Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "ii compliance standards" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Environmental Compliance Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

56-2011 56-2011 June 2011 DOE STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; further dissemination unlimited. (Unclassified Unlimited) DOE-STD-1156-2011 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ DOE-STD-1156-2011 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENT v PURPOSE 1 APPLICABILITY 1 IMPLEMENTATION 2 EVALUATION REQUIREMENTS 3 INITIAL QUALIFICATION AND TRAINING 5

2

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Environmental Compliance Qualification Standard Reference Guide DECEMBER 2011 Table of Contents i LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... iii ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ iv PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ........................................................................................................................................... 1

3

II. GENERAL COMPLIANCE SUPPLEMENT INTRODUCTION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Rather than repeat these compliance requirements, audit objectives, and suggested audit procedures for each program, they are provided once in this part. For each program in this Compliance Supplement (this Supplement), the program-specific compliance guidance section (Part III of this guidance) contains additional information about the compliance requirements that arise from laws and regulations applicable to each program, including the requirements specific to each program that should be tested using the guidance in this part. Compliance Requirements, Audit Objectives, and Suggested Audit Procedures At the end of this General Compliance Supplement is a matrix that outlines the compliance requirements, including special tests and provisions, that are applicable to programs performed under

4

II. GENERAL COMPLIANCE SUPPLEMENT INTRODUCTION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A. ACTIVITIES ALLOWED OR UNALLOWED Compliance Requirements The specific requirements for activities allowed or unallowed are unique to each DOE Federal award or program and are found in the laws, regulations, and the provisions of contract or grant agreements pertaining to the program. In addition, ARRA has established a cross-cutting unallowable activity for all ARRA-funded awards. Pursuant to Section 1604 of ARRA, none of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available in ARRA may be used by any State or local government, or any private entity, for any casino or other gambling establishment, aquarium, zoo, golf course, or swimming pool. Source of Governing Requirements The requirements for activities allowed or unallowed are contained in program legislation or, as

5

Part II, General Compliance Supplement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A. ACTIVITIES ALLOWED OR UNALLOWED Compliance Requirements The specific requirements for activities allowed or unallowed are unique to each DOE Federal award or program and are found in the laws, regulations, and the provisions of contract or grant agreements pertaining to the program. In addition, ARRA has established a cross-cutting unallowable activity for all ARRA-funded awards. Pursuant to Section 1604 of ARRA, none of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available in ARRA may be used by any State or local government, or any private entity, for any casino or other gambling establishment, aquarium, zoo, golf course, or swimming pool. Source of Governing Requirements The requirements for activities allowed or unallowed are contained in program legislation or, as

6

EO 12088: Federal Compliance with Pollution Control Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

088-Federal Compliance with Pollution Control Standards 088-Federal Compliance with Pollution Control Standards SOURCE: The provisions of Executive Order 12088 of October 13,1978, appear at 43 FR 47707, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 243, unless otherwise noted. By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and statutes of the United States of America, including Section 22 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2621), Section 313 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1323), Section 1447 of the Public Health Service Act, as amended by the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300j-6), Section 118of the Clean Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 7418(b)), Section 4 of the Noise Control Act of 1972 (42 U.S.C. 4903), Section 6001 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6961), and Section 301 of Title 3 of the United

7

Compliance and Verification of Standards and Labelling Programs in China: Lessons Learned  

SciTech Connect

After implementing several energy efficiency standards and labels (30 products covered by MEPS, 50 products covered by voluntary labels and 19 products by mandatory labels), the China National Institute of Standardization (CNIS) is now implementing verification and compliance mechanism to ensure that the energy information of labeled products comply with the requirements of their labels. CNIS is doing so by organizing check testing on a random basis for room air-conditioners, refrigerators, motors, heaters, computer displays, ovens, and self -ballasted lamps. The purpose of the check testing is to understand the implementation of the Chinese labeling scheme and help local authorities establishing effective compliance mechanisms. In addition, to ensure robustness and consistency of testing results, CNIS has coordinated a round robin testing for room air conditioners. Eight laboratories (Chinese (6), Australian (1) and Japanese (1)) have been involved in the round robin testing and tests were performed on four sets of samples selected from manufacturer?s production line. This paper describes the methodology used in undertaking both check and round robin testing, provides analysis of testing results and reports on the findings. The analysis of both check and round robin testing demonstrated the benefits of a regularized verification and monitoring system for both laboratories and products such as (i) identifying the possible deviations between laboratories to correct them, (ii) improving the quality of testing facilities, (iii) ensuring the accuracy and reliability of energy label information in order to strength the social credibility of the labeling program and the enforcement mechanism in place.

Saheb, Yamina; Zhou, Nan; Fridley, David; Pierrot, Andr& #233

2010-06-11T23:59:59.000Z

8

PCI Compliance: Understand and Implement Effective PCI Data Security Standard Compliance, 2nd edition  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Identity theft and other confidential information theft have now topped the charts as the #1 cybercrime. In particular, credit card data is preferred by cybercriminals. Is your payment processing secure and compliant? Now in its second edition, PCI Compliance ...

Anton Chuvakin; Branden R. Williams

2009-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

9

An Expert System for Determining Compliance with the Texas Building Energy Design Standard  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Demonstration of compliance with the Texas Building Energy Conservation Design Standard involves completion of a summary checklist for each of its sections. This manual checking is tedious. Furthermore, no comprehensive documentation of the user...

Doan, E. C.; Hunn, B. D.; Jones, J. W.; Gatton, T. M.

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

10

American Petroleum Institute (API) Standard 653 compliance program for aboveground storage tanks  

SciTech Connect

With increased pressure from federal regulators to inspect and maintain aboveground storage tanks -- and with no specific guidelines in API (American Petroleum Institute) Standard 653, Tank Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and Reconstruction -- the need to develop an effective compliance program is warranted. Although many programs can be developed to comply with API Standard 653, this paper presents one interpretation of the document. An API Standard 653 compliance program has several components, including inspection scheduling, engineering evaluations, documentation, repairs and alterations, and the possibility of hydrotesting. Each of these components is integral to the other. Effective coordination of these activities will minimize tank downtime.

Butler, D.M.; Stadler, P.M. (Chicago Bridge Iron Co., Oak Brook, IL (United States))

1994-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

11

Statistical aspects of determining compliance with radiation standards  

SciTech Connect

Radiation surveys are an important tool used to monitor the safety of operations at nuclear fuel cycle facilities, as well as determining if contaminated sites require remedial action before license termination or unrestricted release. It is important that radiation surveys are carefully designed to provide the right quantity and quality of useful information for making valid decisions concerning public safety. The validity of survey information is especially important when low-level radiation detection techniques are required such as for environmental radiation monitoring. Thus, statistical aspects of radiation surveys are important in demonstrating compliance with radiation guidelines and for deciding when remedial action or cleanup is required. In this paper, we discuss the statistical aspects of evaluating whether guidelines are, in fact, being exceeded.

Kennedy, W.E. Jr.; Kinnison, R.R.; Gilbert, R.O.; Watson, E.C.

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

12

Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement Powerpoint Presentation for ASHRAE Conference, January 31, 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document is Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement Powerpoint Presentation for ASHRAE Conference, January 31, 2011

13

Plenary II -- Track Safety Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TSS 2001 A TSS 2001 A V 1.0 1 Federal Railroad Administration Track Safety Standards (TSS) 49 CFR Part 213 Subpart A - General Excepted Track & Classes 1 - 5 Overview TSS 2001 A V 1.0 2 Presentation Notes * This presentation is intended to provide guidance in broad terms. It is not intended to serve as a complete explanation of the regulations or as a substitute for application of the regulations to specific facts. * With the exception of definitions, each section shown in this presentation are brief summaries of the regulation text. User must consult the complete regulation documentation when necessary. * This presentation is based on the Final Rule published in the Federal Register June 22, 1998, Vol. 63, No. 119, [Docket RST-90-1, Notice 8] effective Sept. 21, 1998 and

14

The COMPLY computer program for demonstrating compliance with national radionuclide air emission standards  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed national radionuclide air emission standards for a number of source categories. One of these standards applies to Nuclear Regulatory Commission Licensees and non-Department of Energy facilities having the potential to release radionuclides to the atmosphere. Approximately 6000 facilities are subject to the standard, which limits the effective whole-body dose commitment to the maximally exposed individual from radionuclide releases to the atmosphere. A computer program to assist the regulated community in determining compliance has been developed by the EPA's Office of Radiation Programs. The computer program COMPLY calculates the dose to an individual residing outside the facility. The program considers dose from inhalation, ingestion of contaminated food, air immersion, and ground deposition. It is based on models developed by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP). Compliance procedures provided in COMPLY are designed to reduce the burden on the regulated community. The approach begins with simple-to-use methods that are very conservative in determining compliance. The methods become progressively less conservative but more complicated at succeeding levels. Each higher level requires the input of site-specific information, but allows a more realistic estimate of dose. This paper describes the COMPLY program, and provides estimates of the work required and the degree of conservatism in the dose computed at each level.

Colli, A.; Beal, S.; Loomis, D. (Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC (USA))

1990-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

15

Inspectors general: Compliance with professional standards by the EPA Inspector General  

SciTech Connect

Statutory offices of inspectors general play an important role in preventing and detecting fraud and abuse, and in promoting economy, efficiency, and effectiveness in federal programs and operations. The Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Inspector General satisfactorily complied with 20 of 23 audit and investigation standards GAO used in assessing the OIG's operations. However, corrective actions are needed to bring the OIG into satisfactory compliance with certain aspects of 3 standards in the areas of evaluating and reporting on internal control systems, gathering evidence to support audit report statements, and developing an annual investigation plan.

Not Available

1986-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

16

TR-IIS-06-006 Compliance Enforcement of  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

.Y. Yu, P.C. Hsiu, C.S. Shih, J.W.S. Liu May 29, 2006 || Technical Report No. TR-IIS-06-006 http. Shih, Member, IEEE, J. W. S. Liu, Fellow, IEEE Abstract--Medication dispensers treated in this paper University, Taipei, Taiwan. Their email addresses are {r94922048, r91004, cshih}@csie.nthu.edu.tw. J. W. S

Chen, Sheng-Wei

17

PARS II Standard Operating Procedure Business Rules  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 25, 2011 June 25, 2011 U.S. Department of Energy The PARS II Standard Operating Procedure is a "living document" and will be updated on an ongoing basis. Comments or suggestions are welcome and should be forwarded to the PARS II administrator at PARSIIsupportoecm@hq.doe.gov. Notes Comment Pages Comment Pages Index Screenshot Pages Introduction I-1 Generic Business Rules I-2 Select Project I-3 - I-5 Enter/Modify Project Information I-6 - I-15 Enter/Modify Contact Information I-16 - I-21 Creating a Project I-22 Enter CD0 Information I-23 - I-26 Enter CD1 Information I-27 - I-29 Enter CD2 Information I-30 - I-33 Enter CD3A Information I-34 - I-36 Enter CD3 Information I-37 - I-39 Enter CD4 Information I-40 - I-42 Enter Closeout Information I-43 - I-45 Enter BCP Information I-46 - I-50 Screenshot

18

DOE-STD-1156-2002; Environmental Compliance Function Area Qualification Standard  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6-2002 6-2002 October 2002 DOE STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1156-2002 This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1156-2002

19

Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement Powerpoint Presentation for ASHRAE Conference, January 31, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Buildings Regulatory Program Buildings Regulatory Program Buildings Regulatory Program Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement John Cymbalsky, Ashley Armstrong, and Laura Barhydt US Department of Energy January 31, 2011 Presentation Outline Presentation Outline * Upcoming Relevant Rulemakings * Changes to Rulemaking Process * Executive Order 13563 * Overview of Compliance, Certification, and Enforcement * Detailed Questions and Answers 2 | U.S. Department of Energy energy.gov Long Term Schedules for Certain HVAC Rulemakings Long Term Schedules for Certain HVAC Rulemakings Appliance Standards Product Categories Driver Approx. Rule Initiation Date Final Action Date Heating Products Rulemakings Residential Water Heaters, Direct Heating Equipment, and Pool

20

Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement Powerpoint Presentation for ASHRAE Conference, January 31, 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Buildings Regulatory Program Buildings Regulatory Program Buildings Regulatory Program Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement John Cymbalsky, Ashley Armstrong, and Laura Barhydt US Department of Energy January 31, 2011 Presentation Outline Presentation Outline * Upcoming Relevant Rulemakings * Changes to Rulemaking Process * Executive Order 13563 * Overview of Compliance, Certification, and Enforcement * Detailed Questions and Answers 2 | U.S. Department of Energy energy.gov Long Term Schedules for Certain HVAC Rulemakings Long Term Schedules for Certain HVAC Rulemakings Appliance Standards Product Categories Driver Approx. Rule Initiation Date Final Action Date Heating Products Rulemakings Residential Water Heaters, Direct Heating Equipment, and Pool

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "ii compliance standards" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Microsoft PowerPoint - NERC Reliability Standards and Mandatory Compliance Presentation to Hydro-Power Conference - June 2007.p  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

NERC Reliability NERC Reliability NERC Reliability NERC Reliability Standards and Standards and Mandatory Compliance Mandatory Compliance Hydro Hydro - - Power Conference Power Conference June 13, 2007 June 13, 2007 Stan Mason Stan Mason 2 EPACT 2005 EPACT 2005 Congress approved the related legislation Congress approved the related legislation in August 2005 in August 2005 It required creation of an Electric It required creation of an Electric Reliability Organization (ERO) to be Reliability Organization (ERO) to be approved by the Federal Energy approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Regulatory Commission (FERC) It mandated Standards that would be It mandated Standards that would be approved by FERC with financial sanctions approved by FERC with financial sanctions

22

The Costs and Benefits of Compliance with Renewable Portfolio Standards: Reviewing Experience to Date  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

2012). In 2010, energy suppliers reported 100% complianceYork. In New York, energy suppliers contracted through RPSon data reported by energy suppliers. NYSERDA estimated the

Heeter, Jenny

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

23

Assessment of compliance with ground water protection standards in the 2008 performance assessment for the proposed high-level radioactive waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract Extensive work has been carried out by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in the development of a proposed geologic repository at Yucca Mountain (YM), Nevada, for the disposal of high-level radioactive waste. In support of this development and an associated license application to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the DOE completed an extensive performance assessment (PA) for the proposed YM repository in 2008. This presentation describes the assessment of compliance with ground water protection standards in the 2008 YM PA. The following topics are addressed: (i) regulatory background, (ii) analysis structure including characterization of uncertainty, and (iii) analysis results for each of the ground water protection standards. The present article is part of a special issue of Reliability Engineering and System Safety devoted to the 2008 YM PA; additional articles in the issue describe other aspects of the 2008 YM PA.

C.W. Hansen; G.A. Behie; K.M. Brooks; Y. Chen; J.C. Helton; S.P. Hommel; K.P. Lee; B. Lester; P.D. Mattie; S. Mehta; S.P. Miller; C.J. Sallaberry; S.D. Sevougian; M. Wasiolek

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

24

Federal and State Workplace Posters Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) http://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/compliance/posters/flsa.htm  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Federal and State Workplace Posters 1/21/2014 Federal · Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) http://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/compliance/posters/flsa.htm · Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) http://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/compliance/posters/fmla.htm · Employee Polygraph Protection Act (EPPA) http://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/compliance/posters/eppa.htm · Equal Employment

25

Evaluation of the WIPP Project`s compliance with the EPA radiation protection standards for disposal of transuranic waste  

SciTech Connect

The US Environmental Protection Agency`s (EPA) proposed rule to certify that the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) meets compliance with the long-term radiation protection standards for geologic repositories (40CFR191 Subparts B and C), is one of the most significant milestones to date for the WIPP project in particular, and for the nuclear waste issue in general. The Environmental Evaluation Group (EEG) has provided an independent technical oversight for the WIPP project since 1978, and is responsible for many improvements in the location, design, and testing of various aspects of the project, including participation in the development of the EPA standards since the early 1980s. The EEG reviewed the development of documentation for assessing the WIPP`s compliance by the Sandia National Laboratories following the 1985 promulgation by EPA, and provided many written and verbal comments on various aspects of this effort, culminating in the overall review of the 1992 performance assessment. For the US Department of Energy`s (DOE) compliance certification application (CCA), the EEG provided detailed comments on the draft CCA in March, 1996, and additional comments through unpublished letters in 1997 (included as Appendices 8.1 and 8.2 in this report). Since the October 30, 1997, publication of the EPA`s proposed rule to certify WIPP, the EEG gave presentations on important issues to the EPA on December 10, 1997, and sent a December 31, 1997 letter with attachments to clarify those issues (Appendix 8.3). The EEG has raised a number of questions that may have an impact on compliance. In spite of the best efforts by the EEG, the EPA reaction to reviews and suggestions has been slow and apparently driven by legal considerations. This report discusses in detail the questions that have been raised about containment requirements. Also discussed are assurance requirements, groundwater protection, individual protection, and an evaluation of EPA`s responses to EEG`s comments.

Neill, R.H.; Chaturvedi, L.; Rucker, D.F.; Silva, M.K.; Walker, B.A.; Channell, J.K.; Clemo, T.M. [Environmental Evaluation Group, Albuquerque, NM (United States)] [Environmental Evaluation Group, Albuquerque, NM (United States); [Environmental Evaluation Group, Carlsbad, NM (United States)

1998-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

26

High level waste storage tank farms/242-A evaporator standards/requirements identification document phase 1 assessment corrective actions/compliance schedule approval report  

SciTech Connect

This document, the Standards/Requirements Identification Document (S/RID) Phase I Assessment Corrective Actions/Compliance Schedule Approval Report for the subject facility, contains the corrective actions required to bring the facility into compliance as a result of an Administrative Assessment to determine whether S/RID requirements are fully addressed by existing policies, plans or procedures. These actions are delineated in the Compliance Schedule Approvals which also contain; noncompliances, risks, compensatory measures, schedules for corrective actions, justifications for approval, and resource impacts.

Biebesheimer, E.

1996-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

27

The Costs and Benefits of Compliance with Renewable Portfolio Standards: Reviewing Experience to Date  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

M. (2007). Can deployment of renewable energy put downwardXcel Energy. (2011). Renewable Energy Standard Rate Impact2010. Alpena. (2012). Renewable Energy Annual Report for

Heeter, Jenny

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

28

Alabama Compliance Implementation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Alabama Alabama Compliance Implementation and Evaluation (CIE) Guide BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM COMPLIANCE IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION (CIE) GUIDE 2 This Guide is designed to assist state and local code jurisdictions in achieving statewide compliance with the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) for residential buildings and ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007 for commercial buildings. COMPLIANCE IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION (CIE) GUIDE 3 Alabama WHAT'S INSIDE CIE Guide Overview-Flow Diagram ........................................................................................................................... 5 PART 1: Guide Overview .................................................................................................................................................

29

Assessing compliance with the EPA high-level waste standard: an overview  

SciTech Connect

The US Environmental Protection Agency has set a standard for the performance of geologic repositories for the disposal of high-level radioactive waste. The standard is divided into several sections, including a section on containment requirements. The containment requirement is probabilistic, in that it allows certain small amounts of radioactive waste to be released at high probabilities and larger amounts to be released at lower probabilities. The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission is responsible for implementing the standard. Implementation of the standard will probably involve development and screening of scenarios, assignment of probabilities to the scenarios, determination of consequences of the scenarios, and analysis of uncertainties. Scenario development consists of first, identifying events and processes that could initiate waste releases or affect waste transport, and second, combining the events and processes in physically reasonable ways. Scenarios can be screened on the basis of low probabilities or consequences. Consequences of scenarios are estimated using a series of models that simulate the movement of radionuclides out of the waste package and underground facility and the transport of the radionuclides by ground water or other means to the accessible environment. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis examines the sources and effects of uncertainties on the calculations. This document uses a simple example to illustrate techniques for the implementation of the standard.

Hunter, R.L.; Cranwell, R.M.; Chu, M.S.Y.

1986-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

30

Review of the WIPP draft application to show compliance with EPA transuranic waste disposal standards  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of the New Mexico Environmental Evaluation Group (EEG) is to conduct an independent technical evaluation of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Project to ensure the protection of the public health and safety and the environment. The WIPP Project, located in southeastern New Mexico, is being constructed as a repository for the disposal of transuranic (TRU) radioactive wastes generated by the national defense programs. The EEG was established in 1978 with funds provided by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to the State of New Mexico. Public Law 100-456, the National Defense Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 1989, Section 1433, assigned EEG to the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology and continued the original contract DE-AC04-79AL10752 through DOE contract DE-AC04-89AL58309. The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994, Public Law 103-160, continues the authorization. EEG performs independent technical analyses of the suitability of the proposed site; the design of the repository, its planned operation, and its long-term integrity; suitability and safety of the transportation systems; suitability of the Waste Acceptance Criteria and the generator sites` compliance with them; and related subjects. These analyses include assessments of reports issued by the DOE and its contractors, other federal agencies and organizations, as they relate to the potential health, safety and environmental impacts from WIPP. Another important function of EEG is the independent environmental monitoring of background radioactivity in air, water, and soil, both on-site and off-site.

Neill, R.H.; Chaturvedi, L.; Clemo, T.M. [and others

1996-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

31

Q. For the 2005 Standards there is a new compliance credit for "ducts buried in attic insulation." What must be done to qualify for that credit?  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Q. For the 2005 Standards there is a new compliance credit for "ducts buried in attic insulation installation of insulation and duct sealing. When taking the buried duct credit, a minimum of R-30 insulation-4.2 duct insulation. Only the portions of duct runs that are directly on or within 3.5 inches

32

Standard Compliance: Guidelines to Help State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets Meet Their Energy Policy Act Requirements, 10 CFR Part 490 (Book)  

SciTech Connect

This guidebook addresses the primary requirements of the Alternative Fuel Transportation Program to help state and alternative fuel provider fleets comply with the Energy Policy Act via the Standard Compliance option. It also addresses the topics that covered fleets ask about most frequently.

Not Available

2012-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

33

Standard Compliance: Guidelines to Help State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets Meet Their Energy Policy Act Requirements, 10 CFR Part 490 (Book)  

SciTech Connect

This guidebook addresses the primary requirements of the Alternative Fuel Transportation Program to help state and alternative fuel provider fleets comply with the Energy Policy Act via the Standard Compliance option. It also addresses the topics that covered fleets ask about most frequently.

Not Available

2014-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

34

Labor Standards Compliance, Contractor Labor Relations, and Contractor Workforce Restructuring Programs  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

To ensure that contractors pursue collective bargaining practices that promote efficiency and economy in contract operations, judicious expenditure of public funds, equitable resolution of disputes, and effective collective bargaining relationships; that contractor relations/human resources specialists achieve consultations with management and operating contractors; and that appropriate labor standards are included in DOE/NNSA contracts and subcontracts. Cancels Chapters I-III of DOE O 350.1 Chg 4. Does not cancel other directives.

2014-09-29T23:59:59.000Z

35

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Environmental Compliance | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Compliance FAQS Job Task Analyses - Environmental Compliance FAQS Job Task Analyses are performed on the Function Area Qualification Standards. The FAQS Job Task...

36

The Advanced Candu reactor annunciation system - Compliance with IEC standard and US NRC guidelines  

SciTech Connect

Annunciation is a key plant information system that alerts Operations staff to important changes in plant processes and systems. Operational experience at nuclear stations worldwide has shown that many annunciation implementations do not provide the support needed by Operations staff in all plant situations. To address utility needs for annunciation improvement in Candu plants, AECL in partnership with Canadian Candu utilities, undertook an annunciation improvement program in the early nineties. The outcome of the research and engineering development program was the development and simulator validation of alarm processing, display, and information presentation techniques that provide practical and effective solutions to key operational deficiencies with earlier annunciation implementations. The improved annunciation capabilities consist of a series of detection, information processing and presentation functions called the Candu Annunciation Message List System (CAMLS). The CAMLS concepts embody alarm processing, presentation and interaction techniques, and strategies and methods for annunciation system configuration to ensure improved annunciation support for all plant situations, especially in upset situations where the alarm generation rate is high. The Advanced Candu Reactor (ACR) project will employ the CAMLS annunciation concepts as the basis for primary annunciation implementations. The primary annunciation systems will be implemented from CAMLS applications hosted on AECL Advanced Control Centre Information System (ACCIS) computing technology. The ACR project has also chosen to implement main control room annunciation aspects in conformance with the following international standard and regulatory review guide for control room annunciation practice: International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62241 - Main Control Room, Alarm Function and Presentation (International standard) US NRC NUREG-0700 - Human-System Interface Design Review Guidelines, Section 4 - Alarm System (Regulatory review guide) In order for the ACR annunciation system to comply with IEC-62241 and NUREG-0700, the CAMLS concepts must satisfy their respective requirements and guidelines. This paper will provide a summary of how CAMLS complies with IEC-62241 and NUREG-0700. Overall, the CAMLS-based annunciation requirements conform to the intent of the recommended annunciation practices included in both these documents. However, there are minor differences in requirements interpretation and annunciation practice between CAMLS implementation concepts and the recommended practice in each document. Generally the differences with IEC-62241 revolve around definitions, the display properties of new alarms, and video display unit (VDU) alarm display organization. The differences with NUREG-0700 revolve around segregation of status alarms, the use of spatially dedicated, continuously visible displays, simultaneous display of high-priority alarms, audible signals for alarm states and reminder signals, blank lines in alarm message lists and manual silencing. These minor differences are discussed and rationales for the CAMLS implementation concepts are provided. (authors)

Leger, R.; Malcolm, S. [Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, 2251 Speakman Drive, Mississauga, Ont. L5K 1B2 (Canada); Davey, E. [Crew Systems Solutions, Deep River, Ont. K0J 1P0 (Canada)

2006-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

37

The Costs and Benefits of Compliance with Renewable Portfolio Standards: Reviewing Experience to Date  

SciTech Connect

More than half of U.S. states have renewable portfolio standards (RPS) in place and have collectively deployed approximately 46,000 MW of new renewable energy capacity through year-end 2012. Most of these policies have five or more years of implementation experience, enabling an assessment of their costs and benefits. Understanding RPS benefits and costs is essential for policymakers evaluating existing RPS policies, assessing the need for modifications, and considering new policies. A key aspect of this study is the comprehensive review of existing RPS cost and benefit estimates, in addition to an examination of the variety of methods used to calculate such estimates. Based on available data and estimates reported by utilities and regulators, this study summarizes RPS costs to date. The study considers how those costs may evolve going forward, given scheduled increases in RPS targets and cost containment mechanisms incorporated into existing policies. The report also summarizes RPS benefits estimates, based on published studies for individual states, and discusses key methodological considerations.

Heeter, Jenny; Barbose, Galen; Bird, Lori; Weaver, Samantha; Flores, Francisco; Kuskova-Burns, Ksenia; Wiser, Ryan

2014-03-12T23:59:59.000Z

38

Building Code Compliance and Enforcement: The Experience of SanFrancisco's Residential Energy Conservation Ordinanace and California'sBuildign Standards for New Construction  

SciTech Connect

As part of Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory's (LBL) technical assistance to the Sustainable City Project, compliance and enforcement activities related to local and state building codes for existing and new construction were evaluated in two case studies. The analysis of the City of San Francisco's Residential Energy Conservation Ordinance (RECO) showed that a limited, prescriptive energy conservation ordinance for existing residential construction can be enforced relatively easily with little administrative costs, and that compliance with such ordinances can be quite high. Compliance with the code was facilitated by extensive publicity, an informed public concerned with the cost of energy and knowledgeable about energy efficiency, the threat of punishment (Order of Abatement), the use of private inspectors, and training workshops for City and private inspectors. The analysis of California's Title 24 Standards for new residential and commercial construction showed that enforcement of this type of code for many climate zones is more complex and requires extensive administrative support for education and training of inspectors, architects, engineers, and builders. Under this code, prescriptive and performance approaches for compliance are permitted, resulting in the demand for alternative methods of enforcement: technical assistance, plan review, field inspection, and computer analysis. In contrast to existing construction, building design and new materials and construction practices are of critical importance in new construction, creating a need for extensive technical assistance and extensive interaction between enforcement personnel and the building community. Compliance problems associated with building design and installation did occur in both residential and nonresidential buildings. Because statewide codes are enforced by local officials, these problems may increase over time as energy standards change and become more complex and as other standards (eg, health and safety codes) remain a higher priority. The California Energy Commission realizes that code enforcement by itself is insufficient and expects that additional educational and technical assistance efforts (eg, manuals, training programs, and toll-free telephone lines) will ameliorate these problems.

Vine, E.

1990-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

39

Tank waste information network system II (TWINS2) year 2000 compliance assurance plan  

SciTech Connect

The scope of this plan includes the Tank Waste Information Network System II (TWINS2) that contains the following major components: Tank Characterization Database (TCD), Tank Vapor Database (TVD), Data Source Access (DSA), automated Tank Characterization Report, Best-Basis Inventory Model (BBIM), and Tracker (corrective action tracking) function. The automated Tank Characterization Report application currently in development also will reside on-the TWINS system as will the BBIM. Critical inputs to TWINS occur from the following databases: Labcore and SACS. Output does not occur from TWINS to these two databases.

Adams, M.R.

1998-04-16T23:59:59.000Z

40

Environmental Compliance Guide  

SciTech Connect

The Guide is intended to assist Department of Energy personnel by providing information on the NEPA process, the processes of other environmental statutes that bear on the NEPA process, the timing relationships between the NEPA process and these other processes, as well as timing relationships between the NEPA process and the development process for policies, programs, and projects. This information should be helpful not only in formulating environmental compliance plans but also in achieving compliance with NEPA and various other environmental statutes. The Guide is divided into three parts with related appendices: Part I provides guidance for developing environmental compliance plans for DOE actions; Part II is devoted to NEPA with detailed flowcharts depicting the compliance procedures required by CEQ regulations and Department of Energy NEPA Guidelines; and Part III contains a series of flowcharts for other Federal environmental requirements that may apply to DOE projects.

None

1981-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "ii compliance standards" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Thermodynamik II Aufgabe 2.3 Standard-Bildungsenthalpie und Standard-Reaktionsenthalpie, Hessscher Satz  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Reaktion exotherm oder endotherm? B) Die Standard-Bildungsenthalpie pro Mol Formelumsatz von Methan als Gas-Reaktionsenthalpie der Reaktion von fl¨ussiger Stickstoff- wasserstoffs¨aure HN3(l) mit gasf¨ormigem Stickstoffmonoxid NO CH4(g) kann durch die Reaktion von festem Kohlenstoff (Graphit) C(s) mit Wasserstoff H2(g) C(s) + 2 H

Peters, Norbert

42

Export Compliance Certificate Program  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

bearing the UC seal signifies a well- known, uncompromising standard of academic excellence. #12;Export-depth knowledge or thorough review of export compliance regulations Individuals at the front line of defense plan approach Identify risks early within a transaction in order to avoid costly delays or potential

Barrett, Jeffrey A.

43

National standards and code compliance for electrical equipment and instruments installed in hazardous locations for the cone penetrometer  

SciTech Connect

The cone penetrometer is designed to measure the material properties of waste tank contents at the Hanford Site. The penetrometer system consists of a skid-mounted assembly, a penetrometer assembly (composed of a guide tube and a push rod), an active neutron moisture measurement probe, decontamination unit, and a support trailer containing a diesel-engine-driven hydraulic pump and a generator. The skid-mounted assembly is about 8 feet wide by 23 feet long and 15 feet high. Its nominal weight is about 40,000 pounds with the provisions to add up to 54,500 pounds of additional ballast. This document describes the cone penetrometer electrical instruments and how it complies with national standards.

Bussell, J.H.

1996-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

44

BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM Iowa Compliance Implementation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Iowa Iowa Compliance Implementation and Evaluation (CIE) Guide COMPLIANCE IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION (CIE) GUIDE 2 This Guide is designed to assist state and local code jurisdictions in achieving statewide compliance with the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) for residential buildings and ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007 for commercial buildings. COMPLIANCE IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION (CIE) GUIDE 3 Iowa WHAT'S INSIDE CIE Guide Overview-Flow Diagram ........................................................................................................................... 5 PART 1: Guide Overview .................................................................................................................................................

45

Compliance, Certification and Enforcement for US Appliance and Equipment Energy Efficiency Programs by US DOE  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

Information about energy and water conservation standards, ENERGY STAR, and compliance and certification enforcement.

46

Compliance Certification Enforcement | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Compliance Certification Enforcement Compliance Certification Enforcement Compliance Certification Enforcement DOE enforces the energy and water conservation regulations established by the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Appliance Standards Program to ensure that residential, commercial and industrial equipment deliver the energy and cost savings required by law. To ensure that all covered products comply with the energy and water conservation standards, the enforcement office reviews manufacturers' compliance with certification requirements. Products covered under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, as amended, are required annually to ''certify by means of a certification report that each basic model(s) meets the applicable energy conservation standard." This program

47

Standard-II and extended tests of the Swiss LCT-coil  

SciTech Connect

The Swiss contribution to the international Large Coil Task was a D-shaped 2.5 x 3.5 m . m bore, superconducting toroidal field coil of 8 T. The conductor was made from copper stabilized fully transposed NbTi filaments, cabled in three stages and cooled with pressurized supercritical helium. The testing of the six coils was successfully finished last year at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Results of the single-coil and the full-array Standard-I tests were reported earlier. This paper presents the data of the ac loss measurements taken during the Standard-II tests. The results are compared with predictions made while designing the coil. Next the results of the Extended Condition tests are discussed. Finally the recently analyzed quench data, taken during the whole test period, are presented.

Zichy, J.A.; Jakob, B.; Kwasnitza, K.; Sborchia, C.; Vecsey, G.; Lubell, M.S.; Shen, S.S.

1989-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

48

COMPLIANCE FORMS SUMMARY APPENDIX A  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of these phases are described below. Building Permit Phase Documentation The Standards Section 10-103(a) requires specifications needed for new construction compliance, including HVAC capacity and the results of the heating and cooling load calculations need to be to be attached. The Standards require that a certificate

49

Residential Building Code Compliance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 6 Residential Building Code Compliance: Recent Findings and Implications Energy use in residential buildings in the U.S. is significant-about 20% of primary energy use. While several approaches reduce energy use such as appliance standards and utility programs, enforcing state building energy codes is one of the most promising. However, one of the challenges is to understand the rate of compliance within the building community. Utility companies typically use these codes as the baseline for providing incentives to builders participating in utility-sponsored residential new construction (RNC) programs. However, because builders may construct homes that fail to meet energy codes, energy use in the actual baseline is higher than would be expected if all buildings complied with the code. Also,

50

2014-09-18 Issuance: Energy Conservation Standard for Alternative Efficiency Determination Methods, Basic Model Definition, and Compliance for Commercial HVAC, Refrigeration, and Water Heating Equipment; Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document is a pre-publication Federal Register supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking regarding energy conservation standards for alternative efficiency determination methods, basic model definition, and compliance for commercial HVAC, Refrigeration, and Water Heating Equipment, as issued by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency on September 18, 2014. Though it is not intended or expected, should any discrepancy occur between the document posted here and the document published in the Federal Register, the Federal Register publication controls. This document is being made available through the Internet solely as a means to facilitate the public's access to this document.

