Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "guidance statement operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

EPA -- Amended Environmental Impact Statement Filing System Guidance |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Amended Environmental Impact Statement Filing System Amended Environmental Impact Statement Filing System Guidance EPA -- Amended Environmental Impact Statement Filing System Guidance Amended Environmental Impact Statement Filing System Guidance for Implementing 40 CFR 1506.9 and 1506.10 of the Council on Environmental Quality's Regulations Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act The purpose of the EPA Filing System Guidelines is to provide guidance to federal agencies on filing draft, final, and supplemental EISs. Information is provided on: (1) how to file an EIS; (2) the steps to follow when adopting an EIS, or when an EIS is withdrawn, delayed or reopened; (3) public review periods; (4) issuance of notices of availability in the Federal Register; and (5) retention of filed EISs. These updated guidelines

2

EPA -- Amended Environmental Impact Statement Filing System Guidance |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EPA -- Amended Environmental Impact Statement Filing System EPA -- Amended Environmental Impact Statement Filing System Guidance EPA -- Amended Environmental Impact Statement Filing System Guidance Amended Environmental Impact Statement Filing System Guidance for Implementing 40 CFR 1506.9 and 1506.10 of the Council on Environmental Quality's Regulations Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act The purpose of the EPA Filing System Guidelines is to provide guidance to federal agencies on filing draft, final, and supplemental EISs. Information is provided on: (1) how to file an EIS; (2) the steps to follow when adopting an EIS, or when an EIS is withdrawn, delayed or reopened; (3) public review periods; (4) issuance of notices of availability in the Federal Register; and (5) retention of filed EISs. These updated guidelines

3

Guidance for evaluation of operational emergency plans  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this document is to provide guidance for development of emergency plans for the USDOE Office of Defense Programs, Office of Energy Research, and Office of Environmental Management facilities. It gathers emergency planning policy and guidance from applicable federal regulations, DOE Orders and related guidance documents. This material, along with recommended good practices, is presented as a checklist against which emergency plans can be reviewed by DOE Headquarters. The Office of Emergency Response (DP-23), Office of Environment, Safety and Health Technical Support (ER-8), and Office of Transportation, Emergency Management and Analytical Services (EM-26) will use this checklist to evaluate plans submitted by DP, ER, and EM field elements. The scope of this document encompasses plans for operational emergencies at DOE facilities, both nuclear and non-nuclear. Operational emergencies, as defined in Attachment 2 to DOE Order 5500.1B (April 30, 1991) are ``significant accidents, incidents, events, or natural phenomena which seriously degrade the safety or security of DOE facilities. Operational Emergencies apply to DOE reactors and other DOE facilities (nuclear and non-nuclear) involved with hazardous materials; DOE-controlled nuclear weapons, components, or test devices; DOE safeguards and security events; and transportation accidents involving hazardous materials under DOE control.``

NONE

1995-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

4

Guidance For Preparatioon of Basis For Interim Operation (BIO) Documents  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3011-2002 3011-2002 December 2002 Superceding DOE-STD-3011-94 November 1994 DOE STANDARD GUIDANCE FOR PREPARATION OF BASIS FOR INTERIM OPERATION (BIO) DOCUMENTS U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-3011-2002 ii This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161;

5

Enforcement Guidance Supplement (EGS 00-02) - Operational Procedures...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND INVESTIGATION SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-02: Price-Anderson Amendment Act (PAAA) Program Reviews Section 1.3 of the Operational...

6

Targeted Observations to Improve Operational Tropical Cyclone Track Forecast Guidance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Since 1997, the Tropical Prediction Center and the Hurricane Research Division have conducted operational synoptic surveillance missions with a Gulfstream IV-SP jet aircraft to improve numerical forecast guidance. Due to limited aircraft ...

Sim D. Aberson

2003-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

7

SUBJECT: Statement of Clearance - Decontamination Op'erations;  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Statement of Clearance - Decontamination Op'erations; Statement of Clearance - Decontamination Op'erations; Raritan Arsenal TO: Comtnanding General U. S. Army Supply and Maintenance Command ,kTTN: iii-LSSM.-S" * 9T ;/ i-~'-~-.-y/"+,,y-- Washingto,n, D. C. 20315 ;l. Reference: ~Paragraph 5b, AR 405-90. : : 2. Forwarded for approval are a.Stateinent of Clearance afld supporting 'documents covering the decontamination of the Ammuhition Arca at Raritan Arsellal, Mctuchen, New Jersey. I I 3. Transl%ittal of the Statement of Clearance was deferred pend- iny, the removal of the scrap material from the Arsenal, referred to in pa'ragraph 6 of CMT 1 of the supporting documents. This action was completed 5 December 1963. i 4. The Statement-of Clearance and supporting documents 'Bre to be forwaided to District Engineer, New York District, 80 Lafayette Street,

8

Detroit Edison Comments on NRC Guidance for Operability Determinations  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

with the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) in the preparation of industry comments on the draft revision to NRC Manual Chapter 9900. Detroit Edison appreciates the efforts by NRC staff to update and clarify the guidance for operability determinations and the opportunity to provide comments prior to final issuance. Detroit Edison concurs with the specific comments on the referenced Federal Register notice provided by NEI and the associated recommendation that the NRC continue public dialogue on this topic. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (734) 586-4258. Sincerely, Norman K. Peterson

Detroit Edison; Washington D C; Detroit Edison; Has Participated

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

9

DOE-HDBK-5504-95; Guidance for Evaluation of Operational Emergency Plans  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5504-95 5504-95 March 1995 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDANCE FOR EVALUATION OF OPERATIONAL EMERGENCY PLANS U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE95012002 DOE-HDBK-5504-95 iii FOREWORD This handbook incorporates emergency planning information from the following EPA and OSHA regulations:

10

Internal Controls Guidance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Internal Controls Guidance Internal Controls Guidance Internal Controls Guidance Guidance required to be implemented by Departmental elements to meet the requirements of the Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act (FMFIA), as described in Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-123, Management's Responsibility for Internal Control. This guidance provides instructions for conducting internal controls evaluations and help ensure the Secretary's annual Statement of Assurance is accurate and adequately supported. Internal Control Evaluations Guidance More Documents & Publications Re: DOE Request for Information - Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities To Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy Request for Information - Operations and Maintenance (O & M) Support

11

Guidance & Opinions | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hiring Process Guidance on Inherently Governmental Functions Guidance on Electric Vehicle Recharging Stations Employment Discrimination EEO Policy and Diversity Statement DOE...

12

EIS-0380: Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

380: Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued 380: Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico EIS-0380: Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico Summary This Site-Wide EIS evaluates the continued operation of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). NNSA identified and assessed three alternatives for continued operation of LANL: (1) No Action, (2) Reduced Operations, and (3) Expanded Operations. Public Comment Opportunities No public comment opportunities available at this time. Documents Available for Download May 20, 2013 EIS-0380: Mitigation Action Plan Annual Report Los Alamos National Laboratory Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement Fiscal Year 2012 Mitigation Action Plan Annual Report

13

EIS-0466: Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Ongoing Operations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6: Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Ongoing 6: Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Ongoing Operations at Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico EIS-0466: Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Ongoing Operations at Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico Summary This Site-Wide EIS evaluates the continued operation of the DOE/NNSA activities at Sandia National Laboratories. The SWEIS will consider a No Action Alternative, which is to continue current operations through implementation of the 1999 Record of Decision and subsequent NEPA decisions, and three action alternatives proposed for consideration. Public Comment Opportunities No public comment opportunities available at this time. Documents Available for Download August 12, 2011 EIS-0466: Re-opening of Public Scoping Period and Announcement of

14

Third and Fourth Quarter Financial Guidance | National Nuclear...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Quarter Financial Guidance Third and Fourth Quarter Financial Guidance OFFM FY 2010 Financial Statements, Performance Accountability Reporting Guidance (PDF, 64KB)...

15

EIS-0426: Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6: Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued 6: Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of the Department of Energy / National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada National Security Site and Off-Site Locations in the State of Nevada EIS-0426: Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of the Department of Energy / National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada National Security Site and Off-Site Locations in the State of Nevada Summary This Site-Wide EIS evaluates the potential environmental impacts of proposed alternatives for continued management and operation of the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) (formerly known as the Nevada Test Site) and other U.S. Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE/NNSA)-managed sites in Nevada.

16

Columbia River System Operation Review : Final Environmental Impact Statement, Main Report Exhibits.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This Volume is a part of the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Columbia River System. This volume contains technical exhibits of cultural resources and commentary on the (System Operation Review) SOR process. The Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation comment is the majority of the material in the volume, in the Consultation Plan, Identification of trust resources; Criteria for the selection of a System Operating Strategy; comment on rights protection and implementation of Federal Trust responsibility; analysis of the draft EIS. Comment by other Native American Tribes and groups is also included: Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation; Kootenai Tribe of Idaho; Spokane Tribe of Indians; Coeur d` Alene tribe.

Columbia River System Operation Review (U.S.)

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

17

NEPA Contracting Reform Guidance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contracting Reform Guidance Contracting Reform Guidance NEPA Contracting Reform Guidance This documents provides guidance on NEPA contracting strategy, including: defining the work of the contractor; establishing contracts ahead of time; minimizing cost while maintaining quality. Guidance also provides: model statements of work, direction on NEPA contract management by NEPA Document Manager; a system for measuring NEPA costs and for evaluating contractor procedures; details on the DOE NEPA website. NEPA Contracting Reform Guidance More Documents & Publications NEPA Contracting Reform Guidance (December 1996) Statement of Work-National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Support Services Acquisition: Preparation and Review of Environmental Impact Statements, Environmental Assessments, Environmental Reports, and other Environmental

18

Public Meeting on Oversight of Complex, High Hazard Nuclear Operations - NNSA Statement - November 24, 2009  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Public Meeting on Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Public Meeting on Oversight of Complex, High Hazard Nuclear Operations Statement of Garrett Harencak, BRIG GEN, USAF Principal Assistant Deputy Administrator for Military Application Office of Defense Programs November 24, 2009 Good Morning, Mr. Vice-Chairman. I appreciate the opportunity to speak to the Board this morning regarding the Defense Programs approach to ensuring the safe management and operation of the nuclear security enterprise. Defense Programs Safety Approach and Safety Philosophy Consistent with the rest of the Department of Energy, the foundation of Defense Program's safety philosophy is Integrated Safety Management (ISM). Defense Programs and its Management and Operating Contractors continue to mature their implementation of ISM.

19

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Paducah, Kentucky, Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A DEPLETED URANIUM HEXAFLUORIDE CONVERSION FACILITY AT THE PADUCAH, KENTUCKY, SITE DECEMBER 2003 U.S. Department of Energy-Oak Ridge Operations Office of Environmental Management Cover Sheet Paducah DUF 6 DEIS: December 2003 iii COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) TITLE: Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Paducah, Kentucky, Site (DOE/EIS-0359) CONTACT: For further information on this environmental impact statement (EIS), contact: Gary S. Hartman DOE-ORO Cultural Resources Management Coordinator U.S. Department of Energy-Oak Ridge Operations P.O. Box 2001 Oak Ridge, TN 37831

20

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at Portsmouth, Ohio, Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A DEPLETED URANIUM HEXAFLUORIDE CONVERSION FACILITY AT THE PORTSMOUTH, OHIO, SITE DECEMBER 2003 U.S. Department of Energy-Oak Ridge Operations Office of Environmental Management Cover Sheet Portsmouth DUF 6 DEIS: December 2003 iii COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) TITLE: Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Portsmouth, Ohio, Site (DOE/EIS-0360) CONTACT: For further information on this environmental impact statement (EIS), contact: Gary S. Hartman DOE-ORO Cultural Resources Management Coordinator U.S. Department of Energy-Oak Ridge Operations P.O. Box 2001 Oak Ridge, TN 37831

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "guidance statement operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

DOE/EIS-0247; Draft Environmental Impact Statement Construction and Operation of the Spallation Neutron Source, December 1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 1998 December 1998 Construction and Operation of the S PALLATION N EUTRON S OURCE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science DOE/EIS-0247 Construction and Operation of the Spallation Neutron Source Facility Draft Environmental Impact Statement U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science December 1998 DOE/EIS-0247 Draft, December 1998 Cover Sheet COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) TITLE: Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), Construction and Operation of the Spallation Neutron Source (DOE/EIS-0247) LOCATIONS OF ALTERNATIVE SITES: Illinois, New Mexico, New York, and Tennessee. CONTACT: For further information on this document, write or call: Mr. David Wilfert, EIS Document Manager U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office

22

Public Meeting on Oversight of Complex, High Hazard Nuclear Operations - EM Statement - November 24, 2009  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Public Meeting on Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Public Meeting on Oversight of Complex High Hazard Nuclear Operations Statement of Dr. Ines Triay Assistant Secretary, DOE Office of Environmental Management November 24, 2009 Good morning Mr. Vice Chairman and Members of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. I appreciate the opportunity to be here today to represent the Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) and address the actions our office has taken regarding oversight of complex high hazard nuclear operations. My remarks cover the six topics you provided to the Secretary in your letter dated August 25, 2009. Expectations of the senior Department of Energy (DOE) leadership with respect to safety philosophy and safety management approach.

23

DOE/EIS0247; Final Environmental Impact Statement Construction and Operation of the Spallation Neutron Source  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SNS FEIS SNS FEIS Cover Sheet COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) TITLE: Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), Construction and Operation of the Spallation Neutron Source (DOE/EIS-0247) LOCATIONS OF ALTERNATIVE SITES: Illinois, New Mexico, New York, and Tennessee. CONTACT: For further information on this document, write or call: Mr. David Wilfert, EIS Document Manager Oak Ridge Operations Office U.S. Department of Energy 200 Administration Road, 146/FEDC Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Telephone: (800) 927-9964 Facsimile: (423) 576-4542 E-mail: NSNSEIS@ornl.gov Mr. Jeff Hoy, SNS Program Manager Office of Basic Energy Research U.S. Department of Energy (ER-10) Germantown, MD 20874 Telephone: (301) 903-4924 Facsimile: (301) 903-9513 E-mail: Jeff.Hoy@mailgw.er.doe.gov

24

Human Factors Guidance for Control Room and Digital Human-System Interface Design and Modification, Guidelines for Planning, Specification, Design, Licensing, Implementation, Training, Operation and Maintenance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Nuclear plant operators face a significant challenge designing and modifying control rooms. This report provides guidance on planning, designing, implementing and operating modernized control rooms and digital human-system interfaces.

R. Fink, D. Hill, J. O'Hara

2004-11-30T23:59:59.000Z

25

Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Summary Summary Prepared by: COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration TITLE: Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0348 and DOE/EIS-0236-S3) CONTACT: For further information on this EIS, For general information on the DOE Call: 1-877-388-4930, or contact National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, write or call: Thomas Grim Carol Borgstrom, Director Livermore Site Office Document Manager Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance NNSA (EH-42) 7000 East Avenue U.S. Department of Energy MS L-293 1000 Independence Avenue, SW

26

Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

III III Appendix E through P Prepared by: COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration TITLE: Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0348 and DOE/EIS-0236-S3) CONTACT: For further information on this EIS, For general information on the DOE Call: 1-877-388-4930, or contact National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, write or call: Thomas Grim Carol Borgstrom, Director Livermore Site Office Document Manager Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance NNSA (EH-42) 7000 East Avenue U.S. Department of Energy

27

Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

II II Appendix A through D Prepared by: COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration TITLE: Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0348 and DOE/EIS-0236-S3) CONTACT: For further information on this EIS, For general information on the DOE Call: 1-877-388-4930, or contact National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, write or call: Thomas Grim Carol Borgstrom, Director Livermore Site Office Document Manager Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance NNSA (EH-42) 7000 East Avenue U.S. Department of Energy

28

Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

I I Chapters 1 through 12 Prepared by: COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration TITLE: Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0348 and DOE/EIS-0236-S3) CONTACT: For further information on this EIS, For general information on the DOE Call: 1-877-388-4930, or contact National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, write or call: Thomas Grim Carol Borgstrom, Director Livermore Site Office Document Manager Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance NNSA (EH-42) 7000 East Avenue U.S. Department of Energy

29

Public Meeting on Oversight of Complex, High Hazard Nuclear Operations - HSS Statement draft, November 24, 2009  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

-20-09 -20-09 1 Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Public Meeting on Oversight of Complex, High Hazard Nuclear Operations Statement of Mr. Glenn Podonsky Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer U. S. Department of Energy November 24, 2009 INTRODUCTION Mr. Vice Chairman and Members of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB or "Board"), I am pleased to have this opportunity to discuss the Department's actions in response to the Board's Recommendation 2004-1 and other significant recommendations, initiatives, and management actions affecting nuclear safety in the Department. As the Department's Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer, I am here to update you on what we are doing and where we stand on pertinent issues, including our commitment to programs and processes aimed at the safe

30

Columbia River System Operation Review : Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix O: Economic and Social Impact.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This Appendix O of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Columbia River System measures the economic and social effects of the alternative system operation strategies and includes both geographic and methodology components. Areas discussed in detail include the following: purpose, scope and process; an economic history of the Columbia River Basin and its use today including the Columbia River and Socio-economic development in the Northwest and Major uses of the River System; Analysis procedures and methodologies including national economic evaluation, the concepts, analysis of assumptions, analysis for specific river uses, water quality, Regional evaluation, analysis, and social impacts; alternatives and impacts including implementation costs, andromous fish, resident fish and wildlife, flood control, irrigation and municipal and industrial water supply, navigation impacts, power, recreation, annual costs, regional economic analysis. Extensive comparison of alternatives is included.

Columbia River System Operation Review (U.S.)

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

31

Columbia River System Operation Review : Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix N: Wildlife.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Columbia River System is a vast and complex combination of Federal and non-Federal facilities used for many purposes including power production, irrigation, navigation, flood control, recreation, fish and wildlife habitat and municipal and industrial water supply. Each river use competes for the limited water resources in the Columbia River Basin. This technical appendix addresses only the effects of alternative system operating strategies for managing the Columbia River system. The environmental impact statement (EIS) itself and some of the other appendices present analyses of the alternative approaches to the other three decisions considered as part of the SOR. This document is the product of the Wildlife Work Group, focusing on wildlife impacts but not including fishes. Topics covered include the following: scope and process; existing and affected environment, including specific discussion of 18 projects in the Columbia river basin. Analysis, evaluation, and alternatives are presented for all projects. System wide impacts to wildlife are also included.

Columbia River System Operation Review (U.S.)

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

32

NEPA Contracting Reform Guidance (December 1996) | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1996) This guidance provides: model statements of work, information on contract types and incentives, direction on effective NEPA contract management by the NEPA Document...

33

Revision D to 2006 AOP Renewal Statement of Basis For Hanford Site Air Operating Permit No. 00-05-006  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The Statement of Basis (Statement) is issued by the permitting agencies as a separate supporting reference document to the Hanford Air Operating Permit (AOP). The Statement sets forth the legal and factual basis for the AOP conditions, and is not intended for enforcement purposes. The Statement includes references to the applicable statutory or regulatory provisions, technical supporting information on specific emission units, and clarifications of specific requirements. [Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-401-700(8)] In 1990, U.S. Congress amended the federal Clean Air Act (CAA). One change was to create air operating permits for industrial sources of air pollution (codified in Title 5 of the CAA). Prior to the creation of these permits, facility managers, regulators and the public had to look through many separate requirements to find those that applied to a certain facility. An air operating permit brings all applicable requirements into one place and requires the manager of the source to certify that it complies with all the applicable requirements. Further, the burden of proof for compliance changed from the regulating agencies to the sources. In 1991, the Washington State Legislature updated the Washington Clean Air Act [Chapter 70.94 of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW)] to make it consistent with the new federal program. In 1993, Ecology developed Washingtons operating permits regulation to comply with federal

unknown authors

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

34

Columbia River System Operation Review : Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix T (Second Continued Volume): Comments & Responses.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This is Appendix T (second continued volume) giving public comments and responses to the final environmental impact statement for the Columbia River System.

Columbia River System Operation Review (U.S.)

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

35

Columbia River System Operation Review : Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix R: Pacific Northwest Coordination agreement (PNCA).  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Currently, the Federal government coordinates the planning and operation of the Federal Columbia River Power System (FCRPS) with projects owned and operated by the region`s non-Federal hydrogenerating utilities pursuant to the Pacific North-west Coordination Agreement (PNCA). The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), the Corps of Engineers (Corps), and the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) are parties to the PNCA on behalf of the government of the United States. The PNCA is a complex agreement that provides an opportunity for the region`s power producers to maximize the power system`s reliability and economy while meeting their multiple-use objectives. The PNCA does not dictate the operation of the resources it coordinates. It is essentially an accounting mechanism that exchanges the power produced among the parties in order to improve the reliability of the system and reduce regional power costs. Project owners retain complete autonomy to operate as needed to meet their multiple-use requirements. The PNCA was executed in 1964 as an important component of regional plans to maximize the Northwest`s hydro resource capability. Maximization also included the development of storage projects on the Columbia River in Canada pursuant to the terms of the 1964 Columbia River Treaty. Because of the link between power coordination and Treaty issues, the current parties to the PNCA, currently are contemplating entering into a replacement or renewed power coordination agreement. Because the power coordination agreement is a consensual arrangement, its ultimate provisions must be acceptable to all of its signatories. This Appendix R to the Final Environmental Impact Statement of the Columbia River System is a presentation of the Pacific North-west Coordination Agreement.

Columbia River System Operation Review (U.S.)

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

36

Human Factors Guidance for Control Room and Digital Human-System Interface Design and Modification: Guidelines for Planning, Specifi cation, Design, Licensing, Implementation, Training, Operation, and Maintenance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Operators of nuclear power plants face a significant challenge designing and modifying control rooms that will be produced at various stages of instrumentation and control modernization. This report provides guidance on planning, specifying, designing, implementing, operating, maintaining, and training for modernized control rooms and digital human-system interfaces. Much of the guidance also will support new plant control rooms. This report also presents detailed information and guidelines on specific t...

2004-11-29T23:59:59.000Z

37

Final Environmental Impact Statement for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at Portsmouth, Ohio, Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2: Comment and Response Document 2: Comment and Response Document June 2004 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management Comment & Response Document Portsmouth DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS iii COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) TITLE: Final Environmental Impact Statement for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Portsmouth, Ohio, Site (DOE/EIS-0360) CONTACT: For further information on this environmental impact statement (EIS), contact: Gary S. Hartman DOE-ORO Cultural Resources Management Coordinator U.S. Department of Energy-Oak Ridge Operations P.O. Box 2001 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 e-mail: Ports_DUF6@anl.gov phone: 1-866-530-0944 fax: 1-866-530-0943 For general information on the DOE National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, contact:

38

Final Environmental Impact Statement for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Paducah, Kentucky, Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2: Comment and Response Document 2: Comment and Response Document June 2004 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management Comment & Response Document Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS iii COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) TITLE: Final Environmental Impact Statement for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Paducah, Kentucky, Site (DOE/EIS-0359) CONTACT: For further information on this environmental impact statement (EIS), contact: Gary S. Hartman DOE-ORO Cultural Resources Management Coordinator U.S. Department of Energy-Oak Ridge Operations P.O. Box 2001 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 e-mail: Pad_DUF6@anl.gov phone: 1-866-530-0944 fax: 1-866-530-0943 For general information on the DOE National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process,

39

Final Environmental Impact Statement for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Paducah, Kentucky, Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1: Main Text and Appendixes A-H 1: Main Text and Appendixes A-H June 2004 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management Cover Sheet Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS iii COVER SHEET * RESPONSIBLE FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) TITLE: Final Environmental Impact Statement for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Paducah, Kentucky, Site (DOE/EIS-0359) CONTACT: For further information on this environmental impact statement (EIS), contact: Gary S. Hartman DOE-ORO Cultural Resources Management Coordinator U.S. Department of Energy-Oak Ridge Operations P.O. Box 2001 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 e-mail: Pad_DUF6@anl.gov phone: 1-866-530-0944 fax: 1-866-530-0943 For general information on the DOE National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, contact:

40

Final Environmental Impact Statement for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at Portsmouth, Ohio, Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1: Main Text and Appendixes A-H 1: Main Text and Appendixes A-H June 2004 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management Cover Sheet Portsmouth DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS iii COVER SHEET * RESPONSIBLE FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) TITLE: Final Environmental Impact Statement for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Portsmouth, Ohio, Site (DOE/EIS-0360) CONTACT: For further information on this environmental impact statement (EIS), contact: Gary S. Hartman DOE-ORO Cultural Resources Management Coordinator U.S. Department of Energy-Oak Ridge Operations P.O. Box 2001 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 e-mail: Ports_DUF6@anl.gov phone: 1-866-530-0944 fax: 1-866-530-0943 For general information on the DOE National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, contact:

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "guidance statement operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Facility Representative Program: Program Mission Statement  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

General Program Information Program Mission Statement Program Directives and Guidance Facility Representative of the Year Award Program Facility Representative of the Year Award FR...

42

ICFA Statements  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Network ICFA Statement on Linear Colliders (August 1999) ICFA Statement on Large Hadron Collider 1996 ICFA Seminar Statement ICFA Statement on Communications in International...

43

Columbia River System Operation Review : Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix J: Recreation.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This Appendix J of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Columbia River System discusses impacts on the recreational activities in the region. Major sections include the following: scope and processes; recreation in the Columbia River Basin today - by type, location, participation, user characteristics, factors which affect usage, and managing agencies; recreation analysis procedures and methodology; and alternatives and their impacts.

Columbia River System Operation Review (U.S.)

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

44

Tropical Cyclone Formation Guidance Using Pregenesis Dvorak Climatology. Part I: Operational Forecasting and Predictive Potential  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

While there are a variety of modes for tropical cyclone (TC) development, there have been relatively few efforts to systematically catalog both nondeveloping and developing cases. This paper introduces an operationally derived climatology of ...

Joshua H. Cossuth; Richard D. Knabb; Daniel P. Brown; Robert E. Hart

2013-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

45

Public Meeting on Oversight of Complex, High Hazard Nuclear Operations - Chairman's Opening Statement - May 12, 2010  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

CHAIRMAN'S OPENING STATEMENT CHAIRMAN'S OPENING STATEMENT GOOD MORNING. MY NAME IS PETER WINOKUR AND I AM THE CHAIRMAN OF THE DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD. I WILL PRESIDE OVER THIS PUBLIC MEETING AND HEARING. I WOULD LIKE TO INTRODUCE THE MEMBERS OF THE SAFETY BOARD WHO ARE ALL PRESENT HERE TODAY. TO MY IMMEDIATE LEFT IS DR. JOHN MANSFIELD, AND TO HIS LEFT IS MR. JOSEPH BADER. ON MY RIGHT IS MR. LARRY BROWN, AND TO HIS RIGHT IS MS. JESSIE ROBERSON. WE FIVE CONSTITUTE THE BOARD. THE BOARD'S GENERAL COUNSEL, RICHARD AZZARO, IS SEATED TO MY FAR LEFT, AND NEXT TO HIM IS THE BOARD'S GENERAL MANAGER, BRIAN GROSNER. THE BOARD'S TECHNICAL DIRECTOR, TIMOTHY DWYER, IS SEATED TO MY FAR RIGHT. SEVERAL MEMBERS OF OUR STAFF CLOSELY INVOLVED WITH OVERSIGHT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S DEFENSE

46

Final AOP Renewal 2 Statement of Basis For Hanford Site Air Operating Permit No. 00-05-006  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

referred to as the permitting agencies, as a separate supporting reference document to the Hanford Air Operating Permit (AOP). The Statement sets forth the legal and factual basis for the AOP conditions, and is not intended for enforcement purposes. The Statement includes references to the applicable statutory or regulatory provisions, technical supporting information on specific emission units, and clarifications of specific requirements. [Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-401-700(8)] In 1990, U.S. Congress amended the federal Clean Air Act (CAA). One of those amendments created air operating permits for industrial sources of air pollution (codified in Title 5 of the CAA). Prior to the creation of these permits, facility managers, regulators and the public had to look through many separate requirements to find those that applied to a certain facility. An air operating permit brings all applicable requirements into one place and requires the manager of the source to certify that it complies with all the applicable requirements. Further, the burden of proof for compliance changed from the regulating agencies to the sources.

unknown authors

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

47

Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Summary-1992.html[6/24/2011 3:44:58 PM] Summary-1992.html[6/24/2011 3:44:58 PM] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the Regents of the University of California (UC) propose the continued operation, including near-term (within 5 to 10 years) proposed projects, of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). In addition, DOE proposes the continued operation, including near-term proposed projects, of Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore (SNL, Livermore). Continued operation plus proposed projects at the two Laboratories is needed so that the research and development missions established by Congress and the President can continue to be supported. As provided and encouraged by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), DOE and UC have prepared this document as a joint Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and

48

NEPA Contracting Reform Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

defining early what contractors should accomplish < establishing contracts ahead of time < minimizing cost while maintaining quality by * maximizing competition and use of incentives * using past performance information in awarding work * managing the NEPA process as a project This guidance provides: < model statements of work < information on contract types and incentives < direction on effective NEPA contract management by the NEPA Document Manager < a system for measuring NEPA process costs < NEPA contractor evaluation procedures < details on the DOE NEPA Web site U.S. Department of Energy, Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance, December 1996 NEPA CONTRACTING REFORM GUIDANCE Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

49

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Paducah, Kentucky, Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Paducah DUF 6 DEIS: December 2003 SUMMARY S.1 INTRODUCTION This document is a site-specific environmental impact statement (EIS) for construction and operation of a proposed depleted uranium hexafluoride (DUF 6 ) conversion facility at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Paducah site in northwestern Kentucky (Figure S-1). The proposed facility would convert the DUF 6 stored at Paducah to a more stable chemical form suitable for use or disposal. In a Notice of Intent (NOI) published in the Federal Register (FR) on September 18, 2001 (Federal Register, Volume 66, page 48123 [66 FR 48123]), DOE announced its intention to prepare a single EIS for a proposal to construct, operate, maintain, and decontaminate and decommission two DUF 6 conversion facilities at Portsmouth,

50

Supplement Analysis of Site-Specific and Programmatic Environmental Impact Statements: Operational and Engineering Modifications, Regulatory Review, and Socioeconomic Variation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DISCLAIMER DISCLAIMER This document has been approved for distribution to the public. All information classified by the Department of Energy Strategic Petroleum Reserve as Sensitive Unclassified Information has been removed from this document. DOE/SPR/EIS-0075-SA01 SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS OF SITE-SPECIFIC AND PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS: OPERATIONAL AND ENGINEERING MODIFICATIONS, REGULATORY REVIEW, AND SOCIOECONOMIC VARIATION U.S. Department of Energy Strategic Petroleum Reserve 900 Commerce Road East New Orleans, Louisiana 70123 March 2004 Prepared for the U. S. Department of Energy Strategic Petroleum Reserve Project Management Office under Contract No. DE-AC96-93PO92207 DynMcDermott Petroleum Operations Company 850 South Clearview Parkway

51

ARM - SGP Operations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Operations Operations SGP Related Links Facilities and Instruments Central Facility Boundary Facility Extended Facility Intermediate Facility Radiometric Calibration Facility Geographic Information ES&H Guidance Statement Operations Science Field Campaigns Visiting the Site Fact Sheet Images Information for Guest Scientists Contacts SGP Operations Routine Operations SGP central facility offices. SGP central facility offices. The overwhelming majority of the measurements with the highest priority, on which the existing experimental designs are based, are regular routine observations, as specified in the ARM Program Plan, 1990 (U.S. Department of Energy 1990). Scientifically and logistically, routine operations also serve as the basis and background for all nonroutine operations, including

52

Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Continued Operation of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico (05/2008)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 * Book 1 2 * Book 1 Appendices A through H Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico DOE/EIS-0380 May 2008 iii COVER SHEET Responsible Agency: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Title: Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico (SWEIS) (DOE/EIS-0380) Location: Los Alamos, New Mexico For additional information or for copies of the SWEIS, contact: Elizabeth Withers, EIS Document Manager NNSA Service Center - Albuquerque

53

Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Continued Operation of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico (05/2008)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Sections 1, 2, and 3 (pages 3-1 through 3-561) Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico DOE/EIS-0380 May 2008 Reader's Guide This Comment Response Document (CRD) for the Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico (LANL SWEIS or SWEIS) consists of four sections: * Chapter 1 - Overview of the Public Comment Process This section describes the public comment process for the Draft LANL SWEIS; the format

54

Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Continued Operation of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico (05/2008)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Section 3 (pages 3-562 through 3-1089) and Section 4 Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico DOE/EIS-0380 May 2008 Reader's Guide This Comment Response Document (CRD) for the Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico (LANL SWEIS or SWEIS) consists of four sections: * Chapter 1 - Overview of the Public Comment Process This section describes the public comment process for the Draft LANL SWEIS; the format

55

Final Environmental Impact Statement for the construction and operation of Claiborne Enrichment Center, Homer, Louisiana (Docket No. 70-3070)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This two-volume Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was prepared by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in accordance with regulation 10 CFR Part 51, which implements the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Volume 1 contains the assessment of the potential environmental impacts for licensing the construction and operation of a proposed gaseous centrifuge enrichment facility to be built in Claiborne Parish, Louisiana, by Louisiana Energy Services, LP. (LES). The proposed facility would have a production capacity of about 866 metric tons annually of up to 5 weight percent enriched UF{sub 6}, using a proven centrifuge technology. Included in the assessment are construction, both normal operations and potential accidents (internal and external events), and the eventual decontamination and decommissioning (D&D)- of the site. Issues addressed include the purpose and need for the facility, the alternatives to the proposed action, potential disposition of the tails, the site selection process, and environmental justice. The NRC staff concludes that the facility can be constructed and operated with small and acceptable impacts on the public and the environment. The FEIS supports issuance of a license to the applicant, Louisiana Energy Services, to authorize construction and operation of the proposed facility.

Zeitoun, A. [Science Applications International Corp., Germantown, MD (United States)

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

56

The Effects of Degraded Digital Instrumentation and Control Systems on Human-system Interfaces and Operator Performance: HFE Review Guidance and Technical Basis  

SciTech Connect

New and advanced reactors will use integrated digital instrumentation and control (I&C) systems to support operators in their monitoring and control functions. Even though digital systems are typically highly reliable, their potential for degradation or failure could significantly affect operator performance and, consequently, impact plant safety. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) supported this research project to investigate the effects of degraded I&C systems on human performance and plant operations. The objective was to develop human factors engineering (HFE) review guidance addressing the detection and management of degraded digital I&C conditions by plant operators. We reviewed pertinent standards and guidelines, empirical studies, and plant operating experience. In addition, we conducted an evaluation of the potential effects of selected failure modes of the digital feedwater system on human-system interfaces (HSIs) and operator performance. The results indicated that I&C degradations are prevalent in plants employing digital systems and the overall effects on plant behavior can be significant, such as causing a reactor trip or causing equipment to operate unexpectedly. I&C degradations can impact the HSIs used by operators to monitor and control the plant. For example, sensor degradations can make displays difficult to interpret and can sometimes mislead operators by making it appear that a process disturbance has occurred. We used the information obtained as the technical basis upon which to develop HFE review guidance. The guidance addresses the treatment of degraded I&C conditions as part of the design process and the HSI features and functions that support operators to monitor I&C performance and manage I&C degradations when they occur. In addition, we identified topics for future research.

O'Hara, J.M.; W. Gunther, G. Martinez-Guridi

2010-02-26T23:59:59.000Z

57

Columbia River System Operation Review : Final Environmental Impact Statement, Main Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The System Operation Review (SOR) Final EIS addresses four actions: (a) need to develop coordinated strategy for managing the multiple uses of the Federal Columbia River system (System Operating Strategy [SOS]); (b) need to provide interested parties other than management agencies with a long-term role in system planning (Forum); (c) need to renew or change current Canadian Entitlement Allocation Agreements (CEAA); and (d) need to renegotiate and renew the Pacific Northwest Coordination Agreement (PNCA). SOS alternatives analyzed are: (1) operation prior to Endangered Species Act listings of salmon stocks; (2) current operations (no action); (3) stable storage project operation; (4) natural river operation; (5) fixed drawdown; (6) operating strategies proposed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service, State fisheries agencies, Native American tribes, and Federal operating agencies; and (7) Preferred Alternative. The seven Forum alternatives analyzed are: (1) decisionmaking by the SOR lead agencies (preferred alternative); (2) decisionmaking by SOR lead agencies and recommendations by an existing regional entity; (3) decisionmaking by SOR lead agencies and recommendations by a new regional entity; (4) decisionmaking by a Federal consultation forum; (5) decisionmaking by a new entity; (6) decisionmaking by one Federal operating agency; (7) decisionmaking by a Federal agency other than an operating agency. PNCA alternatives analyzed are: (1) no replacement contract; (2) contract to maximize regional power benefits; (3) roll over existing PNCA; (4) current PNCA with modified operating procedures (preferred alternative); (5) current PNCA with nonpower modifications. CEAA alternatives include: (1) no action (no replacement of current allocation agreements); (2) entitlement allocation: 55 percent Federal; 45 percent non-Federal; (3) entitlement allocation: 70 percent Federal, 30 percent non-Federal (preferred alternative); (4) no agreement.

