Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "hearing officer decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Military Personnel Claim  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Military Personnel Claim Military Personnel Claim Decisions - 2010 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Military Personnel Claim Decisions - 2010 Dataset Summary Description decisions involve claims related to uniformed service members' pay, allowances, travel, transportation, retired pay, and survivor benefits Tags {"military personnel","government claims",pay,"military benefits","uniformed services",overpayment} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated V33 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4475

2

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions-Transportation and  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Transportation and Transportation and Contractual Claim Decisions 1997 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions-Transportation and Contractual Claim Decisions 1997 Dataset Summary Description decisions involve a carrier's dispute over whether it is liable for transit loss or damage. They also include all kinds of quasi-contractual disputes which are settled under Section 3702 of title 31 of the United States Code. Tags {military,contractors,claims,transportation,damage} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated V35 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil

3

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions-Transportation and  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 6 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions-Transportation and Contractual Claim Decisions 1996 Dataset Summary Description decisions involve a carrier's dispute over whether it is liable for transit loss or damage. They also include all kinds of quasi-contractual disputes which are settled under Section 3702 of title 31 of the United States Code. Tags {military,contractors,claims,transportation,damage} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated V34 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4476 Public Access Level public

4

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions-Transportation and  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 9 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions-Transportation and Contractual Claim Decisions 1999 Dataset Summary Description decisions involve a carrier's dispute over whether it is liable for transit loss or damage. They also include all kinds of quasi-contractual disputes which are settled under Section 3702 of title 31 of the United States Code. Tags {military,contractors,claims,transportation,damage} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated V37 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4479 Public Access Level public

5

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions-Transportation and  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 8 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions-Transportation and Contractual Claim Decisions 1998 Dataset Summary Description decisions involve a carrier's dispute over whether it is liable for transit loss or damage. They also include all kinds of quasi-contractual disputes which are settled under Section 3702 of title 31 of the United States Code. Tags {military,contractors,claims,transportation,damage} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated V36 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4478 Public Access Level public

6

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Military Personnel Claim  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 6 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Military Personnel Claim Decisions - 2006 Dataset Summary Description decisions involve claims related to uniformed service members' pay, allowances, travel, transportation, retired pay, and survivor benefits Tags {"military personnel","government claims",pay,"military benefits","uniformed services",overpayment} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/29/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4471 Public Access Level public

7

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Military Personnel Claim  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 9 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Military Personnel Claim Decisions - 2009 Dataset Summary Description decisions involve claims related to uniformed service members' pay, allowances, travel, transportation, retired pay, and survivor benefits Tags {"military personnel","government claims",pay,"military benefits","uniformed services",overpayment} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated V32 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4474 Public Access Level public

8

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

10 10 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security Clearance Decisions-2010 Dataset Summary Description adjudication of security clearance cases for contractor personnel Tags {"security clearance","national security","defense industry","defense contractor"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/17/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4459 Public Access Level public Data Dictionary http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/ Data Download URL http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/2010

9

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 2 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security Clearance Decisions-2002 Dataset Summary Description adjudication of security clearance cases for contractor personnel Tags {"security clearance","national security","defense industry","defense contractor"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/09/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4451 Public Access Level public Data Dictionary http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/ Data Download URL http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/2002

10

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 6 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security Clearance Decisions-2006 Dataset Summary Description adjudication of security clearance cases for contractor personnel Tags {"security clearance","national security","defense industry","defense contractor"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/13/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4455 Public Access Level public Data Dictionary http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/ Data Download URL http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/2006

11

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 3 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security Clearance Decisions-2003 Dataset Summary Description adjudication of security clearance cases for contractor personnel Tags {"security clearance","national security","defense industry","defense contractor"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/10/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4452 Public Access Level public Data Dictionary http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/ Data Download URL http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/2003

12

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 8 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security Clearance Decisions-2008 Dataset Summary Description adjudication of security clearance cases for contractor personnel Tags {"security clearance","national security","defense industry","defense contractor"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/15/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4457 Public Access Level public Data Dictionary http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/ Data Download URL http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/2008

13

Office of Hearings and Appeals | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages

Hearings and Appeals Hearings and Appeals Search Search form Search Office of Hearings and Appeals Office of Hearings and Appeals Services Services Home Applications for Exceptions Conflict Prevention and Resolution Conflict Prevention and Resolution Home Contract Disputes Environmental Conflict Resolution Field Office Programs HQ Mediation Program Ombuds Program OCPR Forms Appeals Hearings Application for Refund Information Center Information Center Home Annual Reports Decision Summaries Filing Information Mission About Us Offices Office of Hearings and Appeals Office of Hearings and Appeals Leadership Poli A. Marmolejos Director Office of Hearings and Appeals Read Bio ‣ Fred L. Brown Deputy Director of Office of Hearings & Appeals Read Bio ‣ Janet N. Freimuth Chief of the Employee Protection and Exceptions Division

14

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Supplemental Order  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4, 1997 4, 1997 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Supplemental Order Name of Case:C. Lawrence Cornett Date of Filing:February 3, 1997 Case Number: VWX-0010 This Decision supplements an Initial Agency Decision, dated December 19, 1996, issued by the undersigned Hearing Officer of the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy in a case involving a "whistleblower" complaint. The complaint was filed by C. Lawrence Cornett (Cornett) under the Department of Energy's Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. See C. Lawrence Cornett, 26 DOE ¶ 87,507 (1996) (Cornett). (1) In Cornett, I found that Maria Elena Torano Associates, Inc. (META), a DOE contractor, had violated the provisions of 10 C.F.R. § 708.5 by

15

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 24, 2007, the Acting Director of the Office of August 24, 2007, the Acting Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals authorized me to render a decision on Burnette's complaint. August 30, 2007 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Case: Jeffrey R. Burnette Date of Filing: August 23, 2007 Case Number: TBU-0071 Jeffrey R. Burnette (Burnette or the complainant), appeals the dismissal of his complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. The complaint was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction under Section 708.17. As explained below, the dismissal of the complaint should be sustained, and the appeal denied. 1 I. Background This complainant's Part 708 history dates from 2001. A brief

16

Decision Summaries  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

oha/decision-summaries Office of Hearings and Appeals oha/decision-summaries Office of Hearings and Appeals 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC, 20585 202-287-1566 en Summary of Decisions - December 30, 2013 - January 3, 2014 http://energy.gov/oha/articles/summary-decisions-december-30-2013-january-3-2014 decisions-december-30-2013-january-3-2014" class="title-link">Summary of Decisions - December 30, 2013 - January 3, 2014

17

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3, 2007 3, 2007 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Case: Delbert F. Bunch Date of Filing: May 7, 2007 Case Number: TBU-0068 Delbert F. Bunch (Bunch or the complainant), appeals the dismissal of his complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. The complaint was dated September 6, 2006. As explained below, the dismissal of the complaint should be sustained, and the appeal denied. I. Background The complainant was an employee with Bechtel SAIC Company LLP (BSC), the prime contractor to the DOE Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCWRM) Yucca Mountain Project. The DOE OCRWM has been tasked to develop and manage a safe system to dispose of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. In

18

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3, 2007 3, 2007 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Case: Fredrick Abbott Date of Filing: February 21, 2007 Case Number: TBU-0062 Fredrick Abbott (the complainant or Abbott), appeals the dismissal of his complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. As explained below, I have determined that the dismissal of the complaint should be sustained and the appeal denied. I. Background The complainant is an employee with Washington Savannah River Company (WSRC), which operates the DOE's Savannah River site located in Aiken, South Carolina. Pursuant to Part 708, on April 13, 2006, he filed a complaint of retaliation against WSRC with the DOE's Savannah River Operations Office. In his complaint,

19

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

According to SNL, the 30 minute estimation period is the According to SNL, the 30 minute estimation period is the standard practice for this work group. 2/ The complainant later made the correction as directed and returned to work. December 19, 2006 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Case: Donald R. Rhodes Date of Filing: December 8, 2006 Case Number: TBU-0058 Donald R. Rhodes (Rhodes or the complainant) appeals the dismissal of his August 25, 2006 complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. He filed the complaint with the Whistleblower Program Manager (WP Manager) of the DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration Service Center (NNSA/SC), located in Albuquerque, New Mexico. As explained below, the WP Manager's November 16, 2006

20

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0, 2007 0, 2007 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Case: Charles Montano Date of Filing: April 27, 2007 Case Number: TBU-0067 Charles Montano (the complainant), appeals the dismissal of his complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. The complaint was dated January 30, 2007. As explained below, the dismissal of the complaint should be sustained, and the appeal denied. I. Background The complainant, an auditor, has been an employee of the DOE's Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in Los Alamos, New Mexico since 1978. Until June 2006, the University of California (UC) held the management and operations (M&O) contract to run LANL for the DOE. On June 1, 2006, Los Alamos National Security (LANS) LLC assumed

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "hearing officer decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 29, 2006 November 29, 2006 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Case: William Cor Date of Filing: April 21, 2006 Case Number: TBU-0045 William Cor (the complainant or the employee), appeals the dismissal of his complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. As explained below, the dismissal of the complaint should be reversed and the matter remanded for further processing to the Whistleblower Program Manager at the National Nuclear Security Administration Service Center (NNSA). I. Background The complainant was an employee with ARES Corporation, a DOE contractor at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in Los Alamos, New Mexico. Pursuant to Part 708, he filed a complaint of retaliation

22

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 22, 2007 March 22, 2007 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Case: Misti Wall Date of Filing: February 15, 2007 Case Number: TBU-0061 Misti Wall (the complainant or Wall), appeals the dismissal of her complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. As explained below, the dismissal of the complaint should be reversed and the matter remanded for further processing to the Whistleblower Program Manager (Manager) at the National Nuclear Security Administration Service Center (NNSA). I. Background The complainant was an employee with Sandia Corporation (Sandia), a DOE contractor that runs Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), located in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Pursuant to Part 708, she

23

Evidence-based Decision Making: Influences on Central-Office Administrators' Decision-Making Practices  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

through rigorous, scientifically-based research. This mandate required central office administrators who managed federal budgets to make evidence-based decisions when purchasing interventions and programs with federal funds. In this study, central office...

Haecker, Bonnie Minnia

2013-12-05T23:59:59.000Z

24

Office of Science Approves Critical Decision 1 for APS Upgrade...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 2000 Subscribe to APS News rss feed Office of Science Approves Critical Decision 1 for APS Upgrade Project SEPTEMBER 15, 2011...

25

PSH-13-0053- In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On July 15, 2013, a Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which he determined that an individual should not have an access authorization granted to him. In reaching this determination, the Hearing...

26

The Test Ban Hearings: Congress Presses for Kennedy's Decision  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...must sat-isfy building specifications set up by the Office...which it ran at full power for three consecu-tive...recently com-pleted 1-thermal-megawatt pool-type...reactor of 2000-kilowatt power, built near Cairo with...DNA content with higher plant toler-ance to chronic...

1961-08-04T23:59:59.000Z

27

The Test Ban Hearings: Congress Presses for Kennedy's Decision  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...temperature in the Redstone rocket, in which insulation is limited because of weight. A slight...the shelters must sat-isfy building specifications set up by the Office of Civilian Defense...pay for the recently com-pleted 1-thermal-megawatt pool-type research reactor...

1961-08-04T23:59:59.000Z

28

Security Hearing FAQs | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Services » Hearings » Security Hearing FAQs Services » Hearings » Security Hearing FAQs Security Hearing FAQs (1) What is the purpose of the hearing? The purpose of the hearing is to provide you with an opportunity to respond to the DOE's questions concerning your eligibility to hold a security clearance ("security concerns"), as outlined in the Statement of Charges attached to the Notification Letter. During the hearing, you will be able to present evidence to explain, refute or mitigate the derogatory information cited in the Statement of Charges. After the hearing, the Hearing Officer will review the testimonial and documentary evidence in the record, and issue a Decision which contains findings of fact and a determination whether or not to grant or restore your security clearance.

29

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

granted. I. Background The complainant is the Manager of the Employee Concerns and Ethics Office of the Battelle Energy Alliance (BEA). BEA manages the DOE's Idaho National...

30

PSH-13-0052 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0052 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 9, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should be restored. A DOE Psychiatrist had found that the individual suffered from alcohol abuse. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual mitigated these security concerns at the hearing by presenting evidence that he had more than fully complied with the DOE Psychiatrist's treatment recommendations and the treatment has been effective. Steven Fine - Hearing Officer PSH-13-0052.pdf More Documents & Publications PSH-13-0083 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0014 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing

31

PSH-12-0068 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-0068 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2-0068 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0068 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On September 24, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be restored. The Individual had a history of four arrests, one of which was alcohol-related. A DOE Psychologist diagnosed the individual with Alcohol-Related Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not mitigated any of these security concerns at the hearing. OHA Case No. PSH-12-0068 Steven L. Fine - Hearing Officer PSH-12-0068.pdf More Documents & Publications PSH-12-0129 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0131 - In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing

32

PSH-12-0068 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0068 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On September 24, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be restored. The Individual had a history of four arrests, one of which was alcohol-related. A DOE Psychologist diagnosed the individual with Alcohol-Related Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not mitigated any of these security concerns at the hearing. OHA Case No. PSH-12-0068 Steven L. Fine - Hearing Officer PSH-12-0068.pdf More Documents & Publications PSH-12-0129 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0035 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing

33

PSH-13-0062 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0062 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On August 16, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she concluded that the DOE should not restore an individual's suspended DOE access authorization. A DOE Operations Office referred the individual, an applicant for DOE access authorization, to administrative review under 10 C.F.R. Part 710, issues pertaining to the individual's use of alcohol, including the individual's two past arrests for Driving While Intoxicated as well as his diagnosis of alcohol dependence by a DOE consultant-psychologist. The individual requested a hearing before an OHA Hearing Officer. Following the hearing, the Hearing Officer determined that the individual had presented sufficient evidence to mitigate the

34

PSH-12-0110 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

10 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 10 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0110 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 16, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she concluded that an individual should be granted DOE access authorization. A DOE Operations Office referred an applicant for a security clearance to administrative review under 10 C.F.R. Part 710, citing as security concerns issues pertaining to the individual's use of alcohol, including the opinion of a DOE consultant-psychiatrist that the individual was a user of alcohol habitually to excess. The individual requested a hearing before an OHA Hearing Officer. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer determined that

35

PSH-12-0047 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 7 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0047 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On August 24, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she concluded that an individual should be granted DOE access authorization. A DOE Operations Office referred an applicant for a security clearance to administrative review under 10 C.F.R. Part 710, citing as security concerns issues pertaining to the individual's use of alcohol, including the opinion of a DOE consultant-psychiatrist that the individual was a user of alcohol habitually to excess, as well as the individual's past arrests. The individual requested a hearing before an OHA Hearing Officer. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer determined that the individual mitigated the

36

PSH-12-0033 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

33 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 33 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0033 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On June 27, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be restored. The Individual had a history of nine arrests, seven of which were alcohol-related. In addition, the Individual had provided inaccurate and incomplete information to security officials during his background investigation. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual's credibility was suspect and therefore concluded that the Individual had not mitigated any of these security concerns at the hearing. Steven L. Fine - Hearing Officer PSH-12-0033.pdf More Documents & Publications PSH-13-0071 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing

37

PSH-12-0076 - Personnel Security Hearing | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 - Personnel Security Hearing 6 - Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0076 - Personnel Security Hearing On October 26, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be granted . A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about the individual's falsification and financial irresponsibility. His behavior raised security concerns under Criteria F and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, she found that the requisite element of "deliberateness" was met under Criterion F. She further found that

38

Abstract B27: Influence of fluorescence visualization on screening decisions in the general dental office  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...meeting-abstract Behavioral and Social Science Screening and Early Detection...decisions in the general dental office Denise M. Laronde 1 P Michele...screening within the dental office could lead to earlier diagnosis...tools within the general dental office amongst clinicians who are...

Denise M. Laronde; P Michele Williams; Samson Ng; Catherine F. Poh; T Greg Hislop; Lewei Zhang; and Miriam P. Rosin

2011-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

39

PSH-12-0125- In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On March 18, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individuals DOE access authorization should not be restored. The Individual had a history of three...

40

PSH-12-0132- In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On March 4, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should not restore an individuals access authorization. As security concerns under 10 CFR Part 710,...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "hearing officer decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

PSH-13-0101- In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On February 12, 2014, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individuals authorization access should be granted. Prior to commencing work for a DOE contractor, the...

42

Deputy Secretary Decision Affirming LWA-0005 Decision and Order  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FRANCIS M. O'LAUGHLIN, Complainant FRANCIS M. O'LAUGHLIN, Complainant v. BOEING PETROLEUM SERVICES, INC., Respondent. OHA Case No.LWA-0005 FINAL DECISION AND ORDER This is an appeal by complainant Francis O'Laughlin of the Initial Agency Decision by an Office of Hearings and Appeals ("OHA") Hearing Officer who found, following two days of hearings, that the complainant had not satisfied his burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that he made protected safety disclosures to respondent Boeing Petroleum Services, Inc., a contractor of the Department of Energy's Strategic Petroleum Reserve, as required by 10 C.F.R. Part 708. On appeal, the complainant challenges the Hearing Officer's finding that he had not met his burden of showing that he had made

43

P:\DECISION\1104.tso.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

from from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. § 552. Such material has been deleted from this copy and replaced with XXXXXX's. United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: September 1, 2011 ) Case No.: TSO-1104 ) ____________________________________) Issued: December 1, 2011 ______________ Decision and Order _______________ Robert B. Palmer, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") for access authorization under the regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, entitled "Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special

44

P:\DECISION\1009.tso.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 9, 2011 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Hearing Officer's Decision Name of Case: Personnel Security Hearing Date of Filing: February 15, 2011 Case Number: TSO-1009 This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1/ under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations, I have determined that the individual's access authorization should not be restored.

45

PSH-12-0131 - In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 - In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing 1 - In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0131 - In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing On March 5, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should be restored. The Individual had a history of two alcohol-related arrests and an alcohol-related incident at work. A DOE Psychologist found that the individual habitually used alcohol to excess. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual these security concerns at the hearing by presenting evidence that he had more than fully complied with the DOE Psychologist's treatment recommendations and the compelling testimony of his treating counselor. Steven Fine - Hearing Officer PSH-12-0131.pdf More Documents & Publications

46

PSH-13-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 0 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 23, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she concluded that the DOE should not restore an individual's suspended DOE access authorization. A DOE Operations Office referred the individual administrative review under 10 C.F.R. Part 710, citing as security concerns issues pertaining to the individual's use of alcohol, including his April 2012 arrest for Driving Under the Influence (DUI) of Alcohol, as well as opinion of a DOE consultant-psychiatrist that the individual met the criteria for alcohol abuse disorder and was a user of alcohol habitually to excess. The individual requested a hearing before an OHA Hearing Officer. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the

47

PSH-12-0045 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0045 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On August 22, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an Individual's DOE security clearance should be restored. The Individual had been caught viewing pornography on a DOE workplace computer. The Individual was examined by a DOE Consultant Psychologist who diagnosed the Individual with an Impulse-Control Disorder NOS. The Individual was, however, able to show that, as a result of therapy, his Impulse-Control Disorder is in remission with a low to low-moderate chance of relapse. For these reasons, the Hearing Officer concluded that the Individual had mitigated the security concerns at the hearing. Steven L. Fine - Hearing Officer

48

PSH-13-0018 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0018 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On May 23, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be granted. The Individual had a history of six arrests, five of which were alcohol-related and two of which were marijuana-related. In addition, A DOE Psychologist diagnosed the individual with Alcohol Dependence. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not mitigated any the security concerns raised by his alcohol abuse and history of criminal conduct at the hearing, because he was only in the early stages of his recovery from his alcohol dependence, and his alcohol dependence was a contributing factor to much of his criminal conduct. The Hearing Officer

49

PSH-13-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PSH-13-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 23, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she concluded that the DOE should not restore an individual's suspended DOE access authorization. A DOE Operations Office referred the individual administrative review under 10 C.F.R. Part 710, citing as security concerns issues pertaining to the individual's use of alcohol, including his April 2012 arrest for Driving Under the Influence (DUI) of Alcohol, as well as opinion of a DOE consultant-psychiatrist that the individual met the criteria for alcohol abuse disorder and was a user of alcohol habitually to excess. The individual requested a hearing before an OHA Hearing Officer. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the

50

PSH-12-0092 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0092 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On September 24, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be restored. The Individual had a history of five arrests, two of which were alcohol-related. The Individual's pattern of criminal activity included a sex offense against a minor, for which he was incarcerated for a period of over one year. In addition, A DOE Psychologist diagnosed the individual with Alcohol Dependence. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not mitigated any of these security concerns at the hearing. Steven Fine - Hearing Officer PSH-12-0092.pdf More Documents & Publications

51

PSH-13-0074 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0074 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing Personnel Security Hearing (PSH-13-0074). On September 19, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should restore an individual's access authorization. As a security concern under 10 C.F.R. Part 710, a Local Security Office cited the report of the DOE psychologist, in which he concluded that the individual met criteria found in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV-TR (DSM-IV-TR) for Opioid Dependence, and that this condition causes, or may cause, a significant defect in judgment and reliability. In accord with the hearing testimony of the DOE psychologist, the Hearing Officer found that there was a low risk that the individual's condition would, in

52

P:\DECISION\psh-11-0029.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

the case the case number of the decision in the search engine located at http://www.oha.doe.gov/search.htm. * The original of this document contains information which is subject to withholding from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. § 552. Such material has been deleted from this copy and replaced with XXXXXX's. United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: November 30, 2011 ) Case No.: PSH-11-0029 ) ____________________________________) Issued: March 21, 2012 ______________ Decision and Order _______________ Robert B. Palmer, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the

53

P:\DECISION\psh-13-0002.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

the case the case number of the decision in the search engine located at http://www.oha.doe.gov/search.htm. The original of this document contains information which is subject to withholding from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. § 552. Such material has been deleted from this copy and replaced with XXXXXX's. United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: January 9, 2013 ) Case No.: PSH-13-0002 ) ____________________________________) Issued: March 8, 2013 ______________ Decision and Order _______________ Robert B. Palmer, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual")

54

PSH-12-0088 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-0088 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2-0088 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0088 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 15, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she determined that an Individual's access authorization should be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the Individual had resolved the security concerns arising from his alcohol use. The Individual was diagnosed by a DOE psychologist with Alcohol-Related Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified. In addition, the Individual had five alcohol-related incidents in his past, including a positive Breath Alchol Test (BAT) in March 2012. The hearing officer found that the Local Security Office (LSO) properly raised security concerns under Criteria H, J, and L.

55

Summary of Decisions - December 10, 2012 - December 14, 2012 | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary of Decisions - December 10, 2012 - December 14, 2012 Summary of Decisions - December 10, 2012 - December 14, 2012 Summary of Decisions - December 10, 2012 - December 14, 2012 December 14, 2012 - 2:29pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On December 13, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be granted. A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about the individual's alcohol use. A DOE psychiatrist examined the individual and concluded that the individual suffers from Alcohol Dependence. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to

56

PSH-11-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On March 12, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she determined that an Individual=s access authorization should not be granted. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not resolved the security concerns arising from his illegal drug use, alcohol use, and misrepresentations made during the process regarding his eligibility for access authorization. At the hearing, the Individual did not present any evidence to rebut any of the allegations. He did testify that he stopped drinking alcohol in June or July of 2011, approximately six months prior to the hearing. The DOE psychologist, who diagnosed him as alcohol dependent, testified that this was an insufficient

57

PSH-12-0100 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

100 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 100 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0100 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 15, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not restore an individual's access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) raised certain concerns regarding the individual's use of alcohol, citing a recent arrest for Aggravated Driving Under the Influence (DUI) and a diagnosis by a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE Psychologist) that the individual suffered from Alcohol Dependence. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to mitigate these security concerns. The individual had abstained from the use of alcohol in the

58

PSH-12-0077 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

77 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 77 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0077 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 25, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not grant an individual an access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) raised certain concerns regarding (1) diagnoses by a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE Psychologist) that the individual suffered from Alcohol Dependence and Personality Disorder NOS; (2) the individual's history of problematic alcohol use; (3) prior criminal conduct of the individual; (4) evidence of the individual's financial irresponsibility; and (5) inconsistent information provided to DOE during the security clearance process. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer

59

PSH-12-0101 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

01 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 01 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0101 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 21, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about the individual's financial irresponsibility. His behavior raised security concerns under Criterion L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, she found that it was too early to determine whether the individual had demonstrated a sustained pattern of financial responsibility for a

60

PSH-13-0083 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0083 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 21, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be restored. The Record showed that the individual had a history of three alcohol-related arrests. A DOE Psychologist also diagnosed the individual with Alcohol-Abuse. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not shown that he was reformed or rehabilitated from his Alcohol-Abuse. Nor had the individual mitigated the security concerns raised by his criminal activity since that activity was symptomatic of his Alcohol Abuse. Steven Fine - Hearing Officer PSH-13-0083.pdf More Documents & Publications

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "hearing officer decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

PSH-12-0104 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

104 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 104 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0104 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On December 13, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be granted. A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about the individual's alcohol use. A DOE psychiatrist examined the individual and concluded that the individual suffers from Alcohol Dependence. His behavior raised security concerns under Criteria H and J. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, she found that the individual had

62

PSH-12-0134 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PSH-12-0134 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0134 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0134 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On April 2, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance because the individual demonstrated financial irresponsibility through his two bankruptcies within ten years, his current debts, and his inability or unwillingness to live within his means. His behavior raised security concerns under Criterion L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security

63

PSH-12-0059 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

59 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 59 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0059 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On September 13, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be granted. The Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address concerns about the individual's falsifications and financial irresponsibility. The individual's behavior raised concerns under Criteria F and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to mitigate these security concerns. Specifically, she found that despite the individual's acknowledgment of his financially

64

PSH-12-0133 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

33 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 33 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0133 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On March 5, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be granted. A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about his misrepresentations and misuse of information technology. The individual's behavior raised security concerns under Criteria F and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual presented sufficient evidence to resolve the security concerns associated with his misuse of information technology. However, she found that the individual had not sufficiently mitigated the

65

PSH-12-0073 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

73 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 73 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0073 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 8, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. A Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about the individual's alcohol use. A DOE consultant psychologist found that the individual suffers from Alcohol Dependence, in early full remission. His behavior raised security concerns under Criteria H, J and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual demonstrated adequate evidence of rehabilitation and thus mitigated the security concerns under Criteria H and J. She

66

PSH-13-0044 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0044 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 26 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. In November and December 2012, as part of a background investigation, the local security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address concerns about the individual's pattern of criminal conduct. The individual's behavior raised security concerns under Criterion L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to mitigate the security concerns associated with his three charges of Driving

67

PSH-13-0009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

09 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 09 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On May 1, 2013, a Hearing Officer determined that an individual should be granted a security clearance. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had successfully addressed the DOE's security concerns regarding foreign influence and foreign preference, and specifically regarding his multiple citizenships and foreign passports. The Hearing Officer based his decision on the individual's expressed willingness to renounce his foreign citizenships and refrain from using his foreign passports, the routine nature of his foreign holdings, the fact that the other countries of which the individual is a citizen have friendly

68

PSH-12-0081 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PSH-12-0081 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0081 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0081 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 11, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance for providing false information on a Questionnaire for National Security Positions and failing to comply with rules regarding the handling of classified information and conduct within simited access areas. This behavior raised security concerns under Criteria F, G, and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, he

69

PSH-12-0134 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0134 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On April 2, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance because the individual demonstrated financial irresponsibility through his two bankruptcies within ten years, his current debts, and his inability or unwillingness to live within his means. His behavior raised security concerns under Criterion L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security

70

PSH-12-0120 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PSH-12-0120 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0120 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0120 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On February 4, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about falsification and drug use. The individual's behavior raised security concerns under Criteria F, K and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, with respect to the individual's omissions on security forms, she found that the requisite element of "deliberateness" was

71

PSH-13-0069 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 9 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0069 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 11, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. In April 2013, as part of a background investigation, the local security office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address concerns about his positive drug test. The individual's behavior raised security concerns under the Bond Amendment and Criteria K and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer concluded the individual's use of his wife's prescription medication happened under unusual circumstances that are unlikely to recur in the future, and to the

72

PSH-13-0003 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0003 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On May 1, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should restore an individual's access authorization. As security concerns under Criteria J and L of 10 CFR Part 710, a Local Security Office (LSO) cited a DOE Psychiatrist's diagnosis of Alcohol Dependence, a history of heavy alcohol drinking, and three alcohol-related arrests and one arrest for possession of cocaine. The Hearing Officer found that the individual had resolved the concerns related to his alcohol use as a result of his voluntary treatment following a 2012 relapse after nine years of sobriety. Mental health professionals' opinions at the hearing, as well as evidence of internal motivation and a

73

PSH-12-0052 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

52 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 52 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0052 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 2, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not grant an individual an access authorization. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance because of concerns regarding the individual's use of alcohol and prior criminal activity. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to mitigate these security concerns. Specifically, he cited the fact that the individual had only recently begun receiving counseling with regard to his use of alcohol and had consumed alcohol as recently as four days prior to

74

PSH-12-0048 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

48 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 48 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0048 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On August 17, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance because the individual drank to intoxication once a week and had been diagnosed as suffering from Alcohol Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified, which raised security concerns under Criteria H and J. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, he found that the individual's continued use of alcohol, in particular, his consumption

75

PSH-13-0064 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing 4 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0064 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 11, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not restore an individual's access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) cited concerns raised by the individual's use of alcohol habitually to excess and an opinion of a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE psychologist) that the individual's lack of maturity leaves significant questions as to his judgment and reliability. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer did not find that the individual had an "illness or mental condition" that would raise a concern under the DOE regulations, but concluded that the individual had

76

PSH-12-0074 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0074 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 1, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about the individual's financial irresponsibility. His behavior raised security concerns under Criterion L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, she found that the individual's recent efforts to resolve his debt have not yet withstood the test of time. Given the

77

PSH-12-0085 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

85 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 85 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0085 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 8, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not grant an individual an access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) raised certain concerns regarding (1) false statements by the individual during the security clearance process; (2) the individual's problematic use of alcohol; (3) his use past use of illegal drugs. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had presented sufficient evidence to mitigate the security concerns raised by his use of illegal drugs, but not those stemming from his false statements and problematic use of alcohol.

