National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for frcc npcc mapp

  1. ,"Table 3B.1. FRCC Monthly Peak Hour Demand, by North American...

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    B.1. FRCC Monthly Peak Hour Demand, by North American Electric Reliability Corporation ... 3B.2. NPCC Monthly Peak Hour Demand, by North American Electric Reliability Corporation ...

  2. Property:EIA/861/NercNpcc | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Description: Nerc Npcc Entity conducts business operations within the NPCC region (Y or N) 1 References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2008 - F861 File...

  3. Property:EIA/861/NercFrcc | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Description: Nerc Frcc Entity conducts business operations within the FRCC region (Y or N) 1 References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2008 - F861 File...

  4. Maintenance personnel performance simulation (MAPPS) model: overview and evaluation efforts

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Knee, H.E.; Haas, P.M.; Siegel, A.I.; Bartter, W.D.; Wolf, J.J.; Ryan, T.G.

    1984-01-01

    The development of the MAPPS model has been completed and the model is currently undergoing evaluation. These efforts are addressing a number of identified issues concerning practicality, acceptability, usefulness, and validity. Preliminary analysis of the evaluation data that has been collected indicates that MAPPS will provide comprehensive and reliable data for PRA purposes and for a number of other applications. The MAPPS computer simulation model provides the user with a sophisticated tool for gaining insights into tasks performed by NPP maintenance personnel. Its wide variety of input parameters and output data makes it extremely flexible for application to a number of diverse applications. With the demonstration of favorable model evaluation results, the MAPPS model will represent a valuable source of NPP maintainer reliability data and provide PRA studies with a source of data on maintainers that has previously not existed.

  5. Table 8.12a Electric Noncoincident Peak Load and Capacity Margin: Summer Peak Period, 1986-2011 (Megawatts, Except as Noted)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    a Electric Noncoincident Peak Load and Capacity Margin: Summer Peak Period, 1986-2011 (Megawatts, Except as Noted) Year Noncoincident Peak Load 1 by North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) 2 Regional Assessment Area Capacity Margin 21 (percent) Eastern Interconnection ERCOT 4 Western Inter- connection All Inter- connections FRCC 5 NPCC 6 Balance of Eastern Region 3 ECAR 7,8 MAAC 8,9 MAIN 8,10 MAPP 11 MISO 12 MRO 13 PJM 14 RFC 8,15 SERC 16 SPP 17 Subtotal TRE 18 WECC 19 Total 20

  6. Word Pro - Untitled1

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    4 U.S. Energy Information Administration / Annual Energy Review 2011 Table 8.12a Electric Noncoincident Peak Load and Capacity Margin: Summer Peak Period, 1986-2011 (Megawatts, Except as Noted) Year Noncoincident Peak Load 1 by North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) 2 Regional Assessment Area Capacity Margin 21 (percent) Eastern Interconnection ERCOT 4 Western Inter- connection All Inter- connections FRCC 5 NPCC 6 Balance of Eastern Region 3 ECAR 7,8 MAAC 8,9 MAIN 8,10 MAPP 11

  7. Word Pro - Untitled1

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    5 Table 8.12b Electric Noncoincident Peak Load and Capacity Margin: Winter Peak Period, 1986-2011 (Megawatts, Except as Noted) Year Noncoincident Peak Load 1 by North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) 2 Regional Assessment Area Capacity Margin 21 (percent) Eastern Interconnection ERCOT 4 Western Inter- connection All Inter- connections FRCC 5 NPCC 6 Balance of Eastern Region 3 ECAR 7,8 MAAC 8,9 MAIN 8,10 MAPP 11 MISO 12 MRO 13 PJM 14 RFC 8,15 SERC 16 SPP 17 Subtotal TRE 18 WECC 19

  8. monthly_peak_2003.xls

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    O Form EIA-411 for 2005 Released: February 7, 2008 Next Update: October 2007 Table 3a . January Monthly Peak Hour Demand, Actual and Projected by North American Electric Reliability Council Region, 1996 through 2003 and Projected 2004 through 2005 (Megawatts and 2003 Base Year) Projected Monthly Base Year Contiguous U.S. Eastern Power Grid Texas Power Grid Western Power Grid ECAR FRCC MAAC MAIN MAPP/MR NPCC SERC SPP ERCOT WECC Peak Hour Demand (MW) Peak Hour Demand (MW) Peak Hour Demand (MW)

  9. winter_peak_2003.xls

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ) Form EIA-411 for 2005 Released: February 7, 2008 Next Update: October 2007 Table 2b . Noncoincident Winter Peak Load, Actual and Projected by North American Electric Reliability Council Region, 1990 through 2003 and Projected 2004 through 2008 (Megawatts and 2003 Base Year) Winter Noncoincident Peak Load Contiguous U.S. Eastern Power Grid Texas Power Grid Western Power Grid Projected Year Base Year ECAR FRCC MAAC MAIN MAPP (U.S. NPCC (U.S.) SERC SPP ERCOT WECC (U.S.) 1990/1991 484,231 67,097

  10. winter_peak_2004.xls

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    b . Noncoincident Winter Peak Load, Actual and Projected by North American Electric Reliability Council Region, 1990 through 2004 and Projected 2005 through 2009 (Megawatts and 2004 Base Year) Winter Noncoincident Peak Load Contiguous U.S. Eastern Power Grid Texas Power Grid Western Power Grid Projected Year Base Year ECAR FRCC MAAC MAIN MAPP/MRO (U.S.) NPCC (U.S.) SERC SPP ERCOT WECC (U.S.) 1990/1991 484,231 67,097 30,800 36,551 32,461 21,113 40,545 86,648 38,949 35,815 94,252 1991/1992 485,761

  11. net_energy_load_1990_2004.xls

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Not applicable for this table format Table 1a . Historical Net Energy For Load, Actual by North American Electric Reliability Council Region, 1990 through 2004. (Thousands of Megawatthours) Net Energy For Load (Annual) Contiguous U.S. Eastern Power Grid Texas Power Grid Western Power Grid Year ECAR FRCC MAAC MAIN MAPP/MRO (U.S.) NPCC (U.S.) SERC SPP ERCOT WECC (U.S.) 1990 2,886,496 442,507 142,502 221,099 197,326 127,102 250,681 485,205 252,037 209,789 558,248 1991 2,941,669 450,586 146,903

  12. net_energy_load_2003.xls

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    3 and Projected 2004 through 2008 (Thousands of Megawatthours and 2003 Base Year) Net Energy For Load (Annual) Contiguous U.S. Eastern Power Grid Texas Power Grid Western Power Grid Projected Year Base Year ECAR FRCC MAAC MAIN MAPP (U.S.) NPCC (U.S.) SERC SPP ERCOT WECC (U.S.) 1990 2,886,496 442,507 142,502 221,099 197,326 127,102 250,681 485,205 252,037 209,789 558,248 1991 2,941,669 450,586 146,903 228,588 205,880 129,826 253,701 501,794 257,434 211,568 555,389 1992 2,942,910 450,853 147,464

  13. net_energy_load_2004.xls

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    4 and Projected 2005 through 2009 (Thousands of Megawatthours and 2004 Base Year) Net Energy For Load (Annual) Contiguous U.S. Eastern Power Grid Texas Power Grid Western Power Grid Projected Year Base Year ECAR FRCC MAAC MAIN MAPP/MRO (U.S.) NPCC (U.S.) SERC SPP ERCOT WECC (U.S.) 1990 2,886,496 442,507 142,502 221,099 197,326 127,102 250,681 485,205 252,037 209,789 558,248 1991 2,941,669 450,586 146,903 228,588 205,880 129,826 253,701 501,794 257,434 211,568 555,389 1992 2,942,910 450,853

  14. summer_peak_1990_2004.xls

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    c . Historical Noncoincident Summer Peak Load, Actual by North American Electric Reliability Council Region, 1990 through 2004 (Megawatts) Summer Noncoincident Peak Contiguous U.S. Eastern Power Grid Texas Power Grid Western Power Grid Year ECAR FRCC MAAC MAIN MAPP/MRO (U.S.) NPCC (U.S.) SERC SPP ERCOT WECC (U.S.) 1990 546,331 79,258 27,266 42,613 40,740 24,994 44,116 94,677 52,541 42,737 97,389 1991 551,418 81,224 28,818 45,937 41,598 25,498 46,594 95,968 51,885 41,870 92,026 1992 548,707

  15. winter_peak_1990_2004.xls

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    d . Historical Noncoincident Winter Peak Load, Actual by North American Electric Reliability Council Region, 1990 through 2004 (Megawatts) Winter Noncoincident Peak Load Contiguous U.S. Eastern Power Grid Texas Power Grid Western Power Grid Year ECAR FRCC MAAC MAIN MAPP/MRO (U.S.) NPCC (U.S.) SERC SPP ERCOT WECC (U.S.) 1990/1991 484,231 67,097 30,800 36,551 32,461 21,113 40,545 86,648 38,949 35,815 94,252 1991/1992 485,761 71,181 31,153 37,983 33,420 21,432 41,866 88,422 38,759 35,448 86,097

  16. SAS Output

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    A. U.S. Transmission Circuit Outages by Type and NERC region, 2013 Outage Type FRCC MRO NPCC RFC SERC SPP TRE WECC Contiguous U.S. Circuit Outage Counts Automatic Outages...

  17. An In-situ materials analysis particle probe (MAPP) diagnostic to study particle density control and hydrogenic fuel retention in NSTX

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Allain, Jean-Paul

    2014-09-05

    A new materials analysis particle probe (MAPP) was designed, constructed and tested to develop understanding of particle control and hydrogenic fuel retention in lithium-based plasma-facing surfaces in NSTX. The novel feature of MAPP is an in-situ tool to probe the divertor NSTX floor during LLD and lithium-coating shots with subsequent transport to a post-exposure in-vacuo surface analysis chamber to measure D retention. In addition, the implications of a lithiated graphite-dominated plasma-surface environment in NSTX on LLD performance, operation and ultimately hydrogenic pumping and particle control capability are investigated in this proposal. MAPP will be an invaluable tool for erosion/redeposition simulation code validation.

  18. winter_peak_2005.xls

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    2b . Noncoincident Winter Peak Load, Actual and Projected by North American Electric Reliability Council Region, 2005 and Projected 2006 through 2010 (Megawatts and 2005 Base Year) Winter Noncoincident Peak Load Contiguous U.S. Eastern Power Grid Texas Power Grid Western Power Grid Projected Year Base Year FRCC MRO (U.S.) NPCC (U.S.) RFC SERC SPP ERCOT WECC (U.S.) 2005/2006 626,365 42,657 33,748 46,828 151,600 164,638 31,260 48,141 107,493 Contiguous U.S. Projected FRCC MRO (U.S.) NPCC (U.S.)

  19. summer_nid_cr_cm_2005.xls

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    d Form EIA-411 for 2005 Released: February 7, 2008 Next Update: October 2007 Table 4. Summer Historic and Projected Net Internal Demand, Capacity Resources, and Capacity Margins by North American Electric Reliability Council Region, 2005 and 2006 through 2010 (Megawatts and Percent) Projected Year Base Year Summer Eastern Power Grid Contiguous U.S. FRCC MRO NPCC RFC Net Internal Demand (MW) Capacity Resources (MW) Capacity Margin (percent) Net Internal Demand (MW) Capacity Resources (MW)

  20. Written Statement of Stacy Dochoda

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    FRCC physical characteristics The unique geography of the FRCC region along with the interdependence of the FRCC member systems has required close coordination of FRCC member ...