Columbia River System Operation Review (U.S.); United States. Bonneville Power Administration; United States. Army. Corps of Engineers. North Pacific Division; United States. Bureau of Reclamation. Pacific Northwest Region.

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

58

Technical Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Office of Technical Guidance, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security develops and issues Government-wide and Department-wide technical guidance to ensure that classified nuclear...

59

Acquisition Guidance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Guidance Acquisition Letters DOE Acquisition Regulations (DEAR) DOE Directives Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) Federal Register Financial Assistance Guide Headquarters Office...

60

O&M Metering Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

O&M and Metering Guidance O&M and Metering Guidance Ab Ream Ab.ream@ee.doe.gov Federal Utility Partnership Working Group October 2010, Rapid City SD 2 | FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM femp.energy.gov O&M and Metering Guidance FEMP Mission Statement "The Federal Energy Management Program facilitates the Federal government's implementation of sound, cost- effective energy management practices to enhance the nation's energy security and environmental stewardship" 3 | FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM femp.energy.gov O&M and Metering Guidance O&M Best Practice Guidance Release 3.0 - August 2010 General Updates Include:

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "guidance statement operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Columbia River System Operation Review : Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix D: Exhibits.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Columbia River and its tributaries are the primary water system in the Pacific Northwest, draining some 219,000 square miles in seven states and another 39,500 square miles in British Columbia. Beginning in the 1930`s, the Columbia River has been significantly modified by construction of 30 major dams on the river and its tributaries, along with dozens of non-Federal projects. Construction and subsequent operation of these water development projects have contributed to eight primary uses of the river system, including navigation, flood control, irrigation, electric power generation, fish migration, fish and wildlife habitat, recreation, and water supply and quality considerations. Increasing stress on the water development of the Columbia River and its tributaries has led primary Federal agencies to undertake intensive analysis and evaluation of the operation of these projects. These agencies are the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation, who operate the large Federal dams on the river, and the Bonneville Power Administration who sells the power generated at the dams. This review, termed the System Operation Review (SOR), has as its ultimate goal to define a strategy for future operation of the major Columbia River projects which effectively considers the needs of all river uses. This volume, Appendix D: Cultural resources appendix, Technical imput includes the following: Development of geomorphology based framework for cultural resources management, Dworshak Reservoir, Idaho; Impact profiles for SOR reservoirs; comments from the following Native American tribes: Burns Paiute Tribe; Coville Confederated Tribes; Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Indian Reservation; Confederated Tribes and bands of the Yakama Indian Nation (comments); Nez Perce Tribe; Coeur D`Alene Tribe; Spokane Tribe of Indians; The confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation.

Columbia River System Operation Review (U.S.)

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

62

STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS REQUEST BY THE UCHICAGO ARGONNE, LLC, AS OPERATOR OF  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

UCHICAGO ARGONNE, LLC, AS OPERATOR OF UCHICAGO ARGONNE, LLC, AS OPERATOR OF ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY FOR WAIVER OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN PATENT RIGHTS IN AN IDENTIFIED INVENTION, DOE DOCKET NO. S-122,001, MADE UNDER DOE CONTRACT NO. DE-AC02-06CH11357 AND IN COLLABORATION WITH AN INVENTOR FROM ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY; W(l)-2011-001, CH-1602. This waiver request is for domestic and foreign rights in a joint identified invention made by employees of Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) and Istanbul Technical University (ITU). The identified invention was made during an informal interchange between three ANL inventors and one inventor from ITU. In order to effectively commercialize the technology, ANL in association with the ITU inventor, Professor Servet Timur, hereby request the instant patent

63

STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS REQUEST BY THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AS OPERATOR OF  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AS OPERATOR OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AS OPERATOR OF LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY FOR WAIVER OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN PATENT RIGHTS IN AN IDENTIFIED INVENTION, DOE DOCKET NO. S-119,945 PARTIALLY MADE UNDER A SUBCONTRACT ISSUED UNDER DOE CONTRACT NO. DE-AC02-05CH11231 WITH THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, W(I)2010-002, CH1556 This waiver request by the University of California (the University) is for an identified jOint invention developed by a subcontractor of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) in performance of its work under its prime contract with the Departmenf of Energy. In October 2008, LBNL entered into a Work-For-Others Agreement (WFOA LB09005060) with ProGDerm, LLC entitled "Further Investigation of Rhamm Technology for Subcutaneous Fat Regeneration."

64

STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS REQUEST BY THE BATTELLE ENERGY ALLIANCE AS OPERATOR OF  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

BATTELLE ENERGY ALLIANCE AS OPERATOR OF BATTELLE ENERGY ALLIANCE AS OPERATOR OF IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY FOR WAIVER OF U.S. AND FOREIGN RIGHTS IN AN IDENTIFIED INVENTION, DOE DOCKET NO. S-109,900; U.S. PATENT NUMBER 7,946 ,342 MADE UNDER DOE CONTRACT NO . DE-AC07- 051D14517 WITH THE BATTELLE ENERGY ALLIANCE; W(l)-2012-002 , CH- 1646 This waiver was requested by the Battelle Energy Alliance (BEA), currently the manager and operator of Idaho National Laboratory (INL) under prime contract number DE-AC07- 051D14517 . The subject invention was conceived and reduced to practice solely by BEA employees under its M&O Contract with the DOE . The invention was not elected by BEA and a patent application was prosecuted by the DOE Patent Counsel resulting in U.S. patent no. 7,946,342 , issued on May 24, 2011. This petition is for a waiver of the U.S

65

Guidance & Opinions | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Guidance & Opinions Guidance & Opinions Guidance & Opinions Contractor Relations Guidance on Accessing Contractor and Subcontractor Employment Records Arbitration Guidance for Management and Operating Contractors Guidance on Meetings with Union Officials Political Activity at DOE Facilities and by DOE Contractors Opinion on Contractor Participation in the Federal Hiring Process Guidance on Inherently Governmental Functions Guidance on Electric Vehicle Recharging Stations Safety Regulations Interpretations INTERPRETATION REGARDING EXEMPTION RELIEF UNDER 10 C.F.R. PART 820, SUBPART E, EXEMPTION RELIEF, AND NON-COMPLIANT 'DOCUMENTED SAFETY ANALYSES' SUBJECT TO 10 C.F.R. PART 830, NUCLEAR SAFETY MANAGEMENT, SUBPART B, SAFETY BASIS REQUIREMENTS INTERPRETATION REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARD

66

Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

..viii ..viii List of Tables..............................................................................................................................................................viii Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Conversion Charts ...................................................................................................... xi S.1 Background ...................................................................................................................................................S-1 S.2 Purpose and Need for Agency Action..........................................................................................................S-4 S.3 Scope of the New Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement................................................................S-5

67

Enforcement Guidance Supplement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EGS:01-02 Appendix E- Operational Procedures for Enforcement Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 December 17, 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR: DOE PAAA COORDINATORS CONTRACTOR PAAA COORDINATORS FROM: R. KEITH CHRISTOPHER DIRECTOR OFFICE OF PRICE-ANDERSON ENFORCEMENT SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 01-02: Management and Independent Assessment Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedures for Enforcement, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity for the Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) to periodically issue clarifying guidance regarding the processes used in its enforcement activities. OE typically issues such guidance in the form of Enforcement Guidance Supplements (EGSs), which provide information or recommendations only and impose no requirements or actions on DOE contractors.

68

Columbia River System Operation Review : Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix D: Cultural Resources.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This study attempts to identify and analyze the impacts of the System Operating Strategy (SOS) alternatives on cultural resources. The impacts include effects on Native American traditional cultural values, properties and practices. They also include effects on archeological or historic properties meeting the criteria of the National Register of Historic Places. In addition to responding to the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), this analysis addresses the requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), the Archeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA), the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), the Native American Religious Freedom Act (NARFA), and other relevant legislation. To meet their legally mandated cultural resources requirements, the SOR agencies will develop agreements and Implementation Plans with the appropriate State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPOs), Tribes, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) detailing the measures necessary to best manage the resource. The planning and implementation activities will be staged over a number of years in consultation with affected Tribes.

Columbia River System Operation Review (U.S.)

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

69

Office of Technical Guidance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Guidance Director's Perspective Welcome to the Office of Technical Guidance Edith A. Chalk, Director Welcome to the Office of Technical Guidance. The Office of Technical Guidance...

70

Regulatory guidance document  

SciTech Connect

The Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) Program Management System Manual requires preparation of the OCRWM Regulatory Guidance Document (RGD) that addresses licensing, environmental compliance, and safety and health compliance. The document provides: regulatory compliance policy; guidance to OCRWM organizational elements to ensure a consistent approach when complying with regulatory requirements; strategies to achieve policy objectives; organizational responsibilities for regulatory compliance; guidance with regard to Program compliance oversight; and guidance on the contents of a project-level Regulatory Compliance Plan. The scope of the RGD includes site suitability evaluation, licensing, environmental compliance, and safety and health compliance, in accordance with the direction provided by Section 4.6.3 of the PMS Manual. Site suitability evaluation and regulatory compliance during site characterization are significant activities, particularly with regard to the YW MSA. OCRWM`s evaluation of whether the Yucca Mountain site is suitable for repository development must precede its submittal of a license application to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Accordingly, site suitability evaluation is discussed in Chapter 4, and the general statements of policy regarding site suitability evaluation are discussed in Section 2.1. Although much of the data and analyses may initially be similar, the licensing process is discussed separately in Chapter 5. Environmental compliance is discussed in Chapter 6. Safety and Health compliance is discussed in Chapter 7.

NONE

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

71

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Paducah, Kentucky, Site  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document is a site-specific environmental impact statement (EIS) for construction and operation of a proposed depleted uranium hexafluoride (DUF{sub 6}) conversion facility at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Paducah site in northwestern Kentucky (Figure S-1). The proposed facility would convert the DUF{sub 6} stored at Paducah to a more stable chemical form suitable for use or disposal. In a Notice of Intent (NOI) published in the ''Federal Register'' (FR) on September 18, 2001 (''Federal Register'', Volume 66, page 48123 [66 FR 48123]), DOE announced its intention to prepare a single EIS for a proposal to construct, operate, maintain, and decontaminate and decommission two DUF{sub 6} conversion facilities at Portsmouth, Ohio, and Paducah, Kentucky, in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (''United States Code'', Title 42, Section 4321 et seq. [42 USC 4321 et seq.]) and DOE's NEPA implementing procedures (''Code of Federal Regulations'', Title 10, Part 1021 [10 CFR Part 1021]). Subsequent to award of a contract to Uranium Disposition Services, LLC (hereafter referred to as UDS), Oak Ridge, Tennessee, on August 29, 2002, for design, construction, and operation of DUF{sub 6} conversion facilities at Portsmouth and Paducah, DOE reevaluated its approach to the NEPA process and decided to prepare separate site-specific EISs. This change was announced in a ''Federal Register'' Notice of Change in NEPA Compliance Approach published on April 28, 2003 (68 FR 22368); the Notice is included as Attachment B to Appendix C of this EIS. This EIS addresses the potential environmental impacts from the construction, operation, maintenance, and decontamination and decommissioning (D&D) of the proposed conversion facility at three alternative locations within the Paducah site; from the transportation of depleted uranium conversion products to a disposal facility; and from the transportation, sale, use, or disposal of the fluoride-containing conversion products (hydrogen fluoride [HF] or calcium fluoride [CaF{sub 2}]). Although not part of the proposed action, an option of shipping all cylinders (DUF{sub 6}, low-enriched UF{sub 6} [LEU-UF{sub 6}], and empty) stored at the East Tennessee Technology Park (ETTP) near Oak Ridge, Tennessee, to Paducah rather than to Portsmouth is also considered. In addition, this EIS evaluates a no action alternative, which assumes continued storage of DUF{sub 6} in cylinders at the Paducah site. A separate EIS (DOE/EIS-0360) evaluates the potential environmental impacts for the proposed Portsmouth conversion facility.

N /A

2003-11-28T23:59:59.000Z

72

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Portsmouth, Ohio, Site  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document is a site-specific environmental impact statement (EIS) for construction and operation of a proposed depleted uranium hexafluoride (DUF{sub 6}) conversion facility at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Portsmouth site in Ohio (Figure S-1). The proposed facility would convert the DUF{sub 6} stored at Portsmouth to a more stable chemical form suitable for use or disposal. The facility would also convert the DUF{sub 6} from the East Tennessee Technology Park (ETTP) site near Oak Ridge, Tennessee. In a Notice of Intent (NOI) published in the Federal Register on September 18, 2001 (Federal Register, Volume 66, page 48123 [66 FR 48123]), DOE announced its intention to prepare a single EIS for a proposal to construct, operate, maintain, and decontaminate and decommission two DUF{sub 6} conversion facilities at Portsmouth, Ohio, and Paducah, Kentucky, in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (United States Code, Title 42, Section 4321 et seq. [42 USC 4321 et seq.]) and DOE's NEPA implementing procedures (Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 1021 [10 CFR Part 1021]). Subsequent to award of a contract to Uranium Disposition Services, LLC (hereafter referred to as UDS), Oak Ridge, Tennessee, on August 29, 2002, for design, construction, and operation of DUF{sub 6} conversion facilities at Portsmouth and Paducah, DOE reevaluated its approach to the NEPA process and decided to prepare separate site-specific EISs. This change was announced in a Federal Register Notice of Change in NEPA Compliance Approach published on April 28, 2003 (68 FR 22368); the Notice is included as Attachment B to Appendix C of this EIS. This EIS addresses the potential environmental impacts from the construction, operation, maintenance, and decontamination and decommissioning (D&D) of the proposed conversion facility at three alternative locations within the Portsmouth site; from the transportation of all ETTP cylinders (DUF{sub 6}, low-enriched UF6 [LEU-UF{sub 6}], and empty) to Portsmouth; from the transportation of depleted uranium conversion products to a disposal facility; and from the transportation, sale, use, or disposal of the fluoride-containing conversion products (hydrogen fluoride [HF] or calcium fluoride [CaF{sub 2}]). An option of shipping the ETTP cylinders to Paducah is also considered. In addition, this EIS evaluates a no action alternative, which assumes continued storage of DUF{sub 6} in cylinders at the Portsmouth and ETTP sites. A separate EIS (DOE/EIS-0359) evaluates potential environmental impacts for the proposed Paducah conversion facility.

N /A

2003-11-28T23:59:59.000Z

73

Supplement Analysis for the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Continued Operation of the Pantex Plant and Associated Storage of Nuclear Weapon Components  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

D D E P A R T M E N T O F E N E R G Y U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS FOR THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE CONTINUED OPERATION OF THE PANTEX PLANT AND ASSOCIATED STORAGE OF NUCLEAR WEAPON COMPONENTS DOE/EIS-0225/SA-03 United States Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Pantex Site Operations P.O. Box 30030 Amarillo, Texas 79120-0030 February 2003 i Summary The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Procedures at 10 CFR 1021.330(d) require evaluation of its site-wide environmental impact statements (EISs) at least every 5 years by preparation of a supplement analysis (SA), as provided in 10 CFR 1021.314. Based on the SA, a determination is made as to whether the existing EIS remains

74

Report on Matters Identified at the Richland Operations Office During the Audit of the Department's Consolidated Fiscal Year 1996 Financial Statements, WR-FS-97-04  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

REPORT ON MATTERS IDENTIFIED AT THE RICHLAND OPERATIONS OFFICE DURING THE AUDIT OF THE DEPARTMENT S CONSOLIDATED FISCAL YEAR 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Office of Inspector General wants to make the distribution of its audit reports as customer friendly and cost effective as possible. Therefore, this report will be available electronically through the Internet five to seven days after publication at the following alternative addresses: Department of Energy Headquarters Gopher gopher.hr.doe.gov

75

Draft environmental impact statement for the siting, construction, and operation of New Production Reactor capacity. Volume 1, Summary  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) assesses the potential environmental impacts, both on a broad programmatic level and on a project-specific level, concerning a proposed action to provide new tritium production capacity to meet the nation`s nuclear defense requirements well into the 21st century. A capacity equivalent to that of about a 3,000-megawatt (thermal) heavy-water reactor was assumed as a reference basis for analysis in this EIS; this is the approximate capacity of the existing production reactors at DOE`s Savannah River Site near Aiken, South Carolina. The EIS programmatic alternatives address Departmental decisions to be made on whether to build new production facilities, whether to build one or more complexes, what size production capacity to provide, and when to provide this capacity. Project-specific impacts for siting, constructing, and operating new production reactor capacity are assessed for three alternative sites: the Hanford Site near Richland, Washington; the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory near Idaho Falls, Idaho; and the Savannah River Site. For each site, the impacts of three reactor technologies (and supporting facilities) are assessed: a heavy-water reactor, a light-water reactor, and a modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactor. Impacts of the no-action alternative also are assessed. The EIS evaluates impacts related to air quality; noise levels; surface water, groundwater, and wetlands; land use; recreation; visual environment; biotic resources; historical, archaeological, and cultural resources; socioeconomics; transportation; waste management; and human health and safety. The EIS describes in detail the potential radioactive releases from new production reactors and support facilities and assesses the potential doses to workers and the general public.

Not Available

1991-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

76

Drart environmental impact statement siting, construction, and operation of New Production Reactor capacity. Volume 4, Appendices D-R  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) assesses the potential environmental impacts, both on a broad programmatic level and on a project-specific level, concerning a proposed action to provide new tritium production capacity to meet the nation`s nuclear defense requirements well into the 21st century. A capacity equivalent to that of about a 3,000-megawatt (thermal) heavy-water reactor was assumed as a reference basis for analysis in this EIS; this is the approximate capacity of the existing production reactors at DOE`s Savannah River Site near Aiken, South Carolina. The EIS programmatic alternatives address Departmental decisions to be made on whether to build new production facilities, whether to build one or more complexes, what size production capacity to provide, and when to provide this capacity. Project-specific impacts for siting, constructing, and operating new production reactor capacity are assessed for three alternative sites: the Hanford Site near Richland, Washington; the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory near Idaho Falls, Idaho; and the Savannah River Site. For each site, the impacts of three reactor technologies (and supporting facilities) are assessed: a heavy-water reactor, a light-water reactor, and a modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactor. Impacts of the no-action alternative also are assessed. The EIS evaluates impacts related to air quality; noise levels; surface water, groundwater, and wetlands; land use; recreation; visual environment; biotic resources; historical, archaeological, and cultural resources; socioeconomics; transportation; waste management; and human health and safety. The EIS describes in detail the potential radioactive releases from new production reactors and support facilities and assesses the potential doses to workers and the general public. This volume contains 15 appendices.

Not Available

1991-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

77

Third and Fourth Quarter Financial Guidance | National Nuclear...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Financial Guidance Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Office of Financial Field Management > Third and Fourth Quarter Financial Guidance...

78

Report on Matters Identified at the Richland Operations Office During the Audit of the Department's Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as of September 30, 1995, WR-FS-96-01  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT ON MATTERS IDENTIFIED AT THE RICHLAND OPERATIONS OFFICE DURING THE AUDIT OF THE DEPARTMENTmS CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1995

79

ARRA Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

GUIDANCE FOR MODIFICATIONS GUIDANCE FOR MODIFICATIONS AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT (ARRA) This guidance is for contracting officers who are obligating ARRA funds on existing contracts. 1. All contracts obligating ARRA funds shall include the applicable contract language referenced in Flash 2009-28 if this language has not already been added to the subject instrument. The modification incorporating the ARRA unique terms and conditions must be added by a bilateral modification to the contract. 2. ARRA funding has unique tracking and reporting requirements. The Recovery Act funds must remain segregable from obligation through costing and disbursement. Recovery Act funds must be disbursed by September 30, 2015. Contracting Officers should so notify their impacted contractors.

80

Public Meeting on Oversight of Complex, High Hazard Nuclear Operations - Vice Chairman's Opening Statement - November 24, 2009  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

VICE CHAIRMAN'S OPENING STATEMENT VICE CHAIRMAN'S OPENING STATEMENT GOOD MORNING. MY NAME IS JOHN MANSFIELD AND I AM THE VICE CHAIRMAN OF THE DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD. I WILL PRESIDE OVER THIS PUBLIC MEETING AND HEARING. I WOULD LIKE TO INTRODUCE THE MEMBERS OF THE SAFETY BOARD WHO ARE PRESENT HERE TODAY. TO MY IMMEDIATE LEFT IS MR. JOSEPH BADER. AND TO HIS LEFT IS DR. PETER WINOKUR. ON MY RIGHT IS MR. LARRY BROWN. WE FOUR CONSTITUTE THE BOARD. THE BOARD'S GENERAL COUNSEL, RICHARD AZZARO, IS SEATED TO MY FAR LEFT, AND NEXT TO HIM IS THE BOARD'S GENERAL MANAGER, BRIAN GROSNER. THE BOARD'S TECHNICAL DIRECTOR, TIM DWYER, IS SEATED TO MY FAR RIGHT. SEVERAL MEMBERS OF OUR STAFF CLOSELY INVOLVED WITH OVERSIGHT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES ARE ALSO

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "guidance statement operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Columbia River System Operation Review : Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix F: Irrigation, Municipal and Industrial/Water Supply.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Since the 1930`s, the Columbia River has been harnessed for the benefit of the Northwest and the nation. Federal agencies have built 30 major dams on the river and its tributaries. Dozens of non-Federal projects have been developed as well. The dams provide flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydro-electric power generation, recreation, fish and wildlife, and streamflows for wildlife, anadromous fish, resident fish, and water quality. This is Appendix F of the Environmental Impact Statement for the Columbia River System, focusing on irrigation issues and concerns arrising from the Irrigation and Mitigation of impacts (M&I) working Group of the SOR process. Major subheadings include the following: Scope and process of irrigation/M&I studies; Irrigation/M&I in the Columbia Basin Today including overview, irrigated acreage and water rights, Irrigation and M&I issues basin-wide and at specific locations; and the analysis of impacts and alternative for the Environmental Impact Statement.

Columbia River System Operations Review (U.S.); United States. Bonneville Power Administration; United States. Army. Corps of Engineers. North Pacific Division; United States. Bureau of Reclamation. Pacific Northwest Region.

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

82

Columbia River System Operation Review : Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix C: Anadromous Fish and Juvenile Fish Transportation.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This Appendix C of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Columbia River System discusses impacts on andromous fish and juvenile fish transportation. The principal andromous fish in the Columbia basin include salmonid species (Chinook, coho, and sockeye salmon, and steelhead) and nonsalmoinid andromous species (sturgeon, lamprey, and shad). Major sections in this document include the following: background, scope and process; affected environment for salmon and steelhead, shaded, lamprey, sturgeon; study methods; description of alternatives: qualitative and quantitative findings.

Columbia River System Operation Review (U.S.)

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

83

EIS-0380: Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This Site-Wide EIS evaluates the continued operation of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). NNSA identified and assessed three alternatives for continued operation of LANL: (1) No Action, (2) Reduced Operations, and (3) Expanded Operations.

84

EIS-0323-S1: Draft Supplement Environmental Impact Statement...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

-S1: Draft Supplement Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0323-S1: Draft Supplement Environmental Impact Statement Sacramento Area Voltage Support Construction and operation has...

85

EIS-0369: Floodplain Statement of Finding | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

69: Floodplain Statement of Finding EIS-0369: Floodplain Statement of Finding Rail Alignment for the Construction and Operation of a Railroad in Nevada to a Geologic Repository at...

86

DOE/EIS-0075-SA-02: Operational and Engineering Modifications and Regulatory Review Supplemental Analysis of Site-Specific and Programmatic Environmental Impact Statements (September 2009)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SPR-EIS-0075-SA-02 SPR-EIS-0075-SA-02 SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS OF SITE-SPECIFIC AND PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS: OPERATIONAL AND ENGINEERING MODIFICATIONS, AND REGULATORY REVIEW U.S. Department of Energy Strategic Petroleum Reserve 900 Commerce Road East New Orleans, Louisiana 70123 September 2009 DOE/SPR/EIS-0075-SA02 Page 3 of 51 Prepared for the U. S. Department of Energy Strategic Petroleum Reserve Project Management Office under Contract No. DE-AC96-03PO92207 DynMcDermott Petroleum Operations Company 850 South Clearview Parkway New Orleans, Louisiana 70123 Page 4 of 51 DOE/SPR/EIS-0075-SA02 Table of Contents I. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 6

87

DOE/EIS-0380: 2008 Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory Mitigation Action Plan (December 2008)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Title: Title: 2008 Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory (DOE/EIS 0380) Mitigation Action Plan U.S. Department of Energy Date: December 2008 Los Alamos National Laboratory, an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer, is operated by the Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the National Nuclear Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC52-06NA25396. By acceptance of this article, the publisher recognizes that the U.S. Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free license to publish or reproduce the published form of this contribution, or to allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes. Los Alamos National Laboratory requests that the publisher identify this

88

Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 25, 2005 November 25, 2005 EIS-0372: Final Environmental Impact Statement Bangor Hydro-Electric Company (BHE) Northeast Reliability Interconnect September 1, 2005 EIS-0351: Final Environmental Impact Statement Operation of Flaming Gorge Dam August 26, 2005 EIS-0372: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Bangor Hydro-Electric Company (BHE) Northeast Reliability Interconnect August 5, 2005 EIS-0355: Final Environmental Impact Statement Remediation of the Moab Uranium Mill Tailings, Grand and San Juan Counties, Utah July 1, 2005 EIS-0353: Final Environmental Impact Statement South Fork Flathead Watershed Westslope Cutthroat Trout Conservation Program April 29, 2005 EIS-0348: Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and

89

CAR Demo 3.0: Community Activity Room Visualization of Probabilistic Reliability Contours for Operator Guidance, Version 3.0  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Community Activity Room (CAR) Version 3.0 software visualizes the probabilistic reliability index by means of color bands in the two-dimensional operating space of a power system. EPRI developed the concept of the CAR software in the spring of 2002. It was implemented in the CAR Painter software. A demonstration software (version 1.0) was issued in September 2002. Version 2.0 was issued in March 2004. The CAR Painter includes a 2D and a 3D visualization mode. CAR 3.0 can visualize the probabilistic r...

2004-12-08T23:59:59.000Z

90

Federal Energy Management Program: Greenhouse Gas Guidance and Reporting  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Greenhouse Gas Greenhouse Gas Guidance and Reporting to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Greenhouse Gas Guidance and Reporting on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Greenhouse Gas Guidance and Reporting on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Greenhouse Gas Guidance and Reporting on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Greenhouse Gas Guidance and Reporting on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Greenhouse Gas Guidance and Reporting on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Greenhouse Gas Guidance and Reporting on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Operations & Maintenance Greenhouse Gases Basics Federal Requirements Guidance & Reporting

91

SGIG Reporting Guidance Archive | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SGIG Reporting SGIG Reporting Guidance Archive SGIG Reporting Guidance Archive July 22, 2010-- Federal Register Notice on the DOE's invitation for public comment on request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to extend for three years the emergency Information Collection Request Title: OE Recovery Act Financial Assistance Grants, OMB Control No. 1910-5149 that DOE has submitted to OMB pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Comments due on or before August 21, 2010. More> Public comments on OE's Emergency Information Collection Request Support Statement and draft Smart Grid Grant Program reporting guidance. OE's response to public comments on its Emergency Information Collection Request Support Statement and draft Smart Grid Grant Program reporting

92

Supporting Statement:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Supporting Statement: Supporting Statement: OE Recovery Act Financial Assistance Grants OMB Control Number 1910-5149 This supporting statement provides additional information regarding the Department of Energy (DOE) request for processing of the renewal of the proposed information collection, OE Recovery Act Financial Assistance Grants. The numbered questions correspond to the order shown on the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Form 83-I, "Instructions for Completing OMB Form 83-I." 1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. The Department of Energy (DOE) requires collection of information for Recovery Act Smart Grid grants. Sections 1304 and 1306 of the Energy Independence and Security Act

93

EIS-0466: Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Ongoing Operations at Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This Site-Wide EIS evaluates the continued operation of the DOE/NNSA activities at Sandia National Laboratories. The SWEIS will consider a No Action Alternative, which is to continue current operations through implementation of the 1999 Record of Decision and subsequent NEPA decisions, and three action alternatives proposed for consideration.

94

Consolidated Financial Statements | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 20, 2000 March 20, 2000 Financial Statement: WR-FS-00-02 Report on Matters Identified at The Idaho Operations Office During The Audit of The Department of Energy's Consolidated Fiscal Year 1999 Financial Statements May 17, 1999 Financial Statement: WR-FS-09-04 Report on Matters Identified at the Oakland Operations Office during the Audit of The Department of Energy's Consolidated Fiscal year 1998 Financial Statements May 3, 1999 Finanacial Statement: WR-FS-09-03 Report on Matters Identified at the Richland Operations Office during the Audit of The Department of Energy's Consolidated Fiscal Year 1998 Financial Statements April 7, 1999 Finanacial Statement: WR-FS-99-02 Report on Matters Identified at the Albuquerque Operations Office During the Audit of the Department of Energy's Consolidated Fiscal Year 1998

95

DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index - Table of Contents |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index - Table of DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index - Table of Contents DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index - Table of Contents Return to Download Page The DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index includes: NEPA Guidance and Requirements Documents Issued by Published A Brief Guide - DOE-wide Contracts For NEPA Documentation DOE 2003 A Citizen's Guide to the NEPA - Having Your Voice Heard CEQ 2007 A Resource Handbook on DOE Transportation Risk Assessment DOE 2002 Actions During the NEPA Process - Interim Actions DOE 2003 Administrative Record Guidance DOJ 1991 Aligning the NEPA Process with EMS CEQ 2007 Alternative Actions For Analysis in Site-wide NEPA Reviews DOE 1992 Amended Environmental Impact Statement Filing System Guidance EPA 2012 Analysis of Impacts on Prime and Unique Agricultural Lands and NEPA

96

Enforcement Guidance Supplement (EGS) 00-04  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enforcement Guidance Supplement Enforcement Guidance Supplement EGS: 00-04 Appendix E- Operational Procedures for Enforcement Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 October 23, 2000 MEMORANDUM FOR: DOE PAAA COORDINATORS CONTRACTOR PAAA COORDINATORS FROM: R. KEITH CHRISTOPHER DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND INVESTIGATION SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-04: Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.23 and Compliance Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR Subpart C DOE' s Operational Procedures for Enforcement (June 1998), which supercede the DOE Enforcement Handbook (1087-95), provides the Office of Enforcement and Investigation with the opportunity to issue interim enforcement guidance from time to time with

97

Guidance | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Guidance Guidance Classification Atomic Energy Act of 1954 - Establishes Government-wide policies for classifying, safeguarding, and declassifying Restricted Data information. 10...

98

Notice of Guidance on Energy Efficiency Enforcement Regulations |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Notice of Guidance on Energy Efficiency Enforcement Regulations Notice of Guidance on Energy Efficiency Enforcement Regulations Notice of Guidance on Energy Efficiency Enforcement Regulations Notice - DOE Guidance on Energy Efficiency Enforcement Regulations, Federal Register Vol. 74, No. 197 October 14, 2009. This notice sets forth the Department of Energy's (DOE's) interpretation of its energy efficiency enforcement regulations. These regulations provide for manufacturer submission of compliance statements and certification reports to DOE, maintenance of compliance records by manufacturers, and the availability of enforcement actions for improper certification or upon a determination of noncompliance. DOE also announces its intent to randomly select and review manufacturer compliance with these requirements and initiate enforcement

99

Final Environmental Impact Statement for the construction and operation of Claiborne Enrichment Center, Homer, Louisiana (Docket No. 70-3-70). Volume 2, Public comments and NRC response  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) (Volume 1), was prepared by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in accordance with regulation 10 CFR Part 51, which implements the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), to assess the potential environmental impacts for licensing the construction and operation of a proposed gaseous centrifuge enrichment facility to be built in Claiborne Parish, Louisiana by Louisiana Energy Services, L.P. (LES). The proposed facility would have a production capacity of about 866 metric tons annually of up to 5 weight percent enriched UF{sub 6}, using a proven centrifuge technology. Included in the assessment are co on, both normal operations and potential accidents (internal and external events), and the eventual decontamination and decommissioning of the site. In order to help assure that releases from the operation of the facility and potential impacts on the public are as low as reasonably achievable, an environmental monitoring program was developed by LES to detect significant changes in the background levels of uranium around the site. Other issues addressed include the purpose and need for the facility, the alternatives to the proposed action, potential disposition of the tails, the site selection process, and environmental justice. The NRC staff concludes that the facility can be constructed and operated with small and acceptable impacts on the public and the environment, and proposes to issue a license to the applicant, Louisiana Energy Services, to authorize construction and operation of the proposed facility. The letters in this Appendix have been divided into three sections. Section One contains letters to which the NRC responded by addressing specific comments. Section Two contains the letters that concerned the communities of Forest Grove and Center Springs. Section Three is composed of letters that required no response. These letters were generally in support of the facility.

Zeitoun, A. [Science Applications International Corp., Germantown, MD (United States)

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

100

Alaska Power Administration Federal Power Program financial statements with supplementary information September 30, 1994 and September 30, 1993 with auditors` reports thereon  

SciTech Connect

The attached report presents the results of our audit of the Department of Energy`s Alaska Power Administration (APA) financial statements as of September 30, 1994. In our opinion, the APA statements are fairly presented in all material respects in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. our reports on the APA internal control structure and on its compliance with laws and regulations are also provided. The US Government, through the Department of Energy, operates APA at two sites to provide hydroelectric power to Juneau and Anchorage, Alaska. Additional information about APA is provided in the notes to the financial statements. The 1994 financial statement audit was made under provisions of the Inspector General Act (5 USC. App.), as amended, the Chief Financial Officers (CFO) Act (31 USC 1500) and the Office of Management and Budget implementing guidance to the CFO Act. The auditors` work was conducted in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards.

NONE

1995-02-13T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "guidance statement operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Severe Accident Management Guidance Technical Basis Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Guidance to aid operating crews in responding to a severe core damage accident was first developed as a response to the 1979 accident at Three Mile Island Unit 2. This guidance encompasses those actions that could be considered to arrest the progression of a core damage accident or to limit the extent of resulting releases of fission products. The original guidance was developed in a logical manner, starting with compiling the best information regarding severe-accident phenomena available at that ...

