 99352 (United States)

    2013-07-01

    The Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) will generate an off-gas treatment system secondary liquid waste stream [submerged bed scrubber (SBS) condensate], which is currently planned for recycle back to the WTP Low Activity Waste (LAW) melter. This SBS condensate waste stream is high in Tc-99, which is not efficiently captured in the vitrified glass matrix [1]. A pre-conceptual engineering study was prepared in fiscal year 2012 to evaluate alternate flow paths for melter off-gas secondary liquid waste generated by the WTP LAW facility [2]. This study evaluated alternatives for direct off-site disposal of this SBS without pre-treatment, which mitigates potential issues associated with recycling. This study [2] concluded that SBS direct disposal is a viable option to the WTP baseline. The results show: - Off-site transportation and disposal of the SBS condensate is achievable and cost effective. - Reduction of approximately 4,325 vitrified WTP Low Activity Waste canisters could be realized. - Positive WTP operational impacts; minimal WTP construction impacts are realized. - Reduction of mass flow from the LAW Facility to the Pretreatment Facility by 66%. - Improved Double Shell Tank (DST) space management is a benefit. (authors)

  8. Fluid placement of fixated scrubber sludge to reduce surface subsidence and to abate acid mine drainage in abandoned underground coal mines

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Meiers, R.J.; Golden, D.; Gray, R.; Yu, W.C.

    1995-12-31

    Indianapolis Power and Light Company (IPL) began researching the use of fluid placement techniques of the fixated scrubber sludge (FSS) to reduce surface subsidence from underground coal mines to develop an economic alternative to low strength concrete grout. Abandoned underground coal mines surround property adjacent to IPL`s coal combustion by-product (CCBP) landfill at the Petersburg Generating Station. Landfill expansion into these areas is in question because of the high potential for sinkhole subsidence to develop. Sinkholes manifesting at the surface would put the integrity of a liner or runoff pond containment structure for a CCBP disposal facility at risk. The fluid placement techniques of the FSS as a subsidence abatement technology was demonstrated during an eight week period in September, October, and November 1994 at the Petersburg Generating Station. The success of this technology will be determined by the percentage of the mine void filled, strength of the FSS placed, and the overall effects on the hydrogeologic environment. The complete report for this project will be finalized in early 1996.

  9. Characterizing toxic emissions from a coal-fired power plant demonstrating the AFGD ICCT Project and a plant utilizing a dry scrubber/baghouse system: Bailly Station Units 7 and 8 and AFGD ICCT Project. Final report. Final report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Dismukes, E.B.

    1994-10-20

    This report describes results of assessment of the risk of emissions of hazardous air pollutants at one of the electric power stations, Bailly Station, which is also the site of a Clean Coal Technology project demonstrating the Pure Air Advanced Flue Gas Desulfurization process (wet limestone). This station represents the configuration of no NO{sub x} reduction, particulate control with electrostatic precipitators, and SO{sub 2} control with a wet scrubber. The test was conducted September 3--6, 1993. Sixteen trace metals were determined along with 5 major metals. Other inorganic substances and organic compounds were also determined.

  10. Minimizing Energy Losses in Ducts

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Insulating, air sealing, and placing ducts within the conditioned space of your home will reduce energy losses.

  11. CX-009842: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Demonstration of Multipollutant Reduction using a Lextran 3-in-1 Wet Scrubber CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 01/30/2013 Location(s): North Dakota Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  12. CX-004778: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Recovery Act: Innovative Carbon Dioxide Sequestration from Flue Gas using an In-Duct ScrubberCX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6Date: 12/27/2010Location(s): Point Comfort, TexasOffice(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  13. CX-004776: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Recovery Act: Innovative Carbon Dioxide Sequestration from Flue Gas using an In-Duct ScrubberCX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6Date: 12/27/2010Location(s): Grand Forks, North DakotaOffice(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  14. CX-004777: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Recovery Act: Innovative Carbon Dioxide Sequestration from Flue Gas using an In-Duct ScrubberCX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6Date: 12/27/2010Location(s): Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaOffice(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  15. Minimizing Energy Losses in Ducts | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Efficient and well-designed duct systems distribute air properly throughout your home ... extending in opposite directions from the air source, with many smaller ducts attached at ...

  16. Evaporation of iodine-containing off-gas scrubber solution

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Partridge, J.A.; Bosuego, G.P.

    1980-07-14

    Mercuric nitrate-nitric acid scrub solutions containing radioiodine may be reduced in volume without excessive loss of volatile iodine. The use of concentrated nitric acid during an evaporation process oxidizes the mercury-iodide complex to a less volatile mercuric iodate precipitate.

  17. Design and operating experience of the Holcomb Station dry scrubber

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Emerson, R.D.

    1985-01-01

    The Holcomb Station dry flue gas desulfurization system has been operational since May, 1983. The lime based system, consisting of three spray drying absorbers and two baghouses, has met all regulatory compliance requirements and contractual guarantee values. Some serious operational problems were encountered during the startup of this system. This paper discusses these problems and subsequent solutions along with testing experience to-date. The availability of this system for the first quarter of 1985 was 99.51 percent.

  18. Guarantee Testing Results from the Greenidge Mult-Pollutant Control Project

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Connell, Daniel P; Locke, James E

    2008-02-01

    CONSOL Energy Inc. Research & Development (CONSOL R&D) performed flue gas sampling at AES Greenidge to verify the performance of the multi-pollutant control system recently installed by Babcock Power Environmental Inc. (BPEI) on the 107-megawatt (MW) Unit 4 (Boiler 6). The multi-pollutant control system includes combustion modifications and a hybrid selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR)/induct selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system to reduce NO{sub x} emissions, followed by a Turbosorp{reg_sign} circulating fluidized bed dry scrubber system and baghouse to reduce emissions of SO{sub 2}, SO{sub 3}, HCl, HF, and particulate matter. Mercury removal is provided via the co-benefits afforded by the in-duct SCR, dry scrubber, and baghouse and by injection of activated carbon upstream of the scrubber, as required. Testing was conducted through ports located at the inlet and outlet of the SCR reactor to evaluate the performance of the hybrid NO{sub x} control system, as well as through ports located at the air heater outlet and baghouse outlet or stack to determine pollutant removal efficiencies across the Turbosorp{reg_sign} scrubber and baghouse. Data from the unit's stack continuous emission monitor (CEM) were also used for determining attainment of the performance targets for NO{sub x} emissions and SO{sub 2} removal efficiency.

  19. Theoretical approach for enhanced mass transfer effects in-duct flue gas desulfurization processes

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Jozewicz, W. . Environmental Systems Div.); Rochelle, G.T. . Dept. of Chemical Engineering)

    1992-01-29

    Removal of sulfur dioxide (SO{sub 2}) from the flue gas of coal- burning power plants can be achieved by duct spray drying using calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH){sub 2}) slurries. A primary objective of this research was to discover the aspects of mass transfer into Ca(OH){sub 2} slurries which limit SO{sub 2} absorption. A bench- scale stirred tank reactor with a flat gas/liquid interface was used to simulate SO{sub 2} absorption in a slurry droplet. The absorption rate of SO{sub 2} from gas concentrations of 500 to 5000 ppm was measured at 55{degrees}C in clear solutions and slurries of Ca(OH){sub 2} up to 1.0 M (7 wt percent). Results are reported in terms of the enhancement factor, {O}. This research will allow prediction of conditions where the absorption of SO{sub 2} in Ca(OH){sub 2} slurries can be enhanced by changes to liquid phase constituents (under which SO{sub 2} absorption is controlled by liquid film mass transfer). Experiments in the stirred tank have shown that SO{sub 2} absorption in a 1.0 M Ca(OH){sub 2} slurry was completely dominated by gas film mass transfer with a large excess of Ca(OH){sub 2} but becomes controlled by liquid film resistance at greater than 50 percent Ca(OH){sub 2} utilization. (VC)

  20. In-duct humidification system development for the LIMB demonstration project

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Amrhein, G.T.; Smith, P.V. )

    1988-01-01

    Two keys to an operable humidification system are the atomizer design and the atomizer arrangement within the duct. The atomizer must produce a spray of extremely small droplets in order to achieve complete evaporation in the short residence times available in most ducts. The atomizers must also be installed in such a way as to prevent droplet impingement on the duct walls, minimize the ash deposition on the atomizer tip, and maximize the mixing between the spray and flue gas. Good mixing is essential to maximize SO{sub 2} removal and to ensure complete evaporation. A full-scale demonstration of LIMB technology will be conducted on the 105 MW, Unit 4 Boiler at Ohio Edison's Edgewater Station in Lorain, Ohio. This paper presents the results of a project to develop a humidification system for the full-scale demonstration.

  1. Recovery Act: Innovative CO2 Sequestration from Flue Gas Using Industrial Sources and Innovative Concept for Beneficial CO2 Use

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Dando, Neal; Gershenzon, Mike; Ghosh, Rajat

    2012-07-31

    field testing of a biomimetic in-duct scrubbing system for the capture of gaseous CO2 coupled with sequestration of captured carbon by carbonation of alkaline industrial wastes. The Phase 2 project, reported on here, combined efforts in enzyme development, scrubber optimization, and sequestrant evaluations to perform an economic feasibility study of technology deployment. The optimization of carbonic anhydrase (CA) enzyme reactivity and stability are critical steps in deployment of this technology. A variety of CA enzyme variants were evaluated for reactivity and stability in both bench scale and in laboratory pilot scale testing to determine current limits in enzyme performance. Optimization of scrubber design allowed for improved process economics while maintaining desired capture efficiencies. A range of configurations, materials, and operating conditions were examined at the Alcoa Technical Center on a pilot scale scrubber. This work indicated that a cross current flow utilizing a specialized gas-liquid contactor offered the lowest system operating energy. Various industrial waste materials were evaluated as sources of alkalinity for the scrubber feed solution and as sources of calcium for precipitation of carbonate. Solids were mixed with a simulated sodium bicarbonate scrubber blowdown to comparatively examine reactivity. Supernatant solutions and post-test solids were analyzed to quantify and model the sequestration reactions. The best performing solids were found to sequester between 2.3 and 2.9 moles of CO2 per kg of dry solid in 1-4 hours of reaction time. These best performing solids were cement kiln dust, circulating dry scrubber ash, and spray dryer absorber ash. A techno-economic analysis was performed to evaluate the commercial viability of the proposed carbon capture and sequestration process in full-scale at an aluminum smelter and a refinery location. For both cases the in-duct scrubber technology was compared to traditional amine- based capture

  2. Double-Win "Algal Turf Scrubbers" Help to Clean Up Baltimore...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    The Sandia team is working to maximize biomass fuel yield, while improving the logistics and economics of scaling the system to commercial production. Current challenges being ...

  3. Pure Air`s Bailly scrubber: A four-year retrospective

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Manavi, G.B.; Vymazal, D.C.; Sarkus, T.A.

    1997-12-31

    Pure Air`s Advanced Flue Gas Desulfurization (AFGD) Clean Coal Project has completed four highly successful years of operation at NIPSCO`s Bailly Station. As part of their program, Pure Air has concluded a six-part study of system performance. This paper summarizes the results of the demonstration program, including AFGD performance on coals ranging from 2.0--2.4% sulfur. The paper highlights novel aspects of the Bailly facility, including pulverized limestone injection, air rotary sparger for oxidation, wastewater evaporation system and the production of PowerChip{reg_sign} gypsum. Operations and maintenance which have led to the facility`s notable 99.47% availability record are also discussed. A project company, Pure Air on the Lake Limited Partnership, owns the AFGD facility. Pure Air was the turn key contractor and Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. is the operator of the AFGD system.

