Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Reviewing Measurement and Verification Plans for Federal ESPC Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reviewing Measurement & Verification Plans Reviewing Measurement & Verification Plans for Federal ESPC Projects February 2007 Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy This document was developed for the U.S. Department of Energy's Federal Energy Management Program by Nexant, Inc., and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. This document is posted on FEMP's web site at www.eere.energy.gov/femp/financing/ . [Headers and footers only revised 12/08] Reviewing M&V Plans Contents REVIEWING MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION PLANS FOR FEDERAL ESPC PROJECTS ............................................................................................................ 1 STEP 1 - PREPARE CUSTOM REPORT AND CHECKLIST FROM TEMPLATE .......................... 1

2

Reviewing Post-Installation and Annual Reports for Federal ESPC Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reviewing Post-Installation and Annual Reports Reviewing Post-Installation and Annual Reports For Federal ESPC Projects February 2007 Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy This document was developed for the U.S. Department of Energy's Federal Energy Management Program by Nexant, Inc., and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. This document is posted on FEMP's Web site at www.eere.energy.gov/femp/financing/superespcs_mvresources.html. Contents Reviewing Post-Installation and Annual Reports for Federal ESPC Projects 1 Step 1 - Prepare Custom Report and Checklists from Template 1 Step 2 - Review Project Documentation 2 Step 3 - Complete Checklists 2 Step 4 - Finalize Report 3 Step 5 - Provide Written Review to Agency and DOE 3

3

Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Integrated Waste Treatment Unit Federal Operational Readiness Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Operational Readiness Review June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 4.0 Results ................................................................................................................................................... 2

4

Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructu...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects Electricity...

5

Federal Energy Management Program Year in Review 2008  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Year in Review 2008 Federal Energy Management Program Federal Energy Management Program Year in Review 2008 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Project Transaction Services 2 Applied...

6

Federal Project Directors in  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

appropriate front-end plan- appropriate front-end plan- ning process would help DOE to identify the mission need for the project and aid in iden- tification and evaluation of alternative approaches and assessment of the cost and risks of each. This should lead to a well-defined set of re- quirements and scope of work that form the basis for effec- tive design. Front-end plan- ning in the DOE project man- agement system includes plan- ning procedures from project conception through approval of the performance baseline (CD-2). The Office of Engineering and Construction Management has developed two guides to assist Federal Project Directors in measuring progress toward achieving technology and pro- ject definition maturity during front-end planning prior to CD -2. DOE G 413.3-4, Technol-

7

Federal Energy Management Program: Project Funding  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Project Funding Project Funding AFFECT FOA Webinar FEMP hosted a 60-minute informational webinar and question and answer session on the AFFECT FOA on November 12, 2013. Review the webinar slides and transcript. Federal energy projects require funding to generate results. Carefully matching available funding options with specific project needs can make the difference between a stalled, unfunded project and a successful project generating energy and cost savings. The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) supports Federal agencies identify, obtain, and implement project funding for energy projects through: Energy Savings Performance Contracts ESPC ENABLE Process Utility Energy Service Contracts On-Site Renewable Power Purchase Agreements Energy Incentive Programs. Federal agencies can choose the funding options that best fits for their project needs. For an overview of available funding options and strategies, read the FEMP Project Funding Quick Guide.

8

Federal Energy Management Program: Project Funding  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Project Funding Site Map Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Federal Energy Management Program: Project Funding to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy...

9

Federal Energy Management Program: Awarded ESPC Projects  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Awarded ESPC Projects to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Awarded ESPC Projects on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Awarded ESPC...

10

Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Coordination in Federal Agency Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Regarding Coordination in Federal Regarding Coordination in Federal Agency Review of Electric Transmission Facilities on Federal Land, October 23, 2009 Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Coordination in Federal Agency Review of Electric Transmission Facilities on Federal Land, October 23, 2009 On October 23, 2009, the Department of Energy and eight other Federal agencies entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to improve coordination among project applicants, federal agencies, states and tribes involved in the siting and permitting process for electric transmission facilities on Federal land. The MOU will improve uniformity, consistency, and transparency by describing each entity's role and responsibilities when project applicants wish to build electric transmission facilities.

11

Integrating State and Federal Environmental Reviews  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA and CEQA: Integrating State and Federal Environmental Reviews Draft for Public Review and Comment March 2013 2 Table of Contents: I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 II. Questions and Answers .................................................................................................................... 5 A. Stage 1: Preliminary Questions ................................................................................................. 5 1. How Does NEPA and CEQA Terminology Differ? .................................................... 5 a. "Action" (NEPA) versus "Project" (CEQA) ................................................ 5

12

Federal Energy Management Year in Review 2002  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT YEAR IN REVIEW 2002 United States Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Federal Energy...

13

Funding Federal Energy and Water Projects  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

L E A N C I T I E S FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Funding Federal Energy and Water Projects The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) helps...

14

Project Execution Plan Review Module (RM)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Project Execution Plan (PEP) Review Module (RM) is a tool that assists DOE federal project review teams in evaluating the adequacy of the PEP development and maintenance for projects of any...

15

Federal Energy Management Program Year in Review 2009  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

FEMP YEaR in REviEw 2009 Year in Review 2009 Federal Energy Management Program YEar in rEviEw 2009 Table of Contents Introduction 2 Project Transaction Services 3 Applied...

16

Federal Energy Management Year 2001 In Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT YEAR IN REVIEW 2001 United States Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Federal Energy Management Program YEAR IN REVIEW...

17

Funding Federal Energy and Water Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Funding Federal Energy and Water Projects The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) helps Federal agencies identify and obtain funding for energy efficiency, renewable energy, water conservation, and greenhouse gas (GHG) management projects. Federal agencies cannot rely on Congressional appropriations alone to fund the energy projects needed to meet Federal require- ments. Additional funding options are available, including: * Energy savings performance contracts (ESPCs) * Utility energy service contracts (UESCs) * Power purchase agreements (PPAs) * Energy incentive programs Carefully matching available funding options with specific

18

Federal Energy Management Program: Call for Projects  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

at Federal agency facilities. Key Details Direct funding will be provided for combined heat and power and renewable energy projects. The anticipated funding level per award is up...

19

Federal Energy Management Program: Project Funding  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Project Funding on AddThis.com... Energy Savings Performance Contracts ENABLE Utility Energy Service Contracts On-Site...

20

Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Coordination in Federal Agency Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Coordination in Federal Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Coordination in Federal Agency Review of Electric Transmission Facilities on Federal Land, October 23, 2009 Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Coordination in Federal Agency Review of Electric Transmission Facilities on Federal Land, October 23, 2009 On October 23, 2009, the Department of Energy and eight other Federal agencies entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to improve coordination among project applicants, federal agencies, states and tribes involved in the siting and permitting process for electric transmission facilities on Federal land. The MOU will improve uniformity, consistency, and transparency by describing each entity's role and responsibilities when project applicants wish to build electric transmission facilities.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Federal Energy Management Program: Project Facilitation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

support, and commitment to project goals Kickoff meeting support Interagency agreement Audit Review and Master Agreement Development The audit review and master agreement...

22

Microsoft PowerPoint - Vicksburg District Federal Power Projects...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Vicksburg District Federal Power Projects Vicksburg District Federal Power Projects Blakely Mountain Hydro DeGray Hydro DeGray Hydro Narrows Hydro Blakely Mountain Rewind Unit 1...

23

Microsoft PowerPoint - Vicksburg District Federal Power Projects...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Power Projects Vicksburg District Federal Power Projects Blakely Mountain Hydro DeGray Hydro DeGray Hydro Narrows Hydro Blakely Mountain Rewind Unit 1 ll Rotor...

24

Federal Agency Projects | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Agency Projects Federal Agency Projects Federal Agency Projects Technical experts from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) help federal agencies pursue aggressive and integrated solutions to energy independence. Examples include work with the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) to meet net-zero energy goals at military installations and reduce fossil fuel use in polar regions. U.S. Department of Defense DOE and DOD have teamed up to help military installations across the United States reduce their reliance on local energy grids by producing as much energy on-site as their buildings, facilities, and fleet vehicles consume. U.S. Marine Corps Air Station Miramar DOE and NREL are performing assessments at select DOD sites to evaluate the

25

GRR/Elements/3.1 - Is the project on Federally Managed Lands...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

of Sections 3.1 - Is the project on Federally Managed Lands Pursuant to the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970, the Bureau of Land Management leases federal lands and reviews permit...

26

Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Assistance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Renewable Energy Renewable Energy Project Assistance to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Assistance on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Assistance on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Assistance on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Assistance on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Assistance on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Assistance on AddThis.com... Energy-Efficient Products Technology Deployment Renewable Energy Federal Requirements Renewable Resources & Technologies Project Planning & Implementation

27

Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects The Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, in collaboration with the Member Agencies of the Steering Committee (Member Agencies) created under Executive Order 13604 of March 22, 2012, and pursuant to the June 7, 2013 Transmission Presidential Memorandum, is seeking public input on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process. The proposed IIP Process is intended to improve interagency and intergovernmental coordination focused on ensuring that project proponents develop and submit accurate and complete information early in the project planning process to facilitate efficient

28

Federal Project Director Toolbox | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Project Director Toolbox Federal Project Director Toolbox Federal Project Director Toolbox Although the majority of the documents listed on this page appear elsewhere on the PMCDP Web site, the FPD Tool Box page was specifically designed with all current and aspiring FPDs in mind in that it houses all of the PMCDP's major tools and job aids in one specific, easy-to-access location. Whether you are applying for a new level of certification, or determining which courses or activities will provide you with the most continuing education credits, the Toolbox is the place to go to locate the best information that will ensure your success in the PMCDP program. Below is a list of the most prominent PMCDP job aids to include a brief summary of their respective contents: Certification Equivalency Guideline (CEG): The CEG establishes the U.S.

29

Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Project  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Project Construction to someone by E-mail Project Construction to someone by E-mail Share Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Project Construction on Facebook Tweet about Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Project Construction on Twitter Bookmark Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Project Construction on Google Bookmark Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Project Construction on Delicious Rank Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Project Construction on Digg Find More places to share Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Project Construction on AddThis.com... Home Introduction Assessing Renewable Energy Options Planning, Programming, & Budgeting

30

Federal Energy Management Program Year in Review 2005  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM YEAR IN REVIEW 2005 PRESIDENTIAL AWARDS FOR LEADERSHIP IN FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT FEDERAL ENERGY AND WATER MANAGEMENT AWARDS SHOWCASE AWARDS...

31

Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Planning and  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Renewable Energy Renewable Energy Project Planning and Implementation to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Planning and Implementation on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Planning and Implementation on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Planning and Implementation on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Planning and Implementation on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Planning and Implementation on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Planning and Implementation on AddThis.com... Energy-Efficient Products

32

Federal Energy Management Program: Technical and Project Assistance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Technical and Technical and Project Assistance to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Technical and Project Assistance on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Technical and Project Assistance on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Technical and Project Assistance on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Technical and Project Assistance on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Technical and Project Assistance on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Technical and Project Assistance on AddThis.com... Project Assistance Call for Projects Training Outreach Technical and Project Assistance The Federal Energy Management Program's (FEMP) offers technical and project assistance to help Federal agencies successfully implement energy- and

33

Federal Energy Management Program: Diversifying Project Portfolios for  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Diversifying Diversifying Project Portfolios for Utility Energy Service Contracts to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Diversifying Project Portfolios for Utility Energy Service Contracts on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Diversifying Project Portfolios for Utility Energy Service Contracts on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Diversifying Project Portfolios for Utility Energy Service Contracts on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Diversifying Project Portfolios for Utility Energy Service Contracts on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Diversifying Project Portfolios for Utility Energy Service Contracts on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program:

34

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment This manual...

35

Funding Federal Energy and Water Projects (Fact Sheets)  

SciTech Connect

Overview of alternative financing mechanisms available to Federal agencies to fund renewable energy and energy efficiency projects.

2011-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

36

Alternative Financing for Federal Energy and Water Projects (Fact Sheet)  

SciTech Connect

Overview of alternative financing mechanisms avaiable to Federal agencies to fund renewable energy and energy efficiency projects.

2010-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

37

Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act Project Stories  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Project Stories to someone by E-mail Project Stories to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act Project Stories on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act Project Stories on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act Project Stories on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act Project Stories on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act Project Stories on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act Project Stories on AddThis.com... Energy Savings Performance Contracts ENABLE Utility Energy Service Contracts On-Site Renewable Power Purchase Agreements Energy Incentive Programs Recovery Act Technical Assistance Projects Project Stories Recovery Act Project Stories

38

MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

November/December 2004 November/December 2004 Report Period: November 1- December 31, 2004 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS The Program Directive for the wildlife survey is on schedule for completion by January 15. Comments from the Biological Technical Assistance group have been incorporated. MRAP A punchlist of mill site restoration items was prepared. DOE and the City of Monticello have agreed upon which entity will perform each item on the punchlist. MVP No significant activities to report. FF A Monthly Report November- December 2004 Page 2 of5 STATUS MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITIES AGREEMENT REPORT November/December 2004 Report Period: November 1- December 31, 2004 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath Operable Units I and II DOE and the City of Monticello (City) are exploring the possibility of transferring the former

39

MRAP MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

MRAP MRAP MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT May/June 2005 Report Period: May 1 -June 30, 2005 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS DOE constmction, as identified in the Millsite Restoration Plan, was substantially completed on June 3. Seeding of disturbed areas was completed on June 15. MSG DOE completed constmction of the permeable reactive treatment cell and initiated operations in June. The cell is an enhancement to the existing pe1meable reactive ban·ier and was designed to alleviate ground water mounding. MVP Approximately one cubic yard of contaminated material was identified in a City of Monticello excavation near the golf course. This material was transferred to the Temporary Storage Facility located at the DOE Monticello Office.

40

Federal Energy Management Program Year in Review 2007  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Year in Review 2007 YEAR IN REVIEW 2007 FEdERAl ENERgY MANAgEMENt PRogRAM 2007 Federal Energy Management Program Year in Review 2007 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Technical...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Federal Energy Management Program Year in Review 2006  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Year in Review 2006 Federal energy ManageMent PrograM year In reVIeW 2006 2006 Federal Energy Management Program Year in Review 2006 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Technical...

42

Federal Energy Management Program: Large-scale Renewable Energy Projects  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Large-scale Large-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Larger than 10 MWs) to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Large-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Larger than 10 MWs) on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Large-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Larger than 10 MWs) on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Large-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Larger than 10 MWs) on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Large-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Larger than 10 MWs) on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Large-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Larger than 10 MWs) on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Large-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Larger than 10 MWs) on

43

Federal Energy Management Program: FDA Construction Project Serves as a  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

FDA Construction FDA Construction Project Serves as a Super ESPC Model to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: FDA Construction Project Serves as a Super ESPC Model on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: FDA Construction Project Serves as a Super ESPC Model on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: FDA Construction Project Serves as a Super ESPC Model on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: FDA Construction Project Serves as a Super ESPC Model on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: FDA Construction Project Serves as a Super ESPC Model on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: FDA Construction Project Serves as a Super ESPC Model on AddThis.com... Energy Savings Performance Contracts

44

Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal - June 2012 Federal - June 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Federal - June 2012 June 2012 Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Integrated Waste Treatment Unit Federal Operational Readiness Review This report documents the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), independent review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project-Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (SBWTP-IWTU) DOE (Federal) Operational Readiness Review (D-ORR). The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations and was intended to assess the effectiveness of the CORR process as implemented for the SBWTP-IWTU. This review also provides additional data regarding

45

Federal Energy Management Program: Technical and Project Assistance  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Program Areas: FEMP core programs focused on helping Federal agencies evaluate and deploy energy management, savings, and generation projects. FEMP Technology Programs: FEMP core...

46

Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Planning...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Planning and Implementation Federal renewable energy projects can be large or small and managed by a third-party or the agency. Typically, large-scale projects-larger than 10...

47

Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Federal - June 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Federal - June 2012 June 2012 Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Integrated Waste Treatment Unit Federal Operational Readiness Review This report documents the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), independent review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project-Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (SBWTP-IWTU) DOE (Federal) Operational Readiness Review (D-ORR). The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations and was intended to assess the effectiveness of the CORR process as implemented for

48

BioGas Project Applications for Federal Agencies and Utilities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Alternate Energy Systems, Inc. Alternate Energy Systems, Inc. Natural Gas / Air Blenders for BioGas Installations BioGas Project Applications for Federal Agencies and Utilities Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting - October 20-21, 2010 Rapid City, SD 1 BioGas Project Applications for Federal Agencies and Utilities Wolfgang H. Driftmeier Alternate Energy Systems, Inc. 210 Prospect Park - Peachtree City, GA 30269 wdriftmeier@altenergy.com www.altenergy.com 770 - 487 - 8596 Alternate Energy Systems, Inc. Natural Gas / Air Blenders for BioGas Installations BioGas Project Applications for Federal Agencies and Utilities Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting - October 20-21, 2010 Rapid City, SD 2 BioGas Project Applications for Federal Agencies and Utilities Objective

49

Federal Methanol Fleet Project final report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Federal Methanol Fleet Project concluded with the termination of data collection from the three fleet sites in February 1991. The Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (LBL) completed five years of operation, Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) completed its fourth year in the project, and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) completed its third. Twenty of the thirty-nine vehicles in the fleet were powered by fuel methanol (typically M85, 85 % methanol, 15 % unleaded gasoline, although the LBL fleet used M88), and the remaining control vehicles were comparable gasoline vehicles. Over 2.2 million km (1.4 million miles) were accumulated on the fleet vehicles in routine government service. Data collected over the years have included vehicle mileage and fuel economy, engine oil analysis, emissions, vehicle maintenance, and driver acceptance. Fuel economies (on an energy basis) of the methanol and gasoline vehicles of the same type were comparable throughout the fleet testing. Engine oil analysis has revealed higher accumulation rates of iron and other metals in the oil of the methanol vehicles, although no significant engine damage has been attributed to the higher metal content. Vehicles of both fuel types have experienced degradation in their emission control systems, however, the methanol vehicles seem to have degraded their catalytic converters at a higher rate. The methanol vehicles have required more maintenance than their gasoline counterparts, in most cases, although the higher levels of maintenance cannot be attributed to ``fuel-related`` repairs. According to the daily driver logs and results from several surveys, drivers of the fleet vehicles at all three sites were generally satisfied with the methanol vehicles.

West, B.H.; McGill, R.N. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States); Hillis, S.L.; Hodgson, J.W. [Tennessee Univ., Knoxville, TN (United States)

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

50

Federal Methanol Fleet Project final report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Federal Methanol Fleet Project concluded with the termination of data collection from the three fleet sites in February 1991. The Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (LBL) completed five years of operation, Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) completed its fourth year in the project, and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) completed its third. Twenty of the thirty-nine vehicles in the fleet were powered by fuel methanol (typically M85, 85 % methanol, 15 % unleaded gasoline, although the LBL fleet used M88), and the remaining control vehicles were comparable gasoline vehicles. Over 2.2 million km (1.4 million miles) were accumulated on the fleet vehicles in routine government service. Data collected over the years have included vehicle mileage and fuel economy, engine oil analysis, emissions, vehicle maintenance, and driver acceptance. Fuel economies (on an energy basis) of the methanol and gasoline vehicles of the same type were comparable throughout the fleet testing. Engine oil analysis has revealed higher accumulation rates of iron and other metals in the oil of the methanol vehicles, although no significant engine damage has been attributed to the higher metal content. Vehicles of both fuel types have experienced degradation in their emission control systems, however, the methanol vehicles seem to have degraded their catalytic converters at a higher rate. The methanol vehicles have required more maintenance than their gasoline counterparts, in most cases, although the higher levels of maintenance cannot be attributed to fuel-related'' repairs. According to the daily driver logs and results from several surveys, drivers of the fleet vehicles at all three sites were generally satisfied with the methanol vehicles.

West, B.H.; McGill, R.N. (Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States)); Hillis, S.L.; Hodgson, J.W. (Tennessee Univ., Knoxville, TN (United States))

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

51

Federal Energy Management Program: ESPC ENABLE Project Assistance and  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Project Assistance and Training Project Assistance and Training ESPC ENABLE Training To learn how to use ESPC ENABLE, take the Streamlining ESPCs for Small Sites First Thursday Seminar on demand. The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) offers project assistance and training to help Federal agencies implement Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPC) ENABLE projects. Project Assistance Through FY2014, project assistance from FEMP is cost-free and may include project management as well as technical support from experienced project facilitators and procurement staff. General Services Administration (GSA) contracting staff are also available to answer questions regarding the GSA Federal Supply Schedule 84, SIN 246-53. To learn more about one-on-one project assistance for your ESPC ENABLE project, contact Evan Fuka at 202-406-4107.

52

Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects on Federal Lands  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Mason Emnett Mason Emnett Office of Energy Policy and Innovation Jonathan First Office of the General Counsel February 6, 2013 NOTE: Comments herein do not represent the views of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or its Commissioners Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects on Federal Lands 2 Purpose of this Presentation * Describe the types of transactions that fall under FERC jurisdiction * Describe pertinent federal laws and how they apply - What does it mean to be a "public utility" or "transmitting utility" under federal law? - How does ownership and usage of a generation facility impact regulatory considerations? - When are parties required to register with NERC? 3 FERC-Related Statutes * Federal Power Act

53

Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects on Federal Lands  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Mason Emnett Mason Emnett Office of Energy Policy and Innovation Jonathan First Office of the General Counsel February 6, 2013 NOTE: Comments herein do not represent the views of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or its Commissioners Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects on Federal Lands 2 Purpose of this Presentation * Describe the types of transactions that fall under FERC jurisdiction * Describe pertinent federal laws and how they apply - What does it mean to be a "public utility" or "transmitting utility" under federal law? - How does ownership and usage of a generation facility impact regulatory considerations? - When are parties required to register with NERC? 3 FERC-Related Statutes * Federal Power Act

54

Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group Manual  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This Revision 3 of the Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group (LFRG) Manual was prepared primarily to include review criteria for the review of transuranic (TRU) waste disposal...

55

Federal Energy Management Program: Technical and Project Assistance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Technical and Project Assistance Technical and Project Assistance The Federal Energy Management Program's (FEMP) offers technical and project assistance to help Federal agencies successfully implement energy- and water-efficiency projects. Call for Projects: Look up current FEMP project opportunities. Working with DOE National Laboratories: Learn about working with the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) national laboratories through FEMP technical services and work-for-others agreements. Sell Energy-Efficient Products: Read about resources available to vendors interested in doing business with the Federal Government. GSA Schedules: Look up more commercial products and services at volume discount pricing arranged by the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA). For more information about FEMP, see:

56

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment October 3, 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 - PURPOSE, POLICY, AND MANDATES 1. Purpose 2. Statutory...

57

DOE Selects Project for up to $7 Million of Federal Funding to...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Selects Project for up to 7 Million of Federal Funding to Modernize Hawaii's Energy Infrastructure DOE Selects Project for up to 7 Million of Federal Funding to Modernize...

58

Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Assistance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Assistance Assistance Call for Projects FEMP recently issued a notice of intent to release a Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) that will provide grants to develop renewable energy projects. Read the call for projects. See box below for information on project assistance for this upcoming FOA. Request to Receive Project Assistance from FEMP Federal agencies interested in receiving FEMP project assistance must complete the renewable energy project assistance request form and email it to Boyan Kovacic. Applications will be processed on a weekly basis. For technical assistance on the upcoming FEMP FOA "Assisting Federal Facilities with Energy Conservation Technologies" (AFFECT), agencies must submit a letter stating their need for assistance and their intent to apply for the FOA in addition to completing the renewable energy project assistance request form.

59

Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project Transportation - September 2000 Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project Transportation -...

60

Federal Energy Management Program: Call for Projects  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

FEMP issues calls for projects surrounding energy efficiency, renewable energy, and water conservation. On July 9, 2013, FEMP issued a notice of intent on the EERE Exchange...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Federal Assistance Program/Project Status Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

suggestions for reducing this burden, to Office of Information Resources Management, AD-241.2 - GTN, Paperwork Reduction Project (1910-0400), U.S. Department of Energy, 1000...

62

Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group Manual  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

LEVEL WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY FEDERAL REVIEW GROUP MANUAL REVISION 3 JUNE 2008 (This page intentionally left blank) Low-Level JVllsfe Disposal Fllcili~l' Federal Review Group il1allUlli Revision 3, June 200S Concurrence The Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group Manual, Revision 3, is approved for use as of the most recent date below. Date Chair, Low-Level Waste Disposal Federal Review Group Andrew WalJo, 1II Deputy Director, Otlice of Nuclear Safety, Quality Assurance, and Environment Department of Energy OHlce of Health, Safety, and Security e C. WilJiams Associate Administrator for Infrastructure and Environment National Nuclear Security Administration Low-Level 'Vaste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group J1aJll/ai

63

MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITIES AGREEMENT REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

FACILITIES AGREEMENT REPORT FACILITIES AGREEMENT REPORT Report Period: October 1- December 31, 2005 DOE Project Coordinator: Ray Plieness HIGHLIGHTS The Final Report-2005 Avian Wetland Surveys at the Monticello Mill Tailings Site and the Final Report-Monticello Mill Tailings Site Macroinvertebrate Sampling for 2005 were transmitted to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ) on December 13. These reports are required under the Monticello Mill Tailings Site Operable Unit III Post-Record of Decision Monitoring Plan, Section 6.0 Biomonitoring Plan, to determine whether selenium levels are present in environmental media at concentrations that could cause adverse effects on ecological receptors. MRAP The draft-flnal2005 Annual Inspection of the Monticello Mill Tailings (USDOE) and

64

MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

January/February 2005 January/February 2005 Report Period: January 1 -February 28, 2005 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ), and U.S. Department ofEnergy (DOE) agreed that the Monticello Administrative Manual and Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Operating Procedures will not be combined into a single manual. Instead, the Monticello LTSM Operating Procedures for Swface and Ground Water will be written to address Operable Unit III requirements. A draft of this manual will be delivered to EPA and UDEQ by April14, 2005, and a draft-final version will be completed by August 12, 2005. A Program Directive for conducting wildlife surveys at the Monticello wetland areas has been

65

MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

August/September 2005 August/September 2005 Report Period: July 1- September 30, 2005 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS The draft-final Monticello Long-Term Surveillance and Afaintenance Operating Procedures for Swface and Ground Water (Volume III) and draft-final Annual Data Summmy Report for Operable Unit Ill of the Monticello Mill Tailings Site, October 2004 through April 2005 were completed. MRAP The annual inspection of the Monticello Mill Tailings Site and the Monticello Vicinity Properties was conducted on September 14 and 15. Several high priority repair items (see page 3 of this report) were identified during the inspection and were repaired by September 30, 2005. MVP No significant activities to report. FFA Monthly Report July- September 2005

66

MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

September/October 2004 September/October 2004 Report Period: September 1- October 31, 2004 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS With the completion of all remedial action reports, installation of monitoring wells in accordance with the Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan, and an onsite inspection by EPA and UDEQ, EPA was able tci write and sign the Preliminmy Closeout Report for the Monticello Mill Tailings Site (MMTS), Operable Units I, II, and III. With EPA's signature on this document (September 29, 2004), the MMTS was designated as "construction complete." MRAP The annual inspection oftheMMTS was conducted September 15-17,2004. With the exception of property now owned by the City of Monticello, the site is in good condition. Restoration and maintenance issues continue to exist on City owned property. DOE continues

67

MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

August 2004 August 2004 Report Period: July 1- August 31, 2004 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS Two monitoring wells were installed, which completed the monitoring network for OU III. The following documents have been completed: * · Monticello Mill Tailings Site Operable Unit III Post-Record of Decision Monitoring Plan * Remedial Action/Remedial Design Workplan for the Monticello Mill Tailings Site Operable Unit III MRAP DOE is continuing discussions with the City of Monticello concerning adequate restoration of the former millsite. On July 27, the DOE Contracting Officer wrote a letter insisting that the City of Monticello explain its plans to remedy the failure of the restoration of the Monticello Millsite as required under a Cooperative Agreement between the City and DOE.

68

MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

May/June 2004 May/June 2004 Report Period: May 1- June 30, 2004 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS The Record of Decision for the Monticello Mill Tailings (USDOE) Site Operable Unit IlL Swface Water and Ground Water, Monticello, Utah, was signed by DOE, UDEQ, and EPA. The last signature was obtained on June 2, 2004, seven days before the scheduled completion date. Monitored Natnral Attenuation is the selected remedy. MRAP The water level in the Pond 4 Leak Detection System is monitored daily; the level is static and pumping is no longer necessary. MVP Approximately 40 cubic yards of bricks and mortar were removed by the owner from the Park Plaza Apartments (MS-00057) and placed near a city utility excavation. The bricks and mortar exceed the soil standard of 5 pCi/g Ra-226 above background and were

69

ORISE: Scientific Peer Review for State and Federal Agencies  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Peer Review The Oak Ridge Institute for Science Education (ORISE) supports federal agencies-such as the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), U.S. Department of Homeland Security...

70

Certified Federal Project Directors | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Certified Federal Project Directors Certified Federal Project Directors Project Assessment (OPA) OPA Home About Project Management SC Projects Other Links SC Federal Project Directors (FPD) and FPD Resources Certified Federal Project Directors FPD Leadership Skills .pdf file (29KB) SC FPD 360° Mentoring Contact Information Project Assessment U.S. Department of Energy SC-28/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4840 F: (301) 903-8520 E: sc.opa@science.doe.gov SC Federal Project Directors (FPD) and FPD Resources Certified Federal Project Directors Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Site Federal Project Director Level Certified Project Contact Information Ames Site Office (AMSO) Cynthia Baebler 1 630-252-1563 cynthia.baebler@ch.doe.gov Argonne Site Office (ASO) Dale Dietzel 1 630-252-2555 dale.dietzel@ch.doe.gov

71

SRS - Area Completion Projects - Federal Facility Agreement and Supporting  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5/2013 5/2013 SEARCH GO spacer Administrative Record File/Information Repository File Federal Facility Agreement and Supporting Documentation General Information and Technologies Public Involvement Home SRS Home Area Completion Projects Federal Facility Agreement and Supporting Documentation * Federal Facility Agreement -The document that directs the comprehensive remediation of the Savannah River Site Appendix Affected by Modification: Appendix D Issuance of EPA and SCDHEC approved Revision.0 Appendix D for Fiscal Year 2013 (Print Date: 08/27/2013). The SCDHEC provided a comment on the Revision 0 Appendix D for Fiscal Year 2013 (Print Date: 08/27/2013) on Spetember 26, 2013. The EPA provided conditional approval, pending resolution of the SCDHEC's comment, of theRevision 0 Appendix D for Fiscal Year 2013 (Print Date: 08/27/2013) on October 30, 2013.

72

Review of 2XIIB project  

SciTech Connect

A review is given of the 2X project, including project history and recent results, with the intent that both those new to CTR engineering and those people familiar with its progress will benefit. The current 2XII Program plan is reviewed, with emphasis on the major device fabrication underway at the present time. This construction consists primarily of a new magnet for 2XII, and has been designated 2XIIB. The injection of a 800-A neutral beam is described. The final portion of the paper is a progress report and a summary of cost estimates and scheduling. (auth)

Anderson, C.J.

