Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fayette gillespie llano" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Fayette Fayette County, Pennsylvania to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on Delicious Rank Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on Digg Find More places to share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on AddThis.com... Better Buildings Residential Network Progress Stories Interviews Videos Events Quick Links to Partner Information AL | AZ | CA | CO | CT FL | GA | IL | IN | LA ME | MD | MA | MI | MO

2

Fayette, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

| Sign Up Search Page Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon Fayette, Utah: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates...

3

Coweta-Fayette EMC- Home Plus Loan Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Coweta-Fayette Electric Membership Corporation (EMC) provides electric and natural gas service to 58,000 customers in Georgia's Coweta, Fayette, Meriwether, Heard, Troop and Fulton counties....

4

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County Training Makes All  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Fayette County Fayette County Training Makes All the Difference for Pennsylvania Business Owner to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County Training Makes All the Difference for Pennsylvania Business Owner on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County Training Makes All the Difference for Pennsylvania Business Owner on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County Training Makes All the Difference for Pennsylvania Business Owner on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County Training Makes All the Difference for Pennsylvania Business Owner on Delicious Rank Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County Training Makes All the Difference for Pennsylvania Business Owner on Digg

5

Coweta-Fayette EMC - Residential Solar Water Heater Rebate Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Coweta-Fayette EMC - Residential Solar Water Heater Rebate Program Coweta-Fayette EMC - Residential Solar Water Heater Rebate Program (Georgia) Coweta-Fayette EMC - Residential Solar Water Heater Rebate Program (Georgia) < Back Eligibility Residential Savings Category Heating & Cooling Solar Water Heating Program Info State Georgia Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount Existing Homes Solar Water Heater: $750 New Homes Solar Water Heater: $1,250 - $1,500 Provider Coweta-Fayette Electric Membership Corporation Coweta-Fayette Electric Membership Corporation (EMC) provides electric and natural gas service to 58,000 customers in Georgia's Coweta, Fayette, Meriwether, Heard, Troop and Fulton counties. Currently, Coweta-Fayette EMC offers rebates on solar water heaters from $750 up to $1,500 as part of the Touchstone Energy Home Program. Solar

6

Coweta-Fayette EMC- Residential Solar Water Heater Rebate Program (Georgia)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Coweta-Fayette Electric Membership Corporation (EMC) provides electric and natural gas service to 58,000 customers in Georgia's Coweta, Fayette, Meriwether, Heard, Troop and Fulton counties.

7

Coweta-Fayette EMC - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Coweta-Fayette EMC - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program Coweta-Fayette EMC - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program Coweta-Fayette EMC - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program < Back Eligibility Residential Savings Category Home Weatherization Commercial Weatherization Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Heat Pumps Appliances & Electronics Water Heating Windows, Doors, & Skylights Maximum Rebate Double-Pane/Storm Windows: $500 Programmable Thermostat: $50 per home Program Info State Georgia Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount Existing Homes Electric Heat Pumps: $150 - $300 Dual Fuel Heat Pumps: $200 Geothermal Heat Pumps: $1000 Water Heaters: $250 Attic Insulation: $90 - $150 Floor Insulation: $150 Double-Pane/Storm Windows: $50/window Programmable Thermostat: $25/unit

8

Coweta-Fayette El Member Corp | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Coweta-Fayette El Member Corp Coweta-Fayette El Member Corp Jump to: navigation, search Name Coweta-Fayette El Member Corp Place Georgia Utility Id 4432 Utility Location Yes Ownership C NERC Location SERC NERC SERC Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Additional Residential Meter Option Residential Electric Heat Rates Residential Large Commercial Commercial Large Commercial* Commercial Outdoor Lighting Town and Country 100 W Lighting Outdoor Lighting Traditionaire 150 W Lighting Residential Residential Residential Time-Of-Use Residential Small Commercial Commercial

9

City of Llano, Texas (Utility Company) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Llano, Texas (Utility Company) Llano, Texas (Utility Company) Jump to: navigation, search Name City of Llano Place Texas Utility Id 11103 Utility Location Yes Ownership M NERC Location TRE NERC ERCOT Yes ISO Other Yes Activity Transmission Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Large Commercial Commercial Residential service Residential Small Commercial Commercial Average Rates Residential: $0.1090/kWh Commercial: $0.1120/kWh References ↑ "EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a" Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=City_of_Llano,_Texas_(Utility_Company)&oldid=409871

10

2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - LaFayette High School | U.S.  

Office of Science (SC) Website

LaFayette High School LaFayette High School National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About National Science Bowl Contacts Regional Science Bowl Coordinators National Science Bowl FAQ's Alumni Past National Science Bowl Winners Past National Science Bowl Photos National Science Bowl Logos High School Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov 2010 National Science Bowl Photos 2010 DOE National Science Bowl® Photos - LaFayette High School Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The LaFayette High School team tours the National Mall in Washington, DC on

11

The APO 3.5-meter remote observing program--2002 and beyond Bruce Gillespie*  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The APO 3.5-meter remote observing program--2002 and beyond Bruce Gillespie* Site Operations Manager, Apache Point Observatory ABSTRACT The Apache Point Observatory 3.5-meter telescope is a working operational models. Keywords: Astrophysical Research Consortium, Apache Point Observatory, 3.5-meter telescope

Castillo, Steven P.

12

Llano County, Texas: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Llano County, Texas: Energy Resources Llano County, Texas: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 30.692528°, -98.7481167° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":30.692528,"lon":-98.7481167,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

13

Llano Estacado Wind Ranch at Texico | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Texico Texico Jump to: navigation, search Name Llano Estacado Wind Ranch at Texico Facility Llano Estacado Wind Ranch at Texico Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner Cielo Wind Power Developer Cielo Wind Power- RES Energy Purchaser Xcel Energy Location Curry County NM Coordinates 34.6283°, -103.387° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":34.6283,"lon":-103.387,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

14

Llano Estacado Wind Ranch at White Deer | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Estacado Wind Ranch at White Deer Estacado Wind Ranch at White Deer Jump to: navigation, search Name Llano Estacado Wind Ranch at White Deer Facility Llano Estacado Wind Ranch at White Deer Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner Shell Wind Energy Developer Cielo Wind Power Energy Purchaser Xcel Energy Location White Deer TX Coordinates 35.4613°, -101.238° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":35.4613,"lon":-101.238,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

15

Seismic reprocessing, interpretation and petroleum prospectivity of the East Cano Rondon Area, Llanos Basin, Colombia  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The Llanos Basin, in Eastern Colombia, is the major oil-producing province in the country. In recent years, exploration in this basin has been focused towards plays in the Llanos foothills, where proven thrust traps present the possibility of large discoveries. However, the Llanos foreland still remains an attractive exploration target due to lower risk plays linked to proven production mechanisms. One giant field and over 51 smaller fields have been discovered. The basin, with an exploration well density of 1:500 1=2, can hardly be considered mature. Improvements in seismic data processing, sequence stratigraphic analysis and a better understanding of the petroleum systems have led to a renewed interest in the Llanos foreland in an attempt to identify new plays and prospects. An integrated geophysical and geological study was done to evaluate the petroleum prospectivity of the East Cano Rondon Area, located 35-km southwest of the giant Cano Limon Field. The purpose of the project was to reprocess approximately 200 km of mid 1980s seismic, integrate the interpretation of the seismic data with the available well and geologic data, create a sequence stratigraphic framework and describe the hydrocarbon potential of the area. Reprocessing the seismic data gave an improved image of the subsurface from previous processing. The implementations of techniques like refraction statics, pre-stack linear noise attenuation (FK Filter), surface consistent residual statics, dip moveout (DMO), post stack signal enhancement (FK Weighting) and finite difference migration improved the static solutions, signal noise to ratio and imaging of the fault planes. The interpretation of the seismic data led to the dentition of the structural styles, deformation history, paleotopography and identification of seismic facies. The sequence stratigraphic framework was built from the integration of the seismic, well and regional data. 5 transgressive-regressive sequences were identified in the Upper Cretaceous to Early Oligocene rocks. Two prospective areas were identified within the East Cano Rondon Area. One of them is related to the proven play of fault bounded anticlinal structures. Three gelds in the vicinity of the study area have proven reserves in this play. The second prospect is based on a new play that is being proposed. The play involves the stratigraphic pinchout of basal transgressive sands deposited in the topographic lows created by wrench fault tectonics. The two prospects could have up to an estimated 759 MMBO.

Molina, German D

1999-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

16

Llano Estacado Wind Ranch at Texico phase II | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Estacado Wind Ranch at Texico phase II Estacado Wind Ranch at Texico phase II Jump to: navigation, search Name Llano Estacado Wind Ranch at Texico phase II Facility Llano Estacado Wind Ranch at Texico phase II Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner Cielo Wind Power Developer Cielo Wind Power Energy Purchaser Xcel Energy Location Curry County NM Coordinates 34.6283°, -103.387° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":34.6283,"lon":-103.387,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

17

Mineralogy and Geochemistry of Soils of Ultramafic Origin from the Great Dyke, Zimbabwe and Gillespie County, Texas  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Although soils developed from ultramafic parent materials have significance to agriculture, ecology and health, their bio-geochemistry is poorly understood. The mineralogical and bio-geochemistry of soils formed from the ultramafic parent materials of the Great Dyke, Zimbabwe and Gillespie County, Texas was investigated. The objectives were to determine the mineralogical and bio-geochemical properties of the soils in order to assess the potential impact and challenges to agriculture, and environmental quality. Soil samples were taken from the crest, shoulder, footslope and the toeslope. Chemical analyses were performed by nuclear and spectroscopic techniques. Mineral characterization was conducted by x-ray diffraction (XRD) and spectroscopic techniques. Microbial whole-community structure was determined by the fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) technique. The results indicate wide chemical and mineralogical compositions among the studied sites. The soils contain relatively high concentrations of heavy metals (some sites contain Cr(VI)), but low levels of K and Ca. The highest concentrations of trace metal were associated with chromite, Fe oxides and serpentinite. The concentrations of Mg were higher than those of Ca and varied between Zimbabwe and Texas soils largely due to the parent materials. Unique to these soils is the occurrence of talc, serpentine, chlorite, Fe-rich smectite, amphiboles, pyroxenes, Fe and Cr oxides in relatively large amounts. These soils also lack micas and have neglible amounts of kaolinite and feldspars. Palygorskite and serpentine occurred in specific soil horizons and at specific landscape positions. FAME profiles indicate that the soil microbial community structure is predominantly bacteria and fungi (including arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi) at each landscape position across the transect. Biomarkers for actinomycetes were undetectable. The proportions of Gram-positive bacteria were higher than those of the Gram-negative bacteria. Very low levels of nutrients (Ca and K), higher Mg/Ca molar ratios, and the relatively high concentrations of heavy metals in these soils impact agricultural productivity. High concentrations of heavy metals, the presence of the Cr(VI) as well as its great potential to form in these soils might impact microbial activity and environmental quality. The occurrence of fibrous minerals (e.g serpentine and amphiboles) in these soils will likely impact human health.