  4. Enhanced NO{sub x} removal in wet scrubbers using metal chelates. Final report, Volume 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Smith, K.; Lani, B.; Berisko, D.; Schultz, C.; Carlson, W.; Benson, L.B.

    1992-12-01

    Successful pilot plant tests of simultaneous removal of S0{sub 2} and NO{sub x} in a wet lime flue gas desulfurization system were concluded in December. The tests, at up to 1.5 MW(e) capacity, were conducted by the Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company and Dravo Lime Company for the US Department of Energy at a pilot facility at the Miami Fort station of CG&E near Cincinnati, Ohio. The pilot plant scrubbed a slipstream of flue gas from Unit 7, a 530 MW coal-fired electric generating unit. Tests were conducted in three phases between April and December. The technology tested was wet scrubbing with Thiosorbic{reg_sign} magnesium-enhanced lime for S0{sub 2} removal and simultaneous NO scrubbing with ferrous EDTA, a metal chelate. Magnesium-enhanced lime-based wet scrubbing is used at 20 full-scale high-sulfur coal-fired electric generating units with a combined capacity of 8500 NW. Ferrous EDTA reacts with nitric oxide, NO, which comprises about 95% of NO{sub x} from coal-fired boilers. In this report, although not precise, NO and NO{sub x} are used interchangably. A major objective of the tests was to combine NO{sub x} removal using ferrous EDTA, a developing technology, with SO{sub 2} removal using wet lime FGD, already in wide commercial use. If successful, this could allow wide application of this NO{sub x} removal technology.

  5. A minimum-cost SO{sub 2} scrubber case study

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kasparu, J.

    1995-12-01

    The role of Czech Power Company in the environment improvement process and its program to meet new legislation environment requirements.

  6. Removal of hydrogen sulfide from waste treatment plant biogas using the apollo scrubber

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Smith, J.W.; Burrowes, P.A.; Gupta, A.; Walton, P.S.; Meffe, S.

    1996-12-31

    The removal of hydrogen sulfide and other sulphur compounds from anaerobic digester gas streams prior to their use as fuel for boilers, stationary engines, and cogeneration units minimizes corrosion problems and reduces sulfur emission loadings. A research program at the Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto in the 1980`s demonstrated the use of a modified flotation cell for the absorption of hydrogen sulfide from a gas stream and its catalytic oxidation to sulfur. The essence of the technology was a proprietary gas liquid contactor which provided very high mass transfer rates at the interface. A bench scale contactor developed at the university achieved hydrogen sulfide removal efficiencies of over 99.9% at atmospheric pressure. A demonstration unit for digester gas scrubbing applications was designed, fabricated, and then installed and evaluated at the Metropolitan Toronto Works Department - Main Treatment Plant (MTP).

  7. Mercuric iodate precipitation from radioiodine-containing off-gas scrubber solution

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Partridge, Jerry A.; Bosuego, Gail P.

    1982-01-01

    Mercuric nitrate-nitric acid scrub solutions containing radioiodine may be reduced in volume without excessive loss of volatile iodine. The use of concentrated nitric acid during an evaporation process oxidizes the mercury-iodide complex to a less volatile mercuric iodate precipitate.

  8. Specifically Designed Constructed Wetlands: A Novel Treatment Approach for Scrubber Wastewater

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    John H. Rodgers Jr; James W. Castle; Chris Arrington: Derek Eggert; Meg Iannacone

    2005-09-01

    A pilot-scale wetland treatment system was specifically designed and constructed at Clemson University to evaluate removal of mercury, selenium, and other constituents from flue gas desulfurization (FGD) wastewater. Specific objectives of this research were: (1) to measure performance of a pilot-scale constructed wetland treatment system in terms of decreases in targeted constituents (Hg, Se and As) in the FGD wastewater from inflow to outflow; (2) to determine how the observed performance is achieved (both reactions and rates); and (3) to measure performance in terms of decreased bioavailability of these elements (i.e. toxicity of sediments in constructed wetlands and toxicity of outflow waters from the treatment system). Performance of the pilot-scale constructed wetland treatment systems was assessed using two criteria: anticipated NPDES permit levels and toxicity evaluations using two sentinel toxicity-testing organisms (Ceriodaphnia dubia and Pimephales promelas). These systems performed efficiently with varied inflow simulations of FGD wastewaters removing As, Hg, and Se concentrations below NPDES permit levels and reducing the toxicity of simulated FGD wastewater after treatment with the constructed wetland treatment systems. Sequential extraction procedures indicated that these elements (As, Hg, and Se) were bound to residual phases within sediments of these systems, which should limit their bioavailability to aquatic biota. Sediments collected from constructed wetland treatment systems were tested to observe toxicity to Hyalella azteca or Chironomus tetans. Complete survival (100%) was observed for H. azteca in all cells of the constructed wetland treatment system and C. tentans had an average of 91% survival over the three treatment cells containing sediments. Survival and growth of H. azteca and C. tentans did not differ significantly between sediments from the constructed wetland treatment system and controls. Since the sediments of the constructed wetland treatment system are repositories for As, Hg, and Se and the bioavailability of these elements decreased after deposition, the pilot-scale constructed wetland treatment system contributed significantly to mitigation of risks to aquatic life from these elements.

  9. Model for flue-gas desulfurization in a circulating dry scrubber

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Neathery, J.K.

    1996-01-01

    A simple model was developed to describe the absorption of SO{sub 2} in a circulating dry scrubbing (CDS) process, which is a semi dry, lime-based, flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) process that utilizes a circulating fluidized bed arrangement for contacting a sorbent with SO{sub 2}-laden flue gas under coolside conditions. The reaction chemistry is thought to be similar to that of spray-drying absorption. The liquid-phase mass-transfer coefficient was successfully modeled as a function of the sorbent particle spacing on the wetted surfaces. Gas-phase mass-transfer resistances were assumed to be insignificant. Due to the high surface area available in a CDS reactor, the evaporation rate of water from the slurry was modeled as constant-rate drying according to classic spray-dryer theory. However, the falling-rate and diffusion evaporation stages were negligible in CDS since sorbent particle bunching at the surface of the slurry is nonexistent.

  10. The Discrete Equation Method (DEM) for Fully Compressible, Two-Phase Flows in Ducts of Spatially Varying Cross-Section

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    R. A. Berry; R. Saurel; O. LeMetayer

    2010-11-01

    For the simulation of light water nuclear reactor coolant flows, general two-phase models (valid for all volume fractions) have been generally used which, while allowing for velocity disequilibrium, normally force pressure equilibrium between the phases (see, for example, the numerous models of this type described in H. Städtke, Gasdynamic Aspects of Two-Phase Flow, Wiley-VCH, 2006). These equations are not hyperbolic, their physical wave dynamics are incorrect, and their solution algorithms rely on dubious truncation error induced artificial viscosity to render them numerically well posed over a portion of the computational spectrum. The inherent problems of the traditional approach to multiphase modeling, which begins with an averaged system of (ill-posed) partial differential equations (PDEs) which are then discretized to form a numerical scheme, are avoided by employing a new homogenization method known as the Discrete Equation Method (DEM) (R. Abgrall and R. Saurel, Discrete Equations for Physical and Numerical Compressible Multiphase Mixtures, J. Comp. Phys. 186, 361-396, 2003). This method results in well-posed hyperbolic systems, this property being important for transient flows. This also allows a clear treatment of non-conservative terms (terms involving interfacial variables and volume fraction gradients) permitting the solution of interface problems without conservation errors, this feature being important for the direct numerical simulation of two-phase flows. Unlike conventional methods, the averaged system of PDEs for the mixture are not used, and the DEM method directly obtains a well-posed discrete equation system from the single-phase conservation laws, producing a numerical scheme which accurately computes fluxes for arbitrary number of phases and solves non-conservative products. The method effectively uses a sequence of single phase Riemann problem solutions. Phase interactions are accounted for by Riemann solvers at each interface. Non-conservative terms are correctly approximated. Some of the closure relations missing from the traditional approach are automatically obtained. Lastly, the continuous equation system resulting from the discrete equations can be identified by taking the continuous limit with weak-wave assumptions. In this work, this approach is tested by constructing a DEM model for the flow of two compressible phases in 1-D ducts of spatially varying cross-section with explicit time integration. An analytical equation of state is included for both water vapor and liquid phases, and a realistic interphase mass transfer model is developed based on interphase heat transfer. A robust compliment of boundary conditions are developed and discussed. Though originally conceived as a first step toward implict time integration of the DEM method (to relieve time step size restrictions due to stiffness and to achieve tighter coupling of equations) in multidimensions, this model offers some unique capabilities for incorporation into next generation light water reactor safety analysis codes. We demonstrate, on a converging-diverging two-phase nozzle, that this well-posed, 2-pressure, 2-velocity DEM model can be integrated to a realistic and meaningful steady-state with both phases treated as compressible.

  11. Theoretical approach for enhanced mass transfer effects in-duct flue gas desulfurization processes. Volume 2, Duct spray drying: Final report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Jozewicz, W.; Rochelle, G.T.

    1992-01-29

    Removal of sulfur dioxide (SO{sub 2}) from the flue gas of coal- burning power plants can be achieved by duct spray drying using calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH){sub 2}] slurries. A primary objective of this research was to discover the aspects of mass transfer into Ca(OH){sub 2} slurries which limit SO{sub 2} absorption. A bench- scale stirred tank reactor with a flat gas/liquid interface was used to simulate SO{sub 2} absorption in a slurry droplet. The absorption rate of SO{sub 2} from gas concentrations of 500 to 5000 ppm was measured at 55{degrees}C in clear solutions and slurries of Ca(OH){sub 2} up to 1.0 M (7 wt percent). Results are reported in terms of the enhancement factor, {O}. This research will allow prediction of conditions where the absorption of SO{sub 2} in Ca(OH){sub 2} slurries can be enhanced by changes to liquid phase constituents (under which SO{sub 2} absorption is controlled by liquid film mass transfer). Experiments in the stirred tank have shown that SO{sub 2} absorption in a 1.0 M Ca(OH){sub 2} slurry was completely dominated by gas film mass transfer with a large excess of Ca(OH){sub 2} but becomes controlled by liquid film resistance at greater than 50 percent Ca(OH){sub 2} utilization. (VC)

  12. Definitions - D

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    generation, flood control, irrigation, or other use. Also refers to the act of lowering reservoir levels. dry scrubber See scrubber. DSI Direct-service industry. See...

  13. CHEM.PLANT.ADMIN.REC.302.1.08.T.PDF

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ... quench scrubber, a submicron aerosol scrubber, a nitrogen oxide gas removal system, ... Particulate emissions must not exceed 180 mgdscm (dry standard cubic meter) or 0.008 gr...

  14. Detection and treatment of chemical weapons and/or biological...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    pathogens uses a detector system, an electrostatic precipitator or scrubber, a circulation system, and a control. The precipitator or scrubber is activated in response to a...

  15. Recent advances in use of magnesium-enhanced FGD processes include a natural oxidation limestone scrubber conversion and the first commercial ThioClear{reg{underscore}sign} application

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Smith, K.; Babu, M; Inkenhaus, W.

