Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "helium-48 cfr subpart" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Title 40 CFR Part 191 Subparts B and C  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Isolation Pilot Plant Waste Characterization (40 CFR § 194.24) United States Department of Energy Waste.S. Department of Energy 1995a) and two additional baseline reports, Transuranic Waste Baseline Inventory ReportTitle 40 CFR Part 191 Subparts B and C Compliance Recertification Application for the Waste

2

Title 40 CFR Part 191 Subparts B and C  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

...............................................................................................................46-2 DOE/WIPP-09-3424 Section 46-200946-iii #12;Title 40 CFR Part 191 Subparts B and C Compliance Recertification Application 2009 This page intentionally left blank. DOE/WIPP-09-3424 Section 46-200946-iv #12 WIPP Waste Isolation Pilot Plant DOE/WIPP-09-3424 Section 46-200946-v #12;Title 40 CFR Part 191

3

Title 40 CFR Part 191 Subparts B and C  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

......................................................................................................................45-3 DOE/WIPP-09-3424 Section 45-200945-iii #12;Title 40 CFR Part 191 Subparts B and C Compliance Recertification Application 2009 This page intentionally left blank. DOE/WIPP-09-3424 Section 45-200945-iv #12 assessment WIPP Waste Isolation Pilot Plant DOE/WIPP-09-3424 Section 45-200945-v #12;Title 40 CFR Part 191

4

Title 40 CFR Part 191 Subparts B and C  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

...............................................................................................................41-3 DOE/WIPP-09-3424 Section 41-200941-iii #12;Title 40 CFR Part 191 Subparts B and C Compliance Recertification Application 2009 This page intentionally left blank. DOE/WIPP-09-3424 Section 41-200941-iv #12.S. Environmental Protection Agency PA performance assessment WIPP Waste Isolation Pilot Plant DOE/WIPP-09

5

Order Module--SAFETY SOFTWARE GUIDE FOR USE WITH 10 CFR 830, SUBPART A,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SAFETY SOFTWARE GUIDE FOR USE WITH 10 CFR 830, SAFETY SOFTWARE GUIDE FOR USE WITH 10 CFR 830, SUBPART A, QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS, AND DOE O 414.1C, QUALITY ASSURANCE Order Module--SAFETY SOFTWARE GUIDE FOR USE WITH 10 CFR 830, SUBPART A, QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS, AND DOE O 414.1C, QUALITY ASSURANCE According to DOE-STD-1146-2007, General Technical Base Qualification Standard, this module was to summarize the quality assurance information found in attachments 3, 4, and 5, of DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance, and its supporting guides, DOE G 414.1-3, Suspect/Counterfeit Items Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1B, Quality Assurance, DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O

6

10 CFR 835 Subpart A - GEneral Provisions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 28, 2006 November 28, 2006 10 CFR 835 Subpart A - General Provisions § 835.1 Scope. (a) General. The rules in this part establish radiation protection standards, limits, and program requirements for protecting individuals from ionizing radiation resulting from the conduct of DOE activities. (b) Exclusion. Except as discussed in paragraph (c) of this section, the requirements in this part do not apply to: (1) Activities that are regulated through a license by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or a State under an Agreement with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, including activities certified by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission under section 1701 of the Atomic Energy Act; (2) Activities conducted under the authority of the Deputy Administrator for Naval Reactors,

7

DOE G 421.1-2A, Implementation Guide for Use in Developing Documented Safety Analyses to Meet Subpart B of 10 CFR 830  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 830, Subpart B, Safety Basis Requirements, requires the contractor responsible for a Department of Energy (DOE) ...

2011-12-19T23:59:59.000Z

8

INTERPRETATION REGARDING EXEMPTION RELIEF UNDER 10 C.F.R. PART 820, SUBPART E, EXEMPTION RELIEF, AND NON-COMPLIANT DOCUMENTED SAFETY ANALYSES SUBJECT TO 10 C.F.R. PART 830, NUCLEAR SAFETY MANAGEMENT, SUBPART B, SAFETY BASIS REQUIREMENTS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The following document is the Office of General Counsel (GC) interpretation regarding exemption relief pursuant to10 C.F.R. Part 820, Procedural Rules for DOE Nuclear Activities, Subpart E,...

9

DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830 DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance "This Department of Energy (DOE or Department) Guide provides information plus acceptable methods for implementing the safety software quality assurance (SQA) requirements of DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance, dated 6-17-05. DOE O 414.1C requirements supplement the quality assurance program (QAP) requirements of Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 830, Subpart A, Quality Assurance, for DOE nuclear facilities and activities. The safety SQA requirements for DOE, including the National Nuclear Security

11

File:CFR-2011-title36-vol2-part251-subpartB.pdf | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

CFR-2011-title36-vol2-part251-subpartB.pdf CFR-2011-title36-vol2-part251-subpartB.pdf Jump to: navigation, search File File history File usage Metadata File:CFR-2011-title36-vol2-part251-subpartB.pdf Size of this preview: 463 × 599 pixels. Other resolution: 464 × 600 pixels. Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Go! next page → next page → Full resolution ‎(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 229 KB, MIME type: application/pdf, 26 pages) File history Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time. Date/Time Thumbnail Dimensions User Comment current 16:39, 22 August 2013 Thumbnail for version as of 16:39, 22 August 2013 1,275 × 1,650, 26 pages (229 KB) Apalazzo (Talk | contribs) You cannot overwrite this file. Edit this file using an external application (See the setup

12

JM to revise DOE G 414.1-1B, Management and Independent Assessments Guide for Use with 10 CFR, Part 830, Subpart A, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance; DOE M 450.4-1, Integrated Safety Management System Manual; and DOE O 226.1A  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

Management and Independent Assessments Guide for Use with 10 CFR, Part 830, Subpart A, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance; DOE M 450.4-1, Integrated Safety ...

2013-04-18T23:59:59.000Z

13

Title 40 CFR Part 191 Subparts B and C  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

)..........................................................................................15-13 15.6.3.1 WIPP Repository Conditions, Chemistry, and Processes..............................15-13 15.6.4.4 Neutrino Experiments in the WIPP Underground Repository.......................15-16 15.6.5 40 CFR § 194....................................................................................................................15-18 List of Figures Figure 15-1. Monthly Precipitation for the WIPP Site, 1990

14

Title 40 CFR Part 191 Subparts B and C  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Transuranic Waste Inventory Report­2007 (U.S. Department of Energy 2008) was published and provides updated of Energy (DOE). 2004. Title 40 CFR Part 191 Compliance Recertification Application for the Waste Isolation of Energy (DOE). 2006. Transuranic Waste Baseline Inventory Report­2004. DOE/TRU 2006-3344. Carlsbad, NM

15

Title 40 CFR Part 191 Subparts B and C  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

at the WIPP (40 CFR § 194.8) United States Department of Energy Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Carlsbad Field (EPA) to approve the disposal of4 transuranic (TRU) waste from U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) waste Waste Characterization Program Implementation Plan (U.S.2 Department of Energy 2003a and 2003b). The EPA

16

Title 40 CFR Part 191 Subparts B and C  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Isolation Pilot Plant Peer Review (40 CFR § 194.27) United States Department of Energy Waste Isolation Pilot Procedure 10.5, Peer Review (U.S. Department of Energy 1996b) to guide all Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP of the waste as a porous medium (U.S. Department of Energy 2003e and 2004b). The DOE developed a new numerical

17

Draft forecast of the final report for the comparison to 40 CFR Part 191, Subpart B, for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The United States Department of Energy is planning to dispose of transuranic wastes, which have been generated by defense programs, at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. The WIPP Project will assess compliance with the requirements of the United States Environmental Protection Agency. This report forecasts the planned 1992 document, Comparison to 40 CFR, Part 191, Subpart B, for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). 130 refs., 36 figs., 11 tabs.

Bertram-Howery, S.G.; Marietta, M.G.; Anderson, D.R.; Gomez, L.S.; Rechard, R.P. (Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (USA)); Brinster, K.F.; Guzowski, R.V. (Science Applications International Corp., Albuquerque, NM (USA))

1989-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

18

Implementing 10 CFR Part 830 Subpart B at WIPP  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Implementation of Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations Part 830, Subpart B Nuclear Safety Management (1) was accomplished at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in a timely and efficient manner. The primary reason the transition went smoothly was that the existing safety analysis was relatively new, initially developed in 1995, and written in accordance with the safe harbor document DOE-STD-3009 (2). The WIPP Safety Analysis Report (SAR) (3) is kept up-to-date with the unreviewed safety question (USQ) process and thorough oversight and input provided by DOE-Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) documented in the annual safety evaluation report (SER) process.

McCormick, J.; Ortiz, C.; Carter, M.; Niemi, B.; Farrell, R.

2002-02-26T23:59:59.000Z

19

Preliminary comparison with 40 CFR Part 191, Subpart B for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, December 1990  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) is planned as the first mined geologic repository for transuranic (TRU) wastes generated by defense programs of the United States Department of Energy (DOE). Before disposing of waste at the WIPP, the DOE must evaluate compliance with the United states Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Standard, Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Management and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level and Transuranic Radioactive Wastes (40 CFR Part 191, US EPA, 1985). Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) is evaluating long-term performance against criteria in Subpart B of the Standard. Performance assessment'' as used in this report includes analyses for the Containment Requirements ({section} 191.13(a)) and the Individual Protection Requirements ({section} 191.15). Because proving predictions about future human actions or natural events is not possible, the EPA expects compliance to be determined on the basis of specified quantitative analyses and informed, qualitative judgment. The goal of the WIPP performance-assessment team at SNL is to provide as detailed and thorough a basis as practical for the quantitative aspects of that decision. This report summarizes SNL's late-1990 understanding of the WIPP Project's ability to evaluate compliance with Subpart B. 245 refs., 88 figs., 23 tabs.

Bertram-Howery, S.G.; Marietta, M.G.; Rechard, R.P.; Anderson, D.R. (Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (USA)); Swift, P.N. (Tech. Reps., Inc., Albuquerque, NM (USA)); Baker, B.L. (Technadyne Engineering Consultants, Inc., Albuquerque, NM (USA)); Bean, J.E. Jr.; McCurley, R.D.; Rudeen, D.K. (New Mexico Engineering Research Inst., Albuquerque, NM (USA)); Beyeler, W.; Brinster, K.F.; Guzowski, R.V.; Sch

1990-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

20

Preliminary performance assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, December 1992. Volume 1, Third comparison with 40 CFR 191, Subpart B  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Before disposing of transuranic radioactive wastes in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), the United States Department of Energy (DOE) must evaluate compliance with applicable long-term regulations of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Sandia National Laboratories is conducting iterative performance assessments of the WIPP for the DOE to provide interim guidance while preparing for final compliance evaluations. This volume contains an overview of WIPP performance assessment and a preliminary comparison with the long-term requirements of the Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Management and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level and Transuranic Radioactive Wastes (40 CFR 191, Subpart B).

Not Available

1992-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "helium-48 cfr subpart" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

10 C.F.R. PART 835-OCCUPATIONAL RADIATION PROTECTION, Subpart...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

835-OCCUPATIONAL RADIATION PROTECTION Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2201; 7191. Source: 58 FR 65485, Dec. 14, 1993, unless otherwise noted. Subpart A-General Provisions 835.1 Scope. (a)...

22

INTERPRETATION REGARDING EXEMPTION RELIEF UNDER 10 C.F.R. PART...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

RELIEF, AND NON-COMPLIANT 'DOCUMENTED SAFETY ANALYSES' SUBJECT TO 10 C.F.R. PART 830, NUCLEAR SAFETY MANAGEMENT, SUBPART B, SAFETY BASIS REQUIREMENTS INTERPRETATION REGARDING...

23

Tank exhaust comparison with 40 CFR 61.93, Subpart H, and other referenced guidelines for Tank Farms National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutant (NESHAP) designated stacks  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgated National Emission Standards other than Radon from US Department of Energy (DOE) Facilities (40 CFR 61, Subpart H) on December 15, 1989. The regulations specify procedures, equipment, and test methods that.are to be used to measure radionuclide emissions from exhaust stacks that are designated as National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutant (NESHAP) stacks. Designated NESHAP stacks are those that have the potential to cause any member of the public to receive an effective dose equivalent (EDE) greater than or equal to 0.1 mrem/year, assuming all emission controls were removed. Tank Farms currently has 33 exhaust stacks, 15 of which are designated NESHAP stacks. This document assesses the compliance status of the monitoring and sampling systems for the designated NESHAP stacks.

Bachand, D.D.; Crummel, G.M.

1994-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

24

Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Site Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Monitoring Plan - 40 CFR 98  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Monitoring Plan is to meet the monitoring plan requirements of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 98.3(g)(5). This GHG Monitoring Plan identifies procedures and methodologies used at the Idaho National Laboratory Site (INL Site) to collect data used for GHG emissions calculations and reporting requirements from stationary combustion and other regulated sources in accordance with 40 CFR 98, Subparts A and other applicable subparts. INL Site Contractors determined subpart applicability through the use of a checklist (Appendix A). Each facility/contractor reviews operations to determine which subparts are applicable and the results are compiled to determine which subparts are applicable to the INL Site. This plan is applicable to the 40 CFR 98-regulated activities managed by the INL Site contractors: Idaho National Laboratory (INL), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP), Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), and Naval Reactors Facilities (NRF).

Deborah L. Layton; Kimberly Frerichs

2010-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

25

Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Site Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Monitoring Plan - 40 CFR 98  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Monitoring Plan is to meet the monitoring plan requirements of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 98.3(g)(5). This GHG Monitoring Plan identifies procedures and methodologies used at the Idaho National Laboratory Site (INL Site) to collect data used for GHG emissions calculations and reporting requirements from stationary combustion and other regulated sources in accordance with 40 CFR 98, Subparts A and other applicable subparts. INL Site Contractors determined subpart applicability through the use of a checklist (Appendix A). Each facility/contractor reviews operations to determine which subparts are applicable and the results are compiled to determine which subparts are applicable to the INL Site. This plan is applicable to the 40 CFR 98-regulated activities managed by the INL Site contractors: Idaho National Laboratory (INL), Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP), Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP), and Naval Reactors Facilities (NRF).

Deborah L. Layton; Kimberly Frerichs

2011-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

26

NESHAP Subpart W Activities Reid J. Rosnick  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

uranium mines include: · Applies to 10,000 tons/yr ore production, or 100,000 tons/mine lifetime · Ambient 27, 2010 Uranium Recovery Workshop 2010 #12;2 Overview EPA regulatory requirements for operating uranium mill tailings (Subpart W) General requirements applicable to Subpart W Status Update on Subpart W

27

DOE G 414.1-1B: Management and Assessments Guide for Use with 10 CFR Part  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE G 414.1-1B: Management and Assessments Guide for Use with 10 DOE G 414.1-1B: Management and Assessments Guide for Use with 10 CFR Part 830, Subpart A, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance; DOE M 450.4-1, Integrated Safety Management System Manual; and DOE O 226.1A, Implementation of Department of Energy Oversight Po DOE G 414.1-1B: Management and Assessments Guide for Use with 10 CFR Part 830, Subpart A, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance; DOE M 450.4-1, Integrated Safety Management System Manual; and DOE O 226.1A, Implementation of Department of Energy Oversight Po "DOE and its contractors are required to perform management and independent assessments in accordance with: * Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 830, Subpart A, "Quality Assurance Requirements"; * DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance;

28

DOE G 414.1-1B: Management and Assessments Guide for Use with 10 CFR Part  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE G 414.1-1B: Management and Assessments Guide for Use with 10 DOE G 414.1-1B: Management and Assessments Guide for Use with 10 CFR Part 830, Subpart A, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance; DOE M 450.4-1, Integrated Safety Management System Manual; and DOE O 226.1A, Implementation of Department of Energy Oversight Po DOE G 414.1-1B: Management and Assessments Guide for Use with 10 CFR Part 830, Subpart A, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance; DOE M 450.4-1, Integrated Safety Management System Manual; and DOE O 226.1A, Implementation of Department of Energy Oversight Po "DOE and its contractors are required to perform management and independent assessments in accordance with: * Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 830, Subpart A, "Quality Assurance Requirements"; * DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance;

29

SUBPART B - Exception Regulations | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SUBPART B - Exception Regulations SUBPART B - Exception Regulations SUBPART B - Exception Regulations SUBPART B--EXCEPTIONS Sec. 1003.20 Purpose and scope. (a) This subpart establishes the procedures for applying for an exception, as provided for in § 504 (42 U.S.C. 7194) of the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.), from a rule, regulation or DOE action having the effect of a rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 551(4), based on an assertion of serious hardship, gross inequity or unfair distribution of burdens, and for the consideration of such application by the OHA. The procedures contained in this subpart may be incorporated by reference in another DOE rule or regulation which invokes the adjudicatory authority of the Office of Hearings and Appeals. The procedures may also be made

30

NESHAP Subpart W Activities Reid J. Rosnick  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of uranium from any ore processed primarily for its source material content. Ore bodies depleted by uranium;2 Overview General requirements applicable to Subpart W EPA regulatory requirements for operating uranium;4 EPA Regulatory Requirements for Operating Uranium Mill Tailings (Subpart W) #12;5 EPA Regulatory

31

NESHAP Subpart W Activities Reid J. Rosnick  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

or depleted uranium" (Available at: #12; Page 10 http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp150.html EPA Review of Standards for Uranium and Thorium Milling Facilities @ 40 CFR Parts 61 of EPA standards for Uranium and Thorium Milling Facilities @ 40 CFR Parts 61 and 192. I have been

32

Standard format and content acceptance criteria for the Material Control and Accounting (MC and A) Reform Amendment: 10 CFR Part 74, Subpart E. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

In 1987 the NRC revised the material control and accounting requirements for NRC licensees authorized to possess and use a formula quantity (i.e., 5 formula kilograms or more) of strategic special nuclear material. Those revisions issued as 10 CFR 74.51-59 require timely monitoring of in-process inventory and discrete items to detect anomalies potentially indicative of material losses. Timely detection and enhanced loss localization capabilities are beneficial to alarm resolution and also for material recovery in the event of an actual loss. NUREG-1280 was issued in 1987 to present criteria that could be used by applicants, licensees, and NRC license reviewers in the initial preparation and subsequent review of fundamental nuclear material control (FNMC) plans submitted in response to the Reform Amendment. This document is also intended for both licensees and license reviewers with respect to FNMC plan revisions. General performance objectives, system capabilities, process monitoring, item monitoring, alarm resolution, quality assurance, and accounting are addressed. This revision to NUREG-1280 is an expansion of the initial edition, which clarifies and expands upon several topics and addresses issues identified under Reform Amendment implementation experience.

NONE

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

33

10 C.F.R. 851: Worker Safety and Health Program | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

51: Worker Safety and Health Program 51: Worker Safety and Health Program 10 C.F.R. 851: Worker Safety and Health Program Stakeholders: DOE contractors; Employee(s) of DOE contractors Scope: 10 C.F.R. 851 outlines the requirements for a worker safety/health program to ensure that DOE contractors and their workers operate a safe workplace. Additionally, 10 C.F.R. 851 establishes procedures for investigating whether a violation of a requirement of this part has occurred, for determining the nature and extent of any such violation, and for imposing an appropriate remedy. Summary: Subpart A - General Provisions: Compliance Order: 10 C.F.R. § 851.4 The Secretary of Energy may issue a Compliance Order to any DOE contractor which: Identifies violations of enumerated requirements Mandates a remedy to address these violations and;

34

MENTAL POLICY ACT IMPLE- MENTING PROCEDURES Subpart A-General  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Department of Energy § 1021.102 PART 1021-NATIONAL ENVIRON- MENTAL POLICY ACT IMPLE- MENTING PROCEDURES Subpart A-General Sec. 1021.100 Purpose. 1021.101 Policy. 1021.102 Applicability. 1021.103 Adoption of CEQ NEPA regulations. 1021.104 Definitions. 1021.105 Oversight of Agency NEPA activi- ties. Subpart B-DOE Decisionmaking 1021.200 DOE planning. 1021.210 DOE decisionmaking. 1021.211 Interim actions: Limitations on ac- tions during the NEPA process. 1021.212 Research, development, demonstra- tion, and testing. 1021.213 Rulemaking. 1021.214 Adjudicatory proceedings. 1021.215 Applicant process. 1021.216 Procurement, financial assistance, and joint ventures. Subpart C-Implementing Procedures 1021.300 General requirements. 1021.301 Agency review and public participa-

35

Final Report History and Basis of NESHAPs and Subpart W  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

studies of phosphogypsum stacks to see if a standard was needed. In December of 1984, the District Court phosphogypsum stacks and radon from DOE facilities. The subsequent reconsideration became know converted to risks. Of the NESHAPs promulgated in 1989, those for Phosphogypsum Stacks (Subpart R), Radon

36

Enforcement Action - EA 2004-07  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

noncompliances under 10 CFR 830, Subpart A, "Quality Assurance Requirements," and 10 CFR 835 "Occupational Radiation Protection" have occurred as described in the attached...

37

41 CFR Public Contracts and Property Management  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

CFR Public Contracts and Property Management CFR Public Contracts and Property Management http://www.41cfr.info/[8/19/2011 3:01:42 PM] CFR TITLES Go to a CFR Title: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 PRINT EDITIONS The Code of Federal Regulations 1 CFR General Provisions 2 CFR Grants and Agreements 3 CFR The President 4 CFR Accounts 5 CFR Administrative Personnel 6 CFR Domestic Security 7 CFR Agriculture 8 CFR Aliens and Nationality 9 CFR Animal and Products 10 CFR Energy 11 CFR Federal Elections 12 CFR Banks and Banking 13 CFR Business and Credit Assistance 14 CFR Aeronautics and Space 15 CFR Commerce and Foreign T 16 CFR Commercial Practices

38

DOE Order Self Study Modules - 10 CFR 830 Safety Basis Documentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Orders Orders Self-Study Program Safety Basis Documentation 10 CFR 830, NUCLEAR SAFETY MANAGEMENT DOE G 421.1-2, IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE FOR USE IN DEVELOPING DOCUMENTED SAFETY ANALYSES TO MEET SUBPART B OF 10 CFR 830 DOE G 423.1.1, IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE FOR USE IN DEVELOPING TECHNICAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS DOE G 424.1-1, IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE FOR USE IN ADDRESSING UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION REQUIREMENTS DOE-STD-1104-96, REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NUCLEAR FACILITY SAFETY BASIS DOCUMENTS (DOCUMENTED SAFETY ANALYSES AND TECHNICAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS) NNSA SERVICE CENTER Change No: 0 Safety Basis Documents Level: Familiar Date: 10/15/03 1 SAFETY BASIS DOCUMENTS FAMILIAR LEVEL OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources listed below, you will be able to:

39

10 C.F.R. 708: DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program | Department of  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

708: DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program 708: DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program 10 C.F.R. 708: DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program Stakeholders: Employee(s) of DOE contractor(s) Scope: 10 C.F.R. 708 establishes criteria and procedures for the investigation, hearing, and review of allegations from DOE contractor employees of employer reprisal resulting from employee disclosure of information to DOE, to members of Congress, or to the contractor; employee participation in proceedings before Congress or pursuant to this subpart; or employee refusal to engage in illegal or dangerous activities, when such disclosure, participation, or refusal pertains to employer practices which the employee believes to be unsafe; to violate laws, rules, or regulations; or to involve fraud, mismanagement, waste, or abuse.

40

ESH100.2.ENV.17  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

10 CFR 830, Attachment 1, Subpart A - Nuclear Safety Management Quality Assurance. 10 CFR 835, Occupational Radiation Protection. 10 CFR 851.26(a)(1), Worker Safety and Health...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "helium-48 cfr subpart" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Title 40 CFR Part 191 Subparts B and C  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

-2009............................................................................EXECSUM-4 DOE/WIPP-09 Application 2009 This page intentionally left blank. DOE/WIPP-09-3424 EXECSUM-iv Executive Summary-2009 #12 Baseline Calculation T fields transmissivity fields TRU transuranic RH Remote-Handled WIPP Waste Isolation

42

Two Approaches to Reactor Decommissioning: 10 CFR Part 50 License Termination and License Amendment, Lessons Learned from the Regulatory Perspective  

SciTech Connect

Trojan Nuclear Plant (Trojan) and Maine Yankee Nuclear Plant (Maine Yankee) were the first two power reactors to complete decommissioning under the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) License Termination Rule (LTR), 10 CFR Part 20, Subpart E. The respective owners' decisions to decommission the sites resulted in different approaches to both the physical aspects of the decommissioning, and the approach for obtaining approval for completing the decommissioning in accordance with regulations. Being in different States, the two single-unit pressurized water reactor sites had different State requirements and levels of public interest that impacted the decommissioning approaches. This resulted in significant differences in decommissioning planning, conduct of decommissioning operations, volumes of low- level radioactive waste disposed, and the final status survey (FSS) program. While both licensees have Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations (ISFSIs), Trojan obtained a separate license for the ISFSI in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 72 and terminated their 10 CFR Part 50 license. Maine Yankee elected to obtain a general license under 10 CFR Part 50 for the ISFSI and reduce the physical site footprint to the ISFSI through a series of license amendments. While the NRC regulations are flexible and allow different approaches to ISFSI licensing there are separate licensing requirements that must be addressed. In 10 CFR 50.82, the NRC mandates public participation in the decommissioning process. For Maine Yankee, public input resulted in the licensee entering into an agreement with a concerned citizen group and resulted in State legislation that significantly lowered the dose limit below the NRC radiological criteria of 25 mrem (0.25 mSv) per year (yr) in 10 CFR 20.1402 for unrestricted use. The lowering of the radiological criteria resulted in a significant dose modeling effort using site-specific Derived Concentrations Guideline Levels (DCGLs) that were well below the NRC DCGL screening values. This contributed to a longer than anticipated period to obtain NRC approval of the Maine Yankee License Termination Plan (LTP). By employing the lessons learned from its first LTP submittal, which was not accepted by the NRC staff, Trojan was able to obtain approval of its revised LTP promptly. While both licensees provided final status survey reports (FSSRs) for NRC approval, the Trojan approach to decommissioning and data management allowed NRC to efficiently review FSS records and supporting documentation. Therefore, NRC was able to review Trojan's FSSR more efficiently than Maine Yankee's FSSR. This paper describes the regulatory impacts of the two different approaches to the decommissioning, the development of licensee required plans, decommissioning operations and records, the differences in licensing processes, and the lessons learned for improving the processes. (authors)

Watson, B.A.; Buckley, J.T.; Craig, C.M. [U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards, Decommissioning Directorate (T7E18), Washington, D.C. 20555 (United States)

2006-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

43

Microsoft Word - FAA Augspurger CX.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Memorandum James Hall Project Manager - TPC-TPP-4 Proposed Action: Augspurger Radio Tower Replacement Project Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part...

44

NEPA ID# WIP:95:0002  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

contained in 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart H and to document compliance with the Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for the Management and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel,...

45

Microsoft Word - Appendix D fly sheet.doc  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Emission Standards for Emissions of Radionuclides Other than Radon from Department of Energy Facilities (40 CFR Part 61, Subpart H) limit exposure to the maximally exposed...

46

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and compliance regulations for certain equipment, including motors and transformers. See 10 CFR part 431, subparts B, K, U, and V; See, e.g., 10 CFR 431.385(b) (''If a...

47

Enforcement Action - EA-2005-05  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Based on further evaluation of the deficiencies, DOE has concluded that violations of 10 CFR 835 and 10 CFR 830 Subpart A have taken place. Accordingly, DOE is issuing this...

48

Rule 10 CFR 835 and Amendments  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Training Radiological Control Coordinating Committee Health and Safety HSS Logo Rule 10 CFR 835 and Amendments 4132011 amendment and complete text of 10 CFR 835 (Word) and...

49

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL INTERPRETATION REGARDING EXEMPTION RELIEF PURSUANT TO  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

INTERPRETATION REGARDING EXEMPTION RELIEF PURSUANT TO 10 C.F.R. PART 820, PROCEDURAL RULES FOR DOE NUCLEAR ACTIVITIES, SUBPART E, EXEMPTION RELIEF, AND NON-COMPLIANT "DOCUMENTED SAFETY ANALYSES" SUBJECT TO 10 C.F.R. PART 830, NUCLEAR SAFETY MANAGEMENT, SUBPART B, SAFETY BASIS REQUIREMENTS Subpart D to 10 C.F.R Part 820 provides that the Department of Energy's (DOE) General Counsel (GC) shall be responsible for interpreting the DOE Nuclear Safety Requirements. Pursuant to that authority, the GC here responds to two questions received regarding contractor compliance with safety basis requirements: 1. Does 10 C.F.R. Part 820, Procedural Rules for DOE Nuclear Activities, allow

50

GUIDANCE ON IMPLEMENTING RADIONUCLIDE NESHAPS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

- Radionuclide Emissions Other than Radon from DOE Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.2.2 Subpart I - NRC Licensed and Non-DOE Federal Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.3 NESHAPS Subpart I . . . . 44 3.2 Other NRC Licensees - 40 CFR 61 Subpart I . . . . . . 44 3.3 DOE Facilities

51

10 CFR 1021 -- Department of Energy: National Environmental Policy...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

10 CFR 1021 -- Department of Energy: National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures 10 CFR 1021 -- Department of Energy: National Environmental Policy Act Implementing...

52

Title 40 CFR Part 191 Subparts B and C Compliance Recertification Application 2004 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

OF KARST AT THE WIPP SITE U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Office of Radiation and Indoor Air Center ............................................................................................5 4.0 Methods for Detecting Karst at the WIPP Site.........................................................11 4.1.3 Models of the WIPP Site

53

Subpart 52  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

TABLE OF CONTENTS Notice: Clauses incorporated by reference. I-1 FAR CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE ................................................1 I-2 DEAR CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE .............................................5 Notice II: Clauses incorporated in full text. I-3 FAR 52.202-1 DEFINITIONS (JUL 2004) (AS MODIFIED BY DEAR 952.202-1) ...7 I-4 FAR 52.209-9 UPDATES OF PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (JAN 2011) ........................................8 I-5 FAR 52.217-9 OPTION TO EXTEND THE TERM OF THE CONTRACT (MAR 2000) .......................................................................................................................8 I-6 FAR 52.223-7 NOTICE OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS (JAN 1997) ...................9

54

Subpart 52  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Note: FAR and/or DEAR clauses specifically required for the construction of UPF will be added during transition. TABLE OF CONTENTS I-1 FAR 52.202-1 DEFINITIONS (JUL 2004) (AS MODIFIED BY DEAR 952.202-1) .. 1 I-2 FAR 52.203-3 GRATUITIES (APR 1984) ...................................................................... 1 I-3 FAR 52.203-5 COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES (APR 1984) .............. 2 I-4 FAR 52.203-6 RESTRICTIONS ON SUBCONTRACTOR SALES TO THE GOVERNMENT (SEP 2006) ........................................................................................... 2 I-5 FAR 52.203-7 ANTI-KICKBACK PROCEDURES (OCT 2010)................................. 3 I-6 FAR 52.203-8 CANCELLATION, RESCISSION, AND RECOVERY OF FUNDS FOR ILLEGAL OR IMPROPER ACTIVITY (JAN 1997) .......................................... 4

55

Microsoft Word - CX-MountainAvenueDispositionFY12_WEB.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Joan Kendall Realty Specialist - TERR-3 Proposed Action: Disposition of Mountain Avenue Substation and Tap Line Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021):...

56

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL INTERPRETATION...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Nuclear Activities, allow DOE to explicitly or implicitly exempt a contractor from a DOE nuclear safety requirement in 10 C.F.R. Part 830, Nuclear Safety Management, Subpart...

57

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

required by Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations Occupational Radiation Protection, (10 CFR 835) Subpart J and as outlined in the DOE standard DOE-STD-1098-99, Radiological...

58

Microsoft Word - CXMemo_5_15_12.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Action: Relocation of Wood Poles on Centralia B Street No. 1 for proposed Centralia City Light May Street Substation Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part...

59

NMMSS News sept 2013.cdr  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

with the provisions of ANSI N15.8-2009 an acceptable approach to meet the material control and accounting requirements in Subpart B of 10 CFR Part 74 at nuclear power...

60

NMMSS News july 2013.cdr  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

with the provisions of ANSI N15.8-2009 an acceptable approach to meet the material control and accounting requirements in Subpart B of 10 CFR Part 74 at nuclear power...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "helium-48 cfr subpart" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

WIPP Documents - Environmental Monitoring  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

issued by the EPA are contained in Title 40 CFR, Part 191, Subpart A. Strategic Plan for Groundwater Monitoring at the WIPP DOEWIPP-03-3230 Describes the groundwater...

62

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Exclusion Determination Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Oil Spill Cleanup under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B5.6 Date: 1215...

63

Microsoft Word - Little Shell Final Draft CX 7-15-2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Little Shell Property funding Fish and Wildlife Project No. and Contract No.: 2002-003-00, BPA-007168 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B1.25...

64

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Building and Equipment Instrumentation under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B2.2 Date: 12052012...

65

Microsoft Word - McNary_ShuntCapAddition_CX.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Memorandum Charla M. Burke Project Manager, TEP-TPP-1 Proposed Action: McNary Substation Shunt Capacitor Addition Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R....