Bangira, Courage

2010-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

18

Fayette, Ohio: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Ohio: Energy Resources Ohio: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 41.6733839°, -84.3268925° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":41.6733839,"lon":-84.3268925,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

19

Fayette County, Kentucky: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

°, -84.4802606° °, -84.4802606° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":38.0606478,"lon":-84.4802606,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

20

Fayette County, Iowa: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

°, -91.9099238° °, -91.9099238° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":42.9258199,"lon":-91.9099238,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fayette gillespie llano" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Fayette County, West Virginia: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

81.0754657° 81.0754657° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":38.0615913,"lon":-81.0754657,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

22

Fayette County, Pennsylvania: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

9.6502105° 9.6502105° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":39.9272324,"lon":-79.6502105,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

23

Fayette County, Tennessee: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

27°, -89.4742177° 27°, -89.4742177° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":35.1257427,"lon":-89.4742177,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

24

Fayette County, Ohio: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

3.4643551° 3.4643551° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":39.5919809,"lon":-83.4643551,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

25

Fayette County, Georgia: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

°, -84.4802606° °, -84.4802606° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":33.4502206,"lon":-84.4802606,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

26

Fayette County, Indiana: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

85.1479364° 85.1479364° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":39.5920377,"lon":-85.1479364,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

27

Fayette County, Texas: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

2°, -96.8350999° 2°, -96.8350999° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":29.8896442,"lon":-96.8350999,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

28

Fayette County, Alabama: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

63333° 63333° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":33.6871392,"lon":-87.7763333,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

29

Fayette County, Illinois: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

669568°, -89.0179332° 669568°, -89.0179332° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":39.0669568,"lon":-89.0179332,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

30

Coweta-Fayette EMC - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Technologies Building Insulation, Heat pumps, Programmable Thermostats, Water Heaters, Windows, Geothermal Heat Pumps Active Incentive Yes Implementing Sector Utility Energy...

31

Better Buildings: Workforce: Spotlight on Fayette County, Pennsylvania...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

a BPI certified technician to perform a home energy assessment in order for the homeowner to qualify for an energy efficiency upgrade rebate. To achieve the program's goals,...

32

2010 DOE National Science Bowl Photos - LaFayette High School...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Facebook Facebook External link Share with Twitter Twitter External link Share with Google Bookkmarks Google Bookmarks External link Email a Friend Email link to: send 2010 DOE...

33

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

nstant-lighting-discounts-program-illinois Rebate Coweta-Fayette EMC- Residential Solar Water Heater Rebate Program (Georgia) Coweta-Fayette Electric Membership Corporation (EMC)...

34

Tax Credits, Rebates & Savings | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Coweta-Fayette EMC - Residential Solar Water Heater Rebate Program (Georgia) Georgia Residential Heating & Cooling Solar Water Heating Coweta-Fayette Electric Membership...

35

Tax Credits, Rebates & Savings | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Heat Pumps Appliances & Electronics Water Heating Windows, Doors, & Skylights Coweta-Fayette Electric Membership Corporation Coweta-Fayette EMC...

36

Furnace Systems Technology Workshop  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

TMS Networking and Online Tools, X ... TMS Social Network and Site Tools .... furnace technology, fundamentals of fans and blowers, reduction of melt loss, refractory ... Sutton - Harbison-Walker Refractories; Jon Gillespie - Gillespie & Powers...

37

NIST: Freq. Observ. Interstellar Molec. Micro. Trans. - Table 3  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Experiment Max-Planck-Institut fr Radioastronomie European Southern Observatory Onsala Space Observatory Llano de Chanjnantor, Chile. ...

38

NETL F 451.1/1-1, Categorical Exclusion Designation Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lexington, Fayette County, Kentucky Solid-Fueled Pressurized Chemical Looping with Flue-Gas Turbine Combined Cycle for Improved Plant... Validation of the Solid-Fueled...

39

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Step 5b: Help Program...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

the Necessary Equipment Reducing the Equipment Cost Barrier To help local contractors enter the program more quickly and offset start-up expenses, the Fayette County Better...

40

NETL F 451.1/1-1, Categorical Exclusion Designation Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5113 - 43016 Nicholas D'Amico Lexington, Fayette County, Kentucky Low Temperature NOx Storage and Reduction Using Engineered Materials Work at the U. of Kentucky will focus...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fayette gillespie llano" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

NETL F 451.1-1/1 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Designation Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DE-FE0000699 University of Kentucky FE DE-FE0000699 315 10 Donald Krastman 5110 -10112 Lexington, Fayette County, KY COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS (CFD) ANALYSIS DENSITY...

42

NETL F 451.1-1/1 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Designation Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FE0000699 University of Kentucky FE 315 10 Donald Krastman 5110 -10112 Lexington, Fayette County, KY CHEMICAL STABILIZATION OF FINE COAL WASTE: ELIMINATION OF SLURRY...

43

Investigation into Utrafast Dynamics of Organometallic Compounds with Transient Resonance Infrared Spectroscopy and Growing String  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

M. ; Zewail, A. H. , Angewandte Chemie-International EditionA. ; Ugi, I. , Angewandte Chemie-International Edition 1971,Gillespi.P, Angewandte Chemie-International Edition 1970,

Schlegel, Jacob Peter

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

44

Publications  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

In 2006 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. Asilomar, California, USA, 2006. Haves, Philip, Robert J. Hitchcock, Kenneth L. Gillespie, Martha Brook,...

45

Argonne supports solar energy planning in Southwest | Argonne...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

surrounding regions. They used Google Earth to create this visualization of the Gillespie Solar Energy Zone in Arizona (shown in orange tint), with a power tower wireframe model,...

46

Designing Arithmetic Digital Circuits via Rewriting-Logic Mauricio Ayala-Rincon  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

@unb.br. ¶Departamento de Engenharia Mec^anica, Universidade de Bras´ilia, Bras´ilia D.F., Brasil. llanos

Hartenstein, Reiner

47

GLADY CASSIT Y VANDALIA MURPHY CR EEK BU CKHN-CENT URY CLAY  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

OWN OAKFORD TWENTY-MILE CR EEK CARMICH AELS GOULD KAN ZIGG H ILL CADIZ LEOPOLD MT DAVIS BEARSVILLE AU GU STA FAYETT E C ITY FINK CR EEK HEADSVILLE CAMERON-GARNER TERRA ALTA...

48

Modification date 19 June 2012 18:22:10 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Coweta-Fayette EMC - Home Plus Loan Program (Georgia) + (19 June 2012 20:12:34) GIZ-Thailand-National energy efficiency plan as a core element for an activity- and evidence-based...

49

NETL F 451.1-1/1 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Designation Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FE0000699 University of Kentucky FE DE-FE0000699 315 10 Donald Krastman 5110 -10112 Lexington, Fayette County, KY BENEFICIATION OF FINE SIZE POWDER RIVER BASIN COAL Evaluate a...

50

NETL F 451.1-1/1 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Designation Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DE-FE0000699 University of Kentucky FE DE-FE0000699 315 10 Donald Krastman 5110 -10112 Lexington, Fayette County, KY Dewatering of Fine Coal Pellets Demonstrating the...

51

NETL F 451.1-1/1 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Designation Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FE0000699 University of Kentucky FE DE-FE0000699 315 10 Donald Krastman 5110 -10112 Lexington, Fayette County, KY DEVELOPMENT OF STRATEGIES TO MINIMIZE THE RELEASE OF TOXIC...

52

Stochastic Dynamics of Molecules on Networks Objective: To give a presentation of about 60 minutes at the end of the week covering the key aspects of stochastic  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of Latent Chemical Species: Applications to Inferr Gillespie (2007) Stochastic Simulation of Chemical process modelling of latent chemical species: applications to inferring transcription factor activities the last decade? 5. What is ahead? Recommended literature Arkin et al. (1998) Stochastic Kinetic Analysis

Goldschmidt, Christina

53

FA L L 2 0 1 1 1 5 * Alumni + Deceased  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. Gillespie, Jr. '62 Patricia Girke '55 Sarah J. Girotti '93 ++ Bernard Gitlin '62 '89P '92P ++ Bruce J Jacalyn `78 and Andrew Aaron '09P Robert J. Abadessa '73 ++ Ann and Richard L. Abbrecht, Jr. '06P ++ James-Grande '03 Jan S. and John F. Adams, Jr. '09P Mark J. Adams '76 ++ Ryan R. Adams '96 Charles E. Ahl, Jr. '40

Memphis, University of

54

CX-003605: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5: Categorical Exclusion Determination 5: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-003605: Categorical Exclusion Determination Competitive Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Awards CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 07/20/2010 Location(s): Fayette County, Pennsylvania Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office Fayette County, Pennsylvania will use the Department of Energy funding under the Competitive Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Award to support an energy efficiency and awareness outreach/marketing campaign, a series of residential and non-residential energy audits (which includes assistance in the identification and handoff to qualified implementation subcontractors) as well as project management, assessment and reporting efforts over the three year life of the project.

55

CX-002038: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

38: Categorical Exclusion Determination 38: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-002038: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program Community Bike Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/20/2010 Location(s): Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office The Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government would use $175,000 in Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant funds to purchase and install equipment associated with a bicycle sharing program throughout downtown Lexington. The proposed bicycle sharing program includes 9 bike stations and 50 bikes at specified locations. Stations would be placed at two major university campuses and several retail areas that are within a short bike-riding distance from downtown. Stations would also be placed along the

56

Data:2588a0d5-6dec-406b-a182-e40a9aebe06a | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

-6dec-406b-a182-e40a9aebe06a -6dec-406b-a182-e40a9aebe06a No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: City of LaFayette, Georgia (Utility Company) Effective date: 2013/04/08 End date if known: Rate name: Residential Service Sector: Residential Description: Source or reference: https://cas.sharepoint.illinoisstate.edu/grants/Sunshot/Lists/DATA%20ENTRY%20Additional%20Information%20Obtained/Attachments/72/City%20of%20LaFayette%20GA%20rates.pdf Source Parent: Comments Applicability Demand (kW) Minimum (kW): Maximum (kW): History (months): Energy (kWh) Minimum (kWh): Maximum (kWh): History (months):

57

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

31 - 24340 of 29,416 results. 31 - 24340 of 29,416 results. Rebate CoServ- Solar Energy Rebate (Texas) '''''NOTE: Available funding for fiscal year 2012 has been exhausted for the CoServ Solar PV Rebate Program.''''' http://energy.gov/savings/coserv-solar-energy-rebate-texas Rebate CoServ Electric Cooperative- Commercial Energy Efficient Lighting Rebate Program CoServ Electric Cooperative provides rebates for commercial and industrial customers who upgrade to high efficiency lighting for the workplace. A rebate of $0.30/watt saved is available on custom... http://energy.gov/savings/coserv-electric-cooperative-commercial-energy-efficient-lighting-rebate-program Rebate Coweta-Fayette EMC- Residential Solar Water Heater Rebate Program (Georgia) Coweta-Fayette Electric Membership Corporation (EMC) provides electric and

58

Data:9db2d411-bd2c-432d-9456-bd74299e78a9 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

d411-bd2c-432d-9456-bd74299e78a9 d411-bd2c-432d-9456-bd74299e78a9 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: City of LaFayette, Georgia (Utility Company) Effective date: 2013/04/08 End date if known: Rate name: Large General Service Sector: Commercial Description: Source or reference: https://cas.sharepoint.illinoisstate.edu/grants/Sunshot/Lists/DATA%20ENTRY%20Additional%20Information%20Obtained/Attachments/72/City%20of%20LaFayette%20GA%20rates.pdf Source Parent: Comments Applicability Demand (kW) Minimum (kW): Maximum (kW): History (months): Energy (kWh) Minimum (kWh): Maximum (kWh): History (months):

59

Update on Enhanced Mercury Capture by SO2 Controls  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report describes the interim results of two projects that focus on understanding and enhancing mercury capture by wet gas desulfurization (FGD) systems. The first project is collecting data from bench scale experiments to determine the reactions and kinetics governing the fate of oxidized memory absorbed by wet FGD liquors. The second project is a 200-MW-scale demonstration of a low-temperature mercury oxidation catalyst at Lower Colorado River Authority's (LCRA's) Fayette Power Project.

