Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "group work plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Transportation Plan Ad Hoc Working Group | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Transportation Plan Ad Hoc Working Group Transportation Plan Ad Hoc Working Group Transportation Plan Ad Hoc Working Group More Documents & Publications Nuclear Fuel Storage and...

2

US - Brazil Binational Energy Working Group Joint Action Plan...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

US - Brazil Binational Energy Working Group Joint Action Plan US - Brazil Binational Energy Working Group Joint Action Plan brazilactionplan7202010.pdf More Documents &...

3

Work Plan - U.S.-India Coal Working Group | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Work Plan - U.S.-India Coal Working Group Work Plan - U.S.-India Coal Working Group Work Plan - U.S.-India Coal Working Group More Documents & Publications Work Group Telecom...

4

2012 Bioenergy Action Plan Prepared by the Bioenergy Interagency Working Group  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

2012 Bioenergy Action Plan Prepared by the Bioenergy Interagency Working Group AUGUST 2012 Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor #12;Bioenergy Interagency Working Group Julia Levin, Chair, Bioenergy Interagency and the California Energy Commission with input from the Bioenergy Interagency Working Group. This report

5

R&D Plan for the High Temperature Membrane Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Plan for the Plan for the High Temperature Membrane Working Group Introduction/Background The High Temperature Membrane Working Group was established to provide a forum for greater interaction in the effort to develop high temperature membranes for PEM fuel cells. The goal of this effort is particularly challenging and requires significant fundamental research and development. The Working Group meets twice a year (immediately before or after the Electrochemical Society meeting) and includes universities, national labs, small business and industry and is open to any interested individual/organization. The first meeting was in October, 2000. Working Group members are listed in Appendix A. This plan was developed to guide the R&D activities of the Working Group. The

6

Long Range Plan Working Group Members | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Long Range Plan Working Group Members Long Range Plan Working Group Members Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) NSAC Home Meetings Members Charges/Reports Charter .pdf file (629KB) NP Committees of Visitors NP Home Members Long Range Plan Working Group Members Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Baker, Keith Hampton University Lung, Allison JLAB Beene, Jim ORNL Marx, Jay LBNL Beise, Betsy University of Maryland McLerran, Larry BNL Bland, Les Indiana University Meyer, Curtis Carnegie-Mellon Bond, Peter BNL Milner, Richard MIT Bowles, Tom LANL Moss, Joel LANL Brenner, Daeg Clark University Mueller, Al Columbia Busza, Wit MIT Mueller, Berndt Duke University Cardman, Larry JLAB Natowitz, Joe Texas A&M Casten, Rick Yale University Nazarewicz, Witek Tennessee/ORNL Cates, Gordon University of Virginia Olinto, Angela

7

2007 Long Range Plan Working Group Members | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2007 Long Range Plan Working Group Members 2007 Long Range Plan Working Group Members Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) NSAC Home Meetings Members Charges/Reports Charter .pdf file (629KB) NP Committees of Visitors NP Home Members 2007 Long Range Plan Working Group Members Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Beise, Elizabeth University of Maryland Merninga, Lia TJNAF Bryman, Douglas TRIUMF Meyer, Curtis Carnegie Mellon University Burrows, Adam University of Arizona Meziani, Zein-Eddine Temple University Cardman, Larry TJNAF Milner, Richard MIT Casten, Richard Yale University Mueller, Berndt Duke University Cates, Gordon University of Virginia Nazarewicz, Witold University of Tennessee Cizewski, Jolie Rutgers University Nitsche, Heino University of California Dean, David ORNL Norris, Margaret LBNL Deshpande, Abhay

8

QEP WORKING GROUP CHARGES Assessment Working Group  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. (Standard 2.12) During Phase I of the planning process, members of the Assessment Working Group with the institution's strategic plan, a review of the literature, definition of student learning appropriate related to goals. (Handbook for Review Committees, Standards 2.12 and 3.3.2) During Phase I

Liu, Paul

9

Management response plan for the Chemical Safety Vulnerability Working Group report. Volume 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Chemical Safety Vulnerability (CSV) Working Group was established to identify adverse conditions involving hazardous chemicals at DOE facilities that might result in fires or explosions, release of hazardous chemicals to the environment, or exposure of workers or the public to chemicals. A CSV Review was conducted in 146 facilities at 29 sites. Eight generic vulnerabilities were documented related to: abandoned chemicals and chemical residuals; past chemical spills and ground releases; characterization of legacy chemicals and wastes; disposition of legacy chemicals; storage facilities and conditions; condition of facilities and support systems; unanalyzed and unaddressed hazards; and inventory control and tracking. Weaknesses in five programmatic areas were also identified related to: management commitment and planning; chemical safety management programs; aging facilities that continue to operate; nonoperating facilities awaiting deactivation; and resource allocations. To address the facility-specific and site-specific vulnerabilities, responsible DOE and site-contractor line organizations have developed initial site response plans. These plans, presented as Volume 2 of this Management Response Plan, describe the actions needed to mitigate or eliminate the facility- and site-specific vulnerabilities identified by the CSV Working Group field verification teams. Initial site response plans are described for: Brookhaven National Lab., Hanford Site, Idaho National Engineering Lab., Lawrence Livermore National Lab., Los Alamos National Lab., Oak Ridge Reservation, Rocky Flats Plant, Sandia National Laboratories, and Savannah River Site.

Not Available

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

10

R&D Plan for the High Temperature Membrane Working Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Summary of challenges, approaches and technical targets for HFCIT's High Temperature Membrane Working Group.

11

Interagency Working Groups (IWGs)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Interagency Working Groups (IWGs) Print E-mail Interagency Working Groups (IWGs) Print E-mail Interagency Working Groups (IWGs) are the primary USGCRP vehicles for implementing and coordinating research activities within and across agencies. These groups are critical to Program integration and in assessing the Program's progress. The working groups span a wide range of interconnected issues of climate and global change, and address major components of the Earth's environmental and human systems, as well as cross-disciplinary approaches for addressing these issues. IWGs correspond to program functions and are designed to bring agencies together to plan and develop coordinated activities, implement joint activities, and identify and fill gaps in the Program's plans. They allow public officials to communicate with each other on emerging directions within their agencies, on their stakeholder needs, and on best practices learned from agency activities. Together, these functions allow the agencies to work in a more coordinated and effective manner.

12

CFN Ops Plan | Work Planning  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Operations Plan Operations Plan Work Planning & Control for Experiments and Operations All experimental work will be conducted in accordance with Work Planning and Control for Experiments and Operations, which ensures proper design and operation of all experiments prior to their commencement. CFN will use the SBMS provided standard form for the formal documentation. The Lead Experimenter/Responsible person will notify the Experimental Safety Review Committee of any new experiments or modifications to existing experiments. CFN will appoint an Experimental Safety Review Committee. This committee will consist of the Experiment Review Coordinator, CFN personnel, Facility Support Representative (FSR), Environmental Compliance Representative (ECR). Additional subject matter experts may be appointed on an ad-hoc

13

21st Century jobs initiative - building the foundations for a 21st Century economy. Appendix A, cluster working group initiative business plans  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The business and community leaders who participated in a four-month long series of working groups developed business plans for initiatives which would lead to further growth and competitiveness of each of the industrial clusters. This appendix contains those business plans as they stood at the end of the working group session mid-September, 1995.

NONE

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

14

Interagency Sustainability Working Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Interagency Sustainability Working Group (ISWG) is the coordinating body for sustainable buildings in the federal government.

15

Working Group 7 Summary  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The primary subject of working group 7 at the 2012 Advanced Accelerator Concepts Workshop was muon accelerators for a muon collider or neutrino factory. Additionally, this working group included topics that did not fit well into other working groups. Two subjects were discussed by more than one speaker: lattices to create a perfectly integrable nonlinear lattice, and a Penning trap to create antihydrogen.

Nagaitsev S.; Berg J.

2012-06-10T23:59:59.000Z

16

FACT SHEET: BIOENERGY WORKING GROUP  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

, 2010 , 2010 1 FACT SHEET: BIOENERGY WORKING GROUP At the Clean Energy Ministerial in Washington, D.C. on July 19 th and 20 th , ministers launched a Bioenergy Working Group, which will advance the deployment of bioenergy technologies by implementing recommendations of the Technology Action Plan on Bioenergy Technologies that was released by the Major Economies Forum Global Partnership in December 2009. The Working Group will work in close cooperation with the Global Bioenergy Partnership (GBEP), which is co-chaired by Brazil and Italy. Initial key activities of the Working Group include: 1. Global Bioenergy Atlas: The Working Group will combine and build upon existing databases of sustainably-developed bioenergy potential around the globe and make it available in an open web-

17

Photoelectrochemical Working Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Photoelectrochemical Working Group meets regularly to review technical progress, develop synergies, and collaboratively develop common tools and processes for photoelectrochemical (PEC) water...

18

Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group of research and industry experts focuses on issues related to the cost, safety, and reliability of hydrogen pipelines. Participants represent organizations...

19

Trails Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Trails Working Group Trails Working Group Trails Working Group Our mission is to inventory, map, and prepare historical reports on the many trails used at LANL. Contact Environmental Communication & Public Involvement P.O. Box 1663 MS M996 Los Alamos, NM 87545 (505) 667-0216 Email The LANL Trails Working Group inventories, maps, and prepares historical reports on the many trails used at LANL. Some of these trails are ancient pueblo footpaths that continue to be used for recreational hiking today. Some serve as quiet and non-motorized alternatives between the Townsite and LANL or between technical areas. The Trails Working Group, established in December 2003, includes representatives from local citizen hiking groups, Los Alamos County, Forest Service, Park Service, Los Alamos National Laboratory and the NNSA Los

20

Strategic Initiatives Work Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Work Group, comprised of members representing DOE, contractor and worker representatives, provides a forum for information sharing; data collection and analysis; as well as, identifying best practices and initiatives to enhance safety performance and safety culture across the Complex.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "group work plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Mon Valley work plan  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

GWSHP 1.8 GWSHP 1.8 U.S. Department of Energy UMTRA Ground Water Project Work Plan for Characterization Activities at the Shiprock UMTRA Project Site June 1998 Prepared by U.S. Department of Energy Albuquerque Operations Office Grand Junction Office Project Number UGW-511-0020-01-000 Document Number U0013400 Work Performed under DOE Contract No. DE-AC13-96GJ87335 Note: Some of the section page numbers in the Table of Contents may not correspond to the page on which the section appears when viewing them in Adobe Acrobat. Document Number U0013400 Contents DOE/Grand Junction Office Work Plan for Characterization Activities at Shiprock Project Site June 1998 Draft Final Page v Contents Acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xi 1.0 Introduction .

22

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Catalysis Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Catalysis Working Catalysis Working Group to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Catalysis Working Group on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Catalysis Working Group on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Catalysis Working Group on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Catalysis Working Group on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Catalysis Working Group on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Catalysis Working Group on AddThis.com... Key Activities Plans, Implementation, & Results Accomplishments Organization Chart & Contacts Quick Links Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Delivery Hydrogen Storage Fuel Cells Technology Validation Manufacturing Codes & Standards Education Systems Analysis

23

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Photoelectrochemical Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

About About Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Photoelectrochemical Working Group to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Photoelectrochemical Working Group on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Photoelectrochemical Working Group on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Photoelectrochemical Working Group on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Photoelectrochemical Working Group on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Photoelectrochemical Working Group on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Photoelectrochemical Working Group on AddThis.com... Key Activities Plans, Implementation, & Results Accomplishments Organization Chart & Contacts

24

Health and Safety Work Plan for Sampling Colloids in Waste Area Grouping 5 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Work Plan/Site Safety and Health Plan (SSHP) and the attached work plan are for the performance of the colloid project at WAG 5. The work will be conducted by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Environmental Sciences Division (ESD) and associated ORNL environmental, safety, and health support groups. The purpose of this document is to establish health and safety guidelines to be followed by all personnel involved in conducting work for this project. The levels of protection and the procedures specified in this plan are based on the best information available from historical data and preliminary evaluations of the area. Therefore, these recommendations represent the minimum health and safety requirements to be observed by all personnel engaged in this project.

Marsh, J.D.; McCarthy, J.F.

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

25

Operable Unit 3-13, Group 3, Other Surface Soils Remediation Sets 4-6 (Phase II) Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan provides the framework for defining the remedial design requirements, preparing the design documentation, and defining the remedial actions for Waste Area Group 3, Operable Unit 3-13, Group 3, Other Surface Soils, Remediation Sets 4-6 (Phase II) located at the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center at the Idaho National Laboratory. This plan details the design developed to support the remediation and disposal activities selected in the Final Operable Unit 3-13, Record of Decision.

D. E. Shanklin

2006-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

26

Working Group Reports  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 5 Working Group Reports Special Working Session on the Role of Buoy Observations in the Tropical Western Pacific Measurement Scheme J. Downing Marine Sciences Laboratory Sequim, Washington R. M. Reynolds Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, New York Attending W. Clements (TWPPO) F. Barnes (TWPPO) T. Ackerman (TWP Site Scientist) M. Ivey (ARCS Manager) H. Church J. Curry J. del Corral B. DeRoos S. Kinne J. Mather J. Michalsky M. Miller P. Minnett B. Porch J. Sheaffer P. Webster M. Wesely K. Zorika G. Zhang Focus of Discussion The session convened on March 2, with brief introductions by Bill Clements. The purpose of the session was to discuss the scientific merits of retrofitting TOGA/TAO buoys with shortwave radiometers. Three questions were posed at the outset of the session to focus the discussion.

27

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Photoelectrochemical Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Photoelectrochemical Working Group Photoelectrochemical Working Group Promising PEC Materials The PEC Working Group invites the international research community to assist in the development of PEC Materials White Papers to track the research status of the most promising materials classes for solar water splitting. The Photoelectrochemical Working Group meets regularly to review technical progress, develop synergies, and collaboratively develop common tools and processes for photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting. Its members include principal investigators and supporting personnel from U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)-funded photoelectrochemical projects. More information on planned DOE photoelectrochemical activities can be found in the Multi-Year Research, Development, and Demonstration Plan.

28

STAFFREPORT Prepared for the Bioenergy Interagency Working Group  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

STAFFREPORT Prepared for the Bioenergy Interagency Working Group: Air Resources Board 2010 2009 PROGRESS TO PLAN BIOENERGY ACTION PLAN FOR CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION #12, and et. al. 2010. 2009 Progress to Plan Bioenergy Action Plan for California. California Energy

29

Working Group Report: Sensors  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Sensors play a key role in detecting both charged particles and photons for all three frontiers in Particle Physics. The signals from an individual sensor that can be used include ionization deposited, phonons created, or light emitted from excitations of the material. The individual sensors are then typically arrayed for detection of individual particles or groups of particles. Mounting of new, ever higher performance experiments, often depend on advances in sensors in a range of performance characteristics. These performance metrics can include position resolution for passing particles, time resolution on particles impacting the sensor, and overall rate capabilities. In addition the feasible detector area and cost frequently provides a limit to what can be built and therefore is often another area where improvements are important. Finally, radiation tolerance is becoming a requirement in a broad array of devices. We present a status report on a broad category of sensors, including challenges for the future and work in progress to solve those challenges.

Artuso, M.; et al.,

2013-10-18T23:59:59.000Z

30

High Temperature Membrane Working Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This presentation provides an overview of the High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting in May 2007.

31

WORK PLAN FOR ENVIRONMENTAL WORK PLAN FOR ENVIRONMENTAL WORK PLAN FOR ENVIRONMENTAL  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

WORK PLAN FOR ENVIRONMENTAL WORK PLAN FOR ENVIRONMENTAL WORK PLAN FOR ENVIRONMENTAL WORK PLAN FOR ENVIRONMENTAL WORK PLAN FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION OF THE DOE MOUND RESTORATION OF THE DOE MOUND RESTORATION OF THE DOE MOUND RESTORATION OF THE DOE MOUND SITE, THE MOUND 2000 APPROACH SITE, THE MOUND 2000 APPROACH SITE, THE MOUND 2000 APPROACH SITE, THE MOUND 2000 APPROACH FEBRUARY 1999 Final (Revision 0) Department of Energy Babcock & Wilcox of Ohio Mr. Daniel Bird AICP, Planning Manager Miamisburg Mound Community Improvement Corporation 720 Mound Road Miamisburg, Ohio 45342-6714 Dear Mr. Bird: The Core Team, consisting of the U.S. Department of Energy Miamisburg Environmental Management Project (DOE-MEMP), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), and the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA), appreciates your comments on the Work

32

Work Force Retention Work Group Charter  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Work force Retention Work Group is established to support the Departments critical focus on maintaining a high-performing work force at a time when a significant number of the workers needed to support DOEs national security mission are reaching retirement age.

33

Water Resources Working Group Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Water Resources Working Group Report This report provided content for the Wisconsin Initiative in February 2011. #12;Water Resources Working Group Wisconsin Initiative on Climate Change Impacts October 2010 #12;Water Resources Working Group Members ­ WICCI Tim Asplund (Co-Chair) - Wisconsin Department

Sheridan, Jennifer

34

Renewable Energy Working Group | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Working Group Working Group Renewable Energy Working Group October 7, 2013 - 10:17am Addthis The Renewable Energy Working Group provides a forum for Federal agencies and the renewable energy industry to exchange information on existing and planned projects, lessons learned, sources of project funds, and technologies. Guidance The Renewable Energy Working Group is charged with providing guidance about renewable energy regulatory requirements. Federal Renewable Energy Requirement Guidance Under EPAct 2005 and Executive Order 13423 Transmittal Letter Summarizing the Federal Renewable Energy Requirement Guidance Members Led by the Federal Energy Management Program, the Renewable Energy Working Group is made up of more than 100 Federal agency representatives, U.S. Department of Energy programs, and the renewable energy industry.

35

Interagency Sustainability Working Group | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Interagency Sustainability Working Group Interagency Sustainability Working Group The Interagency Sustainability Working Group (ISWG) is the...

36

Transuranic Waste Transportation Working Group Agenda | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Transuranic Waste Transportation Working Group Agenda Transuranic Waste Transportation Working Group Agenda Transuranic Waste Transportation Working Group Agenda More Documents &...

37

Infrared Thermography (IRT) Working Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Infrared Thermography (IRT) Working Group Sco McWilliams U.S. Photovoltaic Manufacturing Consor;um (PVMC) Infrared Thermography Infrared Thermography (IRT) has been demonstrated...

38

Strategic Initiatives Work Group Charter  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Strategic Initiatives Work Group promote excellence and continuous improvement in the implementation of worker health and safety programs across the DOE complex.

39

High Temperature Membrane Working Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The High Temperature Membrane Working Group consists of government, industry, and university researchers interested in developing high temperature membranes for fuel cells.

40

Renewable Electricity Working Group Presentation  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Renewable Electricity Working Group Chris Namovicz, Renewable Electricity Analysis Team July 9, 2013 Agenda * Review status of AEO 2013 * Discuss new model updates and development...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "group work plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

RHIC II Science Working Groups  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Workshops Workshops The series of RHIC II Science Workshops began in November 2004, at which time seven Working Groups were initiated. These groups met in workshops through 2005, with the purpose of providing an organized forum for the community to address and describe quantitatively the most important science issues for the proposed RHIC II luminosity upgrade, and corresponding detector upgrades. Each Working Group was led by three convenors representing theory and experiment, and each has produced a detailed report (except for the "New Directions" group, which provided a sounding board and input to the other groups). The Working Group reports are linked below. The summary "white paper" document, "Future Science at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider" (PDF), is based on these reports, and was prepared by a Writing Committee that included at least one convenor from each of the Working Groups.

42

TEC Working Group Background | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Background Background TEC Working Group Background Through the TEC/WG, DOE interacted with representatives of organizations at the state, tribal, and local levels to obtain input for program needs assessment, development and management, and to enhance their capability to carry out transportation emergency preparedness and safety activities specifically related to radioactive materials shipments. TEC membership included representatives from national, state, tribal and local government organizations, labor, industry and professional groups. Members meet semiannually to participate in plenary sessions, breakout work sessions, and in more specialized Topic Groups. To learn more about the history and background of TEC, please see the following documents: TEC Charter TEC Work Plan

43

BEDES Strategic Working Group Recommendations  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The BEDES Strategic Working Group Recommendations document is a guide to how the BEDES Dictionary can be brought to market and provide the services for which it was designed.

44

DOE Catalysis Working Group Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PEMFC Performance and Durability - Jim Waldecker (Ford) 9:45 - 10:00 Degradation of Nanoparticle Pt alloy and De-alloyed Pt Catalysts - Debbie Myers (ANL) Catalysis Working Group...

45

Report of Working Group IV  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This report summarizes the discussions of the Working Group on Resource Policy and East-West Relationships that were held as part of the NATO Advance Study Institute on Deposit and Geoenvironmental Models for...

Gabor Gal; Slavko olar

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

46

Interagency Committees and Working Groups  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

DOE is actively involved with other Federal agencies that have responsibilities for the radiation protection of the public and the environment. This site provides the different committees and working groups that DOE is involved with.

47

Work Plans & Manuals | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Work Plans & Manuals Work Plans & Manuals This list contains audit and inspections manuals and a list of planned reviews to be conducted by the Office of Audits and Inspections....

48

Quality Work Plan Inspection and Monitoring Requirement  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Inspection and monitoring requirements for Weatherization Assistance Program's comprehensive Quality Work Plan.

49

Interagency Advanced Power Group, Solar Working Group: Meeting minutes  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report is the minutes of the Solar Working group. The meeting was prompted by the Steering Group`s desire to resolve issues the Solar Working Group.

Not Available

1993-10-14T23:59:59.000Z

50

PUREX facility preclosure work plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This preclosure work plan presents a description of the PUREX Facility, the history of the waste managed, and addresses transition phase activities that position the PUREX Facility into a safe and environmentally secure configuration. For purposes of this documentation, the PUREX Facility does not include the PUREX Storage Tunnels (DOE/RL-90/24). Information concerning solid waste management units is discussed in the Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application, General Information Portion (DOE/RL-91-28, Appendix 2D).

Engelmann, R.H.

1997-04-24T23:59:59.000Z

51

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Rail | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Rail Rail TEC Working Group Topic Groups Rail The Rail Topic Group has the responsibility to identify and discuss current issues and concerns regarding rail transportation of radioactive materials by the Department of Energy (DOE). The group's current task is to examine different aspects of rail transportation including inspections, tracking and radiation monitoring, planning and process, and review of lessons learned. Ultimately, the main goal for members will be to assist in the identification of potential rail routes for shipments to Yucca Mountain, in a manner that will contribute to a safe, dynamic, and flexible transportation system. The identification of potential routes from reactor sites and DOE facilities will serve as an important first step in transportation planning, examining alternative routes, and getting feedback

52

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Manual Review | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Manual Review Manual Review TEC Working Group Topic Groups Manual Review This group is responsible for the update of DOE Manual 460.2-1, Radioactive Material Transportation Practices Manual. This manual was issued on September 23, 2002, and establishes a set of standard transportation practices for U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) programs to use in planning and executing offsite shipments of radioactive materials including radioactive waste. The manual was developed in response to recommendations from various DOE programs and external stakeholders. A writing group was convened to evaluate the shipping practices being used or planned for use throughout the Department, document them, and, where appropriate, standardize them. The results of this effort are reflected

53

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Transport Modeling Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Transport Modeling Transport Modeling Working Group to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Transport Modeling Working Group on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Transport Modeling Working Group on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Transport Modeling Working Group on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Transport Modeling Working Group on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Transport Modeling Working Group on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Transport Modeling Working Group on AddThis.com... Key Activities Plans, Implementation, & Results Accomplishments Organization Chart & Contacts Quick Links Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Delivery Hydrogen Storage Fuel Cells Technology Validation

54

Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Renewable Energy Renewable Energy Working Group to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group on AddThis.com... Energy-Efficient Products Technology Deployment Renewable Energy Federal Requirements Renewable Resources & Technologies Project Planning & Implementation Project Assistance Resource Maps & Screening Tools

55

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Water Electrolysis Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Water Electrolysis Water Electrolysis Working Group to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Water Electrolysis Working Group on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Water Electrolysis Working Group on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Water Electrolysis Working Group on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Water Electrolysis Working Group on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Water Electrolysis Working Group on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Water Electrolysis Working Group on AddThis.com... Key Activities Plans, Implementation, & Results Accomplishments Organization Chart & Contacts Quick Links Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Delivery Hydrogen Storage Fuel Cells Technology Validation

56

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Catalysis Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Catalysis Working Group Catalysis Working Group The Catalysis Working Group (CWG) meets twice per year to exchange information, create synergies, and collaboratively develop both an understanding of and tools for studying electrocatalysis for polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs) and other low- and intermediate-temperature fuel cell systems, including direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs), alkaline fuel cells (AFCs), alkaline membrane fuel cells (AMFCs), and phosphoric acid fuel cells (PAFCs). The CWG members include principal and co-principal investigators in electrocatalysis projects funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), as well as supporting DOE personnel. More information on DOE electrocatalysis activities can be found in the Multi-Year Research, Development, and Demonstration Plan.

57

Annual work plan for FY 1990  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Office of Inspector General (OIG) has an overall mission to prevent and detect fraud, waste, and mismanagement in Department of Energy (DOE) programs. As part of its responsibility in accomplishing its mission, the DOE Office of Audits publishes an Annual Work Plan'' in September of each year. The prime focus of the plan is to identify opportunities for audits to enhance the effectiveness, efficiency, and integrity of the DOE's programs and operations. Through this plan, we are able to maximize the effectiveness of our resources and to avoid duplicating audit coverage being provided by other audit groups, such as the US General Accounting Office (GAO) to US Department of Energy programs. Such planning is required by Office of Management and Budget Circular A-73 and DOE Order 2321.1. This work plan, in an effort to more realistically plan the year ahead, moves away from the traditional listing of all audits to be undertaken for the year. Only those audits that are to be carried over from the previous fiscal year and those that are to be started in the first quarter of the new fiscal year will be listed. The balance of time available has been allocated to the major program areas for FY 1990, and new audits will be identified and started during the year based on the knowledge gained from completed or in-process audits. This process represents the beginning of our use of long-term multi-year program strategies.

Not Available

1989-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

58

September 8, 2011, HSS/Union Focus Group Work Group Telecom - Work Group Charter  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of Health, Safety and Security Focus Group [Name of Work Group] Work Group Charter (Date) I. PURPOSE The HSS Focus Group [Name of Work Group] is one of several HSS Work Groups, established to address worker health, safety and security programs improvements across the U.S. Department of Energy Complex. The [Name of Work Group] has been established to (state specific purpose). II. OBJECTIVES (State the desired impact(s) and major outcome(s) for, the Work Group) 1. Establish specific improvement goals, intended outputs and supporting activities that respond to identified worker health and safety improvement needs. 2. Establish measurable indicators when possible to support findings, recommendations and accomplishments.

59

Work Force Planning for Public Power Utilities  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Work Force Planning for Public Power Utilities: Ensuring Resources to Meet Projected Utilities Need to Do More to Prepare for Their Future Work Force Needs.............................................................................20 #12;ii Work Force Planning for Public Power Utilities #12;1 Work Force Planning for Public Power

60

RAP Committee 3-Month Work Plan  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

(where does this fit into the HAB FY2014 Work Plan?) Update on 100-N RIFS and Proposed Plan Rev 0; advice development o Review of recommendations of proposed plans o Draft A ...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "group work plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Intermodal Subgroup Draft Work Plan2  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 of 2 Work Plan for the DOE TEC Rail Topic Group Intermodal Sub-Group Status: Active Chair: Melissa Bailey (CSG-NE) DOE Lead: Alex Thrower (OCRWM) Contractor Support: John Smegal (Legin) Start Date: July 17, 2007 Purpose: The purpose of the Transportation External Coordinating (TEC) Working Group's Rail Topic Group (RTG) is to provide stakeholder perspectives and feedback to the Office of National Transportation (ONT) in the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) and Environmental Management (EM) regarding topics of common interest concerning operating practices, logistical constraints, and other rail-related issues affecting the development and deployment of a safe, secure, and efficient system for transporting spent fuel (SNF) and high-level radioactive waste (HLW) to a

62

Visualization and Modeling Working Group  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

During the 2005 Hurricane season, many consequence predictions were available from 36 to 96 hours before landfalls, via the Department of Energys Visualization and Modeling Working Group (VMWG). Real-time data can be tapped by local officials and utilities, and can also be accessed for post-event regulatory audits. An overview of VMWGs models, results and uses will be presented.

Fernandez, S.J. (LANL); Dodrill, K.A.

2007-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

63

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Routing | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Routing Routing TEC Working Group Topic Groups Routing ROUTING The Routing Topic Group has been established to examine topics of interest and relevance concerning routing of shipments of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high-level radioactive waste (HLW) to a national repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada by highway, rail, and intermodal operations that could involve use of barges. Ultimately, the main goal for the topic group members will be to provide stakeholder perspectives and input to the Office of Logistics Management (OLM) in the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) for the identification of a national suite of routes to Yucca Mountain. The identification of a suite of routes will provide an advanced planning framework for State and Tribal

64

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Archives Consolidated Grant Topic Group |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Consolidated Grant Topic Consolidated Grant Topic Group TEC Working Group Topic Groups Archives Consolidated Grant Topic Group The Consolidated Grant Topic Group arose from recommendations provided by the TEC and other external parties to the DOE Senior Executive Transportation Forum in July 1998. It was proposed that the consolidation of multiple funding streams from numerous DOE sources into a single grant would provide a more equitable and efficient means of assistance to States and Tribes affected by DOE nuclear material shipments. The group serves as an important vehicle for DOE senior managers to assess and incorporate stakeholder input into the development of a consolidated funding vehicle for transportation activities, should DOE implement such a program. Some of the major issues under consideration by the Consolidated Grant

65

Transportation External Coordination Working Group:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Accomplishments and Future Accomplishments and Future Transportation External Coordination Working Group Meeting Phoenix, AZ Judith A. Holm, Office of National Transportation Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management April 4, 2005 TEC MEMBER ORGANIZATIONS American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) American Nuclear Society (ANS) Association of American Railroads (AAR) Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen (BLET) Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance (CVSA) Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors, Inc. (CRCPD) Council of Energy Resource Tribes (CERT) Council of State Governments-Eastern Regional Conference (CSG-ERC) Council of State Governments-Midwestern Office (CSG-MW) Council on Radionuclides and Radiopharmaceuticals (CORAR) Dangerous Goods Advisory Council (DGAC)

66

Transportation External Coordination Working Group:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

External Coordination External Coordination Working Group: Background and Process Judith Holm National Transportation Program Albuquerque, New Mexico April 21, 2004 TEC History * DOE's Office of Environmental Management (EM) and Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) formed TEC in 1992 * EM & RW developed MOU and TEC charter in 1992 - Other DOE program offices joined in 1993-94 * Other agencies (DOT, FRA, NRC, EPA) have been active participants Meeting Locations 1992-present Some Founding Principles * TEC concept centered on unique stakeholder accountability principles - Participation by key responsible parties in technical/policy issue discussion and resolution results in increased confidence and more efficient business decisions * Ultimate goal: develop multi-year set of

67

Mixed Waste Working Group report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The treatment of mixed waste remains one of this country`s most vexing environmental problems. Mixed waste is the combination of radioactive waste and hazardous waste, as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The Department of Energy (DOE), as the country`s largest mixed waste generator, responsible for 95 percent of the Nation`s mixed waste volume, is now required to address a strict set of milestones under the Federal Facility Compliance Act of 1992. DOE`s earlier failure to adequately address the storage and treatment issues associated with mixed waste has led to a significant backlog of temporarily stored waste, significant quantities of buried waste, limited permanent disposal options, and inadequate treatment solutions. Between May and November of 1993, the Mixed Waste Working Group brought together stakeholders from around the Nation. Scientists, citizens, entrepreneurs, and bureaucrats convened in a series of forums to chart a course for accelerated testing of innovative mixed waste technologies. For the first time, a wide range of stakeholders were asked to examine new technologies that, if given the chance to be tested and evaluated, offer the prospect for better, safer, cheaper, and faster solutions to the mixed waste problem. In a matter of months, the Working Group has managed to bridge a gap between science and perception, engineer and citizen, and has developed a shared program for testing new technologies.

Not Available

1993-11-09T23:59:59.000Z

68

Training Work Group Charter | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Charter Training Work Group Charter The Training Work Group fosters improvements in the quality, efficacy, and delivery of DOE safety training, and realizes significant...

69

Program Building Committee's Central Planning Group.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Tooe ZTA245.7 8873 Y)O./3~ The Texas A&M (stem r ultural ~ion ~ervrce Damet C Plannstlel. Director College Stallon Program Building Committee's CENTRAL PLANNING GROUP 8-1344 Authors: Burl B. Richardson , Extension Program Specialist... and Mary G. Marshall, Extension Program Specialist Program -Building Committee's CENTRAL PLANNING GROUP This leaflet describes the role of the central planning group in the program development process_ The central planning group is the highest...

Richardson, Burl B.; Marshall, Mary G.

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

70

Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Working Group Working Group The Renewable Energy Working Group provides a forum for Federal agencies and the renewable energy industry to exchange information on existing and planned projects, lessons learned, sources of project funds, and technologies. Guidance The Renewable Energy Working Group is charged with providing guidance about renewable energy regulatory requirements. Federal Renewable Energy Requirement Guidance Under EPAct 2005 and Executive Order 13423 Transmittal Letter Summarizing the Federal Renewable Energy Requirement Guidance Members Led by the Federal Energy Management Program, the Renewable Energy Working Group is made up of more than 100 Federal agency representatives, U.S. Department of Energy programs, and the renewable energy industry. Meetings

71

CHARTER INDIAN COUNTRY ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORK GROUP  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CHARTER CHARTER INDIAN COUNTRY ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORK GROUP Official Designation Indian Country Energy and Infrastructure Working Group ("Working Group") Purpose The purpose of the Working Group is to provide advice and recommendations to the Director of the Office of Indian Energy Policy & Programs (OIE) and the Secretary of Energy with respect to the strategic planning and implementation of OIE's energy resource, energy business and energy infrastructure development policy and programs. Objectives and Scope of Activities and Duties The Working Group shall: (a) make recommendations to the Director of the Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs

72

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Durability Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Durability Working Group Durability Working Group The Durability Working Group meets twice per year to exchange information, create synergies, and collaboratively develop both an understanding of and tools for studying degradation mechanisms of polymer electrolyte fuel cell stacks. Its members include principle investigators and supporting personnel from U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)-funded durability projects. More information on DOE durability activities can be found in the Multi-Year Research, Development, and Demonstration Plan. Description Technical Targets Meetings Contacts Description DOE durability targets for stationary and transportation fuel cells are 40,000 hours and 5,000 hours, respectively, under realistic operating conditions. In the most demanding applications, realistic operating conditions include impurities in the fuel and air, starting and stopping, freezing and thawing, and humidity and load cycles that result in stresses on the chemical and mechanical stability of the fuel cell materials, components, and interfaces. Degradation-exacerbating conditions resulting from cyclic operation include hydrogen starvation, differential pressure imbalance, oxidation-reduction cycling, and oxygen ingress to the anode, resulting in high cathode potentials. Significant progress has been made in determining the degradation mechanisms of fuel cell components and developing improved materials. However, as stated in the 2008 DOE Fuel Cell Solicitation, there is a need for further research and development in the following areas:

73

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Security Key Documents | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TG Work Plan August 7, 2006 Security Lessons Learned Document August 2, 2006 Security Module STG Terms and Definitions from DOE 470.4 More Documents & Publications TEC Working...

74

LEDSGP/about/working-groups | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

LEDSGP/about/working-groups LEDSGP/about/working-groups < LEDSGP‎ | about Jump to: navigation, search LEDSGP Logo.png Advancing climate-resilient low emission development around the world Home About Tools Expert Assistance Events Publications Join Us About How We Work > Regional Platforms > Working Groups LEDS GP Members Steering Committee Guiding Structure Contacts Working Groups The working groups of the LEDS Global Partnership develop and deliver technical resources, training, expert assistance, and match-making. And, they engage with current topical networks and convene virtual forums. Work Stream-LEDS Planning Processes Facilitator and Process Training for Research Leads Subnational Integration of LEDS Climate Resilience Integration to LEDS Work Stream-Analysis and Tools Development Impacts Assessment Working Group

75

Climate VISION: PrivateSector Initiatives: Mining: Work Plans  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Work Plans Work Plans The National Mining Association (NMA) will lead the industry effort to produce a work plan in collaboration with DOE and EPA. The plan will include the industry's proposed implementation actions to reduce greenhouse gas emission intensity by 2012 and a schedule for achieving its commitments. The industry group, with the assistance of DOE and EPA, will implement the actions. It is anticipated that the work plan may contain four major components: Element 1: Emission measurement and reporting protocols Emission measurement and reporting protocols relate to various "Actions" of the industry group's Climate VISION letter of intent. Element 2: Identify/implement near-term, cost-effective opportunities The identification and implementation of near-term, cost-effective actions

76

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Archives Communications Conference...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Communications Conference Call Summaries TEC Working Group Topic Groups Archives Communications Conference Call Summaries Conference Call Summaries Conference Call Summary April...

