Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment This manual...

2

Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

44-NO. 62 44-NO. 62 3-29-79 PAGES 18633-18921 E THURSDAY, MARCH 29, 1979 € 18722 NOTICES [ 31 25-01-MI COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 'ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ABROAD OF MAJOR FEDERAL ACTIONS Executive Order 12144; Implementing and Explanotory Documents MARCH 21, 1979. AGENCY: Council on Environmental Quality, Executive Office of t h e F'resi- dent. ACTION: Information Only: Publica- tion of Implementing Documents Con- cerning Executive Order 12114. SUMMARY: O n January 4, 1979, t h e President signed Executive Order 12114, Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions (44 FR 1957 (Jan. 9, 1979)). The Council has re- ceived numerous requests for t h e im- plementing and explanatory docu- ments. I n order efficiently to respond to such public requests. t

3

Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions On January 4, 1979, President Carter signed Executive Order 12114, entitled Environmental Effects of Major Federal Actions. The purpose of this Council on Environmental Quality memorandum is to initiate the consultation process required by this Executive Order. 44 Fed Reg 18633: Council on Environmental Quality: Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions More Documents & Publications Implementation of Executive Order 12114 Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions: Final Guideline EO 12114: Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions Unified Procedures Applicable to Major Federal Actions Relating to Nuclear Activities Subject to Executive Order 12114 (State Department, 44 Fed Reg

4

Federal Energy Management Program: Develop an Institutional Change Action  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Develop an Develop an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Develop an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Develop an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Develop an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Develop an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Develop an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Develop an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability on AddThis.com...

5

Unified Procedures Applicable to Major Federal Actions Relating...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Unified Procedures Applicable to Major Federal Actions Relating to Nuclear Activities Subject to Executive Order 12114 (State Department, 44 Fed Reg 65560) Unified Procedures...

6

Unified Procedures Applicable to Major Federal Actions Relating to Nuclear  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Unified Procedures Applicable to Major Federal Actions Relating to Unified Procedures Applicable to Major Federal Actions Relating to Nuclear Activities Subject to Executive Order 12114 (State Department, 44 Fed Reg 65560) Unified Procedures Applicable to Major Federal Actions Relating to Nuclear Activities Subject to Executive Order 12114 (State Department, 44 Fed Reg 65560) The following unified procedures issued by the State Department are established to satisfy the requirement of the Executive Order for implementing procedures concerning nuclear export activities of Federal agencies. 44 Fed Reg 65560: Department of State: Unified Procedures Applicable to Major Federal Actions Relating to Nuclear Activities Subject to Executive Order 12114 More Documents & Publications Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions

7

EO 12114: Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EO 12114: Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions EO 12114: Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions EO 12114: Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions The purpose of this Executive Order is to enable responsible officials of Federal Agencies having ultimate responsibility for authorizing and approving actions encompassed by this Order to be informed of pertinent environmental considerations and to take such considerations into account, with other pertinent considerations of national policy, in making decisions regarding such actions EO 12114: Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions More Documents & Publications EIS-0386: Notice of Intent to Prepare a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, Amend Relevant Agency Land Use Plans, and Conduct Public Scoping

8

Chronological History of Federal Fleet Actions and Mandates (Brochure)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This chronological history of Federal fleet actions and mandates provides a year-by-year timeline of the acts, amendments, executive orders, and other regulations that affect Federal fleets. The fleet actions and mandates included in the timeline span from 1988 to 2009.

Not Available

2011-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

9

Procedures Applicable to Major Federal Actions ... Subject to EO 12114  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 13, 1979 Part 111 Department of State - Office of the Secretary ~ Unified Procedures Applicable to Major Federal Actions Relating to Nuclear Activities Subject to Executive Order 121 14 65560 Federal Register I Vol. 44, No, 220 / T u e s d a y , N o v e m b e r 13, 1979 / Notices DEPARTMENTOFSTATE [Public Notice 6901 Unified Procedures Applicable to Major Federal Actions Relating to Nuclear Activities Subject to Executive Order 12114 . Executive Order 12114. "En\ ironmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions." was signed by the President on Jan-ary 4, 19i9. The Order represents the excl;sive and complete determination by the L'nited States Governmen! of the procedural and other actions to be taken by Federal agencies to further the purposes of the National

10

Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2898: Federal Actions to Address Environmental 2898: Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (1994) Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (1994) Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (1994). Directs each federal agency to make environmental justice part of its mission, and sets responsibilities for agencies including developing a strategy to identify and address "disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of its programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income populations." This applies equally to Native American programs. This EO also directs "after consultation with tribal

11

EA-1950: Finding of No Significant Impact and Mitigation Action...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

EA-1950: Finding of No Significant Impact and Mitigation Action Plan Grand Coulee-Creston Transmission Line Rebuild; Grant and Lincoln Counties, Washington Bonneville Power...

12

EO 12114: Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

114-Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions 114-Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions SOURCE: The provisions of Executive Order 12114 of January 4, 1979, appear at 44 FR 1957, 3 CFR, 1979, Comp., p. 356, unless otherwise noted. By virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, and as President of the United States, in order to further environmental objectives consistent with the foreign policy and national security policy of the United States, it is ordered as follows: Section 1. 1-1. Purpose and Scope. The purpose of this Executive Order is to enable responsible officials of Federal Agencies having ultimate responsibility for authorizing and approving actions encompassed by this Order to be informed of pertinent environmental considerations and to take

13

Federal Energy Management Program: Develop an Institutional Change Action  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Develop an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability Develop an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability Graphic showing 5 gears. They progress from Determine Goal to Identify Context-Rules, Roles and Tools to Develop Action Plan to Implement Plan to Measure and Evaluate. Institutional Change Continuous Improvement Cycle After establishing a goal and assessing the rules, roles, and tools, Federal agencies can develop an action plan (select the strategies that will be implemented over time to achieve and maintain energy and sustainability goals). This action plan should target specific audiences with tailored strategies and take into account the need to review and revise strategies in the long-term. The action plan must include appropriate metrics and regular measurement. Remember that planning useful efficiency and sustainability evaluation is necessary before an organization begins to implement an action plan.

14

Finding of No Significant Impact, Federal Register, 73 FR 2017, January 11, 2008  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Document details the finding of no significant impact of the Energy-Efficient Performance Requirements for New Federal Commercial and Residential Buildings, which was published in the Federal Register on January 11, 2008.

15

Enforcement actions: Significant actions resolved; Quarterly progress report, October--December 1993: Volume 12, No. 4  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This compilation summarizes significant enforcement actions that have been resolved during one quarterly period (October - December 1993) and includes copies of letters, Notices, and Orders sent by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to licensees with respect to these enforcement actions. It is anticipated that the information in this publication will be widely disseminated to managers and employees engaged in activities licensed by the NRC, so that actions can be taken to improve safety by avoiding future violations similar to those described in this publication.

NONE

1994-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

16

2009 Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) Corrective Action Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

O. Box 5400 O. Box 5400 Albuquerque, NM 87185 The Honorable A.I. Eggenberger Chairman, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 625 Indiana Avenue NW, Suite 700 Washington D.C. 20004-2901 Dear Mr. Chairman: MAR 1 9 2009 Enclosed is the Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) Corrective Action Plan, Revision 2, which is Deliverable B for Commitment 13 in the Department of Energy (DOE) Implementation Plan to Improve Oversight of Nuclear Operations, issued in response to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004-1. This plan has been updated to identify that all Department corrective actions to improve recruiting, developing, training, qualifying, maintaining proficiency of, and retaining technical personnel to safely accomplish DOE's mission have been completed. This revised

17

2007 Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) Corrective Action Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7,2007 7,2007 The Honorable A. J. Eggenberger Chairman, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 625 Indiana Avenue NW, Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20004-290 1 Dear Mr. Chairman: Enclosed is Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) Corrective Action Plan, Revision 1, which is Deliverable B for Commitment 13 in the Department of Energy (DOE) Implementation Plan to Improve Oversight of Nuclear Operations, Revision 2, issued in response to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004- 1. This plan has been updated to identify the completed and remaining Department corrective actions to improve recruiting, developing, training, qualifying, maintaining proficiency of, and retaining technical personnel to safely accomplish DOE'S mission. The plan is approved and issued for implementation, effective

18

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This manual establishes polices and procedures for carrying out the EPA's responsibilities to review and comment on Federal actions affecting the quality of the environment. 

19

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This manual establishes policies and procedures for carrying out the Environmental Protection Agency's responsibilities to review and comment on Federal actions affecting the quality of the environment.

20

Federal-Tribal Partnership on Climate Change Action Rounds Corner, Shifts  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal-Tribal Partnership on Climate Change Action Rounds Corner, Federal-Tribal Partnership on Climate Change Action Rounds Corner, Shifts Into High Gear at 2013 Tribal Nations Conference Federal-Tribal Partnership on Climate Change Action Rounds Corner, Shifts Into High Gear at 2013 Tribal Nations Conference November 19, 2013 - 5:12pm Addthis Federal-Tribal Partnership on Climate Change Action Rounds Corner, Shifts Into High Gear at 2013 Tribal Nations Conference David Conrad David Conrad Director, Tribal and Intergovernmental Affairs The 2013 White House Tribal Nations Conference, held Wednesday, November 13 at the Department of the Interior, was a turning point in the federal-tribal partnership to combat climate change and strengthen community resilience. Secretary Moniz spoke of the importance of the relationship between the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

and Procedures for the Review of Federal and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment October 3, 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 - PURPOSE, POLICY, AND MANDATES 1. Purpose 2. Statutory Authorities 3. Policy CHAPTER 2 - MANAGEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS 1. General Responsibilities 2. Office of Federal Activities ❍ A. Federal Agency Liaisons ❍ B. Management Information Unit 3. Regional Office 4. Program Offices 5. Specific Review Management Responsibilities ❍ A. Headquarters and Regional Environmental Review Coordinators ❍ B. Principal Reviewer ❍ C. Associate Reviewer ❍ D. Consolidation of Comments 6. Routing and Lead Responsibility of EIS's and Other Federal Actions CHAPTER 3 - PRE-EIS REVIEW ACTIVITIES 1. Policy 2. General Liaison

22

E-Print Network 3.0 - actions significant actions Sample Search...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

should begin work on its Action Team Plan. ... Source: Environmental Protection Agency, Technology Innovation Program (TIP) Collection: Multidisciplinary Databases and Resources...

23

Chronological History of Federal Energy-Efficient Product Procurement: Executive, Legislative and Regulatory Requirements, Actions and Mandates  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Document provides a chronological history of the legislative actions and executive orders that contribute to the current requirements for Federal energy-efficient product procurement.

24

Enforcement actions: Significant actions resolved, material licensees. Semiannual progress report, July--December 1997; Volume 16, Number 2, Part 3  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This compilation summarizes significant enforcement actions that have been resolved during the period (July--December 1997) and includes copies of letters, Notices, and Orders sent by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to material licensees with respect to these enforcement actions. It is anticipated that the information in this publication will be widely disseminated to managers and employees engaged in activities licensed by the NRC, so that actions can be taken to improve safety by avoiding future violations similar to those described in this publication.

NONE

1998-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

25

Enforcement actions: Significant actions resolved reactor licensees. Volume 14, No. 2, Part 2, Quarterly progress report, April--June 1995  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This compilation summarizes significant enforcement actions that have been resolved during one quarterly period (April--June 1995) and includes copies of letters, Notices, and Orders sent by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to reactor licensees with respect to these enforcement actions. It is anticipated that the information in this publication will be widely disseminated to managers and employees engaged in activities licensed by the NRC, so that actions can be taken to improve safety by avoiding future violations similar to those described in this publication.

NONE

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

26

FINDING OF MD SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FORMERLY UTILIZED HED/AEC SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM:  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

FINDING OF MD SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FINDING OF MD SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FORMERLY UTILIZED HED/AEC SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM: BAY0 CANYONS, NEW MEXICO Under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP), the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has proposed to carry out rcmedfrl action at a site located in Bayo Canyon, Los Alamos County, New Mexico. Although the site as partially decontaminated and decommissioned in the 196Os, there remain above-background amounts of radionuclides. DOE has determined that strontium-90 in excess of DDE's proposed remedial- action criterir exists in subsurface materials underlying an area of about 0.6 ha (1.5 acres) at the Bayo Canyon site. The proposed action is to demarcate this are8 and restrict its use to activities that will not disturb this sub-

27

MONTICELLO NPL SITES Minutes and Action Items of the Federal Facilities Agreement Meeting  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Minutes and Action Items of the Federal Facilities Agreement Meeting Minutes and Action Items of the Federal Facilities Agreement Meeting September 16 and 17,2008 Meeting Location U.S. Department of Energy Site Office, Monticello, Utah Meeting Attendees Jalena Dayvault- U.S. Department of Energy Tim Bartlett- S.M. Stoller Todd Moon- S.M. Stoller Linda Sheader- S. M. Stoller Paul Wetherstein- S.M. Stoller Brent Everett- Utah Department of Environmental Quality Duane Mortensen- Utah Department of Environmental Quality Paul Mushovic- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Rob Stites- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (participated by phone) Christina Wilson- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (participated by phone) Meeting topics and discussion points are summarized under the headings listed below. The agenda and copies of handouts presented during the meeting are attached to this report.

28

EA-0893: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Gazes Cardiac Institute, and the connected action involving the Strom Thurmond Biomedical Research Center, does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting...

29

Implementation of Executive Order 12114 - Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions (46 FR 1007, January 5, 1981)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Register / Vol. 46, No. 2 / Monday, J Federal Register / Vol. 46, No. 2 / Monday, J a n u a r y 5, 1981 / Notices 1007 _ - - DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Implementation of Executive Order 121 14 Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions; Final Guideline AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Final guideline for implementation of Executive Order 12114. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy [the Department) hereby adopts final Departmental guidelines implementing - Ewcuti\ e Order 12114--En\ ironmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Artions. which was issued on Janu,lry 4. 1979. The guidelines published herein reflect certain re\ isions to the proposed guide!ines, published in the Federal Register on September 6,1979 (44 FR 521461, based upon the Department's consideration of comments received and

30

Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). Therefore, the preparation...

31

DOE/EA-1471: Environmental Assessment for the Transportation of Highly Enriched Uranium from the Russian Federation to the Y-12 National Security Complex and Finding of No Significant Impact (January 2004)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EA for the Transportation of Highly Enriched Uranium from the Russian Federation to the Y-12 National Security Complex EA for the Transportation of Highly Enriched Uranium from the Russian Federation to the Y-12 National Security Complex i FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF HIGHLY ENRICHED URANIUM FROM THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION TO THE Y-12 NATIONAL SECURITY COMPLEX ISSUED BY: United States Department of Energy ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact SUMMARY: The United States (U.S.) Department of Energy (DOE) proposes to transport highly enriched uranium (HEU) from Russia to a secure storage facility in Oak Ridge, TN. This proposed action would allow the United States and Russia to accelerate the disposition of excess nuclear weapons materials in the interest of promoting nuclear disarmament, strengthening nonproliferation, and combating terrorism. The HEU

32

Monticello NPL Sites Federal Facilities Agreement Meeting Minutes & Action Items  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

NPL Sites NPL Sites Federal Facilities Agreement Meeting Minutes & Action Items Location Monticello, Utah- DOE Office of Legacy Management field office Date September 27,2006 Attendees David Bird- Utah Department of Environmental Quality Paul Mushovic- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Att Kleinrath- U.S. Depmtment of Energy Tim Bartlett- S. M. Stoller Meeting topics and discussion points are summarized separately under the headings that follow. Attaclunent 1 to this report includes the agenda and handout materials provided at the meeting. This report also includes disposal cell and Pond 4 leachate collection data (Attachment 2), quarterly site inspection results (Attachment 3), and project schedule and deliverables through the next two qumters (October 2006 through March 2007). With this

33

EA-0995: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed construction of the Drum Storage Facility at Rocky Flats does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality...

34

Enforcement actions: Significant actions resolved, reactor licensees. Semiannual progress report, July--December 1995. Volume 14, Numbers 3 and 4, Part 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This compilation summarizes significant enforcement actions that have been resolved during the period (July--December 1995) and includes copies of letters, Notices, and Orders sent by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to reactor licensees with respect to these enforcement actions. It is anticipated that the information in this publication will be widely disseminated to managers and employees engaged in activities licensed by the NRC, so that actions can be taken to improve safety by avoiding future violations similar to those described in this publication.

NONE

1996-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

35

Enforcement actions: Significant actions resolved material licensees (non-medical). Volume 14, No. 1, Part 3, Quarterly progress report, January--March 1995  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This compilation summarizes significant enforcement actions that have been resolved during one quarterly period (January--March 1995) and includes copies of letters, Notices, and Orders sent by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to Material Licensees (non-Medical) with respect to these enforcement actions. It is anticipated that the information in this publication will be widely disseminated to managers and employees engaged in activities licensed by the NRC, so that actions can be taken to improve safety by avoiding future violations similar to those described in this publication.

NONE

1995-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

36

Enforcement actions: Significant actions resolved, material licensees. Semiannual progress report, July--December 1995: Volume 14, Numbers 3 and 4, Part 3  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This compilation summarizes significant enforcement actions that have been resolved during the period (July--December 1995) and includes copies of letters, Notices, and Orders sent by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to material licensees with respect to these enforcement actions. It is anticipated that the information in this publication will be widely disseminated to managers and employees engaged in activities licensed by the NRC, so that actions can be taken to improve safety by avoiding future violations similar to those described in this publication.

NONE

1996-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

37

Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (1994)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Documents Documents Federal Register Vol. 59, No. 32 Wednesday, February 16, 1994 Title 3- The President Executive Order 12898 of February 11, 1994 Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1-1.Implementation. 1-101. Agency Responsibilities. To the greatest extent practicable and per- mitted by law, and consistent with the principles set forth in the report on the National Performance Review, each Federal agency shall make achiev- ing environmental justice part of its mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environ-

38

Dosimetric Significance of the ICRP's Updated Guidance and Models, 1989-2003, and Implications for U.S. Federal Guidance  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Over the past two decades the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a series of Federal guidance documents for the purpose of providing the Federal and State agencies with technical information to assist their implementation of radiation protection programs. Currently recommended dose conversion factors, annual limits on intake, and derived air concentrations for intake of radionuclides are tabulated in Federal Guidance Report No. 11 (FGR 11), published in 1988. The tabulations in FGR 11 were based on dosimetric quantities and biokinetic and dosimetric models of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) developed for application to occupational exposures. Since the publication of FGR 11 the ICRP has revised some of its dosimetric quantities and its models for workers and has also developed age-specific models and dose conversion factors for intake of radionuclides by members of the public. This report examines the extent of the changes in the inhalation and ingestion dose coefficients of FGR 11 implied by the updated recommendations of the ICRP, both for workers and members of the public.

Leggett, R.W.

2003-09-10T23:59:59.000Z

39

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

30 30 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 214 / Friday, November 5, 1999 / Notices natural or human environment. Because no significant environmental impacts will result from implementation of the proposed action, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required and will not be prepared. The Army will not initiate the proposed action for 15 days following the completion of the EA and FNSI and publication of a public notice in a local newspaper. This EA is available for review at the following repositories: Lassen Community College Library, Highway 139, P.O. Box 3000, Susanville, CA 96130; Lassen County Public Works, 707 Nevada Street, Suite 2, Susanville, CA 96130; and the Washoe County Library, Downtown Branch, 301 South Center Street, Reno NV 89501. Dated: November 1, 1999.

40

Independent Oversight Targeted Review of the Safety Significant Blast Door and Personnel Door Interlock Systems and Review of Federal Assurance Capability at the Pantex Plant, December 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Targeted Review of the Targeted Review of the Safety Significant Blast Door and Personnel Door Interlock Systems and Review of Federal Assurance Capability at the Pantex Plant December 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Scope.................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background........................................................................................................................................... 2

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Reform in three phases: Judicial action and the German federal framework law for higher education of 1976  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Higher educational reforms undertaken in the Federal Republic between 1965 and 1979 bear witness to a growing proclivity among German citizens to engage in “politicized legalism”. Three verdicts issued by the Bun...

Joyce Marie Mushaben

1984-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

42

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Wibursement of $65 Million by the U . S . Department of Energy to the State of T e x a s for Construction of a Regional Medical Technology Center at the Former Superconducting Super Collider Site, Waxahachie, Texas AGENCY: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ACTION FXNDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has completed an environmental assessment @OE/EA-1090) of the proposed disbursement of $65 million to the State of Texas for construction of a Regional Medical Technology Center (RMTC) near Waxahachie, Texas. Based on the results of the analysis reported in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment

43

Finding of No Significant Impact; Energy Efficient Performance Requirements for New Federal Commercial and Residential Buildings (DOE/EA-1463) (1/11/08)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 Federal Register 7 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 8 / Friday, January 11, 2008 / Notices Energy; and provide comments and recommendations and priorities for the Department of Energy Annual Plan requirements of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Subtitle J, Section 999. Tentative Agenda: 7:30 a.m.-8 a.m. Registration 8 a.m.-12 p.m. Welcome & Introductions, Opening Remarks by the Designated Federal Officer, Update Status of the 2007 Program, Overview of 2008 Annual Plan Draft, and Overview of the National Energy Technology Laboratory Complementary Research Program. 12 p.m.-1 p.m. Lunch. 1 p.m.-4 p.m. Committee Discussions. 4 p.m.-4:30 p.m. New Business: Plans for 2008-2010 Federal Advisory Committee. 4:30 p.m.-5 p.m. Public Comments. 5 p.m. Adjourn. Public Participation: The meeting is

44

EA-1290: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

90: Finding of No Significant Impact 90: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1290: Finding of No Significant Impact Disposition of Russian Federation Titled Natural Uranium The Proposed Action to submit an export license to the NRC and then ship up to 9,000 metric tons per year of natural uranium as UF6 (Russian Federation-titled) by truck from the Portsmouth and Paducah gaseous diffusion plants to either Hampton Roads, VA or the port of Batlitnmore, MD and thence by ocean-going freighter to St. Petersburg, Russia, and to continue these shipments for up to 15 years, entails insignificant impacts and low risks. The action does not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act. Therefore, based upon

45

Federal / State Legislative & Regulatory Changes Required for...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Issues Federal and State Blending Restrictions Action by ASTM NCWM to address higher ethanol blends Federal State Legislative & Regulatory Changes Required for Introduction of...

46

PV opportunities in the Federal sector  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The Federal government is the largest user of energy in the United States today. The Department of Defense (DOD) uses more than 80% of that energy; the Department of Energy is the second largest user. In the 15 years from 1975 to 1989 $128 billion was spent for Federal energy activities. In 1989 alone the Federal government spent a total of $8.7 billion on energy of which $3.5 billion was for buildings and $2.4 billion was for electricity. The Federal government which owns or leases 500 000 buildings provided an additional $3.9 billion on energy assistance for low?income housing in 1989 (1). Executive Order 12902 (Energy Efficiency and Water Conservation at Federal Facilities) of March 8 1994 implements and expands the Federal energy management provisions stated in the Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 1992. The goal is to reduce energy use in Federal buildings to 30% of the 1985 levels by the year 2005. The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) has been assigned the responsibility of implementing Executive Order 12902. Subsequently DOE FEMP other Federal agencies and private industry have formed a unique partnership to develop a process and set of actions that will stimulate new opportunities for renewable energy technologies. If these Federal initiatives are successful substantial investment in renewable and energy efficiency technologies will be stimulated an important portion of the nation’s energy needs will be supplied and a significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions will be achieved.

John P. Thornton

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

47

EA-1871: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1871: Finding of No Significant Impact Energy Efficiency Design Standards for New Federal Commercial and Multi-Family High-Rise Residential Buildings and New Federal Low-Rise Residential Buildings Based on an DOE/EA-1871, DOE has determined that revising the Federal building energy efficiency standards to ASHRAE 90.1-2007 and IECC 2009 would not be a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA. Therefore, an EIS is not required, and DOE is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact. EA-1871-FONSI-2011.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1871: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1872: Draft Environmental Assessment EA-1918: Finding of No Significant Impact

48

EA-1338: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

38: Finding of No Significant Impact 38: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1338: Finding of No Significant Impact Transfer of the Department of Energy Grand Junction Office to Non-DOE Ownership On the basis of the Environmental Assessment (EA), which analyzes the relevant environmental issues and the concerns of stakeholders, DOE finds that no significant impact would result from implementing the proposed action to transfer the facility to non-DOE ownership, or from the no action alternative. This Finding of No Significant Impact is pursuant to the NEPA of 1969, the CEQ's Regulations for Implementing NEPA, and the DOE NEPA Implementing Procedures. The proposed action does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the environment within the mandate of NEPA. Therefore, implementation of the proposed action does not

49

EA-1871: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EA-1871: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1871: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1871: Finding of No Significant Impact Energy Efficiency Design Standards for New Federal Commercial and Multi-Family High-Rise Residential Buildings and New Federal Low-Rise Residential Buildings Based on an DOE/EA-1871, DOE has determined that revising the Federal building energy efficiency standards to ASHRAE 90.1-2007 and IECC 2009 would not be a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA. Therefore, an EIS is not required, and DOE is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact. EA-1871-FONSI-2011.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1871: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1918: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1778: Draft Environmental Assessment

50

EA-1884: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4: Finding of No Significant Impact 4: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1884: Finding of No Significant Impact Invenergy Interconnection for the Wray Wind Energy Project, Town of Wray, Yuma County, CO Based on the information contained in the EA, Western's Federal Action would not result in significant environmental impacts. Western has determined that its action to execute an interconnection agreement to connect the proposed Project to Western's Wray Substation and to take possession of a new switchyard, and either a 4.2-or-0.75-mile double-circuit 115-kV connector line depending on the location of the new switchyard, as well as new interconnection equipment in the existing Wray Substation does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA.

51

EA-0507: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EA-0507: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-0507: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-0507: Finding of No Significant Impact Federal Aviation Agency Explosive Detection System Independent Validation and Verification Program Idaho National Engineering Laboratory The proposed action to independently test explosive detection systems for the FAA at the INEL does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA. This finding is based on the analysis in the environmental assessment. Therefore, the preparation of an environmental impact statement is not required for this proposed action. EA-0507-FONSI-1991.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-0507: Final Environmental Assessment EA-0822: Finding of No Significant Impact

52

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

09 09 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 93 / Friday, May 14, 1999 / Notices technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 3.03 hours per response. It is estimated that any individual may respond to synopses or market research questions 5 times per year. EPA anticipates publicizing approximately 260 contract actions per year, and conducting 3790 market research inquiries. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review

53

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

25 25 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 224 / Thursday, November 20, 1997 / Notices implementation from 8:30 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. For the rest of the day, the Council will meet with representatives from the State School-to-Work Implementation Grantees in small groups to discuss and determine strategies for addressing State sustainability issues. The meeting will close with a summary of the day's meeting and a discussion of future actions. Public Participation: The meeting on Tuesday, December 2, 1997, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. at the Renaissance Mayflower Hotel, will be open to the public. Seats will be reserved for the media. Individuals with disabilities in need of special accommodations should contact the Designated Federal Official (DFO), listed below, at least seven (7)

54

Energy Action Month | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

and water that can help you meet critical agency mission goals, see Federal Energy and Water Management Awards to read about model Federal projects. During Energy Action Month...

55

EA-1157: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

157: Finding of No Significant Impact 157: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1157: Finding of No Significant Impact Methyl Chloride via Oxyhydrochlorination of Methane: A Building Black for Chemicals and Fuels from Natural Gas The proposed Federal action, to provide cost-shared financial assistance for demonstration of the OHC process in an engineering scale facility, does not constitute a major Federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment as defined by NEPA. This conclusion is based on the analysis contained in the EA. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required and DOE is issuing this FONSI. EA-1157-FONSI-1996.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1157: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1091: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1183: Finding of No Significant Impact

56

EA-1331: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1: Finding of No Significant Impact 1: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1331: Finding of No Significant Impact Remediation of Subsurface and Groundwater Contamination at the Rock Springs in situ Oil Shale Retort Site Based on the analysis and information provided in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed Federal action, to conduct air sparging at the Rock Springs in situ Oil Shale Retort Site in Sweetwater County, Wyoming, does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required and DOE is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact. EA-1331-FONSI-2000.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1331: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1219: Finding of No Significant Impact

57

EA-1292: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE has determined that the proposed action to use the listed treatment processes at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site does not constitute a major Federal action...

58

Chronological History of Federal Energy-Efficient Product Procurement...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Chronological History of Federal Energy-Efficient Product Procurement: Executive, Legislative and Regulatory Requirements, Actions and Mandates Chronological History of Federal...

59

Chronological History of Federal Energy-Efficient Product  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR 436) providing extensive guidance on energy-efficient purchasing practices to federal agency procurement officers. Actions: To the extent...

60

EA-1918: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

18: Finding of No Significant Impact 18: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1918: Finding of No Significant Impact Energy Efficiency Design Standards for New Federal Commercial and Multi-Family High-Rise Residential Buildings (Final Rule) Based upon the EA, DOE has determined that revising the Federal building energy efficiency standards for commercial and multi-family high-rise residential buildings to ASHRAE 90.1-2010 would not be a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA. Therefore, an environmental impact statement is not required, and DOE is issuing this FONSI. EA-1918-FONSI-2013.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1918: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1871: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1872: Draft Environmental Assessment

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

EA-1260: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

260: Finding of No Significant Impact 260: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1260: Finding of No Significant Impact Transfer of 1100 Area, Southern Rail Connection and Rolling Stock, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington Based on the analysis in the EA and comments received on the draft EA, DOE had decided that the proposed transfer of the 1100 "Area, southern rail connection, and rolling stockto a non-federal entity does not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting thequality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA. Therefore, an EIS for the proposed action is not required. EA-1260-FONSI-1998.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1260: Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact EIS-0222: Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0222: Final Environmental Impact Statement

62

EA-1236: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

236: Finding of No Significant Impact 236: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1236: Finding of No Significant Impact Preparation for Transfer of Ownership of Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 3, Natrona County, Wyoming Based on the analysis of the Sitewide Environmental Assessment for Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 3 (NPR-3) DOE has determined that the proposed action to conduct activities in anticipation of possible transfer of NPR-3 out of Federal operation is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act. Therefore an environmental impact statement is not required and DOE is issuing this finding of no significant impact. EA-1236-FONSI-1998.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1008: Final Environmental Assessment

63

EA-1219: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

19: Finding of No Significant Impact 19: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1219: Finding of No Significant Impact Hoe Creek Underground Coal Gasification Test Site Remediation Based upon the information and analysis provided in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed Federal action, to conduct air sparging with bioremediation at the Hoe Creek Underground Coal Gasification Test Site in Campbell County, Wyoming, does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required and DOE is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact. EA-1219-FONSI-1997.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1219: Final Environmental Assessment

64

EA-1080: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

80: Finding of No Significant Impact 80: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1080: Finding of No Significant Impact Commercial Demonstration of the NOXSO SO2/NOX Removal Flue Gas Cleanup System, IN and TN The Department of Energy has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) for a project proposed by NOXSO Corporation for the cost-shared design, construction, and operation of the NOXSO SO2/NOX Removal Flue Gas Cleanup System. DOE has determined that the proposed Federal action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act. Finding of No Significant Impact for the Proposed Commercial Demonstration of the NOXSO SO2/NOX Removal Flue Gas Cleanup System, DOE/EA-1080 (June 1995) More Documents & Publications

65

EA-1091: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1: Finding of No Significant Impact 1: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1091: Finding of No Significant Impact Calderon Cokemaking Process/Demonstration Project The proposed Federal action, to provide cost-shared financial assistance for a demonstration project including the modification of an existing process demonstration unit and operation for producing metallurgical grade coke, does not constitute a major Federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment as defined by NEPA. This conclusion is based on the analysis contained in the EA. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required and DOE is issuing this FONSI. EA-1091-FONSI-1996.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1091: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1157: Finding of No Significant Impact

66

Federal Register | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Register Register Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Reference Material: Federal Register Details Activities (0) Areas (0) Regions (0) Abstract: The Office of the Federal Register informs citizens of their rights and obligations, documents the actions of Federal agencies, and provides a forum for public participation in the democratic process. The publications provide access to a wide range of Federal benefits and opportunities for funding and contain comprehensive information about the various activities of the United States Government. The Federal Register is updated daily by 6 a.m. and is published Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays, and consists of four types of entries. Presidential Documents, including Executive orders and proclamations.

67

Finding of no significant impact for the interim action for cleanup of Pit 9 at the Radioactive Waste Management Complex, Idaho National Engineering Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an environmental assessment (EA), DOE/EA-0854, for an interim action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). The proposed action would be conducted at Pit 9, Operable Unit 7--10, located at the Subsurface Disposal Area (SDA) of the Radioactive Waste Management Complex (RWMC) at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL). The proposed action consists of construction of retrieval and processing buildings, excavation and retrieval of wastes from Pit 9, selective physical separation and chemical extraction, and stabilization of wastes either through thermal processing or by forming a stabilized concentrate. The proposed action would involve limited waste treatment process testing and full-scale waste treatment processing for cleaning up pre-1970 Transuranic (TRU) wastes in Pit 9. The purpose of this interim action is to expedite the overall cleanup at the RWMC and to reduce the risks associated with potential migration of Pit 9 wastes to the Snake River Plain Aquifer.

Not Available

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

68

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

21 21 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 226 / Friday, November 23, 2001 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY National Energy Technology Laboratory; Notice of Availability of a Financial Assistance Solicitation AGENCY: National Energy Technology Laboratory, Department of Energy (DOE). ACTION: Notice of availability of a financial assistance solicitation. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the intent to issue Financial Assistance Solicitation No. DE-PS26-02NT41423 entitled ''Black Liquor/Biomass Gasification Technology Support Research and Development.'' It is the intent of the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), on behalf of the Office of Industrial Technologies (OIT) in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, to solicit the submission of

69

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 9 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 17 / Thursday, January 25, 1996 / Notices Department of Energy Organization Act (Public Law 95-91), and rules and regulations issued in implementation of those Acts. Further information regarding this Advisory Board may be obtained from Rachel Murphy Samuel at (202) 586- 3279. Issued in Washington, DC, on January 18, 1996. JoAnne Whitman, Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer. [FR Doc. 96-1197 Filed 1-24-96; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450-01-P Alternative Strategies for the Long- Term Management and Use of Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride AGENCY: Department of Energy ACTION: Notice of Intent (NOI). SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) announces its intent to prepare a programmatic environmental impact statement (PEIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act

70

Energy Agency Coordinators for Energy Action Month  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Agency coordinators serve as primary Federal agency points of contact for Energy Action Month. Contact them if you have questions about implementing an Energy Action Month campaign.

71

EA-0300: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0: Finding of No Significant Impact 0: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-0300: Finding of No Significant Impact Energy Conservation Standards for New Federal Residential Buildings The Department of Energy prepared an environmental assessment (EA) of the proposed interim standards. The EA addresses the possible incremental environmental effects attributable to the application of the proposed interim standards to the design of new federal residential buildings. Based on the findings of the EA, DOE determined that the proposed interim standards do not constitute a major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, within the meaning of NEPA. Therefore, an environmental impact statement is not required. EA-0300-FONSI-1986.pdf More Documents & Publications

72

EA-1503: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1503: Finding of No Significant Impact 1503: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1503: Finding of No Significant Impact Vermont Electric Power Company Proposed Northern Loop Project In compliance with NEPA, DOE has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA; DOE/EA-1503), entitled Vermont Electric Power Company Proposed Northern Loop Project, to analyze the environmental impacts related to the proposed Federal action of authorizing the requested modifications to the existing PP-66 and PP-82 facilities. Based on the information contained in the EA, DOE has determined that the amendment of Presidential Permits PP-66 and PP-82, as requested in VELC0's application, would not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment and, therefore, does not require preparation of an environmental impact

73

National Action Plan on Demand Response  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Action Plan on Demand National Action Plan on Demand Action Plan on Demand National Action Plan on Demand Response Response Federal Utilities Partnership Working Group Federal Utilities Partnership Working Group November 18, 2008 November 18, 2008 Daniel Gore Daniel Gore Office of Energy Market Regulation Office of Energy Market Regulation Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The author's views do not necessarily represent the views of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Presentation Contents Presentation Contents Statutory Requirements Statutory Requirements National Assessment [Study] of Demand Response National Assessment [Study] of Demand Response National Action Plan on Demand Response National Action Plan on Demand Response General Discussion on Demand Response and Energy Outlook

74

EA-1712: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2: Finding of No Significant Impact 2: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1712: Finding of No Significant Impact Exide Technologies Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Application, Bristol, Tennessee, and Columbus, Georgia Based on the analyses in the environmental assessment, DOE determined that its Proposed Action, awarding a federal grant to Exide Technologies to facilitate expansion of operations at two existing Exide facilities, would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for Exide Technoligies Electric Drive Vehicles Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Application, Bristol, TN and Columbus, GA More Documents & Publications EA-1712: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1722: Finding of No Significant Impact

75

EA-1406: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EA-1406: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1406: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1406: Finding of No Significant Impact Ground Water Compliance at the New Rifle, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site On the basis of the Environmental Assessment. which analyzed relevant environmental issues and addressed the concerns of stakeholders, DOE finds that no significant impact will result from implementing the planned action at the New Rifle site. This FONSI is documented pursuant to NEPA, the Council on Environmental Quality's "Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA" codified at 40 CFR 1500, and DOE's "NEPA Implementing Procedures" codified at IO CFR 1021. The planned action does not constitute a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the environment within the mandate of NEPA.

76

EA-1655: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5: Finding of No Significant Impact 5: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1655: Finding of No Significant Impact The Berkeley Lab Laser Accelerator (BELLA) Laser Acquisition, Installation and Use for Research and Development The Proposed Action would create and operate an experimental facility for further advancing the development of laser-driven, plasma-based, particle beam accelerators. An existing, approximately 7,000-square-foot, accelerator laboratory area inside Building 71 at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) would be modified to accommodate the new facility. DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Finding of No Significant Impact for the Berkeley Lab Laser Accelerator

77

EA-1965: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

965: Finding of No Significant Impact 965: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1965: Finding of No Significant Impact Florida Atlantic University Southeast National Marine Renewable Energy Center's Offshore Marine Hydrokinetic Technology Testing Project, Florida Based on the environmental assessment (EA), DOE finds that the proposed action is not a major federal action that constitutes a significant effect on the human environment. This finding and decision is based on the consideration of DOE's NEPA implementing regulations (40 CFR Part 1021) and Council on Environmental Quality criteria for significance (40 CFR 1508.27), both with regard to the context and the intensity of impacts analyzed in the EA. Therefore, the proposed action does not require the preparation of an environmental impact statement.

78

EA-1563: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EA-1563: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1563: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1563: Finding of No Significant Impact National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stormwater Compliance Alternatives at the Savannah River Site, South Carolina The Department of Energy has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-1563) to analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed and alternative actions to protect the quality of State waters at 38 stormwater outfalls located at the Savannah River Site (SRS). Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. Finding of No Significant Impact for the National Pollutant Discharge

79

EA-1655: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

655: Finding of No Significant Impact 655: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1655: Finding of No Significant Impact The Berkeley Lab Laser Accelerator (BELLA) Laser Acquisition, Installation and Use for Research and Development The Proposed Action would create and operate an experimental facility for further advancing the development of laser-driven, plasma-based, particle beam accelerators. An existing, approximately 7,000-square-foot, accelerator laboratory area inside Building 71 at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) would be modified to accommodate the new facility. DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Finding of No Significant Impact for the Berkeley Lab Laser Accelerator

80

EA-1097: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7: Finding of No Significant Impact 7: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1097: Finding of No Significant Impact Solid waste Disposal - Nevada Test Site, Nye County, Nevada Based on the information and analysis in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action to modify the Area 23 landfill to comply with the new regulations and to close the Area 9 landfill and reopen it as Construction and Demolition debris landfill does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act. Thus, an environmental impact statement is not required to implement this action. EA-1097-FONSI-1995.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1097: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1097: Finding of No Significant Impact

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

EA-1965: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1965: Finding of No Significant Impact Florida Atlantic University Southeast National Marine Renewable Energy Center's Offshore Marine Hydrokinetic Technology Testing Project, Florida Based on the environmental assessment (EA), DOE finds that the proposed action is not a major federal action that constitutes a significant effect on the human environment. This finding and decision is based on the consideration of DOE's NEPA implementing regulations (40 CFR Part 1021) and Council on Environmental Quality criteria for significance (40 CFR 1508.27), both with regard to the context and the intensity of impacts analyzed in the EA. Therefore, the proposed action does not require the preparation of an environmental impact statement.

82

EA-1716: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1716: Finding of No Significant Impact Honeywell International, Inc., Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Project Massac County, Illinois Based on the analyses in the Environmental Assessment (EA), DOE determined that its proposed action-awarding a federal greant to Honeywell International Inc. (Honeywell) for the construction of a manufacturing plant to produce a critical battery material, lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF6)- would result in no significant adverse impacts. FInding of No Significant Impact for Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Project, Honeywell International, Inc, Massac County, Illinois, DOE/EA-1716, September 2010 More Documents & Publications

83

EA-1664: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4: Finding of No Significant Impact 4: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1664: Finding of No Significant Impact Energy Conservation Standards: Energy Conservation Standards for Fluorescent and Incandescent Lamps The U.S. Department of Energy has determined that the adoption of energy conservation standards for General Service Fluorescent Lamps and Incandescent Reflector Lamps as described in the final rule titled the "energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for General Service Fluorescent Lamps and Incandescent Reflector lamps," would not be a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Finding of No Significant Impact for 10 CFR Part 430 Energy Conservation Standards: Energy Conservation Standards for Fluorescent and Incandescent

84

Federal Identity Management Handbook  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Identity Management Handbook Federal Identity Management Handbook Version 0.1 December 2005 VERSION 0.1 Federal Identity Management Handbook Acknowledgements The Office of Management and Budget and the Federal Identity Credentialing Committee would like to acknowledge the significant contributions of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the Government Smart Card Interagency Advisory Board (IAB) for providing valuable contributions to the development of this handbook. A special thanks goes out to those who participated in the various workshops and provided valuable subject matter expertise and lessons learned. The comments received from other government and industry organizations are also acknowledged. VERSION 0.1 i

85

EA-1692: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2: Finding of No Significant Impact 2: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1692: Finding of No Significant Impact Red River Environmental Products, LLC, Construction and Start-up of an Activated Carbon Manufacturing Facility in Red River Parish, Louisiana The proposed action evaluated by the U.S. Department of Energy in this environmental assessment (EA) is to issue a loan guarantee in the amount of $245 million to Red River Environmental Products, LLC (RREP) to support construction and start-up of an Activated Carbon (AC) manufacturing facility in Red River Parish, Louisiana. The Department of Energy has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.

86

EA-0510: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0: Finding of No Significant Impact 0: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-0510: Finding of No Significant Impact High-Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (Sofc) Generator Development Project (METC) The proposed action, the Westinghouse Tubular SOFC Generator Development Project, does not constitute a major federal action normally requiring the preparation of an environmental impact statement. Based on the analysis provided in the EA, DOE determines that this action will not significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required. EA-0510-FONSI-1991.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-0510: Final Environmental Assessment WA_97_007_WESTINGHOUSE_ELECTRIC_CORPORATION_Waiver_of_Domest.pdf

87

EA-1663: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3: Finding of No Significant Impact 3: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1663: Finding of No Significant Impact British Petroleum (BP) Solar Array Project at Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York This Environmental Assessment (EA) presents an analysis of the potential environmental consequences of the United States (U.S.) Department of Energy providing access, through an easement, to BP Solar for the construction of a proposed 37 megawatt (MW) photovoltaic facility and a smaller 1-2 MW, Laboratory dedicated array at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) and compares the potential impacts to the No Action Alternative. The Department of Energy has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment

88

EA-1912: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2: Finding of No Significant Impact 2: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1912: Finding of No Significant Impact Midway-Benton No. 1 Rebuild Project, near town of Desert Aire, Benton County, WA Based on the information in the EA, as summarized here, BPA and DOE-RL determines that the Proposed Action is not a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA (42 United States Code 4321 et seq.). Therefore, an EIS will not be prepared and BPA and DOE-RL are issuing this FONSI for the Proposed Action. EA-1912-FONSI-2012.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1912: Draft Environmental Assessment EA-1912: Midway-Benton No. 1 Rebuild Project, near town of Desert Aire, Benton County, WA 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Bonneville Power Administration

89

EA-1916: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1916: Finding of No Significant Impact Ocean Renewable Power Company Maine, LLC Cobscook Bay Tidal Energy Pilot Project, Cobscook Bay in Washington County, Maine Based on the Final Environmental Assessment, DOE has determined that authorizing the expenditirure of federal funding to ORPC Maine to build, install, operate, and monitor a commercial-scale arry of five grid-connected TidGenTM hydrokinetic energy conversion devices on the sea floor in Cobscook Bay does not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the context of NEPA. Therefore, an EIS is not required and DOE is issuing this FONSI. EA-1916-FONSI-2012.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1916: Notice of Availability of a Finding of No Significant Impact

90

EA-1565: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

565: Finding of No Significant Impact 565: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1565: Finding of No Significant Impact Adopted Energy Conservation Standards for Distribution Transformers DOE has determined that the adoption of energy efficiency for liquid-immersed distribution transformers and medium-voltage dry-tape distribution transformers would not be a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality if the human environment. Finding of No Significant Impact: Energy Conservation Program for Commercial Equipment, Distribution Transformers More Documents & Publications Notice of Study Availability - Potential Benefits of Distributed Generation and Rate-Related Issues That May Impede Their Expansion: Federal Register Notice Volume 72, No. 40 - Mar. 1, 2007 Central Moloney: Noncompliance Determination (2013-SE-4702)

91

EA-1498: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

98: Finding of No Significant Impact 98: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1498: Finding of No Significant Impact Advanced Coal Utilization Byproduct Beneficiation Processing Plant Ghent Power Station, Carroll County, Kentucky The proposed Federal action is to provide funding, through a cooperative agreement with the University of Kentucky Research Foundation (UKRF), Center for Applied Energy Research (CAER), for the design, construction, and operation of an advanced coal ash beneficiation processing plant at Kentucky Utilities (KU) Ghent Power Station in Carroll County, Kentucky. Finding of No Significant Impact for Advanced Coal Utilization Byproduct Beneficiation Processing Plant Ghent Power Station, Carroll County, Kentucky, DOE/EA-1498 (December 2004) More Documents & Publications

92

EA-1120: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

20: Finding of No Significant Impact 20: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1120: Finding of No Significant Impact Solid Residues Treatment, Repackaging and Storage at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site Based on the information and analysis in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed treatment, repackaging and storage of solid residues at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required and DOE is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact for the proposed action. EA-1120-FONSI-1996.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1120: Final Environmental Assessment EA-0995: Finding of No Significant Impact

93

EA-1131: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

131: Finding of No Significant Impact 131: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1131: Finding of No Significant Impact Relocation of Neutron Tube Target Loading Operation, Los Alamos Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico The United States Department of Energy finds that there would be no significant impact from proceeding with its proposal to relocate NTTL operations from TA-21 to TA-16 at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico. DOE makes this Finding of No Significant Impact pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), the Council on Environmental Quality regulations, and the DOE NEPA regulations. Based on the environmental assessment that analyzes the relocation of operations, the proposed action does not constitute a major Federal action which would significantly affect the human environment

94

EA-1059: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1059: Finding of No Significant Impact 1059: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1059: Finding of No Significant Impact Radioactive Source Recovery Program The United States Department of Energy (DOE) finds that there would be no significant impact from proceeding with its proposal to establish a routine radioactive source recovery program at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico. DOE makes this Finding of No Significant Impact pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Council on Environmental Quality regulations, and the DOE NEPA regulations. Based on the environmental assessment that analyzes the source recovery program, the proposed action does not constitute a major Federal action which would significantly affect the human environment within the meaning of NEPA.

95

EA-1605: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1605: Finding of No Significant Impact Biomass Cogeneration and Heating Facilities at the Savannah River Site, South Carolina The Department of Energy has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-1605) to analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed construction and operation of new biomass cogeneration and heating facilities located at the Savannah River Site (SRS). DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment . Therefore, the preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required and DOE is issuing this finding of no significant impact (FONSI). Finding of No Significant Impact for Biomass Cogeneration and Heating

96

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Categorically Excluded Actions |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NEPA » National NEPA » National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Categorically Excluded Actions National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Categorically Excluded Actions Categorical Exclusions (CX) - Categorical exclusions are categories of actions that DOE has determined, by regulation, do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment and for which neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is typically required. Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations Part 1021, National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures, Appendices A and B to Subpart D, list DOE's categorical exclusions. Appendix A classes of actions are those actions considered to be general agency actions, such as awarding a contract or hiring personnel. Appendix B classes of actions

97

EA-1870: Mitigation Action Plan | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

70: Mitigation Action Plan 70: Mitigation Action Plan EA-1870: Mitigation Action Plan Utah Coal and Biomass Fueled Pilot Plant, Kanab, UT The Department of Energy (DOE) issues this Mitigation Action Plan (MAP) in conjunction with its Finding of No Significant Impact as to the department's proposed action of providing costshared funding for the Utah Coal and Biomass Fueled Pilot Plant Project. Based on the analyses in the Environmental Assessment (DOE/EA-1870), DOE determined that its proposed action allowing Viresco Energy, LLC (Viresco) to use federal funding to design, construct and operate a coal and biomass gasification pilot plant (pilot plant) - would not result in any significant environmental impacts. The pilot plant would evaluate the technical feasibility of using steam hydrogasification to convert coal and biomass (such as agricultural

98

EA-1933: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

33: Finding of No Significant Impact 33: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1933: Finding of No Significant Impact Yakama Nation Drop 4 Hydropower Project, Yakama Nation Reservation, WA Based on the Final EA, DOE has determined that providing federal funds to install an inline turbine on the WIP Main Canal to generate one megawatt of hydroelectric power, including design, construction, and installation of an inline turbine at Drop 4 and a power generating house, electrical substation, overhead transmission lines, and a downstream water diversion structure, would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the human quality of the human environment within the context of NEPA. Therefore, DOE is issuing this FONSI. EA-1933-FONSI-2012.pdf More Documents & Publications

99

EA-1809: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1809: Finding of No Significant Impact White Earth Nation Wind Energy Project II, Becker and Mahnomen Counties, MN DOE's Golden Field Office has determined that providing Congressionally Directed Federal Funding to the White Earth Nation to purchase and install up to four small mid-sized wind turbines at two sites near the towns of Waubun and Naytahwaush on the White Earth Reservation in Mahnomen County in western Minnesota would not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA. EA-1809-FONSI-2012.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1809: Draft Environmental Assessment EA-1809: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1809: Notice of Availability

100

EA-1916: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1916: Finding of No Significant Impact Ocean Renewable Power Company Maine, LLC Cobscook Bay Tidal Energy Pilot Project, Cobscook Bay in Washington County, Maine Based on the Final Environmental Assessment, DOE has determined that authorizing the expenditirure of federal funding to ORPC Maine to build, install, operate, and monitor a commercial-scale arry of five grid-connected TidGenTM hydrokinetic energy conversion devices on the sea floor in Cobscook Bay does not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the context of NEPA. Therefore, an EIS is not required and DOE is issuing this FONSI. EA-1916-FONSI-2012.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1916: Final Environmental Assessment

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution -  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on AddThis.com... Energy-Efficient Products Technology Deployment

102

Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Sustainable Sustainable Federal Fleets to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Operations & Maintenance Greenhouse Gases Water Efficiency Data Center Energy Efficiency Industrial Facilities Sustainable Federal Fleets Laboratories for the 21st Century Institutional Change

103

EA-1662: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2: Finding of No Significant Impact 2: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1662: Finding of No Significant Impact Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Certain Consumer Products (Dishwashers, Dehumidifiers, Microwave Ovens, and Electric and Gas Kitchen Ranges and Ovens) and for Certain Commercial and Industrial Equipment (Commercial Clothes Washers) This chapter describes potential environmental effects that may result from amended energy conservation standards for residential cooking products and commercial clothes washers. The Department of Energy has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Finding of No Significant Impact for 10 CFR Part 430 Energy Conservation

104

EA-1310: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

10: Finding of No Significant Impact 10: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1310: Finding of No Significant Impact Decontamination and Dismantlement of the Advanced Reactivity Measurement Facility and Coupled Fast Reactivity Measurements Facility at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Based on the analysis presented in the attached EA, and on public comment received on the draft predecision EA, I have determined that the proposed action does not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Therefore, preparation of an environmental impact statement is not required. EA-1310-FONSI-2000.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1310: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1772: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1083: Final Environmental Assessment

105

EA-1676: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6: Finding of No Significant Impact 6: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1676: Finding of No Significant Impact Loan Guarantee for U.S. Geothermal's Neal Hot Springs Geothermal Facility in Vale, Oregon The U.S. Department of Energy is proposing to issue a loan guarantee to U.S Geothermal Inc. (U.S Geothermal) for construction and startup of a geothermal facility (Facility) in Vale, Oregon. The Department of Energy has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Finding of No Significant Impact for Department of Energy Loan Guarantee For U.S. Geothermal's Neal Hot Springs Geothermal Facility in Vale, Oregon, DOE/EA-1676 (December 2009)

106

EA-1682: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

682: Finding of No Significant Impact 682: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1682: Finding of No Significant Impact Upgrades and Life Extension of the 242-A Evaporator, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington, Conducted under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 This EA evaluates the potential impacts from upgrading and extending the service life of the existing 242-A Evaporator located in the 200 East Area of the Hanford Site near Richland, Washington. The Department of Energy has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Finding of no Significant Impact for the Upgrades and Life Extension of the 242-A Evaporator, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington Conducted Under the

107

EA-1483: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

483: Finding of No Significant Impact 483: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1483: Finding of No Significant Impact Decontamination and Decommissioning of the Juggernaut Reactor at Argonne National Laboratory-East Argonne, Illinois DOE has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA), DOE/EA-1483, evaluating the decontamination and decommissioning of the Juggernaut Reactor at Argonne National Laboratory-East (ANL-E), in Argonne, Illinois. Based on the analysis in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). Finding of No Significant Impact for the Proposed Decontamination and Decommissioning of the Juggernaut Reactor at Argonne National Laboratory -

108

EA-1211: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

211: Finding of No Significant Impact 211: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1211: Finding of No Significant Impact Relocation and Storage of Isotopic Heat Sources, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington Based on the analysis in the EA (DOE/EA-1211), and after considering preapproval review comments of the State of Washington and the Yakama Indian Nation, I conclude that the proposed Relocation and Storage of Isotopic Heat Sources at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA. Therefore, an EIS for the proposed action is not required. EA-1211-FONSI-1997.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1211: Final Environmental Assessment EA-0915: Finding of No Significant Impact

109

EA-0881: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-0881: Finding of No Significant Impact Tank 241-c-103 Organic Vapor and Liquid Characterization and Supporting Activities, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington The proposed sampling of the vapor space and organic layer in Tank 241-C-103 and measuring of the thickness of the organic layer does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the NEPA. This finding is based on information and analysis in the EA. Therefore, an environmental impact statement is not required for this proposed action. EA-0881-FONSI-1992.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-0881: Final Environmental Assessment EA-0915: Final Environmental Assessment EA-0904: Finding of No Significant Impact

110

EA-1684: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1684: Finding of No Significant Impact Construction and Operation of the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan The U.S. Department of Energy proposes to fund the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams (FRIB) at Michigan State University (MSU). The Department of Energy has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Finding of No Significant Impact for DOE Funding of the Construction And Operation Of The Facility For Rare Isotope Beams, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, DOE/EA-1684 (September 2010) More Documents & Publications

111

EA-1146: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

46: Finding of No Significant Impact 46: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1146: Finding of No Significant Impact Radioactive Waste Storage at Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, Golden, Colorado Based on the information and analysis in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed increase in, and operation of, radioactive waste storage capacity at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site does not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 as amended. Therefore, an environmental impact statement is not required and DOE is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact for the proposed action. EA-1146-FONSI-1996.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1146: Final Environmental Assessment

112

EA-1917: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1917: Finding of No Significant Impact Wave Energy Test Facility Project, Newport, OR Based on the information presented in the Final EA, (DOE/EA-1917), and the commitment in the MAP to mitigate impacts on biological resources, including species protected under the ESA and the Marine Mammal Protection Act, to less-than-significant levels, DOE has determined that the Proposed Action will not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the context of NEPA. Therefore, the preparation of an environmental impact statement is not required, and DOE is issuing this Mitigated FONSI. EA-1917-FONSI-2012.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1917: Draft Environmental Assessment

113

EA-1705: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1705: Finding of No Significant Impact Construction and Operation of a Proposed Cellulosic Biorefinery, Mascoma Corporation, Kinross Charter Township, Michigan The frontier Project consists of the design, construction and operation of a biorefinery producing ethanol and other co-products from cellulosic materials utilizing a proprietary pretreatment and fermentation process. The Department of Energy has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Finding of No Significant Impact for the Construction and Operation of a Proposed Cellulosic Biorefinery, Mascoma Corporation, Kinross Charter

114

EA-1648: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8: Finding of No Significant Impact 8: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1648: Finding of No Significant Impact White Earth Nation Wind Energy Project, Becker County, Minnesota, White Earth Indian Reservation, U.S.A. This Congressionally Directed Funding would allow the White Earth Nation to build on the findings of a prior DOE First Steps grant in developing available wind resources. DOE has determined that this action would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Finding of No Significant Impact for the White Earth Nation Wind Energy Project Becker County, Minnesota, White Earth Indian Reservation, U.S.A., DOE/EA-1648 (April 2009) More Documents & Publications EA-1648: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1809: Notice of Availability

115

EA-1651: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1651: Finding of No Significant Impact U-233 Material Downblending and Disposition Project at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee This environmental assessment (EA) evaluates the impacts of planned activities to modify selected Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) facilities; process the ORNL inventory of uranium-233 (U-233); and transport the processed material to a long-term disposal facility. Based on the results of the analyses reported in the Final EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the context of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. Finding of No Significant Impact for U-233 Material Downblending and

116

EA-1486: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

486: Finding of No Significant Impact 486: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1486: Finding of No Significant Impact Methow Valley Irrigation District Project, East and West Diversion Screening Proposal Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has proposed to fund fish screen replacements at the Methow Valley Irrigation District's (MVID's) East and West Diversion canals, both located near Twisp, Washington, in Okanogan County. BPA has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act. Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) Methow Valley Irrigation District Project East and West Diversion Screening Project, DOE/EA-1486 (March 2004) More Documents & Publications

117

EA-1682: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2: Finding of No Significant Impact 2: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1682: Finding of No Significant Impact Upgrades and Life Extension of the 242-A Evaporator, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington, Conducted under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 This EA evaluates the potential impacts from upgrading and extending the service life of the existing 242-A Evaporator located in the 200 East Area of the Hanford Site near Richland, Washington. The Department of Energy has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Finding of no Significant Impact for the Upgrades and Life Extension of the 242-A Evaporator, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington Conducted Under the

118

EA-1336: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

336: Finding of No Significant Impact 336: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1336: Finding of No Significant Impact Ocean Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide Field Experiment This Finding of No Significant Impact is made pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 [42 U.S. Code 4321 et seq.]; the Council on Environmental Quality's Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA, Title 40 CFR, Part 1500-1508; and the DOE's NEPA Implementing Procedures, Title 10 CFR, Part 1021. The Proposed action does not constitute a major Federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required and DOE is issuing this FONSI. EA-1336-FEA-2001

119

EA-1535: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1535: Finding of No Significant Impact Uranium Leasing Program U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management prepared the Uranium Leasing Program Programmatic Environmental Assessment (PEA) (DOE/EA-1535) to evaluate its management alternatives for the future of DOE's Uranium Leasing Program (ULP). Based on the analyses in the final PEA, I have determined that the proposed action does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Finding of No Significant Impact for the Uranium Leasing Program, DOE/EA-1535 (July 2007) More Documents & Publications EA-1535: Final Programmatic Environmental Assessment EIS-0472: Notice of Intent to Prepare a Programmatic Environmental Impact

120

EA-1672: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2: Finding of No Significant Impact 2: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1672: Finding of No Significant Impact Basin Electric Power Cooperative Culbertson Combustion Turbine Generator Project Western Area Power Administration proposes to modify its transmission system to accommodate new generation resources from the peaking facility into the transmission system. Basin Electric would own and operate the peaking facility and associated features. The Department of Energy has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Finding of No Significant Impact, Culbertson Combustion Turbine Generator Project, Montana, DOE/EA-1672 (June 2009)

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

EA-1676: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

676: Finding of No Significant Impact 676: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1676: Finding of No Significant Impact Loan Guarantee for U.S. Geothermal's Neal Hot Springs Geothermal Facility in Vale, Oregon The U.S. Department of Energy is proposing to issue a loan guarantee to U.S Geothermal Inc. (U.S Geothermal) for construction and startup of a geothermal facility (Facility) in Vale, Oregon. The Department of Energy has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Finding of No Significant Impact for Department of Energy Loan Guarantee For U.S. Geothermal's Neal Hot Springs Geothermal Facility in Vale, Oregon, DOE/EA-1676 (December 2009)

122

EA-1770: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1770: Finding of No Significant Impact Photovoltaic Solar Project at the Durango, Colorado Site Based on the information and analysis in the EA, LM has determined that its Preferred Action (Alternative 2) will not constitute a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Finding of No Significant Impact Photovoltaic Solar Project at the Durango, Colorado, Disposal Site, La Plata County, DOE/EA 1770 (June 2011) More Documents & Publications EA-1770: Final Environmental Assessment 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Legacy Management (LM) 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Office of Legacy Management (LM), Grand

123

EA-1606: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

606: Finding of No Significant Impact 606: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1606: Finding of No Significant Impact Proposed Use of Savannah River Site Lands for Military Training, SC DOE prepared an environmental assessment to analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed use of Savannah River Site lands and facilities for military training. Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA. Therefore, the prepation of an environmental impact statement is not required and DOE is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1606-FONSI-2011.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1606: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1606: Draft Environmental Assessment

124

EA-1660: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0: Finding of No Significant Impact 0: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1660: Finding of No Significant Impact Combined Community Communications Facility and Infrastructure Cleanup on the Fitzner/Eberhardt Arid Lands Ecology Reserve, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington The Environmental Assessment (EA) provides information and analyses of proposed U.S. Department of Energy activities associated with consolidating existing communications operations and removing excess facilities and infrastructure within the Fitzner/Eberhardt Arid Lands Ecology Reserve (ALE) at the Hanford Site near the City of Richland, Washington. DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Finding of No Significant Impact for the Combined Community Communications

125

DOE/EA-1792 Finding of No Significant Impacts  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE/EA-1792 DOE/EA-1792 Finding of No Significant Impacts Page 2 of 12 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: The Final EA examines the potential environmental impacts of DOE's Proposed Action of authorizing UMaine to expend Federal funding to perform research on and development of floating offshore wind turbine platforms as well as a No Action Alternative, under which DOE would not authorize the UMaine to spend Federal funds on the proposed project. DOE assumed, for purposes of the EA, that UMaine would not conduct the offshore research and development of floating wind turbines without such financial assistance. The primary objective of UMaine testing the one-third scale floating wind turbines is to obtain motion and structural response data to compare and validate numerical models

126

National Action Plan on Demand Response | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

National Action Plan on Demand Response National Action Plan on Demand Response Presentation-given at the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) Fall 2008...

127

EO 13211: Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 5 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 22, 2001 / Presidential Documents Executive Order 13211 of May 18, 2001 Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect En- ergy Supply, Distribution, or Use By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to appropriately weigh and consider the effects of the Federal Government's regulations on the supply, distribution, and use of energy, it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. Policy. The Federal Government can significantly affect the supply, distribution, and use of energy. Yet there is often too little information regarding the effects that governmental regulatory action can have on energy. In order to provide more useful energy-related information and hence im-

128

EA-1785: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE determined that its proposed action - awarding a federal grant to Southeast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership to inject 125,000 tons of carbon dioxide per year for...

129

Federal Energy Management Program: Publications  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Energy Action Month Frequently Asked Questions Energy Action Month Frequently Asked Questions The Federal Energy Management Program's frequently asked questions (FAQs) database features answers to common Energy Action Month queries. Contact the Webmaster to suggest a new question or topic. To find answers to available FAQs, select a topic from the drop-down menu. Select One... Fleet Management Energy Action Month Energy Efficient Product Procurement Training Renewable Energy Technology Deployment Better Buildings Federal Award Type in a search term or phrase, AND/OR select a category, then click SEARCH.(Leave the text box blank and press SEARCH to return all results in the category.) Search by keyword or phrase: Exact Phrase All Words Any Word AND/OR Select a category: All Categories Promoting Energy Action Month

130

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

09 09 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 99 / Thursday, May 22, 1997 / Notices collection on the respondents, including through the use of information technology. Dated: May 16, 1997. Gloria Parker, Director, Information Resources Management Group. Office of Management Type of Review: New. Title: Department of Education Federal Cash Award Certification Statement and Department of Education Federal Cash Quarterly Confirmation Statement. Frequency: Annually. Affected Public: Business or other for- profit; Not for Profit institutions; Federal Government; State, Local or Tribal Government, SEAs or LEAs. Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour Burden: Responses: 12,000. Burden Hours: 38,160. Abstract: The collection of the Federal Cash Award Statement is necessary for the Agency to monitor cash advanced to

131

Federal Register  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

151 151 Rules and Regulations Federal Register Vol. 60, No. 203 Friday, October 20, 1995 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed to and codified in the Code of Federal IRegulations, which is published under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1610. The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each week. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Western Area Power Administration 10 CFR Part 905 Energy Planning and Management Program AGENCY: Western Area Power Administration, DOE. A cmoN: Final rule. summARv: The Western Area Power Administration is publishing this final rule to adopt an Energy Planning and

132

EA-1800: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1800: Finding of No Significant Impact Monarch Warren County Wind Turbine Project Lenox Township Warren County, Illinois The U.S. Department of Energy provided Federal funding appropriated under the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act 0(2009 to the Illinois Department ofComrnerce and Economic Opportunity (DeEO) under the State Energy Program (SEP). DeEO proposes to provide approximately $5 million of its SEP funds to Monarch Wind Power (MWP) for the Monarch Warren County Wind Turbine Project (MWTP). DOE's Proposed Action is to authorize the expenditure of Federal funding under State Energy Program to design, permit, and construct a l2·turbine, 19.2 megawatt wind energy facility south of Monmouth, Illinois. Each wind turbine would have a hub height of

133

EA-1905: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1905: Finding of No Significant Impact The DOE CBFO reviewed the BLM EA and found that the analysis adequately covered all areas of concern, but did not include a discussion of intentional destructive acts, which it is DOE policy to include in all of its EAs (DOE Memorandum, from the Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance to the DOE NEPA Community, December 1, 2006). Therefore, DOE is including a discussion of intentional destructive acts in this FONSI. Based on the analysis in the EA, and the additional analysis in this FONSI, DOE has determined that funding the proposed action does not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human or physical environment within the meaning of the National Environmental

134

EA-1488: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

488: Finding of No Significant Impact 488: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1488: Finding of No Significant Impact U-233 Disposition, Medical Isotope Production, and Building 3019 Complex Shutdown at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee The U. S. Department of Energy has completed an Environmental Assessment (EA) [DOE/EA-1488] that evaluates the processing of uranium-233 (233U) stored at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and other small quantities of similar material currently stored at other DOE sites in order to render it suitable for safe, long-term, economical storage. Based on the results of the analysis reported in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the

135

EA-1634: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4: Finding of No Significant Impact 4: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1634: Finding of No Significant Impact Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Seismic Life-Safety Modernization, and Replacement of General Purpose Buildings, Phase 2B The U.S. Department of Eneregy has completed an Environmental Assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-1634) for the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Seismic Life-Safety Modernization, and Replcaement of General Purpose Buildings, Phase 2B. Seventeen comment letters were received and addressed in the Final EA. Based on the analysis in the EA including the responses to the comments, DOE has determined that the Proposed Action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of

136

EA-1570: Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Assessment and Finding of No Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1570: Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Construction and Operation of Neutrinos at the Main Injector Off-Axis Electron Neutrino Appearance Experiment (NOvA) at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, and St. Louis County, Minnesota This Environmental Assessment (DOE/EA-1570) provides information and analysis of proposed U.S. Department of Energy activities associated with constructing and operating facilities for a new neutrino physics research program called NOvA. DOE has determined that the proposed action doesn't constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Finding of No Significant Impact for Construction and Operation of

137

EA-0981: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EA-0981: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-0981: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-0981: Finding of No Significant Impact Solid Waste Retrieval Complex, Enhanced Radioactive and Mixed Waste Storage Facility, Infrastructure Upgrades, and Central Waste Support Complex, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington Based on the analysis in the EA, and after considering the preapproval review comments of the State of Washington, the Nez Pierce Tribe, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, I conclude that the proposed action to initiate the proposed waste retrieval, the waste storage activities, the infrastructure upgrades, and the construction and operation of the CWSC does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA. Therefore,

138

EA-1905: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5: Finding of No Significant Impact 5: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1905: Finding of No Significant Impact The DOE CBFO reviewed the BLM EA and found that the analysis adequately covered all areas of concern, but did not include a discussion of intentional destructive acts, which it is DOE policy to include in all of its EAs (DOE Memorandum, from the Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance to the DOE NEPA Community, December 1, 2006). Therefore, DOE is including a discussion of intentional destructive acts in this FONSI. Based on the analysis in the EA, and the additional analysis in this FONSI, DOE has determined that funding the proposed action does not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human or physical environment within the meaning of the National Environmental

139

EA-1634: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

34: Finding of No Significant Impact 34: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1634: Finding of No Significant Impact Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Seismic Life-Safety Modernization, and Replacement of General Purpose Buildings, Phase 2B The U.S. Department of Eneregy has completed an Environmental Assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-1634) for the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Seismic Life-Safety Modernization, and Replcaement of General Purpose Buildings, Phase 2B. Seventeen comment letters were received and addressed in the Final EA. Based on the analysis in the EA including the responses to the comments, DOE has determined that the Proposed Action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of

140

EA-1262: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action to extend the McKay Bypass Canal at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site does not constitute a major Federal action...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

AGENCY: ACTION: DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ACTION: ACTION: DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Preparation for Transfer of Ownership of Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 3 Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the Transfer of Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 3 (DOE/EA-1236) SUMMARY: The Secretary of Energy is authorized to produce the Naval Petroleum Reserves No. 3 (NPR-3) at its maximum efficient rate (MER) consistent with sound engineering practices, for a period extending to Apr115 2000 subject to extension. Production at NPR-3 peaked in 1981 and has declined since until it has become a mature stripper field, with the average well yielding less than 2 barrels per day. The Department of Energy (DOE) has decided to discontinue Federal operation of NPR-3 at the end of its life

142

Findings of No Significant Impact (FONSI) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Services » NEPA Documents » Findings of No Significant Impact Services » NEPA Documents » Findings of No Significant Impact (FONSI) Findings of No Significant Impact (FONSI) Findings of No Significant Impact are public documents issued by a Federal agency briefly presenting the reasons why an action for which the agency has prepared an environmental assessment will not have a significant effect on the human environment and, therefore, will not require preparation of an environmental impact statement. If you have any trouble finding a specific document, please contact AskNEPA@hq.doe.gov for assistance. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD October 9, 2002 EA-1434: Finding of No Significant Impact Sunrise II Water Supply Line, Kern County, California October 2, 2002 EA-1449: Finding of No Significant Impact Commercial Demonstration of the Manufactured Aggregate Processing

143

EA-0923: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

923: Finding of No Significant Impact 923: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-0923: Finding of No Significant Impact Winnett School District Boiler Replacement Project Based on the analysis in the Environmental Assessment, the Department has determined that the installation of a new coal-fired system at the Winnett School District Complex does not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the NEPA. Therefore, the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement is not required and the Department is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact. EA-0923-FONSI-1993.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-0923: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1183: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-0962: Finding of No Significant Impact

144

EA-1714: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4: Finding of No Significant Impact 4: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1714: Finding of No Significant Impact Toda America, Incorporated, Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Project, Battle Creek, Michigan Based on the analyses in the Environmental Assessment, DOE determined that it;s proposed action, awarding a Federal grant to Toda America, Incorporated for the construction of a new manufacturing plant, would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Project Toda America, Incorporated Battle Creek, Michigan More Documents & Publications EA 1714: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1711: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1709: Finding of No Significant Impact

145

EA-1714: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EA-1714: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1714: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1714: Finding of No Significant Impact Toda America, Incorporated, Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Project, Battle Creek, Michigan Based on the analyses in the Environmental Assessment, DOE determined that it;s proposed action, awarding a Federal grant to Toda America, Incorporated for the construction of a new manufacturing plant, would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Project Toda America, Incorporated Battle Creek, Michigan More Documents & Publications EA 1714: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1711: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1678: Finding of No Significant Impact

146

EA-1725: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5: Finding of No Significant Impact 5: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1725: Finding of No Significant Impact SBE, Inc. Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Application, Power Ring Manufacturing Scale-up, Barre, Vermont Based on the analyses in the Environmental Assessment, DOE determined that its proposed action, awarding a federal grant to SBE Inc. to establish an advanced Direct Current Bus capacitor manufacturing facility, would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for SBE, Inc. Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Application Barre, Vermont More Documents & Publications EA-1725: Final Environmental Assessment Vermont Recovery Act State Memo EA-1722: Finding of No Significant Impact

147

EA-1711: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1: Finding of No Significant Impact 1: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1711: Finding of No Significant Impact Saft America, Inc. Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Application, Jacksonville, Florida Based on the analyses in the environmental assessment, DOE determined that its proposed action, awarding a federal grant to Saft America, Inc to construct and operate a high-volume manufacturing plant to make advanced lithium-ion cells and batteries, would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for Saft America, Inc. Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Application, Jacksonville, Florida More Documents & Publications EA-1711: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1709: Finding of No Significant Impact

148

Findings of No Significant Impact (FONSI) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Services » NEPA Documents » Findings of No Significant Impact Services » NEPA Documents » Findings of No Significant Impact (FONSI) Findings of No Significant Impact (FONSI) Findings of No Significant Impact are public documents issued by a Federal agency briefly presenting the reasons why an action for which the agency has prepared an environmental assessment will not have a significant effect on the human environment and, therefore, will not require preparation of an environmental impact statement. If you have any trouble finding a specific document, please contact AskNEPA@hq.doe.gov for assistance. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD November 13, 2013 EA-1965: Finding of No Significant Impact Florida Atlantic University Southeast National Marine Renewable Energy Center's Offshore Marine Hydrokinetic Technology Testing Project, Florida

149

EA-1711: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EA-1711: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1711: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1711: Finding of No Significant Impact Saft America, Inc. Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Application, Jacksonville, Florida Based on the analyses in the environmental assessment, DOE determined that its proposed action, awarding a federal grant to Saft America, Inc to construct and operate a high-volume manufacturing plant to make advanced lithium-ion cells and batteries, would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for Saft America, Inc. Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Application, Jacksonville, Florida More Documents & Publications EA-1711: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1709: Finding of No Significant Impact

150

EA-1255: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1255: Finding of No Significant Impact 1255: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1255: Finding of No Significant Impact Project Partnership Transportation of Foreign-Owned Enriched Uranium from the Republic of Georgia Based on the analysis in the Environmental Assessment for Project Partnership, and based on the previous Environmental Assessment (DOE/EA-1006) and Finding of No Significant Impact for Project Sapphire, DOE has determined that the transportation of about 5 kilograms of enriched uranium nuclear fuel from the Republic of Georgia to the United Kingdom does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the human environment. Therefore, an environmental impact statement is not required. EA-1255-FONSI-1998.pdf More Documents & Publications EA- 1255: Finding of No Significant Impact

151

EA-1802: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1802: Finding of No Significant Impact Chicago View Wind Project Chicago Heights, Cook County, Illinois The Department of Energy's Proposed Action is to authorize the expenditure of Federal funding appropriated under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 to design, permit, and construct the Chicago View Wind Project, a 1.5-megawatt wind turbine that would be sited on top of a construction debris landfill in Chicago Heights, southern Cook County, Illinois. Finding of No Significant Impact Chicago View Wind Project, Chicago Heights, Cook County, Illinois, DOE/EA-1802 (February 2011) More Documents & Publications EA-1802: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1807: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1753: Finding of No Significant Impact

152

EA-1087: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

87: Finding of No Significant Impact 87: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1087: Finding of No Significant Impact Proposed Induction Linac System Experiments in Building 51B at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California Based on the information and analysis in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposal to construct and operate the Induction Linac System Experiments project does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Therefore, a Finding of No Significant Impact is made and an Environmental Impact Statement is not required. EA-1087-FONSI-1995.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1087: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1065: Finding of No Significant Impact

153

EA-1065: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5: Finding of No Significant Impact 5: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1065: Finding of No Significant Impact Proposed Construction and Operation of a Genome Sequencing Facility in Building 64 at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, California Based on the information and analysis in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposal to construct and operate the Genome Sequencing Facility does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Therefore, a Finding of No Significant Impact is made and an Environmental Impact Statement is not required. EA-1065-FONSI-1995.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1065: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1087: Finding of No Significant Impact

154

EA- 1255: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1255: Finding of No Significant Impact 1255: Finding of No Significant Impact EA- 1255: Finding of No Significant Impact Project Partnership Transportation of Foreign-Owned Enriched Uranium from the Republic of Georgia Based on the analysis in this EA for Project Partnership, and based on the previous EA and Finding of No Significant Impact for Project Sapphire, the DOE has determined that the transportation of about 5 kilograms of enriched uranium nuclear fuel from the Republic of Georgia to the United Kingdom does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required. EA-1255-FONSI-1998.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1255: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1255: Final Environmental Assessment

155

Strengthening Federal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Jan. 24 Jan. 24 / Administration of George W. Bush, 2007 Executive Order 13423- Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management January 24, 2007 By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and to strengthen the environmental, energy, and transpor- tation management of Federal agencies, it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. Policy. It is the policy of the United States that Federal agencies conduct their environmental, transportation, and en- ergy-related activities under the law in sup- port of their respective missions in an envi- ronmentally, economically and fiscally sound, integrated, continuously improving, efficient, and sustainable manner. Sec. 2. Goals for Agencies. In imple-

156

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

44 44 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 12, 1996 / Notices will be issued this fall in accordance with the reallocation procedures contained in the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA). Under section 442(e) of the HEA, unexpended FWS funds returned to the Secretary must be reallocated to eligible institutions that used at least 10 percent of the total FWS Federal funds granted to the institution to compensate students employed in community services. Because reallocated FWS funds will be distributed on the basis of fair share shortfall criteria, institutions must also have a fair share shortfall to receive these funds. Institutions must use all the reallocated FWS Federal funds to compensate students employed in community services. To ensure

157

Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Facility Energy Facility Energy Checklist to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on AddThis.com... Project Assistance Training Outreach Awards for Saving Energy Energy Action Month FAQs Facility Checklist Home Energy Checklist Office Checklist Energy Coordinators Commit to Efficiency Facility Energy Checklist This checklist outlines actions that conserve energy within facilities.

158

Federal Register Notice  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

810 Federal Register 810 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 39 / Monday, February 28, 2011 / Proposed Rules Determination of Petition For reasons discussed above, the NRC denies PRM-51-13. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 16th day of February 2011. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Michael F. Weber, Acting Executive Director for Operations. [FR Doc. 2011-4347 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Part 61 [NRC-2011-0043] Public Workshop to Discuss Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Public Workshop and Request for Comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), in coordination with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), plans to conduct a workshop to discuss possible approaches to revising

159

Meeting Federal Energy Security Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Markel Markel SRA International Lawrence_Markel@sra.com Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Fall 2012 - October 16-17 Mobile, AL Sponsored by Alabama Power Theme Meeting energy security requirements in federal facilities provides opportunities for additional types of cooperation between utilities and the federal agencies. However, there are significant barriers to pursuing these opportunities - constraints on utilities and on federal agencies, as well as sometimes-competing objectives. Energy security encompasses sufficiency, surety, and sustainability.  Above all, energy security means having adequate power to conduct critical operations for the duration required (sufficiency).  Secondarily, and leading to sufficiency, is ensuring resilient energy supplies that are accessible when

160

Federal Energy Management Program: News  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

News News Subscribe to RSS News Feed RSS Feed icon December 17, 2013 Energy Department Announces Winner of the 2013 Better Buildings Federal Award Competition The Energy Department today announced that the General Services Administration's (GSA) United States Court House in Wichita, Kansas is the winner of the 2013 Better Buildings Federal Award. More December 5, 2013 Presidential Memorandum on Federal Leadership on Energy Management In the latest step under his Climate Action Plan, President Obama today signed a Memorandum directing the Federal Government to consume 20 percent of its electricity from renewable sources by 2020 - more than double the current level. More December 3, 2013 Obama Administration Expands Better Buildings Challenge to Multifamily Housing, Launches New Programs to Boost U.S. Energy Efficiency

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

EA-0962: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

62: Finding of No Significant Impact 62: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-0962: Finding of No Significant Impact Construction and Routine Operation of a 12-kilovolt Overhead Powerline and Formal Authorization for a 10-inch and 8-inch Fresh Water Pipeline Right-of-Way at Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 1, Kern County, California Based on the analysis in the Assessment, the Department has determined that the proposed construction and operation of the 12-kilovolt overhead powerline and authorization of the fresh water pipelines right-of-way on and adjacent to the Reserve do not constitute major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required, and the Department is issuing this Finding of No Significant

162

EA-1723: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1723: Finding of No Significant Impact General Motors LLC Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Application, White Marsh, Maryland, and Wixom, Michigan Based on the analyses in the environmental assessment, DOE determined that its proposed action - awarding a federal grant to General Motors, LLC to establish a second-generation Global Rear-Wheel Electric drive unit components facilities - would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for General Motors, LLC Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Application White Marsh, Maryland and Wixom, Michigan More Documents & Publications EA-1723: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1723: Draft Supplemental Environmental Assessment

163

EA-1740: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

740: Finding of No Significant Impact 740: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1740: Finding of No Significant Impact Thermal Energy Corporation Combined Heat and Power Project Houston, Texas DOE completed the Final Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Thermal Energy Corporation Combined Heat and Power Project, Houston, Texas (DOE/EA-1740). Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE determined that its proposed action-awarding a federal grant to the Thermal Energy Corporation (TECO) to facilitate installationg of a combined heat and power (CHP) system at the Texas Medical Center's district power plant in Houston, Texas-would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No SIgnificant Impact and Floodplain Statement of FIndings for the Thermal Energy Corporation Combined Heat and Power Project, Houston,

164

EA-1760: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1760: Finding of No Significant Impact FutureFuel Chemical Company Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Project, Batesville, Arkansas Based on the analyses in the Environmental Assessment, DOE determined that its proposed action, awarding a federal grant to FutureFuel Chemical Company, to partially fund the design, installation and operations of a commercial-scale plant to produce intermediate anode material for high-performance lithium-ion batteries would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Project Futurefuel Chemical Company Batesville, Arkansas More Documents & Publications

165

EA-1673: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3: Finding of No Significant Impact 3: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1673: Finding of No Significant Impact Energy Conservation Program for Certain Industrial Equipment: Energy Conservation Standards and Test Procedures for Commercial Heating, Air-Conditioning, and Water-Heating Equipment Based upon the environmental assessment, DOE has determined that the adoption of the amended energy conservation standards for commercial packaged boilers and new energy conservation standards for water-cooled and evaporatively-cooled commercial package air conditioners and heat pumps with a cooling capacity at or above 240,000 Btu/h and less than 760,000 Btu/h would not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Finding of No Significant Impact: Energy Conservation Program for Certain

166

EA-1740: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0: Finding of No Significant Impact 0: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1740: Finding of No Significant Impact Thermal Energy Corporation Combined Heat and Power Project Houston, Texas DOE completed the Final Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Thermal Energy Corporation Combined Heat and Power Project, Houston, Texas (DOE/EA-1740). Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE determined that its proposed action-awarding a federal grant to the Thermal Energy Corporation (TECO) to facilitate installationg of a combined heat and power (CHP) system at the Texas Medical Center's district power plant in Houston, Texas-would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No SIgnificant Impact and Floodplain Statement of FIndings for the Thermal Energy Corporation Combined Heat and Power Project, Houston,

167

EA-1925: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1925: Finding of No Significant Impact Midnight Point and Mahogany Geothermal Exploration Projects, Glass Buttes, Oregon Based on the final EA, DOE finds that providing federal funding for the Proposed Projects is not a major action that constitutes a significant effect on the human environment. This finding and decision is based on the consideration of DOE's NEPA implementing regulations (10 CFR Part 1021) and the CEQ's criteria for significance (40 CFR 1508.27), both with regard to the context and the intensity of impacts analyzed in the EA. Accordingly, the Proposed Projects do not require the preparation of an EIS. EA-1925-FONSI-2013.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1925: Draft Environmental Assessment EA-1925: Final Environmental Assessment

168

EA-1922: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1922: Finding of No Significant Impact Combined Power and Biomass Heating System, Fort Yukon, Alaska Based on the EA, DOE finds that providng federal funding for the Proposed Project is not a major action that constituents a significant effect on the human environment. This finding and decision is based on the consideration of DOE's NEPA implementing regulations (10 CFR Part 1021) and CEQ's criteria for significance (40 CFR 1508.27), both with regard to the context and the intensity of impacts analyzed in trhe EA. Accordingly, the Proposed Project does not require the preparation of an environmental impact statement. EA-1922-FONSI-2013.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1922: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1922: Draft Environmental Assessment

169

EA-1756: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6: Finding of No Significant Impact 6: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1756: Finding of No Significant Impact Battelle Memorial Institute's Smart Grid Project at the City of Ellensburg's Renewable Energy Park, Kittitas County, Washington Based on the analysis in the environmental assessment, DOE determined that the proposed action - providing federal assistance to Battelle Memorial Institute to facilitate the installaion of 540 additional solar panels, 10 solar concentrating modules, and 8 small wind energy generating systems at the City of Ellensburg's Renewable Energy Park - would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for the Battelle Memorial Institute's Smart Grid Project at the City of Ellensburg's Renewable Energy Park, Kittitas County, Washington

170

EA-1685: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1685: Finding of No Significant Impact Experimental Coal Flow Program at Clemson University The Western Area Power Administration (Western) is the lead Federal agency responsible for preparing the EA. Based on findings and analysis in the environmental assessment (EA), Western has determined that with the resource protection measures, the Parker-Planet Tap 69-kV Transmission Line would not result in any significant environmental impacts. The EA provides the basis for decisions on whether the effects to land, visual, water, biological, and cultural resources, as well as socioeconomic conditions, would be significant. Environmental Assessment for Parker-Planet Tap 69-kV Transmission Line Rebuild, Upgrade and Right-Of-Way Action, DOE/EA-1685 (June 2010) Finding

171

EA-1743: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3: Finding of No Significant Impact 3: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1743: Finding of No Significant Impact Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. Waste Energy Project at the AK Steel Corporation Middletown Works, Middletown, Ohio Based on the analyses in the environmental assessment, DOE determined that its proposed action - awarding a federal grant to Air Products and Chemicals, Inc to facilitate construction and operation of a waste energy recovery plant at the AK Steel Corporation Middletown Works - would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for the Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. Waste Energy Project at the AK Steel Corporation Middletown Works, Middletown, Ohio More Documents & Publications EA-1743: Final Environmental Assessment Project_Descriptions_ITP_ARRA_Awards.xls

172

EA-1775: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

775: Finding of No Significant Impact 775: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1775: Finding of No Significant Impact Texas A&M University Combined Heat and Power Project, College Station, Texas DOE completed the Final Environmental Assessment for the Texas A&M University Combined Heat and power Project, College Station, Texas (DOE/EA-1775). Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE determined that its proposed action-awarding a federal grant to Texas A&A University to facilitate installatino and operation of a high-efficiency combined heat and power system that would produce steam for heating and cooling as well as generate electricity-would result in no significant adverse impacts. FInding of No Significant Impact for the Txas A&M University Combined Heat and power Project, College Station, Texas

173

EA-0912: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

12: Finding of No Significant Impact 12: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-0912: Finding of No Significant Impact Urgent-Relief Acceptance of Foreign Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel Based on the analysis in the Environmental Assessment, and after careful consideration of comments received, DOE has determined that the acceptance of up to 409 spent nuclear fuel elements from eight foreign research reactors in Europe for storage at the Savannah River Site does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required, and DOE issues this Finding of No Significant Impact. EA-0912-FONSI-1994.pdf More Documents & Publications

174

EA-0970: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

70: Finding of No Significant Impact 70: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-0970: Finding of No Significant Impact Environmental Safety and Health Analytical Laboratory Project No. 94-AA-01 Pantex Plant Amarillo, TX Based on the information contained in the Environmental Assessment, the DOE determines that the construction and operation of the Environmental Safety and Health Analytical Laboratory at Pantex Plant and demolition of the existing Analytical Chemistry Laboratory does not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required. EA-0970-FONSI-1995.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-0970: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1533: Finding of No Significant Impact

175

EA-1635: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5: Finding of No Significant Impact 5: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1635: Finding of No Significant Impact Williston to Tioga Transmission Line Project, North Dakota Basin Electric Power Cooperative (BEPC) proposes to construct and operate a new 230-kilovolt (kV) transmission line to meet existing and future electric power requirements in northwestern North Dakota, and to interconnect this new transmission line to the Western Area Power Administration's (Western) transmission system. The EA identified no potentially significant impacts to environmental resources resulting from either Western's Federal action or Basin Electric's Proposed Project. Finding of No Significant Impact for Williston to Tioga Transmission Line Project Pre-Approval Review, DOE/EA-1635 (May 2010) More Documents & Publications

176

EA-1785: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

785: Finding of No Significant Impact 785: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1785: Finding of No Significant Impact Phase III Anthropogenic Test Characterization Project, Mobile County, Alabama Based on the analyses in the environmental assessment, DOE determined that its proposed action - awarding a federal grant to Southeast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership to inject 125,000 tons of carbon dioxide per year for three years into a deep saline aquifer - would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for Southeast regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership Phase III Anthropogenic Test Project Citronelle, Alabama More Documents & Publications EA-1785: Final Environmental Assessment Geologic Carbon Dioxide Storage Field Projects Supported by DOE's Sequestration Program

177

EA-1754: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1754: Finding of No Significant Impact Public Service Company of New Mexico, Photovoltaic Plus Battery for Simultaneous Voltage Smoothing and Peak Shifting Project, Bernalillo County, New Mexico Based on the analysis in the environmental assessment, DOE determined that the proposed action - providing federal asssitance to Public Service Company of New Mexico to facilitate the installation of an advanced absorbed valve-regulated lead acid battery for voltage smoothing and peak shifting - would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for the Public Service Company of New Mexico Photovoltaic Plus Battery for Simultaneous Voltage Smoothing and Peak Shifting Project, Bernalillo County, New Mexico

178

EA-1188: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1188: Finding of No Significant Impact Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and Santa Fe Energy Resources, Inc. Midway Valley 3D Seismic Project, Kern County, California Based on the results of the analysis in the Assessment, the Department of Energy has determined that the proposed 3-dimensional seismic survey does not constitute a major federal action that significantly affects the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required, and the Department of Energy is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact. EA-1188-FONSI-1999.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1188: Final Environmental Assessment CX-009523: Categorical Exclusion Determination

179

EA-1635: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

635: Finding of No Significant Impact 635: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1635: Finding of No Significant Impact Williston to Tioga Transmission Line Project, North Dakota Basin Electric Power Cooperative (BEPC) proposes to construct and operate a new 230-kilovolt (kV) transmission line to meet existing and future electric power requirements in northwestern North Dakota, and to interconnect this new transmission line to the Western Area Power Administration's (Western) transmission system. The EA identified no potentially significant impacts to environmental resources resulting from either Western's Federal action or Basin Electric's Proposed Project. Finding of No Significant Impact for Williston to Tioga Transmission Line Project Pre-Approval Review, DOE/EA-1635 (May 2010) More Documents & Publications

180

EA-1745: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1745: Finding of No Significant Impact Blast Furnace Gas Flare Capture Project at the ArcelorMittal USA, Inc., Indiana Harbor Steel Mill, East Chicago, Indiana Based on the analyses in the environmental assessment, DOE determined that its proposed action - awarding a federal grant to ArcelorMittal USA, Inc. to facilitate construction and operation of a boiler system that would convert blast furnace waste gas into electricity - would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for the Blast Furnace Gas Flare Capture Project at the Arcelormittal USA, Inc. Indiana Harbor Steel Mill, East Chicago, Indiana More Documents & Publications EA-1745: Final Environmental Assessment Project_Descriptions_ITP_ARRA_Awards.xls

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

EA-1742: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1742: Finding of No Significant Impact Rhode Island LFG Genco, LLC Combined Cycle Electricity Generation Plant Fueled by Landfill Gas, Johnston, Rhode Island Based on the analyses in the Environmental Assessment, DOE determined that its proposed action - awarding a federal grant to Rhode Island LFG Genco, LLC to facilitate expansion of an existing landfill gas collection system and construction and operation of a combined cycle landfill gas-to-electricity generating plant - would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for the Rhode Island LFg Genco, LLC Combined Cycle Electricity Generation Plant Fueled by Landfill Gas Johnston, Rhode Island More Documents & Publications EA-1742: Final Environmental Assessment

182

EA-1775: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1775: Finding of No Significant Impact Texas A&M University Combined Heat and Power Project, College Station, Texas DOE completed the Final Environmental Assessment for the Texas A&M University Combined Heat and power Project, College Station, Texas (DOE/EA-1775). Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE determined that its proposed action-awarding a federal grant to Texas A&A University to facilitate installatino and operation of a high-efficiency combined heat and power system that would produce steam for heating and cooling as well as generate electricity-would result in no significant adverse impacts. FInding of No Significant Impact for the Txas A&M University Combined Heat and power Project, College Station, Texas

183

Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds This Environmental Protection Agency report contains recommendations for a series of environmental actions, including those to increase environmental and economically beneficial landscaping practices at Federal facilities and federally funded projects. Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds More Documents & Publications Pollution Prevention - Environmental Impact Reduction Checklists for NEPA/309 Reviewers Memorandum to Heads of Federal Departments and Agencies Regarding Pollution Prevention and the National Environmental Policy Act EIS-0488: EPA Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact

184

Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds This Environmental Protection Agency report contains recommendations for a series of environmental actions, including those to increase environmental and economically beneficial landscaping practices at Federal facilities and federally funded projects. Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds More Documents & Publications Pollution Prevention - Environmental Impact Reduction Checklists for NEPA/309 Reviewers Memorandum to Heads of Federal Departments and Agencies Regarding Pollution Prevention and the National Environmental Policy Act Executive Order 13148-Greening the Government Through Leadership in

185

Emergencies and Emergency Actions | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Emergencies and Emergency Actions Emergencies and Emergency Actions Emergencies and Emergency Actions Selected documents on the topic of Emergencies and Emergency Actions under NEPA. May 12, 2010 Memorandum for Heads of Federal Departments and Agencies: Emergencies and NEPA With this Memorandum, the Council on Environmental Quality reiterates its previous guidance on the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environmental review of proposed emergency response actions.This memorandum clarifies that the previous guidance remains applicable to current situations and provides guidance on required agency environmental review. September 8, 2005 Memorandum for Federal NEPA Contacts: Emergency Actions and NEPA This Council on Environmental Quality memorandum provides general information on (1) the response to hurricane Katrina;

186

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

901 901 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 1, 2004 / Notices As a result of this dispute, the SLA requested the Secretary of Education to convene a Federal arbitration panel to hear this complaint. A panel was convened, and a hearing on this matter was held on May 13, 2002. Arbitration Panel Decision The arbitration panel heard the following issue: whether the Army's alleged failure to negotiate with the SLA in good faith for the full food services and dining facility attendant services contract at Ft. Campbell, Kentucky, constituted a violation of the Act (20 U.S.C. 107 et seq.) and the implementing regulations in 34 CFR part 395. After considering the evidence presented, the majority of the panel ruled that the Act clearly covers all

187

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

32 32 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 15, 1999 / Notices that the original selection list would remain in effect. The complainant requested review of the SLA's stipulated decision by a Federal arbitration panel. The panel was convened on April 17, 1998. Arbitration Panel Decision The issue before the arbitration panel was whether the SLA's stipulated decision to make a determination concerning the continuation of the special assignment process at the time a military base became available was inconsistent with the ALJ's determination. The arbitration panel ruled that, at the time a military base contract became available, there may be a compelling reason that would benefit both the program and the complainant that would justify not assigning complainant

188

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

66 66 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 142 / Friday, July 24, 1998 / Notices Dated: July 16, 1998. Richard D. Wilson, Acting Assistant Administrator. [FR Doc. 98-19832 Filed 7-23-98; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ER-FRL-5494-1] Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments Availability of EPA comments prepared July 6, 1998 Through July 10, 1998 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities AT (202) 564-5076. An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published

189

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 9 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 47 / Friday, March 8, 1996 / Notices Comment date: March 18, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E at the end of this notice. 13. Benjamin F. Montoya [Docket No. ID-2945-000] Take notice that on February 23, 1996, Benjamin F. Montoya (Applicant) tendered for filing an application under Section 305(b) of the Federal Power Act to hold the following positions: President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Public Service Company of New Mexico, a New Mexico corporation Director, Northwest Corporation Comment date: March 15, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E at the end of this notice. 14. Montana Power Company [Docket No. TX96-6-000] Take notice that on February 26, 1996, Montana Power Company (MPC) tendered for filing an application

190

Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Fleets Federal Fleets The Federal Fleet Program Overview outlines FEMP services and assistance available to Federal fleet managers to increase the use of alternative fuels and advanced vehicles. FEMP's Sustainable Federal Fleets website provides guidance and assistance to help implement Federal legislative and regulatory requirements mandating reduced petroleum consumption and increased alternative fuel use. FEMP's efforts include assisting agencies with implementing and managing energy-efficient and alternative fuel vehicles and facilitating a coordinated effort to reduce petroleum consumption and increase alternative fuel use annually. Content on Sustainable Federal Fleets spans Federal requirements and reporting compliance, alternative fuels and advanced vehicles, fleet performance data, analysis services, information resources, and FEMP contacts.

191

Presidential DocumentsFederal Register Vol. 59, No. 32  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Presidential DocumentsFederal Register Vol. 59, No. 32 Wednesday, February 16, 1994 Title 3-- The President Executive Order 12898 of February 11, 1994 Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice, and consistent with the principles set forth in the report on the National Performance Review, each Federal

192

EA-1921: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1: Finding of No Significant Impact 1: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1921: Finding of No Significant Impact Silver Peak Area Geothermal Exploration Project, Esmeralda County, NV Based on the evaluations in the final EA and subject to the mitigations imposed by BLM and DOE, DOE has determined that no significant impact on the human environment would occur as a result of DOE's proposed action to provide a $4.47 million federal grant and Rockwood's proposed project to explore for a geothermal resource that could support the production of electricity that would serve the lithium processing plant owned by Rockwood. Therefore, preparation of an EIS is not required, and DOE is issuing this FONSI. EA-1921-FONSI-2012.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1921: Final Environmental Assessment

193

EA-1753: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

753: Finding of No Significant Impact 753: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1753: Finding of No Significant Impact Beacon Power Corporation Flywheel Frequency Regulation Plant, Chicago Heights, Illinois Based on the analyses in the environmental assessment (EA), DOE determined that its proposed action--awarding a federal grand to Beacon Power Corporation (Beacon Power) to facilitate installation and operation of a 20-megawatt flywheel frequency regulation plant--would result in no significant adverse impacts. DOE further determined that the proposed project could result in beneficial impacts o the nation's energy efficiency and air quality. Operating the flywheel plant could result in a decrease in carbon dioxide emissions from regional power plants. In addition, there would be small positive socioeconomic impacts from the expenditures for the

194

EA-1887: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7: Finding of No Significant Impact 7: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1887: Finding of No Significant Impact Renewable Fuel Heat Plant Improvements at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado (DOE/EA-1573-S1) Based on the information presented in the Final SEA (DOE/EA-1573-S1), DOE has determined that the RFHP improvements and expansion of the sourcing of woody biomass fuels from Front Range sources to additional available regional sources do not constitute major federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment in the context of NEPA. Therefore, an EIS is not required, and DOE is issuing this FONSI. EA-1573-SEA-FONSI-2012.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1887: Supplemental Environmental Assessment EA-1573-S1: Proposed Renewable Fuel Heat Plant Improvements at the National

195

EA-1753: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3: Finding of No Significant Impact 3: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1753: Finding of No Significant Impact Beacon Power Corporation Flywheel Frequency Regulation Plant, Chicago Heights, Illinois Based on the analyses in the environmental assessment (EA), DOE determined that its proposed action--awarding a federal grand to Beacon Power Corporation (Beacon Power) to facilitate installation and operation of a 20-megawatt flywheel frequency regulation plant--would result in no significant adverse impacts. DOE further determined that the proposed project could result in beneficial impacts o the nation's energy efficiency and air quality. Operating the flywheel plant could result in a decrease in carbon dioxide emissions from regional power plants. In addition, there would be small positive socioeconomic impacts from the expenditures for the

196

EA-1178: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8: Finding of No Significant Impact 8: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1178: Finding of No Significant Impact 300 Area Steam Plant Replacement, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington Based on the analysis in the EA, and considering the comments from the Benton County Clean Air Authority and the State of Washington, I conclude that the proposed replacement of the centralized heating system with heating units for individual buildings or groups of buildings, constructing new natural gas pipelines to provide a fuel source for many of these units, construction of a central control building or conversion of an existing building to operate and maintain the system, and rerouting backup electrical lines and relocating air compressors does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment

197

EA-1175: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EA-1175: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1175: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1175: Finding of No Significant Impact Proposed Title Transfer of East Tennessee Technology Park Land and Facilities Based on the findings of DOE/EA-1175, DOE has determined that the proposed expansion of DOE's Reindustrialized Program to lease of land and facilities at East Tennessee Technology Park does not constitute a major Federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the context of the National Environmental Policy Act. Therefore, preparation of an environmental impact statement is not required. EA-1175-FONSI-1997.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1175: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1415: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1175: Final Environmental Assessment (Addendum)

198

EA-1833: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1833: Finding of No Significant Impact The City of El Dorado Wind Energy Project, El Dorado, Butler County, Kansas The U.S. Department of Energy's Proposed Action is to authorize the expenditure of federal funding appropriated under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to design, permit and construct the El Dorado Wind Energy Project, a 1.0 megawatt wind turbine to be located immediately west of the El Dorado Wetlands and Water Reclamation Facility in El Dorado, Butler County, Kansas. Finding of No Significant Impact and Floodplain Statement of Findings for the City of El Dorado Wind Energy Project, El Dorado, Butler County, Kansas, DOE/EA-1833 (February 2011) More Documents & Publications EA-1833: Final Environmental Assessment

199

EA-1815: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1815: Finding of No Significant Impact Cuyahoga County Agricultural Society Wind Energy Project, Berea, Cuyahoga County, Ohio The Department of Energy's proposed action is to authorize the expenditure of Federal funding appropriated under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to design, permit, and construct the Cuyahoga County Agricultural Society Wind Energy Project, a 660 kilowatt wind turbine at Cuyahoga County Fairgrounds in the center of the fairgrounds complex on 164 Eastland Road, Berea, Ohio. Finding of No Significant Impact Cuyahoga County Agricultural Society Wind Energy Project, Berea, Cuyahoga County, Ohio, DOE/EA-1815 (February 2011) More Documents & Publications EA-1815: DOE Notice of Availability of the

200

EA-1886: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1886: Finding of No Significant Impact Big Sky Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership - Phase III: Large Volume CO2 Injection-Site Characterization, Well Drilling, and Infrastructure Development, Injection, MVA, and Site Closure, Kevin Dome, Toole County, Montana Based on the findings of this EA and after careful consideration of all public and agency comments, DOE has determined that its proposed action of providing $63.8 million in the form of cost-shared federal funding and MSU's construction and operation of the Big Sky Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership Phase III: Kevin Dome Carbon Storage Project would not significantly affect the quality of the human environment. Therefore, preparation of an environmental impact statement is not

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

EA-1495: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5: Finding of No Significant Impact 5: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1495: Finding of No Significant Impact USEC Inc. American Centrifuge Lead Cascade Facility at Piketon, Ohio The purpose of NRC's proposed action is to authorize possession and use of source and special nuclear material at the Lead Cascade in Piketon, Ohio. Finding of No Significant Impact for the United States Enrichment Corporation Incorporated, American Centrifuge Lead Cascade Facility at Piketon, Ohio More Documents & Publications EIS-0468: Final Environmental Impact Statement Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-021 Report on the Effect the Low Enriched Uranium Delivered Under the Highly Enriched Uranium Agreement Between the USA and the Russian Federation has on the Domestic Uranium Mining, Conversion, and Enrichment Industries and

202

EA-0826: Revised Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

26: Revised Finding of No Significant Impact 26: Revised Finding of No Significant Impact EA-0826: Revised Finding of No Significant Impact Natural Resource Management Activities at the Savannah River Site, Aiken, SC The Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office (SR) prepared an environmental assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-0826) in 1993 to analyze the potential environmental impacts of continued management of natural resources at the Savannah River Site (SRS) located near Aiken, South Carolina. Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE-SR determined that the proposed action was not a major Federal action significantly affecting the human environment within the meaning of NEPA, and for that reason issued a finding of no significant impact (FONSI) dated July 15, 1993. Revised Finding of No Significant Impact for the Natural Resource

203

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE FUTURE LOCATION  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

30, 2002 DOEIEA-1438 . 30, 2002 DOEIEA-1438 . FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE FUTURE LOCATION OF HEAT SOURCEfRADIOISOTOPE POWER SYSTEM: ASSEMBLY AND TEST OPERATIONS CURRENTLY LOCATED AT THE MOUND SITE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (the Department) has completed an Environmental Assessment for the Future Location of the Reat SourcelRadioisotope Power System Assembly and Test Operations Currently Located at the Mound Site. Based on the analysis in the environmental assessment, the Department has determined that the proposed action, the relocation of the Department's heat source and radioisotope power system operations, does not constitute' a major Federal action significantly affecting the

204

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

893 893 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 158 / Friday, August 15, 2003 / Notices Title: Comprehensive Program Annual Performance Report. Frequency: One time. Affected Public: Not-for-profit institutions. Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour Burden: Responses: 140. Burden Hours: 2,800. Abstract: The Comprehensive Program is a discretionary grant program that makes competitive awards to support reform and innovations through projects that improve educational practice at the postsecondary level. Grantees annually submit a performance report to demonstrate that substantial progress is being made toward meeting the objectives of their projects. Reporting requirements are currently based on broad criteria from the Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR). This request is to

205

EA-1722: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

- awarding a federal grant to Toxco, Inc. to establish a new lithium-ion battery recycling plant - would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant...

206

EA-1194: Finding of No Significant Impact (Revised) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

194: Finding of No Significant Impact (Revised) 194: Finding of No Significant Impact (Revised) EA-1194: Finding of No Significant Impact (Revised) Expansion and Operation of the Central Shops Borrow Pit, Savannah River Site The Department of Energy prepared an environmental assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-1194) in 1997 for the expansion and operation of the existing Central Shops Borrow Pit (i.e., SRS Facility 632-G) at the Savannah River Site (SRS), located near Aiken, South Carolina. Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE determined that the action was not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of National Environmental Policy Act. Revised Finding of No Significant Impact for Expansion and Operation of the Central Shops Borrow Pit at the Savannah River Site

207

EA-1070: Revised Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

70: Revised Finding of No Significant Impact 70: Revised Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1070: Revised Finding of No Significant Impact Natural Fluctuation of Water Level in Par Pond and Reduced Water Flow in Steel Creek below L Lake at the Savannah River Site The Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) for the proposed natural fluctuation of water level in Par Pond, and reduced water flow in Steel Creek below L Lake at the Savannah River Site near Aiken, South Carolina. Based on analyses in the EA, DOE determined that the proposed action was not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act. Revised Finding of No Significant Impact for the Natural Fluctuation of Water Level in Par Pond and Reduced Water Flow in Steel Creek below L Lake

208

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 220 / Friday, November 14, 2003 / Notices 1 Because the plants' refueling schedules determine the availability for lead assembly use, Duke Power Company has submitted a license amendment request to the NRC to allow irradiation of MOX lead assemblies at Catawba. The SA also analyzes the use of the McGuire Nuclear Station (McGuire) in North Carolina, which could be used in lieu of Catawba, if a license amendment request were submitted and approved. SUMMARY: The Leader, Regulatory Information Management Group, Office of the Chief Information Officer, invites comments on the proposed information collection requests as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before January

209

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

57 57 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 22, 2005 / Notices shall include a detailed explanation of the dispute. Upon the other Manager's receipt of such notice, that Manager shall have 15 working days to provide to the disputing Party a written answer to the notice and explanation. The notice and answer, including any exhibits thereto, shall be the Record of Dispute. After such 15-day period has expired, the Managers shall make their best efforts to resolve the dispute within 20 working days. C. If the Managers do not resolve the dispute within 20 days, the dispute will be elevated to FWS's Regional Director and DOE's Rocky Flats Manager or successor. Within 30 working days of receiving the Record of Dispute, they shall confer and attempt to resolve the

210

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

13 13 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 223 / Friday, November 19, 1999 / Notices numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 15. The EPA would like to solicit comments to: (i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (iv) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated electronic,

211

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

09 09 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 1997 / Notices Information Officer, publishes this notice containing proposed information collection requests at the beginning of the Departmental review of the information collection. Each proposed information collection, grouped by office, contains the following: (1) Type of review requested, e.g., new, revision, extension, existing or reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of the collection; (4) Description of the need for, and proposed use of, the information; (5) Respondents and frequency of collection; and (6) Reporting and/or Recordkeeping burden. ED invites public comment at the address specified above. Copies of the requests are available from Patrick J. Sherrill at the address specified above. The Department of Education is

212

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 51 / Tuesday, March 16, 2004 / Notices meeting and will be provided opportunities to speak following previously scheduled speakers. Speakers will be requested to limit their initial comments to about five minutes. Speakers who need more than five minutes should indicate the length of time desired in their request. Depending on the number of speakers, DOE may need to limit speakers to five minutes initially but will provide additional opportunities as time permits. Speakers may also provide written materials to supplement their presentations. Oral and written comments will be given equal consideration. DOE will begin the meeting with an overview of the proposed Low-Emission Boiler System Project. The meeting will not be conducted as an evidentiary

213

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

146 146 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 122 / Friday, June 23, 2000 / Notices instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. EPA estimates that the changes discussed today, when implemented, will reduce burden by 23,000 hours and an insignificant number of dollars. Dated: June 14, 2000. Elizabeth Cotsworth, Director, Office of Solid Waste.

214

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

139 139 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 23, 2004 / Notices EIS until March 31, 2004. Once scoping ended, BPA revised the Scoping Summary to reflect all comments received, and republished the summary on April 7, 2004. Based on the results of the public scoping conducted for the Transmission Policy-Level EIS and internal considerations such as the current and most recently projected activities of BPA's Transmission Business Line and budget issues, BPA has decided that continued consideration of a comprehensive policy for BPA's transmission business is not in the best interests of the agency at this time. As a result, it is no longer necessary to proceed with preparation of the Transmission Policy-Level EIS. Therefore, BPA is issuing this notice of

215

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

78 78 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 17, 2005 / Notices requirements and practices for institutions participating in the Title IV, Higher Education Act (HEA) programs. The public is alerted that this package is a request for an extension of a currently approved collection. Until the anticipated reauthorization of the Higher Education Act and any resulting changes to the implementing regulations, the existing paperwork collection is simply extended, rather than revised. Requests for copies of the proposed information collection request may be accessed from http://edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting the ''Browse Pending Collections'' link and by clicking on link number 2853. When you access the information collection, click on ''Download Attachments'' to view.

216

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

87 87 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 173 / Thursday, September 5, 1996 / Notices of burden accurate, (4) how might the Department enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected, and (5) how might the Department minimize the burden of this collection on the respondents, including through the use of information technology. Dated: August 29, 1996. Gloria Parker, Director, Information Resources Group. Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Type of Review: New. Title: Guidance on the Goals 2000 Amendments (Draft). Frequency: One-time submission. Affected Public: State, local or Tribal Gov't, SEAs or LEAs. Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour Burden: Responses: 30 Burden Hours: 3,000 Abstract: The Omnibus Consolidated Rescissions and Appropriations Act of

217

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

04 04 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 130 / Monday, July 8, 2002 / Notices Background The claim in question arose when the Department's Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education (Assistant Secretary) issued a program determination letter (PDL) on March 26, 1997. The PDL demanded a refund of $1,846,718 of funds provided to the PRDE for school years 1991-92 and 1992-93 under Chapter 1 of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 2701 et seq. (1988)). Specifically, the Assistant Secretary found that the PRDE had used Chapter 1 funds to assess the educational needs of all public and private school children in violation of statutory and regulatory requirements that permitted the use of those funds only for programs designed to meet the

218

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

90 90 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 173 / Thursday, September 5, 1996 / Notices written comments concerning (1) the scope of the EIS, (2) the issues the EIS should address, and (3) the alternatives the EIS should analyze. Please address written comments to Mr. Grainger at the address indicated above. These comments should be postmarked by November 1, 1996 to ensure full consideration. Organizations and individuals wishing to participate in the public meeting can call 1-800-242-8269 between 8:30 AM and 5:00 PM Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, or submit their requests to Mr. Grainger at the address indicated above. DOE requests that anyone who wishes to speak at the scoping meeting preregister by contacting Mr. Grainger, either by phone or in writing. Preregistration

219

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2266 2266 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 86 / Thursday, May 3, 2001 / Notices The States eligible to apply for incentive grant awards, and the amount they are eligible to receive are Florida, $2,645,125; Indiana, $1,308,726; Kentucky, $1,400,631; Texas, $3,000,000; Utah, $882,167; and Vermont $843,351. The six eligible States must submit their applications for incentive funding to the Department of Labor by June 18, 2001. As set forth in the provisions of WIA section 503(b)(2), and 20 CFR 666.220(b), the application must include assurances that: A. The legislature of the State was consulted with respect to the development of the application. B. The application was approved by the Governor, the eligible agency for adult education (as defined in section 203 of WIA), and the State agency

220

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

07 07 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2004 / Notices assessment; and (f) environmental statistics. Process and Deadline for Submitting Nominations Any interested person or organization may nominate individuals qualified in the areas of expertise described above to serve on the Subcommittee. Nominations should be submitted in electronic format through the Form for Nominating Individuals to Panels of the EPA Science Advisory Board provided on the SAB Web site, http:// www.epa.gov/sab. The form can be accessed through a link on the blue navigational bar on the SAB Web site, http://www.epa.gov/sab. To be considered, all nominations must include the information required on that form. Anyone who is unable to submit nominations using this form, and any

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

247 247 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 138 / Wednesday, July 17, 1996 / Notices by the Secretary of Commerce. The purpose of this meeting is to review the 1996 Award applications and to select applications to be considered in the site visit stage of the evaluation. The applications under review contain trade secrets and proprietary commercial information submitted to the Government in confidence. DATES: The meeting will convene August 7, 1996, at 8:00 a.m. and adjourn at 5:00 p.m. on August 7, 1996. The entire meeting will be closed. ADDRESS: The meeting will be held at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Administration Building, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Harry Hertz, Director for Quality Programs, National Institute of

222

Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact: Implementation of the Wetland Mitigation Bank Program at the Savannah River Site  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-1205) for the proposed implementation of a wetland mitigation bank program at the Savannah River Site (SRS), located near Aiken, South Carolina. Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). Therefore, the preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required, and DOE is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) and Floodplain Statement of Findings.

N /A

1999-04-28T23:59:59.000Z

223

Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact: Pond B Dam Repair Project at the Savannah River Site  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-1285) for the proposed repair of the Pond B dam at the Savannah River Site (SRS), located near Aiken, South Carolina. Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). Therefore, the preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required, and DOE is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) and Floodplain Statement of Findings.

N /A

1999-09-27T23:59:59.000Z

224

DOE/EA-0826: Revised Finding of No Significant Impact for the Natural Resource Management Activities at the Savannah River Site (04/22/05)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact for the Natural Resource Management Activities at the Savannah River Site Agency: U.S. Department of Energy Action: Revised Finding of No Significant Impact Summary: The Department of Energy (DOE) Savannah River Operations Office (SR) prepared an environmental assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-0826) in 1993 to analyze the potential environmental impacts of continued management of natural resources at the Savannah River Site (SRS) located near Aiken, South Carolina. Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE-SR determined that the proposed action was not a major Federal action significantly affecting the human environment within the meaning of NEPA, and for that reason issued a finding of no significant impact (FONSI) dated July 15, 1993. The proposed action in that EA was based upon

225

Federal Energy Management Program: Institutional Change for Sustainability  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Sustainability Sustainability Graphic showing 5 gears. They progress from Determine Goal to Identify Context-Rules, Roles and Tools to Develop Action Plan to Implement Plan to Measure and Evaluate. Institutional Change Continuous Improvement Cycle The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) aims to help Federal agencies make sustainability a natural part of how they operate-while continuing to meet their mission goals. Through its Institutional Change activities, FEMP provides guidance and reference materials to help agencies and the myriad organizations within agencies shift their behavior in an effort to save energy and resources now and in the long-term. Institutional change integrates behavior with technologies and policies, recognizing that all three need to align to create make a significant and lasting difference.

226

Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

35245 35245 Vol. 77, No. 114 Wednesday, June 13, 2012 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Rural Utilities Service 7 CFR Part 1700 RIN 0572-AC23 Substantially Underserved Trust Areas (SUTA) AGENCY: Rural Utilities Service, USDA. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Rural Utilities Service (RUS) is issuing regulations related to loans and grants to finance the construction, acquisition, or improvement of infrastructure projects in Substantially Underserved Trust Areas (SUTA). The intent is to implement Section 306F of the Rural Electrification Act by providing the process by which eligible applicants may apply for funding by the agency. DATES: Effective: July 13, 2012. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michele Brooks, Director, Program Development and Regulatory Analysis,

227

EO 13212: Actions To Expedite Energy-Related Projects | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2: Actions To Expedite Energy-Related Projects 2: Actions To Expedite Energy-Related Projects EO 13212: Actions To Expedite Energy-Related Projects The increased production and transmission of energy in a safe and environmentally sound manner is essential to the well-being of the American people. In general, it is the policy of this Administration that executive departments and agencies (agencies) shall take appropriate actions, to the extent consistent with applicable law, to expedite projects that will increase the production, transmission, or conservation of energy. EO 13212: Actions To Expedite Energy-Related Projects More Documents & Publications Executive Order 13212 - Actions To Expedite Energy-Related Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 66, No. 99 - May 18, 2001 EO 13211: Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,

228

Finding of No Significant Impact Improvements at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Newsport News, Virginia  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

IMPROVEMENTS AT THE THOMAS JEFFERSON NATIONAL ACCELERATOR FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS AT THE THOMAS JEFFERSON NATIONAL ACCELERATOR FACILITY NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA AGENCY: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ACTION: FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has completed an Environmental Assessment (DOE/EA-1384) for proposed Improvements at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (Jefferson Lab). Newport News, Virginia. Based on the results of the impacts analysis reported in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the context of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). Therefore, preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not necessary, and DOE is issuing this Finding of No

229

Fiscal Year 2008 Annual Federal Performance Report On Executive Agency  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Fiscal Year 2008 Annual Federal Performance Report On Executive Fiscal Year 2008 Annual Federal Performance Report On Executive Agency Actions To Assist Historically Black Colleges And Universities Fiscal Year 2008 Annual Federal Performance Report On Executive Agency Actions To Assist Historically Black Colleges And Universities Packet of information to the Secretary of Education Fiscal Year 2008 Annual Federal Performance Report On Executive Agency Actions To Assist Historically Black Colleges And Universities More Documents & Publications Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs): Bridging the Gap between Federal Agencies and MSIs Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) -Historically Black Colleges and Universities 12 Annual Small Business Conference & Expo Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs)-Bridging the Gap Between Federal Agencies and MSIs

230

Proposed Rules Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

18954 18954 Vol. 76, No. 66 Wednesday, April 6, 2011 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 5 CFR Chapters XXIII and XXIV 10 CFR Chapters II, III, and X 18 CFR Chapter I 41 CFR Chapter 109 48 CFR Chapter 9 Reducing Regulatory Burden; Retrospective Review Under E.O. 13563 AGENCY: Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy. ACTION: Request for information; extension of public comment period. SUMMARY: On February 3, 2011, the Department of Energy (DOE) published a request for information (RFI) issued as part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ''Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review.'' This document announces that the period for submitting reply comments is extended to April 15, 2011. The February 3 document incorrectly published in the Notices section of the Federal Register.

231

SAVEnergy Action Plans  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy`s Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) is charged with carrying out key sections of EPACT and Executive Order 12903, to make the Federal government operate more efficiently. A congressionally mandated energy and water conservation audit program is one component of this growing DOE program. This paper traces the SAVEnergy Action Plan program throughout its development from (1) identifying projects and Agency champions, (2) establishing a protocol and fitting auditors into the program, (3) developing a data base to track the audits and measure their success, and (4) evaluating the process, learning from mistakes, and charting and transferring successes. A major tenet of the SAVEnergy program is to proactively prescreen all audit activities to ensure that -- where audits are done and Action Plans completed -- projects will be done.

Mayo, K.; Westby, R. [National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO (United States)] [National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO (United States); deMonsabert, S. [George Mason Univ., Fairfax, VA (United States)] [George Mason Univ., Fairfax, VA (United States); Ginsberg, M. [USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)] [USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)

1994-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

232

FEDERAL INFORMATION PROCESSING STANDARD  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

March 2004 FEDERAL INFORMATION PROCESSING STANDARD (FIPS) 199, STANDARDS FOR SECURITY Information Technology Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology A new Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS), recently approved by the Secretary of Commerce, will help federal agencies

233

EA-1890: DOE Notice of Availability of the Finding of No Significant Impact  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1890: DOE Notice of Availability of the Finding of No Significant Impact Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. (OPT), Reedsport PB150 Deployment and Ocean Test Project, Oregon Territorial Sea, off Reedsport, Oregon DOE's Golden Field Office has determined that providing Federal financial assistance to support the deployment and testing for one of OPT's single, full-scale 150kW PB150 PowerBuoys off the coast of Reedsport, Oregon, would not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Therefore the preparation of an environmental impact statement is not required and DOE hereby Adopts FERC's Environmental Assessment for Hydropower License (FERC Project No. 12713-002) for the

234

EA-1890: DOE Notice of Availability of the Finding of No Significant Impact  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

890: DOE Notice of Availability of the Finding of No 890: DOE Notice of Availability of the Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1890: DOE Notice of Availability of the Finding of No Significant Impact Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. (OPT), Reedsport PB150 Deployment and Ocean Test Project, Oregon Territorial Sea, off Reedsport, Oregon DOE's Golden Field Office has determined that providing Federal financial assistance to support the deployment and testing for one of OPT's single, full-scale 150kW PB150 PowerBuoys off the coast of Reedsport, Oregon, would not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Therefore the preparation of an environmental impact statement is not required and DOE hereby Adopts FERC's Environmental

235

EA-1339: Finding of No Significant Impact (Amended) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact (Amended) Finding of No Significant Impact (Amended) EA-1339: Finding of No Significant Impact (Amended) Waste Disposition Activities at Paducah Site, Paducah, Kentucky The U.S. Department of Energy has completed an environmental assessment addendum (DOE/EA-1339-A), which is incorporated herein by reference, for proposed disposition of 17,600 m3 of waste from the Paducah Site in Paducah, Kentucky. It is anticipated that most of the waste would be transported for disposal at various locations in the United States. Based on the results of the impact analysis reported in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the context of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). Therefore,

236

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Basics Federal Requirements By Regulation

237

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on AddThis.com... Energy-Efficient Products Technology Deployment Renewable Energy Federal Requirements Renewable Resources & Technologies

238

Memorandum for Heads of Federal Departments and Agencies: Emergencies and  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Heads of Federal Departments and Agencies: Heads of Federal Departments and Agencies: Emergencies and NEPA Memorandum for Heads of Federal Departments and Agencies: Emergencies and NEPA With this Memorandum, the Council on Environmental Quality reiterates its previous guidance on the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environmental review of proposed emergency response actions.This memorandum clarifies that the previous guidance remains applicable to current situations and provides guidance on required agency environmental review. Emergencies and NEPA More Documents & Publications Memorandum for Federal NEPA Contacts: Emergency Actions and NEPA Aligning National Environmental Policy Act Process with Environmental Management Systems Final Guidance on Improving the Process for Preparing Efficient and Timely

239

EA-1562-SA-1: Mitigation Action Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Construction and Operation of a Physical Sciences Facility at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington (Mitigation Action Plan for Phase II Build Out, North Federal Campus, PNNL Site)

240

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Facility Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on AddThis.com... Requirements by Subject

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products September 2011 Update to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products September 2011 Update on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products September 2011 Update on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products September 2011 Update on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products September 2011 Update on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products September 2011 Update on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal

242

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products November 2011 Update to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products November 2011 Update on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products November 2011 Update on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products November 2011 Update on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products November 2011 Update on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products November 2011 Update on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal

243

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products February 2012 Update to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products February 2012 Update on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products February 2012 Update on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products February 2012 Update on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products February 2012 Update on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products February 2012 Update on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal

244

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal

245

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Operations & Maintenance Greenhouse Gases Water Efficiency Basics

246

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Utility Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners on AddThis.com...

247

Federal Laboratory Technology Transfer  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Federal Laboratory Technology Transfer Fiscal Year 2007 Prepared by: National Institute to present to the President and the Congress this Federal Laboratory Technology Transfer Report summarizing the achievements of Federal technology transfer and partnering programs of the Federal research and development

Perkins, Richard A.

248

Federal Aviation Administration  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

transportation systems FAA's RDT&E Organization: Federal Laboratory for R&D of aviation systems IndependentFederal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation AdministrationNextGen: Primer, Challenges. Wilson N. Felder Director, FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center Date: 6 February 2012 #12;2Federal

249

Federal Resume Guide  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This Learning Module will offer helpful tips and suggestions on the development of a federal resume.

250

Commissioning for Federal Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Guide describes building commissioning, recommissioning, retrocommissioning, and continuous commissioning for federal facilities.

251

Federal Financial Report  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

FEDERAL FINANCIAL REPORT FEDERAL FINANCIAL REPORT (Follow form instructions) 1. Federal Agency and Organizational Element 2. Federal Grant or Other Identifying Number Assigned by Federal Agency Page of to Which Report is Submitted (To report multiple grants, use FFR Attachment) 1 pages 3. Recipient Organization (Name and complete address including Zip code) 4a. DUNS Number 4b. EIN 5. Recipient Account Number or Identifying Number 6. Report Type 7. Basis of Accounting

252

Federal / State Legislative & Regulatory Changes Required for Introduction of E15  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

EPA Waiver Decision, E15 Implementation Issues, Federal and State Blending Restrictions, Action by ASTM / NCWM to address higher ethanol blends

253

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CONVEYANCE OF PARCEL ED-6  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CONVEYANCE OF PARCEL ED-6 TO THE CITY OF OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact SUMMARY: The U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) has completed an Environmental Assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-1514) for the proposed conveyance of Parcel ED-6 to the city of Oak Ridge. The need for DOE action is the result of a request from the city of Oak Ridge to convey Parcel ED-6 under 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 770. The proposed action would also help the city to meet the goals stated in the Oak Ridge City Council's Strategic Plan, The Path Forward: 2003-2007, which identifies the development of new housing as a major initiative. DOE also recognizes that transferring land for local

254

Federal Compensation to Idaho for Public Domain Federal Lands, 1988-99 FederalCompensationtoIdaho  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

........................................................................................................ 9 Figure 7. Bingham County Federal Payments........................................................................................................ 12 Figure 15. Canyon County Federal Payments

O'Laughlin, Jay

255

Energy Action Month | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Services » Outreach » Energy Action Month Services » Outreach » Energy Action Month Energy Action Month October 7, 2013 - 4:43pm Addthis The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) supports Energy Action Month by offering materials that promote energy- and water-saving practices in Federal facilities. This year's outreach materials call on Federal employees to take action and empower leadership, innovation, and excellence to realize a secure energy future. Empower Leadership One individual can empower collaboration and teamwork that can spark change and result in sustainable solutions. Empower coworkers, groups, and entire organizations to lead by example, build momentum, and make a difference. Empower Innovation Innovative thinking can guide strategic sustainability plans, generate new best practices, and accelerate the deployment of clean energy technologies.

256

Monticello Mill site Federal Facility Agreement, December 22, 1988 Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Monticello Monticello Agreement Name Monticello (Utah) Site: Monticello Vicinity Properties NPL Site and Monticello Millsite Federal Facility Agreement Pursuant to CERCLA Section 120, December 22, 1988 State Utah Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, implementing, and monitoring appropriate response actions at the Site Parties DOE; US EPA; State of Utah Department of Environmental Health Date 12/22/1988 SCOPE * Identify Interim Remedial Action (IRA) alternatives, if any, which are appropriate at the Site prior to the implementation of final remedial actions for the Site. * Evaluate all past investigative and response actions taken at the Site and documented

257

Executive Order 12088: Federal Compliance with Pollution Control Standards  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The head of each Executive agency is responsible for ensuring that all necessary actions are taken for the prevention, control, and abatement of environmental pollution with respect to Federal...

258

SRS Reaches Significant Milestone with Waste Tank Closure  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Savannah River Site (SRS) achieved a significant milestone with the operational closure of tanks 18 and 19, meeting a federal agreement before the December 31, 2012, deadline.

259

EA-1816: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

of No Significant Impact Town of Hempstead Wind to Hydrogen Project, Hempstead, New York The Department of Energy is proposing to provide Federal funding to the Town of...

260

PRESERVATION OF FEDERAL RECORDS  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PRESERVATION OF FEDERAL RECORDS PRESERVATION OF FEDERAL RECORDS The Federal Records Act requires the Department of Energy (DOE) Records Officer to remind departing Federal and contractor employees that Federal records may not be removed from Government custody nor may they be destroyed except in accordance with a records disposition schedule that has been approved by the Archivist of the United States. The creation of adequate documentation and the preservation of Federal records are required by law and regulation (contained in 36 CFR Chapter XII). As Federal and contractor employees, you have Federal record-keeping responsibilities that are regulated by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) to ensure the retention and preservation of Federal records. PURPOSE The purpose of this brochure is to provide records exit procedures for

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

2010 Northwest Federal Market Assessment Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The primary intent of this market assessment is to provide insights on the effectiveness of current energy efficiency and renewable energy program offerings available to Federal sites in the region. The level of detail, quality and currency of the data used in this market assessment varies significantly by Federal agency and energy efficiency service provider. Limited access to some Federal sites, limited availability of key points of contact, time/resource constraints, and other considerations limited the total number of Federal agencies and energy efficiency service providers participating in the survey.

Scanlon, Tim; Sandusky, William F.

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

262

Integrating State and Federal Environmental Reviews  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NEPA and CEQA: Integrating State and Federal Environmental Reviews Draft for Public Review and Comment March 2013 2 Table of Contents: I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 II. Questions and Answers .................................................................................................................... 5 A. Stage 1: Preliminary Questions ................................................................................................. 5 1. How Does NEPA and CEQA Terminology Differ? .................................................... 5 a. "Action" (NEPA) versus "Project" (CEQA) ................................................ 5

263

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 18 CFR Chapter I (Docket No. RM05 Energy Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of Inquiry (NOI). SUMMARY: The Federal Energy Regulatory, the Commission is inviting comments on section 1233 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which defines native load

Laughlin, Robert B.

264

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Greenhouse Gas Inventories and  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Inventories and Performance to someone by E-mail Inventories and Performance to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Greenhouse Gas Inventories and Performance on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Greenhouse Gas Inventories and Performance on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Greenhouse Gas Inventories and Performance on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Greenhouse Gas Inventories and Performance on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Greenhouse Gas Inventories and Performance on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Greenhouse Gas Inventories and Performance on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Operations & Maintenance

265

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Industry Commitment to someone by E-mail Industry Commitment to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Industry Commitment on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Industry Commitment on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Industry Commitment on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Industry Commitment on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Industry Commitment on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Industry Commitment on AddThis.com... Energy Savings Performance Contracts

266

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy Efficiency Acquisition  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Energy Federal Energy Efficiency Acquisition Guidance and Requirements for Residential Heat Pump Water Heaters to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy Efficiency Acquisition Guidance and Requirements for Residential Heat Pump Water Heaters on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy Efficiency Acquisition Guidance and Requirements for Residential Heat Pump Water Heaters on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy Efficiency Acquisition Guidance and Requirements for Residential Heat Pump Water Heaters on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy Efficiency Acquisition Guidance and Requirements for Residential Heat Pump Water Heaters on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy Efficiency

267

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Participants to someone by E-mail Participants to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Participants on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Participants on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Participants on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Participants on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Participants on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Participants on AddThis.com... Energy Savings Performance Contracts ENABLE Utility Energy Service Contracts

268

Federal Facility Agreement progress report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The (SRS) Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) was made effective by the US. Environmental Protection Agency Region IV (EPA) on August 16, 1993. To meet the reporting requirements in Section XXV of the Agreement, the FFA Progress Report was developed. The FFA Progress Report is the first of a series of quarterly progress reports to be prepared by the SRS. As such this report describes the information and action taken to September 30, 1993 on the SRS units identified for investigation and remediation in the Agreement. This includes; rubble pits, runoff basins, retention basin, seepage basin, burning pits, H-Area Tank 16, and spill areas.

Not Available

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

269

Federal Acquisition Regulation; Federal Acquisition Circular  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 0 Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005-40 Federal Register /Vol. 75, No. 55 /Tuesday, March 23, 2010 /page 14059 A summary for the FAR rule follows. Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) (FAR case 2008-027) Effective Date: April 22, 2010. This final rule amends the FAR to implement section 872 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009. Section 872 requires the establishment of a data system, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), containing specific information on the integrity and performance of covered Federal agency contractors and grantees. FAPIIS is available for use in award decisions at www.ppirs.gov. Government input to FAPIIS is accomplished at www.cpars.csd.disa.mil.

270

The munitions provisions of the Federal Facility Compliance Act  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Federal Facility Compliance Act (FFCA) was signed by President Bush on October 6, 1992. This Act amends the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the primary law governing hazardous waste management in the US The most significant provision of the FFCA was the waiver of sovereign immunity. This waiver subjects Federal facilities to the same ``incentives`` as the private sector for compliance. While the waiver has broad implications for all Federal facilities, other provisions of the FFCA impact specific sectors of the Federal complex. The focus of this paper is the FFCA Munitions Provisions, which have the potential to change some aspects of the structure of munitions management within the military. The Munitions Provisions, contained in Section 107 of the FFCA, modifies Section 3004 of RCRA by adding a new subsection (y) on Munitions. Section 107 requires the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to develop, after consultation with the Department of Defense (DOD) and appropriate State officials, regulations identifying when military munitions (including conventional and chemical munitions) become hazardous waste, and to provide for the safe transportation and storage of such waste. The FFCA requires EPA to promulgate the final ``Munitions Rule`` by October 6, 1994. These are the only provisions of the FFCA that require a new rulemaking. It is clear that the Munitions Rule could have a significant effect on the way in which DOD manages munitions. Demilitarization, range management, training activities, and emergency response actions may be affected. It is important for DOD, the Services, and individual installations, to be aware of potential impacts of the FFCA on munitions management operations. The purpose of this paper is to review several important munitions Rule issues, and to discuss potential impacts of these issues.

Kimmell, T.A. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States); Green, D.R. [Brown and Root Environmental, Houston, TX (United States); Queen, R. [Army Environmental Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD (United States)

1994-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

271

June 2006 Standards Actions  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Page 1 June 2006 Page 1 June 2006 Technical Standards Program Manager's Note 1 Safety for Electrical Workers 2 Significant Federal Laws and Policies 3 Clearance of Solid Materials from Nuclear Facilities 5 Technical Standards Manager Spotlight 6 Topical Committee Developments 7 From the ANSI Web site 8 Don't Get "Board" With

272

Federal Agency NEPA Procedures  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Each Federal agency is required to develop NEPA procedures that supplement the CEQ Regulations. Developed in consultation with CEQ, Federal agency NEPA procedures must meet the standards in the CEQ...

273

Better Buildings Federal Award  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Better Buildings Federal Award recognizes the Federal Government's highest-performing buildings through a competition to reduce annual energy use intensity (Btu per square foot of facility space) on a year-over-year basis.

274

Tucannon River Spring Chinook Captive Broodstock Program Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) is proposing to fund the Tucannon River Spring Chinook Captive Broodstock Program, a small-scale production initiative designed to increase numbers of a weak but potentially recoverable population of spring chinook salmon in the Tucannon River in the State of Washington. BPA has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-l326) evaluating the proposed project. Based on the analysis in the EA, BPA has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. Therefore, the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required, and BPA is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI).

N /A

2000-05-24T23:59:59.000Z

275

What is the Federal Demonstration Project  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Federal Demonstration Project is a cooperative effort between a number of universities, a private research institute, and several federal agencies to increase research productivity by eliminating unnecessary administrative procedures and by streamlining and standardizing needed controls. The Project aims to locate responsibility for decision-making as close as possible to principal investigators while maintaining necessary institutional and agency oversight to ensure accountability. By freeing researchers from some of their paperwork burden, more efficient research administration systems will enable investigators to spend more of their time doing science and engineering. The Federal Demonstration Project is an outgrowth of an earlier activity sponsored by five major federal R D agencies at the Florida State University System and the University of Miami. In Florida, the focus was on standardizing and streamlining procedures for administering research grants after the grants had been awarded to the universities. (See Attachment 1 for descriptions of the demonstrations carried out under the Florida Demonstration Project). In May 1988, the most successful of the demonstrated procedures were approved by the US Office of Management and Budget for use in grants awarded by any federal agency to any research organization. The new procedures give agencies authority to waive requirements that grantees obtain federal approval prior to taking a number of administrative actions with respect to grant management. The FDP institutions together with the participating federal agencies are designing and demonstrating innovative research administration procedures and are assessing the impact of those new procedures.

Not Available

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

276

Federal Employee Training  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

the Chief Human Capital Officer the Chief Human Capital Officer Office of Learning and Workforce Development July 26, 2011 Federal Employee Training Desk Reference Federal Employee Training Federal Employee Training Page 2 of 53 July 26, 2011 Desk Reference Contents CHAPTER I. TRAINING REQUESTs, APPROVALs, AUTHORIZATIONS AND ALLOWABLE COSTs ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 1. TRAINING REQUESTS. ................................................................................................................. 3 2. TRAINING APPROVALS. .............................................................................................................. 3

277

Federal Government Presence in  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

% since 1993 Source: Statistics Canada, Public Sector Employment, Table 183-0002. Figure 4 Federal of Federal Employment Source: Statistics Canada, Public Sector Employment, Table 183-0002. Figure 6 Federal #12;Employment Shares Across Provinces Source: Statistics Canada, Population, Table 51-0001 and Public

deYoung, Brad

278

Federal Metering Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation—given at the Spring 2013 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meeting—covers the 42 USC 8253 Energy Management Requirement; Executive Order 13514(g) High-Performance Sustainable Federal Buildings; federal metering needs, history, and status; and utility/agency opportunities.

279

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT POWER MARKETS The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today ordered its staff to conduct investigators will find out if any technical or operational factors, federal or state regulatory prohibitions

Laughlin, Robert B.

280

Federal Employee Training Manual  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Manual provides detailed requirements to supplement DOE O 360.1B, FEDERAL EMPLOYEE TRAINING. The information in this Manual is intended to assist in improving Federal workforce performance under Department of Energy (DOE) managed Federal employee training. Cancels DOE M 360.1A-1. Canceled by DOE O 360.1C.

2001-10-11T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Federal Employee Training Manual  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Manual provides detailed requirements to supplement DOE O 360.1A, Federal Employee Training, dated 9-21-99. The information in this Manual is intended to assist in improving Federal workforce performance under Department of Energy (DOE) managed Federal employee training. Canceled by DOE M 360.1-1B.

1999-09-21T23:59:59.000Z

282

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Energy and Federal Energy and Water Management Awards to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management Awards on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management Awards on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management Awards on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management Awards on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management Awards on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management Awards on AddThis.com... Project Assistance Training Outreach Awards for Saving Energy Federal Energy and Water Management Better Buildings Federal Award

283

Finding of No Significant Impact for the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Compliance Alternatives at the Savannah River Site  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Compliance Alternatives at the Savannah River Site Agency: U.S. Department of Energy Action: Finding of No Significant Impact Summary: The Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-1563) to analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed and alternative actions to protect the quality of State waters at 38 stormwater outfalls located at the Savannah River Site (SRS). The draft EA was made available to the States of South Carolina and Georgia, and to the public, for a 30-day comment period. Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within

284

Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 342: Area 23 Mercury Fire Training Pit, Nevada Test Site, Nevada  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document has been prepared for the Nevada Test Site's Area 23 Mercury Fire Training Pit (Corrective Action Unit 342) in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO, 1996). Corrective Action Unit 342 is comprised of Corrective Action Site 23-56-01. The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document is to identify and provide a rationale for the selection of a recommended corrective action alternative for Corrective Action Unit 342. The scope of this document consists of the following: Develop corrective action objectives; Identify corrective action alternative screening criteria; Develop corrective action alternatives; Perform detailed and comparative evaluations of corrective action alternatives in relation to corrective action objectives and screening criteria; and Recommend and justify a preferred corrective action alternative for the Corrective Action Unit.

DOE /NV

1999-05-26T23:59:59.000Z

285

Evidence-Based Background Material Underlying Guidance for Federal Agencies in Implementing Strategic Sustainability Performance Plans  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Report is part of a larger, programmatic effort to assist Federal agencies in taking action and changing their institutions to achieve and maintain Federal sustainability goals, while meeting their mission goals. This document contributes to this larger goal by laying out the conceptual and evidentiary underpinnings of institutional change in this guidance to Federal agencies.

286

Revised Finding of No Significant Impact for Safeguards and Security Upgrades for Storage of Plutonium Materials at the Savannah River Site (DOE/EA-1538)(03/11/08)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact for Safeguards and Security Upgrades for Storage of Plutonium Materials at the Savannah River Site Agency: U.S. Department of Energy Action: Revised Finding of No Significant Impact Summary: The Department of Energy (DOE) prepared an environmental assessment (EA) (DOEEA-1538) in 2005 to evaluate the potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of proposed and alternative actions to enhance the safe and secure storage of plutonium-bearing materials at the Savannah River Site (SRS) to meet the enhanced terrorist threat that has existed since the events of September 11, 2001. Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE determined that the proposed action was not a major Federal action significantly affecting

287

Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) 2003 Annual Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Technical Capability Program FY 2003 Annual Plan Washington, D.C. 20585 September 2002 FTCP FY 2003 Annual Action Plan INTRODUCTION The U.S. Department of Energy's Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) provides management direction to assist the Federal workforce in maintaining necessary technical competencies to safely operate its defense nuclear facilities. The Federal Technical Capability Panel (Panel) consists of senior technical safety managers representing nuclear facilities, and reports to the Deputy Secretary for workforce safety technical capabilities' matters. The Panel will continue to pursue progress in the following areas: 1. Continued development of senior management commitment and support for the technical intern

288

Non-Federal Participation In Ac Intertie Final Environmental Impact Statement  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Non-Federal Participation In Ac Intertie Non-Federal Participation In Ac Intertie Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1: Environmental Analysis Bonneville DOE/eis-0145 POWER ADMINISTRATION January 1994 Non-Federal Participation in AC Intertie Final Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS - 0145) Responsible Agency: U.S. Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Title of Proposed Action: Non-Federal Participation in AC Intertie States and Other Areas Involved: Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana, California, Nevada, Utah, New Mexico, Arizona, Wyoming, British Columbia Abstract: BPA is considering action in two areas: (1) non-Federal access to

289

EA-1875: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

of No Significant Impact EA-1875: Finding of No Significant Impact The Jackson Laboratory Biomass Energy Center Project, Bar Harbor, Maine DOE's proposed action is to authorize the...

290

EA-1858: DOE Notice of Availability and Notice of Floodplain Action |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8: DOE Notice of Availability and Notice of Floodplain Action 8: DOE Notice of Availability and Notice of Floodplain Action EA-1858: DOE Notice of Availability and Notice of Floodplain Action Nippon Paper Industries USA Company Biomass Cogeneration Project, Port Angeles, Washington The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is proposing to provide American Reinvestment and Recovery Act federal funding to the Washington Department of Commerce under the State Energy Program to Nippon Paper Industries USA Company to construct and operate a new biomass-fueled cogeneration facility in Port Angeles, Washington. Notice of Availability and Notice of Floodplain Action: Nippon Paper Industries USA Company Biomass Cogeneration Project, Port Angeles, Washington DOE/EA 1858 More Documents & Publications EA-1858: Finding of No Significant Impact

291

60-DAY Federal Register Notice - Proposed  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

60-DAY Federal Register Notice - Proposed 60-DAY Federal Register Notice - Proposed [6450-01-P] DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Proposed Agency Information Collection AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy ACTION: Notice and Request for Comments SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) invites public comment on a proposed collection of information that DOE is developing for submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Comments are invited on: (a) whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the

292

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products March 2013 Update to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products March 2013 Update on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products March 2013 Update on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products March 2013 Update on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products March 2013 Update on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products March 2013 Update on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products March 2013 Update on

293

EA-1792-S1: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-S1: Finding of No Significant Impact 2-S1: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1792-S1: Finding of No Significant Impact The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has completed a Supplemental Environmental Assessment (Supplemental EA)(DOE/EA-1792-S1) for the University of Maine's (UMaine) Deepwater Offshore Floating Wind Turbine Testing and Demonstration Project - Castine. Based on the analysis in the Supplemental EA, DOE has determined that the decision to authorize the expenditure of Congressionally directed federal funding by UMaine to proceed with the deployment, testing, and retrieval of one small-scale floating turbine at the Castine site, analyzed under DOE's Proposed Action and UMaine's proposed project, will not significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaining of the National

294

Increasing Federal Office Building Water Efficiency, Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) (Fact Sheet)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

requires a two percent annual reduction in water use (compared to requires a two percent annual reduction in water use (compared to a FY 2007 baseline), significantly reducing total Federal water consumption by FY 2020. View Federal water requirements at www.femp.energy.gov/program/waterefficiency_ requirements.html. Increasing Federal Office Building Water Efficiency With less than one percent of Earth's water available for human use, the Federal Government is leading by example with water efficiency and conservation efforts. Federal laws and regulations require agencies to implement water efficiency efforts and reduce water consumption, making water an integral part of every comprehensive resource management program. Water Management Planning A comprehensive water management plan includes clear information on how a Federal facility uses water from

295

Federal Stewardship | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Federal Stewardship Federal Stewardship Ames Site Office (AMSO) AMSO Home About Organization Chart .pdf file (113KB) Federal Stewardship Internal Site Office Operations Jobs Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Ames Site Office U.S. Department of Energy 9800 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 P: (630) 252-6167 F: (630) 252-2855 About Federal Stewardship Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Federal Stewardship maintains and protects Federal assets at the Ames Laboratory or assigned to the Ames Site Office. Objectives Reviews and assesses Ames Laboratory and support activities and stewardship needs against the contract requirements and takes action, as necessary. Develops and maintains an effective working relationship and communication

296

Presidential Memorandum on Federal Leadership on Energy Management |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Presidential Memorandum on Federal Leadership on Energy Management Presidential Memorandum on Federal Leadership on Energy Management Presidential Memorandum on Federal Leadership on Energy Management December 5, 2013 - 2:52pm Addthis In the latest step under his Climate Action Plan, President Obama today signed a Memorandum directing the Federal Government to consume 20 percent of its electricity from renewable sources by 2020 - more than double the current level. Meeting this renewable energy goal will reduce pollution in our communities, promote American energy independence, and support homegrown energy produced by American workers. In 2009, the President directed the Federal Government to become a leader in clean energy and energy efficiency when he signed Executive Order 13514 on Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance,

297

Federal NEPA Contacts  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

CEQ and most Federal agencies identify primary points of contact for NEPA compliance. Normally a senior environmental professional, environmental law attorney, or member of agency leadership, these...

298

Federal Employee Health Services  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The order establishes requirements and responsibilities for occupational medical, employee assistance, and workers' compensation programs for Federal employees. Cancels DOE O 341.1.

2007-10-18T23:59:59.000Z

299

Non-Federal Participation Federal Marketing and Joint Ventures : Administrator`s Record of Decision.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

By this Record of Decision, the Bonneville Power Administrtion (BPA) adopts the Federal Marketing and Joint Ventures alternative to guide future BPA contract negotiations involving use of the Pacific Northwest-Pacific Southwest AC Intertie (Intertie). To implement this concept, BPa intends to negotiate an array of flexible, market-oriented contracts, expanded Intertie access for non-BPA parties, efficient use of Federal Columbia River resources, and facilitation of efficient, coordinated west coast development of generating resources. Federal Marketing and Joint Ventures meets need and serves purposes to a better degree than No Action. BPA considers Federal Marketing and Joint Ventures to be the environmentally preferable alternative in that it encourages long-term coordination of west coast generating resource development and operation. This provides the greatest opportunity to decrease generation of more environmentally harmful plants which would otherwise have greater effects on air, land, and water, and to avoid construction of new generation plants.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1994-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

300

Billy Shaw Dam and Reservoir : Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impacts.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This notice announces BPA`s decision to fund the construction, operation, and maintenance of the Billy Shaw Dam and Reservoir on the Duck Valley Reservation. This project is part of a continuing effort to address system-wide fish and wildlife losses caused by the development of the hydropower system in the Columbia River Basin. BPA has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) evaluating the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project. Based on the analysis in the EA, BPA has determined that the Proposed Action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. Therefore, the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required and BPA is issuing this FONSI.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration; Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation, Nevada.

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Microsoft Word - Final Mitigated Action Plan - CNMI.docx  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

| P | P a g e MITIGATION ACTION PLAN FOR THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE GREEN ENERGY SCHOOL WIND PROJECT SAIPAN, COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS U.S. Department of Energy Golden Service Center Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy DOE/EA-1923 2 | P a g e ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AMC Adaptive Management Committee CFR Code of Federal Regulations DOE U.S. Department of Energy EA environmental assessment ESA Endangered Species Act FONSI finding of no significant impacts MAP mitigation action plan NEPA National Environmental Policy Act USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 3 | P a g e 1.0 Introduction The United States Department of Energy (DOE) has issued a Final Environmental Assessment (EA) and a

302

Promoting greater Federal energy productivity [Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is a close-out report describing the work done under this DOE grant to improve Federal Energy Productivity. Over the four years covered in this document, the Alliance To Save Energy conducted liaison with the private sector through our Federal Energy Productivity Task Force. In this time, the Alliance held several successful workshops on the uses of metering in Federal facilities and other meetings. We also conducted significant research on energy efficiency, financing, facilitated studies of potential energy savings in energy intensive agencies, and undertook other tasks outlined in this report.

