Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Secure Facilities & Capabilities | National Security | ORNL  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Facilities Events and Conferences Supporting Organizations National Security Home | Science & Discovery | National Security | Facilities SHARE Secure Facilities and Capabilities...

2

Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Security Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan Welcome to the 2013 version of the Headquarters Facilities Master Security...

3

Facilities | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

The National Nuclear Security Administration Facilities Home > About Us > Our Programs > Defense Programs > Office of Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation > Office of Test...

4

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

oversees and controls all Sandia National Laboratory (SNL) site visits to maintain security of operations and authorized access to SNL, its buildings and facilities in...

5

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

RESPONSIBILITIES RESPONSIBILITIES FSO Overview FSO Reporting Responsibilities Questions an FSOs at a Non-Possesssing Site Could Be Asked During an Audit Non-Possessing Contractor Security Requirements Plan Training for Facility Security Officers (FSOs) PHY-210DE Facility Security Officer Overview PHY-210DB, Introduction to Facility Security Officer (Self-Study Course ) Duration: 3 days Description: This correspondence course provides an overview of the roles and responsibilities of the DOE or DOE-contractor FSO. The course emphasizes facility clearance requirements, personnel security, information security, incident reporting, and other related programs. The course references the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM) (DoD 5220.22-M) and a comprehensive listing of DOE orders, manuals, guides, forms, and notices.

6

Office of Headquarters Security Operations - Headquarters Facilities...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Headquarters Security Operations HomeIntroduction Physical Security Limited Areas and Vault-Type Rooms Personnel Security Foreign Ownership, Control or Influence; Facility...

7

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

REPORTING REQUIREMENTS REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Reporting Requirements Matrix Special Message from the Corporate Investigations Office REPORTING PERSONNEL SECURITY CONCERNS If you report an incident of security concern involving yourself or a coworker, you must do so in writing with signature and date. Your report should contain factual and comprehensive information regarding the incident. A good rule of thumb is to ask yourself did I cover the "Who, What, When, Where, and How." If you did, your report will most likely provide all of the necessary information needed by personnel security to render an adjudicative action or decision. FSO Reporting Responsibilities List of company changes that need to be reported by the FSO. SF 2730-NCB, Name Change Request DOE F 5631.29, Security Termination Statement

8

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

FOREIGN OWNERSHIP, CONTROL OR INFLUENCE (FOCI) PROGRAM FOREIGN OWNERSHIP, CONTROL OR INFLUENCE (FOCI) PROGRAM It is DOE policy to obtain information that indicates whether a company that SNL will enter into a contract with is Owned, Controlled, or Influenced by a foreign person or entity and whether as a result, the potential for an undue risk to the common defense and national security may exist. Reference: Department of Energy Order (DOE O) 470.1, Safeguards and Security Program, Change 1, Chapter VI, Section 1 The DOE conducts a background check to determine FOCI, based on the information the company provides through the e-FOCI website: https://foci.td.anl.gov. Upon favorable FOCI certification by DOE, a facility clearance is granted. Facility cleareance is required in order to support personnel clearances needed to perform the work under contractual agreement with Sandia.

9

Homeland Security Issues for Facilities  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The events of September 11, 2001, along with the Oklahoma City bombing and Washington, DC area sniper attacks have forever changed America's sense of security. Federal, state, and local governments, businesses, and individual homeowners have become more aware of safety, security, and protecting property and people should similar incidents occur in the future. The initial steps in facility protection are identifying potential threats and evaluating the condition of existing building infrastructure and systems. After assessments are complete, the results should be compared with guidelines and recommendations produced by government agencies or professional organizations. Areas to address to enhance security and safety include ventilation, control systems, air filtration, alarm systems, building access, and surveillance. This paper will look at the objectives of task forces, sources of information, and measures owners can take in schools and other facilities. Although actions involving increased awareness, structural reinforcement, and emergency water supplies are important, this discussion will focus on mechanical and security systems and related items. The authors' experiences in assisting Texas school districts will also be shared.

McClure, J. D.; Fisher, D.; Fenter, T.

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

10

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

RANDOM DRUG TESTING RANDOM DRUG TESTING The requirement to conduct random drug testing is the result of a memorandum from the previous Secretary of Energy, Samuel Bodman, directing DOE sites to begin random drug testing for all positions that require access authorizations. The decision was based on: A DOE Task Force Review of the Departmental Personnel Security Program completed in February 2007. "A desire to ensure the safety and security of workers, DOE sites, and surrounding communities," Bodman said in the memorandum. Drug Testing Requirements Pre-employment & Clearance Applicants. November 1, 2007, DOE stopped accepting clearance request packages without drug testing results. This includes initial clearances and reinstatements. New Testing Designated Positions (TDP). Any Member of the Workforce who holds an L or Q clearance that will be tested at a 30% random sampling rate.

11

High Explosives Application Facility | National Nuclear Security...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog The National Nuclear Security Administration High Explosives Application Facility Home > About Us > Our...

12

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 2 FSO News For SNL Facility Security Officers FSO Workshop 2012-CANCELLED This year's FSO Workshop has been cancelled due to lack of interest (less than 18% of our FSOs indicated they would attend this year). Instead, we will spend some serious time improving existing tools and developing new tools for you. This includes upgrading the FSO toolcart, developing SNL-specific FSO training, and looking into offering teleconferences or webinars. Here's some of your feedback that we will use for upcoming topics and improvements: Keep up with form revisions on the FSO website. Consider separate training for non-possessing (construction) versus possessing sites. Provide training on: Changes to DOE directives and upcoming changes to the complex. Where to report different things.

13

Facility Energy Decision System (FEDS) Software ...  

The Facility Energy Decision Systemor FEDSSoftware is a user-friendly, menu-driven, Windows-based software program that provides a comprehensive ...

14

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Program Planning and Management DOE M 470.4-1, Chg 2, dated 102010, Safeguards and Security Program Planning and Management Physical Security DOE NAP 70.2, Chg 1, dated 72011,...

15

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

BASE REGULATIONS BASE REGULATIONS ***Announcement*** Starting April 4, 2011, SNL will no longer use the EAL. All incoming visits (US Citizens) to SNL facilities on KAFB must be submitted using either the unclassified visit or classified visit process Entering the Base Visitors with a standard DOE badge or a valid visitor badge issued from Sandia/New Mexico may present it to the guard at any KAFB gate and be granted entry. Visitors who obtain a visitor badge from the Sandia Badge Office use this to gain entry to the base. Vehicle passes for visitors are no longer required. The guard may verify the following information from visitors: Current registration Proof of insurance Driver's license Rental agreement (if applicable) Remember that your host has primary responsibility for ensuring that the details of your visit, including base entry, are properly coordinated beforehand with Sandia Security and with KAFB. Prospective visitors or Sandia hosts who have questions about the process may contact the Badge Office at (505) 284-3626.

16

Contained Firing Facility | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Contained Firing Facility | National Nuclear Security Administration Contained Firing Facility | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Contained Firing Facility Home > About Us > Our Programs > Defense Programs > Office of Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation > Office of Research and Development > Facilities > Contained Firing Facility

17

Infrastructure and Facilities Management | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Infrastructure and Facilities Management | National Nuclear Security Infrastructure and Facilities Management | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Infrastructure and Facilities Management Home > content > Infrastructure and Facilities Management Infrastructure and Facilities Management NNSA restores, rebuilds, and revitalizes the physical infrastructure of the

18

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

U.S. DOE SECURITY CLEARANCES U.S. DOE SECURITY CLEARANCES Clearnce Home Initial Clearance Clearance Reinstate Clearance Upgrade Clearance Downgrade Clearance Extension Clearance Reciprocity Clearance Reinvestigation Clearance Termination Clearance Transfer Sandia National Laboratories sponsors and processes U.S. DOE Security Clearances for contractor personnel working on an authorized contract requiring access to classified information. Clearance Office Functions Contractor Pre-Process Background Review Certification Clearance File Change Drug Testing e-Fingerprinting Enrollment Process Maintaining a DOE Security Clearance During an Extended Absence DOE Personnel Security Reporting Requirements Data Report on Spouse/Cohabitant Name Change Change in Citizenship Contractor Clearance Tools Clearance Action Status Inquiries

19

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

OPSEC OPSEC What is OPSEC? Millitary term for Operations Security Five-step process / Simplified Two-step Supplements formal security disciplines Industry wide (private and govt.) Goals of OPSEC To raise security awareness Make intelligence or information gathering difficult To attempt to stop adversaries from obtaining classified or sensitive information Basic OPSEC Practices Properly handle and destroy classified and sensitive unclassified information Phones, Cell phones, faxes, and radios are subject to interception Be security minded when doing these activities Use the most secure means of communicating Guard against unsolicited inquiries to obtain sensitive information (by person, phone, email, or social sites) Ensure sensitive information is not put in recycling or trash

20

High Explosives Application Facility | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Explosives Application Facility | National Nuclear Security Explosives Application Facility | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog The National Nuclear Security Administration High Explosives Application Facility Home > About Us > Our Programs > Defense Programs > Office of Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation > Office of Research and Development >

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

CNST NanoFab Facility User Computer Security and Usage ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Page 1. CNST NanoFab Facility User Computer Security and Usage Policy ... CNST NanoFab Facility User Computer Security and Usage Policy ...

2013-07-31T23:59:59.000Z

22

Facilities | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Inertial Confinement Fusion Inertial Confinement Fusion Facilities Home > About Us > Our Programs > Defense Programs > Office of Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation > Office of Inertial Confinement Fusion > Facilities Facilities Office of Inertial Confinement Fusion, Facilities ICF operates a set of world-class experimental facilities to create HEDP conditions and to obtain quantitative data in support of its numerous stockpile stewardship-related activities. To learn about three high energy experimental facilities and two small lasers that provide ICF capabilities, select the links below. National Ignition Facility, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory OMEGA and OMEGA EP, University of Rochester Laboratory for Laser Energetics Z Machine, Sandia National Laboratories

23

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

require authoization be obtained throught the SNL Foreign National Request (FNR) Security Plan (SP) electronic process. The Contractor and Subcontractor must notify their...

24

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

BRIEFINGS SEC050, Initial Security Briefing Required For All individuals, cleared and uncleared, who are newly hired, assigned, or transferred to a site. Note: The briefing must be...

25

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

SNL SECURITY CONTACTS SNLNM Contacts SNLCA Contacts Function Contact Email Telephone Badge Office 505-284-3626 - Escorting Gracie Wells grwells@sandia.gov 505-284-0962...

26

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2011 FSO Conference August 11, 2011 Click here to view the agenda. The Safeguards and Security Communications Team would like to thank everyone who attended this year's FSO...

27

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

the potential danger associated with an item is questionable, consult the physical security contact for additional information. Illegal drugs (does not include controlled...

28

Facilities | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Office of Defense Science Office of Defense Science Facilities Home > About Us > Our Programs > Defense Programs > Office of Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation > Office of Research and Development > Facilities Facilities Office of Research and Development, Facilities The Office of Research and Development manages and oversees the operation of an exceptional suite of science, technology, and engineering facilities that support and further the national stockpile stewardship agenda. Of varying size, scope and capabilities, the facilities work in a concert to accomplish the following activities: Annual assessment of the stockpile in the face of increasing challenges due to aging or remanufacture, Reduced response times for resolving stockpile issues, Timely and certifiable completion of Life Extension Programs,

29

Facilities | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Office of Defense Science Facilities Home > About Us > Our Programs > Defense Programs > Office of Research, Development, Test Capabilities and Evaluation > Office of Research and...

30

Facilities | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Office of Defense Science Facilities Home > About Us > Our Programs > Defense Programs > Office of Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation > Office of Research and Development...

31

Facilities | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Home > About Us > Our Programs > Defense Programs > Office of Research, Development, Test Capabilities and Evaluation > Office of Test Capabilities and Evaluation > Facilities...

32

Facilities | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Inertial Confinement Fusion Facilities Home > About Us > Our Programs > Defense Programs > Office of Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation > Office of Inertial Confinement...

33

Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Decision System...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Facility Energy Decision System Software to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Facility Energy Decision System Software on Facebook Tweet about Federal...

34

Public Reading Facilities | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Reading Facilities | National Nuclear Security Administration Reading Facilities | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Public Reading Facilities Home > About Us > Our Operations > NNSA Office of General Counsel > Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) > Public Reading Facilities Public Reading Facilities The FOIA and E-FOIA require that specific types of records as well as

35

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

OVERVIEW OVERVIEW SPECIAL MESSAGE Please refer to this website each time you need to generate a required form. This will ensure that you are using the most recent version of the form. Do not download the form and save on place it on your hard drive. Proper Completion of Security Termination Statements: When completing Security Termination Statements for submittal to DOE, please ensure the reason for termination is clear and provides the reason(s) for termination. This will allow DOE to make any necessary determinations that may affect clearance eligibility. For example, simply including "terminated" or "for cause" does not provide enough information to DOE for processing. Please direct questions to Joanne Trujillo at 284-2554 or jmtruji@sandia.gov in NM and Carol James 294-2061or cdjames@sandia.gov in CA.

36

Security and Access Policy Security of and access to campus facilities, including campus residences  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Security and Access Policy Security of and access to campus facilities, including campus residences facilities. Residence halls are secured 24 hours a day. Over extended breaks, the doors of all residence halls will be secured around the clock. Some facilities may have individual hours, which may vary

Escher, Christine

37

Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers SEPTEMBER 2010 Solar Energy: www.ntis.gov/help/ordermethods.aspx PROCURING SOLAR ENERGY: A GUIDE FOR FEDERAL FACILITY DECISION MAKERS #12;September 2010 3 Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers Blaise

38

Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements October 8, 2013 - 2:02pm Addthis Section 432 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 requires agencies to report Federal facility energy and water use. Section 432 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 requires agencies to report Federal facility energy and water use. The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) is responsible for tracking Federal agency progress toward meeting Section 432 of the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007 for Federal facility energy and water management and benchmarking. The EISA 432 Compliance Tracking System (EISA 432 CTS) tracks agency

39

Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Facility Reporting » Energy Independence and Facility Reporting » Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements October 8, 2013 - 2:02pm Addthis Section 432 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 requires agencies to report Federal facility energy and water use. Section 432 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 requires agencies to report Federal facility energy and water use. The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) is responsible for tracking Federal agency progress toward meeting Section 432 of the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007 for Federal facility energy and water management and benchmarking.

40

Record of Decision Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test Facility  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8:45 am BILLING CODE 6450-01-P Record of Decision Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test Facility AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Record of decision. SUMMARY: The...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 6 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security Clearance Decisions-2006 Dataset Summary Description adjudication of security clearance cases for contractor personnel Tags {"security clearance","national security","defense industry","defense contractor"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/13/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4455 Public Access Level public Data Dictionary http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/ Data Download URL http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/2006

42

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 3 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security Clearance Decisions-2003 Dataset Summary Description adjudication of security clearance cases for contractor personnel Tags {"security clearance","national security","defense industry","defense contractor"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/10/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4452 Public Access Level public Data Dictionary http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/ Data Download URL http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/2003

43

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

8 8 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security Clearance Decisions-2008 Dataset Summary Description adjudication of security clearance cases for contractor personnel Tags {"security clearance","national security","defense industry","defense contractor"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/15/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4457 Public Access Level public Data Dictionary http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/ Data Download URL http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/2008

44

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

10 10 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security Clearance Decisions-2010 Dataset Summary Description adjudication of security clearance cases for contractor personnel Tags {"security clearance","national security","defense industry","defense contractor"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/17/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4459 Public Access Level public Data Dictionary http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/ Data Download URL http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/2010

45

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 2 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security Clearance Decisions-2002 Dataset Summary Description adjudication of security clearance cases for contractor personnel Tags {"security clearance","national security","defense industry","defense contractor"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/09/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4451 Public Access Level public Data Dictionary http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/ Data Download URL http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/2002

46

Groundbreaking at National Ignition Facility | National Nuclear Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Groundbreaking at National Ignition Facility | National Nuclear Security Groundbreaking at National Ignition Facility | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Our History > NNSA Timeline > Groundbreaking at National Ignition Facility Groundbreaking at National Ignition Facility May 29, 1997 Livermore, CA Groundbreaking at National Ignition Facility

47

Office of Headquarters Security Operations - Headquarters Facilities...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6, Equivalencies and Exemptions Describes DOE Headquarters procedures for requesting Equivalencies and Exemptions to DOE security directives...

48

Facility location selection using fuzzy topsis under group decisions  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This work presents a fuzzy TOPSIS model under group decisions for solving the facility location selection problem, where the ratings of various alternative locations under different subjective attributes and the importance weights of all attributes are ... Keywords: facility location, fuzzy TOPSIS, group decisions, interval arithmetic, ranking

Ta-Chung Chu

2002-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

49

CGI Information Technology Security Evaluation & Test Facility  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... [17CMH2/02] Test methods for Physical Security Level 4, in accordance with FIPS 140-2. Cryptographic Modules Software 1 Testing. ...

2013-08-02T23:59:59.000Z

50

Underground Facility at Nevada National Security Site | National...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog U1A Underground Facility at Nevada National Security Site Home > About Us > Our Programs > Defense Programs > Office of Research,...

51

Facility will focus on bioenergy, global food security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Facility will focus on bioenergy, global food security Facility will focus on bioenergy, global food security Facility will focus on bioenergy, global food security The New Mexico Consortium expects to complete the 27,000 square foot laboratory and office facility next spring. May 22, 2012 Aerial view of Los Alamos National Laboratory Aerial view of Los Alamos National Laboratory. Contact Kevin Roark Communications Office (505) 665-9202 Email Los Alamos, N.M., May 22, 2012 - U.S. Senator Tom Udall (D-NM) spoke at the groundbreaking ceremony marking the start of construction on the New Mexico Consortium's (NMC) biological research facility last Friday afternoon. Senator Udall noted New Mexico's novel and extensive contributions to our nation's renewable energy efforts and congratulated LANL, the NMC, and Richard Sayre on their commitment to advancing the nations goals for energy

52

Uranium Processing Facility | Y-12 National Security Complex  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

About / Transforming Y-12 / Uranium Processing Facility About / Transforming Y-12 / Uranium Processing Facility Uranium Processing Facility UPF will be a state-of-the-art, consolidated facility for enriched uranium operations including assembly, disassembly, dismantlement, quality evaluation, and product certification. An integral part of Y-12's transformation efforts and a key component of the National Nuclear Security Administration's Uranium Center of Excellence, the Uranium Processing Facility is one of two facilities at Y-12 whose joint mission will be to accomplish the storage and processing of all enriched uranium in one much smaller, centralized area. Safety, security and flexibility are key design attributes of the facility, which is in the preliminary design phase of work. UPF will be built to modern standards and engage new technologies through a responsive and agile

53

Office of Headquarters Security Operations: Facility Clearance...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

The Office of Health, Safety and Security HSS Logo Department of Energy Seal Left Tab SEARCH Right Tab TOOLS Right Tab Left Tab HOME Right Tab Left Tab ABOUT US Right Tab Left Tab...

54

National Laser User Facilities Program | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

User Facilities Program | National Nuclear Security User Facilities Program | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog National Laser User Facilities Program Home > National Laser User Facilities Program National Laser User Facilities Program National Laser Users' Facility Grant Program Overview The Laboratory for Laser Energetics (LLE) at the University of Rochester

55

National Laser User Facilities Program | National Nuclear Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Laser User Facilities Program | National Nuclear Security Laser User Facilities Program | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog National Laser User Facilities Program Home > National Laser User Facilities Program National Laser User Facilities Program National Laser Users' Facility Grant Program Overview The Laboratory for Laser Energetics (LLE) at the University of Rochester

56

PROJECT MANGEMENT PLAN EXAMPLES Facility End State Decisions Examples  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Facility End State Decisions Examples Facility End State Decisions Examples Example 3 3.0 POST DEACTIVATION END STATE VISION The Heavy Water Facility is scheduled to cease moderator operations and commence final shutdown of moderator processing and processing support systems. The Heavy Water Facility and supporting facilities will be declared excess. Deactivation will place the facilities into a passively safe, minimal cost, long term S&M mode. At the end of the deactivation period, the facilities will be categorized "Radiological" and "Other Industrial Use". The following deactivation end state is envisioned: Moderator Processing and Moderator Storage Buildings The deactivation of the moderator processing and storage buildings will remove the moderator storage drums

57

Contained Firing Facility | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Home > About Us > Our Programs > Defense Programs > Office of Research, Development, Test Capabilities and Evaluation > Office of Research and Development > Facilities >...

58

National Ignition Facility | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Home > About Us > Our Programs > Defense Programs > Office of Research, Development, Test Capabilities and Evaluation > Office of Inertial Confinement Fusion > Facilities >...

59

Support Facilities | Y-12 National Security Complex  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

maintenance shops, waste management and storage facilities, guard portals and posts, cooling towers and chiller buildings - with an emphasis on sustainment, cost savings and...

60

NNSA Holds Groundbreaking at MOX Facility | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Groundbreaking at MOX Facility | National Nuclear Security Groundbreaking at MOX Facility | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Our History > NNSA Timeline > NNSA Holds Groundbreaking at MOX Facility NNSA Holds Groundbreaking at MOX Facility October 14, 2005 Aiken, SC NNSA Holds Groundbreaking at MOX Facility

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

National Laser Users' Facility Grant Program | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Users' Facility Grant Program | National Nuclear Security Users' Facility Grant Program | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog NLUF National Laser Users' Facility Grant Program Home > About Us > Our Programs > Defense Programs > Office of Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation > University Partnerships / Academic Alliances > National Laser Users' Facility Grant Program

62

Facility Software Quality Assurance for Capital Project Decisions RM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Facility Software Quality Assurance (SQA) for Facility Software Quality Assurance (SQA) for Capital Project Critical Decisions Review Module March 2010 OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Standard Review Plan (SRP) Facility Software Quality Assurance (SQA) for Capital Project Critical Decisions Review Module Critical Decision (CD) Applicability CD-0 CD-1 CD-2 CD-3 CD-4 Post Operation March 2010 Standard Review Plan, 2 nd Edition, March 2010 FOREWORD The Standard Review Plan (SRP) 1 provides a consistent, predictable corporate review framework to ensure that issues and risks that could challenge the success of Office of Environmental Management (EM) projects are identified early and addressed proactively. The internal EM project review process encompasses key milestones established by DOE O 413.3A, Change 1,

63

Performing Energy Security Assessments - A How-To Guide for Federal Facility Managers  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Performing Energy Security Assessments - Performing Energy Security Assessments - A How-To Guide for Federal Facility Managers ii Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ v 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Facilities to be Assessed...........................................................................................................................1 2. BEGINNING THE ENERGY SECURITY ASSESSMENT PROCESS ............................... 2 2.1 Assign an Energy Security Manager .........................................................................................................2 2.2 Define the Mission of the Installation

64

Performing Energy Security Assessments - A How-To Guide for Federal Facility Managers  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Performing Energy Security Assessments - Performing Energy Security Assessments - A How-To Guide for Federal Facility Managers ii Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ v 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Facilities to be Assessed...........................................................................................................................1 2. BEGINNING THE ENERGY SECURITY ASSESSMENT PROCESS ............................... 2 2.1 Assign an Energy Security Manager .........................................................................................................2 2.2 Define the Mission of the Installation

65

INDUSTRIAL CONTROL SYSTEM CYBER SECURITY: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS RELEVANT TO NUCLEAR FACILITIES, SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY  

SciTech Connect

Typical questions surrounding industrial control system (ICS) cyber security always lead back to: What could a cyber attack do to my system(s) and; how much should I worry about it? These two leading questions represent only a fraction of questions asked when discussing cyber security as it applies to any program, company, business, or organization. The intent of this paper is to open a dialog of important pertinent questions and answers that managers of nuclear facilities engaged in nuclear facility security and safeguards should examine, i.e., what questions should be asked; and how do the answers affect an organization's ability to effectively safeguard and secure nuclear material. When a cyber intrusion is reported, what does that mean? Can an intrusion be detected or go un-noticed? Are nuclear security or safeguards systems potentially vulnerable? What about the digital systems employed in process monitoring, and international safeguards? Organizations expend considerable efforts to ensure that their facilities can maintain continuity of operations against physical threats. However, cyber threats particularly on ICSs may not be well known or understood, and often do not receive adequate attention. With the disclosure of the Stuxnet virus that has recently attacked nuclear infrastructure, many organizations have recognized the need for an urgent interest in cyber attacks and defenses against them. Several questions arise including discussions about the insider threat, adequate cyber protections, program readiness, encryption, and many more. These questions, among others, are discussed so as to raise the awareness and shed light on ways to protect nuclear facilities and materials against such attacks.

Robert S. Anderson; Mark Schanfein; Trond Bjornard; Paul Moskowitz

2011-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

66

Your attention please: designing security-decision UIs to make genuine risks harder to ignore  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

We designed and tested attractors for computer security dialogs: user-interface modifications used to draw users' attention to the most important information for making decisions. Some of these modifications were purely visual, while others temporarily ... Keywords: attractors, dialogs, habituation, methodologies, usable security, warnings

Cristian Bravo-Lillo; Saranga Komanduri; Lorrie Faith Cranor; Robert W. Reeder; Manya Sleeper; Julie Downs; Stuart Schechter

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

67

Design of the Uranium Storage Facility at the Y-12 National Security...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

In 1998, the Department of Energy determined that a new facility to store highly enriched uranium materials at the Y-12 National Security Complex was needed. The new facility...

68

NNSA Reaffirms Decision to Select Consolidated Nuclear Security...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > Media Room > Press Releases > NNSA Reaffirms Decision to Select Consolidated...

69

Secure Data Center (Fact Sheet), Energy Systems Integration Facility...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

engineering. Partners at the ESIF's Secure Data Center include: * Government agencies * Vehicle manufacturers * Transit agencies * Hydrogen suppliers * Fuel cell developers *...

70

A decision support system for secure information sharing  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In both the commercial and defense sectors a compelling need is emerging for highly dynamic, yet risk optimized, sharing of information across traditional organizational boundaries. Risk optimal decisions to disseminate mission critical tactical intelligence ... Keywords: description logic, flexible information sharing, justification for non-shareability, semantic reasoner

Achille Fokoue; Mudhakar Srivatsa; Pankaj Rohatgi; Peter Wrobel; John Yesberg

2009-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

71

Decision Support Facility for the APS Control System  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The Advanced Photon Source is now in its fifth year of routine beam production. The EPICS-based [1] control system has entered the phase in its life cycle where new control algorithms must be implemented under increasingly stringent operational and reliability requirements. The sheer volume of the control system (~270,000 records, ~145 VME-based input-output controllers (IOCs), and ~7,000,000 lines of EPICS ASCII configuration code), presents a daunting challenge for code maintenance. The present work describes a relational database that provides an integrated view of the interacting components of the entire APS control system, including the IOC low-level logic, the physical wiring documentation, and high-level client applications. The database is extracted (booted) from the same operational CVS repository as that used to load the active IOCs. It provides site-wide decision support facilities to inspect and trace control flow and to identify client (e.g., user interface) programs involved at any selected poin...

Dohan, D A

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

72

DOE/DHS INDUSTRIAL CONTROL SYSTEM CYBER SECURITY PROGRAMS: A MODEL FOR USE IN NUCLEAR FACILITY SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY  

SciTech Connect

Many critical infrastructure sectors have been investigating cyber security issues for several years especially with the help of two primary government programs. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National SCADA Test Bed and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Control Systems Security Program have both implemented activities aimed at securing the industrial control systems that operate the North American electric grid along with several other critical infrastructure sectors (ICS). These programs have spent the last seven years working with industry including asset owners, educational institutions, standards and regulating bodies, and control system vendors. The programs common mission is to provide outreach, identification of cyber vulnerabilities to ICS and mitigation strategies to enhance security postures. The success of these programs indicates that a similar approach can be successfully translated into other sectors including nuclear operations, safeguards, and security. The industry regulating bodies have included cyber security requirements and in some cases, have incorporated sets of standards with penalties for non-compliance such as the North American Electric Reliability Corporation Critical Infrastructure Protection standards. These DOE and DHS programs that address security improvements by both suppliers and end users provide an excellent model for nuclear facility personnel concerned with safeguards and security cyber vulnerabilities and countermeasures. It is not a stretch to imagine complete surreptitious collapse of protection against the removal of nuclear material or even initiation of a criticality event as witnessed at Three Mile Island or Chernobyl in a nuclear ICS inadequately protected against the cyber threat.

Robert S. Anderson; Mark Schanfein; Trond Bjornard; Paul Moskowitz

2011-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

73

Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility | Y-12 National Security...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Highly Enriched Uranium ... Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility HEUMF The Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility is our nation's central repository for highly enriched...

74

Tag: uranium processing facility | Y-12 National Security Complex  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Facility project has received approval to begin field work. More... Category: News From aging infrastructure to the unaparalleled UPF The proposed Uranium Processing Facility...

75

Headquarters Security Operations Facility Clearance and Approval Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Headquarters Facility Clearance and Approval Program (FCAP) is established by DOE Order to administratively determine that a facility is or is not eligible to access, receive, produce, use, and...

76

EM Issues Amended Decision to Expand Use of Nuclear Facility | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Issues Amended Decision to Expand Use of Nuclear Facility Issues Amended Decision to Expand Use of Nuclear Facility EM Issues Amended Decision to Expand Use of Nuclear Facility April 1, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis H-Canyon at Savannah River Site. The building is called a canyon because of its long rectangular shape and two continuous trenches that contains process vessels. H-Canyon at Savannah River Site. The building is called a canyon because of its long rectangular shape and two continuous trenches that contains process vessels. AIKEN, S.C. - EM issued an amended Record of Decision (ROD) to the Savannah River Site (SRS) Spent Nuclear Fuel Environmental Impact Statement to expand the operations of the H-Canyon Facility at SRS to support a major nuclear non-proliferation goal and save taxpayer dollars. DOE recently signed a contract allowing Atomic Energy of Canada Limited

77

EM Issues Amended Decision to Expand Use of Nuclear Facility | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EM Issues Amended Decision to Expand Use of Nuclear Facility EM Issues Amended Decision to Expand Use of Nuclear Facility EM Issues Amended Decision to Expand Use of Nuclear Facility April 1, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis H-Canyon at Savannah River Site. The building is called a canyon because of its long rectangular shape and two continuous trenches that contains process vessels. H-Canyon at Savannah River Site. The building is called a canyon because of its long rectangular shape and two continuous trenches that contains process vessels. AIKEN, S.C. - EM issued an amended Record of Decision (ROD) to the Savannah River Site (SRS) Spent Nuclear Fuel Environmental Impact Statement to expand the operations of the H-Canyon Facility at SRS to support a major nuclear non-proliferation goal and save taxpayer dollars. DOE recently signed a contract allowing Atomic Energy of Canada Limited

78

Multi criteria analyses for managing motorway company facilities: The decision support system SINERGIE  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Improvements to the decision-making process in the areas of preventive maintenance and facility repairs for a range of infrastructure include maintenance, upgrading and retrofitting operations. Depending on the available information concerning the condition ...

