Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Reviewing Measurement and Verification Plans for Federal ESPC Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Document provides a framework for implementing uniform and consistent reviews of measurement and verification (M&V) plans for Federal energy savings performance contract (ESPC) projects.

2

Reviewing Measurement and Verification Plans for Federal ESPC Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reviewing Measurement & Verification Plans Reviewing Measurement & Verification Plans for Federal ESPC Projects February 2007 Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy This document was developed for the U.S. Department of Energy's Federal Energy Management Program by Nexant, Inc., and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. This document is posted on FEMP's web site at www.eere.energy.gov/femp/financing/ . [Headers and footers only revised 12/08] Reviewing M&V Plans Contents REVIEWING MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION PLANS FOR FEDERAL ESPC PROJECTS ............................................................................................................ 1 STEP 1 - PREPARE CUSTOM REPORT AND CHECKLIST FROM TEMPLATE .......................... 1

3

Reviewing Post-Installation and Annual Reports for Federal ESPC Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reviewing Post-Installation and Annual Reports Reviewing Post-Installation and Annual Reports For Federal ESPC Projects February 2007 Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy This document was developed for the U.S. Department of Energy's Federal Energy Management Program by Nexant, Inc., and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. This document is posted on FEMP's Web site at www.eere.energy.gov/femp/financing/superespcs_mvresources.html. Contents Reviewing Post-Installation and Annual Reports for Federal ESPC Projects 1 Step 1 - Prepare Custom Report and Checklists from Template 1 Step 2 - Review Project Documentation 2 Step 3 - Complete Checklists 2 Step 4 - Finalize Report 3 Step 5 - Provide Written Review to Agency and DOE 3

4

Reviewing Post-Installation and Annual Reports for Federal ESPC Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The purpose of this document is to provide a framework for implementing uniform and consistent reviews of post-installation and annual reports for federal ESPC projects. These procedures will allow for consistent evaluations of performance reports, produce standardized reviews, and enable centralized tracking of ongoing project performance.

5

Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Integrated Waste Treatment Unit Federal Operational Readiness Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Operational Readiness Review June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 4.0 Results ................................................................................................................................................... 2

6

Reviewing Measurement and Verification Plans for Federal ESPC...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reviewing Measurement and Verification Plans for Federal ESPC Projects Reviewing Measurement and Verification Plans for Federal ESPC Projects Document provides a framework for...

7

Federal Project Directors in  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

appropriate front-end plan- appropriate front-end plan- ning process would help DOE to identify the mission need for the project and aid in iden- tification and evaluation of alternative approaches and assessment of the cost and risks of each. This should lead to a well-defined set of re- quirements and scope of work that form the basis for effec- tive design. Front-end plan- ning in the DOE project man- agement system includes plan- ning procedures from project conception through approval of the performance baseline (CD-2). The Office of Engineering and Construction Management has developed two guides to assist Federal Project Directors in measuring progress toward achieving technology and pro- ject definition maturity during front-end planning prior to CD -2. DOE G 413.3-4, Technol-

8

Federal Energy Management Program: Project Funding  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Project Funding Project Funding AFFECT FOA Webinar FEMP hosted a 60-minute informational webinar and question and answer session on the AFFECT FOA on November 12, 2013. Review the webinar slides and transcript. Federal energy projects require funding to generate results. Carefully matching available funding options with specific project needs can make the difference between a stalled, unfunded project and a successful project generating energy and cost savings. The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) supports Federal agencies identify, obtain, and implement project funding for energy projects through: Energy Savings Performance Contracts ESPC ENABLE Process Utility Energy Service Contracts On-Site Renewable Power Purchase Agreements Energy Incentive Programs. Federal agencies can choose the funding options that best fits for their project needs. For an overview of available funding options and strategies, read the FEMP Project Funding Quick Guide.

9

Energy Savings Performance Contract Federal Project Executives  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Federal project executive (FPEs) help agencies launch energy savings performance contract (ESPC) projects.

10

2015 Project Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) is hosting the 2015 Peer Review on March 2327, 2015, at the Hilton Mark Center, in Alexandria, Virginia. Approximately 185 projects in BETOs research, development, and demonstration portfolio will be presented to the public and systematically reviewed by external subject-matter experts from industry, academia, and federal agencies.

11

Federal Sector Renewable Energy Project Implementation: ""What...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Federal Sector Renewable Energy Project Implementation: ""What's Working and Why Federal Sector Renewable Energy Project Implementation: ""What's Working and Why Presentation by...

12

Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Coordination in Federal Agency Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Regarding Coordination in Federal Regarding Coordination in Federal Agency Review of Electric Transmission Facilities on Federal Land, October 23, 2009 Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Coordination in Federal Agency Review of Electric Transmission Facilities on Federal Land, October 23, 2009 On October 23, 2009, the Department of Energy and eight other Federal agencies entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to improve coordination among project applicants, federal agencies, states and tribes involved in the siting and permitting process for electric transmission facilities on Federal land. The MOU will improve uniformity, consistency, and transparency by describing each entity's role and responsibilities when project applicants wish to build electric transmission facilities.

13

Integrating State and Federal Environmental Reviews  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA and CEQA: Integrating State and Federal Environmental Reviews Draft for Public Review and Comment March 2013 2 Table of Contents: I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 II. Questions and Answers .................................................................................................................... 5 A. Stage 1: Preliminary Questions ................................................................................................. 5 1. How Does NEPA and CEQA Terminology Differ? .................................................... 5 a. "Action" (NEPA) versus "Project" (CEQA) ................................................ 5

14

Project Execution Plan Review Module (RM)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Project Execution Plan (PEP) Review Module (RM) is a tool that assists DOE federal project review teams in evaluating the adequacy of the PEP development and maintenance for projects of any...

15

Reviewing Post-Installation and Annual Reports for Federal ESPC...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Post-Installation and Annual Reports for Federal ESPC Projects The purpose of this document is to provide a framework for implementing uniform and consistent reviews of...

16

Funding Federal Energy and Water Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Funding Federal Energy and Water Projects The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) helps Federal agencies identify and obtain funding for energy efficiency, renewable energy, water conservation, and greenhouse gas (GHG) management projects. Federal agencies cannot rely on Congressional appropriations alone to fund the energy projects needed to meet Federal require- ments. Additional funding options are available, including: * Energy savings performance contracts (ESPCs) * Utility energy service contracts (UESCs) * Power purchase agreements (PPAs) * Energy incentive programs Carefully matching available funding options with specific

17

Planning for Solar Projects on Federal Sites | Department of...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Planning for Solar Projects on Federal Sites Planning for Solar Projects on Federal Sites Photo of a photovoltaic system. Planning for the federal site solar project can begin...

18

Projected Benefits of Federal Energy Efficiency and  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Projected Benefits of Federal Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Programs FY 2008 Budget is clean, abundant, reliable, and affordable #12;Projected Benefits of Federal Energy Efficiency Coordinator: Michael Leifman o Biomass: Zia Haq, Tien Nguyen o Buildings: Jerry Dion, David Boomsma o Federal

19

Enterprise Assessments Review, Idaho Cleanup Project- September 2014  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review of the Idaho Cleanup Project Integrated Waste Treatment Unit Federal Readiness Assessment at the Idaho Site

20

Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Coordination in Federal Agency Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Coordination in Federal Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Coordination in Federal Agency Review of Electric Transmission Facilities on Federal Land, October 23, 2009 Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Coordination in Federal Agency Review of Electric Transmission Facilities on Federal Land, October 23, 2009 On October 23, 2009, the Department of Energy and eight other Federal agencies entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to improve coordination among project applicants, federal agencies, states and tribes involved in the siting and permitting process for electric transmission facilities on Federal land. The MOU will improve uniformity, consistency, and transparency by describing each entity's role and responsibilities when project applicants wish to build electric transmission facilities.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Federal Staffing Guide for Project Management  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This Guide provides an approach to determining the appropriate level and type of federal personnel needed to effectively plan, direct, and oversee project execution. Superseded by DOE G 413.3-19 Admin Chg 1.

2010-06-03T23:59:59.000Z

22

Federal Loan Guarantees for Projects that Manufacture Commercial...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Federal Loan Guarantees for Projects that Manufacture Commercial Technology Renewable Energy Systems and Components: August 10, 2010 Federal Loan Guarantees for Projects that...

23

Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects The Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, in collaboration with the Member Agencies of the Steering Committee (Member Agencies) created under Executive Order 13604 of March 22, 2012, and pursuant to the June 7, 2013 Transmission Presidential Memorandum, is seeking public input on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process. The proposed IIP Process is intended to improve interagency and intergovernmental coordination focused on ensuring that project proponents develop and submit accurate and complete information early in the project planning process to facilitate efficient

24

What is the Federal Demonstration Project  

SciTech Connect

The Federal Demonstration Project is a cooperative effort between a number of universities, a private research institute, and several federal agencies to increase research productivity by eliminating unnecessary administrative procedures and by streamlining and standardizing needed controls. The Project aims to locate responsibility for decision-making as close as possible to principal investigators while maintaining necessary institutional and agency oversight to ensure accountability. By freeing researchers from some of their paperwork burden, more efficient research administration systems will enable investigators to spend more of their time doing science and engineering. The Federal Demonstration Project is an outgrowth of an earlier activity sponsored by five major federal R D agencies at the Florida State University System and the University of Miami. In Florida, the focus was on standardizing and streamlining procedures for administering research grants after the grants had been awarded to the universities. (See Attachment 1 for descriptions of the demonstrations carried out under the Florida Demonstration Project). In May 1988, the most successful of the demonstrated procedures were approved by the US Office of Management and Budget for use in grants awarded by any federal agency to any research organization. The new procedures give agencies authority to waive requirements that grantees obtain federal approval prior to taking a number of administrative actions with respect to grant management. The FDP institutions together with the participating federal agencies are designing and demonstrating innovative research administration procedures and are assessing the impact of those new procedures.

Not Available

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

25

Federal Agency Projects | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Agency Projects Federal Agency Projects Federal Agency Projects Technical experts from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) help federal agencies pursue aggressive and integrated solutions to energy independence. Examples include work with the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) to meet net-zero energy goals at military installations and reduce fossil fuel use in polar regions. U.S. Department of Defense DOE and DOD have teamed up to help military installations across the United States reduce their reliance on local energy grids by producing as much energy on-site as their buildings, facilities, and fleet vehicles consume. U.S. Marine Corps Air Station Miramar DOE and NREL are performing assessments at select DOD sites to evaluate the

26

Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Assistance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Renewable Energy Renewable Energy Project Assistance to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Assistance on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Assistance on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Assistance on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Assistance on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Assistance on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Assistance on AddThis.com... Energy-Efficient Products Technology Deployment Renewable Energy Federal Requirements Renewable Resources & Technologies Project Planning & Implementation

27

Contacts for Integrating Renewable Energy into Federal Construction Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Contacts to learn more about integrating renewable energy technologies into Federal construction projects.

28

General Engineer (Federal Project Director)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

A successful candidate in this position will serve as the overall Project Manager and expert responsible for providing leadership to program oversight activities for the operations of facilities to...

29

Federal Project Director Toolbox | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Project Director Toolbox Federal Project Director Toolbox Federal Project Director Toolbox Although the majority of the documents listed on this page appear elsewhere on the PMCDP Web site, the FPD Tool Box page was specifically designed with all current and aspiring FPDs in mind in that it houses all of the PMCDP's major tools and job aids in one specific, easy-to-access location. Whether you are applying for a new level of certification, or determining which courses or activities will provide you with the most continuing education credits, the Toolbox is the place to go to locate the best information that will ensure your success in the PMCDP program. Below is a list of the most prominent PMCDP job aids to include a brief summary of their respective contents: Certification Equivalency Guideline (CEG): The CEG establishes the U.S.

30

Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Project  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Project Construction to someone by E-mail Project Construction to someone by E-mail Share Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Project Construction on Facebook Tweet about Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Project Construction on Twitter Bookmark Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Project Construction on Google Bookmark Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Project Construction on Delicious Rank Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Project Construction on Digg Find More places to share Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Project Construction on AddThis.com... Home Introduction Assessing Renewable Energy Options Planning, Programming, & Budgeting

31

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment This manual...

32

Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Planning and  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Renewable Energy Renewable Energy Project Planning and Implementation to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Planning and Implementation on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Planning and Implementation on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Planning and Implementation on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Planning and Implementation on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Planning and Implementation on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Planning and Implementation on AddThis.com... Energy-Efficient Products

33

Federal Energy Management Program: Technical and Project Assistance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Technical and Technical and Project Assistance to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Technical and Project Assistance on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Technical and Project Assistance on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Technical and Project Assistance on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Technical and Project Assistance on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Technical and Project Assistance on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Technical and Project Assistance on AddThis.com... Project Assistance Call for Projects Training Outreach Technical and Project Assistance The Federal Energy Management Program's (FEMP) offers technical and project assistance to help Federal agencies successfully implement energy- and

34

Federal Energy Management Program: Diversifying Project Portfolios for  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Diversifying Diversifying Project Portfolios for Utility Energy Service Contracts to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Diversifying Project Portfolios for Utility Energy Service Contracts on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Diversifying Project Portfolios for Utility Energy Service Contracts on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Diversifying Project Portfolios for Utility Energy Service Contracts on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Diversifying Project Portfolios for Utility Energy Service Contracts on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Diversifying Project Portfolios for Utility Energy Service Contracts on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program:

35

Pre-Screening for Solar Projects on Federal Sites | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Pre-Screening for Solar Projects on Federal Sites Pre-Screening for Solar Projects on Federal Sites Photo of a solar array. Conducting an agency-wide solar energy pre-screening is...

36

Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal - June 2012 Federal - June 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Federal - June 2012 June 2012 Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Integrated Waste Treatment Unit Federal Operational Readiness Review This report documents the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), independent review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project-Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (SBWTP-IWTU) DOE (Federal) Operational Readiness Review (D-ORR). The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations and was intended to assess the effectiveness of the CORR process as implemented for the SBWTP-IWTU. This review also provides additional data regarding

37

Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act Project Stories  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Project Stories to someone by E-mail Project Stories to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act Project Stories on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act Project Stories on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act Project Stories on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act Project Stories on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act Project Stories on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act Project Stories on AddThis.com... Energy Savings Performance Contracts ENABLE Utility Energy Service Contracts On-Site Renewable Power Purchase Agreements Energy Incentive Programs Recovery Act Technical Assistance Projects Project Stories Recovery Act Project Stories

38

Federal Assistance Reporting Checklist and Instructions for Projects...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

for Projects Federal Assistance Reporting Checklist and Instructions for Projects DOE F 4600.2 FA RepReqChklst FINAL 10-2014.docx...

39

MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

November/December 2004 November/December 2004 Report Period: November 1- December 31, 2004 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS The Program Directive for the wildlife survey is on schedule for completion by January 15. Comments from the Biological Technical Assistance group have been incorporated. MRAP A punchlist of mill site restoration items was prepared. DOE and the City of Monticello have agreed upon which entity will perform each item on the punchlist. MVP No significant activities to report. FF A Monthly Report November- December 2004 Page 2 of5 STATUS MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITIES AGREEMENT REPORT November/December 2004 Report Period: November 1- December 31, 2004 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath Operable Units I and II DOE and the City of Monticello (City) are exploring the possibility of transferring the former

40

Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Federal - June 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Federal - June 2012 June 2012 Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Integrated Waste Treatment Unit Federal Operational Readiness Review This report documents the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), independent review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project-Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (SBWTP-IWTU) DOE (Federal) Operational Readiness Review (D-ORR). The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations and was intended to assess the effectiveness of the CORR process as implemented for

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

MRAP MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

MRAP MRAP MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT May/June 2005 Report Period: May 1 -June 30, 2005 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS DOE constmction, as identified in the Millsite Restoration Plan, was substantially completed on June 3. Seeding of disturbed areas was completed on June 15. MSG DOE completed constmction of the permeable reactive treatment cell and initiated operations in June. The cell is an enhancement to the existing pe1meable reactive ban·ier and was designed to alleviate ground water mounding. MVP Approximately one cubic yard of contaminated material was identified in a City of Monticello excavation near the golf course. This material was transferred to the Temporary Storage Facility located at the DOE Monticello Office.

42

BioGas Project Applications for Federal Agencies and Utilities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation covers BioGas Project Applications for Federal Agencies and Utilities and is given at the Spring 2010 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meeting in Rapid City, South Dakota.

43

Federal Energy Management Program: Large-scale Renewable Energy Projects  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Large-scale Large-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Larger than 10 MWs) to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Large-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Larger than 10 MWs) on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Large-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Larger than 10 MWs) on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Large-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Larger than 10 MWs) on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Large-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Larger than 10 MWs) on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Large-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Larger than 10 MWs) on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Large-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Larger than 10 MWs) on

44

Federal Energy Management Program: FDA Construction Project Serves as a  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

FDA Construction FDA Construction Project Serves as a Super ESPC Model to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: FDA Construction Project Serves as a Super ESPC Model on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: FDA Construction Project Serves as a Super ESPC Model on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: FDA Construction Project Serves as a Super ESPC Model on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: FDA Construction Project Serves as a Super ESPC Model on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: FDA Construction Project Serves as a Super ESPC Model on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: FDA Construction Project Serves as a Super ESPC Model on AddThis.com... Energy Savings Performance Contracts

45

Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group Manual...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group Manual Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group Manual This Revision 3 of the Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility...

46

Project Peer Reviews | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Peer Reviews Project Peer Reviews ProjectPeerReviews.pdf More Documents & Publications IndependentPeerReviewProgram.pdf Peer Review EERE Program Management Guide - Appendix D...

47

Financing and Contracting Decisions for Solar Projects on Federal Sites  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Selecting the financing or contracting option for the federal solar project can be a complex decision, especially if funding from the agency has not been designated.

48

BioGas Project Applications for Federal Agencies and Utilities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Alternate Energy Systems, Inc. Alternate Energy Systems, Inc. Natural Gas / Air Blenders for BioGas Installations BioGas Project Applications for Federal Agencies and Utilities Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting - October 20-21, 2010 Rapid City, SD 1 BioGas Project Applications for Federal Agencies and Utilities Wolfgang H. Driftmeier Alternate Energy Systems, Inc. 210 Prospect Park - Peachtree City, GA 30269 wdriftmeier@altenergy.com www.altenergy.com 770 - 487 - 8596 Alternate Energy Systems, Inc. Natural Gas / Air Blenders for BioGas Installations BioGas Project Applications for Federal Agencies and Utilities Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting - October 20-21, 2010 Rapid City, SD 2 BioGas Project Applications for Federal Agencies and Utilities Objective

49

Federal Energy Management Program: ESPC ENABLE Project Assistance and  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Project Assistance and Training Project Assistance and Training ESPC ENABLE Training To learn how to use ESPC ENABLE, take the Streamlining ESPCs for Small Sites First Thursday Seminar on demand. The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) offers project assistance and training to help Federal agencies implement Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPC) ENABLE projects. Project Assistance Through FY2014, project assistance from FEMP is cost-free and may include project management as well as technical support from experienced project facilitators and procurement staff. General Services Administration (GSA) contracting staff are also available to answer questions regarding the GSA Federal Supply Schedule 84, SIN 246-53. To learn more about one-on-one project assistance for your ESPC ENABLE project, contact Evan Fuka at 202-406-4107.

50

Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects on Federal Lands  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Mason Emnett Mason Emnett Office of Energy Policy and Innovation Jonathan First Office of the General Counsel February 6, 2013 NOTE: Comments herein do not represent the views of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or its Commissioners Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects on Federal Lands 2 Purpose of this Presentation * Describe the types of transactions that fall under FERC jurisdiction * Describe pertinent federal laws and how they apply - What does it mean to be a "public utility" or "transmitting utility" under federal law? - How does ownership and usage of a generation facility impact regulatory considerations? - When are parties required to register with NERC? 3 FERC-Related Statutes * Federal Power Act

51

Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects on Federal Lands  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Mason Emnett Mason Emnett Office of Energy Policy and Innovation Jonathan First Office of the General Counsel February 6, 2013 NOTE: Comments herein do not represent the views of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or its Commissioners Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects on Federal Lands 2 Purpose of this Presentation * Describe the types of transactions that fall under FERC jurisdiction * Describe pertinent federal laws and how they apply - What does it mean to be a "public utility" or "transmitting utility" under federal law? - How does ownership and usage of a generation facility impact regulatory considerations? - When are parties required to register with NERC? 3 FERC-Related Statutes * Federal Power Act

52

Federal Register Notice for Draft Addendum to Environmental Review...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Notice for Draft Addendum to Environmental Review Documents Concerning Exports of Natural Gas from the United States Federal Register Notice for Draft Addendum to...

53

NEPA and CEQA: Integrating State and Federal Environmental Reviews...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

California Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) have jointly prepared the handbook "NEPA and CEQA: Integrating Federal and State Environmental Reviews." The handbook...

54

Wendy Cain named portfolio federal project director for ETTP cleanup  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The U.S. Department of Energys Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management has named Wendy Cain as its new portfolio federal project director for cleanup of the East Tennessee Technology Park.

55

Federal Energy Management Program: Technical and Project Assistance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Technical and Project Assistance Technical and Project Assistance The Federal Energy Management Program's (FEMP) offers technical and project assistance to help Federal agencies successfully implement energy- and water-efficiency projects. Call for Projects: Look up current FEMP project opportunities. Working with DOE National Laboratories: Learn about working with the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) national laboratories through FEMP technical services and work-for-others agreements. Sell Energy-Efficient Products: Read about resources available to vendors interested in doing business with the Federal Government. GSA Schedules: Look up more commercial products and services at volume discount pricing arranged by the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA). For more information about FEMP, see:

56

Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Project Assistance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Assistance Assistance Call for Projects FEMP recently issued a notice of intent to release a Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) that will provide grants to develop renewable energy projects. Read the call for projects. See box below for information on project assistance for this upcoming FOA. Request to Receive Project Assistance from FEMP Federal agencies interested in receiving FEMP project assistance must complete the renewable energy project assistance request form and email it to Boyan Kovacic. Applications will be processed on a weekly basis. For technical assistance on the upcoming FEMP FOA "Assisting Federal Facilities with Energy Conservation Technologies" (AFFECT), agencies must submit a letter stating their need for assistance and their intent to apply for the FOA in addition to completing the renewable energy project assistance request form.

57

Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group Manual  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

LEVEL WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY FEDERAL REVIEW GROUP MANUAL REVISION 3 JUNE 2008 (This page intentionally left blank) Low-Level JVllsfe Disposal Fllcili~l' Federal Review Group il1allUlli Revision 3, June 200S Concurrence The Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group Manual, Revision 3, is approved for use as of the most recent date below. Date Chair, Low-Level Waste Disposal Federal Review Group Andrew WalJo, 1II Deputy Director, Otlice of Nuclear Safety, Quality Assurance, and Environment Department of Energy OHlce of Health, Safety, and Security e C. WilJiams Associate Administrator for Infrastructure and Environment National Nuclear Security Administration Low-Level 'Vaste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group J1aJll/ai

58

2015 Project Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Bioenergy Technologies Office is hosting the 2015 Peer Review on March 2327, 2015, at the Hilton Mark Center, in Alexandria, Virginia.

59

SOUTHEASTERN FEDERAL POWER ALLIANCE Allatoona Project  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Allatoona Project 1138 GA Highway 20 Spur, Cartersville, GA 30121 March 10-11, 2014 March 10, 2014: Meet at the Fairfield Inn & Suites, Interstate 75, Exit 288 at 3:45 p.m. Caravan...

60

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient Product Procurement Portfolio Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient Product...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

AVIAN/WIND STATISTICAL PEER REVIEW PROJECT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

AVIAN/WIND STATISTICAL PEER REVIEW PROJECT Prepared for: California Energy Commission Prepared by............................................................................................................................................ 1 SELECTION OF PEER REVIEW TEAMS .............................................................................................................................. 2 TECHNICAL EXPERTISE OF PEER REVIEW TEAMS

62

MAES Project Review Procedures The projects shown on the Project Review list (distributed to Department Heads) will  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Page 1 MAES Project Review Procedures The projects shown on the Project Review list (distributed to the Peer Review Committee o Comply with MAES Project Review Procedures o After the seminar and Project Review and ensure overall compliance with established procedures for MAES Project Reviews Internal

Maxwell, Bruce D.

63

Enabling Mass-Scale Financing for Federal Energy, Water, and Sustainability Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation covers Enabling Mass-Scale Financing for Federal Energy, Water, and Sustainability projects and is given at the Spring 2011 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meeting.

64

MAES Project Review Procedures SEMINAR FORMAT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

MAES Project Review Procedures SEMINAR FORMAT The peer review seminar will be styled after oral the project's past accomplishments (if renewal) Discuss the new project proposal 2. Open Discussion ­ (approx

Maxwell, Bruce D.

65

Project Title and Principal Investigators FY 2014 Federal  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Sea Grant Program Project Title and Principal Investigators FY 2014 Federal Funding * FY 2014, NY, RI, WHOI Buy Out or Build Back? A Comparative Assessment of Approaches to Employing Public Stewards Academies in Maryland (Dana R. Fisher) $69,999 $35,007 MI Development of Stable Open Channel

66

MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

August/September 2005 August/September 2005 Report Period: July 1- September 30, 2005 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS The draft-final Monticello Long-Term Surveillance and Afaintenance Operating Procedures for Swface and Ground Water (Volume III) and draft-final Annual Data Summmy Report for Operable Unit Ill of the Monticello Mill Tailings Site, October 2004 through April 2005 were completed. MRAP The annual inspection of the Monticello Mill Tailings Site and the Monticello Vicinity Properties was conducted on September 14 and 15. Several high priority repair items (see page 3 of this report) were identified during the inspection and were repaired by September 30, 2005. MVP No significant activities to report. FFA Monthly Report July- September 2005

67

MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

September/October 2004 September/October 2004 Report Period: September 1- October 31, 2004 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS With the completion of all remedial action reports, installation of monitoring wells in accordance with the Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan, and an onsite inspection by EPA and UDEQ, EPA was able tci write and sign the Preliminmy Closeout Report for the Monticello Mill Tailings Site (MMTS), Operable Units I, II, and III. With EPA's signature on this document (September 29, 2004), the MMTS was designated as "construction complete." MRAP The annual inspection oftheMMTS was conducted September 15-17,2004. With the exception of property now owned by the City of Monticello, the site is in good condition. Restoration and maintenance issues continue to exist on City owned property. DOE continues

68

MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

August 2004 August 2004 Report Period: July 1- August 31, 2004 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS Two monitoring wells were installed, which completed the monitoring network for OU III. The following documents have been completed: * · Monticello Mill Tailings Site Operable Unit III Post-Record of Decision Monitoring Plan * Remedial Action/Remedial Design Workplan for the Monticello Mill Tailings Site Operable Unit III MRAP DOE is continuing discussions with the City of Monticello concerning adequate restoration of the former millsite. On July 27, the DOE Contracting Officer wrote a letter insisting that the City of Monticello explain its plans to remedy the failure of the restoration of the Monticello Millsite as required under a Cooperative Agreement between the City and DOE.

69

MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

May/June 2004 May/June 2004 Report Period: May 1- June 30, 2004 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS The Record of Decision for the Monticello Mill Tailings (USDOE) Site Operable Unit IlL Swface Water and Ground Water, Monticello, Utah, was signed by DOE, UDEQ, and EPA. The last signature was obtained on June 2, 2004, seven days before the scheduled completion date. Monitored Natnral Attenuation is the selected remedy. MRAP The water level in the Pond 4 Leak Detection System is monitored daily; the level is static and pumping is no longer necessary. MVP Approximately 40 cubic yards of bricks and mortar were removed by the owner from the Park Plaza Apartments (MS-00057) and placed near a city utility excavation. The bricks and mortar exceed the soil standard of 5 pCi/g Ra-226 above background and were

70

MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITIES AGREEMENT REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

FACILITIES AGREEMENT REPORT FACILITIES AGREEMENT REPORT Report Period: October 1- December 31, 2005 DOE Project Coordinator: Ray Plieness HIGHLIGHTS The Final Report-2005 Avian Wetland Surveys at the Monticello Mill Tailings Site and the Final Report-Monticello Mill Tailings Site Macroinvertebrate Sampling for 2005 were transmitted to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ) on December 13. These reports are required under the Monticello Mill Tailings Site Operable Unit III Post-Record of Decision Monitoring Plan, Section 6.0 Biomonitoring Plan, to determine whether selenium levels are present in environmental media at concentrations that could cause adverse effects on ecological receptors. MRAP The draft-flnal2005 Annual Inspection of the Monticello Mill Tailings (USDOE) and

71

MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

January/February 2005 January/February 2005 Report Period: January 1 -February 28, 2005 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ), and U.S. Department ofEnergy (DOE) agreed that the Monticello Administrative Manual and Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Operating Procedures will not be combined into a single manual. Instead, the Monticello LTSM Operating Procedures for Swface and Ground Water will be written to address Operable Unit III requirements. A draft of this manual will be delivered to EPA and UDEQ by April14, 2005, and a draft-final version will be completed by August 12, 2005. A Program Directive for conducting wildlife surveys at the Monticello wetland areas has been

72

Certified Federal Project Directors | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Certified Federal Project Directors Certified Federal Project Directors Project Assessment (OPA) OPA Home About Project Management SC Projects Other Links SC Federal Project Directors (FPD) and FPD Resources Certified Federal Project Directors FPD Leadership Skills .pdf file (29KB) SC FPD 360° Mentoring Contact Information Project Assessment U.S. Department of Energy SC-28/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4840 F: (301) 903-8520 E: sc.opa@science.doe.gov SC Federal Project Directors (FPD) and FPD Resources Certified Federal Project Directors Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Site Federal Project Director Level Certified Project Contact Information Ames Site Office (AMSO) Cynthia Baebler 1 630-252-1563 cynthia.baebler@ch.doe.gov Argonne Site Office (ASO) Dale Dietzel 1 630-252-2555 dale.dietzel@ch.doe.gov

73

Mn/DOT's Project Peer Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Mn/DOT's Project Management Peer Review Creating a Project Management Culture 2010 CTS Research and perspectives ·Peer Review Process and Results ·Construction Industry Perspective ·Next Steps ·Q & A #12;Why a Peer Review? Why Project Management? ·Improve project delivery performance ­ on time, on budget (an

Minnesota, University of

74

Preliminary Assessment Review FOR Federal ESPCs | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

contract (ESPC) project. 10paevaluation.docx More Documents & Publications DRAFT Measurement & Verification Guidelines Version 4.0 FEMP Best Practices and Lessons Learned...

