Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan- Chapter 14, Cyber Security  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 14, Cyber Security Describes the DOE Headquarters Cyber Security Program.

2

Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The purpose of the Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan (HQFMSP) is to inform employees, contractors, and visitors of the security procedures in place at Department of Energy (DOE) Headquarters (HQ) facilities in the Washington, DC area. The HQFMSP does not establish new security requirements; security requirements are established by various Federal laws and regulations, Executive Orders, and DOE directives. This plan explains how these requirements are implemented at HQ and gives HQ personnel and visitors access to the security policies and procedures that affect them regularly. The HQFMSP does not apply to DOE sites or facilities outside the Washington, DC area.

3

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

RESPONSIBILITIES RESPONSIBILITIES FSO Overview FSO Reporting Responsibilities Questions an FSOs at a Non-Possesssing Site Could Be Asked During an Audit Non-Possessing Contractor Security Requirements Plan Training for Facility Security Officers (FSOs) PHY-210DE Facility Security Officer Overview PHY-210DB, Introduction to Facility Security Officer (Self-Study Course ) Duration: 3 days Description: This correspondence course provides an overview of the roles and responsibilities of the DOE or DOE-contractor FSO. The course emphasizes facility clearance requirements, personnel security, information security, incident reporting, and other related programs. The course references the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM) (DoD 5220.22-M) and a comprehensive listing of DOE orders, manuals, guides, forms, and notices.

4

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan- Acronyms  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Acronyms A list of the acronyms contained in the 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan (HQFMSP).

5

Facility Energy Decision System | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Desktop Application Website: www.pnl.govfeds Cost: Paid OpenEI Keyword(s): FEDS, EERE tool, Facility Energy Decision System Language: English References: Facility Energy...

6

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

REPORTING REQUIREMENTS REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Reporting Requirements Matrix Special Message from the Corporate Investigations Office REPORTING PERSONNEL SECURITY CONCERNS If you report an incident of security concern involving yourself or a coworker, you must do so in writing with signature and date. Your report should contain factual and comprehensive information regarding the incident. A good rule of thumb is to ask yourself did I cover the "Who, What, When, Where, and How." If you did, your report will most likely provide all of the necessary information needed by personnel security to render an adjudicative action or decision. FSO Reporting Responsibilities List of company changes that need to be reported by the FSO. SF 2730-NCB, Name Change Request DOE F 5631.29, Security Termination Statement

7

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan- Chapter 1, Physical Security  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 1, Physical Security Describes DOE Headquarters Physical Security procedures related to badges, inspections, access controls, visitor controls, and removal of government property.

8

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 3...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

3, Personnel Security 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 3, Personnel Security June 2014 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 3,...

9

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 14...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4, Cyber Security 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 14, Cyber Security June 2014 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 14, Cyber...

10

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 8...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8, Operations Security Program 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 8, Operations Security Program June 2014 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security...

11

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 10...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0, Security Awareness Program 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 10, Security Awareness Program June 2014 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan...

12

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

FOREIGN OWNERSHIP, CONTROL OR INFLUENCE (FOCI) PROGRAM FOREIGN OWNERSHIP, CONTROL OR INFLUENCE (FOCI) PROGRAM It is DOE policy to obtain information that indicates whether a company that SNL will enter into a contract with is Owned, Controlled, or Influenced by a foreign person or entity and whether as a result, the potential for an undue risk to the common defense and national security may exist. Reference: Department of Energy Order (DOE O) 470.1, Safeguards and Security Program, Change 1, Chapter VI, Section 1 The DOE conducts a background check to determine FOCI, based on the information the company provides through the e-FOCI website: https://foci.td.anl.gov. Upon favorable FOCI certification by DOE, a facility clearance is granted. Facility cleareance is required in order to support personnel clearances needed to perform the work under contractual agreement with Sandia.

13

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

RANDOM DRUG TESTING RANDOM DRUG TESTING The requirement to conduct random drug testing is the result of a memorandum from the previous Secretary of Energy, Samuel Bodman, directing DOE sites to begin random drug testing for all positions that require access authorizations. The decision was based on: A DOE Task Force Review of the Departmental Personnel Security Program completed in February 2007. "A desire to ensure the safety and security of workers, DOE sites, and surrounding communities," Bodman said in the memorandum. Drug Testing Requirements Pre-employment & Clearance Applicants. November 1, 2007, DOE stopped accepting clearance request packages without drug testing results. This includes initial clearances and reinstatements. New Testing Designated Positions (TDP). Any Member of the Workforce who holds an L or Q clearance that will be tested at a 30% random sampling rate.

14

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 11...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

11, Incidents of Security Concern 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 11, Incidents of Security Concern October 2014 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master...

15

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan- Chapter 10, Security Awareness Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 10, Security Awareness Program Describes the DOE Headquarters Security Awareness Program

16

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan- Chapter 8, Operations Security Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 8, Operations Security Program Describes the DOE Headquarters Operations Security (OPSEC) Program.

17

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 2 FSO News For SNL Facility Security Officers FSO Workshop 2012-CANCELLED This year's FSO Workshop has been cancelled due to lack of interest (less than 18% of our FSOs indicated they would attend this year). Instead, we will spend some serious time improving existing tools and developing new tools for you. This includes upgrading the FSO toolcart, developing SNL-specific FSO training, and looking into offering teleconferences or webinars. Here's some of your feedback that we will use for upcoming topics and improvements: Keep up with form revisions on the FSO website. Consider separate training for non-possessing (construction) versus possessing sites. Provide training on: Changes to DOE directives and upcoming changes to the complex. Where to report different things.

18

Perimeter security for Minnesota correctional facilities  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

For the past few years, the Minnesota Department of Corrections, assisted by Sandia National Laboratories, has developed a set of standards for perimeter security at medium, close, and maximum custody correctional facilities in the state. During this process, the threat to perimeter security was examined and concepts about correctional perimeter security were developed. This presentation and paper will review the outcomes of this effort, some of the lessons learned, and the concepts developed during this process and in the course of working with architects, engineers and construction firms as the state upgraded perimeter security at some facilities and planned new construction at other facilities.

Crist, D. [Minnesota Department of Corrections, St. Paul, MN (United States); Spencer, D.D. [Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States)

1996-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

19

Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Chapter 10-1 Chapter 10 Security Awareness Program This chapter describes the DOE HQ Security Awareness Program. It implements the requirements of: Title 32, CFR, Part 2001,...

20

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

SNL SECURITY CONTACTS SNLNM Contacts SNLCA Contacts Function Contact Email Telephone Badge Office 505-284-3626 - Escorting security@sandia.gov 505-845-1321 Classification...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Infrastructure and Facilities Management | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Infrastructure and Facilities Management | National Nuclear Security Infrastructure and Facilities Management | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Infrastructure and Facilities Management Home > content > Infrastructure and Facilities Management Infrastructure and Facilities Management NNSA restores, rebuilds, and revitalizes the physical infrastructure of the

22

Contained Firing Facility | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Contained Firing Facility | National Nuclear Security Administration Contained Firing Facility | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Contained Firing Facility Home > About Us > Our Programs > Defense Programs > Office of Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation > Office of Research and Development > Facilities > Contained Firing Facility

23

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

BASE REGULATIONS BASE REGULATIONS ***Announcement*** Starting April 4, 2011, SNL will no longer use the EAL. All incoming visits (US Citizens) to SNL facilities on KAFB must be submitted using either the unclassified visit or classified visit process Entering the Base Visitors with a standard DOE badge or a valid visitor badge issued from Sandia/New Mexico may present it to the guard at any KAFB gate and be granted entry. Visitors who obtain a visitor badge from the Sandia Badge Office use this to gain entry to the base. Vehicle passes for visitors are no longer required. The guard may verify the following information from visitors: Current registration Proof of insurance Driver's license Rental agreement (if applicable) Remember that your host has primary responsibility for ensuring that the details of your visit, including base entry, are properly coordinated beforehand with Sandia Security and with KAFB. Prospective visitors or Sandia hosts who have questions about the process may contact the Badge Office at (505) 284-3626.

24

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 7...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

7, Surveys and Reviews 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 7, Surveys and Reviews June 2014 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 7,...