Jacky Montmain; Cline Sanchez; Marc Vinches

2009-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

79

Facility Operations and User Support | National Nuclear Security...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Above image: Red Storm supercomputer at Sandia National LaboratoriesNew Mexico. (Sandia National Laboratories) This sub-program provides both necessary physical facility and...

80

Assessment of Nuclear Safety Culture at the Y-12 National Security Complex Urnaium Processing Facility Project, June 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Y-12 National Security Complex Y-12 National Security Complex Uranium Processing Facility Project May 2011 June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Independent Oversight Assessment of Safety Culture at the Y-12 National Security Complex Uranium Processing Facility Project Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Scope and Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 Results and Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 3

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Assessment of Nuclear Safety Culture at the Y-12 National Security Complex Urnaium Processing Facility Project, June 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Y-12 National Security Complex Y-12 National Security Complex Uranium Processing Facility Project May 2011 June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Independent Oversight Assessment of Safety Culture at the Y-12 National Security Complex Uranium Processing Facility Project Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Scope and Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 Results and Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 3

82

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Review at the Nevada National Security Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NNSS-2011-001 NNSS-2011-001 Site: Nevada National Security Site Subject: Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Activity Report for the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Review at the Nevada National Security Site Dates of Activity 02/14/2011 - 02/17/2011 Report Preparer William Macon Activity Description/Purpose: The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), visited the Nevada Site Office (NSO) and the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) from February 14-17, 2011. The purpose of the visit was to observe the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) review and maintain operational awareness of NNSS activities. Result:

83

: The Resumption of Criticality Experiments Facility Operations at the Nevada National Security Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Resumption of Criticality Resumption of Criticality Experiments Facility Operations at the Nevada National Security Site OAS-M-13-09 September 2013 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 30, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRINCIPAL DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM: George W. Collard Assistant Inspector General for Audits Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The Resumption of Criticality Experiments Facility Operations at the Nevada National Security Site" BACKGROUND The mission of the Criticality Experiments Facility, located at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (Los Alamos) was to conduct nuclear criticality experiments and hands-on training in nuclear safeguards, criticality safety and emergency response in support of the National

84

Towards an Experimental Testbed Facility for Cyber-Physical Security Research  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) are under great scrutiny due to large Smart Grid investments and recent high profile security vulnerabilities and attacks. Research into improved security technologies, communication models, and emergent behavior is necessary to protect these systems from sophisticated adversaries and new risks posed by the convergence of CPSs with IT equipment. However, cyber-physical security research is limited by the lack of access to universal cyber-physical testbed facilities that permit flexible, high-fidelity experiments. This paper presents a remotely-configurable and community-accessible testbed design that integrates elements from the virtual, simulated, and physical environments. Fusing data between the three environments enables the creation of realistic and scalable environments where new functionality and ideas can be exercised. This novel design will enable the research community to analyze and evaluate the security of current environments and design future, secure, cyber-physical technologies.

Edgar, Thomas W.; Manz, David O.; Carroll, Thomas E.

2012-01-07T23:59:59.000Z

85

DOE | Office of Health, Safety and Security | 2012 Facility Representative,  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Facility Representative Facility Representative Office of Nuclear Safety Home Facility Representative Home Annual Facility Rep Workshop › 2012 › 2011 › 2010 › 2009 › 2008 › 2007 › 2006 › 2005 › 2004 › 2003 › 2002 › 2001 › 2000 DOE Safety Links › ORPS Info › Operating Experience › DOE Lessons Learned › Accident Investigation Assessment Tools › FR CRADs › Surveillance Guides › Manager's Guide for Safety and Health Subject Matter Links General Program Information › Program Mission Statement › Program Directives and Guidance › FR of the Year Award Program › FR of the Year Award › FR Program Assessment Guide (Appendix B, DOE STD 1063-2011) FR Quarterly Performance Indicators Training & Qualification Information › Qualification Standards › Energy Online Courses

86

When Do Their Casualties Count? Exploring Wartime Decisions that Pit Security Against Harm  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This dissertation offers a new understanding about wartime decision making in the face of likely, but unintended, harm to foreign civilians. It empirically identifies conditions under which leaders in democratic nations are more or less likely to choose to attack a target when confronted with a dilemma between pursuing national security objectives and avoiding civilian casualties. An innovative targeting decision model was constructed that described both the theorized structure of the decisions inputs and the process by which these inputs are assembled into a choice. The model went beyond the normal target benefit and civilian casualty cost considerations of proportionality to also include the contextual input of prospect frame. Decision makers were expected to address the same benefit and cost differently depending on whether they were winning or losing the conflict. This was because the prospect frame would influence their risk attitudes, as predicted by prospect theory. This model was then tested via two decision-making experiments that used military officers and defense civilians as participants. Additionally, a statistical analysis of data collected from an extended period of the second Intifada was done to seek evidence that the model also applied in actual wartime decision making. All three tests supported portions of the targeting decision model. Higher target benefit and lower civilian casualty estimates increased support for the planned attack. Prospect frame influenced decisions in the cases where both target value and the civilian casualty estimates were high and the resulting dilemma was very difficult. In these situations, those told that their forces were losing the conflict were less sensitive to humanitarian harm and more likely to support the attack than when they were told their side was winning. Furthermore, the Intifada data analysis of attacks approved by Israeli officials against Palestinians found this same effect of prospect frame held generally across all six years of observations.

Roblyer, Dwight Andrew

2009-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

87

Facilities  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Facilities Facilities Facilities LANL's mission is to develop and apply science and technology to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. nuclear deterrent; reduce global threats; and solve other emerging national security and energy challenges. Contact Operator Los Alamos National Laboratory (505) 667-5061 Some LANL facilities are available to researchers at other laboratories, universities, and industry. Unique facilities foster experimental science, support LANL's security mission DARHT accelerator DARHT's electron accelerators use large, circular aluminum structures to create magnetic fields that focus and steer a stream of electrons down the length of the accelerator. Tremendous electrical energy is added along the way. When the stream of high-speed electrons exits the accelerator it is

88

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 570: Area 9 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report presents information supporting the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 570: Area 9 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada. This complies with the requirements of the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) that was agreed to by the State of Nevada; U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Environmental Management; U.S. Department of Defense; and DOE, Legacy Management. The purpose of the CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed.

Matthews, Patrick

2013-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

89

Security  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Security. Organizations need standards, guidelines, and ... to support health IT implementations. HIPAA Security Rule Toolkit. ...

2011-12-05T23:59:59.000Z

90

Headquarters Security Operations | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Headquarters Security Operations Headquarters Security Operations Headquarters Security Operations Mission The Office of Headquarters Security Operations strengthens national security by protecting personnel, facilities, property, classified information, and sensitive unclassified information for DOE Headquarters facilities in the National Capital Area under normal and abnormal (i.e., emergency) conditions; managing access authorization functions; ensuring that executives and dignitaries are fully protected, and supporting efforts to ensure the continuity of government in all circumstances as mandated by Presidential Decision Directive. The Office is the database owner for the principal personnel security information processing activities of the Department and personnel security administrative review process.

91

Report on emergency electrical power supply systems for nuclear fuel cycle and reactor facilities security systems  

SciTech Connect

The report includes information that will be useful to those responsible for the planning, design and implementation of emergency electric power systems for physical security and special nuclear materials accountability systems. Basic considerations for establishing the system requirements for emergency electric power for security and accountability operations are presented. Methods of supplying emergency power that are available at present and methods predicted to be available in the future are discussed. The characteristics of capacity, cost, safety, reliability and environmental and physical facility considerations of emergency electric power techniques are presented. The report includes basic considerations for the development of a system concept and the preparation of a detailed system design.

1977-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

92

The Joint Actinide Shock Physics Experimental Research Facility at the Nevada National Security Site, OAS-L-12-05  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Joint Actinide Shock Physics Joint Actinide Shock Physics Experimental Research Facility at the Nevada National Security Site OAS-L-12-05 April 2012 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 April 23, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, NEVADA SITE OFFICE FROM: David Sedillo, Director Western Audits Division Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The Joint Actinide Shock Physics Experimental Research Facility at the Nevada National Security Site" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's, Joint Actinide Shock Physics Experimental Research (JASPER) facility plays an integral role in the certification of the Nation's nuclear weapons stockpile by providing a method to generate and measure data

93

Facility Energy Decision System (FEDS) Assessment Report for Fort Buchanan, Puerto Rico  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report documents the findings of the Facility Energy Decision System (FEDS) assessment at Fort Buchanan, Puerto Rico, by a team of PNNL engineers under contract to the Installation Management Agency (IMA) Southeast Region Office (SERO). Funding support was also provided by the Department of Energy's Federal Energy Management Program. The purpose of the assessment was to determine how energy is consumed at Fort Buchanan, identify the most cost-effective energy retrofit measures, and calculate the potential energy and cost savings.

Chvala, William D.; Solana, Amy E.; Dixon, Douglas R.

2005-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

94

Facility Energy Decision System (FEDS) Assessment Report for US Army Garrison, Japan - Honshu Installations  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report documents an assessment was performed by a team of engineers from Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) under contract to the Installation Management Command (IMCOM) Pacific Region Office (PARO). The effort used the Facility Energy Decision System (FEDS) model to determine how energy is consumed at five U.S. Army Garrison-Japan (USAG-J) installations in the Honshu area, identify the most cost-effective energy retrofit measures, and calculate the potential energy and cost savings.

Kora, Angela R.; Brown, Daryl R.; Dixon, Douglas R.

2010-03-09T23:59:59.000Z

95

Materials and Security Consolidation Complex Facilities Radioactive Waste Management Basis and DOE Manual 435.1-1 Compliance Tables  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Department of Energy Order 435.1, 'Radioactive Waste Management,' along with its associated manual and guidance, requires development and maintenance of a radioactive waste management basis for each radioactive waste management facility, operation, and activity. This document presents a radioactive waste management basis for Idaho National Laboratory's Materials and Security Consolidation Center facilities that manage radioactive waste. The radioactive waste management basis for a facility comprises existing laboratory-wide and facility-specific documents. Department of Energy Manual 435.1-1, 'Radioactive Waste Management Manual,' facility compliance tables also are presented for the facilities. The tables serve as a tool for developing the radioactive waste management basis.

Not Listed

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

96

The Use of Staff Augmentation Subcontracts at the National Nuclear Security Administration's Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility, IG-0887  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

The Use of Staff Augmentation The Use of Staff Augmentation Subcontracts at National Nuclear Security Administration's Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility DOE/IG-0887 May 2013 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 May 15, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The Use of Staff Augmentation Subcontracts at the National Nuclear Security Administration's Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility" BACKGROUND Shaw AREVA MOX Services, LLC (MOX Services) is responsible for the design and construction of the National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) nearly $5 billion Mixed

97

Securing Operating Data From Passive Safety Tests at the Fast Flux Test Facility  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) is the most recent Liquid Metal Reactor (LMR) to operate in the United States, from 1982 to 1992. The technologies employed in designing and constructing this reactor, along with information obtained from tests conducted during its operation, are currently being secured and archived by the Department of Energys Office of Nuclear Energy Fuel Cycle Research and Development Program. This report is one in a series documenting the overall project efforts to retrieve and preserve critical information related to advanced reactors. A previous report summarized the initial efforts to review, retrieve and preserve the most salient documents related to Passive Safety Testing (PST) in the FFTF. Efforts continue to locate, secure, and retrieve record copies of original plant data tapes for the series of passive safety tests conducted between 1986 and 1991.

Wootan, David W.; Omberg, Ronald P.; Makenas, Bruce J.; Nielsen, Deborah L.; Nelson, Joseph V.; Polzin, David L.

2011-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

98

Securing Operating Data From Passive Safety Tests at the Fast Flux Test Facility  

SciTech Connect

The Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) is the most recent Liquid Metal Reactor (LMR) to operate in the United States, from 1982 to 1992. The technologies employed in designing and constructing this reactor, along with information obtained from tests conducted during its operation, are currently being secured and archived by the Department of Energy's Office of Nuclear Energy Fuel Cycle Research and Development Program. This report is one in a series documenting the overall project efforts to retrieve and preserve critical information related to advanced reactors. A previous report summarized the initial efforts to review, retrieve and preserve the most salient documents related to Passive Safety Testing (PST) in the FFTF. Efforts continue to locate, secure, and retrieve record copies of original plant data tapes for the series of passive safety tests conducted between 1986 and 1991.

Wootan, David W.; Omberg, Ronald P.; Makenas, Bruce J.; Nielsen, Deborah L.; Nelson, Joseph V.; Polzin, David L.

2011-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

99

Facility Targeting, Protection and Mission Decision Making Using the VISAC Code  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Visual Interactive Site Analysis Code (VISAC) is a Java-based graphical expert system developed by ORNL for the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and other sponsors to aid in targeting facilities and to predict the associated collateral effects for the go, no go mission decision making process. VISAC integrates the three concepts of target geometric modeling, damage assessment capabilities, and an event/fault tree methodology for evaluating accident/incident consequences. It can analyze a variety of accidents/incidents at nuclear or industrial facilities, ranging from simple component sabotage to an attack with military or terroist weapons. For nuclear facilities, VISAC predicts the facility damage, estimated downtime, amount and timing of any radionuclides released. used in conunction with DTRA's HPAC code, VISAC also can analyze transport and dispersion of the radionuclides, levels of contamination of the surrounding area, and the population at risk. VISAC has also been used by the NRC to aid in the development of protective measures for nuclear facilities that may be subjected to attacks by car/truck bombs.

Morris, Robert Howard [ORNL; Sulfredge, Charles David [ORNL

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

100

Dealer Financial Conditions and the Term Securities Lending Facility: Was Bagehot Right After All? *  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Do central bank lender-of-last-resort (LOLR) facilities elicit greater and more aggressive participation from less capitalized financial firms? We answer this question by examining financial conditions of dealers that participated in the Federal Reserve?s Term Securities Lending Facility (TSLF), a LOLR facility that provided liquidity against a range of assets during 2008-09. We find that, in the cross-section, dealers with more leverage and lower equity returns prior to a TSLF auction were more likely to participate in the auction and bid more aggressively (i.e., bid more and at higher bidding rates). These effects were stronger for auctions that allowed tendering of more illiquid collateral. We find some support for reluctance of firms to participate given a lack of participation in earlier auctions, but such stigma does not fully explain the effect of leverage in inducing greater participation. Our results suggest the importance of considering solvency concerns of banks when designing LOLR facilities during times of aggregate liquidity shortages.

Viral V Acharya; Michael J. Fleming; Federal Reserve; Bank New York; Asani Sarkar; Federal Reserve; Bank New York

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Office of Headquarters Security Operations | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Headquarters Security Headquarters Security Operations Office of Headquarters Security Operations Mission The Office of Headquarters Security Operations strengthens national security by protecting personnel, facilities, property, classified information, and sensitive unclassified information for DOE Headquarters facilities in the National Capital Area under normal and abnormal (i.e., emergency) conditions; managing access authorization functions; ensuring that executives and dignitaries are fully protected, and supporting efforts to ensure the continuity of government in all circumstances as mandated by Presidential Decision Directive. The Office is the database owner for the principal personnel security information processing activities of the Department and personnel security administrative review process.

102

The use of management science techniques to improve decision making in poultry processing facilities  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The growth of the poultry industry into a major meat producing agribusiness has caused poultry processing facilities to evolve into major complexes that rely increasingly on machinery to process mass numbers of chicken carcasses. This results in a less flexible environment in which production decisions are made. A software system has been developed to meet these challenges. Parts Pro utilizes its model builder (MB) component to gather statistical and genetic information about the poultry flock to develop a mathematical model representing the constraints of the facility, as well as the request of the decision maker. This information is delivered to the second component, the model solder (MS) which is responsible for solving the mathematical model. Three experiments were conducted to determine if PartsPro was capable of representing a poultry processing facility. In Experiment 1 , genetic information from four different strains of broilers (A,B,C,D), was used in combination with the incrementally increased profits of white and dark meat final products to determine the effects of prices and strain cross on final product. A composite-base control trial was run using a composite average of the strain cross data and base final product prices. Strain cross A combined with 20% increases in white meat final products offered the highest profit of any combinations. Experiment 2 was conducted to determine if the system was capable of accommodating user made production decisions. Final profits and final product mixes were compared to a composite-base run that was the average genetic yields of all strain crosses, and base prices of final products. The system altered cut-up means to accommodate the production of requested products. Final trial profits were less than the composite-base trial. Experiment 3 was conducted to determine the system's sensitivity to price changes of unproduced products. A nearly 60% increase in price of the unproduced product caused the system to alter final product mix. Total profit of the newly altered product mix was less than the composite-base trial. This research demonstrates that management science techniques can be applied successfully to aid decision making in a poultry processing facility.

Conrad, Kenneth Allen

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

103

Firms' information security investment decisions: Stock market evidence of investors' behavior  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In the information society, it is important for firms to manage their core information resources securely. However, the difficulty of measuring the return on an IT security investment is one of the critical obstacles for firms in making such investment ... Keywords: Abnormal returns, Event methodology, Information security investment, Investors' behavior, Market value, Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)

Sangmi Chai; Minkyun Kim; H. Raghav Rao

2011-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

104

Record of Decision for the Electrical Interconnection of the COB Energy Facility (DOE/EIS-0343) (08/20/04)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

COB Energy Facility COB Energy Facility DECISION The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has decided to offer contract terms for interconnection of the COB Energy Facility with the Federal Columbia River Transmission System (FCRTS), as proposed in the COB Energy Facility Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) (DOE/EIS-0343, June 2004). Proposed by Peoples Energy Resources Company (PERC), the COB Energy Facility involves constructing and operating a new 1,160- megawatt (MW) natural gas-fired, combined-cycle power generation facility at a 50.6-acre site near Bonanza in Klamath County, Oregon, and a 7.2-mile-long 500-kilovolt (kV) transmission line south to BPA's Captain Jack Substation. A Generation Interconnection Agreement with PERC would provide for interconnection of the COB Energy Facility with the FCRTS and

105

National Security Initiatives | ORNL  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Bioinformatics Facilities Events and Conferences Supporting Organizations National Security Home | Science & Discovery | National Security | Initiatives SHARE National...

106

The National Criticality Experiments Research Center at the Device Assembly Facility, Nevada National Security Site: Status and Capabilities, Summary Report  

SciTech Connect

The National Criticality Experiments Research Center (NCERC) was officially opened on August 29, 2011. Located within the Device Assembly Facility (DAF) at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS), the NCERC has become a consolidation facility within the United States for critical configuration testing, particularly those involving highly enriched uranium (HEU). The DAF is a Department of Energy (DOE) owned facility that is operated by the National Nuclear Security Agency/Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO). User laboratories include the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). Personnel bring their home lab qualifications and procedures with them to the DAF, such that non-site specific training need not be repeated to conduct work at DAF. The NNSS Management and Operating contractor is National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec) and the NNSS Safeguards and Security contractor is Wackenhut Services. The complete report provides an overview and status of the available laboratories and test bays at NCERC, available test materials and test support configurations, and test requirements and limitations for performing sub-critical and critical tests. The current summary provides a brief summary of the facility status and the method by which experiments may be introduced to NCERC.

S. Bragg-Sitton; J. Bess; J. Werner

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

107

Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers OCTOBER 2011 Fuel Cell Technologies Program Oak Ridge National Laboratory 2 October 2011 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily

108

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 22, 2012 August 22, 2012 PSH-12-0065 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is a contractor employee at a DOE facility. Exhibit (Ex.) 10 at 3. The Local Security Office (LSO) discovered that the Individual failed to list a 2004 Driving Under the Influence (DUI) arrest in a Questionnaire for National Security Positions form completed in October 2011. Ex. 10 at 10. August 22, 2012 PSH-12-0045 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an Individual's DOE security clearance should be restored. The Individual had been caught viewing pornography on a DOE workplace computer. August 17, 2012 PSH-12-0048 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an

109

Procuring Stationary Fuel Cells For CHP: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Federal agency leaders are expressing growing interest in using innovative fuel cell combined heat and power (CHP) technology at their sites, motivated by both executive branch sustainability targets and a desire to lead by example in the transition to a clean energy economy. Fuel cell CHP can deliver reliable electricity and heat with 70% to 85% efficiency. Implementing this technology can be a high efficiency, clean energy solution for agencies striving to meet ambitious sustainability requirements with limited budgets. Fuel cell CHP systems can use natural gas or renewable fuels, such as biogas. Procuring Stationary Fuel Cells for CHP: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers presents an overview of the process for planning and implementing a fuel cell CHP project in a concise, step-by-step format. This guide is designed to help agency leaders turn their interest in fuel cell technology into successful installations. This guide concentrates on larger (100 kW and greater) fuel cell CHP systems and does not consider other fuel cell applications such as cars, forklifts, backup power supplies or small generators (<100 kW). Because fuel cell technologies are rapidly evolving and have high up front costs, their deployment poses unique challenges. The electrical and thermal output of the CHP system must be integrated with the building s energy systems. Innovative financing mechanisms allow agencies to make a make versus buy decision to maximize savings. This guide outlines methods that federal agencies may use to procure fuel cell CHP systems with little or no capital investment. Each agency and division, however, has its own set of procurement procedures. This guide was written as a starting point, and it defers to the reader s set of rules if differences exist. The fuel cell industry is maturing, and project developers are gaining experience in working with federal agencies. Technology improvements, cost reductions, and experienced project developers are making fuel cell projects easier to put into service. In this environment, federal decision makers can focus on being smart buyers of fuel cell energy instead of attempting to become experts in fuel cell technology. For agencies that want to pursue a fuel cell CHP this guide presents a four step process for a successful project. 1. Perform a preliminary screening of the energy needs energy costs and incentives. 2. Compare a detailed project plan. 3. Make a financing and contracting decision. 4. Execute the project plan including financing, installation, and operation. The simplest procurement method is designated funding for the outright purchase of the fuel cell CHP system, although this is usually not the most cost-effective option. This guide describes the following financing options: Power purchase agreement Energy savings performance contract Utility energy services contract Enhanced use lease Fuel cell CHP technology can help federal facility managers comply with agency objectives for reducing energy consumption and air pollution emissions. Fuel cells do not generate particulate pollutants, unburned hydrocarbons or the gases that produce acid rain. Fuel cells emit less carbon dioxide (CO2) than other, less efficient technologies and use of renewable fuels can make them carbon neutral. Fuel cell CHP technology can deliver reliable electricity and heat with high efficiency (70% to 85%) in a small physical footprint with little noise, making it a cost-effective option for federal facilities.

Stinton, David P [ORNL; McGervey, Joseph [SRA International, Inc.; Curran, Scott [ORNL

2011-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

110

Integration of sensing and computing in an intelligent decision support system for homeland security defense  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

We propose an intelligent decision support system based on sensor and computer networks that incorporates various component techniques for sensor deployment, data routing, distributed computing, and information fusion. The integrated system is deployed ... Keywords: Data routing, Distributed computing, Dynamic programming, Intelligent decision support system, Sensor deployment, Sensor fusion

Qishi Wu; Mengxia Zhu; Nageswara S. V. Rao

2009-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

111

Office of Security Operations: Mission and Functions  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Mission and Functions Mission and Functions Mission The Office of Headquarters Security Operations strengthens national security by protecting personnel, facilities, property, classified information, and sensitive unclassified information for DOE Headquarters facilities in the National Capital Area under normal and abnormal (i.e., emergency) conditions; managing access authorization functions; ensuring that executives and dignitaries are fully protected, and supporting efforts to ensure the continuity of government in all circumstances as mandated by Presidential Decision Directive. The Office is the database owner for the principal personnel security information processing activities of the Department and personnel security administrative review process. Functions

112

Probabilistic Risk Based Decision Support for Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Facilities in Sensitive Ecosystems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report describes work performed during the initial period of the project Probabilistic Risk Based Decision Support for Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Facilities in Sensitive Ecosystems. The specific region that is within the scope of this study is the Fayetteville Shale Play. This is an unconventional, tight formation, natural gas play that currently has approximately 1.5 million acres under lease, primarily to Southwestern Energy Incorporated and Chesapeake Energy Incorporated. The currently active play encompasses a region from approximately Fort Smith, AR east to Little Rock, AR approximately 50 miles wide (from North to South). The initial estimates for this field put it almost on par with the Barnett Shale play in Texas. It is anticipated that thousands of wells will be drilled during the next several years; this will entail installation of massive support infrastructure of roads and pipelines, as well as drilling fluid disposal pits and infrastructure to handle millions of gallons of fracturing fluids. This project focuses on gas production in Arkansas as the test bed for application of proactive risk management decision support system for natural gas exploration and production. The activities covered in this report include meetings with representative stakeholders, development of initial content and design for an educational web site, and development and preliminary testing of an interactive mapping utility designed to provide users with information that will allow avoidance of sensitive areas during the development of the Fayetteville Shale Play. These tools have been presented to both regulatory and industrial stakeholder groups, and their feedback has been incorporated into the project.

Thoma, Greg; Veil, John; Limp, Fred; Cothren, Jackson; Gorham, Bruce; Williamson, Malcolm; Smith, Peter; Sullivan, Bob

2009-10-27T23:59:59.000Z

113

Probabilistic Risk Based Decision Support for Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Facilities in Sensitive Ecosystems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report describes work performed during the initial period of the project 'Probabilistic Risk Based Decision Support for Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Facilities in Sensitive Ecosystems.' The specific region that is within the scope of this study is the Fayetteville Shale Play. This is an unconventional, tight formation, natural gas play that currently has approximately 1.5 million acres under lease, primarily to Southwestern Energy Incorporated and Chesapeake Energy Incorporated. The currently active play encompasses a region from approximately Fort Smith, AR east to Little Rock, AR approximately 50 miles wide (from North to South). The initial estimates for this field put it almost on par with the Barnett Shale play in Texas. It is anticipated that thousands of wells will be drilled during the next several years; this will entail installation of massive support infrastructure of roads and pipelines, as well as drilling fluid disposal pits and infrastructure to handle millions of gallons of fracturing fluids. This project focuses on gas production in Arkansas as the test bed for application of proactive risk management decision support system for natural gas exploration and production. The activities covered in this report include meetings with representative stakeholders, development of initial content and design for an educational web site, and development and preliminary testing of an interactive mapping utility designed to provide users with information that will allow avoidance of sensitive areas during the development of the Fayetteville Shale Play. These tools have been presented to both regulatory and industrial stakeholder groups, and their feedback has been incorporated into the project.

Greg Thoma; John Veil; Fred Limp; Jackson Cothren; Bruce Gorham; Malcolm Williamson; Peter Smith; Bob Sullivan

2009-05-31T23:59:59.000Z

114

Security | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Security Security Security Security program under Office of Health, Safety and Security developes security policy, provides security expertise to assist field elements in planning site protection strategies and coordinates with domestic authorities to provide safeguards and security technical assistance, technical systems support, and technology development and deployment opportunities. Departmental Personnel Security, also ensures that Departmental personnel security programs (included the National Nuclear Security Administration) are consistent and effectively implemented. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan The purpose of the Headquarters Facility Master Security Plan (HQFMSP) is to inform employees, contractors, and visitors of the security procedures

115

Transportation security decision support system for emergency response: A training prototype  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

During emergencies, decision making is a challenging task requiring immediate and effective action from responders under the pressures of incomplete and erroneous information. Identification of appropriate resources and personnel, proper lines of communication, ... Keywords: Computer-based training, Mock drills, Organizational learning

S. W. Yoon; J. D. Velasquez; B. K. Partridge; S. Y. Nof

2008-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

116

Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 116: Area 25 Test Cell C Facility, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada  

SciTech Connect

This Closure Report (CR) presents information supporting closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 116, Area 25 Test Cell C Facility. This CR complies with the requirements of the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) that was agreed to by the State of Nevada; the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Environmental Management; the U.S. Department of Defense; and DOE, Legacy Management (FFACO, 1996 [as amended March 2010]). CAU 116 consists of the following two Corrective Action Sites (CASs), located in Area 25 of the Nevada National Security Site: (1) CAS 25-23-20, Nuclear Furnace Piping and (2) CAS 25-41-05, Test Cell C Facility. CAS 25-41-05 consisted of Building 3210 and the attached concrete shield wall. CAS 25-23-20 consisted of the nuclear furnace piping and tanks. Closure activities began in January 2007 and were completed in August 2011. Activities were conducted according to Revision 1 of the Streamlined Approach for Environmental Restoration Plan for CAU 116 (U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office [NNSA/NSO], 2008). This CR provides documentation supporting the completed corrective actions and provides data confirming that closure objectives for CAU 116 were met. Site characterization data and process knowledge indicated that surface areas were radiologically contaminated above release limits and that regulated and/or hazardous wastes were present in the facility.

NSTec Environmental Restoration

2011-09-29T23:59:59.000Z

117

Record of Decision for the Electrical Interconnection of the Chehalis Generation Facility (DOE/EIS-0230)(5/17/01)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Bonneville Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Record of Decision for the Electrical Interconnection of the Chehalis Generation Facility May 2001 _______________________________________________________ SUMMARY Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has decided to offer contracts for integrating power from the Chehalis Generation Facility (CGF) into the Federal Columbia River Transmission System (FCRTS). These contracts will facilitate integration of power from CGF into the FCRTS for delivery to the wholesale power market. In reaching this decision, I have considered the potential environmental impacts addressed in BPA's Resource Contingency Program Environmental Impact Statement (RCP EIS, DOE/EIS-0230, November 1995), Supplement Analysis (SA, DOE/EIS-0230/SA-02, May 9, 2001), BPA's Business Plan Environmental Impact Statement (BP EIS, DOE/EIS-

118

Geothermal heating retrofit at the Utah State Prison Minimum Security Facility. Final report, March 1979-January 1986  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report is a summary of progress and results of the Utah State Prison Geothermal Space Heating Project. Initiated in 1978 by the Utah State Energy Office and developed with assistance from DOE's Division of Geothermal and Hydropower Technologies PON program, final construction was completed in 1984. The completed system provides space and water heating for the State Prison's Minimum Security Facility. It consists of an artesian flowing geothermal well, plate heat exchangers, and underground distribution pipeline that connects to the existing hydronic heating system in the State Prison's Minimum Security Facility. Geothermal water disposal consists of a gravity drain line carrying spent geothermal water to a cooling pond which discharges into the Jordan River, approximately one mile from the well site. The system has been in operation for two years with mixed results. Continuing operation and maintenance problems have reduced the expected seasonal operation from 9 months per year to 3 months. Problems with the Minimum Security heating system have reduced the expected energy contribution by approximately 60%. To date the system has saved the prison approximately $18,060. The total expenditure including resource assessment and development, design, construction, performance verification, and reporting is approximately $827,558.