1973-08-20T23:59:59.000Z

73

Post Critical Decision-4 Mark Arenaz, Federal Project Director  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

31, 2011 31, 2011 Lessons Learned from the In-Situ Grouting in the Subsurface Disposal Area Post Critical Decision-4 Mark Arenaz, Federal Project Director Summary Protection of the Snake River Plain Aquifer is a major driver for environmental remediation at the Department of Energy's (DOE) Idaho Site. In 2010, the Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) used in-situ grouting to stabilize buried waste and reduce the migration of specific radioactive contaminates to the aquifer. The action was accomplished using American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Public Law 111-5) Program funding of a capital asset acquisition project under DOE Order 413.3A, Program and Project Management for Acquisition of Capital Assets. Lessons learned from previous subsurface grouting activities contributed to the safe, timely and

74

MSGOUID MONTICELLO PROJECTS ·FEDERAL FACILITIES AGREEMENT REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

MSGOUID MSGOUID MONTICELLO PROJECTS ·FEDERAL FACILITIES AGREEMENT REPORT Report Period: Aprill -June 30, 2006 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS DOE submitted the draft Consolidated LTSM Administrative mid Operating Procedures Manual to EPA and UDEQ on May 4, 2006. Document transmittal met the stipulated penalty milestone of May 6, 2006. Semi-annual ground water and surface water monitoring was completed in May 2006 as scheduled. Three FY 2006 Program Directives were prepared and issued for bio-monitoring tasks to assess selenium accumulation in the environment and identify potential ecological receptors. All field work for FY 2006 bio-monitoring task was completed (five waterfowl surveys in May and June, sediment and surface water sample collection in April for selenium analysis,

75

I have reviewed your Request for Information published in the Federal Register o  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

have reviewed your Request for Information published in the Federal Register on February 27, 2012. I have reviewed your Request for Information published in the Federal Register on February 27, 2012. I would suggest that these are very difficult questions to answer and really vary by the developer, the region and the type of project. There are no canned answers that would fit for responses to the questions raised. I would suggest that a joint workshop be set up with a cross section of industry representatives to meet with members of the Rapid Response Team and explore these questions and the range of answers together. I think it is more important that the RRT understand what developers must go through for generation and transmission projects. It is clear that RRT does understand the variation in schedules between transmission and certain forms of generation. This schedule difference

76

Funding Solar Projects at Federal Agencies: Mechanisms and Selection Criteria (Brochure), Energy Analysis, Series on Financing Renewable Energy Projects  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Introduction Introduction Implementing solar energy projects at federal facilities is a process. The project planning phase of the process includes determining goals, building a team, determining site feasibility, and selecting the appropriate project funding tool. This document gives practical guidance to assist decision-makers with selecting the funding tool that would best meet their site goals. Because project funding tools are complex, federal agencies should seek project assistance before making final decisions. High capital requirements combined with limits on federal agency energy contracts create challenges for funding solar projects. Solar developers typically require long-term contracts (15-20) years to spread out the initial investment and

77

Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project Transportation - September 2000 Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project Transportation - September 2000 September 2000 Transportation Emergency Management Review of the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) and National Transportation Program (NTP)/Transportation Compliance Evaluation/Assistance Program (TCEAP) The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Emergency Management Oversight, within the Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance, conducted a transportation emergency management review of the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) and National Transportation Program (NTP)/Transportation Compliance Evaluation/Assistance Program (TCEAP) in September 2000.

78

EPRI (2004, 2006) Ground-Motion Model Review Project  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This project plan describes the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) (2004, 2006) Ground-Motion Model (GMM) Review Project, which will provide industry with information necessary to respond to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Request for Information to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f), Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Accident, dated March 12, 2012. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the EPRI (2004, 2006)...

2012-06-14T23:59:59.000Z

79

Evaluation of the Impact of EISA Federal Project Investments  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The DOE's Federal Energy Management Program has been charged by Office of Management and Budget to conduct an evaluation on actual and verifiable energy savings and carbon emissions reductions from federal energy management investments made across the Federal government as a result of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. This study presents the findings from that evaluation.

Judd, Kathleen S.; Wendel, Emily M.; Morris, Scott L.; Williamson, Jennifer L.; Halverson, Mark A.; Livingston, Olga V.; Loper, Susan A.

2012-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

80

Developing Renewable Energy Projects Larger Than 10 MWs at Federal Facilities (Book)  

SciTech Connect

To accomplish Federal goals for renewable energy, sustainability, and energy security, large-scale renewable energy projects must be developed and constructed on Federal sites at a significant scale with significant private investment. The U.S. Department of Energy's Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) helps Federal agencies meet these goals and assists agency personnel navigate the complexities of developing such projects and attract the necessary private capital to complete them. This guide is intended to provide a general resource that will begin to develop the Federal employee's awareness and understanding of the project developer's operating environment and the private sector's awareness and understanding of the Federal environment. Because the vast majority of the investment that is required to meet the goals for large-scale renewable energy projects will come from the private sector, this guide has been organized to match Federal processes with typical phases of commercial project development. The main purpose of this guide is to provide a project development framework to allow the Federal Government, private developers, and investors to work in a coordinated fashion on large-scale renewable energy projects. The framework includes key elements that describe a successful, financially attractive large-scale renewable energy project.

Not Available

2013-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Federal Project Director of the Year for 2011 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Project Director of the Year for 2011 Federal Project Director of the Year for 2011 Federal Project Director of the Year for 2011 (from left to right) Daniel Poneman; David Arakawa; Phillip Kraushaar; Johnny Moore; Daniel Lehman; Ingrid Kolb (from left to right) Daniel Poneman; David Arakawa; Phillip Kraushaar; Johnny Moore; Daniel Lehman; Ingrid Kolb Presented to: David K. Arakawa For demonstrating exceptional leadership and project management acumen as Federal Project Director (FPD) for the $68.5 million Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) Instruments - Next Generation (SING) Project at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The SING project provides five best-in-class neutron instruments to support the neutron-scattering needs of the U.S. research community. FPD since June of 2006, David led by example with a

82

Applying Section 404(r) of the Clean Water Act to Federal Projects Which  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Applying Section 404(r) of the Clean Water Act to Federal Projects Applying Section 404(r) of the Clean Water Act to Federal Projects Which Involve the Discharge of Dredged or Fill Materials into Waters of the U.S., Including Wetlands Applying Section 404(r) of the Clean Water Act to Federal Projects Which Involve the Discharge of Dredged or Fill Materials into Waters of the U.S., Including Wetlands This Council on Environmental Quality memorandum establishes procedures for coordinating agency views and formulating Administration policy prior to requesting Congressional action on projects that may be subject to Section 404(r) of the Clean Water Act (Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended). Guidance on Applying Section 404(r) of the Clean Water Act To Federal Projects Which Involve the Discharge of Dredged or Fill Materials into

83

EPRI (2004, 2006) Ground-Motion Model (GMM) Review Project  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report describes the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) (2004, 2006) Ground-Motion Model (GMM) Review Project, which developed an updated GMM for the Central and Eastern United States (CEUS) for use by licensees of nuclear generating plants to respond to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRCs) Request for Information to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f), Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-Ichi ...

2013-06-13T23:59:59.000Z

84

Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 168 - August 29, 2013 Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and...

85

Federal Sector Renewable Energy Project Implementation: "What's Working and Why"  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Sector Renewable Energy Project Federal Sector Renewable Energy Project Implementation: "What's Working and Why" Implementation: What s Working and Why DOD-DOE Waste-to- Energy and Fuel Cell Workshop January 13, 2011 Bob Westby Bob Westby NREL Laboratory Program Manager: Federal Energy Management Program NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC Innovation for Our Energy Future Contents Federal Sector Renewable Energy Project Implementation: "What's Working and Why" "What's Working and Why" ƒ Commercially viable RE technologies ƒ RE project economic drivers ƒ Project construct scenarios ƒ ƒ Implementation mechanisms Implementation mechanisms

86

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Procedures for the Review of Federal and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment October 3, 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 - PURPOSE, POLICY, AND MANDATES 1. Purpose 2. Statutory Authorities 3. Policy CHAPTER 2 - MANAGEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS 1. General Responsibilities 2. Office of Federal Activities ❍ A. Federal Agency Liaisons ❍ B. Management Information Unit 3. Regional Office 4. Program Offices 5. Specific Review Management Responsibilities ❍ A. Headquarters and Regional Environmental Review Coordinators ❍ B. Principal Reviewer ❍ C. Associate Reviewer ❍ D. Consolidation of Comments 6. Routing and Lead Responsibility of EIS's and Other Federal Actions CHAPTER 3 - PRE-EIS REVIEW ACTIVITIES 1. Policy 2. General Liaison

87

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This manual establishes polices and procedures for carrying out the EPA's responsibilities to review and comment on Federal actions affecting the quality of the environment.

88

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This manual establishes policies and procedures for carrying out the Environmental Protection Agency's responsibilities to review and comment on Federal actions affecting the quality of the environment.

89

RD&I meeting Review DOE Projects  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Building the Infrastructure for CO 2 Storage August 21-23,...

90

DOE Selects Projects for up to $50 Million of Federal Funding to Modernize  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Projects for up to $50 Million of Federal Funding to Projects for up to $50 Million of Federal Funding to Modernize the Nation's Electricity Grid DOE Selects Projects for up to $50 Million of Federal Funding to Modernize the Nation's Electricity Grid April 21, 2008 - 10:49am Addthis Demonstration Projects Aim at 15 Percent Reduction of U.S. Peak Load Electricity Demand Washington, DC- U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Assistant Secretary for Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Kevin Kolevar today announced the Department's plans to invest up to $50 million over five years (Fiscal Years 2008 - 2012), subject to appropriations from Congress, in nine demonstration projects competitively selected to increase efficiency in the nation's electricity grid. The Renewable and Distributed Systems Integration (RDSI) technologies demonstrated in these projects aim to

91

DOE Selects Projects for up to $50 Million of Federal Funding to Modernize  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Selects Projects for up to $50 Million of Federal Funding to Selects Projects for up to $50 Million of Federal Funding to Modernize the Nation's Electricity Grid DOE Selects Projects for up to $50 Million of Federal Funding to Modernize the Nation's Electricity Grid April 21, 2008 - 1:43pm Addthis Demonstration Projects Aim at 15 Percent Reduction of U.S. Peak Load Electricity Demand Washington, DC- U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Assistant Secretary for Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Kevin Kolevar today announced the Department's plans to invest up to $50 million over five years (Fiscal Years 2008 - 2012), subject to appropriations from Congress, in nine demonstration projects competitively selected to increase efficiency in the nation's electricity grid. The Renewable and Distributed Systems Integration (RDSI) technologies demonstrated in these projects aim to

92

DOE Selects Five Ethanol Conversion Projects for $23 Million in Federal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Five Ethanol Conversion Projects for $23 Million in Five Ethanol Conversion Projects for $23 Million in Federal Funding DOE Selects Five Ethanol Conversion Projects for $23 Million in Federal Funding March 27, 2007 - 12:10pm Addthis Projects to Develop Fermentative Organisms to Speed Ethanol Refining WASHINGTON, DC - U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Alexander Karsner today announced just over $23 million in federal funding, subject to negotiation of final project plans and funding, for five projects focused on developing highly efficient fermentative organisms to convert biomass material to ethanol. This research will further President Bush's goals of making cellulosic ethanol cost-competitive by 2012 and, along with increased automobile fuel efficiency, reducing America's gasoline consumption by 20 percent in ten

93

DOE Selects Project for up to $7 Million of Federal Funding to Modernize  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Selects Project for up to $7 Million of Federal Funding to Selects Project for up to $7 Million of Federal Funding to Modernize Hawaii's Energy Infrastructure DOE Selects Project for up to $7 Million of Federal Funding to Modernize Hawaii's Energy Infrastructure April 21, 2008 - 1:46pm Addthis University of Hawaii Team to Install Distribution Management System at Maui Substation Honolulu, Hawaii- U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Assistant Secretary for Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE) Kevin Kolevar announced the Department's plans to invest up to $7 million over three years in a demonstration project led by the University of Hawaii's Natural Energy Institute to increase efficiency in the State's energy infrastructure. Assistant Secretary Kolevar was joined by Governor Linda Lingle in making the announcement today in Honolulu. The project, totaling $15 million, is

94

DOE Selects Project for up to $7 Million of Federal Funding to Modernize  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Selects Project for up to $7 Million of Federal Funding to Selects Project for up to $7 Million of Federal Funding to Modernize Hawaii's Energy Infrastructure DOE Selects Project for up to $7 Million of Federal Funding to Modernize Hawaii's Energy Infrastructure April 21, 2008 - 1:46pm Addthis University of Hawaii Team to Install Distribution Management System at Maui Substation Honolulu, Hawaii- U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Assistant Secretary for Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE) Kevin Kolevar announced the Department's plans to invest up to $7 million over three years in a demonstration project led by the University of Hawaii's Natural Energy Institute to increase efficiency in the State's energy infrastructure. Assistant Secretary Kolevar was joined by Governor Linda Lingle in making the announcement today in Honolulu. The project, totaling $15 million, is

95

Funding Solar Projects at Federal Agencies: Mechanisms and Selection Criteria (Brochure)  

SciTech Connect

Implementing solar energy projects at federal facilities is a process. The project planning phase of the process includes determining goals, building a team, determining site feasibility and selecting the appropriate project funding tool. This fact sheet gives practical guidance to assist decision-makers with understanding and selecting the funding tool that would best address their site goals. Because project funding tools are complex, federal agencies should seek project assistance before making final decisions. High capital requirements combined with limits on federal agency energy contracts create challenges for funding solar projects. Solar developers typically require long-term contracts (15-20) years to spread out the initial investment and to enable payments similar to conventional utility bill payments. In the private sector, 20-year contracts have been developed, vetted, and accepted, but the General Services Administration (GSA) contract authority (federal acquisition regulation [FAR] part 41) typically limits contract terms to 10 years. Payments on shorter-term contracts make solar economically unattractive compared with conventional generation. However, in several instances, the federal sector has utilized innovative funding tools that allow long-term contracts or has created a project package that is economically attractive within a shorter contract term.

Not Available

2012-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

96

Wind Project Financing Structures: A Review & Comparative Analysis  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Wind Project Financing Structures: A Review & Comparative Analysis Title Wind Project Financing Structures: A Review & Comparative Analysis Publication Type Report Year of...

97

Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Assistance  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

not receive funding directly. Funding will be provided directly by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to its national laboratories and contractors to provide project assistance....

98

Federal Energy Management Program: FDA Construction Project Serves...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Program: FDA Construction Project Serves as a Super ESPC Model on AddThis.com... Energy Savings Performance Contracts Assistance & Contacts Resources Laws & Regulations...

99

Materials Science Division Project Safety Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Miller, Electron Microscopes Miller, Electron Microscopes Project No. 20006.3 Materials Science Division Project Safety Review Safety Analysis Form (03/08) Date of Submission March 12, 2010 FWP No.: 58405 Project Title User Experimental Work with Electron Microscopes in the Electron Microscopy Center This Safety Analysis Form (SAF) supersedes previous versions of 20006 and its modifications. Is this a (check one) new submission renewal supplemental modification X Principal Investigator(s) Dean Miller Other Participants (excluding administrative support personnel) EMC staff and EMC users (Attach participant signature sheet) Project dates: Start: March 2010 End: Open-ended This form is to be completed for all new investigations or experimental projects that are conducted in MSD laboratories, and for all ongoing such projects that undergo significant change from their original

100

LLNL oil shale project review  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Livermore's oil shale project is funded by two budget authorities, two thirds from base technology development and one third from environmental science. Our base technology development combines fundamental chemistry research with operation of pilot retorts and mathematical modeling. We've studied mechanisms for oil coking and cracking and have developed a detailed model of this chemistry. We combine the detailed chemistry and physics into oil shale process models (OSP) to study scale-up of generic second generation Hot-Recycled-Solid (HRS) retorting systems and compare with results from our 4 tonne-per-day continuous-loop HRS pilot retorting facility. Our environmental science program focuses on identification of gas, solid and liquid effluents from oil shale processes and development of abatement strategies where necessary. We've developed on-line instruments to quantitatively measure trace sulfur and nitrogen compounds released during shale pyrolysis and combustion. We've studied shale mineralogy, inorganic and organic reactions which generate and consume environmentally sensitive species. Figures, references, and tables are included with each discussion.

Cena, R.J. (ed.)

1990-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Post Critical Decision-4 Mark Arenaz, Federal Project Director  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

design has been a factor in the success of grouting and in the pilot scale tests for the sodium-bearing waste treatment system (a concurrent ICP project). The risk register...

102

FEDERAL ACQUISITION CERTIFICATION FOR PROGRAM AND PROJECT MANAGERS (FAC-P/PM)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CERTIFICATION FOR PROGRAM AND PROJECT CERTIFICATION FOR PROGRAM AND PROJECT MANAGERS (FAC-P/PM) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Purpose. The Federal Acquisition Certification for Program and Project Managers (FAC-P/PM) establishes general training and experience requirements for program and project managers in civilian agencies. The FAC- P/PM focuses on essential competencies needed for program and project managers; the program does not include functional or technical competencies, such as those for information technology, or agency- specific competencies. 2. Background. The quality and effectiveness of the federal acquisition process depend on the development of a capable and competent workforce. The Services Acquisition Reform Act of 2003 (SARA, P.L. 108-136) expanded the definition of acquisition to include functions performed by program and project managers.

103

TUCAP-ETO-STATCOM Project Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE ESS ANNUAL PEER REVIEW DOE ESS ANNUAL PEER REVIEW 11/02/06 ETO Light Power Converter for FACTS & Energy Storage Applications Principal Investigator: Prof Alex Q. Huang Semiconductor Power Electronics Center (SPEC) North Carolina State University, Raleigh SNL Project Manager: Stan Atcitty DOE Manager: Dr. Imre Gyuk 2 DOE ESS ANNUAL PEER REVIEW 11/02/06 Develop a modular VSC for multiple FACTS and energy storage applications with goals of achieving 1. Lower cost * Using lower cost power devices * Reducing component parts * Modular approach 2. Higher reliability * Reducing components parts 3. High power density * Better utilization of silicon * Reducing component parts FY2006 Project Objectives 3 DOE ESS ANNUAL PEER REVIEW 11/02/06 ETO Light TM Power Converter Light triggered ETO 4500V/4000A 2 kW heatpipe

104

Bonneville Project Act, Federal Columbia River Transmission System Act and Other Related Legislation.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Legislative texts are provided for: Bonneville Project Act which authorizes the completion, maintenance, and operation of Bonneville project for navigation, and for other purposes; Federal Columbia River Transmission system Act which enables the Secretary of the Interior to provide for operation, maintenance, and continued construction of the Federal transmission system in the Pacific Northwest by use of the revenues of the Federal Columbia River Power System and the proceeds of revenue bonds, and for other purposes; public law 88--552 which guarantees electric consumers of the Pacific Northwest first call on electric energy generated at Federal hydroelectric plants in that regions and reciprocal priority, and for other purposes; and public law 78--329 which provides for the partial construction of the Hungary Horse Dam on the South Fork of the Flathead River in the state of Montana, and for other purposes

Not Available

1985-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

105

Renewable Energy Project Financing: Impacts of the Financial Crisis and Federal Legislation  

SciTech Connect

Extraordinary financial market conditions have disrupted the flows of equity and debt investment into U.S. renewable energy (RE) projects since the fourth quarter of 2008. The pace and structure of renewable energy project finance has been reshaped by a combination of forces, including the financial crisis, global economic recession, and major changes in federal legislation affecting renewable energy finance. This report explores the impacts of these key market events on renewable energy project financing and development.

Schwabe, P.; Cory, K.; Newcomb, J.

2009-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

106

Summary of Initial Examination of Lighting-Only Utility Projects in the Federal Sector  

SciTech Connect

This work complements earlier work on an analysis of Federal utility energy projects that implemented excusively lighting upgrades. The objective of this analysis is to better understand the lighting-only projects through determination of the relationship of capital invested and the resulting energy and cost savings, in terms of geographic locale, project size, and potential according to specific lighting technologies and/or control technology implemented.

Solana, Amy E.; Sandusky, William F.; McMordie-Stoughton, Katherine L.

2007-07-26T23:59:59.000Z

107

FEDERAL FACILITY COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT (FFCA) STACK ISOLATION PROJECT FUNCTIONS & REQUIREMENTS  

SciTech Connect

This document delineates the functions and requirements for the FFCA Stack Isolation Project for the 244-A, 244-BX, 244-5, and 244-TX DCRTs. The isolation of each ventilation system and stack includes the electrical, instrumentation, and mechanical isolation of the ventilation system and the installation of primary and annulus breather filters to provide passive ventilation to meet the FFCA requirements.

TRANBARGER, R.K.

2003-12-16T23:59:59.000Z

108

Review of activities and plans for solar energy in Federal buildings  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to provide the Department of Energy's Solar Federal Buildings Program with data on the Federal agencies' activities and plans regarding the use of solar energy in their buildings, and consequently, to make recommendations concerning the Solar Federal Buildings Program's plans. Specifically this report encompasses an analysis of agencies Ten Year Buildings construction, leasing and retrofit plans to provide visibility for and detailed knowledge of Federal agencies planning regarding solar and other renewable energy resources. The results of the analysis conducted, pertinent statistical information regarding planned solar projects, and recommendations concerning the SFBP plans are presented.

Not Available

1980-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

109

Reviewing Measurement and Verification Plans for Federal ESPC...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Review Template. O&M cost savings are generally determined and verified separately from energy and water savings. * Principal review efforts should be focused on the measures...

110

Enabling Mass-Scale Financing for Federal Energy, Water, and Sustainability Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Mass-Scale Financing Mass-Scale Financing for Federal Energy, Water And Sustainability Projects Leslie Nicholls Energetics Inc. 1 Requirements for increased federal energy and water efficiency as well as reduced greenhouse gas emissions and sustainable federal facility operations have increased substantially over the past few years. Requirements are most likely to become even more challenging in the years to come. Fill the gap Why ENABLE? 2 The requirement to perform energy audits on "covered" federal facilities will result in about 20-25 thousand buildings audited per year for the foreseeable future The requirement to commission existing buildings wherever deemed to be practicable will be significant. FEMP estimates required investment: $1 billion per year

111

Joint nuclear safety research projects between the US and Russian Federation International Nuclear Safety Centers  

SciTech Connect

The Russian Federation Ministry for Atomic Energy (MINATOM) and the US Department of Energy (USDOE) formed international Nuclear Safety Centers in October 1995 and July 1996, respectively, to collaborate on nuclear safety research. Since January 1997, the two centers have initiated the following nine joint research projects: (1) INSC web servers and databases; (2) Material properties measurement and assessment; (3) Coupled codes: Neutronic, thermal-hydraulic, mechanical and other; (4) Severe accident management for Soviet-designed reactors; (5) Transient management and advanced control; (6) Survey of relevant nuclear safety research facilities in the Russian Federation; (8) Advanced structural analysis; and (9) Development of a nuclear safety research and development plan for MINATOM. The joint projects were selected on the basis of recommendations from two groups of experts convened by NEA and from evaluations of safety impact, cost, and deployment potential. The paper summarizes the projects, including the long-term goals, the implementing strategy and some recent accomplishments for each project.

Bougaenko, S.E.; Kraev, A.E. [International Nuclear Safety Center of the Russian MINATOM, Moscow (Russian Federation); Hill, D.L.; Braun, J.C.; Klickman, A.E. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States). International Nuclear Safety Center

1998-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

112

M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Federal Energy Projects  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Guidelines: Guidelines: Measurement and Verifi cation for Federal Energy Projects Version 3.0 M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Federal Energy Projects Version 3.0 Prepared For: U.S. Department of Energy Federal Energy Management Program www1.eere.energy.gov/femp/ Prepared By: Nexant, Inc. 1401 Walnut Street, Suite 400 Boulder, CO 80302 Tel: 303.402.2480 www.nexant.com Under Subcontract To: EMP2, Inc. www.emp2.com April 2008 FEMP M&V Guidelines 3.0 i Acknowledgements This document was prepared by Lia Webster and James Bradford of Nexant, Inc. in Boulder, Colorado. Contributors to this document include: Dale Sartor of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, John Shonder and Erica Atkin of Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and Steve Dunnivant of EMP2. Other materials were developed by various industry-government

113

M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Federal Energy Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

M&V Guidelines: M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verifi cation for Federal Energy Projects Version 3.0 M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Federal Energy Projects Version 3.0 Prepared For: U.S. Department of Energy Federal Energy Management Program www1.eere.energy.gov/femp/ Prepared By: Nexant, Inc. 1401 Walnut Street, Suite 400 Boulder, CO 80302 Tel: 303.402.2480 www.nexant.com Under Subcontract To: EMP2, Inc. www.emp2.com April 2008 FEMP M&V Guidelines 3.0 i Acknowledgements This document was prepared by Lia Webster and James Bradford of Nexant, Inc. in Boulder, Colorado. Contributors to this document include: Dale Sartor of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, John Shonder and Erica Atkin of Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and Steve Dunnivant of EMP2. Other materials were developed by various industry-government

114

M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Federal Energy Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Guidelines: Guidelines: Measurement and Verifi cation for Federal Energy Projects Version 3.0 M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Federal Energy Projects Version 3.0 Prepared For: U.S. Department of Energy Federal Energy Management Program www1.eere.energy.gov/femp/ Prepared By: Nexant, Inc. 1401 Walnut Street, Suite 400 Boulder, CO 80302 Tel: 303.402.2480 www.nexant.com Under Subcontract To: EMP2, Inc. www.emp2.com April 2008 FEMP M&V Guidelines 3.0 i Acknowledgements This document was prepared by Lia Webster and James Bradford of Nexant, Inc. in Boulder, Colorado. Contributors to this document include: Dale Sartor of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, John Shonder and Erica Atkin of Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and Steve Dunnivant of EMP2. Other materials were developed by various industry-government

115

Amended Notice of Intent for the Northern Pass Transmission Line Project Published in the Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Department of Energy announces its intent to modify the scope of the Northern Pass Transmission Line Project Environmental Impact Statement and to conduct additional public scoping meetings. The Federal Register Notice, which is now available for downloading, includes information on how to submit comments and participate in the additional public scoping meetings.

116

Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands (216(h)) |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands (216(h)) Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands (216(h)) Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands (216(h)) On October 23, 2009, the Department of Energy and eight other Federal agencies entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to improve coordination among project applicants, federal agencies, states and tribes involved in the siting and permitting process for electric transmission facilities on Federal land. The MOU will improve uniformity, consistency, and transparency by describing each entity's role and responsibilities when project applicants wish to build electric transmission facilities. Additionally, the MOU designates a "Lead Agency" serving as the single point-of-contact for coordinating all federal environmental reviews

117

The Role of The fedeRal PRojecT diRecToR  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Role of The fedeRal PRojecT diRecToR: Role of The fedeRal PRojecT diRecToR: lessons fRom The naTional igniTion faciliTy The national ignition facility (nif) is home of the world's largest laser. With 192 laser beams that can deliver more than 60 times the energy of any previous laser system, NIF represents a significant step in enabling the study of high-energy density science, and should demonstrate fusion ignition and burn in the laboratory for the first time. The design and construction of this unique, highly complex facility posed management challenges that the project team overseeing its development could not foresee. The national ignition facility's final optics assemblies, shown here mounted on the lower hemisphere of the target chamber, contain

118

NEPA and CEQA: Integrating State and Federal Environmental Reviews...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Governor's Office of Planning and Research, issued on March 5, 2013, a draft handbook on integrating NEPA and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review processes....

119

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient Product Procurement Portfolio  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Energy-Efficient Product Procurement (EEPP) Portfolio Meeting: Washington D.C., Dec. 4, 2012 Reviewers: David Goldstein (Chair), Harvey Sachs, Cyndi Vallina, Marina Moses, and Shahzeen Attari Review: Jan. 25, 2013 Summary The Review Committee met in Washington, D.C., and engaged in a day-long discussion with FEMP EEPP staff and contractors. Program staff gave clear and effective presentations, and we had extensive and illuminating discussions with the staff, and to a limited extent with other interested parties who attended. The Committee worked together after the meeting and by email to produce this review. Our review addresses: * strategic issues with respect to the program,

120

Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group (LFRG) | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Management » Compliance » Low-Level Waste Program Management » Compliance » Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group (LFRG) Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group (LFRG) The Office of Environmental Management (EM) Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group (LFRG) was established to fulfill the requirements contained in Section I.2.E(1)(a) of the Department of Energy (DOE) Order 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management, and exercised by the senior managers of EM. The LFRG assists EM senior managers in the review of documentation that supports the approval of performance assessments and composite analyses or appropriate Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)documents as described in Section II of the LFRG Charter. Through its efforts, the LFRG supports the issuance

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Hanford Sludge Treatment Project Review, June 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1-06-17 1-06-17 Site: DOE-Richland Operations Office Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Sludge Treatment Project Dates of Activity : 06/13/2011 - 06/17/2011 Report Preparer: Jake Wechselberger Activity Description/Purpose: The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed operational awareness reviews of the Sludge Treatment Project (STP), Engineered Container Retrieval and Transfer System (ECRTS) during site visits. Result: During the period June 13-17, 2011, an HSS representative participated in tours of the STP test facility. The HSS representative was also briefed by the CHPRC STP Test Director and the DOE-Richland Operations Office principal support

122

Renewable Energy Project Financing: Impacts of the Financial Crisis and Federal Legislation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

930 930 July 2009 Renewable Energy Project Financing: Impacts of the Financial Crisis and Federal Legislation Paul Schwabe, Karlynn Cory, and James Newcomb National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 * www.nrel.gov NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC Contract No. DE-AC36-08-GO28308 Technical Report NREL/TP-6A2-44930 July 2009 Renewable Energy Project Financing: Impacts of the Financial Crisis and Federal Legislation Paul Schwabe, Karlynn Cory, and James Newcomb Prepared under Task No. SAO7.9B30 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government.

123

Microsoft PowerPoint - Vicksburg District Federal Power Projects Branson Conf. 6-2-10 .pptx  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Vicksburg Vicksburg District Federal Power Projects Vicksburg District Federal Power Projects Blakely Mountain Hydro DeGray Hydro DeGray Hydro Narrows Hydro Blakely Mountain Rewind Unit #1 ll Rotor Installation Blakely Mountain Rewind Unit #2 l l Coil Removal Blakely Mountain Rewind Unit #2 l Pole Key Design Blakely Mountain Rewind Unit #2 i l i h l d Removing Pole Key With Sledge Hammer Blakely Rewind Unit #2 Bigger Hammer & Operator Blakely Mountain Rewind Unit #2 l h Removing Rotor Poles With A Saw Blakely Mountain Surge Tank f b h Refurbishment Blakely Mountain Surge Tank f b h Refurbishment Blakely Mountain Switchyard d Disconnect Upgrades Blakely Mountain Switchyard l Oil Containment DeGray Rewind Unit # 2 bl Disassembly DeGray Rewind Unit #2 l l First Coil Samples

124

Advanced Sensors and Instrumentation Annual Project Review 2013 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Advanced Sensors and Instrumentation Annual Project Review 2013 Advanced Sensors and Instrumentation Annual Project Review 2013 Advanced Sensors and Instrumentation Annual Project Review 2013 The Advanced Sensors and Instrumentation (ASI) element of the Nuclear Energy Enabling Technologies (NEET) program conducted its first Annual Project Review Meeting on May 21-22, 2013 in Germantown, Maryland. The purpose of this meeting was to review the status of the 10 ASI projects initiated in FY 2012. The meeting summary and project presentations are available here. ASI Project Review Summary ASI Overview High Temperature Fission Chamber Micro-Pocket Fission Detectors Irradiation Testing of Ultrasonic Transducers Recalibration Methodology Digital Technology Qualification Design for Fault Tolerance and Resilience Sensor Degradation Control Systems

125

Incorporating livability benefits into the Federal Transit Administration New Starts project evaluation process through accessibility-based modeling  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The Department of Transportation's announcement of the "Livability initiative" for major transit projects in January 2010 has prompted the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to reassess the criteria used in the evaluation ...