77

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Routing Conference Call Summaries...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Routing Conference Call Summaries TEC Working Group Topic Groups Routing Conference Call Summaries CONFERENCE CALL SUMMARIES January 31, 2008 December 6, 2007 October 4, 2007...

78

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Security Conference Call Summaries...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Security Conference Call Summaries TEC Working Group Topic Groups Security Conference Call Summaries Conference Call Summaries August 17, 2006 (Draft) July 18, 2006 (Draft) June...

79

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Archives Protocols Conference...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Conference Call Summaries TEC Working Group Topic Groups Archives Protocols Conference Call Summaries Conference Call Summaries May 13, 1999 April 8, 1999 March 1, 1999 More...

80

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Security Meeting Summaries | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Summaries TEC Working Group Topic Groups Security Meeting Summaries Meeting Summaries Green Bay STG Meeting Summary- September 14, 2006 Washington STG Meeting Summary - March 14,...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "group work plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FALL PROTECTION WORK PLAN  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FALL PROTECTION WORK PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY This Work Plan Environmental Health and Safety, 206-543-0469 Call: or Seattle Fire Department 9-911 Radio Communication Center skylights, window cleaning. PROTECTION METHODS Specify protection methods for workers exposed to fall hazard

Wilcock, William

82

Transportation Protocols Working Group First Conference Call...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Call March 1, 1999 Conference Call Summary The first conference call of the Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TECWG) DOE Transportation Protocols Working...

83

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) utility partners are eager to work closely with Federal agencies to help achieve energy management goals.

84

HSS Focus Group Training Work Group Meeting | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HSS Focus Group Training Work Group Meeting HSS Focus Group Training Work Group Meeting HSS Focus Group Training Work Group Meeting Meeting Dates: July 10 - 11 The Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Focus Group Training Work Group met at the DOE National Training Center (NTC) inAlbuquerque, NM on Tuesday, July 10 and Wednesday, July 11, 2012. The meeting was chaired by the Work Group co-chairs, Karen Boardman (HSS/NTC),Pete Stafford (AFL-CIO BCTD/CPWR), and Julie Johnston (EFCOG). Attachment 1 is the Meeting Agenda; Attachment 2 is a list of meeting attendees; and Attachment3 is the proposed Radworker Training Reciprocity Program. Meeting Agenda Meeting Summary Draft RAD Worker Training Reciprocity Program for Work Group v.1 Draft Radiation Worker Portability Validation

85

Training Work Group Charter | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Charter Charter Training Work Group Charter The Training Work Group fosters improvements in the quality, efficacy, and delivery of DOE safety training, and realizes significant efficiencies by minimizing redundancies across the DOE Complex. The Work Group provides a collaborative opportunity for DOE to gain insights from operating contractors, the contractor work force and their representatives, and to combine the best wisdom to assure that the most efficient and effective worker health and safety program expectations, approaches and processes are in place and are well communicated. Training Work Group Charter More Documents & Publications HSS Briefing to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) on Union Activities 10 CFR 851 Implementation Work Group Charter

86

Agenda: High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Agenda for the High Temperature Membrane Working Group (HTMWG) meeting on May 18, 2009, in Arlington, Virginia

87

Fact Sheet: Multilateral Solar and Wind Working Group | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Multilateral Solar and Wind Working Group Multilateral Solar and Wind Working Group Fact Sheet: Multilateral Solar and Wind Working Group A fact sheet detailling the development of a Multilateral Solar and Wind Working Group to promote accelerated deployment of solar and wind technologies by implementing recommendations from the MEF Technology Action Plan on Solar and Wind Technologies that was released by the Major Economies Forum Global Partnership in December 2009. The Multilateral Solar and Wind Working Group will focus its initial work on developing a Global Atlas for Solar and Wind Energy and a corresponding Long-Term Strategy on Joint Capacity Building. Fact Sheet: Multilateral Solar and Wind Working Group More Documents & Publications Renewables-Fact-Sheet.pdf Clean Energy Ministerial Press Fact Sheer

88

Working Group Report: Lattice Field Theory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This is the report of the Computing Frontier working group on Lattice Field Theory prepared for the proceedings of the 2013 Community Summer Study ("Snowmass"). We present the future computing needs and plans of the U.S. lattice gauge theory community and argue that continued support of the U.S. (and worldwide) lattice-QCD effort is essential to fully capitalize on the enormous investment in the high-energy physics experimental program. We first summarize the dramatic progress of numerical lattice-QCD simulations in the past decade, with some emphasis on calculations carried out under the auspices of the U.S. Lattice-QCD Collaboration, and describe a broad program of lattice-QCD calculations that will be relevant for future experiments at the intensity and energy frontiers. We then present details of the computational hardware and software resources needed to undertake these calculations.

Blum, T.; et al.,

2013-10-22T23:59:59.000Z

89

HSS Focus Group Training Work Group Meeting | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Training Work Group Meeting Training Work Group Meeting HSS Focus Group Training Work Group Meeting Meeting Dates: July 10 - 11 The Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Focus Group Training Work Group met at the DOE National Training Center (NTC) inAlbuquerque, NM on Tuesday, July 10 and Wednesday, July 11, 2012. The meeting was chaired by the Work Group co-chairs, Karen Boardman (HSS/NTC),Pete Stafford (AFL-CIO BCTD/CPWR), and Julie Johnston (EFCOG). Attachment 1 is the Meeting Agenda; Attachment 2 is a list of meeting attendees; and Attachment3 is the proposed Radworker Training Reciprocity Program. Meeting Agenda Meeting Summary Draft RAD Worker Training Reciprocity Program for Work Group v.1 Draft Radiation Worker Portability Validation Meeting Attendees

90

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Wind Working Groups  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Information Information Resources Printable Version Bookmark and Share Publications Success Stories Webinars Podcasts Videos Stakeholder Interviews Lessons Learned Wind Working Groups Economic Impact Studies Wind Turbine Ordinances Wind Working Groups Wind Powering America educates, equips, and supports state wind working groups that form strategic alliances to communicate wind's benefits and challenges to state stakeholders. State Wind Working Groups The U.S. map below shows which states have wind working groups. Click on a state to read about its wind working group. Text version of states with Wind Working Groups Alaska Arizona Arkansas Colorado Connecticut Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Kansas Kentucky Maine Massachusetts Michigan Montana Nebraska Nevada New Jersey New Mexico North Carolina

91

Transportation External Coordination Working Group:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Study of Study of DOE FY03 SNF Shipments Judith Holm National Transportation Program Albuquerque, New Mexico April 21, 2004 Background Benchmarking * The goal of benchmarking is to identify, understand, and adapt outstanding practices from organizations anywhere in the world to help your organization improve its performance * Benchmarking looks outward to find best practice and high performance and then measures actual business operations against those goals Background Best Practices * Best practices are proven solutions that represent superior performance when adapted and implemented in one's own organization. This includes processes and procedures that others are using to transport radioactive materials Background Lessons Learned * Lessons learned are "good work practices" or

92

TEC Working Group Background | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TEC Working Group Background TEC Working Group Background TEC Working Group Background Through the TEC/WG, DOE interacted with representatives of organizations at the state, tribal, and local levels to obtain input for program needs assessment, development and management, and to enhance their capability to carry out transportation emergency preparedness and safety activities specifically related to radioactive materials shipments. TEC membership included representatives from national, state, tribal and local government organizations, labor, industry and professional groups. Members meet semiannually to participate in plenary sessions, breakout work sessions, and in more specialized Topic Groups. To learn more about the history and background of TEC, please see the following documents:

93

WRAP process area development control work plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This work plan defines the manner in which the Waste Receiving and Processing Facility, Module I Process Area will be maintained under development control status. This status permits resolution of identified design discrepancies, control system changes, as-building of equipment, and perform modifications to increase process operability and maintainability as parallel efforts. This work plan maintains configuration control as these efforts are undertaken. This task will end with system testing and reissue of field verified design drawings.

Leist, K.L., Fluor Daniel Hanford

1997-02-27T23:59:59.000Z

94

TEC Working Group Topic Groups | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Topic Groups Topic Groups TEC Working Group Topic Groups TEC Topic Groups were formed in 1991 following an evaluation of the TEC program. Interested members, DOE and other federal agency staff meet to examine specific issues related to radioactive materials transportation. TEC Topic Groups enable a small number of participants to focus intensively on key issues at a level of detail that is unattainable during the TEC semiannual meetings due to time and group size constraints. Topic Groups meet individually by phone and email between TEC's semiannual general meetings, participate in conference calls and report back to the Department and TEC members. The Topic Groups are intended to work on significant issues, produce a relevant product and sunset the group when the work is

95

Focus Group Training Work Group Meeting | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2012 In conjunction with the HAMMER Steering Committee meeting the HSS Focus Group Training Working Group Meeting was conducted from 2:00 PM to 4:30 PM at the HAMMER Training...

96

FACT SHEET: MULTILATERAL SOLAR AND WIND WORKING GROUP  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FACT SHEET: MULTILATERAL SOLAR AND WIND WORKING GROUP At the Clean Energy Ministerial in Washington, D.C. on July 19 th and 20 th , ministers announced the development of a Multilateral Solar and Wind Working Group to promote accelerated deployment of solar and wind technologies by implementing recommendations from the MEF Technology Action Plan on Solar and Wind Technologies that was released by the Major Economies Forum Global Partnership in December 2009. The

97

FACT SHEET: MULTILATERAL SOLAR AND WIND WORKING GROUP  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FACT SHEET: MULTILATERAL SOLAR AND WIND WORKING GROUP At the Clean Energy Ministerial in Washington, D.C. on July 19 th and 20 th , ministers announced the development of a Multilateral Solar and Wind Working Group to promote accelerated deployment of solar and wind technologies by implementing recommendations from the MEF Technology Action Plan on Solar and Wind Technologies that was released by the Major Economies Forum Global Partnership in December 2009. The

98

DOE Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Pipeline Working Group Workshop August 31, 2005 Augusta, Georgia Hydrogen Pipeline Experience Presented By: LeRoy H. Remp Lead Project Manager Pipeline Projects ppt00 3 Hydrogen...

99

Risk Assessment Technical Experts Working Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Risk Assessment Technical Experts Working Group (RWG) was established to assist DOE in the appropriate and effective use of quantitative risk assessment in nuclear safety related activities.

100

Macro-Industrial Working Group: meeting 1  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

July 24, 2012 Macroeconomic team: Kay Smith, Russ Tarver, Elizabeth Sendich and Vipin Arora WORKING GROUP PRESENTATION FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE AS RESULTS ARE...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "group work plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Macro-Industrial Working Group: meeting 1  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

4 MacroIndustrial Working Group Macroeconomic team: Kay Smith, Russ Tarver, Elizabeth Sendich and Vipin Arora Briefing on Macroeconomic Reference Case for the Annual Energy...

102

Macro-Industrial Working Group 2  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2 Macro-Industrial Working Group Macroeconomic Analysis Team: Kay Smith, Team Leader, Elizabeth Sendich, Russ Tarver, and Vipin Aurora September 11, 2012 | Washington, DC Macro...

103

Interagency Working Groups | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

among federal agencies, utilities, and energy service companies. Interagency Sustainability Working Group (ISWG) The ISWG serves as a forum for information exchange and...

104

July 2012, Work Force Retention Work Group Status Overview  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Work Force Retention Work Group Status Overview Work Force Retention Work Group Status Overview Accomplishments: 1. Progress on the completion of the 10 CFR 1046 modifications to address barriers to workforce retention. Written response to public comment is being drafted by HS-51. 2. Pro-Force (PF) union representative, Randy Lawson, identified this accomplishment as the single most significant step toward PF workforce retention in over 20 years. 3. Draft re-charter of PF Career Options Committee (PFCOC) to establish a PF Working Group approved by GC-63 and GC NNSA. Near Term Goals and Activities: 1. Publish 1046 as a final rule - anticipated completion no later than September, assuming timely OMB review and approval. 2. Draft PF Working Group charter final review by senior management to be

105

MN471018, Work Planning and Control Manual  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

18, Work Planning and Control Manual 18, Work Planning and Control Manual Sponsor: Michael W. Hazen, 4000 Issue Date: January 3, 2007 Revision Date: June 1, 2009 This document is no longer a CPR. This document implements the requirements of Corporate procedure ESH100.1.WPC.1, Plan and Control Work. IMPORTANT NOTICE: A printed copy of this document may not be the document currently in effect. The official version is the online version located on the Sandia Restricted Network (SRN) MN471018 - WORK PLANNING AND CONTROL MANUAL Subject Matter Expert: Brad Elkin; CA Counterpart: Aden Jackson MN471018 Revision Date: June 1, 2009; Replaces Document: October 28, 2008 Implementation Notice: The requirements outlined in this document must be incorporated into approved comprehensive organizational procedures on or before June 30, 2009. New work planned and conducted after June 30, 2009 shall be performed in accordance with this document. Ongoing work, conducted under an existing, current, and approved PHS and TWD (if required), is authorized until the expiration of the applicable PHS, TWD, or June 30, 2010.

106

3.0 Work Planning and Authorization 0913  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Work Work Planning and Authorization Integrated Safety Management tells us to plan work, analyze the hazards, ensure controls are in place, and obtain authorization before starting work. There are systems in place to help you do these things. Work Planning Before starting a new project, the first step is to think about what will be needed to get the job done: * Project scope and schedule Define what you are trying to accomplish and when it needs to be done. * People How many people and what types of skills will be needed? Do you already have the right people in your work group? Human Resources and AFRD management can help you find the right people. There may be people in other AFRD programs who can help. AFRD often partners with other Divisions (Advanced Light Source, Engineering, Materials Sciences, Environmental Energy

107

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Rail Meeting Summaries | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Rail Meeting Summaries Rail Meeting Summaries TEC Working Group Topic Groups Rail Meeting Summaries MEETING SUMMARIES Kansas City TEC Meeting, Rail Topic Group Summary - July 25, 2007 Atlanta TEC Meeting, Rail Topic Group Summary - March 6, 2007 Green Bay Meeting, Rail Topic Group Summary - October 26, 2006 Washington DC TEC Meeting, Rail Topic Group Summary - March 15, 2006 Pueblo TEC Meeting, Rail Topic Group Summary - September 22, 2005 Phoenix TEC Meeting, Rail Topic Group Summary - April 4, 2005 Minneapolis TEC Meeting, Rail Topic Group Summary - September 21, 2004 Albuquerque TEC Meeting, Rail Topic Group Summary - April 22, 2004 New Orleans TEC Meeting, Rail Topic Group Summary - January 29, 2002 Jacksonville TEC Meeting, Rail Topic Group Summary - January 20, 1999 Milwaukee TEC Meeting, Rail Topic Group Summary - July 13, 1998

108

TASK PLAN: Tribal Issues Topic Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Task Plan 1 Tribal Issues Topic Group 7/12/00 Task Plan 1 Tribal Issues Topic Group 7/12/00 Task Plan 1 Page 1 Status: Active DOE Lead: National Transportation Program (NTP-AL; Judith Holm @ 505-845-4767) Start Date: January 1998 End Date: TBD Subject: TEC Topic Group - Tribal Issues rpose: To address issues such as: (1) HM-164 as it relates to Tribes; (2) to complete the Tribal column of the Rail Topic Group Regulatory Matrix; (3) to determine Tribal authority to stop and inspect shipments of radioactive materials; (4) to provide tribal pre-notification of DOE spent fuel shipments consistent with DOE policy and to provide continuous satellite-based tracking and monitoring capability to Tribes; (5) and to address Tribal involvement in transportation planning, training, and funding. The Topic Group

109

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Tribal Meeting Summaries | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Meeting Summaries Meeting Summaries TEC Working Group Topic Groups Tribal Meeting Summaries Meeting Summaries Kansas City TEC Meeting - Tribal Group Summary - July 25, 2007 Atlanta TEC Meeting - Tribal Group Summary - March 6, 2007 Green Bay TEC Meeting -- Tribal Group Summary - October 26, 2006 Washington TEC Meeting - Tribal Topic Group Summary - March 14, 2006 Pueblo TEC Meeting - Tribal Topic Group Summary, September 22, 2005 Phoenix TEC Meeting - Tribal Topic Group Summary - April 4, 2005 Albuquerque TEC Meeting - Tribal Topic Group Presentation - April 21, 2004 New Orleans TEC Meeting - Tribal Topic Group Summary - January 29, 2002 Portland TEC Meeting, Tribal Topic Group Summary - February 6, 2001 Philadelphia TEC Meeting, Tribal Topic Group Summary - July 13, 1999

110

Weatherization Assistance Program Quality Work Plan Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. Department of Energy's Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) has introduced a comprehensive Quality Work Plan (QWP) that will establish a benchmark for quality home energy upgrades. This plan defines what is required when federal dollars are used to purchase weatherization services and leverages the resources developed through the Guidelines for Home Energy Professionals project. Below you will find links to QWP guidance, as well as links to the individual requirements.

111

B Plant Complex preclosure work plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This preclosure work plan describes the condition of the dangerous waste treatment storage, and/or disposal (TSD) unit after completion of the B Plant Complex decommissioning Transition Phase preclosure activities. This description includes waste characteristics, waste types, locations, and associated hazards. The goal to be met by the Transition Phase preclosure activities is to place the TSD unit into a safe and environmentally secure condition for the long-term Surveillance and Maintenance (S&M) Phase of the facility decommissioning process. This preclosure work plan has been prepared in accordance with Section 8.0 of the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (Tri-Party Agreement) (Ecology et al. 1996). The preclosure work plan is one of three critical Transition Phase documents, the other two being: B Plant End Points Document (WHC-SD-WM-TPP-054) and B Plant S&M plan. These documents are prepared by the U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) and its contractors with the involvement of Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology). The tanks and vessels addressed by this preclosure work plan are limited to those tanks end vessels included on the B Plant Complex Part A, Form 3, Permit Application (DOE/RL-88-21). The criteria for determining which tanks or vessels are in the Part A, Form 3, are discussed in the following. The closure plan for the TSD unit will not be prepared until the Disposition Phase of the facility decommissioning process is initiated, which follows the long-term S&M Phase. Final closure will occur during the Disposition Phase of the facility decommissioning process. The Waste Encapsulation Storage Facility (WESF) is excluded from the scope of this preclosure work plan.

ADLER, J.G.

1999-02-02T23:59:59.000Z

112

Group Risk Plan (GRP) Insurance  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

sorghum, soybeans and wheat. Coverage Levels A grower selects a specific dollar amount of protection per acre and one of the five coverage levels (70, 75, 80, 85 or 90 percent). The specific dollar amount of protection per acre ranges from 60 to 100... percent of the maximum dollar amount of protection shown in the county?s actuarial table. Generally, the maximum dollar amount of protection will be 150 percent of the expected county yield, valued at the market price elected under the APH plan...

Stokes, Kenneth; Barnaby, G. A. Art; Waller, Mark L.; Outlaw, Joe

1999-06-09T23:59:59.000Z

113

Burn site groundwater interim measures work plan.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Work Plan identifies and outlines interim measures to address nitrate contamination in groundwater at the Burn Site, Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico. The New Mexico Environment Department has required implementation of interim measures for nitrate-contaminated groundwater at the Burn Site. The purpose of interim measures is to prevent human or environmental exposure to nitrate-contaminated groundwater originating from the Burn Site. This Work Plan details a summary of current information about the Burn Site, interim measures activities for stabilization, and project management responsibilities to accomplish this purpose.

Witt, Jonathan L. (North Wind, Inc., Idaho Falls, ID); Hall, Kevin A. (North Wind, Inc., Idaho Falls, ID)

2005-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

114

September 8, 2011, HSS/Union Focus Group Work Group Telecom - Work Group Guidance  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

29-11 Draft 29-11 Draft Collaboration provides an opportunity to serve as an entity that is greater than the sum of its parts. HSS FOCUS GROUP DRAFT PROPOSED WORK GROUP GUIDANCE BACKGROUND: The HSS Focus Group provides a forum for communication and collaboration related to worker health, safety and security among HSS management and staff, labor unions, DOE Programs and stakeholders. Based on the foundation that labor union representatives are an essential source of frontline perspective in identifying, addressing and resolving worker health, safety and security concerns, the Focus Group has served to open lines of communication with worker representatives and provides a vehicle for information exchange, problem solving, building relationships and trust,

115

September 2012, Work Force Retention Work Group Status Overview  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Work Force Retention Work Group Status Overview Work Force Retention Work Group Status Overview 2 Subgroups: Pro-Force and Non-Pro-Force Pro-Force Subgroup: Accomplishments: 1. Completion of 10 CFR 1046 [Protective Force Personnel Medical, Physical Readiness, Training, and Access Authorization Standards] as a final rule that includes modification efforts to address barriers to workforce retention. 2. Pro-Force (PF) union representative, Randy Lawson, identified this accomplishment as the single most significant step toward PF workforce retention in over 20 years. 3. Draft re-charter of PF Career Options Committee (PFCOC) to establish a PF Working Group approved by GC-63 and GC NNSA. Near Term Goals and Activities: 1. Publish 1046 as a final rule - publication anticipated this month.

116

July 2012, Training Work Group Status Overview  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Training Work Group Status Overview Training Work Group Status Overview Accomplishments: 1. May 7 - 8. Attended NIEHS Trainer's Exchange in Oak Ridge . 2. May 8 - 9. Joined HAMMER in visiting Oak Ridge entities to build support for the Radworker Pilot. 3. June 19-20. Joined Char Wells at Sandia (with NIEHS and HAMMER) for the Learning/Training Workshop. 2. NTC offered support for Data Warehousing at the Learning/Training Workshop. 3. Obtained EFCOG commitment to create a Human Capital Training Subgroup under the Business Management Working Group. 4. June 20 - 21. Hosted HAMMER to develop Radworker Reciprocity Program Checklist. 5. July 10-11. HSS Focus Group Training Working Group and Subcommittee meetings at NTC. Upcoming Meetings: Boardman meeting with HAMMER week of July 29.

117

Contractor Work Planning and Control URS Lessons Learned | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of Environmental Management Work Planning and Control Oversight Integration of Safety Culture Attributes into EFCOG Work Planning and Control Guidance Document Lessons...

118

ClimateWorks-Egypt-Low Carbon Growth Planning Support | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

REDIRECT ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleClimateWorks-Egypt-LowCarbonGrowthPlanningSupport&oldid553606"...

119

Quality Work Plan Guidelines and Standards Requirement | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Work Plan Guidelines and Standards Requirement an icon of a page The Weatherization Assistance Program's (WAP) comprehensive Quality Work Plan establishes a benchmark for quality...

120

Hanford Advisory Board FY2014 Work Plan - "A" List - Facilitator...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

the WIPP permits o Regulatory requirements for tank waste retrieval processing. * Work plan development (see draft ORPRL work planning list) Advice PIC, RAP, TWC Public...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "group work plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Climate VISION: Private Sector Initiatives: Magnesium: Work Plans  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Work Plans EPA's SF6 Emission Reduction Partnership for the Magnesium Industry in cooperation with the International Magnesium Association has developed a work plan for achieving...

122

Work Planning, Control and Execution | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Oversight Conclusion Work Planning, Control and Execution More Documents & Publications DOE Handbook: Implementing Activity-level Work Planning & Control at Nuclear Facilities...

123

FY 1987 current fiscal year work plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Current Year Work Plan presents a detailed description of the activities to be performed by the Joint Integration Office during FY87. It breaks down the activities into two major work areas: Program Management and Program Analysis. Program Management is performed by the JIO by providing technical planning and guidance for the development of advanced TRU waste management capabilities. This includes equipment/facility design, engineering, construction, and operations. These functions are integrated to allow transition from interim storage to final disposition. JIO tasks include program requirements identification, long-range technical planning, budget development, program planning document preparation, task guidance, task monitoring, information gathering and task reporting to DOE, interfacing with other agencies and DOE lead programs, integrating public involvement with program efforts, and preparation of program status reports for DOE. Program Analysis is performed by the JIO to support identification and assessment of alternatives, and development of long-term TRU waste program capabilities. This work plan includes: system analyses, requirements analyses, interim and procedure development, legislative and regulatory analyses, dispatch and traffic analyses, and data bases.

Not Available

1986-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

124

State & Tribal Government Working Group (STGWG) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Tribal Programs » State Tribal Programs » State & Tribal Government Working Group (STGWG) State & Tribal Government Working Group (STGWG) In April 1989, ten governors wrote a letter to then-Secretary of Energy Watkins, to express their concerns regarding the management, cleanup, and disposal of radioactive and hazardous chemical wastes at Department of Energy (DOE) facilities within or adjacent to their states boundaries. In May 1989, then-Secretary of Energy Watkins, invited each governor to appoint a representative to participate in the planning process for the Department's Five-Year Plan through membership in a State and Tribal Government Working Group (STGWG). The Secretary also invited representatives from the Yakama Indian Nation, the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, the National Governors' Association, the National Conference of State

125

ICDF Complex Remedial Action Work Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Remedial Action Work Plan provides the framework for operation of the Idaho Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Disposal Facility Complex (ICDF). This facility includes (a) an engineered landfill that meets the substantial requirements of DOE Order 435.1, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Subtitle C, Idaho Hazardous Waste Management Act, and Toxic Substances Control Act polychlorinated biphenyl landfill requirements; (b) centralized receiving, inspections, administration, storage/staging, and treatment facilities necessary for CERCLA investigation-derived, remedial, and removal waste at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) prior to final disposition in the disposal facility or shipment off-Site; and (c) an evaporation pond that has been designated as a corrective action management unit. The ICDF Complex, including a buffer zone, will cover approximately 40 acres, with a landfill disposal capacity of approximately 510,000 yd3. The ICDF Complex is designed and authorized to accept INL CERCLA-generated wastes, and includes the necessary subsystems and support facilities to provide a complete waste management system. This Remedial Action Work Plan presents the operational approach and requirements for the various components that are part of the ICDF Complex. Summaries of the remedial action work elements are presented herein, with supporting information and documents provided as appendixes to this work plan that contain specific detail about the operation of the ICDF Complex. This document presents the planned operational process based upon an evaluation of the remedial action requirements set forth in the Operable Unit 3-13 Final Record of Decision.

W. M. Heileson

2006-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

126

Energy Management Working Group: Accelerating Energy Management  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Countries participating in the Global Superior Energy Performance (GSEP) Energy Management Working Group (EMWG) are leveraging their resources and taking collective action to strengthen national and international efforts to facilitate the adoption...

Scheihing, P.

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

127

Transport Modeling Working Group Meeting Reports  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Reports from meetings of the Transport Modeling Working Group, which meets twice per year to exchange information, create synergies, share experimental and computational results, and collaboratively develop methodologies for and understanding of transport phenomena in polymer electrolyte fuel cell stacks.

128

Catalysis Working Group Meeting: June 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Agenda and presentations from the Catalysis Working Group held on June 16, 2014, in Washington, D.C., in conjunction with the DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting.

129

W Boson Mass Working Group Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The W boson mass working group discussed the current status of the W boson mass measurement and the prospects for improving on LEP and Tevatron measurements at the LHC.

Kilgore, W.; Kilgore, W.

2010-06-14T23:59:59.000Z

130

Safety Monitor Joint Working Group (JWG) Tour  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 th Meeting of the Joint Working Group of the U.S.-Japan Coordinating Committee of Fusion Energy on Safety in Inter-Institutional Collaborations (U.S.-Japan Safety Monitoring...

131

Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC) Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC) July 17-19, 2001 Cincinnati, Ohio Meeting Summary The Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC) held its 19 th semi-annual meeting July 17-19, 2001, in Cincinnati, Ohio. One hundred fifteen people attended (see Appendix A for listing of participants). Jim Carlson, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) and TEC co-chair, welcomed participants to the meeting. He then introduced Robert Owen of the Ohio Department of Health, and Jim Richter of the Cincinnati/Hamilton County Emergency Management Agency, who also made some welcoming remarks. Topic Group Meetings Tribal Issues Topic Group Issues discussed during this meeting included the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) rail safety pilot

132

10 CFR 851 Implementation Work Group Charter  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The 10 C.F.R. 851 Work Group is intended to promote excellence in the implementation of 10 C.F.R. 851, Worker Safety and Health and continuous improvement in the implementation of health and safety programs for the DOE contractor work force.

133

10 CFR 851 Implementation Work Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The 10 C.F.R. 851 Work Group promotes excellence in the implementation of 10 C.F.R. 851, "Worker Safety and Health" and continuous improvement in the implementation of health and safety programs for the DOE contractor work force.

134

Climate VISION: Private Sector Initiatives: Aluminum: Work Plans  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Work Plans The Aluminum Association has finalized its work plan with the collaboration of EPA. The plan describes actions the industry intends to take to achieve its Climate VISION...

135

September 2012, Training Work Group Status Overview  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Training Work Group Status Overview Training Work Group Status Overview Accomplishments: 1. May 7-8. Attended NIEHS Trainer's Exchange in Oak Ridge. 2. May 8-9. Joined HAMMER in visiting Oak Ridge entities to build support for the Radworker pilot. Entities visited included ORISE, Y-12, DOE TRU Project, and local labor entities. 3. June 19-20. Participated with Char Wells, Sandia National Laboratory Training Manager, (NTC, NIEHS and HAMMER in attendance) at a DOE M&O contractor led Learning/Training Workshop. - Obtained EFCOG commitment to create a Human Capital Training Subgroup under the Business Management Working Group. - Serving this group as data repository and communications hub for efforts to standardize General Employee Radiation Training (GERT) within DOE. - Briefed the complex wide Radworker reciprocity concept finding interest and

136

Records Management Working Group Charter | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Working Group Charter Records Management Working Group Charter The purpose of the Records Management Working Group (RMWG) is to provide guidance, direction, and coordination for...

137

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Archives Training - Medical Training |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Training - Medical Training Training - Medical Training TEC Working Group Topic Groups Archives Training - Medical Training The TEC Training and Medical Training Issues Topic Group was formed to address the training issues for emergency responders in the event of a radioactive material transportation incident. The Topic Group first met in 1996 to assist DOE in developing an approach to address radiological emergency response training needs and to avoid redundancy of existing training materials. The group worked with the Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program (TEPP) to review existing training material to determine its applicability, developed a front-end analysis describing an approach, and developed the Modular Emergency Response Radiological Transportation Training (MERRTT). In 1998, the Medical Training Issues

138

September 8, 2011, HSS/Union Focus Group Work Group Telecom - Work Group matrix  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Rev 09-19-11) Rev 09-19-11) Work Group / HSS and Union Leads Union/Stakeholder/HSS Participants Improvement Issues/Goals Initial/Current Tasks Outputs 10CFR 851 -Implementation -Training HSS Leads: Pat Worthington / Bill McArthur Union Lead: Doug Stephens -USW Co-Lead: Barb McCabe - IUOE TBD - BCTD Dianne Whitten - HAMTC Stan Scott - HAMMER Gary Gustafson - LIUNA Steve Simonson - HSS Tom Staker - HSS Collectively work to ensure implementation of health and safety programs (851 Rule) within and among DOE site contractors to eliminate/minimize inconsistent requirements among M&I, M&O, LLC and SBA contractors/subcontractors. - Identify leads and participants - Develop charter - Goals/ Intended Output - Develop Task Activities - HS-1 engage DOE

139

Argonne Transportation - Chinese-American Joint Working Group Meeting  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Chinese-American Olympics Planning Group Meets at Argonne National Laboratory Chinese-American Olympics Planning Group Meets at Argonne National Laboratory Argonne's Transportation Technology R&D Center recently hosted approximately 90 Chinese and American scientists and policy makers working toward the goal of creating a cleaner Beijing. The December gathering was the first American meeting of the Chinese-American Joint Working Group on Olympic Cooperation to develop sustainable technologies for the City of Beijing and the 2008 Olympic Games. Two previous meetings had been held in China. "We have already cleaned emissions from factories and cars and are planting more trees for a cleaner environment," said Vice Mayor of Beijing, Fan Baoyuan. Chinese-American Olmpics Planning Group The Joint Work Group was created about two years ago by U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), China's Ministry of Science and Technology, and Beijing Municipal Government. As part of its bid to host the 2008 Summer Games of the XXIX Olympiad, Beijing is committed to improving its environmental quality to create green Olympic Games.

140

FINAL Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC) January 28-30, 2002 New Orleans, Louisiana Meeting Summary The Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC) held its 20 th semi-annual meeting January 28-30, 2002, in New Orleans, Louisiana. This was the tenth anniversary of TEC, and 102 attendees from national, State, Tribal, and local government organizations; industry and professional groups and other interested parties in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) programs, met to address a variety of issues related to DOE's radioactive materials transportation activities. The TEC process includes the involvement of these key stakeholders in developing solutions to DOE transportation issues through their actual participation in the work product. These members provide continuing and improved

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "group work plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Transuranic Waste Transportation Working Group Agenda  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

States Energy Board States Energy Board Joint Meeting of the Radioactive Materials Transportation Committee and the Transuranic Waste Transportation Working Group The Hilton Knoxville Knoxville, Tennessee May 15, 2012 Tuesday, May 15, 2012 8:30 a.m. Breakfast 9:30 a.m. Welcome / Opening Remarks / Introductions - Christopher Wells, Southern States Energy Board - Sandra Threatt, Chair, SSEB Radioactive Materials Transportation Working Group - Elgan Usrey, Chair, SSEB Transuranic Waste Transportation Working Group 9:45 a.m. WIPP Transportation Program and National TRU Activities - Bill Mackie, Carlsbad Field Office 10:30 a.m. Break 10:45 a.m. Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance Level VI Program Update - Larry Stern, Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance

142

Interagency Sustainability Working Group | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Program Areas » Sustainable Buildings & Campuses » Interagency Program Areas » Sustainable Buildings & Campuses » Interagency Sustainability Working Group Interagency Sustainability Working Group October 4, 2013 - 5:00pm Addthis The Interagency Sustainability Working Group (ISWG) is the coordinating body for sustainable buildings in the Federal Government. The ISWG: Serves as a forum for information exchange and promotes agency implementation of goals for high-performance and sustainable buildings Develops policy and reporting guidance that fosters the widespread adoption of sustainable design and operations in the Federal sector Develops technical guidance and tools to support implementation of agency sustainability policies for Federally owned, operated, and leased buildings. The ISWG is also charged with providing assistance for implementing the

143

About the RHIC II Working Groups  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

About the Working Groups About the Working Groups The BNL Physics Department is organizing a series of meetings among theorists and experimenters from throughout the interested scientific community to focus on the central questions that will drive the next phase of RHIC physics. The November 2004 workshop was a kick-off meeting, to collect ideas and topics for future workshops, and assemble community-wide working groups. At the November workshop we had an extensive discussion of how the RHIC community should best organize itself to refine the science agenda for the next phase of RHIC research, to fully understand the science drivers for the RHIC II upgrades, and make a compelling scientific case for these upgrades to the broader nuclear physics community and to the young generation of RHIC scientists.

144

TEC Working Group Members | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Members Members TEC Working Group Members TEC members represent many different national, regional, tribal, state and local governmental, labor, industry and professional groups. To maximize the opportunity for broad-based input and information exchange, no single state, local or tribal governmental, or other entity is itself a member. Instead, membership is composed of organizations representing those perspectives. DOE programs participate in TEC by providing regular updates on key activities and provide resources and work on issues brought to the TEC by members or DOE. Members serve the group in three broad capacities: * Represent their constituent organizations; * Participate actively and consistently in TEC activities; and * Communicate the findings and recommendations of the group back to their

145

Blackout 2003: Electric System Working Group Technical Conference...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Electric System Working Group Technical Conference - Comments and Recommendations Blackout 2003: Electric System Working Group Technical Conference - Comments and Recommendations...

