Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Action Month  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Energy Action Month to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Action Month on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Action Month...

2

Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Action Month  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Template Customizable Poster Template 8 12" x 11" 16" x 20" The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) supports Energy Action Month by offering materials that promote...

3

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment This manual...

4

Federal-Tribal Partnership on Climate Change Action Rounds Corner...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal-Tribal Partnership on Climate Change Action Rounds Corner, Shifts Into High Gear at 2013 Tribal Nations Conference Federal-Tribal Partnership on Climate Change Action...

5

Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

44-NO. 62 44-NO. 62 3-29-79 PAGES 18633-18921 E THURSDAY, MARCH 29, 1979 € 18722 NOTICES [ 31 25-01-MI COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 'ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ABROAD OF MAJOR FEDERAL ACTIONS Executive Order 12144; Implementing and Explanotory Documents MARCH 21, 1979. AGENCY: Council on Environmental Quality, Executive Office of t h e F'resi- dent. ACTION: Information Only: Publica- tion of Implementing Documents Con- cerning Executive Order 12114. SUMMARY: O n January 4, 1979, t h e President signed Executive Order 12114, Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions (44 FR 1957 (Jan. 9, 1979)). The Council has re- ceived numerous requests for t h e im- plementing and explanatory docu- ments. I n order efficiently to respond to such public requests. t

6

Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions On January 4, 1979, President Carter signed Executive Order 12114, entitled Environmental Effects of Major Federal Actions. The purpose of this Council on Environmental Quality memorandum is to initiate the consultation process required by this Executive Order. 44 Fed Reg 18633: Council on Environmental Quality: Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions More Documents & Publications Implementation of Executive Order 12114 Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions: Final Guideline EO 12114: Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions Unified Procedures Applicable to Major Federal Actions Relating to Nuclear Activities Subject to Executive Order 12114 (State Department, 44 Fed Reg

7

Federal Energy Management Program: Create Your Own Energy Action...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Create Your Own Energy Action Campaign to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Create Your Own Energy Action Campaign on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy...

8

Federal Energy Management Program: Develop an Institutional Change Action  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Develop an Develop an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Develop an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Develop an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Develop an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Develop an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Develop an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Develop an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability on AddThis.com...

9

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment October 3, 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 - PURPOSE, POLICY, AND MANDATES 1. Purpose 2. Statutory...

10

Unified Procedures Applicable to Major Federal Actions Relating to Nuclear  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Unified Procedures Applicable to Major Federal Actions Relating to Unified Procedures Applicable to Major Federal Actions Relating to Nuclear Activities Subject to Executive Order 12114 (State Department, 44 Fed Reg 65560) Unified Procedures Applicable to Major Federal Actions Relating to Nuclear Activities Subject to Executive Order 12114 (State Department, 44 Fed Reg 65560) The following unified procedures issued by the State Department are established to satisfy the requirement of the Executive Order for implementing procedures concerning nuclear export activities of Federal agencies. 44 Fed Reg 65560: Department of State: Unified Procedures Applicable to Major Federal Actions Relating to Nuclear Activities Subject to Executive Order 12114 More Documents & Publications Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions

11

EO 12114: Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EO 12114: Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions EO 12114: Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions EO 12114: Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions The purpose of this Executive Order is to enable responsible officials of Federal Agencies having ultimate responsibility for authorizing and approving actions encompassed by this Order to be informed of pertinent environmental considerations and to take such considerations into account, with other pertinent considerations of national policy, in making decisions regarding such actions EO 12114: Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions More Documents & Publications EIS-0386: Notice of Intent to Prepare a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, Amend Relevant Agency Land Use Plans, and Conduct Public Scoping

12

Chronological History of Federal Fleet Actions and Mandates (Brochure)  

SciTech Connect

This chronological history of Federal fleet actions and mandates provides a year-by-year timeline of the acts, amendments, executive orders, and other regulations that affect Federal fleets. The fleet actions and mandates included in the timeline span from 1988 to 2009.

Not Available

2011-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

13

Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2898: Federal Actions to Address Environmental 2898: Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (1994) Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (1994) Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (1994). Directs each federal agency to make environmental justice part of its mission, and sets responsibilities for agencies including developing a strategy to identify and address "disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of its programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income populations." This applies equally to Native American programs. This EO also directs "after consultation with tribal

14

Procedures Applicable to Major Federal Actions ... Subject to EO 12114  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 13, 1979 Part 111 Department of State - Office of the Secretary ~ Unified Procedures Applicable to Major Federal Actions Relating to Nuclear Activities Subject to Executive Order 121 14 65560 Federal Register I Vol. 44, No, 220 / T u e s d a y , N o v e m b e r 13, 1979 / Notices DEPARTMENTOFSTATE [Public Notice 6901 Unified Procedures Applicable to Major Federal Actions Relating to Nuclear Activities Subject to Executive Order 12114 . Executive Order 12114. "En\ ironmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions." was signed by the President on Jan-ary 4, 19i9. The Order represents the excl;sive and complete determination by the L'nited States Governmen! of the procedural and other actions to be taken by Federal agencies to further the purposes of the National

15

Enforcement actions: Significant actions resolved individual actions. Semiannual progress report, January 1997--June 1997  

SciTech Connect

This compilation summarizes significant enforcement actions that have been resolved during the period (January - June 1997) and includes copies of Orders and Notices of Violation sent by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to individuals with respect to these enforcement actions. It is anticipated that the information in this publication will be widely disseminated to managers and employees engaged in activities licensed by the NRC. The Commission believes this information may be useful to licensees in making employment decisions.

NONE

1997-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

16

EO 12114: Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

114-Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions 114-Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions SOURCE: The provisions of Executive Order 12114 of January 4, 1979, appear at 44 FR 1957, 3 CFR, 1979, Comp., p. 356, unless otherwise noted. By virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, and as President of the United States, in order to further environmental objectives consistent with the foreign policy and national security policy of the United States, it is ordered as follows: Section 1. 1-1. Purpose and Scope. The purpose of this Executive Order is to enable responsible officials of Federal Agencies having ultimate responsibility for authorizing and approving actions encompassed by this Order to be informed of pertinent environmental considerations and to take

17

Federal Energy Management Program: Develop an Institutional Change Action  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Develop an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability Develop an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability Graphic showing 5 gears. They progress from Determine Goal to Identify Context-Rules, Roles and Tools to Develop Action Plan to Implement Plan to Measure and Evaluate. Institutional Change Continuous Improvement Cycle After establishing a goal and assessing the rules, roles, and tools, Federal agencies can develop an action plan (select the strategies that will be implemented over time to achieve and maintain energy and sustainability goals). This action plan should target specific audiences with tailored strategies and take into account the need to review and revise strategies in the long-term. The action plan must include appropriate metrics and regular measurement. Remember that planning useful efficiency and sustainability evaluation is necessary before an organization begins to implement an action plan.

18

2009 Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) Corrective Action Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

O. Box 5400 O. Box 5400 Albuquerque, NM 87185 The Honorable A.I. Eggenberger Chairman, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 625 Indiana Avenue NW, Suite 700 Washington D.C. 20004-2901 Dear Mr. Chairman: MAR 1 9 2009 Enclosed is the Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) Corrective Action Plan, Revision 2, which is Deliverable B for Commitment 13 in the Department of Energy (DOE) Implementation Plan to Improve Oversight of Nuclear Operations, issued in response to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004-1. This plan has been updated to identify that all Department corrective actions to improve recruiting, developing, training, qualifying, maintaining proficiency of, and retaining technical personnel to safely accomplish DOE's mission have been completed. This revised

19

2007 Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) Corrective Action Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7,2007 7,2007 The Honorable A. J. Eggenberger Chairman, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 625 Indiana Avenue NW, Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20004-290 1 Dear Mr. Chairman: Enclosed is Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) Corrective Action Plan, Revision 1, which is Deliverable B for Commitment 13 in the Department of Energy (DOE) Implementation Plan to Improve Oversight of Nuclear Operations, Revision 2, issued in response to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004- 1. This plan has been updated to identify the completed and remaining Department corrective actions to improve recruiting, developing, training, qualifying, maintaining proficiency of, and retaining technical personnel to safely accomplish DOE'S mission. The plan is approved and issued for implementation, effective

20

Enforcement actions: Significant actions resolved reactor licensees. Semiannual progress report, July 1996--December 1996  

SciTech Connect

This compilation summarizes significant enforcement actions that have been resolved during the period (July-December 1996) and includes copies of letters, Notices, and Orders sent by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to reactor licensees with respect to these enforcement actions. It is anticipated that the information in this publication will be widely disseminated to managers and employees engaged in activities licensed by the NRC, so that actions can be taken to improve safety by avoiding future violations similar to those described in this publication.

NONE

1997-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Enforcement actions: Significant actions resolved. Quarterly progress report, April--June 1993: Volume 12, No. 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This compilation summarizes significant enforcement actions that have been resolved during one quarterly period (April--June 1993) and includes copies of letters, Notices, and Orders sent by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to licensees with respect to these enforcement actions. It is anticipated that the information in this publication will be widely disseminated to managers and employees engaged in activities licensed by the NRC, so that actions can be taken to improve safety by avoiding future violations similar to those described in this publication.

Not Available

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

22

Federal Facilities Maintenance, Repair Report Calls for Action  

SciTech Connect

This article is an overview of a recent report by the Federal Facilities Council on "Predicting Outcomes from Investments in Maintenance and Repair of Federal Facilities."

Bartlett, Rosemarie

2012-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

23

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This manual establishes polices and procedures for carrying out the EPA's responsibilities to review and comment on Federal actions affecting the quality of the environment.

24

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This manual establishes policies and procedures for carrying out the Environmental Protection Agency's responsibilities to review and comment on Federal actions affecting the quality of the environment.

25

Federal-Tribal Partnership on Climate Change Action Rounds Corner, Shifts  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal-Tribal Partnership on Climate Change Action Rounds Corner, Federal-Tribal Partnership on Climate Change Action Rounds Corner, Shifts Into High Gear at 2013 Tribal Nations Conference Federal-Tribal Partnership on Climate Change Action Rounds Corner, Shifts Into High Gear at 2013 Tribal Nations Conference November 19, 2013 - 5:12pm Addthis Federal-Tribal Partnership on Climate Change Action Rounds Corner, Shifts Into High Gear at 2013 Tribal Nations Conference David Conrad David Conrad Director, Tribal and Intergovernmental Affairs The 2013 White House Tribal Nations Conference, held Wednesday, November 13 at the Department of the Interior, was a turning point in the federal-tribal partnership to combat climate change and strengthen community resilience. Secretary Moniz spoke of the importance of the relationship between the

26

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Final Rule.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

SUMMARY: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is amending its regulations in accordance with section 311(d) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005) to establish mandatory procedures requiring prospective applicants to begin the Commissions pre-filing review process at least six months prior to filing an application for authorization to site and construct a liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal. Section 311(d) of EPAct 2005, enacted on August 8, 2005, directs the Commission to promulgate such regulations within 60 days after enactment of EPAct 2005. The regulations mandatory procedures are designed to encourage applicants for LNG terminal siting and construction authority to cooperate with state and local officials, as required by EPAct 2005. The regulations also make the pre-filing process mandatory for prospective applicants for authority to construct related jurisdictional pipeline and other natural gas facilities, as defined in the regulations. The regulations also require a prospective applicant to comply with the pre-filing procedures prior to filing an application to make modifications to an existing or authorized LNG terminalDocket No. RM05-31-000-- 2--if such modifications involve significant state and local safety considerations that have

Richard Hoffmann; John Leiss; Whit Holden

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

27

Coal without carbon: an investment plan for federal action  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This study examines several technologies for CCS that are not currently receiving adequate development support but that could - in the right policy environment - provide the kind of significant cost reductions (and significant improvements in efficiency) that could greatly accelerate broad, economically attractive CCS deployment. Clean Air Task Force selected these technology areas (though not the technologies themselves) and solicited reports from experts in each field to explore how these technologies might fit into a broader CCS deployment strategy. Each expert was asked to develop a research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) 'road map' that could efficiently move each technology from the laboratory into the commercial mainstream. Because the chapter authors are either technical experts or commercial players and are not, for the most part, energy policy experts, subsequent work will translate their RD&D recommendations into actionable policy proposals. The heart of this report consists of four chapters on advanced coal and CCS technologies: underground coal gasification (UCG), written by Julio Friedmann at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory; Next generation coal gasification (surface-based gasification) led by Eric Redman at Summit Power Group; Advanced technologies for post-combustion capture (PCC) of CO{sub 2}, led by Howard Herzog at Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and RD&D to speed commercialization of geological CO{sub 2} sequestration (GCS), led by Julio Friedmann. 12 refs., 5 figs., 2 tabs.

Pettus, A.; Tatsutani, M. (eds.)

2009-09-15T23:59:59.000Z

28

Finding of no significant impact proposed corrective action for the Northeast Site at the Pinellas Plant in Largo, Florida  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-0976) of the proposed corrective action for the Northeast Site at the Pinellas Plant in Largo, Florida. The Northeast Site contains contaminated groundwater that would be removed, treated, and discharged to the Pinellas County Sewer System. Based on the analyses in the EA, the DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C.4321 et.seq. Therefore, the preparation of an environmental impact statement is not required and the DOE is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI).

NONE

1995-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

29

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Procedures for the Review of Federal and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment October 3, 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 - PURPOSE, POLICY, AND MANDATES 1. Purpose 2. Statutory Authorities 3. Policy CHAPTER 2 - MANAGEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS 1. General Responsibilities 2. Office of Federal Activities ❍ A. Federal Agency Liaisons ❍ B. Management Information Unit 3. Regional Office 4. Program Offices 5. Specific Review Management Responsibilities ❍ A. Headquarters and Regional Environmental Review Coordinators ❍ B. Principal Reviewer ❍ C. Associate Reviewer ❍ D. Consolidation of Comments 6. Routing and Lead Responsibility of EIS's and Other Federal Actions CHAPTER 3 - PRE-EIS REVIEW ACTIVITIES 1. Policy 2. General Liaison

30

Enforcement actions: Significant actions resolved, reactor licensees. Semiannual progress report, January--June 1997; Volume 16, Number 1, Part 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This compilation summarizes significant enforcement actions that have been resolved during the period (January--June 1997) and includes copies of letters, Notices, and Orders sent by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to reactor licensees with respect to these enforcement actions. It is anticipated that the information in this publication will be widely disseminated to managers and employees engaged in activities licensed by the NRC, so that actions can be taken to improve safety by avoiding future violations similar to those described in this publication.

NONE

1997-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

31

Enforcement actions: Significant actions resolved reactor licensees. Volume 14, No. 2, Part 2, Quarterly progress report, April--June 1995  

SciTech Connect

This compilation summarizes significant enforcement actions that have been resolved during one quarterly period (April--June 1995) and includes copies of letters, Notices, and Orders sent by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to reactor licensees with respect to these enforcement actions. It is anticipated that the information in this publication will be widely disseminated to managers and employees engaged in activities licensed by the NRC, so that actions can be taken to improve safety by avoiding future violations similar to those described in this publication.

NONE

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

32

FINDING OF MD SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FORMERLY UTILIZED HED/AEC SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM:  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

FINDING OF MD SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FINDING OF MD SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FORMERLY UTILIZED HED/AEC SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM: BAY0 CANYONS, NEW MEXICO Under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP), the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has proposed to carry out rcmedfrl action at a site located in Bayo Canyon, Los Alamos County, New Mexico. Although the site as partially decontaminated and decommissioned in the 196Os, there remain above-background amounts of radionuclides. DOE has determined that strontium-90 in excess of DDE's proposed remedial- action criterir exists in subsurface materials underlying an area of about 0.6 ha (1.5 acres) at the Bayo Canyon site. The proposed action is to demarcate this are8 and restrict its use to activities that will not disturb this sub-

33

MONTICELLO NPL SITES Minutes and Action Items of the Federal Facilities Agreement Meeting  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Minutes and Action Items of the Federal Facilities Agreement Meeting Minutes and Action Items of the Federal Facilities Agreement Meeting September 16 and 17,2008 Meeting Location U.S. Department of Energy Site Office, Monticello, Utah Meeting Attendees Jalena Dayvault- U.S. Department of Energy Tim Bartlett- S.M. Stoller Todd Moon- S.M. Stoller Linda Sheader- S. M. Stoller Paul Wetherstein- S.M. Stoller Brent Everett- Utah Department of Environmental Quality Duane Mortensen- Utah Department of Environmental Quality Paul Mushovic- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Rob Stites- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (participated by phone) Christina Wilson- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (participated by phone) Meeting topics and discussion points are summarized under the headings listed below. The agenda and copies of handouts presented during the meeting are attached to this report.

34

Implementation of Executive Order 12114 - Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions (46 FR 1007, January 5, 1981)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Register / Vol. 46, No. 2 / Monday, J Federal Register / Vol. 46, No. 2 / Monday, J a n u a r y 5, 1981 / Notices 1007 _ - - DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Implementation of Executive Order 121 14 Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions; Final Guideline AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Final guideline for implementation of Executive Order 12114. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy [the Department) hereby adopts final Departmental guidelines implementing - Ewcuti\ e Order 12114--En\ ironmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Artions. which was issued on Janu,lry 4. 1979. The guidelines published herein reflect certain re\ isions to the proposed guide!ines, published in the Federal Register on September 6,1979 (44 FR 521461, based upon the Department's consideration of comments received and

35

DOE/EA-1471: Environmental Assessment for the Transportation of Highly Enriched Uranium from the Russian Federation to the Y-12 National Security Complex and Finding of No Significant Impact (January 2004)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EA for the Transportation of Highly Enriched Uranium from the Russian Federation to the Y-12 National Security Complex EA for the Transportation of Highly Enriched Uranium from the Russian Federation to the Y-12 National Security Complex i FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF HIGHLY ENRICHED URANIUM FROM THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION TO THE Y-12 NATIONAL SECURITY COMPLEX ISSUED BY: United States Department of Energy ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact SUMMARY: The United States (U.S.) Department of Energy (DOE) proposes to transport highly enriched uranium (HEU) from Russia to a secure storage facility in Oak Ridge, TN. This proposed action would allow the United States and Russia to accelerate the disposition of excess nuclear weapons materials in the interest of promoting nuclear disarmament, strengthening nonproliferation, and combating terrorism. The HEU

36

Monticello NPL Sites Federal Facilities Agreement Meeting Minutes & Action Items  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

NPL Sites NPL Sites Federal Facilities Agreement Meeting Minutes & Action Items Location Monticello, Utah- DOE Office of Legacy Management field office Date September 27,2006 Attendees David Bird- Utah Department of Environmental Quality Paul Mushovic- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Att Kleinrath- U.S. Depmtment of Energy Tim Bartlett- S. M. Stoller Meeting topics and discussion points are summarized separately under the headings that follow. Attaclunent 1 to this report includes the agenda and handout materials provided at the meeting. This report also includes disposal cell and Pond 4 leachate collection data (Attachment 2), quarterly site inspection results (Attachment 3), and project schedule and deliverables through the next two qumters (October 2006 through March 2007). With this

37

History of prior federal action and NEPA documentation for NCPA Project No. 2  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The federal actions are documented that were performed to ensure environmental protection during the leasing, exploration, development and utilization of geothermal resources on those public lands of The Geysers KGRA in California associated with the proposed Northern California Power Agency (NCPA) Geothermal Project No. 2. Approval for development of these geothermal resources on public lands in The Geysers KGRA was preceded by extensive environmental analyses conducted over the past decade by the US Department of Interior, and its agencies. These analyses include the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Geothermal Leasing Program, an Environmental Analysis Record for the selected lease areas in The Geysers KGRA, and site specific Environmental Assessments. All of these documents were prepared to comply with policies, purposes, and goals of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 and pertinent state and local environmental protection standards. In addition, these documents contain the environmental protection stipulations which must be agreed to by Shell Oil Company (the geothermal steam provider) and NCPA (the electric power plant builder operator) before development and utilization can begin.

Daniels, J.I.

1979-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

38

Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (1994)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Documents Documents Federal Register Vol. 59, No. 32 Wednesday, February 16, 1994 Title 3- The President Executive Order 12898 of February 11, 1994 Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1-1.Implementation. 1-101. Agency Responsibilities. To the greatest extent practicable and per- mitted by law, and consistent with the principles set forth in the report on the National Performance Review, each Federal agency shall make achiev- ing environmental justice part of its mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environ-

39

ACTION: Environmental Assessment and Draft Finding of No Significant Impact. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Commission (NRC) has prepared an Environmental Assessment for the issuance of an Order under Section 274f of the Atomic Energy Act that would modify an Order issued to Waste Control Specialists, LLC (WCS) on November 5, 2004. In accordance with 10 CFR 51.33, the NRC has also prepared a draft Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for public review and comment. The current action is in response to a request by

Licensing Requirements For Special

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

40

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

30 30 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 214 / Friday, November 5, 1999 / Notices natural or human environment. Because no significant environmental impacts will result from implementation of the proposed action, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required and will not be prepared. The Army will not initiate the proposed action for 15 days following the completion of the EA and FNSI and publication of a public notice in a local newspaper. This EA is available for review at the following repositories: Lassen Community College Library, Highway 139, P.O. Box 3000, Susanville, CA 96130; Lassen County Public Works, 707 Nevada Street, Suite 2, Susanville, CA 96130; and the Washoe County Library, Downtown Branch, 301 South Center Street, Reno NV 89501. Dated: November 1, 1999.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Independent Oversight Targeted Review of the Safety Significant Blast Door and Personnel Door Interlock Systems and Review of Federal Assurance Capability at the Pantex Plant, December 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Targeted Review of the Targeted Review of the Safety Significant Blast Door and Personnel Door Interlock Systems and Review of Federal Assurance Capability at the Pantex Plant December 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Scope.................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background........................................................................................................................................... 2

42

Explanation of Significant Differences for the Record of Decision for Interim Actions in Zone 1, East Tennessee Technology Park, Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Zone 1 is a 1400-acre area outside the fence of the main plant at The East Tennessee Technology Park (ETTP) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The Record of Decision for Interim Actions in Zone, ETTP (Zone 1 Interim ROD) (DOE 2002) identifies the remedial actions for contaminated soil, buried waste, and subsurface infrastructure necessary to protect human health and to limit further contamination of groundwater. Since the Zone 1 Interim Record of Decision (ROD) was signed, new information has been obtained that requires the remedy to be modified as follows: (1) Change the end use in Contractor's Spoil Area (CSA) from unrestricted industrial to recreational; (2) Remove Exposure Units (EU5) ZI-50, 51, and 52 from the scope of the Zone I Interim ROD; (3) Change the end use of the duct bank corridor from unrestricted industrial to restricted industrial; and (4) Remove restriction for the disturbance of soils below 10 feet in Exposure Unit (EU) Z1-04. In accordance with 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 300.435, these scope modifications are a 'significant' change to the Zone 1 Interim ROD. In accordance with CERCLA Sect. 117 (c) and 40 CFR 300.435 (c)(2)(i), such a significant change is documented with an Explanation of Significant Differences (ESD). The purpose of this ESD is to make the changes listed above. This ESD is part of the Administrative Record file, and it, and other information supporting the selected remedy, can be found at the DOE Information Center, 475 Oak Ridge Turnpike, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. The ORR is located in Roane and Anderson counties, within and adjacent to the corporate city limits of Oak Ridge, Tennessee. ETTP is located in Roane County near the northwest corner of the ORR. ETTP began operation during World War II as part of the Manhattan Project. The original mission of ETTP was to produce enriched uranium for use in atomic weapons. The plant produced enriched uranium from 1945 until 1985. Uranium production was terminated in 1987. ORR was placed on the National Priorities List in 1989, so remediation activities are conducted under CERCLA. The primary contaminants of concern at ETTP follow: (1) In groundwater - volatile organic compounds (VOCs) at multiple locations (trichloroethene is generally the most prevalent compound); (2) In sediment - inorganic elements, radionuclides, and polychlorinated biphenyls; (3) In soil - inorganic elements, radionuclides, semivolatile organic compounds (particularly the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons), and VOCs; and (4) In facilities - radionuclides and polychlorinated biphenyls (abandoned facilities also pose a safety and health hazard to workers.) The purposes of the remedial actions selected in the Zone 1 Interim ROD are to allow unrestricted industrial use down to 10 feet and to remediate potential sources of groundwater contamination. Following is a summary of the major components of the Zone 1 Interim ROD remedy: (1) Excavation of the Blair Quarry burial area and associated contaminated soil; (2) Excavation of miscellaneous contaminated soil in the K-895 Cylinder Destruct Facility area and in the Powerhouse Area; (3) Removal of sludge and demolition of the K-710 sludge beds and Imhoff tanks; (4) Implementation of land use controls (LUCs); and (5) Characterization of soil and remediation of areas that exceed remediation levels.

Bechtel Jacobs

2011-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

43

Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Agency Coordinators...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

for Energy Action Month to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Agency Coordinators for Energy Action Month on Facebook Tweet about Federal...

44

EA-1918: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

standards for commercial and multi-family high-rise residential buildings to ASHRAE 90.1-2010 would not be a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of...

45

EA-1812: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to the Haxtun Wind Energy Project for the design, permitting, and construction of a 30 MW wind farm does not constitute a major Federal action that significantly affects the...

46

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Wibursement of $65 Million by the U . S . Department of Energy to the State of T e x a s for Construction of a Regional Medical Technology Center at the Former Superconducting Super Collider Site, Waxahachie, Texas AGENCY: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ACTION FXNDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has completed an environmental assessment @OE/EA-1090) of the proposed disbursement of $65 million to the State of Texas for construction of a Regional Medical Technology Center (RMTC) near Waxahachie, Texas. Based on the results of the analysis reported in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment

47

Finding of No Significant Impact; Energy Efficient Performance Requirements for New Federal Commercial and Residential Buildings (DOE/EA-1463) (1/11/08)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 Federal Register 7 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 8 / Friday, January 11, 2008 / Notices Energy; and provide comments and recommendations and priorities for the Department of Energy Annual Plan requirements of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Subtitle J, Section 999. Tentative Agenda: 7:30 a.m.-8 a.m. Registration 8 a.m.-12 p.m. Welcome & Introductions, Opening Remarks by the Designated Federal Officer, Update Status of the 2007 Program, Overview of 2008 Annual Plan Draft, and Overview of the National Energy Technology Laboratory Complementary Research Program. 12 p.m.-1 p.m. Lunch. 1 p.m.-4 p.m. Committee Discussions. 4 p.m.-4:30 p.m. New Business: Plans for 2008-2010 Federal Advisory Committee. 4:30 p.m.-5 p.m. Public Comments. 5 p.m. Adjourn. Public Participation: The meeting is

48

EA-1290: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

90: Finding of No Significant Impact 90: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1290: Finding of No Significant Impact Disposition of Russian Federation Titled Natural Uranium The Proposed Action to submit an export license to the NRC and then ship up to 9,000 metric tons per year of natural uranium as UF6 (Russian Federation-titled) by truck from the Portsmouth and Paducah gaseous diffusion plants to either Hampton Roads, VA or the port of Batlitnmore, MD and thence by ocean-going freighter to St. Petersburg, Russia, and to continue these shipments for up to 15 years, entails insignificant impacts and low risks. The action does not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act. Therefore, based upon

49

Federal Energy Management Program: Program Areas  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

program areas of the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) focus on specific energy management actions to help Federal agencies deploy the available technologies appropriate...

50

EA-1871: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1871: Finding of No Significant Impact Energy Efficiency Design Standards for New Federal Commercial and Multi-Family High-Rise Residential Buildings and New Federal Low-Rise Residential Buildings Based on an DOE/EA-1871, DOE has determined that revising the Federal building energy efficiency standards to ASHRAE 90.1-2007 and IECC 2009 would not be a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA. Therefore, an EIS is not required, and DOE is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact. EA-1871-FONSI-2011.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1871: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1872: Draft Environmental Assessment EA-1918: Finding of No Significant Impact

51

EA-1338: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

38: Finding of No Significant Impact 38: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1338: Finding of No Significant Impact Transfer of the Department of Energy Grand Junction Office to Non-DOE Ownership On the basis of the Environmental Assessment (EA), which analyzes the relevant environmental issues and the concerns of stakeholders, DOE finds that no significant impact would result from implementing the proposed action to transfer the facility to non-DOE ownership, or from the no action alternative. This Finding of No Significant Impact is pursuant to the NEPA of 1969, the CEQ's Regulations for Implementing NEPA, and the DOE NEPA Implementing Procedures. The proposed action does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the environment within the mandate of NEPA. Therefore, implementation of the proposed action does not

52

l lI ACTION PLAN FOR PERFORMANCE BASED SEISMIC ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Page 1. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MdANAGEVENT AGENCY FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY gl llI ACTION PLAN a FOR ...

2007-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

53

EA-1871: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EA-1871: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1871: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1871: Finding of No Significant Impact Energy Efficiency Design Standards for New Federal Commercial and Multi-Family High-Rise Residential Buildings and New Federal Low-Rise Residential Buildings Based on an DOE/EA-1871, DOE has determined that revising the Federal building energy efficiency standards to ASHRAE 90.1-2007 and IECC 2009 would not be a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA. Therefore, an EIS is not required, and DOE is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact. EA-1871-FONSI-2011.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1871: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1918: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1778: Draft Environmental Assessment

54

EA-1884: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4: Finding of No Significant Impact 4: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1884: Finding of No Significant Impact Invenergy Interconnection for the Wray Wind Energy Project, Town of Wray, Yuma County, CO Based on the information contained in the EA, Western's Federal Action would not result in significant environmental impacts. Western has determined that its action to execute an interconnection agreement to connect the proposed Project to Western's Wray Substation and to take possession of a new switchyard, and either a 4.2-or-0.75-mile double-circuit 115-kV connector line depending on the location of the new switchyard, as well as new interconnection equipment in the existing Wray Substation does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA.