2012-10-31T23:59:59.000Z

102

STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS REQUES'f BY BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD OPERATIONS, INC. ('"BAKER HUGHES")  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

REQUES'f BY BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD OPERATIONS, INC. ('"BAKER HUGHES") REQUES'f BY BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD OPERATIONS, INC. ('"BAKER HUGHES") FOR AN ADVANCE WAIVER OF PATENT RfGHTS UNDER DOE AWARD NO. DE- EE0005505 ; W(A) 2012-013 Baker Hughes has requested a waiver of patent ri ghts of the United States of Americ a for all s ul~ject inventions arising from its participation tmder the above referenced award entitled ·'D irectional Measurement- Wh ile-Drilling System for Geothermal Applications." The purpose of the av,rard is to develop a reliable Directional Measurement-While·· Drill ing (MWD) System for the creation of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS). The sys tem to be developed under this award is a probe-based MWD tool for directional drilling that is alternator or battery povvcred, contains a navigation package capable of measuring inclinati

103

NEPA Contracting Reform Guidance (December 1996)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

defining early what contractors should accomplish defining early what contractors should accomplish < establishing contracts ahead of time < minimizing cost while maintaining quality by * maximizing competition and use of incentives * using past performance information in awarding work * managing the NEPA process as a project This guidance provides: < model statements of work < information on contract types and incentives < direction on effective NEPA contract management by the NEPA Document Manager < a system for measuring NEPA process costs < NEPA contractor evaluation procedures < details on the DOE NEPA Web site U.S. Department of Energy, Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance, December 1996 NEPA CONTRACTING REFORM GUIDANCE Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

104

Commissioning Guidance for ESPCs  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7.2 7.2 Commissioning Guide Commissioning Guidance for ESPCs INTRODUCTION Federal facility managers are challenged daily with maintaining existing federal building stock that is energy inefficient, requires increasing operations and maintenance (O&M) expenses, and often does not achieve the building occupant comfort needed to maintain worker productivity. Additionally, they are faced with congressionally mandated requirements to reduce energy use and O&M expenses, with little capital funding. The Super ESPC program provides a procurement mechanism to allow agencies to acquire performance-based services to implement energy efficient equipment and systems that reduce energy use and O&M expenses through projects designed, installed, financed, and

105

Federal Energy Management Program: Water Efficiency Goal Guidance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Goal Guidance to someone by E-mail Goal Guidance to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Water Efficiency Goal Guidance on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Water Efficiency Goal Guidance on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Water Efficiency Goal Guidance on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Water Efficiency Goal Guidance on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Water Efficiency Goal Guidance on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Water Efficiency Goal Guidance on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Operations & Maintenance Greenhouse Gases Water Efficiency Basics Federal Requirements Water Efficiency Goal Guidance Baseline & Annual Water Use Guidance Best Management Practices

106

Guidance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Guidance Guidance Guidance Cybersecurity These documents are currently under revision and awaiting management review and approval Cybersecurity Strategy - 2011 Cybersecurity Architecture - 2011 OMB Requirements Enterprise Architecture Enterprise Architecture Transition Plan - April 2011 Enterprise Architecture Guidance Records Management Centers of Excellence (pdf) Procedures and Instructions Records Management Handbook Design Criteria Standard for Electronic Records Management Software Applications NARA Bulletin 2011-02, Guidance on Managing Records in Web 2.0/Social Media Platforms NWM 27 2010, NARA Guidance for Developing Media Neutral Records Schedules and Notifications to NARA for Previously Scheduled Permanent Records NWM NARA Bulletin 2010-05, Guidance on Manageing Records in Cloud

107

Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1-1992/01eis0157_rg.html[6/24/2011 4:00:49 PM] 1-1992/01eis0157_rg.html[6/24/2011 4:00:49 PM] READER'S GUIDE The Final EIS/EIR is organized to assist the reader's understanding of the complex operations at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore. Organization of Documents The EIS/EIR is divided into five volumes and two companion reports: Volume I. This volume contains the Final EIS/EIR, which in part relies on the detailed information in the appendices, and comprehensively discusses the proposed action, the alternatives, and the existing conditions and impacts of the proposed action and the alternatives. Volume II. This volume contains the Final EIS/EIR technical appendices which provide technical support for the analyses in Volume I and also provide additional information and references. Appendix E was originally identified in

108

Consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 1996  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The following overview and accompanying audited financial statements have been prepared for Fiscal Year (FY) 1996 to report the financial position and the results of operations of the Department of Energy. These statements include the consolidated Statement of Financial Position and the consolidated Statement of Operations and Changes in Net Position. The statements have been prepared in accordance with the Office of Management and Budget Bulletin No. 94-01, Form and Content for Agency Financial Statements, and were developed in accordance with the hierarchy of accounting standards described therein. The overview provides a narrative on the Department of Energy`s mission, activities, and accomplishments. Utilizing performance measures as the primary vehicle for communicating Departmental accomplishments and results, this overview discusses the most significant measures while others are discussed in the supplemental information to the financial statements.

NONE

1997-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

109

State Agreement-In-Principle Program Guidance Memorandum | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Agreement-In-Principle Program Guidance Memorandum State Agreement-In-Principle Program Guidance Memorandum State Agreement-In-Principle Program Guidance Memorandum United States GovernmentDepartment of Energy Memorandum DATE: December 22, 1995 REPLY TO ATTN OF: EM-75 SUBJECT: State Agreement-in-Principle Program Guidance TO: Manager, Albuquerque Operations Office Manager, Chicago Operations Office Manager, Idaho Operations Office Manager, Nevada Operations Office Manager, Oak Ridge Operations Office Manager, Ohio Field Office Manager, Richland Operations Office Manager, Rocky Flats Field Office Manager, Oakland Operations Office Manager, Savannah River Operations Office The purpose of this memorandum is to provide you with guidance on the State Agreement-in-Principle (AIP) program. The guidance includes a collection of

110

STATEMENT OF  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

STATEMENT OF STATEMENT OF STEVEN H. HANCOCK, P.ENG. WELL ENGINEERING MANAGER RPS ENERGY CANADA COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES JULY 30, 2009 WASHINGTON D.C. THE PRODUCTION OF GAS HYDRATES Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee, thank-you for the opportunity to appear before you today to discuss the production and economics of gas hydrate development. INTRODUCTION Unconventional oil and gas resources such as heavy oil, coal bed methane, and shale gas, required development of new technologies such as horizontal and multi-lateral drilling before they could be economically produced. Based on our current understanding of gas hydrate properties and reservoir performance, we theoretically have the technology to drill, complete,

111

Managing Radiation Emergencies: Prehospital Guidance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Guidance for Prehospital Emergency Services Guidance for Hospital Medical Management Procedure Demonstration How do you manage emergencies? Guidance for Prehospital Emergency...

112

Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM (DOE/EIS-0388) (11/29/05)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

90 Federal Register 90 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 29, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY National Nuclear Security Administration Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM AGENCY: Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration. ACTION: Notice of intent. SUMMARY: The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), an agency within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), announces its intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate the operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility (BSL-3 Facility) at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in Los Alamos, New Mexico. This EIS is being prepared and considered in accordance

113

Draft environmental impact statement for the siting, construction, and operation of New Production Reactor capacity. Volume 3, Sections 7-12, Appendices A-C  

SciTech Connect

This Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) assesses the potential environmental impacts, both on a broad programmatic level and on a project-specific level, concerning a proposed action to provide new tritium production capacity to meet the nation`s nuclear defense requirements well into the 21st century. A capacity equivalent to that of about a 3,000-megawatt (thermal) heavy-water reactor was assumed as a reference basis for analysis in this EIS; this is the approximate capacity of the existing production reactors at DOE`s Savannah River Site near Aiken, South Carolina. The EIS programmatic alternatives address Departmental decisions to be made on whether to build new production facilities, whether to build one or more complexes, what size production capacity to provide, and when to provide this capacity. Project-specific impacts for siting, constructing, and operating new production reactor capacity are assessed for three alternative sites: the Hanford Site near Richland, Washington; the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory near Idaho Falls, Idaho; and the Savannah River Site. For each site, the impacts of three reactor technologies (and supporting facilities) are assessed: a heavy-water reactor, a light-water reactor, and a modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactor. Impacts of the no-action alternative also are assessed. The EIS evaluates impacts related to air quality; noise levels; surface water, groundwater, and wetlands; land use; recreation; visual environment; biotic resources; historical, archaeological, and cultural resources; socioeconomics; transportation; waste management; and human health and safety. The EIS describes in detail the potential radioactive releases from new production reactors and support facilities and assesses the potential doses to workers and the general public. This volume contains references; a list of preparers and recipients; acronyms, abbreviations, and units of measure; a glossary; an index and three appendices.

1991-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

114

Management Transition Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Records and Information Records and Information Management Transition Guidance November 2013 Records and Information Management Transition Guidance i Records and Information Management Transition Guidance Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.0 Introduction and Purpose ..................................................................................................... 1 LM Records Functions ................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 The Records Life Cycle ....................................................................................................... 2 3.0 Organizational Responsibilities ........................................................................................... 2

115

STATEMENT OF  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- 1 - - 1 - STATEMENT OF PATRICIA HOFFMAN ACTING ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGING THREATS, CYBER SECURITY AND SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES JULY 21, 2009 Thank you Chairwoman Clark and members of the Subcommittee for this opportunity to testify before you on electric sector vulnerabilities and cyber security issues. All of us here today share a common concern that vulnerabilities exist within the electric system and that the Department of Energy, in partnership with the rest of the Federal

116

National Environmenal Policy Act Contracting Reform Guidance: Phase 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The NEPA Contracting Quality Improvement Team identified several contracting improvements to reduce the cost and time for the NEPA process. The team`s February 1995 report recommended a series of steps to achieve the improvements, including issuance of contracting guidance. The guidance will be issued in three phases. This Phase I guidance implements the team`s short-term recommendations. It provides model statements of work and a sample schedule of contractor deliverables, establishes a pilot program for evaluating performance of NEPA support contractors, and describes information resources available on the DOE NEPA Web.

NONE

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

117

Statement of Considerations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statement of Considerations Statement of Considerations Class Waiver of the Government's Patent Rights in Inventions Made by Employees of Institutes of the New Independent States (NIS) of the Former Soviet Union (FSU) in the Course of or under Agreements Entered into Pursuant to the Fiscal Year 1994 Foreign Operations Appropriations Act (P.L. 103- 87); W(C) 94-010 The dissolution of the Soviet Union and the drastic reductions in defense spending by the NIS have created an extremely difficult situation for the scientists and engineers who are responsible for the former Soviet Union's defense technology base. It is estimated that there are several tens of thousands of such scientists and engineers; they possess critical technical knowledge about weapons of mass destruction and are underemployed

118

RH Packaging Program Guidance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this program guidance document is to provide the technical requirements for use, operation, inspection, and maintenance of the RH-TRU 72-B Waste Shipping Package (also known as the "RH-TRU 72-B cask") and directly related components. This document complies with the requirements as specified in the RH-TRU 72-B Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP), and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Certificate of Compliance (C of C) 9212. If there is a conflict between this document and the SARP and/or C of C, the C of C shall govern. The C of C states: "...each package must be prepared for shipment and operated in accordance with the procedures described in Chapter 7.0, Operating Procedures, of the application." It further states: "...each package must be tested and maintained in accordance with the procedures described in Chapter 8.0, Acceptance Tests and Maintenance Program of the Application." Chapter 9.0 of the SARP tasks the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Management and Operating (M&O) Contractor with assuring the packaging is used in accordance with the requirements of the C of C. Because the packaging is NRC-approved, users need to be familiar with Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 71.8, "Deliberate Misconduct." Any time a user suspects or has indications that the conditions of approval in the C of C were not met, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) shall be notified immediately. The CBFO will evaluate the issue and notify the NRC if required.In accordance with 10 CFR Part 71, "Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Material," certificate holders, packaging users, and contractors or subcontractors who use, design, fabricate, test, maintain, or modify the packaging shall post copies of (1) 10 CFR Part 21, "Reporting of Defects and Noncompliance," regulations, (2) Section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, and (3) NRC Form 3, Notice to Employees. These documents must be posted in a conspicuous location where the activities subject to these regulations are conducted. This document details the instructions to be followed to operate, maintain, and test the RH-TRU 72-B packaging. This Program Guidance standardizes instructions for all users. Users shall follow these instructions or equivalent approved instructions. Following these instructions assures that operations meet the requirements of the SARP.

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2008-01-12T23:59:59.000Z

119

RH Packaging Program Guidance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this program guidance document is to provide the technical requirements for use, operation, inspection, and maintenance of the RH-TRU 72-B Waste Shipping Package and directly related components. This document complies with the requirements as specified in the RH-TRU 72-B Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP), and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Certificate of Compliance (C of C) 9212. If there is a conflict between this document and the SARP and/or C of C, the C of C shall govern. The C of C states: "...each package must be prepared for shipment and operated in accordance with the procedures described in Chapter 7.0, Operating Procedures, of the application." It further states: "...each package must be tested and maintained in accordance with the procedures described in Chapter 8.0, Acceptance Tests and Maintenance Program of the Application." Chapter 9.0 of the SARP tasks the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Management and Operating (M&O) Contractor with assuring the packaging is used in accordance with the requirements of the C of C. Because the packaging is NRC-approved, users need to be familiar with 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 71.8, "Deliberate Misconduct." Any time a user suspects or has indications that the conditions of approval in the C of C were not met, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) shall be notified immediately. CBFO will evaluate the issue and notify the NRC if required. In accordance with 10 CFR Part 71, "Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Material," certificate holders, packaging users, and contractors or subcontractors who use, design, fabricate, test, maintain, or modify the packaging shall post copies of (1) 10 CFR Part 21, "Reporting of Defects and Noncompliance," regulations, (2) Section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, and (3) NRC Form 3, Notice to Employees. These documents must be posted in a conspicuous location where the activities subject to these regulations are conducted. This document details the instructions to be followed to operate, maintain, and test the RH-TRU 72-B packaging. This Program Guidance standardizes instructions for all users. Users shall follow these instructions or equivalent approved instructions. Following these instructions assures that operations meet the requirements of the SARP.

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2006-11-07T23:59:59.000Z

120

DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index - Table of Contents |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Table of Table of Contents DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index - Table of Contents Return to Download Page The DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index includes: NEPA Guidance and Requirements Documents Issued by Published A Brief Guide - DOE-wide Contracts For NEPA Documentation DOE 2003 A Citizen's Guide to the NEPA - Having Your Voice Heard CEQ 2007 A Resource Handbook on DOE Transportation Risk Assessment DOE 2002 Actions During the NEPA Process - Interim Actions DOE 2003 Administrative Record Guidance DOJ 1991 Aligning the NEPA Process with EMS CEQ 2007 Alternative Actions For Analysis in Site-wide NEPA Reviews DOE 1992 Amended Environmental Impact Statement Filing System Guidance EPA 2012 Analysis of Impacts on Prime and Unique Agricultural Lands and NEPA

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "guidance statement operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-02, Price-Anderson Amendment...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND INVESTIGATION SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-02: Price-Anderson Amendment Act (PAAA) Program Reviews Section 1.3 of the Operational...

122

Climate Vision: Presidential Statements  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Presidential Statements - Archive Statements by President George W. Bush: April 16, 2008 November 28, 2007 September 28, 2007 June 07, 2005 February 12, 2003 February 14, 2002 June...

123

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 01-01: Nuclear Weapon Program Enforcement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 01-01: Nuclear Weapon Program Enforcement Guidance Supplement 01-01: Nuclear Weapon Program Enforcement Issues Enforcement Guidance Supplement 01-01: Nuclear Weapon Program Enforcement Issues Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedures for Enforcement, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity for the Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) to periodically issue clarifying guidance regarding the processes used in its enforcement activities. This enforcement guidance focuses on the applicability of 10 CFR Part 830 to nuclear weapon programs and several related enforcement issues. Enforcement Guidance Supplement 01-01: Nuclear Weapon Program Enforcement Issues More Documents & Publications Enforcement Guidance Supplement 01-01: Nuclear Weapon Program Enforcement Issues Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-03: Specific Issues on Applicability of

124

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 01-01: Nuclear Weapon Program Enforcement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Guidance Supplement 01-01: Nuclear Weapon Program Guidance Supplement 01-01: Nuclear Weapon Program Enforcement Issues Enforcement Guidance Supplement 01-01: Nuclear Weapon Program Enforcement Issues Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedures for Enforcement, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity for the Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) to periodically issue clarifying guidance regarding the processes used in its enforcement activities. This enforcement guidance focuses on the applicability of 10 CFR Part 830 to nuclear weapon programs and several related enforcement issues. Enforcement Guidance Supplement 01-01: Nuclear Weapon Program Enforcement Issues More Documents & Publications Enforcement Guidance Supplement 01-01: Nuclear Weapon Program Enforcement Issues Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-03: Specific Issues on Applicability of

125

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 01-01: Nuclear Weapon Program Enforcement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Guidance Supplement 01-01: Nuclear Weapon Program Guidance Supplement 01-01: Nuclear Weapon Program Enforcement Issues Enforcement Guidance Supplement 01-01: Nuclear Weapon Program Enforcement Issues Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedures for Enforcement, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity for the Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) to periodically issue clarifying guidance regarding the processes used in its enforcement activities.This enforcement guidance focuses on the applicability of 10 CFR Part 830 to nuclear weapon programs and several related enforcement issues. Enforcement Guidance Supplement 01-01: Nuclear Weapon Program Enforcement Issues More Documents & Publications Enforcement Guidance Supplement 01-01: Nuclear Weapon Program Enforcement Issues Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-03: Specific Issues on Applicability of

126

Department of Energy`s Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund fiscal year 1997 financial statement audit  

SciTech Connect

This report presents the results of the independent certified public accountants` audit of the Department of Energy`s Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund (D&D Fund) financial statements as of September 30, 1997. The auditors have expressed an unqualified opinion on the 1997 statement of financial position and the related statements of operations and changes in net position and cash flows. The 1997 financial statement audit was made under provisions of the Inspector General Act (5 U.S.C. App.) as amended, the Government Management Reform Act (31 U.S.C. 3515), and Office of Management and Budget implementing guidance. The auditor`s work was conducted in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. To fulfill our audit responsibilities, we contracted with the independent public accounting firm of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP (KPMG) to conduct the audit for us, subject to our review. The auditors` report on the D&D Fund`s internal control structure disclosed no reportable conditions. The auditors` report on compliance with laws and regulations disclosed one instance of noncompliance. This instance of noncompliance relates to the shortfall in Government appropriations. Since this instance was addressed in a previous audit, no further recommendation is made at this time. During the course of the audit, KPMG also identified other matters that, although not material to the financial statements, nevertheless, warrant management`s attention. These items are fully discussed in a separate letter to management.

1998-08-21T23:59:59.000Z

127

Guidance on EIS Review and Recovery Act Loan Guarantee Applications |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Guidance on EIS Review and Recovery Act Loan Guarantee Applications Guidance on EIS Review and Recovery Act Loan Guarantee Applications Guidance on EIS Review and Recovery Act Loan Guarantee Applications June 8, 2010 - 2:22pm Addthis DOE must complete NEPA review before it may provide financial assistance in the form of loan guarantees. Projects seeking such assistance under Section 1705 of Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, 22 U.S.C. 16511-16514, must commence construction no later than September 30, 2011. Because many of DOE's Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) take 18-24 months to complete, the Department has previously notified applicants that DOE, "will be unlikely to complete the NEPA process" for a project requiring an EIS in sufficient time to make an award. This statement has led to questions whether there are any circumstances under which DOE may be

128

Alaska Power Administration combined financial statements, schedules and supplemental reports, September 30, 1995 and 1994  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report presents the results of the independent certified public accountant`s audit of the Department of Energy`s Alaska Power Administration`s (Alaska) financial statements as of September 30, 1995. The auditors have expressed an unqualified opinion on the 1995 statements. Their reports on Alaska`s internal control structure and on compliance with laws and regulations are also provided. The Alaska Power Administration operates and maintains two hydroelectric projects that include five generator units, three power tunnels and penstocks, and over 88 miles of transmission line. Additional information about Alaska Power Administration is provided in the notes to the financial statements. The 1995 financial statement audit was made under the provisions of the Inspector General Act (5 U.S.C. App.), as amended, the Chief Financial Officers (CFO) Act (31 U.S.C. 1500), and Office of Management and Budget implementing guidance to the CFO Act. The auditor`s work was conducted in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. To fulfill the audit responsibilities, the authors contracted with the independent public accounting firm of KPMG Peat Marwick (KPMG) to conduct the audit for us, subject to review. The auditor`s report on Alaska`s internal control structure disclosed no reportable conditions that could have a material effect on the financial statements. The auditor also considered the overview and performance measure data for completeness and material consistency with the basic financial statements, as noted in the internal control report. The auditor`s report on compliance with laws and regulations disclosed no instances of noncompliance by Alaska.

NONE

1995-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

129

Site Transition Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site Transition Guidance March 2010 Office of Environmental Management U.S. Department of Energy Washington D. C. 20585 Standard Review Plan (SRP) Technical Framework for EM...

130

Statement of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

in preparation for startup of operations of the Sodium Bearing Waste Facility. The Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project supports DOE's EM mission of safely storing and...

131

STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 FR 3 FR IPL DOE CH 630 252 277' 1U HL-Un-U r. .* * * STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS Class Waiver of the Government's U.S. and Foreign Patent Rights in Inventions Arising under Work for Others Activities Conducted with Advance Payments provided by the Laboratory using funds under Clauses H 21 (k)(3) and I 96(h) under Management and Operating Contract No, W-31-109-ENG-38 Between the Department of Energy and The University of Chicago, as Operator of Argonne National Laboratory, W(C)-99-003, CH-1009 The University of Chicago (University), a nonprofit educational organization, manages and operates the Government-owned facilities of the Department of Energy's (DOE) Argonne National Laboratory in Argonne, Illinois under Prime Contract W-31-109-ENG-38 (the Contract). The University

132

Statement of Work  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DE-SOL-0003174 1 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE, SEE FAR 3.104-3 PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS) Emergency Operations Training Academy (EOTA) Support Services May 27, 2011 Draft 1.0 Introduction The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), Office of Emergency Operations (NA-40) requires support services in the development and delivery of training, exercises, and other related technical and administrative support services at the Emergency Operations Training Academy (EOTA) in Albuquerque, New Mexico. 2.0 Background NA-40's mission is to ensure that capabilities are in place to respond to any NNSA and DOE facility emergency. NA-40 is the nation's premier responder to any nuclear or radiological

133

High Performance and Sustainable Buildings Guidance | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

High Performance and Sustainable Buildings Guidance High Performance and Sustainable Buildings Guidance High Performance and Sustainable Buildings Guidance More Documents &...

134

Information and Records Management Transition Guidance | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Information and Records Management Transition Guidance Information and Records Management Transition Guidance Information and Records Management Transition Guidance (March 2004)...

135

General Guidance on Data Usage and Management  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

General Guidance on Data Usage and Management General Guidance on Data Usage and Management Summary Data Usage Credit Data Management and Documentation: Introduction Our philosophy Data management Record measured values Zero versus missing value Metadata Data documentation Define variables Specify units Provide citations For additional information Summary Ensure long-term preservation of, and full and open access to, high-quality data sets Give proper credit to the researchers providing the data Provide thorough, yet simple, documentation: how the data were produced, what they mean Generate ASCII data and documentation files; they ensure readibility by virtually all users Define variable names and units Point to, or provide, important publications that further document the data Data usage CDIAC fully supports the July 1991 Policy Statements on Data Management for

136

Privacy Act Statement | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Statement | National Nuclear Security Administration Statement | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Privacy Act Statement Home > About Us > Our Operations > NNSA Office of General Counsel > Privacy Act (PA) of 1974 > Privacy Act Statement Privacy Act Statement Agency forms used to collect personal information protected by the Act must

137

Corporate information management guidance  

SciTech Connect

At the request of the Department of Energy`s (DOE) Information Management (IM) Council, IM representatives from nearly all Headquarters (HQ) organizations have been meeting over the past year as the Corporate Guidance Group (CGG) to develop useful and sound corporate information management (IM) guidance. The ability of the Department`s IM community to develop such unified guidance continues to be critical to the success of future Departmental IM planning processes and the establishment of a well-coordinated IM environment between Headquarters and field organizations. This report, with 26 specific corporate IM guidance items documented and unanimously agreed to, as well as 12 items recommended for further development and 3 items deferred for future consideration, represents a highly successful effort by the IM community. The effort has proven that the diverse DOE organizations can put aside individual preferences and work together towards a common and mutually beneficial goal. In examining most areas and issues associated with information management in the Department, they have developed specific, far-reaching, and useful guidance. The IM representatives recommend that the documented guidance items provided in this report and approved by the DOE IM Council be followed by all IM organizations. The representatives also strongly recommend that the guidance process developed by the CGG be the single process for developing corporate IM guidance.

NONE

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

138

Statement Before the Subcommittee on Children's Health and Environmental  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Children's Health and Children's Health and Environmental Responsibility, Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate (10/6/2011) Statement Before the Subcommittee on Children's Health and Environmental Responsibility, Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate (10/6/2011) Statement Before the Subcommittee on Children's Health and Environmental Responsibility, Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate By: David Geiser, Director, Office of Legacy Management, Department of Energy Subject: UMTRCA Statement before the Subcommittee on Children's Health and Environmental Responsibility, Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate More Documents & Publications UMTRCA Sites Fact Sheet Guidance for Developing and Implementing Long-Term Surveillance Plans for

139

EMSL: Proposal Guidance:  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Guidance for Fiscal Year 2014 Guidance for Fiscal Year 2014 Published December 2013 EMSL awards the majority of resources to proposals responding to the annual calls/cycles. To expedite the decision process, please contact the appropriate Capability Lead(s) based on your resource needs before beginning a proposal. Capabilities and contact information are detailed on EMSL's capability web pages. Additional Information User Portal 2014 Call for Proposals 2014 Proposal Guidance 2014 Proposal Review Criteria Guidance for Letters of Intent to JGI-EMSL Collaborative Science Call Guidance for Full Proposals to JGI-EMSL Collaborative Science Call (Invited Only) 2014 Proposal Planning 2014 Proposal Summary/Extension Previous Calls External Peer Reviewers Fellowships and Awards Nufo, logo An EMSL user proposal requires detailed information for a thorough peer and

140

Guidance for Planning Exercises  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Planning, Conducting and Evaluating for Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Transportation Emergency Preparedness Tabletops, Drills and Exercises Prepared for the Department of Energy Office of Transportation and Emergency Management 02B00215-10.p65 This page intentionally left blank table of contents Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program (TEPP) planning tools planning tools Guidance f Guidance f Guidance f Guidance f Guidance for Planning, Conducting and Ev or Planning, Conducting and Ev or Planning, Conducting and Ev or Planning, Conducting and Ev or Planning, Conducting and Evaluating aluating aluating aluating aluating T T T T Tr r r r ransportation Emer ansportation Emer ansportation Emer ansportation Emer ansportation Emergenc genc genc genc gency Pr y Pr y Pr y Pr y Prepar epar epar epar eparedness T

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "guidance statement operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

ARM - Social Media Guidance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

CenterSocial Media Guidance CenterSocial Media Guidance Media Contact Lynne Roeder lynne-dot-roeder-at-pnnl-dot-gov @armnewsteam Field Notes Blog Topics Field Notes89 AGU 3 AMIE 10 ARM Aerial Facility 2 ARM Mobile Facility 1 6 ARM Mobile Facility 2 47 BAECC 1 BBOP 4 MAGIC 12 MC3E 17 SGP 2 STORMVEX 29 TCAP 3 Search News Search Blog News Center All Categories What's this? Social Media Guidance News Center All Categories Features and Releases Facility News Field Notes Blog feed Events feed Employment Research Highlights Data Announcements Education News Archive What's this? Social Media Guidance Social Media Guidance Comments The ARM Climate Research Facility (ARM) welcomes comments on our website, blog, and our social media sites such as Facebook, Flickr, and YouTube. Comments are welcome at any time; however, responses to comments will

142

RH Packaging Program Guidance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this program guidance document is to provide technical requirements for use, operation, inspection, and maintenance of the RH-TRU 72-B Waste Shipping Package and directly related components. This document complies with the requirements as specified in the RH-TRU 72-B Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP), and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Certificate of Compliance (C of C) 9212. If there is a conflict between this document and the SARP and/or C of C, the SARP and/or C of C shall govern. The C of C states: ''...each package must be prepared for shipment and operated in accordance with the procedures described in Chapter 7.0, ''Operating Procedures,'' of the application.'' It further states: ''...each package must be tested and maintained in accordance with the procedures described in Chapter 8.0, ''Acceptance Tests and Maintenance Program of the Application.'' Chapter 9.0 of the SARP tasks the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Management and Operating (M&O) contractor with assuring the packaging is used in accordance with the requirements of the C of C. Because the packaging is NRC approved, users need to be familiar with 10 CFR {section} 71.11, ''Deliberate Misconduct.'' Any time a user suspects or has indications that the conditions of approval in the C of C were not met, the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) shall be notified immediately. CBFO will evaluate the issue and notify the NRC if required. This document details the instructions to be followed to operate, maintain, and test the RH-TRU 72-B packaging. This Program Guidance standardizes instructions for all users. Users shall follow these instructions. Following these instructions assures that operations are safe and meet the requirements of the SARP. This document is available on the Internet at: ttp://www.ws/library/t2omi/t2omi.htm. Users are responsible for ensuring they are using the current revision and change notices. Sites may prepare their own document using the word-for-word steps in th is document, in sequence, including Notes and cautions. Site specific information may be included as necessary. The document, and revisions, must then be submitted to CBFO at sitedocuments@wipp.ws for approval. A copy of the approval letter from CBFO shall be available for audit purposes. Users may develop site-specific procedures addressing preoperational activities, quality assurance (QA), hoisting and rigging, and radiation health physics to be used with the instructions contained in this document. Users may recommend changes to this document by submitting their recommendations (in writing) to the WIPP M&O Contractor RH Packaging Maintenance Engineer for evaluation. If approved, the change(s) will be incorporated into this document for use by ALL users. Before first use and every 12 months after, user sites will be audited to this document to ensure compliance. They will also be audited within one year from the effective date of revisions to this document.

Washington TRU Solutions, LLC

2003-08-25T23:59:59.000Z

143

Microsoft Word - Interpretive Guidance FINAL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 2, 2011 June 2, 2011 INTERPRETIVE GUIDANCE ON THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 C.F.R. § 205.322 This guidance is intended to clarify the Department of Energy (DOE)'s interpretation of 10 C.F.R. § 205.322, which sets forth the contents of an application for a Presidential permit issued by DOE under Executive Order (E.O.) 10485, as amended by E.O. 12038. Anyone seeking to construct, operate, maintain, or connect an electric transmission facility crossing the borders of the United States must first obtain a Presidential permit. Section 205.322 requires that an application for a Presidential permit provide, among other things: a) "Information regarding the applicant" (e.g., name, contact information, foreign government ownership or contractual relationships);

144

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 03-01, Supplemental Guidance Concerning the Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.23  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enforcement Guidance Supplement Enforcement Guidance Supplement EGS: 03-01 Appendix E-Operational Procedures for Enforcement Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 July 21, 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR: DOE PAAA COORDINATORS CONTRACTOR PAAA COORDINATORS

145

DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index - List of Contents |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

List of List of Contents DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index - List of Contents Return to Download Page The NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index includes: A Brief Guide - DOE-wide Contracts For NEPA Documentation [DOE][2003] A Citizen's Guide to the NEPA - Having Your Voice Heard [CEQ][2007] A Resource Handbook on DOE Transportation Risk Assessment [DOE][2002] Actions During the NEPA Process - Interim Actions [DOE][2003] Administrative Record Guidance [DOJ][1991] Aligning the NEPA Process with EMS [CEQ][2007] Alternative Actions For Analysis in Site-wide NEPA Reviews [DOE][1992] Amended Environmental Impact Statement Filing System Guidance [EPA][2012] Analysis of Impacts on Prime and Unique Agricultural Lands and NEPA [CEQ][1980] Analysis of Impacts to Workers in NEPA Documentation [DOE][1988]

146

Energy Department Issues Tribal Renewable Energy Purchase Guidance and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Department Issues Tribal Renewable Energy Purchase Guidance Energy Department Issues Tribal Renewable Energy Purchase Guidance and Project Development Resources Energy Department Issues Tribal Renewable Energy Purchase Guidance and Project Development Resources December 5, 2012 - 4:40pm Addthis News Media Contact (202) 586-4940 WASHINGTON - At the White House Tribal Nations Conference today, the Energy Department announced two new initiatives aimed at driving increased energy production and sustainable economic development in Indian Country. As part of the Energy Department's efforts to support Tribal renewable energy production, Energy Secretary Steven Chu issued a policy statement and guidance that gives preference to Indian tribes when its facilities contract to purchase renewable energy products or by products, based on

147

EIS-0256: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

256: Final Environmental Impact Statement 256: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0256: Final Environmental Impact Statement Sierra Pacific Power Company Alturas Transmission Line Project This Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/S) describes the environmental setting and consequences of the construction and operation of the proposal Alturas Transmission Line Project. Sierra Pacific Power Company (SPPCO) has proposed this electric power transmission line to improve the existing operational capacity and reliability of its power transmission system and provide for anticipated growth in demand for electric power. This volume contains the Executive Summary. Environmental Impact Statement for Sierra Pacific Power Company Alturas Transmission Line Project, DOE/EIS-0256 (November 1995)

148

CAP Program Guidance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CAP Program Guidance CAP Program Guidance CAP Program Guidance In 2002, the Department of Energy signed an interagency agreement with the Department of Defense's Computer/Electronic Accommodations Program (CAP) program to provide assistive/adaptive technology free of charge to DOE employees with disabilities. The following information regarding CAP is being provided to assist federal employees, managers and on- site disability coordinators with the CAP application process. CAP Program Guidance Responsible Contacts Suzanne Piper LEAD EMPLOYEE WORK LIFE SPECIALIST E-mail suzanne.piper@hq.doe.gov Phone 202-586-8515 More Documents & Publications DOE Reasonable Accommodation Procedures Desk Reference on DOE-Flex Operational Plan and Desktop Reference for the Disability Employment

149

CAP Program Guidance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CAP Program Guidance CAP Program Guidance CAP Program Guidance In 2002, the Department of Energy signed an interagency agreement with the Department of Defense's Computer/Electronic Accommodations Program (CAP) program to provide assistive/adaptive technology free of charge to DOE employees with disabilities. The following information regarding CAP is being provided to assist federal employees, managers and on- site disability coordinators with the CAP application process. CAP Program Guidance Responsible Contacts Suzanne Piper LEAD EMPLOYEE WORK LIFE SPECIALIST E-mail suzanne.piper@hq.doe.gov Phone 202-586-8515 More Documents & Publications DOE Reasonable Accommodation Procedures Rehabilitation Act of 1973 Operational Plan and Desktop Reference for the Disability Employment

150

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 01-22, Management and Independent Assessment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EGS: 01-02 Appendix E- Operational Procedures for Enforcement Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 December 17, 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR: DOE PAAA COORDINATORS CONTRACTOR PAAA COORDINATORS FROM: R. KEITH CHRISTOPHER DIRECTOR OFFICE OF PRICE-ANDERSON ENFORCEMENT SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 01-02: Management and Independent Assessment Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedures for Enforcement, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity for the Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) to periodically issue clarifying guidance regarding the processes used in its enforcement activities. OE typically issues such guidance in the form of Enforcement Guidance Supplements (EGSs), which provide information or recommendations only and impose no

151

EIS-0157: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EIS-0157: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0157: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0157: Final Environmental Impact Statement Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore The proposed action for the purposes of the EIS is the continued operation of LLNL and SNL, Livermore(2), including near-term (within 5 to 10 years) proposed projects. The proposed action, therefore, necessarily includes current operations plus programmatic enhancements and facility modifications pursuant to research and development missions established for the Laboratories by Congress and the President. DOE/EIS-0157, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report for Continued Operation of

152

Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement Nevada | National...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

> About Us > Our Operations > NNSA Office of General Counsel > National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) > NEPA Reading Room > Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement...

153

EIS-0294: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statement Sutter Power Project Western Area Power Administration operates and maintains a high-voltage electric transmission system in California to deliver power to qualified...

154

EIS-0281: Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement | Department...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement Sandia National LaboratoriesNew Mexico DOE proposes to continue operating the Sandia National LaboratoriesNew Mexico (SNL...

155

QA in Design Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Guidance Document for Integrating Quality Assurance During the Design and Construction Life Cycle September 2011 Page 2 of 29 FOREWORD This Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management (EM) guidance document is approved for use by all DOE EM organizational units and contractors performing work for EM. A project's Quality Assurance Program assigns responsibilities and authorities, defines policies and requirements, and provides for the performance and assessment of work that provides confidence that required level of quality is achieved, commensurate with the various project requirements. This guidance document offers for evaluation, by project personnel from EM and contractor

156

Environmental Policy Statement  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Environmental Policy Statement. ... Ensuring that energy and water are used responsibly and conserved through innovative practices and procedures ...

2010-12-02T23:59:59.000Z

157

Oral Presentation Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revised 04/01/2011 Page 1 of 2 Revised 04/01/2011 Page 1 of 2 09 ORAL PRESENTATION GUIDANCE The following guidance is not intended to replace or circumvent any existing agency-level guidance or regulation; the guidance is intended to enhance the agency's effectiveness when interviewing potential Energy Service Company (ESCOs). NOTE: Use for down selection of two or more ESCOs INSTRUCTIONS * Preplan your interview(s) * Be prepared o Decide whether to have video conference; webinar, telephonically or face-to-face interview (recommended). o Meet with the Acquisition Team (including your DOE Project Facilitator) at least one hour prior to the first ESCO interview. o Prepare questions and discussion issues based on the Team's comments and concerns. * Be brief o Recommend scheduling a 1 or 1-1/2 hour for each interview.

158

GENII Guidance Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

GENII Computer Code GENII Computer Code Application Guidance for Documented Safety Analysis Final Report U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environment, Safety, and Health 1000 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20585-2040 July 2004 GENII Guidance Report July 2004 Final Report INTENTIONALLY BLANK ii GENII Guidance Report July 2004 Final Report FOREWORD This document provides guidance to Department of Energy (DOE) facility analysts in the use of the GENII computer code for supporting Documented Safety Analysis applications. Information is provided herein that supplements information found in the GENII documentation provided by the code developer. GENII is one of six computer codes designated by the DOE Office of Environmental, Safety and Health as a toolbox code for safety analysis.