25

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Table of...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Table of Contents 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Table of Contents June 2014 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Table of Contents The Table of...

26

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 15...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

5, Outprocessing 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 15, Outprocessing June 2014 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 15,...

27

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 16...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6, Equivalencies and Exemptions 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 16, Equivalencies and Exemptions June 2014 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security...

28

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 6...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

6, Foreign Interaction 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 6, Foreign Interaction June 2014 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 6,...

29

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 12...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2, Special Access Programs 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 12, Special Access Programs June 2014 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan -...

30

High Explosives Application Facility | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Explosives Application Facility | National Nuclear Security Explosives Application Facility | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog The National Nuclear Security Administration High Explosives Application Facility Home > About Us > Our Programs > Defense Programs > Office of Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation > Office of Research and Development >

31

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 17...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

7, Headquarters Security Officer Program 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 17, Headquarters Security Officer Program June 2014 2014 Headquarters...

32

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

U.S. DOE SECURITY CLEARANCES U.S. DOE SECURITY CLEARANCES Clearnce Home Initial Clearance Clearance Reinstate Clearance Upgrade Clearance Downgrade Clearance Extension Clearance Reciprocity Clearance Reinvestigation Clearance Termination Clearance Transfer Sandia National Laboratories sponsors and processes U.S. DOE Security Clearances for contractor personnel working on an authorized contract requiring access to classified information. Clearance Office Functions Contractor Pre-Process Background Review Certification Clearance File Change Drug Testing e-Fingerprinting Enrollment Process Maintaining a DOE Security Clearance During an Extended Absence DOE Personnel Security Reporting Requirements Data Report on Spouse/Cohabitant Name Change Change in Citizenship Contractor Clearance Tools Clearance Action Status Inquiries

33

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

OPSEC OPSEC What is OPSEC? Millitary term for Operations Security Five-step process / Simplified Two-step Supplements formal security disciplines Industry wide (private and govt.) Goals of OPSEC To raise security awareness Make intelligence or information gathering difficult To attempt to stop adversaries from obtaining classified or sensitive information Basic OPSEC Practices Properly handle and destroy classified and sensitive unclassified information Phones, Cell phones, faxes, and radios are subject to interception Be security minded when doing these activities Use the most secure means of communicating Guard against unsolicited inquiries to obtain sensitive information (by person, phone, email, or social sites) Ensure sensitive information is not put in recycling or trash

34

Facilities | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Inertial Confinement Fusion Inertial Confinement Fusion Facilities Home > About Us > Our Programs > Defense Programs > Office of Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation > Office of Inertial Confinement Fusion > Facilities Facilities Office of Inertial Confinement Fusion, Facilities ICF operates a set of world-class experimental facilities to create HEDP conditions and to obtain quantitative data in support of its numerous stockpile stewardship-related activities. To learn about three high energy experimental facilities and two small lasers that provide ICF capabilities, select the links below. National Ignition Facility, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory OMEGA and OMEGA EP, University of Rochester Laboratory for Laser Energetics Z Machine, Sandia National Laboratories

35

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

require authoization be obtained throught the SNL Foreign National Request (FNR) Security Plan (SP) electronic process. The Contractor and Subcontractor must notify their...

36

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

the potential danger associated with an item is questionable, consult the physical security contact for additional information. Illegal drugs (does not include controlled...

37

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 4...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

4, FOCI, Facility Clearances, and Classified Contract Registration 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 4, FOCI, Facility Clearances, and Classified Contract...

38

Physical security of cut-and-cover underground facilities  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

To aid designers, generic physical security objectives and design concepts for cut-and-cover underground facilities are presented. Specific aspects addressing overburdens, entryways, security doors, facility services, emergency egress, security response force, and human elements are discussed.

Morse, W.D.

1998-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

39

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan- Chapter 11, Incidents of Security Concern  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 11, Incidents of Security Concern Describes DOE Headquarters procedures for reporting, investigating, and correcting Incidents of Security Concern.

40

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 2011 FSO Conference August 11, 2011 Click here to view the agenda. The Safeguards and Security Communications Team would like to thank everyone who attended this year's FSO...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Facilities | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Office of Defense Science Office of Defense Science Facilities Home > About Us > Our Programs > Defense Programs > Office of Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation > Office of Research and Development > Facilities Facilities Office of Research and Development, Facilities The Office of Research and Development manages and oversees the operation of an exceptional suite of science, technology, and engineering facilities that support and further the national stockpile stewardship agenda. Of varying size, scope and capabilities, the facilities work in a concert to accomplish the following activities: Annual assessment of the stockpile in the face of increasing challenges due to aging or remanufacture, Reduced response times for resolving stockpile issues, Timely and certifiable completion of Life Extension Programs,

42

Facilities | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Research and Development manages and oversees the operation of an exceptional suite of science, technology and engineering facilities that support and further the national...

43

Public Reading Facilities | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Reading Facilities | National Nuclear Security Administration Reading Facilities | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Public Reading Facilities Home > About Us > Our Operations > NNSA Office of General Counsel > Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) > Public Reading Facilities Public Reading Facilities The FOIA and E-FOIA require that specific types of records as well as

44

Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers SEPTEMBER 2010 Solar Energy: www.ntis.gov/help/ordermethods.aspx PROCURING SOLAR ENERGY: A GUIDE FOR FEDERAL FACILITY DECISION MAKERS #12;September 2010 3 Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers Blaise

45

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

OVERVIEW OVERVIEW SPECIAL MESSAGE Please refer to this website each time you need to generate a required form. This will ensure that you are using the most recent version of the form. Do not download the form and save on place it on your hard drive. Proper Completion of Security Termination Statements: When completing Security Termination Statements for submittal to DOE, please ensure the reason for termination is clear and provides the reason(s) for termination. This will allow DOE to make any necessary determinations that may affect clearance eligibility. For example, simply including "terminated" or "for cause" does not provide enough information to DOE for processing. Please direct questions to Joanne Trujillo at 284-2554 or jmtruji@sandia.gov in NM and Carol James 294-2061or cdjames@sandia.gov in CA.

46

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan- Chapter 15, Outprocessing  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 15, Outprocessing Describes DOE Headquarters procedures for completing required security actions by departing employees and contractors.

47

Facility will focus on bioenergy, global food security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Facility will focus on bioenergy, global food security Facility will focus on bioenergy, global food security The New Mexico Consortium expects to complete the 27,000 square foot...

48

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 9...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

9, Technical Surveillance Countermeasures 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 9, Technical Surveillance Countermeasures June 2014 2014 Headquarters...

49

Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements October 8, 2013 - 2:02pm Addthis Section 432 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 requires agencies to report Federal facility energy and water use. Section 432 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 requires agencies to report Federal facility energy and water use. The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) is responsible for tracking Federal agency progress toward meeting Section 432 of the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007 for Federal facility energy and water management and benchmarking. The EISA 432 Compliance Tracking System (EISA 432 CTS) tracks agency

50

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan- Chapter 4, FOCI, Facility Clearances, and Classified Contract Registration  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 4, FOCI, Facility Clearances, and Classified Contract Registration Describes DOE Headquarters procedures for contractors making FOCI submissions, obtaining facility clearances, and registering classified contracts.

51

Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Facility Reporting » Energy Independence and Facility Reporting » Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements October 8, 2013 - 2:02pm Addthis Section 432 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 requires agencies to report Federal facility energy and water use. Section 432 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 requires agencies to report Federal facility energy and water use. The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) is responsible for tracking Federal agency progress toward meeting Section 432 of the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007 for Federal facility energy and water management and benchmarking.

52

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 5...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

5, Classified Matter Protection and Control 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 5, Classified Matter Protection and Control June 2014 2014 Headquarters...

53

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 2...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

2, Limited Areas, Vault-Type Rooms and Temporary Limited Areas 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 2, Limited Areas, Vault-Type Rooms and Temporary Limited...

54

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan- Chapter 6, Foreign Interaction  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 6, Foreign Interaction Describes DOE Headquarters procedures for approving foreign national visitors and assignees and travel to foreign countries.