Not Available

1986-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

119

Composite Data Products (CDPs) from the Hydrogen Secure Data Center (HSDC) at NREL's Energy Systems Integration Facility (ESIF)  

DOE Data Explorer (OSTI)

The Hydrogen Secure Data Center (HSDC) at NREL's Energy Systems Integration Facility (ESIF) plays a crucial role in NREL's independent, third-party analysis of hydrogen fuel cell technologies in real-world operation. NREL partners submit operational, maintenance, safety, and cost data to the HSDC on a regular basis. NREL's Technology Validation Team uses an internal network of servers, storage, computers, backup systems, and software to efficiently process raw data, complete quarterly analysis, and digest large amounts of time series data for data visualization. While the raw data are secured by NREL to protect commercially sensitive and proprietary information, individualized data analysis results are provided as detailed data products (DDPs) to the partners who supplied the data. Individual system, fleet, and site analysis results are aggregated into public results called composite data products (CDPs) that show the status and progress of the technology without identifying individual companies or revealing proprietary information. These CDPs are available from this NREL website: 1) Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicle and Infrastructure Learning Demonstration; 2) Early Fuel Cell Market Demonstrations; 3) Fuel Cell Technology Status [copied with editing from http://www.nrel.gov/hydrogen/facilities_secure_data_center.html].

120

Program Areas | National Security | ORNL  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Programs Initiatives Facilities Events and Conferences Supporting Organizations National Security Home | Science & Discovery | National Security | Program Areas SHARE Program...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Supporting Organizations | National Security | ORNL  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Initiatives Facilities Events and Conferences Supporting Organizations National Security Home | Science & Discovery | National Security | Supporting Organizations SHARE Supporting...

122

DOE O 5639.8A, Security of Foreign Intelligence Information and Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilities  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The order establishes responsibilities and authorities for protecting Foreign Intelligence Information (FII) and Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilities ...

1993-07-23T23:59:59.000Z

123

Record of Decision for the Electrical Interconnection of the Plymouth Generating Facility (DOE/EIS-0345)(10/14/03)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for the Electrical Interconnection of the Plymouth Generating Facility October 2003 THE DECISION The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has decided to implement the proposed action identified in the Plymouth Generating Facility (PGF) Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) (DOE/EIS-0345, June 2003). The PGF, which has been proposed by Plymouth Energy, LLC (Plymouth Energy), involves construction and operation of a 307-megawatt (MW) natural gas-fired, combined-cycle power generation facility on a 44.5-acre site 2 miles west of Plymouth in Benton County, Washington. Under the proposed action, BPA will offer contract terms for interconnection of the PGF into the Federal Columbia River Transmission System (FCRTS) at BPA's proposed McNary-John Day 500-kilovolt (kV) transmission line at a point approximately

124

Facilities  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environment Feature Stories Public Reading Room: Environmental Documents, Reports LANL Home Phonebook Calendar Video About Operational Excellence Facilities Facilities...

125

Cyber Security Recommendations for Digital I&C Systems Within Power Generation Facilities Unregulated by North American Electric Rel iability Corporation Critical Infrastructure Protection  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Fossil generating facilities represent a significant investment, as well as a primary source of revenue, for many electric utilities. The digital instrumentation and control (I&C) systems of these generation facilities are essential to their successful operations. As such, the security of digital I&C systems is fundamental to ensure continued, reliable production. It is therefore prudent to employ appropriate ...

2012-12-12T23:59:59.000Z

126

Facility Software Quality Assurance (SQA) for Captal Project Critical Decisions RM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The purpose of this Software Quality Assurance for Capital Project Critical Decision Review Module (SQA RM) is to identify, integrate, and clarify, in one EM document, the SQA performance...

127

Cyber Security Module  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Cyber Security Module Cyber security training is required for all facility users and must be submitted before or upon arrival at the GUV Center. System Requirements and Information...

128

Contaminant distributions at typical U.S. uranium milling facilities and their effect on remedial action decisions  

SciTech Connect

Past operations at uranium processing sites throughout the US have resulted in local contamination of soils and ground water by radionuclides, toxic metals, or both. Understanding the origin of contamination and how the constituents are distributed is a basic element for planning remedial action decisions. This report describes the radiological and nonradiological species found in ground water at a typical US uranium milling facility. The report will provide the audience with an understanding of the vast spectrum of contaminants that must be controlled in planning solutions to the long-term management of these waste materials.

Hamp, S. [USDOE Albuquerque Operations Office, NM (United States). Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Project Office; Jackson, T.J. [Geraghty and Miller, Inc., Albuquerque, NM (United States); Dotson, P.W. [Roy F. Weston, Inc., Albuquerque, NM (United States)

1995-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

129

SECURITY ASSESSMENTS: TOOLS FOR MEASURING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SECURITY CONTROLS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

SECURITY ASSESSMENTS: TOOLS FOR MEASURING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SECURITY CONTROLS Shirley Radack, Editor Computer Security Division Information Technology Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology The selection and implementation of security controls are critical decisions for protecting

130

Appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility Safety Basis Preliminary Safety Design Report Process at the Y-12 National Security Complex, May 2013  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Appraisal of the Appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility Safety Basis Preliminary Safety Design Report Process at the Y-12 National Security Complex May 2011 May 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U. S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background........................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Scope..................................................................................................................................................... 2

131

Appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility Safety Basis Preliminary Safety Design Report Process at the Y-12 National Security Complex, May 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Appraisal of the Appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility Safety Basis Preliminary Safety Design Report Process at the Y-12 National Security Complex May 2011 May 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U. S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background........................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Scope..................................................................................................................................................... 2

132

Paducah DUF6 Conversion Facility: Record of Decision: As Published in the Federal Register  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

54 54 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2004 / Notices accordance with the comprehensive set of DOE requirements and applicable regulatory requirements that have been established to protect public health and the environment. These requirements encompass a wide variety of areas, including radiation protection, facility design criteria, fire protection, emergency preparedness and response, and operational safety requirements. * Cylinder management activities will be conducted in accordance with applicable DOE safety and environmental requirements, including the Cylinder Management Plan. * Temporary impacts on air quality from fugitive dust emissions during reconstruction of cylinder yards or construction of any new facility will be controlled by the best available

133

Measurements at Los Alamos National Laboratory Plutonium Facility in Support of Global Security Mission Space  

SciTech Connect

The Los Alamos National Laboratory Plutonium Facility at Technical Area (TA) 55 is one of a few nuclear facilities in the United States where Research & Development measurements can be performed on Safeguards Category-I (CAT-I) quantities of nuclear material. This capability allows us to incorporate measurements of CAT-IV through CAT-I materials as a component of detector characterization campaigns and training courses conducted at Los Alamos. A wider range of measurements can be supported. We will present an overview of recent measurements conducted in support of nuclear emergency response, nuclear counterterrorism, and international and domestic safeguards. This work was supported by the NNSA Office of Counterterrorism.

Stange, Sy [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Mayo, Douglas R. [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Herrera, Gary D. [Los Alamos National Laboratory; McLaughlin, Anastasia D. [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Montoya, Charles M. [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Quihuis, Becky A. [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Trujillo, Julio B. [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Van Pelt, Craig E. [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Wenz, Tracy R. [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2012-07-13T23:59:59.000Z

134

Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility How the Jaguar supercomputer helps assure America's energy security  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

on Theory and Experiment (INCITE) program, jointly managed by Leadership Computing Facilities at Oak Ridge works best before they build. Reduce nuclear waste. One way to reduce nuclear waste is to fuel a fast reactor with it. But the enormous expense of experiments has slowed development of a commercially viable

135

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 372: Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Decision Document (CADD)/Closure Report (CR) has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 372, Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters, located within Areas 18 and 20 at the Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO). Corrective Action Unit 372 comprises four corrective action sites (CASs): 18-45-02, Little Feller I Surface Crater 18-45-03, Little Feller II Surface Crater 20-23-01, U-20k Contamination Area 20-45-01, U-20L Crater (Cabriolet) The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 372 based on the implementation of the corrective action of closure in place with administrative controls at all CASs. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from November 9, 2009, through December 10, 2010, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 372: Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters. The approach for the CAI was divided into two facets: investigation of the primary release of radionuclides and investigation of other releases (migration in washes and chemical releases). The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 372 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on a data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Investigation results were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. A radiological dose FAL was established of 25 millirem per year based on the Remote Work Area exposure scenario (336 hours of annual exposure). Radiological doses exceeding the FAL were found to be present at all four CASs. It is assumed that radionuclide levels present within the Little Feller I and Cabriolet high contamination areas and within the craters at Palanquin and Cabriolet exceed the FAL. It is also assumed that potential source material in the form of lead bricks at Little Feller I and lead-acid batteries at Palanquin and Cabriolet exceed the FAL. Therefore, corrective actions were undertaken that consist of removing potential source material, where present, and implementing a use restriction and posting warning signs at each CAS. These use restrictions were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: No further corrective actions are necessary for CAU 372. A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 372. Corrective Action Unit 372 should be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

Matthews, Patrick and Sloop, Christy

2011-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

136

Record of Decision: York County Energy Partners Cogeneration Facility, York County, Pennsylvania  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

37 37 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 161 / Monday, August 21, 1995 / Notices the 6-acre parcel for sale on a competitive basis to the private sector for industrial development similar to that in the surrounding Fort Holabird Industrial Park. It is anticipated up to three industrial/manufacturing operations could be located on the property, associated parking facilities, and infrastructure. Access to the facility would be through the Fort Holabird Industrial Park on South Road. Alternative 2 is to offer the 6-acre parcel for sale on a competitive bid basis to the private sector for development into a low density housing (4 units per acre) development, similar to that adjacent to the site. Under this alternative, approximately 24 homes and associated infrastructure would be

137

Record of Decision for the Electrical Interconnection of the COB Energy Facility (DOE/EIS-0343)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The COB Energy Facility would be constructed on a site near the rural community of Bonanza, in Klamath County, Oregon. Generating components of the project would be constructed in either one or two phases, including four air-cooled combustion turbine generators fueled with natural gas, four heat recovery steam generators, and two steam turbines. Additional facilities include a new 7.2-mile-long 500-kV transmission line, a new 4.1-mile-long natural gas pipeline, a 2.8-mile-long water pipeline, a 20-acre wastewater evaporation pond or a 3,770-foot-long irrigation pipeline to deliver wastewater to a 31-acre pasture, a 4.7-acre stormwater infiltration basin, a 1.5-acre stormwater retention pond, and various tanks, buildings, exhaust stacks, parking, and storage areas. Natural gas to fuel the combustion turbines would be supplied by way of a new 4.1-mile-long, 20-inch-diameter pipeline from a Gas Transmission Northwest's Bonanza Compressor Station. The new pipeline would be constructed within private easements adjacent to or near Klamath County road rights-of-way. Although COB Energy Facility generators would use air-cooled condensers, the project would use an average of 72 gallons per minute for steam production and station service, up to a maximum of 210 gallons per minute. The source of this water would be one existing and two new wells near the project site, drawing from a deep aquifer consistent with a State of Oregon water right permit expected to be incorporated into the State energy facility site certificate. Process wastewater would either be used to irrigate pasture or held in a lined pond to evaporate. Sanitary water would be routed to an onsite septic tank then discharged to a leach field. No wastewater would be discharged to surface waters. The COB Energy Facility would interconnect to the FCRTS at Captain Jack Substation, 7.2 miles south of the project site. PERC would construct a new 500-kV transmission line from the project site to Captain Jack Substation. Part of the transmission line would cross public land managed by the Bureau of Land Management. BPA would install additional electrical equipment at Captain Jack Substation. At this time, PERC has not requested specific points of delivery.

N /A

2004-08-20T23:59:59.000Z

138

Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 254: Area 25 R-MAD Decontamination Facility, Nevada Test Site, Nevada  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document identifies and rationalizes the US Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office's selection of a recommended corrective action alternative (CAA) appropriate to facilitate the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 254, R-MAD Decontamination Facility, under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Located in Area 25 at the Nevada Test Site in Nevada, CAU 254 is comprised of Corrective Action Site (CAS) 25-23-06, Decontamination Facility. A corrective action investigation for this CAS as conducted in January 2000 as set forth in the related Corrective Action Investigation Plan. Samples were collected from various media throughout the CAS and sent to an off-site laboratory for analysis. The laboratory results indicated the following: radiation dose rates inside the Decontamination Facility, Building 3126, and in the storage yard exceeded the average general dose rate; scanning and static total surface contamination surveys indicated that portions of the locker and shower room floor, decontamination bay floor, loft floor, east and west decon pads, north and south decontamination bay interior walls, exterior west and south walls, and loft walls were above preliminary action levels (PALs). The investigation-derived contaminants of concern (COCs) included: polychlorinated biphenyls, radionuclides (strontium-90, niobium-94, cesium-137, uranium-234 and -235), total volatile and semivolatile organic compounds, total petroleum hydrocarbons, and total Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (Metals). During the investigation, two corrective action objectives (CAOs) were identified to prevent or mitigate human exposure to COCs. Based on these CAOs, a review of existing data, future use, and current operations at the Nevada Test Site, three CAAs were developed for consideration: Alternative 1 - No Further Action; Alternative 2 - Unrestricted Release Decontamination and Verification Survey; and Alternative 3 - Unrestricted Release Decontamination and Verification Survey and Dismantling of Building 3126. These alternatives were evaluated based on four general corrective action standards and five remedy selection decision factors, and the preferred CAA chosen on technical merit was Alternative 2. This CAA was judged to meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated and applicable state and federal regulations for closure of the site, and reduce the potential for future exposure pathways.

U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office

2000-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

139

Events and Conferences | National Security | ORNL  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Areas Initiatives Facilities Events and Conferences Supporting Organizations National Security Home | Science & Discovery | National Security | Events and Conferences Events...

140

Nuclear Facilities Production Facilities  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Sand 2011-4582P. ENERGY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF Gamma Irradiation Facility (GIF) The GIF provides test cells for...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 365: Baneberry Contamination Area, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Corrective Action Unit 365 comprises one corrective action site (CAS), CAS 08-23-02, U-8d Contamination Area. The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 365 based on the implementation of the corrective action of closure in place with a use restriction (UR). Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from January 18, 2011, through August 2, 2011, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 365: Baneberry Contamination Area. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 365 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on a data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is complete and acceptable for use in supporting the DQO decisions. Investigation results were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. A radiological dose FAL of 25 millirem per year was established based on the Remote Work Area exposure scenario (336 hours of annual exposure). Radiological doses exceeding the FAL were found to be present to the southwest of the Baneberry crater. It was also assumed that radionuclide levels present within the crater and fissure exceed the FAL. Corrective actions were undertaken that consisted of establishing a UR and posting warning signs for the crater, fissure, and the area located to the southwest of the crater where soil concentrations exceeded the FAL. These URs were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: (1) No further corrective actions beyond what are described in this document are necessary for CAU 365. (2) A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 365. (3) Corrective Action Unit 365 should be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

Patrick Matthews

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

142

Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers, September 2010  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This guide presents an overview of the process for successfully planning for and installing solar technology on a federal site. It is specifically targeted to managers of federal buildings and sites, contracting officers, energy and sustainability officers, and regional procurement managers. The solar project process is outlined in a concise, easy-to-understand, step-by-step format. Information includes a brief overview of legislation and executive orders related to renewable energy and the compelling reasons for implementing a solar project on a federal site. It also includes how to assess a facility to identify the best solar installation site, project recommendations and considerations to help avoid unforeseen issues, and guidance on financing and contracting options. Case studies with descriptions of successful solar deployments across multiple agencies are presented. In addition, detailed information and sample documents for specific tasks are referenced with Web links or included in the appendixes. The guide concentrates on distributed solar generation and not large, centralized solar energy generation.

Stoltenberg, B.; Partyka, E.

2010-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

143

Amended Record of Decision: Idaho High-Level Waste and Facilities Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0287) (11/28/06)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

811 Federal Register 811 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 28, 2006 / Notices Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339. [FR Doc. E6-20124 Filed 11-27-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000-01-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Amended Record of Decision: Idaho High-Level Waste and Facilities Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Amended Record of Decision. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is amending its Record of Decision (ROD) published December 19, 2005 (70 Federal Register [FR] 75165), pursuant to the Idaho High-Level Waste and Facilities Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement (Final EIS) (DOE/EIS-0287, September 2002). The Final EIS analyzed two sets of alternatives for accomplishing DOE's

144

Coordination Meeting with National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Field Office Safety Basis Review Team Leader for Transuranic Waste Facility Preiminary Documented Safety Analysis Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

HIAR-LANL-2013-04-08 HIAR-LANL-2013-04-08 Site: Los Alamos National Laboratory Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for Coordination Meeting with National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Field Office Safety Basis Review Team Leader for Transuranic Waste Facility Preliminary Documented Safety Analysis Report Dates of Activity : 04/08/13 Report Preparer: James O. Low Activity Description/Purpose: The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) staff visited the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) to coordinate with the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Los Alamos Field Office (NA-00-LA) Safety Basis Review Team (SBRT) Leader for review of the revised preliminary documented safety analysis (PDSA) for the Transuranic Waste

145

Coordination Meeting with National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Field Office Safety Basis Review Team Leader for Transuranic Waste Facility Preiminary Documented Safety Analysis Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

HIAR-LANL-2013-04-08 HIAR-LANL-2013-04-08 Site: Los Alamos National Laboratory Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for Coordination Meeting with National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Field Office Safety Basis Review Team Leader for Transuranic Waste Facility Preliminary Documented Safety Analysis Report Dates of Activity : 04/08/13 Report Preparer: James O. Low Activity Description/Purpose: The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) staff visited the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) to coordinate with the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Los Alamos Field Office (NA-00-LA) Safety Basis Review Team (SBRT) Leader for review of the revised preliminary documented safety analysis (PDSA) for the Transuranic Waste

146

Security guide for subcontractors  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This security guide of the Department of Energy covers contractor and subcontractor access to DOE and Mound facilities. The topics of the security guide include responsibilities, physical barriers, personnel identification system, personnel and vehicular access controls, classified document control, protecting classified matter in use, storing classified matter repository combinations, violations, security education clearance terminations, security infractions, classified information nondisclosure agreement, personnel security clearances, visitor control, travel to communist-controlled or sensitive countries, shipment security, and surreptitious listening devices.

Adams, R.C.

1991-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

147

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 374: Area 20 Schooner Unit Crater, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada with ROTC 1, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit 374 comprises five corrective action sites (CASs): 18-22-05, Drum 18-22-06, Drums (20) 18-22-08, Drum 18-23-01, Danny Boy Contamination Area 20-45-03, U-20u Crater (Schooner) The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 374 based on the implementation of corrective actions. The corrective action of closure in place with administrative controls was implemented at CASs 18-23-01 and 20-45-03, and a corrective action of removing potential source material (PSM) was conducted at CAS 20-45-03. The other CASs require no further action; however, best management practices of removing PSM and drums at CAS 18-22-06, and removing drums at CAS 18-22-08 were performed. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from May 4 through October 6, 2010, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 374: Area 20 Schooner Unit Crater, Nevada Test Site, Nevada. The approach for the CAI was divided into two facets: investigating the primary release of radionuclides and investigating other releases (migration in washes and chemical releases). The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 374 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on the data quality indicator parameters. This evaluation demonstrated the dataset is acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Analytes detected during the CAI were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. Radiological doses exceeding the FAL of 25 millirem per year were found to be present in the surface soil that was sampled. It is assumed that radionuclide levels present in subsurface media within the craters and ejecta fields (default contamination boundaries) at the Danny Boy and Schooner sites exceed the FAL. It is also assumed that PSM in the form of lead-acid batteries at Schooner exceeds the FAL. Therefore, corrective actions were undertaken that consist of removing PSM, where present, and implementing a use restriction and posting warning signs at the Danny Boy and Schooner sites. These use restrictions were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: No further corrective actions are necessary for CAU 374. A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 374. Corrective Action Unit 374 should be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

Patrick Matthews

2011-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

148

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 367: Area 10 Sedan, Ess and Uncle Unit Craters Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit 367 comprises four corrective action sites (CASs): 10-09-03, Mud Pit 10-45-01, U-10h Crater (Sedan) 10-45-02, Ess Crater Site 10-45-03, Uncle Crater Site The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation of the corrective actions and site closure activities implemented at CAU 367. A corrective action of closure in place with use restrictions was completed at each of the three crater CASs (10-45-01, 10-45-02, and 10-45-03); corrective actions were not required at CAS 10-09-03. In addition, a limited soil removal corrective action was conducted at the location of a potential source material release. Based on completion of these correction actions, no additional corrective action is required at CAU 367, and site closure is considered complete. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from February 2010 through March 2011, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 367: Area 10 Sedan, Ess and Uncle Unit Craters, Nevada Test Site, Nevada. The approach for the CAI was divided into two facets: investigation of the primary release of radionuclides, and investigation of non-test or other releases (e.g., migration in washes and potential source material). Based on the proximity of the Uncle, Ess, and Sedan craters, the impact of the Sedan test on the fallout deposited from the two earlier tests, and aerial radiological surveys, the CAU 367 investigation was designed to study the releases from the three crater CASs as one combined release (primary release). Corrective Action Site 10-09-03, Mud Pit, consists of two mud pits identified at CAU 367. The mud pits are considered non-test releases or other releases and were investigated independent of the three crater CASs. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 367 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on a data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is complete and acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Analytes detected during the CAI were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. For the primary release, radiological doses exceeding the FAL of 25 millirem per year were not found to be present in the surface or shallow subsurface soil outside the default contamination boundary. However, it was assumed that radionuclides are present in subsurface media within each of the three craters (Sedan, Ess, and Uncle) due to prompt injection of radionuclides from the tests. Based on the assumption of radiological dose exceeding the FAL, corrective actions were undertaken that consisted of implementing a use restriction and posting warning signs at each crater CAS. These use restrictions were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. With regard to other releases, no contaminants of concern were identified at the mud pits or any of the other release locations, with one exception. Potential source material in the form of lead was found at one location. A corrective action of clean closure was implemented at this location, and verification samples indicated that no further action is necessary. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 367. Corrective Action Unit 367 should be promoted from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

Patrick Matthews

2011-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

149

Final Status Survey Report for Corrective Action Unit 117 - Pluto Disassembly Facility, Building 2201, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada  

SciTech Connect

This document contains the process knowledge, radiological data and subsequent statistical methodology and analysis to support approval for the radiological release of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 117 Pluto Disassembly Facility, Building 2201 located in Area 26 of the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS). Preparations for release of the building began in 2009 and followed the methodology described in the Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM). MARSSIM is the DOE approved process for release of Real Property (buildings and landmasses) to a set of established criteria or authorized limits. The pre-approved authorized limits for surface contamination values and corresponding assumptions were established by DOE O 5400.5. The release criteria coincide with the acceptance criteria of the U10C landfill permit. The U10C landfill is the proposed location to dispose of the radiologically non-impacted, or clean, building rubble following demolition. However, other disposition options that include the building and/or waste remaining at the NNSS may be considered providing that the same release limits apply. The Final Status Survey was designed following MARSSIM guidance by reviewing historical documentation and radiological survey data. Following this review a formal radiological characterization survey was performed in two phases. The characterization revealed multiple areas of residual radioactivity above the release criteria. These locations were remediated (decontaminated) and then the surface activity was verified to be less than the release criteria. Once remediation efforts had been successfully completed, a Final Status Survey Plan (10-015, Final Status Survey Plan for Corrective Action Unit 117 Pluto Disassembly Facility, Building 2201) was developed and implemented to complete the final step in the MARSSIM process, the Final Status Survey. The Final Status Survey Plan consisted of categorizing each individual room into one of three categories: Class 1, Class 2 or Class 3 (a fourth category is a Non-Impacted Class which in the case of Building 2201 only pertained to exterior surfaces of the building.) The majority of the rooms were determined to fall in the less restrictive Class 3 category, however, Rooms 102, 104, 106, and 107 were identified as containing Class 1 and 2 areas. Building 2201 was divided into survey units and surveyed following the requirements of the Final Status Survey Plan for each particular class. As each survey unit was completed and documented, the survey results were evaluated. Each sample (static measurement) with units of counts per minute (cpm) was corrected for the appropriate background and converted to a value with units of dpm/100 cm2. With a surface contamination value in the appropriate units, it was compared to the surface contamination limits, or in this case the derived concentration guideline level (DCGLw). The appropriate statistical test (sign test) was then performed. If the survey unit was statistically determined to be below the DCGLw, then the survey unit passed and the null hypothesis (that the survey unit is above limits) was rejected. If the survey unit was equal to or below the critical value in the sign test, the null hypothesis was not rejected. This process was performed for all survey units within Building 2201. A total of thirty-three Class 1, four Class 2, and one Class 3 survey units were developed, surveyed, and evaluated. All survey units successfully passed the statistical test. Building 2201 meets the release criteria commensurate with the Waste Acceptance Criteria (for radiological purposes) of the U10C landfill permit residing within NNSS boundaries. Based on the thorough statistical sampling and scanning of the buildings interior, Building 2201 may be considered radiologically clean, or free of contamination.

Jeremy Gwin and Douglas Frenette

2010-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

150

Decision Summaries | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Decision Summaries Decision Summaries Decision Summaries RSS January 16, 2014 Summary of Decisions - December 30, 2013 - January 3, 2014 Decisions were issued on: - Privacy Act Appeal January 10, 2014 Summary of Decisions - MM DD YYYY - MM DD YYYY Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) December 27, 2013 Summary of Decisions - December 23, 2013 - December 27, 2013 Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) December 20, 2013 Summary of Decisions - December 16, 2013 - December 20, 2013 Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) December 13, 2013 Summary of Decisions - December 9, 2013 - December 13, 2013 Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal

151

Packaging and Transfer of Hazardous Materials and Materials of National Security Interest Assessment plan - Developed By NNSA/Nevada Site Office Facility Representative Division  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PACKAGING AND TRANSFER PACKAGING AND TRANSFER OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND MATERIALS OF NATIONAL SECURITY INTEREST Assessment Plan NNSA/Nevada Site Office Facility Representative Division Performance Objective: Verify that packaging and transportation safety requirements of hazardous materials and materials of national security interest have been established and are in compliance with DOE Orders 461.1 and 460.1B Criteria: Verify that safety requirements for the proper packaging and transportation of DOE/NNSA offsite shipments and onsite transfers of hazardous materials and for modal transport have been established [DOE O 460.1B, 1, "Objectives"]. Verify that the contractor transporting a package of hazardous materials is in compliance with the requirements of the Hazardous Materials Regulations

152

Record of Decision Remedial Alternative Selection for the Fire Department Hose Training Facility (904-113G) Operable Unit  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This decision document presents the selected remedial alternative for the FDHTF located at the SRS in Aiken, South Carolina. The selected alternative was developed in accordance with RCRA, CERCLA, as amended, and to the extent practicable, the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan. This decision is based on the Administrative Record File for this specific RCRA/CERCLA unit.

Palmer, E.

1999-02-10T23:59:59.000Z

153

Hazardous Material Security (Maryland)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

All facilities processing, storing, managing, or transporting hazardous materials must be evaluated every five years for security issues. A report must be submitted to the Department of the...

154

Improved Meteorological Input for Atmospheric Release Decision support Systems and an Integrated LES Modeling System for Atmospheric Dispersion of Toxic Agents: Homeland Security Applications  

SciTech Connect

When hazardous material is accidently or intentionally released into the atmosphere, emergency response organizations look to decision support systems (DSSs) to translate contaminant information provided by atmospheric models into effective decisions to protect the public and emergency responders and to mitigate subsequent consequences. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS)-led Interagency Modeling and Atmospheric Assessment Center (IMAAC) is one of the primary DSSs utilized by emergency management organizations. IMAAC is responsible for providing 'a single piont for the coordination and dissemination of Federal dispersion modeling and hazard prediction products that represent the Federal position' during actual or potential incidents under the National Response Plan. The Department of Energy's (DOE) National Atmospheric Release Advisory Center (NARAC), locatec at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), serves as the primary operations center of the IMAAC. A key component of atmospheric release decision support systems is meteorological information - models and data of winds, turbulence, and other atmospheric boundary-layer parameters. The accuracy of contaminant predictions is strongly dependent on the quality of this information. Therefore, the effectiveness of DSSs can be enhanced by improving the meteorological options available to drive atmospheric transport and fate models. The overall goal of this project was to develop and evaluate new meteorological modeling capabilities for DSSs based on the use of NASA Earth-science data sets in order to enhance the atmospheric-hazard information provided to emergency managers and responders. The final report describes the LLNL contributions to this multi-institutional effort. LLNL developed an approach to utilize NCAR meteorological predictions using NASA MODIS data for the New York City (NYC) region and demonstrated the potential impact of the use of different data sources and data parameterizations on IMAAC/NARAC fate and transport predictions. A case study involving coastal sea breeze circulation patterns in the NYC region was used to investigate the sensitivity of atmospheric dispersion results on the source of three-dimensional wind field data.

Arnold, E; Simpson, M; Larsen, S; Gash, J; Aluzzi, F; Lundquist, J; Sugiyama, G

2010-04-26T23:59:59.000Z

155

Audit of Selected Aspects of the Unclassified Computer Security Program at a DOE Headquarters Computing Facility, AP-B-95-02  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL AUDIT OF SELECTED ASPECTS OF THE UNCLASSIFIED COMPUTER SECURITY PROGRAM AT A DOE HEADQUARTERS COMPUTING FACILITY The Office of Inspector General wants to make the distribution of its reports as customer friendly and cost effective as possible. Therefore, this report will be available electronically through the Internet five to seven days after publication at the alternative addresses: Department of Energy Headquarters Gopher gopher.hr.doe.gov Department of Energy Headquarters Anonymous FTP vm1.hqadmin.doe.gov U.S. Department of Energy Human Resources and Administration Home Page

156

Security | Argonne National Laboratory  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Security Security Nonproliferation and Nuclear Forensics Decision Science Sensors and Materials Security Enhancing national and homeland security requires technological advancements in everything from biosensors to risk assessments. Game-changing scientific discovery is required for the development of sensors, detectors and other technological advancements used to protect and defend our country. At Argonne, our highly collaborative community of scientists and engineers discover and develop critical security and defense technologies to prevent and mitigate events with the potential for mass disruption or destruction, thereby protecting our citizens and our national interests. Our goal is to make America a safer place through innovations in threat decision science, sensors and materials, infrastructure assurance,

157

Summary of Decisions- September 24, 2012 September 28, 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

158

Summary of Decisions- December 10, 2012 December 14, 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

159

Summary of Decisions- January 21, 2013 January 25, 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

160

Summary of Decisions- February 25, 2013 March 1, 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Summary of Decisions - August 13 August 17, 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

162

Summary of Decisions- April 22, 2013 April 26, 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

163

Summary of Decisions- August 12, 2013- August 16, 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

164

Summary of Decisions- April 29, 2013 May 3, 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

165

Office of Security Policy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Office of Security Policy Office of Security Policy Mission and Functions The Office of Security Policy develops and promulgates safeguards and security policy governing the protection of National Security and other critical assets entrusted to the Department. Director's Perspective Welcome to the Office of Security Policy Jack Cowden, Director The Office of Security Policy analyzes, develops and interprets safeguards and security policy governing national security functions and the protection of related critical assets entrusted to the Department. This includes the protection of DOE nuclear facilities, nuclear weapons components, special nuclear materials and classified information. Our broad topical areas are organized as: Program Planning and Management, Protection Program Operations (which includes both physical security and protective forces), Information Security and Material Control and Accountability.