55

EA-0507: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EA-0507: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-0507: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-0507: Finding of No Significant Impact Federal Aviation Agency Explosive Detection System Independent Validation and Verification Program Idaho National Engineering Laboratory The proposed action to independently test explosive detection systems for the FAA at the INEL does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA. This finding is based on the analysis in the environmental assessment. Therefore, the preparation of an environmental impact statement is not required for this proposed action. EA-0507-FONSI-1991.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-0507: Final Environmental Assessment EA-0822: Finding of No Significant Impact

56

Federal Energy Management Program: Outreach  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Awards for Leadership in Federal Energy Management, and Department of Energy (DOE) Sustainability programs. Energy Action Month: Observed in October of each year, FEMP Energy...

57

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09 09 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 93 / Friday, May 14, 1999 / Notices technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 3.03 hours per response. It is estimated that any individual may respond to synopses or market research questions 5 times per year. EPA anticipates publicizing approximately 260 contract actions per year, and conducting 3790 market research inquiries. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review

58

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

25 25 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 224 / Thursday, November 20, 1997 / Notices implementation from 8:30 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. For the rest of the day, the Council will meet with representatives from the State School-to-Work Implementation Grantees in small groups to discuss and determine strategies for addressing State sustainability issues. The meeting will close with a summary of the day's meeting and a discussion of future actions. Public Participation: The meeting on Tuesday, December 2, 1997, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. at the Renaissance Mayflower Hotel, will be open to the public. Seats will be reserved for the media. Individuals with disabilities in need of special accommodations should contact the Designated Federal Official (DFO), listed below, at least seven (7)

59

Hiring Reform Memoranda and Action Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Memoranda and Action Plan to support the Presidents mandate directing the improvement of the Federal recruitment and hiring process throughout the Federal government.

60

EA-1331: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1: Finding of No Significant Impact 1: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1331: Finding of No Significant Impact Remediation of Subsurface and Groundwater Contamination at the Rock Springs in situ Oil Shale Retort Site Based on the analysis and information provided in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed Federal action, to conduct air sparging at the Rock Springs in situ Oil Shale Retort Site in Sweetwater County, Wyoming, does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required and DOE is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact. EA-1331-FONSI-2000.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1331: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1219: Finding of No Significant Impact

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

EA-1157: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

157: Finding of No Significant Impact 157: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1157: Finding of No Significant Impact Methyl Chloride via Oxyhydrochlorination of Methane: A Building Black for Chemicals and Fuels from Natural Gas The proposed Federal action, to provide cost-shared financial assistance for demonstration of the OHC process in an engineering scale facility, does not constitute a major Federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment as defined by NEPA. This conclusion is based on the analysis contained in the EA. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required and DOE is issuing this FONSI. EA-1157-FONSI-1996.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1157: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1091: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1183: Finding of No Significant Impact

62

O&M First! Actions You Can Take Now to Save Water and Reduce...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Fact Sheet Actions You Can Take Now to Save Water and Reduce Costs Water costs can be a significant cost at federal sites, especially with rising rates across the country. As...

63

EA-1236: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

236: Finding of No Significant Impact 236: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1236: Finding of No Significant Impact Preparation for Transfer of Ownership of Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 3, Natrona County, Wyoming Based on the analysis of the Sitewide Environmental Assessment for Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 3 (NPR-3) DOE has determined that the proposed action to conduct activities in anticipation of possible transfer of NPR-3 out of Federal operation is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act. Therefore an environmental impact statement is not required and DOE is issuing this finding of no significant impact. EA-1236-FONSI-1998.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1008: Final Environmental Assessment

64

EA-1219: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

19: Finding of No Significant Impact 19: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1219: Finding of No Significant Impact Hoe Creek Underground Coal Gasification Test Site Remediation Based upon the information and analysis provided in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed Federal action, to conduct air sparging with bioremediation at the Hoe Creek Underground Coal Gasification Test Site in Campbell County, Wyoming, does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required and DOE is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact. EA-1219-FONSI-1997.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1219: Final Environmental Assessment

65

EA-1080: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

80: Finding of No Significant Impact 80: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1080: Finding of No Significant Impact Commercial Demonstration of the NOXSO SO2/NOX Removal Flue Gas Cleanup System, IN and TN The Department of Energy has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) for a project proposed by NOXSO Corporation for the cost-shared design, construction, and operation of the NOXSO SO2/NOX Removal Flue Gas Cleanup System. DOE has determined that the proposed Federal action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act. Finding of No Significant Impact for the Proposed Commercial Demonstration of the NOXSO SO2/NOX Removal Flue Gas Cleanup System, DOE/EA-1080 (June 1995) More Documents & Publications

66

EA-1091: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1: Finding of No Significant Impact 1: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1091: Finding of No Significant Impact Calderon Cokemaking Process/Demonstration Project The proposed Federal action, to provide cost-shared financial assistance for a demonstration project including the modification of an existing process demonstration unit and operation for producing metallurgical grade coke, does not constitute a major Federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment as defined by NEPA. This conclusion is based on the analysis contained in the EA. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required and DOE is issuing this FONSI. EA-1091-FONSI-1996.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1091: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1157: Finding of No Significant Impact

67

EA-1260: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

260: Finding of No Significant Impact 260: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1260: Finding of No Significant Impact Transfer of 1100 Area, Southern Rail Connection and Rolling Stock, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington Based on the analysis in the EA and comments received on the draft EA, DOE had decided that the proposed transfer of the 1100 "Area, southern rail connection, and rolling stockto a non-federal entity does not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting thequality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA. Therefore, an EIS for the proposed action is not required. EA-1260-FONSI-1998.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1260: Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact EIS-0222: Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0222: Final Environmental Impact Statement

68

EA-1918: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

18: Finding of No Significant Impact 18: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1918: Finding of No Significant Impact Energy Efficiency Design Standards for New Federal Commercial and Multi-Family High-Rise Residential Buildings (Final Rule) Based upon the EA, DOE has determined that revising the Federal building energy efficiency standards for commercial and multi-family high-rise residential buildings to ASHRAE 90.1-2010 would not be a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA. Therefore, an environmental impact statement is not required, and DOE is issuing this FONSI. EA-1918-FONSI-2013.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1918: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1871: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1872: Draft Environmental Assessment

69

Fiscal Year 2008 Annual Federal Performance Report On Executive...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Annual Federal Performance Report On Executive Agency Actions To Assist Historically Black Colleges And Universities Fiscal Year 2008 Annual Federal Performance Report On...

70

Federal Register | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Register Register Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Reference Material: Federal Register Details Activities (0) Areas (0) Regions (0) Abstract: The Office of the Federal Register informs citizens of their rights and obligations, documents the actions of Federal agencies, and provides a forum for public participation in the democratic process. The publications provide access to a wide range of Federal benefits and opportunities for funding and contain comprehensive information about the various activities of the United States Government. The Federal Register is updated daily by 6 a.m. and is published Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays, and consists of four types of entries. Presidential Documents, including Executive orders and proclamations.

71

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

21 21 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 226 / Friday, November 23, 2001 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY National Energy Technology Laboratory; Notice of Availability of a Financial Assistance Solicitation AGENCY: National Energy Technology Laboratory, Department of Energy (DOE). ACTION: Notice of availability of a financial assistance solicitation. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the intent to issue Financial Assistance Solicitation No. DE-PS26-02NT41423 entitled ''Black Liquor/Biomass Gasification Technology Support Research and Development.'' It is the intent of the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), on behalf of the Office of Industrial Technologies (OIT) in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, to solicit the submission of

72

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 17 / Thursday, January 25, 1996 / Notices Department of Energy Organization Act (Public Law 95-91), and rules and regulations issued in implementation of those Acts. Further information regarding this Advisory Board may be obtained from Rachel Murphy Samuel at (202) 586- 3279. Issued in Washington, DC, on January 18, 1996. JoAnne Whitman, Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer. [FR Doc. 96-1197 Filed 1-24-96; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450-01-P Alternative Strategies for the Long- Term Management and Use of Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride AGENCY: Department of Energy ACTION: Notice of Intent (NOI). SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) announces its intent to prepare a programmatic environmental impact statement (PEIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act

73

National Action Plan on Demand Response  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Action Plan on Demand National Action Plan on Demand Action Plan on Demand National Action Plan on Demand Response Response Federal Utilities Partnership Working Group Federal Utilities Partnership Working Group November 18, 2008 November 18, 2008 Daniel Gore Daniel Gore Office of Energy Market Regulation Office of Energy Market Regulation Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The author's views do not necessarily represent the views of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Presentation Contents Presentation Contents Statutory Requirements Statutory Requirements National Assessment [Study] of Demand Response National Assessment [Study] of Demand Response National Action Plan on Demand Response National Action Plan on Demand Response General Discussion on Demand Response and Energy Outlook

74

EA-1503: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1503: Finding of No Significant Impact 1503: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1503: Finding of No Significant Impact Vermont Electric Power Company Proposed Northern Loop Project In compliance with NEPA, DOE has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA; DOE/EA-1503), entitled Vermont Electric Power Company Proposed Northern Loop Project, to analyze the environmental impacts related to the proposed Federal action of authorizing the requested modifications to the existing PP-66 and PP-82 facilities. Based on the information contained in the EA, DOE has determined that the amendment of Presidential Permits PP-66 and PP-82, as requested in VELC0's application, would not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment and, therefore, does not require preparation of an environmental impact

75

EA-0300: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0: Finding of No Significant Impact 0: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-0300: Finding of No Significant Impact Energy Conservation Standards for New Federal Residential Buildings The Department of Energy prepared an environmental assessment (EA) of the proposed interim standards. The EA addresses the possible incremental environmental effects attributable to the application of the proposed interim standards to the design of new federal residential buildings. Based on the findings of the EA, DOE determined that the proposed interim standards do not constitute a major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, within the meaning of NEPA. Therefore, an environmental impact statement is not required. EA-0300-FONSI-1986.pdf More Documents & Publications

76

EA-1712: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2: Finding of No Significant Impact 2: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1712: Finding of No Significant Impact Exide Technologies Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Application, Bristol, Tennessee, and Columbus, Georgia Based on the analyses in the environmental assessment, DOE determined that its Proposed Action, awarding a federal grant to Exide Technologies to facilitate expansion of operations at two existing Exide facilities, would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for Exide Technoligies Electric Drive Vehicles Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Application, Bristol, TN and Columbus, GA More Documents & Publications EA-1712: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1722: Finding of No Significant Impact

77

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Requirements to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal...

78

EA-1406: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EA-1406: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1406: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1406: Finding of No Significant Impact Ground Water Compliance at the New Rifle, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site On the basis of the Environmental Assessment. which analyzed relevant environmental issues and addressed the concerns of stakeholders, DOE finds that no significant impact will result from implementing the planned action at the New Rifle site. This FONSI is documented pursuant to NEPA, the Council on Environmental Quality's "Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA" codified at 40 CFR 1500, and DOE's "NEPA Implementing Procedures" codified at IO CFR 1021. The planned action does not constitute a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the environment within the mandate of NEPA.

79

EA-1655: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5: Finding of No Significant Impact 5: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1655: Finding of No Significant Impact The Berkeley Lab Laser Accelerator (BELLA) Laser Acquisition, Installation and Use for Research and Development The Proposed Action would create and operate an experimental facility for further advancing the development of laser-driven, plasma-based, particle beam accelerators. An existing, approximately 7,000-square-foot, accelerator laboratory area inside Building 71 at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) would be modified to accommodate the new facility. DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Finding of No Significant Impact for the Berkeley Lab Laser Accelerator

80

EA-1965: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

965: Finding of No Significant Impact 965: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1965: Finding of No Significant Impact Florida Atlantic University Southeast National Marine Renewable Energy Center's Offshore Marine Hydrokinetic Technology Testing Project, Florida Based on the environmental assessment (EA), DOE finds that the proposed action is not a major federal action that constitutes a significant effect on the human environment. This finding and decision is based on the consideration of DOE's NEPA implementing regulations (40 CFR Part 1021) and Council on Environmental Quality criteria for significance (40 CFR 1508.27), both with regard to the context and the intensity of impacts analyzed in the EA. Therefore, the proposed action does not require the preparation of an environmental impact statement.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

EA-1563: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EA-1563: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1563: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1563: Finding of No Significant Impact National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stormwater Compliance Alternatives at the Savannah River Site, South Carolina The Department of Energy has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-1563) to analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed and alternative actions to protect the quality of State waters at 38 stormwater outfalls located at the Savannah River Site (SRS). Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. Finding of No Significant Impact for the National Pollutant Discharge

82

EA-1655: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

655: Finding of No Significant Impact 655: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1655: Finding of No Significant Impact The Berkeley Lab Laser Accelerator (BELLA) Laser Acquisition, Installation and Use for Research and Development The Proposed Action would create and operate an experimental facility for further advancing the development of laser-driven, plasma-based, particle beam accelerators. An existing, approximately 7,000-square-foot, accelerator laboratory area inside Building 71 at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) would be modified to accommodate the new facility. DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Finding of No Significant Impact for the Berkeley Lab Laser Accelerator

83

EA-1097: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7: Finding of No Significant Impact 7: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1097: Finding of No Significant Impact Solid waste Disposal - Nevada Test Site, Nye County, Nevada Based on the information and analysis in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action to modify the Area 23 landfill to comply with the new regulations and to close the Area 9 landfill and reopen it as Construction and Demolition debris landfill does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act. Thus, an environmental impact statement is not required to implement this action. EA-1097-FONSI-1995.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1097: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1097: Finding of No Significant Impact

84

EA-1965: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1965: Finding of No Significant Impact Florida Atlantic University Southeast National Marine Renewable Energy Center's Offshore Marine Hydrokinetic Technology Testing Project, Florida Based on the environmental assessment (EA), DOE finds that the proposed action is not a major federal action that constitutes a significant effect on the human environment. This finding and decision is based on the consideration of DOE's NEPA implementing regulations (40 CFR Part 1021) and Council on Environmental Quality criteria for significance (40 CFR 1508.27), both with regard to the context and the intensity of impacts analyzed in the EA. Therefore, the proposed action does not require the preparation of an environmental impact statement.

85

federal agency  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Federal Agency Information. ... Information on Biometric Standards. Analysis Model for Selection of Concensus Standards.

2013-07-25T23:59:59.000Z

86

EA-1716: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1716: Finding of No Significant Impact Honeywell International, Inc., Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Project Massac County, Illinois Based on the analyses in the Environmental Assessment (EA), DOE determined that its proposed action-awarding a federal greant to Honeywell International Inc. (Honeywell) for the construction of a manufacturing plant to produce a critical battery material, lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF6)- would result in no significant adverse impacts. FInding of No Significant Impact for Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Project, Honeywell International, Inc, Massac County, Illinois, DOE/EA-1716, September 2010 More Documents & Publications

87

EA-1664: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4: Finding of No Significant Impact 4: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1664: Finding of No Significant Impact Energy Conservation Standards: Energy Conservation Standards for Fluorescent and Incandescent Lamps The U.S. Department of Energy has determined that the adoption of energy conservation standards for General Service Fluorescent Lamps and Incandescent Reflector Lamps as described in the final rule titled the "energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for General Service Fluorescent Lamps and Incandescent Reflector lamps," would not be a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Finding of No Significant Impact for 10 CFR Part 430 Energy Conservation Standards: Energy Conservation Standards for Fluorescent and Incandescent

88

EA-1692: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2: Finding of No Significant Impact 2: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1692: Finding of No Significant Impact Red River Environmental Products, LLC, Construction and Start-up of an Activated Carbon Manufacturing Facility in Red River Parish, Louisiana The proposed action evaluated by the U.S. Department of Energy in this environmental assessment (EA) is to issue a loan guarantee in the amount of $245 million to Red River Environmental Products, LLC (RREP) to support construction and start-up of an Activated Carbon (AC) manufacturing facility in Red River Parish, Louisiana. The Department of Energy has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.

89

EA-0510: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0: Finding of No Significant Impact 0: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-0510: Finding of No Significant Impact High-Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (Sofc) Generator Development Project (METC) The proposed action, the Westinghouse Tubular SOFC Generator Development Project, does not constitute a major federal action normally requiring the preparation of an environmental impact statement. Based on the analysis provided in the EA, DOE determines that this action will not significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required. EA-0510-FONSI-1991.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-0510: Final Environmental Assessment WA_97_007_WESTINGHOUSE_ELECTRIC_CORPORATION_Waiver_of_Domest.pdf

90

EA-1663: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3: Finding of No Significant Impact 3: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1663: Finding of No Significant Impact British Petroleum (BP) Solar Array Project at Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York This Environmental Assessment (EA) presents an analysis of the potential environmental consequences of the United States (U.S.) Department of Energy providing access, through an easement, to BP Solar for the construction of a proposed 37 megawatt (MW) photovoltaic facility and a smaller 1-2 MW, Laboratory dedicated array at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) and compares the potential impacts to the No Action Alternative. The Department of Energy has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment

91

EA-1912: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2: Finding of No Significant Impact 2: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1912: Finding of No Significant Impact Midway-Benton No. 1 Rebuild Project, near town of Desert Aire, Benton County, WA Based on the information in the EA, as summarized here, BPA and DOE-RL determines that the Proposed Action is not a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA (42 United States Code 4321 et seq.). Therefore, an EIS will not be prepared and BPA and DOE-RL are issuing this FONSI for the Proposed Action. EA-1912-FONSI-2012.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1912: Draft Environmental Assessment EA-1912: Midway-Benton No. 1 Rebuild Project, near town of Desert Aire, Benton County, WA 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Bonneville Power Administration

92

Federal Identity Management Handbook  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Identity Management Handbook Federal Identity Management Handbook Version 0.1 December 2005 VERSION 0.1 Federal Identity Management Handbook Acknowledgements The Office of Management and Budget and the Federal Identity Credentialing Committee would like to acknowledge the significant contributions of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the Government Smart Card Interagency Advisory Board (IAB) for providing valuable contributions to the development of this handbook. A special thanks goes out to those who participated in the various workshops and provided valuable subject matter expertise and lessons learned. The comments received from other government and industry organizations are also acknowledged. VERSION 0.1 i

93

EA-1498: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

98: Finding of No Significant Impact 98: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1498: Finding of No Significant Impact Advanced Coal Utilization Byproduct Beneficiation Processing Plant Ghent Power Station, Carroll County, Kentucky The proposed Federal action is to provide funding, through a cooperative agreement with the University of Kentucky Research Foundation (UKRF), Center for Applied Energy Research (CAER), for the design, construction, and operation of an advanced coal ash beneficiation processing plant at Kentucky Utilities (KU) Ghent Power Station in Carroll County, Kentucky. Finding of No Significant Impact for Advanced Coal Utilization Byproduct Beneficiation Processing Plant Ghent Power Station, Carroll County, Kentucky, DOE/EA-1498 (December 2004) More Documents & Publications

94

EA-1916: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1916: Finding of No Significant Impact Ocean Renewable Power Company Maine, LLC Cobscook Bay Tidal Energy Pilot Project, Cobscook Bay in Washington County, Maine Based on the Final Environmental Assessment, DOE has determined that authorizing the expenditirure of federal funding to ORPC Maine to build, install, operate, and monitor a commercial-scale arry of five grid-connected TidGenTM hydrokinetic energy conversion devices on the sea floor in Cobscook Bay does not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the context of NEPA. Therefore, an EIS is not required and DOE is issuing this FONSI. EA-1916-FONSI-2012.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1916: Notice of Availability of a Finding of No Significant Impact

95

EA-1565: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

565: Finding of No Significant Impact 565: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1565: Finding of No Significant Impact Adopted Energy Conservation Standards for Distribution Transformers DOE has determined that the adoption of energy efficiency for liquid-immersed distribution transformers and medium-voltage dry-tape distribution transformers would not be a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality if the human environment. Finding of No Significant Impact: Energy Conservation Program for Commercial Equipment, Distribution Transformers More Documents & Publications Notice of Study Availability - Potential Benefits of Distributed Generation and Rate-Related Issues That May Impede Their Expansion: Federal Register Notice Volume 72, No. 40 - Mar. 1, 2007 Central Moloney: Noncompliance Determination (2013-SE-4702)

96

EA-1131: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

131: Finding of No Significant Impact 131: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1131: Finding of No Significant Impact Relocation of Neutron Tube Target Loading Operation, Los Alamos Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico The United States Department of Energy finds that there would be no significant impact from proceeding with its proposal to relocate NTTL operations from TA-21 to TA-16 at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico. DOE makes this Finding of No Significant Impact pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), the Council on Environmental Quality regulations, and the DOE NEPA regulations. Based on the environmental assessment that analyzes the relocation of operations, the proposed action does not constitute a major Federal action which would significantly affect the human environment

97

EA-1059: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1059: Finding of No Significant Impact 1059: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1059: Finding of No Significant Impact Radioactive Source Recovery Program The United States Department of Energy (DOE) finds that there would be no significant impact from proceeding with its proposal to establish a routine radioactive source recovery program at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico. DOE makes this Finding of No Significant Impact pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Council on Environmental Quality regulations, and the DOE NEPA regulations. Based on the environmental assessment that analyzes the source recovery program, the proposed action does not constitute a major Federal action which would significantly affect the human environment within the meaning of NEPA.

98

EA-1605: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1605: Finding of No Significant Impact Biomass Cogeneration and Heating Facilities at the Savannah River Site, South Carolina The Department of Energy has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-1605) to analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed construction and operation of new biomass cogeneration and heating facilities located at the Savannah River Site (SRS). DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment . Therefore, the preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required and DOE is issuing this finding of no significant impact (FONSI). Finding of No Significant Impact for Biomass Cogeneration and Heating

99

EA-1120: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

20: Finding of No Significant Impact 20: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1120: Finding of No Significant Impact Solid Residues Treatment, Repackaging and Storage at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site Based on the information and analysis in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed treatment, repackaging and storage of solid residues at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required and DOE is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact for the proposed action. EA-1120-FONSI-1996.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1120: Final Environmental Assessment EA-0995: Finding of No Significant Impact

100

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy Management...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Energy Management Program Contacts to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy Management Program Contacts on Facebook Tweet about Federal...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Categorically Excluded Actions |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA » National NEPA » National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Categorically Excluded Actions National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Categorically Excluded Actions Categorical Exclusions (CX) - Categorical exclusions are categories of actions that DOE has determined, by regulation, do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment and for which neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is typically required. Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations Part 1021, National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures, Appendices A and B to Subpart D, list DOE's categorical exclusions. Appendix A classes of actions are those actions considered to be general agency actions, such as awarding a contract or hiring personnel. Appendix B classes of actions

102

EA-1870: Mitigation Action Plan | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

70: Mitigation Action Plan 70: Mitigation Action Plan EA-1870: Mitigation Action Plan Utah Coal and Biomass Fueled Pilot Plant, Kanab, UT The Department of Energy (DOE) issues this Mitigation Action Plan (MAP) in conjunction with its Finding of No Significant Impact as to the department's proposed action of providing costshared funding for the Utah Coal and Biomass Fueled Pilot Plant Project. Based on the analyses in the Environmental Assessment (DOE/EA-1870), DOE determined that its proposed action allowing Viresco Energy, LLC (Viresco) to use federal funding to design, construct and operate a coal and biomass gasification pilot plant (pilot plant) - would not result in any significant environmental impacts. The pilot plant would evaluate the technical feasibility of using steam hydrogasification to convert coal and biomass (such as agricultural

103

EA-1933: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

33: Finding of No Significant Impact 33: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1933: Finding of No Significant Impact Yakama Nation Drop 4 Hydropower Project, Yakama Nation Reservation, WA Based on the Final EA, DOE has determined that providing federal funds to install an inline turbine on the WIP Main Canal to generate one megawatt of hydroelectric power, including design, construction, and installation of an inline turbine at Drop 4 and a power generating house, electrical substation, overhead transmission lines, and a downstream water diversion structure, would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the human quality of the human environment within the context of NEPA. Therefore, DOE is issuing this FONSI. EA-1933-FONSI-2012.pdf More Documents & Publications

104

EA-1809: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1809: Finding of No Significant Impact White Earth Nation Wind Energy Project II, Becker and Mahnomen Counties, MN DOE's Golden Field Office has determined that providing Congressionally Directed Federal Funding to the White Earth Nation to purchase and install up to four small mid-sized wind turbines at two sites near the towns of Waubun and Naytahwaush on the White Earth Reservation in Mahnomen County in western Minnesota would not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA. EA-1809-FONSI-2012.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1809: Draft Environmental Assessment EA-1809: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1809: Notice of Availability

105

EA-1916: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1916: Finding of No Significant Impact Ocean Renewable Power Company Maine, LLC Cobscook Bay Tidal Energy Pilot Project, Cobscook Bay in Washington County, Maine Based on the Final Environmental Assessment, DOE has determined that authorizing the expenditirure of federal funding to ORPC Maine to build, install, operate, and monitor a commercial-scale arry of five grid-connected TidGenTM hydrokinetic energy conversion devices on the sea floor in Cobscook Bay does not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the context of NEPA. Therefore, an EIS is not required and DOE is issuing this FONSI. EA-1916-FONSI-2012.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1916: Final Environmental Assessment

106

EA-1662: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2: Finding of No Significant Impact 2: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1662: Finding of No Significant Impact Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Certain Consumer Products (Dishwashers, Dehumidifiers, Microwave Ovens, and Electric and Gas Kitchen Ranges and Ovens) and for Certain Commercial and Industrial Equipment (Commercial Clothes Washers) This chapter describes potential environmental effects that may result from amended energy conservation standards for residential cooking products and commercial clothes washers. The Department of Energy has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Finding of No Significant Impact for 10 CFR Part 430 Energy Conservation

107

EA-1310: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10: Finding of No Significant Impact 10: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1310: Finding of No Significant Impact Decontamination and Dismantlement of the Advanced Reactivity Measurement Facility and Coupled Fast Reactivity Measurements Facility at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Based on the analysis presented in the attached EA, and on public comment received on the draft predecision EA, I have determined that the proposed action does not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Therefore, preparation of an environmental impact statement is not required. EA-1310-FONSI-2000.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1310: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1772: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1083: Final Environmental Assessment

108

EA-1676: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6: Finding of No Significant Impact 6: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1676: Finding of No Significant Impact Loan Guarantee for U.S. Geothermal's Neal Hot Springs Geothermal Facility in Vale, Oregon The U.S. Department of Energy is proposing to issue a loan guarantee to U.S Geothermal Inc. (U.S Geothermal) for construction and startup of a geothermal facility (Facility) in Vale, Oregon. The Department of Energy has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Finding of No Significant Impact for Department of Energy Loan Guarantee For U.S. Geothermal's Neal Hot Springs Geothermal Facility in Vale, Oregon, DOE/EA-1676 (December 2009)

109

EA-1682: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

682: Finding of No Significant Impact 682: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1682: Finding of No Significant Impact Upgrades and Life Extension of the 242-A Evaporator, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington, Conducted under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 This EA evaluates the potential impacts from upgrading and extending the service life of the existing 242-A Evaporator located in the 200 East Area of the Hanford Site near Richland, Washington. The Department of Energy has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Finding of no Significant Impact for the Upgrades and Life Extension of the 242-A Evaporator, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington Conducted Under the

110

EA-0881: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-0881: Finding of No Significant Impact Tank 241-c-103 Organic Vapor and Liquid Characterization and Supporting Activities, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington The proposed sampling of the vapor space and organic layer in Tank 241-C-103 and measuring of the thickness of the organic layer does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the NEPA. This finding is based on information and analysis in the EA. Therefore, an environmental impact statement is not required for this proposed action. EA-0881-FONSI-1992.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-0881: Final Environmental Assessment EA-0915: Final Environmental Assessment EA-0904: Finding of No Significant Impact

111

EA-1684: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1684: Finding of No Significant Impact Construction and Operation of the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan The U.S. Department of Energy proposes to fund the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams (FRIB) at Michigan State University (MSU). The Department of Energy has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Finding of No Significant Impact for DOE Funding of the Construction And Operation Of The Facility For Rare Isotope Beams, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, DOE/EA-1684 (September 2010) More Documents & Publications

112

EA-1146: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

46: Finding of No Significant Impact 46: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1146: Finding of No Significant Impact Radioactive Waste Storage at Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, Golden, Colorado Based on the information and analysis in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed increase in, and operation of, radioactive waste storage capacity at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site does not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 as amended. Therefore, an environmental impact statement is not required and DOE is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact for the proposed action. EA-1146-FONSI-1996.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1146: Final Environmental Assessment

113

EA-1917: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1917: Finding of No Significant Impact Wave Energy Test Facility Project, Newport, OR Based on the information presented in the Final EA, (DOE/EA-1917), and the commitment in the MAP to mitigate impacts on biological resources, including species protected under the ESA and the Marine Mammal Protection Act, to less-than-significant levels, DOE has determined that the Proposed Action will not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the context of NEPA. Therefore, the preparation of an environmental impact statement is not required, and DOE is issuing this Mitigated FONSI. EA-1917-FONSI-2012.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1917: Draft Environmental Assessment