55

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan- Chapter 17, Headquarters Security Officer Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 17, Headquarters Security Officer Program Describes the requirement for all HQ elements to appoint a Headquarters Security Officer (HSO) and Alternate HSO to perform certain security functions in behalf of the elements employees and contractors. This chapter also describes HSO duties, training requirements, and resources.

56

PROJECT MANGEMENT PLAN EXAMPLES Facility End State Decisions Examples  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Facility End State Decisions Examples Facility End State Decisions Examples Example 3 3.0 POST DEACTIVATION END STATE VISION The Heavy Water Facility is scheduled to cease moderator operations and commence final shutdown of moderator processing and processing support systems. The Heavy Water Facility and supporting facilities will be declared excess. Deactivation will place the facilities into a passively safe, minimal cost, long term S&M mode. At the end of the deactivation period, the facilities will be categorized "Radiological" and "Other Industrial Use". The following deactivation end state is envisioned: Moderator Processing and Moderator Storage Buildings The deactivation of the moderator processing and storage buildings will remove the moderator storage drums

57

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

10 10 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security Clearance Decisions-2010 Dataset Summary Description adjudication of security clearance cases for contractor personnel Tags {"security clearance","national security","defense industry","defense contractor"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/17/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4459 Public Access Level public Data Dictionary http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/ Data Download URL http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/2010

58

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 2 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security Clearance Decisions-2002 Dataset Summary Description adjudication of security clearance cases for contractor personnel Tags {"security clearance","national security","defense industry","defense contractor"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/09/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4451 Public Access Level public Data Dictionary http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/ Data Download URL http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/2002

59

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 6 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security Clearance Decisions-2006 Dataset Summary Description adjudication of security clearance cases for contractor personnel Tags {"security clearance","national security","defense industry","defense contractor"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/13/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4455 Public Access Level public Data Dictionary http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/ Data Download URL http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/2006

60

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 3 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security Clearance Decisions-2003 Dataset Summary Description adjudication of security clearance cases for contractor personnel Tags {"security clearance","national security","defense industry","defense contractor"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/10/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4452 Public Access Level public Data Dictionary http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/ Data Download URL http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/2003

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 8 Law Data/Tools Law You are here Data.gov » Communities » Law » Data Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals Decisions- Industrial Security Clearance Decisions-2008 Dataset Summary Description adjudication of security clearance cases for contractor personnel Tags {"security clearance","national security","defense industry","defense contractor"} Dataset Ratings Overall 0 No votes yet Data Utility 0 No votes yet Usefulness 0 No votes yet Ease of Access 0 No votes yet Dataset Additional Information Last Updated 05/15/2011 Publisher Department of Defense Contact Name Contact Email dohastatus@osdgc.osd.mil Unique Identifier DOD-4457 Public Access Level public Data Dictionary http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/ Data Download URL http://www.dod.gov/dodgc/doha/industrial/2008

62

Groundbreaking at National Ignition Facility | National Nuclear Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Groundbreaking at National Ignition Facility | National Nuclear Security Groundbreaking at National Ignition Facility | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Our History > NNSA Timeline > Groundbreaking at National Ignition Facility Groundbreaking at National Ignition Facility May 29, 1997 Livermore, CA Groundbreaking at National Ignition Facility

63

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan- Chapter 9, Technical Surveillance Countermeasures  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 9, Technical Surveillance Countermeasures Describes the DOE Headquarters Technical Security Countermeasures (TSCM) Program.

64

Facilities & Projects | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Nuclear Security Administration People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure...

65

Facility Software Quality Assurance for Capital Project Decisions RM  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Facility Software Quality Assurance (SQA) for Facility Software Quality Assurance (SQA) for Capital Project Critical Decisions Review Module March 2010 OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Standard Review Plan (SRP) Facility Software Quality Assurance (SQA) for Capital Project Critical Decisions Review Module Critical Decision (CD) Applicability CD-0 CD-1 CD-2 CD-3 CD-4 Post Operation March 2010 Standard Review Plan, 2 nd Edition, March 2010 FOREWORD The Standard Review Plan (SRP) 1 provides a consistent, predictable corporate review framework to ensure that issues and risks that could challenge the success of Office of Environmental Management (EM) projects are identified early and addressed proactively. The internal EM project review process encompasses key milestones established by DOE O 413.3A, Change 1,

66

Negotiation of Multilateral Security Decisions for Grid Computing Li Zhou Clifford Neuman  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Negotiation of Multilateral Security Decisions for Grid Computing Li Zhou Clifford Neuman Architecture that facilitates the collaboration in making security decisions for grid services. In particular security decisions according to the level of trust among grid service providers. 1. Introduction The grid

Hwang, Kai

67

Uranium Processing Facility | Y-12 National Security Complex  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

About / Transforming Y-12 / Uranium Processing Facility About / Transforming Y-12 / Uranium Processing Facility Uranium Processing Facility UPF will be a state-of-the-art, consolidated facility for enriched uranium operations including assembly, disassembly, dismantlement, quality evaluation, and product certification. An integral part of Y-12's transformation efforts and a key component of the National Nuclear Security Administration's Uranium Center of Excellence, the Uranium Processing Facility is one of two facilities at Y-12 whose joint mission will be to accomplish the storage and processing of all enriched uranium in one much smaller, centralized area. Safety, security and flexibility are key design attributes of the facility, which is in the preliminary design phase of work. UPF will be built to modern standards and engage new technologies through a responsive and agile

68

Facility will focus on bioenergy, global food security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Facility will focus on bioenergy, global food security Facility will focus on bioenergy, global food security Facility will focus on bioenergy, global food security The New Mexico Consortium expects to complete the 27,000 square foot laboratory and office facility next spring. May 22, 2012 Aerial view of Los Alamos National Laboratory Aerial view of Los Alamos National Laboratory. Contact Kevin Roark Communications Office (505) 665-9202 Email Los Alamos, N.M., May 22, 2012 - U.S. Senator Tom Udall (D-NM) spoke at the groundbreaking ceremony marking the start of construction on the New Mexico Consortium's (NMC) biological research facility last Friday afternoon. Senator Udall noted New Mexico's novel and extensive contributions to our nation's renewable energy efforts and congratulated LANL, the NMC, and Richard Sayre on their commitment to advancing the nations goals for energy

69

National Laser User Facilities Program | National Nuclear Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Laser User Facilities Program | National Nuclear Security Laser User Facilities Program | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog National Laser User Facilities Program Home > National Laser User Facilities Program National Laser User Facilities Program National Laser Users' Facility Grant Program Overview The Laboratory for Laser Energetics (LLE) at the University of Rochester

70

National Laser User Facilities Program | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

User Facilities Program | National Nuclear Security User Facilities Program | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog National Laser User Facilities Program Home > National Laser User Facilities Program National Laser User Facilities Program National Laser Users' Facility Grant Program Overview The Laboratory for Laser Energetics (LLE) at the University of Rochester

71

Insider threat to secure facilities: data analysis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Three data sets drawn from industries that have experienced internal security breaches are analyzed. The industries and the insider security breaches are considered analogous in one or more respects to insider threats potentially confronting managers in the nuclear industry. The three data sets are: bank fraud and embezzlement (BF and E), computer-related crime, and drug theft from drug manufacturers and distributors. A careful analysis by both descriptive and formal statistical techniques permits certain general conclusions on the internal threat to secure industries to be drawn. These conclusions are discussed and related to the potential insider threat in the nuclear industry. 49 tabs.

Not Available

1980-05-09T23:59:59.000Z

72

High Explosives Application Facility | National Nuclear Security...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

at the micron scale in its microdetonics laboratory, and utilizing multiple firing tanks for larger scale explosives experiments. No other facility in the world supports such...

73

National Ignition Facility | National Nuclear Security Administration  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

other ICF high energy density facilities leading to demonstrate fusion ignition and thermonuclear burn in the laboratory. The NIF is also being used to support basic science and...