66

Test Procedure for 170.304 e Clinical Decision Support APPROVED Version 1.1 September 24, 2010  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

; and laboratory test results. 1 Department of Health and Human Services, 45 CFR Part 170 Health Information in 45 CFR Part 170 Subpart C of the Final Rule for Health Information Technology: Initial Set of standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria for Electronic Health Record Technology

67

Test Procedure for 170.306.a Computerized Provider Order Entry APPROVED Version 1.1 September 24, 2010  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

) Laboratory; and (3) Radiology/Imaging 1 Department of Health and Human Services, 45 CFR Part 170 Health criteria defined in 45 CFR Part 170 Subpart C of the Final Rule for Health Information Technology: Initial Set of standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria for Electronic Health

68

Test Procedure for 170.304.a Computerized Provider Order Entry APPROVED Version 1.1 September 24, 2010  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

) Laboratory; and (3) Radiology/imaging 1 Department of Health and Human Services, 45 CFR Part 170 Health criteria defined in 45 CFR Part 170 Subpart C of the Final Rule for Health Information Technology: Initial Set of standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria for Electronic Health

69

Test Procedure for 170.306.c Clinical Decision Support APPROVED Version 1.1 September 24, 2010  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

; and laboratory test results. 1 Department of Health and Human Services, 45 CFR Part 170 Health Information in 45 CFR Part 170 Subpart C of the Final Rule for Health Information Technology: Initial Set of standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria for Electronic Health Record Technology

70

Microsoft Word - Requirements_list.docx  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

SELECTED LIST OF REQUIREMENTS SELECTED LIST OF REQUIREMENTS DESCRIPTION REQUIREMENT APPLICABILITY 1. Federal Motor Carrier Registration 49 CFR 390.19; 390.21 Motor carriers that conduct commercial motor vehicle operations in interstate commerce. 2. Hazardous Materials Safety Permit 49 CFR 385, Subpart E Motor carriers that transport the hazardous materials listed at 49 CFR 385.403. 3. Federal Hazardous Materials Registration 49 CFR 107, Subpart G Offering or transporting a hazardous material listed at 49 CFR 107.601. This list includes hazardous materials requiring placarding. 4. Texas State Motor Carrier Registration 43 TAC, Chap. 18, Subchap. B Motor carriers that conduct commercial motor vehicle operations in Texas. 5. Unified Carrier Registration 49 CFR 367 Motor carriers, motor private carriers, brokers, freight forwarders and leasing companies.

71

Title 40 CFR Part 191 Subparts B and C Compliance Recertification Application 2004 Table of Contents1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

.........................................................................................................................1-27 List of Figures Figure 1-1. Final WIPP CCDF................................................................................................. 1-7 Figure 1-2. WIPP Location in Southeastern New Mexico..................................................... 1-12 Figure 1-3. Methodology for Performance Assessment of the WIPP

72

Title 40 CFR Part 191 Subparts B and C Compliance Recertification Application 2004 Table of Contents1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

waste inventory estimates would change as the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) characterized the contents waste. In 1970, the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission concluded that TRU waste should have greater of Contents1 2 3 4 4.0 WASTE DESCRIPTION

73

Title 40 CFR Part 191 Subparts B and C Compliance Recertification Application 2004 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Team Procedure TRAMPAC TRUPACT-II Authorized Methods for Payload Control TRIPS Transuranic Reporting, Inventory, and Processing System TRU transuranic TRUPACT Transuranic Package Transporter TSG Technical

74

Achieving 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart Cb CO Emission Requirement On Large RDF-Fired Municipal Waste Combustors  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

have been developed, including co-firing with other fuels and fluidized bed combustion. RDF-fired unit cycle. Co-firing RDF with other grate fired solid fuels such as stoker coal or wood chips is another pre combustion methodology for ·CO control. Co-firing with these higher heating value fuels increases furnace

Columbia University

75

Steam Generating Units (duct burners) 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart GG- Standards of Performance for Stationary Gas Turbines  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

For nitrogen oxides has been determined to be selective catalytic reduction. l As authorized by the Northwest Clean Air Agency Regulation Section 300, this order is issued subject to the following restrictions and conditions: 1) The gas turbines shall burn either pipeline natural gas, or number 2 distillate oil with a sulfur content not to exceed 0.05 weight percent. The HRSG duct burners shall burn only pipeline natural gas. 2) Pollutant concentrations for each gas turbinelheat recovery steam generator stack shall not exceed the following:

unknown authors

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

76

10 CFR 835  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

removable surface contamination values for STCs should be 1,000 dpm100 cm 2 . The handbook explains that if surface contamination levels are less than one tenth of the 10 CFR...

77

National Nuclear Security Administration Categorical Exclusion Determination Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Categorical Exclusion Determination Form Categorical Exclusion Determination Form NEPA ID#: Proposed Action Title: Program or Field Office: Location(s) (City/County/State): Proposed Action Description: Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied: For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, including the full text of each categorical exclusion, see Subpart D of 10 CFR Part 1021. Regulatory Requirements in 10 CFR 1021.410(b): (See full text in regulation) The proposal fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or B to 10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart D. To fit within the classes of actions listed in 10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, a proposal must be one that would not: (1) threaten

78

U.S. Department of Energy NEPA Categorical Exclusion Determination Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EE Retrofits EE Retrofits Program OT Field Office: EERE RW EECBG Localion(s) (City/Counly/St8tC): Muskogee County, OK HVAC unit al city hall with a more efficient one. City Hall is not on the historic register. Categorical Exclusjon(s) Appl ied: 85.1 - Actions to conserve energy or water For the complete DOE Nat ional Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, including the full text of each categorical exclusion, see Subpart 0 of 10 CFR Part 1021 . Regulatory Requirements in 10 CFR I02IA10(b): (See full text in regulation) [Z)The proposal fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or B to 10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart D. To fit within the classes of actions listed in 10 CFR Part 1021 , Subpart 0, Appendix B, a proposal must be one that would not: (I) threaten

79

National Nuclear Security Administration Categorical Exclusion Determination Form  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

National Nuclear Security Administration National Nuclear Security Administration Categorical Exclusion Determination Form NEPA ID#: Proposed Action Title: Program or Field Office: Location(s) (City/County/State): Proposed Action Description: Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied: For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, including the full text of each categorical exclusion, see Subpart D of 10 CFR Part 1021. Regulatory Requirements in 10 CFR 1021.410(b): (See full text in regulation) The proposal fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or B to 10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart D. To fit within the classes of actions listed in 10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, a proposal must be one that would not: (1) threaten

80

U.S. Department of Energy NEPA Categorical Exclusion Determination Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Location(s) (City/Counly/SI8Iel:lNest Warwick, Rl panels and new hoi water tanks in two schools, They will also inslall solar streetlights at the school par1Subpart 0 of 10 CFR Pan 1021. Regulatory Requirements in 10 CFR 1 021.410(b): (See full text in regulation) [{]The proposal fits within a class of actions thai is listed in Appendix A or B to 10 CFR Part 1021. Subpart D. To fit within the classes of actions listed in 10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart 0, Appendix B, a proposal must be one that would not: (I) threaten

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "helium-48 cfr subpart" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Sprinkler Head Replacement (4586), 4/24/2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sprinkler Head Replacement Projects (4586) Sprinkler Head Replacement Projects (4586) Program or Field Office: Y-12 Site Office Location(s) (Citv/Countv/State): Oak Ridge, Anderson County, Tennessee Proposed Action Description: The proposed action is to replace approximately 1 ,300 sprinkler heads upgrade fire protection systems. Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied: 81.3- Routine maintenance Submit by E-mail For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, including the full text of each categorical exclusion, see Subpart D of 10 CFR Part 1021. Regulatory Requirements in 10 CFR 1021.410(b): (See full text in regulation) [{Jrhe proposal fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A orB to 10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart D. To fit within the classes of actions listed in 10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, a proposal must be one that would not: (1) threaten

82

10 CFR Part 1017 - Identification and Protection of Unclassified Controlled  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 CFR Part 1017 - Identification and Protection of Unclassified 0 CFR Part 1017 - Identification and Protection of Unclassified Controlled Nuclear Information 10 CFR Part 1017 - Identification and Protection of Unclassified Controlled Nuclear Information 10 CFR Part 1017, Identification and Protection of Unclassified Controlled Nuclear Information - Establishes the Government-wide policies and procedures for implementing the requirements of section 148 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 concerning identifying and protecting certain unclassified but sensitive Government information that concerns atomic energy defense programs. 10 CFR Part 1017, Identification and Protection of Unclassified Controlled Nuclear Information More Documents & Publications Summary, UCNI Document Markings - November 2011 Briefing, For Persons With Access to UCNI - April 2012

83

DOE 10 CFR Part 431 EERE-2010-BT-TP-0036 RIN 1904-AC-38 Submission...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 CFR Part 431 EERE-2010-BT-TP-0036 RIN 1904-AC-38 Submission of Comments by Howe Corporation DOE 10 CFR Part 431 EERE-2010-BT-TP-0036 RIN 1904-AC-38 Submission of Comments by Howe...

84

Patent Rights - Waiver [10 C.F.R. 784.12] | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Rights - Waiver 10 C.F.R. 784.12 Patent Rights - Waiver 10 C.F.R. 784.12 "Invention" means any invention or discovery which is or may be patentable or otherwise protectable...

85

10 C.F.R. 820: Procedural Rules for DOE Nuclear Activities |...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

20: Procedural Rules for DOE Nuclear Activities 10 C.F.R. 820: Procedural Rules for DOE Nuclear Activities Stakeholders: DOE employees Scope: 10 C.F.R. 820 outlines the appropriate...

86

Surveillance Guide - OSS 19.3 Confined Space Entry  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CONFINED SPACE ENTRY CONFINED SPACE ENTRY 1.0 Objective The objective of this surveillance is to ensure that the practices of workers performing activities in confined spaces protect the safety and health of the workers and comply with DOE and OSHA requirements. 2.0 References 2.1 DOE 5480.1B, Environment, Safety and Health Program for Department of Energy Operations 2.2 DOE 5480.4, Environmental Protection, Safety and Health Protection Standards 2.3 29 CFR 1910.120, Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response 2.4 29 CFR 1910.146, Permit-Required Confined Spaces 2.5 29 CFR 1910.147, Control of Hazardous Energy (Lockout/Tagout) 2.6 29 CFR 1910, Subpart I, Personal Protective Equipment 2.7 29 CFR 1910, Subpart Q, Welding, Cutting and Brazing

87

Document ID Number: RL-721 REV4 NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

114, Rev 0 114, Rev 0 I. Project Title: MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Asbestos Removal under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, Bl.l6 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors repair, remove, handle, and dispose of asbestos-containing materials (ACM) in accordance with applicable requirements (40 CFR part 61, "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutantsn; 40 CFR part 763, "Asbestosn; 29 CFR part 1910, subpart I, "Personal Protective Equipmentn; and 29 CFR part 1926, "Safety and Health Regulations for Constructionn; and appropriate state and local

88

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-04, Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.23 and Compliance Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR Subpart C  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enforcement Guidance Supplement Enforcement Guidance Supplement EGS: 00-04 Appendix E- Operational Procedures for Enforcement Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 October 26, 2000 MEMORANDUM FOR: DOE PAAA COORDINATORS CONTRACTOR PAAA COORDINATORS FROM: R. KEITH CHRISTOPHER DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND INVESTIGATION SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-04: Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to

89

10 CFR 851 Improvement Activities | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Outreach & Collaboration » Focus Groups » 10 CFR 851 Outreach & Collaboration » Focus Groups » 10 CFR 851 Worker Safety & Health » 10 CFR 851 Improvement Activities 10 CFR 851 Improvement Activities Meeting Documents Available for Download March 13, 2012 14th Annual Joint DOE/EFCOG Chemical Safety and Worker Safety and Health Program (10 CFR 851) Workshop The purpose of this workshop is to foster continuous improvement of the implementation of 10 CFR 851 by sharing implementation experiences and ideas for enhancements gathered over the nearly 5 years since the rule's date for full implementation. Workshop Dates: March 13-15, 2012 March 7, 2012 United Steel Workers 2012 Health, Safety and Environment Conference Workshop Date: March 7, 2012 Enforcement Guidance Oversight Reporting Security Classification

90

APPLICATION OF A CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the conveyance of four groundwater wells and well pumps the conveyance of four groundwater wells and well pumps from the Department of Energy Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant to the Village of Piketon. The wells, well pumps and related underground piping are located within the X-608 well field on the south bank of the Scioto River within the Village of Piketon, Ohio. Number and Title of the Categorical Exclusions Applied: 10 CFR Part 1021, Appendix B to Subpart D. B1.24 - Property Transfer. The regulatory requirements from 10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart D, Section 410(b) have been met by the proposed action. Determination: The proposed action was reviewed and was determined to fit within the specified class of actions found at 10 CFR 1021, Appendix B to Subpart D. Date CX applied: May 9, 2012

91

10 CFR 707 - Contractor Workplace Substance Abuse Program at DOE Sites |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10 CFR 707 - Contractor Workplace Substance Abuse Program at DOE 10 CFR 707 - Contractor Workplace Substance Abuse Program at DOE Sites 10 CFR 707 - Contractor Workplace Substance Abuse Program at DOE Sites 10 CFR 707, Federal Register, July 22, 1992 Amendment to 10 CFR 707, January 23, 2008 Executive Order 12564 10 CFR 707 Safety Advisory Implementation Assistance Frequently Asked Questions Implementation Dates 10 CFR 707 Public Forums - Video Conference Presentations Rulemaking Request for Information July 30, 2010 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Economic Assessment Questionnaire Policy Memorandum Secretary of Energy's Decision Memorandum Regarding Drug Testing for DOE Positions That Require Access Authorizations, September 14, 2007 Tools Department of Health and Human Services: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's web site link(Click "Federal

92

10 CFR 851 - Worker Safety and Health Program Archives  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Video Windows Media Player Office of Worker Safety and Health Enforcement Health and Safety Home HSS Logo Archives 10 CFR 851: Worker Safety and Health Program Legislation...

93

10 CFR Part 810 | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Nuclear power plant 10 CFR Part 810 Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nonproliferation > Nuclear...

94

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 99-01, Enforcement of 10 CFR...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AND INVESTIGATION SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 99-01: Enforcement of 10 CFR Part 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule) for Facilities below Hazard Category III Section...

95

10 CFR 1008, Records Maintained On Individuals (Privacy Act)...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the Government Through Leadership in Environmental Management Office of Personnel Management, 5 CFR 731 Code of Federal Regulations PROCEDURAL RULES FOR DOE NUCLEAR ACTIVITIES...

96

Guidance & Opinions | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Guidance & Opinions Guidance & Opinions Guidance & Opinions Contractor Relations Guidance on Accessing Contractor and Subcontractor Employment Records Arbitration Guidance for Management and Operating Contractors Guidance on Meetings with Union Officials Political Activity at DOE Facilities and by DOE Contractors Opinion on Contractor Participation in the Federal Hiring Process Guidance on Inherently Governmental Functions Guidance on Electric Vehicle Recharging Stations Safety Regulations Interpretations INTERPRETATION REGARDING EXEMPTION RELIEF UNDER 10 C.F.R. PART 820, SUBPART E, EXEMPTION RELIEF, AND NON-COMPLIANT 'DOCUMENTED SAFETY ANALYSES' SUBJECT TO 10 C.F.R. PART 830, NUCLEAR SAFETY MANAGEMENT, SUBPART B, SAFETY BASIS REQUIREMENTS INTERPRETATION REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARD

97

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-04: Factual Bases for Issuing Consent  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-04: Factual Bases for Issuing Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-04: Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.23 and Compliance Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR Subpart C Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-04: Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.23 and Compliance Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR Subpart C DOE's Operational Procedures for Enforcement (June 1998), which supercede the DOE Enforcement Handbook (1087-95), provides the Office of Enforcement and Investigation with the opportunity to issue interim enforcement guidance from time to time with respect to processes to be used in this Office (see Section 1.3. Interim Enforcement Guidance). In particular, it is important to provide contractors and others with explanations on how certain procedural mechanisms provided in Part 820 are utilized to fulfill

98

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-04: Factual Bases for Issuing Consent  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-04: Factual Bases for Issuing Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-04: Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.23 and Compliance Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR Subpart C Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-04: Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.23 and Compliance Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR Subpart C DOE's Operational Procedures for Enforcement (June 1998), which supercede the DOE Enforcement Handbook (1087-95), provides the Office of Enforcement and Investigation with the opportunity to issue interim enforcement guidance from time to time with respect to processes to be used in this Office (see Section 1.3. Interim Enforcemen Guidance). In particular, it is important to provide contractors and others with explanations on how certain procedural mechanisms provided in Part 820 are utilized to fulfill

99

10 CFR 1021 -- Department of Energy: National Environmental Policy Act  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10 CFR 1021 -- Department of Energy: National Environmental Policy 10 CFR 1021 -- Department of Energy: National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures 10 CFR 1021 -- Department of Energy: National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures The purpose of Part 10 CFR 1021 is to establish procedures that the Department of Energy (DOE) shall use to comply with section 102(2) of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)) and the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508). This part supplements, and is to be used in conjunction with, the CEQ Regulations. It is DOE's policy to follow the letter and spirit of NEPA; comply fully with the CEQ Regulations; and apply the NEPA review process early in the planning stages for DOE proposals.

100

September 2012, 10 CFR 851 Work Group Status Overview  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10 CFR 851 Work Group Status Overview 10 CFR 851 Work Group Status Overview Accomplishments: 1. March 2012. 10 CFR 851 Workshop was held in conjunction with the 2012 Chemical Management Workshop. 2. Communication tools to enhance 10 CFR 851 Worker Safety and Health Program (WSHP) compliance updated: Requirements checklist distributed across DOE complex and on the 10 CFR 851 website; DOE Guide 440.1-1B to include technical clarifications. 3. Aug 7. A WG teleconference to reconfirm the actions described in the charter and to discuss the need to identify areas for the Work Groups next efforts. Near Term Goals/Activities: 1. Samples of acceptable WSHP programs (including ones based on ISM) will be posted on the 851 web site. 2. Teaming of HS-10, NTC, NIEHS, HAMMER to: Develop and/or identify

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "helium-48 cfr subpart" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

July 2012, 10 CFR 851 Work Group Status Overview  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10 CFR 851 Work Group Status Overview 10 CFR 851 Work Group Status Overview Accomplishments: 1. March 2012. 10 CFR 851 Workshop was held in conjunction with the 2012 Chemical Management Workshop. 2. Communication tools to enhance 10 CFR 851 Worker Safety and Health Program (WSHP) compliance updated: Requirements checklist distributed across DOE complex and on the 10 CFR 851 website; DOE Guide 440.1-1B to include technical clarifications. Near Term Goals/Activities: 1. Samples of acceptable WSHP programs (including ones based on ISM) will be posted on the 851 web site. 2. Teaming of HS-10, NTC, NIEHS, HAMMER to: Develop and/or identify applicable training materials and methods for the recent promulgated Hazard Communication standard, DOE wide approach for this training, and approach for

102

40 CFR Ch. I (7101 Edition) 61.20 coverage by a standard that applies  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

] Subpart B--National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions From Underground Uranium Mines SOURCE: 54 FR of this subpart are ap- plicable to the owner or operator of an active underground uranium mine which: (a) Has the following specific meanings: (a) Active mine means an underground uranium mine which is being venti- lated

103

DOE/EA-1463 Environmental Assessment for Interim Final Rule, 10 CFR 433 and 10 CFR 435  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

, 2007 , 2007 Environmental Assessment for Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and High-Rise Multi-Family Residential Buildings" and 10 CFR 435, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Residential Low-Rise Residential Buildings" (DOE/EA-1463) Environmental Assessment for Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and High-Rise Multi-Family Residential Buildings" and 10 CFR 435, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Residential Low-Rise Residential Buildings" (DOE/EA-1463) SUMMARY The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared this Environmental Assessment (EA) for DOE's Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for

104

DOE/EA-1463 Environmental Assessment for Interim Final Rule, 10 CFR 433 and 10 CFR 435  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Environmental Assessment for Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and High-Rise Multi-Family Residential Buildings" and 10 CFR 435, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Residential Low-Rise Residential Buildings" (DOE/EA-1463) Environmental Assessment for Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and High-Rise Multi-Family Residential Buildings" and 10 CFR 435, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Residential Low-Rise Residential Buildings" (DOE/EA-1463) SUMMARY The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared this Environmental Assessment (EA) for DOE's Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for

105

EA-1086: Amendments to 10 CFR Part 835 (Revised Version - 6/98) |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6: Amendments to 10 CFR Part 835 (Revised Version - 6/98) 6: Amendments to 10 CFR Part 835 (Revised Version - 6/98) EA-1086: Amendments to 10 CFR Part 835 (Revised Version - 6/98) SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of a proposal to issue as a final rulemaking an amended version of 10 CFR Part 835, "Occupational Radiation Protection." The amended version provides nuclear safety requirements that, if violated, provide DOE a basis for assessment of civil and criminal penalties under the Price-Anderson Amendments Act of 1988. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD August 31, 1996 EA-1086: Finding of No Significant Impact Amendments to 10 CFR Part 835 (Revised Version - 6/98) August 31, 1996 EA-1086: Final Environmental Assessment Amendments to 10 CFR Part 835 (Revised Version - 6/98)

106

Purex Plant comparison with 40 CFR 61, subpart H, and other referenced guidelines for the Product Removal (PR) (296-A-1) stack  

SciTech Connect

Dose calculations for atmospheric radionuclide releases from the Hanford Site for calendar year (CY) 1992 were performed by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) using the approved US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) CAP-88 computer model. Emissions from discharge points in the Hanford Site 100, 200, 300, 400, and 600 areas were calculated based on results of analyses of continuous and periodic sampling conducted at the discharge points. These calculated emissions were provided for inclusion in the CAP-88 model by area and by individual facility for those facilities having the potential to contribute more than 10 percent of the Hanford Site total or to result in an impact of greater than 0.1 mrem per year to the maximally exposed individual (MEI). Also included in the assessment of offsite dose modeling are the measured radioactive emissions from all Hanford Site stacks that have routine monitoring performed. Record sampling systems have been installed on all stacks and vents that use exhaust fans to discharge air that potentially may carry airborne radioactivity. Estimation of activity from ingrowth of long-lived radioactive progeny is not included in the CAP-88 model; therefore, the Hanford Site GENII code (Napier et al. 1988) was used to supplement the CAP-88 dose calculations. When the dose to the MEI located in the Ringold area was calculated, the effective dose equivalent (EDE) from combined Hanford Site radioactive airborne emissions was shown to be 3.7E-03 mrem. This value was reported in the annual air emission report prepared for the Hanford Site (RL 1993).

Lohrasbi, J.

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

107

Enforcement of 10 CFR Part 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule) fo  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AND INVESTIGATION SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 99-01: Enforcement of 10 CFR Part 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule) for Facilities Below Hazard Category III Section...

108

Economic feasibility study: CFR advanced direct coal liquefaction process. Volume 4  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Preliminary technical and economic data are presented on the CFR Advanced Coal Liquefaction Process. Operating cost estimates and material balances are given.

Not Available

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

109

2005 EPA WIPP RECERTIFICATION FACT SHEET No. 6 Karst in the Area of WIPP  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

OF CONTENTS Page I. Executive Summary 2 II. Introduction 4 III. EPA's WIPP Regulatory and Oversight Activities Provisions in the WIPP Compliance Criteria 10 E. 40 CFR Part 191, Subpart A: Standards for the Management (EPA) certified that the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) can safely contain transuranic (TRU

110

Science, Service, Stewardship National Marine Fisheries Service | Alaska Fisheries Science Center | Fisheries Monitoring and Analysis Division  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Section 402(b) of the MSA (18 U.S.C. 1881a(b)) and regulations at 50 C.F.R. Part 600, Subpart E............................................................................................................ 2-18 Sample Design Codes for Species Composition .............................................................................. 5-18 Clean Catches With One or Two Predominant Species

111

Science, Service, Stewardship National Marine Fisheries Service | Alaska Fisheries Science Center | Fisheries Monitoring and Analysis Division  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Section 402(b) of the MSA (18 U.S.C. 1881a(b)) and regulations at 50 C.F.R. Part 600, Subpart E................................................................................................ 2-18 Sample Unit Type for species composition............................................................................................................................ 4-18 Determining Offload Delivery Weights

112

TO: Reid Rosnick, Radiation Protection Division, Environmental Protection Agency FROM: Sarah M. Fields, Uranium Watch  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

: Sarah M. Fields, Uranium Watch DATE: November 25, 2009 RE: EPA REVIEW OF 40 CFR PART 61, SUBPART W -- RADON NESHAP FOR OPERATING URANIUM RECOVERY FACILITIES Below are some issues that the Environmental radionuclide NESHAPS in a timely manner. · Failure to properly implement radionuclide NESHAPS for uranium mills

113

65243Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 19, 1995 / Rules and Regulations [FR Doc. 9530797 Filed 121895; 8:45 am  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

regarding the requirements of the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Asbestos (asbestos NESHAP), 40 CFR part 61, subpart M which may contain multiple layers, any or all of which may be asbestos containing materials (ACM) under

114

CX-009655: Categorical Exclusion Determination  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Building and Equipment Instrumentation under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B2.2 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

115

CX-009668: Categorical Exclusion Determination  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Polychlorinated Biphenyl Removal under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B1.17 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

116

CX-009669: Categorical Exclusion Determination  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Relocation of Buildings under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B1.22 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

117

CX-009681: Categorical Exclusion Determination  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Electronic Equipment under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

118

CX-009666: Categorical Exclusion Determination  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Support Buildings under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

119

CX-009663: Categorical Exclusion Determination  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Transfer Actions under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B1.30 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

120

CX-009667: Categorical Exclusion Determination  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Asbestos Removal under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B1.16 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "helium-48 cfr subpart" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

CX-009664: Categorical Exclusion Determination  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Routine Maintenance and Custodial Services under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

122

CX-009670: Categorical Exclusion Determination  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Disconnection of Utilities under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B1.27 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

123

CX-009653: Categorical Exclusion Determination  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Oil Spill Cleanup under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B5.6 Date: 12/15/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

124

Enforcement Guidance Supplements (EGS)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Supplements (EGS) Supplements (EGS) EGS 05-01: Contractor Investigation, Causal Analysis, and Corrective Actions (09/23/2005) EGS 03-02: Revision to Occurrence Report-Based Noncompliance Tracking System Reporting Criteria (09/05/2003) EGS 03-01: Supplemental Guidance Concerning the Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.23 (07/21/2003) EGS 02-01: Enforcement Position Relative to 10 CFR 835 Bioassay Accreditation (02/21/2002) EGS 01-02: Management and Independent Assessment (12/17/2001) EGS 01-01: Nuclear Weapons Program Enforcement Issues (10/15/2001) EGS 00-04: Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.23 and Compliance Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR Subpart C (10/26/2000) EGS 00-03: Specific Issues on Applicability of 10 CFR 830 (09/12/2000)

125

U.S. Department of Energy NEPA Categorical Exclusion Determination Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

m ail m ail u.s. Department of Energy Categorical Exclusion Determination Form Proposed Action Title: Energy Retrofits Program or Field Office: EERE RW EECBG Location{sl (City/County/Stale):Ceres, CA Proposed Action Description: Replace AC unit and add insulation to un-insulated building Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied: 85.1 - Actions to conserve energy or water For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, including the full text of each categorical exclusion, see Subpart D of 10 CFR Part 1021 . Regulatory Requirements in 10 eFR 1021.41 O(b): (See full text in regulation) [{]The proposal fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or B to 10 eFR Part 1021, Subpart D. To fit within the classes of actions listed in 10 CFR Part 1021 , Subpart 0, Appendix B, a proposal must be one that would not: (I) threaten

126

U.S. Department of Energy NEPA Categorical Exclusion Determination Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Municipal Conservation Municipal Conservation Program or Field Office: EERE RW EECBG Location(s) (City/County/State): North Providence, RJ Proposed Action Description: North Providence proposes to replace the Town Hall HVAC system with an energy efficient system. Categorical Exclusionfs) Applied: 85.1 - Actions to conserve energy or water For the oomplete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regu lations regardi ng categorical exclusions. including the full text of each categorical exclusion, see Subpart 0 of 10 eFR Part 1021 . Regulatory Requirements in 10 eFR I021.410(b): (See full text in regulation) [{)The proposal fils within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or B to 10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart D. To fit within the classes of actions listed in 10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, a proposal must be one that would not: (1) threaten

127

U.S. Department of Energy NEPA Categorical Exclusion Determination Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Grand Junction, CO Grand Junction, CO Proposed Action Description: Grand Junction proposes to perform energy retrofits to municipal buildings and garages, installation of eNG refueling station and street tight energy evaluation and retrofits. Categorical Exclusion(sl Applied: 85.1 - Actions to conserve energy or waler For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, including the full text of each categorical exclusion, see Subpart D of 10 erR Part 1021 . Regulatory Requirements in 10 eFR I021.410(b): (See full text in regulation) [(}The proposal fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or 8 to 10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart D. To fit within the classes of actions listed in 10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart D, Appendix 8, a proposal must be one that would not : (I) threaten

128

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 21, 2003 August 21, 2003 Part III Department of Energy 10 CFR Part 600 Financial Assistance Regulations; Final Rule VerDate jul2003 17:53 Aug 20, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\21AUR2.SGM 21AUR2 50646 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 162 / Thursday, August 21, 2003 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Part 600 RIN 1991-AB57 Financial Assistance Regulations AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) is amending its Assistance Regulations by adding a new subpart, making minor amendments to existing subparts to reflect this change, and eliminating a section that contains internal procedures for DOE officials or requirements that are contained in other sections. The new subpart establishes

129

Duct Chase Sprinkler Replacement Project (4594), 5/31/2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Duct Chase Sprinkler Replacement Project (4594) Duct Chase Sprinkler Replacement Project (4594) Program or Field Office: Y-12 Site Office Location(s) (Citv/County/State): Oak Ridge, Anderson County, Tennessee Proposed Action Description: The proposed action is provide replacement of corroded and aged sprinkler heads in the plenum duct chases. Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied: 81.3- Routine maintenance Submit by E-mail For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, including the full text of each categorical exclusion, see Subpart D of I 0 CFR Part 1021. Regulatory Requirements in 10 CFR 1021.410(b): (See full text in regulation) [{Jrhe proposal fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A orB to 10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart D.

130

Nuclear Facility Safety Basis  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Safety Basis Safety Basis FUNCTIONAL AREA GOAL: A fully compliant Nuclear Facility Safety Basis. Program is implemented and maintained across the site. REQUIREMENTS:  10 CFR 830 Subpart B Guidance:  DOE STD 3009  DOE STD 1104  DOE STD  DOE G 421.1-2 Implementation Guide For Use in Developing Documented Safety Analyses To Meet Subpart B Of 10 CFR 830  DOE G 423.1-1 Implementation Guide For Use In Developing Technical Safety Requirements  DOE G 424.1-1 Implementation Guide For Use In Addressing Unreviewed Safety Question Requirements Performance Objective 1: Contractor Program Documentation The site contractor has developed an up-to-date, comprehensive, compliant, documented nuclear facility safety basis and associated implementing mechanisms and procedures for all required nuclear facilities and activities (10 CFR

131

U.S. Department of Energy Southwestern Power Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Idalia Substation Grounding and Drainage Improvements Idalia Substation Grounding and Drainage Improvements Program or Field Office: Southwestern Power Administration Location(s) (City/County/State): Idalia, Stoddard County, Missouri Proposed Action Description: Southwestern Power Administration proposes to perform necessary grounding and drainage improvements at the Idalia Substation facility. Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied: 10 CFR 1021, Appendix B to Subpart D, Part B4.6- Additions or modifications to electric power transmission facilities within a previously disturbed or developed facility area. For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, including the full text of each categorical exclusion, see Subpart D of I 0 CFR Part I 021 . Regulatory Requirements in 10 CFR 1021.41 O(b ): (See full text in regulation)

132

Dry Air Glovebox Project (4592), 5/31/2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Air Glovebox Projects (4592) Air Glovebox Projects (4592) Program or Field Office: Y-12 Site Office Location(s) (City/County/State): Oak Ridge, Anderson County, Tennessee Proposed Action Description: The proposed action is to convert the existing dry air glovebox to a negative pressure box. Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied: 81.31 -Installation or relocation of machinery and equipment Submit by E-mail For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, including the full text of each categorical exclusion, see Subpart D of 10 CFR Part 1021. Regulatory Requirements in 10 CFR 1021.410(b): (See full text in regulation) [{Jrhe proposal fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or 8 to 10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart D.