75

SRS - Area Completion Projects - Federal Facility Agreement and Supporting  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5/2013 5/2013 SEARCH GO spacer Administrative Record File/Information Repository File Federal Facility Agreement and Supporting Documentation General Information and Technologies Public Involvement Home SRS Home Area Completion Projects Federal Facility Agreement and Supporting Documentation * Federal Facility Agreement -The document that directs the comprehensive remediation of the Savannah River Site Appendix Affected by Modification: Appendix D Issuance of EPA and SCDHEC approved Revision.0 Appendix D for Fiscal Year 2013 (Print Date: 08/27/2013). The SCDHEC provided a comment on the Revision 0 Appendix D for Fiscal Year 2013 (Print Date: 08/27/2013) on Spetember 26, 2013. The EPA provided conditional approval, pending resolution of the SCDHEC's comment, of theRevision 0 Appendix D for Fiscal Year 2013 (Print Date: 08/27/2013) on October 30, 2013.

76

Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Federal - June 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Federal - June 2012 June 2012 Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project -...

77

Post Critical Decision-4 Mark Arenaz, Federal Project Director  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

31, 2011 31, 2011 Lessons Learned from the In-Situ Grouting in the Subsurface Disposal Area Post Critical Decision-4 Mark Arenaz, Federal Project Director Summary Protection of the Snake River Plain Aquifer is a major driver for environmental remediation at the Department of Energy's (DOE) Idaho Site. In 2010, the Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) used in-situ grouting to stabilize buried waste and reduce the migration of specific radioactive contaminates to the aquifer. The action was accomplished using American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Public Law 111-5) Program funding of a capital asset acquisition project under DOE Order 413.3A, Program and Project Management for Acquisition of Capital Assets. Lessons learned from previous subsurface grouting activities contributed to the safe, timely and

78

Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project Transportation - September 2000 Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project Transportation - September 2000 September 2000 Transportation Emergency Management Review of the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) and National Transportation Program (NTP)/Transportation Compliance Evaluation/Assistance Program (TCEAP) The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Emergency Management Oversight, within the Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance, conducted a transportation emergency management review of the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) and National Transportation Program (NTP)/Transportation Compliance Evaluation/Assistance Program (TCEAP) in September 2000.

79

I have reviewed your Request for Information published in the Federal Register o  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

have reviewed your Request for Information published in the Federal Register on February 27, 2012. I have reviewed your Request for Information published in the Federal Register on February 27, 2012. I would suggest that these are very difficult questions to answer and really vary by the developer, the region and the type of project. There are no canned answers that would fit for responses to the questions raised. I would suggest that a joint workshop be set up with a cross section of industry representatives to meet with members of the Rapid Response Team and explore these questions and the range of answers together. I think it is more important that the RRT understand what developers must go through for generation and transmission projects. It is clear that RRT does understand the variation in schedules between transmission and certain forms of generation. This schedule difference

80

NEPA and CEQA: Integrating State and Federal Environmental Reviews (Final)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

CEQ and the California Governors Office of Planning and Research (OPR) have jointly prepared the handbook NEPA and CEQA: Integrating Federal and State Environmental Reviews. The handbook provides practitioners with an overview of NEPA and CEQA as well as suggestions for developing a single environmental review process that can meet the requirements of both statutes. The handbook also provides a framework for a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between two or more agencies entering into a joint NEPA/ CEQA review process, and addresses the California Energy Commission licensing process, which takes the place of the CEQA process for certain power plants

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

MSGOUID MONTICELLO PROJECTS ·FEDERAL FACILITIES AGREEMENT REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

MSGOUID MSGOUID MONTICELLO PROJECTS ·FEDERAL FACILITIES AGREEMENT REPORT Report Period: Aprill -June 30, 2006 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS DOE submitted the draft Consolidated LTSM Administrative mid Operating Procedures Manual to EPA and UDEQ on May 4, 2006. Document transmittal met the stipulated penalty milestone of May 6, 2006. Semi-annual ground water and surface water monitoring was completed in May 2006 as scheduled. Three FY 2006 Program Directives were prepared and issued for bio-monitoring tasks to assess selenium accumulation in the environment and identify potential ecological receptors. All field work for FY 2006 bio-monitoring task was completed (five waterfowl surveys in May and June, sediment and surface water sample collection in April for selenium analysis,

82

Federating Distributed and Heterogeneous Information Sources in Neuroimaging: The NeuroBase Project Federating Distributed and Heterogeneous In-  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Federating Distributed and Heterogeneous Information Sources in Neuroimaging: The NeuroBase ProjectBase Project C. Barillot1 , H. Benali2 , M. Dojat4 , A. Gaignard1 , B. Gibaud1 , S. Kinkingnéhun2 , J Sources in Neuroimaging: The NeuroBase Project C. Barillot1 , H. Benali2 , M. Dojat3 , A. Gaignard1 , B

Boyer, Edmond

83

Review of the Projects Peer Review Panel and the Project Research and Development Scheme Summary Report  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Review of the Projects Peer Review Panel and the Project Research and Development Scheme Summary Peer Review Panel (PPRP) process and the Project Research and Development (PRD) scheme to develop to funding can sometimes be too long with some delays occurring after the peer review process; Proposals

84

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient Product Procurement Portfolio  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Document details the peer review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient Product Procurement portfolio.

85

FEMP Helps Federal Facilities Develop Large-Scale Renewable Energy Projects  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

FEMP developed a guide to help federal agencies, as well as the developers and financiers that work with them, to successfully install large-scale renewable energy projects at federal facilities.

86

Funding Solar Projects at Federal Agencies: Mechanisms and Selection Criteria (Brochure), Energy Analysis, Series on Financing Renewable Energy Projects  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Introduction Introduction Implementing solar energy projects at federal facilities is a process. The project planning phase of the process includes determining goals, building a team, determining site feasibility, and selecting the appropriate project funding tool. This document gives practical guidance to assist decision-makers with selecting the funding tool that would best meet their site goals. Because project funding tools are complex, federal agencies should seek project assistance before making final decisions. High capital requirements combined with limits on federal agency energy contracts create challenges for funding solar projects. Solar developers typically require long-term contracts (15-20) years to spread out the initial investment and

87

Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 168 - August 29, 2013 Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of...

88

Evaluation of the Impact of EISA Federal Project Investments  

SciTech Connect

The DOE's Federal Energy Management Program has been charged by Office of Management and Budget to conduct an evaluation on actual and verifiable energy savings and carbon emissions reductions from federal energy management investments made across the Federal government as a result of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. This study presents the findings from that evaluation.

Judd, Kathleen S.; Wendel, Emily M.; Morris, Scott L.; Williamson, Jennifer L.; Halverson, Mark A.; Livingston, Olga V.; Loper, Susan A.

2012-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

89

Developing Renewable Energy Projects Larger Than 10 MWs at Federal Facilities (Book)  

SciTech Connect

To accomplish Federal goals for renewable energy, sustainability, and energy security, large-scale renewable energy projects must be developed and constructed on Federal sites at a significant scale with significant private investment. The U.S. Department of Energy's Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) helps Federal agencies meet these goals and assists agency personnel navigate the complexities of developing such projects and attract the necessary private capital to complete them. This guide is intended to provide a general resource that will begin to develop the Federal employee's awareness and understanding of the project developer's operating environment and the private sector's awareness and understanding of the Federal environment. Because the vast majority of the investment that is required to meet the goals for large-scale renewable energy projects will come from the private sector, this guide has been organized to match Federal processes with typical phases of commercial project development. The main purpose of this guide is to provide a project development framework to allow the Federal Government, private developers, and investors to work in a coordinated fashion on large-scale renewable energy projects. The framework includes key elements that describe a successful, financially attractive large-scale renewable energy project.

Not Available

2013-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

90

Federal Project Director of the Year for 2011 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Project Director of the Year for 2011 Federal Project Director of the Year for 2011 Federal Project Director of the Year for 2011 (from left to right) Daniel Poneman; David Arakawa; Phillip Kraushaar; Johnny Moore; Daniel Lehman; Ingrid Kolb (from left to right) Daniel Poneman; David Arakawa; Phillip Kraushaar; Johnny Moore; Daniel Lehman; Ingrid Kolb Presented to: David K. Arakawa For demonstrating exceptional leadership and project management acumen as Federal Project Director (FPD) for the $68.5 million Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) Instruments - Next Generation (SING) Project at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The SING project provides five best-in-class neutron instruments to support the neutron-scattering needs of the U.S. research community. FPD since June of 2006, David led by example with a

91

Applying Section 404(r) of the Clean Water Act to Federal Projects Which  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Applying Section 404(r) of the Clean Water Act to Federal Projects Applying Section 404(r) of the Clean Water Act to Federal Projects Which Involve the Discharge of Dredged or Fill Materials into Waters of the U.S., Including Wetlands Applying Section 404(r) of the Clean Water Act to Federal Projects Which Involve the Discharge of Dredged or Fill Materials into Waters of the U.S., Including Wetlands This Council on Environmental Quality memorandum establishes procedures for coordinating agency views and formulating Administration policy prior to requesting Congressional action on projects that may be subject to Section 404(r) of the Clean Water Act (Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended). Guidance on Applying Section 404(r) of the Clean Water Act To Federal Projects Which Involve the Discharge of Dredged or Fill Materials into

92

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Procedures for the Review of Federal and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment October 3, 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 - PURPOSE, POLICY, AND MANDATES 1. Purpose 2. Statutory Authorities 3. Policy CHAPTER 2 - MANAGEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS 1. General Responsibilities 2. Office of Federal Activities ❍ A. Federal Agency Liaisons ❍ B. Management Information Unit 3. Regional Office 4. Program Offices 5. Specific Review Management Responsibilities ❍ A. Headquarters and Regional Environmental Review Coordinators ❍ B. Principal Reviewer ❍ C. Associate Reviewer ❍ D. Consolidation of Comments 6. Routing and Lead Responsibility of EIS's and Other Federal Actions CHAPTER 3 - PRE-EIS REVIEW ACTIVITIES 1. Policy 2. General Liaison

93

Planning and Reporting for Operations and Maintenance in Federal...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

contracts (ESPCs). planningomespcs.pdf More Documents & Publications Reviewing Measurement and Verification Plans for Federal ESPC Projects Introduction to Measurement &...

94

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This manual establishes polices and procedures for carrying out the EPA's responsibilities to review and comment on Federal actions affecting the quality of the environment.

95

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This manual establishes policies and procedures for carrying out the Environmental Protection Agency's responsibilities to review and comment on Federal actions affecting the quality of the environment.

96

2014 Annual Merit Review Results Report - Project and Program...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Project and Program Statistical Calculations Overview 2014 Annual Merit Review Results Report - Project and Program Statistical Calculations Overview Merit review of DOE Vehicle...

97

Energy Design Assistance Project Tracker - 2014 BTO Peer Review...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Design Assistance Project Tracker - 2014 BTO Peer Review Energy Design Assistance Project Tracker - 2014 BTO Peer Review Presenter: Larry Brackney, National Renewable Energy...

98

Independent Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site - April 2001 Independent Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site - April 2001 April 2001...

99

Federal Sector Renewable Energy Project Implementation: "What's Working and Why"  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Sector Renewable Energy Project Federal Sector Renewable Energy Project Implementation: "What's Working and Why" Implementation: What s Working and Why DOD-DOE Waste-to- Energy and Fuel Cell Workshop January 13, 2011 Bob Westby Bob Westby NREL Laboratory Program Manager: Federal Energy Management Program NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC Innovation for Our Energy Future Contents Federal Sector Renewable Energy Project Implementation: "What's Working and Why" "What's Working and Why" ƒ Commercially viable RE technologies ƒ RE project economic drivers ƒ Project construct scenarios ƒ ƒ Implementation mechanisms Implementation mechanisms

100

Materials Science Division Project Safety Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Miller, Electron Microscopes Miller, Electron Microscopes Project No. 20006.3 Materials Science Division Project Safety Review Safety Analysis Form (03/08) Date of Submission March 12, 2010 FWP No.: 58405 Project Title User Experimental Work with Electron Microscopes in the Electron Microscopy Center This Safety Analysis Form (SAF) supersedes previous versions of 20006 and its modifications. Is this a (check one) new submission renewal supplemental modification X Principal Investigator(s) Dean Miller Other Participants (excluding administrative support personnel) EMC staff and EMC users (Attach participant signature sheet) Project dates: Start: March 2010 End: Open-ended This form is to be completed for all new investigations or experimental projects that are conducted in MSD laboratories, and for all ongoing such projects that undergo significant change from their original

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Enterprise Assessments Review, West Valley Demonstration Project December 2014  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review of the West Valley Demonstration Project Emergency Management Program Technical Basis and Emergency Preparedness

102

DOE Selects Projects for up to $50 Million of Federal Funding to Modernize  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Selects Projects for up to $50 Million of Federal Funding to Selects Projects for up to $50 Million of Federal Funding to Modernize the Nation's Electricity Grid DOE Selects Projects for up to $50 Million of Federal Funding to Modernize the Nation's Electricity Grid April 21, 2008 - 1:43pm Addthis Demonstration Projects Aim at 15 Percent Reduction of U.S. Peak Load Electricity Demand Washington, DC- U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Assistant Secretary for Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Kevin Kolevar today announced the Department's plans to invest up to $50 million over five years (Fiscal Years 2008 - 2012), subject to appropriations from Congress, in nine demonstration projects competitively selected to increase efficiency in the nation's electricity grid. The Renewable and Distributed Systems Integration (RDSI) technologies demonstrated in these projects aim to

103

DOE Selects Five Ethanol Conversion Projects for $23 Million in Federal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Five Ethanol Conversion Projects for $23 Million in Five Ethanol Conversion Projects for $23 Million in Federal Funding DOE Selects Five Ethanol Conversion Projects for $23 Million in Federal Funding March 27, 2007 - 12:10pm Addthis Projects to Develop Fermentative Organisms to Speed Ethanol Refining WASHINGTON, DC - U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Alexander Karsner today announced just over $23 million in federal funding, subject to negotiation of final project plans and funding, for five projects focused on developing highly efficient fermentative organisms to convert biomass material to ethanol. This research will further President Bush's goals of making cellulosic ethanol cost-competitive by 2012 and, along with increased automobile fuel efficiency, reducing America's gasoline consumption by 20 percent in ten

104

DOE Selects Projects for up to $50 Million of Federal Funding to Modernize  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Projects for up to $50 Million of Federal Funding to Projects for up to $50 Million of Federal Funding to Modernize the Nation's Electricity Grid DOE Selects Projects for up to $50 Million of Federal Funding to Modernize the Nation's Electricity Grid April 21, 2008 - 10:49am Addthis Demonstration Projects Aim at 15 Percent Reduction of U.S. Peak Load Electricity Demand Washington, DC- U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Assistant Secretary for Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Kevin Kolevar today announced the Department's plans to invest up to $50 million over five years (Fiscal Years 2008 - 2012), subject to appropriations from Congress, in nine demonstration projects competitively selected to increase efficiency in the nation's electricity grid. The Renewable and Distributed Systems Integration (RDSI) technologies demonstrated in these projects aim to

105

TUCAP-ETO-STATCOM Project Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE ESS ANNUAL PEER REVIEW DOE ESS ANNUAL PEER REVIEW 11/02/06 ETO Light Power Converter for FACTS & Energy Storage Applications Principal Investigator: Prof Alex Q. Huang Semiconductor Power Electronics Center (SPEC) North Carolina State University, Raleigh SNL Project Manager: Stan Atcitty DOE Manager: Dr. Imre Gyuk 2 DOE ESS ANNUAL PEER REVIEW 11/02/06 Develop a modular VSC for multiple FACTS and energy storage applications with goals of achieving 1. Lower cost * Using lower cost power devices * Reducing component parts * Modular approach 2. Higher reliability * Reducing components parts 3. High power density * Better utilization of silicon * Reducing component parts FY2006 Project Objectives 3 DOE ESS ANNUAL PEER REVIEW 11/02/06 ETO Light TM Power Converter Light triggered ETO 4500V/4000A 2 kW heatpipe

106

Full Reviews: Low-temperature and Exploration Demonstration Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Below are the project presentations and respective peer review results for Low-temperature and Exploration Demonstration Projects. The peer review results for each project will be available soon.

107

DOE Selects Project for up to $7 Million of Federal Funding to Modernize  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Selects Project for up to $7 Million of Federal Funding to Selects Project for up to $7 Million of Federal Funding to Modernize Hawaii's Energy Infrastructure DOE Selects Project for up to $7 Million of Federal Funding to Modernize Hawaii's Energy Infrastructure April 21, 2008 - 1:46pm Addthis University of Hawaii Team to Install Distribution Management System at Maui Substation Honolulu, Hawaii- U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Assistant Secretary for Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE) Kevin Kolevar announced the Department's plans to invest up to $7 million over three years in a demonstration project led by the University of Hawaii's Natural Energy Institute to increase efficiency in the State's energy infrastructure. Assistant Secretary Kolevar was joined by Governor Linda Lingle in making the announcement today in Honolulu. The project, totaling $15 million, is

108

DOE Selects Project for up to $7 Million of Federal Funding to Modernize  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Selects Project for up to $7 Million of Federal Funding to Selects Project for up to $7 Million of Federal Funding to Modernize Hawaii's Energy Infrastructure DOE Selects Project for up to $7 Million of Federal Funding to Modernize Hawaii's Energy Infrastructure April 21, 2008 - 1:46pm Addthis University of Hawaii Team to Install Distribution Management System at Maui Substation Honolulu, Hawaii- U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Assistant Secretary for Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE) Kevin Kolevar announced the Department's plans to invest up to $7 million over three years in a demonstration project led by the University of Hawaii's Natural Energy Institute to increase efficiency in the State's energy infrastructure. Assistant Secretary Kolevar was joined by Governor Linda Lingle in making the announcement today in Honolulu. The project, totaling $15 million, is

109

Funding Solar Projects at Federal Agencies: Mechanisms and Selection Criteria (Brochure)  

SciTech Connect

Implementing solar energy projects at federal facilities is a process. The project planning phase of the process includes determining goals, building a team, determining site feasibility and selecting the appropriate project funding tool. This fact sheet gives practical guidance to assist decision-makers with understanding and selecting the funding tool that would best address their site goals. Because project funding tools are complex, federal agencies should seek project assistance before making final decisions. High capital requirements combined with limits on federal agency energy contracts create challenges for funding solar projects. Solar developers typically require long-term contracts (15-20) years to spread out the initial investment and to enable payments similar to conventional utility bill payments. In the private sector, 20-year contracts have been developed, vetted, and accepted, but the General Services Administration (GSA) contract authority (federal acquisition regulation [FAR] part 41) typically limits contract terms to 10 years. Payments on shorter-term contracts make solar economically unattractive compared with conventional generation. However, in several instances, the federal sector has utilized innovative funding tools that allow long-term contracts or has created a project package that is economically attractive within a shorter contract term.

Not Available

2012-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

110

ORISE: Scientific Peer Review for State and Federal Agencies  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Scientific Peer Review Capabilities Overview Peer review planning Expert identification Peer review management Workshop coordination Process improvement How ORISE is making a...

111

Post Critical Decision-4 Mark Arenaz, Federal Project Director  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

those elements of project requirements documents relative to electrical equipment and lockouttagout. Improvement Action Lesson learned has been incorporated into the prime...

112

Joint federal/state motor fuel tax compliance project. Fiscal year 1994 midyear report  

SciTech Connect

;Table of Contents: List of Exhibits; Executive Summary: History of the Joint Federal/State Motor Fuel Tax Compliance Project; Update on Motor Fuel Tax Procedures; Joint Project Results; Status of the Regional Task Forces; Future Program Activities; References; Glossary of Acronyms; List of Exhibits.

NONE

1994-11-02T23:59:59.000Z

113

FEDERAL ACQUISITION CERTIFICATION FOR PROGRAM AND PROJECT MANAGERS (FAC-P/PM)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CERTIFICATION FOR PROGRAM AND PROJECT CERTIFICATION FOR PROGRAM AND PROJECT MANAGERS (FAC-P/PM) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Purpose. The Federal Acquisition Certification for Program and Project Managers (FAC-P/PM) establishes general training and experience requirements for program and project managers in civilian agencies. The FAC- P/PM focuses on essential competencies needed for program and project managers; the program does not include functional or technical competencies, such as those for information technology, or agency- specific competencies. 2. Background. The quality and effectiveness of the federal acquisition process depend on the development of a capable and competent workforce. The Services Acquisition Reform Act of 2003 (SARA, P.L. 108-136) expanded the definition of acquisition to include functions performed by program and project managers.

114

Safety Assurance Review Plan for: EBWB Interceptor Connection Project  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

#12;Safety Assurance Review Plan for: EBWB Interceptor Connection Project City of Dallas Fort REVIEW 9. REVIEW PLAN APPROVAL AND UPDATES 10. REVIEW PLAN POINTS OF CONTACT ATTACHMENT 1: PROJECT MAP ATTACHMENT 2: PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND COSTS ATTACHMENT 3: TEAM ROSTERS ATTACHMENT 4: REVIEW PLAN

US Army Corps of Engineers

115

HUD's Environmental Review Training  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

An environmental review is the process of reviewing a project and its potential environmental impacts to determine whether it meets federal, state, and local environmental standards. The...

116

Summary of Initial Examination of Lighting-Only Utility Projects in the Federal Sector  

SciTech Connect

This work complements earlier work on an analysis of Federal utility energy projects that implemented excusively lighting upgrades. The objective of this analysis is to better understand the lighting-only projects through determination of the relationship of capital invested and the resulting energy and cost savings, in terms of geographic locale, project size, and potential according to specific lighting technologies and/or control technology implemented.

Solana, Amy E.; Sandusky, William F.; McMordie-Stoughton, Katherine L.

2007-07-26T23:59:59.000Z

117

Independent Oversight Review, Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project- April 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review of Radiation Protection Program Implementation at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project of the Idaho Site

118

Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands (216(h)) |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands (216(h)) Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands (216(h)) Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands (216(h)) On October 23, 2009, the Department of Energy and eight other Federal agencies entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to improve coordination among project applicants, federal agencies, states and tribes involved in the siting and permitting process for electric transmission facilities on Federal land. The MOU will improve uniformity, consistency, and transparency by describing each entity's role and responsibilities when project applicants wish to build electric transmission facilities. Additionally, the MOU designates a "Lead Agency" serving as the single point-of-contact for coordinating all federal environmental reviews

119

Enabling Mass-Scale Financing for Federal Energy, Water, and Sustainability Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Mass-Scale Financing Mass-Scale Financing for Federal Energy, Water And Sustainability Projects Leslie Nicholls Energetics Inc. 1 Requirements for increased federal energy and water efficiency as well as reduced greenhouse gas emissions and sustainable federal facility operations have increased substantially over the past few years. Requirements are most likely to become even more challenging in the years to come. Fill the gap Why ENABLE? 2 The requirement to perform energy audits on "covered" federal facilities will result in about 20-25 thousand buildings audited per year for the foreseeable future The requirement to commission existing buildings wherever deemed to be practicable will be significant. FEMP estimates required investment: $1 billion per year

120

Hanford Sludge Treatment Project Review, June 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1-06-17 1-06-17 Site: DOE-Richland Operations Office Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Sludge Treatment Project Dates of Activity : 06/13/2011 - 06/17/2011 Report Preparer: Jake Wechselberger Activity Description/Purpose: The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed operational awareness reviews of the Sludge Treatment Project (STP), Engineered Container Retrieval and Transfer System (ECRTS) during site visits. Result: During the period June 13-17, 2011, an HSS representative participated in tours of the STP test facility. The HSS representative was also briefed by the CHPRC STP Test Director and the DOE-Richland Operations Office principal support

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Federal Energy Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Guidelines: Guidelines: Measurement and Verifi cation for Federal Energy Projects Version 3.0 M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Federal Energy Projects Version 3.0 Prepared For: U.S. Department of Energy Federal Energy Management Program www1.eere.energy.gov/femp/ Prepared By: Nexant, Inc. 1401 Walnut Street, Suite 400 Boulder, CO 80302 Tel: 303.402.2480 www.nexant.com Under Subcontract To: EMP2, Inc. www.emp2.com April 2008 FEMP M&V Guidelines 3.0 i Acknowledgements This document was prepared by Lia Webster and James Bradford of Nexant, Inc. in Boulder, Colorado. Contributors to this document include: Dale Sartor of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, John Shonder and Erica Atkin of Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and Steve Dunnivant of EMP2. Other materials were developed by various industry-government

122

M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Federal Energy Projects  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Guidelines: Guidelines: Measurement and Verifi cation for Federal Energy Projects Version 3.0 M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Federal Energy Projects Version 3.0 Prepared For: U.S. Department of Energy Federal Energy Management Program www1.eere.energy.gov/femp/ Prepared By: Nexant, Inc. 1401 Walnut Street, Suite 400 Boulder, CO 80302 Tel: 303.402.2480 www.nexant.com Under Subcontract To: EMP2, Inc. www.emp2.com April 2008 FEMP M&V Guidelines 3.0 i Acknowledgements This document was prepared by Lia Webster and James Bradford of Nexant, Inc. in Boulder, Colorado. Contributors to this document include: Dale Sartor of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, John Shonder and Erica Atkin of Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and Steve Dunnivant of EMP2. Other materials were developed by various industry-government

123

M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Federal Energy Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

M&V Guidelines: M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verifi cation for Federal Energy Projects Version 3.0 M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Federal Energy Projects Version 3.0 Prepared For: U.S. Department of Energy Federal Energy Management Program www1.eere.energy.gov/femp/ Prepared By: Nexant, Inc. 1401 Walnut Street, Suite 400 Boulder, CO 80302 Tel: 303.402.2480 www.nexant.com Under Subcontract To: EMP2, Inc. www.emp2.com April 2008 FEMP M&V Guidelines 3.0 i Acknowledgements This document was prepared by Lia Webster and James Bradford of Nexant, Inc. in Boulder, Colorado. Contributors to this document include: Dale Sartor of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, John Shonder and Erica Atkin of Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and Steve Dunnivant of EMP2. Other materials were developed by various industry-government

124

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient Product Procurement Portfolio  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Energy-Efficient Product Procurement (EEPP) Portfolio Meeting: Washington D.C., Dec. 4, 2012 Reviewers: David Goldstein (Chair), Harvey Sachs, Cyndi Vallina, Marina Moses, and Shahzeen Attari Review: Jan. 25, 2013 Summary The Review Committee met in Washington, D.C., and engaged in a day-long discussion with FEMP EEPP staff and contractors. Program staff gave clear and effective presentations, and we had extensive and illuminating discussions with the staff, and to a limited extent with other interested parties who attended. The Committee worked together after the meeting and by email to produce this review. Our review addresses: * strategic issues with respect to the program,

125

Energy Department Announces $5 Million to Develop Clean Energy Projects at Federal Facilities  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

The Energy Department today announced $5 million in funding for nine projects that will advance the development of combined heat and power (CHP) and renewable energy technologies at facilities across the federal government and help meet energy efficiency, renewable energy, and greenhouse gas reduction goals.

126

Amended Notice of Intent for the Northern Pass Transmission Line Project Published in the Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Department of Energy announces its intent to modify the scope of the Northern Pass Transmission Line Project Environmental Impact Statement and to conduct additional public scoping meetings. The Federal Register Notice, which is now available for downloading, includes information on how to submit comments and participate in the additional public scoping meetings.

127

Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group (LFRG) | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Management » Compliance » Low-Level Waste Program Management » Compliance » Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group (LFRG) Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group (LFRG) The Office of Environmental Management (EM) Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group (LFRG) was established to fulfill the requirements contained in Section I.2.E(1)(a) of the Department of Energy (DOE) Order 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management, and exercised by the senior managers of EM. The LFRG assists EM senior managers in the review of documentation that supports the approval of performance assessments and composite analyses or appropriate Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)documents as described in Section II of the LFRG Charter. Through its efforts, the LFRG supports the issuance

128

GUIDELINES FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS INVOLVING DONOR CAMPUS REVIEW  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. The Accounting Manual addresses appropriation and expenditure of donor funds for capital projects and is attachedGUIDELINES FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS INVOLVING DONOR FUNDS CAMPUS REVIEW Capital projects, regardless capital projects, including donor-funded projects, must have a Building Committee appointed

California at Santa Barbara, University of

129

NEPA and CEQA: Integrating State and Federal Environmental Reviews...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Governor's Office of Planning and Research, issued on March 5, 2013, a draft handbook on integrating NEPA and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review processes....

130

The Role of The fedeRal PRojecT diRecToR  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Role of The fedeRal PRojecT diRecToR: Role of The fedeRal PRojecT diRecToR: lessons fRom The naTional igniTion faciliTy The national ignition facility (nif) is home of the world's largest laser. With 192 laser beams that can deliver more than 60 times the energy of any previous laser system, NIF represents a significant step in enabling the study of high-energy density science, and should demonstrate fusion ignition and burn in the laboratory for the first time. The design and construction of this unique, highly complex facility posed management challenges that the project team overseeing its development could not foresee. The national ignition facility's final optics assemblies, shown here mounted on the lower hemisphere of the target chamber, contain

131

U.S. Department of Energy Project Review Guide for Capital Asset Projects  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This Guide addresses the various project reviews conducted during the life-cycle of a project based on the stage, complexity and duration of a project. This Guide describes typical reviews, the purpose of each, the timing during the project life-cycle, lines of inquiry, and required documentation. No cancellations.

2008-09-23T23:59:59.000Z

132

Advanced Sensors and Instrumentation Annual Project Review 2013 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Advanced Sensors and Instrumentation Annual Project Review 2013 Advanced Sensors and Instrumentation Annual Project Review 2013 Advanced Sensors and Instrumentation Annual Project Review 2013 The Advanced Sensors and Instrumentation (ASI) element of the Nuclear Energy Enabling Technologies (NEET) program conducted its first Annual Project Review Meeting on May 21-22, 2013 in Germantown, Maryland. The purpose of this meeting was to review the status of the 10 ASI projects initiated in FY 2012. The meeting summary and project presentations are available here. ASI Project Review Summary ASI Overview High Temperature Fission Chamber Micro-Pocket Fission Detectors Irradiation Testing of Ultrasonic Transducers Recalibration Methodology Digital Technology Qualification Design for Fault Tolerance and Resilience Sensor Degradation Control Systems

133

Independent Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site - April 2001 Independent Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site - April 2001 April 2001 Special Review of the Rocky Flats Closure Project Site The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Environment, Safety, and Health Oversight (EH-2), within the Office of Environment, Safety and Health, conducted an independent oversight Special Review at the Rocky Flats Closure Project (RFCP). The Special Review was conducted at the request of the Rocky Flats Field Office (RFFO), which is the DOE organizational element with responsibility for the RFCP (formerly known as the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site). Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC (KH) is the prime contractor for the RFCP. RFCP's project-oriented approach and aggressive scheduling have resulted

134

Energy and Utility Project Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Utility Project Review and Utility Project Review Energy and Utility Project Review < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Developer Fed. Government Fuel Distributor General Public/Consumer Industrial Installer/Contractor Institutional Investor-Owned Utility Local Government Low-Income Residential Multi-Family Residential Nonprofit Residential Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative Schools Systems Integrator Transportation Tribal Government Utility Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State Wisconsin Program Type Siting and Permitting Provider Department of Natural Resources The DNR's Office of Energy and Environmental Analysis is responsible for coordinating the review of all proposed energy and utility projects in the

135

Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project Transportation- September 2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Transportation Emergency Management Review of the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) and National Transportation Program (NTP)/Transportation Compliance Evaluation/Assistance Program (TCEAP)

136

Independent Oversight Review, Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office- May 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review of the Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management Assessment of the Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office Oversight of the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Criticality Safety Program

137

Microsoft PowerPoint - Vicksburg District Federal Power Projects Branson Conf. 6-2-10 .pptx  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Vicksburg Vicksburg District Federal Power Projects Vicksburg District Federal Power Projects Blakely Mountain Hydro DeGray Hydro DeGray Hydro Narrows Hydro Blakely Mountain Rewind Unit #1 ll Rotor Installation Blakely Mountain Rewind Unit #2 l l Coil Removal Blakely Mountain Rewind Unit #2 l Pole Key Design Blakely Mountain Rewind Unit #2 i l i h l d Removing Pole Key With Sledge Hammer Blakely Rewind Unit #2 Bigger Hammer & Operator Blakely Mountain Rewind Unit #2 l h Removing Rotor Poles With A Saw Blakely Mountain Surge Tank f b h Refurbishment Blakely Mountain Surge Tank f b h Refurbishment Blakely Mountain Switchyard d Disconnect Upgrades Blakely Mountain Switchyard l Oil Containment DeGray Rewind Unit # 2 bl Disassembly DeGray Rewind Unit #2 l l First Coil Samples

138

Renewable Energy Project Financing: Impacts of the Financial Crisis and Federal Legislation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

930 930 July 2009 Renewable Energy Project Financing: Impacts of the Financial Crisis and Federal Legislation Paul Schwabe, Karlynn Cory, and James Newcomb National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 * www.nrel.gov NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC Contract No. DE-AC36-08-GO28308 Technical Report NREL/TP-6A2-44930 July 2009 Renewable Energy Project Financing: Impacts of the Financial Crisis and Federal Legislation Paul Schwabe, Karlynn Cory, and James Newcomb Prepared under Task No. SAO7.9B30 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government.

139

Independent Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site - April 2001 Independent Oversight Special Review, Rocky Flats Closure Project Site - April 2001 April 2001 Special Review of the Rocky Flats Closure Project Site The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Environment, Safety, and Health Oversight (EH-2), within the Office of Environment, Safety and Health, conducted an independent oversight Special Review at the Rocky Flats Closure Project (RFCP). The Special Review was conducted at the request of the Rocky Flats Field Office (RFFO), which is the DOE organizational element with responsibility for the RFCP (formerly known as the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site). Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC (KH) is the prime contractor for the RFCP.

140

Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Contractor - June 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Contractor - June 2012 June 2012 Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Integrated Waste Treatment Unit Contractor Operational Readiness Review This report documents the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), independent review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project-Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (SBWTP-IWTU) contractor Operational Readiness Review (C-ORR). The review was conducted at the Idaho Site from February 27 to March 6, 2012. This report discusses the background, scope, results, and conclusions of the review, as well as

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Independent Oversight Review, Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review, Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Review, Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project - April 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project - April 2013 April 2013 Review of Radiation Protection Program Implementation at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project of the Idaho Site This report documents an independent review of activity-level radiation protection program (RPP) implementation at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) of the Idaho Site, as conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations. The purpose of this Independent Oversight targeted review

142

Construction Project Safety and Health Plan RM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Construction Project Safety and Health Plan (CPSHP) Review Module is a tool that assists DOE federal project review teams in evaluating the technical sufficiency of the project readiness in...

143

Guidelines for obtaining favorable project financing, federal tax incentives, and various state incentives to fund biomass energy development  

SciTech Connect

This paper outlines methods for funding biomass project development. This paper discusses sources of project financing, identifies potential problems associated with financing biomass projects, and provides a brief summary of typical lender requirements. In addition, this paper identifies potential tax incentives and other benefits available from federal and state governments to promote biomass energy.

Lubin, M. [Lubin Financial, San Diego, CA (United States); Sanderson, G.A. [Gomel & Davis, Atlanta, GA (United States)

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

144

South Fork Tolt River Hydroelectric Project : Adopted Portions of a 1987 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission`s Final Environmental Impact Statement.  

SciTech Connect

The South Fork Tolt River Hydroelectric Project that world produce 6.55 average megawatts of firm energy per year and would be sited in the Snohomish River Basin, Washington, was evaluated by the Federal Energy Regulatory commission (FERC) along with six other proposed projects for environmental effects and economic feasibility Based on its economic analysis and environmental evaluation of the project, the FERC staff found that the South Fork Tolt River Project would be economically feasible and would result in insignificant Impacts if sedimentation issues could be resolved. Upon review, the BPA is adopting portions of the 1987 FERC FEIS that concern the South Fork Tolt River Hydroelectric Project and updating specific sections in an Attachment.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1992-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

145

EIA-Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006) Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006) Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006) Each year since 1996, EIA's Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting has produced a comparison between realized energy outcomes and the projections included in previous editions of the AEO. Each year, the comparison adds the projections from the most recent AEO and updates the historical data to the most recently available. The comparison summarizes the relationship of the AEO reference case projections since 1982 to realized outcomes by calculating the average absolute percent differences for several of the major variables for AEO82 through AEO2006. Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review, 2006 Report

146

Office of Water Project Review And the Deep Draft Navigation  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1 Office of Water Project Review And the Deep Draft Navigation Planning Center of Expertise US Army Corps of Engineers #12;Civil Works Project Delivery Process Step 10 Division Engineer's Transmittal Construction Funds Step 19 Execute PPA Step 20 Project Construction Step 15 Execute PED Agreement Step 11

US Army Corps of Engineers

147

Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor - June 2012 Contractor - June 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Contractor - June 2012 June 2012 Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Integrated Waste Treatment Unit Contractor Operational Readiness Review This report documents the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), independent review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project-Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (SBWTP-IWTU) contractor Operational Readiness Review (C-ORR). The review was conducted at the Idaho Site from February 27 to March 6, 2012. This report discusses the background, scope, results, and conclusions of the review, as well as opportunities for improvement (OFIs) and items identified for further

148

SuperTruck Program: Engine Project Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting

149

Advanced Sensors and Instrumentation 2013 ANNUAL PROJECT REVIEW  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Advanced Sensors and Instrumentation Advanced Sensors and Instrumentation 2013 ANNUAL PROJECT REVIEW MEETING SUMMARY Germantown, MD May 21-22, 2013 ASI 2013 Annual Project Review Meeting Summary May 21-22, 2013 1 Introduction The Advanced Sensors and Instrumentation (ASI) element of the Nuclear Energy Enabling Technologies (NEET) Program conducted its first Annual Project Review Meeting on May 21-22, 2013 in Germantown, Maryland with video links to other Department of Energy (DOE) National Laboratory sites. The purpose of the meeting was to review the 10 on-going ASI projects with presentations made by the research principal investigators. The presentations addressed the objectives and expected outcomes of research, and summarized technical performance and accomplishments since project inception. The

150

Independent Oversight Review, Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project - April 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project - April 2013 April 2013 Review of Radiation Protection Program Implementation at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project of the Idaho Site This report documents an independent review of activity-level radiation protection program (RPP) implementation at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) of the Idaho Site, as conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations. The purpose of this Independent Oversight targeted review

151

Response to Director's Review of Fermilab Project Management Improvement Initiatives  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Response to Director's Review of Fermilab Project Management Improvement Initiatives Response to Director's Review of Fermilab Project Management Improvement Initiatives May 14, 2013 Executive Summary Fermilab is entering a new, transitional era defined by the transformation from operating a very large experimental facility over several decades to managing and delivering a portfolio of new projects within technical performance, budget and schedule expectations. Throughout CY12, internal and external reviews identified some systemic weaknesses in execution of some construction activities and fabrication of components, including procurement planning and execution, cost estimating, and internal project communication. These Project Management System concerns have the potential to impact other projects and operational activities at the Laboratory if not addressed. Coincident with the

152

TUCAP-ETO-STATCOM Project Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE ESS ANNUAL PEER REVIEW 110206 ETO Light Power Converter for FACTS & Energy Storage Applications Principal Investigator: Prof Alex Q. Huang Semiconductor Power Electronics...

153

Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

3Q CY2005 (PDF), Facility Representative Program Performance Indicators Quarterly Report Independent Oversight Review, Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site - March 2000...

154

The Global Threat Reduction Initiative's Orphan Source Recovery Project in the Russian Federation  

SciTech Connect

After 9/11, officials at the United States Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) grew more concerned about radiological materials that were vulnerable to theft and illicit use around the world. The concern was that terrorists could combine stolen radiological materials with explosives to build and detonate a radiological dispersal device (RDD), more commonly known as a dirty bomb. In response to this and other terrorist threats, the DOE/NNSA formed what is now known as the Global Threat Reduction Initiative (GTRI) to consolidate and accelerate efforts to reduce and protect vulnerable nuclear and radiological materials located at civilian sites worldwide. Although a cooperative program was already underway in the Russian Federation to secure nuclear materials at a range of different facilities, thousands of sealed radioactive sources remained vulnerable at medical, research, and industrial sites. In response, GTRI began to focus efforts on addressing these materials. GTRIs Russia Orphan Source Recovery Project, managed at the Nevada National Security Sites North Las Vegas facility, was initiated in 2002. Throughout the life of the project, Joint Stock Company Isotope has served as the primary Russian subcontractor, and the organization has proven to be a successful partner. Since the first orphan source recovery of an industrial cobalt-60 irradiator with 647 curies (Ci) at an abandoned facility in Moscow in 2003, the GTRI Orphan Source Recovery Project in the Russian Federation has accomplished substantial levels of threat reduction. To date, GTRI has recovered and securely disposed of more than 5,100 sources totaling more that 628,000 Ci. This project serves as an extraordinary example of how international cooperation can be implemented by partners with mutual interests to achieve significant goals.

Russell, J. W. [NSTec; Ahumada, A. D. [NSTec; Blanchard, T. A. [NNSA

2012-06-04T23:59:59.000Z

155

Focused Review of the River Protection Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

storage and interim stabilization activities to remove liquid wastes from single-shell tanks, as well as to reduce such hazards as flammable hydrogen gas buildup. This review did...

156

Annual Merit Review Evaluates Impact of Sustainable Transportation Projects  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

More than 300 Energy Department activities and projects will be judged by reviewers from a variety of scientific backgrounds this week at the Vehicle Technologies Office and Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting in Washington, D.C., which is free of charge and open to the public.

157

December 6, 2012 2013 Geographic Project Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and Conservation Council (Council) and Bonneville Power Administration (Bonneville) announce the start. Section 4(h)(10)(A) of the Power Act then calls on the Bonneville to use its funds and other authorities areas of the Columbia Basin for Fiscal Years 2014-2018 Dear Project Sponsors: The Northwest Power

158

Forthcoming Projects Peer Review Panel (PPRP) meeting The next meeting of the Projects Peer Review Panel (PPRP) will take place in Council  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Forthcoming Projects Peer Review Panel (PPRP) meeting The next meeting of the Projects Peer Review September 2012, Polaris House, Swindon. The Panel will be reviewing 3 project proposals. Members.Aziz@stfc.ac.uk if they are likely to attend the open sessions. The proposals being reviewed are as follows: 19th September & 20th

159

Forthcoming Projects Peer Review Panel (PPRP) meeting The next meeting of the Projects Peer Review Panel (PPRP) will take place at Council  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Forthcoming Projects Peer Review Panel (PPRP) meeting The next meeting of the Projects Peer Review 2012 The Panel will be reviewing 2 project proposals and 15 PRD applications. Due to the large number of PRD applications being reviewed there will be no open presentations for PRDs. Members of the science

160

A Review of Wind Project Financing Structures in the USA  

SciTech Connect

The rapid pace of wind power development in the U.S. over the last decade has outstripped the ability of most project developers to provide adequate equity capital and make efficient use of project-related tax benefits. In response, the sector has created novel project financing structures that feature varying combinations of equity capital from project developers and third-party tax-oriented investors, and in some cases commercial debt. While their origins stem from variations in the financial capacity and business objectives of wind project developers, as well as the risk tolerances and objectives of equity and debt providers, each structure is, at its core, designed to manage project risk and allocate federal tax incentives to those entities that can use them most efficiently. This article surveys the six principal financing structures through which most new utility-scale wind projects (excluding utility-owned projects) in the U.S. have been financed from 1999 to the present. These structures include simple balance-sheet finance, several varieties of all-equity special allocation partnership 'flip' structures, and two leveraged structures. In addition to describing each structure's mechanics, the article also discusses its rationale for use, the types of investors that find it appealing and why, and its relative frequency of use in the market. The article concludes with a generalized summary of how a developer might choose one structure over another.

Bolinger, Mark A; Harper, John; Karcher, Matthew

2008-09-24T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Developing Renewable Energy Projects Larger Than 10 MWs at Federal Facilities (Book), Large-Scale Renewable Energy Guide, Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

LARGE-SCALE RENEWABLE ENERGY GUIDE LARGE-SCALE RENEWABLE ENERGY GUIDE Developing Renewable Energy Projects Larger Than 10 MWs at Federal Facilities A Practical Guide to Getting Large-Scale Renewable Energy Projects Financed with Private Capital Cover photos, clockwise from the top: Installing mirrored parabolic trough collectors - (January 19, 2012) Crews work around the clock installing mirrored parabolic trough collectors, built on site, that will cover 3 square miles at Abengoa's Solana Plant. Solana a 280 megawatt utility scale solar power plant (CSP) under construction in Gila Bend, Arizona, USA. When finished it will generate 280 MW 's of clean, sustainable power serving over 70,000 Arizona homes. Photo by Dennis Schroeder, NREL 20097 Dry Lake Wind Power Project in Arizona; Suzlon S88 wind turbines - The 63-MW Dry Lake Wind Power Project in Arizona is the first

162

Developing Renewable Energy Projects Larger Than 10 MWs at Federal Facilities (Book), Large-Scale Renewable Energy Guide, Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

LARGE-SCALE RENEWABLE ENERGY GUIDE LARGE-SCALE RENEWABLE ENERGY GUIDE Developing Renewable Energy Projects Larger Than 10 MWs at Federal Facilities A Practical Guide to Getting Large-Scale Renewable Energy Projects Financed with Private Capital Cover photos, clockwise from the top: Installing mirrored parabolic trough collectors - (January 19, 2012) Crews work around the clock installing mirrored parabolic trough collectors, built on site, that will cover 3 square miles at Abengoa's Solana Plant. Solana a 280 megawatt utility scale solar power plant (CSP) under construction in Gila Bend, Arizona, USA. When finished it will generate 280 MW 's of clean, sustainable power serving over 70,000 Arizona homes. Photo by Dennis Schroeder, NREL 20097 Dry Lake Wind Power Project in Arizona; Suzlon S88 wind turbines - The 63-MW Dry Lake Wind Power Project in Arizona is the first

163

EIA-Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

9) 9) Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2009) Each year since 1996, EIA's Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting has produced a comparison between realized energy outcomes and the projections included in previous editions of the AEO. Each year, the comparison adds the projections from the most recent AEO and updates the historical data to the most recently available. The comparison summarizes the relationship of the AEO reference case projections since 1982 to realized outcomes by calculating the average absolute percent differences for several of the major variables for AEO82 through AEO2009. Annual Energy Outlook Restrospective Review, 2009 Report pdf images Table 1. Comparison of Absolute Percent Difference between AEO Reference Case Projections

164

Focused Review of the River Protection Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................... 5 2.0 EVALUATION OF THE CORE FUNCTIONS .......................... 9 2.1 Core Function #1 - Define the Scope of Work ................... 9 2.2 Core Function #2 - Analyze the Hazards......................... 11 2.3 Core Function #3 - Develop and Implement Hazard Controls ............................................................... 13 2.4 Core Function #4 - Perform Work Within Controls ....... 16 2.5 Core Function #5 - Provide Feedback and Continuous Improvement ................................................ 19 3.0 ESSENTIAL SYSTEMS REVIEW ........................................... 26 3.1 Engineering Design and Analysis .................................... 27 3.2 Unreviewed Safety Question Process

165

Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project- October 2010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review of Nuclear Safety Culture at the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project

166

Status Report: EM Acquisition and Project Management Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report: Acquisition and Project Report: Acquisition and Project Management Review August 15, 2006 Submitted by: Mr. James Ajello and Mr. Dennis Ferrigno Background: The Environmental Management Advisory Board is in the process of providing Jack Surash, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Acquisition and Project Management (EM-50), records of past EMAB recommendations and commentary. Mr. Ajello and Mr. Ferrigno believe that the records will be helpful to Mr. Surash and his staff. EMAB has identified the following actionable items: Provide Mr. Surash with EMAB committee files for review Have Mr. Ferrigno contact Mr. Surash to arrange a meeting for discussion of said materials Have Mr. Ajello and Mr. Ferrigno meet with Mr. Surash periodically to discuss project management and contract issues, as per request of EM-1.

167

EIA-Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

8) 8) Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2008) Each year since 1996, EIA's Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting has produced a comparison between realized energy outcomes and the projections included in previous editions of the AEO. Each year, the comparison adds the projections from the most recent AEO and updates the historical data to the most recently available. The comparison summarizes the relationship of the AEO reference case projections since 1982 to realized outcomes by calculating the average absolute percent differences for several of the major variables for AEO82 through AEO2008. Annual Energy Outlook Restrospective Review, 2008 Report Revisions to Gross Domestic Product and Implications for the Comparisons

168

Federal and State Structures to Support Financing Utility-Scale Solar Projects and the Business Models Designed to Utilize Them  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal and State Structures to Federal and State Structures to Support Financing Utility-Scale Solar Projects and the Business Models Designed to Utilize Them Michael Mendelsohn and Claire Kreycik Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-48685 April 2012 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, Colorado 80401 303-275-3000 * www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Federal and State Structures to Support Financing Utility-Scale Solar Projects and the Business Models Designed to Utilize Them Michael Mendelsohn and Claire Kreycik Prepared under Task No. CP09.2320

169

Special Review of the Rocky Flats Closure Project Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April April 2001 Special Review of the Integrated Safety Management ISM OVERSIGHT Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................... 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 6 2.0 FOCUSED REVIEW OF THE INTEGRATED WORK CONTROL PROCESS AND LINE MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT .............................................................................................. 8 2.1 Background ...................................................................................... 8 2.2 Line Management Oversight and Selected Other Management Systems .................................................................... 10 2.3 Rocky Flats Closure Project Integrated Work Control Process

170

M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Federal Energy Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Document describes the Federal Energy Management Program's (FEMP) standard procedures and guidelines for measurement and verification (M&V) for federal energy managers, procurement officials, and energy service providers.

171

ARRA FEMP Technical Assistance -- Federal Aviation Administration Project 209 -- Control Tower and Support Building, Palm Springs, CA  

SciTech Connect

This report represents findings of a design review team that evaluated construction documents (at the 100% level) and operating specifications for a new control tower and support building that will be built in Palm Springs, California by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The focus of the review was to identify measures that could be incorporated into the final design and operating specifications that would result in additional energy savings for the FAA that would not have otherwise occurred.

Arends, J.; Sandusky, William F.

2010-03-31T23:59:59.000Z

172

M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Federal Energy Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

FEMP's standard procedures and guidelines for M&V for federal energy managers, procurement officials, and energy service providers.

173

EIA-Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review-Evaluation of Projections in  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

8) 8) The Energy Information Administration (EIA) produces projections of energy supply and demand each year in the Annual Energy Outlook (AEO). The projections in the AEO are not statements of what will happen but of what might happen, given the assumptions and methodologies used. The projections are business-as-usual trend projections, given known technology, technological and demographic trends, and current laws and regulations. The potential impacts of pending or proposed legislation, regulations, and standards-or of sections of legislation that have been enacted but that require implementing regulations or appropriation of funds that are not provided or specified in the legislation itself-are not reflected in the projections. The AEO is based on only then current Federal and State laws and regulations. Thus, the AEO provides a policy-neutral reference case that can be used to analyze policy initiatives. The analyses in the AEO primarily focuses on a reference case, lower and higher economic growth cases, and lower and higher energy price cases. However, more than 30 alternative cases are generally included in the AEO. Readers are encouraged to review the full range of cases, which address many of the uncertainties inherent in long-term projections.

174

SRS Waste Solidification Building Project Peer Review, July 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SRS-2011-07-15 SRS-2011-07-15 Site: Savannah River Site, NA-26 Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Waste Solidification Building Project Peer Review Dates of Activity : 07/12/2011 - 07/15/2011 Report Preparer: James Lockridge Activity Description/Purpose: At the request of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Office of Enterprise Project Management (NA- APM-20), the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), provided an expert to review the Waste Solidification Building (WSB) startup programs and procedures associated with worker safety and health, environment, and security. Criteria for the review was detailed in the Criteria,

175

DOE Issues Environmental Assessment on Road Project for Public Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Brad Bugger (208) 526-0833 DOE Issues Environmental Assessment on Road Project for Public Review Brad Bugger (208) 526-0833 DOE Issues Environmental Assessment on Road Project for Public Review The U.S. Department of Energy has issued for public review and comment a draft environmental assessment of the potential environmental impacts of building an internal road to safely ship radioactive material within the Idaho National Laboratory. DOE�s preferred alternative under the environmental assessment is to develop a new, internal road that would connect the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center with the Materials and Fuels Complex, a distance of about 20 miles. It would allow the INL to safely ship nuclear materials from the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center and the Materials and Fuels Complex without having to utilize public roads, like Highway 20, which adds additional cost and security considerations to each shipment.

176

Baseline review of the U.S. LHC Accelerator project  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy (DOE) Review of the U.S. Large Hadron Collider (LHC) Accelerator project was conducted February 23--26, 1998, at the request of Dr. John R. O`Fallon, Director, Division of High Energy Physics, Office of Energy Research, U.S. DOE. This is the first review of the U.S. LHC Accelerator project. Overall, the Committee found that the U.S. LHC Accelerator project effort is off to a good start and that the proposed scope is very conservative for the funding available. The Committee recommends that the project be initially baselined at a total cost of $110 million, with a scheduled completion data of 2005. The U.S. LHC Accelerator project will supply high technology superconducting magnets for the interaction regions (IRs) and the radio frequency (rf) straight section of the LHC intersecting storage rings. In addition, the project provides the cryogenic support interface boxes to service the magnets and radiation absorbers to protect the IR dipoles and the inner triplet quadrupoles. US scientists will provide support in analyzing some of the detailed aspects of accelerator physics in the two rings. The three laboratories participating in this project are Brookhaven National Laboratory, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab), and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. The Committee was very impressed by the technical capabilities of the US LHC Accelerator project team. Cost estimates for each subsystem of the US LHC Accelerator project were presented to the Review Committee, with a total cost including contingency of $110 million (then year dollars). The cost estimates were deemed to be conservative. A re-examination of the funding profile, costs, and schedules on a centralized project basis should lead to an increased list of deliverables. The Committee concluded that the proposed scope of US deliverables to CERN can be readily accomplished with the $110 million total cost baseline for the project. The current deliverables should serve as the baseline scope with the firm expectation that additional scope will be restored to the baseline as the project moves forward. The Committee supports the FY 1998 work plan and scope of deliverables but strongly recommends the reevaluation of costs and schedules with the goal of producing a plan for restoring the US deliverables to CERN. This plan should provide precise dates when scope decisions must be made.

NONE

1998-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

177

Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds This Environmental Protection Agency report contains recommendations for a series of environmental actions, including those to increase environmental and economically beneficial landscaping practices at Federal facilities and federally funded projects. Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds More Documents & Publications Pollution Prevention - Environmental Impact Reduction Checklists for NEPA/309 Reviewers Memorandum to Heads of Federal Departments and Agencies Regarding Pollution Prevention and the National Environmental Policy Act EIS-0488: EPA Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact

178

Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds This Environmental Protection Agency report contains recommendations for a series of environmental actions, including those to increase environmental and economically beneficial landscaping practices at Federal facilities and federally funded projects. Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds More Documents & Publications Pollution Prevention - Environmental Impact Reduction Checklists for NEPA/309 Reviewers Memorandum to Heads of Federal Departments and Agencies Regarding Pollution Prevention and the National Environmental Policy Act Executive Order 13148-Greening the Government Through Leadership in

179

Independent Oversight Targeted Review of the Safety Significant Blast Door and Personnel Door Interlock Systems and Review of Federal Assurance Capability at the Pantex Plant, December 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Targeted Review of the Targeted Review of the Safety Significant Blast Door and Personnel Door Interlock Systems and Review of Federal Assurance Capability at the Pantex Plant December 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Scope.................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background........................................................................................................................................... 2

180

DOE/EA-1635: Environmental Assessment for Pre-approval Review Williston to Tioga Transmission Line Project (March 2010)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Assessment for Pre-approval Review DOE/EA - 1635 Williston to Tioga Transmission Line Project Environmental Assessment for Pre-approval Review DOE/EA - 1635 Williston to Tioga Transmission Line Project Environmental Assessment for Pre-approval Review DOE/EA - 1635 March 2010 Acronyms and Abbreviations °C degrees Celsius AAQS Ambient Air Quality Standards AIRFA American Indian Religious Freedom Act of 1978 amsl above mean sea level APLIC Avian Power Line Interaction Committee BEPC Basin Electric Power Cooperative BFE Base Flood Elevation BGEPA Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act BMP best management practice CFR Code of Federal Regulations CO 2 carbon dioxide Council Advisory Council on Historic Preservation CRP Conservation Reserve Program

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Request for Information seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal authorizations. This notice announces an extension of the public comment period for submitting comments regarding the IIP Process to October 31, 2013. Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting

182

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Request for Information seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal authorizations. This notice announces an extension of the public comment period for submitting comments regarding the IIP Process to October 31, 2013. Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting

183

USING HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGERY TO ASSIST FEDERAL FOREST MONITORING AND RESTORATION PROJECTS IN THE SOUTHERN ROCKY MOUNTAINS, COLORADO  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

catastrophic wildfires. Many of the restoration techniques that were proposed do not differ greatly from what is currently being applied by various governmental agencies in Colorado. The most relevant research publications related to forest monitoring... USING HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGERY TO ASSIST FEDERAL FOREST MONITORING AND RESTORATION PROJECTS IN THE SOUTHERN ROCKY MOUNTAINS, COLORADO BY Kyle Wamser Submitted to the graduate degree program in Department of Geography and the Faculty...