  1. Word Pro - Untitled1

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    b Electric Noncoincident Peak Load and Capacity Margin: Winter Peak Period U.S.¹ Winter Peak Load,² All Interconnections, 1986-2011 Winter Capacity Margin, 1996-2011 U.S.¹ Winter Peak Load² by NERC³ Regional Assessment Area, 2011 U.S. Energy Information Administration / Annual Energy Review 2011 263 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Gigawatts 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Percent 48 47 5 79 131 154 41 52 107 FRCC NPCC

  2. monthly_peak_2005.xls

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    3a . January Monthly Peak Hour Demand, Actual and Projected by North American Electric Reliability Council Region, 2005 and Projected 2006 through 2010 (Megawatts and 2005 Base Year) Projected Monthly Base Year Contiguous U.S. Eastern Power Grid Texas Power Grid Western Power Grid FRCC MRO NPCC RFC SERC SPP ERCOT WECC Peak Hour Demand (MW) Peak Hour Demand (MW) Peak Hour Demand (MW) Peak Hour Demand (MW) Peak Hour Demand (MW) Peak Hour Demand (MW) Peak Hour Demand (MW) Peak Hour Demand (MW) Peak

  3. monthly_peak_2006.xls

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    6 Released: February 7, 2008 Next Update: October 2008 Table 3a . January Monthly Peak Hour Demand, Actual and Projected by North American Electric Reliability Corporation Region 2006 and Projected 2007 through 2011 (Megawatts and 2006 Base Year) Projected Monthly Base Year Contiguous U.S. Eastern Power Grid Texas Power Grid Western Power Grid FRCC MRO NPCC RFC SERC SPP ERCOT WECC Peak Hour Demand (MW) Peak Hour Demand (MW) Peak Hour Demand (MW) Peak Hour Demand (MW) Peak Hour Demand (MW) Peak

  4. Next Update: November 2013

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    the - - - - - - - - - - 2011 US WIN FRCC FRCC 1e Non-Controllable Demand-Side Demand Response - - - - - - - - - - 2011 US WIN FRCC FRCC 2 Total Internal Demand 40,117 46,864 ...

  5. Form EIA-411 2011

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    2011,"US","SUM","FRCC","FRCC","1e","Non-Controllable Demand-Side Demand Response",,0,0,0,0,,0,0,0,0,0,0 2011,"US","SUM","FRCC","FRCC",2,"Total Internal ...

  6. Form EIA-411 2011

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    2011,"US","WIN","FRCC","FRCC","1e","Non-Controllable Demand-Side Demand Response",,0,0,0,0,,0,0,0,0,0,0 2011,"US","WIN","FRCC","FRCC",2,"Total Internal ...

  7. Next Update: November 2013

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Next Update: November 2013 megawatts January NERC Regional Assesment Area 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 FRCC 39,860 37,127 27,122 38,581 37,521 40,258 39,675 45,033 35,545 41,247 34,464 38,352 41,705 44,945 53,093 46,086 NPCC 41,680 41,208 40,009 44,199 45,227 43,553 42,039 45,987 66,215 47,041 43,661 45,002 46,803 45,047 43,849 45,395 Balance of Eastern Region 322,095 335,954 307,784 343,981 347,724 349,937 340,525 377,419 371,550 381,698

  8. Next Update: October 2009

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    b . Noncoincident Winter Peak Load, Actual and Projected by North American Electric Reliability Corporation Region, 2007 and Projected 2008 through 2012 (Megawatts and 2007 Base Year) 2007/2008 637,905 41,701 33,191 46,795 141,900 179,888 31,322 50,408 112,700 Contiguous U.S. FRCC MRO (U.S.) NPCC (U.S.) RFC SERC SPP TRE (ERCOT) WECC (U.S.) 656,989 49,601 34,100 48,323 147,100 182,055 31,954 47,270 116,586 669,111 50,463 35,085 48,911 149,100 185,850 32,585 48,285 118,832 680,673 51,606 36,298

  9. Next Update: October 2010

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Table 2b . Noncoincident Winter Peak Load, Actual and Projected by North American Electric Reliability Corporation Region, 2008 and Projected 2009 through 2013 (Megawatts and 2008 Base Year) 2008/2009 643,557 45,275 36,029 46,043 142,395 179,596 32,809 47,806 113,605 Contiguous U.S. FRCC MRO (U.S.) NPCC (U.S.) RFC SERC SPP TRE WECC (U.S.) 642,383 44,446 36,571 47,098 145,800 181,045 32,636 43,463 111,324 651,534 45,099 36,884 47,076 148,000 183,608 33,308 44,463 113,096 664,867 46,140 37,613

  10. table01.chp:Corel VENTURA

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    2. Noncoincident Peak Load, by North American Electric Reliability Corporation Assessment Area, 1990-2010 Actual, 2011-2015 Projected (Megawatts) Interconnection NERC Regional Assesment Area 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 FRCC 27,266 28,818 30,601 32,823 32,904 34,524 35,444 35,375 38,730 37,493 37,194 39,062 40,696 40,475 42,383 46,396 45,751 46,676 44,836 NPCC 44,116 46,594 43,658 46,706 47,581 47,705 45,094 49,269 49,566 52,855

  11. monthly_peak_bymonth_2010.xls

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    A.1. January Monthly Peak Hour Demand, by North American Electric Reliability Corporation Assesment Area, 1996-2010 Actual, 2011-2012 Projected (Megawatts) January NERC Regional Assesment Area 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011E 2012E FRCC 39,860 37,127 27,122 38,581 37,521 40,258 39,675 45,033 35,545 41,247 34,464 38,352 41,705 44,945 53,093 46,839 47,613 NPCC 41,680 41,208 40,009 44,199 45,227 43,553 42,039 45,987 66,215 47,041 43,661 45,002 46,803

  12. net_energy_load_2010.xls

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    1. Net Energy For Load, Actual and Projected by North American Electric Reliability Corporation Assessment Area, 1990-2010 Actual, 2011-2015 Projected (Thousands of Megawatthours) Interconnection NERC Regional Assesment Area 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FRCC 142,502 146,903 147,464 153,468 159,861 169,021 173,377 175,557 188,384 188,598 196,561 200,134 211,116 NPCC 250,681 253,701 252,256 257,447 259,947 261,235 263,125 264,464 268,309 277,902 281,518 282,670

  13. peak_load_2010.xls

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    2. Noncoincident Peak Load, by North American Electric Reliability Corporation Assessment Area, 1990-2010 Actual, 2011-2015 Projected (Megawatts) Interconnection NERC Regional Assesment Area 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 FRCC 27,266 28,818 30,601 32,823 32,904 34,524 35,444 35,375 38,730 37,493 37,194 39,062 40,696 40,475 42,383 46,396 45,751 46,676 44,836 NPCC 44,116 46,594 43,658 46,706 47,581 47,705 45,094 49,269 49,566 52,855

  14. summer_capacity_2010.xls

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Interconnection NERC Regional Assesment Area 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 FRCC 27,162 27,773 28,898 29,435 30,537 31,649 31,868 32,874 34,562 34,832 35,666 38,932 37,951 40,387 42,243 45,950 45,345 46,434 44,660 46,263 NPCC 46,016 45,952 46,007 46,380 47,465 48,290 48,950 50,240 51,760 53,450 54,270 55,888 55,164 53,936 51,580 57,402 60,879 58,221 59,896 55,730 Balance of Eastern Region 332,679 337,297 341,869 349,984

  15. Buildings Energy Data Book: 6.2 Electricity Generation, Transmission, and Distribution

    Buildings Energy Data Book [EERE]

    9 2009 Peak Load and Capacity Margin, Summer and Winter by NERC Region (MW) NERC Region Capacity Margin Capacity Margin TRE 16.7% 19.1% FRCC 6.0% 2.0% MRO (U.S.) 24.6% 26.8% NPCC (U.S.) 29.1% 43.2% RFC 25.2% 33.3% SERC 24.6% 26.2% SPP 16.4% 34.6% WECC 19.4% 29.6% U.S. TOTAL 22.2% 28.5% Note(s): Source(s): 128,245 109,565 725,958 668,818 1) Summer Demand includes the months of June, July, August, and September. 2) Winter Demand includes December of the previous year and January-March of the

  16. Maintenance personnel performance simulation (MAPPS): a model for predicting maintenance performance reliability in nuclear power plants

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Knee, H.E.; Krois, P.A.; Haas, P.M.; Siegel, A.I.; Ryan, T.G.

    1983-01-01

    The NRC has developed a structured, quantitative, predictive methodology in the form of a computerized simulation model for assessing maintainer task performance. Objective of the overall program is to develop, validate, and disseminate a practical, useful, and acceptable methodology for the quantitative assessment of NPP maintenance personnel reliability. The program was organized into four phases: (1) scoping study, (2) model development, (3) model evaluation, and (4) model dissemination. The program is currently nearing completion of Phase 2 - Model Development.

  17. Tampa Electric Co | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    for 2010 - File1a1 Energy Information Administration Form 8262 3 4 EIA Form 861 Data Utility Id 18454 Utility Location Yes Ownership I NERC Location FRCC NERC FRCC Yes...

  18. winter_schedule3_2010.xls

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    meter ge - - - - - - - - - - 2010 US WIN FRCC - 1e Non-Controllable Demand-Side Demand Response - - - - - - - - - - 2010 US WIN FRCC - 2 Total Internal Demand 46,135 47,613 ...

  19. summer_schedule3_2010.xls

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    meter ge - - - - - - - - - - 2010 US SUM FRCC - 1e Non-Controllable Demand-Side Demand Response - - - - - - - - - - 2010 US SUM FRCC - 2 Total Internal Demand 45,722 46,091 ...

  20. Worksheet

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ,2010,"US","WIN","FRCC","-","1e","Non-Controllable Demand-Side Demand Response",,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 ,2010,"US","WIN","FRCC","-",2,"Total Internal ...

  1. Worksheet

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ,2010,"US","SUM","FRCC","-","1e","Non-Controllable Demand-Side Demand Response",,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 ,2010,"US","SUM","FRCC","-",2,"Total Internal ...

  2. Energetix | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Utility Location Yes Ownership R NERC Location NPCC NERC NPCC Yes Activity Wholesale Marketing Yes Activity Retail Marketing Yes This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by...

  3. Town of Boylston, Massachusetts (Utility Company) | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    2010 - File1a1 EIA Form 861 Data Utility Id 2086 Utility Location Yes Ownership M NERC Location NPCC NERC NPCC Yes ISO NE Yes Activity Buying Transmission Yes Activity...

  4. Energy Coop of New York, Inc | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    2010 - File1a1 EIA Form 861 Data Utility Id 5880 Utility Location Yes Ownership R NERC Location NPCC NERC NPCC Yes Activity Retail Marketing Yes This article is a stub. You can...

  5. Town of Wakefield, Massachusetts (Utility Company) | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    - File1a1 EIA Form 861 Data Utility Id 19979 Utility Location Yes Ownership M NERC Location NPCC NERC NPCC Yes Activity Buying Transmission Yes Activity Distribution Yes...

  6. Village of Solvay, New York (Utility Company) | Open Energy Informatio...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Id 17512 Utility Location Yes Ownership M NERC Location NPCC NERC NPCC Yes Activity Wholesale Marketing Yes This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility...

  7. New York Mun Power Agency | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Id 13539 Utility Location Yes Ownership A NERC Location NPCC NERC NPCC Yes Activity Wholesale Marketing Yes This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility...

  8. Vermont Yankee Nucl Pwr Corp | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Utility Location Yes Ownership I NERC Location NPCC NERC NPCC Yes ISO NE Yes Activity Wholesale Marketing Yes This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility...

  9. HQ Energy Services (US), Inc | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Data Utility Id 21249 Utility Location Yes Ownership W NERC Location NPCC NERC NPCC Yes RTO PJM Yes ISO NY Yes ISO MISO Yes ISO NE Yes Activity Generation Yes Activity Buying...

  10. Rockland Electric Co | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Data Utility Id 16213 Utility Location Yes Ownership I NERC Location NPCC NERC NPCC Yes RTO PJM Yes Activity Transmission Yes Activity Distribution Yes This article is a stub. You...

  11. EIS-0465: Pepco Holdings, Inc. Mid-Atlantic Power Path (MAPP) Project, Prince George's, Calvert, and Wicomico Counties, Maryland, and Sussex County, Delaware

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pepco Holdings, Inc., cancelled its proposed Phase II of the Mid-Atlantic Power Pathway transmission line project and DOE cancelled preparation of an EIS on the potential environmental impacts of a proposed federal loan guarantee for the project.

  12. Analysis of the Clean Energy Standard Act of 2012

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    4 Appendix C: Map of NEMS Electricity Market Module Regions 1 Texas Regional Entity (ERCT) 12 SERC Delta (SRDA) 2 Florida Reliability Coordinating Council (FRCC) 13 SERC ...

  13. Form EIA-411 for 2006",,"WINTER

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    WINTER" ,"Released: February 7, 2008" ,"Next Update: October 2008" "Table 5j. Winter (FRCC) Historical and Projected Demand and Capacity, Calendar Year 2006 " "Region","FRCC" "Subregion", "Country","U" ,"WINTER",,"Actual","Projected"

  14. Massachusetts Bay Trans Auth | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    NPCC Yes Operates Generating Plant Yes Activity Generation Yes Activity Wholesale Marketing Yes Activity Retail Marketing Yes Alt Fuel Vehicle Yes Alt Fuel Vehicle2 Yes This...