133

D11 WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES FOR TRANSURANIC WASTE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10 CFR Ch. X (1-1-12 Edition) Pt. 1022 D11 WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES FOR TRANSURANIC WASTE Siting, construction or expansion, and op- eration of disposal facilities for transuranic (TRU) waste and TRU mixed waste (TRU waste also containing hazardous waste as designated in 40 CFR part 261). D12 INCINERATORS Siting, construction, and operation of in- cinerators, other than research and develop- ment incinerators or incinerators for non- hazardous solid waste (as designated in 40 CFR 261.4(b)). PART 1022-COMPLIANCE WITH FLOODPLAIN AND WETLAND EN- VIRONMENTAL REVIEW REQUIRE- MENTS Subpart A-General Sec. 1022.1 Background. 1022.2 Purpose and scope. 1022.3 Policy. 1022.4 Definitions. 1022.5 Applicability. 1022.6 Public inquiries. Subpart B-Procedures for Floodplain and

134

U.S. Department of Energy Southwestern Power Administration  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Idalia Substation Grounding and Drainage Improvements Idalia Substation Grounding and Drainage Improvements Program or Field Office: Southwestern Power Administration Location(s) (City/County/State): Idalia, Stoddard County, Missouri Proposed Action Description: Southwestern Power Administration proposes to perform necessary grounding and drainage improvements at the Idalia Substation facility. Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied: 10 CFR 1021, Appendix B to Subpart D, Part B4.6- Additions or modifications to electric power transmission facilities within a previously disturbed or developed facility area. For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, including the full text of each categorical exclusion, see Subpart D of I 0 CFR Part I 021 . Regulatory Requirements in 10 CFR 1021.41 O(b ): (See full text in regulation)

135

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

61 - 2070 of 29,416 results. 61 - 2070 of 29,416 results. Page How is a Document Containing OUO Marked? Front page marking: http://energy.gov/hss/services/classification/official-use-only-information/how-document-containing-ouo-marked Download Request from City of Alexandria for Public Disclosure of Documents Related to Docket No. EO-05-01 http://energy.gov/oe/downloads/request-city-alexandria-public-disclosure-documents-related-docket-no-eo-05-01 Download INTERPRETATION REGARDING EXEMPTION RELIEF UNDER 10 C.F.R. PART 820, SUBPART E, EXEMPTION RELIEF, AND NON-COMPLIANT 'DOCUMENTED SAFETY ANALYSES' SUBJECT TO 10 C.F.R. PART 830, NUCLEAR SAFETY MANAGEMENT, SUBPART B, SAFETY BASIS REQUIREMENTS The following document is the Office of General Counsel (GC) interpretation regarding exemption relief pursuant to 10 C.F.R. Part 820, Procedural

136

Dry Pipe Sprinkler Piping Replacement Project (4588), 4/30/2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Pipe System Sprinkler Piping Replacement Projects (4588) Pipe System Sprinkler Piping Replacement Projects (4588) Program or Field Office: Y-12 Site Office Location(s) (City/County/State): Oak Ridge, Anderson County, Tennessee Proposed Action Description: Submit by E-mail The proposed action is to replace sections of dry pipe system sprinkler piping which include heads, hangers, fittings, and valves. Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied: 81.3- Routine maintenance For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, including the full text of each categorical exclusion, see Subpart D of I 0 CFR Part I 021. Regulatory Requirements in 10 CFR 1021.410(b): (See full text in regulation) [{Jrhe proposal fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A orB to 10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart D.

137

Electric Discharge Machining (EDM) Projects (4584), 4/11/2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Electric Discharge Machining (EDM) Projects (4584) Electric Discharge Machining (EDM) Projects (4584) Program or Field Office: Y -12 Site Office Location(s) (Citv/Countv/State): Oak Ridge, Anderson County, Tennessee Proposed Action Description: Submit by E-mail The proposed action is to installation of oil submerged Electric Discharge Machining (EDM) for development and production use. Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied: 81.31 -Installation or relocation of machinery and equipment For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, including the full text of each categorical exclusion, see Subpart D of 10 CFR Part 1021. Regulatory Requirements in 10 CFR 1021.410(b): (See full text in regulation) [{Jrhe proposal fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A orB to 10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart D.

138

Biosecurity reference : CFR-listed agent and toxin summaries.  

SciTech Connect

This reference document provides summary information on the animal, plant, zoonotic, and human pathogens and toxins regulated and categorized by 9 CFR 331 and 7 CFR 121, 'Agricultural Bioterrorism Protection Act of 2002; Possession, Use and Transfer of Biological Agents and Toxins,' and 42 CFR 73, 'Possession, Use, and Transfer of Select Agents and Toxins.' Summary information includes, at a minimum, a description of the agent and its associated symptoms; often additional information is provided on the diagnosis, treatment, geographic distribution, transmission, control and eradication, and impacts on public health.

Barnett, Natalie Beth

2003-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

139

General Counsel Legal Interpretation Regarding Medical Removal Protection Benefits Pursuant to 10 CFR Part 850, Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The following document is the Office of the General Counsel (GC) interpretation regarding Medical Removal Protection Benefits Pursuant to 10 CFR Part 850, Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program.

140

Chemical Hygiene Plan In Accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1450 and R325.70106  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Chemical Hygiene Plan In Accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1450 and R325.70106 Occupational Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in Laboratories Office of Environmental Health & Safety 5425 Woodward, Suite 300 Detroit to Hazardous Chemicals in Laboratories (29 CFR 1910.1450). The Michigan Occupational Safety and Health

Cinabro, David

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "helium-48 cfr subpart" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Department of Transportation -- Exemption for using the Transuranic Package Transporter-I (TRUPACT-I) at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (Code of Federal Regulations, Title 49, Part 107, Subpart B -- Exemptions, 107-103 Application for Exemption)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Exemption from specific regulations is being sought for the Transuranic Package Transporter Model I (TRUPACT-I) container. The design has successfully undergone extensive testing of a quarter-scale model and a full-scale prototype of the container. Results from the analysis and testing are in the TRUPACT-1 Safely Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP), GA-Al8695/SAND 87-7104 (TTC0735), April 1987 (see Attachment 1). The container was never certified or used because of questions raised during the certification process. Two features of the container design failed to satisfy the regulations for Type B packaging. First, the design utilizes a venting system to control internal and external pressures; this venting system is not allowed by the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 71(h) and 71.51(b) [10 CFR 71.(h) and 71.51(b)]. Second, the maximum quantity fissile material proposed to be hauled in TRUPACT-I exceeded the limits in 10 CFR 71.63(b) for a single-containment container. To correct these design deficiencies, the vents would be plugged during transport, and the maximum quantity of fissile material would be limited to the allowables for a single-containment container. An engineering analysis showed that the container could safely transport radioactive material within the boundaries of the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL) with the vent system plugged (see Attachment 2). However, some of the requirements for determining pressure on a container need to be changed (i.e., exempted) to reflect conditions unique to the INEL. The following are the requirements needing to be changed for INEL conditions, variances being sought, and justifications for the variances.

Tyacke, M.J.; Macdonald, R.J.

1992-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

142

Environmental Assessment for Final Rule, 10 CFR 43  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

"Energy "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and High-Rise Multi-Family Residential Buildings" and 10 CFR 435, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Residential Low-Rise Residential Buildings" Baseline Standards Update (DOE/EA-1871) March 16, 2011 2 Environmental Assessment for Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and High-Rise Multi-Family Residential Buildings" and 10 CFR 435, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Residential Low-Rise Residential Buildings" Baseline Standards Update (DOE/EA-1871) SUMMARY The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared this Environmental Assessment (EA) for DOE's Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for

143

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 99-03 Limitation of 10 CFR Part 830 to  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Limitation of 10 CFR Part 830 Limitation of 10 CFR Part 830 to Equipment Referenced in theSafety Analysis Report Enforcement Guidance Supplement 99-03 Limitation of 10 CFR Part 830 to Equipment Referenced in theSafety Analysis Report The attached is DOE's response to denying that argument. Since this argument has from time to time been put forth by certain contractors, and routinely denied by DOE, I am forwarding the attached reply for your information so that all DOE Coordinators and contractors implementing PAAA requirements are clear on the applicability of Part 830. Enforcement Guidance Supplement 99-03 Limitation of 10 CFR Part 830 to Equipment Referenced in theSafety Analysis Report More Documents & Publications Enforcement Guidance Supplement 99-03: Limitation of 10 CFR Part 830 to

144

EA-1778: Proposed Rule, 10 CFR 433 and 435, Energy Conservation and Fossil  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

78: Proposed Rule, 10 CFR 433 and 435, Energy Conservation and 78: Proposed Rule, 10 CFR 433 and 435, Energy Conservation and Fossil Fuel-Generated Energy EA-1778: Proposed Rule, 10 CFR 433 and 435, Energy Conservation and Fossil Fuel-Generated Energy Summary This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of DOE's Proposed Rule, 10 CFR Part 433, "Energy Conservation and Fossil Fuel-Generated Energy Consumption Reduction Standards for the Design and Construction of New Federal Commercial and Multi-Family High-Rise Residential Buildings" and 10 CFR Part 435, "Energy Conservation and Fossil Fuel-Generated Energy Consumption Reduction Standards for the Design and Construction of New Federal Low-Rise Residential Buildings". Public Comment Opportunities No public comment opportunities available at this time.

145

10 CFR 851 Worker Safety and Health Program | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10 CFR 851 10 CFR 851 Worker Safety and Health Program 10 CFR 851 Worker Safety and Health Program Office of Health and Safety: Establishes worker safety and health requirements and expectations for the Department to ensure protection of workers from the hazards associated with Department operations. The 10 C.F.R. 851 Work Group is established to promote excellence in the implementation of 10 C.F.R. 851, "Worker Safety and Health" and continuous improvement in the implementation of health and safety programs for the DOE contractor work force. The Work Group provides a collaborative opportunity for DOE to gain insights from the contractor work force and their representatives, and identify and communicate best practices. Focal areas of interest include hazard identification, worker knowledge of aging

146

INTERPRETIVE GUIDANCE ON THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 C.F.R. § 205.322 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

INTERPRETIVE GUIDANCE ON THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 C.F.R. § 205.322 INTERPRETIVE GUIDANCE ON THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 C.F.R. § 205.322 INTERPRETIVE GUIDANCE ON THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 C.F.R. § 205.322 This guidance is intended to clarify the Department of Energy (DOE)'s interpretation of 10 C.F.R. § 205.322, which sets forth the contents of an application for a Presidential permit issued by DOE under Executive Order (E.O.) 10485, as amended by E.O. 12038. Anyone seeking to construct, operate, maintain, or connect an electric transmission facility crossing the borders of the United States must first obtain a Presidential permit. INTERPRETIVE GUIDANCE ON THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 C.F.R. § 205.322 More Documents & Publications Application for Presidential Permit OE Docket No. PP-371 Northern Pass: Comments from Conservation Law Foundation, Appalachian Mountain Club, and

147

DOE Order Self Study Modules - 10 CFR 835 Occupational Radiation Protection  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10 CFR 835 10 CFR 835 OCCUPATIONAL RADIATION PROTECTION NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION LEARNING AND CAREER DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Change No: 1 10 CFR 835 Level: Familiar Date:11/1/08 1 10/1/08 10 CFR 835 OCCUPATIONAL RADIATION PROTECTION FAMILIAR LEVEL ___________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources, you will be able to perform the following: 1. State the scope of 10 CFR 835. 2. Define the following terms. annual limit on intake bioassay contamination area derived air concentration high contamination area radiation weighting factor 3. State the requirements of the general rule. 4. State the radiation protection program requirements. 5. State the requirements of the internal audit.

148

EA-1871: 10 CFR 433, Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1: 10 CFR 433, Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal 1: 10 CFR 433, Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and High-Rise Multi-Family Residential Buildings and 10 CFR 435, Energy Eff. Stds. For New Federal Residential Low-Rise Residential Buildings EA-1871: 10 CFR 433, Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and High-Rise Multi-Family Residential Buildings and 10 CFR 435, Energy Eff. Stds. For New Federal Residential Low-Rise Residential Buildings Summary This EA evaluates the potential environmental impacts of revising the Federal building energy efficiency standards to the ASHRAE 90.1-2007 and IECC 2009. Public Comment Opportunities No public comment opportunities available at this time. Documents Available for Download July 13, 2011 EA-1871: Finding of No Significant Impact Energy Efficiency Design Standards for New Federal Commercial and

149

Notices  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

68 Federal Register 68 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2011 / Notices conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, and displayed either by publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR part 9. Abstract: The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of the NESHAP at 40 CFR part 63, subpart A, and any changes, or additions to the

150

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 03-01 Supplemental Guidance Concerning the  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Supplement 03-01 Supplemental Guidance Supplement 03-01 Supplemental Guidance Concerning the Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.23 Enforcement Guidance Supplement 03-01 Supplemental Guidance Concerning the Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.23 In October 2000, the Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) issued Enforcement Guidance Supplement (EGS) 00-04, "Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.23 and Compliance Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR subpart C." That EGS, in part, delineated a set of criteria that OE would use to determine whether to apply its enforcement discretion, in this case through the use of Consent Orders. Those criteria provided both guidance to DOE contractors regarding situations for which the use of

151

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: B1.16 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Categorical Exclusion Determinations: B1.16 Existing Regulations B1.16: Asbestos removal Removal of asbestos-containing materials from buildings in accordance with applicable requirements (such as 40 CFR part 61, "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants"; 40 CFR part 763, "Asbestos"; 29 CFR part 1910, subpart I, "Personal Protective Equipment"; and 29 CFR part 1926, "Safety and Health Regulations for Construction"; and appropriate state and local requirements, including certification of removal contractors and technicians). Previous Regulations Categorical Exclusion Determinations dated before November 14th, 2011 were issued under previous DOE NEPA regulations. See the Notice of Final Rulemaking (76 FR 63763, 10/13/2011) for information changes to this

152

DOE-STD-1083-2009 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

83-2009 83-2009 DOE-STD-1083-2009 June 29, 2009 Processing Exemptions to Nuclear Safety Rules and Approval of Alternative Methods for Documented Safety Analyses DOE may grant temporary or permanent exemptions from its nuclear safety requirements in rules provided that the provisions of 10 C.F.R. Part 820, Subpart E, ""Exemption Relief,"" are met. The provisions of 10 C.F.R. Part 820 state that the Secretarial Officer (defined in 10 C.F.R. Part 820) shall utilize any procedures deemed necessary and appropriate to comply with the exemption responsibilities. This Standard establishes acceptable procedures that may be used to request and grant exemptions to DOE nuclear safety rules in accordance with 10 C.F.R. Part 820. DOE-STD-1083-2009, Processing Exemptions to Nuclear Safety Rules and

153

DOE-STD-1083-2009 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2009 2009 DOE-STD-1083-2009 June 29, 2009 Processing Exemptions to Nuclear Safety Rules and Approval of Alternative Methods for Documented Safety Analyses DOE may grant temporary or permanent exemptions from its nuclear safety requirements in rules provided that the provisions of 10 C.F.R. Part 820, Subpart E, ""Exemption Relief,"" are met. The provisions of 10 C.F.R. Part 820 state that the Secretarial Officer (defined in 10 C.F.R. Part 820) shall utilize any procedures deemed necessary and appropriate to comply with the exemption responsibilities. This Standard establishes acceptable procedures that may be used to request and grant exemptions to DOE nuclear safety rules in accordance with 10 C.F.R. Part 820. DOE-STD-1083-2009, Processing Exemptions to Nuclear Safety Rules and

154

10 CFR 1021 -- National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1021 -- NATIONAL 1021 -- NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES Subpart A -- General Sec. 1021.100 Purpose. 1021.101 Policy. 1021.102 Applicability. 1021.103 Adoption of CEQ NEPA regulations. 1021.104 Definitions. 1021.105 Oversight of Agency NEPA activities. Subpart B -- DOE Decisionmaking 1021.200 DOE planning. 1021.210 DOE decisionmaking. 1021.211 Interim actions: Limitations on actions during the NEPA process. 1021.212 Research, development, demonstration, and testing. 1021.213 Rulemaking. 1021.214 Adjudicatory proceedings. 1021.215 Applicant process. 1021.216 Procurement, financial assistance, and joint ventures. Subpart C -- Implementing Procedures 1021.300 General requirements. 1021.301 Agency review and public participation. 1021.310 Environmental impact statements.

155

EPA 40CFR194 Changes  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

NOTIFICATION OF PLANNED CHANGE TO THE EPA NOTIFICATION OF PLANNED CHANGE TO THE EPA 40 CFR PART 194 CERTIFICATION OF THE WASTE ISOLATION PILOT PLANT REMOTE-HANDLED TRANSURANIC WASTE CHARACTERIZATION PLAN April 30, 2003 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CARLSBAD FIELD OFFICE i Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................ iii 1.0 Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 2.0 Nature and Scope .................................................................................................................3 2.1 Overview..........................................................................................................................

156

Hearings | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hearings Hearings Hearings Security Hearings The DOE has established procedures that govern the resolution of questions concerning the eligibility of individuals who are employed by or applicants for employment with DOE contractors, agents, and DOE access permittees; individuals who are DOE employees or applicants for DOE employment; and other persons designated by the Secretary of Energy for access to classified matter or special nuclear material. (This access authorization is commonly referred to as a security clearance.) These procedures are codified in Subpart A of 10 CFR Part 710. Subpart A provides an opportunity for hearing and administrative review in cases when it is determined that questions concerning an individual's eligibility for access authorization

157

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. BM-MM-660  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

660 660 Title: Rework BM 30" Crude Oil Pipeline Mainline Valves Description: Subcontractor shall furnish all labor, tools, materials, equipment and supervision required to rework the BM 30" crude oil pipeline mainline valves. Tasks include excavation of the valve stations, installation of vent valves, and rework of the crude oil pipeline mainline valves. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment

158

Enforcement Action - EA 2004-07  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Mr. Woodrow B. Jameson [ ] Fluor Fernald Inc. P.O. Box 538704 Cincinnati, Ohio 45253-8704 EA 2004-07 Subject: Preliminary Notice of Violation for Deficiencies Related to the Control of Respirators at the Waste Pit Project Dear Mr. Jameson: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Price- Anderson Enforcement's (OE) recent review of programmatic failures involving the use of respiratory protection at the Waste Pit Project (WPP). Our review identified that specific noncompliances under 10 CFR 830, Subpart A, "Quality Assurance Requirements," and 10 CFR 835 "Occupational Radiation Protection" have occurred as described in the attached Preliminary Notice of Violation (PNOV).

159

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. BH-OM-1065B  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

B B Title: Remanufacture, Transport, and Install BHTX-29 Transformer Description: Subcontractor shall provide all labor, supervision, tools, equipment, and transportation required to remanufacture (repair), transport, install, test, and pre-commission the BHTX- 29 transformer. Work will be performed at the subcontractor's off-site facility. Proper lift and transportation equipment will be required to load and transport the BHTX-29 transformer from the off-site location to the Big Hill site. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has

160

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. PR 10069318  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

318 318 Title: WH Air Conditioning/Heating Repairs, 2010-2013 Description: Subcontractor shall provide all labor, materials, tools, equipment, transportation and supervision required to tear down, inspect, and perform minor repairs to the air conditioning and heating units at WH on a "will call or as needed basis" during the period from 2010 to 2013. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions).

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "helium-48 cfr subpart" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. BH-MM-658  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

658 658 Title: Rework BH 36" Crude Oil Pipeline Mainline Valves Description: Subcontractor shall furnish all labor, tools, materials, equipment and supervision required to rework the BH 36" crude oil pipeline mainline valves. Tasks include excavation of the valve stations, installation of vent valves, and rework of the crude oil pipeline mainline valves. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment

162

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. BM-09-111  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

11 11 Title: Provide Clear Zone Around Bryan Mound Description: Subcontractor shall furnish all materials, tools, equipment, supplies, transportation, labor, supervision, and service required to machine clear standing vegetation at the Bryan Mound site. The total area to be cleared does not exceed 132 acres. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following:

163

Enforcement Guidance Supplement (EGS) 00-04  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enforcement Guidance Supplement Enforcement Guidance Supplement EGS: 00-04 Appendix E- Operational Procedures for Enforcement Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 October 23, 2000 MEMORANDUM FOR: DOE PAAA COORDINATORS CONTRACTOR PAAA COORDINATORS FROM: R. KEITH CHRISTOPHER DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND INVESTIGATION SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-04: Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.23 and Compliance Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR Subpart C DOE' s Operational Procedures for Enforcement (June 1998), which supercede the DOE Enforcement Handbook (1087-95), provides the Office of Enforcement and Investigation with the opportunity to issue interim enforcement guidance from time to time with

164

Radiological worker training  

SciTech Connect

This Handbook describes an implementation process for core training as recommended in Implementation Guide G441.12, Radiation Safety Training, and as outlined in the DOE Radiological Control Standard (RCS). The Handbook is meant to assist those individuals within the Department of Energy, Managing and Operating contractors, and Managing and Integrating contractors identified as having responsibility for implementing core training recommended by the RCS. This training is intended for radiological workers to assist in meeting their job-specific training requirements of 10 CFR 835. While this Handbook addresses many requirements of 10 CFR 835 Subpart J, it must be supplemented with facility-specific information to achieve full compliance.

NONE

1998-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

165

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. BC-MM-789  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

789 789 Title: Replace BC Warehouse Firewater Piping Description: Subcontractor shall provide design, plans, materials, labor and supervision required to replace the dry automatic sprinkler system found in the BC Property Warehouse (Building 411). Tasks include installation and hydrostatic testing of the new sprinkler system. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following:

166

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. Multiple  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Multiple Multiple Title: Third Party Services for SPR Workovers Description: Subcontractor shall furnish all labor, supervision, tools, materials, equipment, supplies, transportation and facilities required to perform remediation workovers of SPR cavern wellbores and brine disposal wells. Typical remediation workovers include cementing a steel liner inside existing cased wellbore, and permanently plugging and abandoning wells. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment ( categorical exclusions).

167

Microsoft Word - WH-MM-819A NEPA.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9A 9A Title: Clean and Inspect WHT-15 Brine Tank Description: Subcontractor shall furnish all transportation, materials, equipment, supplies, tools, facilities, utilities, labor and supervision required to clean and inspect the WHT-15 brine tank. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following: (1) The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or B of Subpart D;

168

Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Low-Rise Residential Buildings  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standards for New Federal Low-Rise Residential Standards for New Federal Low-Rise Residential Buildings Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Low-Rise Residential Buildings October 8, 2013 - 1:57pm Addthis DOE recently updated the requirements for energy efficiency in newly constructed federal buildings. The new rule, 10 CFR 435, Subpart A: Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Low-Rise Residential Buildings, applies to residential buildings (one- and two-family dwellings as well as multifamily buildings three stories or less in height) for which design for construction began on or after August 10, 2012. The rule updates the baseline standard in 10 CFR 435, Subpart A to the 2009 IECC. New federal residential buildings are required (effective August 10, 2012) to achieve the 2009 IECC level of energy efficiency or 30% greater

169

Surveillance Guide - OSS 19.1 Personal Protective Equipment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT 1.0 Objective The objective of this surveillance is to evaluate the use of personal protection equipment to mitigate hazards that workers encounter in performing their jobs. The surveillance activities provide a basis for determining if contractor management is ensuring the appropriate personal protective equipment is used, and that the contractor is complying with DOE requirements. 2.0 References 2.1 DOE 5480.1B, Environment, Safety and Health Program for Department of Energy Operators 2.2 29 CFR 1926, Subpart E, Personal Protective Equipment and Life-Saving Equipment 2.3 29 CFR 1910, Subpart I, Personal Protective Equipment 3.0 Requirements Implemented This surveillance is conducted to implement requirements OS-0025

170

U.S. Department of Energy Southwestern Power Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Short Mountain Transmission Line Access Road Easement Acquisition Short Mountain Transmission Line Access Road Easement Acquisition Program or Field Office: Southwestern Power Administration Location(s) (City/County/State): Short Mountain, Leflore County, Oklahoma Proposed Action Description: Southwestern Power Administration proposes to obtain an easement to access a portion of transmission line located on Short Mountain in Leflore County, Oklahoma. Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied: l 0 CFR 102 l, Appendix B to Subpart D, Part B 1.24- Transfer, lease, disposition, or acquisition of interests in personal property or real property. For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, including the full text of each categorical exclusion, see Subpart D of 10 CFR Part 1021

171

The  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Office of Legacy Management Office of Legacy Management NO. OF PAGES/ATTACHMENTS: 7 pages, 18 attachments U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management SUBJECT: LM BUSINESS CENTER RECORDS OPERATIONS 1. PURPOSE. To ensure records management operations in the Legacy Management (LM) Business Center (BC) are conducted according to Federal requirements and U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) directives. 2. CANCELLATION. None 3. REFERENCES. a. 44 United States Code (U.S.C.) 29, Records Management b. 36 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Chapter XII, Subpart B, Records Management c. DOE Guide 1324.5B, Implementation Guide for Use with 36 CFR Chapter XII, Subpart B, Records Management d. DOE Order 243.1, Records Management Program e. DOE Order 243.2, Vital Records

172

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. WH-09-119  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9-119 9-119 Title: Replace Fiberglass Covers/Troughs on Traveling Screens at WH RWIS Description: Subcontractor shall replace all fiberglass covers and troughs on the traveling screens at the West Hackberry Raw Water Intake Structure. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following: (1) The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or B of Subpart D;

173

Substation in Clark County, Nevada RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Substation for soil remediation. Substation for soil remediation. The attached map shows the borrow area which is situated in Sections 18, 19,20 Township 18 South Range 64 East, Mount Diablo Meridian, Clark County, Nevada. The corresponding U.S.G.S. 7.S-minute topographic maps are Apex, Dry Lake, Dry Lake NW, and Dry Lake SE, Nevada. B. Categorical Exclusion Applied: 10 CFR, Part 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B4.11: "Construction of electric power substations with power delivery at 230kV or below or modification of existing sUbstations." C. Regulatory Requirements in 10 CFR 1021.410 Ib): 1. The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix B to Subpart D. a. The proposed action was reviewed for the requirements of the Endangered Species Act, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the National

174

Training Program EHS ~ 244: Resistance Spot Welding Safety Training  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4: Resistance Spot Welding Safety Training 4: Resistance Spot Welding Safety Training Course Syllabus Subject Category: Resistance Spot Welding Course Prerequisite: None Course Length: 25 minutes Medical Approval: No Delivery Mode: Web-Based Course Goal: Participants will be introduced to resistance spot welding processes, hazards, and safe work practices. Course Objectives: By the end of this course, you will be able to: * Identify resistance spot welding processes * Identify hazards, safe work practices, and personal protective equipment associated with resistance spot welding * Recognize the purpose of resistance spot welding schedules * Locate resistance spot welding schedule Subject Matter Expert: Joe Dionne x 7586 Training Compliance: 29 CFR 1910 Subparts O & Z, 29 CFR 1926 Subparts J & Z

175

Substation in Clark County, Nevada RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SUbstation for soil remediation. SUbstation for soil remediation. The attached map shows the borrow area which is situated in Sections 18, 19,20 Township 18 South Range 64 East, Mount Diablo Meridian, Clark County, Nevada. The corresponding U.S.G.S. 7.5-minute topographic maps are Apex, Dry Lake, Dry Lake NW, and Dry Lake SE, Nevada. B. Categorical Exclusion Applied: 10 CFR, Part 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B4.11: "Construction of electric power substations with power delivery at 230kV or below or modification of existing SUbstations." C. Regulatory Requirements in 10 CFR 1021.410 (b): 1. The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix B to Subpart D. a. The proposed action was reviewed for the requirements of the Endangered Species Act, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the National

176

 

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Select the appropriate categorical exclusion(s) from Appendix B to Subpart D of 10 CFR Part 1021 (for Appendix (A) use bottom two pull-down menus) Select the appropriate categorical exclusion(s) from Appendix B to Subpart D of 10 CFR Part 1021 (for Appendix (A) use bottom two pull-down menus) The proposed action would involve retaining an engineering consultant to complete a micro-hydro feasibility study for selected hydropower resources. As follow-up to a completed reconnaissance study, the consultant will collect additional field data necessary to develop conceptual and preliminary designs to include selection of intake site, penstock route, powerhouse site, material requirements, stream flow hydrology, integration with existing diesel, probable development costs, permitting requirements, estimate of available energy and capacity offered by the project, and benefits to the community. The Feasibility Study serve as the basis for soliciting funding to construct a micro-hydro project and provide long-term,

177

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project 10 No. BH-MM-746  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

BH-MM-746 BH-MM-746 Title: BH Anhydrite Pond Liner Replacement Description: Subcontractor shall provide all labor, tools, equipment, materials, consumables, services, insurance, transportation, storage and supervision required to replace the BH Anhydrite Pond Liner. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following: (1) The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or B of Subpart D;

178

Wiring methods, components, and equipment for general use. - 1926.405  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Wiring methods, components, and equipment for general use. - 1926.405 Wiring methods, components, and equipment for general use. - 1926.405 www.OSHA.gov A-Z Index: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Regulations (Standards - 29 CFR) Wiring methods, components, and equipment for general use. - 1926.405 Regulations (Standards - 29 CFR) - Table of Contents * Part Number: 1926 * Part Title: Safety and Health Regulations for Construction * Subpart: K * Subpart Title: Electrical * Standard Number: 1926.405 * Title: Wiring methods, components, and equipment for general use. 1926.405(a) Wiring methods. The provisions of this paragraph do not apply to conductors which form an integral part of equipment such as motors, controllers, motor control centers and like equipment. 1926.405(a)(1) General requirements -

179

SQA Directives and Guidance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SQA Directives and Guidance SQA Directives and Guidance SQA Directives and Guidance DOE O 414.1D, Quality Assurance DOE G 414.1-4, Software Guide for use with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance DOE Order O 414.1D, Quality Assurance, includes Attachment 4 addressing SQA requirements for nuclear safety applications at DOE nuclear facilities. The DOE O 414.1D was issued April 25, 2011. This Order and its associated Guide for safety software, DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Guide for use with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements. The Order identifies 10 software quality work activities that are to be performed using the graded approach specified in the Order. These 10 work activities are: (1) software project management, (2) software risk

180

Surveillance Guide - ERS 14.3 Underground and Above Ground Diesel Fuel Storage Tanks  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GROUND DIESEL FUEL STORAGE TANKS UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GROUND DIESEL FUEL STORAGE TANKS 1.0 Objective The objective of this surveillance is to verify underground and above ground diesel storage tanks are maintained, monitored, configured and marked as required. These surveillance activities provide a basis for evaluating the effectiveness of the contractor's program for implementation of appropriate controls and compliance with DOE requirements. 2.0 References 1. DOE O 440.1A, Worker Protection Management For DOE Federal And Contractor Employees [http://www.explorer.doe.gov:1776/cgi-bin/w3vdkhgw?qryBGD07_rSj;doe- 1261] 1. 29CFR1910.1200, Subpart Z, Hazard Communication [Access http://www.osha-slc.gov/OshStd_data/1910_1200.html ] 2. 29CFR1910.106, Subpart H, Flammable And Combustible Liquids [Access at

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "helium-48 cfr subpart" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

U.S. Department of Energy NEPA Categorical Exclusion Determination Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Select the appropriate categorical exclusion(s) from Appendix B to Subpart D of 10 CFR Part 1021 (for Appendix (A) use bottom two pull-down menus) Select the appropriate categorical exclusion(s) from Appendix B to Subpart D of 10 CFR Part 1021 (for Appendix (A) use bottom two pull-down menus) 1) Develop an energy efficiency and conservation strategy, 2) technical consultant to conduct an analysis of the potential for a biomass to energy project, 3) hire a Sustainability Coordinator, 4) create an enhanced residential curbside recycling program, 5) streetlight retrofits. The original forms were signed by Gary Hartman on behalf of EERE on 4/1/2010. The original CX determination form is attached. Oak Ridge Office EEC Strategy and Analysis, Retrofits and Recycling Program MI- City- Dearborn Print Form for Records Submit to Website Submit via Email X- A9 - Information gathering/data analysis/document preparation/dissemination

182

APPLICATION OF A CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Granting of a real estate license by the Department of Energy to Duke Energy for the purpose Granting of a real estate license by the Department of Energy to Duke Energy for the purpose of conducting site environmental evaluation activities on the north portion of the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Facility to determine environmental conditions and determine if further study is warranted. Evaluation activities will consist of, but are not limited to, soil and rock sampling, geotechnical surveys, ecological surveys, and rare, threatened and endangered species evaluations. Number and Title of the Categorical Exclusion Applied: 10 CFR 1021, Appendix B to Subpart D, CX. A.1 for the granting of the real estate license and B.3.1 for activities to determine environmental conditions.. The regulatory requirements from 10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart D,

183

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. WH-MM-1022  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1022 1022 Title: Access to Remote Valve Station WH-2 Description: Subcontractor shall furnish all labor, materials, equipment, tools, transportation, supervision, mobil lifting equipment, and rigging required to repair access to remopte valve station WH-2. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following: (1) The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or B of Subpart D;

184

EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 0)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

I I ~ r h b 1tv2om m ~ e e of Environments1M a ~ f p ~ ~ ! n n t (EM) Snbjeet: E M Quality Asamnee Program (QBP) Policies, Procedures, APPROVED: and Plans Principal Deputy Secretary for Environmental Management 1.0 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE The purpose of this document is to describe the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Environmental Management (EM) Quality Assurance Program (QAP). The QAP is the EM management system to ensure we "do work correctly." The QAP meets the requirements of DOE 0 414. IC, Quality Assurance, and 10 CFR 830 Subpart A "Quality Assurance Requirements." It is intended that the requirements of DOE 0 414.1C and 10 CFR 830 Subpart A are met by implementing this QAP. The QAP provides EM expectations for implementing quality assurance (QA) across the EM complex. The QAP

185

Southwestern Power Administration Categorical Exclusion Determination Form  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc. Substation Improvements Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc. Substation Improvements Program or Field Office: Southwestern Power Administration Location{s) (City/County/State): Springfield, Missouri, Greene County Proposed Action Description: Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc. proposes to install new underground conduit and cable in Southwestern Power Administrations' Springfield, Missouri electrical substation. Categorical ExciusionCs) Al'l'lied: 10 CFR 1021, Appendix B to Subpart D, Part B4.6- Additions and modifications to electric power transmission facilities within a previously disturbed or developed facility . For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, including the full text of each categorical exclusion, see Subpart D of 10 CFR Part 1021.