51

II. GENERAL COMPLIANCE SUPPLEMENT INTRODUCTION  

Energy Savers (EERE)

menu - Scroll down to the center of the page; find the Recipient Reported Data Search section - Click on "Go" (do not enter the name of the Agency, StateTerritory or the...

52

Environmental Compliance 2-1 2. Environmental Compliance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office to conduct its operations in compliance with federal, state, and best management practices. DOE and its contractors make every effort to conduct operations agreements, executive orders, DOE orders (as incorporated into the operating contracts), work smart standards

Pennycook, Steve

53

Environmental Compliance 2-1 2. Environmental Compliance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Oak Ridge Operations Office to conduct its operations in compliance with federal, settlement agreements, executive orders, DOE orders (as incorporated into the operating contracts), necessary and sufficient standards, and best management practices. DOE and its contractors make every effort to conduct

Pennycook, Steve

54

Environmental Compliance 2-1 2. Environmental Compliance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Security Administration (DOE-NNSA) policy to conduct its operations in compliance with federal, state, and best management practices. DOE and its contractors make every effort to conduct operations agreements, executive orders, DOE orders (as incorporated into the operating contracts), work smart standards

Pennycook, Steve

55

Environmental Compliance 2-1 2. Environmental Compliance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Nuclear Security Administration (DOE-NNSA) policy to conduct its operations in compliance with federal, settlement agreements, executive orders, DOE orders (as incorporated into the operating contracts), work smart standards, and best management practices. DOE and its contractors make every effort to conduct

Pennycook, Steve

56

Utah Compliance Implementation and Evaluation Guide  

SciTech Connect

This Guide is designed to assist state and local code jurisdictions in achieving statewide compliance with the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) for residential buildings and ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007 for commercial buildings.

Cole, Pamala C.

2012-08-30T23:59:59.000Z

57

Nevada Compliance Implementation and Evaluation Guide  

SciTech Connect

This Guide is designed to assist state and local code jurisdictions in achieving statewide compliance with the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) for residential buildings and ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007 for commercial buildings.

Cole, Pamala C.

2012-08-30T23:59:59.000Z

58

Iowa Compliance Implementation and Evaluation Guide  

SciTech Connect

This Guide is designed to assist state and local code jurisdictions in achieving statewide compliance with the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) for residential buildings and ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007 for commercial buildings.

Cole, Pamala C.

2012-09-04T23:59:59.000Z

59

FAQS Qualification Card - Environment Compliance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environment Compliance Environment Compliance FAQS Qualification Card - Environment Compliance A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-EnvironmentalCompliance.docx Description Environment Compliance Qualification Card More Documents & Publications FAQS Qualification Card - Safeguards and Security General Technical Base

60

State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleet Compliance Methods (Revised) (Brochure)  

SciTech Connect

This fact sheet describes the difference between Standard and Alternative Compliance requirements for state and alternative fuel provider fleets covered by the Energy Policy Act.

Not Available

2014-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "ii compliance standards" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

DOE Steps Lead to Significant Increase in Compliance with Energy...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Department of Energy Subpoenas Compliance Data from AeroSys, Inc. DOE Requires Manufacturers to Halt Sales of Heat Pumps and Air Conditioners Violating Minimum Appliance Standards...

62

State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleet Compliance Methods (Revised) (Brochure)  

SciTech Connect

Fact sheet describes the difference between Standard and Alternative Compliance requirements for state and alternative fuel provider fleets covered under the Energy Policy Acts of 1992 and 2005.

Not Available

2009-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

63

Standard  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Standard Standard rock For at least two generations, the depth of underground muon experiments has been reduced to depth in "standard rock." This is by definition the overburden of the Cayuga Rock Salt Mine near Ithaca, New York, where K. Greisen and collaborators made seminal observations of muons at substantial depths[1]. Ref. 1 says only "Most of the ground consists of shales of various types, with average density 2.65 g/cm 2 and average atomic number 11." Menon and Murthy later extended the definition: Z 2 /A = 5.5, Z/A = 0.5, and and ρ = 2.65 g/cm 2 [2]. It was thus not-quite-sodium. Lohmann[3] further assumed the mean excitation energy and density effect parameters were those of calcium carbonate, with no adjustments for the slight density difference. We use their definition for this most important material. (Extracted from D.E. Groom, N.V. Mokhov, and S.I. Striganov,

64

Alternative Compliance: Guidelines for Preparing and Submitting a Waiver Request Application and Other Documentation Requirements  

SciTech Connect

This document is designed to assist covered fleets interested in taking advantage of more flexible compliance options and to facilitate the transition from Standard Compliance to Alternative Compliance. It is designed to help fleets better understand the Alternative Compliance option and successfully complete the waiver application process.

Not Available

2013-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

65

Alternative Compliance: Guidelines for Preparing and Submitting a Waiver Request Application and Other Documentation Requirements (Book)  

SciTech Connect

This document is designed to assist covered fleets interested in taking advantage of more flexible compliance options and to facilitate the transition from Standard Compliance to Alternative Compliance. It is designed to help fleets better understand the Alternative Compliance option and successfully complete the waiver application process.

Sears, T.

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

66

Alternative Compliance: Guidelines for Preparing and Submitting a Waiver Request Application and Other Documentation Requirements (Book)  

SciTech Connect

This document is designed to assist covered fleets interested in taking advantage of more flexible compliance options and to facilitate the transition from Standard Compliance to Alternative Compliance. It is designed to help fleets better understand the Alternative Compliance option and successfully complete the waiver application process.

Not Available

2010-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

67

Alternative Compliance: Guidelines for Preparing and Submitting a Waiver Request Application and Other Documentation Requirements (Brochure)  

SciTech Connect

This document is designed to assist covered fleets interested in taking advantage of more flexible compliance options and to facilitate the transition from Standard Compliance to Alternative Compliance. It is designed to help fleets better understand the Alternative Compliance option and successfully complete the waiver application process.

Not Available

2014-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

68

Compliance Order on Consent  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Laws » Laws » Compliance Order on Consent Compliance Order on Consent The Compliance Order on Consent provides the requirements for environmental cleanup of hazardous constituents for LANL. Contact Environmental Communication & Public Involvement P.O. Box 1663 MS M996 Los Alamos, NM 87545 (505) 667-0216 Email What is the Compliance Order on Consent? The Compliance Order on Consent between the State of New Mexico Environment Department and the United States Department of Energy and Los Alamos National Laboratory provides for specified compliance requirements for all of the solid waste management units, areas of concern, canyons, and watershed aggregates included in the Order. Compliance Order on Consent documents LANL documents submitted under the Compliance Order on Consent are

69

Type II-P supernovae as standardized candles: improvements using near-infrared data .  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

??We present the first near-infrared Hubble diagram for Type II-P supernovae (SNe), to further explore their value as distance indicators.We use a modified version of (more)

Maguire, K.

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

70

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ...........................................................................................................................................II  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

i i ii TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ...........................................................................................................................................II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................................... 4 COMPLIANCE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... 6 COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION, AND LIABILITY ACT (CERCLA) .................... 6

71

Oil Mist Compliance  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes activities at the KCP related to evaluating and modifying machine tools in order to be in compliance with Section 23 of DOE 10 CFR 851, Worker Safety and Health Program. Section 851.23 (a) states that Contractors must comply with the following safety and health standards that are applicable to the hazards in their covered workplace, and subsection 9 contains the following applicable standard: American Congress of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices, (2005) (incorporated by reference, see 851.27) when the ACGIH Threshold Limit Values are lower (more protective) than permissible exposure limits in 29 CFR 1910. In the 2005 ACGIH Threshold Limit Value book a Notice of Change was issued for exposure to mineral oil mist used in metalworking fluids (MWFs). The effects of planning for the new facility and which machine tools would be making the transition to the new facility affected which machine tools were modified.

Lazarus, Lloyd

2009-02-02T23:59:59.000Z

72

Research Ethics & Compliance Support  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Research Ethics & Compliance Support Dr Ted Rohr, Director RECS #12;http://research.unsw.edu.au/research-ethics-and-compliance-support-recs #12;Research is considered by: Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECs) A and B: � All human research involving more than low risk Human Research Ethics Advisory Panels (HREAPs) A to I: � All human research

Blennerhassett, Peter

73

Compliance Verification Paths for Residential and Commercial Energy Codes  

SciTech Connect

This report looks at different ways to verify energy code compliance and to ensure that the energy efficiency goals of an adopted document are achieved. Conformity assessment is the body of work that ensures compliance, including activities that can ensure residential and commercial buildings satisfy energy codes and standards. This report identifies and discusses conformity-assessment activities and provides guidance for conducting assessments.

Conover, David R.; Makela, Eric J.; Fannin, Jerica D.; Sullivan, Robin S.

2011-10-10T23:59:59.000Z

74

Compliance Documents | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Reactor during decommissioning. Compliance and other legal documents illustrate and help support the development of effective compliance approaches and strategies, and can...

75

Bs?l+l- in a type-II two-Higgs-doublet model and the minimal supersymmetric standard model  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

In this paper we analyze the process Bs?l+l- in a type-II two-Higgs-doublet model (2HDM) and the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM). All the leading terms of Wilson coefficients relevant to the process are given in the large tan ? limit. It is shown that the decay width for Bs?l+l- depends on all parameters except mA0 in the 2HDM. The branching ratio of Bs??+?- can reach its experimental bound in some large tan ? regions of the parameter space in the MSSM because the amplitude increases as tan3? in the regions. For l=?, the branching ratio can even reach 10-4 in the regions. Therefore, the experimental measurements of leptonic decays of Bs could put a constraint on the contributions of neutral Higgs bosons and consequently the parameter space in the MSSM.

Chao-Shang Huang, Liao Wei, Qi-Shu Yan, and Shou-Hua Zhu

2001-05-07T23:59:59.000Z

76

Inclusive Search for Standard Model Higgs Boson Production in the WW Decay Channel using the CDF II Detector  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We present a search for standard model (SM) Higgs boson production using ppbar collision data at sqrt(s) = 1.96 TeV, collected with the CDF II detector and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 4.8 fb-1. We search for Higgs bosons produced in all processes with a significant production rate and decaying to two W bosons. We find no evidence for SM Higgs boson production and place upper limits at the 95% confidence level on the SM production cross section (sigma(H)) for values of the Higgs boson mass (m_H) in the range from 110 to 200 GeV. These limits are the most stringent for m_H > 130 GeV and are 1.29 above the predicted value of sigma(H) for mH = 165 GeV.

The CDF Collaboration; T. Aaltonen

2010-02-17T23:59:59.000Z

77

NEPA Compliance Officer  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Compliance Officer Compliance Officer Award #: EE 000 0784 Recipient: County of Escambia ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) MC Blanchard Judicial Center B5.1 Historic Preservation Clause and Old Courthouse Block Waste Stream Clause Office Complex EEIP Road Prison Geothermal Earth Coupled HVAC Upgrade A9, All Allowable Activities: Information gathering, data collection, reporting, and preliminary design. Prohibited Activities: Implementation of final design, construction, and operation tasks for this project should be conditioned pending further NEPA review. Landfill Gas Extraction and Control System A9, All Allowable Activities: Information gathering,

78

DOE Audit Guidance for For-Profit Financial Assistance Awards (Part II)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

II) II) General Compliance Supplement April 2012 1 II. GENERAL COMPLIANCE SUPPLEMENT INTRODUCTION The objectives of most compliance requirements for DOE programs are generic in nature. For example, most programs have eligibility requirements. While the criteria for determining eligibility vary by program, the objective of the compliance requirement that only eligible entities participate is consistent across all programs. Rather than repeat these compliance requirements, audit objectives, and suggested audit procedures for each program, they are provided once in this part. For each program in this Compliance Supplement (this Supplement), the program-specific compliance guidance section (Part III of this guidance) contains additional information about the compliance requirements that arise from laws

79

II  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Page 1 of2 Page 1 of2 (HIOlo U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERMINATION RECIPIENT:State of Oklahoma PROJECT TITLE: OKLAHOMA SEP ARRA - Native American Cultural & Educational Authority STATE: OK Funding Opportunity Announcemcnt Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-FOA-0000052 EEOOOQ133 GF0-09-332-OO7 0 Based on my review oftbc information concerning the proposed adion, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 45I.1A).1 have made tbe following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 85.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical

80

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

f8J 0 Hazardous A. ir Pollutants? Is the project subject to emissions limitations in an Air Quality 0 f8J 0 Control Region? 2 Revised on: 1111212008 NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY Impacts...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "ii compliance standards" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Ethics and Compliance Manager  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This position is located in the Office of the Deputy Administrator, Compliance and Governance Section. Additional vacancies may be filled through this vacancy announcement or if they become available.

82

340 Facility compliance assessment  

SciTech Connect

This study provides an environmental compliance evaluation of the RLWS and the RPS systems of the 340 Facility. The emphasis of the evaluation centers on compliance with WAC requirements for hazardous and mixed waste facilities, federal regulations, and Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC) requirements pertinent to the operation of the 340 Facility. The 340 Facility is not covered under either an interim status Part A permit or a RCRA Part B permit. The detailed discussion of compliance deficiencies are summarized in Section 2.0. This includes items of significance that require action to ensure facility compliance with WAC, federal regulations, and WHC requirements. Outstanding issues exist for radioactive airborne effluent sampling and monitoring, radioactive liquid effluent sampling and monitoring, non-radioactive liquid effluent sampling and monitoring, less than 90 day waste storage tanks, and requirements for a permitted facility.

English, S.L. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States)

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

83

Compliance Agreements | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Compliance » Compliance Compliance » Compliance Agreements Compliance Agreements This photo shows the Savannah River Site’s Heavy Water Components Test Reactor during decommissioning. This photo shows the Savannah River Site's Heavy Water Components Test Reactor during decommissioning. Compliance agreements illustrate and help support the development of effective compliance approaches and strategies, and can assist in promoting greater cooperation, coordination, and consistency with other EM offices, Departmental organizations, and State agencies. Please click the site or location name to view a listing of the associated agreements and summaries. Idaho Oak Ridge Paducah Portsmouth Richland/Office of River Protection Savannah River Closure Sites NNSA Sites West Valley Demonstration Project

84

E-Print Network 3.0 - agarose mold compliance Sample Search Results  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

to all, regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, o Summary: is in compliance with any standards for mold...

85

Oak Ridge Reservation Compliance Order, September 26, 1995  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reservation Compliance Order, September 26, 1995 Page 1 of 5 Reservation Compliance Order, September 26, 1995 Page 1 of 5 EM Home | Regulatory Compliance | Environmental Compliance Agreements Oak Ridge Reservation Compliance Order, September 26, 1995 STATE OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION IN THE MATTER OF: ) ) ) DIVISION OF SOLID WASTE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ) MANAGEMENT ENERGY ) ) CASE NO. 95-0514 RESPONDENT ) Commissioner's Order NOW COMES Don Dills, Commissioner of the Department of Environment and Conservation, and states that: Table of Contents Parties Jurisdiction Facts Order Reservation of Rights Notice of Rights Parties I. Don Dills is the duly appointed Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation ("the Department"). II. The United States Department of Energy ("DOE")is a department, agency and instrumentality of the

86

II  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

II II c )3 c F r c L LI L rr c - r I P- c OAK RlDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY h U W -l\ &?ir;; ITi' m . 8 ORNL/RASA-92/l Results of the Radiological Survey at the Former Chapman Valve Manufacturing Company, Indian Orchard, Massachusetts (cIooo1) R. D. Foley M . S. Uziel MANAGED BY MARTIN MARIETTA ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. FOR THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ORNLJRASA-92/l /- HEALTH AND SAFETY RESEARCH DIVISION Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Non-Defense Programs (Activity No. EX 20 20 01 0; ADS317OOOO) Results of the Radiological Survey at the Former Chapman Valve Manufacturing Company, Indian Orchard, Massachusetts (cIooo1) R. D. Foley and M. S. Uziel Date Issued - July 1992 Investigation learn R. E. Swaja - Measurement Applications and Development Manager

87

DOE NEPA Compliance Officers  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA Compliance Officers NEPA Compliance Officers NEPA Compliance Officers are listed first for Program Offices, then Power Marketing Administrations, then Field Offices. Please send updates to yardena.mansoor@hq.doe.gov Oct 04, 2013 Forrestal (FORS) Addresses: Germantown (GTN) Addresses: 1000 Independence Ave SW 1000 Independence Ave SW Washington, DC 20585 Washington, DC 20585-1290 . Use for U.S. Postal Service mail. 19901 Germantown Road Germantown, MD 20874-1290 Use for EXPRESS DELIVERY (e.g. Federal Express, UPS). NAME, OFFICE, E-MAIL FAX ADDRESS PHONE william.bierbower@hq.doe.gov Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy 202-287-6585 FORS AR-1 20585 ARPA-E William Bierbower lori.gray@go.doe.gov Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office 720-356-1568 720-356-1350 Department of Energy

88

Coach Compliance Form  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Coach Compliance Form Coach Compliance Form My team is participating in the Department of Energy's Lithium-Ion Battery Car Competition as part of the National Science Bowl ® . I have reviewed the following documents with the participating students: o Safety Hazards of Batteries o Material Safety Data Sheet - Lithium Polymer Battery o Electric Battery Car Competition Rules ______________________________ ______________ Coach Signature Date Name of School: ____________________________________________ Name of Coach (Please Print): ________________________________ Coach's Email Address: ______________________________________ Please sign this form and either mail, fax or e-mail a pdf to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory: National Renewable Energy Laboratory

89

Environmental Compliance 2-1 2. Environmental Compliance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and DOE National Nuclear Security Administration policy to conduct its operations in compliance, and best management practices. DOE and its contractors make every effort to conduct operationsEnvironmental Compliance 2-1 2. Environmental Compliance It is DOE Oak Ridge Operations Office

Pennycook, Steve

90

Environmental Compliance 2-1 2. Environmental Compliance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Security Administration (NNSA) policy to conduct operations in compliance with federal, state, and local. DOE and its contractors make every effort to conduct operations in compliance with the letter three ORR facilities operated in compliance with the regulatory dose limits of Tennessee Rule 1200

Pennycook, Steve

91

II  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

: " + ; . .Z + II . ? 8 . " ~. . . . a a' .; ,. ?> , . ' . : . ., ! , Environmental i r .,' : % , ~ ~ 9 . / ; i.3. -\ ,- I - 'I ' , 2 " .r: 1; . . , ~ . ,&- c . . a , ,, .,I;< . .' , , ? $ ; 1- !'I' . '...~ - .. :, , .I Closure Report for CAU No. 416 1: ' . Project Shoal Area I:' c!';,: .. 7. .. , . ~ 1 I' ,. Controlled Copy No. UNCONTROLLED { -* .. 4'. . 1 " . .. *. *" '.. . . , , ,I +' , ,.f.' I , I" I ', ', ctk;' . , I , '. :C, , I: : , . p . ? .,; . s . " . , k - ,

92

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Environmental Compliance FAQS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Compliance Functional Area Qualification Standard Environmental Compliance Functional Area Qualification Standard DOE-STD-1156-2011 Step 1 Identify and evaluate tasks - Develop a comprehensive list of tasks that define the job. o A great starting point is the list of Duties and Responsibilities from the FAQS. o Give careful thought to additional tasks that could be considered. o Don't worry about deleting tasks at this point - that is a part of the process further down. - List the tasks (and their sources, e.g., Duties and Responsibilities #1) in the chart below. - Discuss each task as a group and come to a consensus pertaining to Importance and Frequency of the task (i.e., each team member can consent to the assigned value, even if they don't exactly agree with it). - When all values have been assigned, consider as a group deleting tasks

93

Building Energy Codes COMPLIANCE TOOLKIT BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

COMPLIANCE TOOLKIT COMPLIANCE TOOLKIT BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM Building Energy Codes ACE LEARNING SERIES III Building Energy Codes COMPLIANCE TOOLKIT Prepared by: Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) is an information resource on energy codes and standards for buildings. They work with other government agencies, state and local jurisdictions, organizations that develop model codes and standards, and building industry to promote codes that will provide for energy and environmental benefits and help foster adoption of, compliance with, and enforcement of those codes. September 2012 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 PNNL-SA-90466 LEARNING SERIES OVERVIEW Building Energy Codes

94

Federal Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August 8, 1996  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August.. Page 1 of 18 Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August.. Page 1 of 18 EM Home | Regulatory Compliance | Environmental Compliance Agreements Federal Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August 8, 1996 NOTE: As of December 16, 1996, for the Oak Ridge Reservation this National Agreement was superseded by the Oak Ridge Reservation Polychlorinated Biphenyl Federal Facilities Compliance Agreement (ORR-PCB-FFCA). The ORR-PCB-FFCA will be available soon. Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Definitions III. Covered Materials IV. Statement of Facts & Conclusions of Law V. Compliance Requirements VI. Submittal and Review of Annual Status Report VII. Notification VIII. Dispute Resolution IX. Extensions

95

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Project lnfonnation Project Title: New Drilling Location in Section 29 Date: 12-10-2009 DOE Code: 6730.020.78002 Contractor Code: 8067-371 Project Lead: Mark Duletsky Project Overview The project will involve excavating 3-4 backhoe pits to a depth of about 8 feet to observe soil characteristics 1. What are the environmental impacts? in the vicinity of our planned reserve pit excavation area. 2. What is the legal location? NE 1/4, SE 1/4, Sec. 29. T39N. R78W. Natrona County, Wyoming 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used 1 day if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? Backhoe The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

96

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE (EC)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE (EC) OBJECTIVE EC.1: LANL has established and implemented an Environmental Compliance program to ensure safe accomplishment of work and operations within the requirements of the BIO, TSRs, SER, and regulatory permits for WCRR Facility activities. Sufficient numbers of qualified personnel, as well as adequate facilities and equipment, are available to support WCRRF operations. (CRs 1, 4, 6, 7, 9) CRITERIA 1. WCRRF has implemented the requirements for hazardous materials and waste management programs, as described in the WCRRF BIO and TSRs (WCRRF TSRs 5.6.9 and 5.10.2). 2. Environmental permits required for WCRR operations have been met. Processes are in place to ensure that these requirements are maintained. Environmental regulations include Resource

97

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Project l nfonnation Project Title: Reclamation ofT-2-14 Date: 11/2412009 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview We will be removing old piping from the treater@ T-2-14. We will also remove the berm and grade and 1. What are the environmental impacts? reclamate location. The duration of this project will be approx. 2 days. Equipment that will be used is as follows backhoe. dumptruck, blade,and a tiller so we can seed with native grasses. 2. What is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used if any (woO< over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? The table below Is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

98

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Replace electrical line from well to power pole Date: 3/10/2010 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Mike Preston Project Overview No impact to the environment. 1. What are the environmental impacts? Dig up old electrical line from pumping unit on 61-S-34 to power pole east of well , {approximately 75 feet 2. What is the legal location? from unit) and replace with new line. 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used 1 day if any (work over rig , drilling rig , etc.)? Electrician, ditch witch and operator for equipment The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

99

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Project lnfonnation Project Title: C-EAG. Maintenance I grading of existing roads Date: 8/4/2011 and road drainages (barrow ditches): ex 81.3 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Overview 1. Brief project description [include C-EA 6. Maintenance I grading of existing roads and road drai nages anything that could impact the (barrow ditches) : ex 81.3 environment] Existing roads defined as per May 2010 Aerial Photos. (Changing out culverts, grading I modifying embankments, etc., that has potential to impact wetlands, requires a NCS.) The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

100

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Restoration of 77 -13-SX-3 Date: 2-8-1 0 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview We will be restoring 77-SX-3 per procedure. 1. What are the environmental impacts? The duration of this project will be 3-4 days. 2. What is the leg al location? 3. What is the duration of the project? The equipment to be used will be Backhoe, welder, tiller dump truck. 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig , drilling rig , We will take oil contaminated dirt to the Eastside landfarm and backfill with d ean fill dirt from sec. 20. etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "ii compliance standards" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Project lnfonnation Project Title: e-EA5. Reclamation of well sites Date: 8/4/2011 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Overview e-EA 5. Reclamation of wellsites : ex 81.3 and ex 86.1 1. Brief project description [include anything that could impact the Small-scale, short-term cleanup actions including excavation and environment] consolidation of contaminated soils, removal of underground piping, removal of rig anchors or T-bars, drainage control , transport and backfilling of clean soil I fill dirt, and reseeding . The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

102

Environmental surveillance and compliance at Los Alamos during 1996  

SciTech Connect

This report presents environmental data that characterize environmental performance and addresses compliance with environmental standards and requirements at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL or the Laboratory) during 1996. The Laboratory routinely monitors for radiation and for radioactive nonradioactive materials at Laboratory sites as well as in the surrounding region. LANL uses the monitoring results to determine compliance with appropriate standards and to identify potentially undesirable trends. Data were collected in 1996 to assess external penetrating radiation; quantities of airborne emissions; and concentrations of chemicals and radionuclides in ambient air, surface waters and groundwaters, the municipal water supply, soils and sediments, and foodstuffs. Using comparisons with standards and regulations, this report concludes that environmental effects from Laboratory operations are small and do not pose a demonstrable threat to the public, Laboratory employees, or the environment. Laboratory operations were in compliance with all major environmental regulations.

NONE

1997-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

103

Evaluating Commercial Buildings for Statewide Compliance | Building Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Commercial Buildings for Statewide Compliance Commercial Buildings for Statewide Compliance The materials for this course may be used for in-person training courses, and are intended to provide the tools and specific training necessary to evaluate statewide commercial compliance with ASHRAE Standard 90.1. The course also provides useful training for the commercial provisions of the International Energy Conservation Code and general commercial field inspection for energy code compliance. The recommended background for taking this class is significant experience with plan review and/or inspection of commercial energy code provisions. Presenters: Course materials originally published by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program, July 16, 2010. Course Type: Training Materials Video In-person Downloads: Presentation Slides

104

Christina Bigelow Compliance Counsel  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Christina Bigelow Christina Bigelow Compliance Counsel Direct Dial: 317-249-5132 E-mail: cbigelow@misoenergy.org November 6, 2013 Mr. Stan Kaplan Mr. William Booth U.S. Energy Information Administration 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 VIA EMAIL RE: Form EIA-930 Hourly and Daily Balancing Authority Operations Report Revisions Dear Mssrs. Booth and Kaplan: On behalf of the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc 1 . ("MISO"), I want to extend our appreciation for your time and consideration of the input of the Independent System Operators and Regional Transmission Organizations ("ISOs/RTOs") regarding the proposal to collect additional Balancing Authority ("BA") operations information from all "Balancing

105

Compliance Certification Application  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

40 CFR Part 191 40 CFR Part 191 Compliance Certification Application for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Appendix PIC United States Department of Energy Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Carlsbad Area Office Carlsbad, New Mexico Passive Institutional Controls Conceptual Design Report PASSIVE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT REVISION 0 MAY 14, 1996 1 C PASSIVE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS DESIGN REPORT REVISION 0 PASSIVE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT MAY 1 4 . 1 9 9 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 A . Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 B . Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 C . Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 I1 . SITE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 I11 . DESIGN REQUIREMENTS/CRITERIA . . . . . . . . . . 17 IV . MESSAGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

106

Environmental Compliance 2-1 2. Environmental Compliance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

to conduct its operations in compliance with federal, state, and local environmental protection laws contractors make every effort to conduct operations in compliance with the letter and intent of applicableMahon, and L. G. Shipe Abstract It is the policy of the U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office

Pennycook, Steve

107

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Project Information Project Title: Survey Centralizer Design Date: 2-10-2010 DOE Code: 6730.020.71091 Contractor Code: 8067-762 Project Lead: Frank Ingham Project Overview 1. What are the environmental No environmental impacts. impacts? Run a logging tool through existing wells at : 2. What is the /ega/location? 67-LBT-3, SW SE sec 3, T38N , R78W 86-1 -X-10 , NE SE Sec 10, T38N , R78W 3. What is the duration of the project? 22-2-X-10H , NW NW Sec 10, T38N , R78W 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig , drilling rig, 4 Days etc.)? Stinger truck or crane . The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

108

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY # 350 8 Revised 8/2/10 mjt Attachment 1 Written by Dan Smallwood Production Enhancement Project-5 T-2-34 to T-1-33 MIT all wells in this area to determine which are producing wells. There are 15 wells shut in this area because of no tank or shipping line. According to the old test sheet these wells make 24bbls oil and 120bbls of water. Two of these wells have leaks in the flow lines that will be fixed. One is 33-S-34 which could be run to 34-AX-34, about 400' .6 bbl/pd and the other is 35 shx 34 which could be run to 35-AX-34 which is about 200'.5bbl/pd. 42-AX-34 could be ran to 32-AX-34 and then to 33-SX-34 to 34-AX-34. There are two manifolds at T-2-34, one with 10 wells and the other with 12. None of the flow lines have valves or checks in the lines. I propose we flush, disconnect, and plug all wells that

109

Compliance, Certification and Enforcement for US Appliance and Equipment Energy Efficiency Programs by US DOE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Compliance, Certification and Enforcement Compliance, Certification and Enforcement for US Appliance and Equipment Energy Efficiency Programs by US DOE As the Department of Energy is ramping up its focus on energy-efficiency, the Office of the General Counsel is stepping up enforcement and verification efforts to ensure manufacturers meet the energy and water conservation standards expected of them and save energy for American consumers and businesses. Recent enforcement initiatives go beyond compliance with energy-efficiency standards. We are working to protect consumers through verification and supporting the enforcement of Energy Star specifications to ensure that manufacturers offer the energy savings they advertise. Enforcement initiatives include: * Conservation Standards Enforcement

110

ACE Learning Series - Adoption, Compliance, and Enforcement | Building  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Resource Center Resource Center Site Map Printable Version Development Adoption Compliance Regulations Resource Center FAQs Publications Resource Guides eLearning Model Policies Glossary Related Links ACE Learning Series Utility Savings Estimators ACE Learning Series - Adoption, Compliance, and Enforcement ACE Learning Series Buildings account for almost 40% of the energy used in the United States and, as a direct result of that use, our environment and economy are impacted. Building energy codes and standards provide an effective response. The Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) designed the ACE Learning Series for those in the building industry having the greatest potential to influence the adoption of and compliance with building energy codes and standards. The Learning Series consists of:

111

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Change out down guy on power pole Date: 2-8-10 DOE Code : Contractor Code: Project Lead: Mike Preston Project Overview 1 What are the environmental No impact to the environment impacts? Power pole east of B-1 -33 2. What is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? 3Hr 4. What major equipment will be used if any (worl< over rig, drilling rig, Backhoe and operator for equ1 pment etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE; If Chiing

112

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

81 81 Project lnfonnation Project Title: CBM Gas Separator Date: 2-23-2010 DOE Code: 6720-020-51131 Contractor Code: Project Lead: Mark Duletsky Project Overview None anticipated, uses producing well on pre-existing location. 1. What are the environmental impacts? 48-2-X-28 Location, 447' FSL. 2495 FWL, SE, SW, Sec. 28, T39N, R78W, Natrona County. Wyoming USA 2. Wnat is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? 5days 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, Forkfift. winch truck. water truck etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Special ist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NO'TE: H Change of Scope occurs, Proj ect Lead m u st $ubmlt a new NEPA Compllance Suntey and

113

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Project lnfonnation Project Title: NODA 2. Reclamation of decommissioned Date: 8/4/2011 batteries, test satellites, and facilities DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Overview NODA 2. Reclamation of decommissioned batteries, test satellites, and 1. Brief project description [include facilities : anything that could impact the environment] ex 81 .3 and ex 86.1 Small-scale, short-term cleanup actions including excavation or consolidation of contaminated soils, removal of equipment and underground piping , drainage control, and reseeding. NOD req uired to ensure compliance with Reclamation Procedures. The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

114

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

~ ~ -o ~ ~ -o Project lnfonnation Project Title: Replace Down Guy Rod 24~3 Date: 11/30/09 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Mike Preston Project Overview Replace Down Guy Rod Emergency The pole was ready to Break Wire 5' above the ground 1. What are the environmental impacts? 24-SHX-3 2. What is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? 5 hr 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc,)? Back hole The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTe If Change of Scope oe~. Project Lead must sutlmft a new NEPA ColT pll~ Sunley and c ontact the T echnical Assurance Department. Impacts If YES, then complete below

115

Tax Compliance and Public Goods Provision -- An Agent-based Econophysics Approach  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We calculate the dynamics of tax evasion within a multi-agent econophysics model which is adopted from the theory of magnetism and previously has been shown to capture the main characteristics from agent-based based models which build on the standard Allingham and Sandmo approach. In particular, we implement a feedback of public goods provision on the decision-making of selfish agents which aim to pursue their self interest. Our results imply that such a feedback enhances the moral attitude of selfish agents thus reducing the percentage of tax evasion. Two parameters govern the behavior of selfish agents, (i) the rate of adaption to changes in public goods provision and (ii) the threshold of perception of public goods provision. Furtheron we analyze the tax evasion dynamics for different agent co mpositions and under the feedback of public goods provision. We conclude that policymakers may enhance tax compliance behavior via the threshold of perception by means of targeted public relations.

Hokamp, S

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

116

INTERPRETATION REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARD...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

THE APPLICATION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARD 1027-92, HAZARD CATEGORIZATION AND ACCIDENT ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLIANCE WITH DOE ORDER 5480.23, NUCLEAR SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTS,...