    1998-07-01

    The magnesium-enhanced Thiosorbic FGD process, originally developed by the Dravo Lime Company (DLC) in the early 1970's, is used by over 1,400 MW of power generation in the US primarily by high sulfur coal burning utilities. The excellent SO{sub 2} removal efficiencies, high reliability, and cost effectiveness are the hallmarks of this process. DLC personnel working with Alabama Electric Cooperative's (AEC) personnel converted AEC's Units 2 and 3 at the Lowman Station in Alabama from limestone scrubbing to magnesium-enhanced lime scrubbing process in early 1996. These units totaling 516 MW have been in continuous operation, enabling AEC to save on fuel costs by switching to a lower cost, higher sulfur containing coal, made possible by the higher removal efficiency Thiosorbic process modification. The first part of this paper details the modification that were made and compares the performance differences between the limestone and Thiosorbic FGD processes. ThioClear{reg{underscore}sign} FGD is a forced oxidized magnesium-enhanced lime scrubbing process that produces high quality gypsum and magnesium hydroxide as by-products. The recycle liquor in this process is nearly clear and the capability for SO{sub 2} removal is as high as the Thiosorbic process. DLC working with Applied Energy Systems (AES) of Monaca, Pennsylvania, is currently constructing a 130 Mwe station modification to convert from the natural oxidation Thiosorbic process to the forced oxidation ThioClear{reg{underscore}sign} process. The plant is scheduled to start up by the end of the third quarter of this year. The second part oft his paper details the ThioClear process modifications at AES and describes the by-products and their potential uses.

  16. Recent advances in use of magnesium-enhanced FGD processes include a natural oxidation limestone scrubber conversion and the first commercial ThioClear{reg_sign} application

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Smith, K.; Babu, M.; Inkenhaus, W.

    1998-04-01

    The magnesium-enhanced Thiosorbic FGD process, originally developed by the Dravo Lime Company (DLC) in the early 1970`s, is used by over 1400 MW of power generation in the US primarily by high sulfur coal burning utilities. The excellent SO{sub 2} removal efficiencies, high reliability, and cost effectiveness are the hallmarks of this process. DLC personnel working with Alabama Electric Cooperative`s (AEC) personnel converted AEC`s Units 2 and 3 at the Lowman Station in Alabama from limestone scrubbing to magnesium-enhanced lime scrubbing process in early 1996. These units totaling 516 MW have been in continuous operation, enabling AEC to save on fuel costs by switching to a lower cost, higher sulfur containing coal, made possible by the higher removal efficiency Thiosorbic process modification. The first part of this paper details the modifications that were made and compares the performance differences between the limestone and Thiosorbic FGD processes. ThioClear{reg_sign} FGD is a forced oxidized magnesium-enhanced lime scrubbing process that produces high quality gypsum and magnesium hydroxide as by-products. The recycle liquor in this process is nearly clear and the capability for SO{sub 2} removal is as high as the Thiosorbic process. DLC working with Applied Energy Systems (AES) of Monaca, Pennsylvania, is currently constructing a 130 Mwe station modification to convert from the natural oxidation Thiosorbic process to the forced oxidation ThioClear{reg_sign} process. The plant is scheduled to start up by the end of the third quarter of this year. The second part of this paper details the ThioClear process modifications at AES and describes the by-ducts and their potential uses.

  17. Addendum to Guarantee Testing Results from the Greenidge Multi-Pollutant Control Project: Additiona NH3, NOx, and CO Testing Results

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Connell, Daniel P; Locke, James E

    2008-03-01

    On March 28-30 and May 1-4, 2007, CONSOL Energy Inc. Research & Development (CONSOL R&D) performed flue gas sampling at AES Greenidge to verify the performance of the multi-pollutant control system recently installed by Babcock Power Environmental Inc. (BPEI) on the 107-MW Unit 4 (Boiler 6). The multi-pollutant control system includes combustion modifications and a hybrid selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR)/in-duct selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system to reduce NO{sub x} emissions, followed by a Turbosorp{reg_sign} circulating fluidized bed dry scrubber system and baghouse to reduce emissions of SO{sub 2}, SO{sub 3}, HCl, HF, and particulate matter. Mercury removal is provided via the co-benefits afforded by the in-duct SCR, dry scrubber, and baghouse and by injection of activated carbon upstream of the scrubber, as required. The testing in March and May demonstrated that the multi-pollutant control system attained its performance targets for NO{sub x} emissions, SO{sub 2} removal efficiency, acid gas (SO{sub 3}, HCl, and HF) removal efficiency, and mercury removal efficiency. However, the ammonia slip measured between the SCR outlet and air heater inlet was consistently greater than the guarantee of 2 ppmvd {at} 3% O{sub 2}. As a result, additional testing was performed on May 30-June 1 and on June 20-21, 2007, in conjunction with tuning of the hybrid NO{sub x} control system by BPEI, in an effort to achieve the performance target for ammonia slip. This additional testing occurred after the installation of a large particle ash (LPA) screen and removal system just above the SCR reactor and a fresh SCR catalyst layer in mid-May. This report describes the results of the additional tests. During the May 30-June 1 sampling period, CONSOL R&D and Clean Air Engineering (CAE) each measured flue gas ammonia concentrations at the air heater inlet, downstream of the in-duct SCR reactor. In addition, CONSOL R&D measured flue gas ammonia concentrations at the

  18. Commercial-scale dry scrubbing holds promise for SO2 control

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1980-07-01

    Dry-scrubber systems coupled with fabric filters offer viable alternatives to high cost wet scrubbers and electrostatic precipitators. The dry scrubber design requires less energy and capital investment and is relatively simple. The only drawback to dry scrubbers is the high cost of alkali absorbent. Savings in capital and maintenance costs would offset the high cost of alkali absorbent in the long run. Operation of commercial dry scrubbers is expected to begin in 1981. (1 diagram, 2 photos, 1 table)

  19. Greenridge Multi-Pollutant Control Project Preliminary Public Design Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Connell, Daniel P

    2009-01-12

    The Greenidge Multi-Pollutant Control Project is being conducted as part of the U.S. Department of Energy's Power Plant Improvement Initiative to demonstrate an innovative combination of air pollution control technologies that can cost-effectively reduce emissions of SO{sub 2}, NO{sub x}, Hg, acid gases (SO{sub 3}, HCl, and HF), and particulate matter from smaller coal-fired electrical generating units (EGUs). The multi-pollutant control system includes a hybrid selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR)/in-duct selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system to reduce NOx emissions by {ge}60%, followed by a Turbosorp{reg_sign} circulating fluidized bed dry scrubber system to reduce emissions of SO{sub 2}, SO{sub 3}, HCl, and HF by {ge}95%. Mercury removal of {ge}90% is also targeted via the co-benefits afforded by the in-duct SCR, dry scrubber, and baghouse and by injection of activated carbon upstream of the scrubber, as required. The technology is particularly well suited, because of its relatively low capital and maintenance costs and small space requirements, to meet the needs of coal-fired units with capacities of 50-300 MWe. There are about 440 such units in the United States that currently are not equipped with SCR, flue gas desulfurization (FGD), or mercury control systems. These smaller units are a valuable part of the nation's energy infrastructure, constituting about 60 GW of installed capacity. However, with the onset of the Clean Air Interstate Rule, Clean Air Mercury Rule, and various state environmental actions requiring deep reductions in emissions of SO{sub 2}, NO{sub x}, and mercury, the continued operation of these units increasingly depends upon the ability to identify viable air pollution control retrofit options for them. The large capital costs and sizable space requirements associated with conventional technologies such as SCR and wet FGD make these technologies unattractive for many smaller units. The Greenidge Project aims to confirm the

  20. Presentation title: This can be up to 2 lines

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    represented by requiring scrubbers or dry sorbent injection and fabric filter - CO2: ... ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE 15 Cumulative SO2 scrubber retrofits, 2012-2040 gigawatts 0 5 10 15 ...

  1. Presentation title: This can be up to 2 lines

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    ... U.S. dry natural gas trillion cubic feet per year Source: EIA, Annual Energy Outlook 2011 ... Source: EIA, Annual Energy Outlook 2011 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 2009 Scrubber GHG Scrubber GHG ...

  2. Flue gas desulfurization method and apparatus

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Madden, Deborah A.; Farthing, George A.

    1998-08-18

    A combined furnace limestone injection and dry scrubber flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system collects solids from the flue gas stream in first particulate collection device located downstream of an outlet of a convection pass of the furnace and upstream of the dry scrubber. The collected solids are diverted to the dry scrubber feed slurry preparation system to increase sulfur oxide species removal efficiency and sorbent utilization. The level of lime in the feed slurry provided to the dry scrubber is thus increased, which enhances removal of sulfur oxide species in the dry scrubber. The decreased particulate loading to the dry scrubber helps maintain a desired degree of free moisture in the flue gas stream entering the dry scrubber, which enhances sulfur oxide species removal both in the dry scrubber and downstream particulate collector, normally a baghouse.

  3. 20% Wind Energy by 2030: Increasing Wind Energy's Contribution...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ... its source, but at a higher temperature. z Dry cooling: Air cools steam, using far less ... Coal Steam Plant (No SO 2 Scrubber) No-Scrubbers may be added to meet SO 2 constraints. ...

  4. Advanced emissions control development project. Phase I final report appendices, November 1, 1993--February 29, 1996

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Farthing, G.A.

    1996-06-01

    Appendices are presented on the Advanced Emissions Control Development Project on the following: wet scrubber sampling and analysis; DBA/lime chemical analysis; limestone forced oxidation chemical analysis; benchmarking on baghouse conditions, electrostatic precipitators, and wet scrubber conditions.

  5. Flue gas desulfurization method and apparatus

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Madden, Deborah A.; Farthing, George A.

    1998-09-29

    A combined furnace limestone injection and dry scrubber flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system collects solids from the flue gas stream in first particulate collection device located downstream of an outlet of a convection pass of the furnace and upstream of the dry scrubber. The collected solids are diverted to the dry scrubber feed slurry preparation system to increase sulfur oxide species removal efficiency and sorbent utilization. The level of lime in the feed slurry provided to the dry scrubber is thus increased, which enhances removal of sulfur oxide species in the dry scrubber. The decreased particulate loading to the dry scrubber helps maintain a desired degree of free moisture in the flue gas stream entering the dry scrubber, which enhances sulfur oxide species removal both in the dry scrubber and downstream particulate collector, normally a baghouse.

  6. Flue gas desulfurization method and apparatus

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Madden, D.A.; Farthing, G.A.

    1998-09-29

    A combined furnace limestone injection and dry scrubber flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system collects solids from the flue gas stream in first particulate collection device located downstream of an outlet of a convection pass of the furnace and upstream of the dry scrubber. The collected solids are diverted to the dry scrubber feed slurry preparation system to increase sulfur oxide species removal efficiency and sorbent utilization. The level of lime in the feed slurry provided to the dry scrubber is thus increased, which enhances removal of sulfur oxide species in the dry scrubber. The decreased particulate loading to the dry scrubber helps maintain a desired degree of free moisture in the flue gas stream entering the dry scrubber, which enhances sulfur oxide species removal both in the dry scrubber and downstream particulate collector, normally a baghouse. 5 figs.

  7. Flue gas desulfurization method and apparatus

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Madden, D.A.; Farthing, G.A.