186

U.S. Department of Energy Southwestern Power Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Transmission Line 3016 Access Road Acquisition Project Transmission Line 3016 Access Road Acquisition Project Program or Field Office: Southwestern Power Administration Location(s) (City/County/State): Porum, Muskogee County, Oklahoma Proposed Action Description: Southwestern Power Administration proposes to aquire an access road easement. This access road will enable vehicles and equipment to maintain and operate portion of transmission line 3016 near the structure 3 I area. Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied: 10 CFR l 021 , Appendix B to Subpart D, Part B 1.24- Transfer, lease, disposition, or acquisition of interests in personal property or real property. For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, including the full text of each categorical exclusion, see Subpart D of I 0 CFR Part 1021

187

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. PR-10084713  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PR-10084713 PR-10084713 Title: Purchase of BH Control Valve Assembly Description: Vendor shall supply and deliver one 16-inch, 600# Control Valve Assembly to the Big Hill SPR site. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following: (1) The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or B of Subpart D; (2) There are no extraordinary circumstances related to the proposal that may affect the

188

Southwestern Power Administration Categorical Exclusion Determination Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc. Substation Improvements Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc. Substation Improvements Program or Field Office: Southwestern Power Administration Location{s) (City/County/State): Springfield, Missouri, Greene County Proposed Action Description: Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc. proposes to install new underground conduit and cable in Southwestern Power Administrations' Springfield, Missouri electrical substation. Categorical ExciusionCs) Al'l'lied: 10 CFR 1021, Appendix B to Subpart D, Part B4.6- Additions and modifications to electric power transmission facilities within a previously disturbed or developed facility . For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, including the full text of each categorical exclusion, see Subpart D of 10 CFR Part 1021.

189

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. BH-MM-761  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Title: Replace BH RWIS Oil Water Separator Tank with Concrete Tank Description: Subcontractor shall furnish all labor, tools, materials, equipment and supervision required to replace the BH RWIS oil water separator tank with a new concrete tank. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following: (1) The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or B of Subpart D;

190

Microsoft Word - BH-OM-1089 NEPA.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

BH-OM-1089 BH-OM-1089 Title: BH Fence Extension Modifications Description: Subcontractor shall shall provide all labor, materials, equipment, tools, fabrication, transportation, supervision, mobile lifting equipment, and rigging required to install BH fence modifications. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following: (1) The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or B of Subpart D;

191

DOE G 414.1-4 and 404.1-2B Training module  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

14.1-4 14.1-4 SAFETY SOFTWARE GUIDE FOR USE WITH 10 CFR 830, SUBPART A, QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS, AND DOE O 414.1C, QUALITY ASSURANCE DOE G 414.1-2B QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM GUIDE DOE G 414.1-4 and DOE G 414.1-2B Familiar Level November 2011 1 DOE G 414.1-4 SAFETY SOFTWARE GUIDE FOR USE WITH 10 CFR 830, SUBPART A, QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS, AND DOE O 414.1C, QUALITY ASSURANCE DOE G 414.1-2B QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM GUIDE FAMILIAR LEVEL OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources, you will be able to answer the following questions: 1. What is the purpose of DOE O 414.1D, attachment 3, Suspect/Counterfeit Items Prevention? 2. What are four ways of preventing introduction of suspect/counterfeit items (S/CIs) into

192

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

proposes to add additional shop and office space onto two existing facilities proposes to add additional shop and office space onto two existing facilities located at the Jonesboro, Arkansas Maintenance Facility. PROPOSED BY: Southwestern Power Administration - U.S. Dept. of Energy DATE: May 09, 2011 NUMBERS AND TITLES OF THE CATEGORICAL EXCLUSIONS BEING APPLIED: 10 CFR 1021, Appendix B to Subpart 0 , Part B1 .15- Siting, construction or modification, and operation of support buildings and structures within or contiguous to an already developed area . REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS IN 10 CFR 1021.410(B): (1) The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A & B to Subpart D. For classes of action listed in Appendix A or B, the following conditions are integral elements, i.e., to fit within a class,

193

U.S. Department of Energy Southwestern Power Admin  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Admin Admin istration Categorical Exclusion Determination Form Proposed Action Title: Moodys Radio Tower Land Acquisition Program or Field Office: Southwestern Power Administration Location(s) (City/County/State): Moodys, Cherokee County, Oklahoma Proposed Action Description: Southwestern Power Administration proposes to obtain title, in fee, for a portion of land at the Southwestern Power Administration Moody Radio Tower site. Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied: I 0 CFR 1021, Appendix B to Subpart D, Part B 1.24- Transfer, lease, disposition, or acquisition of interests in personal property or real property. For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, including the full text of each categorical exclusion, see Subpart D of 10 CFR Part 1021

194

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection-Richland  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, 2012 5, 2012 CX-009658: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Small-Scale Research and Development, Laboratory Operations, and Pilot Projects under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 5, 2012 CX-009657: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Site Characterization and Environmental Monitoring under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 5, 2012 CX-009656: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Facility Safety

195

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. WH-046-010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

46-010 46-010 Title: WHT-1 and WHT-10 Liner Removal/Reline Description: Subcontractor shall provide all transportation, materials, equipment, supplies, tools, facilities, utilities, labor, coating inspectors, and supervision required to remove and replace the liners in tanks WHT-1 and WHT-10. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following: (1) The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or B of Subpart D;

196

SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

01 01 SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION: Hydroelectric Power Rate Increase for the Integrated System of Hydropower Projects. PROPOSED BY: Southwestern Power Administration. NUMBER AND TITLE OF THE CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION BEING APPLIED: ( 10 CFR 1021, Appendix B to Subpart D, 1-1-03 Edition, Part B4.3 - Electric power marketing rate changes. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS IN 10 CFR 1021.410(B): (1) The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix, A or B to Subpart D. (2) There are no extraordinary circumstances related to the proposal that may affect the Significance of the environmental effects of the proposal; and (3) The proposal is not "connected" to other actions with potentially significant impacts, is not related to

197

 

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Select the appropriate categorical exclusion(s) from Appendix B to Subpart D of 10 CFR Part 1021 (for Appendix (A) use bottom two pull-down menus) Select the appropriate categorical exclusion(s) from Appendix B to Subpart D of 10 CFR Part 1021 (for Appendix (A) use bottom two pull-down menus) The proposed action would involve preparing an Energy Efficiency Conservation Strategy with a detailed blueprint for the tribe's strategy/policy on how and where energy efficiency/conservation can be initiated. Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy Wisconsin Nov 23, 2009 Mary Martin Print Form for Records Submit via E-mail Billie Newland Digitally signed by Billie Newland DN: cn=Billie Newland, o=Energy Enterprise Solutions, ou, email=Billie.Newland@hq.doe.gov, c=US Date: 2009.11.24 15:14:20 -05'00'

198

U.S. Department of Energy NEPA Categorical Exclusion Determination Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Design and engineering of a "green" fire station Design and engineering of a "green" fire station Program Qr Field Office: EERE EECBG LV LQcatjQo(s) (City/CQunty/State):Maricopa AZ Proposed Action Description: Maricopa is funding the design and engineering W04'k on an energy efficient, "green" fire station, Categorical Exclusion{sl Applied: A9 -Information gathering, analysis, and dissemination 85.1 - Actions to conserve energy or waler For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, including the full text or each categorical exclusion, see Subpart 0 of 10 CFR Part 1021. Regulatory Requirements in 10 eFR 1021 AIO(b): (See full text in regulation) [Z)The proposal fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or B to 10 CFR Part 1021 . Subpart D.

199

U.S. Department of Energy Southwestern Power Administration  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Short Mountain Transmission Line Access Road Easement Acquisition Short Mountain Transmission Line Access Road Easement Acquisition Program or Field Office: Southwestern Power Administration Location(s) (City/County/State): Short Mountain, Leflore County, Oklahoma Proposed Action Description: Southwestern Power Administration proposes to obtain an easement to access a portion of transmission line located on Short Mountain in Leflore County, Oklahoma. Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied: l 0 CFR 102 l, Appendix B to Subpart D, Part B 1.24- Transfer, lease, disposition, or acquisition of interests in personal property or real property. For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, including the full text of each categorical exclusion, see Subpart D of 10 CFR Part 1021

200

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. BM-10-003  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

03 03 Title: Replace BM Oil/Water Separators Description: Subcontractor shall furnish all materials, tools, equipment, supplies, transportation, labor, supervision, and services required to replace the BM Oil/Water Separators. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following: (1) The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or B of Subpart D;

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "helium-48 cfr subpart" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

DOE | Office of Health, Safety and Security | Health and Safety  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

"Worker Safety and Health Program" FAQs "Worker Safety and Health Program" FAQs 10 CFR 851 “Worker Safety and Health Program" Frequently Asked Questions Updated October 19, 2010 Please Note: The responses to the following Frequently Asked Questions are not Official interpretations, only the Office of General Counsel may issue and interpretive ruling. Please see 10 CFR 851.7 and 851.8 for more information. Subpart A—General Provisions 851.1 Scope and purpose. 851.2 Exclusions. 851.3 Definitions. 851.4 Compliance order. 851.5 Enforcement. 851.6 Petitions for generally applicable rulemaking. 851.7 Request for a binding interpretive ruling. 851.8 Informal requests for information. Subpart B—Program Requirements 851.10 General requirements. 851.11 Development and approval of worker safety and health program.

202

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. BC-10-071  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Title: Replace BC Timber Pile Pipe Supports Description: Subcontractor shall provide all materials, equipment, tools, transportation, supervision, labor, mobile lifting equipment, and rigging needed to replace the timber piles and cross beams which support aboveground steel pipelines at BC. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following: (1) The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or B of Subpart D;

203

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

install pole-mounted safety light(s) at the Gore, Oklahoma install pole-mounted safety light(s) at the Gore, Oklahoma substation facility. PROPOSED BY: Southwestern Power Administration - U.S. Dept. of Energy DATE: September 1, 2011 NUMBERS AND TITLES OF THE CATEGORICAL EXCLUSIONS BEING APPLIED: 10 CFR 1021, Appendix B to Subpart 0, Part B2.3- Installation of equipment for personnel safety and health. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS IN 10 CFR 1021.410(B): (1) The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A& B to Subpart D. For classes of action listed in Appendix A or B, the following conditions are integral elements, i.e., to fit within a class, the proposal must riot: (a.) Threaten a violation of applicable statutory, regulatory, or permit requirements for environment, safety, and health, including DOE and/or Executive Orders;

204

Microsoft Word - MS-OM-1005 NEPA.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MS-OM-1005 MS-OM-1005 Title: FY 2012 Annual Site Subsidence Surveys Description: Subcontractor shall provide all labor, supervision, materials, equipment, transportation, and services necessary to perform a subsidence survey of the Bayou Choctaw, Big Hill, Bryan Mound and West Hackberry SPR sites. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following: (1) The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or B of Subpart D;

205

SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9/01 9/01 SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION: Hydroelectric Power Rate Increase for the Integrated System of Hydropower Projects. PROPOSED BY: Southwestern Power Administration. NUMBER AND TITLE OF THE CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION BEING APPLIED: ( 10 CFR 1021, Appendix B to Subpart D, 1-1-03 Edition, Part B4.3 - Electric power marketing rate changes. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS IN 10 CFR 1021.410(B): (1) The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix, A or B to Subpart D. (2) There are no extraordinary circumstances related to the proposal that may affect the Significance of the environmental effects of the proposal; and (3) The proposal is not "connected" to other actions with potentially significant impacts, is not related to

206

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. Multiple  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Multiple Multiple Title: ADAS System Life Cycle Support, 2012-2015 Description: Subcontractor shall provide annual telephone support and hardware/software update support for the ARINC AIM alarm display and annunciation system (ADAS) security systems used at the SPR from 2012-2015. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following: (1) The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or B of Subpart D;

207

 

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Select the appropriate categorical exclusion(s) from Appendix B to Subpart D of 10 CFR Part 1021 (for Appendix (A) use bottom two pull-down menus) Select the appropriate categorical exclusion(s) from Appendix B to Subpart D of 10 CFR Part 1021 (for Appendix (A) use bottom two pull-down menus) The Tribe proposes to retain the services of a technical consultant for the duration of the grant for assistance in all phases of their EECBG activities, and to provide expertise when necessary. Anticipated support includes assistance with the development of the tribe's Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy, assistance to the new Energy Auditor by providing information and technical support, and helping to identify retrofit lighting for Tribal buildings and low-income housing. The consultant will also help the project administrator and other Tribal representatives to implement the overall EECBG activities.

208

1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Samsung originally filed its submission as an Application for Samsung originally filed its submission as an Application for Waiver under 10 C.F.R. § 430.27. However, it has been determined that Samsung's request for relief is more appropriately considered as an Application for Exception under 10 C.F.R. Part 1003, Subpart B-Exceptions. Samsung has agreed to this procedural approach. See Memorandum of July 20, 2007 Telephone Conversation. Accordingly, we will consider its application under that Subpart and will refer to its submission as an Application for Exception or exception request. July 26, 2007 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Name of Case: Samsung Electronics America Date of Filing: July 16, 2007 Case Number: TEE-0047 This Decision and Order considers an Application for Exception

209

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. BH-09-130  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

130 130 Title: Replacement of BH Deep Anode Ground Bed Site for Cavern 114 Description: Subcontractor shall provide all materials, tools, equipment, supplies, transportation, facilities, labor, supervision, and services required for the installation of a deep anode ground bed site at BM Cavern 114. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following: (1) The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or B of Subpart D;

210

 

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Select the appropriate categorical exclusion(s) from Appendix B to Subpart D of 10 CFR Part 1021 (for Appendix (A) use bottom two pull-down menus) Select the appropriate categorical exclusion(s) from Appendix B to Subpart D of 10 CFR Part 1021 (for Appendix (A) use bottom two pull-down menus) Developing an energy efficiency strategy and retaining technical consultants for the city of Rock Island OCRWM Rock Island Energy Efficiency Retrofits Illinois, Apr 29, 2010 Kathryn Knapp Digitally signed by Kathryn Knapp DN: cn=Kathryn Knapp, o=DOE, ou=OCRWM, email=kathryn_knapp@ymp.gov, c=US Date: 2010.04.29 10:57:04 -07'00' Print Form for Records Submit to Website Submit via Email X- A11 - Technical advice and assistance to organizations X- A9 - Information gathering/data analysis/document preparation/dissemination Submit to Webmaster

211

Microsoft Word - SPR Site Subsidence Surveys 2013-2017.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Subsidence Surveys, 2013-2017 Subsidence Surveys, 2013-2017 Description: Subcontractor shall provide all labor, supervision, materials, equipment, transportation, and services necessary to perform a subsidence survey of the Bayou Choctaw, Big Hill, Bryan Mound and West Hackberry SPR sites. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following: (1) The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or B of Subpart D;

212

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. WH-10-004  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

04 04 Title: WH Annual PSV Testing Description: Subcontractor shall provide a mobile van with all labor, material, equipment, transportation, and supervision required to perform annual testing of all pressure safety valves at WH. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following: (1) The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or B of Subpart D;

213

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

'u ", lt~Fs::::N 'u ", lt~Fs::::N CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION: Southwestern Power Administration proposes to construct a maintenance garage for heavy vehicles and equipment at the Springfield, Missouri facility. PROPOSED BY: Southwestern Power Administration- U.S. Dept. of Energy DATE: December 7,2010 NUMBERS AND TITLES OF THE CATEGORICAL EXCLUSIONS BEING APPLIED: 10 CFR 1021, Appendix B to Subpart D, Part B1.15- Siting, construction or modification of support structures within or contiguous to an already developed area. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS IN 10 CFR 1021.410(B): (1) The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A & B to Subpart D. For classes of action listed in Appendix A or B, the following conditions are integral elements, i.e., to fit within a class, the

214

U.S. Department of Energy Southwestern Power Administration  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transmission Line 3016 Access Road Acquisition Project Transmission Line 3016 Access Road Acquisition Project Program or Field Office: Southwestern Power Administration Location(s) (City/County/State): Porum, Muskogee County, Oklahoma Proposed Action Description: Southwestern Power Administration proposes to aquire an access road easement. This access road will enable vehicles and equipment to maintain and operate portion of transmission line 3016 near the structure 3 I area. Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied: 10 CFR l 021 , Appendix B to Subpart D, Part B 1.24- Transfer, lease, disposition, or acquisition of interests in personal property or real property. For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, including the full text of each categorical exclusion, see Subpart D of I 0 CFR Part 1021

215

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Entergy Arkansas, Inc. (Entergy) proposes to establish an interconnection between the system of Southwestern Entergy Arkansas, Inc. (Entergy) proposes to establish an interconnection between the system of Southwestern Power Administration and the system of Entergy in Carroll County, Arkansas. The interconnection would require Entergy to construct a new switching station at the interconnection site in addition to an approximately 5 mile length of transmission line. PROPOSED BY: Southwestern Power Administration - U.S. Dept. of Energy DATE: April 11,2011 NUMBERS AND TIT!-ES OF THE CATEGORICAL EXCLUSIONS BEING APPLIED: 10 CFR 1021, Appendix B to Subpart D, Part B4.12- Construction of electric powerlines approximately 10 miles in length or less, not integrating major new sources. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS IN 10 CFR 1021.410(B): (1) The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A & B to Subpart D. For classes

216

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION' National Nuclear Security Administration/Kansas City Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DETERMINATION' DETERMINATION' National Nuclear Security Administration/Kansas City Site Office A. Description of Proposed Action: (lor 2 sentences; include title, general activities, location, timeframe) Kansas City Plant - Project 1712 Repair OF002 CIPP Liner Near AICO Inlet: repair Outfall No. 002 using an open cut replacement of the southern section, a slip lining of the northern section, and a manhole placed at the intersection of those sections. October 2010 thru April 201 1. B. Number and Title of the Categorical Exclusion Being Applied: (See text in 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D.) B6.1 Small scale, short term cleanup actions under RCRA, Atomic Energy Act, or other authorities C. Regulatory Requirements in 10CFR 1021.410 (b): (See full text in regulation.) (1) The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or B to Subpart D.

217

All General Counsel Reports | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 11, 2011 October 11, 2011 Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-031 This is a request by PARKER HANNIFIN CORPORATION for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FE0005508. October 7, 2011 Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-026 This is a request by US SYNTHETIC CORPORATION for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0003633. October 6, 2011 Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-052 This is a request by 3M COMPANY for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0000456. October 6, 2011 INTERPRETATION REGARDING EXEMPTION RELIEF UNDER 10 C.F.R. PART 820, SUBPART E, EXEMPTION RELIEF, AND NON-COMPLIANT 'DOCUMENTED SAFETY ANALYSES' SUBJECT TO 10 C.F.R. PART 830, NUCLEAR SAFETY MANAGEMENT, SUBPART B, SAFETY

218

Overview - WIPP Effluent Monitoring  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Overview of the WIPP Effluent Monitoring Program Compliance with Title 40 CFR Part 191, Subpart A Environmental Standards for Management and Storage L. Frank-Supka, D. J. Harward, S. C. Casey May 2005 INTRODUCTION This document provides an overview of the effluent air monitoring activities at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), in Carlsbad, New Mexico. The WIPP Effluent Monitoring Program is designed to comply with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) radiation protection standards for management and storage of spent nuclear fuel, high-level radioactive waste and transuranic (TRU)-waste at the WIPP. The standards issued by the EPA are contained in Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 191, Subpart A. The standards require the

219

Title 10, Part 710 - Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

e-CFR Data is current as of April 7, 2008 e-CFR Data is current as of April 7, 2008 Title 10: Energy PART 710-CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR DETERMINING ELIGIBILITY FOR ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED MATTER OR SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL Subpart A-General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material Source: 59 FR 35185, July 8, 1994, unless otherwise noted. General Provisions § 710.1 Purpose. (a) This subpart establishes the criteria, procedures, and methods for resolving questions concerning the eligibility of individuals who are employed by, or applicants for employment with, Department of Energy (DOE) contractors, agents, and access permittees, individuals who are DOE employees or applicants for DOE employment, and other persons designated by the Secretary of Energy, for access to Restricted Data

220

U.S. Department of Energy NEPA Categorical Exclusion Determination Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Crittenden City Facilities Re-Roofing Crittenden City Facilities Re-Roofing Program or Field Office: EERE RW EECBG Location(s) (City/CQunty/State):Crittenden County AK Proposed Action Description: Crittenden proposes to re-roof a number of city facilities to increase energy efficiency, NOT including the Courthouse which is on the Historic Register. Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied: 85.1 - Actions to conserve energy or water For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, including the full text of each categorical exclusion, see Subpart D of 10 eFR Part 1021 . Regulatory Requirements in 10 CFR 1021.41 O(b): (See full text in regulation) [Z]The proposal fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or B to 10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart D.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "helium-48 cfr subpart" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

untitled  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

BC-MM-817 BC-MM-817 Title: Relocation of BC Entry Portal Building Description: Subcontractor shall furnish all materials, equipment, supplies, tools, labor, supervision, services, storage, and transportation required to relocate the BC Entry Portal Building. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 10211 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following: (1) The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or B of Subpart D;

222

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, 2012 5, 2012 CX-009659: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Actions to Conserve Energy or Water under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 5, 2012 CX-009658: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Small-Scale Research and Development, Laboratory Operations, and Pilot Projects under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 5, 2012 CX-009657: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Site

223

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

71 - 23080 of 26,764 results. 71 - 23080 of 26,764 results. Download CX-009669: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Relocation of Buildings under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B1.22 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/cx-009669-categorical-exclusion-determination Download CX-009670: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Disconnection of Utilities under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B1.27 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/cx-009670-categorical-exclusion-determination

224

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 99-01:Enforcement of 10 CFR Part 830.120  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enforcement of 10 CFR Part Enforcement of 10 CFR Part 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule)for Facilities Below Hazard Category III Enforcement Guidance Supplement 99-01:Enforcement of 10 CFR Part 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule)for Facilities Below Hazard Category III Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedures for Enforcement, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity for the Office of Enforcement and Investigation (EH Enforcement) periodically to issue clarifying guidance regarding the processes used in its enforcement activities. During the past 18 months, EH Enforcement has identified a number of examples in which both DOE and contractor organizations have incorrectly exempted activities fromapplicability of the DOE Quality Assurance Rule 10 CFR 830.120 (QA Rule). The contractors excluded these activities on the

225

DOE 10 CFR Part 429, Docket Number: EERE-2010-BT-CE-0014, RIN  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE 10 CFR Part 429, Docket Number: EERE-2010-BT-CE-0014, DOE 10 CFR Part 429, Docket Number: EERE-2010-BT-CE-0014, RIN 1904-AC23, Federal Register Vol. 76, No. 75, 21813-15 (Tuesday, April 19, 2011), Notice of Proposed Rule for Energy Conservation Program: Certification, Compliance, and Enforcement fo DOE 10 CFR Part 429, Docket Number: EERE-2010-BT-CE-0014, RIN 1904-AC23, Federal Register Vol. 76, No. 75, 21813-15 (Tuesday, April 19, 2011), Notice of Proposed Rule for Energy Conservation Program: Certification, Compliance, and Enforcement fo DOE 10 CFR Part 429, Docket Number: EERE-2010-BT-CE-0014, RIN 1904-AC23, Federal Register Vol. 76, No. 75, 21813-15 (Tuesday, April 19, 2011), Notice of Proposed Rule for Energy Conservation Program: Certification, Compliance, and Enforcement for Consumer Products and Commercial and Industrial Equipment.

226

Ruling 1995-1; Ruling concerning 10 CFR Parts 830 and 835  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10 CFR PART 830 10 CFR PART 830 10 CFR PART 835 Office of the General Counsel; Ruling 1995-1; Ruling concerning 10 CFR Parts 830 (Nuclear Safety Management) and 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection) AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of Ruling 1995-1. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) has issued Ruling 1995-1 which interprets certain regulatory provisions relating to DOE's nuclear safety requirements. This Ruling is intended to be a generally applicable clarification that addresses questions concerning the applicability and effect of these provisions. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ben McRae, Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Civilian Nuclear Programs, Room 6A 167, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Ave., SW, Washington DC 20585; telephone (202) 586-6975.

227

10 CFR - Energy | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

10 CFR - Energy 10 CFR - Energy Grants & Contracts Support Grants & Contracts Support Home About Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) DOE National Laboratory Announcements Grants Process Grants Policy and Guidance Grant/Cooperative Agreement Forms FAQs Resources Contract Information Contact Information Grants & Contracts Support U.S. Department of Energy SC-43/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 301-903-2859 E: sc.grantsandcontracts@science.doe.gov Grants Policy and Guidance 10 CFR - Energy Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Part 605 - The Office of Energy Research Financial Assistance Program September 3, 1992 NOTE: In FY 1999, the Office of Energy Research's name changed to the Office of Science. The program described in this regulation 10 CFR Part 605

228

DOE Order Self Study Modules - 29 CFR 1910.120 Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

29 CFR 1910.120 29 CFR 1910.120 HAZARDOUS WASTE OPERATIONS AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CENTER Change No: 0 29 CFR 1910.120 Level: Familiar Date: 3/14/05 1 29 CFR 1910.120 HAZARDOUS WASTE OPERATIONS AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE FAMILIAR LEVEL _________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources, you will be able to perform the following: 1. Discuss clean-up operations required by the regulation. 2. Discuss corrective actions during clean-up operations covered by the resource conservation and recovery act (RCRA). 3. Discuss operations involving hazardous wastes that are conducted at treatment, storage, and disposal (TSD) facilities.

229

6450-01-P], DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, 10 CFR Part 830, Nuclear Safety  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6450-01-P], DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, 10 CFR Part 830, Nuclear Safety 6450-01-P], DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, 10 CFR Part 830, Nuclear Safety Management, AGENCY: Department of Energy (DOE). 6450-01-P], DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, 10 CFR Part 830, Nuclear Safety Management, AGENCY: Department of Energy (DOE). The Department of Energy (DOE) has issued Ruling 1995-1 which interprets certain regulatory provisions relating to DOE's nuclear safety requirements. This Ruling is intended to be a generally applicable clarification that addresses questions concerning the applicability and effect of these provisions. Ruling 1995-1; Ruling concerning 10 CFR Parts 830 and 835 More Documents & Publications Appendix A. Notice of Inquiry: Preparation of Report to Congress on Price-Anderson Act. 62 Federal Register 68,272 (December 31, 1997) Report to Congress on the Price-Anderson Act

230

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 99-01: Enforcement of 10 CFR Part 830.120  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enforcement of 10 CFR Part Enforcement of 10 CFR Part 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule) for Facilities below Hazard Category III Enforcement Guidance Supplement 99-01: Enforcement of 10 CFR Part 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule) for Facilities below Hazard Category III Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedures for Enforcement, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity for the Office of Enforcement and Investigation (EH Enforcement) periodically to issue clarifying guidance regarding the processes used in its enforcement activities. During the past 18 months, EH Enforcement has identified a number of examples in which both DOE and contractor organizations have incorrectly exempted activities from applicability of the DOE Quality Assurance Rule 10 CFR 830.120 (QA Rule). The contractors excluded these activities on the

231

10 C.F.R. Part 851, Worker Safety and Health Program - February 9, 2006 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 C.F.R. Part 851, Worker Safety and Health Program - February 9, 0 C.F.R. Part 851, Worker Safety and Health Program - February 9, 2006 10 C.F.R. Part 851, Worker Safety and Health Program - February 9, 2006 February 9, 2006 10 C.F.R. Part 851 - Worker Safety and Health Program Final Rule. Pages 75-92 without preamble § 851.1 Scope and purpose. The worker safety and health requirements in this part govern the conduct of contractor activities at DOE sites. This part establishes the: Requirements for a worker safety and health program that reduces or prevents occupational injuries, illnesses, and accidental losses by providing DOE contractors and their workers with safe and healthful workplaces at DOE sites; and Procedures for investigating whether a violation of a requirement of this part has occurred, for determining the nature and extent of any such

232

July 17, 2008; HSS/Union Working Group Meeting, Safety Standards, 10 CFR 851 - Information Package  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10 CFR 851 / Safety Standards 10 CFR 851 / Safety Standards July 17, 2008 July 17, 2008 ds 06-24-08 Draft HSS/Union Working Group Meeting July 17, 2008 1:00 - 4:00 pm EST FORS 7E-069 Call-in: 301-903-9197 SUBJECT: SAFETY STANDARDS / 10 CFR 851 Core Union Working Groups Safety Standards: Metal Trades Department AFL-CIO - Lead International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Association (OPCMIA) 10 CFR 851: United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union (USW) - Lead Building &Construction Trades Department Center for Construction Research &Training (BCTD CPWR) International Guards Union of America (IGUA) International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE)

233

29 C.F.R. 1960.28: Employee Reports of Unsafe or Unhealthful Working  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

29 C.F.R. 1960.28: Employee Reports of Unsafe or Unhealthful 29 C.F.R. 1960.28: Employee Reports of Unsafe or Unhealthful Working Conditions 29 C.F.R. 1960.28: Employee Reports of Unsafe or Unhealthful Working Conditions Stakeholders: DOE employees and other federal employees Scope: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration's 29 C.F.R. 1960.28 details the appropriate procedure for employees seeking to file employee reports regarding hazardous and/or unhealthful working conditions to the appropriate authorities. Summary: Any and all federal employees have the right to make a report regarding an unsafe working condition to the appropriate authority within OSHA. If requested, this report and the identity of the employee(s) that authored it will be kept confidential and will only be reviewed by the Secretary and authorized representatives

234

Microsoft Word - Alcoa_extension_No2_CX.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 22, 2012 June 22, 2012 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Mark Miller Account Executive, Long-Term Sales and Purchases - PT-5 Proposed Action: Amendment Number 2 to the Alcoa Power Sales Agreement Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): A2 - Clarifying or administrative contract actions Location: Portland, OR and Ferndale, WA Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA)

235

Microsoft Word - DRAFT Cowlitz Longview CX memo 080910.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0, 2010 0, 2010 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Amit Sinha Project Manager - TEP-CSB-2 Proposed Action: Transmission, Fiber, and Relay Upgrades at Cowlitz, Longview Annex, and Cardwell Substations Budget Information: Work Order 00004866, Task 04 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B4.6 Additions or modifications to electric power transmission facilities that would not affect the environment

236

Microsoft Word - CX-RiceFlatsSiteMaintenanceFY12_WEB.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

12, 2012 12, 2012 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Steve Lowder Project Manager - TESM-AMPN-2 Proposed Action: Rice Flats Electrode Site Maintenance and Inspection Project Budget Information: Work Order #00219387 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B1.3 Routine maintenance activities Location: The proposed project area is approximately seven miles southeast of The Dalles,

237

CONFIRMATORY SURVEY RESULTS FOR PORTIONS OF THE ABB COMBUSTION ENGINEERING SITE IN WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT DURING THE FALL OF 2011  

SciTech Connect

From the mid-1950s until mid-2000, the Combustion Engineering, Inc. (CE) site in Windsor, Connecticut (Figure A-1) was involved in the research, development, engineering, production, and servicing of nuclear fuels, systems, and services. The site is currently undergoing decommissioning that will lead to license termination and unrestricted release in accordance with the requirements of the License Termination Rule in 10 CFR Part 20, Subpart E. Asea Brown Boveri Incorporated (ABB) has been decommissioning the CE site since 2001.

Wade C. Adams

2011-12-09T23:59:59.000Z

238

DOE-STD-1104-2009  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

DOE-STD-1104-2009: Review and Approval of Nuclear Facility Safety Basis and Safety Design Basis Documents Superseding DOE-STD-1104-96 This Standard describes a framework and criteria for reviewing safety basis documents that will support DOE approval of the documents as required by 10 CFR 830 Subpart B and DOE-STD-1189-2008 (as invoked by DOE Order 413.3A, Chg 1) including preparation of SERs and SVRs for nuclear facilities.

239

Questions and answers based on revised 10 CFR Part 20  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

NUREG/CR-6204 is a collection of questions and answers that were originally issued in seven sets and which pertain to revised 10 CFR Part 20. The questions came from both outside and within the NRC. The answers were compiled and provided by NRC staff within the offices of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Nuclear Regulatory Research, the Office of State Programs, and the five regional offices. Although all of the questions and answers have been reviewed by attorneys in the NRC Office of the General Counsel, they do not constitute official legal interpretations relevant to revised 10 CFR Part 20. The questions and answers do, however, reflect NRC staff decisions and technical options on aspects of the revised 10 CFR Part 20 regulatory requirements. This NUREG is being made available to encourage communication among the public, industry, and NRC staff concerning the major revisions of the NRC`s standards for protection against radiation.