2008-03-13T23:59:59.000Z

60

Microsoft Word - 13014b.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 Conference, February 24 - 28, 2013, Phoenix, Arizona, USA 3 Conference, February 24 - 28, 2013, Phoenix, Arizona, USA 1 Recent Developments in DOE FUSRAP - 13014 Christopher Clayton*, Vijendra Kothari**, Gwen Hooten***, Ken Starr***, Cheri Bahrke****, Joey Gillespie****, Michael Widdop****, and Bob Darr***** * U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management, Washington, DC Christopher.Clayton@lm.doe.gov ** U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management, Morgantown, West Virginia Vijendra.Kothari@lm.doe.gov *** U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management, Westminster, Colorado Ken.Starr@lm.doe.gov, Gwen.Hooten@lm.doe.gov **** Stoller LMS Team, Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management, Grand Junction, Colorado Cheri.Bahrke@lm.doe.gov, Joey.Gillespie@lm.doe.gov,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fayette gillespie llano" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Turing proposed a mathematical model based on chemical reactions and diffusion of substances throughout the xy-plane, called reaction-diffusion, to study the emergence of patterns from a homogeneous medium [65]. Hammel and Prusinkiewicz used L-systems and reaction-diffusion in a one-dimensional medium to model the formation of sea shell patterns, and in an expanding one-dimensional medium to model heterocyst spacing in the cyanobacterium Anabaena catenula [25]. They considered the formation of these two patterns as a continuous deterministic process neglecting the noise which is inherent to such a process. The approach taken in this work is to stochastically model reaction-diffusion in a spatial, and possibly expanding, linear structure using L-systems. The stochastic simulation method for chemical reaction kinetics which was developed by Gillespie [20] is used to study this model. On the basis of theoretical considerations, the L-system modelling language L+C [31] is extended to include a stochastic rewriting strategy based on Gillespies algorithm.

Mikolaj Cieslak

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

62

SAS Output  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

and Number of Mines by State, County, and Mine Type, 2012" and Number of Mines by State, County, and Mine Type, 2012" "(thousand short tons)" ,"Underground",,"Surface",,"Total" "Coal-Producing","Number of Mines","Production","Number of Mines","Production","Number of Mines","Production" "State and County" "Alabama",8,12570,38,6752,46,19321 " Bibb","-","-",2,119,2,119 " Blount","-","-",2,236,2,236 " Fayette",1,2249,"-","-",1,2249 " Franklin","-","-",2,137,2,137 " Jackson","-","-",3,152,3,152 " Jefferson",3,3589,9,1106,12,4695

63

"1. W A Parish","Coal","NRG Texas Power LLC",3664 "2. South Texas Project","Nuclear","STP Nuclear Operating Co",2560  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Texas" Texas" "1. W A Parish","Coal","NRG Texas Power LLC",3664 "2. South Texas Project","Nuclear","STP Nuclear Operating Co",2560 "3. Martin Lake","Coal","TXU Generation Co LP",2425 "4. Comanche Peak","Nuclear","TXU Generation Co LP",2406 "5. Monticello","Coal","TXU Generation Co LP",1890 "6. Sabine","Gas","Entergy Texas Inc.",1814 "7. Limestone","Coal","NRG Texas Power LLC",1689 "8. Fayette Power Project","Coal","Lower Colorado River Authority",1641 "9. Forney Energy Center","Gas","FPLE Forney LP",1640

64

SAS Output  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Average Sales Price of Coal by State, County, and Number of Mines, 2012" Average Sales Price of Coal by State, County, and Number of Mines, 2012" "Coal-Producing State and County","Number of Mines","Sales","Average Sales Price" ,,"(thousand short tons)","(dollars per short ton)" "Alabama",39,19021,106.57 " Bibb",1,"w","w" " Blount",2,"w","w" " Fayette",1,"w","w" " Franklin",1,"w","w" " Jackson",2,"w","w" " Jefferson",11,4298,146.04 " Marion",1,"w","w" " Tuscaloosa",7,8599,111.55 " Walker",11,2370,81.88

65

Combined cycle and waste heat recovery power systems based on a novel thermodynamic energy cycle utilizing low-temperature heat for power generation  

SciTech Connect

A new thermodynamic energy cycle has been developed, using a multicomponent working agent. Condensation is supplemented with absorption, following expansion in the turbine. Several combined power systems based on this cycle have been designed and cost-estimated. Efficiencies of these new systems are 1.35 to 1.5 times higher than the best Rankine Cycle system, at the same border conditions. Investment cost per unit of power output is about two-thirds of the cost of a comparable Rankine Cycle system. Results make cogeneration economically attractive at current energy prices. The first experimental installation is planned by Fayette Manufacturing Company and Detroit Diesel Allison Division of General Motors.

Kalina, A.I.

1983-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

66

Data:2721ebf0-ef63-4cc2-9eaf-16c1fdd040fb | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

ebf0-ef63-4cc2-9eaf-16c1fdd040fb ebf0-ef63-4cc2-9eaf-16c1fdd040fb No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: City of LaFayette, Georgia (Utility Company) Effective date: 2013/04/08 End date if known: Rate name: Small General Service Sector: Commercial Description: Source or reference: https://cas.sharepoint.illinoisstate.edu/grants/Sunshot/Lists/DATA%20ENTRY%20Additional%20Information%20Obtained/Attachments/72/City%20of%20LaFayette%20GA%20rates.pdf Source Parent: Comments Applicability Demand (kW) Minimum (kW): Maximum (kW): History (months): Energy (kWh) Minimum (kWh): Maximum (kWh): History (months):

67

Data:Dde6ed62-e484-4ffc-a3dc-f6680a6b86c5 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Dde6ed62-e484-4ffc-a3dc-f6680a6b86c5 Dde6ed62-e484-4ffc-a3dc-f6680a6b86c5 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: City of LaFayette, Georgia (Utility Company) Effective date: 2013/04/08 End date if known: Rate name: Economic Development Rate - ED1 Sector: Description: Source or reference: https://cas.sharepoint.illinoisstate.edu/grants/Sunshot/Lists/DATA%20ENTRY%20Additional%20Information%20Obtained/Attachments/72/City%20of%20LaFayette%20GA%20rates.pdf Source Parent: Comments Applicability Demand (kW) Minimum (kW): Maximum (kW): History (months): Energy (kWh) Minimum (kWh): Maximum (kWh): History (months):

68

Microsoft Word - 11319 Final.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Phoenix, AZ Phoenix, AZ Pre-MARSSIM Surveys in a MARSSIM World: Demonstrating How Pre-MARSSIM Radiological Data Demonstrate Protectiveness at Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Sites - 11319 Christopher Clayton*, Vijendra Kothari**, Michael Widdop***, Susan Kamp***, Laura Cummins***, and Joey Gillespie*** *U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management, Washington, DC 20585 **U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505 ***S.M. Stoller Corporation, Grand Junction, Colorado 81503 ABSTRACT The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and other agencies conducted a significant amount of radiological remediation over decades prior to the development and implementation of the Multi-Agency Radiation

69

Step-by-Step Instructions  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Indiana Indiana based upon the simple prescriptive option of the 2012 IECC. It does not provide a guarantee for meeting the IECC. This guide is not designed to reflect the actual energy code, with amendments, if any, adopted in Indiana and does not, therefore, provide a guarantee for meeting the state energy code. For details on the energy code adopted by Indiana, including how it may differ from the IECC, please contact your local building code official. Additional copies of this guide are available on www.reca-codes.com. CLIMATE ZONE 5 Adams Elkhart Jay Noble Tipton Allen Fayette Johnson Owen Union Bartholomew Fountain Kosciusko Parke Vermillion Benton Franklin La Porte Porter Vigo Blackford Fulton Lagrange Pulaski Wabash Boone Grant Lake Putnam Warren

70

Step-by-Step Instructions  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Ohio. The requirements Ohio. The requirements in the 2009 IECC are the same for windows used in new buildings, remodeling & additions to existing buildings, and as replacements of existing windows. Step-by-Step Instructions 1. Using the climate zone map or table, match the jurisdiction to the appropriate IECC climate zone. Use the "IECC Prescriptive Window Energy Efficiency Requirements" (on the back of this sheet) to determine the window performance requirements associated with the climate zone. 2. Construct the home with windows that have area weighted average U-factor and SHGC values less than or equal to the values for the climate zone and meet the code maximum air leakage requirements. IECC CLIMATE ZONE 5 Allen Fayette Lorain Preble Ashland Franklin Lucas Putnam

71

Step-by-Step Instructions  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

West West Virginia based upon the simple prescriptive option of the 2012 IECC. It does not provide a guarantee for meeting the IECC. This guide is not designed to reflect the actual energy code, with amendments, if any, adopted in West Virginia and does not, therefore, provide a guarantee for meeting the state energy code. For details on the energy code adopted by West Virginia, including how it may differ from the IECC, please contact your local building code official. Additional copies of this guide are available on www.reca-codes.com. CLIMATE ZONE 5 Barbour Lewis Raleigh Brooke Marion Randolph Doddridge Marshall Summers Fayette Mineral Taylor Grant Monongalia Tucker Greenbrier Nicholas Upshur Hampshire Ohio Webster Hancock Pendleton Wetzel

72

Data:D59705d8-229b-450b-a477-c2dbdef17ed2 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

705d8-229b-450b-a477-c2dbdef17ed2 705d8-229b-450b-a477-c2dbdef17ed2 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Coweta-Fayette El Member Corp Effective date: End date if known: Rate name: Small Commercial Sector: Commercial Description: Additional Info: Net Metering: Service to an electric consumer under which electric energy generated by the electric consumer from an eligible on-site generation facility and delivered to the local distribution facilities may be used to offset electric energy provide by the electric utility to the electric consumer during the applicable billing period. For additional information contact the EMC's engineering department.