Wamser, William Kyle

2012-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

184

PROJECTS FROM FEDERAL REGION IX DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY APPROPRIATE ENERGY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM PART II  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Facility Project Results: Energy Savings: The solar systemProject Results: Energy Savings: According to SolarSolar Energy For Composting Toilets .. 19 CA-682. Dry Creek Rancheria Solar Demonstration Project ..

Case, C.W.

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

185

PROJECTS FROM FEDERAL REGION IX DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY APPROPRIATE ENERGY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM PART II  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

o o o o Projects: Arizona California CA-173. Solar AquaDomeFrancisco, California Project Txpe: Award: SOLAR AQUADOMEOccidental, California P_roject T;:Ee: Award: SOLAR ENERGY

Case, C.W.

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

186

PROJECTS FROM FEDERAL REGION IX DOE APPROPRIATE ENERGY TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAM - PART I  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

alternative energy educational program, Project SAW: Solar -Solar Energy Research Commission are interested in the program. Projectsolar energy. Award: Pro ect Term: ect Descr 14 months (Project

Case, C.W.

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

187

A Review of Wind Project Financing Structures in the USA  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of Federal production tax credits (PTCs), and can also1: The Federal Production Tax Credit As authorized by theCode provides a production tax credit for power generated by

Bolinger, Mark A

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

188

Review of the Hanford Sludge Treatment Project, February 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

HSS Independent Activity Report - Rev. 0 Report Number: HIAR-RL-2012-02-27 Site: DOE-Richland Operations Office Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Sludge Treatment Project Dates of Activity : 02/27/2012 - 03/01/2012 Report Preparer: Jake Wechselberger Activity Description/Purpose: The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed operational awareness reviews of the Sludge Treatment Project (STP), Engineered Container Retrieval and Transfer System (ECRTS) during site visits. Result: During the period February 27 - March 1, 2012, an HSS representative attended the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

189

Review of the Hanford Sludge Treatment Project, February 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

HSS Independent Activity Report - Rev. 0 Report Number: HIAR-RL-2012-02-27 Site: DOE-Richland Operations Office Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Sludge Treatment Project Dates of Activity : 02/27/2012 - 03/01/2012 Report Preparer: Jake Wechselberger Activity Description/Purpose: The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed operational awareness reviews of the Sludge Treatment Project (STP), Engineered Container Retrieval and Transfer System (ECRTS) during site visits. Result: During the period February 27 - March 1, 2012, an HSS representative attended the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

190

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Honeywell Federal Manufacturing and Technologies- September 2008  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Evaluation to determine whether Honeywell Federal Manufacturing and Technologies / New Mexico is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

191

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Honeywell Federal Manufacturing and Technologies- November 2008  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Evaluation to determine whether Honeywell Federal Manufacturing and Technologies' Kansas City Plant is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

192

A literature review of the market effects of federal biofuel policy and recommendations for future policy.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

??The United States has had a federal biofuels policy since the 1970s. The purpose of this policy was to help the development of a biofuel (more)

Ayers, Alex

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

193

Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Information on Improving Performance of Federal Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 168 - August 29, 2013 Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 168 - August 29, 2013 The Department of Energy's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, in collaboration with the Member Agencies of the Steering Committee (Member Agencies) created under Executive Order 13604 of March 22, 2012, and pursuant to the June 7, 2013 Transmission Presidential Memorandum, is seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal Authorization(s).

194

Columbia River System Operation Review on Selecting an Operating Strategy for the Federal Columbia River Power System; 21Feb1997  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Bonneville Power Administration Columbia River System Operation Review on Selecting an Operating Strategy for the Federal Columbia River Power System (FCRPS) AGENCY: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), Department of Energy (DOE) ACTION: Record of Decision (ROD) SUMMARY: The Columbia River System Operation Review (SOR) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) assessed operations at the 14 Federal dams and reservoirs on the Columbia and lower Snake Rivers that have a major influence on the multiple purpose system operation, and for which power production is coordinated under the Pacific Northwest Coordination Agreement. Lead agencies for this six-year process were the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation

195

EIS-0170: Columbia River System Operation Review, BPA Area  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Columbia River System Operation Review Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) evaluates the potential impacts of four alternatives that represent the likely range of allocations between the Federal and non-Federal projects.

196

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

STATES OF AMERICA STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Reedsport OPT Wave Park, LLC Project No. 12713-002 Oregon NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (December 3, 2010) In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission or FERC's) regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed Reedsport OPT Wave Park, LLC's application for license for the Reedsport OPT Wave Park Project

197

Bill McMillan named federal project director for ORNL cleanup...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for the Uranium-233 Disposition Project. McMillan holds a bachelor's degree in biology from the College of Charleston and a master's degree in environmental systems...

198

Memo Issuance of EM Capital and Major Operating Project Standard Review Plan Edition Two  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MAR 2 4 201011 MAR 2 4 201011 MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION FROM: DR. STEVEN L. KRAHN DEPUTY ASSISTANT SAFETY AND SECU EIVVIROIVMENTAL MANAGEMENT SUBJECT: Issuance of Environmental Management Capital and Major Operating Project Standard Review Plan Edition Two The Office of Environmental Management (EM) is responsible for managing the design, construction, operation, and eventual disposition of mission critical projects/facilities. Effective management of these projects requires multiple disciplines to be integrated and engaged at various project lifecycle phases. These disciplines include project management, engineering, design, safety, environment, safeguards and security, and quality assurance. The lessons-learned to date from ongoing Headquarters (HQ) and Field project reviews [e.g., Construction Project

199

Review of PV Inverter Technology Cost and Performance Projections  

SciTech Connect

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) has a major responsibility in the implementation of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Solar Energy Technologies Program. Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) has a major role in supporting inverter development, characterization, standards, certifications, and verifications. The Solar Energy Technologies Program recently published a Multiyear Technical Plan, which establishes a goal of reducing the Levelized Energy Cost (LEC) for photovoltaic (PV) systems to $0.06/kWh by 2020. The Multiyear Technical Plan estimates that, in order to meet the PV system goal, PV inverter prices will need to decline to $0.25-0.30 Wp by 2020. DOE determined the need to conduct a rigorous review of the PV Program's technical and economic targets, including the target set for PV inverters. NREL requested that Navigant Consulting Inc.(NCI) conduct a review of historical and projected cost and performance improvements for PV inverters, including identification of critical barriers identified and the approaches government might use to address them.

Navigant Consulting Inc.

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

200

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09 09 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 99 / Thursday, May 22, 1997 / Notices collection on the respondents, including through the use of information technology. Dated: May 16, 1997. Gloria Parker, Director, Information Resources Management Group. Office of Management Type of Review: New. Title: Department of Education Federal Cash Award Certification Statement and Department of Education Federal Cash Quarterly Confirmation Statement. Frequency: Annually. Affected Public: Business or other for- profit; Not for Profit institutions; Federal Government; State, Local or Tribal Government, SEAs or LEAs. Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour Burden: Responses: 12,000. Burden Hours: 38,160. Abstract: The collection of the Federal Cash Award Statement is necessary for the Agency to monitor cash advanced to

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Federal assistance program. Geothermal technology transfer. Project status report, May 1986  

SciTech Connect

Progress for the month of May, 1986, is described. Projects include evaluation of direct heating of greenhouses and other businesses, technology transfer to consultants, developers and users, and program monitor activities. (ACR)

Lienau, P.J.; Culver, G.

1986-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

202

SC Projects | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Projects Projects Project Assessment (OPA) OPA Home About Project Management SC Projects Review Dates (updated November 2013) Project Construction Photos Other Links SC Federal Project Directors (FPD) and FPD Resources Contact Information Project Assessment U.S. Department of Energy SC-28/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4840 F: (301) 903-8520 E: sc.opa@science.doe.gov SC Projects Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page SC Projects-Contains information regarding SC projects including project review dates, information on Office of Science Certified Federal Project Directors and Defining the Leadership Traits/Skill Set for a Successful Federal Project Director, and project photos or links to project photo sites. Last modified: 3/18/2013 10:54:36

203

CAMPUS PLANNING COMMITTEE PLANNING AND REVIEW PROCESS FOR MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECTS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

CAMPUS PLANNING COMMITTEE PLANNING AND REVIEW PROCESS FOR MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECTS (Revised June 2011) ___________________________________________________________________________________________ I. INTRODUCTION An effective major capital planning and review process will: Encourage appropriate planning objectives of the campus are appropriately coordinated and facilitate the successful

California at Santa Barbara, University of

204

Federal Energy Management Success Stories  

Energy Savers (EERE)

6 Federal Energy Management Success Stories en FEMP Helps Federal Facilities Develop Large-Scale Renewable Energy Projects http:energy.goveeresuccess-storiesarticles...

205

M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Federal Energy...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Federal Energy Projects M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Federal Energy Projects Document describes the Federal...

206

DOE Hydrogen Delivery Analysis and High Pressure Tanks R&D Project Review Meeting Agenda  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

DOE Hydrogen Delivery Analysis and High Pressure Tanks R&D Project Review Meeting Agenda, held February 8-9, 2005 by Argonne National Laboratory

207

VOLUNTARY PROTECTION PROGRAM ONSITE REVIEW, Fluor Federal Services Richland, Washington February 26- March 2, 2001  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This report summarizes the results of the HSS DOE-VPP Teams evaluation of Fluor Federal Services Richland, Washington during the period of February 26 - March 2, 2001, and provides the Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer with the necessary information to make the final decision regarding the companys continued participation in DOE-VPP as a Star site.

208

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Energy and Federal Energy and Water Management Awards to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management Awards on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management Awards on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management Awards on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management Awards on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management Awards on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management Awards on AddThis.com... Project Assistance Training Outreach Awards for Saving Energy Federal Energy and Water Management Better Buildings Federal Award

209

Final Independent External Peer Review for the Biscayne Bay Coastal Wetlands Project  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Final Independent External Peer Review for the Biscayne Bay Coastal Wetlands Project Implementation-TERM ANALYSIS SERVICE (STAS) on Final Independent External Peer Review Report Biscayne Bay Coastal Wetlands COASTAL WETLANDS PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Biscayne Bay Coastal Wetlands (BBCW

US Army Corps of Engineers

210

Realized and projected impacts of U.S. federal efficiency standards for residential appliances  

SciTech Connect

This study estimated energy, environmental and consumer economic impacts of U.S. Federal residential energy efficiency standards that became effective in the 1988-2001 period or will take effect by the end of 2007. These standards have been the subject of in-depth analyses conducted as part of DOE's standards rulemaking process. This study drew on those analyses, but updated certain data and developed a common framework and assumptions for all of the products. We estimate that the considered standards will reduce residential primary energy consumption and CO{sub 2} emissions in 2020 by 8-9% compared to the levels expected without any standards. They will save a cumulative total of 25-30 quads by the year 2015, and 60 quads by 2030. The estimated cumulative net present value of consumer benefit amounts to nearly $80 billion by 2015, and grows to $130 billion by 2030. The overall benefit/cost ratio of cumulative consumer impacts in the 1987-2050 period is 2.75:1. The cumulative cost of DOE's program to establish and implement the standards is in the range of $200-250 million.

Meyers, Stephen; McMahon, James; McNeil, Michael; Liu, Xiaomin

2002-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

211

Status Review of Wildlife Mitigation, Columbia Basin Hydroelectric Projects, Columbia River Mainstem Facilities, 1984 Final Report.  

SciTech Connect

This report reviews the status of past, present, and proposed future wildlife planning and mitigation programs at existing hydroelectric projects in the Columbia River Basin. The project evaluations will form the basis for determining any needed remedial measures or additional project analysis. Each hydropower facility report is abstracted separately for inclusion in the Energy Data Base.

Howerton, Jack; Hwang, Diana

1984-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

212

Energy Design Assistance Project Tracker- 2014 BTO Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presenter: Larry Brackney, National Renewable Energy Laboratory The Energy Design Assistance Program Tracker (EDAPT) tracks and manages projects, performs automated quality checks of energy model designs, and generates project documentation and reports for commercial buildings.

213

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Idaho Cleanup Project- October 2010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Evaluation to determine whether Idaho Cleanup Project is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

214

DOE Hydrogen Pipeline R&D Project Review Meeting | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Infrastructure Project, Paul Wang, Concurrent Technologies Corporation (partners: Air Products, Resource Dynamics Corp., EDO Fiber Science) Natural Gas Utilities Options...

215

CAMPUS PLANNING COMMITTEE PLANNING AND REVIEW PROCESS FOR MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECTS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

CAMPUS PLANNING COMMITTEE PLANNING AND REVIEW PROCESS FOR MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECTS (Revised September. INTRODUCTION · An effective major capital planning and review process will: · Encourage appropriate provided to CPC- January · Review of 2-3 Alternative Plans prepared in consultation with CCP- February

California at Santa Barbara, University of

216

Revealing the Hidden Value that the Federal Investment Tax Credit and Treasury Cash Grant Provide To Community Wind Projects  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

the Federal Production Tax Credit to Build a Durable Marketthe Federal Investment Tax Credit and Treasury Cash Granteither a 30% investment tax credit (ITC) or a 30% cash grant

Bolinger, Mark A.

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

217

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) FEMP Technical Assistance Federal Aviation Administration Project 209 Control Tower and Support Building Oakland, CA  

SciTech Connect

This report represents findings of a design review team that evaluated construction documents (at the 70% level) and operating specifications for a new control tower and support building that will be build at Oakland, California by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The focus of the review was to identify measures that could be incorporated into the final design and operating specification that would result in additional energy savings for the FAA that would not have otherwise occurred.

Arends, J.; Sandusky, William F.

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

218

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) FEMP Technical Assistance Federal Aviation Administration Project 209 - Control Tower and Support Building, Las Vegas, NV  

SciTech Connect

This report represents findings of a design review team that evaluated construction documents (at the 70% level) and operating specifications for a new control tower and support building that will be built in Las Vegas, Nevada by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The focus of the review was to identify measures that could be incorporated into the final design and operating specification that would result in additional energy savings for the FAA that would not have otherwise occurred.

Arends, J.; Sandusky, William F.

2010-03-31T23:59:59.000Z

219

MSG MONTICELLO PROJECTS FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT REPORT March!April2005  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

March!April2005 March!April2005 Report Period: March 1 - April30, 2005 DOE Project Coordinator: Art Kleinrath HIGHLIGHTS Semi-annual ground water and surface water samples were collected during the week of April4, in accordance with the Monticello Mill Tailings Site Operational Unit III Post- Record of Decision Monitoring Plan. DOE initiated biomonitoring at the wetland areas on the former millsite and down-gradient at the sediment pond as required by the Record of Decision for the Monticello Mill Tailings (USDOE) Site Operable Unit Ill, Swface and Ground Water, Monticello, Utah (May 2004). MRAP DOE submitted the final 2004 Annual Inspection of the Monticello Mill Tailings (USDOE) and Monticello Radioactively Contaminated Properties Sites to the Environmental Protection

220

Federal Sector Renewable Energy Project Implementation: "What's Working and Why"Implementation: What s Working and Why  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

/year Federal Tax Credits CO (Xcel Energy) CO (Xcel Energy) 30% ITC, ACRS "Behind the meter" Sale of Power

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Review and Selection of Research Projects | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Review and Selection of Research Projects Review and Selection of Research Projects High Energy Physics (HEP) HEP Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of HEP Funding Opportunities Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Merit / Review Policies Early Career Research Opportunities in High Energy Physics Graduate Fellows in High Energy Theory Guidelines Advisory Committees News & Resources Contact Information High Energy Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-25/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3624 F: (301) 903-2597 E: sc.hep@science.doe.gov More Information » Peer Merit / Review Policies Review and Selection of Research Projects Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page All research projects supported by the Office of High Energy Physics (HEP)

222

Federal assistance program. Quarterly project progress report, January 1998--March 1998  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes geothermal technical assistance, R&D and technology transfer activities of the Geo-Heat Center at Oregon Institute of Technology for the second quarter of FY-98-98 (January-March, 1998). It describes 268 contacts with parties during this period related to technical assistance with geothermal direct heat projects. Areas dealt with include requests for general information including maps and material for high school debates, and material on geothermal heat pumps, resource and well data, spacing heating and cooling, greenhouses, aquaculture, equipment, district heating, resorts and spas, industrial applications, electric power and snow melting. Research activities include work on model construction specifications for line shaft submersible pumps and plate heat exchangers and a comprehensive aquaculture developer package. The revised Geothermal Direct Use Engineering and Design Guidebooks was completed, published and is available for distribution. Outreach activities include the publication of the Quarterly Bulletin (Vol. 19, No. 1) which was devoted entirely to geothermal equipment, dissemination of information mainly through mailings of publications, tours of local geothermal uses, geothermal library acquisitions and use, participation in workshops, short courses and technical meetings by the staff, and progress monitor reports on geothermal activities.

NONE

1998-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

223

Review of Nuclear Safety Culture at the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project, October 2010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review of Nuclear Safety Culture at the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project, October 2010

224

Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Savings Performance Contracts  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Contracts Contracts Getting Started Federal agencies new to the ESPC process should review the ESPC Overview, the FEMP Assistance Guide, and the FAQs. Case studies are also available. When you are ready to get started, contact a FEMP financing specialist. Energy savings performance contracts (ESPCs) allow Federal agencies to complete energy-savings projects without up-front capital costs and special Congressional appropriations. An ESPC is a partnership between a Federal agency and an energy service company (ESCO). The ESCO conducts a comprehensive energy audit of Federal facilities and identifies improvements to save energy. In consultation with the Federal agency, the ESCO designs and constructs a project that meets the agency's needs and arranges the necessary funding. The ESCO guarantees that the improvements will generate energy cost savings to pay for the project over the term of the contract (up to 25 years). After the contract ends, all additional cost savings accrue to the agency.

225

Formal design review report project W-151 mixer pump procurement  

SciTech Connect

A formal design review for WHC-S-0040 was held on January 21, 1993. The review was completed January 29, 1993. No outstanding action items existed. Comments were recorded on Record Comment Record (RCR) forms and incorporated into the specification. The specification was considered acceptable, approved and issued as WHC-S-0040, Rev. 0 on March 4, 1993.

Crass, D.W.

1997-01-21T23:59:59.000Z

226

DOE Hydrogen Delivery High-Pressure Tanks and Analysis Project Review Meeting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On February 8-9, 2005, the Department of Energy held the DOE Hydrogen Delivery High-Pressure Tanks and Analysis Project Review Meeting at Argonne National Laboratory. The purpose of the meeting was...

227

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: EV Project: Solar-Assisted Charging Demo  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about the EV project:...

228

DSW Power Projects  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Power Projects Contact DSW Customers Customer Meetings Environmental Review-NEPA Operations & Maintenance Planning & Projects Power Marketing Power Projects Contact DSW Customers Customer Meetings Environmental Review-NEPA Operations & Maintenance Planning & Projects Power Marketing Rates DSW Power Projects Boulder Canyon: Straddling the Colorado River near the Arizona-Nevada border, Hoover Dam in Boulder Canyon creates Lake Mead. River waters turning turbines at Hoover Powerplant produce about 2,074 MW--enough electricity for nearly 8 million people. Western markets this power to public utilities in Arizona, California and Nevada over 53.30 circuit-miles of transmission line. Central Arizona: Authorized in 1968, the Central Arizona Project in Arizona and western New Mexico was built to improve water resources in the Colorado River Basin. Segments of the authorization allowed for Federal participation in the Navajo Generating Station. The Federal share of the powerplant's combined capacity is 547 MW.

229

Federal Budgeting Process | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Budgeting Process Federal Budgeting Process Federal Budgeting Process September 11, 2013 8:30AM EDT to September 12, 2013 4:00PM EDT Registration link: CHRIS (000412/0031) $400.00 Course type: Classroom Course Location: DOE Headquarters, Forrestal Building, Washington, DC / WCF-GH-043 Course Description: This course is designed for experienced program and project managers to acquire a working knowledge of DOE's financial and managerial systems to accomplish the Department's budgeting and accounting processes. Processes include preparing, reviewing, presenting, and defending budget submissions. Foundation skills are taught in this course that are required to manage a DOE project through its financial life cycle, including managing the flow of funds to programs and projects, validating

230

Final Independent External Peer Review Report for the Savannah Harbor Expansion Project  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

for the Savannah Harbor Expansion Project General Reevaluation Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Savannah Harbor is a deep and 600 feet wide from deep water in the ocean (River Mile 11.4B) to the channel between the jettiesFinal Independent External Peer Review Report for the Savannah Harbor Expansion Project General

US Army Corps of Engineers

231

Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Generation Projects on Federal Lands Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects on Federal Lands Presentation covers regulatory considerations for developing...

232

CEQ Releases Two Handbooks on Improving Efficiency of Federal Environmental  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CEQ Releases Two Handbooks on Improving Efficiency of Federal CEQ Releases Two Handbooks on Improving Efficiency of Federal Environmental Reviews CEQ Releases Two Handbooks on Improving Efficiency of Federal Environmental Reviews March 5, 2013 - 4:43pm Addthis The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) today released two new handbooks that encourage more efficient environmental reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The first handbook, created by CEQ and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), provides advice to Federal agencies, applicants, project sponsors, and consultants on how to take advantage of existing regulatory provisions to align the NEPA process and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Section 106 review process. The handbook explains how to align NEPA and NHPA Section 106 processes for maximum efficiency and

233

CEQ Releases Two Handbooks on Improving Efficiency of Federal Environmental  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CEQ Releases Two Handbooks on Improving Efficiency of Federal CEQ Releases Two Handbooks on Improving Efficiency of Federal Environmental Reviews CEQ Releases Two Handbooks on Improving Efficiency of Federal Environmental Reviews March 5, 2013 - 4:43pm Addthis The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) today released two new handbooks that encourage more efficient environmental reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The first handbook, created by CEQ and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), provides advice to Federal agencies, applicants, project sponsors, and consultants on how to take advantage of existing regulatory provisions to align the NEPA process and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Section 106 review process. The handbook explains how to align NEPA and NHPA Section 106 processes for maximum efficiency and

234

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partnership Working Group The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) establishes partnerships and facilitates communications among Federal agencies, utilities, and energy service companies. The group develops strategies to implement cost-effective energy efficiency and water conservation projects through utility incentive programs at Federal sites. The mission and objectives of the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group are to: Enhance existing or foster new partnerships between Federal agencies and their servicing utilities to identify, develop, and implement cost-effective energy efficiency, water conservation, and renewable energy projects at Federal sites Identify how utilities can help Federal agencies meet energy management goals required by legislation

235

DOE's Policy Regarding Laboratories, Plants and Sites Engaging in Strategic Partnership Projects with Other Federal Agencies, Independent Organizations, and the Private Sector  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The purpose of this Policy is to set the context in which DOE and its laboratories, plants, and sites should pursue Strategic Partnership Projects (SSP) with other Federal government agencies, state and local institutions, universities, foreign entities and/or private companies. The Policy is applicable to the DOE laboratories, plants, and sites, and to the DOE programs that own them and facilitate their work.

2014-12-17T23:59:59.000Z

236

Data Review of the Hot Dry Rock Project at Fenton Hill, New Mexico  

SciTech Connect

This report reviews the data collected during the hot dry rock experimental project conducted by the US Department of Energy and Los Alamos National Laboratory at Fenton Hill, New Mexico from about 1971 through 1995. Five main categories of data were reviewed: (1) geologic data; (2) flow test data; (3) reservoir modeling data; (4) chemical tracer data; and (5) seismic data. The review determines the important data sets from the project, determines where and how these data are stored, and evaluates whether further analyses of the data might be likely to yield additional information valuable to the geothermal industry or to the further development of enhanced geothermal systems.

GeothermEx, Inc.

1998-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

237

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

893 893 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 158 / Friday, August 15, 2003 / Notices Title: Comprehensive Program Annual Performance Report. Frequency: One time. Affected Public: Not-for-profit institutions. Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour Burden: Responses: 140. Burden Hours: 2,800. Abstract: The Comprehensive Program is a discretionary grant program that makes competitive awards to support reform and innovations through projects that improve educational practice at the postsecondary level. Grantees annually submit a performance report to demonstrate that substantial progress is being made toward meeting the objectives of their projects. Reporting requirements are currently based on broad criteria from the Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR). This request is to

238

A Review of the NGNP Project: February 2006 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A Review of the NGNP Project: February 2006 A Review of the NGNP Project: February 2006 A Review of the NGNP Project: February 2006 In 2002, the Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy completed a technology roadmap project that provided an overall plan to the broad vision of enhancing the future role of nuclear energy systems in the United States and the world at large. This Technology Roadmap focused on the development of advanced nuclear systems, so-called Generation IV systems, which meet profram foals of improved safety and economics, as well as enhanced sustainability and minimization of the risks from proliferation. This Gen-IV Technology Roadmap defined the lead reactor concepts and their associated fuel cycles to be pursued, as well as the R&D plan to develop the base technology for these reactor concepts and their complete fuel

239

EIA-Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review-Evaluation of Projections in  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006)* Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006)* The Energy Information Administration (EIA) produces projections of energy supply and demand each year in the Annual Energy Outlook (AEO). The projections in the AEO are not statements of what will happen but of what might happen, given the assumptions and methodologies used. The projections are business-as-usual trend projections, given known technology, technological and demographic trends, and current laws and regulations. The potential impacts of pending or proposed legislation, regulations, and standards-or of sections of legislation that have been enacted but that require implementing regulations or appropriation of funds that are not provided or specified in the legislation itself-are not reflected in the projections, although there are a few exceptions. It is assumed that current laws and regulations that have sunset dates, but which are regularly renewed, are extended for modeling purposes. Thus, the AEO generally provides a policy-neutral reference case that can be used to analyze policy initiatives. While the analyses in the AEO focus primarily on a reference case, lower and higher economic growth cases, and lower and higher energy price cases; more than 30 alternative cases are generally included in the AEO. Readers are encouraged to review the full range of cases, which address many of the uncertainties inherent in long-term projections.

240

Funding Mechanisms for Federal Geothermal Permitting (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect

This presentation is about the GRC paper, which discusses federal agency revenues received for geothermal projects and potential federal agency budget sources for processing geothermal applications.

Witherbee, K.

2014-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Sustainable Federal Fleets Catalog of Services  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Document details the Federal Energy Management Program's catalog of technical assistance services it offers for federal agencies that want to implement sustainable fleet projects.

242

Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Savings Performance Contract  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Training Training The Federal Energy Management Program offers training to help Federal agencies implement energy savings performance contracts (ESPCs). Introduction to Alternative Financing for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy: Covers the use of project funding tools to plan and implement energy and water saving measures and renewable energy systems in Federal facilities. Recorded June 29, 2010. Introduction to Energy Savings Performance Contracts: Outlines how ESPCs can help Federal agencies implement renewable energy, energy efficiency, and water efficiency projects. Recorded June 30, 2010. Financing and Pricing Evaluation for Energy Savings Performance Contracts: Offers a brief overview of costs and pricing review of the ESPC final proposal and how ESPCs can fund the reduction of Federal facility energy use and costs. Recorded July 7, 2010.

243

Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Coordination in Federal...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Coordination in Federal Agency Review of Electric Transmission Facilities on Federal Land, October 23, 2009 Memorandum of Understanding...

244

Independent management and financial review, Yucca Mountain Project, Nevada. Final report  

SciTech Connect

The Yucca Mountain Project is one part of the Department of Energy`s Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Program (the Program) which was established by the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, and as amended in 1987. The Program`s goal is to site the nation`s first geologic repository for the permanent disposal of high-level nuclear waste, in the form of spent fuel rod assemblies, generated by the nuclear power industry and a smaller quantity of Government radioactive waste. The Program, which also encompasses the transportation system and the multipurpose canister system was not the subject of this Report. The subject of this Review was only the Yucca Mountain Project in Nevada. While the Review was directed toward the Yucca Mountain Project rather than the Program as a whole, there are certain elements of the Project which cannot be addressed except through discussion of some Program issues. An example is the Total System Life Cycle Cost addressed in Section 7 of this report. Where Program issues are discussed in this Report, the reader is reminded of the scope limitations of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) contract to review only the Yucca Mountain Project. The primary scope of the Review was to respond to the specific criteria contained in the NARUC scope of work. In responding to these criteria, the Review Team understood that some interested parties have expressed concern over the requirements of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act relative to the Yucca Mountain Project and the nature of activities currently being carried out by the Department of Energy at the Yucca Mountain Project site. The Review Team has attempted to analyze relevant portions of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act as Amended, but has not conducted a thorough analysis of this legislation that could lead to any specific legal conclusions about all aspects of it.