Borges, T.; Stafford, R.S.; Lu, P.Y. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States); Carter, D. [Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (United States)

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

240

Environmental Assessment for Direct Final Rule, 10 CFR 434, Energy Standards for New Federal Commercial and High-Rise Multi-FamilyResidential BuildingsŽ and 10 CFR 435, Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Residential Low-Rise Residential Buildings"  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Proposed Rule, 10 CFR 433, Proposed Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Sustainable Design and Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and High-Rise Multi-Family Residential Buildings" and 10 CFR 435, "Sustainable Design and Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Residential Low-Rise Residential Buildings" (DOE/EA-1463) 2 SUMMARY The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared this Environmental Assessment (EA) for DOE's Proposed Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Sustainable Design and Energy Efficiency Standards for the Design and Construction of New Federal Commercial and High-Rise Multi-Family Residential Buildings" and 10 CFR 435, "Sustainable Design and Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Residential Low- Rise Residential Buildings". Section 305(a) of the Energy Conservation and Production

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "helium-48 cfr subpart" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Draft Environmental Assessment for Direct Final Rule, 10 CFR 434, Energy Standards for New Federal Commercial and High-Rise High-Rise Multi-FamilyResidential BuildingsŽ and 10 CFR 435, Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Residential Low-Rise Re  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Environmental Assessment for Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and High-Rise Multi-Family Residential Buildings" and 10 CFR 435, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Residential Low-Rise Residential Buildings" (DOE/EA-1463) Environmental Assessment for Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and High-Rise Multi-Family Residential Buildings" and 10 CFR 435, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Residential Low-Rise Residential Buildings" (DOE/EA-1463) SUMMARY The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared this Environmental Assessment (EA) for DOE's Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for

242

Environmental Assessment for Direct Final Rule, 10 CFR 434, Energy Standards for New Federal Commercial and High-Rise Multi-FamilyResidential BuildingsŽ and 10 CFR 435, Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Residential Low-Rise Residential Buildings"  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Proposed Rule, 10 CFR 433, Proposed Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Sustainable Design and Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and High-Rise Multi-Family Residential Buildings" and 10 CFR 435, "Sustainable Design and Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Residential Low-Rise Residential Buildings" (DOE/EA-1463) 2 SUMMARY The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared this Environmental Assessment (EA) for DOE's Proposed Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Sustainable Design and Energy Efficiency Standards for the Design and Construction of New Federal Commercial and High-Rise Multi-Family Residential Buildings" and 10 CFR 435, "Sustainable Design and Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Residential Low- Rise Residential Buildings". Section 305(a) of the Energy Conservation and Production

243

Notices  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

72 Federal Register 72 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 237 / Friday, December 9, 2011 / Notices § 3.1000(b) through (e) of 40 CFR part 3, subpart D provides special procedures for program revisions and modifications to allow electronic reporting, to be used at the option of the state, tribe or local government in place of procedures available under existing program- specific authorization regulations. An application submitted under the Subpart D procedures must show that the state, tribe or local government has sufficient legal authority to implement the electronic reporting components of the programs covered by the application and will use electronic document receiving systems that meet the applicable Subpart D requirements. On July 20, 2011, the Indiana Department of the Environmental

244

FAL 2010-03, Strategic Integrated Procurement Enterprise System (STRIPES)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Date 01/08/10 ASSISTANCE LETTER NO. FAL 2010-03 Date 01/08/10 This Acquisition/Financial Assistance Letter is issued under the authority of the DOE and NNSA Senior Procurement Executives. I I Subject: Strategic Integrated Procurement Enterprise System (STRIPES) I References: I OMB M-00-10 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Procedures and Guidance on Implementing the Government Paperwork Elimination Act FAR Subpart 4.5 Electronic Commerce in Contracting FAR Subpart 4.8 Government Contract Files FAR Subpart 7.1 Acquisition Plans DOE 0 200.1 Information Management Program 10 CFR 600 Department of Energy (DOE) Financial Assistance Rules When is this Acquisition Letter (AL)/Financial Assistance Letter (FAL) Effective? I This ALIFAL is effective upon deployment of STRIPES at each contracting activity.

245

6450-01-P, DOE 10 CFR Parts 430 and 431, Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-CE-0014  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6450-01-P, DOE 10 CFR Parts 430 and 431, Docket No. 6450-01-P, DOE 10 CFR Parts 430 and 431, Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-CE-0014 RIN 1904-AC23, Draft Submission to Federal Register, Notice of Revisions to Energy Efficiency Enforcement Regulations, Request for Information/comment. 6450-01-P, DOE 10 CFR Parts 430 and 431, Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-CE-0014 RIN 1904-AC23, Draft Submission to Federal Register, Notice of Revisions to Energy Efficiency Enforcement Regulations, Request for Information/comment. 6450-01-P, DOE 10 CFR Parts 430 and 431, Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-CE-0014 RIN 1904-AC23, Draft Submission to Federal Register, Notice of Revisions to Energy Efficiency Enforcement Regulations, Request for Information/comment. Request for Information (RFI); request for comment regarding DOE's plan to expand and revise its existing energy efficiency enforcement regulations

246

DOE Order Self Study Modules - 29 CFR 1910.147, The Control Of Hazardous Energy (Lockout/Tagout)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CFR 1910.147 CFR 1910.147 Familiar Level June 2011 1 June 2011 29 CFR 1910.147 THE CONTROL OF HAZARDOUS ENERGY (LOCKOUT/TAGOUT) FAMILIAR LEVEL ___________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources, you will be able to answer the following questions: 1. What is the purpose of implementing 29 CFR 1910.147? 2. What is the definition of the following terms?  authorized employee  hot tap  tagout  lockout  lockout device  energy isolating device  tagout device 3. What are the conditions that require a contractor to retrain employees in lockout/tagout procedures? 4. What are the contractor requirements for personnel lockout/tagout training, and what

247

Environmental Assessment for Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and Multi-Family High-Rise Residential Buildings" (DOE/EA-1918)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environmental Assessment for Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Environmental Assessment for Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and Multi-Family High-Rise Residential Buildings" (DOE/EA-1918) June 28, 2013 1 Environmental Assessment for Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and Multi-Family High-Rise Residential Buildings" (DOE/EA-1918) SUMMARY The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared this environmental assessment (EA) for DOE's Final Rule, 10 CFR Part 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and Multi-Family High-Rise Residential Buildings". The Final Rule updates the baseline standard in 10 CFR 433 to the latest private sector standard based on cost-effectiveness and DOE's determination that energy efficiency has

248

Environmental Assessment for Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and Multi-Family High-Rise Residential Buildings" (DOE/EA-1918)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Assessment for Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Environmental Assessment for Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and Multi-Family High-Rise Residential Buildings" (DOE/EA-1918) June 28, 2013 1 Environmental Assessment for Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and Multi-Family High-Rise Residential Buildings" (DOE/EA-1918) SUMMARY The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared this environmental assessment (EA) for DOE's Final Rule, 10 CFR Part 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and Multi-Family High-Rise Residential Buildings". The Final Rule updates the baseline standard in 10 CFR 433 to the latest private sector standard based on cost-effectiveness and DOE's determination that energy efficiency has

249

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 9, 2006 Part III Department of Energy 10 CFR Parts 600 and 603 Assistance Regulations; Final Rule VerDate Aug2005 17:47 May 08, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\09MYR3.SGM 09MYR3 jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES3 27158 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Parts 600 and 603 RIN 1991-AB72 Assistance Regulations AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) is adopting, with minor changes, the interim final rule published on November 15, 2005, that established a new part to the DOE assistance regulations and revised 10 CFR part 600, subpart A to conform with the new part. The new part establishes policies and

250

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION! National Nuclear Security Administration/Kansas City Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DETERMINATION! DETERMINATION! National Nuclear Security Administration/Kansas City Site Office A. Description of Proposed Action: (lor 2 sentences; include title, general activities, location, timeframe) Kansas City Plant - Project 1615 - Building 16 PCB Decontamination: Areas within Building 16 that exhibit PCB contamination above the 10 ug/l00cm2 exposure threshold, as defined by the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) (40 CFR Part 761), would be addressed under this project. February 2014 thru September 2014. B. Number and Title of the Categorical Exclusion Being Applied: (See text in 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D.) B 1.17 - Removal of polychlorinated biphenyl-containing items from buildings, other above ground locations. C. Regulatory Requirements in 10 CFR 1021.410 (b): (See full text in regulation.)

251

Technical Support Document for the National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Rulemaking, 10 CFR part 1021 Page 1 Final Rulemaking, 10 CFR part 1021 Page 1 Department of Energy Technical Support Document for the National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures Final Rule September 27, 2011 This Technical Support Document and the preambles to the Department of Energy"s (DOE"s) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (76 FR 214) and final rule provide the supporting basis for the changes being made to DOE"s National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Procedures. In this Technical Support Document, DOE presents each of the changes to its NEPA implementing regulations (10 CFR part 1021, Subparts B, C, and D) and provides supplementary support for the changes. The left column of the table below shows the changes to the existing regulations and the right column provides

252

EA-1778: Proposed Rule, 10 CFR 433 and 435, Energy Conservation and Fossil Fuel-Generated Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of DOE's Proposed Rule, 10 CFR Part 433, Energy Conservation and Fossil Fuel-Generated Energy Consumption Reduction Standards for the Design and Construction of New Federal Commercial and Multi-Family High-Rise Residential Buildings and 10 CFR Part 435, Energy Conservation and Fossil Fuel-Generated Energy Consumption Reduction Standards for the Design and Construction of New Federal Low-Rise Residential Buildings.

253

JM to Revise DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830, Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The revision to DOE G 414.1-4 will conform to the revised DOE O 414.1D and incorporate new information and lessons learned since 2005, including information ...

2013-07-17T23:59:59.000Z

254

DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830, Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This Guide provides acceptable methods for implementing the safety software quality assurance requirements of draft DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance. Certified ...

2005-06-17T23:59:59.000Z

255

Environmental assessment for issuance of 10 CFR Parts 834 and 835  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy (DOE) is proposing that two rules for radiation protection be included in Title 10 of the US Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). These proposed rule are 10 CFR Part 834, Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment,'' and 10 CFR Part 835. Radiation Protection for Occupational Workers.'' Both would apply to normal operations at all DOE and DOE contractor facilities where ionizing radiation exposure could occur. The proposed rules are based on existing DOE Orders for radiation protection of workers, the public, and the environment. Proposed rule 10 CFR Part 834 essentially incorporates Order DOE 5400.5, Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment'' (DOE 1990a), which was issued on February 8, 1990. Proposed rule 10 CFR Part 835 incorporates DOE 5480.11, Radiation Protection for Occupational Workers'' (DOE 1988a), which was issued on December 21, 1988. The intent in codifying these Orders is to provide the DOE with regulations for protection of members of the public and radiation workers against ionizing radiation and to enhance enforcement of the requirements under the Price Anderson Amendments Act (PAAA 1988). The proposed rules are designed to preserve the radiation protection provisions of the DOE Orders. The purpose of this environmental assessment (EA) is to provide an analysis that can be used to determine whether the proposed action -- promulgation of proposed 10 CFR Part 834 and 10 CFR Part 835 -- significantly affects the quality of the environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA 1969). This EA identifies alternatives to the proposed action and examines what impact each of the alternatives would have on environmental quality.

Not Available

1992-01-22T23:59:59.000Z

256

Environmental assessment for issuance of 10 CFR Parts 834 and 835  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy (DOE) is proposing that two rules for radiation protection be included in Title 10 of the US Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). These proposed rule are 10 CFR Part 834, ``Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment,`` and 10 CFR Part 835. ``Radiation Protection for Occupational Workers.`` Both would apply to normal operations at all DOE and DOE contractor facilities where ionizing radiation exposure could occur. The proposed rules are based on existing DOE Orders for radiation protection of workers, the public, and the environment. Proposed rule 10 CFR Part 834 essentially incorporates Order DOE 5400.5, ``Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment`` (DOE 1990a), which was issued on February 8, 1990. Proposed rule 10 CFR Part 835 incorporates DOE 5480.11, ``Radiation Protection for Occupational Workers`` (DOE 1988a), which was issued on December 21, 1988. The intent in codifying these Orders is to provide the DOE with regulations for protection of members of the public and radiation workers against ionizing radiation and to enhance enforcement of the requirements under the Price Anderson Amendments Act (PAAA 1988). The proposed rules are designed to preserve the radiation protection provisions of the DOE Orders. The purpose of this environmental assessment (EA) is to provide an analysis that can be used to determine whether the proposed action -- promulgation of proposed 10 CFR Part 834 and 10 CFR Part 835 -- significantly affects the quality of the environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA 1969). This EA identifies alternatives to the proposed action and examines what impact each of the alternatives would have on environmental quality.

Not Available

1992-01-22T23:59:59.000Z

257

Environmental assessment for amendments to 10 CFR Part 835  

SciTech Connect

This proposed amendment will modify the scope of 10 CFR 835 to explicitly exclude the transportation of radioactive material conducted in conformance with the Department of Transportation regulations, certain activities conducted on foreign soil, add standards for area posting and sealed radioactive source control, and add a removable surface radioactivity value for tritium.

NONE

1997-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

258

Draft Environmental Assessment for Direct Final Rule, 10 CFR 434, "Energy Standards for New Federal Commercial and High-Rise High-Rise Multi-FamilyResidential Buildings" and 10 CFR 435, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Residential Low-Rise Re  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

"Energy "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and High-Rise Multi-Family Residential Buildings" and 10 CFR 435, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Residential Low-Rise Residential Buildings" Baseline Standards Update (DOE/EA-1871) March 16, 2011 2 Environmental Assessment for Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and High-Rise Multi-Family Residential Buildings" and 10 CFR 435, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Residential Low-Rise Residential Buildings" Baseline Standards Update

259

DOE 10 CFR Part 431 EERE-2010-BT-TP-0036 RIN 1904-AC-38 Submission of Comments by Howe Corporation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Comments to the following DOE Proposed Rules:10 CFR Part 431[Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-TP-0036]RIN 1904-AC38Energy Efficiency Program for Certain Commercial and Industrial Equipment: Test Procedures...

260

Confirmation of 10 CFR Part 830, nuclear safety rule (66 FR 19717), Fed Reg  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Confirmation of 10 CFR Part 830, nuclear safety rule (66 FR 19717), Confirmation of 10 CFR Part 830, nuclear safety rule (66 FR 19717), Fed Reg 4/17/01 Confirmation of 10 CFR Part 830, nuclear safety rule (66 FR 19717), Fed Reg 4/17/01 In accordance with the memorandum of January 20, 2001, from the Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff, entitled ''Regulatory Review Plan,'' published in the Federal Register on January 24, 2001 (66 FR 7702), DOE temporarily delayed for 60 days (66 FR 8746, February 2, 2001) the effective date of the rule entitled ''Nuclear Safety Management'' published in the Federal Register on January 10, 2001 (66 FR 1810). DOE has now completed its review of that regulation, and does not intend to initiate any further rulemaking action to modify its provisions and confirms the effective date of April 10,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "helium-48 cfr subpart" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 99-03: Limitation of 10 CFR Part 830 to  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

: Limitation of 10 CFR Part : Limitation of 10 CFR Part 830 to Equipment Referenced in the Safety Analysis Report Enforcement Guidance Supplement 99-03: Limitation of 10 CFR Part 830 to Equipment Referenced in the Safety Analysis Report Recently this Office received a reply to a Preliminary Notice of Violation (PNOV), although not denying any facts or conclusions in the PNOV and agreeing to pay the full imposed Civil Penalty, included arguments that some of the equipment cited in the PNOV was not, in their view, subject to the requirements of Part 830. The contractor argued that only equipment referenced in the Safety Analysis Report (SAR), Technical Safety Requirements (TSR) or Technical Specifications should come under the requirements of Part 830. The attached is DOE's response to denying that

262

10 CFR Part 605 | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Funding Opportunities » Grants & Contracts Funding Opportunities » Grants & Contracts Support Home » Grants Policy and Guidance » 10 CFR Part 605 Grants & Contracts Support Grants & Contracts Support Home About Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) DOE National Laboratory Announcements Grants Process Grants Policy and Guidance Grant/Cooperative Agreement Forms FAQs Resources Contract Information Contact Information Grants & Contracts Support U.S. Department of Energy SC-43/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 301-903-2859 E: sc.grantsandcontracts@science.doe.gov Grants Policy and Guidance 10 CFR Part 605 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page NOTE: In FY 1999, the Office of Energy Research's name changed to the Office of Science. The program described in this regulation 10 CFR Part 605

263

Nuclear Safety Management, Final Rule amending 10 CFR Part 830 (66 FR  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Management, Final Rule amending 10 CFR Part 830 (66 Management, Final Rule amending 10 CFR Part 830 (66 FR 1810), Federal Register (Fed Reg), 1/10/2001 Nuclear Safety Management, Final Rule amending 10 CFR Part 830 (66 FR 1810), Federal Register (Fed Reg), 1/10/2001 SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) adopts, with minor changes, the interim final rule published on October 10, 2000, to amend the DOE Nuclear Safety Management regulations. EFFECTIVE DATE: This final rule is effective on February 9, 2001. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Black, Director, Office of Nuclear and Facility Safety Policy, 270CC, Department of Energy, 19901 Germantown Road, Germantown, MD 20874; telephone: 301-903-3465; email: Richard.Black@eh.doe.gov SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Introduction and Summary On October 10, 2000, the Department of Energy (DOE) published an

264

EA-1918: Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

18: Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for 18: Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and MultiFamily High-Rise Residential Buildings" RIN 1904-AC60 EA-1918: Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and MultiFamily High-Rise Residential Buildings" RIN 1904-AC60 SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of implementing provisions in the Energy Conservation and Production Act (ECPA) that require DOE to update the baseline Federal energy efficiency performance standards for the construction of new Federal buildings, including commercial and multi-family high-rise residential buildings. This EA addresses Federal commercial standard to the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-n Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 90.1-2010. The Final Rule was published

265

EA-1918: Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EA-1918: Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for EA-1918: Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and MultiFamily High-Rise Residential Buildings" RIN 1904-AC60 EA-1918: Final Rule, 10 CFR 433, "Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and MultiFamily High-Rise Residential Buildings" RIN 1904-AC60 SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of implementing provisions in the Energy Conservation and Production Act (ECPA) that require DOE to update the baseline Federal energy efficiency performance standards for the construction of new Federal buildings, including commercial and multi-family high-rise residential buildings. This EA addresses Federal commercial standard to the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-n Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 90.1-2010. The Final Rule was published

266

Sample collection, preservation and submittal procedures for 10 CFR 50 and 10 CFR 50 and 10 CFR 61 nuclear power plant matrices  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Sample collection, preservation and submittal procedures are described here for nuclear power plant 10 CFR 50 and 10 CFR 61 samples. While sample collection procedures should ensure that a sample reflects the true media type from a homogeneity standpoint, sample preservation is absolutely necessary to prevent the adsorption of analytes occurring on the walls of the container. After sample collection and preservation, the samples should be shipped to the radioanalytical laboratory as soon as possible to reduce the magnitude of analyte adsorption on the walls of the container. When samples are shipped for analysis, sample transmittal forms should be properly filled out to ensure that instructions are clear as to the isotopic analysis requested and the weight/volume of sample shipped, minimum detectable concentration (MDC) required, station code, etc.

Banavali, A.D.; Moreno, E.M.; McCurdy, D.E. [Yankee Atomic Environmental Lab., Boston, MA (United States)

1994-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

267

July 17, 2008; HSS/Union Working Group Meeting, Safety Standards, 10 CFR 851 - Agenda  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4-08 Draft 4-08 Draft HSS/Union Working Group Meeting July 17, 2008 1:00 - 4:00 pm EST FORS 7E-069 Call-in: 301-903-9197 SUBJECT: SAFETY STANDARDS / 10 CFR 851 Core Union Working Groups Safety Standards: Metal Trades Department AFL-CIO - Lead International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Association (OPCMIA) 10 CFR 851: United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union (USW) - Lead Building &Construction Trades Department Center for Construction Research &Training (BCTD CPWR) International Guards Union of America (IGUA) International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE)

268

10 CFR Part 1021 National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures - Preamble to Final Rule  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Regulations Regulations 15122 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Part 1021 National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) is revising the existing rule at 10 CFR part 1021, titled "Compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act," to incorporate revised provisions of DOE's Guidelines for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). DOE is also revoking its existing NEPA guidelines. This rule incorporates changes required by certain policy initiatives instituted by the Secretary of Energy to facilitate participation of the public and affected states in the NEPA process for proposed DOE actions.

269

10 CFR 850 Implementation of Requirements  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

10 CFR 850 defines a contractor as any entity, including affiliated entities, such as a parent corporation, under contract with DOE, including a subcontractor at any tier, with responsibility for performing work at a DOE site in furtherance of a DOE mission. The Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program (CBDPP) applies to beryllium-related activities that are performed at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). The CBDPP or Beryllium Safety Program is integrated into the LLNL Worker Safety and Health Program and, thus, implementation documents and responsibilities are integrated in various documents and organizational structures. Program development and management of the CBDPP is delegated to the Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Directorate, Worker Safety and Health Functional Area. As per 10 CFR 850, Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS) periodically submits a CBDPP to the National Nuclear Security Administration/Livermore Site Office (NNSA/LSO). The requirements of this plan are communicated to LLNS workers through ES&H Manual Document 14.4, 'Working Safely with Beryllium.' 10 CFR 850 is implemented by the LLNL CBDPP, which integrates the safety and health standards required by the regulation, components of the LLNL Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS), and incorporates other components of the LLNL ES&H Program. As described in the regulation, and to fully comply with the regulation, specific portions of existing programs and additional requirements are identified in the CBDPP. The CBDPP is implemented by documents that interface with the workers, principally through ES&H Manual Document 14.4. This document contains information on how the management practices prescribed by the LLNL ISMS are implemented, how beryllium hazards that are associated with LLNL work activities are controlled, and who is responsible for implementing the controls. Adherence to the requirements and processes described in the ES&H Manual ensures that ES&H practices across LLNL are developed in a consistent manner. Other implementing documents, such as the ES&H Manual, are integral in effectively implementing 10 CFR 850.

Lee, S

2012-01-05T23:59:59.000Z

270

10 CFR Part 1021 National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

21 21 Tuesday July 9, 1996 Part IV Department of Energy 10 CFR Part 1021 National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures; Final Rule 36222 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 9, 1996 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Part 1021 RIN 1901-AA67 National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) is amending its existing regulations governing compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The amendments incorporate changes that improve DOE's efficiency in implementing NEPA requirements by reducing costs and preparation time while maintaining quality, consistent with the DOE Secretarial Policy Statement on NEPA issued in June 1994.

271

Title 10 CFR Part 850, Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Wednesday Wednesday December 8, 1999 Part III Department of Energy 10 CFR Part 850 Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program; Final Rule VerDate 29-OCT-99 10:58 Dec 07, 1999 Jkt 190000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\A08DE0.189 pfrm04 PsN: 08DER3 68854 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 8, 1999 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Part 850 [Docket No. EH-RM-98-BRYLM] RIN 1901-AA75 Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program AGENCY: Office of Environment, Safety and Health, Department of Energy. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) is today publishing a final rule to establish a chronic beryllium disease prevention program (CBDPP) to reduce the number of workers currently exposed to beryllium in the course of their work at DOE facilities managed by

272

Review of the technical bases of 40 CFR Part 190.  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The dose limits for emissions from the nuclear fuel cycle were established by the Environmental Protection Agency in 40 CFR Part 190 in 1977. These limits were based on assumptions regarding the growth of nuclear power and the technical capabilities of decontamination systems as well as the then-current knowledge of atmospheric dispersion and the biological effects of ionizing radiation. In the more than thirty years since the adoption of the limits, much has changed with respect to the scale of nuclear energy deployment in the United States and the scientific knowledge associated with modeling health effects from radioactivity release. Sandia National Laboratories conducted a study to examine and understand the methodologies and technical bases of 40 CFR 190 and also to determine if the conclusions of the earlier work would be different today given the current projected growth of nuclear power and the advances in scientific understanding. This report documents the results of that work.

Kelly, John E.; McMahon, Kevin A.; Siegel, Malcolm Dean; Weiner, Ruth F.; Bixler, Nathan E.; Klein, Keith A. (Longenecker and Associates)

2010-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

273

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 98-01, Duration of Investigations Conducted Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.21; Purpose of Transcript Requirements Set Forth in 10 CFR 820.10(d)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, 1998 5, 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR: DOE PAAA COORDINATORS CONTRACTOR PAAA COORDINATORS FROM: SUBJECT: DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND INVESTIGATION Enforcement Guidance Supplement 98-01: Duration of Investigations Conducted Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.21; Purpose of Transcript Requirements Set Forth in 10 CFR 820.10 (d) The DOE Enforcement Handbook (1087-95) provides the Office of Enforcement and lnvestigation with the opportunity to issue interim clarifying guidance occasionally with respect to the processes to be used in this office (see Section 1.3- Interim Enforcement Guidance). In particular, it is important to assist contractors and others on the relationships between the requirements of Part 820 and the Enforcement Policy, 10 CFR 820, Appendix A. The main purpose of both the regulation and the Enforcement Policy is to assure

274

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 98-01: Duration of Investigations Conducted Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.21; Purpose of Transcript Requirements Set Forth in 10 CFR 820.10 (d)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, 1998 5, 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR: DOE PAAA COORDINATORS CONTRACTOR PAAA COORDINATORS FROM: R. KEITH CHRISTOPHER DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND INVESTIGATION SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 98-01: Duration of Investigations Conducted Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.21; Purpose of Transcript Requirements Set Forth in 10 CFR 820.10 (d) The DOE Enforcement Handbook (1087-95) provides the Office of Enforcement and Investigation with the opportunity to issue interim clarifying guidance occasionally with respect to the processes to be used in this office (see Section 1.3- Interim Enforcement Guidance). In particular, it is important to assist contractors and others on the relationships between the requirements of Part 820 and the Enforcement Policy, 10 CFR 820, Appendix A.

275

NSTP 2002-2 Methodology for Final Hazard Categorization for Nuclear  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NSTP 2002-2 Methodology for Final Hazard Categorization for Nuclear NSTP 2002-2 Methodology for Final Hazard Categorization for Nuclear Facilities from Category 3 to Radiological (11/13/02). NSTP 2002-2 Methodology for Final Hazard Categorization for Nuclear Facilities from Category 3 to Radiological (11/13/02). 0 CFR 830 Subpart B requires that all DOE nuclear facilities categorized as HC-3 or above have a DOE approved safety basis compliant with the requirements of Subpart B. The rule requires the use of DOESTD- 1027-92 (STD- 1027) as the methodology for categorizing DOE nuclear facilities. STD- 1027 requires a preliminary categorization be established on the basis of the inventory of radionuclides in a facility or involved in an activity. It also permits a safety analyses (see STD-1027 section 3.1.2) to establish a final

276

Methodology for Final Hazard Categorization for Nuclear Facilities from Category 3 to Radiological  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Nuclear and Facility Safety Policy Office of Nuclear and Facility Safety Policy Nuclear Safety Technical Position NSTP 2002-2 Methodology for Final Hazard Categorization for Nuclear Facilities from Category 3 to Radiological Issue: DOE-STD-1027-92 defines a lower threshold criterion for preliminary hazard categorization as a nuclear Hazard Category 3 (HC-3) facility or activity. But it does not provide a method other than inventory reduction or segmentation on how an HC-3 facility or activity can be demonstrated to be below HC-3 (i.e., radiological) in final hazard categorization. Background: 10 CFR 830 Subpart B requires that all DOE nuclear facilities categorized as HC-3 or above have a DOE approved safety basis compliant with the requirements of Subpart B. The rule requires the use of DOE-

277

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Nuclear Security AdministrationlKansas City Site Office A. Description of Proposed Action: (lor 2 sentences; include title, general activities, location, timeframe) Kansas City Plant - Project 1616 - Remove Inactive High Voltage PCB line behind Barn area: Removal of an abandoned high voltage cable, the removal of an abandoned wooden cable tray, and a general clean-up of the area. March 2014 thru June 2014. B. Number and Title of the Categorical Exclusion Being Applied: (See text in 10 CPR 1021, Subpart D.) B 1.11 - Removal of polychlorinated biphenyl-containing items from buildings, other above ground locations. C. Regulatory Requirements in 10 CFR 1021.410 (b): (See full text in regulation.) (1) The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or B to Subpart D.

278

Document  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

66 66 29 CFR Ch. XIV (7-1-04 Edition) § 1614.101 1614.402 Time for appeals to the Commis- sion. 1614.403 How to appeal. 1614.404 Appellate procedure. 1614.405 Decisions on appeals. 1614.406 Time limits. [Reserved] 1614.407 Civil action: Title VII, Age Dis- crimination in Employment Act and Re- habilitation Act. 1614.408 Civil action: Equal Pay Act. 1614.409 Effect of filing a civil action. Subpart E-Remedies and Enforcement 1614.501 Remedies and relief. 1614.502 Compliance with final Commission decisions. 1614.503 Enforcement of final Commission decisions. 1614.504 Compliance with settlement agree- ments and final action. 1614.505 Interim relief. Subpart F-Matters of General Applicability 1614.601 EEO group statistics. 1614.602 Reports to the Commission. 1614.603

279

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

61 - 28470 of 31,917 results. 61 - 28470 of 31,917 results. Download NSTP 2002-2 Methodology for Final Hazard Categorization for Nuclear Facilities from Category 3 to Radiological (11/13/02). 0 CFR 830 Subpart B requires that all DOE nuclear facilities categorized as HC-3 or above have a DOEapproved safety basis compliant with the requirements of Subpart B. The rule requires the use of... http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/nstp-2002-2-methodology-final-hazard-categorization-nuclear Download Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Operations Office- December 2010 Specific Administrative Controls Review with the Office of Environmental Management at DOE-Richland Operations Office http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/independent-specific-administrative-controls-review-richland-operations-office

280

Microsoft Word - psh-13-0085.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 11, 2013 ) Case No.: PSH-13-0085 July 11, 2013 ) Case No.: PSH-13-0085 ) __________________________________________) Issued : September 30, 2013 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ Janet R. H. Fishman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the Individual") to hold an access authorization 1/ under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations and Adjudicative Guidelines, I have determined

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "helium-48 cfr subpart" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Microsoft Word - CX-TroutdaleWindowReplacement_WEB.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

, 2011 , 2011 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEPR-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Eric Weekley Project Manager - NWM-4 Proposed Action: Replace existing steel windows at the Troutdale Substation control house PP&A Project No.: PP&A-1699 Budget Information: Work Order No. 242796 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B1.3 Routine maintenance activities and custodial services for buildings, structures, ... Location: Bonneville Power Administration's (BPA) Troutdale Substation located in Troutdale, Oregon Proposed by: BPA Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to replace the deteriorating existing steel windows at the Troutdale Substation control house with new, in-kind steel windows.

282

Microsoft Word - PSH-13-0012.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 5, 2013 ) February 5, 2013 ) ) Case No.: PSH-13-0012 __________________________________________) Issued: July 17, 2013 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ Wade M. Boswell, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXXX. (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations and Adjudicative Guidelines, I have determined

283

Microsoft Word - PSH-12-0068.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 31, 2012 ) May 31, 2012 ) ) Case No.: PSH-12-0068 ) __________________________________________) Issued: September 24, 2012 _______________ Hearing Officer Decision _______________ Steven L. Fine, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the Individual") to hold a security clearance under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations, I conclude that the Individual's security clearance should not be restored.

284

Microsoft Word - PSH-13-0037.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: March 21, 2013 ) ) Case No.: PSH-13-0037 __________________________________________) Issued: July 25, 2013 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ Wade M. Boswell, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear

285

Date Stamped/Typed Centered  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-C 2-C NEPA ID No.: PXP-10-0004 Deactivation & Decommissioning of the North Compost Tent Application of DOE NEPA Procedure: Categorical Exclusion B1.23, Applicable to Facility Operations (10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B), applies to the proposed activity. Rationale: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), proposes to demolish Environmental Restoration's (ER) North Compost Tent, which was damaged by a storm in 2003 and has not been fully operational since then. It is considered unsalvageable by the Facility & Systems Design Department. Demolition will consist of: Removal of clay soil (approximately 1 foot deep) and two liners (polyvinylchloride and

286

Microsoft Word - CX-DrainageUpgradesMultipleSubsFY13_WEB.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

, 2012 , 2012 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Brett Sherer Project Manager - KEP-4 Proposed Action: FY13 Environmental Drainage Upgrades at Bonneville Power Administration's (BPA) Clatsop, Garrison, Lexington, Mapleton, Ovando, Pearl, and Wren substations Budget Information: Work Order #: 00004952 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B4.6 Additions or modifications to electric power transmission facilities Location: Substation County, State Township, Range, Section Clatsop Clatsop County, Oregon Township 8 North, Range 9 West, Section 30 Garrison Powell County, Montana Township 9 North, Range 10 West, Section 20 Lexington Cowlitz County, Washington Township 8 North, Range 2 West, Section 15

287

Microsoft Word - psh-13-0098  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

15, 2013 ) Case No.: PSH-13-0098 15, 2013 ) Case No.: PSH-13-0098 ) __________________________________________) Issued : December 12, 2013 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ Janet R. H. Fishman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the Individual") to hold an access authorization 1/ under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations and Adjudicative Guidelines, I have determined

288

Microsoft Word - PSH-12-0113.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 28, 2012 ) August 28, 2012 ) ) Case No.: PSH-12-0113 ) __________________________________________) Issued: December 18, 2012 _______________ Hearing Officer Decision _______________ Steven L. Fine, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the Individual") to hold a security clearance under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations, I conclude that the Individual's security clearance should not be granted.