117

TOPIC Brief BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM Choosing an Energy Code Compliance Path TOPIC BRIEF 1  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Choosing an Energy Code Compliance Path TOPIC BRIEF 1 Choosing an Energy Code Compliance Path TOPIC BRIEF 1 Choosing an Energy Code Compliance Path One challenge that awaits any building designer is choosing the appropriate compliance path through the applicable building energy code. This is not a trivial decision-energy codes are marvels of flexibility, offering multiple compliance paths to suit all types of designers. E ach path has its own pluses and minuses, which may include differences in stringency, complexity, and potentially even limitations on building designs. This topic brief focuses on the compliance paths that are available in the following model codes and standards: * 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) and 2012

118

Arçelik A.Ş: Compliance Determination (2010-SE-0105) | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Arçelik A.Ş: Compliance Determination (2010-SE-0105) Arçelik A.Ş: Compliance Determination (2010-SE-0105) Arçelik A.Ş: Compliance Determination (2010-SE-0105) August 30, 2010 DOE issued a Notice of Compliance Determination after test results revealed that Arçelik's Blomberg BRFB1450 refrigerator-freezer complies with the applicable energy conservation standards. DOE reviewed test results from Arçelik and also performed DOE testing on four units of the product. The DOE had issued a subpoena for information and production of documents requesting test data from Arçelik A.Ş, after DOE received information indicating that Arçelik's Blomberg BRFB1450 model refrigerator-freezer exceeds the applicable Federal energy conservation standards. Arçelik A.Ş: Compliance Determination (2010-SE-0105) More Documents & Publications

119

TOPIC Brief BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM BIM and Demonstrating Code Compliance TOPIC BRIEF 1  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

BIM and Demonstrating Code Compliance TOPIC BRIEF 1 BIM and Demonstrating Code Compliance TOPIC BRIEF 1 Building Information Modeling and Demonstrating Code Compliance Demonstrating or verifying compliance with codes, standards, or other criteria governing building design is achieved through a set of specific tasks. These include producing construction documents; providing specifications for the products, materials, equipment, and systems to be used; and describing how they come together to create the envisioned building. W hen building construction documents and specifications are produced, they should include all information necessary to prescribe how the building is to be constructed. Plans and specifications should be readily usable to verify compliance with prescriptive requirements of codes, standards, or other desired

120

Regulatory Compliance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Regulatory Compliance Regulatory Compliance Regulatory Compliance This photo shows the inside the K West Basin facility, where workers are retrieving highly radioactive sludge material under 17 feet of water. This photo shows the inside the K West Basin facility, where workers are retrieving highly radioactive sludge material under 17 feet of water. The Department of Energy is not a regulatory agency; however it does self-regulate its own radioactive waste. DOE is also affected by a variety of statutes, legislation, regulations, directives and guidance. Many of the current compliance-related actions revolve around waste and material disposition. These include National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Environmental Impact Statements and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) Records of Decision. Links, below,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "ii compliance standards" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Project_!.!!formatlon Doll!r Reseed~ ~u.pment and Ol.mp lludts The table below Ia to be completed by the Project Lead and ,.vi-ed by the Envwonmental Spec1ull.r ao\d the DOll NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE, If Ch *r :,r· ol .ir.Uf · OC" '" , PtOj

122

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

. NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY Project lnfonnation Project Title: Reclamation of Pits and Boxes Date: Nov. 3, 2010 DOE Code: 6740.010.00000 Contractor Code: 8067-451 Project Lead: Anthony Bowler Project Overview Reclamation of QD.]y the following Pits and Boxes : 1. Brief project description [include 1. B-2-1 0 Skim Box anything that could impact the 2. B-1-14 Skim Box environment 3. Near66-1-STX-14 Pit 2. Legal location 4. T-5-10 Skim Box 3. Duration of the project 5. WDFUpperPit 6. WDFLowerPit 4. Major equipment to be used 7. WDFSkimBox 8. B-1-3 Pit 9. B-1 -3 Skim Box 10. T-2-34 Pit 11 . B-1-10 Pit 12. B-1 -10 Skim Box 13. SE of SG3 & Welding Shop Skim Box 14. 58.Q4-1-SX-3 Skim Box 15. Near Tank 126 Skim Box 16. 77-1-SX-3 NW of Well Pit 17. T-5-3 Pit

123

Environmental Compliance Management System  

SciTech Connect

Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) is developing the Environmental Compliance Management System (ECMS) as a comprehensive, cost-effective tool to ensure (1) that the Laboratory complies with all applicable federal and state environmental laws and regulations, (2) that environmental issues and concerns are recognized and considered in the early phases of projects; and (3) that Laboratory personnel conduct Laboratory operations in the most environmentally acceptable manner. The ECMS is an expert computer system which is designed to allow project engineers to perform an environmental evaluation of their projects. The system includes a Master Program which collects basic project information, provide utility functions, and access the environmental expert modules, environmental expert system modules for each federal and state environmental law which allows the user to obtain specific information on how an individual law may affect his project; and site-specific databases which contain information necessary for effective management of the site under environmental regulations. The ECMS will have the capability to complete and print many of the necessary environmental forms required by federal and state agencies, including the Department of Energy.

Brownson, L.W.; Krsul, T.; Peralta, R.A. [Argonne National Lab., Idaho Falls, ID (United States); Knudson, D.A.; Rosignolo, C.L. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States)

1992-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

124

Hazardous Waste Compliance Program Plan  

SciTech Connect

The Hazardous Waste Compliance Program Plan (HWCPP) describes how the Rocky Flats Plant institutes a more effective waste management program designed to achieve and maintain strict adherence to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) requirements. Emphasis is given to improve integration of line operations with programmatic and functional support activities necessary to achieve physical compliance to RCRA regulated equipment, facilities and operations at the floor level. This program focuses on specific activities occurring or which need to occur within buildings containing RCRA regulated units and activities. The plan describes a new approach to achieving and maintaining compliance. This approach concentrates authority and accountability for compliance with the line operating personnel, with support provided from the programmatic functions. This approach requires a higher degree of integration and coordination between operating and program support organizations. The principal changes in emphases are; (1) increased line operations involvement, knowledge and accountability in compliance activities, (2) improved management systems to identify, correct and/or avoid deficiencies and (3) enhanced management attention and employee awareness of compliance related matters.

Potter, G.L.; Holstein, K.A.

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

125

Scholastic Standards Scholastic Standards  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Scholastic Standards _______________ 1.8 Page 1 Scholastic Standards Center for Advising-7095 Gaye DiGregorio, Executive Director Scholastic standards are mandated by the faculty through the Faculty Council Committee on Scholastic Standards. Procedures relative to scholastic standards

126

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Project Information Project Title: WhisperGen Relocation to 65-S-1 0 j.,.. I~ 6 T -9-?t. / I f I ii?J { Date: 3116/2010 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Everett Walker r - - Project Overview ~ E £ N c. 5 ,;;g: z II(_ 5/ Z?fo 9 )cl- I'J c. '5 :::JT Z""'O ( ID 1 1 1 tJ 'I)! Jo~ What are the environmental The Environmental Specialist and the Field Coordinator visited location and discussed the o owing activity. 1. The unit will be within 120' radius of65-S10 wellhead location. The WhisperGen unit gas supply and power impacts? line to 65-S-1 0 will be buried. A six foot by six foot concrete pad. moved from the test's previous location, will be placed on the ground as a base for the unit. 2. What is the legal location? 65-S-10

127

Step 2. Identify the Code and Compliance Path | Building Energy Codes  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2. Identify the Code and Compliance Path 2. Identify the Code and Compliance Path It is important to review the submitted documentation and identify which code was used for the building. Next, to determine whether the building complies with that code, the path used to demonstrate compliance must be identified. There are several compliance paths available in the 2009 and 2012 IECC and ASHRAE Standards 90.1-2007 and 90.1-2010. Each of these codes/standards contains a prescriptive path that clearly states specific requirements. Prescriptive paths limit design freedom. Each of these codes/standards also has a performance-based path that provides more design freedom and can lead to innovative design, but involves more complex energy simulations and tradeoffs between systems. Residential and smaller commercial buildings

128

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY NEPA Review Routing Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA Review Routing Form NEPA Review Routing Form A ::opy of Compliance Surveys for rev.ew. Revised 812/1 0 mjt Originator: Technical Assurance Department - Enylronmental Group D ocument Name: ~a'5 ll:?f\ " B-rr . J(j Bur I e.d ~ (ec-tr ; rJL{ u ~ Documont Numbor: 3 a 5 Date or Routing: ~ I~ I a() II Namo Roviowod Signature Date (~~ Thaf I CUt 1 -f CJ./ W./11 ~ A /rt ...... "" . A-~ r;;;;I £1 "3 7i7 .-J;_~~· ~~ / ' I" - 4 ' . # / . - . 1 ?9 '1' l p /=-- Z-4-11 ,_, y~ -- - - - - - - - - ~ L- ·~~ ,....... ,_ ,.,.. ....... , "'t _,.., , ....... '" / / /1 /7/1....., ,..I\. / / I F r-Q V C. .L> I \ I I ..... Forwarded Forwarded To Date i-t l.tlbrub ~ r:H:.. ~rrr

129

EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Compliance for  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Alternative Compliance for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets to someone by E-mail Share EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Compliance for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Facebook Tweet about EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Compliance for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Twitter Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Compliance for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Google Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Compliance for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Delicious Rank EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Compliance for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Digg Find More places to share EPAct Transportation Regulatory

130

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

lnfonnat lnfonnat lon Project Title: Geothennal Technologies Program I Date : II0/20/09 DOE Code: 6730.020.61 041 I Contractor Code: lso67-73t Project Lead: Lyle Johnson TillS NEPA is for the laying of a 2.975 foot. 8" welded plastic wata ltnc from Lillie Teall<'!(~ Project Overview 1. 'Mlat are the environmental ncar in the Intersection with Teapot Creek to the North Waterllood Facility (NW F) building. The impacts? entire project area is within Section 21 T39N R 78W (map attached) and will not impact any wet 2. 'Mlat is the legal location? land areas but will cross one in tcnnittcnt stream. The stream is presently dry. The project will 3. 'Mlat is the duration of the project? include the clearing of vegetation from a 12 foot wide construction corridor along the route, digging

131

The College Station Residential Energy Compliance Code  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The City of College Station, Texas adopted a new residential Energy Compliance Code in January, 1988. The code, which strengthens compliance requirements in several areas, has received broadly based support and acceptance from all major constituent...

Claridge, D. E.; Schrock, D.

1988-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

132

Code Compliance Technical Meeting: Building Technologies Office  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Compliance Compliance Technical Meeting: Building Technologies Office Department of Energy Washington, DC APRIL 2013 1 Welcome Welcome to The Building Technologies Office's Code Compliance Technical Meeting and to Washington, DC. On behalf of the Department of Energy Building Technology Office (BTO), we would like to thank you for attending, for your participation. The goal of this meeting is to review and discuss ongoing projects and existing activities that improve compliance with model energy codes. DOE

133

WICF Certification, Compliance and Enforcement webinar | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Certification, Compliance, and Enforcement Overview for Refrigerators, Refrigerator-Freezers, Freezers, Dehumidifiers, Room Air Conditioners, Clothes Washers, Clothes...

134

The effect of the proposed use of any credible evidence to determine compliance on utilities  

SciTech Connect

Reference test methods are the only means currently available to determine compliance with air quality emission standards. All parties involved acknowledge that this excludes the use of data from continuous monitoring systems (CMS) to determine compliance with many air quality regulations. However, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is proposing to finalize portions of the 1993 Enhanced Monitoring (EM) rule that would allow the use of any credible evidence (ACE) to determine compliance with air emission limitations (including CMS data). This position has been taken by the USEPA in spite of strenuous objections that the 1993 rule has been subsequently replaced with the more relevant 1995 Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) rule. The use of ACE to determine compliance will have a significant impact on utilities due to the large number and type of air quality regulations that affect utilities; specifically, subparts D and Da of the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and regulations implementing Title IV (the Acid Rain Program) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) which require the use of CMS. These monitoring systems produce large amounts of emission data that are submitted to the USEPA, State, and/or local regulators agencies and, once submitted, become public record. Any interested party, either the regulator or the public, can use the data to show non-compliance with applicable standards; therefore, the use of ACE to determine compliance will substantially increase a utility`s liability. This paper discusses: (1) the regulatory history behind what data can be considered in determining compliance, (2) the potential implications of the ACE rule on utilities, and (3) the potential implications of the ACE rule on the development of a compliance demonstration plan for the Title V operating permit.

Lowery, K.P. [Trinity Consultants Inc., Overland Park, KS (United States); Facca, G.L. [IES Utilities Inc., Cedar Rapids, IA (United States)

1997-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

135

Pushing using Compliance Dennis Nieuwenhuisen  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, but also exploits the power of compliance. 1 Introduction Over the years various techniques have been developed that address the problem of navigating through or interacting with a real or virtual world by an autonomous robot. An example of manipulation is a robot arm in a manufacturing plant that needs to insert

Utrecht, Universiteit

136

Threat Insight Quarterly Regulatory Compliance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

X-Force ® Threat Insight Quarterly Regulatory Compliance www.iss.netwww.iss.net October 2006 #12 Risk Index ..............................................11 Future X-Force Threat Insight Quarterly Internet Security Systems X-Force® Threat Insight Quarterly > October 2006 ©2006 Internet Security Systems

137

Fleet Compliance Results for MY 2010/FY 2011, EPAct Alternative Fuel Transportation Program: State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleet Compliance Annual Report (Brochure)  

SciTech Connect

This annual report summarizes the compliance results of state and alternative fuel provider fleets covered by the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct) for model year 2010/fiscal year 2011. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) regulates covered state and alternative fuel provider (SFP) fleets under the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct), as amended. For model year (MY) 2010, the compliance rate for the 2911 covered SFP fleets was 100%. Fleets used either Standard Compliance or Alternative Compliance. The 279 fleets that used Standard Compliance exceeded their aggregate MY 2010 acquisition requirements by 61%. The 12 covered fleets that complied using Alternative Compliance exceeded their aggregate MY 2010 petroleum-use-reduction requirements by 89%. Overall, DOE saw modest decreases from MY 2009 in biodiesel fuel use credits earned and in the number of light-duty vehicles (LDVs) acquired. Compared to years before MY 2009, these rates were far lower. Because covered fleets acquired fewer new vehicles overall in MY 2010, the requirement for alternative fuel vehicles (AFVs), which is proportional to new acquisitions, also dropped.

Not Available

2012-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

138

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Emergency Emergency Management Qualification Standard Reference Guide JUNE 2009 Table of Contents i LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ ii ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................................. i PURPOSE...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ...........................................................................................................................................

139

Step 10. Get Assistance on Energy Code and Compliance Questions | Building  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

10. Get Assistance on Energy Code and Compliance Questions 10. Get Assistance on Energy Code and Compliance Questions Direct assistance on building energy code compliance questions is available from several sources. In addition, there are many training courses available to learn more about specific code requirements. Resources Contact the local jurisdiction having authority BECP Helpdesk ICC Technical Opinions and Interpretations ASHRAE Standards Interpretations ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2007 ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2010 BECP Training Courses Residential Requirements of the 2009 IECC Residential Requirements of the 2012 IECC Commercial Building Envelope Requirements of the 2009 IECC Commercial Lighting Requirements of the 2009 IECC Commercial Mechanical Requirements of the 2009 IECC Requirements of ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2007

140

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

lnfonnatlon lnfonnatlon Project Title: Advanced Formation Evaluation Tools Date: 12-6-2010 DOE Code: 6730.020.51144 Contractor 8067-795 Code: Proj ect Lead: Frank Ingham Project Overview DrillS 1/2" hole through Tenslee12 with an Lggging Whi~ Drilling (LWD). Wor1< will consist of 1. Brief project description [include anything that could impact the environment) re~ated drilling and lggging , more drilling and going bi!ck !o lgg th!il ~!Qn, my!!jQie times, Will change out LWD assemb~ ang re~a! mutti12le tim!il:i, Wor1< is on an existing hole utilizing 2. Legal location !ilxi§ting ~ui12ment. Kicks, fires and fliud release are all ootential environmental hazards. 3. Duration of the project Standard Ol2!i!rating 12radices will be utilized to monitQr drilling o~rations. l2!0Q wor1< will be

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "ii compliance standards" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

NPT Compliance | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Compliance | National Nuclear Security Administration Compliance | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog NPT Compliance Home > Our Mission > Managing the Stockpile > NPT Compliance NPT Compliance Maintaining the safety, security and effectiveness of the nuclear deterrent without nuclear testing - especially at lower numbers - requires

142

Executive Order 12088: Federal Compliance with Pollution Control Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The head of each Executive agency is responsible for ensuring that all necessary actions are taken for the prevention, control, and abatement of environmental pollution with respect to Federal...

143

PG&E's Renewable Portfolio Standard & Greenhouse Gas Compliance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

) in 2 0 2 0 AB3 2 in 2 0 2 0 Required by AB32: 427 MMT · Per AB32, emissions from all sources cannot exceed 1990 levels in 2020. · Per ARB regulation, 1990 emissions are deemed to be 427 MMT. This is 80 MMT Electric and Natural Gas Sectors Energy Efficiency 12 Renewables 11 Other 2 Transportation Low Carbon Fuel

144

DOE standard: Radiological control  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy (DOE) has developed this Standard to assist line managers in meeting their responsibilities for implementing occupational radiological control programs. DOE has established regulatory requirements for occupational radiation protection in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 835 (10 CFR 835), ``Occupational Radiation Protection``. Failure to comply with these requirements may lead to appropriate enforcement actions as authorized under the Price Anderson Act Amendments (PAAA). While this Standard does not establish requirements, it does restate, paraphrase, or cite many (but not all) of the requirements of 10 CFR 835 and related documents (e.g., occupational safety and health, hazardous materials transportation, and environmental protection standards). Because of the wide range of activities undertaken by DOE and the varying requirements affecting these activities, DOE does not believe that it would be practical or useful to identify and reproduce the entire range of health and safety requirements in this Standard and therefore has not done so. In all cases, DOE cautions the user to review any underlying regulatory and contractual requirements and the primary guidance documents in their original context to ensure that the site program is adequate to ensure continuing compliance with the applicable requirements. To assist its operating entities in achieving and maintaining compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835, DOE has established its primary regulatory guidance in the DOE G 441.1 series of Guides. This Standard supplements the DOE G 441.1 series of Guides and serves as a secondary source of guidance for achieving compliance with 10 CFR 835.

Not Available

1999-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

145

EA-1155: Ground-water Compliance Activities at the Uranium Mill Tailings  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5: Ground-water Compliance Activities at the Uranium Mill 5: Ground-water Compliance Activities at the Uranium Mill Tailings Site, Spook, Wyoming EA-1155: Ground-water Compliance Activities at the Uranium Mill Tailings Site, Spook, Wyoming SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts for the proposal to comply with the Environmental Protection Agency's ground-water standards set forth in 40 CFR 192 at the Spook, Wyoming Uranium Mill Tailings Site by using the selected alternative stated in the Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Ground Water Project. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD March 1, 1997 EA-1155: Final Environmental Assessment Ground-water Compliance Activities at the Uranium Mill Tailings Site,

146

U.S. Federal Facility Compliance Agreement for the Hanford Site, February 7, 1994 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Radionuclide for Radionuclide NESHAP State Washington Agreement Type Federal Facility Compliance Agreement Legal Driver(s) CAA Scope Summary Bring DOE's Hanford site into compliance with CAA Parties EPA; DOE; Richland Operations Office (RL) Date 02/07/1994 SCOPE * Bring DOE's Hanford site into compliance with CAA. This Compliance Plan contains a schedule for DOE to evaluate the monitoring systems associated with Designated Stacks to ensure that these systems conform to the standards for continuous monitoring systems in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 61, Subpart H. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * Beginning 30 days after the effective date of this Agreement, DOE shall submit quarterly progress reports to EPA until the requirements contained in Amendment A

147

DOE NEPA Compliance Officers | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Officers NEPA Compliance Officers are listed first for Program Offices, then Power Marketing Administrations, then Field Offices. NCODirectory100214.pdf More Documents &...

148

Automated Security Compliance Tool for the Cloud.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

?? Security, especially security compliance, is a major concern that is slowing down the large scale adoption of cloud computing in the enterprise environment. Business (more)

Ullah, Kazi Wali

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

149

Section 15: Content of Compliance Recertification Application...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Content of Compliance Recertification Application(s) (40 CFR 194.15) United States Department of Energy Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Carlsbad Field Office Carlsbad, New Mexico...

150

Title II Disposal Sites Annual Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This report presents the results of long-term surveillance and maintenance activities conducted by the DOE Office of Legacy Management in 2013 at six uranium mill tailings disposal sites reclaimed under Title II of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) of 1978. These activities verified that the UMTRCA Title II disposal sites remain in compliance with license requirements.

151

PARS II Process Document - Project Phasing | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers (EERE)

PARS II Process Document - Project Phasing.pdf More Documents & Publications Proposed Data Elements for PARS II Web Application Slide 1 PARS II Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)...

152

3Compliance Status 2004 SITE ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

3-1 3Compliance Status 2004 SITE ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT DRAFT Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL County Department of Health Services. Thirty reportable spills of petroleum products or antifreeze status #12;3-22004 SITE ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT CHAPTER 3: COMPLIANCE STATUS DRAFT 3.2.2 New or Modified

153

Environmental Compliance Audit& Assessment Program Manual  

SciTech Connect

This document describes the elements, schedule, roles, and responsibilities of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) Environmental Compliance Audit & Assessment Program (ECAAP). The ECAAP has been developed to meet the requirements of DOE Order 450.1A,1 and Executive Order 13423.2 These referenced Orders stipulate that government agencies must develop environmental compliance audit programs to monitor and improve compliance with environmental regulations. As stated specifically in the DOE Order, as a part of a DOE facility's Environmental Management System (EMS), 'An environmental compliance audit and review program that identifies compliance deficiencies and root causes of non-compliance' shall be developed and implemented. The ECAAP has also been developed to satisfy LBNL's institutional technical assurance assessment requirements promulgated in the Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Self-Assessment Program (LBNL/PUB-5344) and described by the ES&H Technical Assurance Program (TAP) Manual (LBNL/PUB-913E). The ES&H TAP Manual provides the framework for systematic reviews of ES&H programs with the intent to provide assurance that these programs comply with their guiding regulations, are effective, and are properly implemented. As required by the DOE and Executive Orders and by LBNL's TAP, the goal of the ECAAP is to identify environmental regulatory compliance deficiencies and to determine their respective causes. The ECAAP then provides a means of correcting any deficiencies identified, and leads to continually improving environmental compliance performance.

Thorson, Patrick; Baskin, David; Borglin, Ned; Fox, Robert; Wahl, Linnea; Hatayama, Howard; Pauer, Ronald

2009-03-13T23:59:59.000Z

154

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Biennial Environmental Compliance Report  

SciTech Connect

This Biennial Environmental Compliance Report (BECR) documents compliance with environmental regulations at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), a facility designed and authorized for the safe disposal of transuranic (TRU) radioactive waste. This BECR covers the reporting period from April 1, 2004, to March 31, 2006. As required by the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act (LWA) (Public Law [Pub. L.] 102-579, as amended by Pub. L. 104-201), the BECR documents United States (U.S.) Department of Energy (DOE) compliance with regulations and permits issued pursuant to the following: (1) Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 191, Subpart A, "Environmental Standards for Management and Storage"; (2) Clean Air Act (CAA) (42 United States Code [U.S.C.] 7401, et seq.); (3) Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA) (42 U.S.C. 6901-6992, et seq.); (4) Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) (42 U.S.C. 300f, et seq.); (5) Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) (15 U.S.C. 2601, et seq.); (6) Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. 9601, et seq.); and all other federal and state of New Mexico laws pertaining to public health and safety or the environment.

Washington Regulatory and Environmental Services

2006-10-12T23:59:59.000Z

155

Got Standards? "Got Standards?"  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

certifications available. Some of these certifications include ISO 9002 1994, ISO 9003 1994 and ISO 9001 in order to bring harmony to global standards for international trade. Enter ISO 9000. The Basics In order to fully understand the concept of ISO 9000, it is very important to have a good idea of what a standard is

Vardeman, Stephen B.

156

POLICY GUIDANCE MEMORANDUM #35 Procedures for Compliance with...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 Procedures for Compliance with Nepotism and Misuse of Position POLICY GUIDANCE MEMORANDUM 35 Procedures for Compliance with Nepotism and Misuse of Position The purpose of this...

157

2014-04-17 DOE Certification, Compliance, and Enforcement Overview...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

04-17 DOE Certification, Compliance, and Enforcement Overview for Plumbing Products 2014-04-17 DOE Certification, Compliance, and Enforcement Overview for Plumbing Products This...

158

DOE Publishes Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Regarding the Compliance...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Regarding the Compliance Date for the Dehumidifier Test Procedure DOE Publishes Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Regarding the Compliance Date for the Dehumidifier Test Procedure...

159

Technical Assistance: Increasing Code Compliance - 2014 BTO Peer...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Assistance: Increasing Code Compliance - 2014 BTO Peer Review Technical Assistance: Increasing Code Compliance - 2014 BTO Peer Review Presenter: Rosemarie Bartlett,...

160

Energy Code Compliance and Enforcement Best Practices (Text Version...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Code Compliance and Enforcement Best Practices (Text Version) Energy Code Compliance and Enforcement Best Practices (Text Version) Curtis Framel: Good afternoon, and good...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "ii compliance standards" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

South Valley Compliance Agreement Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

South Valley South Valley Agreement Name South Valley Superfund Site Interagency Agreement State New Mexico Agreement Type Compliance Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary Interagency Agreement with the U.S. Air Force for payment of costs associated with the remediation of two operable units (the facility and San Jose 6) at the South Valley Superfund Site. Parties DOE; U.S. Air Force Date 9/26/1990 SCOPE * Set forth the actions required of the USAF and DOE to fulfill their respective responsibilities pursuant to the Settlement Agreement between DOE, USAF, and General Electric Company (8/29/1990). * Establish mechanism by which DOE will transfer, to a fund managed by the USAF, its share of the costs set forth in the Settlement Agreement. * Set forth each party's responsibilities and respective share of costs.

162

A postmortem assessment of environmental compliance of a high-level radioactive waste repository, Hanford Site, Washington  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

to the accessible environment, a period of time during which the waste must be contained within the barrier, and acceptable release rates from the barrier. Based on these generic standards, a postmortem assessment of the potential for environmental compliance... regulatory time frame. The degree of regulatory geochemical retardation needed in the system in order to guarantee compliance with cumulative mass release limits at the accessible environment over a period of 10, 000 years is evaluated for the nuclides...

Petrini, Rudolf Harald Wilhelm

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

163

The Impact of Environmental Compliance Costs on U.S. Refining Profitability  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

The Impact of Environmental Compliance Costs on U.S. Refining Profitability October 1997 Energy Information Administration Office of Energy Markets and End Use U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 This report was prepared by the Energy Information Administration, the independent statistical and analytical agency within the Department of Energy. The information contained herein should not be construed as advocating or reflecting any policy position of the Department of Energy or any other organization. Energy Information Administration/The Impact of Environmental Compliance Costs on U.S. Refining Profitability ii Contacts The Impact of Environmental Compliance Costs on U.S. Refining Profitability was prepared in the Office of Energy Markets and End Use of the Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy under the general direction of W. Calvin

164

Commission on Energy Efficiency Standards and Practices  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Final Report to the Governor Final Report to the Governor and the Iowa General Assembly Submitted in Compliance with Iowa Code Section 103A.27 January1, 2011 Commission on Energy Efficiency Standards and Practices Commission on Energy Efficiency Standards and Practices 2 Table of Contents Commission Members page 3 Executive Summary page 4 Summary of Recommendations page 5 Legislative Overview page 12 Profile on Iowa's Energy Usage page 14 Commission Proceedings page 15 Recommendations Energy Code Adoption & Compliance page 20 Financing & Incentives page 25 Training and Education page 29 Licensing and Certification page 31 Additional Energy Efficiency Recommendations page 32

165

PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION (IPUC) RPS PROCUREMENT & COMPLIANCE PLAN (SBX1 2)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION (IPUC) RPS PROCUREMENT & COMPLIANCE PLAN (SBX1 2) CITY OF INDUSTRY California's Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) requirements for publically owned utilities (POU Energy Resources Act, Senate Bill 2 1st Ex. Session ("SBX1 2") requires utilities to achieve 33% RPS

166

FAQS Qualification Card Environment Compliance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

A key element for the Departments Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA).

167

STANDARDS OF CONDUCT A MESSAGE FROM THE CHANCELLOR  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

STANDARDS OF CONDUCT A MESSAGE FROM THE CHANCELLOR Dear Faculty and Staff: At Vanderbilt University standards and lawful conduct. The Vanderbilt University Compliance Program articulates specifically what is expected of us, and completing the Standards of Conduct training will ensure that you have a thorough

Bordenstein, Seth

168

University of Connecticut Health Center (UCHC) Compliance Officers Committee  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

University of Connecticut Health Center (UCHC) Compliance Officers Committee Charter The Compliance of Connecticut Chief Audit, Compliance and Ethics Officer shall serve on the committee as ex officio as a non-voting member. The University of Connecticut Chief Audit, Compliance and Ethics Officer has appointed

Michel, Robert G.

169

Environmental Compliance Performance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Compliance » Environmental Compliance » Environmental Compliance Performance Environmental Compliance Performance Most Office of Environmental Management (EM) cleanup is being performed under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) through Federal Facility Agreements as well as under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) through various consent orders, agreements, and decrees with states. These agreements and orders identify milestones associated with cleanup actions and dates by which those milestones are to be met. DOE has approximately 40 agreements and orders in place with its State and Federal regulators dealing with EM's cleanup mission. Major enforceable milestones are those which have fixed, mandatory due dates and, in EM's view, represent cleanup progress. EM's senior

170

Aspects on damper-attachment compliance  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This paper investigates how attachment compliance coming from mounting bushings or brackets affects damper efficiency. Analyses with a simple mass-spring-damper system show that compliance in damper-attachment points reduces the damper efficiency. If however vibration isolation of the mass is considered, it may be seen that compliance increases low frequency vibrations but reduces high frequency vibrations. Through analyses of this system, the relative damping ratio is studied as a function of excitation frequency and attachment stiffness. Numerical values of typical damper-attachment stiffness in heavy vehicles are furthermore obtained from both static finite element (FE) analysis of the chassis frame and from dynamic FE analysis of a tractor. The effect damper-attachment compliance has on vehicle behaviour is finally quantified with MBS simulations of a tractor semi trailer combination. It is found that attachment stiffness should be considered when simulating load cases containing high frequency inputs.

Peter Holen; Mathias Zellinger

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

171

Fracture compliance estimation using borehole tube waves  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We tested two models, one for tube-wave generation and the other for tube-wave attenuation at a fracture intersecting a borehole that can be used to estimate fracture compliance, fracture aperture, and lateral extent. In ...

Bakku, Sudhish Kumar

172

Business Models for Code Compliance | Building Energy Codes Program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Compliance Compliance Site Map Printable Version Development Adoption Compliance Basics Compliance Evaluation Software & Web Tools Regulations Resource Center Business Models for Code Compliance The U.S. Department of Energy is coordinating strategies and activities with companies, individuals, and government entities to demonstrate, quantify, and monetize energy code compliance and coordinate deployment at the local, state, and regional levels. Consumer Assurance through Code Compliance Energy efficiency measures in the buildings sector, if properly realized and captured, provide a tremendous opportunity to reduce energy consumption and expenditures. Yet currently there is a lack of assurance that buildings as designed realize the levels of energy efficiency established in the

173

Idaho CERCLA Disposal Facility Complex Compliance Demonstration for DOE Order 435.1  

SciTech Connect

This compliance demonstration document provides an analysis of the Idaho CERCLA Disposal Facility (ICDF) Complex compliance with DOE Order 435.1. The ICDF Complex includes the disposal facility (landfill), evaporation pond, administration facility, weigh scale, and various staging/storage areas. These facilities were designed and constructed to be compliant with DOE Order 435.1, Resource Conservation and Recovery act Subtitle C, and Toxic Substances Control Act polychlorinated biphenyl design and construction standards. The ICDF Complex is designated as the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) facility for the receipt, staging/storage, treatment, and disposal of INL Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) waste streams.

Simonds, J.

2007-11-06T23:59:59.000Z

174

Design Compliance Matrices to ANSI and OSHA  

SciTech Connect

U.S. Department of Energy Letter 98-SFD-028 requested Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc. to provide clarifications as to compliance with ANSI 57.1, 57.2, 57.9, and 29 CFR 1910.179 (OSHA), in the form of an item-by-item compliance matrix, for the CSB. This Supporting Document contains Fluor Daniel, Inc.'s response for use by Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc. regarding the clarifications requested by the U.S. Department of Energy.

BENDIXSEN, R.B.

2000-04-03T23:59:59.000Z

175

Renewable Resource Standard | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Renewable Resource Standard Renewable Resource Standard Renewable Resource Standard < Back Eligibility Investor-Owned Utility Retail Supplier Savings Category Bioenergy Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Solar Wind Program Info State Montana Program Type Renewables Portfolio Standard Provider Montana Public Service Commission Montana's renewable portfolio standard (RPS), enacted in April 2005 as part of the Montana Renewable Power Production and Rural Economic Development Act, requires public utilities and competitive electricity suppliers to obtain a percentage of their retail electricity sales from eligible renewable resources according to the following schedule: * 5% for compliance years 2008-2009 (1/1/2008 - 12/31/2009) * 10% for compliance years 2010-2014 (1/1/2010 - 12/31/2014)

176

Conservation Standards Enforcement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 8, 2010 September 8, 2010 ASKO Appliances: Compliance Determination (2010-SE-0601) DOE tested four units dishwasher manufactured by ASKO Appliances, Inc. Applying statistical analysis, DOE found that the dishwasher meets the federal energy standards for maximum energy use. August 30, 2010 Arçelik A.Ş: Compliance Determination (2010-SE-0105) DOE issued a Notice of Compliance Determination after test results revealed that Arçelik's Blomberg BRFB1450 refrigerator-freezer complies with the applicable energy conservation standards. August 24, 2010 Leader Electronics: Noncompliance Determination (2010-SE-2301) DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Leader Electronics, Inc. finding that "NU50-2093400-I3(NU50-21090-300F)" and "MU03-F050040-A1(MU03-Fl050-AKOS)" of external power supplies do not

177

Technical Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Review for Technical Standards of Interest Legend: Red Technical Standards Program Activities and Responsibilities Blue Directives Program Activities and Responsibilities...

178

Conservation Standards Enforcement | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Conservation Standards Enforcement Conservation Standards Enforcement Conservation Standards Enforcement The Office of the General Counsel is working to ensure that manufacturers of consumer products and commercial equipment meet the nation's conservation standards. Through its new focus on enforcement, the Department of Energy will save money for consumers and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. "For the sake of our environment and our economy, it's critical that we enforce our energy efficiency regulations," said Scott Blake Harris, former DOE General Counsel. "Strong enforcement of the rules will encourage compliance and keep manufacturers who break the law from having a competitive advantage over manufacturers who play by the rules." DOE enforces the energy and water conservation standards

179

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office Office HOME ABOUT ENERGY EFFICIENT TECHNOLOGIES RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS APPLIANCE & EQUIPMENT STANDARDS BUILDING ENERGY CODES EERE » Building Technologies Office » Appliances & Equipment Standards About Standards & Test Procedures Implementation, Certification & Enforcement Rulemakings & Notices Further Guidance ENERGY STAR® Guidance and Frequently Asked Questions This webpage is designed to provide guidance and answer Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the U.S. Department of Energy's appliance standards program. Guidance types span all covered products and covered equipment and cover such topics as: definitions, scope of coverage, conservation standards, test procedures, certification, Compliance and Certification Management System (CCMS), and enforcement. This website offers users an

180

Standard costs for labor  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

STANDARD COSTS FOR LABOR A Thesis By MD. NURUL ABSAR KHAN Submitted to the Graduate School of the Agricultural and Mechanical College of Texms in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION... Administration and the government of East Pakistan. CONTENTS Chapter Page I. Introduction and Prelisd. nary Discussion II. Installation and Accounting Aspects of Standard Costs for Labor III, Recording~ Analysing and Reporting of Labor Vaxlances . 45 IV...