NONE

1995-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

245

RD&I meeting Review DOE Projects  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1-23, 2012 1-23, 2012 2 © SIGMA 3 Integrated Reservoir Solutions, Inc. All Rights Reserved. OUTLINE * Benefits to the program * Project Overview - Goals and Objectives - Purpose/POC - Stratagem * Technical Status - Reservoir Definition/model - Reservoir simulator - Challenges * Summary - Key Findings/Conclusion - Future Plans * Accomplishments * Appendix © SIGMA 3 Integrated Reservoir Solutions, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 3 © SIGMA 3 Integrated Reservoir Solutions, Inc. All Rights Reserved. BENEFITS TO THE PROGRAM * Simulation and Risk Assessment :Technologies that will support industries ability to predict CO 2 storage capacity in geologic formation to within ± 30% By: * Demonstrating field scale feasibility of using ED/RSM techniques to optimize engineering

246

Federal Stewardship | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Federal Stewardship Federal Stewardship Ames Site Office (AMSO) AMSO Home About Organization Chart .pdf file (113KB) Federal Stewardship Internal Site Office Operations Jobs Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Ames Site Office U.S. Department of Energy 9800 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 P: (630) 252-6167 F: (630) 252-2855 About Federal Stewardship Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Federal Stewardship maintains and protects Federal assets at the Ames Laboratory or assigned to the Ames Site Office. Objectives Reviews and assesses Ames Laboratory and support activities and stewardship needs against the contract requirements and takes action, as necessary. Develops and maintains an effective working relationship and communication

247

Energy Savings Performance Contract Project Facilitators | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Savings Performance Contract Project Facilitators Energy Savings Performance Contract Project Facilitators Energy Savings Performance Contract Project Facilitators October 7, 2013 - 1:39pm Addthis Project facilitators help Federal agencies avoid obstacles and expedite projects, guiding the acquisition team through the process of developing, awarding, and verifying savings from energy savings performance contract (ESPC) projects. Project facilitators are experienced, unbiased advisors who: Provide consultation about contract and funding issues, technology and engineering considerations, and measurement and verification processes Review cost and technical proposals Draft the agency's task order request for proposal Provide other services as requested. Federal agencies developing U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) ESPC projects

248

M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Federal Energy...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Federal Energy Projects M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Federal Energy Projects FEMP's standard procedures and...

249

NREL: Technology Deployment - Other Federal Agency Support  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Other Federal Agency Support Other Federal Agency Support Photo of a man and a woman standing behind a ground-mounted solar panel installation. Merry Edwards Winery in California is almost 100% solar powered and just one example of the more than 77,511 project applications reviewed by NREL prior to receiving funding through the U.S. Department of Treasury Recovery Act Section 1603 Treasury Grant Program. Courtesy of Ben Miller, Merry Edwards Winery Through work-for-others agreements, NREL supports other federal agencies in finding ways to meet energy savings goals through energy assessments, analysis, project guidance, and other activities. General Services Administration Since 2007, NREL has worked with the General Services Administration (GSA) to conduct energy assessments and identify opportunities for distributed

250

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09 09 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 93 / Friday, May 14, 1999 / Notices technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 3.03 hours per response. It is estimated that any individual may respond to synopses or market research questions 5 times per year. EPA anticipates publicizing approximately 260 contract actions per year, and conducting 3790 market research inquiries. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review

251

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

32 32 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 15, 1999 / Notices that the original selection list would remain in effect. The complainant requested review of the SLA's stipulated decision by a Federal arbitration panel. The panel was convened on April 17, 1998. Arbitration Panel Decision The issue before the arbitration panel was whether the SLA's stipulated decision to make a determination concerning the continuation of the special assignment process at the time a military base became available was inconsistent with the ALJ's determination. The arbitration panel ruled that, at the time a military base contract became available, there may be a compelling reason that would benefit both the program and the complainant that would justify not assigning complainant

252

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

66 66 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 142 / Friday, July 24, 1998 / Notices Dated: July 16, 1998. Richard D. Wilson, Acting Assistant Administrator. [FR Doc. 98-19832 Filed 7-23-98; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ER-FRL-5494-1] Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments Availability of EPA comments prepared July 6, 1998 Through July 10, 1998 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities AT (202) 564-5076. An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published

253

Review of trend analysis and climate change projections of extreme precipitation and floods in Europe  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Summary This paper presents a review of trend analysis of extreme precipitation and hydrological floods in Europe based on observations and future climate projections. The review summaries methods and methodologies applied and key findings from a large number of studies. Reported analyses of observed extreme precipitation and flood records show that there is some evidence of a general increase in extreme precipitation, whereas there are no clear indications of significant trends at large-scale regional or national level of extreme streamflow. Several studies from regions dominated by snowmelt-induced peak flows report decreases in extreme streamflow and earlier spring snowmelt peak flows, likely caused by increasing temperature. The review of likely future changes based on climate projections indicates a general increase in extreme precipitation under a future climate, which is consistent with the observed trends. Hydrological projections of peak flows show large impacts in many areas with both positive and negative changes. A general decrease in flood magnitude and earlier spring floods are projected for catchments with snowmelt-dominated peak flows, which is consistent with the observed trends. Finally, existing guidelines in Europe on design flood and design rainfall estimation are reviewed. The review shows that only few countries have developed guidelines that incorporate a consideration of climate change impacts.

H. Madsen; D. Lawrence; M. Lang; M. Martinkova; T.R. Kjeldsen

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

254

Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority Project Abstracts; May 25-27, Portland, Oregon, 1997 Annual Review.  

SciTech Connect

Abstracts are presented from the 1997 Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Review of Projects. The purpose was to provide information and education on the approximate 127 million dollars in Northwest electric ratepayer fish and wildlife mitigation projects funded annually.

Allee, Brian J. (Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority, Portland, OR)

1997-06-26T23:59:59.000Z

255

Project management: A Handbook of fundamentals for the packaging student and professional with a review of current literature.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

??This thesis seeks to introduce the basic concepts and techniques of project management to packaging students and professionals. After reviewing these fundamentals, packaging students and (more)

Fischer, Kenneth

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

256

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: SuperTruck Program: Engine Project Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by Detroit Diesel Corporation at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about SuperTruck Program...

257

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) FEMP Technical Assistance Federal Aviation Administration Project 209 Control Tower and Support Building, Reno, Nevada  

SciTech Connect

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) and Redhorse Corporation (Redhorse) conducted an energy audit on the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) control tower and base building in Reno, Nevada. This report presents the findings of the energy audit team that evaluated construction documents and operating specifications (at the 100% level) and completed a site visit. The focus of the review was to identify measures that could be incorporated into the final design and operating specifications that would result in additional energy savings for the FAA that would not have otherwise occurred.

Arends, J.; Sandusky, William F.

2010-06-30T23:59:59.000Z

258

Hanford Sludge Treatment Project 105-KW Final Safety Analysis Report Review, August 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site Visit Report Site Visit Report Sludge Treatment Project 105-KW Final Safety Analysis Report Review May 2011 August 2011 Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 4.0 Results .................................................................................................................................................... 2

259

Microsoft PowerPoint - 16.1045_Peer Reviews Panel_Lehman Workshop Briefing w-headings  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Science Science Peer Reviews 101 Daniel R. Lehman, Director Office of Project Assessment Office of Project Assessment Office of Science Peer Review 101 Panel Members Mr. Daniel Lehman, Director, Office of Project Assessment Office of Science Mr. Hanley Lee, Deputy Manager, SLAC Site Office (formerly SC Federal Project Director for the LCLS Project) Mr. James Krupnick, Associate Lab. Director/Chief Operating Officer Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (formerly Project Director for the Molecular Foundry Project) Mr. Scott Samuelson, PMP Acting Director, NNSA Office of Major Systems Acquisitions (formerly NNSA Federal Project Director for the NIF Project) Office of Science Peer Reviews 101 (formerly NNSA Federal Project Director for the NIF Project) 2 Office of Science Peer Reviews 101

260

Hanford Sludge Treatment Project 105-KW Final Safety Analysis Report Review, August 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Site Visit Report Site Visit Report Sludge Treatment Project 105-KW Final Safety Analysis Report Review May 2011 August 2011 Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 4.0 Results .................................................................................................................................................... 2

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Phase 5 storage (Project W-112) Central Waste Complex operational readiness review, final report  

SciTech Connect

This document is the final report for the RFSH conducted, Contractor Operational Readiness Review (ORR) for the Central Waste Complex (CWC) Project W-112 and Interim Safety Basis implementation. As appendices, all findings, observations, lines of inquiry and the implementation plan are included.

Wight, R.H.

1997-05-30T23:59:59.000Z

262

A review of recent advances in ab initio protein folding by the Folding@home project  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

A review of recent advances in ab initio protein folding by the Folding@home project William Ito molecular simulations of protein folding. Thanks to engineering innovations like a Graphical Processing Unit power, allowing it to simulate longer and more complex protein folding mechanisms than ever before

263

Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practicee on Federal Landscaped Grounds  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

W W A S H I N G T O N April 26, 1994 MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES SUBJECT: Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practicee on Federal Landscaped Grounds The Report of the National Performance Review contains recommendations for a series of environmental actions, including one to increase environmentally and economically beneficial landscaping practices at Federal facilities and federally funded project.. Environmentally beneficial landscaping entail. utilizing techniques that complement and enhance the local environment and seek to minimize the adverse effects that the landscaping will have on it. In particular, this means using regionally native plants and employing landscaping practices and technologies that conserve water

264

Federal Energy Management Program: News  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PROJECT FUNDING PROJECT FUNDING TECHNOLOGIES SERVICES NEWS & EVENTS EERE » Federal Energy Management Program » News & Events Site Map Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Federal Energy Management Program: News to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: News on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: News on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: News on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: News on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: News on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: News on AddThis.com... News Events News Subscribe to RSS News Feed RSS Feed icon January 13, 2014 FEMP Offers New Advanced eTraining on UESCs The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Federal Energy Management Program

265

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09 09 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 1997 / Notices Information Officer, publishes this notice containing proposed information collection requests at the beginning of the Departmental review of the information collection. Each proposed information collection, grouped by office, contains the following: (1) Type of review requested, e.g., new, revision, extension, existing or reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of the collection; (4) Description of the need for, and proposed use of, the information; (5) Respondents and frequency of collection; and (6) Reporting and/or Recordkeeping burden. ED invites public comment at the address specified above. Copies of the requests are available from Patrick J. Sherrill at the address specified above. The Department of Education is

266

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

247 247 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 138 / Wednesday, July 17, 1996 / Notices by the Secretary of Commerce. The purpose of this meeting is to review the 1996 Award applications and to select applications to be considered in the site visit stage of the evaluation. The applications under review contain trade secrets and proprietary commercial information submitted to the Government in confidence. DATES: The meeting will convene August 7, 1996, at 8:00 a.m. and adjourn at 5:00 p.m. on August 7, 1996. The entire meeting will be closed. ADDRESS: The meeting will be held at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Administration Building, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Harry Hertz, Director for Quality Programs, National Institute of

267

Federal Wind Energy Assistance through NREL (Fact Sheet)  

SciTech Connect

NREL assists with wind resource assessment and development activities initiated by federal agencies to facilitate distributed renewable energy projects at federal agency sites. This brief outlines the process for requesting NREL assistance with federal wind energy projects.

Not Available

2009-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

268

Inventory of Federal energy-related environment and safety research for FY 1979. Volume II. Project listings and indexes  

SciTech Connect

This volume contains summaries of FY 1979 government-sponsored environment and safety research related to energy arranged by log number, which groups the projects by reporting agency. The log number is a unique number assigned to each project from a block of numbers set aside for each contributing agency. Information elements included in the summary listings are project title, principal investigators, research organization, project number, contract number, supporting organization, funding level, related energy sources with numbers indicating percentages of effort devoted to each, and R and D categories. A brief description of each project is given, and this is followed by subject index terms that were assigned for computer searching and for generating the printed subject index in the back of this volume.

None

1980-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

269

Department of Energy review of the National Spallation Neutron Source Project  

SciTech Connect

A Department of Energy (DOE) review of the Conceptual Design Report (CDR) for the National Spallation Neutron Source (NSNS) was conducted. The NSNS will be a new high-power spallation neutron source; initially, it will operate at 1 megawatt (MW), but is designed to be upgradeable to significantly higher power, at lower cost, when accelerator and target technologies are developed for higher power. The 53-member Review Committee examined the projected cost, schedule, technical scope, and management structure described in the CDR. For each of the major components of the NSNS, the Committee determined that the project team had produced credible designs that can be expected to work well. What remains to be done is to integrate the design of these components. With the exception of the liquid mercury target, the NSNS Project will rely heavily on proven technologies and, thus, will face a relatively low risk to successful project completion. The Total Project Cost (TPC) presented to the Committee in the CDR was $1.266 billion in as-spent dollars. In general, the Committee felt that the laboratory consortium had presented a credible estimate for each of the major components but that value engineering might produce some savings. The construction schedule presented to the Committee covered six years beginning in FY 1999. The Committee questioned whether all parts of the project could be completed according to this schedule. In particular, the linac and the conventional facilities appeared to have overly optimistic schedules. The NSNS project team was encouraged to reexamine these activities and to consider a more conservative seven-year schedule. Another concern of the Committee was the management structure. In summary, the Committee felt that this Conceptual Design Report was a very credible proposal, and that there is a high probability for successful completion of this major project within the proposed budget, although the six-year proposed schedule may be optimistic.

NONE

1997-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

270

The Federal Endangered Species Act: Is Judicial Review Available to Safeguard against Agency Decisions Not To Enforce?  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Review Available to Safeguard Against Agency Decisions NotUnlike persons who can safeguard their own rights throughupon judicial review as a safeguard against irrational and

Pham, Brandon L.

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

271

Design review report: 200 East upgrades for Project W-314, tank farm restoration and safe operations  

SciTech Connect

This Design Review Report (DRR) documents the contractor design verification methodology and records associated with project W-314`s 200 East (200E) Upgrades design package. The DRR includes the documented comments and their respective dispositions for this design. Acceptance of the comment dispositions and closure of the review comments is indicated by the signatures of the participating reviewers. Project W-314 is a project within the Tank Waste Remediation System (TWRS) Tank Waste Retrieval Program. This project provides capital upgrades for the existing Hanford tank farm waste transfer, instrumentation, ventilation, and electrical infrastructure systems. To support established TWRS programmatic objectives, the project is organized into two distinct phases. The initial focus of the project (i.e., Phase 1) is on waste transfer system upgrades needed to support the TWRS Privatization waste feed delivery system. Phase 2 of the project will provide upgrades to support resolution of regulatory compliance issues, improve tank infrastructure reliability, and reduce overall plant operating/maintenance costs. Within Phase 1 of the W-314 project, the waste transfer system upgrades are further broken down into six major packages which align with the project`s work breakdown structure. Each of these six sub-elements includes the design, procurement, and construction activities necessary to accomplish the specific tank farm upgrades contained within the package. The first design package (AN Valve Pit Upgrades) was completed in November 1997, and the associated design verification activities are documented in HNF-1893. The second design package, 200 East (200E) Upgrades, was completed in March 1998. This design package identifies modifications to existing valve pits 241-AX-B and 241-A-B, as well as several new waste transfer pipelines to be constructed within the A Farm Complex of the 200E Area. The scope of the valve pit modifications includes new pit cover blocks, valve manifolds, leak detectors, and special protective coatings similar to those previously approved for the AN Valve Pit Upgrades design package. The new transfer lines included in this package (with official line number designations) are described within.

Boes, K.A.

1998-04-15T23:59:59.000Z

272

Federal Funding for State and Local Clean Energy Programs  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Federal programs that provide funding to state and local governments for clean energy programs and projects.

273

FEMP Best Practices and Lessons Learned for Federal Agency ESPC...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FEMP Best Practices and Lessons Learned for Federal Agency ESPC Projects Contents 1. Introduction ......

274

DOE Releases Federal Building Metering Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The guidance requires federal agencies to review, revise, and submit to FEMP its metering implementation plan within one year.

275

Revealing the Hidden Value that the Federal Investment Tax Credit and Treasury Cash Grant Provide To Community Wind Projects  

SciTech Connect

Although the global financial crisis of 2008/2009 has slowed wind power development in general, the crisis has, in several respects, been a blessing in disguise for community wind project development in the United States. For xample, the crisis-induced slowdown in the broader commercial wind market has, for the first time since 2004, created slack in the supply chain, creating an opportunity for shovel-ready community wind projects to finally proceed towards onstruction. Many such projects had been forced to wait on the sidelines as the commercial wind boom of 2005-2008 consumed virtually all available resources needed to complete a wind project (e.g., turbines, cranes, contractors).

Bolinger, Mark A.

2009-12-14T23:59:59.000Z

276

Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Annual Energy Outlook Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections March 2012 Independent Statistics & Analysis www.eia.gov U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 U.S. Energy Information Administration | AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections i This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA's data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the Department of Energy or

277

Federal Energy Management Program: Services  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Services to Services to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Services on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Services on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Services on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Services on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Services on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Services on AddThis.com... Project Assistance Training Outreach Services The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) offers specialized services through: Technical and Project Assistance: Find resources for technical assistance and information about FEMP calls for projects. Training: Look up FEMP-produced live and on-demand courses, workshops, and webinars. Outreach: Get information about awards and campaigns that motivate energy-

278

Recovery Act Project Stories  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, these Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) projects exemplify the range of technical assistance provided to federal agencies.

279

Operational Awareness Review of the Hanford Sludge Treatment Project, April 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

HIAR-RL-2011-04-07 HIAR-RL-2011-04-07 Site: DOE-Richland Operations Office Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Sludge Treatment Project Dates of Activity : 11/17/2010 - 04/07/2011 Report Preparer: Jake Wechselberger Activity Description/Purpose: The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed operational awareness reviews of the Sludge Treatment Project (STP), Engineered Container Retrieval and Transfer System (ECRTS) during site visits. Result: On November 17, 2010, a HSS representative participated in a tour of the STP test facility. The HSS representative was also briefed by the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) Project Engineer, the CHPRC STP Design

280

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 51 / Tuesday, March 16, 2004 / Notices meeting and will be provided opportunities to speak following previously scheduled speakers. Speakers will be requested to limit their initial comments to about five minutes. Speakers who need more than five minutes should indicate the length of time desired in their request. Depending on the number of speakers, DOE may need to limit speakers to five minutes initially but will provide additional opportunities as time permits. Speakers may also provide written materials to supplement their presentations. Oral and written comments will be given equal consideration. DOE will begin the meeting with an overview of the proposed Low-Emission Boiler System Project. The meeting will not be conducted as an evidentiary

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

139 139 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 23, 2004 / Notices EIS until March 31, 2004. Once scoping ended, BPA revised the Scoping Summary to reflect all comments received, and republished the summary on April 7, 2004. Based on the results of the public scoping conducted for the Transmission Policy-Level EIS and internal considerations such as the current and most recently projected activities of BPA's Transmission Business Line and budget issues, BPA has decided that continued consideration of a comprehensive policy for BPA's transmission business is not in the best interests of the agency at this time. As a result, it is no longer necessary to proceed with preparation of the Transmission Policy-Level EIS. Therefore, BPA is issuing this notice of

282

Draft Advanced Nuclear Energy Projects Solicitation | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Projects Solicitation Draft Advanced Nuclear Energy Projects Solicitation Federal loan guarantee solicitation announcement -- Advanced Nuclear Energy Projects. Draft Advanced...

283

Federal Register Notice for Draft Addendum to Environmental Review Documents Concerning Exports of Natural Gas from the United States  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Office of Fossil Energy of the Department of Energy announces the availability for public review and comment of the Draft Addendum To Environmental Review Documents Concerning Exports Of...

284

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

146 146 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 122 / Friday, June 23, 2000 / Notices instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. EPA estimates that the changes discussed today, when implemented, will reduce burden by 23,000 hours and an insignificant number of dollars. Dated: June 14, 2000. Elizabeth Cotsworth, Director, Office of Solid Waste.

285

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

87 87 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 173 / Thursday, September 5, 1996 / Notices of burden accurate, (4) how might the Department enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected, and (5) how might the Department minimize the burden of this collection on the respondents, including through the use of information technology. Dated: August 29, 1996. Gloria Parker, Director, Information Resources Group. Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Type of Review: New. Title: Guidance on the Goals 2000 Amendments (Draft). Frequency: One-time submission. Affected Public: State, local or Tribal Gov't, SEAs or LEAs. Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour Burden: Responses: 30 Burden Hours: 3,000 Abstract: The Omnibus Consolidated Rescissions and Appropriations Act of

286

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

30 30 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 214 / Friday, November 5, 1999 / Notices natural or human environment. Because no significant environmental impacts will result from implementation of the proposed action, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required and will not be prepared. The Army will not initiate the proposed action for 15 days following the completion of the EA and FNSI and publication of a public notice in a local newspaper. This EA is available for review at the following repositories: Lassen Community College Library, Highway 139, P.O. Box 3000, Susanville, CA 96130; Lassen County Public Works, 707 Nevada Street, Suite 2, Susanville, CA 96130; and the Washoe County Library, Downtown Branch, 301 South Center Street, Reno NV 89501. Dated: November 1, 1999.

287

Evaluation of Dredged Material Proposed for Ocean Disposal from Federal Projects in New York and New Jersey and the Military Ocean Terminal (MOTBY)  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is authorized by Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (MPRSA), Public Law 92-532, and by the Clean Water Act of 1972 (CWA) and Amendments of 1977 to permit, evaluate, and regulate the disposal of dredged material in ocean waters to minimize adverse environmental effects. Compliance with the regulations of the MPRSA calls for physical and biological testing of sediment proposed for dredging prior to its disposal in ocean waters. The testing required by the MPRSA criteria is conducted under a testing manual developed by the USACE and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Evaluation of Dredged Material Proposed for Ocean Disposal (Testing Manual), commonly referred to as the `Green Book.` Testing protocols in the Green Book include bulk sediment analysis, grain size analysis, elutriate testing, and biological testing. The biological testing includes bioassays for acute toxicity as well as analysis to determine bioaccumulation of certain contaminants by marine organisms. The objective of the USACE-NYD Federal Projects Program was to evaluate sediment proposed for dredging and unconfined ocean disposal at the Mud Dump Site. The results of analytical measurements and bioassays performed on the test sediments were compared with analyses of sediment from the Mud Dump Reference Site to determine whether the test sediments were acutely toxic to marine organisms or resulted in statistically significantly greater bioaccumulation of contaminants in marine organisms, relative to the reference sediment. Testing for the federal project areas was performed according to the requirements.

Barrows, E.S.; Antrim, L.D.; Pinza, M.R.; Gardiner, W.W.; Kohn, N.P.; Gruendell, B.D.; Mayhew, H.L.; Word, J.Q.; Rosman, L.B. [Battelle Marine Sciences Laboratory, Sequim, Washington (United States)

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

288

EIA-Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review-Evaluation of Projections in  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

9) 9) The Energy Information Administration (EIA) produces projections of energy supply and demand each year in the Annual Energy Outlook (AEO). The projections in the AEO are not statements of what will happen but of what might happen, given the assumptions and methodologies. The Reference case projection assumes trends that are consistent with historical and current market behavior, technological and demographic changes, and current laws and regulations. The potential impacts of pending or proposed legislation, regulations, and standards-or of sections of legislation that have been enacted but that require implementing regulations or appropriation of funds that are not provided or specified in the legislation itself-are not reflected in the projections. Thus, the AEO Reference case provides an impartial baseline that can be used to analyze potential new policies or legislative initiatives. The analysis in the AEO primarily focuses on a Reference case, lower and higher economic growth cases, and lower and higher oil price cases. However, approximately 30 alternative cases are generally included in the AEO. Readers are encouraged to review the full range of cases, which address many of the uncertainties inherent in long-term projections.

289

Geothermal direct-heat utilization assistance: Federal assistance program. Quarterly project progress report, October--December 1995  

SciTech Connect

The report summarizes geothermal technical assistance, R&D and technology transfer activities of the Geo-Heat Center at Oregon Institute of Technology for the first quarter of FY-96. It describes 90 contacts with parties during this period related to technical assistance with geothermal direct heat projects. Areas dealt with include geothermal heat pumps, space heating, greenhouses, aquaculture, equipment and resources. Research activities are summarized on low-temperature resource assessment, geothermal district heating system cost evaluation and silica waste utilization project. Outreach activities include the publication of a geothermal direct use Bulletin, dissemination of information, geothermal library, technical papers and seminars, development of a webpage, and progress monitor reports on geothermal resources and utilization.

NONE

1996-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

290

Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Contacts  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Contacts to someone by E-mail Contacts to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Contacts on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Contacts on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Contacts on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Contacts on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Contacts on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Contacts on AddThis.com... Energy-Efficient Products Technology Deployment Renewable Energy Federal Requirements Renewable Resources & Technologies Project Planning & Implementation Project Assistance Resource Maps & Screening Tools Purchasing Renewable Power

291

Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Renewable Energy Renewable Energy to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy on AddThis.com... Energy-Efficient Products Technology Deployment Renewable Energy Federal Requirements Renewable Resources & Technologies Project Planning & Implementation Project Assistance Resource Maps & Screening Tools Purchasing Renewable Power Case Studies Training Working Group Contacts

292

Geothermal direct-heat utilization assistance. Federal Assistance Program, Quarterly project progress report, October--December 1994  

SciTech Connect

The report summarizes activities of the Geo-Heat Center (GHC) at Oregon Institute of Technology for the first quarter of Fiscal Year 1995. It describes contacts with parties during this period related to assistance with geothermal direct heat projects. Areas dealt with include geothermal heat pumps, space heating, greenhouses, aquaculture, resources and equipment. Research is also being conducted on geothermal energy cost evaluation, low-temperature geothermal resource assessment, use of silica waste from the Cerro Prieto geothermal field as construction materials and geothermal heat pumps. Outreach activities include the publication of a quarterly Bulletin on direct heat applications and dissemination of information on low-temperature geothermal resources and utilization.

Not Available

1994-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

293

Geothermal direct-heat utilization assistance. Quarterly project progress report, July 1996--September 1996. Federal Assistance Program  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes geothermal technical assistance, R&D and technology transfer activities of the Geo-Heat Center at Oregon Institute of Technology for the fourth quarter of FY-96. It describes 152 contacts with parties during this period related to technical assistance with geothermal direct heat projects. Areas dealt with include geothermal heat pumps, space heating, greenhouses, aquaculture, equipment, economics and resources. Research activities are summarized on greenhouse peaking. Outreach activities include the publication of a geothermal direct use Bulletin, dissemination of information, geothermal library, technical papers and seminars, and progress monitor reports on geothermal resources and utilization.

Lienau, P.

1996-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

294

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Seminar: DOE/FEMP...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FederalUtility Strategic Partnership Meetings For utilities with comprehensive DSM service offerings and large Federal customer base. 9 UESC Project Support FEMP can...

295

Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Savings Performance Contract  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Energy Savings Energy Savings Performance Contract Project Facilitators to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Savings Performance Contract Project Facilitators on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Savings Performance Contract Project Facilitators on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Savings Performance Contract Project Facilitators on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Savings Performance Contract Project Facilitators on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Savings Performance Contract Project Facilitators on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Savings Performance Contract Project Facilitators on AddThis.com...

296

Geothermal direct-heat utilization assistance. Federal Assistance Program quarterly project progress report, April 1--June 30, 1998  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes geothermal technical assistance, R and D and technology transfer activities of the Geo-Heat Center at Oregon Institute of Technology for the third quarter of FY98 (April--June, 1998). It describes 231 contacts with parties during this period related to technical assistance with geothermal direct heat projects. Areas dealt with included requests for general information including material for high school and university students, and material on geothermal heat pumps, resource and well data, spacing heating and cooling, greenhouses, aquaculture, equipment, district heating, resorts and spas, industrial applications, snow melting and electric power. Research activities include work on model construction specifications for line shaft submersible pumps and plate heat exchangers, and a comprehensive aquaculture developers package. A brochure on Geothermal Energy in Klamath County was developed for state and local tourism use. Outreach activities include the publication of the Quarterly Bulletin (Vol. 19, No. 2) with articles on research at the Geo-Heat Center, sustainability of geothermal resources, injection well drilling in Boise, ID and a greenhouse project in the Azores. Other outreach activities include dissemination of information mainly through mailings of publications, tours of local geothermal uses, geothermal library acquisitions and use, participation in workshops, short courses and technical meetings by the staff, and progress monitor reports on geothermal activities.

NONE

1998-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

297

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Painesville Municipal Electric Power Vanadium Redox Battery Demo Project - Jodi Startari, Ashlawn Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Electric Power Electric Power Vanadium Redox Battery Demonstration Project Jodi Startari Ashlawn Energy LLC Briefing Overview * Painesville Municipal Electric Power Plant Project Synopsis * Vanadium Redox Flow Battery Technology * City of Painesville Municipal Electric Plant History * Project Multiple Objectives and Additional Detail * Project Risk Analysis presented at previous Peer Review * Project to date progress * Cost Distribution * Summary/Conclusions * Future Tasks * Questions US Produced Vanadium Redox Flow Battery for Bulk Storage, Peak Shaving * 8 MW Hour redox flow battery (1MW 8 hours) * To be installed at Painesville Municipal Electric Plant (PMEP), a 32 MW coal fired facility * Most efficient PMEP operation is steady state at 26 MW (lowest emissions, lowest operating cost)

298

NETL Publications: Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 Conference Proceedings 3 Conference Proceedings Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting August 20-22, 2013 Table of Contents Disclaimer Presentations PRESENTATIONS Tuesday, August 20, 2013 Welcome and Introduction Traci Rodosta, Carbon Storage Technology Manager, U.S. DOE NETL PLENARY SESSION - KEYNOTE PRESENTATIONS Moderator: Bruce Brown, Infrastructure Coordinator, U.S. DOE NETL Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships Overview Bruce Brown, Infrastructure Coordinator, U.S. DOE NETL A Decade of CCS Development: A Global Review John Gale, General Manager, IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme Onshore Monitoring, Verification, Accounting, and Assessment Lessons Learned Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships Panel Lee Spangler, BSCSP; Neeraj Gupta, MRCSP; Charlie Gorecki, PCOR; George Koperna, SECARB

299

Federal Register Notice for Addendum to Environmental Review Documents Concerning Exports of Natural Gas from the United States  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Office of Fossil Energy (FE) of the Department of Energy (DOE) announces the availability of the Addendum To Environmental Review Documents Concerning Exports Of Natural Gas From The United...