Ducas, Caroline R. (Caroline Rose)

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

126

Independent Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site - April 2001 Independent Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site - April 2001 April 2001 Special Review of the Rocky Flats Closure Project Site The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Environment, Safety, and Health Oversight (EH-2), within the Office of Environment, Safety and Health, conducted an independent oversight Special Review at the Rocky Flats Closure Project (RFCP). The Special Review was conducted at the request of the Rocky Flats Field Office (RFFO), which is the DOE organizational element with responsibility for the RFCP (formerly known as the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site). Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC (KH) is the prime contractor for the RFCP. RFCP's project-oriented approach and aggressive scheduling have resulted

127

South Fork Tolt River Hydroelectric Project : Adopted Portions of a 1987 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission`s Final Environmental Impact Statement.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The South Fork Tolt River Hydroelectric Project that world produce 6.55 average megawatts of firm energy per year and would be sited in the Snohomish River Basin, Washington, was evaluated by the Federal Energy Regulatory commission (FERC) along with six other proposed projects for environmental effects and economic feasibility Based on its economic analysis and environmental evaluation of the project, the FERC staff found that the South Fork Tolt River Project would be economically feasible and would result in insignificant Impacts if sedimentation issues could be resolved. Upon review, the BPA is adopting portions of the 1987 FERC FEIS that concern the South Fork Tolt River Hydroelectric Project and updating specific sections in an Attachment.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1992-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

128

Energy and Utility Project Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Utility Project Review and Utility Project Review Energy and Utility Project Review < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Developer Fed. Government Fuel Distributor General Public/Consumer Industrial Installer/Contractor Institutional Investor-Owned Utility Local Government Low-Income Residential Multi-Family Residential Nonprofit Residential Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative Schools Systems Integrator Transportation Tribal Government Utility Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State Wisconsin Program Type Siting and Permitting Provider Department of Natural Resources The DNR's Office of Energy and Environmental Analysis is responsible for coordinating the review of all proposed energy and utility projects in the

129

Federal policies to promote the widespread utilization of photovoltaic systems. Supplement: review and critique  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document is intended as a supplement to the two-volume report entitled Federal Policies to Promote the Widespread Utilization of Photovoltaic Systems that was submitted to Congress by the Department of Energy in February and April of 1980. This supplement contains review comments prepared by knowledgeable experts who reviewed early drafts of the Congressional report. Responses to the review comments by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, preparer of the Congressional report, are also included in this supplement. The Congressional report, mandated in the Solar Photovoltaic Energy Research, Development, and Demonstration Act of 1978 (P.L. 95-590), discusses various issues related to promoting the deployment of photovoltaic systems through the Federal Photovoltaic Program. Various program strategies and funding levels are examined.

Smith, J.L.

1980-04-15T23:59:59.000Z

130

US Synthetic Fuels Corporation's proposal to award the Great Plains project $820 million in additional Federal financial assistance. Hearing before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, Ninety-Ninth Congress, First Session, May 22, 1985  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Subcommittee on Environment, Energy, and Natural Resources reviewed the financial situation of the Great Plains coal gasification plant in North Dakota. The sponsors of the project are requesting an additional $820 million in Federal assistance because they cannot operate the plant and pay back the $1.46 billion already borrowed from the taxpayers with the current trend towards lower energy prices. The possibility of abandoning the project is discussed, but most speakers believe every effort should be made to continue the project with the least amount of Federal involvement.

Not Available

1986-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

131

Independent Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site - April 2001 Independent Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site - April 2001 April 2001 Special Review of the Rocky Flats Closure Project Site The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Environment, Safety, and Health Oversight (EH-2), within the Office of Environment, Safety and Health, conducted an independent oversight Special Review at the Rocky Flats Closure Project (RFCP). The Special Review was conducted at the request of the Rocky Flats Field Office (RFFO), which is the DOE organizational element with responsibility for the RFCP (formerly known as the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site). Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC (KH) is the prime contractor for the RFCP.

132

Continuous Fiber Ceramic Composite (CFCC) Program. Inventory of federally funded CFCC R&D projects  

SciTech Connect

Continuous Fiber Ceramic Composites (CFCC) are a new class of materials that are lighter, stronger, more corrosion resistant, and capable of performing at elevated temperatures. This new type of material offers the potential to meet the demands of a variety of industrial, military, and aerospace applications. The Department of Energy Office of Industrial Technologies (OIT) has a new program on CFCCs for industrial applications and this program has requested an inventory of all federal projects on CFCCs that relate to their new program. The purpose of this project is to identify all other ongoing CFCC research to avoid redundancy in the OIT Program. The inventory will be used as a basis for coordinating with the other ongoing ceramic composite projects. The inventory is divided into two main parts. The first part is concerned with CFCC supporting technologies projects and is organized by the categories listed below. (1) Composite Design; (2) Materials Characterization; (3) Test Methods; (4) Non-Destructive Evaluation; (5) Environmental Effects; (6) Mechanical Properties; (7) Database Life Prediction; (8) Fracture/Damage; and (9) Joining. The second part has information on component development, fabrication, and fiber-related projects.

Richlen, S. [USDOE Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Washington, DC (United States). Office of Industrial Technologies; Caton, G.M.; Karnitz, M.A.; Cox, T.D. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States); Hong, W. [Institute for Defense Analyses, Alexandria, VA (United States)

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

133

A Compilation and Review of Alaska Energy Projects  

SciTech Connect

There have been many energy projects proposed in Alaska over the past several decades, from large scale hydro projects that have never been built to small scale village power projects to use local alternative energy sources, many of which have also not been built. This project was initially intended to review these rejected projects to evaluate the economic feasibility of these ideas in the light of current economics. This review included contacting the agencies responsible for reviewing and funding these projects in Alaska, including the Alaska Energy Authority, the Denali Commission, and the Arctic Energy Technology Development Laboratory, obtaining available information about these projects, and analyzing the economic data. Unfortunately, the most apparent result of this effort was that the data associated with these projects was not collected in a systematic way that allowed this information to be analyzed.

Arlon Tussing; Steve Colt

2008-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

134

Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Contractor - June 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Contractor - June 2012 June 2012 Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Integrated Waste Treatment Unit Contractor Operational Readiness Review This report documents the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), independent review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project-Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (SBWTP-IWTU) contractor Operational Readiness Review (C-ORR). The review was conducted at the Idaho Site from February 27 to March 6, 2012. This report discusses the background, scope, results, and conclusions of the review, as well as

135

Independent Oversight Review, Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review, Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Review, Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project - April 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project - April 2013 April 2013 Review of Radiation Protection Program Implementation at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project of the Idaho Site This report documents an independent review of activity-level radiation protection program (RPP) implementation at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) of the Idaho Site, as conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations. The purpose of this Independent Oversight targeted review

136

Construction Project Safety and Health Plan RM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Construction Project Safety and Health Plan (CPSHP) Review Module is a tool that assists DOE federal project review teams in evaluating the technical sufficiency of the project readiness in...

137

EIA-Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006) Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006) Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006) Each year since 1996, EIA's Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting has produced a comparison between realized energy outcomes and the projections included in previous editions of the AEO. Each year, the comparison adds the projections from the most recent AEO and updates the historical data to the most recently available. The comparison summarizes the relationship of the AEO reference case projections since 1982 to realized outcomes by calculating the average absolute percent differences for several of the major variables for AEO82 through AEO2006. Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review, 2006 Report

138

DOE G 413.3-9, U.S. Department of Energy Project Review Guide for Capital Asset Projects  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This Guide addresses the various project reviews conducted during the life-cycle of a project based on the stage, complexity and duration of a project. This ...

2008-09-23T23:59:59.000Z

139

Project review for the acquisition executive  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A set of view graphs for briefing the acquisition executive for the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project are presented.

NONE

1986-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

140

Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor - June 2012 Contractor - June 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Contractor - June 2012 June 2012 Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Integrated Waste Treatment Unit Contractor Operational Readiness Review This report documents the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), independent review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project-Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (SBWTP-IWTU) contractor Operational Readiness Review (C-ORR). The review was conducted at the Idaho Site from February 27 to March 6, 2012. This report discusses the background, scope, results, and conclusions of the review, as well as opportunities for improvement (OFIs) and items identified for further

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Advanced Sensors and Instrumentation 2013 ANNUAL PROJECT REVIEW  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Advanced Sensors and Instrumentation Advanced Sensors and Instrumentation 2013 ANNUAL PROJECT REVIEW MEETING SUMMARY Germantown, MD May 21-22, 2013 ASI 2013 Annual Project Review Meeting Summary May 21-22, 2013 1 Introduction The Advanced Sensors and Instrumentation (ASI) element of the Nuclear Energy Enabling Technologies (NEET) Program conducted its first Annual Project Review Meeting on May 21-22, 2013 in Germantown, Maryland with video links to other Department of Energy (DOE) National Laboratory sites. The purpose of the meeting was to review the 10 on-going ASI projects with presentations made by the research principal investigators. The presentations addressed the objectives and expected outcomes of research, and summarized technical performance and accomplishments since project inception. The

142

Independent Oversight Review, Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project - April 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project - April 2013 April 2013 Review of Radiation Protection Program Implementation at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project of the Idaho Site This report documents an independent review of activity-level radiation protection program (RPP) implementation at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) of the Idaho Site, as conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations. The purpose of this Independent Oversight targeted review

143

DOE publishes guide to state and federal laws for ER projects  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy has published a guide of federal and state environmental laws and regulations that affect enhanced recovery projects. The primary emphasis of the publication is on prevention and control of air and water pollution, protection of underground water sources, and management of solid wastes. Only laws and regulations that apply specifically to features unique to EOR, such as emissions for steam generators or underground injections of chemicals, are dealt with. The National Environmental Policy Act of 1979, the Coastal Zone Management Act, the Endangered Species Act, and the Noise Control Act, prinicpal federal laws affecting the siting or operation of EOR facilities, are listed in the handbook, and requirements under these laws are detailed. Tentative requirements under some environmental laws not yet implemented, such as the Underground Injection Control and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, also are included. The relevant state environmental laws, regulation and permit requirements of 16 major oil-producing states where EOR techniques are important, or could become important, to future oil recovery, are included in the handbook (Alabama, California, Colorado, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, New Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas, West Virginia, and Wyoming).

Not Available

1981-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

144

Response to Director's Review of Fermilab Project Management Improvement Initiatives  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Response to Director's Review of Fermilab Project Management Improvement Initiatives Response to Director's Review of Fermilab Project Management Improvement Initiatives May 14, 2013 Executive Summary Fermilab is entering a new, transitional era defined by the transformation from operating a very large experimental facility over several decades to managing and delivering a portfolio of new projects within technical performance, budget and schedule expectations. Throughout CY12, internal and external reviews identified some systemic weaknesses in execution of some construction activities and fabrication of components, including procurement planning and execution, cost estimating, and internal project communication. These Project Management System concerns have the potential to impact other projects and operational activities at the Laboratory if not addressed. Coincident with the

145

Developing Renewable Energy Projects Larger Than 10 MWs at Federal Facilities (Book), Large-Scale Renewable Energy Guide, Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

LARGE-SCALE RENEWABLE ENERGY GUIDE LARGE-SCALE RENEWABLE ENERGY GUIDE Developing Renewable Energy Projects Larger Than 10 MWs at Federal Facilities A Practical Guide to Getting Large-Scale Renewable Energy Projects Financed with Private Capital Cover photos, clockwise from the top: Installing mirrored parabolic trough collectors - (January 19, 2012) Crews work around the clock installing mirrored parabolic trough collectors, built on site, that will cover 3 square miles at Abengoa's Solana Plant. Solana a 280 megawatt utility scale solar power plant (CSP) under construction in Gila Bend, Arizona, USA. When finished it will generate 280 MW 's of clean, sustainable power serving over 70,000 Arizona homes. Photo by Dennis Schroeder, NREL 20097 Dry Lake Wind Power Project in Arizona; Suzlon S88 wind turbines - The 63-MW Dry Lake Wind Power Project in Arizona is the first

146

Developing Renewable Energy Projects Larger Than 10 MWs at Federal Facilities (Book), Large-Scale Renewable Energy Guide, Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

LARGE-SCALE RENEWABLE ENERGY GUIDE LARGE-SCALE RENEWABLE ENERGY GUIDE Developing Renewable Energy Projects Larger Than 10 MWs at Federal Facilities A Practical Guide to Getting Large-Scale Renewable Energy Projects Financed with Private Capital Cover photos, clockwise from the top: Installing mirrored parabolic trough collectors - (January 19, 2012) Crews work around the clock installing mirrored parabolic trough collectors, built on site, that will cover 3 square miles at Abengoa's Solana Plant. Solana a 280 megawatt utility scale solar power plant (CSP) under construction in Gila Bend, Arizona, USA. When finished it will generate 280 MW 's of clean, sustainable power serving over 70,000 Arizona homes. Photo by Dennis Schroeder, NREL 20097 Dry Lake Wind Power Project in Arizona; Suzlon S88 wind turbines - The 63-MW Dry Lake Wind Power Project in Arizona is the first

147

Demonstration Development Project: Large-Scale Post-Combustion CO2 Capture Retrofit Demonstration Project Review  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) has reviewed proposed demonstration sites for retrofitting post-combustion CO2 capture onto an existing coal-fired plant. This report discusses and reviews this set of demonstration projects to provide background information and the rationale for EPRI to pursue being involved in one or more of these projects.

2010-12-17T23:59:59.000Z

148

Focused Review of the River Protection Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

known as the 241-A tank farm complex. The Aging Waste Essential Systems Review 3.0 CONDENSER COOLING TOWER MOISTURE SEPERATOR RECIRC.FAN GLYCOL LOOP GLYCOL LOOP GLYCOL LOOP...

149

Federal and State Structures to Support Financing Utility-Scale Solar Projects and the Business Models Designed to Utilize Them  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal and State Structures to Federal and State Structures to Support Financing Utility-Scale Solar Projects and the Business Models Designed to Utilize Them Michael Mendelsohn and Claire Kreycik Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-48685 April 2012 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, Colorado 80401 303-275-3000 * www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Federal and State Structures to Support Financing Utility-Scale Solar Projects and the Business Models Designed to Utilize Them Michael Mendelsohn and Claire Kreycik Prepared under Task No. CP09.2320

150

Federal and State Structures to Support Financing Utility-Scale Solar Projects and the Business Models Designed to Utilize Them  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Utility-scale solar projects have grown rapidly in number and size over the last few years, driven in part by strong renewable portfolio standards (RPS) and federal incentives designed to stimulate investment in renewable energy technologies. This report provides an overview of such policies, as well as the project financial structures they enable, based on industry literature, publicly available data, and questionnaires conducted by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL).

Mendelsohn, M.; Kreycik, C.

2012-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

151

A Review of Wind Project Financing Structures in the USA  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The rapid pace of wind power development in the U.S. over the last decade has outstripped the ability of most project developers to provide adequate equity capital and make efficient use of project-related tax benefits. In response, the sector has created novel project financing structures that feature varying combinations of equity capital from project developers and third-party tax-oriented investors, and in some cases commercial debt. While their origins stem from variations in the financial capacity and business objectives of wind project developers, as well as the risk tolerances and objectives of equity and debt providers, each structure is, at its core, designed to manage project risk and allocate federal tax incentives to those entities that can use them most efficiently. This article surveys the six principal financing structures through which most new utility-scale wind projects (excluding utility-owned projects) in the U.S. have been financed from 1999 to the present. These structures include simple balance-sheet finance, several varieties of all-equity special allocation partnership 'flip' structures, and two leveraged structures. In addition to describing each structure's mechanics, the article also discusses its rationale for use, the types of investors that find it appealing and why, and its relative frequency of use in the market. The article concludes with a generalized summary of how a developer might choose one structure over another.

Bolinger, Mark A; Harper, John; Karcher, Matthew

2008-09-24T23:59:59.000Z

152

EIA-Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

9) 9) Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2009) Each year since 1996, EIA's Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting has produced a comparison between realized energy outcomes and the projections included in previous editions of the AEO. Each year, the comparison adds the projections from the most recent AEO and updates the historical data to the most recently available. The comparison summarizes the relationship of the AEO reference case projections since 1982 to realized outcomes by calculating the average absolute percent differences for several of the major variables for AEO82 through AEO2009. Annual Energy Outlook Restrospective Review, 2009 Report pdf images Table 1. Comparison of Absolute Percent Difference between AEO Reference Case Projections

153

Focused Review of the River Protection Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................... 5 2.0 EVALUATION OF THE CORE FUNCTIONS .......................... 9 2.1 Core Function #1 - Define the Scope of Work ................... 9 2.2 Core Function #2 - Analyze the Hazards......................... 11 2.3 Core Function #3 - Develop and Implement Hazard Controls ............................................................... 13 2.4 Core Function #4 - Perform Work Within Controls ....... 16 2.5 Core Function #5 - Provide Feedback and Continuous Improvement ................................................ 19 3.0 ESSENTIAL SYSTEMS REVIEW ........................................... 26 3.1 Engineering Design and Analysis .................................... 27 3.2 Unreviewed Safety Question Process

154

History of prior federal action and NEPA documentation for NCPA Project No. 2  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The federal actions are documented that were performed to ensure environmental protection during the leasing, exploration, development and utilization of geothermal resources on those public lands of The Geysers KGRA in California associated with the proposed Northern California Power Agency (NCPA) Geothermal Project No. 2. Approval for development of these geothermal resources on public lands in The Geysers KGRA was preceded by extensive environmental analyses conducted over the past decade by the US Department of Interior, and its agencies. These analyses include the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Geothermal Leasing Program, an Environmental Analysis Record for the selected lease areas in The Geysers KGRA, and site specific Environmental Assessments. All of these documents were prepared to comply with policies, purposes, and goals of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 and pertinent state and local environmental protection standards. In addition, these documents contain the environmental protection stipulations which must be agreed to by Shell Oil Company (the geothermal steam provider) and NCPA (the electric power plant builder operator) before development and utilization can begin.

Daniels, J.I.

1979-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

155

Status Report: EM Acquisition and Project Management Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report: Acquisition and Project Report: Acquisition and Project Management Review August 15, 2006 Submitted by: Mr. James Ajello and Mr. Dennis Ferrigno Background: The Environmental Management Advisory Board is in the process of providing Jack Surash, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Acquisition and Project Management (EM-50), records of past EMAB recommendations and commentary. Mr. Ajello and Mr. Ferrigno believe that the records will be helpful to Mr. Surash and his staff. EMAB has identified the following actionable items: Provide Mr. Surash with EMAB committee files for review Have Mr. Ferrigno contact Mr. Surash to arrange a meeting for discussion of said materials Have Mr. Ajello and Mr. Ferrigno meet with Mr. Surash periodically to discuss project management and contract issues, as per request of EM-1.

156

EIA-Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

8) 8) Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2008) Each year since 1996, EIA's Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting has produced a comparison between realized energy outcomes and the projections included in previous editions of the AEO. Each year, the comparison adds the projections from the most recent AEO and updates the historical data to the most recently available. The comparison summarizes the relationship of the AEO reference case projections since 1982 to realized outcomes by calculating the average absolute percent differences for several of the major variables for AEO82 through AEO2008. Annual Energy Outlook Restrospective Review, 2008 Report Revisions to Gross Domestic Product and Implications for the Comparisons

157

Special Review of the Rocky Flats Closure Project Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April April 2001 Special Review of the Integrated Safety Management ISM OVERSIGHT Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................... 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 6 2.0 FOCUSED REVIEW OF THE INTEGRATED WORK CONTROL PROCESS AND LINE MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT .............................................................................................. 8 2.1 Background ...................................................................................... 8 2.2 Line Management Oversight and Selected Other Management Systems .................................................................... 10 2.3 Rocky Flats Closure Project Integrated Work Control Process

158

EIA-Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review-Evaluation of Projections in  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

8) 8) The Energy Information Administration (EIA) produces projections of energy supply and demand each year in the Annual Energy Outlook (AEO). The projections in the AEO are not statements of what will happen but of what might happen, given the assumptions and methodologies used. The projections are business-as-usual trend projections, given known technology, technological and demographic trends, and current laws and regulations. The potential impacts of pending or proposed legislation, regulations, and standards-or of sections of legislation that have been enacted but that require implementing regulations or appropriation of funds that are not provided or specified in the legislation itself-are not reflected in the projections. The AEO is based on only then current Federal and State laws and regulations. Thus, the AEO provides a policy-neutral reference case that can be used to analyze policy initiatives. The analyses in the AEO primarily focuses on a reference case, lower and higher economic growth cases, and lower and higher energy price cases. However, more than 30 alternative cases are generally included in the AEO. Readers are encouraged to review the full range of cases, which address many of the uncertainties inherent in long-term projections.

159

River Protection Project Integrated safety management system phase II verification review plan - 7/29/99  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this review is to verify the implementation status of the Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) for the River Protection Project (RPP) facilities managed by Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc. (FDH) and operated by Lockheed Martin Hanford Company (LMHC). This review will also ascertain whether within RPP facilities and operations the work planning and execution processes are in place and functioning to effectively protect the health and safety of the workers, public, environment, and federal property over the RPP life cycle. The RPP ISMS should support the Hanford Strategic Plan (DOERL-96-92) to safely clean up and manage the site's legacy waste and deploy science and technology while incorporating the ISMS central theme to ''Do work safely'' and protect human health and the environment.

SHOOP, D.S.

1999-09-10T23:59:59.000Z

160

Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds This Environmental Protection Agency report contains recommendations for a series of environmental actions, including those to increase environmental and economically beneficial landscaping practices at Federal facilities and federally funded projects. Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds More Documents & Publications Pollution Prevention - Environmental Impact Reduction Checklists for NEPA/309 Reviewers Memorandum to Heads of Federal Departments and Agencies Regarding Pollution Prevention and the National Environmental Policy Act EIS-0488: EPA Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds This Environmental Protection Agency report contains recommendations for a series of environmental actions, including those to increase environmental and economically beneficial landscaping practices at Federal facilities and federally funded projects. Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds More Documents & Publications Pollution Prevention - Environmental Impact Reduction Checklists for NEPA/309 Reviewers Memorandum to Heads of Federal Departments and Agencies Regarding Pollution Prevention and the National Environmental Policy Act Executive Order 13148-Greening the Government Through Leadership in

162

Independent Oversight Targeted Review of the Safety Significant Blast Door and Personnel Door Interlock Systems and Review of Federal Assurance Capability at the Pantex Plant, December 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Targeted Review of the Targeted Review of the Safety Significant Blast Door and Personnel Door Interlock Systems and Review of Federal Assurance Capability at the Pantex Plant December 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Scope.................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background........................................................................................................................................... 2

163

SRS Waste Solidification Building Project Peer Review, July 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SRS-2011-07-15 SRS-2011-07-15 Site: Savannah River Site, NA-26 Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Waste Solidification Building Project Peer Review Dates of Activity : 07/12/2011 - 07/15/2011 Report Preparer: James Lockridge Activity Description/Purpose: At the request of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Office of Enterprise Project Management (NA- APM-20), the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), provided an expert to review the Waste Solidification Building (WSB) startup programs and procedures associated with worker safety and health, environment, and security. Criteria for the review was detailed in the Criteria,

164

DOE Issues Environmental Assessment on Road Project for Public Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Brad Bugger (208) 526-0833 DOE Issues Environmental Assessment on Road Project for Public Review Brad Bugger (208) 526-0833 DOE Issues Environmental Assessment on Road Project for Public Review The U.S. Department of Energy has issued for public review and comment a draft environmental assessment of the potential environmental impacts of building an internal road to safely ship radioactive material within the Idaho National Laboratory. DOE�s preferred alternative under the environmental assessment is to develop a new, internal road that would connect the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center with the Materials and Fuels Complex, a distance of about 20 miles. It would allow the INL to safely ship nuclear materials from the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center and the Materials and Fuels Complex without having to utilize public roads, like Highway 20, which adds additional cost and security considerations to each shipment.

165

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Request for Information seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal authorizations. This notice announces an extension of the public comment period for submitting comments regarding the IIP Process to October 31, 2013. Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting

166

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Request for Information seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal authorizations. This notice announces an extension of the public comment period for submitting comments regarding the IIP Process to October 31, 2013. Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting

167

DOE/EA-1635: Environmental Assessment for Pre-approval Review Williston to Tioga Transmission Line Project (March 2010)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Assessment for Pre-approval Review DOE/EA - 1635 Williston to Tioga Transmission Line Project Environmental Assessment for Pre-approval Review DOE/EA - 1635 Williston to Tioga Transmission Line Project Environmental Assessment for Pre-approval Review DOE/EA - 1635 March 2010 Acronyms and Abbreviations °C degrees Celsius AAQS Ambient Air Quality Standards AIRFA American Indian Religious Freedom Act of 1978 amsl above mean sea level APLIC Avian Power Line Interaction Committee BEPC Basin Electric Power Cooperative BFE Base Flood Elevation BGEPA Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act BMP best management practice CFR Code of Federal Regulations CO 2 carbon dioxide Council Advisory Council on Historic Preservation CRP Conservation Reserve Program

168

Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) Implementation Project. Summary: The FISMA Implementation Project ...

2013-01-15T23:59:59.000Z

169

1990 DOE/SANDIA crystalline photovoltaic technology project review meeting  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document serves as the proceedings for the annual project review meeting held by Sandia's Photovoltaic Cell Research Division and Photovoltaic Technology Division. It contains information supplied by each organization making a presentation at the meeting, which was held August 7 through 9, 1990 at the Sheraton Hotel in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Sessions were held to discuss national photovoltaic programs, one-sun crystalline silicon cell research, concentrator silicon cell research, concentrator 3-5 cell research, and concentrating collector development.

Ruby, D.S. (ed.)

1990-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

170

DOE Selects Projects for up to $50 Million of Federal Funding...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to increase efficiency in the nation's electricity grid. The Renewable and Distributed Systems Integration (RDSI) technologies demonstrated in these projects aim to reduce peak...

171

EM Capital and Major Operating Project Standard Review Plan Edition Two  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This memorandum introduces the Second Edition of the Capital and Major Operations Projects Standard Review Plan (SRP).

172

Review of the Hanford Sludge Treatment Project, February 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

HSS Independent Activity Report - Rev. 0 Report Number: HIAR-RL-2012-02-27 Site: DOE-Richland Operations Office Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Sludge Treatment Project Dates of Activity : 02/27/2012 - 03/01/2012 Report Preparer: Jake Wechselberger Activity Description/Purpose: The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed operational awareness reviews of the Sludge Treatment Project (STP), Engineered Container Retrieval and Transfer System (ECRTS) during site visits. Result: During the period February 27 - March 1, 2012, an HSS representative attended the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

173

Review of the Hanford Sludge Treatment Project, February 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

HSS Independent Activity Report - Rev. 0 Report Number: HIAR-RL-2012-02-27 Site: DOE-Richland Operations Office Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Sludge Treatment Project Dates of Activity : 02/27/2012 - 03/01/2012 Report Preparer: Jake Wechselberger Activity Description/Purpose: The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed operational awareness reviews of the Sludge Treatment Project (STP), Engineered Container Retrieval and Transfer System (ECRTS) during site visits. Result: During the period February 27 - March 1, 2012, an HSS representative attended the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

174

Projects from Federal Region IX: Department of Energy Appropriate Energy Technology Program. Part II  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Details and progress of appropriate energy technology programs in Region IX are presented. In Arizona, the projects are Solar Hot Water for the Prescott Adult Center and Solar Prototype House for a Residential Community. In California, the projects are Solar AquaDome Demonstration Project; Solar Powered Liquid Circulating Pump; Appropriate Energy Technology Resource Center; Digester for Wastewater Grown Aquatic Plants; Performance Characteristics of an Anaerobic Wastewater Lagoon Primary Treatment System; Appropriate Energy/Energy Conservation Demonstration Project; Solar Energy for Composting Toilets; Dry Creek Rancheria Solar Demonstration Projects; Demonstration for Energy Retrofit Analysis and Implementation; and Active Solar Space Heating System for the Integral Urban House. In Hawaii, the projects are: Java Plum Electric; Low-Cost Pond Digesters for Hawaiian Pig Farm Energy Needs; Solar Beeswax Melter; Methane Gas Plant for Operating Boilers and Generating Steam; and Solar Water Heating in Sugarcane Seed-Treatment Plants. A Wind-Powered Lighted Navigation Buoys Project for Guam is also described. A revised description of the Biogas Energy for Hawaiian Small Farms and Homesteads is given in an appendix.

Case, C.W.; Clark, H.R.; Kay, J.; Lucarelli, F.B.; Rizer, S.

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

175

Columbia River System Operation Review on Selecting an Operating Strategy for the Federal Columbia River Power System; 21Feb1997  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Bonneville Power Administration Columbia River System Operation Review on Selecting an Operating Strategy for the Federal Columbia River Power System (FCRPS) AGENCY: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), Department of Energy (DOE) ACTION: Record of Decision (ROD) SUMMARY: The Columbia River System Operation Review (SOR) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) assessed operations at the 14 Federal dams and reservoirs on the Columbia and lower Snake Rivers that have a major influence on the multiple purpose system operation, and for which power production is coordinated under the Pacific Northwest Coordination Agreement. Lead agencies for this six-year process were the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation

176

Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Information on Improving Performance of Federal Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 168 - August 29, 2013 Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 168 - August 29, 2013 The Department of Energy's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, in collaboration with the Member Agencies of the Steering Committee (Member Agencies) created under Executive Order 13604 of March 22, 2012, and pursuant to the June 7, 2013 Transmission Presidential Memorandum, is seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal Authorization(s).

177

Federal assistance program. Geothermal technology transfer. Project status report, May 1986  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Progress for the month of May, 1986, is described. Projects include evaluation of direct heating of greenhouses and other businesses, technology transfer to consultants, developers and users, and program monitor activities. (ACR)

Lienau, P.J.; Culver, G.

1986-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

178

DOE Selects Projects for up to $50 Million of Federal Funding...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

in these projects aim to reduce peak load electricity demand by at least 15 percent at distribution feeders-the power lines delivering electricity to consumers-and are part of...

179

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09 09 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 99 / Thursday, May 22, 1997 / Notices collection on the respondents, including through the use of information technology. Dated: May 16, 1997. Gloria Parker, Director, Information Resources Management Group. Office of Management Type of Review: New. Title: Department of Education Federal Cash Award Certification Statement and Department of Education Federal Cash Quarterly Confirmation Statement. Frequency: Annually. Affected Public: Business or other for- profit; Not for Profit institutions; Federal Government; State, Local or Tribal Government, SEAs or LEAs. Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour Burden: Responses: 12,000. Burden Hours: 38,160. Abstract: The collection of the Federal Cash Award Statement is necessary for the Agency to monitor cash advanced to

180

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

STATES OF AMERICA STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Reedsport OPT Wave Park, LLC Project No. 12713-002 Oregon NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (December 3, 2010) In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission or FERC's) regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed Reedsport OPT Wave Park, LLC's application for license for the Reedsport OPT Wave Park Project

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

A Review of Wind Project Financing Structures in the USA  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

capital to finance wind project costs. Roughly $28 billion (to fund all of the project costs and sufficient tax appetitefunds 100% of the project costs as equity in the project

Bolinger, Mark A

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

182

An evaluation of technical review of federal laboratory research: Findings from a US Department of Energy technical review pilot  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Recommendations for improving the process for expert panel reviews of technical and programmatic aspects of science and technology programs are provided based on an evaluation study of pilot reviews for two programs at Sandia National Laboratories. These reviews were part of a larger Technical Review Pilot for the US Department of Energy (DOE). Both the Sandia Pulse Power program and Solar Thermal Electric program (a virtual lab with NREL) reviews used the recommended four DOE review criteria, but motivation for the review and the review process differed. These differences provide insight into recommendations for ways to improve the review of DOE`s multifaceted technical programs. Recommendations are: (1) Review when the program has specific need for information or validation. There is no one size fits all correct time or reason to review technical programs. (2) Tailor the four DOE criteria to the program and its need for information and explain them to the Review Panel. (3) Pay attention to the review process. Spend more time in preparation and pre-review and on briefings on the review outcomes. (4) Evaluate reviews to determine how to do them better. The survey instrument is provided for those who wish to modify it for their own use.

Jordan, G.; Kuswa, G.; Mortensen, J.

1998-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

183

Managing Constructibility Reviews to Reduce Highway Project Durations  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

- creases costs. Research confirms that schedule compression has led to increases in project cost CII 1989 in project cost provided certain tech- niques are applied during project development and especially dur- ing to have the highest potential to reduce project duration without increasing total project cost. Project

Ford, David N.

184

Projected Benefits of Federal Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Programs: FY 2004 Budget Request  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) leads the Federal Government's efforts to provide reliable, affordable, and environmentally sound energy for America, through its research, development, and deployment (RD&D) programs. EERE invests in high-risk, high-value research and development (R&D) that, conducted in partnership with the private sector and other government agencies, accelerates the development and facilitates the deployment of advanced clean energy technologies and practices. The RD&D activities of EERE are designed to improve the nation's readiness to address future energy needs. This document summarizes the results of the benefits analysis of EERE's programs, as described in the FY 2004 Budget Request. EERE is adopting a benefits framework developed by the National Research Council (NRC) to represent the various types of benefits resulting from the energy efficiency technology improvements and renewable energy technology development prompted by EERE programs. Specifically, EERE's benefits analysis focuses on three main categories of energy-linked benefits-economic, environmental, and security. These measures are not a complete representation of the benefits or market roles of efficiency and renewable technologies, but provide an indication of the range of benefits provided.

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

2004-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

185

1992 DOE/Sandia crystalline photovoltaic technology project review meeting  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document serves as the proceedings for the annual project review meeting held by Sandia National Laboratories` Photovoltaic Technology and Photovoltaic Evaluation Departments. It contains information supplied by organizations making presentations at the meeting, which was held July 14--15, 1992 at the Sheraton Old Town Hotel in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Overview sessions covered the Department of Energy (DOE) program, including those at Sandia and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), and non-DOE programs, including the EPRI concentrator collector program, The Japanese crystalline silicon program, and some concentrating photovoltaic activities in Europe. Additional sessions included papers on Sandia`s Photovoltaic Device Fabrication Laboratory`s collaborative research, cell processing research, the activities of the participants in the Concentrator Initiative Program, and photovoltaic technology evaluation at Sandia and NREL.

Maish, A. [ed.

1992-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

186

Review of PV Inverter Technology Cost and Performance Projections  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) has a major responsibility in the implementation of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Solar Energy Technologies Program. Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) has a major role in supporting inverter development, characterization, standards, certifications, and verifications. The Solar Energy Technologies Program recently published a Multiyear Technical Plan, which establishes a goal of reducing the Levelized Energy Cost (LEC) for photovoltaic (PV) systems to $0.06/kWh by 2020. The Multiyear Technical Plan estimates that, in order to meet the PV system goal, PV inverter prices will need to decline to $0.25-0.30 Wp by 2020. DOE determined the need to conduct a rigorous review of the PV Program's technical and economic targets, including the target set for PV inverters. NREL requested that Navigant Consulting Inc.(NCI) conduct a review of historical and projected cost and performance improvements for PV inverters, including identification of critical barriers identified and the approaches government might use to address them.

Navigant Consulting Inc.

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

187

Review of PV Inverter Technology Cost and Performance Projections  

SciTech Connect

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) has a major responsibility in the implementation of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Solar Energy Technologies Program. Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) has a major role in supporting inverter development, characterization, standards, certifications, and verifications. The Solar Energy Technologies Program recently published a Multiyear Technical Plan, which establishes a goal of reducing the Levelized Energy Cost (LEC) for photovoltaic (PV) systems to $0.06/kWh by 2020. The Multiyear Technical Plan estimates that, in order to meet the PV system goal, PV inverter prices will need to decline to $0.25-0.30 Wp by 2020. DOE determined the need to conduct a rigorous review of the PV Program's technical and economic targets, including the target set for PV inverters. NREL requested that Navigant Consulting Inc.(NCI) conduct a review of historical and projected cost and performance improvements for PV inverters, including identification of critical barriers identified and the approaches government might use to address them.

Navigant Consulting Inc.

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

188

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Energy and Federal Energy and Water Management Awards to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management Awards on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management Awards on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management Awards on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management Awards on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management Awards on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management Awards on AddThis.com... Project Assistance Training Outreach Awards for Saving Energy Federal Energy and Water Management Better Buildings Federal Award

189

Memo Issuance of EM Capital and Major Operating Project Standard Review Plan Edition Two  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MAR 2 4 201011 MAR 2 4 201011 MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION FROM: DR. STEVEN L. KRAHN DEPUTY ASSISTANT SAFETY AND SECU EIVVIROIVMENTAL MANAGEMENT SUBJECT: Issuance of Environmental Management Capital and Major Operating Project Standard Review Plan Edition Two The Office of Environmental Management (EM) is responsible for managing the design, construction, operation, and eventual disposition of mission critical projects/facilities. Effective management of these projects requires multiple disciplines to be integrated and engaged at various project lifecycle phases. These disciplines include project management, engineering, design, safety, environment, safeguards and security, and quality assurance. The lessons-learned to date from ongoing Headquarters (HQ) and Field project reviews [e.g., Construction Project

190

Status Review of Wildlife Mitigation, Columbia Basin Hydroelectric Projects, Washington Facilities (Intrastate) Final Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report was prepared for BPA in fulfillment of section 1004 (b)(1) of the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act of 1980, to review the status of past, present, and proposed future wildlife planning and mitigation program at existing hydroelectric projects in the Columbia River Basin. The project evaluations will form the basis for determining any needed remedial measures or additional project analysis. Projects addressed are: Merwin Dam; Swift Project; Yale Project; Cowlitz River; Boundary Dam; Box Canyon Dam; Lake Chelan; Condit Project; Enloe Project; Spokane River; Tumwater and Dryden Dam; Yakima; and Naches Project.

Howerton, Jack

1984-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

191

MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT March!April2005  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

March!April2005 March!April2005 Report Period: March 1 - April30, 2005 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS Semi-annual ground water and surface water samples were collected during the week of April4, in accordance with the Monticello Mill Tailings Site Operational Unit III Post- Record of Decision Monitoring Plan. DOE initiated biomonitoring at the wetland areas on the former millsite and down-gradient at the sediment pond as required by the Record of Decision for the Monticello Mill Tailings (USDOE) Site Operable Unit Ill, Swface and Ground Water, Monticello, Utah (May 2004). MRAP DOE submitted the final 2004 Annual Inspection of the Monticello Mill Tailings (USDOE) and Monticello Radioactively Contaminated Properties Sites to the Environmental Protection

192

Review of the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Project...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Bechtel National, Inc. CAQ Condition Adverse to Quality CFR Code of Federal Regulations DOE U.S. Department of Energy FBE Fusion Bonded Epoxy HSS Office of Health, Safety and...

193

A Review of Uncertainties in Global Temperature Projections over the Twenty-First Century  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Quantification of the uncertainties in future climate projections is crucial for the implementation of climate policies. Here a review of projections of global temperature change over the twenty-first century is provided for the six illustrative ...

R. Knutti; M. R. Allen; P. Friedlingstein; J. M. Gregory; G. C. Hegerl; G. A. Meehl; M. Meinshausen; J. M. Murphy; G.-K. Plattner; S. C. B. Raper; T. F. Stocker; P. A. Stott; H. Teng; T. M. L. Wigley

2008-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

194

Revealing the Hidden Value that the Federal Investment Tax Credit and Treasury Cash Grant Provide To Community Wind Projects  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and Clean Renewable Energy Bonds Although the PTC and accelerated tax depreciation have historically been the primary federal incentives

Bolinger, Mark A.

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

195

SC Projects | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Projects Projects Project Assessment (OPA) OPA Home About Project Management SC Projects Review Dates (updated November 2013) Project Construction Photos Other Links SC Federal Project Directors (FPD) and FPD Resources Contact Information Project Assessment U.S. Department of Energy SC-28/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4840 F: (301) 903-8520 E: sc.opa@science.doe.gov SC Projects Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page SC Projects-Contains information regarding SC projects including project review dates, information on Office of Science Certified Federal Project Directors and Defining the Leadership Traits/Skill Set for a Successful Federal Project Director, and project photos or links to project photo sites. Last modified: 3/18/2013 10:54:36

196

Non-personnel OMB A-21 Exceptions Direct Charging to Federal Projects Direct charging costs to federal grants which are typically considered F&A may be  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

are met. These conditions include: 1. items are required by the projects scope of work 2. costs can be specifically and easily identified to this project 3. the number and/or cost of the items needed is clearly use on a project, charges may be allowable as direct costs if appropriately justified. Office supplies

Hall, Daniel

197

Federal assistance program. Quarterly project progress report, January 1998--March 1998  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes geothermal technical assistance, R&D and technology transfer activities of the Geo-Heat Center at Oregon Institute of Technology for the second quarter of FY-98-98 (January-March, 1998). It describes 268 contacts with parties during this period related to technical assistance with geothermal direct heat projects. Areas dealt with include requests for general information including maps and material for high school debates, and material on geothermal heat pumps, resource and well data, spacing heating and cooling, greenhouses, aquaculture, equipment, district heating, resorts and spas, industrial applications, electric power and snow melting. Research activities include work on model construction specifications for line shaft submersible pumps and plate heat exchangers and a comprehensive aquaculture developer package. The revised Geothermal Direct Use Engineering and Design Guidebooks was completed, published and is available for distribution. Outreach activities include the publication of the Quarterly Bulletin (Vol. 19, No. 1) which was devoted entirely to geothermal equipment, dissemination of information mainly through mailings of publications, tours of local geothermal uses, geothermal library acquisitions and use, participation in workshops, short courses and technical meetings by the staff, and progress monitor reports on geothermal activities.

NONE

1998-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

198

Sensors and Controls Program and Project Review: May 21-22, 2013 ...  

... Energy Innovation Portal on Facebook; Tweet about Sensors and Controls Program and Project Review: May 21-22, 2013 - Energy Innovation Portal on Twitter ...

199

Federal Energy Management Program technical assistance case study: The Forrestal Building relighting project saves $400K annually  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy (DOE) believes energy efficiency begins at home -- in this case the James A. Forrestal Building in Washington, D.C. Since 1969, the 1.7 million-square-foot Forrestal Building has served as DOE Headquarters. In 1989, a team of in-house energy specialists began searching for opportunities to make the Forrestal Building more energy efficient. The team, on which personnel from the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) served, identified lighting as an area in which energy use could be reduced substantially. A monitoring program showed that the building`s more than 34,000 1-foot by 4-foot fluorescent lighting fixtures were responsible for 33% of the building`s total annual electric energy use, which represents more than 9 million kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year. In initiating the relighting program, DOE hoped to achieve these broad goals: Reduce energy use and utility bills, and improve lighting quality by distributing the light more uniformly. Funding was also an important consideration. DOE sought financing alternatives through which the lighting retrofit is paid for without using government-appropriated capital funds. DOE cut lighting costs more than 50% and paid for the project with the money saved on energy bills.

1997-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

200

Status Review of Wildlife Mitigation, Columbia Basin Hydroelectric Projects, Columbia River Mainstem Facilities, 1984 Final Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report reviews the status of past, present, and proposed future wildlife planning and mitigation programs at existing hydroelectric projects in the Columbia River Basin. The project evaluations will form the basis for determining any needed remedial measures or additional project analysis. Each hydropower facility report is abstracted separately for inclusion in the Energy Data Base.

Howerton, Jack; Hwang, Diana

1984-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Understanding broadcast based peer review on open source software projects  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Software peer review has proven to be a successful technique in open source software (OSS) development. In contrast to industry, where reviews are typically assigned to specific individuals, changes are broadcast to hundreds of potentially interested ... Keywords: case studies, grounded theory, open source software, peer review

Peter C. Rigby; Margaret-Anne Storey

2011-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

202

A Review of Wind Project Financing Structures in the USA  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Mark Bolinger. 2007. Wind Project Financing Structures: A2008. Annual Report on U.S. Wind Power Installation, Cost,James. 2005. Invenergy Wind Finance Company Portfolio

Bolinger, Mark A

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

203

Energy Research Project, Review (Minnesota) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

identify, monitor, and evaluate research studies and demonstration projects pertaining to alternative energy and energy conservation systems and methodologies, including: (1) solar...

204

Review of the Hanford Sludge Treatment Project, February 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Sludge Treatment Project Dates of Activity : 02272012 - 03012012 Report Preparer: Jake...

205

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Wholesale Electricity Market Design Project...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Wholesale Electricity Market Design Project September 28, 2012 Jim Ellison, Verne Loose, Ray Byrne,...

206

UMATILLA PROJECTS REVIEW A presentation of the multiple-component  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

........................................................................................................ 9 1. Instream Flow Enhancement. ISRP's Concerns Regarding Flow and Passage Projects between flow, passage, habitat, hatchery and Research, Monitoring and Evaluation (RM&E) biological

207

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

893 893 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 158 / Friday, August 15, 2003 / Notices Title: Comprehensive Program Annual Performance Report. Frequency: One time. Affected Public: Not-for-profit institutions. Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour Burden: Responses: 140. Burden Hours: 2,800. Abstract: The Comprehensive Program is a discretionary grant program that makes competitive awards to support reform and innovations through projects that improve educational practice at the postsecondary level. Grantees annually submit a performance report to demonstrate that substantial progress is being made toward meeting the objectives of their projects. Reporting requirements are currently based on broad criteria from the Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR). This request is to

208

A case analysis of energy savings performance contract projects and photovoltaic energy at Fort Bliss, El Paso, Texas .  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

??The purpose of this MBA Project is to review existing policy of the Federal Energy Management Program under the purview of National Renewal Energy Laboratory (more)

Harley, Antonio B.

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

209

Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Savings Performance Contracts  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Contracts Contracts Getting Started Federal agencies new to the ESPC process should review the ESPC Overview, the FEMP Assistance Guide, and the FAQs. Case studies are also available. When you are ready to get started, contact a FEMP financing specialist. Energy savings performance contracts (ESPCs) allow Federal agencies to complete energy-savings projects without up-front capital costs and special Congressional appropriations. An ESPC is a partnership between a Federal agency and an energy service company (ESCO). The ESCO conducts a comprehensive energy audit of Federal facilities and identifies improvements to save energy. In consultation with the Federal agency, the ESCO designs and constructs a project that meets the agency's needs and arranges the necessary funding. The ESCO guarantees that the improvements will generate energy cost savings to pay for the project over the term of the contract (up to 25 years). After the contract ends, all additional cost savings accrue to the agency.

210

Review of the Regional Biomass Energy Program: Technical projects  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This article summarizes technical projects of the regional Biomass Energy Program. Projects included are as follows: economic impact studies for renewable energy resources; alternative liquid fuels; Wood pellets fuels forum; residential fuel wood consumption; waste to energy decision-makers guide; fuel assessment for cogeneration facilities; municipal solid waste combustion characteristics.

Lusk, P.

1994-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

211

Legal factors affecting the financing of small scale hydroelectric projects  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

An introduction to the major business organizational options open to small-scale hydroelectric (SSH) projects is given. The major federal income tax treatments of these options are compared. Significant general federal income tax factors affecting SSH projects are reintroduced and explained. Some of the special federal income tax problem areas in SSH development are isolated. Tax benefit flow through or transfer mechanisms are discussed. Tax exempt financing opportunities for private SSH projects are reviewed. (MHR)

Wilson, W.H.; Ringo, M.J.; Forgione, N.

1983-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

212

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partnership Working Group The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) establishes partnerships and facilitates communications among Federal agencies, utilities, and energy service companies. The group develops strategies to implement cost-effective energy efficiency and water conservation projects through utility incentive programs at Federal sites. The mission and objectives of the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group are to: Enhance existing or foster new partnerships between Federal agencies and their servicing utilities to identify, develop, and implement cost-effective energy efficiency, water conservation, and renewable energy projects at Federal sites Identify how utilities can help Federal agencies meet energy management goals required by legislation

213

Review and Selection of Research Projects | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Review and Selection of Research Projects Review and Selection of Research Projects High Energy Physics (HEP) HEP Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of HEP Funding Opportunities Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Merit / Review Policies Early Career Research Opportunities in High Energy Physics Graduate Fellows in High Energy Theory Guidelines Advisory Committees News & Resources Contact Information High Energy Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-25/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3624 F: (301) 903-2597 E: sc.hep@science.doe.gov More Information » Peer Merit / Review Policies Review and Selection of Research Projects Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page All research projects supported by the Office of High Energy Physics (HEP)

214

Federal Budgeting Process | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Budgeting Process Federal Budgeting Process Federal Budgeting Process September 11, 2013 8:30AM EDT to September 12, 2013 4:00PM EDT Registration link: CHRIS (000412/0031) $400.00 Course type: Classroom Course Location: DOE Headquarters, Forrestal Building, Washington, DC / WCF-GH-043 Course Description: This course is designed for experienced program and project managers to acquire a working knowledge of DOE's financial and managerial systems to accomplish the Department's budgeting and accounting processes. Processes include preparing, reviewing, presenting, and defending budget submissions. Foundation skills are taught in this course that are required to manage a DOE project through its financial life cycle, including managing the flow of funds to programs and projects, validating

215

A Review of the Sierra Cooperative Pilot Project  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Sierra Cooperative Pilot Project (SCPP) is an investigation of cloud seeding as a means of increasing winter precipitation on the Sierra Nevada. It is a concerted effort in the development of a physically sound cloud-seeding technology. It ...

David W. Reynolds; Arnett S. Dennis

1986-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

216

2012 SG Peer Review - Integrated Smart Distribution RD&D Project...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2012 Smart Grid R&D Program Peer Review Meeting DOE - Integrated Smart Distribution RD&D Project S. S. (Mani) Venkata Alstom Grid June 7, 2012 December 2008 DOE Integrated Smart...

217

DSW Power Projects  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Power Projects Contact DSW Customers Customer Meetings Environmental Review-NEPA Operations & Maintenance Planning & Projects Power Marketing Power Projects Contact DSW Customers Customer Meetings Environmental Review-NEPA Operations & Maintenance Planning & Projects Power Marketing Rates DSW Power Projects Boulder Canyon: Straddling the Colorado River near the Arizona-Nevada border, Hoover Dam in Boulder Canyon creates Lake Mead. River waters turning turbines at Hoover Powerplant produce about 2,074 MW--enough electricity for nearly 8 million people. Western markets this power to public utilities in Arizona, California and Nevada over 53.30 circuit-miles of transmission line. Central Arizona: Authorized in 1968, the Central Arizona Project in Arizona and western New Mexico was built to improve water resources in the Colorado River Basin. Segments of the authorization allowed for Federal participation in the Navajo Generating Station. The Federal share of the powerplant's combined capacity is 547 MW.

218

Review of BPA Funded Sturgeon, Resident Fish and Wildlife Projects for 1990/1991.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) held a public meeting on November 19--21, 1991, for the purpose of review, coordination, and consultation of the BPA-funded projects for sturgeon, resident fish, and wildlife in the Columbia River Basin (Basin). The comments received after the meeting were favorable and the participants agreed that the meeting was stimulating and productive. The information exchanged should lead to better coordination with other projects throughout the Basin. This document list the projects by title, the project leaders and BPA's project officers, and an abstract of each leader's presentation.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1990-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

219

This Guide is designed to provide assistance to the community regarding the direct charging of costs to sponsored projects while maintaining compliance with the Federal cost principles (2 CFR Part 220, OMB  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

charging of costs to sponsored projects while maintaining compliance with the Federal cost principles (2. Typical costs charged directly to a sponsored project include: 1. compensation of employees incurred for the sponsored project. Costs of materials from stock/services rendered by specialized

220

CEQ Releases Two Handbooks on Improving Efficiency of Federal Environmental  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CEQ Releases Two Handbooks on Improving Efficiency of Federal CEQ Releases Two Handbooks on Improving Efficiency of Federal Environmental Reviews CEQ Releases Two Handbooks on Improving Efficiency of Federal Environmental Reviews March 5, 2013 - 4:43pm Addthis The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) today released two new handbooks that encourage more efficient environmental reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The first handbook, created by CEQ and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), provides advice to Federal agencies, applicants, project sponsors, and consultants on how to take advantage of existing regulatory provisions to align the NEPA process and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Section 106 review process. The handbook explains how to align NEPA and NHPA Section 106 processes for maximum efficiency and

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

CEQ Releases Two Handbooks on Improving Efficiency of Federal Environmental  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CEQ Releases Two Handbooks on Improving Efficiency of Federal CEQ Releases Two Handbooks on Improving Efficiency of Federal Environmental Reviews CEQ Releases Two Handbooks on Improving Efficiency of Federal Environmental Reviews March 5, 2013 - 4:43pm Addthis The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) today released two new handbooks that encourage more efficient environmental reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The first handbook, created by CEQ and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), provides advice to Federal agencies, applicants, project sponsors, and consultants on how to take advantage of existing regulatory provisions to align the NEPA process and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Section 106 review process. The handbook explains how to align NEPA and NHPA Section 106 processes for maximum efficiency and

222

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

66 66 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 142 / Friday, July 24, 1998 / Notices Dated: July 16, 1998. Richard D. Wilson, Acting Assistant Administrator. [FR Doc. 98-19832 Filed 7-23-98; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ER-FRL-5494-1] Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments Availability of EPA comments prepared July 6, 1998 Through July 10, 1998 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities AT (202) 564-5076. An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published

223

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09 09 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 93 / Friday, May 14, 1999 / Notices technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 3.03 hours per response. It is estimated that any individual may respond to synopses or market research questions 5 times per year. EPA anticipates publicizing approximately 260 contract actions per year, and conducting 3790 market research inquiries. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review

224

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

32 32 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 15, 1999 / Notices that the original selection list would remain in effect. The complainant requested review of the SLA's stipulated decision by a Federal arbitration panel. The panel was convened on April 17, 1998. Arbitration Panel Decision The issue before the arbitration panel was whether the SLA's stipulated decision to make a determination concerning the continuation of the special assignment process at the time a military base became available was inconsistent with the ALJ's determination. The arbitration panel ruled that, at the time a military base contract became available, there may be a compelling reason that would benefit both the program and the complainant that would justify not assigning complainant

225

Federal Wind Energy Research Program  

SciTech Connect

The Office of Program Analysis (OPA) undertook an assessment of 55 research projects sponsored by the Federal Wind Energy Research Program. This report summarizes the results of that review. In accordance with statue and policy guidance, the program's research has targeted the sciences of wind turbine dynamics and the development of advanced components and systems. Wind turbine research has focused on atmospheric fluid dynamics, aerodynamics, and structural dynamics. Rating factors including project scientific and technical merit, appropriateness and level of innovation of the technical approach, quality of the project team, productivity, and probable impact on the program's mission. Each project was also given an overall evaluation supported with written comments. 1 fig.

1991-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

226

Summary for the Next Generation Nuclear Plant Project in Review  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper reports on the major progress that the NGNP Project has made toward developing and commercializing the HTGR technology. Significant R&D progress has been made in addressing key technical issues for qualification of the HTGR fuel and graphite, codification of high temperature materials and verification and validation of design codes. Work is also progressing in heat transfer/transport design and testing and in development of the high temperature steam electrolysis hydrogen production process. A viable licensing strategy has been formulated in coordination with the NRC and DOE. White papers covering key licensing issues have been and will continue to be submitted and necessary discussions of these key issues have begun with the NRC. Continued government support is needed to complete the Project objectives as established in the 2005 Energy Policy Act.

L.E. Demick

2010-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

227

Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Savings Performance Contract  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Training Training The Federal Energy Management Program offers training to help Federal agencies implement energy savings performance contracts (ESPCs). Introduction to Alternative Financing for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy: Covers the use of project funding tools to plan and implement energy and water saving measures and renewable energy systems in Federal facilities. Recorded June 29, 2010. Introduction to Energy Savings Performance Contracts: Outlines how ESPCs can help Federal agencies implement renewable energy, energy efficiency, and water efficiency projects. Recorded June 30, 2010. Financing and Pricing Evaluation for Energy Savings Performance Contracts: Offers a brief overview of costs and pricing review of the ESPC final proposal and how ESPCs can fund the reduction of Federal facility energy use and costs. Recorded July 7, 2010.

228

Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act Technical Assistance...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Projects to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act Technical Assistance Projects on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program:...

229

Data Review of the Hot Dry Rock Project at Fenton Hill, New Mexico  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report reviews the data collected during the hot dry rock experimental project conducted by the US Department of Energy and Los Alamos National Laboratory at Fenton Hill, New Mexico from about 1971 through 1995. Five main categories of data were reviewed: (1) geologic data; (2) flow test data; (3) reservoir modeling data; (4) chemical tracer data; and (5) seismic data. The review determines the important data sets from the project, determines where and how these data are stored, and evaluates whether further analyses of the data might be likely to yield additional information valuable to the geothermal industry or to the further development of enhanced geothermal systems.

GeothermEx, Inc.

1998-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

230

A Review of the NGNP Project: February 2006 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A Review of the NGNP Project: February 2006 A Review of the NGNP Project: February 2006 A Review of the NGNP Project: February 2006 In 2002, the Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy completed a technology roadmap project that provided an overall plan to the broad vision of enhancing the future role of nuclear energy systems in the United States and the world at large. This Technology Roadmap focused on the development of advanced nuclear systems, so-called Generation IV systems, which meet profram foals of improved safety and economics, as well as enhanced sustainability and minimization of the risks from proliferation. This Gen-IV Technology Roadmap defined the lead reactor concepts and their associated fuel cycles to be pursued, as well as the R&D plan to develop the base technology for these reactor concepts and their complete fuel

231

Federal Stewardship | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Federal Stewardship Federal Stewardship Ames Site Office (AMSO) AMSO Home About Organization Chart .pdf file (113KB) Federal Stewardship Internal Site Office Operations Jobs Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Ames Site Office U.S. Department of Energy 9800 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 P: (630) 252-6167 F: (630) 252-2855 About Federal Stewardship Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Federal Stewardship maintains and protects Federal assets at the Ames Laboratory or assigned to the Ames Site Office. Objectives Reviews and assesses Ames Laboratory and support activities and stewardship needs against the contract requirements and takes action, as necessary. Develops and maintains an effective working relationship and communication

232

RD&I meeting Review DOE Projects  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1-23, 2012 1-23, 2012 2 © SIGMA 3 Integrated Reservoir Solutions, Inc. All Rights Reserved. OUTLINE * Benefits to the program * Project Overview - Goals and Objectives - Purpose/POC - Stratagem * Technical Status - Reservoir Definition/model - Reservoir simulator - Challenges * Summary - Key Findings/Conclusion - Future Plans * Accomplishments * Appendix © SIGMA 3 Integrated Reservoir Solutions, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 3 © SIGMA 3 Integrated Reservoir Solutions, Inc. All Rights Reserved. BENEFITS TO THE PROGRAM * Simulation and Risk Assessment :Technologies that will support industries ability to predict CO 2 storage capacity in geologic formation to within ± 30% By: * Demonstrating field scale feasibility of using ED/RSM techniques to optimize engineering

233

EIA-Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review-Evaluation of Projections in  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006)* Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006)* The Energy Information Administration (EIA) produces projections of energy supply and demand each year in the Annual Energy Outlook (AEO). The projections in the AEO are not statements of what will happen but of what might happen, given the assumptions and methodologies used. The projections are business-as-usual trend projections, given known technology, technological and demographic trends, and current laws and regulations. The potential impacts of pending or proposed legislation, regulations, and standards-or of sections of legislation that have been enacted but that require implementing regulations or appropriation of funds that are not provided or specified in the legislation itself-are not reflected in the projections, although there are a few exceptions. It is assumed that current laws and regulations that have sunset dates, but which are regularly renewed, are extended for modeling purposes. Thus, the AEO generally provides a policy-neutral reference case that can be used to analyze policy initiatives. While the analyses in the AEO focus primarily on a reference case, lower and higher economic growth cases, and lower and higher energy price cases; more than 30 alternative cases are generally included in the AEO. Readers are encouraged to review the full range of cases, which address many of the uncertainties inherent in long-term projections.

234

NREL: Technology Deployment - Other Federal Agency Support  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Other Federal Agency Support Other Federal Agency Support Photo of a man and a woman standing behind a ground-mounted solar panel installation. Merry Edwards Winery in California is almost 100% solar powered and just one example of the more than 77,511 project applications reviewed by NREL prior to receiving funding through the U.S. Department of Treasury Recovery Act Section 1603 Treasury Grant Program. Courtesy of Ben Miller, Merry Edwards Winery Through work-for-others agreements, NREL supports other federal agencies in finding ways to meet energy savings goals through energy assessments, analysis, project guidance, and other activities. General Services Administration Since 2007, NREL has worked with the General Services Administration (GSA) to conduct energy assessments and identify opportunities for distributed

235

Lighting technology specifications for relighting federal buildings  

SciTech Connect

Under a Federal Relighting Initiative (FRI) project, a set of Master Lighting Technology Specifications was developed for use by the Federal sector in relighting buildings. The specifications were to cover all major lighting technologies. The initial set was developed and issued for extensive peer review in December 1991. Extensive comments were received from industry, Federal sector participants (DOD, GSA, NASA, DOE, etc.), national laboratories, professional lighting organizations, private lighting professionals, and recognized experts in the lighting community. The document underwent extensive revision and was reissued in June 1992 for a second round of peer review. The current FRI Lighting Technology Specifications are organized into two sections: (1) Technical Notes and (2) Master Specifications. The Technical Notes contain explanations that enable the users to understand the background and reasons for specification requirements. The Master Specifications are organized in the Construction Specifications Institute (CSI) format and are intended to form the basis for competitive bidding and contracting to undertake relighting initiatives.

Harris, L. [USDOE, Washington, DC (United States); Purcell, C. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States); Gordon, H. [Burt Hill Kosar Rittelmann Associates (United States); McKay, H. [McKay (Hayden) Lighting Design (United States)

1992-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

236

Review of BPA Funded Sturgeon, Resident Fish and Wildlife Projects, 1989/1990.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) held a public meeting on November 6-7, 1990, for the purpose of review, coordination, and consultation of the BPA-funded projects for sturgeon, resident fish, and wildlife in the Columbia River Basin (Basin). The comments received after the meeting were favorable and the participants agreed that the meeting was stimulating and productive. The information exchanged should lead to better coordination with other projects throughout the Basin. The following pages list the projects by title, the project leaders and BPA's project officers, and an abstract of each leaders presentation. These summaries are in some cases preliminary; they are subject to change and should not be quoted without consulting the project leader.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1990-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

237

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

247 247 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 138 / Wednesday, July 17, 1996 / Notices by the Secretary of Commerce. The purpose of this meeting is to review the 1996 Award applications and to select applications to be considered in the site visit stage of the evaluation. The applications under review contain trade secrets and proprietary commercial information submitted to the Government in confidence. DATES: The meeting will convene August 7, 1996, at 8:00 a.m. and adjourn at 5:00 p.m. on August 7, 1996. The entire meeting will be closed. ADDRESS: The meeting will be held at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Administration Building, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Harry Hertz, Director for Quality Programs, National Institute of

238

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09 09 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 1997 / Notices Information Officer, publishes this notice containing proposed information collection requests at the beginning of the Departmental review of the information collection. Each proposed information collection, grouped by office, contains the following: (1) Type of review requested, e.g., new, revision, extension, existing or reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of the collection; (4) Description of the need for, and proposed use of, the information; (5) Respondents and frequency of collection; and (6) Reporting and/or Recordkeeping burden. ED invites public comment at the address specified above. Copies of the requests are available from Patrick J. Sherrill at the address specified above. The Department of Education is

239

Federal Energy Management Program: News  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PROJECT FUNDING PROJECT FUNDING TECHNOLOGIES SERVICES NEWS & EVENTS EERE » Federal Energy Management Program » News & Events Site Map Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Federal Energy Management Program: News to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: News on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: News on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: News on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: News on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: News on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: News on AddThis.com... News Events News Subscribe to RSS News Feed RSS Feed icon January 13, 2014 FEMP Offers New Advanced eTraining on UESCs The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Federal Energy Management Program

240

Energy Savings Performance Contract Project Facilitators | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Savings Performance Contract Project Facilitators Energy Savings Performance Contract Project Facilitators Energy Savings Performance Contract Project Facilitators October 7, 2013 - 1:39pm Addthis Project facilitators help Federal agencies avoid obstacles and expedite projects, guiding the acquisition team through the process of developing, awarding, and verifying savings from energy savings performance contract (ESPC) projects. Project facilitators are experienced, unbiased advisors who: Provide consultation about contract and funding issues, technology and engineering considerations, and measurement and verification processes Review cost and technical proposals Draft the agency's task order request for proposal Provide other services as requested. Federal agencies developing U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) ESPC projects

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

CEQ Releases Two Handbooks on Improving Efficiency of Federal...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of Federal Environmental Reviews CEQ Releases Two Handbooks on Improving Efficiency of Federal Environmental Reviews March 5, 2013 - 4:43pm Addthis The Council on Environmental...

242

Federal participation in LEED  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The federal government has been an active participant in the development and use of USGBC's Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design Green Building Rating System (LEED). This paper presents a review of this participation and some expectations for ongoing partnership.

Payne, Christopher; Dyer, Beverly

2004-11-10T23:59:59.000Z

243

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Federal Energy Management Program Technical Assistance Project 224 Altus Air Force Base Solar Technologies  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The principal goal of this project was to evaluate altus Air Force Base for building integrated silicon or thin film module photovoltaic opportunities. This report documents PNNL's efforts and documents study conclusions.

Russo, Bryan J.

2010-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

244

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Requirements to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal...

245

Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority Project Abstracts; May 25-27, Portland, Oregon, 1997 Annual Review.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Abstracts are presented from the 1997 Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Review of Projects. The purpose was to provide information and education on the approximate 127 million dollars in Northwest electric ratepayer fish and wildlife mitigation projects funded annually.

Allee, Brian J. (Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority, Portland, OR)

1997-06-26T23:59:59.000Z

246

Federal Wind Energy Assistance through NREL (Fact Sheet)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

NREL assists with wind resource assessment and development activities initiated by federal agencies to facilitate distributed renewable energy projects at federal agency sites. This brief outlines the process for requesting NREL assistance with federal wind energy projects.

Not Available

2009-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

247

Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practicee on Federal Landscaped Grounds  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

W W A S H I N G T O N April 26, 1994 MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES SUBJECT: Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practicee on Federal Landscaped Grounds The Report of the National Performance Review contains recommendations for a series of environmental actions, including one to increase environmentally and economically beneficial landscaping practices at Federal facilities and federally funded project.. Environmentally beneficial landscaping entail. utilizing techniques that complement and enhance the local environment and seek to minimize the adverse effects that the landscaping will have on it. In particular, this means using regionally native plants and employing landscaping practices and technologies that conserve water

248

federal agency  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Federal Agency Information. ... Information on Biometric Standards. Analysis Model for Selection of Concensus Standards.

2013-07-25T23:59:59.000Z

249

Federal Energy Management Program: Distributed Energy Resources...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Project Implementation to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Distributed Energy Resources and Combined Heat and Power Project Implementation on Facebook...

250

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 51 / Tuesday, March 16, 2004 / Notices meeting and will be provided opportunities to speak following previously scheduled speakers. Speakers will be requested to limit their initial comments to about five minutes. Speakers who need more than five minutes should indicate the length of time desired in their request. Depending on the number of speakers, DOE may need to limit speakers to five minutes initially but will provide additional opportunities as time permits. Speakers may also provide written materials to supplement their presentations. Oral and written comments will be given equal consideration. DOE will begin the meeting with an overview of the proposed Low-Emission Boiler System Project. The meeting will not be conducted as an evidentiary

251

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

139 139 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 23, 2004 / Notices EIS until March 31, 2004. Once scoping ended, BPA revised the Scoping Summary to reflect all comments received, and republished the summary on April 7, 2004. Based on the results of the public scoping conducted for the Transmission Policy-Level EIS and internal considerations such as the current and most recently projected activities of BPA's Transmission Business Line and budget issues, BPA has decided that continued consideration of a comprehensive policy for BPA's transmission business is not in the best interests of the agency at this time. As a result, it is no longer necessary to proceed with preparation of the Transmission Policy-Level EIS. Therefore, BPA is issuing this notice of

252

Federal Energy Management Program: Services  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Services to Services to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Services on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Services on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Services on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Services on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Services on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Services on AddThis.com... Project Assistance Training Outreach Services The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) offers specialized services through: Technical and Project Assistance: Find resources for technical assistance and information about FEMP calls for projects. Training: Look up FEMP-produced live and on-demand courses, workshops, and webinars. Outreach: Get information about awards and campaigns that motivate energy-

253

Hanford Sludge Treatment Project 105-KW Final Safety Analysis Report Review, August 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Site Visit Report Site Visit Report Sludge Treatment Project 105-KW Final Safety Analysis Report Review May 2011 August 2011 Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 4.0 Results .................................................................................................................................................... 2

254

Hanford Sludge Treatment Project 105-KW Final Safety Analysis Report Review, August 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site Visit Report Site Visit Report Sludge Treatment Project 105-KW Final Safety Analysis Report Review May 2011 August 2011 Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 4.0 Results .................................................................................................................................................... 2

255

Phase 5 storage (Project W-112) Central Waste Complex operational readiness review, final report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document is the final report for the RFSH conducted, Contractor Operational Readiness Review (ORR) for the Central Waste Complex (CWC) Project W-112 and Interim Safety Basis implementation. As appendices, all findings, observations, lines of inquiry and the implementation plan are included.

Wight, R.H.

1997-05-30T23:59:59.000Z

256

Mangla Dam Raising Project (Pakistan): General Review and Socio-Spatial Impact Assessment  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Mangla Dam Raising Project (Pakistan): General Review and Socio-Spatial Impact Assessment Saheeb, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad-44000, Pakistan saheebk@ceme.nust.edu.pk Abstract. INTRODUCTION Pakistan has recently successfully completed the raising of Mangla dam, a major water works system

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

257

Solar Pilot Plant project review No. 9, May 4--5, 1977. CDRL item 10  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Drawings and illustrations for the project review are presented. These are included for the 10 MW(e) solar pilot plant, the collector subsystem, the receiver subsystem, the electrical power generation system and balance of plant, plant controls and transient analysis, availability and safety, pilot and commercial plant designs, and summary and recommendations. (MHR)

None

1977-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

258

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

30 30 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 214 / Friday, November 5, 1999 / Notices natural or human environment. Because no significant environmental impacts will result from implementation of the proposed action, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required and will not be prepared. The Army will not initiate the proposed action for 15 days following the completion of the EA and FNSI and publication of a public notice in a local newspaper. This EA is available for review at the following repositories: Lassen Community College Library, Highway 139, P.O. Box 3000, Susanville, CA 96130; Lassen County Public Works, 707 Nevada Street, Suite 2, Susanville, CA 96130; and the Washoe County Library, Downtown Branch, 301 South Center Street, Reno NV 89501. Dated: November 1, 1999.

259

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

146 146 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 122 / Friday, June 23, 2000 / Notices instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. EPA estimates that the changes discussed today, when implemented, will reduce burden by 23,000 hours and an insignificant number of dollars. Dated: June 14, 2000. Elizabeth Cotsworth, Director, Office of Solid Waste.

260

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

87 87 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 173 / Thursday, September 5, 1996 / Notices of burden accurate, (4) how might the Department enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected, and (5) how might the Department minimize the burden of this collection on the respondents, including through the use of information technology. Dated: August 29, 1996. Gloria Parker, Director, Information Resources Group. Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Type of Review: New. Title: Guidance on the Goals 2000 Amendments (Draft). Frequency: One-time submission. Affected Public: State, local or Tribal Gov't, SEAs or LEAs. Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour Burden: Responses: 30 Burden Hours: 3,000 Abstract: The Omnibus Consolidated Rescissions and Appropriations Act of

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Evaluation of Federal Energy Savings Performance Contracting -- Methodology for Comparing Processes and Costs of ESPC and Appropriatins-Funded Energy Projects  

SciTech Connect

Federal agencies have had performance contracting authority since 1985, when Congress first authorized agencies to enter into shared energy savings agreements with Public Law 99-272, the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. By the end of FY 2001, agencies had used energy savings performance contracts (ESPCs) to attract private-sector investment of over $1 billion to improve the energy efficiency of federal buildings. Executive Order 13123 directs agencies to maximize their use of alternative financing contracting mechanisms such as ESPCs when life-cycle cost effective to reduce energy use and cost in their facilities and operations. Continuing support for ESPCs at the Administration and Congressional levels is evident in the pending comprehensive national energy legislation, which repeals the sunset provision on ESPC authority and extends ESPC authority to water savings projects. Despite the Congressional and Presidential directives to use ESPCs, some agencies have been reluctant to do so. Decision makers in these agencies see no reason to enter into long-term obligations to pay interest on borrowed money out of their own operating budgets if instead Congress will grant them appropriations to pay for the improvements up front. Questions frequently arise about whether pricing in ESPCs, which are negotiated for best value, is as favorable as prices obtained through competitive sourcing, and whether ESPC as a means of implementing energy conservation projects is as life-cycle cost effective as the standard practice of funding these projects through appropriations. The lack of any quantitative analysis to address these issues was the impetus for this study. ESPCs are by definition cost-effective because of their ''pay-from-savings'' requirement and guarantee, but do their interest costs and negotiated pricing extract an unreasonably high price? Appropriations seem to be the least-cost option, because the U.S. Treasury can borrow money at lower interest rates than the private sector, but appropriations for energy projects are scarce. What are the costs associated with requesting funding and waiting for appropriations? And how is the value of an energy project affected if savings that are not guaranteed do not last? The objective of this study was to develop and demonstrate methods to help federal energy managers take some of the guesswork out of obtaining best value from spending on building retrofit energy improvements. We developed a method for comparing all-inclusive prices of energy conservation measures (ECMs) implemented using appropriated funds and through ESPCs that illustrates how agencies can use their own appropriations-funded project experience to ensure fair ESPC pricing. The second method documented in this report is for comparing life-cycle costs. This method illustrates how agencies can use their experience, and their judgment concerning their prospects for appropriations, to decide between financing and waiting.

Hughes, P.J.

2002-10-08T23:59:59.000Z

262

Evaluation of Federal Energy Savings Performance Contracting -- Methodology for Comparing Processes and Costs of ESPC and Appropriatins-Funded Energy Projects  

SciTech Connect

Federal agencies have had performance contracting authority since 1985, when Congress first authorized agencies to enter into shared energy savings agreements with Public Law 99-272, the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. By the end of FY 2001, agencies had used energy savings performance contracts (ESPCs) to attract private-sector investment of over $1 billion to improve the energy efficiency of federal buildings. Executive Order 13123 directs agencies to maximize their use of alternative financing contracting mechanisms such as ESPCs when life-cycle cost effective to reduce energy use and cost in their facilities and operations. Continuing support for ESPCs at the Administration and Congressional levels is evident in the pending comprehensive national energy legislation, which repeals the sunset provision on ESPC authority and extends ESPC authority to water savings projects. Despite the Congressional and Presidential directives to use ESPCs, some agencies have been reluctant to do so. Decision makers in these agencies see no reason to enter into long-term obligations to pay interest on borrowed money out of their own operating budgets if instead Congress will grant them appropriations to pay for the improvements up front. Questions frequently arise about whether pricing in ESPCs, which are negotiated for best value, is as favorable as prices obtained through competitive sourcing, and whether ESPC as a means of implementing energy conservation projects is as life-cycle cost effective as the standard practice of funding these projects through appropriations. The lack of any quantitative analysis to address these issues was the impetus for this study. ESPCs are by definition cost-effective because of their ''pay-from-savings'' requirement and guarantee, but do their interest costs and negotiated pricing extract an unreasonably high price? Appropriations seem to be the least-cost option, because the U.S. Treasury can borrow money at lower interest rates than the private sector, but appropriations for energy projects are scarce. What are the costs associated with requesting funding and waiting for appropriations? And how is the value of an energy project affected if savings that are not guaranteed do not last? The objective of this study was to develop and demonstrate methods to help federal energy managers take some of the guesswork out of obtaining best value from spending on building retrofit energy improvements. We developed a method for comparing all-inclusive prices of energy conservation measures (ECMs) implemented using appropriated funds and through ESPCs that illustrates how agencies can use their own appropriations-funded project experience to ensure fair ESPC pricing. The second method documented in this report is for comparing life-cycle costs. This method illustrates how agencies can use their experience, and their judgment concerning their prospects for appropriations, to decide between financing and waiting.

Hughes, P.J.

2002-10-08T23:59:59.000Z

263

Geothermal direct-heat utilization assistance: Federal assistance program. Quarterly project progress report, October--December 1995  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The report summarizes geothermal technical assistance, R&D and technology transfer activities of the Geo-Heat Center at Oregon Institute of Technology for the first quarter of FY-96. It describes 90 contacts with parties during this period related to technical assistance with geothermal direct heat projects. Areas dealt with include geothermal heat pumps, space heating, greenhouses, aquaculture, equipment and resources. Research activities are summarized on low-temperature resource assessment, geothermal district heating system cost evaluation and silica waste utilization project. Outreach activities include the publication of a geothermal direct use Bulletin, dissemination of information, geothermal library, technical papers and seminars, development of a webpage, and progress monitor reports on geothermal resources and utilization.

NONE

1996-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

264

Microsoft PowerPoint - 16.1045_Peer Reviews Panel_Lehman Workshop Briefing w-headings  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Science Science Peer Reviews 101 Daniel R. Lehman, Director Office of Project Assessment Office of Project Assessment Office of Science Peer Review 101 Panel Members Mr. Daniel Lehman, Director, Office of Project Assessment Office of Science Mr. Hanley Lee, Deputy Manager, SLAC Site Office (formerly SC Federal Project Director for the LCLS Project) Mr. James Krupnick, Associate Lab. Director/Chief Operating Officer Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (formerly Project Director for the Molecular Foundry Project) Mr. Scott Samuelson, PMP Acting Director, NNSA Office of Major Systems Acquisitions (formerly NNSA Federal Project Director for the NIF Project) Office of Science Peer Reviews 101 (formerly NNSA Federal Project Director for the NIF Project) 2 Office of Science Peer Reviews 101

265

Geothermal direct-heat utilization assistance. Quarterly project progress report, July 1996--September 1996. Federal Assistance Program  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes geothermal technical assistance, R&D and technology transfer activities of the Geo-Heat Center at Oregon Institute of Technology for the fourth quarter of FY-96. It describes 152 contacts with parties during this period related to technical assistance with geothermal direct heat projects. Areas dealt with include geothermal heat pumps, space heating, greenhouses, aquaculture, equipment, economics and resources. Research activities are summarized on greenhouse peaking. Outreach activities include the publication of a geothermal direct use Bulletin, dissemination of information, geothermal library, technical papers and seminars, and progress monitor reports on geothermal resources and utilization.

Lienau, P.

1996-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

266

Geothermal direct-heat utilization assistance. Federal Assistance Program, Quarterly project progress report, October--December 1994  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The report summarizes activities of the Geo-Heat Center (GHC) at Oregon Institute of Technology for the first quarter of Fiscal Year 1995. It describes contacts with parties during this period related to assistance with geothermal direct heat projects. Areas dealt with include geothermal heat pumps, space heating, greenhouses, aquaculture, resources and equipment. Research is also being conducted on geothermal energy cost evaluation, low-temperature geothermal resource assessment, use of silica waste from the Cerro Prieto geothermal field as construction materials and geothermal heat pumps. Outreach activities include the publication of a quarterly Bulletin on direct heat applications and dissemination of information on low-temperature geothermal resources and utilization.

Not Available

1994-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

267

Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Renewable Energy Renewable Energy to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy on AddThis.com... Energy-Efficient Products Technology Deployment Renewable Energy Federal Requirements Renewable Resources & Technologies Project Planning & Implementation Project Assistance Resource Maps & Screening Tools Purchasing Renewable Power Case Studies Training Working Group Contacts

268

Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Contacts  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Contacts to someone by E-mail Contacts to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Contacts on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Contacts on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Contacts on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Contacts on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Contacts on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Contacts on AddThis.com... Energy-Efficient Products Technology Deployment Renewable Energy Federal Requirements Renewable Resources & Technologies Project Planning & Implementation Project Assistance Resource Maps & Screening Tools Purchasing Renewable Power

269

Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Annual Energy Outlook Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections March 2012 Independent Statistics & Analysis www.eia.gov U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 U.S. Energy Information Administration | AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections i This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA's data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the Department of Energy or

270

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy Management...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Energy Management Program Contacts to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy Management Program Contacts on Facebook Tweet about Federal...

271

Review of Alternate Hydrazine Injection Data: South Texas Project Power Station -- Unit 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report reviews South Texas Project Unit 1 chemistry data collected before, during, and after alternate hydrazine injections in 1999. Normally, hydrazine is injected into the condensate system just after the condensate polishers, but during alternate hydrazine injection periods, hydrazine was fed into the feedwater system just after the last feedwater heater. The main objective of these injections was to reduce feedwater iron concentrations; additionally, their effect on several chemistry parameters ...

2001-06-11T23:59:59.000Z

272

Operational Awareness Review of the Hanford Sludge Treatment Project, April 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

HIAR-RL-2011-04-07 HIAR-RL-2011-04-07 Site: DOE-Richland Operations Office Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Sludge Treatment Project Dates of Activity : 11/17/2010 - 04/07/2011 Report Preparer: Jake Wechselberger Activity Description/Purpose: The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed operational awareness reviews of the Sludge Treatment Project (STP), Engineered Container Retrieval and Transfer System (ECRTS) during site visits. Result: On November 17, 2010, a HSS representative participated in a tour of the STP test facility. The HSS representative was also briefed by the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) Project Engineer, the CHPRC STP Design

273

Implementation Plan for the Hawaii Geothermal Project Environmental Impact Statement (DOE Review Draft:)  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy (DOE) is preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that identifies and evaluates the environmental impacts associated with the proposed Hawaii Geothermal Project (HGP), as defined by the State of Hawaii in its 1990 proposal to Congress (DBED 1990). The location of the proposed project is shown in Figure 1.1. The EIS is being prepared pursuant to the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as implemented by the President's Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations (40 CFR Parts 1500-1508) and the DOE NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021), effective May 26, 1992. The State's proposal for the four-phase HGP consists of (1) exploration and testing of the geothermal resource beneath the slopes of the active Kilauea volcano on the Island of Hawaii (Big Island), (2) demonstration of deep-water power cable technology in the Alenuihaha Channel between the Big Island and Mau, (3) verification and characterization of the geothermal resource on the Big Island, and (4) construction and operation of commercial geothermal power production facilities on the Big Island, with overland and submarine transmission of electricity from the Big Island to Oahu and possibly other islands. DOE prepared appropriate NEPA documentation for separate federal actions related to Phase 1 and 2 research projects, which have been completed. This EIS will consider Phases 3 and 4, as well as reasonable alternatives to the HGP. Such alternatives include biomass coal, solar photovoltaic, wind energy, and construction and operation of commercial geothermal power production facilities on the Island of Hawaii (for exclusive use on the Big Island). In addition, the EIs will consider the reasonable alternatives among submarine cable technologies, geothermal extraction, production, and power generating technologies; pollution control technologies; overland and submarine power transmission routes; sites reasonably suited to support project facilities in a safe and environmentally acceptable manner; and non-power generating alternatives, such as conservation and demand-side management.

None

1992-09-18T23:59:59.000Z

274

Revealing the Hidden Value that the Federal Investment Tax Credit...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

that the Federal Investment Tax Credit and Treasury Cash Grant Provide To Community Wind Projects Title Revealing the Hidden Value that the Federal Investment Tax Credit and...

275

Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

To learn more about integrating renewable energy technologies into Federal construction projects or to submit comments on this guide, contact: Anne Sprunt Crawley Federal Energy...

276

Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Federal Register Vol. 76, No. 83 Friday, April 29, 2011 Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Project No. 14147-000 Storage Development...

277

Federal Energy Management Program: Qualified List of Energy Service...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Federal Energy Management Program Search Search Help Federal Energy Management Program HOME ABOUT THE PROGRAM PROGRAM AREAS LAWS & REGULATIONS INFORMATION RESOURCES PROJECT FUNDING...

278

Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Savings Performance Contract  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Energy Savings Energy Savings Performance Contract Project Facilitators to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Savings Performance Contract Project Facilitators on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Savings Performance Contract Project Facilitators on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Savings Performance Contract Project Facilitators on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Savings Performance Contract Project Facilitators on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Savings Performance Contract Project Facilitators on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Savings Performance Contract Project Facilitators on AddThis.com...

279

EIA-Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review-Evaluation of Projections in  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

9) 9) The Energy Information Administration (EIA) produces projections of energy supply and demand each year in the Annual Energy Outlook (AEO). The projections in the AEO are not statements of what will happen but of what might happen, given the assumptions and methodologies. The Reference case projection assumes trends that are consistent with historical and current market behavior, technological and demographic changes, and current laws and regulations. The potential impacts of pending or proposed legislation, regulations, and standards-or of sections of legislation that have been enacted but that require implementing regulations or appropriation of funds that are not provided or specified in the legislation itself-are not reflected in the projections. Thus, the AEO Reference case provides an impartial baseline that can be used to analyze potential new policies or legislative initiatives. The analysis in the AEO primarily focuses on a Reference case, lower and higher economic growth cases, and lower and higher oil price cases. However, approximately 30 alternative cases are generally included in the AEO. Readers are encouraged to review the full range of cases, which address many of the uncertainties inherent in long-term projections.

280

Economic Development Impacts of Community Wind Projects: A Review and Empirical Evaluation  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Community wind projects have long been touted (both anecdotally and in the literature) to increase the economic development impacts of wind projects, but most analyses of community wind have been based on expected results from hypothetical projects. This report provides a review of previous economic development analyses of community wind projects and compares these projected results with empirical impacts from projects currently in operation. A review of existing literature reveals two primary conclusions. First, construction-period impacts are often thought to be comparable for both community-and absentee-owned facilities. Second, operations-period economic impacts are observed to be greater for community-owned projects. The majority of studies indicate that the range of increased operations-period impact is on the order of 1.5 to 3.4 times. New retrospective analysis of operating community wind projects finds that total employment impacts from completed community wind projects are estimated to be on the order of four to six 1-year jobs per-MW during construction and 0.3 to 0.6 long-term jobs per-MW during operations. In addition, when comparing retrospective results of community wind to hypothetical average absentee projects, construction-period employment impacts are 1.1 to 1.3 times higher and operations-period impacts are 1.1 to 2.8 times higher for community wind. Comparing the average of the completed community wind projects studied here with retrospective analysis of the first 1,000 MW of wind in Colorado and Iowa indicates that construction-period impacts are as much as 3.1 times higher for community wind, and operations-period impacts are as much as 1.8 times higher. Ultimately, wind projects are a source of jobs and economic development, and community wind projects are shown to have increased impact both during the construction and operations-period of a wind power plant. The extent of increased impact is primarily a function of local ownership and return on investment. As such, policies that prioritize higher levels of local ownership are likely to result in increased economic development impacts. Furthermore, the increased economic development impact of community wind shown here should not be undervalued. As the wind industry grows and approaches penetrations in the U.S. electricity market of 20%, social opposition to new wind power projects may increase. Community wind could provide a valuable strategy for building community support of wind power - especially in communities that are new to wind power. This analysis finds that total employment impacts from completed community wind projects are on the order of four to six 1-year jobs per-MW during construction and 0.3 to 0.6 long-term jobs per-MW during operations. Furthermore, when comparing community wind to hypothetical average absentee projects, construction-period employment impacts are 1.1 to 1.3 times higher and operations-period impacts are 1.1 to 2.8 times higher for community wind. Comparing the average of the completed projects studied here with retrospective analysis of the first 1,000 MW of wind in Colorado and Iowa shows construction-period impacts are as much as 3.1 times higher for community wind, and operations-period impacts are as much as 1.8 times higher. As the wind industry has grown, community wind has largely been a peripheral development model. However, this analysis shows that wind projects are a source of jobs and economic development, and that community wind projects have greater economic development impacts than absentee-owned projects. As such, policies that prioritize higher levels of local ownership are likely to result in increased economic development impacts. While the magnitude of increased benefit is primarily a function of local ownership and project profitability, the increased economic development impact of all community wind projects should not be undervalued. The ability of community wind projects to disperse economic impacts within the states and communities where they are built and to engage local community members

Lantz, E.; Tegen, S.

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Sustainable Sustainable Federal Fleets to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Operations & Maintenance Greenhouse Gases Water Efficiency Data Center Energy Efficiency Industrial Facilities Sustainable Federal Fleets Laboratories for the 21st Century Institutional Change

282

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution -  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on AddThis.com... Energy-Efficient Products Technology Deployment

283

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) FEMP Technical Assistance U.S. General Services Administration Project 195 John Seiberling Federal Office Building and U.S. Courthouse, Akron, Ohio  

SciTech Connect

This report documents the findings from an onsite audit of the John Seiberling Federal building located in Akron, Ohio. The Federal landlord for this building is the General Services Administration (GSA). The focus of the audit was to identify various no-cost or low-cost energy efficiency opportunities that, once implemented, would reduce in either electrical and gas consumption and increase the operational efficiency of the building. This audit also provided an opportunity to identify potential capital cost projects that should be considered in the to acquire additional energy (electric and gas) and water savings to further increase the operational efficiency of the building.

Arends, J.; Sandusky, William F.

2010-05-28T23:59:59.000Z

284

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery: Progress review No. 51 quarter ending June 30, 1987  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Progress review on enhanced oil recovery covers: Chemical Flooding /emdash/ Field Projects; Chemical Flooding /emdash/ Supporting Research; Gas Displacement /emdash/ Supporting Research; Thermal Recovery /emdash/ Supporting Research; Resource Assessment Technology; Geoscience; Environmental Technology; Microbial Technology.

Not Available

1988-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

285

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Painesville Municipal Electric Power Vanadium Redox Battery Demo Project - Jodi Startari, Ashlawn Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Electric Power Electric Power Vanadium Redox Battery Demonstration Project Jodi Startari Ashlawn Energy LLC Briefing Overview * Painesville Municipal Electric Power Plant Project Synopsis * Vanadium Redox Flow Battery Technology * City of Painesville Municipal Electric Plant History * Project Multiple Objectives and Additional Detail * Project Risk Analysis presented at previous Peer Review * Project to date progress * Cost Distribution * Summary/Conclusions * Future Tasks * Questions US Produced Vanadium Redox Flow Battery for Bulk Storage, Peak Shaving * 8 MW Hour redox flow battery (1MW 8 hours) * To be installed at Painesville Municipal Electric Plant (PMEP), a 32 MW coal fired facility * Most efficient PMEP operation is steady state at 26 MW (lowest emissions, lowest operating cost)

286

Federal Register  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

151 151 Rules and Regulations Federal Register Vol. 60, No. 203 Friday, October 20, 1995 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed to and codified in the Code of Federal IRegulations, which is published under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1610. The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each week. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Western Area Power Administration 10 CFR Part 905 Energy Planning and Management Program AGENCY: Western Area Power Administration, DOE. A cmoN: Final rule. summARv: The Western Area Power Administration is publishing this final rule to adopt an Energy Planning and

287

NETL Publications: Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 Conference Proceedings 3 Conference Proceedings Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting August 20-22, 2013 Table of Contents Disclaimer Presentations PRESENTATIONS Tuesday, August 20, 2013 Welcome and Introduction Traci Rodosta, Carbon Storage Technology Manager, U.S. DOE NETL PLENARY SESSION - KEYNOTE PRESENTATIONS Moderator: Bruce Brown, Infrastructure Coordinator, U.S. DOE NETL Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships Overview Bruce Brown, Infrastructure Coordinator, U.S. DOE NETL A Decade of CCS Development: A Global Review John Gale, General Manager, IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme Onshore Monitoring, Verification, Accounting, and Assessment Lessons Learned Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships Panel Lee Spangler, BSCSP; Neeraj Gupta, MRCSP; Charlie Gorecki, PCOR; George Koperna, SECARB

288

Renewable Energy Project Overview | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Renewable Energy Project Overview Renewable Energy Project Overview Presentation-given at the Spring 2009 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meeting-covers federal...

289

Review of the independent risk assessment of the proposed Cabrillo liquified natural gas deepwater port project.  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In March 2005, the United States Coast Guard requested that Sandia National Laboratories provide a technical review and evaluation of the appropriateness and completeness of models, assumptions, analyses, and risk management options presented in the Cabrillo Port LNG Deepwater Port Independent Risk Assessment-Revision 1 (Cabrillo Port IRA). The goal of Sandia's technical evaluation of the Cabrillo Port IRA was to assist the Coast Guard in ensuring that the hazards to the public and property from a potential LNG spill during transfer, storage, and regasification operations were appropriately evaluated and estimated. Sandia was asked to review and evaluate the Cabrillo Port IRA results relative to the risk and safety analysis framework developed in the recent Sandia report, ''Guidance on Risk Analysis and Safety Implications of a Large Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Spill over Water''. That report provides a framework for assessing hazards and identifying approaches to minimize the consequences to people and property from an LNG spill over water. This report summarizes the results of the Sandia review of the Cabrillo Port IRA and supporting analyses. Based on our initial review, additional threat and hazard analyses, consequence modeling, and process safety considerations were suggested. The additional analyses recommended were conducted by the Cabrillo Port IRA authors in cooperation with Sandia and a technical review panel composed of representatives from the Coast Guard and the California State Lands Commission. The results from the additional analyses improved the understanding and confidence in the potential hazards and consequences to people and property from the proposed Cabrillo Port LNG Deepwater Port Project. The results of the Sandia review, the additional analyses and evaluations conducted, and the resolutions of suggested changes for inclusion in a final Cabrillo Port IRA are summarized in this report.

Gritzo, Louis Alan; Hightower, Marion Michael; Covan, John Morgan; Luketa-Hanlin, Anay Josephine

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

290

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reedsport OPT Wave Park, LLC Project No. 12713-002 Reedsport OPT Wave Park, LLC Project No. 12713-002 Oregon NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (December 3, 2010) In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission or FERC's) regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed Reedsport OPT Wave Park, LLC's application for license for the Reedsport OPT Wave Park Project (FERC Project No. 12713-002), which would be located in Oregon State territorial waters about 2.5 nautical miles off the coast near Reedsport, in Douglas County, Oregon. Staff prepared an environmental assessment (EA), which analyzes the potential environmental effects of licensing the project and concludes that licensing the project,

291

Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs (FSME) Procedure Approval Reviewing the Non-Common Performance Indicator,  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This procedure was first issued by the former Office of State and Tribal Programs. As of October 1, 2006, any changes to the procedure will be the responsibility of the FSME Procedure Contact. Copies of FSME procedures will be available through the NRC website. Procedure Title: Reviewing the Non-Common

Robert Lewis; A. Duncan White; Janine F. Katanic

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

292

ESS 2012 Peer Review - State & Federal Energy Storage Technology Advancement Partnership - Todd Olinsky-Paul, CESA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Todd Olinsky-Paul Clean Energy States Alliance The Renaissance Hotel Washington, D.C. September 2012 Thank You: Dr. Imre Gyuk U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Dan Borneo Sandia National Laboratories ESTAP is a project of CESA Clean Energy States Alliance (CESA) is a non-profit organization providing a forum for states to work together to implement effective clean energy policies & programs: - Information Exchange - Partnership Development - Joint Projects (National RPS Collaborative, Interstate Turbine Advisory Council) - Clean Energy Program Design & Evaluations - Analysis and Reports CESA is supported by a coalition of states and public utilities representing the leading U.S. public clean energy programs.

293

Federal Government Project Performance Benchmarks  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

equipment and strategies such as vending machines, lighting, laundryoffi ce equipment, refrigeration, industrial process improvements, staff training, and utility tariff...

294

Comments on the Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on the Request for Information on Improving Performance of on the Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects Comments on the Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Request for Information seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal authorizations. On September 25, the public comment period was extended to October 31, 2013. Comments received are available below. Comments from Lee Cunningham, sent September 23, 2013 Comments from Patrick Ledger of Arizona's G&T Cooperatives, sent September 25, 2013

295

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Interagency Energy...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Meetings to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Interagency Energy Management Task Force Meetings on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management...

296

Review of Potential Federal and State Green House Gas Policy Drivers for Combined Heat and Power Systems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The electric power generation sector contributes about one-third of all green house gas (GHG) emissions in the United States. To curb the reduction of green house gas emissions, all options in the electric power value chain must be considered and evaluated. The more efficient utilization of natural gas fuel via use of distributed combined cooling, heating, and power (CHP) systems in the end-use sector may be one option to mitigating GHG emissions. This research project was undertaken to assess the extent...

2007-12-19T23:59:59.000Z

297

Hawaii Energy Strategy Project 2: Fossil Energy Review. Task IV. Scenario development and analysis  

SciTech Connect

The Hawaii Energy Strategy (HES) Program is a seven-project effort led by the State of Hawaii Department of Business, Economic Development & Tourism (DBEDT) to investigate a wide spectrum of Hawaii energy issues. The East-West Center`s Program on Resources: Energy and Minerals, has been assigned HES Project 2, Fossil Energy Review, which focuses on fossil energy use in Hawaii and the greater regional and global markets. HES Project 2 has four parts: Task I (World and Regional Fossil Energy Dynamics) covers petroleum, natural gas, and coal in global and regional contexts, along with a discussion of energy and the environment. Task II (Fossil Energy in Hawaii) focuses more closely on fossil energy use in Hawaii: current utilization and trends, the structure of imports, possible future sources of supply, fuel substitutability, and energy security. Task III`s emphasis is Greenfield Options; that is, fossil energy sources not yet used in Hawaii. This task is divided into two sections: first, an in-depth {open_quotes}Assessment of Coal Technology Options and Implications for the State of Hawaii,{close_quotes} along with a spreadsheet analysis model, which was subcontracted to the Environmental Assessment and Information Sciences Division of Argonne National Laboratory; and second, a chapter on liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the Asia-Pacific market and the issues surrounding possible introduction of LNG into the Hawaii market.

Yamaguchi, N.D.; Breazeale, K. [ed.

1993-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

298

Federal loan guaranty programs management report, Task III, Item 005. Tab I. Electric and hybrid vehicle research, development, and demonstration project. Tab II. Geothermal loan guaranty program  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The guaranty program on electric and hybrid vehicle research, development, and demonstration considers two aspects of loan guaranties: (1) how is the loan guaranty, as an incentive device, best integrated into an overall project strategy, and (2) to what extent can cost-effectiveness measurements be introduced to the loan guaranty review and approval process. The report on the geothermal loan guaranty program is an overview of a large number of existing program elements which, in the opinion of the financial community or the historical record of predecessor loan guaranty programs, can be seen to be (or have potential to become) troublesome. Included are relevant administrative, regulatory, and managerial guidelines, commentary, and ideas. (MCW)

Not Available

1977-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

299

Shadow Review of the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Transuranic Storage Area Retrieval Enclosue Restrieval Restart DOE Readiness Assessment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ID-2011-09-22 ID-2011-09-22 Site: Idaho Site - Idaho Cleanup Project Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Shadow Review of the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) Transuranic Storage Area-Retrieval Enclosure (TSA-RE) Retrieval Restart Department of Energy Readiness Assessment Dates of Activity : 09/20/2011 - 09/22/2011 Report Preparer: Aleem Boatright Activity Description/Purpose: A review of nuclear safety implementation verification review (IVR) procedures and processes was conducted at the Idaho Site from September 12-22, 2011. The scope originally included shadowing of the Department of Energy (DOE) Idaho Operations Office (DOE-ID) Idaho Cleanup Project IVR for the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project (SBWTP).

300

Shadow Review of the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Transuranic Storage Area Retrieval Enclosue Restrieval Restart DOE Readiness Assessment  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ID-2011-09-22 ID-2011-09-22 Site: Idaho Site - Idaho Cleanup Project Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Shadow Review of the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) Transuranic Storage Area-Retrieval Enclosure (TSA-RE) Retrieval Restart Department of Energy Readiness Assessment Dates of Activity : 09/20/2011 - 09/22/2011 Report Preparer: Aleem Boatright Activity Description/Purpose: A review of nuclear safety implementation verification review (IVR) procedures and processes was conducted at the Idaho Site from September 12-22, 2011. The scope originally included shadowing of the Department of Energy (DOE) Idaho Operations Office (DOE-ID) Idaho Cleanup Project IVR for the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project (SBWTP).

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

NETL: Turbines - UTSR Projects  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 Turbulent Flame Speed Measurements and Modeling of Syngas Fuels Georgia Tech Jerry Seitzman Project Dates: 812007 - 9302010 Area of Research: Combusion Federal Project...

302

Federal Energy Management Program: Distributed Energy Resources...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

regularly updated lists of Federal and state incentives applicable to CHP and biomassbiogas projects, including financial incentives and favorable regulatory treatment. Database...

303

Federal Energy Management Program: ESPC ENABLE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Extensive project assistance and technical support from the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) experts to ensure success. Through the ESPC ENABLE program, smaller...

304

Environmental Management Construction Project Review of the Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility, July 19-22, 210  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Activity Report for the Shadowing of the Environmental Management Construction Project Review of the Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility on July 19-22, 2010 A Department of Energy Construction Project Review (CPR) of the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) project was conducted on July 19-22, 2010, at the request of the Principal Deputy Secretary, Office of Environmental Management (EM-2). The purpose of the review was to assess the cost, schedule, and technical progress against the approved Performance Baseline. Specific review areas were Engineering; Commissioning; Environment, Safety, Health, and Quality Assurance; Cost, Schedule, and Risk; and Management and Acquisition.

305

Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Project Cask and MCO Helium Purge System Design Review Completion Report Project A.5 and A.6  

SciTech Connect

This report documents the results of the design verification performed on the Cask and Multiple Canister Over-pack (MCO) Helium Purge System. The helium purge system is part of the Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Project Cask Loadout System (CLS) at 100K area. The design verification employed the ''Independent Review Method'' in accordance with Administrative Procedure (AP) EN-6-027-01.

ARD, K.E.

2000-04-19T23:59:59.000Z

306

Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project melter system preliminary design technical review meeting  

SciTech Connect

The Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project sponsored a plasma are melter technical design review meeting to evaluate high-temperature melter system configurations for processing heterogeneous alpha-contaminated low-level radioactive waste (ALLW). Thermal processing experts representing Department of Energy contractors, the Environmental Protection Agency, and private sector companies participated in the review. The participants discussed issues and evaluated alternative configurations for three areas of the melter system design: plasma torch melters and graphite arc melters, offgas treatment options, and overall system configuration considerations. The Technical Advisory Committee for the review concluded that graphite arc melters are preferred over plasma torch melters for processing ALLW. Initiating involvement of stakeholders was considered essential at this stage of the design. For the offgas treatment system, the advisory committee raised the question whether to a use wet-dry or a dry-wet system. The committee recommended that the waste stream characterization, feed preparation, and the control system are essential design tasks for the high-temperature melter treatment system. The participants strongly recommended that a complete melter treatment system be assembled to conduct tests with nonradioactive surrogate waste material. A nonradioactive test bed would allow for inexpensive design and operational changes prior to assembling a system for radioactive waste treatment operations.

Eddy, T.L.; Raivo, B.D.; Soelberg, N.R.; Wiersholm, O.

1995-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

307

Federal Railroad Administration  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE TRANSPORTATION EXTERNAL WORKING GROUP MEETING Pueblo, CO. September 20, 2005 Presented by Kevin R. Blackwell Radioactive Materials/Hazardous Materials Specialist Federal Railroad Administration - HQ Hazmat Division, Washington, DC. Federal Railroad Administration Dedicated Train Study - Report to Congress November 2003 - FRA' s Ofc. Of Research & Development (RDV), as lead on the Dedicated Train Study (DTS), received draft final report from the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (VNTSC), the contractor conducting the study. February, 2004 - FRA completed review of DFR and submitted editorial corrections back to VNTSC. Final draft of the DTS with editorial corrections received from VNTSC in February, 2004. March to September 2004 -

308

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Ocean Renewable Power Company Maine, LLC Project No. 12711-005 Ocean Renewable Power Company Maine, LLC Project No. 12711-005 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED COBSCOOK BAY TIDAL ENERGY PROJECT (January 4, 2012) In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission or FERC's) regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed Ocean Renewable Power Company, LLC's application for an 8-year pilot license for the proposed Cobscook Bay Tidal Energy Project (FERC Project No. 12711-005), which would be located in Cobscook Bay in Washington County, Maine, and has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Energy

309

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: LIPA Smart Energy Corridor Project - Ming Mui, LIPA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Program Peer Review Meeting DE-OE0000220 LIPA Long Island Smart Energy Corridor Ming Mui and Sunil Katwala June 8, 2012 December 2008 LIPA Long Island Smart Energy Corridor Objective Life-cycle Funding ($K) Fiscal Years 2010 to 2015 DOE Funding $ 12,496K Total Project Cost $ 25,293K* Technical Scope (Insert graphic here) * Additional funding from LIPA and SUNY Research Foundation Smart Energy Corridor will: (1) Validate Smart Grid technologies; (2) Quantify Smart Grid costs and benefits; (3) Validate Smart Grid applications at a scale that can be readily adapted and replicated in individual homes and businesses. * Demonstrate Technolgy (DA, Sub Auto, AMI, DLC) * Marketing (TOU Rates, Webtools, Visualization) * Cyber Security (Vulneribility Testing & Hardening)

310

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Wholesale Electricity Market Design Project - Jim Ellison, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Photos placed in Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Wholesale Electricity Market Design Project September 28, 2012 Jim Ellison, Verne Loose, Ray Byrne, Cesar Silva Monroy, and Ryan Elliott Sandia National Laboratories Leigh Tesfatsion Iowa State University DOE Energy Storage Program Peer Review 2012 Introduction - Motivation for a New Market Design  Need to eliminate market bias of resource classes such as Energy Storage  Need to accommodate new technologies, without the need to change market rules  Move away from resource-centric markets toward service-centric markets

311

Project Funding | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Project Funding Project Funding Project Funding Federal energy projects require funding to generate results. Carefully matching available funding options with specific project needs can make the difference between a stalled, unfunded project and a successful project generating energy and cost savings. The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) supports Federal agencies identify, obtain, and implement project funding for energy projects through: Energy Savings Performance Contracts ESPC ENABLE Process Utility Energy Service Contracts On-Site Renewable Power Purchase Agreements Energy Incentive Programs. Federal agencies can choose the funding options that best fits for their project needs. For an overview of available funding options and strategies, read the FEMP Project Funding Quick Guide.

312

FEMP Renewable Energy Project Assistance Application  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Renewable Energy Project Assistance Application Renewable Energy Project Assistance Application Please complete electronically Request Date: _________________________________________________________________________________________ Federal Agency: _______________________________________________________________________________________ Federal Agency Contact Person Name: ______________________________________________________________________ Phone: ______________________________________________________________________________________________ E-mail: ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Project Name: ________________________________________________________________________________________ Project Location: City _________________________________________ State ___________ Zip Code __________________

313

Strengthening Federal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Jan. 24 Jan. 24 / Administration of George W. Bush, 2007 Executive Order 13423- Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management January 24, 2007 By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and to strengthen the environmental, energy, and transpor- tation management of Federal agencies, it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. Policy. It is the policy of the United States that Federal agencies conduct their environmental, transportation, and en- ergy-related activities under the law in sup- port of their respective missions in an envi- ronmentally, economically and fiscally sound, integrated, continuously improving, efficient, and sustainable manner. Sec. 2. Goals for Agencies. In imple-

314

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

44 44 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 12, 1996 / Notices will be issued this fall in accordance with the reallocation procedures contained in the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA). Under section 442(e) of the HEA, unexpended FWS funds returned to the Secretary must be reallocated to eligible institutions that used at least 10 percent of the total FWS Federal funds granted to the institution to compensate students employed in community services. Because reallocated FWS funds will be distributed on the basis of fair share shortfall criteria, institutions must also have a fair share shortfall to receive these funds. Institutions must use all the reallocated FWS Federal funds to compensate students employed in community services. To ensure

315

Federal Energy Management Program: Greenhouse Gases  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

with an overlying pie chart Government GHG Inventories Review comprehensive GHG inventory and performance data. Executive Order 13514 requires Federal agencies to inventory...

316

Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Recovery Act to Recovery Act to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act on AddThis.com... Energy Savings Performance Contracts ENABLE Utility Energy Service Contracts On-Site Renewable Power Purchase Agreements Energy Incentive Programs Recovery Act Technical Assistance Projects Project Stories Recovery Act The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 included funding for the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) to facilitate the Federal

317

Federal Railroad Administration  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Legislation Legislation Kevin R. Blackwell FRA Hazmat Division Washington, DC Federal Railroad Safety Accountability and Improvement Act of 2007 (FRSAIA)-H.R. 1516 /S. 918 DOT supports this reauthorization bill over H.R. 2095 The provisions of H.R. 2095, while not exactly the same, are very similar to this bill in regard to the core provisions Core provisions: Review and reform the Federal hours of service requirements Establish a new risk reduction program alongside the current existing safety program, and Mandate reporting by States and railroads to the DOT's National Crossing Inventory Federal Railroad Safety Improvement Act of 2007 (FRSIA) - H.R. 2095 Letter from DOT's General Counsel's office addressing DOT's

318

Comprehensive Summary and Analysis of Oral and Written Scoping Comments on the Hawaii Geothermal Project EIS (DOE Review Draft)  

SciTech Connect

This report contains summaries of the oral and written comments received during the scoping process for the Hawaii Geothermal Project (HGP) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Oral comments were presented during public scoping meetings; written comments were solicited at the public scoping meetings and in the ''Advance Notice of Intent'' and ''Notice of Intent'' (published in the ''Federal Register'') to prepare the HGP EIS. This comprehensive summary of scoping inputs provides an overview of the issues that have been suggested for inclusion in the HGP EIS.

None

1992-09-18T23:59:59.000Z

319

Federal Energy Management Program: Utility Contract Competition  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Competition to someone by E-mail Competition to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Utility Contract Competition on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Utility Contract Competition on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Utility Contract Competition on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Utility Contract Competition on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Utility Contract Competition on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Utility Contract Competition on AddThis.com... Energy Savings Performance Contracts ENABLE Utility Energy Service Contracts Types of Contracts Laws & Regulations Best Practices Financing Decrease Interest Buydown & Buyout Approaches Contract Competition Diversify Project Portfolios

320

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery. Progress review number 87  

SciTech Connect

Approximately 30 research projects are summarized in this report. Title of the project, contract number, company or university, award amount, principal investigators, objectives, and summary of technical progress are given for each project. Enhanced oil recovery projects include chemical flooding, gas displacement, and thermal recovery. Most of the research projects though are related to geoscience technology and reservoir characterization.

NONE

1997-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Tri-State Synfuels Project Review: Volume 12. Fluor project status. [Proposed Henderson, Kentucky coal to gasoline plant; engineering  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to document and summarize activities associated with Fluor's efforts on the Tri-State Synfuels Project. The proposed facility was to be coal-to-transport fuels facility located in Henderson, Kentucky. Tri-State Synfuels Company was participating in the project as a partner of the US Department of Energy per terms of a Cooperative Agreement resulting from DOE's synfuel's program solicitation. Fluor's initial work plan called for preliminary engineering and procurement services to the point of commitment for construction for a Sasol Fischer-Tropsch plant. Work proceeded as planned until October 1981 when results of alternative coal-to-methanol studies revealed the economic disadvantage of the Synthol design for US markets. A number of alternative process studies followed to determine the best process configuration. In January 1982 Tri-State officially announced a change from Synthol to a Methanol to Gasoline (MTG) design basis. Further evaluation and cost estimates for the MTG facility eventually led to the conclusion that, given the depressed economic outlook for alternative fuels development, the project should be terminated. Official announcement of cancellation was made on April 13, 1982. At the time of project cancellation, Fluor had completed significant portions of the preliminary engineering effort. Included in this report are descriptions and summaries of Fluor's work during this project. In addition location of key project data and materials is identified and status reports for each operation are presented.

Not Available

1982-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

322

Consent Order, Fluor Federal Services - EA-2000-10 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Services - EA-2000-10 Federal Services - EA-2000-10 Consent Order, Fluor Federal Services - EA-2000-10 July 25, 2000 Price-Anderson Enforcement Consent Order issued to Fluor Federal Services related to Quality Problems at the Tank Farm Waste Remediation System at the Hanford Site, (EA-2000-10) This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of two internal investigations conducted by Fluor Hanford, Inc. and CH2M Hanford Group, Inc. in which Fluor Federal Services (FFS) jointly participated. Collectively, the two investigations examined the facts and circumstances surrounding quality problems with the procurement of safety class piping for the W-314 Project at the Tank Farm Waste Remediation System and reviewed the adequacy and effectiveness of FFS's procurement quality

323

"FEMP Support Through Initial Proposal Review for Contractor-Identified Super ESPC Project"  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 " "FEMP Support Through Initial Proposal Review for Contractor-Identified Super ESPC Project" "Task #","Task Title","Work Scope","Deliverable","Agency Requirements" " " "Phase One Activities - Project Planning" "1-1","Energy Potential Assessment","FEMP Services will analyze all available information to determine if Agency specified project site is a good candidate for ESPC. FEMP Services will provide recommendations as needed to improve project economics for Super ESPC/recommend other project implementation strategies","Telecon advice and recommendations","Agency will provide site data requested by FEMP Services staff. Typical data requested is 1-2 years of monthly utility bill, past audits, building list and maintenance records, facility condition assessments."

324

Request for Information on Permitting of Transmission Lines: Federal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Request for Information on Permitting of Transmission Lines: Request for Information on Permitting of Transmission Lines: Federal Register Notice Volume 77, No. 38 - Feb. 27, 2012 Request for Information on Permitting of Transmission Lines: Federal Register Notice Volume 77, No. 38 - Feb. 27, 2012 The Department of Energy's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability requested information on questions related to permitting of transmission lines. Infrastructure projects - such as high voltage, long distance, electric transmission facilities - often involve multiple Federal, State, local and Tribal authorizations and are subject to a wide array of processes and procedural requirements in order to obtain all necessary permits and other authorizations. Delays in securing required statutory reviews, permits, and consultations can threaten the completion

325

Request for Information on Permitting of Transmission Lines: Federal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Request for Information on Permitting of Transmission Lines: Request for Information on Permitting of Transmission Lines: Federal Register Notice Volume 77, No. 38 - Feb. 27, 2012 Request for Information on Permitting of Transmission Lines: Federal Register Notice Volume 77, No. 38 - Feb. 27, 2012 The Department of Energy's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability requested information on questions related to permitting of transmission lines. Infrastructure projects - such as high voltage, long distance, electric transmission facilities - often involve multiple Federal, State, local and Tribal authorizations and are subject to a wide array of processes and procedural requirements in order to obtain all necessary permits and other authorizations. Delays in securing required statutory reviews, permits, and consultations can threaten the completion

326

Analysis of the Costs of a Backlog Project in Response to Recommendation 2 of the 2004 Archives and History Office Program Review Committee Report  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Analysis of the Costs of a Backlog Project in Response to Recommendation 2 of the 2004 Archives and History Office Program Review Committee Report

O'Hara, Laura

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

327

Highlights of the solar total energy systems, distributed collector systems, and research and development projects. Semiannual review, 26-27 January 1976, Atlanta, Georgia  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The highlights of the ERDA Solar Thermal Branch Semiannual Review held in Atlanta, Georgia, on January 26-27, 1976, are presented. Status and plans for Total Energy Systems, Distributed Collectors, and Research and Development Projects are reviewed. (WHK)

Latta, A.F.

1976-03-26T23:59:59.000Z

328

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 47 / Friday, March 8, 1996 / Notices Comment date: March 18, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E at the end of this notice. 13. Benjamin F. Montoya [Docket No. ID-2945-000] Take notice that on February 23, 1996, Benjamin F. Montoya (Applicant) tendered for filing an application under Section 305(b) of the Federal Power Act to hold the following positions: President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Public Service Company of New Mexico, a New Mexico corporation Director, Northwest Corporation Comment date: March 15, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E at the end of this notice. 14. Montana Power Company [Docket No. TX96-6-000] Take notice that on February 26, 1996, Montana Power Company (MPC) tendered for filing an application

329

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

901 901 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 1, 2004 / Notices As a result of this dispute, the SLA requested the Secretary of Education to convene a Federal arbitration panel to hear this complaint. A panel was convened, and a hearing on this matter was held on May 13, 2002. Arbitration Panel Decision The arbitration panel heard the following issue: whether the Army's alleged failure to negotiate with the SLA in good faith for the full food services and dining facility attendant services contract at Ft. Campbell, Kentucky, constituted a violation of the Act (20 U.S.C. 107 et seq.) and the implementing regulations in 34 CFR part 395. After considering the evidence presented, the majority of the panel ruled that the Act clearly covers all

330

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

25 25 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 224 / Thursday, November 20, 1997 / Notices implementation from 8:30 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. For the rest of the day, the Council will meet with representatives from the State School-to-Work Implementation Grantees in small groups to discuss and determine strategies for addressing State sustainability issues. The meeting will close with a summary of the day's meeting and a discussion of future actions. Public Participation: The meeting on Tuesday, December 2, 1997, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. at the Renaissance Mayflower Hotel, will be open to the public. Seats will be reserved for the media. Individuals with disabilities in need of special accommodations should contact the Designated Federal Official (DFO), listed below, at least seven (7)

331

Completed Projects | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Completed Projects Completed Projects Project Assessment (OPA) OPA Home About Project Management SC Projects Review Dates (updated November 2013) Project Construction Photos Completed Projects Current Projects Other Links SC Federal Project Directors (FPD) and FPD Resources Contact Information Project Assessment U.S. Department of Energy SC-28/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4840 F: (301) 903-8520 E: sc.opa@science.doe.gov Project Construction Photos Completed Projects Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Photos of completed SC projects Advanced Photon Source External link Building 51 and Bevatron D&D .pdf file (1.1MB) LHC ATLAS .pdf file (322KB) LHC CMS .pdf file (166KB) Linac Coherent Light Source .pdf file (4.6MB)

332

Ongoing Projects | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Current Projects Current Projects Project Assessment (OPA) OPA Home About Project Management SC Projects Review Dates (updated November 2013) Project Construction Photos Completed Projects Current Projects Other Links SC Federal Project Directors (FPD) and FPD Resources Contact Information Project Assessment U.S. Department of Energy SC-28/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4840 F: (301) 903-8520 E: sc.opa@science.doe.gov Project Construction Photos Current Projects Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Photos of current SC Projects 12 GeV CEBAF Upgrade .pdf file (3.2MB) Daya Bay .pdf file (1.0MB) National Spherical Torus Experiment (NSTX) .pdf file (841KB) National Synchrotron Light Source II (NSLS II) .pdf file (6.4MB)

333

Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 38/Tuesday, February 26, 2013 ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Security Strategy,'' 2011 ''Cyberspace Policy Review,'' ''International ... Federal Register/Vol. ... including telecommunications, energy, financial services ...

2013-02-26T23:59:59.000Z

334

Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Renewable Energy Renewable Energy Working Group to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group on AddThis.com... Energy-Efficient Products Technology Deployment Renewable Energy Federal Requirements Renewable Resources & Technologies Project Planning & Implementation Project Assistance Resource Maps & Screening Tools

335

BPA-Solicited Technical Review of "Echo Meadows Project Winter Artificial Recharge: Final Report for 2001 Baseline", Technical Report 2004.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The purpose of this report was to provide, at BPA's request, a technical review of interim products received for Project 2001-015-00 under contract 6925. BPA sometimes solicits technical reviews for Fish and Wildlife products or issues where outside expertise is required. External review of complex project deliverables assures BPA as a funding agency that the contractor is continuing with scientifically-credible experimental techniques envisioned in the original proposal. If the project's methodology proves feasible, there could be potential applications beyond the project area to similar situations in the Columbia Basin. The Experiment involves artificial flooding during high flow periods and a determination of the portion of the return flows that end up in the Umatilla River during low flow months and within acceptable water quality parameters (e.g., low temperature, few contaminants). Flooding could be a critical water source for aquatic organisms at times of the year when flows in the lower reaches of the Umatilla River are low and water is warmer than would be desired. The experiment was proposed to test whether 'this process, recharges the shallow aquifers of the old flood plain, for natural filtration through the alluvial soils as it returns to the Umatilla River, cleaner and cooler (about 50 degree Fahrenheit) five to six month later (about July and August) substantially cooling the river and [making it] more beneficial to anadromous [fish]'. A substantial amount of preliminary data had been collected and preliminary results were submitted in an interim report 'Echo Meadows Project Winter Artificial Recharge: Final Report for 2001 Baseline (December 2002)'. A substantial amount of addition funding was provided for the last cycle of flooding (Phases II) and final analyses of the full compliment of data collected over the life of the contract (Phase III). Third party scientific review may assist the contractor in producing a higher quality Final Report with completion of the final 2 phases of the project.

Morgan, David

2004-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

336

Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

review of the Phase I DP for the West Valley Demonstration Project, Rev. I (Reference 1). DOE submitted responses to the other 38 of the 44 RAIs to NRC on August 13, 2009 (Reference 3). Enclosed are 20 paper copies of the RAI response package along with 20 compact disks. Each compact disk contains an electronic copy of the six RAI responses and two calculationQ t Dr. Keith 1. McConnell-3- September 16, 2009 For Further Information Please note that DOE's RAI responses and the proposed decommissioning approach are based on the preferred alternative in the Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement for

unknown authors

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

337

Energy Smart Federal Partnership: Your Steps to Energy Savings  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Smart Federal Partnership: Your Steps to Energy Savings Energy Smart Federal Partnership: Your Steps to Energy Savings 1. Review your facilities and commitment to efficiency investments  Communicate with key facilities staff including the people that will approve the energy project budgets.  Determine if the energy-saving opportunities meet your agency's requirements for investment (such as project payback) and are likely to receive funding approval.  Contact your local serving utility or utilities to discuss your plans and understand the process for obtaining financial assistance (incentives). If you are unsure who your serving utility is, please contact BPA and we will help. Another good resource for locating utilities can be found our website: http://www.bpa.gov/Energy/N/UtilityLocator.cfm.

338

Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Fleets Federal Fleets The Federal Fleet Program Overview outlines FEMP services and assistance available to Federal fleet managers to increase the use of alternative fuels and advanced vehicles. FEMP's Sustainable Federal Fleets website provides guidance and assistance to help implement Federal legislative and regulatory requirements mandating reduced petroleum consumption and increased alternative fuel use. FEMP's efforts include assisting agencies with implementing and managing energy-efficient and alternative fuel vehicles and facilitating a coordinated effort to reduce petroleum consumption and increase alternative fuel use annually. Content on Sustainable Federal Fleets spans Federal requirements and reporting compliance, alternative fuels and advanced vehicles, fleet performance data, analysis services, information resources, and FEMP contacts.

339

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy Efficiency...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Energy Efficiency Acquisition Guidance and Requirements for Residential Electric Resistance Water Heaters to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program:...

340

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy Efficiency...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Guidance and Requirements for Fluorescent Tube Lamps to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy Efficiency Acquisition Guidance and Requirements...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Interagency Energy...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

About the Program Site Map Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Interagency Energy Management Task Force to someone by...

342

Project Construction Team | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Project Construction Team Project Construction Team Project Construction Team October 16, 2013 - 5:06pm Addthis Photo of two men reviewing a large print document. Both men are wearing construction hats and bright vests. A construction team reviews plans for a 1.9 megawatt methane power generator for a U.S. Marine Corps landfill gas-to-energy project. Assembling the right project construction team is crucial and begins with the request for proposal (RFP). Federal agencies create and RFP for construction services using construction documents developed during the final stage of building design. Construction documents are the blueprints on which every project is built and will be used to generate bids for the construction phase of the project. Renewable energy will either be specified in detail in the

343

NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM DOE/CX-00088 I. Project Title: CH2f"JHill Plateau Remediation Company -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10 Number: 10 Number: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM DOE/CX-00088 I. Project Title: CH2f"JHill Plateau Remediation Company - Cleanup Actions, December 2012 to December 2013 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions. e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company (PRC) will be conducting cleanup actions on the Hanford Site in accordance with the categorical exclusion (CX) referenced in 10 CFR 1021, B, CX B6.1 ''Cleanup actions". PRC Projects include all those identified Sections . 3 and J.l4 of the PRC Contract, DE-AC06-08RL14788. Small-scale, short-term cleanup actions, under RCRA, Atomic Energy Act, or other

344

Casual factors of increased project risk : a review of four in-flight anomalies  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Risk management is an essential component any project. Traditional tools of risk management, however, tend to focus solely on the three traditional project elements-cost, schedule, and technical-ignoring the broader ...

Dal Santo, Rita M. (Rita Marie)

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

345

Energy Savings Performance Contract Federal Financing Specialists |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Savings Performance Contract Federal Financing Specialists Energy Savings Performance Contract Federal Financing Specialists Energy Savings Performance Contract Federal Financing Specialists October 7, 2013 - 1:38pm Addthis The Federal Energy Management Program's Federal financing specialists (FFSs) help agencies launch energy savings performance contract (ESPC) projects. These specialists assist agencies by: Explaining performance contracting to site staff and management Determining whether a ESPC project is feasible Forming an agency acquisition team Determining agency project decision makers Partnering with energy service companies. Contact a FEMP FFS below to get started with an ESPC project. Contacts Name States Served Scott Wolf 360-866-9163 Serving: Montana, Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Minnesota, New Mexico, Alaska, Washington, Oregon, Idaho, California, Nevada, Arizona, Hawaii, North Marianas, Palau, Guam, American Samoa Regions

346

Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Renewable  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Renewable Energy Project Funding to someone by E-mail Renewable Energy Project Funding to someone by E-mail Share Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Renewable Energy Project Funding on Facebook Tweet about Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Renewable Energy Project Funding on Twitter Bookmark Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Renewable Energy Project Funding on Google Bookmark Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Renewable Energy Project Funding on Delicious Rank Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Renewable Energy Project Funding on Digg Find More places to share Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Renewable Energy Project Funding on AddThis.com...

347

Federal Register Notices Archive  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Federal Register Notice of TIP 2009 Competition ...more. White Papers: Federal Register Notice Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request ...

2011-04-12T23:59:59.000Z

348

Federal Register Notices  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Federal Register Notice of 2010 TIP Competition ...more. White Papers: Federal Register Notice Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request ...

2011-04-25T23:59:59.000Z

349

Review of project definition studies of possible on-site uses of superconducting super collider assets and facilities. Final report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document reports on the results of a peer review and evaluation of studies made of potential uses of assets from the terminated Superconducting Super Collider (SSC) project. These project definition studies focused on nine areas of use of major assets and facilities at the SSC site near Waxahachie, Texas. The studies were undertaken as part of the effort to maximize the value of the investment made in the SSC and were supported by two sets of grants, one to the Texas National Research Laboratory Commission (TNRLC) and the second to various universities and other institutions for studies of ideas raised by a public call for expressions of interest. The Settlement Agreement, recently signed by the Department of Energy (DOE) and TNRLC, provides for a division of SSC property. As part of the goal of maximizing the value of the SSC investment, the findings contained in this report are thus addressed to officials in both the Department and TNRLC. In addition, this review had several other goals: to provide constructive feedback to those doing the studies; to judge the benefits and feasibility (including funding prospects) of the projects studied; and to help worthy projects become reality by matching projects with possible funding sources.

NONE

1994-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

350

Review of project definition studies of possible on-site uses of superconducting super collider assets and facilities  

SciTech Connect

This document reports on the results of a peer review and evaluation of studies made of potential uses of assets from the terminated Superconducting Super Collider (SSC) project. These project definition studies focused on nine areas of use of major assets and facilities at the SSC site near Waxahachie, Texas. The studies were undertaken as part of the effort to maximize the value of the investment made in the SSC and were supported by two sets of grants, one to the Texas National Research Laboratory Commission (TNRLC) and the second to various universities and other institutions for studies of ideas raised by a public call for expressions of interest. The Settlement Agreement, recently signed by the Department of Energy (DOE) and TNRLC, provides for a division of SSC property. As part of the goal of maximizing the value of the SSC investment, the findings contained in this report are thus addressed to officials in both the Department and TNRLC. In addition, this review had several other goals: to provide constructive feedback to those doing the studies; to judge the benefits and feasibility (including funding prospects) of the projects studied; and to help worthy projects become reality by matching projects with possible funding sources.

1994-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

351

W-519 Sagebrush Mitigation Project FY-2004 Final Review and Status  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes activities conducted as mitigation for loss of sagebrush-steppe habitats due to Project W-519, the construction of the infrastructure for the Tank Waste Remediation System Vitrification Plant. The focus of this report is to provide a review and final status of mitigation actions performed through FY2004. Data collected since FY1999 have been included where appropriate. The Mitigation Action Plan (MAP) for Project W-519 prescribed three general actions to be performed as mitigation for the disturbance of approximately 40 ha (100 acres) of mature sagebrush-steppe habitat. These actions included: (1) transplanting approximately 130,000 sagebrush seedlings on the Fitzner-Eberhardt Arid Lands Ecology Reserve (ALE); (2) rectification of the new transmission line corridor via seeding with native grasses and sagebrush; and (3) research on native plant species with a goal of increasing species diversity in future mitigation or restoration actions. Nearly 130,000 Wyoming big sagebrush seedlings where planted on ALE during FY2000 and FY2001. About 39,000 of those seedlings were burned during the 24-Command Fire of June 2000. The surviving and subsequent replanting has resulted in about 91,000 seedlings that were planted across four general areas on ALE. A 50% survival rate at any monitoring period was defined as the performance standard in the MAP for this project. Data collected in 2004 indicate that of the over 5000 monitored plants, 51.1% are still alive, and of those the majority are thriving and blooming. These results support the potential for natural recruitment and the ultimate goal of wildlife habitat replacement. Thus, the basic performance standard for sagebrush survival within the habitat compensation planting has been met. Monitoring activities conducted in 2004 indicate considerable variation in seedling survival depending on the type of plant material, site conditions, and to a lesser extent, treatments performed at the time of planting. The principle findings include: (1) a clear indication that in most settings, bare-root seedling survival is considerably higher than tubling survival; (2) we can expect low plant survival at sites with a high cover of large native bunchgrasses--especially bluebunch wheatgrass; (3) mycorrhizal root treatments appeared to increase growth and survival at the Coppice Dune and 98-Burn Undisturbed sites, but appeared to have little effect at the 98-Burn Disturbed, 111-Road Sitanion, or Cold Creek sites; (4) use of a hydrogel dip at planting increases survival of bare-root plants compared to dipping roots in plain water; (5) reducing leaf area via clipping after planting did not increase survival of bare-root plants; (6) seedlings planted on a south-aspect hillside at the Lower Cold Creek planting area had higher survival than seedlings planted on the hilltop or northern-aspects although these survival rates were lower than the survival rate down on the flats at this same location. Rectification of the transmission line corridor occurred in early March 2001, with the broadcast seeding of Sandberg's bluegrass and sagebrush. Success criteria for this site-of-disturbance rectification required a grass establishment after four years with greater than 25% total canopy cover with 60% of the plant cover from planted species (DOE 1998). This planting met the total canopy criterion but failed the criterion of 60% relative coverage of planted species. Although the performance standard was not met, the planting is not necessarily a failure; the communities on the tower pads appear to be developing toward the desired end state. We feel that there are no reasonable mitigative actions that can be taken at this time that would significantly alter or speed up the plant community development on these sites. In fact, most options, such as overseeding, may cause damage to the currently establishing communities on those sites.

Durham, Robin E.; Sackschewsky, Michael R.

2004-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

352

Renewable Energy Project Assistance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Project Assistance Renewable Energy Project Assistance October 7, 2013 - 9:41am Addthis The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) provides ongoing renewable energy project...

353

Federal Railroad Administration  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Update Du Update Du Jour Department Of Energy Transportation External Coordination Working Group Meeting Albuquerque, New Mexico April 21-23, 2004 Presented by Kevin R. Blackwell Radioactive Materials Program Manager Federal Railroad Administration Federal Railroad Administration Dedicated Train Study- Report to Congress FRA' s Research & Development Office (as lead on the study) received a draft final report from the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (VNTSC) in late November, 2003. Editorial corrections were made and a final draft dated February, 2004 was provided to FRA. Final Draft Report FRA has been reviewed and been sent to FRA Administrator for clearance and forwarding to DOT OST. FRA has already "Officially Coordinated" and briefed DOT OST and

354

Project  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Exploring the Standard Model Exploring the Standard Model       You've heard a lot about the Standard Model and the pieces are hopefully beginning to fall into place. However, even a thorough understanding of the Standard Model is not the end of the story but the beginning. By exploring the structure and details of the Standard Model we encounter new questions. Why do the most fundamental particles have the particular masses we observe? Why aren't they all symmetric? How is the mass of a particle related to the masses of its constituents? Is there any other way of organizing the Standard Model? The activities in this project will elucidate but not answer our questions. The Standard Model tells us how particles behave but not necessarily why they do so. The conversation is only beginning. . . .

355

NSLS-II Project Pages  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

NSLS-II Project Pages Project Management Team Project Schedule Integrated Project Team (IPT) Monthly Status Meetings Advisory Committees Project Reviews Documents NSLS-II...

356

Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Integrated Waste Treatment Uinit Contractor Operational Readiness Review, June 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor Contractor Operational Readiness Review June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 4.0 Results ................................................................................................................................................... 2

357

Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Integrated Waste Treatment Uinit Contractor Operational Readiness Review, June 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Contractor Contractor Operational Readiness Review June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 4.0 Results ................................................................................................................................................... 2

358

Federal Energy Management Program: Distributed-scale Renewable Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Distributed-scale Distributed-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Smaller than 10 MWs) to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Distributed-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Smaller than 10 MWs) on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Distributed-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Smaller than 10 MWs) on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Distributed-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Smaller than 10 MWs) on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Distributed-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Smaller than 10 MWs) on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Distributed-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Smaller than 10 MWs) on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Distributed-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Smaller than 10 MWs) on

359

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2266 2266 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 86 / Thursday, May 3, 2001 / Notices The States eligible to apply for incentive grant awards, and the amount they are eligible to receive are Florida, $2,645,125; Indiana, $1,308,726; Kentucky, $1,400,631; Texas, $3,000,000; Utah, $882,167; and Vermont $843,351. The six eligible States must submit their applications for incentive funding to the Department of Labor by June 18, 2001. As set forth in the provisions of WIA section 503(b)(2), and 20 CFR 666.220(b), the application must include assurances that: A. The legislature of the State was consulted with respect to the development of the application. B. The application was approved by the Governor, the eligible agency for adult education (as defined in section 203 of WIA), and the State agency

360

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

07 07 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2004 / Notices assessment; and (f) environmental statistics. Process and Deadline for Submitting Nominations Any interested person or organization may nominate individuals qualified in the areas of expertise described above to serve on the Subcommittee. Nominations should be submitted in electronic format through the Form for Nominating Individuals to Panels of the EPA Science Advisory Board provided on the SAB Web site, http:// www.epa.gov/sab. The form can be accessed through a link on the blue navigational bar on the SAB Web site, http://www.epa.gov/sab. To be considered, all nominations must include the information required on that form. Anyone who is unable to submit nominations using this form, and any

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 17 / Thursday, January 25, 1996 / Notices Department of Energy Organization Act (Public Law 95-91), and rules and regulations issued in implementation of those Acts. Further information regarding this Advisory Board may be obtained from Rachel Murphy Samuel at (202) 586- 3279. Issued in Washington, DC, on January 18, 1996. JoAnne Whitman, Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer. [FR Doc. 96-1197 Filed 1-24-96; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450-01-P Alternative Strategies for the Long- Term Management and Use of Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride AGENCY: Department of Energy ACTION: Notice of Intent (NOI). SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) announces its intent to prepare a programmatic environmental impact statement (PEIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act

362

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

21 21 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 226 / Friday, November 23, 2001 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY National Energy Technology Laboratory; Notice of Availability of a Financial Assistance Solicitation AGENCY: National Energy Technology Laboratory, Department of Energy (DOE). ACTION: Notice of availability of a financial assistance solicitation. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the intent to issue Financial Assistance Solicitation No. DE-PS26-02NT41423 entitled ''Black Liquor/Biomass Gasification Technology Support Research and Development.'' It is the intent of the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), on behalf of the Office of Industrial Technologies (OIT) in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, to solicit the submission of

363

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 220 / Friday, November 14, 2003 / Notices 1 Because the plants' refueling schedules determine the availability for lead assembly use, Duke Power Company has submitted a license amendment request to the NRC to allow irradiation of MOX lead assemblies at Catawba. The SA also analyzes the use of the McGuire Nuclear Station (McGuire) in North Carolina, which could be used in lieu of Catawba, if a license amendment request were submitted and approved. SUMMARY: The Leader, Regulatory Information Management Group, Office of the Chief Information Officer, invites comments on the proposed information collection requests as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before January

364

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

57 57 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 22, 2005 / Notices shall include a detailed explanation of the dispute. Upon the other Manager's receipt of such notice, that Manager shall have 15 working days to provide to the disputing Party a written answer to the notice and explanation. The notice and answer, including any exhibits thereto, shall be the Record of Dispute. After such 15-day period has expired, the Managers shall make their best efforts to resolve the dispute within 20 working days. C. If the Managers do not resolve the dispute within 20 days, the dispute will be elevated to FWS's Regional Director and DOE's Rocky Flats Manager or successor. Within 30 working days of receiving the Record of Dispute, they shall confer and attempt to resolve the

365

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

13 13 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 223 / Friday, November 19, 1999 / Notices numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 15. The EPA would like to solicit comments to: (i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (iv) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated electronic,

366

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

78 78 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 17, 2005 / Notices requirements and practices for institutions participating in the Title IV, Higher Education Act (HEA) programs. The public is alerted that this package is a request for an extension of a currently approved collection. Until the anticipated reauthorization of the Higher Education Act and any resulting changes to the implementing regulations, the existing paperwork collection is simply extended, rather than revised. Requests for copies of the proposed information collection request may be accessed from http://edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting the ''Browse Pending Collections'' link and by clicking on link number 2853. When you access the information collection, click on ''Download Attachments'' to view.

367

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

04 04 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 130 / Monday, July 8, 2002 / Notices Background The claim in question arose when the Department's Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education (Assistant Secretary) issued a program determination letter (PDL) on March 26, 1997. The PDL demanded a refund of $1,846,718 of funds provided to the PRDE for school years 1991-92 and 1992-93 under Chapter 1 of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 2701 et seq. (1988)). Specifically, the Assistant Secretary found that the PRDE had used Chapter 1 funds to assess the educational needs of all public and private school children in violation of statutory and regulatory requirements that permitted the use of those funds only for programs designed to meet the

368

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

90 90 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 173 / Thursday, September 5, 1996 / Notices written comments concerning (1) the scope of the EIS, (2) the issues the EIS should address, and (3) the alternatives the EIS should analyze. Please address written comments to Mr. Grainger at the address indicated above. These comments should be postmarked by November 1, 1996 to ensure full consideration. Organizations and individuals wishing to participate in the public meeting can call 1-800-242-8269 between 8:30 AM and 5:00 PM Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, or submit their requests to Mr. Grainger at the address indicated above. DOE requests that anyone who wishes to speak at the scoping meeting preregister by contacting Mr. Grainger, either by phone or in writing. Preregistration

369

Federal Programs  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Local government agencies are often the first places where homeowners seek financial assistance for mortgage relief. These requests come at a time when municipalities are facing increasing budgetary demands and diminishing revenues. With unemployment at an all time high and worsening economic conditions, the foreclosure crisis is not likely to abate in the near future. Due to the deep and spreading nationwide foreclosure crisis, Congress has enacted legislation that authorizes agencies in the federal government and national organizations to develop or expand programs to intervene and to assist borrowers by revising and guaranteeing loan agreements. Additionally, large financial institutions and banks are absorbing assets of failed entities and creating programs for homeowners to work out new loan terms. This document provides summaries of the major program offerings to borrowers by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development ( HUD), Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, NeighborWorks, large banks, and financial institutions that have clients nation-wide.

Hope For Homeowners Program

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

370

EPRI (2004, 2006) Ground-Motion Model (GMM) Review Project: Shear Wave Velocity Measurements at Seismic Recording Stations  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report presents the results of site characterization studies for the EPRI (2004, 2006) Ground-Motion Model Review Project. The primary purpose of this investigation was to develop S-wave velocity (VS) profiles to a depth of 30 m, or more, and to estimate the average shear wave velocity of the upper 30 m (VS30) at thirty three (33) seismic instrument sites located in the Central and Eastern United States. Results are presented in individual seismic recording station site ...

2013-04-15T23:59:59.000Z

371

Review Dates (updated October 2013) | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Review Review Dates (updated November 2013) Project Assessment (OPA) OPA Home About Project Management SC Projects Review Dates (updated November 2013) Project Construction Photos Other Links SC Federal Project Directors (FPD) and FPD Resources Contact Information Project Assessment U.S. Department of Energy SC-28/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4840 F: (301) 903-8520 E: sc.opa@science.doe.gov SC Projects Review Dates (updated November 2013) Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Project Location Date National Synchrotron Light Source-II (NSLS-II) Mini Review GTN 12/4/13 12 GeV Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility (CEBAF) Upgrade Mini Review GTN 12/9/13 National Synchrotron Light Source-II (NSLS-II) BNL 1/29-30/14

372

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: Pacific Northwest Smart Grid Demonstration Project - Ron Melton, Battelle Memorial Institute  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Overview Overview Ron Melton, Ph.D., Project Director Don Hammerstrom, Ph.D., Principal Investigator Battelle, Pacific Northwest Division Presented at DOE-OE Smart Grid R&D Peer Review June 8, 2012 PNWD-SA-9876 Pacific Northwest Demonstration Project What: * $178M, ARRA-funded, 5-year demonstration * 60,000 metered customers in 5 states Why: * Quantify costs and benefits * Develop communications protocol * Develop standards * Facilitate integration of wind and other renewables Who: Led by Battelle and partners including BPA, 11 utilities, 2 universities, and 5 vendors 2 Project Basics 3 Transactive Control Operational objectives Manage peak demand Facilitate renewable resources Address constrained resources Improve system reliability and efficiency Select economical

373

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: AEP Ohio gridSMART Demonstration Project - Karen Sloneker, Columbus Southern Power (AEP)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Program Peer Review Meeting AEP Ohio gridSMART ® Demonstration Project Karen Sloneker AEP Ohio gridSMART Project Director ® December 2008 AEP Ohio gridSMART ® Demonstration Project Objectives * To build an integrated secure smart grid infrastructure. * Attract, educate, enlist and retain consumers using innovative business models that provide tools to reduce costs, consumption and peak demand. * Gather data on technology and smart grid business models to forecast national impact. Life-cycle Funding 2010 - 2013 $73,660,317 Technical Scope (Insert graphic here) * 110,000 AMI meters and associated infrastructure * Consumer Managed Energy Technology (experimental tariffs, consumer programs, web portal; smart appliances, and plug-in electric vehicles) * Innovative Demand Management * Distribution Automation and Reliability

374

Status Review of Wildlife Mitigation at 14 of 27 Major Hydroelectric Projects in Idaho, 1983-1984 Final Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act and wildlife and their habitats in the Columbia River Basin and to compliance with the Program, the wildlife mitigation status reports coordination with resource agencies and Indian Tribes. developed the Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program development, operation, and maintenance of hydroelectric projects on existing agreements; and past, current, and proposed wildlife factual review and documentation of existing information on wildlife meet the requirements of Measure 1004(b)(l) of the Program. The mitigation, enhancement, and protection activities were considered. In mitigate for the losses to those resources resulting from the purpose of these wildlife mitigation status reports is to provide a resources at some of the Columbia River Basin hydroelectric projects the river and its tributaries. To accomplish this goal, the Council were written with the cooperation of project operators, and in within Idaho.

Martin, Robert C.; Mehrhoff, L.A.

1985-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

375

Renewable Project Overview  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Project Overview Project Overview Federal Utility Partnership Working Group 5/6/09 Chandra Shah, NREL 303-384-7557, chandra.shah@nrel.gov National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future Presentation Overview Federal and utility renewable requirements Power Purchase Agreements (PPA) Western Area Power Administration Federal Renewable Program UESC and renewables * Participating in utility renewable programs - Opportunity Announcement process Renewable projects implemented using appropriations National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future Biomass Resource

376

Solar Photovoltaic Financing: Deployment by Federal Government Agencies  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The goal of this report is to examine how federal agencies can finance on-site PV projects. It explains state-level cash incentives available, the importance of solar renewable energy certificate revenues (in certain markets), existing financing structures, as well as innovative financing structures being used by federal agencies to deploy on-site PV. Specific examples from the DOD, DOE, and other federal agencies are highlighted to explain federal project financing in detail.

Cory, K.; Coggeshall, C.; Coughlin, J.; Kreycik, C.

2009-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

377

Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Outreach  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Outreach to someone by E-mail Outreach to someone by E-mail Share Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Outreach on Facebook Tweet about Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Outreach on Twitter Bookmark Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Outreach on Google Bookmark Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Outreach on Delicious Rank Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Outreach on Digg Find More places to share Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Outreach on AddThis.com... Home Introduction Assessing Renewable Energy Options Planning, Programming, & Budgeting Project Funding Building Design Project Construction Commissioning Operations & Maintenance

378

Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Resources  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Resources to someone by E-mail Resources to someone by E-mail Share Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Resources on Facebook Tweet about Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Resources on Twitter Bookmark Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Resources on Google Bookmark Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Resources on Delicious Rank Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Resources on Digg Find More places to share Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Resources on AddThis.com... Home Introduction Assessing Renewable Energy Options Planning, Programming, & Budgeting Project Funding Building Design Project Construction Commissioning Operations & Maintenance

379

Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Training  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Training to someone by E-mail Training to someone by E-mail Share Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Training on Facebook Tweet about Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Training on Twitter Bookmark Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Training on Google Bookmark Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Training on Delicious Rank Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Training on Digg Find More places to share Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Training on AddThis.com... Home Introduction Assessing Renewable Energy Options Planning, Programming, & Budgeting Project Funding Building Design Project Construction Commissioning Operations & Maintenance

380

Parker-Davis Project  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Parker-Davis Project Remarketing Effort Reference Material Decision to Apply EPAMP Federal Register Notices Firm Electric Service Amendment Process Resource Pool & Applicant...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Projects Not Reviewed: U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Systems for High Temperature, Low Relative Humidity Polymer-Type Membranes Andrew Herring Colorado School of Mines 640 | FY 2012 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report...

382

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations - Poster Session 1 (Day 1): National Lab Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 28, 2012.

383

Review and Selection of Research Projects | U.S. DOE Office of...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Merit Review Policies Early Career Research Opportunities in High Energy...

384

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Federal Energy Management Program Technical Assistance Project 281 Solar Hot Water Application Assessment for U.S. Army IMCOM-Southeast Region  

SciTech Connect

The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 requires installations (EISA) to install solar systems of sufficient capacity to provide 30% of service hot water in new construction and renovations where cost-effective. However, installations are struggling with how to implement solar hot water, and while several installations are installing solar hot water on a limited basis, paybacks remain long. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) was tasked to address this issue to help determine how best to implement solar hot water projects. This documents discusses the results of that project.

Russo, Bryan J.; Chvala, William D.

2010-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

385

Terms of Reference CSLF Projects Interaction and Review Team (PIRT) Background  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

One of the main instruments to help the CSLF achieve its goals will be through the recognition of CSLF projects. By responding to the gaps and priorities identified in the CSLF Technology Roadmap, the CSLF projects will be a key element in generating and exploiting the knowledge that may lead to improved carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies. It is therefore of major importance to have appropriate mechanisms within the CSLF for the recognition, assessment and dissemination of projects and their results for the benefit of the CSLF and its Members. To meet this need the CSLF has created an advisory body, the PIRT, which reports to the

unknown authors

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

386

Federal Assistance Program Quarterly Project Progress Report. Geothermal Energy Program: Information Dissemination, Public Outreach, and Technical Analysis Activities. Reporting Period: January 1 - March 31, 2001 [Final report  

SciTech Connect

The final report of the accomplishments of the geothermal energy program: information dissemination, public outreach and technical analysis activities by the project team consisting of the Geo-Heat Center, Geothermal Resources Council, Geothermal Education Office, Geothermal Energy Association and the Washington State University Energy Program.

Lund, John W.

2002-03-22T23:59:59.000Z

387

A History and Review of the Global Soil Wetness Project (GSWP)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Global Soil Wetness Project (GSWP) is an international land surface modeling research effort involving dataset production, validation, model comparison, and scientific investigation in the areas of land surface hydrology and climatology. GSWP ...

Paul A. Dirmeyer

2011-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

388

Independent review of estimated load reductions for PJM's small customer load response pilot project  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of Estimated Load Reductions for PJMs Small Customer Loadof Estimated Load Reductions for PJMs Small Customer LoadResponse Pilot Project Prepared for PJM Interconnection, LLC

Heffner, G.; Moezzi, M.; Goldman, C.

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

389

Annual DOE active solar heating and cooling contractors' review meeting. Premeeting proceedings and project summaries  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Ninety-three project summaries are presented which discuss the following aspects of active solar heating and cooling: Rankine solar cooling systems; absorption solar cooling systems; desiccant solar cooling systems; solar heat pump systems; solar hot water systems; special projects (such as the National Solar Data Network, hybrid solar thermal/photovoltaic applications, and heat transfer and water migration in soils); administrative/management support; and solar collector, storage, controls, analysis, and materials technology. (LEW)

None,

1981-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

390

Peer Review of the Hot Dry Rock Project at Fenton Hill, New Mexico  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report briefly describes the history of the hot dry rock experiment project conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy and Los Alamos National Laboratory at Fenton Hill, New Mexico, from about 1971 through 1995. The authors identify the primary lessons learned and techniques developed during the course of the Fenton Hill project, and summarize the extent to which these technologies have been transferred to the U.S. geothermal industry.

None

1998-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

391

EERE: Federal Energy Management Program Home Page  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

The U.S. Department of Energy's Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) works with key individuals to accomplish energy change within organizations, by bringing expertise from all levels of project and policy implementation, to enable Federal agencies to meet energy-related goals and to provide energy leadership to the country. The U.S. Department of Energy's Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) works with key individuals to accomplish energy change within organizations, by bringing expertise from all levels of project and policy implementation, to enable Federal agencies to meet energy-related goals and to provide energy leadership to the country. FEMP SERVICE AREAS Image of the capitol building. Laws, Regulations, & Reporting Meet Energy Goals and Regulatory Requirements Image of a building. Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Design, Operate, and Maintain High-Performance Buildings Image of a solar panel. Project Funding Funding and Contract Assistance for Energy Projects Image of a lightbulb. Procuring Energy-Efficient Products Specify and Purchase Efficient Products

392

Federal Energy Management Program: Better Buildings Federal Award  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Better Buildings Federal Award on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Better Buildings Federal...

393

Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands (216(h)) Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands (216(h)) On October 23, 2009, the...

394

Restrospective Regulatory Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On January 18, 2011, President Obama issued Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, which directs federal agencies, among other things, to review existing regulations and...

395

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Renewable Energy Renewable Energy Multiple laws and executive orders define requirements for the use of renewable energy in Federal facilities. The Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 2005: Defines "renewable energy" as electric energy generated from solar, wind, biomass, landfill gas, ocean (including tidal, wave, current, and thermal), geothermal, municipal solid waste, or new hydroelectric generation capacity achieved from increased efficiency or additions of new capacity at an existing hydroelectric project Requires the Secretary of Energy to ensure that, to the extent economically feasible and technically practicable, the following amounts of the total electricity consumed by the Federal government come from renewable energy: Not less than 3% in fiscal years 2007-2009

396

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Project Funding » Utility Energy Service Contracts » Federal Project Funding » Utility Energy Service Contracts » Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Federal Utility Partnership Working Group October 7, 2013 - 2:31pm Addthis The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) establishes partnerships and facilitates communications among Federal agencies, utilities, and energy service companies. The group develops strategies to implement cost-effective energy efficiency and water conservation projects through utility incentive programs at Federal sites. The mission and objectives of the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group are to: Enhance existing or foster new partnerships between Federal agencies and their servicing utilities to identify, develop, and implement cost-effective energy efficiency, water conservation, and renewable energy

397

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

35245 35245 Vol. 77, No. 114 Wednesday, June 13, 2012 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Rural Utilities Service 7 CFR Part 1700 RIN 0572-AC23 Substantially Underserved Trust Areas (SUTA) AGENCY: Rural Utilities Service, USDA. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Rural Utilities Service (RUS) is issuing regulations related to loans and grants to finance the construction, acquisition, or improvement of infrastructure projects in Substantially Underserved Trust Areas (SUTA). The intent is to implement Section 306F of the Rural Electrification Act by providing the process by which eligible applicants may apply for funding by the agency. DATES: Effective: July 13, 2012. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michele Brooks, Director, Program Development and Regulatory Analysis,

398

Proposed Rules Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

18954 18954 Vol. 76, No. 66 Wednesday, April 6, 2011 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 5 CFR Chapters XXIII and XXIV 10 CFR Chapters II, III, and X 18 CFR Chapter I 41 CFR Chapter 109 48 CFR Chapter 9 Reducing Regulatory Burden; Retrospective Review Under E.O. 13563 AGENCY: Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy. ACTION: Request for information; extension of public comment period. SUMMARY: On February 3, 2011, the Department of Energy (DOE) published a request for information (RFI) issued as part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ''Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review.'' This document announces that the period for submitting reply comments is extended to April 15, 2011. The February 3 document incorrectly published in the Notices section of the Federal Register.

399

CRAD, Occupational Safety & Health- Idaho Accelerated Retrieval Project Phase II  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a February 2006 Commencement of Operations assessment of the Occupational Safety and Industrial Hygiene Program at the Idaho Accelerated Retrieval Project Phase II.