    1998-08-18

    A combined furnace limestone injection and dry scrubber flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system collects solids from the flue gas stream in first particulate collection device located downstream of an outlet of a convection pass of the furnace and upstream of the dry scrubber. The collected solids are diverted to the dry scrubber feed slurry preparation system to increase sulfur oxide species removal efficiency and sorbent utilization. The level of lime in the feed slurry provided to the dry scrubber is thus increased, which enhances removal of sulfur oxide species in the dry scrubber. The decreased particulate loading to the dry scrubber helps maintain a desired degree of free moisture in the flue gas stream entering the dry scrubber, which enhances sulfur oxide species removal both in the dry scrubber and downstream particulate collector, normally a baghouse. 5 figs.

  8. INEOS New Planet BioEnergy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    * Percent complete: 100% * Barriers addressed - HCN, installed scrubber system - Power outages - Regulatory Timeline Budget Barriers * INEOS Bio * Technology license * Overall ...

  9. Thermochemical Conversion Pilot Plant (Fact Sheet), NREL (National...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    pyrolysis products using a dodecane scrubber; includes integrated downstream ... corn stover, corn fiber, distillers dry grains, agricultural waste, and other ...

  10. DOE-STD-1156-2002; Environmental Compliance Function Area Qualificatio...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    ... Describe the role of lapse rate in determining dispersion coefficients. * Dry adiabatic ... precipitator * Thermal oxidizer * Scrubber * Adsorption 23. Environmental ...

  11. DOE-STD-1157-2002; Environmental Restoration Functional Area...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    ... Describe the role of lapse rate in determining dispersion coefficients. * Dry adiabatic ... precipitator * Thermal oxidizer * Scrubber * Adsorption 32. Environmental ...

  12. bia-cemkiln | netl.doe.gov

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2 Cement Kiln Flue Gas Recovery Scrubber - Project Brief [PDF-247KB] Passamaquoddy Technology Limited Partnership, Thomaston, ME Program Publications Final Reports Passamaquoddy Technology Recovery Scrubber(tm) Final Report, Volume 1 [PDF-5.4MB] (Feb 1994) Final Report, Volume 2 and Appendices A - M [PDF-10.4MB] (Feb 1994) CCT Reports: Project Performance Summaries, Post-Project Assessments, & Topical Reports Cement Kiln Flue Gas Recovery Scrubber Project: A DOE Assessment [PDF-246KB] (Nov

  13. Fine particle (2.5 microns) emissions: regulations, measurement, and control

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    John D. McKenna; James H. Turner; James P. McKenna, Jr.

    2008-09-15

    Contents: Introduction; Health effects; Air monitoring; Emission control methods - fabric filter/baghouses, electrostatic precipitators, wet scrubbers; Environmental technology verification and baghouse filtration products; Cost considerations; and Nanoparticulates.

  14. Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants; Volume...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Rich Solvent Rich Solvent Direct Contact Cooler (DCC) and Polishing Scrubber Wash Water Filter DCC Circulating Water Filter Blower Condenser Product CO 2 Overhead...

  15. Hazardous Gases VASILIS M. FTHENAKIS Department of Applied Science

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    confinement, de- inventory, vapor barriers, foam spraying, and water spraysmonitors. ... and active systems (e.g., scrubbers and water curtains). e) Options to prevent or ...

  16. bia-cemkiln | netl.doe.gov

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    (Passamaquoddy Technology, L.P.), Second Annual Clean Coal Technology Conference, Atlanta, GA. U.S. Department of Energy report CONF-9309152. Recovery Scrubber Installation and ...

  17. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) - Data

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    2013 | data from: Electric Power Annual Average flue gas desulfurization (scrubber) costs Release Date: January 30, 2013 | data from: Electric Power Annual Emissions from ...

  18. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... The ability to currently achieve the emission requirements specified in the deep sulfur ... oxygen plant, scrubber, ammonia absorber, water balance, combustion turbine-generator and ...

  19. DOE/EA-2014

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    ... Common air pollution control devices employed on the ORR include exhaust gas scrubbers, fabric filters, and High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filtration systems designed to ...

  20. Microsoft Word - Honeywell_Metropolis Final EA 9-1-10

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ... of dirt, when windy or dry conditions promote problematic fugitive dust emissions. ... a building scrubber with fans, a cooling tower with a fan, and several outdoor pumps. ...

  1. A Framework for Developing Collaborative DER Programs: Working...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... For example, for PM10 abatement, this equipment could involve an entire pollution control system of a scrubber (wetdry), baghouse, fabric collector, or microclone technology. For ...

  2. Y-12_Front Cover_Vol I_Feb2011.ai

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... Another conservative assumption was that wet and dry depositions of all radioactive ... low-sulfur coal, and construction on a scrubber to further reduce sulfur dioxide began ...

  3. untitled

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    ... conventional treatment technologies like scrubber systems and particulate filters, and ... The compressed air system supplies clean, dry, compressed air to the BFC for production ...

  4. DOE/EA-1440-S-1: Final Supplement to the Final Site-Wide Environmental...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... Cyclones Fluidized Bed Steam Reformer Quench & Scrubber Syngas Compression Gas Compression ... Clean Syngas Dry Alcohols Wet Alcohols alcohols, unreacted syngas, CO2, CH4 Thermal ...

  5. Glossary | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    ... Organic compound Organic residuals Other forest land Other removals Other sources Oven dry ... Saplings Saturated steam Screen analysis Scrubber Secondary wood processing mills Shaft ...

  6. 2013 DOE Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) IBR Project Peer...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    size (34"-+- "), dried using boiler exhaust in rotary drum driers, 3-day dry storage. ... point and outlet acceptable for SOx scrubber). Net zero energy import from lignin ...

  7. ARQ08-3.FINAL.indd

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ... Low nitrate & alpha to Liquid Waste Treatment Facility Offgas to two-stage scrubber and ... Actinide Research Quarterly Dry operations The purified plutonium dioxide produced by the ...

  8. 1 | Bioenergy Technologies Office

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... US 2011 Loan interest 8% Feedstock 96 dry US ton Stream factor 90% Internal rate of ... Hammer Mill Turbine Air Compressor Wet Scrubber Pyrolser Feed Screw Catalytic ...

  9. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... a wet flue gas desulfurization scrubber. MEST-H provided lower detection limits for hydrochloric acid than the reference method. Results from a dry stack unit had better ...

  10. Email Template

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ... recycling of LAW off-gas treatment scrubber liquids back to the Pretreatment ... the LAW is processed through supplemental treatment the SSTs will have to be pumped dry. ...

  11. Microsoft Word - KCP Final EA Draft 042913 CLEAN for Concurrence...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ... conventional treatment technologies like scrubber systems and particulate filters, and ... The compressed air system supplies clean, dry, compressed air to the BFC for production ...

  12. Final Site-Wide Environmental Assessment U.S. Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... The zone is designated to be for general research and development with dry laboratories, ... IBRF particulate baghouse and ammonia scrubber system, and the RFHP operations. ...

  13. ColorMac.cdd

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ... de-inventorying both the dry material and liquid inventories within Saltstone. ... Cover (Saltstone) SAS Steam Atomizer Scrubber SAR Safety Analysis Report SB Safety ...

  14. Annual Transuranic Waste Inventory Report - 2013

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ... Waste Stream Description This waste generated at the Rocky Flats Plant consists of dry ... burn chamber and solidified soot and scrubber sludge from the incinerator off-gas ...

  15. Annual Energy Outlook 2014: Electricity Working Group Meeting...

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    particulate requirements * All units without an FGD are required to add a FGD scrubber or dry sorbent injection (DSI) system with a fabric filter * AEO 2014 proposed approach * ...

  16. 1.TIF

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    ... Storage will be in sealed canisters stored in dry cells, with a negative pres- sure ... TO WASTES TO COLLECTION WASTE ATOMIZING OR RECYCLE COLLECTION SCRUBBER -, TO WASTE ...

  17. Microsoft Word - EA-1135.docx

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ... The salts and particulates formed in the dry scrubbing operation subsequently would be ... the gas would pass through two wet scrubber devices with a sorbent, such as caustic ...

  18. Environmental Performance Report 2012: Annual Site Environmental...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... and limited dry laboratory research activities are currently conducted at the facility. ... air permits for two emergency generators and an ammonia scrubber and particulate baghouse. ...

  19. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ... Liquid waste sources could include process condensates, scrubber wastes, spent reagents ... fly ash, slag, and stabilizing chemicals if the dry blend mixture cannot be procured. ...

  20. Microsoft Word - M-2 WTP Contract Section C - Conformed Thru...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ... The primary offgas treatment system consists of a submerged bed scrubber (SBS), a wet ... After cooling, if necessary, the container shall be filled with suitable inert dry filler ...

  1. Sandia R E S E A R H J

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ... goal as a defense laboratory - the spin-dry method took too long to accumulate ... to algae cultivation using a "turf scrubber" to increase the efficiency of ...

  2. Y'

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ... Eighteen dry storage units (five inch diameter aluminum pipes set in concrete) are located ... C and the vapors passed through a scrubber where volatile chlorides were removed ...

  3. app_c6

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ... the melters and the offgas treatment system with its scrubber blowdown processing systems. ... The vitrification system would receive liquid waste, dry calcine, and frit, from separate ...

  4. Microsoft Word - Novolyte Final EA for Concur 11-19-10.docx

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ... Particulate emissions from the salt dryers would be controlled by a scrubber, cyclone, or ... of dirt, when windy or dry conditions promote problematic fugitive dust emissions. ...

  5. DRAFT

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    ... conventional treatment technologies like scrubber systems and particulate filters, and ... The compressed air system supplies clean, dry, compressed air to the BFC for production ...

  6. HTGR Pebble Fuel at SRS E. N. Moore R. H. Jones T. F. Severynse

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ... DOT Department of Transportation DTS Dry Transfer System DWPF Defense Waste ... Security Site SAS Steam Atomizing Scrubber SNM Special Nuclear Material SRNL ...

  7. Text of Plan

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ... Maintenance Cell (CDMC), has been augmented by a carbon dioxide (dry ice) pellet system. ... Beginning January 22, 2000, the Melter Steam Atomized Scrubber flows were shut off, ...

  8. 2014 Annual Site Environmental Report

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... much of the year, but the water infiltrates and evaporates quickly during the dry season. ... Inspections of the Integrated Biorefinery Research Facility ammonia scrubber and ...

  9. Final 2014 Site-Wide Environmental Assessment - South Table Mountain...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ... The zone is designated to be for general research and development with dry laboratories, ... IBRF particulate baghouse and ammonia scrubber system, and the RFHP operations. ...

  10. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ... Liquid-waste sources could include process condensates, scrubber wastes, spent reagents ... It uses the moisture retention capability of the relatively dry soils above the ...

  11. Most Viewed Documents - Biology and Medicine | OSTI, US Dept...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    and dynamics of aptamers: A case study on the malachite green aptamer Wang, Tianjiao (2008) Extremophiles 2004 Frank Robb (2004) Elemental mercury removal using a wet scrubber. ...

  12. Notices

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    control device parameters; (2) bag leak detention systems; (3) maintenance plan for air pollution control devices (e.g., capture system and venturi scrubbers); (4) certification ...

  13. Carbon Nanotube Field Emission Devices - Energy Innovation Portal

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Potential applications include mobile computing and communication devices, LCDs, electrostatic scrubbers for industrial air pollution control, and any applications requiring high ...

  14. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Advanced Technology Vehicles...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Reequipping and Engineering CX(s) Applied: B1.31, B5.1 Date: 09062011 ... Aptera All-Electric and Hybrid Electric Vehicles CX(s) Applied: B1.31, B5.1 Date: 0620...

  15. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Western Area PowerAdministratio...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Reconstruction of the V.T. Hanlon Substation CX(s) Applied: B4.11 Date: 03232015 ... Reconstruction of the V.T. Hanlon Substation CX(s) Applied: B4.11 Date: 03232015 ...