78

PSH-12-0122 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PSH-12-0122 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0122 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0122 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On February 15, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about falsification and drug use. The individual's behavior raised security concerns under Criteria F, K and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had presented sufficient evidence to resolve the security concerns associated with his marijuana use while in high school. However, she found that the individual had not sufficiently mitigated the security

79

R:\DECISION\0060.VBX  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) reviewed both decisions, DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) reviewed both decisions, pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) by which NNSA authorized OHA to adjudicate for NNSA whistleblower complaints brought by employees of NNSA contractors under 10 CFR Part 708. Under the MOU, NNSA is responsible for implementing a final decision issued under Part 708. March 28, 2003 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Supplemental Order Name of Petitioner: Robert Burd Date of Filing: March 13, 2003 Case Number: VBX-0060 On November 16, 2001, BWXT Pantex, as successor to Mason & Hanger Corporation (M&H) (collectively referred to as "the contractor"), filed an appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued by an Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) Hearing Officer under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee

80

PSH-12-0079 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

079 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 079 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0079 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 12, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should grant an individual an access authorization. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance because of concerns regarding the individual's prior use of heroin and an opinion of a DOE consultant psychologist that the individual suffered from Opiate Dependence and Learning Disorder Not Otherwise Specified. A Local Security Office cited this information as the basis for security concerns under the Bond Amendment and 10 C.F.R. Part 710. The Hearing Officer found that that the individual resolved the concern related to his use of

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "hearing officer decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

P:\DECISION\psh-12-0031.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

from from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. § 552. Such material has been deleted from this copy and replaced with XXXXXX's. United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: April 5, 2012 ) Case No.: PSH-12-0031 ) ____________________________________) Issued: July 17, 10012 ______________ Decision and Order _______________ Robert B. Palmer, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") for access authorization under the regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, entitled "Criteria and

82

P:\DECISION\psh-12-0090.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

under 5 U.S.C. § 552. Such material has been deleted from this copy and replaced under 5 U.S.C. § 552. Such material has been deleted from this copy and replaced with XXXXXX's. United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: July 11, 2012 ) Case No.: PSH-12-0090 ) ____________________________________) Issued: December 6, 2012 ______________ Decision and Order _______________ Robert B. Palmer, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") for access authorization under the regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, entitled "Criteria and

83

P:\DECISION\psh-12-0019.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

from from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. § 552. Such material has been deleted from this copy and replaced with XXXXXX's. United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: March 7, 2012 ) Case No.: PSH-12-0019 ) ____________________________________) Issued: July 11, 2012 ______________ Decision and Order _______________ Robert B. Palmer, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") for access authorization under the regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, entitled "Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special

84

P:\DECISION\psh-12-0089.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

from disclosure from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. § 552. Such material has been deleted from this copy and replaced with XXXXXX's. United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: July 18, 2012 ) Case No.: PSH-12-0089 ) ____________________________________) Issued: November 16, 2012 ______________ Decision and Order _______________ Robert B. Palmer, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") for access authorization under the regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, entitled "Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special

85

P:\DECISION\psh-12-0082.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

from disclosure from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. § 552. Such material has been deleted from this copy and replaced with XXXXXX's. United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: July 6, 2012 ) Case No.: PSH-12-0082 ) ____________________________________) Issued: October 22, 2012 ______________ Decision and Order _______________ Robert B. Palmer, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") for access authorization under the regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, entitled "Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special

86

LWA-0002 - Affirming Decision and Order - In the Matter of David Ramirez |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Affirming Decision and Order - In the Matter of David Affirming Decision and Order - In the Matter of David Ramirez LWA-0002 - Affirming Decision and Order - In the Matter of David Ramirez This is an appeal by respondent Brookhaven National Laboratory ("BNL"), of the Initial Agency Decision by an Office of Hearings and Appeals Hearing Officer who found, following two days of hearings, that complainant David Ramirez, an electrician formerly employed by a subcontractor of BNL, had established that his safety disclosures were a contributing factor in BNL's decision to lay him off on March 20, 1992. The Hearing Officer further found that BNL failed to satisfy its burden under the DOE regulations of proving "by clear and convincing evidence" that the challenged personnel action would have occurred even absent the claimant's protected activities.

87

LWX-0013 Affirming LWA-0002 Decision and Order  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DAVID RAMIREZ, Complainant DAVID RAMIREZ, Complainant v. BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY, Respondent. OHA Case No.LWA-0002, LWX-0013 FINAL DECISION AND ORDER This is an appeal by respondent Brookhaven National Laboratory ("BNL"), of the Initial Agency Decision by an Office of Hearings and Appeals Hearing Officer who found, following two days of hearings, that complainant David Ramirez, an electrician formerly employed by a subcontractor of BNL, had established that his safety disclosures were a contributing factor in BNL's decision to lay him off on March 20, 1992. The Hearing Officer further found that BNL failed to satisfy its burden under the DOE regulations of proving "by clear and convincing evidence" that the challenged personnel action would have occurred even absent

88

P:\DECISION\1102.tso.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the Matter of Personnel Security ) Filing Date: August 26, 2011 ) ) Case No. TSO-1102 ) ____________________________________) Issued: January 12, 2012 __________ Decision and Order __________ Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1/ under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations, I have

89

PSH-12-0097 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 7 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0097 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 29, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be restored. The Individual had been charged with committing a sexual battery. Although the Individual had testified that a jury had acquitted him of this charge, the Individual did not provide any documentation that he had been acquitted. Nor had the Individual presented sufficient evidence to resolve the concerns raised by his conduct. The Individual had also intentionally provided misleading information during a personnel security interview. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not mitigated any of these security concerns at the hearing.

90

PSH-12-0113 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0113 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On December 18, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be granted. The Individual had a history of two alcohol alcohol-related arrests. In addition, A DOE Psychologist found that the Individual would consume four to six alcoholic beverages during an evening on a weekly basis. The Psychologist accordingly concluded that the individual habitually used alcohol to excess. The Hearing Officer found that, since the Individual continued to drink excessive amounts of alcohol, he had not mitigated any of these security concerns at the hearing. PSH-12-0113.pdf More Documents & Publications

91

PSH-13-0086 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0086 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 29, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should be restored. The Record showed that the individual had two DUIs and that a DOE Psychologist also diagnosed him with Alcohol-Abuse. After hearing the testimony of a DOE Psychiatrist that, in his expert opinion, the Individual was far enough along in his recovery to be reformed or rehabilitated from his Alcohol Abuse, the Hearing Officer found that the Individual had shown that he was reformed or rehabilitated from his Alcohol-Abuse, and had therefore mitigated the security concerns raised by his Alcohol Abuse and criminal activity since that activity was symptomatic

92

PSH-11-0009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PSH-11-0009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On March 1, 2012 a Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which he determined that an individual's access authorization should be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not resolved security concerns under Criteria H and J associated with a the Individual's admission of alcohol misuse, a recent 2011 arrest of Driving While Intoxicated, and a diagnosis by a DOE-contractor psychologist (DOE Psychologist) of Alcohol Related Disorder. At the hearing, the Individual produced testimony indicating that he had completed an Intensive Outpatient Program, participated in an Alcoholics Anonymous program, and had been

93

PSH-12-0145 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-0145 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2-0145 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0145 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing On April 16, 2013, a Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which he determined that an individual's access authorization should be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had resolved security concerns under Criteria H and J associated with a July 2012 Driving While Intoxicated arrest and a Alcohol Abuse diagnosis by a DOE-Contractor Psychologist. At the hearing, the Individual submitted substantial evidence regarding his successful completion of an intensive outpatient program for his Alcohol Abuse and his intention to forever continue his abstinence from alcohol. The Individual also submitted testimony from others attesting to his changed attitude to alcohol and the

94

Summary of Decisions - February 4, 2013 - February 8, 2013 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary of Decisions - February 4, 2013 - February 8, 2013 Summary of Decisions - February 4, 2013 - February 8, 2013 Summary of Decisions - February 4, 2013 - February 8, 2013 February 8, 2013 - 8:20am Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On February 4, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance after concerns were raised about his possible falsification of information provided on security questionnaires and past drug use. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, with respect to the

95

LWA-0005 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Francis M.  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Francis M. 5 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Francis M. O'Laughlin LWA-0005 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Francis M. O'Laughlin This is an appeal by complainant Francis O'Laughlin of the Initial Agency Decision by an Office of Hearings and Appeals ("OHA") Hearing Officer who found, following two days of hearings, that the complainant had not satisfied his burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that he made protected safety disclosures to respondent Boeing Petroleum Services, Inc., a contractor of the Department of Energy's Strategic Petroleum Reserve, as required by 10 C.F.R. Part 708. On appeal, the complainant challenges the Hearing Officer's finding that he had not met his burden of showing that he had made protected health or

96

Summary of Decisions - October 1, 2012 - October 5, 2012 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary of Decisions - October 1, 2012 - October 5, 2012 Summary of Decisions - October 1, 2012 - October 5, 2012 Summary of Decisions - October 1, 2012 - October 5, 2012 October 5, 2012 - 3:21pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On October 2, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that DOE should not grant an individual an access authorization. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance because of concerns regarding the individual's use of alcohol and prior criminal activity. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to mitigate these security concerns. Specifically, he cited the fact that the individual had only recently begun receiving counseling with regard to his

97

PSH-12-0130 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 0 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0130 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On April 1, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should not grant an individual access authorization. As security concerns under 10 CFR Part 710, a Local Security Office (LSO) cited the individual's 2001 indictment for violation of a federal criminal statute governing conduct of federal employees, and security infractions that she committed in 2010 and 2011, while in her current position, when she brought a cell phone into a Controlled Access Area. The Hearing Officer found that the individual had resolved the concern raised by the 2010 and 2011 security infractions, given her lack of intent, the isolated nature of the events, the fact that she received

98

PSH-13-0043 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0043 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 9, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should restore an individual's access authorization. As security concerns under Criteria H and J of 10 CFR Part 710, a Local Security Office (LSO) cited a DOE Psychiatrist's diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder and Alcohol-Related Disorder (Not Otherwise Specified), a history of annual alcohol intoxication, and an October 2012 event in which the individual self-treated his depression with sleeping pills and beer. The Hearing Officer found that the individual had resolved the concerns related to his depression and inappropriate alcohol use as a result of his voluntary treatment following the October 2012

99

PSH-12-0123 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

23 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 23 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0123 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On February 15, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should not restore an individual's access authorization. As security concerns under 10 CFR Part 710, a Local Security Office cited the individual's filing of a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition in 2002, and the individual's more recent financial difficulties, including a number of delinquent debts, the largest of which was a $132,489 mortgage balance, payments on which were over 150 days past due. The Hearing Officer found that, while the individual had made some progress toward paying off his prior debts, significant debts remained unpaid, including his mortgage, and the individual had, in addition,

100

PSH-13-0038 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0038 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On June 26, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she determined that an Individual's access authorization should not be granted. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not resolved the security concerns arising from an opinion of a licensed medical professional that he has a mental condition which causes or may cause a significant defect in judgment and reliability and the Individual's past unreliable behavior. A DOE psychologist opined that the Individual has a mental trait that makes him unreliable. The Local Security Office (LSO) raised the DOE psychologist's opinion as a security concern under Criterion H of the Part 710 regulations. The LSO

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "hearing officer decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

PSH-12-0083 - In the Matter of In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

83 - In the Matter of In the Matter of Personnel Security 83 - In the Matter of In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0083 - In the Matter of In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 14, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance for failing to comply with rules regarding the handling of classified information and conduct within limited access areas and for failing to report such non-compliance. This behavior raised security concerns under Criteria G and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security

102

PSH-13-0045 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0045 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 15, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should grant an individual access authorization. As security concerns under Criterion L of 10 CFR Part 710, a Local Security Office (LSO) cited the individual's dual citizenship, his holding a passport issued by his country of birth and substantial investments maintained in that country, and his availing himself of benefits available to citizens of that country. The Hearing Officer found that the individual had resolved these concerns: the individual was willing to relinquish his foreign citizenship, no longer intended to renew his now expired foreign passport, and had transferred the majority of his

103

R:\DECISION\0061.VBA  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2003 2003 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Petitioner: Bernard Cowan Date of Filing: July 18, 2002 Case Number: VBA-0061 On July 18, 2002, Argonne National Laboratory-West ("ANL" or "the contractor") filed an appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued by an Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) Hearing Officer under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 CFR Part 708. Bernard Cowan, 28 DOE ¶ 87,023 (2002). The IAD found that the contractor retaliated against Bernard Cowan ("Cowan" or "the complainant"), an employee at ANL, for making disclosures protected under Part 708. The IAD ordered the contractor to reinstate Cowan, provide him with back pay, and reimburse him for the reasonable costs and expenses of prosecuting his

104

Summary of Decisions - September 16, 2013 - September 20, 2013 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6, 2013 - September 20, 2013 6, 2013 - September 20, 2013 Summary of Decisions - September 16, 2013 - September 20, 2013 September 20, 2013 - 7:46am Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On September 19, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should restore an individual's access authorization. As a security concern, a Local Security Office cited the report of the DOE psychologist, in which he concluded that the individual met criteria found in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV-TR (DSM-IV-TR) for Opioid Dependence, and that this condition causes, or may cause, a significant defect in judgment and reliability. In accord with the hearing testimony of the DOE psychologist, the Hearing Officer found that there was a low risk that the individual's condition

105

Summary of Decisions - September 16, 2013 - September 20, 2013 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

16, 2013 - September 20, 2013 16, 2013 - September 20, 2013 Summary of Decisions - September 16, 2013 - September 20, 2013 September 20, 2013 - 7:46am Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On September 19, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should restore an individual's access authorization. As a security concern, a Local Security Office cited the report of the DOE psychologist, in which he concluded that the individual met criteria found in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV-TR (DSM-IV-TR) for Opioid Dependence, and that this condition causes, or may cause, a significant defect in judgment and reliability. In accord with the hearing testimony of the DOE psychologist, the Hearing Officer found that there was a low risk that the individual's condition

106

Summary of Decisions - December 2, 2013 - December 6, 2013 | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2, 2013 - December 6, 2013 2, 2013 - December 6, 2013 Summary of Decisions - December 2, 2013 - December 6, 2013 December 6, 2013 - 2:44pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On November 29, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not restore an individual's access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) cited concerns raised by the individual's use of alcohol habitually to excess and an opinion by a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE psychologist) that the individual's excessive use of alcohol was an illness or mental conditions that causes or may cause a significant defect in judgment and reliability. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented

107

Summary of Decisions - November 26, 2012 - November 30, 2012 | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

26, 2012 - November 30, 2012 26, 2012 - November 30, 2012 Summary of Decisions - November 26, 2012 - November 30, 2012 November 30, 2012 - 1:32pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On November 26, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance because the individual demonstrated financial irresponsibility through his current delinquent debts and charged off debts, and his inability or unwillingness to live within his means. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, he found that

108

Summary of Decisions - September 23, 2013 - September 27, 2013 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

23, 2013 - September 27, 2013 23, 2013 - September 27, 2013 Summary of Decisions - September 23, 2013 - September 27, 2013 September 27, 2013 - 1:41pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On September 27, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not restore an individual's access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) cited concerns raised by the individual's use of alcohol habitually to excess and a diagnosis by a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE psychologist) that the individual met criteria found in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV-TR (DSM-IV-TR) for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented

109

Summary of Decisions - November 4, 2013 - November 8, 2013 | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4, 2013 - November 8, 2013 4, 2013 - November 8, 2013 Summary of Decisions - November 4, 2013 - November 8, 2013 November 8, 2013 - 2:57pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On November 5, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. In April 2013, as part of a background investigation, the local security office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address concerns about his alcohol use. During that PSI, the individual was referred to a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE psychologist) for an agency-sponsored evaluation who concluded that the individual suffers from Alcohol Dependence. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer

110

Summary of Decisions - September 23, 2013 - September 27, 2013 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3, 2013 - September 27, 2013 3, 2013 - September 27, 2013 Summary of Decisions - September 23, 2013 - September 27, 2013 September 27, 2013 - 1:41pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On September 27, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not restore an individual's access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) cited concerns raised by the individual's use of alcohol habitually to excess and a diagnosis by a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE psychologist) that the individual met criteria found in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV-TR (DSM-IV-TR) for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented

111

P:\DECISION\psh-12-0076.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

The original of this document contains information which is subject to withholding from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. § 552. Such material has been deleted from this copy and replaced with XXXXXX's. United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: June 25, 2012 ) Case No. PSH-12-0076 ) ____________________________________) Issued: October 26, 2012 __________ Hearing Officer Decision __________ Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1/ under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for

112

SIGNATURE OF THIS MEMORAND TES A RECORD OF THIS DECISION. NEPA Compliance Officer Signature:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MEMORAND MEMORAND TES A RECORD OF THIS DECISION. NEPA Compliance Officer Signature: EPA Compliance Officer Date: (93 Page 1 of 2 INIC*EF2a U.S. DEPARTI\ LENT OF ENERGY F.ERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NFPA DETERI\ 11-NATION RECIPIENT:Tennessee Tech University STATE: TN PROJECT TITLE : Recovery Act: Multi-level Energy Storage and Controls for Large-scale Wind Energy Integration Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-PS36-09G099009 DE-EE0001 383 GF0-10-010 0 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.IA), I have made the following determination: CX, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering (including, but not limited to, literature surveys, inventories, audits), data analysis (including

113

R:\DECISION\0086.VBA  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5, 2004 5, 2004 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Appeal Name of Petitioner: Elaine M. Blakely Date of Filing: July 9, 2003 Case Number: VBA-0086 This Decision considers an Appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued on June 25, 2003, involving a Complaint filed by Elaine M. Blakely (Blakely or the Complainant) under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. In her Complaint, Blakely claims that her former employer, DOE contractor Fluor Fernald, Inc. (FFI or the contractor), retaliated against her for engaging in activity that is protected by Part 708. In the IAD, an Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) Hearing Officer determined that Blakely engaged in activity that is protected under Part 708,

114

Offices | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Offices Offices Offices All Offices Program Offices Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy Loan Programs Office Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Office of Environmental Management Office of Fossil Energy Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs Office of Legacy Management Office of Nuclear Energy Office of Science Staff Offices Office of Congressional and Intergovernmental Affairs Office of Economic Impact and Diversity Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis Office of Health, Safety and Security Office of Hearings and Appeals Office of Inspector General Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence Office of Management Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance Office of Policy and International Affairs

115

PSH-12-0043 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

43 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 43 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0043 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On August 28, 2012, a Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which he determined that an individual's access authorization should be granted. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had resolved security concerns under Criteria H and J associated with her excessive consumption of alcohol in college and a determination from a DOE-contractor Psychologist (DOE-Psychologist), that, despite possessing good judgment and reliability, the Individual suffered from Alcohol-Related Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified, and had been a user of alcohol habitually to excess in the past. To demonstrate adequate evidence of rehabilitation, the DOE Psychologist opined that the Individual would

116

PSH-13-0094 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0094 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 5, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. In April 2013, as part of a background investigation, the local security office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address concerns about his alcohol use. During that PSI, the individual was referred to a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE psychologist) for an agency-sponsored evaluation who concluded that the individual suffers from Alcohol Dependence. The individual's behavior raised security concerns under Criteria H and J. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the

117

PSH-12-0063 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

63 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 63 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0063 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 26, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office (LSO) suspended the individual's security clearance because (1) a DOE consultant psychiatrist diagnosed the individual as suffering from Alcohol Abuse/Dependence, (2) the individual had been arrested four times on alcohol-related charges and had received substance abuse treatment, and (3) the individual had a history of criminal behavior, of financial irresponsibility, and of failing to keep commitments made to the LSO. This derogatory information raised security concerns under Criteria H, J, and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the

118

PSH-12-0043 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PSH-12-0043 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0043 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0043 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On August 28, 2012, a Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which he determined that an individual's access authorization should be granted. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had resolved security concerns under Criteria H and J associated with her excessive consumption of alcohol in college and a determination from a DOE-contractor Psychologist (DOE-Psychologist), that, despite possessing good judgment and reliability, the Individual suffered from Alcohol-Related Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified, and had been a user of alcohol habitually to excess in the past. To demonstrate adequate evidence of rehabilitation, the DOE Psychologist opined that the Individual would

119

PSH-12-0096 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

096 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 096 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0096 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On December 13, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she determined that an Individual's access authorization should not be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not resolved the security concerns arising from her diagnosis of Narcissistic Personality Disorder or her misuse of technology. The Individual was diagnosed by a DOE psychologist with NPD and Adjustment Disorder, with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood. The DOE psychologist found that the NPD was an illness or mental condition which causes or may cause a significant defect in judgment or reliability. The Individual presented the

120

PSH-13-0071 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0071 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 10, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. In March 2013, as part of a background investigation, the local security office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address concerns about his alcohol use and alcohol-related incidents. During that PSI, the individual was referred to a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE psychologist) for an agency-sponsored evaluation who concluded that the individual suffers from Alcohol Abuse. The individual's behavior raised security concerns Criteria H, J and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "hearing officer decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

PSH-12-0103 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PSH-12-0103 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0103 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0103 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 5, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that access authorization should not be granted to an individual. A Local Security Office denied access authorization to the individual because she demonstrated financial irresponsibility through (1) failing to file federal and state income taxes for seven years, Tax Year (TY) 2004 through TY 2010; (2) accruing unpaid federal tax liability of $37,619.37 and unpaid state tax liability of $6,885.00; and (3) claiming nine tax withholding allowances when she knew she should only claim one. Her behavior raised security concerns under Criterion L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the

122

PSH-13-0041 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

41 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 41 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0041 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On June 26, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be restored. The individual had a history of three arrests, one of which was alcohol-related. The individual also had two incidents at work involving alcohol. The individual also had a longstanding history of minor financial irresponsibility. A DOE Psychiatrist diagnosed the individual with Alcohol-Abuse/Alcohol Dependence and Cognitive Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (CDNOS). The Hearing Officer found that the DOE Psychiatrist could not explain or defend either of his alcohol diagnosis's and that the DOE Psychiatrist was unwilling to conclude that the Individual's

123

PSH-12-0066 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

66 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 66 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0066 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing A Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which he determined that an individual's access authorization should not be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not resolved security concerns under Criteria H and J associated with a recent Driving Under the Influence arrest and a determination from a DOE-contractor Psychologist that the Individual suffered from Alcohol-Related Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified. Additionally, while finding that the Individual had resolved Criterion L concerns relating to inaccurate answers provided in a background investigation, a Questionnaire for National Security Positions, and a personnel security interview, the

124

PSH-13-0041 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0041 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On June 26, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be restored. The individual had a history of three arrests, one of which was alcohol-related. The individual also had two incidents at work involving alcohol. The individual also had a longstanding history of minor financial irresponsibility. A DOE Psychiatrist diagnosed the individual with Alcohol-Abuse/Alcohol Dependence and Cognitive Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (CDNOS). The Hearing Officer found that the DOE Psychiatrist could not explain or defend either of his alcohol diagnosis's and that the DOE Psychiatrist was unwilling to conclude that the Individual's

125

Summary of Decisions - May 20, 2013 - May 24, 2013 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 20, 2013 - May 24, 2013 May 20, 2013 - May 24, 2013 Summary of Decisions - May 20, 2013 - May 24, 2013 May 24, 2013 - 1:19pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On May 22, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should grant an individual access authorization. As security concerns, a Local Security Office (LSO) cited the individual's past and present association with persons engaged in illegal drug use and possession in his presence. The Hearing Officer found that the individual no longer associates with persons who use illegal drugs or engage in any other illegal activity, and there was no basis in the record for a concern that the individual will have such associations in the future. Accordingly, the Hearing Officer found that the DOE should grant

126

Summary of Decisions - June 3, 2013 - June 7, 2013 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 3, 2013 - June 7, 2013 June 3, 2013 - June 7, 2013 Summary of Decisions - June 3, 2013 - June 7, 2013 June 7, 2013 - 1:31pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On June 6, 2013, a Hearing Officer determined that an individual's security clearance should be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual successfully addressed the DOE's security concerns regarding his alcohol use. Specifically, the Hearing Officer concluded that the individual, who had been diagnosed by a DOE psychiatrist with Alcohol Abuse, achieved adequate evidence of rehabilitation and reformation. In addition, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had satisfied the following mitigating factors as outlined in the Adjudicative Guidelines: (1) the individual acknowledged

127

PSH-11-0003 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

03 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 03 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0003 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing Personnel Security Hearing (PSH-11-0003). On February 1, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should not grant an individual's access authorization. A DOE consultant psychiatrist, noting that the individual drank to intoxication four times per month, found that the individual was a user of alcohol habitually to excess, and that this pattern of consumption indicated that the individual had an illness or mental condition that causes, or may cause, a significant defect in judgment or reliability. At the hearing in the matter, the individual testified that he had abstained from consuming alcohol since the

128

P:\DECISION\psh-12-0073.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 21, 2012 ) June 21, 2012 ) Case No. PSH-12-0073 ) ) ____________________________________) Issued: November 8, 2012 __________ Hearing Officer Decision __________ Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1/ under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations, I have determined that the individual's access authorization should be restored.

129

P:\DECISION\psh-12-0059.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Security Security ) Filing Date: May 16, 2012 ) ) Case No. PSH-12-0059 ) ____________________________________) Issued: September 13, 2012 __________ Hearing Officer Decision __________ Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1/ under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations, I have determined that the individual's access authorization should not be granted.

130

P:\DECISION\psh-12-0038.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

April 17, 2012 April 17, 2012 ) ) Case No. PSH-12-0038 ) ____________________________________) Issued: August 9, 2012 __________ Hearing Officer Decision __________ Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1/ under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations, I have determined that the individual's access authorization should be restored. I. Background

131

PSH-12-0093 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0093 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 15, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual should be granted authorization access. A Local Security Office denied the individual a security clearance because (1) during the five-year period that the individual attended a university his use of alcohol regularly resulted in his intoxication, including at least 100 instances in which the individual either passed-out or blacked-out and two instances in which law enforcement officers were involved and (2) the individual had been diagnosed with Alcohol-Related Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified, by a DOE psychologist. The individual's behavior raised security concerns under Criteria H and J.

132

P:\DECISION\0071.tee.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

OHA Exception Decisions issued since July 5, 1995, are available on the OHA website OHA Exception Decisions issued since July 5, 1995, are available on the OHA website located at http://www.oha.doe.gov. The text of a cited decision may be accessed by entering the case number of the decision in the search engine located at http://www.oha.doe.gov/search.htm. June 11, 2010 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Name of Case: Monroe Oil Company Date of Filing: May 26, 2010 Case Number: TEE-0071 On May 26, 2010, Monroe Oil Company (Monroe) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests that it be permanently relieved of the requirement to prepare and file the Energy Information Administration (EIA) Form EIA-782B, entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product

133

P:\DECISION\psh-12-0074.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Security Hearing Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: June 25, 2012 ) Case No. PSH-12-0074 ) ____________________________________) Issued: November 1, 2012 __________ Hearing Officer Decision __________ Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1/ under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations, I have determined that the individual's access authorization should not be restored at this time.

134

Summary of Decisions - October 28, 2013 - November 1, 2013 | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8, 2013 - November 1, 2013 8, 2013 - November 1, 2013 Summary of Decisions - October 28, 2013 - November 1, 2013 November 1, 2013 - 9:12am Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On November 1, 2013, a Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's access authorization should not be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not resolved security concerns regarding the concerns arising from his lengthy history of financial irresponsibility and his failure to timely comply with an information request regarding his financial status. At the hearing, the individual testified that his failure to provide the financial information in a timely manner was caused, in part, by his son's automobile accident and the death of his neighbor. The

135

P:\DECISION\0105.tbh.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 20, 2011 January 20, 2011 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Motion For Summary Judgement Initial Agency Decision Name of Case: Colleen Monk Date of Filing: August 25, 2010 Case Number: TBH-0105 This Decision concerns a Complaint filed by Colleen Monk (hereinafter referred to as "Ms. Monk" or "the Complainant") against Washington TRU Solutions, VJ Technologies, and Mobile Characterization Services (hereinafter referred to individually as "WTS," "VJT," and "MCS,"

136

Summary of Decisions - December 3, 2012 - December 7, 2012 | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

, 2012 - December 7, 2012 , 2012 - December 7, 2012 Summary of Decisions - December 3, 2012 - December 7, 2012 December 7, 2012 - 10:20am Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On December 6, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer determined that an individual should be granted a security clearance. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had successfully addressed the DOE's security concerns regarding his alcohol consumption. Specifically, the Hearing Officer concluded that the individual's eight months of abstinence and Alcohol Anonymous attendance, along with the strength of his motivation to stop drinking and his ability to socialize with drinkers without feeling an urge to drink himself, among other factors, were sufficient to demonstrate rehabilitation from Alcohol Abuse. OHA Case No.