  15. Sempra Energy Trading Corp | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Location Yes Ownership R NERC Location NPCC Activity Buying Transmission Yes Activity Wholesale Marketing Yes Activity Bundled Services Yes This article is a stub. You can help...

  16. summer_peak_2004.xls

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    2009 (Megawatts and 2004 Base Year) Summer Noncoincident Peak Contiguous U.S. Eastern Power Grid Texas Power Grid Western Power Grid Projected Year Base Year ECAR FRCC MAAC...

  17. summer_peak_2003.xls

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    2008 (Megawatts and 2003 Base Year) Summer Noncoincident Peak Contiguous U.S. Eastern Power Grid Texas Power Grid Western Power Grid Projected Year Base Year ECAR FRCC MAAC...

  18. Southeastern Power Admin | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Location SERC NERC FRCC Yes NERC SERC Yes Activity Buying Transmission Yes Activity Wholesale Marketing Yes This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility...

  19. Form EIA-411 for 2011

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    B.1. FRCC monthly peak hour demand, by North American Electric Reliability Corporation Assesment Area," "1996-2011 actual, 2012-2013 projected" "megawatts" "FRCC","Year","January","February","March","April","May","June","July","August","September","October","November","December"

  20. Released: April 2016

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    B.1. FRCC monthly peak hour demand, by North American Electric Reliability Corporation Assesment Area," "1996-2014 actual, 2015-2016 projected" "megawatts" "FRCC","Year","January","February","March","April","May","June","July","August","September","October","November","December"

  1. NYSEG Solutions Inc | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Utility Id 26650 Utility Location Yes Ownership R NERC NPCC Yes Activity Wholesale Marketing Yes Activity Retail Marketing Yes This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by...

  2. Agway Energy Services, LLC | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    2010 - File1a1 EIA Form 861 Data Utility Id 113 Utility Location Yes Ownership R NERC Location NPCC ISO NY Yes Activity Retail Marketing Yes This article is a stub. You can...

  3. Major Energy Electric Services | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    - File1a1 EIA Form 861 Data Utility Id 56504 Utility Location Yes Ownership R NERC Location NPCC ISO NY Yes Activity Retail Marketing Yes This article is a stub. You can...

  4. Glacial Energy Holdings | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1a1 EIA Form 861 Data Utility Id 54871 Utility Location Yes Ownership R NERC ERCOT Yes NERC MRO Yes NERC NPCC Yes NERC RFC Yes Activity...

  5. Robison Energy, LLC | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1a1 EIA Form 861 Data Utility Id 16177 Utility Location Yes Ownership R NERC NPCC Yes Activity Retail Marketing Yes This article is a...

  6. Application for Presidential Permit OE Docket No. PP-400 TDI-NE- New England Clean Power Link Project: Motion to Intervene of The Northeast Power Coordinating Council, Inc.

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Northeast Power Coordinating Council, Inc. (NPCC) submits its Motion to Intervene the New England Clean Power Link Project pursuant to Rules 212 and 214 of the Rules of Practice and Procedures of...

  7. AES Eastern Energy LP | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    NPCC Yes ISO NY Yes Operates Generating Plant Yes Activity Generation Yes Activity Wholesale Marketing Yes This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility...

  8. Connecticut Municipal Electric Energy Cooperative | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    NPCC Yes ISO NE Yes Operates Generating Plant Yes Activity Generation Yes Activity Wholesale Marketing Yes This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it....

  9. JP Morgan | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    NPCC Yes NERC RFC Yes NERC SERC Yes NERC SPP Yes NERC WECC Yes ISO CA Yes ISO Ercot Yes RTO PJM Yes ISO NY Yes RTO SPP Yes ISO MISO Yes ISO NE Yes ISO Other Yes Activity Retail...

  10. Application for Presidential Permit OE Docket No. PP-400 TDI...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Northeast Power Coordinating Council, Inc. (NPCC) submits its Motion to Intervene the New England Clean Power Link Project pursuant to Rules 212 and 214 of the Rules of Practice ...

  11. Waddington, NY Natural Gas Exports to Canada

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    WINTER Table 5j . Winter (FRCC) Historical and Projected Demand and Capacity, Calendar Year 2007 Region FRCC Subregion Country U WINTER Actual Line# DESCRIPTION 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 1 Unrestricted Non-coincident Peak Demand (Starting Point) = 2+1a+1b-1c-1d 41,701 49,601 50,463 51,606 1a New Conservation (Energy Efficiency) - - - 1b Estimated Diversity - - - - 1c Additions for non-member load (load served by non-registered LSE's in a region) - - - - 1d Stand-by Load Under

  12. Form EIA-411 for 2006",,"SUMMER

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    SUMMER" ,"Released: February 7, 2008" ,"Next Update: October 2008" "Table 5a. Summer (FRCC) Historical and Projected Demand and Capacity, Calendar Year 2006 " "(Megawatts)" "Region","FRCC" "Subregion", "Country","U"," " ,"SUMMER",,"Actual","Projected" "Line#",,"DESCRIPTION",2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016

  13. Next Update: November 2016 Geographic Area Capacity In-Service

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Geographic Area Capacity In-Service Data Year NERC Region Type Operating (kV) Design (kV) Rating (MVa) Month/Year From Terminal To Terminal Length (Miles) Type Company Code Company Name Organizational Type Ownership (Percent) Project Name Level of Certainty Primary Driver 1 Primary Driver 2 2014 FRCC AC 200-299 115 460 1/2016 SUB 4 230.00 SUB 7 230.00 3.8 OH 18445 of Tallahassee M 100% 0.00 - SUB 7 230.00 Under Constructio Reliability 2014 FRCC AC 100-120 115 232 12/2016 Sub 14 115 Sub 7 115 6.0

  14. Vista Center, New Jersey: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Vista Center, New Jersey: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 40.1592798, -74.3179248 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  15. Cumberland Center, Maine: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Cumberland Center, Maine: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 43.7964679, -70.2589388 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  16. Falmouth Foreside, Maine: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Falmouth Foreside, Maine: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 43.7348031, -70.2078262 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  17. Simsbury Center, Connecticut: Energy Resources | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Simsbury Center, Connecticut: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 41.88295, -72.81138 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  18. Essex Village, Connecticut: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Essex Village, Connecticut: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 41.355949, -72.389488 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  19. Southington, Connecticut: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Southington, Connecticut: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 41.5964869, -72.8776013 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  20. Hazardville, Connecticut: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Hazardville, Connecticut: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 41.9873187, -72.5448093 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  1. New Britain, Connecticut: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    New Britain, Connecticut: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 41.6612104, -72.7795419 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  2. Tariffville, Connecticut: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Tariffville, Connecticut: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 41.9087087, -72.7600951 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  3. Willimantic, Connecticut: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Willimantic, Connecticut: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 41.7106543, -72.2081338 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  4. Val Verde County, Texas: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Val Verde County, Texas: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 29.8687682, -101.1617356 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  5. Great Bend, North Dakota: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Great Bend, North Dakota: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 46.1538473, -96.8020228 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  6. EIS-0238: Withdrawal of Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Proposed Minnesota Agri-Power Plant and Associated Facilities On October 7, 1998 (63 FR ... facility, known as the Minnesota Agri- Power Plant (MAPP), and associated transmission ...

  7. Carrboro, North Carolina: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Carrboro, North Carolina: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 35.9101438, -79.0752895 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  8. Alamance, North Carolina: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Alamance, North Carolina: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 36.0351361, -79.4858549 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  9. Matthews, North Carolina: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Matthews, North Carolina: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 35.1168131, -80.7236804 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  10. Asheville, North Carolina: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Asheville, North Carolina: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 35.6009452, -82.554015 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  11. New Kingman-Butler, Arizona: Energy Resources | Open Energy Informatio...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Kingman-Butler, Arizona: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 35.2593696, -114.0190671 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  12. Alfalfa County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Alfalfa County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 36.7435919, -98.3964938 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  13. Augusta County, Virginia: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Augusta County, Virginia: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 38.2004562, -79.2451149 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  14. Amherst County, Virginia: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Amherst County, Virginia: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 37.5588285, -79.1096901 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  15. Hanover County, Virginia: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Hanover County, Virginia: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 37.7772071, -77.5160788 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  16. Nantucket School | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    In Service Owner Nantucket School Energy Purchaser Nantucket School Location Nantucket MA Coordinates 41.27214604, -70.09777308 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  17. Town of Barnstable | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Service Owner Town of Barnstable Energy Purchaser Town of Barnstable Location Barnstable MA Coordinates 41.66402376, -70.30557185 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  18. Hanover | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Under Construction Owner City of Hanover Developer City of Hanover Location Hanover MA Coordinates 42.13095657, -70.83262324 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  19. Clarian Power | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Power Place: Seattle, Washington Sector: Solar Website: www.clariantechnologies.comma Coordinates: 47.6062095, -122.3320708 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  20. Ipswich | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Purchaser Ipswich Municipal Light Department Ipswich Public Schools Location Ipswich MA Coordinates 42.71649202, -70.84198147 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  1. Berkshire East Ski Area | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Energy Development Energy Purchaser Berkshire East Ski Area Location Charlemont MA Coordinates 42.61621237, -72.86660671 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  2. Eclipse | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Clipper Windpower Development Company Energy Purchaser MidAmerican Energy Location Adair IA Coordinates 41.53604897, -94.65567112 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  3. Roeder Farms | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Developer 5045 Wind Partners Energy Purchaser Alliant Energy Location Des Moines IA Coordinates 43.29729211, -93.28315258 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  4. Laurel | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    RPM Access Wind Development Energy Purchaser MidAmerican Energy Location Haverhill IA Coordinates 41.89096884, -92.97214508 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  5. Morning Light | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Clipper Windpower Development Company Energy Purchaser MidAmerican Energy Location Casey IA Coordinates 41.44819506, -94.58280087 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  6. Bulldog | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Bulldog LLC Energy Purchaser Farmers' Cooperative of Greenfield Location Greenfield IA Coordinates 41.22708706, -94.43487167 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  7. Wolverine | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Wolverine LLC Energy Purchaser Farmers' Cooperative of Greenfield Location Greenfield IA Coordinates 41.39310112, -94.44487095 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  8. Pioneer Grove | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Acciona Energy Energy Purchaser Central Iowa Power Cooperative Location Mechanicsville IA Coordinates 41.85086289, -91.23407364 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  9. Meadow Ridge | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    (community owned) Energy Purchaser Central Iowa Power Cooperative Location Greenfield IA Coordinates 41.39004255, -94.44637299 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  10. Cumberland Rose | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Purchaser City of Fontanelle - excess to Central Iowa Power Coopeative Location Orient IA Coordinates 41.22534409, -94.44139481 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  11. Kirkwood Community College | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Kirkwood Community College Energy Purchaser Alliant Energy Location Cedar Rapids IA Coordinates 41.91674479, -91.65078163 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  12. New Harvest | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Iberdrola Renewables Energy Purchaser ComEd and Ameren Illinois Location Schleswig IA Coordinates 42.16197194, -95.44696569 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  13. Elk | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Access Wind Development Energy Purchaser Central Iowa Power Cooperative Location Greeley IA Coordinates 42.58659755, -91.36861324 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  14. New London | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Developer Shermco Industries Location New London IA Coordinates 40.95478446, -91.39509201 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  15. Hawkeye | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Access Wind Development Energy Purchaser Central Iowa Power Cooperative Location Rippey IA Coordinates 42.92513165, -92.02989578 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  16. net_energy_load_2006.xls

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Area Power Pool (MAPP) to Midwest Reliability Organization (MRO). * The MRO, SERC, and SPP regional boundaries were altered as utilities changed reliability organizations. ...

  17. summer_peak_2005.xls

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Area Power Pool (MAPP) to Midwest Reliability Organization (MRO). * The MRO, SERC, and SPP regional boundaries were altered as utilities changed reliability organizations. ...

  18. ,"Table 1. Net Energy For Load, Actual and Projected by North...

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Area Power Pool (MAPP) to Midwest Reliability Organization (MRO)." ," * The MRO, SERC, and SPP regional boundaries were altered as utilities changed reliability organizations. ...

  19. ,"Projected Year Base","Year","Summer",,,"Eastern Power Grid...