159

Oral Presentation Guidance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Revised 04/01/2011 Page 1 of 2 Revised 04/01/2011 Page 1 of 2 09 ORAL PRESENTATION GUIDANCE The following guidance is not intended to replace or circumvent any existing agency-level guidance or regulation; the guidance is intended to enhance the agency's effectiveness when interviewing potential Energy Service Company (ESCOs). NOTE: Use for down selection of two or more ESCOs INSTRUCTIONS * Preplan your interview(s) * Be prepared o Decide whether to have video conference; webinar, telephonically or face-to-face interview (recommended). o Meet with the Acquisition Team (including your DOE Project Facilitator) at least one hour prior to the first ESCO interview. o Prepare questions and discussion issues based on the Team's comments and concerns. * Be brief o Recommend scheduling a 1 or 1-1/2 hour for each interview.

160

MAAP4 Applications Guidance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The existing Modular Accident Analysis Program Version 4 (MAAP4) documentation consists of the MAAP4 User's Manual, the MAAP4 user's guides for input preparation, and transmittal documents that describe individual revisions. These components contain detailed information on the mechanics of running the code as well as detailed descriptions of the individual models, but they do not include specific applications guidance. This applications guidance document is intended to fill that gap by providing sufficie...

2010-07-30T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "guidance statement operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

EIS-0413: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Final Environmental Impact Statement Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0413: Final Environmental Impact Statement The Department of the Interior's Bureau of Land Management, with DOE's Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) as a cooperating agency, prepared this EIS to evaluate the environmental impacts of a proposal to construct and operate 156 wind turbine generators and related facilities on public lands surrounding the town of Searchlight, Nevada. The proposal includes a substation that would be operated by WAPA. EIS-0413: Final Environmental Impact Statement - Volume 1 EIS-0413: Final Environmental Impact Statement - Appendix A-1 - Public Scoping Report EIS-0413: Final Environmental Impact Statement - Appendix A-2 - NOA and Publications EIS-0413: Final Environmental Impact Statement - Appendix A-3 - Public

162

DOE-STD-1187-2005; Beryllium-Associated Worker Registry Data Collection and Management Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 May 2005 DOE TECHNICAL STANDARD Beryllium-Associated Worker Registry Data Collection and Management Guidance U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1187-2005 ii FOREWORD 1. Use of this standard is not mandatory. Users should review the document and determine if it meets their purpose. 2. Comments (recommendations, additions, and deletions) that may be of use in improving this document should be addressed to: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Health, c/o Paul Wambach, EH-53/270 Corporate Square Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20585-0270. 3. This standard was developed through a consensus process by staff operating the DOE

163

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 99-02  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EGS 99-02 EGS 99-02 Appendix E - Operational Procedures for Enforcement July 16, 1999 MEMORANDUM FOR DOE PAAA COORDINATORS CONTRACTOR PAAA COORDINATORS FROM: R. KEITH CHRISTOPHER DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND INVESTIGATION SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 99-02: DOE Enforcement Activities of Internal Dosimetry Program Requirements Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedure entitled Enforcement of DOE Nuclear Safety Requirements under Price-Anderson Amendments Act of 1988, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity for the Office of Enforcement and Investigation (EH Enforcement) to issue clarifying guidance in a timely manner with respect to the processes used in its enforcement activities. The focus of this enforcement guidance clarifies internal dosimetry program requirements identified by the Department of

164

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-03  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EGS:00-03 EGS:00-03 Appendix E- Operational Procedures for Enforcement Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 12, 2000 MEMORANDUM FOR DOE PAAA COORDINATORS CONTRACTOR PAAA COORDINATORS FROM: R. KEITH CHRISTOPHER DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND INVESTIGATION SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-03: Specific Issues on Applicability of 10 CFR 830 Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedure entitled Enforcement of DOE Nuclear Safety Requirements under Price-Anderson Amendments Act of 1988, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity for the Office of Enforcement and Investigation (EH- Enforcement) to issue clarifying guidance in a timely manner with respect to the processes used in enforcement activities. This enforcement guidance focuses on several issues related to applicability of 10 CFR 830 that have been observed in

165

Guidance Related to Analysis of Impacts to Workers in National Policy Act  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Guidance Related to Analysis of Impacts to Workers in National Guidance Related to Analysis of Impacts to Workers in National Policy Act (NEPA) Documentation Guidance Related to Analysis of Impacts to Workers in National Policy Act (NEPA) Documentation The purpose of this memorandum is to provide general guidance regarding the analysis of impacts to workers in DOE environmental impact statements (EISs) and environmental assessments (EAs) in order to assist DOE program and field offices in meeting the requirements of NEPA and to establish a general consistency in the Department's NEPA documentation. This guidance was prompted by several questions raised in this regard and was developed by the Office of NEPA Project Assistance, after consultation with the Office of General Counsel. Guidance Related to Analysis of Impacts to Workers in National Policy Act

166

Attachment G: Guidance on Headquarters Approval of State  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

G: Guidance on Headquarters Approval of State G: Guidance on Headquarters Approval of State Agreements-in-Principle Attachment G: Guidance on Headquarters Approval of State Agreements-in-Principle Guidance on Headquarters Approval of State Agreements-in-Principle Introduction: In December 1993, the Office of Environmental Management (EM) informed states that the Department intended to extend the existing Agreements-in-Principle (AIPs) for another five-year term and would continue to negotiate new AIPs. The purpose of this memorandum is to provide guidance on Headquarters approval of State AIPs in the EM program. This guidance applies to both new and renegotiated AIPs. All Operations and Field Offices are directed to involve appropriate Headquarters organizations early in the negotiations to assure that draft agreements

167

Extension of Comment Period on the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM (DOE/EIS-0380) (08/31/06)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10 Federal Register 10 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 169 / Thursday, August 31, 2006 / Notices Coordinator, at the address and phone number listed above. Issued at Washington, DC on August 24, 2006. Carol Matthews, Acting Advisory Committee Management Officer. [FR Doc. 06-7304 Filed 8-30-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450-01-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY National Nuclear Security Administration Extension of Comment Period on the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). ACTION: Notice of comment period extension. SUMMARY: On July 7, 2006, NNSA published a Notice of Availability for the Draft Site-wide Environmental

168

Army Guidance for UESCs  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of 11 of 11 Randy Smidt / DAIM-ODF-E / (703) 601-1564 (DSN 329) / SmidtRF@conus.army.mil 071400AUG2008 ARMY STRONG Army Policy Guidance for Utility Energy Services Contracts presented at The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group 5 MAY 2009 by Randy Smidt Headquarters Dept of Army, Office of the Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management 2 of 11 Randy Smidt / DAIM-ODF-E / (703) 601-1564 (DSN 329) / SmidtRF@conus.army.mil 071400AUG2008 ARMY STRONG Overview of Army UESC Program & Draft Policy Guidance * Army UESC Program * Draft Policy Guidance o Organizations, responsibilities & relationships o Procedures o Management & Execution o Resource Requirements o Reporting Requirements o Case Studies 3 of 11 Randy Smidt / DAIM-ODF-E / (703) 601-1564 (DSN 329) / SmidtRF@conus.army.mil

169

SECURITY TERMINATION STATEMENT | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

SECURITY TERMINATION STATEMENT SECURITY TERMINATION STATEMENT Form provides an individual's statement in connection with the termination of access authorization (security...

170

National Environmental Policy Act guidance: A model process  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The ``Model National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Process`` includes: References to regulations, guidance documents, and plans; training programs; procedures; and computer databases. Legislative Acts and reference documents from Congress, US Department of Energy, and Lockheed Idaho Technologies Company provide the bases for conducting NEPA at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL). Lockheed Idaho Technologies Company (LITCO) NEPA / Permitting Department, the Contractor Environmental Organization (CEO) is responsible for developing and maintaining LITCO NEPA and permitting policies, guidance, and procedures. The CEO develops procedures to conduct environmental evaluations based on NEPA, Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations, and DOE guidance. This procedure includes preparation or support of environmental checklists, categorical exclusion determinations, environmental assessment determinations, environmental assessments, and environmental impact statements. In addition, the CEO uses this information to train personnel conducting environmental evaluations at the INEL. Streamlining these procedures fosters efficient use of resources, quality documents, and better decisions on proposed actions.

Angle, B.M.; Lockhart, V.A.T.; Sema, B.; Tuott, L.C.; Irving, J.S.

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

171

QA in Design Guidance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

in Design Guidance QA in Design Guidance This Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management (EM) guidance document is approved for use by all DOE EM organizational units and...

172

Our Mission Statement  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Our Mission Statement The Environmental Management (EM) Program Mission in Oak Ridge is to complete cleanup safely with reduced risks to the public, workers, and the environment at...

173

2011 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and 1 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and Template 2011 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and Template The Department of Energy Federal Technical Capability Order, DOE 0 426.1, requires that managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards. Memo and Workforce Analysis Guidance for FR, SSO, STSM & TQP Template-2011.docx Description TEMPLATE More Documents & Publications 2012 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and

174

2012 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and Template 2012 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and Template The Department of Energy Federal Technical Capability Order, DOE O 426.1, requires that managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards. Memo and Workforce Analysis Guidance for FR, SSO, STSM & TQP Template-2012.docx Description TEMPLATE More Documents & Publications 2010 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and

175

2013 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and 3 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and Template 2013 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and Template The Department of Energy Federal Technical Capability Order, DOE 0 426.1, requires that managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards. Memo and Workforce Analysis Guidance for FR, SSO, STSM & TQP Template-2013.docx Description TEMPLATE More Documents & Publications 2012 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and

176

DOE Issues Guidance on Electric Vehicle Recharging Stations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Issues Guidance on Electric Vehicle Recharging Stations DOE Issues Guidance on Electric Vehicle Recharging Stations DOE Issues Guidance on Electric Vehicle Recharging Stations September 6, 2011 - 4:28pm Addthis The U.S. Department of Energy recently issued guidance to its national laboratory management and operating (M&O) contractors on the installation and operation of electric vehicle recharging stations at lab facilities. The guidance explains that lab contractors wishing to install electric vehicle recharging stations or make such stations available to employees and visitors have several options. Lab contractors may install such stations and seek reimbursement from the Department for their use to the extent such installation or use is reasonably required to meet fleet vehicle or demonstration project needs.

177

GC GUIDANCE ON MINOR CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLDS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

GUIDANCE GUIDANCE ON MINOR CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLDS We have been asked about how the Department implements what is known as the "minor construction threshold," which limits the amount of certain funds that can be spent on minor construction projects that are not specifically authorized by law. This Guidance is intended to clarify both the applicable law and Department policy. The Secretary's authority to carry out construction projects is subject to several limitations in the Atomic Energy Defense Act (AEDA) on the use of funds appropriated for DOE national security programs. One of these limitations, the "minor construction threshold," caps the amount of "operation and maintenance funds" or "facilities and "infrastructure funds authorized by a DOE

178

Record of Decision for the Fish and Wildlife Implementation Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0312) (10/31/03)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FISH AND WILDLIFE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FISH AND WILDLIFE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ADMINISTRATOR'S RECORD OF DECISION Summary The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has decided to adopt the Preferred Alternative (PA 2002) Policy Direction in its Fish and Wildlife Implementation Plan Environmental Impact Statement (FWIP EIS, DOE/EIS-0312, April 2003) as a comprehensive and consistent policy to guide the implementation and funding of the agency's fish and wildlife mitigation and recovery efforts. PA 2002 focuses on enhancing fish and wildlife habitat, modifying hydro operations and structures, and reforming hatcheries to both increase populations of listed fish stocks and provide long-term harvest opportunities. PA 2002 reflects regional fish and wildlife policy guidance and

179

POLICY STATEMENT ON TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has received two lettertype reports from its independent Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards. They provide comments on a draft final policy statement on technical specifications improvements for nuclear power plants and additional implementation information for the NRC's regulation on requirements for the renewal of operating licenses for power reactors. The ACRS also sent a letter report to the NRC's Executive Director for Operations that provides comments on the NRC staff's proposed rule on advanced light water reactor severe accident performance. Attachments:

unknown authors

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

180

Safety of magnetic fusion facilities: Guidance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document provides guidance for the implementation of the requirements identified in DOE-STD-6002-96, Safety of Magnetic Fusion Facilities: Requirements. This guidance is intended for the managers, designers, operators, and other personnel with safety responsibilities for facilities designated as magnetic fusion facilities. While the requirements in DOE-STD-6002-96 are generally applicable to a wide range of fusion facilities, this Standard, DOE-STD-6003-96, is concerned mainly with the implementation of those requirements in large facilities such as the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER). Using a risk-based prioritization, the concepts presented here may also be applied to other magnetic fusion facilities. This Standard is oriented toward regulation in the Department of Energy (DOE) environment as opposed to regulation by other regulatory agencies. As the need for guidance involving other types of fusion facilities or other regulatory environments emerges, additional guidance volumes should be prepared. The concepts, processes, and recommendations set forth here are for guidance only. They will contribute to safety at magnetic fusion facilities.

NONE

1996-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "guidance statement operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-03, Specific Issues on Applicabilit...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-03: Specific Issues on Applicability of 10 CFR 830 Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedure entitled Enforcement of DOE Nuclear Safety...

182

Audit of the US Department of Energy`s consolidated financial statements for Fiscal Year 1996  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Office of Inspector General audited the Department`s Consolidated Statement of Financial position as of September 30, 1996, and the related Statement of Operations and Changes in Net Position for the year ended. Results are described.

NONE

1997-02-24T23:59:59.000Z

183

ENERGY STAR Challenge for Industry: Statement of Energy Improvement |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Statement of Energy Statement of Energy Improvement Secondary menu About us Press room Contact Us Portfolio Manager Login Facility owners and managers Existing buildings Commercial new construction Industrial energy management Small business Service providers Service and product providers Verify applications for ENERGY STAR certification Design commercial buildings Energy efficiency program administrators Commercial and industrial program sponsors Associations State and local governments Federal agencies Tools and resources Training In This Section Campaigns Commercial building design Communications resources Energy management guidance Financial resources Portfolio Manager Products and purchasing Recognition Research and reports Service and product provider (SPP) resources Success stories Target Finder

184

Draft environmental impact statement for construction and operation of the proposed Bangor Hydro-Electric Company`s second 345-kV transmission tie line to New Brunswick  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) was prepared by the US Department of Energy (US DOE). The proposed action is the issuance of Presidential Permit PP-89 by DOE to Bangor Hydro-Electric Company to construct and operate a new international transmission line interconnection to New Brunswick, Canada that would consist of an 83.8 mile (US portion), 345-kilovolt (kV) alternating current transmission line from the US-Canadian border at Baileyville, Maine to an existing substation at Orrington, Maine. The principal environmental impacts of the construction and operation of the transmission line would be incremental in nature and would include the conversion of forested uplands (mostly commercial timberlands) and wetlands to right-of-way (small trees, shrubs, and herbaceous vegetation). The proposed line would also result in localized minor to moderate visual impacts and would contribute a minor incremental increase in the exposure of some individuals to electromagnetic fields. This DEIS documents the purpose and need for the proposed action, describes the proposed action and alternatives considered and provides a comparison of the proposed and alternatives routes, and provides detailed information on analyses of the environmental consequences of the proposed action and alternatives, as well as mitigative measures to minimize impacts.

NONE

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

185

Guidance on Inherently Governmental Functions | Department of...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Inherently Governmental Functions Guidance on Inherently Governmental Functions Federal law prohibits contractors from performing "inherently governmental functions." This guidance...

186

EPAct 2005 Metering Guidance Overview  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EPAct 2005 Metering Guidance EPAct 2005 Metering Guidance Overview Dave Hunt Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Section 103 Requirements * What to meter - Building electric usage - All buildings * How to meter - Standard meters - Advanced meters * When - by 10/1/2012 FEMP's Response * Metering guidance document * Agency planning workshops * Metering training course * Metering Best Practices Guide (FY 2007) Important Dates * August 3, 2006 - agency plans due * As determined by individual agencies - site metering plans * October 1, 2012 - compliance deadline Issues * Funding * Practicability * EPAct time-based rate schedule * Agency policies/guidance Potential Roles for Utilities * Guidance/updates on time-based pricing * Metering services * Finance installations * Other? Useful Documents

187

GUIDANCE REGARDING NEPA REGULATIONS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

This memorandum was published in the Federal Register and appears at 48 Fed. Reg. 34263 (1983). Ed. Note] This memorandum was published in the Federal Register and appears at 48 Fed. Reg. 34263 (1983). Ed. Note] GUIDANCE REGARDING NEPA REGULATIONS 40 CFR Part 1500 Executive Office of the President Council on Environmental Quality 722 Jackson Place, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 July 22, 1983 Memorandum For: Heads of Federal Agencies From: A. Alan Hill, Chairman Re: Guidance Regarding NEPA Regulations The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) were issued on November 29, 1978. These regulations became effective for, and binding upon, most federal agencies on July 30, 1979, and for all remaining federal agencies on November 30, 1979. As part of the Council's NEPA oversight responsibilities it solicited through an August 14,

188

Sediments Guidance Compendium  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Management of contaminated sediments poses a complicated, expensive problem, exacerbated by the fact that contamination is often the cumulative result of inputs from numerous sources over many years. Contaminated sediments are of particular concern among owners of former manufactured gas plant sites. This "Sediment Guidance Compendium" is designed to help site owners faced with remedial challenges determine how to manage contaminated sediments. The compendium discusses the rationale behind risk assessmen...

2001-10-30T23:59:59.000Z

189

Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Continued Operation of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico (05/2008)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

I I MAJOR MATERIAL DISPOSAL AREA REMEDIATION, CANYON CLEANUPS, AND OTHER CONSENT ORDER ACTIONS I-1 Implementing the Consent Order NNSA intends to implement actions necessary to comply with the Compliance Order on Consent (Consent Order) regardless of decisions it makes on other actions analyzed in the LANL SWEIS. Actions associated with implementing the Consent Order are included in the Expanded Operations Alternative; however, their implementation is not contingent on other actions that are part of that alternative. APPENDIX I MAJOR MATERIAL DISPOSAL AREA REMEDIATION, CANYON CLEANUPS, AND OTHER CONSENT ORDER ACTIONS Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) conducts operations in support of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), a semi-autonomous administration within the U.S. Department

190

GC GUIDANCE ON BARTER TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING DOE-OWNED URANIUM | Department  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

GC GUIDANCE ON BARTER TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING DOE-OWNED URANIUM GC GUIDANCE ON BARTER TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING DOE-OWNED URANIUM GC GUIDANCE ON BARTER TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING DOE-OWNED URANIUM The Department of Energy has on a variety of occasions engaged in transactions under which it bartered uranium to which it has title for goods or services . This guidance memorializes the results of analyses previously directed to individual proposed transactions . For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that the Atomic Energy Act of 1954' , as amended, (AEA), authorizes such barter transactions. GC GUIDANCE ON BARTER TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING DOE-OWNED URANIUM More Documents & Publications Leasing of Department of Energy Property Before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Energy EIS-0468: Final Environmental Impact Statement

191

International Conference on Machine Control & Guidance 2008 1 Automatic Guidance of Track Laying Machines with  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

laying machines, coordinate systems, error detection, work process driven data management, quality. Its outstanding result, the track management system Toporail, was developed under the operational lead on Machine Control & Guidance 2008 5 Figure 5: Maintenance process driven data management: Data updates

192

EIS-0411: Notice of Cancellation of the Environmental Impact Statement |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cancellation of the Environmental Impact Cancellation of the Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0411: Notice of Cancellation of the Environmental Impact Statement Transmission Agency of Northern California Transmission Project Western Area Power Administration (Western), an agency of the Department of Energy (DOE), is canceling preparation of the Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR) for construction, operation, and maintenance of the proposed Transmission Agency of Northern California (TANC) Transmission Project. Western Area Power Administration Notice of Cancellation of the Transmission Agency of Northern California Transmission Project, Environmental Impact Statement More Documents & Publications EIS-0183: Notice of Extension of Scoping Period EIS-0377: DOE Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact

193

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 03-01 Supplemental Guidance Concerning the  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Supplement 03-01 Supplemental Guidance Supplement 03-01 Supplemental Guidance Concerning the Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.23 Enforcement Guidance Supplement 03-01 Supplemental Guidance Concerning the Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.23 In October 2000, the Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) issued Enforcement Guidance Supplement (EGS) 00-04, "Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.23 and Compliance Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR subpart C." That EGS, in part, delineated a set of criteria that OE would use to determine whether to apply its enforcement discretion, in this case through the use of Consent Orders. Those criteria provided both guidance to DOE contractors regarding situations for which the use of

194

Final Environmental Impact Statement (Supplement to ERDA-1537, September 1977) Waste Management Operations Double-Shell Tanks for Defense High-Level Radioactive Waste Storage Savannah River Plant  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Do Do E/EIS-0062 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT mATEIUIENT (Supplement to ERDA-1537, September 1977) Waste ~ Management Operations Savannah River Plant ! Aiken, South Carolina Double-Shell Tanks for Defense High-Level Radioactive Waste Storage April 1980 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON. D.C.20545 1980 WL 94273 (F.R.) NOTICES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Deputy Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Waste Management Double-Shell Tanks for Defense High-Level Radioactive Waste Storage, Savannah River Plant, Aiken, S.C. Wednesday, July 9, 1980 *46154 Record of Decision Decision. The decision has been made to complete the construction of the 14 double-shell tanks and use them to store defense high-level radioactive waste at the Savannah River Plant (SRP). Background. The SRP, located near Aiken, South Carolina, is a major installation of the

195

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Transfer of the Heat Source / Radioisotope Themoelectric Generator Assembly and Test Operations From the Mound Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

031 031 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 1998 / Notices SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The package listing contains the following information: (1) Title of the information collection package; (2) current OMB control number; (3) type of respondents; (4) estimated number of responses annually; (5) estimated total burden hours, annually, including recordkeeping hours required to provide the information; (6) purpose; and (7) number of collections. Package Title: Legal. Current OMB No.: 1910-0800. Type of Respondents: DOE management and operating contractors, and offsite contractors. Estimated Number of Responses: 2,719. Estimated Total Burden Hours: 21,052. Purpose: This information is required by the Department to ensure that legal resources and requirements are

196

STATEMENT OF CONSIDERA l"IONS REQUEST BY INEOS USA LLC, OPERATING AS INEOS TECHNOLOGIES, (lNEOS) FOR AN  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CONSIDERA l"IONS CONSIDERA l"IONS REQUEST BY INEOS USA LLC, OPERATING AS INEOS TECHNOLOGIES, (lNEOS) FOR AN ADVANCE WAIVER OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN PATENT RIGHTS UNDER A PROPOSED SUB-AWARD OF GRANT NO. DE-FG36-04G014315 BETWEEN BIOENGINEERING RESOURCES, INC. (BRI) AND DOE; W(A)2008-028 The Petitioner, INEOS. has requested a waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights for all subject inventions arising from its participation under the above referenced award entitled "Thermochemical Conversion of Com Stover." Petitioner is in the process of acquiring Bioengineering Resources, Inc. (BRI), the original small business grantee. In anticipation of its pending acquisition, Petitioner has proposed to become a sub-awardee under BRI by means of a sub-award agreement (sub-award).

197

Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Closeout Guidance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Program Guidance Program Guidance Site Map Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Closeout Guidance to someone by E-mail Share Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Closeout Guidance on Facebook Tweet about Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Closeout Guidance on Twitter Bookmark Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Closeout Guidance on Google Bookmark Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Closeout Guidance on Delicious Rank Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Closeout Guidance on Digg Find More places to share Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Closeout Guidance on AddThis.com... Closeout Guidance Recovery Act Monitoring & Reporting National Environmental Policy Act

198

Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Guidance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Energy Management Energy Management Guidance to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Guidance on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Guidance on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Guidance on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Guidance on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Guidance on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Guidance on AddThis.com... Requirements by Subject Requirements by Regulation Notices & Rules Guidance Facility Reporting Fleet Reporting Energy Management Guidance The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) provides guidance on Federal

199

Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Program Guidance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Program Guidance Program Guidance Site Map Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Program Guidance to someone by E-mail Share Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Program Guidance on Facebook Tweet about Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Program Guidance on Twitter Bookmark Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Program Guidance on Google Bookmark Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Program Guidance on Delicious Rank Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Program Guidance on Digg Find More places to share Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Program Guidance on AddThis.com... Closeout Guidance Recovery Act Monitoring & Reporting National Environmental Policy Act

200

EIS-0280: Notice of Cancellation of Environmental Impact Statement |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cancellation of Environmental Impact Statement Cancellation of Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0280: Notice of Cancellation of Environmental Impact Statement Clean Power From Integrated Coal/ Ore Reduction Project, Provo, Utah The Department of Energy (DOE) is canceling the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a proposal by Geneva Steel Company to design, construct, and operate a project known as the Clean Power from Integrated Coal/Ore Reduction (CPICOR) Project near Provo, Utah. DOE/EIS-0280, Department of Energy, Notice of Cancellation of Environmental Impact Statement process for the Clean Power From Integrated Coal/ Ore Reduction (CPICOR) Project, Provo, Utah (October 2004) More Documents & Publications EIS-0282: Notice of Cancellation of the Environmental Impact Statement

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "guidance statement operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 FR IPL DOE CH 630 252 2779 TO RGCP-HQ ., * * STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS Class Waiver of the Government's U.S. and Foreign Patent Rights in Inventions Arising Out of the Research...

202

CEQ Environmental Justice Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

JUSTICE JUSTICE Guidance Under the National Environmental Policy Act Council on Environmental Quality Executive Office of the President Old Executive Office Building, Room 360 Washington, D.C. 20502 (202)395-5750 http://www.whitehouse.gov/CEQ/ December 10, 1997 ii Table of Contents I. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. Executive Order 12898 and the Presidential Memorandum . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 III. Executive Order 12898 and NEPA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 A. NEPA Generally . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 B. Principles for Considering Environmental Justice under NEPA . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 1. General Principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2. Additional Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

203

Policy and Guidance Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environmental Protection, Sustainability Support & Corporate Safety Analysis Environmental Protection, Sustainability Support & Corporate Safety Analysis HS-20 Home Mission & Functions » Office of Nuclear Safety, Quality Assurance & Environment » Sustainability Support » Environmental Policy & Assistance » Corporate Safety Programs » Analysis Program Contacts What's New? Sustainability Support Environment Corporate Safety Programs Analysis Environment Environmental Policy Environmental Guidance Environmental Reports Environmental Management System Radiation Protection Environmental Compliance Environmental Justice Environmental Training Environmental Tools Search Our Documents Topics & Resources Air Analytical Services Program CERCLA Cultural & Natural Resources DOE Comments on Rulemakings Federal Environmental Laws

204

PUBLIC HEALTH STATEMENT MERCURY  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This Public Health Statement is the summary chapter from the Toxicological Profile for Mercury. It is one in a series of Public Health Statements about hazardous substances and their health effects. A shorter version, the ToxFAQs, is also available. This information is important because this substance may harm you. The effects of exposure to any hazardous substance depend on the dose, the duration, how you are exposed, personal traits and habits, and whether other chemicals are

unknown authors

1999-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

205

Active Project Justification Statements  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Project Justification Statements Project Justification Statements Date Received PJS Number Title Owner / Author Status ORG Due Date 10/26/2012 PJS-2012-007 Cost Benefit Analysis for Nuclear Facility Accident Prevention or Mitigation Design Options, Project Justification 1/9/2013 PJS-2013-01 DOE HDBK of Optimizing Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment 6/24/2013 PJS-2013-03 Review and Approval of Nuclear Facility

206

DOE Audit Guidance for For-Profit Financial Assistance Awards (Part I)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

I) I) April 2012 1 I. GENERAL AUDIT PROGRAM A. PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY The following General Audit Program provides requirements and guidance for independent audit organizations in conducting program compliance audits of for-profit recipients of federal financial assistance from the Department of Energy (DOE) under DOE's Financial Assistance regulations at 10 CFR 600.316. The requirements for financial statement audits of for-profit recipients are not provided for under Regulation 10 CFR 600.316, which applies only to program compliance audits. As such, this Audit Program and all compliance supplements (Parts II and III of this guidance) do not apply to financial statement audits. DOE is not requiring an audit of financial statements solely to

207

EIS-0281: Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statement Statement EIS-0281: Draft Environmental Impact Statement DOE proposes to continue operating the Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico (SNL/NM) located in central New Mexico. The DOE has identified and assessed three alternatives for the operation of SNL/NM: (1) No Action, (2) Expanded Operations, and (3) Reduced Operations. The Expanded Operations Alternative is the DOE's preferred alternative (exclusive of the Microsystems and Engineering Sciences Applications Complex configuration). EIS-0281-DEIS-1999-Summary-Chapts1-4_1.pdf EIS-0281-DEIS-1999-Appendices_2.pdf EIS-0281-DEIS-1999-MainVolume_10.pdf More Documents & Publications TEE-0074 - In the Matter of GE Appliances & Lighting CX-003794: Categorical Exclusion Determination EIS-0281: Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement

208

Draft environmental impact statement for the siting, construction, and operation of New Production Reactor capacity. Volume 2, Sections 1-6  

SciTech Connect

This (EIS) assesses the potential environmental impacts, both on a broad programmatic level and on a project-specific level, concerning a proposed action to provide new tritium production capacity to meet the nation`s nuclear defense requirements well into the 21st century. A capacity equivalent to that of about a 3,000-megawatt (thermal) heavy-water reactor was assumed as a reference basis for analysis in this EIS; this is the approximate capacity of the existing production reactors at DOE`s Savannah River Site. The EIS programmatic alternatives address Departmental decisions to be made on whether to build new production facilities, whether to build one or more complexes, what size production capacity to provide, and when to provide this capacity. Project-specific impacts for siting, constructing, and operating new production reactor capacity are assessed for three alternative sites: the Hanford Site near Richland, Washington; the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory near Idaho Falls, Idaho; and the Savannah River Site. For each site, the impacts of three reactor technologies (and supporting facilities) are assessed: a heavy-water reactor, a light-water reactor, and a modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactor. Impacts of the no-action alternative also are assessed. The EIS evaluates impacts related to air quality; noise levels; surface water, groundwater, and wetlands; land use; recreation; visual environment; biotic resources; historical, archaeological, and cultural resources; socioeconomics; transportation; waste management; and human health and safety. The EIS describes in detail the potential radioactive releases from new production reactors and support facilities and assesses the potential doses to workers and the general public. This volume contains the analysis of programmatic alternatives, project alternatives, affected environment of alternative sites, environmental consequences, and environmental regulations and permit requirements.

1991-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

209

Federal Real Property Council Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Real Property Council Federal Real Property Council Guidance for Improved Asset Management December 22, 2004 Federal Real Property Council Guidance for Improved Asset Management Table of Contents I. Overview............................................................................. 1 II. Guiding Principles .................................................................... 3 III. Asset Management Plan - Required Components............................... 4 IV. Asset Management Plan - "Shelf Document".................................. 5 V. Inventory Data Elements and Performance Measures Definitions.......... 26 i Federal Real Property Council Guidance for Improved Asset Management I. Overview On February 4, 2004, President Bush signed Executive Order 13327, "Federal Real Property

210

Design of highwall mining equipment electronic guidance package  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report provides design specifics and guidance software for a guidance system intended for use in guiding an auger type highwall mining head through thin coal seams to depths of up to 600 ft. A small desk top computer is used at the operator's station to send and receive signals in serialized bit streams to a downhole microprocessor. The guidance system accepts signals from a variety of sensors and uses these signals to plot and control the course of the auger head automatically using computer algorithms designed to keep the auger head in the coal seam and maintain a specified stump thickness.

Brenden, B.B.; Morgen, G.P.; Shorpik, J.R.; Farrar, R.

1981-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

211

EIS-0403: Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0403: Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States Abstract: The BLM and DOE are considering taking actions to facilitate solar energy development in compliance with various orders, mandates, and agency policies. For the BLM, these actions include the evaluation of a new BLM Solar Energy Program applicable to all utility-scale solar energy development on BLM-administered lands in six southwestern states (Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah). For DOE, they include the evaluation of developing new program guidance relevant to DOE-supported solar projects. The Draft PEIS assesses the environmental, social, and economic effects of the agencies' proposed actions and

212

EIS-0403: Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0403: Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States (AZ, CA, CO, NV, NM, and UT) The BLM and DOE have jointly prepared this PEIS to evaluate actions that the agencies are considering taking to further facilitate utility-scale solar energy development in six southwestern states. For the BLM, this includes the evaluation of a new Solar Energy Program applicable to solar development on BLM-administered lands. For DOE, it includes the evaluation of developing new guidance to further facilitate utility-scale solar energy development and maximize the mitigation of associated potential environmental impacts. This Solar PEIS evaluates the potential environmental, social, and economic effects of the agencies'

213

2010 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and 0 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and Template 2010 Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Memo, Guidance and Template The Department of Energy Federal Technical Capability Order, DOE 0 426.1, requires that managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities. This workforce analysis process continues to cover technical capability needs to address defense nuclear facility and related operational hazards. Memo and Workforce Analysis Guidance for FR, SSO, STSM & TQP Template-2010.docx Description TEMPLATE More Documents & Publications 2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Carlsbad Field

214

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission`s fiscal year 1996 financial statement audit  

SciTech Connect

This report presents the results of the independent certified public accountants` audit of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission`s (FERC) financial statements as of September 30, 1996. The auditors have expressed an unqualified opinion on the 1996 statement of financial position and the related statements of operations and changes in net position.

NONE

1997-02-14T23:59:59.000Z

215

EIS-0231: Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1: Draft Environmental Impact Statement 1: Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0231: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Draft Environmental Impact Statement Navajo Transmission Project This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts of a proposal to by Dine Power Authority, a Navajo Nation enterprise, to construct, operate, and maintain a 500 kilovolt (kV) transmission line planned to deliver electric power from the Four Comers area in northwestern New Mexico across northern Arizona to a terminus in southeastern Nevada. The proposed project, the Navajo Transmission Project, is currentiy planned to be in service in the year 2001 and operate for about 50 years. EIS-0231-DEIS-1996.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1470: Final Environmental Assessment EIS-0256: Final Environmental Impact Statement

216

EIS-0236-S1: Draft Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

S1: Draft Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Impact S1: Draft Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0236-S1: Draft Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement This Supplemental DEIS evaluates the potential environmental impacts of continuing to construct and operate the National Ignition Facility at LLNL with respect to any potential or confirmed contamination in the area by hazardous, toxic, and/or radioactive materials." EIS-0236-S1-DEIS-1999.pdf EIS-0236-S1-DEIS-Figures-1999.pdf More Documents & Publications EIS-0236-S1: Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0236: Record of Decision DOE/EIS-0236, Oakland Operations Office, National Ignition Facility Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement to the Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Volume II:

217

EIS-0286: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement 6: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement EIS-0286: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement Richland Operations Office, Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program, Richland, Washington The revised draft of the Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement (HSW EIS) provides environmental and technical information concerning U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) proposed waste management practices at the Hanford Site. DOE/EIS-0286, Richland Operations Office, Revised Draft Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement, Richland, Washington - Summary (March 2003) EIS-0286-D2-DEIS-01-2003.pdf EIS-0286-D2-DEIS-02-2003_0.pdf More Documents & Publications

218

EIS-0236-S1: Draft Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

36-S1: Draft Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Impact 36-S1: Draft Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0236-S1: Draft Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement This Supplemental DEIS evaluates the potential environmental impacts of continuing to construct and operate the National Ignition Facility at LLNL with respect to any potential or confirmed contamination in the area by hazardous, toxic, and/or radioactive materials." EIS-0236-S1-DEIS-1999.pdf EIS-0236-S1-DEIS-Figures-1999.pdf More Documents & Publications EIS-0236-S1: Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement DOE/EIS-0236, Oakland Operations Office, National Ignition Facility Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement to the Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Volume II:

219

Cask system design guidance for robotic handling  

SciTech Connect

Remote automated cask handling has the potential to reduce both the occupational exposure and the time required to process a nuclear waste transport cask at a handling facility. The ongoing Advanced Handling Technologies Project (AHTP) at Sandia National Laboratories is described. AHTP was initiated to explore the use of advanced robotic systems to perform cask handling operations at handling facilities for radioactive waste, and to provide guidance to cask designers regarding the impact of robotic handling on cask design. The proof-of-concept robotic systems developed in AHTP are intended to extrapolate from currently available commercial systems to the systems that will be available by the time that a repository would be open for operation. The project investigates those cask handling operations that would be performed at a nuclear waste repository facility during cask receiving and handling. The ongoing AHTP indicates that design guidance, rather than design specification, is appropriate, since the requirements for robotic handling do not place severe restrictions on cask design but rather focus on attention to detail and design for limited dexterity. The cask system design features that facilitate robotic handling operations are discussed, and results obtained from AHTP design and operation experience are summarized. The application of these design considerations is illustrated by discussion of the robot systems and their operation on cask feature mock-ups used in the AHTP project. 11 refs., 11 figs.