137

Summary of Decisions - November 12, 2012 - November 16, 2012 | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary of Decisions - November 12, 2012 - November 16, 2012 Summary of Decisions - November 12, 2012 - November 16, 2012 Summary of Decisions - November 12, 2012 - November 16, 2012 November 16, 2012 - 2:26pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On November 15, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual should be granted authorization access. A Local Security Office denied the individual a security clearance because (1) during the five-year period that the individual attended a university his use of alcohol regularly resulted in his intoxication, including at least 100 instances in which the individual either passed-out or blacked-out and two instances in which law enforcement officers were involved and (2) the individual had been diagnosed with Alcohol-Related

138

Office of Legacy Management Decision Tree for Solar Photovoltaic Projects - 13317  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

To support consideration of renewable energy power development as a land reuse option, the DOE Office of Legacy Management (LM) and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) established a partnership to conduct an assessment of wind and solar renewable energy resources on LM lands. From a solar capacity perspective, the larger sites in the western United States present opportunities for constructing solar photovoltaic (PV) projects. A detailed analysis and preliminary plan was developed for three large sites in New Mexico, assessing the costs, the conceptual layout of a PV system, and the electric utility interconnection process. As a result of the study, a 1,214-hectare (3,000-acre) site near Grants, New Mexico, was chosen for further study. The state incentives, utility connection process, and transmission line capacity were key factors in assessing the feasibility of the project. LM's Durango, Colorado, Disposal Site was also chosen for consideration because the uranium mill tailings disposal cell is on a hillside facing south, transmission lines cross the property, and the community was very supportive of the project. LM worked with the regulators to demonstrate that the disposal cell's long-term performance would not be impacted by the installation of a PV solar system. A number of LM-unique issues were resolved in making the site available for a private party to lease a portion of the site for a solar PV project. A lease was awarded in September 2012. Using a solar decision tree that was developed and launched by the EPA and NREL, LM has modified and expanded the decision tree structure to address the unique aspects and challenges faced by LM on its multiple sites. The LM solar decision tree covers factors such as land ownership, usable acreage, financial viability of the project, stakeholder involvement, and transmission line capacity. As additional sites are transferred to LM in the future, the decision tree will assist in determining whether a solar PV project is feasible on the new sites. (authors)

Elmer, John; Butherus, Michael [S.M. Stoller Corporation (United States)] [S.M. Stoller Corporation (United States); Barr, Deborah L. [U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management (United States)] [U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management (United States)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

139

Summary of Decisions - March 4, 2013 - March 8, 2013 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4, 2013 - March 8, 2013 4, 2013 - March 8, 2013 Summary of Decisions - March 4, 2013 - March 8, 2013 March 8, 2013 - 10:08am Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On March 5, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be granted. A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about his misrepresentations and misuse of information technology. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual presented sufficient evidence to resolve the security concerns associated with his misuse of information technology. However, she found that the individual had not sufficiently mitigated the

140

Summary of Decisions - February 4, 2013 - February 8, 2013 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4, 2013 - February 8, 2013 4, 2013 - February 8, 2013 Summary of Decisions - February 4, 2013 - February 8, 2013 February 8, 2013 - 8:20am Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On February 4, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance after concerns were raised about his possible falsification of information provided on security questionnaires and past drug use. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, with respect to the individual's omissions on security forms, she found that the requisite

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "hearing officer decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Summary of Decisions - October 8, 2012 - October 12, 2012 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8, 2012 - October 12, 2012 8, 2012 - October 12, 2012 Summary of Decisions - October 8, 2012 - October 12, 2012 October 12, 2012 - 1:22pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On October 11, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance for providing false information on a Questionnaire for National Security Positions (QNSP) and failing to comply with rules regarding the handling of classified information and conduct within limited access areas. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, he

142

Summary of Decisions - October 1, 2012 - October 5, 2012 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

, 2012 - October 5, 2012 , 2012 - October 5, 2012 Summary of Decisions - October 1, 2012 - October 5, 2012 October 5, 2012 - 3:21pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On October 2, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that DOE should not grant an individual an access authorization. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance because of concerns regarding the individual's use of alcohol and prior criminal activity. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to mitigate these security concerns. Specifically, he cited the fact that the individual had only recently begun receiving counseling with regard to his

143

Summary of Decisions - August 26, 2013 - August 30, 2013 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6, 2013 - August 30, 2013 6, 2013 - August 30, 2013 Summary of Decisions - August 26, 2013 - August 30, 2013 August 30, 2013 - 1:14pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On August 27, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision finding that the individual should be granted a security clearance after she determined that the individual had mitigated the security concerns associated with the individual's failure to file federal tax returns for tax years 2010 and 2011. The Hearing Officer first found that the individual was young and immature when he failed to file his tax returns at issue. She determined that the individual relied heavily on his mother for advice and instruction on the matter, noting that the individual lived with his mother until recently. The Hearing Officer held that the mother's misunderstanding

144

Summary of Decisions - August 19, 2013 - August 23, 2013 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

19, 2013 - August 23, 2013 19, 2013 - August 23, 2013 Summary of Decisions - August 19, 2013 - August 23, 2013 August 23, 2013 - 9:23am Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On August 22, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. In January and March 2013, as part of a background investigation, the local security office (LSO) conducted a personnel security interview (PSI) of the individual to address concerns about the individual's pattern of criminal conduct. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had presented adequate evidence to mitigate the security concerns associated with his alleged involvement in illegal gaming, and with his two charges of

145

Summary of Decisions - October 8, 2012 - October 12, 2012 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8, 2012 - October 12, 2012 8, 2012 - October 12, 2012 Summary of Decisions - October 8, 2012 - October 12, 2012 October 12, 2012 - 1:22pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On October 11, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance for providing false information on a Questionnaire for National Security Positions (QNSP) and failing to comply with rules regarding the handling of classified information and conduct within limited access areas. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, he

146

Deputy Secretary Decision Affirming Decision as Modified, January 19, 2000  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Daniel Holsinger, Complainant, v. K-Ray Security, Inc., Respondent OHA Case Nos. VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 Daniel Holsinger, Complainant, v. K-Ray Security, Inc., Respondent OHA Case Nos. VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 DECISION AFFIRMING AGENCY DECISION AS MODIFIED Issued: January 19, 2000 This is a request for review by K-Ray Security, Inc., the current security operations contractor at DOE's Federal Energy Technology Center ("FETC"), of the Decision of the Office of Hearings and Appeals ("OHA") on remand from the Deputy Secretary adhering, after an additional evidentiary hearing and an assessment of the equities, to its earlier finding that reinstatement of Complainant Holsinger as a security guard is a necessary and appropriate action to effect full relief, even though it was the prior security contractor, Watkins Security Agency, Inc., ("WSA") that was found to have committed the act of reprisal

147

Deputy Secretary Decision Remanding VWA-0005 Decision and Order  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DANIEL HOLSINGER, Complainant DANIEL HOLSINGER, Complainant v. K-RAY SECURITY, INC., Respondent. OHA Case No. LWA-0005, LWA-0009 DECISION REVERSING AND REMANDING INITIAL AGENCY DECISION This is a request for review by K-Ray Security, Inc., from the Initial Agency Decision by the Office of Hearings and Appeals ("OHA"), finding that reinstatement of Mr. Holsinger as a security guard is a necessary and appropriate action to effect full relief for a retaliatory termination made by the previous security contractor, Watkins Security Agency, Inc., ("WSA"). Based upon my review of the regulatory language, the relevant case law, and the entire record, I conclude that OHA's decision is incorrect. Mr. Holsinger filed a complaint with the Office of Contractor Employee Protection ("OCEP") on October 7, 1994. R. 103-106. He

148

P:\DECISION\0003.tba.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 5 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Appeal Name of Petitioner: Gilbert J. Hinojos Date of Filing: May 13, 2005 Case Number: TBA-0003 This Decision considers an Appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued on April 27, 2005, involving a Complaint filed by Gilbert J. Hinojos (also referred to as the employee or the complainant) under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. In his Complaint, Hinojos claims that his former employer, DOE contractor Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies (Honeywell or the contractor), retaliated against him for engaging in activity that is protected by Part 708. In the IAD, an Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) Hearing Officer determined that the employee engaged in activity

149

P:\DECISION\0023.tba.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 9, 2007 July 9, 2007 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Appeal Name of Petitioner: Franklin C. Tucker Date of Filing: April 25, 2007 Case Number: TBA-0023 This Decision considers an Appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued on April 9, 2007, involving a Complaint of Retaliation filed by Franklin C. Tucker (also referred to as the employee or the complainant) under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. In his Complaint, Tucker claims that his former employer, DOE contractor BWXT Y-12, L.L.C. (BWXT or the contractor), retaliated against him for engaging in activity that is protected by Part 708. In the IAD, an Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) Hearing Officer determined that the employee

150

P:\DECISION\0088.tba.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 4, 2011 May 4, 2011 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Appeal Name of Petitioner: Arun K. Dutta Date of Filing: September 7, 2010 Case Number: TBA-0088 This Decision considers an Appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued on August 25, 2010, involving a Complaint of Retaliation filed by Arun K. Dutta (Mr. Dutta or the complainant) under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. In his Complaint, Mr. Dutta alleged that his former employer, Parsons Infrastructure and Technology Group, Inc. (Parsons or the contractor), retaliated against him for engaging in activity protected under Part 708. In the IAD, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) Hearing Officer determined that Mr. Dutta had engaged in activity that is protected under Part 708, but that Parsons had shown that

151

PSH-13-0004 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

04 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 04 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0004 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 1, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. In February and April 2012, as part of a background investigation, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted Personnel Security Interviews (PSIs) of the individual to address concerns about his alcohol use, drug use and falsifications. In addition to the PSIs, the LSO recommended a psychiatric evaluation of the individual by a DOE consultant psychiatrist (DOE psychiatrist). The DOE psychiatrist examined the individual in May 2012 and determined that he suffers from Alcohol Dependence. The DOE psychiatrist also reported that the individual had been previously

152

PSH-13-0004 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0004 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 1, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. In February and April 2012, as part of a background investigation, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted Personnel Security Interviews (PSIs) of the individual to address concerns about his alcohol use, drug use and falsifications. In addition to the PSIs, the LSO recommended a psychiatric evaluation of the individual by a DOE consultant psychiatrist (DOE psychiatrist). The DOE psychiatrist examined the individual in May 2012 and determined that he suffers from Alcohol Dependence. The DOE psychiatrist also reported that the individual had been previously

153

PSH-12-0118 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

18 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 18 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0118 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On January 17, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance after the individual had incurred $20,000 in charges while patronizing a "gentleman's club" on a single evening; approximately $17,000 of that amount was charged to his corporate credit card. His employer's staff psychologists were concerned about the role of alcohol consumption in this incident. Following psychological evaluations, the individual was diagnosed as suffering from Alcohol Abuse. The LSO suspended his access authorization citing Criteria H, J and L. After conducting a

154

PSH-12-0039 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 9 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0039 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On August 24, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision finding that the individual's security clearance should not be granted. A Local DOE Office had referred the individual's request for a security clearance to administrative review under 10 CFR Part 710 citing the following information as security concerns: (1) an opinion in December 2011 by a DOE psychiatrist that the individual meets the criteria set forth in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association, 4th edition, Text Revised (DSM-IV-TR) for Alcohol Dependence, in partial remission; (2) a 2001 charge for public intoxication; and (3) admissions by the individual that he drinks to escape job-related stress; that his wife

155

PSH-13-0063 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0063 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On September 12, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not restore an individual's access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) raised certain concerns regarding the individual's use of alcohol, citing a diagnosis by a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE psychologist) that the individual had suffered from Alcohol Dependence, which since had attenuated to Alcohol Abuse; the recommendation of the individual's primary care physician that the individual stop consuming alcohol and the physician's diagnoses of alcoholism, alcoholic hepatitis, liver damage, and type 2 diabetes; and statements by the individual regarding his use of alcohol and efforts at

156

PSH-13-0065 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0065 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On September 12, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not restore an individual's access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) raised certain concerns regarding the individual's use of alcohol, citing a diagnosis by a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE psychologist) that the individual had suffered from Alcohol Dependence, which since had attenuated to Alcohol Abuse; the recommendation of the individual's primary care physician that the individual stop consuming alcohol and the physician's diagnoses of alcoholism, alcoholic hepatitis, liver damage, and type 2 diabetes; and statements by the individual regarding his use of alcohol and efforts at

157

PSH-12-0126 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

26 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 26 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0126 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On February 1, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance after the individual tested positive on a random Breath Alcohol Test (BAT). The individual acknowledged that, since 2009, he would routinely drink to 18 12-ounce beers each weekend and has become intoxicated almost weekly. Subsequent to testing positive on the random BAT, the individual began to abstain from drinking all alcohol and commenced an intensive outpatient alcohol treatment program (IOP). At the conclusion of the IOP, the individual was evaluated by a DOE consulting

158

PSH-13-0063 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PSH-13-0063 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0063 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0063 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On September 12, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not restore an individual's access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) raised certain concerns regarding the individual's use of alcohol, citing a diagnosis by a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE psychologist) that the individual had suffered from Alcohol Dependence, which since had attenuated to Alcohol Abuse; the recommendation of the individual's primary care physician that the individual stop consuming alcohol and the physician's diagnoses of alcoholism, alcoholic hepatitis, liver damage, and type 2 diabetes; and statements by the individual regarding his use of alcohol and efforts at

159

Summary of Decisions - June 10, 2013 - June 14, 2013 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary of Decisions - June 10, 2013 - June 14, 2013 Summary of Decisions - June 10, 2013 - June 14, 2013 Summary of Decisions - June 10, 2013 - June 14, 2013 June 14, 2013 - 2:49pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On June 11, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's authorization access should be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance following the individual contemplating suicide and, subsequently, being diagnosed by a DOE consulting psychologist as meeting the criteria for Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood, Chronic. The DOE psychologist had recommended, inter alia, that the individual undergo at least six months of counseling. As of the date of the hearing, the individual had fully engaged in the counseling process for nine months and

160

Summary of Decisions - April 15, 2013 - April 19, 2013 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5, 2013 - April 19, 2013 5, 2013 - April 19, 2013 Summary of Decisions - April 15, 2013 - April 19, 2013 April 22, 2013 - 1:54pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On April 16, 2013, a Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's access authorization should be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had resolved security concerns associated with a July 2012 Driving While Intoxicated arrest and a Alcohol Abuse diagnosis by a DOE psychologist. At the hearing, the individual submitted substantial evidence regarding his successful completion of an intensive outpatient program for his Alcohol Abuse and his intention to forever continue his abstinence from alcohol. The individual also submitted testimony from others attesting to

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "hearing officer decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

P:\DECISION\psh-12-0106.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

under 5 U.S.C. 552. Such material has been deleted from this copy and replaced with under 5 U.S.C. 552. Such material has been deleted from this copy and replaced with XXXXXX's. United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: August 9, 2012 ) Case No.: PSH-12-0106 ) ____________________________________) Issued: December 13, 2012 ______________ Decision and Order _______________ Robert B. Palmer, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization under the regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, entitled "Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or

162

R:\DECISION\0082.VBX  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

We did not find that LLNL had retaliated against Benson by We did not find that LLNL had retaliated against Benson by (i) assigning her to work on a different project; (ii) assigning her to work in a different building; or (iii) terminating her employment. January 14, 2003 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Supplemental Order Name of Case: Janet Benson Date of Filing: September 26, 2002 Case Number: VBX-0082 Janet Benson (Benson or Complainant) filed a Complaint of Retaliation alleging that her former employer, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL or the Laboratory), retaliated against her for engaging in activity that is protected by 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy's Contractor Employee Protection Program. On August 21, 2002, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy issued a Decision and Order

163

P:\DECISION\0100.tba.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Petitioner: Vinod Chudgar Date of Filing: January 28, 2011 Case Number: TBA-0100 This Decision considers an Appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued on January 13, 2011, involving a complaint of retaliation filed under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708, by Vinod Chudgar (hereinafter referred to as "the Complainant" or "Mr. Chudgar") against Savannah River Remediation (hereinafter referred to as "the Respondent" or "SRR"). SRR is the Management and Operations contractor for the Department of Energy's (DOE) Savannah River Site (SRS). In his complaint, Mr. Chudgar alleged that he

164

Deputy Secretary Decision Reversing LWA-0003 Decision and Order  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MEHTA, Complainant MEHTA, Complainant v. UNIVERSITIES RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, Respondent. OHA Case No.LWA-0003, LWZ-0023 FINAL DECISION AND ORDER This is an appeal by respondent Universities Research Association ("URA"), from the Initial Agency Decision by the Office of Hearings and Appeals ("OHA") finding that the complainant, Dr. Naresh C. Mehta, a scientist formerly employed by URA, had established that his disclosures of mismanagement were a contributing factor in URA's December 16, 1992, decision to terminate his employment. The Initial Agency Decision also reaffirmed OHA's previous denial of URA's motion to dismiss based on lack of jurisdiction under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. 1. On appeal, URA requests reconsideration of its motion to dismiss on jurisdictional grounds. URA contends that applying DOE's

165

Summary of Decisions - April 1, 2013 - April 5, 2013 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

, 2013 - April 5, 2013 , 2013 - April 5, 2013 Summary of Decisions - April 1, 2013 - April 5, 2013 April 5, 2013 - 3:32pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On April 1, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should not grant an individual access authorization. As security concerns, a Local Security Office (LSO) cited the individual's 2001 indictment for violation of a federal criminal statute governing conduct of federal employees, and security infractions that she committed in 2010 and 2011, while in her current position, when she brought a cell phone into a Controlled Access Area. The Hearing Officer found that the individual had resolved the concern raised by the 2010 and 2011 security infractions, given her lack of intent, the isolated

166

P:\DECISION\PSH-11-0007.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Such authorization Such authorization will be referred to variously in this Decision as access authorization or security clearance. * The original of this document contains information which is subject to withholding from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552. Such material has been deleted from this copy and replaced with XXXXXX's. United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the Matter of Personnel Security ) Filing Date: October 24, 2011 ) ) Case No. PSH-11-0007 ) ____________________________________) Issued: March 2, 2012 __________ Decision and Order __________ Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of xxxxxxxxxxxxx (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1/ under the Department of Energy's (DOE)

167

DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Appeal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

06 06 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Appeal Name of Petitioner: S.R. Davis Date of Filing: May 19, 2004 Case Number: VBA-0083 This Decision considers an Appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued on April 21, 2004, involving a complaint filed by S.R. Davis (also referred to as the Complainant) under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. In her Complaint, the Complainant claims that her former employer, Fluor Fernald, Inc. (the Contractor), retaliated against her for engaging in activity that is protected by Part 708. In the IAD, an Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) Hearing Officer determined that the Contractor met its burden of demonstrating, by clear and convincing evidence, that it would have taken the same action in the absence of the

168

Summary of Decisions - November 12, 2012 - November 16, 2012 | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

12, 2012 - November 16, 2012 12, 2012 - November 16, 2012 Summary of Decisions - November 12, 2012 - November 16, 2012 November 16, 2012 - 2:26pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On November 15, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual should be granted authorization access. A Local Security Office denied the individual a security clearance because (1) during the five-year period that the individual attended a university his use of alcohol regularly resulted in his intoxication, including at least 100 instances in which the individual either passed-out or blacked-out and two instances in which law enforcement officers were involved and (2) the individual had been diagnosed with Alcohol-Related Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified, by a DOE psychologist. After conducting

169

PSH-13-0012 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0012 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 17, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual should be granted authorization access. When the individual was 17 years old (2007), he was diagnosed with sudden onset diabetes (Type 1 - Insulin Dependent). While hospitalized to stabilize his diabetes, he was diagnosed with Adjustment Disorder NOS. Three months later, immediately following a traumatic telephone call with his girlfriend, he ingested a handful of over-the-counter medication in a suicide attempt. He was diagnosed with "Depression NOS." The individual disclosed his history of treatment for psychological disorders when he applied for access authorization four-and-one-half years later. A DOE

170

PSH-13-0025 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

25 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 25 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0025 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 11, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. Following the investigation by a DOE contractor that one of its managerial employees had engaged in sexual harassment and retaliation, the employee was disciplined and transferred to another position. The investigation concluded the individual had directed derogatory comments, epithets and slurs referencing sexual orientation towards subordinates (not thought to be gay); targeting such comments most heavily towards employees who were suspected of complaining to management about the work unit; directing subordinates not to speak to management with the individual's

171

PSH-13-0025 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0025 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 11, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. Following the investigation by a DOE contractor that one of its managerial employees had engaged in sexual harassment and retaliation, the employee was disciplined and transferred to another position. The investigation concluded the individual had directed derogatory comments, epithets and slurs referencing sexual orientation towards subordinates (not thought to be gay); targeting such comments most heavily towards employees who were suspected of complaining to management about the work unit; directing subordinates not to speak to management with the individual's

172

PSH-13-0016 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0016 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On June 20, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. Following an anonymous report, the Human Reliability Program at the individual's site investigated a report that the individual had been found incoherent and naked at a local convenience store one morning at 2am by one of his co-workers. During this investigation, the individual's HRP certification was suspended. As the investigation was being completed, the individual's access authorization came due for a periodic re-investigation. During that investigation, the individual reported higher alcohol consumption than he had during the earlier Personnel Security

173

Corel Office Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Hearing Officer Decision Name of Petitioner: Ronald D. White Date of Filing: October 27, 2000 Case Number: VBH-0068 This Decision involves a complaint filed by Ronald D. White (White or "Complainant") under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, codified at 10 C.F.R. Part 708. Complainant is a former employee of a DOE contractor, Midwest Research Institute (the contractor or MRI), the management and operating contractor of DOE's National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), located in Golden, Colorado. According to White, the contractor made him the subject of reprisals because he made protected disclosures to DOE and the contractor in January 1999 and May 2000. In his complaint, White alleges that the

174

P:\DECISION\0088.tbh.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 25, 2010 August 25, 2010 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Initial Agency Decision Name of Case: Arun K. Dutta Dates of Filing: December 4, 2009 Case Number: TBH-0088 This Decision concerns a Complaint filed by Arun K. Dutta (hereinafter referred to as "Mr. Dutta" or "the Complainant") against Parsons Infrastructure and Technology Group, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Parsons" or "the Respondent"), his former employer, under the Department of Energy's (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program regulations found at 10 C.F.R. Part 708.

175

DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1997 1997 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Motion to Dismiss Name of Petitioner: EG&G Rocky Flats, Inc. Date of Filing: June 13, 1997 Case Number: VWZ-0008 This decision will consider a Motion for Partial Dismissal and Limitation on Scope of Complainant's Claims filed by EG&G Rocky Flats, Inc. (EG&G) on June 13, 1997. In its motion, EG&G seeks partial dismissal of the underlying complaint and hearing request filed by Arthur Murfin (Murfin) under the Department of Energy's (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. Murfin's request for a hearing under 10 C.F.R. § 708.9 was filed on January 27, 1997, and it has been assigned Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) Case No. VWA-0016. I. Background The Department of Energy established its Contractor Employee Protection Program to safeguard "public

176

Summary of Decisions - July 22, 2013- July 26, 2013 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary of Decisions - July 22, 2013- July 26, 2013 Summary of Decisions - July 22, 2013- July 26, 2013 Summary of Decisions - July 22, 2013- July 26, 2013 July 26, 2013 - 10:06am Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On July 25, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office began an investigation of an individual's eligibility for access authorization after the individual was arrested for "public nuisance," having fallen asleep along the side of a building while intoxicated and partially undressed. The DOE consulting psychologist evaluated the individual and concluded that although he did not meet any DSM-IV-TR classification for alcohol disorders, he was a user of alcohol habitually to excess which is a condition that causes or could

177

Summary of Decisions - August 27 - August 31, 2012 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary of Decisions - August 27 - August 31, 2012 Summary of Decisions - August 27 - August 31, 2012 Summary of Decisions - August 27 - August 31, 2012 August 31, 2012 - 10:14am Addthis Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) On August 28, 2012, a Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's access authorization should be granted. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had resolved security concerns under Criteria H and J associated with her excessive consumption of alcohol in college and a determination from a DOE-contractor Psychologist (DOE-Psychologist), that, despite possessing good judgment and reliability, the individual suffered from Alcohol-Related Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified, and had been a user of alcohol habitually to excess in the past. To demonstrate adequate

178

Summary of Decisions - May 27, 2013 - May 31, 2013 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary of Decisions - May 27, 2013 - May 31, 2013 Summary of Decisions - May 27, 2013 - May 31, 2013 Summary of Decisions - May 27, 2013 - May 31, 2013 May 31, 2013 - 1:29pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On May 30, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should not restore an individual's access authorization. As security concerns under 10 CFR Part 710, a Local Security Office (LSO) cited (1) the report of a DOE consultant psychiatrist, in which he diagnosed the individual as suffering from Alcohol Abuse; (2) the individual's September 25, 2012, positive blood alcohol test at work; (3) his admission that, the evening before the test, he consumed approximately three Jack Daniels and three beers; (4) his admission that from 2009 to September 2012, he drank to the point of

179

Summary of Decisions - August 20 - August 24, 2012 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 - August 24, 2012 0 - August 24, 2012 Summary of Decisions - August 20 - August 24, 2012 August 29, 2012 - 10:16am Addthis Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) On August 22, 2012, a Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's access authorization should be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had resolved security concerns under Criterion J associated with his history of excessive consumption of beer and a determination from a DOE-contractor psychologist, that, despite not currently suffering from an illness that could cause a defect in judgment and reliability, the individual had been a user of alcohol habitually to excess in the past. At the hearing, the individual presented testimonial evidence that he had

180

Summary of Decisions - August 20 - August 24, 2012 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 - August 24, 2012 0 - August 24, 2012 Summary of Decisions - August 20 - August 24, 2012 August 29, 2012 - 10:16am Addthis Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) On August 22, 2012, a Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's access authorization should be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had resolved security concerns under Criterion J associated with his history of excessive consumption of beer and a determination from a DOE-contractor psychologist, that, despite not currently suffering from an illness that could cause a defect in judgment and reliability, the individual had been a user of alcohol habitually to excess in the past. At the hearing, the individual presented testimonial evidence that he had

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "hearing officer decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Summary of Decisions - June 10, 2013 - June 14, 2013 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0, 2013 - June 14, 2013 0, 2013 - June 14, 2013 Summary of Decisions - June 10, 2013 - June 14, 2013 June 14, 2013 - 2:49pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On June 11, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's authorization access should be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance following the individual contemplating suicide and, subsequently, being diagnosed by a DOE consulting psychologist as meeting the criteria for Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood, Chronic. The DOE psychologist had recommended, inter alia, that the individual undergo at least six months of counseling. As of the date of the hearing, the individual had fully engaged in the counseling process for nine months and

182

PSH-12-0106- In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On December 13, 2012, a Hearing Officer determined that an individuals security clearance should not be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had...

183

PSH-13-0015- In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On May 20, 2013, a Hearing Officer determined that an individuals security clearance should not be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not...

184

PSH-13-0072- In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On November 6, 2013, a Hearing Officer determined that an individuals security clearance should not be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had...

185

Summary of Decisions - January 28, 2013 - February 1, 2013 | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8, 2013 - February 1, 2013 8, 2013 - February 1, 2013 Summary of Decisions - January 28, 2013 - February 1, 2013 February 1, 2013 - 1:33pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On February 1, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance after the individual tested positive on a random Breath Alcohol Test (BAT). The individual acknowledged that, since 2009, he would routinely drink to 18 12-ounce beers each weekend and had become intoxicated almost weekly. Subsequent to testing positive on the random BAT, the individual began to abstain from drinking all alcohol and commenced an intensive outpatient alcohol treatment program (IOP). At the

186

Summary of Decisions - October 22, 2012 - October 26, 2012 | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

22, 2012 - October 26, 2012 22, 2012 - October 26, 2012 Summary of Decisions - October 22, 2012 - October 26, 2012 October 26, 2012 - 11:12am Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On October 25, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance because the individual demonstrated financial irresponsibility through, inter alia, (1) delinquent and collection debts totaling approximately $120,000; (2) unpaid state income taxes in the amount of $800; (3) the repossession of his camping trailer for nonpayment; (4) a series of financings secured by his residence between 1990 and 2004, the proceeds of which were primarily used for consumer purchases and the

187

Summary of Decisions - September 9, 2013 - September 13, 2013 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9, 2013 - September 13, 2013 9, 2013 - September 13, 2013 Summary of Decisions - September 9, 2013 - September 13, 2013 September 13, 2013 - 8:41am Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On September 12, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded the DOE should not restore an individual's access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) raised certain concerns regarding the individual's use of alcohol, citing a diagnosis by a DOE psychologist that the individual had suffered from Alcohol Dependence, which since had attenuated to Alcohol Abuse; the recommendation of the individual's primary care physician that the individual stop consuming alcohol and the physician's diagnoses of alcoholism, alcoholic hepatitis, liver damage, and type 2 diabetes; and statements by the individual

188

Summary of Decisions - October 22, 2012 - October 26, 2012 | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2, 2012 - October 26, 2012 2, 2012 - October 26, 2012 Summary of Decisions - October 22, 2012 - October 26, 2012 October 26, 2012 - 11:12am Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On October 25, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance because the individual demonstrated financial irresponsibility through, inter alia, (1) delinquent and collection debts totaling approximately $120,000; (2) unpaid state income taxes in the amount of $800; (3) the repossession of his camping trailer for nonpayment; (4) a series of financings secured by his residence between 1990 and 2004, the proceeds of which were primarily used for consumer purchases and the

189

Summary of Decisions - January 28, 2013 - February 1, 2013 | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8, 2013 - February 1, 2013 8, 2013 - February 1, 2013 Summary of Decisions - January 28, 2013 - February 1, 2013 February 1, 2013 - 1:33pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On February 1, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance after the individual tested positive on a random Breath Alcohol Test (BAT). The individual acknowledged that, since 2009, he would routinely drink to 18 12-ounce beers each weekend and had become intoxicated almost weekly. Subsequent to testing positive on the random BAT, the individual began to abstain from drinking all alcohol and commenced an intensive outpatient alcohol treatment program (IOP). At the

190

LWA-0003 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Universities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Universities Research Association, Inc. LWA-0003 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Universities Research Association, Inc. This is an appeal by respondent Universities Research Association ("URA"), from the Initial Agency Decision by the Office of Hearings and Appeals ("OHA") finding that the complainant, Dr. Naresh C. Mehta, a scientist formerly employed by URA, had established that his disclosures of mismanagement were a contributing factor in URA's December 16, 1992, decision to terminate his employment. The Initial Agency Decision also reaffirmed OHA's previous denial of URA's motion to dismiss based on lack of jurisdiction under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. 1. On appeal, URA requests reconsideration of its motion to dismiss on

191

DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Appeal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 9, 2007 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Appeal Name of Petitioner: Clint Olson Date of Filing: November 18, 2005 Case Number: TBA-0027 This Decision considers an Appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued on October 27, 2005, involving a Complaint of Retaliation filed by Clint Olson (also referred to as the employee or the complainant) under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. Olson was an employee of BWXT Pantex (also referred to as BWXT, the firm, or the contractor), the Management and Operating Contractor at the DOE's Pantex Plant in Amarillo, Texas. In his Complaint, Mr. Olson claims that BWXT retaliated against him for making disclosures that are protected under Part 708. In the IAD, an Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) Hearing

192

Deputy Secretary Decision Affirming VWA-0018 Decision and Order  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Thomas T. Tiller v. Wackenhut Services, Inc.; Washington, D.C. Case No. VWA-0018 Thomas T. Tiller v. Wackenhut Services, Inc.; Washington, D.C. Case No. VWA-0018 Final Decision and Order Issued by the Deputy Secretary of Energy Issued February 2, 1999 * The original of this document contains information which is subject to withholding from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552. Such material has been deleted from this copy and replaced with XXXXXXX's. This is a request for review by complainant Thomas T. Tiller of an Initial Agency Decision, issued by the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA), denying the two reprisal complaints that he filed pursuant to 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the regulation establishing the DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program. Mr. Tiller was employed by Wackenhut Services, Inc. (Wackenhut), a DOE contractor that provides paramilitary security support services at DOE's Savannah River Site in Aiken, South Carolina.