300

Shadow Review of the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Transuranic Storage Area Retrieval Enclosue Restrieval Restart DOE Readiness Assessment  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ID-2011-09-22 ID-2011-09-22 Site: Idaho Site - Idaho Cleanup Project Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Shadow Review of the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) Transuranic Storage Area-Retrieval Enclosure (TSA-RE) Retrieval Restart Department of Energy Readiness Assessment Dates of Activity : 09/20/2011 - 09/22/2011 Report Preparer: Aleem Boatright Activity Description/Purpose: A review of nuclear safety implementation verification review (IVR) procedures and processes was conducted at the Idaho Site from September 12-22, 2011. The scope originally included shadowing of the Department of Energy (DOE) Idaho Operations Office (DOE-ID) Idaho Cleanup Project IVR for the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project (SBWTP).

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Shadow Review of the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Transuranic Storage Area Retrieval Enclosue Restrieval Restart DOE Readiness Assessment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ID-2011-09-22 ID-2011-09-22 Site: Idaho Site - Idaho Cleanup Project Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Shadow Review of the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) Transuranic Storage Area-Retrieval Enclosure (TSA-RE) Retrieval Restart Department of Energy Readiness Assessment Dates of Activity : 09/20/2011 - 09/22/2011 Report Preparer: Aleem Boatright Activity Description/Purpose: A review of nuclear safety implementation verification review (IVR) procedures and processes was conducted at the Idaho Site from September 12-22, 2011. The scope originally included shadowing of the Department of Energy (DOE) Idaho Operations Office (DOE-ID) Idaho Cleanup Project IVR for the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project (SBWTP).

302

Environmental Management Construction Project Review of the Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility, July 19-22, 210  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Activity Report for the Shadowing of the Environmental Management Construction Project Review of the Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility on July 19-22, 2010 A Department of Energy Construction Project Review (CPR) of the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) project was conducted on July 19-22, 2010, at the request of the Principal Deputy Secretary, Office of Environmental Management (EM-2). The purpose of the review was to assess the cost, schedule, and technical progress against the approved Performance Baseline. Specific review areas were Engineering; Commissioning; Environment, Safety, Health, and Quality Assurance; Cost, Schedule, and Risk; and Management and Acquisition.

303

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reedsport OPT Wave Park, LLC Project No. 12713-002 Reedsport OPT Wave Park, LLC Project No. 12713-002 Oregon NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (December 3, 2010) In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission or FERC's) regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed Reedsport OPT Wave Park, LLC's application for license for the Reedsport OPT Wave Park Project (FERC Project No. 12713-002), which would be located in Oregon State territorial waters about 2.5 nautical miles off the coast near Reedsport, in Douglas County, Oregon. Staff prepared an environmental assessment (EA), which analyzes the potential environmental effects of licensing the project and concludes that licensing the project,

304

Hawaii Energy Strategy Project 2: Fossil Energy Review. Task IV. Scenario development and analysis  

SciTech Connect

The Hawaii Energy Strategy (HES) Program is a seven-project effort led by the State of Hawaii Department of Business, Economic Development & Tourism (DBEDT) to investigate a wide spectrum of Hawaii energy issues. The East-West Center`s Program on Resources: Energy and Minerals, has been assigned HES Project 2, Fossil Energy Review, which focuses on fossil energy use in Hawaii and the greater regional and global markets. HES Project 2 has four parts: Task I (World and Regional Fossil Energy Dynamics) covers petroleum, natural gas, and coal in global and regional contexts, along with a discussion of energy and the environment. Task II (Fossil Energy in Hawaii) focuses more closely on fossil energy use in Hawaii: current utilization and trends, the structure of imports, possible future sources of supply, fuel substitutability, and energy security. Task III`s emphasis is Greenfield Options; that is, fossil energy sources not yet used in Hawaii. This task is divided into two sections: first, an in-depth {open_quotes}Assessment of Coal Technology Options and Implications for the State of Hawaii,{close_quotes} along with a spreadsheet analysis model, which was subcontracted to the Environmental Assessment and Information Sciences Division of Argonne National Laboratory; and second, a chapter on liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the Asia-Pacific market and the issues surrounding possible introduction of LNG into the Hawaii market.

Yamaguchi, N.D.; Breazeale, K. [ed.

1993-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

305

Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Project Cask and MCO Helium Purge System Design Review Completion Report Project A.5 and A.6  

SciTech Connect

This report documents the results of the design verification performed on the Cask and Multiple Canister Over-pack (MCO) Helium Purge System. The helium purge system is part of the Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Project Cask Loadout System (CLS) at 100K area. The design verification employed the ''Independent Review Method'' in accordance with Administrative Procedure (AP) EN-6-027-01.

ARD, K.E.

2000-04-19T23:59:59.000Z

306

Comments on the Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on the Request for Information on Improving Performance of on the Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects Comments on the Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Request for Information seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal authorizations. On September 25, the public comment period was extended to October 31, 2013. Comments received are available below. Comments from Lee Cunningham, sent September 23, 2013 Comments from Patrick Ledger of Arizona's G&T Cooperatives, sent September 25, 2013

307

898 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2009 / Notices the time needed to review instructions;  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Transmission Line Project, Proposed Land Use Plan Amendment, Construction and Operation of a New 91-mile 500 kilovolt (kV) Electric Transmission Line from Imperial Valley Substation (in Imperial Co. near the City the continued use of routes in areas containing Naturally Occurring Asbestos and impacts to water quality

308

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution -  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on AddThis.com... Energy-Efficient Products Technology Deployment

309

Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Sustainable Sustainable Federal Fleets to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Operations & Maintenance Greenhouse Gases Water Efficiency Data Center Energy Efficiency Industrial Facilities Sustainable Federal Fleets Laboratories for the 21st Century Institutional Change

310

CRAD, Management- Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a November 2003 assessment of the Management Program portion of an Operational Readiness Review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project.

311

WINDExchange: Funding School Wind Projects  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

polluters. Federal Funds In addition to funding provided by the U.S. Department of Energy, many Wind for Schools projects have received federal grants. The United States...

312

ESS 2012 Peer Review - State & Federal Energy Storage Technology Advancement Partnership - Todd Olinsky-Paul, CESA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Todd Olinsky-Paul Clean Energy States Alliance The Renaissance Hotel Washington, D.C. September 2012 Thank You: Dr. Imre Gyuk U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Dan Borneo Sandia National Laboratories ESTAP is a project of CESA Clean Energy States Alliance (CESA) is a non-profit organization providing a forum for states to work together to implement effective clean energy policies & programs: - Information Exchange - Partnership Development - Joint Projects (National RPS Collaborative, Interstate Turbine Advisory Council) - Clean Energy Program Design & Evaluations - Analysis and Reports CESA is supported by a coalition of states and public utilities representing the leading U.S. public clean energy programs.

313

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: LIPA Smart Energy Corridor Project - Ming Mui, LIPA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Program Peer Review Meeting DE-OE0000220 LIPA Long Island Smart Energy Corridor Ming Mui and Sunil Katwala June 8, 2012 December 2008 LIPA Long Island Smart Energy Corridor Objective Life-cycle Funding ($K) Fiscal Years 2010 to 2015 DOE Funding $ 12,496K Total Project Cost $ 25,293K* Technical Scope (Insert graphic here) * Additional funding from LIPA and SUNY Research Foundation Smart Energy Corridor will: (1) Validate Smart Grid technologies; (2) Quantify Smart Grid costs and benefits; (3) Validate Smart Grid applications at a scale that can be readily adapted and replicated in individual homes and businesses. * Demonstrate Technolgy (DA, Sub Auto, AMI, DLC) * Marketing (TOU Rates, Webtools, Visualization) * Cyber Security (Vulneribility Testing & Hardening)

314

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Wholesale Electricity Market Design Project - Jim Ellison, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Photos placed in Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Wholesale Electricity Market Design Project September 28, 2012 Jim Ellison, Verne Loose, Ray Byrne, Cesar Silva Monroy, and Ryan Elliott Sandia National Laboratories Leigh Tesfatsion Iowa State University DOE Energy Storage Program Peer Review 2012 Introduction - Motivation for a New Market Design  Need to eliminate market bias of resource classes such as Energy Storage  Need to accommodate new technologies, without the need to change market rules  Move away from resource-centric markets toward service-centric markets

315

Project Management Lessons Learned  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The guide supports DOE O 413.3A, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, and aids the federal project directors and integrated project teams in the execution of projects.

2008-08-05T23:59:59.000Z

316

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Ocean Renewable Power Company Maine, LLC Project No. 12711-005 Ocean Renewable Power Company Maine, LLC Project No. 12711-005 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED COBSCOOK BAY TIDAL ENERGY PROJECT (January 4, 2012) In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission or FERC's) regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed Ocean Renewable Power Company, LLC's application for an 8-year pilot license for the proposed Cobscook Bay Tidal Energy Project (FERC Project No. 12711-005), which would be located in Cobscook Bay in Washington County, Maine, and has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Energy

317

Federal Register  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

151 151 Rules and Regulations Federal Register Vol. 60, No. 203 Friday, October 20, 1995 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed to and codified in the Code of Federal IRegulations, which is published under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1610. The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each week. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Western Area Power Administration 10 CFR Part 905 Energy Planning and Management Program AGENCY: Western Area Power Administration, DOE. A cmoN: Final rule. summARv: The Western Area Power Administration is publishing this final rule to adopt an Energy Planning and

318

FEMP Helps Federal Facilities Develop Large-Scale Renewable Energy...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

FEMP Helps Federal Facilities Develop Large-Scale Renewable Energy Projects FEMP Helps Federal Facilities Develop Large-Scale Renewable Energy Projects August 21, 2013 - 12:00am...

319

Assisting Federal Facilities with Energy Conservation Technologies (AFFECT) Funding Opportunity  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

FEMP provides project assistance through the Assisting Federal Facilities with Energy Conservation Technologies (AFFECT) funding opportunity. AFFECT provides grants for the development of capital projects to increase the energy efficiency and renewable energy investments at Federal agency facilities.

320

Project Funding | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Project Funding Project Funding Project Funding Federal energy projects require funding to generate results. Carefully matching available funding options with specific project needs can make the difference between a stalled, unfunded project and a successful project generating energy and cost savings. The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) supports Federal agencies identify, obtain, and implement project funding for energy projects through: Energy Savings Performance Contracts ESPC ENABLE Process Utility Energy Service Contracts On-Site Renewable Power Purchase Agreements Energy Incentive Programs. Federal agencies can choose the funding options that best fits for their project needs. For an overview of available funding options and strategies, read the FEMP Project Funding Quick Guide.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

For the Federal Columbia River Power System  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

its products and services . BPA markets wholesale electrical power from 31 federal hydro projects in the Columbia River Basin, one nonfederal nuclear plant and several small...

322

Federal Register Notices | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Power Express, Inc.: Record of Decision for Issuing a Presidential Permit for the CHPE Transmission Line Project: Federal Register Notice, Volume 79, No. 190 - Oct. 1, 2014 The...

323

FEMP Renewable Energy Project Assistance Application  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Renewable Energy Project Assistance Application Renewable Energy Project Assistance Application Please complete electronically Request Date: _________________________________________________________________________________________ Federal Agency: _______________________________________________________________________________________ Federal Agency Contact Person Name: ______________________________________________________________________ Phone: ______________________________________________________________________________________________ E-mail: ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Project Name: ________________________________________________________________________________________ Project Location: City _________________________________________ State ___________ Zip Code __________________

324

Comprehensive Summary and Analysis of Oral and Written Scoping Comments on the Hawaii Geothermal Project EIS (DOE Review Draft)  

SciTech Connect

This report contains summaries of the oral and written comments received during the scoping process for the Hawaii Geothermal Project (HGP) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Oral comments were presented during public scoping meetings; written comments were solicited at the public scoping meetings and in the ''Advance Notice of Intent'' and ''Notice of Intent'' (published in the ''Federal Register'') to prepare the HGP EIS. This comprehensive summary of scoping inputs provides an overview of the issues that have been suggested for inclusion in the HGP EIS.

None

1992-09-18T23:59:59.000Z

325

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery. Progress review number 87  

SciTech Connect

Approximately 30 research projects are summarized in this report. Title of the project, contract number, company or university, award amount, principal investigators, objectives, and summary of technical progress are given for each project. Enhanced oil recovery projects include chemical flooding, gas displacement, and thermal recovery. Most of the research projects though are related to geoscience technology and reservoir characterization.

NONE

1997-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

326

Consent Order, Fluor Federal Services - EA-2000-10 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Services - EA-2000-10 Federal Services - EA-2000-10 Consent Order, Fluor Federal Services - EA-2000-10 July 25, 2000 Price-Anderson Enforcement Consent Order issued to Fluor Federal Services related to Quality Problems at the Tank Farm Waste Remediation System at the Hanford Site, (EA-2000-10) This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of two internal investigations conducted by Fluor Hanford, Inc. and CH2M Hanford Group, Inc. in which Fluor Federal Services (FFS) jointly participated. Collectively, the two investigations examined the facts and circumstances surrounding quality problems with the procurement of safety class piping for the W-314 Project at the Tank Farm Waste Remediation System and reviewed the adequacy and effectiveness of FFS's procurement quality

327

"FEMP Support Through Initial Proposal Review for Contractor-Identified Super ESPC Project"  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 " "FEMP Support Through Initial Proposal Review for Contractor-Identified Super ESPC Project" "Task #","Task Title","Work Scope","Deliverable","Agency Requirements" " " "Phase One Activities - Project Planning" "1-1","Energy Potential Assessment","FEMP Services will analyze all available information to determine if Agency specified project site is a good candidate for ESPC. FEMP Services will provide recommendations as needed to improve project economics for Super ESPC/recommend other project implementation strategies","Telecon advice and recommendations","Agency will provide site data requested by FEMP Services staff. Typical data requested is 1-2 years of monthly utility bill, past audits, building list and maintenance records, facility condition assessments."

328

Tri-State Synfuels Project Review: Volume 12. Fluor project status. [Proposed Henderson, Kentucky coal to gasoline plant; engineering  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this report is to document and summarize activities associated with Fluor's efforts on the Tri-State Synfuels Project. The proposed facility was to be coal-to-transport fuels facility located in Henderson, Kentucky. Tri-State Synfuels Company was participating in the project as a partner of the US Department of Energy per terms of a Cooperative Agreement resulting from DOE's synfuel's program solicitation. Fluor's initial work plan called for preliminary engineering and procurement services to the point of commitment for construction for a Sasol Fischer-Tropsch plant. Work proceeded as planned until October 1981 when results of alternative coal-to-methanol studies revealed the economic disadvantage of the Synthol design for US markets. A number of alternative process studies followed to determine the best process configuration. In January 1982 Tri-State officially announced a change from Synthol to a Methanol to Gasoline (MTG) design basis. Further evaluation and cost estimates for the MTG facility eventually led to the conclusion that, given the depressed economic outlook for alternative fuels development, the project should be terminated. Official announcement of cancellation was made on April 13, 1982. At the time of project cancellation, Fluor had completed significant portions of the preliminary engineering effort. Included in this report are descriptions and summaries of Fluor's work during this project. In addition location of key project data and materials is identified and status reports for each operation are presented.

Not Available

1982-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

329

Federal Railroad Administration  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE TRANSPORTATION EXTERNAL WORKING GROUP MEETING Pueblo, CO. September 20, 2005 Presented by Kevin R. Blackwell Radioactive Materials/Hazardous Materials Specialist Federal Railroad Administration - HQ Hazmat Division, Washington, DC. Federal Railroad Administration Dedicated Train Study - Report to Congress November 2003 - FRA' s Ofc. Of Research & Development (RDV), as lead on the Dedicated Train Study (DTS), received draft final report from the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (VNTSC), the contractor conducting the study. February, 2004 - FRA completed review of DFR and submitted editorial corrections back to VNTSC. Final draft of the DTS with editorial corrections received from VNTSC in February, 2004. March to September 2004 -

330

GTP Adds Meeting on the National Geothermal Data System Project to Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The design of the National Geothermal Data System (NGDS) was initiated in early fiscal year 2010 to address capturing and providing geothermal data to users -- researchers, industry, state and federal agencies, and the public.

331

Completed Projects | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Completed Projects Completed Projects Project Assessment (OPA) OPA Home About Project Management SC Projects Review Dates (updated November 2013) Project Construction Photos Completed Projects Current Projects Other Links SC Federal Project Directors (FPD) and FPD Resources Contact Information Project Assessment U.S. Department of Energy SC-28/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4840 F: (301) 903-8520 E: sc.opa@science.doe.gov Project Construction Photos Completed Projects Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Photos of completed SC projects Advanced Photon Source External link Building 51 and Bevatron D&D .pdf file (1.1MB) LHC ATLAS .pdf file (322KB) LHC CMS .pdf file (166KB) Linac Coherent Light Source .pdf file (4.6MB)

332

Ongoing Projects | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Current Projects Current Projects Project Assessment (OPA) OPA Home About Project Management SC Projects Review Dates (updated November 2013) Project Construction Photos Completed Projects Current Projects Other Links SC Federal Project Directors (FPD) and FPD Resources Contact Information Project Assessment U.S. Department of Energy SC-28/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4840 F: (301) 903-8520 E: sc.opa@science.doe.gov Project Construction Photos Current Projects Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Photos of current SC Projects 12 GeV CEBAF Upgrade .pdf file (3.2MB) Daya Bay .pdf file (1.0MB) National Spherical Torus Experiment (NSTX) .pdf file (841KB) National Synchrotron Light Source II (NSLS II) .pdf file (6.4MB)

333

Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Recovery Act to Recovery Act to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Recovery Act on AddThis.com... Energy Savings Performance Contracts ENABLE Utility Energy Service Contracts On-Site Renewable Power Purchase Agreements Energy Incentive Programs Recovery Act Technical Assistance Projects Project Stories Recovery Act The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 included funding for the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) to facilitate the Federal

334

Request for Information on Permitting of Transmission Lines: Federal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Request for Information on Permitting of Transmission Lines: Request for Information on Permitting of Transmission Lines: Federal Register Notice Volume 77, No. 38 - Feb. 27, 2012 Request for Information on Permitting of Transmission Lines: Federal Register Notice Volume 77, No. 38 - Feb. 27, 2012 The Department of Energy's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability requested information on questions related to permitting of transmission lines. Infrastructure projects - such as high voltage, long distance, electric transmission facilities - often involve multiple Federal, State, local and Tribal authorizations and are subject to a wide array of processes and procedural requirements in order to obtain all necessary permits and other authorizations. Delays in securing required statutory reviews, permits, and consultations can threaten the completion

335

Request for Information on Permitting of Transmission Lines: Federal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Request for Information on Permitting of Transmission Lines: Request for Information on Permitting of Transmission Lines: Federal Register Notice Volume 77, No. 38 - Feb. 27, 2012 Request for Information on Permitting of Transmission Lines: Federal Register Notice Volume 77, No. 38 - Feb. 27, 2012 The Department of Energy's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability requested information on questions related to permitting of transmission lines. Infrastructure projects - such as high voltage, long distance, electric transmission facilities - often involve multiple Federal, State, local and Tribal authorizations and are subject to a wide array of processes and procedural requirements in order to obtain all necessary permits and other authorizations. Delays in securing required statutory reviews, permits, and consultations can threaten the completion

336

Federal Railroad Administration  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Legislation Legislation Kevin R. Blackwell FRA Hazmat Division Washington, DC Federal Railroad Safety Accountability and Improvement Act of 2007 (FRSAIA)-H.R. 1516 /S. 918 DOT supports this reauthorization bill over H.R. 2095 The provisions of H.R. 2095, while not exactly the same, are very similar to this bill in regard to the core provisions Core provisions: Review and reform the Federal hours of service requirements Establish a new risk reduction program alongside the current existing safety program, and Mandate reporting by States and railroads to the DOT's National Crossing Inventory Federal Railroad Safety Improvement Act of 2007 (FRSIA) - H.R. 2095 Letter from DOT's General Counsel's office addressing DOT's

337

Federal Energy Management Program: Utility Contract Competition  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Competition to someone by E-mail Competition to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Utility Contract Competition on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Utility Contract Competition on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Utility Contract Competition on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Utility Contract Competition on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Utility Contract Competition on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Utility Contract Competition on AddThis.com... Energy Savings Performance Contracts ENABLE Utility Energy Service Contracts Types of Contracts Laws & Regulations Best Practices Financing Decrease Interest Buydown & Buyout Approaches Contract Competition Diversify Project Portfolios

338

Project Construction Team | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Project Construction Team Project Construction Team Project Construction Team October 16, 2013 - 5:06pm Addthis Photo of two men reviewing a large print document. Both men are wearing construction hats and bright vests. A construction team reviews plans for a 1.9 megawatt methane power generator for a U.S. Marine Corps landfill gas-to-energy project. Assembling the right project construction team is crucial and begins with the request for proposal (RFP). Federal agencies create and RFP for construction services using construction documents developed during the final stage of building design. Construction documents are the blueprints on which every project is built and will be used to generate bids for the construction phase of the project. Renewable energy will either be specified in detail in the

339

Carbon pay back period for solar and wind energy project installed in India: A critical review  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

All renewable energy systems make some contribution to climate change. This is due to fuel combusted for their construction and as back up energy during their operation. Accurate calculation of greenhouse gas emission per kilowatt hour of electricity is difficult but is an important part of policy making and planning. This study, an attempt has been made to analyze and review the development and potential of wind and solar energy in India. LCA has been carried out for the on shore wind turbine and poly crystalline PV module. Based on the past studies, life cycle inventory data has been collected for the investigation. Using that data, the detailed investigation has been made for the existing grid connected 1.65MW wind turbine project in and around Udumalpet, Tamil Nadu and 25kW Roof top solar PV Power plant at Sewa Bhawan, New Delhi. Carbon intensity, energy pay back period and carbon pay back period for the above system have been calculated and compared with each other.

C. Marimuthu; V. Kirubakaran

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

340

Review Dates (updated October 2013) | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Review Review Dates (updated November 2013) Project Assessment (OPA) OPA Home About Project Management SC Projects Review Dates (updated November 2013) Project Construction Photos Other Links SC Federal Project Directors (FPD) and FPD Resources Contact Information Project Assessment U.S. Department of Energy SC-28/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4840 F: (301) 903-8520 E: sc.opa@science.doe.gov SC Projects Review Dates (updated November 2013) Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Project Location Date National Synchrotron Light Source-II (NSLS-II) Mini Review GTN 12/4/13 12 GeV Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility (CEBAF) Upgrade Mini Review GTN 12/9/13 National Synchrotron Light Source-II (NSLS-II) BNL 1/29-30/14

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

S. 522: A Bill to provide for a limited exemption to the hydroelectric licensing provisions of part I of the Federal Power Act for certain transmission facilities associated with the El Vado Hydroelectric Project in New Mexico. Introduced in the Senate of the United States, One Hundred Fourth Congress, First session  

SciTech Connect

This report discusses a bill that provides for a limited exemption to part I of the Federal Power Act dealing with the hydroelectric licensing provisions for certain transmission facilities associated with the El Vado Hydroelectric project in New Mexico.

NONE

1995-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

342

NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM DOE/CX-00088 I. Project Title: CH2f"JHill Plateau Remediation Company -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10 Number: 10 Number: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM DOE/CX-00088 I. Project Title: CH2f"JHill Plateau Remediation Company - Cleanup Actions, December 2012 to December 2013 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions. e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company (PRC) will be conducting cleanup actions on the Hanford Site in accordance with the categorical exclusion (CX) referenced in 10 CFR 1021, B, CX B6.1 ''Cleanup actions". PRC Projects include all those identified Sections . 3 and J.l4 of the PRC Contract, DE-AC06-08RL14788. Small-scale, short-term cleanup actions, under RCRA, Atomic Energy Act, or other

343

Strengthening Federal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Jan. 24 Jan. 24 / Administration of George W. Bush, 2007 Executive Order 13423- Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management January 24, 2007 By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and to strengthen the environmental, energy, and transpor- tation management of Federal agencies, it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. Policy. It is the policy of the United States that Federal agencies conduct their environmental, transportation, and en- ergy-related activities under the law in sup- port of their respective missions in an envi- ronmentally, economically and fiscally sound, integrated, continuously improving, efficient, and sustainable manner. Sec. 2. Goals for Agencies. In imple-

344

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

44 44 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 12, 1996 / Notices will be issued this fall in accordance with the reallocation procedures contained in the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA). Under section 442(e) of the HEA, unexpended FWS funds returned to the Secretary must be reallocated to eligible institutions that used at least 10 percent of the total FWS Federal funds granted to the institution to compensate students employed in community services. Because reallocated FWS funds will be distributed on the basis of fair share shortfall criteria, institutions must also have a fair share shortfall to receive these funds. Institutions must use all the reallocated FWS Federal funds to compensate students employed in community services. To ensure

345

Energy Smart Federal Partnership: Your Steps to Energy Savings  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Smart Federal Partnership: Your Steps to Energy Savings Energy Smart Federal Partnership: Your Steps to Energy Savings 1. Review your facilities and commitment to efficiency investments  Communicate with key facilities staff including the people that will approve the energy project budgets.  Determine if the energy-saving opportunities meet your agency's requirements for investment (such as project payback) and are likely to receive funding approval.  Contact your local serving utility or utilities to discuss your plans and understand the process for obtaining financial assistance (incentives). If you are unsure who your serving utility is, please contact BPA and we will help. Another good resource for locating utilities can be found our website: http://www.bpa.gov/Energy/N/UtilityLocator.cfm.

346

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Soil and Groundwater Remediation Project- March 2007  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Evaluation to determine whether Soil and Groundwater Remediation Project is performing at a level deserving DOE-VPP recognition.

347

W-519 Sagebrush Mitigation Project FY-2004 Final Review and Status  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes activities conducted as mitigation for loss of sagebrush-steppe habitats due to Project W-519, the construction of the infrastructure for the Tank Waste Remediation System Vitrification Plant. The focus of this report is to provide a review and final status of mitigation actions performed through FY2004. Data collected since FY1999 have been included where appropriate. The Mitigation Action Plan (MAP) for Project W-519 prescribed three general actions to be performed as mitigation for the disturbance of approximately 40 ha (100 acres) of mature sagebrush-steppe habitat. These actions included: (1) transplanting approximately 130,000 sagebrush seedlings on the Fitzner-Eberhardt Arid Lands Ecology Reserve (ALE); (2) rectification of the new transmission line corridor via seeding with native grasses and sagebrush; and (3) research on native plant species with a goal of increasing species diversity in future mitigation or restoration actions. Nearly 130,000 Wyoming big sagebrush seedlings where planted on ALE during FY2000 and FY2001. About 39,000 of those seedlings were burned during the 24-Command Fire of June 2000. The surviving and subsequent replanting has resulted in about 91,000 seedlings that were planted across four general areas on ALE. A 50% survival rate at any monitoring period was defined as the performance standard in the MAP for this project. Data collected in 2004 indicate that of the over 5000 monitored plants, 51.1% are still alive, and of those the majority are thriving and blooming. These results support the potential for natural recruitment and the ultimate goal of wildlife habitat replacement. Thus, the basic performance standard for sagebrush survival within the habitat compensation planting has been met. Monitoring activities conducted in 2004 indicate considerable variation in seedling survival depending on the type of plant material, site conditions, and to a lesser extent, treatments performed at the time of planting. The principle findings include: (1) a clear indication that in most settings, bare-root seedling survival is considerably higher than tubling survival; (2) we can expect low plant survival at sites with a high cover of large native bunchgrasses--especially bluebunch wheatgrass; (3) mycorrhizal root treatments appeared to increase growth and survival at the Coppice Dune and 98-Burn Undisturbed sites, but appeared to have little effect at the 98-Burn Disturbed, 111-Road Sitanion, or Cold Creek sites; (4) use of a hydrogel dip at planting increases survival of bare-root plants compared to dipping roots in plain water; (5) reducing leaf area via clipping after planting did not increase survival of bare-root plants; (6) seedlings planted on a south-aspect hillside at the Lower Cold Creek planting area had higher survival than seedlings planted on the hilltop or northern-aspects although these survival rates were lower than the survival rate down on the flats at this same location. Rectification of the transmission line corridor occurred in early March 2001, with the broadcast seeding of Sandberg's bluegrass and sagebrush. Success criteria for this site-of-disturbance rectification required a grass establishment after four years with greater than 25% total canopy cover with 60% of the plant cover from planted species (DOE 1998). This planting met the total canopy criterion but failed the criterion of 60% relative coverage of planted species. Although the performance standard was not met, the planting is not necessarily a failure; the communities on the tower pads appear to be developing toward the desired end state. We feel that there are no reasonable mitigative actions that can be taken at this time that would significantly alter or speed up the plant community development on these sites. In fact, most options, such as overseeding, may cause damage to the currently establishing communities on those sites.

Durham, Robin E.; Sackschewsky, Michael R.