Griesmeyer, J.M.; Drotning, W.D.; Morimoto, A.K.; Bennett, P.C.

1990-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

220

EPA cover memo related to guidance on filing EISs  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

E0~4?e* E0~4?e* ~"+n~ @s!zz : UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY J - WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 %'& OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT Dear Sir or Madame: The Council on Environraental Quality (CEQ) Regulations require the nfili.ng" of Federal Environmental Impact Statements ( EISS ) . These are filed at the Office of Federal (OFA) Activities, US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). As manager of the filing process, OFA periodically recirculates the Filing System Guidance (dated March 7, 1989) to all federal agencies as a reminder of the procedures to be followed when filing an EIS and to help those who may be new to the process. In addition to the enclosed Guidance docunent, you might be w interested in the following commonly asked questions related to the timing for filing EISS. Q: A: Q: A: When EIS he filed, . can an 7 g1506.9 states that an EIS cannot be filed with EPA any earlier than

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "guidance statement operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

EPA cover memo related to guidance on filing EISs  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

E0~4?e* E0~4?e* ~"+n~ @s!zz : UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY J - WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 %'& OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT Dear Sir or Madame: The Council on Environraental Quality (CEQ) Regulations require the nfili.ng" of Federal Environmental Impact Statements ( EISS ) . These are filed at the Office of Federal (OFA) Activities, US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). As manager of the filing process, OFA periodically recirculates the Filing System Guidance (dated March 7, 1989) to all federal agencies as a reminder of the procedures to be followed when filing an EIS and to help those who may be new to the process. In addition to the enclosed Guidance docunent, you might be w interested in the following commonly asked questions related to the timing for filing EISS. Q: A: Q: A: When EIS he filed, . can an 7 g1506.9 states that an EIS cannot be filed with EPA any earlier than

222

Enforcement Guidance Supplements (EGS)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Supplements (EGS) Supplements (EGS) EGS 05-01: Contractor Investigation, Causal Analysis, and Corrective Actions (09/23/2005) EGS 03-02: Revision to Occurrence Report-Based Noncompliance Tracking System Reporting Criteria (09/05/2003) EGS 03-01: Supplemental Guidance Concerning the Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.23 (07/21/2003) EGS 02-01: Enforcement Position Relative to 10 CFR 835 Bioassay Accreditation (02/21/2002) EGS 01-02: Management and Independent Assessment (12/17/2001) EGS 01-01: Nuclear Weapons Program Enforcement Issues (10/15/2001) EGS 00-04: Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.23 and Compliance Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR Subpart C (10/26/2000) EGS 00-03: Specific Issues on Applicability of 10 CFR 830 (09/12/2000)

223

Guidance Systems Division ,  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Oockec No. 10-0772 Oockec No. 10-0772 22 OCT 1981 Bcndlx CorporaLion ' Guidance Systems Division , ATTN: Mr. Wf 11 la,,, Hnrr,,or Manngar, PlanL Englne0rtny Teterboro, New Jersey 07608 uwm STATES NUCLEAll I-IEOULATOIJY COMMISSION REGION i 631 PARK A"LH"I KIN0 OF PR"ISIA. PCNNIVLVANIA ID40' Gentlemen: Subject: Inspectfon 81-15 _ "-- .,; .z .;; Thts refers to the closeout safety \nspectlon conducted by Ms. M. Campbell of this office on August 27, 1961, of activities formerly authorized by NRC License No. STB-424 and to the c!lscussions of our findings held by f4s. Campbell with yourseif aL Lhe conclusion of the inspection. This closeout inspection. was conducted as part of an NRC effort to ensure that facilities where,llcensed activities were forxrrly conducted meet current NRC criteria for release for

224

Nuclear Maintenance Applications Center: Emergency Diesel Generator Single Component Vulnerability Review Guidance.  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report provides guidance to owners and operators of nuclear power plants on performing emergency diesel generator (EDG) system single component vulnerability reviews. This guidance was developed based on a recommendation from the nuclear industrys EDG Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) that plants perform a single component vulnerability review as discussed in the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations Industry Experience Report ...

2013-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

225

Environmental Impact Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statement Statement for the Proposed Abengoa Biorefinery Project near Hugoton, Stevens County, Kansas Volume 1 - Chapters U.S. Department of Energy Golden Field Office Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy DOE/EIS-0407D September 2009 Draft Cover photos courtesy of (left to right): Southeast Renewable Fuels, LLC DOE National Renewable Energy Laboratory Public domain Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Abengoa Biorefinery Project near Hugoton, Stevens County, Kansas Volume 1 - Chapters U.S. Department of Energy Golden Field Office Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy DOE/EIS-0407D September 2009 DOE/EIS-0407D COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) COOPERATING AGENCY: The U.S. Department of Agriculture-Rural Development is a cooperating

226

Accelerator Operations and Physics - Advanced Photon Source  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Accelerator Operations & Physics Accelerator Systems Division---Argonne National Laboratory Mission Statement Safe, reliable, attentive, and responsive operation of APS accelerator...

227

Finanacial Statement: WR-FS-99-01 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Operations Office during The Audit of The Department's Consolidated Fiscal year 1998 Financial Statements WR-FS-99-01.PDF More Documents & Publications Audit Report:...

228

Guidance for Deployment of Mobile Technologies for Nuclear Power Plant  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Guidance for Deployment of Mobile Technologies for Nuclear Power Guidance for Deployment of Mobile Technologies for Nuclear Power Plant Field Workers Guidance for Deployment of Mobile Technologies for Nuclear Power Plant Field Workers This report is a guidance document prepared for the benefit of commercial nuclear power plants' (NPPs) supporting organizations and personnel who are considering or undertaking deployment of mobile technology for the purpose of improving human performance and plant status control (PSC) for field workers in an NPP setting. This document especially is directed at NPP business managers, Electric Power Research Institute, Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, and other non-Information Technology personnel. This information is not intended to replace basic project management practices or reiterate these processes, but is to support decision-making,

229

EPA Climate Leaders Mobile Source Guidance | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

EPA Climate Leaders Mobile Source Guidance EPA Climate Leaders Mobile Source Guidance Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name: EPA Climate Leaders Mobile Source Guidance Agency/Company /Organization: United States Environmental Protection Agency Sector: Energy Focus Area: Transportation Phase: Determine Baseline Topics: GHG inventory Resource Type: Guide/manual Website: www.epa.gov/climateleaders/resources/cross-sector.html Country: United States Cost: Free UN Region: Northern America References: http://www.epa.gov/climateleaders/resources/cross-sector.html Logo: EPA Climate Leaders Mobile Source Guidance "This module is used to identify and estimate direct GHG emissions associated with fossil fuel combustion in owned or operated mobile sources. The module is divided into Road, Air, Waterborne, Rail Transport, and Other

230

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 01-01, Nuclear Weapon Program Enforcement Issues  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enforcement Guidance Supplement Enforcement Guidance Supplement EGS:01-01 Appendix E-Operational Procedures for Enforcement Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 October 15, 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR: DOE PAAA COORDINATORS CONTRACTOR PAAA COORDINATORS FROM: R. KEITH CHRISTOPHER DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND INVESTIGATION SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 01-01: Nuclear Weapon Program Enforcement Issues Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedures for Enforcement, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity for the Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) to periodically issue clarifying guidance regarding the processes used in its enforcement

231

Handicapped Parking Guidance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Handicapped Parking Guidance Handicapped Parking Guidance U.S. Department of Energy Headquarters Handicapped Parking Procedures It is the policy of the Department of Energy (DOE)...

232

Guidance Regarding NEPA Regulations | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA Regulations Guidance Regarding NEPA Regulations This document provides Council on Environmental Quality guidance on several topics: scoping, categorical exclusions, adoption...

233

Security and Cyber Guidance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Guidance Security and Cyber Guidance Appraisal Process Guides Security Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide - April 2008 Cyber Security Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide - April...

234

Additional Guidance Regarding Application of Current Procedures...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Additional Guidance Regarding Application of Current Procedures for Testing Energy Consumption of Clothes Washers with Warm Rinse Cycles, Issued: June 30, 2010 Additional Guidance...

235

EIS-0284: Notice of Cancellation of Environmental Impact Statement |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notice of Cancellation of Environmental Impact Statement Notice of Cancellation of Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0284: Notice of Cancellation of Environmental Impact Statement Implementation of the Low-Emission Boiler System (LEBS) Proof-of-Concept System, Elkhart, Illinois The Department of Energy (DOE) is cancelling the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for a proposal by Babcock Borsig Power to design, construct, and operate an advanced pulverized coal-fired power facility using a low emission boiler system (LEBS) at Elkhart, Illinois. DOE/EIS-0284, Notice of Cancellation of Environmental Impact Statement for Implementation of the Low-Emission Boiler System (LEBS) Proof-of-Concept System, Elkhart, Illinois, 73 FR 11101 (February 2008)

236

EIS-0416: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Environmental Impact Statement Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0416: Final Environmental Impact Statement Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has received a proposal from Solar Partners I, II, IV, and VIII, limited liability corporations formed by BrightSource Energy (BrightSource), to construct and operate a solar thermal electric generating facility in San Bernardino County, California. The project would generate up to 400 megawatts (MW) of electricity using solar thermal technology. California Desert Conservation Area Plan Amendment/Final Environmental Impact Statement for Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System, DOE/EIS-0416 (July 2010) More Documents & Publications EIS-0416: Record of Decision EIS-0354: Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Summary

237

Closing Statement to the GNEP Ministerial | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statement to the GNEP Ministerial Statement to the GNEP Ministerial Closing Statement to the GNEP Ministerial October 1, 2008 - 3:43pm Addthis Remarks as Prepared for Secretary Bodman Thank you, Minister Borloo . . . and many thanks to the French government for hosting this meeting and for your leadership within GNEP. I also want to acknowledge the four newest members of our Partnership: Armenia, Estonia, Morocco and Oman, each of which signed our Statement of Principles today. As Minister Borloo indicated, today the GNEP members adopted a Joint Statement that reaffirms our strong commitment to ensuring that the expansion of civilian nuclear power is done safely and securely. . . in a manner that reduces the risk of nuclear proliferation and responsibly manages used nuclear fuel. Our Partnership operates with an eye to the future and a firm and realistic

238

EIS-0460: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0: Final Environmental Impact Statement 0: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0460: Final Environmental Impact Statement FutureGen 2.0 Project, Morgan County, Illinois This EIS evaluates the potential environmental impacts of DOE's proposed action to provide approximately $1 billion in cost-shared American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funding to the FutureGen Industrial Alliance, Inc. (Alliance) to support the planning, design, construction, and operation of a prototype power plant, including the capture, conveyance, and sequestration of carbon dioxide (CO2). EIS-0460-FEIS-Summary-2013.pdf EIS-0460-FEIS-Volume1-2013.pdf EIS-0460-FEIS-Volume2-Part1-2013.pdf EIS-0460-FEIS-Volume2_Part2-2013.pdf More Documents & Publications EIS-0460: Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0460: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement

239

EIS-0451: Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

51: Draft Environmental Impact Statement 51: Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0451: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Hooper Springs Project, Caribou County, Idaho This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts of DOE's Bonneville Power Administration's proposal to construct, operate, and maintain a single-circuit, 115-kilovolt (kV) transmission line and a 138/115-kV substation (collectively referred to as the Hooper Springs Project). The new substation would be located adjacent to PacifiCorp's existing 345/138-kV Threemile Knoll Substation, located near the City of Soda Springs in Caribou County, Idaho. EIS-0451-DEIS-Volume1-2013.pdf EIS-0451-DEIS-Volume2-2013.pdf More Documents & Publications EIS-0451: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0325: Draft Environmental Impact Statement

240

EIS-0345: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

345: Final Environmental Impact Statement 345: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0345: Final Environmental Impact Statement Plymouth Generating Facility Plymouth, Washington Plymouth Energy, L.L.C. proposes to construct and operate a 307-megawatt (MW), natural gas-fired, combined cycle power generation facility that would be interconnected with BPA's regional transmission system.This environmental impact statement (EIS) evaluates the environmental effects of the proposed project and determines if any environmental impacts would result. The environmental evaluation of the proposed project includes the proposed power generation facility, which includes the plant, gas pipeline, and water supply/wastewater pipeline; high voltage transmission interconnection; and access road. Final Environmental Impact Statement Plymouth Generating Facility Plymouth,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "guidance statement operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Department of Energy Environmental Impact Statement Public Scoping Meeting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Environmental Impact Statement Public Scoping Department of Energy Environmental Impact Statement Public Scoping Meeting on Northern Pass Transmission Line Project Department of Energy Environmental Impact Statement Public Scoping Meeting on Northern Pass Transmission Line Project Washington, D.C. - The Department of Energy (DOE) will host seven public scoping meetings as part of its Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) preparation process pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to assess the potential nvironmental impacts from its proposed action of granting a Presidential permit to Northern Pass Transmission to construct, operate, maintain, and connect a new electric transmission line across the U.S.-Canada border in northern New Hampshire. Department of Energy Environmental Impact Statement Public Scoping Meeting

242

EIS-0062: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EIS-0062: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0062: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0062: Final Environmental Impact Statement Waste Management Operations Double-Shell Tanks for Defense High-Level Radioactive Waste Storage Savannah River Plant, Aiken, South Carolina This final environmental impact statement (EIS) has been prepared in compliance with the September 29, 1979, order of the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia (Natural Resources Defense Council, et al., V. Administrator ERDA/DOE, et al. (D.D.c. Civ. No. 76-1691). The statement analyzes the impacts of the various design alternatives for the construction of fourteen 1.3 million gallon high-activity radioactive waste tanks. The EIS evaluates the effects of these alternative designs on tank durability, on the ease of waste retrieval from such tanks, and the choice

243

EIS-0451: Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1: Draft Environmental Impact Statement 1: Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0451: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Hooper Springs Project, Caribou County, Idaho This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts of DOE's Bonneville Power Administration's proposal to construct, operate, and maintain a single-circuit, 115-kilovolt (kV) transmission line and a 138/115-kV substation (collectively referred to as the Hooper Springs Project). The new substation would be located adjacent to PacifiCorp's existing 345/138-kV Threemile Knoll Substation, located near the City of Soda Springs in Caribou County, Idaho. EIS-0451-DEIS-Volume1-2013.pdf EIS-0451-DEIS-Volume2-2013.pdf More Documents & Publications EIS-0451: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0325: Draft Environmental Impact Statement

244

EIS-0345: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Environmental Impact Statement Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0345: Final Environmental Impact Statement Plymouth Generating Facility Plymouth, Washington Plymouth Energy, L.L.C. proposes to construct and operate a 307-megawatt (MW), natural gas-fired, combined cycle power generation facility that would be interconnected with BPA's regional transmission system.This environmental impact statement (EIS) evaluates the environmental effects of the proposed project and determines if any environmental impacts would result. The environmental evaluation of the proposed project includes the proposed power generation facility, which includes the plant, gas pipeline, and water supply/wastewater pipeline; high voltage transmission interconnection; and access road. Final Environmental Impact Statement Plymouth Generating Facility Plymouth,

245

Environmental Impact Statements and Environmental Assessments Status Chart  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 8, 2007 November 8, 2007 EIS-0382: DOE Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Mesaba Energy Project, Itasca, Minnesota October 17, 2007 EIS-0402: Advance Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement Remediation of Area IV of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory August 10, 2007 EIS-0400: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement Granby Pumping Plant Switchyard-Windy Gap Substation Transmission Line Rebuild Project, Grand County, CO July 23, 2007 EIS-0375: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement Disposal of Greater-Than-Class C Low-Level Radioactive Waste August 31, 2006 EIS-0380: Notice to Extend Comment Period on the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New

246

EIS-0379 - Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- Final Environmental Impact Statement - Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0379 - Final Environmental Impact Statement This Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) assesses the potential environmental impacts that would result from a proposed Department of Energy (DOE) action on the proposed rebuilding, operation, and maintenance of a 17-mile-long portion of BPA's Libby to Bonners Ferry 115-kilovolt (kV) Transmission Line in Lincoln County, Montana. The portion to be rebuilt would start at Flathead Electric Cooperative's (FEC) Libby Substation, in the town of Libby, Montana, and proceed west along an existing right-of-way for about 17 miles, terminating at BPA's Troy Substation just east of the town of Troy, Montana. EIS-0379-FEIS-2008 More Documents & Publications EIS-0379: Draft Environmental Impact Statement

247

EIS-0379 - Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EIS-0379 - Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0379 - Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0379 - Final Environmental Impact Statement This Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) assesses the potential environmental impacts that would result from a proposed Department of Energy (DOE) action on the proposed rebuilding, operation, and maintenance of a 17-mile-long portion of BPA's Libby to Bonners Ferry 115-kilovolt (kV) Transmission Line in Lincoln County, Montana. The portion to be rebuilt would start at Flathead Electric Cooperative's (FEC) Libby Substation, in the town of Libby, Montana, and proceed west along an existing right-of-way for about 17 miles, terminating at BPA's Troy Substation just east of the town of Troy, Montana. EIS-0379-FEIS-2008 More Documents & Publications EIS-0379: Draft Environmental Impact Statement

248

STATEMENT OF WORK  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

PART III - SECTION J APPENDIX B STATEMENT OF WORK Table of Contents 1.0 General.................................................................................................................... 273 2.0 Laboratory Mission and Scope of Work. ................................................................ 274 3.0 Science & Technology. ........................................................................................... 275 3.1 Defense Programs. .................................................................................................. 276 3.1.1 Stewardship of United States Nuclear Weapons. ................................................ 276 3.1.1.1 Stockpile Certification. .......................................................................................

249

Information Systems Engineering Guidance (ISEG)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Departmental Information Systems Engineering (DISE) Departmental Information Systems Engineering (DISE) Guidance Volume 2 Managing DOE IT Projects March 26, 2002 Revised December 27, 2002 Developed by the Software Quality and Systems Engineering Program Office of the Chief Information Officer Departmental Information Systems Engineering Guidance Title Page Document Series: Departmental Information Systems Engineering (DISE) Guidance Document Name: Volume 2, Managing DOE IT Projects Publication Date: 03/26/03, Revised 12/27/02 Document Owner: Office of the Chief Information Officer Software Quality and Systems Engineering Brenda Coblentz, IM-21, Program Manager Acknowledgement: Wayne Jones, author of the DOE (HQ) IM Project Management Guide, September 1998

250

Final Environmental Impact Statement to construct and operate a facility to receive, store, and dispose of 11e.(2) byproduct material near Clive, Utah (Docket No. 40-8989)  

SciTech Connect

A Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) related to the licensing of Envirocare of Utah, Inc.`s proposed disposal facility in Tooele county, Utah (Docket No. 40-8989) for byproduct material as defined in Section 11e.(2) of the Atomic Energy Act, as amended, has been prepared by the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. This statement describes and evaluates the purpose of and need for the proposed action, the alternatives considered, and the environmental consequences of the proposed action. The NRC has concluded that the proposed action evaluated under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) and 10 CFR Part 51, is to permit the applicant to proceed with the project as described in this Statement.

Not Available

1993-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

251

All NEPA Guidance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Guidance & Requirements » Guidance » All NEPA Guidance Guidance & Requirements » Guidance » All NEPA Guidance All NEPA Guidance Council on Environmental Quality Guidance Final Guidance on Improving the Process for Preparing Efficient and Timely Environmental Reviews Under the National Environmental Policy Act (2012) Appropriate Use of Mitigation and Monitoring and Clarifying the Appropriate Use of Mitigated Findings of No Significant Impact (2011) Guidance for Federal Departments and Agencies on Establishing, Applying, and Revising Categorical Exclusions under NEPA (2010) Memorandum for Heads of Federal Departments and Agencies: Emergencies and NEPA (2010) A Citizen's Guide to the NEPA: Having Your Voice Heard (2007) Guidance on the Consideration of Past Actions in Cumulative Effects Analysis (2005) Memorandum for Federal NEPA Contacts: Emergency Actions and

252

EPA issues interim final waste minimization guidance  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released a new and detailed interim final guidance to assist hazardous waste generators in certifying they have a waste minimization program in place under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA's guidance identifies the basic elements of a waste minimization program in place that, if present, will allow people to certify they have implemented a program to reduce the volume and toxicity of hazardous waste to the extent economically practical. The guidance is directly applicable to generators of 1000 or more kilograms per month of hazardous waste, or large-quantity generators, and to owners and operators of hazardous waste treatment, storage or disposal facilities who manage their own hazardous waste on site. Small-quantity generators that generate more than 100 kilograms, but less than 1,000 kilograms, per month of hazardous waste are not subject to the same program in place certification requirement. Rather, they must certify on their manifests that they have made a good faith effort to minimize their waste generation.

Bergeson, L.L.

1993-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

253

Building Energy Use Benchmarking Guidance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Building Energy Use Benchmarking Guidance April 15, 2010 EISA SECTION 432 - Benchmarking of Federal Facilities (42 U.S.C. 8253 Subsection (f), Use of Energy and Water Efficiency...

254

Statement of C. Paul Robinson, Director Sandia National Laboratories Statement for the Record  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Mr. Chairman and distinguished members of the committee, thank you for the opportunity to submit this statement. I am Paul Robinson, director of Sandia National Laboratories. Sandia is managed and operated for the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) by Sandia Corporation, a subsidiary of

C. Paul Robinson; Strategic Subcommittee; C. Paul Robinson

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

255

FEMP UESC Data Confidentiality Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contract (UESC) Contract (UESC) Data Collection Confidentiality Statement The Department of Energy Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) and Energetics Incorporated maintain strict confidentiality and security of records of reported Utility Energy Services Contracts (UESCs). Reported data is never released to a third-party without consent and data is securely maintained through FEMP Central (password protected database operated by Project Performance Corporation [PPC]). The data is reported occasionally to the Department of Energy only on an aggregate-level to demonstrate the growth of the UESC contracting vehicle and to better understand the UESC market and trends in investment. Questions regarding the data collection of UESC projects can be directed to Evan Fuka (efuka@energetics.com).

256

EIS-0411: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0411: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement Construction, Operation, and Maintenance of the Proposed Transmission Agency of Northern California Transmission Project, California Notice of Intent to prepare an environmental impact statement for the Western Area Power Administration construction, operation, and maintenance of the proposed transmission agency of Northern California Transmission Project, California. Western Area Power Administration Construction, Operation, and Maintenance of the Proposed Transmission Agency of Northern California Transmission Project, California, DOE/EIS-0411 (February 2009) 74 FR 8086 More Documents & Publications EIS-0411: Notice of Cancellation of the Environmental Impact Statement

257

PROPOSAL AND AWARD GUIDANCE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

conference) or solely for the purpose of operating Fermilab facilities. It will cover salary for a more extended duration OR a series of visits to the Laboratory, but not both. c....

258

Asbestos/NESHAP adequately wet guidance  

SciTech Connect

The Asbestos NESHAP requires facility owners and/or operators involved in demolition and renovation activities to control emissions of particulate asbestos to the outside air because no safe concentration of airborne asbestos has ever been established. The primary method used to control asbestos emissions is to adequately wet the Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) with a wetting agent prior to, during and after demolition/renovation activities. The purpose of the document is to provide guidance to asbestos inspectors and the regulated community on how to determine if friable ACM is adequately wet as required by the Asbestos NESHAP.

Shafer, R.; Throwe, S.; Salgado, O.; Garlow, C.; Hoerath, E.

1990-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

259

2012 Annual Planning Summary for Savannah River Operations Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2012 and 2013 within Savannah River Operations Office.

260

EIS-0281: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Summary (Spanish) |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statement Summary (Spanish) Statement Summary (Spanish) EIS-0281: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Summary (Spanish) DOE proposes to continue operating the Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico (SNL/NM) located in central New Mexico. The DOE has identified and assessed three alternatives for the operation of SNL/NM: (1) No Action, (2) Expanded Operations, and (3) Reduced Operations. The Expanded Operations Alternative is the DOE's preferred alternative (exclusive of the Microsystems and Engineering Sciences Applications Complex configuration). EIS-0281-DEIS-Spanish_Summary-1999.pdf More Documents & Publications Ahorre Energía 2013 National Environmental Justice Conference and Training Program PREPARATIVOS EN MARCHA PARA LA CONFERENCIA SOBRE JUSTICIA AMBIENTAL NACIONAL Y EL PROGRAMA DE CAPACITACIÓN 2014

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "guidance statement operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

EIS-0349: Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Draft Environmental Impact Statement Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0349: Draft Environmental Impact Statement BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project BP West Coast Products, LLC proposes to construct and operate a 720-megawatt, natural-gas-fired, combined-cycle cogeneration facility on land adjacent to its BP Cherry Point Refinery. Approximately 195 acres of undeveloped land would be converted for the cogeneration facility; gas, water, wastewater, and steam pipelines; construction laydown areas; access roads; and wetland mitigation areas.This Draft EIS assesses the existing natural and built environment, evaluates the potential environmental impacts and economic benefits of the proposed action, and identifies mitigation measures to compensate for the unavoidable impacts. Alternative

262

EIS-0383: Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Draft Environmental Impact Statement Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0383: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Orlando Gasification Project This EIS assesses the potential environmental impacts that would result from a proposed DOE action to provide cost-shared funding for construction and operation of facilities at Orlando Utilities Commission's (OUC's) existing Stanton Energy Center near Orlando, Florida. The project has been selected for further consideration by DOE under the Clean Coal Power Initiative (CCPI) to demonstrate advanced power generation systems using Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) technology. Although DOE funding would support only the Orlando Gasification Project (i.e., coal gasifier, synthesis gas cleanup systems, and supporting infrastructure),

263

Selected Guidance & Requirements | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Selected Guidance & Requirements Selected Guidance & Requirements Selected Guidance & Requirements This page contains the most requested NEPA guidance and requirement documents and those most often recommended by the Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance. Documents are listed by agency, in reverse chronological order. More extensive collections of documents are available on the individual pages for Guidance and Requirements pages. Requirements - Statutes National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 Environmental Quality Improvement Act of 1970 Clean Air Act, Section 309 Guidance - Council on Environmental Quality NEPA at 19: A Primer on an "Old" Law with Solutions to New Problems 40 Most Asked Questions Concerning CEQ's NEPA Regulations Guidance - Department of Energy DOE, NEPA, and You

264

Guidance & Requirements | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Guidance & Requirements Guidance & Requirements Guidance & Requirements The Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance provides guidance and requirement documents to the NEPA community to ensure that the Department's proposed actions comply with the letter and spirit of the National Environmental Policy Act, and to assist the interested public in reviewing NEPA documents. Guidance Guidance documents from the Council on Environmental Quality, Department of Energy, Environmental Protection Agency, and other federal agencies applicable to NEPA proposed actions. Requirements A collection of statutes, Council on Environmental Quality regulations, Department of Energy regulations, and Executive Orders applicable to NEPA proposed actions. Lessons Learned Quarterly Report A collection of guidance, case studies, analyses, references, litigation

265

Implementation Plan. Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In accordance with the Department of Energy`s National Environmental Policy Act implementing procedures in Volume 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 1021,312, the Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Implementation Plan has two primary purposes: to provide guidance for the preparation of the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement and to record the issues resulting from the scoping and the extended public participation process. The Implementation Plan identifies and discusses the following: background of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management activities, the purpose of the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, and the relationship of the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement to other Departmental initiatives (Chapter 1); need and purposes for action (Chapter 2); scoping process and results of the public participation program in defining the scope of the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, including a summary of the comments received and their disposition (Chapter 3); planned scope and content of the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (Chapter 4); consultations with other agencies and the role of cooperating agencies (Chapter 5); planned schedule of major Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement milestones (Chapter 6); and responsibilities for preparation of the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (Chapter 7).

Not Available

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

266

Draft Environmental Impact Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Draft Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Abengoa Biorefinery Project near Hugoton, Stevens County, Kansas Volume 2 - Appendices U.S. Department of Energy Golden Field Office Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy DOE/EIS-0407D September 2009 Cover photos courtesy of (left to right): Southeast Renewable Fuels, LLC DOE National Renewable Energy Laboratory Public domain Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Abengoa Biorefinery Project near Hugoton, Stevens County, Kansas Volume 2 - Appendices U.S. Department of Energy Golden Field Office Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy DOE/EIS-0407D September 2009 COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) COOPERATING AGENCY: The U.S. Department of Agriculture-Rural Development is a cooperating

267

STATEMENT. OF CONSIDERATIONS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

STATEMENT. OF CONSIDERATIONS STATEMENT. OF CONSIDERATIONS REQUEST BY DELPID AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, LLC (DELPHI) FOR AN ADVANCE WAIVER OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN PATENT RIGHTS UNDER DOE AWARD NO. DE-EEOO00478; W(A) 2011-037 DELPID has requested a waiver ofdomestic and foreign patent rights ofthe United . States ofAmerica in all subject inventions arising from its participation under the above referenced cooperative agreement entitled "Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Diesel Auxiliary Power Unit" The cooperative agreement was awarded under the DE-PS36-09G098009 Research Development ofFuel Cell Technologies for Automotive Stationary and Portable Power Applications Funding Opportunity Announcement. PACCAR and IDA Research are also perfonning work under the cooperative agreement. However, this waiver only applies to

268

STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS Request by Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories for an Advance Waiver of Domestic and Foreign Invention Rights under DOE Contract No. DE-OE0000537, W(A) 2011-023, CH-161 0 The Petitioner, Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories (SEL) was awarded the subject cooperative agreement with DOE for the performance of work entitled , "Whitelist Anitvirus Project. " According to the response to question 2 of the waiver petition , the scope of work for this agreement addresses a software application that provides malware protection to computers in a white list approach for embedded Windows and Linux. The goal of this project is to create and market a white list antivirus solution for control systems capable of running on devices that use an

269

Research Statements QNet 1999  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Research Statements from Successful QuarkNet Proposals Research Statements from Successful QuarkNet Proposals February, 1999       Boston University This is the Boston University part of a proposal for a joint site with Northeastern University. We outline two possible projects, which will be chosen according to the interests and time constraints of the teacher. The primary mentor for the teacher assigned to BU will be Prof. U. Heintz. Mentoring responsibilities at Fermilab will be shared with Prof. D. Wood from Northeastern University. Project 1: ========== Experience & skills: some experience with instrumentation and the use of a computer is useful. The teacher will be instructed in the use of the software emplyed to control the instrumentation. Project title: Irradiation Studies of Silicon Microstrip Detectors

270

EIS-0426: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6: Final Environmental Impact Statement 6: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0426: Final Environmental Impact Statement This Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Continued Operation of the Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada National Security Site and Off-Site Locations in the State of Nevada (NNSS SWEIS) analyzed the potential environmental impacts of proposed alternatives for continued management and operation of the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) (formerly known as the Nevada Test Site) and other U.S. Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE/NNSA)-managed sites in Nevada, including the Remote Sensing Laboratory (RSL) on Nellis Air Force Base in North Las Vegas, the North Las Vegas Facility (NLVF), the Tonopah Test Range (TTR), and environmental

271

EIS-0435: Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Draft Environmental Impact Statement Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0435: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Modification of the Groton Generation Station Interconnection Agreement, Brown County, South Dakota In response to a request from Basin Electric Power Cooperative (Basin Electric), Western Area Power Administration (Western) proposes to modify its interconnection agreement with Basin Electric for the Groton Generation Station to eliminate Western's 50-megawatts (MW) annual average operating limit. The Groton Generation Station is located about 5 miles south of Groton, South Dakota. Basin Electric needs to eliminate the operating limit to help serve increased load demand for electric power in the eastern portion of its service area Western Area Power Administration Draft Environmental Impact Statement

272

EIS-0389: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Environmental Impact Statement Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0389: Final Environmental Impact Statement Trinity Public Utilities District Direct Interconnection Project The Western Area Power Administration (Western), part of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), prepared an environmental impact statement (EIS) on the construction and operation of proposed power transmission facilities in Trinity County, California. The U.S. Forest Service (USFS), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) participated in the preparation of the EIS, which addresses the proposed removal of about 5.3 mi of 12-kilovolt (kV) distribution line and the construction and operation of about 16 mi of new 60-kV transmission line, a tap structure and associated equipment, and a new switchyard. The

273

CH Packaging Program Guidance  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this document is to provide the technical requirements for preparation for use, operation, inspection, and maintenance of a Transuranic Package Transporter Model II (TRUPACT-II), a HalfPACT Shipping Package, and directly related components. This document complies with the minimum requirements as specified in TRUPACT-II Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP), HalfPACT SARP, and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Certificates of Compliance (C of C) 9218 and 9279, respectively. In the event there is a conflict between this document and the SARP or C of C, the SARP and/or C of C shall govern. C of Cs state: ''each package must be prepared for shipment and operated in accordance with the procedures described in Chapter 7.0, Operating Procedures, of the application.'' They further state: ''each package must be tested and maintained in accordance with the procedures described in Chapter 8.0, Acceptance Tests and Maintenance Program of the Application.'' Chapter 9.0 of the SAR P charges the WIPP Management and Operation (M&O) contractor with assuring packaging is used in accordance with the requirements of the C of C. Because the packaging is NRC-approved, users need to be familiar with 10 CFR 71.11. Any time a user suspects or has indications that the conditions of approval in the C of C were not met, the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) shall be notified immediately. CBFO will evaluate the issue and notify the NRC if required. This document details the instructions to be followed to operate, maintain, and test the TRUPACT-II and HalfPACT packaging. The intent of these instructions is to standardize these operations. All users will follow these instructions or equivalent instructions that assure operations are safe and meet the requirements of the SARPs.

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2002-03-04T23:59:59.000Z

274

CH Packaging Program Guidance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this document is to provide the technical requirements for preparation for use, operation, inspection, and maintenance of a Transuranic Package Transporter Model II (TRUPACT-II), a HalfPACT shipping package, and directly related components. This document complies with the minimum requirements as specified in the TRUPACT-II Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP), HalfPACT SARP, and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Certificates of Compliance (C of C) 9218 and 9279, respectively. In the event of a conflict between this document and the SARP or C of C, the C of C shall govern. The C of Cs state: ''each package must be prepared for shipment and operated in accordance with the procedures described in Chapter 7.0, Operating Procedures, of the application.'' They further state: ''each package must be tested and maintained in accordance with the procedures described in Chapter 8.0, Acceptance Tests and Maintenance Program of the Application.'' Chapter 9.0 of the SARP charges the WIPP management and operating (M&O) contractor with assuring packaging is used in accordance with the requirements of the C of C. Because the packaging is NRC-approved, users need to be familiar with 10 CFR 71.11. Any time a user suspects or has indications that the conditions of approval in the C of C were not met, the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) shall be notified immediately. CBFO will evaluate the issue and notify the NRC if required. This document provides the instructions to be followed to operate, maintain, and test the TRUPACT-II and HalfPACT packaging. The intent of these instructions is to standardize operations. All users will follow these instructions or equivalent instructions that assure operations are safe and meet the requirements of the SARPs.

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2003-04-30T23:59:59.000Z

275

DOE Issues Guidance on Electric Vehicle Recharging Stations | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Electric Vehicle Recharging Stations Electric Vehicle Recharging Stations DOE Issues Guidance on Electric Vehicle Recharging Stations September 6, 2011 - 4:28pm Addthis The U.S. Department of Energy recently issued guidance to its national laboratory management and operating (M&O) contractors on the installation and operation of electric vehicle recharging stations at lab facilities. The guidance explains that lab contractors wishing to install electric vehicle recharging stations or make such stations available to employees and visitors have several options. Lab contractors may install such stations and seek reimbursement from the Department for their use to the extent such installation or use is reasonably required to meet fleet vehicle or demonstration project needs. In addition, lab contractors may install electric vehicle recharging

276

DOE General Counsel Issues Arbitration Guidance for Management and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

General Counsel Issues Arbitration Guidance for Management and General Counsel Issues Arbitration Guidance for Management and Operations Contractors DOE General Counsel Issues Arbitration Guidance for Management and Operations Contractors February 3, 2010 - 5:31pm Addthis Washington, DC - The Office of the General Counsel, in conjunction with the Office of General Counsel of the NNSA, has reviewed the question of whether Department of Energy contractors can include binding arbitration in their contracts with third-parties. We have determined that there is currently no legal prohibition on M&O contractors including binding arbitration clauses in their contracts with others. In fact, we believe it often will be a good idea to include arbitration clauses as a means of limiting the risk of litigation which is often more time consuming and expensive than

277

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission fiscal year 1997 annual financial statements  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report presents the results of the independent certified public accountants` audit of the Federal Energy Regulatory commission`s statements of financial position, and the related statements of operations and changes in net position. The auditors` work was conducted in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. An independent public accounting firm conducted the audit. The auditors` reports on the Commission`s internal control structure and compliance with laws and regulations disclosed no reportable conditions or instances of noncompliance.