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ... name has changed from Mid-Continent Area Power Pool (MAPP) to Midwest Reliability Organization (MRO)." ," * ReliabilityFirst Corporation (RFC) came into existence on January 1, ...

  20. ,"Table 2a. Noncoincident Summer Peak Load, Actual and Projected...

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Area Power Pool (MAPP) to Midwest Reliability Organization (MRO)." ," * The MRO, SERC, and SPP regional boundaries were altered as utilities changed reliability organizations. ...

  1. net_energy_load_2005.xls

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Area Power Pool (MAPP) to Midwest Reliability Organization (MRO). * The MRO, SERC, and SPP regional boundaries were altered as utilities changed reliability organizations. ...

  2. Doctor Phillips, Florida: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Doctor Phillips, Florida: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 28.4494501, -81.4922945 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  3. Mountain View, Colorado: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Mountain View, Colorado: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 39.7744311, -105.0555389 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  4. Battle Mountain, Nevada: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Battle Mountain, Nevada: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 40.6421334, -116.9342671 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  5. Rocky Mountain, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Rocky Mountain, Oklahoma: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 35.8053663, -94.7674486 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  6. Albuquerque, New Mexico: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Albuquerque, New Mexico: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 35.0844909, -106.6511367 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  7. Canadian Hills (Repower) | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Energy Energy Purchaser Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority SWEPCO Location Calumet OK Coordinates 35.66212553, -98.12820911 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  8. Blackwell | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Energy Purchaser Oklahoma State University via Oklahoma Gas & Electric Location Nardin OK Coordinates 36.85261694, -97.43310928 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  9. Canadian Hills (Mitsubishi) | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Energy Energy Purchaser Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority SWEPCO Location Calumet OK Coordinates 35.69756036, -98.20438385 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  10. Minco III | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Energy Resources Energy Purchaser Golden Spread Electric Cooperative Location Minco OK Coordinates 35.35444115, -98.13928127 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  11. Chisolm View | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Developer TradeWind Energy Energy Purchaser Alabama Power Company Location Hunter OK Coordinates 36.59527057, -97.54501104 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  12. Abita Springs, Louisiana: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Abita Springs, Louisiana: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 30.4785257, -90.0375755 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  13. Broad Brook, Connecticut: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Broad Brook, Connecticut: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 41.9123195, -72.5450873 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  14. Savage-Guilford, Maryland: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Savage-Guilford, Maryland: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 39.144487, -76.8317325 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  15. Atkinson County, Georgia: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Atkinson County, Georgia: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 31.2932161, -82.8640623 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  16. University Heights, Ohio: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    University Heights, Ohio: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 41.4978306, -81.5373456 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  17. Mass Energy Consumers Alliance | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Massachusetts Zip: 02130 Region: Greater Boston Area Website: www.massenergy.comindex.html Coordinates: 42.3123967, -71.1141461 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  18. Hampstead, New Hampshire: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Hampstead, New Hampshire: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 42.8745323, -71.1811714 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  19. Greenland, New Hampshire: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Greenland, New Hampshire: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 43.0361995, -70.8328322 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  20. Woodstock, New Hampshire: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Woodstock, New Hampshire: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 43.9775681, -71.6850802 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  1. Haverhill, New Hampshire: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Haverhill, New Hampshire: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 44.0345102, -72.0639781 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  2. Littleton, New Hampshire: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Littleton, New Hampshire: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 44.3061725, -71.7700885 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  3. Franconia, New Hampshire: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Franconia, New Hampshire: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 44.2270075, -71.7478646 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  4. Newmarket, New Hampshire: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Newmarket, New Hampshire: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 43.2778549, -71.8734139 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  5. Newington, New Hampshire: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Newington, New Hampshire: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 43.1000871, -70.8336668 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  6. Deerfield, New Hampshire: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Deerfield, New Hampshire: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 44.2306195, -71.6170274 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  7. Livermore, New Hampshire: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Livermore, New Hampshire: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 44.0745127, -71.3772971 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  8. Merrimack, New Hampshire: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Merrimack, New Hampshire: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 42.8650864, -71.4934004 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  9. Nottingham, New Hampshire: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Nottingham, New Hampshire: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 43.1145285, -71.099784 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  10. Newfields, New Hampshire: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Newfields, New Hampshire: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 43.0370316, -70.9383906 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  11. Brentwood, New Hampshire: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Brentwood, New Hampshire: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 42.9786981, -71.0728369 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  12. Shelburne, New Hampshire: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Shelburne, New Hampshire: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 44.4011722, -71.0747975 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  13. Mingyang | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    search Name: Mingyang Place: Beijing, China Sector: Wind energy Product: Wind Turbines Coordinates: 39.904667, 116.408198 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  14. Moffat County, Colorado: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Moffat County, Colorado: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 40.6138379, -108.2377519 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  15. Washington County, Florida: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Washington County, Florida: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 30.548737, -85.684578 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  16. Washington County, Georgia: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Washington County, Georgia: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 32.962702, -82.820974 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  17. Lemon Grove, California: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Lemon Grove, California: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 32.7425516, -117.0314172 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  18. French Camp, California: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    French Camp, California: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 37.8840922, -121.2710555 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  19. ALD Vacuum Technologies GmbH | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    vacuum process equipment, including polycrystalline silicon furnaces for PV feedstock recycling. Coordinates: 50.135387, 8.916574 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  20. Clendenin, West Virginia: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Clendenin, West Virginia: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 38.4887089, -81.3481745 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  1. Morgantown, West Virginia: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Morgantown, West Virginia: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 39.629526, -79.9558968 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  2. CoastalXethanol LLC | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    LLC Place: Savannah, Georgia Product: Focused on development of ethanol plants. Coordinates: 35.224485, -88.245639 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  3. Pondera County, Montana: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Pondera County, Montana: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 48.2321517, -112.2886317 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  4. Granite County, Montana: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Granite County, Montana: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 46.3374643, -113.4647823 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  5. Daniels County, Montana: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Daniels County, Montana: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 48.7744137, -105.7248763 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  6. Rosebud County, Montana: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Rosebud County, Montana: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 46.3904836, -106.5944313 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  7. Cascade County, Montana: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Cascade County, Montana: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.4688355, -111.5453228 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  8. Inyo County, California: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Inyo County, California: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 36.3091865, -117.5495846 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  9. Napa County, California: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Napa County, California: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 38.5024689, -122.2653887 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  10. Yolo County, California: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Yolo County, California: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 38.7646021, -121.9017954 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  11. Germencik Geothermal Power Plant | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Facility Power Plant Sector Geothermal energy Location Information Location Aydin, Turkey Coordinates 37.878694084384, 27.608050344279 Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  12. Gumuskoy Geothermal Power Plant | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Plant, ORC Sector Geothermal energy Location Information Location Ortaklar, Aydin, Turkey Coordinates 37.859153868187, 27.476995463949 Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  13. Sustec Schwarze Pumpe GmbH SVZ | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Pumpe turns various components such as - plastics, wood and municipal waste - into methanol. Coordinates: 51.505621, 14.335806 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  14. Wabaunsee County, Kansas: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Wabaunsee County, Kansas: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 38.9092089, -96.1526985 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  15. Bitter Springs, Arizona: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Bitter Springs, Arizona: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 36.6285991, -111.6543255 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  16. Yucca Valley, California: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Yucca Valley, California: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 34.1141743, -116.432235 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  17. Genesee County, New York: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Genesee County, New York: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 42.9837843, -78.1564432 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  18. Hernando County, Florida: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Hernando County, Florida: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 28.5578826, -82.4752757 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  19. Brimfield, Massachusetts: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Brimfield, Massachusetts: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 42.1228721, -72.2009117 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  20. Wilbraham, Massachusetts: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Wilbraham, Massachusetts: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 42.1237053, -72.4314731 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  1. Weweantic, Massachusetts: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Weweantic, Massachusetts: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 41.7353817, -70.7319794 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  2. Blandford, Massachusetts: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Blandford, Massachusetts: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 42.1806463, -72.9273224 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  3. Lynnfield, Massachusetts: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Lynnfield, Massachusetts: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 42.5389836, -71.0481084 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  4. Brookline, Massachusetts: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Brookline, Massachusetts: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 42.3317642, -71.1211635 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  5. Sturbridge, Massachusetts: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Sturbridge, Massachusetts: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 42.108428, -72.0786871 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  6. Topsfield, Massachusetts: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Topsfield, Massachusetts: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 42.6375935, -70.9494966 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  7. Watertown, Massachusetts: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Watertown, Massachusetts: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 42.3709299, -71.1828321 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  8. Wellesley, Massachusetts: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Wellesley, Massachusetts: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 42.2964859, -71.2925571 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  9. Southwick, Massachusetts: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Southwick, Massachusetts: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 42.0548167, -72.7703724 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  10. Royalston, Massachusetts: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Royalston, Massachusetts: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 42.6775856, -72.1878604 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  11. Granville, Massachusetts: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Granville, Massachusetts: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 42.0667605, -72.8614874 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  12. Hoffman Estates, Illinois: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Hoffman Estates, Illinois: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 42.0428051, -88.079795 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  13. Vermillion, South Dakota: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Vermillion, South Dakota: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 42.7794417, -96.9292104 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  14. Onondaga County, New York: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Onondaga County, New York: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 43.026819, -76.1783739 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  15. El Dorado Hills, California: Energy Resources | Open Energy Informatio...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Dorado Hills, California: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 38.6857367, -121.082167 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  16. Brookhaven, West Virginia: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Brookhaven, West Virginia: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 39.6117487, -79.904506 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  17. Quartz Hill, California: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Quartz Hill, California: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 34.6452645, -118.2181308 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  18. Waimanalo Beach, Hawaii: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Waimanalo Beach, Hawaii: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 21.3402778, -157.7027778 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  19. South Park Township, Pennsylvania: Energy Resources | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Park Township, Pennsylvania: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 40.29695, -79.993864 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  20. Sunland Park, New Mexico: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Sunland Park, New Mexico: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 31.796496, -106.5799891 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  1. Eddy County, New Mexico: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Eddy County, New Mexico: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 32.4170622, -104.4723301 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  2. Quay County, New Mexico: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Quay County, New Mexico: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 34.9569924, -103.7289167 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  3. Next Update: November 2013

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Next Update: November 2013 Table 3B.1. FRCC monthly peak hour demand, by North American Electric Reliability Corporation Assesment Area, 1996-2011 actual, 2012-2013 projected megawatts FRCC Year January February March April May June July August September October November December 1996 39,860 41,896 32,781 28,609 32,059 33,886 35,444 34,341 34,797 30,037 29,033 34,191 1997 37,127 28,144 27,998 28,458 33,859 34,125 35,356 35,375 33,620 31,798 27,669 31,189 1998 27,122 28,116 29,032 28,008 32,879

  4. monthly_peak_byarea_2010.xls

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    B.1. FRCC Monthly Peak Hour Demand, by North American Electric Reliability Corporation Assesment Area, 1996-2010 Actual, 2011-2012 Projected (Megawatts) FRCC Year January February March April May June July August September October November December 1996 39,860 41,896 32,781 28,609 32,059 33,886 35,444 34,341 34,797 30,037 29,033 34,191 1997 37,127 28,144 27,998 28,458 33,859 34,125 35,356 35,375 33,620 31,798 27,669 31,189 1998 27,122 28,116 29,032 28,008 32,879 37,153 36,576 38,730 34,650

  5. Next Update: November 2016

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    3B.1. FRCC monthly peak hour demand, by North American Electric Reliability Corporation Assesment Area, 1996-2014 actual, 2015-2016 projected megawatts FRCC Year January February March April May June July August September October November December 1996 39,860 41,896 32,781 28,609 32,059 33,886 35,444 34,341 34,797 30,037 29,033 34,191 1997 37,127 28,144 27,998 28,458 33,859 34,125 35,356 35,375 33,620 31,798 27,669 31,189 1998 27,122 28,116 29,032 28,008 32,879 37,153 36,576 38,730 34,650 33,066

  6. summer_nid_cr_cm_1990_2004.xls

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    u Form EIA-411 for 2006 Released: February 7, 2008 Next Update: Not applicable for this table format Table 4a . Summer Historic Net Internal Demand, Capacity Resources, and Capacity Margins by North American Electric Reliability Council Region, 1990 thro (Megawatts and Percent) Year Summer Contiguous U.S. ECAR FRCC MAAC Net Internal Demand (MW) Capacity Resources (MW) Capacity Margin (percent) Net Internal Demand (MW) Capacity Resources (MW) Capacity Margin (percent) Net Internal Demand (MW)