74

NNSA Holds Groundbreaking at MOX Facility | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Groundbreaking at MOX Facility | National Nuclear Security Groundbreaking at MOX Facility | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Our History > NNSA Timeline > NNSA Holds Groundbreaking at MOX Facility NNSA Holds Groundbreaking at MOX Facility October 14, 2005 Aiken, SC NNSA Holds Groundbreaking at MOX Facility

75

National Laser Users' Facility Grant Program | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Users' Facility Grant Program | National Nuclear Security Users' Facility Grant Program | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog NLUF National Laser Users' Facility Grant Program Home > About Us > Our Programs > Defense Programs > Office of Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation > University Partnerships / Academic Alliances > National Laser Users' Facility Grant Program

76

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan- Chapter 16, Equivalencies and Exemptions  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 16, Equivalencies and Exemptions Describes DOE Headquarters procedures for requesting Equivalencies and Exemptions to DOE security directives.

77

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan- Chapter 12, Special Access Programs  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 12, Special Access Programs Describes DOE Headquarters procedures for reporting, investigating, and correcting Incidents of Security Concern.

78

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan- Chapter 7, Surveys and Reviews  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 7, Surveys and Reviews Describes DOE Headquarters procedures for conducting various types of security reviews and assessments and correcting findings.

79

A nuclear facility Security Analyzer written in PROLOG  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Security Analyzer project was undertaken to use the Prolog ''artificial intelligence'' programming language and Entity-Relationship database construction techniques to produce an intelligent database computer program capable of analyzing the effectiveness of a nuclear facility's security systems. The Security Analyzer program can search through a facility to find all possible surreptitious entry paths that meet various user-selected time and detection probability criteria. The program can also respond to user-formulated queries concerning the database information. The intelligent database approach allows the program to perform a more comprehensive path search than other programs that only find a single ''optimal'' path. The program also is more flexible in that the database, once constructed, can be interrogated and used for purposes independent of the searching function.

Zimmerman, B.D.

1987-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

80

Performing Energy Security Assessments - A How-To Guide for Federal Facility Managers  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Performing Energy Security Assessments - Performing Energy Security Assessments - A How-To Guide for Federal Facility Managers ii Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ v 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Facilities to be Assessed...........................................................................................................................1 2. BEGINNING THE ENERGY SECURITY ASSESSMENT PROCESS ............................... 2 2.1 Assign an Energy Security Manager .........................................................................................................2 2.2 Define the Mission of the Installation

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Performing Energy Security Assessments - A How-To Guide for Federal Facility Managers  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Performing Energy Security Assessments - Performing Energy Security Assessments - A How-To Guide for Federal Facility Managers ii Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ v 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Facilities to be Assessed...........................................................................................................................1 2. BEGINNING THE ENERGY SECURITY ASSESSMENT PROCESS ............................... 2 2.1 Assign an Energy Security Manager .........................................................................................................2 2.2 Define the Mission of the Installation

82

Performing Energy Security Assessments- A How-To Guide for Federal Facility Managers  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Guide describes the best practices and recommended process for federal facility managers to prepare for the following sections of a facilitys energy security plan: vulnerability assessments, energy preparedness and operations plans, and remedial action plans.

83

INDUSTRIAL CONTROL SYSTEM CYBER SECURITY: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS RELEVANT TO NUCLEAR FACILITIES, SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Typical questions surrounding industrial control system (ICS) cyber security always lead back to: What could a cyber attack do to my system(s) and; how much should I worry about it? These two leading questions represent only a fraction of questions asked when discussing cyber security as it applies to any program, company, business, or organization. The intent of this paper is to open a dialog of important pertinent questions and answers that managers of nuclear facilities engaged in nuclear facility security and safeguards should examine, i.e., what questions should be asked; and how do the answers affect an organization's ability to effectively safeguard and secure nuclear material. When a cyber intrusion is reported, what does that mean? Can an intrusion be detected or go un-noticed? Are nuclear security or safeguards systems potentially vulnerable? What about the digital systems employed in process monitoring, and international safeguards? Organizations expend considerable efforts to ensure that their facilities can maintain continuity of operations against physical threats. However, cyber threats particularly on ICSs may not be well known or understood, and often do not receive adequate attention. With the disclosure of the Stuxnet virus that has recently attacked nuclear infrastructure, many organizations have recognized the need for an urgent interest in cyber attacks and defenses against them. Several questions arise including discussions about the insider threat, adequate cyber protections, program readiness, encryption, and many more. These questions, among others, are discussed so as to raise the awareness and shed light on ways to protect nuclear facilities and materials against such attacks.

Robert S. Anderson; Mark Schanfein; Trond Bjornard; Paul Moskowitz

2011-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

84

Webinar: Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Video recording and text version of the webinar titled, Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers, originally presented on May 8, 2012.

85

Socioeconomics in supply chain management: a case study analysis of facility location decisions with GIS  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Facility location decisions are considered the most critical part of the supply chain and are vital for efficient and effective flow of goods and materials. Engineers and planners continue to recognise the uncertainty regarding future conditions with facility location decisions and realise the fact that transportation decisions are often on short notice in response to facility changes. Environmental justice assessment has traditionally focused on identifying distributive effects to protected populations. No quantitative comparisons of supply chain facility location decisions on protected populations have been reported in the literature. The objective of this research is to develop a multi-objective framework for integrating the socioeconomic effects of facility location decisions on protected populations. Various socioeconomic factors are integrated with geographic information systems to determine the extent of impact of supply chain facility locations on protected populations. A case study is performed to examine the robustness of the developed methodology.

Coray Davis

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

86

2014 HEADQUARTERS FACILITIES MASTER SECURITY PLAN- CHAPTER 13, CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

2014 HEADQUARTERS FACILITIES MASTER SECURITY PLAN - CHAPTER 13, CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Describes DOE Headquarters procedures for protecting Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI).

87

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan- Chapter 5, Classified Matter Protection and Control  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 5, Classified Matter Protection and Control Describes DOE Headquarters procedures for protecting classified information from its creation through its destruction.

88

Facility Security Checklist U.S. Department of Transportation  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

was the last time security logs and/or incident reports were reviewed? 25. Is there a current security plan

Goodman, Robert M.

89

Oak Ridge Facilities Construction | Y-12 National Security Complex  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Facilities ... Oak Ridge Facilities Construction Work in wet and mud was common during the construction of Oak Ridge facilities...

90

Decision Support Facility for the APS Control System  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The Advanced Photon Source is now in its fifth year of routine beam production. The EPICS-based [1] control system has entered the phase in its life cycle where new control algorithms must be implemented under increasingly stringent operational and reliability requirements. The sheer volume of the control system (~270,000 records, ~145 VME-based input-output controllers (IOCs), and ~7,000,000 lines of EPICS ASCII configuration code), presents a daunting challenge for code maintenance. The present work describes a relational database that provides an integrated view of the interacting components of the entire APS control system, including the IOC low-level logic, the physical wiring documentation, and high-level client applications. The database is extracted (booted) from the same operational CVS repository as that used to load the active IOCs. It provides site-wide decision support facilities to inspect and trace control flow and to identify client (e.g., user interface) programs involved at any selected poin...

Dohan, D A

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

91

Altering Design Decisions to Better Suit Facilities Management Processes  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Research work reported in this paper tackles the communication between processes of both facilities management (FM) and design, showing the effect of such communication on the capability of newly built facilities in supporting organizations...

Jawdeh, H. B.; Abudul-Malak, M. A.; Wood, G.

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

92

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 1...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Master Security Plan - Chapter 1, Physical Security This chapter covers the procedures adopted by HQ to implement directives governing the physical protection of U.S...