NONE

1998-02-24T23:59:59.000Z

278

EIS-0439: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0439: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement Proposed Construction and Operation of the Rice Solar Energy Project, Riverside County, CA Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement/Staff Assessment for the Proposed Construction and Operation of the Rice Solar Energy Project, Riverside County, CA (EIS-0439) Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement/Staff Assessment for the Proposed Construction and Operation of the Rice Solar Energy Project, Riverside County, CA, EIS-0439 (March 2010) (75 FR 15427) More Documents & Publications EIS-0439: DOE Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0439: Draft Environmental Impact Statement

279

HFE Process Guidance and Standards for potential application to updating NRC guidance  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) reviews and evaluates the human factors engineering (HFE) programs of applicants for nuclear power plant construction permits, operating licenses, standard design certifications, and combined operating licenses. The purpose of these safety reviews is to help ensure that personnel performance and reliability are appropriately supported. Detailed design review procedures and guidance for the evaluations is provided in three key documents: the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800), the HFE Program Review Model (NUREG-0711), and the Human-System Interface Design Review Guidelines (NUREG-0700). These documents were last revised in 2007, 2004 and 2002, respectively. The NRC is committed to the periodic update and improvement of these guidance documents to ensure that they remain state-of-the-art design evaluation tools. Thus, the NRC has initiated a project with BNL to update the NRC guidance to remain current with recent research on human performance, advances in HFE methods and tools, and new technology. INL supported Brookhaven National Lab (BNL) to update the detailed HFE review criteria contained in NUREG-0711 and NUREG-0700 based on (1) feedback obtained from end users, (2) the results of NRC research and development efforts supporting the NRC staffs HFE safety reviews, and (3) other material the project staff identify as applicable to the update effort. INL submitted comments on development plans and sections of NUREGs 0800, 0711, and 0700. The contractor prepared the report attached here as the deliverable for this work.

Jacques Hugo; J. J. Persensky

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

280

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 02-01 Enforcement Position Relative to 10 CFR 835 Bioassay Accreditation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 21, 2002 February 21, 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR: DOE PAAA COORDINATORS CONTRACTOR PAAA COORDINATORS FROM: R. KEITH CHRISTOPHER DIRECTOR OFFICE OF PRICE-ANDERSON ENFORCEMENT SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 02-01: Enforcement Position Relative to 10 CFR 835 Bioassay Accreditation Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedures for Enforcement, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity for the Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) to periodically issue clarifying guidance regarding the processes used in its enforcement activities. OE typically issues such guidance in the form of Enforcement Guidance

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "guidance statement operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

EIS-0459: Hawaii Clean Energy Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9: Hawaii Clean Energy Programmatic Environmental Impact 9: Hawaii Clean Energy Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0459: Hawaii Clean Energy Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Summary In 2010, DOE announced its intent to prepare a PEIS for the Hawai'I Interisland Renewable Energy Program (HIREP): Wind (DOE/EIS-0459). In response to public scoping comments, as well as regulatory and policy developments since the scoping meetings, DOE proposes to broaden the range of energy efficiency and renewable energy activities and technologies to be analyzed in the PEIS and, accordingly, has renamed it the Hawai'i Clean Energy PEIS. DOE's proposal involves the development of guidance to use in future funding decisions and other actions to support Hawai'i in achieving the goal established in the Hawai'i Clean Energy Initiative

282

EIS-0459: Hawaii Clean Energy Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

DOE proposes to develop guidance to use in future funding decisions and other actions to support Hawaii in achieving the goal established in the Hawaii Clean Energy Initiative to meet 70% of the States energy needs by 2030 through energy efficiency and renewable energy. The Hawai'i Clean Energy Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement will assess, at a programmatic level, the potential environmental impacts associated with energy efficiency activities and renewable energy technologies and resources (energy efficiency, distributed renewables, utility-scale renewables, alternative transportation fuels and modes, and electrical transmission and distribution) in the State of Hawai'i.

283

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-03: Specific Issues on Applicability of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-03: Specific Issues on Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-03: Specific Issues on Applicability of 10 CFR 830 Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-03: Specific Issues on Applicability of 10 CFR 830 Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedure entitled Enforcement of DOE Nuclear Safety Requirements under Price-Anderson Amendments Act of 1988, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity for the Office of Enforcement and Investigation (EHEnforcement) to issue clarifying guidance in a timely manner with respect to the processes used in enforcement activities. This enforcement guidance focuses on several issues related to applicability of 10 CFR 830 that have been observed in enforcement and investigation activities. Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-03: Specific Issues on Applicability of

284

Shall Statements in DOE-STD-1063-2006  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

"Shall" Statements in DOE-STD-1063-2006 "Shall" Statements in DOE-STD-1063-2006 Standard Sect. Respon. Party Shall Statement Action New? Revised? Section from 1063-2000 4.1.1 FEMs Shall Field Element Managers shall ensure that operating contractors apprise Facility Representatives of planning, scheduling, maintenance, operations review, and safety review meetings. 5.2b 4.1.1 FRs Shall A Facility Representative shall be thoroughly familiar with site and facility characteristics, operating procedures, facility authorization bases, operating organizational structure, and key process control personnel. 5.2b 4.1.1 FRs Shall The Facility Representative shall be aware of major work in progress and in planning. 5.2b 4.1.1 FRs Shall The Facility Representative shall know which personnel are controlling the work, what procedures are to be

285

CH Packaging Program Guidance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this document is to provide the technical requirements for preparation for use, operation, inspection, and maintenance of a Transuranic Package Transporter Model II (TRUPACT-II), a HalfPACT shipping package, and directly related components. This document complies with the minimum requirements as specified in the TRUPACT-II Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP), HalfPACT SARP, and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Certificates of Compliance (C of C) 9218 and 9279, respectively. In the event of a conflict between this document and the SARP or C of C, the C of C shall govern. The C of Cs state: "each package must be prepared for shipment and operated in accordance with the procedures described in Chapter 7.0, Operating Procedures, of the application." They further state: "each package must be tested and maintained in accordance with the procedures described in Chapter 8.0, Acceptance Tests and Maintenance Program of the Application." Chapter 9.0 of the SARP charges the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) management and operating (M&O) contractor with assuring packaging is used in accordance with the requirements of the C of C. Because the packaging is NRC-approved, users need to be familiar with Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 71.8. Any time a user suspects or has indications that the conditions of approval in the C of C were not met, the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) shall be notified immediately. The CBFO will evaluate the issue and notify the NRC if required.

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2005-02-28T23:59:59.000Z

286

Diversity Issues Committee - Mission Statement  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Diversity Issues Committee Mission Statement Investigate and study issues relating to diversity in the SUF workforce. Provide recommendations to SUF management to improve the work...

287

DOE/EIS-0238, Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE/EIS-0238, Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for DOE/EIS-0238, Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (1999) DOE/EIS-0238, Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (1999) DOE proposes to continue operating the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) located in Los Alamos County, in north-central New Mexico. DOE has identified and assessed four alternatives for the operation of LANL: (1) No Action, (2) Expanded Operations, (3) Reduced Operations, and (4) Greener. Expanded Operations is DOE's Preferred Alternative, with the exception that DOE would only implement pit manufacturing at a level of 20 pits per year. DOE/EIS-0238, Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (1999)

288

Energy Management Guidance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Guidance Guidance Energy Management Guidance October 8, 2013 - 1:53pm Addthis The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) provides guidance on Federal laws and regulations related to energy management. General Guidance for Facilities Overview of Federal Energy Management Policy and Mandates: Guidance document outlining Federal energy management goals and requirements for Federal energy managers. Sustainability Requirement Crosswalk: Crosswalk of sustainability and energy goals and targets within executive orders and other statutes. Guidelines Establishing Criteria for Excluding Buildings from the Energy Performance Requirements of Section 543 of the National Energy Conservation Policy Act as Amended by the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005): Guidelines that established criteria for exclusions from the energy

289

Safety of magnetic fusion facilities: Volume 2, Guidance  

SciTech Connect

This document provides guidance for the implementation of the requirements identified in Vol. 1 of this Standard. This guidance is intended for the managers, designers, operators, and other personnel with safety responsibilities for facilities designated as magnetic fusion facilities. While Vol. 1 is generally applicable in that requirements there apply to a wide range of fusion facilities, this volume is concerned mainly with large facilities such as the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER). Using a risk-based prioritization, the concepts presented here may also be applied to other magnetic fusion facilities. This volume is oriented toward regulation in the Department of Energy (DOE) environment.

NONE

1995-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

290

Final Guidance on Improving the Process for Preparing Efficient and Timely  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on Improving the Process for Preparing Efficient and on Improving the Process for Preparing Efficient and Timely Environmental Reviews Under the National Environmental Policy Act Final Guidance on Improving the Process for Preparing Efficient and Timely Environmental Reviews Under the National Environmental Policy Act The Council on Environmental Quality is issuing its final guidance on Improving the Process for Preparing Efficient and Timely Environmental Reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and CEQ Regulations implementing NEPA provide numerous techniques for preparing efficient and timely environmental reviews. CEQ is issuing this guidance for Federal departments and agencies to emphasize and clarify that these techniques are available for all NEPA Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements.

291

Guidance Related to Analysis of Impacts to Workers in National Environmental Policy Act Documentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

D D A T E : June 10, 1988 REPLY TO ATTN OF: E H - 2 5 SUBJECT: Guidance Related to Analysis of Impacts to Workers in National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Documentation TO : D I S T R I BUT I ON The purpose of this memorandum is to provide general guidance regarding the analysis of impacts to workers in DOE environmental impact statements (EISs) and environmental assessments (EAs) in order to assist DOE program and field offices in meeting the requirements of NEPA and to establish a general consistency in the Department's NEPA documentation. This guidance was prompted by several questions raised in this regard and was developed by the Office of NEPA Project Assistance, after consultation with the Office of General Counsel. Background Neither the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations for

292

EIS-0377: Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

77: Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement 77: Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0377: Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement Big Stone II Power Plant and Transmission Project In May 2006, Western Area Power Administration (Western), Rural Utilities Service (RUS), and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) issued the Big Stone II Power Plant and Transmission Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Draft EIS, DOE/EIS-0377). The Draft EIS described the details of constructing and operating a nominal 600-megawatt (MW), coal-fired, baseload electric generating facility and associated transmission line and substation upgrades, known as the Big Stone II Project (proposed Project). Western determined that the use of groundwater as the back-up water supply would significantly change the environmental impacts of the proposed

293

EIS-0399: Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Draft Environmental Impact Statement Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0399: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Montana Alberta Tie Ltd. (MATL) 230-kV Transmission Line MATL proposes to construct and operate a merchant 230-kV transmission line between Great Falls, Montana, and Lethbridge, Alberta, that would cross the U.S.-Canada border north of Cut Bank, Montana. The transmission line would transmit 300 megawatts (MW) of electric power south and 300 MW north. EIS-0399-DEIS-Summary-2008.pdf EIS-0399-DEIS-01a-2008.pdf EIS-0399-DEIS-01b-2008.pdf EIS-0399-DEIS-01c-2008.pdf EIS-0399-DEIS-01d-2008.pdf EIS-0399-DEIS-01e-2008.pdf EIS-0399-DEIS-02-2008.pdf More Documents & Publications EIS-0399: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0399-SA-01: Supplement Analysis Management Alert: OAS-RA-12-01

294

Environmental Impact Statements and Environmental Assessments Status Chart  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 28, 2010 May 28, 2010 EIS-0419: EPA Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Whistling Ridge Energy Project, Construction and Operation of a 75-megawatt Wind Turbine Facility, City of White Salmon, Skamania County, WA May 13, 2010 EA-1707: Draft Environmental Assessment Closure of Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill and Solid Waste Landfill, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington April 9, 2010 EIS-0404: EPA Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement Los Vaqueros Reservoir Expansion Project, California April 9, 2010 EIS-0455: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Genesis Solar Energy Project, Riverside County, CA April 9, 2010 EIS-0455: EPA Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Genesis Solar Energy Project, Riverside County, CA

295

Secretary Chu Statement on AP1000 Reactor Design Certification | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Secretary Chu Statement on AP1000 Reactor Design Certification Secretary Chu Statement on AP1000 Reactor Design Certification Secretary Chu Statement on AP1000 Reactor Design Certification December 22, 2011 - 3:25pm Addthis Washington, D.C. - U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu issued the following statement today in support of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) decision to certify Westinghouse Electric's AP1000 nuclear reactor design, a significant step towards constructing a new generation of U.S. nuclear reactors. In February 2010, the Obama Administration announced the offer of a conditional commitment for a $8.33 billion loan guarantee for the construction and operation of two AP1000 reactors at Alvin W. Vogtle Electric Generation Plant in Burke, Georgia. "The Administration and the Energy Department are committed to restarting

296

EIS-0382: Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Draft Environmental Impact Statement Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0382: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Mesaba Energy Project, Itasca, MN This Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) provides information about the potential environmental impacts of the proposed Mesaba Energy Project, a coal-based Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) electric power generating facility that would be located in the Taconite Tax Relief Area (TTRA) of northeastern Minnesota. Excelsior Energy Inc. (Excelsior) proposes to design, construct, and operate the Mesaba Energy Project in two phases; each phase would nominally generate 606 megawatts of electricity (MWe) for export to the electrical grid, 1,212 MWe total. DOE's Proposed Action is to provide a total of $36 million in co-funding, through a

297

EIS-0362: Notice of Cancellation of the Environmental Impact Statement |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2: Notice of Cancellation of the Environmental Impact 2: Notice of Cancellation of the Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0362: Notice of Cancellation of the Environmental Impact Statement Colorado Springs Utilities Next-Generation CFB Coal Generating Unit, Fountain, Colorado The Department of Energy (DOE) is canceling the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a proposal by Colorado Springs Utilities (CSU) to design, construct, and operate a project known as the Next- Generation Circulating Fluidized Bed (CFB) Coal Generating Unit near Fountain, El Paso County, Colorado. DOE/EIS-0362, Department of Energy, Notice of Cancellation of the Environmental Impact Statement for the Colorado Springs Utilities Next-Generation CFB Coal Generating Unit, Fountain, Colorado, 69 FR 62440, (October 2004)

298

EIS-0448: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Environmental Impact Statement Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0448: Final Environmental Impact Statement Desert Sunlight Solar Farm Project, California This Plan Amendment/Final Environmental Impact Statement (PA/FEIS) addresses the possible United States Bureau of Land Management (BLM) approval of an amendment to the California Desert Conservation Area Plan (CDCA Plan) to allow for solar energy and of a right-of-way (ROW) grant to lease land managed by the BLM for construction, operation and decommissioning of a solar photovoltaic energy generation facility. The Agency Preferred Alternative covers approximately 4,176 acres (ac), managed by the BLM, and would generate 550 megawatts (MW) of electricity annually. The PA/FEIS identifies impacts of the Agency Preferred Alternative,

299

Environmental Impact Statements and Environmental Assessments Status Chart  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Impact Statements and Environmental Assessments Environmental Impact Statements and Environmental Assessments Status Chart Environmental Impact Statements and Environmental Assessments Status Chart This chart represents anticipated activity and is not a commitment for documentation or dates. October 21, 2011 EIS-0426: Notice of Extension of Public Comment Period for the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement Continued Operation of the Nevada National Security Site and Off-Site Locations in the State of Nevada September 26, 2011 EA-1792: Finding of No Significant Impact University of Maine's Deepwater Offshore Floating Wind Turbine Testing and Demonstration Project, Gulf of Maine September 26, 2011 EA-1792: Final Environmental Assessment University of Maine's DeepWater Offshore Floating Wind Turbine Testing and

300

EIS-0464: Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Draft Environmental Impact Statement Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0464: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Lake Charles Carbon Capture and Sequestration Project, Lake Charles, Louisiana and Brazoria County, Texas This draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) provides information about the potential environmental impacts associated with the Department of Energy's (DOE's) proposed action to provide financial assistance to Leucadia Energy, LLC (Leucadia) and with Leucadia's proposed Lake Charles Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) project. DOE's proposed action would provide financial assistance to Leucadia under the Industrial Carbon Capture and Sequestration (ICCS) Program to support construction and operation of Leucadia's Lake Charles CCS project. DOE proposes to provide Leucadia with up to $261.4 million, which would constitute about 60

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "guidance statement operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

EIS-0282: Notice of Cancellation of the Environmental Impact Statement |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2: Notice of Cancellation of the Environmental Impact 2: Notice of Cancellation of the Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0282: Notice of Cancellation of the Environmental Impact Statement McIntosh Unit 4 Pressurized Circulating Fluidized Bed Demonstration Project The Department of Energy (DOE) is canceling the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a proposal by the City of Lakeland to design, construct, and operate a project known as the McIntosh Unit 4 Pressurized Circulating Fluidized Bed Demonstration Project in Lakeland, Florida. DOE selected the City of Lakeland's proposal for further consideration under DOE's Clean Coal Technology Demonstration Program competitive solicitation. DOE/EIS-0202, Notice of Cancellation of the Environmental Impact Statement for the McIntosh Unit 4 Pressurized Circulating Fluidized Bed Demonstration

302

EIS-0340: Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Draft Environmental Impact Statement Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0340: Draft Environmental Impact Statement NE Oregon Hatchery Program: Grande Ronde Imnaha Spring Chinook Project To assist in the conservation and recovery of Chinook salmon native to the Grande Ronde River and Imnaha River subbasins, the Proposed Action of updating and modifying two existing hatcheries and constructing three new hatchery facilities at other sites is being studied in this Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Draft EIS). BPA proposes to fund the capital improvements and the operation and maintenance of all five facilities to aid BPA's efforts to mitigate and recover anadromous fish affected by the Federal Columbia River Power System. The Lower Snake River run of spring/summer chinook was listed as threatened under the Endangered

303

EIS-0250-S2: Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0250-S2: Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada The Nevada Rail Corridor SEIS (DOE/EIS-0250F-S2) analyzes the potential impacts of constructing and operating a railroad to connect the Yucca Mountain repository site to an existing rail line near Wabuska, Nevada (in the Mina rail corridor). The Nevada Rail Corridor SEIS analyzes the Mina rail corridor at a level of detail commensurate with that of the rail corridors analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada (DOE/EIS-0250F).

304

Submitting Environmental Impact Statements | Compliance and Enforcement | US EPA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Submitting Environmental Impact Statements | Compliance and Enforcement | US EPA Submitting Environmental Impact Statements | Compliance and Enforcement | US EPA Jump to main content. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Recent Additions | Contact Us Search: All EPA Compliance and Enforcement q You are here: EPA Home q Compliance and Enforcement q National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) q Submitting Environmental Impact Statements Submitting Environmental Impact Statements q Amended EIS Filing System Guidelines (January 2011) q Where to Submit (or "File") an EIS q Filing an EIS--Draft, Final and Supplemental q EIS Filing Procedure for Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP) Events q Notice in the Federal Register q Time Periods Amended EIS Filing System Guidelines (January 2011)

305

EIS-0382: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EIS-0382: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0382: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0382: Final Environmental Impact Statement Mesaba Energy Project, Itasca, MN This Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) provides information about the potential environmental impacts of the proposed Mesaba Energy Project, a coal-based Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) electric power generating facility that would be located in the Taconite Tax Relief Area (TTRA) of northeastern Minnesota. Excelsior Energy Inc. (Excelsior) proposes to design, construct, and operate the Mesaba Energy Project in two phases; each phase would nominally generate 600 megawatts of electricity (MWe) for export to the electrical grid, 1,200 MWe total. DOE's Proposed Action is to provide a total of $36 million in co-funding, through a

306

EIS-0427: Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Draft Environmental Impact Statement Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0427: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Interconnection of the Grapevine Canyon Wind Project, Coconino County, Arizona The Grapevine Canyon Wind Project, proposed by Foresight Flying M, LLC, would include: 1) a wind energy generating facility up to 500 megawatts; 2) a 345- kilovolt (kV) electrical transmission tie-line; and 3) a 345-kV electrical interconnection switchyard that would be owned and operated by Western. The wind energy generating facility would be located on private land and trust land administered by the Arizona State Land Department. The document was distributed in two volumes. DOE/EIS-0427: Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Grapevine Canyon Project (July 2010) Volume 1 EIS-0427-DEIS-02-2010.pdf

307

EIS-0455: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Environmental Impact Statement Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0455: Final Environmental Impact Statement Genesis Solar Energy Project, Riverside County, CA The BLM's purpose and need for the GSEP is to respond to Genesis Solar, LLC's application under Title V of FLPMA (43 U.S.C. 1761) for a ROW grant to construct, operate, maintain and decommission a solar thermal facility on public lands in compliance with FLPMA, BLM ROW regulations, and other applicable Federal laws. The BLM will decide whether to approve, approve with modification, or deny issuance of a ROW grant to Genesis Solar, LLC for the proposed GSEP. Bureau of Land Management Plan Amendment/Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Genesis Solar Energy Project Volume 1, DOE/EIS-0455 (August 2010) EIS-0455-FEIS-02-2010.pdf

308

EIS-0418: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Environmental Impact Statement Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0418: Final Environmental Impact Statement South Dakota PrairieWinds Project PrairieWinds, SD1, Incorporated (PrairieWinds) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Basin Electric Power Cooperative (Basin Electric). PrairieWinds proposes to construct, own, operate, and maintain the South Dakota PrairieWinds Project, a 151.5-megawatt (MW) nameplate capacity wind powered generation facility, including 101 General Electric 1.5-MW wind turbine generators, electrical collector lines, collector substation, transmission line, communications system, and wind turbine service access roads. Final Environmental Impact Statement for the South Dakota PrairieWinds Project, DOE/EIS-0418 (July 2010) EIS-0418-FEIS-02-2010.pdf More Documents & Publications

309

EIS-0023: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

023: Final Environmental Impact Statement 023: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0023: Final Environmental Impact Statement Long-Term Management of Defense High-Level Radioactive Wastes (Research and Development Program for Immobilization) Savannah River Plant, Aiken, South Carolina This EIS analyzes the potential environmental implications of the proposed continuation of a large Federal research and development (R&D) program directed toward the immobilization of the high-level radioactive wastes resulting from chemical separations operations for defense radionuclides production at the DOE Savannah River Plant (SRP) near Aiken, South Carolina. EIS-0023-FEIS-1979.pdf EIS-0023-FEIS-Figures-1979.pdf EIS-0023-FEIS-Tables-1979.pdf More Documents & Publications EIS-0062: Final Environmental Impact Statement

310

EIS-0357: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Environmental Impact Statement Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0357: Final Environmental Impact Statement Gilberton Coal-to-Clean Fuels and Power Project, Gilberton, Pennsylvania This Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) assesses the potential environmental impacts that would result from a proposed Department of Energy (DOE) action to provide cost-shared funding for construction and operation of facilities near Gilberton, Pennsylvania, which have been proposed by WMPI PTY, LLC, for producing electricity, steam, and liquid fuels from anthracite coal waste (culm). The project has been selected by DOE under the Clean Coal Power Initiative (CCPI) to demonstrate the integration of coal waste gasification and Fischer-Tropsch (F-T) synthesis of liquid hydrocarbon fuels at commercial scale.

311

EIS-0344: Draft Envrionmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4: Draft Envrionmental Impact Statement 4: Draft Envrionmental Impact Statement EIS-0344: Draft Envrionmental Impact Statement Grand Coulee - Bell 500-kV Transmission Line Project This Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) discloses the potential impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed Grand Coulee-Bell 500-kV Transmission Line Project. Bonnewille Power Administration (BPA) would construct a new 500-kilovolt (kV) transmission line that would replace a single-circuit 115-kV transmission line in an exisiting corridor that has multiple transmission lines for most of the project's length. The transmission line would extend between the Grand Coulee 600-kV Switchyard and Bell Substation near Spokane, a distance of 84 miles. Detailed information about the project and its environmental impacts

312

EIS-0448: Notice of Adoption of an Environmental Impact Statement |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notice of Adoption of an Environmental Impact Statement Notice of Adoption of an Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0448: Notice of Adoption of an Environmental Impact Statement First Solar Desert Sunlight Solar Farm Project Notice of Adoption by the Department of Energy from the Environmental Protection Agency: First Solar Desert Sunlight Solar Farm (DSSF) Project, proposes to develop a 550-megawatt photovoltaic solar project and proposes to facilitate the construction and operation of the Red Bluff Substation, California Desert Conservation Area (CDCA) Plan, Riverside County, California. Notice of Adoption First Solar Desert Sunlight Solar Farm (DSSF) Project, DOE/EIS-0448 (June 2011 - 76 FR 37111) More Documents & Publications EIS-0425: EPA Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement

313

EIS-0377: Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0377: Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement Big Stone II Power Plant and Transmission Project In May 2006, Western Area Power Administration (Western), Rural Utilities Service (RUS), and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) issued the Big Stone II Power Plant and Transmission Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Draft EIS, DOE/EIS-0377). The Draft EIS described the details of constructing and operating a nominal 600-megawatt (MW), coal-fired, baseload electric generating facility and associated transmission line and substation upgrades, known as the Big Stone II Project (proposed Project). Western determined that the use of groundwater as the back-up water supply would significantly change the environmental impacts of the proposed

314

EIS-0449: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

49: Final Environmental Impact Statement 49: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0449: Final Environmental Impact Statement Blythe Solar Power Project This Plan Amendment/Final Environmental Impact Statement (PA/FEIS) addresses the possible United States Bureau of Land Management (BLM) approval of an amendment to the California Desert Conservation Area Plan (CDCA Plan) to allow for solar energy and of a right-of-way (ROW) grant to lease land managed by the BLM for construction, operation and decommissioning of a solar electricity generation facility. The Agency Preferred Alternative covers approximately 7,025 acres (ac), managed by the BLM, and would generate 1000 megawatts (MW) of electricity annually. The PA/FEIS identifies impacts of the Agency Preferred Alternative, including impacts related to biological resources,

315

EIS-0448: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

48: Final Environmental Impact Statement 48: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0448: Final Environmental Impact Statement Desert Sunlight Solar Farm Project, California This Plan Amendment/Final Environmental Impact Statement (PA/FEIS) addresses the possible United States Bureau of Land Management (BLM) approval of an amendment to the California Desert Conservation Area Plan (CDCA Plan) to allow for solar energy and of a right-of-way (ROW) grant to lease land managed by the BLM for construction, operation and decommissioning of a solar photovoltaic energy generation facility. The Agency Preferred Alternative covers approximately 4,176 acres (ac), managed by the BLM, and would generate 550 megawatts (MW) of electricity annually. The PA/FEIS identifies impacts of the Agency Preferred Alternative,

316

DOE Environmental Impact Statement Public Scoping Meeting on Champlain  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Environmental Impact Statement Public Scoping Meeting on DOE Environmental Impact Statement Public Scoping Meeting on Champlain Hudson Power Express Transmission Line Project DOE Environmental Impact Statement Public Scoping Meeting on Champlain Hudson Power Express Transmission Line Project June 30, 2010 - 3:28pm Addthis Washington, D.C. --The Department of Energy (DOE) is hosting seven meetings for public participation as part of its Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) preparation process pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to assess the potential environmental impacts from its proposed action of granting a Presidential permit to Champlain Hudson Power Express, Inc., to construct, operate, maintain, and connect a new electric transmission line across the U.S.- Canada border in northeastern New York.

317

EIS-0357: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

57: Final Environmental Impact Statement 57: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0357: Final Environmental Impact Statement Gilberton Coal-to-Clean Fuels and Power Project, Gilberton, Pennsylvania This Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) assesses the potential environmental impacts that would result from a proposed Department of Energy (DOE) action to provide cost-shared funding for construction and operation of facilities near Gilberton, Pennsylvania, which have been proposed by WMPI PTY, LLC, for producing electricity, steam, and liquid fuels from anthracite coal waste (culm). The project has been selected by DOE under the Clean Coal Power Initiative (CCPI) to demonstrate the integration of coal waste gasification and Fischer-Tropsch (F-T) synthesis of liquid hydrocarbon fuels at commercial scale.

318

EIS-0464: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Environmental Impact Statement Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0464: Final Environmental Impact Statement Lake Charles Carbon capture and Sequestration Project, Lake Charles, Louisiana and Brazoria County, Texas This Final Environmental Impact Statement provides information about the potential environmental impacts associated with the Department of Energy's proposed action to provide financial assistance to Leucadia Energy, LLC (Leucadia) and with Leucadia's proposed Lake Charles Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) project. DOE's proposed action would provide financial assistance to Leucadia under the Industrial Carbon Capture Sequestration Program to support construction and operation of Leucadia's Lake Charles CCS project. DOE proposes to provide Leucadia with up to $261.4 million, which would constitute about 60 percent of the

319

EIS-0354: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4: Final Environmental Impact Statement 4: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0354: Final Environmental Impact Statement Ivanpah Energy Center Ivanpah Energy Center, L.P., a Diamond Generating Corporation Company, a subsidiary of Mitsubishi Corporation proposes to construct and operate a 500 Megawatt (MW) gasfired electric power generating station in southern Clark County, Nevada. The facility would be known as the Ivanpah Energy Center, LP (IEC). The Environmental Impact Statement evaluates several potential plant sites, two of which were determined to be reasonable alternatives for development. Construction at either site would require consideration of a natural gas supply pipeline, access roads, process water availability and conveyance, telecommunications, and electrical transmission interconnections to the southern Nevada power grid. The

320

EIS-0250-S2: Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0250-S2: Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain-Nevada Rail Transportation Corridor The Nevada Rail Corridor SEIS (DOE/EIS-0250F-S2D) analyzes the potential impacts of constructing and operating a railroad to connect the Yucca Mountain repository site to an existing rail line near Wabuska, Nevada (in the Mina rail corridor). The Nevada Rail Corridor SEIS analyzes the Mina rail corridor at a level of detail commensurate with that of the rail corridors analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "guidance statement operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

EIS-0337: Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Draft Environmental Impact Statement Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0337: Draft Environmental Impact Statement West Valley Demonstration Project Waste Management The purpose of the Draft West Valley Demonstration Project Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement is to provide information on the environmental impacts of the Department of Energy's proposed action to ship radioactive wastes that are either currently in storage, or that will be generated from operations over the next 10 years, to offsite disposal locations, and to continue its ongoing onsite waste management activities. Decommissioning or long-term stewardship decisions will be reached based on a separate EIS that is being prepared for that decisionmaking. This EIS evaluates the environmental consequences that may result from actions to

322

EIS-0337: Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7: Draft Environmental Impact Statement 7: Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0337: Draft Environmental Impact Statement West Valley Demonstration Project Waste Management The purpose of the Draft West Valley Demonstration Project Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement is to provide information on the environmental impacts of the Department of Energy's proposed action to ship radioactive wastes that are either currently in storage, or that will be generated from operations over the next 10 years, to offsite disposal locations, and to continue its ongoing onsite waste management activities. Decommissioning or long-term stewardship decisions will be reached based on a separate EIS that is being prepared for that decisionmaking. This EIS evaluates the environmental consequences that may result from actions to

323

DOE Indian Energy Purchase Preference Policy Guidance | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Indian Energy Purchase Preference Policy Guidance DOE Indian Energy Purchase Preference Policy Guidance PDFFINAL DOE Indian Energy purchase preference policy guidance.pdf More...

324

2012 Federal Real Property Council Reporting Guidance | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Guidance 2012 Federal Real Property Council Reporting Guidance FRPP 2012 Data Dictionary FINAL.pdf More Documents & Publications FRPC User Guidance -for FY2006 FRPC User...

325

Asset Utilization Index (AUI) Guidance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Asset Utilization Index (AUI) Guidance Asset Utilization Index (AUI) Guidance AUI Guidance090227.pdf More Documents & Publications Guiding Principles of Real Property Asset...

326

Smart Grid Grant Program Recipient Reporting Guidance, Updated...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Smart Grid Grant Program Recipient Reporting Guidance, Updated Smart Grid Grant Program Recipient Reporting Guidance, Updated Reporting guidance for the Smart Grid Investment Grant...

327

Insights on radiological risks of US Department of Energy radioactive waste management alternatives in the Environmental Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement  

SciTech Connect

A Facility Accident Analysis (1) was performed in support of the US Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management (EM) Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS). It used an integrated risk-based approach (2) to allow risk comparisons of EM PEIS strategies for consolidating the storage and treatment of wastes at different DOE sites throughout the country. This approach was developed in accordance with the latest National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) compliance guidance from DOE (3), which calls for consideration of a spectrum of accident scenarios that could occur in implementing the various actions evaluated in the EM PEIS. This paper discusses our insights with respect to the likely importance of the relative treatment technologies, waste management facilities and operations, and waste consolidation strategies considered in the EM PEIS.

Mueller, C.

1994-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

328

DOE Waste Treatability Group Guidance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This guidance presents a method and definitions for aggregating U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) waste into streams and treatability groups based on characteristic parameters that influence waste management technology needs. Adaptable to all DOE waste types (i.e., radioactive waste, hazardous waste, mixed waste, sanitary waste), the guidance establishes categories and definitions that reflect variations within the radiological, matrix (e.g., bulk physical/chemical form), and regulated contaminant characteristics of DOE waste. Beginning at the waste container level, the guidance presents a logical approach to implementing the characteristic parameter categories as part of the basis for defining waste streams and as the sole basis for assigning streams to treatability groups. Implementation of this guidance at each DOE site will facilitate the development of technically defined, site-specific waste stream data sets to support waste management planning and reporting activities. Consistent implementation at all of the sites will enable aggregation of the site-specific waste stream data sets into comparable national data sets to support these activities at a DOE complex-wide level.

Kirkpatrick, T.D.

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

329

Federal Energy Efficiency Acquisition Guidance and Requirements for  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Heat Pump Water Heaters Heat Pump Water Heaters Federal Energy Efficiency Acquisition Guidance and Requirements for Residential Heat Pump Water Heaters October 30, 2013 - 9:50am Addthis Did You Know? Heat pump water heaters are the most efficient electric water heaters available, saving 50% to 60% over standard products. FEMP provides acquisition guidance and Federal efficiency requirements across a variety of product categories, including residential heat pump water heaters, which are an ENERGY STAR®-qualified product category. Federal laws and executive orders mandate that agencies meet these efficiency requirements in all procurement and acquisition actions that are not specifically exempted by law. The following guidance and requirements apply to residential heat pump water heaters that operate on 250 volts or less, have a current rating of

330

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 99-02: DOE Enforcement Activities of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

99-02: DOE Enforcement Activities 99-02: DOE Enforcement Activities of Internal Dosimetry Program Requirements Enforcement Guidance Supplement 99-02: DOE Enforcement Activities of Internal Dosimetry Program Requirements Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedure entitled Enforcement of DOE Nuclear Safety Requirements under Price-Anderson Amendments Act of 1988, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity for the Office of Enforcement and Investigation (EH Enforcement) to issue clarifying guidance in a timely manner with respect to the processes used in its enforcement activities. The focus of this enforcement guidance clarifies internal dosimetry program requirements identified by the Department of Energy's nuclear safety requirements in 10 CFR 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection Programs) and 10 CFR 830.120

331

SUBJECT: Guidance on Retention of Facility Representative Technical  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SUBJECT: Guidance on Retention of Facility Representative Technical SUBJECT: Guidance on Retention of Facility Representative Technical Competence during Reductions in Force, 4/21/1998 SUBJECT: Guidance on Retention of Facility Representative Technical Competence during Reductions in Force, 4/21/1998 The Department's Revised Implementation Plan (IP) for Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 93-3 renews the Department's commitment to maintaining the technical capability necessary to safely manage and operate defense nuclear facilities. Retaining highly qualified employees in critical technical skills areas is vital to the maintenance of these technical capabilities. The Department has therefore committed in the revised R? to the development of a model that offices can use to proactively manage and preserve critical technical capabilities. During the

332

Nuclear Maintenance Applications Center: Maintenance Work Package Planning Guidance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The work management process is one of the core business processes outlined within the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Standard Nuclear Performance Model for operation and maintenance of nuclear power plants. The preparation of work packages is a key element of this overall process. The purpose of this report is to provide guidance to power plant personnel regarding work package quality as a supplement to Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) AP-928, Work Management Process Description. The ...