166

Summary of Decisions - July 9 - 13, 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Application for Exception

167

Expertise | Y-12 National Security Complex  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

event. As one of the National Nuclear Security Administration's original nuclear weapons production facilities, Y-12 National Security Complex has more than 60 years of...

168

Lab resumes work on NMSSUP security project  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

by the weather. I expect a full restart in the late March timeframe." Facility, nuclear material remain secure The Nuclear Material Safeguards and Security Upgrade Project...

169

Sandia National Laboratories: National Security Missions: Internationa...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

objectives; Securing and safeguarding WMD materials and facilities; Enhancing security of nuclear weapons globally Countering, responding to, and recovering from WMD use by...

170

Decision-analytic framework for portfolio selection: choosing among supplemental environmental research projects proposed for the Great Plains Coal Gasification Facility  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report describes the development and application of a hierarchical decision-analytic framework for selecting a portfolio of research and development projects. A US Department of Energy steering committee used the framework to develop a comprehensive and defensible $12 million Supplemental Environmental Program (SEP) for the Great Plains Coal Gasification Facility. This decision problem was characterized by: (1) five technical subcommittees that proposed detailed studies addressing different environmental and health issues; (2) many combinations of proposed studies that satisfied the $12 million budgetary constraint; (3) multiple objectives that required value tradeoffs at both the committee and subcommittee levels; and (4) uncertainties about research needs, data availability, and costs. The framework for determining funding (study) priorities used the principles of decision analysis to divide the overall SEP problem into a series of smaller subproblems tailored to the specific organizational structure of the steering committee and its five subcommittees. A dynamic optimization procedure was used to compare alternative funding strategies; the strategies were ranked on the basis of their expected utility, as calculated with a multiattribute utility function. Each subcommittee chairman was directly responsible for ranking the studies proposed by his subcommittee and, on the basis of that ranking, quantifying the degree to which the proposed research plan met objectives established for the entire SEP by the steering committee chairman. The approach is applicable to similar portfolio selection problems in both the public and private sectors.

Peerenboom, J.P.; Buehring, W.A.; Joseph, T.W.

1984-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

171

EIS-0350-S1: Amended Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

350-S1: Amended Record of Decision 350-S1: Amended Record of Decision EIS-0350-S1: Amended Record of Decision Nuclear Facility Portion of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building Replacement Project at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM For more information: Mr. George J. Rael Assistant Manager Environmental Operations NEPA Compliance Officer U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Site Office 3747 West Jemez Road, Los Alamos, NM 87544 Telephone: 505-606-0397 Electronic mail: NEPALASO@doeal.gov The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is issuing this Amended Record of Decision (AROD) for the Nuclear Facility portion of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building Replacement (CMRR) Project at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in

172

EIS-0350-S1: Amended Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Amended Record of Decision Amended Record of Decision EIS-0350-S1: Amended Record of Decision Nuclear Facility Portion of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building Replacement Project at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM For more information: Mr. George J. Rael Assistant Manager Environmental Operations NEPA Compliance Officer U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Site Office 3747 West Jemez Road, Los Alamos, NM 87544 Telephone: 505-606-0397 Electronic mail: NEPALASO@doeal.gov The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is issuing this Amended Record of Decision (AROD) for the Nuclear Facility portion of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building Replacement (CMRR) Project at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in

173

Independent Oversight Assessment, Y-12 National Security Complex- June 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Assessment of Nuclear Safety Culture at the Y-12 National Security Complex Uranium Processing Facility Project

174

Y-12 and the Nuclear Security Enterprise | Y-12 National Security...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

risk of proliferation and to sustain the nuclear deterrent. Y-12 is one of six production facilities in the National Nuclear Security Administration's Nuclear Security Enterprise....

175

EIS-0236: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transformation --Tritium Research and Development, Flight Test Transformation --Tritium Research and Development, Flight Test Operations, and Major Environmental Test Facilities The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), a separately organized agency within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), is issuing this Record of Decision (ROD) for the continued transformation of the nuclear weapons complex (Complex). The SPEIS analyzes the potential environmental impacts of alternatives for transforming the nuclear weapons complex into a smaller, more efficient enterprise that can respond to changing national security challenges and ensure the long-term safety, security, and reliability of the nuclear weapons stockpile! DOE/EIS-0236, Record of Decision for the Complex Transformation Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement--Tritium Research

176

ARM - Facility News Article  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

instruments and equipment, as well as local facilities such as hospitals, groceries, and gas stations. Next steps will involve such items as securing access to power from nearby...

177

EIS-0161: Consolidated Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Consolidated Record of Decision Consolidated Record of Decision EIS-0161: Consolidated Record of Decision Tritium Supply and Recycling The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) completed the Tritium Supply and Recycling Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) (DOE/EIS-0161) in October 1995. The Tritium Supply and Recycling PEIS assessed the potential environmental impacts of technology and siting alternatives for the production of tritium for national security purposes as well as the impacts of constructing a new Tritium Extraction Facility (TEF) at the Department's Savannah River Site near Aiken, SC. DOE/EIS-0161, Consolidated Record of Decision for Tritium Supply and Recycling (May 1999) More Documents & Publications EIS-0288: Consolidated Record of Decision (EIS-0270 & EIS-0271)

178

Addendum to the Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 254: Area 25 R-MAD Decontamination Facility, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (Rev. 0, December 2000)  

SciTech Connect

This document is an addendum to the Corrective Action Decision Document (CADD) that has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 254, Area 25 Reactor Maintenance, Assembly, and Disassembly (R-MAD) Decontamination Facility. CAU 254 consists of Corrective Action Site (CAS) 25-23-06, Decontamination Facility. The purpose of this addendum is to provide a rationale for the recommendation of a revised preferred alternative corrective action for CAU 254. This preferred alternative corrective action, Alternative 3, consists of the removal of accessible soil/sediment and all building material above ground level from the CAU 254 Site. This alternative is being recommended because a cost-effective technology is now available to dismantle the contaminated building and ensure complete removal of all CAU 254 CADD-identified contaminants of concern and any associated contamination. This preferred closure method alternative reduces the potential for future exposure pathways. Procedures will be developed, presented in the Corrective Action Plan, and implemented to ensure worker health and safety, protection of human health and the environment, and to meet all unrestricted release requirements in accordance with applicable state and federal regulations.

DOE /NV

2000-12-12T23:59:59.000Z

179

Security Perimeter  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Security Perimeter Security Perimeter Protecting the Laboratory against threats and vulnerabilities. Contact Security Perimeter Coordinators Email The security perimeter helps to...

180

Secure Data Center (Fact Sheet)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This fact sheet describes the purpose, lab specifications, applications scenarios, and information on how to partner with NREL's Secure Data Center at the Energy Systems Integration Facility.

Not Available

2012-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Corrective Action Decision Document/Corrective Action Plan for the 92-Acre Area and Corrective Action Unit 111: Area 5 WMD Retired Mixed Waste Pits, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Corrective Action Plan (CADD/CAP) has been prepared for the 92-Acre Area, the southeast quadrant of the Radioactive Waste Management Site, located in Area 5 of the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS). The 92-Acre Area includes Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 111, 'Area 5 WMD Retired Mixed Waste Pits.' Data Quality Objectives (DQOs) were developed for the 92-Acre Area, which includes CAU 111. The result of the DQO process was that the 92-Acre Area is sufficiently characterized to provide the input data necessary to evaluate corrective action alternatives (CAAs) without the collection of additional data. The DQOs are included as Appendix A of this document. This CADD/CAP identifies and provides the rationale for the recommended CAA for the 92-Acre Area, provides the plan for implementing the CAA, and details the post-closure plan. When approved, this CADD/CAP will supersede the existing Pit 3 (P03) Closure Plan, which was developed in accordance with Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 265, 'Interim Status Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.' This document will also serve as the Closure Plan and the Post-Closure Plan, which are required by 40 CFR 265, for the 92-Acre Area. After closure activities are complete, a request for the modification of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Permit that governs waste management activities at the NNSS will be submitted to the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection to incorporate the requirements for post-closure monitoring. Four CAAs, ranging from No Further Action to Clean Closure, were evaluated for the 92-Acre Area. The CAAs were evaluated on technical merit focusing on performance, reliability, feasibility, safety, and cost. Based on the evaluation of the data used to develop the conceptual site model; a review of past, current, and future operations at the site; and the detailed and comparative analysis of the potential CAAs, Closure in Place with Administrative Controls is the preferred CAA for the 92-Acre Area. Closure activities will include the following: (1) Constructing an engineered evapotranspiration cover over the 92-Acre Area; (2) Installing use restriction (UR) warning signs, concrete monuments, and subsidence survey monuments; (3) Establishing vegetation on the cover; (4) Implementing a UR; and (5) Implementing post-closure inspections and monitoring. The Closure in Place with Administrative Controls alternative meets all requirements for the technical components evaluated, fulfills all applicable federal and state regulations for closure of the site, and will minimize potential future exposure pathways to the buried waste at the site.

NSTec Environmental Restoration

2010-11-22T23:59:59.000Z

182

Deputy Secretary Decision Affirming Decision as Modified, January 19, 2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Daniel Holsinger, Complainant, v. K-Ray Security, Inc., Respondent OHA Case Nos. VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 Daniel Holsinger, Complainant, v. K-Ray Security, Inc., Respondent OHA Case Nos. VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 DECISION AFFIRMING AGENCY DECISION AS MODIFIED Issued: January 19, 2000 This is a request for review by K-Ray Security, Inc., the current security operations contractor at DOE's Federal Energy Technology Center ("FETC"), of the Decision of the Office of Hearings and Appeals ("OHA") on remand from the Deputy Secretary adhering, after an additional evidentiary hearing and an assessment of the equities, to its earlier finding that reinstatement of Complainant Holsinger as a security guard is a necessary and appropriate action to effect full relief, even though it was the prior security contractor, Watkins Security Agency, Inc., ("WSA") that was found to have committed the act of reprisal

183

A Framework for Improving Building Operating Decisions  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

to develop a decision analysis tool to help facility managers make proactive energy and maintenance management decisions. The presentation will conclude with an overview of the...

184

EIS-0283: Amended Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3: Amended Record of Decision EIS-0283: Amended Record of Decision Surplus Plutonium Disposition: Waste Solidification Building The National Nuclear Security Administration (NSSA),...

185

EIS-0283: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

: Record of Decision EIS-0283: Record of Decision Surplus Plutonium Disposition The Department has decided to implement a program to provide for the safe and secure disposition of...

186

National Security | ornl.gov  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Program Areas Program Areas Initiatives Facilities Events and Conferences Supporting Organizations A scientific approach to global security Initiatives | Programs Home | Science & Discovery | National Security National Security | National Security SHARE ORNL plays an important role in national and global security by virtue of its expertise in advanced materials, nuclear science, supercomputing and other scientific specialties. Discovery and innovation in these areas are essential for protecting US citizens and advancing national and global security priorities. ORNL supports these missions by using its signature strengths to meet complex national security challenges in a number of areas. Nuclear Nonproliferation - The laboratory's expertise and experience covers the spectrum of nuclear nonproliferation work, from basic R&D to

187

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 569: Area 3 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites Nevada National Security Site, Nevada with ROTC 1, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report presents information supporting the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 569: Area 3 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada. CAU 569 comprises the following nine corrective action sites (CASs): 03-23-09, T-3 Contamination Area 03-23-10, T-3A Contamination Area 03-23-11, T-3B Contamination Area 03-23-12, T-3S Contamination Area 03-23-13, T-3T Contamination Area 03-23-14, T-3V Contamination Area 03-23-15, S-3G Contamination Area 03-23-16, S-3H Contamination Area 03-23-21, Pike Contamination Area The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 569 based on the implementation of the corrective actions listed in Table ES-2.

Sloop, Christy

2013-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

188

Deputy Secretary Decision Remanding VWA-0005 Decision and Order  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DANIEL HOLSINGER, Complainant DANIEL HOLSINGER, Complainant v. K-RAY SECURITY, INC., Respondent. OHA Case No. LWA-0005, LWA-0009 DECISION REVERSING AND REMANDING INITIAL AGENCY DECISION This is a request for review by K-Ray Security, Inc., from the Initial Agency Decision by the Office of Hearings and Appeals ("OHA"), finding that reinstatement of Mr. Holsinger as a security guard is a necessary and appropriate action to effect full relief for a retaliatory termination made by the previous security contractor, Watkins Security Agency, Inc., ("WSA"). Based upon my review of the regulatory language, the relevant case law, and the entire record, I conclude that OHA's decision is incorrect. Mr. Holsinger filed a complaint with the Office of Contractor Employee Protection ("OCEP") on October 7, 1994. R. 103-106. He

189

Worker Safety and Health Enforcement Letter issued to Los Alamos National Security, LLC, related to Worker Beryllium Exposure during Machining at the Los Alamos National Laboratorys Beryllium Technology Facility, May 29, 2013 (WEL-2013-01)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

29, 2013 29, 2013 Dr. Charles F. McMillan, President Los Alamos National Security, LLC Los Alamos National Laboratory Mailstop A 100, Drop Point 03140071S Bikini Atoll Road, TA-3 Los Alamos, New Mexico 87454 WEL-2013-01 Dear Dr. McMillan: The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight evaluated the circumstances surrounding a work evolution performed at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Technical Area 3, Building 141, Beryllium Technology Facility (BTF), on July 11, 2012. The work evolution resulted in a worker exposure to beryllium in excess of the Department of Energy (DOE) action level of 0.2 micrograms per cubic meter for an 8-hour, time-weighted average. Los Alamos National Security, LLC (LANS), which manages and

190

Pantex Facility 10-Year Natural Phenomena Flood Hazard Analysis  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Planning (cont.) What's Next FDC-1 Facilities (500 yr Storm) * Critical Mission SSCs * Essential Safety Facilities * Essential Security Facilities Conceptual Study * Mitigation...

191

Summary of Decisions- October 29, 2012 November 2, 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Privacy Act Appeal

192

Y-12 National Security Complex Technologies Available for ...  

Y-12 National Security Complex Technologies Available for Licensing The Y-12 National Security Complex is a premier manufacturing facility dedicated to making our ...

193

Secretary Bodman Makes "Energizing America for Energy Security...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Makes "Energizing America for Energy Security" Tour Stops to Launch New Solar Facility Secretary Bodman Makes "Energizing America for Energy Security" Tour Stops to Launch New...

194

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 375: Area 30 Buggy Unit Craters, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit 375 comprises three corrective action sites (CASs): (1) 25-23-22, Contaminated Soils Site; (2) 25-34-06, Test Cell A Bunker; and (3) 30-45-01, U-30a, b, c, d, e Craters. The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 375 based on the implementation of corrective action of closure in place with administrative controls at CAS 25-23-22, no further action at CAS 25-34-06, and closure in place with administrative controls and removal of potential source material (PSM) at CAS 30-45-01. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from July 28, 2010, through April 4, 2011, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 375: Area 30 Buggy Unit Craters. The approach for the CAI was divided into two facets: investigation of the primary release of radionuclides, and investigation of other releases (migration in washes and chemical releases). The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 375 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on the data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Investigation results were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. A radiological dose FAL of 25 millirem per year was established based on the Remote Work Area exposure scenario (336 hours of annual exposure). Radiological doses exceeding the FAL were assumed to be present within the default contamination boundaries at CASs 25-23-22 and 30-45-01. No contaminants were identified at CAS 25-34-06, and no corrective action is necessary. Potential source material in the form of lead plate, lead-acid batteries, and oil within an abandoned transformer were identified at CAS 30-45-01, and corrective actions were undertaken that consisted of removing the PSM. Use restrictions and warning signs were implemented for the remaining radiological contamination at CASs 25-23-22 and 30-45-01. These use restrictions were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: (1) No further corrective actions are necessary for CAU 375; (2) A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 375; and (3) Move CAU 375 from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

Patrick Matthews

2011-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

195

Global Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Global Security Global Security LANL's mission is to develop and apply science and technology to ensure the safety, security, and effectiveness of the U.S. nuclear deterrent;...

196

Environment/Health/Safety/Security (EHSS): Security and Emergency Services  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Security and Emergency Services Security and Emergency Services SEO Home page collage Documents Organization Chart Related Sites Fire Department Security Services EMERGENCY SERVICES The purpose of Berkeley Lab's Emergency Services is to ensure emergency resources are in maximum readiness, before, during, and after any emergency. ISSM: Integrated Safeguards and Security Management Security Updates MISSION STATEMENT: Provide integrated and efficient life safety, emergency and security services to all employees, guests, and users at the main Berkeley site and off-site facilities. Also, promote continuous improvement of the Lab's scientific and supportive activities. The core competencies of the group are: Emergency response to include fire suppression, emergency medical and hazmat response services

197

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 1, 2012 November 1, 2012 PSH-12-0074 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 1, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about the individual's financial irresponsibility. His behavior raised security concerns under Criterion L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, she found that October 26, 2012 PSH-12-0076 - Personnel Security Hearing On October 26, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she

198

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 11, 2012 October 11, 2012 PSH-12-0081 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 11, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance for providing false information on a Questionnaire for National Security Positions and failing to comply with rules regarding the handling of classified information and conduct within simited access areas. This behavior raised security concerns under Criteria F, G, and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer fo October 2, 2012 PSH-12-0052 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 2, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he

199

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 5, 2013 March 5, 2013 PSH-12-0133 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On March 5, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be granted. A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about his misrepresentations and misuse of information technology. The individual's behavior raised security concerns under Criteria F and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual presented sufficient evidence to resolve the security concerns associated March 5, 2013 PSH-12-0131 - In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing On March 5, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he

200

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

OFFICIAL USE ONLY OFFICIAL USE ONLY Official Use Only (OUO) information is certain unclassified information that may be exempt from public release under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and has the potential to damage governmental, commercial, or private interests if given to persons who do not need to know the information to perform their jobs or other DOE authorized activites. Who can determine what information is OUO? You do! Ask yourself: does the information have the potential to damage governmental, commercial, or private interests if given to persons who do not need the information to perfor their jobs? Does it fall under at least one of the FOIA exemptions? If both answers are yes, then the information is OUO. Freedom of Information Act Exemptions The FOIA generally provides that any information in a document in the Federal Government's possession must be publicly released upon request unless such information falls under one of nine exemptions.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

or both will ultimately be funded in whole or in part by DOE or NNSA from its appropriations. International travel funded by non-DOE or non-NNSA sources for which the traveler...

202

Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Finding of No Significant Impact for the Proposed Disposition of the Omega West Facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Finding of No Significant Impact for the Proposed Disposition of the Omega West Facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico U. S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Office of Los Alamos Site Operations 528 35th Street Los Alamos, NM 87544 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECUIRTY ADMINISTRATION FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Proposed Disposition of the Omega West Facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Proposed Disposition of the Omega West Facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory [DOE/EA- 74 IO) (attached) provides sufficient evidence and analysis to determine that a Finding Of No Significant Impact is appropriate for the Proposed Action (Complete

203

Office of Security Operations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Office of Physical Protection Office of Physical Protection Bill Dwyer Director, 202-586-7887 Mission The mission of the Office of Physical Protection is to implement and oversee dedicated human resources, processes, and equipment designed to protect personnel and assets entrusted to our care at Department of Energy (DOE) Headquarters facilities. The Office is comprised of dedicated DOE Federal security professionals, Headquarters Protective Force personnel, and Alarms and Access Control Technicians. These security subject matter experts work together to ensure compliance with DOE Safeguards and Security regulations, Interagency Security Committee guidance, and federal laws. The result of this collaboration is a security program designed to ensure a safe and secure working environment for all Headquarters employees.

204

Security Plans  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Appendix A Glossary - A glossary of security terms used within the security planning document. ... F, Glossary. None applicable.

2013-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

205

Safeguards and Security and Cyber Security RM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Safeguards and Security and Safeguards and Security and Cyber Security Review Module March 2010 CD- -0 OFFICE O S CD-1 OF ENVIRO Standard Safeguar and Cy Rev Critical D CD-2 M ONMENTA Review Pla rds and S yber Secu view Modul Decision (CD CD March 2010 AL MANAG an (SRP) Security urity le D) Applicabili D-3 GEMENT ity CD-4 Post Ope eration Standard Review Plan, 2 nd Edition, March 2010 i FOREWORD The Standard Review Plan (SRP) 1 provides a consistent, predictable corporate review framework to ensure that issues and risks that could challenge the success of Office of Environmental Management (EM) projects are identified early and addressed proactively. The internal EM project review process encompasses key milestones established by DOE O 413.3A, Change 1, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, DOE-STD-

206

Border Security | ornl.gov  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Border Security Border Security SHARE Border Security Testing of unmanned aerial surveillance equipment. ORNL performs border security research at the Security Sciences Field Laboratory (SSFL), which is an indoor/outdoor facility designed to support testing and evaluation of a wide range of intrusion detection, assessment, surveillance, and peripheral physical security equipment including sensors, cameras, power generation, access control, remote communication, unmanned aerial, and activated delay systems. At the heart of SSFL is a simulated border region of varied terrain including open grassy fields, hilly wooded areas, sand pits, and lakes and streams which approximate the actual challenges of border and facility applications. A critical facet of this facility is the ability to test systems year-round under the seasonal

207

Security Controls for Computer Systems (U): Report of ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... This first step is essential in order that ... other computing systems, any facilities for security ... management controls and procedures, facility clearance is ...

2013-04-15T23:59:59.000Z

208

OHA Security Cases Archive File  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This is a archive file of our Security decisions, Please download this file to your local computer and use the build in adobe search feature. Individual cases are listed in the bookmark section of...

209

Independent Oversight Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex- May 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility Safety Basis Preliminary Safety Design Report Process at the Y-12 National Security Complex

210

National Security, Weapons Science  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

National Security, Weapons Science National Security, Weapons Science /science-innovation/_assets/images/icon-science.jpg National Security, Weapons Science National security depends on science and technology. The United States relies on Los Alamos National Laboratory for the best of both. No place on Earth pursues a broader array of world-class scientific endeavors. Dual-Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test Facility (DARHT) The Dual-Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test Facility at LANL is part of the DOE's stockpile stewardship program. It uses two large X-ray machines to record three-dimensional interior images of materials. In most experiments, materials (including plutonium) undergo hydrodynamic shock to simulate the implosion process in nuclear bombs and/or the effects of severe hydrodynamic stress. The tests are described as "full-scale mockups

211

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

14, 2012 14, 2012 PSH-12-0083 - In the Matter of In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 14, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance for failing to comply with rules regarding the handling of classified information and conduct within limited access areas and for failing to report such non-compliance. This behavior raised security concerns under Criteria G and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had presented su November 13, 2012 PSH-12-0092 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On September 24, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he

212

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 10, 2013 October 10, 2013 PSH-13-0071 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 10, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. In March 2013, as part of a background investigation, the local security office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address concerns about his alcohol use and alcohol-related incidents. October 10, 2013 PSH-13-0070 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 10, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. Following the individual's employer receiving garnishment notices from both federal and state tax authorities in January 2013, the

213

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 30, 2013 August 30, 2013 PSH-13-0049 - In the Matter of Personnel Security On August 30, 2013, a Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which he determined that an individual's access authorization should not be granted. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not resolved security concerns under Criterion L regarding the Individual's failure to report an arrest for failure to appear at an arraignment concerning traffic tickets and a citation for failing to have a controlled prescription medication in its proper container. August 29, 2013 PSH-13-0057 - In the Matter of Personnel Security On August 28, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security

214

Facility Representative Program: 2001 Facility Representative Workshop  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 Facility Representative Workshop 1 Facility Representative Workshop May 15 - 17, 2001 Las Vegas, NV Facility Rep of the Year Award | Attendees list | Summary Report [PDF] WORKSHOP AGENDA Day 1: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 Theme: Program Successes and Challenges 8:00 a.m. - Logistics Announcements & Opening Remarks - Joe Arango, Facility Representative Program Manager 8:15 a.m. - Welcome - Debbie Monette, Assistant Manager for National Security, Nevada Operations Office 8:30 a.m. - Keynote Address - Ralph Erickson, National Nuclear Security Administration 9:00 a.m.- DOE Facility Representative of the Year Presentation - Mark B. Whitaker, Jr., Departmental Representative to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 9:30 a.m. - Break 9:50 a.m. - Program Summary - Joe Arango 10:10 a.m. - Management Panel/Questions and Answers

215

Facility Representative Program: 2007 Facility Representative Workshop  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7 Facility Representative Workshop 7 Facility Representative Workshop May 15 - 17, 2007 Las Vegas, NV Facility Rep of the Year Award | Attendees list | Summary Report [PDF] WORKSHOP AGENDA Final Day 1: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 8:00 a.m. Opening Remarks Joanne Lorence, Facility Representative Program Manager 8:15 a.m. Welcome from the Nevada Site Office Gerald Talbot, Manager, Nevada Site Office 8:30 a.m. Videotaped Remarks from the Deputy Secretary The Honorable Clay Sell, Deputy Secretary of Energy 8:45 a.m. Keynote Address - Safety Oversight Perspective and Expectations Glenn Podonsky, Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer, Office of Health, Safety and Security 9:10 a.m. Facility Representative of the Year Presentation Mark B. Whitaker, Jr., Departmental Representative to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board,

216

VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

by K-Ray Security, Inc., the current security operations contractor at DOE's Federal Energy Technology Center ("FETC"), of the Decision of the Office of Hearings and Appeals...

217

International Nuclear Security  

SciTech Connect

This presentation discusses: (1) Definitions of international nuclear security; (2) What degree of security do we have now; (3) Limitations of a nuclear security strategy focused on national lock-downs of fissile materials and weapons; (4) What do current trends say about the future; and (5) How can nuclear security be strengthened? Nuclear security can be strengthened by: (1) More accurate baseline inventories; (2) Better physical protection, control and accounting; (3) Effective personnel reliability programs; (4) Minimize weapons-usable materials and consolidate to fewer locations; (5) Consider local threat environment when siting facilities; (6) Implement pledges made in the NSS process; and (7) More robust interdiction, emergency response and special operations capabilities. International cooperation is desirable, but not always possible.

Doyle, James E. [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2012-08-14T23:59:59.000Z

218

Weapons production | Y-12 National Security Complex  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Weapons production Weapons production An effective production infrastructure is critical to national security. Y-12 continues to replace World War II-era facilities to increase...

219

Information Security and Privacy Advisory Board (ISPAB) ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... simulated testing set up in fifteen government facilities. ... It is essential to understand the relationship ... to present his paper on Cyber Security Doctrine. ...

2011-07-20T23:59:59.000Z

220

Sandia National Laboratories: National Security Missions: Internationa...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

develop, test, and implement physical security technologies and systems to protect Nuclear Weapons and other high value assets, facilities and systems Create remediation...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Office of Headquarters Security Operations: Deviations Program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Headquarters facilities with an appropriately validated variance, waiver, or exception to DOE orders andor Headquarters security directives when adequately justified. Requests for...

222

Security and You Newsletter, September 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Burn Bag Room awaiting destruction. See the current Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan HQFMSP located at http:www.hss.doe hqsecophqfmsp for additional...

223

Security | Y-12 National Security Complex  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Security Security The Y-12 National Security Complex places the highest priority on maintaining and improving its security posture. We employ security police officers, cyber...

224

Active security  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In this paper we introduce active security, a new methodology which introduces programmatic control within a novel feedback loop into the defense infrastructure. Active security implements a unified programming environment which provides interfaces ... Keywords: central management, digital forensics, network security

Ryan Hand, Michael Ton, Eric Keller

2013-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

225

A Game Theoretical Approach to Communication Security  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Security solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Practical security solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . .Communication security

Gueye, Assane

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

226

EIS-0230: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0: Record of Decision EIS-0230: Record of Decision Electrical Interconnection of the Chehalis Generation Facility Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has decided to offer...

227

EIS-0360: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Record of Decision Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Portsmouth, Ohio, Site Record of Decision for Construction and...

228

Corrective Action Decision Document/Corrective Action Plan for Corrective Action Unit 98: Frenchman Flat, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This CADD/CAP follows the Corrective Action Investigation (CAI) stage, which results in development of a set of contaminant boundary forecasts produced from groundwater flow and contaminant transport modeling of the Frenchman Flat CAU. The Frenchman Flat CAU is located in the southeastern portion of the NNSS and comprises 10 underground nuclear tests. The tests were conducted between 1965 and 1971 and resulted in the release of radionuclides in the subsurface in the vicinity of the test cavities. Two important aspects of the corrective action process are presented within this CADD/CAP. The CADD portion describes the results of the Frenchman Flat CAU data-collection and modeling activities completed during the CAI stage. The corrective action objectives and the actions recommended to meet the objectives are also described. The CAP portion describes the corrective action implementation plan. The CAP begins with the presentation of CAU regulatory boundary objectives and initial use restriction boundaries that are identified and negotiated by NNSA/NSO and the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP). The CAP also presents the model evaluation process designed to build confidence that the flow and contaminant transport modeling results can be used for the regulatory decisions required for CAU closure. The first two stages of the strategy have been completed for the Frenchman Flat CAU. A value of information analysis and a CAIP were developed during the CAIP stage. During the CAI stage, a CAIP addendum was developed, and the activities proposed in the CAIP and addendum were completed. These activities included hydrogeologic investigation of the underground testing areas, aquifer testing, isotopic and geochemistry-based investigations, and integrated geophysical investigations. After these investigations, a groundwater flow and contaminant transport model was developed to forecast contaminant boundaries that enclose areas potentially exceeding the Safe Drinking Water Act radiological standards at any time within 1,000 years. An external peer review of the groundwater flow and contaminant transport model was completed, and the model was accepted by NDEP to allow advancement to the CADD/CAP stage. The CADD/CAP stage focuses on model evaluation to ensure that existing models provide adequate guidance for the regulatory decisions regarding monitoring and institutional controls. Data-collection activities are identified and implemented to address key uncertainties in the flow and contaminant transport models. During the CR stage, final use restriction boundaries and CAU regulatory boundaries are negotiated and established; a long-term closure monitoring program is developed and implemented; and the approaches and policies for institutional controls are initiated. The model evaluation process described in this plan consists of an iterative series of five steps designed to build confidence in the site conceptual model and model forecasts. These steps are designed to identify data-collection activities (Step 1), document the data-collection activities in the 0CADD/CAP (Step 2), and perform the activities (Step 3). The new data are then assessed; the model is refined, if necessary; the modeling results are evaluated; and a model evaluation report is prepared (Step 4). The assessments are made by the modeling team and presented to the pre-emptive review committee. The decision is made by the modeling team with the assistance of the pre-emptive review committee and concurrence of NNSA/NSO to continue data and model assessment/refinement, recommend additional data collection, or recommend advancing to the CR stage. A recommendation to advance to the CR stage is based on whether the model is considered to be sufficiently reliable for designing a monitoring system and developing effective institutional controls. The decision to advance to the CR stage or to return to step 1 of the process is then made by NDEP (Step 5).