146

Service Improvement Group Operational Plan 2014 -2015  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Service Improvement Group Operational Plan 2014 - 2015 Version 1.0 #12;2 Introduction Universities are facing a number of challenges including financial constraints, increasing regulatory demands is accessible from the website · Review procedures and processes every six months · Assist in the development

Botea, Adi

147

Work Plan Guidelines and Standards Requirement | Department of...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Assistance Program's (WAP) comprehensive Quality Work Plan establishes a benchmark for quality home energy upgrades. The plan includes a Guidelines and Standards requirement...

148

Locally Led Conservation The Local Work Group  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Locally Led Conservation & The Local Work Group Mark Habiger NRCS #12;2 What Is "Locally Led ­ 5. Implementing solutions ­ 6. Measuring their success #12;3 The Locally Led Principle Locally led-Economic Concerns · Program Identification · Stakeholder Commitment #12;6 Who Leads the Locally Led Effort? · Local

149

Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Portland, Oregon - February 6-7, 2001 Portland, Oregon - February 6-7, 2001 Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC) February 6-7, 2001 Portland, Oregon Meeting Summary The Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC) held its 18 th semi-annual meeting February 6-7, 2001, in Portland, Oregon. Attending were 125 representatives from national, State, Tribal and local government organizations, industry and professional groups and other interested parties/DOE programs who meet to address a variety of issues related to DOE's radioactive materials transportation activities and provide continuing and improved coordination between DOE, other levels of government, and outside organizations with DOE transportation-related responsibilities. PLENARY I - TRANSCOM 2000 PRESENTATION (February 6)

150

CRAD, Work Controls Assessment Plan | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Work Controls Assessment Plan Work Controls Assessment Plan CRAD, Work Controls Assessment Plan Performance Objective: Management should have an established work control process in place with authorized, controlled and documented methods that provide an accurate status of the work to be performed. Criteria: Work planning addresses applicable laws, codes and regulations. Work planning includes operational configuration constraints; material, tool, and manpower requirements; inter-organizational coordination; operational history; special training; safety considerations; hazards protection requirements; post-maintenance testing; quality control requirements; and other considerations as necessary. The work to be accomplished is defined by identifying the existing deficiency and condition; prescribing appropriate approvals; and including

151

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop 7 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop The Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group met Sept. 25-26, 2007, to review the progress and results of DOE-sponsored pipeline research and development (R&D) projects. More than 30 researchers and industry representatives shared their research results and discussed the current challenges and future goals for hydrogen pipeline R&D. One of the Pipeline Working Group's near-term goals involves developing standardized test methods and procedures and a round-robin testing plan to ensure consistent results. The workshop featured a review of the draft plan, presentations about the DOE-funded pipeline research projects, and facilitated discussion sessions. The DOE Fuel Cell Technologies Office sponsored the workshop. It was held at the Center for Hydrogen Research in conjunction with the Materials and Components for Hydrogen Infrastructure Codes and Standards Workshop, a joint venture between the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) and Savannah River National Laboratory.

152

EM QA Working Group September 2011 Notes | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Group September 2011 Notes Meeting minutes and notes from the EM QA Working Group video conference meeting held in September 2011. EM QA Working Group September 2011 Notes...

153

Rad Monioring Subgroup Draft 1 Work Plan 020408  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 of 3 1 of 3 (Draft) Work Plan for the DOE TEC Rail Topic Group Radiation Monitoring Sub-Group Status: Active TEC Stakeholder Leads: Marty Vyenielo (PA/NE Task Force), Cort Richardson (CSG-NE) DOE Lead: Alex Thrower (OCRWM) Contractor Support: John Smegal (Legin) Start Date: October 4, 2007 Purpose: The Transportation External Coordinating (TEC) Working Group's Rail Topic Group (RTG) provides stakeholder perspectives and feedback to the Office of National Transportation (ONT) in the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) and Environmental Management (EM) regarding topics of common interest concerning operating practices, logistical constraints, and other rail-related issues affecting the development and deployment of a safe, secure, and efficient system for

154

Cloud Properties Working Group Low Clouds Update  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Cloud Properties Working Group Cloud Properties Working Group Low Clouds Update Low Clouds Update Jennifer Comstock Jennifer Comstock Dave Turner Dave Turner Andy Andy Vogelmann Vogelmann Instruments Instruments 90/150 GHz microwave radiometer 90/150 GHz microwave radiometer Deployed during COPS AMF Deployed during COPS AMF Exploring calibration w/ DPR ( Exploring calibration w/ DPR ( Crewell Crewell & & L L ö ö hnert hnert ) ) See COPS Breakout, Wednesday evening See COPS Breakout, Wednesday evening 183 GHz (GVR) deployed at the NSA 183 GHz (GVR) deployed at the NSA Neural network algorithm to retrieve PWV & LWP (Maria Neural network algorithm to retrieve PWV & LWP (Maria Cadeddu Cadeddu ) ) Potential VAP candidate (RPWG) Potential VAP candidate (RPWG)

155

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MAY 3-4, 2006 MAY 3-4, 2006 ATLANTA, GEORGIA INTRODUCTION The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) held its Spring 2006 meeting in Atlanta, Georgia, on May 3-4. A total of 77 individuals attended the meeting. Participants included officials from Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) representatives, other Federal agencies, national laboratories, the utility industry, and representatives from energy-related organizations. The working group is a joint effort between FEMP and the utility industry to stimulate the exchange of information among participants and foster energy efficiency projects in Federal facilities nationwide. The Spring 2006 FUPWG meeting was hosted by Atlanta Gas and Light. The agenda included the following presentations:

156

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 Report Page 1 of 26 3 Report Page 1 of 26 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting May 22-23, 2013 Hosted by PG&E San Francisco, CA Meeting Record The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) is a joint effort between the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) and the utility industry to stimulate the exchange of information among participants and foster energy efficiency projects in Federal facilities nationwide. The FUPWG meeting was held in San Francisco, CA on May 22-23 and was attended by 203 professionals: 52 Federal agency/lab representatives 62 utility officials 89 representatives from energy-related organizations An additional 45 professionals participated in the Wednesday morning session via webinar. This was the first time a webinar option was offered. Feedback from the participants was very positive, especially from

157

Research Highlights Sorted by Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Working Group Working Group Aerosol Life Cycle | Cloud Life Cycle | Cloud-Aerosol-Precipitation Interactions | Aerosol | Cloud Modeling | Cloud Properties | Radiative Processes Aerosol Life Cycle 2013 Bhattacharya, A. Wildfires Lead to More Warming Than Climate Models Predict, a New Mexico Fire Study Reports ASR Fast, J. . Development and Validation of a Black Carbon Mixing State Resolved Three-Dimensional Model ARM ASR Gilles, M., Moffet, R. Spectro-microscopic Measurements of Carbonaceous Aerosol Aging in Central California ARM ASR Kafle, D. N., Coulter, R. L. Micropulse Lidar-Derived Aerosol Optical Depth Climatology at ARM Sites Worldwide ARM Keppel-Aleks, G. Determining the Future of CO2 Using an Earth System Model ARM Li, Z. A Mixed Bag of Aerosols over Northeastern China ARM

158

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 Report Page 1 of 18 2 Report Page 1 of 18 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting April 11-12, 2012 Hosted by AGL Resources Jekyll Island, GA Meeting Record The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) is a joint effort between the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) and the utility industry to stimulate the exchange of information among participants and foster energy efficiency projects in Federal facilities nationwide. The FUPWG meeting held in Jekyll Island, GA, on April 11 -12 was attended by 222 professionals: * 59 utility officials * 52 federal agency representatives * 10 national laboratory representatives * 101 representatives from energy-related organizations The complete meeting participant list can be found in Appendix A and the meeting agenda in Appendix B.

159

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 Report Page 1 of 18 2 Report Page 1 of 18 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting October 16-17, 2012 Hosted by Alabama Power Mobile, Alabama Meeting Record The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) is a joint effort between the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) and the utility industry to stimulate the exchange of information among participants and foster energy efficiency projects in Federal facilities nationwide. The FUPWG meeting held in Mobile, AL, on October 16-17 was attended by 179 professionals: 55 utility officials 39 federal agency representatives 10 national laboratory representatives 75 representatives from energy-related organizations The complete meeting participant list can be found in Appendix A and the meeting agenda in Appendix B.

160

Summary of the Physics Opportunities Working Group  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Physics Opportunities Working Group was convened with the rather general mandate to explore physic opportunities that may arise as new accelerator technologies and facilities come into play. Five topics were considered during the workshop: QED at critical field strength, novel positron sources, crystal accelerators, suppression of beamstrahlung, and muon colliders. Of particular interest was the sense that a high energy muon collider might be technically feasible and certainly deserves serious study.

Chen, Pisin [Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Menlo Park, CA (United States); McDonald, K.T. [Princeton Univ., NJ (United States). Joseph Henry Labs.

1992-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "group work plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Microsoft Word - s05822_LEHR_WorkPlan  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Construction Quality Assurance Plan Construction Quality Assurance Plan This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy LEHR Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan November 2010 Doc. No. S05822-0.0 Page H-1 Construction Quality Assurance Plan 1.1 Introduction This Construction Quality Assurance Plan supports the implementation of remedial activities at LEHR covered by the Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan for the Former Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research Federal Facility University of California, Davis. This plan is consistent with and supplements the requirements of the Quality Assurance Project Plan and quality assurance elements covered in Section 7 of the Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan. 1.2 Distribution This plan shall be distributed with the Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan to all

162

2014 Quality Work Plan (QWP) Update | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 Quality Work Plan (QWP) Update 2014 Quality Work Plan (QWP) Update This update was given at the 2014 ACI National Home Performance Conference & Trade Show in Detroit, Michigan by...

163

Operational efficiency through resource planning optimization and work process improvement  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This thesis covers work done at National Grid to improve resource planning and the execution of pipeline construction and maintenance work carried out at the yards. Resource Planning, the art of picking the right jobs for ...

Balwani, Siddharth (Siddharth Vashdev)

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

164

Planning integration FY 1995 Multi-Year Program Plan (MYPP)/Fiscal Year Work Plan (FYWP)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Multi-Year Program Plan (MYPP) for the Planning Integration Program, Work Breakdown structure (WBS) Element 1.8.2, is the primary management tool to document the technical, schedule, and cost baseline for work directed by the US Department of Energy (DOE), Richland Operations Office (RL). As an approved document, it establishes a binding agreement between RL and the performing contractors for the work to be performed. It was prepared by the Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC) and the Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL). This MYPP provides a picture from fiscal year 1995 through FY 2001 for the Planning Integration Program. The MYPP provides a window of detailed information for the first three years. It also provides `execution year` work plans. The MYPP provides summary information for the next four years, documenting the same period as the Activity Data Sheets.

Not Available

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

165

DOE-EERE Durability Working Group Meeting, October 10, 2010 ...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-EERE Durability Working Group Meeting, October 10, 2010 DOE-EERE Durability Working Group Meeting, October 10, 2010 Minutes of DOE-EERE Working Group Meeting, October 10, 2010...

166

EM QA Working Group September 2011 Meeting Materials | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

PowerPoint presentations and reference material used in the EM QA Working Group video conference meeting held in September 2011. EM QA Working Group September 2011 Meeting...

167

Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop: Code for Hydrogen Pipelines...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Pipeline Working Group Workshop: Code for Hydrogen Pipelines Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop: Code for Hydrogen Pipelines Code for Hydrogen Piping and Pipelines. B31...

168

SEAB Endorsement of Office of Science Working Group | Department...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

SEAB Endorsement of Office of Science Working Group SEAB Endorsement of Office of Science Working Group This memorandum from SEAB presents the recommendation from the Task Force on...

169

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group: Atlanta Gas Light...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Group: Atlanta Gas Light Resources Federal Utility Partnership Working Group: Atlanta Gas Light Resources Presentation-given at the April 2012 Federal Utility Partnership Working...

170

Proposed Work Scope for the Rail Topic Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Proposed Task Plan for TEC Rail Topic Group Status: Active DOE Leads: Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM), Office of National Transportation, Jay Jones and Alex Thrower Start Date: September 22, 2005 Purpose: The purpose of the Transportation External Coordinating (TEC) Working Group's Rail Topic Group (RTG) is to provide stakeholder perspectives and feedback to the Office of National Transportation (ONT) in the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) regarding topics of common interest concerning operating practices, logistical constraints, and other rail- related issues affecting the development and deployment of a safe, secure, and efficient system for transporting spent fuel (SNF) and high-level radioactive waste (HLW) to a

171

April 24, 2012, HSS Focus Group Training Working Group (TWG)...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Johnston (3) Workforce Retention... Mike ArdaizJames RidleyDione Heusel - Workforce Reliability - Succession Planning - Pro-Force Longevity Jim McGeeRandy Lawson...

172

2012 Fuel Cycle MPACT Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Site Site Hydrogen Research Center 301 Gateway Drive Aiken, SC 29803 Accommodations Country Inn & Suites Aiken 3270 Whiskey Road Aiken, SC 29803 (803) 649-4024 RESERVATIONS: The cut-off date for guest room block reservations is Wednesday, February 22, 2012. We have a block of rooms reserved at this hotel at the government per diem rate of $86.00 per night. Please reference DOE -NE Fuel Cycle MPACT Working Group Meeting when making your reservations to the get the government rate. Reservations will be by individual call-in, per your institutional protocol. Here is a listing of other hotels that offer government room rates. Please note that we do not have rooms reserved at the list locations, only Country Inn & Suites in Aiken. Maps Maps to SRNL from Columbia, Aiken, and Augusta

173

DOE Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Pipeline Pipeline Working Group Workshop August 31, 2005 Augusta, Georgia Hydrogen Pipeline Experience Presented By: LeRoy H. Remp Lead Project Manager Pipeline Projects ppt00 3 Hydrogen Pipeline - Scope of Presentation Only those systems that are regulated by DOT in the US, DOT delegated state agency, or other federal regulatory authority. Cross property of third party and/or public properties for delivery to customers. Does not include in-plant or in-house hydrogen piping. Does not include piping (aboveground or underground) that delivers to a customer if all property is owned and controlled by Air Products and the customer. ppt00 4 Pipeline Photos ppt00 5 Pipeline Photos ppt00 6 Pipeline Photos ppt00 7 Pipeline Photos ppt00 8 Pipeline Photos ppt00 9 Overview of North American

174

PNNL Technology Planning and Deployment Group | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Planning and Deployment Group Planning and Deployment Group (Redirected from Technology Planning and Deployment) Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Technology Planning and Deployment Name Technology Planning and Deployment Agency/Company /Organization Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Sector Energy Website http://tpd.pnl.gov/ References Technology Planning and Development [1] "The Technology Planning & Deployment (TP&D) group is part of the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory's (PNNL's) Energy and Environment Directorate. TP&D staff provide customers with a unique combination of experience and expertise with capabilities in economics and regulatory analysis, systems engineering, marketing, technology adaptation and application, policy analysis, and project management."[1]

175

Risk Assessment Technical Expert Working Group (RWG)Conference Call  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 6, 2010 May 6, 2010 Risk Assessment Technical Expert Working Group (RWG)Conference Call Minutes, May 6, 2010 Risk Assessment Information Notice (IN): HSS provided the draft IN to safety basis experts from SNL, Y-12 and PNNL for their review and comment. Their comments were addressed and the IN is back into concurrence. 2. DNFSB Brief: HSS is coordinated with the RWG and DNFSB to schedule a DNFSB brief in June. 3. Risk Assessment Training: The National Training Center is presenting its risk assessment overview course May 18-20 at DOE headquarters. HS-20 is planning to discuss DOE's nuclear safety risk assessment study and plans for policy and guidance development at the end of the course. 4. External Risk Study: Data collection has been completed at NASA, NEI, NASA, and FDA. HS-20

176

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Seminar: Chairman's Corner  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation covers the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Seminar: Chairman's Corner from May 22, 2013.

177

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Seminar: Washington Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation covers the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Seminar: Washington Update on May 22, 2013.

178

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2005 Hydrogen Pipeline 2005 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop on AddThis.com... Publications Program Publications Technical Publications Educational Publications Newsletter Program Presentations

179

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2007 Hydrogen Pipeline 2007 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop on AddThis.com... Publications Program Publications Technical Publications Educational Publications Newsletter Program Presentations

180

Federal Energy Management Program: Interagency Sustainability Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Interagency Interagency Sustainability Working Group to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Interagency Sustainability Working Group on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Interagency Sustainability Working Group on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Interagency Sustainability Working Group on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Interagency Sustainability Working Group on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Interagency Sustainability Working Group on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Interagency Sustainability Working Group on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Basics Federal Requirements Existing Buildings New Construction & Major Renovations

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "group work plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

May 19, 2011, HSS/Union Focus Group Meeting - Draft Work Group Matrix  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

06-22-11) 06-22-11) WORK GROUPS HSS/ Union/ Stakeholder Leads Work Group Participants Improvement Issues/Goals Initial/Current Tasks Outputs 10 CFR 851 Pat Worthington CPWR USW Collectively work to ensure implementation of health and safety programs (851 Rule) within and among DOE site contractors to eliminate/minimize inconsistent requirements among M&I, M&O, LLC and SBA contractors/subcontractors. - Identify leads and participants - Develop charter - Goals/ Intended Output - Develop Task Activities - HS-1 engage DOE Corporate Implementation Bill McArthur Ensure uniformity and health and safety plans are in place and flow down among all contractors/subcontractors through oversight, communications, awareness, education and enforcement TBD

182

T2 working group summary report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The T2 Working Group has reviewed and discussed the issues and challenges of a wide range of magnet technologies: superconducting magnets using NbTi, Nb{sub 3}Sn and HTS conductor with fields ranging from 2-15 T and permanent magnets up to 4 T. The development time of these technologies varies significantly, but all are considered viable, providing an unprecedented variety of choice that can be determined by a balance of cost and application requirements. One of the most significant advances since Snowmass '96 is the increased development and utilization of Nb{sub 3}Sn. All of the current US magnet programs (BNL, FNAL, LBNL, and Texas A and M) have programs using Nb{sub 3}Sn. There are also active programs in HTS development at BNL and LBNL. A DOE/HEP sponsored program to increase the performance and reduce the cost of Nb{sub 3}Sn is in its second year. The program has already made significant advances. The current funding for this program is $500k/year and an increase to $2M has been proposed for FY02.

S. Caspi et al.

2002-11-19T23:59:59.000Z

183

Presentation to the EAC - Smart Grid Subcommittee Work Plan Status...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Electricity Advisory Committee Smart Grid Subcommittee Work Plan Status Joe Paladino - DOE Wanda Reder - EAC Smart Grid Sub- Committee Chair June 12, 2012 * Considerations: - Build...

184

WPN 15-4 Quality Work Plan Requirement Update  

Energy Savers [EERE]

WEATHERIZATION PROGRAM NOTICE 15-4 EFFECTIVE DATE: October 21, 2014 SUBJECT: Quality Work Plan Requirement Update PURPOSE: This guidance provides updates to WPN 14-4 issued...

185

Hanford Advisory Board Fiscal Year 2015 Interim Work Plan  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Advisor Nina Menard, Ecology Action: Public Involvement Presentation by DOE-RL RAP Hanford Advisory Board Fiscal Year 2015 Interim Work Plan Adopted by consensus September 5,...

186

Site Visit Report - Independent Oversight Review of Work Planning...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

representatives participate in daily work planning meetings; and instituting Conduct of Operations training for front line managers and Facility Managers. PRS also began...

187

Integration of Safety Culture Attributes into EFCOG Work Planning...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Work Planning and Control Guidance Document May 15, 2013 Presenters: Steele Coddington, NSTec, Las Vegas, and John McDonald, WRPS, Hanford Topics Covered: Integration of Safety...

188

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Transport Modeling Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Transport Modeling Working Group Transport Modeling Working Group The Transport Modeling Working Group meets twice per year to exchange information, create synergies, share experimental and computational results, and collaboratively develop methodologies for and understanding of transport phenomena in polymer electrolyte fuel cell stacks. Its members include principle investigators and supporting personnel from transport-related projects funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Learn more about DOE research activities can be found in the Multi-Year Research, Development, and Demonstration Plan. Description Technical Targets Meetings Contacts Description Fuel cell operation relies on effective mass transport of species through individual components and across the interfaces between components. Among these species are hydrogen, oxygen, water, protons, and electrons. Transport behavior is a function of operating conditions and component properties such as microstructure and surface properties. Understanding and optimizing the controlling transport phenomena are critical to the efficient and cost-effective operation of polymer electrolyte fuel cells. A better understanding of mass transport in the fuel cell, especially of water, has the potential to lead to improved designs and more efficient systems.

189

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Section 180(c) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Section 180(c) Section 180(c) TEC Working Group Topic Groups Section 180(c) Section 180(c) is a provision in the Nuclear Waste Policy Act that requires DOE to implement a program of technical and financial assistance to states for training public safety officials of appropriate units of local government and to Indian tribes through whose jurisdictions the Department plans to transport spent nuclear fuel or high-level waste to a facility authorized under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act. The training would cover both safe routine transportation and emergency response procedures. The Section 180(c) Topic Group was established to identify and address issues related to the design and implementation of the Section 180(c) grant program. The group focused on several issues, the most prominent of which

190

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) Spring 2011 Meeting Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PAGE 1 OF 18 PAGE 1 OF 18 FEDERAL UTILITY PARTNERSHIP WORKING GROUP (FUPWG) SPRING 2011 MEETING REPORT PORTLAND, OR WELCOME - MIKE WEEDALL, BPA (MJWEEDALL@BPA.GOV) * Bonneville Power serves 130+ distribution companies, or 85% of the transmission in the region in the Pacific Northwest * BPA encourages energy efficiency improvements with their customers * Agencies assisted: Army, Navy, GSA, Forest Service, National Parks o Projects completed: lighting, HVAC, controls, specific processes, building shell * Working to build sustainability plans to achieve carbon reduction goals * Efficiency has proven to be less expensive than other resources available - energy efficiency is BPA's third largest resource (viewed seriously by BPA) DAVID MCANDREW, DOE FEMP (DAVID.MCANDREW@EE.DOE.GOV)

191

US-India Energy Dialogue: Coal Working Group | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

US-India Energy Dialogue: US-India Energy Dialogue: Coal Working Group US-India Energy Dialogue: Coal Working Group On May 31, 2005, then-U.S. Secretary of Energy, Dr. Samuel W. Bodman and Dr. Montek Singh Ahluwalia, Deputy Chairman Planning Commission of India, launched a new Energy Dialogue. The Energy Dialogue builds upon the broad range of existing energy cooperation between India and the United States, as well as develops new avenues of collaboration. The Energy Dialogue includes working groups in the areas of coal, oil and gas, nuclear and renewable resources, electric power generation and energy efficiency. Read the Coal Working Group Work Plan The Coal Working Group is chaired by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Fossil Energy, and India's Ministry of Coal. The objective of the CWG

192

Project Management Plan (PMP) for Work Management Implementation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this document is to provide a project plan for Work Management Implementation by the River Protection Project (RPP). Work Management is an information initiative to implement industry best practices by replacing some Tank Farm legacy system

SHIPLER, C.E.

2000-01-13T23:59:59.000Z

193

Modeling transparency and collaborativeness in distributed work groups  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Transparency and collaborativeness are two essential features required for dependability. These two issues in social groups are not well studied. The present paper studies these two aspects in distributed work group environment such as Self Help Groups ... Keywords: SHG, collaboration, distributed work groups, self help group, transparency

A. B. Sagar

2012-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

194

EM QA Working Group September 2011 Notes  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

management expectations and will be providing the contractor information soon. Ken Armstrong noted that the records group at the EMCBC would like to participate and provide some...

195

September 13, 2012, HSS Focus Group Training Working Group (TWG) Meeting - Agenda  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 08/29/12 3 08/29/12 HSS Focus Group Training Working Group (TWG) Meeting September 13, 2012 Room 67 HAMMER 2:00 PM - 4:30 PM Time Topic Lead 2:00 p.m.  Safety Minute  Welcome and Introductions  Review of planned agenda Chairs - Pete Stafford, Julie Johnston, Karen Boardman 2:20 PM Approval of July Meeting minutes Julie Johnston 2:25 PM Report on Status of Initiatives * Rad-Worker Reciprocity Process Evan Dunne * Next Course for Pilot - Hazwoper Ted Outwater * Idaho Training Committee Evan Dunne * Work with BMAC Evan Dunne * HAZCOM GHS Gap Training Ted Giltz * GERT Training Ted Giltz 3:10 PM Safety Culture Discussion Karen Boardman, Ted Giltz 3:20 PM Actions from last meeting update * Draft letter endorsing reciprocity effort Pete Turcic

196

High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Minutes  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

membranes. He discussed the motivation for the work; electrochemistry and mechanical loads co-exist but are usually modeled separately. Additionally, there is a concern...

197

HSS Work Group Leadership Meetings: Transition Elements | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Work Group Leadership Meetings: Transition Elements Work Group Leadership Meetings: Transition Elements HSS Work Group Leadership Meetings: Transition Elements Meeting Dates: November 13 - 15, 2012 This HSS Focus Group Work Group telecom was held with the Work Group Co-Leads to discuss change elements and strategic direction to support accelerated efforts to advancing progress, productivity and performance within each of the Work Groups. Although current roles within all of the Work Groups and Focus Group efforts remain the same, the addition of centralized leadership and oversight by representatives (2) of the Departmental Representative to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board are established. Meeting Summaries 851 Implementation Meeting Summary Strategic Initiatives Meeting Summary Workforce Retention Meeting Summary

198

2014-07-08 Issuance: ASRAC Manufactured Housing Working Group...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7-08 Issuance: ASRAC Manufactured Housing Working Group; Notice of Membership 2014-07-08 Issuance: ASRAC Manufactured Housing Working Group; Notice of Membership This document is a...

199

2014-07-08 Issuance: ASRAC Regional Enforcement Working Group...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7-08 Issuance: ASRAC Regional Enforcement Working Group; Notice of Membership 2014-07-08 Issuance: ASRAC Regional Enforcement Working Group; Notice of Membership This document is a...

200

Catalysis Working Group Kick-Off Meeting Agenda  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

1 Catalysis Working Group 2012 Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting Arlington, VA - May 14, 2012 Catalysis Working Group Kick-off Meeting...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "group work plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

FY 1999 annual work plan for infrastructure program WBS 6  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Fiscal Year (FY) 1999 DynCorp Annual Work Plan (AWP) relates DOE-RL work breakdown structure (WBS) to Cost Accounts and to Organizational Structure. Each Cost Account includes a workscope narrative and justification performance and service standards, goals, and deliverables. Basis of estimates are included within each Cost Account to demonstrate the relationship of budget to defined workscope. The FY 1999 AWP reflects the planning assumptions and initiatives that are included in the PHMC Strategic Plan for Infrastructure Optimization which was established in FY 1998. Development of the FY 1999 AWP was in accordance with a sequential series of events and efforts described in the Infrastructure Annual Work Planning and Budget Cycle which was developed and established in conjunction with the Strategic Plan. The Strategic Plan covers a rolling five year span of time and is updated at the start of each fiscal year as the beginning of the annual work planning and budget cycle for the following fiscal year. Accordingly the planning for the FY 1999 AWP began in January 1998. Also included in the annual work planning and budget cycle, and the basis for the budget in this AWP, is the development of a requirements-based budget.

Donley, C.D.

1998-08-27T23:59:59.000Z

202

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting: Washington Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

U.S. Department of Energy; DOE; Federal Energy Management Program; FEMP; Federal Utility Partnership Working Group; FUPWG; Spring 2012

203

Agenda for the High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This agenda provides information about the Agenda for the High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting on September 14, 2006.

204

High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting, May 14, 2007  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This agenda provides information about the High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting on May 14, 2007 in Arlington, Va.

205

Hydrogen Delivery Pipeline Working Group Workshop September 25-26, 2007 Center for Hydrogen Research, Aiken, GA  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Hydrogen Delivery Pipeline Working Group Workshop September 25-26, 2007 Center for Hydrogen.............................................................................................................. 1 2. Pipeline Working Group Plans for Round Robin Testing and Routine Research Testing...................................................................................................... 2 3. Facilitated Discussion on Planned DOE Steel Pipeline Routine Research Testing: ASME and PWG

206

Working Group Reports Unmanned Aerospace Vehicle Workshop J. Vitko, Jr.  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Working Group Reports Unmanned Aerospace Vehicle Workshop J. Vitko, Jr. Sandia National Laboratories Livermore, California The Unmanned Aerospace Vehicle (UAV) Workshop concentrated on reviewing and refining the science experiments planned for the UAV Demonstration Flights (UDF) scheduled at the Oklahoma Cloud and Radiation Testbed (CART) in April 1994. These experiments are summarized below. UDF Experiments 1. Clear sky, daylight Scientific questions: Do models and observations agree? Under varying conditions (low/high humidity, low/high aerosols)? How accurately can we measure fluxes? What is the impact of surface "patchiness" in the visible? In the IR? At what length scales does it average out? Flight profiles: Minimum of 2 hrs centered on solar noon, clear sky, three altitude tiers, 10- to 20-km legs;

207

Working Group Report: Computing for the Intensity Frontier  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This is the report of the Computing Frontier working group on Lattice Field Theory prepared for the proceedings of the 2013 Community Summer Study ("Snowmass"). We present the future computing needs and plans of the U.S. lattice gauge theory community and argue that continued support of the U.S. (and worldwide) lattice-QCD effort is essential to fully capitalize on the enormous investment in the high-energy physics experimental program. We first summarize the dramatic progress of numerical lattice-QCD simulations in the past decade, with some emphasis on calculations carried out under the auspices of the U.S. Lattice-QCD Collaboration, and describe a broad program of lattice-QCD calculations that will be relevant for future experiments at the intensity and energy frontiers. We then present details of the computational hardware and software resources needed to undertake these calculations.

Rebel, B.; Sanchez, M.C.; Wolbers, S.

2013-10-25T23:59:59.000Z

208

Category:Wind Working Group Toolkit | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Wind Working Group Toolkit Wind Working Group Toolkit Jump to: navigation, search In 1999, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) launched the Wind Powering America (WPA) initiative to educate, engage, and enable critical stakeholders to make informed decisions about how wind energy contributes to the U.S. electricity supply. State Wind Working Groups used Wind Powering America's State Wind Working Group Handbook to serve their states, in conjunction with their own methods and outreach materials. This updated wiki-based Wind Working Group Toolkit provides links to information, methods, and resources. This wiki is a work in progress, and we welcome your contributions. See the Wind Working Group Toolkit home page for an outline of topics. Pages in category "Wind Working Group Toolkit"

209

Blue Dots Team Transits Working Group Review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Transiting planet systems offer an unique opportunity to observationally constrain proposed models of the interiors (radius, composition) and atmospheres (chemistry, dynamics) of extrasolar planets. The spectacular successes of ground-based transit surveys (more than 60 transiting systems known to-date) and the host of multi-wavelength, spectro-photometric follow-up studies, carried out in particular by HST and Spitzer, have paved the way to the next generation of transit search projects, which are currently ongoing (CoRoT, Kepler), or planned. The possibility of detecting and characterizing transiting Earth-sized planets in the habitable zone of their parent stars appears tantalizingly close. In this contribution we briefly review the power of the transit technique for characterization of extrasolar planets, summarize the state of the art of both ground-based and space-borne transit search programs, and illustrate how the science of planetary transits fits within the Blue Dots perspective.

Sozzetti, A; Alonso, R; Blank, D L; Catala, C; Deeg, H; Grenfell, J L; Hellier, C; Latham, D W; Minniti, D; Pont, F; Rauer, H

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

210

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING BSE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Campus: UMICH RG = Requirement Group  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING BSE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Campus: UMICH RG = Requirement Group Career: UENG RQ = Requirement Program: LN = Line Plan: 0880BSE Sub-Plan: RG 6856 BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING MAJOR REQUIREMENTS Effective FA05/1560 (09/06/2005) RQ 4996 Program Subjects Effective FA05/1560 (09/06/2005) LN 0010 BIOMEDE

Shyy, Wei

211

Microsoft Word - NGNP _Work Plan Final_ - 13-Dec-06 _2_.doc  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Plan December 13, 2006 December 13, 2006 Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC Contract No. 000 60209 Technical Proposal Work Plan Page - 1 AREVA NP, INC. Work Plan WORK PLAN APPROVAL...

212

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2009 High Temperature Membrane Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 High Temperature 9 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2009 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2009 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2009 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2009 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2009 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2009 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on AddThis.com...

213

PNNL Technology Planning and Deployment Group | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Deployment Group Deployment Group Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Technology Planning and Deployment Name Technology Planning and Deployment Agency/Company /Organization Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Sector Energy Website http://tpd.pnl.gov/ References Technology Planning and Development [1] "The Technology Planning & Deployment (TP&D) group is part of the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory's (PNNL's) Energy and Environment Directorate. TP&D staff provide customers with a unique combination of experience and expertise with capabilities in economics and regulatory analysis, systems engineering, marketing, technology adaptation and application, policy analysis, and project management."[1] Primary Services Building and facilities energy utilization assessments, audits,

214

Chemical Safety Vulnerability Working Group report. Volume 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Chemical Safety Vulnerability (CSV) Working Group was established to identify adverse conditions involving hazardous chemicals at DOE facilities that might result in fires or explosions, release of hazardous chemicals to the environment, or exposure of workers or the public to chemicals. A CSV Review was conducted in 148 facilities at 29 sites. Eight generic vulnerabilities were documented related to: abandoned chemicals and chemical residuals; past chemical spills and ground releases; characterization of legacy chemicals and wastes; disposition of legacy chemicals; storage facilities and conditions; condition of facilities and support systems; unanalyzed and unaddressed hazards; and inventory control and tracking. Weaknesses in five programmatic areas were also identified related to: management commitment and planning; chemical safety management programs; aging facilities that continue to operate; nonoperating facilities awaiting deactivation; and resource allocations. Volume 2 consists of seven appendices containing the following: Tasking memorandums; Project plan for the CSV Review; Field verification guide for the CSV Review; Field verification report, Lawrence Livermore National Lab.; Field verification report, Oak Ridge Reservation; Field verification report, Savannah River Site; and the Field verification report, Hanford Site.

Not Available

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

215

Working Together to Save Lives National Weather Service Strategic Plan  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Working Together to Save Lives National Weather Service Strategic Plan for 2005-2010 #12;i Preface for a broader range of environmental information services. NOAA's National Weather Service (NWS) Strategic Plan strategies, and a list of partners helping us with our activities. An appendix provides metrics NWS uses

216

September 8, 2011, HSS/Union Focus Group Work Group Telecom - Agenda  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Focus Group Focus Group HSS/Union Work Group Telecom September 8, 2011 Call-In: 301-903-0620 PROPOSED AGENDA Work Group Framework 3:00 - 4:00 pm EST Introductory Remarks...................................................Glenn Podonsky Meeting Purpose/Process..........................................Mari-Jo Campagnone Group Discussion Facilitation...............................................Pete Stafford Discussion...................................................................................All (1) Proposed Work Group Guidance (2) Proposed Charter Template (3) Work Group Matrix Next Steps..........................................Mari-Jo Campagnone/Pete Stafford Training Work Group 4:00 - 5:00 pm EST Introductory Remarks.....................................................Karen Boardman

217

Work Controls Assessment Plan Assessment Plan Assessment plan - Developed By NNSA/Nevada Site Office Facility Representative Division  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

WORK CONTROLS WORK CONTROLS Assessment Plan Developed By NNSA/Nevada Site Office Facility Representative Division Performance Objective: Management should have an established work control process in place with authorized, controlled and documented methods that provide an accurate status of the work to be performed. Criteria: Work planning addresses applicable laws, codes and regulations. Work planning includes operational configuration constraints; material, tool, and manpower requirements; inter-organizational coordination; operational history; special training; safety considerations; hazards protection requirements; post-maintenance testing; quality control requirements; and other considerations as necessary. The work to be accomplished is defined by identifying the existing

218

November 13 - 15, 2012 HSS Work Group Leadership Meeting Summary - Work Force Retention  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Work Force Retention Work Group Work Force Retention Work Group Co-Lead Telecom November 16, 2012 DRAFT Discussion Overview Purpose: This HSS Focus Group Work Group telecom was held with the Work Group Co-Leads to discuss change elements and strategic direction to support accelerated efforts to advancing progress, productivity and performance within each of the Work Groups. Although current roles within all of the Work Groups and Focus Group efforts remain the same, the addition of centralized leadership and oversight by representatives (2) of the Departmental Representative to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board are established. 1. Leadership Transition * Co-Leads will continue to provide technical functions * Functions of the Focus Group Program will remain the same. [Lily/Stephanie]

219

Microsoft Word - FY09 Work Plan_External.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

sector sector NSTB National SCADA Test Bed U.S. Department of Energy Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability DOE/OE National SCADA Test Bed Fiscal Year 2009 Work Plan (REVISED 07/31/2009) A plan of work for the National Laboratories that form the National SCADA Test Bed: Argonne National Laboratory Idaho National Laboratory Oak Ridge National Laboratory Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Sandia National Laboratories Fiscal Year 2 0 0 9 Work Plan NSTB FY 2009 Work Plan i FOREWORD The Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE) created the National SCADA Test Bed (NSTB) program with the mission to reduce the risk of energy disruptions due to cyber attack on control systems. So far the program's projects have

220

Memorandum, NNSA Activity Level Work Planning & Control Processes...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Level Work Planning & Control Processes, January 2006 More Documents & Publications DOE-HDBK-1211-2014 Order Module--DOE G 450.4-1B, INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDE CRAD,...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "group work plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Proper Sustainability: GAP Grant Proposal Work Plan Strategy Webinar  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

In this webinar I will discuss the new GAP grant requirements for tribal environmental programs and strategies for crafting a work plan that focuses on capacity building activities. My goal is to...