400

CRAD, Radiological Controls- Idaho Accelerated Retrieval Project Phase II  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a February 2006 Commencement of Operations assessment of the Radiation Protection Program at the Idaho Accelerated Retrieval Project Phase II.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

California load management research 1977: a first year report to the Federal Energy Administration on the FEA/California Electric Utilities Demonstration Project. Annual report for 1977  

SciTech Connect

The California Electric Utilities Demonstration Project (EUDP) seeks to identify cost effective ways to implement load management. The three-year, six-million-dollar project will involve 24 field experiments, four electric utilities, and 7000 residential, commercial and industrial utility customers. Each experiment tries to measure how the tested management measure reduces system peak demand and shifts kilowatt-hour use in both customer and system load curves. Results of three experiments are given. The four participating utilities (Southern California Edison, Pacific Gas and Electric, Sacramento Municipal Utility District, and San Diego Gas and Electric) are described. A load curve data catalog is discussed. An appendix to the report shows how to select load management equipment. Another discusses both United States and European load management experiences.

Hairston, R.

1977-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

402

RL-721 REV3 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and complete Sitewide Categorical Exclusion Criteria: Page 1 of 2 YES NO NO gJ RL-721 Document ID Number: REV3 NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM (continued) DOECX-00057 Sitewide...

403

Review of U.S. ESCO industry market trends: An empirical analysis of project data  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

sector energy efficiency services industry and market trendsof US ESCO Industry Market Trends site energy basis (1 kWh =suspect that energy Review of US ESCO Industry Market Trends

Goldman, Charles A.; Hopper, Nicole C.; Osborn, Julie G.; Singer, Terry E.

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

404

Economic Development Impacts of Community Wind Projects: A Review and Empirical Evaluation; Preprint  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

'Community wind' refers to a class of wind energy ownership structures. The extent of local ownership may range from a small minority share to full ownership by persons in the immediate area surrounding the wind project site. Potential project owners include local farmers, businesses, Native American tribes, universities, cooperatives, or any other local entity seeking to invest in wind energy. The opposite of community wind is an 'absentee' project, in which ownership is completely removed from the state and community surrounding the facility. Thus, there is little or no ongoing direct financial benefit to state and local populations aside from salaries for local repair technicians, local property tax payments, and land lease payments. In recent years, the community wind sector has been inhibited by manufacturers' preference for larger turbine orders. This often puts smaller community wind developers and projects at a competitive disadvantage. However, state policies specifically supporting community wind may become a more influential market factor as turbines are now more readily available given manufacturer ramp-ups and the slow-down in the industry that has accompanied the recent economic and financial crises. This report examines existing literature to provide an overview of economic impacts resulting from community wind projects, compares results, and explains variability.

Lantz, E.; Tegen, S.

2009-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

405

Exploring Ways to Standardize Federal Energy Contracts  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Exploring Ways to Standardize Exploring Ways to Standardize Federal Energy Contracts May 23, 2013 Chandra Shah for Tracy J. Logan Program Analyst Federal Energy Management Program Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy Energy Lawyers and Contracting Officers Working Group 2 Vision Evolution toward standardization of cross-sector and cross-project terms, conditions, reporting methodologies, financial calculations and contract structure to improve transparency and replicability of performance contracts. * Adoption of the Federal Uniform Performance Contract increases transparency and reduces transaction costs. * Technical and financial data and specifications are presented in a clear, predictable manner from contract to contract. * Federal Contracting Officers

406

Revealing the Hidden Value that the Federal Investment Tax Credit...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

that the Federal Investment Tax Credit and Treasury Cash Grant Provide To Community Wind Projects Mark Bolinger Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Environmental Energy...

407

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Request for Information...

408

Federal, Public Power Districts, Rural Water Users & Western...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Rates Federal Customers Bureau of Reclamation (Mni Wiconi project) Ellsworth AFB, South Dakota Turtle Mountain & Fort Totten, North Dakota Public Power Districts Municipal...

409

ESS 2012 Peer Review - NYSERDA Energy Storage Projects - Dhruv Bhatnagar, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NYSERDA Energy Storage Projects NYSERDA Energy Storage Projects Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. SAND No. 2011-XXXXP NaS Battery at MTA Long Island Bus Depot Beacon Flywheel Plant at Stephentown, NY 4 Demonstration Project Sites 1) Beacon Flywheel Plant at Stephentown, NY * Ancillary services in NYISO 2) NaS Battery at MTA Long Island Bus Depot * Time of day load shifting to avoid TOU rates 3) Flow Battery at Niagara Falls State Park * Renewables integration/firming &

410

Federal Energy Management Program: Technologies  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Technologies Technologies The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) offers information about energy-efficient and renewable energy technologies through the following areas. Energy-Efficient Product Procurement: Find energy-efficient product requirements and technology, purchasing specifications, energy cost savings calculators, model contract language, and resources. Technology Deployment: Look up information about developing, measuring, and implementing new and underutilized technologies for energy management in the Federal Government. Renewable Energy: Read about renewable energy requirements, resources and technologies, project planning, purchasing renewable power, and more. See FEMP's other program areas. Contacts | Web Site Policies | U.S. Department of Energy | USA.gov

411

Independent management and financial review, Yucca Mountain Project, Nevada. Final report, Appendix  

SciTech Connect

The Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (Public Law 97-425), as amended by Public Law 100-203, December 22, 1987, established the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) within the Department of Energy (DOE), and directed the Office to investigate a site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, to determine if this site is suitable for the construction of a repository for the disposal of high level nuclear waste. Work on site characterization has been under way for several years. Thus far, about $1.47 billion have been spent on Yucca Mountain programs. This work has been funded by Congressional appropriations from a Nuclear Waste Fund to which contributions have been made by electric utility ratepayers through electric utilities generating power from nuclear power stations. The Secretary of Energy and the Governor of the State of Nevada have appointed one person each to a panel to oversee an objective, independent financial and management evaluation of the Yucca Mountain Project. The Requirements for the work will include an analysis of (1) the Yucca Mountain financial and, contract management techniques and controls; (2) Project schedules and credibility of the proposed milestones; (3) Project organizational effectiveness and internal planning processes, and (4) adequacy of funding levels and funding priorities, including the cost of infrastructure and scientific studies. The recipient will provide monthly progress report and the following reports/documents will be presented as deliverables under the contract: (1) Financial and Contract Management Preliminary Report; (2) Project Scheduling Preliminary Report; (3)Project Organizational Effectiveness Preliminary Report; (4) Project Funding Levels and Funding Priorities Preliminary Report; and (5) Final Report.

1995-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

412

Federal Register Volume 64 Number 14; Friday, January 22, 1999  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 1999 / Notices 2 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 1999 / Notices parties on the scope of the reevaluation study and the alternatives, issues, and resources to be addressed in the DEIS. Comments and participation in this process are encouraged. An informal scoping workshop will be held on Monday, February 1, 1999, from 1 PM until 8 PM within the project area at the State of Illinois Building (Illinois Department of Transportation) located at 1100 Eastport Plaza Drive in Collinsville, Illinois (telephone 618- 346-3100). A notice of this meeting will be provided to interested parties and to the local news media. 7. Availability The Draft EIS is scheduled to be available for public review in late 1999. Dated: January 12, 1999. Thomas J. Hodgini,

413

Federal Register Volume 64 Number 14; Friday, January 22, 1999  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

92 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 1999 / Notices 92 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 1999 / Notices parties on the scope of the reevaluation study and the alternatives, issues, and resources to be addressed in the DEIS. Comments and participation in this process are encouraged. An informal scoping workshop will be held on Monday, February 1, 1999, from 1 PM until 8 PM within the project area at the State of Illinois Building (Illinois Department of Transportation) located at 1100 Eastport Plaza Drive in Collinsville, Illinois (telephone 618- 346-3100). A notice of this meeting will be provided to interested parties and to the local news media. 7. Availability The Draft EIS is scheduled to be available for public review in late 1999. Dated: January 12, 1999. Thomas J. Hodgini,

414

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on AddThis.com... Energy-Efficient Products Technology Deployment Renewable Energy Federal Requirements Renewable Resources & Technologies

415

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Basics Federal Requirements By Regulation

416

Application of direct contact heat exchangers to geothermal power production cycles. Project review, December 1, 1974--May 31, 1977  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Work performed on the development of direct contact heat exchanger power cycles for geothermal applications is reviewed. The period covered in the report is from the inception of the project in 1974 through May 31, 1977. Results from a large experimental program on heat exchanger develpment as well as from many analyses of components and cycle performance and economics are given. A number of working fluids and operating conditions have been considered, and no major obstacles for the implementation of the concept have been discovered.

Jacobs, H.R.; Boehm, R.F.; Hansen, A.C.

1977-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

417

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Federal Energy Management Program Technical Assistance Project 184 U.S. Customs and Border Protection Laboratory, Houston, Texas  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report documents the findings of an on-site energy audit of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Laboratory in Houston, Texas. The focus of the audit was to identify various no-cost and low-cost energy efficiency opportunities that, once implemented, would reduce electricity and gas consumption and increase the operational efficiency of the building. This audit also provided an opportunity to identify potential capital cost projects that should be considered in the future to acquire additional energy (electric and gas) and water savings to further increase the operational efficiency of the building.

Arends, J.; Sandusky, William F.

2010-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

418

Review of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project Construction Quality, November 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project Construction Quality May 2011 November 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background .......................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Scope .................................................................................................................................................... 1

419

Review of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project Construction Quality, November 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project Construction Quality May 2011 November 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background .......................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Scope .................................................................................................................................................... 1

420

Review of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project Construction Quality, March 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Site Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project Construction Quality May 2011 March 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background .......................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Scope .................................................................................................................................................... 1

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Review of U.S. ESCO industry market trends: An empirical analysis of project data  

SciTech Connect

This article summarizes a comprehensive empirical analysis of U.S. Energy Service Company (ESCO) industry trends and performance. We employ two parallel analytical approaches: a comprehensive survey of firms to estimate total industry size and a database of {approx}1500 ESCO projects, from which we report target markets and typical project characteristics, energy savings and customer economics. We estimate that industry investment for energy-efficiency related services reached US $2 billion in 2000 following a decade of strong growth. ESCO activity is concentrated in states with high economic activity and strong policy support. Typical projects save 150-200 MJ/m2/year and are cost-effective with median benefit/cost ratios of 1.6 and 2.1 for institutional and private sector projects. The median simple payback time is 7 years among institutional customers; 3 years is typical in the private sector. Reliance on DSM incentives has decreased since 1995. Preliminary evidence suggests that state enabling policies have boosted the industry in medium-sized states. ESCOs have proven resilient in the face of restructuring and will probably shift toward selling ''energy solutions,'' with energy efficiency part of a package. We conclude that a private sector energy-efficiency services industry that targets large commercial and industrial customers is viable and self-sustaining with appropriate policy support both financial and non-financial.

Goldman, Charles A.; Hopper, Nicole C.; Osborn, Julie G.; Singer, Terry E.

2003-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

422

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery. Progress review No. 89  

SciTech Connect

Summaries are presented for the DOE contracts related to supported research for thermal recovery of petroleum, geoscience technology, and field demonstrations in high-priority reservoir classes. Data included for each project are: title, contract number, principal investigator, research organization, beginning date, expected completion date, amount of award, objectives of the research, and summary of technical progress.

NONE

1998-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

423

Notice of public meeting and additional opportunity for public review and comment for the WAPA Eastern Plains Transmission Project (DOE/EIS-0390)(06/04/07)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

792 Federal Register 792 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 106 / Monday, June 4, 2007 / Notices Training Activity Support System (STASS), Navy Personnel Command, Application for Tuition, the Marine Corps and Coast Guard personnel systems extracts, Assistance Form (NAVMC 10883), education counselors, educational institutions, Tuition Assistance Authorization Form (NAVEDTRA 1560/5), and Academic contractor. EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM: None. [FR Doc. E7-10683 Filed 6-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001-06-P DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request AGENCY: Department of Education. SUMMARY: The IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management invites comments on the submission for OMB review as required by the Paperwork

424

Federal Power Act | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Federal Power Act Federal Power Act Year 1920 Url [[File:|160px|link=http://www.fws.gov/laws/lawsdigest/FEDPOWR.HTML]] Description References Federal Power Act[1] The original Federal Power Act provides for cooperation between the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) and other Federal agencies, including resource agencies, in licensing and relicensing power projects. The President is required to appoint the five commissioners with the advice and consent of the Senate (16 U.S.C. 792). The President is also authorized, at the request of the Commission, to detail engineers from the Departments of Agriculture or Interior for field work (16 U.S.C. 793). "Navigable waters" (for which the Commission has jurisdiction under the Commerce Clause) are defined to include "streams or other bodies of water

425

Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Facility Energy Facility Energy Checklist to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on AddThis.com... Project Assistance Training Outreach Awards for Saving Energy Energy Action Month FAQs Facility Checklist Home Energy Checklist Office Checklist Energy Coordinators Commit to Efficiency Facility Energy Checklist This checklist outlines actions that conserve energy within facilities.

426

Seismic Safety Margins Research Program (Phase I). Project IV. Structural building response; Structural Building Response Review  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

As part of the Phase I effort of the Seismic Safety Margins Research Program (SSMRP) being performed by the University of California Lawrence Livermore Laboratory for the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the basic objective of Subtask IV.1 (Structural Building Response Review) is to review and summarize current methods and data pertaining to seismic response calculations particularly as they relate to the objectives of the SSMRP. This material forms one component in the development of the overall computational methodology involving state of the art computations including explicit consideration of uncertainty and aimed at ultimately deriving estimates of the probability of radioactive releases due to seismic effects on nuclear power plant facilities.

Healey, J.J.; Wu, S.T.; Murga, M.

1980-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

427

Federal Energy Management Program: Publications  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Advanced Search Browse by Topic Mail Requests Help Software FAQs Feature featured product thumbnail Federal Energy Management Program Overview - Facilitating Sound, Cost-Effective Energy Management Details Bookmark & Share View Related Welcome to the Federal Energy Management Program's (FEMP) publication and product library. Use this database to: Search for FEMP publications and products View or download publications Request hard copies of select publications and products. Search the Library Search (Searches Title, Description, Filename and Keywords) Advanced Search Browse by Topic Most Popular Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC) ENABLE Program The Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC) ENABLE program, a new project funding approach, allows small Federal facilities to realize energy and water savings in six months or less. ESPC ENABLE pr Details Bookmark & Share

428

Status Review of Wildlife Mitigation at Columbia Basin Hydroelectric Projects, Oregon Facilities, Final Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The report presents a review and documentation of existing information on wildlife resources at Columbia River Basin hydroelectric facilities within Oregon. Effects of hydroelectric development and operation; existing agreements; and past, current and proposed wildlife mitigation, enhancement, and protection activities were considered. (ACR)

Bedrossian, Karen L.

1984-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

429

River Protection Project (RPP) Readiness to Proceed 2 Internal Independent Review Team Final Report  

SciTech Connect

This report describes the results of an independent review team brought in to assess CH2M Hill Hanford Group's readiness and ability to support the RPP's move into its next major phase - retrieval and delivery of tank waste to the Privatization Contractor

SCHAUS, P.S.

2000-03-29T23:59:59.000Z

430

River Protection Project (RPP) Readiness to Proceed 2 Internal Independent Review Team Final Report  

SciTech Connect

This report describes the results of an independent review team brought in to assess CH2M HILL Hanford's readiness and ability to support the RPP's move into its next major phase - retrieval and delivery of tank waste to the Privatization Contractor.

SCHAUS, P.S.

2000-03-15T23:59:59.000Z

431

RL-721 REV4 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

47, Rev 1 47, Rev 1 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Transfer Actions under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, Bl.30 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform transfer actions, where the predominant activity is transportation, and where the receipt and storage capacity and management capability for the amount and type of materials, equipment, or waste to be moved already exists at the receiving site; and all necessary facilities and operations at the receiving site are already permitted, licensed, or approved, as appropriate. Transfers may

432

RL-721 REV4 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

87 87 CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company - Site Characterization and Environmental Monitoring, December 2012 to December 2013 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions- e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): CH2MHill Plateau Remediation (PRC) will be conducting site characterization and environmental monitoring on the Han Site in accordance with the categorical exclusion (CX) referenced in 10 CFR 102 , Appendix B, CX 83.1, ''Site characterization and environmental monitoring''. PRC ects include all those identified Sections J.l3 and J.l4 of the PRC Contract, DE-AC06-0 RL14788. Site characterization and environmental monitoring (including, but not limited to, siting,

433

RL-721 REV4 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Renovation of 274-AW Under CX B2.l, "Workplace Enhancements" 11. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Washington River Protection Solutions LLC (WRPS) will renovate the 274-AW building. The 274-AW building is a 10-wide modular building located in the 200 East Area near the 241-AW and 241-AP Tank Farms. It was installed in 1993 by Eric R. Brown Construction, Inc. as a support facility for 272-AW. The facility currently serves as an office for WRPS' Base Operations managers and engineers. 274-AW is centrally located and easily accessible,

434

RL-721 REV4 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

11, Rev 0 11, Rev 0 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Routine Maintenance and Custodial Services under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, Bl.3 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform routine maintenance and custodial services on Hanford buildings, structures, infrastructures, and equipment in previously disturbed and developed areas. Routine maintenance and custodial services include those in MSA contract DE-AC06-09RL14728, Attachment J.3. Buildings, structures, infrastructures, and equipment subject to routine maintenance and custodial services

435

RL-721 REV4 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

51 Rev. l 51 Rev. l Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For CY 2013 Scheduled To Take Place Under CX 81.28, "Placing a Facility in an Environmentally Safe Condition" II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions ·e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Washington River Protection Solutions LLC (WRPS) will place facilities in a cold, dark, and environmentally safe condition during Calendar Year 2013. WRPS will perform all activities in accordance with the categorical exclusion (CX) limitations set forth in 10 CFR 1021, Appendices A & 8 to Subpart D, & CX 81.28. WRPS' facilities include all those identified in

436

RL-721 REV4 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

93 Rev 0 93 Rev 0 River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For CY 2013 Scheduled To Take Place Under CX B5.6, "Oil Spill Cleanup" II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Washington River Protection Solutions LLC (WRPS) will perform actions to remove and cleanup oil and related contaminated materials recovered during oil spill cleanup operations during Calendar Year 2013. WRPS will perform all activities in accordance with the categorical exclusion (CX) limitations set forth in 10 CFR 1021, Appendices A & B to Subpart D, & ex B5.6. WRPS' facilities include all those identified in the Tank Operations Contract

437

RL-721 REV4 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

38, Rev 1 38, Rev 1 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Electronic Equipment under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B1.7 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform acquisition, installation, operation, modification, and removal of electricity transmission control and monitoring devices, communication systems, data processing equipment, and similar electronic equipment. Activities include, but are not limited to, install fiber optic cable between and within existing buildings; install new conduit and/or replace old conduit; minor

438

RL-721 REV4 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, Rev 0 2, Rev 0 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Facility Safety and Environmental Improvements under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B2.5 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform safety and environmental improvements of a facility (including, but not limited to, replacement and upgrade of facility components) that do not result in a significant change in the expected useful life, design capacity, or function of the facility and during which operations may be suspended and then resumed. Improvements include, but are not limited to, replacement/

439

RL-721 REV3 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10 Number: 10 Number: DOE/CX-00051 Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For CY 2012 Scheduled To Take Place Onder CX B1.28, "Placing a Facility in an Environmentally Safe Condition" II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions - e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, etc.): Washington River Protection Solutions LLC (WRPS) will place facilities in a cold, dark, and environmentally safe condition on & near the Hanford Site during Calendar Year 2012. WRPS will perform all activities in accordance with the categorical exclusion (CX) limitations set forth in 10 CFR 1021, Appendices A & B to Subpart D, & CX B1.28. WRPS' facilities

440

RL-721 REV4 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

48 Rev. 1 48 Rev. 1 Washington River Protection Solutions LLC -Proposed Actions For CY 2013 Scheduled To Take Place Under CX B1.3, "Routine Maintenance" II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Washington River Protection Solutions LLC (WRPS) will perform routine maintenance services on buildings, structures, infrastructure and equipment during Calendar Year 2013. WRPS will perform all routine maintenance activities in accordance with the categorical exclusion (CX) limitations set forth in 10 CFR 1021, Appendices A & B to Subpart D, and CX B1.3. WRPS' facilities include all those identified in the Tank Operations Contract Sections J.13

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

RL-721 REV4 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3, Rev 0 3, Rev 0 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Site Characterization and Environmental Monitoring under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B3.1 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform site characterization and environmental monitoring (including siting, construction, modification, operation, dismantlement, and removal of equipment). Activities would be near-surface, shallow, and in previously disturbed or developed areas; designed to conform with applicable requirements and use best management practices to limit the effects of any resultant ground disturbance.

442

RL-721 REV4 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 Rev 0 7 Rev 0 Washington River Protection Solutions LLC Place Under CX 86.1, "Cleanup Actions" Proposed Actions For CY 2013 Scheduled To Take 11. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions- e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Washington River Protection Solutions LLC (WRPS) will perform small-scale, short-term cleanup actions, costing ten million or less, under the Resource Conservation & Recovery Act (RCRA), Atomic Energy Act, or other authorities as necessary to reduce risk to human health or the environment from a release or threat of release of a hazardous substance of than high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel during Calendar Year 2013. WRPS

443

RL-721 REV4 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

62 Rev. 1 62 Rev. 1 Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For CY 2013 Scheduled To Take Place Onder CX B5.1, "Actions to Conserve Energy or Water" 11. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions ·e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Washington River Protection Solutions LLC (WRPS) will perform actions to conserve energy or water during Calendar Year 2013. WRPS will perform all activities in accordance with the cal exclusion (CX) limitations set forth in 10 CFR 1021, Appendices A & B to Subpart D, & CX 85.1. WRPS' facilities include all those identified in the Tank Operations Contract Sections J.l3 and J.l4. Activities would include, but are not limited to:

444

Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses Plan. Draft for Peer Review: Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction Project  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction (HEDR) Project staff are developing mathematical models to be used to estimate the radiation dose that individuals may have received as a result of emissions since 1944 from the US Department of Energy`s (DOE) Hanford Site near Richland, Washington. An uncertainty and sensitivity analyses plan is essential to understand and interpret the predictions from these mathematical models. This is especially true in the case of the HEDR models where the values of many parameters are unknown. This plan gives a thorough documentation of the uncertainty and hierarchical sensitivity analysis methods recommended for use on all HEDR mathematical models. The documentation includes both technical definitions and examples. In addition, an extensive demonstration of the uncertainty and sensitivity analysis process is provided using actual results from the Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction Integrated Codes (HEDRIC). This demonstration shows how the approaches used in the recommended plan can be adapted for all dose predictions in the HEDR Project.

Simpson, J.C.; Ramsdell, J.V. Jr.

1993-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

445

Review of Electrical System Configuration Management and Design Change Control at the Savannah River Site, Waste Solidification Building Project, July 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Independent Review of Independent Review of Electrical System Configuration Management and Design Change Control at the Savannah River Site, Waste Solidification Building Project July 2011 Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ......................................................................................................................................1 2.0 Scope .........................................................................................................................................1 3.0 Background ...............................................................................................................................2

446

Review of Commercial Grade Dedication Plans for the Safety Instrumented System at the Savannah River Site Waste Solidification Building Project, August 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review of Review of Commercial Grade Dedication Plans for the Safety Instrumented System at the Savannah River Site Waste Solidification Building Project May 2011 August 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 2

447

Review of Electrical System Configuration Management and Design Change Control at the Savannah River Site, Waste Solidification Building Project, July 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Review of Independent Review of Electrical System Configuration Management and Design Change Control at the Savannah River Site, Waste Solidification Building Project July 2011 Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ......................................................................................................................................1 2.0 Scope .........................................................................................................................................1 3.0 Background ...............................................................................................................................2

448

Review of Commercial Grade Dedication Plans for the Safety Instrumented System at the Savannah River Site Waste Solidification Building Project, August 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Review of Review of Commercial Grade Dedication Plans for the Safety Instrumented System at the Savannah River Site Waste Solidification Building Project May 2011 August 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 2

449

Federal Information Processing Standards  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Federal Information Processing Standards Publications (FIPS PUBS). ... Replacement Standards for Withdrawn FIPS on Geographic Codes.

2013-07-30T23:59:59.000Z

450

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products September 2011 Update to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products September 2011 Update on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products September 2011 Update on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products September 2011 Update on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products September 2011 Update on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products September 2011 Update on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal

451

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products November 2011 Update to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products November 2011 Update on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products November 2011 Update on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products November 2011 Update on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products November 2011 Update on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products November 2011 Update on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal

452

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products February 2012 Update to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products February 2012 Update on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products February 2012 Update on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products February 2012 Update on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products February 2012 Update on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products February 2012 Update on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal

453

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal

454

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Operations & Maintenance Greenhouse Gases Water Efficiency Basics

455

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Utility Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners on AddThis.com...

456

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Facility Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on AddThis.com... Requirements by Subject

457

Economic assessment of geothermal direct heat technology: A review of five DOE demonstration projects  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

In this report the cost of using low temperature geothermal energy resources for direct heating applications is compared to the costs associated with conventional heating fuels. The projects compared all involved replacing conventional fuels (e.g., natural gas and fuel oils) with geothermal energy in existing heating systems. The cost of using geothermal energy in existing systems was also compared with the cost of new coal-fired equipment.

Hederman, William F. Jr.; Cohen, Laura A.

1981-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

458

Paying Upfront: A Review of Salt River Project's M-Power Prepaid Program  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Arizonas Salt River Project (SRP) has operated M-Power, the largest electricity prepayment program in the United States, since 1993. The customer population has grown to about 100,000 (approximately 12% of all residences served by SRP), and it has expanded from the initial target populationconsumers with arrears facing service terminations and low-income customersto include consumers with different expectations from M-Power service. The in-home portion of the SRP prepay configuration consists of a user d...

2010-10-12T23:59:59.000Z

459

Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Working Group Working Group The Renewable Energy Working Group provides a forum for Federal agencies and the renewable energy industry to exchange information on existing and planned projects, lessons learned, sources of project funds, and technologies. Guidance The Renewable Energy Working Group is charged with providing guidance about renewable energy regulatory requirements. Federal Renewable Energy Requirement Guidance Under EPAct 2005 and Executive Order 13423 Transmittal Letter Summarizing the Federal Renewable Energy Requirement Guidance Members Led by the Federal Energy Management Program, the Renewable Energy Working Group is made up of more than 100 Federal agency representatives, U.S. Department of Energy programs, and the renewable energy industry. Meetings

460

Project Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Building the Infrastructure for CCUS Pittsburgh,...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Project Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Building the Infrastructure for...

462

Project Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Infrastructure for CCS August 20-22, 2013 Evaluating Potential Groundwater Impacts and Natural Geochemical...

463

Federal Interagency Chemistry Representatives (FICR) ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Federal Interagency Chemistry Representatives (FICR) Meeting 2013 - A Federal Green Chemistry Forum. ...

2013-05-31T23:59:59.000Z

464

Federal Financial Report  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

FEDERAL FINANCIAL REPORT FEDERAL FINANCIAL REPORT (Follow form instructions) 1. Federal Agency and Organizational Element 2. Federal Grant or Other Identifying Number Assigned by Federal Agency Page of to Which Report is Submitted (To report multiple grants, use FFR Attachment) 1 pages 3. Recipient Organization (Name and complete address including Zip code) 4a. DUNS Number 4b. EIN 5. Recipient Account Number or Identifying Number 6. Report Type 7. Basis of Accounting

465

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: Irvine Smart Grid Demonstration Project - Ardalan Kemiab, Southern California Edison  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Peer Review Meeting Peer Review Meeting Irvine Smart Grid Demonstration (ISGD) ( ) Ed Kamiab Southern California Edison (SCE) 6/8/2012 ISGD Objective SCE' I i S t G id D t ti (ISGD) ill (Insert graphic here) SCE's Irvine Smart Grid Demonstration (ISGD) will demonstrate an integrated, scalable Smart Grid system that includes many of the interlocking pieces of an end- to-end Smart Grid system, from the transmission and distrib tion s stems to cons mer applications s ch as distribution systems to consumer applications such as smart appliances and plug-in electric vehicles. Life-cycle Funding ($K) FY2010 FY2015 1. Energy Smart Customer Devices 2 Year 2020 Distribution System Technical Scope FY2010 - FY2015 $39,612 2. Year 2020 Distribution System 3. Interoperability & Cyber Security 4. Workforce of the Future

466

Federal Energy Management Program: New and Underutilized Water...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

promising for Federal agency deployment. Review each technology for potential facility energy savings. Additional information is available by clicking on the individual technology,...

467

Terms of Reference Independent Panel to Review the Doing Business Project/Report  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The President of the Bank, as discussed with the Board of Executive Directors, will appoint an independent panel of experts (the Panel) to review a broad range of issues around the Doing Business report, as it marks its 10 th year. These Terms of Reference share background information, lay out the scope of the review, note the main criteria for the selection of Panel members, and outline a timeline for reporting back to the President. Background Since its first publication in 2003, the annual Doing Business reports have received much attention. Doing Business indicators were conceived to help catalyze reforms of business regulations and track progress on the implementation of the reforms measured by the indicators. Policy makers, academics, CSOs and international development agencies use the indicators and the underlying data in research, in monitoring and evaluation programs, and as a reference point in gauging private sector development. The 10-year point is a good time to conduct a thorough review, taking stock of the experience to date, analyzing results, distilling lessons learned, and mapping the way forward. Given the

unknown authors

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

468

Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Major  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Major Renovations to someone by E-mail Major Renovations to someone by E-mail Share Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Major Renovations on Facebook Tweet about Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Major Renovations on Twitter Bookmark Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Major Renovations on Google Bookmark Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Major Renovations on Delicious Rank Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Major Renovations on Digg Find More places to share Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Major Renovations on AddThis.com... Home Introduction Assessing Renewable Energy Options Planning, Programming, & Budgeting Project Funding

469

PERCENT FEDERAL LAND FOR OIL/GAS FIELD OUTLINES  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

pFLayer As IFeatureLayer, pOutSR As ISpatialReference) As IPolygon ' project the search geometry (well buffer polygon) into ' whatever the projection of the federal land...

470

SY-101 Rapid Transfer Project Low Temperature Operations Review and Recommendations to Support Lower Temperature Limits  

SciTech Connect

The lower temperature limit for the 241 SY-101 RAPID transfer project is currently set at 20 F Based on the analysis and recommendations in this document this limit can be lowered to 0 F. Analysis of all structures systems and components (SSCs) indicate that a reduction in operating temperature may be achieved with minor modifications to field-installed equipment. Following implementation of these changes it is recommended that the system requirements be amended to specify a temperature range for transfer or back dilute evolutions of 0 F to 100 F.

HICKMAN, G.L.

2000-01-10T23:59:59.000Z

471

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy Efficiency...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

efficient electric water heaters available, saving 50% to 60% over standard products. ENERGY STAR Qualified Products FEMP provides acquisition guidance and Federal efficiency...

472

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Fleet Reporting  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

legislation requires agencies to annually report information on Federal motor vehicle usage and the makeup of their motor vehicle fleets. Agencies must also report the use of...

473

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Technology Deployment...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

& Initiatives Solid State Lighting Working Group Distributed Energy ResourcesCombined Heat & Power Resources Renewable Energy Federal Technology Deployment Working Group Energy...

474

Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Integrating Renewable Energy in Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction Developed by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP), the "Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy into Federal Construction" helps Federal agencies understand renewable energy options, select appropriate types of renewable energy technologies, and