Hopkins, Mark; Dudich, Luther

2003-03-05T23:59:59.000Z

303

Action Items  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ACTION ITEMS ACTION ITEMS Presentation to the DOE High Level Waste Corporate Board July 29, 2009 Kurt Gerdes Office of Waste Processing DOE-EM Office of Engineering & Technology 2 ACTION ITEMS Action Item Status * Approve Performance Assessment Community of Practice Charter * Charter approved 13 July 2009 by majority vote of Board (balloting conducted by e- mail). * Report on first Performance Assessment Community of Practice meeting * Meeting held on 13-14 July 2009. Report by David Kosson, PhD, Vanderbilt University and CRESP * Update of Tank Waste Corporate Board Charter to include changes resulting from changes in Office of Environmental Management * In progress (pending completion of any reorganization) * Update of Performance Assessment Community of Practice Charter to include

304

30-Day Federal Register Notice - Proposed  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

30-Day Federal Register Notice - Proposed 30-Day Federal Register Notice - Proposed [6450-01-P] DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Proposed Agency Information Collection AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice and Request for OMB Review and Comment SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance, a proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed collection will {enter a brief description of the collection that highlights the major questions being asked; suggested length is 2 to 5 sentences}. DATES: Comments regarding this collection must be received on or before [INSERT DATE 30 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find it difficult

305

30-Day Federal Register Notice - Proposed  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

30-Day Federal Register Notice - Proposed 30-Day Federal Register Notice - Proposed [6450-01-P] DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Proposed Agency Information Collection AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice and Request for OMB Review and Comment SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance, a proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed collection will {enter a brief description of the collection that highlights the major questions being asked; suggested length is 2 to 5 sentences}. DATES: Comments regarding this collection must be received on or before [INSERT DATE 30 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find it difficult

306

Action Codes Table | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Action Codes Table | National Nuclear Security Administration Action Codes Table | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Action Codes Table Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nuclear Security > Nuclear Materials Management & Safeguards System > NMMSS Information, Reports & Forms > Code Tables > Action Codes Table

307

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT AND FERC STAFF The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today accepted a settlement, valued at nearly $500 stemming from the 2000-2001 energy crisis in California and other Western states. The global settlement

Laughlin, Robert B.

308

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT POWER EXCHANGE MARKET The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today approved a staff settlement calling-2-001 COMMISSION APPROVES $13.8 MILLION SETTLEMENT WITH RELIANT ENERGY OVER PHYSICAL WITHHOLDING IN CALIFORNIA

Laughlin, Robert B.

309

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today accepted an agreement between Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific. AGREEMENT ACCEPTED BETWEEN ENRON AND NEVADA COMPANIES SETTLING MATTERS STEMMING FROM WESTERN ENERGY CRISIS

Laughlin, Robert B.

310

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT FERC APPROVES SETTLEMENT WITH RELIANT IN CALIFORNIA CASES; PROCEEDS COULD TOTAL $50 MILLION The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today approved a settlement between the Commission's enforcement staff

Laughlin, Robert B.

311

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT CRISIS The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today approved a comprehensive settlement among APX Inc. Coral Power LLC, Puget Sound Energy Inc. and Avista are Supporting Parties. R-07-14 (30) #12;

Laughlin, Robert B.

312

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACTS al. COMMISSION ACCEPTS ENRON SETTLEMENT VALUED AT $1.5 BILLION The Federal Energy Regulatory-2001 Western energy crisis, said Commission Chairman Joseph T. Kelliher. "The parties are to be congratulated

Laughlin, Robert B.

313

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT-95-191 COMMISSION APPROVES TWO WESTERN POWER SETTLEMENTS The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today approved two markets during the Western energy crisis of 2000-2001. The first case involves a settlement agreement

Laughlin, Robert B.

314

Federal Technical Capability  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This directive defines requirements and responsibilities for meeting the Department of Energy (DOE) commitment to recruiting, deploying, developing, and retaining a technically competent workforce that will accomplish DOE missions in a safe and efficient manner through the Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP). Cancels DOE M 426.1-1A, Federal Technical Capability Manual.

2009-11-19T23:59:59.000Z

315

Federal Technical Capability Manual  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Federal Technical Capability Manual provides the process for the recruitment, deployment, development, and retention of Federal personnel with the demonstrated technical capability to safely accomplish the Departments missions and responsibilities at defense nuclear facilities. Canceled by DOE M 426.1-1A. Does not cancel other directives.

2000-06-05T23:59:59.000Z

316

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON,D.C.20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT JURISDICTION UNDER SECTION 1290 OF EPACT The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today approved a settlement, collectively valued at $6.4 billion, which the Commission has approved stemming from the California energy

Laughlin, Robert B.

317

Part 3: Removal Action | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3: Removal Action 3: Removal Action Part 3: Removal Action Question: When may removal actions be initiated? Answer: Removal actions may be initiated when DOE determines that the action will prevent, minimize, stabilize, or eliminate a risk to health or the environment. The NCP specifies that the determination that a risk to health or the environment is appropriate for removal action should be based on: actual or potential exposure of humans, animals, or the food chain the presence of contained hazardous substances that pose a threat of release the threat of migration of the hazardous substances the threat of fire or explosion the availability of an appropriate Federal or State response capability [section 300.415(b)(2)]. In essence, where DOE identifies a threat of exposure to or migration of

318

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

August 2012 Update to someone by August 2012 Update to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products August 2012 Update on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products August 2012 Update on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products August 2012 Update on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products August 2012 Update on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products August 2012 Update on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products August 2012 Update on

319

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

April 2012 Update to someone by April 2012 Update to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products April 2012 Update on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products April 2012 Update on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products April 2012 Update on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products April 2012 Update on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products April 2012 Update on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products April 2012 Update on

320

Finding of no significant impact shipment of stabilized mixed waste from the K-25 Site to an off-site commercial disposal facility, Oak Ridge K-25 Site, Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the shipment of stabilized mixed waste, removed from K-1407-B and -C ponds, to an off-site commercial disposal facility (Envirocare) for permanent land disposal. Based on the analysis in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. Therefore, the preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required, and DOE is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI).

NONE

1994-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

U.S. Department of Energy Finding of No Significant Impact  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact Reconstruction of the South Access Road (CR 802) in Support of the Department of Energy, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in Eddy County, New Mexico AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Carlsbad Field Office, has adopted an Environmental Assessment (EA) prepared by the U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Carlsbad Field Office for the reconstruction of the South Access Road for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) near Carlsbad, New Mexico. DOE currently operates WIPP as a disposal site for transuranic (TRU) waste and TRU-mixed waste containing hazardous chemical constituents generated by the nuclear defense activities of the federal government.

322

FEDERAL ASSISTANCE BUDGET INFORMATION (CONSTRUCTION) | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

FEDERAL ASSISTANCE BUDGET INFORMATION (CONSTRUCTION) FEDERAL ASSISTANCE BUDGET INFORMATION (CONSTRUCTION) Form provides information on the federal assistance budget for...

323

Electricity Advisory Committee - Federal Register Notices | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Federal Register Notices Electricity Advisory Committee - Federal Register Notices Electricity Advisory Committee - Federal Register Notices September 3, 2014 Electricity Advisory...

324

Southeastern Federal Power Alliance Meetings | Department of...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

About Us Southeastern Federal Power Alliance Southeastern Federal Power Alliance Meetings Southeastern Federal Power Alliance Meetings Meeting Documents Available for...

325

Federal Memorandum of Understanding for Hydropower/Federal Inland  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

source source History View New Pages Recent Changes All Special Pages Semantic Search/Querying Get Involved Help Apps Datasets Community Login | Sign Up Search Page Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon » Federal Memorandum of Understanding for Hydropower/Federal Inland Hydropower Working Group < Federal Memorandum of Understanding for Hydropower Jump to: navigation, search Federal Memorandum of Understanding for Hydropower Hydroelectric-collage2.jpg Home Federal Inland Hydropower Working Group Participating Agencies Resources Federal Inland Hydropower Working Group The Federal Inland Hydropower Working Group is made up of 15 federal entities involved in the regulation, management, or development of hydropower resources (including hydrokinetics) in rivers and streams of the

326

Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 340: Pesticide Release sites, Nevada Test Site, Nevada  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit 340, the NTS Pesticide Release Sites, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order of 1996 (FFACO, 1996). Corrective Action Unit 340 is located at the Nevada Test Site, Nevada, and is comprised of the following Corrective Action Sites: 23-21-01, Area 23 Quonset Hut 800 Pesticide Release Ditch; 23-18-03, Area 23 Skid Huts Pesticide Storage; and 15-18-02, Area 15 Quonset Hut 15-11 Pesticide Storage. The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document is to identify and provide a rationale for the selection of a recommended corrective action alternative for each Corrective Action Site. The scope of this Corrective Action Decision Document consists of the following tasks: Develop corrective action objectives; Identify corrective action alternative screening criteria; Develop corrective action alternatives; Perform detailed and comparative evaluations of the corrective action alternatives in relation to the corrective action objectives and screening criteria; and Recommend and justify a preferred corrective action alternative for each Corrective Action Site.

DOE /NV

1998-12-08T23:59:59.000Z

327

State-federal interactions in nuclear regulation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Atomic Energy Act of 1954 established, and later Congressional amendments have confirmed, that except in areas which have been explicitly granted to the states, the federal government possesses preemptive authority to regulate radiation hazards associated with the development and use of atomic energy. Since the passage of the original Act, numerous decisions by the courts have reaffirmed the legitimacy of federal preemption, and have defined and redefined its scope. In this study, the aim is to explore the underlying issues involved in federal preemption of radiation-hazard regulation, and to recommend actions that the Department of Energy and other agencies and groups should consider undertaking in the near term to protect the preemption principle. Appropriate roles of the states are discussed, as well as recent state-level activities and their rationale, and several current arenas in which state-federal conflicts about regulation of hazards are being played out. The emphasis here is on four particular arenas that are now important arenas of conflict, but the issues discussed are far broader in scope. These four arenas are: state-level moratorium activity; emergency planning for reactors; conflicts arising from state financial regulation; and inroads in federal preemption through litigation under state law.

Pasternak, A.D.; Budnitz, R.J.

1987-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

328

Sustainable Federal Fleets | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Fleets Sustainable Federal Fleets FEMP's Sustainable Federal Fleets website provides guidance and assistance to help implement Federal legislative and regulatory...

329

Showerhead Manufacturer Agrees to Civil Penalty to Resolve Enforcement Action  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Department of Energy has settled a civil penalty action it initiated against "Showerheadpower" for the manufacture and online sale of showerheads that used more water than allowed by federal...

330

DOE/EA-1605: Finding of No Significant Impact for the Environmental Assessment for Biomass Cogeneration and Heating Facilities at the Savannah River Site (August 2008)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Biomass Cogeneration and Heating Facilities at the Savannah River Site Agency: U.S. Department of Energy Action: Finding of No Significant Impact Summary: The Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-1605) to analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed construction and operation of new biomass cogeneration and heating facilities located at the Savannah River Site (SRS). The draft EA was made available to the States of South Carolina and Georgia, and to the public, for a 30-day comment period. Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. Therefore, the

331

Finding of No Significant Impacts  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE/EA 1916 DOE/EA 1916 Finding of No Significant Impacts Page 2 of 6 system; and (6) appurtenant facilities for navigation safety and operation. The project is estimated to have an annual generation of 1.25 gigawatt-hours (GWh) after the completion of Phase 2. Because the project would be connected to the existing electrical grid, on September 1, 2011, ORPC Maine applied to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for an 8-year pilot project license to construct, operate, and maintain the proposed Cobscook Bay project (FERC Project No. 12711), This application required FERC to conduct a review of the potential environmental impacts of the project in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Since DOE was considering providing financial assistance for the project, DOE

332

Integrating local action elements for action analysis  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

In this paper, we propose a framework for human action analysis from video footage. A video action sequence in our perspective is a dynamic structure of sparse local spatial-temporal patches termed action elements, so the problems of action analysis ... Keywords: Action classification, Action distance function, Action matching, Action retrieval, Generalized Hough Transform, Implicit Shape Model, Multi-dimensional density estimation, Sparse Bayesian classifier, Spatial temporal feature

Tuan Hue Thi; Li Cheng; Jian Zhang; Li Wang; Shinichi Satoh

2012-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

333

Federal Energy Capabilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Energy Capabilities Federal Energy Capabilities Federal Energy Capabilities MCKINSTRY'S CYCLE OF SERVICES PROGRAM SERVICES McKinstry is dedicated to excellence in design, construction, and facilities operation. We strive to develop innovative, cost effective facility solutions for you. Below are the services we can deliver under our energy services program: * Design-Build MEDP contracting * Energy savings performance contracting * Smart Building System integration * Demand response * Smart metering to Smart Grid solutions * Advanced metering services * Renewable energy systems * Cogeneration/combined heat power * Creative tax credit and green tags/white tags * ESCO preventative maintenance APPROACH * No premium for the energy services delivery * Open book pricing and guaranteed

334

Federal Activities in the Bioeconomy  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Plenary V: Federal Activities in the Bioeconomy Federal Activities in the Bioeconomy Zia Haq, Senior Analyst, Technology Manager, Bioenergy Technologies Office, U.S. Department of Energy

335

Federal Energy Management Success Stories  

Energy Savers [EERE]

6 Federal Energy Management Success Stories en FEMP Helps Federal Facilities Develop Large-Scale Renewable Energy Projects http:energy.goveeresuccess-storiesarticles...

336

Increasing Federal Office Building Water Efficiency, Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) (Fact Sheet)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Order 13514 requires a two percent annual reduction in water use (compared to Order 13514 requires a two percent annual reduction in water use (compared to a FY 2007 baseline), significantly reducing total Federal water consumption by FY 2020. View Federal water requirements at www.femp.energy.gov/program/waterefficiency_ requirements.html. Increasing Federal Office Building Water Efficiency With less than one percent of Earth's water available for human use, the Federal Government is leading by example with water efficiency and conservation efforts. Federal laws and regulations require agencies to implement water efficiency efforts and reduce water consumption, making water an integral part of every comprehensive resource management program. Water Management Planning A comprehensive water management plan includes clear information on

337

Federal Energy Management Program: Water Efficiency Basics  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Basics Basics Graphic of the eTraining logo Training Available Managing Water Assessment in Federal Facilities: Learn how to manage the Water Assessment process in Federal facilities by taking this FEMP eTraining course. Although two-thirds of the Earth's surface is water, less than one-half of one percent of that water is currently available for our use. As the U.S. population increases, so does our water use, making water resources increasingly scarce. Many regions feel the strain. The Federal Government uses an estimated 148 to 165 billion gallons of potable water annually. This is equal to the annual water use of a state the size of New Jersey or almost 8 million people1. This is, in part, because water requires significant energy input for treatment, pumping, heating, and process uses. Water is integral to the cooling of power plants that provide energy to Federal facilities.

338

Finding of No Significant Impact for the Offsite Transportation of Certain Low-Level and Mixed Radioactive Waste from Savannah River Site for Treatment and Disposal at Commercial and Government Facilities, DOE/EA-1308 (02/15/01)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact for the Offsite Transportation of Certain Low-level and Mixed Radioactive Waste from the Savannah River Site for Treatment and Disposal at Commercial and Government Facilities Agency: U. S. Department of Energy Action: Finding of No Significant Impact Summary: The Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-1308) to analyze the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed offsite transportation of certain low-level radioactive waste (LLW) and mixed (i.e., hazardous and radioactive) low-level radioactive waste (MLLW) from the Savannah River Site (SRS), located near Aiken, South Carolina. Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE has determined that the action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting

339

Federal Employee Health Services  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To establish requirements and responsibilities for occupational medical, employee assistance, and workers' compensation programs for Federal employees. Cancels DOE 3790.1B. Canceled by DOE O 341.1A.

2003-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

340

Federal Protective Force  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Manual establishes requirements for the management and operation of the Department of Energy (DOE) Federal protective forces (FPFs). Cancels DOE M 470.4-3, Chg 1. Canceled by DOE O 473.3.

2009-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Dividing the Federal Pie  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The Federal BY L E W I S O N LEE Pie LEM T his year Congressprograms for the portation pie. next six years. A criticalFund revenues, which come of the pie — they attract m u c h

Lem, Lewison Lee

1997-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

342

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Request for Information seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal authorizations. This notice announces an extension of the public comment period for submitting comments regarding the IIP Process to October 31, 2013. Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting

343

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Request for Information seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal authorizations. This notice announces an extension of the public comment period for submitting comments regarding the IIP Process to October 31, 2013. Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting

344

Established and Revised Federal Agency NEPA Procedures, 2000 - 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

and Revised Federal Agency NEPA Procedures, 2000 - 2011 and Revised Federal Agency NEPA Procedures, 2000 - 2011 ` Established and Revised Federal Agency NEPA Procedures Last Updated on January 11, 2013 Department/Agency Action Title/Citation Federal Register Notice(s) 2000 Department of Health and Human Services Revised NEPA Procedures Revised General Administration Manual, HHS Part 30, Environmental Protection Published for comment on January 11, 1999 (64 Federal Register [FR] 1655). Published as final procedures on February 25, 2000 (65 FR 10229). Bureau of Reclamation Department of the Interior Notice of Availability of a Draft Agency Handbook on the National Environmental Policy Act Department Manual (DM) Part 516, Chapter 6: Managing the NEPA Process (Appendix 7) Published on April 20, 2000 (65 FR 21210) with

345

EA-1290: Disposition of Russian Federation Titled Natural Uranium |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

290: Disposition of Russian Federation Titled Natural Uranium 290: Disposition of Russian Federation Titled Natural Uranium EA-1290: Disposition of Russian Federation Titled Natural Uranium SUMMARY This EA evaluates the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to transport up to an average of 9,000 metric tons per year of natural uranium as uranium hexafluoride (UF6) from the United States to the Russian Federation. This amount of uranium is equivalent to 13,3000 metric tons of UF6. The EA also examines the impacts of this action on the global commons. Transfer of natural UF6 to the Russian Federation is part of a joint U.S./Russian program to dispose of highly enriched uranium (HEU) from dismantled Russian nuclear weapons. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD

346

Recovery Act Federal Register Notices | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Information Center » Recovery Act » Recovery Act Federal Register Information Center » Recovery Act » Recovery Act Federal Register Notices Recovery Act Federal Register Notices October 12, 2011 Federal Register Notice (PDF Version) on the DOE's invitation for public comment on its request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to extend for three years the Information Collection Request Title: OE Recovery Act Financial Assistance Grants, OMB Control No. 1910-5149 that DOE is developing for submission to OMB pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Comments due on or before November 7, 2011. OMB Form 83-I. ICR Supporting Statement. SGIG Reporting Guidance. Notice of OMB Action (January 10, 2012): OMB has approved DOE's request to extend information collection for three years. August 10, 2011 Federal Register Notice (PDF Version ) on the DOE's invitation for

347

Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practicee on Federal Landscaped Grounds  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

W W A S H I N G T O N April 26, 1994 MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES SUBJECT: Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practicee on Federal Landscaped Grounds The Report of the National Performance Review contains recommendations for a series of environmental actions, including one to increase environmentally and economically beneficial landscaping practices at Federal facilities and federally funded project.. Environmentally beneficial landscaping entail. utilizing techniques that complement and enhance the local environment and seek to minimize the adverse effects that the landscaping will have on it. In particular, this means using regionally native plants and employing landscaping practices and technologies that conserve water

348

EuropeanEuropean PanelPanel FederationFederation  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

EuropeanEuropean PanelPanel FederationFederation viewpointviewpoint onon sustainablesustainable woodwood energyenergy policiespolicies #12;EuropeanEuropean PanelPanel FederationFederation Members energy for manufacturingfor manufacturing ·· Wood products are anWood products are an energy source

349

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partnership Working Group The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) establishes partnerships and facilitates communications among Federal agencies, utilities, and energy service companies. The group develops strategies to implement cost-effective energy efficiency and water conservation projects through utility incentive programs at Federal sites. The mission and objectives of the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group are to: Enhance existing or foster new partnerships between Federal agencies and their servicing utilities to identify, develop, and implement cost-effective energy efficiency, water conservation, and renewable energy projects at Federal sites Identify how utilities can help Federal agencies meet energy management goals required by legislation

350

Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands (216(h)) |  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands (216(h)) Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands (216(h)) Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands (216(h)) On October 23, 2009, the Department of Energy and eight other Federal agencies entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to improve coordination among project applicants, federal agencies, states and tribes involved in the siting and permitting process for electric transmission facilities on Federal land. The MOU will improve uniformity, consistency, and transparency by describing each entity's role and responsibilities when project applicants wish to build electric transmission facilities. Additionally, the MOU designates a "Lead Agency" serving as the single point-of-contact for coordinating all federal environmental reviews

351

EA-1807: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Impact EA-1807: Finding of No Significant Impact Heartland Community College Wind Energy Project, Normal, McLean County, Illinois The Department of Energy's proposed action...

352

EA-1804: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Impact EA-1804: Finding of No Significant Impact Sauk Valley Community College's Wind Energy Project, Dixon, Lee County, Illinois The Department of Energy's proposed action is...

353

EA-1969: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Impact Clark Fork River Delta Restoration Project, Bonner County, Idaho Bonneville Power Administration issued a Finding of No Significant Impact and Mitigation Action Plan...

354

EA-1759: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Impact EA-1759: Finding of No Significant Impact Southwest Alaska Regional Geothermal Energy Project, Naknek, Alaska The Department of Energy is proposing an action to fund...

355

EA-1652: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EA-1652: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1885: Finding of No Significant Impact Boston Massachusetts: Solar in Action (Brochure), Solar America Cities, Energy Efficiency &...

356

EA-1729: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

of No Significant Impact Removal Actions at the Technical Area III Classified Waste Landfill, Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico The environmental assessment analyses the...

357

EA-1591: Final Environmental Assessment, Finding of No Significant...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Assessment, Finding of No Significant Impact, and Mitigation Action Plan Palisades-Goshen Transmission Line Reconstruction Project This revision sheet documents the changes...

358

EA-1588: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

of No Significant Impact Sacramento Municipal Utility District 230-kV Folsom Dam Transmission Line Relocation SMUD's proposed action consists of the removal and relocation of a...

359

Energy-Efficient Product Procurement for Federal Agencies (Brochure), Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

* EPAct 2005 mandates Federal agen- * EPAct 2005 mandates Federal agen- cies to incorporate energy efficiency criteria into relevant contracts and specifications. * The Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007 [amend- ing NECPA Section 8259b], E.O. 13423, and E.O. 13221 require Federal agencies to purchase energy- consuming products with a low standby power level of 1 watt or less. * E.O. 13514 requires 95 percent of new contract actions, task orders, and delivery orders for products and services to be energy efficient, water efficient, bio-based, envi- ronmentally preferable [Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool (EPEAT) certified], non-ozone depleting, contain recycled content, or non-toxic or less toxic alternatives where such products meet agency performance requirements.

360

Energy-Efficient Product Procurement for Federal Agencies (Brochure), Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

EPAct 2005 mandates Federal agen- EPAct 2005 mandates Federal agen- cies to incorporate energy efficiency criteria into relevant contracts and specifications. * The Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007 [amend- ing NECPA Section 8259b], E.O. 13423, and E.O. 13221 require Federal agencies to purchase energy- consuming products with a low standby power level of 1 watt or less. * E.O. 13514 requires 95 percent of new contract actions, task orders, and delivery orders for products and services to be energy efficient, water efficient, bio-based, envi- ronmentally preferable [Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool (EPEAT) certified], non-ozone depleting, contain recycled content, or non-toxic or less toxic alternatives where such products meet agency performance requirements.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Microsoft Word - 8-7-08 URTAC Federal Regiser Notice of Meeting Sept 11, 2008  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Register: August 5, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 151)] Federal Register: August 5, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 151)] [Notices] [Page 45430] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr05au08-39] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Unconventional Resources Technology Advisory Committee AGENCY: Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy. ACTION: Notice of open meeting. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Unconventional Resources Technology Advisory Committee. Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that notice of these meetings be announced in the Federal Register.

362

Federal Acquisition Regulation Federal Acquisition Circular 59  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

59 59 Item Subject FAR Case ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I. Prohibition on Contracting With Inverted Domestic Corporations 2012-013 II. Free Trade Agreement--Colombia 2012-012 III. Revision of Cost Accounting Standards Threshold 2012-003 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- These rules were published in the Federal Register on May 10, 2012 at 77 FR 27546 Item I--Prohibition on Contracting With Inverted Domestic Corporations This interim rule implements section 738 of Division C of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012 (Pub. L. 112-74), which prohibits the award of contracts using Fiscal Year 2012 appropriated funds to any foreign incorporated entity that is treated as

363

Federal Energy Management Program: Metering  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Metering to Metering to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Metering on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Metering on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Metering on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Metering on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Metering on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Metering on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Operations & Maintenance Federal Requirements Program Management Commissioning Metering Systems Approaches Process Computerized Maintenance Management Systems Maintenance Types Major Equipment Types Resources Contacts Greenhouse Gases Water Efficiency Data Center Energy Efficiency Industrial Facilities

364

Ecologically Significant Wetlands  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Ecologically Significant Wetlands in the Flathead, Stillwater, and Swan River Valleys FINAL REPORT Also: Ecologically Significant Wetlands in the North Fork of the Flathead River Valley Appendix 29b #12;Ecologically Significant Wetlands in the Flathead, Stillwater, and Swan River Valleys JUNE 1, 1999 DEQ

365

Federal Real Property Council Guidance  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Real Property Council Federal Real Property Council Guidance for Improved Asset Management December 22, 2004 Federal Real Property Council Guidance for Improved Asset Management Table of Contents I. Overview............................................................................. 1 II. Guiding Principles .................................................................... 3 III. Asset Management Plan - Required Components............................... 4 IV. Asset Management Plan - "Shelf Document".................................. 5 V. Inventory Data Elements and Performance Measures Definitions.......... 26 i Federal Real Property Council Guidance for Improved Asset Management I. Overview On February 4, 2004, President Bush signed Executive Order 13327, "Federal Real Property

366

Memorandum for Federal NEPA Contacts: Emergency Actions and NEPA  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This Council on Environmental Quality memorandum provides general information on (1) the response to hurricane Katrina; (2) reporting oil and chemical spills; (3) projected long term recovery efforts; and (4) how agencies can respond to emergencies and comply with NEPA.

367

Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address Environmental...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

and with State, local, and tribal governments. Sec. 4-4. Subsistence Consumption of Fish and Wildlife. 4-401. Consumption Patterns. In order to assist in identifying the need...

368

Climate Change Adaptation: A Collective Action Perspective on Federalism Considerations  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

adaptation to minimize the adverse effects of climate change. Climate change adaptation is designed to increase the resilience of natural and human ecosystems to the threats posed by a changing environment. Although an extensive literature concerning...

Glicksman, Robert L.; Levy, Richard E.

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

369

Federal-Tribal Partnership on Climate Change Action Rounds Corner...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

David Conrad Acting Director - Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs The 2013 White House Tribal Nations Conference, held Wednesday, November 13 at the Department of the...

370

Federal Railroad Administration  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Legislation Legislation Kevin R. Blackwell FRA Hazmat Division Washington, DC Federal Railroad Safety Accountability and Improvement Act of 2007 (FRSAIA)-H.R. 1516 /S. 918 DOT supports this reauthorization bill over H.R. 2095 The provisions of H.R. 2095, while not exactly the same, are very similar to this bill in regard to the core provisions Core provisions: Review and reform the Federal hours of service requirements Establish a new risk reduction program alongside the current existing safety program, and Mandate reporting by States and railroads to the DOT's National Crossing Inventory Federal Railroad Safety Improvement Act of 2007 (FRSIA) - H.R. 2095 Letter from DOT's General Counsel's office addressing DOT's

371

Federal Railroad Administration  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Transportation Transportation Federal Railroad Administration Overview of Proposed Rail Safety & Security Rulemakings Kevin R. Blackwell FRA Hazmat Division Washington, DC Federal Authority DOT Authority to regulate safety and security of hazardous materials transportation Hazardous Materials Transportation Law (49 U.S.C. 5101 et.seq.) Federal Railroad Safety Act (49 U.S.C. 20101 et.seq.) TSA Authority to regulate security of hazardous material transportation Aviation Transportation Security Act (Pub. L. 107-71, 115 Stat. 597) Routing as a Part of the Transportation Cycle Routing decisions are continually made as a part of the transportation cycle for a variety of reasons. E c o n o m i c s Security S a f e t y Routing Decision Pyramid DOT NPRM HM-232E NPRM published on December 21, 2006.

372

Federal Metering Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Metering Requirements Metering Requirements FUPWG - May 23, 2013 Brad Gustafson Federal Energy Management Program 2 42 USC 8253 - ENERGY MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENT (e) Metering By October 1, 2012, in accordance with guidelines established by the Secretary under paragraph (2), all Federal buildings shall, for the purposes of efficient use of energy and reduction in the cost of electricity used in such buildings, be metered. Each agency shall use, to the maximum extent practicable, advanced meters or advanced metering devices that provide data at least daily and that measure at least hourly consumption of electricity in the Federal buildings of the agency. Not later than October 1, 2016, each agency shall provide for equivalent metering of natural gas and steam, in accordance with guidelines established by the Secretary

373

Notices ACTION: Notice of Open Teleconference Meeting.  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

05 Federal Register 05 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 160 / Monday, August 19, 2013 / Notices ACTION: Notice of Open Teleconference Meeting. SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee (ASCAC). The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of these meetings be announced in the Federal Register. DATES: Tuesday, September 3, 2013, 12:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. ADDRESSES: The meeting is open to the public. To access the call: 1. Dial Toll-Free Number: 866-740- 1260 (U.S. & Canada) 2. International participants dial: http://www.readytalk.com/intl 3. Enter access code 8083012, followed by ''#'' To ensure we have sufficient access lines for the public, we request that members of the public notify the DFO,

374

Finding of No Significant Impact for the Construction and Operation of the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC), California (DOE/EA-1426) (2/28/03)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Finding of No Significant Impact Construction and Operation of the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC), California. AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA), DOE/EA-1426, evaluating the proposed action to construct and operate the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC). Based upon the information and analyses in the EA, the DOE has determined that the proposed federal action does not significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.