  16. Greenidge Multi-Pollutant Control Project

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Connell, Daniel

    2008-10-18

    The Greenidge Multi-Pollutant Control Project was conducted as part of the U.S. Department of Energy's Power Plant Improvement Initiative to demonstrate an innovative combination of air pollution control technologies that can cost-effectively reduce emissions of SO{sub 2}, NO{sub x}, Hg, acid gases (SO{sub 3}, HCl, and HF), and particulate matter from smaller coal-fired electric generating units (EGUs). There are about 400 units in the United States with capacities of 50-300 MW that currently are not equipped with selective catalytic reduction (SCR), flue gas desulfurization (FGD), or mercury control systems. Many of these units, which collectively represent more than 55 GW of installed capacity, are difficult to retrofit for deep emission reductions because of space constraints and unfavorable economies of scale, making them increasingly vulnerable to retirement or fuel switching in the face of progressively more stringent environmental regulations. The Greenidge Project sought to confirm the commercial readiness of an emissions control system that is specifically designed to meet the environmental compliance requirements of these smaller coal-fired EGUs by offering a combination of deep emission reductions, low capital costs, small space requirements, applicability to high-sulfur coals, mechanical simplicity, and operational flexibility. The multi-pollutant control system includes a NO{sub x}OUT CASCADE{reg_sign} hybrid selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR)/in-duct SCR system for NO{sub x} control and a Turbosorp{reg_sign} circulating fluidized bed dry scrubbing system (with a new baghouse) for SO{sub 2}, SO{sub 3}, HCl, HF, and particulate matter control. Mercury removal is provided as a co-benefit of the in-duct SCR, dry scrubber, and baghouse, and by injection of activated carbon upstream of the scrubber, if required. The multi-pollutant control system was installed and tested on the 107-MW{sub e}, 1953-vintage AES Greenidge Unit 4 by a team including

  17. Detection and treatment of chemical weapons and/or biological pathogens

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Mariella Jr., Raymond P.

    2004-09-07

    A system for detection and treatment of chemical weapons and/or biological pathogens uses a detector system, an electrostatic precipitator or scrubber, a circulation system, and a control. The precipitator or scrubber is activated in response to a signal from the detector upon the detection of chemical weapons and/or biological pathogens.

  18. Development of a Liquid Metal Based Fuel Gas Scrubbing System

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Chang, B.F.; Swithenbank, J.; Sharifi, V.N.; Warner, N.

    2002-09-20

    The objective of this research project is to perform studies on an analogous room temperature packed bed scrubber operating under non-wetting conditions, providing insight and understanding towards the development of a high temperature packed bed gas scrubber irrigated by molten tin.

  19. Compliance testing of Grissom AFB Central Heating Plant coal-fired boilers 3, 4, and 5, Grissom AFB, Indiana. Final report, 29 January-15 February 1989

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Garrison, J.A.

    1989-06-01

    At the request of HQ, SAC/SGPB source compliance testing (particulate and visible emissions) of boilers 3, 4, and 5 in the Grissom AFB Central Heating Plant was accomplished 29 Jan-15 Feb 89. The survey was conducted to determine compliance with regards to Indiana Administrative Code, Title 325 - Air Pollution Control Board, Article 5, Opacity Regulations, and Article 6, Particulate Regulations. Boiler 3 was tested through scrubber B, Boiler 4 through scrubber A, and Boiler 5 through scrubber B and the bypass stack. Results indicate that each boiler met applicable visible and particulate emission standards.

  20. Use of sulfide-containing liquors for removing mercury from flue gases

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Nolan, Paul S.; Downs, William; Bailey, Ralph T.; Vecci, Stanley J.

    2003-01-01

    A method and apparatus for reducing and removing mercury in industrial gases, such as a flue gas, produced by the combustion of fossil fuels, such as coal, adds sulfide ions to the flue gas as it passes through a scrubber. Ideally, the source of these sulfide ions may include at least one of: sulfidic waste water, kraft caustic liquor, kraft carbonate liquor, potassium sulfide, sodium sulfide, and thioacetamide. The sulfide ion source is introduced into the scrubbing liquor as an aqueous sulfide species. The scrubber may be either a wet or dry scrubber for flue gas desulfurization systems.

  1. Apparatus for control of mercury

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Downs, William; Bailey, Ralph T.

    2001-01-01

    A method and apparatus for reducing mercury in industrial gases such as the flue gas produced by the combustion of fossil fuels such as coal adds hydrogen sulfide to the flue gas in or just before a scrubber of the industrial process which contains the wet scrubber. The method and apparatus of the present invention is applicable to installations employing either wet or dry scrubber flue gas desulfurization systems. The present invention uses kraft green liquor as a source for hydrogen sulfide and/or the injection of mineral acids into the green liquor to release vaporous hydrogen sulfide in order to form mercury sulfide solids.

  2. Use of sulfide-containing liquors for removing mercury from flue gases

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Nolan, Paul S.; Downs, William; Bailey, Ralph T.; Vecci, Stanley J.

    2006-05-02

    A method and apparatus for reducing and removing mercury in industrial gases, such as a flue gas, produced by the combustion of fossil fuels, such as coal, adds sulfide ions to the flue gas as it passes through a scrubber. Ideally, the source of these sulfide ions may include at least one of: sulfidic waste water, kraft caustic liquor, kraft carbonate liquor, potassium sulfide, sodium sulfide, and thioacetamide. The sulfide ion source is introduced into the scrubbing liquor as an aqueous sulfide species. The scrubber may be either a wet or dry scrubber for flue gas desulfurization systems.

  3. CX-010375: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace Existing Firehouse CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 09/20/2011 Location(s): California Offices(s): Berkeley Site Office

  4. FE Categorical Exclusions | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    8, 2011 CX-006459: Categorical Exclusion Determination Analytical Physics - Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08082011 Location(s): Albany, Oregon...

  5. CX-012231: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mica Peak Radio Station upgrade CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 06/09/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  6. CX-009515: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Tide Creek Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 11/08/2012 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  7. CX-011215: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Nepese Marsh Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 10/17/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Fermi Site Office

  8. CX-012606: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Preparing of Environmental Samples for Analysis CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41810 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  9. CX-012581: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Demolition of Outfall Sampling Station CX(s) Applied: B1.23Date: 41844 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  10. CX-012572: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    H-Area Vehicle Barrier Installation CX(s) Applied: B1.15Date: 41862 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  11. CX-012566: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Z-Area Fire Tank Painting CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41865 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  12. CX-012628: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Deactivation and Decommissioning of 711-L CX(s) Applied: B1.23Date: 41793 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  13. CX-012559: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Seal Access Plugs at 105-C CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41872 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  14. CX-012587: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    HB-Line Security Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41835 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  15. CX-011194: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Particle Physics Division Outback Garage CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 09/19/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Fermi Site Office

  16. CX-010195: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Polymer Synthesis Lab - Modification CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04/15/2013 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  17. CX-010241: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hydrogen Pathway Analyses CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 02/28/2013 Location(s): Virginia Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  18. CX-012310: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sawmill Creek Stream Bank Erosion CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/06/2014 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Argonne Site Office

  19. CX-012437: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    High Energy Density Lithium Battery CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41878 Location(s): New YorkOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  20. CX-012028: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    High Temperature Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04/21/2014 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  1. CX-011538: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ninemile Creek Lower Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 11/26/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  2. CX-011536: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Aeneans Creek Spring Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 11/25/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  3. CX-011537: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Wanacut Creek Upper Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 11/26/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  4. CX-012793: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    15-Minute Transmission Scheduling CX(s) Applied: B4.4, B4.5Date: 41933 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  5. CX-012110: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Cowlitz Falls Fish Facility Access Agreement Extension CX(s) Applied: A2 Date: 04/02/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  6. CX-009707: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Alcoa Power Sales Contract CX(s) Applied: B4.1 Date: 12/04/2012 Location(s): Oregon, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  7. CX-009513: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Aquatic Invasive Mussels Monitoring CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 10/15/2012 Location(s): CX: none Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  8. CX-013632: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Alcoa Power Sales Contract Amendment CX(s) Applied: B4.11Date: 04/23/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  9. CX-008989: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    State Energy Program CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 08/27/2012 Location(s): Kansas Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  10. CX-008144: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Planned Repair of Flow Lines CX(s) Applied: B5.4 Date: 08/09/2011 Location(s): Wyoming Offices(s): RMOTC

  11. CX-011564: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Excess Facilities Deactivation and Demolition CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 11/05/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  12. CX-012705: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC)-703 Fire Alarm Replacement CX(s) Applied: B2.2Date: 41858 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  13. CX-012725: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Materials and Fuel Complex (MFC)-782 Fire Sprinkler Installation CX(s) Applied: B2.2Date: 41829 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  14. CX-013825: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Lab A19 Cleanroom Construction CX(s) Applied: B1.31Date: 06/29/2015 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  15. CX-014183: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Heyburn Substation Door Replacement CX(s) Applied: B4.6Date: 09/03/2015 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  16. CX-009398: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Domestic Source Recovery CX(s) Applied: B2.6 Date: 11/01/2012 Location(s): New Mexico Offices(s): Los Alamos Site Office

  17. CX-014379: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ouagga Mussel Study Funding CX(s) Applied: B3.16Date: 10/29/2015 Location(s): NevadaOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  18. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: West Virginia | Department...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    ... June 10, 2015 CX-013868: Categorical Exclusion Determination B-33 HVAC Upgrades CX(s) ... Ceramic High Temperature Thermoelectric Heat Exchanger and Heat Recuperators for Power ...

  19. CX-012822: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Santiam-Toledo Structure 39/7 Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41876 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  20. CX-012799: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Malin-Hilltop Wood Pole Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41915 Location(s): CaliforniaOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  1. CX-012805: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Brasada-Harney #1 Wood Pole Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41908 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  2. CX-013386: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Chemical Vapor Deposition CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 01/07/2015 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  3. CX-008724: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Rexburg Bus Lot Lease Termination CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 07/05/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  4. CX-012283: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    USC Autoclave CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/14/2014 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  5. CX-007853: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Arizona Rooftop Challenge (ARC) CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): Arizona Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  6. CX-007864: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Broward County SOLAR Project CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): Florida Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  7. CX-012640: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Lexington-Longview #1 Access Road Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41865 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  8. CX-011065: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Midwest Region Alternative Fuels Project CX(s) Applied: A1 Date: 08/29/2013 Location(s): Kansas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  9. CX-011788: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    I-75 Green Corridor Project CX(s) Applied: A1 Date: 02/10/2014 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  10. CX-007497: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Clean Energy Coalition - Michigan Green Fleets CX(s) Applied: A1 Date: 12/06/2011 Location(s): Michigan Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  11. CX-010938: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Midwest Region Alternative Fuels Project CX(s) Applied: A1 Date: 09/17/2013 Location(s): Kansas, Kansas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  12. CX-011271: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Idaho Petroleum Reduction Leadership Project CX(s) Applied: A1 Date: 09/30/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  13. CX-010514: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Center for Nanoscale Energy CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/24/2013 Location(s): North Dakota Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  14. CX-010756: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Solar Utility Network Deployment Acceleration CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 08/15/2013 Location(s): Virginia Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  15. CX-011102: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    American Solar Transformation Initiative CX(s) Applied: A11 Date: 08/09/2013 Location(s): California Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  16. CX-008543: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Colorado State Energy Plan 2012 CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 06/25/2012 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  17. CX-013794: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Horn Rapids Tap Disconnect Additions CX(s) Applied: B4.6Date: 06/17/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  18. CX-009786: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Beck Road Substation Meter Installation CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 01/07/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  19. CX-010435: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    De Moss Substation Expansion CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 06/03/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  20. CX-012645: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Wenatchee District 2014 Transmission Line Maintenance - Multiple Lines CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41862 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  1. CX-012817: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bell Maintenance Headquarters Access Road Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41890 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  2. CX-010727: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dayton Tap Line Retirement CX(s) Applied: B4.10 Date: 08/13/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  3. CX-011173: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Yaak Substation Transformer Replacement CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 09/18/2013 Location(s): Montana Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  4. CX-010770: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Wildland Fire Chainsaw Training CX(s) Applied: B1.2 Date: 08/01/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  5. FE Categorical Exclusions | Department of Energy

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    FE Categorical Exclusions FE Categorical Exclusions RSS June 4, 2014 CX-011993: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cheniere Marketing, LLC CX(s) Applied: B5.7 Date: 06042014...