  7. summer_nid_cr_cm_2003.xls

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    t Form EIA-411 for 2005 Released: February 7, 2008 Next Update: October 2007 Table 4. Summer Historic and Projected Net Internal Demand, Capacity Resources, and Capacity Margins by North American Electric Reliability Council Region, 1990 (Megawatts and Percent) Projected Year Base Year Summer Contiguous U.S. ECAR FRCC MAAC Net Internal Demand (MW) Capacity Resources (MW) Capacity Margin (percent) Net Internal Demand (MW) Capacity Resources (MW) Capacity Margin (percent) Net Internal Demand (MW)

  8. summer_nid_cr_cm_2004.xls

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Form EIA-411 for 2005 Released: February 7, 2008 Next Update: October 2007 Table 4. Summer Historic and Projected Net Internal Demand, Capacity Resources, and Capacity Margins by North American Electric Reliability Council Regio (Megawatts and Percent) Projected Year Base Year Summer Contiguous U.S. ECAR FRCC MAAC Net Internal Demand (MW) Capacity Resources (MW) Capacity Margin (percent) Net Internal Demand (MW) Capacity Resources (MW) Capacity Margin (percent) Net Internal Demand (MW) Capacity

  9. Slide 1

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    11 10 19 22 21 20 15 14 9 13 5 5 6 1 2 3 4 16 17 8 18 Electricity Market Module Regions 1 - Texas Reliability Entity (ERCT) 2 - Florida Reliability Coordinating Council (FRCC) 3 - Midwest Reliability Organization - East (MROE) 4 - Midwest Reliability Organization - West (MROW) 5 - Northeast Power Coordinating Council / New England (NEWE) 6 - Northeast Power Coordinating Council / NYC - Westchester (NYCW) 7 - Northeast Power Coordinating Council / Long Island (NYLI) 8 - Northeast Power

  10. KODE Novus Phase II | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    In Service Owner DeWind Developer DeWind Energy Purchaser Xcel Energy Location Guymon OK Coordinates 36.53170885, -101.3325691 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  11. Frisco | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner DeWind Developer DeWind Location Guymon OK Coordinates 36.49783848, -101.4879227 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  12. TiSol | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Product: California-based start up focused on the production of dye sensitized solar cells. Coordinates: 29.690847, -95.196308 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  13. Motech Industries Inc | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Motech Industries Inc Place: Hsin, Taiwan Product: Taiwan-based manufacturer of PV cells. Coordinates: 38.401501, 112.730118 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  14. Nick's Utility | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Ownership F NERC Location WECC, MAPP NERC MRO Yes NERC SPP Yes NERC WECC Yes ISO CA Yes RTO SPP Yes ISO MISO Yes ISO Other Yes Activity Generation Yes Activity Transmission Yes...

  15. DH Blattner | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Sector Wind energy Facility Type Small Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Location Avon MN Coordinates 45.604755, -94.443096 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  16. O:\\EA-163.ORD

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    PJM is a security coordinator in the Mid-Atlantic Area Council (MAAP) region of the North ... only when total exports between the Mid-Continent Area Power Pool (MAPP) and Manitoba ...

  17. O:\\EA-158.ORD

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    More specifically, MP&L PJM is a security coordinator in the Mid-Atlantic Area Council ... only when total exports between the Mid-Continent Area Power Pool (MAPP) and Manitoba ...

  18. O:\\EA-161.ORD

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    PJM is a security coordinator in the Mid-Atlantic Area Council (MAAP) region of the North ... only when total exports between the Mid-Continent Area Power Pool (MAPP) and Manitoba ...

  19. O:\\EA-159.ORD

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    PJM is a security coordinator in the Mid-Atlantic Area Council (MAAP) region of the North ... only when total exports between the Mid-Continent Area Power Pool (MAPP) and Manitoba ...

  20. O:\\EA-171.ORD

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    PJM is a security coordinator in the Mid-Atlantic Area Council (MAAP) region of the North ... only when total exports between the Mid-Continent Area Power Pool (MAPP) and Manitoba ...

  1. O:\\EA-168.ORD

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    PJM is a security coordinator in the Mid-Atlantic Area Council (MAAP) region of the North ... only when total exports between the Mid-Continent Area Power Pool (MAPP) and Manitoba ...

  2. O:\\EA-160.ORD

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    PJM is a security coordinator in the Mid-Atlantic Area Council (MAAP) region of the North ... only when total exports between the Mid-Continent Area Power Pool (MAPP) and Manitoba ...

  3. O:\\EA-155.ORD

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    PJM is a security coordinator in the Mid-Atlantic Area Council (MAAP) region of the North ... only when total exports between the Mid-Continent Area Power Pool (MAPP) and Manitoba ...

  4. O:\\EA-169.ORD

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    PJM is a security coordinator in the Mid-Atlantic Area Council (MAAP) region of the North ... only when total exports between the Mid-Continent Area Power Pool (MAPP) and Manitoba ...

  5. O:\\EA-164.ORD

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    PJM is a security coordinator in the Mid-Atlantic Area Council (MAAP) region of the North ... only when total exports between the Mid-Continent Area Power Pool (MAPP) and Manitoba ...

  6. O:\\EA-157.ORD

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    PJM is a security coordinator in the Mid-Atlantic Area Council (MAAP) region of the North ... only when total exports between the Mid-Continent Area Power Pool (MAPP) and Manitoba ...

  7. O:\\EA-162.ORD

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    PJM is a security coordinator in the Mid-Atlantic Area Council (MAAP) region of the North ... only when total exports between the Mid-Continent Area Power Pool (MAPP) and Manitoba ...

  8. Table 8.12b Electric Noncoincident Peak Load and Capacity Margin...

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ... Data are for the United States excluding Alaska and Hawaii. 9Mid-Atlantic Area Council ... sum of components due to independent rounding. 11Mid-Continent Area Power Pool (MAPP). ...

  9. Vanguard Solar Inc | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    thin-film PV start up focused on the development of a low-cost flexible, thin-film PV material. Coordinates: 43.79863, -73.205035 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  10. Scandia Wind Southwest LLC | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    partners include; Alpha Wind Energy Aps of Denmark and Havgul clean energy AS of Norway. Coordinates: 44.457965, -88.545764 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  11. Energy4All | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    energy co-operatives in the UK as an integral part of our transition to a low carbon economy. Coordinates: 54.111089, -3.225847 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  12. The Climate Group | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    smart policies and technologies to cut global emissions and accelerate a low carbon economy. Coordinates: 51.506325, -0.127144 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  13. National Electric Transmission Study 2006 Western Interconnection Analysis

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Western Interconnection 2006 Congestion Assessment Study Prepared by the Western Congestion Analysis Task Force May 08, 2006 2 Western Interconnection 2006 Congestion Study - DOE Task 3 - 1. 2008 Modeling Study 2. 2015 Modeling Study - 2015 Planned Resource Development (IRPs and RPS) 3. W.I. Historical Path Usage Studies - 1999 thru 2005 - Physical congestion - Commercial congestion 3 WCATF Modeling Studies ABB Gridview Model * Model uses WECC 2005 L&R load forecast, modified with NPCC data

  14. operation_tbl2_October_2011M.xlsx

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Mean of Recovering 10.3 Billion Barrels 4. Production Schedules at Two Development Rates for the Statistical Mean of Recovering 10.3 Billion Barrels of Technically Recoverable Oil from the ANWR Coastal Plain of Alaska fig4.jpg (4109

    Next Update: October 2007 Table 3a . January Monthly Peak Hour Demand, Actual by North American Electric Reliability Council Region, 1996 through 2004 (Megawatts) Month Year Contiguous U.S. Eastern Power Grid Texas Power Grid Western Power Grid ECAR FRCC MAAC

  15. "January","NERC Regional Assesment Area"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    A.1. January monthly peak hour demand, by North American Electric Reliability Corporation Assesment Area, " "1996-2011 actual, 2012-2013 projected" "megawatts" "January","NERC Regional Assesment Area" ,,"Actual" ,,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011 "Eastern Interconnection","FRCC",39860,37127,27122,38581,37521,40258,39675,45033,35545,41247,34464,38352,41705,44945,53093,46086

  16. Electric Power Annual 2011

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Table 1. Net Energy for load, actual and projected by North American Electric Reliability Corporation Assessment Area, 1990-2011 actual, 2012-2016 projected thousands of megawatthours Interconnection NERC Regional Assesment Area 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E 2016E FRCC 142,502 146,903 147,464 153,468 159,861 169,021 173,377 175,557 188,384 188,598 196,561 200,134 211,116 219,021 220,335

  17. Electric Power Annual 2011

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    B Winter Net Internal Demand, Capacity Resources, and Capacity Margins by North American Electric Reliability Corporation Region, 2001-2011 Actual, 2012-2016 Projected megawatts and percent Interconnection NERC Regional Assesment Area 2001/ 2002 2002/ 2003 2003/ 2004 2004/ 2005 2005/ 2006 2006/ 2007 2007/ 2008 2008/ 2009 2009/ 2010 2010/ 2011 2011/ 2012 2012/ 2013E 2013/ 2014E 2014/ 2015E 2015/ 2016E 2016/ 2017E FRCC 39,699 42,001 36,229 41,449 42,493 45,993 46,093 45,042 51,703 45,954 39,924

  18. Next Update: November 2016

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    1. Net Energy for load, actual and projected by North American Electric Reliability Corporation Assessment Area, 1990-2014 actual, 2015-2016 projected thousands of megawatthours Interconnection NERC Regional Assesment Area 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E FRCC 142,502 146,903 147,464 153,468 159,861 169,021 173,377 175,557 188,384 188,598 196,561 200,134 211,116 219,021 220,335 226,544 230,115

  19. Next Update: November 2016

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    4.A. Summer net internal demand, capacity resources, and capacity margins by North American Electric Reliability Corporation Region 1999 through 2014 actual, 2015-2016 projected megawatts and percent Interconnection NERC Regional Assesment Area 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E FRCC 27,162 27,773 28,898 29,435 30,537 31,649 31,868 32,874 34,562 34,832 35,666 38,932 37,951 40,387 42,243 45,950

  20. Next Update: November 2016

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    4.B Winter net internal demand, capacity resources, and capacity margins by North American Electric Reliability Corporation Region, 2001/2002-2014/2015 actual, 2015-2017 projected megawatts and percent Interconnection NERC Regional Assesment Area 2001/ 2002 2002/ 2003 2003/ 2004 2004/ 2005 2005/ 2006 2006/ 2007 2007/ 2008 2008/ 2009 2009/ 2010 2010/ 2011 2011/ 2012 2012/ 2013 2013/ 2014 2014/ 2015 2015/ 2016E 2016/ 2017E FRCC 39,699 42,001 36,229 41,449 42,493 45,993 46,093 45,042 51,703 45,954

  1. Design, Fabrication, and Certification of Advanced Modular PV Power Systems Final Technical Progress Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Lambarski, T.; Minyard, G.

    1998-10-06

    This report describes the overall accomplishments and benefits of Solar Electric Specialties Co. (SES) under this Photovoltaic Manufacturing Technology (PVMaT) subcontract. SES addressed design issues related to their modular autonomous PV power supply (MAPPS) and a mobile photogenset. MAPPS investigations included gel-cell batteries mounted horizontally; redesign of the SES power supply; modified battery enclosure for increased safety and reduced cost; programmable, interactive battery charge controllers; and UL and FM listings. The photogenset systems incorporate generators, battery storage, and PV panels for a mobile power supply. The unit includes automatic oil-change systems for the propane generators, collapsible array mounts for the PV enclosure, and internal stowage of the arrays. Standardizing the products resulted in product lines of MAPPS and Photogensets that can be produced more economically and with shorter lead times, while increasing product quality and reliability. Product assembly and quality control have also been improved and streamlined with the development of standardized assembly processes and QC testing procedures. SES offers the UL-listed MAPPS at about the same price as its previous non-standardized, unlisted products.

  2. Design, fabrication, and certification of advanced modular PV power systems. Final technical progress report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Lambarski, T.; Minyard, G.