193

Deputy Secretary Decision Affirming LWA-0010 Decision and Order  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HOWARD W. SPALETTA, Complainant HOWARD W. SPALETTA, Complainant v. EG&G IDAHO, INC., Respondent. OHA Case No. LWA-0010 FINAL DECISION AND ORDER This is an appeal by complainant Howard W. Spaletta from the Initial Agency Decision by the Office of Hearings and Appeals ("OHA") finding that the complainant, an engineer formerly employed by EG&G Idaho, Inc. (EG&G), previously the DOE's management and operating contractor at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL), had established by a preponderance of the evidence that he suffered reprisal as a result of his protected safety disclosures, and ordering back pay and other remedial actions. However, OHA declined to grant the complainant certain further relief that he sought, and rejected his claim that his

194

Deputy Secretary Decision Affirming VWA-0008 Decision and Order  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

C. LAWRENCE CORNETT, ) ) Complainant, ) ) v. ) OHA Case No. VWA-0007 ) VWA-0008 MARIA ELENA TORAÑO ASSOCIATES, INC.) ) Respondent. ) FINAL AGENCY DECISION This is a request for review by Maria Elena Torano Associates, Inc. ("META"), a DOE contractor responsible for reviewing and revising the agency's waste management programmatic environmental impact statement ("PEIS"), of the Initial Agency Decision of the Office of Hearings and Appeals ("OHA") finding that Complainant C. Lawrence Cornett established that he had made protected health and safety disclosures under 10 C.F.R. Part 708 and that these disclosures were a contributing factor in his termination and finding further that META had not demonstrated that he would have been terminated absent the disclosures. R.

195

R:\DECISION\0083.VBH  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1, 2004 1, 2004 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Initial Agency Decision Name of Case: S.R. Davis Date of Filing: August 7, 2003 Case Number: VBH-0083 S.R. Davis (the Employee) filed a complaint against her former employer, Fluor Fernald, Inc. (the Contractor) under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. The Employee alleges that she engaged in protected activity and that the Contractor retaliated by subjecting her to two disciplinary actions, a job transfer, and ultimately a separation pursuant to an involuntary separation program. The Employee seeks relief including reinstatement and back-pay. As the decision below indicates, I have concluded that the Contractor would have taken the same actions in the absence of

196

VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel Holsinger, Complainant, v. K-Ray Security, Inc. VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel Holsinger, Complainant, v. K-Ray Security, Inc. This is a request for review by K-Ray Security, Inc., the current security operations contractor at DOE's Federal Energy Technology Center ("FETC"), of the Decision of the Office of Hearings and Appeals ("OHA") on remand from the Deputy Secretary adhering, after an additional evidentiary hearing and an assessment of the equities, to its earlier finding that reinstatement of Complainant Holsinger as a security guard is a necessary and appropriate action to effect full relief, even though it was the prior security contractor, Watkins Security Agency, Inc.,

197

VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel Holsinger, Complainant, v. K-Ray Security, Inc. VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel Holsinger, Complainant, v. K-Ray Security, Inc. This is a request for review by K-Ray Security, Inc., the current security operations contractor at DOE's Federal Energy Technology Center ("FETC"), of the Decision of the Office of Hearings and Appeals ("OHA") on remand from the Deputy Secretary adhering, after an additional evidentiary hearing and an assessment of the equities, to its earlier finding that reinstatement of Complainant Holsinger as a security guard is a necessary and appropriate action to effect full relief, even though it was the prior security contractor, Watkins Security Agency, Inc.,

198

P:\DECISION\psh-12-0117.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 10, 2012 ) September 10, 2012 ) Case No.: PSH-12-0117 ) ____________________________________) Issued: March 1, 2013 ______________ Decision and Order _______________ Robert B. Palmer, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") for access authorization under the regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, entitled "Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." 1 For the reasons set forth below, I conclude that the individual's security clearance should not be restored at this time. 2 I. BACKGROUND The individual is employed by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor, and was granted a security

199

P:\DECISION\psh-12-0094.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1, 2012 ) 1, 2012 ) Case No.: PSH-12-0094 ) ____________________________________) Issued: November 6, 2012 ______________ Decision and Order _______________ Robert B. Palmer, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") for access authorization under the regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, entitled "Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." 1 For the reasons set forth below, I conclude that the individual's security clearance should not be restored at this time. 2 I. BACKGROUND The individual is employed by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor, and was granted a

200

P:\DECISION\psh-11-0027.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

) ) Case No.: PSH-11-0027 ) ____________________________________) Issued: April 6, 2012 ______________ Decision and Order _______________ Robert B. Palmer, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") for access authorization under the regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, entitled "Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." 1 For the reasons set forth below, I conclude that the individual's security clearance should not be restored at this time. 2 I. BACKGROUND The individual is employed by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor, and was granted a security

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "hearing officer decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

VWA-0005 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel L. Holsinger  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel L. Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel L. Holsinger VWA-0005 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel L. Holsinger This is a request for review by K-Ray Security, Inc., from the Initial Agency Decision by the Office of Hearings and Appeals ("OHA"), finding that reinstatement of Mr. Holsinger as a security guard is a necessary and appropriate action to effect full relief for a retaliatory termination made by the previous security contractor, Watkins Security Agency, Inc., ("WSA"). Based upon my review of the regulatory language, the relevant case law, and the entire record, I conclude that OHA's decision is incorrect. Mr. Holsinger filed a complaint with the Office of Contractor Employee Protection ("OCEP") on October 7, 1994. R. 103-106. He alleged that he had

202

Summary of Decisions - August 27 - August 31, 2012 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 - August 31, 2012 7 - August 31, 2012 Summary of Decisions - August 27 - August 31, 2012 August 31, 2012 - 10:14am Addthis Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) On August 28, 2012, a Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's access authorization should be granted. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had resolved security concerns under Criteria H and J associated with her excessive consumption of alcohol in college and a determination from a DOE-contractor Psychologist (DOE-Psychologist), that, despite possessing good judgment and reliability, the individual suffered from Alcohol-Related Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified, and had been a user of alcohol habitually to excess in the past. To demonstrate adequate

203

Summary of Decisions - January 7, 2013 - January 11, 2013 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 7, 2013 - January 11, 2013 January 7, 2013 - January 11, 2013 Summary of Decisions - January 7, 2013 - January 11, 2013 January 11, 2013 - 8:33am Addthis On January 8, 2013, a Hearing Officer issued an Initial Agency Decision involving a complaint filed by John Robertson against KQ Services (KQ) under the DOE's Contractor Employee Protection Program and its governing regulations set forth at 10 CFR Part 708. In his complaint, Mr. Robertson alleged the he was terminated in retaliation for activity protected under Part 708. The complainant alleged that he made two disclosures pertaining to the condition of a lift gate on a KQ truck, and a third disclosure, reporting that a filing cabinet had fallen off the same lift gate. The Hearing Officer found, with regard to the first alleged disclosure, that

204

Summary of Decisions - October 7, 2013 - October 11, 2013 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

October 7, 2013 - October 11, 2013 October 7, 2013 - October 11, 2013 Summary of Decisions - October 7, 2013 - October 11, 2013 October 11, 2013 - 1:31pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On October 10, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office (LSO) received information that the individual had received garnishment notices from both federal and state tax authorities in January 2013. The LSO suspended the individual's security clearance, citing, inter alia, his unpaid taxes for prior years, his collections debt, his charged-off debt, and his delinquencies on his student loans. The individual and his wife credibly testified that during their 20-year marriage, the wife had managed exclusively the family's

205

Summary of Decisions - May 27, 2013 - May 31, 2013 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

27, 2013 - May 31, 2013 27, 2013 - May 31, 2013 Summary of Decisions - May 27, 2013 - May 31, 2013 May 31, 2013 - 1:29pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On May 30, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should not restore an individual's access authorization. As security concerns under 10 CFR Part 710, a Local Security Office (LSO) cited (1) the report of a DOE consultant psychiatrist, in which he diagnosed the individual as suffering from Alcohol Abuse; (2) the individual's September 25, 2012, positive blood alcohol test at work; (3) his admission that, the evening before the test, he consumed approximately three Jack Daniels and three beers; (4) his admission that from 2009 to September 2012, he drank to the point of

206

Summary of Decisions - July 1, 2013 - July 5, 2013 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 1, 2013 - July 5, 2013 July 1, 2013 - July 5, 2013 Summary of Decisions - July 1, 2013 - July 5, 2013 July 5, 2013 - 9:00am Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On July 1, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. In February and April 2012, as part of a background investigation, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted Personnel Security Interviews (PSIs) of the individual to address concerns about his alcohol use, drug use and falsifications. In addition to the PSIs, the LSO recommended a psychiatric evaluation of the individual by a DOE consultant psychiatrist (DOE psychiatrist). The DOE psychiatrist examined the individual in May 2012 and determined that he suffers from Alcohol

207

Summary of Decisions - October 7, 2013 - October 11, 2013 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7, 2013 - October 11, 2013 7, 2013 - October 11, 2013 Summary of Decisions - October 7, 2013 - October 11, 2013 October 11, 2013 - 1:31pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On October 10, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office (LSO) received information that the individual had received garnishment notices from both federal and state tax authorities in January 2013. The LSO suspended the individual's security clearance, citing, inter alia, his unpaid taxes for prior years, his collections debt, his charged-off debt, and his delinquencies on his student loans. The individual and his wife credibly testified that during their 20-year marriage, the wife had managed exclusively the family's

208

Summary of Decisions - June 17, 2013 - June 21, 2013 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 17, 2013 - June 21, 2013 June 17, 2013 - June 21, 2013 Summary of Decisions - June 17, 2013 - June 21, 2013 June 21, 2013 - 8:34am Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On June 20, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. During the individual's periodic re-investigation for security clearance eligibility, the individual reported higher alcohol consumption than he had during the earlier Personnel Security Interview (PSI) and a psychological investigation. The Local Security Office (LSO) investigated this discrepant reporting, and the individual acknowledged that he had been intentionally dishonest about his alcohol consumption because he was afraid he would lose his job. Based on the higher reported

209

VWA-0015 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Am-Pro Protective  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

VWA-0015 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Am-Pro VWA-0015 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Am-Pro Protective Services, Inc. VWA-0015 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Am-Pro Protective Services, Inc. Barry Stutts, Complainant v. Am-Pro Protective Agency, Inc., Respondent, OHA Case No. VWA-0015 DECISION DENYING REVIEW OF INITIAL AGENCY DECISION This is a request for review by Complainant Barry Stutts, from the Initial Agency Decision by the Office of Hearings and Appeals ("OHA"), finding that reinstatement of Mr. Stutts as a security guard is a necessary and appropriate action to effect full relief for a retaliatory termination made by the previous security contractor at Forrestal and Germantown, Am-Pro Protective Agency, Inc. Based upon my review of the regulatory language,

210

VWA-0018 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Thomas T. Tiller |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Thomas T. Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Thomas T. Tiller VWA-0018 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Thomas T. Tiller This is a request for review by complainant Thomas T. Tiller of an Initial Agency Decision, issued by the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA), denying the two reprisal complaints that he filed pursuant to 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the regulation establishing the DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program. Mr. Tiller was employed by Wackenhut Services, Inc. (Wackenhut), a DOE contractor that provides paramilitary security support services at DOE's Savannah River Site in Aiken, South Carolina. Deputy Secretary Decision Affirming VWA-0018 Decision and Order More Documents & Publications OHA Whistleblower Cases Archive File VWA-0018 - In the Matter of Thomas T. Tiller

211

P:\DECISION\0026.tee.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

, 2005 , 2005 DECISION AND ORDER OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Case Name: Energy Savings Products, Ltd. Date of Filing: September 28, 2005 Case Number: TEE-0026 This Decision and Order considers an Application for Exception filed by Energy Savings Products, Ltd. (ESP) seeking exception relief from the provisions of 10 C.F.R. Part 430, pertaining to energy conservation standards for central air conditioners and heat pumps (Air Conditioner Standards). ESP is a manufacturer of small duct, high velocity (SDHV) air conditioning equipment. In its exception request, ESP asserts that the firm will suffer a gross inequity, serious hardship and an unfair distribution of burdens if forced to comply with the 13 SEER energy efficiency standard effective

212

P:\DECISION\0024.tee.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2, 2005 2, 2005 DECISION AND ORDER OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Petitioner: Refricenter International Date of Filing: September 14, 2005 Case Numbers: TEE-0024 This Decision and Order considers an Application for Exception filed by Refricenter International (Refricenter), seeking exception relief from the provisions of 10 C.F.R. Part 430, pertaining to energy conservation standards for central air conditioners and heat pumps (Air Conditioner Standards). Refricenter imports and markets air conditioning equipment on the island of Puerto Rico. In its exception request, Refricenter asserts that it will incur a serious hardship, inequity and an unfair distribution of burdens if forced to comply with the 13 SEER energy efficiency standard effective January 2006, 10 C.F.R. § 430.32(c). If Refricenter's exception request were

213

P:\DECISION\0013.tee.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2005 2005 DECISION AND ORDER OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Petitioner: NORDYNE, Inc. Date of Filing: August 27, 2004 Case Numbers: TEE-0013 This Decision and Order considers an Application for Exception filed by NORDYNE, Inc. (NORDYNE), seeking exception relief from the provisions of 10 C.F.R. Part 430, pertaining to energy conservation standards for central air conditioners and heat pumps (Air Conditioner Standards). NORDYNE manufacturers air conditioning and heating equipment for the residential, light commercial and manufactured housing markets. In its exception request, NORDYNE asserts that it will suffer a serious hardship, inequity and an unfair distribution of burdens if forced to comply with the 13 SEER energy efficiency standard effective January 2006, 10 C.F.R. § 430.32(c). If

214

PSH-12-0094 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

94 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 94 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0094 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 6, 2012, a Hearing Officer determined that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not successfully addressed the DOE's security concerns regarding his abuse of alcohol. The Hearing Officer further concluded that the individual's six months of responsible behavior regarding alcohol were insufficient to demonstrate a sustained pattern of responsible use. This was because of the brevity of the period of time involved, the individual's failure to admit that he had a drinking problem, and his failure to take steps to address the problem other than abstinence. The Hearing officer also concluded that

215

PSH-13-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

08 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 08 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On June 6, 2013, a Hearing Officer determined that an individual's security clearance should be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual successfully addressed the DOE's security concerns regarding his alcohol use. Specifically, the Hearing Officer concluded that the individual, who had been diagnosed by a DOE psychiatrist with Alcohol Abuse, achieved adequate evidence of rehabilitation and reformation. In addition, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had satisfied the following mitigating factors as outlined in the Adjudicative Guidelines: (1) the individual acknowledged his alcohol abuse, provided evidence of actions taken to overcome his

216

PSH-13-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On June 6, 2013, a Hearing Officer determined that an individual's security clearance should be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual successfully addressed the DOE's security concerns regarding his alcohol use. Specifically, the Hearing Officer concluded that the individual, who had been diagnosed by a DOE psychiatrist with Alcohol Abuse, achieved adequate evidence of rehabilitation and reformation. In addition, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had satisfied the following mitigating factors as outlined in the Adjudicative Guidelines: (1) the individual acknowledged his alcohol abuse, provided evidence of actions taken to overcome his

217

PSH-12-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PSH-12-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0090 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On December 6, 2012, a Hearing Officer determined that an individual should be granted a security clearance. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had successfully addressed the DOE's security concerns regarding his alcohol consumption. Specifically, the Hearing Officer concluded that the individual's eight months of abstinence and AA attendance, along with the strength of his motivation to stop drinking and his ability to socialize with drinkers without feeling an urge to drink himself, and other factors, were sufficient to demonstrate rehabilitation from Alcohol Abuse. Robert Palmer - Hearing Officer

218

VWA-0012 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Ronny J. Escamilla  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Ronny J. Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Ronny J. Escamilla VWA-0012 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Ronny J. Escamilla United States Department of Energy Ronny J. Escamilla v. Systems Engineering & Management Associates, Inc.; Case No. VWA-0012 Final Decision and Order Issued by the Deputy Secretary of Energy Issued April 18, 1997 This is an appeal by complainant Ronny J. Escamilla from the Initial Agency Decision by the Office of Hearings and Appeals ("OHA'') finding that the complainant, a computer scientist formerly employed by Systems Engineering & Management, Inc. ("SEMA''), a subcontractor of EG&G Rocky Flats, Inc., the Department of Energy ("DOE'') management and operating contractor at its Rocky Flats facility, had failed to establish by a preponderance of the

219

David Ramirez Case No. VWX-0001 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Ramirez Ramirez Case No. VWX-0001 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Supplemental Order Name of Petitioner: David Ramirez Date of Filing: January 17, 1995 Case Number: VWX-0001 On December 2, 1994, the Deputy Secretary of Energy issued a Final Decision and Order in a case involving a "whistleblower" complaint filed by David Ramirez ("Ramirez") under the Department of Energy's Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. David Ramirez, 24 DOE 87,510 (1994). In that Decision, the Deputy Secretary affirmed, and adopted as a Final Agency Decision, an Initial Agency Decision and a Supplemental Order issued by the undersigned Hearing Officer in the Ramirez case. The present Supplemental Order is a final determination of the amount of attorney fees and

220

Deputy Secretary Decision Denying Review of Initial Agency Decicion, January 19, 2000  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Barry Stutts, Complainant v. Am-Pro Protective Agency, Inc., Respondent, OHA Case No. VWA-0015 Barry Stutts, Complainant v. Am-Pro Protective Agency, Inc., Respondent, OHA Case No. VWA-0015 DECISION DENYING REVIEW OF INITIAL AGENCY DECISION This is a request for review by Complainant Barry Stutts, from the Initial Agency Decision by the Office of Hearings and Appeals ("OHA"), finding that reinstatement of Mr. Stutts as a security guard is a necessary and appropriate action to effect full relief for a retaliatory termination made by the previous security contractor at Forrestal and Germantown, Am-Pro Protective Agency, Inc. Based upon my review of the regulatory language, the relevant case law, and the entire record, I conclude that this request should be denied. In his complaint filed with the Office of Contractor Employee Protection ("OCEP"), Mr. Stutts alleged that he had made protected

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "hearing officer decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Summary of Decisions - July 29, 2013 - August 2, 2013 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 29, 2013 - August 2, 2013 July 29, 2013 - August 2, 2013 Summary of Decisions - July 29, 2013 - August 2, 2013 August 2, 2013 - 8:26am Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On July 31, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that a security clearance should not be granted to an individual. The individual disclosed during his background investigation that in 2005-06 he had been charged for battery as a result of a dispute with a neighbor, domestic violence as a result of an altercation with his then-wife, and driving under the influence of alcohol. Beginning in 2007, the individual had separately attended court-mandated domestic violence counseling and alcohol treatment programs. Following the abstinence required by his court-mandated treatment, the individual has consumed

222

Summary of Decisions - July 15, 2013- July 19, 2013 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 15, 2013- July 19, 2013 July 15, 2013- July 19, 2013 Summary of Decisions - July 15, 2013- July 19, 2013 July 19, 2013 - 10:14am Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On July 17, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual should be granted an authorization access. When the individual was 17 years old (2007), he was diagnosed with sudden onset diabetes (Type 1-Insulin Dependent) and with Adjustment Disorder NOS. Three months later, immediately following a traumatic telephone call with his girlfriend, he ingested a handful of over-the-counter medication in a suicide attempt. At that time, he was diagnosed with "Depression NOS." Due to the security concerns raised by this history of treatment for psychological disorders, the individual was referred to a DOE

223

EIS-0487: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

87: Record of Decision EIS-0487: Record of Decision Freeport LNG Liquefaction Project, Brazoria County, Texas DOE Office of Fossil Energy issued a Record of Decision on granting...

224

Hearing Loss  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Earphones Potentially as Dangerous as Noise from Jet Engines, Earphones Potentially as Dangerous as Noise from Jet Engines, Researchers Find Aug. 29, 2012 - Turning the volume up too high on your headphones can damage the coating of nerve cells, leading to temporary deafness, scientists from the University of Leicester have shown for the first time. Earphones or headphones on personal music players can reach noise levels similar to those of jet engines, the researchers said. Noises louder than 110 decibels are known to cause hearing problems such as temporary deafness and tinnitus (ringing in the ears), but the University of Leicester study is the first time the underlying cell damage has been observed. The study has been published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. University of Leicester researcher Dr Martine Hamann of the Department of Cell Physiology and Pharmacology,

225

LWA-0010 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Howard W. Spaletta  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Howard W. Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Howard W. Spaletta LWA-0010 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Howard W. Spaletta This is an appeal by complainant Howard W. Spaletta from the Initial Agency Decision by the Office of Hearings and Appeals ("OHA") finding that the complainant, an engineer formerly employed by EG&G Idaho, Inc. (EG&G), previously the DOE's management and operating contractor at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL), had established by a preponderance of the evidence that he suffered reprisal as a result of his protected safety disclosures, and ordering back pay and other remedial actions. However, OHA declined to grant the complainant certain further relief that he sought, and rejected his claim that his acceptance of an offer of early

226

VWA-0007 and VWA-0008 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of C.  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 and VWA-0008 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter 7 and VWA-0008 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of C. Lawrence Cornett, Maria Elena Torano Associates, Inc. VWA-0007 and VWA-0008 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of C. Lawrence Cornett, Maria Elena Torano Associates, Inc. This is a request for review by Maria Elena Torano Associates, Inc. ("META"), a DOE contractor responsible for reviewing and revising the agency's waste management programmatic environmental impact statement ("PEIS"), of the Initial Agency Decision of the Office of Hearings and Appeals ("OHA") finding that Complainant C. Lawrence Cornett established that he had made protected health and safety disclosures under 10 C.F.R. Part 708 and that these disclosures were a contributing factor in

227

R:\DECISION\0059.VBX  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Westbrook was an appeal to the Director of the Office of Westbrook was an appeal to the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals of an Initial Agency Determination (IAD) of an OHA Hearing Officer. The IAD found that Westbrook was not entitled to relief. Janet L. Westbrook (Case No. VBH- 0059), 28 DOE ¶ 87,018 (2001). Westbrook reversed that determination and granted the Complainant relief. October 3, 2002 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Supplemental Order Name of Case: Janet L. Westbrook Date of Filing: June 17, 2002 Case Number: VBX-0059 Janet Westbrook (Westbrook or Complainant) filed a Complaint of Retaliation alleging that her former employer, UT-Battelle, LLC (Battelle or the Company), the DOE contractor that manages the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (the Laboratory or ORNL), terminated her as

228

P:\DECISION\FIA-12-0032.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

are available on the OHA are available on the OHA website located at http://www.oha.doe.gov . The text of a cited decision may be accessed by entering the case number of the decision in the search engine located at http://www.oha.doe.gov/search.htm. 2/ Ms. Sherriff also filed a similar request for documents relating to her father, Raleigh Cornwell, who also worked at the Paducah Plant. Although ORO processed the two requests separately, Ms. Sherriff's Appeal attempts to combine the two cases, as she is also requesting that documents relating to her father be located and released. For purposes of administrative (continued...) United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the Matter of Patsy Cornwell Sherriff )

229

Hearings | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Hearings Hearings Hearings Security Hearings The DOE has established procedures that govern the resolution of questions concerning the eligibility of individuals who are employed by or applicants for employment with DOE contractors, agents, and DOE access permittees; individuals who are DOE employees or applicants for DOE employment; and other persons designated by the Secretary of Energy for access to classified matter or special nuclear material. (This access authorization is commonly referred to as a security clearance.) These procedures are codified in Subpart A of 10 CFR Part 710. Subpart A provides an opportunity for hearing and administrative review in cases when it is determined that questions concerning an individual's eligibility for access authorization

230

The Effects of Elite Decision Making  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

focuses on two groups of decision makers, candidates running for office and public managers, and the effect of their decisions on the electorate and organization, respectively. The dissertation explores the impact of candidates' decisions regarding...

Johansen, Morgen S.

2010-07-14T23:59:59.000Z

231

LWA-0001- Affirming Decision and Order- In the Matter of Ronald Sorri  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Complainant, Sandia National Laboratories, and L&M Technologies Inc. have agreed, through their counsels, to the dismissal of L&M Technologies Inc. as a party to this proceeding. As the Secretary's designee for the purpose of reviewing an Initial Agency Decision, pursuant to section 708.11, title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, I have approved the dismissal of L&M Technologies Inc. as a party to this proceeding, and hereby affirm the elements of relief ordered by the Office of Hearings and Appeals.

232

DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Appeal Name of Petitioner: Janet L. Westbrook  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9, 2002 9, 2002 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Appeal Name of Petitioner: Janet L. Westbrook Date of Filing: January 17, 2002 Case Number: VBA-0059 This Decision considers an Appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued on December 21, 2001, involving a Complaint filed by Janet L. Westbrook (Westbrook or the Complainant) under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. In her Complaint, Westbrook claims that her former employer, UT-Battelle, LLC (Battelle or the Company), the DOE contractor that manages the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (the Laboratory), terminated her as part of a reduction in force (RIF) as a retaliation for making disclosures that are protected under Part 708. In the IAD, however, the Hearing Officer determined that Battelle had shown that it would have terminated the

233

Background: Today's Solyndra Solar Hearing | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Background: Today's Solyndra Solar Hearing Background: Today's Solyndra Solar Hearing Background: Today's Solyndra Solar Hearing September 14, 2011 - 12:04am Addthis Dan Leistikow Dan Leistikow Former Director, Office of Public Affairs This morning, the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations is holding a hearing to discuss Solyndra Solar, the California-based solar manufacturer that declared bankruptcy last week. Jonathan Silver, Executive Director of the Department's Loan Programs Office, will be testifying. We've posted Jonathan's written testimony online. The testimony is very thorough and provides a good explanation of the loan process and the extensive reviews and analysis conducted by the Department between 2006 and 2009. He also explains the remarkable changes in the solar market since

234

EIS-0372: Notice of Public Hearings | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Public Hearings Public Hearings EIS-0372: Notice of Public Hearings Proposed Bangor Hydro-Electric Company (BHE) Northeast Reliability Interconnect The Department of Energy (DOE) announces two public hearings on the ''Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Bangor Hydro-Electric Company (BHE) Northeast Reliability Interconnect'' (DOE/EIS-0372). Notice of Public Hearings for the Proposed Bangor Hydro-Electric Company (BHE) Northeast Reliability Inteconnect (DOE/EIS-0372) (September 2005 - 70 FR 53786) More Documents & Publications EIS-0372: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and to Conduct Public Scoping Meetings and Notice of Floodplain and Wetlands Involvement PP-89-1 Bangor Hydro-Electric Company EIS-0372: Record of Decision and Floodplain Statement of Findings

235

Microsoft Word - PSH-12-0131  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

) Case No.: PSH-12-0131 ) ) Issued: March 5, 2013 Hearing Officer Decision Steven L. Fine, Hearing...

236

Dog Teeth and Hearing  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Dog Teeth and Hearing Dog Teeth and Hearing Name: Chad Status: other Grade: 9-12 Location: Outside U.S. Country: Canada Date: Spring 2011 Question: Can a bad tooth problem, infection (we've had several teeth pulled) cause a problem with deafness in a dog ? We have a snoodle 14 years old, but still in other wise good health. Replies: Hi Chad, Sorry to hear about Snoodle's hearing and dental problems. Deafness in an older dog is not uncommon and it would not likely be due to any tooth related problems. A severe tooth infection that extends or penetrates through the bone into the ear canal would be very rare and you would see very obvious symptoms in the ear. If your vet has examined Snoodle and there were no obvious problems related to the ear canal, then I would attribute the hearing loss to an age related change. I hope this helps.

237

Noise and Hearing Conservation  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Hearing Conservation Hearing Conservation Mary L. Doyle NOISE & HEARING CONSERVATION Mary L. Doyle, MPH, RN, COHN-S/CM DOE Headquarters January 16, 2002 1.0.1.~ CAUSES OF HEARING LOSS * Congenital * Environmental Exposures * Hereditary * Illness *Injury * Noise * Occupational * Non-Occupational * Sociacusis S.O.S. eon.ua.nt. OTOTOXIC DRUGS Can Affect Cochlea or Vestibular System * Aminoglycoside Antibiotics * Diuretics * Cancer Chemotherapy * Aspirin * Quinines * Usually Permanent * Consider Benefit-Risk Ratio S.O.S. eon.ua.nts HEARING * Modification of Acoustic Wave by Outer Ear * Conversion of Modified Acoustic Wave to Vibration of Eardrum * Middle Ear * Inner Ear * Transformation of Mechanical Movement to Nerve Impulses S.O.S. CoMubRis OTOTOXIC INDUSTRIAL

238

Summary of Decisions - July 23 - July 27, 2012 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 - July 27, 2012 3 - July 27, 2012 Summary of Decisions - July 23 - July 27, 2012 August 27, 2012 - 3:05pm Addthis Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) On July 27, 2012, a Hearing Officer issued a decision concluding that the DOE should not grantan individual an access authorization. A DOE-consultant psychologist had found that theindividual had antisocial tendencies, a mental condition that can affect judgment and reliability.In addition, the individual had raised security concerns by omitting or misrepresentingderogatory information on his Questionnaire for National Security Positions (QNSP) and at hisPersonnel Security Interview (PSI). Finally, the individual had a police record of chargesbeginning when he was a juvenile that indicated that he may not be reliable and trustworthy.