222

May 21, 2012, Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Focus Group Work Force Retention Work Group Charter  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Work Force Retention Work Group Charter Work Force Retention Work Group Charter In an ongoing effort to further the improvement of health, safety, environmental, and security performance within the Department, DOE is engaged in the establishment of work groups to pursue health and safety improvements across the DOE Complex. These efforts support DOE's responsibility as owner/manager to protect its greatest asset: the worker. The work groups support DOE's integrated safety management system and further DOE's best interests by fostering worker involvement and partnerships to maximize continuity of operations and the success of the Department's national security mission.

223

Indian Country Energy and Infrastructure Working Group | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Country Energy and Infrastructure Working Group Country Energy and Infrastructure Working Group Indian Country Energy and Infrastructure Working Group The Indian Country Energy and Infrastructure Working Group (ICEIWG) has been established to work collaboratively with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs to assist in surveys, analysis, and recommendations related to those program and policy initiatives required to fulfill the DOE statutory authorizations and requirements of Title V of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. About ICEIWG Secretary Steven Chu announced the creation of the Working Group in May 2011 as an initiative to establish a working group of tribal government leaders and DOE to survey, analyze, and provide feedback to the DOE on its policy and program initiatives to meet the goals and programmatic

224

WIPP Facility Work Plan for Solid Waste Management Units  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Facility Work Plan (FWP) has been prepared as required by Module VII,Section VII.M.1 of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Hazardous Waste Permit, NM4890139088-TSDF (the Permit); (NMED, 1999a). This work plan describes the programmatic facility-wide approach to future investigations at Solid Waste Management Units (SWMUs) and Areas of Concern (AOCs) specified in the Permit. This FWP addresses the current Permit requirements. It uses the results of previous investigations performed at WIPP and expands the investigations as required by the Permit. As an alternative to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Facility Investigation (RFI) specified in Module VII of the Permit, current New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) guidance identifies an Accelerated Corrective Action Approach (ACAA) that may be used for any SWMU or AOC (NMED, 1998). This accelerated approach is used to replace the standard RFI Work Plan and Report sequence with a more flexible decision-making approach. The ACAA process allows a Facility to exit the schedule of compliance contained in the Facilitys Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) permit module and proceed on an accelerated time frame. Thus, the ACAA process can be entered either before or after an RFI Work Plan. According to NMEDs guidance, a facility can prepare an RFI Work Plan or Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) for any SWMU or AOC (NMED, 1998). Based on this guidance, a SAP constitutes an acceptable alternative to the RFI Work Plan specified in the Permit. The scope of work for the RFI Work Plan or SAP is being developed by the Permittees. The final content of the RFI Work Plan or SAP will be coordinated with the NMED for submittal on May 24, 2000. Specific project-related planning information will be included in the RFI Work Plan or SAP. The SWMU program at WIPP began in 1994 under U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulatory authority. NMED subsequently received regulatory authority from EPA. A Phase I RFI was completed at WIPP as part of a Voluntary Release Assessment (VRA). The risk-based decision criteria recommended by EPA for the VRA were contained in a proposed Corrective Action rule for SWMUs (EPA, 1990). EPA Region VI has issued new risk-based screening criteria applicable to the WIPP SWMUs and AOCs.

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2000-02-25T23:59:59.000Z

225

International Technical Working Group Round Robin Tests  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The goal of nuclear forensics is to develop a preferred approach to support illicit trafficking investigations. This approach must be widely understood and accepted as credible. The principal objectives of the Round Robin Tests are to prioritize forensic techniques and methods, evaluate attribution capabilities, and examine the utility of database. The HEU (Highly Enriched Uranium) Round Robin, and previous Plutonium Round Robin, have made tremendous contributions to fulfilling these goals through a collaborative learning experience that resulted from the outstanding efforts of the nine participating internal laboratories. A prioritized list of techniques and methods has been developed based on this exercise. Current work is focused on the extent to which the techniques and methods can be generalized. The HEU Round Robin demonstrated a rather high level of capability to determine the important characteristics of the materials and processes using analytical methods. When this capability is combined with the appropriate knowledge/database, it results in a significant capability to attribute the source of the materials to a specific process or facility. A number of shortfalls were also identified in the current capabilities including procedures for non-nuclear forensics and the lack of a comprehensive network of data/knowledge bases. The results of the Round Robin will be used to develop guidelines or a ''recommended protocol'' to be made available to the interested authorities and countries to use in real cases.

Dudder, Gordon B.; Hanlen, Richard C.; Herbillion, Georges M.

2003-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

226

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 High Temperature Membrane Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

About About Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2005 High

227

International Working Group Meeting Focuses on Nuclear Power Infrastructure  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

International Working Group Meeting Focuses on Nuclear Power International Working Group Meeting Focuses on Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development and Financing of New Nuclear Projects International Working Group Meeting Focuses on Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development and Financing of New Nuclear Projects December 15, 2009 - 1:09pm Addthis VIENNA, AUSTRIA - The multi-nation Infrastructure Development Working Group (IDWG) held its fifth meeting and also a workshop on the financing of international nuclear power projects in Vienna, Austria, on December 9-10, 2009. An official from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) led the working group meeting. "As a key component of the international Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) program, the Infrastructure Development Working Group supports the safe, secure and responsible use of nuclear energy," said

228

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2004 High Temperature Membrane Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

About About Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2004 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2004 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2004 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2004 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2004 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2004 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2004 High

229

Enel North America Utah Geothermal Working Group Meeting | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Enel North America Utah Geothermal Working Group Meeting Enel North America Utah Geothermal Working Group Meeting Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library General: Enel North America Utah Geothermal Working Group Meeting Abstract Abstract unavailable. Authors John Snow and Fausto Batini Published Enel Nort America, 04/22/2008 DOI Not Provided Check for DOI availability: http://crossref.org Online Internet link for Enel North America Utah Geothermal Working Group Meeting Citation John Snow,Fausto Batini. 04/22/2008. Enel North America Utah Geothermal Working Group Meeting. Cedar City, UT. Enel Nort America. 24p. Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Enel_North_America_Utah_Geothermal_Working_Group_Meeting&oldid=680551" Categories: References Geothermal References

230

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2010 High Temperature Membrane Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

About About Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2010 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2010 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2010 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2010 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2010 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2010 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2010 High

231

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 High Temperature Membrane Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

About About Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 High Temperature Membrane Working Group Meeting Archives on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2007 High

232

DOE Durability Working Group October 2012 Meeting Agenda  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Meeting agenda from the Fall 2012 Durability Working Group Meeting sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Fuel Cell Technologies Program.

233

Security Communications Protocol Ad Hoc Working Group | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Protocol Ad Hoc Working Group More Documents & Publications Overview for Newcomers Isotope Program Transportation Shipping Radioactive Waste by Rail from Brookhaven National...

234

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting Financing Session Compilation  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation covers the Space Coast Next Generation Solar Energy Center given at the Spring 2009 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meeting in Biloxi, Mississippi.

235

Joint Working Group for Fusion Safety | Princeton Plasma Physics...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Environment, Safety & Health Environmental Management System Joint Working Group for Fusion Safety Procurement Division Technology Transfer Furth Plasma Physics Library Contact...

236

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting: Summary Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The objective of these biannual Working Group meetings is to bring together the DOE research community involved in systems analysis of hydrogen storage materials and processes.

237

November 13 - 15, 2012 HSS Work Group Leadership Meeting Summary...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Work Group improvementre-direction needs * Focus on how to get portability, standardization and quality out of the worker health and safety training much progress has...

238

DOE Durability Working Group February 2013 Meeting Agenda  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Meeting agenda from the February 2013 Durability Working Group Meeting sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Fuel Cell Technologies Office.

239

Hydrogen Storage Systems Anlaysis Working Group Meeting, December 12, 2006  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This document provides a summary of the Hydrogen Storage Systems Anlaysis Working Group meeting in December 2006 in Washington, D.C.

240

Annual Energy Outlook 2014 Electricity Working Group Meeting  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Analysis Team Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis Office of Energy Analysis WORKING GROUP PRESENTATION FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE AS...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "group work plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Annual Energy Outlook 2014: Electricity Working Group Meeting...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Electricity Analysis Team Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis Office of Energy Analysis Annual Energy Outlook 2014: Electricity Working Group Meeting July...

242

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group 2011 Meeting: Washington...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Working Group (FUPWG) meeting-provides an overview of federal government goals and status, Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) update, and utility energy services...

243

Webinar: ASRAC Commercial/Industrial Pumps Working Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

DOE is conducting a public meeting and webinar for the Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee's (ASRAC) Commercial and Industrial Pumps Working Group. For more information,...

244

Second AEO2014 Oil and Gas Working Group Meeting Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

TEAM EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION and NATURAL GAS MARKETS TEAMS SUBJECT: Second AEO2014 Oil and Gas Working Group Meeting Summary (presented September 26, 2013) Attendees: Robert...

245

PRE-DESIGN INVESTIGATION WORK PLAN FOR COLDWATER CREEK FROM  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program #12;#12;REVISION 0 PRE-DESIGN INVESTIGATION WORK PLANREVISION 0 PRE-DESIGN INVESTIGATION WORK PLAN FOR COLDWATER CREEK FROM FROST AVENUE TO ST. DENIS.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Louis District Office, Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program

US Army Corps of Engineers

246

HSS Focus and Work Group Meetings | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HSS Focus and Work Group Meetings HSS Focus and Work Group Meetings HSS Focus and Work Group Meetings As part of the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) outreach effort, the HSS Focus Group was formed in March 2007 to initiate dialogue and interface with labor unions, DOE Program Secretarial Offices, and stakeholders in areas of mutual interest and concern related to health, safety, security, and the environment. In an ongoing effort to further the improvement of health, safety, environmental, and security performance within the Department, DOE is engaged in the establishment of work groups to pursue health and safety improvements across the DOE Complex. These efforts support DOE's responsibility as owner/manager to protect its greatest asset: the worker. The work groups support DOE's integrated safety management system and

247

Risk Assessment Technical Experts Working Group (RWG) | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Risk Assessment Technical Experts Working Group (RWG) Risk Assessment Technical Experts Working Group (RWG) Risk Assessment Technical Experts Working Group (RWG) Risk Assessment Technical Experts Working Group (RWG) Welcome: The Risk Assessment Technical Experts Working Group (RWG) is established to assist DOE in the appropriate and effective use of quantitative risk assessment in nuclear safety related activities. The activities of the group will help DOE ensure that risk assessments supporting nuclear safety decisions are conducted in a consistent manner, of appropriate quality, properly tailored to the needs of the decisions they are intended to support and documented. The RWG will also assist DOE in assessing the adequacy of available risk assessment tools and guidance supporting nuclear safety at its nuclear facilities.

248

STUDENT FORUM GROUP REGISTRATION / BUDGET ALLOCATION / EVENT PLANNING  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

STUDENT FORUM ­ GROUP REGISTRATION / BUDGET ALLOCATION / EVENT PLANNING IMPORTANT DATES: SEPTEMBER 17, 2010 ­ ONLINE STUDENT GROUP REGISTRATION IS DUE! SEPTEMBER 17, 2010 ­ BUDGET ALLOCATION REQUEST IS DUE (TO RM 422) SEPTEMBER 24, 2010 ­ BUDGET ALLOCATIONS ARE DETERMINED. STUDENT GROUPS ARE NOTIFIED

249

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Rail Conference Call Summaries Rail Topic  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summaries Rail Summaries Rail Topic Group TEC Working Group Topic Groups Rail Conference Call Summaries Rail Topic Group Rail Topic Group May 17, 2007 January 16, 2007 August 31, 2006 July 27, 2006 June 8, 2006 April 20, 2006 March 9, 2006 January 26, 2006 November 9, 2005 September 15, 2005 April 28, 2005 March 24, 2005 February 24, 2005 January 27, 2005 December 16, 2004 October 28, 2004 May 17, 2004 June 2, 2003 June 26, 2002 March 26, 1999 November 13, 1998 Meeting October 6, 1998 Meeting September 11, 1998 Meeting June 22, 1998 Meeting May 27, 1998 Meeting November 3, 1997 Meeting September 18, 1997 Meeting More Documents & Publications TEC Working Group Topic Groups Routing Conference Call Summaries TEC Working Group Topic Groups Rail Meeting Summaries TEC Working Group Topic Groups Rail Conference Call Summaries Inspections

250

Microsoft Word - s05822_LEHR_WorkPlan  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Remedial Design/Remedial Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan for the Former Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research Federal Facility University of California, Davis November 2010 LMS/LEH/S05822-0.0 This page intentionally left blank LMS/LEH/S05822-0.0 Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan for the Former Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research Federal Facility University of California, Davis November 2010 This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy LEHR Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan November 2010 Doc. No. S05822-0.0 Page i Contents Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................. iii 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................1-1

251

Audience/Panel Discussion: Sites Lesson Learned about Activity-level Work Planning and Control Using EFCOG Work Planning and Control Guideline  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Slide Presentation by Donna J. Governor, Deputy Dept Mgr for Planning & Integration, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory work planning and control lessons learned and audience/panel discussion on site's lessons learned about Activity-level Work Planning and Control using EFCOG Work Planning and Control Guideline Document.

252

WIPP Facility Work Plan for Solid Waste Management Units  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This 2001 Facility Work Plan (FWP) has been prepared as required by Module VII, Section VII.M.1 of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Hazardous Waste Facility Permit, NM4890139088-TSDF (the Permit); (NMED, 1999a), and incorporates comments from the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) received on December 6, 2000 (NMED, 2000a). This February 2001 FWP describes the programmatic facility-wide approach to future investigations at Solid Waste Management Units (SWMUs) and Areas of Concern (AOCs) specified in the Permit. The permittees are evaluating data from previous investigations of the SWMUs and AOCs against the newest guidance proposed by the NMED. Based on these data, the permittees expect that no further sampling will be required and that a request for No Further Action (NFA) at the SWMUs and AOCs will be submitted to the NMED. This FWP addresses the current Permit requirements. It uses the results of previous investigations performed at WIPP and expands the investigations as required by the Permit. As an alternative to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Facility Investigation (RFI) specified in Module VII of the Permit, current NMED guidance identifies an Accelerated Corrective Action Approach (ACAA) that may be used for any SWMU or AOC (NMED, 1998). This accelerated approach is used to replace the standard RFI Work Plan and Report sequence with a more flexible decision-making approach. The ACAA process allows a Facility to exit the schedule of compliance contained in the Facilitys Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) permit module and proceed on an accelerated time frame. Thus, the ACAA process can be entered either before or after an RFI Work Plan. According to the NMED's guidance, a facility can prepare an RFI Work Plan or Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) for any SWMU or AOC (NMED, 1998). Based on this guidance, a SAP constitutes an acceptable alternative to the RFI Work Plan specified in the Permit.

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2001-02-25T23:59:59.000Z

253

RISK ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL EXPERT WORKING GROUP | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

RISK ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL EXPERT WORKING GROUP RISK ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL EXPERT WORKING GROUP RISK ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL EXPERT WORKING GROUP The Risk Assessment Technical Expert Working Group (RWG) is established to assist the Department of Energy (DOE) with the appropriate and effective use of quantitative risk assessment in nuclear safety-related activities. The activities of the group will help DOE make sure that risk assessments supporting nuclear safety decisions are: conducted in a consistent manner; of appropriate quality; properly documented; and properly tailored to the needs of the decisions they are intended to support. The RWG will also assist DOE in assessing the adequacy of available tools and guidance necessary to support nuclear safety at its nuclear facilities. RWG_Charter_March_2012.pdf

254

International Working Group Meeting Focuses on Nuclear Power Infrastructure  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Financing of New Nuclear Projects Financing of New Nuclear Projects International Working Group Meeting Focuses on Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development and Financing of New Nuclear Projects December 15, 2009 - 1:09pm Addthis VIENNA, AUSTRIA - The multi-nation Infrastructure Development Working Group (IDWG) held its fifth meeting and also a workshop on the financing of international nuclear power projects in Vienna, Austria, on December 9-10, 2009. An official from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) led the working group meeting. "As a key component of the international Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) program, the Infrastructure Development Working Group supports the safe, secure and responsible use of nuclear energy," said Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy Warren F. Miller, Jr. "The group

255

NREL: News - Solar Working Group Releases Standard Contracts  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

513 513 Solar Working Group Releases Standard Contracts NREL-organized group aims to improve access to low-cost capital November 5, 2013 A working group representing solar industry stakeholders has developed standard contracts that should help lower transaction costs and make it easier to access low-cost financing for residential and commercial solar power projects. The Solar Access to Public Capital (SAPC) working group, assembled by the Energy Department's National Renewable Energy Laboratory, is a consortium of solar energy developers, law firms, financiers and analysts with expertise in solar energy projects. The contracts cover residential leases and commercial power purchase agreements (PPAs). The working group members recognized that customizable contract templates could improve consumer transparency, increase

256

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Project Funding » Utility Energy Service Contracts » Federal Project Funding » Utility Energy Service Contracts » Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Federal Utility Partnership Working Group October 7, 2013 - 2:31pm Addthis The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) establishes partnerships and facilitates communications among Federal agencies, utilities, and energy service companies. The group develops strategies to implement cost-effective energy efficiency and water conservation projects through utility incentive programs at Federal sites. The mission and objectives of the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group are to: Enhance existing or foster new partnerships between Federal agencies and their servicing utilities to identify, develop, and implement cost-effective energy efficiency, water conservation, and renewable energy

257

GNEP Nations Hold Infrastructure Development Working Group Meeting |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

GNEP Nations Hold Infrastructure Development Working Group Meeting GNEP Nations Hold Infrastructure Development Working Group Meeting GNEP Nations Hold Infrastructure Development Working Group Meeting December 10, 2008 - 5:11pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - Representatives from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) participated this week in the third Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) Infrastructure Development Working Group (IDWG), underscoring the Department's commitment to ensuring that global expansion of civilian nuclear power is done safely and securely, while reducing the risk of nuclear proliferation and responsibly managing waste. The IDWG, held December 8th and 9th in Vienna, Austria, includes over 70 participants from 22 countries working to support the sharing of educational resources, the promotion of technical educational opportunities and the establishment of

258

GNEP Nations Hold Infrastructure Development Working Group Meeting |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

GNEP Nations Hold Infrastructure Development Working Group Meeting GNEP Nations Hold Infrastructure Development Working Group Meeting GNEP Nations Hold Infrastructure Development Working Group Meeting December 10, 2008 - 5:11pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - Representatives from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) participated this week in the third Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) Infrastructure Development Working Group (IDWG), underscoring the Department's commitment to ensuring that global expansion of civilian nuclear power is done safely and securely, while reducing the risk of nuclear proliferation and responsibly managing waste. The IDWG, held December 8th and 9th in Vienna, Austria, includes over 70 participants from 22 countries working to support the sharing of educational resources, the promotion of technical educational opportunities and the establishment of

259

Hydrgoen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting Summary Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting 2007 Hydrogen Program Annual Review Crystal Gateway Marriott, Arlington, VA May 17, 2007 SUMMARY REPORT Compiled by Romesh Kumar Argonne National Laboratory and Elvin Yuzugullu Sentech, Inc. June 28, 2007 SUMMARY REPORT Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting May 17, 2007 Crystal Gateway Marriott, Arlington, VA Meeting Objectives This meeting was one of a continuing series of biannual meetings of this Working Group. The objective of these meetings is to bring together the DOE research community involved in systems analysis of hydrogen storage materials and processes for information exchange and to update the researchers on related developments within the DOE program. A major thrust of these meetings is to leverage expertise, complement related work of different individuals and

260

Siberian Chemical Combine laboratory project work plan, fiscal year 1999  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Siberian Chemical Combine (SKhK), Laboratory Project Work Plan (Plan) is intended to assist the US Laboratory Project Team, and Department of Energy (DOE) staff with the management of the FY99 joint material protection control and accounting program (MPC and A) for enhancing nuclear material safeguards within the Siberian Chemical Combine. The DOE/Russian/Newly Independent States, Nuclear Material Task Force, uses a project work plan document for higher-level program management. The SKhK Plan is a component of the Russian Defense related Sites` input to that document. In addition, it contains task descriptions and a Gantt Chart covering the FY99 time-period. This FY99 window is part of a comprehensive, Project Status Gantt Chart for tasking and goal setting that extends to the year 2003. Secondary and tertiary levels of detail are incorporated therein and are for the use of laboratory project management. The SKhK Plan is a working document, and additions and modifications will be incorporated as the MPC and A project for SKhK evolves.

Morgado, R.E.; Acobyan, R.; Shropsire, R.

1998-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "group work plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Nuclear Materials Management and Safeguards System Working Group Charter  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

DRAFT 2011 DRAFT 2011 DRAFT 2011 Nuclear Materials Management and Safeguards System Working Group Charter VERSION: 0 REVISION DATE: May 2011 Approver Name Title Signature Date DRAFT 2011 DRAFT 2011 NMMSS Working Group Charter PURPOSE The NMMSS Working Group (NWG) serves as an open forum for discussion of issues and concerns from the NMMSS User community. The Committee will provide an interface between NMMSS users, NMMSS sponsors and the NMMSS project staff. Activities may include: Identifying user needs Identifying deficiencies in reporting capabilities Recommending upgrades to software capabilities Recommending priorities for modifications Recommending enhancements to data Minimizing the reporting burden on the reporting community

262

Working Group Report on - Space Nuclear Power Systems and Nuclear Waste  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Working Group Report on - Space Nuclear Power Systems and Nuclear Working Group Report on - Space Nuclear Power Systems and Nuclear Waste Technology R&D Working Group Report on - Space Nuclear Power Systems and Nuclear Waste Technology R&D "Even though one cannot anticipate the answers in basic research, the return on the public's investment can be maximized through long-range planning of the most promising avenues to explore and the resources needed to explore them." (p. v) "Pursuit of this goal entails developing new technologies and advanced facilities, educating young scientists, training a technical workforce, and contributing to the broader science and technology enterprise?." (p. vi) Ref:: "Nuclear Science: A Long Range Plan", DOE/NSF, Feb. 1996. The purpose of this effort is to develop the first iteration of a

263

Working Group Report on - Space Nuclear Power Systems and Nuclear Waste  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Working Group Report on - Space Nuclear Power Systems and Nuclear Working Group Report on - Space Nuclear Power Systems and Nuclear Waste Technology R&D Working Group Report on - Space Nuclear Power Systems and Nuclear Waste Technology R&D "Even though one cannot anticipate the answers in basic research, the return on the public's investment can be maximized through long-range planning of the most promising avenues to explore and the resources needed to explore them." (p. v) "Pursuit of this goal entails developing new technologies and advanced facilities, educating young scientists, training a technical workforce, and contributing to the broader science and technology enterprise?." (p. vi) Ref:: "Nuclear Science: A Long Range Plan", DOE/NSF, Feb. 1996. The purpose of this effort is to develop the first iteration of a

264

Federal Technology Deployment Working Group | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technologies » Technology Deployment » Federal Technology Technologies » Technology Deployment » Federal Technology Deployment Working Group Federal Technology Deployment Working Group October 7, 2013 - 9:11am Addthis Energy Department Announces Interagency Committee to Increase Use of Clean Energy Technologies in Federal Facilities The Senior Executive Committee for Technology Deployment, a subcommittee of the Interagency Technology Deployment Working Group, brings together leaders of technology deployment programs from across the federal government to implement the Obama Administration's comprehensive strategy to reduce energy costs in agency facilities, while boosting American competitiveness in the global clean energy race. Learn more. The Federal Technology Deployment Working Group helps Federal agencies evaluate and deploy new and underutilized technologies.

265

International Working Group Meeting Focuses on Nuclear Power Infrastructure  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Needs Needs International Working Group Meeting Focuses on Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development and Needs June 2, 2010 - 12:02pm Addthis VIENNA, Austria - The multi-nation Infrastructure Development Working Group (IDWG) of the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) held its sixth meeting on May 26-27, 2010, in Vienna, Austria. The two-day event included workshops on nuclear energy regulatory agency engagement and the infrastructure needs for international nuclear fuel service frameworks. Officials from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.K. Nuclear Decommissioning Authority co-chaired the working group meeting. "As a key component of the international Global Nuclear Energy Partnership program, the Infrastructure Development Working Group focuses

266

Meetings of the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Meetings of the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meetings of the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meetings of the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group October 7, 2013 - 2:33pm Addthis The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meets twice per year to share success stories, information on Federal Energy Management Program activities and other business. Upcoming Meetings FUPWG Winter 2014 January 14-15, 2014 (postponed from November 6-7, 2013) Golden, Colorado Co-hosted by Xcel Energy and NREL Recent Meetings FUPWG Spring 2013 May 22-23, 2013 San Francisco, California Hosted by Pacific Gas and Electric Meeting Agenda and Presentations Meeting Report FUPWG Fall 2012 October 16-17, 2012 Mobile, Alabama Hosted by Alabama Power Meeting Agenda and Presentations Meeting Report Past Meetings Notes FUPWG Spring 2012: Jekyll Island, Georgia

267

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting: Summary Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting Argonne DC Offices L'Enfant Plaza, Washington, DC December 4, 2007 SUMMARY REPORT Compiled by Romesh Kumar Argonne National Laboratory and Kristin Deason Sentech, Inc. January 16, 2008 SUMMARY REPORT Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting December 4, 2007 Argonne DC Offices, L'Enfant Plaza, Washington, DC Meeting Objectives This meeting was one of a continuing series of biannual meetings of the Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group (SSAWG). The objective of these meetings is to bring together the DOE research community involved in systems analysis of hydrogen storage materials and processes for information exchange and to update the researchers on related developments within the DOE program. A major thrust of these meetings is to leverage

268

North American Energy Work Group Releases Updated Trilateral Energy Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Work Group Releases Updated Trilateral Energy Work Group Releases Updated Trilateral Energy Report North American Energy Work Group Releases Updated Trilateral Energy Report March 2, 2006 - 11:35am Addthis WASHINGTON , D.C. - U.S. Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman today released a report entitled North America - The Energy Picture II, which continues to show that North America is one of the world's most important regions for energy - producing about one-fourth of that global energy supply and consuming about one-third of the world's commercial energy. The report was created as a joint effort under the North American Energy Working Group (NAEWG) of the trilateral Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) represented by the three countries. "This impressive report demonstrates the strength and vitality of the North

269

Transportation Protocols Working Group First Conference Call March 1, 1999  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Protocols Working Group First Conference Call March 1, 1999 Protocols Working Group First Conference Call March 1, 1999 Conference Call Summary The first conference call of the Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC/WG) DOE Transportation Protocols Working Group was held at 3:00 p.m. Eastern time on Monday March 1, 1999. The session was led by Mona Williams, DOE/NTP-Albuquerque. Other participants included Bill Lemeshewsky, DOE/RW; Ellen Ott, DOE/GC; Elizabeth Helvey, JK Research Associates; Chris Wells, SSEB; Lisa Sattler, CSG-MW, Elissa Turner, DOE/RW; Chris Wentz, New Mexico; Carl Guidice, DOE/EM; Jim Cruickshank, DOE/EM, Elmer Naples, DOE/NR; Fred Butterfield, DOE/EM; and Alex Thrower, UETC. Ms. Williams first indicated that notes from the Jacksonville meeting had been prepared and circulated for comment. She asked if there were

270

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group- Utility Interconnection Panel  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentationgiven at at the Fall 2012 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meetingdiscusses solar/photovoltaic (PV) projects to connect with utility in California and their issues.

271

Catalysis Working Group Kick-Off Meeting: May 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Information from the Catalysis Working Group kick-off meeting held May 14, 2012, in Arlington, Virginia, in conjunction with the DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting.

272

DOE-EERE Durability Working Group Meeting, October 10, 2010  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-EERE Durability Working Group Meeting October 10, 2010 Agenda 6 pm Welcome and introductory comments Debbie Myers (Argonne) and Rod Borup (Los Alamos) - co-chairs 6:15 pm...

273

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY INTERAGENCY WORKING GROUP ON MEDICAL RADIATION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of the Interagency Working Group for the practice of diagnostic radiology by Federal agencies. Since the body . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Quality Assurance Equipment Operator Performance Patient Exposure Considerations DENTAL RADIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Prescription of Dental X rays

274

Summary of Second AEO 2015 Working Group Meeting  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2016 reduction in the Investment Tax Credit from 30% to 10% resulted in the reduction in solar capacity growth post-2016. WORKING GROUP PRESENTATION FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES DO NOT...

275

Catalysis Working Group Kick-Off Meeting Agenda | Department...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Kick-Off Meeting Agenda Agenda for the kick-off meeting of the U.S. Department of Energy Fuel Cell Technologies Program's Catalysis Working Group, held May 14, 2012, in Arlington,...

276

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Participants | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Participants Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Participants Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Participants October 7, 2013 - 3:22pm Addthis The following Federal agencies have participated in the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group or engaged in a utility energy service contract project. General Services Administration National Aeronautics and Space Administration U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service Forest Service U.S. Department of Commerce U.S. Department of Defense Defense Logistics Agency U.S. Air Force U.S. Army U.S. Army National Guard U.S. Navy U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Bonneville Power Administration Federal Energy Management Program Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Pacific Northwest National Laboratory National Renewable Energy Laboratory

277

State and Tribal Government Working Group Visits the Fernald Preserve |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Fernald Fernald Preserve State and Tribal Government Working Group Visits the Fernald Preserve July 12, 2013 - 11:28am Addthis On June 4 and 5, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) hosted the State and Tribal Government Working Group (STGWG) at the Fernald Preserve in Ohio. This group-which receives support from the National Conference of State Legislatures-helps ensure that DOE facilities and sites are operated and cleaned up in compliance with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations and tribal rights. This was the STGWG's third visit to an LM site. In prior years the group visited Weldon Spring, Missouri, and Rocky Flats, Colorado. Members of the State and Tribal Government Working Group hike to the top of the On-Site Disposal Facility for full view of the Fernald Preserve.

278

Final work plan for targeted sampling at Webber, Kansas.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Work Plan outlines the scope of work for targeted sampling at Webber, Kansas (Figure 1.1). This activity is being conducted at the request of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE), in accordance with Section V of the Intergovernmental Agreement between the KDHE and the Commodity Credit Corporation of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (CCC/USDA). Data obtained in this sampling event will be used to (1) evaluate the current status of previously detected contamination at Webber and (2) determine whether the site requires further action. This work is being performed on behalf of the CCC/USDA by the Environmental Science Division of Argonne National Laboratory. Argonne is a nonprofit, multidisciplinary research center operated by the University of Chicago for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The CCC/USDA has entered into an interagency agreement with DOE, under which Argonne provides technical assistance to the CCC/USDA with environmental site characterization and remediation at its former grain storage facilities. Argonne has issued a Master Work Plan (Argonne 2002) that describes the general scope of and guidance for all investigations at former CCC/USDA facilities in Kansas. The Master Work Plan, approved by the KDHE, contains the materials common to investigations at all locations in Kansas. This document should be consulted for complete details of the technical activities proposed at the former CCC/USDA facility in Webber.

LaFreniere, L. M.; Environmental Science Division

2006-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

279

Climate VISION: Private Sector Initiatives: Business Roundtable: Work Plans  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Work Plans Work Plans Business Roundtable Logo Business Roundtable is an association of 160 leading CEOs of companies with 4.5 trillion dollars in annual revenue and employing nearly 10 million people. While we are leading the way on many fronts, our commitment to a sustainable future is our top priority. Our work on Climate RESOLVE (Responsible Environmental Steps, Opportunities to Lead by Voluntary Efforts), mobilizes the resources and expertise of the Roundtable member companies behind the goal of enhanced action to control greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and improve the GHG intensity of the U.S. economy. We are pleased that the vast majority of our members are participating in Climate RESOLVE. A complete list of our Climate RESOLVE members is available on our website.

280

Tank waste remediation system multi-year work plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Tank Waste Remediation System (TWRS) Multi-Year Work Plan (MYWP) documents the detailed total Program baseline and was constructed to guide Program execution. The TWRS MYWP is one of two elements that comprise the TWRS Program Management Plan. The TWRS MYWP fulfills the Hanford Site Management System requirement for a Multi-Year Program Plan and a Fiscal-Year Work Plan. The MYWP addresses program vision, mission, objectives, strategy, functions and requirements, risks, decisions, assumptions, constraints, structure, logic, schedule, resource requirements, and waste generation and disposition. Sections 1 through 6, Section 8, and the appendixes provide program-wide information. Section 7 includes a subsection for each of the nine program elements that comprise the TWRS Program. The foundation of any program baseline is base planning data (e.g., defendable product definition, logic, schedules, cost estimates, and bases of estimates). The TWRS Program continues to improve base data. As data improve, so will program element planning, integration between program elements, integration outside of the TWRS Program, and the overall quality of the TWRS MYWP. The MYWP establishes the TWRS baseline objectives to store, treat, and immobilize highly radioactive Hanford waste in an environmentally sound, safe, and cost-effective manner. The TWRS Program will complete the baseline mission in 2040 and will incur costs totalling approximately 40 billion dollars. The summary strategy is to meet the above objectives by using a robust systems engineering effort, placing the highest possible priority on safety and environmental protection; encouraging {open_quotes}out sourcing{close_quotes} of the work to the extent practical; and managing significant but limited resources to move toward final disposition of tank wastes, while openly communicating with all interested stakeholders.

Not Available

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "group work plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Sectored Clean-up Work Plan for Housekeeping Category Waste Sites  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Sectored Clean-up Work Plan (SCWP) replaces the Housekeeping Category Corrective Action Unit Work Plan and provides a strategy to be used for conducting housekeeping activities using a sectored clean-up approach. This work plan provides a process by which one or more existing housekeeping category Corrective Action Sites (CASS) from the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order and/or non-FFACO designated waste site(s) are grouped into a sector for simultaneous remediation and cleanup. This increases effectiveness and efficiencies in labor, materials, equipment, cost, and time. This plan is an effort by the U.S. Department of Energy to expedite work in a more organized and efficient approach. The objectives of this plan are to: Group housekeeping FFACO CASS and non-FFACO housekeeping sites into sectors and remediate during the same field visit; Provide consistent documentation on FFACO CAS and non-FFACO clean-up activities; Perform similar activities under one approved document; Remediate areas inside the Deactivation and Decommissioning facilities and compounds in a campaign-style remediation; and Increase efficiencies and cost-effectiveness, accelerate cleanups, reduce mobilization, demobilization, and remediation costs.

S. J. Nacht

2000-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

282

E-Print Network 3.0 - action work plan Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

work plan Search Powered by Explorit Topic List Advanced Search Sample search results for: action work plan Page: << < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 1 The two faces of plan repair Roman van der...