93

EM Issues Amended Decision to Expand Use of Nuclear Facility | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Issues Amended Decision to Expand Use of Nuclear Facility Issues Amended Decision to Expand Use of Nuclear Facility EM Issues Amended Decision to Expand Use of Nuclear Facility April 1, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis H-Canyon at Savannah River Site. The building is called a canyon because of its long rectangular shape and two continuous trenches that contains process vessels. H-Canyon at Savannah River Site. The building is called a canyon because of its long rectangular shape and two continuous trenches that contains process vessels. AIKEN, S.C. - EM issued an amended Record of Decision (ROD) to the Savannah River Site (SRS) Spent Nuclear Fuel Environmental Impact Statement to expand the operations of the H-Canyon Facility at SRS to support a major nuclear non-proliferation goal and save taxpayer dollars. DOE recently signed a contract allowing Atomic Energy of Canada Limited

94

EM Issues Amended Decision to Expand Use of Nuclear Facility | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EM Issues Amended Decision to Expand Use of Nuclear Facility EM Issues Amended Decision to Expand Use of Nuclear Facility EM Issues Amended Decision to Expand Use of Nuclear Facility April 1, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis H-Canyon at Savannah River Site. The building is called a canyon because of its long rectangular shape and two continuous trenches that contains process vessels. H-Canyon at Savannah River Site. The building is called a canyon because of its long rectangular shape and two continuous trenches that contains process vessels. AIKEN, S.C. - EM issued an amended Record of Decision (ROD) to the Savannah River Site (SRS) Spent Nuclear Fuel Environmental Impact Statement to expand the operations of the H-Canyon Facility at SRS to support a major nuclear non-proliferation goal and save taxpayer dollars. DOE recently signed a contract allowing Atomic Energy of Canada Limited

95

DOE/DHS INDUSTRIAL CONTROL SYSTEM CYBER SECURITY PROGRAMS: A MODEL FOR USE IN NUCLEAR FACILITY SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Many critical infrastructure sectors have been investigating cyber security issues for several years especially with the help of two primary government programs. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National SCADA Test Bed and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Control Systems Security Program have both implemented activities aimed at securing the industrial control systems that operate the North American electric grid along with several other critical infrastructure sectors (ICS). These programs have spent the last seven years working with industry including asset owners, educational institutions, standards and regulating bodies, and control system vendors. The programs common mission is to provide outreach, identification of cyber vulnerabilities to ICS and mitigation strategies to enhance security postures. The success of these programs indicates that a similar approach can be successfully translated into other sectors including nuclear operations, safeguards, and security. The industry regulating bodies have included cyber security requirements and in some cases, have incorporated sets of standards with penalties for non-compliance such as the North American Electric Reliability Corporation Critical Infrastructure Protection standards. These DOE and DHS programs that address security improvements by both suppliers and end users provide an excellent model for nuclear facility personnel concerned with safeguards and security cyber vulnerabilities and countermeasures. It is not a stretch to imagine complete surreptitious collapse of protection against the removal of nuclear material or even initiation of a criticality event as witnessed at Three Mile Island or Chernobyl in a nuclear ICS inadequately protected against the cyber threat.

Robert S. Anderson; Mark Schanfein; Trond Bjornard; Paul Moskowitz

2011-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

96

Facilities  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Facilities Facilities Facilities LANL's mission is to develop and apply science and technology to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. nuclear deterrent; reduce global threats; and solve other emerging national security and energy challenges. Contact Operator Los Alamos National Laboratory (505) 667-5061 Some LANL facilities are available to researchers at other laboratories, universities, and industry. Unique facilities foster experimental science, support LANL's security mission DARHT accelerator DARHT's electron accelerators use large, circular aluminum structures to create magnetic fields that focus and steer a stream of electrons down the length of the accelerator. Tremendous electrical energy is added along the way. When the stream of high-speed electrons exits the accelerator it is

97

Assessment of Nuclear Safety Culture at the Y-12 National Security Complex Urnaium Processing Facility Project, June 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Y-12 National Security Complex Y-12 National Security Complex Uranium Processing Facility Project May 2011 June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Independent Oversight Assessment of Safety Culture at the Y-12 National Security Complex Uranium Processing Facility Project Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Scope and Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 Results and Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 3

98

Assessment of Nuclear Safety Culture at the Y-12 National Security Complex Urnaium Processing Facility Project, June 2012  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Y-12 National Security Complex Y-12 National Security Complex Uranium Processing Facility Project May 2011 June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Independent Oversight Assessment of Safety Culture at the Y-12 National Security Complex Uranium Processing Facility Project Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Scope and Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 Results and Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 3

99

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Review at the Nevada National Security Site  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NNSS-2011-001 NNSS-2011-001 Site: Nevada National Security Site Subject: Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Activity Report for the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Review at the Nevada National Security Site Dates of Activity 02/14/2011 - 02/17/2011 Report Preparer William Macon Activity Description/Purpose: The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), visited the Nevada Site Office (NSO) and the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) from February 14-17, 2011. The purpose of the visit was to observe the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) review and maintain operational awareness of NNSS activities. Result:

100

: The Resumption of Criticality Experiments Facility Operations at the Nevada National Security Site  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Resumption of Criticality Resumption of Criticality Experiments Facility Operations at the Nevada National Security Site OAS-M-13-09 September 2013 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 30, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRINCIPAL DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM: George W. Collard Assistant Inspector General for Audits Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The Resumption of Criticality Experiments Facility Operations at the Nevada National Security Site" BACKGROUND The mission of the Criticality Experiments Facility, located at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (Los Alamos) was to conduct nuclear criticality experiments and hands-on training in nuclear safeguards, criticality safety and emergency response in support of the National

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

A successful effort to involve stakeholders in a facility siting decision using LIPS with stakeholder involvement  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Local public opposition to federal bureaucratic decisions has resulted in public agencies rethinking the role of stakeholders in decision making. Efforts to include stakeholders directly in the decision-making process are on the increase. Unfortunately, many attempts to involve members of the public in decisions involving complex technical issues have failed. A key problem has been defining a meaningful role for the public in the process of arriving at a technical decision. This paper describes a successful effort by Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) in New Mexico to involve stakeholders in an important technical decision associated with its Environmental Restoration (ER) Project. The decision was where to locate a Corrective Action Management Unit (CAMU), a facility intended to consolidate and store wastes generated from the cleanup of hazardous waste sites. A formal priority setting process known as the Laboratory Integration Prioritization System (LIPS) was adapted to provide an approach for involving the public. Although rarely applied to stakeholder participation, the LIPS process proved surprisingly effective. It produced a consensus over a selected site and enhanced public trust and understanding of Project activities.

Merkhofer, L. [Applied Decision Analysis, Inc., Menlo Park, CA (United States); Conway, R. [Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States); Anderson, B. [Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States)

1995-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

102

Using vulnerability assessments to design facility safeguards and security systems  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Weapons Complex Reconfiguration (WCR) Program is meant to prepare the Department of Energy (DOE) weapons complex to meet the needs of the next century through construction of now facilities or upgrades-in-place at existing facilities. This paper describes how a vulnerability (VA) was used to identify potential S&S features for the conceptual design for a plutonium storage facility as part of the WCR Program. We distinguish those features of the design that need to be investigated at the conceptual stage from those that can be evaluated later. We also examined what protection features may allow reduced S&S operating costs, with the main focus on protective force costs. While some of these concepts hold the promise for significantly reducing life-cycle protective force costs, their use depends on resolving long-standing tradeoffs between S&S and safety, which are discussed in the study.

Snell, M.; Jaeger, C.

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

103

Towards an Experimental Testbed Facility for Cyber-Physical Security Research  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) are under great scrutiny due to large Smart Grid investments and recent high profile security vulnerabilities and attacks. Research into improved security technologies, communication models, and emergent behavior is necessary to protect these systems from sophisticated adversaries and new risks posed by the convergence of CPSs with IT equipment. However, cyber-physical security research is limited by the lack of access to universal cyber-physical testbed facilities that permit flexible, high-fidelity experiments. This paper presents a remotely-configurable and community-accessible testbed design that integrates elements from the virtual, simulated, and physical environments. Fusing data between the three environments enables the creation of realistic and scalable environments where new functionality and ideas can be exercised. This novel design will enable the research community to analyze and evaluate the security of current environments and design future, secure, cyber-physical technologies.

Edgar, Thomas W.; Manz, David O.; Carroll, Thomas E.

2012-01-07T23:59:59.000Z

104

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 570: Area 9 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report presents information supporting the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 570: Area 9 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada. This complies with the requirements of the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) that was agreed to by the State of Nevada; U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Environmental Management; U.S. Department of Defense; and DOE, Legacy Management. The purpose of the CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed.

Matthews, Patrick

2013-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

105

DOE | Office of Health, Safety and Security | 2012 Facility Representative,  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Facility Representative Facility Representative Office of Nuclear Safety Home Facility Representative Home Annual Facility Rep Workshop › 2012 › 2011 › 2010 › 2009 › 2008 › 2007 › 2006 › 2005 › 2004 › 2003 › 2002 › 2001 › 2000 DOE Safety Links › ORPS Info › Operating Experience › DOE Lessons Learned › Accident Investigation Assessment Tools › FR CRADs › Surveillance Guides › Manager's Guide for Safety and Health Subject Matter Links General Program Information › Program Mission Statement › Program Directives and Guidance › FR of the Year Award Program › FR of the Year Award › FR Program Assessment Guide (Appendix B, DOE STD 1063-2011) FR Quarterly Performance Indicators Training & Qualification Information › Qualification Standards › Energy Online Courses

106

Facility Energy Decision System (FEDS) Assessment Report for US Army Garrison, Japan - Honshu Installations  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents an assessment was performed by a team of engineers from Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) under contract to the Installation Management Command (IMCOM) Pacific Region Office (PARO). The effort used the Facility Energy Decision System (FEDS) model to determine how energy is consumed at five U.S. Army Garrison-Japan (USAG-J) installations in the Honshu area, identify the most cost-effective energy retrofit measures, and calculate the potential energy and cost savings.

Kora, Angela R.; Brown, Daryl R.; Dixon, Douglas R.

2010-03-09T23:59:59.000Z

107

Headquarters Security Operations  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

DOE strengthens national security by protecting personnel, facilities, property, classified information, and sensitive unclassified information for DOE Headquarters facilities in the National Capital Area under normal and abnormal (i.e., emergency) conditions; manages access authorization functions; ensures that executives and dignitaries are fully protected, and supports efforts to ensure the continuity of government in all circumstances as mandated by Presidential Decision Directive.

108

Headquarters Security Operations | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Headquarters Security Operations Headquarters Security Operations Headquarters Security Operations Mission The Office of Headquarters Security Operations strengthens national security by protecting personnel, facilities, property, classified information, and sensitive unclassified information for DOE Headquarters facilities in the National Capital Area under normal and abnormal (i.e., emergency) conditions; managing access authorization functions; ensuring that executives and dignitaries are fully protected, and supporting efforts to ensure the continuity of government in all circumstances as mandated by Presidential Decision Directive. The Office is the database owner for the principal personnel security information processing activities of the Department and personnel security administrative review process.

109

The Joint Actinide Shock Physics Experimental Research Facility at the Nevada National Security Site, OAS-L-12-05  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Joint Actinide Shock Physics Joint Actinide Shock Physics Experimental Research Facility at the Nevada National Security Site OAS-L-12-05 April 2012 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 April 23, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, NEVADA SITE OFFICE FROM: David Sedillo, Director Western Audits Division Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The Joint Actinide Shock Physics Experimental Research Facility at the Nevada National Security Site" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's, Joint Actinide Shock Physics Experimental Research (JASPER) facility plays an integral role in the certification of the Nation's nuclear weapons stockpile by providing a method to generate and measure data

110

Materials and Security Consolidation Complex Facilities Radioactive Waste Management Basis and DOE Manual 435.1-1 Compliance Tables  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Department of Energy Order 435.1, 'Radioactive Waste Management,' along with its associated manual and guidance, requires development and maintenance of a radioactive waste management basis for each radioactive waste management facility, operation, and activity. This document presents a radioactive waste management basis for Idaho National Laboratory's Materials and Security Consolidation Center facilities that manage radioactive waste. The radioactive waste management basis for a facility comprises existing laboratory-wide and facility-specific documents. Department of Energy Manual 435.1-1, 'Radioactive Waste Management Manual,' facility compliance tables also are presented for the facilities. The tables serve as a tool for developing the radioactive waste management basis.

Not Listed

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

111

Record of Decision for the Electrical Interconnection of the COB Energy Facility (DOE/EIS-0343) (08/20/04)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

COB Energy Facility COB Energy Facility DECISION The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has decided to offer contract terms for interconnection of the COB Energy Facility with the Federal Columbia River Transmission System (FCRTS), as proposed in the COB Energy Facility Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) (DOE/EIS-0343, June 2004). Proposed by Peoples Energy Resources Company (PERC), the COB Energy Facility involves constructing and operating a new 1,160- megawatt (MW) natural gas-fired, combined-cycle power generation facility at a 50.6-acre site near Bonanza in Klamath County, Oregon, and a 7.2-mile-long 500-kilovolt (kV) transmission line south to BPA's Captain Jack Substation. A Generation Interconnection Agreement with PERC would provide for interconnection of the COB Energy Facility with the FCRTS and

112

The Use of Staff Augmentation Subcontracts at the National Nuclear Security Administration's Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility, IG-0887  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

The Use of Staff Augmentation The Use of Staff Augmentation Subcontracts at National Nuclear Security Administration's Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility DOE/IG-0887 May 2013 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 May 15, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The Use of Staff Augmentation Subcontracts at the National Nuclear Security Administration's Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility" BACKGROUND Shaw AREVA MOX Services, LLC (MOX Services) is responsible for the design and construction of the National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) nearly $5 billion Mixed

113

Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers OCTOBER 2011 Fuel Cell Technologies Program Oak Ridge National Laboratory 2 October 2011 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily

114

Security  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Security refers to the security of the stream of principal and interest repayments and what happens in the event that a secured loan defaults.

115

Office of Headquarters Security Operations  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Headquarters Security Operations strengthens national security by protecting personnel, facilities, property, classified information, and sensitive unclassified information for DOE Headquarters facilities in the National Capital Area under normal and abnormal (i.e., emergency) conditions; managing access authorization functions for Headquarters; ensuring that executives and dignitaries are fully protected, and supporting efforts to ensure the continuity of government in all circumstances as mandated by Presidential Decision Directive.

116

3S (Safeguards, Security, Safety) based pyroprocessing facility safety evaluation plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The big advantage of pyroprocessing for the management of spent fuels against the conventional reprocessing technologies lies in its proliferation resistance since the pure plutonium cannot be separated from the spent fuel. The extracted materials can be directly used as metal fuel in a fast reactor, and pyroprocessing reduces drastically the volume and heat load of the spent fuel. KAERI has implemented the SBD (Safeguards-By-Design) concept in nuclear fuel cycle facilities. The goal of SBD is to integrate international safeguards into the entire facility design process since the very beginning of the design phase. This paper presents a safety evaluation plan using a conceptual design of a reference pyroprocessing facility, in which 3S (Safeguards, Security, Safety)-By-Design (3SBD) concept is integrated from early conceptual design phase. The purpose of this paper is to establish an advanced pyroprocessing hot cell facility design concept based on 3SBD for the successful realization of pyroprocessing technology with enhanced safety and proliferation resistance.

Ku, J.H.; Choung, W.M.; You, G.S.; Moon, S.I.; Park, S.H.; Kim, H.D. [Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute - KAERI, 989-111 Daeduk-daero, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-353 (Korea, Republic of)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

117

Office of Headquarters Security Operations | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Headquarters Security Headquarters Security Operations Office of Headquarters Security Operations Mission The Office of Headquarters Security Operations strengthens national security by protecting personnel, facilities, property, classified information, and sensitive unclassified information for DOE Headquarters facilities in the National Capital Area under normal and abnormal (i.e., emergency) conditions; managing access authorization functions; ensuring that executives and dignitaries are fully protected, and supporting efforts to ensure the continuity of government in all circumstances as mandated by Presidential Decision Directive. The Office is the database owner for the principal personnel security information processing activities of the Department and personnel security administrative review process.

118

Decision Summaries | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) December 7, 2012 Summary of Decisions - December 3, 2012 - December 7, 2012 Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR...

119

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan- Chapter 2, Limited Areas, Vault-Type Rooms and Temporary Limited Areas  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 2, Limited Areas, Valut-Type Rooms and Temporary Limited Areas Describes DOE Headquarters procedures for establishing, maintaining, and deactivating Limited Areas and Vault-Type Rooms and protecting the classified information handled within those Areas.