Irene Farnham and Sam Marutzky

2011-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

229

Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Independence and Security Act,  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Energy Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements on Delicious

230

Municipal bond financing of solar energy facilities  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The application of the laws of municipal bond financing to solar facilities is examined. The type of facilities under consideration are outlined. The general legal principles of municipal securities financing are discussed. The effect of recent decisions applying antitrust liability to municipal corporations is also discussed. Five specific types of municipal bonds are explained. The application of Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, to the issuance of municipal bonds for solar facility financing is examined also. Five bond laws of five representative states are examined and whether the eight types of solar facilities under consideration could be financed under such law is discussed. The application of the general legal principle is illustrated. Three hypothetical situations are set forth and common legal issues to be confronted by city officials in proposing such financing are discussed. These issues will be raised in most financings, but the purpose is to examine the common context in which they are raised. It is concluded that if it can be shown that the purpose of the solar facilities to be financed is to benefit the public, all legal obstacles to the use of municipal financing of solar facilities can be substantially overcome.

White, S.S.

1979-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

231

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 23, 2013 January 23, 2013 PSH-12-0121 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. January 17, 2013 PSH-12-0118 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On January 17, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance after the individual had incurred $20,000 in charges while patronizing a "gentleman's club" on a single evening; approximately $17,000 of that amount was charged to his corporate credit card. His

232

Corrective Action Decision Document/Corrective Action Plan for Corrective Action Unit 547: Miscellaneous Contaminated Waste Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this CADD/CAP is to present the corrective action alternatives (CAAs) evaluated for CAU 547, provide justification for selection of the recommended alternative, and describe the plan for implementing the selected alternative. Corrective Action Unit 547 consists of the following three corrective action sites (CASs): (1) CAS 02-37-02, Gas Sampling Assembly; (2) CAS 03-99-19, Gas Sampling Assembly; and(3) CAS 09-99-06, Gas Sampling Assembly. The gas sampling assemblies consist of inactive process piping, equipment, and instrumentation that were left in place after completion of underground safety experiments. The purpose of these safety experiments was to confirm that a nuclear explosion would not occur in the case of an accidental detonation of the high-explosive component of the device. The gas sampling assemblies allowed for the direct sampling of the gases and particulates produced by the safety experiments. Corrective Action Site 02-37-02 is located in Area 2 of the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) and is associated with the Mullet safety experiment conducted in emplacement borehole U2ag on October 17, 1963. Corrective Action Site 03-99-19 is located in Area 3 of the NNSS and is associated with the Tejon safety experiment conducted in emplacement borehole U3cg on May 17, 1963. Corrective Action Site 09-99-06 is located in Area 9 of the NNSS and is associated with the Player safety experiment conducted in emplacement borehole U9cc on August 27, 1964. The CAU 547 CASs were investigated in accordance with the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to determine and implement appropriate corrective actions for CAU 547. Existing radiological survey data and historical knowledge of the CASs were sufficient to meet the DQOs and evaluate CAAs without additional investigation. As a result, further investigation of the CAU 547 CASs was not required. The following CAAs were identified for the gas sampling assemblies: (1) clean closure, (2) closure in place, (3) modified closure in place, (4) no further action (with administrative controls), and (5) no further action. Based on the CAAs evaluation, the recommended corrective action for the three CASs in CAU 547 is closure in place. This corrective action will involve construction of a soil cover on top of the gas sampling assembly components and establishment of use restrictions at each site. The closure in place alternative was selected as the best and most appropriate corrective action for the CASs at CAU 547 based on the following factors: (1) Provides long-term protection of human health and the environment; (2) Minimizes short-term risk to site workers in implementing corrective action; (3) Is easily implemented using existing technology; (4) Complies with regulatory requirements; (5) Fulfills FFACO requirements for site closure; (6) Does not generate transuranic waste requiring offsite disposal; (7) Is consistent with anticipated future land use of the areas (i.e., testing and support activities); and (8) Is consistent with other NNSS site closures where contamination was left in place.

Mark Krauss

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

233

LANL Biosafety Level 3 Facility Environmental Impact Statement...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Biosafety Level 3 Facility Environmental Impact Statement | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the...

234

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 106: Area 5, 11 Frenchman Flat Atmospheric Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit 106 comprises four corrective action sites (CASs): (1) 05-20-02, Evaporation Pond; (2) 05-23-05, Atmospheric Test Site - Able; (3) 05-45-04, 306 GZ Rad Contaminated Area; (4) 05-45-05, 307 GZ Rad Contaminated Area. The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 106 based on the implementation of corrective actions. The corrective action of clean closure was implemented at CASs 05-45-04 and 05-45-05, while no corrective action was necessary at CASs 05-20-02 and 05-23-05. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from October 20, 2010, through June 1, 2011, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 106: Areas 5, 11 Frenchman Flat Atmospheric Sites. The approach for the CAI was divided into two facets: investigation of the primary release of radionuclides, and investigation of other releases (mechanical displacement and chemical releases). The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 106 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on a data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is complete and acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Investigation results were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. A radiological dose FAL of 25 millirem per year was established based on the Industrial Area exposure scenario (2,250 hours of annual exposure). The only radiological dose exceeding the FAL was at CAS 05-45-05 and was associated with potential source material (PSM). It is also assumed that additional PSM in the form of depleted uranium (DU) and DU-contaminated debris at CASs 05-45-04 and 05-45-05 exceed the FAL. Therefore, corrective actions were undertaken at these CASs that consisted of removing PSM and collecting verification samples. Results of verification samples show that remaining soil does not contain contamination exceeding the FALs. Therefore, the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) provides the following recommendations: (1) No further corrective actions are necessary for CAU 106. (2) A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 106. (3) Corrective Action Unit 106 should be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

Patrick Matthews and Dawn Peterson

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

235

R:\DECISION\0060.VBX  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) reviewed both decisions, DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) reviewed both decisions, pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) by which NNSA authorized OHA to adjudicate for NNSA whistleblower complaints brought by employees of NNSA contractors under 10 CFR Part 708. Under the MOU, NNSA is responsible for implementing a final decision issued under Part 708. March 28, 2003 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Supplemental Order Name of Petitioner: Robert Burd Date of Filing: March 13, 2003 Case Number: VBX-0060 On November 16, 2001, BWXT Pantex, as successor to Mason & Hanger Corporation (M&H) (collectively referred to as "the contractor"), filed an appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued by an Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) Hearing Officer under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee

236

Decisions decisions plant vessels  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper describes concepts for a family of plant vessels that help users make decisions or reach goals. The concepts use plants to mark time or answer questions for the user, creating a connection between the user and the individual plant. These concepts ...

Jenny Liang

2007-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

237

EIS-0309: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy (DOE), is issuing this Record of Decision on the operation of the Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12) in the State of Tennessee. (67 FR 11296) National Nuclear Security...

238

Addendum to the Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 113: Area 25 R-MAD Facility, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This addendum to the Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 113: Area 25, Reactor Maintenance, Assembly, and Disassembly Facility, Building 3110, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, DOE/NV--891-VOL I-Rev. 1, dated July 2003, provides details of demolition, waste disposal, and use restriction (UR) modification for Corrective Action Unit 113, Area 25 R-MAD Facility. Demolition was completed on July 15, 2010, when the last of the building debris was disposed. Final field activities were concluded on August 30, 2010, after all equipment was demobilized and UR signs were posted. This work was funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

NSTec Environmental Restoration

2011-02-24T23:59:59.000Z

239

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 13, 2013 June 13, 2013 PSH-13-0034 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On June 13, 2013, a Hearing Officer determined that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not successfully addressed the DOE's security concerns regarding her finances under criterion (l). June 11, 2013 PSH-13-0019 - In the Matter of Personnel Security On June 11, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's authorization access should be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance following the individual contemplating suicide and, subsequently, being diagnosed by a DOE consulting psychologist as meeting the criteria for

240

Office of Safeguards, Security & Emergency Preparedness | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Safeguards, Security & Office of Safeguards, Security & Emergency Preparedness Office of Safeguards, Security & Emergency Preparedness Office of Safeguards, Security & Emergency Preparedness Mission Develop and oversee the implementation of policy and guidance with respect to security and emergency management. Foster continuous improvement across the Environmental Management (EM) complex through application of Integrated Safeguards and Security Management principles. Serve as a liaison with sites and other agencies on security and emergency management issues. Major Responsibilities Ensure the mandatory level of safeguards and security protection, with managed risk, for EM's nuclear materials, facilities, classified material, documents and other government assets. Apply the Graded Security Protection (GSP) Policy and other

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Summary of Decisions- December 17, 2012 December 21, 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Whistleblower Appeal (10 CFR Part 708)

242

Summary of Decisions- March 25, 2013 March 29, 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Whistleblower Appeal (10 CFR Part 708)

243

Geographical Information System-Based Decision Tool.pub  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Safety Security Vehicle Technologies Research Brief A geographical information system (GIS) based decision support tool that enables transportation planners to carry out...

244

EIS-0380: Amended Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Record of Decision Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), a semi-autonomous agency...

245

Security Cases  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

security-cases Office of Hearings and Appeals 1000 security-cases Office of Hearings and Appeals 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC, 20585 202-287-1566 en PSH-13-0103 - In the Matter of Personnel Security http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/psh-13-0103-matter-personnel-security security" class="title-link">PSH-13-0103 - In the Matter of Personnel Security

246

Security Policy  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... M/S ACES Pvt. Ltd. Pakistan Page Security Policy ... 2013 M/S ACES Pvt. Ltd. Pakistan 5/27/2013 Page 2. [SECURITY POLICY] May 27, 2013 ...

2013-05-29T23:59:59.000Z

247

Poland and the European Union's security and defense policy .  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

??This thesis analyzes key factors in Poland's decision-making concerning the European Union's European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP). It reviews the development of Polish policy (more)

Falecki, Tomasz.

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

249

Argonne's National Security Information Systems National  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

National Security National Security Information Systems National Security The NSIS team has worked with various government agencies and programs over the past 15 years to create customized technological solutions that meet specific needs, while also fulfilling national security objectives, improving efficiency and reducing costs. Applying a broad range of expertise and experience, the Argonne team develops both unclassified and classified information technology (IT) systems for national security and nonproliferation programs, with a focus on security operations, international treaty implementation, export control and law enforcement support. Some examples of NSIS-developed systems include:  Electronic Facility Clearance (e-FCL) System for the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD)

250

Integrated safeguards and security management plan  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Berkeley Lab is committed to scientific excellence and stewardship of its assets. While security principles apply to all work performed at the Laboratory, their implementation is flexible. Berkeley Lab adheres to the following principles: Line management owns security; Security roles and responsibilities are clearly defined and communicated; Security functions are integrated; An open environment supports the Laboratory's Mission; The security program must support the scientific and operational missions of the Laboratory and must be value added; and Security controls are tailored to individual and facility requirements.

Bowen, Sue, editor

2001-04-16T23:59:59.000Z

251

Facility Representative Program: 2010 Facility Representative Workshop  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

10 Facility Representative Workshop 10 Facility Representative Workshop May 12 - 13, 2010 Las Vegas, NV Facility Rep of the Year Award | Attendees | Summary Report Workshop Agenda and Presentations Day 1: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 8:00 a.m. Opening Remarks James Heffner, Facility Representative Program Manager Earl Hughes, Safety System Oversight Program Manager Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Office of Health, Safety and Security 8:15 a.m. Welcome from the Nevada Site Office John Mallin, Deputy Assistant Manager for Site Operations Nevada Site Office 8:30 a.m. Workshop Keynote Address Todd Lapointe Chief of Nuclear Safety Central Technical Authority Staff 9:15 a.m. Facility Representative and Safety System Oversight Award Ceremony James Heffner, Facility Representative Program Manager

252

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 561: Waste Disposal Areas, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

CAU 561 comprises 10 CASs: (1) 01-19-01, Waste Dump; (2) 02-08-02, Waste Dump and Burn Area; (3) 03-19-02, Debris Pile; (4) 05-62-01, Radioactive Gravel Pile; (5) 12-23-09, Radioactive Waste Dump; (6) 22-19-06, Buried Waste Disposal Site; (7) 23-21-04, Waste Disposal Trenches ; (8) 25-08-02, Waste Dump; (9) 25-23-21, Radioactive Waste Dump; and (10) 25-25-19, Hydrocarbon Stains and Trench. The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation for closure of CAU 561 with no further corrective action. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill the following data needs as defined during the DQO process: (1) Determine whether COCs are present; (2) If COCs are present, determine their nature and extent; and (3) Provide sufficient information and data to complete appropriate corrective actions. The following contaminants were determined to be present at concentrations exceeding their corresponding FALs: (1) No contamination exceeding FALs was identified at CASs 01-19-01, 03-19-02, 05-62-01, 12-23-09, and 22-19-06. (2) The surface and subsurface soil within the burn area at CAS 02-08-02 contains arsenic and lead above the FALs of 23 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) and 800 mg/kg, respectively. The surface and subsurface soil within the burn area also contains melted lead slag (potential source material [PSM]). The soil within the waste piles contains polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) above the FALs. The contamination within the burn area is spread throughout the area, as it was not feasible to remove all the PSM (melted lead), while at the waste piles, the contamination is confined to the piles. (3) The surface and subsurface soils within Trenches 3 and 5 at CAS 23-21-04 contain arsenic and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) above the FALs of 23 mg/kg and 0.74 mg/kg, respectively. The soil was removed from both trenches, and the soil that remains at this CAS does not contain contamination exceeding the FALs. Lead bricks and counterweights were also removed, and the soil below these items does not contain contamination that exceeds the FAL for lead. (4) The concrete-like material at CAS 25-08-02 contains arsenic above the FAL of 23 mg/kg. This concrete-like material was removed, and the soil that remains at this CAS does not contain contamination exceeding the FALs. Lead-acid batteries were also removed, and the soil below the batteries does not contain contamination that exceeds the FAL for lead. (5) The surface soils within the main waste dump at the posted southern radioactive material area (RMA) at CAS 25-23-21 contain cesium (Cs)-137 and PCBs above the FALs of 72.9 picocuries per gram (pCi/g) and 0.74 mg/kg, respectively. The soil was removed from the RMA, and the soil that remains at this CAS does not contain contamination exceeding the FALs. (6) The surface and subsurface soils at CAS 25-25-19 do not contain contamination exceeding the FALs. In addition, lead bricks were removed, and the soil below these items does not contain contamination that exceeds the FAL for lead. The following best management practices were implemented: (1) Housekeeping debris at CASs 02-08-02, 23-21-04, 25-08-02, 25-23-21, and 25-25-19 was removed and disposed of; (2) The open trenches at CAS 23-21-04 were backfilled; (3) The waste piles at CAS 25-08-02 were removed and the area leveled to ground surface; and (4) The remaining waste piles at the main waste dump at CAS 25-23-21 were leveled to ground surface. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: (1) No further action for CASs 01-19-01, 03-19-02, 05-62-01, 12-23-09, and 22-19-06; (2) Closure in place with an FFACO use restriction (UR) at CAS 02-08-02 for the remaining PAH-, arsenic-, and lead-contaminated soil, and the melted lead PSM. The UR form and map have been filed in the NNSA/NSO Facility Information Management System, the FFACO database, and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files; (3) No further corrective action at CAS 23-21-04, as the lead bricks and counterweights (PSM) have been removed, and the COCs of arsenic and PCBs in soil have be

Mark Krauss

2011-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

253

Decision Summaries  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

oha/decision-summaries Office of Hearings and Appeals oha/decision-summaries Office of Hearings and Appeals 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC, 20585 202-287-1566 en Summary of Decisions - December 30, 2013 - January 3, 2014 http://energy.gov/oha/articles/summary-decisions-december-30-2013-january-3-2014 decisions-december-30-2013-january-3-2014" class="title-link">Summary of Decisions - December 30, 2013 - January 3, 2014

254

Chemical Sciences Division: National Facilities & Centers  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

& CENTERS RESEARCH STUDENT & POSTDOCTORAL OPPORTUNITIES NEWS & EVENTS CSD CONTACTS LBNL HOME Privacy & Security Notice DOE UC Berkeley National Facilities and Centers Chemical...

255

Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement - Nuclear Facility...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement - Nuclear Facility (CMRR-NF SEIS) | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing...

256

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 31, 2013 July 31, 2013 PSH-13-0033 - In the Matter of Personnel Security On July 31, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that a security clearance should not be granted to an individual. The individual disclosed during his background investigation that in 2005-06 he had been charged for battery as a result of a dispute with a neighbor, domestic violence as a result of an altercation with his then-wife, and driving under the influence of alcohol. Beginning in 2007, the individual had separately attended court-mandated domestic violence counseling and alcohol treatment programs. July 26, 2013 PSH-13-0044 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 26 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be

257

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 20, 2012 June 20, 2012 PSH-12-0044 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is a contractor employee at a DOE facility and has possessed a security clearance on various occasions since 1978. Exhibit (Ex.) 8 at 2. In December 2011, the Individual reported to the Local Security Office (LSO) that his wages were being garnished for back federal taxes. Ex. 13 at 1. Consequently, the LSO conducted a personnel security interview (PSI) with the Individual in January 2012. Ex. 15. June 13, 2012 PSH-12-0010 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual works for a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor and is an applicant for DOE access authorization. In August 2010, the individual completed a Questionnaire for National Security Positions (QNSP) and was

258

Robust Decision Making  

SciTech Connect

The Idaho National Laboratory (INL) is funded through the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy and other customers who have direct contracts with the Laboratory. The people, equipment, facilities and other infrastructure at the laboratory require continual investment to maintain and improve the laboratorys capabilities. With ever tightening federal and customer budgets, the ability to direct investments into the people, equipment, facilities and other infrastructure which are most closely aligned with the laboratorys mission and customers goals grows increasingly more important. The ability to justify those investment decisions based on objective criteria that can withstand political, managerial and technical criticism also becomes increasingly more important. The Systems Engineering tools of decision analysis, risk management and roadmapping, when properly applied to such problems, can provide defensible decisions.

Christopher A. Dieckmann, PE, CSEP-Acq

2010-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

259

RCRA Permit for a Hazardous Waste Management Facility Permit Number NEV HW0101 Annual Summary/Waste Minimization Report Calendar Year 2012, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) identification number of each generator from which the Permittee received a waste stream, a description and quantity of each waste stream in tons and cubic feet received at the facility, the method of treatment, storage, and/or disposal for each waste stream, a description of the waste minimization efforts undertaken, a description of the changes in volume and toxicity of waste actually received, any unusual occurrences, and the results of tank integrity assessments. This Annual Summary/Waste Minimization Report is prepared in accordance with Section 2.13.3 of Permit Number NEV HW0101, issued 10/17/10.

,

2013-02-21T23:59:59.000Z

260

Nevada National Security Site | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Nevada National Security Site Nevada National Security Site Nevada National Security Site Crews perform demolition of the R-MAD facility. R-MAD is one of several Nevada National Security Site facilities which supported the nuclear rocket program that ended in 1973 Crews perform demolition of the R-MAD facility. R-MAD is one of several Nevada National Security Site facilities which supported the nuclear rocket program that ended in 1973 Waste management specialists disposed approximately 1.8 million cubic feet of low-level and mixed low-level radioactive waste at the Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site, which amounts to 2,558 shipments and 13,173 packages of waste. These volumes constitute approximately 5 percent of the low-level and mixed low-level waste generated throughout DOE complex. This photo shows Area 5 waste disposal operations

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Physical Security System Sensitivity to DBT Perturbations  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This thesis examines how perturbing selected adversary capabilities in a design basis threat (DBT) may affect the assessment of a facility's security system performance. We found that using a strictly defined DBT to design and analytically test facility security systems can lead to invalid assessments that security measures are meeting standards. Design Basis Threats are intended to represent the most severe yet realistic attack a facility might face. However, the static nature of the standard DBT makes it unable to test the performance of a facility security system in the case where a specialized adversary may possess different capabilities than defined in the DBT. Our analysis of security system performance for various modeled facilities revealed significant vulnerabilities to certain perturbations of adversary capabilities. These vulnerabilities went undetected when the original strictly defined graded DBT was used in the assessment procedure. By maximizing one adversary capability at the expense of others, a specialized adversary force was able to efficiently defeat each facility. To address this problem, we proposed employing a so-called "point-based" DBT as an alternative to the existing strictly defined DBT. In a point-based DBT, multiple scenarios are assessed that test different sets of adversary capabilities to better uncover and understand any security system vulnerabilities that may exist. We believe the benefit of identifying these site-specific security vulnerabilities will outweigh the additional cost of generating a point-based DBT, especially if the vulnerabilities are identified during the initial design of the security system.

Conchewski, Curtis

2012-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

262

Cyber Security | National Security | ORNL  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

National Security Home | Science & Discovery | National Security | Initiatives | Cyber Security SHARE Cyber Security Through Science A Science-Based Approach image ORNL uses a science-based approach that combines experimentation, theory, modeling, and high performance computing to solve some of the nation's cyber security grand challenges. Significant, 'game-changing' transformation requires a science-based approach that combines fundamental understanding with experimentation, theory, and modeling. The most successful scientific programs use peer review to maximize intellectual capital and prioritize research needs. The Department of Energy has applied this approach through programs such as the Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) and ASCI,

263

Oversight Reports - Y-12 National Security Complex | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Y-12 National Security Complex Y-12 National Security Complex Oversight Reports - Y-12 National Security Complex Independent Oversight Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex - May 2013 Appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility Safety Basis Preliminary Safety Design Report Process at the Y-12 National Security Complex Independent Activity Report, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Public Meeting - October 2012 Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Public Meeting on the Status of Integration of Safety Into the Design of the Uranium Processing Facility [HIAR-Y-12-2012-10-02] Independent Oversight Assessment, Y-12 National Security Complex - June 2012 Assessment of Nuclear Safety Culture at the Y-12 National Security Complex Uranium Processing Facility Project Independent Oversight Review, Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC

264

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April 19, 2013 April 19, 2013 PSH-13-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing DOE should not grant an individual access authorization. As security concerns under 10 CFR Part 710, a Local Security Office (LSO) cited the individual's history of criminal conduct, financial problems, and past use of alcohol habitually to excess. The LSO also cited the report of a DOE Psychologist, in which he identified the individual's lack of control over his spending and use of alcohol as a mental condition that causes a significant defect in his judgment and reliability. April 17, 2013 PSH-12-0143 - In the Matter of Personnel Security On April 17, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should not restore an individual's access authorization. As security concerns under Criteria H, J, and L of 10 CFR

265

SecureBox: National Security Through Secure Cargo Team Members  

SecureBox: National Security Through Secure Cargo Team Members: Front Row (left to right): Howard Lowdermilk, Greg Dallum, Faranak Nekoogar, Vickie ...

266

Technologies for Remote Monitoring of Substation Assets: Physical Security  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report assesses the benefits of including remote monitoring with the various security technologies used for providing physical security to substation facilities and equipment. This remote monitoring provides near-real-time security information on the access points to substation facilities as well as the status and health of equipment to determine if the equipment has been tampered with or is otherwise not functioning correctly. The types of security technologies include locks at gates and doors, vid...

2006-03-13T23:59:59.000Z

267

Secure videoconferencing equipment switching system and method  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

A switching system and method are provided to facilitate use of videoconference facilities over a plurality of security levels. The system includes a switch coupled to a plurality of codecs and communication networks. Audio/Visual peripheral components are connected to the switch. The switch couples control and data signals between the Audio/Visual peripheral components and one but nor both of the plurality of codecs. The switch additionally couples communication networks of the appropriate security level to each of the codecs. In this manner, a videoconferencing facility is provided for use on both secure and non-secure networks.

Hansen, Michael E. (Livermore, CA)

2009-01-13T23:59:59.000Z

268

Safety, Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Safety, Security Safety, Security Safety, Security LANL's mission is to develop and apply science and technology to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. nuclear deterrent; reduce global threats; and solve other emerging national security and energy challenges. Contact Operator Los Alamos National Laboratory (505) 667-5061 We do not compromise safety for personal, programmatic, or operational reasons. Safety: we integrate safety, security, and environmental concerns into every step of our work Our commitments We conduct our work safely and responsibly to achieve our mission. We ensure a safe and healthful environment for workers, contractors, visitors, and other on-site personnel. We protect the health, safety, and welfare of the general public. We do not compromise safety for personal, programmatic, or

269

Transportation Security  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

For Review Only 1 Transportation Security Draft Annotated Bibliography Review July 2007 Preliminary Draft - For Review Only 2 Work Plan Task * TEC STG Work Plan, dated 8206,...

270

Global Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

transparency, and security that are preconditions to the ultimate fulfillment of the Non-Proliferation Treaty's goals and ambitions. Open Source Center The Open Source Center...

271

Security Automation Conference & Workshop  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Security Automation Conference & Workshop. ... Richard Hale, DISA - Information Security & Security Automation in DoD (coming soon); ...

272

HIPAA Security Rule  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Related ActivitiesHIPAA Security RuleHealth Information Exchange (HIE) Security Architecture. Related ... HIPAA Security Rule. NIST ...

2011-11-21T23:59:59.000Z

273

Security Enforcement Reporting Criteria  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Classified Information Security Noncompliance Reporting Criteria January 2012 MANDATORY SECURITY INCIDENT REPORTING Classified information security noncompliances are categorized...

274

Security-by-design handbook.  

SciTech Connect

This document is a draft SecuritybyDesign (SeBD) handbook produced to support the Work Plan of the Nuclear Security Summit to share best practices for nuclear security in new facility design. The Work Plan calls on States to %E2%80%9Cencourage nuclear operators and architect/engineering firms to take into account and incorporate, where appropriate, effective measures of physical protection and security culture into the planning, construction, and operation of civilian nuclear facilities and provide technical assistance, upon request, to other States in doing so.%E2%80%9D The materials for this document were generated primarily as part of a bilateral project to produce a SeBD handbook as a collaboration between the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) Nuclear Nonproliferation Science and Technology Center and Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), which represented the US Department Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) under a Project Action Sheet PASPP04. Input was also derived based on tours of the Savannah River Site (SRS) and Japan Nuclear Fuel Limited (JNFL) Rokkasho Mixed Oxide Fuel fabrication facilities and associated project lessonslearned. For the purposes of the handbook, SeBD will be described as the systemlevel incorporation of the physical protection system (PPS) into a new nuclear power plant or nuclear facility resulting in a PPS design that minimizes the risk of malicious acts leading to nuclear material theft; nuclear material sabotage; and facility sabotage as much as possible through features inherent in (or intrinsic to) the design of the facility. A fourelement strategy is presented to achieve a robust, durable, and responsive security system.

Snell, Mark Kamerer; Jaeger, Calvin Dell; Scharmer, Carol; Jordan, Sabina Erteza; Tanuma, Koji [Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai-mura, Ibaraki, Japan; Ochiai, Kazuya [Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai-mura, Ibaraki, Japan; Iida, Toru [Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai-mura, Ibaraki, Japan

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

275

Lab announces security changes  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lab announces security changes Lab announces security changes The Laboratory is implementing several changes to its security procedures as the result of a recent security...

276

Office of Secure Transportation Activities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

16th, 2012 16th, 2012 WIPP Knoxville, TN OFFICE OF SECURE TRANSPORTATION Agency Integration Briefing Our Mission To provide safe and secure ground and air transportation of nuclear weapons, nuclear weapons components, and special nuclear materials and conduct other missions supporting the national security of the United States of America. 3 5 OST's Commitment to Transportation Safety and Security Over three decades of safe, secure transport of nuclear weapons and special nuclear material to and from military locations and DOE facilities More than 140 million miles traveled Over three decades and 240,000 flight hours of accident-free flying Professionalism We conduct ourselves and our operations with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.

277

Chapter_1_Physical_Security  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Physical Security Physical Security This chapter describes the security procedures adopted by DOE HQ to implement the requirements of the following DOE directives: * Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 860.4 * Title 41 CFR Parts 101-19.3 and 102.74, Subpart C * Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD)-12, Policy for a Common Identification Standard for Federal Employees and Contractors * DOE Order 473.3, Protection Program Operations * DOE Order 471.6, Information Security * DOE Order 580.1, Change 1, DOE Personal Property Management Program The objective of these directives is to protect DOE sensitive and classified information, facilities, property, and employees from threats posed by intelligence collectors, terrorists, violent activists,

278

Welcome to the Kansas City Field Office | National Nuclear Security...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Value our employees and their contributions Minimize risk to the Public and the environment while providing a safe and secure working environment Protect NNSA facilities and...

279

Personnel Security Program | National Nuclear Security Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Personnel Security Program Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nuclear Security > Personnel Security...

280

Office of Headquarters Security Operations: Headquarters Security...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Headquarters Security Operations Home Sub Offices HQ Security Officers (HSO) Program Office of Information Security Office of Headquarters Personnel Office of...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Meeting Federal Energy Security Requirements  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Markel Markel SRA International Lawrence_Markel@sra.com Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Fall 2012 - October 16-17 Mobile, AL Sponsored by Alabama Power Theme Meeting energy security requirements in federal facilities provides opportunities for additional types of cooperation between utilities and the federal agencies. However, there are significant barriers to pursuing these opportunities - constraints on utilities and on federal agencies, as well as sometimes-competing objectives. Energy security encompasses sufficiency, surety, and sustainability.  Above all, energy security means having adequate power to conduct critical operations for the duration required (sufficiency).  Secondarily, and leading to sufficiency, is ensuring resilient energy supplies that are accessible when

282

Facility Representatives  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

063-2011 063-2011 February 2011 Superseding DOE-STD-1063-2006 April 2006 DOE STANDARD FACILITY REPRESENTATIVES U.S. Department of Energy AREA MGMT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1063-2011 ii Available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web site at http://www.hss.doe.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ DOE-STD-1063-2011 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) standard is approved for use by all DOE/National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Components. 2. The revision to this DOE standard was developed by a working group consisting of headquarters and field participants. Beneficial comments (recommendations,

283

The Problem of Redundancy Problem: Why More Nuclear Security Forces May Produce Less Nuclear Security. Risk Analysis 24  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, many scholars, journalists, and public officials expressed fear about the security of nuclear facilities in the

Scott D. Sagan

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

284

Energy Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Energy Security Energy Security Energy Security LANL's mission is to develop and apply science and technology to ensure the safety, security, and effectiveness of the U.S. nuclear deterrent; reduce global threats; and solve other emerging national security and energy challenges. April 12, 2012 A closed photobioreactor system is essentially a series of plastic or glass containers for water and algae. A closed photobioreactor system is essentially a series of plastic or glass containers for water and algae. Proponents of such bioreactors (compared to open ponds) say the growth environment can be more easily controlled; they prevent evaporation; and light penetrates through all sides of the container, which increases cell density. However, bioreactors suffer high materials and energy costs as well as mixing and gas-exchange

285

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

29, 2012 29, 2012 PSH-12-0097 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 29, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be restored. The Individual had been charged with committing a sexual battery. Although the Individual had testified that a jury had acquitted him of this charge, the Individual did not provide any documentation that he had been acquitted. Nor had the Individual presented sufficient evidence to resolve the concerns raised by his conduct. The Individual had also intentionally provided misleading information during a personnel security interview. November 29, 2012 PSH-12-0080 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 29, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she

286

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2013 9, 2013 PSH-13-0052 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 9, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should be restored. A DOE Psychiatrist had found that the individual suffered from alcohol abuse. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual mitigated these security concerns at the hearing by presenting evidence that he had more than fully complied with the DOE Psychiatrist's treatment recommendations and the treatment has been effective. Steven Fine - Hearing Officer July 3, 2013 PSH-13-0048 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 3, 2013, a Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which he determined that an individual's access authorization should be restored. In reaching

287

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 23, 2013 May 23, 2013 PSH-13-0018 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On May 23, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be granted. The Individual had a history of six arrests, five of which were alcohol-related and two of which were marijuana-related. In addition, A DOE Psychologist diagnosed the individual with Alcohol Dependence. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not mitigated any the security concerns raised by his alcohol abuse and history of criminal conduct at the hearing, because he was only in the early stages of his recovery from his alcohol d May 22, 2013 PSH-13-0022 - In the Matter of Personnel Security On May 22, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he

288

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 1, 2013 November 1, 2013 PSH-13-0092 - In the Matter of Personnel Security On November 1, 2013, a Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which he determined that an individual's access authorization should not be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not resolved security concerns regarding the Criterion L concerns arising from his lengthy history of financial irresponsibility and his failure to timely comply with an information request regarding his financial status. October 29, 2013 PSH-13-0086 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 29, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should be restored. The Record showed that the individual had two DUIs and that a

289

Standards Applicability to Honeywell Metropolis Works Uranium Conversion Facility and  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The purpose of this paper is to provide the Commission options and a staff recommendation for regulating chemical security at U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulated facilities that are exempt from the Department of Homeland Securitys (DHS) Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS). SUMMARY:

R. W. Borchardt

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

290

Y-12 National Security Complex - Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Reports Reports Y-12 National Security Complex Review Reports 2013 Independent Oversight Appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility Safety Basis Preliminary Safety Design Report Process at the Y-12 National Security Complex, May 2013 Review Reports 2012 Review of the Long Lead Procurement Processed Used by Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC for the Uranium Processing Facility Project, July 2012 Assessment of Nuclear Safety Culture at the Y-12 National Security Complex Uranium Processing Facility Project, June 2012 Review of the Y-12 Implementation Verification Review Processes, June 2012 Targeted Review of Site Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Y-12 National Security Complex, February 2012 Office of Nuclear Safety Enforcement Regulatory Assistance Review of B&W Technical Services Y-12, LLC at the Y-12 National Security Complex, January 20, 2012

291

Ideal based cyber security technical metrics for control systems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Much of the world's critical infrastructure is at risk from attack through electronic networks connected to control systems. Security metrics are important because they provide the basis for management decisions that affect the protection of the ... Keywords: control system security, cyber security metrics

Wayne Boyer; Miles McQueen

2007-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

292

Facility stabilization project, fiscal year 1998 -- Multi-year workplan (MYWP) for WBS 1.4  

SciTech Connect

The primary Facility Stabilization mission is to provide minimum safe surveillance and maintenance of facilities and deactivate facilities on the Hanford Site, to reduce risks to workers, the public and environment, transition the facilities to a low cost, long term surveillance and maintenance state, and to provide safe and secure storage of special nuclear materials, nuclear materials, and nuclear fuel. Facility Stabilization will protect the health and safety of the public and workers, protect the environment and provide beneficial use of the facilities and other resources. Work will be in accordance with the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (Tri-Party Agreement), local, national, international and other agreements, and in compliance with all applicable Federal, state, and local laws. The stakeholders will be active participants in the decision processes including establishing priorities, and in developing a consistent set of rules, regulations, and laws. The work will be leveraged with a view of providing positive, lasting economic impact in the region. Effectiveness, efficiency, and discipline in all mission activities will enable Hanford Site to achieve its mission in a continuous and substantive manner. As the mission for Facility Stabilization has shifted from production to support of environmental restoration, each facility is making a transition to support the Site mission. The mission goals include the following: (1) Achieve deactivation of facilities for transfer to EM-40, using Plutonium Uranium Extraction (PUREX) plant deactivation as a model for future facility deactivation; (2) Manage nuclear materials in a safe and secure condition and where appropriate, in accordance with International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards rules; (3) Treat nuclear materials as necessary, and store onsite in long-term interim safe storage awaiting a final disposition decision by US Department of Energy; (4) Implement nuclear materials disposition directives. In the near term these are anticipated to mostly involve transferring uranium to other locations for beneficial use. Work will be in accordance with the Tri-Party Agreement, and other agreements and in compliance with all applicable Federal, state and local laws. The transition to deactivation will be accomplished through a phased approach, while maintaining the facilities in a safe and compliant configuration. In addition, Facility Stabilization will continue to maintain safe long-term storage facilities for Special Nuclear Material (SNM), Nuclear Material (NM), and Nuclear Fuel (NF). The FSP deactivation strategy aligns with the deactivate facilities mission outlined in Hanford Site SE documentation. Inherent to the FSP strategies are specific Hanford Strategic Plan success indicators such as: reduction of risks to workers, the public and environment; increasing the amount of resources recovered for other uses; reduction/elimination of inventory and materials; and reduction/elimination of costly mortgages.

Floberg, W.C.

1997-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

293

Record of Decision (ROD) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Record of Decision (ROD) Record of Decision (ROD) Record of Decision (ROD) A concise public document that records a Federal agency's decision(s) concerning a proposed action for which the agency has prepared an environmental impact statement (See CEQ and DOE NEPA regulations at 40 CFR 1505.2 and 10 CFR 1021.315, respectively). If you have any trouble finding a specific document, please contact AskNEPA@hq.doe.gov for assistance. Documents Available for Download April 12, 1995 EIS-0082: Record of Decision Defense Waste Processing Facility at the Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina February 22, 1995 EIS-0219: Record of Decision Stabilization of Plutonium Solutions Stored in the F- Canyon Facility at the Savannah River Site, Aiken, SC February 22, 1995 EIS-0219: Record of Decision

294

ENERGY SECURITY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

national strategy for national strategy for ENERGY SECURITY recommendations to the nation on reducing u.s. oil dependence september 2008 a project of a project of a national strategy for energy security Recommendations to the Nation on Reducing U.S. Oil Dependence september 2008 Table of Contents 2 Energy Security Leadership Council 3 Statement of Purpose 4 Letter to the President, the Congress, and the American People 7 Outline of Main Body of Report 13 Introduction 21 Policy Recommendations: Summary 33 Part I · Diversify Energy Supplies for the Transportation Sector

295

Security-by-design handbook.  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document is a draft SecuritybyDesign (SeBD) handbook produced to support the Work Plan of the Nuclear Security Summit to share best practices for nuclear security in new facility design. The Work Plan calls on States to %E2%80%9Cencourage nuclear operators and architect/engineering firms to take into account and incorporate, where appropriate, effective measures of physical protection and security culture into the planning, construction, and operation of civilian nuclear facilities and provide technical assistance, upon request, to other States in doing so.%E2%80%9D The materials for this document were generated primarily as part of a bilateral project to produce a SeBD handbook as a collaboration between the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) Nuclear Nonproliferation Science and Technology Center and Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), which represented the US Department Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) under a Project Action Sheet PASPP04. Input was also derived based on tours of the Savannah River Site (SRS) and Japan Nuclear Fuel Limited (JNFL) Rokkasho Mixed Oxide Fuel fabrication facilities and associated project lessonslearned. For the purposes of the handbook, SeBD will be described as the systemlevel incorporation of the physical protection system (PPS) into a new nuclear power plant or nuclear facility resulting in a PPS design that minimizes the risk of malicious acts leading to nuclear material theft; nuclear material sabotage; and facility sabotage as much as possible through features inherent in (or intrinsic to) the design of the facility. A fourelement strategy is presented to achieve a robust, durable, and responsive security system.

Snell, Mark Kamerer; Jaeger, Calvin Dell; Scharmer, Carol; Jordan, Sabina Erteza; Tanuma, Koji [Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai-mura, Ibaraki, Japan; Ochiai, Kazuya [Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai-mura, Ibaraki, Japan; Iida, Toru [Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai-mura, Ibaraki, Japan

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

296

Security Rulemaking  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION STAKEHOLDERS FORUM 2 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION STAKEHOLDERS FORUM Knoxville, TN - May 16, 2012 2 NRC Actions Since September 11, 2001 * Interim solution - enhance existing regulations through Security Orders * Objectives of the Orders are enhanced control of material to - Prevent unauthorized access - Prevent malevolent use of material - Mitigate consequences * Orders were issued to NRC licensees that transport: - Spent Nuclear Fuel - IAEA Code of Conduct Category 1 and 2 quantities of radioactive material Security Rulemakings 3 NRC Ongoing Activities * Orders are an interim measure * Long-term approach is to enhance transport security through public rulemaking * Rulemaking process in progress for - SNF Transportation Security - Physical Protection of Category 1 and 2 material (both fixed

297

Facility automation for retail facilities  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This article will focus on retail chain stores with areas of 22,000 to 75,000 sq ft, but much of the article will apply to all retail stores independent of size. Typically, a store is serviced by 5 to 15 rooftop HVAC units with a total cooling capacity of 50 to 150 tons, depending on the floor area and geographic location. The interior lighting represents a load of 80 to 300 KW with three lighting levels--retail, stocking, and security or night. Most stores are located in strip centers, and therefore, the parking lot lighting is provided by the landlord, but each store does control and service its own sign lighting. Generally, the total load controlled by an FAS represents 130 to 450 KW with corresponding annual energy costs ranging from $65,000 to $200,000 (natural gas and electricity), depending on the size of the store and the local unit costs of energy. Historical utility data, electrical and mechanical drawings, site surveys, significant analyses of data, and most importantly, discussions with corporate facilities management personnel and store operations personnel provide the source for the development theory and sequence of operation of the design of the facility automation systems for retail stores. The three main goals of an FAS are: reduce utility operating costs, maintain comfort levels during occupied hours, reduce HVAC maintenance costs.

Ameduri, G. (Roth Bros., Inc., Youngstown, OH (United States). Facilities Automation Division)

1994-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

298

Transportation Security | ornl.gov  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Transportation Security SHARE Global Threat Reduction Initiative Transportation Security Cooperation Secure Transport Operations (STOP) Box Security of radioactive material while...

299

Federal Facility Reporting | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Facility Reporting Federal Facility Reporting Federal Facility Reporting October 8, 2013 - 1:59pm Addthis Various legal authorities require agencies to report data on energy and water consumption and resource management efforts within Federal facilities. The Federal Energy Management Program collects this data to assess agency performance toward mandated goals on agency Energy/Sustainability Scorecards and presents it in annual reports to Congress. Find Federal facility reporting information related to: Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007, Section 432, Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements: View information about requirements and data collected to track Federal facility compliance with requirements for performing facility evaluations, implementing and

300

Security Sciences Field Lab (SSFL) | ORNL  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Nuclear Science Nuclear Science Research Areas Research Highlights Facilities and Capabilities Educational Outreach Publications and Reports News and Awards Nuclear Science Home | Science & Discovery | Nuclear Science | Facilities and Capabilities SHARE Security Sciences Field Laboratory May 30, 2013 The Security Sciences Field Laboratory (SSFL) is designed to support testing and evaluation of a wide range of intrusion detection, assessment, surveillance, and peripheral physical security equipment including: sensors; cameras; alarm communication and display; power generation; access control; unattended stand-alone, remote communication; unmanned aerial and activated delay systems. At the heart of SSFL is a simulated border region of varied terrain such as open grassy fields, hilly wooded areas, sand

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

EIS-0387: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Record of Decision Record of Decision EIS-0387: Record of Decision Y-12 National Security Complex The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is issuing this Record of Decision (ROD) for the Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee based on information and analyses contained in the Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Y-12 National Security Complex, DOE/EIS-0387 (Y-12 Final SWEIS, Y-12 SWEIS or 2011 Y- 12 SWEIS) issued on March 4, 2011; comments on the Draft and Final Y-12 SWEIS; and other factors, including costs, security considerations and the missions of NNSA. EIS-0387_ROD_2011.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-0387: DOE Notice of Availability of the Final Site-Wide Environmental

302

Security Automation Considered Harmful? W. Keith Edwards Erika Shehan Poole Jennifer Stoll  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Security Automation Considered Harmful? W. Keith Edwards Erika Shehan Poole Jennifer Stoll School link in information security. Because of this perception, a growing body of research and commercial activity is focused on automated approaches to security. With these approaches, security decisions

Edwards, Keith

303

Facility Centered Assessment of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Science and Technology Operations - Facility Operations Director Managed Facilities, August 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review Report Review Report Facility Centered Assessment of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Science and Technology Operations - Facility Operations Director Managed Facilities May 2011 August 2011 Office of Health, Safety and Security Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Table of Contents Background ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Results ........................................................................................................................................................... 2 Conduct of the FCA ......................................................................................................................... 2

304

Facility Centered Assessment of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Science and Technology Operations - Facility Operations Director Managed Facilities, August 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Review Report Review Report Facility Centered Assessment of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Science and Technology Operations - Facility Operations Director Managed Facilities May 2011 August 2011 Office of Health, Safety and Security Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Table of Contents Background ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Results ........................................................................................................................................................... 2 Conduct of the FCA ......................................................................................................................... 2

305

National Security Technology Center | Y-12 National Security...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Global Security Security and Training National Security ... National Security Technology Center What kinds of security technologies are we talking about? See our capabilities...

306

PSH-12-0135 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0135 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On February 12, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he...

307

PSH-12-0135 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

35 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0135 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On February 12, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which...

308

PSH-13-0076 - In the Matter of Personnel Security | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

In the Matter of Personnel Security PSH-13-0076 - In the Matter of Personnel Security On August 27, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision finding that the individual...

309

PSH-13-0050 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Personnel Security Hearing PSH-13-0050 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On August 9, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the...

310

PSH-13-0049 - In the Matter of Personnel Security | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

In the Matter of Personnel Security PSH-13-0049 - In the Matter of Personnel Security On August 30, 2013, a Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which he determined that an...

311

PSH-13-0026 - In the Matter of Personnel Security | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

In the Matter of Personnel Security PSH-13-0026 - In the Matter of Personnel Security On August 13, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she concluded that an...

312

PSH-13-0068 - In the Matter of Personnel Security | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

In the Matter of Personnel Security PSH-13-0068 - In the Matter of Personnel Security On August 30, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the...

313

PSH-13-0056 - In the Matter of Personnel Security | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

In the Matter of Personnel Security PSH-13-0056 - In the Matter of Personnel Security On August 13, 2013, a Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which he determined that an...

314

PSH-12-0060 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0060 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On September 14, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which...

315

Tag: security | Y-12 National Security Complex  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

security security Tag: security Displaying 1 - 5 of 5... Category: Security Security Y-12 places the highest priority on maintaining and improving its security posture. More... Category: News Johnson shares perspective on security Rod Johnson, B&W Y-12 deputy general manager of Security, recently discussed the security atmosphere since his arrival last August and what he sees as Y-12's security future. More... Category: News Y-12 to Install New Fence to Reduce Trespassing The National Nuclear Security Administration today announced plans to extend the boundary fence at the Y-12 National Security Complex along Scarboro Road. The new fence is expected to be in place by April 4. More... Category: News New institute promotes nuclear security Y-12 is partnering with the University of Tennessee and others to provide

316

Addendum to the Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 372: Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

This document constitutes an addendum to the Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 372: Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (Revision 0), April 2011.

Patrick Matthews and Christy Sloop

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

317

Transportation Security  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

For Review Only 1 Transportation Security Draft Annotated Bibliography Review July 2007 Preliminary Draft - For Review Only 2 Work Plan Task * TEC STG Work Plan, dated 8/2/06, Product #16, stated: "Develop an annotated bibliography of publicly-available documents related to security of radioactive material transportation." * Earlier this year, a preliminary draft annotated bibliography on this topic was developed by T-REX , UNM, to initially address this STG Work Plan Task. Preliminary Draft - For Review Only 3 Considerations in Determining Release of Information * Some "Publicly-available" documents could potentially contain inappropriate information according to standards set by DOE information security policy and DOE Guides. - Such documents would not be freely

318

Message Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Message Message Security Services Overview ECS Audio/Video Conferencing Fasterdata IPv6 Network Network Performance Tools (perfSONAR) ESnet OID Registry PGP Key Service Virtual Circuits (OSCARS) OSCARS Case Study Documentation User Manual FAQ Design Specifications Functional Specifications Notifications Publications Authorization Policy Default Attributes Message Security Clients For Developers Interfaces Links Hardware Requirements DOE Grids Service Transition Contact Us Technical Assistance: 1 800-33-ESnet (Inside the US) 1 800-333-7638 (Inside the US) 1 510-486-7600 (Globally) 1 510-486-7607 (Globally) Report Network Problems: trouble@es.net Provide Web Site Feedback: info@es.net Message Security Overview The OSCARS Web pages and Web Services are run within a Tomcat container which uses SSL connections to encrypt all messages. The OSCARS Web Service

319

Secure NEPA Documents | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Secure NEPA Documents Secure NEPA Documents Secure NEPA Documents The Department of Energy (DOE) limits electronic access to certain NEPA documents on this website due to the potential security sensitivity of some information these documents may contain. DOE regrets any inconvenience caused by this decision, which reflects an awareness of the need to protect the public. Requesting Secure NEPA Documents You may request copies of documents by e-mail or by leaving a message on our toll-free information line at 1-800-472-2756. Please provide the following information in your request: Title and Number of Document requested First Name: Last Name: Address: City: State: Zip Code: Organization (If Applicable): E-mail: Phone: List of Secure NEPA Documents May 1, 1984 EIS-0108: Final Environmental Impact Statement

320

Security Hearing FAQs | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Services » Hearings » Security Hearing FAQs Services » Hearings » Security Hearing FAQs Security Hearing FAQs (1) What is the purpose of the hearing? The purpose of the hearing is to provide you with an opportunity to respond to the DOE's questions concerning your eligibility to hold a security clearance ("security concerns"), as outlined in the Statement of Charges attached to the Notification Letter. During the hearing, you will be able to present evidence to explain, refute or mitigate the derogatory information cited in the Statement of Charges. After the hearing, the Hearing Officer will review the testimonial and documentary evidence in the record, and issue a Decision which contains findings of fact and a determination whether or not to grant or restore your security clearance.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Secure NEPA Documents | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Secure NEPA Documents Secure NEPA Documents Secure NEPA Documents The Department of Energy (DOE) limits electronic access to certain NEPA documents on this website due to the potential security sensitivity of some information these documents may contain. DOE regrets any inconvenience caused by this decision, which reflects an awareness of the need to protect the public. Requesting Secure NEPA Documents You may request copies of documents by e-mail or by leaving a message on our toll-free information line at 1-800-472-2756. Please provide the following information in your request: Title and Number of Document requested First Name: Last Name: Address: City: State: Zip Code: Organization (If Applicable): E-mail: Phone: List of Secure NEPA Documents April 1, 2007 EIS-0376: Final Environmental Impact Statement

322

Allied Security Scholarship ALLIED SECURITY SCHOLARSHIP 2013  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Allied Security Scholarship ALLIED SECURITY SCHOLARSHIP 2013 BACKGROUND The Allied Security Scholarship was established by Allied Security to assist students to undertake full-time study at the University of Waikato. REGULATIONS 1. The Scholarship shall be known as the Allied Security Scholarship. 2

Waikato, University of

323

Contact Us | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

The National Nuclear Security Administration The National Nuclear Security Administration Contact Us Home > Field Offices > Welcome to the Sandia Field Office > Contact Us Contact Us If you have questions about activities at the Sandia Field Office, please contact the SFO Public Affairs Director at (505) 845-5264. Our mailing address is: U. S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, Sandia Field Office, P.O. Box 5400, Albuquerque, NM 87185. Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr General Information About SFO Contact Us Contract Administration & Business Management Emergency Information Facilities & Projects Nuclear Operations Environment, Safety & Health Public Affairs Safeguards & Security Performance and Quality Assurance

324

2011 DOE Safety and Security Enforcement Workshop  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2011 DOE Safety and Security Workshop 2011 DOE Safety and Security Workshop Enforcement Home Registration - CLOSED Agendas Day 1 Agenda and Presentations Day 2 Agenda and Presentations Hotel Information Enforcement Home 2011 DOE Safety and Security Enforcement Workshop Office of Enforcement and Oversight The Office of Health, Safety and Security's (HSS) Office of Enforcement will be hosting its 2011 DOE Safety and Security Enforcement Workshop on the dates and location provided below. When: April 5 - 7, 2011 April 5 and 6 are open to Federal employees and contractors (8 am - 5 pm) April 7 is a half-day session for Federal participants only (8 - 11:30 am) The Energy Facility Contractors Group (EFCOG) Enforcement Coordination Working Group will be holding a meeting on April 7 at the Nevada Support Facility. For more information about that meeting, click here.

325

Facility Energy Decision System (FEDS) Software ...  

Calculates lowest life cycle cost-effective energy systems for all building types; ... Reduces time and labor required to collect, analyze, store, ...

326

Facility Energy Decision System | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

efficiency in a single or multiple buildings, including central energy plants and thermal loops; compare energy savings potential across sites; identify retrofits by selecting...

327

Physical Security Evaluations - Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Summary Report - Independent Oversight Inspection of Safeguards and Security and Cyber Security at the Y-12 Site Office and the Y-12 National Security Complex (U), January...

328

Security for grids  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

S. Kent, R. Atkinson. Security Architecture for the InternetTsudik, S. Tuecke. A Security Architecture for ComputationalComputer and Communications Security Conference, pp. 83-92,

Humphrey, Marty; Thompson, Mary R.; Jackson, Keith R.

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

329

Taxation and Social Security  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Re: Taxation and Social Security Attached is draft chapter11 TAXATION AND SOCIAL SECURITY A substantial fraction ofaspects of social security schemes in a setting in which

Kaplow, Louis

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

330

Security and Elections  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

World Conf. Information Security Education, 2007, pp. 1724;Security andElections IEEE Security & Privacy, 10(5):6467, Sept. -

Bishop, Matt; Peisert, Sean

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

331

Public Reading Facilities | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press...

332

Facilities & Projects | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering...

333

EIS-0345: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Impact Statement (FEIS) (DOEEIS-0345, June 2003). Record of Decision for the Electrical Interconnection of the Plymouth Generating Facility, DOEEIS-0345 (October...

334

EIS-0236: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

(DOE), is issuing this Record of Decision (ROD) for the National Ignition Facility (NIF), a key component of DOE's science-based stewardship of the nation's nuclear weapons...

335

Newest LANL Facility Receives LEED Gold Certification | National...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Newest LANL Facility Receives LEED Gold Certification | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear...

336

Construction on Pantex High Explosives Pressing Facility Reaches...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

on Pantex High Explosives Pressing Facility Reaches 85% Mark | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the...

337

Management decisions for cogeneration : a survey analysis  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This study explores the underlying factors in the decision by private, private non-profit, and public sector facility owners to invest in cogeneration technology. It employs alpha factor analysis techniques to develop ...

Radcliffe, Robert R.

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

338

Management decisions for cogeneration : executive summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This report summarizes two interdependent studies which explore the underlying factors in the decision by private, private non-profit, and public sector facility owners to invest in cogeneration technology. They employ ...

Radcliffe, Robert R.

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

339

Java Security  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

From the Publisher:With a market share of almost 70%, Java can be rightly called the programming language of the Web. Java security allows transmission of sensitive information, stores sensitive data, ensures that code is from a trusted source, and ensures ...

Madhushree Ganguli

2002-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

340

Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - August 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August August 2012 Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - August 2012 August 2012 Operational Awareness Oversight of the Nevada National Security Site [HIAR NNSS-2012-08-16] The purpose of this Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) activity was to perform an operational awareness site visit to observe Subcritical Experiment (SCE) activities at the U1a Complex, discuss ongoing activities at the Device Assembly Facility (DAF) and the National Criticality Experiment Research Center (NCERC), and monitor the status of other ongoing site activities at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) operated by National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec). Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - August 2012 More Documents & Publications

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Formalizing information security knowledge  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Unified and formal knowledge models of the information security domain are fundamental requirements for supporting and enhancing existing risk management approaches. This paper describes a security ontology which provides an ontological structure for ... Keywords: information security, risk management, security ontology

Stefan Fenz; Andreas Ekelhart

2009-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

342

Physical Security Systems | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Physical Security Systems | National Nuclear Security Administration Physical Security Systems | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Physical Security Systems Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nuclear Security > Physical Security Systems Physical Security Systems After the 9/11 terrorist attacks, NNSA took steps to protect its critical

343

Security Forms | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Management & Safeguards System Security Forms Federal Information Processing Standards Publications (FIPS PUBS) FIPS-Associated Documents FIPS 140-2 Security Requirements...

344

Physical Security Systems | National Nuclear Security Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Physical Security Systems | National Nuclear Security Administration Physical Security Systems | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Physical Security Systems Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nuclear Security > Physical Security Systems Physical Security Systems After the 9/11 terrorist attacks, NNSA took steps to protect its critical

345

Information Security: Coordination of Federal Cyber Security...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

a federal agenda for cyber security research. GAO also recommends that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issue guidance to agencies for providing cyber security research...

346

Security Forms | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Security Forms Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nuclear Security > Nuclear Materials...

347

DECISION AND ORDER  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

, 2004 , 2004 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Decision of the Director Name of Petitioner: Charles L. Evans Date of Filing: May 17, 2004 Case Number: TBU-0026 Charles Evans, a former employee of Fluor Hanford Inc. (Fluor), a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor, appeals the DOE Richland Operations Office=s (Richland) dismissal of the whistleblower complaint he filed against Fluor under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program. I. BACKGROUND A. The DOE=s Contractor Employee Protection Program The DOE=s Contractor Employee Protection Program was established to safeguard Apublic and employee health and safety; ensur[e] compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations; and prevent[] fraud, mismanagement, waste and abuse@ at DOE=s government-owned, contractor-operated facilities. 57 Fed. Reg.

348

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 12, 2012 March 12, 2012 PSH-11-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On March 12, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she determined that an Individual=s access authorization should not be granted. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not resolved the security concerns arising from his illegal drug use, alcohol use, and misrepresentations made during the process regarding his eligibility for access authorization. At the hearing, the Individual did not present any evidence to rebut any of the allegations. March 5, 2012 PSH-11-0010 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a DOE contractor and has held a DOE access authorization for several years. DOE Exhibit (Ex.) 13 at 2. In June 2011,

349

Office of Security and Emergency Management  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Office of Security and Emergency Management Office of Security and Emergency Management The Security and Emergency Management page is designed to give newcomers and veterans alike an introduction and refresher about our activities. We hope you will find it useful. Much of this page's contents are oriented to reindustrialization and other managers of new DOE projects and programs. Feel free to contact the designated key personnel for assistance. Access Authorization Branch Using established guidelines and the "whole person concept," we evaluate and adjudicate informaton about those who need clearances which is developed during background investigations. The objective is to render access determinations that are in the best interest of national security. We also provide security education and awareness information, personnel security program support, and visitor control and foreign travel support to the Oak Ridge Office, the Paducah-Portsmouth Project Office, and the Thomas Jefferson National Accerelator Facility.

350

Cyber Security Evaluations Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Oversight Home Sub Offices Security Evaluations Cyber Security Evaluations Emergency Management Oversight Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Mission &...

351

Global Security 2009  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Security *Intelligence *Hyper Innovation Global Security Weapons & Complex Integration NIF Office of Strategic Outcomes Operations & Business Lawrence Livermore National...

352

Safety and Security  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

*. Bookmark and Share. Safety and Security. ... National and International Standards for X-ray Security Screening Applications. ...

2013-07-29T23:59:59.000Z

353

Cryptographic and Security Testing  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Directory of Accredited Laboratories. Cryptographic and Security Testing. ... TX. atsec information security corporation, Austin, TX [200658- 0] VA. ...

2013-12-27T23:59:59.000Z

354

Computer Security Division Homepage  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Computer Security Division. ... The 2012 Computer Security Division Annual Report (Special Publication 800-165) is now available. ...

2013-09-12T23:59:59.000Z

355

Mobile Security and Forensics  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Mobile Security and Forensics. Summary: The goal of the project is to improve the security of mobile devices and software. ...

2013-01-15T23:59:59.000Z

356

ARM - Facility News Article  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

December 15, 2007 [Facility News] December 15, 2007 [Facility News] Radar Antenna Replacement Effort Begins at Barrow Bookmark and Share On November 28, 2007, ARM operations and engineering staff braved -15°F weather to install the new radar antenna at Barrow. After lifting the antenna via crane onto the roof of the skydeck, the gloves had to come off to securely fasten all the tiny connecting screws and bolts-brrrrr! On November 28, 2007, ARM operations and engineering staff braved -15°F weather to install the new radar antenna at Barrow. After lifting the antenna via crane onto the roof of the skydeck, the gloves had to come off to securely fasten all the tiny connecting screws and bolts-brrrrr! For estimates of cloud boundaries, there is no better capability than the millimeter wave cloud radar (MMCR). This sophisticated radar is part of the

357

HAN System Security Requirements  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report, "Home Area Network (HAN) Security Requirements," identifies and discusses the key cyber security requirements for different interfaces of HAN-based systems. These cyber security requirements for HAN interfaces are derived from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) "Catalog of Control Systems Security," which provides an excellent checklist of general security requirements.

2009-12-22T23:59:59.000Z

358

Control System Applicable Use Assessment of the Secure Computing Corporation - Secure Firewall (Sidewinder)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Battelles National Security & Defense objective is, applying unmatched expertise and unique facilities to deliver homeland security solutions. From detection and protection against weapons of mass destruction to emergency preparedness/response and protection of critical infrastructure, we are working with industry and government to integrate policy, operational, technological, and logistical parameters that will secure a safe future. In an ongoing effort to meet this mission, engagements with industry that are intended to improve operational and technical attributes of commercial solutions that are related to national security initiatives are necessary. This necessity will ensure that capabilities for protecting critical infrastructure assets are considered by commercial entities in their development, design, and deployment lifecycles thus addressing the alignment of identified deficiencies and improvements needed to support national cyber security initiatives. The Secure Firewall (Sidewinder) appliance by Secure Computing was assessed for applicable use in critical infrastructure control system environments, such as electric power, nuclear and other facilities containing critical systems that require augmented protection from cyber threat. The testing was performed in the Pacific Northwest National Laboratorys (PNNL) Electric Infrastructure Operations Center (EIOC). The Secure Firewall was tested in a network configuration that emulates a typical control center network and then evaluated. A number of observations and recommendations are included in this report relating to features currently included in the Secure Firewall that support critical infrastructure security needs.

Hadley, Mark D.; Clements, Samuel L.

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

359

Security seal  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

Security for a package or verifying seal in plastic material is provided by a print seal with unique thermally produced imprints in the plastic. If tampering is attempted, the material is irreparably damaged and thus detectable. The pattern of the imprints, similar to "fingerprints" are recorded as a positive identification for the seal, and corresponding recordings made to allow comparison. The integrity of the seal is proved by the comparison of imprint identification records made by laser beam projection.