  6. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington, D.C. | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Methane and Volatile Organic Carbon (VOC) Emissions Best Practices Database Project CX(s) ... State Energy Efficiency Policy Benchmarking, Technical Assistance, and Sate and ...

  7. CX-009418: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Electron Beam Melting CX(s) Applied: None applied. Date: 10/30/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Kansas City Site Office

  8. CX-013721: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Solar Vacuum Furnace CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 04/28/2015 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  9. CX-009797: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Eni USA Gas Marketing, LLC CX(s) Applied: B5.7 Date: 02/06/2013 Location(s): Louisiana Offices(s): Fossil Energy

  10. CX-013534: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    ENI USA Gas Marketing, LLC CX(s) Applied: B5.7Date: 04/14/2015 Location(s): Multiple LocationsOffices(s): Fossil Energy

  11. CX-012495: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Building 6 Stack Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41855 Location(s): West VirginiaOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  12. CX-010338: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Eugene Substation Fiber Interconnection CX(s) Applied: B4.7 Date: 05/21/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  13. CX-006681: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    New Drilling Location in Section 29CX(s) Applied: B3.1Date: 12/23/2009Location(s): Casper, WyomingOffice(s): RMOTC

  14. CX-011634: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Closure Turf Installation CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 08/27/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Pantex Site Office

  15. CX-008700: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Natapoc Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 06/12/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  16. CX-010398: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Power Line Configuration CX(s) Applied: B4.13 Date: 04/25/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  17. CX-010091: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Power Line Configuration 2013-1 CX(s) Applied: B4.13 Date: 04/15/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  18. CX-011642: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pantex Lake Land Utilization CX(s) Applied: B1.11 Date: 11/05/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Pantex Site Office

  19. CX-003703: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Determination Florida Hydrogen Initiative - Florida Institute of Technology (Interdisciplinary Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technology Academic Program) CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 09...

  20. CX-011239: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Security Upgrades at Multiple Substations CX(s) Applied: ? Date: 10/02/2013 Location(s): Oregon, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  1. CX-010689: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Generic CX Determination for Financial Assistance Awards CX(s) Applied: Unknown Date: 07/17/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Chicago Office

  2. CX-007866: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    SunShot Massachusetts CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): Massachusetts Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  3. CX-010656: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Stormwater Drainage Repair CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/18/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  4. CX-012311: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Accelerator Test Facility II CX(s) Applied: B3.10 Date: 05/28/2014 Location(s): New York Offices(s): Brookhaven Site Office

  5. CX-007400: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Offshore Wind Removing Market Barriers CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 12/07/2011 Location(s): Massachusetts Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  6. CX-010248: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hawaii Renewable Energy Development Venture CX(s) Applied: B5.18 Date: 03/25/2013 Location(s): Hawaii Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  7. CX-009202: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Port Angeles Substation Equipment Additions CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 09/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  8. CX-008179: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Building 09-056 Demolition CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 04/24/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Pantex Site Office

  9. CX-010767: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    University Boulevard Water Meter Installation CX(s) Applied: B2.2 Date: 08/14/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  10. CX-008546: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    National Open-ocean Energy Laboratory CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 06/20/2012 Location(s): Florida Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  11. CX-010587: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mariah Wind CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 07/03/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  12. CX-013629: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Oregon City Station Service Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 04/27/2015 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  13. CX-012655: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Acquisition of Access Road Easements CX(s) Applied: B1.24Date: 41849 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  14. CX-010589: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Nine Canyon Communication Tower Addition CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 07/01/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  15. CX-013446: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Longview Substation Sanitary Sewer Upgrade CX(s) Applied: B4.9Date: 03/25/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  16. CX-010869: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Nauticas Research Program CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/07/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Argonne Site Office

  17. CX-007957: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Geothermal Incentive Program CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 01/30/2012 Location(s): Connecticut Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  18. CX-007880: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Evergreen State Solar Partnership CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  19. CX-007858: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Southwest Solar Transformation Initiative CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  20. CX-007859: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Developing Solar Friendly Communities CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  1. CX-007399: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Offshore Wind Removing Market Barriers CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 12/20/2011 Location(s): Massachusetts Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  2. CX-007779: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Routine Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  3. CX-010734: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Covington District Culvert Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/22/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  4. CX-014180: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bonanza Communication Facility Expansion CX(s) Applied: B1.19Date: 09/10/2015 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  5. CX-014386: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dworshak Passive Repeater project CX(s) Applied: B1.19Date: 10/13/2015 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  6. CX-014382: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Communication Equipment Removals (#WC Projects) CX(s) Applied: B1.19Date: 10/21/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  7. CX-014368: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Haystack Butte Radio Communication Site CX(s) Applied: B1.19Date: 12/07/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  8. CX-013430: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Diffusion Couple Test CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 02/10/2015 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  9. CX-008161: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Prosser Hatchery Backup Generator Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 04/16/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  10. CX-013972: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Slatt Substation Restroom Installation CX(s) Applied: B4.6Date: 08/12/2015 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  11. CX-013423: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Kalispell Maintenance Headquarters Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 01/28/2015 Location(s): MontanaOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  12. CX-013450: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ellensburg Guy Wire Installation CX(s) Applied: B4.9Date: 03/06/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  13. CX-012812: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Chemawa-Salem #1 & #2 Access Road Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41893 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  14. CX-007939: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Midwest Region Alternative Fuels Project CX(s) Applied: A1 Date: 02/16/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  15. CX-009005: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Henderson Solar Energy Project CX(s) Applied: B5.16 Date: 08/22/2012 Location(s): Nevada Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  16. CX-013605: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Electrochemistry Corrosion Testing CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 03/05/2015Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  17. CX-012658: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Chief Joseph and Custer Substations Security Fence Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.11Date: 41843 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  18. CX-008535: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    King County Biogas and Nutrient Reduction CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 05/22/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  19. CX-010532: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Various Demolition Jobs CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 06/07/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Fermi Site Office

  20. CX-012498: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Advanced Light Extraction Structure for OLED Lighting CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41852 Location(s): MarylandOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  1. CX-012317: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    High Performance Computing Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 06/16/2014 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  2. CX-012708: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) Complex Training Trailer CX(s) Applied: B1.15Date: 41844 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  3. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Nationwide | Department...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    ... February 18, 2016 CX-014630: Categorical Exclusion Determination Inspection and Repair of West Hackberry-Sun 42-Inch Crude Oil Pipeline CX(s) Applied: 0 Date: 02182016 ...

  4. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Strategic Petroleum Reserve...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    February 18, 2016 CX-014630: Categorical Exclusion Determination Inspection and Repair of West Hackberry-Sun 42-Inch Crude Oil Pipeline CX(s) Applied: 0 Date: 02182016 ...

  5. CX-007650: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Control Room Consolidation CX(s) Applied: B2.2 Date: 12/29/2011 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  6. CX-001856: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Exclusion Determination Rural Cooperative Geothermal Development Electric and Agriculture CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 04282010 Location(s): Paisley, Oregon Office(s): Energy...

  7. CX-008545: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Solar Energy Evolution and Diffusion Studies CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 06/19/2012 Location(s): CX: none Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  8. CX-011822: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Light Willow Demonstration CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/09/2014 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  9. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Golden Field Office | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Categorical Exclusion Determination U.S. Department of Energy Collegiate Entrepreneurship Prize Award Number: TBD FOA CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 12222014 Location(s): CO...

  10. CX-012656: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    North Bend Communication Site Engine Generator Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41848 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  11. CX-006520: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CX-006520: Categorical Exclusion Determination High Energy Density Distributed Hydrostatic Direct Drive for Large Wind Turbine and Marine Hydro-Kinetic Device Applications CX(s) ...

  12. CX-003608: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CX-003608: Categorical Exclusion Determination Sustainable Algal Energy Production and Environmental Remediation CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 08252010 Location(s): Virginia ...

  13. CX-012278: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Building 36 Use Permit CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 06/23/2014 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  14. CX-012434: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Low Cost Titanium Casting Technology CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41878 Location(s): OhioOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  15. CX-013619: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Upper Lemhi Conservation Easement Acquisition CX(s) Applied: B1.25Date: 05/26/2015 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  16. CX-007778: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Support Buildings CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  17. CX-014376: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ross Complex Road Project CX(s) Applied: B1.32Date: 11/12/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  18. CX-007418: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sidewalks to School CX(s) Applied: B1.13 Date: 12/13/2011 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  19. CX-012602: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sorption of Humate onto SRS Sediment CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41820 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  20. CX-008282: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Biogas Reconditioning Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/01/2012 Location(s): Nevada Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  1. CX-008438: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Biogas Reconditioning Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 06/27/2012 Location(s): Nevada Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  2. CX-012619: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Chromatography and Analytical Sensor Measurements CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41799 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  3. CX-007587: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Gas Chromatography CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/29/2011 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  4. CX-010124: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Chromatography / Mass Spectrometry CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 03/20/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  5. CX-011534: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Grays River Confluence Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 11/08/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  6. CX-011707: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Laser Nanoparticle Lab CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/15/2014 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  7. CX-010699: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    North Boulevard Annex Lease Termination CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 07/11/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  8. CX-007417: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Shift CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/21/2011 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  9. CX-011369: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Relief Valve Test Stand Relocation CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 10/24/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  10. CX-013319: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) Complex Landscaping CX(s) Applied: B5.1Date: 12/16/2014 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  11. CX-012722: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Test Reactor Area (TRA)-653 Conference Room Modifications CX(s) Applied: B1.15Date: 41829 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  12. CX-013463: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Advanced Test Reactor Air Conditioning Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B1.4Date: 02/19/2015 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  13. CX-012724: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) Electronic Message Board Installation CX(s) Applied: B1.7Date: 41830 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  14. CX-009018: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    State Energy Program - Tennessee CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 08/23/2012 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  15. CX-009587: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    City of Houston, Texas CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/12/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  16. CX-013787: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bell Substation HVAC Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 06/30/2015 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  17. CX-009237: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Dow Chemical Company CX(s) Applied: B5.7 Date: 10/02/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Fossil Energy

  18. CX-010578: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Celilo Converter Station Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B4.11 Date: 07/25/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  19. CX-008341: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    A-6 Office Building CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 04/19/2012 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program

  20. CX-012653: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Holcomb-Naselle #1 Access Road Improvements CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41855 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  1. CX-012643: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Chehalis-Covington #1 Access Roads CX(s) Applied: B1.13Date: 41865 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  2. CX-013482: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Administrative Support Complex CX(s) Applied: B1.15Date: 02/26/2015 Location(s): TexasOffices(s): Pantex Site Office