2013-09-10T23:59:59.000Z

333

EIS-0359: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Environmental Impact Statement Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0359: Final Environmental Impact Statement Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Paducah, Kentucky, Site The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) proposes, via a contract awarded at the direction of Congress (Public Law 107-206), to design, construct, and operate two conversion facilities for converting depleted uranium hexafluoride (commonly referred to as DUF6): one at Portsmouth, Ohio, and one at Paducah, Kentucky. DOE intends to use the proposed facilities to convert its inventory of DUF6 to a more stable chemical form suitable for beneficial use or disposal. This site-specific EIS considers the construction, operation, maintenance, and decontamination and decommissioning (D&D) of the proposed DUF6 conversion facility at three

334

EIS-0271: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Environmental Impact Statement Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0271: Final Environmental Impact Statement Construction and Operation of a Tritium Extraction Facility at the Savannah Siver Site DOE proposes to construct and operate a Tritium Extraction Facility (TEF) at H Area on the Savannah River Site (SRS) to provide the capability to extract tritium from commercial light water reactor (CLWR) targets and from targets of similar design. The proposed action is also DOE's preferred alternative. An action alternative is to construct and operate TEF at the Allied General Nuclear Services facility, which is adjacent to the eastern side of the SRS. Under the no-action alternative DOE could incorporate tritium extraction capabilities in the accelerator for production of tritium. This EIS is linked to the Final Programmatic Environmental Impact

335

EIS-0360: Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Draft Environmental Impact Statement Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0360: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Portsmouth, Ohio, Site The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) proposes, via a contract awarded at the direction of Congress (Public Law 107-206), to design, construct, and operate two conversion facilities for converting depleted uranium hexafluoride (commonly referred to as DUF6): one at Portsmouth, Ohio, and one at Paducah, Kentucky. DOE intends to use the proposed facilities to convert its inventory of DUF6 to a more stable chemical form suitable for beneficial use or disposal. This site-specific EIS analyzes the construction, operation, maintenance, and decontamination and decommissioning (D&D) of the proposed DUF6 conversion facility at three

336

EIS-0271: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1: Final Environmental Impact Statement 1: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0271: Final Environmental Impact Statement Construction and Operation of a Tritium Extraction Facility at the Savannah Siver Site DOE proposes to construct and operate a Tritium Extraction Facility (TEF) at H Area on the Savannah River Site (SRS) to provide the capability to extract tritium from commercial light water reactor (CLWR) targets and from targets of similar design. The proposed action is also DOE's preferred alternative. An action alternative is to construct and operate TEF at the Allied General Nuclear Services facility, which is adjacent to the eastern side of the SRS. Under the no-action alternative DOE could incorporate tritium extraction capabilities in the accelerator for production of tritium. This EIS is linked to the Final Programmatic Environmental Impact

337

Communications and Guidance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Guidance and Guidance Communications and Guidance Issued Guidance: Throughout the life of the Recovery Act, it has at times been necessary to issue guidance around certain policies or procedures. DOE Interim Guidance on Recipient Signage (May 2010) Buy American Act Guidance Davis-Bacon Compliance Guidance on Recovery Act Logo Usage (March 2009) Recovery Act Memos: Special reports written on cross-cutting themes of Recovery Act impact. Small Businesses Helping Drive Economy: Clean Energy, Clean Sites (March 2010) Transforming America's Transportation Sector: Batteries and Electric Vehicles (pdf) (July 2010) Help with Federal Reporting.gov: Recovery Act recipients are required to report to FederalReporting.gov once every quarter. While the process can be complicated, here you will find a DOE specific guide through the process.

338

Hybrid vehicle-centric route guidance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This thesis proposes a hybrid route guidance system in which predictive guidance is generated in a centralized layer and revised in a reactive, decentralized layer that resides on-board the vehicle. This hybrid approach ...

Farver, Jennifer M. (Jennifer Margaret), 1976-

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

339

Guidance on measuring and reporting Greenhouse Gas  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Guidance on measuring and reporting Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions from freight transport This guidance provides clear instructions on calculating the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from freight and report your greenhouse gas emissions', by providing more specific information and examples relating

340

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-04, Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.23 and Compliance Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR Subpart C  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enforcement Guidance Supplement Enforcement Guidance Supplement EGS: 00-04 Appendix E- Operational Procedures for Enforcement Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 October 26, 2000 MEMORANDUM FOR: DOE PAAA COORDINATORS CONTRACTOR PAAA COORDINATORS FROM: R. KEITH CHRISTOPHER DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND INVESTIGATION SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-04: Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "guidance statement operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

EIS-0269: Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

69: Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0269: Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement The Department of Energy (DOE) limits electronic access to certain...

342

Technical Standards, Program Project Justification Statement...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Project Justification Statement - August 29, 2012 Technical Standards, Program Project Justification Statement - August 29, 2012 August 29, 2012 DOE Technical Standards Program...

343

DOE Prepares Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

You are here Home DOE Prepares Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Uranium Leasing Program DOE Prepares Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the...

344

U.S.-Japan Joint Statement  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Release August 7, 2003 2003817 STATEMENT BY PHILIP T. REEKER, DEPUTY SPOKESMAN Joint Statement of The United States and Japan on High-Level Consultations on Climate Change...

345

EIS-0161: Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

61: Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0161: Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement The Department of Energy (DOE) limits electronic access to certain...

346

Equal Employment Opportunity and Diversity Policy Statement ...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Equal Employment Opportunity and Diversity Policy Statement Equal Employment Opportunity and Diversity Policy Statement Memorandum on DOE's Policy to abide by EEO and Diversity...

347

California Energy Commission GUIDANCE ON WASTE  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission GUIDANCE GUIDANCE ON WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANS FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of the information in this report. #12;GUIDANCE ON WASTE MANAGEMENT) obtain waste management plans for each proposed project receiving funding under the Energy Efficiency

348

Final Environmental Impact Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6E/EIS-0096-F . Ji^ ' 6E/EIS-0096-F . Ji^ ' w V' - > DOE/EIS--00 96-F-Vol.1 //C^ DE84 0 0 1 4 4 6 Final Environmental Impact Statement Remedial Actions at the Former Vitro Rare Metals Plant Site, Canonsburg, Washington County, Pennsylvania United States Department of Energy July 1983 Volume I r NOTICE } IPORTIONS OF THIS REPORT ARE ILLEGIBLE.' / It has been reproduced from the besi ' available copy to permit the broadest possible availability. This document is PUBLICLY RELEASABLl Authorizmg OfFtciai Date: Z P l ^ o " ? isTWBUTim ef T H I S m\jM] IS mm\m DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency Thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal

349

STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 2000 10:48 FR IPL DOE CH 630 252 2779 TO GCP-HQ P.02/04 8 2000 10:48 FR IPL DOE CH 630 252 2779 TO GCP-HQ P.02/04 * * STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS Request by Siemens Westinghouse Power Corp. for an Advance Waiver of Domestic and Foreign Invention Rights under DOE Cooperative Agreement No. DE-AC26- 99FT40674; W(A)-00-002, CH-1023 The Petitioner, Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation (Siemens) , was awarded this cooperative agreement for the performance of work entitled, "Novel Gas Cleaning/Conditioning for Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC)'. Under the cooperative agreement, Siemens is to produce the ground-work test data and process evaluations for the development of a new gas cleaning process, the "Ultra-clean" fuel gas cleanup process for carbonaceous feed stock based fuel gases/syngases. This new gas cleaning process will satisfy the demands of future environmental

350

STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

IPR":15-2008 09:22 From: IPR":15-2008 09:22 From: To: 912025862805 P.2/5 STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS REQUEST BY HUNTSMAN ADVANCED MATERIALS AMERICAS, INC. (HUNTSMAN) FOR AN ADVANCE WAIVER OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN PATENT RlGI-iTS UNDER DOE GRANT NO. DE-FG36-07G017012~ W(A)-08-004 The Petitioner, Huntsman, has requested a waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights for all subject inventions arising from its participation under the ahove referenced grant entitled "Next Generation "Bipolar Plates for Automotive PEM Fuel Cells." The Petitioner will be collaborating with GraiTech International, Ltd., Ballard Power Systems ("Ballard"), and Case Westem Reserve University. Ballard is subject to this waiver request. GrafTeeh is the prime awardee under the grant, with Ballard and Huntsman as sub-

351

SUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR THE  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

| U.S. Department of Energy | U.S. Department of Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Form OE-417|ELECTRIC EMERGENCY INCIDENT AND DISTURBANCE REPORT|Form Approved OMB No. 1901-0288 Approval Expires 01/31/15 Burden Per Response: 2.03 hours| |NOTICE: This report is mandatory under Public Law 93-275. Failure to comply may result in criminal fines, civil penalties and other sanctions as provided by law. For the sanctions and the provisions concerning the confidentiality of information submitted on this form, see General Information portion of the instructions. Title 18 USC 1001 makes it a criminal offense for any person knowingly and willingly to make to any Agency or Department of the United States any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements as to any matter within

352

SUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR THE  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Form OE-417 ELECTRIC EMERGENCY INCIDENT AND DISTURBANCE REPORT Form Approved OMB No. 1901-0288 Approval Expires 01/31/15 Burden Per Response: 2.03 hours NOTICE: This report is mandatory under Public Law 93-275. Failure to comply may result in criminal fines, civil penalties and other sanctions as provided by law. For the sanctions and the provisions concerning the confidentiality of information submitted on this form, see General Information portion of the instructions. Title 18 USC 1001 makes it a criminal offense for any person knowingly and willingly to make to any Agency or Department of the United States any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements as to any matter within its jurisdiction.

353

STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Further, Petitioner Further, Petitioner Sandia National Laboratories and Los Alamos National Laboratory are also leaders inbiumass enzyme research and have b¢cn recosnized, and have and to be funded by DOE for their biomass enzyme research. AU organiZi'ltions have good depth in technical, business, and management skills that are assembled to deliver performance and carry outthe proposed project successfully, waiver shall be subject to the m:arch-inand preference for 8.'5 the U.S. Government license, as set forth in35 U.s.C. 202· to the u.s. competitiveness provisions as attached to this Statement. In brief, Petitioner has agreed that products embodying intellectual property developed under this agreement shall be substantially manufactufed in the United States. and that

354

Draft Environmental Impact Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for the Searchlight Wind Energy Project NVN-084626 and NVN-086777 DES 11-52 Bureau of Land Management Las Vegas Field Office in cooperation with Western Area Power Administration National Park Service January 2012 BLM Mission Statement It is the mission of the Bureau of Land Management to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. Under Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Department of the Interior must insure that electronic and information technology allows individuals with disabilities (Federal employees and members of the public) access to and use of information and data that is comparable to individuals without disabilities. If you would like an electronic copy of this document that meets 508 compliance

355

STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS Request by Cummins Engine Company, Inc. for an Advance Waiver of Domestic and Foreign Invention Rights under DOE Cooperative Agreement No. DE-FC26- 05NT42418; W(A)-06-003, CH-1351 The Petitioner, Cummins Engine Company, Inc. (Cummins) was awarded this cooperative agreement for the performance of work entitled, "Low-Temperature Combustion Using Pre-Mixed Charge Compression Ignition". The goal of this program is to develop advanced combustion technologies demonstrating a 10% reduction in fuel consumption while meeting 2010 emission levels. Cummins will be evaluating pre-mix charged, compression ignition (PCCI) in-cylinder combustion and subsystem technologies. The anticipated subsystems requiring performance enhancements to achieve the goals of this program include: fuel delivery; power cylinder;

356

STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

APR. -17'97(THU) 14 :38 IPL DOE H APR. -17'97(THU) 14 :38 IPL DOE H TEL:I 630 252 2779 P. 02 ( e STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS Request by Foster Wheeler Development Corporation for an Advance Waiver of Domestic and Foreign Invention Rights under DOE Cooperative agreement No. - DE-AC22-95PC95143; W(A)-97-004, CH-0917 The Petitioner, Foster Wheeler Development Corporation (FWDC), was awarded this cooperative agreement under the High Performance Power Systems (HIPPS) program. This project is for the development of a coal-fired combined cycle power generating plant that will have efficiency in excess of 47 percent. The scope of work includes engineering analysis, laboratory testing, pilot plant testing and the proposal level design of a prototype commercial plant. The Petitioner was one of two proposers selected as a result of its response to the PRDA

357

OMB Burden Disclosure Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

71.1 OMB Control Number 71.1 OMB Control Number (09/2012) (Classification) OMB Burden Disclosure Statement 1910-1800 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 10 (minutes) per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching exist ing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comme nts regarding this estimate or any other aspect of this information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Information, Records, and Resource Management, MA-41-GTN, Paperwork Reduction Project (1910-1800), U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC 20874-1290; and to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Paperwork Reduction Project (1910-1800),Washington, DC 20503.

358

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 02-01, Enforcement Position Relative to 10 CFR 835 Bioassy Accreditation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enforcement Guidance Supplement EGS: 02-01 Appendix E- Operational Procedures for Enforcement Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 February 21, 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR: DOE PAAA COORDINATORS CONTRACTOR PAAA COORDINATORS FROM: R. KEITH CHRISTOPHER DIRECTOR OFFICE OF PRICE-ANDERSON ENFORCEMENT SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 02-01: Enforcement Position Relative to 10 CFR 835 Bioassay Accreditation Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedures for Enforcement, published in June 1998,

359

Beryllium-Associated Worker Registry Data Collection and Management Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 June 2007 DOE TECHNICAL STANDARD Beryllium-Associated Worker Registry Data Collection and Management Guidance U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1187-2007 ii Available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/NuclearSafety/techstds/ DOE-STD-1187-2007 iii FOREWORD 1. This standard provides acceptable methods for compliance with the requirements of paragraph 10 CFR 850.39 "Recordkeeping and Use of Information." Use of this standard is not mandatory. Users should review the document and determine if it meets their purpose. 2. Comments (recommendations, additions, and deletions) that may be of use in

360

Codes and standards and other guidance cited in regulatory documents  

SciTech Connect

As part of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Standard Review Plan Update and Development Program (SRP-UDP), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory developed a listing of industry consensus codes and standards and other government and industry guidance referred to in regulatory documents. The SRP-UDP has been completed and the SRP-Maintenance Program (SRP-MP) is now maintaining this listing. Besides updating previous information, Revision 3 adds approximately 80 citations. This listing identifies the version of the code or standard cited in the regulatory document, the regulatory document, and the current version of the code or standard. It also provides a summary characterization of the nature of the citation. This listing was developed from electronic searches of the Code of Federal Regulations and the NRC`s Bulletins, Information Notices, Circulars, Enforcement Manual, Generic Letters, Inspection Manual, Policy Statements, Regulatory Guides, Standard Technical Specifications and the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800).

Nickolaus, J.R.; Bohlander, K.L.

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "guidance statement operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Federal Renewable Energy Guidance to EPACT 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Renewable Energy Renewable Energy Guidance to EPACT 2005 David McAndrew FUPWG Sandestin Requirement Guidance Overview The guidance outlines the following: - Authority - Requirement - Definition of the renewable energy technologies & products - Requirements for qualifying renewable energy projects or purchases - How agencies renewable energy purchase toward energy reduction requirements will gradually phase out Authority The authority for this guidance is based on Section 203, FEDERAL PURCHASE REQUIREMENT of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 15852) and Executive Order 13423, Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management (72 FR 3919; January 24, 2007), and the instructions and guidance distributed by the Chairman of the Council for Environmental

362

DOE Guidance-Category Rating  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2010 2010 MEMORANDUM FOR HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTORS FROM: SARA"iJ. Boku1, DIRECToR OF HUMAN C~TAL MANAGEMENT SUBJECT: GUIDANCE MEMORANDUM #10 CATEGORY RATING The purpose of this memorandum is to establish the Department of Energy's (DOE's) policy for the use of Category Rating. Authorities: Public Law 107-296; Title 5 USC 3319; 5 CFR, Part 337, Subpart C., Presidential Memorandum of May 11, 2010 This guidance is established in accordance with 5 USC 3319, which authorizes Federal Agencies to use alternative rating proced.ures in assessing applicants for employment using category rating and selection procedures, and to ensure consistency in complying with federal regulations contained in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and the Department of

363

Building Energy Use Benchmarking Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Building Energy Use Benchmarking Guidance April 15, 2010 EISA SECTION 432 - Benchmarking of Federal Facilities (42 U.S.C. 8253 Subsection (f), Use of Energy and Water Efficiency Measures in Federal Buildings) I. Background A. Authority - Benchmarking Requirements Section 432 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA) requires the Secretary of the United States Department of Energy (DOE) to select or develop a building energy use benchmarking system and to issue guidance for use of the system. EISA requires the designated agency energy managers to enter energy use data for each metered building that is (or is a part of) a covered facility into a building energy use benchmarking system, such as the ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager tool (Portfolio Manager) (see 42 U.S.C. 8253(f)(8)(A), as

364

Multiyear Program Plan Template - Phase II Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Multiyear Program Plan Template Multiyear Program Plan Template Phase II Guidance June 30, 2006 Foreword: The Purpose and Value of a Multiyear Program Plan Multiyear Program Plans (MYPPs) are intended primarily to serve as operational guides for programs to manage their activities and as a source of information to help EERE management identify clear linkages between key program activities and progress toward goals. It is understood, however, that they are also read by a broad group of program stakeholders and may serve other purposes as well. Strategic planning in government is closely integrated with budgeting. In effective organizations, planning and strategy guide budget requests, not the other way around. Strategic planning enables programs to create logical budgets and manage their activities toward programmatic and

365

Guidance, Reports, and Documents | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sites » Guidance, Reports, and Documents Sites » Guidance, Reports, and Documents Guidance, Reports, and Documents The following are annual reports, guidance documents, and regulatory drivers for long-term surveillance and maintenance activities. Guidance and Reports Guidance for Developing and Implementing Long-Term Surveillance Plans for UMTRCA Title I and Title II Disposal Sites Process for Transition of Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title II Disposal Sites to the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management for Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Title I Disposal Sites Annual Report Title II Disposal Sites Annual Report Site Transition Framework Information and Records Management Transition Guidance Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Program 2003 Report Record of Decision for Ground Water

366

EIS-0422: Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

422: Draft Environmental Impact Statement 422: Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0422: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Central Ferry-Lower Monumental 500-kilovolt Transmission Line Project, Proposing to Construct, Operate, and Maintain a 38 to 40-Mile-Long 500-kilovolt (kV) Transmission Line PA is proposing to construct, operate, and maintain a 38- to 40-mile-long 500-kilovolt (kV) transmission line in Garfield, Columbia, and Walla Walla counties, Washington. The proposed line would extend west from BPA's planned Central Ferry Substation in Garfield County to BPA's Lower Monumental Substation located in Walla Walla County. BPA is considering four routing alternatives for the proposed Central Ferry-Lower Monumental transmission line; portions of all four routes would parallel existing BPA

367

EIS-0422: Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Draft Environmental Impact Statement Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0422: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Central Ferry-Lower Monumental 500-kilovolt Transmission Line Project, Proposing to Construct, Operate, and Maintain a 38 to 40-Mile-Long 500-kilovolt (kV) Transmission Line PA is proposing to construct, operate, and maintain a 38- to 40-mile-long 500-kilovolt (kV) transmission line in Garfield, Columbia, and Walla Walla counties, Washington. The proposed line would extend west from BPA's planned Central Ferry Substation in Garfield County to BPA's Lower Monumental Substation located in Walla Walla County. BPA is considering four routing alternatives for the proposed Central Ferry-Lower Monumental transmission line; portions of all four routes would parallel existing BPA

368

EIS-0433-S1: Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement | Department  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0433-S1: Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Keystone XL Project This EIS analyzes the potential environmental impacts of a revised proposal for the Keystone XL pipeline and related facilities. The proposed facilities would transport crude oil from the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin and the Williston Basin to existing pipeline facilities near Steele City, Nebraska, for onward transport to markets in the Texas Gulf Coast area. DOE is a cooperating agency. DOE's Western Area Power Administration has jurisdiction over certain proposed transmission facilities relating to the proposal, including construction and operation of a portion of a 230-kilovolt transmission line and construction and operation of two new

369

EIS-0318: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Environmental Impact Statement Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0318: Final Environmental Impact Statement Kentucky Pioneer Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Demonstration Project The Kentucky Pioneer IGCC Demonstration Project Final EIS assesses the potential environmental impacts that would result from a proposed DOE action to provide cost-shared financial support for construction and operation of an electrical power station demonstrating use of a Clean Coal Technology in Clark County, Kentucky. Under the Proposed Action, DOE would provide financial assistance, through a Cooperative Agreement with Kentucky Pioneer Energy, LLC, for design, construction, and operation of a 540 megawatt demonstration power station comprised of two synthesis gas-fired combined cycle units in Clark County, Kentucky. The station would also be

370

EIS-0351: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1: Final Environmental Impact Statement 1: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0351: Final Environmental Impact Statement Operation of Flaming Gorge Dam The Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior (Secretary), acting through the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), is considering whether to implement a proposed action under which Flaming Gorge Dam would be operated to achieve the flow and temperature regimes recommended in the September 2000 report Flow and Temperature Recommendations for Endangered Fishes in the Green River Downstream of Flaming Gorge Dam (2000 Flow and Temperature Recommendations), published by the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program (Recovery Program). EIS-0351-FEIS-01-2006.pdf EIS-0351-FEIS-02-2006.pdf EIS-0351-FEIS-03-2006.pdf More Documents & Publications

371

EIS-0329: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

29: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact 29: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0329: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facilities The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announces its intention to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a proposal to construct, operate, maintain, and decontaminate and decommission two depleted uranium hexafluoride (DUF 6) conversion facilities, at Portsmouth, Ohio, and Paducah, Kentucky. Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facilities (DOE/EIS-0329) (September 2001) More Documents & Publications EIS-0360: Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0360: Final Environmental Impact Statement

372

Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability of the Draft Supplement for the Programmatic EIS-Stockpile and Management for a Modern Pit Facility (MPF) Construction and Operation (6/6/03)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

34 34 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 109 / Friday, June 6, 2003 / Notices information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. Dated: May 28, 2003. Drusilla Hufford, Director, Global Programs Division. [FR Doc. 03-14323 Filed 6-5-03; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ER-FRL-6640-8] Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General Information (202)

373

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-04: Factual Bases for Issuing Consent  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-04: Factual Bases for Issuing Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-04: Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.23 and Compliance Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR Subpart C Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-04: Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.23 and Compliance Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR Subpart C DOE's Operational Procedures for Enforcement (June 1998), which supercede the DOE Enforcement Handbook (1087-95), provides the Office of Enforcement and Investigation with the opportunity to issue interim enforcement guidance from time to time with respect to processes to be used in this Office (see Section 1.3. Interim Enforcemen Guidance). In particular, it is important to provide contractors and others with explanations on how certain procedural mechanisms provided in Part 820 are utilized to fulfill

374

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 02-01: Enforcement Position Relative to 10  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enforcement Position Enforcement Position Relative to 10 CFR 835 Bioassay Accreditation Enforcement Guidance Supplement 02-01: Enforcement Position Relative to 10 CFR 835 Bioassay Accreditation Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedures for Enforcement, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity for the Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) to periodically issue clarifying guidance regarding the processes used in its enforcement activities. OE typically issues such guidance in the form of Enforcement Guidance Supplements (EGSs), which provide information or recommendations only and impose no requirements or actions on Department of Energy (DOE) contractors. Enforcement Guidance Supplement 02-01: Enforcement Position Relative to 10 CFR 835 Bioassay Accreditation More Documents & Publications

375

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 03-02: Revision to Occurrence Report-Based  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3-02: Revision to Occurrence 3-02: Revision to Occurrence Report-Based Noncompliance Tracking System Reporting Criteria Enforcement Guidance Supplement 03-02: Revision to Occurrence Report-Based Noncompliance Tracking System Reporting Criteria Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedures for Enforcement, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity for the Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) to periodically issue clarifying guidance regarding the processes used in its enforcement activities. OE typically issues such guidance in the form of Enforcement Guidance Supplements (EGS), which provide information or recommendations only and impose no requirements or actions on Department of Energy (DOE) contractors. Enforcement Guidance Supplement 03-02: Revision to Occurrence Report-Based

376

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-04: Factual Bases for Issuing Consent  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-04: Factual Bases for Issuing Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-04: Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.23 and Compliance Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR Subpart C Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-04: Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.23 and Compliance Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR Subpart C DOE's Operational Procedures for Enforcement (June 1998), which supercede the DOE Enforcement Handbook (1087-95), provides the Office of Enforcement and Investigation with the opportunity to issue interim enforcement guidance from time to time with respect to processes to be used in this Office (see Section 1.3. Interim Enforcement Guidance). In particular, it is important to provide contractors and others with explanations on how certain procedural mechanisms provided in Part 820 are utilized to fulfill

377

INTERPRETIVE GUIDANCE ON THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 C.F.R. § 205.322 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

INTERPRETIVE GUIDANCE ON THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 C.F.R. § 205.322 INTERPRETIVE GUIDANCE ON THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 C.F.R. § 205.322 INTERPRETIVE GUIDANCE ON THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 C.F.R. § 205.322 This guidance is intended to clarify the Department of Energy (DOE)'s interpretation of 10 C.F.R. § 205.322, which sets forth the contents of an application for a Presidential permit issued by DOE under Executive Order (E.O.) 10485, as amended by E.O. 12038. Anyone seeking to construct, operate, maintain, or connect an electric transmission facility crossing the borders of the United States must first obtain a Presidential permit. INTERPRETIVE GUIDANCE ON THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 C.F.R. § 205.322 More Documents & Publications Application for Presidential Permit OE Docket No. PP-371 Northern Pass: Comments from Conservation Law Foundation, Appalachian Mountain Club, and

378

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 02-01:Enforcement Position Relative to 10  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enforcement Position Relative Enforcement Position Relative to 10 CFR 835 Bioassay Accreditation Enforcement Guidance Supplement 02-01:Enforcement Position Relative to 10 CFR 835 Bioassay Accreditation Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedures for Enforcement, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity for the Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) to periodically issue clarifying guidance regarding the processes used in its enforcement activities. OE typically issues such guidance in the form of Enforcement Guidance Supplements (EGSs), which provide information or recommendations only and impose no requirements or actions on Department of Energy (DOE) contractors. Enforcement Guidance Supplement 02-01:Enforcement Position Relative to 10 CFR 835 Bioassay Accreditation More Documents & Publications

379

MEDICAL STATEMENT Participant Record (Confidential Information)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

MEDICAL STATEMENT Participant Record (Confidential Information) This is a statement in which you this statement prior to signing it. You must complete this Medical Statement, which includes the medical cold or congestion, epilepsy, a severe medical problem or who is under the influence of alcohol

Kavanagh, Karen L.

380

EIS-0389: Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Conduct Scoping Meetings; Notice of Floodplain and Wetlands Involvement EIS-0389: Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Conduct Scoping Meetings; Notice of Floodplain and Wetlands Involvement Construction and Operation of the Trinity Public Utility District Direct Interconnection Project, Trinity County, California The Western Area Power Administration (Western), Department of Energy (DOE), intends to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) to construct and operate proposed power transmission facilities in Trinity County, California. Western Area Power Administration Construction and Operation of the Trinity Public Utility District Direct Interconnection Project, Trinity County,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "guidance statement operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Instructions for the Supporting Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

C:\Documents and Settings\loganla\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\UZP4FQGA\Instructions for the Supporting C:\Documents and Settings\loganla\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\UZP4FQGA\Instructions for the Supporting Statementrev-includes BH table.doc General Instructions A Supporting Statement must accompany each request for approval of a collection of information. The Supporting Statement must be prepared in the format described below. If an item is not applicable, provide a brief explanation. When Item 17 of the OMB 83-I is checked "YES", Section B of the Supporting Statement must be completed. OMB reserves the right to require the submission of additional information with respect to any request for approval. Instructions for the Supporting Statement Each request for OMB approval of an information collection must include a Supporting

382

Impact Statements | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Freedom of Information Act » Reading Freedom of Information Act » Reading Room » Impact Statements Impact Statements Reading Room / Final Environment Impact Statements Record of Decision on Bonneville Power Administration's Lyle Falls Fish Passage Project (DOE/EIS-3790, November 2008). February 2009. Records of Decision on Bonneville Power Administration's (BPA0 Leaning Juniper II Wind Project and Jones Canyon Substation Expansion tiered to BPA's Business Plan Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0183, June 1995). April 9, 2009. Final EIS on Bonneville Power Administration's Lyle Falls Fish Passage Project (DOE/EIS-0397, November 2008). December 10, 2008. BPA's Record of Decision 2008 Columbia Basin Fish Accords with the Shshone-Bannock Tribes tiered to the (DOE/EIS -0312, April 2003) and ROD

383

Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 2010 1, 2010 EIS-0409: Final Environmental Impact Statement Kemper County Integrated Gasification Combined-Cycle (IGCC) Project April 9, 2010 EIS-0404: Final Environmental Impact Statement Los Vaqueros Reservoir Expansion Project, California April 9, 2010 EIS-0455: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Genesis Solar Energy Project, Riverside County, CA April 1, 2010 EIS-0415: Final Environmental Impact Statement Deer Creek Station Energy Facility Project Brookings County, South Dakota February 19, 2010 EIS-0443: Final Environmental Impact Statement Project Financing for Southwest Intertie Project-South January 29, 2010 EIS-0423: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Long-Term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury January 1, 2010 EIS-0418: Draft Environmental Impact Statement

384

STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

extraction efficiency enhancement, low operating voltage materials and structure, high quantum efficiency and stable white emitters, and stacked architecture. This waiver is for...

385

Guidance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

53 53 Guide for Performing Screening Ecological Risk Assessments at DOE Facilities This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; prices available from 615-576-8401 (fax 615-576-2865). Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161. ES/ER/TM-153 Guide for Performing Screening Ecological Risk Assessments at DOE Facilities G. W. Suter II Date Issued-September 1995 Prepared by the Environmental Restoration Risk Assessment Program, Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management under budget and reporting code EW 20

386

DOE Guidance on the Use of the SSN  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Guidance on the Use of the SSN Guidance on the Use of the SSN (February 2009) Acceptable Uses The acceptable uses of the Social Security number (SSN) are those that are provided for by law, Executive Order, regulation, or are required by DOE operational necessities. Those systems, processes, or forms that claim "operational necessity" shall be closely scrutinized by senior program management. The use of the SSN shall be primarily limited to transactions that specifically require the presentation of the SSN to meet a legal or regulatory requirement. Most applications that require the SSN for specific transactions do not require its use for every transaction. Executive Order (E.O.) 13478, Amendment to Executive Order 9397 (E.O. that established the use of SSNs) Relating to Federal Agency Use of Social Security

387

Business Plan : Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Volume 2, Appendices.  

SciTech Connect

This document contains the appendices for the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Business Plan: Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Included are: BPA products and services; Rate design; Methodology and assumptions for numerical analysis; Retail utility operations; Comments and responses to the draft business plan EIS.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1995-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

388

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission organization charts and functional statements  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document contains organization charts for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and for the five offices of the NRC. Function statements are provided delineating the major responsibilities and operations of each office. Organization and function are provided to the branch level. The head of each office, division, and branch is also listed.

NONE

1997-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

389

Acquisition Plan Strategy and Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 01 ACQUISITION PLAN STRATEGY AND GUIDANCE NOTE: The process provided below is not intended to replace an agency's acquisition planning requirements. INSTRUCTIONS 1. Work with your DOE Federal Finance Specialist to determine whether a "pay from savings" project is feasible. a. Determine if appropriated dollars are available to offset some of the costs. b. Consider alternative finance options: Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC), Utility Energy Service Contract (UESC), Power Purchase Agreement (PPA), or Enhanced Use Lease (EUL) Scott Wolf 6848 Cooper Point Road NW Olympia, WA 98502 Phone: 360-866-9163 Fax: 360-866-9683 scott.wolf@ee.doe.gov Serving Montana, Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, Nebraska, New Mexico,

390

Interim Guidance on Chemical Cleaning of Supercritical Units  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Waterwall tubes in some of the existing fleet of supercritical steam generators operating with oxygenated water treatment (OT) are experiencing the growth of duplex oxide scales of similar morphology to those found in the circuitry of steam-touched superheater and reheater tubing. EPRI report 1015656, Oxide Scale Growth Characteristics in Waterwall Tubes of Supercritical Steam Boilers, examined the conditions at which these oxides are formed. This report provides guidance on the proper monitoring of wate...

2010-05-11T23:59:59.000Z

391

Maintenance Work Package Planning Guidance for Fossil Power Plant Personnel  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The work management process is one of the core business processes for operation and maintenance of fossil power plants. The preparation of work packages is a key element of this overall process. The purpose of this report is to provide guidance to power plant personnel regarding work package quality, by providing a consistent approach for administrative control, achieving an appropriate level-of-detail, ensuring an acceptable level-of-use, work package format, and application.

2005-12-21T23:59:59.000Z

392

DOE-HDBK-3012-2003; DOE Handbook Guide to Good Practices for Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR) Team Leader's Guide  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NOT MEASUREMENT NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-HDBK-3012-2003 SUPERSEDING DOE-HDBK-3012-96 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) TEAM LEADER'S GUIDE U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-HDBK-3012-2003 FOREWORD This Department of Energy handbook, Guide to Good Practices for Conducting Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR) Team Leader's Handbook, is approved for use by all DOE Components and their contractors. The guidance in this document is the distillation of the experience and lessons learned during numerous operational readiness reviews contributed by team leaders with a wide range of backgrounds. There are

393

Preparation for Facility Operations RM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The objective of this Standard Review Plan (SRP) on Preparation for Facility Operations is to provide consistency guidance to evaluate the effectiveness of the final project closure of major...

394

STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

a uranium oxide form (U3O, and UC2) and simultaneously produce an anhydrous hydrogen fluoride (AHF) byproduct. The pilot plant system will be designed and operated to provide data...

395

Statement of Considerations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

under Agreements Entered into Pursuant to the Fiscal Year 1994 Foreign Operations Appropriations Act (P.L. 103- 87); W(C) 94-010 The dissolution of the Soviet Union and the...

396

STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

in the technology of this project. Chevron currently operates approximately 30,319 oil and gas wells in the U.S. and about 34,727 oil and gas wells world wide. It has...

397

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 03-02, Revision to Occurrence Report-Based Noncompliance Tracking System Reporting Criteria  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

03-02 03-02 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 5, 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR: DOE PAAA COORDINATORS CONTRACTOR PAAA COORDINATORS FROM: STEPHEN M. SOHINKI DIRECTOR OFFICE OF PRICE-ANDERSON ENFORCEMENT SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 03-02: Revision to Occurrence Report-Based Noncompliance Tracking System Reporting Criteria Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedures for Enforcement, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity for the Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) to periodically issue clarifying guidance regarding the processes used in its enforcement activities. OE typically issues such guidance in the form of Enforcement Guidance Supplements (EGS), which provide information or recommendations only and impose

398

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-02: Price-Anderson Amendment Act (PAAA)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2: Price-Anderson Amendment Act 2: Price-Anderson Amendment Act (PAAA) Program Reviews Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-02: Price-Anderson Amendment Act (PAAA) Program Reviews Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedures for Enforcement, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity for the Office of Enforcement and Investigation (EHEnforcement) to periodically issue clarifying guidance regarding the processes used in its enforcement activities. During 1999, EH-Enforcement began an initiative to conduct formal reviews of contractor programs for identifying, reporting, tracking and closing PAAA noncompliances. Four main objectives were associated with this initiative: into existing EH-Enforcement guidance. Encourage the establishment of effective programs for noncompliance identification

399

EIS-0380: Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

380: Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement 380: Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0380: Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico NNSA proposes to continue operating Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), which is located in Los Alamos County in north-central New Mexico. NNSA has identified and assessed three alternatives for continued operation of LANL: (1) No Action, (2) Reduced Operations, and (3) Expanded Operations. Under the No Action Alternative, NNSA would continue the historical mission support activities conducted at LANL at currently approved operational levels. Under the Reduced Operations Alternative, NNSA would eliminate some activities and limit the operations of other activities. Under the Expanded

400

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office Office HOME ABOUT ENERGY EFFICIENT TECHNOLOGIES RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS APPLIANCE & EQUIPMENT STANDARDS BUILDING ENERGY CODES EERE » Building Technologies Office » Appliances & Equipment Standards About Standards & Test Procedures Implementation, Certification & Enforcement Rulemakings & Notices Further Guidance ENERGY STAR® Guidance and Frequently Asked Questions This webpage is designed to provide guidance and answer Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the U.S. Department of Energy's appliance standards program. Guidance types span all covered products and covered equipment and cover such topics as: definitions, scope of coverage, conservation standards, test procedures, certification, Compliance and Certification Management System (CCMS), and enforcement. This website offers users an

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "guidance statement operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Security and Cyber Evaluations - Guidance Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Guidance Documents Security and Cyber Evaluations Security Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide, April 2008 Cyber Security Evaluations Appraisal Process Guide, April 2008 Security...