114

EA-1705: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1705: Finding of No Significant Impact Construction and Operation of a Proposed Cellulosic Biorefinery, Mascoma Corporation, Kinross Charter Township, Michigan The frontier Project consists of the design, construction and operation of a biorefinery producing ethanol and other co-products from cellulosic materials utilizing a proprietary pretreatment and fermentation process. The Department of Energy has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Finding of No Significant Impact for the Construction and Operation of a Proposed Cellulosic Biorefinery, Mascoma Corporation, Kinross Charter

115

EA-1648: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8: Finding of No Significant Impact 8: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1648: Finding of No Significant Impact White Earth Nation Wind Energy Project, Becker County, Minnesota, White Earth Indian Reservation, U.S.A. This Congressionally Directed Funding would allow the White Earth Nation to build on the findings of a prior DOE First Steps grant in developing available wind resources. DOE has determined that this action would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Finding of No Significant Impact for the White Earth Nation Wind Energy Project Becker County, Minnesota, White Earth Indian Reservation, U.S.A., DOE/EA-1648 (April 2009) More Documents & Publications EA-1648: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1809: Notice of Availability

116

EA-1651: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1651: Finding of No Significant Impact U-233 Material Downblending and Disposition Project at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee This environmental assessment (EA) evaluates the impacts of planned activities to modify selected Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) facilities; process the ORNL inventory of uranium-233 (U-233); and transport the processed material to a long-term disposal facility. Based on the results of the analyses reported in the Final EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the context of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. Finding of No Significant Impact for U-233 Material Downblending and

117

EA-1486: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

486: Finding of No Significant Impact 486: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1486: Finding of No Significant Impact Methow Valley Irrigation District Project, East and West Diversion Screening Proposal Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has proposed to fund fish screen replacements at the Methow Valley Irrigation District's (MVID's) East and West Diversion canals, both located near Twisp, Washington, in Okanogan County. BPA has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act. Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) Methow Valley Irrigation District Project East and West Diversion Screening Project, DOE/EA-1486 (March 2004) More Documents & Publications

118

EA-1682: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2: Finding of No Significant Impact 2: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1682: Finding of No Significant Impact Upgrades and Life Extension of the 242-A Evaporator, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington, Conducted under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 This EA evaluates the potential impacts from upgrading and extending the service life of the existing 242-A Evaporator located in the 200 East Area of the Hanford Site near Richland, Washington. The Department of Energy has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Finding of no Significant Impact for the Upgrades and Life Extension of the 242-A Evaporator, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington Conducted Under the

119

EA-1336: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

336: Finding of No Significant Impact 336: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1336: Finding of No Significant Impact Ocean Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide Field Experiment This Finding of No Significant Impact is made pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 [42 U.S. Code 4321 et seq.]; the Council on Environmental Quality's Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA, Title 40 CFR, Part 1500-1508; and the DOE's NEPA Implementing Procedures, Title 10 CFR, Part 1021. The Proposed action does not constitute a major Federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required and DOE is issuing this FONSI. EA-1336-FEA-2001

120

EA-1535: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1535: Finding of No Significant Impact Uranium Leasing Program U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management prepared the Uranium Leasing Program Programmatic Environmental Assessment (PEA) (DOE/EA-1535) to evaluate its management alternatives for the future of DOE's Uranium Leasing Program (ULP). Based on the analyses in the final PEA, I have determined that the proposed action does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Finding of No Significant Impact for the Uranium Leasing Program, DOE/EA-1535 (July 2007) More Documents & Publications EA-1535: Final Programmatic Environmental Assessment EIS-0472: Notice of Intent to Prepare a Programmatic Environmental Impact

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

EA-1672: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2: Finding of No Significant Impact 2: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1672: Finding of No Significant Impact Basin Electric Power Cooperative Culbertson Combustion Turbine Generator Project Western Area Power Administration proposes to modify its transmission system to accommodate new generation resources from the peaking facility into the transmission system. Basin Electric would own and operate the peaking facility and associated features. The Department of Energy has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Finding of No Significant Impact, Culbertson Combustion Turbine Generator Project, Montana, DOE/EA-1672 (June 2009)

122

EA-1676: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

676: Finding of No Significant Impact 676: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1676: Finding of No Significant Impact Loan Guarantee for U.S. Geothermal's Neal Hot Springs Geothermal Facility in Vale, Oregon The U.S. Department of Energy is proposing to issue a loan guarantee to U.S Geothermal Inc. (U.S Geothermal) for construction and startup of a geothermal facility (Facility) in Vale, Oregon. The Department of Energy has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Finding of No Significant Impact for Department of Energy Loan Guarantee For U.S. Geothermal's Neal Hot Springs Geothermal Facility in Vale, Oregon, DOE/EA-1676 (December 2009)

123

EA-1770: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1770: Finding of No Significant Impact Photovoltaic Solar Project at the Durango, Colorado Site Based on the information and analysis in the EA, LM has determined that its Preferred Action (Alternative 2) will not constitute a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Finding of No Significant Impact Photovoltaic Solar Project at the Durango, Colorado, Disposal Site, La Plata County, DOE/EA 1770 (June 2011) More Documents & Publications EA-1770: Final Environmental Assessment 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Legacy Management (LM) 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Office of Legacy Management (LM), Grand

124

EA-1606: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

606: Finding of No Significant Impact 606: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1606: Finding of No Significant Impact Proposed Use of Savannah River Site Lands for Military Training, SC DOE prepared an environmental assessment to analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed use of Savannah River Site lands and facilities for military training. Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA. Therefore, the prepation of an environmental impact statement is not required and DOE is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1606-FONSI-2011.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1606: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1606: Draft Environmental Assessment

125

EA-1660: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0: Finding of No Significant Impact 0: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1660: Finding of No Significant Impact Combined Community Communications Facility and Infrastructure Cleanup on the Fitzner/Eberhardt Arid Lands Ecology Reserve, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington The Environmental Assessment (EA) provides information and analyses of proposed U.S. Department of Energy activities associated with consolidating existing communications operations and removing excess facilities and infrastructure within the Fitzner/Eberhardt Arid Lands Ecology Reserve (ALE) at the Hanford Site near the City of Richland, Washington. DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Finding of No Significant Impact for the Combined Community Communications

126

EA-1483: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

483: Finding of No Significant Impact 483: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1483: Finding of No Significant Impact Decontamination and Decommissioning of the Juggernaut Reactor at Argonne National Laboratory-East Argonne, Illinois DOE has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA), DOE/EA-1483, evaluating the decontamination and decommissioning of the Juggernaut Reactor at Argonne National Laboratory-East (ANL-E), in Argonne, Illinois. Based on the analysis in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). Finding of No Significant Impact for the Proposed Decontamination and Decommissioning of the Juggernaut Reactor at Argonne National Laboratory -

127

EA-1211: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

211: Finding of No Significant Impact 211: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1211: Finding of No Significant Impact Relocation and Storage of Isotopic Heat Sources, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington Based on the analysis in the EA (DOE/EA-1211), and after considering preapproval review comments of the State of Washington and the Yakama Indian Nation, I conclude that the proposed Relocation and Storage of Isotopic Heat Sources at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA. Therefore, an EIS for the proposed action is not required. EA-1211-FONSI-1997.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1211: Final Environmental Assessment EA-0915: Finding of No Significant Impact

128

DOE/EA-1792 Finding of No Significant Impacts  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE/EA-1792 DOE/EA-1792 Finding of No Significant Impacts Page 2 of 12 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: The Final EA examines the potential environmental impacts of DOE's Proposed Action of authorizing UMaine to expend Federal funding to perform research on and development of floating offshore wind turbine platforms as well as a No Action Alternative, under which DOE would not authorize the UMaine to spend Federal funds on the proposed project. DOE assumed, for purposes of the EA, that UMaine would not conduct the offshore research and development of floating wind turbines without such financial assistance. The primary objective of UMaine testing the one-third scale floating wind turbines is to obtain motion and structural response data to compare and validate numerical models

129

Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Sustainable Sustainable Federal Fleets to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Operations & Maintenance Greenhouse Gases Water Efficiency Data Center Energy Efficiency Industrial Facilities Sustainable Federal Fleets Laboratories for the 21st Century Institutional Change

130

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution -  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix, Arizona on AddThis.com... Energy-Efficient Products Technology Deployment

131

H. R. 1271: A Bill to authorize appropriations for the Office of Environmental Quality for fiscal years 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, and 1996; to ensure consideration of the impact of Federal actions on the global environment; and for other purposes, introduced in the House of Representatives, One Hundred Second Congress, First Session, March 5, 1991  

SciTech Connect

This bill was introduced into the US House of Representatives on March 5, 1991 to amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. The objective of the bill is to authorize appropriations for the Office of Environmental Quality for fiscal years 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, and 1996. In addition, it will ensure consideration of the impact of federal actions on the global environment.

1991-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

132

EO 13211: Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 22, 2001 / Presidential Documents Executive Order 13211 of May 18, 2001 Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect En- ergy Supply, Distribution, or Use By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to appropriately weigh and consider the effects of the Federal Government's regulations on the supply, distribution, and use of energy, it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. Policy. The Federal Government can significantly affect the supply, distribution, and use of energy. Yet there is often too little information regarding the effects that governmental regulatory action can have on energy. In order to provide more useful energy-related information and hence im-

133

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09 09 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 99 / Thursday, May 22, 1997 / Notices collection on the respondents, including through the use of information technology. Dated: May 16, 1997. Gloria Parker, Director, Information Resources Management Group. Office of Management Type of Review: New. Title: Department of Education Federal Cash Award Certification Statement and Department of Education Federal Cash Quarterly Confirmation Statement. Frequency: Annually. Affected Public: Business or other for- profit; Not for Profit institutions; Federal Government; State, Local or Tribal Government, SEAs or LEAs. Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour Burden: Responses: 12,000. Burden Hours: 38,160. Abstract: The collection of the Federal Cash Award Statement is necessary for the Agency to monitor cash advanced to

134

Federal Register  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

151 151 Rules and Regulations Federal Register Vol. 60, No. 203 Friday, October 20, 1995 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed to and codified in the Code of Federal IRegulations, which is published under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1610. The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each week. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Western Area Power Administration 10 CFR Part 905 Energy Planning and Management Program AGENCY: Western Area Power Administration, DOE. A cmoN: Final rule. summARv: The Western Area Power Administration is publishing this final rule to adopt an Energy Planning and

135

EA-1905: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1905: Finding of No Significant Impact The DOE CBFO reviewed the BLM EA and found that the analysis adequately covered all areas of concern, but did not include a discussion of intentional destructive acts, which it is DOE policy to include in all of its EAs (DOE Memorandum, from the Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance to the DOE NEPA Community, December 1, 2006). Therefore, DOE is including a discussion of intentional destructive acts in this FONSI. Based on the analysis in the EA, and the additional analysis in this FONSI, DOE has determined that funding the proposed action does not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human or physical environment within the meaning of the National Environmental

136

EA-1488: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

488: Finding of No Significant Impact 488: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1488: Finding of No Significant Impact U-233 Disposition, Medical Isotope Production, and Building 3019 Complex Shutdown at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee The U. S. Department of Energy has completed an Environmental Assessment (EA) [DOE/EA-1488] that evaluates the processing of uranium-233 (233U) stored at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and other small quantities of similar material currently stored at other DOE sites in order to render it suitable for safe, long-term, economical storage. Based on the results of the analysis reported in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the

137

EA-1634: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4: Finding of No Significant Impact 4: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1634: Finding of No Significant Impact Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Seismic Life-Safety Modernization, and Replacement of General Purpose Buildings, Phase 2B The U.S. Department of Eneregy has completed an Environmental Assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-1634) for the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Seismic Life-Safety Modernization, and Replcaement of General Purpose Buildings, Phase 2B. Seventeen comment letters were received and addressed in the Final EA. Based on the analysis in the EA including the responses to the comments, DOE has determined that the Proposed Action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of

138

EA-1570: Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Assessment and Finding of No Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1570: Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Construction and Operation of Neutrinos at the Main Injector Off-Axis Electron Neutrino Appearance Experiment (NOvA) at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, and St. Louis County, Minnesota This Environmental Assessment (DOE/EA-1570) provides information and analysis of proposed U.S. Department of Energy activities associated with constructing and operating facilities for a new neutrino physics research program called NOvA. DOE has determined that the proposed action doesn't constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Finding of No Significant Impact for Construction and Operation of

139

EA-0981: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EA-0981: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-0981: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-0981: Finding of No Significant Impact Solid Waste Retrieval Complex, Enhanced Radioactive and Mixed Waste Storage Facility, Infrastructure Upgrades, and Central Waste Support Complex, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington Based on the analysis in the EA, and after considering the preapproval review comments of the State of Washington, the Nez Pierce Tribe, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, I conclude that the proposed action to initiate the proposed waste retrieval, the waste storage activities, the infrastructure upgrades, and the construction and operation of the CWSC does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA. Therefore,

140

EA-1905: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5: Finding of No Significant Impact 5: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1905: Finding of No Significant Impact The DOE CBFO reviewed the BLM EA and found that the analysis adequately covered all areas of concern, but did not include a discussion of intentional destructive acts, which it is DOE policy to include in all of its EAs (DOE Memorandum, from the Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance to the DOE NEPA Community, December 1, 2006). Therefore, DOE is including a discussion of intentional destructive acts in this FONSI. Based on the analysis in the EA, and the additional analysis in this FONSI, DOE has determined that funding the proposed action does not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human or physical environment within the meaning of the National Environmental

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

EA-1634: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

34: Finding of No Significant Impact 34: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1634: Finding of No Significant Impact Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Seismic Life-Safety Modernization, and Replacement of General Purpose Buildings, Phase 2B The U.S. Department of Eneregy has completed an Environmental Assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-1634) for the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Seismic Life-Safety Modernization, and Replcaement of General Purpose Buildings, Phase 2B. Seventeen comment letters were received and addressed in the Final EA. Based on the analysis in the EA including the responses to the comments, DOE has determined that the Proposed Action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of

142

Federal Energy Management Program: Publications  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Energy Action Month Frequently Asked Questions Energy Action Month Frequently Asked Questions The Federal Energy Management Program's frequently asked questions (FAQs) database features answers to common Energy Action Month queries. Contact the Webmaster to suggest a new question or topic. To find answers to available FAQs, select a topic from the drop-down menu. Select One... Fleet Management Energy Action Month Energy Efficient Product Procurement Training Renewable Energy Technology Deployment Better Buildings Federal Award Type in a search term or phrase, AND/OR select a category, then click SEARCH.(Leave the text box blank and press SEARCH to return all results in the category.) Search by keyword or phrase: Exact Phrase All Words Any Word AND/OR Select a category: All Categories Promoting Energy Action Month

143

EA-1800: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1800: Finding of No Significant Impact Monarch Warren County Wind Turbine Project Lenox Township Warren County, Illinois The U.S. Department of Energy provided Federal funding appropriated under the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act 0(2009 to the Illinois Department ofComrnerce and Economic Opportunity (DeEO) under the State Energy Program (SEP). DeEO proposes to provide approximately $5 million of its SEP funds to Monarch Wind Power (MWP) for the Monarch Warren County Wind Turbine Project (MWTP). DOE's Proposed Action is to authorize the expenditure of Federal funding under State Energy Program to design, permit, and construct a l2·turbine, 19.2 megawatt wind energy facility south of Monmouth, Illinois. Each wind turbine would have a hub height of

144

AGENCY: ACTION: DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ACTION: ACTION: DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Preparation for Transfer of Ownership of Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 3 Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the Transfer of Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 3 (DOE/EA-1236) SUMMARY: The Secretary of Energy is authorized to produce the Naval Petroleum Reserves No. 3 (NPR-3) at its maximum efficient rate (MER) consistent with sound engineering practices, for a period extending to Apr115 2000 subject to extension. Production at NPR-3 peaked in 1981 and has declined since until it has become a mature stripper field, with the average well yielding less than 2 barrels per day. The Department of Energy (DOE) has decided to discontinue Federal operation of NPR-3 at the end of its life

145

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Interagency Energy...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Meetings to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Interagency Energy Management Task Force Meetings on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management...

146

Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact: Widening Trench 36 of the 218-E-12B Low-Level Burial Ground, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect

This environmental assessment was prepared to assess potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed action to widen and operate unused Trench 36 in the 218-E-12B Low-Level Burial Ground for disposal of low-level waste. Information contained herein will be used by the Manager, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, to determine if the Proposed Action is a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. If the Proposed Action is determined to be major and significant, an environmental impact statement will be prepared. If the Proposed Action is determined not to be major and significant, a Finding of No Significant Impact will be issued and the action may proceed. Criteria used to evaluate significance can be found in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations 1508.27. This environmental assessment was prepared in compliance with the ''National Environmental Policy Act of1969'', as amended, the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of ''National Environmental Policy Act'' (Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations 1500-1508), and the U.S. Department of Energy Implementing Procedures for ''National Environmental Polio Act'' (Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations 1021). The following is a description of each section of this environmental assessment. (1) Purpose and Need for Action. This section provides a brief statement concerning the problem or opportunity the U.S, Department of Energy is addressing with the Proposed Action. Background information is provided. (2) Description of the Proposed Action. This section provides a description of the Proposed Action with sufficient detail to identify potential environmental impacts. (3) Alternatives to the Proposed Action. This section describes reasonable,alternative actions to the Proposed Action, which addresses the Purpose and Need. A No Action Alternative, as required by Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations 1021, also is described. (4) Affected Environment. This section provides a brief description of the locale in which the Proposed Action would take place. (5) Environmental Impacts. This section describes the range of environmental impacts, beneficial and adverse, of the Proposed Action. Impacts of alternatives briefly are discussed. (6) Permits and Regulatory Requirements. This section provides a brief description of permits and regulatory requirements for the Proposed Action. (7) Organizations Consulted. This section lists any outside groups, agencies, or individuals contacted as part of the environmental assessment preparation and/or review. (8) References. This section provides a list of documents used to contribute information or data in preparation of this environmental assessment.

N /A

1999-02-11T23:59:59.000Z

147

Findings of No Significant Impact (FONSI) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Services » NEPA Documents » Findings of No Significant Impact Services » NEPA Documents » Findings of No Significant Impact (FONSI) Findings of No Significant Impact (FONSI) Findings of No Significant Impact are public documents issued by a Federal agency briefly presenting the reasons why an action for which the agency has prepared an environmental assessment will not have a significant effect on the human environment and, therefore, will not require preparation of an environmental impact statement. If you have any trouble finding a specific document, please contact AskNEPA@hq.doe.gov for assistance. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD October 9, 2002 EA-1434: Finding of No Significant Impact Sunrise II Water Supply Line, Kern County, California October 2, 2002 EA-1449: Finding of No Significant Impact Commercial Demonstration of the Manufactured Aggregate Processing

148

EA-0923: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

923: Finding of No Significant Impact 923: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-0923: Finding of No Significant Impact Winnett School District Boiler Replacement Project Based on the analysis in the Environmental Assessment, the Department has determined that the installation of a new coal-fired system at the Winnett School District Complex does not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the NEPA. Therefore, the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement is not required and the Department is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact. EA-0923-FONSI-1993.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-0923: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1183: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-0962: Finding of No Significant Impact

149

EA-1714: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4: Finding of No Significant Impact 4: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1714: Finding of No Significant Impact Toda America, Incorporated, Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Project, Battle Creek, Michigan Based on the analyses in the Environmental Assessment, DOE determined that it;s proposed action, awarding a Federal grant to Toda America, Incorporated for the construction of a new manufacturing plant, would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Project Toda America, Incorporated Battle Creek, Michigan More Documents & Publications EA 1714: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1711: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1709: Finding of No Significant Impact

150

EA-1714: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EA-1714: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1714: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1714: Finding of No Significant Impact Toda America, Incorporated, Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Project, Battle Creek, Michigan Based on the analyses in the Environmental Assessment, DOE determined that it;s proposed action, awarding a Federal grant to Toda America, Incorporated for the construction of a new manufacturing plant, would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Project Toda America, Incorporated Battle Creek, Michigan More Documents & Publications EA 1714: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1711: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1678: Finding of No Significant Impact

151

Strengthening Federal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Jan. 24 Jan. 24 / Administration of George W. Bush, 2007 Executive Order 13423- Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management January 24, 2007 By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and to strengthen the environmental, energy, and transpor- tation management of Federal agencies, it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. Policy. It is the policy of the United States that Federal agencies conduct their environmental, transportation, and en- ergy-related activities under the law in sup- port of their respective missions in an envi- ronmentally, economically and fiscally sound, integrated, continuously improving, efficient, and sustainable manner. Sec. 2. Goals for Agencies. In imple-

152

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

44 44 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 12, 1996 / Notices will be issued this fall in accordance with the reallocation procedures contained in the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA). Under section 442(e) of the HEA, unexpended FWS funds returned to the Secretary must be reallocated to eligible institutions that used at least 10 percent of the total FWS Federal funds granted to the institution to compensate students employed in community services. Because reallocated FWS funds will be distributed on the basis of fair share shortfall criteria, institutions must also have a fair share shortfall to receive these funds. Institutions must use all the reallocated FWS Federal funds to compensate students employed in community services. To ensure

153

EA-1725: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5: Finding of No Significant Impact 5: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1725: Finding of No Significant Impact SBE, Inc. Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Application, Power Ring Manufacturing Scale-up, Barre, Vermont Based on the analyses in the Environmental Assessment, DOE determined that its proposed action, awarding a federal grant to SBE Inc. to establish an advanced Direct Current Bus capacitor manufacturing facility, would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for SBE, Inc. Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Application Barre, Vermont More Documents & Publications EA-1725: Final Environmental Assessment Vermont Recovery Act State Memo EA-1722: Finding of No Significant Impact

154

Findings of No Significant Impact (FONSI) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Services » NEPA Documents » Findings of No Significant Impact Services » NEPA Documents » Findings of No Significant Impact (FONSI) Findings of No Significant Impact (FONSI) Findings of No Significant Impact are public documents issued by a Federal agency briefly presenting the reasons why an action for which the agency has prepared an environmental assessment will not have a significant effect on the human environment and, therefore, will not require preparation of an environmental impact statement. If you have any trouble finding a specific document, please contact AskNEPA@hq.doe.gov for assistance. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD November 13, 2013 EA-1965: Finding of No Significant Impact Florida Atlantic University Southeast National Marine Renewable Energy Center's Offshore Marine Hydrokinetic Technology Testing Project, Florida

155

EA-1711: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EA-1711: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1711: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1711: Finding of No Significant Impact Saft America, Inc. Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Application, Jacksonville, Florida Based on the analyses in the environmental assessment, DOE determined that its proposed action, awarding a federal grant to Saft America, Inc to construct and operate a high-volume manufacturing plant to make advanced lithium-ion cells and batteries, would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for Saft America, Inc. Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Application, Jacksonville, Florida More Documents & Publications EA-1711: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1709: Finding of No Significant Impact

156

EA-1255: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1255: Finding of No Significant Impact 1255: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1255: Finding of No Significant Impact Project Partnership Transportation of Foreign-Owned Enriched Uranium from the Republic of Georgia Based on the analysis in the Environmental Assessment for Project Partnership, and based on the previous Environmental Assessment (DOE/EA-1006) and Finding of No Significant Impact for Project Sapphire, DOE has determined that the transportation of about 5 kilograms of enriched uranium nuclear fuel from the Republic of Georgia to the United Kingdom does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the human environment. Therefore, an environmental impact statement is not required. EA-1255-FONSI-1998.pdf More Documents & Publications EA- 1255: Finding of No Significant Impact

157

EA-1802: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1802: Finding of No Significant Impact Chicago View Wind Project Chicago Heights, Cook County, Illinois The Department of Energy's Proposed Action is to authorize the expenditure of Federal funding appropriated under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 to design, permit, and construct the Chicago View Wind Project, a 1.5-megawatt wind turbine that would be sited on top of a construction debris landfill in Chicago Heights, southern Cook County, Illinois. Finding of No Significant Impact Chicago View Wind Project, Chicago Heights, Cook County, Illinois, DOE/EA-1802 (February 2011) More Documents & Publications EA-1802: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1807: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1753: Finding of No Significant Impact

158

EA-1711: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1: Finding of No Significant Impact 1: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1711: Finding of No Significant Impact Saft America, Inc. Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Application, Jacksonville, Florida Based on the analyses in the environmental assessment, DOE determined that its proposed action, awarding a federal grant to Saft America, Inc to construct and operate a high-volume manufacturing plant to make advanced lithium-ion cells and batteries, would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for Saft America, Inc. Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Application, Jacksonville, Florida More Documents & Publications EA-1711: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1709: Finding of No Significant Impact

159

EA-1087: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

87: Finding of No Significant Impact 87: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1087: Finding of No Significant Impact Proposed Induction Linac System Experiments in Building 51B at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California Based on the information and analysis in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposal to construct and operate the Induction Linac System Experiments project does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Therefore, a Finding of No Significant Impact is made and an Environmental Impact Statement is not required. EA-1087-FONSI-1995.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1087: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1065: Finding of No Significant Impact

160

EA-1065: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5: Finding of No Significant Impact 5: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1065: Finding of No Significant Impact Proposed Construction and Operation of a Genome Sequencing Facility in Building 64 at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, California Based on the information and analysis in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposal to construct and operate the Genome Sequencing Facility does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Therefore, a Finding of No Significant Impact is made and an Environmental Impact Statement is not required. EA-1065-FONSI-1995.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1065: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1087: Finding of No Significant Impact

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

EA- 1255: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1255: Finding of No Significant Impact 1255: Finding of No Significant Impact EA- 1255: Finding of No Significant Impact Project Partnership Transportation of Foreign-Owned Enriched Uranium from the Republic of Georgia Based on the analysis in this EA for Project Partnership, and based on the previous EA and Finding of No Significant Impact for Project Sapphire, the DOE has determined that the transportation of about 5 kilograms of enriched uranium nuclear fuel from the Republic of Georgia to the United Kingdom does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required. EA-1255-FONSI-1998.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1255: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1255: Final Environmental Assessment

162

EIS-0412: Federal Loan Guarantee to Support Construction of the...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Texas Overview The Department of Energy is assessing the potential environmental impacts for its proposed action of issuing a Federal loan guarantee to TX Energy, LLC (TXE)....

163

Federal Register Notice  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

810 Federal Register 810 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 39 / Monday, February 28, 2011 / Proposed Rules Determination of Petition For reasons discussed above, the NRC denies PRM-51-13. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 16th day of February 2011. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Michael F. Weber, Acting Executive Director for Operations. [FR Doc. 2011-4347 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Part 61 [NRC-2011-0043] Public Workshop to Discuss Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Public Workshop and Request for Comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), in coordination with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), plans to conduct a workshop to discuss possible approaches to revising

164

2009 Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) Corrective...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

NW, Suite 700 Washington D.C. 20004-2901 Dear Mr. Chairman: Enclosed is the Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) Corrective Action Plan, Revision 2, which is Deliverable...

165

Emergencies and Emergency Actions | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Emergencies and Emergency Actions Emergencies and Emergency Actions Emergencies and Emergency Actions Selected documents on the topic of Emergencies and Emergency Actions under NEPA. May 12, 2010 Memorandum for Heads of Federal Departments and Agencies: Emergencies and NEPA With this Memorandum, the Council on Environmental Quality reiterates its previous guidance on the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environmental review of proposed emergency response actions.This memorandum clarifies that the previous guidance remains applicable to current situations and provides guidance on required agency environmental review. September 8, 2005 Memorandum for Federal NEPA Contacts: Emergency Actions and NEPA This Council on Environmental Quality memorandum provides general information on (1) the response to hurricane Katrina;

166

Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Facility Energy Facility Energy Checklist to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Checklist on AddThis.com... Project Assistance Training Outreach Awards for Saving Energy Energy Action Month FAQs Facility Checklist Home Energy Checklist Office Checklist Energy Coordinators Commit to Efficiency Facility Energy Checklist This checklist outlines actions that conserve energy within facilities.

167

EA-0962: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

62: Finding of No Significant Impact 62: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-0962: Finding of No Significant Impact Construction and Routine Operation of a 12-kilovolt Overhead Powerline and Formal Authorization for a 10-inch and 8-inch Fresh Water Pipeline Right-of-Way at Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 1, Kern County, California Based on the analysis in the Assessment, the Department has determined that the proposed construction and operation of the 12-kilovolt overhead powerline and authorization of the fresh water pipelines right-of-way on and adjacent to the Reserve do not constitute major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required, and the Department is issuing this Finding of No Significant

168

EA-1723: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1723: Finding of No Significant Impact General Motors LLC Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Application, White Marsh, Maryland, and Wixom, Michigan Based on the analyses in the environmental assessment, DOE determined that its proposed action - awarding a federal grant to General Motors, LLC to establish a second-generation Global Rear-Wheel Electric drive unit components facilities - would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for General Motors, LLC Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Application White Marsh, Maryland and Wixom, Michigan More Documents & Publications EA-1723: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1723: Draft Supplemental Environmental Assessment

169

EA-1740: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

740: Finding of No Significant Impact 740: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1740: Finding of No Significant Impact Thermal Energy Corporation Combined Heat and Power Project Houston, Texas DOE completed the Final Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Thermal Energy Corporation Combined Heat and Power Project, Houston, Texas (DOE/EA-1740). Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE determined that its proposed action-awarding a federal grant to the Thermal Energy Corporation (TECO) to facilitate installationg of a combined heat and power (CHP) system at the Texas Medical Center's district power plant in Houston, Texas-would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No SIgnificant Impact and Floodplain Statement of FIndings for the Thermal Energy Corporation Combined Heat and Power Project, Houston,

170

EA-1760: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1760: Finding of No Significant Impact FutureFuel Chemical Company Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Project, Batesville, Arkansas Based on the analyses in the Environmental Assessment, DOE determined that its proposed action, awarding a federal grant to FutureFuel Chemical Company, to partially fund the design, installation and operations of a commercial-scale plant to produce intermediate anode material for high-performance lithium-ion batteries would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Project Futurefuel Chemical Company Batesville, Arkansas More Documents & Publications

171

EA-1673: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3: Finding of No Significant Impact 3: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1673: Finding of No Significant Impact Energy Conservation Program for Certain Industrial Equipment: Energy Conservation Standards and Test Procedures for Commercial Heating, Air-Conditioning, and Water-Heating Equipment Based upon the environmental assessment, DOE has determined that the adoption of the amended energy conservation standards for commercial packaged boilers and new energy conservation standards for water-cooled and evaporatively-cooled commercial package air conditioners and heat pumps with a cooling capacity at or above 240,000 Btu/h and less than 760,000 Btu/h would not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Finding of No Significant Impact: Energy Conservation Program for Certain

172

EA-1740: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0: Finding of No Significant Impact 0: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1740: Finding of No Significant Impact Thermal Energy Corporation Combined Heat and Power Project Houston, Texas DOE completed the Final Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Thermal Energy Corporation Combined Heat and Power Project, Houston, Texas (DOE/EA-1740). Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE determined that its proposed action-awarding a federal grant to the Thermal Energy Corporation (TECO) to facilitate installationg of a combined heat and power (CHP) system at the Texas Medical Center's district power plant in Houston, Texas-would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No SIgnificant Impact and Floodplain Statement of FIndings for the Thermal Energy Corporation Combined Heat and Power Project, Houston,

173

EA-1925: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1925: Finding of No Significant Impact Midnight Point and Mahogany Geothermal Exploration Projects, Glass Buttes, Oregon Based on the final EA, DOE finds that providing federal funding for the Proposed Projects is not a major action that constitutes a significant effect on the human environment. This finding and decision is based on the consideration of DOE's NEPA implementing regulations (10 CFR Part 1021) and the CEQ's criteria for significance (40 CFR 1508.27), both with regard to the context and the intensity of impacts analyzed in the EA. Accordingly, the Proposed Projects do not require the preparation of an EIS. EA-1925-FONSI-2013.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1925: Draft Environmental Assessment EA-1925: Final Environmental Assessment

174

EA-1756: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6: Finding of No Significant Impact 6: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1756: Finding of No Significant Impact Battelle Memorial Institute's Smart Grid Project at the City of Ellensburg's Renewable Energy Park, Kittitas County, Washington Based on the analysis in the environmental assessment, DOE determined that the proposed action - providing federal assistance to Battelle Memorial Institute to facilitate the installaion of 540 additional solar panels, 10 solar concentrating modules, and 8 small wind energy generating systems at the City of Ellensburg's Renewable Energy Park - would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for the Battelle Memorial Institute's Smart Grid Project at the City of Ellensburg's Renewable Energy Park, Kittitas County, Washington

175

EA-1685: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1685: Finding of No Significant Impact Experimental Coal Flow Program at Clemson University The Western Area Power Administration (Western) is the lead Federal agency responsible for preparing the EA. Based on findings and analysis in the environmental assessment (EA), Western has determined that with the resource protection measures, the Parker-Planet Tap 69-kV Transmission Line would not result in any significant environmental impacts. The EA provides the basis for decisions on whether the effects to land, visual, water, biological, and cultural resources, as well as socioeconomic conditions, would be significant. Environmental Assessment for Parker-Planet Tap 69-kV Transmission Line Rebuild, Upgrade and Right-Of-Way Action, DOE/EA-1685 (June 2010) Finding

176

EA-1743: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3: Finding of No Significant Impact 3: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1743: Finding of No Significant Impact Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. Waste Energy Project at the AK Steel Corporation Middletown Works, Middletown, Ohio Based on the analyses in the environmental assessment, DOE determined that its proposed action - awarding a federal grant to Air Products and Chemicals, Inc to facilitate construction and operation of a waste energy recovery plant at the AK Steel Corporation Middletown Works - would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for the Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. Waste Energy Project at the AK Steel Corporation Middletown Works, Middletown, Ohio More Documents & Publications EA-1743: Final Environmental Assessment Project_Descriptions_ITP_ARRA_Awards.xls

177

EA-1775: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

775: Finding of No Significant Impact 775: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1775: Finding of No Significant Impact Texas A&M University Combined Heat and Power Project, College Station, Texas DOE completed the Final Environmental Assessment for the Texas A&M University Combined Heat and power Project, College Station, Texas (DOE/EA-1775). Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE determined that its proposed action-awarding a federal grant to Texas A&A University to facilitate installatino and operation of a high-efficiency combined heat and power system that would produce steam for heating and cooling as well as generate electricity-would result in no significant adverse impacts. FInding of No Significant Impact for the Txas A&M University Combined Heat and power Project, College Station, Texas

178

EA-0912: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

12: Finding of No Significant Impact 12: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-0912: Finding of No Significant Impact Urgent-Relief Acceptance of Foreign Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel Based on the analysis in the Environmental Assessment, and after careful consideration of comments received, DOE has determined that the acceptance of up to 409 spent nuclear fuel elements from eight foreign research reactors in Europe for storage at the Savannah River Site does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required, and DOE issues this Finding of No Significant Impact. EA-0912-FONSI-1994.pdf More Documents & Publications

179

EA-0970: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

70: Finding of No Significant Impact 70: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-0970: Finding of No Significant Impact Environmental Safety and Health Analytical Laboratory Project No. 94-AA-01 Pantex Plant Amarillo, TX Based on the information contained in the Environmental Assessment, the DOE determines that the construction and operation of the Environmental Safety and Health Analytical Laboratory at Pantex Plant and demolition of the existing Analytical Chemistry Laboratory does not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required. EA-0970-FONSI-1995.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-0970: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1533: Finding of No Significant Impact

180

EA-1635: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5: Finding of No Significant Impact 5: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1635: Finding of No Significant Impact Williston to Tioga Transmission Line Project, North Dakota Basin Electric Power Cooperative (BEPC) proposes to construct and operate a new 230-kilovolt (kV) transmission line to meet existing and future electric power requirements in northwestern North Dakota, and to interconnect this new transmission line to the Western Area Power Administration's (Western) transmission system. The EA identified no potentially significant impacts to environmental resources resulting from either Western's Federal action or Basin Electric's Proposed Project. Finding of No Significant Impact for Williston to Tioga Transmission Line Project Pre-Approval Review, DOE/EA-1635 (May 2010) More Documents & Publications

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

EA-1785: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

785: Finding of No Significant Impact 785: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1785: Finding of No Significant Impact Phase III Anthropogenic Test Characterization Project, Mobile County, Alabama Based on the analyses in the environmental assessment, DOE determined that its proposed action - awarding a federal grant to Southeast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership to inject 125,000 tons of carbon dioxide per year for three years into a deep saline aquifer - would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for Southeast regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership Phase III Anthropogenic Test Project Citronelle, Alabama More Documents & Publications EA-1785: Final Environmental Assessment Geologic Carbon Dioxide Storage Field Projects Supported by DOE's Sequestration Program

182

EA-1754: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1754: Finding of No Significant Impact Public Service Company of New Mexico, Photovoltaic Plus Battery for Simultaneous Voltage Smoothing and Peak Shifting Project, Bernalillo County, New Mexico Based on the analysis in the environmental assessment, DOE determined that the proposed action - providing federal asssitance to Public Service Company of New Mexico to facilitate the installation of an advanced absorbed valve-regulated lead acid battery for voltage smoothing and peak shifting - would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for the Public Service Company of New Mexico Photovoltaic Plus Battery for Simultaneous Voltage Smoothing and Peak Shifting Project, Bernalillo County, New Mexico

183

EA-1188: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1188: Finding of No Significant Impact Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and Santa Fe Energy Resources, Inc. Midway Valley 3D Seismic Project, Kern County, California Based on the results of the analysis in the Assessment, the Department of Energy has determined that the proposed 3-dimensional seismic survey does not constitute a major federal action that significantly affects the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required, and the Department of Energy is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact. EA-1188-FONSI-1999.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1188: Final Environmental Assessment CX-009523: Categorical Exclusion Determination

184

EA-1635: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

635: Finding of No Significant Impact 635: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1635: Finding of No Significant Impact Williston to Tioga Transmission Line Project, North Dakota Basin Electric Power Cooperative (BEPC) proposes to construct and operate a new 230-kilovolt (kV) transmission line to meet existing and future electric power requirements in northwestern North Dakota, and to interconnect this new transmission line to the Western Area Power Administration's (Western) transmission system. The EA identified no potentially significant impacts to environmental resources resulting from either Western's Federal action or Basin Electric's Proposed Project. Finding of No Significant Impact for Williston to Tioga Transmission Line Project Pre-Approval Review, DOE/EA-1635 (May 2010) More Documents & Publications

185

EA-1745: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1745: Finding of No Significant Impact Blast Furnace Gas Flare Capture Project at the ArcelorMittal USA, Inc., Indiana Harbor Steel Mill, East Chicago, Indiana Based on the analyses in the environmental assessment, DOE determined that its proposed action - awarding a federal grant to ArcelorMittal USA, Inc. to facilitate construction and operation of a boiler system that would convert blast furnace waste gas into electricity - would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for the Blast Furnace Gas Flare Capture Project at the Arcelormittal USA, Inc. Indiana Harbor Steel Mill, East Chicago, Indiana More Documents & Publications EA-1745: Final Environmental Assessment Project_Descriptions_ITP_ARRA_Awards.xls

186

EA-1742: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1742: Finding of No Significant Impact Rhode Island LFG Genco, LLC Combined Cycle Electricity Generation Plant Fueled by Landfill Gas, Johnston, Rhode Island Based on the analyses in the Environmental Assessment, DOE determined that its proposed action - awarding a federal grant to Rhode Island LFG Genco, LLC to facilitate expansion of an existing landfill gas collection system and construction and operation of a combined cycle landfill gas-to-electricity generating plant - would result in no significant adverse impacts. Finding of No Significant Impact for the Rhode Island LFg Genco, LLC Combined Cycle Electricity Generation Plant Fueled by Landfill Gas Johnston, Rhode Island More Documents & Publications EA-1742: Final Environmental Assessment

187

EA-1922: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1922: Finding of No Significant Impact Combined Power and Biomass Heating System, Fort Yukon, Alaska Based on the EA, DOE finds that providng federal funding for the Proposed Project is not a major action that constituents a significant effect on the human environment. This finding and decision is based on the consideration of DOE's NEPA implementing regulations (10 CFR Part 1021) and CEQ's criteria for significance (40 CFR 1508.27), both with regard to the context and the intensity of impacts analyzed in trhe EA. Accordingly, the Proposed Project does not require the preparation of an environmental impact statement. EA-1922-FONSI-2013.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1922: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1922: Draft Environmental Assessment

188

EA-1775: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1775: Finding of No Significant Impact Texas A&M University Combined Heat and Power Project, College Station, Texas DOE completed the Final Environmental Assessment for the Texas A&M University Combined Heat and power Project, College Station, Texas (DOE/EA-1775). Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE determined that its proposed action-awarding a federal grant to Texas A&A University to facilitate installatino and operation of a high-efficiency combined heat and power system that would produce steam for heating and cooling as well as generate electricity-would result in no significant adverse impacts. FInding of No Significant Impact for the Txas A&M University Combined Heat and power Project, College Station, Texas

189

Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact: Kalina Geothermal Demonstration Project Steamboat Springs, Nevada  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) to provide the DOE and other public agency decision makers with the environmental documentation required to take informed discretionary action on the proposed Kalina Geothermal Demonstration project. The EA assesses the potential environmental impacts and cumulative impacts, possible ways to minimize effects associated with partial funding of the proposed project, and discusses alternatives to DOE actions. The DOE will use this EA as a basis for their decision to provide financial assistance to Exergy, Inc. (Exergy), the project applicant. Based on the analysis in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human or physical environment, within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. Therefore, the preparation of an environmental impact statement is not required and DOE is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI).

N /A

1999-02-22T23:59:59.000Z

190

Meeting Federal Energy Security Requirements  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Markel Markel SRA International Lawrence_Markel@sra.com Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Fall 2012 - October 16-17 Mobile, AL Sponsored by Alabama Power Theme Meeting energy security requirements in federal facilities provides opportunities for additional types of cooperation between utilities and the federal agencies. However, there are significant barriers to pursuing these opportunities - constraints on utilities and on federal agencies, as well as sometimes-competing objectives. Energy security encompasses sufficiency, surety, and sustainability.  Above all, energy security means having adequate power to conduct critical operations for the duration required (sufficiency).  Secondarily, and leading to sufficiency, is ensuring resilient energy supplies that are accessible when

191

Federal Energy Management Program: News  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

News News Subscribe to RSS News Feed RSS Feed icon December 17, 2013 Energy Department Announces Winner of the 2013 Better Buildings Federal Award Competition The Energy Department today announced that the General Services Administration's (GSA) United States Court House in Wichita, Kansas is the winner of the 2013 Better Buildings Federal Award. More December 5, 2013 Presidential Memorandum on Federal Leadership on Energy Management In the latest step under his Climate Action Plan, President Obama today signed a Memorandum directing the Federal Government to consume 20 percent of its electricity from renewable sources by 2020 - more than double the current level. More December 3, 2013 Obama Administration Expands Better Buildings Challenge to Multifamily Housing, Launches New Programs to Boost U.S. Energy Efficiency

192

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

901 901 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 1, 2004 / Notices As a result of this dispute, the SLA requested the Secretary of Education to convene a Federal arbitration panel to hear this complaint. A panel was convened, and a hearing on this matter was held on May 13, 2002. Arbitration Panel Decision The arbitration panel heard the following issue: whether the Army's alleged failure to negotiate with the SLA in good faith for the full food services and dining facility attendant services contract at Ft. Campbell, Kentucky, constituted a violation of the Act (20 U.S.C. 107 et seq.) and the implementing regulations in 34 CFR part 395. After considering the evidence presented, the majority of the panel ruled that the Act clearly covers all

193

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

32 32 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 15, 1999 / Notices that the original selection list would remain in effect. The complainant requested review of the SLA's stipulated decision by a Federal arbitration panel. The panel was convened on April 17, 1998. Arbitration Panel Decision The issue before the arbitration panel was whether the SLA's stipulated decision to make a determination concerning the continuation of the special assignment process at the time a military base became available was inconsistent with the ALJ's determination. The arbitration panel ruled that, at the time a military base contract became available, there may be a compelling reason that would benefit both the program and the complainant that would justify not assigning complainant

194

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

66 66 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 142 / Friday, July 24, 1998 / Notices Dated: July 16, 1998. Richard D. Wilson, Acting Assistant Administrator. [FR Doc. 98-19832 Filed 7-23-98; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ER-FRL-5494-1] Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments Availability of EPA comments prepared July 6, 1998 Through July 10, 1998 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities AT (202) 564-5076. An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published

195

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 47 / Friday, March 8, 1996 / Notices Comment date: March 18, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E at the end of this notice. 13. Benjamin F. Montoya [Docket No. ID-2945-000] Take notice that on February 23, 1996, Benjamin F. Montoya (Applicant) tendered for filing an application under Section 305(b) of the Federal Power Act to hold the following positions: President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Public Service Company of New Mexico, a New Mexico corporation Director, Northwest Corporation Comment date: March 15, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E at the end of this notice. 14. Montana Power Company [Docket No. TX96-6-000] Take notice that on February 26, 1996, Montana Power Company (MPC) tendered for filing an application

196

Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds This Environmental Protection Agency report contains recommendations for a series of environmental actions, including those to increase environmental and economically beneficial landscaping practices at Federal facilities and federally funded projects. Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds More Documents & Publications Pollution Prevention - Environmental Impact Reduction Checklists for NEPA/309 Reviewers Memorandum to Heads of Federal Departments and Agencies Regarding Pollution Prevention and the National Environmental Policy Act Executive Order 13148-Greening the Government Through Leadership in

197

Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds This Environmental Protection Agency report contains recommendations for a series of environmental actions, including those to increase environmental and economically beneficial landscaping practices at Federal facilities and federally funded projects. Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practices on Federal Landscaped Grounds More Documents & Publications Pollution Prevention - Environmental Impact Reduction Checklists for NEPA/309 Reviewers Memorandum to Heads of Federal Departments and Agencies Regarding Pollution Prevention and the National Environmental Policy Act EIS-0488: EPA Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact

198

Federal Energy Management Program: Sustainable Federal Fleets  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Fleets Federal Fleets The Federal Fleet Program Overview outlines FEMP services and assistance available to Federal fleet managers to increase the use of alternative fuels and advanced vehicles. FEMP's Sustainable Federal Fleets website provides guidance and assistance to help implement Federal legislative and regulatory requirements mandating reduced petroleum consumption and increased alternative fuel use. FEMP's efforts include assisting agencies with implementing and managing energy-efficient and alternative fuel vehicles and facilitating a coordinated effort to reduce petroleum consumption and increase alternative fuel use annually. Content on Sustainable Federal Fleets spans Federal requirements and reporting compliance, alternative fuels and advanced vehicles, fleet performance data, analysis services, information resources, and FEMP contacts.

199

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy Efficiency...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Guidance and Requirements for Fluorescent Tube Lamps to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy Efficiency Acquisition Guidance and Requirements...

200

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Interagency Energy...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

About the Program Site Map Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Interagency Energy Management Task Force to someone by...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy Efficiency...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Energy Efficiency Acquisition Guidance and Requirements for Residential Electric Resistance Water Heaters to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program:...

202

EA-1921: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1: Finding of No Significant Impact 1: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1921: Finding of No Significant Impact Silver Peak Area Geothermal Exploration Project, Esmeralda County, NV Based on the evaluations in the final EA and subject to the mitigations imposed by BLM and DOE, DOE has determined that no significant impact on the human environment would occur as a result of DOE's proposed action to provide a $4.47 million federal grant and Rockwood's proposed project to explore for a geothermal resource that could support the production of electricity that would serve the lithium processing plant owned by Rockwood. Therefore, preparation of an EIS is not required, and DOE is issuing this FONSI. EA-1921-FONSI-2012.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1921: Final Environmental Assessment

203

EA-1753: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

753: Finding of No Significant Impact 753: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1753: Finding of No Significant Impact Beacon Power Corporation Flywheel Frequency Regulation Plant, Chicago Heights, Illinois Based on the analyses in the environmental assessment (EA), DOE determined that its proposed action--awarding a federal grand to Beacon Power Corporation (Beacon Power) to facilitate installation and operation of a 20-megawatt flywheel frequency regulation plant--would result in no significant adverse impacts. DOE further determined that the proposed project could result in beneficial impacts o the nation's energy efficiency and air quality. Operating the flywheel plant could result in a decrease in carbon dioxide emissions from regional power plants. In addition, there would be small positive socioeconomic impacts from the expenditures for the

204

EA-1887: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7: Finding of No Significant Impact 7: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1887: Finding of No Significant Impact Renewable Fuel Heat Plant Improvements at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado (DOE/EA-1573-S1) Based on the information presented in the Final SEA (DOE/EA-1573-S1), DOE has determined that the RFHP improvements and expansion of the sourcing of woody biomass fuels from Front Range sources to additional available regional sources do not constitute major federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment in the context of NEPA. Therefore, an EIS is not required, and DOE is issuing this FONSI. EA-1573-SEA-FONSI-2012.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1887: Supplemental Environmental Assessment EA-1573-S1: Proposed Renewable Fuel Heat Plant Improvements at the National

205

EA-1753: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3: Finding of No Significant Impact 3: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1753: Finding of No Significant Impact Beacon Power Corporation Flywheel Frequency Regulation Plant, Chicago Heights, Illinois Based on the analyses in the environmental assessment (EA), DOE determined that its proposed action--awarding a federal grand to Beacon Power Corporation (Beacon Power) to facilitate installation and operation of a 20-megawatt flywheel frequency regulation plant--would result in no significant adverse impacts. DOE further determined that the proposed project could result in beneficial impacts o the nation's energy efficiency and air quality. Operating the flywheel plant could result in a decrease in carbon dioxide emissions from regional power plants. In addition, there would be small positive socioeconomic impacts from the expenditures for the

206

EA-1175: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EA-1175: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1175: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1175: Finding of No Significant Impact Proposed Title Transfer of East Tennessee Technology Park Land and Facilities Based on the findings of DOE/EA-1175, DOE has determined that the proposed expansion of DOE's Reindustrialized Program to lease of land and facilities at East Tennessee Technology Park does not constitute a major Federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the context of the National Environmental Policy Act. Therefore, preparation of an environmental impact statement is not required. EA-1175-FONSI-1997.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-1175: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1415: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1175: Final Environmental Assessment (Addendum)

207

EA-1833: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1833: Finding of No Significant Impact The City of El Dorado Wind Energy Project, El Dorado, Butler County, Kansas The U.S. Department of Energy's Proposed Action is to authorize the expenditure of federal funding appropriated under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to design, permit and construct the El Dorado Wind Energy Project, a 1.0 megawatt wind turbine to be located immediately west of the El Dorado Wetlands and Water Reclamation Facility in El Dorado, Butler County, Kansas. Finding of No Significant Impact and Floodplain Statement of Findings for the City of El Dorado Wind Energy Project, El Dorado, Butler County, Kansas, DOE/EA-1833 (February 2011) More Documents & Publications EA-1833: Final Environmental Assessment

208

EA-1815: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1815: Finding of No Significant Impact Cuyahoga County Agricultural Society Wind Energy Project, Berea, Cuyahoga County, Ohio The Department of Energy's proposed action is to authorize the expenditure of Federal funding appropriated under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to design, permit, and construct the Cuyahoga County Agricultural Society Wind Energy Project, a 660 kilowatt wind turbine at Cuyahoga County Fairgrounds in the center of the fairgrounds complex on 164 Eastland Road, Berea, Ohio. Finding of No Significant Impact Cuyahoga County Agricultural Society Wind Energy Project, Berea, Cuyahoga County, Ohio, DOE/EA-1815 (February 2011) More Documents & Publications EA-1815: DOE Notice of Availability of the

209

EA-1886: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1886: Finding of No Significant Impact Big Sky Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership - Phase III: Large Volume CO2 Injection-Site Characterization, Well Drilling, and Infrastructure Development, Injection, MVA, and Site Closure, Kevin Dome, Toole County, Montana Based on the findings of this EA and after careful consideration of all public and agency comments, DOE has determined that its proposed action of providing $63.8 million in the form of cost-shared federal funding and MSU's construction and operation of the Big Sky Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership Phase III: Kevin Dome Carbon Storage Project would not significantly affect the quality of the human environment. Therefore, preparation of an environmental impact statement is not

210

EA-1178: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8: Finding of No Significant Impact 8: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1178: Finding of No Significant Impact 300 Area Steam Plant Replacement, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington Based on the analysis in the EA, and considering the comments from the Benton County Clean Air Authority and the State of Washington, I conclude that the proposed replacement of the centralized heating system with heating units for individual buildings or groups of buildings, constructing new natural gas pipelines to provide a fuel source for many of these units, construction of a central control building or conversion of an existing building to operate and maintain the system, and rerouting backup electrical lines and relocating air compressors does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment

211

EA-1495: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5: Finding of No Significant Impact 5: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1495: Finding of No Significant Impact USEC Inc. American Centrifuge Lead Cascade Facility at Piketon, Ohio The purpose of NRC's proposed action is to authorize possession and use of source and special nuclear material at the Lead Cascade in Piketon, Ohio. Finding of No Significant Impact for the United States Enrichment Corporation Incorporated, American Centrifuge Lead Cascade Facility at Piketon, Ohio More Documents & Publications EIS-0468: Final Environmental Impact Statement Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-021 Report on the Effect the Low Enriched Uranium Delivered Under the Highly Enriched Uranium Agreement Between the USA and the Russian Federation has on the Domestic Uranium Mining, Conversion, and Enrichment Industries and

212

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

893 893 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 158 / Friday, August 15, 2003 / Notices Title: Comprehensive Program Annual Performance Report. Frequency: One time. Affected Public: Not-for-profit institutions. Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour Burden: Responses: 140. Burden Hours: 2,800. Abstract: The Comprehensive Program is a discretionary grant program that makes competitive awards to support reform and innovations through projects that improve educational practice at the postsecondary level. Grantees annually submit a performance report to demonstrate that substantial progress is being made toward meeting the objectives of their projects. Reporting requirements are currently based on broad criteria from the Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR). This request is to

213

Federal Register Notices Archive  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Federal Register Notice of TIP 2009 Competition ...more. White Papers: Federal Register Notice Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request ...

2011-04-12T23:59:59.000Z

214

Federal Register Notices  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Federal Register Notice of 2010 TIP Competition ...more. White Papers: Federal Register Notice Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request ...

2011-04-25T23:59:59.000Z

215

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE FUTURE LOCATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

30, 2002 DOEIEA-1438 . 30, 2002 DOEIEA-1438 . FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE FUTURE LOCATION OF HEAT SOURCEfRADIOISOTOPE POWER SYSTEM: ASSEMBLY AND TEST OPERATIONS CURRENTLY LOCATED AT THE MOUND SITE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (the Department) has completed an Environmental Assessment for the Future Location of the Reat SourcelRadioisotope Power System Assembly and Test Operations Currently Located at the Mound Site. Based on the analysis in the environmental assessment, the Department has determined that the proposed action, the relocation of the Department's heat source and radioisotope power system operations, does not constitute' a major Federal action significantly affecting the

216

EA-0826: Revised Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

26: Revised Finding of No Significant Impact 26: Revised Finding of No Significant Impact EA-0826: Revised Finding of No Significant Impact Natural Resource Management Activities at the Savannah River Site, Aiken, SC The Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office (SR) prepared an environmental assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-0826) in 1993 to analyze the potential environmental impacts of continued management of natural resources at the Savannah River Site (SRS) located near Aiken, South Carolina. Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE-SR determined that the proposed action was not a major Federal action significantly affecting the human environment within the meaning of NEPA, and for that reason issued a finding of no significant impact (FONSI) dated July 15, 1993. Revised Finding of No Significant Impact for the Natural Resource

217

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 220 / Friday, November 14, 2003 / Notices 1 Because the plants' refueling schedules determine the availability for lead assembly use, Duke Power Company has submitted a license amendment request to the NRC to allow irradiation of MOX lead assemblies at Catawba. The SA also analyzes the use of the McGuire Nuclear Station (McGuire) in North Carolina, which could be used in lieu of Catawba, if a license amendment request were submitted and approved. SUMMARY: The Leader, Regulatory Information Management Group, Office of the Chief Information Officer, invites comments on the proposed information collection requests as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before January

218

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

57 57 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 22, 2005 / Notices shall include a detailed explanation of the dispute. Upon the other Manager's receipt of such notice, that Manager shall have 15 working days to provide to the disputing Party a written answer to the notice and explanation. The notice and answer, including any exhibits thereto, shall be the Record of Dispute. After such 15-day period has expired, the Managers shall make their best efforts to resolve the dispute within 20 working days. C. If the Managers do not resolve the dispute within 20 days, the dispute will be elevated to FWS's Regional Director and DOE's Rocky Flats Manager or successor. Within 30 working days of receiving the Record of Dispute, they shall confer and attempt to resolve the

219

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

13 13 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 223 / Friday, November 19, 1999 / Notices numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 15. The EPA would like to solicit comments to: (i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (iv) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated electronic,

220

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

78 78 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 17, 2005 / Notices requirements and practices for institutions participating in the Title IV, Higher Education Act (HEA) programs. The public is alerted that this package is a request for an extension of a currently approved collection. Until the anticipated reauthorization of the Higher Education Act and any resulting changes to the implementing regulations, the existing paperwork collection is simply extended, rather than revised. Requests for copies of the proposed information collection request may be accessed from http://edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting the ''Browse Pending Collections'' link and by clicking on link number 2853. When you access the information collection, click on ''Download Attachments'' to view.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

87 87 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 173 / Thursday, September 5, 1996 / Notices of burden accurate, (4) how might the Department enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected, and (5) how might the Department minimize the burden of this collection on the respondents, including through the use of information technology. Dated: August 29, 1996. Gloria Parker, Director, Information Resources Group. Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Type of Review: New. Title: Guidance on the Goals 2000 Amendments (Draft). Frequency: One-time submission. Affected Public: State, local or Tribal Gov't, SEAs or LEAs. Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour Burden: Responses: 30 Burden Hours: 3,000 Abstract: The Omnibus Consolidated Rescissions and Appropriations Act of

222

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

04 04 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 130 / Monday, July 8, 2002 / Notices Background The claim in question arose when the Department's Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education (Assistant Secretary) issued a program determination letter (PDL) on March 26, 1997. The PDL demanded a refund of $1,846,718 of funds provided to the PRDE for school years 1991-92 and 1992-93 under Chapter 1 of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 2701 et seq. (1988)). Specifically, the Assistant Secretary found that the PRDE had used Chapter 1 funds to assess the educational needs of all public and private school children in violation of statutory and regulatory requirements that permitted the use of those funds only for programs designed to meet the

223

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

90 90 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 173 / Thursday, September 5, 1996 / Notices written comments concerning (1) the scope of the EIS, (2) the issues the EIS should address, and (3) the alternatives the EIS should analyze. Please address written comments to Mr. Grainger at the address indicated above. These comments should be postmarked by November 1, 1996 to ensure full consideration. Organizations and individuals wishing to participate in the public meeting can call 1-800-242-8269 between 8:30 AM and 5:00 PM Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, or submit their requests to Mr. Grainger at the address indicated above. DOE requests that anyone who wishes to speak at the scoping meeting preregister by contacting Mr. Grainger, either by phone or in writing. Preregistration

224

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2266 2266 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 86 / Thursday, May 3, 2001 / Notices The States eligible to apply for incentive grant awards, and the amount they are eligible to receive are Florida, $2,645,125; Indiana, $1,308,726; Kentucky, $1,400,631; Texas, $3,000,000; Utah, $882,167; and Vermont $843,351. The six eligible States must submit their applications for incentive funding to the Department of Labor by June 18, 2001. As set forth in the provisions of WIA section 503(b)(2), and 20 CFR 666.220(b), the application must include assurances that: A. The legislature of the State was consulted with respect to the development of the application. B. The application was approved by the Governor, the eligible agency for adult education (as defined in section 203 of WIA), and the State agency

225

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

07 07 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2004 / Notices assessment; and (f) environmental statistics. Process and Deadline for Submitting Nominations Any interested person or organization may nominate individuals qualified in the areas of expertise described above to serve on the Subcommittee. Nominations should be submitted in electronic format through the Form for Nominating Individuals to Panels of the EPA Science Advisory Board provided on the SAB Web site, http:// www.epa.gov/sab. The form can be accessed through a link on the blue navigational bar on the SAB Web site, http://www.epa.gov/sab. To be considered, all nominations must include the information required on that form. Anyone who is unable to submit nominations using this form, and any

226

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

247 247 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 138 / Wednesday, July 17, 1996 / Notices by the Secretary of Commerce. The purpose of this meeting is to review the 1996 Award applications and to select applications to be considered in the site visit stage of the evaluation. The applications under review contain trade secrets and proprietary commercial information submitted to the Government in confidence. DATES: The meeting will convene August 7, 1996, at 8:00 a.m. and adjourn at 5:00 p.m. on August 7, 1996. The entire meeting will be closed. ADDRESS: The meeting will be held at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Administration Building, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Harry Hertz, Director for Quality Programs, National Institute of

227

Federal Programs  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Local government agencies are often the first places where homeowners seek financial assistance for mortgage relief. These requests come at a time when municipalities are facing increasing budgetary demands and diminishing revenues. With unemployment at an all time high and worsening economic conditions, the foreclosure crisis is not likely to abate in the near future. Due to the deep and spreading nationwide foreclosure crisis, Congress has enacted legislation that authorizes agencies in the federal government and national organizations to develop or expand programs to intervene and to assist borrowers by revising and guaranteeing loan agreements. Additionally, large financial institutions and banks are absorbing assets of failed entities and creating programs for homeowners to work out new loan terms. This document provides summaries of the major program offerings to borrowers by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development ( HUD), Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, NeighborWorks, large banks, and financial institutions that have clients nation-wide.