  3. CX-014200: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sagebrush Seedling Planting - ESER CX(s) Applied: B1.20Date: 09/21/2015 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  4. CX-100159 Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Proposed Rulemaking for Energy Conservation Standards for Commercial and Industrial Pumps RIN: 1904-AC54 CX(s) Applied: B5.1

  5. CX-012787: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Nationwide AFV Emergency Responder, Recovery, Reconstruction & Investigation CX(s) Applied: B5.15Date: 41906 Location(s): IllinoisOffices(s): Argonne Site Office

  6. CX-012189: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Microbial Laboratory Analysis CX(s) Applied: B3.12 Date: 05/06/2014 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Argonne Site Office

  7. CX-012195: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Alfalfa Substation Control House Replacement CX(s) Applied: B4.11 Date: 05/02/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  8. CX-010730: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Paisley Geothermal Integration CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 08/09/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  9. CX-008883: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Indian Creek Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 08/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  10. CX-009711: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Tucannon River Substation Expansion Project CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 11/01/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  11. CX-010148: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Merritt Radio Station Upgrade CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 04/18/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  12. CX-014374: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Underwood Tap Structure Relocation CX(s) Applied: B4.13Date: 12/01/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  13. CX-013345: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Plant Accumulators Study CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 12/08/2014 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  14. CX-009543: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sopogy Subcontract CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.15 Date: 11/28/2012 Location(s): Hawaii Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  15. CX-012641: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mossy Rock-Chehalis #1 Access Road Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41865 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  16. CX-009753: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Propane Corridor Development Program CX(s) Applied: B5.22 Date: 12/06/2012 Location(s): Georgia Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  17. CX-014383: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Midway Substation Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B4.6Date: 10/20/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  18. CX-013428: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sempra LNG Marketing, LLC CX(s) Applied: B5.7Date: 01/23/2015 Location(s): LouisianaOffices(s): Fossil Energy

  19. CX-013780: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Troy Substation Tap Yard Expansion CX(s) Applied: B4.11Date: 07/14/2015 Location(s): MontanaOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  20. CX-012482: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mid-Atlantic Regional Infrastructure Development Project CX(s) Applied: B5.22Date: 41862 Location(s): MarylandOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  1. CX-013604: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Corrosion Testing CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 03/05/2015 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  2. CX-011116: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sunpath SANFAB CX(s) Applied: B5.16 Date: 08/09/2013 Location(s): Nevada Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  3. CX-006646: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Restoration South of 54-TPX-10CX(s) Applied: B6.1Date: 02/09/2010Location(s): Casper, WyomingOffice(s): RMOTC

  4. CX-011402: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Apel Steel Corporation CX(s) Applied: B5.16 Date: 11/07/2013 Location(s): Alabama Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  5. CX-012583: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Biofuels Production Experiment CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41841 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  6. CX-008973: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Petrography Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/01/2012 Location(s): West Virginia Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  7. CX-012228: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Deer Park Substation Connection Modifications CX(s) Applied: B4.11 Date: 06/17/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  8. CX-009312: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pecan Street Smart Grid Extension Service CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/30/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  9. CX-012795: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    North Bonneville Substation 23- Kilovolt Line Retermination CX(s) Applied: B4.11Date: 41926 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  10. CX-011628: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Enclosure Modification Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/05/2013 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Y-12 Site Office

  11. CX-012580: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Tritium Responsive Infrastructure Modifications CX(s) Applied: B1.15Date: 41844 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  12. CX-007793: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Jonesboro Maintenance Facility Additions CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 05/10/2011 Location(s): Arkansas Offices(s): Southwestern Power Administration

  13. CX-007798: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Springfield Maintenance Garage CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 12/08/2010 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Southwestern Power Administration

  14. CX-005846: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CX-005846: Categorical Exclusion Determination Wood Pole Replacement and Minor Access Road Maintenance Along Various Transmission Line Rights-Of-Way in the Wenatchee District CX(s) ...

  15. CX-008729: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Reverse Osmosis System Removal CX(s) Applied: B1.26 Date: 06/25/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  16. CX-010515: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Energy Efficiency Public Service Campaign CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 06/14/2013 Location(s): New York Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  17. CX-012188: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Emerald Ash Borer Control CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 05/06/2014 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Argonne Site Office

  18. CX-010768: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    ZIRCEX Nuclear Fuel Dissolution Testing CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/12/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  19. CX-003164: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-003164: Categorical Exclusion Determination Optimization of Biomass Production Across a Landscape CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 07262010...

  20. CX-012254: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hydro Research Foundation University Research Awards - Vanderbilt CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 05/28/2014 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  1. CX-012253: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hydro Research Foundation University Research Awards - OSU CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 05/27/2014 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  2. CX-012118: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hydro Research Foundation University Research Awards - Tufts CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 05/21/2014 Location(s): Georgia Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  3. CX-011416: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Technology Integration Program CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 12/19/2013 Location(s): Ohio Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  4. CX-011535: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    East Grangeville Substation Sale CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 11/14/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  5. CX-012233: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Shed Acquisition at Kalispell Substation CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 06/09/2014 Location(s): Montana Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  6. CX-010157: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Fairmount Substation Equipment Acquisition CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 03/27/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  7. CX-012570: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Install Elevated Fire Water Storage Tank CX(s) Applied: B2.5Date: 41862 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  8. CX-014651: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Chemical Vapor Deposition CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 02/17/2016 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  9. CX-012791: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Grizzly Captain Jack Transmission Line Access Road Acquisition CX(s) Applied: B1.24Date: 41935 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  10. CX-012706: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Radiochemistry Laboratory (RCL) Supply Intake Filter Housing CX(s) Applied: B2.5Date: 41858 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  11. CX-010113: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Compression Stress Relaxometer CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 03/28/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  12. CX-012472: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Technology Integration Program CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.11Date: 41873 Location(s): OhioOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  13. CX-012776: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Catalyst Processing, KCP14-05 CX(s) Applied: NOT NOTEDDate: 41857 Location(s): MissouriOffices(s): Kansas City Site Office

  14. CX-014616: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Biogasification CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 01/12/2016 Location(s): West VirginiaOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  15. CX-009203: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ross Maintenance Headquarters Project CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 09/19/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  16. CX-011686: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ross Communication Tower Fiber Installation CX(s) Applied: B4.7 Date: 01/15/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  17. CX-009198: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ross Transformer Oil Terminal Upgrade CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 09/24/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  18. CX-012808: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    LURR 20140504 Ross Substation Comcast Fiber Installation CX(s) Applied: B4.9Date: 41906 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  19. CX-003520: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    20: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-003520: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pontiac High School Geothermal CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08262010 Location(s): Pontiac, ...

  20. CX-001198: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    98: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-001198: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act: 1010 Avenue of the Arts - New School and Performing Arts Theater CX(s) Applied: ...

  1. CX-013565: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    65: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-013565: Categorical Exclusion Determination Analytical Methods for Radiochemical Measurements CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04162015 ...

  2. CX-003936: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    36: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-003936: Categorical Exclusion Determination Hawaii Energy Sustainability Program (Subtask 2.3.1: Hydrogen Research and Development) CX(s) ...

  3. CX-012557: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    557: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-012557: Categorical Exclusion Determination Electrodepositon of Molybdenum, NickelMolybdenum alloy, Cesium, and Strontium CX(s) Applied: ...

  4. CX-001199: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    9: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-001199: Categorical Exclusion Determination Tennessee Energy Efficient Schools Initiative Ground Source Heat Pump Program CX(s) Applied: ...

  5. CX-000703: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    03: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-000703: Categorical Exclusion Determination Maryland - Clean Energy Economic Development Initiative (CEEDI) CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, ...

  6. CX-010117: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    10117: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-010117: Categorical Exclusion Determination Analytical Methods for Radiochemical Measurements CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 03282013 ...

  7. CX-010510: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    510: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-010510: Categorical Exclusion Determination Rapid Freeform Sheet Metal Forming: Technology Development and System Verification CX(s) ...

  8. CX-004024: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    24: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-004024: Categorical Exclusion Determination Backside Contact Multijunction Solar Cells for High Concentration Applications CX(s) Applied: ...

  9. CX-100275 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    75 Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-100275 Categorical Exclusion Determination High Performance Building Envelope Assemblies Award Number: DE- EE0007054, 7059, 7060 CX(s) ...

  10. CX-007550: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Kearney - Waste Water Treatment Plant CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 01/10/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  11. CX-012788: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Bio-Aviation Fuel LCA with GREET CX(s) Applied: B5.15Date: 41906 Location(s): IllinoisOffices(s): Argonne Site Office

  12. CX-012474: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Refractories/Ceramics Project CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41870 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  13. CX-008797: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Coal Pile Basin Project CX(s) Applied: B1.29 Date: 06/04/2012 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Y-12 Site Office

  14. CX-010742: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Integrated Simulation Development and Decision Support CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/15/2013 Location(s): California Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  15. CX-012730: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace West Hackberry Radio Tower CX(s) Applied: B1.19Date: 41880 Location(s): LouisianaOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  16. CX-012531: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Distributed Wireless Antenna Sensors for Boiler Condition CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41836 Location(s): CaliforniaOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  17. CX-013309: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Burns Communication Site Upgrade CX(s) Applied: B4.6Date: 01/13/2015 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  18. CX-012539: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Distributed Wireless Antenna Sensors for Boiler Condition CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41836 Location(s): TexasOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  19. CX-008146: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Advanced Formation Evaluator Tools (Haliburton) CX(s) Applied: B3.7 Date: 09/11/2011 Location(s): Wyoming Offices(s): RMOTC

  20. CX-013417: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Trentwood Substation Communication Upgrade CX(s) Applied: B1.19Date: 02/11/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  1. CX-013389: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Plutonium Characteristics CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 01/07/2015 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  2. CX-013521: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Chemical Oxygen Demand CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 02/03/2015 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  3. CX-010323: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Modify Sprinkler System CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 04/15/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  4. Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CX(s) Applied: DOEEA-1914 National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Date: 072815 Location(s): CO Office(s): Golden Field Office July 21, 2015 CX-100313...

  5. FE Categorical Exclusions | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Investigation of Cathode Electrocatalytic Activity using Surfaced Engineered Thin Film Samples CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09082011 Location(s): Pittsburgh,...

  6. CX-011626: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Line Yard Fence Project CX(s) Applied: B1.11 Date: 06/05/2013 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Y-12 Site Office

  7. CX-011630: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    9831 Wall Construction Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/05/2013 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Y-12 Site Office

  8. CX-011184: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Salmon Creek Pond Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 08/29/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  9. CX-010772: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Water Security Test Bed (WSTB) CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/17/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  10. CX-014570: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    TAN - Monitoring Well Drilling Actions CX(s) Applied: B3.1Date: 04/29/2015 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  11. CX-013710: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    SAF-D Project CX(s) Applied: A9Date: 05/26/2015 Location(s): MissouriOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  12. CX-012813: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Redmond-Pilot Butte #1 Wood Pole Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41893 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  13. CX-012816: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Rogue-Gold Beach Access Road Improvement CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41890 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  14. CX-009132: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Landfill Gas Utilization Plant CX(s) Applied: B5.21 Date: 08/02/2012 Location(s): New York Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  15. CX-009542: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Solar Parks Project CX(s) Applied: B5.16 Date: 11/09/2012 Location(s): Florida Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  16. CX-012796: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Big Eddy-Redmond #1 Wood Pole Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41919 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  17. CX-012038: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Deepwater Reverse-Circulation Primary Cementing CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 04/17/2014 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  18. CX-009159: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Montana Formaul State Energy Program CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 09/06/2012 Location(s): Montana Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  19. CX-012433: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Computer Simulation and Prototype Construction and Testing CX(s) Applied: A9Date: 41878 Location(s): GeorgiaOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  20. CX-012636: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Woodward Meadows Property Acquisition Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25Date: 41876 Location(s): MontanaOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  1. CX-004247: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Exclusion Determination CX-004247: Categorical Exclusion Determination Carolina Blue Skies Initiative CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1 Date: 10142010 Location(s): Indian Trail,...