239

Fossil Energy FY 2014 Appropriations Hearing | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FY 2014 Appropriations Hearing FY 2014 Appropriations Hearing Fossil Energy FY 2014 Appropriations Hearing March 14, 2013 - 1:36pm Addthis Statement of Christopher Smith, Acting Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy before the House Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development. Mr. Chairman, Madam Ranking Member, and Members of the Committee, it is my pleasure to appear before you today to discuss the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Fossil Energy's (FE) programs. Our fossil fuel resources are essential to the Nation's security and economic prosperity. The Office of Fossil Energy's primary mission is to ensure that the U.S. can continue to utilize those traditional fuel sources for clean, affordable, reliable energy. Technology development is critical to this mission. FE's Research and Development (FER&D) program

240

DS-0001 Deputy Secretary Decision  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

RONALD A. SORRI, Complainant v. L&M TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES, Respondents. OHA Case No. LWA-0001 FINAL DECISION AND ORDER On December 16, 1993, the Office...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "hearing officer decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Record of Decision, Shutdown of the River Water System at the Savannah River Site, Savannah River Operations Office, Aiken, South Carolina  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 18 / Wednesday, January 28, 1998 / Notices have to be addressed during dismantlement. The no action alternative would involve keeping the defueled S3G and D1G Prototype reactor plants in protective storage indefinitely. Since there is some residual radioactivity with long half-lives, such as nickel-59, in the defueled reactor plant, this alternative would leave some radioactivity at the Kesselring Site indefinitely. The Naval Reactors Program distributed the Draft Environmental Impact Statement on the Disposal of the S3G and D1G Prototype Reactor Plants in July 1997. Comments from 14 individuals and agencies were received in either oral or written statements at a public hearing or in comment letters. Approximately one-third of the commenters expressed a preference for

242

Office: ITO PE/Project  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Projection wall interspersed with low-cost, unobtrusive cameras Seeing PeopleHearing People Concept - Light1 DARPA Office: ITO PE/Project: Pgm No.: Pgm Mgr.: Mills/Swinson PAD No.: Smart Spaces Personal Information Projection · Develop techniques for projecting personal information from cyberspace into smart

Mills, Kevin

243

Audiometry (hearing test)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The audiogram is an evaluation of how well an individual can hear. Sounds are presented to the individual through earphones during the test. These sounds are presented at different levels of frequency and intensity. The human ear responds to the frequency or pitch of a sound and the intensity or loudness of the sound.

244

WorkLife Office Choosing Child Care  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

and Communication....................................................... 22 Recycled ResourcesWorkLife Office Choosing Child Care Resources for Making Child Care Decisions WorkLife Office 3160 an Employer ............................. 14 IV. CHILD CARE RESOURCES Child Care Drop

Straight, Aaron

245

Office of Nuclear Safety | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

and Security Officer regarding concurrence in the final decision to startup or restart a nuclear facility. Serves as the Standards Executive for the Department of Energy and...

246

PSH-13-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PSH-13-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing DOE should not grant an individual access authorization. As security concerns under 10 CFR Part 710, a Local Security Office (LSO) cited the individual's history of criminal conduct, financial problems, and past use of alcohol habitually to excess. The LSO also cited the report of a DOE Psychologist, in which he identified the individual's lack of control over his spending and use of alcohol as a mental condition that causes a significant defect in his judgment and reliability. The Hearing Officer found that (1) the individual had not resolved the concerns raised by his problematic use of alcohol, as he had received no treatment in the six

247

PSH-13-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing DOE should not grant an individual access authorization. As security concerns under 10 CFR Part 710, a Local Security Office (LSO) cited the individual's history of criminal conduct, financial problems, and past use of alcohol habitually to excess. The LSO also cited the report of a DOE Psychologist, in which he identified the individual's lack of control over his spending and use of alcohol as a mental condition that causes a significant defect in his judgment and reliability. The Hearing Officer found that (1) the individual had not resolved the concerns raised by his problematic use of alcohol, as he had received no treatment in the six months since being arrested for DWI, and had previously relapsed after

248

Amended Record of Decision; Savannah River Site Waste Management, Savannah River Operations Office, Aiken, South Carolina (DOE/EIS-0217)(6/28/01)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

431 431 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 125 / Thursday, June 28, 2001 / Notices Avenue, SW., Room 4050, Regional Office Building 3, Washington, DC 20202-4651. Requests may also be electronically mailed to the internet address OCIO_IMG_Issues@ed.gov or faxed to 202-708-9346. Please specify the complete title of the information collection when making your request. Comments regarding burden and/or the collection activity requirements should be directed to Joseph Schubart at (202) 708-9266 or via his internet address Joe.Schubart@ed.gov. Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877- 8339. [FR Doc. 01-16231 Filed 6-27-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000-01-U DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION National Board of the Fund for the

249

DECISION AND ORDER  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

, 2004 , 2004 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Decision of the Director Name of Petitioner: Charles L. Evans Date of Filing: May 17, 2004 Case Number: TBU-0026 Charles Evans, a former employee of Fluor Hanford Inc. (Fluor), a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor, appeals the DOE Richland Operations Office=s (Richland) dismissal of the whistleblower complaint he filed against Fluor under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program. I. BACKGROUND A. The DOE=s Contractor Employee Protection Program The DOE=s Contractor Employee Protection Program was established to safeguard Apublic and employee health and safety; ensur[e] compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations; and prevent[] fraud, mismanagement, waste and abuse@ at DOE=s government-owned, contractor-operated facilities. 57 Fed. Reg.

250

STUDENT HEARING BOARD 20132014 APPLICATION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UMBC STUDENT HEARING BOARD 2013­2014 APPLICATION INTEGRITY,CIVILITY,&CONDUCT:FOSTERINGASAFECAMPUSCOMMUNITY #12;UMBC STUDENT HEARING BOARD I 2013­2014 APPLICATION To serve the UMBC community and the individual student by specifying behavioral standards, and by establishing a fair and efficient process

Maryland, Baltimore County, University of

251

STUDENT HEARING BOARD 20122013 APPLICATION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UMBC STUDENT HEARING BOARD 2012­2013 APPLICATION INTEGRITY,CIVILITY,&CONDUCT:FOSTERINGASAFECAMPUSCOMMUNITY #12;UMBC STUDENT HEARING BOARD I 2012­2013 APPLICATION To serve the UMBC community and the individual student by specifying behavioral standards, and by establishing a fair and efficient process

Maryland, Baltimore County, University of

252

Summary of Decisions - August 11, 2014 - August 15, 2014 | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Decision and Order concerning a Freedom of Information Act Appeal (FOIA) filed by Tim Hadley (Appellant) of a determination issued by the DOE Office of Information Resources...

253

Participation in crisis decision making  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

that included: departmental secretaries, under secretaries, military officers, and presidential staff. Actions that these indi- viduals pursued that were classified as participation in crisis decision making included: meeting attendance, presenting policy... positions, presenting alternative courses of action, and informing other decision makers of the nature oi a crisis. The data suggest that various patterns of participation occur in different types of crises, and that actors may tend to participate more...

Marsico, Dale Joseph

1973-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

254

With the support of the Advanced Decision Architectures Collaborative Technology Alliance sponsored by the U.S. Army Research Laboratory (DAAD19-01-2-0009) and the Office of Naval Research  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

economic decision making. Economic decision making should be modeled as a learning process, involving more in human-like behavior representation, they have rarely been used to study economic decision making decision situations, like economic settings. This chapter will demonstrate the potential of ACT-R to model

255

IIT Office of General Counsel Education Program  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

IIT Office of General Counsel Education Program Issues Involving Disabled Students #12;Introduction person" in the general population, e.g., walking, talking, bathing, seeing, hearing, learning? #12 are essential to the program. #12;Reasonable accommodation. Auxiliary aids: taped texts interpreters readers

Heller, Barbara

256

PSH-12-0037 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

37 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 37 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0037 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor in a position that requires a DOE security clearance. Based upon the receipt of derogatory information relating to an unpaid debt, the Local Security Office (LSO) called the Individual in for a Personnel Security Interview (PSI). DOE Ex. 7. After the PSI, the LSO informed the Individual that unresolved derogatory information created a substantial doubt concerning his eligibility for access authorization. Notification Letter dated March 5, 2012; DOE Ex. 1; 10 C.F.R. § 710.8(l) (Criterion L). PSH-12-0037.pdf More Documents & Publications PSH-12-0069 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing

257

PSH-11-0026 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1-0026 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1-0026 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0026 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual works for a DOE contractor and was granted a DOE access authorization in 2007 after a Local Security Office (LSO) mitigated some derogatory information, including concerns about the individual's finances. Issues regarding the individual's finances surfaced again in 2010. After two Personnel Security Interviews, one in 2010 and the other in 2011, failed to resolve the derogatory information regarding the individual's finances, the LSO suspended the individual's access authorization and sought permission to initiate administrative review proceedings Affirmed (OS November 9, 2012) PSH-11-0026.pdf More Documents & Publications PSH-12-0121 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing

258

PSH-12-0050 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-0050 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2-0050 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0050 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual's present employer, a DOE contractor, has requested a DOE access authorization for the individual. The individual completed and submitted an Electronic Questionnaire for Investigations Processing (QNSP) in November 2011. DOE Exhibit 8. Based on issues contained in the individual's security file, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) with the individual in January 2012. DOE Exhibit 9. In March 2012, a DOE-consultant Psychologist evaluated the individual, and memorialized his findings in a Psychological Assessment Report (the Report). PSH-12-0050.pdf More Documents & Publications PSH-11-0021 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing

259

PSH-11-0024 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

24 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 24 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0024 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an applicant for a DOE security clearance. In March 2011, as part of a background investigation, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address his alcohol use. In addition to the PSI, the LSO requested the individual's medical records and recommended a psychiatric evaluation of the individual by a DOE consultant psychiatrist (DOE psychiatrist). The DOE psychiatrist examined the individual in August 2011 and memorialized his findings in a report (Psychiatric Report). PSH-11-0024.pdf More Documents & Publications TSO-1102 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1013 - In the Matter of Personnel Security

260

PSH-11-0001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

01 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 01 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a DOE contractor and has held a DOE access authorization for anumber of years. Exhibit (Ex.) 18 at 8. During the period August 2009 through November 2009,the Individual went to his office in a secured building late at night during non-duty hours. Ex. 15.Further, the Individual had made several unauthorized purchases from his government-issuedcredit card during that period. Ex. 15. In explaining these events to his superiors, the Individual asserted that the incidents were a result of his experiencing a manic episode of his Bipolar Disorder. Ex. 15 at 7. This disclosure prompted the Local Security Office (LSO) to conduct aJanuary 2010 Personnel Security Interview (2010 PSI) with the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "hearing officer decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

TSO-1108 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TSO-1108 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1108 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1108 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a DOE contractor and held an access authorization until it was recently suspended. During a routine reinvestigation of the individual, he informed an Office of Personnel Management (OPM) investigator on February 16, 2011, that he had not filed federal or state income tax returns for several years. Exhibit 6 at 13. A Local Security Office (LSO) summoned the individual for an interview (PSI) with a personnel security specialist on June 23, 2011. Exhibit 9. The LSO ultimately determined that derogatory information existed that cast into doubt the individual's eligibility for access authorization. The LSO informed the individual of this determination in a letter that set forth

262

PSH-12-0027 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

27 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 27 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0027 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing In October 2011, pursuant to an investigation, the Local Security Office obtained the Individual's credit report. The credit report indicated that the Individual had a number of accounts either in collection or which were charged off. Exhibit (Ex.) 13 at 1-6. Consequently, the DOE facility's Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a personnel security interview (PSI) with the Individual in January 2012. Ex. 19. The 2012 PSI failed to resolve the security concerns due to the Individual's excessive indebtedness. Consequently, the LSO, in a February 2012 notification letter (Notification Letter) informed the Individual as to the derogatory information that

263

PSH-12-0010 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

10 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 10 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0010 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual works for a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor and is an applicant for DOE access authorization. In August 2010, the individual completed a Questionnaire for National Security Positions (QNSP) and was subject to an Office of Personnel Management (OPM) background investigation. He provided information to the Local Security Office (LSO) during a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) conducted in March 2011 that was inconsistent with answers he provided on his QNSP and during his OPM investigation, revealing that he had been hospitalized in January 2010 for alcohol abuse, treatment of prescription drug addiction and depression. Because the LSO could not resolve these discrepancies and the concerns

264

PSH-12-0065 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-0065 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2-0065 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0065 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is a contractor employee at a DOE facility. Exhibit (Ex.) 10 at 3. The Local Security Office (LSO) discovered that the Individual failed to list a 2004 Driving Under the Influence (DUI) arrest in a Questionnaire for National Security Positions form completed in October 2011. Ex. 10 at 10. The Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a personnel security interview with the Individual in January 2012 (2012 PSI) and, due to concerns arising from the Individual's admission of excessive alcohol use in the 2012 PSI, referred him for an examination by a DOE-contractor psychologist (DOE Psychologist). Ex. 12; Ex. 8 at 1. Because neither the

265

P:\DECISION\0059.tee.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 U.S.C. § 772(b); 42 U.S.C. § 7135(b). 5 U.S.C. § 772(b); 42 U.S.C. § 7135(b). 2 See H.R. Rep. No. 373, 96th Cong., 1st Sess., reprinted in 1979 U.S. Code Cong. & Admin. News 1764, 1781 (H.R. Report 373). May 15, 2009 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Application for Exception Name of Case: Sauder Fuel Inc. Date of Filing: April 28, 2009 Case No.: TEE-0059 On April 28, 2009, Sauder Fuel Inc. (Sauder), filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). The firm requests that it be relieved of the requirement to prepare and file the Energy Information Administration (EIA) Form EIA-782B, entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report." As explained

266

ACADEMIC HONOR POLICY HEARING REFERRAL  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Development and Advancement 115 Westcott--Mail Code 1480 Instructors should contact the Office of Faculty

Sura, Philip

267

R:\DECISION\0007.TBU  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

, 2003 , 2003 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Case: Gary Vander Boegh Date of Filing: May 27, 2003 Case Number: TBU-0007 Gary Vander Boegh (the Complainant), an employee of WESKEM LLC (WESKEM), appeals the dismissal of his complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. WESKEM is a subcontractor of Bechtel Jacobs Company LLC (BJC), the management and integration contractor for the C-746-U Landfill at the DOE's Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant located in Paducah, Kentucky. On April 21, 2003, the Manager of Diversity Programs and Employee Concerns (Manager) at the DOE Oak Ridge Operations Office (DOE/OR) dismissed the Vander Boegh complaint. As explained below, I

268

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Decision Critical Technology Element U.S. Department of Defense U.S. Department of Energy Documented Safety Analysis U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Environmental...

269

Microsoft Word - 1116.tso.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: September 23, 2011 ) ) Case No.: TSO-1116 ) ___________________________________ ) Issued: March 23, 2012 _______________ Hearing Officer Decision _______________ Valerie Vance Adeyeye, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual@) to hold an access authorization under the regulations set forth at 10

270

TBA-0042- In the Matter of Curtis Hall  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This Decision considers two Appeals of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued on March 15, 2007, by a Hearing Officer in the Department of Energys (DOE) Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA). The...

271

LWX-0013- In the Matter of David Ramirez  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This Decision supplements an Initial Agency Decision, dated March17, 1994, issued by the undersigned Hearing Officer of the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy in a...

272

Badge Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Badge Office Badge Office Badge Office The central point where badges are issued to employees and official visitors. Contact Badge Office (505) 667-6901 Email Badge Office location As the central point where badges are issued to employees and official visitors, the Badge Office is located on the second floor of the Otowi Building (TA-3, Bldg. 261). Badge Office map Printable 2-page map to the Badge Office (pdf) More maps and directions Badge Office hours Monday-Friday: 7:30 am - 4 pm Wednesday: Closed 11 am - 12:30 pm Badge requirements US citizen employees must present a photo ID and proof of US citizenship. See Security Smart on Proof of United States Citizenship for the Badge Office (pdf). Foreign national guests and employees must have an approved visit and present a valid passport and documentation of US legal status and work

273

Effects of Weapon Noise on Hearing  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...In military spheres, the need for prevention of weapon noise-induced hearing loss is receiving ever-...

A. Dancer; R. Franke

1986-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

274

Decision Theory and Real Decisions:  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Decision theory has been extremely successful in various ways. As a theory per se..., it has provided interesting research opportunities stemming from an elegant central core. It has served as a basis for identif...

Kenneth R. MacCrimmon

1999-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

275

The Office of Health, Safety and Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Public Meetings and Hearings Public Meetings and Hearings JUMP TO: 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 2013 December 10, 2013, Safety in Design, Operations, and Emergency Preparedness at the Y-12 National Security Complex. Agenda [PDF] Federal Register Notice of Public Meeting Changes (new time and date) [PDF] Notice of Public Meeting (for October 22, 2013) [PDF] March 14, 2013, Board Public Meeting and Hearing on Safety Culture, Emergency Preparedness, and Nuclear Explosive Operations at Pantex. Federal Register Notice [PDF] Notice of Public Meeting Changes [PDF] Agenda [PDF] Written Statement of Mr. Daniel Ogg, Group Lead for Nuclear Weapon Programs, DNFSB [PDF] Written Statement of Mr. Glenn Podonsky, Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer [PDF]

276

HEARING CONSERVATION TABLE OF CONTENTS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

.10, "Recording Criteria for Cases Involving Occupational Hearing Loss". ANSI S1.11-1971 "Specification for Octave, Half-Octave, and Third-Octave Band Filter Sets" ANSI S1.25-1978 "Specification for Personal Noise Dosimeters" ANSI S1.4-1971 "Specification for Sound Level Meters" ANSI S3.6-1969 "Specifications

Holland, Jeffrey

277

Campus Sustainability Office Campus Planning Office  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Campus Sustainability Office (CSO) Campus Planning Office (CPO) Campus Sustainability Manager (Molly Bressers) Campus Sustainability Office and Campus Planning Office September 2014 Student Employee

Caughman, John

278

Accommodations for Hearing Disabilities | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Hearing Disabilities Hearing Disabilities Accommodations for Hearing Disabilities Although the general term "hearing impaired" is being used to include both deaf and hard of hearing individuals, the needs of these two groups may vary greatly. In general, people who are deaf depend more upon visual skills for communication and information in their environment while hard of hearing people enhance their usable hearing while relying on auditory input more than visual input. This general difference drives many of the concerns and needs mentioned in this section. It is key that the individual participate in the process of identifying the accommodation solution to ensure it is suitable for the individual and their needs. Visual Redundancy on Computers - Ensure that important information

279

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

her pay is less than that of another worker and her workload is greater are too vague to rise to the level of a Part 708 retaliation. There is no allegation or evidence that the...

280

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Part 708, a complainant is not required to wait until he has "official" evidence in order to file a complaint of retaliation. The investigator noted that the complaint must be...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "hearing officer decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

SECRETARY'S OFFICE  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

SECRETARY'S OFFICE ... This is especially true with respect to reference hooks and magazines in the field of science. ...

1958-09-15T23:59:59.000Z

282

PSH-14-0100- In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On February 4, 2015, an OHA Administrative Judge (AJ) issued a Decision in which he concluded that the DOE should not restore an individuals access authorization. A DOE Operations Office referred...

283

PSH-12-0136 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PSH-12-0136 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0136 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0136 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a DOE contractor and holds a suspended access authorization. In June 2012, the individual was arrested and charged with Aggravated Driving While Intoxicated (DWI). Exhibits 7, 8. Because of the concern this arrest raised, a Local Security Office (LSO) summoned the individual for an interview (PSI) with a personnel security specialist on July 30, 2012. Exhibit 16 (PSI Transcript). After the PSI, the LSO referred the individual to a local psychologist (hereinafter referred to as "the DOE Psychologist") for an agency-sponsored evaluation. The DOE Psychologist prepared a written report, setting forth the results of that

284

PSH-11-0025 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

25 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 25 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0025 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual currently is employed by a DOE contractor, and that contractor has requested that he receive a DOE security clearance. Based on issues contained in the individual's security file, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview with the individual in August 2011 (the 2011 PSI, DOE Ex. 8). In September 2011, a DOE-consultant psychologist (the DOE-consultant Psychologist) evaluated the individual, and memorialized her findings in a Psychological Evaluation Report (the Report, DOE Ex. 6). In October 2011, the LSO issued a Notification Letter to the individual, together with a Summary of Security Concerns (Enclosure 2) setting forth the information that created a

285

PSH-12-0014 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 4 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0014 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual, a 48-year-old employee of a DOE contractor, is an applicant for DOE access authorization. DOE Ex. 3. During the application process, the Individual completed a Questionnaire for National Security Positions (QNSP) in May 2011, and participated in an August 2011 Personnel Security Interview (PSI). DOE Exs. 8, 9. After the PSI, the local security office (LSO) referred the Individual to a DOE consultant-psychiatrist ("the DOE psychiatrist") for an evaluation. The DOE psychiatrist evaluated the Individual in September 2011 and issued a report. DOE Exs. 6, 7. After reviewing the Individual's personnel security file, the LSO informed the

286

PSH-12-0013 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-0013 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2-0013 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0013 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual works for a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor and holds a DOE access authorization, now in suspension. In 2007 through 2009, the individual provided inconsistent information to the Local Security Office (LSO) concerning his use of alcohol and failed to report an arrest that occurred in 2003. Because the LSO could not resolve these discrepancies and the reporting failure to its satisfaction, it determined that derogatory information existed that cast into doubt the individual's eligibility for access authorization. The LSO informed the individual of this determination in a Notification Letter that set forth the DOE's security concerns and

287

PSH-12-0035 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

35 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 35 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0035 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is employed in a position that requires him to maintain a DOE access authorization, which he had been granted. See Ex. 3 at 1. On an August 2011 Questionnaire for National Security Positions (QNSP), the individual disclosed a June 2007 vehicle repossession and a March 2010 wage garnishment for $2,000 that stemmed from a debt to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Ex. 4 at 8. He also disclosed a 2011 citation for No Proof of Registration. Id. at 7. In December 2011, the local security office (LSO) invited the individual to a personnel security interview (PSI) to explain his finances and his disclosures. PSH-12-0035.pdf More Documents & Publications

288

TSO-1009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TSO-1009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is employed at a Department of Energy (DOE) facility where his work requires him to have an access authorization. In September 2010, as part of a background investigation, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address the individual's alcohol use. In addition to the PSI, the LSO requested the individual's medical records and recommended a psychiatric evaluation of the individual. In November 2010, a DOE consultant psychiatrist (DOE psychiatrist) conducted a forensic psychiatric examination and concluded that the individual met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental

289

PSH-12-0021 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

21 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 21 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0021 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is a contractor employee at a DOE facility. The Local Security Office (LSO) received information that the Individual had not filed a state income tax return for the year 2007. Exhibit (Ex.) 3 at 1. Consequently, LSO conducted a personnel security interview (PSI) with the Individual in October 2011. Ex. 7. Because the 2011 PSI failed to resolve the security concerns raised by the Individual's failure to file tax returns, the LSO informed the Individual, in a February 2012 notification letter (Notification Letter), that derogatory information existed which raised security concerns under 10 C.F.R. § 710.8 (l) (Criterion L) and that her security clearance was suspended. Ex. 1. The Notification Letter

290

PSH-12-0014 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

14 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 14 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0014 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual, a 48-year-old employee of a DOE contractor, is an applicant for DOE access authorization. DOE Ex. 3. During the application process, the Individual completed a Questionnaire for National Security Positions (QNSP) in May 2011, and participated in an August 2011 Personnel Security Interview (PSI). DOE Exs. 8, 9. After the PSI, the local security office (LSO) referred the Individual to a DOE consultant-psychiatrist ("the DOE psychiatrist") for an evaluation. The DOE psychiatrist evaluated the Individual in September 2011 and issued a report. DOE Exs. 6, 7. After reviewing the Individual's personnel security file, the LSO informed the

291

PSH-12-0020 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

20 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 20 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0020 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is employed by a DOE contractor, and has held a DOE access authorization for several years. Based on financial issues contained in the individual's security file, the Local Security Office (LSO) issued letters of interrogatory (LOI) to the individual in August 2009 and June 2011. DOE Exs. 18 and 16. The LSO also conducted Personnel Security Interviews (PSIs) with the individual in December 2010, November 2011 and December 2011. DOE Exs. 20, 21 and 22. In January 2012, the LSO issued the individual a Notification Letter, together with a Summary of Security Concerns (Enclosure 2) setting forth the information that created a substantial doubt about his eligibility to hold a DOE security clearance.

292

PSH-12-0025 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

25 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 25 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0025 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a DOE contractor and an applicant for an access authorization. To address concerns related to the individual's past use of alcohol and marijuana, other prior criminal conduct, and certain discrepancies in the record regarding the individual's conduct, a Local Security Office (LSO) summoned the individual for an interview (PSI) with a personnel security specialist on August 29, 2011. Exhibit 10. After the PSI, the LSO determined that derogatory information existed that cast into doubt the individual's eligibility for access authorization. The LSO informed the individual of this determination in a letter that set forth

293

TSO-1102 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TSO-1102 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1102 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1102 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an applicant for a DOE security clearance. In March 2011, as part of a background investigation, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address her alcohol use. In addition to the PSI, the LSO requested the individual's medical records and recommended a psychiatric evaluation of the individual by a DOE consultant psychiatrist (DOE psychiatrist). The DOE psychiatrist examined the individual in April 2011 and memorialized his findings in a report (Psychiatric Report). According to the DOE psychiatrist, the individual suffers from Alcohol Dependence. tso1102.pdf More Documents & Publications

294

PSH-11-0036 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1-0036 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1-0036 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0036 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a DOE contractor and has held an access authorization for several years. DOE Exhibit (Ex.) 6 at 1. Pursuant to an investigation, it was discovered that the Individual, for a second period of time, had not filed state or federal tax returns. Ex. 4 at 1-2. This discovery prompted the Local Security Office (LSO) to conduct a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) with the Individual in October 2011. Ex. 5. After conducting the October 2011 PSI with the Individual, the LSO informed the Individual in a November 2011 notification letter (Notification Letter) that derogatory information existed that raised security concerns under 10

295

TSO-1116 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TSO-1116 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1116 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1116 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor who has held a security clearance for several years. During a routine reinvestigation, the local security office (LSO) discovered that the individual had not filed federal taxes for the tax years 2008 and 2009. In July 2011, the LSO interviewed the individual during a Personnel Security Interview (PSI), but that interview did not resolve the security concerns. The LSO suspended his clearance and, in August 2011, the LSO informed the individual that it had received derogatory information that created a doubt regarding his continued eligibility for access authorization. See

296

TSO-1104 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TSO-1104 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1104 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1104 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is employed by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor, and was granted a security clearance in connection with that employment. During the process of applying for a higherlevel security clearance, the individual provided information to the DOE that is inconsistent with information that he previously provided. Because these inconsistencies raised security concerns, the local security office (LSO) summoned the individual for an interview with a personnel security specialist in March 2011. After this Personnel Security Interview (PSI), the LSO referred the individual to a local psychiatrist (hereinafter referred to as "the DOE

297

PSH-12-0003 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0003 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing In September 2011, the Individual, a security clearance holder, was arrested for Driving While Intoxicated (DWI) and subsequently reported the arrest to the Local Security Office (LSO) at the DOE Facility where he worked. DOE Exhibit (Ex.) 19. Neither a September 2011 personnel security interview (PSI) nor a DOE-Contractor Psychologist's (DOE Psychologist) examination and evaluative report of the Individual resolved the security concerns raised by his 2011 DWI arrest. Consequently, the LSO informed the Individual, in a January 2011 notification letter (Notification Letter), that derogatory information existed which raised security concerns under 10

298

TSO-1002 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TSO-1002 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1002 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1002 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual held a security clearance from 1990 until 2002 while working for government contractors and the federal government. In 2010, his present employer, a DOE contractor, requested DOE access authorization for the individual. Based on issues contained in the individual's security file, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview with the individual in September 2010 (the 2010 PSI, DOE Ex. 10). In November 2010, a DOE-consultant Psychiatrist evaluated the individual, and memorialized her findings in a Report of Psychiatric Evaluation (the 2010 Report, DOE Ex. 4). In December 2010, the LSO issued a Notification Letter

299

PSH-11-0010 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1-0010 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1-0010 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0010 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a DOE contractor and has held a DOE access authorization for several years. DOE Exhibit (Ex.) 13 at 2. In June 2011, the Individual was cited for Disorderly and Lewd/Immoral Indecent Conduct (Disorderly Conduct). Ex. 9 at 2; Ex. 8 at 1. This disclosure prompted the Local Security Office to conduct a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) with the Individual in July 2011 (07/2011 PSI). Ex. 14. After the PSI, the LSO referred the Individual to a DOE consultant-psychologist ("the DOE Psychologist") for an evaluation. The DOE Psychologist evaluated the Individual in August 2011 and issued an evaluative report concerning the

300

PSH-11-0039 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1-0039 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1-0039 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0039 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a DOE contractor and holds a suspended access authorization. On September 8, 2011, the individual notified the DOE that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) began garnishing his wages in August 2011, due to his failure to file a 2006 federal tax return. Exhibit 7. A Local Security Office (LSO) summoned the individual for an interview (PSI) with a personnel security specialist on September 28, 2011. Exhibit 7. After the PSI, the LSO determined that derogatory information existed that cast into doubt the individual's eligibility for access authorization. The LSO informed the individual of this determination in a letter that set forth the DOE's security concerns and the reasons for

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "hearing officer decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

PSH-12-0016 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0016 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The administrative review proceeding began with the issuance of a Notification Letter to the Individual. See 10 C.F.R. § 710.21. The letter informed the Individual that information in the possession of the DOE created a substantial doubt concerning his eligibility for a security clearance. Specifically, the Local Security Office (LSO) stated that the Individual had: (1) been diagnosed by a psychologist as suffering from Impulse-Control Disorder, an illness or mental condition of a nature which causes, or may cause, a significant defect in judgment or reliability; and (2) engaged in unusual conduct which brought his honesty, trustworthiness, and reliability into question by viewing pornography at work, providing

302

PSH-12-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is employed by a DOE contractor, and has held a DOE access authorization for several years. In late September 2011, the individual was arrested and charged with Careless Driving and with Aggravated Driving While Intoxicated (Aggravated DWI). DOE Ex. 6. When he reported these charges to his Local Security Office (LSO), the LSO conducted a Personnel Security Interview (2011 PSI) with the individual in October 2011. 2011 PSI, DOE Ex. 9. In November 2011, a DOE-consultant psychiatrist evaluated the individual, and memorialized his findings in a Report of Psychiatric Examination (the Report, DOE Ex. 4). PSH-12-0008.pdf More Documents & Publications

303

TSO-1106 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TSO-1106 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1106 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1106 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is an applicant for a DOE access authorization in connection with his employment with a DOE contractor. DOE Ex. 3. During the application process, the Individual completed a Questionnaire for National Security Positions (QNSP) in June 2010, and participated in an October 2010 Personnel Security Interview (PSI). DOE Exs. 7, 8. After the PSI, the local security office (LSO) referred the Individual to a DOE consultant-psychologist ("the DOE psychologist") for an evaluation. The DOE psychologist evaluated the Individual in February 2011 and issued a report. DOE Ex. 10. After reviewing the Individual's personnel security file, the LSO informed the Individual in a June 2011 Notification Letter