Hope For Homeowners Program

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

228

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09 09 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 1997 / Notices Information Officer, publishes this notice containing proposed information collection requests at the beginning of the Departmental review of the information collection. Each proposed information collection, grouped by office, contains the following: (1) Type of review requested, e.g., new, revision, extension, existing or reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of the collection; (4) Description of the need for, and proposed use of, the information; (5) Respondents and frequency of collection; and (6) Reporting and/or Recordkeeping burden. ED invites public comment at the address specified above. Copies of the requests are available from Patrick J. Sherrill at the address specified above. The Department of Education is

229

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 51 / Tuesday, March 16, 2004 / Notices meeting and will be provided opportunities to speak following previously scheduled speakers. Speakers will be requested to limit their initial comments to about five minutes. Speakers who need more than five minutes should indicate the length of time desired in their request. Depending on the number of speakers, DOE may need to limit speakers to five minutes initially but will provide additional opportunities as time permits. Speakers may also provide written materials to supplement their presentations. Oral and written comments will be given equal consideration. DOE will begin the meeting with an overview of the proposed Low-Emission Boiler System Project. The meeting will not be conducted as an evidentiary

230

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

146 146 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 122 / Friday, June 23, 2000 / Notices instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. EPA estimates that the changes discussed today, when implemented, will reduce burden by 23,000 hours and an insignificant number of dollars. Dated: June 14, 2000. Elizabeth Cotsworth, Director, Office of Solid Waste.

231

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

139 139 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 23, 2004 / Notices EIS until March 31, 2004. Once scoping ended, BPA revised the Scoping Summary to reflect all comments received, and republished the summary on April 7, 2004. Based on the results of the public scoping conducted for the Transmission Policy-Level EIS and internal considerations such as the current and most recently projected activities of BPA's Transmission Business Line and budget issues, BPA has decided that continued consideration of a comprehensive policy for BPA's transmission business is not in the best interests of the agency at this time. As a result, it is no longer necessary to proceed with preparation of the Transmission Policy-Level EIS. Therefore, BPA is issuing this notice of

232

Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

35245 35245 Vol. 77, No. 114 Wednesday, June 13, 2012 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Rural Utilities Service 7 CFR Part 1700 RIN 0572-AC23 Substantially Underserved Trust Areas (SUTA) AGENCY: Rural Utilities Service, USDA. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Rural Utilities Service (RUS) is issuing regulations related to loans and grants to finance the construction, acquisition, or improvement of infrastructure projects in Substantially Underserved Trust Areas (SUTA). The intent is to implement Section 306F of the Rural Electrification Act by providing the process by which eligible applicants may apply for funding by the agency. DATES: Effective: July 13, 2012. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michele Brooks, Director, Program Development and Regulatory Analysis,

233

EO 13212: Actions To Expedite Energy-Related Projects | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2: Actions To Expedite Energy-Related Projects 2: Actions To Expedite Energy-Related Projects EO 13212: Actions To Expedite Energy-Related Projects The increased production and transmission of energy in a safe and environmentally sound manner is essential to the well-being of the American people. In general, it is the policy of this Administration that executive departments and agencies (agencies) shall take appropriate actions, to the extent consistent with applicable law, to expedite projects that will increase the production, transmission, or conservation of energy. EO 13212: Actions To Expedite Energy-Related Projects More Documents & Publications Executive Order 13212 - Actions To Expedite Energy-Related Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 66, No. 99 - May 18, 2001 EO 13211: Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,

234

EA-1194: Finding of No Significant Impact (Revised) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

194: Finding of No Significant Impact (Revised) 194: Finding of No Significant Impact (Revised) EA-1194: Finding of No Significant Impact (Revised) Expansion and Operation of the Central Shops Borrow Pit, Savannah River Site The Department of Energy prepared an environmental assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-1194) in 1997 for the expansion and operation of the existing Central Shops Borrow Pit (i.e., SRS Facility 632-G) at the Savannah River Site (SRS), located near Aiken, South Carolina. Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE determined that the action was not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of National Environmental Policy Act. Revised Finding of No Significant Impact for Expansion and Operation of the Central Shops Borrow Pit at the Savannah River Site

235

EA-1070: Revised Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

70: Revised Finding of No Significant Impact 70: Revised Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1070: Revised Finding of No Significant Impact Natural Fluctuation of Water Level in Par Pond and Reduced Water Flow in Steel Creek below L Lake at the Savannah River Site The Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) for the proposed natural fluctuation of water level in Par Pond, and reduced water flow in Steel Creek below L Lake at the Savannah River Site near Aiken, South Carolina. Based on analyses in the EA, DOE determined that the proposed action was not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act. Revised Finding of No Significant Impact for the Natural Fluctuation of Water Level in Par Pond and Reduced Water Flow in Steel Creek below L Lake

236

Environmental Assessment of Remedial Action at the Riverton Uranium Mill Tailings Site, Riverton, Wyoming  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an environmental assessment (DOE/EA-0254) on the proposed remedial action at the inactive uranium milling site near Riverton, Wyoming. Based on the analyses in the EA, the DOE has determined that the proposed action does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.). Therefore, the preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required.

none,

1987-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

237

Finding of No Significant Impact Improvements at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Newsport News, Virginia  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

IMPROVEMENTS AT THE THOMAS JEFFERSON NATIONAL ACCELERATOR FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS AT THE THOMAS JEFFERSON NATIONAL ACCELERATOR FACILITY NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA AGENCY: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ACTION: FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has completed an Environmental Assessment (DOE/EA-1384) for proposed Improvements at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (Jefferson Lab). Newport News, Virginia. Based on the results of the impacts analysis reported in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the context of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). Therefore, preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not necessary, and DOE is issuing this Finding of No

238

III. Finding of No Significant Impact On  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

the basis of the environmental assessment, the NRC concludes that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the NRC has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the proposed action. IV. Further Information Documents related to this action are available electronically at the NRC Library at

unknown authors

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

239

Proposed Rules Federal Register  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

18954 18954 Vol. 76, No. 66 Wednesday, April 6, 2011 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 5 CFR Chapters XXIII and XXIV 10 CFR Chapters II, III, and X 18 CFR Chapter I 41 CFR Chapter 109 48 CFR Chapter 9 Reducing Regulatory Burden; Retrospective Review Under E.O. 13563 AGENCY: Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy. ACTION: Request for information; extension of public comment period. SUMMARY: On February 3, 2011, the Department of Energy (DOE) published a request for information (RFI) issued as part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ''Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review.'' This document announces that the period for submitting reply comments is extended to April 15, 2011. The February 3 document incorrectly published in the Notices section of the Federal Register.

240

DOE/EA-0826: Revised Finding of No Significant Impact for the Natural Resource Management Activities at the Savannah River Site (04/22/05)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact for the Natural Resource Management Activities at the Savannah River Site Agency: U.S. Department of Energy Action: Revised Finding of No Significant Impact Summary: The Department of Energy (DOE) Savannah River Operations Office (SR) prepared an environmental assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-0826) in 1993 to analyze the potential environmental impacts of continued management of natural resources at the Savannah River Site (SRS) located near Aiken, South Carolina. Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE-SR determined that the proposed action was not a major Federal action significantly affecting the human environment within the meaning of NEPA, and for that reason issued a finding of no significant impact (FONSI) dated July 15, 1993. The proposed action in that EA was based upon

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Mitigation Action Plan  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Mitigation Action Plan (MAP) focuses on mitigation commitments stated in the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) and the Record of Decision (ROD) for the Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 1 (NPR-1). Specific commitments and mitigation implementation actions are listed in Appendix A-Mitigation Actions, and form the central focus of this MAP. They will be updated as needed to allow for organizational, regulatory, or policy changes. It is the intent of DOE to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental, safety, and health laws and regulations. Eighty-six specific commitments were identified in the SEIS and associated ROD which pertain to continued operation of NPR-1 with petroleum production at the Maximum Efficient Rate (MER). The mitigation measures proposed are expected to reduce impacts as much as feasible, however, as experience is gained in actual implementation of these measures, some changes may be warranted.

Not Available

1994-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

242

Federal Energy Management Program: Institutional Change for Sustainability  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Sustainability Sustainability Graphic showing 5 gears. They progress from Determine Goal to Identify Context-Rules, Roles and Tools to Develop Action Plan to Implement Plan to Measure and Evaluate. Institutional Change Continuous Improvement Cycle The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) aims to help Federal agencies make sustainability a natural part of how they operate-while continuing to meet their mission goals. Through its Institutional Change activities, FEMP provides guidance and reference materials to help agencies and the myriad organizations within agencies shift their behavior in an effort to save energy and resources now and in the long-term. Institutional change integrates behavior with technologies and policies, recognizing that all three need to align to create make a significant and lasting difference.

243

Federal Energy Management Program: Better Buildings Federal Award  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Better Buildings Federal Award on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Better Buildings Federal...

244

Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands (216(h)) Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands (216(h)) On October 23, 2009, the...

245

Fiscal Year 2008 Annual Federal Performance Report On Executive Agency  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fiscal Year 2008 Annual Federal Performance Report On Executive Fiscal Year 2008 Annual Federal Performance Report On Executive Agency Actions To Assist Historically Black Colleges And Universities Fiscal Year 2008 Annual Federal Performance Report On Executive Agency Actions To Assist Historically Black Colleges And Universities Packet of information to the Secretary of Education Fiscal Year 2008 Annual Federal Performance Report On Executive Agency Actions To Assist Historically Black Colleges And Universities More Documents & Publications Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs): Bridging the Gap between Federal Agencies and MSIs Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) -Historically Black Colleges and Universities 12 Annual Small Business Conference & Expo Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs)-Bridging the Gap Between Federal Agencies and MSIs

246

EA-1339: Finding of No Significant Impact (Amended) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact (Amended) Finding of No Significant Impact (Amended) EA-1339: Finding of No Significant Impact (Amended) Waste Disposition Activities at Paducah Site, Paducah, Kentucky The U.S. Department of Energy has completed an environmental assessment addendum (DOE/EA-1339-A), which is incorporated herein by reference, for proposed disposition of 17,600 m3 of waste from the Paducah Site in Paducah, Kentucky. It is anticipated that most of the waste would be transported for disposal at various locations in the United States. Based on the results of the impact analysis reported in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the context of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). Therefore,

247

EA-1890: DOE Notice of Availability of the Finding of No Significant Impact  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1890: DOE Notice of Availability of the Finding of No Significant Impact Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. (OPT), Reedsport PB150 Deployment and Ocean Test Project, Oregon Territorial Sea, off Reedsport, Oregon DOE's Golden Field Office has determined that providing Federal financial assistance to support the deployment and testing for one of OPT's single, full-scale 150kW PB150 PowerBuoys off the coast of Reedsport, Oregon, would not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Therefore the preparation of an environmental impact statement is not required and DOE hereby Adopts FERC's Environmental Assessment for Hydropower License (FERC Project No. 12713-002) for the

248

EA-1890: DOE Notice of Availability of the Finding of No Significant Impact  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

890: DOE Notice of Availability of the Finding of No 890: DOE Notice of Availability of the Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1890: DOE Notice of Availability of the Finding of No Significant Impact Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. (OPT), Reedsport PB150 Deployment and Ocean Test Project, Oregon Territorial Sea, off Reedsport, Oregon DOE's Golden Field Office has determined that providing Federal financial assistance to support the deployment and testing for one of OPT's single, full-scale 150kW PB150 PowerBuoys off the coast of Reedsport, Oregon, would not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Therefore the preparation of an environmental impact statement is not required and DOE hereby Adopts FERC's Environmental

249

EA-1855: Mitigation Action Plan | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Action Plan (MAP) is part of the Finding of No Significant Impact for the Creston-Bell Transmission Line Rebuild Project (Proposed Action). The Proposed Action involves...

250

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Basics Federal Requirements By Regulation

251

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on AddThis.com... Energy-Efficient Products Technology Deployment Renewable Energy Federal Requirements Renewable Resources & Technologies

252

Memorandum for Heads of Federal Departments and Agencies: Emergencies and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Heads of Federal Departments and Agencies: Heads of Federal Departments and Agencies: Emergencies and NEPA Memorandum for Heads of Federal Departments and Agencies: Emergencies and NEPA With this Memorandum, the Council on Environmental Quality reiterates its previous guidance on the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environmental review of proposed emergency response actions.This memorandum clarifies that the previous guidance remains applicable to current situations and provides guidance on required agency environmental review. Emergencies and NEPA More Documents & Publications Memorandum for Federal NEPA Contacts: Emergency Actions and NEPA Aligning National Environmental Policy Act Process with Environmental Management Systems Final Guidance on Improving the Process for Preparing Efficient and Timely

253

Energy Action Month | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Services » Outreach » Energy Action Month Services » Outreach » Energy Action Month Energy Action Month October 7, 2013 - 4:43pm Addthis The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) supports Energy Action Month by offering materials that promote energy- and water-saving practices in Federal facilities. This year's outreach materials call on Federal employees to take action and empower leadership, innovation, and excellence to realize a secure energy future. Empower Leadership One individual can empower collaboration and teamwork that can spark change and result in sustainable solutions. Empower coworkers, groups, and entire organizations to lead by example, build momentum, and make a difference. Empower Innovation Innovative thinking can guide strategic sustainability plans, generate new best practices, and accelerate the deployment of clean energy technologies.

254

Report of the Federal Internetworking Requirements Panel  

SciTech Connect

The Federal Internetworking Requirements Panel (FIRP) was established by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to reassess Federal requirements for open systems networks and to recommend policy on the Government`s use of networking standards. The Panel was chartered to recommend actions which the Federal Government can take to address the short and long-term issues of interworking and convergence of networking protocols--particularly the Internet Protocol Suite (IPS) and Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) protocol suite and, when appropriate, proprietary protocols. The Panel was created at the request of the Office of Management and Budget in collaboration with the Federal Networking Council and the Federal Information Resources Management Policy Council. The Panel`s membership and charter are contained in an appendix to this report.

1994-05-31T23:59:59.000Z

255

Federal Information Processing Standards  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Federal Information Processing Standards Publications (FIPS PUBS). ... Replacement Standards for Withdrawn FIPS on Geographic Codes.

2013-07-30T23:59:59.000Z

256

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Facility Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on AddThis.com... Requirements by Subject

257

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products September 2011 Update to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products September 2011 Update on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products September 2011 Update on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products September 2011 Update on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products September 2011 Update on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products September 2011 Update on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal

258

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products November 2011 Update to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products November 2011 Update on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products November 2011 Update on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products November 2011 Update on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products November 2011 Update on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products November 2011 Update on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal

259

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products February 2012 Update to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products February 2012 Update on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products February 2012 Update on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products February 2012 Update on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products February 2012 Update on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products February 2012 Update on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal

260

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Operations & Maintenance Greenhouse Gases Water Efficiency Basics

262

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Utility Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partners on AddThis.com...

263

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CONVEYANCE OF PARCEL ED-6  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CONVEYANCE OF PARCEL ED-6 TO THE CITY OF OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact SUMMARY: The U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) has completed an Environmental Assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-1514) for the proposed conveyance of Parcel ED-6 to the city of Oak Ridge. The need for DOE action is the result of a request from the city of Oak Ridge to convey Parcel ED-6 under 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 770. The proposed action would also help the city to meet the goals stated in the Oak Ridge City Council's Strategic Plan, The Path Forward: 2003-2007, which identifies the development of new housing as a major initiative. DOE also recognizes that transferring land for local

264

Federal Interagency Chemistry Representatives (FICR) ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Federal Interagency Chemistry Representatives (FICR) Meeting 2013 - A Federal Green Chemistry Forum. ...

2013-05-31T23:59:59.000Z

265

Federal Financial Report  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

FEDERAL FINANCIAL REPORT FEDERAL FINANCIAL REPORT (Follow form instructions) 1. Federal Agency and Organizational Element 2. Federal Grant or Other Identifying Number Assigned by Federal Agency Page of to Which Report is Submitted (To report multiple grants, use FFR Attachment) 1 pages 3. Recipient Organization (Name and complete address including Zip code) 4a. DUNS Number 4b. EIN 5. Recipient Account Number or Identifying Number 6. Report Type 7. Basis of Accounting

266

June 2006 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Page 1 June 2006 Page 1 June 2006 Technical Standards Program Manager's Note 1 Safety for Electrical Workers 2 Significant Federal Laws and Policies 3 Clearance of Solid Materials from Nuclear Facilities 5 Technical Standards Manager Spotlight 6 Topical Committee Developments 7 From the ANSI Web site 8 Don't Get "Board" With

267

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy Efficiency...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

efficient electric water heaters available, saving 50% to 60% over standard products. ENERGY STAR Qualified Products FEMP provides acquisition guidance and Federal efficiency...

268

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Technology Deployment...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

& Initiatives Solid State Lighting Working Group Distributed Energy ResourcesCombined Heat & Power Resources Renewable Energy Federal Technology Deployment Working Group Energy...

269

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Fleet Reporting  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

legislation requires agencies to annually report information on Federal motor vehicle usage and the makeup of their motor vehicle fleets. Agencies must also report the use of...

270

The U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

submitted to Congress a required "Implementation Proposal for The National Action Plan on Demand Response." The U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory...

271

Monticello Mill site Federal Facility Agreement, December 22, 1988 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Monticello Monticello Agreement Name Monticello (Utah) Site: Monticello Vicinity Properties NPL Site and Monticello Millsite Federal Facility Agreement Pursuant to CERCLA Section 120, December 22, 1988 State Utah Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, implementing, and monitoring appropriate response actions at the Site Parties DOE; US EPA; State of Utah Department of Environmental Health Date 12/22/1988 SCOPE * Identify Interim Remedial Action (IRA) alternatives, if any, which are appropriate at the Site prior to the implementation of final remedial actions for the Site. * Evaluate all past investigative and response actions taken at the Site and documented

272

PRESERVATION OF FEDERAL RECORDS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PRESERVATION OF FEDERAL RECORDS PRESERVATION OF FEDERAL RECORDS The Federal Records Act requires the Department of Energy (DOE) Records Officer to remind departing Federal and contractor employees that Federal records may not be removed from Government custody nor may they be destroyed except in accordance with a records disposition schedule that has been approved by the Archivist of the United States. The creation of adequate documentation and the preservation of Federal records are required by law and regulation (contained in 36 CFR Chapter XII). As Federal and contractor employees, you have Federal record-keeping responsibilities that are regulated by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) to ensure the retention and preservation of Federal records. PURPOSE The purpose of this brochure is to provide records exit procedures for

273

Integrating State and Federal Environmental Reviews  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA and CEQA: Integrating State and Federal Environmental Reviews Draft for Public Review and Comment March 2013 2 Table of Contents: I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 II. Questions and Answers .................................................................................................................... 5 A. Stage 1: Preliminary Questions ................................................................................................. 5 1. How Does NEPA and CEQA Terminology Differ? .................................................... 5 a. "Action" (NEPA) versus "Project" (CEQA) ................................................ 5

274

Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 342: Area 23 Mercury Fire Training Pit, Nevada Test Site, Nevada  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Decision Document has been prepared for the Nevada Test Site's Area 23 Mercury Fire Training Pit (Corrective Action Unit 342) in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO, 1996). Corrective Action Unit 342 is comprised of Corrective Action Site 23-56-01. The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document is to identify and provide a rationale for the selection of a recommended corrective action alternative for Corrective Action Unit 342. The scope of this document consists of the following: Develop corrective action objectives; Identify corrective action alternative screening criteria; Develop corrective action alternatives; Perform detailed and comparative evaluations of corrective action alternatives in relation to corrective action objectives and screening criteria; and Recommend and justify a preferred corrective action alternative for the Corrective Action Unit.

DOE/NV

1999-05-26T23:59:59.000Z

275

Federal Acquisition Regulation; Federal Acquisition Circular  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005-40 Federal Register /Vol. 75, No. 55 /Tuesday, March 23, 2010 /page 14059 A summary for the FAR rule follows. Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) (FAR case 2008-027) Effective Date: April 22, 2010. This final rule amends the FAR to implement section 872 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009. Section 872 requires the establishment of a data system, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), containing specific information on the integrity and performance of covered Federal agency contractors and grantees. FAPIIS is available for use in award decisions at www.ppirs.gov. Government input to FAPIIS is accomplished at www.cpars.csd.disa.mil.

276

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Greenhouse Gas Inventories and  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Inventories and Performance to someone by E-mail Inventories and Performance to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Greenhouse Gas Inventories and Performance on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Greenhouse Gas Inventories and Performance on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Greenhouse Gas Inventories and Performance on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Greenhouse Gas Inventories and Performance on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Greenhouse Gas Inventories and Performance on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Greenhouse Gas Inventories and Performance on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Operations & Maintenance

277

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Industry Commitment to someone by E-mail Industry Commitment to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Industry Commitment on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Industry Commitment on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Industry Commitment on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Industry Commitment on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Industry Commitment on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Industry Commitment on AddThis.com... Energy Savings Performance Contracts

278

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy Efficiency Acquisition  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Energy Federal Energy Efficiency Acquisition Guidance and Requirements for Residential Heat Pump Water Heaters to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy Efficiency Acquisition Guidance and Requirements for Residential Heat Pump Water Heaters on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy Efficiency Acquisition Guidance and Requirements for Residential Heat Pump Water Heaters on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy Efficiency Acquisition Guidance and Requirements for Residential Heat Pump Water Heaters on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy Efficiency Acquisition Guidance and Requirements for Residential Heat Pump Water Heaters on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy Efficiency

279

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Participants to someone by E-mail Participants to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Participants on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Participants on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Participants on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Participants on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Participants on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Participants on AddThis.com... Energy Savings Performance Contracts ENABLE Utility Energy Service Contracts

280

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Water Efficiency Best...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Water Efficiency Best Management Practices to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Water Efficiency Best Management Practices on Facebook...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Federal Energy Management Program: Guiding Principles for Federal...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Guiding Principles for Federal Leadership in High-Performance and Sustainable Buildings to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Guiding Principles for Federal...

282

Federal Energy Management Program: 2011 Federal Energy and Water...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2011 Federal Energy and Water Management Award Winners to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: 2011 Federal Energy and Water Management Award Winners on...

283

Tucannon River Spring Chinook Captive Broodstock Program Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact  

SciTech Connect

Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) is proposing to fund the Tucannon River Spring Chinook Captive Broodstock Program, a small-scale production initiative designed to increase numbers of a weak but potentially recoverable population of spring chinook salmon in the Tucannon River in the State of Washington. BPA has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-l326) evaluating the proposed project. Based on the analysis in the EA, BPA has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. Therefore, the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required, and BPA is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI).

N /A

2000-05-24T23:59:59.000Z

284

Mid-Columbia Coho Reintroduction Feasibility Project : Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) is proposing to fund research for 2 to 3 years on the feasibility of reintroducing coho salmon into mid-Columbia River basin tributaries. The research would take place in the Methow and Wenatchee river basins in Chelan and Okanogan Counties, Washington. BPA has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-1282) evaluating the proposed project. Based on the analysis in the EA, BPA has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. Therefore, the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required, and BPA is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration; Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation; Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife

1999-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

285

2010 Northwest Federal Market Assessment Report  

SciTech Connect

The primary intent of this market assessment is to provide insights on the effectiveness of current energy efficiency and renewable energy program offerings available to Federal sites in the region. The level of detail, quality and currency of the data used in this market assessment varies significantly by Federal agency and energy efficiency service provider. Limited access to some Federal sites, limited availability of key points of contact, time/resource constraints, and other considerations limited the total number of Federal agencies and energy efficiency service providers participating in the survey.

Scanlon, Tim; Sandusky, William F.

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

286

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 500: Test Cell A Septic System, Nevada Test Site, Nevada  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) has been developed in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) that was agreed to by the US Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office (DOE/NV); the State of Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP); and the US Department of Defense (FFACO, 1996). The CAIP is a document that provides or references all of the specific information for investigation activities associated with Corrective Action Units (CAUs) or Corrective Action Sites (CASs). According to the FFACO (1996), CASs are sites potentially requiring corrective action(s), and may include solid waste management units, individual disposal sites, or release sites. Corrective Action Units consist of one or more CASs grouped together based on geography, technical similarity, or agency responsibility for the purpose of determining corrective actions. This CAIP will be used in conjunction with the Work Plan for Leachfield Corrective Action Units: Nevada Test Site and Tonopah Test Range, Nevada (DOE/NV, 1998c), hereafter referred to as the Leachfield Work Plan. Under the FFACO, a work plan is an optional planning document that provides information for a CAU or group of CAUs where significant commonality exists. This CAIP contains CAU-specific information including a facility description, environmental sample collection objectives, and the criteria for conducting site investigation activities at CAU 500. This CAIP addresses one of three leachfield systems associated with Test Cell A, which is located in Area 25 at the Nevada Test Site (NTS). The NTS is approximately 105 kilometers (km) (65 miles [mi]) northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada (see Leachfield Work Plan Figure 1-1). Corrective Action Unit 500 is comprised of the Test Cell A Septic System (CAS 25-04-05) and the associated leachfield system presented in Figure 1-1 (FFACO, 1996).

IT Las Vegas

1999-01-27T23:59:59.000Z

287

Action Items  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ACTION ITEMS ACTION ITEMS Presentation to the DOE High Level Waste Corporate Board July 29, 2009 Kurt Gerdes Office of Waste Processing DOE-EM Office of Engineering & Technology 2 ACTION ITEMS Action Item Status * Approve Performance Assessment Community of Practice Charter * Charter approved 13 July 2009 by majority vote of Board (balloting conducted by e- mail). * Report on first Performance Assessment Community of Practice meeting * Meeting held on 13-14 July 2009. Report by David Kosson, PhD, Vanderbilt University and CRESP * Update of Tank Waste Corporate Board Charter to include changes resulting from changes in Office of Environmental Management * In progress (pending completion of any reorganization) * Update of Performance Assessment Community of Practice Charter to include

288

Federal Agency NEPA Procedures  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Each Federal agency is required to develop NEPA procedures that supplement the CEQ Regulations. Developed in consultation with CEQ, Federal agency NEPA procedures must meet the standards in the CEQ...

289

Federal Reserve System. Filename  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

* Any views expressed represent those of the author only and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve

Til Schuermann; Fannie Mae; Freddie Mac; Wells Fargo; Morgan Stanley; Deutsche Bank

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

290

Federal Employee Training  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the Chief Human Capital Officer the Chief Human Capital Officer Office of Learning and Workforce Development July 26, 2011 Federal Employee Training Desk Reference Federal Employee Training Federal Employee Training Page 2 of 53 July 26, 2011 Desk Reference Contents CHAPTER I. TRAINING REQUESTs, APPROVALs, AUTHORIZATIONS AND ALLOWABLE COSTs ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 1. TRAINING REQUESTS. ................................................................................................................. 3 2. TRAINING APPROVALS. .............................................................................................................. 3

291

Federal Energy Management Program: Outreach  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Outreach to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Outreach on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Outreach on Twitter Bookmark Federal...