  2. CX-011712: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Midwest Region Alternative Fuels Project CX(s) Applied: A1 Date: 01/08/2014 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  3. CX-100160 Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Proposed Rulemaking for Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Dehumidifiers RIN: 1904-AC81 CX(s) Applied: B5.1

  4. CX-009325: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Microbiology Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 10/01/2012 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  5. CX-010258: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bangladesh Meteorological Instrumentation Installation CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 04/26/2013 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  6. CX-009617: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Gas Mass Spectrometry CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/07/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  7. CX-008203: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Energize Missouri HUG Demoret CX(s) Applied: B5.19 Date: 03/23/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  8. CX-008241: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Energize Missouri HUG Teter CX(s) Applied: B5.19 Date: 05/15/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  9. CX-008205: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Energize Missouri HUG Weaver CX(s) Applied: B5.19 Date: 03/23/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  10. CX-007407: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Advanced Floating Turbine CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 12/07/2011 Location(s): Ohio Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  11. CX-011189: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Naselle Ridge Emergency Generator Replacement CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 08/26/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  12. CX-010693: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Conversion of Waste Carbon Dioxide and Shale Gas to High Value Chemicals CX(s) Applied: ... lower energy content, carbon footprint, and cost than today's petrochemical versions. ...

  13. CX-010797: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Serration Behavior of High Entropy Alloys CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/14/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  14. CX-007833: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Energy Retrofits CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 11/29/2011 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  15. CX-011753: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CX-011753: Categorical Exclusion Determination LanzaTech Inc. - Process Intensification of Biological Natural Gas Conversion through Novel Bioreactors Designs CX(s) Applied: B3.6 ...

  16. CX-007795: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Easement Acquisition, Carroll County, Arkansas CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 02/07/2011 Location(s): Arkansas Offices(s): Southwestern Power Administration

  17. CX-007794: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Grandview, Arkansas Interconnection CX(s) Applied: B4.12 Date: 04/08/2011 Location(s): Arkansas Offices(s): Southwestern Power Administration

  18. CX-009698: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sale of Lakeside Radio Station CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 12/27/2012 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  19. CX-014365: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ferry Butte Communication Facility Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B1.19Date: 12/10/2015 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  20. CX-008691: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mason Substation Metering Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 06/25/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  1. CX-014366: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Chemawa Substation Wireless Communication Facility CX(s) Applied: B1.19Date: 12/08/2015 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  2. CX-013798: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bellingham Substation Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 06/11/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  3. CX-012313: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Chicago Office Technical Support Services Contract CX(s) Applied: A8 Date: 06/13/2014 Location(s): CX: none Offices(s): Chicago Office

  4. CX-007517: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    UPF Mock Wall Project CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/29/2011 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Y-12 Site Office

  5. CX-010717: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Moodys Radio Tower Land Acquisition CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 07/15/2013 Location(s): Oklahoma Offices(s): Southwestern Power Administration

  6. CX-008588: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    St. Petersburg Solar Pilot Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 07/19/2012 Location(s): Florida Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  7. CX-014697: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Zinc Bromide Removal CX(s) Applied: B1.28Date: 12/15/2015 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  8. CX-012728: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    BHP-3 Offsite Bump Repair CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41885 Location(s): TexasOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  9. CX-007869: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Solar Ready KC CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  10. CX-013324: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Wear Laboratory CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6Date: 01/16/2015 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  11. CX-012097: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Microgrid Demonstration Project CX(s) Applied: B5.15 Date: 03/24/2014 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  12. CX-009630: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    ICP Routine Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 11/06/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  13. CX-014387: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Eagle Fish Hatchery Maintenance Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 10/13/2015 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  14. CX-002452: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Assessment of the Environmental Effects of Hydrokinetic Turbines on Fish CX(s) Applied: ... to determine injury and survival rates for fish passing through hydrokinetic turbines. ...

  15. CX-011069: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Induction Furnace Melting CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/29/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  16. CX-006211: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Exclusion Determination Missouri Independent Energy Efficiency Program: Henniges Automotive - Process Air Compressor Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 07182011 Location(s):...

  17. CX-013796: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Chehalis District Access Road Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B4.6Date: 06/15/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  18. CX-013513: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Heavy Mineral Separation CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 02/05/2015 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  19. CX-011165: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Heavy Mineral Separation CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/07/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  20. CX-008215: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Small Hydropower Research and Development Technology Project CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 04/03/2012 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  1. CX-012006: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minto Lodge Rehabilitation CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/15/2014 Location(s): Alaska Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  2. CX-013823: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (EVI) Laboratory Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B1.31Date: 06/18/2015 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  3. CX-013464: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Bond Strength Laser Shock Testing CX(s) Applied: B1.31Date: 02/18/2015 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  4. CX-014404: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Microgrid Research Laboratory Remodel CX(s) Applied: B1.31Date: 11/30/2015 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  5. CX-012716: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    General Scientific Infrastructure Support for University of Wisconsin CX(s) Applied: B1.31Date: 41844 Location(s): WisconsinOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  6. CX-012718: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Idaho State University Reactor Laboratory Modernization CX(s) Applied: B1.31Date: 41844 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  7. CX-011368: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    High Temperature Thermal Properties CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 10/23/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  8. CX-100327 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CX-100327 Categorical Exclusion Determination Proposed Rulemaking for Energy Conservation Standards for Commercial Water Heating Equipment RIN: 1904-AD34 CX(s)...

  9. CX-009850: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pittsburgh Nanomaterials Preparation Lab CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/29/2013 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  10. CX-008803: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Milling Machine Replacement Projects CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 05/14/2012 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Y-12 Site Office

  11. CX-012620: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Grout Preparation CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41799 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  12. CX-011408: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Wyandotte Integrated Renewable Energy Strategy 2 CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 11/20/2013 Location(s): Michigan Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  13. CX-013653: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Alberton Radio Site Construction CX(s) Applied: B1.19Date: 04/06/2015 Location(s): MontanaOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  14. CX-100421 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    21 Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-100421 Categorical Exclusion Determination Wastewater Treatment Plant Grant - Marion Utilities FOA Number: DE-FOA-0001479 CX(s) Applied: ...

  15. CX-008999: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Program Year 2012 Formula Grants CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 08/22/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  16. CX-010582: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Spring Creek Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 07/16/2013 Location(s): Montana Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  17. CX-011131: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Puget Sound Pilot Tidal Energy Project CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/13/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  18. CX-013415: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hardeson Battery Generator Integration CX(s) Applied: B4.11Date: 02/25/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  19. CX-011244: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hardeson Small Generator Integration CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 09/25/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  20. CX-008882: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sno-King Substation Expansion CX(s) Applied: B4.11 Date: 08/08/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  1. CX-007414: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Optimized Ports Assessment CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 12/20/2011 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  2. CX-012647: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Kalispell District 2014 Transmission Line Maintenance - Multiple Lines CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41862 Location(s): MontanaOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  3. CX-012436: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    System Reliability Model for SSL Luminaires CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41878 Location(s): AlabamaOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  4. CX-011401: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minto Lodge Rehabilitation CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 11/19/2013 Location(s): Alaska Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  5. CX-010237: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pittsburgh Green Innovators Synergy Center CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 02/28/2013 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  6. CX-012621: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace 730-2B Roof CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41799 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  7. CX-012622: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace roofing system at 702-F CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41799 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  8. CX-010512: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Blackfeet Energy Efficiency Retrofits CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 06/03/2013 Location(s): Montana Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  9. CX-007571: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pulaski County - Wastewater CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/29/2011 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  10. CX-012560: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    "Repaint Fire Tank 915-K CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 41871 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office"

  11. CX-014315: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Discharge Assisted Digestion CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 08/14/2015 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  12. CX-011214: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sensitive Instrument Facility CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/10/2013 Location(s): Iowa Offices(s): Ames Site Office

  13. CX-009272: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Building 94 Facade Restoration CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 09/10/2012 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  14. CX-009295: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Energy Regional Innovation Cluster CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/05/2012 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  15. CX-010951: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Automotive Technology Analysis CX(s) Applied: A8 Date: 09/17/2013 Location(s): Virginia Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  16. CX-013451: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Garrison Substation Equipment Acquisition CX(s) Applied: B1.7Date: 03/02/2015 Location(s): MontanaOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  17. CX-013310: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Chemawa Substation Equipment Acquisition CX(s) Applied: B1.7Date: 01/06/2015 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  18. CX-014185: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Conkelley Substation Property Transfers CX(s) Applied: B1.24Date: 08/27/2015 Location(s): MontanaOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  19. CX-011110: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Advancements in Algal Biomass Yield CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/29/2013 Location(s): Hawaii Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  20. CX-007382: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Compressed Natural Gas Manufacturing CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 10/26/2011 Location(s): Wisconsin Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  1. CX-009552: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Central Vermont Recovered Biomass Facility CX(s) Applied: B5.20 Date: 11/28/2012 Location(s): Vermont Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  2. CX-007882: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Wisconsin Solar Market Transformation CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): Wisconsin Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  3. CX-007893: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    SunShot Massachusetts CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 02/10/2012 Location(s): Massachusetts Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  4. CX-010341: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Chandler Tap Line Reconductoring CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 05/17/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  5. CX-011250: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Determination Transforming Photovoltaic Installations Toward Dispatchable, Schedulable Energy Solutions CX(s) Applied: B3.6, B5.15 Date: 10172013 Location(s): Oregon...

  6. CX-008695: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Munro Control Center Expansion CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 06/21/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  7. CX-012172: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Repackage Lead Shot CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 04/14/2014 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  8. CX-012727: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    CHPRC Cleanup Actions CX(s) Applied: B6.1Date: 41849 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  9. CX-013788: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Puget Sound Energy Fiber Connection CX(s) Applied: B1.42Date: 06/30/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  10. CX-013969: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Kennewick Radio Station HVAC Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.4Date: 08/24/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  11. CX-008234: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Whole Energy Glycerin Refinery CX(s) Applied: B5.15 Date: 04/20/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  12. CX-010155: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Augspurger Radio Tower Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 04/03/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  13. CX-008683: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Shaniko Radio Station Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 07/11/2012 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  14. CX-011190: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Alberton Communication Site Construction CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 08/26/2013 Location(s): Montana Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  15. CX-008926: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Texas Alternative Fuel Vehicle Pilot Program CX(s) Applied: A1 Date: 08/24/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  16. CX-011237: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Lightspeed Networks Inc. Fiber Installation CX(s) Applied: B4.9 Date: 10/24/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  17. CX-007613: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Next Generation Ultra Lean Burn Powertrain CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 01/10/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  18. CX-012200: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Determination of Excess Real Property CX(s) Applied: B1.36 Date: 05/01/2014 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Legacy Management

  19. CX-012818: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    La Pine-Chiloquin Wood Pole Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41887 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  20. CX-012512: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Amber Kinetics Flywheel Energy Storage Demonstration CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41848 Location(s): CaliforniaOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory