Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fleet-wide cafe compliance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Fleet-wide Prognostics and Health Management Applications Research  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Fleet-Wide Prognostic and Health Management (FW-PHM) Suite of software is a multi-user, web-based software application that users access from their desktop computer through a standard web browser, such as Internet Explorer 7 or above. The installed FW-PHM Suite is a three-tiered collection of web sites, web services and Oracle databases. The web sites provide the user interface. The Oracle databases contain the information needed by the software to perform the asset prognostic and health ...

2012-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

2

Instrumentation and Control Strategies for Plant-Wide and Fleet-Wide Cost Reduction  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A more recent product is now available that contains this report, along with additional presentation materials to facilitate its use. See Product 1018109. This report provides guidance arising from the EPRI initiative on IC Strategies for Plant-Wide and Fleet-Wide Cost Reduction. The document describes a wide range of options while emphasizing integrated modernization across the plant or fleet. Coordinated improvements to shared communications and computing infrastructure, plant processes, and organizat...

2007-10-29T23:59:59.000Z

3

Fleet-Wide Prognostic and Health Management Suite: Beta Testing Results  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Fleet-Wide Prognostic and Health Management software suite (FW-PHM) is an integrated suite of web-based diagnostic and prognostic tools and databases specifically developed for the Electric Power Research Institute by Expert Microsystems for use in the commercial power industry (both nuclear and fossil fuel). FW-PHM serves as an integrated health management framework, managing the functionality needed for a complete implementation of automated diagnostics and prognostics. The open-architecture ...

2013-05-16T23:59:59.000Z

4

Instrumentation and Control Strategies for Plant-Wide and Fleet-Wide Cost Reduction: Utility Application Guideline  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This CD provides guidance from the EPRI initiative on IC Strategies for Plant-Wide and Fleet-Wide Cost Reduction. Included on the CD are EPRI Technical Report 1015087, Instrumentation and Control Strategies for Plant-Wide and Fleet-Wide Cost Reduction: Utility Application Guideline, published October 2007, and two multimedia briefings. The report and briefings describe a wide range of options while emphasizing integrated modernization across the plant or fleet. Coordinated improvements to shared communi...

2008-09-03T23:59:59.000Z

5

Science Cafe  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Cafés Cafés Science Cafe November 1, 2013 Print Tuesday, 24 September 2013 15:00 Friday, November 1@ 12 noon in USB 15-253 jackson Exposing the Trade Secrets of Ancient Roman Engineers: Nano-Structure and Material Properties of Al-tobermorite in 2000-Year-Old Seawater Harbor Concrete Marie Jackson, UC Berkeley, Beamlines 5.3.2, 12.2.2,12.3.2 DNA Labelled with Gold Greg Hura, Physical Biosciences Division, Beamline 12.3.1 robin Pseudo-Single-Bunch Operation with Adjustable Frequency - A New Operation Mode for the ALS Dave Robin, AFRD August 29, 2013 Print Thursday, 11 April 2013 08:37 Date-Change: Thursday, August 29 @ 12 noon in USB 15-253 beavers Under Pressure: Why Diamonds Are a Crystallographer's Best Friend! Christine Beavers, Experimental Systems Group, Beamline 11.3.1

6

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) - Sector  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

average fleet-wide CAFE compliance levels (miles per gallon) for passenger cars and light-duty trucks, model years 2017-2025 Model year Passenger cars Light-duty trucks...

7

Sipping Science in a Caf\\'e  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We present here the European project SciCaf\\'e - networking of science caf\\'es in Europe and neighboring countries, and the contributions of the CSDC-Caff\\`e Scienza partner in Florence, Itay.

Bagnoli, Franco

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

8

CAFE Standards (released in AEO2010)  

Reports and Publications (EIA)

Pursuant to the Presidents announcement of a National Fuel Efficiency Policy, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the EPA have promulgated nationally coordinated standards for tailpipe CO2-equivalent emissions and fuel economy for light-duty vehicles (LDVs) [16], which includes both passenger cars and light-duty trucks. In the joint rulemaking, EPA is enacting CO2-equivalent emissions standards under the Clean Air Act (CAA), and NHTSA is enacting companion CAFE standards under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended by EISA2007.

Information Center

2010-05-11T23:59:59.000Z

9

New NHTSA CAFE Standards (released in AEO2009)  

Reports and Publications (EIA)

EISA2007 requires the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to raise the CAFE standards for passenger cars and light trucks to ensure that the average tested fuel economy of the combined fleet of all new passenger cars and light trucks sold in the United States in model year (MY) 2020 equals or exceeds 35 mpg, 34 percent above the current fleet average of 26.4 mpg. Pursuant to this legislation, NHTSA recently proposed revised CAFE standards that substantially increase the minimum fuel economy requirements for passenger cars and light trucks for MY 2011 through MY 2015.

Information Center

2009-03-31T23:59:59.000Z

10

Vehicle Technologies Office: Fact #571: May 18, 2009 Light Truck CAFE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1: May 18, 2009 1: May 18, 2009 Light Truck CAFE Standards - 2006 Reformation to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: Fact #571: May 18, 2009 Light Truck CAFE Standards - 2006 Reformation on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: Fact #571: May 18, 2009 Light Truck CAFE Standards - 2006 Reformation on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: Fact #571: May 18, 2009 Light Truck CAFE Standards - 2006 Reformation on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: Fact #571: May 18, 2009 Light Truck CAFE Standards - 2006 Reformation on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: Fact #571: May 18, 2009 Light Truck CAFE Standards - 2006 Reformation on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: Fact #571: May 18, 2009 Light Truck CAFE Standards - 2006 Reformation on

11

Computing compliance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Inquisitive semantics (cf. Groenendijk, 2008) provides a formal framework for reasoning about information exchange. The central logical notion that the semantics gives rise to is compliance. This paper presents an algorithm that computes the set of compliant ...

Ivano Ciardelli; Irma Cornelisse; Jeroen Groenendijk; Floris Roelofsen

2009-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

12

DOE NEPA Compliance Officers  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

NEPA Compliance Officers are listed first for Program Offices, then Power Marketing Administrations, then Field Offices.

13

Single crystal growth and superconductivity of Ca(Fe1-xCox)2As2  

SciTech Connect

We report the single crystal growth of Ca(Fe1-xCox)2As2 (0 <= x <= 0.082) from Sn flux. The temperature-composition phase diagram is mapped out based on the magnetic susceptibility and electrical transport measurements. Phase diagram of Ca(Fe1-xCox)2As2 is qualitatively different from those of Sr and Ba, it could be due to both the charge doping and structural tuning effects associated with Co substitution.

Hu, Rongwei; Ran, Sheng; Budko, Serguei; Straszheim, Warren E.; Canfield, Paul C.

2012-05-18T23:59:59.000Z

14

Compliance Order on Consent  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Laws » Laws » Compliance Order on Consent Compliance Order on Consent The Compliance Order on Consent provides the requirements for environmental cleanup of hazardous constituents for LANL. Contact Environmental Communication & Public Involvement P.O. Box 1663 MS M996 Los Alamos, NM 87545 (505) 667-0216 Email What is the Compliance Order on Consent? The Compliance Order on Consent between the State of New Mexico Environment Department and the United States Department of Energy and Los Alamos National Laboratory provides for specified compliance requirements for all of the solid waste management units, areas of concern, canyons, and watershed aggregates included in the Order. Compliance Order on Consent documents LANL documents submitted under the Compliance Order on Consent are

15

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

n tal Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope oc:c:urs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and contact the Technical...

16

Alabama Compliance Implementation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Alabama Alabama Compliance Implementation and Evaluation (CIE) Guide BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM COMPLIANCE IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION (CIE) GUIDE 2 This Guide is designed to assist state and local code jurisdictions in achieving statewide compliance with the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) for residential buildings and ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007 for commercial buildings. COMPLIANCE IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION (CIE) GUIDE 3 Alabama WHAT'S INSIDE CIE Guide Overview-Flow Diagram ........................................................................................................................... 5 PART 1: Guide Overview .................................................................................................................................................

17

Environmental Compliance Guide  

SciTech Connect

Volume II supplements Vol. I in providing procedures, relative timing, and details to assist in achieving compliance with Federal environmental requirements. (PSB)

None

1981-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

18

NEPA Compliance Officer  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Compliance Officer Compliance Officer Award #: EE 000 0784 Recipient: County of Escambia ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) MC Blanchard Judicial Center B5.1 Historic Preservation Clause and Old Courthouse Block Waste Stream Clause Office Complex EEIP Road Prison Geothermal Earth Coupled HVAC Upgrade A9, All Allowable Activities: Information gathering, data collection, reporting, and preliminary design. Prohibited Activities: Implementation of final design, construction, and operation tasks for this project should be conditioned pending further NEPA review. Landfill Gas Extraction and Control System A9, All Allowable Activities: Information gathering,

19

II. GENERAL COMPLIANCE SUPPLEMENT INTRODUCTION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Rather than repeat these compliance requirements, audit objectives, and suggested audit procedures for each program, they are provided once in this part. For each program in this Compliance Supplement (this Supplement), the program-specific compliance guidance section (Part III of this guidance) contains additional information about the compliance requirements that arise from laws and regulations applicable to each program, including the requirements specific to each program that should be tested using the guidance in this part. Compliance Requirements, Audit Objectives, and Suggested Audit Procedures At the end of this General Compliance Supplement is a matrix that outlines the compliance requirements, including special tests and provisions, that are applicable to programs performed under

20

Compliance Agreements | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Compliance » Compliance Compliance » Compliance Agreements Compliance Agreements This photo shows the Savannah River Site’s Heavy Water Components Test Reactor during decommissioning. This photo shows the Savannah River Site's Heavy Water Components Test Reactor during decommissioning. Compliance agreements illustrate and help support the development of effective compliance approaches and strategies, and can assist in promoting greater cooperation, coordination, and consistency with other EM offices, Departmental organizations, and State agencies. Please click the site or location name to view a listing of the associated agreements and summaries. Idaho Oak Ridge Paducah Portsmouth Richland/Office of River Protection Savannah River Closure Sites NNSA Sites West Valley Demonstration Project

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fleet-wide cafe compliance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

DOE NEPA Compliance Officers  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA Compliance Officers NEPA Compliance Officers NEPA Compliance Officers are listed first for Program Offices, then Power Marketing Administrations, then Field Offices. Please send updates to yardena.mansoor@hq.doe.gov Oct 04, 2013 Forrestal (FORS) Addresses: Germantown (GTN) Addresses: 1000 Independence Ave SW 1000 Independence Ave SW Washington, DC 20585 Washington, DC 20585-1290 . Use for U.S. Postal Service mail. 19901 Germantown Road Germantown, MD 20874-1290 Use for EXPRESS DELIVERY (e.g. Federal Express, UPS). NAME, OFFICE, E-MAIL FAX ADDRESS PHONE william.bierbower@hq.doe.gov Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy 202-287-6585 FORS AR-1 20585 ARPA-E William Bierbower lori.gray@go.doe.gov Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office 720-356-1568 720-356-1350 Department of Energy

22

Coach Compliance Form  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Coach Compliance Form Coach Compliance Form My team is participating in the Department of Energy's Lithium-Ion Battery Car Competition as part of the National Science Bowl ® . I have reviewed the following documents with the participating students: o Safety Hazards of Batteries o Material Safety Data Sheet - Lithium Polymer Battery o Electric Battery Car Competition Rules ______________________________ ______________ Coach Signature Date Name of School: ____________________________________________ Name of Coach (Please Print): ________________________________ Coach's Email Address: ______________________________________ Please sign this form and either mail, fax or e-mail a pdf to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory: National Renewable Energy Laboratory

23

2004 WIPP Compliance Recertification Application  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2004 WIPP Compliance Recertification Application DOEWIPP 04-3231 March 2004 Content of the CRA As required by Title 40 CFR, Parts 191 and 194, the 2004 Compliance Recertification...

24

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) - Sector  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

average fleet-wide CAFE compliane levels (miles per gallon) for passenger cars and light-duty tracks, model years 2017-2025, based on the model year 2010 baseline fleet Model...

25

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Project lnfonnation Project Title: C-EAG. Maintenance I grading of existing roads Date: 8/4/2011 and road drainages (barrow ditches): ex 81.3 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Overview 1. Brief project description [include C-EA 6. Maintenance I grading of existing roads and road drai nages anything that could impact the (barrow ditches) : ex 81.3 environment] Existing roads defined as per May 2010 Aerial Photos. (Changing out culverts, grading I modifying embankments, etc., that has potential to impact wetlands, requires a NCS.) The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

26

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Project lnfonnation Project Title: New Drilling Location in Section 29 Date: 12-10-2009 DOE Code: 6730.020.78002 Contractor Code: 8067-371 Project Lead: Mark Duletsky Project Overview The project will involve excavating 3-4 backhoe pits to a depth of about 8 feet to observe soil characteristics 1. What are the environmental impacts? in the vicinity of our planned reserve pit excavation area. 2. What is the legal location? NE 1/4, SE 1/4, Sec. 29. T39N. R78W. Natrona County, Wyoming 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used 1 day if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? Backhoe The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

27

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE (EC)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE (EC) OBJECTIVE EC.1: LANL has established and implemented an Environmental Compliance program to ensure safe accomplishment of work and operations within the requirements of the BIO, TSRs, SER, and regulatory permits for WCRR Facility activities. Sufficient numbers of qualified personnel, as well as adequate facilities and equipment, are available to support WCRRF operations. (CRs 1, 4, 6, 7, 9) CRITERIA 1. WCRRF has implemented the requirements for hazardous materials and waste management programs, as described in the WCRRF BIO and TSRs (WCRRF TSRs 5.6.9 and 5.10.2). 2. Environmental permits required for WCRR operations have been met. Processes are in place to ensure that these requirements are maintained. Environmental regulations include Resource

28

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Project l nfonnation Project Title: Reclamation ofT-2-14 Date: 11/2412009 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview We will be removing old piping from the treater@ T-2-14. We will also remove the berm and grade and 1. What are the environmental impacts? reclamate location. The duration of this project will be approx. 2 days. Equipment that will be used is as follows backhoe. dumptruck, blade,and a tiller so we can seed with native grasses. 2. What is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used if any (woO< over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? The table below Is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

29

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Replace electrical line from well to power pole Date: 3/10/2010 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Mike Preston Project Overview No impact to the environment. 1. What are the environmental impacts? Dig up old electrical line from pumping unit on 61-S-34 to power pole east of well , {approximately 75 feet 2. What is the legal location? from unit) and replace with new line. 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used 1 day if any (work over rig , drilling rig , etc.)? Electrician, ditch witch and operator for equipment The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

30

Residential Building Code Compliance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 6 Residential Building Code Compliance: Recent Findings and Implications Energy use in residential buildings in the U.S. is significant-about 20% of primary energy use. While several approaches reduce energy use such as appliance standards and utility programs, enforcing state building energy codes is one of the most promising. However, one of the challenges is to understand the rate of compliance within the building community. Utility companies typically use these codes as the baseline for providing incentives to builders participating in utility-sponsored residential new construction (RNC) programs. However, because builders may construct homes that fail to meet energy codes, energy use in the actual baseline is higher than would be expected if all buildings complied with the code. Also,

31

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Restoration of 77 -13-SX-3 Date: 2-8-1 0 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview We will be restoring 77-SX-3 per procedure. 1. What are the environmental impacts? The duration of this project will be 3-4 days. 2. What is the leg al location? 3. What is the duration of the project? The equipment to be used will be Backhoe, welder, tiller dump truck. 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig , drilling rig , We will take oil contaminated dirt to the Eastside landfarm and backfill with d ean fill dirt from sec. 20. etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

32

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Project lnfonnation Project Title: e-EA5. Reclamation of well sites Date: 8/4/2011 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Overview e-EA 5. Reclamation of wellsites : ex 81.3 and ex 86.1 1. Brief project description [include anything that could impact the Small-scale, short-term cleanup actions including excavation and environment] consolidation of contaminated soils, removal of underground piping, removal of rig anchors or T-bars, drainage control , transport and backfilling of clean soil I fill dirt, and reseeding . The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

33

Checking Security Policy Compliance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Ensuring compliance of organizations to federal regulations is a growing concern. This paper presents a framework and methods to verify whether an implemented low-level security policy is compliant to a high-level security policy. Our compliance checking framework is based on organizational and security metadata to support refinement of high-level concepts to implementation specific instances. Our work uses the results of refinement calculus to express valid refinement patterns and their properties. Intuitively, a low-level security policy is compliant to a high-level security policy if there is a valid refinement path from the high-level security policy to the low-level security policy. Our model is capable of detecting violations of security policies, failures to meet obligations, and capability and modal conflicts.

Gowadia, Vaibhav; Kudo, Michiharu

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

34

Data:2abaedfb-9908-4521-aa83-6cafe753dabb | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

abaedfb-9908-4521-aa83-6cafe753dabb abaedfb-9908-4521-aa83-6cafe753dabb No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Jacksonville Electric Authority Effective date: 2012/01/01 End date if known: Rate name: GSLD General Service Large Demand - Transmission Sector: Commercial Description: To any customer where the measured monthly billing demand is 1000 kW or more four months out of the twelve consecutive monthly billing periods ending with the current billing period. Also at the option of the customer, to any customer with demands of less than 1000 kW, but more than 699 kW, who agrees to pay for service under this rate schedule for a minimum initial term of twelve months. Resale of energy purchased under this rate schedule is not permitted.

35

Compliance Certification Application  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

40 CFR Part 191 40 CFR Part 191 Compliance Certification Application for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Appendix PIC United States Department of Energy Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Carlsbad Area Office Carlsbad, New Mexico Passive Institutional Controls Conceptual Design Report PASSIVE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT REVISION 0 MAY 14, 1996 1 C PASSIVE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS DESIGN REPORT REVISION 0 PASSIVE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT MAY 1 4 . 1 9 9 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 A . Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 B . Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 C . Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 I1 . SITE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 I11 . DESIGN REQUIREMENTS/CRITERIA . . . . . . . . . . 17 IV . MESSAGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

36

Christina Bigelow Compliance Counsel  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Christina Bigelow Christina Bigelow Compliance Counsel Direct Dial: 317-249-5132 E-mail: cbigelow@misoenergy.org November 6, 2013 Mr. Stan Kaplan Mr. William Booth U.S. Energy Information Administration 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 VIA EMAIL RE: Form EIA-930 Hourly and Daily Balancing Authority Operations Report Revisions Dear Mssrs. Booth and Kaplan: On behalf of the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc 1 . ("MISO"), I want to extend our appreciation for your time and consideration of the input of the Independent System Operators and Regional Transmission Organizations ("ISOs/RTOs") regarding the proposal to collect additional Balancing Authority ("BA") operations information from all "Balancing

37

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY # 350 8 Revised 8/2/10 mjt Attachment 1 Written by Dan Smallwood Production Enhancement Project-5 T-2-34 to T-1-33 MIT all wells in this area to determine which are producing wells. There are 15 wells shut in this area because of no tank or shipping line. According to the old test sheet these wells make 24bbls oil and 120bbls of water. Two of these wells have leaks in the flow lines that will be fixed. One is 33-S-34 which could be run to 34-AX-34, about 400' .6 bbl/pd and the other is 35 shx 34 which could be run to 35-AX-34 which is about 200'.5bbl/pd. 42-AX-34 could be ran to 32-AX-34 and then to 33-SX-34 to 34-AX-34. There are two manifolds at T-2-34, one with 10 wells and the other with 12. None of the flow lines have valves or checks in the lines. I propose we flush, disconnect, and plug all wells that

38

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Project Information Project Title: Survey Centralizer Design Date: 2-10-2010 DOE Code: 6730.020.71091 Contractor Code: 8067-762 Project Lead: Frank Ingham Project Overview 1. What are the environmental No environmental impacts. impacts? Run a logging tool through existing wells at : 2. What is the /ega/location? 67-LBT-3, SW SE sec 3, T38N , R78W 86-1 -X-10 , NE SE Sec 10, T38N , R78W 3. What is the duration of the project? 22-2-X-10H , NW NW Sec 10, T38N , R78W 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig , drilling rig, 4 Days etc.)? Stinger truck or crane . The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

39

Compliance Evaluation | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

as the Saltstone PA, is acceptable. Compliance Evaluation More Documents & Publications DOE Order 435.1 Performance Assessment Savannah River Site 2009 Performance Assessment for...

40

Motor Vehicle Parts Compliance Requirements  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... The OVSC compliance testing program is a strong incentive for manufacturers of motor vehicles and items of motor vehicle equipment to ...

2012-09-24T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fleet-wide cafe compliance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

FAQS Reference Guide Environmental Compliance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This reference guide addresses the competency statements in the June 2011 edition of DOE-STD-1156-2011, Environmental Compliance Functional Area Qualification Standard.

42

Office of Enforcement - Compliance Orders  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Enforcement Preliminary Notice of Violation and Compliance Order isued to Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc., relating to events at the Spent Nuclear Fuels Project, K-Basins and other...

43

Environmental Compliance 2-1 2. Environmental Compliance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

operate under leasing arrangements at the ETTP under the DOE Rein- dustrialization Program. LesseesEnvironmental Compliance 2-1 2. Environmental Compliance It is DOE-ORO and National Nuclear, executive orders, DOE orders (as incorporated into the op- erating contracts), and best management practices

Pennycook, Steve

44

Environmental Compliance 2-1 2. Environmental Compliance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

at the ETTP under the DOE Rein- dustrialization Program. Lessees are accountable for complying with all facilities at the ETTP site have been leased to private entities over the past several years through the DOEEnvironmental Compliance 2-1 2. Environmental Compliance It is DOE-ORO and NNSA policy to conduct

Pennycook, Steve

45

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

81 81 Project lnfonnation Project Title: CBM Gas Separator Date: 2-23-2010 DOE Code: 6720-020-51131 Contractor Code: Project Lead: Mark Duletsky Project Overview None anticipated, uses producing well on pre-existing location. 1. What are the environmental impacts? 48-2-X-28 Location, 447' FSL. 2495 FWL, SE, SW, Sec. 28, T39N, R78W, Natrona County. Wyoming USA 2. Wnat is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? 5days 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, Forkfift. winch truck. water truck etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Special ist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NO'TE: H Change of Scope occurs, Proj ect Lead m u st $ubmlt a new NEPA Compllance Suntey and

46

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Project lnfonnation Project Title: NODA 2. Reclamation of decommissioned Date: 8/4/2011 batteries, test satellites, and facilities DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Overview NODA 2. Reclamation of decommissioned batteries, test satellites, and 1. Brief project description [include facilities : anything that could impact the environment] ex 81 .3 and ex 86.1 Small-scale, short-term cleanup actions including excavation or consolidation of contaminated soils, removal of equipment and underground piping , drainage control, and reseeding. NOD req uired to ensure compliance with Reclamation Procedures. The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

47

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Change out down guy on power pole Date: 2-8-10 DOE Code : Contractor Code: Project Lead: Mike Preston Project Overview 1 What are the environmental No impact to the environment impacts? Power pole east of B-1 -33 2. What is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? 3Hr 4. What major equipment will be used if any (worl< over rig, drilling rig, Backhoe and operator for equ1 pment etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE; If Chiing

48

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

~ ~ -o ~ ~ -o Project lnfonnation Project Title: Replace Down Guy Rod 24~3 Date: 11/30/09 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Mike Preston Project Overview Replace Down Guy Rod Emergency The pole was ready to Break Wire 5' above the ground 1. What are the environmental impacts? 24-SHX-3 2. What is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? 5 hr 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc,)? Back hole The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTe If Change of Scope oe~. Project Lead must sutlmft a new NEPA ColT pll~ Sunley and c ontact the T echnical Assurance Department. Impacts If YES, then complete below

49

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Project_!.!!formatlon Doll!r Reseed~ ~u.pment and Ol.mp lludts The table below Ia to be completed by the Project Lead and ,.vi-ed by the Envwonmental Spec1ull.r ao\d the DOll NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE, If Ch *r :,r· ol .ir.Uf · OC" '" , PtOj

50

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

. NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY Project lnfonnation Project Title: Reclamation of Pits and Boxes Date: Nov. 3, 2010 DOE Code: 6740.010.00000 Contractor Code: 8067-451 Project Lead: Anthony Bowler Project Overview Reclamation of QD.]y the following Pits and Boxes : 1. Brief project description [include 1. B-2-1 0 Skim Box anything that could impact the 2. B-1-14 Skim Box environment 3. Near66-1-STX-14 Pit 2. Legal location 4. T-5-10 Skim Box 3. Duration of the project 5. WDFUpperPit 6. WDFLowerPit 4. Major equipment to be used 7. WDFSkimBox 8. B-1-3 Pit 9. B-1 -3 Skim Box 10. T-2-34 Pit 11 . B-1-10 Pit 12. B-1 -10 Skim Box 13. SE of SG3 & Welding Shop Skim Box 14. 58.Q4-1-SX-3 Skim Box 15. Near Tank 126 Skim Box 16. 77-1-SX-3 NW of Well Pit 17. T-5-3 Pit

51

Oil Mist Compliance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report summarizes activities at the KCP related to evaluating and modifying machine tools in order to be in compliance with Section 23 of DOE 10 CFR 851, Worker Safety and Health Program. Section 851.23 (a) states that Contractors must comply with the following safety and health standards that are applicable to the hazards in their covered workplace, and subsection 9 contains the following applicable standard: American Congress of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices, (2005) (incorporated by reference, see 851.27) when the ACGIH Threshold Limit Values are lower (more protective) than permissible exposure limits in 29 CFR 1910. In the 2005 ACGIH Threshold Limit Value book a Notice of Change was issued for exposure to mineral oil mist used in metalworking fluids (MWFs). The effects of planning for the new facility and which machine tools would be making the transition to the new facility affected which machine tools were modified.

Lazarus, Lloyd

2009-02-02T23:59:59.000Z

52

Environmental Compliance Management System  

SciTech Connect

Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) is developing the Environmental Compliance Management System (ECMS) as a comprehensive, cost-effective tool to ensure (1) that the Laboratory complies with all applicable federal and state environmental laws and regulations, (2) that environmental issues and concerns are recognized and considered in the early phases of projects; and (3) that Laboratory personnel conduct Laboratory operations in the most environmentally acceptable manner. The ECMS is an expert computer system which is designed to allow project engineers to perform an environmental evaluation of their projects. The system includes a Master Program which collects basic project information, provide utility functions, and access the environmental expert modules, environmental expert system modules for each federal and state environmental law which allows the user to obtain specific information on how an individual law may affect his project; and site-specific databases which contain information necessary for effective management of the site under environmental regulations. The ECMS will have the capability to complete and print many of the necessary environmental forms required by federal and state agencies, including the Department of Energy.

Brownson, L.W.; Krsul, T.; Peralta, R.A. [Argonne National Lab., Idaho Falls, ID (United States); Knudson, D.A.; Rosignolo, C.L. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States)

1992-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

53

Environmental Compliance Management System  

SciTech Connect

Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) is developing the Environmental Compliance Management System (ECMS) as a comprehensive, cost-effective tool to ensure (1) that the Laboratory complies with all applicable federal and state environmental laws and regulations, (2) that environmental issues and concerns are recognized and considered in the early phases of projects; and (3) that Laboratory personnel conduct Laboratory operations in the most environmentally acceptable manner. The ECMS is an expert computer system which is designed to allow project engineers to perform an environmental evaluation of their projects. The system includes a Master Program which collects basic project information, provide utility functions, and access the environmental expert modules, environmental expert system modules for each federal and state environmental law which allows the user to obtain specific information on how an individual law may affect his project; and site-specific databases which contain information necessary for effective management of the site under environmental regulations. The ECMS will have the capability to complete and print many of the necessary environmental forms required by federal and state agencies, including the Department of Energy.

Brownson, L.W.; Krsul, T.; Peralta, R.A. (Argonne National Lab., Idaho Falls, ID (United States)); Knudson, D.A.; Rosignolo, C.L. (Argonne National Lab., IL (United States))

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

54

Data:331097b1-5323-4873-86ec-4d6cafe260b7 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

7b1-5323-4873-86ec-4d6cafe260b7 7b1-5323-4873-86ec-4d6cafe260b7 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Long Island Power Authority Effective date: 2013/06/01 End date if known: Rate name: 184 (Time of Use-Residential, Voluntary, Multiple Periods) Sector: Residential Description: (With or without space heating) Term: These rates can be terminated either by the customer upon five days written notice to LIPA or by LIPA in the manner provided by our tariff. Customers may switch to another service classification for which they qualify on their annual anniversary date, provided they request the transfer in writing at least 30 days in advance

55

Regulatory Compliance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Regulatory Compliance Regulatory Compliance Regulatory Compliance This photo shows the inside the K West Basin facility, where workers are retrieving highly radioactive sludge material under 17 feet of water. This photo shows the inside the K West Basin facility, where workers are retrieving highly radioactive sludge material under 17 feet of water. The Department of Energy is not a regulatory agency; however it does self-regulate its own radioactive waste. DOE is also affected by a variety of statutes, legislation, regulations, directives and guidance. Many of the current compliance-related actions revolve around waste and material disposition. These include National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Environmental Impact Statements and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) Records of Decision. Links, below,

56

Risk Analysis & Security Rule Compliance Activities  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Risk Analysis & Security Rule Compliance Activities Marissa Gordon- Nguyen, JD, MPH Health Information Privacy Specialist ...

2010-05-13T23:59:59.000Z

57

Technical Consumer Products - Compliance Test Laboratory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Technical Consumer Products - Compliance Test Laboratory. NVLAP Lab Code: 200571-0. Address and Contact Information: ...

2013-09-20T23:59:59.000Z

58

EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Compliance for  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Alternative Compliance for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets to someone by E-mail Share EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Compliance for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Facebook Tweet about EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Compliance for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Twitter Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Compliance for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Google Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Compliance for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Delicious Rank EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Compliance for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Digg Find More places to share EPAct Transportation Regulatory

59

BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM Iowa Compliance Implementation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Iowa Iowa Compliance Implementation and Evaluation (CIE) Guide COMPLIANCE IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION (CIE) GUIDE 2 This Guide is designed to assist state and local code jurisdictions in achieving statewide compliance with the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) for residential buildings and ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007 for commercial buildings. COMPLIANCE IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION (CIE) GUIDE 3 Iowa WHAT'S INSIDE CIE Guide Overview-Flow Diagram ........................................................................................................................... 5 PART 1: Guide Overview .................................................................................................................................................

60

Code Compliance Technical Meeting: Building Technologies Office  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Compliance Compliance Technical Meeting: Building Technologies Office Department of Energy Washington, DC APRIL 2013 1 Welcome Welcome to The Building Technologies Office's Code Compliance Technical Meeting and to Washington, DC. On behalf of the Department of Energy Building Technology Office (BTO), we would like to thank you for attending, for your participation. The goal of this meeting is to review and discuss ongoing projects and existing activities that improve compliance with model energy codes. DOE

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fleet-wide cafe compliance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

certification, compliance and enforcement regulations for Commercial...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

needs to be redone. certification, compliance and enforcement regulations for Commercial Refrigeration Equipment (CRE) More Documents & Publications Regulatory Burden RFI...

62

Tools for NEPA compliance: Baseline reports and compliance guides  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Environmental baseline documents and NEPA compliance guides should be carried in every NEPA implementation ``tool kit``. These two indispensable tools can play a major role in avoiding repeated violations of NEPA requirements that have occurred over the past 26 years. This paper describes these tools, discusses their contents, and explains how they are used to prepare better NEPA documents more cost-effectively. Focus is on experience at Sandia Laboratories (NM).

Wolff, T.A. [Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States); Hansen, R.P. [Hansen Environmental Consultants, Englewood, CO (United States)

1994-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

63

Control of magnetic, nonmagnetic, and superconducting states in annealed Ca(Fe1?xCox)2As2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

We have grown single-crystal samples of Co substituted CaFe2As2 using an FeAs flux and systematically studied the effects of annealing/quenching temperature on the physical properties of these samples. Whereas the as-grown samples (quenched from 960 ?C) all enter the collapsed tetragonal phase upon cooling, annealing/quenching temperatures between 350 and 800 ?C can be used to tune the system to low-temperature antiferromagnetic/orthorhomic or superconducting states as well. The progression of the transition temperature versus annealing/quenching temperature (T-Tanneal) phase diagrams with increasing Co concentration shows that, by substituting Co, the antiferromagnetic/orthorhombic and the collapsed tetragonal phase lines are separated and bulk superconductivity is revealed. We established a 3D phase diagram with Co concentration and annealing/quenching temperature as two independent control parameters. At ambient pressure, for modest x and Tanneal values, the Ca(Fe1?xCox)2As2 system offers ready access to the salient low-temperature states associated with Fe-based superconductors: antiferromagnetic/orthorhombic, superconducting, and nonmagnetic/collapsed tetragonal.

Ran, Sheng; Budko, Serguei L.; Straszheim, Warren E.; Soh, Jing-Han; Kim, Min Gyu; Kreyssig, Andreas; Goldman, Alan I.; Canfield, Paul C.

2012-06-22T23:59:59.000Z

64

NPT Compliance | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Compliance | National Nuclear Security Administration Compliance | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog NPT Compliance Home > Our Mission > Managing the Stockpile > NPT Compliance NPT Compliance Maintaining the safety, security and effectiveness of the nuclear deterrent without nuclear testing - especially at lower numbers - requires

65

Annual Energy Outlook 2010: With Projections to 2035  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

average average fleet-wide fuel economy and CO2-equivalent emissions compliance levels, model years 2012-2016: Environmental Protection Agency and National Highway Traffic Safety Administra- tion, Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Stan- dards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards; Fi- nal Rule, 40 CFR, Parts 85, 86, and 600, 49 CFR Parts 531, 533, 537, and 538 [EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0472; FRL-_8959-4; NHTSA-2009-0059], RIN 2060-AP58; RIN 2127-AK50 (Washington, DC, April 2010), web site www.nhtsa.dot.gov/ staticfiles/DOT/NHTSA/Rulemaking/Rules/ AssociatedFiles/CAFE-GHG-MY_2012-2016_Final_Rule_ v2. pdf. Table 2. Renewable portfolio standards in the 30 States with current mandates: U.S. Energy Informa- tion Administration, Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting. Based on a review of enabling legislation and regulatory actions from the various

66

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Environmental Compliance Qualification Standard Reference Guide DECEMBER 2011 Table of Contents i LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... iii ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ iv PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ........................................................................................................................................... 1

67

Compliance Certification Enforcement | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Compliance Certification Enforcement Compliance Certification Enforcement Compliance Certification Enforcement DOE enforces the energy and water conservation regulations established by the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Appliance Standards Program to ensure that residential, commercial and industrial equipment deliver the energy and cost savings required by law. To ensure that all covered products comply with the energy and water conservation standards, the enforcement office reviews manufacturers' compliance with certification requirements. Products covered under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, as amended, are required annually to ''certify by means of a certification report that each basic model(s) meets the applicable energy conservation standard." This program

68

Definition: Compliance Monitor | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

compliance of responsible entities with reliability standards.1 Related Terms sustainability References Glossary of Terms Used in Reliability Standards An LikeLike...

69

BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM Nevada Compliance Implementation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

key routes through the Guide Route Number 1: The Guide provides the state agency or organization that is responsible for statewide compliance certification a set of action sheets...

70

Part II, General Compliance Supplement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A. ACTIVITIES ALLOWED OR UNALLOWED Compliance Requirements The specific requirements for activities allowed or unallowed are unique to each DOE Federal award or program and are found in the laws, regulations, and the provisions of contract or grant agreements pertaining to the program. In addition, ARRA has established a cross-cutting unallowable activity for all ARRA-funded awards. Pursuant to Section 1604 of ARRA, none of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available in ARRA may be used by any State or local government, or any private entity, for any casino or other gambling establishment, aquarium, zoo, golf course, or swimming pool. Source of Governing Requirements The requirements for activities allowed or unallowed are contained in program legislation or, as

71

South Valley Compliance Agreement Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

South Valley South Valley Agreement Name South Valley Superfund Site Interagency Agreement State New Mexico Agreement Type Compliance Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary Interagency Agreement with the U.S. Air Force for payment of costs associated with the remediation of two operable units (the facility and San Jose 6) at the South Valley Superfund Site. Parties DOE; U.S. Air Force Date 9/26/1990 SCOPE * Set forth the actions required of the USAF and DOE to fulfill their respective responsibilities pursuant to the Settlement Agreement between DOE, USAF, and General Electric Company (8/29/1990). * Establish mechanism by which DOE will transfer, to a fund managed by the USAF, its share of the costs set forth in the Settlement Agreement. * Set forth each party's responsibilities and respective share of costs.

72

II. GENERAL COMPLIANCE SUPPLEMENT INTRODUCTION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A. ACTIVITIES ALLOWED OR UNALLOWED Compliance Requirements The specific requirements for activities allowed or unallowed are unique to each DOE Federal award or program and are found in the laws, regulations, and the provisions of contract or grant agreements pertaining to the program. In addition, ARRA has established a cross-cutting unallowable activity for all ARRA-funded awards. Pursuant to Section 1604 of ARRA, none of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available in ARRA may be used by any State or local government, or any private entity, for any casino or other gambling establishment, aquarium, zoo, golf course, or swimming pool. Source of Governing Requirements The requirements for activities allowed or unallowed are contained in program legislation or, as

73

Environmental Compliance Audit& Assessment Program Manual  

SciTech Connect

This document describes the elements, schedule, roles, and responsibilities of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) Environmental Compliance Audit & Assessment Program (ECAAP). The ECAAP has been developed to meet the requirements of DOE Order 450.1A,1 and Executive Order 13423.2 These referenced Orders stipulate that government agencies must develop environmental compliance audit programs to monitor and improve compliance with environmental regulations. As stated specifically in the DOE Order, as a part of a DOE facility's Environmental Management System (EMS), 'An environmental compliance audit and review program that identifies compliance deficiencies and root causes of non-compliance' shall be developed and implemented. The ECAAP has also been developed to satisfy LBNL's institutional technical assurance assessment requirements promulgated in the Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Self-Assessment Program (LBNL/PUB-5344) and described by the ES&H Technical Assurance Program (TAP) Manual (LBNL/PUB-913E). The ES&H TAP Manual provides the framework for systematic reviews of ES&H programs with the intent to provide assurance that these programs comply with their guiding regulations, are effective, and are properly implemented. As required by the DOE and Executive Orders and by LBNL's TAP, the goal of the ECAAP is to identify environmental regulatory compliance deficiencies and to determine their respective causes. The ECAAP then provides a means of correcting any deficiencies identified, and leads to continually improving environmental compliance performance.

Thorson, Patrick; Baskin, David; Borglin, Ned; Fox, Robert; Wahl, Linnea; Hatayama, Howard; Pauer, Ronald

2009-03-13T23:59:59.000Z

74

Data:1c71cafe-28c9-4db5-9633-e3d7152483f4 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

cafe-28c9-4db5-9633-e3d7152483f4 cafe-28c9-4db5-9633-e3d7152483f4 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Atlantic City Electric Co Effective date: 2013/02/01 End date if known: Rate name: SPL Experimental Light Emitting Diode Post Top 100 W Sector: Lighting Description: The following rates shall be applied to the kWh Usage for the particular light type and size to determine the monthly charge per light. Source or reference: http://www.atlanticcityelectric.com/_res/documents/NJTariffSectionIV.pdf Source Parent: Comments Applicability Demand (kW) Minimum (kW): Maximum (kW): History (months):

75

Data:Fe52bfa0-ff17-45c6-b1a0-e9cafe7cef10 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

bfa0-ff17-45c6-b1a0-e9cafe7cef10 bfa0-ff17-45c6-b1a0-e9cafe7cef10 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Howard Greeley Rural P P D Effective date: End date if known: Rate name: Village Miscellaneous Single Phase Demand Sector: Commercial Description: Source or reference: Illinois State University Binder #10 Source Parent: Comments Applicability Demand (kW) Minimum (kW): Maximum (kW): History (months): Energy (kWh) Minimum (kWh): Maximum (kWh): History (months): Service Voltage Minimum (V): Maximum (V): Character of Service Voltage Category: Phase Wiring: << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> << Previous

76

Using EnergyPlus for California Title-24 compliance calculations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Using EnergyPlus for California Title-24 compliance calculations Title Using EnergyPlus for California Title-24 compliance calculations Publication Type Conference Paper LBNL...

77

EA-1406: Ground Water Compliance at the New Rifle, Colorado,...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6: Ground Water Compliance at the New Rifle, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site, Rifle, Colorado EA-1406: Ground Water Compliance at the New Rifle, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site, Rifle,...

78

Environmental Compliance Performance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Compliance » Environmental Compliance » Environmental Compliance Performance Environmental Compliance Performance Most Office of Environmental Management (EM) cleanup is being performed under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) through Federal Facility Agreements as well as under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) through various consent orders, agreements, and decrees with states. These agreements and orders identify milestones associated with cleanup actions and dates by which those milestones are to be met. DOE has approximately 40 agreements and orders in place with its State and Federal regulators dealing with EM's cleanup mission. Major enforceable milestones are those which have fixed, mandatory due dates and, in EM's view, represent cleanup progress. EM's senior

79

Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) Implementation Study  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Many power producers are required to include a Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) Plan in their first Title V permit renewal application. In developing the CAM plan, sources must provide a reasonable assurance of compliance with the applicable emission limit(s) for each affected unit. Currently, only particulate mass emissions are of concern to power producers. Therefore, CAM plans must be based on measurable parameters that can be related to particulate emissions in a reliable manner. Since the regul...

2003-10-16T23:59:59.000Z

80

Managing license compliance in free and open source software development  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

License compliance in Free and Open Source Software development is a significant issue today and organizations using free and open source software are predominately focusing on this issue. The non-compliance to licenses in free and open source software ... Keywords: Compatibility analysis, Compliance management, Free and open source software, License compliance, Rights expression languages

G. R. Gangadharan; Vincenzo D'Andrea; Stefano Paoli; Michael Weiss

2012-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fleet-wide cafe compliance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Business Models for Code Compliance | Building Energy Codes Program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Compliance Compliance Site Map Printable Version Development Adoption Compliance Basics Compliance Evaluation Software & Web Tools Regulations Resource Center Business Models for Code Compliance The U.S. Department of Energy is coordinating strategies and activities with companies, individuals, and government entities to demonstrate, quantify, and monetize energy code compliance and coordinate deployment at the local, state, and regional levels. Consumer Assurance through Code Compliance Energy efficiency measures in the buildings sector, if properly realized and captured, provide a tremendous opportunity to reduce energy consumption and expenditures. Yet currently there is a lack of assurance that buildings as designed realize the levels of energy efficiency established in the

82

Taking compliance patterns and quality management system (QMS) framework approach to ensure medical billing compliance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The United States Office of Inspector General (OIG) has issued a number of compliance guidelines including third-party medical billing guidelines for healthcare companies in the United States to reduce errors and fraud in the field of medical billing. ... Keywords: ISO 9001, OIG, common audit framework, medical billing compliance patterns, quality management system (QMS)

Syeda Uzma Gardazi, Arshad Ali Shahid

2013-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

83

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2011 Report  

SciTech Connect

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance (EMAC) Program, funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office, monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada National Security Site and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NNSS biota. This report summarizes the program's activities conducted by National Security Technologies, LLC, during calendar year 2011. Program activities included (a) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (b) desert tortoise compliance, (c) ecosystem monitoring, (d) sensitive plant species monitoring, (e) sensitive and protected/regulated animal monitoring, (f) habitat restoration monitoring, and (g) monitoring of the Nonproliferation Test and Evaluation Complex. During 2011, all applicable laws, regulations, and permit requirements were met, enabling EMAC to achieve its intended goals and objectives.

Hansen, D. J., Anderson, D. C., Hall, D. B., Greger, P. D., Ostler, W. K.

2012-06-13T23:59:59.000Z

84

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2008 Report  

SciTech Connect

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program, funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO), monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada Test Site (NTS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NTS biota. This report summarizes the programs activities conducted by National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec), during calendar year 2008. Program activities included (a) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (b) desert tortoise compliance, (c) ecosystem mapping and data management, (d) sensitive plant species monitoring, (e) sensitive and protected/regulated animal monitoring, (f) habitat monitoring, (g) habitat restoration monitoring, and (h) monitoring of the Nonproliferation Test and Evaluation Complex (NPTEC).

Dennis J. Hansen, David C. Anderson, Derek B. Hall, Paul D. Greger, W. Kent Ostler

2009-04-30T23:59:59.000Z

85

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2010 Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance (EMAC) Program, funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO), monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NNSS biota. This report summarizes the programs activities conducted by National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec), during calendar year 2010. Program activities included (a) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (b) desert tortoise compliance, (c) ecosystem monitoring, (d) sensitive plant species monitoring, (e) sensitive and protected/regulated animal monitoring, (f) habitat restoration monitoring, and (g) monitoring of the Nonproliferation Test and Evaluation Complex (NPTEC). During 2010, all applicable laws, regulations, and permit requirements were met, enabling EMAC to achieve its intended goals and objectives.

Hansen, D.J.; Anderson, D.C.; Hall, D.B.; Greger, P.D.; Ostler, W.K.

2011-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

86

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2012 Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program (EMAC), funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office (NNSA/NFO, formerly Nevada Site Office), monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NNSS biota. This report summarizes the programs activities conducted by National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec), during calendar year 2012. Program activities included (a) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (b) desert tortoise compliance, (c) ecosystem monitoring, (d) sensitive plant species monitoring, (e) sensitive and protected/regulated animal monitoring, (f) habitat restoration monitoring, and (g) monitoring of the Nonproliferation Test and Evaluation Complex (NPTEC). During 2012, all applicable laws, regulations, and permit requirements were met, enabling EMAC to achieve its intended goals and objectives.

Hall, Derek B.; Anderson, David C.; Greger, Paul D.; Ostler, W. Kent; Hansen, Dennis J.

2013-07-03T23:59:59.000Z

87

EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Compliance Methods for State  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Compliance Methods for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets to someone by E-mail Share EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Compliance Methods for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Facebook Tweet about EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Compliance Methods for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Twitter Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Compliance Methods for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Google Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Compliance Methods for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Delicious Rank EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Compliance Methods for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Digg Find More places to share EPAct Transportation Regulatory

88

Rocky Flats Compliance Program; Technology summary  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy (DOE) established the Office of Technology Development (EM-50) (OTD) as an element of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management (EM) in November 1989. The primary objective of the Office of Technology Development, Rocky Flats Compliance Program (RFCP), is to develop altemative treatment technologies for mixed low-level waste (wastes containing both hazardous and radioactive components) to use in bringing the Rocky Flats Plant (RFP) into compliance with Federal and state regulations and agreements. Approximately 48,000 cubic feet of untreated low-level mixed waste, for which treatment has not been specified, are stored at the RFP. The cleanup of the Rocky Flats site is driven by agreements between DOE, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Colorado Department of Health (CDH). Under these agreements, a Comprehensive Treatment and Management Plan (CTMP) was drafted to outline the mechanisms by which RFP will achieve compliance with the regulations and agreements. This document describes DOE`s strategy to treat low-level mixed waste to meet Land Disposal Restrictions and sets specific milestones related to the regulatory aspects of technology development. These milestones detail schedules for the development of technologies to treat all of the mixed wastes at the RFP. Under the Federal Facilities Compliance Act (FFCA), the CTMP has been incorporated into Rocky Flats Plant Conceptual Site Treatment Plan (CSTP). The CSTP will become the Rocky Flats Plant site Treatment Plan in 1995 and will supersede the CTMP.

NONE

1994-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

89

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2007 Report  

SciTech Connect

In accordance with U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Order 450.1, 'Environmental Protection Program', the Office of the Assistant Manager for Environmental Management of the DOE, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) requires ecological monitoring and biological compliance support for activities and programs conducted at the Nevada Test Site (NTS). National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec), Ecological Services has implemented the Ecological Monitoring and Compliance (EMAC) Program to provide this support. EMAC is designed to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations, delineate and define NTS ecosystems, and provide ecological information that can be used to predict and evaluate the potential impacts of proposed projects and programs on those ecosystems. This report summarizes the EMAC activities conducted by NSTec during calendar year 2007. Monitoring tasks during 2007 included eight program areas: (a) biological surveys, (b) desert tortoise compliance, (c) ecosystem mapping and data management, (d) sensitive plant monitoring, (e) sensitive and protected/regulated animal monitoring, (f) habitat monitoring, (g) habitat restoration monitoring, and (h) biological monitoring at the Nonproliferation Test and Evaluation Complex (NPTEC). The following sections of this report describe work performed under these eight areas.

Dennis Hansen, David Anderson, Derek Hall, Paul Greger, W. Kent Ostler

2008-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

90

Data:Eeb4cafe-5457-449b-bfa3-59f07981ac6b | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Eeb4cafe-5457-449b-bfa3-59f07981ac6b Eeb4cafe-5457-449b-bfa3-59f07981ac6b No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: City of Springfield, Oregon (Utility Company) Effective date: 2012/04/01 End date if known: Rate name: Green Power GP-1 Sector: Residential Description: SUB's Green Power (GP-1) rate is an optional service. The monthly rate is the sum of the following charges: 100 KWH Block: $1.00/month per 100 kWh Block. Customers may purchase an unlimited number of 100 kWh blocks; however, SUB reserves the right to limit the number of blocks sold to an individual customer based on their forecasted electric load in order to allow all customers to participate in the program.

91

Federal Energy Management Program: EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

EISA Compliance EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data on AddThis.com... Requirements by Subject Requirements by Regulation Notices & Rules

92

A static compliance-checking framework for business process models  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Regulatory compliance of business operations is a critical problem for enterprises. As enterprises increasingly use business process management systems to automate their business processes, technologies to automatically check the compliance of process ...

Y. Liu; S. Mller; K. Xu

2007-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

93

Alternative Compliance Program: 10 CFR Part 490 (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect

Presentation explains the Alternative Compliance option under the U.S. Department of Energy's State and Alternative Fuel Provider program.

Sears, T.

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

94

Support of Industry Compliance with the EU Directive on ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Support of Industry Compliance with the EU Directive on Restriction of Certain Hazardous Substances (RoHS). Summary: ...

2013-07-23T23:59:59.000Z

95

Compliance plan for PG and E geysers unit 16  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

A plan is described to establish a monitoring system to assure that the geothermal power plant is constructed and operated in compliance with air and water quality, public health and safety, and other applicable regulations, guidelines, and conditions of the California Energy Commission. The plan is divided into: a Power Plant Compliance Plan and a Transmission Line Compliance Plan. (MHR)

Not Available

1981-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

96

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Environmental Compliance FAQS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Compliance Functional Area Qualification Standard Environmental Compliance Functional Area Qualification Standard DOE-STD-1156-2011 Step 1 Identify and evaluate tasks - Develop a comprehensive list of tasks that define the job. o A great starting point is the list of Duties and Responsibilities from the FAQS. o Give careful thought to additional tasks that could be considered. o Don't worry about deleting tasks at this point - that is a part of the process further down. - List the tasks (and their sources, e.g., Duties and Responsibilities #1) in the chart below. - Discuss each task as a group and come to a consensus pertaining to Importance and Frequency of the task (i.e., each team member can consent to the assigned value, even if they don't exactly agree with it). - When all values have been assigned, consider as a group deleting tasks

97

RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL PACKAGING TORQUE REQUIREMENTS COMPLIANCE  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Shipping containers used to transport radioactive material (RAM) in commerce employ a variety of closure mechanisms. Often, these closure mechanisms require a specific amount of torque be applied to a bolt, nut or other threaded fastener. It is important that the required preload is achieved so that the package testing and analysis is not invalidated for the purpose of protecting the public. Torque compliance is a means of ensuring closure preload, is a major factor in accomplishing the package functions of confinement/containment, sub-criticality, and shielding. This paper will address the importance of applying proper torque to package closures, discuss torque value nomenclature, and present one methodology to ensure torque compliance is achieved.

Watkins, R.; Leduc, D.

2011-03-24T23:59:59.000Z

98

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2010 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2010 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2010 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2010

99

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2013 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third

100

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fleet-wide cafe compliance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2013 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2013 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2013 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2010

102

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012

103

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012

104

Monitoring, Verification and Reporting: Improving Compliance Within Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Monitoring, Verification and Reporting: Improving Compliance Within Energy Monitoring, Verification and Reporting: Improving Compliance Within Energy Efficient Programs Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary Name: Monitoring, Verification and Reporting: Improving Compliance Within Energy Efficient Programs Agency/Company /Organization: International Energy Agency Sector: Energy Focus Area: Energy Efficiency Topics: GHG inventory, Policies/deployment programs Resource Type: Guide/manual Website: www.iea.org/papers/pathways/monitoring.pdf Monitoring, Verification and Reporting: Improving Compliance Within Energy Efficient Programs Screenshot References: Monitoring, Verification and Reporting: Improving Compliance Within Energy Efficient Programs[1] This document includes: A brief overview of MVE in the context of S&L programmes.

105

FAQS Qualification Card - Environment Compliance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environment Compliance Environment Compliance FAQS Qualification Card - Environment Compliance A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-EnvironmentalCompliance.docx Description Environment Compliance Qualification Card More Documents & Publications FAQS Qualification Card - Safeguards and Security General Technical Base

106

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012

107

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09 09 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010

108

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First

109

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009

110

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2011

111

Compliance with Energy Codes | Building Energy Codes Program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Compliance with Energy Codes Compliance with Energy Codes Energy code compliance must be achieved to realize the considerable benefits inherent in energy codes. BECP supports successful compliance by making no-cost compliance tools, REScheck(tm) and COMcheck(tm), and other resources widely available to everyone. BECP has also developed several resources to help states uniformly assess the rate of compliance with their energy codes for residential and commercial buildings. It is important to note that regardless of the level of enforcement, as a law the building owner/developer is ultimately responsible to comply with the energy code. Compliance will be increased if the adopting agency prepares the building construction community to comply with the energy code and provides resources to code officials to enforce it.

112

The Washington State Experience Energy Code Compliance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Washington State Experience Washington State Experience Residential Energy Code Compliance Gary Nordeen Senior Building Science Specialist April 4, 2013 WSU Energy Program Provides energy services, products, education and information for: * Businesses * Utilities ̶ public and private * Governments ̶ state and local * Tribes * Federal agencies * Manufacturing plants * Educational facilities * National laboratories WSU Energy Program Building Science Team * Residential energy code technical assistance * Voluntary programs, Northwest ENERGYSTAR Homes * Research and development, Building America * Community-based upgrade programs * Industry training and certifications ̶ HERS, BPI, ENERGY STAR, PTCS Staff provides building science expertise for: WSU Energy Program

113

Environmental Compliance Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

56-2011 56-2011 June 2011 DOE STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; further dissemination unlimited. (Unclassified Unlimited) DOE-STD-1156-2011 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ DOE-STD-1156-2011 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENT v PURPOSE 1 APPLICABILITY 1 IMPLEMENTATION 2 EVALUATION REQUIREMENTS 3 INITIAL QUALIFICATION AND TRAINING 5

114

WICF Certification, Compliance and Enforcement webinar  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WICF Testing, Certification, WICF Testing, Certification, Compliance, and Enforcement Overview August 30, 2011 2 | Building Technologies Program & General Counsel's Office of Enforcement eere.energy.gov Agenda 2 Certified Ratings 3 1 Testing Basic Model Enforcement 4 5 Manufacturer How to Submit Questions 6 3 | Building Technologies Program & General Counsel's Office of Enforcement eere.energy.gov Manufacturer Explanation A Manufacturer of a WICF * Is a domestic manufacturer or an importer. * Produces a component of a walk-in cooler or walk-in freezer that affects energy consumption, including, but not limited to, refrigeration, doors, lights, windows, or walls.

115

Los Alamos National Laboratory Compliance Order, October 4, 1995 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Facility Compliance Order Federal Facility Compliance Order State New Mexico Agreement Type Compliance Agreement Legal Driver(s) New Mexico Hazardous Waste Act (NMHWA)/ FFCAct /RCRA Scope Summary Require compliance with a Site Treatment Plan for the treatment of mixed waste at Los Alamos National Lab. Parties DOE; University of California; New Mexico Environment Department Date 10/04/1995 SCOPE * Require compliance with a Site Treatment Plan for the treatment of mixed waste at Los Alamos National Lab. * Bring the Los Alamos National Lab into compliance with the requirements for the storage and treatment of mixed waste under RCRA and the NMHWA. * Establish that DOE and the University of California have both joint and several liability for meeting the conditions of the agreement.

116

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program Fiscal Year 1999 Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Ecological and Compliance program, funded through the U. S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office, monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada Test Site (NTS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NTS biota. This report summarizes the program's activities conducted by Bechtel Nevada during fiscal year 1999. Program activities included: (1) biological surveys at proposed construction sites (2) desert tortoise compliance (3) ecosystem mapping (4) sensitive species and unique habitat monitoring and (5) biological monitoring at the HAZMAT Spill Center.

Cathy A. Wills

1999-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

117

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY Project Information Project Title:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Dig d~ch from 24-51-5TX-1 0 to 24-AX-10 and reinstall electrical wire Dig d~ch from 24-51-5TX-1 0 to 24-AX-10 and reinstall electrical wire Date: 12120/2010 DOE Coda: Contractor Coda: Project Lead: Marcus Bruckner Project Overview 1 Dig ditch from 24-51-8TX-1 0 to 24-AX-10 and remove and replace electrical wire {N 2.7o') 1. Brief project desalptlon Pnclude anything that oould impact the 2. 24-51-5TX-10 and 24-AX-10 (SW r.tN 10TOWNSHIP 38 NORTH RANGE 78WEST) environment] 2. Leg allocation 3. 1 day 3. Duration of the project 4. Major equipment to be used 4. Backhoe The table below is to be completed by the Project Leed and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and contact the Technical Assurance Department.

118

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fourth Quarter Fourth Quarter FY2009 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2010

119

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fourth Quarter Fourth Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012

120

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

First Quarter First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fleet-wide cafe compliance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Second Quarter Second Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010

122

Lighting Development, Adoption, and Compliance Guide BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM I  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lighting Development, Adoption, and Compliance Guide BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM I Lighting Development, Adoption, and Compliance Guide BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM I Lighting BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM Development, Adoption, and Compliance Guide Lighting BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM September 2012 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 | PNNL-SA-90653 Development, Adoption, and Compliance Guide 3.3 Exterior Lighting Controls ...........................................................................24 3.3.1 Dusk to Dawn Controls ...............................................................................25 3.3.2 Lighting Power Reduction Controls ........................................................25 3.3.3 Parking Garage Controls ............................................................................26

123

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 Recipient. aunty of Montgomery, MD ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific...

124

APPENDIX J: STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH DOE SEISMICITY PROTOCOL  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

compliance with the "Protocol for Induced Seismicity Associated with Enhanced Geothermal Systems". Calpine Corporation and other Geysers geothermal operators have long been...

125

State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleet Compliance Methods (Revised) (Brochure)  

SciTech Connect

Fact sheet describes the difference between Standard and Alternative Compliance requirements for state and alternative fuel provider fleets covered under the Energy Policy Acts of 1992 and 2005.

Not Available

2009-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

126

Compliance and Enforcement Basics | Building Energy Codes Program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

& Offices Consumer Information Building Energy Codes Search Search Search Help Building Energy Codes Program Home News Events About DOE EERE BTO BECP Compliance Site...

127

Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement Powerpoint Presentation for ASHRAE Conference, January 31, 2011 Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification,...

128

Environmental Protection- Industrial Compliance (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Industrial Compliance Section develops and administers Certificates of Approval for the Construction and/or Operation of various industrial facilities. Industries with air emissions and/or...

129

Department of Energy Subpoenas Compliance Data from AeroSys,...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sites Power Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home Department of Energy Subpoenas Compliance Data from AeroSys, Inc. Department of Energy Subpoenas...

130

Animal Agriculture Compliance Act (Iowa) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Compliance Act (Iowa) Policy Type Environmental Regulations Affected Technologies BiomassBiogas Active Policy Yes Implementing Sector StateProvince Program Administrator...

131

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Second Quarter Second Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012

132

Guidelines for Obtaining Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) Permits  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) is a relatively new regulation that will affect virtually every coal-fired plant in the United States by the end of 2010.

2005-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

133

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY NEPA Review Routing Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA Review Routing Form NEPA Review Routing Form A ::opy of Compliance Surveys for rev.ew. Revised 812/1 0 mjt Originator: Technical Assurance Department - Enylronmental Group D ocument Name: ~a'5 ll:?f\ " B-rr . J(j Bur I e.d ~ (ec-tr ; rJL{ u ~ Documont Numbor: 3 a 5 Date or Routing: ~ I~ I a() II Namo Roviowod Signature Date (~~ Thaf I CUt 1 -f CJ./ W./11 ~ A /rt ...... "" . A-~ r;;;;I £1 "3 7i7 .-J;_~~· ~~ / ' I" - 4 ' . # / . - . 1 ?9 '1' l p /=-- Z-4-11 ,_, y~ -- - - - - - - - - ~ L- ·~~ ,....... ,_ ,.,.. ....... , "'t _,.., , ....... '" / / /1 /7/1....., ,..I\. / / I F r-Q V C. .L> I \ I I ..... Forwarded Forwarded To Date i-t l.tlbrub ~ r:H:.. ~rrr

134

STATE OF CALIFORNIA CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, PRESCRIPTIVE HVAC ALTERATIONS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, PRESCRIPTIVE HVAC ALTERATIONS CEC-MECH-1C-ALT-HVAC (Revised 07/10) CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE MECH-1C-ALT-HVAC Prescriptive HVAC Steps" column below. Note: After installation of HVAC units and/or ducts, the Installation

135

National Environmental Policy Act compliance guide. Volume II (reference book)  

SciTech Connect

This document (Volume II of the National Environmental Policy Act Compliance Guide) contains current copies of regulations and guidance from the Council on Environmental Quality, the Department of Energy, the Department of State, and the Environmental Protection Agency, related to compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA).

NONE

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

136

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program Fiscal Year 2003 Report  

SciTech Connect

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance program, funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office, monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada Test Site and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to Nevada Test Site biota. This report summarizes the program's activities conducted by Bechtel Nevada during fiscal year 2003.

Bechtel Nevada

2003-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

137

Compliance Verification Paths for Residential and Commercial Energy Codes  

SciTech Connect

This report looks at different ways to verify energy code compliance and to ensure that the energy efficiency goals of an adopted document are achieved. Conformity assessment is the body of work that ensures compliance, including activities that can ensure residential and commercial buildings satisfy energy codes and standards. This report identifies and discusses conformity-assessment activities and provides guidance for conducting assessments.

Conover, David R.; Makela, Eric J.; Fannin, Jerica D.; Sullivan, Robin S.

2011-10-10T23:59:59.000Z

138

Preliminary Comments on Compliance Plan and Request for Clarification or,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on Compliance Plan and Request for Comments on Compliance Plan and Request for Clarification or, in the Alternative, Rehearing of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission Preliminary Comments on Compliance Plan and Request for Clarification or, in the Alternative, Rehearing of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission Docket No. EO-05-01: Pursuant to Order No. 202-05-3, issued by the Department of Energy ("DOE") in the above-captioned docket on December 20, 2005 ("December 20 Order"), and Section 313 of the Federal Power Act ("FPA"), 16 U.S.C. § 8251, the District of Columbia Public Service Commission ("DCPSC") hereby submits its preliminary comments on the compliance plan ("Compliance Plan") proposed by MiranT Potomac River,

139

Compliance Order, Los Alamos National Security, LLC - July 12, 2007 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Compliance Order, Los Alamos National Security, LLC - July 12, 2007 Compliance Order, Los Alamos National Security, LLC - July 12, 2007 Compliance Order, Los Alamos National Security, LLC - July 12, 2007 July 12, 2007 Issued to Los Alamos National Security, LLC related to the Unauthorized Reproduction and Removal of Classified Matter from the Los Alamos National Laboratory The Compliance Order directs LANS to implement specific corrective actions to remediate both the laboratory management deficiencies that contributed to the thumb drive security incident at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) discovered in October 2006 and, more broadly, longstanding deficiencies in the classified information and cyber security programs at LANL. Violation of the Compliance Order would subject LANS to issuance of a notice of violation and assessment of civil penalties up to S100,000 per

140

Compliance Order, Los Alamos National Security, LLC - July 12, 2007 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Compliance Order, Los Alamos National Security, LLC - July 12, 2007 Compliance Order, Los Alamos National Security, LLC - July 12, 2007 Compliance Order, Los Alamos National Security, LLC - July 12, 2007 July 12, 2007 Issued to Los Alamos National Security, LLC related to the Unauthorized Reproduction and Removal of Classified Matter from the Los Alamos National Laboratory The Compliance Order directs LANS to implement specific corrective actions to remediate both the laboratory management deficiencies that contributed to the thumb drive security incident at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) discovered in October 2006 and, more broadly, longstanding deficiencies in the classified information and cyber security programs at LANL. Violation of the Compliance Order would subject LANS to issuance of a notice of violation and assessment of civil penalties up to S100,000 per

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fleet-wide cafe compliance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Oak Ridge Reservation Compliance Order, September 26, 1995  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reservation Compliance Order, September 26, 1995 Page 1 of 5 Reservation Compliance Order, September 26, 1995 Page 1 of 5 EM Home | Regulatory Compliance | Environmental Compliance Agreements Oak Ridge Reservation Compliance Order, September 26, 1995 STATE OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION IN THE MATTER OF: ) ) ) DIVISION OF SOLID WASTE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ) MANAGEMENT ENERGY ) ) CASE NO. 95-0514 RESPONDENT ) Commissioner's Order NOW COMES Don Dills, Commissioner of the Department of Environment and Conservation, and states that: Table of Contents Parties Jurisdiction Facts Order Reservation of Rights Notice of Rights Parties I. Don Dills is the duly appointed Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation ("the Department"). II. The United States Department of Energy ("DOE")is a department, agency and instrumentality of the

142

EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data October 8, 2013 - 2:06pm Addthis The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) provides links to reports and data illustrating Federal progress in meeting the requirements outlined in Section 432 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA) (42 U.S.C. 8253(f)) available through the EISA 432 Compliance Tracking System (CTS). EISA 432 CTS Data Levels Top-tier agency aggregates, representing all reported data subject to the EISA 432 requirements Facility-level detailed data that excludes information for facilities that have requested exemption from public disclosure for national-security purposes. Access Data Federal Government Compliance Overview: View key CTS metrics and aggregates

143

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2006 Report  

SciTech Connect

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance program (EMAC), funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO), monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada Test Site (NTS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NTS biota. This report summarizes the program's activities conducted by National Security Technologies LLC (NSTec) during the Calendar Year 2006. Program activities included: (a) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (b) desert tortoise compliance, (c) ecosystem mapping and data management, (d) sensitive plant species monitoring, (e) sensitive and protected/regulated animal monitoring, (f) habitat monitoring, (g) habitat restoration monitoring, and (h) monitoring of the Nonproliferation Test and Evaluation Complex (NPTEC). Sensitive and protected/regulated species of the NTS include 44 plants, 1 mollusk, 2 reptiles, over 250 birds, and 26 mammals protected, managed, or considered sensitive as per state or federal regulations and natural resource agencies and organizations. The threatened desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) is the only species on the NTS protected under the Endangered Species Act. Biological surveys for the presence of sensitive and protected/regulated species and important biological resources on which they depend were conducted for 34 projects. A total of 342.1 hectares (ha) (845.37 acres [ac]) was surveyed for these projects. Sensitive and protected/regulated species and important biological resources found included: 2 inactive tortoise burrows, 2 western burrowing owls (Athene cunicularia hypugaea), several horses (Equus caballus), 2 active predator burrows, mature Joshua trees (Yucca brevifolia), yuccas and cacti; and also 1 bird nest (2 eggs), 1 barn owl (Tyto alba) and 2 great-horned owls (Bubo virginianus). NSTec provided a written summary report of all survey findings and mitigation recommendations, where applicable. All flagged burrows were avoided during construction activities. Twenty one of the 34 projects had sites within the distribution range of the threatened desert tortoise. NNSA/NSO must comply with the terms and conditions of a permit (called a Biological Opinion) from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) when conducting work in tortoise habitat. No tortoises were found in or displaced from project areas. No desert tortoises were accidentally injured or killed, nor were any captured or displaced from project sites. One desert tortoise was accidentally killed along a paved road. One site specific re-vegetation plan was submitted this year as required by the desert tortoise habitat re-vegetation plan approved in 2004. This year a total of 1.89 ha (4.69 ac) of tortoise habitat was disturbed. Re-vegetation of habitat at the Bren Tower burn was completed in the spring of 2006. In the summer of 2006, NSTec scientists prepared a Biological Assessment of the security activities that were being conducted at the Device Assembly Facility (DAF). NNSA requested a Biological Opinion from FWS in late 2006. Ecosystem mapping and data management in 2006 focused primarily on two tasks: (a) converting hardcopies of about 17 reports (EMAC annual reports and selected topical reports from 1996 to 2003) into electronic versions (Portable Document Format [PDF] files) to facilitate electronic document exchange, rapid retrieval, duplication, and printing, and (b) conducting an annual vegetation survey to determine wildland fire hazards on the NTS. Copies of the PDF documents were sent to DOE's Office of Scientific and Technical Information website in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and the DOE National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Public Reading Facility.

David C. Anderson; Paul D. Greger; Derek B. Hall; Dennis J. Hansen; William K. Ostler

2007-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

144

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2006 Report  

SciTech Connect

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance program (EMAC), funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO), monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada Test Site (NTS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NTS biota. This report summarizes the program's activities conducted by National Security Technologies LLC (NSTec) during the Calendar Year 2006. Program activities included: (a) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (b) desert tortoise compliance, (c) ecosystem mapping and data management, (d) sensitive plant species monitoring, (e) sensitive and protected/regulated animal monitoring, (f) habitat monitoring, (g) habitat restoration monitoring, and (h) monitoring of the Nonproliferation Test and Evaluation Complex (NPTEC). Sensitive and protected/regulated species of the NTS include 44 plants, 1 mollusk, 2 reptiles, over 250 birds, and 26 mammals protected, managed, or considered sensitive as per state or federal regulations and natural resource agencies and organizations. The threatened desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) is the only species on the NTS protected under the Endangered Species Act. Biological surveys for the presence of sensitive and protected/regulated species and important biological resources on which they depend were conducted for 34 projects. A total of 342.1 hectares (ha) (845.37 acres [ac]) was surveyed for these projects. Sensitive and protected/regulated species and important biological resources found included: 2 inactive tortoise burrows, 2 western burrowing owls (Athene cunicularia hypugaea), several horses (Equus caballus), 2 active predator burrows, mature Joshua trees (Yucca brevifolia), yuccas and cacti; and also 1 bird nest (2 eggs), 1 barn owl (Tyto alba) and 2 great-horned owls (Bubo virginianus). NSTec provided a written summary report of all survey findings and mitigation recommendations, where applicable. All flagged burrows were avoided during construction activities. Twenty one of the 34 projects had sites within the distribution range of the threatened desert tortoise. NNSA/NSO must comply with the terms and conditions of a permit (called a Biological Opinion) from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) when conducting work in tortoise habitat. No tortoises were found in or displaced from project areas. No desert tortoises were accidentally injured or killed, nor were any captured or displaced from project sites. One desert tortoise was accidentally killed along a paved road. One site specific revegetation plan was submitted this year as required by the desert tortoise habitat revegetation plan approved in 2004. This year a total of 1.89 ha (4.69 ac) of tortoise habitat was disturbed. Revegetation of habitat at the Bren Tower burn was completed in the spring of 2006. In the summer of 2006, NSTec scientists prepared a Biological Assessment of the security activities that were being conducted at the Device Assembly Facility (DAF). NNSA requested a Biological Opinion from FWS in late 2006. Ecosystem mapping and data management in 2006 focused primarily on two tasks: (a) converting hardcopies of about 17 reports (EMAC annual reports and selected topical reports from 1996 to 2003) into electronic versions (Portable Document Format [PDF] files) to facilitate electronic document exchange, rapid retrieval, duplication, and printing, and (b) conducting an annual vegetation survey to determine wildland fire hazards on the NTS.

David C. Anderson; Paul D. Greger; Derek B. Hall; Dennis J. Hansen; William K. Ostler

2007-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

145

EA-1155: Ground-water Compliance Activities at the Uranium Mill...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5: Ground-water Compliance Activities at the Uranium Mill Tailings Site, Spook, Wyoming EA-1155: Ground-water Compliance Activities at the Uranium Mill Tailings Site, Spook,...

146

DOE standard compliance demonstration program: An office building example  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy (DOE) issued interim new building energy standards (10 CFR 435 1989) to achieve maximum energy efficiency in the designs of new buildings. DOE then entered into a project to demonstrate and assess the impact of these standards on the design community. One area of focus was a test to see how a less conventional design-focused building would meet the standards` requirements -- DOE wanted to demonstrate that compliance with energy standards does not mean compromising the architectural intent of a building. This study, which was initiated at Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL), illustrated the process by which compliance with the standards can be proven for a highly {open_quotes}design-oriented{close_quotes} office building. The study also assessed the impact of the whole building simulation compliance alternatives on design. This report documents the compliance requirements, gives a description of the sample building chosen for the study, provides general guidance for the compliance process, documents the method of compliance that was undertaken for the sample building, presents the results of the study, and provides a recommendation on how the compliance requirements could be improved to reflect more realistic use types.

Bailey, S.A.; Keller, J.M.; Wrench, L.E.; Williams, C.J.

1993-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

147

SO2 Compliance and Allowance Trading: Developments and Outlook  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report takes a sharp look at specific questions about SO2 compliance under Title IV of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. With several years of Phase I compliance behind us, what do we know about the allowance market and compliance costs? What factors will be in play between the present with its low allowance prices and the 2000-2005 period when uncertain fossil generation growth, drawdown of the allowance bank, and the prospect of major new environmental legislation could lead to very different fut...

1997-05-05T23:59:59.000Z

148

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Biennial Environmental Compliance Report  

SciTech Connect

This Biennial Environmental Compliance Report (BECR) documents environmental regulatory compliance at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), a facility designed and authorized for the safe disposal of transuranic (TRU) radioactive waste, for the reporting period of April 1, 2002, to March 31, 2004. As required by the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act (LWA) (Public Law [Pub. L.] 102-579, as amended by Pub. L. 104-201), the BECR documents U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) compliance with applicable environmental protection laws and regulations implemented by agencies of the federal government and the state of New Mexico.

Washington Regulatory and Environmental Services (WRES)

2004-10-25T23:59:59.000Z

149

Interaction of Compliance and Voluntary Renewable Energy Markets  

SciTech Connect

In recent years, both compliance and voluntary markets have emerged to help support the development of renewable energy resources. Both of these markets are growing rapidly and today about half of U.S. states have RPS policies in place, with a number of these policies adopted in the last several years. In addition, many states have recently increased the stringency of their RPS policies. This paper examines key market interaction issues between compliance and voluntary renewable energy markets. It provides an overview of both the compliance and voluntary markets, addressing each market's history, purpose, size, scope, and benefits while addressing issues, including double counting.

Bird, L.; Lokey, E.

2007-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

150

ECOLOGICAL MONITORING AND COMPLIANCE PROGRAM CALENDAR YEAR 2005 REPORT  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance program (EMAC), funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO), monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada Test Site (NTS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NTS biota. This report summarizes the programs activities conducted by Bechtel Nevada (BN) during the Calendar Year 2005. Program activities included: (1) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (2) desert tortoise compliance, (3) ecosystem mapping and data management, (4) sensitive and protected/regulated species and unique habitat monitoring, (5) habitat restoration monitoring, and (6) biological monitoring at the Non-Proliferation Test and Evaluation Complex (NPTEC).

BECHTEL NEVADA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES

2006-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

151

Non-Compliance Tracking and Trending at LLNL  

SciTech Connect

The Criticality Safety Section at LLNL has a formal set of procedures to guide the administrative and technical work of the section. Two of these procedures, ''Response to a Criticality Safety Infraction'' and ''CSG Criticality Safety Non-Compliance and Audit Tracking System,'' provide combined guidance for response, tracking, and trending for procedural non-compliances. Combined with a database, this system provides a framework to systematically respond to, document, track and trend criticality safety non-compliances, as well as audit findings.

Huang, S T; Pearson, J S

2001-08-22T23:59:59.000Z

152

Ecological Compliance Assessment Project: 1994 Summary report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Ecological Compliance Assessment Project (ECAP) began full operation on March 1, 1994. The project is designed around a baseline environmental data concept that includes intensive biological field surveys of key areas of the Hanford Site where the majority of Site activities occur. These surveys are conducted at biologically appropriate times of year to ensure that the data gathered are current and accurate. The data are entered into the ECAP database, which serves as a reference for the evaluation of review requests coming in to the project. This methodology provided the basis for over 90 percent of the review requests received. Field surveys conducted under ECAP are performed to document occurrence information for species of concern and to obtain habitat descriptions. There are over 200 species of concern on the Hanford Site, including plants, birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians, fish, and invertebrates. In addition, Washington State has designated mature sagebrush-steppe habitat as a Priority Habitat meriting special protective measures. Of the projects reviewed, 17 resulted or will result in impacts to species or habitats of concern on the Hanford Site. The greatest impact has been on big sagebrush habitat. Most of the impact has been or will be within the 600 Area of the Site.

Brandt, C.A.

1994-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

153

Directory of Certificates of Compliance for radioactive materials packages: Certificates of Compliance. Volume 2, Revision 18  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this directory is to make available a convenient source of information on packagings which have been approved by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. To assist in identifying packaging, an index by Model Number and corresponding Certificate of Compliance Number is included at the front of Volumes 1 and 2. An alphabetical listing by user name is included in the back of Volume 3 of approved QA programs. The reports include a listing of all users of each package design and approved QA programs prior to the publication date.

NONE

1995-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

154

Evaluating Commercial Buildings for Statewide Compliance | Building Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Commercial Buildings for Statewide Compliance Commercial Buildings for Statewide Compliance The materials for this course may be used for in-person training courses, and are intended to provide the tools and specific training necessary to evaluate statewide commercial compliance with ASHRAE Standard 90.1. The course also provides useful training for the commercial provisions of the International Energy Conservation Code and general commercial field inspection for energy code compliance. The recommended background for taking this class is significant experience with plan review and/or inspection of commercial energy code provisions. Presenters: Course materials originally published by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program, July 16, 2010. Course Type: Training Materials Video In-person Downloads: Presentation Slides

155

Building Energy Codes COMPLIANCE TOOLKIT BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

COMPLIANCE TOOLKIT COMPLIANCE TOOLKIT BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM Building Energy Codes ACE LEARNING SERIES III Building Energy Codes COMPLIANCE TOOLKIT Prepared by: Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) is an information resource on energy codes and standards for buildings. They work with other government agencies, state and local jurisdictions, organizations that develop model codes and standards, and building industry to promote codes that will provide for energy and environmental benefits and help foster adoption of, compliance with, and enforcement of those codes. September 2012 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 PNNL-SA-90466 LEARNING SERIES OVERVIEW Building Energy Codes

156

Evaluating Residential Buildings for Statewide Compliance | Building Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Residential Buildings for Statewide Compliance Residential Buildings for Statewide Compliance The materials for this course may be used for in-person training courses, and are intended to provide the tools and specific training necessary to evaluate residential compliance with the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC). The course also provides useful training in general residential field inspection for energy code compliance. The recommended background for taking this course is significant experience and/or certification on the IECC in a plan review or inspection capacity. Presenters: Course materials originally published by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program, July 16, 2010. Course Type: Training Materials Video In-person Downloads: Presentation Slides Presentation Slides Presentation Slides and Windows Media Videos

157

Tax compliance in a simulated heterogeneous multi-agent society  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

We consider an individualised approach to agent behaviour in an application to the classical economic problem of tax compliance. Most economic theories consider homogeneous representative agent utilitarian approaches to explain the decision of complying ...

Luis Antunes; Joo Balsa; Paulo Urbano; Luis Moniz; Catarina Roseta-Palma

2005-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

158

Fleet Compliance Results for MY 2011/FY 2012 (Brochure)  

SciTech Connect

This annual report summarizes the compliance results of state and alternative fuel provider fleets covered by the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct) for model year 2011/fiscal year 2012.

Not Available

2013-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

159

DOE/EA-1268: Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 Rev. 0 Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Tuba City Uranium Mill Tailings Site December 1998 Prepared by U.S. Department of Energy Grand Junction Office...

160

Burbank Water and Power SBX1 2 Compliance Plan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and verifying compliance with the RPS. Keywords: Biodiesel, biogas, biomass, biomethane, certificates ........................................................................................................................................ 24 2. Biogas (including pipeline biomethane with the reduction of solid waste and treatment benefits created by the use of biomass or biogas fuels. In addition

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fleet-wide cafe compliance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Transfer and Procurement Energy Policy ARPA-E Laws & Legal Resources Open Government SmartGrid Information The mission of the Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance is to assure...

162

Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program environmental compliance assessment checklists  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of the Environmental Compliance Assessment Program is to assess the compliance of Formerly Utilized Site Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) sites with applicable environmental regulations and Department of Energy (DOE) Orders. The mission is to identify, assess, and decontaminate sites utilized during the 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s to process and store uranium and thorium ores in support of the Manhattan Engineer District and the Atomic Energy Commission. To conduct the FUSRAP environmental compliance assessment, checklists were developed that outline audit procedures to determine the compliance status of the site. The checklists are divided in four groups to correspond to these regulatory areas: Hazardous Waste Management, PCB Management, Air Emissions, and Water Discharges.

Levine, M.B.; Sigmon, C.F.

1989-09-29T23:59:59.000Z

163

Submitting Environmental Impact Statements | Compliance and Enforcement | US EPA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Submitting Environmental Impact Statements | Compliance and Enforcement | US EPA Submitting Environmental Impact Statements | Compliance and Enforcement | US EPA Jump to main content. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Recent Additions | Contact Us Search: All EPA Compliance and Enforcement q You are here: EPA Home q Compliance and Enforcement q National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) q Submitting Environmental Impact Statements Submitting Environmental Impact Statements q Amended EIS Filing System Guidelines (January 2011) q Where to Submit (or "File") an EIS q Filing an EIS--Draft, Final and Supplemental q EIS Filing Procedure for Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP) Events q Notice in the Federal Register q Time Periods Amended EIS Filing System Guidelines (January 2011)

164

Knowledge discovery in corporate email : the compliance bot meets Enron  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

I propose the creation of a real-time compliance "bot" - software to momentarily pause each employee's email at the moment of sending and to electronically assess whether that email is likely to create liability or ...

Waterman, K. Krasnow

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

165

2008 Nonresidential Compliance Forms July 2010 Appendix A  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

)4 NA7.5.8 MECH-10A - Hydronic System Variable Flow Control §125(a)7 & §144(j), §144(j)1 §144(j)5 Certificate of Compliance Envelope Mechanical Lighting Outdoor Lighting Sign Lighting Refrigerated Warehouse-INST 10-103(a)3A Refrigerated Warehouse RWH-INST 10-103(a)3A #12;2008 Nonresidential Compliance Forms July

166

Alternative Compliance: Guidelines for Preparing and Submitting a Waiver Request Application and Other Documentation Requirements (Book)  

SciTech Connect

This document is designed to assist covered fleets interested in taking advantage of more flexible compliance options and to facilitate the transition from Standard Compliance to Alternative Compliance. It is designed to help fleets better understand the Alternative Compliance option and successfully complete the waiver application process.

Sears, T.

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

167

A conceptual model and IS framework for the design and adoption of environmental compliance management systems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Environmental concerns have led to a significant increase in the number and scope of compliance imperatives governing electrical, electronics, and IT products across global regulatory environments. This is, of course, in addition to general compliance ... Keywords: Enterprise systems, Environment, Environmental compliance management systems, Governance, IS framework, IT, Risk and compliance

Tom Butler; Damien Mcgovern

2012-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

168

Alternative Compliance: Guidelines for Preparing and Submitting a Waiver Request Application and Other Documentation Requirements  

SciTech Connect

This document is designed to assist covered fleets interested in taking advantage of more flexible compliance options and to facilitate the transition from Standard Compliance to Alternative Compliance. It is designed to help fleets better understand the Alternative Compliance option and successfully complete the waiver application process.

Not Available

2013-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

169

Alternative Compliance: Guidelines for Preparing and Submitting a Waiver Request Application and Other Documentation Requirements (Book)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document is designed to assist covered fleets interested in taking advantage of more flexible compliance options and to facilitate the transition from Standard Compliance to Alternative Compliance. It is designed to help fleets better understand the Alternative Compliance option and successfully complete the waiver application process.

Not Available

2010-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

170

Check-Testing of Manufacturer Self Reported Labeling Data & Compliance with MEPS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

trends in compliance rates, energy-savings ratings and performance variations between appliance markets.

Zhou, Nan

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

171

Compliance status report for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for the disposition of transuranic (TRU) waste generated through national defense-related activities. Approximately 53,700 m{sup 2} of these wastes have been generated and are currently stored at government defense installations across the country. The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), located in southeastern New Mexico, has been sited and constructed to meet the criteria established by the scientific and regulatory community for the safe, long-term disposal of TRU and TRU-mixed wastes. This Compliance Status Report (CSR) provides an assessment of the progress of the WIPP Program toward compliance with long-term disposal regulations, set forth in Title 40 CFR 191 (EPA, 1993a), Subparts B and C, and Title 40 CFR {section}268.6 (EPA, 1993b), in order to focus on-going and future experimental and engineering activities. The CSR attempts to identify issues associated with the performance of the WIPP as a long-term repository and to focus on the resolution of these issues. This report will serve as a tool to focus project resources on the areas necessary to ensure complete, accurate, and timely submittal of the compliance application. This document is not intended to constitute a statement of compliance or a demonstration of compliance.

Not Available

1994-03-31T23:59:59.000Z

172

ACE Learning Series - Compliance Toolkit | Building Energy Codes Program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Compliance Toolkit Compliance Toolkit The compliance toolkit describes the steps that should be taken by the build community to make sure that their buildings meet the requirements of the energy codes in effect where the buildings are being built and that the building designs are well documented so that the enforcement community can quickly and easily determine if the building meets the requirement of the energy code. This toolkit describes the steps that should be taken by the build community to make sure that their buildings meet the requirements of the energy codes in effect where the buildings are being built and that the building designs are well documented so that the enforcement community can quickly and easily determine if the building meets the requirement of the

173

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Compliance Order, October 6, 1995 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley National Laboratory Agreement Name Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Compliance Order, October 6, 1995 HWCA # 95/96-016 State California Agreement Type Compliance Agreement Legal Driver(s) FFCAct Scope Summary Address LDR requirements pertaining to storage and treatment of covered waste at LBNL Parties DOE; State of California Environmental Protection Agency (Department of Toxic Substances Control) Date 10/6/1995 SCOPE * Address LDR requirements pertaining to storage and treatment of covered waste at LBNL. * Require adherence to the Site Treatment Plan which provides overall schedules for achieving compliance with LDR storage and treatment requirements based on milestones. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * Respondent shall carry out all activities in accordance with the schedules and

174

Contacts for NEPA Policy and Compliance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Us » Contact Us » Contacts for NEPA Policy and Compliance Us » Contact Us » Contacts for NEPA Policy and Compliance Contacts for NEPA Policy and Compliance Carol Borgstrom, Director 202-586-4600 carol.borgstrom@hq.doe.gov Lettie Wormley, Secretary 202-586-4610 lettie.wormley@hq.doe.gov Eric Cohen, Supervisory Environmental Protection Specialist 202-586-7684 eric.cohen@hq.doe.gov Brian Costner, Supervisory Environmental Protection Specialist 202-586-9924 brian.costner@hq.doe.gov James (Jim) Daniel, Supervisory Environmental Protection Specialist 202-586-9760 daniel.james@hq.doe.gov Ralph Barr, Environmental Protection Specialist 202-586-3448 ralph.barr@hq.doe.gov Vivian Bowie, Environmental Protection Specialist 202-586-1771 vivian.bowie@hq.doe.gov Connie Chen, Environmental Protection Specialist 202-586-0733 connie.chen@hq.doe.gov

175

OFFICE OF NEPA POLICY AND COMPLIANCE - STAFF DIRECTORY | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OFFICE OF NEPA POLICY AND COMPLIANCE - STAFF DIRECTORY OFFICE OF NEPA POLICY AND COMPLIANCE - STAFF DIRECTORY OFFICE OF NEPA POLICY AND COMPLIANCE - STAFF DIRECTORY Carol Borgstrom, Director 202-586-4600 Carol.Borgstrom@hq.doe.gov Lettie Wormley, Secretary 202-586-4610 Lettie.Wormley@hq.doe.gov Eastern Energy and Waste Management Unit Contact Program/Responsibility Special Projects or Topics Brian Costner Brian.Costner@hq.doe.gov 202-586-9924 Unit Leader Yardena Mansoor Yardena.Mansoor@hq.doe.gov 202-586-9326 Office of Environmental Management * Oak Ridge Office * Savannah River Operations Office Office of Fossil Energy * Strategic Reserves * Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability * Champlain Hudson Power Express Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration

176

Interaction of Compliance and Voluntary Renewable Energy Markets  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Interaction of Compliance Interaction of Compliance and Voluntary Renewable Energy Markets Lori Bird and Elizabeth Lokey Technical Report NREL/ TP-670-42096 October 2007 NREL is operated by Midwest Research Institute ● Battelle Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 * www.nrel.gov Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by Midwest Research Institute * Battelle Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 Technical Report NREL/ TP-670-42096 October 2007 Interaction of Compliance and Voluntary Renewable Energy Markets Lori Bird and Elizabeth Lokey Prepared under Task No. IGST.7330 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government.

177

ACE Learning Series - Adoption, Compliance, and Enforcement | Building  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Resource Center Resource Center Site Map Printable Version Development Adoption Compliance Regulations Resource Center FAQs Publications Resource Guides eLearning Model Policies Glossary Related Links ACE Learning Series Utility Savings Estimators ACE Learning Series - Adoption, Compliance, and Enforcement ACE Learning Series Buildings account for almost 40% of the energy used in the United States and, as a direct result of that use, our environment and economy are impacted. Building energy codes and standards provide an effective response. The Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) designed the ACE Learning Series for those in the building industry having the greatest potential to influence the adoption of and compliance with building energy codes and standards. The Learning Series consists of:

178

General Atomics Compliance Order, October 6, 1995 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

General Atomics General Atomics Agreement Name General Atomics Compliance Order, October 6, 1995 HWCA 95/96-017 State California Agreement Type Compliance Agreement Legal Driver(s) FFCAct Scope Summary Address LDR requirements pertaining to storage and treatment of covered waste at General Atomics Parties DOE; State of California Environmental Protection Agency (Department of Toxic Substances Control) Date 10/6/1995 SCOPE * Address LDR requirements pertaining to storage and treatment of covered waste at General Atomics. * Require adherence to the Site Treatment Plan which provides overall schedules for achieving compliance with LDR storage and treatment requirements based on milestones. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * Respondent shall carry out all activities in accordance with the schedules and

179

Oak Ridge Reservation Compliance Order, September 26, 1995 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oak Ridge Reservation Compliance Order, September Oak Ridge Reservation Compliance Order, September 26, 1995 State Tennessee Agreement Type Compliance Order Legal Driver(s) FFCAct Scope Summary Enforce the Plan and ensure that the Respondent completes all work in accordance with the schedules contained in, and/or developed pursuant to, the Plan Parties DOE; Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Date 9/26/1995 SCOPE * Approve, with modifications made by TDEC, the "Proposed Site Treatment Plan for the Oak Ridge Reservation," hereafter known as the Plan. * Enforce the Plan and ensure that the Respondent completes all work in accordance with the schedules contained in, and/or developed pursuant to, the Plan. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * Schedules are contained in the Plan.

180

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance Guide, Sandia National Laboratories  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report contains a comprehensive National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance Guide for the Sandia National Laboratories. It is based on the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) NEPA regulations in 40 CFR Parts 1500 through 1508; the US Department of Energy (DOE) N-EPA implementing procedures in 10 CFR Part 102 1; DOE Order 5440.1E; the DOE ``Secretarial Policy Statement on the National Environmental Policy Act`` of June 1994- Sandia NEPA compliance procedures-, and other CEQ and DOE guidance. The Guide includes step-by-step procedures for preparation of Environmental Checklists/Action Descriptions Memoranda (ECL/ADMs), Environmental Assessments (EAs), and Environmental Impact Statements (EISs). It also includes sections on ``Dealing With NEPA Documentation Problems`` and ``Special N-EPA Compliance Issues.``

Hansen, R.P. [Hansen Environmental Consultants, Englewood, CO (United States)

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fleet-wide cafe compliance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Environmental surveillance and compliance at Los Alamos during 1996  

SciTech Connect

This report presents environmental data that characterize environmental performance and addresses compliance with environmental standards and requirements at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL or the Laboratory) during 1996. The Laboratory routinely monitors for radiation and for radioactive nonradioactive materials at Laboratory sites as well as in the surrounding region. LANL uses the monitoring results to determine compliance with appropriate standards and to identify potentially undesirable trends. Data were collected in 1996 to assess external penetrating radiation; quantities of airborne emissions; and concentrations of chemicals and radionuclides in ambient air, surface waters and groundwaters, the municipal water supply, soils and sediments, and foodstuffs. Using comparisons with standards and regulations, this report concludes that environmental effects from Laboratory operations are small and do not pose a demonstrable threat to the public, Laboratory employees, or the environment. Laboratory operations were in compliance with all major environmental regulations.

NONE

1997-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

182

Learning & Development Policy/Compliance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Learning & Development Policy/Compliance Learning & Development Policy/Compliance Learning & Development Policy/Compliance Searching for information on Department and Federal training policy and guidelines? The following websites can be of help: DOE Learning & Development Training Policies and Guidelines On the DOE Directives page you will find the following information: DOE O360.1b Federal Employee Training Order DOE M360.1-1B Federal Employee Training Manual DOE O361.1B Acquisition Career Management Program Office of Personnel Management Federal Government Training Policies and Guidelines Training and Development Policy Training Policy Handbook Training, however, is a program, not just a set of authorities, and works within a context that includes Federal procurement authorities, personnel

183

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Biennial Environmental Compliance Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Biennial Environmental Compliance Report (BECR) documents environmental regulatory compliance at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), a facility designed for the safe disposal of transuranic (TRU) radioactive waste, for the reporting period of April 1, 1998, to March 31, 2000. As required by the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act (LWA)(Public Law [Pub. L.] 102-579, and amended by Pub. L. 104-201), the BECR documents U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Carlsbad Area Office's (hereinafter the ''CAO'') compliance with applicable environmental protection laws and regulations implemented by agencies of the federal government and the state of New Mexico. An issue was identified in the 1998 BECR relating to a potential cross-connection between the fire-water systems and the site domestic water system. While the CAO and its managing and operating contractor (hereinafter the ''MOC'') believe the site was always in compliance with cross-connection control requirements, hardware and procedural upgrades w ere implemented in March 1999 to strengthen its compliance posture. Further discussion of this issue is presented in section 30.2.2 herein. During this reporting period WIPP received two letters and a compliance order alleging violation of certain requirements outlined in section 9(a)(1) of the LWA. With the exception of one item, pending a final decision by the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED), all alleged violations have been resolved without the assessment of fines or penalties. Non-mixed TRU waste shipments began on March 26, 1999. Shipments continued through November 26, 1999, the effective date of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Hazardous Waste Facility Permit (NM4890139088-TSDF). No shipments regulated under the Hazardous Waste Facility Permit were received at WIPP during this BECR reporting period.

Westinghouse TRU Solutions

2000-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

184

Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Program (Mississippi) Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Program (Mississippi) < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Developer Fed. Government Fuel Distributor General Public/Consumer Industrial Installer/Contractor Institutional Investor-Owned Utility Local Government Low-Income Residential Multi-Family Residential Municipal/Public Utility Nonprofit Residential Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative Schools State/Provincial Govt Systems Integrator Transportation Tribal Government Utility Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State

185

A GIS approach to cultural resources management and NEPA compliance  

SciTech Connect

Cultural resources management and historic preservation compliance are best approached within the broader framework of natural resources planning and land management. Argonne National Laboratory is currently assisting federal agencies with the development of computer- based resource management systems for large facilities, and cultural resources management and preservation are components of these systems. In the area of cultural resources, Argonne is using the GIS tool to demonstrate how federal facilities can manage large, complex databases, integrate cultural resource data with other environmental variables, model distributions of resources to aid in inventory and evaluation, link the data to quantitative and impact modes, and effectively manage and monitor resource planning activities and environmental compliance.

Moeller, K.

1996-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

186

Mixed Waste Storage and Treatment: Regulatory Compliance Manual  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The management and storage of mixed wastes represents one of the most challenging regulatory issues currently facing NRC licensees. This report provides instructions and guidance regarding the on-site storage and treatment of mixed waste in compliance with Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) requirements.

1994-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

187

Integrating IT Governance, Risk, and Compliance Management Processes  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Even though the field of Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) has witnessed increased attention over the last years, there is a lack of research on the integrated approach to GRC. This research suggests an integrated process model for high-level IT ...

Nicolas Racz; Edgar Weippl; Andreas Seufert

2011-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

188

Efficient audit-based compliance for relational data retention  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act inspired research on long-term high-integrity retention of business records, leveraging the immutability guarantees that WORM storage servers offer for files. In this paper, we present the transaction log on WORM (TLOW) ... Keywords: audit, forensics, regulatory compliance

Ragib Hasan; Marianne Winslett

2011-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

189

PG&E's Renewable Portfolio Standard & Greenhouse Gas Compliance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

PG&E's Renewable Portfolio Standard & Greenhouse Gas Compliance Fong Wan Senior Vice President. AB32 and Greenhouse Gas Legislation Outline #12;PG&E's Electric Generation Portfolio *Note: Other" for the purpose of this slide RPS BINDER 1.3 #12;AB32 & Greenhouse Gas Overview · AB32 signed into law

190

Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research Compliance Order, October 6, 1995  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Energy-Related Health Research (LEHR) Compliance Order, October 6, 1.. Page 1 of 11 for Energy-Related Health Research (LEHR) Compliance Order, October 6, 1.. Page 1 of 11 EM Home | Regulatory Compliance | Environmental Compliance Agreements Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research (LEHR) Compliance Order, October 6, 1995 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL _________________________________ In the Matter of: LABORATORY FOR ENERGY-RELATED HEALTH RESEARCH (LEHR). HWCA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, Respondent. ) ) ) COMPLIANCE ORDER ) 95/96 -020 ) ) ) ) _________________________________) FEDERAL FACILITY COMPLIANCE ACT ORDER FOR THE LABORATORY FOR ENERGY-RELATED HEALTH RESEARCH (LEHR) This Order is issued by the California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) to require compliance by the United States Department of Energy (DOE)

191

Report on Inspection of Compliance With DOE Order 2030.4B at...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Report on Inspection of Compliance With DOE Order 2030.4B at the Savannah River Site, INS-9702 Report on Inspection of Compliance With DOE Order 2030.4B at the Savannah River Site,...

192

Canister storage building compliance assessment DOE Order 6430.1A, General Design Criteria  

SciTech Connect

This document presents the Project's position on compliance with DOE Order 6430.1A ''General Design Criteria.'' No non-compliances are shown. The compliance statements have been reviewed and approved by DOE. Open items are scheduled to be closed prior to project completion.

BLACK, D.M.

1999-08-12T23:59:59.000Z

193

Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance NEPA Requirements and Guidance - Search Index Quickly search through 100+ NEPA requirements and guidance documents to find information on NEPA topics. Read more DOE NEPA Projects Currently Open for Public Comment Find how to comment on DOE NEPA documents in an area of interest. Read more NEPA Success Stories from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports This compilation describes DOE NEPA reviews that resulted in better planning, enhanced public participation, and protection of sensitive environmental resources. Read more Latest Documents & Notices January 10, 2014 EIS-0488: FERC Draft Environmental Impact Statement Cameron Pipeline Expansion Project and Cameron LNG Liquefaction Project, Cameron Parish, Louisiana January 10, 2014

194

Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance NEPA Requirements and Guidance - Search Index Quickly search through 100+ NEPA requirements and guidance documents to find information on NEPA topics. Read more DOE NEPA Projects Currently Open for Public Comment Find how to comment on DOE NEPA documents in an area of interest. Read more NEPA Success Stories from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports This compilation describes DOE NEPA reviews that resulted in better planning, enhanced public participation, and protection of sensitive environmental resources. Read more Latest Documents & Notices January 17, 2014 EIS-0488: EPA Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement Cameron Liquefaction Project, Cameron Parish, Louisiana January 15, 2014 EIS-0460: Record of Decision

195

Federal Energy Management Program: EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data EISA 432 Overview EISA requires Federal agencies to identify "covered facilities" that constitute at least 75% of their total facility energy use as subject to the requirements of the statute. Each Federal agency must designate an energy manager responsible for implementing the requirements at each covered facility. Comprehensive energy and water evaluations are to be performed at each covered facility every four years to identify potential energy and water efficiency and conservation measures. EISA requires agencies to report progress toward these requirements in CTS, along with: Estimated cost and savings for projects implemented in covered facilities Measured savings for implemented projects

196

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY Project Information Project Title: Liner Drilling Date:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Liner Drilling Date: Liner Drilling Date: 4-5-10 DOE Code: 71092 Cont ractor Code: 8067-766 Project Lead: Frank Ingham Project Overview Nothing out of the ordinary for drilling an existing location 1. What are the environmental impacts? NE SW Sec 21 , T39N, R78W (45-3-X-21 well) 2. What is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? Approximately a week 4 . What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, Drilling Rig etc.)? Will Drill out of 9 5/8 caslng with liner drillng assembly. After drilling approximately 750 to 1000 ft, will test liner hanging assembly set and retrieve multiple times. The table b elow is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialis t and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey a

197

Renewable Energy Requirements for Future Building Codes: Options for Compliance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

As the model energy codes are improved to reach efficiency levels 50 percent greater than current codes, use of on-site renewable energy generation is likely to become a code requirement. This requirement will be needed because traditional mechanisms for code improvement, including envelope, mechanical and lighting, have been pressed to the end of reasonable limits. Research has been conducted to determine the mechanism for implementing this requirement (Kaufman 2011). Kaufmann et al. determined that the most appropriate way to structure an on-site renewable requirement for commercial buildings is to define the requirement in terms of an installed power density per unit of roof area. This provides a mechanism that is suitable for the installation of photovoltaic (PV) systems on future buildings to offset electricity and reduce the total building energy load. Kaufmann et al. suggested that an appropriate maximum for the requirement in the commercial sector would be 4 W/ft{sup 2} of roof area or 0.5 W/ft{sup 2} of conditioned floor area. As with all code requirements, there must be an alternative compliance path for buildings that may not reasonably meet the renewables requirement. This might include conditions like shading (which makes rooftop PV arrays less effective), unusual architecture, undesirable roof pitch, unsuitable building orientation, or other issues. In the short term, alternative compliance paths including high performance mechanical equipment, dramatic envelope changes, or controls changes may be feasible. These options may be less expensive than many renewable systems, which will require careful balance of energy measures when setting the code requirement levels. As the stringency of the code continues to increase however, efficiency trade-offs will be maximized, requiring alternative compliance options to be focused solely on renewable electricity trade-offs or equivalent programs. One alternate compliance path includes purchase of Renewable Energy Credits (RECs). Each REC represents a specified amount of renewable electricity production and provides an offset of environmental externalities associated with non-renewable electricity production. The purpose of this paper is to explore the possible issues with RECs and comparable alternative compliance options. Existing codes have been examined to determine energy equivalence between the energy generation requirement and the RECs alternative over the life of the building. The price equivalence of the requirement and the alternative are determined to consider the economic drivers for a market decision. This research includes case studies that review how the few existing codes have incorporated RECs and some of the issues inherent with REC markets. Section 1 of the report reviews compliance options including RECs, green energy purchase programs, shared solar agreements and leases, and other options. Section 2 provides detailed case studies on codes that include RECs and community based alternative compliance methods. The methods the existing code requirements structure alternative compliance options like RECs are the focus of the case studies. Section 3 explores the possible structure of the renewable energy generation requirement in the context of energy and price equivalence. The price of RECs have shown high variation by market and over time which makes it critical to for code language to be updated frequently for a renewable energy generation requirement or the requirement will not remain price-equivalent over time. Section 4 of the report provides a maximum case estimate for impact to the PV market and the REC market based on the Kaufmann et al. proposed requirement levels. If all new buildings in the commercial sector complied with the requirement to install rooftop PV arrays, nearly 4,700 MW of solar would be installed in 2012, a major increase from EIA estimates of 640 MW of solar generation capacity installed in 2009. The residential sector could contribute roughly an additional 2,300 MW based on the same code requirement levels of 4 W/ft{sup 2} of r

Dillon, Heather E.; Antonopoulos, Chrissi A.; Solana, Amy E.; Russo, Bryan J.

2011-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

198

Compliance Order issued to Los Alamos National Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

12,2007 12,2007 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Dr. Michael T. Anastasio Laboratory Director Los Alamos National Laboratory MS-A1 00 SM-30, Bikini Atoll Road Los Alamos, NM 87545 Dear Dr. Anastasio: Pursuant to the authority of the Secretary of Energy under section 234B of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and 10 C.F.R. 5 824.4(b) of the Department's Procedural Rules for the Assessment of Civil Penalties for Classzjied Information Security Violations, I am today issuing the enclosed Compliance Order to Los Alamos National Security, LLC (LANS). The Compliance Order directs LANS to implement specific corrective actions to remediate both the laboratory management deficiencies that contributed to the thumb drive security incident at Los Alarnos National Laboratory (LANL) discovered in

199

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Biennial Environmental Compliance Report  

SciTech Connect

This Biennial Environmental Compliance Report (BECR) documents environmental regulatory compliance at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), a facility designed for the safe disposal of transuranic (TRU) radioactive waste, for the reporting period of April 1, 2000, to March 31, 2002. As required by the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act (LWA)(Public Law [Pub. L.] 102-579, as amended by Pub. L. 104-201), the BECR documents U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Carlsbad Field Office's (CBFO) compliance with applicable environmental protection laws and regulations implemented by agencies of the federal government and the state of New Mexico. In the prior BECR, the CBFO and the management and operating contractor (MOC)committed to discuss resolution of a Letter of Violation that had been issued by the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) in August 1999, which was during the previous BECR reporting period. This Letter of Violation alleged noncompliance with hazardous waste aisle spacing, labeling, a nd tank requirements. At the time of publication of the prior BECR, resolution of the Letter of Violation was pending. On July 7, 2000, the NMED issued a letter noting that the aisle spacing and labeling concerns had been adequately addressed and that they were rescinding the violation alleging that the Exhaust Shaft Catch Basin failed to comply with the requirements for a hazardous waste tank. During the current reporting period, WIPP received a Notice of Violation and a compliance order alleging the violation of the New Mexico Hazardous Waste Regulations and the WIPP Hazardous Waste Facility Permit (HWFP).

Washinton TRU Solutions LLC

2002-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

200

300 Area TEDF NPDES Permit Compliance Monitoring Plan  

SciTech Connect

This monitoring plan describes the activities and methods that will be employed at the 300 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility (TEDF) in order to ensure compliance with the National Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. Included in this document are a brief description of the project, the specifics of the sampling effort, including the physical location and frequency of sampling, the support required for sampling, and the Quality Assurance (QA) protocols to be followed in the sampling procedures.

Loll, C.M.

1994-10-13T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fleet-wide cafe compliance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

EIA - AEO2010 - CAFE standards  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

economy requirement of 34.1 mpg by 2016. Because the CO2-equivalent standards cover all vehicle emissions related to GHGs, manufacturers who do not implement technologies that...

202

Emissions trading and compliance: Regulatory incentives and barriers  

SciTech Connect

The Title IV of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (P.L. 101-549) authorizes the use of transferable emission allowances to achieve reductions in the power generating industry's SO{sub 2} emissions at a minimum possible cost. All electricity generators (greater than 25 MW) are required to hold emissions allowances equal to the amount (tons) of SO{sub 2} emitted during a given year, and meet NO{sub x} reduction levels indicated by the Revised New Source Performance Standards (NSPS). This paper will examine the multifaceted goals and problems of states and utilities relative to compliance with Title IV, and in particular as they pertain to the development and functioning of the allowance market together with utility pollution control and power generation technology choice. Section 2 presents possible utility compliance strategies along with possible barriers that utilities may confront regarding the development of a SO{sub 2} allowance market. Section 3 discusses current regulatory barriers and requirements being implemented by state public utility commissions, and Section 4 offers some policy recommendations to achieve the goals of Title IV. Finally, Section 5 presents a summary and conclusions; Appendix A provides programs/mandates developed to data by high sulfur coal states in response to Title IV compliance requirements.

South, D.W.; Bailey, K.A. (Argonne National Lab., IL (United States)); McDermott, K.A. (Illinois State Univ., Normal, IL (United States). Center for Regulatory Studies)

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

203

Emissions trading and compliance: Regulatory incentives and barriers  

SciTech Connect

The Title IV of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (P.L. 101-549) authorizes the use of transferable emission allowances to achieve reductions in the power generating industry`s SO{sub 2} emissions at a minimum possible cost. All electricity generators (greater than 25 MW) are required to hold emissions allowances equal to the amount (tons) of SO{sub 2} emitted during a given year, and meet NO{sub x} reduction levels indicated by the Revised New Source Performance Standards (NSPS). This paper will examine the multifaceted goals and problems of states and utilities relative to compliance with Title IV, and in particular as they pertain to the development and functioning of the allowance market together with utility pollution control and power generation technology choice. Section 2 presents possible utility compliance strategies along with possible barriers that utilities may confront regarding the development of a SO{sub 2} allowance market. Section 3 discusses current regulatory barriers and requirements being implemented by state public utility commissions, and Section 4 offers some policy recommendations to achieve the goals of Title IV. Finally, Section 5 presents a summary and conclusions; Appendix A provides programs/mandates developed to data by high sulfur coal states in response to Title IV compliance requirements.

South, D.W.; Bailey, K.A. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States); McDermott, K.A. [Illinois State Univ., Normal, IL (United States). Center for Regulatory Studies

1992-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

204

Incentive mechanisms as a strategic option for acid rain compliance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Title IV of the Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) of 1990 (P.L. 101--549) establishes the use of flexible emission compliance strategies for electric utilities to reduce the emissions of add precursors (SO{sub 2}, NO{sub 2}). To control SO{sub 2} emissions, tradeable emission allowances will be used; NO{sub 2} emissions will be controlled by an emission standard, but a utility is permitted to average NO{sub 2} emissions systemwide to meet the standard. Both of these policies promote flexibility and cost savings for the utility while achieving the prescribed emission reduction goals of P.L. 101--549. The use of SO{sub 2} emission allowances has two notable benefits: A utility has the choice of a wide range of compliance methods allowing it to minimize compliance costs and second; the use of transferable emission allowances promote technological innovation with respect to emissions reduction/control. This report discusses the use of regulatory incentives towards the achievement of a Title IV goal of cost reduction of SO{sub 2} emissions.

South, D.W.; Bailey, K.A.; McDermott, K.A.

1991-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

205

Incentive mechanisms as a strategic option for acid rain compliance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Title IV of the Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) of 1990 (P.L. 101--549) establishes the use of flexible emission compliance strategies for electric utilities to reduce the emissions of add precursors (SO[sub 2], NO[sub 2]). To control SO[sub 2] emissions, tradeable emission allowances will be used; NO[sub 2] emissions will be controlled by an emission standard, but a utility is permitted to average NO[sub 2] emissions systemwide to meet the standard. Both of these policies promote flexibility and cost savings for the utility while achieving the prescribed emission reduction goals of P.L. 101--549. The use of SO[sub 2] emission allowances has two notable benefits: A utility has the choice of a wide range of compliance methods allowing it to minimize compliance costs and second; the use of transferable emission allowances promote technological innovation with respect to emissions reduction/control. This report discusses the use of regulatory incentives towards the achievement of a Title IV goal of cost reduction of SO[sub 2] emissions.

South, D.W.; Bailey, K.A.; McDermott, K.A.

1991-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

206

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Biennial Environmental Compliance Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Biennial Environmental Compliance Report (BECR) documents compliance with environmental regulations at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), a facility designed and authorized for the safe disposal of transuranic (TRU) radioactive waste. This BECR covers the reporting period from April 1, 2004, to March 31, 2006. As required by the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act (LWA) (Public Law [Pub. L.] 102-579, as amended by Pub. L. 104-201), the BECR documents United States (U.S.) Department of Energy (DOE) compliance with regulations and permits issued pursuant to the following: (1) Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 191, Subpart A, "Environmental Standards for Management and Storage"; (2) Clean Air Act (CAA) (42 United States Code [U.S.C.] 7401, et seq.); (3) Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA) (42 U.S.C. 6901-6992, et seq.); (4) Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) (42 U.S.C. 300f, et seq.); (5) Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) (15 U.S.C. 2601, et seq.); (6) Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. 9601, et seq.); and all other federal and state of New Mexico laws pertaining to public health and safety or the environment.

Washington Regulatory and Environmental Services

2006-10-12T23:59:59.000Z

207

File:Cert Compliance inst 0110.pdf | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Cert Compliance inst 0110.pdf Cert Compliance inst 0110.pdf Jump to: navigation, search File File history File usage File:Cert Compliance inst 0110.pdf Size of this preview: 463 × 599 pixels. Other resolution: 464 × 600 pixels. Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 Go! next page → next page → Full resolution ‎(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 90 KB, MIME type: application/pdf, 5 pages) File history Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time. Date/Time Thumbnail Dimensions User Comment current 17:26, 13 November 2012 Thumbnail for version as of 17:26, 13 November 2012 1,275 × 1,650, 5 pages (90 KB) Dklein2012 (Talk | contribs) You cannot overwrite this file. Edit this file using an external application (See the setup instructions for more information) File usage There are no pages that link to this file.

208

Federal Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August 8, 1996  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August.. Page 1 of 18 Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August.. Page 1 of 18 EM Home | Regulatory Compliance | Environmental Compliance Agreements Federal Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August 8, 1996 NOTE: As of December 16, 1996, for the Oak Ridge Reservation this National Agreement was superseded by the Oak Ridge Reservation Polychlorinated Biphenyl Federal Facilities Compliance Agreement (ORR-PCB-FFCA). The ORR-PCB-FFCA will be available soon. Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Definitions III. Covered Materials IV. Statement of Facts & Conclusions of Law V. Compliance Requirements VI. Submittal and Review of Annual Status Report VII. Notification VIII. Dispute Resolution IX. Extensions

209

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Recipien, ..ounty of Westmoreland, PA ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Energy Efficiency & Conservation Programs for Buildings & Facilities All County Building Energy Audits A9 Energy Efficiency Retrofits B5.1 Waste Stream, Engineering, and Historical Preservation clauses. Energy Efficiency & Conservation Strategy A9, All, B5.1 Allowable: Any administrative actions/audits associated with this activity Prohibited: Any implantation of projects/construction activities without NEPA approval from DOE Renewable Energy Technologies on Government Buildings B5.1 Allowable: Any administrative actions/audits

210

Microsoft Word - FedComplianceCritChecklist.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Balanced Scorecard Balanced Scorecard Federal Compliance Review Criteria Acquisition & Financial Assistance Self-Assessment Checklist Revised: May 2008 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Contract Management Office of Procurement & Assistance Management INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE OF THE CHECKLIST The Procurement Executive of the Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for establishing an effective acquisition and financial assistance management system which ensures that quality goods and services are obtained at reasonable prices, in a timely fashion, and in accordance with the statutory and regulatory requirements and the programmatic needs of the agency. To assist in the accomplishment of this responsibility, the Procurement Executive has established the

211

Maximally exposed offsite individual location determination for NESHAPS compliance  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires the use of the computer program CAP88 for demonstrating compliance with the National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS.) One of the inputs required for CAP88 is the location of the maximally exposed individual (MEI) by sector and distance. Distances to the MEI have been determined for 15 different potential release locations at SRS. These locations were compared with previous work and differences were analyzed. Additionally, SREL Conference Center was included as a potential offsite location since in the future it may be used as a dormitory. Worst sectors were then determined based on the distances.

Simpkins, A.A.

2000-03-13T23:59:59.000Z

212

Formal hardware specification languages for protocol compliance verification  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The advent of the system-on-chip and intellectual property hardware design paradigms makes protocol compliance verification increasingly important to the success of a project. One of the central tools in any verification project is the modeling language, ... Keywords: Esterel, Heterogeneous Hardware Logic, Hierarchical Annotated Action Diagrams, Java, Lava, Live Sequence Charts, Message Sequence Charts, Objective VHDL, OpenVera, Property Specification Language, SpecC, Specification and Description Language, Statecharts, SystemC, SystemVerilog, The Unified Modeling Language, e, hardware monitors, timing diagrams

Annette Bunker; Ganesh Gopalakrishnan; Sally A. Mckee

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

213

DOE directives: Improving contractor review and compliance systems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Department of Energy contractors are regulated by DOE directives. Rigorous and effective contractor administrative systems to review directives and document compliance are essential. WINCO recognized the need to improve its directives review system. Three areas have been addressed: Computerized tracking, documentation of the review itself--at the requirement rather then the directive level, and the role of the directives administrator. The result is a system that generates and captures information for use in the company rather than simply creating files and that attest to work accomplished.

Airmet, D.

1990-05-07T23:59:59.000Z

214

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Federal Facility Compliance Order, February 24, 1997 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Facility Compliance Act Order for Lawrence Federal Facility Compliance Act Order for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Compliance Order HWCA 96/97-5002 State California Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) FFCAct Scope Summary Require compliance by the DOE with a Site Treatment Plan for the treatment of mixed waste at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Parties DOE; State of California Environmental Protection Agency (Department of Toxic Substances Control) Date 2/24/1997 SCOPE * Require compliance by the DOE with a Site Treatment Plan for the treatment of mixed waste at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. * Address LDR requirements pertaining to storage and treatment of covered waste at LLNL. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * The Compliance Plan Volume of the STP provides overall schedules for achieving

215

Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research Compliance Order, October 6, 1995 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy-Related Health Research Energy-Related Health Research Agreement Name Federal Facility Compliance Act Order for the Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research (LEHR) Compliance Order HWCA # 95/96-020 State California Agreement Type Compliance Order Legal Driver(s) FFCAct Scope Summary Require compliance by the DOE with a Site Treatment Plan for the treatment of mixed waste at the Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research Parties DOE; State of California Environmental Protection Agency (Department of Toxic Substances Control) Date 10/6/1995 SCOPE * Require compliance by the DOE with a Site Treatment Plan for the treatment of mixed waste at the Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * The Compliance Plan Volume of the STP provides overall schedules for achieving

216

TOPIC Brief BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM Choosing an Energy Code Compliance Path TOPIC BRIEF 1  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Choosing an Energy Code Compliance Path TOPIC BRIEF 1 Choosing an Energy Code Compliance Path TOPIC BRIEF 1 Choosing an Energy Code Compliance Path One challenge that awaits any building designer is choosing the appropriate compliance path through the applicable building energy code. This is not a trivial decision-energy codes are marvels of flexibility, offering multiple compliance paths to suit all types of designers. E ach path has its own pluses and minuses, which may include differences in stringency, complexity, and potentially even limitations on building designs. This topic brief focuses on the compliance paths that are available in the following model codes and standards: * 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) and 2012

217

Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, LLC in Compliance with Order No.  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, LLC in Compliance with Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, LLC in Compliance with Order No. 202-05-03 Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, LLC in Compliance with Order No. 202-05-03 Docket No. EO-05-01: Attached is the Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, LLC, which is being submitted in compliance with Order No. 202-05-03, issued by the Department of Energy on December 20, 2005, in the captioned proceeding. Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, LLC in Compliance with Order No. 202-05-03 More Documents & Publications Supplement Number 1 to Operating Plan of Mirnat Potomac River, LLC in Compliance with Order No. 202-05-03 Re: Potomac River Generating Station Department of Energy Case No. EO-05-01: Advanced Notice of Power Outages. Docket No. EO-05-01: Further Notice of 230kV Circuit Planned Outages

218

EO 12088: Federal Compliance with Pollution Control Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

088-Federal Compliance with Pollution Control Standards 088-Federal Compliance with Pollution Control Standards SOURCE: The provisions of Executive Order 12088 of October 13,1978, appear at 43 FR 47707, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 243, unless otherwise noted. By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and statutes of the United States of America, including Section 22 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2621), Section 313 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1323), Section 1447 of the Public Health Service Act, as amended by the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300j-6), Section 118of the Clean Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 7418(b)), Section 4 of the Noise Control Act of 1972 (42 U.S.C. 4903), Section 6001 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6961), and Section 301 of Title 3 of the United

219

Environmental Compliance and Protection Program Description Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

SciTech Connect

The objective of the Environmental Compliance and Protection (EC and P) Program Description (PD) is to establish minimum environmental compliance requirements and natural resources protection goals for the Bechtel Jacobs Company LLC (BJC) Oak Ridge Environmental Management Cleanup Contract (EMCC) Contract Number DE-AC05-98OR22700-M198. This PD establishes the work practices necessary to ensure protection of the environment during the performance of EMCC work activities on the US Department of Energy's (DOE's) Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, by BJC employees and subcontractor personnel. Both BJC and subcontractor personnel are required to implement this PD. A majority of the decontamination and demolition (D and D) activities and media (e.g., soil and groundwater) remediation response actions at DOE sites on the ORR are conducted under the authority of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). CERCLA activities are governed by individual CERCLA decision documents (e.g., Record of Decision [ROD] or Action Memorandum) and according to requirements stated in the Federal Facility Agreement for the Oak Ridge Reservation (DOE 1992). Applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs) for the selected remedy are the requirements for environmental remediation responses (e.g., removal actions and remedial actions) conducted under CERCLA.

Bechtel Jacobs

2009-02-26T23:59:59.000Z

220

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance at Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico (SNL/NM)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report on National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance at Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico (SNL/NM) chronicles past and current compliance activities and includes a recommended strategy that can be implemented for continued improvement. This report provides a list of important references. Attachment 1 contains the table of contents for SAND95-1648, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance Guide Sandia National Laboratories (Hansen, 1995). Attachment 2 contains a list of published environmental assessments (EAs) and environmental impact statements (EISs) prepared by SNL/NM. Attachment 3 contains abstracts of NEPA compliance papers authored by SNL/NM and its contractors.

Wolff, T.A. [Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States). Community Involvement and Issues Management Dept.; Hansen, R.P. [Hansen Environmental Consultants, Englewood, CO (United States)

1998-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fleet-wide cafe compliance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Evaluation of the Cask Transportation Facility Modifications (CTFM) compliance to DOE order 6430.1A  

SciTech Connect

This report was prepared to evaluate the compliance of Cask Transportation Facility Modifications (CTFM) to DOE Order 6430.1A.

ARD, K.E.

1999-07-14T23:59:59.000Z

222

EA-1406: Ground Water Compliance at the New Rifle, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site, Rifle, Colorado  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This EA evaluates the environmental impacts for the proposed compliance strategy of natural flushing combined with institutional controls and continued monitoring for the New Rifle uranium mill...

223

EPAct Alternative Fuel Transportation Program: State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleet Compliance Annual Report, Fleet Compliance Results for MY 2009/FY 2010 (Brochure)  

SciTech Connect

This annual report summarizes the compliance results of state and alternative fuel provider fleets covered by the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct) for model year 2009/fiscal year 2010.

Not Available

2010-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

224

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

685 685 Recipier -ounty of Clark ., NV ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Comprehensive Building A9 This NEPA determination is limited to Energy audits and Energy All conducting audits/compiling the results of Conservation Measures B5.1 the audits/and making recommendations and the installation of an energy software system and real-time energy meters only. Building Energy Retro fits B2.5 Waste Stream Clause B5.1 Historic Preservation Clause Engineering clause *This NEPA determination is limited to retrofits and EE activities on existing buildings only. RE activities are prohibited pending further NEPA review. 2 30kw Solar power arrays at

225

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Recipient: County of Clark ) 114.4- ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) County property biomass A9, All This NEPA determination is limited to conducting audits, studies, outreach and education only. Solar installation B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Historic Preservation Clause Engineering Clause Recycle cart promotion program A9, All, B5.1 Waste Stream Clause should be applied to replacement of old bins. Residential and commercial conservation A9, All This NEPA determination is limited to conducting audits, studies, outreach and education only. LED replacement for Traffic Signals B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Smart Powerstrips

226

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Recipient. _aunty of Montgomery, MD ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Home Energy Loan Program Fully Conditioned This activity is not ready for NEPA review. The loan program is still under development by the recipient and should be reviewed when the details of the program have been finalized by the recipient. Energy Conservation & Renewable Energy in County Buildings A9 This CX applies to Energy Scoping Studies, Measurement and Verification and Program Administration tasks only. All ECM/REM Funding and Buy-Down tasks are subject to further NEPA review when specific tasks have been determined by the recipient.

227

Project Title: DOE Code: Project Lead: NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Code: DOE Code: Project Lead: NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY # 258 Project lnfonnation Rewire electrical to pole at 77SHX10 Mike Preston Date: 11-19-09 Contractor Code: Project Overview No~ rea has been previously disturbed. The trenching will be th,ugh pre-existing right of way for the 1. What are the environmental ~ ~=~d ~ impacts? 2. What is the legal location? Repair a~ replacement of electrical lines to the Pole next to well at 77S~1 0. This will require trenching 3. What is the duration of the project? across the road a~ to the pole. Removing old lines and replacement of lines. 4. What major equipment will be used if any (wor1< over rig, drilling rig, 1 day etc.)? Back hole The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

228

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

12 Recipient: County of Hidalgo, Texas 12 Recipient: County of Hidalgo, Texas ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Categorical Exclusion Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Activity 1 - Sunset Park 85.1 Waste St ream Clause Efficient Ught Project **This NEPA determination applies to the LED light project only. Activity 2 - Hidalgo County, 85.1 Waste Stream Clause Pct 2 Multipurpose Building Historic Preservation Clause Renewable Energy Engineering Clause Component Activity 3 - Solar Power 85.1 Waste Stream Clause Retrofit of Multi-Purpose Historic Preservation Clause Facilities Engineering Clause Activity 4 - Energy Efficiency 85.1 Waste Stream Clause and Conservation Through Historic Preservation Clause

229

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

068 068 Re ent: City of Reno, NV ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Reno Interior Energy Efficiency Retrofits; Reno Exterior Energy Efficiency Retrofits; Reno Solar Onsite Renewable Energy; Reno Wind Onsite Renewable Energy 83.1, B5.1 Waste Stream, Historical Preservation, and Engineering Clauses Wind Turbines Only: Allowable: Any administrative actions/audits associated with this activity. Prohibited: Any implementation of projects/construction activity without NEPA approval from DOE Design and Size of the wind turbines needs to be supplied to DOE for NEPA Analysis. Additional Comments: Design and Size of the wind turbines needs to be supplied to DOE for NEPA

230

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Recipient: county of Monterey, CA ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Retrofit on and off road vehicles with diesel particulate trap filters B5.1 Waste Stream clause Installation of PV system to Serve County of Monterey Laurel Yard Facilities A9, All This activity is conditioned pending further NEPA review. Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Tracking System A9, All None. EE Ordinance and Incentive Development A9, All None. Investment Grade Energy Audit for County Facilities A9, All, B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Historic Preservation Clause Engineering Clause Public EE Education Program A9, All None. Additional Comments: Based on my review of information conveyed to me and in my possession (or attached) concerning the

231

OFFICE OF NEPA POLICY AND COMPLIANCE (EH-42)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revision: January 24, 2012 Revision: January 24, 2012 OFFICE OF NEPA POLICY AND COMPLIANCE (GC-54) Forrestal Building, Room 3E-080 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Phone: 202-586-4600 Fax: 202-586-7031 Website: http://energy.gov/nepa/ Phone (202-58X-) Usual Assignments Email: firstname.lastname@hq.doe.gov Carol Borgstrom 6-4600 Director Lettie Wormley 6-4610 Secretary Eastern Energy and Waste Management Unit Brian Costner 6-9924 Unit Leader (Recovery Act Lead, Surplus Plutonium Disposition SEIS) Connie Chen 6-0733 OE, NEPA Stakeholders Directory, 10 CFR Part 1022 Yardena Mansoor 6-9326 EM (Oak Ridge, Savannah River Site), FE (Strategic Petroleum Reserve), OE, Western Area Power Administration, Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, Property

232

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0847 0847 Recipient: City of .viadison, WI ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) LED Street Lights B2.5 B5.1 Waste Stream Clause *Replacement of existing fixtures to EE lighting. Anaerobic Food Waste Digester - Pilot Study A9 All C12 *This NEPA determination is limited to conducting the waste stream study, feasibility study and preliminary engineering for an Anaerobic Food Waste Digester facility only. *Recipient needs to provide technical and site specific information for this activity. *Allowable: Any administrative actions associated with this activity. Prohibited: Any implementation of projects/construction activities without

233

Directory of certificates of compliance for radioactive materials packages  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this directory is to make available a convenient source of information on packagings approved by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. To assist in identifying packaging, an index by Model Number and corresponding Certificate of Compliance Number is included at the front of Volumes 1 and 2. An alphabetical listing by user name is included in the back of Volume 3 for approved Quality Assurance programs. The reports include a listing of all users of each package design and approved Quality Assurance programs prior to the publication date of the directory. Comments to make future revisions of this directory more useful are invited and should be directed to the Spent Fuel Project Office, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

NONE

1997-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

234

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

726 726 Recipien, _ity of Wichita, KS ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewers Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Century II Cardboard Recycling B5.1 None Occupancy Sensors for Lighting Controls for City Hall B5.1 Waste stream, Historic Preservation and engineering clauses. Energy efficient chiller and cooling tower for Environmental Services building B5.1 Waste stream, historical preservation, engineering clauses. New equipment cannot result in a net increase in air emissions. Comprehensive Community Energy Efficiency & Air Emissions Program A9, All, B5.1 All administrative activities, audits, outreach, and technical advice should be CX'd. All EE activities are subject to the

235

Fleet Compliance Results for MY 2010/FY 2011, EPAct Alternative Fuel Transportation Program: State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleet Compliance Annual Report (Brochure)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This annual report summarizes the compliance results of state and alternative fuel provider fleets covered by the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct) for model year 2010/fiscal year 2011. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) regulates covered state and alternative fuel provider (SFP) fleets under the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct), as amended. For model year (MY) 2010, the compliance rate for the 2911 covered SFP fleets was 100%. Fleets used either Standard Compliance or Alternative Compliance. The 279 fleets that used Standard Compliance exceeded their aggregate MY 2010 acquisition requirements by 61%. The 12 covered fleets that complied using Alternative Compliance exceeded their aggregate MY 2010 petroleum-use-reduction requirements by 89%. Overall, DOE saw modest decreases from MY 2009 in biodiesel fuel use credits earned and in the number of light-duty vehicles (LDVs) acquired. Compared to years before MY 2009, these rates were far lower. Because covered fleets acquired fewer new vehicles overall in MY 2010, the requirement for alternative fuel vehicles (AFVs), which is proportional to new acquisitions, also dropped.

Not Available

2012-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

236

Sign Lighting Overview Page 7-1 2008 Nonresidential Compliance Manual July 2010  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

prescriptive compliance options: Specific technology and watts per square foot approaches. The watt per square). There are no performance compliance options available for sign lighting. Table 7-1 below summarizes the watts per square feasible and cost effective. They set minimum control requirements, maximum allowable power levels

237

Operational Compliance Levers, Environmental Performance, and Firm Performance Under Cap and Trade Regulation  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Cap and trade programs impose limits on industry emissions but offer individual firms the flexibility to choose among different operational levers toward compliance, including inputs, process changes, and the use of allowances to account for emissions. ... Keywords: cap and trade, empirical research, environmental compliance, environmental operations, public policy

James Kroes; Ravi Subramanian; Ramanath Subramanyam

2012-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

238

RTS - an integrated analytic solution for managing regulation changes and their impact on business compliance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Governance, Risk Management and Compliance are key success factors for corporations. Every company worldwide must ensure a proper compliance level with current and future laws and regulations, but managing the dynamic nature of the regulatory environment ... Keywords: document processing, question answering, semantic, text analytics

Davide Pasetto; Hubertus Franke; Weihong Qian; Zhili Guo; Honglei Guo; Dongxu Duan; Yuan Ni; Yingxin Pan; Shenghua Bao; Feng Cao; Zhong Su

2013-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

239

Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site Treatment Plan Compliance Order, October 3, 1995 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Order Requiring Compliance with Site Treatment Plan Order Requiring Compliance with Site Treatment Plan No. 95-10-03-01 State Colorado Agreement Type Consent Order Legal Driver(s) FFCAct Scope Summary Approve with modifications the Proposed Site Treatment Plan for RFETS (MLLW); establish a Mixed Transuranic waste Agreement Parties DOE; Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) Date 10/3/1995 SCOPE * In regard to Mixed Low-Level waste, approve with modifications the Proposed Site Treatment Plan for RFETS and require compliance by DOE with the modified and approved Site Treatment Plan. * In regard to Mixed Transuranic waste, establish and ensure compliance with an Agreement addressing compliance with the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 to RCRA. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES

240

The Oak Ridge Reservation PCB Federal Facilities Compliance Agreement, October 28, 1996 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Compliance Agreement Between The United States Compliance Agreement Between The United States Department of Energy and The United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 - Toxic Substances Control Act (Also Known As The Oak Ridge Reservation Polychlorinated Biphenyl Federal Facilities Compliance Agreement (ORR-PCB-FFCA)) State Tennessee Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) TSCA Scope Summary Bring DOE's Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) into compliance with TSCA and its implementing regulations at 40 CFR Part 761, "Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Manufacturing, Processing, Distribution in Commerce, and Use Prohibitions" Parties DOE; US EPA Date 10/28/1996 SCOPE * Bring DOE's Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) into compliance with TSCA and its implementing regulations at 40 CFR Part 761, "Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fleet-wide cafe compliance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Arçelik A.Ş: Compliance Determination (2010-SE-0105) | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Arçelik A.Ş: Compliance Determination (2010-SE-0105) Arçelik A.Ş: Compliance Determination (2010-SE-0105) Arçelik A.Ş: Compliance Determination (2010-SE-0105) August 30, 2010 DOE issued a Notice of Compliance Determination after test results revealed that Arçelik's Blomberg BRFB1450 refrigerator-freezer complies with the applicable energy conservation standards. DOE reviewed test results from Arçelik and also performed DOE testing on four units of the product. The DOE had issued a subpoena for information and production of documents requesting test data from Arçelik A.Ş, after DOE received information indicating that Arçelik's Blomberg BRFB1450 model refrigerator-freezer exceeds the applicable Federal energy conservation standards. Arçelik A.Ş: Compliance Determination (2010-SE-0105) More Documents & Publications

242

TOPIC Brief BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM BIM and Demonstrating Code Compliance TOPIC BRIEF 1  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

BIM and Demonstrating Code Compliance TOPIC BRIEF 1 BIM and Demonstrating Code Compliance TOPIC BRIEF 1 Building Information Modeling and Demonstrating Code Compliance Demonstrating or verifying compliance with codes, standards, or other criteria governing building design is achieved through a set of specific tasks. These include producing construction documents; providing specifications for the products, materials, equipment, and systems to be used; and describing how they come together to create the envisioned building. W hen building construction documents and specifications are produced, they should include all information necessary to prescribe how the building is to be constructed. Plans and specifications should be readily usable to verify compliance with prescriptive requirements of codes, standards, or other desired

243

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program Fiscal Year 2000 Report  

SciTech Connect

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance program, funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office, monitors the ecosystem of he Nevada Test Site (NTS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NTS biota. This report summarizes the program's activities conducted by Bechtel Nevada during fiscal year 2000. Program activities included: (1) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (2) desert tortoise compliance,(3) ecosystem mapping, (4) sensitive species and unique habitat monitoring, and (5) biological monitoring at the HAZMAT Spill Center. Biological surveys for the presence of sensitive species were conducted for 24 NTS projects. Seventeen sites were in desert tortoise habitat, and six acres of tortoise habitat were documented as being disturbed this year. No tortoises were found in or displaced from project areas, and no tortoises were accidentally injured or killed. A topical report describing the classification of habitat types o n the NTS was completed. The report is the culmination of three years of field vegetation mapping and the analysis of vegetation data from over 1,500 ecological landform units. A long-term monitoring plan for important plant species that occur on the NTS was completed. Sitewide inventories were conducted for the western burrowing owl, bat species of concern, wild horses, raptor nests, and mule deer. Fifty-nine of 69 known owl burrows were monitored. Forty-four of the known burrows are in disturbed habitat. As in previous years, some owls were present year round on the NTS. An overall decrease in active owl burrows was observed within all three ecoregions (Mojave Desert, Transition, Great Basin Desert) from October through January. An increase in active owl burrows was observed from mid-March to early April. A total of 45 juvenile owls was detected from eight breeding pairs. One nest burrow was detected in the Mojave Desert,one in the Great Basin Desert, and six in the Transition ecoregion. Seventy bats, representing four bat species of concern, were captured in mist-nets at water sources in the Great Basin Desert ecoregion. Bats were detected with the Anabat II call-recording system at selected tunnel and mine entrances verifying that some NTS mines and tunnels are used as bat roosts. Thirty-seven adult horses and 11 foals were counted this year. Four of the five foals observed last year have survived to yearlings. A monitoring plan for NTS horses was completed. Six active red-tailed hawk nests and 10 nestling red-tailed hawks were detected this year. Two spotlighting surveys for mule deer were conducted, each over three consecutive nights in October 1999 and August 2000. The mean sighting rate in October was 1.2 deer/10 kilometers (km) and 1.6 deer/10 km in August. Selected wetlands and man-made water sources were monitored for physical parameters and wildlife use. No dead animals were observed this year in any plastic-lined sump. Pahute Mesa Pond was confirmed to have vegetation,hydrology, and soil indicators that qualify the site as a jurisdictional wetland. The chemical spill test plan for one experiment at the HAZMAT Spill Center was reviewed for its potential to impact biota downwind of spills on Frenchman Lake playa.

Wills, C.A.

2000-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

244

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program Fiscal Year 2001  

SciTech Connect

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance program, funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Operations Office, monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada Test Site (NTS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NTS biota. This report summarizes the program's activities conducted by Bechtel Nevada during fiscal year 2001. Program activities included: (1) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (2) desert tortoise compliance, (3) ecosystem mapping and data management, (4) sensitive species and unique habitat monitoring, and (5) biological monitoring at the HAZMAT Spill Center. Biological surveys for the presence of sensitive species were conducted for 23 NTS projects. Eleven sites were in desert tortoise habitat. These projects have the potential to disturb a total of 588 acres, where 568 acres of disturbance would be off-road driving. No tortoises were found in or displaced from project areas, and no tortoise s were accidentally injured or killed at project areas. One tortoise was crushed by a vehicle on a paved road. A topical report describing the classification of habitat types on the NTS was completed and distributed. The report is the culmination of three years of field vegetation mapping and the analysis of vegetation data from over 1,500 ecological landform units. Compilation of historical wildlife data was initiated. A long-term monitoring plan for important plant species that occur on the NTS was completed. Site-wide monitoring was conducted for the western burrowing owl, bat species of concern, wild horses, and raptor nests. Sixty-nine of 77 known owl burrows were monitored. As in previous years, some owls were present year round on the NTS. An overall decrease in active owl burrows was observed within all three ecoregions (Mojave Desert, Transition, Great Basin Desert) from October through January. An increase in active owl burrows was observed from mid March to early April. A total of 55 juvenile owls was detected from 11 breeding pairs. Pellet analysis of burrowing owls was completed which identified key prey species. A total of 272 bats, representing 10 bat species were captured in mist-nets at water sources in the Great Basin Desert ecoregion. Bats were detected with the Anabat II call-recording system at water sources and selected tunnel and mine entrances. Thirty-seven adult horses and 11 foals were counted this year. Two of the eleven foals observed last year survived to yearlings. Seven active raptor nests were found and monitored this year. These included two Great-horned Owl nests, three Barn Owl nests, and two Red-tailed Hawk nests. Selected wetlands and man-made water sources were monitored for physical parameters and wildlife use. No dead animals were observed this year in any plastic-lined sump. The chemical spill test plans for four experiments at the HAZMAT Spill Center were reviewed for their potential to impact biota downwind of spills on Frenchman Lake playa.

C. A. Wills

2001-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

245

Compliance, Certification and Enforcement for US Appliance and Equipment Energy Efficiency Programs by US DOE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Compliance, Certification and Enforcement Compliance, Certification and Enforcement for US Appliance and Equipment Energy Efficiency Programs by US DOE As the Department of Energy is ramping up its focus on energy-efficiency, the Office of the General Counsel is stepping up enforcement and verification efforts to ensure manufacturers meet the energy and water conservation standards expected of them and save energy for American consumers and businesses. Recent enforcement initiatives go beyond compliance with energy-efficiency standards. We are working to protect consumers through verification and supporting the enforcement of Energy Star specifications to ensure that manufacturers offer the energy savings they advertise. Enforcement initiatives include: * Conservation Standards Enforcement

246

Technical assessment of compliance with workplace air sampling requirements at WRAP  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this Technical Assessment is to satisfy HSRCM-1, ''Hanford Site Radiological Control Manual'' Article 551.4 for a documented study of facility Workplace Air Monitoring (WAM) programs. HSRCM-1 is the primary guidance for radiological control at Waste Management Federal Services of Hanford, Inc. (WMH). The HSRCM-1 complies with Title 10. Part 835 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10CFR835). This document provides an evaluation of the compliance of the Waste Receiving and Processing facility (WRAP) WAM program to the criteria standards, requirements, and documents compliance with the requirements where appropriate. Where necessary, it also indicates changes needed to bring specific locations into compliance.

HACKWORTH, M.F.

1999-06-02T23:59:59.000Z

247

Compliance, HQ GILMAD J&ILL STUDY  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

r-tin E. Biles, Director, DivFsi_on of Safety, Standards and r-tin E. Biles, Director, DivFsi_on of Safety, Standards and Compliance, HQ GILMAD J&ILL STUDY The enclosed report ccntains the result of a survey of desisated areas of Gilman E%ll on the University of Californ-ia at Berkeley Cnrr,pls . The survey ~2s conducted by re~rcsentatives of the Lzwrence Lahorator?es. The third floor and b? veyed. c.sOzsnt floor areas were sur- prior Selection of areas for srlrvey was based on the history of use associated with the I~lanhattan Project and/or early Atomic Energy Coaik5sion activities. IThilc the ;.esults of the survey show the presence of low levels of restdual activity in the two areas surveyed, it is clear that these levels represent r?o health hazard. Key fi~diugs are as follow : 1. Entire survey was free of removable contaxiilation.

248

U.S. Federal Facility Compliance Agreement for the Hanford Site, February 7, 1994 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Radionuclide for Radionuclide NESHAP State Washington Agreement Type Federal Facility Compliance Agreement Legal Driver(s) CAA Scope Summary Bring DOE's Hanford site into compliance with CAA Parties EPA; DOE; Richland Operations Office (RL) Date 02/07/1994 SCOPE * Bring DOE's Hanford site into compliance with CAA. This Compliance Plan contains a schedule for DOE to evaluate the monitoring systems associated with Designated Stacks to ensure that these systems conform to the standards for continuous monitoring systems in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 61, Subpart H. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * Beginning 30 days after the effective date of this Agreement, DOE shall submit quarterly progress reports to EPA until the requirements contained in Amendment A

249

Step 9. Provide Energy Code Compliance Documentation to the Code Official |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

9. Provide Energy Code Compliance Documentation to the Code Official 9. Provide Energy Code Compliance Documentation to the Code Official A crucial step in building energy code compliance is ensuring that the proper documentation gets to the code official. The documentation must include everything required by the code official to have as smooth a process as possible. If there is any question as to the documentation required to demonstrate compliance, asking the code official ahead of time is recommended. Refer to the design submittal sheets in Resource 1. Specific Issues The most common issue with paperwork, according to code officials, is missing information. Keep in mind that code officials also face resource limitations and missing paperwork will cause delays in the review and approval of the submittal. A brief review of the Enforcement Toolkit is

250

Waste Cleanup: Status and Implications of Compliance Agreements Between DOE and Its Regulators  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper discusses compliance agreements that affect the Department of Energy's (DOE) cleanup program. Compliance agreements are legally enforceable documents between DOE and its regulators, specifying cleanup activities and milestones that DOE has agreed to achieve. Over the years, these compliance agreements have been used to implement much of the cleanup activity at DOE sites, which is carried our primarily under two federal laws - the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (CERCLA) and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 0f 1976, as amended (RCRA). Our objectives were to determine the types of compliance agreements in effect at DOE cleanup sites, DOE's progress in achieving the milestones contained in the agreements, whether the agreements allowed DOE to prioritize work across sites according to relative risk, and possible implications the agreements have on DOE's efforts to improve the cleanup program.

Jones, G. L.; Swick, W. R.; Perry, T. C.; Kintner-Meyer, N.K.; Abraham, C. R.; Pollack, I. M.

2003-02-26T23:59:59.000Z

251

Step 2. Identify the Code and Compliance Path | Building Energy Codes  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2. Identify the Code and Compliance Path 2. Identify the Code and Compliance Path It is important to review the submitted documentation and identify which code was used for the building. Next, to determine whether the building complies with that code, the path used to demonstrate compliance must be identified. There are several compliance paths available in the 2009 and 2012 IECC and ASHRAE Standards 90.1-2007 and 90.1-2010. Each of these codes/standards contains a prescriptive path that clearly states specific requirements. Prescriptive paths limit design freedom. Each of these codes/standards also has a performance-based path that provides more design freedom and can lead to innovative design, but involves more complex energy simulations and tradeoffs between systems. Residential and smaller commercial buildings

252

EA-1155: Ground-water Compliance Activities at the Uranium Mill Tailings  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5: Ground-water Compliance Activities at the Uranium Mill 5: Ground-water Compliance Activities at the Uranium Mill Tailings Site, Spook, Wyoming EA-1155: Ground-water Compliance Activities at the Uranium Mill Tailings Site, Spook, Wyoming SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts for the proposal to comply with the Environmental Protection Agency's ground-water standards set forth in 40 CFR 192 at the Spook, Wyoming Uranium Mill Tailings Site by using the selected alternative stated in the Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Ground Water Project. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD March 1, 1997 EA-1155: Final Environmental Assessment Ground-water Compliance Activities at the Uranium Mill Tailings Site,

253

Comments of Mirant Potomac River, LLC in Compliance with Order No.  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Mirant Potomac River, LLC in Compliance with Order No. of Mirant Potomac River, LLC in Compliance with Order No. 202-06-01 Comments of Mirant Potomac River, LLC in Compliance with Order No. 202-06-01 Docket No. EO-05-01: Order No. 202-06-01: Pursuant to Order No. 202-06-1 issued by the Department of Energy ("DOE") on February 17, 2006, Mirant Potomac River, LLC ("Mirant") submits the following comments regarding the operation of the Potomac River Plant ("Plant") during certain days in January 2006, during which Mirant was required to operate pursuant to Ordering Paragraph A of Order No. 202-05-3, as well as information regarding the Plant's current operations. Comments of Mirant Potomac River, LLC in Compliance with Order No. 202-06-01 More Documents & Publications Supplemental Comments of David K. Paylor, Director of the Commonwealth of

254

Optimal design of a phase-in emissions trading program with voluntary compliance options  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In this paper we explore the welfare implications of voluntary compliance within an emissions trading program and derive optimal permits allocations to affected and opti-in sources when the environmental regulator has ...

Montero, Juan Pablo

255

1996 update on compliance and emissions trading under the U.S. acid rain program  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

November 1997This paper reports on the second year of compliance with the sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions-reduction and -trading provisions of the Title IV of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA). The material is intended ...

Ellerman, A. Denny

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

256

Compliance Behavior in the EU-ETS: Cross Border Trading, Banking and Borrowing  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This paper exploits a little used data resource within the central registry of the European Unions Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) to analyze cross border flows of allowances for compliance purposes during the first ...

Ellerman, A. Denny

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

257

DOE Steps Lead to Significant Increase in Compliance with Energy Efficiency  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Steps Lead to Significant Increase in Compliance with Energy Steps Lead to Significant Increase in Compliance with Energy Efficiency Reporting Requirements DOE Steps Lead to Significant Increase in Compliance with Energy Efficiency Reporting Requirements January 12, 2010 - 12:00am Addthis WASHINGTON DC - The Department of Energy announced today that it has received certifications for over 600,000 residential appliances in 15 different product categories in response to the Department's enhanced energy efficiency enforcement efforts. DOE recently announced that manufacturers had until January 8, 2010 to submit correct energy use data to the Department of Energy before aggressive enforcement actions were taken. The certification data provided by 160 different manufacturers will allow DOE to review manufacturers' compliance with minimum energy

258

Final Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Slick Rock, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

58 58 Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Slick Rock, Colorado, UMTRA Project Sites Final February 2003 Prepared by U.S. Department of Energy Grand Junction Office Grand Junction, Colorado Work Performed Under DOE Contract No. DE-AC13-02GJ79491 DOE Grand Junction Office EA of Ground Water Compliance at the Slick Rock Sites February 2003 Final Page iii Contents Page Acronyms and Abbreviations...........................................................................................................v Executive Summary...................................................................................................................... vii 1.0 Introduction.............................................................................................................................1

259

Energy Code Compliance in a Detailed Commercial Building Sample: The Effects of Missing Data  

SciTech Connect

Most commercial buildings in the U.S. are required by State or local jurisdiction to meet energy standards. The enforcement of these standards is not well known and building practice without them on a national scale is also little understood. To provide an understanding of these issues, a database has been developed at PNNL that includes detailed energy related building characteristics of 162 commercial buildings from across the country. For this analysis, the COMcheck? compliance software (developed at PNNL) was used to assess compliance with energy codes among these buildings. Data from the database for each building provided the program input with percentage energy compliance to the ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-1999 energy as the output. During the data input process it was discovered that some essential data for showing compliance of the building envelope was missed and defaults had to be developed to provide complete compliance information. This need for defaults for some data inputs raised the question of what the effect on documenting compliance could be due to missing data. To help answer this question a data collection effort was completed to assess potential differences. Using the program Dodge View, as much of the missing envelope data as possible was collected from the building plans and the database input was again run through COMcheck?. The outputs of both compliance runs were compared to see if the missing data would have adversely affected the results. Both of these results provided a percentage compliance of each building in the envelope and lighting categories, showing by how large a percentage each building either met or fell short of the ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-1999 energy code. The results of the compliance runs showed that 57.7 % of the buildings met or exceeded envelope requirements with defaults and that 68 % met or exceeded envelope requirements with the actual data. Also, 53.6 % of the buildings met or surpassed the lighting requirements in both cases. The dataset of 162 buildings is not large enough to accurately apply theses findings to all commercial buildings across the U.S., but it does provide a rough idea of what to generally expect. This database also has other uses such as characterization of commercial buildings by each specific data point and in splitting up the total of 162 buildings into smaller subsets to characterize such groups as large (>5000 sq ft) or small (<5000 sq ft) commercial buildings.

Biyani, Rahul K.; Richman, Eric E.

2003-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

260

Methods for verifying compliance with low-level radioactive waste acceptance criteria  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report summarizes the methods that are currently employed and those that can be used to verify compliance with low-level radioactive waste (LLW) disposal facility waste acceptance criteria (WAC). This report presents the applicable regulations representing the Federal, State, and site-specific criteria for accepting LLW. Typical LLW generators are summarized, along with descriptions of their waste streams and final waste forms. General procedures and methods used by the LLW generators to verify compliance with the disposal facility WAC are presented. The report was written to provide an understanding of how a regulator could verify compliance with a LLW disposal facility`s WAC. A comprehensive study of the methodology used to verify waste generator compliance with the disposal facility WAC is presented in this report. The study involved compiling the relevant regulations to define the WAC, reviewing regulatory agency inspection programs, and summarizing waste verification technology and equipment. The results of the study indicate that waste generators conduct verification programs that include packaging, classification, characterization, and stabilization elements. The current LLW disposal facilities perform waste verification steps on incoming shipments. A model inspection and verification program, which includes an emphasis on the generator`s waste application documentation of their waste verification program, is recommended. The disposal facility verification procedures primarily involve the use of portable radiological survey instrumentation. The actual verification of generator compliance to the LLW disposal facility WAC is performed through a combination of incoming shipment checks and generator site audits.

NONE

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fleet-wide cafe compliance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Status and Trends in U.S. Compliance and Voluntary Renewable Energy Certificate Markets (2010 Data)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report documents the status and trends of 'compliance'--renewable energy certificate (REC) markets used to meet state renewable portfolio standard (RPS) requirements--and 'voluntary' markets--those in which consumers and institutions purchase renewable energy to match their electricity needs on a voluntary basis. Today, 29 states and the District of Columbia have an RPS, more than half of all U.S. electricity customers have an option to purchase some type of green power product directly from a retail electricity provider, and all consumers have the option to purchase RECs. This report documents REC activities and trends in the United States. The compliance REC market analysis includes analysis of REC trading, regional REC markets, REC tracking systems, types of compliance RECs, compliance REC pricing trends, and an overview of compliance with RPS polices. The voluntary REC analysis presents data and analysis on voluntary market sales and customer participation, products and premiums, green pricing marketing and administrative expenses, voluntary REC pricing, and the voluntary carbon offsets market. The report concludes with a discussion of upcoming guidance from the Federal Trade Commission on green marketing claims, the emergence of community solar programs, and the potential impact of Dodd-Frank regulations on the REC market.

Heeter, J.; Bird, L.

2011-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

262

Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement Powerpoint Presentation for ASHRAE Conference, January 31, 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document is Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement Powerpoint Presentation for ASHRAE Conference, January 31, 2011

263

SIGNATURE OF THIS CO U A RECORD OF THIS DEC SION. NEPA Compliance Officer Signature:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

THIS THIS CO U A RECORD OF THIS DEC SION. NEPA Compliance Officer Signature: .PA Compliance Officer Page 1 of 1 PINC-5.F2. t1.01A11) U.S. DEPARMENT OF ENERGY FERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERI\ ITNATION RECIPIENT:The University of Texas at Austin STATE: TX PROJECT Techno-economic Modeling of the Integration of 20% Wind and Large-scale energy storage in ERCOT TITLE : by 2030 Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-PS36-09G099009 DE -EE0001 385 GF0-1 0-026 0 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.IA), I have made the following determination: CX, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering (including, but not limited to, literature surveys, inventories, audits), data analysis (including

264

Step 10. Get Assistance on Energy Code and Compliance Questions | Building  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

10. Get Assistance on Energy Code and Compliance Questions 10. Get Assistance on Energy Code and Compliance Questions Direct assistance on building energy code compliance questions is available from several sources. In addition, there are many training courses available to learn more about specific code requirements. Resources Contact the local jurisdiction having authority BECP Helpdesk ICC Technical Opinions and Interpretations ASHRAE Standards Interpretations ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2007 ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2010 BECP Training Courses Residential Requirements of the 2009 IECC Residential Requirements of the 2012 IECC Commercial Building Envelope Requirements of the 2009 IECC Commercial Lighting Requirements of the 2009 IECC Commercial Mechanical Requirements of the 2009 IECC Requirements of ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2007

265

Order Module--DOE O 451.1B, NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT COMPLIANCE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

51.1B, NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT 51.1B, NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT COMPLIANCE PROGRAM Order Module--DOE O 451.1B, NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT COMPLIANCE PROGRAM DOE O 451.1B, National Environmental Policy Act Compliance Program, replaces DOE O 451.1A of the same name. DOE O 451.1B is ten pages long. Due to the concise nature of this Order, this module will be limited to one level. To complete this module and satisfy the requirements for qualification 1. Obtain a copy of DOEO 451.1B. A copy of this document is available on the Office of Management and Administration's Web site at http://www.directives.doe.gov or through the course manager. 2. Review the objectives, requirements, and responsibilities sections of the Order. 3. When you are ready, ask the course manager for the criterion test.

266

Energy Technology and Engineering Center Compliance Order, October 6, 1995 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Technology and Engineering Center Energy Technology and Engineering Center Agreement Name Energy Technology and Engineering Center Compliance Order, October 6, 1995 HWCA # 95/96-019 State California Agreement Type Compliance Agreement Legal Driver(s) FFCAct Scope Summary Address LDR requirements pertaining to storage and treatment of covered waste at ETEC Parties DOE; State of California Environmental Protection Agency (Department of Toxic Substances Control) Date 10/6/1995 SCOPE * Address LDR requirements pertaining to storage and treatment of covered waste at ETEC. * Require adherence to the Site Treatment Plan which provides overall schedules for achieving compliance with LDR storage and treatment requirements based on milestones. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * Respondent shall carry out all activities in accordance with the schedules and

267

FIA-12-0025 - In the Matter of Center for Contract Compliance | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 - In the Matter of Center for Contract Compliance 5 - In the Matter of Center for Contract Compliance FIA-12-0025 - In the Matter of Center for Contract Compliance The Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision denying an appeal (Appeal) from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) determination issued by the Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence (IN). The appellant filed a FOIA request for documents relating or referring to the 'analysis of the animal rights movement in the U.S.'" referenced in a May 11, 1989, letter from the director of the DOE's Office of Threat Assessment to a British law enforcement official. The request was referred to IN, which issued a determination stating that it had located no documents responsive to the request. In the course of reviewing the appeal, OHA sought to determine which DOE office assumed the

268

Step 2. Choose a compliance path within the applicable energy code |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2. Choose a compliance path within the applicable energy code 2. Choose a compliance path within the applicable energy code For some designers, an ideal energy code would tell them exactly what they need to do for their building. For other designers, being told exactly what they need to do might be viewed as limiting their creativity. Energy codes attempt to cater to both types of designers by offering multiple compliance paths within the code. BECP's Commercial Buildings for Architects Resource Guide (Resource 1) states the issue as An energy code's format can significantly influence design, sometimes more than the actual requirements. A prescriptive code clearly states what applies, but may limit design freedom and foster the view that the building is composed of separate, non-related systems. A performance-based code

269

SIGNATURE OF THIS MEMORAND TES A RECORD OF THIS DECISION. NEPA Compliance Officer Signature:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MEMORAND MEMORAND TES A RECORD OF THIS DECISION. NEPA Compliance Officer Signature: EPA Compliance Officer Date: (93 Page 1 of 2 INIC*EF2a U.S. DEPARTI\ LENT OF ENERGY F.ERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NFPA DETERI\ 11-NATION RECIPIENT:Tennessee Tech University STATE: TN PROJECT TITLE : Recovery Act: Multi-level Energy Storage and Controls for Large-scale Wind Energy Integration Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-PS36-09G099009 DE-EE0001 383 GF0-10-010 0 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.IA), I have made the following determination: CX, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering (including, but not limited to, literature surveys, inventories, audits), data analysis (including

270

Ground Water Compliance Action Plan for the Old Rifle, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

GJO-2000-177-TAR GJO-2000-177-TAR MAC-GWRFL 1.9 Ground Water Compliance Action Plan for the Old Rifle, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site December 2001 Work Performed Under DOE Contract No. DE-AC13-96GJ87335 for the U.S. Department of Energy Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. GJO-2000-177-TAR MAC-GWRFL 1.9 Ground Water Compliance Action Plan for the Old Rifle, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site December 2001 Prepared by U.S. Department of Energy Grand Junction Office Grand Junction, Colorado Project Number UGW-511-0017-12-000 Document Number U0066302 Work Performed under DOE Contract No. DE-AC13-96GJ87335 Document Number U0066302 Contents DOE/Grand Junction Office Ground Water Compliance Action Plan for Old Rifle, Colorado

271

The Impact of Environmental Compliance Costs on U.S. Refining Profitability  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

The Impact of Environmental Compliance Costs on U.S. Refining Profitability October 1997 Energy Information Administration Office of Energy Markets and End Use U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 This report was prepared by the Energy Information Administration, the independent statistical and analytical agency within the Department of Energy. The information contained herein should not be construed as advocating or reflecting any policy position of the Department of Energy or any other organization. Energy Information Administration/The Impact of Environmental Compliance Costs on U.S. Refining Profitability ii Contacts The Impact of Environmental Compliance Costs on U.S. Refining Profitability was prepared in the Office of Energy Markets and End Use of the Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy under the general direction of W. Calvin

272

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program Fiscal/Calendar Year 2004 Report  

SciTech Connect

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance program, funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office, monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada Test Site and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to Nevada Test Site biota. This report summarizes the program's activities conducted by Bechtel Nevada during the Fiscal Year 2004 and the additional months of October, November, and December 2004, reflecting a change in the monitoring period to a calendar year rather than a fiscal year as reported in the past. This change in the monitoring period was made to better accommodate information required for the Nevada Test Site Environmental Report, which reports on a calendar year rather than a fiscal year. Program activities included: (1) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (2) desert tortoise compliance, (3) ecosystem mapping and data management, (4) sensitive species and unique habitat monitoring, (5) habitat restoration monitoring, and (6) biological monitoring at the Hazardous Materials Spill Center.

Bechtel Nevada

2005-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

273

Emission allowances and utility compliance choices: Market development and regulatory response  

SciTech Connect

This paper will examine the multifaceted goals and problems of states and utilities relative to compliance with Title IV of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, and in particular as they pertain to the development and functioning of the allowance market together with utility pollution control and power generation technology choice. Section 2 presents possible utility compliance strategies along with possible barriers that utilities may confront regarding the development of a SO{sub 2} allowance market. Section 3 discusses current regulatory barriers and requirements being implemented by state PUCs, and Section 4 offers some policy recommendations to achieve the goals of Title IV. Finally, Section 5 presents a summary and conclusion; Appendix A provides programs/mandates developed to date by high sulfur coal states in response to Title IV compliance requirements. (VC)

South, D.W.; Bailey, K.A. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States); McDermott, K.A. [Illinois State Univ., Normal, IL (United States). Center for Regulatory Studies

1992-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

274

Emission allowances and utility compliance choices: Market development and regulatory response  

SciTech Connect

This paper will examine the multifaceted goals and problems of states and utilities relative to compliance with Title IV of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, and in particular as they pertain to the development and functioning of the allowance market together with utility pollution control and power generation technology choice. Section 2 presents possible utility compliance strategies along with possible barriers that utilities may confront regarding the development of a SO{sub 2} allowance market. Section 3 discusses current regulatory barriers and requirements being implemented by state PUCs, and Section 4 offers some policy recommendations to achieve the goals of Title IV. Finally, Section 5 presents a summary and conclusion; Appendix A provides programs/mandates developed to date by high sulfur coal states in response to Title IV compliance requirements. (VC)

South, D.W.; Bailey, K.A. (Argonne National Lab., IL (United States)); McDermott, K.A. (Illinois State Univ., Normal, IL (United States). Center for Regulatory Studies)

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

275

Internal Compliance Program for Approved North American Electric Reliability Corporation and Regional Reliability Standards: A Guide to Compliance for Fossil Generators  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to provide guidance to generator owner and operator members of the Electric Power Research Institute in complying with the North American Electric Reliability Corporations (NERCs) mandatory reliability standards. Included here are the standards and associated requirements applicable to generator owners and operators who have registered with their regional entity, along with guidance on how successful compliance has been achieved.This report ...

2012-12-20T23:59:59.000Z

276

"Annual NEPA Planning Summary Status of Ongoing NEPA Compliance Activities: Environmental Assessments"  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Status of Ongoing NEPA Compliance Activities: Environmental Assessments" Status of Ongoing NEPA Compliance Activities: Environmental Assessments" "NNSA NA-21" "January 2012" "#","*Title, Location","Estimated Cost","Estimated Schedule (**NEPA Milestones)",,"Description" ,"U.S.-origin Spent Nuclear Fuel Returned to the United States from Austria in 2025",250000,"Determination Date:","February 2012","NA-21 seeks to analyze the impacts of U.S.-origin spent nuclear fuel returned to the United States from Austria in 2025 since current NEPA documentation for the U.S.-Origin Remove Program does not address this scenario." ,,,"Transmittal to State:","March 2012"

277

Management initiatives to waste management decisions and environmental compliance in Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

SciTech Connect

Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. (MMES) has been the operating contractor for the nuclear production and research facilities at Oak Ridge, Tennessee and Paducah, Kentucky for about four and one-half years. Environmental compliance, regulatory interaction, and public confidence have been very significant issues during this time. This presentation will review the environmental situation in Oak Ridge in 1984 and will discuss management initiatives and experience in the development and implementation of effective environmental and waste management and health and safety programs committed to the protection of the environment, our workers and the public with an overall goal of full compliance with all current and anticipated regulations.

Jones, C.G.

1988-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

278

Idaho CERCLA Disposal Facility Complex Compliance Demonstration for DOE Order 435.1  

SciTech Connect

This compliance demonstration document provides an analysis of the Idaho CERCLA Disposal Facility (ICDF) Complex compliance with DOE Order 435.1. The ICDF Complex includes the disposal facility (landfill), evaporation pond, administration facility, weigh scale, and various staging/storage areas. These facilities were designed and constructed to be compliant with DOE Order 435.1, Resource Conservation and Recovery act Subtitle C, and Toxic Substances Control Act polychlorinated biphenyl design and construction standards. The ICDF Complex is designated as the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) facility for the receipt, staging/storage, treatment, and disposal of INL Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) waste streams.

Simonds, J.

2007-11-06T23:59:59.000Z

279

The IT Regulatory and Standards Compliance Handbook:: How to Survive Information Systems Audit and Assessments  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This book provides comprehensive methodology, enabling the staff charged with an IT security audit to create a sound framework, allowing them to meet the challenges of compliance in a way that aligns with both business and technical needs. This "roadmap" ... Keywords: Applied, Computer Science, Computers, Security

Craig S. Wright

2008-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

280

Understanding the Impact of Climate Policy on Electric Company Compliance and Investment Decisions  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report presents interim results of a multiyear effort to better understand how climate policy could impact electric power sector investment and operating decisions. The research reported here focuses on extending prior analyses to determine the effects of CO2 emission constraints on individual generators and to provide guidance on how they can develop appropriate compliance strategies.

2008-12-19T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fleet-wide cafe compliance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Draft Title 40 CFR 191 compliance certification application for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Volume 1  

SciTech Connect

The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) is a research and development facility for the demonstration of the permanent isolation of transuranic radioactive wastes in a geologic formation. The facility was constructed in southeastern New Mexico in a manner intended to meet criteria established by the scientific and regulatory community for the safe, long-term disposal of transuranic wastes. The US Department of Energy (DOE) is preparing an application to demonstrate compliance with the requirements outlined in Title 40, Part 191 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) for the permanent disposal of transuranic wastes. As mandated by the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Land Withdrawal Act of 1992, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) must evaluate this compliance application and provide a determination regarding compliance with the requirements within one year of receiving a complete application. Because the WIPP is a very complex program, the DOE has planned to submit the application as a draft in two parts. This strategy will allow for the DOE and the EPA to begin technical discussions on critical WIPP issues before the one-year compliance determination period begins. This report is the first of these two draft submittals.

NONE

1995-03-31T23:59:59.000Z

282

Student manual, Book 2: Orientation to occupational safety compliance in DOE  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This is a student hand-book an Occupational Safety Compliance in DOE. Topics include the following: Electrical; materials handling & storage; inspection responsibilities & procedures; general environmental controls; confined space entry; lockout/tagout; office safety, ergonomics & human factors; medical & first aid, access to records; construction safety; injury/illness reporting system; and accident investigation procedures.

Colley, D.L.

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

283

Intracavity Sensing via Compliance Voltage in an External Cavity Quantum Cascade Laser  

SciTech Connect

We demonstrate a technique for gas phase spectroscopy and sensing by detecting changes in compliance voltage of an external cavity quantum cascade laser due to intracavity absorption. The technique is characterized and used to measure the absorption spectrum of water vapor and Freon-134a.

Phillips, Mark C.; Taubman, Matthew S.

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

284

Spectral Mask Compliance and Amplifier Nonlinearity in Single Carrier and OFDM Systems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In this paper we investige the comparative merits of two transmission techniques, OFDM and single carrier, with respect to spectral mask compliance when a nonlinear amplifier is utilized in transmission. Two different nonlinear power amplifier models ... Keywords: OFDM, Power amplifier nonlinearity, Single carrier, Spectral mask

Erman Kken; A. zgr Y?lmaz

2012-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

285

Information security policy compliance: an empirical study of rationality-based beliefs and information security awareness  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Many organizations recognize that their employees, who are often considered the weakest link in information security, can also be great assets in the effort to reduce risk related to information security. Since employees who comply with the information ... Keywords: behavioral issues of information security, compliance, information security awareness, information security management, information security policy, theory of planned behavior

Burcu Bulgurcu; Hasan Cavusoglu; Izak Benbasat

2010-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

286

Appendix D 2008 Residential Appendices RA4 D-1 2008 Residential Compliance Manual August 2009  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

eligibility and installation criteria to be modeled by any ACM and receive energy credit for compliance of the truss/rafter (top chord). A minimum air space shall be maintained between the top surface of the radiant of the ceiling insulation to allow ventilation air to flow between the roof decking and #12;Appendix D 2008

287

Idaho CERCLA Disposal Facility Complex Compliance Demonstration for DOE Order 435.1  

SciTech Connect

This compliance demonstration document provides an analysis of the Idaho CERCLA Disposal Facility (ICDF) Complex compliance with DOE Order 435.1. The ICDF Complex includes the disposal facility (landfill), evaporation pond, admin facility, weigh scale, decon building, treatment systems, and various staging/storage areas. These facilities were designed and are being constructed to be compliant with DOE Order 435.1, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Subtitle C, and Toxic Substances Control Act polychlorinated biphenyl design and construction standards. The ICDF Complex is designated as the central Idaho National Laboratory (INL) facilityyy for the receipt, staging/storage, treatment, and disposal of INL Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) waste streams. This compliance demonstration document discusses the conceptual site model for the ICDF Complex area. Within this conceptual site model, the selection of the area for the ICDF Complex is discussed. Also, the subsurface stratigraphy in the ICDF Complex area is discussed along with the existing contamination beneath the ICDF Complex area. The designs for the various ICDF Complex facilities are also included in this compliance demonstration document. These design discussions are a summary of the design as presented in the Remedial Design/Construction Work Plans for the ICDF landfill and evaporation pond and the Staging, Storage, Sizing, and Treatment Facility. Each of the major facilities or systems is described including the design criteria.

J. Simonds

2006-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

288

Restaurants & Cafes around RIMS HigashiojiSt  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

noodle (sara-udon) 11:30­14:30, 17:00­21:00 Closed on Friday 22 Goya Okinawa & Asian 12:00­16:00, 18

Ohtsuki, Tomotada

289

CAFE : a framework for cell application development  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

the form of vertex and pixel shader programs. However, thisvaries depending upon the shader version supported by thethe data required by the shader to compute the final output

Hammer, Joseph Keith

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

290

Figure 71. Average fuel economy of new light-duty vehicles, 1980 ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Sheet3 Sheet2 Sheet1 Figure 71. Average fuel economy of new light-duty vehicles, 1980-2040 (miles per gallon, CAFE compliance values) History Reference case

291

Final Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Slick Rock, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Impact Impact Ground Water Compliance at the Slick Rock, Colorado, UMTRA Project Sites AGENCY: U.S. DEP.4RTMENT OF ENERGY ACTIOK: FL&-DING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMP-ACT (FONSI) SU$IM$RY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) plans to implement ground lvater compliance strategies for two Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTR.4) Project sites near Slick Rock. Colorado. The purpose of the strategies is to comply with U.S. En\.ironmental Protection .Qency (EP.Aj ground n'ater standards defined in Title 40 Codr ~fF~d~w/ iieplutio?r.s (CFR) Part 192. and in so doing. protect human health and the en\.ironment. Ground water at the Slick Rock sites is contaminated with residual radioactive materials from hisTorica acti\,ities, associated with the processin of uranium ore, The planned action (~formeri>,.

292

Microsoft Word - Comments on Emergency Order 202-05-3 and Mirant Compliance Plan.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 21, 2006 Lawrence Mansueti Permitting, Siting, and Analysis Division Office of Electricity and Energy Reliability U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585-0119 Re: Comments on Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Limited Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station and Proposed Mirant Compliance Plan Dear Mr. Mansueti: The Institute for Public Representation, on behalf of the Potomac Riverkeeper, Inc., the Patuxent Riverkeeper, and the Anacostia Riverkeeper at Earth Conservation Corps, submits the following comments on the Department of Energy's December 20, 2005 Emergency Order 202-05-3 and on Mirant's proposed Compliance Plan filed pursuant to that Order. Dep't of Energy's Emergency

293

Recipient. Uty of San Jose ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

81 81 Recipient. Uty of San Jose ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) LED Streetlights A9, All, B5.1 Waste Stream clause Municipal Energy Efficiency Retrofits A9, All, B5.1 Waste Stream clause Historic Preservation clause Engineering clause Municipal Solar Program A9, All Administration, outreach, technical advice, and outreach should be CX'd; implementation of projects under this activity should be conditioned pending further NEPA review. Additional Comments: Based on my review of information conveyed to me and in my possession (or attached) concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (as authorized under DOE Order 451.1B), I have

294

Status and Trends in U.S. Compliance and Voluntary Renewable Energy Certificate Markets (2010 Data)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Status and Trends in U.S. Status and Trends in U.S. Compliance and Voluntary Renewable Energy Certificate Markets (2010 Data) Jenny Heeter and Lori Bird Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-52925 October 2011 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401 303-275-3000 * www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Status and Trends in U.S. Compliance and Voluntary Renewable Energy Certificate Markets (2010 Data) Jenny Heeter and Lori Bird Prepared under Task No. SAO9.3110 Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-52925 October 2011 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government.

295

Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site Waste Compliance Order, August 21, 1997 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7-08-21-02 7-08-21-02 State Colorado Agreement Type Consent Order Legal Driver(s) RCRA Scope Summary Establish compliance requirements and schedules for the implementation of a "Waste Chemical Project Plan" Parties DOE; Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC; Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Date 8/21/1997 SCOPE * Establish compliance requirements and schedules for the implementation of a "Waste Chemical Project Plan" (the "Waste Chemical Plan") at RFETS. * Resolve violations of the Colorado Hazardous Waste Act and the Colorado Hazardous Waste Regulations. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * Activities in the Waste Chemical Plan shall be completed by no later than December 31, 1999, except as to Excluded Chemicals (discussed in Paragraph 22 of this Order

296

Recipient. County of Berks, PA ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Recipient. County of Berks, PA ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Replacement of Steam and Condensation Lines at North Campus B5.1 Waste Stream, Engineering, and Historical Preservation clauses. The new boiler cannot result in a net increase in air emissions. Additional Comments: Based on my review of information conveyed to me and in my possession (or attached) concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (as authorized under DOE Order 451.1B), I have determined that the proposed action fits within the specified class of actions, other applicable regulatory requirements are met, and the proposed action is hereby categorically excluded from further

297

Summary Notes from the 10 July 2007 Generic Technical Issue Discussion on Point of Compliance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the 10 July 2007 Generic Technical Issue Discussion on Point of the 10 July 2007 Generic Technical Issue Discussion on Point of Compliance Attendees: Representatives from Department of Energy-Savannah River (DOE-SR), DOE-Headquarters (DOE-HQ), and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), met at the NRC offices in Rockville, Maryland on 10 July 2007. Representatives from the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) and State of Idaho participated in the meeting via a teleconference link. Discussion: DOE believes that based on the position papers provided prior to the meeting, DOE and NRC staff have many areas of agreement and no significant areas of disagreement with respect to the specific point of compliance requirements articulated in the respective DOE and NRC requirements. The NRC position paper was based on

298

NPDES permit compliance and enforcement: A resource guide for oil and gas operators  

SciTech Connect

During the fall of 1996, the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission sponsored sessions for government and industry representatives to discuss concerns about the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program under the Clean Water Act. In January 1997, the NPDES Education/Communication/Training Workgroup (ECT Workgroup) was established with co-leaders from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and industry. The ECT Workgroup`s purpose was to develop ideas that would improve communication between NPDES regulators and the oil and gas industry regarding NPDES compliance issues. The Workgroup focused on several areas, including permit compliance monitoring and reporting, enforcement activity and options, and treatment technology. The ECT Workgroup also discussed the need for materials and information to help NPDES regulatory agency personnel understand more about oil and gas industry exploration and extraction operations and treatment processes. This report represents a compendium of the ECT Workgroup`s efforts.

1998-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

299

Recipient: County of Horry, SC ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Recipient: County of Horry, SC ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Project Activity #1 - City of Conway- New Photovoltaic Generating system at Public Works Complex B5.1 Historical Preservation Clause Waste Stream Clause Engineering Clause Project Activity #2 - Horry County Building & Facilities B5.1 Historical Preservation Clause Waste Stream Clause Engineering Clause Additional Comments: Based on my review of information conveyed to me and in my possession (or attached) concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (as authorized under DOE Order 451.18), I have determined that the proposed action fits within the specified class of actions, other applicable

300

MEMORNDUM FOR CAROL M. BORGSTROM DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF NEPA POLICY AND COMPLIANCE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 24,2013 January 24,2013 MEMORNDUM FOR CAROL M. BORGSTROM DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF NEPA POLICY AND COMPLIANCE OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL FROM: MARCUS E. JONES NN= � J ]=� ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR OF SCI� FOR SAFETY, SECURITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE SUBJECT: Offce of Science (SC) Annual National Environmental Policy Act (NEP A) Planning Summary for 2013 This is in response to a December 07, 2012, memorandum to the Secretarial Officers and Heads

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fleet-wide cafe compliance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Compliance Monitoring of Subyearling Chinook Salmon Smolt Survival and Passage at Bonneville Dam, Summer 2012  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this compliance study was to estimate dam passage survival of subyearling Chinook salmon at Bonneville Dam during summer 2012, as required by the 2008 Federal Columbia River Power System Biological Opinion. The study also estimated smolt passage survival from the forebay 2 km upstream of the dam to the tailrace 1 km below the dam, as well as forebay residence time, tailrace egress, and spill passage efficiency, as required in the 2008 Columbia Basin Fish Accords.

Skalski, J. R.; Townsend, Richard L.; Seaburg, Adam; Ploskey, Gene R.; Weiland, Mark A.; Hughes, James S.; Woodley, Christa M.; Deng, Zhiqun; Carlson, Thomas J.

2013-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

302

Electric Utility Phase I Acid Rain Compliance Strategies for the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990  

Reports and Publications (EIA)

The Acid Rain Program is divided into two time periods; Phase I, from 1995 through 1999, and Phase II, starting in 2000. Phase I mostly affects power plants that are the largest sources of SO2 and NOx . Phase II affects virtually all electric power producers, including utilities and nonutilities. This report is a study of the effects of compliance with Phase I regulations on the costs and operations of electric utilities, but does not address any Phase II impacts.

Information Center

1994-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

303

Corporate Carbon Strategy and Procurement of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Offsets for Compliance with Mandatory Carbon Constraints  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report explores strategies that may be employed by electric companies and other industrial enterprises to reduce their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to comply with potential future mandatory GHG emissions reduction programs. It explores the opportunities, challenges and risks associated with reducing GHG emissions from within a company's own operations, as well as other approaches that may be used for compliance such as real-time coal-to-natural gas fuel switching in the regional dispatch of electr...

2010-12-23T23:59:59.000Z

304

Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Naturita, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Environmental Assessment addresses the environmental effects of a proposed action and the no action alternative to comply with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ground water standards at the Naturita, Colorado, Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Project site. In 1998, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) completed surface cleanup at the site and encapsulated the tailings in a disposal cell 15 miles northwest near the former town of Uravan, Colorado. Ground water contaminants of potential concern at the Naturita site are uranium and vanadium. Uranium concentrations exceed the maximum concentration limit (MCL) of 0.044 milligram per liter (mg/L). Vanadium has no MCL; however, vanadium concentrations exceed the EPA Region III residential risk-based concentration of 0.33 mg/L (EPA 2002). The proposed compliance strategy for uranium and vanadium at the Naturita site is no further remediation in conjunction with the application of alternate concentration limits. Institutional controls with ground water and surface water monitoring will be implemented for these constituents as part of the compliance strategy. This compliance strategy will be protective of human health and the environment. The proposed monitoring program will begin upon regulatory concurrence with the Ground Water Compliance Action Plan (DOE 2002a). Monitoring will consist of verifying that institutional controls remain in place, collecting ground water samples to verify that concentrations of uranium and vanadium are decreasing, and collecting surface water samples to verify that contaminant concentrations do not exceed a regulatory limit or risk-based concentration. If these criteria are not met, DOE would reevaluate the proposed action and determine the need for further National Environmental Policy Act documentation. No comments were received from the public during the public comment period. Two public meetings were held during this period. Minutes of these meetings are included as Attachment 1.

N /A

2003-04-23T23:59:59.000Z

305

Methodology for Residential Building Energy Simulations Implemented in the International Code Compliance Calculator (IC3)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Since 2001, Texas has been proactive in initiating clean air and energy efficiency in building policies. The Texas Emissions Reduction Plan legislation (SB 5, 77TH Leg., 2001) mandates statewide adoption of energy codes, creates a 5% annual energy savings goal for public facilities in affected counties through 2007 and provides approximately $150 million in cash incentives for clean diesel emissions grants and energy research. The Texas Legislation extended this annual electric reduction goal in public facilities through 2013. Texas was the first state in the nation to create NOx emissions reduction credits for energy efficiency and renewable energy through the State Implementation Plan under the Federal Clean Air Act. This paper presents the methodology for calculating the energy usage from a proposed residential house and the corresponding 2001 International Energy Conservation Code baseline house. This methodology is applied in the International Code Compliance Calculator, which is a publicly accessible web-based energy code compliance software developed by the Energy Systems Laboratory based on the Texas Building Energy Performance Standards. This calculator evaluates and certifies above-code compliance for homes in Texas. It also calculates NOx, SOx and CO2 emissions reductions from the energy savings of the proposed house for the electric utility associated with the user using the data from the Emissions and Generation Resource Integrated Database provided by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Liu, Z.; Mukhopadhyay, J.; Malhotra, M.; Haberl, J.; Gilman, D.; Montgomery, C.; McKelvey, K.; Culp, C.; Yazdani, B.

2008-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

306

Energy, Product, and Economic Implications of Environmental Compliance Options- A Southern California Case Study  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Industrial plants that are faced with regulated emissions constraints may also have a complex array of compliance options from which to choose. Technology options may include a number of pollution control alternatives: retrofits with more efficient equipment, fuel switching and/or process change to electrotechnologies, or advanced gas-fueled technologies. In some cases, a plant may be able to purchase emissions reduction credits (ERCs) in lieu of changing equipment, as would be the case in Southern California if the proposed RECLAIM regulations are adopted. In such cases, ERCs could also be sold by plants that achieve emissions reductions, offsetting the costs of their technology investments. This paper explores an exhaustive list of compliance options for a single industry, describing how to collect data and compare options in terms of costs, commercial availability, and impacts on energy use, emissions, plant throughput or productivity, product quality control, and other characteristics relevant to selecting an option to implement. We discuss how the options are assembled into an array of coping strategies for environmental compliance. This work is part of an ongoing project to develop a database of regulations and technology options. (A major Southern California industry, in terms of energy use and emissions, will be selected in October and the work completed in December, in preparation for a broadened scope to the entire industrial sector.)

Kyricopoulos, P. F.; Dennison, W. J.

1994-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

307

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory National Environmental Policy Act Compliance Program -- FY 2010 Annual Report  

SciTech Connect

During fiscal year (FY) 2010, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Environmental Protection and Regulatory Programs Division (before March 1, 2011 known as the Environmental Management Services Department) staff performed a number of activities as part of PNNLs National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance program. These activities helped to verify U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) and Richland Operations Office (RL) compliance with NEPA requirements and streamline the NEPA process for federal activities conducted at PNNL. Self-assessments were performed to address NEPA compliance and cultural and biological resource protection. The NEPA self-assessments focused on implementation within the PNNL Energy and Environment Directorate and routine maintenance activities conducted during the previous calendar year. The cultural and biological resource self-assessments were conducted in accordance with the PNSO Cultural and Biological Resources Management Plan, which specifies annual monitoring of important resources to assess and document the status of the resources and the associated protective mechanisms in place to protect sensitive resources.

Weeks, Regan S.

2011-04-20T23:59:59.000Z

308

Why did they comply while others did not? : environmental compliance of small firms and implications for regulation  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This doctoral dissertation aims to offer new insights into the environmental compliance behavior of small firms (SFs). Specifically, the dissertation examines the impacts of two categories of factors. The first category ...

Lee, Eungkyoon

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

309

Annual Energy Outlook 2010 with Projections to 2035-Graphic Data  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Annual Energy Outlook 2010 with Projections to 2035 - Graphic Data Annual Energy Outlook 2010 with Projections to 2035 - Graphic Data Annual Energy Outlook 2010 with Projections to 2035 Graphic Data Figure 1. U.S. primary energy consumption, 1980-2035 Figure 1 Data Figure 2. U.S. liquid fuels supply, 1970-2035 Figure 2 Data Figure 3. U.S. natural gas supply, 1990-2035 Figure 3 Data Figure 4. U.S. energy-related carbon dioxide emissions, 2008 and 2035 Figure 4 Data Figure 5. Projected average fleet-wide fuel economy and CO2-equivalent emissions compliance levels for passenger cars, model year 2016 Figure 5 Data Figure 6. Projected average fleet-wide fuel economy and CO2-equivalent emissions compliance levels for light trucks, model year 2016 Figure 6 Data Figure 7. Total energy consumption in three cases, 2005-2035 Figure 7 Data

310

DOE/EA-1388: Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Shiprock Uranium Mill Tailings Site (September 2001)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

388 388 Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Shiprock Uranium Mill Tailings Site Final September 2001 Prepared by U.S. Department of Energy Grand Junction Office Grand Junction, Colorado Work Performed Under DOE Contract No. DE-AC13-96GJ87335 This Page Intentionally Blank DOE Grand Junction Office EA of Ground Water Compliance at the Shiprock Site September 2001 Final Page iii Contents Page Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................ vii Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... ix 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................1

311

The Effects Of Port Security Compliance On The Competitiveness Of European Union Maritime Industry Firms  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ABSTRACT The Effects Of Port Security Compliance On The Competitiveness Of European Union Maritime Industry Firms. (May 2013) Jonathan Stone Department of Maritime Administration Texas A&M University Research Advisor: Dr. Joan Mileski Department of Maritime Administration Prior research has addressed European Union (EU) water transportation policy and its impact on firm strategy. We extend this research by attempting to measure the effect of port security regulation compliance implementation on the perceived competitiveness of maritime firms located in European Union ports. We ask the question: Can firm specific implementation of required port security compliance enhance or hinder a firms competitive advantage? We use Resource-Based Strategic Theory as a framework for evaluating competitiveness. Resource based theory purports that assets and systems can give a firm a competitive advantage if they follow the VRIN criteria of Valuable, Rare, Inimitable, and Not easily substitutable. We ask via email and snail mail survey instrument whether certain security assets, resources and systems are VRIN and whether these assets, resources and systems give competitive advantage to the firm. The type of resources/assets/systems include physical assets such as fencing; ongoing management assets such as communication systems, planning and structuring management assets such as security planning systems; human assets such as employee knowledge; technological assets such as software protection; intangible assets such as a safety culture and financial assets such as cost savings from security compliance. We administer the instrument to all firms operating in EU ports in 2011-2012. A list of firms is obtained from IHSfairplay Ports and Terminals Guide. The results of the survey shows that most managers do not perceive a competitive advantage was gained in the way security assets/resources/management systems were implemented. However, a strong minority 34.12% of managers did perceive competitive advantage was gained from port security compliance where systems/assets/resources were not easily imitated or the I. Furthermore, managers perceive where they were located within the port as an important advantage to security and competitiveness.

Stone, Jonathan Taylor

2013-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

312

Environmental Compliance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

The Office of Health, Safety and Security HSS Logo Department of Energy Seal Left Tab SEARCH Right Tab TOOLS Right Tab Left Tab HOME Right Tab Left Tab ABOUT US Right Tab Left Tab...

313

Recipient: County of Lancaster, PA ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 Recipient: County of Lancaster, PA ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Lancaster County Environmental Center Energy Efficiency Retrofits A9, All, B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Historic Preservation Clause Engineering Clause **This NEPA determination is limited to lighting upgrades, installation of a PV system; installation of a geothermal heat pump is conditioned pending further NEPA review. Lancaster County Environmental Center Renewable Energy System B5.1 Waste Stream clause Historic Preservation clause Engineering clause County Facility Energy Audits A9 None. This NEPA determination is limited to audits only.

314

Recipient: Lounty of Salt Lake ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Recipient: Lounty of Salt Lake ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Development of Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy All, B5.1 Allowable: Any administrative actions/audits associated with this activity Prohibited: Any implementation of projects/construction activities without NEPA approval from DOE Energy Efficiency Grants to Nonprofits A9, B5.1 Allowable: Any administrative actions/audits associated with this activity Prohibited: Any implementation of projects/construction activities without NEPA approval from DOE Home Performance Energy Star B5.1 Upgrade Planning & Zoning Ordinances for Wind, Solar,

315

Recipient. City of Orlando ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

79 79 Recipient. City of Orlando ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Orlando Science Center Efficiency and Renewable Upgrades and Education A9, All, B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Historical Preservation Clause (EE upgrades, financial leveraging and educational activities only) Transportation Electrification A9, All CX applies to education, outreach, metrics & accountability activities only. (Additional activities unclear but may include infrastructure development of charging stations for PHEV.) Community Energy Efficiency and Weatherization A9, All, B5.1 Waste Stream Clause (Audits w/ weatherization upgrades to low

316

Recipient: County of Henrico, Virginia ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

. EE 000 0871 . EE 000 0871 Recipient: County of Henrico, Virginia ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Energy Improvements, Upgrades and Conservation Improvements (Lighting retrofits and building automation upgrades) B5.1 Waste Stream, Engineering, and Historic Preservation clauses. Additional Comments: NETL forms for both lighting and automation retrofits were submitted. No historic sites will be affected according to these. Most likely works will not imply significant construction or installation of heavy equipment. Based on my review of information conveyed to me and in my possession (or attached) concerning the

317

Recipient: City of San Antonio, Texas ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

970 970 Recipient: City of San Antonio, Texas ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) City Lights B5.1 Waste Stream, and Historical Preservation clauses Community Green Retrofit Program B2.5, B5.1 Engineering, waste stream, and historical preservation clauses. Municipal Facility Retrofit Program B5.1 Engineering, waste stream, and historical preservation clauses. Allowable: Any administrative action/audits associated with this activity. Prohibited: Any implementation of projects/construction activities without approval from DOE. Transportation Enhancement Initiative B5.1 Engineering, waste stream, and historical preservation clauses.

318

Compliance Monitoring of Subyearling Chinook Salmon Survival and Passage at The Dalles Dam, Summer 2012  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this compliance study was to estimate dam passage survival of subyearling Chinook salmon at The Dalles Dam during summer 2012. Under the 2008 Federal Columbia River Power System Biological Opinion, dam passage survival is required to be greater than or equal to 0.93 and estimated with a standard error (SE) less than or equal to 0.015. The study also estimated survival from the forebay 2 km upstream of the dam and through the tailrace to 2 km downstream of the dam, forebay residence time, tailrace egress time, spill passage efficiency (SPE), and fish passage efficiency (FPE), as required by the 2008 Columbia Basin Fish Accords.

Skalski, J. R.; Townsend, Richard L.; Seaburg, Adam; Ploskey, Gene R.; Weiland, Mark A.; Hughes, James S.; Woodley, Christa M.; Deng, Zhiqun; Carlson, Thomas J.; Johnson, Gary E.

2013-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

319

Directory of Certificates of Compliance for dry spent fuel storage casks  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This directory contains Certificates of Compliance for all dry spent fuel storage casks approved by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Summary Reports of each approved cask model. Later directories will contain a list of cask users, and a list of cask locations. The purpose of this directory is to make available a convenient source of information on spent fuel storage casks which have been approved by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Storage of fuel assemblies using these casks must be in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR Part 72.

Not Available

1992-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

320

Federal Facility Compliance Act, Proposed Site Treatment Plan: Background Volume. Executive Summary  

SciTech Connect

This Federal Facility Compliance Act Site Treatment Plan discusses the options of radioactive waste management for Ames Laboratory. This is the background volume which discusses: site history and mission; framework for developing site treatment plans; proposed plan organization and related activities; characterization of mixed waste and waste minimization; low level mixed waste streams and the proposed treatment approach; future generation of TRU and mixed wastes; the adequacy of mixed waste storage facilities; and a summary of the overall DOE activity in the area of disposal of mixed waste treatment residuals.

1995-03-24T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fleet-wide cafe compliance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Environmental implementation plan: Chapter 5, Chemical management, pollution prevention and other compliance programs. Draft revision  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Compliance with environmental regulations and US Department of Energy Orders (DOE) relating to environmental protection is an important part of SRS`s program. Over the past few years, the number of environmental regulations has increased. The strategy to comply with new and existing environmental regulations and DOE orders is described in chapter two. In this chapter, the following environmental programs are described: Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA); Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA); Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA); and SPCC/BMP/Pollution Prevention Plans;The implementation section identifies issues and those responsible to achieve defined objectives.

Peterson, G.L. [comp.

1993-11-18T23:59:59.000Z

322

Case History of a Clean Water Act Compliance Agreement at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site near Golden, Colorado  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A major Clean Water Act (CWA) Federal Facilities Compliance Agreement was signed on March 25, 1991 by the US Department of Energy, Rocky Flats Field Office (DOE, RFFO) and the Water Enforcement Division of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region VIII. The agreement revised the Rocky Flats Plant`s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and arose from pemittee-requested changes in effluent monitoring points and permit violations, most notably the February 22, 1989 Chromic Acid Incident. The Rocky Flats Plant, now called the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (Site) near Golden Colorado was operated at that time by Rockwell International Corporation, who later plead guilty to six misdemeanor and felony counts of the CWA (the aforementioned NPDES permit violations) and paid a $4 million fine on March 26, 1992. The Compliance Agreement, hereafter referred to as the NPDES FFCA, called for three separate remedial action plans and contained a schedule for their submittal to the EPA. The compliance plans focussed on: (1) Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) performance upgrades, (2) source control and surface water protection, and (3) characterization of the impacts from past sludge disposal practices. Projects that implemented the compliance plans were initiated soon after submittal to the EPA and are forecast to complete in 1997 at a total cost of over $35 million. This paper presents a case history of NPDES FFCA compliance projects and highlights the successes, failures, and lessons learned.

Thompson, J.S.

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

323

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard ¬タモ First Quarter FY2010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1ST-QUARTER-FY-10-REGULATORY-COMPLIANCE-SCORECARD-05-06-10.xlsx 1ST-QUARTER-FY-10-REGULATORY-COMPLIANCE-SCORECARD-05-06-10.xlsx Page 1 of 60 EA MILESTONES MET DURING QUARTER (10/2009 - 12/2009) / TOTAL QUARTER EA MILESTONES ON SCHEDULE EA MILESTONES NEXT FOUR QUARTERS (01/2010 - 12/2010) / TOTAL FOUR QUARTERS EA MILESTONES Argonne GREEN N / A (0 / 0) N / A (0 / 0) N / A N / A N / A Brookhaven GREEN GREEN (1 / 1) GREEN (1 / 1) N / A N / A N / A Carlsbad 1 previous Non-Impacting State NOV (with minor fine), 1 previous Non-Impacting State NOV, & 1 previous ORPS Notification (awaiting NMED formal response) N / A (0 / 0) N / A (0 / 0) N / A N / A SA Completed ETEC GREEN GREEN (0 / 0) GREEN (0 / 0) N / A N / A EIS Idaho GREEN GREEN (1 / 1) GREEN (2 / 2) N / A PA Revision ROD LANL 1 previous Impacting State Stipulated Penalty Demand Letter, for a

324

Technical assessment of TRUSAF for compliance with work place air sampling. Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this Technical Work Document is to satisfy WHC-CM-1-6, the ``WHC Radiological Control Manual.`` This first revision of the original Supporting Document covers the period from January 1, 1994 to December 31, 1994. WHC-CM-1-6 is the primary guidance for radiological control at Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC). As such, it complies with Title 10, Part 835 of the Code of Federal Regulations. In addition to WHC-CM-1-6, there is HSRCM-1, the ``Hanford Site Radiological Control Manual`` and several Department of Energy (DOE) Orders, national consensus standards, and reports that provide criteria, standards, and requirements for workplace air sampling programs. This document provides a summary of these, as they apply to WHC facility workplace air sampling programs. this document also provides an evaluation of the compliance of the TRUSAF workplace air sampling program to the criteria, standards, and requirements and documents. Where necessary, it also indicates changes needed to bring specific locations into compliance.

Butler, J.D.

1995-01-23T23:59:59.000Z

325

Implementing an integrated standards-based management system to ensure compliance at Los Alamos National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL or the Laboratory) is developing and implementing a comprehensive, Integrated Standards-Based Management System (ISBMS) to enhance environmental, safety, and health (ESH) compliance efforts and streamline management of ESH throughout the Laboratory. The Laboratory recognizes that to be competitive in today`s business environment and attractive to potential Partnerships, Laboratory operations must be efficient and cost-effective. The Laboratory also realizes potential growth opportunities for developing ESH as a strength in providing new or improved services to its customers. Overall, the Laboratory desires to establish and build upon an ESH management system which ensures continuous improvement in protecting public health and safety and the environment and which fosters a working relationship with stakeholders. A team of process experts from the LANL Environmental Management (EM) Program Office, worked with management system consultants, and the Department of Energy (DOE) to develop an ESH management systems process to compare current LANL ESH management Systems and programs against leading industry standards. The process enabled the Laboratory to gauge its performance in each of the following areas: Planning and Policy Setting; Systems and Procedures; Implementation and Education; and Monitoring and Reporting. The information gathered on ESH management systems enabled LANL to pinpoint and prioritize opportunities for improvement in the provision of ESH services throughout the Laboratory and ultimately overall ESH compliance.

Hjeresen, D.; Roybal, S.; Bertino, P.; Gherman, C.; Hosteny, B.

1995-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

326

SRS ES&H standards compliance program management plan. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

On March 8, 1990, the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) issued Recommendation 90-2 to the Secretary of Energy. This recommendation, based upon the DNFSB`s initial review and evaluation of the content and implementation of standards relating to the design, construction, operations, and decommissioning of defense nuclear facilities of the Department of Energy (DOE), called for three actions: (1) identification of specific standards that apply to design, construction, operation and decommissioning of DOE facilities; (2) assessment of the adequacy of those standards for protecting public health and safety; and (3) determination of the extent to which they have and are being implemented. This document defines the elements of the SRS program required to support the HQ program in response to DNFSB Recommendation 90-2. The objective is to ensure a consistent approach for all sitewide ES and H Standards Compliance Program efforts that satisfied the intent of Recommendation 90-2 and the HQ 90-2 Implementation Plan in a cost-effective manner. The methodology and instructions for implementation of the SRS program are contained in the Standards Compliance Program Implementation Plan. The Management Plan shall be used in conjunction with the Implementation Plan.

Hearn, W.H.

1993-09-08T23:59:59.000Z

327

Compliance and Verification of Standards and Labeling Programs in China: Lessons Learned  

SciTech Connect

After implementing several energy efficiency standards and labels (30 products covered by MEPS, 50 products covered by voluntary labels and 19 products by mandatory labels), the China National Institute of Standardization (CNIS) is now implementing verification and compliance mechanism to ensure that the energy information of labeled products comply with the requirements of their labels. CNIS is doing so by organizing check testing on a random basis for room air-conditioners, refrigerators, motors, heaters, computer displays, ovens, and self -ballasted lamps. The purpose of the check testing is to understand the implementation of the Chinese labeling scheme and help local authorities establishing effective compliance mechanisms. In addition, to ensure robustness and consistency of testing results, CNIS has coordinated a round robin testing for room air conditioners. Eight laboratories (Chinese (6), Australian (1) and Japanese (1)) have been involved in the round robin testing and tests were performed on four sets of samples selected from manufacturer's production line. This paper describes the methodology used in undertaking both check and round robin testing, provides analysis of testing results and reports on the findings. The analysis of both check and round robin testing demonstrated the benefits of a regularized verification and monitoring system for both laboratories and products such as (i) identifying the possible deviations between laboratories to correct them, (ii) improving the quality of testing facilities, (iii) ensuring the accuracy and reliability of energy label information in order to strength the social credibility of the labeling program and the enforcement mechanism in place.

Saheb, Yamina; Zhou, Nan; Fridley, David; Pierrot, Andre

2010-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

328

Compliance and Verification of Standards and Labelling Programs in China: Lessons Learned  

SciTech Connect

After implementing several energy efficiency standards and labels (30 products covered by MEPS, 50 products covered by voluntary labels and 19 products by mandatory labels), the China National Institute of Standardization (CNIS) is now implementing verification and compliance mechanism to ensure that the energy information of labeled products comply with the requirements of their labels. CNIS is doing so by organizing check testing on a random basis for room air-conditioners, refrigerators, motors, heaters, computer displays, ovens, and self -ballasted lamps. The purpose of the check testing is to understand the implementation of the Chinese labeling scheme and help local authorities establishing effective compliance mechanisms. In addition, to ensure robustness and consistency of testing results, CNIS has coordinated a round robin testing for room air conditioners. Eight laboratories (Chinese (6), Australian (1) and Japanese (1)) have been involved in the round robin testing and tests were performed on four sets of samples selected from manufacturer?s production line. This paper describes the methodology used in undertaking both check and round robin testing, provides analysis of testing results and reports on the findings. The analysis of both check and round robin testing demonstrated the benefits of a regularized verification and monitoring system for both laboratories and products such as (i) identifying the possible deviations between laboratories to correct them, (ii) improving the quality of testing facilities, (iii) ensuring the accuracy and reliability of energy label information in order to strength the social credibility of the labeling program and the enforcement mechanism in place.

Saheb, Yamina; Zhou, Nan; Fridley, David; Pierrot, Andr& #233

2010-06-11T23:59:59.000Z

329

Baseline Design Compliance Matrix for the Rotary Mode Core Sampling System  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of the design compliance matrix (DCM) is to provide a single-source document of all design requirements associated with the fifteen subsystems that make up the rotary mode core sampling (RMCS) system. It is intended to be the baseline requirement document for the RMCS system and to be used in governing all future design and design verification activities associated with it. This document is the DCM for the RMCS system used on Hanford single-shell radioactive waste storage tanks. This includes the Exhauster System, Rotary Mode Core Sample Trucks, Universal Sampling System, Diesel Generator System, Distribution Trailer, X-Ray Cart System, Breathing Air Compressor, Nitrogen Supply Trailer, Casks and Cask Truck, Service Trailer, Core Sampling Riser Equipment, Core Sampling Support Trucks, Foot Clamp, Ramps and Platforms and Purged Camera System. Excluded items are tools such as light plants and light stands. Other items such as the breather inlet filter are covered by a different design baseline. In this case, the inlet breather filter is covered by the Tank Farms Design Compliance Matrix.

LECHELT, J.A.

2000-10-17T23:59:59.000Z

330

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard ¬タモ Fourth Quarter FY2009  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4TH-QUARTER-FY-2009-REGULATORY-COMPLIANCE-SCORECARD-02-19-10.xls 4TH-QUARTER-FY-2009-REGULATORY-COMPLIANCE-SCORECARD-02-19-10.xls Page 1 of 58 EA MILESTONES MISSED DURING QUARTER (07/2009 - 09/2009) / TOTAL QUARTER EA MILESTONES AT RISK EA MILESTONES NEXT FOUR QUARTERS (10/2009 - 09/2010) / TOTAL FOUR QUARTERS EA MILESTONES Argonne GREEN N / A (0 / 0) N / A (0 / 0) N / A N / A N / A Brookhaven GREEN GREEN (0 / 0) GREEN (0 / 1) N / A N / A N / A Carlsbad 1 previous Non-Impacting State NOV (with minor fine), 1 previous Non-Impacting State NOV, & 1 previous ORPS Notification (awaiting NMED formal response) GREEN (0 / 0) GREEN (0 / 0) N / A N / A SA Completed ETEC GREEN GREEN (0 / 0) GREEN (0 / 0) N / A N / A EIS Idaho GREEN GREEN (0 / 2) GREEN (0 / 3) N / A PA Revision ROD LANL 1 previous Impacting State Stipulated Penalty Demand Letter, for a

331

Federal Register Vol. 76 No. 44, 12422-12505- Energy Conservation Program: Certification, Compliance, and Enforcement for Consumer Products and Commercial and Industrial Equipment (March 7, 2011)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Federal Register Vol. 76 No. 44, 12422-12505 - Energy Conservation Program: Certification, Compliance, and Enforcement for Consumer Products and Commercial and Industrial Equipment (March 7, 2011)....

332

DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE O 451.1B National Environmental Policy Act Compliance Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1.1B 1.1B NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT COMPLIANCE PROGRAM ALBUQUERQUE OPERATIONS OFFICE Change No: 1 DOE O 451.1B Level: Familiar Date: 6/15/01 1 DOE O 451.1B NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) COMPLIANCE PROGRAM FAMILIAR LEVEL _________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTIVES Given DOE O 451.1B, you will be able to do the following: 1. List the objectives of DOE O 451.1B, National Environmental Policy Act Compliance Program. 2. State the requirements for all DOE elements specified in this Order. 3. Explain why this Order does not contain any requirements for contractors. 4. List the responsibilities associated with this Order for these positions: § Secretarial Officer and head of field organization

333

Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement Powerpoint Presentation for ASHRAE Conference, January 31, 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Buildings Regulatory Program Buildings Regulatory Program Buildings Regulatory Program Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement John Cymbalsky, Ashley Armstrong, and Laura Barhydt US Department of Energy January 31, 2011 Presentation Outline Presentation Outline * Upcoming Relevant Rulemakings * Changes to Rulemaking Process * Executive Order 13563 * Overview of Compliance, Certification, and Enforcement * Detailed Questions and Answers 2 | U.S. Department of Energy energy.gov Long Term Schedules for Certain HVAC Rulemakings Long Term Schedules for Certain HVAC Rulemakings Appliance Standards Product Categories Driver Approx. Rule Initiation Date Final Action Date Heating Products Rulemakings Residential Water Heaters, Direct Heating Equipment, and Pool

334

Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement Powerpoint Presentation for ASHRAE Conference, January 31, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Buildings Regulatory Program Buildings Regulatory Program Buildings Regulatory Program Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement John Cymbalsky, Ashley Armstrong, and Laura Barhydt US Department of Energy January 31, 2011 Presentation Outline Presentation Outline * Upcoming Relevant Rulemakings * Changes to Rulemaking Process * Executive Order 13563 * Overview of Compliance, Certification, and Enforcement * Detailed Questions and Answers 2 | U.S. Department of Energy energy.gov Long Term Schedules for Certain HVAC Rulemakings Long Term Schedules for Certain HVAC Rulemakings Appliance Standards Product Categories Driver Approx. Rule Initiation Date Final Action Date Heating Products Rulemakings Residential Water Heaters, Direct Heating Equipment, and Pool

335

"Annual NEPA Planning Summary Status of Ongoing NEPA Compliance Activities - Environmental Impact Statements"  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Status of Ongoing NEPA Compliance Activities - Environmental Impact Statements" "Bonneville Power Administration Annual NEPA Planning Summary Status of Ongoing NEPA Compliance Activities Environmental Impact Statements" "application/vnd.ms-excel" "#","*Title, Location","Estimated Cost","Estimated Schedule (**NEPA Milestones)",,"Description" ,"I-5 Corridor Reinforcement Project Cowlitz and Clark Counties, WA and Multnomah County, OR",5000000,"Determination Date:","application/vnd.ms-excel"," Construct about 70 miles of new 500-kV line between a new proposed substation near Castle Rock, WA and an exsting BPA substation in Troutdale, OR"

336

Yucca Mountain Licensing Standard Options for Very Long Time Frames: Technical Bases for the Standard and Compliance Assessments  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In the existing U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulations governing the spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, the time period of compliance was set at 10,000 years. Recently, a Court ordered that EPA and NRC either revise the regulation on this topic to be "based upon and consistent with" recommendations made by a panel of the National Academy of Sciences, who recommended a time period of compliance out to ...

2005-04-11T23:59:59.000Z

337

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program Fiscal Year 2002 Report (Part Two of Two)  

SciTech Connect

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance program, funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Operations Office, monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada Test Site (NTS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NTS biota. This report summarizes the program's activities conducted by Bechtel Nevada (BN) during fiscal year 2002. Program activities included: (1) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (2) desert tortoise compliance, (3) ecosystem mapping and data management, (4) sensitive species and unique habitat monitoring, and (5) biological monitoring at the HAZMAT Spill Center. Biological surveys for the presence of sensitive species and important biological resources were conducted for 26 NTS projects. These projects have the potential to disturb a total of 374 acres. Thirteen of the projects were in desert tortoise habitat, and 13.38 acres of desert tortoise habitat were disturbed. No tortoises were found in or displaced from project areas, and no tortoises were accidentally injured or killed at project areas or along paved roads. Compilation of historical wildlife data continued this year in efforts to develop faunal distribution maps for the NTS. Photographs associated with the NTS ecological landform units sampled to create the NTS vegetation maps were cataloged for future retrieval and analysis. The list of sensitive plant species for which long-term population monitoring is scheduled was revised. Six vascular plants and five mosses were added to the list. Plant density estimates from ten populations of Astragalus beatleyae were collected, and eight known populations of Eriogonum concinnum were visited to assess plant and habitat status. Minimal field monitoring of western burrowing owl burrows occurred. A report relating to the ecology of the western burrowing owl on the Nevada Test Site was prepared which summarizes four years of data collected on this species' distribution, burrow use, reproduction, activity patterns, and food habits. Bat roost sites within seven buildings slated for demolition were identified, and a BN biologist was a contributing author of the Nevada Bat Conservation Plan published by the Nevada Bat Working Group. Thirty-three adult horses and five foals were counted this year. Six active raptor nests (two American kestrel, two Red-tailed hawk, and two Great-horned owl nests) were found and monitored this year. Selected wetlands and man-made water sources were monitored for physical parameters and wildlife use. No dead animals were observed this year in any plastic-lined sump. The chemical release test plan for one experiment at the HAZMAT Spill Center on Frenchman Lake playa was reviewed. Seasonal sampling of downwind and upwind transects near the spill center was conducted to document baseline conditions of biota.

C. A. Wills

2002-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

338

Recipient: County ut Pinal, AZ ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 Recipient: County ut Pinal, AZ ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Activity 1 - Energy Efficiency Audits A9, All This NEPA determination is limited to conducting audits/compiling the results of the audits/and making recommendations only. (see Activity 4 for audit implementation activities) Activity 2 - Energy Efficiency Municipal Partnership A9, All, B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Historic Preservation Clause Engineering clause Activity 3 - Ironwood-Gantzel Roadway Traffic Lights Synchronization A9 None Activity 4 - Energy Efficiency Corrective Measures Implementation A9, All, B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Historic Preservation Clause

339

Recipient: County of Washington, Oregon ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

25 25 Recipient: County of Washington, Oregon ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Wa. Co. EE&C Project for County Facilities and Land Use and Transportation Development A9 B5.1 Waste stream Clause Historical Preservation Clause Engineering Clause (Installation of rooftop PV systems onto county government buildings) Energy Efficiency Retrofits B2.5 B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Historical Preservation Clause (EE retrofits and lighting replacements) Energy Efficiency and Conservation Development Project - Transportation A9 All CX applies to administration, planning, siting and developing of a bike, trail and pedestrian system.

340

Recipient: County of McHenry, IL ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

21 21 Recipient: County of McHenry, IL ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Project #1: Daylighting B5.1 None Project #2: Occupancy Sensors B5.1 None Project #3: Administration Building - LED Parking Lot Lighting B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Project #4: Annex A - Replace Hot Water Boiler B5.1 Waste Stream Clause *boiler replacements cannot result in a net increase in air emissions. Project #5: Annex A - Window Film B5.1 None Project #6: Department of Transportation Building - Skylights B5.1 Historic Preservation Clause Waste Stream Clause Project #7: Department of Transportation Building - HID to T8 Fluorescent with Occupancy Sensors

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fleet-wide cafe compliance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

DOE-STD-1156-2002; Environmental Compliance Function Area Qualification Standard  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6-2002 6-2002 October 2002 DOE STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1156-2002 This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1156-2002

342

Recipient: City of Chandler, Arizona ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

36 36 Recipient: City of Chandler, Arizona ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Replacement of Inefficient HVAC Systems in City Buildings and Facilities B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Historic Preservation clause Engineering Clause *Boiler replacement cannot result in a net increase in air emissions. Replace interior lighting and controls in City buildings B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Historic Preservation clause Replace exterior windows at the Chandler Municipal Court with high efficiency windows B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Historic Preservation clause Installation of LED Exterior Parking Lot, Walkway and Area Lighting B5.1 Waste Stream Clause

343

Analysis of the Impacts of an Early Start for Compliance with the Kyoto Protocol  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

2 2 Analysis of the Impacts of an Early Start for Compliance with the Kyoto Protocol July 1999 Energy Information Administration Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 This report was prepared by the Energy Information Administration, the independent statistical and analytical agency within the Department of Energy. The information contained herein should be attributed to the Energy Information Administration and should not be construed as advocating or reflecting any policy position of the Department of Energy or of any other organization. Service Reports are prepared by the Energy Information Administration upon special request and are based on assumptions specified by the requester. Preface The analysis in this report was undertaken at the request of the Committee on Science of the U.S.

344

Recipient: City of Laredo, Texas ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

67 67 Recipient: City of Laredo, Texas ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Administration A9, All None. Downtown Lighting Retrofit B5.1 Waste stream clause Historical preservation clause Downtown Solar Trash Compactor 65.1 Waste stream clause Historical preservation clause Hillside Recreation Center Alternative Energy Project B5.1 Waste stream clause Historical preservation clause Engineering clause Energy Efficiency Revolving Loan Fund A9, All, B5.1 All administrative activities, audits, outreach, and technical advice should be CX'd. All EE activities are subject to the Waste Stream Clause, Historic Preservation clause, and Engineering clause.

345

Recipient: County of Kitsap, WA ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

it: EE 000 0853 it: EE 000 0853 Recipient: County of Kitsap, WA ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Kitsap Built Green Projects B5.1 Waste Stream, Engineering, and Historic Preservation clauses. Kitsap County Building Retrofits and Energy Efficiency Upgrades (Green Jobs Initiative) B5.1 except geothermal Waste Stream, Engineering, and Historic Preservation clauses. Prohibited: Any implementation of geothermal projects/construction activities without NEPA approval from DOE. Geothermal projects are to be provided to DOE for analysis. Energy Efficiency Implementation and Strategy A9, All, B5.1 None Energy Services Corps A9, All, B5.1

346

Recipient: County of Howard, MD ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Recipient: County of Howard, MD ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Electric Pick-up truck for on- site use at Alpha Ridge Landfill B5.1 None Landfill Forced Draft Heater A9 This CX applies to preliminary engineering and design tasks only. Additional information is required to make a NEPA determination for construction and operation tasks. Diesel Hybrid Truck B5.1 None Home Energy Audits A9 None Park Ballfield Lights Energy Efficiency B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Energy Efficiency Analysis via Monitoring of Sub-Meters Installation B5.1 None Energy Management Consultant A9 None High Efficiency Lighting - Rec & Parks B5.1

347

Recipient: City of Riverside ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Award #: EE 000 0872 Award #: EE 000 0872 Recipient: City of Riverside ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Project 1-Government Facility Retrofits A9, All, B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Historic Preservation Clause Engineering Clause **boiler replacement cannot result in a net increase in air emissions. Project 2 - Foreclosed Home - Green Rehab Program A9, All, B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Historic Preservation Clause Engineering Clause Project 3-PC Power Management Software Rebate Program A9, All, B5.1 None. Project 4-Specific Plan Updates A9, All None. Project 6-Solar Trash Compactor Technologies B5.1 Waste Stream clause Project 7-PV electric vehicle

348

H-35 DOE-H-__ Compliance With Internet Protocol Version 6 (Ipv6) In Acquiring Information  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

as appropriate. Consider using in solicitations involving M&O as appropriate. Consider using in solicitations involving M&O contracts, management of major facilities, and any acquisition which could involve the direct or indirect purchase of Information Technology equipment that uses Internet Protocol (IP) technology. DOE-H-__ COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNET PROTOCOL VERSION 6 (IPV6) IN ACQUIRING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (JULY 2011) This contract involves the acquisition of Information Technology (IT) that uses Internet Protocol (IP) technology. The Contractor agrees that (1) all deliverables that involve IT that uses IP (products, services, software, etc.) comply with IPv6 standards and interoperate with both IPv6 and IPv4 systems and products; and (2) it has IPv6 technical support for fielded product management, development and

349

Recipient: City of Arlingtou, Texas ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

959 959 Recipient: City of Arlingtou, Texas ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Emission Reduction Goal & Climate Action Plan A9, All, B5.1 City Hall Public Space (1st Floor) EE Project B5.1 Waste stream, engineering and historical preservation clauses. City Facility Services Building EE Project B5.1 Waste stream, engineering and historical preservation clauses. Convention Center LED Lighting Upgrade B5.1 Waste stream clause Internal Facilities Lighting Upgrades B5.1 Waste stream, engineering and historical preservation clauses. City Tower EE Project B5.1 Waste stream, engineering and historical preservation clauses.

350

Reci,...ent: County of Pierce ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

851 851 Reci,...ent: County of Pierce ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Sustainability (Energy) Manager A9, All None - Administrative Activity. Conversion of County Traffic Signals to all LED Indications B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Message Display Conversion to LED B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Neighborhood Energy Efficiency and Woodsmoke Reduction A9, B5.1, Waste Stream clause Historic Preservation clause *stove replacement cannot result in a net increase in air emissions. Energy Efficient Storage Upgrade B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Main Jail HVAC System Replacement B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Historic Preservation Clause Engineering Clause

351

A Different Kind of "Deal": Selling Wind as Environmental Compliance; Preprint  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Different Kind of "Deal": Different Kind of "Deal": Selling Wind as Environmental Compliance Preprint May 2003 * NREL/CP-500-33977 C. Tombari Mountain Energy Consultation LLC K. Sinclair National Renewable Energy Laboratory To be presented at WINDPOWER 2003 Austin, Texas May 18-21, 2003 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 NREL is a U.S. Department of Energy Laboratory Operated by Midwest Research Institute * Battelle * Bechtel Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 NOTICE The submitted manuscript has been offered by an employee of the Midwest Research Institute (MRI), a contractor of the US Government under Contract No. DE-AC36-99GO10337. Accordingly, the US Government and MRI retain a nonexclusive royalty-free license to publish or reproduce the published

352

Recipient: St. Paul, Minnesota ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

755 755 Recipient: St. Paul, Minnesota ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Saint Paul Energy Smart Homes A9, All, B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Historic Preservation Clause Engineering Clause Multi Family Energy Rehab Pilot Program B5.1 Waste Stream Clause LED Street Light Retrofit B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Energy Efficiency in Municipal Facilities A9, B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Historic Preservation Clause Engineering Clause Commercial & Industrial Building Energy Efficiency A9, All All administrative actions, audits, technical advice, and outreach should be CX'd; implementation of projects under this activity should be conditioned pending

353

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance Guide Volume 2 - Department of Energy NEPA Regulations and Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

memorandum memorandum u DATE: REPLY TO AllN OP: SUSJECT TO. August 16, 1994 Office ofNEPA Oversight: EH-25:Lichtman:500-401 O Environmental Assessment Checklkt Secretarial Officers and Heads of Field Offices This memorandum transmits a new Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Assessment Checklist, prepared by the OMCS of Environment, Safety and Health to assist DOE components in cartying outtheir responsibilities undertheNational Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). A draft of this checklist was distributed for review and comment at the NEPA Compliance Officers meeting in February 1994. Although there is no requirement to use this checklist, we belleve it is a useful tool in the preparation and review of DOE environmental assessments.Nevertheless, a checklist approach has certain inherent limitations, as discussed on page 1. Some NEPA practitioners may find this checklist has

354

Surveillance Guide - ERS 14.1 Satellite Accumulation Ares (RCRA Compliance)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SATELLITE ACCUMULATION AREAS SATELLITE ACCUMULATION AREAS 1.0 Objective The objective of this surveillance is to evaluate the effectiveness of the contractor's management of hazardous and mixed wastes in satellite accumulation areas. The Facility Representative evaluates compliance with DOE requirements as well as requirements of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and the Washington State Administrative Code. During this surveillance, the Facility Representative conducts a walk through of a satellite accumulation area and reviews the pertinent records. 2.0 References 2.1 40 CFR 260-270 2.2 Washington Administrative Code, Chapters 173-303 2.3 DOE 5400.3, Hazardous and Radioactive Mixed Waste Program 2.4 DOE 5820.2A, Radioactive Waste Management. 2.5 DOE/EH - 0333, Management of Hazardous Waste

355

The Impact of Environmental Compliance Costs on U.S. Refining Profitability 1995-2001  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Impact of Environmental Impact of Environmental Compliance Costs on U.S. Refining Profitability 1995-2001 May 2003 Energy Information Administration Office of Energy Markets and End Use U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 This report was prepared by the Energy Information Administration, the independent statistical and analytical agency within the Department of Energy. The information contained herein should not be construed as advocating or reflecting any policy position of the Department of Energy or any other organization. Contacts This report was prepared in the Office of Energy Markets and End Use of the Energy Information Administration (EIA), U.S. Department of Energy, under the general direction of W. Calvin Kilgore. The project was directed by Mark E. Rodekohr, Director

356

Multiplying decomposition of stress/strain, constitutive/compliance relations, and strain energy  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

To account for phenomenological theories and a set of invariants, stress and strain are usually decomposed into a pair of pressure and deviatoric stress and a pair of volumetric strain and deviatoric strain. However, the conventional decomposition method only focuses on individual stress and strain, so that cannot be directly applied to either formulation in Finite Element Method (FEM) or Boundary Element Method (BEM). In this paper, a simpler, more general, and widely applicable decomposition is suggested. A new decomposition method adopts multiplying decomposition tensors or matrices to not only stress and strain but also constitutive and compliance relation. With this, we also show its practical usage on FEM and BEM in terms of tensors and matrices.

HyunSuk Lee; Jinkyu Kim

2012-11-12T23:59:59.000Z

357

LLNL Compliance Plan for TRUPACT-2 Authorized Methods for Payload Control  

SciTech Connect

This document describes payload control at LLNL to ensure that all shipments of CH-TRU waste in the TRUPACT-II (Transuranic Package Transporter-II) meet the requirements of the TRUPACT-II SARP (safety report for packaging). This document also provides specific instructions for the selection of authorized payloads once individual payload containers are qualified for transport. The physical assembly of the qualified payload and operating procedures for the use of the TRUPACT-II, including loading and unloading operations, are described in HWM Procedure No. 204, based on the information in the TRUPACT-II SARP. The LLNL TRAMPAC, along with the TRUPACT-II operating procedures contained in HWM Procedure No. 204, meet the documentation needs for the use of the TRUPACT-II at LLNL. Table 14-1 provides a summary of the LLNL waste generation and certification procedures as they relate to TRUPACT-II payload compliance.

NONE

1995-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

358

Energy Efficient Service Delivery in Clouds in Compliance with the Kyoto Protocol  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Cloud computing is revolutionizing the ICT landscape by providing scalable and efficient computing resources on demand. The ICT industry - especially data centers, are responsible for considerable amounts of CO2 emissions and will very soon be faced with legislative restrictions, such as the Kyoto protocol, defining caps at different organizational levels (country, industry branch etc.) A lot has been done around energy efficient data centers, yet there is very little work done in defining flexible models considering CO2. In this paper we present a first attempt of modeling data centers in compliance with the Kyoto protocol. We discuss a novel approach for trading credits for emission reductions across data centers to comply with their constraints. CO2 caps can be integrated with Service Level Agreements and juxtaposed to other computing commodities (e.g. computational power, storage), setting a foundation for implementing next-generation schedulers and pricing models that support Kyoto-compliant CO2 trading ...

Lucanin, Drazen; Mastelic, Toni; Brandic, Ivona

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

359

Compliance Monitoring of Juvenile Subyearling Chinook Salmon Survival and Passage at The Dalles Dam, Summer 2010  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this compliance study was to estimate dam passage survival of subyearling Chinook salmon smolts at The Dalles Dam during summer 2010. Under the 2008 Federal Columbia River Power System (FCRPS) Biological Opinion (BiOp), dam passage survival should be greater than or equal to 0.93 and estimated with a standard error (SE) less than or equal 0.015. The study also estimated smolt passage survival from the forebay 2 km upstream of the dam to the tailrace 2 km below the dam The forebay-to-tailrace survival estimate satisfies the BRZ-to-BRZ survival estimate called for in the Fish Accords. , as well as the forebay residence time, tailrace egress time, and spill passage efficiency, as required in the Columbia Basin Fish Accords. The estimate of dam survival for subyearling Chinook salmon at The Dalles in 2010 was 0.9404 with an associated standard error of 0.0091.

Johnson, Gary E.; Carlson, Thomas J.; Skalski, John R.

2010-12-21T23:59:59.000Z

360

USDOE energy standard compliance test on two-story office building  

SciTech Connect

There exists some skepticism in the design community regarding the ability to design an aesthetically pleasing building that meets the interim energy conservation standard for new commercial buildings initiated by the US Department of Energy. In response to this, a study was undertaken to demonstrate that compliance with energy standards does not mean giving up the architectural intent of a building. An unusual and architecturally pleasing building design was chosen for this study. This two-story office building has a large, central atrium, made almost entirely of glass. It is the building`s focal point, lending an inviting atmosphere to the interior spaces but also poses a considerable challenge to the HVAC system to keep the building comfortable. The building was simulated and easily complied with the Standard, based on an annual energy cost comparison. Alterations to the original design affected neither the interior floor plan nor exterior elevations.

Bailey, S.A.

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fleet-wide cafe compliance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Federal Facility Compliance Act: Conceptual Site Treatment Plan for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) is required by section 3021(b) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended by the Federal Facility Compliance Act (the Act), to prepare plans describing the development of treatment capacities and technologies for treating mixed waste. The Act requires site treatment plans (STPs or plans) to be developed for each site at which DOE generates or stores mixed waste and submitted to the State or EPA for approval, approval with modification, or disapproval. The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Conceptual Site Treatment Plan (CSTP) is the preliminary version of the plan required by the Act and is being provided to California, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and others for review. A list of the other DOE sites preparing CSTPs is included in Appendix 1.1 of this document. Please note that Appendix 1.1 appears as Appendix A, pages A-1 and A-2 in this document.

Not Available

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

362

Recipient: City of Irvine ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

865 865 Recipient: City of Irvine ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Community Funding and Retrofit Program A9 All None (Program development activities only - implementation of retrofits will not occur under this activity.) Sustainable Facilities Management Training A9 All None (Training and reporting activities only) Portfolio Manager Training A9 All None (Training and reporting activities only) Web-Based Monitoring A8 A9 All None (Training, monitoring and reporting activities only) Sports Field lighting Retrofits B5.1 Waste Stream Clause (Replacement of existing fixtures and controls) Climate Action Plan Environmental Impact Report

363

Federal Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August 8, 1996 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on Storage of on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August 8, 1996 State Washington Agreement Type Federal Facility Compliance Agreement Legal Driver(s) TSCA Scope Summary Address DOE and the NNPP's inability to comply at this time with the regulations in 40 Parties DOE; US EPA; US Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program (NNPP) Date 8/8/1996 SCOPE * Address DOE and the NNPP's inability to comply at this time with the regulations in 40 CFR 761.65(a), which require polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) stored for disposal to be removed from storage and disposed of within one year of being placed in storage, and the Department of Transportation (DOT) container specifications in 40 CFR 761.65(c)(6). ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * Annually, starting six months after the effective date of this Agreement, DOE and the

364

Recipient: Lay of Salt Lake ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Recipient: Lay of Salt Lake ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Energy Efficiency Policy Development and Planning A9, All None. Energy Efficiency Outreach and Education A9, All None. Salt Lake City Energy Efficiency Revolving Loan Fund B5.1 Eligible projects under this activity include lighting equipment upgrades; building control systems; heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment upgrades and/or control systems; and building envelope upgrades. *There are no renewable energy systems associated with this CX. Salt Lake City Traffic Signal Management B5.1 None. Salt Lake City Bicycle Transit Center

365

Different Kind of"Deal": Selling Wind as Environmental Compliance; Preprint  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Supplemental Environmental Projects (SEPs), an environmental regulatory mechanism available at both State and Federal levels, show promise as a marketing venue for wind developers. SEPs are an alternative available to defendants who have been assessed penalties for environmental non-compliance, allowing them to offset a significant amount of penalties by investing in environmentally beneficial projects. In 1999, the dollar value of Federal SEPs negotiated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) totaled$277 million. In addition, cumulative state enforcement actions may be settled with SEPs. Aside from some compressed natural gas projects, no clean energy projects have been undertaken with the funds. Wind and other clean energy developers can play a unique role in introducing wind energy projects into the SEP negotiating process.

Tombari, C.; Sinclair, K.