289

Microsoft Word - psh-13-0001.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: January 7, 2013 ) Case No.: PSH-13-0001 ) __________________________________________) Issued : May 1, 2013 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ Janet R. H. Fishman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the Individual") to hold an access authorization 1/ under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before

290

Microsoft Word - PSH-11-0002.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 18, 2011 ) October 18, 2011 ) ) Case No.: PSH-11-0002 ) __________________________________________) Issued: February 14, 2012 _______________ Hearing Officer Decision _______________ Steven L. Fine, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXX XXXX XXX(hereinafter referred to as "the Individual") to hold a security clearance under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations, I conclude that the Individual's security clearance should not be restored.

291

Microsoft Word - SNOPUD_Youngs_Cr_Hydro_CX_+_Checklist.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

18, 2010 18, 2010 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum James Hall Customer Service Engineer - TPC-TPP-4 Proposed Action: Interconnection of Snohomish County Public Utility District No.1 (SNOPUD) Young's Creek Hydro Small Generation Budget Information: WO# 00231295, Task 01 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B4.6 Additions or modifications to electric power transmission facilities that would not affect the environment beyond the previously developed facility area including, but not limited to, switchyard rock grounding upgrades, secondary containment projects, paving projects, seismic upgrading, tower modifications, changing insulators, and replacement of poles, circuit breakers, conductors,

292

Microsoft Word - CX - Woodland 148.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Timothy Murray Timothy Murray Project Manager - TELP-TPP-3 Proposed Action: Woodland & 148 th Clearwire Wireless Communication Facilities Budget Information: Work Order #00241948, Task 01 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B1.7 Acquisition, installation, operation, and removal of communication systems... B1.19 Siting, construction, and operation of microwave and radio communication towers and associated facilities... Location: Towenship 19 North, Range 4 East, Section 20 in Pierce County, Washington Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Description of the Proposed Action: Clearwire Communications has requested to attach wireless communication facilities atop tower 50/2 of BPA's Chehalis-Covington #1

293

Microsoft Word - Obsidian Finance Group Integration.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

James Hall - TPC-TPP-4 James Hall - TPC-TPP-4 Project Manager Proposed Action: Obsidian Finance Group, LLC Generation Interconnection Requests Budget Information: Sage Solar Work Order # 231305, Task 01 Outback Renewables Work Order # 231307, Task 01 Lost Forest Solar Work Order # 231312, Task 01 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B1.7 "Acquisition, installation, operation, and removal of communication systems, data processing equipment, and similar electronic equipment." B4.6: "Additions or modifications to electric power transmission facilities that would not affect the environment beyond the previously developed facility area..." Location: Lake County, Oregon Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA)

294

Microsoft Word - psh-13-0094.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Personnel Security Hearing ) of Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: July 29, 2013 ) Case No.: PSH-13-0094 ) _________________________________________ ) Issued: November 5, 2013 ___________________ Hearing Officer Decision ____________________ Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of xxxxxxxxxxxx (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant

295

P:\DECISION\1009.tso.wpd  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 9, 2011 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Hearing Officer's Decision Name of Case: Personnel Security Hearing Date of Filing: February 15, 2011 Case Number: TSO-1009 This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1/ under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations, I have determined that the individual's access authorization should not be restored.

296

Microsoft Word - psh-13-0008.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: January 24, 2013 ) Case No.: PSH-13-0008 ) _________________________________________ ) Issued: June 6, 2013 ___________________ Hearing Officer Decision ____________________ Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant

297

Microsoft Word - PSH-13-0025.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 5, 2013 ) March 5, 2013 ) ) Case No.: PSH-13-0025 __________________________________________) Issued : July 11, 2013 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ Wade M. Boswell, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations and Adjudicative Guidelines, I have

298

U.S. Department of Energy NEPA Categorical Exclusion Determination Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CA-City-Petaluma CA-City-Petaluma Location: City Petaluma CA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Proposed Action or Project Description 1) Installation of energy efficiency retrofits in five municipal buildings, and 2) development and implementation of a Regional Building Energy Retrofit Program including development of a retrofit plan, implementation of an "area-wide building energy retrofit pilot project, and development and implementation of an outreach program Conditions: None Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied: A1, A9, B2.5, B5.1 *-For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, see Subpart D of 10 CFR10 21

299

psh-12-0039  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April 18, 2012 ) April 18, 2012 ) ) Case No.: PSH-12-0039 __________________________________________) Issued : August 24, 2012 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ Ann S. Augustyn, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as " the individual ") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material. " As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations and the Adjudicative Guidelines, I have determined that the DOE

300

The original of this document contains information which is subject to withholdi  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 19, 2012 ) Case No.: PSH-12-0142 December 19, 2012 ) Case No.: PSH-12-0142 ) _________________________________________ ) Issued: March 22, 2013 ___________________ Hearing Officer Decision ____________________ Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations and Adjudicative Guidelines, I have determined that the individual's access

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "helium-48 cfr subpart" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Microsoft Word - CX-Snohomish-MurrayWoodPoles_WEB.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEPR-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Joyce Vaughn Project Manager - TELP-TPP-3 Proposed Action: Snohomish-Murray No.1 structure 9/4 modification PP&A Project No.: 1990 Budget Information: Work Order 00251084, Task 03 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B4.6: Additions or modifications to electric power transmission facilities that would not affect the environment beyond the previously developed facility area including, but not limited to, switchyard rock grounding upgrades, secondary containment projects, paving projects, seismic upgrading, tower modifications, changing insulators, replacement of poles, circuit breakers, conductors, transformers, and crossarms.

302

Microsoft Word - PSH-13-0036.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 21, 2013 ) March 21, 2013 ) ) Case No.: PSH-13-0036 __________________________________________) Issued : June 27, 2013 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ Wade M. Boswell, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations and Adjudicative Guidelines, I have

303

Microsoft Word - PSH-12-0134  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 26, 2012 ) November 26, 2012 ) ) Case No.: PSH-12-0134 __________________________________________) Issued : April 2, 2013 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ William M. Schwartz, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations and Adjudicative Guidelines, I have determined

304

Microsoft Word - CX for Spring Basin Wilderness Land Exhange with BLM.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DATE: June 5, 2012 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Jason Karnezis Project Manager - KEWL-4 Proposed Action: Spring Basin Wilderness Land Exchange Fish and Wildlife Project No.: 1998-022-00 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B1.25 Real Property transfers for cultural resources protection, habitat preservation and wildlife management Location: Fossil, Wheeler County, OR (see attached Exhibits A and B for legal land descriptions) Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Description of the Proposed Action: In June 2008 Oregon Senator Wyden introduced legislation to Congress to designate the "Oregon Spring Basin Wilderness (Spring Basin)." In 2008, Spring

305

Microsoft Word - PSH-13-0003.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 14, 2013 ) January 14, 2013 ) ) Case No.: PSH-13-0003 __________________________________________) Issued: May 1, 2013 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ William M. Schwartz, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations and the Adjudicative Guidelines, I have determined

306

Microsoft Word - PSH-13-0041.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April 5, 2013 ) April 5, 2013 ) ) Case No.: PSH-13-0041 ) __________________________________________) Issued: June 26, 2013 _______________ Hearing Officer Decision _______________ Steven L. Fine, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the Individual") to hold a security clearance 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations, I conclude that the Individual's security clearance should not be restored.

307

Microsoft Word - CX_YNSturgeonMgmt_2012.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

United States Government Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration DATE: December 27, 2012 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Dave Roberts Project Manager - KEW Proposed Action: Continuation of Yakama Nation Sturgeon Management Project Fish and Wildlife Project No.: 2008-455-00 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B1.20 Small-scale activities undertaken to protect cultural resources (such as fencing, labeling, and flagging) or to protect, restore, or improve fish and wildlife habitat, fish passage facilities (such as fish ladders and minor diversion channels), or fisheries. Location: Prosser and Marion Drain, Benton and Yakima counties, Washington

308

Microsoft Word - Roosevelt-HW-Hill_Landfill-G0335-I0019-CX.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 2009 1, 2009 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum James Hall Customer Service Engineer - TPC-TPP-4 Proposed Action: H.W. Hill / Roosevelt Landfill Gas Generation Expansion Project (#I0019 and #G0335) Budget Information: Work Order # 244620, Task # 03 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B1.7: "Acquisition, installation, operation, and removal of communication systems..." B4.6: "Additions or modifications to electric power transmission facilities that would not affect the environment beyond the previously developed facility area..." Location: Klickitat County, Washington Proposed by: Klickitat County Public Utility District No.1 (KPUD) and Bonneville Power

309

Microsoft Word - PSH-12-0121.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 4, 2012 ) October 4, 2012 ) ) Case No.: PSH-12-0121 __________________________________________) Issued : January 23, 2013 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ Wade M. Boswell, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations and Adjudicative Guidelines, I have determined that the

310

Microsoft Word - PSH-12-0092.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 19, 2012 ) July 19, 2012 ) ) Case No.: PSH-12-0092 ) __________________________________________) Issued: November 13, 2012 _______________ Hearing Officer Decision _______________ Steven L. Fine, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the Individual") to hold a security clearance under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations, I conclude that the Individual's security clearance should not be granted.

311

Microsoft Word - psh-13-0039.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April 1, 2013 ) Case No.: PSH-13-0039 April 1, 2013 ) Case No.: PSH-13-0039 ) __________________________________________) Issued : July 3, 2013 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ Janet R. H. Fishman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the Individual") to hold an access authorization 1/ under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations and Adjudicative Guidelines, I have determined

312

Microsoft Word - PSH-12-0107.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 10, 2012 ) August 10, 2012 ) ) Case No.: PSH-12-0107 __________________________________________) Issued : November 26, 2012 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ William M. Schwartz, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations and Adjudicative Guidelines, I have determined

313

EA-0437: Final Environmental Assessment | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

437: Final Environmental Assessment 437: Final Environmental Assessment EA-0437: Final Environmental Assessment Process Equipment Waste and Process Waste Liquid Collection Systems Idaho Chemical Processing Plant, Idaho National Engineering Laboratory This Environmental Assessment describes and evaluates the environmental impacts of Idaho National Engineering Laboratory's proposed action (and alternatives to the proposed action). The proposed action, which would be to install new waste lines and associated equipment in the Process Equipment Waste and Process Waste Liquid systems, seeks to bring those existing parts of a waste management facility into compliance with applicable state and federal environmental regulatory requirements (49 CFR 265 Subpart J and Idaho Administrative Procedures Act Title I, Chapter 5,

314

RL-721 Document ID Number: REV4 NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ID Number: ID Number: REV4 NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM DOE/CX-00125, Rev 0 I. Project Title: MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Actions to Conserve Energy or Water under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B5.1 II. Project Description and location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions - e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform actions to conserve energy or

315

P:\DECISION\psh-12-0073.wpd  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 21, 2012 ) June 21, 2012 ) Case No. PSH-12-0073 ) ) ____________________________________) Issued: November 8, 2012 __________ Hearing Officer Decision __________ Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1/ under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations, I have determined that the individual's access authorization should be restored.

316

Microsoft Word - Energetics Solar CX.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

, 2011 , 2011 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Deborah Ruckwardt - TEP-CSB-1 Proposed Action: Integration of G0387 Energetics Solar Integration project into BPA's balancing Authority Budget Information: Work Order # 246335, Task 01 Categorical Exclusions Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B1.7 "Acquisition, installation, operation, and removal of communication systems, data processing equipment, and similar electronic equipment." B4.6: "Additions or modifications to electric power transmission facilities that would not affect the environment beyond the previously developed facility area..." Location: Lake County, Oregon Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA)

317

Microsoft Word - psh-13-0069.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Personnel Security Hearing ) of Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: May 30, 2013 ) Case No.: PSH-13-0069 ) _________________________________________ ) Issued: October 11, 2013 ___________________ Hearing Officer Decision ____________________ Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant

318

Microsoft Word - 1109.TSO.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 9, 2011 ) September 9, 2011 ) ) Case No.: TSO-01109 ) __________________________________________) Issued: November 10, 2011 _______________ Hearing Officer Decision _______________ Steven L. Fine, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXX X. XXXXXX(hereinafter referred to as "the Individual") to obtain a security clearance under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations, I have determined that the DOE should not grant a security clearance to the

319

Microsoft Word - PSH-12-0103.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 3, 2012 ) August 3, 2012 ) ) Case No.: PSH-12-0103 __________________________________________) Issued : November 5, 2012 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ Wade M. Boswell, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations and Adjudicative Guidelines, I have determined

320

Microsoft Word - psh-12-0120.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Personnel Security Hearing ) of Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: October 4, 2012 ) Case No.: PSH-12-0120 ) _________________________________________ ) Issued: February 4, 2013 ___________________ Hearing Officer Decision ____________________ Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "helium-48 cfr subpart" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Microsoft Word - PSH-13-0093  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: July 23, 2013 ) ) Case No.: PSH-13-0093 __________________________________________) Issued: November 8, 2013 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ William M. Schwartz, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me

322

Microsoft Word - PSH-12-0093.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 24, 2012 ) July 24, 2012 ) ) Case No.: PSH-12-0093 __________________________________________) Issued : November 15, 2012 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ Wade M. Boswell, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations and Adjudicative Guidelines, I have determined

323

Microsoft Word - psh-11-0026.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: November 28, 2011 ) ) Case No.: PSH-11-0026 __________________________________________) Issued : March 27, 2012 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ Valerie Vance Adeyeye, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special

324

Microsoft Word - PSH-13-0070.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 30, 2013 ) May 30, 2013 ) ) Case No.: PSH-13-0070 __________________________________________) Issued : October 10, 2013 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ Wade M. Boswell, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXX ((hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations and Adjudicative Guidelines, I have determined

325

Microsoft Word - Kennewick Site-PacifiCorp_CX.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 22, 2010 June 22, 2010 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Cynthia Rounds - TPC-TPP-4 Project Manager Proposed Action: The replacement of PacifiCorp's Kennewick - Dayton Hilltop microwave communication equipment. Budget Information: N/A Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B1.7 "Acquisition, installation, operation, and removal of communication systems, data processing equipment, and similar electronic equipment." B4.6: "Additions or modifications to electric power transmission facilities that would not affect the environment beyond the previously developed facility area..." Location: Benton County, Washington Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA)

326

Microsoft Word - psh-13-0071.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 5, 2013 ) Case No.: PSH-13-0071 June 5, 2013 ) Case No.: PSH-13-0071 ) _________________________________________ ) Issued: October 10, 2013 ___________________ Hearing Officer Decision ____________________ Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations and Adjudicative Guidelines, I have determined that the individual's access

327

Microsoft Word - PSH-13-0016.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

11, 2013 ) 11, 2013 ) ) Case No.: PSH-13-0016 __________________________________________) Issued : June 20, 2013 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ Wade M. Boswell, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations and Adjudicative Guidelines, I have determined

328

Microsoft Word - PSH-12-0118.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 19, 2012 ) September 19, 2012 ) ) Case No.: PSH-12-0118 __________________________________________) Issued : January 17, 2013 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ Wade M. Boswell, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations and Adjudicative Guidelines, I have determined that the

329

EHS 381  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

EHS0384 Electrical Equipment Safety Program Annual update for Surveyors EHS0384 Electrical Equipment Safety Program Annual update for Surveyors Course Syllabus Subject Category: General Course Prerequisite: None Course Length: 1 page information update to read Medical Approval: None Delivery Mode: online Frequency: Annual Course Purpose: This is to provide annual updates on changes that have occurred to the Electrical Equipment Safety Program. It is intended for electrical equipment surveyors. Course Objectives: * To understand changes to the Electrical Equipment Safety Program Subject Matter Expert: Mark Scott Training Compliance Requirements: 29 CFR 1910 Subpart S, NEC, Chapter 8 Web-based Exam: No Final Exam: No Course Instructional Materials: Online document

330

Microsoft Word - PSH-12-0143  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 19, 2012 ) December 19, 2012 ) ) Case No.: PSH-12-0143 __________________________________________) Issued: April 17, 2013 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ William M. Schwartz, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations and the Adjudicative Guidelines, I have determined

331

Microsoft Word - psh-13-0020.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 19, 2013 ) Case No.: PSH-13-0020 February 19, 2013 ) Case No.: PSH-13-0020 ) _________________________________________ ) Issued: May 31, 2013 ___________________ Hearing Officer Decision ____________________ Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of xxxxxxxxxxxxx (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations and Adjudicative Guidelines, I have determined that the individual's access

332

Microsoft Word - PSH-12-0135  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552. Such material has been deleted from this copy and replaced with XXXXXX's. United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: November 26, 2012 ) ) Case No.: PSH-12-0135 __________________________________________) Issued : February 12, 2013 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ Wade M. Boswell, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria

333

Microsoft Word - psh-13-0038.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 21, 2013 ) Case No.: PSH-13-0038 March 21, 2013 ) Case No.: PSH-13-0038 ) __________________________________________) Issued: June 26, 2013 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ Janet R. H. Fishman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the Individual") to hold an access authorization 1/ under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations and Adjudicative Guidelines, I have determined

334

Microsoft Word - PSH-12-0075.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 25, 2012 ) June 25, 2012 ) ) Case No.: PSH-12-0075 __________________________________________) Issued : October 25, 2012 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ Wade M. Boswell, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations and Adjudicative Guidelines, I have determined

335

Microsoft Word - PSH-13-0033.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: March 14, 2013 ) ) Case No.: PSH-13-0033 __________________________________________) Issued : July 31, 2013 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ Wade M. Boswell, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before

336

Microsoft Word - PSH-13-0018.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

12, 2013 ) 12, 2013 ) ) Case No.: PSH-13-0018 ) __________________________________________) Issued: May 23, 2013 _______________ Hearing Officer Decision _______________ Steven L. Fine, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXX X. XXX (hereinafter referred to as "the Individual") to hold a security clearance under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations, I conclude that the Individual's security clearance should not be granted.

337

Microsoft Word - CX-HatwaiSubstationUpgradesFY11_WEB.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

18, 2011 18, 2011 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Brett Sherer Project Manager - KEP-4 Proposed Action: Upgrade of secondary containment facilities at Hatwai Substation Budget Information: Work Order: 00004952 Categorical Exclusion Applied (Appendix B to Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B4.6: Additions or modifications to electric power transmission facilities that would not affect the environment beyond the previously developed facility area including, but not limited to: switchyard rock grounding upgrades, secondary containment projects, paving projects, seismic upgrading, tower modifications, changing insulators, and replacement of poles, circuit breakers, conductors, transformers, and crossarms.

338

Microsoft Word - PSH-12-0129  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 9, 2012 ) November 9, 2012 ) ) Case No.: PSH-12-0129 ) __________________________________________) Issued: February 14, 2013 _______________ Hearing Officer Decision _______________ Steven L. Fine, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXX X. XXX (hereinafter referred to as "the Individual") to hold a security clearance under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations, I conclude that the Individual's security clearance should not be restored.

339

Microsoft Word - Wireless - Nike CX.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6, 2010 6, 2010 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Tim Murray Project Manager - TELP-TPP-3 Proposed Action: Nike Clearwire Wireless Communication Facilities Budget Information: WO# 227499, Task 01 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B1.7 Acquisition, installation, operation, and removal of communication systems... B1.15 Siting, construction (or modification), and operation of support buildings or support structures... B1.19 Siting, construction, and operation of microwave and radio communication towers and associated facilities... Location: Washington County, Oregon, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Section 5 Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA)

340

Microsoft Word - Omak-Area-3G-CX.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2011 9, 2011 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Roger Thomas Project Manager - TECT-CSB-1 Proposed Action: Omak Area 3G Radio Site Upgrades Budget Information: Work Orders 197229, 197230, & 197231; Task 03 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B1.19 "Siting, construction, and operation of microwave and radio communication towers and associated facilities..." Location: Okanogan and Douglas counties, Washington Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to upgrade communication equipment at three existing BPA facilities in Okanogan and Douglas counties, Washington. The work would occur at two

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "helium-48 cfr subpart" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Microsoft Word - PSH-13-0043.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

C. § 552. Such material has been deleted from this copy and C. § 552. Such material has been deleted from this copy and replaced with XXXXXX's. United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: April 8, 2013 ) ) Case No.: PSH-13-0043 __________________________________________) Issued: July 9, 2013 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ William M. Schwartz, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria

342

Microsoft Word - psh-13-0004.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10, 2013 ) Case No.: PSH-13-0004 10, 2013 ) Case No.: PSH-13-0004 ) _________________________________________ ) Issued: July 1, 2013 ___________________ Hearing Officer Decision ____________________ Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of xxxxxxxxxxxxx (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations and Adjudicative Guidelines, I have determined that the individual's access

343

Microsoft Word - Badger Canyon CXWEB.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

KEC-4 KEC-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum David Tripp Project Manager - TEP-CSB-1 Proposed Action: Badger Canyon Substation Radio Communication Tower Project Budget Information: Work Order 00253262 Task 03 Categorical Exclusions Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021: B1.7 "Acquisition, installation, operation, and removal of communication systems..." B1.19 "Siting, construction, and operation of microwave and radio communication towers and associated facilities..." Location: Badger Canyon Substation, Benton County, Washington - Township 8 North, Range 28 East, Section 1 Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to replace a 40-foot monopole communication

344

Microsoft Word - PSH-11-0015.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Hearings and Appeals In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: November 4, 2011 ) ) Case No.: PSH-11-0015 __________________________________________) Issued : February 9, 2012 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ William M. Schwartz, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before

345

U.S. Department of Energy NEPA Categorical Exclusion Determination Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MS-City-Gulfport MS-City-Gulfport Location: City Gulfport MS American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Proposed Action or Project Description: Upgrading electrical and mechanical infrastructure in city facilities, including: building automation and control systems; lighting upgrades; HVAC upgrades; community awareness and public education; and measure & verification program Conditions: Historic preservation clause applies to this application Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied: A1, B2.5, B5.1 *-For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, see Subpart D of 10 CFR10 21 This action would not: threaten a violation of applicable statutory, regulatory, or permit requirements for environment, safety, and health,

346

Microsoft Word - CX-CircuitBreakerReplacementsMultipleSubstationsFY12_WEB.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

12, 2012 12, 2012 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEPR-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Michael Gilchrist Project Manager - TEP-TPP-1 Proposed Action: Power Circuit Breaker Replacement Project Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): Appendix B4.6, Additions and modifications to transmission facilities. Location: Tumwater, Thurston County, WA; Ravensdale, King County, WA; Silver Creek, Lewis County, WA; Shelton, Mason County, WA; Bremerton, Kitsap County, WA; Bandon, Coos County, OR; Toledo, Lincoln County, OR; Wilsonville, Washington County, OR; Gold Beach, Curry County, OR; Stayton, Marion County, OR; Swan Valley, Bonneville County, ID; Moose, Teton County, WY (ID); Gold Creek, Powell County, MT.

347

Microsoft Word - PSH-12-0058.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: May 16, 2012 ) ) Case No.: PSH-12-0058 __________________________________________) Issued : August 9, 2012 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ William M. Schwartz, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before

348

Microsoft Word - psh-13-0040.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, 2013 ) Case No.: PSH-13-0040 2, 2013 ) Case No.: PSH-13-0040 ) _________________________________________ ) Issued: July 25, 2013 ___________________ Hearing Officer Decision ____________________ Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations and Adjudicative Guidelines, I have determined that the individual's access

349

 

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fire Protection Upgrade Major Construction Project (MCP) Fire Protection Upgrade Major Construction Project (MCP) REFERENCE 10 CFR Part 1021, Department of Energy National Environmental Policy Act Implementation Procedures, Subpart D, Typical Classes of Actions PROJECT SCOPE DISCUSSION The goal and objective of the NRF Fire Protection Upgrade MCP is to upgrade the existing fire alarm system at NRF by replacing obsolescent equipment, resolving known code deficiencies, and eliminating system vulnerabilities using "good value" engineered solutions. "Good value" engineered solutions are those that: a) minimize cost of system installation, b) minimize cost of system operation and surveillance, c) maximize service life, d) maximize spare parts and

350

Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

KS-City-Manhattan KS-City-Manhattan Location: City Manhattan KS American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Proposed Action or Project Description 1) Replace traffic signal bulbs, 2) Relamp pedestrian fixtures, 3) replace school zone flashing assemblies, and 4) participation in the Take-Charge Energy Challenge Program (printing flyers, brochures, etc.; educational outreach; postage; promotional activities; etc.). Conditions: None--Programmatic Agreement covers activities Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied: B5.1 *-For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, see Subpart D of 10 CFR10 21 This action would not: threaten a violation of applicable statutory, regulatory, or permit requirements for environment, safety, and health,

351

Microsoft Word - psh-12-0015.wpd  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the Matter of Personnel Security ) Filing Date: February 28, 2012 ) ) Case No. PSH-12-0015 ) ____________________________________) Issued: June 28, 2012 __________ Decision and Order __________ Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of xxxxxxxxxxxx hereinafter referred to as Athe individual@) to hold an access authorization 1 / under the Department of Energy=s (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, AGeneral Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material.@ As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant

352

P:\DECISION\psh-12-0059.wpd  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Security Security ) Filing Date: May 16, 2012 ) ) Case No. PSH-12-0059 ) ____________________________________) Issued: September 13, 2012 __________ Hearing Officer Decision __________ Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1/ under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations, I have determined that the individual's access authorization should not be granted.

353

Microsoft Word - psh-13-0091.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: July 17, 2013 ) Case No.: PSH-13-0091 ) __________________________________________) Issued : October 10, 2013 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ Janet R. H. Fishman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the Individual") to hold an access authorization 1/ under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant

354

Microsoft Word - PSH-13-0102  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

29, 2013 ) 29, 2013 ) ) Case No.: PSH-13-0102 __________________________________________) Issued: December 20, 2013 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ William M. Schwartz, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations and the Adjudicative Guidelines, I have determined

355

Microsoft Word - PSH-12-0126.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 1, 2012 ) November 1, 2012 ) ) Case No.: PSH-12-0126 __________________________________________) Issued : February 1, 2013 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ Wade M. Boswell, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations and Adjudicative Guidelines, I have determined that the

356

Microsoft Word - psh-12-0122  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: October 15, 2012 ) Case No.: PSH-12-0122 ) _________________________________________ ) Issued: February 15, 2013 ___________________ Hearing Officer Decision ____________________ Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of xxxxxxxxxxxxx (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant

357

Microsoft Word - psh-13-0076.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

replaced with XXXXXX's. United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: June 14, 2013 ) ) Case No.: PSH-13-0076 _________________________________________ ) Issued: August 27, 2013 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ Ann S. Augustyn, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special

358

CX-009665: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5: Categorical Exclusion Determination 5: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-009665: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Air Conditioning Systems for Existing Equipment under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart o, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B1.4 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform installation or modification of air conditioning systems required for temperature control for operations of existing buildings, structures, infrastructures, and equipment in previously disturbed or developed areas. CX-009665.pdf More Documents & Publications CX-009099: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-006627: Categorical Exclusion Determination

359

Microsoft Word - psh-12-0133  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Matter of Personnel Security Hearing ) Matter of Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: November 21, 2012 ) Case No.: PSH-12-0133 ) _________________________________________ ) Issued: March 5, 2013 ___________________ Hearing Officer Decision ____________________ Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of xxxxxxxxxxxx (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant

360

Microsoft Word - 2010_NESC_Power_Purchase_Contract_CX.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0, 2010 0, 2010 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum John Wellschlager Project Manager - PTL-5 Proposed Action: Output Power Purchase Agreement with Northwest Energy Supply Cooperative - Barr-Tech, LLC Resource Budget Information: #00003863; Task #01 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B4.1 Establishment and implementation of contracts, marketing plans, policies, allocation plans, or acquisition of excess electric power that does not involve: (1) the integration of new generation resource, (2) physical changes in the transmission system beyond the previously developed facility area, unless the changes are themselves categorically excluded, or (3) changes in the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "helium-48 cfr subpart" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Microsoft Word - CX-Covington_Substation_WEB.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8, 2010 8, 2010 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEPR-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Kerry Cook Project Manager - TELF-TPP-3 Proposed Action: Perform research of groundwater drainage and flooding issues at Covington Complex through the installation of four groundwater monitoring wells PP&A Project No.: PP&A-1772 Budget Information: Work Order #00246440 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B3.6 Siting/ construction/operation/decommissioning of facilities for bench-scale research, conventional laboratory operations, small-scale research and development and pilot projects. Location: Covington Substation in King County, Washington Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA)

362

P:\DECISION\psh-12-0038.wpd  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April 17, 2012 April 17, 2012 ) ) Case No. PSH-12-0038 ) ____________________________________) Issued: August 9, 2012 __________ Hearing Officer Decision __________ Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1/ under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations, I have determined that the individual's access authorization should be restored. I. Background

363

Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MS-County-Jones MS-County-Jones Location: County Jones MS American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Proposed Action or Project Description: Energy efficiency retrofits in Laurel and Ellisville Courthouses: elevator replacement, electrical switchgear replacement, HVAC replacements, storm window replacements, and vestibule installation at main entrances. Conditions: Historic preservation clause applies to this application (both properties are on National Register) Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.1 *-For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, see Subpart D of 10 CFR10 21 This action would not: threaten a violation of applicable statutory, regulatory, or permit requirements for environment, safety, and health,

364

Microsoft Word - PSH-13-0019.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: February 19, 2013 ) ) Case No.: PSH-13-0019 __________________________________________) Issued : June 11, 2013 ______________________ Hearing Officer Decision ______________________ Wade M. Boswell, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special

365

Microsoft Word - psh-13-0044.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8, 2013 ) Case No.: PSH-13-0044 8, 2013 ) Case No.: PSH-13-0044 ) _________________________________________ ) Issued: July 26, 2013 ___________________ Hearing Officer Decision ____________________ Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1 under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As fully discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations and Adjudicative Guidelines, I have determined that the individual's access

366

Basis to demonstrate compliance with the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the Stand-off Experiments Range  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this report is to provide the basis and the documentation to demonstrate general compliance with the National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS) 40 CFR 61 Subpart H, National Emission Standards for Emissions of Radionuclides Other Than Radon from Department of Energy Facilities, (the Standard) for outdoor linear accelerator operations at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Stand-off Experiments Range (SOX). The intent of this report is to inform and gain acceptance of this methodology from the governmental bodies regulating the INL.

Michael Sandvig

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

367

2008 LANL radionuclide air emissions report  

SciTech Connect

The emissions of radionuclides from Department of Energy Facilities such as Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) are regulated by the Amendments to the Clean Air Act of 1990, National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (40 CFR 61 Subpart H). These regulations established an annual dose limit of 10 mrem to the maximally exposed member of the public attributable to emissions of radionuclides. This document describes the emissions of radionuclides from LANL and the dose calculations resulting from these emissions for calendar year 2008. This report meets the reporting requirements established in the regulations.

Fuehne, David P.

2009-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

368

No-migration variance petition. Appendices A--B: Volume 2, Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Volume II contains Appendix A, emergency plan and Appendix B, waste analysis plan. The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Emergency plan and Procedures (WP 12-9, Rev. 5, 1989) provides an organized plan of action for dealing with emergencies at the WIPP. A contingency plan is included which is in compliance with 40 CFR Part 265, Subpart D. The waste analysis plan provides a description of the chemical and physical characteristics of the wastes to be emplaced in the WIPP underground facility. A detailed discussion of the WIPP Waste Acceptance Criteria and the rationale for its established units are also included.

Not Available

1990-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

369

U.S. Department of Energy Report, 2005 LANL Radionuclide Air Emissions  

SciTech Connect

Amendments to the Clean Air Act, which added radionuclides to the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), went into effect in 1990. Specifically, a subpart (H) of 40 CFR 61 established an annual limit on the impact to the public attributable to emissions of radionuclides from U.S. Department of Energy facilities, such as the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). As part of the new NESHAP regulations, LANL must submit an annual report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency headquarters and the regional office in Dallas by June 30. This report includes results of monitoring at LANL and the dose calculations for the calendar year 2006.

Keith W. Jacobson, David P. Fuehne

2006-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

370

U.S. DOE 2004 LANL Radionuclide Air Emissions  

SciTech Connect

Amendments to the Clean Air Act, which added radionuclides to the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), went into effect in 1990. Specifically, a subpart (H) of 40 CFR 61 established an annual limit on the impact to the public attributable to emissions of radionuclides from U.S. Department of Energy facilities, such as the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). As part of the new NESHAP regulations, LANL must submit an annual report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency headquarters and the regional office in Dallas by June 30. This report includes results of monitoring at LANL and the dose calculations for the calendar year 2004.

K.W. Jacobson

2005-08-12T23:59:59.000Z

371

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers; Guidance for Calculating Efficiency Credits Resulting from Implementation of Energy Conservation Measures  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this document is to provide guidance for developing a consistent approach to documenting efficiency credits generated from energy conservation measures in the Implementation Plan for boilers covered by the Boiler MACT rule (i.e., subpart DDDDD of CFR part 63). This document divides Boiler System conservation opportunities into four functional areas: 1) the boiler itself, 2) the condensate recovery system, 3) the distribution system, and 4) the end uses of the steam. This document provides technical information for documenting emissions credits proposed in the Implementation Plan for functional areas 2) though 4). This document does not include efficiency improvements related to the Boiler tune-ups.