73

Software Helps Kentucky County Gauge Energy Use | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Software Helps Kentucky County Gauge Energy Use Software Helps Kentucky County Gauge Energy Use Software Helps Kentucky County Gauge Energy Use July 27, 2010 - 1:00pm Addthis How does it work? Software tracks energy usage, greenhouse gas levels and analyzes utility bills. County could see savings and cost recoveries of $100,000 to $200,000. Information allows county to make energy usage changes and identify retrofit needs. For county officials conscious of energy efficiency, deciphering complex utility bills and identifying both municipal energy-use trends and potential savings opportunities can be complex without sophisticated software. "We knew we needed a better system," says James Bush, energy manager for Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky. Last month, the county invested $140,000 of a $2.7 million Energy

74

Step-by-Step Instructions  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Iowa based Iowa based upon the simple prescriptive option of the 2012 IECC. It does not provide a guarantee for meeting the IECC. This guide is not designed to reflect the actual energy code, with amendments, if any, adopted in Iowa and does not, therefore, provide a guarantee for meeting the state energy code. For details on the energy code adopted by Iowa, including how it may differ from the IECC, please contact your local building code official. Additional copies of this guide are available on www.reca-codes.com. CLIMATE ZONE 6 Allamakee Clay Hancock Palo Alto Black Hawk Clayton Hardin Plymouth Bremer Delaware Howard Pocahontas Buchanan Dickinson Humboldt Sac Buena Vista Emmet Ida Sioux Butler Fayette Kossuth Webster Calhoun Floyd Lyon Winnebago Cerro Gordo Franklin

75

T OF ENERG Y EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETE~llNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTI\IEN DEPARTI\IEN T OF ENERG Y EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETE~llNATION RECIPIENT:lexington·Fayette Urnan County Govemment PROJECf TITLE: eeCBG Program Community Bike Project Page 1 of2 STATE: KY Funding Opportunity Announc:tment Number Proc:urtmtnt Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE· EEOOOO728.Q0 1 0 Bastd on my rtview of the information c:onc:erning the proposed ac:tion, as NEPA Complianc:e Offic:er (authorized under DOE Order 4SI.tA), I have made the following determination: CX, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: B5.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical

76

O R I G I N A L P A P E R Biolistic  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Biolistic Biolistic transformation of elite genotypes of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) Zachary R. King * Adam L. Bray * Peter R. LaFayette * Wayne A. Parrott Received: 14 July 2013 / Revised: 25 September 2013 / Accepted: 18 October 2013 Ó Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 Abstract Key message With a novel elite genotype, SA37, and an improved transformation protocol, it is now possible to routinely and efficiently engineer switchgrass using biolistic transformation. Abstract Transformation of elite switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) genotypes would facilitate the characterization of genes related to cell wall recalcitrance to saccharification. However, transformation of explants from switchgrass plants has remained difficult. Therefore, the objective of this study was to develop a biolistic transformation protocol for elite genotypes. Three switchgrass genotypes

77

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Pennsylvania | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 20, 2010 July 20, 2010 CX-003605: Categorical Exclusion Determination Competitive Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Awards CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 07/20/2010 Location(s): Fayette County, Pennsylvania Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office July 14, 2010 CX-003121: Categorical Exclusion Determination Next-Generation Low-Cost Reflector CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/14/2010 Location(s): Pennsylvania Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office July 12, 2010 CX-002980: Categorical Exclusion Determination Renewable Energy Certificate Program CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 07/12/2010 Location(s): St. Francis University, Pennsylvania Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

78

 

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

KY Kentucky Total Sum City, County, and SEO Allocations KY Kentucky Total Sum City, County, and SEO Allocations All $ 25,382,500 KY Kentucky State Energy Office $ 10,427,000 KY Bowling Green City $ 585,600 KY Covington City $ 188,500 KY Florence City $ 126,400 KY Frankfort City $ 132,100 KY Henderson City $ 123,100 KY Hopkinsville City $ 143,600 KY Lexington-Fayette City $ 2,753,800 KY Louisville/Jefferson City $ 7,000,400 KY Owensboro City $ 557,200 KY Richmond City $ 145,600 KY Boone County $ 368,100 KY Bullitt County $ 289,900 KY Campbell County $ 351,600 KY Hardin County $ 426,500 KY Kenton County $ 465,200

79

USE OF SLIMHOLE DRILLING TO REDUCE WELL COSTS 30-50%: ARNIM PROSPECT  

SciTech Connect

This report highlights the drilling of two shallow oil wells in Fayette County, Texas. The operator of these two wells was Stanton Mineral Development, Inc. The aim of this project was to successfully complete the two (2) wells, emphasizing tight oversight of the technological aspects, neglect of which are the primary causes of failure in this mature producing region as well as unnecessarily expensive wells. Discussions contained here within are not limited to just the execution of the project itself, but a historical and technical analysis which forms a basis for the decisions made both during drilling and completion. Additionally, there is substantial dialogue covering the financial benefits associated with the findings of this project.

WM. Stanton McDonald; Christopher M. Long

2002-06-13T23:59:59.000Z

80

Extra cogeneration step seen boosting output 20%  

SciTech Connect

Cogenerators can now buy a prototype 6.5 MW, pre-packaged cogeneration system that incorporates an added step to its cycle to reduce fuel use by 21%. Larger, custom-designed systems will be on the market in 1985. Fayette Manufacturing Co. will offer the Kalina Cycle system at a discount price of $8.2 million (1200/kW) until the systems are competitive with conventional units. The system varies from conventional cogeneration systems by adding a distillation step, which permits the use of two fluids for the turbine steam and operates at a higher thermodynamic efficiency, with boiling occuring at high temperature and low pressure. Although theoretically correct, DOE will withhold judgment on the system's efficiency until the first installation is operating.

Burton, P.

1984-10-08T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fayette gillespie llano" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Step-by-Step Instructions  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Kentucky Kentucky based upon the simple prescriptive option of the 2012 IECC. It does not provide a guarantee for meeting the IECC. This guide is not designed to reflect the actual energy code, with amendments, if any, adopted in Kentucky and does not, therefore, provide a guarantee for meeting the state energy code. For details on the energy code adopted by Kentucky, including how it may differ from the IECC, please contact your local building code official. Additional copies of this guide are available on www.reca-codes.com. CLIMATE ZONE 4 Adair Edmonson Knox Nicholas Allen Elliott LaRue Ohio Anderson Estill Laurel Oldham Ballard Fayette Lawrence Owen Barren Fleming Lee Owsley Bath Floyd Leslie Pendleton Bell Franklin Letcher Perry Boone Fulton Lewis Pike

82

EA-1642: Design and Construction of an Early Lead Mini Fischer-Tropsch  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

42: Design and Construction of an Early Lead Mini 42: Design and Construction of an Early Lead Mini Fischer-Tropsch Refinery at the University of Kentucky Center for Applied Energy Research Near Lexington, Kentucky EA-1642: Design and Construction of an Early Lead Mini Fischer-Tropsch Refinery at the University of Kentucky Center for Applied Energy Research Near Lexington, Kentucky SUMMARY DOE's National Energy Technology Laboratory prepared this environmental assessment to analyze the potential environmental impacts of providing funding for the proposed Early Lead Mini Fischer-Tropsch Refinery. The early lead facility would be located at the University of Kentucky Center for Applied Energy Research in Fayette County Kentucky. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD

83

Data:1a79e18a-cd6c-473c-9851-80eefe8e60e5 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

e18a-cd6c-473c-9851-80eefe8e60e5 e18a-cd6c-473c-9851-80eefe8e60e5 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Coweta-Fayette El Member Corp Effective date: 2007/04/01 End date if known: Rate name: Electric Heat Rates Sector: Residential Description: Additional Info: Net Metering: Service to an electric consumer under which electric energy generated by the electric consumer from an eligible on-site generation facility and delivered to the local distribution facilities may be used to offset electric energy provide by the electric utility to the electric consumer during the applicable billing period. For additional information contact the EMC's engineering department.

84

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: A11 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

21, 2010 21, 2010 CX-003190: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cherokee Nation Businesses CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.1 Date: 07/21/2010 Location(s): Kay County, Oklahoma Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy July 20, 2010 CX-003605: Categorical Exclusion Determination Competitive Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Awards CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 07/20/2010 Location(s): Fayette County, Pennsylvania Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office July 20, 2010 CX-003603: Categorical Exclusion Determination Competitive Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Awards - Oregon Coast Regional Transit Program CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 07/20/2010 Location(s): Columbia County, Oregon Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

85

Microsoft Word - 2006 Final CNTA Field Data Report.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

NV/13609-49 NV/13609-49 Hydrologic Data and Evaluation for Wells Near the Faultless Underground Nuclear Test, Central Nevada Test Area Prepared by Brad Lyles, Phil Oberlander, David Gillespie, Dee Donithan, and Jenny Chapman submitted to Nevada Site Office National Nuclear Security Administration U.S. Department of Energy Las Vegas, Nevada May 2006 Publication No. 45219 Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors. Available for sale to the public from: U.S. Department of Commerce

86

Recent Developments in DOE FUSRAP | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Recent Developments in DOE FUSRAP Recent Developments in DOE FUSRAP Recent Developments in DOE FUSRAP Paper presented at the Waste Management 2013 Conference. February 24 through 28, 2013, Phoenix, Arizona. Christopher Clayton, Vijendra Kothari, Gwen Hooten, Ken Starr, U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management Cheri Bahrke, Joey Gillespie, Michael Widdop, and Bob Darr, S.M. Stoller Corporation, Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management 13014b.pdf More Documents & Publications Overview of the U.S. Department of Energy Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Overview of the U.S. Department of Energy Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Implementation of the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program: Coordination Between the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Army Corps

87

Ambient Control Systems | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Control Systems Control Systems Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Ambient Control Systems Name Ambient Control Systems Address 1810 Gillespie Way Place El Cajon, California Zip 92020 Sector Solar Product Solar energy device with a computerized energy management Website http://www.ambientalert.com/ma Coordinates 32.8193566°, -116.981232° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":32.8193566,"lon":-116.981232,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

88

Overview of the U.S. Department of Energy Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Overview of the U.S. Department of Energy Formerly Utilized Sites Overview of the U.S. Department of Energy Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Overview of the U.S. Department of Energy Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Paper presented at the Waste Management 2012 Conference. February 26 through March 1, 2012, Phoenix, Arizona. Christopher Clayton, Vijendra Kothari, and Ken Starr, U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management Joey Gillespie and Michael Widdop, S.M. Stoller Corporation, Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management 12189a.pdf More Documents & Publications Overview of the U.S. Department of Energy Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Recent Developments in DOE FUSRAP Evaluation of Final Radiological Conditions at Areas of the Niagara Falls

89

NREL: News Feature - Light Inspires Energy Efficient Building Design  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Light Inspires Energy Efficient Building Design Light Inspires Energy Efficient Building Design March 1, 2010 Photo of a man and a woman in a lab holding a window with tinted glass. Enlarge image NREL Researchers Dane Gillespie and Erin Whitney will get to see the windows they normally test in the lab used in a real world environment at the RSF. Credit: Pat Corkery Artists find inspiration in many ways. But for the artists (architects and researchers) working collaboratively to create the most energy efficient office space in the U.S., the inspiration was simply light. In fact, light and the access to light turned out to be a top factor when designing the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Research Support Facility (RSF) located on NREL's South Table Mountain Campus near Golden, Colo. "One of the most powerful drivers in the project is daylight," Philip

90

Coarse-graining stochastic biochemical networks: quasi-stationary approximation and fast simulations using a stochastic path integral technique  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We propose a universal approach for analysis and fast simulations of stiff stochastic biochemical kinetics networks, which rests on elimination of fast chemical species without a loss of information about mesoscopic, non-Poissonian fluctuations of the slow ones. Our approach, which is similar to the Born-Oppenheimer approximation in quantum mechanics, follows from the stochastic path integral representation of the full counting statistics of reaction events (also known as the cumulant generating function). In applications with a small number of chemical reactions, this approach produces analytical expressions for moments of chemical fluxes between slow variables. This allows for a low-dimensional, interpretable representation of the biochemical system, that can be used for coarse-grained numerical simulation schemes with a small computational complexity and yet high accuracy. As an example, we consider a chain of biochemical reactions, derive its coarse-grained description, and show that the Gillespie simulat...