2003-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

366

Land Disposal Restrictions Treatment Standards: Compliance Strategies for Four Types of Mixed Wastes  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper describes the unique challenges involved in achieving compliance with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (Public Law 94-580) Land Disposal Restrictions (LDR) treatment standards for four types of mixed wastes generated throughout the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) complex: (1) radioactively contaminated lead acid batteries; (2) radioactively contaminated cadmium-, mercury-, and silver-containing batteries; (3) mercury-bearing mixed wastes; and (4) radioactive lead solids. For each of these mixed waste types, the paper identifies the strategy pursued by DOE's Office of Pollution Prevention and Resource Conservation Policy and Guidance (EH-43) in coordination with other DOE elements and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to meet the compliance challenge. Specifically, a regulatory interpretation was obtained from EPA agreeing that the LDR treatment standard for wastes in the D008 'Radioactive Lead Solids' sub-category applies to radioactively contaminated lead acid batteries. For cadmium-, mercury-, and silver-containing batteries, generically applicable treatability variances were obtained from EPA approving macro-encapsulation as the alternative LDR treatment standard for all three battery types. Joint DOE/EPA technology demonstrations were pursued for mercury-bearing mixed wastes in an effort to justify revising the LDR treatment standards, which focus on thermal recovery of mercury for reuse. Because the demonstrations failed to produce enough supporting data for a rulemaking, however, EPA has recommended site-specific treatability variances for particular mercury-bearing mixed waste streams. Finally, DOE has filed an application for a determination of equivalent treatment requesting approval of container-based macro-encapsulation technologies as an alternative LDR treatment standard for radioactive lead solids. Information is provided concerning the length of time required to implement each of these strategies, and suggestions for obtaining variances from the LDR treatment standards at the site-specific level are also discussed. (authors)

Fortune, W.B. [U.S, Department of Energy, Office of Pollution Prevention and Resource Conservation (EH-43), 1000 Independence Ave., S.W., Washington, DC 20585 (United States); Ranek, N.L. [Argonne National Laboratory, Environmental Science Division, 955 L'Enfant Plaza North, Suite 6000, Washington, DC 20024 (United States)

2006-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

367

HIPAA Security Job-Specific Training Module -Strong Health Page 1 of 2 HIPAA Security Compliance, v.1 (3/05) 0S1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

HIPAA Security Job-Specific Training Module - Strong Health Page 1 of 2 HIPAA Security Compliance, v.1 (3/05) 0S1 URMC/Strong Health HIPAA Security Training Module POLICY SUMMARY: 0S1 (for full policy, refer to http://intranet.urmc.rochester.edu/policy/HIPAA/ ) HIPAA Security Compliance

Goldman, Steven A.

368

The roles of self-concept clarity and psychological reactance in compliance with product and service recommendations  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This article investigates the effects of self-concept clarity (the extent to which self-knowledge is clearly and confidently defined, internally consistent, and temporally stable) and psychological reactance (the adoption of or strengthening a view or ... Keywords: Compliance, Product recommendation, Psychological reactance, Purchase involvement, Self-concept clarity

Gyudong Lee; Jaeeun Lee; Clive Sanford

2010-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

369

Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal Environmental Compliance Program: Donald C. Cook Nuclear Case Study, Phase 1--Preliminary Planni ng  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report describes preliminary environmental compliance planning activities that American Electric Power (AEP) is taking to preserve the option of renewing the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant license. The activities are based on a program plan manual published previously by EPRI. The report includes an evaluation of the usefulness of that manual.

1997-07-08T23:59:59.000Z

370

A quasi-experimental evaluation of high-emitter non-compliance and its impact on vehicular  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

-experimental evaluation is employed to assess the compliance behavior of high emitters in response to Atlanta?s Inspection intervention of vehicle inspection and maintenance (IM) programs. 1361-9209/$ - see front matter ? 2005 and Campbell, 1979). Meyer (1995) provides a broad review of the previous quasi-experimental studies used

Vermont, University of

371

Environmental implementation plan: Chapter 14, Environmental compliance tracking and data management. Revision  

SciTech Connect

Environmental projects, issues, and programs have become increasingly important to the Westinghouse Savannah River Company (WSRC) management and the Department of Energy (DOE). A compliance-tracking system has been developed to monitor environmental requirements and commitments because they have become increasingly complex and numerous. An Environmental Data Management (EDM) steering committee was formed in October 1987 to develop computer system solutions to environmental needs. The committee`s main objective is to coordinate, within SRS divisions, the separate efforts that have been or are being developed to meet regulatory requirements and specific programmatic goals. The Environmental and Graphical Information Systems (E&GIS) Program was recently developed to establish a more formal organizational structure and enhance the coordination of geographical information systems (GIS) and environmental data management (EDM) activities at SRS. The general strategy of the program is to establish a coordination focal point for GIS and EDM activities, to provide for the integration of the several environmental and graphical information systems which exist mostly in stand-alone arrangements, and to guide the development of data management and geographical information applications in order to achieve alignment with Site computing architecture and standards. The E&GIS Program will enhance the Site`s ability to respond to data requirements in support of new missions, changing directives, and increasing regulatory requirements.

Story, C.H. [comp.

1993-10-06T23:59:59.000Z

372

COST IMPACT OF SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT COMPLIANCE FOR COMMISSION-REGULATED WATER UTILITIES  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

(NRRI) with funding provided by participating member commissions of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC). The views and opinions of the authors do not necessarily state or reflect the views, opinions, or policies of the NRRI, the NARUC, or NARUC member commissions. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study was prepared for state public utility commissioners and their staff in response to the growing concern about the effect of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) on water utilities under their jurisdiction. Compliance with the SDWA is expected to have a significant impact on water utilities and the rates they charge for service. A sensitivity analysis was developed for this report using a hypothetical water company to identify the costs associated with alternative treatment processes. A total of eighteen different treatment processes are considered, from conventional treatment to granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption and reverse osmosis. Capital costs for these processes range from $100,000 to $3.25 million for a water plant with a designed capacity of one million

Patrick C. Mann; Janice A. Beecher

1989-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

373

Regulatory compliance issues related to the White Oak Creek Embayment time-critical removal action  

SciTech Connect

In September 1990, Martin Marietta Energy Systems (Energy Systems) discovered high levels of Cesium-137 ({sup 137}Cs) in surface sedimenus near the mouth of White Oak Creek Embayment (WOCE). White Oak Creek (WOC) receives surface water drainage from Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Since this discovery, the Department of Energy (DOE) and Energy Systems have pursued actions designed to stabilize the contaminated WOCE sediments under provisions of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), and the implementing regulations in the National Contingency Plan (NCP) (40 CFR Part 300), as a time-critical removal action. By definition, a time-critical removal is an action where onsite activities are initiated within six months of the determination that a removal action is appropriate. Time-critical removal actions allow comparatively rapid mobilization to protect human health and the environment without going through the lengthy and extensive CERCLA Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study/Record of Decision process. Many aspects of the project, in terms of compliance with the substantive requirements of the NCP and ARARs, have exceeded the regulatory requirements, despite the fact that there is no apparent authority on conducting removal actions at Federal facilities. Much of the interpretation of the NCP was groundbreaking in nature for both EPA and DOE. 4 refs., 2 figs.

Leslie, M. (CDM Federal Programs Corp., Oak Ridge, TN (United States)); Kimmel, B.L. (Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States))

1991-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

374

Project W-519 TWRS privatization phase 1 infrastructure year 2000 compliance assessment project plan  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This assessment describes the potential Year 2000 (Y2K) problems and describes the methods for achieving Y2K Compliance for Project W-519, Tank Waste Remediation System Privatization Phase I Infrastructure Support. The purpose of this assessment is to give an overview of the project. This assessment will describe the methods, protocols, and practices to assure that equipment and systems do not have Y2K problems. This document will not be updated and any dates contained in this document are estimates and may change. The scope of project W-519 is to provide utilities and infrastructure to support construction and operation of the private contractor's facility to treat, immobilize, and dispose of tank waste. The private contractor's facility will be located on east side of 200E-area and north of Route 4s (near the defunct grout vaults). The utilities include potable and process water, construction and operational electrical power systems, and liquid effluent disposal transfer lines to the existing effluent treatment facility (ETF) and the liquid effluent retention facility (LERF).

BUSSELL, J.H.

1999-08-25T23:59:59.000Z

375

Trace-gas sensing using the compliance voltage of an external cavity quantum cascade laser  

SciTech Connect

Quantum cascade lasers (QCLs) are increasingly being used to detect, identify, and measure levels of trace gases in the air. External cavity QCLs (ECQCLs) provide a broadly-tunable infrared source to measure absorption spectra of chemicals and provide high detection sensitivity and identification confidence. Applications include detecting chemical warfare agents and toxic industrial chemicals, monitoring building air quality, measuring greenhouse gases for atmospheric research, monitoring and controlling industrial processes, analyzing chemicals in exhaled breath for medical diagnostics, and many more. Compact, portable trace gas sensors enable in-field operation in a wide range of platforms, including handheld units for use by first responders, fixed installations for monitoring air quality, and lightweight sensors for deployment in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). We present experimental demonstration of a new chemical sensing technique based on intracavity absorption in an external cavity quantum cascade laser (ECQCL). This new technique eliminates the need for an infrared photodetector and gas cell by detecting the intracavity absorption spectrum in the compliance voltage of the laser device itself. To demonstrate and characterize the technique, we measure infrared absorption spectra of chemicals including water vapor and Freon-134a. Sub-ppm detection limits in one second are achieved, with the potential for increased sensitivity after further optimization. The technique enables development of handheld, high-sensitivity, and high-accuracy trace gas sensors for in-field use.

Phillips, Mark C.; Taubman, Matthew S.

2013-06-04T23:59:59.000Z

376

Microsoft PowerPoint - NERC Reliability Standards and Mandatory Compliance Presentation to Hydro-Power Conference - June 2007.p  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

NERC Reliability NERC Reliability NERC Reliability NERC Reliability Standards and Standards and Mandatory Compliance Mandatory Compliance Hydro Hydro - - Power Conference Power Conference June 13, 2007 June 13, 2007 Stan Mason Stan Mason 2 EPACT 2005 EPACT 2005 Congress approved the related legislation Congress approved the related legislation in August 2005 in August 2005 It required creation of an Electric It required creation of an Electric Reliability Organization (ERO) to be Reliability Organization (ERO) to be approved by the Federal Energy approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Regulatory Commission (FERC) It mandated Standards that would be It mandated Standards that would be approved by FERC with financial sanctions approved by FERC with financial sanctions

377

Guidance on Compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act for Corrective Actions Conducted under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

K9;07-w) K9;07-w) United State s Governme nt Department of Enerav memorandum DATE: REPLY TO AlT" OF: SUBJECT: TO: December 23, 1997 Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance:Osborne:202-586-4596 Guidance on National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Review for Corrective Actions under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) NEPA Compliance Officers and Assistant Managers for Environmental Management I am pleased to provide the attached guidance on NEPA review for corrective actions under RCRA. This guidance results from the work of a Task Team formed by Environmental Management's NEPA Compliance Officer to study streamlining the NEPA process for RCRA corrective actions, in response to a recommendation in the National Academy of Sciences Report on "Improving the Environment: An Evaluation of DOE'S Environmental

378

June 1,1998, Issue No. 15 For Second Quarter FY 1998 NEPA Compliance Officers Meet in DC  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

,1998, Issue No. 15 For Second Quarter FY 1998 ,1998, Issue No. 15 For Second Quarter FY 1998 NEPA Compliance Officers Meet in DC How can NEPA Compliance Officers (NCOs) become more effective? What can the Offices of Environment, Safety and Health (EH) and General Counsel (GC) do to better support the NCOs? Field and Program NCOs and staff of the Offces of NEPA Policy and Assistance and the Assistant General Counsel for Environment met in Washington, DC, on March 26 and 27 to explore these questions. needs for their Offices and spoke of the value of the Lessons Learned Quarterly Report in Department-wide NEPA coordination. NCOs with tasks under the DOE-wide NEPA support contracts expressed satisfaction that the expected benefits (reduced time and cost) are materializing. A panel told of experiences integrating

379

Energy, Product, and Ecomonic Implications of Environmental Compliance Options- Lessons Learned from a Southern California Case Study  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Industrial plants that are faced with regulated emissions constraints may be able to choose from a complex array of compliance options. Technology options may include a number of pollution control alternatives-retrofits with more efficient equipment, fuel-switching and/or process change to electrotechnologies, or advanced gas-fueled technologies. In some cases, a plant may be able to purchase emission allowances in lieu of changing equipment or adding controls, as would be the case in Southern California with the existing RECLAIM regulations. In such cases, emission allowances could also be sold by plants that achieve emission reductions, offsetting the costs of their technology investments. This paper explores an exhaustive list of compliance options for the manufacturing sector (SICs 20-39). We describe how to collect data and compare options in terms of costs, commercial availability, impacts on energy use, emissions, plant throughput or productivity, product quality control, and other characteristics relevant to selecting an option to implement. We discuss an array of coping strategies to achieve environmental compliance. This work is part of an ongoing project to develop a competitive technology database and technology competition model, both of which document existing technologies and their corresponding emission discharges. The database also maps the technology applications by two-digit SIC code and the applicable environmental regulations that impact that industry segment. This paper outlines the overall results of the first phase of the project, highlighting compliance strategies and technology options of approximately 40 four-digit SIC codes across a total of 11 two-digit SIC codes. This work will be completed in early 1995, in preparation for a broadened scope to the entire industrial sector.

Kyricopoulos, P. F.; Faruqui, A.; Chisti, I.

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

380

Review of the Pantex Site Office's Compliance with DOE Order 425.1D, Verification of Readiness to Start Up or Restart Nuclear Facilities, June 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Pantex Site Office's Compliance with Pantex Site Office's Compliance with DOE Order 425.1D, Verification of Readiness to Start Up or Restart Nuclear Facilities June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1 1.0 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Assessment Methodologies and Approach ........................................................................................... 1

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fleet-wide cafe compliance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Review of the Pantex Site Office's Compliance with DOE Order 425.1D, Verification of Readiness to Start Up or Restart Nuclear Facilities, June 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Pantex Site Office's Compliance with Pantex Site Office's Compliance with DOE Order 425.1D, Verification of Readiness to Start Up or Restart Nuclear Facilities June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1 1.0 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Assessment Methodologies and Approach ........................................................................................... 1

382

An analysis of SO{sub 2} emission compliance under the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments  

SciTech Connect

The effectiveness of SO{sub 2} emission allowance trading under Title 4 of the 1990 Amendments to the Clean Air Act (CAA) is of great interest due to the innovative nature of this market incentive approach. However, it may be a mistake to frame the compliance problem for a utility as a decision to trade or not. Trading of allowances should be the consequence, not the decision. The two meaningful decision variables for a utility are the control approaches chosen for its units and the amount of allowances to hold in its portfolio of assets for the future. The number allowances to be bought or sold (i.e. traded) is determined by the emission reduction and banking decisions. Our preferred approach is to think of the problem in terms of ABC`s of the 1990 CAA Amendments: abatement strategy, banking, and cost competitiveness. The implications of the general principles presented in this paper on least cost emission reductions and emissions banking to hedge against risk are being simulated with version 2 of the ARGUS model representing the electric utility sector and regional coal supplies and transportation rates. A rational expectations forecast for allowances prices is being computed. The computed allowance price path has the property that demand for allowances by electric utilities for current use or for banking must equal the supply of allowances issued by the federal government or provided as forward market contracts in private market transactions involving non-utility speculators. From this rational expectations equilibrium forecast, uncertainties are being explored using sensitivity tests. Some of the key issues are the amount of scrubbing and when it is economical to install it, the amount of coal switching and how much low sulfur coal premiums will be bid up; and the amount of emission trading within utilities and among different utilities.

Hanson, D.A.; Cilek, C.M.; Pandola, G.; Taxon, T.

1992-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

383

An analysis of SO sub 2 emission compliance under the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments  

SciTech Connect

The effectiveness of SO{sub 2} emission allowance trading under Title 4 of the 1990 Amendments to the Clean Air Act (CAA) is of great interest due to the innovative nature of this market incentive approach. However, it may be a mistake to frame the compliance problem for a utility as a decision to trade or not. Trading of allowances should be the consequence, not the decision. The two meaningful decision variables for a utility are the control approaches chosen for its units and the amount of allowances to hold in its portfolio of assets for the future. The number allowances to be bought or sold (i.e. traded) is determined by the emission reduction and banking decisions. Our preferred approach is to think of the problem in terms of ABC's of the 1990 CAA Amendments: abatement strategy, banking, and cost competitiveness. The implications of the general principles presented in this paper on least cost emission reductions and emissions banking to hedge against risk are being simulated with version 2 of the ARGUS model representing the electric utility sector and regional coal supplies and transportation rates. A rational expectations forecast for allowances prices is being computed. The computed allowance price path has the property that demand for allowances by electric utilities for current use or for banking must equal the supply of allowances issued by the federal government or provided as forward market contracts in private market transactions involving non-utility speculators. From this rational expectations equilibrium forecast, uncertainties are being explored using sensitivity tests. Some of the key issues are the amount of scrubbing and when it is economical to install it, the amount of coal switching and how much low sulfur coal premiums will be bid up; and the amount of emission trading within utilities and among different utilities.

Hanson, D.A.; Cilek, C.M.; Pandola, G.; Taxon, T.

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

384

EnergyPlus Analysis Capabilities for Use in California Building Energy Efficiency Standards Development and Compliance Calculations  

SciTech Connect

California has been using DOE-2 as the main building energy analysis tool in the development of building energy efficiency standards (Title 24) and the code compliance calculations. However, DOE-2.1E is a mature program that is no longer supported by LBNL on contract to the USDOE, or by any other public or private entity. With no more significant updates in the modeling capabilities of DOE-2.1E during recent years, DOE-2.1E lacks the ability to model, with the necessary accuracy, a number of building technologies that have the potential to reduce significantly the energy consumption of buildings in California. DOE-2's legacy software code makes it difficult and time consuming to add new or enhance existing modeling features in DOE-2. Therefore the USDOE proposed to develop a new tool, EnergyPlus, which is intended to replace DOE-2 as the next generation building simulation tool. EnergyPlus inherited most of the useful features from DOE-2 and BLAST, and more significantly added new modeling capabilities far beyond DOE-2, BLAST, and other simulations tools currently available. With California's net zero energy goals for new residential buildings in 2020 and for new commercial buildings in 2030, California needs to evaluate and promote currently available best practice and emerging technologies to significantly reduce energy use of buildings for space cooling and heating, ventilating, refrigerating, lighting, and water heating. The California Energy Commission (CEC) needs to adopt a new building energy simulation program for developing and maintaining future versions of Title 24. Therefore, EnergyPlus became a good candidate to CEC for its use in developing and complying with future Title 24 upgrades. In 2004, the Pacific Gas and Electric Company contracted with ArchitecturalEnergy Corporation (AEC), Taylor Engineering, and GARD Analytics to evaluate EnergyPlus in its ability to model those energy efficiency measures specified in both the residential and nonresidential Alternative Calculation Method (ACM) of the Title-24 Standards. The AEC team identified gaps between EnergyPlus modeling capabilities and the requirements of Title 24 and ACMs. AEC's evaluation was based on the 2005 version of Title 24 and ACMs and the version 1.2.1 of EnergyPlus released on October 1, 2004. AEC's evaluation is useful for understanding the functionality and technical merits of EnergyPlus for implementing the performance-based compliance methods described in the ACMs. However, it did not study the performance of EnergyPlus in actually making building energy simulations for both the standard and proposed building designs, as is required for any software program to be certified by the CEC for use in doing Title-24 compliance calculations. In 2005, CEC funded LBNL to evaluate the use of EnergyPlus for compliance calculations by comparing the ACM accuracy test runs between DOE-2.1E and EnergyPlus. LBNL team identified key technical issues that must be addressed before EnergyPlus can be considered by the CEC for use in developing future Nonresidential Title-24 Standards or as an ACM tool. With Title 24 being updated to the 2008 version (which adds new requirements to the standards and ACMs), and EnergyPlus having been through several update cycles from version 1.2.1 to 2.1, it becomes crucial to review and update the previously identified gaps of EnergyPlus for use in Title 24, and more importantly to close the gaps which would help pave the way for EnergyPlus to be adopted as a Title 24 compliance ACM. With this as the key driving force, CEC funded LBNL in 2008 through this PIER (Public Interest Energy Research) project with the overall technical goal to expand development of EnergyPlus to provide for its use in Title-24 standard compliance and by CEC staff.

Hong, Tianzhen; Buhl, Fred; Haves, Philip

2008-03-28T23:59:59.000Z

385

Examination of utility Phase 1 compliance choices and state reactions to Title IV of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990  

SciTech Connect

Title IV (acid rain) of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 is imposing new limitations on the emission of sulfur dioxide (SO{sub 2}) and nitrogen oxides (N{sub x}) from electric power plants. The act requires utilities to develop compliance plans to reduce these emissions, and indications are that these plans will dramatically alter traditional operating procedures. A key provision of the SO{sub 2} control program deaned in Title IV is the creation of a system of emission allowances, with utilities having the option of complying by adjusting system emissions and allowance holdings. A compilation of SO{sub 2} compliance activities by the 110 utility plants affected by Phase I is summarized in this report. These compliance plans are presented in a tabular form, correlated with age, capacity, and power pool data. A large number of the Phase I units (46%) have chosen to blend or switch to lower sulfur coals. This choice primarily is in response to (1) prices of low-sulfur coal and (2) the need to maintain SO{sub 2} control flexibility because of uncertain future environmental regulations (e.g., air toxics, carbon dioxide) and compliance prices. The report also discusses the responses of state legislatures and public utility commissions to the compliance requirements in Title IV. Most states have taken negligible action regarding the regulatory treatment of allowances and compliance activities. To protect mine employment, states producing high-sulfur coal have enacted regulations encouraging continued use of that coal, but for the most part, this response has had little effect on utility compliance choices.

Bailey, K.A.; Elliott, T.J.; Carlson, L.J.; South, D.W.

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

386

Compliance With Floodplain and Wetland Environmental Review Requirements (10 CFR Parts 1021 and 1022) - FR Notice, August 27, 2003  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

51429 51429 Vol. 68, No. 166 Wednesday, August 27, 2003 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Parts 1021 and 1022 RIN 1901-AA94 Compliance With Floodplain and Wetland Environmental Review Requirements AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) is revising its floodplain and wetland environmental review requirements to add flexibility and remove unnecessary procedural burdens by simplifying DOE public notification procedures for proposed floodplain and wetland actions, exempting additional actions from the floodplain and wetland assessment provisions of these regulations, providing for immediate action in an emergency, expanding the existing list of sources that may be used in determining the location of floodplains and wetlands, and allowing

387

Directory of Certificates of Compliance for radioactive materials packages: Report of NRC approved packages. Volume 1, Revision 18  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this directory is to make available a convenient source of information on packagings which have been approved by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. To assist in identifying packaging, an index by Model Number and corresponding Certificate of Compliance Number is included at the front of Volumes 1 and 2. An alphabetical listing by user name is included in the back of Volume 3 of approved QA programs. The reports include a listing of all users of each package design and approved QA programs prior to the publication date.

NONE

1995-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

388

Preliminary Waste Form Compliance Plan for the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory High-Level Waste  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy (DOE) has specific technical and documentation requirements for high-level waste (HLW) that is to be placed in a federal repository. This document describes in general terms the strategy to be used at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) to demonstrate that vitrified HLW, if produced at the INEEL, meets these requirements. Waste form, canister, quality assurance, and documentation specifications are discussed. Compliance strategy is given, followed by an overview of how this strategy would be implemented for each specification.

B. A. Staples; T. P. O' Holleran

1999-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

389

Research and Education Campus Facilities Radioactive Waste Management Basis and DOE Manual 435.1-1 Compliance Tables  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

U.S. Department of Energy Order 435.1, 'Radioactive Waste Management,' along with its associated manual and guidance, requires development and maintenance of a radioactive waste management basis for each radioactive waste management facility, operation, and activity. This document presents a radioactive waste management basis for Idaho National Laboratory Research and Education Campus facilities that manage radioactive waste. The radioactive waste management basis for a facility comprises existing laboratory-wide and facility-specific documents. Department of Energy Manual 435.1-1, 'Radioactive Waste Management Manual,' facility compliance tables also are presented for the facilities. The tables serve as a tool to develop the radioactive waste management basis.

L. Harvego; Brion Bennett

2011-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

390

Materials and Security Consolidation Complex Facilities Radioactive Waste Management Basis and DOE Manual 435.1-1 Compliance Tables  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Department of Energy Order 435.1, 'Radioactive Waste Management,' along with its associated manual and guidance, requires development and maintenance of a radioactive waste management basis for each radioactive waste management facility, operation, and activity. This document presents a radioactive waste management basis for Idaho National Laboratory's Materials and Security Consolidation Center facilities that manage radioactive waste. The radioactive waste management basis for a facility comprises existing laboratory-wide and facility-specific documents. Department of Energy Manual 435.1-1, 'Radioactive Waste Management Manual,' facility compliance tables also are presented for the facilities. The tables serve as a tool for developing the radioactive waste management basis.

Not Listed

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

391

Materials and Fuels Complex Facilities Radioactive Waste Management Basis and DOE Manual 435.1-1 Compliance Tables  

SciTech Connect

Department of Energy Order 435.1, 'Radioactive Waste Management,' along with its associated manual and guidance, requires development and maintenance of a radioactive waste management basis for each radioactive waste management facility, operation, and activity. This document presents a radioactive waste management basis for Idaho National Laboratory's Materials and Fuels Complex facilities that manage radioactive waste. The radioactive waste management basis for a facility comprises existing laboratory-wide and facility-specific documents. Department of Energy Manual 435.1-1, 'Radioactive Waste Management Manual,' facility compliance tables also are presented for the facilities. The tables serve as a tool for developing the radioactive waste management basis.

Lisa Harvego; Brion Bennett

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

392

Central Facilities Area Facilities Radioactive Waste Management Basis and DOE Manual 435.1-1 Compliance Tables  

SciTech Connect

Department of Energy Order 435.1, 'Radioactive Waste Management,' along with its associated manual and guidance, requires development and maintenance of a radioactive waste management basis for each radioactive waste management facility, operation, and activity. This document presents a radioactive waste management basis for Idaho National Laboratory's Central Facilities Area facilities that manage radioactive waste. The radioactive waste management basis for a facility comprises existing laboratory-wide and facilityspecific documents. Department of Energy Manual 435.1-1, 'Radioactive Waste Management Manual,' facility compliance tables also are presented for the facilities. The tables serve as a tool for developing the radioactive waste management basis.

Lisa Harvego; Brion Bennett

2011-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

393

Basis to demonstrate compliance with the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the Stand-off Experiments Range  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this report is to provide the basis and the documentation to demonstrate general compliance with the National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS) 40 CFR 61 Subpart H, National Emission Standards for Emissions of Radionuclides Other Than Radon from Department of Energy Facilities, (the Standard) for outdoor linear accelerator operations at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Stand-off Experiments Range (SOX). The intent of this report is to inform and gain acceptance of this methodology from the governmental bodies regulating the INL.

Michael Sandvig

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

394

Vehicle Technologies Office: Fact #208: March 18, 2002 CAFE Standards...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

could further reduce U.S. petroleum dependence and provide additional flexibility to vehicle manufacturers. Source: Committee on the Effectiveness and Impact of Corporate...

395

DOE/EA-1312: Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Grand Junction UMTRA Project Site (Climax Uranium Millsite) (September 1999)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Rev. 0 Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Grand Junction UMTRA Project Site (Climax Uranium Millsite) Final September 1999 Prepared by U.S. Department of Energy Grand Junction Office Grand Junction, Colorado Work Performed Under DOE Contract No. DE-AC13-96GJ87335 for the U.S. Department of Energy EA of Ground Water Compliance at the Grand Junction UMTRA Project Site DOE Grand Junction Office Page ii Final September 1999 Contents Executive Summary.........................................................................................................................v 1.0 Introduction...............................................................................................................................1 1.1 Grand Junction UMTRA Project Site Location and Description.........................................1

396

DOE/EA-1313: Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Monument Valley, Arizona, Uranium Mill Tailings Site (03/22/05)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE/EA-1313 DOE/EA-1313 Rev. 0 Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Monument Valley, Arizona, Uranium Mill Tailings Site Final March 2005 Prepared by U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management Grand Junction, Colorado Work Performed Under DOE Contract No. DE-AC01-02GJ79491 for the U.S. Department of Energy Document Number U0069700 This Page Intentionally Blank DOE Office of Legacy Management EA of Ground Water Compliance at the Monument Valley Site March 2005 Final Page iii Contents Page Acronyms and Abbreviations ....................................................................................................... vii Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................

397

Portsmouth DUF6 Conversion Final EIS - Chapter 6: Environmental and Occupational Safety and Health Permits and Compliance Requirements  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Portsmouth DUF Portsmouth DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS 6 ENVIRONMENTAL AND OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH PERMITS AND COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS 6.1 DUF 6 CYLINDER MANAGEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A DUF 6 CONVERSION FACILITY DUF 6 cylinder management as well as construction and operation of the proposed DUF 6 conversion facility would be subject to many federal, state, and local requirements. In accordance with such legal requirements, a variety of permits, licenses, and other consents must be obtained. Table 6.1 at the end of this chapter lists those that may be needed. The status of each is indicated on the basis of currently available information. However, because the DUF 6 project is still at an early stage, the information in Table 6.1 should not be considered comprehensive or

398

Compliance of SLAC_s Laser Safety Program with OSHA Requirements for the Control of Hazardous Energy  

SciTech Connect

SLAC's COHE program requires compliance with OSHA Regulation 29CFR1910.147, 'The control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout)'. This regulation specifies lockout/tagout requirements during service and maintenance of equipment in which the unexpected energization or start up of the equipment, or release of stored energy, could cause injury to workers. Class 3B and Class 4 laser radiation must be considered as hazardous energy (as well as electrical energy in associated equipment, and other non-beam energy hazards) in laser facilities, and therefore requires careful COHE consideration. This paper describes how COHE is achieved at SLAC to protect workers against unexpected Class 3B or Class 4 laser radiation, independent of whether the mode of operation is normal, service, or maintenance.

Woods, Michael; /SLAC

2009-01-15T23:59:59.000Z

399

Draft Title 40 CFR 191 compliance certification application for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Volume 2: Appendices, AAC, BECR, BH  

SciTech Connect

This report describes the conceptual design of a system the Department of Energy (DOE) may implement for compliance with the requirement to control access to the disposal site. In addition, this report addresses the scheduling process for control of inspection, maintenance, and periodic reporting related to Long Term Monitoring which addresses the monitoring of disposal system performance, environmental monitoring in accordance with the Consultation and Cooperation Agreement between the DOE and the state of New Mexico, and evaluation of testing activities related to the Permanent Marker System design. In addition to access control addressed by this report, the controlling or cleaning up of releases from the site is addressed in the Conceptual Decontamination and Decommissioning Plan. The monitoring of parameters related to disposal system performance is addressed in the Long Term Monitoring Design Concept Description. Together, these three documents address the full range of active institutional controls planned after disposal of the TRU waste in the WIPP repository.

NONE

1995-03-31T23:59:59.000Z

400

Materials and Fuels Complex Facilities Radioactive Waste Management Basis and DOE Manual 435.1-1 Compliance Tables  

SciTech Connect

Department of Energy Order 435.1, 'Radioactive Waste Management,' along with its associated manual and guidance, requires development and maintenance of a radioactive waste management basis for each radioactive waste management facility, operation, and activity. This document presents a radioactive waste management basis for Idaho National Laboratory's Materials and Fuels Complex facilities that manage radioactive waste. The radioactive waste management basis for a facility comprises existing laboratory-wide and facility-specific documents. Department of Energy Manual 435.1-1, 'Radioactive Waste Management Manual,' facility compliance tables also are presented for the facilities. The tables serve as a tool for developing the radioactive waste management basis.

Lisa Harvego; Brion Bennett

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fleet-wide cafe compliance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Compliance Monitoring of Underwater Blasting for Rock Removal at Warrior Point, Columbia River Channel Improvement Project, 2009/2010  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Portland District (USACE) conducted the 20-year Columbia River Channel Improvement Project (CRCIP) to deepen the navigation channel between Portland, Oregon, and the Pacific Ocean to allow transit of fully loaded Panamax ships (100 ft wide, 600 to 700 ft long, and draft 45 to 50 ft). In the vicinity of Warrior Point, between river miles (RM) 87 and 88 near St. Helens, Oregon, the USACE conducted underwater blasting and dredging to remove 300,000 yd3 of a basalt rock formation to reach a depth of 44 ft in the Columbia River navigation channel. The purpose of this report is to document methods and results of the compliance monitoring study for the blasting project at Warrior Point in the Columbia River.

Carlson, Thomas J.; Johnson, Gary E.; Woodley, Christa M.; Skalski, J. R.; Seaburg, Adam

2011-05-10T23:59:59.000Z

402

Advanced Test Reactor Complex Facilities Radioactive Waste Management Basis and DOE Manual 435.1-1 Compliance Tables  

SciTech Connect

U.S. Department of Energy Order 435.1, 'Radioactive Waste Management,' along with its associated manual and guidance, requires development and maintenance of a radioactive waste management basis for each radioactive waste management facility, operation, and activity. This document presents a radioactive waste management basis for Idaho National Laboratory's Advanced Test Reactor Complex facilities that manage radioactive waste. The radioactive waste management basis for a facility comprises existing laboratory-wide and facility-specific documents. U.S. Department of Energy Manual 435.1-1, 'Radioactive Waste Management Manual,' facility compliance tables also are presented for the facilities. The tables serve as a tool to develop the radioactive waste management basis.

Lisa Harvego; Brion Bennett

2011-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

403

Biodiesel Drives Florida Power & Light's EPAct Alternative Compliance Strategy; EPAct Alternative Fuel Transportation Program: Success Story (Fact Sheet)  

SciTech Connect

This success story highlights how Florida Power & Light Company has successfully complied with the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct) through Alternative Compliance using biodiesel technologies and how it has become a biofuel leader, reducing petroleum use and pollutant emissions throughout Florida.

2010-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

404

Standard Compliance: Guidelines to Help State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets Meet Their Energy Policy Act Requirements, 10 CFR Part 490 (Book)  

SciTech Connect

This guidebook addresses the primary requirements of the Alternative Fuel Transportation Program to help state and alternative fuel provider fleets comply with the Energy Policy Act via the Standard Compliance option. It also addresses the topics that covered fleets ask about most frequently.

Not Available

2012-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

405

INSTALLATION CERTIFICATE CF-6R-MECH-29-HERS Supply Duct Compliance Credits -Location; Surface Area; R-value (Page 1 of 2)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

requirements and the building must meet Quality Insulation Installation requirements. Yes No The duct. Yes No Ducts are located within the conditioned volume of building. Yes to this compliance credit performance insulation. In order to claim these credits a detailed duct system design is required

406

Energy Conservation Program: Certification, Compliance, and Enforcement for Consumer Products and Commercial and Industrial Equipment, Published March 7, 2011.  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

VerDate Mar2010 18:04 Mar 04, 2011 VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:04 Mar 04, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\07MRR2.SGM 07MRR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES2 Vol. 76 Monday, No. 44 March 7, 2011 Part II Department of Energy 10 CFR Parts 429, 430 and 431 Energy Conservation Program: Certification, Compliance, and Enforcement for Consumer Products and Commercial and Industrial Equipment; Final Rule VerDate Mar2010 18:04 Mar 04, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\07MRR2.SGM 07MRR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES2 12422 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 44 / Monday, March 7, 2011 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Parts 429, 430 and 431 [Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-CE-0014] RIN 1904-AC23 Energy Conservation Program:

407

Compliance Monitoring of Juvenile Yearling Chinook Salmon and Steelhead Survival and Passage at The Dalles Dam, Spring 2010  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this compliance study was to estimate dam passage survival of yearling Chinook salmon and steelhead smolts at The Dalles Dam during spring 2010. Under the 2008 Federal Columbia River Power System (FCRPS) Biological Opinion (BiOp), dam passage survival should be greater than or equal to 0.96 and estimated with a standard error (SE) less than or equal 0.015. The study also estimated smolt passage survival from the forebay boat-restricted zone (BRZ) to the tailrace BRZ at The Dalles Dam, as well as the forebay residence time, tailrace egress, and spill passage efficiency (SPE), as required in the Columbia Basin Fish Accords. A virtual/paired-release design was used to estimate dam passage survival at The Dalles Dam. The approach included releases of acoustic-tagged smolts above John Day Dam that contributed to the formation of a virtual release at the face of The Dalles Dam. A survival estimate from this release was adjusted by a paired release below The Dalles Dam. A total of 4,298 yearling Chinook salmon and 4,309 steelhead smolts were tagged and released in the investigation. The Juvenile Salmon Acoustic Telemetry System (JSATS) tag model number ATS-156dB, weighing 0.438 g in air, was used in this investigation. The dam passage survival results are summarized as follows: Yearling Chinook Salmon 0.9641 (SE = 0.0096) and Steelhead 0.9535 (SE = 0.0097).

Carlson, Thomas J.; Skalski, John R.

2010-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

408

Christina Snow, Compliance Office SUBJECT: Midway Sunset Cogeneration Company (85-AFC-3C) Staff Analysis of Proposed Modification  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

petition with the California Energy Commission requesting to modify the Midway Sunset Cogeneration Project. The 225-megawatt project was certified by the Energy Commission on May 14, 1987, and began commercial operation on May 1, 1989. The facility is located in Fellows in Kern County, California and uses cogeneration steam to aid in the enhanced oil recovery process. Air Quality technical staff reviewed the petition to amend and requested additional revisions for consistency with the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) Authority to Construct (ATC) permit. A modification of the petition to amend was submitted and posted online and docketed on November 19, 2010. The proposed amendment requests administrative modifications to Units A, B and C and revision of unit Bs DLN9 Combustion System to a DLN1+ Combustion System. Energy Commission staff reviewed the petition and assessed the impacts of this proposal on environmental quality, public health and safety, and proposes the modifications to the Air Quality Conditions of Certification as noted in the attached analysis. It is staffs opinion that, with the implementation of the revised air quality condition, the project will remain in compliance with applicable laws, ordinances, regulations, and standards and that the proposed modifications will not result in a significant adverse direct or cumulative impact to the environment (Title 20, California Code of Regulations, Section 1769). The amendment petition and staffs analysis have been posted on the Energy Commissions webpage at:

unknown authors

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

409

MISSION ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICER HANDBOOK and Guide to Life-of-Project Environmental Compliance for all USAID Staff  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Contract Number EPP-I-00-03-00013-00, Task Order No. 11. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of IRG and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. NOTE: The terminology used in this Handbook is consistent with the ADS. While terms such as, strategic objective and strategic objective team may no longer be in use, we use these terms herein pending update of ADS 204 and other USAID guidance. About this Handbook Dear MEO, The purpose of this Handbook is to provide you with guidance and the resources you need to be as effective as possible in helping your Mission attain and maintain full compliance with USAIDs Environmental Procedures and to mainstream environmentally sound design and management (ESDM). We know that your MEO role is just one of several important and competing responsibilities, and we hope that this Handbook makes your MEO role more fulfilling and easier. This Handbook provides you with: A basic orientation to USAIDs Environmental Procedures and the MEO position. Recommendations for coordinating with other USAID staff and partners. An orientation to, and recommendations for, implementing the MEOs core role: ensuring that

unknown authors

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

410

Ozone Modeling for Compliance Planning: A Synopsis of "The Use of Photochemical Air Quality Models for Evaluating Emission Control Strategies--A Synthesis Report"  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments require that many nonattainment areas use gridded, photochemical air quality models to develop compliance plans for meeting the ambient ozone standard. This report reviews the status of photochemical air models--the computer simulation programs that will be used to set emission control programs to meet ground level (tropospheric) ozone standards currently in use for regulatory planning. Regulatory application guidelines are discussed, as are the limitations and reliabili...