120

Record of Decision for the Electrical Interconnection of the Chehalis Generation Facility (DOE/EIS-0230)(5/17/01)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Bonneville Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Record of Decision for the Electrical Interconnection of the Chehalis Generation Facility May 2001 _______________________________________________________ SUMMARY Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has decided to offer contracts for integrating power from the Chehalis Generation Facility (CGF) into the Federal Columbia River Transmission System (FCRTS). These contracts will facilitate integration of power from CGF into the FCRTS for delivery to the wholesale power market. In reaching this decision, I have considered the potential environmental impacts addressed in BPA's Resource Contingency Program Environmental Impact Statement (RCP EIS, DOE/EIS-0230, November 1995), Supplement Analysis (SA, DOE/EIS-0230/SA-02, May 9, 2001), BPA's Business Plan Environmental Impact Statement (BP EIS, DOE/EIS-

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 22, 2012 August 22, 2012 PSH-12-0065 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is a contractor employee at a DOE facility. Exhibit (Ex.) 10 at 3. The Local Security Office (LSO) discovered that the Individual failed to list a 2004 Driving Under the Influence (DUI) arrest in a Questionnaire for National Security Positions form completed in October 2011. Ex. 10 at 10. August 22, 2012 PSH-12-0045 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an Individual's DOE security clearance should be restored. The Individual had been caught viewing pornography on a DOE workplace computer. August 17, 2012 PSH-12-0048 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an

122

Record of Decision for the Electrical Interconnection of the Plymouth Generating Facility (DOE/EIS-0345)(10/14/03)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

for the Electrical Interconnection of the Plymouth Generating Facility October 2003 THE DECISION The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has decided to implement the proposed action identified in the Plymouth Generating Facility (PGF) Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) (DOE/EIS-0345, June 2003). The PGF, which has been proposed by Plymouth Energy, LLC (Plymouth Energy), involves construction and operation of a 307-megawatt (MW) natural gas-fired, combined-cycle power generation facility on a 44.5-acre site 2 miles west of Plymouth in Benton County, Washington. Under the proposed action, BPA will offer contract terms for interconnection of the PGF into the Federal Columbia River Transmission System (FCRTS) at BPA's proposed McNary-John Day 500-kilovolt (kV) transmission line at a point approximately

123

Office of Security Operations: Mission and Functions  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Mission and Functions Mission and Functions Mission The Office of Headquarters Security Operations strengthens national security by protecting personnel, facilities, property, classified information, and sensitive unclassified information for DOE Headquarters facilities in the National Capital Area under normal and abnormal (i.e., emergency) conditions; managing access authorization functions; ensuring that executives and dignitaries are fully protected, and supporting efforts to ensure the continuity of government in all circumstances as mandated by Presidential Decision Directive. The Office is the database owner for the principal personnel security information processing activities of the Department and personnel security administrative review process. Functions

124

When Do Their Casualties Count? Exploring Wartime Decisions that Pit Security Against Harm  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

selected to test the model. Central in this chapter will be two theoretical views of the model: one to explain decision outcome, based on prospect theory, and the other to explicate the choice process using the fundamentals of the Cognitive Calculus...

Roblyer, Dwight Andrew

2011-02-22T23:59:59.000Z

125

Security | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Security Security Security Security program under Office of Health, Safety and Security developes security policy, provides security expertise to assist field elements in planning site protection strategies and coordinates with domestic authorities to provide safeguards and security technical assistance, technical systems support, and technology development and deployment opportunities. Departmental Personnel Security, also ensures that Departmental personnel security programs (included the National Nuclear Security Administration) are consistent and effectively implemented. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan The purpose of the Headquarters Facility Master Security Plan (HQFMSP) is to inform employees, contractors, and visitors of the security procedures

126

Paducah DUF6 Conversion Facility: Record of Decision: As Published in the Federal Register  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

54 54 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2004 / Notices accordance with the comprehensive set of DOE requirements and applicable regulatory requirements that have been established to protect public health and the environment. These requirements encompass a wide variety of areas, including radiation protection, facility design criteria, fire protection, emergency preparedness and response, and operational safety requirements. * Cylinder management activities will be conducted in accordance with applicable DOE safety and environmental requirements, including the Cylinder Management Plan. * Temporary impacts on air quality from fugitive dust emissions during reconstruction of cylinder yards or construction of any new facility will be controlled by the best available

127

Composite Data Products (CDPs) from the Hydrogen Secure Data Center (HSDC) at the Energy Systems Integration Facility (ESIF), NREL  

DOE Data Explorer [Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)]

The Hydrogen Secure Data Center (HSDC) at NREL's Energy Systems Integration Facility (ESIF) plays a crucial role in NREL's independent, third-party analysis of hydrogen fuel cell technologies in real-world operation. NREL partners submit operational, maintenance, safety, and cost data to the HSDC on a regular basis. NREL's Technology Validation Team uses an internal network of servers, storage, computers, backup systems, and software to efficiently process raw data, complete quarterly analysis, and digest large amounts of time series data for data visualization. While the raw data are secured by NREL to protect commercially sensitive and proprietary information, individualized data analysis results are provided as detailed data products (DDPs) to the partners who supplied the data. Individual system, fleet, and site analysis results are aggregated into public results called composite data products (CDPs) that show the status and progress of the technology without identifying individual companies or revealing proprietary information. These CDPs are available from this NREL website: 1) Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicle and Infrastructure Learning Demonstration; 2) Early Fuel Cell Market Demonstrations; 3) Fuel Cell Technology Status [Edited from http://www.nrel.gov/hydrogen/facilities_secure_data_center.html].

128

Geothermal heating retrofit at the Utah State Prison Minimum Security Facility. Final report, March 1979-January 1986  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report is a summary of progress and results of the Utah State Prison Geothermal Space Heating Project. Initiated in 1978 by the Utah State Energy Office and developed with assistance from DOE's Division of Geothermal and Hydropower Technologies PON program, final construction was completed in 1984. The completed system provides space and water heating for the State Prison's Minimum Security Facility. It consists of an artesian flowing geothermal well, plate heat exchangers, and underground distribution pipeline that connects to the existing hydronic heating system in the State Prison's Minimum Security Facility. Geothermal water disposal consists of a gravity drain line carrying spent geothermal water to a cooling pond which discharges into the Jordan River, approximately one mile from the well site. The system has been in operation for two years with mixed results. Continuing operation and maintenance problems have reduced the expected seasonal operation from 9 months per year to 3 months. Problems with the Minimum Security heating system have reduced the expected energy contribution by approximately 60%. To date the system has saved the prison approximately $18,060. The total expenditure including resource assessment and development, design, construction, performance verification, and reporting is approximately $827,558.

Not Available

1986-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

129

Record of Decision: York County Energy Partners Cogeneration Facility, York County, Pennsylvania  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

37 37 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 161 / Monday, August 21, 1995 / Notices the 6-acre parcel for sale on a competitive basis to the private sector for industrial development similar to that in the surrounding Fort Holabird Industrial Park. It is anticipated up to three industrial/manufacturing operations could be located on the property, associated parking facilities, and infrastructure. Access to the facility would be through the Fort Holabird Industrial Park on South Road. Alternative 2 is to offer the 6-acre parcel for sale on a competitive bid basis to the private sector for development into a low density housing (4 units per acre) development, similar to that adjacent to the site. Under this alternative, approximately 24 homes and associated infrastructure would be

130

Record of Decision for the Electrical Interconnection of the COB Energy Facility (DOE/EIS-0343)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The COB Energy Facility would be constructed on a site near the rural community of Bonanza, in Klamath County, Oregon. Generating components of the project would be constructed in either one or two phases, including four air-cooled combustion turbine generators fueled with natural gas, four heat recovery steam generators, and two steam turbines. Additional facilities include a new 7.2-mile-long 500-kV transmission line, a new 4.1-mile-long natural gas pipeline, a 2.8-mile-long water pipeline, a 20-acre wastewater evaporation pond or a 3,770-foot-long irrigation pipeline to deliver wastewater to a 31-acre pasture, a 4.7-acre stormwater infiltration basin, a 1.5-acre stormwater retention pond, and various tanks, buildings, exhaust stacks, parking, and storage areas. Natural gas to fuel the combustion turbines would be supplied by way of a new 4.1-mile-long, 20-inch-diameter pipeline from a Gas Transmission Northwest's Bonanza Compressor Station. The new pipeline would be constructed within private easements adjacent to or near Klamath County road rights-of-way. Although COB Energy Facility generators would use air-cooled condensers, the project would use an average of 72 gallons per minute for steam production and station service, up to a maximum of 210 gallons per minute. The source of this water would be one existing and two new wells near the project site, drawing from a deep aquifer consistent with a State of Oregon water right permit expected to be incorporated into the State energy facility site certificate. Process wastewater would either be used to irrigate pasture or held in a lined pond to evaporate. Sanitary water would be routed to an onsite septic tank then discharged to a leach field. No wastewater would be discharged to surface waters. The COB Energy Facility would interconnect to the FCRTS at Captain Jack Substation, 7.2 miles south of the project site. PERC would construct a new 500-kV transmission line from the project site to Captain Jack Substation. Part of the transmission line would cross public land managed by the Bureau of Land Management. BPA would install additional electrical equipment at Captain Jack Substation. At this time, PERC has not requested specific points of delivery.