304

PSH-11-0037 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1-0037 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1-0037 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0037 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing This case involves an Individual with a pattern of failing to meet his financial obligations dating back to 1993. A Local Security Office (LSO) has been monitoring the Individual's financial situation since his original application for a security clearance in 2000. In 2006, the LSO received information indicating that the Individual had a large number of delinquent debts. The LSO subsequently conducted a series of five Personal Security Interviews (PSI) of the Individual, the most recent on September 29, 2011. Unable to resolve the security concerns raised by the Individual's continuing financial issues, and by the sometimes inconsistent and contradictory information provided by the Individual, the

305

PSH-11-0030 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1-0030 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1-0030 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0030 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a DOE contractor and an applicant for an access authorization. On a Questionnaire for National Security Positions (QNSP), the individual disclosed that he had been charged with sexual penetration of a minor in 2003 and possession of marijuana in 1997. Exhibit 9. A Local Security Office (LSO) summoned the individual for an interview (PSI) with a personnel security specialist on April 6, 2011. Exhibit 10. After the PSI, the LSO referred the individual to a local psychiatrist (hereinafter referred to as "the DOE psychiatrist") for an agency-sponsored evaluation. The DOE psychiatrist prepared a written report, setting forth the results of that evaluation, and sent it to the

306

PSH-12-0003 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 3 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0003 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing In September 2011, the Individual, a security clearance holder, was arrested for Driving While Intoxicated (DWI) and subsequently reported the arrest to the Local Security Office (LSO) at the DOE Facility where he worked. DOE Exhibit (Ex.) 19. Neither a September 2011 personnel security interview (PSI) nor a DOE-Contractor Psychologist's (DOE Psychologist) examination and evaluative report of the Individual resolved the security concerns raised by his 2011 DWI arrest. Consequently, the LSO informed the Individual, in a January 2011 notification letter (Notification Letter), that derogatory information existed which raised security concerns under 10

307

PSH-11-0034 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

34 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 34 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0034 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a DOE contractor and has held a DOE access authorization for several years. DOE Ex. 3. In August 2011, the Individual timely reported to the Local Security Office (LSO) her arrest for Driving Under the Influence (DUI) of alcohol. DOE Ex. 10. The incident prompted a September 2011 Personnel Security Interview (PSI). DOE Ex. 11. After the PSI, the LSO referred the Individual to a DOE consultant-psychiatrist ("the DOE psychiatrist") for an evaluation. The DOE psychiatrist evaluated the Individual in October 2011 and issued a report. DOE Ex. 8. After reviewing the Individual's personnel security file, the LSO informed the Individual in a November 2011 Notification Letter that there

308

PSH-12-0058 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

58 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 58 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0058 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is employed by a DOE contractor in a position that requires him to hold a DOE security clearance. For more than seven years, the individual has experienced financial difficulties, which resulted in the Local Security Office (LSO) conducting three personnel security interviews with him. In March 2012, the LSO sent a letter (Notification Letter) to the individual advising him that it possessed reliable information that created a substantial doubt regarding his eligibility to hold a security clearance. In an attachment to the Notification Letter, the LSO explained that the derogatory information fell within the purview of one potentially

309

TSO-1106 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

106 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 106 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1106 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is an applicant for a DOE access authorization in connection with his employment with a DOE contractor. DOE Ex. 3. During the application process, the Individual completed a Questionnaire for National Security Positions (QNSP) in June 2010, and participated in an October 2010 Personnel Security Interview (PSI). DOE Exs. 7, 8. After the PSI, the local security office (LSO) referred the Individual to a DOE consultant-psychologist ("the DOE psychologist") for an evaluation. The DOE psychologist evaluated the Individual in February 2011 and issued a report. DOE Ex. 10. After reviewing the Individual's personnel security file, the LSO informed the Individual in a June 2011 Notification Letter

310

PSH-12-0002 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

02 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 02 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0002 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual has been employed by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor since 1997, and has held a DOE access authorization for over 10 years. In October 2011, the individual tested positive for marijuana on a random drug test. The local security office (LSO) conducted a personnel security interview (PSI) with the individual in October 2011, and he admitted that he had used marijuana from 2007 to 2011 while in possession of a DOE security clearance. He also admitted that although he had certified on a January 2011 personnel security questionnaire that he had never illegally used a controlled substance while possessing a security clearance, he had

311

PSH-12-0038 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 8 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0038 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is employed at a DOE facility where his work requires him to have an access authorization. In December 2011, as part of a background investigation, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address his alcohol use. In addition to the PSI, the LSO requested the individual's medical records and recommended a psychiatric evaluation of the individual by a DOE consultant psychiatrist (DOE psychiatrist). The DOE psychiatrist examined the individual in February 2012 and memorialized his findings in a report (Psychiatric Report). According to the DOE psychiatrist, the individual suffers from Alcohol Dependence. The DOE psychiatrist further concluded

312

PSH-12-0044 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

44 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 44 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0044 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is a contractor employee at a DOE facility and has possessed a security clearance on various occasions since 1978. Exhibit (Ex.) 8 at 2. In December 2011, the Individual reported to the Local Security Office (LSO) that his wages were being garnished for back federal taxes. Ex. 13 at 1. Consequently, the LSO conducted a personnel security interview (PSI) with the Individual in January 2012. Ex. 15. Because the PSI and further investigation indicated that the Individual had not filed state and federal tax returns for several years and had a number of delinquent financial accounts, the LSO informed the Individual in a March 2012 notification

313

TSO-1006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TSO-1006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual works for a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor and holds a DOE access authorization, now in suspension. He provided inconsistent information on four separate occasions to the Local Security Office (LSO) concerning his diagnosis and treatment for mental health issues: in his responses to two Questionnaires for National Security Positions (QNSPs) in 2003 and 2009, during a background investigation interview conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in 2006, and during a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) in 2010. The LSO could not resolve these discrepancies to its satisfaction, so it referred the individual to a DOE

314

PSH-12-0046 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 6 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0046 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual works for a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor and holds a DOE access authorization, now in suspension. During 2009 through 2011, the individual used hydrocodone other than as directed and was consuming increasing amounts of alcohol. In October 2011, he voluntarily admitted himself into a substance abuse program at a local hospital. Upon discharge from the hospital, a psychologist diagnosed the individual with alcohol and opioid dependence. Because this information raised concerns about the individual's continued eligibility for access authorization, the local security office (LSO) called him in for an interview with a personnel security specialist. After the Personnel Security Interview (PSI) failed to

315

PSH-12-0029 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

29 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 29 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0029 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a DOE contractor in a position requiring him to hold a DOE access authorization. DOE Ex. 3. In December 2010, while on disability leave due to a medical condition, the Individual voluntarily entered an inpatient substance abuse facility to receive treatment for alcohol dependence. DOE Ex. 8. The Individual reported his treatment to his management, who in turn informed the Local Security Office (LSO). DOE Ex. 10 at 8-9. This potentially derogatory information prompted a March 2011 Personnel Security Interview (PSI). DOE Ex. 10. After the PSI, the LSO referred the Individual to a DOE consultant-psychiatrist ("the DOE

316

PSH-12-0015 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0015 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an applicant for a DOE security clearance. In July 2011, as part of a background investigation, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address his alcohol use. In addition to the PSI, the LSO requested the individual=s medical records and recommended a psychiatric evaluation of the individual by a DOE consultant psychiatrist (DOE psychiatrist). The DOE psychiatrist examined the individual in October 2011 and memorialized his findings in a report (Psychiatric Report). According to the DOE psychiatrist, the individual suffers from Alcohol Dependence. The DOE psychiatrist further

317

TSO-1105 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

105 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 105 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1105 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual currently is employed by a DOE contractor, and has held a DOE security clearance for several years. Based on issues contained in the individual's security file, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) with the individual in June 2011. PSI, DOE Ex. 6. In August 2011, the LSO suspended the individual's DOE security clearance and issued her a Notification Letter, together with a statement (Enclosure 2) setting forth the information that created a substantial doubt about the individual's eligibility to hold a DOE security clearance. (DOE Ex. 1). Specifically, the LSO alleges that the individual has raised a concern under 10 C.F.R. § 710.8(f) (Criterion F)

318

PSH-11-0018 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1-0018 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1-0018 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0018 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor. Based upon the receipt of derogatory information, the Local Security Office (LSO) called the Individual in for a Personnel Security Interview (PSI). As a result of the PSI, the Individual was referred to a local psychologist (the DOE psychologist) for an evaluation. The DOE psychologist prepared a written report setting forth the results of that evaluation. DOE Ex. 6. After reviewing the DOE psychologist's report, the LSO informed the Individual that derogatory information created a substantial doubt concerning his eligibility for access authorization. PSH-11-0018.pdf More Documents & Publications

319

TSO-1111 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

11 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 11 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1111 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The administrative review proceeding began with the issuance of a Notification Letter to the Individual. See 10 C.F.R. § 710.21. The letter informed the Individual that information in the possession of the DOE created a substantial doubt concerning his eligibility for a security clearance. Specifically, the Local Security Office (LSO) characterized this information as indicating that the Individual had engaged in unusual conduct which brought his honesty, trustworthiness, and reliability into question, and had been found by a psychologist to meet the criteria for alcohol abuse set forth in the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (Text

320

TSO-0001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TSO-0001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-0001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-0001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor, and has possessed a DOE accessauthorization for over twenty years. As a result of information that he disclosed to the DOE in connection withan arrest, the individual was asked for additional information at a Personnel Security Interview conducted in September 2001 (the 2001 PSI). Subsequently, the individual was referred to a psychiatrist (hereafter the "DOEConsultant Psychiatrist"), who conducted a psychiatric evaluation of the individual in March 2002. Following this evaluation, the individual's access authorization was suspended and in August 2002, the Manager of the DOE'slocal Operations Office issued a Notification Letter

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "hearing officer decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

PSH-11-0018 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

18 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 18 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0018 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor. Based upon the receipt of derogatory information, the Local Security Office (LSO) called the Individual in for a Personnel Security Interview (PSI). As a result of the PSI, the Individual was referred to a local psychologist (the DOE psychologist) for an evaluation. The DOE psychologist prepared a written report setting forth the results of that evaluation. DOE Ex. 6. After reviewing the DOE psychologist's report, the LSO informed the Individual that derogatory information created a substantial doubt concerning his eligibility for access authorization. PSH-11-0018.pdf More Documents & Publications

322

TSO-1007 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TSO-1007 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1007 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1007 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is employed by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor and has held a security clearance at the request of her employer since 1991. In November 2009, the individual was apprehended after shoplifting at a local store and the local police department gave her a citation for shoplifting. She reported the incident to the local security office (LSO) and the LSO conducted a personnel security interview (PSI) with the individual in December 2009. The individual stated that she did not intentionally steal any items and that she would not repeat her actions. The LSO concluded that the security concern was mitigated because the incident occurred under

323

TSO-1001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TSO-1001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-1001 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is employed by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor and has held a security clearance at the request of his employer since 2008. In August 2010, the individual tested positive for alcohol during an employment-related screening. He admitted consuming 10-12 beers the night before the test. The local security office (LSO) conducted a personnel security interview (PSI) with the individual in October 2010, wherein he admitted consuming at least one six-pack of beer nightly for the previous four years. The PSI did not resolve the security concerns regarding his alcohol use and the individual agreed to be evaluated by a DOE consultant-psychiatrist. In November 2010, a DOE consultant-psychiatrist

324

PSH-13-0097 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing 7 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0097 - In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a DOE contractor and holds a suspended access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) summoned the individual for a Personnel Security Interview (PSI), with a personnel security specialist on June 4, 2013, in order to address issues raised by an information report that he had failed to meet his income tax obligations and had his wages garnished by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) as a result. Exhibits 5, 8. After the PSI, the LSO determined that derogatory information existed that cast into doubt the individual's eligibility for access authorization. The LSO informed the individual of this determination in a letter that set forth the DOE's security concerns

325

PSH-12-0009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

09 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 09 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0009 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual began his DOE-related job in August 2006. Ex. D at 19, 53, 70-71. In a September 2007 personnel security interview (PSI), the individual stated that he had been charged with Possession of Marijuana in December 1995 and Minor in Possession in July 2001. See Ex. 8 at 20, 78-79. On his September 2011 QNSP, he denied that he had ever been charged with or convicted of an alcohol or drug-related offense. Ex. 11. In a November 2011 Letter of Interrogatory, the local security office (LSO) asked the individual why he had not acknowledged his December 1995 charge for Possession of Marijuana and his July 2001 charge for Minor in Possession. Ex. 9. In response, the individual indicated that he had been charged with

326

PSH-11-0021 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1-0021 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 1-0021 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-11-0021 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual currently is employed by a DOE contractor, and that contractor has requested that he receive a DOE security clearance. Based on issues contained in the individual's security file, the Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview with the individual in May 2011 (the 2011 PSI, DOE Ex. 17). In July 2011, a DOE-consultant psychiatrist evaluated the individual, and memorialized her findings in a Psychological Evaluation Report (the Report, DOE Ex. 6). In October 2011, the LSO issued a Notification Letter to the individual, together with a Summary of Security Concerns (Enclosure 2) setting forth the information

327

PSH-12-0053 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

53 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 53 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0053 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a DOE contractor and has held a DOE access authorization since 1980. DOE Exhibit (Ex.) 6. In October 2006, after reviewing the Individual's credit report during a routine reinvestigation in connection with her security clearance, the Local Security Office (LSO) requested that the Individual participate in a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) in order to discuss concerns raised by the Individual's finances. DOE Ex. 14. The Individual's security clearance was continued at that time. DOE Ex. 6. During a subsequent routine reinvestigation of the Individual's security clearance in 2011, concerns regarding the Individual's delinquent accounts and outstanding judgments surfaced. The

328

PSH-12-0042 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

42 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 42 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0042 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing This case involves an Individual who failed to meet his financial obligations during the final years of his first marriage. The Individual reported the repossession of his motor vehicle and a home foreclosure to the Local Security Office (LSO) in 2008. The LSO subsequently conducted a series of three Personal Security Interviews (PSI) of the Individual, the most recent on February 1, 2012. Unable to resolve the security concerns raised by the Individual's failure to resolve his financial issues, the LSO initiated administrative review proceedings by issuing a letter (Notification Letter) advising the Individual that it possessed reliable information that created a substantial doubt regarding his eligibility to

329

PSH-12-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 2-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a DOE contractor and holds a suspended access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) summoned the individual for an interview (PSI) with a personnel security specialist on November 9, 2011, Exhibit 4, in order to address issues surrounding his finances. Id. at 12-13. After the PSI, the LSO determined that derogatory information existed that cast into doubt the individual's eligibility for access authorization. The LSO informed the individual of this determination in a letter that set forth the DOE's security concerns and the reasons for those concerns. Exhibit 1. The Notification Letter also informed the

330

PSH-12-0004 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

04 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing 04 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0004 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual works for a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor and holds a DOE access authorization, now in suspension. In September of 2011, the individual informed his contractor, which in turn informed the local DOE security office (LSO), that he had been hospitalized for treatment of his depression and suicidal thoughts. Exhibit 15. The LSO summoned the individual for an interview with a personnel security specialist on September 20, 2011. Exhibit 22 (Transcript of Personnel Security Interview). After this Personnel Security Interview (PSI), the LSO referred the individual to a local psychiatrist (DOE psychiatrist) for an agency-sponsored evaluation. The DOE psychiatrist prepared a written

331

INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT OFFICE MANAGEMENT OFFICE  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT OFFICE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT OFFICE THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH University of Utah | Investment Management Office Quarterly Summary The Endowment Pool had a positive first quarter (ending March gain from investments of $7.8 million. The Endowment Pool unit value of $100 has grown to $175 in 10

332

P:\DECISION\0083.tbz.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Pursuant to Part 708, an OHA attorney conducted an investigation of the present complaint and issued a Report of Investigation (ROI) on January 9, 2009, in which he concluded that the complainant could not have reasonably believed that he revealed a substantial and specific danger to employees or to public health or safety. I was appointed the Hearing Officer to conduct a hearing on the Complaint. In a letter dated January 21, 2009, I directed the complainant to submit a brief that addressed why the statements that he made to Dr. James Lynn, EAS President, could be properly characterized for purposes of 10 C.F.R. Part 708 as evidence of "a substantial and specific danger to employees or to public heath or safety." I further indicated to the complainant that he was free to submit additional documentary evidence

333

R:\DECISION\0027.TBU  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 13, 2004 August 13, 2004 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Case: Clint Olson Date of Filing: July 1, 2004 Case Number: TBU-0027 Clint Olson (the complainant or the employee), appeals the dismissal of his complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. As explained below, the dismissal of the complaint should be reversed and the matter should be remanded for further processing to the Manager of the Employee Concerns Program (Manager) at the National Nuclear Security Administration Service Center (NNSA). I. Background The complainant is an employee of BWXT Pantex (BWXT), the Management and Operations Contractor at the DOE's Pantex Plant in Amarillo, Texas. He is employed as a counterintelligence

334

Vehicle Technologies Office: Vehicle Technologies Office Recognizes  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Vehicle Technologies Vehicle Technologies Office Recognizes Outstanding Researchers to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: Vehicle Technologies Office Recognizes Outstanding Researchers on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: Vehicle Technologies Office Recognizes Outstanding Researchers on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: Vehicle Technologies Office Recognizes Outstanding Researchers on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: Vehicle Technologies Office Recognizes Outstanding Researchers on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: Vehicle Technologies Office Recognizes Outstanding Researchers on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: Vehicle Technologies Office Recognizes Outstanding Researchers on AddThis.com...

335

Nevada Site Office Invites Public to Participate in Draft Nevada National  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Site Office Invites Public to Participate in Draft Nevada Site Office Invites Public to Participate in Draft Nevada National Security Site Environmental Impact Statement Hearings Nevada Site Office Invites Public to Participate in Draft Nevada National Security Site Environmental Impact Statement Hearings September 13, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Darwin J. Morgan morgan@nv.doe.gov 702-295-3521 Kelly K. Snyder snyderk@nv.doe.gov 702-295-3521 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office is holding a series of public hearings in September 2011 to discuss the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement (SWEIS) for the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) and Off-Site Locations in Nevada. These meetings are part of an official public comment period that spans from July 29 through October 27, 2011.

336

SECRETARY'S OFFICE  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

SECRETARY'S OFFICE ... The October 4, 1957 launching of Sputnik instigated a scurried emphasis on science or accentuated the lack of it in the United States. ...

1961-03-06T23:59:59.000Z

337

SECRETARY'S OFFICE  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

SECRETARY'S OFFICE ... Contact with an inspiring elementary school science teacher or a challenging course in high school chemistry may have contributed to the change. ...

ROBERT L. SILVER

1962-04-02T23:59:59.000Z

338

Office Buildings  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Since they comprised 18 percent of commercial floorspace, this means that their total energy intensity was just slightly above average. Office buildings predominantly used...

339

Office equipment energy use and trends  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Office information technologies are using an increasing amount of energy in commercial buildings. During recent forecasting hearings in California, the office equipment end use has been a major source of differences among forecasts of commercial sector energy use. Not only are there major differences in forecasted load growth resulting from the energy use of office equipment, but there are also differences in interpretations of historical and base-year estimates. Understanding office equipment energy use is particularly important because office equipment is widely believed to be the fastest growing electrical end use in the fastest growing sector. This report describes the development and application of a spreadsheet to estimate current and future energy use by office equipment. We define the term ``office equipment`` to mean information processing technologies used in buildings. The seven categories of office equipment relate to categories found in our analysis of utility surveys and industry sales reports. These seven categories of equipment are examined for eleven types of commercial buildings.

Piette, M.A.; Eto, J.H.; Harris, J.P.

1991-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

340

Office equipment energy use and trends  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Office information technologies are using an increasing amount of energy in commercial buildings. During recent forecasting hearings in California, the office equipment end use has been a major source of differences among forecasts of commercial sector energy use. Not only are there major differences in forecasted load growth resulting from the energy use of office equipment, but there are also differences in interpretations of historical and base-year estimates. Understanding office equipment energy use is particularly important because office equipment is widely believed to be the fastest growing electrical end use in the fastest growing sector. This report describes the development and application of a spreadsheet to estimate current and future energy use by office equipment. We define the term office equipment'' to mean information processing technologies used in buildings. The seven categories of office equipment relate to categories found in our analysis of utility surveys and industry sales reports. These seven categories of equipment are examined for eleven types of commercial buildings.

Piette, M.A.; Eto, J.H.; Harris, J.P.

1991-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "hearing officer decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

The Sense of Hearing in Fish*  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... THERE is an old dispute as to whether fish are able to hear or not. It has seemed improbable that they can. Three ... main reasons have been brought forward against it. (1) A biological reason: most fish seem to be dumb ; a sense of hearing would therefore not be of biological ...

K. VON FRISCH

1938-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

342

Audiometry (hearing test) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Audiometry (hearing test) Audiometry (hearing test) Audiometry (hearing test) The audiogram is an evaluation of how well an individual can hear. Sounds are presented to the individual through earphones during the test. These sounds are presented at different levels of frequency and intensity. The human ear responds to the frequency or pitch of a sound and the intensity or loudness of the sound. The frequency of the sound is measured in Hertz (Hz), and the loudness of the sound is measured in decibels (dB). During the procedure, the responses of the individual are recorded on a graph. An individual has no impairment in hearing if he or she detects the sound that is presented through the earphones in the range of 0 to 25 decibels. The audiogram indicates how much louder (in decibels) the pure tone frequency

343

Sustainability Performance Office | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Sustainability Performance Office Sustainability Performance Office Sustainability Performance Office Sustainability Performance Office Sustainability Performance Office...

344

DECISION MODELS FOR EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANNING  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

widespread applications in civilian sectors, both in private companies and in the nonmilitary government. The majority of Fortune 500 companies have utilized O.R. inside to help them in their decision making, long.R. experience, created its DRAFT #12;own permanent O.R. group within the City's Office of Management and Budget

Wang, Hai

345

Slide25 | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and Technical...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

research capabilities * Provide a sound basis for decision-making * Drive innovation Brian Hitson U.S. DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information Chair, Energy...

346

Protect Your Hearing Every Day Information and Recommendations  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

that it too loud, or too loud for too long, is dangerous to hearing health, no matter what kind of sound musicians, this involves safeguarding your hearing health. Whatever your plans after graduation whether some information on hearing health and hearing loss and let you know about the precautionary measures

Saldin, Dilano

347

VBA-0061- In the Matter of Bernard Cowan  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On July 18, 2002, Argonne National Laboratory-West (ANL or the contractor) filed an appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued by an Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) Hearing Officer...

348

VBA-0007- In the Matter of Salvatore Gionfriddo  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On October 13, 1999, Salvatore Gionfriddo (Appellant or Complainant) filed a Notice of Appeal from an Initial Agency Decision by a Hearing Officer from the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA)...

349

VBA-0011- In the Matter of Diane E. Meier  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On January 11, 2000, Diane E. Meier (Meier) filed a Notice of Appeal from an Initial Agency Decision by a Hearing Officer from the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy ...

350

Office of Chief Financial Officer  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Order implements the provisions of the Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990 within the Department of Energy. Cancels SEN 34-91. Canceled by DOE O 520.1A.

2001-01-19T23:59:59.000Z

351

United States General Accounting Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Washington, DC 20548 Washington, DC 20548 Comptroller General of the United States Decision Matter of: The Jones/Hill Joint Venture File: B-286194.4; B-286194.5; B-286194.6 Date: December 5, 2001 William A. Roberts III, Esq., Phillip H. Harrington, Esq., William S. Lieth, Esq., and Janet L. Eichers, Esq., Wiley, Rein & Fielding, for the protester. Marvin D. Norman, Esq., Vicki E. O'Keefe, Esq., and Robert E. Little, Jr., Esq., Department of the Navy, for the agency. Louis A. Chiarella, Esq., John L. Formica, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST 1. A conflict of interest existed in an Office of Management and Budget Circular A-76 commercial activities study where a Navy employee and a private-sector consultant

352

R:\DECISION\0002.TBU  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7, 2002 7, 2002 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Decision of the Director Name of Petitioner: Mark J. Chugg Date of Filing: October 9, 2002 Case Number: TBU-0002 Mark J. Chugg, a former employee of Bechtel BWXT Idaho (BWXT), a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor, appeals the dismissal of his whistleblower complaint filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program. BWXT is the Management and Operating contractor for the Department of Energy at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL). On September 30, 2002, the Employee Concerns Program Manager at the DOE's Idaho Operations Office (DOE/ID) dismissed Mr. Chugg's complaint. As explained below, I reverse the dismissal of the subject complaint, and remand the matter to DOE/ID for further

353

R:\DECISION\0083.VBU  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 21, 2001 Complaint is not at issue in the present case. June 21, 2001 Complaint is not at issue in the present case. March 2, 2004 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Decision of the Director Name of Petitioner: S. R. Davis Date of Filing: February 6, 2004 Case Number: VBU-0083 S. R. Davis, a former employee of Fluor Fernald, Inc. (Fluor), a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor, appeals the DOE Ohio Field Office's (OFO) dismissal of the whistleblower complaint against Fluor she filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program. As explained below, I am affirming OFO's dismissal of the subject complaint. I. BACKGROUND A. The DOE's Contractor Employee Protection Program The DOE's Contractor Employee Protection Program was established to safeguard "public and employee

354

Office of Headquarters Security Operations  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Headquarters Security Operations strengthens national security by protecting personnel, facilities, property, classified information, and sensitive unclassified information for DOE Headquarters facilities in the National Capital Area under normal and abnormal (i.e., emergency) conditions; managing access authorization functions for Headquarters; ensuring that executives and dignitaries are fully protected, and supporting efforts to ensure the continuity of government in all circumstances as mandated by Presidential Decision Directive.

355

2000 Records of Decision  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

History Book Records of Decision Tribal Affairs 2000 Records of Decision Fourmile Hill Geothermal Development Project Power Purchase and Transmission Service Agreements -...

356

Speech-Language-Hearing Department of Communication  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

and stuttering. Prof. Gottwald is ASHA certified, holds a NH license to practice speech-language pathology Speech-Language-Hearing Center for almost two years. I have had a stutter almost all of my life and I

New Hampshire, University of

357

Director's Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Director's Office Director's Office Director's Office Print Roger Falcone Director, Advanced Light Source, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Professor of Physics, University of California, Berkeley. Roger Falcone Web page at the University of California, Berkeley Advanced Light Source Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 Cyclotron Road, MS 80R0114 Berkeley, CA 94720 USA Tel. (510) 486-6692 Fax (510) 486-4960 Email: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it Roger Falcone, University of California, Berkeley physics professor and veteran ALS user, succeeded Janos Kirz as ALS Division Director on September 1, 2006. Dr. Falcone received his undergraduate degree in physics from Princeton University in 1974. He earned an M.S. and Ph.D. in

358

Case No. VWZ-0006 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Motion to Dismiss Name of Petitioner: META, Inc. Date of Filing: May 21, 1996 Case Number: VWZ-0006 This Decision considers a Motion to Dismiss filed by Maria Elena Torano Associates, Inc. (META) on May 21, 1996. In its Motion, META seeks the dismissal on jurisdictional grounds of the underlying complaint and hearing request filed by its former employee C. Lawrence Cornett under the Department of Energy's Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. On July 31, 1996, I conducted a hearing to receive evidence regarding the jurisdictional issues raised by META's Motion to Dismiss. META argues that DOE does not have jurisdiction to hear Mr. Cornett's complaint since Part 708 applies only to employees of DOE contractors who perform work at DOE-owned or DOE-leased facilities.

359

DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR -HB 7090  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

mandated by the CSP, the Chairperson of the CSP. 5. Submit the form to the Office of the Registrar, DHMC or Date Chairperson of CSP (when change is related to a CSP decision) Form revised 1/2001 #12;

Lotko, William

360

Technology Areas and Offices  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

The Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) consists of several offices that support EERE's mission. This page lists all of the major offices and their websites.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "hearing officer decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Decision Analysis for EGS  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decision Analysis for EGS presentation at the April 2013 peer review meeting held in Denver, Colorado.

362

Decision Theory Mendoza, M.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 MS 1319 Decision Theory Mendoza, M. Dept. Statistics, ITAM Rio Hondo 1, San Angel. México 01000 D of Decision Theory, the literature offers an account of the ways people actually make decisions and a discussion on the mechanisms underlying this behavior. This is called a "descriptive" decision theory

Mendoza Ramírez, Manuel

363

Appendix A: Committee on Student Conduct Hearing Procedures Committee on Student Conduct Hearing Procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Appendix A: Committee on Student Conduct Hearing Procedures Committee on Student Conduct Hearing Procedures A. Introduction B. Parties to the Complaint C. Committee and Panels D. Cases of Physical. For the purpose of these procedures, the parties are identified as the University presenter and the accused

Amin, S. Massoud

364

Chief Financial Officer, Oak Ridge Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A successful candidate in this position will serve as the Chief Financial Officer, Oak Ridge Office, providing overall executive leadership for financial management, budgeting, contractor...

365

Office of Chief Financial Officer  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

Page Change 1 to DOE O 520.1 modifies the responsibility statement to include NNSA Field CFO positions, modifies Heads of Field Elements responsibilities for consistency with the CFO responsibilities, and makes a minor change to reflect the establishment of the Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation. Cancels SEN 34-9.

2001-11-27T23:59:59.000Z

366

Opinions and decisions of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission with selected orders, July 1, 1995--December 31, 1995. Volume 42, Pages 1-258  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This is the 42nd volume of issuances of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and its Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards, Administrative Law Judges, and Office Directors. This book is a reprinting, containing corrections of numerous printing errors in a previously distributed book. It covers the period from July 1, 1995 to December 31, 1995. Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards conduct adjudicatory hearings on applications to construct and operate nuclear power plants and related facilities, and issue initial decisions which, subject to internal review and appellate procedures, become the final Commission action with respect to those applications. The hardbound edition of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuances is a final compilation of the monthly issuances. It includes all of the legal precedents for the agency within a 6-month period. Any opinions, decisions, denials, memoranda and orders of the Commission inadvertently omitted from the monthly editions and any corrections submitted by the NRC legal staff to the printed softbound issuances are contained in the hardbound edition.