Khan, Mohammed Nurul Absar

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "ii compliance standards" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Setting Environmental Standards: A Statistician's Perspective  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In order to protect the population from adverse health effects due to pollution of air, water and soil of using compliance monitoring networks to assess health effects of air pollution. #12;2. A statistical value of pollution, measured or actual, not to be exceeded. We consider the standard for ozone

Washington at Seattle, University of

182

Conservation Standards Enforcement: Importer Q&As  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA), as amended, an importer is a manufacturer. Therefore, an importer is held to the same standard as a domestic manufacturer -- just as though the importer had built the product(s) it imports. These FAQs are designed to help an importer identify key issues to consider to ensure compliance.

183

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

726 726 Recipien, _ity of Wichita, KS ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewers Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Century II Cardboard Recycling B5.1 None Occupancy Sensors for Lighting Controls for City Hall B5.1 Waste stream, Historic Preservation and engineering clauses. Energy efficient chiller and cooling tower for Environmental Services building B5.1 Waste stream, historical preservation, engineering clauses. New equipment cannot result in a net increase in air emissions. Comprehensive Community Energy Efficiency & Air Emissions Program A9, All, B5.1 All administrative activities, audits, outreach, and technical advice should be CX'd. All EE activities are subject to the

184

INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Industrial Industrial Hygiene Qualification Standard Reference Guide DECEMBER 2009 This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents i LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ ii ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ iv PURPOSE...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ...........................................................................................................................................

185

TECHNICAL TRAINING QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Technical Training Qualification Standard Reference Guide December 2009 This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents i LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ ii ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ iii PURPOSE...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ...........................................................................................................................................

186

WEAPONS QUALITY ASSURANCE QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Weapon Weapon Quality Assurance Qualification Standard Reference Guide AUGUST 2009 This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents i LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ ii ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ iv PURPOSE...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ...........................................................................................................................................

187

EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Compliance Methods for State  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Compliance Methods for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets to someone by E-mail Share EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Compliance Methods for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Facebook Tweet about EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Compliance Methods for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Twitter Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Compliance Methods for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Google Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Compliance Methods for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Delicious Rank EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Compliance Methods for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Digg Find More places to share EPAct Transportation Regulatory

188

Assessment of compliance costs resulting from implementation of the proposed Great Lakes water quality guidance  

SciTech Connect

The primary purpose of the study was to develop an estimate of the incremental cost to direct dischargers resulting from the implementation of the proposed Great Lakes Water Quality Guidance (GLWQG). This estimate reflects the incremental cost of complying with permit requirements developed using the Implementation Procedures and water quality criteria proposed in the GLWQG versus permit requirements based on existing State water quality standards. Two secondary analyses were also performed, one to develop a preliminary estimate of the costs that would be incurred by indirect dischargers to publicly owned treatment works (POTWs), and another to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the GLWQG. Finally, several sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of several major assumptions on the estimated compliance costs. To estimate compliance costs, permit limitations and conditions based on existing State water quality standards were compared to water quality-based limitations and conditions based on the proposed GLWQG criteria and Implementation Procedures for a sample of plants. The control measures needed to comply with the proposed GLWQG-based effluent limitations were evaluated. Individual plant compliance costs were estimated for these control measures based on information on treatment technology and cost analyses available in the literature. An overall compliance cost was projected from the sample based on statistical methods.

Fenner, K.; Podar, M.; Snyder, B.

1993-04-16T23:59:59.000Z

189

Brand Standards Brand StandardsBrand Standards  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Brand Standards 6.6.11 #12;Brand StandardsBrand Standards VISUAL IDENTITY AND BRANDING INITIATIVE, the visual image presented to the public by the units of the University and UMMC often is confusing the organizations' public image under a cohesive, easily recognized visual identity that relies upon a common

Weber, David J.

190

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2009 Report  

SciTech Connect

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program (EMAC), funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office, monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada Test Site and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NTS biota. This report summarizes the programs activities conducted by National Security Technologies, LLC, during calendar year 2009. Program activities included (a) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (b) desert tortoise compliance, (c) ecosystem mapping and data management, (d) sensitive plant species monitoring, (e) sensitive and protected/regulated animal monitoring, (f) habitat monitoring, (g) habitat restoration monitoring, and (h) monitoring of the Nonproliferation Test and Evaluation Complex. During 2009, all applicable laws, regulations, and permit requirements were met, enabling EMAC to achieve its intended goals and objectives.

Dennis J. Hansen, David C. Anderson, Derek B. Hall, Paul D. Greger, and W. Kent Ostler

2010-07-13T23:59:59.000Z

191

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2008 Report  

SciTech Connect

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program, funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO), monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada Test Site (NTS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NTS biota. This report summarizes the programs activities conducted by National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec), during calendar year 2008. Program activities included (a) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (b) desert tortoise compliance, (c) ecosystem mapping and data management, (d) sensitive plant species monitoring, (e) sensitive and protected/regulated animal monitoring, (f) habitat monitoring, (g) habitat restoration monitoring, and (h) monitoring of the Nonproliferation Test and Evaluation Complex (NPTEC).

Dennis J. Hansen, David C. Anderson, Derek B. Hall, Paul D. Greger, W. Kent Ostler

2009-04-30T23:59:59.000Z

192

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2012 Report  

SciTech Connect

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program (EMAC), funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office (NNSA/NFO, formerly Nevada Site Office), monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NNSS biota. This report summarizes the programs activities conducted by National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec), during calendar year 2012. Program activities included (a) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (b) desert tortoise compliance, (c) ecosystem monitoring, (d) sensitive plant species monitoring, (e) sensitive and protected/regulated animal monitoring, (f) habitat restoration monitoring, and (g) monitoring of the Nonproliferation Test and Evaluation Complex (NPTEC). During 2012, all applicable laws, regulations, and permit requirements were met, enabling EMAC to achieve its intended goals and objectives.

Hall, Derek B.; Anderson, David C.; Greger, Paul D.; Ostler, W. Kent; Hansen, Dennis J.

2013-07-03T23:59:59.000Z

193

Development of the NIST Rocky Flats Soil Standard  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Rocky Flats Soil-II Standard reference material (SRM) ... values and uncertainties for the radionuclides in the Rocky Flats Soil II SRM.

S. Nour; K. Inn; J. Filliben

2008-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

194

Mechanical Systems Qualification Standard  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

61-2008 61-2008 June 2008 DOE STANDARD MECHANICAL SYSTEMS QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1161-2008 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ DOE-STD-1161-2008 iv INTENTIONALLY BLANK DOE-STD-1161-2008 v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENT................................................................................................................ vii PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................................1

195

Testing of the EURATOM LCT coil in the toroidal arrangement of the International Fusion Superconducting Magnet Test Facility without external pulsed fields (standard-1) and with them (standard II) and an extended single-coil test  

SciTech Connect

Testing of the European LCT coil, a forced-flow NbTi coil, with the five other coils in the International Fusion Superconducting Magnet Test Facility (IFSMTF) has been in progress since the beginning of 1986. By the end of July 1987, the Euratom-LCT coil had passed a single-coil test, a test in toroidal configuration with and without poloidal field transients, and an extended single-coil test up to its design limits. In this test, the coil reached, in stable operation, a field of 9 T at 140% of rated current. It reached the short-sample values of the strands used in the cable. The coil was operated up to 8 T with and without poloidal field transients in a toroidal configuration. The mass flow rate was reduced by a factor of 5 compared with the design value without any visible impact on stability. Averaged ac losses (winding, 14 W; case, 7 W) were measured under LCT specified poloidal field pulses, and the findings agreed with those of the short-sample measurements. The mechanical properties behaved as predicted by calculations. No global movement of the winding in the coil case was found, although the coil has already experienced 50% (14MN) of the maximum out-of-plane force. The operating limits were determined by measuring the current-sharing temperature. It was found that the helium mass flow rate had an impact on the hot-spot temperature of a normal region. All results obtained demonstrate that the applied technology has achieved reliable engineering standards.

Friesinger, G.; Gauss, S.; Komarek, P.; Lubell, M.S.; McManamy, T.J.; Maurer, W.; Shen, S.S.; Siewerdt, L.; Ulbricht, A.; Wuchner, F.

1988-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

196

Technical Standards Newsletter - August 2012 | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2012 Inside this issue: Featured DOE Technical Standards Activities DOE Technical Handbook, Accident Investigation and Prevention, Volumes I and II is Released Workshops and...

197

Conduct of Operations and Quality Assurance Compliance  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this document is to present and detail the deliverables for the Tiger Team Action Plan, Finding MF-11, and milestones in the FY92 Performance Appraisal for Conduct of Operations from Sandia National Laboratories to DOE. The ``Proposal for Reporting Conduct of Operations & Quality Assurance Compliance to DOE`` describes what the deliverables shall be. Five major steps that result in the development of line practices are covered in this document. These line practices specify what Sandia will do to comply with the above DOE management orders. The five steps include: hazard classification; programmatic risk classification; management grouping; compliance plan; and corporate reporting.

Andrews, N.S.

1992-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

198

Conduct of Operations and Quality Assurance Compliance  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this document is to present and detail the deliverables for the Tiger Team Action Plan, Finding MF-11, and milestones in the FY92 Performance Appraisal for Conduct of Operations from Sandia National Laboratories to DOE. The Proposal for Reporting Conduct of Operations Quality Assurance Compliance to DOE'' describes what the deliverables shall be. Five major steps that result in the development of line practices are covered in this document. These line practices specify what Sandia will do to comply with the above DOE management orders. The five steps include: hazard classification; programmatic risk classification; management grouping; compliance plan; and corporate reporting.

Andrews, N.S.

1992-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

199

Standards, Ethics  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Standards, Ethics Ombuds Standards and Ethics Committed to the fair and equitable treatment of all employees, contractors, and persons doing business with the Laboratory. Contact...

200

Savannah River Site Approved Site Treatment Plan, 2001 Annual Update (Volumes I and II)  

SciTech Connect

The Compliance Plan Volume (Volume I) identifies project activity scheduled milestones for achieving compliance with Land Disposal Restrictions. Information regarding the technical evaluation of treatment options for SRS mixed wastes is contained in the Background Volume (Volume II) and is provided for information.

Lawrence, B.

2001-04-30T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "ii compliance standards" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 USE OF VOLUNTARY CONSENSUS STANDARDS AND INTERACTION WITH STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards Washington, D.C. 20585 Standards Use / Participation DOE-TSPP-3 Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 i PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK DOE-TSPP-3 Standards Use / Participation Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 DOE Technical Standards Program ii CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE.............................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability.............................................................................................................. 1

202

Federal Energy Management Program: EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

EISA Compliance EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data on AddThis.com... Requirements by Subject Requirements by Regulation Notices & Rules

203

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OF MILITARY LANDS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

· Environmental Database Development and Management · Storm Water Modeling #12;ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OF MILITARY LANDS CEMML of environmental managers. The Center provides assistance to environmental managers in compliance areas such as air

204

Department of Energy - Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance ...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Policy and Compliance Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: Department of Energy - Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance Abstract This website...

205

Alternative Compliance Program: 10 CFR Part 490 (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect

Presentation explains the Alternative Compliance option under the U.S. Department of Energy's State and Alternative Fuel Provider program.

Sears, T.

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

206

3Compliance Status 2003 SITE ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

3-1 3Compliance Status 2003 SITE ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL supply met all drinking water requirements. Groundwater monitoring at the Major Petroleum Facility reported to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). Twenty-two reportable

Homes, Christopher C.

207

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2007 Report  

SciTech Connect

In accordance with U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Order 450.1, 'Environmental Protection Program', the Office of the Assistant Manager for Environmental Management of the DOE, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) requires ecological monitoring and biological compliance support for activities and programs conducted at the Nevada Test Site (NTS). National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec), Ecological Services has implemented the Ecological Monitoring and Compliance (EMAC) Program to provide this support. EMAC is designed to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations, delineate and define NTS ecosystems, and provide ecological information that can be used to predict and evaluate the potential impacts of proposed projects and programs on those ecosystems. This report summarizes the EMAC activities conducted by NSTec during calendar year 2007. Monitoring tasks during 2007 included eight program areas: (a) biological surveys, (b) desert tortoise compliance, (c) ecosystem mapping and data management, (d) sensitive plant monitoring, (e) sensitive and protected/regulated animal monitoring, (f) habitat monitoring, (g) habitat restoration monitoring, and (h) biological monitoring at the Nonproliferation Test and Evaluation Complex (NPTEC). The following sections of this report describe work performed under these eight areas.

Dennis Hansen, David Anderson, Derek Hall, Paul Greger, W. Kent Ostler

2008-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

208

Compliance Status 2012 SITE ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

dioxide from the Central Steam Facility were all within permit limits. There were nine unexpected opacity was submitted to address the non-compliance findings. Emissions of nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, and sulfur of the light path brought recorded opacity readings back to normal; other opacity excursions reported

209

Rocky Flats Compliance Program; Technology summary  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy (DOE) established the Office of Technology Development (EM-50) (OTD) as an element of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management (EM) in November 1989. The primary objective of the Office of Technology Development, Rocky Flats Compliance Program (RFCP), is to develop altemative treatment technologies for mixed low-level waste (wastes containing both hazardous and radioactive components) to use in bringing the Rocky Flats Plant (RFP) into compliance with Federal and state regulations and agreements. Approximately 48,000 cubic feet of untreated low-level mixed waste, for which treatment has not been specified, are stored at the RFP. The cleanup of the Rocky Flats site is driven by agreements between DOE, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Colorado Department of Health (CDH). Under these agreements, a Comprehensive Treatment and Management Plan (CTMP) was drafted to outline the mechanisms by which RFP will achieve compliance with the regulations and agreements. This document describes DOE`s strategy to treat low-level mixed waste to meet Land Disposal Restrictions and sets specific milestones related to the regulatory aspects of technology development. These milestones detail schedules for the development of technologies to treat all of the mixed wastes at the RFP. Under the Federal Facilities Compliance Act (FFCA), the CTMP has been incorporated into Rocky Flats Plant Conceptual Site Treatment Plan (CSTP). The CSTP will become the Rocky Flats Plant site Treatment Plan in 1995 and will supersede the CTMP.

NONE

1994-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

210

COMPLIANCE SUMMARY 1997 BNL Site Environmental Report 2 -1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

COMPLIANCE SUMMARY 1997 BNL Site Environmental Report 2 - 1 Chapter 2 COMPLIANCE SUMMARY regulations and DOE Orders. This section briefly summarizes the compliance status for existing facilities to regulatory permits. They include one SPDES permit, a Major Petroleum Facility (MPF) license, two Resource

211

The effects of ankle compliance and flexibility on ankle sprains  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The effects of ankle compliance and flexibility on ankle sprains IAN C. WRIGHT, RICHARD R. NEPTUNE. J VAN DEN BOGERT, and B. M. NIGG. The effects of ankle compliance and flexibility on ankle sprains was to examine the influence of changes in subtalar joint flexibility and compliance on ankle sprain occurrence

212

Standards and Procedures for Promotion and Tenure  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Appendix C Standards and Procedures for Promotion and Tenure I. Preamble This document sets forth standards and procedures for faculty promotions and appointments to tenure. These standards and procedures by university needs, plans, and resources. II. Standards The criteria outlined below are, of necessity

Heller, Barbara

213

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2013 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third

214

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011

215

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2013 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2013 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2013 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2010

216

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012

217

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012

218

Monitoring, Verification and Reporting: Improving Compliance Within Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Monitoring, Verification and Reporting: Improving Compliance Within Energy Monitoring, Verification and Reporting: Improving Compliance Within Energy Efficient Programs Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary Name: Monitoring, Verification and Reporting: Improving Compliance Within Energy Efficient Programs Agency/Company /Organization: International Energy Agency Sector: Energy Focus Area: Energy Efficiency Topics: GHG inventory, Policies/deployment programs Resource Type: Guide/manual Website: www.iea.org/papers/pathways/monitoring.pdf Monitoring, Verification and Reporting: Improving Compliance Within Energy Efficient Programs Screenshot References: Monitoring, Verification and Reporting: Improving Compliance Within Energy Efficient Programs[1] This document includes: A brief overview of MVE in the context of S&L programmes.

219

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012

220

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09 09 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "ii compliance standards" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First

222

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009

223

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2011

224

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2010 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2010 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2010 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2010

225

The Standards Forum - December 1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 – December 1998 3 – December 1998 The Standards News on the DOE Technical Standards Program Forum Volume 6 – Number 3 – December 1998 UN I T E D S T A T ES O F A M E R I C A D E P A R T M E N T O F E N E R G Y A Note From the Manager ............. 2 TSP Publications Support Moved ... 2 INSIDE THIS ISSUE (Continued on Page 14) Role of Federal Government .......... 2 TSM Spotlight ................................ 3 Topical Committees ....................... 4 Standards Actions .......................... 7 News Briefs ................................... 11 ISO 9000 Compliance .................... 14 Upcoming Meetings ....................... 15 1999 TSP Workshop ...................... 15 Mailing Addresses .......................... 16 Fourth Integrated Safety Management Lessons Learned Workshop On October 20-22, 1998, the Fourth Integrated Safety Man-

226

Idaho CERCLA Disposal Facility Complex Compliance Demonstration for DOE Order 435.1  

SciTech Connect

This compliance demonstration document provides an analysis of the Idaho CERCLA Disposal Facility (ICDF) Complex compliance with DOE Order 435.1. The ICDF Complex includes the disposal facility (landfill), evaporation pond, admin facility, weigh scale, decon building, treatment systems, and various staging/storage areas. These facilities were designed and are being constructed to be compliant with DOE Order 435.1, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Subtitle C, and Toxic Substances Control Act polychlorinated biphenyl design and construction standards. The ICDF Complex is designated as the central Idaho National Laboratory (INL) facilityyy for the receipt, staging/storage, treatment, and disposal of INL Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) waste streams. This compliance demonstration document discusses the conceptual site model for the ICDF Complex area. Within this conceptual site model, the selection of the area for the ICDF Complex is discussed. Also, the subsurface stratigraphy in the ICDF Complex area is discussed along with the existing contamination beneath the ICDF Complex area. The designs for the various ICDF Complex facilities are also included in this compliance demonstration document. These design discussions are a summary of the design as presented in the Remedial Design/Construction Work Plans for the ICDF landfill and evaporation pond and the Staging, Storage, Sizing, and Treatment Facility. Each of the major facilities or systems is described including the design criteria.

J. Simonds

2006-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

227

Status of Waste Isolation Pilot Plant compliance with 40 CFR 191B, December 1992  

SciTech Connect

Before disposing of transuranic radioactive waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), the US Department of Energy (DOE) must evaluate compliance with long-term regulations of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) is conducting iterative performance assessments (PAs) of the WIPP for the DOE to provide interim guidance while preparing for final compliance evaluations. This paper describes the 1992 preliminary comparison with Subpart B of the Environmental Standards for the Management and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level and Transuranic Radioactive Wastes (40 CFR 191), which regulates long-term releases of radioactive waste. Results of the 1992 PA are preliminary, and cannot be used to determine compliance or noncompliance with EPA regulations because portions of the modeling system and data base are incomplete. Results are consistent, however, with those of previous iterations of PA, and the SNL WIPP PA Department has high confidence that compliance with 40 CFR 191B can be demonstrated. Comparison of predicted radiation doses from the disposal system also gives high confidence that the disposal system is safe for long-term isolation.

Marietta, M.G.; Anderson, D.R.

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

228

Compliance with Energy Codes | Building Energy Codes Program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Compliance with Energy Codes Compliance with Energy Codes Energy code compliance must be achieved to realize the considerable benefits inherent in energy codes. BECP supports successful compliance by making no-cost compliance tools, REScheck(tm) and COMcheck(tm), and other resources widely available to everyone. BECP has also developed several resources to help states uniformly assess the rate of compliance with their energy codes for residential and commercial buildings. It is important to note that regardless of the level of enforcement, as a law the building owner/developer is ultimately responsible to comply with the energy code. Compliance will be increased if the adopting agency prepares the building construction community to comply with the energy code and provides resources to code officials to enforce it.

229

Puerto Rico - Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Puerto Rico - Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard Puerto Rico - Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard Puerto Rico - Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard < Back Eligibility Utility Savings Category Bioenergy Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Solar Home Weatherization Wind Program Info Program Type Renewables Portfolio Standard Provider Energy Affairs Administration Note: Compliance for this standard does not begin until 2015. Additional rules and regulations are needed to implement this law; this record will be updated periodically as the rules are developed. In July 2010, Puerto Rico enacted the island's first Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard in an effort to spur renewable energy development as well as reduce Puerto Rico's dependence on imported foreign oil (Puerto

230

Enforcement Policy Statement: Compliance Period for Regional...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

energy conservation standards for residential furnaces, central air conditioners, and heat pumps, including regional standards for different product types in indicated States....

231

EPA Regulation Compliance | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

below: Mercury and Air Toxics Standards for Electric Generation Units - MATS Cross State Air Pollution Rule - CSAPR Carbon Pollution Standards for New Power Plants - 111(b) Carbon...

232

Compliance, HQ GILMAD J&ILL STUDY  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

r-tin E. Biles, Director, DivFsi_on of Safety, Standards and r-tin E. Biles, Director, DivFsi_on of Safety, Standards and Compliance, HQ GILMAD J&ILL STUDY The enclosed report ccntains the result of a survey of desisated areas of Gilman E%ll on the University of Californ-ia at Berkeley Cnrr,pls . The survey ~2s conducted by re~rcsentatives of the Lzwrence Lahorator?es. The third floor and b? veyed. c.sOzsnt floor areas were sur- prior Selection of areas for srlrvey was based on the history of use associated with the I~lanhattan Project and/or early Atomic Energy Coaik5sion activities. IThilc the ;.esults of the survey show the presence of low levels of restdual activity in the two areas surveyed, it is clear that these levels represent r?o health hazard. Key fi~diugs are as follow : 1. Entire survey was free of removable contaxiilation.

233

Nonresident Alien Tax Compliance: A Guide for Institutions Making Payments to Foreign Students, Scholars, Employees, and Other International Visitors Volume One by  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Nonresident Alien Tax Compliance: A Guide for Institutions Making Payments to Foreign Students.S. citizens, (ii) permanent resident aliens (i.e., "green card holders") and immigrants, (iii) resident aliens for tax purposes, and (iv) Nonresident aliens for tax purposes.' `There are two tests that are used

Dyer, Bill

234

Los Alamos National Laboratory Compliance Order, October 4, 1995 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Facility Compliance Order Federal Facility Compliance Order State New Mexico Agreement Type Compliance Agreement Legal Driver(s) New Mexico Hazardous Waste Act (NMHWA)/ FFCAct /RCRA Scope Summary Require compliance with a Site Treatment Plan for the treatment of mixed waste at Los Alamos National Lab. Parties DOE; University of California; New Mexico Environment Department Date 10/04/1995 SCOPE * Require compliance with a Site Treatment Plan for the treatment of mixed waste at Los Alamos National Lab. * Bring the Los Alamos National Lab into compliance with the requirements for the storage and treatment of mixed waste under RCRA and the NMHWA. * Establish that DOE and the University of California have both joint and several liability for meeting the conditions of the agreement.

235

Final Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Slick Rock, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Impact Impact Ground Water Compliance at the Slick Rock, Colorado, UMTRA Project Sites AGENCY: U.S. DEP.4RTMENT OF ENERGY ACTIOK: FL&-DING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMP-ACT (FONSI) SU$IM$RY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) plans to implement ground lvater compliance strategies for two Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTR.4) Project sites near Slick Rock. Colorado. The purpose of the strategies is to comply with U.S. En\.ironmental Protection .Qency (EP.Aj ground n'ater standards defined in Title 40 Codr ~fF~d~w/ iieplutio?r.s (CFR) Part 192. and in so doing. protect human health and the en\.ironment. Ground water at the Slick Rock sites is contaminated with residual radioactive materials from hisTorica acti\,ities, associated with the processin of uranium ore, The planned action (~formeri>,.

236

Reliability, Compliance and Security of Web?based Pre/Post?testing  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Pre/post testing is an important tool for improving science education. Standard in?class administration has drawbacks such as lost class time and converting data into electronic format. These are not issues for unproctored web?based administration but there are concerns about assessment validity compliance rates and instrument security. A preliminary investigation compared astronomy students taking pre/post tests on paper to those taking the same tests over the web. The assessments included the Epistemological Beliefs Assessment for Physical Science and a conceptual assessment developed for this study. Preliminary results on validity show no significant difference on scores or on most individual questions. Compliance rates were similar between web and paper on the pretest and much better for web on the posttest. Remote monitoring of student activity during the assessments recorded no clear indication of any copying printing or saving of questions and no widespread use of the web to search for answers.

Scott Bonham

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

237

Training Standardization  

SciTech Connect

The article describes the benefits of and required process and recommendations for implementing the standardization of training in the nuclear power industry in the United States and abroad. Current Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) enable training standardization in the nuclear power industry. The delivery of training through the Internet, Intranet and video over IP will facilitate this standardization and bring multiple benefits to the nuclear power industry worldwide. As the amount of available qualified and experienced professionals decreases because of retirements and fewer nuclear engineering institutions, standardized training will help increase the number of available professionals in the industry. Technology will make it possible to use the experience of retired professionals who may be interested in working part-time from a remote location. Well-planned standardized training will prevent a fragmented approach among utilities, and it will save the industry considerable resources in the long run. It will also ensure cost-effective and safe nuclear power plant operation.

Agnihotri, Newal

2003-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

238

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fourth Quarter Fourth Quarter FY2009 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2010

239

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fourth Quarter Fourth Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012

240

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

First Quarter First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "ii compliance standards" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Second Quarter Second Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010

242

Lighting Development, Adoption, and Compliance Guide BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM I  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lighting Development, Adoption, and Compliance Guide BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM I Lighting Development, Adoption, and Compliance Guide BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM I Lighting BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM Development, Adoption, and Compliance Guide Lighting BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM September 2012 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 | PNNL-SA-90653 Development, Adoption, and Compliance Guide 3.3 Exterior Lighting Controls ...........................................................................24 3.3.1 Dusk to Dawn Controls ...............................................................................25 3.3.2 Lighting Power Reduction Controls ........................................................25 3.3.3 Parking Garage Controls ............................................................................26

243

Exploring Partnerships to Further Building Code Compliance Enhancement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This presentation, given through the DOE's Technical Assitance Program (TAP), identifies opportunities for municipal and state partnerships to ensure better building code compliance.

244

Perception of petroleum profits tax compliance in Nigeria.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

??The aim of this research is to examine whether the extent of tax compliance by oil producing companies in Nigeria is determined by the knowledge, (more)

Oremade, Babatunde Timothy

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

245

CHP: A Technical & Economic Compliance Strategy - SEE Action...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Action Webinar, January 2012 This presentation, "IndustrialCommercialInstitutional Boiler MACT - Combined Heat and Power: A Technical & Economic Compliance Strategy," by John...

246

2014-10-06 DOE Certification, Compliance, and Enforcement Overview...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Dehumidifiers, Room Air Conditioners, Clothes Washers, Clothes Dryers, and Dishwashers 2014-10-06 DOE Certification, Compliance, and Enforcement Overview for Refrigerators,...

247

Executive Vice President- Compliance, Audit, and Risk Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This announcement has been amended to remove the requirement for a Department of Energy security clearance. Bonneville Power Administration's (BPA) compliance landscape continues to expand at a...

248

Environmental Protection- Industrial Compliance (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Industrial Compliance Section develops and administers Certificates of Approval for the Construction and/or Operation of various industrial facilities. Industries with air emissions and/or...

249

Administrative Compliance Order HWB-14-21 Waste Isolation Pilot...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

issues this Administrative Compliance Order ("Order") to the United States Department of Energy ("DOE"), and Nuclear Waste Partnership, LLC ("NWP"; collectively, with DOE, the...

250

EPA - Permit Compliance System webpage | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

System webpage Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: EPA - Permit Compliance System webpage Abstract This webpage contains EPA's Permit...

251

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Second Quarter Second Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012

252

WICF Certification, Compliance and Enforcement webinar  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WICF Testing, Certification, WICF Testing, Certification, Compliance, and Enforcement Overview August 30, 2011 2 | Building Technologies Program & General Counsel's Office of Enforcement eere.energy.gov Agenda 2 Certified Ratings 3 1 Testing Basic Model Enforcement 4 5 Manufacturer How to Submit Questions 6 3 | Building Technologies Program & General Counsel's Office of Enforcement eere.energy.gov Manufacturer Explanation A Manufacturer of a WICF * Is a domestic manufacturer or an importer. * Produces a component of a walk-in cooler or walk-in freezer that affects energy consumption, including, but not limited to, refrigeration, doors, lights, windows, or walls.

253

The Washington State Experience Energy Code Compliance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Washington State Experience Washington State Experience Residential Energy Code Compliance Gary Nordeen Senior Building Science Specialist April 4, 2013 WSU Energy Program Provides energy services, products, education and information for: * Businesses * Utilities ̶ public and private * Governments ̶ state and local * Tribes * Federal agencies * Manufacturing plants * Educational facilities * National laboratories WSU Energy Program Building Science Team * Residential energy code technical assistance * Voluntary programs, Northwest ENERGYSTAR Homes * Research and development, Building America * Community-based upgrade programs * Industry training and certifications ̶ HERS, BPI, ENERGY STAR, PTCS Staff provides building science expertise for: WSU Energy Program

254

2009 Compliance Recertification Application (2009 CRA) Compliance Application Review Document (CARD) No. 53  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

dissolved solids." The groundwater protection requirements limit releases to the maximum contamination level a bounding analysis of the concentrations of the contaminants to assess compliance (Subpart C of 40 CFR part is much less than the observed concentration of brine derived from the Salado anhydrite marker beds. Also

255

2009 Compliance Recertification Application (CRA-2009) Compliance Application Review Document (CARD) No. 23  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

the requirements for Section 194.23 (a)(1), EPA expected DOE's application to contain a complete, clear PA calculations. EPA found DOE in compliance with the requirements of Section 194.23 (a)(1 APPLICATION (CRA-2004 OR CRA04) (194.23(a)(1)) For the 2004 recertification DOE undertook an extensive

256

August 2012 TSP Standards Actions Newsletter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

dOe technical StandardS activitieS dOe technical StandardS activitieS * Featured DOE Technical Standards Activities * DOE Technical Handbook, Accident Investigation and Prevention, Volumes I and II is Released * Workshops and Events * Nuclear Energy Standards Coordination Collaborative Meeting * 2012 Chemical Safety and Life Cycle Management Workshop * Nuclear Safety- Related Standards Activity inSide thiS iSSue August 2012 Standards Actions Technical Standards Program Newsletter www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ Department of Energy Technical Handbook, Accident Investigation and Prevention, Volumes I and II, is Released In September 2009, the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Office of Corporate Safety Programs, Accident Investigation Program, began working with the Energy Federal Contractors

257

Renewables Portfolio Standard | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Renewables Portfolio Standard Renewables Portfolio Standard Renewables Portfolio Standard < Back Eligibility Investor-Owned Utility Municipal Utility Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative Savings Category Bioenergy Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Solar Wind Program Info State Delaware Program Type Renewables Portfolio Standard Provider Delaware Public Service Commission In 2005, [http://depsc.delaware.gov/electric/rpsact.pdf S.B. 74] established a renewables portfolio standard (RPS) requiring retail electricity suppliers to purchase 10% of the electricity sold in the state from renewable sources by 2019-2020 (the compliance year, or CY, runs from June - May). [http://legis.delaware.gov/LIS/lis144.nsf/vwLegislation/SB+19/$file/legis.html?open

258

Find Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

-Safe Use of Optical Fiber Communication Systems Utilizing Laser Diode and LED Sources API ASCE ASHRAE ASME ASME-BPVC ASQ ASSE ASTM AWS CGA standards - contact Timothy Lopez...

259

Data Standards  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Data standards are common terms and methods for sharing data and exchange of information, which are used uniformly. The World Health Organization has proposed : collection in specific data forms, in alogical...

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

260

Regulatory treatment of allowances and compliance costs  

SciTech Connect

The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA) established a national emission allowance trading system, a market-based form of environmental regulation designed to reduce and limit sulfur dioxide emissions. However, the allowance trading system is being applied primarily to an economically regulated electric utility industry. The combining of the new form of environmental regulation and economic regulation of electric utilities has raised a number of questions including what the role should be of the federal and state utility regulating commissions and how those actions will affect the decision making process of the utilities and the allowance market. There are several dimensions to the regulatory problems that commissions face. Allowances and utility compliance expenditures have implications for least-cost/IPR (integrated resource planning), prudence review procedures, holding company and multistate utility regulation and ratemaking treatment. The focus of this paper is on the ratemaking treatment. The following topics are covered: ratemaking treatment of allowances and compliance costs; Traditional cost-recovery mechanisms; limitations to the traditional approach; traditional approach and the allowance trading market; market-based cost recovery mechanisms; methods of determining the benchmark; determining the split between ratepayers and the utility; other regulatory approaches; limitations of incentive mechanisms.

Rose, K. [National Regulatory Research Institute, Columbus, OH (United States)

1993-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "ii compliance standards" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

COMPLIANCE STUDIES: WHAT ABOUT THE FISH?  

SciTech Connect

ABSTRACT It is understood that operational and structural conditions at hydroelectric facilities along with environmental conditions of the migration corridors affect the passage conditions for fish. Hydropower fish survival assessments at the individual- and population-level have progressed over the past decade with development of turbine simulation software and improvements in telemetry systems, in particular, micro-transmitters, cabled and autonomous receivers, and advanced statistical designs that provide precise estimates of passage routes and dam-passage survival. However, these approaches often ignore fish condition as a variable in passage and survival analyses. To account for fish condition effects on survival results, compliance statistical models often require increased numbers of tagged fish. For example, prior to and during migration, fish encounter numerous stressors (e.g., disease, predation, contact with structures, decompression events), all of which can cause physical and physiological stress, altering the probability of survival after passage through a dam or a series of dams. In addition, the effects of surgical transmitter implantation process or the transmitter itself may cause physiological stress, alter behavior, and/or decrease survival. Careful physiological evaluations can augment survival model assumptions, resultant data, and predictive scenarios. To exemplify this, surgeons concurrently noted fish condition and surgical implantation during a multi-dam compliance study in 2011. The analyses indicted that surgeon observations on fish condition and surgical outcomes were related to 24 h holding mortalities and fish that never detected after release. Short reach and long reach survival were related to surgical outcomes and fish condition, respectively.