283

Minutes from Durability Working Group Kick-off meeting  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Minutes from Durability Working Group (DWG) Kick-off Meeting 6/9/10 Contaminants Discussion on effect of air and system contaminants on performance and durability, initiated by S. Blanchet (Nuvera) Question of extent of impurity work in six newly-awarded durability projects represented at this meeting. None of the projects are specifically looking at the effect of system and air impurities on long- term performance degradation. New Argonne durability project does include task on effect of impurities introduced during catalyst synthesis on degradation mechanisms. Discussion on inclusion of newly-funded contaminant projects on durability working group - as these

284

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) Fall 2011 Meeting Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 Report Page 1 of 18 1 Report Page 1 of 18 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting October 25-26, 2011 Hosted by Philadelphia Gas Works Philadelphia, PA Meeting Record The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) is a joint effort between the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) and the utility industry to stimulate the exchange of information among participants and foster energy efficiency projects in Federal facilities nationwide. The FUPWG meeting held in Philadelphia on October 25 and 26 was attended by 178 professionals from the following organizations: * 46 utility officials * 39 federal agency representatives * 11 national laboratory representatives * 82 representatives from energy-related organizations

285

Risk Assessment Technical Expert Working Group Charter, January 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL EXPERT WORKING GROUP ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL EXPERT WORKING GROUP CHARTER January 2012 PURPOSE: To support effective and appropriate utilization of risk assessment tools in nuclear safety applications at defense nuclear facilities. OBJECTIVES: The Risk Assessment Technical Expert Working Group (RWG) is established to assist the Department of Energy (DOE) with the appropriate and effective use of quantitative risk assessment in nuclear safety-related activities. The activities of the group will help DOE make sure that risk assessments supporting nuclear safety decisions are: conducted in a consistent manner; of appropriate quality; properly documented; and properly tailored to the needs of the decisions they are intended to support. The RWG will also assist DOE in assessing the adequacy of available tools and

286

INDIAN COUNTRY ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKING GROUP ICEIWG  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

INDIAN COUNTRY ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKING GROUP INDIAN COUNTRY ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKING GROUP ICEIWG June 21, 2012 GOLDEN, COLORADO National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, Colorado 80401 AGENDA MEETING ROOM - NREL ROOM 344C THURSDAY, JUNE 21, 2012 9:00am MEET IN HOTEL LOBBY Denver Marriott West Hotel 1717 Denver West Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401 The hotel will provide a shuttle to take the group to NREL. Please be in the hotel lobby by 9:00am. Continental breakfast will be served onsite. 9:30am - 12:00pm WELCOME, INTRODUCTIONS & REVIEW OF AGENDA Tracey LeBeau, Director, U.S. DOE Office of Indian Energy INTRODUCTION OF ICEIWG MEMBERS New and current working group members will have the opportunity to introduce themselves and to share their tribe's expertise and interests in Indian

287

Lesson Learned by Savannah River Site Activity-level Work Planning and Control  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Slide Presentation by Bonnie Barnes, Savannah River Remediation. Work Planning and Control at Savannah River Remediation.

288

FY 95 engineering work plan for the design reconstitution implementation action plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Design reconstitution work is to be performed as part of an overall effort to upgrade Configuration Management (CM) at TWRS. WHC policy is to implement a program that is compliant with DOE-STD-1073-93, Guide for Operational Configuration Management Program. DOE-STD-1073 requires an adjunct program for reconstituting design information. WHC-SD-WM-CM-009, Design Reconstitution Program Plan for Waste Tank Farms and 242-A Evaporator of Tank Waste Remediation System, is the TWRS plan for meeting DOE-STD-1073 design reconstitution requirements. The design reconstitution plan is complex requiring significant time and effort for implementation. In order to control costs, and integrate the work into other TWRS activities, a Design Reconstitution Implementation Action Plan (DR IAP) will be developed, and approved by those organizations having ownership or functional interest in this activity.

Bigbee, J.D.

1994-11-09T23:59:59.000Z

289

WIPP Facility Work Plan for Solid Waste Management Units  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This 2002 Facility Work Plan (FWP) has been prepared as required by Module VII, Permit Condition VII.U.3 of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Hazardous Waste Facility Permit, NM4890139088-TSDF (the Permit) (New Mexico Environment Department [NMED], 1999a), and incorporates comments from the NMED received on December 6, 2000 (NMED, 2000a). This February 2002 FWP describes the programmatic facility-wide approach to future investigations at Solid Waste Management Units (SWMU) and Areas of Concern (AOC) specified in the Permit. The Permittees are evaluating data from previous investigations of the SWMUs and AOCs against the most recent guidance proposed by the NMED. Based on these data, and completion of the August 2001 sampling requested by the NMED, the Permittees expect that no further sampling will be required and that a request for No Further Action (NFA) at the SWMUs and AOCs will be submitted to the NMED. This FWP addresses the current Permit requirements. It uses the results of previous investigations performed at WIPP and expands the investigations as required by the Permit. As an alternative to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Facility Investigation (RFI) specified in Module VII of the Permit, current NMED guidance identifies an Accelerated Corrective Action Approach (ACAA) that may be used for any SWMU or AOC (NMED, 1998). This accelerated approach is used to replace the standard RFI Work Plan and Report sequence with a more flexible decision-making approach. The ACAA process allows a facility to exit the schedule of compliance contained in the facility's Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) permit module and proceed on an accelerated time frame. Thus, the ACAA processcan be entered either before or after an RFI Work Plan. According to the NMED's guidance, a facility can prepare an RFI Work Plan or Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) for any SWMU or AOC (NMED, 1998). Based on this guidance, a SAP constitutes an acceptable alternative to the RFI Work Plan specified in the Permit. The NMED accepted that the Permittees are using the ACAA in a letter dated April 20, 2000.

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2002-02-14T23:59:59.000Z

290

May 21, 2012, Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Focus Group Training Work Group Charter  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

05-21-12 05-21-12 Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Focus Group Training Work Group Charter In an ongoing effort to further the improvement of health, safety, environmental, and security performance within the Department, DOE is engaged in the establishment of Work Groups to pursue health and safety improvement across the DOE Complex. These efforts support DOE's responsibility as owner/manager to protect its greatest asset: the worker. The work groups support DOE's integrated safety management system and further DOE's best interests by fostering worker involvement and partnerships to maximize continuity of operations and the success of the Department's national security mission.

291

Remedial action work plan for the Colonie site. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Colonie site is a DOE Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) site located in the Town of Colonie, New York, and consisting of an interim storage site and several vicinity properties. The Colonie Interim Storage Site (CISS) is the former National Lead (NL) Industries plant located at 1130 Central Avenue. There are 11 vicinity properties that received remedial action in 1984: 7 located south of the site on Yardboro and Palmer Avenues just across the Colonie-Albany town limits in Albany, and 4 located northwest of the site along Central Avenue in Colonie. Of these properties, nine are residences and two are commercial properties. This document describes the engineering design, construction, and associated plans for remedial action on the vicinity properties and the interim storage site. These plans include both radiological and chemical work. Radiological work includes: excavating the above-guideline radioactive wastes on the vicinity properties; designing required facilities for the interim storage site; preparing the interim storage site to receive these contaminated materials; transporting the contaminated materials to the interim waste storage stockpile; and preparing necessary schedules for accomplishing the remedial actions. Chemical work involves: developing the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) closure plans; neutralizing chemical hazards associated with plating solutions; inventorying on-site chemicals; and disposal of chemicals and/or residues. 17 refs., 5 figs., 1 tab.

Not Available

1985-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

292

U.S. and India Conclude First Workshop of the Civil Nuclear Working Group |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Conclude First Workshop of the Civil Nuclear Working Conclude First Workshop of the Civil Nuclear Working Group U.S. and India Conclude First Workshop of the Civil Nuclear Working Group January 12, 2006 - 10:31am Addthis Aimed at Fostering Cooperation on Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy MUMBAI, INDIA -- The U.S. and India today concluded a four-day workshop on civilian nuclear energy, building on the U.S.-India Energy Dialogue initiated by President George W. Bush and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in September 2004, and launched by Secretary of Energy Samuel Bodman and India Deputy Chairman of Planning Commission Dr. Montek Singh Ahluwalia in May, 2005. The U.S. was represented at the first workshop of the Civil Nuclear Working Group by R. Shane Johnson, acting director of the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology. India was

293

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: High Temperature Membrane Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

High Temperature Membrane Working Group High Temperature Membrane Working Group The High Temperature Membrane Working Group consists of government, industry, and university researchers interested in developing high temperature membranes for fuel cells. Description Technical Targets Meetings Contacts Description Polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cells typically operate at temperatures no higher than 60°C-80°C due to structural limitations of the membrane. Operating PEM fuel cell stacks at higher temperatures (120°C for transportation and 150°C for stationary applications), however, would yield significant energy benefits. For example, heat rejection is easier at higher temperatures, which would allow use of smaller heat exchangers in fuel cell power systems. In addition, for reformate fuel cell systems, carbon monoxide (CO) tolerance of the stack is less problematic at higher temperatures, which would reduce the size requirements or possibly eliminate the need for some CO clean-up beds in the fuel processor.

294

Risk Assessment Technical Expert Working Group (RWG)Conference Call  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Conference Call Conference Call Minutes, February 20, 2010 Risk Assessment Technical Expert Working Group (RWG)Conference Call Minutes, February 20, 2010 Risk Assessment Technical Experts Working Group Charter - discussed who should sign and at what level the charter should be authorized. It was concluded that the Under Secretaries as the Central Technical Authorities and HS-1 should ultimately authorize the charter. It was recognized that having such high level approval of the charter would likely increase the time needed to finalize it, However, it was concluded that any delay would not impact activities because the business of the working group will move forward in the interim. Members should provide comments on current draft to Jim O'Brien (with cc to all members) by March 8 with the goal of

295

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 2007 Meeting Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FEDERAL UTILITY PARTNERSHIP WORKING GROUP MEETING NOVEMBER 28-29, 2007 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA HOSTED BY: SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC INTRODUCTION The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) held its Fall 2007 meeting in San Diego, California on November 28-29. The meeting was hosted by San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E) and was held at the Holiday Inn on the Bay. A total of 123 individuals attended the meeting, including at least 11 new members. Organizations represented included 48 utility officials, 6 Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) representatives, 40 federal agency representatives, 8 national laboratory representatives, and 21 representatives from energy-related organizations. The working group is a joint effort between FEMP and the utility industry to stimulate the exchange of information among

296

September 2012, 10 CFR 851 Work Group Status Overview  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

10 CFR 851 Work Group Status Overview 10 CFR 851 Work Group Status Overview Accomplishments: 1. March 2012. 10 CFR 851 Workshop was held in conjunction with the 2012 Chemical Management Workshop. 2. Communication tools to enhance 10 CFR 851 Worker Safety and Health Program (WSHP) compliance updated: Requirements checklist distributed across DOE complex and on the 10 CFR 851 website; DOE Guide 440.1-1B to include technical clarifications. 3. Aug 7. A WG teleconference to reconfirm the actions described in the charter and to discuss the need to identify areas for the Work Groups next efforts. Near Term Goals/Activities: 1. Samples of acceptable WSHP programs (including ones based on ISM) will be posted on the 851 web site. 2. Teaming of HS-10, NTC, NIEHS, HAMMER to: Develop and/or identify

297

INDIAN COUNTRY ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKING GROUP ICEIWG  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

INDIAN COUNTRY ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKING GROUP ICEIWG May 29, 2013 Wild Horse Pass Hotel and Casino Chandler, Arizona MEETING OVERVIEW The U.S. Department of Energy Office (DOE) of Indian Energy (IE) hosted an Indian Country Energy and Infrastructure Working Group (ICEIWG) Meeting on Wednesday, May 29, 2013 in Chandler, Arizona. IE welcomed reappointed and new members to ICEIWG. The ICEIWG meeting was held prior to the seventh Tribal Leader Forum on "Leveraging Tribal Renewable Resources to Support Military Energy Goals." Arizona tribal leaders and intertribal organization representatives were encouraged to attend this meeting.

298

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting: Summary Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Held in Conjunction with the DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review Crystal Gateway Marriott, Arlington, VA June 11, 2008 SUMMARY REPORT Compiled by Romesh Kumar Argonne National Laboratory and Elvin Yzugullu Sentech, Inc. July 18, 2008 SUMMARY REPORT Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting June 11, 2008 Crystal Gateway Marriott, Arlington, VA Meeting Objectives This meeting was one of a continuing series of biannual meetings of the Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group (SSAWG). The objective of these meetings is to bring together the DOE research community involved in systems analysis of hydrogen storage materials and processes for information exchange and to update the researchers on related

299

Transportation Planning & Decision Science Group Transportation Systems Research Group Diane Davidson Keith Kahl  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Transportation Planning & Decision Science Group Transportation Systems Research Group Diane Davidson Keith Kahl 865-946-1475 865-946-1236 Center for Transportation Analysis News Oak Ridge National, during the Chairman's Luncheon at the 92nd Annual Transportation Research Board (TRB) Meeting

300

WPN 14-4: Quality Work Plan Requirement | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

WPN 14-4: Quality Work Plan Requirement WPN 14-4: Quality Work Plan Requirement This guidance describes requirements to support and verify quality work in the Department of...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "group work plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

July 10-11, 2012, HSS Focus Group Training Work Group - Meeting Minutes  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Training Work Group Training Work Group Meeting Minutes July 10 & 11, 2012 The Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Focus Group Training Work Group met at the DOE National Training Center (NTC) in Albuquerque, NM on Tuesday, July 10 and Wednesday, July 11, 2012. The meeting was chaired by the Work Group co-chairs, Karen Boardman (HSS/NTC), Pete Stafford (AFL-CIO BCTD/CPWR), and Julie Johnston (EFCOG). Attachment 1 is the Meeting Agenda; Attachment 2 is a list of meeting attendees; and Attachment 3 is the proposed Radworker Training Reciprocity Program. July 10, 2012 Chronologic Meeting Summary: Following a Co-chair pre-meeting, Karen

302

Plutonium-Uranium Extraction (PUREX) facility preclosure work plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The dangerous waste permit identification number (WA7890008967)was issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Washington State Department of Ecology. This identification number encompasses a number of treatment, storage, and/or disposal units within the Hanford Facility. One of these treatment, storage, and/or disposal units is the PUREX Facility,currently undergoing a phased closure. The PUREX Facility Preclosure Work Plan submittal differs from closure plans previously submitted by the U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office to the Washington State Department of Ecology,in that the closure process occurs in three distinct phases as part of the decommissioning process (i.e., transition,surveillance and maintenance, and disposition). Final closure will occur during the disposition phase. This phased decommissioning process is implemented because development of a complete closure plan during the transition phase is impractical and future land use determinations have not been identified. The objective of the transition phase is to place the PUREX Facility in a safe configuration with respect to human health and the environment. Following the transition phase activities, the PUREX Facility will begin the surveillance and maintenance phase of 10 or more years until disposition phase activities commence. The closure plan for the PUREX facility will be prepared during the disposition phase. For purposes of this documentation, the PUREX Facility does not include the PUREX Storage Tunnels. The PUREX Storage Tunnels are an operating storage unit(DOE/RL-94-24).

Bhatia, R.K., Westinghouse Hanford

1996-07-09T23:59:59.000Z

303

TEC Working Group Topic Groups Section 180(c) Key Documents | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Section 180(c) Key Documents Section 180(c) Key Documents TEC Working Group Topic Groups Section 180(c) Key Documents Key Documents Briefing Package for Section 180(c) Implementation - July 2005 Executive Summary Introduction Appendix A - Funding Distribution Method Appendix B - Timing and Eligibility Appendix C - Allowable Activities/Training Appendix D - Definitions Appendix E - Pass-Through of Funds Appendix F - Contingency Re-Routing Appendix G - Policy on Rulemaking Appendix H - Funding Allocation Method Appendix I - State Fees Appendix J - Funding Operational Activities Appendix K - Matching Funds More Documents & Publications Implementation of Section 180(c) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act TEC Working Group Topic Groups Section 180(c) Meeting Summaries TEC Working Group Topic Groups Tribal

304

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Storage Systems Analysis Working Group  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Storage Systems Analysis Working Group The Storage Systems Analysis Working Group, launched in March 2005, provides a forum to facilitate research and communication of hydrogen storage-related analysis activities among researchers actively engaged in hydrogen storage systems analyses. The working group includes members from DOE, the national laboratories, industry, and academia. Description Technical Targets Meetings Contacts Description Hydrogen storage is a key enabling technology for the advancement of hydrogen and fuel cell power technologies in transportation, stationary, and portable power applications. One of the most challenging technical barriers known is how to efficiently store hydrogen on-board a vehicle to meet customer expectations of a driving range greater than 300 miles-as well as performance, safety, and cost-without impacting passenger or cargo space. The Department of Energy's hydrogen storage activity is coordinated through the "National Hydrogen Storage Project," with multiple university, industry, and federal laboratory partners focused on research and development of on-board vehicular hydrogen storage technologies. This research also has components applicable to off-board storage of hydrogen for refueling infrastructure and the off-board regeneration of chemical hydrogen carriers applicable to hydrogen delivery.

305

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Spring 2009 Meeting Welcome  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentationgiven at the Spring 2009 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meetingcovers the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) mission and services; Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) Section 432 guidance; and American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA).

306

Catalyst Working Group Kick-off Meeting: Personal Commentary  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Personal commentary on future directions in fuel cell electrocatalysis, presented by Mark Debe, 3M, at the kick-off meeting of the U.S. Department of Energy Fuel Cell Technologies Program's Catalysis Working Group, held May 14, 2012, in Arlington, Virginia.

307

BP and Hydrogen Pipelines DOE Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

BP and Hydrogen Pipelines DOE Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop August 30-31, 2005 Gary P · UK partnership opened the first hydrogen demonstration refueling station · Two hydrogen pipelines l · " i i l i 2 i i ll i i l pl ifi i · 8" ly idl i i l s Hydrogen Pipelines Two nes, on y a brand

308

Summary of Muon Working Group B. Lee Roberts  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

BOSTON UNIVERSITY Summary of Muon Working Group Report on ¡ ¢ £ , EDM and ¤¦¥ B. Lee Roberts UNIVERSITY The Program of Muon Physics: § ¨© experiment to 0.05 ppm. § Muon EDM to cm. § Limit, Kyoto, September 2002 ­ p.3/25 #12;BOSTON UNIVERSITY Machine Requirements These experiments (except

Roberts, B. Lee

309

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting Argonne DC Offices  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting Argonne DC Offices L'Enfant Plaza and Kristin Deason Sentech, Inc. January 16, 2008 #12;SUMMARY REPORT Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Objectives This meeting was one of a continuing series of biannual meetings of the Hydrogen Storage Systems

310

DOE-EERE Durability Working Group Meeting Notes  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Meeting notes from the Fall 2011 Durability Working Group (DWG) Meeting sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Fuel Cell Technologies Program. Notes also include a summary of progress on action items from the Spring 2011 DWG meeting.

311

4 MARCH 2002, GSA TODAY CD-ROM Working Group*  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

4 MARCH 2002, GSA TODAY CD-ROM Working Group* ABSTRACT An integration of new seismic reflec- tion, and to be the product of progressive evolu- tion of the lithosphere. INTRODUCTION The CD-ROM (Continental Dynamics tectonism. CD-ROM integrates a series of coordi- nated seismic experiments (Keller et al., 1999

Pazzaglia, Frank J.

312

NREL: News - NREL Assembles Industry Working Group to Advance Solar  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

713 713 NREL Assembles Industry Working Group to Advance Solar Securitization Webinar focusing on SAPC to be held on March 22 March 19, 2013 The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE)'s National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) recently convened the Solar Access to Public Capital (SAPC) working group with a mission to enable securitization of solar PV assets and associated cash flows in the marketplace. SAPC's primary efforts center on the standardization of power purchase agreements, leases, and other documents relevant to residential and commercial deployment, and the development of robust datasets to assess performance and credit-default risk. These activities are designed to allow projects to be grouped into tradable securities. Securitization is expected to attract additional investors to the solar asset class, enabling the

313

May 2012 FEMP RE Working Group - Open Meeting  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

May 2012 FEMP RE Working Group May 2012 FEMP RE Working Group Open Meeting Anne Crawley FEMP RE Team Lead. Kevin DeGroat Antares Group, Inc. Federal Energy Management Program femp.energy.gov Agenda Courtesy: * Do Not Put Us On Hold! Hold Music is Lovely But Very Disruptive * Please Mute While Listening To Reduce Background Noise * Hold Questions Until End of Presentations Conference Call Number: 202-287-1063 2:30 to 2:40 Introductions and Welcome (Anne Crawley) 2:40 to 3:00 Large Scale RE Development on Public Lands (Boyan Kovacic) 3:00 to 3:20 NREL Tools and Analysis (Andy Walker) 3:20 to 3:30 Other Business/ Open Floor (Anne Crawley leading discussion) 3:30 Adjourn Federal Energy Management Program femp.energy.gov * Welcome Boyan Kovacic of FEMP on developments and opportunities for large-scale RE development on public

314

May 2012 FEMP RE Working Group - Open Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 2012 FEMP RE Working Group May 2012 FEMP RE Working Group Open Meeting Anne Crawley FEMP RE Team Lead. Kevin DeGroat Antares Group, Inc. Federal Energy Management Program femp.energy.gov Agenda Courtesy: * Do Not Put Us On Hold! Hold Music is Lovely But Very Disruptive * Please Mute While Listening To Reduce Background Noise * Hold Questions Until End of Presentations Conference Call Number: 202-287-1063 2:30 to 2:40 Introductions and Welcome (Anne Crawley) 2:40 to 3:00 Large Scale RE Development on Public Lands (Boyan Kovacic) 3:00 to 3:20 NREL Tools and Analysis (Andy Walker) 3:20 to 3:30 Other Business/ Open Floor (Anne Crawley leading discussion) 3:30 Adjourn Federal Energy Management Program femp.energy.gov * Welcome Boyan Kovacic of FEMP on developments and opportunities for large-scale RE development on public

315

Risk Assessment Technical Expert Working Group (RWG) Conference Call  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Conference Conference Call Minutes, March 8, 2010 Risk Assessment Technical Expert Working Group (RWG) Conference Call Minutes, March 8, 2010 Risk Assessment Technical Experts Working Group Charter - The steering committee discussed the draft charter. Two recommended changes were agreed upon: * A sentence will be added to identify that the steering committee will develop protocols to define specifics relative to certain work activities (such as peer reviews) * Agreed to add Steve Koonin, Undersecretary for Science for signature. Note: Sharon Steele is officially the NNSA representative to the steering committee. 2. Web Page - Jim O'Brien reviewed the website. In general, the steering committee agreed that with small changes the web site was ready to go "live."

316

July 10-11, 2012, HSS Focus Group Training Work Group - Agenda  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Focus Group Training Working Group (TWG) Subcommittee Meeting Focus Group Training Working Group (TWG) Subcommittee Meeting July 10, 2012 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM 8:30 a.m. Meet Visitors at Gazebo Evan Dunne 8:00 a.m. Pre-meeting for Co-Chairs to discuss how Co-Chairs will operate together:  Roles and Responsibilities  Co-Chair Conference Calls  Working Group Calls  Meetings, etc. Pete Stafford, Julie Johnston, Karen Boardman 9:00 a.m. Co-Chairs meet with TWG Subcommittee (HAMMER, NTC, NIEHS)  Discuss Expectations of Subcommittee ALL 10:00 a.m. Review charter and discuss roles and responsibilities ALL 12:00 noon LUNCH 1:00 p.m. Review Recent Activities  OR Visit  NIEHS Trainer's Exchange  Sandia Learning Workshop, etc. ALL 2:00 p.m. Discuss potential projects/involvements

317

Microsoft Word - s05822_LEHR_WorkPlan  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Sample Collection Procedures Sample Collection Procedures This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy LEHR Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan November 2010 Doc. No. S05822-0.0 Page E-1 1.0 Sampling Methods Monitoring well samples will be collected according to Standard Operating Procedure 9.1, "Low-Flow Ground Water Sampling with Dedicated Pumps". A sample preparation area will be established adjacent to the well location. The work surface will be covered with plastic sheeting to minimize the potential spread of contamination. The following equipment will be staged in the sample-preparation area: * A spill kit, * Personal protective equipment, * Sample containers, * A decontamination station, * Bailers, * A wastewater drum, * Custody seals, and

318

PROLIFERATION RESISTANCE AND PHYSICAL PROTECTION WORKING GROUP: METHODOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

We summarize the technical progress and accomplishments on the evaluation methodology for proliferation resistance and physical protection (PR and PP) of Generation IV nuclear energy systems. We intend the results of the evaluations performed with the methodology for three types of users: system designers, program policy makers, and external stakeholders. The PR and PP Working Group developed the methodology through a series of demonstration and case studies. Over the past few years various national and international groups have applied the methodology to nuclear energy system designs as well as to developing approaches to advanced safeguards.

Bari R. A.; Whitlock, J.; Therios, I.U.; Peterson, P.F.

2012-11-14T23:59:59.000Z

319

Presentation to the EAC - Smart Grid Subcommittee Work Plan Status - Joe Paladino & Wanda Reder  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Smart Grid Subcommittee Smart Grid Subcommittee Work Plan Status Joe Paladino - DOE Wanda Reder - EAC Smart Grid Sub- Committee Chair June 12, 2012 * Considerations: - Build from resulting from ARRA SGIG/SGDP project results that were awarded ~two years ago - EAC Smart Grid Sub-Committee role defined in the 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act * Approach: - Met with DOE in January 2012, May 2012 - Conference calls and iterations with Committee and DOE staff - Participated in Peer Review - Build upon DOE activity underway * Philosophy: - Work closely with DOE staff to find ways for EAC to add value - User priorities to focus efforts throughout 2012 2012 Smart Grid Work Plan Approach SGIG Spending EPRI Estimate Brattle Group Estimate $7.9 billion with cost share to be spent through 2015

320

FY 1992 work plan and technical progress reports  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Desert Research Institute (DRI) is a division of the University of Nevada System devoted to multidisciplinary scientific research. For more than 25 years, DRI has conducted research for the US Department of Energy`s Nevada Field Office (DOE/NV) in support of operations at the Nevada Test Site (NTS). During that time, the research program has grown from an early focus on hydrologic studies to include the areas of geology, archaeology, environmental compliance and monitoring, statistics, database management, public education, and community relations. The range of DRI`s activities has also expanded to include a considerable amount of management and administrative support in addition to scientific investigations. DRI`s work plan for FY 1992 reflects a changing emphasis in DOE/NV activities from nuclear weapons testing to environmental restoration and monitoring. Most of the environmental projects from FY 1991 are continuing, and several new projects have been added to the Environmental Compliance Program. The Office of Technology Development Program, created during FY 1991, also includes a number of environmental projects. This document contains the FY 1992 work plan and quarterly technical progress reports for each DRI project.

NONE

1992-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "group work plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting Report: Fall 2010  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 Meeting Report | Page 1 of 16 0 Meeting Report | Page 1 of 16 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting October 20-21, 2010 Rapid City, South Dakota Hosted by: Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. INTRODUCTION The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) is a joint effort between the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) and the utility industry to stimulate the exchange of information among participants and foster energy efficiency projects in Federal facilities nationwide. 136 individuals attended the meeting. Attendance Representation: * 20 Utility officials * 43 Federal agency representatives * 6 National Laboratory representatives * 67 Representatives from energy-related organizations (See Appendix 1 for a full list if participants and organizations at the end of this report.)

322

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Fall 2006 Meeting Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NOVEMBER 1-2, 2006 NOVEMBER 1-2, 2006 SAN FRANCISCO, CA INTRODUCTION The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) held its Fall 2006 meeting in San Francisco, CA, on November 1-2. The meeting was hosted by Pacific Gas & Electric's (PG&E). A total of 80 individuals attended the meeting, including 28 new members. Organizations represented included 25 utility officials, 8 Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) representatives, 22 Federal agency representatives, 6 National Laboratory representatives, and 18 representatives from energy-related organizations (see attached list of participants and corresponding organizations). The working group is a joint effort between FEMP and the utility industry to stimulate the exchange of information among participants and foster energy efficiency projects in

323

EM QA Working Group September 2011 Meeting Materials  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

QUALITY ASSURANCE WORKING GROUP (VIDEO CONFERENCE) QUALITY ASSURANCE WORKING GROUP (VIDEO CONFERENCE) Meeting Location: Hanford, WA will be the Lead Site for this Meeting in Conjunction with the ISM Conference Room: Video Conference with Site Offices and Headquarters Offices Agenda for September 13, 2011 Time Topic Lead 12:00 - 12:30 pm (eastern) Potential Revision to the Performance Indicator and Measurement Approach for Goal #5 of the Journey to Excellence Regarding Quality Assurance Bob Murray (DOE-HQ) 12:30 - 1:00 pm (eastern) Discussion of major changes and challenges with revision to the Corporate Quality Assurance Program, EM-QA-001 Larry Perkins (DOE-HQ) 1:00 - 1:30 pm (eastern) Lessons Learned on Flow-down of Quality Requirements at

324

Hydrogen Storage Systems Anlaysis Working Group Meeting, December 12, 2006  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Argonne National Laboratory DC Offices 955 L'Enfant Plaza, North, SW, Suite 6000 Washington, DC December 12, 2006 SUMMARY REPORT Compiled by Romesh Kumar Argonne National Laboratory and Laura Verduzco Sentech, Inc. February 28, 2007 SUMMARY REPORT Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting December 12, 2006 955 L'Enfant Plaza, North, SW, Suite 6000, Washington, DC Meeting Objectives This meeting was one of a continuing series of biannual meetings of this Working Group. The objective of these meetings is to bring together the DOE research community involved in systems analysis of hydrogen storage materials and processes for information exchange and to update the researchers on related developments within the DOE program. A major thrust of

325

July 2012, 10 CFR 851 Work Group Status Overview  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

10 CFR 851 Work Group Status Overview 10 CFR 851 Work Group Status Overview Accomplishments: 1. March 2012. 10 CFR 851 Workshop was held in conjunction with the 2012 Chemical Management Workshop. 2. Communication tools to enhance 10 CFR 851 Worker Safety and Health Program (WSHP) compliance updated: Requirements checklist distributed across DOE complex and on the 10 CFR 851 website; DOE Guide 440.1-1B to include technical clarifications. Near Term Goals/Activities: 1. Samples of acceptable WSHP programs (including ones based on ISM) will be posted on the 851 web site. 2. Teaming of HS-10, NTC, NIEHS, HAMMER to: Develop and/or identify applicable training materials and methods for the recent promulgated Hazard Communication standard, DOE wide approach for this training, and approach for

326

Renewable Energy Working Group - Summary Notes 5-2-2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Working Group Working Group Notes for the Open Webinar Meeting May 2, 2012 2:30 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. Introductions and Welcome Anne Crawley welcomed all participants to the meeting. Large Scale RE Development on Public Lands Boyan Kovacic, FEMP, provided a presentation regarding large-scale renewable energy project development on Bureau of Land Management (BLM) land. In this context, large-scale project size is considered to be approximately 10 megawatts (MW) and above. BLM has been implementing large- scale projects for the past three years. To indicate the scale, he noted that BLM manages 10% of U.S. land. He provided an overview of how much BLM land is suitable for solar, wind, and geothermal development. Mr. Kovacic outlined the Federal goals, BLM targets, and state renewable portfolio standard (RPS)

327

DOE Durability Working Group February 2013 Meeting Agenda  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE Durability Working Group (DWG) DOE Durability Working Group (DWG) Meeting Agenda Thursday, February 28, 2013 Crystal City Marriott Crystal City, VA 8:30 am Welcome and introductory comments Debbie Myers (Argonne) and Rod Borup (Los Alamos) - co-chairs 8:45 am Introduction to meeting objectives Dimitrios Papageorgopoulos, Department of Energy, Fuel Cell Technologies Office Summary of what has been learned in DOE durability-related projects and durability R&D needs/gaps (PI's or project representatives; 10 min talks per person) 9:00 am Session I. Durability: Nuvera (Olga Polevaya), Ballard (Silvia Wessel), LANL (Rod Borup), and ANL (Debbie Myers) 9:40 am Session II. Modeling: LBNL (Adam Weber), ANL (Rajesh Ahluwalia) 10:00 am Session III. Catalyst and Impurities: 3M (Radoslav Atanasoski),

328

INDIAN COUNTRY ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKING GROUP ICEIWG  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

INDIAN COUNTRY ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKING GROUP ICEIWG March 14, 2013 Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino Las Vegas, Nevada MEETING OVERVIEW The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Indian Energy (IE) hosted an Indian Country Energy and Infrastructure Working Group (ICEIWG) Meeting on Thursday, March 14, 2013 in Las Vegas, Nevada. IE solicited nominations for new members to ICEIWG-current, new and potential new members, as well as other tribal leaders and intertribal organization representatives were encouraged to attend. PARTICIPANTS ICEIWG Members Barney Enos, District 4 Councilman, Gila River Indian Community Jim Manion, General Manager of Warm Springs Power, Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation William Micklin, CEO, Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay Indians

329

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Spring 2007 Meeting Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MEETING MEETING MAY 1-2, 2007 CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA HOSTED BY: FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT INTRODUCTION The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) held its Spring 2007 meeting in Cape Canaveral, Florida on May 1-2. The meeting was hosted by Florida Power and Light (FPL) and was held at the Doubletree Oceanfront Cocoa Beach Hotel. A total of 86 individuals attended the meeting, including at least 11 new members. Organizations represented included 36 utility officials, 3 Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) representatives, 19 Federal agency representatives, 5 National Laboratory representatives, and 24 representatives from energy-related organizations (see attached list of participants and corresponding organizations). The working group is a joint effort between FEMP and the

330

Report from the dosimetry working group to CEDR project management  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

On August 2, 1989, Admiral Watkins, Secretary of the US Department of Energy (DOE), presented a four-point program designed to enhance the DOE epidemiology program. One part of this program was the establishment of a Comprehensive Epidemiologic Data Resource (CEDR) to facilitate independent research to validate and supplement DOE research on human health effects. A Dosimetry Working Group was formed during May 1991 to evaluate radiation dose variables and associated documentation that would be most useful to researchers for retrospective and prospective studies. The Working Group consisted of thirteen individuals with expertise and experience in health physics, epidemiology, dosimetry, computing, and industrial hygiene. A final report was delivered to CEDR Project Management during February 1992. The report contains a number of major recommendations concerning collection, interpretation, and documentation of dosimetry data to maximize their usefulness to researchers using CEDR for examining possible health effects of occupational exposure to ionizing radiation.

Fix, J J

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

331

Renewable Energy Working Group - Summary Notes 5-2-2012  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Working Group Working Group Notes for the Open Webinar Meeting May 2, 2012 2:30 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. Introductions and Welcome Anne Crawley welcomed all participants to the meeting. Large Scale RE Development on Public Lands Boyan Kovacic, FEMP, provided a presentation regarding large-scale renewable energy project development on Bureau of Land Management (BLM) land. In this context, large-scale project size is considered to be approximately 10 megawatts (MW) and above. BLM has been implementing large- scale projects for the past three years. To indicate the scale, he noted that BLM manages 10% of U.S. land. He provided an overview of how much BLM land is suitable for solar, wind, and geothermal development. Mr. Kovacic outlined the Federal goals, BLM targets, and state renewable portfolio standard (RPS)

332

Risk Assessment Technical Expert Working Group (RAWG) Conference Call Minutes  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Risk Assessment Technical Expert Working Group (RWG) Risk Assessment Technical Expert Working Group (RWG) Conference Call Minutes May 6, 2010 PARTICIPANTS Members: Don Nichols (CDNS), Jim O'Brien (HSS), Carol Sohn (SC), Rich Stark (NE), Bill Weaver (EM for Steve Krahn), Todd Lapointe (CNS for Chip Lagdon) Others: Kamiar Jamali (NE), Andy Wallo (DNFSB 2009-1 Responsible Manager), Rama Sastry (HSS), Samuel Rosenbloom (HSS) SUMMARY 1. Risk Assessment Information Notice (IN): HSS provided the draft IN to safety basis experts from SNL, Y-12 and PNNL for their review and comment. Their comments were addressed and the IN is back into concurrence. 2. DNFSB Brief: HSS is coordinated with the RWG and DNFSB to schedule a DNFSB brief in June. 3. Risk Assessment Training: The National Training Center is presenting its risk assessment overview

333

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group: Welcome to Portland  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Welcome to Portland Mike Weedall Vice President for Energy Efficiency Bonneville Power Administration FUPWG Spring Meeting Portland, Oregon April 20-21, 2011 Slide 2 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Bonneville Power Slide 3 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N BPA's Service Area Slide 4 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Energy Efficiency Pays * BPA helps our customers encourage energy

334

Chair, CTBT working group B Radionuclide Expert Group and the U.S.  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Chair, CTBT working group B Radionuclide Expert Group and the U.S. Chair, CTBT working group B Radionuclide Expert Group and the U.S. Radionuclide Subgroup of the Verification Monitoring Task Force, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Who We Are > In The Spotlight > Ted Bowyer

335

Summary of Future of DIS Working Group Session  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Despite the closure of the HERA accelerator in the past few years, much physics still remains to be understood, from the quark and gluon content of the nucleon/nucleus across all x to the still unknown spin structure of the proton. The 'Future of DIS' working group was dedicated to discussions on these and many other subjects. This paper represents a brief overview of the discussions. For further details, please refer to individual contributions.