Cox, Daryl [ORNL; Papar, Riyaz [Hudson Technologies; Wright, Dr. Anthony [ALW Consulting

2013-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

372

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers; Guidance for Calculating Emission Credits Resulting from Implementation of Energy Conservation Measures  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this document is to provide guidance for developing a consistent approach to documenting efficiency credits generated from energy conservation measures in the Implementation Plan for boilers covered by the Boiler MACT rule (i.e., subpart DDDDD of CFR part 63). This document divides Boiler System conservation opportunities into four functional areas: 1) the boiler itself, 2) the condensate recovery system, 3) the distribution system, and 4) the end uses of the steam. This document provides technical information for documenting emissions credits proposed in the Implementation Plan for functional areas 2) though 4). This document does not include efficiency improvements related to the Boiler tune-ups.

Cox, Daryl [ORNL; Papar, Riyaz [Hudson Technologies; Wright, Dr. Anthony [ALW Consulting

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

373

U.S. Department of Energy NEPA Categorical Exclusion Determination Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ND-City-Bismarck ND-City-Bismarck Location: City Bismarck ND American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Proposed Action or Project Description: 1) Technical consultant to develop an energy efficiency and conservation strategy; 2) conduct energy audits at 12 city buildings; 3) energy efficient lighting retrofits at city buildings-relamp Civic Center and Exhibit Hall, delamp fixtures, install dimmable ballasts, and add occupancy sensors; and 4) implement Energy Services Management project. Conditions: None Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied: A9, A11, B2.5, B5.1 *-For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, see Subpart D of 10 CFR10 21

374

P:\DECISION\1102.tso.wpd  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the Matter of Personnel Security ) Filing Date: August 26, 2011 ) ) Case No. TSO-1102 ) ____________________________________) Issued: January 12, 2012 __________ Decision and Order __________ Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1/ under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations, I have

375

ADP38.tmp  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: October 23, 2012 ) ) Case No.: PSH-12-0125 ) __________________________________________) Issued: March 18, 2013 _______________ Hearing Officer Decision _______________ Steven L. Fine, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXX X. XXX (hereinafter referred to as "the Individual") to hold a security clearance under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant

376

Microsoft Word - PSH-13-0086.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

replaced replaced with XXXXXX's. United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: July 11, 2013 ) ) Case No.: PSH-13-0086 __________________________________________) Issued: October 30, 2013 _______________ Hearing Officer Decision _______________ Steven L. Fine, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXX X. XXX (hereinafter referred to as "the Individual") to hold a security clearance under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As

377

Microsoft Word - CX-AlveyMaintenanceHQ_PoleStorageUpgrade_WEB.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Brett Sherer Project Manager - KEP-4 Proposed Action: Environmental protection system upgrades at pole storage facility at Alvey Maintenance Headquarters. Budget Information: Work Order #00283226 Categorical Exclusion Applied (Appendix B to Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B4.6: Additions or modifications to electric power transmission facilities that would not affect the environment beyond the previously developed facility area including, but not limited to, switchyard rock grounding upgrades, secondary containment projects, paving projects, seismic upgrading, tower modifications, changing insulators, and replacement of poles, circuit breakers, conductors, transformers, and crossarms.

378

Microsoft Word - Esquatzel_Project_2011.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

James Hall James Hall Project Manager - TPC-TPP-4 Proposed Action: Esquatzel Project Budget Information: WO# 257267, Task 01 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B1.7 "Acquisition, installation, operation, and removal of communication systems, data processing equipment, and similar electronic equipment." Location: Franklin County, Washington Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Description of the Proposed Action: In response to Green Energy Today's small generator interconnection request, BPA is planning to integrate their 1.1-MW Esquatzel Hydro Generation Project into its balancing authority (BA). The proposed point of interconnection is at Pole 66 G 1229 on the Bureau of Reclamation's

379

Microsoft Word - LowerJocko_Acquisition_CX_final_081310.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6, 2010 6, 2010 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Cecilia Brown Project Manager - KEWM-4 Proposed Action: Provision of funds to Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes (CSKT) for purchase of the Lower Jocko River Property Fish and Wildlife Project No.: 2002-003-00, Contract # BPA-44646 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B1.25 Transfer, lease, disposition or acquisition of interests in uncontaminated land for habitat preservation or wildlife

380

2010 LANL radionuclide air emissions report /  

SciTech Connect

The emissions of radionuclides from Department of Energy Facilities such as Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) are regulated by the Amendments to the Clean Air Act of 1990, National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (40 CFR 61 Subpart H). These regulations established an annual dose limit of 10 mrem to the maximally exposed member of the public attributable to emissions of radionuclides. This document describes the emissions of radionuclides from LANL and the dose calculations resulting from these emissions for calendar year 2010. This report meets the reporting requirements established in the regulations.

Fuehne, David P.

2011-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "helium-48 cfr subpart" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. BM-OM-1006  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OM-1006 OM-1006 Title: Video Inspection of BM 36-inch Raw Water Pipeline Description: Subcontractor shall shall provide all supervision, labor, materials, tools, supplies, transportation, facilities, equipment, and services to perform the work in connection with the piping inspection and video analysis as required for the BM 36-inch Raw Water pipeline from the RWIS pig receiver to the High Pressure Pump Pad pig launcher. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions).

382

Microsoft Word - BM-MM-762A,GFE.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A A Title: Replace Brine Disposal System Header to BM Brine Tank, GFE Description: Manufacturer shall provide the piping and fittings associated with the replacement of the brine disposal system header to the BM Brine Tank as Government Furnished Equipment (GFE). The manufacturer shall load all materials onto transports supplied by others. Installation will be performed by others under BM-MM-762. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions).

383

Summit Manufacturing: Noncompliance Determination (2010-SE-0303)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the the Matter of: Summit Manufacturing, Inc. Case Number 2010-SE-0303 NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE DETERMINATION CERTIFICATION Manufacturers of certain covered products are required to certify compliance with the applicable energy conservation standards through submission of a compliance statement and a certification report. 10 CFR § 430.62. See 42 U.S.C. 6296 . The compliance statement is a legal statement by the manufacturer that the information provided in its certification reports is true , accurate and complete, that the basic models certified meet the applicable energy conservation standard, that the energy efficiency information report is the result of testing performed in conformance with the applicable test requirements in 10 CFR part 430, subpart B; and that the manufacturer is

384

2009 Performance Assessment for the Saltstone Disposal Facility |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Performance Assessment for the Saltstone Disposal Facility Performance Assessment for the Saltstone Disposal Facility 2009 Performance Assessment for the Saltstone Disposal Facility This Performance Assessment (PA) for the Savannah River Site (SRS) was prepared to support the operation and eventual closure of the Saltstone Disposal Facility (SDF). This PA was prepared to demonstrate compliance with the pertinent requirements of the United States Department of Energy (DOE) Order 435.1, Change 1, Radioactive Waste Management, Chapter IV, and Title 10, of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 61, Licensing Requirements for Land Disposal of Radioactive Waste, Subpart C as required by the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2005, Section 3116. [DOE O 435.1-1, 10 CFR 61, NDAA_3116]

385

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. BM-07-072D and WH-07-073A  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

07-072D and WH-07-073A 07-072D and WH-07-073A Title: Installation of BM and WH Wellhead Survey Monuments Description: Subcontractor shall provide all labor, supervision, materials, consumables, equipment, tools, storage, transportation, and services required for the installation of new wellhead survey monuments at the Bryan Mound and West Hackberry SPR sites. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a Significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following:

386

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determination  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

North Oakes tap of the Edgeley to Forman 69 kV line North Oakes tap of the Edgeley to Forman 69 kV line Description of Proposed Action: Central Power Electric Cooperative is proposing to tap into the Western Area Power Administration (Western) Edgeley to Forman 69 kV transmission line with a new substation to meet load growth in the Southeastern North Dakota area. Number and Title of Categorical Exclusions Being Applied: 10 CFR 1021.410 Subpart D, Appendix B, B4.11: Construction of electric power substations ... or modification of existing substations and support facilities. Regulatory Requirements for CX Determination: The DOE Guidelines for Compliance with the Regulatory Requirements for the National Environmental Policy Act at 10 CFR 1021.410(b), require the following determinations be made in order for a proposed action to be categorically

387

Document ID Number: RL-721 REV4 NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, Rev 0 5, Rev 0 I. Project Title: MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Polychlorinated Biphenyl Removal under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, Bl.l7 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions ·e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform removal of polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)-containing items (including, but not limited to, transformers and capacitors), PCB-containing oils flushed from transformers, PCB-flushing solutions, and PCB-containing spill materials from buildings or other aboveground locations in accordance with applicable requirements (40 CFR part 761). PCB and PCB-containing items will be

388

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determination  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letcher to Mitchell 115 kV transmission line to Western's Letcher to Mitchell 115 kV transmission line to Western's Letcher substation. Description of Proposed Action: Interconnection of Northwestern Energy's 115 kV Letcher to Mitchell transmission line at Western's Letcher substation. Northwestern Energy is proposing to build a 14.5 mile transmission line between their Mitchell substation and Western's Letcher substation to shore up reliability of their electrical system in the area. Number and Title of Categorical Exclusions Being Applied: 10 CFR 1021.410 Subpart D, Appendix B, B4.11: Construction of electric power substations ... or modification of existing substations and support facilities. Regulatory Requirements for CX Determination: The DOE Guidelines for Compliance with the Regulatory Requirements for the National Environmental Policy Act at 10 CFR 1021.41 O(b), require the

389

Chapter_1_Physical_Security  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Physical Security Physical Security This chapter describes the security procedures adopted by DOE HQ to implement the requirements of the following DOE directives: * Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 860.4 * Title 41 CFR Parts 101-19.3 and 102.74, Subpart C * Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD)-12, Policy for a Common Identification Standard for Federal Employees and Contractors * DOE Order 473.3, Protection Program Operations * DOE Order 471.6, Information Security * DOE Order 580.1, Change 1, DOE Personal Property Management Program The objective of these directives is to protect DOE sensitive and classified information, facilities, property, and employees from threats posed by intelligence collectors, terrorists, violent activists,

390

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. BH-MM-1066A, BM-1067A, WH-1068A  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A, BM-1067A, WH-1068A A, BM-1067A, WH-1068A Title: Variable Frequency Drivers for RWIS Pumps GFE Description: Vendor shall provide and deliver variable frequency drivers for the Raw Water Intake Structure (RWIS) pumps at the Big Hill, Bryan Mound, and West Hackberry SPR sites as Government Furnished Equipment (GFE). Installation will be performed by others. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following:

391

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. WH-09-086  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09-086 09-086 Title: Replace WH Radio Tower Description: Subcontractor shall provide all labor, tools, equipment, materials, consumables, services, insurance, transportation. storage, and supervision necessary to design and install a new guyed radio tower, foundations, antenna wiring, lighting, grounding to replace the existing WH radio tower and associated equipment. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and 8 of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following:

392

DOE Guidance-Category Rating  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2010 2010 MEMORANDUM FOR HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTORS FROM: SARA"iJ. Boku1, DIRECToR OF HUMAN C~TAL MANAGEMENT SUBJECT: GUIDANCE MEMORANDUM #10 CATEGORY RATING The purpose of this memorandum is to establish the Department of Energy's (DOE's) policy for the use of Category Rating. Authorities: Public Law 107-296; Title 5 USC 3319; 5 CFR, Part 337, Subpart C., Presidential Memorandum of May 11, 2010 This guidance is established in accordance with 5 USC 3319, which authorizes Federal Agencies to use alternative rating proced.ures in assessing applicants for employment using category rating and selection procedures, and to ensure consistency in complying with federal regulations contained in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and the Department of

393

NEPAREVIEW LAN-ll-0003 2. CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION BEING APPLIED:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPAREVIEW NEPAREVIEW LAN-ll-0003 2. CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION BEING APPLIED: 10 CFR 1021, Appendix B 6.8: Minor operational changes at an existing facility to minimize waste generation and for reuse of materials. These changes include, but are not limited to, adding filtration and recycle piping to allow reuse of machining oil, setting up a sorting area to improve process efficiency, and segregating two waste streams previously mingled and assigning new identification codes to the two resulting wastes. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS IN 10 CFR 1021.410 (B): 1. The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix B to Subpart D. For classes of actions listed in Appendix B, the following conditions are integral elements (Le., to fit within a class), the proposal must not:

394

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

51 - 2560 of 26,777 results. 51 - 2560 of 26,777 results. Download fleetappforms04f1298.doc http://energy.gov/management/downloads/fleetappforms04f1298doc0 Download Inspection Letter Report: INS-L-09-04 Letter Report on Department of Energy Funding of Tribal Colleges and Universities http://energy.gov/ig/downloads/inspection-letter-report-ins-l-09-04 Download HRAversion4-9-04.doc http://energy.gov/management/downloads/hraversion4-9-04doc Download Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-04: Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.23 and Compliance Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR Subpart C DOE's Operational Procedures for Enforcement (June 1998), which supercede the DOE Enforcement Handbook (1087-95), provides the Office of Enforcement and Investigation with the opportunity to issue...

395

Microsoft Word - MS-OM-1185NEPAHeatExchanger.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MS-OM-1185 MS-OM-1185 Title: Hydrogen Peroxide Treatment of SPR Heat Exchangers BOA Description: Subcontractor shall provide all labor, supervision, materials, supplies, equipment, tools, and transportation required to treat the water side of the SPR heat exchangers. Work includes providing turnkey chemical injection equipment, chemical (hydrogen peroxide), chemical containment vessels, and fittings/piping/tubing required to connect the chemical injection equipment to the site heat exchangers. Subcontractor shall remove and clean all equipment and properly dispose of any waste materials after the work is completed. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do

396

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. BC-10-077A  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7A 7A Title: Refurbish BC Static Mixer GFE Description: Subcontractor shall provide all supervision, transportation, labor, materials, and equipment to pickup, refurbish, install new baffles, and deliver an axial flow type mixer for crude oil service to the Bayou Choctaw SPR site. Government will furnish the old static mixer complete with flanges. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following:

397

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. BH-OM-1065A  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A A Title: Transport and Perform TD&I on BHTX-29 Transformer Description: Subcontractor shall provide all labor, supervision, tools, lifting and transportation services required to transport the BHTX-29 transformer to an offsite facility to perform tear down and inspection (TD&I) and testing. Proper lift and transportation equipment will be required to load and transport the BHTX-29 transformer from the Big Hill site. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment

398

U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave, SW  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of: of: Aspen Manufacturing Case Number 2010-SE-0305 NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE DETERMINATION CERTIFICATION Manufacturers of certain covered products are required to certify compliance with the applicable energy conservation standards through submission of a compliance statement and a certification report. 10 CFR § 430.62. See 42 U.S.C. 6296. The compliance statement is a legal statement by the manufacturer that the information provided in its certification reports is true, accurate and complete, that the basic models certified meet the applicable energy conservation standard, that the energy efficiency information report is the result of testing performed in conformance with the applicable test requirements in 10 CFR part 430, subpart B; and that the manufacturer is

399

Zoe Industries, Inc.  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

D.C. 20585 D.C. 20585 ) ) ) ) ) Case Number: 2011-SW-2912 Issued: September 28, 2011 NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE DETERMINATION Manufacturers and private labelers are prohibited from distributing covered products that do not comply with applicable Federal water conservation standards. 10 C.F.R. § 429.102; 42 U.S.C. § 6302. On July 20, 2011, DOE tested four units of the Giessdorf eight-jet basic model showerhead, SKU 150043 ("Giessdorf 150043"), manufactured by GiessdorfPlumbing, Inc. ("Giessdorf"), and imported by Zoe Industries, Inc. ("Zoe"), in accordance with DOE test procedures (10 C.F.R. Part 430, Subpart B, Appendix S). DOE's testing demonstrated that the Giessdorf 150043 model is not in compliance with Federal law. First, Federal water conservation standards require that the water flow for a showerhead

400

Exceptions to DOE Rules and Regulations | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Exceptions to DOE Rules and Regulations Exceptions to DOE Rules and Regulations Exceptions to DOE Rules and Regulations The Department of Energy (DOE) issues test procedures and regulations covering a number of products, but does provide for exceptions to these rules under certain circumstances. Any person, as defined by 10 CFR 1003.2, can apply to the DOE for an exception from a rule, regulation, or DOE action having the effect of a rule, as provided for in section 504 of 42 U.S.C. 7194 and codified in 10 CFR 1003 subpart B. The DOE Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) is responsible for issuing an order either granting or denying the application, in whole or in part, based upon a showing of serious hardship, gross inequity or unfair distribution of burdens, after considering the application and other

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "helium-48 cfr subpart" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

certification_samplingplan.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Applicable Sampling Plan Applicable Sampling Plan for Certification of Consumer Products The Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, as amended, (EPCA or the ''Act'') authorizes the Department of Energy (DOE or the ''Department'') to enforce compliance with the energy conservation standards established for certain consumer products and commercial equipment. 42 U.S.C. §§ 6299-6305. To ensure that all covered products distributed in the United States comply with DOE's energy conservation standards, the Department has promulgated enforcement regulations, which include specific certification and compliance requirements. See 10 CFR part 430, subpart F. Each manufacturer must certify that each basic model meets the applicable energy conservation standard before distributing that model in commerce. 10 CFR 430.62(a). To

402

U.S. Department of Energy NEPA Categorical Exclusion Determination Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

mail mail u.s. Department of Energy Categorical Exclusion Determination Form Proposed Action Title: Energy Efficiency Retrofits Program or Field Office: EERE RW EECBG Location(s) (City/County/State):Cily of Hanford, CA Proposed Action Descriotion: The City of Hanford proposes to replace outdated air conditioning units which have reached then end of their functioning life with energy efficinet models, in various municipal facilities. None are on Historic Register. Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied : 85.1 - Actions to conserve energy or water For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, including the full text of each categorical exclusion, see Subpart 0 of 10 CFR Part 1021 . Regulatory Requirements in 10 CFR I021AIO(b): (See full text in regulation)

403

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

91 - 9200 of 28,905 results. 91 - 9200 of 28,905 results. Download crd title p1.ai http://energy.gov/downloads/crd-title-p1ai-4 Download Liquefied Natural Gas: Understanding the Basic Facts http://energy.gov/fe/downloads/liquefied-natural-gas-understanding-basic-facts Download DOE-STD-1104-96 Review and Approval of Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Documents (Documented Safety Analysis and Technical Safety Requirements) Replaced by DOE-STD-1104-2009 |CHANGE NOTICE NO. 3 (December 2005) First of many: The following guiding principles pertain to the application and provisions of this Standard. · The documents (i.e., DOE orders, manuals, guides, and standards) listed in Table 2 of Appendix A to 10 CFR 830 Subpart B provide approved methodologies for meeting the DSA requirements of 10 CFR 830. Developed consistent with and as a companion to

404

Microsoft Word - WH-MM-818B-819B NEPA.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8B & WH-MM-819B 8B & WH-MM-819B Title: Repair WH Brine Tanks, WHT-14 & WHT-15 Description: Subcontractor shall shall provide all materials, tools, equipment, supplies, transportation, facilities, labor, supervision, and services required to perform the work associated with the repair of the WH Brine Tanks, WHT-14 & WHT-15. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following:

405

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Title: Price Competitive Sale of Strategic Petroleum Reserve Petroleum, Standard Sales  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Title: Price Competitive Sale of Strategic Petroleum Reserve Petroleum, Standard Sales Title: Price Competitive Sale of Strategic Petroleum Reserve Petroleum, Standard Sales Provisions, Revised Appendix A to Final Sales Rule Description: Publication in the Federal Register of Standard Sales Provisions containing or describing contract clauses, terms and conditions of sale, and performance and financial and responsibility measures which may be used for particular sales of Strategic Petroleum Reserve Petroleum Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in appendices A and B to this subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions).

406

tee0062.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

, 2010 , 2010 DECISION AND ORDER OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Case Name: United CoolAir Corp. Date of Filing: September 23, 2009 Case Number: TEE-0062 This Decision and Order considers an Application for Exception filed by United CoolAir Corporation (United CoolAir) seeking exception relief from the provisions of 10 C.F.R. Part 431, Subpart F, Energy Conservation Program for Certain Commercial and Industrial Equipment: Commercial Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps Energy Conservation Standards (Commercial Air Conditioner Standards). 1 In its Application, United CoolAir asserts that the firm would suffer serious hardship, inequity, or unfair distribution of burdens if required to comply with the 13 SEER energy efficiency standard effective January 1, 2010, 10 C.F.R. § 431.97(b). If United

407

Microsoft Word - BH-MM-1024 NEPA.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Title: Replace BH Circuit Breakers OCB-4009, 4010 and 4011 (Install) Description: Subcontractor shall provide all labor, supervision, tools, equipment, materials (except GFE) and transportation required to remove existing BH oil circuit breakers OCB-4009, 4010 and 4011 and install three new 138 kV SF 6 circuit breakers (supplied as government furnished equipment) on the existing foundations. Tasks include all electrical work and testing of equipment. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment

408

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project 10 No. BM-OM-1006  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Title: Diver Inspection of BM 36" Raw Water Pipeline Description: Subcontractor shall provide all supervision, labor, materials, tools, supplies, transportation, facilities, equipment, and services required to perform piping inspection, ultrasonic inspections, and take epoxy impressions and photographs of the BM Raw Water pipeline from the pig receiver to the High Pressure Pump Pad pig launcher. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following:

409

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. WH-11-057  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1-057 1-057 Title: Clean, Seal, and Paint WH Buildings RW MCC 392, Substation 390 and MCC 317 Description: Subcontractor shall furnish all materials, tools, equipment, transportation, supplies, facilities, utilities, labor and supervision required to pressure wash, seal, and paint the WH buildings RW MCC 392, Substation 390 and MCC 317. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following:

410

Slide 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Bridge Data Call and of Bridge Data Call and Public Road Inventory Understanding the Requirements Cindy Hunt, P.E., LEED AP Facilities Engineer Office of Engineering and Construction Management U. S. Department of Energy August 4, 2009 2 Governing Regulations * Vehicle Bridges - The 23 CFR Part 650, Subpart C - National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS), sets national standards for the proper safety inspection and evaluation of all highway bridges. The NBIS apply to all structures defined as highway bridges located on public roads. * Train Bridges - 49 CFR Part 213, Appendix C - Statement of Agency Policy on the Safety of Railroad Bridges, Railroad Implementation of Bridge Safety Programs - American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association (AREMA) Bridge Inspection Handbook

411

TEE-0062 - In the Matter of United CoolAir Corp. | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TEE-0062 - In the Matter of United CoolAir Corp. TEE-0062 - In the Matter of United CoolAir Corp. TEE-0062 - In the Matter of United CoolAir Corp. This Decision and Order considers an Application for Exception filed by United CoolAir Corporation (United CoolAir) seeking exception relief from the provisions of 10 C.F.R. Part 431, Subpart F, Energy Conservation Program for Certain Commercial and Industrial Equipment: Commercial Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps Energy Conservation Standards (Commercial Air Conditioner Standards).1 In its Application, United CoolAir asserts that the firm would suffer serious hardship, inequity, or unfair distribution of burdens if required to comply with the 13 SEER energy efficiency standard effective January 1, 2010, 10 C.F.R. § 431.97(b). If United CoolAir's Application for Exception were granted, the firm would

412

DOE-HDBK-1105-2002 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 07, 2006 December 07, 2006 Radiological Training for Tritium Facilities, Replaced by DOE-HDBK-1105-2002 | Change Notice No. 1 with Reaffirmation (January 2007) | Change Notice No. 2 (May 2007) This Handbook describes a recommended implementation process for conducting the radiation safety training required by Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations Occupational Radiation Protection, (10 CFR 835) Subpart J and as outlined in the DOE standard DOE-STD-1098-99, Radiological Control (RCS). The Handbook is to assist those individuals, both within the Department of Energy (DOE) and Managing and Operating (M&O) contractors, identified as having responsibility for implementing the training required by 10 CFR 835 and recommended by the RCS. DOE-HDBK-1105-2002, Radiological Training for Tritium Facilities

413

Microsoft Word - BH-09-038A NEPA.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A A Title: Lower BH 36" Crude Oil Pipeline at the Needmore Diversion Channel GFE Description: Manufacturer/supplier shall provide 36" diameter pipe with fusion bonded epoxy coating, for crude oil service and store the pipe material until picked up by others. The manufacturer/supplier shall load materials onto Contractor supplied transportation. Installation of this Government Furnished Equiopment (GFE) will be performed by others under BH-09-038. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment

414

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. Multiple  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Smart and Calibrated Pig Surveys of SPR Raw Water/Crude Oil Pipelines, 2013-2018 Smart and Calibrated Pig Surveys of SPR Raw Water/Crude Oil Pipelines, 2013-2018 Description: Subcontractor shall provide all labor, materials, supervision, equipment and transportation required to perform a 360 o internal high resolution instrumented corrosiontoo survey (smart survey) and a 360 o internal high electronic caliper pig survey of raw water and crude oil pipelines at all SPR sites from 2013-2018, as required. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions).

415

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. BH-10-028  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10-028 10-028 Title: Re-seal Polyurethane Overcoat on BH Substation Relay Building 814 Description: Subcontractor shall furnish all services, tools, equipment, supplies, transportation, facilities, labor, supervision, and materials needed to repair, clean, and re-coat the existing Polyurethane Foam Roofing System on the BH Substation relay Building 814. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following:

416

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

obtain an easement for an existing access road obtain an easement for an existing access road which is located in Carroll County, Arkansas. The easement will serve to facilitate Southwestern's electrical utility vehicles accessing electrical transmission line 3008, near structure 33, in Carroll County, Arkansas. PROPOSED BY: Southwestern Power Administration- U.S. Dept. of Energy DATE: January 28, 2011 NUMBERS AND TITLES OF THE CATEGORICAL EXCLUSIONS BEING APPLIED: 10 CFR 1021, Appendix B to Subpart D, Part B1.24- Transfer, lease, disposition or acquisition of interests in uncontaminated permanent or temporary structures, equipment therein, and only land that is necessary for use of the transferred structures and equipment, for residential, commercial, or industrial uses. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS IN 10 CFR 1021.410(B):

417

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. BH-OM-1012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OM-1012 OM-1012 Title: BH Raw Water Brine Header Piping Inspection Description: Subcontractor shall provide all supervision, transportation, labor, materials and equipment required to locate, excavate, and inspect two locations of the BH Raw Water/Brine Site Piping Header. Inspections will be performed by Automated Ultrasonic Testing. All work will be done on Government property. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart 0 are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following:

418

BEFORE THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

LLC LLC (freezers) ) ) ) ) ) Case Number: 20 11-SE-14 28 · Issued: April 23, 2013 NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE DETERMINATION Manufacturers and private labelers are prohibited from distributing covered products that do not comply with applicable federal energy conservation standards. 10 C.F.R. § 429.102; 42 U.S.C. § 6302. Baier America Trading, LLC ("Haier") is a private labeler that owns the "Haier" trademark to distribute refrigerators, freezers, and refrigerator-freezers in the United States. 1 DOE completed testing of four units basic m o d e l - , manufactm·ed i~ and distributed States as Haier model HMCM106EA ("the Haier HMCMI 06EA"). These tests were condtJcted in accordance with the relevant DOE test procedures. See 10 C.F.R. Part 430, Subpart B, Appendix Bl.

419

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. WH-MM-1000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MM-1000 MM-1000 Title: Inspection and Repair of WH-SUN 42-inch Crude Oil Pipeline Description: Subcontractor shall provide all supervision, transportation, labor, materials and equipment required to locate, excavate, and inspect an internal corrosion anomaly at two locations on the WH to SUN Terminal 42-inch crude oil pipeline. Inspections will be performed by Automated Ultrasonic Testing. Repairs shall be performed based on the inspection results. All work will be performed on the DOE pipeline right-of-way. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment

420

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. BC-MM-772C  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

772C 772C Title: Tear Down, Inspect and Repair BC Brine Filters at BOW Pad 1 Description: Subcontractor shall provide all supervision, transportation, labor, materials and equipment required to pickup, inspect, refurbish, install new closures, blast and paint, and deliver three filter pod vessels for brine disposal service at BC. The existing filter pods will be disconnected from piping by OM personnel. Site personnel and equipment will be available for loading/unloading the filter pods onto the subcontractor's transport vehicle during pickup and delivery. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart 0 are classes of actions that DOE has

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "helium-48 cfr subpart" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. BH-DS-171  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DS-171 DS-171 Title: Use RW Surge Line to BH Anhydrite Pond for RWIS Recycle Description: DOE M&O Contractor will cap the existing recycle line at the BH raw water intake structure for repair work and install a valve in place of the existing surge relief valve to serve as a recycle valve to control flow from the BH raw water intake pumps. The raw water surge line will discharge to the BH anhydrite pond while repairs are being made to the recycle line. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart 0 are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment

422

BEFORE THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Watermark Designs, Ltd. Watermark Designs, Ltd. (Showerheads) ) ) ) ) ) Case Number: 2011-SW-2908 Issued: September 26, 2011 NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE DETERMINATION Manufacturers and private labelers are prohibited from distributing covered products that do not comply with applicable Federal water conservation standards. 10 C.F.R. § 429.102; 42 U.S. C. § 6302. On July 25, 2011, DOE tested four units of Watermark brand showerhead model SH-FAL-90 manufactured by Watermark Designs, Ltd. (Watermark) in accordance with DOE test procedures (1 0 C.F.R. Part 430, Subpart B, Appendix S). DOE's testing demonstrated that Watermark showerhead model number SH-FAL-90 is not in compliance with Federal law. First, Federal water conservation standards require that the water flow for a showerhead may not exceed 2.5 gallons of water per minute (gpm). Watermark

423

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. BM-MM-1152A  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

152A 152A Title: BM Brine Disposal Pump Replacement (GFE) Description: Subcontractor shall provide all labor, materials, tools, equipment, supervision, and transportation required to supply two pumps to replace the existing Bryan Mound brine disposal pumps, BMP-115 and BMP-116. Task include providing two completely assembled brine disposal pumps with base and motor as government furnished equipment (GFE). Installation of the pumps will be performed by others. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment

424

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

48A (GFE) and WH-MM-748 (Install) 48A (GFE) and WH-MM-748 (Install) Title: WH Brine Disposal Wells Control Systems Upgrade Description: Subcontractor shall provide Remote Operations Control equipment associated with WH-MM-748A required to upgrade the control systems of the WH Brine Disposal Wells. Subcontractor shall provide all labor, tools, materials, equipment and supervision associated with WH-MM-748 required to install the government furnished equipment procured under WH-MM-748A. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment

425

Microsoft InfoPath - NEPA_21124_306.xml  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

24A 24A Title: Replace BH Circuit Breakers OCB-4009, 4010 and 4011 (GFE) Description: Subcontractor shall provide all labor, supervision, tools, equipment, and transportation required to furnish three new 138 kV SF 6 circuit breakers to replace the existing BH oil circuit breakers OCB-4009, 4010 and 4011. This procurement will be Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) for installation by others. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following:

426

Water Tanks Demolition and Deactivation (D&D) Project (4589), 5/29/2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Water Tanks Demolition and Deactivation (D&D) Projects (4589) Water Tanks Demolition and Deactivation (D&D) Projects (4589) Program or Field Office: Y-12 Site Office Location(s) (City/County/State): Oak Ridge, Anderson County, Tennessee Proposed Action Description: Submit by E-mail The proposed action is to demolish and deactivate three water tanks, an electrical services shed and related out of service diesel generator on the south ridge. The tanks have already been isolated from the Y-12 potable water system. Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied: B 1.23 - Demolition and disposal of buildings For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, including the full text of each categorical exclusion, see Subpart D of 10 CFR Part 1021. Regulatory Requirements in 10 CFR 1021.410(b): (See full text in regulation)

427

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. BM-10-074  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

74 74 Title: BM Replace Interior and Exterior Entryway to Building 201 Description: Subcontractor shall provide all materials, equipment, tools, transportation, supervision, and labor needed to replace the interior and exterior entryway to BM Building 201. Tasks include replacement of the entryways with new glass, framing, doors, door hardware, closing devices, glass tinting, and signage. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following:

428

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. Multiple  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Workover Support Activities, 2016-2020 Workover Support Activities, 2016-2020 Description: This document covers the support activities of equipment rental, purchase of materials (pipe casing, etc.) and services under DM supervision for oil caverns and/or brine disposal wells associated with SPR Site Workovers during the period from 2016 to 2020. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following:

429

DOE-STD-3009-94 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9-94 9-94 DOE-STD-3009-94 March 24, 2006 Preparation Guide for U.S. Department of Energy Nonreactor Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analyses, Change Notice No. 3 CHANGE NOTICE NO.1 (January 2000) | CHANGE NOTICE NO. 2 (April 2002) | CHANGE NOTICE NO. 3 (March 2006) This Standard describes a DSA preparation method that is acceptable to the DOE as delineated for those specific facilities listed in Table 2 of Appendix A, "General Statement of Safety Basis Policy", to Subpart B, "Safety Basis Requirements", of 10 CFR 830. It was developed to assist Hazard Category 2 and 3 facilities in preparing SARs that will satisfy the requirements of 10 CFR 830. DOE-STD-3009-94, Preparation Guide for U.S. Department of Energy Nonreactor Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analyses, Change Notice No. 3

430

Microsoft Word - BM-MM-755.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

55 55 Title: Repair and Line BM Brine Tank, BMT-1 Description: Subcontractor shall provide all transportation, materials, equipment, supplies, tools, facilities, utilities, labor and supervision required to repair and line the BM brine tank, BMT-1. The tank will be cleaned by others before turning it over to the Subcontractor for repairs. Tasks include welding repair work (if required), welding inspection, tank surface preparation, and lining. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment

431

U.S. Department of Energy NEPA Categorical Exclusion Determination Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

@ @ Submit by E-mail , ~' . U.S. Department of Energy ., . I · " Categorical Exclusion Determination Form Proposed Action Title: Building light retrofits/upgrade Program or Field Office: EERE RW EECBG Location(s) (City/County/State): Rancho Santa Margarita, CA Proposed Action Description: Upgrade incandescent bulbs to LED bulbs at City Hall and Community Center. Categorical Exclusion(sl Applied: B5.1 * Actions to conserve energy or water For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, including the full text of each categorical exclusion, see Subpart D of 10 CFR Part 1021 . Regulatory Requirements in 10 CFR 1021.41 O(b): (See full text in regulation) [ZJrhe proposal fits within a class of

432

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determination  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Circle substation expansion Circle substation expansion Description of Proposed Action: Expansion of the Circle substation approximately 4 acres to the south for the purpose of adding additional bays for the Keystone XL pipeline project. Number and Title of Categorical Exclusions Being Applied: 10 CFR 1021.410 Subpart D, Appendix B, B4.11: Construction of electric power substations ... or modification of existing substations and support facilities. Regulatory Requirements for CX Determination: The DOE Guidelines for Compliance with the Regulatory Requirements for the National Environmental Policy Act at 10 CFR 1021.410(b), require the following determinations be made in order for a proposed action to be categorically excluded from National Environmentally Policy Act (NEPA) review:

433

Milling Machine Replacement Project (4587), 5/11/2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Milling Machine Replacement Projects (4587) Milling Machine Replacement Projects (4587) Program or Field Office: Y-12 Site Office Location(s) (City/County/State): Oak Ridge, Anderson County, Tennessee Proposed Action Description: Submit by E-mail The proposed action is to replace two large milling machines with two new medium sized CNC milling machines. The new machines will be connected to the digital network communication (DNC) system. Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied: 81.31 -Installation or relocation of machinery and equipment For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, including the full text of each categorical exclusion, see Subpart D of 10 CFR Part 1021. Regulatory Requirements in 10 CFR 1021.410(b): (See full text in regulation)

434

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. BH-09-080  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Door Repairs Door Repairs Description: Subcontractor shall provide all materials, equipment, tools, transportation, supervision, labor, mobile lifting equipment, and rigging needed to repair the doors on BH Buildings 802 and 812. Tasks include replacing one damaged coiling steel door, one damaged pedestrian door and damaged building components on BH Building 802; and replacing two corroded pedestrian doors, their frames and hardware, and damaged building trim components on BH Building 812. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment

435

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. WH-MM-767A  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A A Title: Replace Brine Disposal System Header to WH Brine Tanks, GFE Description: Manufacturer shall provide the piping and fittings associated with the replacement of the brine disposal system header to the WH Brine Tanks as Government Furnished Equipment (GFE). The manufacturer shall load all materials onto transports supplied by others. Installation will be performed by others under BM-MM-767. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions).