292

Finding of No Significant Impact for the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Compliance Alternatives at the Savannah River Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Compliance Alternatives at the Savannah River Site Agency: U.S. Department of Energy Action: Finding of No Significant Impact Summary: The Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-1563) to analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed and alternative actions to protect the quality of State waters at 38 stormwater outfalls located at the Savannah River Site (SRS). The draft EA was made available to the States of South Carolina and Georgia, and to the public, for a 30-day comment period. Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within

293

EA-1625: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of No Significant Impact EA-1625: Finding of No Significant Impact Southeast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership Phase III Early Test The proposed action is for the DOE...

294

EA-1875: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

No Significant Impact EA-1875: Finding of No Significant Impact The Jackson Laboratory Biomass Energy Center Project, Bar Harbor, Maine DOE's proposed action is to authorize the...

295

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Energy and Federal Energy and Water Management Awards to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management Awards on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management Awards on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management Awards on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management Awards on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management Awards on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Energy and Water Management Awards on AddThis.com... Project Assistance Training Outreach Awards for Saving Energy Federal Energy and Water Management Better Buildings Federal Award

296

EA-1858: DOE Notice of Availability and Notice of Floodplain Action |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8: DOE Notice of Availability and Notice of Floodplain Action 8: DOE Notice of Availability and Notice of Floodplain Action EA-1858: DOE Notice of Availability and Notice of Floodplain Action Nippon Paper Industries USA Company Biomass Cogeneration Project, Port Angeles, Washington The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is proposing to provide American Reinvestment and Recovery Act federal funding to the Washington Department of Commerce under the State Energy Program to Nippon Paper Industries USA Company to construct and operate a new biomass-fueled cogeneration facility in Port Angeles, Washington. Notice of Availability and Notice of Floodplain Action: Nippon Paper Industries USA Company Biomass Cogeneration Project, Port Angeles, Washington DOE/EA 1858 More Documents & Publications EA-1858: Finding of No Significant Impact

297

Revised Finding of No Significant Impact for Safeguards and Security Upgrades for Storage of Plutonium Materials at the Savannah River Site (DOE/EA-1538)(03/11/08)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact for Safeguards and Security Upgrades for Storage of Plutonium Materials at the Savannah River Site Agency: U.S. Department of Energy Action: Revised Finding of No Significant Impact Summary: The Department of Energy (DOE) prepared an environmental assessment (EA) (DOEEA-1538) in 2005 to evaluate the potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of proposed and alternative actions to enhance the safe and secure storage of plutonium-bearing materials at the Savannah River Site (SRS) to meet the enhanced terrorist threat that has existed since the events of September 11, 2001. Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE determined that the proposed action was not a major Federal action significantly affecting

298

Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) 2003 Annual Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Technical Capability Program FY 2003 Annual Plan Washington, D.C. 20585 September 2002 FTCP FY 2003 Annual Action Plan INTRODUCTION The U.S. Department of Energy's Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) provides management direction to assist the Federal workforce in maintaining necessary technical competencies to safely operate its defense nuclear facilities. The Federal Technical Capability Panel (Panel) consists of senior technical safety managers representing nuclear facilities, and reports to the Deputy Secretary for workforce safety technical capabilities' matters. The Panel will continue to pursue progress in the following areas: 1. Continued development of senior management commitment and support for the technical intern

299

60-DAY Federal Register Notice - Proposed  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

60-DAY Federal Register Notice - Proposed 60-DAY Federal Register Notice - Proposed [6450-01-P] DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Proposed Agency Information Collection AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy ACTION: Notice and Request for Comments SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) invites public comment on a proposed collection of information that DOE is developing for submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Comments are invited on: (a) whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the

300

Action Codes Table | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Action Codes Table | National Nuclear Security Administration Action Codes Table | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Action Codes Table Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nuclear Security > Nuclear Materials Management & Safeguards System > NMMSS Information, Reports & Forms > Code Tables > Action Codes Table

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Part 3: Removal Action | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3: Removal Action 3: Removal Action Part 3: Removal Action Question: When may removal actions be initiated? Answer: Removal actions may be initiated when DOE determines that the action will prevent, minimize, stabilize, or eliminate a risk to health or the environment. The NCP specifies that the determination that a risk to health or the environment is appropriate for removal action should be based on: actual or potential exposure of humans, animals, or the food chain the presence of contained hazardous substances that pose a threat of release the threat of migration of the hazardous substances the threat of fire or explosion the availability of an appropriate Federal or State response capability [section 300.415(b)(2)]. In essence, where DOE identifies a threat of exposure to or migration of

302

Non-Federal Participation In Ac Intertie Final Environmental Impact Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Non-Federal Participation In Ac Intertie Non-Federal Participation In Ac Intertie Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1: Environmental Analysis Bonneville DOE/eis-0145 POWER ADMINISTRATION January 1994 Non-Federal Participation in AC Intertie Final Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS - 0145) Responsible Agency: U.S. Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Title of Proposed Action: Non-Federal Participation in AC Intertie States and Other Areas Involved: Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana, California, Nevada, Utah, New Mexico, Arizona, Wyoming, British Columbia Abstract: BPA is considering action in two areas: (1) non-Federal access to

303

Microsoft Word - Final Mitigated Action Plan - CNMI.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

| P | P a g e MITIGATION ACTION PLAN FOR THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE GREEN ENERGY SCHOOL WIND PROJECT SAIPAN, COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS U.S. Department of Energy Golden Service Center Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy DOE/EA-1923 2 | P a g e ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AMC Adaptive Management Committee CFR Code of Federal Regulations DOE U.S. Department of Energy EA environmental assessment ESA Endangered Species Act FONSI finding of no significant impacts MAP mitigation action plan NEPA National Environmental Policy Act USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 3 | P a g e 1.0 Introduction The United States Department of Energy (DOE) has issued a Final Environmental Assessment (EA) and a

304

EA-1792-S1: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-S1: Finding of No Significant Impact 2-S1: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1792-S1: Finding of No Significant Impact The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has completed a Supplemental Environmental Assessment (Supplemental EA)(DOE/EA-1792-S1) for the University of Maine's (UMaine) Deepwater Offshore Floating Wind Turbine Testing and Demonstration Project - Castine. Based on the analysis in the Supplemental EA, DOE has determined that the decision to authorize the expenditure of Congressionally directed federal funding by UMaine to proceed with the deployment, testing, and retrieval of one small-scale floating turbine at the Castine site, analyzed under DOE's Proposed Action and UMaine's proposed project, will not significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaining of the National

305

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products March 2013 Update to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products March 2013 Update on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products March 2013 Update on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products March 2013 Update on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products March 2013 Update on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products March 2013 Update on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products March 2013 Update on

306

Billy Shaw Dam and Reservoir : Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impacts.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This notice announces BPA`s decision to fund the construction, operation, and maintenance of the Billy Shaw Dam and Reservoir on the Duck Valley Reservation. This project is part of a continuing effort to address system-wide fish and wildlife losses caused by the development of the hydropower system in the Columbia River Basin. BPA has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) evaluating the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project. Based on the analysis in the EA, BPA has determined that the Proposed Action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. Therefore, the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required and BPA is issuing this FONSI.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration; Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation, Nevada.

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

307

WIPP Documents - Federal Regulations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Regulations 40 CFR Part 191 Environmental radiation protection standards for management and disposal of spent nuclear fuel, high-level and transuranic radioactive wastes....

308

From Federal Computer Week:  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Federal Computer Week: Energy agency launches performance-based pay system By Richard W. Walker Published on March 27, 2008 The Energy Department's National Nuclear Security...

309

Federal NEPA Contacts  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

CEQ and most Federal agencies identify primary points of contact for NEPA compliance. Normally a senior environmental professional, environmental law attorney, or member of agency leadership, these...

310

Increasing Federal Office Building Water Efficiency, Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) (Fact Sheet)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

requires a two percent annual reduction in water use (compared to requires a two percent annual reduction in water use (compared to a FY 2007 baseline), significantly reducing total Federal water consumption by FY 2020. View Federal water requirements at www.femp.energy.gov/program/waterefficiency_ requirements.html. Increasing Federal Office Building Water Efficiency With less than one percent of Earth's water available for human use, the Federal Government is leading by example with water efficiency and conservation efforts. Federal laws and regulations require agencies to implement water efficiency efforts and reduce water consumption, making water an integral part of every comprehensive resource management program. Water Management Planning A comprehensive water management plan includes clear information on how a Federal facility uses water from

311

Non-Federal Participation Federal Marketing and Joint Ventures : Administrator`s Record of Decision.  

SciTech Connect

By this Record of Decision, the Bonneville Power Administrtion (BPA) adopts the Federal Marketing and Joint Ventures alternative to guide future BPA contract negotiations involving use of the Pacific Northwest-Pacific Southwest AC Intertie (Intertie). To implement this concept, BPa intends to negotiate an array of flexible, market-oriented contracts, expanded Intertie access for non-BPA parties, efficient use of Federal Columbia River resources, and facilitation of efficient, coordinated west coast development of generating resources. Federal Marketing and Joint Ventures meets need and serves purposes to a better degree than No Action. BPA considers Federal Marketing and Joint Ventures to be the environmentally preferable alternative in that it encourages long-term coordination of west coast generating resource development and operation. This provides the greatest opportunity to decrease generation of more environmentally harmful plants which would otherwise have greater effects on air, land, and water, and to avoid construction of new generation plants.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1994-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

312

Federal Stewardship | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Federal Stewardship Federal Stewardship Ames Site Office (AMSO) AMSO Home About Organization Chart .pdf file (113KB) Federal Stewardship Internal Site Office Operations Jobs Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Ames Site Office U.S. Department of Energy 9800 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 P: (630) 252-6167 F: (630) 252-2855 About Federal Stewardship Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Federal Stewardship maintains and protects Federal assets at the Ames Laboratory or assigned to the Ames Site Office. Objectives Reviews and assesses Ames Laboratory and support activities and stewardship needs against the contract requirements and takes action, as necessary. Develops and maintains an effective working relationship and communication

313

Presidential Memorandum on Federal Leadership on Energy Management |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Presidential Memorandum on Federal Leadership on Energy Management Presidential Memorandum on Federal Leadership on Energy Management Presidential Memorandum on Federal Leadership on Energy Management December 5, 2013 - 2:52pm Addthis In the latest step under his Climate Action Plan, President Obama today signed a Memorandum directing the Federal Government to consume 20 percent of its electricity from renewable sources by 2020 - more than double the current level. Meeting this renewable energy goal will reduce pollution in our communities, promote American energy independence, and support homegrown energy produced by American workers. In 2009, the President directed the Federal Government to become a leader in clean energy and energy efficiency when he signed Executive Order 13514 on Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance,

314

Finding of No Significant Impacts  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE/EA 1916 DOE/EA 1916 Finding of No Significant Impacts Page 2 of 6 system; and (6) appurtenant facilities for navigation safety and operation. The project is estimated to have an annual generation of 1.25 gigawatt-hours (GWh) after the completion of Phase 2. Because the project would be connected to the existing electrical grid, on September 1, 2011, ORPC Maine applied to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for an 8-year pilot project license to construct, operate, and maintain the proposed Cobscook Bay project (FERC Project No. 12711), This application required FERC to conduct a review of the potential environmental impacts of the project in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Since DOE was considering providing financial assistance for the project, DOE

315

30-Day Federal Register Notice - Proposed  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

30-Day Federal Register Notice - Proposed 30-Day Federal Register Notice - Proposed [6450-01-P] DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Proposed Agency Information Collection AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice and Request for OMB Review and Comment SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance, a proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed collection will {enter a brief description of the collection that highlights the major questions being asked; suggested length is 2 to 5 sentences}. DATES: Comments regarding this collection must be received on or before [INSERT DATE 30 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find it difficult

316

30-Day Federal Register Notice - Proposed  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

30-Day Federal Register Notice - Proposed 30-Day Federal Register Notice - Proposed [6450-01-P] DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Proposed Agency Information Collection AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice and Request for OMB Review and Comment SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance, a proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed collection will {enter a brief description of the collection that highlights the major questions being asked; suggested length is 2 to 5 sentences}. DATES: Comments regarding this collection must be received on or before [INSERT DATE 30 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find it difficult

317

Promoting greater Federal energy productivity [Final report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document is a close-out report describing the work done under this DOE grant to improve Federal Energy Productivity. Over the four years covered in this document, the Alliance To Save Energy conducted liaison with the private sector through our Federal Energy Productivity Task Force. In this time, the Alliance held several successful workshops on the uses of metering in Federal facilities and other meetings. We also conducted significant research on energy efficiency, financing, facilitated studies of potential energy savings in energy intensive agencies, and undertook other tasks outlined in this report.

Hopkins, Mark; Dudich, Luther

2003-03-05T23:59:59.000Z

318

U.S. Department of Energy Finding of No Significant Impact  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact Reconstruction of the South Access Road (CR 802) in Support of the Department of Energy, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in Eddy County, New Mexico AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Carlsbad Field Office, has adopted an Environmental Assessment (EA) prepared by the U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Carlsbad Field Office for the reconstruction of the South Access Road for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) near Carlsbad, New Mexico. DOE currently operates WIPP as a disposal site for transuranic (TRU) waste and TRU-mixed waste containing hazardous chemical constituents generated by the nuclear defense activities of the federal government.

319

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

August 2012 Update to someone by August 2012 Update to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products August 2012 Update on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products August 2012 Update on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products August 2012 Update on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products August 2012 Update on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products August 2012 Update on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products August 2012 Update on

320

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

April 2012 Update to someone by April 2012 Update to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products April 2012 Update on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products April 2012 Update on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products April 2012 Update on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products April 2012 Update on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products April 2012 Update on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products April 2012 Update on

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

An overview of the federal energy management toolkit  

SciTech Connect

The federal government is the single largest energy user in the US. The annual cost to the American taxpayer for supplying energy to buildings, facilities, and operations within the federal sector is $5 billion. Several estimates have been produced projecting that up to 40% of this annual cost could be saved through energy efficient actions. Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) and other DOE laboratories provide technical assistance to the Department of Energy (DOE) Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) and other federal agencies to identify, evaluate, and prioritize the most cost-effective actions to improve energy efficiency and reduce energy costs at federal installations. A key feature of this program is the development and application of a comprehensive set of software tools, analyses, procedures, operations and maintenance approaches, and the transfer of knowledge through technical assistance and demonstration activities. PNL and other federal laboratories are cooperating with FEMP and other federal agencies in applying these tools at over 50 federal sites containing over 60 central utility systems and more than 50,000 buildings and facilities. The overall approach employed by FEMP is fuel- and technology-neutral. This means that by applying the FEMP approach, the least-cost way to provide heat, cooling, and other energy services is identified without regard to whether or not the energy source is electricity, natural gas, or other fuel forms.

Currie, J.W.; Parker, G. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States); DeVine, K.D. [Dept. of Energy, Washington, DC (United States)

1993-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

322

Finding of No Significant Impact for the Environmental Assessment for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve West Hackberry Facility Raw Water Intake Pipeline Replacement Cameron and Calcasieu Parishes, Louisiana  

SciTech Connect

DOE has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA), DOE/EA-1497, for the proposed replacement of the existing 107 centimeter (cm) [42 inch (in)] 6.87 kilometer (km) [4.27 mile (mi)] raw water intake pipeline (RWIPL). This action is necessary to allow for continued, optimum operations at the West Hackberry facility (main site/facility). The EA described the proposed action (including action alternatives) and three alternatives to the proposed action. The EA evaluated only the potential environmental consequences of the proposed action (one action alternative), and Alternative 3, which consisted of the No Build Action that is required by 10 CFR 1021.321(c). Based on the analysis in DOE/EA-1497, DOE has determined that the proposed action does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting humans or the natural environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 USC 4321 et seq. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required, and DOE is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). To further minimize impacts to environmental media, the DOE will also implement a Mitigation Action Plan (MAP) for this action. The MAP is included as Appendix F of this EA, which is appended to this FONSI. The Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA), as amended, authorizes the creation of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) to store crude oil to reduce the United States' vulnerability to energy supply disruptions. Crude oil is stored in geologic formations, or salt domes, located under these facilities. The purpose of this proposed project is to construct a new RWIPL at the main site to replace the existing RWIPL which services this facility.

2004-08-31T23:59:59.000Z

323

Finding of No Significant Impact for the Environmental Assessment for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve West Hackberry Facility Raw Water Intake Pipeline Replacement Cameron and Calcasieu Parishes, Louisiana  

SciTech Connect

DOE has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA), DOE/EA-1497, for the proposed replacement of the existing 107 centimeter (cm) [42 inch (in)] 6.87 kilometer (km) [4.27 mile (mi)] raw water intake pipeline (RWIPL). This action is necessary to allow for continued, optimum operations at the West Hackberry facility (main site/facility). The EA described the proposed action (including action alternatives) and three alternatives to the proposed action. The EA evaluated only the potential environmental consequences of the proposed action (one action alternative), and Alternative 3, which consisted of the No Build Action that is required by 10 CFR 1021.321(c). Based on the analysis in DOE/EA-1497, DOE has determined that the proposed action does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting humans or the natural environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 USC 4321 et seq. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required, and DOE is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). To further minimize impacts to environmental media, the DOE will also implement a Mitigation Action Plan (MAP) for this action. The MAP is included as Appendix F of this EA, which is appended to this FONSI. The Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA), as amended, authorizes the creation of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) to store crude oil to reduce the United States' vulnerability to energy supply disruptions. Crude oil is stored in geologic formations, or salt domes, located under these facilities. The purpose of this proposed project is to construct a new RWIPL at the main site to replace the existing RWIPL which services this facility.

N /A

2004-08-31T23:59:59.000Z

324

Analysis of Federal incentives used to stimulate energy production  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Federal incentives for the development of solar energy are examined. A Federal incentive is any action that can be taken by the government to expand residential and commercial use of solar energy. The development of solar energy policy could be enhanced by identification, quantification, and analysis of Federal incentives that have been used to simulate the development of other forms of energy. The text of this report identifies, quantifies, and analyzes such incentives and relates them to current thought about solar energy. Four viewpoints used in this discussion come from 4 types of analysis: economic, political, organizational, and legal. The next chapter identifies actions (primarily domestic) that the Federal government has taken concerning energy. This analysis uses the typology of actions described in the previous chapter to identify actions, and the four viewpoints described there to determine whether an action concerns energy. Once identified, the actions are described and then quantified by an estimate of the 1976 cost of accomplishing them. Then incentives, investments, liabilities, regulations, and other factors are analyzed in detail for nuclear energy, hydroelectric power, coal, petroleum, and natural gas. Incentives of all energy sources are then discussed with respect to solar energy policy. (MCW)

Not Available

1978-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

325

Federal Memorandum of Understanding for Hydropower/Federal Inland  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

source source History View New Pages Recent Changes All Special Pages Semantic Search/Querying Get Involved Help Apps Datasets Community Login | Sign Up Search Page Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon » Federal Memorandum of Understanding for Hydropower/Federal Inland Hydropower Working Group < Federal Memorandum of Understanding for Hydropower Jump to: navigation, search Federal Memorandum of Understanding for Hydropower Hydroelectric-collage2.jpg Home Federal Inland Hydropower Working Group Participating Agencies Resources Federal Inland Hydropower Working Group The Federal Inland Hydropower Working Group is made up of 15 federal entities involved in the regulation, management, or development of hydropower resources (including hydrokinetics) in rivers and streams of the

326

Federal Energy Management Program: Better Buildings Federal Award...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2013 Guidelines for Entering to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Better Buildings Federal Award 2013 Guidelines for Entering on Facebook Tweet about...

327

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainabl...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Sustainable Buildings Federal agencies have to meet laws and regulations, which set energy management and efficiency requirements for Federal buildings, including reducing energy...

328

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

procurement, visit femp.energy.govprocurement. Welcome to the fourth issue of Federal Energy-Efficient Product Procurement This bi-monthly update helps Federal procurement...

329

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

January 2013 Update to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products January 2013 Update on Facebook Tweet about...

330

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Greenhouse Gas Inventories...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

to FY 2008. Read the White House Council on Environmental Quality's Guidance for Federal Greenhouse Gas Accounting and Inventories under E.O. 13515. The Federal Energy Management...

331

DOE/EA-1605: Finding of No Significant Impact for the Environmental Assessment for Biomass Cogeneration and Heating Facilities at the Savannah River Site (August 2008)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Biomass Cogeneration and Heating Facilities at the Savannah River Site Agency: U.S. Department of Energy Action: Finding of No Significant Impact Summary: The Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-1605) to analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed construction and operation of new biomass cogeneration and heating facilities located at the Savannah River Site (SRS). The draft EA was made available to the States of South Carolina and Georgia, and to the public, for a 30-day comment period. Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. Therefore, the

332

Corrective Action Management Program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Corrective Action Management Program (CAMP) Home CAMP Background DOE Directives Corrective Action Management Team Corrective Action Tracking System (CATS) CAMP Quarterly Reports...

333

Federal Energy Capabilities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Energy Capabilities Federal Energy Capabilities Federal Energy Capabilities MCKINSTRY'S CYCLE OF SERVICES PROGRAM SERVICES McKinstry is dedicated to excellence in design, construction, and facilities operation. We strive to develop innovative, cost effective facility solutions for you. Below are the services we can deliver under our energy services program: * Design-Build MEDP contracting * Energy savings performance contracting * Smart Building System integration * Demand response * Smart metering to Smart Grid solutions * Advanced metering services * Renewable energy systems * Cogeneration/combined heat power * Creative tax credit and green tags/white tags * ESCO preventative maintenance APPROACH * No premium for the energy services delivery * Open book pricing and guaranteed

334

Electricity Advisory Committee - Federal Register Notices | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Register Notices Electricity Advisory Committee - Federal Register Notices Electricity Advisory Committee - Federal Register Notices NOTICE OF OPEN ELECTRICITY ADVISORY...

335

FEDERAL ASSISTANCE BUDGET INFORMATION (CONSTRUCTION) | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FEDERAL ASSISTANCE BUDGET INFORMATION (CONSTRUCTION) FEDERAL ASSISTANCE BUDGET INFORMATION (CONSTRUCTION) Form provides information on the federal assistance budget for...

336

Federal Buildings Supplemental Survey 1993  

Reports and Publications (EIA)

The Federal Buildings Supplemental Survey (FBSS) was conducted by EIA in conjunction with DOE's Office of Federal Energy Management Programs (OFEMP) to gain a better understanding of how Federal buildings use energy. This report presents the data from 881 completed telephone interviews with Federal buildings in three Federal regions. These buildings were systematically selected using OFEMP's specifications; therefore, these data do not statistically represent all Federal buildings in the country .

Information Center

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

337

EA-1818: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of No Significant Impact Financial Assistance to Ohio for the Pettisville Local Schools Wind Energy Project, Pettisville, Fulton County, Ohio DOE's proposed action is to...

338

EA-1804: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Impact EA-1804: Finding of No Significant Impact Sauk Valley Community College's Wind Energy Project, Dixon, Lee County, Illinois The Department of Energy's proposed action is...

339

EA-1807: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Impact EA-1807: Finding of No Significant Impact Heartland Community College Wind Energy Project, Normal, McLean County, Illinois The Department of Energy's proposed action...

340

EA-1759: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Impact EA-1759: Finding of No Significant Impact Southwest Alaska Regional Geothermal Energy Project, Naknek, Alaska The Department of Energy is proposing an action to...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

EA-1748: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact 10 CFR 431: Energy Conservation Standards for Small Electric Motors The proposed action is the establishment of new energy conservation...

342

EA-1613: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EA-1613: Finding of No Significant Impact Proposed High Explosive Pressing Facility Pantex Plant, Amarillo, Texas The proposed action is to construct a new facility that...

343

Federal Financial Interventions and Subsidies in Energy Markets 2007  

Reports and Publications (EIA)

This report responds to a request from Senator Lamar Alexander of Tennessee that the EIA update its 1999 to 2000 workon Federal energy subsidies, including any additions or deletions of Federal subsidies based on Administration orCongressional action since 2000, and providing an estimate of the size of each current subsidy. Subsidies directed toelectricity production are estimated on the basis of generation by fuel.

Information Center

2008-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

344

Memorandum for Federal NEPA Contacts: Emergency Actions and NEPA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This Council on Environmental Quality memorandum provides general information on (1) the response to hurricane Katrina; (2) reporting oil and chemical spills; (3) projected long term recovery efforts; and (4) how agencies can respond to emergencies and comply with NEPA.

345

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Order Granting Clarification  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

SUMMARY: In this Order Granting Clarification, the Commission addresses pending requests to clarify Form No. 552, under which natural gas market participants must annually report information regarding physical natural gas transactions that use an index or that contribute to or may contribute to the formation of a gas index. Order No. 704 required market participants to file these reports in order to provide greater transparency concerning the use of indices to price natural gas and how well index prices reflect market forces. Order No. 704-C revises Form No. 552 so as to (1) exempt from reporting any unexercised options to take gas under a take-or-release contract; (2) clarify the definition of exempt unprocessed natural gas transactions as those involving gas that is both not yet processed (to separate and recover natural gas liquids), and still upstream of a processing facility; (3) exempt from reporting cash-out and imbalance transactions, since they were burdensome to report and provided little market information; (4) strike the forms references to the blanket sales certificates issued under 284.402 or 284.284, sinceDocket No. RM07-10-002- 2-they were burdensome to report and provided little market information, so as to also

unknown authors

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

346

Federal Energy Management Program: Technologies  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Technologies Site Map Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Federal Energy Management Program: Technologies to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management...

347

Federal Energy Management Program: Commissioning  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Commissioning to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Commissioning on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Commissioning on Twitter...

348

Federal participation in LEED  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The federal government has been an active participant in the development and use of USGBC's Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design Green Building Rating System (LEED). This paper presents a review of this participation and some expectations for ongoing partnership.

Payne, Christopher; Dyer, Beverly

2004-11-10T23:59:59.000Z

349

DOE Federal Quality Council  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Federal Quality Council Note: Membership can be updated without re-approval of the Charter Name Org. Location Email Phone Colette Broussard HSS GTN colette.broussard@hq.doe.gov...

350

EXPLANATION OF SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

EXPLANATION OF SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES EXPLANATION OF SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES WELDON SPRING SITE February 2005 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management FINAL: ESD Weldon Spring Site February 2005 1 EXPLANATION OF SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES WELDON SPRING SITE I Introduction This document is an Explanation of Significant Differences (ESD) for three Records of Decision (RODs) for the Weldon Spring site located in St. Charles County, Missouri. These RODs were signed by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The RODs addressed by this ESD are the following: * Chemical Plant Operable Unit (CPOU) ROD, signed in September 1993. This ROD

351

Finding of No Significant Impact for the Offsite Transportation of Certain Low-Level and Mixed Radioactive Waste from Savannah River Site for Treatment and Disposal at Commercial and Government Facilities, DOE/EA-1308 (02/15/01)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact Finding of No Significant Impact for the Offsite Transportation of Certain Low-level and Mixed Radioactive Waste from the Savannah River Site for Treatment and Disposal at Commercial and Government Facilities Agency: U. S. Department of Energy Action: Finding of No Significant Impact Summary: The Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-1308) to analyze the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed offsite transportation of certain low-level radioactive waste (LLW) and mixed (i.e., hazardous and radioactive) low-level radioactive waste (MLLW) from the Savannah River Site (SRS), located near Aiken, South Carolina. Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE has determined that the action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting

352

Corrective Actions Process  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Stewardship Environmental Cleanup Corrective Actions Corrective Actions Process The general process for evaluating and remediating potential release sites is called...

353

Federal Energy Management Program: Water Efficiency Basics  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Basics Basics Graphic of the eTraining logo Training Available Managing Water Assessment in Federal Facilities: Learn how to manage the Water Assessment process in Federal facilities by taking this FEMP eTraining course. Although two-thirds of the Earth's surface is water, less than one-half of one percent of that water is currently available for our use. As the U.S. population increases, so does our water use, making water resources increasingly scarce. Many regions feel the strain. The Federal Government uses an estimated 148 to 165 billion gallons of potable water annually. This is equal to the annual water use of a state the size of New Jersey or almost 8 million people1. This is, in part, because water requires significant energy input for treatment, pumping, heating, and process uses. Water is integral to the cooling of power plants that provide energy to Federal facilities.