2004-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

348

Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Renewable Energy Renewable Energy Working Group to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group on AddThis.com... Energy-Efficient Products Technology Deployment Renewable Energy Federal Requirements Renewable Resources & Technologies Project Planning & Implementation Project Assistance Resource Maps & Screening Tools

349

Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Integrated Waste Treatment Uinit Contractor Operational Readiness Review, June 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Contractor Contractor Operational Readiness Review June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 4.0 Results ................................................................................................................................................... 2

350

Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Integrated Waste Treatment Uinit Contractor Operational Readiness Review, June 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractor Contractor Operational Readiness Review June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 4.0 Results ................................................................................................................................................... 2

351

REVIEWS  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......December 1950 book-review REVIEWS REVIEWS R. E. BEARD Statistics...Price 20s. [453 ] REVIEWS Statistics, Volume I...regard to the mathematical standard required by the Institute...distributions.' The general plan of the book is first......

R. E. BEARD

1950-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

352

A Database Management System for the Federal Courts  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

A Database Management System for the Federal Courts JACK R. BUCHANAN, RICHARD D. FENNELL Federal Making Information Systems, Inc., McLean, VA 22101; R. D. Fennell, Federal Judicial Center, Washington, D and several large-scale information management systems projects have been undertaken within the Federal

Samet, Hanan

353

UC DAVIS -FEDERAL GRANT FINANCIAL REPORTING INFORMATION INFORMATION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

UC DAVIS - FEDERAL GRANT FINANCIAL REPORTING INFORMATION GENERAL INFORMATION · The University is required by Federal sponsors to submit Financial Status Reports (FSRs) on all federal awards no later than.) o Extension of final budget period of a project period without additional Federal funds. o Change

Schladow, S. Geoffrey

354

CRAD, Safety Basis- Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a November 2003 assessment of the Safety Basis portion of an Operational Readiness Review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project.

355

CRAD, Conduct of Operations- Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a November, 2003 assessment of the Conduct of Operations Program portion of an Operational Readiness Review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TRU ALPHA LLWT Project.

356

CRAD, Radiological Controls- Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a November 2003 assessment of the Radiation Protection Program portion of an Operational Readiness Review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project.

357

CRAD, Quality Assurance- Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a November 2003 assessment of the Quality Assurance Program portion of an Operational Readiness Review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project.

358

A cross-sectional review: Impacts and sustainability of small-scale renewable energy projects in developing countries  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract Access to sustainable and affordable energy services is a crucial factor in reducing poverty in developing countries. In particular, small-scale and community-based renewable energy projects are recognized as important forms of development assistance for reaching the energy poor. However, to date only a few empirical evaluations exist which analyze and compare the impact of these projects on local living conditions and their sustainability ex-post implementation. To better understand the impacts and the conditions that influence sustainability of these projects, the research presented in this paper evaluated 23 local development projects post implementation. By applying an standardized evaluation design to a cross-sectional sample in terms of renewable energy sources (solar, wind, biomass, hydro), user needs (electricity, food preparation, lighting, productive uses), community management models, finance mechanisms and geographical locations, the review results provide valuable insights on the underlying conditions that influence the success or failure of these small-scale local energy interventions. The empirical evidence suggests that the sustainability of small-scale energy implementations (?100kW) in developing countries is determined by the same factors, independent of the socio-cultural, political and ecological context. These findings allow to better predict the long-term success of small sustainable energy projects in developing countries, this can help to improve project designs and increase the certainty for future investment decisions.

Julia Terrapon-Pfaff; Carmen Dienst; Julian Knig; Willington Ortiz

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

359

Notice of Open Meeting, Federal Register, 64 FR 44912, August 18, 1999  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Document displays the notice of open meeting for Measurement and Verification Guidelines for Federal Energy Projects, which was published in the Federal Register on August 18, 1999.

360

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: AEP Ohio gridSMART Demonstration Project - Karen Sloneker, Columbus Southern Power (AEP)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Program Peer Review Meeting AEP Ohio gridSMART ® Demonstration Project Karen Sloneker AEP Ohio gridSMART Project Director ® December 2008 AEP Ohio gridSMART ® Demonstration Project Objectives * To build an integrated secure smart grid infrastructure. * Attract, educate, enlist and retain consumers using innovative business models that provide tools to reduce costs, consumption and peak demand. * Gather data on technology and smart grid business models to forecast national impact. Life-cycle Funding 2010 - 2013 $73,660,317 Technical Scope (Insert graphic here) * 110,000 AMI meters and associated infrastructure * Consumer Managed Energy Technology (experimental tariffs, consumer programs, web portal; smart appliances, and plug-in electric vehicles) * Innovative Demand Management * Distribution Automation and Reliability

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Status Review of Wildlife Mitigation at 14 of 27 Major Hydroelectric Projects in Idaho, 1983-1984 Final Report.  

SciTech Connect

The Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act and wildlife and their habitats in the Columbia River Basin and to compliance with the Program, the wildlife mitigation status reports coordination with resource agencies and Indian Tribes. developed the Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program development, operation, and maintenance of hydroelectric projects on existing agreements; and past, current, and proposed wildlife factual review and documentation of existing information on wildlife meet the requirements of Measure 1004(b)(l) of the Program. The mitigation, enhancement, and protection activities were considered. In mitigate for the losses to those resources resulting from the purpose of these wildlife mitigation status reports is to provide a resources at some of the Columbia River Basin hydroelectric projects the river and its tributaries. To accomplish this goal, the Council were written with the cooperation of project operators, and in within Idaho.

Martin, Robert C.; Mehrhoff, L.A.

1985-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

362

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: Pacific Northwest Smart Grid Demonstration Project - Ron Melton, Battelle Memorial Institute  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Overview Overview Ron Melton, Ph.D., Project Director Don Hammerstrom, Ph.D., Principal Investigator Battelle, Pacific Northwest Division Presented at DOE-OE Smart Grid R&D Peer Review June 8, 2012 PNWD-SA-9876 Pacific Northwest Demonstration Project What: * $178M, ARRA-funded, 5-year demonstration * 60,000 metered customers in 5 states Why: * Quantify costs and benefits * Develop communications protocol * Develop standards * Facilitate integration of wind and other renewables Who: Led by Battelle and partners including BPA, 11 utilities, 2 universities, and 5 vendors 2 Project Basics 3 Transactive Control Operational objectives Manage peak demand Facilitate renewable resources Address constrained resources Improve system reliability and efficiency Select economical

363

Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Renewable  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Renewable Energy Project Funding to someone by E-mail Renewable Energy Project Funding to someone by E-mail Share Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Renewable Energy Project Funding on Facebook Tweet about Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Renewable Energy Project Funding on Twitter Bookmark Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Renewable Energy Project Funding on Google Bookmark Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Renewable Energy Project Funding on Delicious Rank Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Renewable Energy Project Funding on Digg Find More places to share Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Renewable Energy Project Funding on AddThis.com...

364

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Plutonium Finishing Plant Closure Project- May 2007  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Evaluation to determine whether Plutonium Finishing Plant Closure Project is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

365

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, River Corridor Closure Project- June 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Evaluation to determine whether River Corridor Closure Project is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

366

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project- May 2009  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Evaluation to determine whether Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

367

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, West Valley Demonstration Project- November 2009  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Evaluation to determine whether West Valley Demonstration Project is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

368

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, West Valley Demonstration Project- June 2008  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Evaluation to determine whether West Valley Demonstration Project is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

369

RL-721 REV? I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Project and Cold War Era Historic District Treatment Plan" (DOERL-97-56); the "Cultural Resources Management Plan" (DOERL-98-10), and other applicable guidance documents and...

370

RL-721 REV7 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Project and Cold War Era Historic District Treatment Plan" (DOERL-97-56; the "Cultural Resources Management Plan" (DOERL-98-10, and other applicable guidance documents and...

371

RL-721 REV7 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Project and Cold War Era Historic District Treatment Plan" (DOERL-97-56); the "Cultural Resources Management Plan" (DOERL-98-10), and other applicable guidance documents and...

372

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Waste Treatment Plant Construction Project- June 2010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Evaluation to determine whether Waste Treatment Plant Construction Project is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

373

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Salt Waste Processing Facility Construction Project- February 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Evaluation to determine whether Salt Waste Processing Facility Construction Project is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

374

Energy Savings Performance Contract Federal Financing Specialists |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Savings Performance Contract Federal Financing Specialists Energy Savings Performance Contract Federal Financing Specialists Energy Savings Performance Contract Federal Financing Specialists October 7, 2013 - 1:38pm Addthis The Federal Energy Management Program's Federal financing specialists (FFSs) help agencies launch energy savings performance contract (ESPC) projects. These specialists assist agencies by: Explaining performance contracting to site staff and management Determining whether a ESPC project is feasible Forming an agency acquisition team Determining agency project decision makers Partnering with energy service companies. Contact a FEMP FFS below to get started with an ESPC project. Contacts Name States Served Scott Wolf 360-866-9163 Serving: Montana, Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Minnesota, New Mexico, Alaska, Washington, Oregon, Idaho, California, Nevada, Arizona, Hawaii, North Marianas, Palau, Guam, American Samoa Regions

375

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Catalyst Characterization (Agreement ID:9130) Project ID:18519  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by Cummins at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about catalyst characterization.

376

Energy Storage Systems 2012 Peer Review Presentations- Poster Session 1 (Day 1): National Lab Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) conducted a peer review and update meeting in Washington, DC on Sept. 26 28, 2012.

377

Supplemental Figures and Tables for Groundfish EFH Review Phase 1 Report "Federal and State Marine Protected Areas Type of Fishing Restriction"  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

"Federal and State Marine Protected Areas ­ Type of Fishing Restriction" Author and state MPAs depicted in map figures, categorized by level of fishing restriction Fishing Restriction BEFORE AFTER Commercial and Recreational Fishing Prohibited

Goldfinger, Chris

378

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

901 901 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 1, 2004 / Notices As a result of this dispute, the SLA requested the Secretary of Education to convene a Federal arbitration panel to hear this complaint. A panel was convened, and a hearing on this matter was held on May 13, 2002. Arbitration Panel Decision The arbitration panel heard the following issue: whether the Army's alleged failure to negotiate with the SLA in good faith for the full food services and dining facility attendant services contract at Ft. Campbell, Kentucky, constituted a violation of the Act (20 U.S.C. 107 et seq.) and the implementing regulations in 34 CFR part 395. After considering the evidence presented, the majority of the panel ruled that the Act clearly covers all

379

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

25 25 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 224 / Thursday, November 20, 1997 / Notices implementation from 8:30 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. For the rest of the day, the Council will meet with representatives from the State School-to-Work Implementation Grantees in small groups to discuss and determine strategies for addressing State sustainability issues. The meeting will close with a summary of the day's meeting and a discussion of future actions. Public Participation: The meeting on Tuesday, December 2, 1997, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. at the Renaissance Mayflower Hotel, will be open to the public. Seats will be reserved for the media. Individuals with disabilities in need of special accommodations should contact the Designated Federal Official (DFO), listed below, at least seven (7)

380

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 47 / Friday, March 8, 1996 / Notices Comment date: March 18, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E at the end of this notice. 13. Benjamin F. Montoya [Docket No. ID-2945-000] Take notice that on February 23, 1996, Benjamin F. Montoya (Applicant) tendered for filing an application under Section 305(b) of the Federal Power Act to hold the following positions: President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Public Service Company of New Mexico, a New Mexico corporation Director, Northwest Corporation Comment date: March 15, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E at the end of this notice. 14. Montana Power Company [Docket No. TX96-6-000] Take notice that on February 26, 1996, Montana Power Company (MPC) tendered for filing an application

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Project  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Exploring the Standard Model Exploring the Standard Model       You've heard a lot about the Standard Model and the pieces are hopefully beginning to fall into place. However, even a thorough understanding of the Standard Model is not the end of the story but the beginning. By exploring the structure and details of the Standard Model we encounter new questions. Why do the most fundamental particles have the particular masses we observe? Why aren't they all symmetric? How is the mass of a particle related to the masses of its constituents? Is there any other way of organizing the Standard Model? The activities in this project will elucidate but not answer our questions. The Standard Model tells us how particles behave but not necessarily why they do so. The conversation is only beginning. . . .

382

Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Fleets Federal Fleets The Federal Fleet Program Overview outlines FEMP services and assistance available to Federal fleet managers to increase the use of alternative fuels and advanced vehicles. FEMP's Sustainable Federal Fleets website provides guidance and assistance to help implement Federal legislative and regulatory requirements mandating reduced petroleum consumption and increased alternative fuel use. FEMP's efforts include assisting agencies with implementing and managing energy-efficient and alternative fuel vehicles and facilitating a coordinated effort to reduce petroleum consumption and increase alternative fuel use annually. Content on Sustainable Federal Fleets spans Federal requirements and reporting compliance, alternative fuels and advanced vehicles, fleet performance data, analysis services, information resources, and FEMP contacts.

383

Renewable Project Overview  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Project Overview Project Overview Federal Utility Partnership Working Group 5/6/09 Chandra Shah, NREL 303-384-7557, chandra.shah@nrel.gov National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future Presentation Overview Federal and utility renewable requirements Power Purchase Agreements (PPA) Western Area Power Administration Federal Renewable Program UESC and renewables * Participating in utility renewable programs - Opportunity Announcement process Renewable projects implemented using appropriations National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future Biomass Resource

384

CRAD, Conduct of Operations- Idaho Accelerated Retrieval Project Phase II  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a February, 2006 Commencement of Operations assessment of the Conduct of Operations program at the Idaho Accelerated Retrieval Project Phase II.

385

CRAD, Radiological Controls- Idaho Accelerated Retrieval Project Phase II  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a February 2006 Commencement of Operations assessment of the Radiation Protection Program at the Idaho Accelerated Retrieval Project Phase II.

386

CRAD, Occupational Safety & Health- Idaho Accelerated Retrieval Project Phase II  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a February 2006 Commencement of Operations assessment of the Occupational Safety and Industrial Hygiene Program at the Idaho Accelerated Retrieval Project Phase II.

387

CRAD, Emergency Management- Idaho Accelerated Retrieval Project Phase II  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a February 2006 Commencement of Operations assessment of the Emergency Management program at the Idaho Accelerated Retrieval Project Phase II.

388

CRAD, Criticality Safety- Idaho Accelerated Retrieval Project Phase II  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a February 2006 Commencement of Operations assessment of the Criticality Safety program at the Idaho Accelerated Retrieval Project Phase II.

389

CRAD, Quality Assurance- Idaho Accelerated Retrieval Project Phase II  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a February 2006 Commencement of Operations assessment of the Quality Assurance Program at the Idaho Accelerated Retrieval Project Phase II.

390

Parker-Davis Project  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Parker-Davis Project Remarketing Effort Reference Material Decision to Apply EPAMP Federal Register Notices Firm Electric Service Amendment Process Resource Pool & Applicant...

391

Barstow Wind Turbine Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation covers the Barstow Wind Turbine project for the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meeting, held on November 18-19, 2009.

392

Project Finance Case Studies  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation covers the Project Finance Case Studies and is given at the Spring 2010 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meeting in Rapid City, South Dakota.

393

A guidebook to alternative energy projects on American Samoa, The Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, The Federated States of Micronesia, Guam, and The Republics of the Marshall Islands and Palau. [Contains bibliography  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this guidebook is to help transfer information concerning alternative energy projects that have been tried on the Pacific islands affiliated with the US. These islands include those in American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia (Kosrae, Pohnpei, Truk, and Yap), Guam, and the Republics of the Marshall Islands and Palau. Distances are long between islands and populations are sparse, making communication and the transfer of information particularly difficult. A project that works on American Samoa might be appropriate for Yap, but to get this information to the proper people on Yap in a reasonable period of time is extremely difficult. This book describes 100 alternative energy projects that have been tried on the islands since the mid-1970's. This description and record of what has been done to date should be a source of ideas for energy workers, reduce duplication of work, and help encourage successes by describing other successes and failures. Alternative energy projects are projects that use indigenous, renewable resources in order to reduce local dependency on imported petroleum for electricity or liquid fuels. The islands have an apparent abundance of natural resources for this purpose such as the sun, rivers, vegetation, the ocean, and wind; and, ideally, it should be relatively simple to convert these resources to electricity or fuel. However, there are problems unique to the remote, tropical Pacific that often appear insurmountable, and successes to date are the results of unusual persistence, hard work, and ingenuity of those on the islands. Projects are confined to those that actually develop or demonstrate hardware. These projects use the complete spectrum of alternative technologies such as biomass conversion, wind electric, solar water heating, photovoltaics, wind water pumping, hydroelectric, water desalination, and integrated systems. 381 refs., 85 figs.

Case, C.W.

1987-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

394

Federal Railroad Administration  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Update Du Update Du Jour Department Of Energy Transportation External Coordination Working Group Meeting Albuquerque, New Mexico April 21-23, 2004 Presented by Kevin R. Blackwell Radioactive Materials Program Manager Federal Railroad Administration Federal Railroad Administration Dedicated Train Study- Report to Congress FRA' s Research & Development Office (as lead on the study) received a draft final report from the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (VNTSC) in late November, 2003. Editorial corrections were made and a final draft dated February, 2004 was provided to FRA. Final Draft Report FRA has been reviewed and been sent to FRA Administrator for clearance and forwarding to DOT OST. FRA has already "Officially Coordinated" and briefed DOT OST and

395

M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Federal Energy...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Federal Energy Projects Version 4.0 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Federal Energy Management Program By

396

Federal Energy Management Program: Distributed-scale Renewable Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Distributed-scale Distributed-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Smaller than 10 MWs) to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Distributed-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Smaller than 10 MWs) on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Distributed-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Smaller than 10 MWs) on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Distributed-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Smaller than 10 MWs) on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Distributed-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Smaller than 10 MWs) on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Distributed-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Smaller than 10 MWs) on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Distributed-scale Renewable Energy Projects (Smaller than 10 MWs) on

397

RL-721 REV7 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, Rev 1 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Air Conditioning Systems for Existing Equipment under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B1.4 for Calendar Year 2014 II. Project...

398

RL-721 REV7 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Air Conditioning Systems for Existing Equipment under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B1.4 for Calendar Year 2015. II. Project...

399

RL-721 REV7 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Air Conditioning Systems for Existing Equipment under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B1.4 for Calendar Year 2014 II. Project Description...

400

E-Print Network 3.0 - ads projects review Sample Search Results  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 61 HOW FACULTY PARTICIPATE IN REGIONAL PROJECT ACTIVITIES AT THE IOWA AGRICULTURE AND HOME ECONOMICS EXPERIMENT STATION Summary: or Investigator on the CRIS forms...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

RL-721 REV? I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, Rev 1 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Disconnection of Utilities under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B1.27 for Calendar Year 2014 II. Project Description and Location...

402

RL-721 REV? I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Disconnection of Utilities under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B1.27 for Calendar Year 2015. II. Project Description and Location...

403

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Class 8 Truck Freight Efficiency Improvement Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by Daimler Truck North America LLC at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about Class 8 Truck...

404

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Central Texas Fuel Independence Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by City of Austin at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about Central Texas Fuel...

405

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: California Fleets and Workplace Alternative Fuels Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by Bay Area Air Quality Management District at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about...

406

Environmental Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environmental-Review Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects & Initiatives Expand Projects & Initiatives Finance...

407

Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Training  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Training to someone by E-mail Training to someone by E-mail Share Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Training on Facebook Tweet about Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Training on Twitter Bookmark Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Training on Google Bookmark Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Training on Delicious Rank Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Training on Digg Find More places to share Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Training on AddThis.com... Home Introduction Assessing Renewable Energy Options Planning, Programming, & Budgeting Project Funding Building Design Project Construction Commissioning Operations & Maintenance

408

Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Outreach  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Outreach to someone by E-mail Outreach to someone by E-mail Share Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Outreach on Facebook Tweet about Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Outreach on Twitter Bookmark Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Outreach on Google Bookmark Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Outreach on Delicious Rank Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Outreach on Digg Find More places to share Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Outreach on AddThis.com... Home Introduction Assessing Renewable Energy Options Planning, Programming, & Budgeting Project Funding Building Design Project Construction Commissioning Operations & Maintenance

409

Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Resources  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Resources to someone by E-mail Resources to someone by E-mail Share Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Resources on Facebook Tweet about Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Resources on Twitter Bookmark Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Resources on Google Bookmark Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Resources on Delicious Rank Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Resources on Digg Find More places to share Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Resources on AddThis.com... Home Introduction Assessing Renewable Energy Options Planning, Programming, & Budgeting Project Funding Building Design Project Construction Commissioning Operations & Maintenance

410

REVIEWS  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......December 1959 book-review REVIEWS REVIEWS E. S. PEARSON The Advanced...433 . 84s. [491 ] REVIEWS The Advanced Theory of...the same comprehensive standard, three volumes will...inserted in the original plan at this half-way stage......

E. S. PEARSON

1959-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

411

Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......book-review Reviews Reviews Factors for One-sided...for Variables Sampling Plans. By D. B. OWEN. Sandia...Pp. 412 . 5.00. Reviews 293 Handbook of Nonparametric...for Variables Sampling Plans. By D. B. OWEN. Sandia...expected value ft and standard deviation cr/^/n......

Reviews

1964-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

412

Notice of public meeting and additional opportunity for public review and comment for the WAPA Eastern Plains Transmission Project (DOE/EIS-0390)(06/04/07)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

792 Federal Register 792 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 106 / Monday, June 4, 2007 / Notices Training Activity Support System (STASS), Navy Personnel Command, Application for Tuition, the Marine Corps and Coast Guard personnel systems extracts, Assistance Form (NAVMC 10883), education counselors, educational institutions, Tuition Assistance Authorization Form (NAVEDTRA 1560/5), and Academic contractor. EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM: None. [FR Doc. E7-10683 Filed 6-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001-06-P DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request AGENCY: Department of Education. SUMMARY: The IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management invites comments on the submission for OMB review as required by the Paperwork

413

Quality Managment Program (QMP) report: A review of quality management programs developed in response to Title 10, Section 35.32 of the Code of Federal Regulations  

SciTech Connect

In July of 1991, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission published a Final Rule in the Federal Register amending regulations governing medical therapeutic administrations of byproduct material and certain uses of radioactive sodium iodide. These amendments required implementation of a Quality Management Program (QMP) to provide high confidence that the byproduct material -- or radiation from byproduct material -- will be administered as directed by an authorized user physician. Herein, this rule is referred to as the QM rule. The Final Rule was published after two proposed rules had been published in the Federal Register.

Witte, M.C.

1994-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

414

Notice of Availability of Plains & Eastern Clean Line Transmission Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Public Hearings: Federal Register Notice, Volume 79, No. 242- Dec. 17, 2014  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announces the availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Plains & Eastern Clean Line Transmission Project (DOE/EIS0486; Draft EIS) for a 90-day public comment period. DOE also announces 15 public hearings to receive comments on the Draft EIS. In addition, DOE invites comments on the National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 process and any potential adverse impacts to historic properties from the proposed Project.

415

Economic Development Impacts of Community Wind Projects: A Review and Empirical Evaluation; Preprint  

SciTech Connect

'Community wind' refers to a class of wind energy ownership structures. The extent of local ownership may range from a small minority share to full ownership by persons in the immediate area surrounding the wind project site. Potential project owners include local farmers, businesses, Native American tribes, universities, cooperatives, or any other local entity seeking to invest in wind energy. The opposite of community wind is an 'absentee' project, in which ownership is completely removed from the state and community surrounding the facility. Thus, there is little or no ongoing direct financial benefit to state and local populations aside from salaries for local repair technicians, local property tax payments, and land lease payments. In recent years, the community wind sector has been inhibited by manufacturers' preference for larger turbine orders. This often puts smaller community wind developers and projects at a competitive disadvantage. However, state policies specifically supporting community wind may become a more influential market factor as turbines are now more readily available given manufacturer ramp-ups and the slow-down in the industry that has accompanied the recent economic and financial crises. This report examines existing literature to provide an overview of economic impacts resulting from community wind projects, compares results, and explains variability.

Lantz, E.; Tegen, S.

2009-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

416

Review of Commercial Grade Dedication Plans for the Safety Instrumented System at the Savannah River Site Waste Solidification Building Project, August 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review of Review of Commercial Grade Dedication Plans for the Safety Instrumented System at the Savannah River Site Waste Solidification Building Project May 2011 August 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 2

417

Review of Electrical System Configuration Management and Design Change Control at the Savannah River Site, Waste Solidification Building Project, July 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Review of Independent Review of Electrical System Configuration Management and Design Change Control at the Savannah River Site, Waste Solidification Building Project July 2011 Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ......................................................................................................................................1 2.0 Scope .........................................................................................................................................1 3.0 Background ...............................................................................................................................2

418

Review of Commercial Grade Dedication Plans for the Safety Instrumented System at the Savannah River Site Waste Solidification Building Project, August 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Review of Review of Commercial Grade Dedication Plans for the Safety Instrumented System at the Savannah River Site Waste Solidification Building Project May 2011 August 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 2

419

Review of Electrical System Configuration Management and Design Change Control at the Savannah River Site, Waste Solidification Building Project, July 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Independent Review of Independent Review of Electrical System Configuration Management and Design Change Control at the Savannah River Site, Waste Solidification Building Project July 2011 Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ......................................................................................................................................1 2.0 Scope .........................................................................................................................................1 3.0 Background ...............................................................................................................................2

420

ESS 2012 Peer Review - NYSERDA Energy Storage Projects - Dhruv Bhatnagar, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NYSERDA Energy Storage Projects NYSERDA Energy Storage Projects Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. SAND No. 2011-XXXXP NaS Battery at MTA Long Island Bus Depot Beacon Flywheel Plant at Stephentown, NY 4 Demonstration Project Sites 1) Beacon Flywheel Plant at Stephentown, NY * Ancillary services in NYISO 2) NaS Battery at MTA Long Island Bus Depot * Time of day load shifting to avoid TOU rates 3) Flow Battery at Niagara Falls State Park * Renewables integration/firming &

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Independent management and financial review, Yucca Mountain Project, Nevada. Final report, Appendix  

SciTech Connect

The Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (Public Law 97-425), as amended by Public Law 100-203, December 22, 1987, established the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) within the Department of Energy (DOE), and directed the Office to investigate a site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, to determine if this site is suitable for the construction of a repository for the disposal of high level nuclear waste. Work on site characterization has been under way for several years. Thus far, about $1.47 billion have been spent on Yucca Mountain programs. This work has been funded by Congressional appropriations from a Nuclear Waste Fund to which contributions have been made by electric utility ratepayers through electric utilities generating power from nuclear power stations. The Secretary of Energy and the Governor of the State of Nevada have appointed one person each to a panel to oversee an objective, independent financial and management evaluation of the Yucca Mountain Project. The Requirements for the work will include an analysis of (1) the Yucca Mountain financial and, contract management techniques and controls; (2) Project schedules and credibility of the proposed milestones; (3) Project organizational effectiveness and internal planning processes, and (4) adequacy of funding levels and funding priorities, including the cost of infrastructure and scientific studies. The recipient will provide monthly progress report and the following reports/documents will be presented as deliverables under the contract: (1) Financial and Contract Management Preliminary Report; (2) Project Scheduling Preliminary Report; (3)Project Organizational Effectiveness Preliminary Report; (4) Project Funding Levels and Funding Priorities Preliminary Report; and (5) Final Report.

NONE

1995-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

422

Review Draft Review Draft  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Review Draft Review Draft Columbia Basin White Sturgeon Planning Framework Prepared a favorable review of specific sturgeon projects but noted that an effective basin-wide management plan passage. A planning framework (this document) was drafted based on a review and synthesis of published

423

Fairbanks Geothermal Energy Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Fairbanks Geothermal Energy Project presentation at the April 2013 peer review meeting held in Denver, Colorado.

424

Desert Peak EGS Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Desert Peak EGS Project presentation at the April 2013 peer review meeting held in Denver, Colorado.

425

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

21 21 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 226 / Friday, November 23, 2001 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY National Energy Technology Laboratory; Notice of Availability of a Financial Assistance Solicitation AGENCY: National Energy Technology Laboratory, Department of Energy (DOE). ACTION: Notice of availability of a financial assistance solicitation. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the intent to issue Financial Assistance Solicitation No. DE-PS26-02NT41423 entitled ''Black Liquor/Biomass Gasification Technology Support Research and Development.'' It is the intent of the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), on behalf of the Office of Industrial Technologies (OIT) in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, to solicit the submission of

426

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 220 / Friday, November 14, 2003 / Notices 1 Because the plants' refueling schedules determine the availability for lead assembly use, Duke Power Company has submitted a license amendment request to the NRC to allow irradiation of MOX lead assemblies at Catawba. The SA also analyzes the use of the McGuire Nuclear Station (McGuire) in North Carolina, which could be used in lieu of Catawba, if a license amendment request were submitted and approved. SUMMARY: The Leader, Regulatory Information Management Group, Office of the Chief Information Officer, invites comments on the proposed information collection requests as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before January

427

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

57 57 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 22, 2005 / Notices shall include a detailed explanation of the dispute. Upon the other Manager's receipt of such notice, that Manager shall have 15 working days to provide to the disputing Party a written answer to the notice and explanation. The notice and answer, including any exhibits thereto, shall be the Record of Dispute. After such 15-day period has expired, the Managers shall make their best efforts to resolve the dispute within 20 working days. C. If the Managers do not resolve the dispute within 20 days, the dispute will be elevated to FWS's Regional Director and DOE's Rocky Flats Manager or successor. Within 30 working days of receiving the Record of Dispute, they shall confer and attempt to resolve the

428

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

13 13 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 223 / Friday, November 19, 1999 / Notices numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 15. The EPA would like to solicit comments to: (i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (iv) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated electronic,

429

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

78 78 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 17, 2005 / Notices requirements and practices for institutions participating in the Title IV, Higher Education Act (HEA) programs. The public is alerted that this package is a request for an extension of a currently approved collection. Until the anticipated reauthorization of the Higher Education Act and any resulting changes to the implementing regulations, the existing paperwork collection is simply extended, rather than revised. Requests for copies of the proposed information collection request may be accessed from http://edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting the ''Browse Pending Collections'' link and by clicking on link number 2853. When you access the information collection, click on ''Download Attachments'' to view.