Sinitsyn, N A; Nemenman, Ilya

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

91

An Efficient Finite Difference Method for Parameter Sensitivities of Continuous Time Markov Chains  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We present an efficient finite difference method for the computation of parameter sensitivities for a wide class of continuous time Markov chains. The motivating class of models, and the source of our examples, are the stochastic chemical kinetic models commonly used in the biosciences, though other natural application areas include population processes and queuing networks. The method is essentially derived by making effective use of the random time change representation of Kurtz, and is no harder to implement than any standard continuous time Markov chain algorithm, such as "Gillespie's algorithm" or the next reaction method. Further, the method is analytically tractable, and, for a given number of realizations of the stochastic process, produces an estimator with substantially lower variance than that obtained using other common methods. Therefore, the computational complexity required to solve a given problem is lowered greatly. In this work, we present the method together with the theoretical analysis de...

Anderson, David F

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

92

Findings of No Significant Impact (FONSI) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 25, 2011 February 25, 2011 EA-1700: Finding of No Significant Impact Computational Research and Theory Facility Project, Alameda County, California February 23, 2011 EA-1815: Finding of No Significant Impact Cuyahoga County Agricultural Society Wind Energy Project, Berea, Cuyahoga County, Ohio February 23, 2011 EA-1819: Finding of No Significant Impact Kilowatts for Kenston Wind Energy Project, Chagrin Falls, Geauga County, Ohio February 23, 2011 EA-1816: Finding of No Significant Impact Town of Hempstead Wind to Hydrogen Project, Hempstead, New York February 22, 2011 EA-1796: Finding of No Significant Impact Mesquite Solar Energy Project near Gillespie, Arizona February 18, 2011 EA-1834: Finding of No Significant Impact Proposed Advanced Technologies Vehicles Manufacturing Project, Dearborn,

93

Microsoft Word - WM10 10352 FUSRAP coordination revised.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Implementation of the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program: Coordination Between the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers-10352 Christopher Clayton and Vijendra Kothari U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management Michael Widdop and Joey Gillespie S.M. Stoller Corporation, Grand Junction, CO 81503 ABSTRACT A predecessor agency to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) initiated the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974. In 1997, Congress assigned responsibility for assessment and remediation of FUSRAP sites to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). DOE is responsible for determining eligibility and providing long-term surveillance and maintenance. Successful implementation of FUSRAP is facilitated by the close cooperation

94

New York | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 30, 2012 March 30, 2012 Information Notice -- Champlain Hudson Project, March 30, 2012 Champlain Hudson Power Express Transmission Line Project, New York March 25, 2012 Evaluation of Final Radiological Conditions at Areas of the Niagara Falls Storage Site Remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Paper presented at the Waste Management 2012 Conference. February 26 through March 1, 2012, Phoenix, Arizona. Christopher Clayton, Vijendra Kothari, and Ken Starr, U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management Michael Widdop and Joey Gillespie, S.M. Stoller Corporation, Contractor to the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management March 23, 2012 Brookhaven researchers Etsuko Fujita, Jonathan Hull, and James Muckerman developed a new catalyst that reversibly converts hydrogen gas and carbon dioxide to a liquid under very mild conditions. Their findings were published in the March 18th issue of Nature Chemistry. | Photo courtesy of Brookhaven National Lab.

95

ATTACHMENT FLOODPLAIN STATEMENT OF FINDINGS FOR DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY LOAN GUARANTEE TO SEMPRA GENERATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ATTACHMENT ATTACHMENT FLOODPLAIN STATEMENT OF FINDINGS FOR DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY LOAN GUARANTEE TO SEMPRA GENERATION FOR THE MESQUITE SOLAR ENERGY FACILITY NEAR GILLESPIE, ARIZONA The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has conducted an environmental assessment (EA) that analyzed the reasonably foreseeable environmental impacts associated with the nominal 400 megawatt (MW) photovoltaic solar power project and associated interconnection transmission line proposed by Sempra Generation (Sempra) for the Mesquite Solar Energy Facility (Mesquite) in Maricopa County, Arizona. The proposed project would utilize a photovoltaic (PV) solar panel technology that converts sunlight into direct current (DC) electricity. Inverters convert the DC power to alternating current (AC) power, and the AC power then flows to transformers

96

Most Viewed Documents - Geosciences | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Most Viewed Documents - Geosciences Most Viewed Documents - Geosciences Temperature Profiles and Hydrologic Implications from the Nevada Test Site David Gillespie (2005) 3-D full waveform inversion of seismic data; Part I. Theory Lee, Ki Ha (2003) Drilling and coring methods that minimize the disturbance of cuttings, core, and rock formation in the unsaturated zone, Yucca Mountain, Nevada Hammermeister, D.P.; Blout, D.O.; McDaniel, J.C. (1985) CO{sub 2}-H{sub 2}O mixtures in the geologic sequestration of CO{sub 2}. I. Assessment and calculation of mutual solubilities from 12 to 100 degrees C and up to 600 bar Spycher, Nicolas; Pruess, Karsten; Ennis-King, Jonathan (2002) ADVANCED CHARACTERIZATION OF FRACTURED RESERVOIRS IN CARBONATE ROCKS: THE MICHIGAN BASIN James R. Wood; William B. Harrison (2002)

97

Microsoft Word - WM10 FUSRAP LTSM 10351 Revision.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

The U.S. Department of Energy Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program: Ensuring Protectiveness and Preserving Knowledge-10351 Christopher Clayton, Vijendra Kothari U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management Morgantown, West Virginia; Washington, DC Michael Widdop, Joey Gillespie S.M. Stoller Corporation, Grand Junction, Colorado 81503 ABSTRACT This presentation offers four case studies to illustrate the breadth of long-term surveillance and maintenance (LTS&M) activities required to successfully implement the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management determines eligibility for remediation under FUSRAP and provides LTS&M for remediated sites. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers performs assessments and remediation for

98

Professional Papers | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

About Us » News » Professional Papers About Us » News » Professional Papers Professional Papers March 28, 2013 Recent Developments in DOE FUSRAP Paper presented at the Waste Management 2013 Conference. February 24 through 28, 2013, Phoenix, Arizona. Christopher Clayton, Vijendra Kothari, Gwen Hooten, Ken Starr, U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management Cheri Bahrke, Joey Gillespie, Michael Widdop, and Bob Darr, S.M. Stoller Corporation, Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management March 28, 2012 Overview of the U.S. Department of Energy Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Paper presented at the Waste Management 2012 Conference. February 26 through March 1, 2012, Phoenix, Arizona. Christopher Clayton, Vijendra Kothari, and Ken Starr, U.S. Department of

99

NPP Grassland: Calabozo, Venezuela  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Calabozo, Venezuela, 1969-1987 Calabozo, Venezuela, 1969-1987 [PHOTOGRAPH] Photograph: General view of the Trachypogon savanna at Calabozo (click on the photo to view a series of images from this site). Data Citation Cite this data set as follows: San Jose, J., and R. A. Montés. 1998. NPP Grassland: Calabozo, Venezuela, 1969-1987. Data set. Available on-line [http://www.daac.ornl.gov] from Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, U.S.A. Description Productivity of a humid savanna was determined at the Estacion Biologica de Los Llanos, Calabozo, beginning in 1969. Much of the research work at this site has been carried out by staff from, or in association with, the Ecology Centre of the Venezuelan Institute for Scientific Research (Centro de Ecologia, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Cientificas - IVIC).

100

Electricity Advisory Committee Meeting: Notice of Open Meeting March 10, 2011.  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 Federal Register 7 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 38 / Friday, February 25, 2011 / Notices Eunice Public Library, 1039 10th Street, Eunice, NM 88231, (575) 394-2336. Espan ~ ola Public Library, 313 N Paseo de On ~ ate, Espan ~ ola, NM 87532, (505) 747-6087. Mesa Public Library, 2400 Central Avenue, Los Alamos, NM 87544, (505) 662-8250. Santa Fe Public Library, 145 Washington Street, Santa Fe, NM 87501, (505) 955-6780. Santa Fe Public Library, Oliver La Farge Branch, 1730 Llano Street, Santa Fe, NM 87501, (505) 955-4860. New Mexico State Library, 1209 Camino Carlos Rey, Santa Fe, NM 87507, (505) 476-9717. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Public Reading Room, P.O. Box 1663, Mail Stop M9991, Los Alamos, NM 87545, Phone: (505) 667-0216. Oregon Portland State University, Government

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fayette gillespie llano" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

I  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

IV. Northern South America EIA/ARI World Shale Gas and Shale Oil Resource Assessment IV. Northern South America EIA/ARI World Shale Gas and Shale Oil Resource Assessment May 17, 2013 IV-1 IV. NORTHERN SOUTH AMERICA SUMMARY Northern South America has prospective shale gas and shale oil potential within marine- deposited Cretaceous shale formations in three main basins: the Middle Magdalena Valley and Llanos basins of Colombia, and the Maracaibo/Catatumbo basins of Venezuela and Colombia, Figure IV-1. The organic-rich Cretaceous shales (La Luna, Capacho, and Gacheta) sourced much of the conventional gas and oil produced in Colombia and western Venezuela, and are similar in age to the Eagle Ford and Niobrara shale plays in the USA. Ecopetrol, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil, Shell, and others have initiated shale exploration in Colombia.

102

APECS - The Atacama Pathfinder Experiment Control System  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

APECS is the distributed control system of the new Atacama Pathfinder EXperiment (APEX) telescope located on the Llano de Chajnantor at an altitude of 5107 m in the Atacama desert in northern Chile. APECS is based on Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) software and employs a modern, object-oriented design using the Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA) as the middleware. New generic device interfaces simplify adding instruments to the control system. The Python based observer command scripting language allows using many existing software libraries and facilitates creating more complex observing modes. A new self-descriptive raw data format (Multi-Beam FITS or MBFITS) has been defined to store the multi-beam, multi-frequency data. APECS provides an online pipeline for initial calibration, observer feedback and a quick-look display. APECS is being used for regular science observations in local and remote mode since August 2005.