354

Increasing Federal Office Building Water Efficiency, Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) (Fact Sheet)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Order 13514 requires a two percent annual reduction in water use (compared to Order 13514 requires a two percent annual reduction in water use (compared to a FY 2007 baseline), significantly reducing total Federal water consumption by FY 2020. View Federal water requirements at www.femp.energy.gov/program/waterefficiency_ requirements.html. Increasing Federal Office Building Water Efficiency With less than one percent of Earth's water available for human use, the Federal Government is leading by example with water efficiency and conservation efforts. Federal laws and regulations require agencies to implement water efficiency efforts and reduce water consumption, making water an integral part of every comprehensive resource management program. Water Management Planning A comprehensive water management plan includes clear information on

355

Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practicee on Federal Landscaped Grounds  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

W W A S H I N G T O N April 26, 1994 MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES SUBJECT: Environmentally and Economically Beneficial Practicee on Federal Landscaped Grounds The Report of the National Performance Review contains recommendations for a series of environmental actions, including one to increase environmentally and economically beneficial landscaping practices at Federal facilities and federally funded project.. Environmentally beneficial landscaping entail. utilizing techniques that complement and enhance the local environment and seek to minimize the adverse effects that the landscaping will have on it. In particular, this means using regionally native plants and employing landscaping practices and technologies that conserve water

356

Established and Revised Federal Agency NEPA Procedures, 2000 - 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Revised Federal Agency NEPA Procedures, 2000 - 2011 and Revised Federal Agency NEPA Procedures, 2000 - 2011 ` Established and Revised Federal Agency NEPA Procedures Last Updated on January 11, 2013 Department/Agency Action Title/Citation Federal Register Notice(s) 2000 Department of Health and Human Services Revised NEPA Procedures Revised General Administration Manual, HHS Part 30, Environmental Protection Published for comment on January 11, 1999 (64 Federal Register [FR] 1655). Published as final procedures on February 25, 2000 (65 FR 10229). Bureau of Reclamation Department of the Interior Notice of Availability of a Draft Agency Handbook on the National Environmental Policy Act Department Manual (DM) Part 516, Chapter 6: Managing the NEPA Process (Appendix 7) Published on April 20, 2000 (65 FR 21210) with

357

EA-1290: Disposition of Russian Federation Titled Natural Uranium |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

290: Disposition of Russian Federation Titled Natural Uranium 290: Disposition of Russian Federation Titled Natural Uranium EA-1290: Disposition of Russian Federation Titled Natural Uranium SUMMARY This EA evaluates the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to transport up to an average of 9,000 metric tons per year of natural uranium as uranium hexafluoride (UF6) from the United States to the Russian Federation. This amount of uranium is equivalent to 13,3000 metric tons of UF6. The EA also examines the impacts of this action on the global commons. Transfer of natural UF6 to the Russian Federation is part of a joint U.S./Russian program to dispose of highly enriched uranium (HEU) from dismantled Russian nuclear weapons. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD

358

Recovery Act Federal Register Notices | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Information Center » Recovery Act » Recovery Act Federal Register Information Center » Recovery Act » Recovery Act Federal Register Notices Recovery Act Federal Register Notices October 12, 2011 Federal Register Notice (PDF Version) on the DOE's invitation for public comment on its request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to extend for three years the Information Collection Request Title: OE Recovery Act Financial Assistance Grants, OMB Control No. 1910-5149 that DOE is developing for submission to OMB pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Comments due on or before November 7, 2011. OMB Form 83-I. ICR Supporting Statement. SGIG Reporting Guidance. Notice of OMB Action (January 10, 2012): OMB has approved DOE's request to extend information collection for three years. August 10, 2011 Federal Register Notice (PDF Version ) on the DOE's invitation for

359

Notices ACTION: Notice of Open Teleconference Meeting.  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

05 Federal Register 05 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 160 / Monday, August 19, 2013 / Notices ACTION: Notice of Open Teleconference Meeting. SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee (ASCAC). The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of these meetings be announced in the Federal Register. DATES: Tuesday, September 3, 2013, 12:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. ADDRESSES: The meeting is open to the public. To access the call: 1. Dial Toll-Free Number: 866-740- 1260 (U.S. & Canada) 2. International participants dial: http://www.readytalk.com/intl 3. Enter access code 8083012, followed by ''#'' To ensure we have sufficient access lines for the public, we request that members of the public notify the DFO,

360

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Utility Partnership Working  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Utility Partnership Working Group Utility Partnership Working Group The Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) establishes partnerships and facilitates communications among Federal agencies, utilities, and energy service companies. The group develops strategies to implement cost-effective energy efficiency and water conservation projects through utility incentive programs at Federal sites. The mission and objectives of the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group are to: Enhance existing or foster new partnerships between Federal agencies and their servicing utilities to identify, develop, and implement cost-effective energy efficiency, water conservation, and renewable energy projects at Federal sites Identify how utilities can help Federal agencies meet energy management goals required by legislation

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Federal Acquisition Regulation Federal Acquisition Circular 59  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

59 59 Item Subject FAR Case ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I. Prohibition on Contracting With Inverted Domestic Corporations 2012-013 II. Free Trade Agreement--Colombia 2012-012 III. Revision of Cost Accounting Standards Threshold 2012-003 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- These rules were published in the Federal Register on May 10, 2012 at 77 FR 27546 Item I--Prohibition on Contracting With Inverted Domestic Corporations This interim rule implements section 738 of Division C of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012 (Pub. L. 112-74), which prohibits the award of contracts using Fiscal Year 2012 appropriated funds to any foreign incorporated entity that is treated as

362

Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands (216(h)) |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands (216(h)) Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands (216(h)) Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands (216(h)) On October 23, 2009, the Department of Energy and eight other Federal agencies entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to improve coordination among project applicants, federal agencies, states and tribes involved in the siting and permitting process for electric transmission facilities on Federal land. The MOU will improve uniformity, consistency, and transparency by describing each entity's role and responsibilities when project applicants wish to build electric transmission facilities. Additionally, the MOU designates a "Lead Agency" serving as the single point-of-contact for coordinating all federal environmental reviews

363

LM Significant Environmental Aspects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

LM evaluates all of our activities for their potential impact on the environment, andidentifies those aspects that could have a significant impact if they were not controlled. This information is...

364

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Request for Information seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal authorizations. This notice announces an extension of the public comment period for submitting comments regarding the IIP Process to October 31, 2013. Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting

365

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Request for Information seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal authorizations. This notice announces an extension of the public comment period for submitting comments regarding the IIP Process to October 31, 2013. Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting

366

Energy-Efficient Product Procurement for Federal Agencies (Brochure), Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

EPAct 2005 mandates Federal agen- EPAct 2005 mandates Federal agen- cies to incorporate energy efficiency criteria into relevant contracts and specifications. * The Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007 [amend- ing NECPA Section 8259b], E.O. 13423, and E.O. 13221 require Federal agencies to purchase energy- consuming products with a low standby power level of 1 watt or less. * E.O. 13514 requires 95 percent of new contract actions, task orders, and delivery orders for products and services to be energy efficient, water efficient, bio-based, envi- ronmentally preferable [Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool (EPEAT) certified], non-ozone depleting, contain recycled content, or non-toxic or less toxic alternatives where such products meet agency performance requirements.

367

Energy-Efficient Product Procurement for Federal Agencies (Brochure), Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

* EPAct 2005 mandates Federal agen- * EPAct 2005 mandates Federal agen- cies to incorporate energy efficiency criteria into relevant contracts and specifications. * The Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007 [amend- ing NECPA Section 8259b], E.O. 13423, and E.O. 13221 require Federal agencies to purchase energy- consuming products with a low standby power level of 1 watt or less. * E.O. 13514 requires 95 percent of new contract actions, task orders, and delivery orders for products and services to be energy efficient, water efficient, bio-based, envi- ronmentally preferable [Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool (EPEAT) certified], non-ozone depleting, contain recycled content, or non-toxic or less toxic alternatives where such products meet agency performance requirements.

368

Federal Energy Management Program: Metering  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Metering to Metering to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Metering on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Metering on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Metering on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Metering on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Metering on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Metering on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Operations & Maintenance Federal Requirements Program Management Commissioning Metering Systems Approaches Process Computerized Maintenance Management Systems Maintenance Types Major Equipment Types Resources Contacts Greenhouse Gases Water Efficiency Data Center Energy Efficiency Industrial Facilities

369

Federal Information Systems Security Educators' Association ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Federal Information Systems Security Educators' Association (FISSEA). Summary: The Federal Information Systems Security ...

2013-01-15T23:59:59.000Z

370

Federal Employees Group Life Insurance (FEGLI)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

*. Bookmark and Share. Federal Employees Group Life Insurance (FEGLI). Contact Human Resources. Through the Federal ...

2010-10-05T23:59:59.000Z

371

Federal Computer Security Program Managers' Forum (Forum ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Federal Computer Security Program Managers' Forum. Summary: The Federal Computer Security Program Managers' Forum ...

2013-01-15T23:59:59.000Z

372

Technical Advisory Committee to Develop a Federal ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Technical Advisory Committee to Develop a Federal Information Processing Standard for the Federal Key Management Infrastructure. ...

373

Federal Real Property Council Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Real Property Council Federal Real Property Council Guidance for Improved Asset Management December 22, 2004 Federal Real Property Council Guidance for Improved Asset Management Table of Contents I. Overview............................................................................. 1 II. Guiding Principles .................................................................... 3 III. Asset Management Plan - Required Components............................... 4 IV. Asset Management Plan - "Shelf Document".................................. 5 V. Inventory Data Elements and Performance Measures Definitions.......... 26 i Federal Real Property Council Guidance for Improved Asset Management I. Overview On February 4, 2004, President Bush signed Executive Order 13327, "Federal Real Property

374

Federal Railroad Administration  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Legislation Legislation Kevin R. Blackwell FRA Hazmat Division Washington, DC Federal Railroad Safety Accountability and Improvement Act of 2007 (FRSAIA)-H.R. 1516 /S. 918 DOT supports this reauthorization bill over H.R. 2095 The provisions of H.R. 2095, while not exactly the same, are very similar to this bill in regard to the core provisions Core provisions: Review and reform the Federal hours of service requirements Establish a new risk reduction program alongside the current existing safety program, and Mandate reporting by States and railroads to the DOT's National Crossing Inventory Federal Railroad Safety Improvement Act of 2007 (FRSIA) - H.R. 2095 Letter from DOT's General Counsel's office addressing DOT's

375

Federal Metering Requirements  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Metering Requirements Metering Requirements FUPWG - May 23, 2013 Brad Gustafson Federal Energy Management Program 2 42 USC 8253 - ENERGY MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENT (e) Metering By October 1, 2012, in accordance with guidelines established by the Secretary under paragraph (2), all Federal buildings shall, for the purposes of efficient use of energy and reduction in the cost of electricity used in such buildings, be metered. Each agency shall use, to the maximum extent practicable, advanced meters or advanced metering devices that provide data at least daily and that measure at least hourly consumption of electricity in the Federal buildings of the agency. Not later than October 1, 2016, each agency shall provide for equivalent metering of natural gas and steam, in accordance with guidelines established by the Secretary

376

Federal Railroad Administration  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transportation Transportation Federal Railroad Administration Overview of Proposed Rail Safety & Security Rulemakings Kevin R. Blackwell FRA Hazmat Division Washington, DC Federal Authority DOT Authority to regulate safety and security of hazardous materials transportation Hazardous Materials Transportation Law (49 U.S.C. 5101 et.seq.) Federal Railroad Safety Act (49 U.S.C. 20101 et.seq.) TSA Authority to regulate security of hazardous material transportation Aviation Transportation Security Act (Pub. L. 107-71, 115 Stat. 597) Routing as a Part of the Transportation Cycle Routing decisions are continually made as a part of the transportation cycle for a variety of reasons. E c o n o m i c s Security S a f e t y Routing Decision Pyramid DOT NPRM HM-232E NPRM published on December 21, 2006.

377

Microsoft Word - 8-7-08 URTAC Federal Regiser Notice of Meeting Sept 11, 2008  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Register: August 5, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 151)] Federal Register: August 5, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 151)] [Notices] [Page 45430] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr05au08-39] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Unconventional Resources Technology Advisory Committee AGENCY: Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy. ACTION: Notice of open meeting. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Unconventional Resources Technology Advisory Committee. Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that notice of these meetings be announced in the Federal Register.

378

Federal Railroad Administration  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE TRANSPORTATION EXTERNAL WORKING GROUP MEETING Pueblo, CO. September 20, 2005 Presented by Kevin R. Blackwell Radioactive Materials/Hazardous Materials Specialist Federal Railroad Administration - HQ Hazmat Division, Washington, DC. Federal Railroad Administration Dedicated Train Study - Report to Congress November 2003 - FRA' s Ofc. Of Research & Development (RDV), as lead on the Dedicated Train Study (DTS), received draft final report from the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (VNTSC), the contractor conducting the study. February, 2004 - FRA completed review of DFR and submitted editorial corrections back to VNTSC. Final draft of the DTS with editorial corrections received from VNTSC in February, 2004. March to September 2004 -

379

EA-1863: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

63: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1863: Finding of No Significant Impact Based on the Final EA, DOE has determined that the project (Proposed Action) would not constitute a...

380

EA-1739: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1739: Finding of No Significant Impact Bandon-Rogue Transmission Line Rebuild Project BPA needs to take action to ensure the integrity and...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Federal Acquisition Regulation; Federal Acquisition Circular  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2005-37; Introduction Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005-37 List of Rules in FAC 2005-37 Item Subject I. Registry of Disaster Response Contractors II. Limiting Length of Noncompetitive Contracts in "Unusual and Compelling Urgency" Circumstances III. GAO Access to Contractor Employees IV. Use of Commercial Services Item Authority V. Limitations on Pass-Through Charges VI. Award Fee Language Revision VII. National Response Framework VIII. Technical Amendments SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Summaries for each FAR rule follow. Item I-Registry of Disaster Response Contractors (FAR Case 2008-035) This interim rule amends the FAR at parts 2, 4, 7, 10, 13, 18, 26, and 52 to implement the Registry of Disaster Response Contractors provision, section 697 of the Department of

382

Finding of No Significant Impact for the Construction and Operation of the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC), California (DOE/EA-1426) (2/28/03)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Finding of No Significant Impact Construction and Operation of the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC), California. AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA), DOE/EA-1426, evaluating the proposed action to construct and operate the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC). Based upon the information and analyses in the EA, the DOE has determined that the proposed federal action does not significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.

383

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Federal Facility Agreement, June 29, 1992 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site 300) Site 300) Agreement Name Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Federal Facility Agreement Under CERCLA Section 120, June 29, 1992 State California Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, implementing, and monitoring appropriate response actions at the Site Parties DOE; USEPA; California Department of Toxic Substances Control; Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board Date 6/29/1992 SCOPE * Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, implementing, and monitoring appropriate response actions at the Site. * Identify operable units (OUs) which are appropriate at the Site prior to the implementation of final remedial action(s).

384

EA-1497: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

97: Finding of No Significant Impact 97: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1497: Finding of No Significant Impact Strategic Petroleum Reserve West Hackberry Facility Raw Water Intake Pipeline Replacement, Cameron and Calcasieu Parishes, Louisiana DOE has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA), DOE/EA-1497, for the proposed replacement of the existing 107 centimeter (cm) [42 inch (in)] 6.87 kilometer (km) [4.27 mile (mi)] raw water intake pipeline (RWIPL). This action is necessary to allow for continued, optimum operations at the West Hackberry facility (main site/facility). The EA described the proposed action (including action alternatives) and three alternatives to the proposed action. The EA evaluated only the potential environmental consequences of the proposed action (one action alternative), and

385

The U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) jointly submitted to Congress a required "Implementation Proposal for The National Action Plan on Demand Response." The U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) jointly submitted to Congress a required "Implementation Proposal for The National Action Plan on Demand Response." August 1, 2011 - 1:59pm Addthis The U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) jointly submitted to Congress a required "Implementation Proposal for The National Action Plan on Demand Response." Addthis Related Articles Implementation Proposal for The National Action Plan on Demand Response DOE and FERC Joint Public Statement on Back Stop Siting

386

Federal Energy Management Program: News  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PROJECT FUNDING PROJECT FUNDING TECHNOLOGIES SERVICES NEWS & EVENTS EERE » Federal Energy Management Program » News & Events Site Map Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Federal Energy Management Program: News to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: News on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: News on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: News on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: News on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: News on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: News on AddThis.com... News Events News Subscribe to RSS News Feed RSS Feed icon January 13, 2014 FEMP Offers New Advanced eTraining on UESCs The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Federal Energy Management Program

387

Federal Facility Agreement for the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Facility Agreement for the Paducah Gaseous Federal Facility Agreement for the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant State Kentucky Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA/RCRA Scope Summary Ensure that the environmental impacts of activities at the Site are investigated and appropriate response actions are taken. Parties U.S. DOE; Kentucky Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Cabinet; U.S. EPA Date 2/01/1998 SCOPE * Ensure all releases of hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants are addressed to achieve comprehensive remediation of the site. * Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, implementing, and monitoring response actions in accordance with CERCLA, RCRA, and Kentucky Law. * Facilitate cooperation, exchange of information, and participation of the Parties and

388

EA-1628: Finding of No Significant Impact | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

628: Finding of No Significant Impact 628: Finding of No Significant Impact EA-1628: Finding of No Significant Impact Construction and Operation of a Proposed Lignocellulosic Biorefinery, POET Project LIBERTY, LLC, Emmetsburg, Iowa The Department of Energy proposes to provide financial assistance (the Proposed Action) to POET Project LIBERTY, LLC (POET) for the construction and operation of the lignocellulosic ethanol production facility (Project LIBERTY) near the City of Emmetsburg, Iowa. Mitigation Action Plan for the Environmental Assessment, Notice of Wetlands Involvement and Finding of No Significant Impact for Construction and Operation of a Proposed Lignocellulosic Biorefinery, Emmetsburg, Iowa, DOE/EA-1628 (September 2008) More Documents & Publications EA-1628: Mitigation Action Plan

389

Federal Memorandum of Understanding for Hydropower/Federal Inland...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

of Energy Environmental Protection Agency Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Fish and Wildlife Service Forest Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration...

390

Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 335: Area 6 Injection Well and Drain Pit, Nevada Test Site, Nevada  

SciTech Connect

This Closure Report documents the activities undertaken to close Corrective Action Unit 335: Area 6 Injection Well and Drain Pit, according to the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Corrective Action Unit 335 was closed in accordance with the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection-approved Corrective Action Plan for Corrective Action Unit 335.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office; Bechtel Nevada

2003-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

391

MEMORANDUM FOR FEDERAL PROCUREMENT DIRECTORS FROM: DIRECTOR  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2009 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR FEDERAL PROCUREMENT DIRECTORS FROM: DIRECTOR OFFICE OF PROCUREMENT AND ASSISTANCE MANAGEMENT SUBJECT: Changes to the Balanced Scorecard Program The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) performance management methodology has played a significant role in helping the Office of Procurement and Assistance Management assess the performance of the Department's Federal procurement offices and the purchasing organizations of its major site and facility contractors. This methodology provides the conceptual framework for creating, communicating, collecting and arraying performance objectives, measures, targets, and initiatives. Over the years, we have used the BSC assessment results to identify and monitor desired organizational changes, to expose problem areas needing management attention, to

392

Civil Penalty Actions For Certification Violations Resolved | Department of  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Civil Penalty Actions For Certification Violations Resolved Civil Penalty Actions For Certification Violations Resolved Civil Penalty Actions For Certification Violations Resolved May 6, 2010 - 12:39pm Addthis Today, the Department of Energy announced that it had resolved civil penalty actions against four showerhead manufacturers for having violated the Department's water conservation certification regulations. To resolve these actions Zoe Industries, Altmans Products LLC, EZ-FLO International, and Watermark Designs Ltd. have now certified that their showerheads meet federal water conservation standards and collectively will pay civil penalties of $165,104. DOE had initiated cases against the four manufacturers on January 25th, alleging that they had failed to submit required documents to DOE demonstrating compliance with federal

393

Civil Penalty Actions For Certification Violations Resolved | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Civil Penalty Actions For Certification Violations Resolved Civil Penalty Actions For Certification Violations Resolved Civil Penalty Actions For Certification Violations Resolved May 6, 2010 - 12:39pm Addthis Today, the Department of Energy announced that it had resolved civil penalty actions against four showerhead manufacturers for having violated the Department's water conservation certification regulations. To resolve these actions Zoe Industries, Altmans Products LLC, EZ-FLO International, and Watermark Designs Ltd. have now certified that their showerheads meet federal water conservation standards and collectively will pay civil penalties of $165,104. DOE had initiated cases against the four manufacturers on January 25th, alleging that they had failed to submit required documents to DOE demonstrating compliance with federal

394

Federal Energy Management Program: News  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

News & Events Site Map Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Federal Energy Management Program: News to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program:...

395

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FOR THE NECO (HAXTUN) WIND ENERGY PROJECT  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NECO (HAXTUN) WIND ENERGY PROJECT NECO (HAXTUN) WIND ENERGY PROJECT LOGAN AND PHILLIPS COUNTIES, COLORADO DOE/EA-1812 AGENCY: U.S . Department of Energy, Western Area Power Administration ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact SUMMARY: Western Area Power Administration (Western) is a power marketing administration in the U.S . Department of Energy (DOE). The DOE Golden Field Office (Golden Field Office) provided Federal funding appropriated under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 to Phillips County under the Community Renewable Energy Development Program (CRED). ·Phillips County proposes to use $2.55 million in CRED funding to facilitate and paiiially fund the design, permitting, and construction of the Haxtun Wind Project (now called the NECO Wind Project). The proposed project is an approximately

396

Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Information on Improving Performance of Federal Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 168 - August 29, 2013 Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 168 - August 29, 2013 The Department of Energy's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, in collaboration with the Member Agencies of the Steering Committee (Member Agencies) created under Executive Order 13604 of March 22, 2012, and pursuant to the June 7, 2013 Transmission Presidential Memorandum, is seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal Authorization(s).

397

Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities October 4, 2013 - 4:41pm Addthis The Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities provides significant financial evidence from research findings and case studies that sustainable design is a smart business choice. The 20-page brochure and the full document provide data and information indicating that sustainable design does not have to increase first costs and yields economic, social, and environmental benefits to building owners and society. Read the Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities brochure. Download the Business Case for Sustainable Design in Federal Facilities full document. Contact For additional information about the Business Case for Sustainable Design

398

Federal Technology Deployment Pilot: Exterior Solid State Lighting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Technology Deployment Federal Technology Deployment Pilot: Exterior Solid State Lighting Jeff McCullough, LC October 24, 2011 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, Washington 2 | FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM femp.energy.gov * Overview of DOE's Solid-State Lighting Program * Federal Technology Deployment Pilot: Exterior Solid State Lighting * FEMP Technology Deployment Matrix This Morning's Topics 3 | FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM femp.energy.gov Energy Savings Potential of Solid-State Lighting SSL Multi-Year Program Plan, May 2011: http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/publications/pdfs/ssl/ssl_mypp2011_web.pdf 4 | FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM femp.energy.gov A Market in Motion * Tsunami of new products coming to market * Significant learning curve for

399

Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products August 2012 Update |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 2012 Update August 2012 Update Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products August 2012 Update October 22, 2013 - 11:17am Addthis Welcome to the sixth issue of Federal Energy-Efficient Product Procurement! This bi-monthly update helps Federal procurement officials, facility managers, and others remain up to date on events, training, technology, and changes to acquisition requirements. What do you think? Your feedback is very important to us. To subscribe, submit articles, suggest topics, or give us your feedback, contact Amanda Sahl. For more information about energy-efficient product procurement, visit femp.energy.gov/procurement. In This Issue: Commit to Efficiency for Energy Action Month Low Standby Product List Updates End of Year Procurement Purchasing Pathways Nominate Your Building for the 2013 Better Buildings Federal Award

400

Mound Plant Federal Facility Agreement, July 15, 1993 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

United States Environmental Protection Agency Region V United States Environmental Protection Agency Region V and the State of Ohio Federal Facility Agreement State Ohio Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary DOE shall identify Interim Remedial Actions (IRAs) alternatives and implement US EPA and OEPA approved remedies for the site in accordance with CERCLA Parties EPA; Ohio EPA (OEPA); DOE Date 07/15/1993 SCOPE * Identify Interim Remedial Action (IRA) alternatives which include Remedial Investigations (RI) and Feasibility Studies (FS); design and implement US EPA and OEPA approved remedies for the Mound site in accordance with CERCLA. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * After approval of remedial design and action plans, DOE shall prepare and provide to U.S. EPA and OEPA written monthly progress reports.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Federal Railroad Administration  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Safety & Security Safety & Security Rulemakings Kevin R. Blackwell FRA Hazmat Division Washington, DC Federal Authority DOT Authority to regulate safety and security of hazardous materials transportation Hazardous Materials Transportation Law (49 U.S.C. 5101 et.seq.) Federal Railroad Safety Act (49 U.S.C. 20101 et.seq.) TSA Authority to regulate security of hazardous material transportation Aviation Transportation Security Act (Pub. L. 107-71, 115 Stat. 597) Routing as a Part of the Transportation Cycle Routing decisions are continually made as a part of the transportation cycle for a variety of reasons. Security Routing Decision Pyramid DOT NPRM HM-232E NPRM published on December 21, 2006. Seeks to clarify and enhance existing regulations. Rail Carriers who transport carloads of more than 5000 lbs of 1.1, 1.2, or 1.3

402

Related Federal Climate Efforts  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Related Federal Climate Efforts Print E-mail Related Federal Climate Efforts Print E-mail Interagency Task Force on Carbon Capture and Storage The Interagency Task Force on Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is a group of technologies for capturing, compressing, transporting and permanently storing power plant and industrial source emissions of carbon dioxide. Rapid development and deployment of clean coal technologies, particularly CCS, will help position the United States as a leader in the global clean energy race. Climate Change Adaptation Task Force The Task Force's work has been guided by a strategic vision of a resilient, healthy, and prosperous Nation in the face of a changing climate. To achieve this vision, the Task Force identified a set of guiding principles that public and private decision-makers should consider in designing and implementing adaptation strategies.

403

Federal Technical Capability Program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Technical Capability Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) Home About the FTCP FTCP Topics FTCP Meetings Performance Indicator Reports Guiding Documents Qualifying Official Training Approaches FTCP Plans, Reports & Issue Papers Workforce Analysis & Staffing Site Specific Information Nuclear Executive Leadership Training General Information 2004-1 FTCP Commitments FTCP Correspondence Site Map Contact Us Quick Reference Departmental Representative to the DNFSB Facility Representative Safety System Oversight DOE Integrated Safety Management National Training Center DOE Directives Program DOE Technical Standards Program DOE Phone Book HSS Logo FTCP FTCP Topics DOE Strategic Human Capital Plan (FY 2006 - 2011) New Directions in Learning: Building a DOE University System May 4, 2007, the Deputy Secretary memorandum designating Karen Boardman the FTCP Chairperson.

404

Federal Railroad Administration  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Update Du Update Du Jour Department Of Energy Transportation External Coordination Working Group Meeting Albuquerque, New Mexico April 21-23, 2004 Presented by Kevin R. Blackwell Radioactive Materials Program Manager Federal Railroad Administration Federal Railroad Administration Dedicated Train Study- Report to Congress FRA' s Research & Development Office (as lead on the study) received a draft final report from the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (VNTSC) in late November, 2003. Editorial corrections were made and a final draft dated February, 2004 was provided to FRA. Final Draft Report FRA has been reviewed and been sent to FRA Administrator for clearance and forwarding to DOT OST. FRA has already "Officially Coordinated" and briefed DOT OST and

405

Smart Grid Federal Advisory Committee  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

NIST Director's Update Smart Grid Federal Advisory Committee ... NAESB Standardized Energy Usage Information Model [PAP10] ... Standards Policy ...

2013-01-09T23:59:59.000Z

406

Federal Authorities | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Authorities Electricity Advisory Committee Technology Development Electricity Policy Coordination and Implementation DOE Grid Tech Team Energy Assurance Coordination and...

407

1999 Federal energy saver showcases  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Sixteen-page booklet containing case studies of the nine Federal Energy Saver Showcase award recipients for 1999.

Nahan, R.

2000-07-03T23:59:59.000Z

408

Federal Agencies Leading by Example  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Article on Federal agencies leading by example with water efficiency and conservation efforts. Prepared for Colorado WaterWise Newsletter.

McMordie-Stoughton, Katherine L.

2011-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

409

Federal Buildings Supplemental Survey 1993  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 3.25. Water-Heating Equipment in FBSS Buildings in Federal Region 3, Number of Buildings and...

410

Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Savings Performance...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Financing Specialists to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Savings Performance Contract Federal Financing Specialists on Facebook Tweet...

411

Federal Energy Management Year in Review 2002  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT YEAR IN REVIEW 2002 United States Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Federal Energy...

412

Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Savings Performance...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of Energy - Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Federal Energy Management Program Energy Savings Performance Contract Federal Financing Specialists FEMP's Federal financing...

413

National Action Plan on Demand Response  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

David Kathan, Ph.D David Kathan, Ph.D Federal Energy Regulatory Commission U.S. DOE Electricity Advisory Committee October 29, 2010 Demand Response as Power System Resources The author's views do not necessarily represent the views of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 2 Demand Response * FERC (Order 719) defines demand response as: - A reduction in the consumption of electric energy by customers from their expected consumption in response to an increase in the price of electric energy or to in incentive payments designed to induce lower consumption of electric energy. * The National Action Plan on Demand Response released by FERC staff broadens this definition to include - Consumer actions that can change any part of the load profile of a utility or region, not just the period of peak usage

414

The Federal Reserve as Lender of Last Resort during the Panic of 2008  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Since the onset of the financial crisis in late 2007, the US Federal Reserve (Fed) has, as of December 29, extended roughly $1.2 trillion in credit to the private sector in an effort to restore financial stability. These actions have altered the size and composition of the Feds balance sheet in ways not seen since its founding in 1914. According to Alan Meltzer, author of the definitive history of the Federal Reserve, [such an extension of credit] is unique, and the Fed has never done something like this before. If you go all the way back to 1921, when farms were failing and Congress was leaning on the Fed to bail them out, the Fed always said Its not our business. It never regarded itself as an all-purpose agency. 1 This report examines the impact of the Feds unprecedented lending on its formulation and implementation of monetary policy. The first section provides some background on the Feds recent actions within the context of its role as lender of last resort (LOLR). The second outlines some of the ways in which the surge in Fed lending has affected the implementation of monetary policy. The third and fourth sections respectively discuss the degree to which the Fed has exposed itself to default risk, and the consequences for monetary policy if the Fed were to experience significant losses on its loans to the private sector.