430

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

04 04 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 130 / Monday, July 8, 2002 / Notices Background The claim in question arose when the Department's Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education (Assistant Secretary) issued a program determination letter (PDL) on March 26, 1997. The PDL demanded a refund of $1,846,718 of funds provided to the PRDE for school years 1991-92 and 1992-93 under Chapter 1 of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 2701 et seq. (1988)). Specifically, the Assistant Secretary found that the PRDE had used Chapter 1 funds to assess the educational needs of all public and private school children in violation of statutory and regulatory requirements that permitted the use of those funds only for programs designed to meet the

431

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

90 90 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 173 / Thursday, September 5, 1996 / Notices written comments concerning (1) the scope of the EIS, (2) the issues the EIS should address, and (3) the alternatives the EIS should analyze. Please address written comments to Mr. Grainger at the address indicated above. These comments should be postmarked by November 1, 1996 to ensure full consideration. Organizations and individuals wishing to participate in the public meeting can call 1-800-242-8269 between 8:30 AM and 5:00 PM Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, or submit their requests to Mr. Grainger at the address indicated above. DOE requests that anyone who wishes to speak at the scoping meeting preregister by contacting Mr. Grainger, either by phone or in writing. Preregistration

432

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2266 2266 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 86 / Thursday, May 3, 2001 / Notices The States eligible to apply for incentive grant awards, and the amount they are eligible to receive are Florida, $2,645,125; Indiana, $1,308,726; Kentucky, $1,400,631; Texas, $3,000,000; Utah, $882,167; and Vermont $843,351. The six eligible States must submit their applications for incentive funding to the Department of Labor by June 18, 2001. As set forth in the provisions of WIA section 503(b)(2), and 20 CFR 666.220(b), the application must include assurances that: A. The legislature of the State was consulted with respect to the development of the application. B. The application was approved by the Governor, the eligible agency for adult education (as defined in section 203 of WIA), and the State agency

433

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

07 07 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2004 / Notices assessment; and (f) environmental statistics. Process and Deadline for Submitting Nominations Any interested person or organization may nominate individuals qualified in the areas of expertise described above to serve on the Subcommittee. Nominations should be submitted in electronic format through the Form for Nominating Individuals to Panels of the EPA Science Advisory Board provided on the SAB Web site, http:// www.epa.gov/sab. The form can be accessed through a link on the blue navigational bar on the SAB Web site, http://www.epa.gov/sab. To be considered, all nominations must include the information required on that form. Anyone who is unable to submit nominations using this form, and any

434

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 17 / Thursday, January 25, 1996 / Notices Department of Energy Organization Act (Public Law 95-91), and rules and regulations issued in implementation of those Acts. Further information regarding this Advisory Board may be obtained from Rachel Murphy Samuel at (202) 586- 3279. Issued in Washington, DC, on January 18, 1996. JoAnne Whitman, Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer. [FR Doc. 96-1197 Filed 1-24-96; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450-01-P Alternative Strategies for the Long- Term Management and Use of Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride AGENCY: Department of Energy ACTION: Notice of Intent (NOI). SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) announces its intent to prepare a programmatic environmental impact statement (PEIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act

435

Review of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project Construction Quality, November 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project Construction Quality May 2011 November 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background .......................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Scope .................................................................................................................................................... 1

436

Review of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project Construction Quality, November 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project Construction Quality May 2011 November 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background .......................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Scope .................................................................................................................................................... 1

437

Small Buildings Small Portfolio Commercial Upstream Incentive Project: Regional Roll-Out- 2014 BTO Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presenter: Todd Levin, Argonne National Laboratory To cost-effectively spur energy efficiency improvements in the small buildings and small portfolios (SBSP) sector, this project is evaluating how to expand commercial upstream incentive approaches to a level that will be nationally replicated.

438

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery. Progress review No. 89  

SciTech Connect

Summaries are presented for the DOE contracts related to supported research for thermal recovery of petroleum, geoscience technology, and field demonstrations in high-priority reservoir classes. Data included for each project are: title, contract number, principal investigator, research organization, beginning date, expected completion date, amount of award, objectives of the research, and summary of technical progress.

NONE

1998-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

439

Review of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project Construction Quality, March 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Site Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project Construction Quality May 2011 March 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background .......................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Scope .................................................................................................................................................... 1

440

The CTARA-Habitat Center water project Jal-Swarajya Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

.5 projects per village already done! lack of community ownership-poor O&M, poor recovery of water charges, water and sanitation. 10% towards capital costs and 100% of O&M. Govt. to shift from supply of service building Ground-water recharge and source strengthening Water Supply schemes School and sanitation link

Sohoni, Milind

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Federal Register Volume 64 Number 14; Friday, January 22, 1999  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

92 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 1999 / Notices 92 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 1999 / Notices parties on the scope of the reevaluation study and the alternatives, issues, and resources to be addressed in the DEIS. Comments and participation in this process are encouraged. An informal scoping workshop will be held on Monday, February 1, 1999, from 1 PM until 8 PM within the project area at the State of Illinois Building (Illinois Department of Transportation) located at 1100 Eastport Plaza Drive in Collinsville, Illinois (telephone 618- 346-3100). A notice of this meeting will be provided to interested parties and to the local news media. 7. Availability The Draft EIS is scheduled to be available for public review in late 1999. Dated: January 12, 1999. Thomas J. Hodgini,

442

Federal Register Volume 64 Number 14; Friday, January 22, 1999  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 1999 / Notices 2 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 1999 / Notices parties on the scope of the reevaluation study and the alternatives, issues, and resources to be addressed in the DEIS. Comments and participation in this process are encouraged. An informal scoping workshop will be held on Monday, February 1, 1999, from 1 PM until 8 PM within the project area at the State of Illinois Building (Illinois Department of Transportation) located at 1100 Eastport Plaza Drive in Collinsville, Illinois (telephone 618- 346-3100). A notice of this meeting will be provided to interested parties and to the local news media. 7. Availability The Draft EIS is scheduled to be available for public review in late 1999. Dated: January 12, 1999. Thomas J. Hodgini,

443

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Project Funding » Utility Energy Service Contracts » Federal Project Funding » Utility Energy Service Contracts » Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Federal Utility Partnership Working Group October 7, 2013 - 2:31pm Addthis The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) establishes partnerships and facilitates communications among Federal agencies, utilities, and energy service companies. The group develops strategies to implement cost-effective energy efficiency and water conservation projects through utility incentive programs at Federal sites. The mission and objectives of the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group are to: Enhance existing or foster new partnerships between Federal agencies and their servicing utilities to identify, develop, and implement cost-effective energy efficiency, water conservation, and renewable energy

444

REVIEWS:  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......Software Project Estimation Privacy Law Handbook Practical Software Project Estimation Privacy Law Handbook 28 Privacy Law Handbook Keith Mathieson (ed) Law Society...Microsoft's object model. Again the author does an excellent job of explaining some......

Microsoft Access 2010 VBA Macro Programming ? Practical Software Project Estimation ? Privacy Law Handbook

2011-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

445

EERE: Federal Energy Management Program Home Page  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

The U.S. Department of Energy's Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) works with key individuals to accomplish energy change within organizations, by bringing expertise from all levels of project and policy implementation, to enable Federal agencies to meet energy-related goals and to provide energy leadership to the country. The U.S. Department of Energy's Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) works with key individuals to accomplish energy change within organizations, by bringing expertise from all levels of project and policy implementation, to enable Federal agencies to meet energy-related goals and to provide energy leadership to the country. FEMP SERVICE AREAS Image of the capitol building. Laws, Regulations, & Reporting Meet Energy Goals and Regulatory Requirements Image of a building. Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Design, Operate, and Maintain High-Performance Buildings Image of a solar panel. Project Funding Funding and Contract Assistance for Energy Projects Image of a lightbulb. Procuring Energy-Efficient Products Specify and Purchase Efficient Products

446

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Federal Energy Management Program Technical Assistance Project 281 Solar Hot Water Application Assessment for U.S. Army IMCOM-Southeast Region  

SciTech Connect

The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 requires installations (EISA) to install solar systems of sufficient capacity to provide 30% of service hot water in new construction and renovations where cost-effective. However, installations are struggling with how to implement solar hot water, and while several installations are installing solar hot water on a limited basis, paybacks remain long. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) was tasked to address this issue to help determine how best to implement solar hot water projects. This documents discusses the results of that project.

Russo, Bryan J.; Chvala, William D.

2010-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

447

Proposed Rules Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

18954 18954 Vol. 76, No. 66 Wednesday, April 6, 2011 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 5 CFR Chapters XXIII and XXIV 10 CFR Chapters II, III, and X 18 CFR Chapter I 41 CFR Chapter 109 48 CFR Chapter 9 Reducing Regulatory Burden; Retrospective Review Under E.O. 13563 AGENCY: Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy. ACTION: Request for information; extension of public comment period. SUMMARY: On February 3, 2011, the Department of Energy (DOE) published a request for information (RFI) issued as part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ''Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review.'' This document announces that the period for submitting reply comments is extended to April 15, 2011. The February 3 document incorrectly published in the Notices section of the Federal Register.

448

Getting projects in gear  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......week for most projects - to review progress against the plan. Use a standard agenda. Document and agree...achievements. Ensure that review and quality assurance processes...of the high level project plan. Make sure that the project......

John Lawlor

2001-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

449

RL-721 REV4 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

51 Rev. l 51 Rev. l Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For CY 2013 Scheduled To Take Place Under CX 81.28, "Placing a Facility in an Environmentally Safe Condition" II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions ·e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Washington River Protection Solutions LLC (WRPS) will place facilities in a cold, dark, and environmentally safe condition during Calendar Year 2013. WRPS will perform all activities in accordance with the categorical exclusion (CX) limitations set forth in 10 CFR 1021, Appendices A & 8 to Subpart D, & CX 81.28. WRPS' facilities include all those identified in

450

RL-721 REV4 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

93 Rev 0 93 Rev 0 River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For CY 2013 Scheduled To Take Place Under CX B5.6, "Oil Spill Cleanup" II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Washington River Protection Solutions LLC (WRPS) will perform actions to remove and cleanup oil and related contaminated materials recovered during oil spill cleanup operations during Calendar Year 2013. WRPS will perform all activities in accordance with the categorical exclusion (CX) limitations set forth in 10 CFR 1021, Appendices A & B to Subpart D, & ex B5.6. WRPS' facilities include all those identified in the Tank Operations Contract

451

RL-721 REV4 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

38, Rev 1 38, Rev 1 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Electronic Equipment under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B1.7 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform acquisition, installation, operation, modification, and removal of electricity transmission control and monitoring devices, communication systems, data processing equipment, and similar electronic equipment. Activities include, but are not limited to, install fiber optic cable between and within existing buildings; install new conduit and/or replace old conduit; minor

452

RL-721 REV4 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, Rev 0 2, Rev 0 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Facility Safety and Environmental Improvements under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B2.5 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform safety and environmental improvements of a facility (including, but not limited to, replacement and upgrade of facility components) that do not result in a significant change in the expected useful life, design capacity, or function of the facility and during which operations may be suspended and then resumed. Improvements include, but are not limited to, replacement/

453

RL-721 REV3 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10 Number: 10 Number: DOE/CX-00051 Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For CY 2012 Scheduled To Take Place Onder CX B1.28, "Placing a Facility in an Environmentally Safe Condition" II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions - e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, etc.): Washington River Protection Solutions LLC (WRPS) will place facilities in a cold, dark, and environmentally safe condition on & near the Hanford Site during Calendar Year 2012. WRPS will perform all activities in accordance with the categorical exclusion (CX) limitations set forth in 10 CFR 1021, Appendices A & B to Subpart D, & CX B1.28. WRPS' facilities

454

RL-721 REV4 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

48 Rev. 1 48 Rev. 1 Washington River Protection Solutions LLC -Proposed Actions For CY 2013 Scheduled To Take Place Under CX B1.3, "Routine Maintenance" II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Washington River Protection Solutions LLC (WRPS) will perform routine maintenance services on buildings, structures, infrastructure and equipment during Calendar Year 2013. WRPS will perform all routine maintenance activities in accordance with the categorical exclusion (CX) limitations set forth in 10 CFR 1021, Appendices A & B to Subpart D, and CX B1.3. WRPS' facilities include all those identified in the Tank Operations Contract Sections J.13

455

RL-721 REV4 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3, Rev 0 3, Rev 0 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Site Characterization and Environmental Monitoring under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B3.1 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform site characterization and environmental monitoring (including siting, construction, modification, operation, dismantlement, and removal of equipment). Activities would be near-surface, shallow, and in previously disturbed or developed areas; designed to conform with applicable requirements and use best management practices to limit the effects of any resultant ground disturbance.

456

RL-721 REV4 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 Rev 0 7 Rev 0 Washington River Protection Solutions LLC Place Under CX 86.1, "Cleanup Actions" Proposed Actions For CY 2013 Scheduled To Take 11. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions- e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Washington River Protection Solutions LLC (WRPS) will perform small-scale, short-term cleanup actions, costing ten million or less, under the Resource Conservation & Recovery Act (RCRA), Atomic Energy Act, or other authorities as necessary to reduce risk to human health or the environment from a release or threat of release of a hazardous substance of than high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel during Calendar Year 2013. WRPS

457

RL-721 REV4 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

62 Rev. 1 62 Rev. 1 Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For CY 2013 Scheduled To Take Place Onder CX B5.1, "Actions to Conserve Energy or Water" 11. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions ·e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Washington River Protection Solutions LLC (WRPS) will perform actions to conserve energy or water during Calendar Year 2013. WRPS will perform all activities in accordance with the cal exclusion (CX) limitations set forth in 10 CFR 1021, Appendices A & B to Subpart D, & CX 85.1. WRPS' facilities include all those identified in the Tank Operations Contract Sections J.l3 and J.l4. Activities would include, but are not limited to:

458

RL-721 REV4 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

47, Rev 1 47, Rev 1 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Transfer Actions under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, Bl.30 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform transfer actions, where the predominant activity is transportation, and where the receipt and storage capacity and management capability for the amount and type of materials, equipment, or waste to be moved already exists at the receiving site; and all necessary facilities and operations at the receiving site are already permitted, licensed, or approved, as appropriate. Transfers may

459

RL-721 REV4 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

87 87 CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company - Site Characterization and Environmental Monitoring, December 2012 to December 2013 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions- e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): CH2MHill Plateau Remediation (PRC) will be conducting site characterization and environmental monitoring on the Han Site in accordance with the categorical exclusion (CX) referenced in 10 CFR 102 , Appendix B, CX 83.1, ''Site characterization and environmental monitoring''. PRC ects include all those identified Sections J.l3 and J.l4 of the PRC Contract, DE-AC06-0 RL14788. Site characterization and environmental monitoring (including, but not limited to, siting,

460

RL-721 REV4 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Renovation of 274-AW Under CX B2.l, "Workplace Enhancements" 11. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Washington River Protection Solutions LLC (WRPS) will renovate the 274-AW building. The 274-AW building is a 10-wide modular building located in the 200 East Area near the 241-AW and 241-AP Tank Farms. It was installed in 1993 by Eric R. Brown Construction, Inc. as a support facility for 272-AW. The facility currently serves as an office for WRPS' Base Operations managers and engineers. 274-AW is centrally located and easily accessible,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

RL-721 REV4 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

11, Rev 0 11, Rev 0 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Routine Maintenance and Custodial Services under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, Bl.3 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform routine maintenance and custodial services on Hanford buildings, structures, infrastructures, and equipment in previously disturbed and developed areas. Routine maintenance and custodial services include those in MSA contract DE-AC06-09RL14728, Attachment J.3. Buildings, structures, infrastructures, and equipment subject to routine maintenance and custodial services

462

Federal Assistance Reporting Checklist and Instructions for RD...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Federal Assistance Reporting Checklist and Instructions for RD&D Projects DOE F 4600.2, Financial Assistance Reporting Checklist for RD and D Attachment 1, Research...

463

Procuring Solar for Federal Facilities | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Implementation - implement the project, dependant on the financing selected. Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers provides an overview for...

464

Including Retro-Commissioning in Federal Energy Savings Performance...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

in Federal Energy Savings Performance Contracts Example Retro-Commissioning Statement of Work Introduction to Measurement & Verification for DOE Super ESPC Projects...

465

Notice of Open Meeting, Federal Register, 64 FR 44912, August...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Register, 64 FR 44912, August 18, 1999 Document displays the notice of open meeting for Measurement and Verification Guidelines for Federal Energy Projects, which was published...

466

BPA proposes rate increase to bolster federal power and transmission...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

BPA-proposes-rate-increase-to-bolster-federal-power-and-transmission-systems Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects...

467

Sustainability brings BPA highest award in Federal Electronics...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Sustainability-brings-BPA-highest-award-in-Federal-Electronics-Challenge Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects &...

468

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: Irvine Smart Grid Demonstration Project - Ardalan Kemiab, Southern California Edison  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Peer Review Meeting Peer Review Meeting Irvine Smart Grid Demonstration (ISGD) ( ) Ed Kamiab Southern California Edison (SCE) 6/8/2012 ISGD Objective SCE' I i S t G id D t ti (ISGD) ill (Insert graphic here) SCE's Irvine Smart Grid Demonstration (ISGD) will demonstrate an integrated, scalable Smart Grid system that includes many of the interlocking pieces of an end- to-end Smart Grid system, from the transmission and distrib tion s stems to cons mer applications s ch as distribution systems to consumer applications such as smart appliances and plug-in electric vehicles. Life-cycle Funding ($K) FY2010 FY2015 1. Energy Smart Customer Devices 2 Year 2020 Distribution System Technical Scope FY2010 - FY2015 $39,612 2. Year 2020 Distribution System 3. Interoperability & Cyber Security 4. Workforce of the Future

469

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Renewable Energy Renewable Energy Multiple laws and executive orders define requirements for the use of renewable energy in Federal facilities. The Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 2005: Defines "renewable energy" as electric energy generated from solar, wind, biomass, landfill gas, ocean (including tidal, wave, current, and thermal), geothermal, municipal solid waste, or new hydroelectric generation capacity achieved from increased efficiency or additions of new capacity at an existing hydroelectric project Requires the Secretary of Energy to ensure that, to the extent economically feasible and technically practicable, the following amounts of the total electricity consumed by the Federal government come from renewable energy: Not less than 3% in fiscal years 2007-2009

470

Exploring Ways to Standardize Federal Energy Contracts  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Exploring Ways to Standardize Exploring Ways to Standardize Federal Energy Contracts May 23, 2013 Chandra Shah for Tracy J. Logan Program Analyst Federal Energy Management Program Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy Energy Lawyers and Contracting Officers Working Group 2 Vision Evolution toward standardization of cross-sector and cross-project terms, conditions, reporting methodologies, financial calculations and contract structure to improve transparency and replicability of performance contracts. * Adoption of the Federal Uniform Performance Contract increases transparency and reduces transaction costs. * Technical and financial data and specifications are presented in a clear, predictable manner from contract to contract. * Federal Contracting Officers

471

Solar Federal Roadmapping Meeting | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Roadmap Development Pgower's picture Submitted by Pgower(45) Member 7 August, 2014 - 13:14 One-day workshop to review solar federal roadmaps with agency and industry...

472

FEDERAL INFORMATION PROCESSING STANDARD  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

March 2004 FEDERAL INFORMATION PROCESSING STANDARD (FIPS) 199, STANDARDS FOR SECURITY Information Technology Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology A new Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS), recently approved by the Secretary of Commerce, will help federal agencies

473

Federal Energy Management Program: Technologies  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Technologies Technologies The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) offers information about energy-efficient and renewable energy technologies through the following areas. Energy-Efficient Product Procurement: Find energy-efficient product requirements and technology, purchasing specifications, energy cost savings calculators, model contract language, and resources. Technology Deployment: Look up information about developing, measuring, and implementing new and underutilized technologies for energy management in the Federal Government. Renewable Energy: Read about renewable energy requirements, resources and technologies, project planning, purchasing renewable power, and more. See FEMP's other program areas. Contacts | Web Site Policies | U.S. Department of Energy | USA.gov

474

Project Impact Assessments: Building America FY14 Field Test Technical Support- 2014 BTO Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presenter: Lieko Earle, National Renewable Energy Laboratory The goal of this project is for the National Renewable Energy Laboratory to provide extensive, hands-on technical support to Building America teams in the areas of experiment design, provision of research-grade measurement hardware, energy modeling, and analysis. Building Americas field testsregularly conducted by both Building America teams and national laboratoriesdemonstrate the programs best house system innovations. The tests enable cost-effective evaluation of real-world performance and help ensure that all Building America field tests result in high-impact findings that push builders and homeowners to higher levels of savings.

475

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Basics Federal Requirements By Regulation

476

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on AddThis.com... Energy-Efficient Products Technology Deployment Renewable Energy Federal Requirements Renewable Resources & Technologies

477

Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Facility Energy Facility Energy Checklist to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on AddThis.com... Project Assistance Training Outreach Awards for Saving Energy Energy Action Month FAQs Facility Checklist Home Energy Checklist Office Checklist Energy Coordinators Commit to Efficiency Facility Energy Checklist This checklist outlines actions that conserve energy within facilities.

478

Federal Power Act | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Federal Power Act Federal Power Act Year 1920 Url [[File:|160px|link=http://www.fws.gov/laws/lawsdigest/FEDPOWR.HTML]] Description References Federal Power Act[1] The original Federal Power Act provides for cooperation between the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) and other Federal agencies, including resource agencies, in licensing and relicensing power projects. The President is required to appoint the five commissioners with the advice and consent of the Senate (16 U.S.C. 792). The President is also authorized, at the request of the Commission, to detail engineers from the Departments of Agriculture or Interior for field work (16 U.S.C. 793). "Navigable waters" (for which the Commission has jurisdiction under the Commerce Clause) are defined to include "streams or other bodies of water

479

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

35245 35245 Vol. 77, No. 114 Wednesday, June 13, 2012 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Rural Utilities Service 7 CFR Part 1700 RIN 0572-AC23 Substantially Underserved Trust Areas (SUTA) AGENCY: Rural Utilities Service, USDA. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Rural Utilities Service (RUS) is issuing regulations related to loans and grants to finance the construction, acquisition, or improvement of infrastructure projects in Substantially Underserved Trust Areas (SUTA). The intent is to implement Section 306F of the Rural Electrification Act by providing the process by which eligible applicants may apply for funding by the agency. DATES: Effective: July 13, 2012. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michele Brooks, Director, Program Development and Regulatory Analysis,

480

Chapter 29 - Portfolio and Project Planning and Management in the Drug Discovery, Evaluation, Development, and Regulatory Review Process  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Drug discovery, evaluation, development, and regulatory review are complex, lengthy, and costly processes that involve in excess of 10,000 interdependent activities. In order to be successful in biopharmaceutical new product development, one needs a set of general principles that provide guidance in the construction of a Research and Development (R&D) Portfolio, the construction of individual Product Development Plans, and the subsequent updates required to keep the portfolio and product development plans current as learning occurs. The following five Principles of Optimal Product Development form the basis for defining a decision-based operational model, identifying and quantifying the critical information required at each major decision-point, projecting the probabilities of various outcomes, and informing key stakeholders (management, board, and investors) with the clear and concise status information that is needed for effective product development governance.

Charles Grudzinskas; Charles T. Gombar

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal project review" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

IT Project Management Certification | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

and research project management certification initiatives and services provided by NASA, USDA, DOJ, HUD, GSA (STAR program), OPM, Federal CIO Council, Project Management...

482

Project Transition/Closeout (CD-4)  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This Guide is written for the federal project director ensuring that processes progress smoothly and that projects meet asset management goals and financial closure requirements of DOE.

2008-09-24T23:59:59.000Z

483

Financing Mechanisms for Renewable Energy Projects | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Projects Financing Mechanisms for Renewable Energy Projects On December 5, 2013, the White House released Federal Leadership on Energy Management, a presidential memorandum...

484

Presidential DocumentsFederal Register Vol. 59, No. 32  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Presidential DocumentsFederal Register Vol. 59, No. 32 Wednesday, February 16, 1994 Title 3-- The President Executive Order 12898 of February 11, 1994 Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice, and consistent with the principles set forth in the report on the National Performance Review, each Federal

485

Independent Oversight Review, Plutonium Finishing Plant- July 2014  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Targeted Review of the Safety Significant Confinement Ventilation System and Review of Federal Assurance Capability at the Plutonium Finishing Plant

486

Federal Energy Management Program: Renewable Energy Working Group  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Working Group Working Group The Renewable Energy Working Group provides a forum for Federal agencies and the renewable energy industry to exchange information on existing and planned projects, lessons learned, sources of project funds, and technologies. Guidance The Renewable Energy Working Group is charged with providing guidance about renewable energy regulatory requirements. Federal Renewable Energy Requirement Guidance Under EPAct 2005 and Executive Order 13423 Transmittal Letter Summarizing the Federal Renewable Energy Requirement Guidance Members Led by the Federal Energy Management Program, the Renewable Energy Working Group is made up of more than 100 Federal agency representatives, U.S. Department of Energy programs, and the renewable energy industry. Meetings

487

Federal Energy Management Program: Publications  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Advanced Search Browse by Topic Mail Requests Help Software FAQs Feature featured product thumbnail Federal Energy Management Program Overview - Facilitating Sound, Cost-Effective Energy Management Details Bookmark & Share View Related Welcome to the Federal Energy Management Program's (FEMP) publication and product library. Use this database to: Search for FEMP publications and products View or download publications Request hard copies of select publications and products. Search the Library Search (Searches Title, Description, Filename and Keywords) Advanced Search Browse by Topic Most Popular Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC) ENABLE Program The Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC) ENABLE program, a new project funding approach, allows small Federal facilities to realize energy and water savings in six months or less. ESPC ENABLE pr Details Bookmark & Share

488

Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......of organizing computations (though he does not discuss the product form of the inverse...theory. It reads with the drynesa of a handbook. This does not detract from Reviews 479 ita value; as a handbook it is excellent and the reviewer has no......

J. G. SAW

1961-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

489

Joint NEA-IAEA International Peer Review of the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project's Total System Performance Assessment Supporting the Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEA-IAEA International Peer Review of the NEA-IAEA International Peer Review of the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project's Total System Performance Assessment Supporting the Site Recommendation Process Final Report December 2001 This document is not an official copy and is for informational purposes only. CONTENTS Summary Objectives International perspective Recommendations for future assessments 1 Introduction 1.1 Background to the Yucca Mountain Project 1.2 Terms of reference, objectives and scope of the review 1.3 Conduct of the review 1.4 Organisation of this report 2 General Considerations 2.1 Regulatory perspective 2.2 Performance assessment rationale 2.3 General approach to performance assessment 2.4 Documentation 3 Sub-system methodology 3.1 Repository design

490

Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Major  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Major Renovations to someone by E-mail Major Renovations to someone by E-mail Share Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Major Renovations on Facebook Tweet about Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Major Renovations on Twitter Bookmark Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Major Renovations on Google Bookmark Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Major Renovations on Delicious Rank Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Major Renovations on Digg Find More places to share Guide to Integrating Renewable Energy in Federal Construction: Major Renovations on AddThis.com... Home Introduction Assessing Renewable Energy Options Planning, Programming, & Budgeting Project Funding

491

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Facility Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on AddThis.com... Requirements by Subject

492

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products September 2011 Update to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products September 2011 Update on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products September 2011 Update on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products September 2011 Update on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products September 2011 Update on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products September 2011 Update on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal

493

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products November 2011 Update to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products November 2011 Update on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products November 2011 Update on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products November 2011 Update on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products November 2011 Update on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products November 2011 Update on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal

494

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products February 2012 Update to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products February 2012 Update on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products February 2012 Update on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products February 2012 Update on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products February 2012 Update on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products February 2012 Update on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal

495

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal

496

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Operations & Maintenance Greenhouse Gases Water Efficiency Basics

497

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Utility Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners on AddThis.com...

498

Federal Laboratory Technology Transfer  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Federal Laboratory Technology Transfer Fiscal Year 2007 Prepared by: National Institute to present to the President and the Congress this Federal Laboratory Technology Transfer Report summarizing the achievements of Federal technology transfer and partnering programs of the Federal research and development

Perkins, Richard A.

499

Federal Aviation Administration  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

transportation systems FAA's RDT&E Organization: Federal Laboratory for R&D of aviation systems IndependentFederal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation AdministrationNextGen: Primer, Challenges. Wilson N. Felder Director, FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center Date: 6 February 2012 #12;2Federal

500

Federal Resume Guide  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This Learning Module will offer helpful tips and suggestions on the development of a federal resume.