Lamont M.; Guzey, V.; Polini, A.

2011-04-11T23:59:59.000Z

336

Report of the Quark Flavor Physics Working Group  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This report represents the response of the Intensity Frontier Quark Flavor Physics Working Group to the Snowmass charge. We summarize the current status of quark flavor physics and identify many exciting future opportunities for studying the properties of strange, charm, and bottom quarks. The ability of these studies to reveal the effects of new physics at high mass scales make them an essential ingredient in a well-balanced experimental particle physics program.

Butler, J N; Ritchie, J L; Cirigliano, V; Kettell, S; Briere, R; Petrov, A A; Schwartz, A; Skwarnicki, T; Zupan, J; Christ, N; Sharpe, S R; Van de Water, R S; Altmannshofer, W; Arkani-Hamed, N; Artuso, M; Asner, D M; Bernard, C; Bevan, A J; Blanke, M; Bonvicini, G; Browder, T E; Bryman, D A; Campana, P; Cenci, R; Cline, D; Comfort, J; Cronin-Hennessy, D; Datta, A; Dobbs, S; Duraisamy, M; El-Khadra, A X; Fast, J E; Forty, R; Flood, K T; Gershon, T; Grossman, Y; Hamilton, B; Hill, C T; Hill, R J; Hitlin, D G; Jaffe, D E; Jawahery, A; Jessop, C P; Kagan, A L; Kaplan, D M; Kohl, M; Krizan, P; Kronfeld, A S; Lee, K; Littenberg, L S; MacFarlane, D B; Mackenzie, P B; Meadows, B T; Olsen, J; Papucci, M; Parsa, Z; Paz, G; Perez, G; Piilonen, L E; Pitts, K; Purohit, M V; Quinn, B; Ratcliff, B N; Roberts, D A; Rosner, J L; Rubin, P; Seeman, J; Seth, K K; Schmidt, B; Schopper, A; Sokoloff, M D; Soni, A; Stenson, K; Stone, S; Sundrum, R; Tschirhart, R; Vainshtein, A; Wah, Y W; Wilkinson, G; Wise, M B; Worcester, E; Xu, J; Yamanaka, T

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

337

September 8, 2011, HSS/Union Focus Group Work Group Telecom - Meeting Overview and Action Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

09-12-11 Draft 09-12-11 Draft DRAFT Meeting Overview and Action Summary HSS/Union Focus Group Work Group Telecom September 8, 2011 Meeting Overview: Glenn Podonsky reflected on the HSS Focus Group's 5 year history and reported that 24 HSS/Union Focus group meetings have been held to date. He emphasized the value of the relationships that have been developed between HSS and the unions and the need to re-energize efforts and rally to move the ball forward in addressing worker health and safety concerns through the 5 Work Groups. He acknowledged the vital importance of worker health and safety training quality, portability and standardization, and the progress made over the past several

338

Preliminary results of the APAC spills working group  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Spills Working Group is one of 6 working groups under the DOE-DP Accident Phenomenology and Consequence (APAC) methodology evaluation program. Objectives are to assess methodologies available in this area, evaluate their adequacy for accident analysis at DOE facilities, identify development needs, and define standard practices to be followed in the analyses supporting facility safety basis documentation. The group focused on methodologies for estimating 4 types of spill source terms: liquid chemical spills and evaporation, pressurized liquid/gas releases, solid spills and resuspension/sublimation, and resuspension of particulate matter from liquid spills. Computer models were identified with capabilities for quantifying release rates or released amounts from spills, and a set of sample test problems was established for evaluating a specific model for some common or probable accident release scenarios. The group agreed on a set of recommended computer codes which are classified according to spill type and hazard category. Code results for a given problem varied by up to an order of magnitude; this is attributed to differences in how the physics and thermodynamics of the problems were treated by the models.

Brereton, S.; Hesse, D.; kalinich, D.; Lazaro, M.; Mubayi, V.; Shinn, J.

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

339

DOE/OE National SCADA Test Bed Fiscal Year 2009 Work Plan | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

OE National SCADA Test Bed Fiscal Year 2009 Work Plan DOEOE National SCADA Test Bed Fiscal Year 2009 Work Plan This document is designed to help guide and strengthen the DOEOE...

340

E-Print Network 3.0 - action plan work Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

work Search Powered by Explorit Topic List Advanced Search Sample search results for: action plan work Page: << < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 1 The two faces of plan repair Roman van der Krogt...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "group work plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

September 13, 2012, HSS Focus Group Training Work Group - Meeting Minutes  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Subject: Meeting Minutes for Training Working Group Meeting Conducted September 13, 2012 In conjunction with the HAMMER Steering Committee meeting the HSS Focus Group Training Working Group Meeting was conducted from 2:00 PM to 4:30 PM at the HAMMER Training Facility in Richland, WA. The meeting was attended by 33 personnel representing HSS, NTC, NIEHS, CPWR, various labor organizations, and DOE contractors. Additional personnel participated in the meeting via the established conference call. A copy of the personnel physically attending is attached for information. Meeting summary: Julie Goeckner, DOE/EM-40 provided the background and overview of the existing DOE Senior Executive Safety Conscious Work Environment course which was developed to address the

342

Summary Report of Working Group 6: Laser-Plasma Acceleration  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A summary is given of presentations and discussions in theLaser-Plasma Acceleration Working Group at the 2006 Advanced AcceleratorConcepts Workshop. Presentation highlights include: widespreadobservation of quasi-monoenergetic electrons; good agreement betweenmeasured and simulated beam properties; the first demonstration oflaser-plasma acceleration up to 1 GeV; single-shot visualization of laserwakefield structure; new methods for measuring<100 fs electronbunches; and new methods for "machining" laser-plasma acceleratorstructures. Discussion of future direction includes: developing a roadmapfor laser-plasma acceleration beyond 1 GeV; a debate over injection andguiding; benchmarking simulations with improved wake diagnostics;petawatt laser technology for future laser-plasmaaccelerators.

Leemans, Wim P.; Downer, Michael; Siders, Craig

2006-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

343

Report of the MIT Global Environment Initiative Planning Group John H. Lienhard V  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Report of the MIT Global Environment Initiative Planning Group John H. Lienhard V Samuel C. Collins Professor of Mechanical Engineering Maria Charge from Provost Reif The Global Environment Initiative Planning Group is charged

Reif, Rafael

344

U.S.-India Coal Working Group Terms of Reference | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

U.S.-India Coal Working Group Terms of Reference U.S.-India Coal Working Group Terms of Reference U.S.-India Coal Working Group Terms of Reference More Documents & Publications...

345

September 2012, HSS Focus Group Strategic Initiatives Work Group - Status Overviews  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Strategic Initiatives Work Group Status Overview Strategic Initiatives Work Group Status Overview Accomplishments: 1. June 26. Telecom with USW - Informative near-miss occurrence reporting. 2. June 29. HS-24 finalized and released the Injury and Illness Dashboard. 3. July 30. Meeting held to reconfirm the priorities of and a path forward for the HSS Union Strategic Initiatives WG. - Discussed worker safety and reporting issues and confirmed that reporting and recording would be the near-term focus of the group. - The recent release of the Injury and Illness Dashboard as a tool for easily exploring DOE occupational safety and health injury and illness information was also highlighted. 4. Aug 29 - 31. HSS Analysis Lead (Steve Domotor) attended USW's DOE Worker

346

Remedial Action Work Plan Amchitka Island Mud Pit Closures  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This remedial action work plan presents the project organization and construction procedures developed for the performance of the remedial actions at U.S. Department of Energy (DOE's) sites on Amchitka Island, Alaska. During the late1960s and early 1970s, the U.S. Department of Defense and the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (the predecessor agency to DOE) used Amchitka Island as a site for underground nuclear tests. A total of nine sites on the Island were considered for nuclear testing; however, tests were only conducted at three sites (i.e., Long Shot in 1965, Milrow in 1969, and Cannikin in 1971). In addition to these three sites, large diameter emplacement holes were drilled in two other locations (Sites D and F) and an exploratory hole was in a third location (Site E). It was estimated that approximately 195 acres were disturbed by drilling or preparation for drilling in conjunction with these activities. The disturbed areas include access roads, spoil-disposal areas, mud pits which have impacted the environment, and an underground storage tank at the hot mix plant which was used to support asphalt-paving operations on the island. The remedial action objective for Amchitka Island is to eliminate human and ecological exposure to contaminants by capping drilling mud pits, removing the tank contents, and closing the tank in place. The remedial actions will meet State of Alaska regulations, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service refuge management goals, address stakeholder concerns, and address the cultural beliefs and practices of the native people. The U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office will conduct work on Amchitka Island under the authority of the Comprehensive Emergency Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. Field activities are scheduled to take place May through September 2001. The results of these activities will be presented in a subsequent Closure Report.

DOE/NV

2001-04-05T23:59:59.000Z

347

DOE-EERE Durability Working Group Meeting, October 10, 2010  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE-EERE Durability Working Group Meeting October 10, 2010 Agenda 6 pm Welcome and introductory comments Debbie Myers (Argonne) and Rod Borup (Los Alamos) - co-chairs 6:15 pm Overview of electrocatalyst and support degradation mechanisms Sarah Ball, Johnson Matthey Fuel Cells 6:45 pm Discussion/presentations by project PIs/representatives (5-10 minutes each) * Overview of electrocatalyst and support degradation aspects of projects * Protocols/testing procedures/diagnostics used to resolve the electrocatalyst and support degradation mechanisms * Ballard, Nuvera, LANL-Borup, Argonne, DuPont, UTC Power, LANL-Mukund, NREL, HNEI, 3M 8:15 pm Discussion on relevance and impact of degradation studies of each stack component Led by Rod Borup Discussion on standardized generic start-up and shut-down protocols

348

Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop: Code for Hydrogen Pipelines  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Code for Hydrogen Code for Hydrogen Pipelines Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop Augusta, Georgia August 31, 2005 Louis Hayden, PE Chair ASME B31.12 3 Presentation Outline * Approval for new code development * Charge from BPTCS to B31 Standards Committee for Hydrogen Piping/Pipeline code development * B31.12 Status & Structure * Hydrogen Pipeline issues * Research Needs * Where Do We Go From Here? 4 Code for Hydrogen Piping and Pipelines * B31 Hydrogen Section Committee to develop a new code for H 2 piping and pipelines - Include requirements specific to H 2 service for power, process, transportation, distribution, commercial, and residential applications - Balance reference and incorporation of applicable sections of B31.1, B31.3 and B31.8 - Have separate parts for industrial, commercial/residential

349

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Spring 2009 Meeting Welcome  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Biloxi, Ms Biloxi, Ms Beau Rivage Resort, Hotel and Casino Thank You Mississippi Power Thank You Joe Bosco Don't forget the suntan lotion 1 Washington Update Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Biloxi, Mississippi David McAndrew Federal Energy Management Program May 5, 2009 Be Present and Participate Please turn off cell phones and blackberries We will have lots of breaks for you If you really need to take a call or use your blackberry please step outside Also remember the FUPWG code of Conduct Oh Yea, try and have a little fun! 3 FUPWG Ground Rules 4 * Changes to FEMP Organization, Structure, & Services * FEMP EISA Section 432 Guidance * ARRA Update * Update on Utility Sector EERE Spending Outline Facilitate the Federal Government's implementation of sound, cost-effective energy

350

Working Group Reports A Short-Wave Radiometer Array Across  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 9 Working Group Reports A Short-Wave Radiometer Array Across the Tropical Pacific Ocean as a Component of the TOGA-TAO Buoy Array R. M. Reynolds Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, New York Introduction The purpose of this document is to bring together pertinent information concerning the NOAA TOGA-TAO buoy array so that a decision can be made for the following questions: 1. Are the scientific gains from an array of short-wave radiation sensors in the equatorial Pacific Ocean sufficiently impelling that DOE/ARM should provide financial and material support to NOAA/PMEL to install and operate this array? 2. What scientists and/or scientific studies would directly benefit from such a data set? 3. What should that array look like? That is, what sub-set of buoys should be so implemented given the per-buoy

351

DOE Durability Working Group May 2012 Meeting Agenda  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE Durability Working Group (DWG) Monday, May 14, 2012, 8:00-10:00 am Gateway Salon I, Crystal Gateway Marriott Crystal City, VA Meeting Agenda 8:00 am Welcome and introductory comments Debbie Myers (Argonne) and Rod Borup (Los Alamos) - co-chairs 8:05 am New Durability Test protocols proposed by FCCJ Atsushi OHMA, Manager, Advanced Materials Laboratory, Nissan Research Center, Nissan Motor Company, Ltd. 8:40 am Metal Bipolar Plate Degradation Mechanisms and AST Development Rod Borup, Rangachary Mukundan, LANL 9:00 am DWG Durability Protocols - results and finalizing Debbie Myers - contributions from others 9:20 am Report on progress on action items from Fall, 2011 DWG meeting Rod Borup and Debbie Myers 9:40 am Wrap-up, discussion of "output" from DWG, discussion of result and model

352

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group - Utility Interconnection Panel  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

WORKING GROUP - Utility Interconnection Panel M. Renee Jewell, Program/Energy Manager, & Contracting Officer, Forest Service (reneejewell@fs.fed.us) SCENARIO: Fed Agencies had Solar PV Projects To Connect with Utility in California * United States (US) Forest Service (FS) - 1 small Solar Photovoltaic (PV) project; and - 1 small Renewable project (Solar PV) exporting energy to grid. * U.S. National Park Service (NPS) - 24 Small Solar Photovoltaic projects. * U.S. Dept. of Veterans Affairs (VA) - 6 Renewable generation projects of different sizes. FS Region 5 (California) - Solar Photovoltaic Installations Solar PV Project @ Mono Lake Visitor Center (Inyo NF) Solar PV Project (net exporter) @ San Dimas Technology and Development Center SITUATION - Utility Wanted Feds to Sign Its

353

INDIAN COUNTRY ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKING GROUP ICEIWG  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 21, 2012 NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA Wyndham Garden Hotel-Baronne Plaza 201 Baronne Street New Orleans, LA 70112 (504) 522-0083 AGENDA MEETING ROOM - MAGNOLIA ROOM WEDNESDAY, MARCH 21, 2012 4:30pm - 6:30pm INTERNAL WORKING GROUP SESSION FOR ICEIWG MEMBERS ICEIWG Members and Alternates  Rodney Bordeaux, Chairman, Rosebud Sioux Tribe  Barney Enos, Jr., District 4 Community Council, Gila River Indian Community  Jim Manion, Warm Springs Power, Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon  Will Micklin, CEO, Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay Indians  Mato Standing High, Attorney General, Rosebud Sioux Tribe  Ronald Suppah, Vice Chairman Tribal Council, Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon

354

Summary of the Working Group on Spin Physics  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

A summary is given of the experimental and theoretical results presented in the working group on spin physics. New data on inclusive and semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering, combined with theoretical studies of the polarized distribution functions of nucleons, were presented. Many talks addressed the relatively new subjects of transversity distributions and generalized parton distributions. These distributions can be studied by measuring single spin asymmetries, while partonic intrinsic motion and models of new spin dependent distribution and fragmentation functions are needed to obtain the corresponding theoretical description. These subjects are not only studied in deep-inelastic lepton scattering, but also in polarized proton-proton collisions at RHIC. A selection of results that have been obtained in these experiments together with several associated theoretical ideas are presented in this paper. In conclusion, a brief sketch is given of the prospects for experimental and theoretical studies of the spin structure of the nucleon in the coming years.

Mauro Anselmino; Gerard van der Steenhoven

2003-09-11T23:59:59.000Z

355

DOE Durability Working Group May 2011 Meeting Agenda  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE Durability Working Group Wednesday, May 11, 2011, 7:00-10:00 pm Marriott Crystal Gateway "Salon V" (Ballroom Level) Meeting Agenda 7:00 pm Welcome and introductory comments Debbie Myers (Argonne) and Rod Borup (Los Alamos) - co-chairs 7:10 pm Compilation of decay mechanisms, impact, evidence, and diagnostic procedures Proposed by: Adam Weber (LBNL), Mike Perry (UTRC) Assigned to: Debbie Myers, Rod Borup, Rangachary Mukundan (LANL) 7:30 pm PEFC start-up protocol Assigned to: Greg James (Ballard) - lead, Rod Borup (LANL), Mike Perry (UTRC) 7:50 pm Accelerated stress test for non-carbon supports (e.g., metal oxides) Proposed by: Shyam Kocha (NREL), Assigned to: Shyam Kocha (NREL) - lead Mahlon Wilson and Eric Brosha (LANL) 8:10 pm Discussion of electrochemical equivalent of accelerated stress test for MEAs

356

Proceedings of the IEA Working Group meeting on ferritic/martensitic steels  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

An IEA working group on ferritic/martensitic steels for fusion applications, consisting of researchers from Japan, European Union, USA, and Switzerland, met at the headquarters of the Joint European Torus, Culham, UK. At the meeting, preliminary data generated on the large heats of steels purchased for the IEA program and on other heats of steels were presented and discussed. Second purpose of the meeting was to continue planning and coordinating the collaborative test program in progress on reduced-activation ferritic/martensitic steels. The majority of this report consists of viewographs for the presentations.

Klueh, R.L.

1996-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

357

Microsoft Word - s05822_LEHR_WorkPlan  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Travel Time Estimates for Constituents of Concern Travel Time Estimates for Constituents of Concern This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy LEHR Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan November 2010 Doc. No. S05822-0.0 Page C-1 Table C-1. Estimated Contaminant Migration Travel Time from DOE Areas to Monitoring Wells DOE Area Monitoring Well Distance from DOE Area Boundary to Monitoring Well (feet) Constituent Kd a (ml/g) Retardation factor b (unitless) Estimated Travel Time Range c (years) Domestic Septic System- 1 UCD1-071 15 Aluminum 9.9 55 28 276 Domestic Septic System- 3 UCD1-069 15 Formaldehyde 0.0018 1.0 0.50 5.0 15 Molybdenum 20 111 55 553 15 Nitrate 0 1.0 0.50 5.0 15 Aluminum 9.9 55 28 276 15 Silver 8.3 47 23 233 Domestic Septic System- 4 UCD1-068 60 Selenium 300 1,646 3,293 32,929

358

Microsoft Word - s05822_LEHR_WorkPlan  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Reporting Limits Reporting Limits This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy LEHR Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan November 2010 Doc. No. S05822-0.0 Page F-1 Table F-1. Reporting Limits for Monitoring Parameters, DOE LEHR Parameter Method Reference Laboratory Reporting Limit MDL Units Aluminum EPA 6020A CalScience Environmental Lab 10.5 50 µg/L Antimony EPA 6020A CalScience Environmental Lab 1 0.38 µg/L Arsenic EPA 6020A CalScience Environmental Lab 1 0.589 µg/L Barium EPA 6020A CalScience Environmental Lab 1 0.105 µg/L Beryllium EPA 6020A CalScience Environmental Lab 1 0.131 µg/L Cadmium EPA 6020A CalScience Environmental Lab 1 0.266 µg/L Chromium, total EPA 6020A CalScience Environmental Lab 1 0.618 µg/L Cobalt EPA 6020A CalScience Environmental Lab 1 0.14 µg/L

359

Final work plan for targeted investigation at Hilton, Kansas.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Work Plan outlines the scope of a targeted investigation to update the status of carbon tetrachloride contamination in groundwater associated with grain storage operations at Hilton, Kansas. The Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC), an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), operated a grain storage facility in Hilton during the 1950s and 1960s. At the time of the CCC/USDA operation in Hilton, grain storage facilities (CCC/USDA and private) were located along the both sides of the former Union Pacific railroad tracks (Figure 1.1). The main grain storage structures were on or near the railroad right-of-way. The proposed targeted investigation, to be conducted by Argonne National Laboratory on the behalf of CCC/USDA, will supplement Argonne's Phase I and Phase II investigations in 1996-1997. The earlier investigations erroneously focused on an area east of the railroad property where the CCC/USDA did not operate, specifically on a private grain storage facility. In addition, the investigation was limited in scope, because access to railroad property was denied (Argonne 1997a,b). The hydrogeologic system at Hilton is potentially complex.

LaFreniere, L. M.; Environmental Science Division

2007-08-28T23:59:59.000Z

360

Egypt-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Egypt Northern Africa References LCGP support1 Low Carbon Growth Plans Advancing Good Practice, August 20092 Overview "Achieving development goals depends on enabling poorer...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "group work plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Minutes of the October 2008 Meeting of the High Temperature Membrane Working Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Meeting minutes of the High Temperature Membrane Working Group from October 16, 2008, in Honolulu, Hawaii.

362

Proceedings of the IEA working group meeting on ferritic/martensitic steels  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

An International Energy Agency (IEA) working group consist- ng of researchers from Japan, the European Union (EU), and the United States, met at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) 16 February 1995 to continue planning a collaborative test program on reduced-activation ferritic/martensitic steels for fusion applications. Plates from a 5-ton, a 1-ton, and three 150 kg heats of reduced-activation martensitic steels have been melted and processed to 7.5- and 15-mm plates in Japan. Plates were delivered in 1994 to the three parties that will participate in the test program. A second 5-ton IEA heat of modified F82H steel was produced in Japan in late 1994, and it was processed into 15- and 25-mm plates, which are to be shipped in February, 1995. Weldments will be produced on plates from this heat, and they will be shipped in April, 1995. At the ORNL meeting, a detailed test program and schedule was presented by the EU representatives, and less detailed programs were presented by the Japanese and US representatives. Detailed program schedules are required from the latter two programs to complete the program planning stage. A meeting is planned for 19--20 September 1995 in Switzerland to continue the planning and coordination of the test program and to present the preliminary results obtained in the collaboration.

Klueh, R.L.

1995-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

363

RISMC ADVANCED SAFETY ANALYSIS WORKING PLAN FY 2015 FY 2019  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

SUMMARY In this report, the Advanced Safety Analysis Program (ASAP) objectives and value proposition is described. ASAP focuses on modernization of nuclear power safety analysis (tools, methods and data); implementing state-of-the-art modeling techniques (which include, for example, enabling incorporation of more detailed physics as they become available); taking advantage of modern computing hardware; and combining probabilistic and mechanistic analyses to enable a risk informed safety analysis process. The modernized tools will maintain the current high level of safety in our nuclear power plant fleet, while providing an improved understanding of safety margins and the critical parameters that affect them. Thus, the set of tools will provide information to inform decisions on plant modifications, refurbishments, and surveillance programs, while improving economics. The set of tools will also benefit the design of new reactors, enhancing safety per unit cost of a nuclear plant. As part of the discussion, we have identified three sets of stakeholders, the nuclear industry, the Department of Energy (DOE), and associated oversight organizations. These three groups would benefit from ASAP in different ways. For example, within the DOE complex, the possible applications that are seen include the safety of experimental reactors, facility life extension, safety-by-design in future generation advanced reactors, and managing security for the storage of nuclear material. This report provides information in five areas: 1. A value proposition (why is this important?) that will make the case for stakeholders use of the ASAP research and development (R&D) products. 2. An identification of likely end users and pathway to adoption of enhanced tools by the end-users. 3. A proposed set of practical and achievable use case demonstrations. 4. A proposed plan to address ASAP verification and validation (V&V) needs. 5. A proposed schedule for the multi-year ASAP.

Ronaldo H. Szilard; Curtis L. Smith

2014-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

364

Energy technology assessments for energy security -- Working Group report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In the first phase of the evaluation process the group identified technology areas that are clearly important for reducing US vulnerability to oil supply disruptions. The important technologies were then evaluated against the following specific criteria: Additions to world oil and gas reserves outside the Middle East; increase in efficiency in the oil consuming sectors; displacement of petroleum-based fuels; reduction in demand for oil-fueled transportation; increase in the ability to switch quickly away from petroleum based fuels; increases in domestic and international oil stocks; reduction in world oil demand; and additions to domestic, non-petroleum electrical generating capacity (important in the ultimate term). The technology areas deemed by the members of the working group to be most important are: (1) In the near term, technologies related to improved recovery of natural gas, the conversion of natural gas to liquids, advanced liquefaction of coal, the development of alternatively fueled vehicles, automobiles and light truck improvements to increase efficiency, and vehicles that operate on alternative fuels. (2) In the long term, these technologies, as well as those related to hydrogen production, storage and utilization, biomass derived fuels, electric and hybrid vehicles, building heating and cooling using solar energy, more efficient appliances, improved HVAC, and advanced building materials and envelopes were also judged to be most important. (3) In the ultimate term (>2030) other technologies have the possibility to join with these to increase energy security. These are improved oil and gas exploration and extraction, heavy oil and hydrocarbon conversion, gas recovery from unconventional sources, advanced fission reactors and fuel cycles, solar generation of electricity, and fusion energy. An increase in US electrical generating capacity is also thought to bear directly on energy security in this time-frame.

Lamont, A.D.; Schock, R.N.

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

365

Status Update on Action 2a: Implementation Handbook for Activity-level Work Planning and Control  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Slide Presentation by James Winter, NA-00-10. DOE Handbook: Implementing Activity-Level Work Planning & Control at Nuclear Facilities. Project Justification Statement submitted 1-29-13, with focus upon improved implementation of WP&C and activity-level work. Provides the background, project plan, and key elements of a new DOE handbook on implementing activity-level work planning and control at DOE nuclear facilities.

366

REPORT FROM THE SCIENTIFIC WORKING GROUP FOR FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY:  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......Toxicology This standard has been adopted...reflect a minimum standard of practice. Laboratories...an implementation plan that is conducive...and organized review and analysis of...knowledge through data mining strategies, access...and international standards. Investigators......

Scientific Working Group for Forensic Toxicology (SWGTOX) Recommendations of the Research; Development; Testing; Evaluation Committee

2013-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

367

The Translational Research Working Group Developmental Pathway for Interventive Devices  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...representing creation of the modality itself (green) as well as development of two different...various developers may well have different business objectives and strategies. Exceptions...therapy requires careful planning to direct energy to tumor tissue while largely sparing...

Gary S. Dorfman; Theodore S. Lawrence; and Lynn M. Matrisian

2008-09-15T23:59:59.000Z

368

Hanford Advisory Board FY2014 Work Plan - "A" List - RAP ISSUE...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

(see draft ORPRL work planning list) Advice PIC, RAP, TWC RAP IMs: Mattson Peltier Heacock Larsen* Pollet Public Understanding of...topic Involving an informed public...

369

Lesson Learned by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Activity-level Work Planning and Control  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Slide Presentation by Donna J. Governor, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Lessons Learned by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Activity-Level Work Planning & Control.

370

Review of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Work Planning and Control...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Independent Oversight Review of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Work Planning and Control Activities April 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of...

371

Report of the APS Neutrino Study Reactor Working Group  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The worldwide program to understand neutrino oscillations and determine the neutrino mixing parameters, CP violating effects, and mass hierarchy will require a broad combination of measurements. The group believes that a key element of this future neutrino program is a multi-detector neutrino experiment (with baselines of {approx} 200 m and {approx} 1.5 km) with a sensitivity of sin{sup 2} 2{theta}{sub 13} = 0.01. In addition to oscillation physics, the reactor experiment may provide interesting measurements of sin{sup 2} {theta}{sub W} at Q{sup 2} = 0, neutrino couplings, magnetic moments, and mixing with sterile neutrino states. {theta}{sub 13} is one of the twenty-six parameters of the standard model, the best model of electroweak interactions for energies below 100 GeV and, as such, is worthy of a precision measurement independent of other considerations. A reactor experiment of the proposed sensitivity will allow a measurement of {theta}{sub 13} with no ambiguities and significantly better precision than any other proposed experiment, or will set limits indicating the scale of future experiments required to make progress. Figure 1 shows a comparison of the sensitivity of reactor experiments of different scales with accelerator experiments for setting limits on sin{sup 2} 2{theta}{sub 13} if the mixing angle is very small, or for making a measurement of sin{sup 2} 2{theta}{sub 13} if the angle is observable. A reactor experiment with a 1% precision may also resolve the degeneracy in the {theta}{sub 23} parameter when combined with long-baseline accelerator experiments. In combination with long-baseline measurements, a reactor experiment may give early indications of CP violation and the mass hierarchy. The combination of the T2K and Nova long-baseline experiments will be able to make significant measurements of these effects if sin{sup 2} 2{theta}{sub 13} > 0.05 and with enhanced beam rates can improve their reach to the sin{sup 2} 2{theta}{sub 13} > 0.02 level. If {theta}{sub 13} turns out to be smaller than these values, one will need other strategies for getting to the physics. Thus, an unambiguous reactor measurement of {theta}{sub 13} is an important ingredient in planning the strategy for the future neutrino program.

Abouzaid, E.; Anderson, K.; Barenboim, G.; Berger, B.; Blucher, E.; Bolton, T.; Choubey, S.; Conrad, J.; Formaggio, J.; Freedman, S.; Finely, D.; Fisher, P.; Fujikawa, B.; Gai, M.; Goodman, M.; de Goueva, A.; Hadley, N.; Hahn, R.; Horton-Smith, G.; Kadel, R.; Kayser, B.; Heeger, K.; Klein, J.; Learned, J.; Lindner, M.; Link, J.; Luk, K.-B.; McKeown, R.; Mocioiu, I.; Mohapatra, R.; Naples, D.; Peng, J.; Petcov, S.; Pilcher, J.; Rapidis, P.; Reyna, D.; Shaevitz, M.; Shrock, R.; Stanton, N.; Stefanski, R.; Yamamoto, R.; Worcester, M.

2004-10-28T23:59:59.000Z

372

Site Characterization Work Plan for Gasbuggy, New Mexico  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Project Gasbuggy was the first of three joint government-industry experiments conducted to test the effectiveness of nuclear explosives to fracture deeply buried, low-permeability natural gas reservoirs to stimulate production. The scope of this work plan is to document the environmental objectives and the proposed technical site investigation strategies that will be utilized for the site characterization of the Project Gasbuggy Site. Its goal is the collection of data in sufficient quantity and quality to determine current site conditions, support a risk assessment for the site surfaces, and evaluate if further remedial action is required to achieve permanent closure of the site that is both protective of human health and the environment. The Gasbuggy Site is located approximately 55 air miles east of Farmington, New Mexico, in Rio Arriba County within the Carson National Forest in the northeast portion of the San Juan Basin. Historically, Project Gasbuggy consisted of the joint government-industry detonation of a nuclear device on December 10, 1967, followed by reentry drilling and gas production testing and project evaluation activities in post-detonation operations from 1967 to 1976. Based on historical documentation, no chemical release sites other than the mud pits were identified; additionally, there was no material buried at the Gasbuggy Site other than drilling fluids and construction debris. Although previous characterization and restoration activities including sensitive species surveys, cultural resources surveys, surface geophysical surveys, and limited soil sampling and analysis were performed in 1978 and again in 2000, no formal closure of the site was achieved. Also, these efforts did not adequately address the site's potential for chemical contamination at the surface/shallow subsurface ground levels or the subsurface hazards for potential migration outside of the current site subsurface intrusion restrictions. Additional investigation activities will focus on the surface/shallow subsurface sampling and modeling. Suspected potential contaminants of concern for investigative analysis at the Gasbuggy Site include total petroleum hydrocarbons (diesel- and gasoline-range), volatile organic compounds, semivolatile organic compounds, total Resource Conservation and Recovery Act metals, and radionuclides. The results of this characterization and risk assessment will be used to evaluate corrective action alternatives to include no further action, the implementation of institutional controls, capping on site, or off-site disposal of contaminated waste which will be presented in a subsequent corrective action decision document.

DOE/NV

2000-12-14T23:59:59.000Z

373

Microsoft Word - Security TG Work Plan 8-7-06.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7/2006 7/2006 Page 1 of 5 WORK PLAN FOR THE DOE TEC SECURITY TOPIC GROUP (STG) Status: Active DOE Leads: Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM), Office of Logistics Management (OLM), Alex Thrower Start Date: September 21, 2004 Purpose: The purpose of the Security Topic Group (STG) is to assist the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) in developing an approach for effective safeguards and security of nuclear waste shipments to Yucca Mountain, Nevada. This approach will incorporate best practices and lessons learned from previous domestic and international nuclear waste shipments, with special emphasis on substantive contributions from the State, Tribal, and local governments that will be involved in these shipments.

374

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

establishes partnerships and facilitates communications among Federal agencies, utilities, and energy service companies. The group develops strategies to implement...

375

May 21, 2012, Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Focus Group Strategic Initiatives Work Group Charter  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Strategic Initiatives Work Group Charter Strategic Initiatives Work Group Charter In an ongoing effort to further the improvement of health, safety, environmental, and security performance within the Department's contractor work force, DOE is engaged in the establishment of work groups to pursue health and safety improvements across the DOE Complex. These efforts support DOE's responsibility as owner/manager to protect its greatest asset: the worker. The work group supports DOE's integrated safety management system and further DOE's best interests by fostering worker involvement and partnerships to maximize continuity of operations and the success of the Department's national security mission.

376

Group Work Support for the BlueJ IDE Kasper Fisker  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

@deakin.edu.au ABSTRACT Learning to work in teams is essential for every software professional. Developing softwareGroup Work Support for the BlueJ IDE Kasper Fisker fisker@fiskers.org Michael Kölling Computing. Starting effective group work practices early can lead to better acceptance of group work as a standard

Kent, University of

377
378

Review of the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Work Planning and Control Activities Prior to Work Execution, January 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Review of the Review of the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Work Planning and Control Activities Prior to Work Execution January 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Scope.................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background........................................................................................................................................... 1

379

Employment Information for Master of Urban Planning Graduates Working  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Housing Alliance Baton Rogue, LA Michigan Community Detroit, MI Michigan Suburbs Alliance Detroit, MI of Dallas Dallas, TX City of Detroit Detroit, MI City of Milwaukee Milwaukee, WI City of Portland Portland Maryland State Highway Administration Baltimore, MD Metropolitan Area Planning Council Boston, MA Michigan

Papalambros, Panos

380

Report of the Solar and Atmospheric Neutrino Working Group  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The highest priority of the Solar and Atmospheric Neutrino Experiment Working Group is the development of a real-time, precision experiment that measures the pp solar neutrino flux. A measurement of the pp solar neutrino flux, in comparison with the existing precision measurements of the high energy {sup 8}B neutrino flux, will demonstrate the transition between vacuum and matter-dominated oscillations, thereby quantitatively testing a fundamental prediction of the standard scenario of neutrino flavor transformation. The initial solar neutrino beam is pure {nu}{sub e}, which also permits sensitive tests for sterile neutrinos. The pp experiment will also permit a significantly improved determination of {theta}{sub 12} and, together with other solar neutrino measurements, either a measurement of {theta}{sub 13} or a constraint a factor of two lower than existing bounds. In combination with the essential pre-requisite experiments that will measure the {sup 7}Be solar neutrino flux with a precision of 5%, a measurement of the pp solar neutrino flux will constitute a sensitive test for non-standard energy generation mechanisms within the Sun. The Standard Solar Model predicts that the pp and {sup 7}Be neutrinos together constitute more than 98% of the solar neutrino flux. The comparison of the solar luminosity measured via neutrinos to that measured via photons will test for any unknown energy generation mechanisms within the nearest star. A precise measurement of the pp neutrino flux (predicted to be 92% of the total flux) will also test stringently the theory of stellar evolution since the Standard Solar Model predicts the pp flux with a theoretical uncertainty of 1%. We also find that an atmospheric neutrino experiment capable of resolving the mass hierarchy is a high priority. Atmospheric neutrino experiments may be the only alternative to very long baseline accelerator experiments as a way of resolving this fundamental question. Such an experiment could be a very large scale water Cerenkov detector, or a magnetized detector with flavor and antiflavor sensitivity. Additional priorities are nuclear physics measurements which will reduce the uncertainties in the predictions of the Standard Solar Model, and similar supporting measurements for atmospheric neutrinos (cosmic ray fluxes, magnetic fields, etc.). We note as well that the detectors for both solar and atmospheric neutrino measurements can serve as multipurpose detectors, with capabilities of discovering dark matter, relic supernova neutrinos, proton decay, or as targets for long baseline accelerator neutrino experiments.