D. Muders; H. Hafok; F. Wyrowski; E. Polehampton; A. Belloche; C. Koenig; R. Schaaf; F. Schuller; J. Hatchell; F. v. d. Tak

2006-05-04T23:59:59.000Z

103

A Comparative Study of the Mississippian Barnett Shale, Fort Worth Basin, and Devonian Marcellus Shale, Appalachian Basin  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

A Comparative Study of the A Comparative Study of the Mississippian Barnett Shale, Fort Worth Basin, and Devonian Marcellus Shale, Appalachian Basin DOE/NETL-2011/1478 Cover. Top left: The Barnett Shale exposed on the Llano uplift near San Saba, Texas. Top right: The Marcellus Shale exposed in the Valley and Ridge Province near Keyser, West Virginia. Photographs by Kathy R. Bruner, U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE), National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). Bottom: Horizontal Marcellus Shale well in Greene County, Pennsylvania producing gas at 10 million cubic feet per day at about 3,000 pounds per square inch. Photograph by Tom Mroz, USDOE, NETL, February 2010. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors greatly thank Daniel J. Soeder (U.S. Department of Energy) who kindly reviewed the manuscript. His criticisms,

104

1472-6750-11-74[1].pdf  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Switchgrass Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) ubiquitin gene (PvUbi1 and PvUbi2) promoters for use in plant transformation BMC Biotechnology 2011, 11:74 doi:10.1186/1472-6750-11-74 David GJ Mann (dmann1@utk.edu) Zachary R King (zrking@uga.edu) Wusheng Liu (wliu2@utk.edu) Blake L Joyce (bjoyce3@utk.edu) Ryan J Percifield (ryanpercifield@gmail.com) Jennifer S Hawkins (jenshawkins@gmail.com) Peter R LaFayette (plaf@uga.edu) Barbara J Artelt (bartelt@uga.edu) Jason N Burris (jburris1@utk.edu) Mitra Mazarei (mmazarei@utk.edu) Jeffrey L Bennetzen (maize@uga.edu) Wayne A Parrott (wparrott@uga.edu) C Neal Stewart Jr (nealstewart@utk.edu) ISSN 1472-6750 Article type Research article Submission date 20 April 2011 Acceptance date 11 July 2011 Publication date 11 July 2011 Article URL http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6750/11/74 Like all articles in BMC journals,

105

NETL F 451.1-1/1 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Designation Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FE0000699 FE0000699 University of Kentucky FE 315 10 Donald Krastman 5/1/10 -10/1/12 Lexington, Fayette County, KY CAVITATION PRETREATMENT OF A FLOTATION FEEDSTOCK FOR ENHANCED COAL RECOVERY A test program is proposed to evaluate and quantify the technical feasibility and economic benefits of using a cavitation system to pre-aerate flotation feed for conventional flotation cells and flotation 05 12 2010 Donald Krastman Digitally signed by Donald Krastman DN: cn=Donald Krastman, o=NETL, ou=315, email=krastman@netl.doe.gov, c=US Reason: I am approving this document Date: 2010.05.12 15:06:30 -04'00' 05 19 2010 john ganz Digitally signed by john ganz DN: cn=john ganz, o=NETL- DOE, ou=140 OPFC, email=john.ganz@netl.doe.gov, c=US Date: 2010.05.19 09:16:52 -04'00' This CX is approved for University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY bench-scale laboratory testing only.

106

Gatewaycompatible vectors for highthroughput gene functional analysis in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) and other monocot species  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Gateway-compatible Gateway-compatible vectors for high-throughput gene functional analysis in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) and other monocot species David G.J. Mann 1,5,†* , Peter R. LaFayette 2,3,5 , Laura L. Abercrombie 1,5 , Zachary R. King 3,5 , Mitra Mazarei 1,5 , Mathew C. Halter 1 , Charleson R. Poovaiah 1,5 , Holly Baxter 1,5 , Hui Shen 4,5 , Richard A. Dixon 4,5 , Wayne A. Parrott 2,3,5 and C. Neal Stewart Jr 1,5 1 Department of Plant Sciences, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA 2 Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA 3 Institute for Plant Breeding, Genetics & Genomics, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA 4 Plant Biology Division, Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Ardmore, OK, USA 5 The BioEnergy Science Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA Received 31 May 2011; revised 12 June 2011; accepted 10 August 2011.

107

U.S. Energy Information Administration | Annual Coal Report 2012  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Average Sales Price of Coal by State, County, and Number of Mines, 2012 Average Sales Price of Coal by State, County, and Number of Mines, 2012 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Annual Coal Report 2012 Table 30. Average Sales Price of Coal by State, County, and Number of Mines, 2012 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Annual Coal Report 2012 Coal-Producing State and County Number of Mines Sales (thousand short tons) Average Sales Price (dollars per short ton) Alabama 39 19,021 106.57 Bibb 1 w w Blount 2 w w Fayette 1 w w Franklin 1 w w Jackson 2 w w Jefferson 11 4,298 146.04 Marion 1 w w Tuscaloosa 7 8,599 111.55 Walker 11 2,370 81.88 Winston 2 w w Alaska 1 w w Yukon-Koyukuk 1 w w Arizona 1 w w Navajo 1 w w Arkansas 1 w w Sebastian 1 w w Colorado 12 28,856 37.54 Delta 1 w w Gunnison 2 w w La Plata

108

Data:0e80b50c-faab-40da-9338-d6078a1bb0d4 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

0c-faab-40da-9338-d6078a1bb0d4 0c-faab-40da-9338-d6078a1bb0d4 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Coweta-Fayette El Member Corp Effective date: End date if known: Rate name: Large Commercial Sector: Commercial Description: Rate Structure: Service charge: $45 First 10,000 kWh/mo. 12.80¢/kWh Over 10,000 kWh/mo. 10.60¢/kWh All consumption in excess of 200kWh per kW of demand, which is also in excess of 1,000 kWh 4.20¢/kWh All consumption in excess of 400 kWh per kW of demand, which is also in excess of 1,000 kWh 3.70¢/kWh Additional Info: Net Metering: Service to an electric consumer under which electric energy generated by the electric consumer from an eligible on-site generation facility and delivered to the local distribution facilities may be used to offset electric energy provide by the electric utility to the electric consumer during the applicable billing period. For additional information contact the EMC's engineering department.

109

Pontotoc Co. Greene Co. Hale Co. OAK GROVE C OAL D EGAS CEDAR COVE  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

COAL D EGAS BLU E CREEK COAL DEGAS BR OOKWOOD C OAL D EGAS ST AR ROBIN SONS BEND COAL D EGAS BLU FF COR INNE MOU NDVILLE COAL D EGAS BLU EGU T CR EEK WH ITE OAK CREEK COAL DEGAS BEAVERT ON BLU FF FAYETTE W SN EAD S CREEK SPLU NGE PAR HAM N MUSGR OVE CR EEK MCCRAC KEN MOU NTAIN DAVIS C HAPEL BAC ON BLOOMING GROVE MT Z ION FAIRVIEW JASPER BLOWHORN CREEK MAPLE BRAN CH KEN NEDY COAL F IRE CR EEK MCGEE LAKE SILOAM MILLPOR T FERNBANK DAVIS C HAPEL NE DETROIT E BEANS F ERRY LEXIN GT ON PET ERSON COAL D EGAS CALEDONIA ABERD EEN HOL T COAL D EGAS MULDON ELD RIDGE MCKINLEY CREEK TREBLOC HEARTLIN E SH ANNON TROY_MS_D BOXES CREEK WISE GAP NOR THSID E TREMONT VAN VLEET HOL LY BET HEL CHU RCH ABERD EEN S ST RONG BAN KST ON MOLLOY WR EN COR INTH WELLS THORN REID REID HOU STON ST AR DEERLICK CREEK COAL D EGAS OAK GROVE COAL D EGAS BIG SANDY CREEK COAL D EGAS MABEN LITT LE SAND Y CREEK COAL D

110

Data:5c83babc-c230-4d9d-86fc-3222d1b48c58 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

3babc-c230-4d9d-86fc-3222d1b48c58 3babc-c230-4d9d-86fc-3222d1b48c58 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Coweta-Fayette El Member Corp Effective date: 2007/04/01 End date if known: Rate name: Additional Residential Meter Option Sector: Residential Description: Additional Info: The second meter option is for members that have a shop, garage, barn, well pump or some other meter on their property that uses less than 500 kWh per month. The given charges are subject to "Wholesale Power Cost Adjustment". Additional Info: Net Metering: Service to an electric consumer under which electric energy generated by the electric consumer from an eligible on-site generation facility and delivered to the local distribution facilities may be used to offset electric energy provide by the electric utility to the electric consumer during the applicable billing period. For additional information contact the EMC's engineering department.

111

Pontotoc Co. Greene Co. Hale Co. OAK GROVE C OAL D EGAS CEDAR COVE COAL DEGAS  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

COAL DEGAS COAL DEGAS BLU E CREEK COAL DEGAS BR OOKWOOD C OAL D EGAS ST AR ROBIN SONS BEND COAL DEGAS BLU FF COR INNE MOU NDVILLE COAL DEGAS BLU EGU T CR EEK WH ITE OAK CREEK COAL DEGAS BEAVERT ON BLU FF FAYETTE W SN EAD S CREEK SPLU NGE PAR HAM N MUSGR OVE CR EEK MCCRAC KEN MOU NTAIN DAVIS C HAPEL BAC ON BLOOMING GROVE MT Z ION FAIRVIEW JASPER BLOWHORN CREEK MAPLE BRAN CH KEN NEDY COAL F IRE CR EEK MCGEE LAKE SILOAM MILLPOR T FERNBANK DAVIS C HAPEL NE DETROIT E BEANS F ERRY LEXIN GT ON PET ERSON COAL DEGAS CALEDONIA ABERD EEN HOL T COAL DEGAS MULDON ELD RIDGE MCKINLEY CREEK TREBLOC HEARTLIN E SH ANNON TROY_MS_D BOXES CREEK WISE GAP NOR THSID E TREMONT VAN VLEET HOL LY BET HEL CHU RCH ABERD EEN S ST RONG BAN KST ON MOLLOY WR EN COR INT H WELLS THORN REID REID HOU STON ST AR DEERLICK CR EEK C OAL DEGAS OAK GROVE C OAL D EGAS BIG SANDY C REEK COAL D EGAS MABEN LITT LE SAND Y CREEK COAL DEGAS

112

Data:A015c265-9a9d-4143-99f3-f80f1f306fd8 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

A015c265-9a9d-4143-99f3-f80f1f306fd8 A015c265-9a9d-4143-99f3-f80f1f306fd8 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Coweta-Fayette El Member Corp Effective date: 2007/04/01 End date if known: Rate name: Residential Time-Of-Use Sector: Residential Description: Additional Info: Net Metering: Service to an electric consumer under which electric energy generated by the electric consumer from an eligible on-site generation facility and delivered to the local distribution facilities may be used to offset electric energy provide by the electric utility to the electric consumer during the applicable billing period. For additional information contact the EMC's engineering department.

113

Data:960599e9-2a81-459a-99a9-6f93f3da58c9 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

60599e9-2a81-459a-99a9-6f93f3da58c9 60599e9-2a81-459a-99a9-6f93f3da58c9 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Coweta-Fayette El Member Corp Effective date: End date if known: Rate name: Outdoor Lighting Traditionaire 150 W Sector: Lighting Description: Source or reference: http://www.utility.org/otherServices/securityLighting.aspx Source Parent: Comments Applicability Demand (kW) Minimum (kW): Maximum (kW): History (months): Energy (kWh) Minimum (kWh): Maximum (kWh): History (months): Service Voltage Minimum (V): Maximum (V): Character of Service Voltage Category: Phase Wiring: << Previous 1 2

114

Biomass power for rural development. Technical progress report, January 1, 1997--March 31, 1997  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Detailed task progress reports and schedules are provided for the DOE/USDA sponsored Biomass Power for Rural Development project. The focus of the project is on developing commercial energy crops for power generation by the year 2000. The New York based Salix Consortium project is a multi-partner endeavor, implemented in three stages. Phase-1, Final Design and Project Development, will conclude with the preparation of construction and/or operating permits, feedstock production plans, and contracts ready for signature. Field trials of willow (Salix) have been initiated at several locations in New York (Tully, Lockport, King Ferry, La Fayette, Massena, and Himrod) and co-firing tests are underway at Greenidge Station (NYSEG) and Dunkirk Station (NMPC). Phase-II of the project will focus on scale-up of willow crop acreage, construction of co-firing facilities at Dunkirk Station (NMPC), and final modifications for Greenidge Station. Cofiring willow is also under consideration for GPU`s Seward Station where testing is under way. There will be an evaluation of the energy crop as part of the gasification trials occurring at BED`s McNeill power station. Phase-III will represent fullscale commercialization of the energy crop and power generation on a sustainable basis.