Woodley, Christa M.; Fischer, Eric S.; Wagner, Katie A.; Weiland, Mark A.; Eppard, M. B.; Carlson, Thomas J.

2013-08-21T23:59:59.000Z

262

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY Project Information Project Title:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Dig d~ch from 24-51-5TX-1 0 to 24-AX-10 and reinstall electrical wire Dig d~ch from 24-51-5TX-1 0 to 24-AX-10 and reinstall electrical wire Date: 12120/2010 DOE Coda: Contractor Coda: Project Lead: Marcus Bruckner Project Overview 1 Dig ditch from 24-51-8TX-1 0 to 24-AX-10 and remove and replace electrical wire {N 2.7o') 1. Brief project desalptlon Pnclude anything that oould impact the 2. 24-51-5TX-10 and 24-AX-10 (SW r.tN 10TOWNSHIP 38 NORTH RANGE 78WEST) environment] 2. Leg allocation 3. 1 day 3. Duration of the project 4. Major equipment to be used 4. Backhoe The table below is to be completed by the Project Leed and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and contact the Technical Assurance Department.

263

Polarimetric Standardization  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The use of polarimetric techniques is nowadays widespread among solar and stellar astronomers. However, notwithstanding the recommandations that have often been made about the publication of polarimetric results in the astronomical literature, we are still far from having a standard protocol on which to conform. In this paper we review the basic definitions and the physical significance of the Stokes parameters, and we propose a standardization of the measurement of polarized radiation.

E. Landi Degl'Innocenti; S. Bagnulo; L. Fossati

2006-10-09T23:59:59.000Z

264

Quality assurance guidance for TRUPACT-II (Transuranic Package Transporter-II) payload control  

SciTech Connect

The Transuranic Package Transporter-II (TRUPACT-II) Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP) approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), discusses authorized methods for payload control in Appendix 1.3.7 and the Quality Assurance (QA) requirements in Section 9.3. Subsection 9.3.2.1 covers maintenance and use of the TRUPACT-II and the specific QA requirements are given in DOE/WIPP 89-012. Subsection 9.3.2.2 covers payload compliance, for which this document was written. 6 refs.

Not Available

1989-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

265

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program Fiscal Year 2003 Report  

SciTech Connect

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance program, funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office, monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada Test Site and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to Nevada Test Site biota. This report summarizes the program's activities conducted by Bechtel Nevada during fiscal year 2003.

Bechtel Nevada

2003-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

266

RESEARCH ARTICLE Aerodynamic and functional consequences of wing compliance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

RESEARCH ARTICLE Aerodynamic and functional consequences of wing compliance Andrew M. Mountcastle ?, the instantaneous shape of an insect wing is dictated by the interaction of aerodynamic forces with the inertial rever- sals--loads that well exceed the mean aerodynamic force. Although wing compliance has been

Daniel, Tom

267

SOUND COMPLIANCE MONITORING FOR THE GAMESA WIND TURBINE  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

SOUND COMPLIANCE MONITORING FOR THE GAMESA WIND TURBINE UD - LEWES, DELAWARE January 2011 ` #12;SOUND COMPLIANCE MONITORING FOR THE GAMESA WIND TURBINE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE LEWES, DELAWARE A Gamesa G90 2.0-MW wind turbine operates at the University of Delaware (UD), Lewes campus on a parcel

Firestone, Jeremy

268

STATE OF CALIFORNIA CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, PRESCRIPTIVE HVAC ALTERATIONS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, PRESCRIPTIVE HVAC ALTERATIONS CEC-MECH-1C-ALT-HVAC (Revised 07/10) CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE MECH-1C-ALT-HVAC Prescriptive HVAC Steps" column below. Note: After installation of HVAC units and/or ducts, the Installation

269

SAFETY SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Safety Software Safety Software Quality Assurance Qualification Standard Reference Guide MARCH 2011 This page intentionally left blank Table of Contents i LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ ii ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ iii PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................... 1 PREFACE ...................................................................................................................................... 1

270

NNSA PACKAGE CERTIFICATION ENGINEER QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NNSA Package NNSA Package Certification Engineer Qualification Standard Reference Guide FEBRUARY 2010 This page is intentionally blank. i Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ ii ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ iii PURPOSE...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ...........................................................................................................................................

271

TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transportation Transportation & Traffic Management Qualification Standard Reference Guide APRIL 2010 This page is intentionally blank. i LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ ii ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ iv PURPOSE...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ...........................................................................................................................................

272

DOE/EA-1312: Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Grand Junction UMTRA Project Site (Climax Uranium Millsite) (September 1999)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Rev. 0 Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Grand Junction UMTRA Project Site (Climax Uranium Millsite) Final September 1999 Prepared by U.S. Department of Energy Grand Junction Office Grand Junction, Colorado Work Performed Under DOE Contract No. DE-AC13-96GJ87335 for the U.S. Department of Energy EA of Ground Water Compliance at the Grand Junction UMTRA Project Site DOE Grand Junction Office Page ii Final September 1999 Contents Executive Summary.........................................................................................................................v 1.0 Introduction...............................................................................................................................1 1.1 Grand Junction UMTRA Project Site Location and Description.........................................1

273

Preliminary Comments on Compliance Plan and Request for Clarification or,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on Compliance Plan and Request for Comments on Compliance Plan and Request for Clarification or, in the Alternative, Rehearing of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission Preliminary Comments on Compliance Plan and Request for Clarification or, in the Alternative, Rehearing of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission Docket No. EO-05-01: Pursuant to Order No. 202-05-3, issued by the Department of Energy ("DOE") in the above-captioned docket on December 20, 2005 ("December 20 Order"), and Section 313 of the Federal Power Act ("FPA"), 16 U.S.C. § 8251, the District of Columbia Public Service Commission ("DCPSC") hereby submits its preliminary comments on the compliance plan ("Compliance Plan") proposed by MiranT Potomac River,

274

Compliance Order, Los Alamos National Security, LLC - July 12, 2007 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Compliance Order, Los Alamos National Security, LLC - July 12, 2007 Compliance Order, Los Alamos National Security, LLC - July 12, 2007 Compliance Order, Los Alamos National Security, LLC - July 12, 2007 July 12, 2007 Issued to Los Alamos National Security, LLC related to the Unauthorized Reproduction and Removal of Classified Matter from the Los Alamos National Laboratory The Compliance Order directs LANS to implement specific corrective actions to remediate both the laboratory management deficiencies that contributed to the thumb drive security incident at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) discovered in October 2006 and, more broadly, longstanding deficiencies in the classified information and cyber security programs at LANL. Violation of the Compliance Order would subject LANS to issuance of a notice of violation and assessment of civil penalties up to S100,000 per

275

Compliance Order, Los Alamos National Security, LLC - July 12, 2007 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Compliance Order, Los Alamos National Security, LLC - July 12, 2007 Compliance Order, Los Alamos National Security, LLC - July 12, 2007 Compliance Order, Los Alamos National Security, LLC - July 12, 2007 July 12, 2007 Issued to Los Alamos National Security, LLC related to the Unauthorized Reproduction and Removal of Classified Matter from the Los Alamos National Laboratory The Compliance Order directs LANS to implement specific corrective actions to remediate both the laboratory management deficiencies that contributed to the thumb drive security incident at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) discovered in October 2006 and, more broadly, longstanding deficiencies in the classified information and cyber security programs at LANL. Violation of the Compliance Order would subject LANS to issuance of a notice of violation and assessment of civil penalties up to S100,000 per

276

EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data October 8, 2013 - 2:06pm Addthis The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) provides links to reports and data illustrating Federal progress in meeting the requirements outlined in Section 432 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA) (42 U.S.C. 8253(f)) available through the EISA 432 Compliance Tracking System (CTS). EISA 432 CTS Data Levels Top-tier agency aggregates, representing all reported data subject to the EISA 432 requirements Facility-level detailed data that excludes information for facilities that have requested exemption from public disclosure for national-security purposes. Access Data Federal Government Compliance Overview: View key CTS metrics and aggregates

277

Standard Modeling  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Standard no es suficiente Standard no es suficiente Avanzar Volver Principal ESTOY PERDIDO!!! Si bien el Modelo Standard proporciona una descripción muy buena de los fenómenos observados en los experimentos, todavía es una teoría incompleta. El problema es que el Modelo Standard no puede explicar la causa por la que existen algunas partículas, del modo en que lo hacen. Por ejemplo, aún cuando los físicos conocían las masas de todos los quarks, a excepción de la del quark top desde hace muchos años, no podían simplemente predecir en forma exacta la masa del top, sin utilizar evidencia experimental, dado que el Modelo Standard carece de un modelo matemático para calcular el patrón que siguen los valores de las masas de las partículas. Otra cuestión está relacionada con el hecho que existen tres pares de

278

Synchrophasor Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Development & Support Development & Support Kenneth Martin martin@electricpowergroup.com June 27-28, 2013 Washington, DC DOE/OE Transmission Reliability Program 2 Introduction  Synchrophasor measurement systems widely deployed  Enable a new generation of power system monitor & control capability - Improved power system analysis & system models - Wide area, high-resolution visibility - Basis for a new generation of controls  Research challenge - standards to enable interoperability - Measurement performance - Communications  Research focus - facilitate development, testing, and validation of standards to promote interoperability Basic phasor concept well known . A phasor is the complex form of the AC waveform √2 A cos (2 π ω 0 t + φ) A e

279

Proposed Changes to Simplify Review of the Next WIPP Compliance Re-certification Application  

SciTech Connect

The amended Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Land Withdrawal Act (LWA) of 1996, P. L. 104-201, 110 Stat. 2422 [1], requires the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to prepare and submit documentation demonstrating continued compliance with the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) radioactive waste disposal standard 40 CFR Part 191 [2] every five years starting after first waste receipt in accordance with the criteria of 40 CFR 194 [3]. The DOE submitted the WIPP Compliance Certification Application (CCA) [4] to EPA in 1996 and it was approved by EPA in 1998. The first shipment of waste was received for disposal at WIPP on March 26, 1999. Subsequently, the first Compliance Re-certification Application (CRA) [5] was submitted to EPA on March 26, 2004. Reflecting on lessons learned from the previous applications, the DOE is proposing a change in the format for the next CRA due on March 26, 2009. The DOE has an objective to communicate plans, schedules and re-certification methodology as early as possible to EPA and stakeholders. With that objective in mind, the DOE began communicating the proposed new application strategy to the EPA in mid- 2006. For the 2009 CRA submittal, the DOE is proposing to align the document's format to match each section to the requirements of the WIPP compliance criteria at 40 CFR Part 194 [3] and the EPA re-certification support documents. The benefits of the revised format include improved integration of all regulatory, operational, and programmatic activities; easier access to historical information and decisions; a decreased level of effort for DOE, EPA and Stakeholder review; enhancing the likelihood of a quicker re-certification decision; and potentially reducing DOE's post-submittal CRA tasks. This paper will provide insight to those wishing to understand and be kept abreast of changes in the WIPP's certification process. (authors)

Patterson, R. [Department of Energy, Carlsbad Field Office, Carlsbad, NM (United States); Kouba, St.; Kolander, M. [Washington Group International, Washington Regulatory and Environmental Services, Carlsbad, NM (United States)

2008-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

280

Fire Protection Engineering Qualification Standard Reference Guide  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fire Protection Fire Protection Engineering Qualification Standard Reference Guide SEPTEMBER 2009 This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents i ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................. ii PURPOSE.......................................................................................................................................1 SCOPE ............................................................................................................................................1 PREFACE.......................................................................................................................................1 TECHNICAL COMPETENCIES................................................................................................3

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "ii compliance standards" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

RADIATION PROTECTION QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Radiation Radiation Protection Qualification Standard Reference Guide MARCH 2009 ii This page intentionally left blank iii Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... iv ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS and SYMBOLS ................................................................. v PURPOSE...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ...........................................................................................................................................

282

AVIATION SAFETY OFFICER QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Safety Safety Officer Qualification Standard Reference Guide MARCH 2010 i This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents ii LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... iii ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................... iv PURPOSE...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ...........................................................................................................................................

283

Safety Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

US DOE Workshop US DOE Workshop September 19-20, 2012 International perspective on Fukushima accident Miroslav Lipár Head, Operational Safety Section M.Lipar@iaea.org +43 1 2600 22691 2 Content * The IAEA before Fukushima -Severe accidents management * The IAEA actions after Fukushima * The IAEA Action plan on nuclear safety * Measures to improve operational safety * Conclusions THE IAEA BEFORE FUKUSHIMA 4 IAEA Safety Standards IAEA Safety Standards F undamental S afety Principles Safety Fundamentals f o r p ro te c ti n g p e o p l e a n d t h e e n v i ro n m e n t IAEA Safety Standards Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material 2005 E dit ion Safety Requirements No. T S-R-1 f o r p ro te c ti n g p e o p l e a n d t h e e n v i ro n m e n t IAEA Safety Standards Design of the Reactor Core for Nuclear Power Plants

284

Energy Efficiency Standard | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Efficiency Standard Energy Efficiency Standard Energy Efficiency Standard < Back Eligibility Investor-Owned Utility Retail Supplier Savings Category Other Program Info State Illinois Program Type Energy Efficiency Resource Standard The 2007 Illinois Power Agency Act (IPAA) requires both electric and natural gas utilities establish annual energy-savings goals and reduce energy delivered and peak demand. Utilities are required to file an energy efficiency and demand-response plan with the Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC) every three years, beginning in 2007. Electric Utility Compliance Electricity Sales Reduction The electricity reduction goals apply to utilities that had 100,000 or more customers on December 31, 2005. In February 2008, the ICC approved utility implementation plans for these requirements, available in Dockets

285

INTERPRETATION REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARD 1027-92,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

INTERPRETATION REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARD INTERPRETATION REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARD 1027-92, HAZARD CATEGORIZATION AND ACCIDENT ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLIANCE WITH DOE ORDER 5480.23, NUCLEAR SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTS, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF 10 C.F.R. § 830.202(b)(3). INTERPRETATION REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARD 1027-92, HAZARD CATEGORIZATION AND ACCIDENT ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLIANCE WITH DOE ORDER 5480.23, NUCLEAR SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTS, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF 10 C.F.R. § 830.202(b)(3). The following document is the Department of Energy Office of General Counsel interpretation regarding the application of DOE Technical Standard 1027-92, Hazard Categorization and Accident Analysis Techniques for Compliance with DOE Order 5480.23, Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports, under

286

Compliance testing of Grissom AFB, Central Heating Plant coal-fired boilers 3, 4 and 5, Grissom AFB, Indiana. Final report, 3-13 Dec 90  

SciTech Connect

Source compliance testing (particulates and visible emissions) of boiler 3, 4 and 5 in the Grissom AFB Central Heating Plant was accomplished 3-13 Dec 90. The boilers were all tested through the bypass stack. Visible emissions from the three boilers met applicable opacity regulations. However, particulate emissions from the three boilers were above their applicable emission standards.

Vaughn, R.W.

1991-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

287

Peer Review of Standards Rulemaking  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CHARGE CHARGE The Department of Energy (DOE) conducted the peer reviews in accordance with the requirements outlined in Bulletin from OMB (Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/fy2005/m05-03.pdf). The selection of reviewers, including consideration of expertise, panel balance, conflicts of interest, and independence; employment of the peer review mechanisms (e.g., letter reviews, panels, etc.); and maintenance of transparency of the review process were in compliance with OMB guidance. DOE assembled a panel of experts to review the analysis used in the standards rulemaking process. The peer review panel consisted of seven reviewers DOE determined to be qualified to evaluate the assigned group of analyses, in accordance with the Bulletin. Each group of analyses displayed some technical diversity. Therefore, in

288

Energy Standard  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Hall Hall October 2011 Analysis of Impacts of a Clean www.eia.gov U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA's data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the U.S. Department of Energy or other Federal agencies. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Analysis of Impacts of a Clean Energy Standard as requested by Chairman Hall i Contacts This report, Analysis of Impacts of a Clean Energy Standard as requested by Chairman Hall, was prepared under the

289

Energy Standard  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Bingaman Bingaman November 2011 Analysis of Impacts of a Clean www.eia.gov U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA's data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the U.S. Department of Energy or other Federal agencies. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Analysis of Impacts of a Clean Energy Standard as requested by Chairman Bingaman i Contacts This report, Analysis of Impacts of a Clean Energy Standard, as requested by Chairman Bingaman, was prepared

290

ECOLOGICAL MONITORING AND COMPLIANCE PROGRAM CALENDAR YEAR 2005 REPORT  

SciTech Connect

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance program (EMAC), funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO), monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada Test Site (NTS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NTS biota. This report summarizes the programs activities conducted by Bechtel Nevada (BN) during the Calendar Year 2005. Program activities included: (1) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (2) desert tortoise compliance, (3) ecosystem mapping and data management, (4) sensitive and protected/regulated species and unique habitat monitoring, (5) habitat restoration monitoring, and (6) biological monitoring at the Non-Proliferation Test and Evaluation Complex (NPTEC).

BECHTEL NEVADA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES

2006-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

291

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Biennial Environmental Compliance Report  

SciTech Connect

This Biennial Environmental Compliance Report (BECR) documents environmental regulatory compliance at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), a facility designed and authorized for the safe disposal of transuranic (TRU) radioactive waste, for the reporting period of April 1, 2002, to March 31, 2004. As required by the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act (LWA) (Public Law [Pub. L.] 102-579, as amended by Pub. L. 104-201), the BECR documents U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) compliance with applicable environmental protection laws and regulations implemented by agencies of the federal government and the state of New Mexico.

Washington Regulatory and Environmental Services (WRES)

2004-10-25T23:59:59.000Z

292

Building and Buildings, Scotland: Draft Building Standards (Scotland) Regulations, 1961  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

These regulations, made under the Building (Scotland) Act, 1959, prescribe standards for buildings for the purposes of Part II of that Act. The matters in relation to which standards have been prescribed are described in ...

Her Majesty's Stationary Office

1961-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

293

December 2007 Standards Forum and Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

The Standards Forum & Standards Actions Page 1 December 2007 The Standards Forum & Standards Actions Page 1 December 2007 Continued on next page Technical Standards Program Manager's Note 1 Teaching Standards Development- Inspiring the Next Generation 2 The EPA Radiation Standard for Spent-Fuel Storage in a Geological Repository 3 Expanded Access to Hydrogen Codes and Standards 4 Really Following the Building Code 6 Technical Standards Manager Spotlight 7

294

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Low Emission Vehicle Standards  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (EERE)

Low Emission Vehicle Low Emission Vehicle Standards to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Low Emission Vehicle Standards on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Low Emission Vehicle Standards on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Low Emission Vehicle Standards on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Low Emission Vehicle Standards on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Low Emission Vehicle Standards on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Low Emission Vehicle Standards on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Low Emission Vehicle Standards New vehicles sold or offered for sale in Vermont must meet California emissions and compliance requirements in Title 13 of the California Code of

295

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2006 Report  

SciTech Connect

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance program (EMAC), funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO), monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada Test Site (NTS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NTS biota. This report summarizes the program's activities conducted by National Security Technologies LLC (NSTec) during the Calendar Year 2006. Program activities included: (a) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (b) desert tortoise compliance, (c) ecosystem mapping and data management, (d) sensitive plant species monitoring, (e) sensitive and protected/regulated animal monitoring, (f) habitat monitoring, (g) habitat restoration monitoring, and (h) monitoring of the Nonproliferation Test and Evaluation Complex (NPTEC). Sensitive and protected/regulated species of the NTS include 44 plants, 1 mollusk, 2 reptiles, over 250 birds, and 26 mammals protected, managed, or considered sensitive as per state or federal regulations and natural resource agencies and organizations. The threatened desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) is the only species on the NTS protected under the Endangered Species Act. Biological surveys for the presence of sensitive and protected/regulated species and important biological resources on which they depend were conducted for 34 projects. A total of 342.1 hectares (ha) (845.37 acres [ac]) was surveyed for these projects. Sensitive and protected/regulated species and important biological resources found included: 2 inactive tortoise burrows, 2 western burrowing owls (Athene cunicularia hypugaea), several horses (Equus caballus), 2 active predator burrows, mature Joshua trees (Yucca brevifolia), yuccas and cacti; and also 1 bird nest (2 eggs), 1 barn owl (Tyto alba) and 2 great-horned owls (Bubo virginianus). NSTec provided a written summary report of all survey findings and mitigation recommendations, where applicable. All flagged burrows were avoided during construction activities. Twenty one of the 34 projects had sites within the distribution range of the threatened desert tortoise. NNSA/NSO must comply with the terms and conditions of a permit (called a Biological Opinion) from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) when conducting work in tortoise habitat. No tortoises were found in or displaced from project areas. No desert tortoises were accidentally injured or killed, nor were any captured or displaced from project sites. One desert tortoise was accidentally killed along a paved road. One site specific revegetation plan was submitted this year as required by the desert tortoise habitat revegetation plan approved in 2004. This year a total of 1.89 ha (4.69 ac) of tortoise habitat was disturbed. Revegetation of habitat at the Bren Tower burn was completed in the spring of 2006. In the summer of 2006, NSTec scientists prepared a Biological Assessment of the security activities that were being conducted at the Device Assembly Facility (DAF). NNSA requested a Biological Opinion from FWS in late 2006. Ecosystem mapping and data management in 2006 focused primarily on two tasks: (a) converting hardcopies of about 17 reports (EMAC annual reports and selected topical reports from 1996 to 2003) into electronic versions (Portable Document Format [PDF] files) to facilitate electronic document exchange, rapid retrieval, duplication, and printing, and (b) conducting an annual vegetation survey to determine wildland fire hazards on the NTS.

David C. Anderson; Paul D. Greger; Derek B. Hall; Dennis J. Hansen; William K. Ostler

2007-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

296

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2006 Report  

SciTech Connect

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance program (EMAC), funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO), monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada Test Site (NTS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NTS biota. This report summarizes the program's activities conducted by National Security Technologies LLC (NSTec) during the Calendar Year 2006. Program activities included: (a) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (b) desert tortoise compliance, (c) ecosystem mapping and data management, (d) sensitive plant species monitoring, (e) sensitive and protected/regulated animal monitoring, (f) habitat monitoring, (g) habitat restoration monitoring, and (h) monitoring of the Nonproliferation Test and Evaluation Complex (NPTEC). Sensitive and protected/regulated species of the NTS include 44 plants, 1 mollusk, 2 reptiles, over 250 birds, and 26 mammals protected, managed, or considered sensitive as per state or federal regulations and natural resource agencies and organizations. The threatened desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) is the only species on the NTS protected under the Endangered Species Act. Biological surveys for the presence of sensitive and protected/regulated species and important biological resources on which they depend were conducted for 34 projects. A total of 342.1 hectares (ha) (845.37 acres [ac]) was surveyed for these projects. Sensitive and protected/regulated species and important biological resources found included: 2 inactive tortoise burrows, 2 western burrowing owls (Athene cunicularia hypugaea), several horses (Equus caballus), 2 active predator burrows, mature Joshua trees (Yucca brevifolia), yuccas and cacti; and also 1 bird nest (2 eggs), 1 barn owl (Tyto alba) and 2 great-horned owls (Bubo virginianus). NSTec provided a written summary report of all survey findings and mitigation recommendations, where applicable. All flagged burrows were avoided during construction activities. Twenty one of the 34 projects had sites within the distribution range of the threatened desert tortoise. NNSA/NSO must comply with the terms and conditions of a permit (called a Biological Opinion) from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) when conducting work in tortoise habitat. No tortoises were found in or displaced from project areas. No desert tortoises were accidentally injured or killed, nor were any captured or displaced from project sites. One desert tortoise was accidentally killed along a paved road. One site specific re-vegetation plan was submitted this year as required by the desert tortoise habitat re-vegetation plan approved in 2004. This year a total of 1.89 ha (4.69 ac) of tortoise habitat was disturbed. Re-vegetation of habitat at the Bren Tower burn was completed in the spring of 2006. In the summer of 2006, NSTec scientists prepared a Biological Assessment of the security activities that were being conducted at the Device Assembly Facility (DAF). NNSA requested a Biological Opinion from FWS in late 2006. Ecosystem mapping and data management in 2006 focused primarily on two tasks: (a) converting hardcopies of about 17 reports (EMAC annual reports and selected topical reports from 1996 to 2003) into electronic versions (Portable Document Format [PDF] files) to facilitate electronic document exchange, rapid retrieval, duplication, and printing, and (b) conducting an annual vegetation survey to determine wildland fire hazards on the NTS. Copies of the PDF documents were sent to DOE's Office of Scientific and Technical Information website in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and the DOE National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Public Reading Facility.

David C. Anderson; Paul D. Greger; Derek B. Hall; Dennis J. Hansen; William K. Ostler

2007-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

297

Evaluating Residential Buildings for Statewide Compliance | Building Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Residential Buildings for Statewide Compliance Residential Buildings for Statewide Compliance The materials for this course may be used for in-person training courses, and are intended to provide the tools and specific training necessary to evaluate residential compliance with the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC). The course also provides useful training in general residential field inspection for energy code compliance. The recommended background for taking this course is significant experience and/or certification on the IECC in a plan review or inspection capacity. Presenters: Course materials originally published by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program, July 16, 2010. Course Type: Training Materials Video In-person Downloads: Presentation Slides Presentation Slides Presentation Slides and Windows Media Videos

298

Fleet Compliance Results for MY 2011/FY 2012 (Brochure)  

SciTech Connect

This annual report summarizes the compliance results of state and alternative fuel provider fleets covered by the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct) for model year 2011/fiscal year 2012.

Not Available

2013-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

299

Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance, Staff Directory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance, Staff Directory including phone number and areas of responsibility for the Energy and Waste Management Unit, Western Energy and Waste Management Unit, and the...

300

Preliminary Notice of Violation and Compliance Order, EA-1999...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

of Violation and Compliance Order, EA-1999-04 May 26, 1999 Issued to Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc., relating to events at the Spent Nuclear Fuels Project, K-Basins and other...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "ii compliance standards" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Environmental Compliance and Sustainability The College of William and Mary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Environmental Compliance and Sustainability The College of William and Mary Thomas. Thanks are also in order for Professor Sarah Stafford, The College of William nautical miles1 from San Francisco? How will Blueseed demonstrate sustainability

Lewis, Robert Michael

302

Knowledge discovery in corporate email : the compliance bot meets Enron  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

I propose the creation of a real-time compliance "bot" - software to momentarily pause each employee's email at the moment of sending and to electronically assess whether that email is likely to create liability or ...

Waterman, K. Krasnow

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

303

Carbon Compliance Acquisition 5 Limited | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Acquisition 5 Limited Jump to: navigation, search Name: Carbon Compliance Acquisition 5 Limited Place: Greater London, United Kingdom Zip: EC2M 2TD Sector: Carbon Product: This is...

304

Submitting Environmental Impact Statements | Compliance and Enforcement | US EPA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Submitting Environmental Impact Statements | Compliance and Enforcement | US EPA Submitting Environmental Impact Statements | Compliance and Enforcement | US EPA Jump to main content. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Recent Additions | Contact Us Search: All EPA Compliance and Enforcement q You are here: EPA Home q Compliance and Enforcement q National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) q Submitting Environmental Impact Statements Submitting Environmental Impact Statements q Amended EIS Filing System Guidelines (January 2011) q Where to Submit (or "File") an EIS q Filing an EIS--Draft, Final and Supplemental q EIS Filing Procedure for Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP) Events q Notice in the Federal Register q Time Periods Amended EIS Filing System Guidelines (January 2011)

305

May 2007 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Technical Standards in Revision 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Published 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 2

306

Compliance testing of Grissom AFB Central Heating Plant coal-fired boilers 3, 4, and 5, Grissom AFB, Indiana. Final report, 29 January-15 February 1989  

SciTech Connect

At the request of HQ, SAC/SGPB source compliance testing (particulate and visible emissions) of boilers 3, 4, and 5 in the Grissom AFB Central Heating Plant was accomplished 29 Jan-15 Feb 89. The survey was conducted to determine compliance with regards to Indiana Administrative Code, Title 325 - Air Pollution Control Board, Article 5, Opacity Regulations, and Article 6, Particulate Regulations. Boiler 3 was tested through scrubber B, Boiler 4 through scrubber A, and Boiler 5 through scrubber B and the bypass stack. Results indicate that each boiler met applicable visible and particulate emission standards.

Garrison, J.A.

1989-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

307

AT-400A compliance test report  

SciTech Connect

In 1993 Sandia was directed to design containers for the long-term storage and transport of nuclear weapons origin fissile material. This program was undertaken at the direction of the US Department of Energy and in cooperation with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Los Alamos National Laboratory. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Los Alamos National Laboratory were tasked with developing the internal fixturing for the contents. The hardware is being supplied by AlliedSignal Federal Manufacturing and Technologies, and the packaging process has been developed at Mason and Hanger Corporation`s Pantex Plant. The unique challenge was to design a container that could be sealed with the fissile material contents; and, anytime during the next 50 years, the container could be transported with only the need for the pre-shipment leak test. This required a rigorous design capable of meeting the long-term storage and transportation requirements. This report addresses the final testing that was undertaken to demonstrate compliance with US radioactive materials transport regulations.

Glass, R.E.

1998-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

308

DWPF waste form compliance plan (Draft Revision)  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy currently has over 100 million liters of high-level radioactive waste in storage at the Savannah River Site (SRS). In the late 1970`s, the Department of Energy recognized that there were significant safety and cost advantages associated with immobilizing the high-level waste in a stable solid form. Several alternative waste forms were evaluated in terms of product quality and reliability of fabrication. This evaluation led to a decision to build the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) at SRS to convert the easily dispersed liquid waste to borosilicate glass. In accordance with the NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) process, an Environmental Impact Statement was prepared for the facility, as well as an Environmental Assessment of the alternative waste forms, and issuance of a Record of Decision (in December, 1982) on the waste form. The Department of Energy, recognizing that start-up of the DWPF would considerably precede licensing of a repository, instituted a Waste Acceptance Process to ensure that these canistered waste forms would be acceptable for eventual disposal at a federal repository. This report is a revision of the DWPF compliance plan.

Plodinec, M.J.; Marra, S.L.

1991-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

309

DWPF waste form compliance plan (Draft Revision)  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy currently has over 100 million liters of high-level radioactive waste in storage at the Savannah River Site (SRS). In the late 1970's, the Department of Energy recognized that there were significant safety and cost advantages associated with immobilizing the high-level waste in a stable solid form. Several alternative waste forms were evaluated in terms of product quality and reliability of fabrication. This evaluation led to a decision to build the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) at SRS to convert the easily dispersed liquid waste to borosilicate glass. In accordance with the NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) process, an Environmental Impact Statement was prepared for the facility, as well as an Environmental Assessment of the alternative waste forms, and issuance of a Record of Decision (in December, 1982) on the waste form. The Department of Energy, recognizing that start-up of the DWPF would considerably precede licensing of a repository, instituted a Waste Acceptance Process to ensure that these canistered waste forms would be acceptable for eventual disposal at a federal repository. This report is a revision of the DWPF compliance plan.

Plodinec, M.J.; Marra, S.L.

1991-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

310

Measuring Hedge Effectiveness for FAS 133 Compliance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) 133 requires business entities to document their anticipation of hedge effectiveness in order to qualify for hedge accounting treatment of gains and losses from financial derivatives. ...

Charnes, John M.; Koch, Paul D.; Berkman, John

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

311

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE NPDES STORM WATER COMPLIANCE ALTERNATIVES AT THE SRS  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) prepared this environmental assessment (EA) to evaluate the potential environmental impacts associated with proposed and alternative actions to achieve water quality permit compliance at 38 storm water outfalls located at the Savannah River Site (SRS) (Figure 1-1). Effluent monitoring data indicates that some of these outfalls may not presently comply with new National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Storm Water General Permit effluent standards that became effective July 1, 2005 (SCR000000). The NPDES permit requires that best management practices (BMPs) be implemented and maintained, as necessary, to ensure that storm water discharges at SRS do not cause or contribute to the contravention of applicable state water quality standards (WQS).

Shedrow, C

2006-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

312

Performance assessment for the class L-II disposal facility  

SciTech Connect

This draft radiological performance assessment (PA) for the proposed Class L-II Disposal Facility (CIIDF) on the Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) has been prepared to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of the US Department of Energy Order 5820.2A. This PA considers the disposal of low-level radioactive wastes (LLW) over the operating life of the facility and the long-term performance of the facility in providing protection to public health and the environment. The performance objectives contained in the order require that the facility be managed to accomplish the following: (1) Protect public health and safety in accordance with standards specified in environmental health orders and other DOE orders. (2) Ensure that external exposure to the waste and concentrations of radioactive material that may be released into surface water, groundwater, soil, plants, and animals results in an effective dose equivalent (EDE) that does not exceed 25 mrem/year to a member of the public. Releases to the atmosphere shall meet the requirements of 40 CFR Pt. 61. Reasonable effort should be made to maintain releases of radioactivity in effluents to the general environment as low as reasonably achievable. (1) Ensure that the committed EDEs received by individual who inadvertently may intrude into the facility after the loss of active institutional control (100 years) will not exceed 100 mrem/year for continuous exposure of 500 mrem for a single acute exposure. (4) Protect groundwater resources, consistent with federal, state, and local requirements.