Gobeli, Garth W. (Albuquerque, NM)

1985-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

360

VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel Holsinger, Complainant, v. K-Ray Security, Inc. VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel Holsinger, Complainant, v. K-Ray Security, Inc. This is a request for review by K-Ray Security, Inc., the current security operations contractor at DOE's Federal Energy Technology Center ("FETC"), of the Decision of the Office of Hearings and Appeals ("OHA") on remand from the Deputy Secretary adhering, after an additional evidentiary hearing and an assessment of the equities, to its earlier finding that reinstatement of Complainant Holsinger as a security guard is a necessary and appropriate action to effect full relief, even though it was the prior security contractor, Watkins Security Agency, Inc.,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel Holsinger, Complainant, v. K-Ray Security, Inc. VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel Holsinger, Complainant, v. K-Ray Security, Inc. This is a request for review by K-Ray Security, Inc., the current security operations contractor at DOE's Federal Energy Technology Center ("FETC"), of the Decision of the Office of Hearings and Appeals ("OHA") on remand from the Deputy Secretary adhering, after an additional evidentiary hearing and an assessment of the equities, to its earlier finding that reinstatement of Complainant Holsinger as a security guard is a necessary and appropriate action to effect full relief, even though it was the prior security contractor, Watkins Security Agency, Inc.,

362

FOILFEST :community enabled security.  

SciTech Connect

The Advanced Concepts Group of Sandia National Laboratories hosted a workshop, ''FOILFest: Community Enabled Security'', on July 18-21, 2005, in Albuquerque, NM. This was a far-reaching look into the future of physical protection consisting of a series of structured brainstorming sessions focused on preventing and foiling attacks on public places and soft targets such as airports, shopping malls, hotels, and public events. These facilities are difficult to protect using traditional security devices since they could easily be pushed out of business through the addition of arduous and expensive security measures. The idea behind this Fest was to explore how the public, which is vital to the function of these institutions, can be leveraged as part of a physical protection system. The workshop considered procedures, space design, and approaches for building community through technology. The workshop explored ways to make the ''good guys'' in public places feel safe and be vigilant while making potential perpetrators of harm feel exposed and convinced that they will not succeed. Participants in the Fest included operators of public places, social scientists, technology experts, representatives of government agencies including DHS and the intelligence community, writers and media experts. Many innovative ideas were explored during the fest with most of the time spent on airports, including consideration of the local airport, the Albuquerque Sunport. Some provocative ideas included: (1) sniffers installed in passage areas like revolving door, escalators, (2) a ''jumbotron'' showing current camera shots in the public space, (3) transparent portal screeners allowing viewing of the screening, (4) a layered open/funnel/open/funnel design where open spaces are used to encourage a sense of ''communitas'' and take advantage of citizen ''sensing'' and funnels are technological tunnels of sensors (the tunnels of truth), (5) curved benches with blast proof walls or backs, (6) making it easy for the public to report, even if not sure/''non-event'' (e.g. ''I'm uncomfortable'') and processing those reports in aggregate not individually, (7) transforming the resident working population into a part-time undercover security/sensor force through more innovative training and (8) adding ambassadors/security that engage in unexpected conversation with the public. The group recommended that we take actions to pursue the following ideas next: (a) A concept for a mobile sensor transport (JMP); (b) Conduct a follow-on workshop; (c) Conduct social experiments/activities to see how people would react to the concepts related to community and security; (d) Explore further aesthetically pleasing, blast-resistance seating areas; and (e) The Art of Freedom (an educational, multi-media campaign).

Moore, Judy Hennessey; Johnson, Curtis Martin; Whitley, John B.; Drayer, Darryl Donald; Cummings, John C., Jr. (.,; .)

2005-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

363

Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - August 2010 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - August Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - August 2010 Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - August 2010 Nevada Critical Experiment Facility Tour and Attendance at the Nuclear Criticality Safety Program The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), participated in the DOE Criticality Safety Support Group's (CSSG) activities in/near Las Vegas, Nevada, including a tour of the Critical Experiment Facility (CEF) located within the Device Assembly Facility (DAF) at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS). These activities support DOE's Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP). Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - August 2010 More Documents & Publications

364

Y-12s Building 9212 and the Uranium Processing Facility, part...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 The Uranium Processing Facility is planned to replace aged facilities at the Y-12 National Security Complex. Support for moving the construction of the facility ahead has caused...

365

Systems security and functional readiness  

SciTech Connect

In Protective Programming Planning, it is important that every facility or installation be configured to support the basic functions and mission of the using organization. This paper addresses the process of identifying the key functional operations of our facilities in Europe and providing the security necessary to keep them operating in natural and man-made threat environments. Functional Readiness is important since many of our existing facilities in Europe were not constructed to meet the demands of today's requirements. There are increased requirements for real-time systems with classified terminals and stringent access control, tempest and other electronic protection devices. One must prioritize the operations of these systems so that essential functions are provided even when the facilities are affected by overt or covert hostile activities.

Bruckner, D.G.

1988-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

366

Record of Decision (ROD) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 18, 2011 August 18, 2011 EIS-0240: Amended Record of Decision Disposition of Surplus Highly Enriched Uranium July 20, 2011 EIS-0387: Record of Decision Y-12 National Security Complex July 8, 2011 EIS-0380: Amended Record of Decision Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico April 18, 2011 EIS-0416: Record of Decision Issuance of Loan Guarantees to Solar Partners I, LLC, Solar Partners II, LLC, and Solar Partners VIII, LLC, for Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System Units 1, 2, 3 March 11, 2011 EIS-0422: Record of Decision Bonneville Power Administration's Central Ferry-Lower Monumental 500-kilovolt Transmission Line Project January 12, 2011 EIS-0407: Record of Decision Abengoa Biorefinery Project Near Hugoton, Stevens County, Kansas November 29, 2010

367

INSTITUTE FOR CYBER SECURITY Security Models  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

INSTITUTE FOR CYBER SECURITY 1 Security Models: Past, Present and Future Prof. Ravi Sandhu Executive Director and Endowed Chair Institute for Cyber Security University of Texas at San Antonio July 2010 ravi.sandhu@utsa.edu www.profsandhu.com © Ravi Sandhu #12;INSTITUTE FOR CYBER SECURITY 2 THE BIG

Sandhu, Ravi

368

Security rules versus Security properties Mathieu Jaume  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Security rules versus Security properties Mathieu Jaume SPI ­ LIP6 ­ University Pierre & Marie components of security policies can be expressed, and we identify their role in the de- scription of a policy, of a system and of a secure system. In this setting, we formally describe two approaches to define policies

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

369

INSTITUTE FOR CYBER SECURITY Security Models  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

INSTITUTE FOR CYBER SECURITY 1 Security Models: Past, Present and Future Prof. Ravi Sandhu Executive Director and Endowed Chair Institute for Cyber Security University of Texas at San Antonio July 2009 ravi.sandhu@utsa.edu www.profsandhu.com © Ravi Sandhu #12;INSTITUTE FOR CYBER SECURITY 2 THE BIG

Sandhu, Ravi

370

Security Procedures Caltech Campus Security Dispatch  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Security Procedures Caltech Campus Security Dispatch: 5000 (from any Caltech phone) or (626) 395-5000 (from any phone) When emergencies arise, contact Caltech Campus Security MEDICAL If someone experiences a medical emergency: · Remain calm · Notify Campus Security Dispatch · Do NOT move victim EARTHQUAKE When

Goddard III, William A.

371

Obfuscation (IND-CPA Security Circular Security)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Obfuscation (IND-CPA Security Circular Security) (Draft Version, 24 October 2013) Antonio@cs.au.dk 2 Aarhus University, Denmark, orlandi@cs.au.dk Abstract Circular security is an important notion for public-key encryption schemes and is needed by several cryptographic protocols. In circular security

International Association for Cryptologic Research (IACR)

372

Summary of Decisions - December 10, 2012 - December 14, 2012 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Summary of Decisions - December 10, 2012 - December 14, 2012 Summary of Decisions - December 10, 2012 - December 14, 2012 Summary of Decisions - December 10, 2012 - December 14, 2012 December 14, 2012 - 2:29pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On December 13, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be granted. A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about the individual's alcohol use. A DOE psychiatrist examined the individual and concluded that the individual suffers from Alcohol Dependence. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to

373

Decisions in the perspective automated artillery fire support  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper is focused on decisions in the future Automated Artillery Fire Support Control System. Artillery units of the Army of the Czech Republic, reflecting current global security neighborhood, can be used outside the Czech Republic. The paper presents ...

M. Blaha; L. Potuk

2011-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

374

Summary of Decisions - August 5, 2013 - August 9, 2013 | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 5, 2013 - August 9, 2013 Summary of Decisions - August 5, 2013 - August 9, 2013 August 9, 2013 - 8:32am Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On August 9,...

375

Nonproliferation & International Security | National Nuclear Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Nonproliferation & International Security | National Nuclear Security Nonproliferation & International Security | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Nonproliferation & International Security Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nonproliferation > Nonproliferation & International Security Nonproliferation & International Security

376

Nonproliferation & International Security | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Nonproliferation & International Security | National Nuclear Security Nonproliferation & International Security | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Nonproliferation & International Security Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nonproliferation > Nonproliferation & International Security Nonproliferation & International Security

377

Research Facilities  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

FLEX lab image, windows testing lab, scientist inside a lab, Research Facilities EETD maintains advanced research and test facilities for buildings, energy technologies, air...

378

Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - February 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 2011 Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - February 2011 February 2011 Nevada National Security Site Defense Nuclear Facility Safety Board Review [ARPT-NNSS-2011-001] The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), visited the Nevada Site Office (NSO) and the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) from February 14-17, 2011. The purpose of the visit was to observe the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) review and maintain operational awareness of NNSS activities. Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - February 2011 More Documents & Publications Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - July 2011 Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - August 2010

379

Preliminary Notice of Violation, National Security Technologies, LLC -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Security Technologies, National Security Technologies, LLC - NEA-2011-03 Preliminary Notice of Violation, National Security Technologies, LLC - NEA-2011-03 August 11, 2011 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to National Security Technologies, LLC related to Deficiencies in Inspection and Installation of Penetration Fire Seals and Other Components at the Nevada National Security Site The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight has completed its investigation into the facts and circumstances associated with quality assurance (QA) related deficiencies in the inspection and installation of penetration fire seals and other components at the Criticality Experiments Facility (CEF) and the Device Assembly Facility (OAF) at the Nevada National Security Site. The results of

380

Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - July 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - July Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - July 2011 Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - July 2011 July 2011 NNSS Operational Readiness Review of the Joint Actinide Shock Physics Experimental Research Facility [HIAR-NNSS-2011-07-28] At the request of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Service Center, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) site lead for the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) participated in the NNSA Operational Readiness Review (ORR) of the Joint Actinide Shock Physics Experimental Research (JASPER) Facility Restart conducted on July 18-27, 2011. Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - July 2011 More Documents & Publications

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

NIST.gov - Computer Security Division - Computer Security ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... approach to protect critical federal missions and business functions ... security areas such physical security, personnel security, continuity of operations ...

382

PSH-12-0076 - Personnel Security Hearing | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 - Personnel Security Hearing 6 - Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0076 - Personnel Security Hearing On October 26, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be granted . A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about the individual's falsification and financial irresponsibility. His behavior raised security concerns under Criteria F and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, she found that the requisite element of "deliberateness" was met under Criterion F. She further found that

383

Technologies licensed | Y-12 National Security Complex  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Technologies licensed Technologies licensed Technologies licensed Posted: July 16, 2012 - 3:49pm | Y-12 Report | Volume 9, Issue 1 | 2012 Rendering of Y-12's Access Rate Control System Wherever threatening situations arise, in-place security measures make the most of every second. On Feb. 8, a startup firm in Knoxville, Tenn., licensed two security-related technologies from the Y-12 National Security Complex that do just that. The technologies, which delay entrance to controlled-access areas, provide a security solution for various potential markets: commercial nuclear facilities, pharmaceutical manufacturers, correctional facilities and large sporting venues, as well as for other Department of Energy sites. Sustainable Environment Technologies, LLC (SET), licensed the Access Rate

384

Using Operational Security (OPSEC) to Support a Cyber Security...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Using Operational Security (OPSEC) to Support a Cyber Security Culture in Control Systems Environments Using Operational Security (OPSEC) to Support a Cyber Security Culture in...

385

T-592: Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Secure Access Control System...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2: Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Secure Access Control System Unauthorized Password Change Vulnerability T-592: Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Secure Access Control System...

386

TA-55: LANL Plutonium-Processing Facilities  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

TA-55: LANL Plutonium-Processing Facilities TA-55: LANL Plutonium-Processing Facilities TA-55: LANL Plutonium-Processing Facilities TA-55 supports a wide range of national security programs that involve stockpile stewardship, plutonium processing, nuclear materials stabilization, materials disposition, nuclear forensics, nuclear counter-terrorism, and nuclear energy. ...the only fully operational, full capability plutonium facility in the nation. National Security At the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), virtually all plutonium operations occur within the Plutonium Facility at Technical Area 55 (TA-55). TA-55 is the nation's most modern plutonium science and manufacturing facility, and it is the only fully operational, full capability plutonium facility in the nation. Thus, TA-55 supports a wide

387

Cyber and Network Security Homepage  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Cyber and Network Security. Cyber and network security is focused on ensuring three security objectives of information ...

2010-10-05T23:59:59.000Z

388

GAO Information Security Issues Update  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Critical IT Systems & Infrastructure - NNSA Supercomputers CP & Security - State Security System - Wireless Security - IRS e*File ...

2010-10-08T23:59:59.000Z

389

Bioinformatics Systems | National Security | ORNL  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Initiatives Cyber Security Nuclear Forensics Bioinformatics Videos Workshops National Security Home | Science & Discovery | National Security | Initiatives | Bioinformatics SHARE...

390

Security Components and Mechanisms Group  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Security Components and Mechanisms Group. Welcome. ... A security checklist is a document that contains instructions for securely configuring ...

2013-01-17T23:59:59.000Z

391

Security risks evaluation toolbox for smart grid devices  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Numerous smart devices are deployed in smart grid for state measurement, decision-making and remote control. The security issues of smart devices attract more and more attention. In our work, the communication protocol, storage mechanism and authentication ... Keywords: security risk evaluation, smart device, smart grid

Yang Liu, Jiahe Liu, Ting Liu, Xiaohong Guan, Yanan Sun

2013-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

392

Facility Microgrids  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Microgrids are receiving a considerable interest from the power industry, partly because their business and technical structure shows promise as a means of taking full advantage of distributed generation. This report investigates three issues associated with facility microgrids: (1) Multiple-distributed generation facility microgrids' unintentional islanding protection, (2) Facility microgrids' response to bulk grid disturbances, and (3) Facility microgrids' intentional islanding.

Ye, Z.; Walling, R.; Miller, N.; Du, P.; Nelson, K.

2005-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

393

EIS-0228: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8: Record of Decision 8: Record of Decision EIS-0228: Record of Decision Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test Facility The Department of Energy (DOE) is issuing this Record of Decision (ROD) regarding the DOE's proposed Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test (DARHT) facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in northern New Mexico. DOE has decided to complete and operate the DARHT facility at LANL while implementing a program to conduct most tests inside steel containment vessels, with containment to be phased in over ten years. DOE/EIS-0228, Record of Decision Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test Facility, 60 FR 53588 (October 1995) More Documents & Publications EIS-0183: Record of Decision EIS-0380: Mitigation Action Plan Annual Report Audit Report: IG-0699

394

EIS-0228: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

28: Record of Decision 28: Record of Decision EIS-0228: Record of Decision Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test Facility The Department of Energy (DOE) is issuing this Record of Decision (ROD) regarding the DOE's proposed Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test (DARHT) facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in northern New Mexico. DOE has decided to complete and operate the DARHT facility at LANL while implementing a program to conduct most tests inside steel containment vessels, with containment to be phased in over ten years. DOE/EIS-0228, Record of Decision Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test Facility, 60 FR 53588 (October 1995) More Documents & Publications EIS-0183: Record of Decision EIS-0380: Mitigation Action Plan Annual Report Audit Report: IG-0599

395

Interfacial and Nanscale Science Facility  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

INSF Overview INSF Overview Section 2-5-1 Interfacial and Nanoscale Science Facility The Interfacial & Nanoscale Science (I&NS) Facility is a world-class resource for scientific expertise and instrumentation focused on the study of interfacial phenomena and nanoscience and technology. This section summarizes the capabilities available in the I&NS Facility, along with research programs associated with facility users. Activities in the I&NS Facility address national needs in environmental restoration, waste management, pollution prevention, energy, and national security through research that specializes in preparation, characterization, interactions, and reactivity of interfaces and nanoscale materials. The range of scientific expertise and instrumentation within the I&NS Facility provides a unique envi-

396

Information Security | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Information Security | National Nuclear Security Administration Information Security | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Information Security Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nuclear Security > Information Security Information Security Information security deals with requirements for the protection and control of information and matter required to be classified or controlled by

397

Border Security | ornl.gov  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Border Security SHARE Border Security Testing of unmanned aerial surveillance equipment. ORNL performs border security research at the Security Sciences Field Laboratory (SSFL),...

398

Decision Applications: D, Decision Applications: LANL  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Decision Applications Division Systems Engineering and Integration, D-3 Energy and Infrastructure Analysis, D-4 Nuclear Design and Risk Analysis, D-5 Risk Analysis and Decision...

399

Natural Gas Procurement Challenges for a Project Financed Cogeneration Facility  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

A decision to project finance a 110 megawatt combined cycle cogeneration facility in 1986 in place of conventional internal financing greatly changed the way in which natural gas was normally procured by Union Carbide Corporation. Natural gas supply security for the term of financing was a major concern of the financing interest, while competitive fuel cost greatly concerned Union Carbide. In addition, the natural gas contract had to be in place prior to construction financing finalization. This paper will explore the thought process that went into evaluating the various natural gas supply proposals that ultimately resulted in the final contractual arrangements. While the information presented will be deliberately non-specific to the suppliers involved or the contractual terms, the discussion will cover the following areas: PROJECT FINANCING REQUIREMENTS, GAS SUPPLY CONSIDERATIONS, SUPPLY TRANSPORTATION EXPEDITIOUS INTERNAL APPROVAL, and SUPPLIER INTANGIBLES.

Good, R. L.; Calvert, T. B.; Pavlish, B. A.

1988-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

400

Games, Risks, and Analytics: Several Illustrative Cases Involving National Security and Management Situations  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper presents and compares four models of games and risk analyses designed to support strategic and policy decisions, three focusing on national security issues and one on project management. They share a common core of probability, linked decisions ... Keywords: analytics, counterterrorism, failure probability, game analysis, national security, nuclear proliferation, practice, principal--agent model, risk analysis

M. Elisabeth Pat-Cornell

2012-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Security and coordination in a clandestine organization  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

We develop a model of an underground organization. The model is designed to highlight the tradeoff between the operational capacity and operational security of clandestine groups. The underground in this paper is defined by a collection of individual ... Keywords: Decision theory, Networks, Organization theory, Revolutionary organization

G. H. Mccormick; G. Owen

2000-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

402

Microsoft Word - LLNL Security Clearances Final 121108a _2_.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Security Clearances at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratory-California INS-O-09-01 December 2008 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Inspections and Special Inquiries Inspection Report Department of Energy Washington, DC 2 0 5 8 5 December 11, 2008 MEMORAliDUM FOR ADMINISTRATQR, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION CHIEF HEALTH: SAFETY AbD, SECURITY OFFICER FROM: Christopher R. Sharpley . Deputy hlspector General for investigations and h~spections - , . - " SUBJECT: INFORMATION: inspection Report on "Security Clearances at Lawrence Livemore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratory-California" BACKGROUND Department of Energy facilities, including those managed by the National Nuclear Security

403

Cyber Security and Resilient Systems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) Idaho National Laboratory (INL) has become a center of excellence for critical infrastructure protection, particularly in the field of cyber security. It is one of only a few national laboratories that have enhanced the nations cyber security posture by performing industrial control system (ICS) vendor assessments as well as user on-site assessments. Not only are vulnerabilities discovered, but described actions for enhancing security are suggested both on a system-specific basis and from a general perspective of identifying common weaknesses and their corresponding corrective actions. These cyber security programs have performed over 40 assessments to date which have led to more robust, secure, and resilient monitoring and control systems for the US electrical grid, oil and gas, chemical, transportation, and many other sectors. In addition to cyber assessments themselves, the INL has been engaged in outreach to the ICS community through vendor forums, technical conferences, vendor user groups, and other special engagements as requested. Training programs have been created to help educate all levels of management and worker alike with an emphasis towards real everyday cyber hacking methods and techniques including typical exploits that are used. The asset owner or end user has many products available for its use created from these programs. One outstanding product is the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Cyber Security Procurement Language for Control Systems document that provides insight to the user when specifying a new monitoring and control system, particularly concerning security requirements. Employing some of the top cyber researchers in the nation, the INL can leverage this talent towards many applications other than critical infrastructure. Monitoring and control systems are used throughout the world to perform simple tasks such as cooking in a microwave to complex ones such as the monitoring and control of the next generation fighter jets or nuclear material safeguards systems in complex nuclear fuel cycle facilities. It is the intent of this paper to describe the cyber security programs that are currently in place, the experiences and successes achieved in industry including outreach and training, and suggestions about how other sectors and organizations can leverage this national expertise to help their monitoring and control systems become more secure.

Robert S. Anderson

2009-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

404

Summary of the 2013 EPRI/NATF Industry Summit on Physical Security of Transmission Assets  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Compromises to power system physical security can cause long-term outages, which can adversely impact the economy, the environment, public safety, and national security. Such compromises could cost utilities, and ultimately society, billions of dollars. Recent physical security incidents have heightened awareness of the need for greater emphasis on the physical security of substations and transmission facilities. To begin a collaborative process of addressing physical security threats, EPRI and the ...

2013-11-26T23:59:59.000Z

405

Energy, Climate & Infrastructure Security  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Energy, Climate & Infrastructure Security EXCEPTIONAL SERVICE IN THE NATIONAL INTEREST Sandia Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. SAND 2012-1670P Thermal thermal environments different from regulatory standards. Packaging, Transport, Storage & Security

406

Designing security into software  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

When people talk about software security, they usually refer to security applications such as antivirus software, firewalls and intrusion detection systems. There is little emphasis on the security in the software itself. ...

Zhang, Chang Tony

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

407

CAMPUS SECURITY CARD REQUISITION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

CAMPUS SECURITY CARD REQUISITION DEPARTMENT LAST NAME GIVEN NAME(S) SFU ID NUMBER CARD NUMBER CAMPUS SECURITY OFFICE USE ONLY SERVICE CHARGE: ___________________________ DEPOSIT be reported or returned to Campus Security TC 050 (291-5448). CARDHOLDER SIGNATURE DATE: #12;

408

Summary of Decisions - February 4, 2013 - February 8, 2013 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Summary of Decisions - February 4, 2013 - February 8, 2013 Summary of Decisions - February 4, 2013 - February 8, 2013 Summary of Decisions - February 4, 2013 - February 8, 2013 February 8, 2013 - 8:20am Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On February 4, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance after concerns were raised about his possible falsification of information provided on security questionnaires and past drug use. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, with respect to the

409

National Nuclear Security Administration  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Nuclear Security Administration National Nuclear Security Administration Ofice of Secure Transportation mKlK= Box RQMM= ^luquerqueI= kj= UTNUR= ;JAN 03 213 MEMORANDUM FOR GREGORY eK= WOODS GENERAL COUNSEL DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FROM: SUBJECT: JEFFREY P. HARREL ASSIST ANT DEPU FOR SECURE 2013 ANNUAL PLANNING SUMMARY In response to your memorandum of December TI= 2012, the following information is provided for the National Nuclear Security Administration Ofice of Secure

410

Analytical foundations of physical security system assessment  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Physical security systems are intended to prevent or mitigate potentially catastrophic loss of property or life. Decisions regarding the selection of one system or configuration of resources over another may be viewed as design decisions within a risk theoretic setting. The problem of revealing a clear preference among design alternatives, using only a partial or inexact delineation of event probabilities, is examined. In this dissertation, an analytical framework for the assessment of the risk associated with a physical security system is presented. Linear programming is used to determine bounds on the expected utility of an alternative, and conditions for the separation of preferences among alternatives are shown. If distinguishable preferences do not exist, techniques to determine what information may help to separate preferences are presented. The linear programming approach leads to identification of vulnerabilities in a security system through an examination of the solution to the dual problem. Security of a hypothetical military forward operating base is considered as an illustrative example. For two alternative security schemes, the uncertainty inherent in the scenario is represented using probability assessments consisting of bounds on event probabilities and exact probability assignments. Application of the framework reveals no separation of preferences between the alternatives. Examination of the primal and dual solutions to the linear programming problems, however, reveals insights into information which, if obtained, could lead to a separation of preferences as well as information on vulnerabilities in one of the alternative security postures.

Graves, Gregory Howard

2006-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

411

Quantification, Optimization and Uncertainty Modeling in Information Security Risks: A Matrix-Based Approach  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In this paper, the authors present a quantitative model for estimating security risk exposure for a firm. The model includes a formulation for the optimization of controls as well as determining sensitivity of the exposure of assets to different threats. ... Keywords: Cost Benefit Analysis, Data Simulation, Decision Models, IS Risk Management, Investment Justification, Security Management, Security Risk

Sanjay Goel; Eitel J.M. Laura

2010-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

412

NIST, Computer Security Division, Computer Security ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Standards. ITL January 1999, Jan 1999, Secure Web-Based Access to High Performance Computing Resources. ITL November ...

413

NIST, Computer Security Division, Computer Security ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Security Strategies for the Smart Grid: Protecting the ... Overview: The Government Smart Card Interoperability ... Mar 2001, An Introduction to IPsec ...

414

Personnel Security Program | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure...

415

Radiological Security | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure...

416

Cyber Security Evaluations - Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Oversight Program Home Office of Security and Cyber Evaluations Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Guidance Documents Security and Cyber Evaluations ...

417

Security - Problem Solved?  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

There are plenty of security problems that have solutions. Yet, our security problems don't seem to be going away. What's wrong here?

John Viega

2005-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

418

Office of Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Security Security Home Sub Offices › Security Policy › Security Assistance › Departmental Personnel Security Mission & Functions › Security Policy › Security Assistance › Departmental Personnel Security Human Reliability Program (HRP) Guidance Documents Security Technology Information Archive (STIA) Related Links › DOE › DOE CIO › NNSA › DOE CFO › NTC › S&S PIR Contact Us HSS Logo Welcome to the Office of Security Mission and Functions The Office of Security (HS-50) developes security policy, provides security expertise to assist field elements in planning site protection strategies and coordinates with domestic authorities to provide safeguards and security technical assistance, technical systems support, and technology development and deployment opportunities. The Office of Security, through the Office of Departmental Personnel Security, also ensures that Departmental personnel security programs (included the National Nuclear Security Administration) are consistent and effectively implemented.

419

Security: A Coordinated Approach  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... SIM / SEM Asset Management System AAA ICS/SCADA Security Physical Security ... Location-Awareness ICS/SCADA Smart Grid Mobile Devices ...

2012-10-26T23:59:59.000Z

420

JLab Security Banner  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Computer Center | Jefferson Lab Home | Experiments | The Lab | News Privacy and Security Notice Security Notice This is a Federal computer system and is the property of the United...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

NNSA orders security enhancements  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

orders security enhancements NNSA orders security enhancements Because of this government order, until further notice all vehicles entering government property will be required to...

422

NIST Cyber Security Framework  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Page 1. NIST Cyber Security Framework ISA-62443-2-1 :2009 ISA-62443-2-1 (Ed. 2, D2E8 ... Page 2. Security NIST Cyber ...

2013-12-13T23:59:59.000Z

423

Independent Oversight Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex - May 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex - Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex - May 2013 Independent Oversight Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex - May 2013 May 2013 Appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility Safety Basis Preliminary Safety Design Report Process at the Y-12 National Security Complex The Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), conducted an appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility (UPF) Preliminary Safety Design Report (PSDR) and associated site office review processes. This appraisal focused on selected aspects of the PSDR submitted to the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Production Office (NPO) for review

424

Independent Oversight Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex - May 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex - Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex - May 2013 Independent Oversight Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex - May 2013 May 2013 Appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility Safety Basis Preliminary Safety Design Report Process at the Y-12 National Security Complex The Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), conducted an appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility (UPF) Preliminary Safety Design Report (PSDR) and associated site office review processes. This appraisal focused on selected aspects of the PSDR submitted to the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Production Office (NPO) for review

425

A task and technical support sensitive Security Operations Center  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Modern security control and display systems for protected facilities have improved the effectiveness of Security Operations Center (SOC) personnel. The most effective of these utilize sophisticated computerized systems to primarily provide quick and accurate control and display of alarm associated and routine access funcitions. Protected facilities with limited fiscal resources require some type of security control and display system but often cannot justify the cost of equipment and technical support associated with sophisticated systems. This paper describes a disign approach, consisting of four independent building blocks, that provides functionality and complexity commensurate with facility-specific requirements and technical support capabilities. The versatility of the design is demonstrated by showing how the less complex blocks satsify the needs of fiscally limited facilities or the blocks can be intergrated to satisfy the needs of the largest security installations. also, the independent blocks can be intergrated into existing installations to provide needed additional functionality with minimal impact on operations and exisiting equipment. 7 figs.

Newell, R.A.; Sena, P.A.; Salazar, J.S.

1988-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

426

ARM - Facility News Article  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

October 15, 2007 [Facility News] October 15, 2007 [Facility News] ARM Joins National Science Foundation Remote Sensing Collaboration Bookmark and Share In September, the ARM Climate Research Facility became an official member of the National Science Foundation's Center for Collaborative Adaptive Sensing of the Atmosphere, or CASA. Initial discussions for partnering began nearly a year ago. After a series of informative visits and presentations, the decision was made to move forward with membership process. The transfer of interagency funds was completed on September 18, 2007, solidifying the partnership. In the meantime, CASA dedicated a significant effort to support the CLASIC field campaign in June 2007 by providing a network of four scanning X-band radars. CASA is a multi-sector partnership among academia, industry, and government

427

Deputy Secretary Decision Affirming VWA-0018 Decision and Order  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Thomas T. Tiller v. Wackenhut Services, Inc.; Washington, D.C. Case No. VWA-0018 Thomas T. Tiller v. Wackenhut Services, Inc.; Washington, D.C. Case No. VWA-0018 Final Decision and Order Issued by the Deputy Secretary of Energy Issued February 2, 1999 * The original of this document contains information which is subject to withholding from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552. Such material has been deleted from this copy and replaced with XXXXXXX's. This is a request for review by complainant Thomas T. Tiller of an Initial Agency Decision, issued by the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA), denying the two reprisal complaints that he filed pursuant to 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the regulation establishing the DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program. Mr. Tiller was employed by Wackenhut Services, Inc. (Wackenhut), a DOE contractor that provides paramilitary security support services at DOE's Savannah River Site in Aiken, South Carolina.