1993-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

411

US Department of Energy`s Federal Facility Compliance Act Chief Financial Officer`s Report to Congress for fiscal year 1993  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Federal Facility Compliance Act of 1992 (FFCAct) (Public Law 102-386) was enacted into law on October 6, 1992. In addition to amending the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the FFCAct requires the US Department of Energy (DOE) to prepare an annual report from the Chief Financial Officer to the Congress on compliance activities undertaken by the DOE with regard to mixed waste streams and provide an accounting of the fines and penalties imposed upon the DOE for violations involving mixed waste. This document has been prepared to report the necessary information. Mixed waste is defined by the FFCAct to include those wastes containing both hazardous waste as defined in the RCRA and source, special nuclear, or byproduct material subject to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. Section 2001 et seq.). Section 2 of this report briefly summarizes DOE Headquarters` activities conducted during Fiscal Year 1993 (FY 1993) to comply with the requirements of the FFCAct. Section 3 of this report provides an overview of the site-specific RCRA compliance activities, relating to mixed waste streams, conducted in FY 1993 for those sites that currently generated or store mixed waste that are subject to regulation under RCRA. Section 4 provides information on notifications of alleged RCRA violations involving mixed waste imposed upon the DOE during FY 1993 and an accounting of any fines and penalties associated with these violations. Appendix A provides site-specific summaries of RCRA compliance activities, relating to mixed waste streams, conducted in FY 1993 for those sites that currently generate or store mixed waste that are subject to regulation under RCRA.

Not Available

1993-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

412

USGS and Engineering and Environmental Division joint compliance monitoring report for Sacramento, CA Municipal Utility District's SMUDGEO No. 1 Geothermal project. Appendix D to final decision  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The laws, ordinances, standards, and conditions for designing, constructing, and operating the power plant and related facilities are referenced. In addition, actions, verifications, submittals, and approvals required by the USGS, BLM, and CEC are specified to assure that the facilities are designed, constructed, and operated in compliance with air and water quality, public health and safety, environmental and such other laws, ordinances, and standards specified. (MHR)

Not Available

1981-03-25T23:59:59.000Z

413

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Project Information Project Title: WhisperGen Relocation to 65-S-1 0 j.,.. I~ 6 T -9-?t. / I f I ii?J { Date: 3116/2010 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Everett Walker r - - Project Overview ~ E £ N c. 5 ,;;g: z II(_ 5/ Z?fo 9 )cl- I'J c. '5 :::JT Z""'O ( ID 1 1 1 tJ 'I)! Jo~ What are the environmental The Environmental Specialist and the Field Coordinator visited location and discussed the o owing activity. 1. The unit will be within 120' radius of65-S10 wellhead location. The WhisperGen unit gas supply and power impacts? line to 65-S-1 0 will be buried. A six foot by six foot concrete pad. moved from the test's previous location, will be placed on the ground as a base for the unit. 2. What is the legal location? 65-S-10

414

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

28 28 Project Information Project Title: New B-1-3 Pit and Box Construction Date: 51 2612011 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Maintenance Department Project Overview This is a project for the construction of a new pit and box at the B-1-3 facility. Topsoil will be removed from 1. Brief project description [include the specified area and placed in a pile off to the side of the construction area. The pile will be identified as anything that could impact the topsoil, using a sign. After the topsoil has been removed the new pit and box will be dug out. Cement environment] retaining walls and a floor will be poured for the box. The new pit will be lined with 12 mm thickness pit liner The area around the new pit and box will be fenced to prevent animals and people from entering the area.

415

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Log Deep Well Log Deep Well Date: 1/1212010 DOE Code: 6730.020.81019 Contractor Code: I 8067-756 Project Lead: Brian Black Project Overview This project will test prototype logg1 n_g tools 1 n a previously drilled deep well. The should not be any neglible 1. What are the environmental impacts? impacts to the environment. The tools will be lowered up and down a wellbore Via wireline cable and truck. 2. What is the legal location? This test will take place on the drilling rig at 45-3-X-21 3. What is the duration of the project? 4, What major equipment will be used The project will last for 3-4 days. if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? The drilling ng will be used as a overflead crane to lift the sheave pulley that the cable will run across. The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

416

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

~ ~ ' Project Information Project Title: Restoration of 51-63-SX-1 0 Date: 12/28/2009 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview 1. What are the environmental impacts? The Location of this project is 51-63-SX-1 0. The duration is going to be approx. 3-days. Before we do 2. What is the legal location? any digging and welding we will be flushing the flowline . We will be digging down approx. 5ft. cutting the wellhead off and welding a legal plate to it. We will then do the same with the flowline. Once this is done 3. What is the duration of the project? we will be tilling and seeding location with native grasses. The machinery to be used is as follows: 4. What major equipment will be used if backhoe, Blade, Welder, Ford tractor, Seeder.

417

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Project Information Project Title: Repair flowline at 83-AX-4 Date: 2-17-2010 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Bernard Winfrey Project Overview 1. What are the environmental Repair a flowline leak and test the line at 83-AX-4. Dug up pipeline, will backfill with clean fi ll dirt. Oil impacts? contaminated soil will be hauled to the east side landfarm and clean dirt will be brought in from section 20. 2. What is the legal location? 83-AX-4, N43 17'40.5" w. 10612'46.0" 3. What is the duration of the project? Approximately 2 days 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, Backhoe with operator and one to three workers. etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

418

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Project lnfonnation Project Title : NODA 1. Planned repair of flow lines Dat e : 8/41201 DOE Code : Contrac t o r Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Ov erview NODA 1. Planned repair of flow lines : CX 8 5.4 1. Bnef project description [include anything that could impact the Note : For all 85.4 : Repair of pipeline sections falls under USACE environmenl] Nationwide Permit Number 12, Utility Line Activity. Non-emergency repairs that do NOT include reportable releases I spills. NOD required to ensure activities remain within existing right-of-ways (25' from centerline] and to determine if further analysis may be needed. The table below is to be completed by the Project Lea d a nd review ed by the Environmental Specialist a nd the DOE NEPA

419

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

;l,[p~ ;l,[p~ Project Information Project Title: Restoration of 54-TPX-1 0 Date: DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview 1. What are the environmental We will be restoring 54-TPX-10. The work to be done will be to dig 5ft below surface cut casing and impacts? install a marker. We will do the same with the flowline. Any contaminated soil will be replaced with clean fill dirt. The contaminated soil will be transferrred to the lanclfarm. The base will be moved to section 14. 2. What is the legal location? We will then blade, till and reseed with native grasses. The equipment to be used will be as follows: 3. What is the duration of the project? Backhoe, Blade, Shovels, Torch, Welder, And Tiller. This project will also require a hotwork permit for the

420

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Project Information Project Title: T-6-10 abandoment and storage relocation Date: 912812009 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview We will be reclaiming this loc. we will dig down approx. 4ft. cut off pipes and cap them. And haul of dirt from the berms . We will then blade loc. . The worX to be done is to reclaim this location. In preparation for this 1. What are the environmental worX we will need to remove the old shipping building and a old set of tank stairs. These will be placed in storage in section 14. Upon reading SOP: EN.8000.01 reviewed on July 23rd 2009 I believe this falls under impacts? 2. What is the legal location? NEPA exclusion ex 81 .3 and CX 85.3. Which reads: When moving portable buildings to another disturbed

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fleet-wide cafe compliance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

:;J/7 :;J/7 Project Information Project Title: B-1-3 Heat Trace Date: 10/14/09 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Mike Preston Project Overview Routine maintenance activities for the buildings at B-1-3 using existing electrical rights-of-way, to repair and replace electrical lines from the electrical box to the existing buildings. This is a routine 1. What are the environmental Maintenance activities, to preserve the electrical function in the buildings at B-1-3. impacts? 2. What is the legal location? 1 Day 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used Ditch witch I Backhoe if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

422

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Restoration of 62-42 SX 10 DOE Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview We will be restoring this location 62-42 SX-1 0. What are the environmental Date: 2/25/2010 Contractor Code: impacts? We will be removing all oil contaminated soil from location to the landfarm and recording it in the book. W e 2. What is the legal location? will then back fill with clean fill dirt from sec.20. We will remove well head and place a dry hole marker. 3. What is the duration of the project? Flush flowline and remove it. Then we will till the location and plant with native grasses. 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig , 3-4 days etc.)? The equipment to be used will be a backhoe, tiller, dumptruck, and welder.

423

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Project Information Project Title: e-EA 1. Maintaining and Replacing Infrastructure Date: 6/6/2011 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Overview e-EA 1. Maintaining and Replacing Infrastructure: 1. Brief project description [include Approved in the October 2008 Sitewide Environmental Assessment (SWEA) anything that could impact the [Section 3.1.1, Page 11 , Line 3] and Finding of No Significant Impact environment] (FONSI ). ex 81.22 and ex 85.2 2. Legal location 3. Duration of the project To include moving I minor upgrading I installing buildings, storage tanks, 4. Major equipment to be used pumps, pumping units, etc. Contact Technical Assurance to include tank moves in the Spill Prevention Countermeasures and Control (SPCC) Plan.

424

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Project Information Project Title: Restoration "F T-3-3 Date: 1212/2009 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview 1. What are the environmental The environmental impacts will be minimal since this is already disturbed land. The legal is T-3-3. We will be impacts? digging down 5ft. and cutting off pipe and capping them. We will then blade the area and till it The 2. What is the legal location? equipment to used is as follows: backhoe, blade, cutting torch,and a tiller. The duration of this project will be approx. 2 days. 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Speciali.st and the DOE NEPA

425

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Project lnfonnat ion Project Title: Geothermal Technologies Program - ORMAT Generator Date: 10-22-09 DOE Code: 6730.020.61041 Contractor Code: 8067-731 Project Lead: Lyle Johnson Project Overview 1. What are the environmental This NEPA is for the existing ORMAT geothermal processing unit that was used for testing during CRADA impacts? No 2007-083. The Original project consisted of the installation and 1 year testing of the binary geothermal power unit at the Tensleep battery using the hot produced water source as the heat medium. The unit is 2. What is the legal location? connected to the field electrical system for dissipation of the produced energy that is metered and monitored 3. What is the duration of the project? for reliability and quality. It is planned for the unit to remain in place so that an additional approximately 2.5

426

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Project lnfonnation Project Title: C-EA 7. Cleanup of "non-reportable" spills of crude Date: 8/4/2011 oil &/or produced water DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Overview C-EA 7. Cleanup of "non-reportable" spills of crude oil &/or produced 1. Brief project description [include water : ex 85.4 and ex 85.6 anything that could impact the environment] Note : For all 85.4 : Repair of pipeline sections falls under USACE Nationwide Perm it Number 12, Utility Line Activity. For RMOTC's NEPA purposes, non-reportable spills of crude oil &/or produced water are less than one barrel that is NOT environmentally significant. Events that are environmentally significant include those that

427

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Project lnfonnation Project Title: C-EA 3. Dirt work in the specified areas that have been previously and substantially disturbed Date: 617/2011 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Overview 1 . Brief project description [include anything that could impact the environment] 2. Legallocation 3. Duration of the project 4. Major equipment to be used C-EA 3. Dirt work in the specified areas that have been previously and substantially disturbed: ex 81.3 Includes previously-bladed areas immediately within "only" the following facilities as defined by the May 2010 Aerial Photos: B-1-3 B-1-1 0 B-2-10 T-1-11 B-1-20 T-2-34 T-5-3 South Terminal Car Wash (SG2) SG4 ESS&H Bldg. Lower Production Office and Shop Bldg

428

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Project Informat ion Project Title: Date: 10-26-2009 DOE Code: Contractor Code : 8067.742 Project Lead: Mike Curtis Project Overview To stimulate the Shannon Reservoir using a down-hole seismic source set in well 68-68-Sx-11 . The source 1. What are the environmental will be powered by a self-contained. electric driven. surface, hydraulic unit Production data will be logged at the 8 surrounding wells. impacts? 2. What is the legal location? Environmental Impact - There will be no environmental impact on the surface or subsurface. 3. What is the duration of the project? Location- Tool will be installed in 68-68-Sx-1 1. Production will be logged at the 8 surrounding production wells 4. What major equipment will be used Duration - 3 months if any (wori< over rig. drilling rig.

429

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE (EC)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OPERATIONS (OP) OPERATIONS (OP) OBJECTIVE OP. 1: The formality and discipline of operations, considering operations and support personnel, are adequate to conduct work safely and programs are implemented to maintain this formality and discipline. (CRs 1, 7, 11, and 13) CRITERIA 1. WCRR has an NNSA-approved Conduct of Operations (COO) Matrix. (DOE O 5480.19) 2. There are adequate and correct programmatic procedures, processes, and other work control documents in place to implement the applicable elements of DOE O 5480.19 and the requirements of the WCRRF TSRs (DOE O 5480.19; DOE O 433.1, 10 CFR 830.120, WCRRF TSR 5.6.3) 3. Performance of conduct of operations is observed to be adequate (i.e., logkeeping, shift turnover, timely orders, equipment labeling, review of surveillance, operational formality and

430

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

67 67 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Restoration of 63-S-11 Date: 1212112009 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview The environmental impacts will be minimal since this is an already disturbed area. The loc. is 63-S-11 . The 1. What are the environmental impacts? duration of this project will be approx. 4 days. We will flush the flowline and cut it off below surface and cap it. We will also do the same with the wellhead and then weld a location marker on it. The final stage will be to Ull 2. What is the legal location? and seed with native foilage.The equipment to be used is as follows backhoe, Blade, Welder. tiller. and 3. What is the duration of the project? seeder. 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig,

431

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1" .J(p(p 1" .J(p(p Project lnfonnation Project Title: Geothermal Technologies Program Da te: 12/8/09 DOE Code: 6730.020.61041 Contractor Code: 8067-731 Project Lead: Lyle Johnson Project Overview This wor1< will consist of the laying of two pipelines to complete the construction of a low temperature 1. What are the environmental impacts? geothermal testing facility at the t>M/F building in Section 21 . The first line will.re a 250 feet long. 6 inch steel line from well17 WX 21 to the building. This line will provide hot Madison water to the facility. The 2. What is the legal location? second line will be a 250 feet long 1 0 inch steel line to return the cooling water and excess Madison to the 3. What is the duration of the project? Teapot Creek drainage. This line will terminate on a cement slab * a stone pile or a combination of botn to

432

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE (EC)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MANAGEMENT (MG) MANAGEMENT (MG) OBJECTIVE MG.1: Functions, assignments, responsibilities, and reporting relationships (including those between the line operating organization and Environment, Safety, and Health support organizations) are clearly defined, understood, and effectively implemented, with line management responsible for safety. Personnel exhibit an awareness of public and worker safety, health, and environmental protection requirements and, through their actions, demonstrate a high priority commitment to comply with these requirements. (CR 1 and 2) CRITERIA 1. The WCRR has effectively implemented the organization and management responsibilities specified in TSR 5.2. (WCRRF TSR 5.2; DOE P 450.4, 10 CFR 851) 2. Implementation of TSR 5.2 includes accurate organizational documentation that is

433

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE (EC)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

RADIATION PROTECTION (RP) RADIATION PROTECTION (RP) OBJECTIVE RP.1: LANL line management has established Radiation Protection programs to ensure safe accomplishment of WCRR operations and maintenance activities within the requirements of the safety basis documents and regulatory permits. Sufficient numbers of qualified personnel as well as adequate facilities and equipment are available to support WCRRF operations. (CRs 1, 4, 6, and 7) CRITERIA 1. The LANL Radiation Protection Program has been effectively implemented in support of the full scope of WCRR operations including Bioassays, ALARA, RWPs, survey requirements, decontamination, etc. (10 CFR 835, WCRRF TSR 5.6.6) 2. An adequate number of radiation protection program personnel including RCTs, radiation

434

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

-$ )_Jp ~ R -$ )_Jp ~ R tW" I Project lnfonnation Project Title: New Drilling Location in Section 29 Date: 12-10-2009 DOE Code: 6730.020.78002 Contractor Code: 8067-371 Project Lead: Mar1< Duletsky Project Overview The project will involve excavating ~ backhoe pits to a depth of about 8 feet to observe soil characteristics 1. What are the environmental impacts? in the vicinity of our planned reserve pit excavation area. 2. What is the legal location? NE 1/4, SE 1/4, Sec. 29, T39N, R78W, Natrona County, Wyoming 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used 1 day if any (worn over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? Backhoe The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the E. nvironmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

435

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Project Information Project Title: Restoration of 73 SX 1 OH DOE Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview We will be restoring this location 73 SX 10H. What are the environmental Date: 3/3/2010 Contractor Code: impacts? We will be removing all oil contaminated soil from location to the landfarm and recording it in the book. We 2. What is the legal location? will then back fill with clean fill dirt from sec.20. We will remove well head and place a dry hole marker. 3. What is the duration of the project? Flush flowline and remove it.Then we will till the location and plant with native grasses. 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig , drilling rig, 3-4 days etc.)? The equipment to be used will be a backhoe, tiller, dumptruck, and welder.

436

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

283 283 Project Information Project Title: Restoration of61 -36-SX-10 DOE Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Ove rview We will be restoring this location 61 -36-SX-10. What are the environmental Da te: 2-9-2010 Cont rac tor Code: impacts? We will be removing all oil contaminated soil from location to the landfarm and recording it in the book. We 2. What is the legal location? will then back fill with clean fill dirt from sec.20. We will remove well head and place a dry hole marl

437

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Project Informa t ion Proj ect Title: Restoration South of 54-TPX-1 0 Date : 2-8-1 0 DOE Code : Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Ove rview We will be digging contaminated soil out of the ground just to the south of 54-TPX-10. We will be taking all 1. What are the enwonmental 1 mpacts? contaminated soil to the land farm and entering the tot. ats in the log. We will backfill with clean fill dirt from Sec.20. 2. What is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? The dura~Jon should be no longer than 4-6 days T 4 What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, The equipment to be used is as follows Backhoe. dump truck. Tiller. etc.)? Aller all contaminated soil is removed and fresh fill has been placed we will t\11 the area and seed with native

438

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Glori Oil-Biotechnology EOR Date: 2-4-10 DOE Code: 6730-020-51132 Contrac tor Code: 8067-757 Project Lead: Mark Duletsky Project Overview This is a proposal to place a water line from the water haul tank to 21-1 6-sx-2. The waterline will be buried 1. What are the environmental impacts? following an existing right of way to the road and then tum and be place in the roadway to the 21 16 sx-2 location. 2. What is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? There will be a minor amount of surface disturbance involed in the project during trenching operations for the 4. What major equipment will be used pipeline. The area will be reclaimed after the pipeline is completed. if any (work over rig, drilling rig,

439

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Project Information Project Title: Colvert replacement near 81-66-sx-15 Date: 10-19-09 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Bone -Wes Reisland Project Overview 1. What are the environmental We have a drainage problem with this colvert near 81-66-SX15 , and have tried to blast it out with a water impacts? from a fire hose to no avail. We think that it is colapsed in the middle. The environmental impact should be very small from digging the colvert out and replacing it. The job should take no longer than one day and will 2. What is the legal location? require two men a backhoe and picker truck to complete. The colvert will be replaced. Any contaminated 3. What is the duration of the project? soils will be replaced with fresh soil. The area for equipment will be restricted to the road and the imediant

440

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Binary Power Unit Test Binary Power Unit Test Date: 3-29-2010 DOE Code: 6730.020.61045 Contractor Code: 8067-768 Project Lead: Lyle Johnson Project Overview 1 What are the environmental The purpose of the project is to do confirmation testing of the binary power unit at several different impacts? temperatures and rates. This test will be conducted in a location covered in the Site Wide EA It will uses infrastructure installed for another project consisting of a hot-water source and a cooling water source. The 2. What is the legal location? hot water is from well 17 -WX-21 , a Madison well adjacent to the siting location. The cooling water will be 3. What is the duration of the project? pumped from Little Teapot Creek through an existing line and then returned to Teapot Creek. There should

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fleet-wide cafe compliance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

lnfonnat lnfonnat lon Project Title: Geothennal Technologies Program I Date : II0/20/09 DOE Code: 6730.020.61 041 I Contractor Code: lso67-73t Project Lead: Lyle Johnson TillS NEPA is for the laying of a 2.975 foot. 8" welded plastic wata ltnc from Lillie Teall<'!(~ Project Overview 1. 'Mlat are the environmental ncar in the Intersection with Teapot Creek to the North Waterllood Facility (NW F) building. The impacts? entire project area is within Section 21 T39N R 78W (map attached) and will not impact any wet 2. 'Mlat is the legal location? land areas but will cross one in tcnnittcnt stream. The stream is presently dry. The project will 3. 'Mlat is the duration of the project? include the clearing of vegetation from a 12 foot wide construction corridor along the route, digging

442

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Project Information Project T itle: Repair flowline 77 -S-1 0 Date: 3111/2010 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Wes Riesland Project Overview The flowline leak at 77 -s-1 0 surfaced on the location but we had to follow the line off the location to find the 1. What are the environmental impacts? hole in the pipe. This took us up the hill going south aproximatily 120 feet from the well head. We were able 2. What is the legal location? to successfully clamp the leak. 3. What is the duration of the projed? This flowline runs from the well 77 -s-1 0 to the B-2-1 0 manifold. 4. What major equipment will be used Approximately 6 hours to complete if any (worn over rig. drilling rig. etc.)? backhoe and opperator and one hand The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

443

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Project Information Project Title: Restoration ofT -6-3 Date: 11/10/2009 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Proje ct Le ad: Jeff Jones Project Overview The environmental impact will be minimal. The location is T -6-3. The duration of this project is approx. two 1. What are the environmental impacts? weeks. We will be removing the treater and building. Taking the building to 25X14. Taking the treater to the scrap yard to cut up for scrap.Aiso we will remove the manifold building and take that to 25X14 also. The 2. What is the legal location? piping that goes along with this will be flushed and capped.Then we will blade and level location till and 3. What is the duration of the project? seed with native species of plants and grasses. The equipment used in this project will be as follows:

444

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Project lnfonnation Project ntle: TerrVlci RSS Ill Dat e: 11-18-09 DOE Code: 6730.020.71088 Contractor Code: 8067-746 Project Lead : Frank Ingham Project Overview Nill. We reentering an existing well with the rig currently in place on an existing pad and an existing pit. We 1. What are the environmental impacts? will drill one or more directionally drilled laterals. The well will be plugged back when finished or left for a subsequent partner. 2. What is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? The well is the 45-3-X-21 , API#49-025-23507, 2315" FSL & 2323" FWLof Sec 21 , T39N, R7fNV 4. What major equipment will be used If any (work over rig, drilling rig, The test is scheduled to last for approx 4 days. etc.)?

445

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Water haul permit location Date: 2-4-10 DOE Code: 6730-02()-51132 Contractor Code: 8067-757 Project Lead: Mark Duletsky Project Overview 1. What are the environmental This is a proposal to move the Water Haul line from the current location to the opposite side of the road. This impacts? action is for environmental and safety considerations. During the rainy season the area adjacent to the loading area becomes extremely muddy. The vehicles using the loading are become loaded down and 2. What is the legal location? cause ruts into the bank of the little teapot creek and on the graded areas. Moving the loading station to a 3. What is the duration of the project? higher position will eliminate the concerns. A pump will be used to draw water from the creek to a 400 bbl

446

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Range Management Survey Date: Range Management Survey Date: 12/6/10 DOE Code: 6730.020.0000 Contractor 8067-788 Code: Project Lead: I Anthony Bowler Project Overview We will use a backhoe to get samples for our range management survey. At each site. one or 1. Brief project descnptlon [include anything that two holes will be excavated, and the samples will be taken from 0-1' and 1-2' deep. After could 1mpad the environment] excavating and the samples taken. the remaining soli Will be replaced and tamped back into 2. Legal location place. 3. Duratfon of tile project See attached NPR-3 Maps for preliminary locations : N~ area well 6-A-2\ NVV SW Section 21 . 4. Major equipment to be used f Township 39N, Range 78E) Middle area well 48-1 -Sh (SE SW 34 Township 39N, Range 4 WU-LSIT£5

447

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

D D Project lnfonnation Project Title: Emergency flowline repair 78-sx-34 & 68-66-sx-34 Date: 12-29-09 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: RickM. Project Overview We dug up the line where the oil was coming out of the ground and had to put 2 clamps on to seal the leak. 1. What are the environmental impacts? The contaminated dirt was hauled to the land farm and after the line was tested we backfilled the hole. this job took 5 hrs. to complete and required a backhoe and two hands. this leak was 100 yards south of well No. 2. What is the legal location? 68-66-sx-34. 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

448

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

rr rr ;J. 95 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Well Coring-Schlumberger Carbon Services Date: 3/18/10 DOE Code: 6730.020.81016 Contractor Code: 8067-708 Project Lead: Vicki Stamp Project Overview 1 What are the environmental Description: We will use a combination of commercial wellbore logging and coring impacts? tools to analyze two existing RMOTC wells. Overview: 1. Environmental impacts are 2. What is the legal location? minimal. This is routine downhole well work . 2. Wells 43-TPX-10 and 46-TPX-10 3. What is the duration of the project? have been selected . 3. Anticipate approximately 1 month for well preparation and 4. What major equipment will be used project execution. 4. Workover rig , boom truck , pressure truck , dozer/grader and if any (work over rig

449

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Project Information Project Title: 17 -AX-11 Restoration Date: DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jim Bell Project Overview The environmental impacts should be minimal . Using Best Management Practies for erosion prevention; 1. What are the environmental impacts? we will dig out all unused pipeing and electrical wire and get rid of the concrete pad on the location. this will require the use of a backhoe, blade ,dozer and farm tractor. Containeated siol will be trensferred to the 2. What is the legal location? landfarm and clean fill dirt will be used for replacement. We will restore the location back to the origanal 3. What is the duration of the project? contour and reseed it. This should take around 4 days to complete. 4. What major equipment will be used

450

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Restoration 72-12-SX-1 0 Date: 2/26/2010 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview We will be restoring 71-12-SX1 0. This will include digging 5ft down and cutting well head off and placing 1. What are the environmental impacts? OHM. We will haul contaminated soils to the Eastside landfarm and record in log book. We will replace all dirt hauled off with clean fill from sec.20. 2. What is the legal location? 71-12 SX10 3. What is the duration of the project? Approximately 3-4 days 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig , drilling rig , Backhoe with operator, welder, tiller and one worker. etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

451

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE (EC)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MAINTENANCE (MN) MAINTENANCE (MN) OBJECTIVE MN.1: LANL line management has established a Maintenance Program to ensure safe accomplishment of work within the requirements of the safety basis documents and regulatory permits necessary for WCRR Facility operations and activities. Sufficient numbers of qualified maintenance personnel as well as adequate facilities and equipment are available to support WCRRF operations (CRs 1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 12). CRITERIA 1. The WCRRF Maintenance Management Program is compliant with the WCRRF Technical Safety Requirements (WCRFF TSR 5.6.7, 10 CFR 830). 2. Surveillance tests and in-service inspections have been developed, performed, and are tracked for safety systems identified in the BIO and TSRs (WCRRF TSRs).

452

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Geothennal Technologies Program Date: 12-11-09 DOE Code: 6730.020.61041 Contractor Code: Project Lead: Lyle Johnson Project Overview This NEPA is for the laying of a 350 foot. 8" welded plastic water line from the lower cooling pond at the 1. What are the environmental Tensleep battery to a location between the 5,000 bbl tank and the top pond at the Tensleep battery. The impacts? entire project area is within Section 10 T39N R78VV (map attached) and will not impact any wet land areas. 2. What is the legal location? The project will include the clearing of sparse vegetation from a 12 foot wide construction corridor along the 3. What is the duration of the project? route, digging a 5 foot deep trench. welding and placing the plastic line and covering and compacting the

453

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE (EC)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

LOS ALAMOS SITE OFFICE (LASO) LOS ALAMOS SITE OFFICE (LASO) OBJECTIVE LASO.1: Los Alamos Site Office (LASO) programs that provide oversight for WCRR, such as, Project Management, Facility Representative (FR), Authorization Basis (AB), Safety System Oversight (SSO), Safety Subject Matter Experts (SME), Occurrence Reporting, Contractor Assessment (CA), Issues Management, and Quality Assurance (QA) are adequate. (CR 18) CRITERIA 1. Required LASO management, oversight, and assessment programs important to nuclear safety activities specific to WCRR operations such as facility readiness and authorization, program management, nuclear safety, fire protection, emergency management, radiological protection, occupational safety and industrial hygiene, quality assurance, occurrence

454

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Openhole Logging Well Date: 2-8-2010 DOE Code: 6730-020-51135 Contractor Code: TBD Project Lead: Brian Black Project Overview This project will use the drilling rig and associated equipment to drill a well to 5400 feet that will be 1. What are the environmental impacts? designated for Openhole logging. The environmental impads include possible spills on location of drilling fluids or downhole fluids, minor excavation may be necessary in a pre-existing lined pit, and some earthwork to prepare the location for the drilling rig. 2. What is the legal location? This project will take place on the 61-2-TpX-10 well location (189' FNL, 1895' FEL Section 15,TWP38N, RNG78W). 3. What is the duration of the projed? This project is expected have a duration of 4 weeks (2 weeks of moving the rig, and 2 weeks of drilling,

455

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE (EC)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION (T&Q) TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION (T&Q) OBJECTIVE TQ.1: The selection, training, and qualification programs for operations, operations management, technical, and operations support personnel have been established, documented, and implemented for the range of duties required to be performed to operate and support WCRRF activities. For the training and qualification program, sufficient numbers of qualified personnel as well as adequate facilities and equipment are available to support WCRRF operations. (CRs 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7) CRITERIA Note: Level of knowledge for Operators and Supervisors will be assessed in the Operations functional area. Level of Knowledge for support personnel will be assessed in the appropriate functional areas.

456

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Project lnfonnation Project Title: RMOTC process improvement Old pipe yard clean up. Date: 11-03-09 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Terry Sullivan Project Overview 1. What are the environmental We will dig out the pipe racks that are cemented into the ground, and haul them out. Then remove the impacts? weeds that have taken over the area. Then we will blade the location and have it ready if we ever decide to 2. What is the legal location? make farther improvements. I expect this to take aproximatly one week with two to three hands working on it. The impact to the envoronment should be minimal as this area has already been disturbed. The work will 3. What is the duration of the project? require the use of a backhoe and a blade as well as the cherry picker. This location is located just north of

457

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cementing Swivel Test Cementing Swivel Test Da te: 6-23-2010 DOE Code: 6730-020-71094 Contractor Code: 8067-779 Project Lead: Mark Duletsky Project Overview 1. Brief project description [include The test will check the longevity of BJ Services cementing head elements. The test will be conducted on an anything that could impact the existing location, using an existing well in a recirculating flowline. The test will consist of tying cementing environment) head into mud system, rotating and circulating mud until 100 hours have elapsed or element failure. Potential exists for drilling mud leak from flowline. 2. Legal location 3. Duration of the project 45-3-X-21 , NE Y. SW Y. Section 21 Township 39 North Range 78 West 4. Major equipment to be used 5days Drilling rig , forklift, winch truck, water truck

458

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE (EC)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FIRE PROTECTION (FP) FIRE PROTECTION (FP) OBJECTIVE FP.1: LANS line management has established and implemented a Fire Protection program to ensure safe operations and activities associated with WCRR within the requirements of the safety basis documents and regulatory permits. Sufficient numbers of qualified fire protection program personnel as well as adequate facilities and equipment are available to support WCRRF operations. (CRs 1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 12) CRITERIA 1. Fire Hazard Assessments (FHAs) for WCRR are current, implemented, and flow into the BIO and TSRs as required. (DOE O 420.1B) 2. The Fire Protection Program, in support of WCRR, is compliant with DOE 420.1B as well as TSR 5.6.5 (DOE 420.1B; TSR AC). 3. The Fire Protection Program Specific Administrative Controls specified in TSR 5.10.1 have

459

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE (EC)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ENGINEERING (ENG) ENGINEERING (ENG) OBJECTIVE ENG.1: LANS has established and implemented an adequate Configuration Management (CM) program to develop and maintain consistency among system requirements and performance criteria, documentation, and physical configuration to ensure continued operational readiness of the systems identified by the BIO, TSRs, and SER for the WCRR. (CRs 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10) CRITERIA 1. An adequate CM process incorporating all safety systems identified in the WCRR BIO, TSRs, and SER has been developed and implemented. (10 CFR 830.122; DOE O 420.1B, DOE O 433.1A, WCRRF TSR 5.6.8) 2. WCRR documentation includes a formal listing of those systems, structures, and components that are within the scope of the Configuration Management Program, and that list conforms to

460

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 'f>lf,M/9-~ ~of- Project lnfq,gnation Project Title: WhisperGenARelocation from 58-MX-10 ~o 65-S-10 ·~ I Date: 3/16/2010 DOE Code: -#Z'l?. Contractor Code: Project Lead: Everett Walker /41f-t#J ST _,J.tl Project Overview The Environmental Specialist and the Field Coordinator visited location and discussed the plan to remove 1. What are the environmental impacts? the WhisperGen unit, concrete pad, gas supply umbilical, and power conduit from the current location and move to higher visibility area with dry gas supply to supply power to 65-S-1 0. an existing well. There were 2 previous NEPAs # 211 on 5/27/09 and #240 on 10/01/09 2. What is the legal location? 58-MX-10 3. What is the duration of the project? Construction Two days/ Project Duration 6 months

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fleet-wide cafe compliance" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Project Information Project Title: C-EA 2. Work on existing well location (within 125' Date: 6/6/2011 from well bore) DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Overview C-EA 2. Work on existing well location (within 125' from well bore): 1. Brief project description [include P&A of wells was approved in the October 2008 Sitewide Environmental anything that could impact the Assessment (SWEA) [Section 3.1 .1 , Page 11 , Line 1 ]and Finding of No environment] 2. Legal location Significant Impact (FONSI). CX 85.12 3. Duration of the project Includes well workovers, P&A of wells, and associated dirt work, to include 4. Major equipment to be used repair of anchors I piping I flowlines and construction of temporary workover

462

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE (EC)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT (EM) EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT (EM) OBJECTIVE EM.1: LANS has established and implemented an Emergency Management program to ensure safe operations and activities at WCRRF, including an emergency operations drill and exercise program with associated program records. Sufficient numbers of qualified personnel, as well as adequate facilities and equipment, are available to support WCRRF operations. (CRs 1, 4, 6, 7, and 11) CRITERIA 1. LASO and LANS have assessed their emergency management needs in order to plan and implement a comprehensive emergency management program (CEMP) commensurate with the hazards at WCRR. (DOE O 151.1C) 2. LANS line management has established and implemented an emergency management program to ensure safe operations and activities associated with WCRRF.

463

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Project lnfonnation Project Title: WisperGen Sterling Generator Date: 09-30-09 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Joe Rochelle Project Overview The produong well for the test W ill be 58-S-1 0 located m the SWSE SectiOn 1 0-T38N-R78W The well 1. What are the environmental impacts? was dnl ed an 1994 to a depth ot2184'to test the 10brara and Steele shale The weU was plugged back and completed 1 n the Shannon format1on from 360' to 464'. The well has 7" cas.ng set at 530' The 2. What is the legal location? well1s produced w1th a Nat1 onal 25 pump1 ng unrt The pump1ng un1 t currently has a 3 horsepower 3. What is the duration of the project? motor The motor w111 be replaced w1 th a 1.5 horsepower; motor w1th the followmg mforma!lon 1160 4. What major equipment will be used

464

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Weir Box for Tensleep discharge Date: 1 1-12.{)9 DOE Code: Project Lead: Dan Smallwood Project Overview 1 What are the environmental impacts? 2 . What is the legal location? 3. What 1 s the duration of the projed? 4 . What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? Contractor Code: The primary functions of the bio-treatment facility consist of oil-water separation, cooling, blending, and biological treatment of produced waters. The original facility was designed to treat an average of 50,000 barrels of produced water per day. RMOTC will install at the Tensleep cooling ponds outflow an open channel flow meter suitable for fixed-site monitoring with sensors to measure levels. The flow meter shall contain conversions tor

465

Office of Compliance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This report is one in a series of volumes published by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to provide information of general interest regarding environmental issues associated with specific industrial sectors. The documents were developed under contract by Abt Associates (Cambridge, MA), Science Applications International Corporation (McLean, VA), and Booz-Allen

unknown authors

2000-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

466

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Any contaiminated soil will be hauled to the 3. What is the duration of the project? compost facilities. When the site has tested as dean, the hole will be backfilled with dean...

467

Advanced Compliance Solutions, Inc.  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... 6 - 1: Generic standards - Immunity for residential, commercial and ... 123, Issue 2 (February 2011) Spectrum Management and Telecommunications ...

2013-08-23T23:59:59.000Z

468

Supplemental Section 106 Compliance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and a flat-roofed ell at the right of the faade. A small deck has been added atop the flat roof. All visible windows have been replaced with vinyl windows. According to County...

469

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

as all we will do is remove the soil that is in the pile. We will also reseed the ground under the d1rt so that will grow out next 2. What is the legal location? spring....

470

Toy Compliance Requirements  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Agency (ANVISA), Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply (MAPA), the National Petroleum Agency, Natural Gas and Biofuels (ANP), the ...

2012-08-24T23:59:59.000Z

471

Advanced Compliance Solutions, Inc.  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... [12/62087] IEC 62087:2008 Methods of measurement for the power consumption of audio, video and related equipment. ...

2013-09-06T23:59:59.000Z

472

Furniture Compliance Requirements  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... (PCR). PCRs help meet the growing demand for science-based support to verify environmental product claims and eliminate green washing. ...

2013-08-09T23:59:59.000Z

473

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

t~Lf§ t~Lf§ Project lnfonnation Project Title: T-2-11 Skim box reclamation Date: 10-S-09 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Terry Sullivan Project Overview We will dig around the cement box and cap or remove any pipes that are in the ground in the area. All of the 1. What are the environmental impacts? area we will be disturbing has already been dug up before ,so the impact to the invironment will be kept to a minimum. We will remove the cemant containment that is aproximatly six foot on all sides and take it to the 2. What is the legal location? cement pile behind the shop, or crush it and use it as backfill on location, at the descretion of the 3. What is the duration of the project? environmental dept. And backfill the hole with soil from the land farm that has been tested by the

474