375

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Federal Facility Agreement, June 29, 1992 Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Site 300) Site 300) Agreement Name Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Federal Facility Agreement Under CERCLA Section 120, June 29, 1992 State California Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, implementing, and monitoring appropriate response actions at the Site Parties DOE; USEPA; California Department of Toxic Substances Control; Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board Date 6/29/1992 SCOPE * Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, implementing, and monitoring appropriate response actions at the Site. * Identify operable units (OUs) which are appropriate at the Site prior to the implementation of final remedial action(s).

376

The U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) jointly submitted to Congress a required "Implementation Proposal for The National Action Plan on Demand Response." The U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) jointly submitted to Congress a required "Implementation Proposal for The National Action Plan on Demand Response." August 1, 2011 - 1:59pm Addthis The U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) jointly submitted to Congress a required "Implementation Proposal for The National Action Plan on Demand Response." Addthis Related Articles Implementation Proposal for The National Action Plan on Demand Response DOE and FERC Joint Public Statement on Back Stop Siting

377

AGENCY LEVEL PROTEST PROCEDURES Federal Register: April 6, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 65)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

AGENCY LEVEL PROTEST PROCEDURES Federal Register: April 6, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 65)] [Rules; Agency Protest Procedures AGENCY: Department of Commerce. ACTION: Final rule, Section 103, to include ``Agency Protest Procedures-Level Above the Contracting Officer.'' The Department

378

Performing Energy Security Assessments- A How-To Guide for Federal Facility Managers  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Guide describes the best practices and recommended process for federal facility managers to prepare for the following sections of a facility’s energy security plan: vulnerability assessments, energy preparedness and operations plans, and remedial action plans.

379

Federal Railroad Administration  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE TRANSPORTATION EXTERNAL WORKING GROUP MEETING Pueblo, CO. September 20, 2005 Presented by Kevin R. Blackwell Radioactive Materials/Hazardous Materials Specialist Federal Railroad Administration - HQ Hazmat Division, Washington, DC. Federal Railroad Administration Dedicated Train Study - Report to Congress November 2003 - FRA' s Ofc. Of Research & Development (RDV), as lead on the Dedicated Train Study (DTS), received draft final report from the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (VNTSC), the contractor conducting the study. February, 2004 - FRA completed review of DFR and submitted editorial corrections back to VNTSC. Final draft of the DTS with editorial corrections received from VNTSC in February, 2004. March to September 2004 -

380

EXPLANATION OF SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

EXPLANATION OF SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES EXPLANATION OF SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES WELDON SPRING SITE February 2005 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management FINAL: ESD Weldon Spring Site February 2005 1 EXPLANATION OF SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES WELDON SPRING SITE I Introduction This document is an Explanation of Significant Differences (ESD) for three Records of Decision (RODs) for the Weldon Spring site located in St. Charles County, Missouri. These RODs were signed by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The RODs addressed by this ESD are the following: * Chemical Plant Operable Unit (CPOU) ROD, signed in September 1993. This ROD

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Federal Energy Management Program: News  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PROJECT FUNDING PROJECT FUNDING TECHNOLOGIES SERVICES NEWS & EVENTS EERE » Federal Energy Management Program » News & Events Site Map Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Federal Energy Management Program: News to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: News on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: News on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: News on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: News on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: News on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: News on AddThis.com... News Events News Subscribe to RSS News Feed RSS Feed icon January 13, 2014 FEMP Offers New Advanced eTraining on UESCs The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Federal Energy Management Program

382

Corrective Action Plan for Corrective Action Unit 151: Septic Systems and Discharge Area, Nevada Test Site, Nevada  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 151, Septic Systems and Discharge Area, is listed in the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) of 1996 (FFACO, 1996). CAU 151 consists of eight Corrective Action Sites (CASs) located in Areas 2, 12, and 18 of the Nevada Test Site (NTS), which is located approximately 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada.

NSTec Environmental Restoration

2007-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

383

Federal Acquisition Regulation; Federal Acquisition Circular  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2005-37; Introduction Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005-37 List of Rules in FAC 2005-37 Item Subject I. Registry of Disaster Response Contractors II. Limiting Length of Noncompetitive Contracts in "Unusual and Compelling Urgency" Circumstances III. GAO Access to Contractor Employees IV. Use of Commercial Services Item Authority V. Limitations on Pass-Through Charges VI. Award Fee Language Revision VII. National Response Framework VIII. Technical Amendments SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Summaries for each FAR rule follow. Item I-Registry of Disaster Response Contractors (FAR Case 2008-035) This interim rule amends the FAR at parts 2, 4, 7, 10, 13, 18, 26, and 52 to implement the Registry of Disaster Response Contractors provision, section 697 of the Department of

384

Federal Facility Agreement for the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Facility Agreement for the Paducah Gaseous Federal Facility Agreement for the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant State Kentucky Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA/RCRA Scope Summary Ensure that the environmental impacts of activities at the Site are investigated and appropriate response actions are taken. Parties U.S. DOE; Kentucky Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Cabinet; U.S. EPA Date 2/01/1998 SCOPE * Ensure all releases of hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants are addressed to achieve comprehensive remediation of the site. * Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, implementing, and monitoring response actions in accordance with CERCLA, RCRA, and Kentucky Law. * Facilitate cooperation, exchange of information, and participation of the Parties and

385

Federal Laboratory Technology Transfer  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Federal Laboratory Technology Transfer Fiscal Year 2009 Prepared by: National Institute to submit this fiscal year 2009 Technology Transfer Summary Report to the President and the Congress in accordance with 15 USC Sec 3710(g)(2) for an annual summary on the implementation of technology transfer

Perkins, Richard A.

386

Federal Laboratory Technology Transfer  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Federal Laboratory Technology Transfer Fiscal Year 2008 Prepared by: National Institute to submit this fiscal year 2008 Technology Transfer Summary Report to the President and the Congress transfer authorities established by the Technology Transfer Commercialization Act of 2000 (P.L. 106

Perkins, Richard A.

387

632 Appendix Federal Infonnation  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

632 Appendix Federal Infonnation Processing Standards Publication 46 1977 JanuW)' 15 ANNOUNCING. d.,~ !oh)' II. 1973). and P." 6 of Tit\\rCt·Rl. Name (If Standard with a key. The key is generated in such a way that each of the 56 bits used directly by the algori~hrn an' r

Holden, Joshua Brandon

388

Federal Employee Training  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To plan and establish requirements and assign responsibilities for Department of Energy (DOE) Federal employee training, education, and development (hereafter referred to as "training") under the Government Employees Training Act of 1958. Cancels DOE O 360.1A. Canceled by DOE O 360.1C.

2001-10-11T23:59:59.000Z

389

Federal Employee Training  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To plan and establish requirements and assign responsibilities for Department of Energy (DOE) Federal employee training, education, and development under the Government Employees Training Act of 1958, as amended. Cancels DOE O 360.1. Canceled by DOE O 360.1B.

1999-09-21T23:59:59.000Z

390

Federal Employee Training  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Order establishes requirements and responsibilities for DOE Federal employee training in accordance with Chapter 41 of Title 5, United States Code (U.S.C.). Cancels DOE O 360.1B and DOE M 360.1-1B.

2011-07-06T23:59:59.000Z

391

Federal Technical Capability  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To define requirements and responsibilities for meeting the Department of Energy (DOE) commitment to recruiting, deploying, developing, and retaining a technically competent workforce that will accomplish DOE missions in a safe and efficient manner through the Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP). Chg. 1 dated 9-20-11 Cancels DOE O 426.1. Cancels DOE P 426.1.

2009-11-19T23:59:59.000Z

392

Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Information on Improving Performance of Federal Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 168 - August 29, 2013 Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 168 - August 29, 2013 The Department of Energy's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, in collaboration with the Member Agencies of the Steering Committee (Member Agencies) created under Executive Order 13604 of March 22, 2012, and pursuant to the June 7, 2013 Transmission Presidential Memorandum, is seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal Authorization(s).

393

Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities October 4, 2013 - 4:41pm Addthis The Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities provides significant financial evidence from research findings and case studies that sustainable design is a smart business choice. The 20-page brochure and the full document provide data and information indicating that sustainable design does not have to increase first costs and yields economic, social, and environmental benefits to building owners and society. Read the Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities brochure. Download the Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities full document. Contact For additional information about the Business Case for Sustainable Design

394

Federal Technology Deployment Pilot: Exterior Solid State Lighting  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Technology Deployment Federal Technology Deployment Pilot: Exterior Solid State Lighting Jeff McCullough, LC October 24, 2011 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, Washington 2 | FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM femp.energy.gov * Overview of DOE's Solid-State Lighting Program * Federal Technology Deployment Pilot: Exterior Solid State Lighting * FEMP Technology Deployment Matrix This Morning's Topics 3 | FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM femp.energy.gov Energy Savings Potential of Solid-State Lighting SSL Multi-Year Program Plan, May 2011: http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/publications/pdfs/ssl/ssl_mypp2011_web.pdf 4 | FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM femp.energy.gov A Market in Motion * Tsunami of new products coming to market * Significant learning curve for

395

MEMORANDUM FOR FEDERAL PROCUREMENT DIRECTORS FROM: DIRECTOR  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2009 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR FEDERAL PROCUREMENT DIRECTORS FROM: DIRECTOR OFFICE OF PROCUREMENT AND ASSISTANCE MANAGEMENT SUBJECT: Changes to the Balanced Scorecard Program The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) performance management methodology has played a significant role in helping the Office of Procurement and Assistance Management assess the performance of the Department's Federal procurement offices and the purchasing organizations of its major site and facility contractors. This methodology provides the conceptual framework for creating, communicating, collecting and arraying performance objectives, measures, targets, and initiatives. Over the years, we have used the BSC assessment results to identify and monitor desired organizational changes, to expose problem areas needing management attention, to

396

Federal Memorandum of Understanding for Hydropower/Federal Inland...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

of Energy Environmental Protection Agency Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Fish and Wildlife Service Forest Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration...

397

LM Significant Environmental Aspects  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

LM evaluates all of our activities for their potential impact on the environment, and identifies those aspects that could have a significant impact if they were not controlled. This information is...

398

Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products August 2012 Update |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 2012 Update August 2012 Update Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products August 2012 Update October 22, 2013 - 11:17am Addthis Welcome to the sixth issue of Federal Energy-Efficient Product Procurement! This bi-monthly update helps Federal procurement officials, facility managers, and others remain up to date on events, training, technology, and changes to acquisition requirements. What do you think? Your feedback is very important to us. To subscribe, submit articles, suggest topics, or give us your feedback, contact Amanda Sahl. For more information about energy-efficient product procurement, visit femp.energy.gov/procurement. In This Issue: Commit to Efficiency for Energy Action Month Low Standby Product List Updates End of Year Procurement Purchasing Pathways Nominate Your Building for the 2013 Better Buildings Federal Award

399

Energy Corridors on Federal Lands  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

To improve energy delivery and enhance the electric transmission grid for the future, several government agencies currently are working together to establish a coordinated network of Federal energy corridors on Federal lands throughout the United States.

400

Federal Flood Risk Management Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Federal Flood Risk Management Standard builds upon Executive Order (E.O.) 11988 and is to be incorporated into existing Federal department and agency processes used to implement E.O. 11988.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Meeting Federal Energy Security Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation—given at at the Fall 2012 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meeting—discusses the opportunity to increase the scope of federal-utility partnerships for meeting energy security requirements.

402

Federal Laboratory Consortium | The Ames Laboratory  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Laboratory Consortium The Federal Laboratory Consortium for Technology Transfer (FLC) is the nationwide network of federal laboratories that provides the forum to develop...

403

Federal Agency NEPA Procedures | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Agency NEPA Procedures Federal Agency NEPA Procedures Each Federal agency is required to develop NEPA procedures that supplement the CEQ Regulations. Developed in...

404

Federal Buildings Supplemental Survey - Index Page  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

3 Federal Buildings 1993 Federal Buildings Supplemental Survey Overview Full Report Tables Energy usage and energy costs, by building characteristics, for federally-owned buildings...

405

Federal Interagency Geothermal Activities 2011 | Department of...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Interagency Geothermal Activities 2011 Federal Interagency Geothermal Activities 2011 This document is the federal interagency geothermal activities document for 2011,...

406

Federal Greenhouse Gas Inventories and Performance | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Federal Greenhouse Gas Inventories and Performance Federal Greenhouse Gas Inventories and Performance The Federal Energy Management Program provides performance data illustrating...

407

EA-1497: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

97: Finding of No Significant Impact 97: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1497: Finding of No Significant Impact Strategic Petroleum Reserve West Hackberry Facility Raw Water Intake Pipeline Replacement, Cameron and Calcasieu Parishes, Louisiana DOE has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA), DOE/EA-1497, for the proposed replacement of the existing 107 centimeter (cm) [42 inch (in)] 6.87 kilometer (km) [4.27 mile (mi)] raw water intake pipeline (RWIPL). This action is necessary to allow for continued, optimum operations at the West Hackberry facility (main site/facility). The EA described the proposed action (including action alternatives) and three alternatives to the proposed action. The EA evaluated only the potential environmental consequences of the proposed action (one action alternative), and

408

Mound Plant Federal Facility Agreement, July 15, 1993 Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

United States Environmental Protection Agency Region V United States Environmental Protection Agency Region V and the State of Ohio Federal Facility Agreement State Ohio Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary DOE shall identify Interim Remedial Actions (IRAs) alternatives and implement US EPA and OEPA approved remedies for the site in accordance with CERCLA Parties EPA; Ohio EPA (OEPA); DOE Date 07/15/1993 SCOPE * Identify Interim Remedial Action (IRA) alternatives which include Remedial Investigations (RI) and Feasibility Studies (FS); design and implement US EPA and OEPA approved remedies for the Mound site in accordance with CERCLA. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * After approval of remedial design and action plans, DOE shall prepare and provide to U.S. EPA and OEPA written monthly progress reports.

409

Federal Incentives for Water Power  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This factsheet lists some of the major federal incentives for water power technologies available as of April 2014.

410

Greening Federal Facilities: An Energy, Environmental, and Economic Resource Guide for Federal Facility Managers and Designers; Second Edition  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Greening Federal Facilities, Second Edition, is a nuts-and-bolts resource guide compiled to increase energy and resource efficiency, cut waste, and improve the performance of Federal buildings and facilities. The guide highlights practical actions that facility managers, design and construction staff, procurement officials, and facility planners can take to save energy and money, improve the comfort and productivity of employees, and benefit the environment. It supports a national effort to promote energy and environmental efficiency in the nation's 500,000 Federal buildings and facilities. Topics covered include current Federal regulations; environmental and energy decision-making; site and landscape issues; building design; energy systems; water and wastewater; materials; waste management, and recycling; indoor environmental quality; and managing buildings.

Wilson, A.

2001-05-16T23:59:59.000Z

411

Federal Presence in Newfoundland and  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

with the national levels Primary reliance on Statistics Canada data Objective: to inform the debate #12;II Employment Federal Government employment Overall Military Executives Federal Government Business Enterprises employment #12;Figure 7 Federal Government Employment Newfoundland and Labrador, 1981-2005 0 2

deYoung, Brad

412

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FOR THE NECO (HAXTUN) WIND ENERGY PROJECT  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NECO (HAXTUN) WIND ENERGY PROJECT NECO (HAXTUN) WIND ENERGY PROJECT LOGAN AND PHILLIPS COUNTIES, COLORADO DOE/EA-1812 AGENCY: U.S . Department of Energy, Western Area Power Administration ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact SUMMARY: Western Area Power Administration (Western) is a power marketing administration in the U.S . Department of Energy (DOE). The DOE Golden Field Office (Golden Field Office) provided Federal funding appropriated under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 to Phillips County under the Community Renewable Energy Development Program (CRED). ·Phillips County proposes to use $2.55 million in CRED funding to facilitate and paiiially fund the design, permitting, and construction of the Haxtun Wind Project (now called the NECO Wind Project). The proposed project is an approximately

413

Federal Railroad Administration  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Safety & Security Safety & Security Rulemakings Kevin R. Blackwell FRA Hazmat Division Washington, DC Federal Authority DOT Authority to regulate safety and security of hazardous materials transportation Hazardous Materials Transportation Law (49 U.S.C. 5101 et.seq.) Federal Railroad Safety Act (49 U.S.C. 20101 et.seq.) TSA Authority to regulate security of hazardous material transportation Aviation Transportation Security Act (Pub. L. 107-71, 115 Stat. 597) Routing as a Part of the Transportation Cycle Routing decisions are continually made as a part of the transportation cycle for a variety of reasons. Security Routing Decision Pyramid DOT NPRM HM-232E NPRM published on December 21, 2006. Seeks to clarify and enhance existing regulations. Rail Carriers who transport carloads of more than 5000 lbs of 1.1, 1.2, or 1.3

414

Related Federal Climate Efforts  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Related Federal Climate Efforts Print E-mail Related Federal Climate Efforts Print E-mail Interagency Task Force on Carbon Capture and Storage The Interagency Task Force on Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is a group of technologies for capturing, compressing, transporting and permanently storing power plant and industrial source emissions of carbon dioxide. Rapid development and deployment of clean coal technologies, particularly CCS, will help position the United States as a leader in the global clean energy race. Climate Change Adaptation Task Force The Task Force's work has been guided by a strategic vision of a resilient, healthy, and prosperous Nation in the face of a changing climate. To achieve this vision, the Task Force identified a set of guiding principles that public and private decision-makers should consider in designing and implementing adaptation strategies.

415

Federal Technical Capability Program  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Technical Capability Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) Home About the FTCP FTCP Topics FTCP Meetings Performance Indicator Reports Guiding Documents Qualifying Official Training Approaches FTCP Plans, Reports & Issue Papers Workforce Analysis & Staffing Site Specific Information Nuclear Executive Leadership Training General Information 2004-1 FTCP Commitments FTCP Correspondence Site Map Contact Us Quick Reference Departmental Representative to the DNFSB Facility Representative Safety System Oversight DOE Integrated Safety Management National Training Center DOE Directives Program DOE Technical Standards Program DOE Phone Book HSS Logo FTCP FTCP Topics DOE Strategic Human Capital Plan (FY 2006 - 2011) New Directions in Learning: Building a DOE University System May 4, 2007, the Deputy Secretary memorandum designating Karen Boardman the FTCP Chairperson.

416

Federal Railroad Administration  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Update Du Update Du Jour Department Of Energy Transportation External Coordination Working Group Meeting Albuquerque, New Mexico April 21-23, 2004 Presented by Kevin R. Blackwell Radioactive Materials Program Manager Federal Railroad Administration Federal Railroad Administration Dedicated Train Study- Report to Congress FRA' s Research & Development Office (as lead on the study) received a draft final report from the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (VNTSC) in late November, 2003. Editorial corrections were made and a final draft dated February, 2004 was provided to FRA. Final Draft Report FRA has been reviewed and been sent to FRA Administrator for clearance and forwarding to DOT OST. FRA has already "Officially Coordinated" and briefed DOT OST and

417

Finding of no significant impact for the joint DOE/EPA program on national industrial competitiveness through energy efficiency and economics (NICE{sup 3})  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared a Programmatic Environmental Assessment (PEA), to assess the environment impacts associated with a joint DOE/EPA cost-sharing grant program named National Industrial Competitiveness through Energy Efficiency, Environment and Economics (NICE{sup 3}). The purpose of the NICE{sup 3} Program is to encourage waste minimization technology in industry by funding projects that develop activities and process improvements to conserve energy and reduce pollution. The proposed action would provide Federal financial assistance in the form of grants to industry in order to promote pollution prevention, energy efficiency, and cost competitiveness. Based on the analysis presented in the PEA, DOE has determined that the proposed action (providing NICE{sup 3} grants for projects which are consistent with the goals of the PPA and EPACT) does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA. Therefore, the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement is not needed and the Department is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact.

NONE

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

418

EA-1628: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

628: Finding of No Significant Impact 628: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1628: Finding of No Significant Impact Construction and Operation of a Proposed Lignocellulosic Biorefinery, POET Project LIBERTY, LLC, Emmetsburg, Iowa The Department of Energy proposes to provide financial assistance (the Proposed Action) to POET Project LIBERTY, LLC (POET) for the construction and operation of the lignocellulosic ethanol production facility (Project LIBERTY) near the City of Emmetsburg, Iowa. Mitigation Action Plan for the Environmental Assessment, Notice of Wetlands Involvement and Finding of No Significant Impact for Construction and Operation of a Proposed Lignocellulosic Biorefinery, Emmetsburg, Iowa, DOE/EA-1628 (September 2008) More Documents & Publications EA-1628: Mitigation Action Plan

419

Significant Accomplishments--Dissemination  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Significant Accomplishments-- Dissemination Four publications coming from the WISELI group accepted of difficulty/resistance FUNDING. We are working hard to find ways to continue WISELI after December 2006. We; and Alison P. Lenton. 2001. "Imagining Stereotypes Away: The Moderation of Implicit Stereotypes Through

Sheridan, Jennifer

420

Finding of No Significant Impact for the Storage of Tritium-Producing Burnable Absorber Rods in K-Area Transfer Bay at the Savannah River Site (DOE/EA-1528) (06/01/05)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

the the Storage of Tritium-Producing Burnable Absorber Rods in K-Area Transfer Bay at the Savannah River Site Agency: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Action: Finding of No Significant Impact Summary: The DOE Savannah River Operations Office (SR) and the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Savannah River Site Office (SRSO) have prepared an environmental assessment (EA), DOE/EA-1528, to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the temporary dry storage of a cask containing Tritium- Producing Burnable Absorber Rods (TPBARs) in the Transfer Bay in K Area at the Savannah River Site (SRS). Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

DOE/EA-1636: Finding of No Significant Impact for the Albany-Burnt Woods and Santiam-Toledo Pole Replacement Project EA (March 2009)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Albany-Burnt Woods and Santiam-Toledo Pole Replacement Project Albany-Burnt Woods and Santiam-Toledo Pole Replacement Project Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) and Floodplain Statement of Findings DOE/EA-1636 Summary The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) announces its environmental findings on the Albany- Burnt Woods and Santiam-Toledo Pole Replacement Project. This project involves replacing wood pole structures on the existing Albany-Burnt Woods single-circuit, 115-kilovolt (kV) transmission line and along a portion of the existing Santiam-Toledo single circuit, 230-kV transmission line. BPA has prepared an environmental assessment (DOE/EA-1636) evaluating the proposed project and its alternative. Based on the analysis in the EA, BPA has determined that the Proposed Action is not a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, within the

422

Federal Energy Management Program: Services  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Services to Services to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Services on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Services on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Services on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Services on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Services on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Services on AddThis.com... Project Assistance Training Outreach Services The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) offers specialized services through: Technical and Project Assistance: Find resources for technical assistance and information about FEMP calls for projects. Training: Look up FEMP-produced live and on-demand courses, workshops, and webinars. Outreach: Get information about awards and campaigns that motivate energy-

423

Federal Technical Capability Program - Quarterly Performance Indicator  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Quarterly Performance Indicator Reports Quarterly Performance Indicator Reports 2013 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability August 16, 2013 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability June 5, 2013 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability February 20, 2013 2012 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability November 20, 2012 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability August 8, 2012 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability May 30, 2012 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability March 6, 2012 2011 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability November 10, 2011 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability August 24, 2011 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability May 18, 2011 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability February 23, 2011

424

Civil Penalty Actions For Certification Violations Resolved | Department of  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Civil Penalty Actions For Certification Violations Resolved Civil Penalty Actions For Certification Violations Resolved Civil Penalty Actions For Certification Violations Resolved May 6, 2010 - 12:39pm Addthis Today, the Department of Energy announced that it had resolved civil penalty actions against four showerhead manufacturers for having violated the Department's water conservation certification regulations. To resolve these actions Zoe Industries, Altmans Products LLC, EZ-FLO International, and Watermark Designs Ltd. have now certified that their showerheads meet federal water conservation standards and collectively will pay civil penalties of $165,104. DOE had initiated cases against the four manufacturers on January 25th, alleging that they had failed to submit required documents to DOE demonstrating compliance with federal

425

Civil Penalty Actions For Certification Violations Resolved | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Civil Penalty Actions For Certification Violations Resolved Civil Penalty Actions For Certification Violations Resolved Civil Penalty Actions For Certification Violations Resolved May 6, 2010 - 12:39pm Addthis Today, the Department of Energy announced that it had resolved civil penalty actions against four showerhead manufacturers for having violated the Department's water conservation certification regulations. To resolve these actions Zoe Industries, Altmans Products LLC, EZ-FLO International, and Watermark Designs Ltd. have now certified that their showerheads meet federal water conservation standards and collectively will pay civil penalties of $165,104. DOE had initiated cases against the four manufacturers on January 25th, alleging that they had failed to submit required documents to DOE demonstrating compliance with federal

426

Federal Spectrum Management at the National Telecommunications...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Spectrum Management at the National Telecommunications and Information Administration Federal Spectrum Management at the National Telecommunications and Information...

427

Sandia National Laboratories: Federal Laboratory Consortium Regional...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

& CapabilitiesCapabilitiesFederal Laboratory Consortium Regional Technology-Transfer Awards Salute Innovation, Commercialization at Sandia Federal Laboratory...

428

Executive Order 13423- Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

423- Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management Executive Order 13423- Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management It...

429

Executive Order 13423: Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Executive Order 13423: Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management Executive Order 13423: Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and...

430

Federal Biomass Activities | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Federal Biomass Activities Federal Biomass Activities Statutory and executive order requirements for Bioproducts and Biofuels federalbiomassactivities.pdf More Documents &...

431

Federal royalty oil eligibility requirements: the plateau legacy  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The courts ruled in the 1979 Plateau decision that the Secretary of the Interior is obligated to allocate federal royalty oil among all refineries not having their own crude oil source of supply, and can not impose Small Business Administration (SBA) eligibility requirements on potential purchasers of federal royalty oil. The effects of this decision was to derail the government's attempt to make royalty oil produced from Outer Continental Shelf leases and onshore sites available to the same refiners. The Minerals Management Service has yet to adopt final regulations harmonizing the court's ruling with applicable statutory requirements, resulting in actions of dubious legality. 75 references.

Zimmerman, J.J.; Bullerdick, K.H.

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

432

Federal Technology Portal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

eere.energy.gov eere.energy.gov BTP and FEMP Technology Portal March 15, 2012 2 eere.energy.gov Background * This presentation was developed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory at the request of the U.S. Department of Defense Tri-Services and the Federal Energy Management Program. * It incorporates initial feedback from representatives of the Interagency Task Force Technology Deployment Working Group. 3 eere.energy.gov Technology Readiness Levels 9. Actual system "flight proven" through successful mission operations 8. Actual system completed and "flight qualified" through test and demonstration 7. System prototype demonstration in a operational environment

433

Federal Technology Portal  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

BTP and FEMP Technology Portal March 15, 2012 2 eere.energy.gov Background * This presentation was developed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory at the request of the U.S. Department of Defense Tri-Services and the Federal Energy Management Program. * It incorporates initial feedback from representatives of the Interagency Task Force Technology Deployment Working Group. 3 eere.energy.gov Technology Readiness Levels 9. Actual system "flight proven" through successful mission operations 8. Actual system completed and "flight qualified" through test and demonstration 7. System prototype demonstration in a operational environment

434

Award Number: Federal Non-Federal Federal Non-Federal Total  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 Previous Edition Usable Total (5) f. Contractual g. Construction Section B - Budget Categories Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number Grant Program Function or Activity Estimated Unobligated Funds e. Supplies i. Total Direct Charges (sum of 6a-6h) Grant Program, Function or Activity Object Class Categories Authorized for Local Reproduction h. Other a. Personnel b. Fringe Benefits c. Travel d. Equipment 6. j. Indirect Charges k. Totals (sum of 6i-6j) Program Income Applicant Name: Budget Information - Non Construction Programs OMB Approval No. 0348-0044 New or Revised Budget Section A - Budget Summary

435

Award Number: Federal Non-Federal Federal Non-Federal Total  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

j. Indirect Charges j. Indirect Charges k. Totals (sum of 6i-6j) Program Income Applicant Name: Budget Information - Non Construction Programs OMB Approval No. 0348-0044 New or Revised Budget Section A - Budget Summary i. Total Direct Charges (sum of 6a-6h) Grant Program, Function or Activity Object Class Categories Authorized for Local Reproduction h. Other a. Personnel b. Fringe Benefits c. Travel d. Equipment 6. Total (5) f. Contractual g. Construction Section B - Budget Categories Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number Grant Program Function or Activity Estimated Unobligated Funds e. Supplies Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 Previous Edition Usable

436

FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROGRAM  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROGRAM C C A A L L E E N N D D A A R R Y Y E E A A R R S S 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 - - 2 2 0 0 1 1 2 2 B B I I E E N N N N I I A A L L R R E E P P O O R R T T UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY November 2013 INTENTIONALLY BLANK FTCP 2011-2012 Biennial Report ~ 2 ~ Table of Contents Section Title Page 1.0 Purpose and Scope .......................................................................................... 3 2.0 2011/2012 Accomplishments.......................................................................... 3

437

Affirmative Action and Higher Education in Brazil  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This article examines the impact of affirmative action in Brazil. Since 2003, some public universities have adopted a quota system for students from public schools, blacks (blacks and mestizos), indigenous people, poor ones, and people with special disability needs. This approach investigates the implementation of a quota system in the Federal University of Bahia. Bahia is the state with the highest percentage of black people in Brazil. The article analyzes the performance of students who were admitted by the quota system during 2 years. It also suggests that affirmative action must be understood in different contexts, principally in relation to other countries such as the United States and India.