428

Record of Decision (ROD) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 19, 2008 December 19, 2008 EIS-0236: Record of Decision Complex Transformation --Tritium Research and Development, Flight Test Operations, and Major Environmental Test Facilities December 19, 2008 EIS-0236: Record of Decision Complex Transformation-Operations Involving Plutonium, Uranium, and the Assembly and Disassembly of Nuclear Weapons December 10, 2008 EIS-0283: Amended Record of Decision Surplus Plutonium Disposition: Waste Solidification Building November 17, 2008 EIS-0399: Record of Decision Montana Alberta Tie Ltd. 230-kV Transmission Line Project November 6, 2008 EIS-0312: Record of Decision 2008 Columbia Basin Fish Accords Memorandum of Agreement with the Shoshone-Banock Tribes October 10, 2008 EIS-0369: Record of Decision and Floodplain Statement of Findings

429

Documents: Portsmouth DUF6 Conversion Facility Final EIS and ROD  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Portsmouth DUF6 Final EIS Portsmouth DUF6 Final EIS Search Documents: Search PDF Documents View a list of all documents Portsmouth DUF6 Conversion Facility Final EIS and Record of Decision Full text of the Record of Decision and Final Environmental Impact Statement for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Portsmouth, Ohio, Site. The full text of the Record of Decision and Portsmouth DUF6 Conversion Facility Final EIS and ROD is available for downloading or browsing in Adobe Acrobat PDF format through the links below. Record of Decision PDF Icon Portsmouth DUF6 Conversion Facility: Record of Decision 3.8 MB details PDF Icon Portsmouth DUF6 Conversion Facility: Record of Decision: As Published in the Federal Register 82 KB details

430

Application: Facilities  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Option.. Papavergos, PG; 1991. Halon 1301 Use in Oil and Gas Production Facilities: Alaska's North Slope.. Ulmer, PE; 1991. ...

2011-12-22T23:59:59.000Z

431

Office of Headquarters Personnel Security Operations: Mission and Functions  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Office of Executive Protection Office of Executive Protection Home Sub Offices › HQ Security Officers (HSO) Program › Office of Security Operations › Office of Information Security › Office of Headquarters Personnel › Office of Physical Protection › Office of Security Operations Mission & Functions › Security Operations › HQ Security Operations › HQ Personnel Security Op. › Special Operations HSO Program - 2010 Spotlights - 2009 Spotlights - Spotlights Archives (2008-2007) HSO Contacts Contact Us Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan Security Reference Book HSS Logo Office of Headquarters Personnel Security Operations Reports to the Office of Security Operations Mission and Functions Mission Provide a comprehensive Personnel Security Program for the DOE Headquarters complex. Ensure that DOE classified information, materials, buildings and information systems are safeguarded from compromise by only granting security clearances and building access to trustworthy individuals. This is accomplished through conscientious, just, and thoughtful application of Federal rules and statutes with the goal of ensuring that only individuals whose character, associations, and loyalty do not endanger the common defense are granted access to DOE classified information, materials, buildings and information systems.

432

CYBER SECURITY METRICS AND MEASURES  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... CYBER SECURITY METRICS AND MEASURES ... Keywords: cyber security; metrics; measures; software; computer systems; IT ...

2013-05-07T23:59:59.000Z

433

Nuclear Facility Operations | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Facility Operations Facility Operations Nuclear Facility Operations INL is a science-based, applied engineering national laboratory dedicated to meeting the nation's environmental, energy, nuclear technology, and national security needs. INL is a science-based, applied engineering national laboratory dedicated to meeting the nation's environmental, energy, nuclear technology, and national security needs. The Idaho Operations Office oversees these contract activities in accordance with DOE directives. INL is a multi-program laboratory In addition to enabling the Office of Nuclear Energy to develop space power systems and advanced fuel cycle and reactor technologies, INL facilities are used by the National Nuclear Security Administration and other DOE offices, together with other Federal agencies such as the Department of

434

Secure Manufacturing | Y-12 National Security Complex  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Secure Secure Manufacturing Secure Manufacturing The depth and breadth of Y-12's manufacturing capabilities and expertise enable Y-12 to address current and emerging national security challenges by providing leadership and direction to perform the following activities: solving unique, high-risk manufacturing problems; eliminating the most difficult manufacturability and development obstacles; protecting classified and proprietary materials, components, and information; developing unique technologies to optimize manufacturing and systems performance; and executing projects cost effectively and with timeliness. Y-12 accomplishes this mission to meet the national security challenges of today and those of the future, with capability and expertise in the following areas:

435

PNNL: EDO - Facilities & Equipment  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Facilities & Equipment Facilities & Equipment Facilities Equipment Decades of government investment on and around the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory campus has made PNNL a business-friendly resource for conducting a wide range of research. As a mission-focused organization, we are dedicated to teaming with government agencies, industry and academia to address what we believe are among the nation's most pressing needs in the areas of energy, environment, national security, and fundamental science. But behind these important missions is a wealth of supporting capabilities including incubator space, research laboratories, and user facilities that may be just what your business needs. We invite you to learn more about how we can work with businesses as well as what research laboratories and user facilities are available.

436

Facilities Management | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Operations » Facilities Management Operations » Facilities Management Facilities Management INL is a multiprogram, federally funded research and development center (FFRDC) emphasizing applied engineering to provide solutions for use across the DOE complex, as well as regionally, nationally, and world wide. INL is a multiprogram, federally funded research and development center (FFRDC) emphasizing applied engineering to provide solutions for use across the DOE complex, as well as regionally, nationally, and world wide. Overview The Office of Facilities Management manages programs to maintain and deliver nuclear research facilities and capabilities at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) that are required to help meet the nation's strategic needs in energy and national security. It is part of the Department of

437

Facility Engineering | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Facility Engineering Facility Engineering Facility Engineering Facility Engineering (FE) programmatic element efforts within EM encompasses real property asset management across the EM complex as well as the transfers of real property to Community Reuse Organizations and other entities for asset revitalization and/or economic development. In addition, FE coordinates, analyzes, and concurs on EM site submission for infrastructure reporting, such as, in the Integrated Facilities and Infrastructure crosscut and the Ten-Year Site Plans. Working in close conjunction with other DOE programs and sites EM's FE efforts assist in the development and implementation of policies, strategies, and programs to address asset revitalization at DOE sites to promote DOE's national goals for clean energy and energy security.

438

Industrial Decision Making  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Domestic industrial investment has declined due to unfavorable energy prices, and external markets. Investment behavior has changed over the past few years, and will continue due to high labor costs, tight markets and an unstable U.S. economy although, freight costs, favorable exchange rates and high capacity utilization will encourage future industrial investment. Industry will eventually enter a new period of major investment. Future industrial investment will be an opportunity to influence the energy efficiency of these facilities for generations to come. Program managers must begin engaging industrial customers now, in order to exploit this unprecedented opportunity to change future energy use patterns. This paper reviews recent market trends and industrial investment decision-making. The paper will also address several important questions: Why has industrial investment declined? What is the outlook for industrial investment? How can programs engage industry for future opportunities?

Elliott, R. N.; McKinney, V.; Shipley, A.

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

439

Summary of Decisions - November 12, 2012 - November 16, 2012 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Summary of Decisions - November 12, 2012 - November 16, 2012 Summary of Decisions - November 12, 2012 - November 16, 2012 Summary of Decisions - November 12, 2012 - November 16, 2012 November 16, 2012 - 2:26pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On November 15, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual should be granted authorization access. A Local Security Office denied the individual a security clearance because (1) during the five-year period that the individual attended a university his use of alcohol regularly resulted in his intoxication, including at least 100 instances in which the individual either passed-out or blacked-out and two instances in which law enforcement officers were involved and (2) the individual had been diagnosed with Alcohol-Related

440

Summary of Decisions - November 26, 2012 - November 30, 2012 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

26, 2012 - November 30, 2012 26, 2012 - November 30, 2012 Summary of Decisions - November 26, 2012 - November 30, 2012 November 30, 2012 - 1:32pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On November 26, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance because the individual demonstrated financial irresponsibility through his current delinquent debts and charged off debts, and his inability or unwillingness to live within his means. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, he found that

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Summary of Decisions - October 22, 2012 - October 26, 2012 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, 2012 - October 26, 2012 2, 2012 - October 26, 2012 Summary of Decisions - October 22, 2012 - October 26, 2012 October 26, 2012 - 11:12am Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On October 25, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance because the individual demonstrated financial irresponsibility through, inter alia, (1) delinquent and collection debts totaling approximately $120,000; (2) unpaid state income taxes in the amount of $800; (3) the repossession of his camping trailer for nonpayment; (4) a series of financings secured by his residence between 1990 and 2004, the proceeds of which were primarily used for consumer purchases and the

442

Summary of Decisions - October 22, 2012 - October 26, 2012 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

22, 2012 - October 26, 2012 22, 2012 - October 26, 2012 Summary of Decisions - October 22, 2012 - October 26, 2012 October 26, 2012 - 11:12am Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On October 25, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance because the individual demonstrated financial irresponsibility through, inter alia, (1) delinquent and collection debts totaling approximately $120,000; (2) unpaid state income taxes in the amount of $800; (3) the repossession of his camping trailer for nonpayment; (4) a series of financings secured by his residence between 1990 and 2004, the proceeds of which were primarily used for consumer purchases and the

443

Security tasks are highly interdependent.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Motivation Security tasks are highly interdependent. To improve security tools, we need to understand how security practitioners collaborate in their organizations. Security practitioners in context Exchange of Information Develop security tools that: · Integrate information from different communication

444

Security Policies Dr. Ahmad Almulhem  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Security Policies Dr. Ahmad Almulhem Computer Engineering Department, KFUPM Spring 2008 Ahmad Almulhem - Network Security Engineering - 2008 1 / 51 #12;Security Policies Types of Security Policies Trust Types of Access Control Summary Part I Overview Ahmad Almulhem - Network Security Engineering

Almulhem, Ahmad

445

Nuclear Security | National Nuclear Security Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

| National Nuclear Security Administration | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Nuclear Security Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nuclear Security Nuclear Security The Office of Defense Nuclear Security (DNS) is responsible for the development and implementation of security programs for NNSA. In this capacity, DNS is the NNSA line management organization responsible for

446

Nuclear Security | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

| National Nuclear Security Administration | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Nuclear Security Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nuclear Security Nuclear Security The Office of Defense Nuclear Security (DNS) is responsible for the development and implementation of security programs for NNSA. In this capacity, DNS is the NNSA line management organization responsible for

447

Nuclear Security Enterprise | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Enterprise | National Nuclear Security Administration Enterprise | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Nuclear Security Enterprise Home > About Us > Our Programs > Defense Programs > Nuclear Security Enterprise Nuclear Security Enterprise The Nuclear Security Enterprise (NSE) mission is to ensure the Nation sustains a safe, secure, and effective nuclear deterrent through the

448

Nuclear Security & Safety  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Energy Department is working to enhance nuclear security through defense, nonproliferation, and environmental efforts.

449

Security Technologies Group  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Security Technologies Group. Welcome. Our group develops measurement science in support of performance-based standards ...

2012-10-24T23:59:59.000Z

450

Industrial Control Systems Security  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Risk Management Architecture security focus Physical interaction ... Cybersecurity Cybersecurity Framework Smart Grid Program ...

2013-06-05T23:59:59.000Z

451

Defining and Computing a Value Based Cyber-Security Measure  

SciTech Connect

In past work, we presented a value based measure of cybersecurity that quantifies the security of a system in concrete terms, specifically, in terms of how much each system stakeholder stands to lose (in dollars per hour of operation) as a result of security threats and system vulnerabilities\\; our metric varies according to the stakes that each stakeholder has in meeting each security requirement. In this paper we discuss the specification and design of a system that collects, updates and maintains all the information that pertains to estimating our cybersecurity measure, and offers stakeholders quantitative means to make security-related decisions.

Aissa, Anis Ben [University of Tunis, Belvedere, Tunisia; Abercrombie, Robert K [ORNL; Sheldon, Frederick T [ORNL; Mili, Ali [New Jersey Insitute of Technology

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

452

NERSC Computer Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Security Security NERSC Computer Security NERSC computer security efforts are aimed at protecting NERSC systems and its users' intellectual property from unauthorized access or modification. Among NERSC's security goal are: 1. To protect NERSC systems from unauthorized access. 2. To prevent the interruption of services to its users. 3. To prevent misuse or abuse of NERSC resources. Security Incidents If you think there has been a computer security incident you should contact NERSC Security as soon as possible at security@nersc.gov. You may also call the NERSC consultants (or NERSC Operations during non-business hours) at 1-800-66-NERSC. Please save any evidence of the break-in and include as many details as possible in your communication with us. NERSC Computer Security Tutorial

453

Office of Security Assistance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Security Security Home Sub Offices › Security Policy › Security Assistance › Departmental Personnel Security Mission & Functions › Security Policy › Security Assistance › Departmental Personnel Security Human Reliability Program (HRP) Guidance Documents Security Technology Information Archive (STIA) Related Links › DOE › DOE CIO › NNSA › DOE CFO › NTC › S&S PIR Contact Us HSS Logo Director's Perspective Welcome to the Office of Security Assistance Samuel N. Callahan, Director Mission and Functions The Office of Health, Safety, and Security (HSS) created the Office of Security Assistance Program to provide timely technical assistance and system support to field and Headquarters elements to enhance site security programs, upon request. The program is comprised of technologists and subject matter experts from all security disciplines including Program Management, Protection Program Operations, Information Security, Materials Control and Accountability, and Personnel Security. HSS is committed to building a security assistance program to serve the interests of the Department based upon the needs of our customers - with emphasis on customer-focus and meeting multi-disciplinary security needs. In Fiscal Year 2007, HSS performed extensive assistance activities at the request of DOE/NNSA program offices and field sites. The activities ranged from special and routine site survey assistance, physical and technical security inspections in support of the Office of Intelligence, Vulnerability Assessment and Design Basis Threat (DBT) implementation assistance, third-party, adversary support, and DBT implementation and planning validation activities associated with the Site Assistance Visits and Technology Assistance Visits. The security assistance provided to our customers included technical expertise tailored to augment site capabilities in critical fields.

454

Permitting of Wind Energy Facilities: A Handbook  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This handbook has been written for individuals and groups involved in evaluating wind projects: decision-makers and agency staff at all levels of government, wind developers, interested parties and the public. Its purpose is to help stakeholders make permitting wind facility decisions in a manner which assures necessary environmental protection and responds to public needs.

NWCC Siting Work Group

2002-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

455

Independent Oversight Review, Nevada National Security Site, December 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Security Site, National Security Site, December 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Nevada National Security Site, December 2013 December 2013 Targeted Review of the Safety Significant Blast Door and Special Door Interlock Systems and Review of Federal Assurance Capability at the Nevada National Security Site This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of safety significant Blast Door Interlock and Special Door Interlock systems at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) Device Assembly Facility (DAF). The NNSS DAF is operated by National Security Technologies, LLC under contract to the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Nevada Field Office. The Independent Oversight review was performed on site August 19-27, 2013 by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office

456

Recovery | National Nuclear Security Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Recovery | National Nuclear Security Administration Recovery | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Recovery Home > About Us > Our Programs > Emergency Response > Planning for Emergencies > Recovery Recovery NNSA ensures that capabilities are in place to respond to any NNSA and Department of Energy facility emergency. It is also the nation's premier

457

Preparedness | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Preparedness | National Nuclear Security Administration Preparedness | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Preparedness Home > About Us > Our Programs > Emergency Response > Planning for Emergencies > Preparedness Preparedness NNSA ensures that capabilities are in place to respond to any NNSA and Department of Energy facility emergency. It is also the nation's premier

458

Policy | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Policy | National Nuclear Security Administration Policy | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Policy Home > About Us > Our Programs > Emergency Response > Planning for Emergencies > Policy Policy NNSA ensures that capabilities are in place to respond to any NNSA and Department of Energy facility emergency. It is also the nation's premier

459

National Nuclear Security Administration IUA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

IUA IUA '1.L'\I~~ Pantex Site Office IIV1'~~4j P. O. Box 30030 Amarillo, TX 79120 National Nuclear Security Administration NEPA Compliance Officer Rationale Pantex Site Office Proj. No.: EXP-IO-OlS-C NEPA ID No.: PXP-IO-OOOI Uninterruptable Power Supply (UPS)/Generator Replacement Application of DOE NEPA Procedure: Categorical Exclusions B 1.3 and B 1.23, Applicable to Facility Operations (10 CFR Part 1021 , Subpart D, Appendix B), apply to the proposed activity described below. Rationale: The U.S . Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), proposes to demolish Building 12-20, which is 225 square feet (sf) in size, along with a small concrete pad of approximately 32 sf. The building currently houses an inoperable

460

Decision Superiority Process Model  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Decision superiority is achieved not just by acquiring and assessing the right information, but by translating it into actionable knowledge that can be exploited in the decision making process. Achieving decision superiority is necessary, because the ... Keywords: context-goal alternatives, decision making process, decision superiority, process model

Barbara Sorensen; Azad M. Madni; Carla C. Madni

2008-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

MasteringWeb Services Security MasteringWeb Services Security  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Preview of MasteringWeb Services Security Preview of MasteringWeb Services Security Konstantin introduction Highlights of the book Web Services security problem XML Security WS-Security Security mechanisms for ASP.NET Web Services Planning and building secure Web Service systems ­ Architectural and policy

462

The IAEA Assistance and Training Programme for Transport Security  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The IAEA Office of Nuclear Security is working cooperatively with the U.S. Department of Energy's Global Threat Reduction Initiative, European Union and Australia to provide transport security assistance to countries throughout the world. Assistance is available to countries in reviewing and upgrading their transport security programs at all levels: (1) National level (regulatory and other government agencies); and (2) Operator level (shippers and carriers). Assistance is directed at implementing a consistent level of security throughout the life cycle of radioactive material (same level of security during transport as when in a fixed facility) Upgrade assistance can include: (1) Expert advisory missions to provide advice and guidance; (2) Training courses for regulatory, governmental and industry personnel; (3) Transport security awareness; (4) Detailed training on designing and implementing transport security programs; (5) Planning to identify and prioritize needs (developing security approaches and plans); (6) Developing model security plans and procedures; and (7) Equipment (vehicles, packages, command and control equipment, etc.). Country visits are now being scheduled to initiate transport security cooperative activities. A training course has been developed to assist countries in developing and implementing transport security programs. The training course has been given as a national training course (three times) and as a Regional training course (three times). The course addresses recommended security provisions for the transport of all radioactive material.

Hawk, Mark B [ORNL; Eriksson, Ann-Margret [International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); Rawl, Richard [Transport Security and Safety, Oak Ridge; Anderson, Kimberly K [ORNL

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

463

Safety and Security Enforcement Process Overview  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SAFETY AND SECURITY SAFETY AND SECURITY ENFORCEMENT PROCESS OVERVIEW August 2012 OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND OVERSIGHT OFFICE OF HEALTH, SAFETY AND SECURITY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AUGUST 2012 DOE ENFORCEMENT PROCESS OVERVIEW PREFACE i Preface Over the years, the United States Congress has given the Secretary of Energy authority to promulgate rules to provide assurance that U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) contractors provide a workplace free from recognized hazards, that the operations of our nuclear facilities minimize potential danger to life and property, and that our classified matter is protected from disclosure in the interest of national security. Congress institutionalized these mandates through amendments to the Atomic Energy Act, and Congress also provided DOE with enforcement authority to assure compliance

464

Welcome to Los Alamos National Laboratory: A premier national security science laboratory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Dr Wallace presents visitors with an overview of LANL's national security science mission: stockpile stewardship, protecting against the nuclear threat, and energy security & emerging threats, which are underpinned by excellence in science/technology/engineering capabilities. He shows visitors a general Lab overview of budget, staff, and facilities before providing a more in-depth look at recent Global Security accomplishments and current programs.

Wallace, Terry [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2012-06-25T23:59:59.000Z

465

Global Security | Y-12 National Security Complex  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Security Security Global Security We train nuclear industry professionals, emergency responders and security forces from around the world to safeguard vulnerable materials. Nuclear nonproliferation - stopping the spread of nuclear materials - is a critical part of creating a safer world. Y-12 has been working in nonproliferation since the early 1990s in more than 25 countries. As the nation reduces the size of its arsenal, Y-12 will play a central role in decommissioning weapons systems and providing weapons material for peacetime uses. We are a leader across the National Nuclear Security Administration in implementing technology and current training to ensure materials are protected with the highest degree of confidence. We provide the expertise to secure highly enriched uranium - domestically

466

Security Notice | Y-12 National Security Complex  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Security Notice Security Notice Security Notice Security Information This website is part of a federal computer system used to accomplish federal functions. Y-12 uses software programs to monitor this website for security purposes to ensure it remains available to all users and to protect information in the system. By accessing this website, you are expressly consenting to these monitoring activities. Unauthorized attempts to defeat or circumvent security features; to use the system for other than intended purposes; to deny service to authorized users; to access, obtain, alter, damage, or destroy information; or otherwise to interfere with the system or its operation - all are prohibited. Evidence of such acts may be disclosed to law enforcement authorities and result in criminal prosecution under the Computer Fraud and

467

Development of a security-by-design handbook.  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

There is an increasing awareness that efficient and effective nuclear facility design is best achieved when requirements from the 3S disciplines Safety, Safeguards, and Security - are balanced and intrinsic to the facility design. This can be achieved when policy, processes, methods, and technologies are understood and applied in these areas during all phases of the design process. For the purposes of this paper, Security-by-design will be defined as the system level incorporation of the physical protection system (PPS) into a new or retrofitted nuclear power plant (NPP) or nuclear facility (NF) resulting in intrinsic security. Security-by-design can also be viewed as a framework to achieve robust and durable security systems. This paper reports on work performed to date to create a Security-by-Design Handbook, under a bilateral agreement between the United States and Japan, specifically, a review of physical protection principles and best practices, and a decommissioning to better understand where these principles and practices can be applied. This paper describes physical protection principles and best practices to achieve security-by- design that were gathered from International, Japanese, and U.S. sources. Principles are included for achieving security early in the design process where security requirements are typically less costly and easier to incorporate. The paper then describes a generic design process that covers the entire facility lifecycle from scoping and planning of the project to decommissioning and decontamination. Early design process phases, such as conceptual design, offer opportunities to add security features intrinsic to the facility design itself. Later phases, including design engineering and construction, are important for properly integrating security features into a coherent design and for planning for and assuring the proper performance of the security system during the operation and decommissioning of the facility. The paper also describes some future activities on this bilateral project to create a Security-by-Design Handbook. When completed, the Handbook is intended to assist countries with less experience in nuclear power programs to apply principles and best practices in an effective and efficient manner as early in the design as possible to achieve robust and durable security.

Olson, David L.; Snell, Mark Kamerer; Iida, Toru (Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai-mura, Ibaraki, Japan); Ochiai, Kazuya (Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai-mura, Ibaraki, Japan); Tanuma, Koji (Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai-mura, Ibaraki, Japan)

2010-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

468

Department of Energy award DE-SC0004164 Climate and National Security: Securing Better Forecasts  

SciTech Connect

The Climate and National Security: Securing Better Forecasts symposium was attended by senior policy makers and distinguished scientists. The juxtaposition of these communities was creative and fruitful. They acknowledged they were speaking past each other. Scientists were urged to tell policy makers about even improbable outcomes while articulating clearly the uncertainties around the outcomes. As one policy maker put it, we are accustomed to making these types of decisions. These points were captured clearly in an article that appeared on the New York Times website and can be found with other conference materials most easily on our website, www.scripps.ucsd.edu/cens/. The symposium, generously supported by the NOAA/JIMO, benefitted the public by promoting scientifically informed decision making and by the transmission of objective information regarding climate change and national security.

Reno Harnish

2011-08-16T23:59:59.000Z

469

LANL's sanitary facility can now recycle up to 300,000 gallons...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

sanitary facility can now recycle up to 300,000 gallons of water daily | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation...

470

User Facilities  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory's National User Facilities are available for cooperative research with institutions and the private sector worldwide. The Environmental...

471

Facility Representative of the Year Award  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE YEAR AWARD PROGRAM REPRESENTATIVE OF THE YEAR AWARD PROGRAM OBJECTIVE The Facility Representative Award Program is a special award designed to recognize superior or exemplary service by a Facility Representative over a period of one year. This special award program has been established in accordance with the requirements of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 331.1C, Employee Performance Management and Recognition Program. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE OF THE YEAR AWARD The Facility Representative of the Year Award is determined by a panel representing the Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer and managers from the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), the Office of Environmental Management (EM), the Office of Science (SC), and the Office of Nuclear Energy (NE). The Facility Representative Program Manager in

472

NIST, Computer Security Division, Computer Security ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... The NIST Handbook SP 800-12. SP 800-12 (HTML). NIST IR 7621, Oct 2009, Small Business Information Security: The Fundamentals NISTIR 7621. ...

473

Office of Headquarters Security Operations: Security Awareness...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Paul Ruehs Contact Information: Paul Ruehs - (301) 903-7189; Room F-324 Scope: The Security Awareness Program is established by DOE Order to inform individuals of their...

474

Using MotorMaster to Track Motor Inventory and Analyze Purchasing Decisions  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

MotorMaster 4.0 can be a useful software package for electric motor management decisions in industrial facilities. To be successful, the MotorMaster database must be populated with detailed motor nameplate information. Georgia Tech worked with a large, motor intensive chemical manufacturing plant to collect motor nameplate information on motors 60 hp or larger and populate the motor database. Approximately 130 motors were identified and surveyed. The completed motor database is used to track maintenance actions and to analyze motor replacement options. The approach used to secure and enter motor nameplate data along with examples of purchasing analyses completed will be presented. The success of the MotorMaster software with large motors has convinced the firm to expand its use to smaller horsepower motors.

Brown, M.; Meffort, W.

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

475

VWA-0005 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel L. Holsinger  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel L. Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel L. Holsinger VWA-0005 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel L. Holsinger This is a request for review by K-Ray Security, Inc., from the Initial Agency Decision by the Office of Hearings and Appeals ("OHA"), finding that reinstatement of Mr. Holsinger as a security guard is a necessary and appropriate action to effect full relief for a retaliatory termination made by the previous security contractor, Watkins Security Agency, Inc., ("WSA"). Based upon my review of the regulatory language, the relevant case law, and the entire record, I conclude that OHA's decision is incorrect. Mr. Holsinger filed a complaint with the Office of Contractor Employee Protection ("OCEP") on October 7, 1994. R. 103-106. He alleged that he had

476

Documents: Paducah DUF6 Conversion Facility Final EIS and ROD  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Paducah DUF6 Final EIS Paducah DUF6 Final EIS Search Documents: Search PDF Documents View a list of all documents Paducah DUF6 Conversion Facility Final EIS and Record of Decision Full text of the Record of Decision and Final Environmental Impact Statement for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Paducah, Kentucky, Site. The full text of the Record of Decision and Paducah DUF6 Conversion Facility Final EIS and ROD is available for downloading or browsing in Adobe Acrobat PDF format through the links below. You may also order a CD-ROM or paper copy of the Depleted UF6 Conversion Facility EISs by submitting a Final EIS Document Request Form. Record of Decision PDF Icon Paducah DUF6 Conversion Facility: Record of Decision 3.6 MB details

477

Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - April 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April April 2011 Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - April 2011 April 2011 Nevada National Security Site Operational Readiness Review for the Joint Actinide Shock Physics Experimental Research Facility Restart Pre-visit [HIAR-NNSS-2011-04-28] In coordination with the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Service Center, the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) site lead participated in a pre-visit for the NNSA Operational Readiness Review (ORR) of the Joint Actinide Shock Physics Experimental Research (JASPER) facility restart conducted April 25-28, 2011. The results of the pre-visit were the completion of required site access training, coordination with Site Office and JASPER facility counterparts regarding the breadth and scope of the ORR and obtaining applicable

478

Integrated safeguards & security for material protection, accounting, and control.  

SciTech Connect

Traditional safeguards and security design for fuel cycle facilities is done separately and after the facility design is near completion. This can result in higher costs due to retrofits and redundant use of data. Future facilities will incorporate safeguards and security early in the design process and integrate the systems to make better use of plant data and strengthen both systems. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the integration of materials control and accounting (MC&A) measurements with physical security design for a nuclear reprocessing plant. Locations throughout the plant where data overlap occurs or where MC&A data could be a benefit were identified. This mapping is presented along with the methodology for including the additional data in existing probabilistic assessments to evaluate safeguards and security systems designs.

Duran, Felicia Angelica; Cipiti, Benjamin B.

2009-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

479

National Nuclear Security Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

i. i. Message from the Administrator President Obama has reshaped our national security priorities making enterprise infrastructure modernization with integrated Information Technology (IT) capabilities a key strategic initiative. Our IT infrastructure must ensure that our workforce can access appropriate information in a secure, reliable, and cost-effective manner. Effective information sharing throughout the government enhances the national security of the United States (US). For the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), effective information sharing helps strengthen our nuclear security mission; builds collaborative networks within NNSA as well as with the Department of Energy (DOE), Department of Defense (DoD), and other national security

480

Homeland Security Programs | ORNL  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Homeland Security Programs Homeland Security Programs SHARE Homeland Security Programs The Homeland Security Programs support the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), other federal and state agencies, and commercial partners. Through the integration of a number of key competencies, ORNL is able to provide critical operational, technical, and scientific support to these sponsors. A key focus of this area is to translate the critical research into operational capability for the security, protection, response, and recovery of the nation against natural and man-made events. Research Areas detecting, preventing, and reversing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction deploying integrated systems for incident awareness, detection, and response providing technology for detecting explosives at the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

NNSA PERSONNEL SECURITY CLEARANCE ACTION REQUEST Required: SUBJECT INFORMATION  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PERSONNEL SECURITY PERSONNEL SECURITY CLEARANCE ACTION REQUEST Required: SUBJECT INFORMATION Contractor Federal Name (Last, First, Middle): Suffix: Date of Birth: Social Security Number: Place of Birth (city and state/country): Citizenship(s): Email Address: Employer (legal name): Job Title: Required: LOCATION/BILLING Work Location: Contracting Office Location/SON: Prime Contract Number: Sub-contract Number: Facility Code: Employer Code: Required: CLEARANCE ACTION Requested Action(s): Clearance Level: (for employer/contract above) Clearance History Never held a clearance Previously held Currently holds Key Management Personnel (KMP)? Human Reliability Program (HRP)? PERSONNEL SECURITY USE ONLY: DOE Clearance: Special Access Program (SAP)? Yes No CLEARANCE JUSTIFICATION NARRATIVE

482

Independent Oversight Assessment, Y-12 National Security Complex - June  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Y-12 National Security Complex - Y-12 National Security Complex - June 2012 Independent Oversight Assessment, Y-12 National Security Complex - June 2012 June 2012 Assessment of Nuclear Safety Culture at the Y-12 National Security Complex Uranium Processing Facility Project The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent assessment of nuclear safety culture at the DOE Uranium Processing Facility Project (UPF). The primary objective of the evaluation was to provide information regarding the status of the safety culture at UPF project. The data collection phase of the assessment occurred from late February through March 2012. The safety culture evaluation performed by the external independent safety