Neuhauser, E.

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

115

Biomass power for rural development. Technical progress report, April 1, 1997--June 30, 1997  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Detailed task progress reports and schedules are provided for the DOE/USDA sponsored Biomass Power for Rural Development project. The focus of the project is on developing commercial energy crops for power generation by the year 2000. The New York based Salix Consortium project is a multi-partner endeavor, implemented in three stages. Phase-I, Final Design and Project Development, will conclude with the preparation of construction and/or operating permits, feedstock production plans, and contracts ready for signature. Field trials of willow (Salix) have been initiated at several locations in New York (Tully, Lockport, King Ferry, La Fayette, Massena, and Himrod) and co-firing tests are underway at Greenidge Station (NYSEG) and Dunkirk Station (NMPC). Phase-H of the project will focus on scale-up of willow crop acreage, construction of co-firing facilities at Dunkirk Station (NMPC), and final modifications for Greenidge Station. Cofiring willow is also under consideration for GPU`s Seward Station where testing is under way. There will be an evaluation of the energy crop as part of the gasification trials occurring at BED`s McNeill power station. Phase-III will represent fullscale commercialization of the energy crop and power generation on a sustainable basis.

Neuhauser, E.

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

116

Biomass power for rural development. Technical progress report, October 1--December 31, 1997  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The focus of the DOE/USDA sponsored biomass power for rural development project is to develop commercial energy crops for power generation by the year 2000. The New York based Salix Consortium project is a multi-partner endeavor, implemented in three stages. Phase-1, Final Design and Project Development, will conclude with the preparation of construction and/or operating permits, feedstock production plans, and contracts ready for signature. Field trials of willow (Salix) have been initiated at several locations in New York (Tully, Lockport, King Ferry, La Fayette, Massena, and Himrod) and co-firing tests are underway at Greenidge Station (NYSEG) and Dunkirk Station (NMPC). Phase-2 of the project will focus on scale-up of willow crop acreage, construction of co-firing facilities at Dunkirk Station (NMPC), and final modifications for Greenidge Station. Cofiring willow is also under consideration for GPU`s Seward Station where testing is underway. There will be an evaluation of the energy crop as part of the gasification trials occurring at BED`s McNeill Power Station. Phase-3 will represent fullscale commercialization of the energy crop and power generation on a sustainable basis. During the fourth quarter of 1997 the Consortium submitted a Phase-2 proposal. A few of the other more important milestones are outlined below. The first quarter of 1998 will be dominated by pre-planting activity in the spring.

Neuhauser, E.

1998-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

117

LAKESHORE AVON BR ANT-EDEN ALD EN-LANC ASTER AU BURN W SH ELDON  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

81 81 § ¨ ¦ 81 LAKESHORE AVON BR ANT-EDEN ALD EN-LANC ASTER AU BURN W SH ELDON CALEDONIA HURON C REEK LEIC EST ER COL DEN ASH FORD INDIAN FALLS LAWTONS SAR DINIA RPD-037 -2 GLENWOOD PU LASKI PAVILION CON CORD COL LINS N ELM A ORC HARD PARK-H AMBU RG DANLEY CORNERS ST ILLWAT ER CHAFF EE-ARCAD E FAYETT E-WATERLOO LAKEVIEW JAVA SEN EC A W ELLER Y AU RORA E ZOAR BU FFALO TIOGA SILVER LAKE AKR ON ROM E RAT HBON E ALM A BET HANY WYOMING ULYSSES BR ANCH W SAN DY CREEK COL LINS BLOOMFIELD E LEBANON STATE LINE ALLEN CHUR CHVILLE BATH ATT ICA ELLI COT VILLE ROU LETT E BR ADFORD BU FFALO CREEK PEN N YAN N BEECH HILL-INDEPENDENC E GERRY-CH ARLOTTE STAGECOACH CHIPMUN K HEBRON VIN CENT BALD WI NSVILLE AKELEY OLEAN COWLESVILLE AN NIN SMET HPORT BR ADLEY BR OOK BU STI FIVE MILE BLOOMFIELD W SEN EC A FALLS NILE STAGECOACH LEWIS R UN BR ADFORD CAMDEN VAN ETT EN ROAN OKE SH ARON RICHBU RG FULTON N FINN EGAN H ILL TONAWANDA

118

Data:550854e5-5f2d-4c68-9b34-7da6a9a2fc1e | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

4e5-5f2d-4c68-9b34-7da6a9a2fc1e 4e5-5f2d-4c68-9b34-7da6a9a2fc1e No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Coweta-Fayette El Member Corp Effective date: 2007/04/01 End date if known: Rate name: Residential Sector: Residential Description: Additional Info: Net Metering: Service to an electric consumer under which electric energy generated by the electric consumer from an eligible on-site generation facility and delivered to the local distribution facilities may be used to offset electric energy provide by the electric utility to the electric consumer during the applicable billing period. For additional information contact the EMC's engineering department.

119

Getting the most from compost  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Composting, throughout history, has been one of the oldest, cheapest, and most environmentally friendly waste management tools. Yet, in the modern era, composting on a large scale has run into many economic and operational snags--especially in municipal programs--despite the rosy predictions of the compost industry's waste diversion potential. What has kept this natural, seemingly foolproof municipal waste management method from wholesale success According to many, it is a combination of poor planning, anemic budgets, and a general lack of understanding of the science of composting--understanding that can usually be found in the private sector. ''In my experience, there's a hell of a lot of municipalities doing small operations, but most of the large operations are private,'' says Steve Jones, vice president of DK Recycling Systems, Inc. (Lake Bluff, Ill.), which operates 12 composting facilities in northern Illinois. According to Robert Gillespie, DK's president, the composting success hinges not only on the source of funds, but on the people involved as well. For a composting system to be successful, the designer--either privately or publicly funded--must be sensitive to the biology of composting and how field applications differ from laboratory settings. Some companies compost only leaves, brush and wood, while others also take grass clipping and food wastes.

Dabaie, M.

1994-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

120

Small boiler uses waste coal  

SciTech Connect

Burning coal waste in small boilers at low emissions poses considerable problem. While larger boiler suppliers have successfully installed designs in the 40 to 80 MW range for some years, the author has been developing small automated fluid bed boiler plants for 25 years that can be applied in the range of 10,000 to 140,000 lbs/hr of steam. Development has centered on the use of an internally circulating fluid bed (CFB) boiler, which will burn waste fuels of most types. The boiler is based on the traditional D-shaped watertable boiler, with a new type of combustion chamber that enables a three-to-one turndown to be achieved. The boilers have all the advantages of low emissions of the large fluid boilers while offering a much lower height incorporated into the package boiler concept. Recent tests with a waste coal that had a high nitrogen content of 1.45% demonstrated a NOx emission below the federal limit of 0.6 lbs/mm Btu. Thus a NOx reduction on the order of 85% can be demonstrate by combustion modification alone. Further reductions can be made by using a selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) system and sulfur absorption of up to 90% retention is possible. The article describes the operation of a 30,000 lbs/hr boiler at the Fayette Thermal LLC plant. Spinheat has installed three ICFB boilers at a nursing home and a prison, which has been tested on poor-grade anthracite and bituminous coal. 2 figs.

Virr, M.J. [Spinheat Ltd. (United States)

2009-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "fayette gillespie llano" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Energy technologies advancement program underway  

SciTech Connect

The State of California is reducing the risk of developing new, innovative energy technologies under its Energy Technologies Advancement Program (ETAP), which is administered by the California Energy Commission (CEC). In the first funding round, 38 applications were received, and the Energy Commission's Research, Development, and Demonstration Committee has recommended six projects from private companies for initial funding. They are: ARCO Solar Inc. - research for $925,000 to develop thin film photovoltaic modules that capture the sun's rays and convert them into electricity; Alternative Energy Institute - research for $135,000 to collect and concentrate sunlight via a series of tracking parabolic dishes (heliostats), and transfer collected light into the interior of a commercial building; Solar Turbines Inc. - research for $52,500 to test a liquid fuel injection system that results in a reduction of oxides of nitrogen in cogeneration gas turbines; Pacific Gas and Electric Company - research for $500,000 to establish a program for field testing and evaluating emerging new photovoltaic technologies; San Diego Gas and Electric Company - research contract to test and evaluate the largest geothermal power plant in the world using an organic rankine cycle steam turbine, which uses a fluid with a lower-than-normal boiling point, thereby potentially generating electricity with lower temperature heat; and Fayette Manufacturing Corporation - loan contract for $1,250,000 to demonstrate the technical and economic feasibility of a new heat cycle process called the Kalina Cycle. The CEC will soon be releasing a Request for Proposals (RFP) for both private and public organizations for the second-round ETAP solicitation.

1986-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

122

Biomass power for rural development. Technical progress report, July 1--September 30, 1997  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The focus of the DOE/USDA sponsored biomass power for rural development project is to develop commercial energy crops for power generation by the year 2000. The New York based Salix Consortium project is a multi-partner endeavor, implemented in three stages. Phase-1, Final Design and Project Development, will conclude with the preparation of construction and/or operating permits, feedstock production plans, and contracts ready for signature. Field trials of willow (Salix) have been initiated at several locations in New York (Tully, Lockport, King Ferry, La Fayette, Massena, and Himrod) and co-firing tests are underway at Greenidge Station (NYSEG) and Dunkirk Station (NMPC). Phase-2 of the project will focus on scale-up of willow crop acreage, construction of co-firing facilities at Dunkirk Station (NMPC), and final modifications for Greenidge Station. Cofiring willow is also under consideration for GPU`s Seward Station where testing is underway. There will be an evaluation of the energy crop as part of the gasification trials occurring at BED`s McNeill power station. Phase-3 will represent fullscale commercialization of the energy crop and power generation on a sustainable basis. During the third quarter of 1997, much of the Consortium`s effort has focused on outreach activities, continued feedstock development, fuel supply planning, and fuel contract development, and preparation for 1998 scale-up activities. The Consortium also submitted a Phase-1 extension proposal during this period. A few of the more important milestones are outlined below. The fourth quarter of 1997 is expected to be dominated by Phase-II proposal efforts and planning for 1998 activities.

Neuhauser, E.

1998-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

123

Stored groundwater--A force to reckon with in the geomorphology of central and north Texas  

SciTech Connect

The Colorado and Brazos Rivers flow in exhumed pre-middle-Cretaceous valleys between the Caprock Escarpment and the Balcones Fault Zone. Some segments flow southeastward, defining lineaments that are expressed in Cretaceous and Tertiary rocks as well as in older ones, but other segments clearly reflect the older topography. The early Cretaceous valleys were filled episodically by uncemented sand, silt, and dolomitic clay prior to complete inundation of Texas by the late Fredericksburg sea. The authors suggest that groundwater stored in the unconsolidated material played a major role in late Tertiary/early Pleistocene exhumation of the paleovalleys. The first tributary to cut into the Hensel/Gillespie Sands at Marble Falls intersected a paleovalley filled by water-bearing sand. A conservative estimate suggests that more than 100 million acre/feet of water (20,000 square miles x 640 acres x 30 feet of sand x 30% porosity) would have been tapped. Successful streams would excavate rapidly headward as well as downstream, and would soon capture nearby, less successful streams still flowing above the aquifer. The result would not be a catastrophic flood, but would be a geologically very rapid increase in sustained baseflow. The Brazos Valley below the Caprock does not appear to have such a well-marked point of paleovalley discharge, but has a broadly similar geometry. Water stored in the Antlers Sand may have provided even larger volume than that in the Hensel/Gellespie. Implications of this scenario for sediment deposition are intriguing. A newly-formed trunk stream that tapped a major ground-water reservoir would display a rapid increase in baseflow discharge, accompanied by erosion downstream. A major shoreline deposit might form, whose timing was unrelated to regional climatic events or global sea-level changes.