436

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. WH-MM-816  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

816 816 Title: WH Building 301 AHU-1 HVAC Replacement Description: Subcontractor shall provide all labor, tools, materials, equipment and supervision required to replace the WH Building 301 Air Handling Unit (AHU-1) and its associated air cooled condensing unit at the West Hackberry SPR site for the existing Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) unit. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following:

437

GRR/Section 4-FD-c - Exploration Application Process USFS | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

4-FD-c - Exploration Application Process USFS 4-FD-c - Exploration Application Process USFS < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 4-FD-c - Exploration Application Process USFS 04FDCExplorationApplicationProcessUSFS (3).pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies United States Forest Service Bureau of Land Management Regulations & Policies Memorandum of Understanding between DOI and DOA 43 CFR 3200, Subpart 3252 - Conducting Exploration Operations 43 CFR 3250.10(b)(4) Triggers None specified Click "Edit With Form" above to add content 04FDCExplorationApplicationProcessUSFS (3).pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range.

438

TEE-0062 - In the Matter of United CoolAir Corp. | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 - In the Matter of United CoolAir Corp. 2 - In the Matter of United CoolAir Corp. TEE-0062 - In the Matter of United CoolAir Corp. This Decision and Order considers an Application for Exception filed by United CoolAir Corporation (United CoolAir) seeking exception relief from the provisions of 10 C.F.R. Part 431, Subpart F, Energy Conservation Program for Certain Commercial and Industrial Equipment: Commercial Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps Energy Conservation Standards (Commercial Air Conditioner Standards).1 In its Application, United CoolAir asserts that the firm would suffer serious hardship, inequity, or unfair distribution of burdens if required to comply with the 13 SEER energy efficiency standard effective January 1, 2010, 10 C.F.R. § 431.97(b). If United CoolAir's Application for Exception were granted, the firm would

439

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project 10 No. BM-11-051  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Title: BM Building BE-2 Drainage Improvements and Foundation Repair Description: Subcontractor shall furnish all labor, materials, equipment, tools, transportation, supervision, mobile lifting equipment, and rigging required to repair timber piles which support Bryan Mound Building BE-2. Subcontractor shall modify the ground surface around the building with crushed stone to prevent soil washout and improve drainage conditions which led to disrepair of the building foundation. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment

440

Microsoft InfoPath - nepa_19496.xml  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

67 67 Title: Replace Brine Disposal System Header to WH Brine Tanks Description: Subcontractor shall shall provide all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and supervision required to replace the existing brine disposal piping to the WH brine tanks with new cement lined piping and fittings, to be supplied by others as Government Furnished Equipment under WH-MM-767A. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following:

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "helium-48 cfr subpart" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

BEFORE THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

L.L.C. L.L.C. (Freezers) ) ) ) ) ) Case Number: 2011-SE-1408 Issued: October 18, 2011 NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE DETERMINATION Manufacturers and private labe1ers are prohibited from distributing covered products that do not comply with applicable federal energy conservation standards. 10 C.F.R. § 429.102; 42 U.S. C. § 6302. On July 30,2011, DOE completed testing of one compact chest freezer, Haier America Trading, L.L.C. ("Haier'') model number HNCM070, manufactured in China, in accordance with DOE test procedures (10 C.F.R. Part 430, Subpart B, Appendix A). In September 2011, DOE completed testing of three additional units ofHNCM070, in accordance with the same procedures. DOE's testing demonstrated that Haier chest freezer model number HNCM070 is not in

442

Microsoft Word - WH-MM-767B NEPA.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

67B 67B Title: Replace WH Brine Disposal System Header from MOV-51's to WHT-14/15 Brine Tanks with HDPE Pipe Description: Subcontractor shall provide all labor, tools, materials, equipment and supervision required to replace the WH brine disposal system header from MOV-51's to WHT-14/15 brine tanks with HDPE pipe. Tasks include demolishing existing piping, installing two new pipe support foundations, pipe support steel, pipe shoes and pipe supports, and HDPE piping. Subcontractor shall reuse existing pipe support foundations, pipe support steel and pipe shoes, and existing tank pipe supports. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has

443

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. WH-OM-1046  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

46 46 Title: Replacement Anode Bed on WH 42-inch Crude Oil Pipeline at Gum Cove Road Description: Subcontractor shall provide all materials, tools, equipment, supplies, transportation, facilities, labor, supervision, and services required for the installation of a new deep anode ground bed system on the WH 42-inch Crude Oil Pipeline at Gum Cove Road. Work consists of drilling operations, resistance log of well, component termination, and site cleanup. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment

444

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determination  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Addition of a new substation near Lake Bowdoin, MT. Addition of a new substation near Lake Bowdoin, MT. Description of Proposed Action: Addition of a new substation near Lake Bowdoin on Western's Fort Peck to Havre 161 k V transmission line for the purpose of providing power for a Keystone XL pipeline project pump station. Number and Title of Categorical Exclusions Being Applied: 10 CFR 1021.410 Subpart D, Appendix B, B4.11: Construction of electric power substations ... or modification of existing substations and support facilities. Regulatory Requirements for CX Determination: The DOE Guidelines for Compliance with the Regulatory Requirements for the National Environmental Policy Act at 10 CFR 1021.41 O(b), require the following determinations be made in order for a proposed action to be categorically

445

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. Multiple  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Bi-Annual Electrical PM (2012-2016) Bi-Annual Electrical PM (2012-2016) Description: Subcontractor shall provide all transportation, test/repair equipment, labor and technical supervision required to perform bi-annual preventative maintenance of all electrical equipment at all SPR sites from 2012-2016. Tasks include on-site testing, inspection, and calibration of the electrical equipment. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following:

446

Microsoft Word - BH-MM-1038 NEPA.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

38 38 Title: Recondition and Repair BHTX-14 Transformer Description: Subcontractor shall provide all labor, supervision, tools, equipment, and transportation required to remanufacture (including inspection and repair), transport, install, test, and pre-commission the BHTX-14 transformer. Work will be performed at the subcontractor's off-site facility. Proper lift and transportation equipment will be required to load and transport the BHTX-14 transformer from the off-site location to the Big Hill RWIS site. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment

447

Microsoft Word - BM-MM-762 NEPA.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

62 62 Title: Replace Brine Disposal System Header to BM Brine Tank Description: Subcontractor shall shall provide all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and supervision required to replace the existing brine disposal piping to the BM brine tank with new carbon steel pipe and concrete lined carbon steel pipe. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following:

448

Microsoft Word - BC-MM-815 NEPA.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

15 15 Title: BC Building 401 AHU-3 HVAC Replacement Description: Subcontractor shall provide all labor, tools, materials, equipment and supervision required to replace the BC Building 401 Air Handling Unit (AHU-3) and its associated air cooled condensing unit at the Bayou Choctaw SPR site for the existing Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) unit. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following:

449

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Fluor Fernald, Inc. - EA-2004-07 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fluor Fernald, Inc. - EA-2004-07 Fluor Fernald, Inc. - EA-2004-07 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Fluor Fernald, Inc. - EA-2004-07 August 9, 2004 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to Fluor Fernald, Inc., related to Respiratory Protection Issues at the Fernald Environmental Management Project This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement's (OE) recent review of programmatic failures involving the use of respiratory protection at the Waste Pit Project (WPP). Our review identified that specific noncompliances under 10 CFR 830, Subpart A, "Quality Assurance Requirements," and 10 CFR 835 "Occupational Radiation Protection" have occurred as described in the attached Preliminary Notice of Violation (PNOV). Fluor Fernald Inc.

450

Nuclear Facility Design  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Design Design FUNCTIONAL AREA GOAL: Headquarters and Field organizations and their contractors ensure that nuclear facilities are designed to assure adequate protection for the public, workers, and the environment from nuclear hazards. REQUIREMENTS:  10 CFR 830.120  10 CFR 830 subpart B  DOE O 413.3  DOE O 420.1B  DOE O 414.1C  DOE O 226.1  DOE M 426.1  DEAR 970-5404-2 Guidance:  DOE G 420.1-1  Project Management Practices, Integrated Quality ( Rev E, June 2003)  DOE Implementation Plan for DNSB Recommendation 2004-2 Performance Objective 1: Contractor Program Documentation Contracts between and the contractors who operate nuclear facilities contain adequate requirements concerning the conduct of nuclear facility safety design for nuclear facility capital projects and major modifications and the

451

Enforcement Action - EA-2005-05  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, 2005 5, 2005 Mr. Cornelius Murphy President Fluor Fernald, Inc. P.O. Box 538704 Cincinnati, OH 45253-8704 EA-2005-05 Subject: Preliminary Notice of Violation and Proposed Civil Penalty - $33,000 Dear Mr. Murphy: This letter refers to the radiation protection and quality improvement deficiencies that were identified as part of the recent Price-Anderson Amendments Act (PAAA) Program Review conducted at the Fernald site on July 11-14, 2005. These deficiencies were discussed with you during the outbriefing of that review on July 14, 2005. A report documenting the findings and conclusion of the PAAA Program Review is being issued under separate cover. Based on further evaluation of the deficiencies, DOE has concluded that violations of 10 CFR 835 and 10 CFR 830 Subpart A have taken place. Accordingly, DOE is issuing

452

U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave, SW  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Advanced Distributor Products ) Case Number 2010-SE-0304 NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE DETERMINATION CERTIFICATION Manufacturers of certain covered products are required to certify compliance with the applicable energy conservation standards through submission of a compliance statement and a certification report. 10 CFR § 430.62. See 42 U.S.C. 6296. The compliance statement is a legal statement by the manufacturer that the information provided in its certification reports is true, accurate and complete, that the basic models certified meet the applicable energy conservation standard, that the energy efficiency information report is the result of testing performed in conformance with the applicable test requirements in 10 CFR part 430, subpart B; and that the manufacturer is

453

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. BH-MM-785  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

85 85 Title: Install Temperature Monitoring on BH 36 inch Crude Oil Pipeline Description: Subcontractor shall shall provide all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and supervision required to install temperature monitoring instrumentation on the BH 36 inch crude oil pipeline at valve stations 8PL00-MOV-02, 8PL00-MOV-04, 8PL00-MOV-05, and 8PL00- MOV-15. Tasks include installation of thermocouples, transmitters, and cables. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment

454

Notice of Availability of the West Valley Demonstration Project Draft Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0377D) (May 16, 2003)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

87 87 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 95 / Friday, May 16, 2003 / Notices Specific financial data is used to make a preliminary determination as to whether a non-profit or for-profit institution is financially responsible under 34 CFR part 668, subpart L of the Student Assistance General Provisions regulations (or in the case of a change in ownership resulting in a change in control, whether the institution satisfies the financial ratio requirements under 34 CFR 668.15). Attaching an Authentic Copy of the Audits After an institution enters all requested information, it must attach (or upload) to the eZ-Audit Web page an electronic copy of any required compliance and financial statement audits that were prepared and signed by the independent auditor(s) engaged by

455

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Fluor Fernald, Inc. - EA-2004-07 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4-07 4-07 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Fluor Fernald, Inc. - EA-2004-07 August 9, 2004 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to Fluor Fernald, Inc., related to Respiratory Protection Issues at the Fernald Environmental Management Project This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement's (OE) recent review of programmatic failures involving the use of respiratory protection at the Waste Pit Project (WPP). Our review identified that specific noncompliances under 10 CFR 830, Subpart A, "Quality Assurance Requirements," and 10 CFR 835 "Occupational Radiation Protection" have occurred as described in the attached Preliminary Notice of Violation (PNOV). Fluor Fernald Inc. reported these programmatic failures into the Noncompliance Tracking System

456

RCRA designation of discarded americium/beryllium sealed sources  

SciTech Connect

Many sealed sources containing americium and beryllium are used throughout construction, industry, and research, and will eventually require disposal. For planning purposes it is necessary to determine whether these sources, when disposed, constitute a mixed waste, i.e., a waste containing hazardous constituents regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and radioactive constituents regulated under the Atomic Energy Act. Waste designation criteria contained in 40 CFR 261 are evaluated in detail in this report. It is determined that discarded americium/beryllium sealed sources do not contain any wastes listed in Subpart D of 40 CFR 261, nor do the discarded sources exhibit any hazardous characteristics. Therefore, it is concluded that discarded americium/beryllium sealed sources are not a mixed waste under regulations established by the US Environmental Protection Agency. Hazardous waste regulatory programs delegated to States, however, may have regulations that differ from those of the Federal government.

Kirner, N.P. [Ebasco Environmental, Idaho Falls, ID (United States)

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

457

EA-1872: Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Design Standards for New Federal Buildings  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of a proposal to amend the current rule for commercial and high-rise multi-family residential buildings, 10 CFR 433 Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and High-Rise Multi-Family Residential Buildings, to replace ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2004 with the more stringent ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2007, incorporated by reference. This EA will also also evaluate the environmental impacts with regard to low-rise residential buildings, this rulemaking updates 10 CFR 435 Subpart A, Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Residential Low-Rise Residential Buildings, to replace the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) 2004 by the more stringent IECC 2009, incorporated by reference.

458

Technical safety requirements for the Auxiliary Hot Cell Facility (AHCF).  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

These Technical Safety Requirements (TSRs) identify the operational conditions, boundaries, and administrative controls for the safe operation of the Auxiliary Hot Cell Facility (AHCF) at Sandia National Laboratories, in compliance with 10 CFR 830, 'Nuclear Safety Management.' The bases for the TSRs are established in the AHCF Documented Safety Analysis (DSA), which was issued in compliance with 10 CFR 830, Subpart B, 'Safety Basis Requirements.' The AHCF Limiting Conditions of Operation (LCOs) apply only to the ventilation system, the high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters, and the inventory. Surveillance Requirements (SRs) apply to the ventilation system, HEPA filters, and associated monitoring equipment; to certain passive design features; and to the inventory. No Safety Limits are necessary, because the AHCF is a Hazard Category 3 nuclear facility.

Seylar, Roland F.

2004-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

459

Oconee Nuclear Station Enclosures (see next page)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Energy Carolinas, LLC, (Duke) hereby submits an application for renewal of the Oconee Nuclear Station (ONS), Site-Specific Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) license. The current license expires on January 31, 2010. Based on the expected duration of the ONS 'plant licenses and the estimated time needed to remove the storage casks from the site, Duke is requesting a license renewal period of 40 years. An exemption request to support the license renewal period is provided as Enclosure 2. The application for renewal of the Site-Specific ISFSI license, Enclosure 3, was prepared in accordance with applicable provisions of 10 CFR 72, Subpart B, and the Preliminary NRC Staff Guidance for 10 CFR 72 License Renewal. A list of the regulatory commitments associated with this submittal is provided as Enclosure 4. The

Dave Baxter; Duke Energy Corporation; Pursuant To Cfr; Duke Power; Company Llc Duke

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

460

Enclosures (see next page)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Energy Carolinas, LLC, (Duke) hereby submits an application for renewal of the Oconee Nuclear Station (ONS), Site-Specific Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) license. The current license expires on January 31, 2010. Based on the expected duration of the ONS 'plant licenses and the estimated time needed to remove the storage casks from the site, Duke is requesting a license renewal period of 40 years. An exemption request to support the license renewal period is provided as Enclosure 2. The application for renewal of the Site-Specific ISFSI license, Enclosure 3, was prepared in accordance with applicable provisions of 10 CFR 72, Subpart B, and the Preliminary NRC Staff Guidance for 10 CFR 72 License Renewal. A list of the regulatory commitments associated with this submittal is provided as Enclosure 4. The

Dave Baxter; Duke Energy Corporation; Pursuant To Cfr; Duke Power; Company Llc Duke

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "helium-48 cfr subpart" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

DOE-STD-3009-94 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09-94 09-94 DOE-STD-3009-94 May 30, 2005 Preparation Guide for U. S. Department of Energy Nonreactor Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analysis CHANGE NOTICE NO. 1 (January 2000) | CHANGE NOTICE NO. 2 (April 2002) This Standard describes a DSA preparation method that is acceptable to the DOE as delineated for those specific facilities listed in Table 2 of Appendix A, "General Statement of Safety Basis Policy", to Subpart B, "Safety Basis Requirements", of 10 CFR 830. It was developed to assist Hazard Category 2 and 3 facilities. in preparing SARs that will satisfy the requirements of 10 CFR 830. DOE STD-3009-94, Preparation Guide for U. S. Department of Energy Nonreactor Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analysis DOE STD-3009-94, Preparation Guide for U. S. Department of Energy

462

certification_poststandardchange.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Certification Following a Change Certification Following a Change in the Applicable Energy or Water Conservation Standard The Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, as amended, (EPCA or the ''Act'') authorizes the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE or the ''Department'') to enforce compliance with the energy conservation standards established for certain consumer products and commercial equipment. 42 U.S.C. §§ 6299-6305 (consumer products), 6316 (commercial and industrial equipment). To ensure that all covered products distributed in the United States comply with DOE's energy conservation standards, the Department has promulgated enforcement regulations, which include specific certification and compliance requirements. See Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) part 430, subpart F; 10 CFR part 431,

463

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. BC-10-112  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

112 112 Title: Remove Abandoned BC Timber Bridge Over North/South Canal Description: Subcontractor shall furnish all materials, labor, equipment, supplies, transportation, facilities, supervision, and services required to remove and dispose of the abandoned BC Timber Bridge over the North/South Canal. Tasks also include installation of erosion protection/bank stabilization as required. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following:

464

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project 10 No. BM-OM-1001  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OM-1001 OM-1001 Title: Rework BM Seaway Dock Terminal Bypass Valve MOV-C30B Description: Subcontractor shall provide all supervision, transportation, labor, materials, and equipment required to perform valve repairs on the Seaway Dock Terminal bypass valve MOV-C30B. Work shall be performed on the valve inside the Seaway Dock Terminal. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following:

465

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. BC-MM-669 and BC-MM-673  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

669 and BC-MM-673 669 and BC-MM-673 Title: BC Site Building Upgrades, Phases II and III Description: Subcontractor shall provide all labor, tools, materials, equipment, and supervision required to perform various building upgrades at BC Buildings 401, 402, 403, 408, 415, and 416 (Phase II) and BC Buildings 401, 402, 413, and 414 (Phase III). Subcontractor shall evaluate and implement Green Building Design where applicable. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions).

466

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. WH-MM-668  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

668 668 Title: WH Pigging Water Disposal Description: Subcontractor shall provide all labor, tools, materials (except GFE), equipment and supervision to perform the work associated with the WH Pigging Water Disposal project. Tasks include construction of concrete foundations for pipe supports; installation, testing, and coating of piping; and associated electrical and instrumentation. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following:

467

Microsoft Word - SGIG FAQ Buy American final 01 12 2010.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Buy American Buy American Buy American 1 Question: Our understanding is that to the extent that the estimated value of a grant exceeds $7,443,000, the contractor may use in its performance either (1) "domestic" iron, steel or manufactured goods, or (2) iron, steel or manufactured goods which are manufactured in any of the "designated countries" listed in this clause. Please confirm. Answer: We cannot confirm your understanding. The requirement to adhere to U.S. obligations under international agreements found in section 1605(d) of the Recovery Act only pertains to international agreements listed in 2 CFR 176.90(b). This provision only applies to grantees that are listed or included within the entities listed in the Appendix to Subpart B of 2 CFR Part 176. If the iron, steel, or

468

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. WH-OM-1081  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

81 81 Title: Dredging of the WH Raw Water Intake Structure Description: Subcontractor shall shall provide all materials, tools, equipment, supplies, transportation, labor, supervision, and services required to perform the work associated with the dredging of the WH Raw Water Intake Structure approach channel of mud, silt, and debris, to include cleaning the pump intake sump. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following:

469

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Project ID No. BC-MM-1029, BH-MM-1030, BM-MM-1031, WH-MM-1032  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1029, BH-MM-1030, BM-MM-1031, WH-MM-1032 1029, BH-MM-1030, BM-MM-1031, WH-MM-1032 Title: Install Power Metering for SPR Site Buildings Description: Subcontractor shall provide all labor, tools, materials, equipment, and supervision required to install power metering at the four SPR sites. The meters will monitor energy consumption at the SPR site control, administrative, and maintenance buildings. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following:

470

Savannah River Tank Waste Residuals  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Savannah Savannah River Savannah River Tank Waste Residuals HLW Corporate Board November 6, 2008 1 November 6, 2008 Presentation By Sherri R. Ross Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office The Issue * How clean is clean? * Ultimate Challenge - Justify highly radioactive radionuclides have been removed to the maximum extent practical? 2 removed to the maximum extent practical? - Building compelling regulatory documentation that will withstand intense scrutiny §3116 Requirements 1. Does not require disposal in deep geological repository 2. Highly radioactive radionuclides removed to the maximum extent practical 3. Meet the performance objectives in 10 CFR Part 3 3. Meet the performance objectives in 10 CFR Part 61, Subpart C 4. Waste disposed pursuant to a State-approved closure plan or permit Note: If it is anticipated that Class C disposal limits will be exceeded, additional

471

Draft Environmental Assessment for Proposed Rule, 10 CFR Part 433, Energy Conservation and Fossil Fuel-Generated Energy Consumption Reduction Standards for the Design and Construction of New Federal Commercial and Multi-Family High-Rise Residential BuildingsŽ  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Draft Environmental Assessment for Proposed Rule, 10 CFR Part 433, Draft Environmental Assessment for Proposed Rule, 10 CFR Part 433, "Energy Conservation and Fossil Fuel-Generated Energy Consumption Reduction Standards for the Design and Construction of New Federal Commercial and Multi-Family High-Rise Residential Buildings" and 10 CFR Part 435 "Energy Conservation and Fossil Fuel-Generated Energy Consumption Reduction Standards for the Design and Construction of New Federal Low-Rise Residential Buildings" (DOE/EA-1778) 2 SUMMARY The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared this Environmental Assessment (EA) for DOE's Proposed Rule, 10 CFR Part 433, "Energy Conservation and Fossil Fuel-Generated Energy Consumption Reduction Standards for the Design and Construction of New Federal Commercial and Multi-Family High-Rise Residential

472

Draft Environmental Assessment for Proposed Rule, 10 CFR Part 433, Energy Conservation and Fossil Fuel-Generated Energy Consumption Reduction Standards for the Design and Construction of New Federal Commercial and Multi-Family High-Rise Residential BuildingsŽ  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Draft Environmental Assessment for Proposed Rule, 10 CFR Part 433, Draft Environmental Assessment for Proposed Rule, 10 CFR Part 433, "Energy Conservation and Fossil Fuel-Generated Energy Consumption Reduction Standards for the Design and Construction of New Federal Commercial and Multi-Family High-Rise Residential Buildings" and 10 CFR Part 435 "Energy Conservation and Fossil Fuel-Generated Energy Consumption Reduction Standards for the Design and Construction of New Federal Low-Rise Residential Buildings" (DOE/EA-1778) 2 SUMMARY The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared this Environmental Assessment (EA) for DOE's Proposed Rule, 10 CFR Part 433, "Energy Conservation and Fossil Fuel-Generated Energy Consumption Reduction Standards for the Design and Construction of New Federal Commercial and Multi-Family High-Rise Residential

473

Governor of (City), (State)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

), radon emissions from DOE facilities (Subpart Q), radon emissions from phosphogypsum stacks (Subpart R

474

March 13-15, 2012 14th Annual Joint DOE/EFCOG Chemical Safety and Worker Safety and Health Program (10 CFR 851) Workshop - Agenda  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

/2/12 Page 4 of 11 /2/12 Page 4 of 11 Day 3 - Thursday, March 15, 2012 FORRESTAL MAIN AUDITORIUM (GE-086) 10 CFR 851 Workshop The purpose of this workshop is to foster continuous improvement of the implementation of 10 CFR 851 by sharing implementation experiences and ideas for enhancements gathered over the nearly 5 years since the rule's date for full implementation. 8:00 - 10:00 Registration/Name Tags - Large Auditorium (GE-086) 9:15 - 9:25 Welcome to 10 CFR 851 Workshop Pat Worthington Director, DOE Office of Health and Safety 9:25 - 9 :35 Introduction to HSS Focus Group Bill Eckroade

475

10 CFR Part 830, Nuclear Safety Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10 10 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 10, 2001 / Rules and Regulations issued August 5, 1998, are adopted as a final rule with the following change: PART 1446-PEANUTS 1. The authority citation for part 7 CFR part 1446 continues to read as follows: Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7271; 15 U.S.C. 714b and 714c. 2. Paragraph (c) of § 1446.102 is amended by adding a new sentence to the end of the paragraph to read as follows: § 1446.102 Administration. * * * * * (c) Supervisory authority. * * * Further, the Director of TPD, FSA, may authorize the wavier or modification of deadlines and other requirements, except statutory deadlines or requirements, in cases where lateness or the failure to meet such other requirements does not adversely affect operation of the program. 3. Paragraph (3) of the definition of

476

DOE/EA-1643: Finding of No Significant Impact for 10 CFR Part 431 Commerical Refrigeration Equipment (12/31/08)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FOR 10 CFR Part 431 Energy Conservation Program for Commercial and Industrial Equipment: Energy Conservation Standards for Commercial Ice-Cream Freezers; Self-Contained Commercial Refrigerators, Commercial Freezers, and Commercial Refrigerator- Freezers without Doors; and Remote Condensing Commercial Refrigerators, Commercial Freezers, and Commercial Refrigerator-Freezers December 31, 2008 [6450-01-P] DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Part 431 [Docket Number: EERE-2006-STD-OI26] RIN 1904-AB59 Energy Conservation Program for Commercial and Industrial Equipment: Energy Conservation Standards for Commercial Ice-Cream Freezers; Self-Contained Commercial Refrigerators, Commercial Freezers, and Commercial Refrigerator- . Freezers without

477

Clean Slate Environmental Remediation DSA for 10 CFR 830 Compliance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Clean Slate Sites II and III are scheduled for environmental remediation (ER) to remove elevated levels of radionuclides in soil. These sites are contaminated with legacy remains of non-nuclear yield nuclear weapons experiments at the Nevada Test Site, that involved high explosive, fissile, and related materials. The sites may also hold unexploded ordnance (UXO) from military training activities in the area over the intervening years. Regulation 10 CFR 830 (Ref. 1) identifies DOE-STD-1120-98 (Ref. 2) and 29 CFR 1910.120 (Ref. 3) as the safe harbor methodologies for performing these remediation operations. Of these methodologies, DOE-STD-1120-98 has been superseded by DOE-STD-1120-2005 (Ref. 4). The project adopted DOE-STD-1120-2005, which includes an approach for ER projects, in combination with 29 CFR 1910.120, as the basis documents for preparing the documented safety analysis (DSA). To securely implement the safe harbor methodologies, we applied DOE-STD-1027-92 (Ref. 5) and DOE-STD-3009-94 (Ref. 6), as needed, to develop a robust hazard classification and hazards analysis that addresses non-standard hazards such as radionuclides and UXO. The hazard analyses provided the basis for identifying Technical Safety Requirements (TSR) level controls. The DOE-STD-1186-2004 (Ref. 7) methodology showed that some controls warranted elevation to Specific Administrative Control (SAC) status. In addition to the Evaluation Guideline (EG) of DOE-STD-3009-94, we also applied the DOE G 420.1 (Ref. 8) annual, radiological dose, siting criterion to define a controlled area around the operation to protect the maximally exposed offsite individual (MOI).

James L. Traynor, Stephen L. Nicolosi, Michael L. Space, Louis F. Restrepo

2006-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

478

November 5, 2008, DOE HSS Memorandum on 10 CFR Part 85 1, Worker Safety and Health  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5,2008 5,2008 MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION A FROM: URITY OFFICER SECURITY SUBJECT: 10 C.F. ' d.Part 85 1, "Worker Safety and Health" The attached letter regarding 10 C.F.R. Part 85 1, "Worker Safety and Health" was sent to contract management for Department of Energy facilities (listed in attachment 2) in order to reemphasize the importance of the rule. The Office of Health, Safety and Security will be working with your organizations to ensure that effective implementation and support are provided to increase worker awareness of their rights and responsibilities with regards to 10 C.F.R. 85 1. If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 903-3777 or your stafTmay contact Bill McArthur, Director, Office of Worker Safety and Health Policy, at

479

29 C.F.R. Part 24: Procedures for the Handling of Retaliation Complaints  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Part 24: Procedures for the Handling of Retaliation Part 24: Procedures for the Handling of Retaliation Complaints under Federal Employee Protection Statutes 29 C.F.R. Part 24: Procedures for the Handling of Retaliation Complaints under Federal Employee Protection Statutes Stakeholders: DOE Employees and Employees of DOE Contractors Scope: 29 C.F.R. Part 24 implements procedures under the employee protection provisions for which the Secretary of Labor has been given responsibility pursuant to the following federal statutes: Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. 300j-9(i); Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. 1367; Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. 2622; Solid Waste Disposal Act, 42 U.S.C. 6971; Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7622; Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, 42 U.S.C. 5851; and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

480

Enforcement of 10 CFR Part 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule) fo  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 1, 1999 July 1, 1999 MEMORANDUM FOR DOE PAAA COORDINATORS CONTRACTOR PAAA COORDINATORS FROM: R. KEITH CHRISTOPHER DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND INVESTIGATION SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 99-01: Enforcement of 10 CFR Part 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule) for Facilities Below Hazard Category III Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedures for Enforcement, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity for the Office of Enforcement and Investigation (EH Enforcement) periodically to issue clarifying guidance regarding the processes used in its enforcement activities. During the past 18 months, EH Enforcement has identified a number of examples in which both DOE and contractor organizations have incorrectly exempted activities from applicability of the DOE Quality Assurance Rule 10 CFR 830.120 (QA Rule). The

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "helium-48 cfr subpart" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.