NONE

1996-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

367

Strategic Programs Office FY14 Budget At-a-Glance  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

STRATEGIC PROGRAMS OFFICE STRATEGIC PROGRAMS OFFICE FY14 BUDGET AT-A-GLANCE The mission of the Office of Strategic Programs is to increase the effectiveness and impact of all EERE activities by funding cross-cutting activities and initiatives, analysis, and engagement functions with key stakeholders, the media, and the public. Strategic Programs' projects, work products, and activities directly contribute to realizing EERE's mission, facilitate and amplify the successes of EERE technology offices, and soundly and consistently inform the Assistant Secretary's decisions. What We Do Strategic Programs (SP) is a core, cross-cutting EERE office that focuses on accelerating the development, commercialization,

368

TSO-01113 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

TSO-01113 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing TSO-01113 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual currently is employed by a DOE contractor, and that...

369

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: A  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Procuring Fuel Cells Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers (Text Version) to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers (Text Version) on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers (Text Version) on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers (Text Version) on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers (Text Version) on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Procuring Fuel Cells for

370

Office Buildings - Types of Office Buildings  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

PDF Office Buildings PDF Office Buildings Types of Office Buildings | Energy Consumption | End-Use Equipment Although no one building type dominates the commercial buildings sector, office buildings are the most common and account for more than 800,000 buildings or 17 percent of total commercial buildings. Offices comprised more than 12 billion square feet of floorspace, 17 percent of total commercial floorspace, the most of any building type. Types of Office Buildings The 2003 CBECS Detailed Tables present data for office buildings along with other principal building activities (see Detailed Tables B13 and B14, for example). Since office buildings comprise a wide range of office-related activities, survey respondents were presented with a follow-up list of specific office types to choose from. Although we have not presented the

371

Microsoft Word - 1103.tso.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: September 1, 2011 ) ) Case No.: TSO-1103 ) ___________________________________ ) Issued: February 28, 2012 _______________ Hearing Officer Decision _______________ Valerie Vance Adeyeye, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual@) to hold an access authorization under the regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part

372

2007 Records of Decision  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

of Decision Tribal Affairs 2007 Records of Decision October 5, 2007 - Klondike III Wind Project Power Purchase ROD (PDF, 14 pages, 136 KB) July 19, 2007 - NEPA Long-Term...

373

Office | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Building Type Office Building Type Office Definition Buildings used for general office space, professional office, or administrative offices. Medical offices are included here if they do not use any type of diagnostic medical equipment (if they do, they are categorized as an outpatient health care building). Sub Categories administrative or professional office; government office; mixed-use office; bank or other financial institution; medical office; sales office; contractor's office (e.g. construction, plumbing, HVAC); non-profit or social services; research and development; city hall or city center; religious office; call center References EIA CBECS Building Types [1] References ↑ EIA CBECS Building Types U.S. Energy Information Administration (Oct 2008) Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Office&oldid=270116

374

DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Initial Agency Decision  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DECISION AND ORDER DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Initial Agency Decision Names of Petitioners: META, Inc. Logistics Applications, Inc. Dates of Filing:April 22, 1996 May 22, 1996 Case Numbers: VWA-0006 VWA-0013 This Decision involves a whistleblower complaint filed by Mr. Eugene Greer under the Department of Energy's Contractor Employee Protection Program, codified at 10 C.F.R. Part 708. Until his employment was terminated on November 4, 1993, Mr. Greer was an audio-visual operator at DOE Headquarters employed by two DOE contractors, Omega, Inc., and its successor META, Inc. During Omega's tenure, the Office of Inspector General (IG) interviewed Mr. Greer in connection with an investigation of misuse of government property by two DOE employees responsible for supervising the audio-visual contract.

375

Systems Engineering and Integration: Decision Applications: D, Decision  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Systems Engineering and Integration Home Systems Engineering and Integration Home CONTACTS Group Leader Julianna Fessenden-Rahn Deputy Group Leader Vacant Office Administrator Lorraine Johnson d division logo image Systems Engineering and Integration The Systems Engineering & Integration Group (D-3) helps policy-makers anticipate and respond to constantly evolving weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and natural threats on local and global scales-from chemical, biological, radiological, and explosive (CBRE) events to catastrophic natural disasters. We provide scientific, systematic, and integrated decision support in these areas: prevention preparation characterization response recovery public health protection We develop and deploy comprehensive, integrated CBRE and wide-area surveillance systems, using system-of-systems architectures and technologies. reactor

376

P:\DECISION\0027.tbh.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7, 2005 7, 2005 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Initial Agency Decision Name of Petitioner: Clint Olson Date of Filing: April 12, 2005 Case Number: TBH-0027 This Initial Agency Decision involves a whistleblower complaint filed by Mr. Clint Olson (also referred to as the complainant or the individual) under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. The complainant is an employee of BWXT Pantex (BWXT), the Management and Operations Contractor at the DOE's Pantex Plant in Amarillo, Texas. From July 1999 until November 2004, he was employed as a counter-intelligence officer (CIO) at the plant. On March 15, 2004, he filed a complaint of retaliation against BWXT with the Manager of the Employee Concerns Program (Employee Concerns Manager) at the DOE's

377

P:\DECISION\0040.tbu.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 23, 2006 February 23, 2006 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Case: Caroline C. Roberts Date of Filing: January 26, 2006 Case Number: TBU-0040 Caroline C. Roberts (the complainant), appeals the dismissal of her complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. As explained below, the dismissal of the complaint should be sustained, and the appeal denied. I. Background The complainant is a former employee of the DOE's Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in Los Alamos, New Mexico. She claims that during the period October 2003 through August 2004 she made disclosures that are protected under Section 708.5. On August 9, 2004, she was terminated from her LANL position and on August 5,

378

P:\DECISION\0082tbu.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Contractor Whistleblower Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708 prohibits employers from retailiating against DOE Contractor Whistleblower Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708 prohibits employers from retailiating against contractor employees who engage in various defined protected activities such as, reporting a substantial violation of law, gross mismanagement or waste of funds, or a substantial and specific danger to employees or public health and safety. See 10 C.F.R. § 708.5. 2 This section relies on the facts alleged in Townsend's September 7, 2007, complaint and in his Appeal submission submitted September 15, 2008. October 6, 2008 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Case: Thomas L. Townsend Date of Filing: September 15, 2008 Case Number: TBU-0082 Thomas L. Townsend (Townsend) appeals the dismissal of his complaint of retaliation and request

379

P:\DECISION\0033.tbu.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Plum Brook Station is located in Sandusky, Ohio. Plum Brook Station is located in Sandusky, Ohio. April 26, 2005 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Case: Michael Goetz Date of Filing: March 28, 2005 Case Number: TBU-0033 Michael Goetz (the complainant) appeals the dismissal of his complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. As explained below, the dismissal of the complaint is upheld. I. Background The complainant alleges the following facts. In 2000, he was employed by "MOTA," a DOE subcontractor at the DOE's Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) located in Argonne, Illinois. He filed a report describing safety violations involving radioactive materials and other safety matters that took place between February

380

P:\DECISION\0070.tbu.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 16, 2007 July 16, 2007 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Appeal Name of Case: Sharon M. Fiorillo Date of Filing: July 5, 2007 Case Number: TBU-0070 Sharon M. Fiorillo (the complainant), appeals the dismissal of her complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. The complaint was filed on May 4, 2007. As explained below, the dismissal of the complaint should be sustained, and the appeal denied. I. Background The complainant was a secretary with a DOE contractor, Performance Results Corporation (PRC), located at the DOE's National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The complainant claims that on February 5, 2007, she disclosed an incident of workplace violence to an employee of the DOE's Inspector

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "hearing officer decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

T-557: Microsoft Office Excel Office Art Object Parsing Remote...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7: Microsoft Office Excel Office Art Object Parsing Remote Code Execution Vulnerability T-557: Microsoft Office Excel Office Art Object Parsing Remote Code Execution Vulnerability...

382

Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Billing System PIA, Office...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Billing System PIA, Office of Health, Safety and Security Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Billing System PIA, Office of Health, Safety and...

383

Western Area Power Administration Record of Decision for the Sierra Nevada Customer Service Region 2004 Power Marketing Program, April 11, 1997  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 81 / Monday, April 28, 1997 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Hearings and Appeals Notice of Cases Filed; Week of February 3 Through February 7, 1997 During the Week of February 3 through February 7, 1997, the appeals, applications, petitions or other requests listed in this Notice were filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. Any person who will be aggrieved by the DOE action sought in any of these cases may file written comments on the application within ten days of publication of this Notice or the date of receipt of actual notice, whichever occurs first. All such comments shall be filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals, Department of Energy, Washington, DC 20585-0107. Dated: March 3, 1997.

384

Office of Advanced Nuclear Research Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Integrate applicable work conducted in programs in the Offices of Nuclear Energy (Gen IV, NERI, I · FY 2010: Complete the design of a commercial-scale nuclear hydrogen production system · FY 2015 to budget uncertainties (risk/benefit) · Guide the development of technology to support decisions Develop

385

Office of the Chief Financial Officer  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Welcome to the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the Chief Financial Officer. The mission of the Office of the Chief Financial Officer is to assure the effective management and financial integrity of Department of Energy programs, activities, and resources by developing and implementing and monitoring Department-wide policies and systems in the areas of budget administration, program analysis and evaluation, finance and accounting, internal controls, corporate financial systems, and strategic planning.

386

Workforce Management Office  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

The Workforce Management Office provides leadership, policy guidance, and technical advice to Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) managers, supervisors, and employees on a broad...

387

Project Management Coordination Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Project Management Coordination Office (PMCO) provides guidance, leadership, training, and tools to Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) management and the field in the area...

388

Vehicle Technologies Office: Conferences  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Vehicle Technologies Office supports and sponsors conferences related to the Office's goals and objectives. When such conferences are planned and conference information becomes available, it...

389

Contracting Officers Guidebook  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Contracting Officers Guidebook Energy Lawyers and Contracting Officers Working Group April 12, 2012 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Spring 2012 Jekyll Island, GA UESC...

390

Responsible University Officer Chief Information Officer  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

technology and that contains procedures on how to handle Information Security Incidents, including contactResponsible University Officer Chief Information Officer Responsible Office Information Technology and manage their own Information Technology must designate employees as primary and back-up Information

Whitton, Mary C.

391

Responsible University Officer Chief Information Officer  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Technology Services granted by UNC-Chapel Hill. It also applies to each business unit at the University procedures on how to handle Information Security Incidents, including contact information for business unitResponsible University Officer Chief Information Officer Responsible Office Information Technology

Whitton, Mary C.

392

PSU Business Affairs Office Purchasing Office  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

PSU Business Affairs Office Purchasing Office Costco Warehouse Program CARD USER AGREEMENT For each to the PSU Purchasing Office by the following date/time:____________________________________________. All admittance and make purchases at Costco. These cards and the original receipt will be promptly returned

Caughman, John

393

Draft Greater Than Class C EIS Public Hearings to Come to Pasco, WA and  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

The United States Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Environmental Management (EM), is preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for disposal of Greater-Than-Class C Low-Level Radioactive Waste (GTCC LLRW). The EIS evaluates potential alternatives involving various disposal methods for application at six federally owned sites and generic commercial sites. (See Overview Below). The United States Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Environmental Management (EM), is preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for disposal of Greater-Than-Class C Low-Level Radioactive Waste (GTCC LLRW). The EIS evaluates potential alternatives involving various disposal methods for application at six federally owned sites and generic commercial sites. (See Overview Below). Upcoming Public Hearings DOE will hold hearings in the following locations on the following dates and times. Las Vegas, NV Desert Research Institute - Frank Rodgers Building 755 East Flamingo Road, Las Vegas, NV 89119 May 9, 2011, 5:30 p.m.�9:30 p.m. Idaho Falls, ID Shilo Inn Suites Hotel 780 Lindsay Boulevard, Idaho Falls, ID 83402 May 11, 2011, 5:30 p.m.�9:30 p.m.

394

Where are all the white kids?: the effects of race in juvenile court decision making  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

WHERE ARE ALL THE WHITE KIDS? THE EFFECTS OF RACE IN JUVENILE COURT DECISION MAKING A Dissertation by PAUL KETCHUM Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements... for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2008 Major Subject: Sociology WHERE ARE ALL THE WHITE KIDS? THE EFFECTS OF RACE IN JUVENILE COURT DECISION MAKING A Dissertation by PAUL KETCHUM Submitted to the Office of Graduate...

Ketchum, Paul Robert

2008-10-10T23:59:59.000Z

395

Quantum Decision Theory  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

We argue that, contrary to conventional wisdom, decision theory is not invariant to the physical environment in which a decision is made. Specifically, we show that a decision maker (DM) with access to quantum information resources may be able to do strictly better than a DM with access only to classical information resources. In this respect, our findings are somewhat akin to those in computer science that have established the superiority of quantum over classical algorithms for certain problems. We treat three kinds of decision tree (Kuhn [1950], [1953]): Kuhn trees in which the DM does or does not have perfect recall, and non-Kuhn trees.

Adam Brandenburger; Pierfrancesco La Mura

2011-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

396

2002 Records of Decision  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2-Records-of-Decision Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects & Initiatives Expand Projects & Initiatives Finance...

397

1996 Records of Decision  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6-Records-of-Decision Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects & Initiatives Expand Projects & Initiatives Finance...

398

2005 Records of Decision  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5-Records-of-Decision Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects & Initiatives Expand Projects & Initiatives Finance...

399

2012 Records of Decision  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2-Records-of-Decision Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects & Initiatives Expand Projects & Initiatives Finance...

400

2010 Records of Decision  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0-Records-of-Decision Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects & Initiatives Expand Projects & Initiatives Finance...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "hearing officer decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

2013 Records of Decision  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3-Records-of-Decision Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects & Initiatives Expand Projects & Initiatives Finance...

402

1999 Records of Decision  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9-Records-of-Decision Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects & Initiatives Expand Projects & Initiatives Finance...

403

2011 Records of Decision  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1-Records-of-Decision Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects & Initiatives Expand Projects & Initiatives Finance...

404

Office of Security Operations: Mission and Functions  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Mission and Functions Mission and Functions Mission The Office of Headquarters Security Operations strengthens national security by protecting personnel, facilities, property, classified information, and sensitive unclassified information for DOE Headquarters facilities in the National Capital Area under normal and abnormal (i.e., emergency) conditions; managing access authorization functions; ensuring that executives and dignitaries are fully protected, and supporting efforts to ensure the continuity of government in all circumstances as mandated by Presidential Decision Directive. The Office is the database owner for the principal personnel security information processing activities of the Department and personnel security administrative review process. Functions

405

Fermi Site Office Post Office Box 2000  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Fermi Site Office Fermi Site Office Post Office Box 2000 Batavia, Illinois 60510 JAN 14 2011 Scott Blake Harris, General Counsel GC-1 FORS SUBJECT: FERMl SITE OFFICE (FSO) 201 1 ANNUAL NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) PLANNING SUIMMARY The Department of Energy (DOE) Order 451 .I B, Change 2, requires Secretarial Officers and Heads of Field Organizations to submit a NEPA Annual Planning Summary to the Office of General Counsel. Per your December 8, 2010 memorandum and guidance provided by the Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance (GC-54), our Annual NEPA Planning Summary is enclosed. We have identified one on-going environmental assessment (EA). No environmental impact statements (EISs) are on-going and two new EAs and one EIS are expected to be prepared beginning in the next 12 to 24 months.

406

THE SECRETARY'S OFFICE  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

THE SECRETARY'S OFFICE ... Fields such as engineering and science that attract principally men were affected most. ...

1952-03-24T23:59:59.000Z

407

Simulation Supported Decision Making  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

.S. Navy Nuclear Program · Decades of dynamic operations of hundreds of nuclear power plants withoutSimulation Supported Decision Making Gene Allen Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division SI: TO PASS ON WHAT I KNOW on SIMULATION · CAREER FOCUS: HOW TO USE COMPUTERS TO DO HELP MAKE BETTER DECISIONS

408

The neutron warhead decision  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The neutron warhead decision ... Nuclear war moved a step closer last week with the U.S.'s decision to move ahead with production of so-called neutron warheads for use on short-range missiles and in artillery shells. ... And neutron weapons would be almost as effective on ... ...

MICHAEL HEYLIN

1981-08-17T23:59:59.000Z

409

LOVE CANAL CLEANUP: EPA revamps plan, safety decision  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

LOVE CANAL CLEANUP: EPA revamps plan, safety decision ... EPA's announcement of a revised plan for handling the remaining contamination at Love Canal was prompted by a contractor's finding of "significant migration of chemicals beyond the proposed wall location," and by a close review of a recent Office of Technology Assessment study. ...

1983-10-03T23:59:59.000Z

410

DOE contract management. Hearings before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, First Session, February 17 and May 26, 1993  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This hearing focuses on US DOE government contracts and the US DOE government contractors, with an emphasis on evidence of waste, mismanagement, and fraud. Testifying were the following individuals: M. Conley, Assistant Inspector General, DOE; J. Layton, Inspector General, DOE; H. O'Leary, Secretary, DOE; V. Rezendes, Energy and Science Issues, Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division, General Accounting Office.

Not Available

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

411

Implementation of a Signal Processor with Intelligibility for Hearing Aid Devices  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Hearing loss victims suffer from loss of hearing at specific bands of the frequency spectrum. We designed a programmable filter that can compensate for hearing losses at different frequency bands. We design the circuit using operational amplifiers...

Prasad, Sharath N.

2011-08-08T23:59:59.000Z

412

Building Technologies Office: Webinars  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Webinars Webinars Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Building Technologies Office: Webinars to someone by E-mail Share Building Technologies Office: Webinars on Facebook Tweet about Building Technologies Office: Webinars on Twitter Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Webinars on Google Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Webinars on Delicious Rank Building Technologies Office: Webinars on Digg Find More places to share Building Technologies Office: Webinars on AddThis.com... Popular Links Success Stories Previous Next Lighten Energy Loads with System Design. Warming Up to Pump Heat. Cut Refrigerator Energy Use to Save Money. Tools EnergyPlus Whole Building Simulation Program Building Energy Software Tools Directory High Performance Buildings Database

413

Meeting Decisions and Documents  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Meeting Notices Meeting Decisions & Documents Production Team Indicators System Coastal Resilience Resources Make Our Science Accessible Link Climate Change & Health Provide Data and Tools Coordinate Internationally Meeting Decisions and Documents Print E-mail This page summarizes the decisions made by the National Climate Assessment Development and Advisory Committee (NCADAC) and the documents the committee has adopted in association with those decisions. The documents and decisions concern the operation of the committee, the content of the synthesis report(s), the sustained assessment process, and other important guidance and responsibilities. The full and official meeting records of the NCADAC are available on a dedicated NOAA page. To view the Federal Register notices announcing the meetings of the NCADAC, please click here.

414

How brains make decisions  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This chapter, dedicated to the memory of Mino Freund, summarizes the Quantum Decision Theory (QDT) that we have developed in a series of publications since 2008. We formulate a general mathematical scheme of how decisions are taken, using the point of view of psychological and cognitive sciences, without touching physiological aspects. The basic principles of how intelligence acts are discussed. The human brain processes involved in decisions are argued to be principally different from straightforward computer operations. The difference lies in the conscious-subconscious duality of the decision making process and the role of emotions that compete with utility optimization. The most general approach for characterizing the process of decision making, taking into account the conscious-subconscious duality, uses the framework of functional analysis in Hilbert spaces, similarly to that used in the quantum theory of measurements. This does not imply that the brain is a quantum system, but just allows for the simple...

Yukalov, V I

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

415

Office Buildings - Full Report  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Office Buildings - Full Report Office Buildings - Full Report file:///C|/mydocs/CBECS2003/PBA%20report/office%20report/office_pdf.html[9/24/2010 3:33:25 PM] Although no one building type dominates the commercial buildings sector, office buildings are the most common and account for more than 800,000 buildings or 17 percent of total commercial buildings. Offices comprised more than 12 billion square feet of floorspace, 17 percent of total commercial floorspace, the most of any building type. Types of Office Buildings The 2003 CBECS Detailed Tables present data for office buildings along with other principal building activities (see Detailed Tables B13 and B14, for example). Since office buildings comprise a wide range of office-related activities, survey respondents were presented with a

416

DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Initial Agency Decision  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2, 2002 2, 2002 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Initial Agency Decision Names of Petitioners: Raymond Gallegos; Andrew Sanchez Date of Filing: July 3, 2001 Case Numbers: VBH-0070; VBH-0071 This Initial Agency Decision concerns a whistleblower complaint filed by Raymond Gallegos and Andrew Sanchez (the Complainants) against their previous employer, Business Environments (BE), under the Department of Energy's (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. BE is a subcontractor that provides office furniture to the DOE's Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in Los Alamos, New Mexico. The complainants worked as furniture installers for BE until they were both terminated on December 11, 2000. The complainants allege that BE terminated them in retaliation for their

417

Decision Summaries | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Decision Summaries Decision Summaries Decision Summaries RSS January 16, 2014 Summary of Decisions - December 30, 2013 - January 3, 2014 Decisions were issued on: - Privacy Act Appeal January 10, 2014 Summary of Decisions - MM DD YYYY - MM DD YYYY Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) December 27, 2013 Summary of Decisions - December 23, 2013 - December 27, 2013 Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) December 20, 2013 Summary of Decisions - December 16, 2013 - December 20, 2013 Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) December 13, 2013 Summary of Decisions - December 9, 2013 - December 13, 2013 Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal

418

Facility Software Quality Assurance for Capital Project Decisions RM  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Facility Software Quality Assurance (SQA) for Facility Software Quality Assurance (SQA) for Capital Project Critical Decisions Review Module March 2010 OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Standard Review Plan (SRP) Facility Software Quality Assurance (SQA) for Capital Project Critical Decisions Review Module Critical Decision (CD) Applicability CD-0 CD-1 CD-2 CD-3 CD-4 Post Operation March 2010 Standard Review Plan, 2 nd Edition, March 2010 FOREWORD The Standard Review Plan (SRP) 1 provides a consistent, predictable corporate review framework to ensure that issues and risks that could challenge the success of Office of Environmental Management (EM) projects are identified early and addressed proactively. The internal EM project review process encompasses key milestones established by DOE O 413.3A, Change 1,

419

Local environmental decision-making with the California environmental quality act: a Santa Barbara case study  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

). The ERC and staff review projects, hold public hearings, and certify environmental documents. Staff support is provided through the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. Decisions on the need for an EIR may be appealed to the City..., it appears that hotel projects generated the most controversy and comments, followed by residential projects. This holds true for both agencies. Commercial projects in the City were also controversial. Since the City projects were often in 30 areas...

Karstadt, Kent Leonard

1985-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

420

Office of Science | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Office of Science Office of Science Project Assessment (OPA) OPA Home About Project Management Processes and Procedures Department of Energy Office of Science Various Project Management Reports Cost & Contingency EDIA Escalation Rates Earned Value Management System (EVMS) Certifications Awards Lessons Learned Tools & Resources SC Projects Other Links SC Federal Project Directors (FPD) and FPD Resources Contact Information Project Assessment U.S. Department of Energy SC-28/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4840 F: (301) 903-8520 E: sc.opa@science.doe.gov Processes and Procedures Office of Science Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page SC Project Management Overview SC Project Decision Matrix .pdf file (86KB), March 2013 Memorandum from W.F. Brinkman: SC is Exempt from DOE Order 413.3B .pdf file

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "hearing officer decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER (OCIO)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

THE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER (OCIO) THE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER (OCIO) FY 2014 HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT PLAN Executive Summary: The mission of the Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO) is to enable the Department of Energy's urgent missions in energy, science, and nuclear security through the power of information and technology in a manner that balances risk with required outcomes in programs that span from open science to national security. DOE promotes effective operations by encouraging performance-based management and facilitating the restructuring of mission- and business-related processes, where appropriate, before making significant IT investments to improve the performance and cost-effectiveness of the Department's information

422

DOE Office of Science - Chicago Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages

spacer spacer spacer spacer About DOE Organization News Contact Us Search Go Button spacer U.S. Department of Energy Science & Technology Energy Sources Energy Efficiency The Environment Prices & Trends National Security Safety & Health spacer Office of Science Chicago Office - Integrated Support Center spacer spacer CURRENT SOLICITATIONS Open Solicitations Unsolicited Proposals spacer spacer BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES Office of Acquisition and Assistance Energy Related Inventions Doing Business with DOE spacer spacer HOW DO I FIND OUT ABOUT? Educational Materials Frequently Asked Questions Links Human Resources Services Office of Chief Counsel spacer spacer COMMUNITY Special Events Laboratory Community Involvement Programs Public Participation Policy Speakers Bureau

423

Office Buildings - Full Report  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

PDF PDF Office Buildings Although no one building type dominates the commercial buildings sector, office buildings are the most common and account for more than 800,000 buildings or 17 percent of total commercial buildings. Offices comprised more than 12 billion square feet of floorspace, 17 percent of total commercial floorspace, the most of any building type. Types of Office Buildings The 2003 CBECS Detailed Tables present data for office buildings along with other principal building activities (see Detailed Tables B13 and B14, for example). Since office buildings comprise a wide range of office-related activities, survey respondents were presented with a follow-up list of specific office types to choose from. Although we have not presented the office sub-category information in the detailed tables we make information

424

Approval of the Critical Decision 4.  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

SUBJECT: ACTION: Approval of the Critical Decision 4 for the Closeout SUBJECT: ACTION: Approval of the Critical Decision 4 for the Closeout of the General Atomics (GA) Hot Cell Facility (HCF) Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D) Project, Project Baseline Summary VL-GA-0012, and the Transfer for the GA Project Files to the Office of Legacy Management (LM) ISSUE: None BACKGROUND: Activities associated with the cleanup of the GA HCF and surrounding site were completed on September 28,2003. The GA site has been remediated to negotiated cleanup standards and released by the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the State of California Department of Health Services Radiological Health Branch (CAL-RHB) to unrestricted use. All project generated waste and legacy spent fuel materials have been dispositioned. GAts Special Nuclear

425

Quality Assurance for Critical Decision Reviews RM  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Quality Assurance for Quality Assurance for Critical Decision Reviews Module March 2010 CD-0 O 0 OFFICE OF Q C CD-1 F ENVIRO Standard R Quality A Rev Critical Decis CD-2 M ONMENTAL Review Plan Assuranc view Module sion (CD) Ap CD March 2010 L MANAGE n (SRP) e (QA) e pplicability D-3 EMENT CD-4 Post Ope eration Standard Review Plan, 2 nd Edition, March 2010 i FOREWORD The Standard Review Plan (SRP) 1 provides a consistent, predictable corporate review framework to ensure that issues and risks that could challenge the success of Office of Environmental Management (EM) projects are identified early and addressed proactively. The internal EM project review process encompasses key milestones established by DOE O 413.3A, Change 1, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, DOE-STD-1189-2008,

426

Building Technologies Office: Subscribe to Building Technologies Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Webinars Webinars Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Building Technologies Office: Subscribe to Building Technologies Office Events and Webinars Updates to someone by E-mail Share Building Technologies Office: Subscribe to Building Technologies Office Events and Webinars Updates on Facebook Tweet about Building Technologies Office: Subscribe to Building Technologies Office Events and Webinars Updates on Twitter Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Subscribe to Building Technologies Office Events and Webinars Updates on Google Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Subscribe to Building Technologies Office Events and Webinars Updates on Delicious Rank Building Technologies Office: Subscribe to Building Technologies Office Events and Webinars Updates on Digg

427

Acquisition of hearing aids and assistive listening devices among the pediatric hearing-impaired population  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Sufficient access to health care is of concern to the indigent population in the US and to their health care providers. This study was undertaken to elucidate the rate of the follow-up among lower socioeconomic hearing-impaired pediatric patients who had received a recommendation for hearing aids and/or assistive listening devices. Our question was, would the families financial situation have a negative effect on the acquisition of hearing aids and assistive listening devices? Fifty patients, age 018 years, who had been seen in our clinic over 2 years were evaluated via a telephone survey. The survey consisted of seven questions, including whether or not the devices or aids were obtained, what type was purchased, where the device was being used, and the childs apparent performance with the device. Eighty-two percent of our patients were on TennCare, a state mandated Medicaid HMO system. Two-thirds of these TennCare patients are at or below the poverty level and the remaining one-third is either disabled or uninsurable according to the Aid for Dependent Children (AFDC) with indeterminate income. In addition the TennCare organization did not cover hearing amplification equipment for these children. The study showed that the majority of the patients did follow-up as recommended. Furthermore, this equipment is easily obtainable for the pediatric indigent population due to financial resources available in the community outside the mandated Medicaid system.

Fannie S Leake; Jerome W Thompson; Erin Simms; James Bailey; Rose Mary S Stocks; Anne M Murphy

2000-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

428

International Studies Office Student travel to Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador and Nicaragua Restricted  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

International Studies Office Student travel to Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador and Nicaragua Committee for Education Abroad has restricted student travel to Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador Salvador, Honduras, and Nicaragua may follow the guidelines documented at: Procedures. The decision

Acton, Scott

429

Computer-Aided Decision Support  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

intelligence technology to help teams achieve remarkable group collaboration and enhance organizational brainstorming and decision-making. The electronic decision analysis...

430

Decision Summaries | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 13, 2013 Summary of Decisions - December 9, 2013 - December 13, 2013 Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)...

431

Decision Summaries | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) December 7, 2012 Summary of Decisions - December 3, 2012 - December 7, 2012 Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR...

432

Decision Science | Argonne National Laboratory  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

to develop and apply the critical decision support methods. Decision support tools help our nation plan our response to potential catastrophes. As a leading developer of these...