    1998-10-01

    Solar Electric Specialties Company (SES) has completed a two and a half year effort under the auspices of the US Department of Energy (DOE) PVMaT (Photovoltaic Manufacturing Technology) project. Under Phase 4A1 of the project for Product Driven System and Component Technology, the SES contract ``Design, Fabrication and Certification of Advanced Modular PV Power Systems`` had the goal to reduce installed system life cycle costs through development of certified (Underwriters Laboratories or other listing) and standardized prototype products for two of the product lines, MAPPS{trademark} (Modular Autonomous PV Power Supply) and Photogensets{trademark}. MAPPS are small DC systems consisting of Photovoltaic modules, batteries and a charge controller and producing up to about a thousand watt-hours per day. Photogensets are stand-alone AC systems incorporating a generator as backup for the PV in addition to a DC-AC inverter and battery charger. The program tasks for the two-year contract consisted of designing and fabricating prototypes of both a MAPPS and a Photogenset to meet agency listing requirements using modular concepts that would support development of families of products, submitting the prototypes for listing, and performing functionality testing at Sandia and NREL. Both prototypes were candidates for UL (Underwriters Laboratories) listing. The MAPPS was also a candidate for FM (Factory Mutual) approval for hazardous (incendiary gases) locations.

  3. EIS-0300: Minnesota Agri-Power Project: Biomass for Rural Development, Granite Falls, Minnesota

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EIS analyzes DOE and the Minnesota Environmental Quality Boards' [MEQB, a Minnesota State agency] decision to support a proposal by the Minnesota Valley Alfalfa Producers (MnVAP) to construct and operate a 75–103 megawatt biomass fueled gasifier and electric generating facility, known as the Minnesota Agri-Power Plant (MAPP), and associated transmission lines and alfalfa processing facilities.

  4. Preparation and characterization of composites based on poly(lactic acid) and CaCO{sub 3} nanofiller

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Moreno, Janaína Fernandes; Silva, Ana Lúcia N. da E-mail: ananazareth@ima.ufrj.br; Sousa, Ana Maria F. de

    2015-05-22

    In recent years, extensive studies have been conducted on the study of the poly(lactic acid) (PLA) properties, because of its being a typical biobased and biodegradable polymer, with good mechanical properties. However, its toughness and gas barrier properties are not satisfactory and can be improved by the addition of nanofillers, such as calcium carbonate (n-CaCO{sub 3}). The present work PLA composites with nano-sized precipitated calcium carbonate (n-NPCC) were prepared by melt extrusion. Thermal, mechanical and flow properties of the composites were evaluated by using a factorial design.The results showed that the addition of the nanofiller in the PLA matrix didn’t improve thethermal and mechanical properties of the matrix significantly. This behavior is probably due to the presence of the stearic acid that is coating on the n-NPCC particles, resulting in a weak polymer-particle interaction. Beyond this, it was also observed a decrease in MFI of the composites when nanofiller was added and at a higher screw speed.

  5. Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project Monitoring and Evaluation, Final Report For the Performance Period May 1, 2008 through April 30, 2009.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Sampson, Melvin R.

    2009-07-30

    The Yakima-Klickitat Fisheries Project (YKFP) is a joint project of the Yakama Nation (lead entity) and the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) and is sponsored in large part by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) with oversight and guidance from the Northwest Power and Conservation Council (NPCC). It is among the largest and most complex fisheries management projects in the Columbia Basin in terms of data collection and management, physical facilities, habitat enhancement and management, and experimental design and research on fisheries resources. Using principles of adaptive management, the YKFP is attempting to evaluate all stocks historically present in the Yakima subbasin and apply a combination of habitat restoration and hatchery supplementation or reintroduction, to restore the Yakima Subbasin ecosystem with sustainable and harvestable populations of salmon, steelhead and other at-risk species. The original impetus for the YKFP resulted from the landmark fishing disputes of the 1970s, the ensuing legal decisions in United States versus Washington and United States versus Oregon, and the region's realization that lost natural production needed to be mitigated in upriver areas where these losses primarily occurred. The YKFP was first identified in the NPCC's 1982 Fish and Wildlife Program (FWP) and supported in the U.S. v Oregon 1988 Columbia River Fish Management Plan (CRFMP). A draft Master Plan was presented to the NPCC in 1987 and the Preliminary Design Report was presented in 1990. In both circumstances, the NPCC instructed the Yakama Nation, WDFW and BPA to carry out planning functions that addressed uncertainties in regard to the adequacy of hatchery supplementation for meeting production objectives and limiting adverse ecological and genetic impacts. At the same time, the NPCC underscored the importance of using adaptive management principles to manage the direction of the Project. The 1994 FWP reiterated the importance of

  6. winter_capacity_2010.xls

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Table 4.B Winter Net Internal Demand, Capacity Resources, and Capacity Margins by North American Electric Reliability Corporation Region, 2001-2010 Actual, 2011-2015 Projected (Megawatts and Percent) Interconnection NERC Regional Assesment Area 2001/2002 2002/2003 2003/2004 2004/2005 2005/2006 2006/2007 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/ 2011 2011/2012E 2012/2013E 2013/2014E 2014/2015E 2015/2016E FRCC 39,699 42,001 36,229 41,449 42,493 45,993 46,093 45,042 51,703 45,954 44,196 44,750 45,350

  7. Electric Power Annual 2011

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    2. Noncoincident peak load, by North American Electric Reliability Corporation Assessment Area, 1990-2011 actual, 2012-2016 projected megawatts Interconnection NERC Regional Assesment Area 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E 2016E FRCC 27,266 28,818 30,601 32,823 32,904 34,524 35,444 35,375 38,730 37,493 37,194 39,062 40,696 40,475 42,383 46,396 45,751 46,676 44,836 46,550 45,722 44,968 45,613

  8. Electric Power Annual 2011

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    A. Summer net internal demand, capacity resources, and capacity margins by North American Electric Reliability Corporation Region 1999 through 2011 actual, 2012-2016 projected megawatts and percent Interconnection NERC Regional Assesment Area 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E 2016E FRCC 27,162 27,773 28,898 29,435 30,537 31,649 31,868 32,874 34,562 34,832 35,666 38,932 37,951 40,387 42,243 45,950

  9. Next Update: November 2016

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    2. Noncoincident peak load, by North American Electric Reliability Corporation Assessment Area, 1990-2014 actual, 2015-2016 projected megawatts Interconnection NERC Regional Assesment Area 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E FRCC 27,266 28,818 30,601 32,823 32,904 34,524 35,444 35,375 38,730 37,493 37,194 39,062 40,696 40,475 42,383 46,396 45,751 46,676 44,836 46,550 45,722 44,968 44,338 44,653

  10. Design, fabrication, and certification of advanced modular PV power systems. Annual technical progress report, 8 September 1995--7 September 1996

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Lambarski, T.; Minyard, G.

    1997-03-01

    This report summarizes the activities performed during the first year of a nominal 2-year effort by Solar Electric Specialties Company (SES) under the Photovoltaic Manufacturing Technology (PVMaT) project of the National Photovoltaic Program. The goal of the SES contract is to reduce the installed system life-cycle costs by developing certified and standardized prototype products for two SES product lines--MAPPS{trademark} and Photogenset{trademark}. The MAPPS (modular autonomous PV power supply) systems are used for DC applications up to about a thousand watt-hours. The Photogensets are hybrid PV/generator systems for AC applications. SES expects these products to provide the basis for future commercial product lines of standardized certified, packaged systems.

  11. Liquid Lithium Divertor and Scrape-Off-Layer Interactions on the National Spherical Torus Experiment: 2010 ? 2013 Progress Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    2013-08-27

    The implementation of the liquid Lithium Divertor (LLD) in NSTX presented a unique opportunity in plasma-material interactions studies. A high density Langmuir Probe (HDLP) array utilizing a dense pack of triple Langmuir probes was built at PPPL and the electronics designed and built by UIUC. It was shown that the HDLP array could be used to characterize the modification of the EEDF during lithium experiments on NSTX as well as characterize the transient particle loads during lithium experiments as a means to study ELMs. With NSTX being upgraded and a new divertor being installed, the HDLP array will not be used in NSTX-U. However UIUC is currently helping to develop two new systems for depositing lithium into NSTX-U, a Liquid Lithium Pellet Dripper (LLPD) for use with the granular injector for ELM mitigation and control studies as well as an Upward-Facing Lithium Evaporator (U-LITER) based on a flash evaporation system using an electron beam. Currently UIUC has Daniel Andruczyk Stationed at PPPL and is developing these systems as well as being involved in preparing the Materials Analysis Particle Probe (MAPP) for use in LTX and NSTX-U. To date the MAPP preparations have been completed. New sample holders were designed by UIUC?s Research Engineer at PPPL and manufactured at PPPL and installed. MAPP is currently being used on LTX to do calibration and initial studies. The LLPD has demonstrated that it can produce pellets. There is still some adjustments needed to control the frequency and particle size. Equipment for the U-LITER has arrived and initial test are being made of the electron beam and design of the U-LITER in progress. It is expected to have these ready for the first run campaign of NSTX-U.

  12. Resident Fish Stock above Chief Joseph and Grand Coulee Dams; 2002 Annual Report.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Connor, Jason M.; McLellan, Jason G.; Butler, Chris

    2003-09-01

    In 1980, the United States Congress enacted the Northwest Power Planning and Conservation Act (PL 96-501, 1980), which established the Northwest Power and Conservation Council (NPCC), formerly the Northwest Power Planning Council. The NPCC was directed by Congress to develop a regional Power Plan and also the Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program (FWP) to restore or replace losses of fish caused by construction and operation of hydroelectric dams in the Columbia River Basin. In developing the FWP, Congress specifically directed NPCC to solicit recommendations for measures to be included in the Program from the region's fish and wildlife agencies and Indian tribes. All measures adopted by the Council were also required to be consistent with the management objectives of the agencies and tribes [Section 4.(h)(6)(A)], the legal rights of Indian tribes in the region [Section 4.(h)(6)(D)] and be based upon and supported by the best available scientific knowledge [Section 4.(h)(6)(B)]. The Resident Fish Stock Status above Chief Joseph and Grand Coulee Dams Project, also known as the Joint Stock Assessment Project (JSAP) specifically addresses NPPC Council measure 10.8B.26 of the 1994 program. The Joint Stock Assessment Project is a management tool using ecosystem principles to manage artificial fish assemblages and native fish in altered environments existing in the Columbia River System above Chief Joseph and Grand Coulee Dams (Blocked Area). A three-phase approach of this project will enhance the fisheries resources of the Blocked Area by identifying data gaps, filling data gaps with research, and implementing management recommendations based on research results. The Blocked Area fisheries information is housed in a central location, allowing managers to view the entire system while making decisions, rather than basing management decisions on isolated portions of the system. The JSAP is designed and guided jointly by fisheries managers in the Blocked Area. The

  13. Resident Fish Stock Status above Chief Joseph and Grand Coulee Dams; 2002-2003 Annual Report.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Connor, Jason M.; McLellan, Jason G.; Butler, Chris

    2006-02-01

    In 1980, the United States Congress enacted the Northwest Power Planning and Conservation Act (PL 96-501, 1980), which established the Northwest Power and Conservation Council (NPCC), formerly the Northwest Power Planning Council. The NPCC was directed by Congress to develop a regional Power Plan and also the Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program (FWP) to restore or replace losses of fish caused by construction and operation of hydroelectric dams in the Columbia River Basin. In developing the FWP, Congress specifically directed NPCC to solicit recommendations for measures to be included in the Program from the region's fish and wildlife agencies and Indian tribes. All measures adopted by the Council were also required to be consistent with the management objectives of the agencies and tribes [Section 4.(h)(6)(A)], the legal rights of Indian tribes in the region [Section 4.(h)(6)(D)] and be based upon and supported by the best available scientific knowledge [Section 4.(h)(6)(B)]. The Resident Fish Stock Status above Chief Joseph and Grand Coulee Dams Project, also known as the Joint Stock Assessment Project (JSAP) specifically addresses NPPC Council measure 10.8B.26 of the 1994 program. The Joint Stock Assessment Project is a management tool using ecosystem principles to manage artificial and native fish assemblages in altered environments existing in the Columbia River System above Chief Joseph and Grand Coulee Dams (Blocked Area). A three-phase approach of this project will enhance the fisheries resources of the Blocked Area by identifying data gaps, filling data gaps with research, and implementing management recommendations based on research results. The Blocked Area fisheries information is housed in a central location, allowing managers to view the entire system while making decisions, rather than basing management decisions on isolated portions of the system. The JSAP is designed and guided jointly by fisheries managers in the Blocked Area. The