Back, H.; Bahcall, J.N.; Bernabeu, J.; Boulay, M.G.; Bowles, T.; Calaprice, F.; Champagne, A.; Freedman, S.; Gai, M.; Galbiati, C.; Gallagher, H.; Gonzalez-Garcia, C.; Hahn, R.L.; Heeger, K.M.; Hime, A.; Jung, C.K.; Klein, J.R.; Koike, M.; Lanou, R.; Learned, J.G.; Lesko, K.T.; Losecco, J.; Maltoni, M.; Mann, A.; McKinsey, D.; Palomares-Ruiz, S.; Pena-Garay, C.; Petcov, S.T.; Piepke, A.; Pitt, M.; Raghavan, R.; Robertson, R.G.H.; Scholberg, K.; Sobel, H.W.; Takeuchi, T.; Vogelaar, R.; Wolfenstein, L.

2004-10-22T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "group work plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Examining Group Work: Implications for the Digital Library as Sharium  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Digital libraries have the potential to be rich interactive ... the need for a complex system that intertwines public and private work space. Currently DLs provide only one tool ...

Sandra Toze; Elaine G. Toms

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

382

North American Energy Work Group Releases Updated Trilateral...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

efficiency, regulatory cooperation, and hydrocarbons. The SPP strengthens North America's energy markets by working together, according to our respective legal frameworks, to...

383

Summary for Policymakers IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Working Group III  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

this introduction: Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission trends 2. Global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have grown sinceincrease in atmospheric GHG concentrations [1.3; Working

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

384

Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Work Plan for Fiscal Year 1989.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The FY 1989 Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Work Plan (Work Plan) presents Bonneville Power Administration's plans for implementing the Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program (Program) in FY 1989. The Work Plan focuses on individual Action Items found in the 1987 Program for which Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has determined that it has authority and responsibility to implement. Each of the entries in the Work Plan includes objectives, background, and progress to date in achieving those objectives, and a summary of plans for implementation in FY 1989. Most Action Items are implemented through one or more BPA-funded projects. Each Action Item entry is followed by a list of completed, ongoing, and planned projects, along with objectives, results, schedules, and milestones for each project. The FY 1989 Work Plan emphasizes continuation of 113 projects, most of which involve protection, mitigation, or enhancement of anadromous fishery resources. BPA also plans to start 20 new projects in FY 1989. The number of ongoing FY 1988 projects to be continued in FY 1989 and the number of new projects planned to start in FY 1989 are based on current (September 7, 1988) procurement expectations. Several projects presently in BPA's procurement process are expected to be contracted by September 30, 1988, the last day of FY 1988. Although these projects have not yet started, they have been listed in the Work Plan as ongoing FY 1988 projects, based on projected start dates in late September 1988. Throughout the Work Plan, those projects with projected start dates in September 1988 have been noted.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration. Division of Fish and Wildlife.

1988-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

385

Activity-Level Work Planning and Control Implementation  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Such metrics may then be monitored and analyzed to assess program performance. The Energy Facility Contractors Group (EFCOG) Integrated Safety Management (ISM)Quality...

386

Dealing with the effects of context mismatch in group work  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The context concept can be used with advantage in the area of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. In many studies, several forms of context have been used without explicit association to the context concept. This paper attempts to clarify the relationship ... Keywords: Awareness, Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Context, Context framework, Contextual knowledge, Groupware

Marcos R. S. Borges; Patrick Brzillon; Jos A. Pino; Jean-Charles Pomerol

2007-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

387

DOE OIG Recovery Act Work Plan (FY 2011).xls  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

OIG Recovery Act Plan Overview OIG Recovery Act Plan Overview OIG Name: Department of Energy Office of Inspector General OIG Broad Recovery Act Goals: The primary objective of the Office of Inspector General's oversight strategy involves the implementation of a review, evaluation, and investigation protocol designed to assist the Department of Energy in: (1) maximizing the performance and effectiveness of activities related to the Recovery Act; (2) preventing and detecting the fraudulent misuse of Recovery Act funds; and (3) identifying opportunities for cost savings in Recovery Act-related programs. OIG Broad Training and Outreach Recovery Act Goals: Since the passage of the Recovery Act, the Office of Inspector General has initiated an aggressive schedule to provide targeted fraud awareness briefings to

388

The QCD/SM working group: Summary report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Quantum Chromo-Dynamics (QCD), and more generally the physics of the Standard Model (SM), enter in many ways in high energy processes at TeV Colliders, and especially in hadron colliders (the Tevatron at Fermilab and the forthcoming LHC at CERN), First of all, at hadron colliders, QCD controls the parton luminosity, which rules the production rates of any particle or system with large invariant mass and/or large transverse momentum. Accurate predictions for any signal of possible ''New Physics'' sought at hadron colliders, as well as the corresponding backgrounds, require an improvement in the control of uncertainties on the determination of PDF and of the propagation of these uncertainties in the predictions. Furthermore, to fully exploit these new types of PDF with uncertainties, uniform tools (computer interfaces, standardization of the PDF evolution codes used by the various groups fitting PDF's) need to be proposed and developed. The dynamics of colour also affects, both in normalization and shape, various observables of the signals of any possible ''New Physics'' sought at the TeV scale, such as, e.g. the production rate, or the distributions in transverse momentum of the Higgs boson. Last, but not least, QCD governs many backgrounds to the searches for this ''New Physics''. Large and important QCD corrections may come from extra hard parton emission (and the corresponding virtual corrections), involving multi-leg and/or multi-loop amplitudes. This requires complex higher order calculations, and new methods have to be designed to compute the required multi-legs and/or multi-loop corrections in a tractable form. In the case of semi-inclusive observables, logarithmically enhanced contributions coming from multiple soft and collinear gluon emission require sophisticated QCD resummation techniques. Resummation is a catch-all name for efforts to extend the predictive power of QCD by summing the large logarithmic corrections to all orders in perturbation theory. In practice, the resummation formalism depends on the observable at issue, through the type of logarithm to be resummed, and the resummation methods. In parallel with this perturbative QCD-oriented working programme, the implementation of both QCD/SM and New physics in Monte Carlo event generators is confronted with a number of issues which deserve uniformization or improvements. The important issues are: (1) the problem of interfacing partonic event generators to showering Monte-Carlos; (2) an implementation using this interface to calculate backgrounds which are poorly simulated by the showering Monte-Carlos alone; (3) a comparison of the HERWIG and PYTHIA parton shower models with the predictions of soft gluon resummation; (4) studies of the underlying events at hadron colliders to check how well they are modeled by the Monte-Carlo generators.

W. Giele et al.

2004-01-12T23:59:59.000Z

389

Civil Works Planning Overview Civil Works (CW) Planning offers a structured, rational approach to solving water resources  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

and interrelated processes of social, economic, cultural, environmental and political change at every scale from values inherent in any solution and shape recommendations. · CW Planning is a creative process requiring knowledge of water resources laws and regulations, public involvement methods and processes, engineering

US Army Corps of Engineers

390

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting: Summary...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

projects and work being presented. Romesh Kumar (ANL) presented the agenda, led the self- identification of those present in the room and the participants who were calling in, and...

391

Integrated Safety Management System as the Basis for Work Planning and Control for Research and Development  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Slide Presentation by Rich Davies, Kami Lowry, Mike Schlender, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) and Ted Pietrok, Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO). Integrated Safety Management System as the Basis for Work Planning and Control for Research and Development. Work Planning and Control (WP&C) is essential to assuring the safety of workers and the public regardless of the scope of work Research and Development (R&D) activities are no exception.

392

IAU DIVISION X, XII / COMMISSION 40, 41 / WORKING GROUP on HISTORICAL RADIO ASTRONOMY  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

IAU DIVISION X, XII / COMMISSION 40, 41 / WORKING GROUP on HISTORICAL RADIO ASTRONOMY CHAIR Kenneth. Introduction The IAU Working Group on Historical Radio Astronomy (WGHRA) was formed at the 2003 General Assembly of the IAU as a Joint Working Group of Commissions 40 (Radio Astronomy) and 41 (History

Groppi, Christopher

393

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting Held in Conjunction with the  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting Held in Conjunction with the DOE Hydrogen REPORT Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting June 11, 2008 Crystal Gateway Marriott of the Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group (SSAWG). The objective of these meetings is to bring

394

November 13 - 15, 2012 HSS Work Group Leadership Meeting Summary - Strategic Initiatives  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Strategic Initiatives Work Group Strategic Initiatives Work Group Co-Lead Telecom November 13, 2012 DRAFT Discussion Overview Purpose: This HSS Focus Group Work Group telecom was held with the Work Group Co-Leads to discuss change elements and strategic direction to support accelerated efforts to advancing progress, productivity and performance within each of the Work Groups. Although current roles within all of the Work Groups and Focus Group efforts remain the same, the addition of centralized leadership and oversight by representatives (2) of the Departmental Representative to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board are established. 1. Leadership Transition * Co-Leads will continue to provide technical functions * Functions of the Focus Group Program will remain the same. [Lily/Stephanie]

395

November 13 - 15, 2012 HSS Work Group Leadership Meeting Summary - 851 Implementation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

851 Implementation Work Group 851 Implementation Work Group Co-Lead Telecom November 13, 2012 DRAFT Discussion Overview Purpose: This HSS Focus Group Work Group telecom was held with the Work Group Co-Leads to discuss change elements and strategic direction to support accelerated efforts to advancing progress, productivity and performance within each of the Work Groups. Although current roles within all of the Work Groups and Focus Group efforts remain the same, the addition of centralized leadership and oversight by representatives (2) of the Departmental Representative to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board are established. 1. Leadership Transition * Co-Leads will continue to provide technical functions * Functions of the Focus Group Program will remain the same. [Lily/Stephanie]

396

Office of Enterprise Assessments Targeted Review of Work Planning...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

that includes thorough understanding of the technical basis for the work and a search for failure modes that can cause accidents to occur. Section 5.3 of Manual 471012...

397

Summary of the Optics, IR, Injection, Operations, Reliability and Instrumentation Working Group  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The facilities reported on are all in a fairly mature state of operation, as evidenced by the very detailed studies and correction schemes that all groups are working on. First- and higher-order aberrations are diagnosed and planned to be corrected. Very detailed beam measurements are done to get a global picture of the beam dynamics. More than other facilities the high-luminosity colliders are struggling with experimental background issues, mitigation of which is a permanent challenge. The working group dealt with a very wide rage of practical issues which limit performance of the machines and compared their techniques of operations and their performance. We anticipate this to be a first attempt. In a future workshop in this series, we propose to attempt more fundamental comparisons of each machine, including design parameters. For example, DAPHNE and KEKB employ a finite crossing angle. The minimum value of {beta}*{sub y} attainable at KEKB seems to relate to this scheme. Effectiveness of compensation solenoids and turn-by-turn BPMs etc. should be examined in more detail. In the near future, CESR-C and VEPP-2000 will start their operation. We expect to hear important new experiences from these machines; in particular VEPP-2000 will be the first machine to have adopted round beams. At SLAC and KEK, next generation B Factories are being considered. It will be worthwhile to discuss the design issues of these machines based on the experiences of the existing factory machines.

Wienands, U.; /SLAC; Funakoshi, Y.; /KEK, Tsukuba

2012-04-20T23:59:59.000Z

398

Motion planning algorithms for a group of mobile agents  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

sampling, like the probabilis- tic roadmap (PRM) planners [46, 47] have gained popularity due to their eciency 5 and simplicity. Centralized methods using PRM have been developed for solving the motion planning problem for multiple agents [48, 49...]. The no- tion of coordination diagram was used in [57] and later analyzed for manipulators in [60, 61]. On similar lines roadmap coordination [62, 63] was used to plan the motion of multiple robots. The problem with decoupled approaches is that despite...

Lal, Mayank

2008-10-10T23:59:59.000Z

399

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Seminar: Chairman's Corner  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Chairman's Corner Chairman's Corner May 22, 2013 David McAndrew Utility Project Lead DOE FEMP 2 Welcome To San Francisco  Thank you to PG&E for hosting the 2013 Spring FUPWG Seminar!  Special thanks to Chris Gillis and Matt Bergh  Welcome Webinar Participants!  The first half of todays meeting is available via webinar  Webinar participants are encouraged to send questions and feedback to me at David.McAndrew@ee.doe.gov or Susan Courtney at scourtney@energetics.com  Thanks to the Steering Committee  For new folks they are your ambassadors to the group  Together we decide on topics for future seminars  They lead efforts to resolve issues identified by this group 3 FUPWG Code of Conduct Delegates agree to follow the Federal Utility Partnership

400

[Draft minutes of IAPG Mechanical Working Group meeting  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report provides the draft minutes of the Interagency Advanced Power Group meeting held November 3--4, 1993. Topics addressed are: Materials for thermal management; photovoltaic programs in the Airforce; ground based radar advanced power system development program; battery research; generator prognostics & diagnostics equipment; a thermal flight experiment test program; power systems assessment; Overview: Phillip`s space thermal technologies branch; and development of actuator thermal management.

Skinner, D.M.

1993-12-15T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "group work plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Report of the working group on detector simulation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

An ad hoc group at Snowmass reviewed the need for detector simulation to support detectors at the SSC. This report first reviews currently available programs for detector simulation, both those written for single specific detectors and those aimed at general utility. It then considers the requirements for detector simulation for the SSC, with particular attention to enhancements that are needed relative to present programs. Finally, a list of recommendations is given.

Price, L.E.; Lebrun, P.

1986-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

402

American Society of Mechanical Engineers/Savannah River National Laboratory (ASME/SRNL) Materials and Components for Hydrogen Infrastructure Codes and Standards Workshop and the DOE Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Pipeline Working Group Workshop Pipeline Working Group Workshop September 25-26, 2007 ♦ Center for Hydrogen Research, Aiken, GA WORKSHOP SUMMARY Table of Contents 1. Introduction.............................................................................................................. 1 2. Pipeline Working Group Plans for Round Robin Testing and Routine Research Testing ...................................................................................................... 2 3. Facilitated Discussion on Planned DOE Steel Pipeline Routine Research Testing: ASME and PWG Workshop Participants ............................................. 2 4. Facilitated Discussion on Next Steps for Hydrogen Delivery Research: ASME and PWG Workshop Participants.......................................................................... 4

403

Review of the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Work Planning and Control Activities Prior to Work Execution, January 2013  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Independent Oversight Review of the Independent Oversight Review of the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Work Planning and Control Activities Prior to Work Execution January 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Scope.................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background........................................................................................................................................... 1

404

Brazil-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Brazil-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Brazil-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Jump to: navigation, search Name Brazil-Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Agency/Company /Organization ClimateWorks, Project Catalyst, McKinsey and Company Sector Energy, Land Topics Background analysis, Low emission development planning, Policies/deployment programs Country Brazil South America References LCGP support[1] Low Carbon Growth Plans Advancing Good Practice, August 2009[2] Overview "Achieving development goals depends on enabling poorer countries to accelerate or maintain robust economic growth despite the disproportionate impacts of climate change which they face. The central challenge is to enable all countries to strengthen delivery of their own development visions and goals through low-carbon, climate-resilient, or 'climate

405

Democratic Republic of Congo-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Democratic Republic of Congo-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Democratic Republic of Congo-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Jump to: navigation, search Name Democratic Republic of Congo-Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Agency/Company /Organization ClimateWorks, Project Catalyst, McKinsey and Company Sector Energy, Land Topics Background analysis, Low emission development planning, Policies/deployment programs Country Democratic Republic of Congo Middle Africa References LCGP support[1] Low Carbon Growth Plans Advancing Good Practice, August 2009[2] Overview "Achieving development goals depends on enabling poorer countries to accelerate or maintain robust economic growth despite the disproportionate impacts of climate change which they face. The central challenge is to enable all countries to strengthen delivery of their own development

406

Malaysia-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Malaysia-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Malaysia-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Jump to: navigation, search Name Malaysia-Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Agency/Company /Organization ClimateWorks, Project Catalyst, McKinsey and Company Sector Energy, Land Topics Background analysis, Low emission development planning, Policies/deployment programs Country Malaysia South-Eastern Asia References LCGP support[1] Low Carbon Growth Plans Advancing Good Practice, August 2009[2] Overview "Achieving development goals depends on enabling poorer countries to accelerate or maintain robust economic growth despite the disproportionate impacts of climate change which they face. The central challenge is to enable all countries to strengthen delivery of their own development visions and goals through low-carbon, climate-resilient, or 'climate

407

Guyana-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Guyana-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Guyana-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Jump to: navigation, search Name Guyana-Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Agency/Company /Organization ClimateWorks, Project Catalyst, McKinsey and Company Sector Energy, Land Topics Background analysis, Low emission development planning, Policies/deployment programs Country Guyana South America References LCGP support[1] Low Carbon Growth Plans Advancing Good Practice, August 2009[2] Overview "Achieving development goals depends on enabling poorer countries to accelerate or maintain robust economic growth despite the disproportionate impacts of climate change which they face. The central challenge is to enable all countries to strengthen delivery of their own development visions and goals through low-carbon, climate-resilient, or 'climate

408

Indonesia-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Indonesia-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Indonesia-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Jump to: navigation, search Name Indonesia-Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Agency/Company /Organization ClimateWorks, Project Catalyst, McKinsey and Company Sector Energy, Land Topics Background analysis, Low emission development planning, Policies/deployment programs Country Indonesia South-Eastern Asia References LCGP support[1] Low Carbon Growth Plans Advancing Good Practice, August 2009[2] Overview "Achieving development goals depends on enabling poorer countries to accelerate or maintain robust economic growth despite the disproportionate impacts of climate change which they face. The central challenge is to enable all countries to strengthen delivery of their own development visions and goals through low-carbon, climate-resilient, or 'climate

409

Papua New Guinea-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Papua New Guinea-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Papua New Guinea-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Jump to: navigation, search Name Papua New Guinea-Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Agency/Company /Organization ClimateWorks, Project Catalyst, McKinsey and Company Sector Energy, Land Topics Background analysis, Low emission development planning, Policies/deployment programs Country Papua New Guinea Melanesia References LCGP support[1] Low Carbon Growth Plans Advancing Good Practice, August 2009[2] Overview "Achieving development goals depends on enabling poorer countries to accelerate or maintain robust economic growth despite the disproportionate impacts of climate change which they face. The central challenge is to enable all countries to strengthen delivery of their own development

410

Kenya-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Kenya-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Kenya-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Jump to: navigation, search Name Kenya-Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Agency/Company /Organization ClimateWorks, Project Catalyst, McKinsey and Company Sector Energy, Land Topics Background analysis, Low emission development planning, Policies/deployment programs Country Kenya Eastern Africa References LCGP support[1] Low Carbon Growth Plans Advancing Good Practice, August 2009[2] Overview "Achieving development goals depends on enabling poorer countries to accelerate or maintain robust economic growth despite the disproportionate impacts of climate change which they face. The central challenge is to enable all countries to strengthen delivery of their own development visions and goals through low-carbon, climate-resilient, or 'climate

411

China-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

China-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support China-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Jump to: navigation, search Name China-Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Agency/Company /Organization ClimateWorks, Project Catalyst, McKinsey and Company Sector Energy, Land Topics Background analysis, Low emission development planning, Policies/deployment programs Country China Eastern Asia References LCGP support[1] Low Carbon Growth Plans Advancing Good Practice, August 2009[2] Overview "Achieving development goals depends on enabling poorer countries to accelerate or maintain robust economic growth despite the disproportionate impacts of climate change which they face. The central challenge is to enable all countries to strengthen delivery of their own development visions and goals through low-carbon, climate-resilient, or 'climate

412

Work plan addendum for the remedial investigation and feasibility study of the Salmon Site  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is intended as an addendum to the Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS) Work Plan for the Salmon Site (SS) (formerly the Tatum Dome Test Site) Lamar County, Mississippi. The original work plan - Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study of the Tatum Dome Test Site, Lamar County, Mississippi (herein after called the Work Plan) was approved by the state of Mississippi in 1992 and was intended as the operative document for investigative activities at the Tatum Dome Test Site. Subsequent to the approval of the document a series of activities were undertaken under the auspices of the work plan. This document is organized in the same manner as the original work plan: (1) Introduction; (2) Site Background and History; (3) Initial Evaluation; (4) Data Quality Objectives; (5) RI/FS Tasks; (6) Project Schedule; (7) Project Management; and (8) Reference. This addendum will identify changes to the original work plan that are necessary because of additional information acquired at the SS. This document is not intended to replace the work plan, rather, it is intended to focus the remaining work in the context of additional site knowledge gained since the development of the original work plan. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is conducting a focused and phased site characterization as a part, of the RI/FS. The RI/FS is the methodology under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) for evaluating hazardous waste sites on the National Priorities List (NPL). The SS is not listed on the NPL, but DOE has voluntarily elected to conduct the evaluation of the SS in accordance with CERCLA.

NONE

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

413

Proposed Outline for DOE-LM / NRC Working Group Meeting  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Agenda Agenda Monticello Mill Tailings Site (MMTS) Operable Unit III Biomonitoring Scope and Status Future Scope of Groundwater Treatment June 27, 2011 (8 a.m. - 1 p.m.) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, Denver, CO 8:00 a.m. Introduction Objectives and Expected Outcomes: 1. Concur Upon Future Scope of Biomonitoring Program 2. Concur Upon Satisfied OU III Technical Impracticability (TI) Requirements and Identify Data Needs Biomonitoring Scope & Status 8:15 a.m. MMTS Biomonitoring: March 2011 Report Summary and Presentation* 8:45 a.m. Group Discussion Objectives: Review findings: Ensure common understanding of historical & ecological context

414

Lessons Learned in Optimizing Workers' and Worker Representatives' Input to Work Planning and Control  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Slide Presentation by Tom McQuiston, Dr. P.H., United Steelworkers - Tony Mazzocchi Center for Health, Safety and Environmental Education. Lessons Learned in Optimizing Workers and Worker Representatives Input in Work Planning and Control.

415

Contractor Work Planning and Control Lessons Learned from DOE and International Projects  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Slide Presentation by Bob McQuinn; URS Global Management and Operations Services; Frank McCoy and Rick Runnels; URS - Professional Solutions. Contractor Work Planning and Control-URS Lessons Learned.

416

WPN 15-4: QUALITY WORK PLAN REQUIREMENT UPDATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Effective October 21, 2014: This guidance provides updates to WPN 14-4 issued December 2, 2013. This guidance supersedes 14-4 and describes requirements to support and verify quality work in the Department of Energys (DOE) Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP). It defines what constitutes a quality installation of weatherization measures, outlines how those measures are inspected and validated, and prescribes acceptable training and credentialing of workers.

417

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Seminar: Washington Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Washington Update Washington Update May 22, 2013 Timothy D. Unruh PhD, PE, CEM Program Director DOE FEMP 2 Agenda  FEMP Update New Mission Statement Presidential Performance Contracting Challenge Performance Based Contracting Improvements ENABLE FEMP Activities  Washington Update EO on Industrial Energy Efficiency including CHP White House Green Button Initiative Government Energy Conference  Questions 3 FEMP Update 4  Vision  A compelling vision of the future you are seeking to create  Federal energy management leads national energy management  Purpose  Why you are here  Foster energy leadership FEMP Vision, Purpose, Position 5 Mission FEMP works with key individuals to accomplish energy change within

418

Single-shell tank closure work plan. Revision A  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In January 1994, the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Conset Order (Tri-Party Agreement) was amended to reflect a revised strategy for remediation of radioactive waste in underground storage tanks. These amendments include milestones for closure of the single-shell tank (SST) operable units, to be initiated by March 2012 and completed by September 2024. This SST-CWP has been prepared to address the principal topical areas identified in Tri-Party Agreement Milestone M-45-06 (i.e., regulatory pathway, operable unit characterization, waste retrieval, technology development, and a strategy for achieving closure). Chapter 2.0 of this SST-CWP provides a brief description of the environmental setting, SST System, the origin and characteristics of SST waste, and ancillary equipment that will be remediated as part of SST operable unit closure. Appendix 2A provides a description of the hydrogeology of the Hanford Site, including information on the unsaturated sediments (vadose zone) beneath the 200 Areas Plateau. Chapter 3.0 provides a discussion of the laws and regulations applicable to closure of the SST farm operable units. Chapter 4.0 provides a summary description of the ongoing characterization activities that best align with the proposed regulatory pathway for closure. Chapter 5.0 describes aspects of the SST waste retrieval program, including retrieval strategy, technology, and sequence, potential tank leakage during retrieval, and considerations of deployment of subsurface barriers. Chapter 6.0 outlines a proposed strategy for closure. Chapter 7.0 provides a summary of the programs underway or planned to develop technologies to support closure. Ca. 325 refs.

NONE

1995-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

419

Controlling a group of microCHPs: planning and realization  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Plant (VPP). To act on an electricity trading market, this VPP has to specify a production plan, consumption, distribution, storage and load man- agement of electricity) has changed. Important aspects in this change are the increase of the availability of renewable energy sources, the development of distributed

Al Hanbali, Ahmad

420

Lessons Learned at the Nevada National Security Site Implementing the EFCOG Activity-level Work Planning and Control Guide  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Slide Presentation by Steele Coddington, Work Planning Manager, National Security Technologies, Nevada National Security Site. Lessons Learned Implementing Work Planning & Control. 6 Step Process for improving WP&C.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "group work plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment Work Plan Mud Pit Release Sites, Amchitka Island, Alaska  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Work Plan describes the approach that will be used to conduct human health and ecological risk assessments for Amchitka Island, Alaska, which was utilized as an underground nuclear test site between 1965 and 1971. During this period, the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (now the U.S. Department of Energy) conducted two nuclear tests (known as Long Shot and Milrow) and assisted the U.S. Department of Defense with a third test (known as Cannikin). Amchitka Island is approximately 42 miles long and located 1,340 miles west-southwest of Anchorage, Alaska, in the western end of the Aleutian Island archipelago in a group of islands known as the Rat Islands. Historically including deep drilling operations required large volumes of drilling mud, a considerable amount of which was left on the island in exposed mud pits after testing was completed. Therefore, there is a need for drilling mud pit remediation and risk assessment of historical mud pit releases. The scope of this work plan is to document the environmental objectives and the proposed technical site investigation strategies that will be utilized for the site characterization of the constituents in soil, surface water, and sediment at these former testing sites. Its goal is the collection of data in sufficient quantity and quality to determine current site conditions, support a risk assessment for the site surfaces, and evaluate what further remedial action is required to achieve permanent closure of these three sites that will protect both human health and the environment. Suspected compounds of potential ecological concern for investigative analysis at these sites include diesel-range organics, polyaromatic hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyls, volatile organic compounds, and chromium. The results of these characterizations and risk assessments will be used to evaluate corrective action alternatives to include no further action, the implementation of institutional controls, capping on site, or off-sit e disposal of contaminated waste. The results of this evaluation will be presented in a subsequent corrective action decision document.

DOE /NV

2001-03-12T23:59:59.000Z

422

State and Tribal Government Working Group Visits the Weldon Spring Site |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Weldon Spring Weldon Spring Site State and Tribal Government Working Group Visits the Weldon Spring Site June 1, 2011 - 3:18pm Addthis State and Tribal Government Working Group Visits the Weldon Spring Site State and Tribal Government Working Group Visits the Weldon Spring Site State and Tribal Government Working Group Visits the Weldon Spring Site State and Tribal Government Working Group Visits the Weldon Spring Site What does this project do? Goal 1. Protect human health and the environment On Wednesday, June 1, 2011, the Office of Legacy Management (LM) Weldon Spring, Missouri, Site hosted the State and Tribal Government Working Group (STGWG) for a half-day tour of the site to provide insight on the daily operations of an LM site. The event was part of the STGWG 2011 Spring

423

Statement by Secretary Moniz on IPCC's Working Group Report on Climate Change Mitigation  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz issued a statement on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Working Group report on climate change mitigation.

424

Page 91 (corrected) Table 4.3.1. Working Group on Data Management.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

/CAS WORKING GROUP ON RADIATION FLUXES E. Raschke Germany/GKSS N/A EX­OFFICIO MEMBERS R. Schiffer USA

425

High Temperature Membrane Working Group, Minutes of Meeting on September 14, 2006  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

These meeting minutes provide information about the High Temperature Membrane Working Group meeting on September 14, 2006 in San Francisco, Ca.

426

Blackout 2003: Electric System Working Group Technical Conference- Comments and Recommendations  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

December 16, 2003 Electric System Working Group Technical Conference, Philadelphia PA - Summary of comments and recommendations relating to the aftermath of the August 2003 blackout.

427

BILIWG Meeting: DOE Hydrogen Quality Working Group Update and Recent Progress (Presentation)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presented at the 2007 Bio-Derived Liquids to Hydrogen Distributed Reforming Working Group held November 6, 2007 in Laurel, Maryland.

428

Summary of activities in the Working Group on QCD Cascades of the HERA Monte Carlo workshop  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

We summarize the activities in working group 10 concerned with QCD cascades, and find that although much work still needs to be done, much progress was made during this workshop in understanding the merits and deficiencies of different programs.

Nick Brook; Leif Lonnblad

1999-08-16T23:59:59.000Z

429

Summary of activities in the Working Group on QCD Cascades of the HERA Monte Carlo workshop  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

We summarize the activities in working group 10 concerned with QCD cascades, and find that although much work still needs to be done, much progress was made during this workshop in understanding the merits and deficiencies of different programs.

Brook, N; Brook, Nick; Lonnblad, Leif

1999-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

430

Final work plan : investigation of potential contamination at the former USDA facility in Powhattan, Kansas.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Work Plan outlines the scope of work to be conducted to investigate the subsurface contaminant conditions at the property formerly leased by the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) in Powhattan, Kansas (Figure 1.1). Data obtained during this event will be used to (1) evaluate potential contaminant source areas on the property; (2) determine the vertical and horizontal extent of potential contamination; and (3) provide recommendations for future action, with the ultimate goal of assigning this site No Further Action status. The planned investigation includes groundwater monitoring requested by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE), in accordance with Section V of the Intergovernmental Agreement between the KDHE and the Farm Service Agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The work is being performed on behalf of the CCC/USDA by the Environmental Science Division of Argonne National Laboratory. A nonprofit, multidisciplinary research center operated by the University of Chicago for the U.S. Department of Energy, Argonne provides technical assistance to the CCC/USDA with environmental site characterization and remediation at former CCC/USDA grain storage facilities. Argonne issued a Master Work Plan (Argonne 2002) that has been approved by the KDHE. The Master Work Plan describes the general scope of all investigations at former CCC/USDA facilities in Kansas and provides guidance for these investigations. It should be consulted for the complete details of plans for work associated with the former CCC/USDA facility at Powhattan.

LaFreniere, L. M.; Environmental Science Division

2007-02-02T23:59:59.000Z

431

CSMRI Flood Plain Characterization Work Plan Page 1 November 21, 2006  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, which was not addressed in the original Site work plan. The scope of work includes vegetation removal Agency in 1997 as part of an Emergency Removal Action under CERCLA. In the vicinity of the site, the 100 if the area qualifies for wetland status and would therefore need additional controls, possibly including a U

432

U.S.-Vietnam Climate Change Working Group | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Vietnam Climate Change Working Group Vietnam Climate Change Working Group Jump to: navigation, search Name U.S.-Vietnam Climate Change Working Group Agency/Company /Organization United States Geological Survey, Government of Vietnam Sector Energy, Land Topics Policies/deployment programs, Background analysis Website http://www.pwrc.usgs.gov/CCWG/ Program Start 2008 Country United States, Vietnam UN Region South-Eastern Asia, Northern America References U.S.-Vietnam Climate Change Working Group[1] "The U.S.-Vietnam Climate Change Working Group (CCWG) met in Hanoi from 31 March to 2 April 2010 and developed a program of cooperative work and projects. Priorities for cooperation included: I. To establish benchmark Surface Elevation Table (SET) devices on the Vietnam coast to measure coastal elevation change, the first step in

433

Ethiopia-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

form form View source History View New Pages Recent Changes All Special Pages Semantic Search/Querying Get Involved Help Apps Datasets Community Login | Sign Up Search Page Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon » Ethiopia-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Jump to: navigation, search Name Ethiopia-Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Agency/Company /Organization ClimateWorks, Project Catalyst, McKinsey and Company Sector Energy, Land Topics Background analysis, Low emission development planning, Policies/deployment programs Country Ethiopia Eastern Africa References LCGP support[1] Low Carbon Growth Plans Advancing Good Practice, August 2009[2] Overview "Achieving development goals depends on enabling poorer countries to accelerate or maintain robust economic growth despite the disproportionate

434

Mexico-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

form form View source History View New Pages Recent Changes All Special Pages Semantic Search/Querying Get Involved Help Apps Datasets Community Login | Sign Up Search Page Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon » Mexico-ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Jump to: navigation, search Name Mexico-Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Agency/Company /Organization ClimateWorks, Project Catalyst, McKinsey and Company Sector Energy, Land Topics Background analysis, Low emission development planning, Policies/deployment programs Country Mexico Central America References LCGP support[1] Low Carbon Growth Plans Advancing Good Practice, August 2009[2] Overview "Achieving development goals depends on enabling poorer countries to accelerate or maintain robust economic growth despite the disproportionate

435

Library Web Standards Recommendations of the SCIS Web Standards Working Group  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Library Web Standards Recommendations of the SCIS Web Standards Working Group Prepared by L. Jacobs, J. Head, L. Steinke (1997 February 8) Revised by Web Page Working Group, a sub of the Library. Goals of Library Web Pages: To facilitate access to Library resources To supplement access

Seldin, Jonathan P.

436

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting Argonne National Laboratory DC Offices  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting Argonne National Laboratory DC Offices 955 REPORT Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting December 12, 2006 955 L'Enfant Plaza research community involved in systems analysis of hydrogen storage materials and processes for information

437

ClimateWorks Low Carbon Growth Planning Support | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Jump to: navigation, search Jump to: navigation, search Name Low Carbon Growth Planning Support Agency/Company /Organization ClimateWorks, Project Catalyst, McKinsey and Company Sector Energy, Land Topics Background analysis, Low emission development planning, Policies/deployment programs Country Brazil, China, Democratic Republic of Congo, Egypt, Ethiopia, Guyana, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Malaysia, Mexico, Papua New Guinea South America, Eastern Asia, Middle Africa, Northern Africa, Eastern Africa, South America, Southern Asia, South-Eastern Asia, Eastern Africa, South-Eastern Asia, Central America, Melanesia References LCGP support[1] Low Carbon Growth Plans Advancing Good Practice, August 2009[2] Overview "Achieving development goals depends on enabling poorer countries to

438

Work Plan  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

to the DOE regarding the following subjects: soil contamination from historic atmospheric nuclear testing, remediation of contaminated facilities used to support historic testing,...

439

Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group to Meet March 25, 2008 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Sector Control Systems Working Group to Meet March 25, 2008 Sector Control Systems Working Group to Meet March 25, 2008 Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group to Meet March 25, 2008 The Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group is a unique public-private partnership recently formed to help guide implementation of the priorities identified in the industry-led Roadmap to Secure Control Systems in the Energy Sector. The group seeks to provide a platform for pursuing innovative and practical activities that will improve the security of the control systems that manage our nation's energy infrastructure. The Group will meet March 25, 2008 in St. Louis Missouri to focus on four objectives: Help identify and implement practical, near-term activities that are high priority for the industry Promote the value to the industry of achieving the goals of the

440

Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group to Meet March 25, 2008 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group to Meet March 25, 2008 Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group to Meet March 25, 2008 Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group to Meet March 25, 2008 The Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group is a unique public-private partnership recently formed to help guide implementation of the priorities identified in the industry-led Roadmap to Secure Control Systems in the Energy Sector. The group seeks to provide a platform for pursuing innovative and practical activities that will improve the security of the control systems that manage our nation's energy infrastructure. The Group will meet March 25, 2008 in St. Louis Missouri to focus on four objectives: Help identify and implement practical, near-term activities that are high priority for the industry Promote the value to the industry of achieving the goals of the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "group work plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Building indicator groups based on species characteristics can improve conservation planning  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

is in identifying important areas for the conservation of biodiversity. As networks of areas encompassing biodiversity to select networks of areas for conservation? In the literature, reliable indicator groupsBuilding indicator groups based on species characteristics can improve conservation planning

Manne, Lisa

442

Joint Working Group-39, Manufacturing Technology Subworking Group-F, remote handling and automation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The terms of reference were reviewed and continue to encompass the scope of activities of the SUBWOG. No revisions to the terms of reference were proposed. The list of site contacts who should receive copies of SUBWOG correspondence and meeting minutes was reviewed and updated. Documents exchanged related to the meeting include: Minutes of the sixth SUBOG 39F meeting; transactions of the fifth topical meeting on robotics and remote handling; data on manipulators was forwarded to LLNL from the robotics group at AEA Harwell; and the specifications of the duct remediation robot from the Rocky Flats Plant.