433

Building Technologies Office: Resources  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Resources to someone by Resources to someone by E-mail Share Building Technologies Office: Resources on Facebook Tweet about Building Technologies Office: Resources on Twitter Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Resources on Google Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Resources on Delicious Rank Building Technologies Office: Resources on Digg Find More places to share Building Technologies Office: Resources on AddThis.com... About Take Action to Save Energy Partner With DOE Activities Solar Decathlon Building America Home Energy Score Home Performance with ENERGY STAR Better Buildings Neighborhood Program Challenge Home Partner Log In Become a Partner Criteria Partner Locator Resources Housing Innovation Awards Events Guidelines for Home Energy Professionals Technology Research, Standards, & Codes

434

Vehicle Technologies Office: Ambassadors  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Ambassadors to someone Ambassadors to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: Ambassadors on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: Ambassadors on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: Ambassadors on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: Ambassadors on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: Ambassadors on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: Ambassadors on AddThis.com... Goals Research & Development Testing and Analysis Workplace Charging Partners Ambassadors Resources Community and Fleet Readiness Workforce Development Plug-in Electric Vehicle Basics Ambassadors Workplace Charging Challenge Clean Cities Coalitions Clean Cities logo. Clean Cities National: A network of nearly 100 Clean Cities coalitions, supported by the

435

by Sharon Butler, Office of Public Affairs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

20, 1998 20, 1998 Number 4 by Sharon Butler, Office of Public Affairs With budget surpluses on the horizon for the first time since Neil Armstrong stepped onto the moon (as the New York Times noted), members of the scientific community met in Washington to hear how the field of physics might fare when the nation's red ink turns to black. At URA's Council of Presidents Annual Meeting Cautious Optimism Over Future Funding for Science Congressional representatives and Administration officials address policy forum. continued on page 2 f INSIDE 5 Budget 6 University Close-up: Boston Universities 9 Awards 10 Accelerator Update Representatives of URA's 87 member universities attended the organization's annual meeting and policy forum. At the annual meeting and policy forum of the Universities Research Association, Inc.,

436

Anthropic decision theory  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This paper sets out to solve the Sleeping Beauty problem and various related anthropic (self-locating belief) problems, not through the calculation of anthropic probabilities, but through finding the correct decision to make. Given certain simple assumptions, it turns out to be possible to do so without knowing the underlying anthropic probabilities. Most common anthropic problems are underspecified from the decision perspective, and this can explain some of the differing intuitions in the subject: selfless and selfish agents, total and average utilitarians, will all reach different decisions in the same problem. These results are formalised into an anthropic decision theory, that is then used to solve many anthropic problems and paradoxes, such as the Presumptuous Philosopher, Adam and Eve, and Doomsday problems.

Stuart Armstrong

2011-10-28T23:59:59.000Z

437

Risks of Risk Decisions  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...manuscript. 17. B. Fischhoff, P. Slovic, S. Lichtenstein, S. Read, B. Combs, Policy Sci...Perspectives on Benefit-Risk Decision Making...20. P. Slovic, B. Fischhoff, S. Lichtenstein, in So-cietal Risk Assessment: How Safe...

Chauncey Starr; Chris Whipple

1980-06-06T23:59:59.000Z

438

Multi-Decision-Makers Equalizer: A Multiobjective Decision Support System for Multiple Decision-Makers  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

In this paper we present a decision support system that helps to solve multiobjective decision problems considering a multi decision-makers framework. By an iterative procedure this system looks for a single s...

Patricia Jaramillo; Ricardo A. Smith; Joaqun Andru

2005-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

439

Bayesian decision theoryBayesian decision theory Jean Daunizeau  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Bayesian decision theoryBayesian decision theory Jean Daunizeau Wellcome Trust CentreFromstatisticalinferencetostatisticaldecision...... estimationmotivationmotivation conclusionBayesian Decision Theory (i) What do we do with posterior pdfs? (ii) How can we learn:Expectedutilitytheory: existenceofautilityfunctionexistenceofautilityfunction estimationmotivationmotivation conclusionBayesian Decision Theory hypothesis testing

Daunizeau, Jean

440

Decision Making, Movement Planning,1 and Statistical Decision Theory2  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Decision Making, Movement Planning,1 and Statistical Decision Theory2 3 4 Julia Trommershäuser1 decision theory, expected utility theory35 #12;2 36 Abstract37 We discuss behavioral studies directed the behavioral39 tasks in the language of statistical decision theory, we can compare performance in40 equivalent

Maloney, Laurence T.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "hearing officer decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Office of Information Resources  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

US Department of Energy US Department of Energy FOIA/PA Contact List Operations Offices Chicago Office Privacy Act Officer FOIA Officer Miriam Legan Miriam Legan U.S. Department of Energy Chicago Office 9800 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 miriam.legan@ch.doe.gov Phone: 630-252-2041 Fax: 630-252-2183 U.S. Department of Energy Chicago Office 9800 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 miriam.legan@ch.doe.gov Phone: 630-252-2041 Fax: 630-252-2183 Idaho Operations Office Clayton Ogilvie Clayton Ogilvie U.S. Department of Energy 1955 Fremont Ave. MS 1203 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401 Phone: (208) 526-5190 Fax: 208-526-8789 U.S. Department of Energy 1955 Fremont Ave. MS 1203 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401 Phone: (208) 526-5190 Fax: 208-526-8789 Oak Ridge Office Amy Rothrock Amy Rothrock

442

Office of Information Resources  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Freedom of Information and Privacy Act Database Freedom of Information and Privacy Act Database Bureau: DOE-ID Project Unique ID: Date: May 8,2008 A. CONTACT INFORMATION 1. Who is the person completing this document? Nicole Brooks Title: FOIA/PA Officer Organization: DOE-ID Public Affairs Office Address: 1955 N. Fremont Ave, MS 1203 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415 2. Who is the system owner? Nicole Brooks, FOIA/PA Officer U.S. DOE, Idaho Operations Office DOE-ID Public Affairs Office Address: 1955 N. Fremont Ave, MS 1203 Idaho Falls, Idaho 834 15 3. Who is the system manager for this system o r application? Nicole Brooks, FOIA/PA Officer U.S. DOE, Idaho Operations Office DOE-ID Public Affairs Office Address: 1955 N. Fremont Ave, MS 1203 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415 4. Who is the IT Security Manager who reviewed this document?

443

Golden Field Office  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

The Golden Field Office was designated a Department of Energy field office in December 1992 to provide EERE with enhanced capability to develop and commercialize renewable energy and energy...

444

Office of Strategic Programs  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

The mission of the Office of Strategic Programs is to increase the overall effectiveness and impact of all of the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy's (EERE's) activities. We do this...

445

Office of Information Resources  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Billing System Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Billing System Bureau: Department of Energy Project Unique ID: 01 9-1 0-01 -22-02-3048-00 Date: 02/08/2008 A. CONTACT INFORMATION 1) Who is the person completing this document? Joanne Csordas (HS-1.21), Office of Business Operations, Office of Resource Management, Office of Health, Safety and Security, U.S. Department of Energy, HS-1.21, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington D.C. 20585, (301) 903-3573 2) Who is the system owner? Joanne Csordas (HS-1.2 l), Office of Business Operations, Office of Resource Management, Office of Health, Safety and Security, U.S. Department of Energy, HS- 1.2 1, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington D.C. 20585, (301) 903-3573 3) Who is the system manager for this system or application?

446

Office of the Chief Financial Officer Annual Report 2013  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

by the Director, Office of Science of the U.S. Department oftration (NNSA) - Office of Science collaboration for the$13M Decrease Office of Science Office of Science (SC) O&M

Williams, Kim

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

447

Office of the Chief Information Officer DOERM@hq.doe.gov Office...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Office of the Chief Information Officer DOERM@hq.doe.gov Office of IT Planning, Architecture and E-government Records Management Division (IM-23) Employee Separation:...

448

Savannah River Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Concurrence: 'WcVlUi. Date: - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - Charles C. Harris, Director, Performance Assurance Division J rey M. Allison, Director, Office of...

449

EIS-0454: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Record of Decision Record of Decision EIS-0454: Record of Decision Tonopah Solar Energy, LLC, Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project (September 2011) For more information, contact: Ms. Angela Colamaria, DOE NEPA Document Manager Environmental Compliance Division Loan Programs Office (LP-10) U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW. Washington, DC 20585 Telephone: 202-287-5387 Electronic mail: Angela.Colamaria@hq.doe.gov DOE announces its decision to issue a Federal loan guarantee under Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 05), as amended by Section 406 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act), to Tonopah Solar Energy, LLC (TSE), for construction and start-up of the Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project (the Project). The Project is a proposed 110-megawatt solar power generating facility

450

EIS-0220: Supplemental Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EIS-0220: Supplemental Record of Decision EIS-0220: Supplemental Record of Decision EIS-0220: Supplemental Record of Decision Interim Management of Nuclear Materials at the Savannah River Site The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) prepared a final environmental impact statement (EIS), ''Interim Management of Nuclear Materials'' (DOE/EIS-0220, October 20, 1995), to assess the potential environmental impacts of actions necessary to manage nuclear materials at the Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, South Carolina, until decisions on their ultimate disposition are made and implemented. Some of the particular materials considered in the EIS could present environment, safety and health vulnerabilities in their current storage condition. DOE/EIS-0220, Savannah River Operations Office; Interim Management of

451

UC Sustainability Office Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 UC Sustainability Office Report Introduction Welcome to the second annual UC Sustainability Office Report. 2012 saw the Sustainability Office focus its attentions on enhancing the student experience and building on UC's statement of strategic intent of `people prepared to make a difference'. We

Hickman, Mark

452

Office of Headquarters Security Operations | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Headquarters Security Headquarters Security Operations Office of Headquarters Security Operations Mission The Office of Headquarters Security Operations strengthens national security by protecting personnel, facilities, property, classified information, and sensitive unclassified information for DOE Headquarters facilities in the National Capital Area under normal and abnormal (i.e., emergency) conditions; managing access authorization functions; ensuring that executives and dignitaries are fully protected, and supporting efforts to ensure the continuity of government in all circumstances as mandated by Presidential Decision Directive. The Office is the database owner for the principal personnel security information processing activities of the Department and personnel security administrative review process.

453

EIS-0236: Record of Decision  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Record of Decision Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Stockpile Stewardship and Management

454

EIS-0217: Record of Decision  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Savannah River Site Waste Management, Savannah Rive Operations Office, Aiken, South Carolina (October 1995)

455

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

REPORTING REQUIREMENTS REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Reporting Requirements Matrix Special Message from the Corporate Investigations Office REPORTING PERSONNEL SECURITY CONCERNS If you report an incident of security concern involving yourself or a coworker, you must do so in writing with signature and date. Your report should contain factual and comprehensive information regarding the incident. A good rule of thumb is to ask yourself did I cover the "Who, What, When, Where, and How." If you did, your report will most likely provide all of the necessary information needed by personnel security to render an adjudicative action or decision. FSO Reporting Responsibilities List of company changes that need to be reported by the FSO. SF 2730-NCB, Name Change Request DOE F 5631.29, Security Termination Statement

456

Proposition of a damage?risk?number for hearing conservation purpose  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Standards dealing with hearing impairment due to noise exposure define risk in an ambiguous and not quantitative way. (See for example ISO/R 19991971 p. 6.) These definitions have been thrown on from statistical methods and involve by themselves computational procedures. In the proposition presented here it is suggested as a single number a function of the variables noise level exposure period personal sensibility age work period previous experience previous hearing damage and clinical illness tendency. Function is developed with statistical procedures according population distribution and individual characteristics. Number is given in percent but can be used in decimal form. The number will serve to qualify a worker fitness against noise in a certain task to establish noise hazards to men in a certain industrial or urban zone to determine exposure grade to traffic noise to establish decision criterion to industrial noise control or to fix premiums for insurance payment in case of a handicap or a loss of heating ability due to work.

F. Groenewold

1976-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

457

WHAT'S NEW FOR CONTRACTING OFFICERS  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

CHAPTER 42.101 WHAT'S NEW FOR CONTRACTING OFFICERS The Contracting Officer must obtain a waiver from the Procurement Director...

458

Building Technologies Office Overview  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Roland Risser Roland Risser Director, Building Technologies Office Building Technologies Office Energy Efficiency Starts Here. 2 Building Technologies Office Integrated Approach: Improving Building Performance Research & Development Developing High Impact Technologies Standards & Codes Locking in the Savings Market Stimulation Accelerating Tech-to- Market 3 Building Technologies Office Goal: Reduce building energy use by 50% (compared to a 2010 baseline) 4 Building Technologies Office Working to Overcome Challenges Information Access * Develop building performance tools, techniques, and success stories, such as case studies * Form market partnerships and programs to share best practices * Solution Centers * Certify the workforce to ensure quality work

459

We Want to Hear From You: Live Twitter Q&A Tuesday at Noon | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

We Want to Hear From You: Live Twitter Q&A Tuesday at Noon We Want to Hear From You: Live Twitter Q&A Tuesday at Noon We Want to Hear From You: Live Twitter Q&A Tuesday at Noon March 19, 2012 - 11:07am Addthis Visit twitter.com/energy to join our live Twitter Q&A on Tuesday, March 20, at noon ET. Visit twitter.com/energy to join our live Twitter Q&A on Tuesday, March 20, at noon ET. Erin R. Pierce Erin R. Pierce Digital Communications Specialist, Office of Public Affairs How can I participate? To join our live Q&A, visit twitter.com/energy on March 20 at 12 PM ET. Submit questions in advance by tweeting your question to @ENERGY using the #askENERGY hashtag. Have questions about our efforts to promote alternative fuels, advanced vehicles, and fuel efficiency? Then join us at 12PM ET on Tuesday, March

460

We Want to Hear From You: Live Twitter Q&A Tuesday at Noon | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Want to Hear From You: Live Twitter Q&A Tuesday at Noon Want to Hear From You: Live Twitter Q&A Tuesday at Noon We Want to Hear From You: Live Twitter Q&A Tuesday at Noon March 19, 2012 - 11:07am Addthis Visit twitter.com/energy to join our live Twitter Q&A on Tuesday, March 20, at noon ET. Visit twitter.com/energy to join our live Twitter Q&A on Tuesday, March 20, at noon ET. Erin R. Pierce Erin R. Pierce Digital Communications Specialist, Office of Public Affairs How can I participate? To join our live Q&A, visit twitter.com/energy on March 20 at 12 PM ET. Submit questions in advance by tweeting your question to @ENERGY using the #askENERGY hashtag. Have questions about our efforts to promote alternative fuels, advanced vehicles, and fuel efficiency? Then join us at 12PM ET on Tuesday, March

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "hearing officer decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

UWM CIO Office Feedback on  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Accounts Receivable General Accounting Svcs. Cashier's Office Purchasing Office Travel Office Total Receivable 0 0 2 7 3 4 General Accounting Svcs. 0 1 2 8 5 0 Cashiers Office 0 0 3 3 2 8 Purchasing Office 2 6UWM CIO Office Feedback on The Department of Business & Financial Services Presentation of Results

Saldin, Dilano

462

Building Technologies Office: News  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

News to someone by News to someone by E-mail Share Building Technologies Office: News on Facebook Tweet about Building Technologies Office: News on Twitter Bookmark Building Technologies Office: News on Google Bookmark Building Technologies Office: News on Delicious Rank Building Technologies Office: News on Digg Find More places to share Building Technologies Office: News on AddThis.com... Popular Links Success Stories Previous Next Lighten Energy Loads with System Design. Warming Up to Pump Heat. Cut Refrigerator Energy Use to Save Money. Tools EnergyPlus Whole Building Simulation Program Building Energy Software Tools Directory High Performance Buildings Database Financial Opportunities Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Funding Opportunities Tax Incentives for Residential Buildings

463

Office of Nuclear Safety  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Office of Nuclear Safety (HS-30) Office of Nuclear Safety (HS-30) Office of Nuclear Safety Home » Directives » Nuclear and Facility Safety Policy Rules » Nuclear Safety Workshops Technical Standards Program » Search » Approved Standards » Recently Approved » RevCom for TSP » Monthly Status Reports » Archive » Feedback DOE Nuclear Safety Research & Development Program Office of Nuclear Safety Basis & Facility Design (HS-31) Office of Nuclear Safety Basis & Facility Design - About Us » Nuclear Policy Technical Positions/Interpretations » Risk Assessment Working Group » Criticality Safety » DOE O 420.1C Facility Safety » Beyond Design Basis Events Office of Nuclear Facility Safety Programs (HS-32) Office of Nuclear Facility Safety Programs - About Us

464

Vehicle Technologies Office: News  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

News News Site Map Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Vehicle Technologies Office: News to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: News on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: News on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: News on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: News on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: News on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: News on AddThis.com... Vehicle Technologies News Blog Newsletters Information for Media Subscribe to News Updates News December 18, 2013 USDA Offers $118 Million for Renewable Energy, Smart Grid Projects The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced $73 million in funding for renewable energy projects and $45 million for smart grid technology as

465

DOE NEPA Compliance Officers  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NEPA Compliance Officers NEPA Compliance Officers NEPA Compliance Officers are listed first for Program Offices, then Power Marketing Administrations, then Field Offices. Please send updates to yardena.mansoor@hq.doe.gov Oct 04, 2013 Forrestal (FORS) Addresses: Germantown (GTN) Addresses: 1000 Independence Ave SW 1000 Independence Ave SW Washington, DC 20585 Washington, DC 20585-1290 . Use for U.S. Postal Service mail. 19901 Germantown Road Germantown, MD 20874-1290 Use for EXPRESS DELIVERY (e.g. Federal Express, UPS). NAME, OFFICE, E-MAIL FAX ADDRESS PHONE william.bierbower@hq.doe.gov Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy 202-287-6585 FORS AR-1 20585 ARPA-E William Bierbower lori.gray@go.doe.gov Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office 720-356-1568 720-356-1350 Department of Energy

466

Vehicle Technologies Office: Deployment  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Deployment Deployment Site Map Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Vehicle Technologies Office: Deployment to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: Deployment on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: Deployment on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: Deployment on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: Deployment on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: Deployment on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: Deployment on AddThis.com... Energy Policy Act (EPAct) Clean Cities Educational Activities Deployment Our nation's energy security depends on the efficiency of our transportation system and on which fuels we use. Transportation in the United States already consumes much more oil than we produce here at home

467

Office 2007 User Workshop  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Office 2007 User Workshop Office 2007 User Workshop M. Westbrook, APS-IT June 30, 2010 Goal: Quick Start for New Office 2007 Users Introduce and highlight new Office 2007 program feature (Word, Excel and PowerPoint) Identify sources of help with Office 2007 Provide opportunity for users to share experiences Office 2007: Introduction  Format for today's presentation is that of a workshop rather than training course  Many of the new features presented here apply to multiple Office applications  Sources for more information are identified throughout the presentation  Presenter is no expert, but plans to share what has been learned thus far  Attendees are encouraged to share what you have learned for the benefit of all

468

Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy of Vestibular Schwannomas Accelerates Hearing Loss  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Objective: To evaluate long-term tumor control and hearing preservation rates in patients with vestibular schwannoma treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), comparing hearing preservation rates to an untreated control group. The relationship between radiation dose to the cochlea and hearing preservation was also investigated. Methods and Materials: Forty-two patients receiving FSRT between 1997 and 2008 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included. All patients received 54 Gy in 27-30 fractions during 5.5-6.0 weeks. Clinical and audiometry data were collected prospectively. From a 'wait-and-scan' group, 409 patients were selected as control subjects, matched by initial audiometric parameters. Radiation dose to the cochlea was measured using the original treatment plan and then related to changes in acoustic parameters. Results: Actuarial 2-, 4-, and 10-year tumor control rates were 100%, 91.5%, and 85.0%, respectively. Twenty-one patients had serviceable hearing before FSRT, 8 of whom (38%) retained serviceable hearing at 2 years after FSRT. No patients retained serviceable hearing after 10 years. At 2 years, hearing preservation rates in the control group were 1.8 times higher compared with the group receiving FSRT (P=.007). Radiation dose to the cochlea was significantly correlated to deterioration of the speech reception threshold (P=.03) but not to discrimination loss. Conclusion: FSRT accelerates the naturally occurring hearing loss in patients with vestibular schwannoma. Our findings, using fractionation of radiotherapy, parallel results using single-dose radiation. The radiation dose to the cochlea is correlated to hearing loss measured as the speech reception threshold.

Rasmussen, Rune, E-mail: rune333@gmail.com [Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark)] [Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark); Claesson, Magnus [Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark)] [Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark); Stangerup, Sven-Eric [Ear, Nose, and Throat Department, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark)] [Ear, Nose, and Throat Department, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark); Roed, Henrik [Department of Radiation Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark)] [Department of Radiation Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark); Christensen, Ib Jarle [Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark)] [Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark); Caye-Thomasen, Per [Ear, Nose, and Throat Department, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark)] [Ear, Nose, and Throat Department, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark); Juhler, Marianne [Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark)] [Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark)

2012-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

469

Fan Energy Savings Decisions  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Axial fans are used for thousands of industrial applications consuming millions of kilowatts daily. The decision that saves dollars is to either automatically change fan speed or change blade pitch to save up to 50 percent of consumed power over a...

Monroe, R. C.

470

Building Technologies Office: News  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

News to someone by News to someone by E-mail Share Building Technologies Office: News on Facebook Tweet about Building Technologies Office: News on Twitter Bookmark Building Technologies Office: News on Google Bookmark Building Technologies Office: News on Delicious Rank Building Technologies Office: News on Digg Find More places to share Building Technologies Office: News on AddThis.com... About Standards & Test Procedures Implementation, Certification & Enforcement Rulemakings & Notices Further Guidance ENERGY STAR® Popular Links Success Stories Previous Next Lighten Energy Loads with System Design. Learn More. Warming Up to Pump Heat. Learn More. Cut Refrigerator Energy Use to Save Money. Learn More. News DOE Publishes Petition of CSA Group for Classification as a Nationally

471

Vehicle Technologies Office: Favorites  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Favorites to someone by Favorites to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: Favorites on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: Favorites on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: Favorites on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: Favorites on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: Favorites on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: Favorites on AddThis.com... Favorites #248 Top Ten Net Petroleum Importing Countries, 2000 December 23, 2002 #246 U.S. Oil Imports - Top 10 Countries of Origin December 9, 2002 #244 Sport Utility Vehicle Spotlight November 25, 2002 #243 Fuel Economy Leaders for 2003 Model Year Light Trucks November 18, 2002 #242 Fuel Economy Leaders for 2003 Model Year Cars November 11, 2002 #238 Automobile and Truck Population by Vehicle Age, 2001 October 14, 2002

472

Vehicle Technologies Office: Partners  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Partners to someone by Partners to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: Partners on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: Partners on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: Partners on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: Partners on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: Partners on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: Partners on AddThis.com... Goals Research & Development Testing and Analysis Workplace Charging Partners Ambassadors Resources Community and Fleet Readiness Workforce Development Plug-in Electric Vehicle Basics Partners The interactive map below highlights Workplace Charging Challenge Partners across the country who are installing plug-in electric vehicle charging infrastructure for their employees. Select a worksite to learn more about

473

Vehicle Technologies Office: Lubricants  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Lubricants to someone by Lubricants to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: Lubricants on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: Lubricants on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: Lubricants on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: Lubricants on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: Lubricants on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: Lubricants on AddThis.com... Just the Basics Hybrid & Vehicle Systems Energy Storage Advanced Power Electronics & Electrical Machines Advanced Combustion Engines Fuels & Lubricants Fuel Effects on Combustion Lubricants Natural Gas Research Biofuels End-Use Research Materials Technologies Lubricants As most vehicles are on the road for more than 15 years before they are retired, investigating technologies that will improve today's vehicles is

474

Office of Information Resources  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Bureau of Investigations Billing System Federal Bureau of Investigations Billing System Bureau: Department of Energy Project Unique ID: 01 9-10-01 -22-02-3028-00 Date: 02/08/2008 A. CONTACT INFORMATION 1) Who is the person completing this document? Joanne Csordas (HS-1.21), Office of Business Operations, Office of Resource Management, Office of Health, Safety and Security, U.S. Department of Energy, HS-1.21, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington D.C. 20585, (301) 903-3573 2) Who is the system owner? Joanne Csordas (HS-1.21), Office of Business Operations, Office of Resource Management, Office of Health, Safety and Security, U.S. Department of Energy, HS-1.21, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington D.C. 20585, (301) 903-3573 3) Who is the system manager for this system or application?

475

Office Buildings - Energy Consumption  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Energy Consumption Energy Consumption Office buildings consumed more than 17 percent of the total energy used by the commercial buildings sector (Table 4). At least half of total energy, electricity, and natural gas consumed by office buildings was consumed by administrative or professional office buildings (Figure 2). Table 4. Energy Consumed by Office Buildings for Major Fuels, 2003 All Buildings Total Energy Consumption (trillion Btu) Number of Buildings (thousand) Total Floorspace (million sq. ft.) Sum of Major Fuels Electricity Natural Gas Fuel Oil District Heat All Buildings 4,859 71,658 6,523 3,559 2,100 228 636 All Non-Mall Buildings 4,645 64,783 5,820 3,037 1,928 222 634 All Office Buildings 824 12,208 1,134 719 269 18 128 Type of Office Building

476

DEPARTMENT OF I Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

I I Office of ENERGY Science SLAC Site Office SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 2575 Sand Hill Road, MS-8A Menlo Park, CA 94025 DATE: January 11, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR: Joseph A. McBrearty Deputy Director of Field Operations Office of Science FROM: Paul Gola Site a r SLAC Site Office SUBJECT: Annual National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Planning Summary for 2012, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory The purpose of this memorandum is to transmit the Annual National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Planning Summary for 2012 for the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC), in accordance with the June 1994 Secretarial Policy Statement on NEPA and Department of Energy Order 451.1B. The SLAC Site Office (SSO) has reviewed ongoing and planned activities at the site and determined, in consultation with the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer, that there is one NEPA Environmental Assessment

477

Vehicle Technologies Office: Batteries  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Batteries to someone by Batteries to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: Batteries on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: Batteries on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: Batteries on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: Batteries on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: Batteries on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: Batteries on AddThis.com... Just the Basics Hybrid & Vehicle Systems Energy Storage Batteries Battery Systems Applied Battery Research Long-Term Exploratory Research Ultracapacitors Advanced Power Electronics & Electrical Machines Advanced Combustion Engines Fuels & Lubricants Materials Technologies Batteries battery/cell diagram Battery/Cell Diagram Batteries are important to our everyday lives and show up in various

478

Proposed fiscal year 1985 budget request. Hearings before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, Ninety-Eighth Congress, Second Session, February 7, 8 and 9, 1984  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Interior Secretary Clark, Energy Secretary Hodel, and representatives of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Synthetic Fuels Corporation, and the Forest Service testified at three days of hearings on the President's budget proposal for fiscal year 1985. The hearings were part of the preparation for a March 15 report to the Senate Budget Committee. The Department of the Interior's request for $6.49 billion is $100 million below the 1984 level, which Clark attributes to a review of policy, personnel, and process (decision making and operation). The DOE budget request is $15.1 billion, which includes $1.9 billion to acquire oil and transport it to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. The hearing record includes the testimony and seven appendices with additional comments and responses submitted for the record.

Not Available

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

479

Interference effects and phase sensitivity in hearing  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...case was too short to allow selective listening in the dips. Probably, in this case...across-channel comparator. (4) A decision device. It was assumed that performance depended...1989 Headphone simulation of free field listening. I. Stimulus synthesis. J. Acoust...

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

480

Attacks on computers: Congressional hearings and pending legislation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

During the First Session of the 98th Congress, several days of hearings were held on the activities of computer enthusiasts including the Milwaukee 414s and others. The First Session also saw the introduction in the House of six bills dealing with various aspects and computer crime. A summary of those hearings, along with a summary of the pending computer crime bills, will be presented.

Bailey, D.

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "hearing officer decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

A wireless volume control receiver for hearing aids  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

) Robert DeOtte ember) ~ Jolte Pineda Gyvez (Me r) Alt n Patton (Head o Department) August 1993 ABSTRACT A Wireless Volume Control Receiver for Hearing Aids. (August 1993) Alexander Herve Reyes, B. S. , Texas A&M University Chair of Advisory... Committee: Dr. Edgar Sdnchez ? Sinencio Hearing aids have been greatly improved over the past few years because of better technology and more innovative ideas. Today, these devices are smaller in size, consume less power and some can be programmed to fit...

Reyes, Alexander Herve

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

482

Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

FY 2008 DOE Vehicle FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review on AddThis.com... Publications

483

Building Technologies Office Overview  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

data * Utilize energy performance data to inform decision making * Improve measurement and track and analyze results TECHNOLOGY TO MARKET TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 5...

484

Media & Communications Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Media & Communications Office Media & Communications Office Newsroom Photos Image Library Historic Images Photo Permissions Videos Fact Sheets Lab History News Categories Contacts Media & Communications Office news Part of the Community, Education, Government & Public Affairs Directorate, the Media & Communications Office provides information about Brookhaven National Laboratory to internal and external audiences through numerous communications vehicles. Our staff promotes Brookhaven's international reputation as a center for scientific excellence and innovation. We also publicize information about Laboratory events, policies and procedures. News Releases Media and Communications prepares all of the news releases on the Laboratory's science discoveries, announcements, events, and awards.

485

Argonne Site Office Jobs  

Office of Science (SC) Website

asoaboutjobs Below is a list of currently open federal employment opportunities in the Office of Science. Prospective applicants should follow the links to the formal position...

486

SLAC Site Office Jobs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

ssoaboutjobs Below is a list of currently open federal employment opportunities in the Office of Science. Prospective applicants should follow the links to the formal position...

487

Golden Field Office Contacts  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Field contacts at the U.S. Department of Energy's Golden Field Office who support the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)

488

Oak Ridge Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

, 2010 Mr. Ron Murphree, Chair Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board Post Office Box 200 1 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Dear Mr. Murphree: IN RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION 189:...

489

Oak Ridge Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6, 2010 Mr. Ron Murphree, Chair Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board Post Office Box 2001 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Dear Mr. Murphree: RECOMMENDATION 191: RECOMMENDATION...

490

Oak Ridge Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

, 2010 Mr. Ron Murphree, Chair Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board Post Office Box 200 1 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Dear Mr. Murphree: IN RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION 187:...

491

Oak Ridge Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

- June 10, 2009 Mr. Steve Dixon, Chairman Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board Post Office Box 2001 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Dear Mr. Dixon: RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATIONS...

492

Vehicle Technologies Office: News  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

EERE intends to issue, on behalf of its Fuel Cell Technologies Office, a Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) entitled "Fuel Cell Technologies Incubator: Innovations in Fuel Cell and Hydrogen...

493

Office of the Director  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Dr. Bochenek, G. Deputy: Klara, S. Chief Operating Officer: Zeh, C. Senior Operations Advisor: Monahan, M. SMTA: Duda, J. EEO Manager: Vargas, N. Supervisory Administrative...

494

Office of Science  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

icon-science.jpg Office of Science Enabling remarkable discoveries and tools that transform our understanding of energy and matter and advance national, economic, and energy...