NONE

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

313

Radiation Protection Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MEASUREMENT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1174-2013 November 2013 DOE STANDARD RADIATION PROTECTION FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1174-2013 This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Website at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ ii ii DOE-STD-1174-2013 INTENTIONALLY BLANK iv DOE-STD-1174-2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPROVAL.....................................................................................................................................iii TABLE OF CONTENTS...................................................................................................................v

314

Enforcing Energy-Efficiency Standards | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enforcing Energy-Efficiency Standards Enforcing Energy-Efficiency Standards Enforcing Energy-Efficiency Standards September 13, 2010 - 4:37pm Addthis Scott Blake Harris Former General Counsel What does this mean for me? The Department sets energy efficiency standards for a vast array of consumer and commercial products. The Department had never systematically enforced DOE's 35-year-old energy efficiency standard. Over the past year, we have thus moved quickly and decisively to end that situation. From now on, compliance with all aspects of DOE energy efficiency standards will be expected, and those standards will be enforced. Secretary of Energy Steven Chu has said that when it comes to remediating climate change and promoting energy independence, improved energy efficiency is not just low-hanging fruit-it's fruit lying on the

315

Regulatory issues for Waste Isolation Pilot Plant long-term compliance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR 191B and 268  

SciTech Connect

Before disposing of transuranic radioactive waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), the United States Department of Energy (DOE) must evaluate compliance with long-term regulations of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), specifically the Environmental Standards for the Management and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level and Transuranic Radioactive Wastes (40 CFR 191), and the Land Disposal Restrictions (40 CFR 268) of the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) is conducting iterative performance assessments (PAs) of the WIPP for the DOE to provide interim guidance while preparing for final compliance evaluations. This paper provides background information on the regulations, describes the SNL WIPP PA Departments approach to developing a defensible technical basis for consistent compliance evaluations, and summarizes the major observations and conclusions drawn from the 1991 and 1992 PAs.

Anderson, D.R.; Marietta, M.G. [Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States); Higgins, P.J. Jr. [USDOE Albuquerque Field Office, NM (United States). Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Project Integration Office

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

316

Cost Accounting Standards Board Disclosure Statement (Form DS-2)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Cost Accounting Standards Board Disclosure Statement (Form DS-2) University of California, Irvine Revision Number 2, Effective Date April 1, 2012 #12;i COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND CERTIFICATION C-1 Part I General Information I-1 Part II Direct Costs II-1 Part III Indirect Costs III-1 Part IV

Loudon, Catherine

317

Compliance Certification Enforcement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April 22, 2011 April 22, 2011 Topstar: Proposed Penalty (2011-CE-2703) DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Topstar International, Inc. failed to certify a variety of incandescent reflector lamps as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards. April 22, 2011 Living Direct: Proposed Penalty (2011-CE-1904) DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Living Direct, Inc. failed to certify a variety of dishwashers, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards. April 22, 2011 Midea Washing Appliance: Proposed Penalty (2011-CE-1903) DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Midea Washing Appliances Mfg. Co., Ltd. failed to certify a variety of dishwashers as compliant with the applicable water and energy conservation standards.

318

Compliance Certification Enforcement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 6, 2010 October 6, 2010 Averen: Order (2010-CW-0711) DOE ordered Averen, Inc. to pay a $5,000 civil penalty after finding Averen had failed to certify that certain models of faucets comply with the applicable water conservation standards. October 5, 2010 American Power: Order (2010-CE-0911) DOE issued an Order and entered into a Compromise Agreement with American Power Solutions, Inc. for failure to certify that general service flurorescent lamp model T8 complies with the energy conservation standards. October 5, 2010 Felix Storch: Order (2010-CE-03/04/0613) DOE ordered Felix Storch, Inc. to pay a $5,000 civil penalty after finding Felix Storch had failed to certify that basic model DW 2432, a dishwasher, complies with the applicable energy conservation standards.

319

1 Direct Cost Finding Interim Compliance Testing  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of Sponsor Review Desk Review Site Visit Audit Agreed Upon Procedures Review #12;Audit Process Flow Planning & Definition Fieldwork & Testing Results & Reporting Closeout & Corrective Action Plan 5 REQUEST #12;Common · Preparation is key!! · Be cooperative · Documentation Standard Vary ­ Keep best documentation you can #12

320

TAP Webinar: Davis-Bacon Act Compliance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This TAP webinar held on Nov. 18, 2014 from 1:00 p.m. - 3:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. It will offer information for Energy Department grantees, sub-grantees, and their contractors on complying with Davis-Bacon Act requirements.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "ii compliance standards" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

March 2007 Standards Forum and Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 2007 March 2007 Continued on next page TSP Manager's Notes 1 Domestic Programs (American National Standards) Overview 2 Aerospace Industry Advocates Standards Selection Based on Technical Merit, Not Semantics 3 Report Recommends Withdrawal of OMB Risk Assessment Bulletin 4 Technical Standards Manager Spotlight 5 Topical Committee Developments 6 Welcome Aboard the TSMC! 7 Standards Actions 8 DOE Standards Actions 8

322

Glossary of Screen Labels for PARS II V1 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Glossary of Screen Labels for PARS II V1 More Documents & Publications PARS II Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) PARSIISOP.pdf Proposed Data Elements for PARS II Web Application...

323

The Costs and Benefits of Compliance with Renewable Portfolio Standards: Reviewing Experience to Date  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

to $92 Million in Solar Rebates. St. Louis Post-Dispatch.agrees-to-million-in-solar- rebates/article_3a39257d-3607-annualization. upfront solar rebate to procure supply to

Heeter, Jenny

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

324

The Costs and Benefits of Compliance with Renewable Portfolio Standards: Reviewing Experience to Date  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

based on day-ahead CAISO energy market prices and the costthe Midwest regional energy market (PSCW 2012). DISCLAIMERprices in regional energy markets, associated with low

Heeter, Jenny

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

325

The Costs and Benefits of Compliance with Renewable Portfolio Standards: Reviewing Experience to Date  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

geothermal, biomass, small hydro); one or more secondaryClass IV for existing small hydro. Although the state has$33.8 (Class IV-Existing Small Hydro) $50 (Tier I and Tier

Heeter, Jenny

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

326

The Costs and Benefits of Compliance with Renewable Portfolio Standards: Reviewing Experience to Date  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Mexico Public Regulatory Commission; Will Lent and Rick Umoff, Solarsolar renewable additions caused revenue At the opposite end are Arizona, Colorado, and New Mexico,Mexico, where rules specify that cost cap calculations shall not include annualization. upfront solar

Heeter, Jenny

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

327

The Costs and Benefits of Compliance with Renewable Portfolio Standards: Reviewing Experience to Date  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of the 9.2 /kWh retail electricity cost in 2012 across theof total retail electricity costs. Again, comparabilityprojected increase in electricity costs to meet a 33% RPS in

Heeter, Jenny

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

328

Compliance and Verification of Standards and Labeling Programs in China: Lessons Learned  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

covering two products (refrigerators and air conditioners),and unitary air conditioners) and 15 other products areprogram by products and location room air conditioners Fix

Saheb, Yamina

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

329

Labor Standards Compliance, Contractor Labor Relations, and Contractor Workforce Restructuring Programs (For Informational Purposes Only)  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This draft has been scheduled for final review before the Directives Review Board on 07/17/14. All major comments and concerns should be provided to your DRB representative, following your organization process. If you do not know who your representative is, please see the list of DRB members. If your office is represented by Ingrid Kolb, Director, Office of Management, please submit your major concerns and comments to the DRB Liaison, Camille Beben (Camille.Beben@hq.doe.gov; 202-586-1014). All major comments and concerns should be submitted by COB 07/16/2014.

2014-07-09T23:59:59.000Z

330

The Costs and Benefits of Compliance with Renewable Portfolio Standards: Reviewing Experience to Date  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.021 Xcel Energy. (2011). Renewable1). Stanfield. J. (2013b). Xcel Energy Finds Wind PricesRPS incremental costs. Xcel Energy (MN) examined the cost of

Heeter, Jenny

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

331

The Costs and Benefits of Compliance with Renewable Portfolio Standards: Reviewing Experience to Date  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

have relied primarily on wind power to meet general RPSreductions. Because wind power does not have fuel costsitXcel has been able to buy wind power through PPAs at prices

Heeter, Jenny

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

332

Renewable portfolio standards in the USA: experience and compliance with targets.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

??Economic growth requires growth of energy consumption. In the second half of the twentieth century energy consumption began to outgrow its production and the United (more)

Bespalova, Olga Gennadyevna

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

333

The Costs and Benefits of Compliance with Renewable Portfolio Standards: Reviewing Experience to Date  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Illinois, Massachusetts, Maine, New Jersey (non-solar), andin Massachusetts that are ineligible for that states solarMassachusetts announced in 2013 that it would expand its solar

Heeter, Jenny

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

334

The Costs and Benefits of Compliance with Renewable Portfolio Standards: Reviewing Experience to Date  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

existing biomass and landfill gas and Class IV for existingRPS-eligible resources. Landfill gas and wood waste are the

Heeter, Jenny

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

335

Compliance and Verification of Standards and Labelling Programs in China: Lessons Learned  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

for household refrigerators/ freezers and room airZhou et al 2008] Refrigerators Freezers Air conditionersZhou et al 2008] Refrigerators Freezers Air conditioners

Saheb, Yamina

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

336

Compliance and Verification of Standards and Labeling Programs in China: Lessons Learned  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

for household refrigerators/ freezers and room airZhou et al 2008] Refrigerators Freezers Air conditionersZhou et al 2008] Refrigerators Freezers Air conditioners

Saheb, Yamina

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

337

The Costs and Benefits of Compliance with Renewable Portfolio Standards: Reviewing Experience to Date  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

resources including energy efficiency measures by 2021. A solarresources by 2018.The overall target for renewable energy includes technology-specific targets of 0.2% solarresources. Of that 12.5%, 0.5% must come from solar energy.

Heeter, Jenny

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

338

The Costs and Benefits of Compliance with Renewable Portfolio Standards: Reviewing Experience to Date  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Power. (2011). Renewable Energy Cost Impact Report. Power. (2011). Renewable Energy Cost Impact Report. Services. (2011). Renewable Energy Cost Impact Report.

Heeter, Jenny

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

339

The Costs and Benefits of Compliance with Renewable Portfolio Standards: Reviewing Experience to Date  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

2011). Renewable Energy Cost Impact Report. Minnesota2011). Renewable Energy Cost Impact Report. Minnesota2011). Renewable Energy Cost Impact Report. Minnesota

Heeter, Jenny

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

340

The Costs and Benefits of Compliance with Renewable Portfolio Standards: Reviewing Experience to Date  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

have relied primarily on wind power to meet general RPSpower to leads. One assessment of the costs of transmission for wind

Heeter, Jenny

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "ii compliance standards" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Compliance status report for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for the disposition of transuranic (TRU) waste generated through national defense-related activities. Approximately 53,700 m{sup 2} of these wastes have been generated and are currently stored at government defense installations across the country. The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), located in southeastern New Mexico, has been sited and constructed to meet the criteria established by the scientific and regulatory community for the safe, long-term disposal of TRU and TRU-mixed wastes. This Compliance Status Report (CSR) provides an assessment of the progress of the WIPP Program toward compliance with long-term disposal regulations, set forth in Title 40 CFR 191 (EPA, 1993a), Subparts B and C, and Title 40 CFR {section}268.6 (EPA, 1993b), in order to focus on-going and future experimental and engineering activities. The CSR attempts to identify issues associated with the performance of the WIPP as a long-term repository and to focus on the resolution of these issues. This report will serve as a tool to focus project resources on the areas necessary to ensure complete, accurate, and timely submittal of the compliance application. This document is not intended to constitute a statement of compliance or a demonstration of compliance.

Not Available

1994-03-31T23:59:59.000Z

342

Technical Standards, GENII- Gap Analsis - May 3, 2004 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Standards, GENII- Gap Analsis - May 3, 2004 Technical Standards, GENII- Gap Analsis - May 3, 2004 Technical Standards, GENII- Gap Analsis - May 3, 2004 May 3, 2004 Software Quality Assurance Improvement Plan: GENII Gap Analysis The GENII software, for radiological dispersion and consequence analysis, is one of the codes designated for the toolbox. To determine the actions needed to bring the GENII code into compliance with the SQA qualification criteria, and develop an estimate of the resources required to perform the upgrade, the Implementation Plan has committed to sponsoring a code-specific gap analysis document. Technical Standards, GENII- Gap Analsis More Documents & Publications Guidance on GENII computer code - July 6, 2004 Technical Standards, ALOHA-Gap Analysis - May 3, 2004 Technical Standards, MELCOR - Gap Analysis - May 3

343

September 2004 Standards Forum and Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

16 Cancellation in Progress - 3 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http:tis.eh.doe.govtechstds September 2004 The Standards Forum and...

344

Compliance Certification Enforcement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 19, 2013 March 19, 2013 Avanti: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-2105) DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Avanti Products, LLC, failed to certify a variety of residential clothes dryers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards. March 18, 2013 General Restaurant Equipment: Order (2013-CE-5344) DOE ordered General Restaurant Equipment Co. to pay a $8,000 civil penalty after finding General Restaurant Equipment had failed to certify that certain models of walk-in cooler and freezer components comply with the applicable energy conservation standards. March 18, 2013 Commercial Display Systems: Order (2013-CE-5350) DOE ordered Commercial Display Systems, LLC to pay a $8,000 civil penalty after finding Commercial Display Systems had failed to certify that any

345

Compliance Certification Enforcement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 7, 2012 November 7, 2012 YMGI: Order (2011-SCE-1605) DOE ordered YMGI Group LLC to pay a $31,400 civil penalty after finding (1) YMGI had failed to certify that certain models of residential central air conditioners comply with the applicable energy conservation standards and (2) YMGI had distributed in commerce model TTWC-18K-31B, a through-the-wall air conditioner that does not meet the applicable energy conservation standard. October 11, 2012 YMGI: Proposed Penalty (2011-SCE-1605) DOE issued a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty to YMGI Group, LLC, alleging YMGI (1) distributed in commerce noncompliant through-the-wall split system central air conditioner model TTWC-18K-31B; and (2) distributed in commerce residential central air conditioners without first certifying the models to

346

Compliance Certification Enforcement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 9, 2012 July 9, 2012 MC Appliance: Proposed Penalty (2012-CE-1508) DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that CNA International Inc. d/b/a MC Appliance Corporation failed to certify a variety of room air conditioners as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards. July 9, 2012 Danby Products: Proposed Penalty (2012-CE-1415) DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Danby Products, Inc. failed to certify refrigerators and freezers as compliant with the energy conservation standards. July 9, 2012 Goodman: Proposed Penalty (2012-CE-1509) DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Goodman Manufacturing Company, L.P., failed to certify a various room air conditioners as compliant with the applicable energy conservation

347

Compliance Certification Enforcement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 21, 2013 February 21, 2013 Commercial Display Systems: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5350) DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Commercial Display Systems, LLC failed to certify a variety of walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards. February 21, 2013 Jamison Door: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5348) DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Jamison Door Company failed to certify a variety of walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards. February 21, 2013 Golden Cooler: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5345) DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Golden Cooler failed to certify a variety of walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant

348

Compliance Certification Enforcement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April 26, 2010 April 26, 2010 EZ-FLO International: Order (2010-CW-1401) DOE ordered EZ-FLO International, Inc. to pay a $20,000 civil penalty after finding EZ-FLO had failed to certify that certain models of showerhead comply with the applicable water conservation standard. April 26, 2010 Zoe Industries: Order (2010-CW-1405) DOE ordered Zoe Industries, Inc. to pay a $5,000 civil penalty after finding Zoe had failed to certify that certain models of showerheads comply with the applicable water conservation standards. April 21, 2010 Watermark Designs: Order (2010-CW-1404) DOE ordered Watermark Designs Holdings, Ltd. d/b/a Watermark Designs, Ltd. to pay a $135,104 civil penalty after finding Watermark Designs had failed to certify that various models of showerheads comply with the applicable

349

Standards Development and Deployment of a Comprehensive, Integrated, Open-standard Monitoring and Equipment Control Networking Protocol Infrastructure for Effective Facility Energy Management of a Large-scale Industrial Site in Alberta, Canada  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

: Implement control networking interoperability standards Enforce standards compliance Work with vendors to deliver more cost effective solutions Develop Suncor specific LonMark equipment profiles ESL-IE-14-05-27 Proceedings of the Thrity..., ISO, ANSI/CEA, LONMARK ISO 14908 and ANSI/CEA 709.1 Standards - Local Operating Network (LON) for Building Automation Control Systems Large certified product availability Worldwide standard, worldwide support Well defined interoperability...

Bernstein, R.

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

350

Interaction of Compliance and Voluntary Renewable Energy Markets  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Interaction of Compliance Interaction of Compliance and Voluntary Renewable Energy Markets Lori Bird and Elizabeth Lokey Technical Report NREL/ TP-670-42096 October 2007 NREL is operated by Midwest Research Institute ● Battelle Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 * www.nrel.gov Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by Midwest Research Institute * Battelle Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 Technical Report NREL/ TP-670-42096 October 2007 Interaction of Compliance and Voluntary Renewable Energy Markets Lori Bird and Elizabeth Lokey Prepared under Task No. IGST.7330 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government.

351

General Atomics Compliance Order, October 6, 1995 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

General Atomics General Atomics Agreement Name General Atomics Compliance Order, October 6, 1995 HWCA 95/96-017 State California Agreement Type Compliance Agreement Legal Driver(s) FFCAct Scope Summary Address LDR requirements pertaining to storage and treatment of covered waste at General Atomics Parties DOE; State of California Environmental Protection Agency (Department of Toxic Substances Control) Date 10/6/1995 SCOPE * Address LDR requirements pertaining to storage and treatment of covered waste at General Atomics. * Require adherence to the Site Treatment Plan which provides overall schedules for achieving compliance with LDR storage and treatment requirements based on milestones. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * Respondent shall carry out all activities in accordance with the schedules and

352

Oak Ridge Reservation Compliance Order, September 26, 1995 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oak Ridge Reservation Compliance Order, September Oak Ridge Reservation Compliance Order, September 26, 1995 State Tennessee Agreement Type Compliance Order Legal Driver(s) FFCAct Scope Summary Enforce the Plan and ensure that the Respondent completes all work in accordance with the schedules contained in, and/or developed pursuant to, the Plan Parties DOE; Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Date 9/26/1995 SCOPE * Approve, with modifications made by TDEC, the "Proposed Site Treatment Plan for the Oak Ridge Reservation," hereafter known as the Plan. * Enforce the Plan and ensure that the Respondent completes all work in accordance with the schedules contained in, and/or developed pursuant to, the Plan. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * Schedules are contained in the Plan.

353

ACE Learning Series - Compliance Toolkit | Building Energy Codes Program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Compliance Toolkit Compliance Toolkit The compliance toolkit describes the steps that should be taken by the build community to make sure that their buildings meet the requirements of the energy codes in effect where the buildings are being built and that the building designs are well documented so that the enforcement community can quickly and easily determine if the building meets the requirement of the energy code. This toolkit describes the steps that should be taken by the build community to make sure that their buildings meet the requirements of the energy codes in effect where the buildings are being built and that the building designs are well documented so that the enforcement community can quickly and easily determine if the building meets the requirement of the

354

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Compliance Order, October 6, 1995 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley National Laboratory Agreement Name Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Compliance Order, October 6, 1995 HWCA # 95/96-016 State California Agreement Type Compliance Agreement Legal Driver(s) FFCAct Scope Summary Address LDR requirements pertaining to storage and treatment of covered waste at LBNL Parties DOE; State of California Environmental Protection Agency (Department of Toxic Substances Control) Date 10/6/1995 SCOPE * Address LDR requirements pertaining to storage and treatment of covered waste at LBNL. * Require adherence to the Site Treatment Plan which provides overall schedules for achieving compliance with LDR storage and treatment requirements based on milestones. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * Respondent shall carry out all activities in accordance with the schedules and

355

Contacts for NEPA Policy and Compliance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Us » Contact Us » Contacts for NEPA Policy and Compliance Us » Contact Us » Contacts for NEPA Policy and Compliance Contacts for NEPA Policy and Compliance Carol Borgstrom, Director 202-586-4600 carol.borgstrom@hq.doe.gov Lettie Wormley, Secretary 202-586-4610 lettie.wormley@hq.doe.gov Eric Cohen, Supervisory Environmental Protection Specialist 202-586-7684 eric.cohen@hq.doe.gov Brian Costner, Supervisory Environmental Protection Specialist 202-586-9924 brian.costner@hq.doe.gov James (Jim) Daniel, Supervisory Environmental Protection Specialist 202-586-9760 daniel.james@hq.doe.gov Ralph Barr, Environmental Protection Specialist 202-586-3448 ralph.barr@hq.doe.gov Vivian Bowie, Environmental Protection Specialist 202-586-1771 vivian.bowie@hq.doe.gov Connie Chen, Environmental Protection Specialist 202-586-0733 connie.chen@hq.doe.gov

356

OFFICE OF NEPA POLICY AND COMPLIANCE - STAFF DIRECTORY | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OFFICE OF NEPA POLICY AND COMPLIANCE - STAFF DIRECTORY OFFICE OF NEPA POLICY AND COMPLIANCE - STAFF DIRECTORY OFFICE OF NEPA POLICY AND COMPLIANCE - STAFF DIRECTORY Carol Borgstrom, Director 202-586-4600 Carol.Borgstrom@hq.doe.gov Lettie Wormley, Secretary 202-586-4610 Lettie.Wormley@hq.doe.gov Eastern Energy and Waste Management Unit Contact Program/Responsibility Special Projects or Topics Brian Costner Brian.Costner@hq.doe.gov 202-586-9924 Unit Leader Yardena Mansoor Yardena.Mansoor@hq.doe.gov 202-586-9326 Office of Environmental Management * Oak Ridge Office * Savannah River Operations Office Office of Fossil Energy * Strategic Reserves * Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability * Champlain Hudson Power Express Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration

357

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance Guide, Sandia National Laboratories  

SciTech Connect

This report contains a comprehensive National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance Guide for the Sandia National Laboratories. It is based on the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) NEPA regulations in 40 CFR Parts 1500 through 1508; the US Department of Energy (DOE) N-EPA implementing procedures in 10 CFR Part 102 1; DOE Order 5440.1E; the DOE ``Secretarial Policy Statement on the National Environmental Policy Act`` of June 1994- Sandia NEPA compliance procedures-, and other CEQ and DOE guidance. The Guide includes step-by-step procedures for preparation of Environmental Checklists/Action Descriptions Memoranda (ECL/ADMs), Environmental Assessments (EAs), and Environmental Impact Statements (EISs). It also includes sections on ``Dealing With NEPA Documentation Problems`` and ``Special N-EPA Compliance Issues.``

Hansen, R.P. [Hansen Environmental Consultants, Englewood, CO (United States)

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

358

Compliance agreements at the INEL: A success story  

SciTech Connect

The Radioactive Waste Management Complex (RWMC), located at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL), is the storage facility for approximately 135,000 containers of radioactive mixed waste that must be stored in accordance with Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) requirements. Collectively, the compliance and safety basis documents governing the operation of the storage facility contain approximately 2,500 specific, identifiable requirements. Critical to the compliance with these 2,500 requirements was the development of a process which converted these requirements to a form and format that allowed implementation at the operator level. Additionally, to ensure continued compliance, a method of identifying and controlling implementing documents is imperative. This paper discusses the methods employed to identify, implement, and control these requirements.

McBath, W.H.

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

359

Learning & Development Policy/Compliance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Learning & Development Policy/Compliance Learning & Development Policy/Compliance Learning & Development Policy/Compliance Searching for information on Department and Federal training policy and guidelines? The following websites can be of help: DOE Learning & Development Training Policies and Guidelines On the DOE Directives page you will find the following information: DOE O360.1b Federal Employee Training Order DOE M360.1-1B Federal Employee Training Manual DOE O361.1B Acquisition Career Management Program Office of Personnel Management Federal Government Training Policies and Guidelines Training and Development Policy Training Policy Handbook Training, however, is a program, not just a set of authorities, and works within a context that includes Federal procurement authorities, personnel

360

A dynamic viscoelastic contact problem with normal compliance, finite penetration and nonmonotone slip rate dependent friction  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract We consider a mathematical model which describes the dynamic evolution of a viscoelastic body in frictional contact with an obstacle. The contact is modelled with normal compliance and unilateral constraint, associated to a rate slip-dependent version of Coulombs law of dry friction. In order to approximate the contact conditions, we consider a regularized problem wherein the contact is modelled by a standard normal compliance condition without finite penetrations. For each problem, we derive a variational formulation and an existence result of the weak solution of the regularized problem is obtained. Next, we prove the convergence of the weak solution of the regularized problem to the weak solution of the initial nonregularized problem. Then, we introduce a fully discrete approximation of the variational problem based on a finite element method and on a second order time integration scheme. The solution of the resulting nonsmooth and nonconvex frictional contact problems is presented, based on approximation by a sequence of nonsmooth convex programming problems. Finally, some numerical simulations are provided in order to illustrate both the behaviour of the solution related to the frictional contact conditions and the convergence result.

Mikel Barboteu; Krzysztof Bartosz; Piotr Kalita

2015-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "ii compliance standards" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Biennial Environmental Compliance Report  

SciTech Connect

This Biennial Environmental Compliance Report (BECR) documents environmental regulatory compliance at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), a facility designed for the safe disposal of transuranic (TRU) radioactive waste, for the reporting period of April 1, 1998, to March 31, 2000. As required by the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act (LWA)(Public Law [Pub. L.] 102-579, and amended by Pub. L. 104-201), the BECR documents U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Carlsbad Area Office's (hereinafter the ''CAO'') compliance with applicable environmental protection laws and regulations implemented by agencies of the federal government and the state of New Mexico. An issue was identified in the 1998 BECR relating to a potential cross-connection between the fire-water systems and the site domestic water system. While the CAO and its managing and operating contractor (hereinafter the ''MOC'') believe the site was always in compliance with cross-connection control requirements, hardware and procedural upgrades w ere implemented in March 1999 to strengthen its compliance posture. Further discussion of this issue is presented in section 30.2.2 herein. During this reporting period WIPP received two letters and a compliance order alleging violation of certain requirements outlined in section 9(a)(1) of the LWA. With the exception of one item, pending a final decision by the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED), all alleged violations have been resolved without the assessment of fines or penalties. Non-mixed TRU waste shipments began on March 26, 1999. Shipments continued through November 26, 1999, the effective date of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Hazardous Waste Facility Permit (NM4890139088-TSDF). No shipments regulated under the Hazardous Waste Facility Permit were received at WIPP during this BECR reporting period.

Westinghouse TRU Solutions

2000-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

362

May 2006 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standards Actions 1 Standards Actions 1 New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Published 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2

363

Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Program (Mississippi) Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Program (Mississippi) < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Developer Fed. Government Fuel Distributor General Public/Consumer Industrial Installer/Contractor Institutional Investor-Owned Utility Local Government Low-Income Residential Multi-Family Residential Municipal/Public Utility Nonprofit Residential Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative Schools State/Provincial Govt Systems Integrator Transportation Tribal Government Utility Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State

364

The waste isolation pilot plant regulatory compliance program  

SciTech Connect

The passage of the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act of 1992 (LWA) marked a turning point for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) program. It established a Congressional mandate to open the WIPP in as short a time as possible, thereby initiating the process of addressing this nation`s transuranic (TRU) waste problem. The DOE responded to the LWA by shifting the priority at the WIPP from scientific investigations to regulatory compliance and the completion of prerequisites for the initiation of operations. Regulatory compliance activities have taken four main focuses: (1) preparing regulatory submittals; (2) aggressive schedules; (3) regulator interface; and (4) public interactions

Mewhinney, J.A. [U.S. Dept. of Energy, Carlsbad, NM (United States); Kehrman, R.F. [Westinghouse Electric Corp., Carlsbad, NM (United States)

1996-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

365

TRUPACT-II Operating and Maintenance Instructions  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this document is to provide the technical requirements for preparation for use, operation, inspection, and maintenance of a Transuranic Package Transporter Model II (TRUPACT-II) Shipping Package and directly related components. This document complies with the minimum requirements as specified in the TRUPACT-II Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP) and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Certificate of Compliance (C of C) 9218. In the event there is a conflict between this document and the TRUPACT-II SARP, the TRUPACT-II SARP shall govern. TRUPACT-II C of C number 9218 states, ''... each package must be prepared for shipment and operated in accordance with the procedures described in Chapter 7.0, Operating Procedures, of the application.'' It further states, ''... each package must be tested and maintained in accordance with the procedures described in Chapter 8.0, Acceptance Tests and Maintenance Program of the application.'' Chapter 9 of the TRUPACT-II SARP charges the Westinghouse Electric Corporation Waste Isolation Division (WID) with assuring that the TRUPACT-II is used in accordance with the requirements of the C of C. To meet this requirement and verify consistency of operations when loading and unloading the TRUPACT-II on the trailer, placing a payload in the packaging, unloading the payload from the packaging, or performing maintenance, the U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Area Office (U.S. DOE/CAO) finds it necessary to implement the changes that follow. This TRUPACT-II maintenance document represents a change to previous philosophy regarding site specific procedures for the use of the TRUPACT-II. This document details the instructions to be followed to consistently operate and maintain the TRUPACT-II. The intent of these instructions is to ensure that all users of the TRUPACT-II follow the same or equivalent instructions. Users may achieve this intent by any of the following methods: (1) Utilizing these instructions as is, or (2) Attaching a site-specific cover page/letter to this document stating that these are the instructions to be used at their location, or (3) Sites may prepare their own document using the steps in this document word-for-word, in-sequence, including Notes and Cautions. Site specific information may be included as deemed necessary. Submit the document to WID National TRU Programs for approval. Any revision made subsequent to WID TRU Program's approval shall be reviewed and approved by WID TRU Programs. A copy of the approval letter from WID National TRU Programs should be available for audit purposes. Users shall develop site-specific procedures addressing leak testing, preoperational activities, quality assurance, hoisting and rigging, and radiation health physics to be used in conjunction with the instructions contained in this document. Users desiring to recommend changes to this document may submit their recommendations to the WID National TRU Programs for evaluation. If approved, the change(s) will be incorporated into this document for use by all TRUPACT-II users. User sites will be audited to this document to ensure compliance within one year from the effective date of this revision. This document discusses operating instructions, required inspections and maintenance for the following: TRUPACT-II packaging, and Miscellaneous packaging, special tools, and equipment. Packaging and payload handling equipment and transport trailers have been specifically designed for use with the TRUPACT-II Packaging. This document discusses the required instructions for use of the following equipment in conjunction with the TRUPACT-II Packaging: TRUPACT-II Mobile Loading Unit (MLU), Adjustable Center-of-Gravity Lift Fixture (ACGLF), and TRUPACT-II Transport Trailer. Attachment E contains the various TRUPACT-II packaging interface control drawings, leak-test and vent-port tool drawings, ACGLF drawings, and tie-down drawings that identify the various system components.

Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Waste Isolation Division

1999-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

366

September 2006 Standards Forum/Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 2006 September 2006 TSP Manager's Notes 1 TEN YEARS AFTER THE NTTAA: 1996-2006 2 Committee on Nuclear Fuel Cycle Approves Two New Standards 4 Renewable Portfolio Standards Help Wind Industry to Sail 5 Technical Standards Manager Spotlight 5 World Standards Day 2006 in

367

Photosystem II  

ScienceCinema (OSTI)

James Barber, Ernst Chain Professor of Biochemistry at Imperial College, London, gives a BSA Distinguished Lecture titled, "The Structure and Function of Photosystem II: The Water-Splitting Enzyme of Photosynthesis."

James Barber

2010-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

368

Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research Compliance Order, October 6, 1995  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Energy-Related Health Research (LEHR) Compliance Order, October 6, 1.. Page 1 of 11 for Energy-Related Health Research (LEHR) Compliance Order, October 6, 1.. Page 1 of 11 EM Home | Regulatory Compliance | Environmental Compliance Agreements Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research (LEHR) Compliance Order, October 6, 1995 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL _________________________________ In the Matter of: LABORATORY FOR ENERGY-RELATED HEALTH RESEARCH (LEHR). HWCA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, Respondent. ) ) ) COMPLIANCE ORDER ) 95/96 -020 ) ) ) ) _________________________________) FEDERAL FACILITY COMPLIANCE ACT ORDER FOR THE LABORATORY FOR ENERGY-RELATED HEALTH RESEARCH (LEHR) This Order is issued by the California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) to require compliance by the United States Department of Energy (DOE)

369

Estimation of fracture compliance from tubewaves generated at a fracture intersecting a borehole  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Understanding fracture compliance is important for characterizing fracture networks and for inferring fluid flow in the subsurface. In an attempt to estimate fracture compliance in the field, we developed a new model to ...

Bakku, Sudhish Kumar

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

370

FEDERAL INFORMATION PROCESSING STANDARD  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

March 2004 FEDERAL INFORMATION PROCESSING STANDARD (FIPS) 199, STANDARDS FOR SECURITY Information Technology Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology A new Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS), recently approved by the Secretary of Commerce, will help federal agencies

371

Evaluation of China's local enforcement of energy efficiency standards and  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Evaluation of China's local enforcement of energy efficiency standards and Evaluation of China's local enforcement of energy efficiency standards and labeling programs for appliances and equipment Title Evaluation of China's local enforcement of energy efficiency standards and labeling programs for appliances and equipment Publication Type Journal Article Year of Publication 2013 Authors Khanna, Nina Zheng, Nan Zhou, David Fridley, and Cecilia Fino-Chen Journal Energy Policy Date Published 10/2013 Keywords Appliance standards and labeling, compliance, energy efficiency, Low Emission & Efficient Buildings and Equipment Abstract Aims This paper aims to evaluate local enforcement of China's mandatory appliance and equipment energy efficiency standards and labeling programs, two increasingly important policies for meeting national energy and carbon reduction targets. The expected energy savings of efficiency standards and labels can be fully realized only with strong enforcement to ensure compliance for all products sold. This paper provides comprehensive retrospective evaluation of the methodologies, results, progress and remaining challenges in pilot enforcement projects initiated in the absence of consistent national check-testing focused on energy efficiency.

372

E-Print Network 3.0 - administration compliance program Sample...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

finance, compliance issues related to federally funded programs, operational... efficiency, strategic planning, financial modeling, and other administrative,...

373

DOE Publishes Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Regarding the Compliance Date for the Dehumidifier Test Procedure  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Department of Energy has published a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding the compliance date for the dehumidifier test procedure.

374

Contact For The Deputy General Counsel for Environment & Compliance (GC-50)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Kedric L.Payne, Deputy General Counsel for Environment & Compliance202-586-5072kedric.payne@hq.doe.gov

375

Department of Energy Labor Relations and Standards  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The change would be to remove Chapter I, Labor Relations, and Chapter II Labor Standards from DOE O 350.1 and develop DOE O DOE O 350.3, which will cancel and supersede Chapters I and II in DOE O 350.1. Content of the two chapters will be updated to reflect the Secretarial determination transferring functions for contractor labor relations and labor standards from the Office of Legacy Management to the Office of General Counsel. CRDs for those chapters will also be removed.