Hayward, O.T. (Baylor Univ., Waco, TX (United States). Dept. of Geology); Amsbury, D.L.

1993-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

124

Precambrian basement geology of the Permian basin region of west Texas and Eastern New Mexico: A geophysical perspective  

SciTech Connect

Because most of the Permian basin region of west Texas and southern New Mexico is covered by Phanerozoic rocks, other means must be found to examine the Precambrian upper crustal geology of the region. We have combined geologic information on the Precambrian from outcrops and wells with geophysical information from gravity and magnetic surveys in an integrated analysis of the history and structure of basement rocks in the region. Geophysical anomalies can be related to six Precambrian events: formation of the Early Proterozoic outer tectonic belt, igneous activity in the southern Granite-Rhyolite province, an episode of pre-Grenville extension, the Grenville orogeny, rifting to form the Delaware aulacogen, and Eocambrian rifting to form the early Paleozoic continental margin. Two geophysical features were studied in detail: the Abilene gravity minimum and the Central Basin platform gravity high. The Abilene gravity minimum is shown to extend from the Delaware basin across north-central Texas and is interpreted to be caused by a granitic batholith similar in size to the Sierra Nevada batholith in California and Nevada. This batholith appears to be related to formation of the southern Granite- Rhyolite province, possibly as a continental margin arc batholith. Because of this interpretation, we have located the Grenville tectonic front southward from its commonly quoted position, closer to the Llano uplift. Middle Proterozoic mafic intrusions are found to core the Central Basin platform and the Roosevelt uplift. These intrusions formed at about 1.1 Ga and are related in time to both the Mid-Continent rift system and the Grenville orogeny in Texas. Precambrian basement structures and changes in lithology have influenced the structure and stratigraphy in the overlying Permian basin, and thus have potential exploration significance.

Adams, D.C.; Keller, G.R. [Univ. of Texas, El Paso, TX (United States)

1996-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

125

Phase behavior and miscible process analysis of Cusiana Field hydrocarbon system using a reduced component equation of state  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Cusiana Field is located in the foothill belt of Llanos basin in eastern Colombia. This field has large reserves of light hydrocarbons in Mirador (Tertiary), Barco and Guadalupe (Cretaceous) formations. The development of this field beginning with Mirador formation is underway, and includes a gas cycling project. A complex hydrocarbon system has been found in the reservoirs. Because of vertical compositional variation, fluids grade from retrograde gas to black oil as they pass through critical conditions. Phase behavior of these fluids has an important effect on the in-place volume determination and on field development strategies. Previous reservoir analysis and predictions have been done using a 10-component equation of state (EOS), characterized with the help of an extensive laboratory measurement program, including PVT depletion experiments, separation-type tests, and gas injection tests. We developed a reduced component equation of state to reduce time and resources required for full-field compositional simulations using the 10-component EOS. Three different lumping schemes were tried, two of them with six components and one with seven. A validation process was carried out to check the consistency of this reduced component EOS. This process consisted of two steps: The first step was the match of a large set of "experimental" type data generated with the 10-component EOS. The second step was the matching of the saturation and compositional path followed by reservoir oil during a simulated gas injection displacement process. A coreflood experiment and a two-dimensional cross-section of the reservoir were simulated with a one-dimensional and a two-dimensional model, respectively. These models, previously developed by British Petroleum, matched laboratory and field data using the 10-component EOS. Here, we replaced the 10-component EOS with our reduced component EOS and compared the results. All three reduced EOS successfully went through the first step of validation, matching the "experimental" PVT data, but only the seven-component EOS got a good match of the oil saturation and compositional path in the second step. This seven-component EOS reduced the simulation time to about 68% for the one-dimensional case and to 60% for the two-dimensional case. Although multicontact miscibility is not reached during the gas displacement process, vaporization of oil by injected lean gas proved to be an efficient oil recovery mechanism.

Brunal Florez, Antonio Jose

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

126

P450 aromatase alterations and DNA damage as avian pollution biomarkers in cliff and cave swallow breeding near the Rio Grande region, Texas  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The endocrine system, specifically relating to sex hormones, and genetic material can be targets of environmental contaminants. Environmental contaminants in the Rio Grande region may originate from industrial or agricultural processes and growing populations lacking proper water and sewage infrastructure. Cliff (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota) and cave (P. fulva) swallows breeding near the Rio Grande were selected to monitor aromatase activity alterations and DNA damage. Swallows were sampled at six sites along the Rio Grande from Brownsville to Laredo, and a reference site (Somerville) 350 miles north of the Rio Grande. DNA damage, based on nuclear DNA content, was determined by flow cytometry. A significantly larger mean half peak coefficient of variation (HPCV) of DNA content in contaminated sites compared to a reference site reflects possible chromosomal damage. No detectable HPCV differences were observed in cave swallows among locations, notwithstanding the presence of mutagenic contaminants. Selenium may provide a protective role against genetic damage. However, cliff swallows from Laredo had significantly higher HPCV values than those from Somerville. DNA damage could be attributed to metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons released near Laredo. Brains and gonads, two estrogen-dependent organs, were tested for aromatase activity with a tritiated water method. Brain aromatase activity was higher, though not always statistically, for male cave and male and female cliff swallows. Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE) may play a role in the increased activity. Female cave swallows in Llano Grande appeared to have a greatly depressed brain aromatase activity, possibly attributed to past human use of toxaphene. Testicular and ovarian aromatase activity in cliff and cave swallows from Rio Grande was higher than in those from Somerville, though not always significantly. DDE, atrazine, sewage treatment plant contaminants (phthalates, alkylphenols, ethynylestradiol), metals, or other pollutants could play a role in the increased gonadal activity. Increased aromatase activity, in association with contaminants, may be easier to detect in testes of male birds which normally exhibit low levels of estrogen. Siterelated contaminants may be playing a role in DNA damage and aromatase alterations. This is the first known study which uses aromatase activity as an endocrine disruptor indicator in wild birds.

Sitzlar, Megan Annette

2005-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

127

A core-based assessment of the spatial relationship of small faults associated with a basement-controlled, large normal fault in the Hickory Sandstone  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This research characterized a system of small faults (displacement < 0.3 m) in seven closely-spaced continuous 2.4 inch (6.1 cm) diameter cores. Cores were obtained from central Texas, on the western edge of the Llano Uplift. Cores penetrate a dip-slip dominant, normal fault (Nobles Fault) with 18.3 m (60 ft) of stratigraphic throw. The spatial, geometric and kinematic attributes of small faults within the Nobles Fault system were characterized to explore potential cause-and-effect relationships. To quantify spatial distributions, a "density" measure based on individual small fault magnitude was utilized. Approximately half of the small faults in the core possessed no discernible offset markers; thus displacement amount for these faults could not be measured directly. Using a nonparametric method in which an alternating conditional expectation determined optimal transformations for the data, a statistically significant empirical correlation was established for faults with measurable gouge thickness, displacement, protolith mean grain size and sorting. Gouge thickness of small faults was found to be dependant upon the displacement amount of the small fault and the textural characteristics of the host protolith. The role of protolith lithology, proximity to crystalline basement, and structural position relative to the Nobles Fault system were examined to explain observed ubiquitous spatial distribution of small faults. Small faults were found to occur in clusters and the number of faults per foot only weakly correlates to the cumulative displacement of the corresponding faults. The amount of mudstone present is the dominant factor controlling small fault formation. Intervals with only minor quantities of mudstone have the largest number of faults per foot as well as largest associated cumulative displacement per foot. Frequency of occurrence of small faults near the basement is greater when compared to similar lithologies higher in the core. Intensity of small faults do not universally increase with proximity to large faults. To observe an increase in small faults, it is necessary to use a mean global cumulative displacement approach. Zones of greater than average cumulative displacement of small faults in close proximity to large faults were observed in zones that are compatible with faultfault interaction.

Graff, Mitchell C

2006-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

128

Full-Scale Testing of a Mercury Oxidation Catalyst Upstream of a Wet FGD System  

SciTech Connect

This document presents and discusses results from Cooperative Agreement DE-FC26-06NT42778, 'Full-scale Testing of a Mercury Oxidation Catalyst Upstream of a Wet FGD System,' which was conducted over the time-period July 24, 2006 through June 30, 2010. The objective of the project was to demonstrate at full scale the use of solid honeycomb catalysts to promote the oxidation of elemental mercury in pulverized-coal-fired flue gas. Oxidized mercury is removed downstream in wet flue gas desulfurization (FGD) absorbers and collected with the byproducts from the FGD system. The project was co-funded by EPRI, the Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA), who also provided the host site, Great River Energy, Johnson Matthey, Southern Company, Salt River Project (SRP), the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), NRG Energy, Ontario Power and Westar. URS Group was the prime contractor and also provided cofunding. The scope of this project included installing and testing a gold-based catalyst upstream of one full-scale wet FGD absorber module (about 200-MW scale) at LCRA's Fayette Power Project (FPP) Unit 3, which fires Powder River Basin coal. Installation of the catalyst involved modifying the ductwork upstream of one of three wet FGD absorbers on Unit 3, Absorber C. The FGD system uses limestone reagent, operates with forced sulfite oxidation, and normally runs with two FGD modules in service and one spare. The full-scale catalyst test was planned for 24 months to provide catalyst life data. Over the test period, data were collected on catalyst pressure drop, elemental mercury oxidation across the catalyst module, and mercury capture by the downstream wet FGD absorber. The demonstration period began on May 6, 2008 with plans for the catalyst to remain in service until May 5, 2010. However, because of continual increases in pressure drop across the catalyst and concerns that further increases would adversely affect Unit 3 operations, LCRA decided to end the demonstration early, during a planned unit outage. On October 2, 2009, Unit 3 was taken out of service for a fall outage and the catalyst upstream of Absorber C was removed. This ended the demonstration after approximately 17 months of the planned 24 months of operation. This report discusses reasons for the pressure drop increase and potential measures to mitigate such problems in any future application of this technology. Mercury oxidation and capture measurements were made on Unit 3 four times during the 17-month demonstration. Measurements were performed across the catalyst and Absorber C and 'baseline' measurements were performed across Absorber A or B, which did not have a catalyst upstream. Results are presented in the report from all four sets of measurements during the demonstration period. These results include elemental mercury oxidation across the catalyst, mercury capture across Absorber C downstream of the catalyst, baseline mercury capture across Absorber A or B, and mercury re-emissions across both absorbers in service. Also presented in the report are estimates of the average mercury control performance of the oxidation catalyst technology over the 17-month demonstration period and the resulting mercury control costs.

Gary Blythe; Jennifer Paradis

2010-06-30T23:59:59.000Z