  14. Resident Fish Stock above Chief Joseph and Grand Coulee Dams; 2003-2004 Annual Report.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Connor, Jason M.; McLellan, Jason G.; Butler, Chris

    2005-11-01

    In 1980, the United States Congress enacted the Northwest Power Planning and Conservation Act (PL 96-501, 1980), which established the Northwest Power and Conservation Council (NPCC), formerly the Northwest Power Planning Council. The NPCC was directed by Congress to develop a regional Power Plan and also the Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program (FWP) to restore or replace losses of fish caused by construction and operation of hydroelectric dams in the Columbia River Basin. In developing the FWP, Congress specifically directed NPCC to solicit recommendations for measures to be included in the Program from the region's fish and wildlife agencies and Indian tribes. All measures adopted by the Council were also required to be consistent with the management objectives of the agencies and tribes [Section 4.(h)(6)(A)], the legal rights of Indian tribes in the region [Section 4.(h)(6)(D)] and be based upon and supported by the best available scientific knowledge [Section 4.(h)(6)(B)]. The Resident Fish Stock Status above Chief Joseph and Grand Coulee Dams Project, also known as the Joint Stock Assessment Project (JSAP) specifically addresses NPPC Council measure 10.8B.26 of the 1994 program. The Joint Stock Assessment Project is a management tool using ecosystem principles to manage artificial and native fish assemblages in altered environments existing in the Columbia River System above Chief Joseph and Grand Coulee Dams (Blocked Area). A three-phase approach of this project will enhance the fisheries resources of the Blocked Area by identifying data gaps, filling data gaps with research, and implementing management recommendations based on research results. The Blocked Area fisheries information is housed in a central location, allowing managers to view the entire system while making decisions, rather than basing management decisions on isolated portions of the system. The JSAP is designed and guided jointly by fisheries managers in the Blocked Area. The

  15. Use of polypropylene fibers coated with nano-silica particles into a cementitious mortar

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Coppola, B. Di Maio, L.; Scarfato, P.; Incarnato, L.

    2015-12-17

    Fiber reinforced cementitious composite (FRCC) materials have been widely used during last decades in order to overcome some of traditional cementitious materials issues: brittle behaviour, fire resistance, cover spalling, impact strength. For composite materials, fiber/matrix bond plays an important role because by increasing fiber/matrix interactions is possible to increase the behaviour of the entire material. In this study, in order to improve fiber to matrix adhesion, two chemical treatments of polypropylene fibers were investigated: alkaline hydrolysis and nano-silica sol-gel particles deposition. Treatmtents effect on fibers morphology and mechanical properties was investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and tensile tests. SEM investigations report the presence of spherical nano-silica particles on fiber surface, in the case of sol-gel process, while alkaline hydrolysis leads to an increase of fibers roughness. Both treatments have negligible influence on fibers mechanical properties confirming the possibility of their use in a cementitious mortar. Pullout tests were carried out considering three embedded length of fibers in mortar samples (10, 20 and 30 mm, respectively) showing an increase of pullout energy for treated fibers. The influence on fiber reinforced mortar mechanical properties was investigated by three-point flexural tests on prismatic specimens considering two fibers length (15 and 30 mm) and two fibers volume fractions (0.50 and 1.00 %). A general increase of flexural strength over the reference mix was achieved and an overall better behaviour is recognizable for mortars containing treated fibers.

  16. Evaluation of the Biological Effects of the Northwest Power Conservation Council's Mainstem Amendment on the Fisheries Upstream and Downstream of Libby Dam, Montana, 2007-2008 Annual Report.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Sylvester, Ryan; Stephens, Brian; Tohtz, Joel

    2009-04-03

    A new project began in 2005 to monitor the biological and physical effects of improved operations of Hungry Horse and Libby Dams, Montana, called for by the Northwest Power and Conservation Council (NPCC) Mainstem Amendment. This operating strategy was designed to benefit resident fish impacted by hydropower and flood control operations. Under the new operating guidelines, July through September reservoir drafts will be limited to 10 feet from full pool during the highest 80% of water supply years and 20 feet from full pool during the lowest 20% of water supply (drought) years. Limits were also established on how rapidly discharge from the dams can be increased or decreased depending on the season. The NPCC also directed the federal agencies that operate Libby and Hungry Horse Dams to implement a new flood control strategy (VARQ) and directed Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks to evaluate biological responses to this operating strategy. The Mainstem Amendment operating strategy has not been fully implemented at the Montana dams as of June 2008 but the strategy will be implemented in 2009. This report highlights the monitoring methods used to monitor the effects of the Mainstem Amendment operations on fishes, habitat, and aquatic invertebrates upstream and downstream of Libby Dam. We also present initial assessments of data and the effects of various operating strategies on physical and biological components of the systems upstream and downstream of Libby Dam. Annual electrofishing surveys in the Kootenai River and selected tributaries, along with gill net surveys in the reservoir, are being used to quantify the impacts of dam operations on fish populations upstream and downstream of Libby Dam. Scales and otoliths are being used to determine the age structure and growth of focal species. Annual population estimates and tagging experiments provide estimates of survival and growth in the mainstem Kootenai River and selected tributaries. Radio telemetry will be used to

  17. Mitigation for the Construction and Operation of Libby Dam, 2004-2005 Annual Report.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Dunnigan, James; DeShazer, Jay; Garrow, Larry (Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Libby, MT)

    2005-06-01

    ''Mitigation for the Construction and Operation of Libby Dam'' is part of the Northwest Power and Conservation Council's (NPCC) resident fish and wildlife program. The program was mandated by the Northwest Planning Act of 1980, and is responsible for mitigating damages to fish and wildlife caused by hydroelectric development in the Columbia River Basin. The objective of Phase I of the project (1983 through 1987) was to maintain or enhance the Libby Reservoir fishery by quantifying seasonal water levels and developing ecologically sound operational guidelines. The objective of Phase II of the project (1988 through 1996) was to determine the biological effects of reservoir operations combined with biotic changes associated with an aging reservoir. The objectives of Phase III of the project (1996 through present) are to implement habitat enhancement measures to mitigate for dam effects, to provide data for implementation of operational strategies that benefit resident fish, monitor reservoir and river conditions, and monitor mitigation projects for effectiveness. This project completes urgent and high priority mitigation actions as directed by the Kootenai Subbasin Plan. Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (MFWP) uses a combination of techniques to collect physical and biological data within the Kootenai River Basin. These data serve several purposes including: the development and refinement of models used in management of water resources and operation of Libby Dam; investigations into the limiting factors of native fish populations, gathering basic life history information, tracking trends in endangered and threatened species, and the assessment of restoration or management activities designed to restore native fishes and their habitats.

  18. Mitigation for the Construction and Operation of Libby Dam, 2003-2004 Annual Report.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Dunnigan, James; DeShazer, Jay; Garrow, Larry

    2004-06-01

    ''Mitigation for the Construction and Operation of Libby Dam'' is part of the Northwest Power and Conservation Council's (NPCC) resident fish and wildlife program. The program was mandated by the Northwest Planning Act of 1980, and is responsible for mitigating for damages to fish and wildlife caused by hydroelectric development in the Columbia River Basin. The objective of Phase I of the project (1983 through 1987) was to maintain or enhance the Libby Reservoir fishery by quantifying seasonal water levels and developing ecologically sound operational guidelines. The objective of Phase II of the project (1988 through 1996) was to determine the biological effects of reservoir operations combined with biotic changes associated with an aging reservoir. The objectives of Phase III of the project (1996 through present) are to implement habitat enhancement measures to mitigate for dam effects, to provide data for implementation of operational strategies that benefit resident fish, monitor reservoir and river conditions, and monitor mitigation projects for effectiveness. This project completes urgent and high priority mitigation actions as directed by the Kootenai Subbasin Plan. Montana FWP uses a combination of diverse techniques to collect a variety of physical and biological data within the Kootenai River Basin. These data serve several purposes including: the development and refinement of models used in management of water resources and operation of Libby Dam; investigations into the limiting factors of native fish populations, gathering basic life history information, tracking trends in endangered, threatened species, and the assessment of restoration or management activities intended to restore native fishes and their habitats.

  19. A novel approach in organic waste utilization through biochar addition in wood/polypropylene composites

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Das, Oisik; Sarmah, Ajit K.; Bhattacharyya, Debes

    2015-04-15

    Highlights: • Biochar made from waste wood was added with wood polypropylene composites. • 24% biochar gave the best mechanical properties. • 6% biochar had no effect on physico-mechanical properties of composites. • Coupling agent remained unreacted in composites having higher amount of biochar. - Abstract: In an attempt to concurrently address the issues related to landfill gas emission and utilization of organic wastes, a relatively novel idea is introduced to develop biocomposites where biochar made from pyrolysis of waste wood (Pinus radiata) is added with the same wood, plastic/polymer (polypropylene) and maleated anhydride polypropylene (MAPP). Experiments were conducted by manufacturing wood and polypropylene composites (WPCs) mixed with 6 wt%, 12 wt%, 18 wt%, 24 wt%, and 30 wt% biochar. Though 6 wt% addition had similar properties to that of the control (composite without biochar), increasing biochar content to 24 wt% improved the composite’s tensile/flexural strengths and moduli. The biochar, having high surface area due to fine particles and being highly carbonised, acted as reinforcing filler in the biocomposite. Composites having 12 wt% and 18 wt% of biochar were found to be the most ductile and thermally stable, respectively. This study demonstrates that, WPCs added with biochar has good potential to mitigate wastes while simultaneously producing biocomposites having properties that might be suited for various end applications.

  20. Addressing the challenges of plasma-surface interactions in NSTX-U*

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kaita, Robert; Abrams, Tyler; Jaworski, Michael; Lucia, Matthew; Nichols, Jacob H.; Skinner, Charles H.; Stotler, Daren; Allain, Jean Paul; Bedoya, Felipe

    2015-04-01

    The importance of conditioning plasma-facing components (PFCs) has long been recognized as a critical element in obtaining high-performance plasmas in magnetic confinement devices. Lithium coatings, for example, have been used for decades for conditioning PFCs. Since the initial studies on the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor, experiments on devices with different aspect ratios and magnetic geometries like the National Spherical Torus Experiment (NSTX) continue to show the relationship between lithium PFCs and good confinement and stability. While such results are promising, their empirical nature do not reflect the detailed relationship between PFCs and the dynamic conditions that occur in the tokamak environment. A first step developing an understanding such complexity will be taken in the upgrade to NSTX (NSTX-U) that is nearing completion. New measurement capabilities include the Materials Analysis and Particle Probe (MAPP) for in situ surface analysis of samples exposed to tokamak plasmas. The OEDGE suite of codes, for example, will provide a new way to model the underlying mechanisms for such material migration in NSTX-U. This will lead to a better understanding of how plasma-facing surfaces evolve during a shot, and how the composition of the plasma facing surface influences the discharge performance we observe. This paper will provide an overview of these capabilities, and highlight their importance for NSTX-U plans to transition from carbon to high-Z PFCs.

  1. A dual wavelength imaging system for plasma-surface interaction studies on the National Spherical Torus Experiment Upgrade

    DOE Public Access Gateway for Energy & Science Beta (PAGES Beta)

    Scotti, F.; Soukhanovskii, V. A.