2014-02-06T23:59:59.000Z

376

H-35 DOE-H-__ Compliance With Internet Protocol Version 6 (Ipv6) In Acquiring Information  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

as appropriate. Consider using in solicitations involving M&O as appropriate. Consider using in solicitations involving M&O contracts, management of major facilities, and any acquisition which could involve the direct or indirect purchase of Information Technology equipment that uses Internet Protocol (IP) technology. DOE-H-__ COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNET PROTOCOL VERSION 6 (IPV6) IN ACQUIRING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (JULY 2011) This contract involves the acquisition of Information Technology (IT) that uses Internet Protocol (IP) technology. The Contractor agrees that (1) all deliverables that involve IT that uses IP (products, services, software, etc.) comply with IPv6 standards and interoperate with both IPv6 and IPv4 systems and products; and (2) it has IPv6 technical support for fielded product management, development and

377

April 2006 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Published 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status

378

Money Laundering and FATF Compliance by the International Community  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Money Laundering and FATF Compliance by the International Community Ali Alkaabi, George Mohay.mohay@qut.edu.au, a.mccullagh@qut.edu.au, a.chantler@qut.edu.au Abstract. This paper examines the anti-money and socio-economic situation, and examine how such local factors have affected the UAE's financial and anti-money

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

379

Replacing ESP controls brings large utility units into compliance  

SciTech Connect

This article examines the effect of retrofitting an electrostatic precipitator (ESP) digital control system on the emissions compliance of a large utility unit. The topics of the article include evaluation of ESP performance, determination of course of action, unit 1 and 2 installation of a digital control system, and results to emissions and performance of the ESP.

Hack, P. (Baltimore Gas and Electric Co., Lusby, MD (United States))

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

380

Environmental management compliance reengineering project, FY 1997 report  

SciTech Connect

Through an integrated reengineering effort, the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) is successfully implementing process improvements that will permit safe and compliant operations to continue during the next 5 years, even though $80 million was removed from the Environmental Management (EM) program budget. A 2-year analysis, design, and implementation project will reengineer compliance-related activities and reduce operating costs by approximately $17 million per year from Fiscal Year (FY) 1998 through 2002, while continuing to meet the INEEL`s environment, safety, and health requirements and milestone commitments. Compliance reengineer`s focus is improving processes, not avoiding full compliance with environmental, safety, and health laws. In FY 1997, compliance reengineering used a three-phase approach to analyze, design, and implement the changes that would decrease operating costs. Implementation for seven specific improvement projects was completed in FY 1997, while five projects will complete implementation in FY 1998. During FY 1998, the three-phase process will be repeated to continue reengineering the INEEL.

VanVliet, J.A.; Davis, J.N.

1997-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "ii compliance standards" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

TUSDM Patient Billing and HIPAA Privacy Compliance Program  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

- Attachment E 14 B4133045v2 #12;1.) Definitions The following definitions are utilized throughout. Because of complex and ever-changing regulatory requirements, the Federal Government has encouraged health care providers to vigorously educate their employees and establish their own compliance program

Dennett, Daniel

382

Compliance Order issued to Los Alamos National Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Pursuant to the authority of the Secretary of Energy under section 234B of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and 10 C.F.R. 5 824.4(b) of the Department's Procedural Rules for the Assessment of Civil Penalties for Classzjied Information Security Violations, I am today issuing the enclosed Compliance Order to Los Alamos National Security, LLC (LANS).

383

3-1 2002 SITE ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT CHAPTER 3: COMPLIANCE STATUS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

3-1 2002 SITE ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT CHAPTER 3: COMPLIANCE STATUS Brookhaven National Laboratory reportable spills of petroleum products occurred on site in 2002. Seventeen were less than 10 gallons: COMPLIANCE STATUS 2002 SITE ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT 3.1 COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS Brookhaven

Homes, Christopher C.

384

Design and Verification of Instantiable Compliance Rule Graphs in Process-Aware  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

against imposed compliance rules. Tab. 1 summarizes quality compliance rules imposed on the software. Nevertheless, for quality assurance, it could be desired to verify c2 over the development process. ThusDesign and Verification of Instantiable Compliance Rule Graphs in Process-Aware Information Systems

Pfeifer, Holger

385

Davis-Bacon Compliance and Performance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PROCUREMENT PROCUREMENT ATTORNEYS CONFERENCE - Contractor Workforce Issues Jean Seibert Stucky Assistant General Counsel February 22, 2011 GC-63 1. Labor issues (unions) 2. Employment issues (equal employment; workforce restructuring) 3. Pensions and other benefits 4. Labor standards (e.g., Davis-Bacon Act) 2 Why is this important? 60-95% of DOE Contract costs are contractor human resource costs - 3 Roles and Responsibilities  DOE is not  The Employer of the contractor work force, or  The sponsor or the fiduciary of their benefit plans  DOE is  The contracting agency, with responsibility to manage its contracts prudently, consistently with applicable law  DOE contractor pension plans are not  Governmental plans, and  DOE does not  Insure the benefits provided

386

Essays on Energy and Regulatory Compliance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, the 10-second moving average readings for the three regulated gases (hydrocarbons, nitric oxide, and carbon monoxide) must be below the applicable test standard, which varies by vehicle, vehicle year and weight. The test takes 90 seconds, though a 15...-test) 65.53 39.60 34.19 35.99 Carbon monoxide 0.0056 0.0028 0.0029 0.0031 23.61 12.19 13.03 13.77 Nitric oxide 0.0240 0.0107 0.0112 0.0118 33.71 15.30 16.37 17.12 Carbon dioxide 0.3109 0.1605 0.0466 0.0475 329.70 183.25 85.62 72.25 Fixed e ects...

Cancho Diez, Cesar

2012-10-19T23:59:59.000Z

387

Compliance, assurance, and pollution prevention at Argonne National Laboratory-East (ANL-E) - process and operations  

SciTech Connect

Argonne National Laboratory-East (ANL-E) is a multi-program laboratory operated by the University of Chicago for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). ANL-E has incorporated its environmental compliance functions and pollution prevention (P2) activities into its processes. Examples of this include standard project and experimental reviews, targeted process analysis, and regulatory and oversight audits. ANL-E's implementation process has allowed them to meet regulatory drivers as well as internal goals with minimal resources. This paper reviews these processes and implementation of the environmental and pollution prevention requirements which have led to an award winning P2 program.

Kamiya, M. A.; Trychta, K.

2000-02-10T23:59:59.000Z

388

Implementation of the Southern Company clean air compliance strategy  

SciTech Connect

The Clean Air Act with the 1990 Amendments is one of the most complex environmental laws to be enacted by Congress. It mandates a vast array of changes that have significantly increased the magnitude and complexity of clean air compliance for sources of air emissions, including coal-fired electric utilities across the US. The Southern Company was involved in the development of the amendments and recognized the necessity, even prior to the November 15, 1990, enactment, for an integrated clean air compliance strategy in order to be able to successfully implement the strategy within a relatively tight compliance timetable. The principle requirements of the amendments that currently affect coal-fired generating plants, and the primary focus of the strategy development and implementation process for The Southern Company, are found in Title IV--Acid Deposition Control. While Title IV contains elements of the traditional command and control approach to regulating nitrogen oxides (NO{sub x}) emissions and emissions monitoring, this title introduces an innovative market-based allowance system approach to regulating sulfur dioxide (SO{sub 2}) emissions. The development of the strategy and its implementation considered other final requirements of the 1990 Amendments, to the extent possible, as well as potential future environmental requirements. The weighing of the various compliance alternatives to develop a cost-effective strategy became and continues to be a major challenge for The Southern Company and other electric utilities. Within The Southern Company, a multidisciplined project team and numerous task forces have continued to review the strategy and its implementation against changes in a number of key drivers including fuel prices, technology costs, expected allowance values, and regulatory developments. This approach provides the flexibility to match a dynamic environment with the appropriate compliance alternatives.

Boyd, K.; Herrin, W.D. [Southern Company Services, Birmingham, AL (United States)

1995-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

389

Functional Area Qualification Standard Job Task Analyses | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Services » Assistance » Federal Technical Capability Program » Services » Assistance » Federal Technical Capability Program » Functional Area Qualification Standard Job Task Analyses Functional Area Qualification Standard Job Task Analyses DOE Aviation Manager DOE Aviation Safety Officer Chemical Processing Civil/Structural Engineering Confinement Ventilation and Process Gas Treatment Construction Management Deactivation and Decommissioning Electrical Systems and Safety Oversight Emergency Management Environmental Compliance Environmental Restoration Facility Representative Fire Protection Engineering General Technical Base Industrial Hygiene Instrument and Controls NNSA Package Certification Engineer Nuclear Explosive Safety Study Nuclear Safety Specialist Quality Assurance Radiation Protection Safeguards and Security Safeguards and Security General Technical Base

390

Functional Area Qualification Standard Reference Guides | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Services » Assistance » Federal Technical Capability Program » Services » Assistance » Federal Technical Capability Program » Functional Area Qualification Standard Reference Guides Functional Area Qualification Standard Reference Guides Aviation Manager Aviation Safety Officer Chemical Processing Civil/Structural Engineering Construction Management Criticality Safety Criticality Safety Support Group, NNSA SC Electrical Systems and Safety Oversight Emergency Management Environmental Compliance Environmental Restoration Facility Maintenance Management Facility Representative Fire Protection Engineering General Technical Base Industrial Hygiene Instrumentation and Control Mechanical Systems NNSA Package Certification Engineer Nuclear Safety Specialists Occupational Safety Quality Assurance Radiation Protection Safeguards and Security

391

Functional Area Qualification Standard Qualification Cards | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Services » Assistance » Federal Technical Capability Program » Services » Assistance » Federal Technical Capability Program » Functional Area Qualification Standard Qualification Cards Functional Area Qualification Standard Qualification Cards Note: 1. Save the document from the website onto your PC and close it. 2. Open the document on your PC. Answer "No" to the question regarding whether to open the documents as read only. Aviation Manager Aviation Safety Officer Chemical Processing Civil Structural Engineering Confinement Ventilation and Process Gas Treatment Construction Management Criticality Safety Deactivation and Decommissioning Electrical Systems and Safety Oversight Emergency Management Environmental Compliance Environmental Restoration Facility Maintenance Management Facility Representative Fire Protection

392

October 2005 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standards Actions 1 Standards Actions 1 New Projects and DOE Technical Standards in Revision 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Recently Published 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 DOE Technical Standards Program

393

July 2010 Altera Corporation Nios II Software Developer's Handbook Preliminary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

are new to the Nios II processor. Programs based on the HAL use the ANSI C standard library functions largely conforms to the familiar ANSI C standard library functions, though the ANSI C standard library is separate from the HAL. The close integration of the ANSI C standard library and the HAL makes it possible

Bakos, Jason D.

394

November 2005 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Technical DOE Technical Standards in Revision 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Revisions 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association

395

April 2007 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 Technical Standards Published 2 Non-Government Standards Actions 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 DOE Technical

396

September 2005 Standards Forum and Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Page September 2005 Page September 2005 TSP Manager's Notes 1 The Halo Effect: American National Standards and the rest 2 Standards Development for Report- ing of Declarable Substances 5 Technical Standards Manager Spotlight 8 DOE Revises "Integration of Environment, Safety, and Health

397

The Standard Model Beyond the Standard Model  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

physics with top quark Search for Extra-dimensions Conclusions 1 The Standard Model Building block quark Search for Extra-dimensions Conclusions Building block The particles and forces The Standard Model the Standard Model New physics with top quark Search for Extra-dimensions Conclusions Building block

398

December 2006 Standards Forum and Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 2006 December 2006 TSP Manager's Notes 1 Meeting In The Middle 2 Plain Talk for a New Generation 3 Licensing New Nuclear Power Plants 4 ANSI Government Affairs Overview 5 Technical Standards Manager Spotlight 7 Topical Committee Developments 8 Welcome Aboard the TSMC! 8 Standards Actions 9 DOE Standards Actions 9

399

PARS II Training Materials | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PARS II Training Materials PARS II Training Materials PARS II Training Materials PARS II presentation hand-outs and step-by-step "how to" exercises for each course are available for download. Users who are attending Web classes should download these documents prior to attending the class. PARS 102 - Monthly Updating and Reporting Introduction to PARS II, finding and selecting projects in your domain, viewing Oversight and Assessment (OA) data, viewing Contractor Project Performance (CPP) dashboards, updating your monthly status assessment, adding attachments, and running standard, pre-built reports. PARS 102 Presentation PARS 102 Workbook PARS 103 - Updating Projects and Reporting Introduction to PARS II, finding and selecting projects in your domain, entering new projects into PARS II, entering and editing Oversight and

400

Standards Actions, July 2002  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standards Program Document Status 07-01-2002 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 46 Out for Comment - 14 Published this Month - 2 5-year Review Status Revision in Progress - 11 Reaffirmation in Progress - 12 Cancellation Pending - 7 Cancellation in Progress - 1 No Current Action - 19 Inside this issue: DOE Technical Standards Projects Initiated 1 DOE Technical Standards Re- cently Sent for Coordination 1 DOE Technical Standards Re- cently Published 1 American National Standards Institute 2 American Society for Testing and Materials International 4 Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. Standards Actions- July 2002 Standards Actions DOE Technical Standards Projects Initiated

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "ii compliance standards" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Standards Actions, May 2001  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

30-2001 30-2001 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 39 Out for Comment - 19 Published this Month - 0 5-year Review Status Revision in Progress - 4 Reaffirmation in Progress - 23 Cancellation Pending - 9 Cancellation in Progress - 18 No Current Action - 12 Inside this issue: DOE Technical Standards Projects Initiated 1 DOE Technical Standards Proposed for Reaffirmation 1 Proposed Cancellation of DOE Technical Standards 2 Published DOE Technical Standards 3 American National Standards Institute 3 American National Standards 6 American Society for Testing and Materials 6 Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. May 2001 Standards Actions DOE Technical Standards Projects Initiated

402

DOE Technical Standards Program Standards Actions Newsletter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

* * New DOE Standard, Communicating Waste Characterization and DOT Hazard Classification Requirements * Workshops and Events * The Annual Energy Facility Contractors Group Safety Analysis Workshop * 2012 Chemical Safety and Life Cycle Management Workshop * Nuclear Safety- Related Standards Activity INSIDE THIS ISSUE April 2012 Standards Actions Technical Standards Program Newsletter www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ New DOE Standard, Communicating Waste Characterization and DOT Hazard Classification Requirements The Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) has a challenging mission to solve many problems posed by the legacy of the Cold War, including the transportation of unprecedented amounts of contaminated waste,

403

May 2005 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Revisions 1 DOE Technical Standards Projects Initiated 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 04-27-2005 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 25

404

DOE Approved Technical Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The DOE Technical Standards Program promotes the use of voluntary consensus standards at DOE, manages and facilitates DOE's efforts to develop and maintain necessary technical standards, and communicates information on technical standards activities to people who develop or use technical standards in DOE.

405

The new standards HVAC background noise requirements and their implementation in building design  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The new ANSI classroom standard recommends long?term steady?state background sound level limits of 35 dBA and 55 dBC. Since the HVAC system is typically a rooms dominant steady?state noise source it is usually reasonable to apply these limits to the design of the system assuming that other noise sources produce insignificant additions to the rooms long?term background noise environment. The recommended sound level limits are significantly lower than current industry standards and complying with them will increase system costs. School administrators architects and HVAC system designers should therefore be prepared for the changes. This paper summarizes equipment selection and system design guidelines that have been found to be necessary for ensuring compliance with the sound level limits.

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

406

Mr. Ken Blower, Manager Corporate Environmental Affairs Standard...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

ad. 3 0 II, 0 s 3 & Mr. Ken Blower, Manager Corporate Environmental Affairs Standard Oil Company of Ohio Midland Building Cleveland, Ohio 44115 qITIALSSIG Jhitman )ATE 1 86...

407

Industrial Hygiene Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

38-2007 38-2007 November 2007 DOE STANDARD INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1138-2007 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ DOE-STD-1138-2007 iv INTENTIONALLY BLANK DOE-STD-1138-2007 v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENT ....................................................................................................iii PURPOSE.......................................................................................................................

408

Nuclear Safety Specialist Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

83-2007 83-2007 November 2007 DOE STANDARD NUCLEAR SAFETY SPECIALIST FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1183-2007 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ DOE-STD-1183-2007 iv INTENTIONALLY BLANK DOE-STD-1183-2007 v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENT ................................................................................................................ vii PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................................9

409

Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance NEPA Requirements and Guidance - Search Index Quickly search through 100+ NEPA requirements and guidance documents to find information on NEPA topics. Read more DOE NEPA Projects Currently Open for Public Comment Find how to comment on DOE NEPA documents in an area of interest. Read more NEPA Success Stories from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports This compilation describes DOE NEPA reviews that resulted in better planning, enhanced public participation, and protection of sensitive environmental resources. Read more Latest Documents & Notices January 17, 2014 EIS-0488: EPA Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement Cameron Liquefaction Project, Cameron Parish, Louisiana January 15, 2014 EIS-0460: Record of Decision

410

Federal Energy Management Program: EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data EISA 432 Overview EISA requires Federal agencies to identify "covered facilities" that constitute at least 75% of their total facility energy use as subject to the requirements of the statute. Each Federal agency must designate an energy manager responsible for implementing the requirements at each covered facility. Comprehensive energy and water evaluations are to be performed at each covered facility every four years to identify potential energy and water efficiency and conservation measures. EISA requires agencies to report progress toward these requirements in CTS, along with: Estimated cost and savings for projects implemented in covered facilities Measured savings for implemented projects

411

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY Project Information Project Title: Liner Drilling Date:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Liner Drilling Date: Liner Drilling Date: 4-5-10 DOE Code: 71092 Cont ractor Code: 8067-766 Project Lead: Frank Ingham Project Overview Nothing out of the ordinary for drilling an existing location 1. What are the environmental impacts? NE SW Sec 21 , T39N, R78W (45-3-X-21 well) 2. What is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? Approximately a week 4 . What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, Drilling Rig etc.)? Will Drill out of 9 5/8 caslng with liner drillng assembly. After drilling approximately 750 to 1000 ft, will test liner hanging assembly set and retrieve multiple times. The table b elow is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialis t and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey a

412

Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance NEPA Requirements and Guidance - Search Index Quickly search through 100+ NEPA requirements and guidance documents to find information on NEPA topics. Read more DOE NEPA Projects Currently Open for Public Comment Find how to comment on DOE NEPA documents in an area of interest. Read more NEPA Success Stories from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports This compilation describes DOE NEPA reviews that resulted in better planning, enhanced public participation, and protection of sensitive environmental resources. Read more Latest Documents & Notices January 10, 2014 EIS-0488: FERC Draft Environmental Impact Statement Cameron Pipeline Expansion Project and Cameron LNG Liquefaction Project, Cameron Parish, Louisiana January 10, 2014

413

Administrative Order Requiring Compliance and Assessing Civil Penalty  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Administrative Compliance Order No. HWB-14-20 (CO) Pursuant to the New Mexico Hazardous Waste Act ("HWA"), NMSA 1978, Sections 74-4-1 to -14, the Hazardous Waste Bureau ("HWB") of the Environmental Health Division ("Division") of the New Mexico Environmental Department ("NMED") issues this Administrative Compliance Order ("Order") to the United States Department of Energy ("DOE"), and Los Alamos National Security, LLC ("LANS"; collectively, with DOE, the "Respondents"), requiring the Respondents to comply with the terms and conditions of this Order relating to the Los Alamos National Laboratory ("LANL" or "Facility"), and assessing a civil penalty for violations of the HWA, the Hazardous Waste Management Regulations, 20.4.1 NMAC ("HWMR"), and the Facility Permit, EPA I.D. NUMBER NM0890010515-TSDF (Permit").

414

Integration of RCRA corrective action with Clean Water Act compliance  

SciTech Connect

A synthetic fibers manufacturing facility is implementing an integrated phased program to upgrade its existing wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) to comply with both the Clean Water Act and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The existing WWTP consists of an influent settling basin, two equalization basins, two aeration basins with low- and high-speed aerators, three secondary clarifiers, post-aeration, and belt filter press dewatering with on-site landfilling. The existing WWTP will be replaced with a tank-based system that will include equalization, biological treatment, clarification, effluent filtration, and effluent diffusion. RCRA regulatory compliance incorporated the Corrective Action Program, the Toxicity Characteristic Rule, the Land Disposal Restrictions, and closure/postclosure requirements. Clean Water Act compliance incorporated the Organic Chemicals, Plastics, and Synthetic Fibers (OCPSF) effluent guidelines, effluent toxicity and general water quality requirements. Logistically, project implementation involved fast-track design and construction, close regulatory interface, and maintenance of production process continuity.

Cable, J.K.; Starlin, L.A.; Giltner, J.A.: Futch, R.S.; Ballard, R.W. (CH2M Hill, Atlanta, GA (United States))

1992-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

415

Compliance Order issued to Los Alamos National Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

12,2007 12,2007 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Dr. Michael T. Anastasio Laboratory Director Los Alamos National Laboratory MS-A1 00 SM-30, Bikini Atoll Road Los Alamos, NM 87545 Dear Dr. Anastasio: Pursuant to the authority of the Secretary of Energy under section 234B of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and 10 C.F.R. 5 824.4(b) of the Department's Procedural Rules for the Assessment of Civil Penalties for Classzjied Information Security Violations, I am today issuing the enclosed Compliance Order to Los Alamos National Security, LLC (LANS). The Compliance Order directs LANS to implement specific corrective actions to remediate both the laboratory management deficiencies that contributed to the thumb drive security incident at Los Alarnos National Laboratory (LANL) discovered in

416

Environmental Standardization for Sustainability  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Environmental Standardization for Sustainability by Professor John W. Bagby College of Information that environmental controls are expressed as environmental standards, a traditional driver of investment in pollution control. Environmental standards spur investment in green technologies that promise to stimulate

Bagby, John

417

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Biennial Environmental Compliance Report  

SciTech Connect

This Biennial Environmental Compliance Report (BECR) documents environmental regulatory compliance at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), a facility designed for the safe disposal of transuranic (TRU) radioactive waste, for the reporting period of April 1, 2000, to March 31, 2002. As required by the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act (LWA)(Public Law [Pub. L.] 102-579, as amended by Pub. L. 104-201), the BECR documents U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Carlsbad Field Office's (CBFO) compliance with applicable environmental protection laws and regulations implemented by agencies of the federal government and the state of New Mexico. In the prior BECR, the CBFO and the management and operating contractor (MOC)committed to discuss resolution of a Letter of Violation that had been issued by the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) in August 1999, which was during the previous BECR reporting period. This Letter of Violation alleged noncompliance with hazardous waste aisle spacing, labeling, a nd tank requirements. At the time of publication of the prior BECR, resolution of the Letter of Violation was pending. On July 7, 2000, the NMED issued a letter noting that the aisle spacing and labeling concerns had been adequately addressed and that they were rescinding the violation alleging that the Exhaust Shaft Catch Basin failed to comply with the requirements for a hazardous waste tank. During the current reporting period, WIPP received a Notice of Violation and a compliance order alleging the violation of the New Mexico Hazardous Waste Regulations and the WIPP Hazardous Waste Facility Permit (HWFP).

Washinton TRU Solutions LLC

2002-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

418

February 2007 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Published1 Non-Government Standards Actions 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 Publication Staff Roster 2

419

SF 6432-EI Standard Terms and Conditions for All Cost Reimbursement...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

SANDIA CORPORATION SF 6432-EI (10-98) SECTION II STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR ALL COST REIMBURSEMENT OR AS ORDERED AGREEMENTS WITH EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS The following...

420

A search for the standard model Higgs boson produced in association with a W boson.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

??We present a search for a standard model Higgs boson produced in association with a W boson using data collected with the CDF II detector (more)

Frank, Martin J., 1983-

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "ii compliance standards" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Polyethylene as a Radiation Shielding Standard in Simulated Cosmic-Ray Environments  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

on the ISS through polyethylene shielding augmentation ofnucleon Iron-56 in Polyethylene. II. , Comparisons betweenPolyethylene as a Radiation Shielding Standard in Simulated

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

422

Building Technologies Office: Standard Energy Efficiency Data Platform  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Standard Energy Efficiency Data Platform Standard Energy Efficiency Data Platform The Standard Energy Efficiency Data (SEED) platform is a software tool that provides a standardized format for collecting, storing and analyzing building energy performance information about large portfolios. The platform provides an easy, flexible, and cost effective method to analyze data about large portfolios of buildings and demonstrate the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency. State and local governments and building portfolio owners can use SEED to: Establish their own secure, cloud-based data repository. Import data automatically from EPA's Portfolio Manager and merge that with other existing datasets such as property records and energy audits. Create custom search and reporting capabilities, such as compliance monitoring or performance analysis.

423

NEPA Implementation Procedures: Appendices I, II, and III | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA Implementation Procedures: Appendices I, II, and III NEPA Implementation Procedures: Appendices I, II, and III NEPA Implementation Procedures: Appendices I, II, and III These appendices are intended to improve public participation and facilitate agency compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Council on Environmental Quality's NEPA Regulations, the last version appeared in the Federal Register of Friday, December 21,1984 (49 FR 49754). Note: The specfic contact information is outdated and should not be used for consultation or outreach. Appendix I - Federal and Federal-State Agency NEPA Contacts Appendix II - Federal and Federal- State Agencies With Jurisdiction by Law or Special Expertise on Environmental Quality Issues Appendix III - Federal and Federal-State Agency Offices for

424

File:Cert Compliance inst 0110.pdf | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Cert Compliance inst 0110.pdf Cert Compliance inst 0110.pdf Jump to: navigation, search File File history File usage File:Cert Compliance inst 0110.pdf Size of this preview: 463 × 599 pixels. Other resolution: 464 × 600 pixels. Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 Go! next page → next page → Full resolution ‎(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 90 KB, MIME type: application/pdf, 5 pages) File history Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time. Date/Time Thumbnail Dimensions User Comment current 17:26, 13 November 2012 Thumbnail for version as of 17:26, 13 November 2012 1,275 × 1,650, 5 pages (90 KB) Dklein2012 (Talk | contribs) You cannot overwrite this file. Edit this file using an external application (See the setup instructions for more information) File usage There are no pages that link to this file.

425

April 2011 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3009 3009 Revision * DOE Standard 1066 Revision * New DOE Standards Projects * Incidents of Security Concern Technical Standard * Explosives Safety * Operations Assessment Field Handbook * Reporting of Radioactive Sealed Sources Program * Occurrence Reporting Causal Analysis Guide * Nuclear Safety-Related Standards Activity INSIDE THIS ISSUE April 2011 Standards Actions Technical Standards Program Newsletter www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ DOE Standard 3009 Revision The Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance (HS-21), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted workshops in January and March to support a major revision of Department of Energy (DOE) Standard 3009, Preparation Guide for U.S. Department of Energy Nonreactor

426

Codes and Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Currently, thirteen U.S. and two international standards development organizations (SDOs) are developing and publishing the majority of the voluntary domestic codes and standards. These...

427

Aviation Safety Officer Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

64-2003 64-2003 September 2003 CHANGE NOTICE NO. 1 January 2010 DOE STANDARD AVIATION SAFETY OFFICER FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1164-2003 CH-1 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ DOE-STD-1164-2003 CH-1 iv List of Changes Page/paragraph Change Page ii Change to new FAQS format Page iii Change in approval signature Page iv Added list of changes Page v Updated Table of Contents Page vii Changes to organizational names and

428

Aviation Manager Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-STD-1165-2003 September 2003 CHANGE NOTICE NO. 1 December 2009 DOE STANDARD AVIATION MANAGER FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1165-2003 CH-1 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ DOE-STD-1165-2003 CH-1 iv List of Changes Page/paragraph Change Page ii Change to new FAQS format Page iii Change in approval signature Page iv Added list of changes Page v Changes to Table of Contents Page vii Changes to organizational names and

429

May 2009 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 2009 May 2009 U.S. Department of Energy Technical Standards Program (http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/) Standards Actions 1.0 DOE STANDARDS ACTIONS The Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards Program (TSP) publishes Standards Actions on a monthly basis to provide DOE headquarters and field elements with current information on DOE and select non-government standards activities. The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the TSP web page at: http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/. To access these standards, go to our web page, click on "DOE Technical Standards," then choose Projects, Approved Standards, Recently Approved Standards, or Drafts for Review, as

430

February 2009 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 2009 February 2009 U.S. Department of Energy Technical Standards Program (http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/) Standards Actions 1.0 DOE STANDARDS ACTIONS The Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards Program (TSP) publishes Standards Actions on a monthly basis to provide DOE headquarters and field elements with current information on DOE and select non-government standards activities. The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the TSP web page at: http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/. To access these standards, go to our web page, click on "DOE Technical Standards," then choose Projects, Approved Standards, Recently Approved Standards, or Drafts for Review, as

431

July 2009 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 2009 U.S. Department of Energy Technical Standards Program (http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/) Standards Actions 1.0 DOE STANDARDS ACTIONS The Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards Program (TSP) publishes Standards Actions on a monthly basis to provide DOE headquarters and field elements with current information on DOE and select non-government standards activities. The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the TSP web page at: http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/. To access these standards, go to our web page, click on "DOE Technical Standards," then choose Projects, Approved Standards, Recently Approved Standards, or Drafts for Review, as

432

May 2010 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 2010 U.S. Department of Energy Technical Standards Program (http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/) Standards Actions 1.0 DOE STANDARDS ACTIONS The Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards Program (TSP) publishes Standards Actions on a monthly basis to provide DOE headquarters and field elements with current information on DOE and select non-government standards activities. The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the TSP web page at: http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/. To access these standards, go to our web page, click on "DOE Technical Standards," then choose Projects, Approved Standards, Recently Approved Standards, or Drafts for Review, as

433

Integration of Environmental Compliance at the Savannah River Site - 13024  

SciTech Connect

The Savannah River Site (SRS) is a large federal installation hosting diverse missions and multiple organizations with competing regulatory needs. Accordingly, there was a need to integrate environmental compliance strategies to ensure the consistent flow of information between Department of Energy-Savannah River (DOE-SR), the regulatory agencies and other interested parties. In order to meet this objective, DOE and major SRS contractors and tenants have committed to a strategy of collaboratively working together to ensure that a consistent, integrated, and fully coordinated approach to environmental compliance and regulator relationships is maintained. DOE-SR and Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, the SRS management and operations contractor, have established an environmental compliance integration process that provides for the consistent flow down of requirements to projects, facilities, SRS contractors, and subcontractors as well as the upward flow of information to assist in the early identification and resolution of environmental regulatory issues and enhancement of compliance opportunities. In addition, this process strongly fosters teamwork to collaboratively resolve complex regulatory challenges, promote pollution prevention and waste minimization opportunities to advance site missions in a manner that balances near-term actions with the long-term site vision, while being protective of human health and the environment. Communication tools are being utilized, some with enhancements, to ensure appropriate information is communicated to all levels with environmental responsibility at SRS. SRS internal regulatory integration is accomplished through a variety of informational exchange forums (e.g., Challenges, Opportunities and Resolution (COR) Team, DOE's Joint Site Regulatory Integration Team, and the Senior Environmental Managers Council (SEMC)). SRS communications and problem-solving with the regulatory agencies have been enhanced through formation of an interagency 'SRS Regulatory Integration Team (SRIT)'. The SRIT is a partnership comprised of representatives from DOE-SR (with contractor support), EPA Region 4 and the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) and is chartered to develop a consensus understanding of SRS regulatory issues and activities. These forums and a formal environmental compliance integration process improve timely cross-functional decision making, problem solving, information sharing, and issue resolution. The SRS internal process has been formally documented in an Environmental Regulatory Integration Program Description, which is linked to the SRS Environmental Policy and agreed upon by all major contractors, subcontractors and tenants. (authors)

Hoel, David [United States Department of Energy - Savannah River Operations Office (United States)] [United States Department of Energy - Savannah River Operations Office (United States); Griffith, Michael [Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC (United States)] [Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC (United States)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

434

Facility Representative Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-STD-1151-2010 October 2010 DOE STANDARD FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1151-2010 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Office of Health, Safety and Security Approved DOE Technical Standards Web Site at http://www.hss.doe.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/standard/standard.html DOE-STD-1151-2010 iii APPROVAL The Federal Technical Capability Panel consists of senior U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) managers responsible for overseeing the Federal Technical Capability Program. This Panel is

435

A Comparative Analysis of Residential Energy Use for 2009 IECC Code Compliance and 2001 IECC Compliance with 2006 NAECA Appliance Standards for Selected Climate Zones in Texas  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This paper presents results of a comparative analysis of the electricity and natural gas savings from the implementation of 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) when compared with the 2001 IECC1 specifications with 2006 NAECA for a new...

Mukhopadhyay, J.; Baltazar, J. C.; Liu, Z.; Haberl, J.; Culp, C.; Yazdani, B.

436

December 2005 Standards Forum  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Page December 2005 Page December 2005 TSP Manager's Notes 1 Overview of the U.S. Standardization System 2 A Call for Greater Collaboration 5 Technical Standards Manager Spotlight 6 Topical Committee Developments 7 Welcome Aboard the TSMC! 8 DOE Standards Actions 9 Non-Government Standards

437

CR TELECOMMUNICATIONS STANDARDS TELECOMMUNICATIONS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

CR TELECOMMUNICATIONS STANDARDS TELECOMMUNICATIONS STANDARDS Published JANUARY 2002 January 2002 Page 1 of 137 #12;CR TELECOMMUNICATIONS STANDARDS January 2002 Page 2 of 137 FOREWARD Approval to CR Telecommunications Standards. · The format of this document has been changed to resemble

California at Davis, University of

438

Technical Standards Program  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The Technical Standards Program (TSP) promotes the use of voluntary consensus standards by the Department of Energy (DOE), provides DOE with the means to develop needed technical standards, and manages overall technical standards information, activities, issues, and interactions. Cancels DOE O 1300.2A. Canceled by DOE O 252.1A

1999-11-19T23:59:59.000Z

439

Facilities Management CAD Standards  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Facilities Management CAD Standards 2011 #12;Facilities Management CAD Standards Providing: Layering Standards 2.1 Layer Name Format 2.2 Layer Name Modifiers 2.3 Layer Attributes 2.4 Special Layer of PDF and DWG Files APPENDIX A: DAL FM CAD Standard Layers APPENDIX B: DAL FM CAD Special Layers

Brownstone, Rob

440

Environmental Services Standard Tasks  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1 Environmental Services Operations Standard Tasks The primary function of Environmental Services developed and implemented standard custodial tasks that meet industry standards. The standards are as follows: Exterior Building Cleaning Daily Clean ash urns Clean entry area glass Clean steps and remove

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "ii compliance standards" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Technical Standards Program  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The Order promotes DOE's use of Voluntary Consensus Standards (VCS) as the primary method for application of technical standards and establishes and manages the DOE Technical Standards Program (TSP) including technical standards development, information, activities, issues, and interactions. Admin Chg 1 dated 3-12-13.