Merrill, R.D.

1995-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

443

United States-Japan Nuclear Security Working Group Fact Sheet | National  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

United States-Japan Nuclear Security Working Group Fact Sheet | National United States-Japan Nuclear Security Working Group Fact Sheet | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > Media Room > Fact Sheets > United States-Japan Nuclear Security Working Group Fact Sheet Fact Sheet United States-Japan Nuclear Security Working Group Fact Sheet Mar 27, 2012

444

Interagency Advanced Power Group, Joint Electrical and Nuclear Working Group, meeting minutes, November 16--17, 1993  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Reports on soldier power R&D review, N-MCT power electronic building blocks, silicon carbide power semiconductor work, and ground based radar were made to the Power Conditioning Panel. An introduction to high temperature electronics needs, research and development was made to the High Temperature Electronics Subcommittee. The Pulse Power Panel received reports on the navy ETC gun, and army pulse power. The Superconductivity Panel received reports on high-tc superconducting wires, superconducting magnetic energy storage, and superconducting applications. The Nuclear Working Group received presentations on the Topaz nuclear power program, and space nuclear work in the Department of Energy.

Not Available

1993-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

445

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) Meeting Report for May 5-6, 2009  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting May 5-6, 2009 Biloxi, Mississippi Hosted by: Mississippi Power INTRODUCTION The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) is a joint effort between the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) and the utility industry to stimulate the exchange of information among participants and foster energy efficiency projects in Federal facilities nationwide. Over 140 individuals attended the meeting. Attendance Representation: * 40 utility officials * 40 Federal agency representatives * 6 National Laboratory representatives * 52 representatives from energy-related organizations (See Appendix 1 for full list of participants and organizations at the end of this report) MEETING PRESENTATIONS

446

Draft Level 1 Remedial Investigation Work Plan: 316-3 waste disposal trenches  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This work plan describes the work to be performed for the initial level of site characterization for the 316.3 Trenches at the Hanford Site. This initial site characterization effort will include a review of existing environmental contamination data for the 300 Area as well as collection and analysis of environmental samples to better characterize subsurface contamination at the site. 7 refs., 10 figs., 7 tabs.

Not Available

1987-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

447

University of Glasgow Carbon Management Programme Carbon Management Plan working with  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

carbon vision 11 2.3 Strategic themes 12 Targets and objectives 13 3 Emissions Baseline and Projections. Professor Anton Muscatelli, Principal Foreword from the Carbon Trust Cutting carbon emissions as partUniversity of Glasgow Carbon Management Programme Carbon Management Plan working with Page 1 Carbon

Mottram, Nigel

448

Working Group III: Threats Due to Climate Change Global Problems in A Regional Context  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The expertise of the participants in the Working Group primarily encompassed the area stretching from Eastern Europe through the Caucasus to the states of Central Asia. This region is the focus of this report....

P. Robinson

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

449

Security Working Group Marty Humphrey GRID FORUM DRAFT University of Virginia  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Security Working Group Marty Humphrey GRID FORUM DRAFT University of Virginia Mary Thompson] Security Implications of Typical Grid Computing Usage Scenarios security-implications-01 ways to access the immense computational power of a Computational Grid, each with unique security

Lee, Ruby B.

450

Exploring Chinese Graduate Students' Learner Identity in Group Work in Western Academia: Perceptions, Representations and Challenges  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Group work (GW) is commonly used in many countries around the world. The emerging predominance of GW assignments represents a major trend in higher education (Burdett & Hastie, 2009) as employers highly value teamwork skills and seek the development...

Gao, Junfu

2014-05-31T23:59:59.000Z

451

Bio-Derived Liquids to Hydrogen Distributed Reforming Working Group Background Paper  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Paper by Arlene Anderson and Tracy Carole presented at the Bio-Derived Liquids to Hydrogen Distributed Reforming Working Group, with a focus on key drivers, purpose, and scope.

452

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) Meeting Report for November 19-20, 2008  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting November 19-20, 2008 Williamsburg, Virginia Hosted by: Virginia Natural Gas in Partnership with Energy Systems Group INTRODUCTION The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) is a joint effort between the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) and the utility industry to stimulate the exchange of information among participants and foster energy efficiency projects in Federal facilities nationwide. The Fall 2008 FUPWG meeting took place in Williamsburg, Virginia from November 19-20 th . Virginia Natural Gas, an AGL Resources Company, hosted the meeting in partnership with Energy Systems Group. 159 individuals attended the meeting, 83 of which were either attending their first FUPWG meeting, or had not attended within the past four years.

453

The EM SSAB Annual Work Plan Process: Focusing Board Efforts and Resources - 13667  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

One of the most daunting tasks for any new member of a local board of the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB) is to try to understand the scope of the clean-up activities going on at the site. In most cases, there are at least two or three major cleanup activities in progress as well as monitoring of past projects. When planning for future projects is added to the mix, the list of projects can be long. With the clean-up activities involving all major environmental media - air, water, soils, and groundwater, new EM SSAB members can find themselves totally overwhelmed and ineffective. Helping new members get over this initial hurdle is a major objective of EM and all local boards of the EM SSAB. Even as members start to understand the size and scope of the projects at a site, they can still be frustrated at the length of time it takes to see results and get projects completed. Many project and clean-up timelines for most of the sites go beyond 10 years, so it's not unusual for an EM SSAB member to see the completion of only 1 or 2 projects over the course of their 6-year term on the board. This paper explores the annual work planning process of the EM SSAB local boards, one tool that can be used to educate EM SSAB members into seeing the broader picture for the site. EM SSAB local work plans divide the site into projects focused on a specific environmental issue or media such as groundwater and/or waste disposal options. Projects are further broken down into smaller segments by highlighting major milestones. Using these metrics, local boards of the EM SSAB can start to quantify the effectiveness of the project in achieving the ultimate goal of site clean-up. These metrics can also trigger board advice and recommendations for EM. At the beginning of each fiscal year, the EM SSAB work plan provides a road map with quantifiable checkpoints for activities throughout the year. When the work plans are integrated with site-specific, enforceable regulatory milestones, they can provide a comprehensive work plan for not only the board, but also regulators, site contractors, and DOE. Because the work plans are reviewed and approved by DOE, they carry some weight in holding local boards of the EM SSAB accountable. This structure provides the basis for local boards to achieve their primary function, to provide DOE with information, advice, and recommendations concerning issues affecting the EM program at the site. (authors)

Young, Ralph [Paducah Citizens Advisory Board (United States)] [Paducah Citizens Advisory Board (United States)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

454

Improvement of modelling capabilities for assessing urban contamination : The EMRAS Urban Remediation Working Group.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Urban Remediation Working Group of the International Atomic Energy Agency's Environmental Modeling for Radiation Safety (EMRAS) programme was established to improve modeling and assessment capabilities for radioactively contaminated urban situations, including the effects of countermeasures. An example of the Working Group's activities is an exercise based on Chernobyl fallout data in Ukraine, which has provided an opportunity to compare predictions among several models and with available measurements, to discuss reasons for discrepancies, and to identify areas where additional information would be helpful.

Thiessen, K. M.; Batandjieva, B.; Andersson, K. G.; Arkhipov, A.; Charnock, T. W.; Gallay, F.; Gaschak, S.; Golikov, V.; Hwang, W. T.; Kaiser, J. C.; Kamboj, S.; Steiner, M.; Tomas, J.; Trifunovic, D.; Yu, C.; Ziemer, R. L.; Zlobenko, B.; Environmental Science Division; SENES Oak Ridge; IAEA; Riso National Lab.; Chernobyl Center for Nuclear Safety; Health Protection Agency; IRSN; Inst. of Radiation Hygene of the Ministry of Public Health, Russian Federation; KAERI, Republic of Korea; GSF, Germany; BfS, Germany; CPHR, Cuba; State Office for Radiation Protection, Croatia; AECL, Canada; National Academy of Science, Ukraine

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

455

Working alliance in individual and group cognitive therapy for social anxiety disorder  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract The tripartite model of working alliance, including the therapeutic bond and agreement on tasks and goals, was examined in 54 patients who received individual or group cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for social anxiety disorder (SAD) in a randomized trial. Alliance was significantly stronger in individual relative to group CBT but generally not related to outcome.

Ewa Mrtberg

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

456

Industrial Sites Work Plan for Leachfield Corrective Action Units: Nevada Test Site and Tonopah Test Range, Nevada (including Record of Technical Change Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Leachfield Corrective Action Units (CAUs) Work Plan has been developed in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) that was agreed to by the U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office (DOE/NV); the State of Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP); and the U.S. Department of Defense (FFACO, 1996). Under the FFACO, a work plan is an optional planning document that provides information for a CAU or group of CAUs where significant commonality exists. A work plan may be developed that can be referenced by leachfield Corrective Action Investigation Plans (CAIPs) to eliminate redundant CAU documentation. This Work Plan includes FFACO-required management, technical, quality assurance (QA), health and safety, public involvement, field sampling, and waste management documentation common to several CAUs with similar site histories and characteristics, namely the leachfield systems at the Nevada Test Site (NTS) and the Tonopah Test Range (TT R). For each CAU, a CAIP will be prepared to present detailed, site-specific information regarding contaminants of potential concern (COPCs), sampling locations, and investigation methods.

DOE/NV

1998-12-18T23:59:59.000Z

457

SAFETY COMMITTEE ANNUAL PLAN TEMPLATE The safety committee and the unit administration work together in promoting the unit's safety and  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

SAFETY COMMITTEE ANNUAL PLAN TEMPLATE The safety committee and the unit administration work together in promoting the unit's safety and health efforts. The Safety Committee Annual Plan provides. Supervisors can review the plan with new employees during their safety orientation. 3. Safety committee

Collins, Gary S.

458

Working Group Presentations | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Working Group Working Group Presentations Nuclear Physics (NP) NP Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of NP Funding Opportunities Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) News & Resources Contact Information Nuclear Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-26/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3613 F: (301) 903-3833 E: sc.np@science.doe.gov More Information » Workshop on The Nation's Needs for Isotopes: Present and Future Working Group Presentations Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Group 1 - Stable and Enriched Isotopes Enriched Stable Isotopes and Technical Services at ORNL .pdf file (2.0MB) - Scott Aaron 5-Year Sales Analysis of ORNL Stable Isotopes Inventory Depletion .xls file (19KB) Table for Report .pdf file (41KB)

459

Executive function processes: inhibition, working memory, planning and attention in children and youth with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This study examines the roles of inhibition, attention, working memory, and planning in youth with and without ADHD. As conceptualized in theories of attention, inhibition, and working memory, difficulties with these executive processes interact...

Wolfe, Monica Eileen

2006-04-12T23:59:59.000Z

460

Fiscal year 1990 Rocky Flats Plant Environmental Restoration program Current-Year Work Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Rocky Flats Plant (RFP) is a nuclear weapons manufacturing facility currently operated by EG G for the US Department of Energy (DOE). RFP is located at the foot of the Rocky Mountains in Jefferson Country, Colorado. The Fiscal Year 1990 (FY90) Current-Year Work Plan (CYWP) is intended to serve as a guidance document for the Environmental Restoration (ER) and RCRA Compliance programs that will be implemented at RFP. The CYWP provides in one document any cross-references necessary to understand the interrelationships between the CYWP and the DOE Five-Year Plan (FYP), Site-Specific Plan (SSP), and other related documents. The scope of this plan includes comparison of planned FY90 ER activities to those actually achieved. The CYWP has been updated to include Colorado Department of Health (CDH), US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and DOE Inter-Agency Agreement ER activities. It addresses hazardous wastes, radioactive wastes, mixed wastes (radioactive and hazardous), and sanitary wastes. The CYWP also addresses facilities and sites contaminated with or used in management of those wastes.

Nielsen, T. (EG and G Rocky Flats, Inc., Golden, CO (USA)); Waage, E.; Miller, D. (Stoller (S.M.) Corp., Boulder, CO (USA))

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "group work plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

WIPP Facility Work Plan for Solid Waste Management Units and Areas of Concern  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This 2002 Facility Work Plan (FWP) has been prepared as required by Module VII, Permit Condition VII.U.3 of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Hazardous Waste Facility Permit, NM4890139088-TSDF (the Permit) (New Mexico Environment Department [NMED], 1999a), and incorporates comments from the NMED received on December 6, 2000 (NMED, 2000a). This February 2002 FWP describes the programmatic facility-wide approach to future investigations at Solid Waste Management Units (SWMU) and Areas of Concern (AOC) specified in the Permit. The Permittees are evaluating data from previous investigations of the SWMUs and AOCs against the most recent guidance proposed by the NMED. Based on these data, and completion of the August 2001 sampling requested by the NMED, the Permittees expect that no further sampling will be required and that a request for No Further Action (NFA) at the SWMUs and AOCs will be submitted to the NMED. This FWP addresses the current Permit requirements. It uses the results of previous investigations performed at WIPP and expands the investigations as required by the Permit. As an alternative to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Facility Investigation (RFI) specified in Module VII of the Permit, current NMED guidance identifies an Accelerated Corrective Action Approach (ACAA) that may be used for any SWMU or AOC (NMED, 1998). This accelerated approach is used to replace the standard RFI Work Plan and Report sequence with a more flexible decision-making approach. The ACAA process allows a facility to exit the schedule of compliance contained in the facility's Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) permit module and proceed on an accelerated time frame. Thus, the ACAA processcan be entered either before or after an RFI Work Plan. According to the NMED's guidance, a facility can prepare an RFI Work Plan or Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) for any SWMU or AOC (NMED, 1998). Based on this guidance, a SAP constitutes an acceptable alternative to the RFI Work Plan specified in the Permit. The NMED accepted that the Permittees are using the ACAA in a letter dated April 20, 2000.

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2002-03-05T23:59:59.000Z

462

WIPP Facility Work Plan for Solid Waste Management Units and Areas of Concern  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

his 2002 Facility Work Plan (FWP) has been prepared as required by Module VII,Permit Condition VII.U.3 of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Hazardous Waste Facility Permit, NM4890139088-TSDF (the Permit) (New Mexico Environment Department [NMED], 1999a), and incorporates comments from the NMED received onDecember 6, 2000 (NMED, 2000a). This February 2002 FWP describes the program-matic facility-wide approach to future investigations at Solid Waste Management Units (SWMU) and Areas of Concern (AOC) specified in the Permit. The Permittees are evaluating data from previous investigations of the SWMUs and AOCs against the mostrecent guidance proposed by the NMED. Based on these data, and completion of the August 2001 sampling requested by the NMED, the Permittees expect that no further sampling will be required and that a request for No Further Action (NFA) at the SWMUs and AOCs will be submitted to the NMED. This FWP addresses the current Permit requirements. It uses the results of previous investigations performed at WIPP and expands the investigations as required by the Permit. As an alternative to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)Facility Investigation (RFI) specified in Module VII of the Permit, current NMED guidance identifies an Accelerated Corrective Action Approach (ACAA) that may beused for any SWMU or AOC (NMED, 1998). This accelerated approach is used toreplace the standard RFI Work Plan and Report sequence with a more flexible decision-making approach. The ACAA process allows a facility to exit the schedule of compliance contained in the facility's Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) permit module and proceed on an accelerated time frame. Thus, the ACAA process can be entered either before or after an RFI Work Plan. According to the NMED's guidance, a facility can prepare an RFI Work Plan or Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) for any SWMU or AOC (NMED, 1998). Based on this guidance, a SAP constitutes an acceptable alternative to the RFI Work Plan specified in the Permit. The NMED accepted that the Permittees are using the ACAA in a letter dated April 20, 2000.

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2002-03-05T23:59:59.000Z

463

MULTI-TARGET ASSIGNMENT AND PATH PLANNING FOR GROUPS OF UAVS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Chapter 1 MULTI-TARGET ASSIGNMENT AND PATH PLANNING FOR GROUPS OF UAVS Theju Maddula Ali A. Minai of Cincinnati Cincinnati, OH 45221 Abstract Uninhabited autonomous vehicles (UAVs) have many useful military in the possibility of using large teams (swarms) of UAVs functioning cooperatively to accomplish a large number

Minai, Ali A.

464

Review of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Work Planning and Control Activities, April 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Oversight Review of the Independent Oversight Review of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Work Planning and Control Activities April 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Scope.................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background........................................................................................................................................... 1 4.0 Methodology......................................................................................................................................... 2

465

Final report of the accident phenomenology and consequence (APAC) methodology evaluation. Spills Working Group  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Spills Working Group was one of six working groups established under the Accident Phenomenology and Consequence (APAC) methodology evaluation program. The objectives of APAC were to assess methodologies available in the accident phenomenology and consequence analysis area and to evaluate their adequacy for use in preparing DOE facility safety basis documentation, such as Basis for Interim Operation (BIO), Justification for Continued Operation (JCO), Hazard Analysis Documents, and Safety Analysis Reports (SARs). Additional objectives of APAC were to identify development needs and to define standard practices to be followed in the analyses supporting facility safety basis documentation. The Spills Working Group focused on methodologies for estimating four types of spill source terms: liquid chemical spills and evaporation, pressurized liquid/gas releases, solid spills and resuspension/sublimation, and resuspension of particulate matter from liquid spills.

Brereton, S.; Shinn, J. [Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (United States); Hesse, D [Battelle Columbus Labs., OH (United States); Kaninich, D. [Westinghouse Savannah River Co., Aiken, SC (United States); Lazaro, M. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States); Mubayi, V. [Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States)

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

466

July 17, 2008; HSS/Union Working Group Meeting, Safety Standards, 10 CFR 851 - Agenda  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4-08 Draft 4-08 Draft HSS/Union Working Group Meeting July 17, 2008 1:00 - 4:00 pm EST FORS 7E-069 Call-in: 301-903-9197 SUBJECT: SAFETY STANDARDS / 10 CFR 851 Core Union Working Groups Safety Standards: Metal Trades Department AFL-CIO - Lead International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Association (OPCMIA) 10 CFR 851: United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union (USW) - Lead Building &Construction Trades Department Center for Construction Research &Training (BCTD CPWR) International Guards Union of America (IGUA) International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE)

467

April 30, 2008; HSS/Union Working Group Meeting to address training - Information Package, Part I  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Training April 30, 2008 Training April 30, 2008 This page intentionally blank. HSS/Union Working Group Meeting April 30, 2008 1:00 - 3:00 pm EST FORS 7E-069 CALL-IN NUMBER: 301-903-6495 SUBJECT: TRAINING Union Working Group Sheet Metal Workers International Association (SMWIA) - Lead Metal Trades Department AFL-CIO Building and Construction Trades Department Center for Construction Research & Training (BCTD CPWR) Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Association (OPCMIA) International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) International Guards Union of America (IGUA) International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE) United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union (USW)

468

April 30, 2008; HSS/Union Working Group Meeting, Training - Agenda  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

-28-08 Draft -28-08 Draft HSS/Union Working Group Meeting April 30, 2008 1:00 - 3:00 pm EST FORS 7E-069 Call-in: 301-903-6495 SUBJECT: TRAINING Union Working Group Sheet Metal Workers International Association (SMWIA) - Lead Metal Trades Department AFL-CIO Building and Construction Trades Department Center for Construction Research & Training (BCTD CPWR) Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Association (OPCMIA) International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) International Guards Union of America (IGUA) International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE) United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union (USW)

469

Bio-Derived Liquids to Hydrogen Distributed Reforming Working Group Kick-Off Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. Department of Energy held a kick-off meeting for the Bio-Derived Liquids to Hydrogen Distributed Reforming Working Group (BILIWG) on October 24, 2006, in Baltimore, Maryland. The Working Group is addressing technical challenges to distributed reforming of biomass-derived, renewable liquid fuels to hydrogen, including the reforming, water-gas shift, and hydrogen recovery and purification steps. The meeting provided the opportunity for researchers to share their experiences in converting bio-derived liquids to hydrogen with each other and with members of the DOE Hydrogen Production Technical Team.

470

REPORT OF THE SNOWMASS M6 WORKING GROUP ON HIGH INTENSITY PROTON SOURCES.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The M6 working group had more than 40 active participants (listed in Section 4). During the three weeks at Snowmass, there were about 50 presentations, covering a wide range of topics associated with high intensity proton sources. The talks are listed in Section 5. This group also had joint sessions with a number of other working groups, including E1 (Neutrino Factories and Muon Colliders), E5 (Fixed-Target Experiments), M1 (Muon Based Systems), T4 (Particle Sources), T5 (Beam dynamics), T7 (High Performance Computing) and T9 (Diagnostics). The M6 group performed a survey of the beam parameters of existing and proposed high intensity proton sources, in particular, of the proton drivers. The results are listed in Table 1. These parameters are compared with the requirements of high-energy physics users of secondary beams in Working Groups E1 and E5. According to the consensus reached in the E1 and E5 groups, the U.S. HEP program requires an intense proton source, a 1-4 MW Proton Driver, by the end of this decade.

CHOU,W.; WEI,J.

2001-08-14T23:59:59.000Z

471

Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan for Operable Units 6-05 and 10-04, Phase III  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The remedial design/remedial action for Operable Unit 6-05 (Waste Area Group 6) and Operable Unit 10-04 (Waste Area Group 10) - collectively called Operable Unit 10-04 has been divided into four phases. Phase I consists of developing and implementing institutional controls at Operable Unit 10-04 sites and developing and implementing Idaho National Laboratory-wide plans for both institutional controls and ecological monitoring. Phase II will remediate sites contaminated with trinitrotoluene and Royal Demolition Explosive. Phase III will remediate lead contamination at a gun range, and Phase IV will remediate hazards from unexploded ordnance. This Phase III remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan addresses the remediation of lead-contaminated soils found at the Security Training Facility (STF)-02 Gun Range located at the Idaho National Laboratory. Remediation of the STF-02 Gun Range will include excavating contaminated soils; physically separating copper and lead for recycling; returning separated soils below the remediation goal to the site; stabilizing contaminated soils, as required, and disposing of the separated soils that exceed the remediation goal; encapsulating and disposing of creosote-contaminated railroad ties and power poles; removing and disposing of the wooden building and asphalt pads found at the STF-02 Gun Range; sampling and analyzing soil to determine the excavation requirements; and when the remediation goals have been met, backfilling and contouring excavated areas and revegetating the affected area.

R. P. Wells

2006-09-19T23:59:59.000Z

472

Phase 1 RCRA Facility Investigation & Corrective Measures Study Work Plan for Single Shell Tank (SST) Waste Management Areas  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is the master work plan for the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) Corrective Action Program (RCAP) for single-shell tank (SST) farms at the US. Department of Energy's (DOE'S) Hanford Site. The DOE Office of River Protection (ORP) initiated the RCAP to address the impacts of past and potential future tank waste releases to the environment. This work plan defines RCAP activities for the four SST waste management areas (WMAs) at which releases have contaminated groundwater. Recognizing the potential need for future RCAP activities beyond those specified in this master work plan, DOE has designated the currently planned activities as ''Phase 1.'' If a second phase of activities is needed for the WMAs addressed in Phase 1, or if releases are detected at other SST WMAs, this master work plan will be updated accordingly.

MCCARTHY, M.M.

1999-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

473

OUTLINE FOR THE IPCC WORKING GROUP II CONTRIBUTION TO THE FOURTH ASSESSMENT REPORT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. Assessment of Observed Changes and Responses in Natural and Managed Systems · Methods in detectionOUTLINE FOR THE IPCC WORKING GROUP II CONTRIBUTION TO THE FOURTH ASSESSMENT REPORT CLIMATE CHANGE · Scope of this Assessment · Relation to other reports and studies A. ASSESSMENT OF OBSERVED CHANGES 1

Fischlin, Andreas

474

Minutes from Durability Working Group (DWG) Kick-off Meeting Contaminants  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

was to bring it up at the 6/29/10 DOE-HQ Fuel Cell Team meeting.) Sharing of information from industrial for incorporation into DTI and Tiax cost analyses. First working group teleconference to be between modelers in conjunction with either the Fuel Cell Seminar or the Electrochemical Society Meeting. A vote was taken

475

Earth Science Data Systems Software Reuse Working Group 2009 Year-end Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Sciences / NASA GSFC, 301-867-2186, albert.j.fleig@nasa.gov Contributing Members: Corey Bettenhausen, Bruce Most, Shahin Samadi, Mark Sherman, Bruce Vollmer, Christine Whalen, Bruce Wilson, Robert Wolfe. 2009 to our interactions with other working groups through joint meetings. Throughout the year, we have held

476

IAU GENERAL ASSEMBLY: RIO 2009 REPORT OF THE IAU WORKING GROUP ON HISTORIC RADIO  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

held on Wednesday 5 August, during Session 2. Four papers (by John Dickel, Bruce McAdam, Harry Wendt. PREAMBLE During the Rio General Assembly we held the following meetings of the Working Group: a Business", and a Science Meeting on "Recent Research". 2. BUSINESS MEETING This meeting was held on Tuesday 4 August

Groppi, Christopher

477

Response to the Phase Two Report of the Working Group on Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Response to the Phase Two Report of the Working Group on Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment Joint Task Force on Accountability University of Massachusetts Amherst October 14, 2011 The Phase Two be constructed that is faithful to the demands of both perspectives? This question has national relevance

Massachusetts at Amherst, University of

478

PALeo-constraints on SEA-level rise (PALSEA) -a PAGES/IMAGES working group  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

PALeo-constraints on SEA-level rise (PALSEA) - a PAGES/IMAGES working group Coordinators: Mark for the reduction in ice sheets and subsequent rise in sea level over the next century are highly uncertain rise. Interglacial sea levels constrain the global sensitivity of sea-level to radiative forcing. Well

Siddall, Mark

479

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting 2007 Hydrogen Program Annual Review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting 2007 Hydrogen Program Annual Review Crystal Laboratory and Elvin Yuzugullu Sentech, Inc. June 28, 2007 #12;SUMMARY REPORT Hydrogen Storage of hydrogen storage materials and processes for information exchange and to update the researchers on related

480

Energy Secretary Moniz Announces Formation of Nuclear Energy Tribal Working Group  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

WASHINGTONBuilding on President Obamas commitment to strengthen the government-to-government relationship with Tribal Nations, Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz today announced the formalization of the Nuclear Energy Tribal Working Group (NETWG), providing a forum for Tribal Leaders to engage with the Department on a wide scope of nuclear energy issues.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "group work plan" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Service station requirements for safe use of hydrogen based fuels: NHA work group update  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper consists of viewgraphs which summarize the results of the meeting of the working group on safety standards. A standard for an odorant for hydrogen leak detection is set forth. Recent activities with the National Fire Protection Association and the International Standard Organization are enumerated. The path forward is also summarized.

Coutts, D.A. [Westinghouse Savannah River Co., Aiken, SC (United States)

1997-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

482

An Invitation to Join the Food Safety Preventive Controls Alliance Working Group  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

An Invitation to Join the Food Safety Preventive Controls Alliance Working Group The Food Safety Preventive Controls Alliance (FSPCA) is a broad-based public-private alliance established in late 2011 for Food Safety and Health (IIT IFSH). The mission of the Alliance is to support safe food production

Saniie, Jafar

483

Euro Working Group on Transportation 2014 Estimating Travel Time Distribution under different Traffic  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Euro Working Group on Transportation 2014 Estimating Travel Time Distribution under different result in an increase in travel time variability and in a decrease in reliability. Reliability becomes of the distribution of travel time is needed to properly estimate these values. Congestion distorts the distribution

Boyer, Edmond

484

RCRA and operational monitoring (ROM): Multi-year program plan and fiscal year 96 work plan. WBS 1.5.3, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The RCRA & Operational Monitoring (ROM) Program Office manages the Hanford Site direct funded Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and Operational Monitoring under Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) 1.01.05.03. The ROM Program Office is included in Hanford Technical Services, a part of Projects & Site Services of Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC). The 1996 Multi-Year Program Plan (MYPP) includes the Fiscal Year Work Plan (FYWP). The Multi-Year Program Plan takes its direction from the Westinghouse Planning Baseline Integration Organization. The MYPP provides both the near term, enhanced details and the long term, projected details for the Program Office to use as baseline Cost, Scope and Schedule. Change Control administered during the fiscal year is against the baseline provided by near term details of this document. The MYPP process has been developed by WHC to meet its internal planning and integration needs and complies with the requirements of the US Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office (RL) Long Range Planning Process Directive (RLID 5000.2). Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC) has developed the multi-year planning process for programs to establish the technical, schedule and cost baselines for program and support activities under WHC`s scope of responsibility. The baseline information is developed by both WHC indirect funded support services organization, and direct funded programs in WHC. WHC Planning and Integration utilizes the information presented in the program specific MYPP and the Program Master Baseline Schedule (PMBS) to develop the Site-Wide Integrated Schedule.

NONE

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

485

RCRA facility investigation/corrective measures study work plan for the 200-UP-2 Operable Unit, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The 200-UP-2 Operable Unit is one of two source operable units at the U Plant Aggregate Area at the Hanford Site. Source operable units include waste management units and unplanned release sites that are potential sources of radioactive and/or hazardous substance contamination. This work plan, while maintaining the title RFI/CMS, presents the background and direction for conducting a limited field investigation in the 200-UP-2 Operable Unit, which is the first part of the process leading to final remedy selection. This report discusses the background, prior recommendations, goals, organization, and quality assurance for the 200-UP-2 Operable Unit Work Plan. The discussion begins with a summary of the regulatory framework and the role of the work plan. The specific recommendations leading into the work plan are then addressed. Next, the goals and organization of the report are discussed. Finally, the quality assurance and supporting documentation are presented.

Not Available

1993-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

486

Report on the 1ST Meeting of the Joint Working Group on  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

FINAL FINAL Report on the 2 nd Meeting of the Joint Working Group on Safety for the U.S.-PRC Coordinating Committee of Fusion Energy (U.S.-PRC Safety Monitoring Program) Meeting in USA, November 4-17, 2010 A. PURPOSE The purpose of the 2nd meeting of the U.S.-China Joint Working Group on Safety was to informally evaluate the programmatic aspects of environmental, health and safety (ESH) programs in US fusion research facilities by touring laboratory areas and meeting with researchers and safety professionals. Based on these interactions, the U.S.-China delegation was able to share information and provide suggestions in an effort to reduce the likelihood of bodily injury and/or property damage. In addition, good approaches and practices developed at

487

July 17, 2008; HSS/Union Working Group Meeting, Safety Standards, 10 CFR 851 - Information Package  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

10 CFR 851 / Safety Standards 10 CFR 851 / Safety Standards July 17, 2008 July 17, 2008 ds 06-24-08 Draft HSS/Union Working Group Meeting July 17, 2008 1:00 - 4:00 pm EST FORS 7E-069 Call-in: 301-903-9197 SUBJECT: SAFETY STANDARDS / 10 CFR 851 Core Union Working Groups Safety Standards: Metal Trades Department AFL-CIO - Lead International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Association (OPCMIA) 10 CFR 851: United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union (USW) - Lead Building &Construction Trades Department Center for Construction Research &Training (BCTD CPWR) International Guards Union of America (IGUA) International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE)

488

Les Houches 2013: Physics at TeV Colliders: New Physics Working Group Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

We present the activities of the "New Physics" working group for the "Physics at TeV Colliders" workshop (Les Houches, France, 3--21 June, 2013). Our report includes new computational tool developments, studies of the implications of the Higgs boson discovery on new physics, important signatures for searches for natural new physics at the LHC, new studies of flavour aspects of new physics, and assessments of the interplay between direct dark matter searches and the LHC.

Brooijmans, G; Fuks, B; Moortgat, F; Richardson, P; Sekmen, S; Weiler, A; Alloul, A; Arbey, A; Baglio, J; Barducci, D; Barr, A J; Basso, L; Battaglia, M; Blanger, G; Belyaev, A; Bernon, J; Bharucha, A; Bondu, O; Boudjema, F; Boos, E; Buchkremer, M; Bunichev, V; Cacciapaglia, G; Chalons, G; Conte, E; Dolan, M J; Deandrea, A; De Causmaecker, K; Djouadi, A; Dumont, B; Ellis, J; Englert, C; Falkowski, A; Fichet, S; Flacke, T; Gaz, A; Ghezzi, M; Godbole, R; Goudelis, A; Gouzevitch, M; Greco, D; Grober, R; Grojean, C; Guadagnoli, D; Gunion, J F; Herrmann, B; Kalinowski, J; Kim, J H; Kraml, S; Krauss, M E; Kulkarni, S; Lee, S J; Lim, S H; Liu, D; Mahmoudi, F; Maravin, Y; Massironi, A; Mitzka, L; Mohan, K; Moreau, G; Mhlleitner, M M; Nhung, D T; O'Leary, B; Oliveira, A; Panizzi, L; Pappadopulo, D; Pataraia, S; Porod, W; Pukhov, A; Riva, F; Rojo, J; Rosenfeld, R; Ruiz-lvarez, J; Rzehak, H; Sanz, V; Sengupta, D; Spannowsky, M; Spira, M; Streicher, J; Strobbe, N; Thamm, A; Thomas, M; Torre, R; Waltenberger, W; Walz, K; Wilcock, A; Wulzer, A; Wrthwein, F; Wymant, C

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

489

2014-06-09 Issuance: Regional Standards Enforcement Working Group; Notice of Intent  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This document is a pre-publication notice of intent to establish the regional standards enforcement working group, as issued by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency on June 9, 2014. Though it is not intended or expected, should any discrepancy occur between the document posted here and the document published in the Federal Register, the Federal Register publication controls. This document is being made available through he Internet solely as a means to facilitate the public's access to this document.

490

Working Group Meeting Presentation Guidance at a Glance Distributed Reforming of Biomass Pyrolysis Oils  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

(75%) Char (13%) Gas (12%) Catalytic Auto-thermal Reforming of Bio-Oil at 650oC: 0.71 CH1.98O0.76 + 0 Case (Ethanol Case) Bio-oil Storage Tank $106,040 Reformer $803,000 Shift Reactor, PSA, BOP $1 Oils DOE Bio-Derived Liquids to Hydrogen Distributed Reforming Working Group Meeting November 6

491

2014-07-08 Issuance: ASRAC Regional Enforcement Working Group; Notice of Membership  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This document is a pre-publication Federal Register notice of membership regarding the ASRAC Regional Enforcement Working Group, as issued by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency on July 8, 2014. Though it is not intended or expected, should any discrepancy occur between the document posted here and the document published in the Federal Register, the Federal Register publication controls. This document is being made available through the Internet solely as a means to facilitate the public's access to this document.

492

National Action Plan on Demand Response | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

National Action Plan on Demand Response National Action Plan on Demand Response Presentation-given at the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) Fall 2008...

493

Accomplishments and objectives of the PNC codes and standards working group  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper describes the activities of the Pacific Nuclear Council Codes and Standards Working Group during the past several years, and discuss its objectives. The Working Group has met regularly since 1985 to discuss ways to implement the following mission statement: [open quotes]To encourage the use of reasonably consistent criteria for the design, fabrication, construction, testing, operations and maintenance of hardware components, systems, subsystems and structures for the commercial nuclear power plants in the Pacific Basin so as to: Promote comparable safety standards; Encourage commerce among PBNCC member countries; Reduce the costs of fabrication, construction, testing, operation and maintenance; and, Facilitate the sharing of spare parts inventories[close quotes]. During the first few meetings it became apparent that further clarification of the mission statement was necessary to recognize the point that each member country has their own codes and standards and that uniformity of these codes and standards was not the objective of the working group. The objective is more oriented toward achieving a mutual understanding of the codes and standards used in each country so that purchase of items from other countries or sharing spare parts could be accomplished more efficiently. In addition, this prior knowledge of the codes and standards to which components were fabricated could be useful if a problem with a component developed in one country and assistance in solving the problem were to be provided by another country. Evaluation of the differences in codes and standards used by other countries also provides an opportunity to consider other opinions.

Ehrman, C.S. (Burns Roe Company, Oradell, NJ (United States)) Chen, P.-C. (Taiwan Power Company, Taipei (Taiwan, Province of China))

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

494