    2015-12-09

    A two-channel spectral imaging system based on a charge injection device radiation-hardened intensified camera was built for studies of plasma-surface interactions on divertor plasma facing components in the National Spherical Torus Experiment Upgrade (NSTX-U) tokamak. By means of commercially available mechanically referenced optical components, the two-wavelength setup images the light from the plasma, relayed by a fiber optic bundle, at two different wavelengths side-by-side on the same detector. Remotely controlled filter wheels are used for narrow band pass and neutral density filters on each optical path allowing for simultaneous imaging of emission at wavelengths differing in brightness up to 3more » orders of magnitude. Applications on NSTX-U will include the measurement of impurity influxes in the lower divertor strike point region and the imaging of plasma-material interaction on the head of the surface analysis probe MAPP (Material Analysis and Particle Probe). Furthermore, the diagnostic setup and initial results from its application on the lithium tokamak experiment are presented.« less

  2. Addressing the challenges of plasma-surface interactions in NSTX-U*

    DOE Public Access Gateway for Energy & Science Beta (PAGES Beta)

    Kaita, Robert; Abrams, Tyler; Jaworski, Michael; Lucia, Matthew; Nichols, Jacob H.; Skinner, Charles H.; Stotler, Daren; Allain, Jean Paul; Bedoya, Felipe

    2015-04-01

    The importance of conditioning plasma-facing components (PFCs) has long been recognized as a critical element in obtaining high-performance plasmas in magnetic confinement devices. Lithium coatings, for example, have been used for decades for conditioning PFCs. Since the initial studies on the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor, experiments on devices with different aspect ratios and magnetic geometries like the National Spherical Torus Experiment (NSTX) continue to show the relationship between lithium PFCs and good confinement and stability. While such results are promising, their empirical nature do not reflect the detailed relationship between PFCs and the dynamic conditions that occur in the tokamakmore » environment. A first step developing an understanding such complexity will be taken in the upgrade to NSTX (NSTX-U) that is nearing completion. New measurement capabilities include the Materials Analysis and Particle Probe (MAPP) for in situ surface analysis of samples exposed to tokamak plasmas. The OEDGE suite of codes, for example, will provide a new way to model the underlying mechanisms for such material migration in NSTX-U. This will lead to a better understanding of how plasma-facing surfaces evolve during a shot, and how the composition of the plasma facing surface influences the discharge performance we observe. This paper will provide an overview of these capabilities, and highlight their importance for NSTX-U plans to transition from carbon to high-Z PFCs.« less

  3. Selected Area Fishery Evaluation Project Economic Analysis Study Final Report, Final Draft Revision 4: November 10, 2006.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Bonneville Power Administration; Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife; Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

    2006-11-01

    The purpose of this Study is to provide an economic review of current and proposed changes to the Select Area Fishery Evaluation Project (SAFE or Project). The Study results are the information requested in comments made on the Project by a joint review dated March 2005 by the Northwest Power and Conservation Council (NPCC) Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP) and Independent Economic Analysis Board (IEAB). North et al. (2006) addressed technical questions about operations and plans, and this report contains the response information for comments concerning Project economics. This report can be considered an economic feasibility review meeting guidelines for cost-effective analysis developed by the IEAB (2003). It also contains other economic measurement descriptions to illustrate the economic effects of SAFE. The SAFE is an expansion of a hatchery project (locally called the Clatsop Economic Development Council Fisheries Project or CEDC) started in 1977 that released an early run coho (COH) stock into the Youngs River. The Youngs River entrance to the Columbia River at River Mile 12 is called Youngs Bay, which is located near Astoria, Oregon. The purpose of the hatchery project was to provide increased fishing opportunities for the in-river commercial fishing gillnet fleet. Instead of just releasing fish at the hatchery, a small scale net pen acclimation project in Youngs Bay was tried in 1987. Hirose et al. (1998) found that 1991-1992 COH broodstock over-wintered at the net pens had double the smolt-to-adult return rate (SAR) of traditional hatchery release, less than one percent stray rates, and 99 percent fishery harvests. It was surmised that smolts from other Columbia River hatcheries could be hauled to the net pens for acclimation and release to take advantage of the SAR's and fishing rates. Proposals were tendered to Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and other agencies to fund the expansion for using other hatcheries smolts and other off

  4. Libby Mitigation Program, 2007 Annual Progress Report: Mitigation for the Construction and Operation of Libby Dam.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Dunnigan, James; DeShazer, J.; Garrow, L.

    2009-05-26

    basin streams and lakes. 'Mitigation for the Construction and Operation of Libby Dam' is part of the Northwest Power and Conservation Council's (NPCC) resident fish and wildlife program. The program was mandated by the Northwest Planning Act of 1980, and is responsible for mitigating damages to fish and wildlife caused by hydroelectric development in the Columbia River Basin. The objective of Phase I of the project (1983 through 1987) was to maintain or enhance the Libby Reservoir fishery by quantifying seasonal water levels and developing ecologically sound operational guidelines. The objective of Phase II of the project (1988 through 1996) was to determine the biological effects of reservoir operations combined with biotic changes associated with an aging reservoir. The objectives of Phase III of the project (1996 through present) are to implement habitat enhancement measures to mitigate for dam effects, to provide data for implementation of operational strategies that benefit resident fish, monitor reservoir and river conditions, and monitor mitigation projects for effectiveness. This project completes urgent and high priority mitigation actions as directed by the Kootenai Subbasin Plan.

  5. The Umatilla Basin Natural Production Monitoring and Evaluation Project, 2008 Annual Progress Report.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Contor, Craig R.; Harris, Robin; King, Marty

    2009-06-10

    The Umatilla Basin Natural Production Monitoring and Evaluation Project (UBNPMEP) is funded by Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) as directed by section 4(h) of the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act of 1980 (P.L.96-501). This project is in accordance with and pursuant to measures 4.2A, 4.3C.1, 7.1A.2, 7.1C.3, 7.1C.4 and 7.1D.2 of the Northwest Power Planning Council's (NPPC) Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program (NPPC 1994). Work was conducted by the Fisheries Program of the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR). The UBNPMEP is coordinated with two Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) research projects that also monitor and evaluate the success of the Umatilla Fisheries Restoration Plan. This project deals with the natural production component of the plan, and the ODFW projects evaluate hatchery operations (project No. 1990-005-00, Umatilla Hatchery M & E) and smolt outmigration (project No. 1989-024-01, Evaluation of Juvenile Salmonid Outmigration and Survival in the Lower Umatilla River). Collectively these three projects monitor and evaluate natural and hatchery salmonid production in the Umatilla River Basin. The need for natural production monitoring has been identified in multiple planning documents including Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish-Wit Volume I, 5b-13 (CRITFC 1996), the Umatilla Hatchery Master Plan (CTUIR & ODFW 1990), the Umatilla Basin Annual Operation Plan, the Umatilla Subbasin Summary (CTUIR & ODFW 2001), the Subbasin Plan (CTUIR & ODFW 2004), and the Comprehensive Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation Plan (CTUIR and ODFW 2006). Natural production monitoring and evaluation is also consistent with Section III, Basinwide Provisions, Strategy 9 of the 2000 Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program (NPPC 1994, NPCC 2004). The Umatilla Basin M&E plan developed along with efforts to restore natural populations of spring and fall Chinook salmon, (Oncorhynchus tshawytsha), coho

  6. Spinning Reserve From Responsive Loads

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kirby, B.J.

    2003-04-08

    Responsive load is the most underutilized reliability resource available to the power system today. It is currently not used at all to provide spinning reserve. Historically there were good reasons for this, but recent technological advances in communications and controls have provided new capabilities and eliminated many of the old obstacles. North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC), Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), Northeast Power Coordinating Council (NPCC), New York State Reliability Council (NYSRC), and New York Independent System Operator (NYISO) rules are beginning to recognize these changes and are starting to encourage responsive load provision of reliability services. The Carrier ComfortChoice responsive thermostats provide an example of these technological advances. This is a technology aimed at reducing summer peak demand through central control of residential and small commercial air-conditioning loads. It is being utilized by Long Island Power Authority (LIPA), Consolidated Edison (ConEd), Southern California Edison (SCE), and San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E). The technology is capable of delivering even greater response in the faster spinning reserve time frame (while still providing peak reduction). Analysis of demand reduction testing results from LIPA during the summer of 2002 provides evidence to back up this claim. It also demonstrates that loads are different from generators and that the conventional wisdom, which advocates for starting with large loads as better ancillary service providers, is flawed. The tempting approach of incrementally adapting ancillary service requirements, which were established when generators were the only available resources, will not work. While it is easier for most generators to provide replacement power and non-spinning reserve (the slower response services) than it is to supply spinning reserve (the fastest service), the opposite is true for many loads. Also, there is more financial

  7. Collaborative Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) - Year 5 : Annual Report for FY 2008.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Marmorek, David R.; Porter, Marc; Pickard, Darcy; Wieckowski, Katherine

    2008-11-19

    The Collaborative Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) is a coordinated effort to improve the quality, consistency, and focus of fish population and habitat data to answer key monitoring and evaluation questions relevant to major decisions in the Columbia River Basin. CSMEP was initiated by the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority (CBFWA) in October 2003. The project is funded by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) through the Northwest Power and Conservation Council's Fish and Wildlife Program (NPCC). CSMEP is a major effort of the federal state and Tribal fish and wildlife managers to develop regionally integrated monitoring and evaluation (M&E) across the Columbia River Basin. CSMEP has focused its work on five monitoring domains: status and trends monitoring of populations and action effectiveness monitoring of habitat, harvest, hatcheries, and the hydrosystem. CSMEP's specific goals are to: (1) interact with federal, state and tribal programmatic and technical entities responsible for M&E of fish and wildlife, to ensure that work plans developed and executed under this project are well integrated with ongoing work by these entities; (2) document, integrate, and make available existing monitoring data on listed salmon, steelhead, bull trout and other fish species of concern; (3) critically assess strengths and weaknesses of these data for answering key monitoring questions; and (4) collaboratively design, implement and evaluate improved M&E methods with other programmatic entities in the Pacific Northwest. During FY2008 CSMEP biologists continued their reviews of the strengths and weaknesses (S&W) of existing subbasin inventory data for addressing monitoring questions about population status and trends at different spatial and temporal scales. Work was focused on Lower Columbia Chinook and steelhead, Snake River fall Chinook, Upper Columbia Spring Chinook and steelhead, and Middle Columbia River Chinook and steelhead. These FY2008

  8. Columbia River Hatchery Reform System-Wide Report.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Warren, Dan

    2009-04-16

    Puget Sound/Coastal Washington hatchery programs, followed by the development in 2005 of a suite of analytical tools to support application of the principles (all reports and tools are available at www.hatcheryreform.us). In 2005, Congress directed the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-Fisheries (NOAA Fisheries) to replicate the Puget Sound and Coastal Washington Hatchery Reform Project in the Columbia River Basin. The HSRG was expanded to 14 members to include individuals with specific knowledge about the Columbia River salmon and steelhead populations. This second phase was initially envisioned as a one-year review, with emphasis on the Lower Columbia River hatchery programs. It became clear however, that the Columbia River Basin needed to be viewed as an inter-connected ecosystem in order for the review to be useful. The project scope was subsequently expanded to include the entire Basin, with funding for a second year provided by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) under the auspices of the Northwest Power and Conservation Council's (NPCC) Fish and Wildlife Program. The objective of the HSRG's Columbia River Basin review was to change the focus of the Columbia River hatchery system. In the past, these hatchery programs have been aimed at supplying adequate numbers of fish for harvest as mitigation primarily for hydropower development in the Basin. A new, ecosystem-based approach is founded on the idea that harvest goals are sustainable only if they are compatible with conservation goals. The challenge before the HSRG was to determine whether or not conservation and harvest goals could be met by fishery managers and, if so, how. The HSRG determined that in order to address these twin goals, both hatchery and harvest reforms are necessary. The HSRG approach represents an important change of direction in managing hatcheries in the region. It provides a clear demonstration that current hatchery programs can indeed be redirected to better meet both

  9. Comparative Survival Study (CSS) of PIT-Tagged Spring/Summer Chinook and Summer Steelhead : 2008 Annual Report.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Comparative Survival Study Oversight Committee and Fish Passage Center

    2008-12-02

    comments of the most recent regional technical review conducted by the Independent Scientific Advisory Board and Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISAB and ISRP 2007). This report completes the 3-salt returns from migration years 2004 for wild and hatchery Chinook and steelhead (all returns are to Lower Granite Dam). For wild and hatchery Chinook, this report also provides 3-salt returns from migration year 2005 and 2-salt returns from migration year 2006 through a cutoff date of August 13, 2008. For wild and hatchery steelhead, it provides completed 2-salt returns for wild and hatchery steelhead that outmigrated in 2005 (any 3-salt returns of PIT-tagged steelhead are few, but will occur after July 1, 2008). All of the Chinook salmon evaluated in the CSS study exhibit a stream-type life history. All study fish used in this report were uniquely identifiable based on a PIT-tag implanted in the body cavity during (or before) the smolt life stage and retained through their return as adults. These tagged fish can then be detected as juveniles and adults at several locations of the Snake and Columbia rivers. Reductions in the number of individuals detected as the tagged fish grow older provide estimates of survival. This allows comparisons of survival over different life stages between fish with different experiences in the hydrosystem (e.g. transportation vs. in-river migrants and migration through various numbers of dams) as illustrated in Figure 1.1. The CSS is a long term study within the Northwest Power and Conservation Council's Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program (NPCC FWP) and is funded by Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Study design and analyses are conducted through a CSS Oversight Committee with representation from Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC), Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG), Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). The