Kenneth N. Kuttner

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

415

Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 322: Areas 1 and 3 Release Sites and Injection Wells Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Rev. No. 0  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Decision Document has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 322, Areas 1 and 3 Release Sites and Injection Wells, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, in accordance with the ''Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order'' (1996). Corrective Action Unit 322 is comprised of the following corrective action sites (CASs): (1) 01-25-01 - AST Release Site; (2) 03-25-03 - Mud Plant and AST Diesel Release; and (3) 03-20-05 - Injection Wells and BOP Shop. The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document is to identify and provide the rationale for the recommendation of a corrective action alternative for each CAS within CAU 322. Corrective action investigation activities were performed from April 2004 through September 2004, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan. The purposes of the activities as defined during the data quality objectives process were: (1) Determine if contaminants of concern (COCs) are present; (2) If COCs are present, determine their nature and extent; and (3) Provide sufficient information and data to recommend appropriate corrective actions for the CASs. Analytes detected during the corrective action investigation were evaluated against appropriate preliminary action levels to identify contaminants of concern for each corrective action site. Radiological field measurements were compared to unrestricted release criteria. Assessment of the data generated from investigation activities revealed the following: (1) CAS 01-25-01 contains an AST berm contaminated with total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) diesel-range organics (DRO). (2) CAS 03-25-03 includes two distinct areas: Area A where no contamination remains from a potential spill associated with an AST, and Area B where TPH-DRO contamination associated with various activities at the mud plant was identified. The Area B contamination was found at various locations and depths. (3) CAS 03-25-03 Area B contains TPH-DRO contamination at various locations and depths in the area associated with the Mud Plant. (4) CAS 03-20-05 contains TPH-DRO, metals, and radiological contamination within the injection well casing soil and TPH-DRO contamination at the depth coincidental with the bottom of the injection well sump. Based on the evaluation of analytical data from the corrective action investigation, review of future and current operations in Areas 1 and 3 of the Nevada Test Site, and the detailed and comparative analysis of the potential corrective action alternatives, the following corrective actions are recommended for the Corrective Action Unit 322 CASs. Closure in Place with Administrative Controls is the preferred corrective action for the following CASs: (1) CAS 01-25-01, removal of TPH-DRO contamination would pose a significant safety hazard due to the site location. (2) CAS 03-25-03 No contamination remains at Area A (AST Berm); and thus, no further action is the preferred alternative at this part of the CAS. However at Area B, TPH-DRO contamination is varied in concentration and location and the footprint of the CAS is large, removal of contaminated ''pockets'' would be laborious and cost prohibitive. The plutonium-239 surface contamination identified at CAS 03-25-03 Area B has been removed and drummed as a best management practice. (3) CAS 03-20-05, TPH-DRO, metals, and radiological contamination are present in the injection well casing soils. Recommend corrective action includes removal of the liquid in the injection well sump (approximately 3 feet (ft) of liquid at 60 ft below ground surface), grouting the sump, and the area within the injection well casing.

Robert Boehlecke

2004-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

416

DOE/EA-1636: Finding of No Significant Impact for the Albany-Burnt Woods and Santiam-Toledo Pole Replacement Project EA (March 2009)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Albany-Burnt Woods and Santiam-Toledo Pole Replacement Project Albany-Burnt Woods and Santiam-Toledo Pole Replacement Project Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) and Floodplain Statement of Findings DOE/EA-1636 Summary The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) announces its environmental findings on the Albany- Burnt Woods and Santiam-Toledo Pole Replacement Project. This project involves replacing wood pole structures on the existing Albany-Burnt Woods single-circuit, 115-kilovolt (kV) transmission line and along a portion of the existing Santiam-Toledo single circuit, 230-kV transmission line. BPA has prepared an environmental assessment (DOE/EA-1636) evaluating the proposed project and its alternative. Based on the analysis in the EA, BPA has determined that the Proposed Action is not a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, within the

417

Finding of No Significant Impact for the Storage of Tritium-Producing Burnable Absorber Rods in K-Area Transfer Bay at the Savannah River Site (DOE/EA-1528) (06/01/05)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the the Storage of Tritium-Producing Burnable Absorber Rods in K-Area Transfer Bay at the Savannah River Site Agency: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Action: Finding of No Significant Impact Summary: The DOE Savannah River Operations Office (SR) and the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Savannah River Site Office (SRSO) have prepared an environmental assessment (EA), DOE/EA-1528, to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the temporary dry storage of a cask containing Tritium- Producing Burnable Absorber Rods (TPBARs) in the Transfer Bay in K Area at the Savannah River Site (SRS). Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the

418

NNSA PERSONNEL SECURITY CLEARANCE ACTION REQUEST Required: SUBJECT INFORMATION  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PERSONNEL SECURITY PERSONNEL SECURITY CLEARANCE ACTION REQUEST Required: SUBJECT INFORMATION Contractor Federal Name (Last, First, Middle): Suffix: Date of Birth: Social Security Number: Place of Birth (city and state/country): Citizenship(s): Email Address: Employer (legal name): Job Title: Required: LOCATION/BILLING Work Location: Contracting Office Location/SON: Prime Contract Number: Sub-contract Number: Facility Code: Employer Code: Required: CLEARANCE ACTION Requested Action(s): Clearance Level: (for employer/contract above) Clearance History Never held a clearance Previously held Currently holds Key Management Personnel (KMP)? Human Reliability Program (HRP)? PERSONNEL SECURITY USE ONLY: DOE Clearance: Special Access Program (SAP)? Yes No CLEARANCE JUSTIFICATION NARRATIVE

419

Clean Slate 1 Corrective Action Plan, Revision 0  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Plan (CAP) has been prepared to meet the requirements specified in the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO, 1996). A Corrective Action Decision Document (CADD) (DOE, 1997) was submitted to the Nevada Department of Environmental Protection (NDEP) January 31, 1997 for the Clean Slate 1 (CS-1) Site in accordance with the Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) (DOE, 1996) and the Soils Media Operable Unit Quality Assurance Project Plan (DOE, 1995). The FFACO lists CS-1 as Corrective Action Unit (CAU) number 412.

NONE

1997-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

420

Develop an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Develop an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability Develop an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability Develop an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability October 8, 2013 - 11:50am Addthis Graphic showing 5 gears. They progress from Determine Goal to Identify Context-Rules, Roles and Tools to Develop Action Plan to Implement Plan to Measure and Evaluate. Institutional Change Continuous Improvement Cycle After establishing a goal and assessing the rules, roles, and tools, Federal agencies can develop an action plan (select the strategies that will be implemented over time to achieve and maintain energy and sustainability goals). This action plan should target specific audiences with tailored strategies and take into account the need to review and revise strategies in the long-term. The action plan must include appropriate metrics and regular

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Implement an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Implement an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability Implement an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability Implement an Institutional Change Action Plan for Sustainability October 8, 2013 - 11:54am Addthis Graphic showing 5 gears. They progress from Determine Goal to Identify Context-Rules, Roles and Tools to Develop Action Plan to Implement Plan to Measure and Evaluate. Institutional Change Continuous Improvement Cycle Writing a good action plan is one thing; implementing it is another. Institutional change principles and methods can be incorporated into action plans (program design), but on-the-ground implementation activities must also be conducted in a manner that is suitable to the organizational context and the people in the roles being targeted. Action plans lay out the set of strategies a Federal agency will roll out

422

Federal Energy Management Program: Services  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Services to Services to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Services on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Services on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Services on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Services on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Services on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Services on AddThis.com... Project Assistance Training Outreach Services The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) offers specialized services through: Technical and Project Assistance: Find resources for technical assistance and information about FEMP calls for projects. Training: Look up FEMP-produced live and on-demand courses, workshops, and webinars. Outreach: Get information about awards and campaigns that motivate energy-

423

North Slope (Wahluke Slope) expedited response action cleanup plan  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this action is to mitigate any threat to public health and the environment from hazards on the North Slope and meet the expedited response action (ERA) objective of cleanup to a degree requiring no further action. The ERA may be the final remediation of the 100-I-3 Operable Unit. A No Action record of decision (ROD) may be issued after remediation completion. The US Department of Energy (DOE) currently owns or administers approximately 140 mi{sup 2} (about 90,000 acres) of land north and east of the Columbia River (referred to as the North Slope) that is part of the Hanford Site. The North Slope, also commonly known as the Wahluke Slope, was not used for plutonium production or support facilities; it was used for military air defense of the Hanford Site and vicinity. The North Slope contained seven antiaircraft gun emplacements and three Nike-Ajax missile positions. These military positions were vacated in 1960--1961 as the defense requirements at Hanford changed. They were demolished in 1974. Prior to government control in 1943, the North Slope was homesteaded. Since the initiation of this ERA in the summer of 1992, DOE signed the modified Hanford Federal Agreement and Consent Order (Tri-Party Agreement) with the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in which a milestone was set to complete remediation activities and a draft closeout report by October 1994. Remediation activities will make the North Slope area available for future non-DOE uses. Thirty-nine sites have undergone limited characterization to determine if significant environmental hazards exist. This plan documents the results of that characterization and evaluates the potential remediation alternatives.

Not Available

1994-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

424

The Boston Federal Courthouse : institutional places and the national face  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Federal institutions are significant instruments for promoting national identity. In the United States these institutions, including the judicial system, claim authority from a point of origin (identified by such terms as ...

Williamson, June Pauline

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

425

Corrective Action Plan for Corrective Action Unit 262: Area 25 Septic Systems and Underground Discharge Point, Nevada Test Site, Nevada  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Plan (CAP) provides selected corrective action alternatives and proposes the closure methodology for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 262, Area 25 Septic Systems and Underground Discharge Point. CAU 262 is identified in the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) of 1996. Remediation of CAU 262 is required under the FFACO. CAU 262 is located in Area 25 of the Nevada Test Site (NTS), approximately 100 kilometers (km) (62 miles [mi]) northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. The nine Corrective Action Sites (CASs) within CAU 262 are located in the Nuclear Rocket Development Station complex. Individual CASs are located in the vicinity of the Reactor Maintenance, Assembly, and Disassembly (R-MAD); Engine Maintenance, Assembly, and Disassembly (E-MAD); and Test Cell C compounds. CAU 262 includes the following CASs as provided in the FFACO (1996); CAS 25-02-06, Underground Storage Tank; CAS 25-04-06, Septic Systems A and B; CAS 25-04-07, Septic System; CAS 25-05-03, Leachfield; CAS 25-05-05, Leachfield; CAS 25-05-06, Leachfield; CAS 25-05-08, Radioactive Leachfield; CAS 25-05-12, Leachfield; and CAS 25-51-01, Dry Well. Figures 2, 3, and 4 show the locations of the R-MAD, the E-MAD, and the Test Cell C CASs, respectively. The facilities within CAU 262 supported nuclear rocket reactor engine testing. Activities associated with the program were performed between 1958 and 1973. However, several other projects used the facilities after 1973. A significant quantity of radioactive and sanitary waste was produced during routine operations. Most of the radioactive waste was managed by disposal in the posted leachfields. Sanitary wastes were disposed in sanitary leachfields. Septic tanks, present at sanitary leachfields (i.e., CAS 25-02-06,2504-06 [Septic Systems A and B], 25-04-07, 25-05-05,25-05-12) allowed solids to settle out of suspension prior to entering the leachfield. Posted leachfields do not contain septic tanks. All CASs located in CAU 262 are inactive or abandoned. However, some leachfields may still receive liquids from runoff during storm events. Results from the 2000-2001 site characterization activities conducted by International Technology (IT) Corporation, Las Vegas Office are documented in the Corrective Action Investigation Report for Corrective Action Unit 262: Area 25 Septic Systems and Underground Discharge Point, Nevada Test Site, Nevada. This document is located in Appendix A of the Corrective Action Decision Document for CAU 262. Area 25 Septic Systems and Underground Discharge Point, Nevada Test Site, Nevada. (DOE/NV, 2001).

K. B. Campbell

2002-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

426

Federal Technology Portal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

eere.energy.gov eere.energy.gov BTP and FEMP Technology Portal March 15, 2012 2 eere.energy.gov Background * This presentation was developed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory at the request of the U.S. Department of Defense Tri-Services and the Federal Energy Management Program. * It incorporates initial feedback from representatives of the Interagency Task Force Technology Deployment Working Group. 3 eere.energy.gov Technology Readiness Levels 9. Actual system "flight proven" through successful mission operations 8. Actual system completed and "flight qualified" through test and demonstration 7. System prototype demonstration in a operational environment

427

Federal Technology Portal  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

BTP and FEMP Technology Portal March 15, 2012 2 eere.energy.gov Background * This presentation was developed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory at the request of the U.S. Department of Defense Tri-Services and the Federal Energy Management Program. * It incorporates initial feedback from representatives of the Interagency Task Force Technology Deployment Working Group. 3 eere.energy.gov Technology Readiness Levels 9. Actual system "flight proven" through successful mission operations 8. Actual system completed and "flight qualified" through test and demonstration 7. System prototype demonstration in a operational environment

428

Award Number: Federal Non-Federal Federal Non-Federal Total  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 Previous Edition Usable Total (5) f. Contractual g. Construction Section B - Budget Categories Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number Grant Program Function or Activity Estimated Unobligated Funds e. Supplies i. Total Direct Charges (sum of 6a-6h) Grant Program, Function or Activity Object Class Categories Authorized for Local Reproduction h. Other a. Personnel b. Fringe Benefits c. Travel d. Equipment 6. j. Indirect Charges k. Totals (sum of 6i-6j) Program Income Applicant Name: Budget Information - Non Construction Programs OMB Approval No. 0348-0044 New or Revised Budget Section A - Budget Summary

429

Award Number: Federal Non-Federal Federal Non-Federal Total  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

j. Indirect Charges j. Indirect Charges k. Totals (sum of 6i-6j) Program Income Applicant Name: Budget Information - Non Construction Programs OMB Approval No. 0348-0044 New or Revised Budget Section A - Budget Summary i. Total Direct Charges (sum of 6a-6h) Grant Program, Function or Activity Object Class Categories Authorized for Local Reproduction h. Other a. Personnel b. Fringe Benefits c. Travel d. Equipment 6. Total (5) f. Contractual g. Construction Section B - Budget Categories Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number Grant Program Function or Activity Estimated Unobligated Funds e. Supplies Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 Previous Edition Usable

430

FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROGRAM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROGRAM C C A A L L E E N N D D A A R R Y Y E E A A R R S S 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 - - 2 2 0 0 1 1 2 2 B B I I E E N N N N I I A A L L R R E E P P O O R R T T UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY November 2013 INTENTIONALLY BLANK FTCP 2011-2012 Biennial Report ~ 2 ~ Table of Contents Section Title Page 1.0 Purpose and Scope .......................................................................................... 3 2.0 2011/2012 Accomplishments.......................................................................... 3

431

Federal Technical Capability Program - Quarterly Performance Indicator  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Quarterly Performance Indicator Reports Quarterly Performance Indicator Reports 2013 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability August 16, 2013 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability June 5, 2013 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability February 20, 2013 2012 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability November 20, 2012 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability August 8, 2012 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability May 30, 2012 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability March 6, 2012 2011 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability November 10, 2011 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability August 24, 2011 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability May 18, 2011 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability February 23, 2011

432

Executive Order 13423- Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

423- Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management Executive Order 13423- Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management It...

433

Federal Spectrum Management at the National Telecommunications...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Slides from National Telecommunications and Information Administration's presentation on Federal spectrum management. Federal Spectrum Management at the National...

434

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 370: T-4 Atmospheric Test Site, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 370, T-4 Atmospheric Test Site, located in Area 4 at the Nevada Test Site, Nevada, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO). Corrective Action Unit 370 is comprised of Corrective Action Site (CAS) 04-23-01, Atmospheric Test Site T-4. The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 370 due to the implementation of the corrective action of closure in place with administrative controls. To achieve this, corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from June 25, 2008, through April 2, 2009, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 370: T-4 Atmospheric Test Site and Record of Technical Change No. 1.

Patrick Matthews

2009-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

435

Memorandum: Emergency Actions and NEPA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8, 2005 8, 2005 MEMORANDUM FOR FEDERAL NEPA CONTACTS FROM: HORST G. GRECZMIEL Associate Director for NEPA Oversight SUBJECT: Emergency Actions and NEPA This memorandum provides: * General information on the response to Katrina * Reporting oil and chemical spills * Projected long term recovery efforts * How agencies can respond to emergencies and comply with NEPA. Please distribute this memorandum to your agency planning and environmental personnel. General information on the response to Katrina: Information is available on the FEMA website at http://www.fema.gov and specifics on the government's response are provided at the "What Government is Doing" link which can be directly accessed at http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/interapp/editorial/editorial_0712.xml

436

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Technology Deployment Working  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Technology Deployment Working Group Technology Deployment Working Group Energy Department Announces Interagency Committee to Increase Use of Clean Energy Technologies in Federal Facilities The Senior Executive Committee for Technology Deployment, a subcommittee of the Interagency Technology Deployment Working Group, brings together leaders of technology deployment programs from across the federal government to implement the Obama Administration's comprehensive strategy to reduce energy costs in agency facilities, while boosting American competitiveness in the global clean energy race. Learn more. Technology Briefs Boiler Combustion Control and Monitoring System Doing Time under the Sun Wireless Sensor Networks for Data Centers The Federal Technology Deployment Working Group helps Federal agencies evaluate and deploy new and underutilized technologies.

437

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Procurement of Energy...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2011: Fluorescent Ballasts Fluorescent Luminaires Industrial Luminaires Commercial Boilers Standby Power Back to Top Low Standby Power Update Federal procurement officials must...

438

Federal Energy Management Program: 2001 Federal Energy and Water...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Skip to Content U.S. Department of Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy EERE Home | Programs & Offices | Consumer Information Federal Energy Management Program Search...

439

Federal Energy Management Program: 2010 Federal Energy and Water...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Skip to Content U.S. Department of Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy EERE Home | Programs & Offices | Consumer Information Federal Energy Management Program Search...

440

Federal Energy Management Program: 2002 Federal Energy and Water...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Skip to Content U.S. Department of Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy EERE Home | Programs & Offices | Consumer Information Federal Energy Management Program Search...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Federal Energy Management Program: 2004 Federal Energy and Water...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Skip to Content U.S. Department of Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy EERE Home | Programs & Offices | Consumer Information Federal Energy Management Program Search...

442

Federal Energy Management Program: 2003 Federal Energy and Water...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Skip to Content U.S. Department of Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy EERE Home | Programs & Offices | Consumer Information Federal Energy Management Program Search...

443

Federal Energy Management Program: 2012 Federal Energy and Water...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Skip to Content U.S. Department of Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy EERE Home | Programs & Offices | Consumer Information Federal Energy Management Program Search...

444

Federal Energy Management Program: 2009 Federal Energy and Water...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Skip to Content U.S. Department of Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy EERE Home | Programs & Offices | Consumer Information Federal Energy Management Program Search...

445

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements and Acquisitio...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal purchasers may assume that ENERGY STAR-qualified products and products meeting FEMP-designated efficiency requirements are life-cycle cost effective. However, users...

446

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products Federal agencies must purchase ENERGY STAR-qualified products or FEMP-designated product categories where such categories have been...

447

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainabl...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

the EPAct of 1992. Also see Water Efficiency Federal Requirements. Back to Top Energy Use Intensity Energy use intensity requirements for sustainable buildings include: Ensuring...

448

Finding of No Significant Impact for Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Central Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps (01/01)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

01 01 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 14 / Monday, January 22, 2001 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Finding of No Significant Impact Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for Energy Conservation Standard for Residential Central Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps. SUMMARY: The Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended by the National Energy Conservation Policy Act and the National Appliance Energy Conservation Act, and the National Appliance Energy Conservation Amendments, prescribes energy conservation standards for certain major household appliances, and requires the Department of Energy (DOE) to administer an energy conservation program for these products. Based on an

449

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 232: Area 25 Sewage Lagoons, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 232, Area 25 Sewage Lagoons, has been developed in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order that was agreed to by the U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office; the State of Nevada Division of Environmental Protection; and the U. S. Department of Defense. Corrective Action Unit 232 consists of Corrective Action Site 25-03-01, Sewage Lagoon. Corrective Action Unit 232, Area 25 Sewage Lagoons, received sanitary effluent from four buildings within the Test Cell ''C'' Facility from the mid-1960s through approximately 1996. The Test Cell ''C'' Facility was used to develop nuclear propulsion technology by conducting nuclear test reactor studies. Based on the site history collected to support the Data Quality Objectives process, contaminants of potential concern include volatile organic compounds, semivolatile organic compounds, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act metals, petroleum hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyls, pesticides, herbicides, gamma emitting radionuclides, isotopic plutonium, isotopic uranium, and strontium-90. A detailed conceptual site model is presented in Section 3.0 and Appendix A of this Corrective Action Investigation Plan. The conceptual model serves as the basis for the sampling strategy. Under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, the Corrective Action Investigation Plan will be submitted to the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for approval. Field work will be conducted following approval of the plan. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of corrective action alternatives in the Corrective Action Decision Document.

USDOE /NV

1999-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

450

Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 204: Storage Bunkers, Nevada Test Site, Nevada: Revision 0, Including Errata Sheet  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document identifies the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office's corrective action alternative recommendation for each of the corrective action sites (CASs) within Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 204: Storage Bunkers, Nevada Test Site (NTS), Nevada, under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. An evaluation of analytical data from the corrective action investigation, review of current and future operations at each CAS, and a detailed comparative analysis of potential corrective action alternatives were used to determine the appropriate corrective action for each CAS. There are six CASs in CAU 204, which are all located between Areas 1, 2, 3, and 5 on the NTS. The No Further Action alternative was recommended for CASs 01-34-01, 02-34-01, 03-34-01, and 05-99-02; and a Closure in Place with Administrative Controls recommendation was the preferred corrective action for CASs 05-18-02 and 05-33-01. These alternatives were judged to meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated as well as applicable state and federal regulations for closure of the sites and will eliminate potential future exposure pathways to the contaminated media at CAU 204.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office

2004-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

451

Executive Order 13212 - Actions To Expedite Energy-Related Projects:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Executive Order 13212 - Actions To Expedite Energy-Related Executive Order 13212 - Actions To Expedite Energy-Related Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 66, No. 99 - May 18, 2001 Executive Order 13212 - Actions To Expedite Energy-Related Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 66, No. 99 - May 18, 2001 The increased production and transmission of energy in a safe and environmentally sound manner is essential to the well-being of the American people. In general, it is the policy of this Administration that executive departments and agencies (agencies) shall take appropriate actions, to the extent consistent with applicable law, to expedite projects that will increase the production, transmission, or conservation of energy. Executive Order 13212: 66 FR 28357 (22 May 2001) More Documents & Publications

452

Federal Regulations | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Regulations Federal Regulations Federal Regulations NOTE: Adobe Acrobat Reader may be necessary to view PDF documents listed below. Accessibility Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act - Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility Standards Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act - Nondiscrimination Under Federal Grants and Programs Federal Records Act Freedom of Information Act (as amended) Freedom of Information Act Updates Privacy Act of 1974 (as amended) Privacy Act Overview Cyber Security Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (PDF) Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986 (PDF) Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 Federal Information Security Management of 2002 ( Title III of E-Gov) Homeland Security Act of 2002 ( includes Cyber Security Act of 2002 and Critical Infrastructure Act of 2002)

453

February 2013 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Standards Actions Technical Standards Program Newsletter U . S . D E PA R T M E N T O F O ffi ce O f nuclear SaFety ENERGY inSide thiS iSSue * Featured DOE Technical Standards Activities * DOE Technical Standards Cost- Savings and Access Improvement Initiative * Domestic and International Nuclear Energy Voluntary Consensus Standards Needs * Nuclear Safety- Related Standards Activity Featured dOe technical StandardS activitieS DOE Technical Standards Cost-Savings and Access Improvement Initiative By Helen Todosow, Brookhaven National Laboratory The Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards Managers (TSM) are actively exploring ways to save the government and tax payers' money while at the same time significantly improving efficiencies in access and use of voluntary consensus

454

Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 March 2002 FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT TRANSURANIC WASTE RETRIEVAL FROM THE 218-W-4B AND 218-W-4C LOW-LEVEL BURIAL GROUNDS HANFORD SITE, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY March 2002 U.S. Department of Energy Finding of No Significant Impact 2 March 2002 This page intentionally left blank. U.S. Department of Energy Finding of No Significant Impact 3 March 2002 AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA), DOE/EA-1405, for retrieval of transuranic waste from the 218-W-4B and 218-W-4C low-level burial grounds located in the 200 West Area of the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington. Based on the

455

Department of Energy finding of no significant impact, Low Energy Demonstration Accelerator, Los Alamos National Laboratory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

As part of the DOE`s need to maintain the capability of producing tritium in support of its historic and near-term stewardship of the nation`s nuclear weapons stockpile, the agency has recently completed a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Tritium Supply and Recycling. The Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Low Energy Demonstration Accelerator (LEDA) at Technical Area (TA) 53, LANL, Los Alamos, New Mexico (DOE-EA-1147), March 1996, analyzes the DOE proposal to design, build, and test critical prototypical components of the accelerator system for tritium production, specifically the front-end, low-energy section of the accelerator at LANL. LEDA would be incrementally developed and tested in five separate stages over the next seven years. LEDA would be located at an existing building at TA-53; the LEDA components would be tested in order to verify equipment and prototype design and resolve related performance and production issues for future full-scale operation at Savannah River Site (SRS) in the event the APT plant is built. Production operations would not occur at LANL under the proposed action. The US DOE finds that there would be no significant impact from proceeding with its proposal to design, build, and test critical prototypical components of the accelerator system for tritium production, specifically the front-end, low-energy section of the accelerator, at TA-53, LANL. Based on the environmental assessment that analyses the potential environmental effects that would be expected to occur if the DOE were to design, build, and test prototypical components of the accelerator system for tritium production, the proposed action does not constitute a major federal action which would significantly affect the human environment within the meaning of NEPA. Therefore, no environmental impact statement is required for this proposal.

NONE

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

456

Preventive Action Number:  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7 Corrective Action Report Planning Worksheet 11_0414 1 of 3 7 Corrective Action Report Planning Worksheet 11_0414 1 of 3 EOTA - Business Form Document Title: Corrective Action Report Planning Worksheet Document Number: F-017 Rev 11_0414 Document Owner: Elizabeth Sousa Backup Owner: Melissa Otero Approver(s): Melissa Otero Parent Document: P-008, Corrective/Preventive Action Notify of Changes: EOTA Employees Referenced Document(s): N/A F-017 Corrective Action Report Planning Worksheet 11_0414 2 of 3 Revision History: Rev. Description of Change 08_0613 Initial Release 11_0414 Added problem statement to first block. F-017 Corrective Action Report Planning Worksheet 11_0414 3 of 3 Corrective Action Report Planning Worksheet Corrective Action Number: Source: Details/Problem Statement: Raised By: Raised Date: Target Date:

457

2010 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey Page 1 of 20 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Department of Energy 2010 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey: Trend Report (2006 and 2008 results have been recalculated to exclude Do Not Know/No Basis to Judge responses) Response Summary Surveys Completed 2010 Governmentwide 263,475 2010 Department of Energy 6,648 2008 Department of Energy 6,093 2006 Department of Energy 7,742 This 2010 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey Report provides summary results for your department or agency. The results include Positive, Neutral, and Negative response percentages for each survey item. For each of the

458

Federal Buildings Supplemental Survey 1993  

SciTech Connect

The Energy Information Administration (EIA) of the US Department of Energy (DOE) is mandated by Congress to be the agency that collects, analyzes, and disseminates impartial, comprehensive data about energy including the volume consumed, its customers, and the purposes for which it is used. The Federal Buildings Supplemental Survey (FBSS) was conducted by EIA in conjunction with DOE`s Office of Federal Energy Management Programs (OFEMP) to gain a better understanding of how Federal buildings use energy. This report presents the data from 881 completed telephone interviews with Federal buildings in three Federal regions. These buildings were systematically selected using OFEMP`s specifications; therefore, these data do not statistically represent all Federal buildings in the country. The purpose of the FBSS was threefold: (1) to understand the characteristics of Federal buildings and their energy use; (2) to provide a baseline in these three Federal regions to measure future energy use in Federal buildings as required in EPACT; and (3) to compare building characteristics and energy use with the data collected in the CBECS.

NONE

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

459

Federal Communications Commission Cyber Security ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Chief Information Officer for 25 Years ... the United Nations Under Secretary General and CIO ... after he hacked into a federal investigation database. ...

2011-11-15T23:59:59.000Z

460

Federal Energy Management Program: Glossary  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Below is an alphabetized list of commonly used terminology associated with energy management in the federal sector. Terms are organized by category: Building Standards...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "federal action significantly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Federal Energy Management Program: Publications  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

that about 10% of this is used to heat Details Bookmark & Share View Related Federal Energy Management Program Overview - Facilitating Sound, Cost-Effective Energy Management...

462

Federal Energy Management Program: Services  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

facilitate the Federal Government's implementation of sound, cost-effective energy management and investment practices to enhance the nation's energy security and...

463

Federal Energy Management Program: Training  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

reduce greenhouse gas emissions and petroleum consumption while increasing alternative fuel use and fleet fuel efficiency. On Demand 90 minutes Federal Greenhouse Gas Accounting...

464

Federal Energy Management Program: News  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

buildings, boost efficiency standards for appliances and federal buildings, and develop fuel economy standards for heavy-duty vehicles. More July 3, 2013 EPA Strengthens Energy...