J.T. dos Santos; D.M. Queiroz

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

438

National Action Plan on Demand Response  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

David Kathan, Ph.D David Kathan, Ph.D Federal Energy Regulatory Commission U.S. DOE Electricity Advisory Committee October 29, 2010 Demand Response as Power System Resources The author's views do not necessarily represent the views of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 2 Demand Response * FERC (Order 719) defines demand response as: - A reduction in the consumption of electric energy by customers from their expected consumption in response to an increase in the price of electric energy or to in incentive payments designed to induce lower consumption of electric energy. * The National Action Plan on Demand Response released by FERC staff broadens this definition to include - Consumer actions that can change any part of the load profile of a utility or region, not just the period of peak usage

439

Regulatory and Financial Reform of Federal Research Policy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Regulatory and Financial Reform of Federal Research Policy Regulatory and Financial Reform of Federal Research Policy Recommendations to the NRC Committee on Research Universities January 21, 2011 Introduction At the request of the National Research Council (NRC) Committee on Research Universities, the Council on Governmental Relations (COGR), the Association of American Universities (AAU), and the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities (APLU) have assembled a set of ten recommendations for regulatory reform that would improve research universities' ability to carry out their missions without requiring a significant financial investment by the Federal government. We firmly believe that compliance and regulatory oversight are essential to the conduct of federally-supported research. Rationalizing the Federal regulatory infrastructure is essential to

440

Regulatory and Financial Reform of Federal Research Policy: Recommendations  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

and Financial Reform of Federal Research Policy: and Financial Reform of Federal Research Policy: Recommendations to the NRC Committee on Research Universities Regulatory and Financial Reform of Federal Research Policy: Recommendations to the NRC Committee on Research Universities At the request of the National Research Council (NRC) Committee on Research Universities, the Council on Governmental Relations (COGR), the Association of American Universities (AAU), and the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities (APLU) have assembled a set of ten recommendations for regulatory reform that would improve research universities' ability to carry out their missions without requiring a significant financial investment by the Federal government. Regulatory and Financial Reform of Federal Research Policy: Recommendations

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Technology Deployment Working  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Technology Deployment Working Group Technology Deployment Working Group Energy Department Announces Interagency Committee to Increase Use of Clean Energy Technologies in Federal Facilities The Senior Executive Committee for Technology Deployment, a subcommittee of the Interagency Technology Deployment Working Group, brings together leaders of technology deployment programs from across the federal government to implement the Obama Administration's comprehensive strategy to reduce energy costs in agency facilities, while boosting American competitiveness in the global clean energy race. Learn more. Technology Briefs Boiler Combustion Control and Monitoring System Doing Time under the Sun Wireless Sensor Networks for Data Centers The Federal Technology Deployment Working Group helps Federal agencies evaluate and deploy new and underutilized technologies.

442

Finding of No Significant Impact for Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Central Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps (01/01)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

01 01 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 14 / Monday, January 22, 2001 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Finding of No Significant Impact Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for Energy Conservation Standard for Residential Central Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps. SUMMARY: The Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended by the National Energy Conservation Policy Act and the National Appliance Energy Conservation Act, and the National Appliance Energy Conservation Amendments, prescribes energy conservation standards for certain major household appliances, and requires the Department of Energy (DOE) to administer an energy conservation program for these products. Based on an

443

Develop an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

After establishing a goal and assessing the rules, roles, and tools, Federal agencies can develop an action plan (select the strategies that will be implemented over time to achieve and maintain energy and sustainability goals). This action plan should target specific audiences with tailored strategies and take into account the need to review and revise strategies in the long-term. The action plan must include appropriate metrics and regular measurement. Remember that planning useful efficiency and sustainability evaluation is necessary before an organization begins to implement an action plan.

444

NNSA PERSONNEL SECURITY CLEARANCE ACTION REQUEST Required: SUBJECT INFORMATION  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

PERSONNEL SECURITY PERSONNEL SECURITY CLEARANCE ACTION REQUEST Required: SUBJECT INFORMATION Contractor Federal Name (Last, First, Middle): Suffix: Date of Birth: Social Security Number: Place of Birth (city and state/country): Citizenship(s): Email Address: Employer (legal name): Job Title: Required: LOCATION/BILLING Work Location: Contracting Office Location/SON: Prime Contract Number: Sub-contract Number: Facility Code: Employer Code: Required: CLEARANCE ACTION Requested Action(s): Clearance Level: (for employer/contract above) Clearance History Never held a clearance Previously held Currently holds Key Management Personnel (KMP)? Human Reliability Program (HRP)? PERSONNEL SECURITY USE ONLY: DOE Clearance: Special Access Program (SAP)? Yes No CLEARANCE JUSTIFICATION NARRATIVE

445

Federal Regulations | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Regulations Federal Regulations Federal Regulations NOTE: Adobe Acrobat Reader may be necessary to view PDF documents listed below. Accessibility Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act - Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility Standards Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act - Nondiscrimination Under Federal Grants and Programs Federal Records Act Freedom of Information Act (as amended) Freedom of Information Act Updates Privacy Act of 1974 (as amended) Privacy Act Overview Cyber Security Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (PDF) Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986 (PDF) Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 Federal Information Security Management of 2002 ( Title III of E-Gov) Homeland Security Act of 2002 ( includes Cyber Security Act of 2002 and Critical Infrastructure Act of 2002)

446

North Slope (Wahluke Slope) expedited response action cleanup plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this action is to mitigate any threat to public health and the environment from hazards on the North Slope and meet the expedited response action (ERA) objective of cleanup to a degree requiring no further action. The ERA may be the final remediation of the 100-I-3 Operable Unit. A No Action record of decision (ROD) may be issued after remediation completion. The US Department of Energy (DOE) currently owns or administers approximately 140 mi{sup 2} (about 90,000 acres) of land north and east of the Columbia River (referred to as the North Slope) that is part of the Hanford Site. The North Slope, also commonly known as the Wahluke Slope, was not used for plutonium production or support facilities; it was used for military air defense of the Hanford Site and vicinity. The North Slope contained seven antiaircraft gun emplacements and three Nike-Ajax missile positions. These military positions were vacated in 1960--1961 as the defense requirements at Hanford changed. They were demolished in 1974. Prior to government control in 1943, the North Slope was homesteaded. Since the initiation of this ERA in the summer of 1992, DOE signed the modified Hanford Federal Agreement and Consent Order (Tri-Party Agreement) with the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in which a milestone was set to complete remediation activities and a draft closeout report by October 1994. Remediation activities will make the North Slope area available for future non-DOE uses. Thirty-nine sites have undergone limited characterization to determine if significant environmental hazards exist. This plan documents the results of that characterization and evaluates the potential remediation alternatives.

Not Available

1994-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

447

Develop an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Develop an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability Develop an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability Develop an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability October 8, 2013 - 11:50am Addthis Graphic showing 5 gears. They progress from Determine Goal to Identify Context-Rules, Roles and Tools to Develop Action Plan to Implement Plan to Measure and Evaluate. Institutional Change Continuous Improvement Cycle After establishing a goal and assessing the rules, roles, and tools, Federal agencies can develop an action plan (select the strategies that will be implemented over time to achieve and maintain energy and sustainability goals). This action plan should target specific audiences with tailored strategies and take into account the need to review and revise strategies in the long-term. The action plan must include appropriate metrics and regular

448

Implement an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Implement an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability Implement an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability Implement an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability October 8, 2013 - 11:54am Addthis Graphic showing 5 gears. They progress from Determine Goal to Identify Context-Rules, Roles and Tools to Develop Action Plan to Implement Plan to Measure and Evaluate. Institutional Change Continuous Improvement Cycle Writing a good action plan is one thing; implementing it is another. Institutional change principles and methods can be incorporated into action plans (program design), but on-the-ground implementation activities must also be conducted in a manner that is suitable to the organizational context and the people in the roles being targeted. Action plans lay out the set of strategies a Federal agency will roll out

449

2010 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey Page 1 of 20 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Department of Energy 2010 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey: Trend Report (2006 and 2008 results have been recalculated to exclude Do Not Know/No Basis to Judge responses) Response Summary Surveys Completed 2010 Governmentwide 263,475 2010 Department of Energy 6,648 2008 Department of Energy 6,093 2006 Department of Energy 7,742 This 2010 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey Report provides summary results for your department or agency. The results include Positive, Neutral, and Negative response percentages for each survey item. For each of the

450

Federal Buildings Supplemental Survey 1993  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Energy Information Administration (EIA) of the US Department of Energy (DOE) is mandated by Congress to be the agency that collects, analyzes, and disseminates impartial, comprehensive data about energy including the volume consumed, its customers, and the purposes for which it is used. The Federal Buildings Supplemental Survey (FBSS) was conducted by EIA in conjunction with DOE`s Office of Federal Energy Management Programs (OFEMP) to gain a better understanding of how Federal buildings use energy. This report presents the data from 881 completed telephone interviews with Federal buildings in three Federal regions. These buildings were systematically selected using OFEMP`s specifications; therefore, these data do not statistically represent all Federal buildings in the country. The purpose of the FBSS was threefold: (1) to understand the characteristics of Federal buildings and their energy use; (2) to provide a baseline in these three Federal regions to measure future energy use in Federal buildings as required in EPACT; and (3) to compare building characteristics and energy use with the data collected in the CBECS.

NONE

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

451

EA-1463: 10 CFR 433: Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Commercial and High-Rise Multi-Family Residential Buildings and 10 CFR 435: Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal Residential Low-Rise Residential Buildings  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The EA examines the potential environmental impacts of the Final Rule on building habitability and the outdoor environment. To identify the potential environmental impacts that may result from implementing the Final Rule for new Federal commercial and residential buildings, DOE compared the Final Rule with the “no-action alternative” of using the current Federal standards – 10 CFR Part 434 and 10 CFR Part 435 Subpart C (referred to as the “no-action alternative”).

452

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 370: T-4 Atmospheric Test Site, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 370, T-4 Atmospheric Test Site, located in Area 4 at the Nevada Test Site, Nevada, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO). Corrective Action Unit 370 is comprised of Corrective Action Site (CAS) 04-23-01, Atmospheric Test Site T-4. The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 370 due to the implementation of the corrective action of closure in place with administrative controls. To achieve this, corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from June 25, 2008, through April 2, 2009, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 370: T-4 Atmospheric Test Site and Record of Technical Change No. 1.

Patrick Matthews

2009-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

453

Federal Project Directors in  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

appropriate front-end plan- appropriate front-end plan- ning process would help DOE to identify the mission need for the project and aid in iden- tification and evaluation of alternative approaches and assessment of the cost and risks of each. This should lead to a well-defined set of re- quirements and scope of work that form the basis for effec- tive design. Front-end plan- ning in the DOE project man- agement system includes plan- ning procedures from project conception through approval of the performance baseline (CD-2). The Office of Engineering and Construction Management has developed two guides to assist Federal Project Directors in measuring progress toward achieving technology and pro- ject definition maturity during front-end planning prior to CD -2. DOE G 413.3-4, Technol-

454

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Annual Energy Reports and Performance Annual Energy Reports and Performance Published Annual Reports Visit the FEMP Library to search for read FEMP Annual Reports to Congress on Federal Government Energy Management. For more information, contact Chris Tremper. The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) offers information and data sets illustrating Federal agencies' annual progress in meeting facility energy goals. Additional detail about each agency's performance can be found in their Strategic Sustainability Performance Plans on the Performance.Gov website. Federal Facility Efficiency Investment and Progress toward Sustainability Goals: Get an overview of Federal progress made in facility energy management and sustainability based on preliminary fiscal year (FY) 2012 reported findings. (For facility-level data reported under Section 432 of EISA, see EISA CTS Reports and Data.)

455

Federal and Non-federal Funding Sources | BNL Technology Commercialization  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Sponsored Research Sponsored Research Federal Resources Non-federal Resources Federal Agencies and Resources Below are links to a range of federal agencies and resources, including direct links to specific information for seeking research grant support. Please note that the inclusion of a particular agency or program office does not mean that national laboratories are in all cases eligible to receive funding from that entity. If you have questions regarding BNL's eligibility for a particular program, please contact Alison Schwartz, (631) 344-3428. Federal Agencies Department of Agriculture (USDA) Department of Commerce (DOC) National Institute of Standards and Technology National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Department of Defense (DOD) Department of Education (ED) Department of Energy (DOE)

456

Federal Register Volume 75 Number 240; Wednesday, December 15, 2010  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0 Dec 14, 2010 0 Dec 14, 2010 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM 15DEN1 hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 15, 2010 / Notices 78231 Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877- 8339. [FR Doc. 2010-31503 Filed 12-14-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000-01-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Management of Energy and Water Efficiency in Federal Buildings: Availability of Guidance AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of availability. SUMMARY: This notice of availability announces that the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Federal Energy Management

457

Federal Register Volume 72 Number 117; Tuesday, June 19, 2007  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5:19 Jun 18, 2007 5:19 Jun 18, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19JNP1.SGM 19JNP1 ebenthall on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS 33696 Federal Register Proposed Rules Vol. 72, No. 117 Tuesday, June 19, 2007 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 10 CFR Part 436 RIN 1904-AB68 Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy (DOE). ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy

458

ASSESSMENT OF TECHNICAL QUALIFICATION AND FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROGRAMS  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

And TQP Assessment Crads 11 2012 Smooth (2) 1 11/29/12 And TQP Assessment Crads 11 2012 Smooth (2) 1 11/29/12 ASSESSMENT OF TECHNICAL QUALIFICATION AND FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROGRAMS This document provides guidance and objectives and criteria to support assessments required by DOE O 426.1 Federal Technical Capability (FTC), Section 4. REQUIREMENTS, paragraph b. FTC Program Implementation, subparagraph (7) Self- Assessment. This FTC Order paragraph requires self-assessment of TQP and FTC Program implementation within one's organization. To ensure effective implementation of the Technical Qualification Programs (TQP), Headquarters and field elements conduct self-assessments of these programs. The Federal Technical Capability Panel (FTCP) also reviews the results of the TQP self-assessments and determines if further action is

459

Federal Register Volume 72 Number 245; Friday, December 21, 2007  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

20 Dec 20, 2007 20 Dec 20, 2007 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\21DER1.SGM 21DER1 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 245 / Friday, December 21, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 72565 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 10 CFR Parts 433, 434, and 435 [Docket No. EE-RM/STD-02-112] RIN 1904-AB13 Energy Conservation Standards for New Federal Commercial and Multi- Family High-Rise Residential Buildings and New Federal Low-Rise Residential Buildings AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is adopting with changes the interim final rule published on December 4, 2006 (71 FR 70275) that implemented provisions in the Energy

460

Federal Energy Efficiency Acquisition Guidance and Requirements for  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Heat Pump Water Heaters Heat Pump Water Heaters Federal Energy Efficiency Acquisition Guidance and Requirements for Residential Heat Pump Water Heaters October 30, 2013 - 9:50am Addthis Did You Know? Heat pump water heaters are the most efficient electric water heaters available, saving 50% to 60% over standard products. FEMP provides acquisition guidance and Federal efficiency requirements across a variety of product categories, including residential heat pump water heaters, which are an ENERGY STAR®-qualified product category. Federal laws and executive orders mandate that agencies meet these efficiency requirements in all procurement and acquisition actions that are not specifically exempted by law. The following guidance and requirements apply to residential heat pump water heaters that operate on 250 volts or less, have a current rating of

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Federal Register Volume 66 Number 250; Monday, December 31, 2001  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

20:14 Dec 28, 2001 20:14 Dec 28, 2001 Jkt 197001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM pfrm07 PsN: 31DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 250 / Monday, December 31, 2001 / Notices 67517 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Federal Energy Management Program; Federal Purchasing of Energy-Efficient Standby Power Devices AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of availability of a preliminary list of standby power products and testing guidelines. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE or Department) is publishing a preliminary standby product list and testing guidelines on its website as part of the implementation of Executive Order 13221, which directs government agencies to purchase devices with

462

Federal Register Volume 66 Number 250; Monday, December 31, 2001  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

20:14 Dec 28, 2001 20:14 Dec 28, 2001 Jkt 197001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM pfrm07 PsN: 31DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 250 / Monday, December 31, 2001 / Notices 67517 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Federal Energy Management Program; Federal Purchasing of Energy-Efficient Standby Power Devices AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of availability of a preliminary list of standby power products and testing guidelines. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE or Department) is publishing a preliminary standby product list and testing guidelines on its website as part of the implementation of Executive Order 13221, which directs government agencies to purchase devices with

463

Federal Energy Efficiency Acquisition Guidance and Requirements for  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Electric Resistance Water Heaters Electric Resistance Water Heaters Federal Energy Efficiency Acquisition Guidance and Requirements for Residential Electric Resistance Water Heaters October 7, 2013 - 10:41am Addthis Did you know? Heat pump water heaters are more efficient than standard electric resistance type products. Using the same plumbing and electrical connections, they serve as a drop-in replacement for electric resistance, storage-type water heaters. FEMP sets Federal efficiency requirements and provides acquisition guidance across a variety of product categories, including residential electric resistance water heaters. Federal laws and executive orders mandate that agencies meet these efficiency requirements in all procurement and acquisition actions that are not specifically exempted by law.

464

Savannah River Site Federal Facility Agreement, January 15, 1993 Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Site Site Agreement Name Savannah River Site Federal Facility Agreement Under Section 120 of CERCLA, January 15, 1993 State South Carolina Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary Ensure that the environmental impacts associated with past and present activities at the Savannah River Site are thoroughly investigated and that appropriate response actions are taken to protect the public health, welfare, and the environment. Parties DOE; US EPA; South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) Date 1/15/1993 SCOPE * Ensure that the environmental impacts associated with past and present activities at the Savannah River Site are thoroughly investigated and that appropriate response actions are taken to protect the public health, welfare, and the environment.

465

A New Framework for Adaptive Sampling and Analysis During Long-Term Monitoring and Remedial Action Management  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

DOE and other Federal agencies are making a significant investment in the development of field analytical techniques, nonintrusive technologies, and sensor technologies that will have a profound impact on the way environmental monitoring is conducted. Monitoring and performance evaluation networks will likely be base on suites of in situ sensors, with physical sampling playing a much more limited role. Designing and using these types of networks effectively will require development of a new paradigm for sampling and analysis of remedial actions, which is the overall goal of this project.

Minsker, Barbara; Albert Valocchi; Barbara Bailey

2008-01-27T23:59:59.000Z

466

Affirmative Action in Higher Education and Afro-Descendant Women in Bahia, Brazil  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Affirmative Action in Higher Education and Afro-Descendant Women in Bahia, Brazil In 2001, the federal government of Brazil under President Fernando Henrique Cardoso (1995 - 2003) passed laws to remedy racial and socioeconomic inequality. Responding...

Aubel, Maraci G.

2011-05-31T23:59:59.000Z

467

Climate change action plan  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Delivery Climate change action plan 2009-2011 #12;2 | Climate change action plan ©istockphoto.com #12;Climate Change Action Plan Climate change action plan | 3 Contents Overview 4 Preface and Introduction 5 Climate change predictions for Scotland 6 The role of forestry 7 Protecting and managing

468

Executive Order 13212 - Actions To Expedite Energy-Related Projects:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Executive Order 13212 - Actions To Expedite Energy-Related Executive Order 13212 - Actions To Expedite Energy-Related Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 66, No. 99 - May 18, 2001 Executive Order 13212 - Actions To Expedite Energy-Related Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 66, No. 99 - May 18, 2001 The increased production and transmission of energy in a safe and environmentally sound manner is essential to the well-being of the American people. In general, it is the policy of this Administration that executive departments and agencies (agencies) shall take appropriate actions, to the extent consistent with applicable law, to expedite projects that will increase the production, transmission, or conservation of energy. Executive Order 13212: 66 FR 28357 (22 May 2001) More Documents & Publications

469

Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 204: Storage Bunkers, Nevada Test Site, Nevada: Revision 0, Including Errata Sheet  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document identifies the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office's corrective action alternative recommendation for each of the corrective action sites (CASs) within Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 204: Storage Bunkers, Nevada Test Site (NTS), Nevada, under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. An evaluation of analytical data from the corrective action investigation, review of current and future operations at each CAS, and a detailed comparative analysis of potential corrective action alternatives were used to determine the appropriate corrective action for each CAS. There are six CASs in CAU 204, which are all located between Areas 1, 2, 3, and 5 on the NTS. The No Further Action alternative was recommended for CASs 01-34-01, 02-34-01, 03-34-01, and 05-99-02; and a Closure in Place with Administrative Controls recommendation was the preferred corrective action for CASs 05-18-02 and 05-33-01. These alternatives were judged to meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated as well as applicable state and federal regulations for closure of the sites and will eliminate potential future exposure pathways to the contaminated media at CAU 204.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office

2004-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

470

History of federal transportation policy  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

History of federal transportation policy TTP 220 S. Handy 4/7/14 #12;Federal Transportation Policy · Rise of road building (1910s +) · Rise of mandated planning (1960s +) · Rise of transit funding (1960s for road building support from the start! · Cars seen as way to decentralize, to get people away from ills

Handy, Susan L.

471

FIPS PUB 188 Federal Information  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FIPS PUB 188 Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 1994 September 6 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE / National Institute of Standards and Technology Standard Security Label for Information Transfer Foreword The Federal Information Processing Standards Publication Series of the National Institute

472

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Related Federal Programs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

About About Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Related Federal Programs to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Related Federal Programs on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Related Federal Programs on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Related Federal Programs on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Related Federal Programs on Delicious Rank Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Related Federal Programs on Digg Find More places to share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Related Federal Programs on AddThis.com... Our History Related Federal Programs Why Energy Efficiency Upgrades Contacts Related Federal Programs Related Links

473

EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Federal Statutes  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Key Key Federal Statutes to someone by E-mail Share EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Federal Statutes on Facebook Tweet about EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Federal Statutes on Twitter Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Federal Statutes on Google Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Federal Statutes on Delicious Rank EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Federal Statutes on Digg Find More places to share EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Federal Statutes on AddThis.com... Home About Contacts Covered Fleets Compliance Methods Alternative Fuel Petitions Resources Key Federal Statutes These are excerpts from federal statutes that established key Energy Policy Act (EPAct) transportation regulatory activities.

474

Federal Participation in LEED Christopher Payne1  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Federal Participation in LEED Christopher Payne1 Beverly Dyer2 1 Environmental Energy-mail: CTPayne@lbl.gov 2 Federal Energy Management Program, U. S. Department of Energy. Phone: +1 202 586 expectations for ongoing partnership. CERTIFIED FEDERAL BUILDINGS US federal agencies have certified 16 federal

475

Federal Energy Management Program: Metering  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Metering Metering Historically, the Federal sector has lagged in metering applications. It is not uncommon to find one meter serving hundreds of Federal facilities. These master meters make it very difficult to manage energy use and are a primary driver for Federal metering requirements. To help Federal agencies meet these requirements, this section outlines strategies and resources surrounding metering best practices, including: Metering Systems: Overview of metering system capabilities and functionality as well as common components across various metering systems. Metering Approaches: Description of the four primary approaches to metering, including required equipment common for each approach. Metering Process: Outline of the five step process typically used to evaluate, design, install, and implement Federal metering programs.

476

Reducing the Federal Energy Bill  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 1 Reducing the Federal Energy Bill Berkeley Lab's Work with the Federal Energy Management Program It costs billions of dollars and uses more energy than any other entity in the United States. What is it? Answer: the Federal government. In fiscal year 1995, the Federal government spent $8 billion on a net energy consumption of 1.15 quadrillion BTUs. While that may be a lot of energy in absolute terms, the numbers have been improving for years. Compared with fiscal year 1985, the 1995 energy-use figure is down by 22.5%, and the costs are down $2.5 billion. The decline is explained in part by the activities of FEMP (the Federal Energy Management Program) and the efforts of energy-efficiency experts at national laboratories, such as those at Berkeley Lab's Environmental Energy

477

Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 March 2002 FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT TRANSURANIC WASTE RETRIEVAL FROM THE 218-W-4B AND 218-W-4C LOW-LEVEL BURIAL GROUNDS HANFORD SITE, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY March 2002 U.S. Department of Energy Finding of No Significant Impact 2 March 2002 This page intentionally left blank. U.S. Department of Energy Finding of No Significant Impact 3 March 2002 AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA), DOE/EA-1405, for retrieval of transuranic waste from the 218-W-4B and 218-W-4C low-level burial grounds located in the 200 West Area of the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington. Based on the

478

Memorandum: Emergency Actions and NEPA  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8, 2005 8, 2005 MEMORANDUM FOR FEDERAL NEPA CONTACTS FROM: HORST G. GRECZMIEL Associate Director for NEPA Oversight SUBJECT: Emergency Actions and NEPA This memorandum provides: * General information on the response to Katrina * Reporting oil and chemical spills * Projected long term recovery efforts * How agencies can respond to emergencies and comply with NEPA. Please distribute this memorandum to your agency planning and environmental personnel. General information on the response to Katrina: Information is available on the FEMA website at http://www.fema.gov and specifics on the government's response are provided at the "What Government is Doing" link which can be directly accessed at http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/interapp/editorial/editorial_0712.xml

479

30-Day Federal Register Notice - Extension  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

30-Day Federal Register Notice - Extension [6450-01-P] DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Agency Information Collection Extension AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy. ACTION: Submission for Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review; comment request SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) has submitted an information collection request to the OMB for extension under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The information collection requests a three-year extension of its {enter the Title of the collection from question number 7 on OMB Form 83-I}}, OMB Control Number 1910-{enter 4-digit control number}. The proposed collection will {enter a brief description of the collection that highlights the major questions being asked; suggested length is 2 to 5 sentences}..

480

30-Day Federal Register Notice - Extension  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

30-Day Federal Register Notice - Extension [6450-01-P] DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Agency Information Collection Extension AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy. ACTION: Submission for Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review; comment request SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) has submitted an information collection request to the OMB for extension under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The information collection requests a three-year extension of its {enter the Title of the collection from question number 7 on OMB Form 83-I}}, OMB Control Number 1910-{enter 4-digit control number}. The proposed collection will {enter a brief description of the collection that highlights the major questions being asked; suggested length is 2 to 5 sentences}..

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Corrective Action Plan for Corrective Action Unit 490: Station 44 Burn Area, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 490, Station 44 Burn Area is located on the Tonopah Test Range (TTR). CAU 490 is listed in the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO, 1996) and includes for Corrective Action Sites (CASs): (1) Fire Training Area (CAS 03-56-001-03BA); (2) Station 44 Burn Area (CAS RG-56-001-RGBA); (3) Sandia Service Yard (CAS 03-58-001-03FN); and (4) Gun Propellant Burn Area (CAS 09-54-001-09L2).

K. B. Campbell

2002-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

482

1998 federal energy and water management award winners  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Energy is a luxury that no one can afford to waste, and many Federal Government agencies are becoming increasingly aware of the importance of using energy wisely. Thoughtful use of energy resources is important, not only to meet agency goals, but because energy efficiency helps improve air quality. Sound facility management offers huge savings that affect the agency`s bottom line, the environment, and workplace quality. In these fiscally-modest times, pursuing sound energy management programs can present additional challenges for energy and facility managers. The correct path to take is not always the easiest. Hard work, innovation, and vision are characteristic of those who pursue energy efficiency. That is why the Department of energy, Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) is proud to salute the winners of the 1998 Federal Energy and Water Management Award. The 1998 winners represent the kind of 21st century thinking that will help achieve widespread Federal energy efficiency. In one year, the winners, through a combination of public and private partnerships, saved more than $222 million and 10.5 trillion Btu by actively identifying and implementing energy efficiency, water conservation, and renewable energy projects. Through their dedication, hard work, ingenuity, and success, the award winners have also inspired others to increase their own efforts to save energy and water and to more aggressively pursue the use of renewable energy sources. The Federal Energy and Water Management Awards recognize the winners` contributions and ability to inspire others to take action.

NONE

1998-10-28T23:59:59.000Z

483

Federal Utility Program Overview (Fact Sheet)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Fact sheet overview of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Federal Energy Management Program's (FEMP) Federal Utility Program, including common contracts and services available to Federal agencies through local serving utilities.

Not Available

2009-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

484

Reliability and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation—given at the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) Fall 2008 meeting—covers the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) strategic plan, the Federal Power Act (FPA), current energy security posture, and more.

485

2013 Federal Energy and Water Management Award Winners | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

3 Federal Energy and Water Management Award Winners 2013 Federal Energy and Water Management Award Winners 2013 Federal Energy and Water Management Award Winners The Federal Energy...

486

Proposed Rules Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

21813 21813 Vol. 76, No. 75 Tuesday, April 19, 2011 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Part 429 [Docket Number: EERE-2010-BT-CE-0014] RIN 1904-AC23 Energy Conservation Program: Certification, Compliance, and Enforcement for Consumer Products and Commercial and Industrial Equipment AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy. ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or the ''Department'') proposes to amend the compliance dates for revisions to its certification, compliance, and enforcement regulations for certain commercial and industrial equipment covered under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, as amended (EPCA or the ''Act''). Specifically, DOE is tentatively proposing an 18-month extension to the

487

Proposed Rules Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

75798 75798 Vol. 76, No. 233 Monday, December 5, 2011 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 5 CFR Chapter XXIII 10 CFR Chapters II, III, X Reducing Regulatory Burden AGENCY: Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy. ACTION: Request for information. SUMMARY: As part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ''Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' issued by the President on January 18, 2011, the Department of Energy (Department or DOE) is seeking comments and information from interested parties to assist DOE in reviewing its existing regulations to determine whether any such regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. The purpose of DOE's review is to make the agency's regulatory program more effective and less burdensome in achieving its

488

Proposed Rules Federal Register  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

31548 31548 Vol. 77, No. 103 Tuesday, May 29, 2012 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 5 CFR Chapter XXII 10 CFR Chapters II, III, X Reducing Regulatory Burden AGENCY: Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of extension of public comment period. SUMMARY: This notice announces that the period for submitting comments on the Department of Energy's (DOE) request for information (RFI) issued as part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ''Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' is extended to June 19, 2012. DATES: DOE will accept comments, data, and information regarding the RFI received no later than June 19, 2012. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are encouraged to submit comments, identified by ''Regulatory Burden RFI,'' by any of the following methods:

489

Proposed Rules Federal Register  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

43015 43015 Vol. 77, No. 141 Monday, July 23, 2012 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Part 431 [Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-STD-0027] RIN 1904-AC28 Energy Conservation Standards for Commercial and Industrial Electric Motors: Public Meeting and Availability of the Preliminary Technical Support Document AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of public meeting and availability of preliminary technical support document. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or Department) will hold a public meeting to discuss and receive comments on the following: the equipment classes DOE plans to analyze for the purpose of amending energy conservation standards for certain commercial and industrial electric motors under section 342(b) of the

490

Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, December 9, 1991 Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order State Idaho Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary Ensure that the environmental impacts asso