402

Building Technologies Office: Workforce Guidance Development...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Send a link to Building Technologies Office: Workforce Guidance Development: By Industry, For Industry to someone by E-mail Share Building Technologies Office: Workforce...

403

Guidance on Incorporating EPA's Pollution Prevention Strategy...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review Process The guidance discusses the Environmental Protection Agency's definition of pollution prevention; how to incorporate pollution prevention into the EPA...

404

2010_Nuclear_Security_Joint_Statement.pdf | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NuclearSecurityJointStatement.pdf 2010NuclearSecurityJointStatement.pdf 2010NuclearSecurityJointStatement.pdf More Documents & Publications United States and France...

405

EIS-0440: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Impact Statement EIS-0440: Final Environmental Impact Statement Quartzsite Solar Energy Project The Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) consists of a summary...

406

EIS-0283: Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0283: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Surplus Plutonium Disposition Draft Environmental Impact Statement This EIS evaluates the potential...

407

EIS-0473: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

73: Final Environmental Impact Statement 73: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0473: Final Environmental Impact Statement W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project (PCCS), Fort Bend County, TX This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts of a proposal to provide financial assistance for a project proposed by NRG Energy, Inc (NRG). DOE selected NRG's proposed W.A. Parish Post-Combustion carbon dioxide (CO2) Capture and Sequestration Project for a financial assistance award through a competitive process under the Clean Coal Power Initiative Program. NRG would design, construct and operate a commercial-scale CO2 capture facility at its existing W.A. Parish Generating Station in Fort Bend County, Texas; deliver the CO2 via a new pipeline to the existing West Ranch oil field in Jackson County, Texas, for use in enhanced oil recovery

408

EIS-0425: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Environmental Impact Statement Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0425: Final Environmental Impact Statement Bonneville Power Administration Mid-Columbia Coho Restoration Project, Chelan and Okanogan Counties, WA This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts of DOE's Bonneville Power Administration's proposal to fund the construction, operation, and maintenance of a coho salmon restoration program sponsored by the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation to help mitigate impacts to fish affected by the Federal Columbia River Power System dams on the Columbia River. The Proposed Action would involve building a new, small, in-basin adult holding/spawning, incubation and rearing facility on the Wenatchee River at one of two potential sites; and constructing and improving several sites in both the Wenatchee and Methow river basins in

409

EIS-0433: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Environmental Impact Statement Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0433: Final Environmental Impact Statement Keystone XL Project Summary: The U.S. Department of State has issued the Final EIS for the Keystone XL Project. The proposed action is to construct and operate a crude oil pipeline and related facilities at the international border and continuing into the United States to transport Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin crude oil and other crude oils to a proposed tank farm in Cushing, Oklahoma, and to delivery points in Point Arthur and east Houston areas of Texas. The proposed pipeline would traverse Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Texas, with localized facilities constructed on an existing segment of pipeline in Kansas. DOE's Western Area Power Administration participated as a cooperating

410

EIS-0308: Record of Decision and Floodplain Statement | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8: Record of Decision and Floodplain Statement 8: Record of Decision and Floodplain Statement EIS-0308: Record of Decision and Floodplain Statement Interconnection of the Southpoint Power Plant with the Wester Area Power Administration's Parker-Davis No. 1 and No. 2, 230-kilovolt Transmission Lines Western has determined that no significant environmental impacts will result from construction, operation and maintenance of Calpine Corporation's Southpoint Power Plant, the two natural gas pipelines, or the approximately 7 miles of high voltage transmission lines, or from the upgrade of the Parker-Davis No. 1 230-kilovolt (kV) transmission line. Therefore, Western has decided to provide an interconnection with the plant and Western's transmission system in west central Arizona. However, Calpine has yet to obtain a permit from the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)

411

Environmental Impact Statements and Environmental Assessments Status Chart  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 5, 2011 August 5, 2011 EIS-0444: EPA Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement Texas Clean Energy Project, Ector, Texas August 3, 2011 EA-1840: Final Environmental Assessment California Valley Solar Ranch Project in San Luis Obispo and Kern Counties, California August 3, 2011 EA-1840: Finding of No Significant Impact Loan Guarantee to High Plains II, LLC for the California Valley Solar Ranch Project in San Luis Obispo County and Kern County, California July 29, 2011 EIS-0426: Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement Continued Operation of the Nevada National Security Site and Off-Site Locations in the State of Nevada July 29, 2011 EIS-0426: DOE Notice of Availability of the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement and Notice of Public Hearings

412

Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- Nevada Rail - Nevada Rail Transportation Corridor DOE/EIS-0250F-S2 and Final Env Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada -- Nevada Rail Transportation Corridor DOE/EIS-0250F-S2 and Final Env The Summary of the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada -- Nevada Rail Transportation Corridor DOE/EIS-0250F-S2 and Final Environmental Impact Statement for a Rail Alignment for the Construction and Operation of a Railroad in Nevada to a Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nye County,

413

EIS-0303: Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

03: Draft Environmental Impact Statement 03: Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0303: Draft Environmental Impact Statement High-Level Waste Tank Closure, Savannah River Operations Office, Aiken, SC This EIS evalutes the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to close the high-level waste tanks at the Savannah River Site in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, DOE Orders, and the Industrial Wastewater Closure Plan for F- and H-Area High-Level Waste Tank Systems (approved by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control), which specifies the management of residuals as waste incidental to reprocessing. The proposed action would begin after bulk waste removal has been completed. This EIS evaluates three alternatives regarding the HLW tanks at the SRS. The three alternatives are the Clean and Stabilize Tanks

414

EIS-0414: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

14: Final Environmental Impact Statement 14: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0414: Final Environmental Impact Statement Energia Sierra Juarez Transmission Project This EIS evaluates the potential environmental impacts from DOE's proposed Federal action of granting a Presidential permit to Energia Sierra Juarez U.S. Tranmssion, LLC (ESJ-U.S.), a subsidiary of Sempra Generation, to construct, operate, maintain, and connect a 1.7-mile transmission line (0.65 miles in the U.S.) across the international border between the U.S. and Mexico, near the town of Jacumba, California. The County of San Diego is a cooperating agency in the preparation of this EIS. EIS-0414-FEIS-2012-Volume1.pdf EIS-0414-FEIS-2012-Volume2a.pdf EIS-0414-FEIS-2012-Volume2b.pdf EIS-0414-FEIS-2012-Volume3a.pdf EIS-0414-FEIS-2012-Volume3b.pdf

415

EIS-0319: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Environmental Impact Statement Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0319: Final Environmental Impact Statement Relocation of Technical Area 18 Capabilities and Materials at the Los Alamos National Laboratory The TA-18 Relocation EIS evaluates the potential direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental impacts associated with this proposed action at the following DOE sites: (1) a different site at LANL at Los Alamos, New Mexico; (2) the Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico at Albuquerque, New Mexico; (3) the Nevada Test Site near Las Vegas, Nevada (the Preferred Alternative); and (4) the Argonne National Laboratory-West near Idaho Falls, Idaho. The EIS also analyzes the alternatives of upgrading the existing TA-18 facilities and the No Action Alternative of maintaining the operations at the current TA-18 location.

416

EIS-0365: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Environmental Impact Statement Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0365: Final Environmental Impact Statement Imperial-Mexicali 230-kV Transmission Lines A U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Presidential permit is required to construct, operate, maintain, and connect an electric transmission line across the U.S.-Mexico border. On February 27, 2001, Baja California Power, Inc., InterGen Aztec Energy, V.B.V. (hereafter referred to as Intergen), filed an application with DOE, Office of Fossil Energy, for a Presidential permit for a double-circuit, 230-kV transmission line extending from the Imperial Valley Substation in California for a distance of about 6 mi (10 km) to a point west of Calexico at the U.S.-Mexico border. EIS-0365-FEIS-01-2004.pdf EIS-0365-FEIS-02-2004.pdf EIS-0365-FEIS-FiguresTables-2004.pdf

417

EIS-0247: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Environmental Impact Statement Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0247: Final Environmental Impact Statement Construction and Operation of the Spallation Neutron Source The United States needs a high-flux, short- pulsed neutron source to provide its scientific and industrial research communities with a much more intense source of pulsed neutrons for neutron scattering research than is currently available. This source would assure the availability of a state-of-the-art neutron research facility in the United States in the decades ahead. This facility would be used to conduct research in areas such as materials science, condensed matter physics, the molecular structure of biological materials, properties of polymers and complex fluids, and magnetism. In addition to creating new scientific and

418

EIS-0372: Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Draft Environmental Impact Statement Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0372: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Bangor Hydro-Electric Company (BHE) Northeast Reliability Interconnect The purpose and need for DOE's action is to respond to BHE's request to amend Presidential Permit PP-89. DOE may issue or amend a Presidential permit if it determines that the action is in the public interest and after obtaining favorable recommendations from the U.S. Departments of State and Defense. In determining whether issuance or amendment of a permit for a proposed action is in the public interest, DOE considers the environmental impacts of the proposed project pursuant to NEPA, the project's impact on electric reliability by ascertaining whether the proposed project would adversely affect the operation of the U.S. electric power supply system

419

EIS-0401: Notice of Cancellation of an Environmental Impact Statement |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1: Notice of Cancellation of an Environmental Impact 1: Notice of Cancellation of an Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0401: Notice of Cancellation of an Environmental Impact Statement Proposed NextGen Project near Selby, Walworth County, South Dakota The Department of Energy, Western Area Power Administration is issuing this notice of cancellation for the preparation of an environmental impact statement for the Proposed NextGen Project near Selby, Walworth County, South Dakota. Basin Electric Power Cooperative (BEPC) proposed to design construct, operate, and maintain a 500- to 700-megawatt base load, coal-fired generation facility near Selby, Walworth County, South Dakota, and interconnect it with Western's transmission system. BEPC has notified Western it is suspending further action on its proposed project.

420

EIS-0414: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Environmental Impact Statement Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0414: Final Environmental Impact Statement Energia Sierra Juarez Transmission Project This EIS evaluates the potential environmental impacts from DOE's proposed Federal action of granting a Presidential permit to Energia Sierra Juarez U.S. Tranmssion, LLC (ESJ-U.S.), a subsidiary of Sempra Generation, to construct, operate, maintain, and connect a 1.7-mile transmission line (0.65 miles in the U.S.) across the international border between the U.S. and Mexico, near the town of Jacumba, California. The County of San Diego is a cooperating agency in the preparation of this EIS. EIS-0414-FEIS-2012-Volume1.pdf EIS-0414-FEIS-2012-Volume2a.pdf EIS-0414-FEIS-2012-Volume2b.pdf EIS-0414-FEIS-2012-Volume3a.pdf EIS-0414-FEIS-2012-Volume3b.pdf

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "guidance statement operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

EIS-0247: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

247: Final Environmental Impact Statement 247: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0247: Final Environmental Impact Statement Construction and Operation of the Spallation Neutron Source The United States needs a high-flux, short- pulsed neutron source to provide its scientific and industrial research communities with a much more intense source of pulsed neutrons for neutron scattering research than is currently available. This source would assure the availability of a state-of-the-art neutron research facility in the United States in the decades ahead. This facility would be used to conduct research in areas such as materials science, condensed matter physics, the molecular structure of biological materials, properties of polymers and complex fluids, and magnetism. In addition to creating new scientific and

422

EIS-0414: Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

14: Draft Environmental Impact Statement 14: Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0414: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Energia Sierra Juarez Transmission Project Energia Sierra Juarez U.S. Transmission, LLC (ESJ-U.S.), a subsidiary of Sempra Generation, has applied to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) for a Presidential permit to construct, operate, maintain, and connect a 1.7-mile transmission line (0.65 miles in the U.S.) across the international border between the U.S. and Mexico, near the town of Jacumba, California. The EIS addresses the environmental impacts of the proposed transmission line and the range of reasonable alternatives. Five alternatives were identified in this EIS, three of which were carried forward for detailed analysis (the No Action Alternative, a Double-Circuit 230-kilovolt (kV) Transmission Line

423

EIS-0285: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

: Final Environmental Impact Statement : Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0285: Final Environmental Impact Statement Transmission System Vegetation Management Program Bonneville Power Administration (Bonneville) is responsible for maintaining a network of 24,000 kilometers (km) or 15,000 miles (mi.) of electric transmission lines and 350 substations. This electric transmission system operates in seven states of the Pacific Northwest. (See Figure I-1). The seven states offer a great diversity of vegetation. This vegetation can interfere with electric power flow, pose safety problems for us and neighboring members of the public, and interfere with our ability to maintain these facilities. We need to keep vegetation a safe distance away from our electric power facilities and control noxious weeds at our

424

EIS-0476: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EIS-0476: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0476: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0476: Final Environmental Impact Statement Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 3 and 4, Issuance of a Loan Guarantee to Support Funding for Construction, Burke County, GA The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is proposing to issue a loan guarantee to several applicants to support funding for construction and start-up of the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP), Units 3 and 4, an advanced nuclear generating facility for the production of electric power (the Project). The VEGP Units 3 and 4 would be located in a rural area in eastern Burke County, Georgia, which is already the site of two operating nuclear reactor units (VEGP Units 1 and 2). Georgia Power Corporation (GPC), Oglethorpe Power Corporation (OPC), and the Municipal Electric

425

EIS-0305: Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5: Draft Environmental Impact Statement 5: Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0305: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Treating Transuranic/Alpha Low-Level Waste at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory This EIS evaluates the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to construct, operate, and decontaminate/decommission a TRU Waste Treatment Facility in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The four waste types that would be treated at the proposed facility would be remote-handled TRU mixed waste sludge, liquid low-level waste associated with the sludge, contact-handled TRU/alpha low-level waste solids, and remote-handled TRU/alpha low-levelwaste solids. The mixed sludge and some of the solid waste contain metals regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and may be classified as mixed waste.

426

EIS-0303: Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Draft Environmental Impact Statement Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0303: Draft Environmental Impact Statement High-Level Waste Tank Closure, Savannah River Operations Office, Aiken, SC This EIS evalutes the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to close the high-level waste tanks at the Savannah River Site in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, DOE Orders, and the Industrial Wastewater Closure Plan for F- and H-Area High-Level Waste Tank Systems (approved by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control), which specifies the management of residuals as waste incidental to reprocessing. The proposed action would begin after bulk waste removal has been completed. This EIS evaluates three alternatives regarding the HLW tanks at the SRS. The three alternatives are the Clean and Stabilize Tanks

427

EIS-0473: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Environmental Impact Statement Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0473: Final Environmental Impact Statement W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project (PCCS), Fort Bend County, TX This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts of a proposal to provide financial assistance for a project proposed by NRG Energy, Inc (NRG). DOE selected NRG's proposed W.A. Parish Post-Combustion carbon dioxide (CO2) Capture and Sequestration Project for a financial assistance award through a competitive process under the Clean Coal Power Initiative Program. NRG would design, construct and operate a commercial-scale CO2 capture facility at its existing W.A. Parish Generating Station in Fort Bend County, Texas; deliver the CO2 via a new pipeline to the existing West Ranch oil field in Jackson County, Texas, for use in enhanced oil recovery

428

EIS-0378: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

: Final Environmental Impact Statement : Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0378: Final Environmental Impact Statement Port Angeles-Juan de Fuca Transmission Project Sea Breeze Olympic Converter LP (Sea Breeze) has applied to DOE for authorizations and approvals necessary to construct the United States (U.S.) portion of an international electric power transmission cable. Sea Breeze's proposed cable would extend from the greater Victoria area (View Royal), British Columbia, Canada, across the Strait of Juan de Fuca to Port Angeles, Clallam County, WA, U.S. The U.S. portion is called the Port Angeles-Juan de Fuca Transmission Project. Sea Breeze has applied to DOE/OE for a Presidential permit to construct, operate, maintain, and connect the proposed cable across the U.S.-Canada international border.

429

EIS-0232: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Environmental Impact Statement Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0232: Final Environmental Impact Statement Power Marketing Program The Sierra Nevada Region needs to determine the level and character of capacity, energy, and other services that will be marketed beyond 2004. These services would be developed by combining potential hydropower operating approaches with power purchases. The Sierra Nevada Region also needs to establish eligibility and allocation criteria for the allocations of electric power resources to be marketed under contracts that will replace those expiring in 2004. EIS-0232-FEIS-Summary-1999.pdf DOE/EIS-0232, Western Area Power Administration, Nevada (1999) EIS-0232-FEIS-02-1999.pdf EIS-0232-FEIS-Figures-1999.pdf More Documents & Publications EIS-0232: Record of Decision

430

EIS-0340: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Environmental Impact Statement Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0340: Final Environmental Impact Statement NE Oregon Hatchery Program: Grande Ronde Imnaha Spring Chinook Project The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has a responsibility to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife affected by the Federal Columbia River Power System (Northwest Power Act, 16 U.S.C. § 839 et seq). One species covered by that mandate is the Snake River spring/summer chinook salmon listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). BPA is now evaluating whether to provide funding for final design, property acquisition, construction, modification, operation, and maintenance of facilities to better implement existing, pre-approved programs of hatchery fish production for Snake River spring/summer chinook native to the Grande

431

EIS-0409: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Environmental Impact Statement Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0409: Final Environmental Impact Statement Kemper County Integrated Gasification Combined-Cycle (IGCC) Project This Final EIS assesses the potential environmental impacts that would result from a proposed DOE action to provide cost-shared funding and possibly a loan guarantee for construction and operation of advanced power generation plant in Kemper County, Mississippi. The project was selected under DOE's Clean Coal Power Initiative to demonstrate IGCC technology. DOE also invited Mississippi Power Company to submit an application for the Kemper County IGCC Project to the Loan Guarantee Program during 2008. Assessment of a prospective loan guarantee is currently in progress. The power genera- tion components (i.e., coal gasifiers, synthesis gas [syngas]

432

EIS-0194: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EIS-0194: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0194: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0194: Final Environmental Impact Statement Tenaska Washington II Generation Project, Washington BPA is considering whether to purchase electrical power from a proposed privately-owned combustion-turbine electrical generation plant in Washington. The plant would be fired by natural gas and would use combined-cycle technology to generate 240 average megawatts (aMW) of energy. The plant would be developed, owned, and operated by Tenaska Washington Partners II, L.P. The project would be located about 19 kilometers (12 miles) southeast of downtown Tacoma in the Frederickson Industrial Area, Pierce County. The proposed plant would occupy about half of a 6.4-hectare (16-acre) parcel and would be consistent with the

433

EIS-0213: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

13: Final Environmental Impact Statement 13: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0213: Final Environmental Impact Statement Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery Program Bonneville Power Administration, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, and the Nez Perce Tribe propose a supplementation program to restore chinook salmon to the Clearwater River Subbasin in Idaho. The Clearwater River is a tributary to the Snake River, which empties into the Columbia River. The Final EIS includes a new alternative suggested by commentors to the Draft EIS. In the Proposed Action, the Nez Perce Tribe would build and operate two central incubation and rearing hatcheries and six satellite facilities. Spring and fall chinook salmon would be reared and acclimated to different areas in the Subbasin and released at the hatchery and satellite sites or in other

434

EIS-0414: Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Draft Environmental Impact Statement Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0414: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Energia Sierra Juarez Transmission Project Energia Sierra Juarez U.S. Transmission, LLC (ESJ-U.S.), a subsidiary of Sempra Generation, has applied to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) for a Presidential permit to construct, operate, maintain, and connect a 1.7-mile transmission line (0.65 miles in the U.S.) across the international border between the U.S. and Mexico, near the town of Jacumba, California. The EIS addresses the environmental impacts of the proposed transmission line and the range of reasonable alternatives. Five alternatives were identified in this EIS, three of which were carried forward for detailed analysis (the No Action Alternative, a Double-Circuit 230-kilovolt (kV) Transmission Line

435

EIS-0422: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

422: Final Environmental Impact Statement 422: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0422: Final Environmental Impact Statement Central Ferry-Lower Monumental 500-kilovolt Transmission Line Project BPA is proposing to construct, operate, and maintain a 38- to 40-mile-long 500-kilovolt (kV) transmission line in Garfield, Columbia, and Walla Walla counties, Washington. The proposed line would extend west from BPA's planned Central Ferry Substation in Garfield County to BPA's Lower Monumental Substation located in Walla Walla County. BPA is considering four routing alternatives for the proposed Central Ferry-Lower Monumental transmission line; portions of all four routes would parallel existing BPA lines in the area. Two of the routing alternatives for the transmission line are about 38 miles long, and the other two are about 40 miles long.

436

EIS-0468: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8: Final Environmental Impact Statement 8: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0468: Final Environmental Impact Statement Proposed American Centrifuge Plant in Piketon, Ohio Pike County, Ohio Proposed Action: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is proposing to issue a loan guarantee to USEC Inc., to support funding for the American Centrifuge Project (ACP) in Piketon, Ohio. The facility would be located on an existing DOE reservation (Portsmouth Reservation) in Pike County, Ohio. The ACP would be an advanced uranium enrichment facility (utilizing centrifuge technology) for the production of commercial nuclear fuel. In August 2004, prior to DOE Loan Programs Office (LP) involvement in the ACP project, USEC Inc., submitted a license application for the construction and operation of the ACP to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

437

EIS-0349: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Environmental Impact Statement Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0349: Final Environmental Impact Statement BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project BP West Coast Products, LLC proposes to construct and operate a 720-megawatt, natural-gas-fired, combined-cycle cogeneration facility on land adjacent to its BP Cherry Point Refinery. This EIS assesses the existing natural and built environment, evaluates the potential environmental impacts and economic benefits of the proposed action, and identifies mitigation measures to compensate for the unavoidable impacts. Alternative project sites, power-generating and pollution-control technologies, and the No Action Alternative also are described. EIS-0349-FEIS-01-2004.pdf EIS-0349-FEIS-02-2004.pdf EIS-0349-FEIS-Figures-2004.pdf EIS-0349-FEIS-Appendices-2004.pdf

438

EIS-0476: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

76: Final Environmental Impact Statement 76: Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0476: Final Environmental Impact Statement Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 3 and 4, Issuance of a Loan Guarantee to Support Funding for Construction, Burke County, GA The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is proposing to issue a loan guarantee to several applicants to support funding for construction and start-up of the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP), Units 3 and 4, an advanced nuclear generating facility for the production of electric power (the Project). The VEGP Units 3 and 4 would be located in a rural area in eastern Burke County, Georgia, which is already the site of two operating nuclear reactor units (VEGP Units 1 and 2). Georgia Power Corporation (GPC), Oglethorpe Power Corporation (OPC), and the Municipal Electric

439

EIS-0473: Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Draft Environmental Impact Statement Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0473: Draft Environmental Impact Statement W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project, Fort Bend County, Texas This EIS evaluates the potential impacts associated with DOE's Proposed Action to provide financial assistance to NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) and with NRG's proposed W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project (Parish PCCS Project). DOE's Proposed Action would provide $167 million in cost-shared financial assistance to NRG under the Clean Coal Power Initiative (CCPI) Program to support construction and operation of NRG's Parish PCCS Project . EIS-0473-DEIS-Summary-2012.pdf EIS-0473-DEIS-VolumeI-2012.pdf EIS-0473-DEIS-VolumeII-AppendicesA-B-2012.pdf EIS-0473-DEIS-VolumeII-AppendixC-Part1-2012.pdf

440

EIS-0422: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Environmental Impact Statement Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0422: Final Environmental Impact Statement Central Ferry-Lower Monumental 500-kilovolt Transmission Line Project BPA is proposing to construct, operate, and maintain a 38- to 40-mile-long 500-kilovolt (kV) transmission line in Garfield, Columbia, and Walla Walla counties, Washington. The proposed line would extend west from BPA's planned Central Ferry Substation in Garfield County to BPA's Lower Monumental Substation located in Walla Walla County. BPA is considering four routing alternatives for the proposed Central Ferry-Lower Monumental transmission line; portions of all four routes would parallel existing BPA lines in the area. Two of the routing alternatives for the transmission line are about 38 miles long, and the other two are about 40 miles long.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "guidance statement operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Secretary Chu's Statement on the August 23 Earthquake | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statement on the August 23 Earthquake Statement on the August 23 Earthquake Secretary Chu's Statement on the August 23 Earthquake August 24, 2011 - 2:30pm Addthis Secretary Chu Secretary Chu Former Secretary of Energy Dear Colleagues: I want to take a moment to thank all of our employees and contractors in the Washington, D.C. metro area who responded to yesterday's earthquake with great calm and professionalism. All six DOE buildings in the area were safely evacuated and we have no reports of any injuries to our staff or visitors. Our facilities staff, in partnership with the General Services Administration, conducted a careful assessment of the structural and operational integrity of our buildings, and we are open for business today. Yesterday was another reminder that we must be vigilant and well prepared

442

Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 EIS-0158-S2: Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Program Environmental Impact Report for the Sale of the Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 1 at Elk Hills, California September 1, 1997 EIS-0026-S2: Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Carlsbad Area Office, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Disposal Phase July 1, 1997 EIS-0213: Final Environmental Impact Statement Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery Program June 6, 1997 EIS-0200: Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Managing Treatment, Storage, and Disposal of Radioactive and Hazardous Waste December 1, 1996 EIS-0229: Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile Materials December 1, 1996 EIS-0198: Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement

443

Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 1, 2003 July 1, 2003 EIS-0336: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Tucson Electric Power Company Sahuarita-Nogales Transmission Line June 6, 2003 EIS-0236-S2: Draft Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Stockpile Stewardship and Management for a Modern Pit Facility June 2, 2003 EIS-0345: Final Environmental Impact Statement Plymouth Generating Facility Plymouth, Washington June 2, 2003 EIS-0317-S1: Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Kangley-Echo Lake Transmission Line Project May 23, 2003 EIS-0340: Draft Environmental Impact Statement NE Oregon Hatchery Program: Grande Ronde Imnaha Spring Chinook Project May 15, 2003 EIS-0350: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building Replacement Project at Los

444

Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada Summary U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management DOE/EIS-0250F-S1 June 2008 Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada Summary U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management DOE/EIS-0250F-S1 June 2008 Foreword COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) TITLE: Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada

445

Notice of Availability of the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM (DOE/EIS-0380D) (07/07/06)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

638 Federal Register 638 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 130 / Friday, July 7, 2006 / Notices 1 Northern Natural Gas Company, 115 FERC ¶ 61,254 (2006). 1 Pinnacle West Capital Corp., 115 FERC ¶ 61,292 (2006). DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. RP06-332-000] Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Technical Conference June 28, 2006. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission will convene a technical conference regarding Northern Natural Gas Company's proposal to adjust the boundary of its Operational Zones ABC and EF to the Iowa/Minnesota border in order to provide that delivery points in northern Iowa currently located in Operational Zone EF be moved to Operational Zone ABC, and delivery points in southwestern Minnesota currently located in Operational Zone

446

TSP Project Justification Statement Template  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Program Project Justification Statement As part of the new justification process for developing or revising DOE Technical Standards, organizations, please provide the following information (in numeric format) in a Project Justification Statement (PJS) prior to submitting the requisite Project Registration and Approval Request form (F 1300.5). For organizations planning to register a new or proposed revision to a Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standard, please be advised that the justification approval process has been modified. Prior to registering a TSP Project, development must be justified. Please prepare a PJS which addresses the following in numeric format:

447

Statement of Authorized Signatory Party  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Statement of Authorized Signatory Party Statement of Authorized Signatory Party (For submitting electronic certified payroll records) This form is to serve as a letter acknowledging that I, _______________________ will serve as the authorized signatory party for (Name/Title) weekly certified payroll reports for the following contract, ___________________. (Contract #/Your Company) The following personnel will be responsible for the weekly data entry of payroll reports through the electronic certified payroll system via iSupplier Portal. Please provide personnel name, title, email address and designated role (see below for explanation): ________________ _____________ ________________ _____________ (Name) (Title) (Email address) (Role/Responsibility)

448

Environmental Quality Improvement Act of 1970; Department of Energy NEPA Regulations & Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

F F 1325.B (8-89) EFG (07-90) United States Government Department of Energy memorandum DATE: May O8, 1995 REPLY TO ATTN OF: Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance:Borgstrom:6-4600 SUBJECT: Guidance for Si te-wide Environmental Impact Statements TO: Henry Garson, NEPA Compliance Officer Office of Defense Programs You have raised a concern that several programmatic and site-wide environmental impact statements (EISs) related to the nuclear weapons complex involve potential overlaps in scope. If not addressed appropriately, such overlaps could result in unnecessary cost, delay, and stakeholder concern regarding the Department's decision making process. In addition, given the interrelationships among proposed actions and alternatives in the programmatic and site-wide EISs, it is not clear how to cover

449

Critical Update - Renwable Guidance Update  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Renewable Update Renewable Update FUPWG May 1, 2007 Chandra Shah, National Renewable Energy Laboratory 303-384-7557, chandra_shah@nrel.gov Presentation Overview * Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 05) Federal Renewable Goal * Executive Order 13423 & Instructions * EPACT/EO Renewable Goal Guidance * Federal Renewable Use Update * Innovative Renewable Projects 3  Section 203 (a) Requirement- The President, acting through the Secretary, shall seek to ensure that, to the extent economically feasible and technically practicable, of the total amount of electric energy the Federal Government consumes during any fiscal year, the following amounts shall be renewable energy:  (1) Not less than 3% in FY07-09  (2) Not less than 5% in FY10-FY12  (3) Not less than 7.5% in FY13 & each fiscal year thereafter.

450

Backwards maneuvering powered wheelchairs with haptic guidance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper describes a novel haptic guidance scheme that helps powered wheelchair users steer their wheelchair through narrow and complex environments. The proposed scheme encodes the local environment of the wheelchair as a set of collision-free circular ... Keywords: haptic guidance, navigation assistance, robotic wheelchair, shared control

Emmanuel B. Vander Poorten; Eric Demeester; Alexander Hntemann; Eli Reekmans; Johan Philips; Joris De Schutter

2012-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

451

STATEMENT OF GREGORY H  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

BEFORE THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM For Release on Delivery 10:00 AM Thursday, March 20, 2003 Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee, I am pleased to be here at your request to testify on the Department of Energy's (Department) contract administration activities. The Department is one of the most contractor dependent agencies in the Federal government. It places great reliance on contract operations to accomplish its mission. The basic premise of this relationship is that contractors manage the day-to-day operations, while the Department is responsible for administering the contracts to ensure that the taxpayers receive fair value for their money and that the contractors are held

452

STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Request by General Atomics Corporation for an Advance Waiver of Domestic Request by General Atomics Corporation for an Advance Waiver of Domestic and Foreign Invention Rights under subcontract No. 2047-001 between Burns and Roe Enterprises, Inc. And General Atomics under DOE Contract No. DE-AC22- 94PC92100; W(A)-97-027, CH-0932 The Petitioner, General Atomics Corporation (GAT), was awarded this subcontract from an unsolicited proposal to perform work under DOE Contract DE-AC22-94PC92100 with Bums and Roe Enterprises. The Burns and Roe contract is for the Operation, Maintenance, and Program Implementation Support Services for the Federal Energy Technology Center at Pittsburgh. This particular subcontract is for the design, construction, and operation of a pilot plant to convert uranium hexafluoride (UF 6 ) to a uranium oxide form (U3O, and UC2) and

453

STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SPX COOLING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. FOR AN ADVANCE WAIVER OF SPX COOLING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. FOR AN ADVANCE WAIVER OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN INVENTION RIGHTS UNDER DOE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. DE-NT0006549; W(A)-09-D17, CH-1481 The Petitioner, SPX Cooling Technologies, Inc. (SPX), was awarded a cooperative agreement for the performance of work entitled, "Improved Performance of an Air Cooled Condenser (ACC) Using SPX Wind Guide Technology at Coal-Based Thermoelectric Power Plants." The purpose of the cooperative agreement is the use of petitioner's Guide Technology in an existing air cooled condenser (ACC) operating at a selected coal-fired power plant. The project is aimed at reducing the efficiency variation of ACC cooling in common wind conditions. Upon installation, performance and operating parameters and data of the Guide Technology will be

454

Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Guidance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Guidance Guidance The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) provides guidance on Federal laws and regulations related to energy management. General Guidance for Facilities Overview of Federal Energy Management Policy and Mandates: Guidance document outlining Federal energy management goals and requirements for Federal energy managers. Sustainability Requirement Crosswalk: Crosswalk of sustainability and energy goals and targets within executive orders and other statutes. Guidelines Establishing Criteria for Excluding Buildings from the Energy Performance Requirements of Section 543 of the National Energy Conservation Policy Act as Amended by the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005): Guidelines that established criteria for exclusions from the energy performance requirement for a fiscal year or any Federal building or collection of Federal buildings within the statutory framework provided by the law.

455

Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) Environmental Impact Statements are detailed written statements that are required by section 102(2)(C) of NEPA for a proposed major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. If you have any trouble finding a specific document, please contact AskNEPA@hq.doe.gov for assistance. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD September 1, 1999 EIS-0222: Final Environmental Impact Statement Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington August 1, 1999 EIS-0285: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Bonneville Power Administration Transmission System Vegetation Management Program (August 1999) August 1, 1999 EIS-0289: Draft Environmental Impact Statement

456

Consolidated Financial Statements | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Reports » Consolidated Financial Statements Reports » Consolidated Financial Statements Consolidated Financial Statements December 20, 2013 Audit Report: OAS-FS-14-04 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2013 Financial Statement Audit December 12, 2013 Audit Report: OAS-FS-14-03 Department of Energy's Fiscal Year 2013 Consolidated Financial Statements December 11, 2013 Audit Report: OAS-FS-14-02 Department of Energy's Nuclear Waste Fund's Fiscal Year 2013 Financial Statement Audit November 25, 2013 Audit Report: OAS-FS-14-01 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2013 Financial Statement Audit August 12, 2013 Audit Report: OAS-FS-13-13 Southwestern Federal Power System's Fiscal Year 2012 Financial Statement Audit March 14, 2013 Audit Report: OAS-FS-13-12 Performance Audit of the Department of Energy's Improper Payment Reporting

457

Environmental Impact Statements Related Documents | National...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

2008 SWEIS (PDF, 52KB) 2008 Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement Mitigation Action Plan 2011 Annual Report (PDF, 10MB) 2008 Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement Mitigation...

458

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 98-02: DOE Enforcement Activities where  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Present Present Enforcement Guidance Supplement 98-02: DOE Enforcement Activities where Off-site Transportation Issues are also Present Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedures for Enforcement, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity to the Office of Enforcement and Investigation to issue clarifying guidance from time to time with respect to the processes used in its enforcement activities. Recently several questions have arisen regarding the scope of Price-Anderson enforcement when transportation issues are directly or indirectly involved in an incident. These questions can be separated into two areas, (1) transportation issues that involve on-site transportation typically not regulated by the Department of Transportation (DOT), and (2) transportation

459

Statement of Patricia A. Hoffman, Deputy Director of Research and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A. Hoffman, Deputy Director of Research and A. Hoffman, Deputy Director of Research and Development and Acting Chief Operating Officer, Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability, Department of Energy before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources United States Statement of Patricia A. Hoffman, Deputy Director of Research and Development and Acting Chief Operating Officer, Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability, Department of Energy before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources United States Statement of Patricia A. Hoffman, Deputy Director of R&D and Acting Chief Operating Officer. Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability, Department of Energy. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, November 6, 2007 on the nation's domestic energy sector

460

EIS-0250: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0250: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement Alignment, Construction, and Operation of a Rail Line to a Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, NV The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or the Department) announces its intent to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for the alignment, construction, and operation of a rail line for shipments of spent nuclear fuel, high-level radioactive waste, and other materials from a site near Caliente, Lincoln County, Nevada, to a geologic repository at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada. Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Alignment, Construction, and Operation of a Rail Line to a Geologic

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "guidance statement operations" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

EIS-0426: Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0426: Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement Continued Operation of the Nevada National Security Site and Off-Site Locations in the State of Nevada Abstract: This Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Continued Operation of the Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada National Security Site and Off-Site Locations in the State of Nevada (NNSS SWEIS) analyzes the potential environmental impacts of proposed alternatives for continued management and operation of the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) (formerly known as the Nevada Test Site) and other U.S. Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE/NNSA)-managed sites in Nevada, including the Remote

462

Environmental Statements, Availability, Etc., Programmatic Spent...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Energy Environmental Statements, Availability, Etc.; Programmatic Spent Nuclear Fuel Management and Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Environmental Restoration and Waste...