2011-02-23T23:59:59.000Z

442

March 2006 Standards Forum and Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 March 2006 1 March 2006 TSP Manager's Notes 1 New ISO Policy Provides International Solutions to Market Needs 2 Plain Talk for a New Generation 5 The Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards within the Department of Energy 7 Two Change Notices for DOE Standard 1104 8

443

February 2013 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Standards Actions Technical Standards Program Newsletter U . S . D E PA R T M E N T O F O ffi ce O f nuclear SaFety ENERGY inSide thiS iSSue * Featured DOE Technical Standards Activities * DOE Technical Standards Cost- Savings and Access Improvement Initiative * Domestic and International Nuclear Energy Voluntary Consensus Standards Needs * Nuclear Safety- Related Standards Activity Featured dOe technical StandardS activitieS DOE Technical Standards Cost-Savings and Access Improvement Initiative By Helen Todosow, Brookhaven National Laboratory The Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards Managers (TSM) are actively exploring ways to save the government and tax payers' money while at the same time significantly improving efficiencies in access and use of voluntary consensus

444

NETL Publication Standards Manual  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Standards NETL Publication Standards Manual Publication Standards Manual Click on topic below to view Click "Contents" in the bookmarks panel at the left of your screen to return to this page Introduction * Overview * About This Manual - Point of Contact - Download Files - Permission - Signage - Special Applications Publication Standards * Design Elements * Fact Sheets * Font (Typeface) * Full-Size Brochures * Logo * Presentations * Report Covers NETL Publication Standards Manual Overview For over 60 years, we have been at the forefront

445

Surface Water Quality Standards  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

SURFACE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS AAs part of the ongoing program to manage Texaswater quality, the Texas Commission onEnvironmental Quality (TCEQ) is currently review- ing the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards, including the standards... for contact recreation use. Preliminary public comment plus input from the Surface Water Quality Standards Advisory Work Group have provided guidance on options available for revising the standards, said Jim Davenport, leader of the TCEQ Water Quality...

Wythe, Kathy

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

446

Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, LLC in Compliance with Order No.  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, LLC in Compliance with Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, LLC in Compliance with Order No. 202-05-03 Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, LLC in Compliance with Order No. 202-05-03 Docket No. EO-05-01: Attached is the Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, LLC, which is being submitted in compliance with Order No. 202-05-03, issued by the Department of Energy on December 20, 2005, in the captioned proceeding. Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, LLC in Compliance with Order No. 202-05-03 More Documents & Publications Supplement Number 1 to Operating Plan of Mirnat Potomac River, LLC in Compliance with Order No. 202-05-03 Re: Potomac River Generating Station Department of Energy Case No. EO-05-01: Advanced Notice of Power Outages. Docket No. EO-05-01: Further Notice of 230kV Circuit Planned Outages

447

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Federal Facility Compliance Order, February 24, 1997 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Facility Compliance Act Order for Lawrence Federal Facility Compliance Act Order for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Compliance Order HWCA 96/97-5002 State California Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) FFCAct Scope Summary Require compliance by the DOE with a Site Treatment Plan for the treatment of mixed waste at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Parties DOE; State of California Environmental Protection Agency (Department of Toxic Substances Control) Date 2/24/1997 SCOPE * Require compliance by the DOE with a Site Treatment Plan for the treatment of mixed waste at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. * Address LDR requirements pertaining to storage and treatment of covered waste at LLNL. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * The Compliance Plan Volume of the STP provides overall schedules for achieving

448

Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research Compliance Order, October 6, 1995 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy-Related Health Research Energy-Related Health Research Agreement Name Federal Facility Compliance Act Order for the Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research (LEHR) Compliance Order HWCA # 95/96-020 State California Agreement Type Compliance Order Legal Driver(s) FFCAct Scope Summary Require compliance by the DOE with a Site Treatment Plan for the treatment of mixed waste at the Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research Parties DOE; State of California Environmental Protection Agency (Department of Toxic Substances Control) Date 10/6/1995 SCOPE * Require compliance by the DOE with a Site Treatment Plan for the treatment of mixed waste at the Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * The Compliance Plan Volume of the STP provides overall schedules for achieving

449

STANDARD OPERATING PROTOCOLS FOR DECOMMISSIONING  

SciTech Connect

Decommissioning projects at Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) sites are conducted under project-specific decision documents, which involve extensive preparation time, public comment periods, and regulatory approvals. Often, the decision documents must be initiated at least one year before commencing the decommissioning project, and they are expensive and time consuming to prepare. The Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS) is a former nuclear weapons production plant at which hazardous substances and wastes were released or disposed during operations. As a result of the releases, RFETS was placed on the National Priorities List in 1989, and is conducting cleanup activities under a federal facilities compliance agreement. Working closely with interested stakeholders and state and federal regulatory agencies, RFETS has developed and implemented an improved process for obtaining the approvals. The key to streamlining the approval process has been the development of sitewide decision documents called Rocky Flats Cleanup Agreement Standard Operating Protocols or ''RSOPs.'' RSOPs have broad applicability, and could be used instead of project-specific documents. Although no two decommissioning projects are exactly the same and they may vary widely in contamination and other hazards, the basic steps taken for cleanup are usually similar. Because of this, using RSOPs is more efficient than preparing a separate project-specific decision documents for each cleanup action. Over the Rocky Flats cleanup life cycle, using RSOPs has the potential to: (1) Save over 5 million dollars and 6 months on the site closure schedule; (2) Eliminate preparing one hundred and twenty project-specific decision documents; and (3) Eliminate writing seventy-five closure description documents for hazardous waste unit closure and corrective actions.

Foss, D. L.; Stevens, J. L.; Gerdeman, F. W.

2002-02-25T23:59:59.000Z

450

August 2001 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7-31-2001 7-31-2001 Activity Summary In Conversion-4 In Preparation-43 Out for Comment-17 Published this Month-0 5-year Review Status Revision in Progress-6 Reaffirmation in Progress-23 Cancellation Pending-4 Cancellation in Progress-12 Proposed for Cancellation-13 No Current Action-11 Inside this issue: DOE Technical Standards Project Initiated 1 DOE Technical Standards Recently Sent for Coordination 1 DOE Technical Standard Recently Reaffirmed 1 DOE Technical Standards Recently Published 2 American National Standards Institute 2 American National Standards 4 American Society for Testing and Materials 5 Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. Standards Actions- August 2001 Standards

451

November 2000 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 2000 November 2000 Standards Technical Standards Program Document Status Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site: http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/ DOE Technical Standards Projects Initiated If you have any questions or are interested in participating in the development of these standards, please contact the representatives listed below. Complete listings of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status are given on the Technical Standards Pro- gram (TSP) Web Site referenced at the bottom of this page. To access these lists from the home page, click on “DOE Technical Standards,” then click on “Projects” in the left- hand frame to show the links to the project lists. The following DOE Technical Standards projects were recently initiated: • Radiological Control Programs for Special Tritium Compounds, Project Number OCSH-

452

Performance Assessment in Support of the 1996 Compliance Certification Application for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant  

SciTech Connect

The conceptual and computational structure of a performance assessment (PA) for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) is described. Important parts of thk structure are @ maintenance of a separation between stochastic (i.e., aleatory) and subjective (i.e., epistemic) uncertain, with stochastic uncefinty arising from the many possible disruptions that could occur over the 10,000 Y regulatory period fiat applies to the WIPP and subjective uncertainty arising from `the imprecision with which many of the quantities rquired in tie `hdysis are known, (ii) use of Latin hypercttbe sampling to incorporate the effects of subjective uncefirtty, (iii) use of Monte Carlo (i.e., random) sampling to incorporate the effects of stochastic uncetinty, and OV) efficient use of tie necessarily limited number of mechanistic calculations that can be performed to SUPPOII the analysis. The WIPP is under development by the U.S. Department of Ener~ (DOE) for the geologic (i.e., deep underground) disposal of transuranic (TRU) waste, with the indicated PA supporting a ~Compliance Certification Application (CCA) by the DOE to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in October 1996 for tie necessary certifications for the WIPP to begin operation. If certified, the WIPP will be the first operational faciliv in tie United States for the geologic disposal of ra&oactive waste.

Anderson, D.R.; Basabilvazo, G.; Helton, J.C.; Jow, H.-N.; Marietta, M.G.

1998-10-14T23:59:59.000Z

453

Format and Content Guide for Title 40 CFR 191 and Title 40 CFR 268.6 Compliance Reports  

SciTech Connect

This Format and Content Guide was followed in preparing the WIPP Compliance Status Report submitted in March 1994 and will be used for the compliance documents scheduled for submittal in the Spring of 1995. The Compliance Status Report was issued to stakeholders in March 1994 and describes the status of associated activities on compliance with the requirements in Title 40 CFR 268.6 and Title 40 CFR 191. The Compliance Status Report focuses on (1) the information required for a demonstration of compliance, (2) preliminary results, (3) the areas of the WIPP program that are either not currently mature enough, or do not provide adequate margin for a demonstration of compliance, and (4) the areas of the WIPP program that will be focused upon to provide the remaining necessary information for use in the 1995 compliance demonstration reports. The Compliance Status Report is not intended to constitute a statement of compliance or a demonstration of compliance. It is intended to report the status of progress made to date in project efforts to achieve the required level of data/information necessary for the required compliance demonstrations. Comments on the Compliance Status Report from stakeholders will likely result in a modified Format and Content Guide, as will the promulgation of the EPA`s Compliance Criteria for WIPP (40 CFR 194).

Not Available

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

454

EA-1406: Ground Water Compliance at the New Rifle, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site, Rifle, Colorado  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This EA evaluates the environmental impacts for the proposed compliance strategy of natural flushing combined with institutional controls and continued monitoring for the New Rifle uranium mill...

455

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance at Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico (SNL/NM)  

SciTech Connect

This report on National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance at Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico (SNL/NM) chronicles past and current compliance activities and includes a recommended strategy that can be implemented for continued improvement. This report provides a list of important references. Attachment 1 contains the table of contents for SAND95-1648, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance Guide Sandia National Laboratories (Hansen, 1995). Attachment 2 contains a list of published environmental assessments (EAs) and environmental impact statements (EISs) prepared by SNL/NM. Attachment 3 contains abstracts of NEPA compliance papers authored by SNL/NM and its contractors.

Wolff, T.A. [Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States). Community Involvement and Issues Management Dept.; Hansen, R.P. [Hansen Environmental Consultants, Englewood, CO (United States)

1998-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

456

2014-04-17 DOE Certification, Compliance, and Enforcement Overview for Plumbing Products  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This presentation provides an overview of DOE certification, compliance, and enforcement for plumbing products. It was presented via webinar on April 17, 2014.

457

Table of Contents Page i 2013 Residential Compliance Manual January 2014  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Panel 7.6 California Fire Code Solar Access Requirements 7.7 Compliance and Enforcement #12;Page 7. Solar Ready ..................................................................................2 7.3 Solar Zone

458

Evaluation of the Cask Transportation Facility Modifications (CTFM) compliance to DOE order 6430.1A  

SciTech Connect

This report was prepared to evaluate the compliance of Cask Transportation Facility Modifications (CTFM) to DOE Order 6430.1A.

ARD, K.E.

1999-07-14T23:59:59.000Z

459

Mechanical and Thermal Prototype Testing for a Rotatable Collimator for the LHC Phase II Collimation Upgrade  

SciTech Connect

The Phase II upgrade to the LHC collimation system calls for complementing the robust Phase I graphite collimators with high Z, low impedance Phase II collimators. The design for the collimation upgrade has not been finalized. One option is to use metallic rotatable collimators and testing of this design will be discussed here. The Phase II collimators must be robust in various operating conditions and accident scenarios. A prototype collimator jaw has been tested for both mechanical and thermal compliance with the design goals. Thermal expansion bench-top tests are compared to ANSYS simulation results.

Smith, Jeffrey Claiborne; Doyle, Eric; Keller, Lewis; Lundgren, Steven; Markiewicz, Thomas Walter; /SLAC; ,

2010-08-26T23:59:59.000Z

460

Standards Actions, February 2004  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 DOE Technical Standards Recently Sent for Coordination 1 DOE Technical Standards Recently Published 1 Non-Government Standards 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 5 American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) 6 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 11 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 12 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 01-23-2004 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 36 Out for Comment - 23 Published in January - 3 5-year Review Status Revision in Progress - 13 Reaffirmation in Progress - 26 Cancellation Pending - 1 Cancellation in Progress - 3 No Current Action - 0 Inside This Visit the Technical Standards Program

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "ii compliance standards" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

July 2005 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Recently Published 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 06-28-2005 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 21 Out for Comment - 10 Published in June - 2 5-year Review Status Proposed for Revision-6 Revision in Progress-3

462

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Low Emission Vehicle (LEV) Standards  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (EERE)

Low Emission Vehicle Low Emission Vehicle (LEV) Standards to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Low Emission Vehicle (LEV) Standards on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Low Emission Vehicle (LEV) Standards on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Low Emission Vehicle (LEV) Standards on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Low Emission Vehicle (LEV) Standards on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Low Emission Vehicle (LEV) Standards on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Low Emission Vehicle (LEV) Standards on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Low Emission Vehicle (LEV) Standards California's LEV II exhaust emissions standards apply to Model Year (MY)

463

Physics beyond the standard model  

SciTech Connect

The author briefly summarizes the prospects for extending the understanding of physics beyond the standard model within the next five years. He interprets ``beyond the standard model'' to mean the physics of electroweak symmetry breaking, including the standard model Higgs boson. The nature of this TeV-scale new physics is perhaps the most crucial question facing high-energy physics, but one should recall (neutrino oscillations) that there is ample evidence for interesting physics in the flavour section too. In the next five years, before the LHC starts operations, the facilities available will be LEP2, HERA and the Fermilab Tevatron. He devotes a bit more time to the Tevatron as it is a new initiative for United Kingdom institutions. The Tevatron schedule now calls for data taking in Run II, using two upgraded detectors, to begin on March 1, 2001, with 2 fb{sup {minus}1} accumulated in the first two years. A nine-month shutdown will follow, to allow new silicon detector layers to be installed, and then running will resume with a goal of accumulating 15 fb{sup {minus}1} (or more) by 2006.

Womersley, J.

2000-01-24T23:59:59.000Z

464

Microsoft Word - FedComplianceCritChecklist.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Balanced Scorecard Balanced Scorecard Federal Compliance Review Criteria Acquisition & Financial Assistance Self-Assessment Checklist Revised: May 2008 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Contract Management Office of Procurement & Assistance Management INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE OF THE CHECKLIST The Procurement Executive of the Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for establishing an effective acquisition and financial assistance management system which ensures that quality goods and services are obtained at reasonable prices, in a timely fashion, and in accordance with the statutory and regulatory requirements and the programmatic needs of the agency. To assist in the accomplishment of this responsibility, the Procurement Executive has established the

465

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Recipien, ..ounty of Westmoreland, PA ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Energy Efficiency & Conservation Programs for Buildings & Facilities All County Building Energy Audits A9 Energy Efficiency Retrofits B5.1 Waste Stream, Engineering, and Historical Preservation clauses. Energy Efficiency & Conservation Strategy A9, All, B5.1 Allowable: Any administrative actions/audits associated with this activity Prohibited: Any implantation of projects/construction activities without NEPA approval from DOE Renewable Energy Technologies on Government Buildings B5.1 Allowable: Any administrative actions/audits

466

Capitalizing on information technology to reduce environmental compliance costs  

SciTech Connect

Over the last several years environmental regulations have proliferated at a pace similar to the explosive growth of micro-computing. The new desktop computing power has encouraged compliance solutions developed in-house using PC based database tools. The result has often been numerous internally developed applications scattered throughout the company, managed or supported by personnel unfamiliar with the underlying principles of the original software. Each individual database may contain redundant and sometimes conflicting data. Expertise on these systems is often not transferable to the next system and may be lost as staff is promoted, transferred, or downsized.

Schott, J. [Entergy Services, Beaumont, TX (United States); Gloski, D.M.; Manning, L.A. [Electric Software Products, Inc., Los Altos, CA (United States)

1996-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

467

US costs of verification and compliance under pending arms treaties  

SciTech Connect

The study examines the costs to the United States of compliance and verification associated with four new arms control treaties and one arms agreement. All five of these major accords are in advanced stages of negotiation or ratification. The five accords are: a Strategic Arms Reductions Talks (START) treaty; a Conventional Forces in Europe (CFE) treaty; a Threshold Test Ban Treaty (TTBT); a Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty (PNET); and a Chemical Weapons Agreement (CWA). The cost estimates in the study are based on information about the status of the accords as of the summer of 1990.

O'Hanlon, M.

1990-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

468

Nucleic Acid Standards - Standard Ref. Frame  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Standard Reference Standard Reference Standard Reference Frame Supplemental Information Ideal Geometries X-PLOR Parameters Valence Geometries RNA Ontology Consortium mmCIF Resources PDBML Resources A Standard Reference Frame for the Description of Nucleic Acid Base-pair Geometry A common point of reference is needed to describe the three-dimensional arrangements of bases and base pairs in nucleic acid structures. [1]. For example, parts of a structure, which appear "normal" according to one computational scheme, may be highly unusual according to another and vice versa. It is thus difficult to carry out comprehensive comparisons of nucleic acid structures and to pinpoint unique conformational features in individual structures. In order to resolve these issues, a group of

469

1998 INEEL National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants - Radionuclides  

SciTech Connect

Under Section 61.94 of Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 61, Subpart H, ''National Emission Standards for Emission of Radionuclides Other Than Radon From Department of Energy Facilities,'' each Department of Energy (DOE) facility must submit an annual report documenting compliance. This report addresses the Section 61.94 reporting requirements for operations at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) for calendar year (CY) 1998. The Idaho Operations Office of the DOE is the primary contract concerning compliance with the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) at the INEEL. For CY 1998, airborne radionuclide emissions from the INEEL operations were calculated to result in a maximum individual dose to a member of the public of 7.92E-03 mrem (7.92E-08 Sievert). This effective dose equivalent (EDE) is well below the 40 CFR 61, Subpart H, regulatory standard of 10 mrem per year (1.0E-04 Sievert per year).

J. W. Tkachyk

1999-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

470

Standards Actions, July 2001  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6-27-2001 6-27-2001 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 42 Out for Comment - 15 Published this Month - 1 5-year Review Status Revision in Progress - 4 Reaffirmation in Progress - 2 Supersedure in Progress - 6 Cancellation Pending - 8 Cancellation in Progress - 2 No Current Action - 35 Inside this issue: DOE Technical Standards Project Initiated 1 DOE Technical Standard Recently Sent for Coordination 1 DOE Technical Standard Recently Published 1 American National Standards Institute 2 American National Standards 3 American Society for Testing and Materials 4 Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. July 2001 Standards Actions DOE Technical Standards Projects Initiated

471

Standards Actions - April 2002  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3-28-2002 3-28-2002 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 44 Out for Comment - 13 Published this Month - 2 5-year Review Status Revision in Progress - 4 Reaffirmation in Progress - 2 Supersedure in Progress - 6 Cancellation Pending - 8 Cancellation in Progress - 2 No Current Action - 35 Inside this issue: DOE Technical Standards Project Canceled 1 DOE Technical Standard Recently Sent for Coordination 1 DOE Technical Standards Re- cently Published 2 American National Standards Institute 2 American Society for Testing and Materials International 4 Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. Standards Actions- April 2002 Standards Actions DOE Technical Standards Project Canceled

472

February 2005 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Technical Standards Program Document Status 1-18-2005 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 25 Out for Comment - 10 Published in January - 3 5-year Review Status Proposed for Revision-6 Revision in Progress-4 Proposed for Reaffirmation-3 Reaffirmation in Progress-21 Cancellation Pending-16 Cancellation in Progress-0 Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/ February 2005 Standards Actions 1.0 DOE Standards Actions The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) web page at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. To access these standards, go to our web page, click on "DOE Technical Standards," then choose Projects,

473

July 2006 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Technical DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 06-28-2006 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 23 Out for Comment - 14 Published in June - 0 5-year Review Status Proposed for Revision-5 Revision in Progress-6 Proposed for Reaffirmation-1 Reaffirmation in Progress-21 Cancellation Pending-9 Cancellation in Progress-0 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.eh.doe.gov/ techstds/ July 2006 Standards Actions 1.0 DOE Standards Actions The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) web page at http://www.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. To access these standards, go to our web page, click on "DOE Technical Standards," then choose Projects,

474

January 2012 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

* DOE Conduct of Operations Standards Revisions * New DOE Standards Projects * DOE Handbook of Operational Safety and Analysis Techniques * Nuclear Safety- Related Standards Activity INSIDE THIS ISSUE January 2012 Standards Actions Technical Standards Program Newsletter www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ DOE Conduct of Operations Standards Revisions In the early 1990s, the Department of Energy (DOE) developed 17 technical standards to support DOE Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities. The standards (STDs), listed below, provided examples, good practices, and expanded explanations of the topics in each chapter of the Order. In June 2010, the Order was revised and issued as DOE Order 422.1, Conduct of Operations. The

475

Detailed Information Standard  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The purpose of this standard is to increase the required information that must accompany any parts submitted to the Registry of Standard Biological Parts. This will give users of the parts better assurance of their ...

Culviner, Peter

2010-12-05T23:59:59.000Z

476

Clothing Quality Standards  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Clothing construction is a creative skill with certain standards for appearance and construction. This publication describes the standards that apply to general construction techniques such as preparing the fabric, creating darts and gathers...

2006-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

477

MODEL CONSERVATION STANDARD INTRODUCTION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS The region should acquire all electric energy conservation measure designed model conservation standards to produce all electricity savings that are cost, architectural styles, and so forth) found in typical buildings constructed before the first standards were

478

Ii1  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

-r -r Ii1 5uitc 79% 955 L%fan~Plu,S.W.. Worhingm. D.C.200242134, 7117-03.87.cdy.43 23 September 1987 Mr. Andrew Wallo, III, NE-23 Division of Facility & Site Decommissioning Projects U.S. Department of Energy Germantown, Maryland 20545 Dear Mr. Wallo: ELIMINATION RECOMMENDATION -- COLLEGES AND UNIVtRSITIES The attached elimination recommendation was prepared in accordance.)l- flL.o* with your suggestion during our meeting on 22 September, The recommendat:on y0.0-02 includes 26 colleges and universities identified.in Enclosure 4 to Aerospace letter subject: Status of Actions - FUSRAP Site List, dated i 27 May 1987; three institutions (Tufts College, University of Virginia, ! and the University of Washington) currently identified on the FUSRAP

479

Instrumentation and Control Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NOT MEASUREMENT NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1162-2013 June 2013 DOE STANDARD INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1162-2013 This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program website at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ ii DOE-STD-1162-2013 APPROVAL The Federal Technical Capability Panel consists of senior U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) managers responsible for overseeing the Federal Technical Capability Program. This Panel is responsible for reviewing and approving the qualification standard for Department-wide

480

Criticality Safety Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-STD-1173-2009 April 2009 DOE STANDARD CRITICALITY SAFETY FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1173-2009 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Page at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ DOE-STD-1173-2009 iii APPROVAL The Federal Technical Capability Panel consists of senior U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) managers responsible for overseeing the Federal Technical Capability Program. This Panel is responsible for reviewing and approving the qualification standard for Department-wide

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "ii compliance standards" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Safeguards and Security Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1-2009 1-2009 May 2009 DOE STANDARD SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1171-2009 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ DOE-STD-1171-2009 iii APPROVAL The Federal Technical Capability Panel consists of senior U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) managers responsible for overseeing the Federal Technical Capability Program. This Panel is responsible for reviewing and approving the qualification standard for Department-wide

482

November 2006 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Published 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 Publication Staff Roster 2 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 10-25-2006 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 23 Out for Comment - 16 Published in September - 0 5-year Review Status Proposed for Revision-5 Revision in Progress-6

483

SORORITY LIFE COMMUNITY STANDARDS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

& FRATERNITY SORORITY LIFE COMMUNITY STANDARDS & GREEK JUDICIAL BOARD HANDBOOK 2013 OFFICE Judicial Board Handbook 2 I. COMMUNITY STANDARDS Fraternity & Sorority Life is one of the most rewarding Councils have standards of conduct for all chapters and their members. It is the responsibilty of every

Hone, James

484

Underground storage tank compliance activities at the Hanford Site  

SciTech Connect

The Hanford Site covers 560 mi{sup 2} of semi-arid land that is owned by the US Government and managed by the US Department of Energy-Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL). It is located in the Columbia Basin and northwest of the City of Richland, Washington, which lies approximately 5 mi from the southernmost portion of the Hanford Site boundary and is the nearest population center. In early 1943, the US Army Corps of Engineers selected the Hanford Site for the production and purification of plutonium. The purpose of this report is fourfold: it describes the underground storage tanks (UST) at the Hanford Site regulated by title 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 280 (EPA 1988a); it defines the compliance programs completed, underway, or planned by the affected Hanford Site contractors; it provides costs of program compliance; and it defines long-range planning to comply with 40 CFR 280 after 1998. 5 refs., 1 fig., 2 tabs.

Morton, M.R.; Mihalic, M.A.

1990-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

485

DOE-STD-1090-2007; Hoisting and Rigging Standard (Formerly Hoisting and Rigging Manual)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

APPENDIX A APPENDIX A PROCUREMENT GUIDELINES A-i Appendix A Procurement Guidelines This appendix provides reference guidance in preparing purchase requisitions for hoisting and rigging materials and equipment. Nationally recognized standards and specifications are referenced for listed items. However, caution should be used prior to procurement of special items in order to verify appropriate specification or standard reference and requirements. Some specific requirements listed in this appendix are more restrictive than consensus standard requirements, but are recommended to ensure materials of adequate quality and workmanship are provided. Quality receipt inspections should be provided for all received materials in order to verify compliance of all

486

EPAct Alternative Fuel Transportation Program: State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleet Compliance Annual Report, Fleet Compliance Results for MY 2009/FY 2010 (Brochure)  

SciTech Connect

This annual report summarizes the compliance results of state and alternative fuel provider fleets covered by the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct) for model year 2009/fiscal year 2010.

Not Available

2010-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

487

April 2004 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 DOE Technical Standards recently sent for coordination 1 DOE Technical Standards Recently Published 1 Non-Government Standards 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 7 American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) 8 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 12 National Fire Protection Association 12 ry DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 03-26-2004 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 37 Out for Comment - 21 Published in March - 2 5-Year Review Status Revision in Progress - 13 Reaffirmation inProgress - 26 Cancellation Pending - 1

488

ACCREDITED STANDARDS COMMITTEE N15 DEVELOPMENTS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS  

SciTech Connect

Accredited Standards Committee (ASC) N15, Methods of Nuclear Material Control, is sponsored by the Institute of Nuclear Materials Management (INMM) to develop standards for protection, control and accounting of special nuclear materials in all phases of the nuclear fuel cycle, including analytical procedures where necessary and special to this purpose, except that physical protection of special nuclear material within a nuclear power plant is not included. Voluntary consensus standards complement federal regulations and technical standards and fulfill an important role for the nuclear regulatory agencies. This paper describes the N15 standards development process, with INMM as the Standards Developing Organization (SDO) and the N15 Committee responsible for implementation. Key components of the N15 standards development process include ANSI accreditation; compliance with the ANSI Essential Requirements (ER), coordination with other SDOs, communication with stakeholders, maintenance of balance between interest categories, and ANSI periodic audits. Recent and future ASC N15 activities are discussed, with a particular focus on new directions in anticipation of renewed growth in nuclear power.

Mathews, Caroline E.; May, Melanie; Preston, Lynne

2009-10-06T23:59:59.000Z

489

Standards Actions - August 2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standards Standards Technical Standards Program Document Status (2000-07-31) (2000-07-31) (2000-07-31) (2000-07-31) (2000-07-31) Activity Summary In Conversion – 4 In Preparation – 32 Out for Comment – 15 Published this Month – 1 5-year Reviews Revisions in Progress – 3 Reaffirmations in Progress – 0 Supersedures in Progress – 6 Cancellations Pending – 8 Cancellations in Progress – 2 No Current Action – 35 Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site: http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/ DOE Technical Standards Project Initiated If you have any questions or are interested in participating in the development of this standard, please contact the person listed below. Complete listings of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status are given in the Web Site referenced at the bottom of this page. To access these

490

April 2008 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3-27-2008 3-27-2008 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 24 Out for Comment - 26 Published in March - 0 Five Year Review status Proposed for Revision-4 Revision in Progress-3 Proposed for Reaffirmation-0 Reaffirmation in Progress-20 Cancellations Pending-6 Cancellations in Progress-0 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclear safety/techstds/ April 2008 Standards Actions 1.0 DOE Standards Actions The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) web page at http://hss.energy.gov/nuclear safetytechstds/. To access these standards, go to our web page, click on "DOE Technical Standards," then choose

491

Appliance Efficiency Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 6 Appliance Efficiency Standards Part 2 of 2: Policy process and consumer gains Part 1 of this article (CBS News, Spring 1995) discussed LBNL's role in setting federal appliance efficiency standards and presented an overview of the net national benefits of standards. Here, we examine the broader policy context for appliance standards and consumer benefits. Policy Context Appliance efficiency standards provide a minimum requirement for energy efficiency at the point of manufacture (or import). These standards seek to overcome market failures-including price distortions and transaction costs-that have historically given rise to a gap between observed and attainable product efficiencies. In this way, appliance standards complement information programs, utility DSM and other incentive programs,

492

July 2007 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6-27-2007 6-27-2007 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 27 Out for Comment - 24 Published in June - 0 5-year Review status Proposed for Revision-5 Revision in Progress-6 Proposed forReaffirmation-1 Reaffirmation in Progress-21 Cancellations Pending-9 Cancellations in Progress-0 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://hss.energy.gov/nuclear safetytechstds/ July 2007 Standards Actions 1.0 DOE Standards Actions The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) web page at http://hss.energy.gov/nuclear safetytechstds/. To access these standards, go to our web page, click on "DOE Technical Standards," then choose

493

IHS Standards Expert  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Standards » Standards » IHS IHS Standards Expert1354608000000IHS Standards ExpertLANL researchers can access IHS Standards from offsite via Remote Access./No/Question? 667-5809library@lanl.gov IHS Standards Expert LANL researchers can access IHS Standards from offsite via Remote Access. Login For each collection (society), one person may access pdfs at a time, per the Library's subscription license. Please free up the collection for another user when finished: download or print your pdf, then Log Out. FAQs How do I use IHS? IHS Basic Tutorial (pdf) - see more on the "Training & Support" tab within IHS Contact IHS Customer support, 800-447-3352 (our Customer Support ID Number is 5926584) Contact the Research Library at 7-5809 or library@lanl.gov What if full-text is not available?

494

OSHA: Standards and Recordkeeping  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

OSHA: Standards & OSHA: Standards & Record keeping Frances E. Humphrey, CRNP, COHN-5/CM DOE Headquarters January 17, 2002 .. DOL Organizational Chart History of OSHA +11/14n8: Lead Standard Published * 5/23/80: Medical & Exposure Records Standard Finalized * 7/2/82: Voluntary Protection Programs (VPP) Created +11/25/83: HazCom Standard Promulgated * 9/1/89: Lockout/Tagout Standard Issued OSHA Mission Statement * "The mission of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration is to save lives, prevent injuries and protect the health of America's workers" {OSHA, 2001) History of OSHA +12/29nO: President Nixon signed Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 * 5129n1: First Standards Adopted * 1/17n2: OSHA Training Institute Established * Nov-Dec 1972: First State Plans Approved

495

Derived Concentration Technical Standard  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

196-2011 196-2011 April 2011 DOE STANDARD DERIVED CONCENTRATION TECHNICAL STANDARD U.S. Department of Energy AREA ENVR Washington, D.C. 20585 Not Measurement Sensitive This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.doe.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/standard/standard.html DOE-STD-1196-2011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Derived Concentration Technical Standard was a collaborative effort sponsored by the DOE Office of Environmental Policy and Assistance, with support from Department subject matter experts (SMEs) in the field of radiation protection. This standard, which complements DOE Order (O) 458.1, Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment, was developed taking

496

Standards Actions, May 2002  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4-29-2002 4-29-2002 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 47 Out for Comment - 12 Published this Month - 6 5-year Review Status Revision in Progress - 10 Reaffirmation in Progress - 12 Supersedure in Progress - 0 Cancellation Pending - 7 Cancellation in Progress - 1 No Current Action - 20 Inside this issue: DOE Technical Standards Proposed for Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Re- cently Published 1 American National Standards Institute 2 American Society for Testing and Materials International 4 Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. Standards Actions- May 2002 Standards Actions DOE Technical Standards Proposed for Reaffirmation The following documents are currently being reevaluated under the 5-year

497

May 2008 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4-25-2008 4-25-2008 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 24 Out for Comment - 26 Published in April - 2 Five Year Review status Proposed for Revision-4 Revision in Progress-3 Proposed for Reaffirmation-0 Reaffirmation in Progress-20 Cancellations Pending-6 Cancellations in Progress-0 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclear safety/techstds/ May 2008 Standards Actions 1.0 DOE Standards Actions The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) web page at http://hss.energy.gov/nuclear safetytechstds/. To access these standards, go to our web page, click on "DOE Technical Standards," then choose

498

Standards Actions - August 2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standards Standards Technical Standards Program Document Status (2000-07-31) (2000-07-31) (2000-07-31) (2000-07-31) (2000-07-31) Activity Summary In Conversion – 4 In Preparation – 32 Out for Comment – 15 Published this Month – 1 5-year Reviews Revisions in Progress – 3 Reaffirmations in Progress – 0 Supersedures in Progress – 6 Cancellations Pending – 8 Cancellations in Progress – 2 No Current Action – 35 Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site: http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/ DOE Technical Standards Project Initiated If you have any questions or are interested in participating in the development of this standard, please contact the person listed below. Complete listings of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status are given in the Web Site referenced at the bottom of this page. To access these

499

3-1 2001 SITE ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT CHAPTER 3: COMPLIANCE STATUS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

3-1 2001 SITE ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT CHAPTER 3: COMPLIANCE STATUS Brookhaven National Laboratory Department of Environmental Conservation. Ten reportable spills of petroleum products occurred on site items. 2001 SITE ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT Compliance Status B R O O K H A V E N N A T I O N A L L A B O R

Homes, Christopher C.

500

Mechanical Compliance Control System for A Pneumatic Robot Arm Kouichi Watanabe1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

- 2789 - Mechanical Compliance Control System for A Pneumatic Robot Arm Kouichi Watanabe1 , Hisashi position and posture of the arm. Keywords: Pneumatic actuator, Humanoid robot arm, Compliance control 1 actuators have started gaining attention as robot actuators. We focused on the robot arm using a pneumatic

Tachi, Susumu