N /A

2004-08-20T23:59:59.000Z

131

Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 254: Area 25 R-MAD Decontamination Facility, Nevada Test Site, Nevada  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document identifies and rationalizes the US Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office's selection of a recommended corrective action alternative (CAA) appropriate to facilitate the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 254, R-MAD Decontamination Facility, under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Located in Area 25 at the Nevada Test Site in Nevada, CAU 254 is comprised of Corrective Action Site (CAS) 25-23-06, Decontamination Facility. A corrective action investigation for this CAS as conducted in January 2000 as set forth in the related Corrective Action Investigation Plan. Samples were collected from various media throughout the CAS and sent to an off-site laboratory for analysis. The laboratory results indicated the following: radiation dose rates inside the Decontamination Facility, Building 3126, and in the storage yard exceeded the average general dose rate; scanning and static total surface contamination surveys indicated that portions of the locker and shower room floor, decontamination bay floor, loft floor, east and west decon pads, north and south decontamination bay interior walls, exterior west and south walls, and loft walls were above preliminary action levels (PALs). The investigation-derived contaminants of concern (COCs) included: polychlorinated biphenyls, radionuclides (strontium-90, niobium-94, cesium-137, uranium-234 and -235), total volatile and semivolatile organic compounds, total petroleum hydrocarbons, and total Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (Metals). During the investigation, two corrective action objectives (CAOs) were identified to prevent or mitigate human exposure to COCs. Based on these CAOs, a review of existing data, future use, and current operations at the Nevada Test Site, three CAAs were developed for consideration: Alternative 1 - No Further Action; Alternative 2 - Unrestricted Release Decontamination and Verification Survey; and Alternative 3 - Unrestricted Release Decontamination and Verification Survey and Dismantling of Building 3126. These alternatives were evaluated based on four general corrective action standards and five remedy selection decision factors, and the preferred CAA chosen on technical merit was Alternative 2. This CAA was judged to meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated and applicable state and federal regulations for closure of the site, and reduce the potential for future exposure pathways.

U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office

2000-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

132

Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers, Solar Screening Evaluation Checklist, September 2010  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This guide presents an overview of the process for successfully planning for and installing solar technology on a federal site. It is specifically targeted to managers of federal buildings and sites, contracting officers, energy and sustainability officers, and regional procurement managers. The solar project process is outlined in a concise, easy-to-understand, step-by-step format. Information includes a brief overview of legislation and executive orders related to renewable energy and the compelling reasons for implementing a solar project on a federal site. It also includes how to assess a facility to identify the best solar installation site, project recommendations and considerations to help avoid unforeseen issues, and guidance on financing and contracting options. Case studies with descriptions of successful solar deployments across multiple agencies are presented. In addition, detailed information and sample documents for specific tasks are referenced with Web links or included in the appendixes. The guide concentrates on distributed solar generation and not large, centralized solar energy generation.

133

Appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility Safety Basis Preliminary Safety Design Report Process at the Y-12 National Security Complex, May 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Appraisal of the Appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility Safety Basis Preliminary Safety Design Report Process at the Y-12 National Security Complex May 2011 May 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U. S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background........................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Scope..................................................................................................................................................... 2

134

Appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility Safety Basis Preliminary Safety Design Report Process at the Y-12 National Security Complex, May 2013  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Appraisal of the Appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility Safety Basis Preliminary Safety Design Report Process at the Y-12 National Security Complex May 2011 May 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U. S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background........................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Scope..................................................................................................................................................... 2

135

Amended Record of Decision: Idaho High-Level Waste and Facilities Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0287) (11/28/06)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

811 Federal Register 811 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 28, 2006 / Notices Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339. [FR Doc. E6-20124 Filed 11-27-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000-01-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Amended Record of Decision: Idaho High-Level Waste and Facilities Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Amended Record of Decision. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is amending its Record of Decision (ROD) published December 19, 2005 (70 Federal Register [FR] 75165), pursuant to the Idaho High-Level Waste and Facilities Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement (Final EIS) (DOE/EIS-0287, September 2002). The Final EIS analyzed two sets of alternatives for accomplishing DOE's

136

Decision Summaries | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 13, 2013 Summary of Decisions - December 9, 2013 - December 13, 2013 Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)...

137

Security decision-making among interdependent organizations R. Ann Miura-Ko, Benjamin Yolken, John Mitchell, and Nicholas Bambos  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

the same passwords at several independent web sites, security deci- sions by one organization may have- ments of others. We apply this framework to investigate three examples: web site security with shared

Mitchell, John C.

138

Measurements at Los Alamos National Laboratory Plutonium Facility in Support of Global Security Mission Space  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Los Alamos National Laboratory Plutonium Facility at Technical Area (TA) 55 is one of a few nuclear facilities in the United States where Research & Development measurements can be performed on Safeguards Category-I (CAT-I) quantities of nuclear material. This capability allows us to incorporate measurements of CAT-IV through CAT-I materials as a component of detector characterization campaigns and training courses conducted at Los Alamos. A wider range of measurements can be supported. We will present an overview of recent measurements conducted in support of nuclear emergency response, nuclear counterterrorism, and international and domestic safeguards. This work was supported by the NNSA Office of Counterterrorism.

Stange, Sy [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Mayo, Douglas R. [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Herrera, Gary D. [Los Alamos National Laboratory; McLaughlin, Anastasia D. [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Montoya, Charles M. [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Quihuis, Becky A. [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Trujillo, Julio B. [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Van Pelt, Craig E. [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Wenz, Tracy R. [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2012-07-13T23:59:59.000Z

139

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 372: Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document (CADD)/Closure Report (CR) has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 372, Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters, located within Areas 18 and 20 at the Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO). Corrective Action Unit 372 comprises four corrective action sites (CASs): 18-45-02, Little Feller I Surface Crater 18-45-03, Little Feller II Surface Crater 20-23-01, U-20k Contamination Area 20-45-01, U-20L Crater (Cabriolet) The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 372 based on the implementation of the corrective action of closure in place with administrative controls at all CASs. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from November 9, 2009, through December 10, 2010, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 372: Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters. The approach for the CAI was divided into two facets: investigation of the primary release of radionuclides and investigation of other releases (migration in washes and chemical releases). The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 372 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on a data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Investigation results were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. A radiological dose FAL was established of 25 millirem per year based on the Remote Work Area exposure scenario (336 hours of annual exposure). Radiological doses exceeding the FAL were found to be present at all four CASs. It is assumed that radionuclide levels present within the Little Feller I and Cabriolet high contamination areas and within the craters at Palanquin and Cabriolet exceed the FAL. It is also assumed that potential source material in the form of lead bricks at Little Feller I and lead-acid batteries at Palanquin and Cabriolet exceed the FAL. Therefore, corrective actions were undertaken that consist of removing potential source material, where present, and implementing a use restriction and posting warning signs at each CAS. These use restrictions were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: No further corrective actions are necessary for CAU 372. A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 372. Corrective Action Unit 372 should be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

Matthews, Patrick and Sloop, Christy

2011-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

140

Supercomputing | Facilities | ORNL  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

facilities, and authorization checks for physical access. An integrated cyber security plan encompasses all aspects of computing. Cyber security plans are risk-based....

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 365: Baneberry Contamination Area, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Corrective Action Unit 365 comprises one corrective action site (CAS), CAS 08-23-02, U-8d Contamination Area. The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 365 based on the implementation of the corrective action of closure in place with a use restriction (UR). Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from January 18, 2011, through August 2, 2011, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 365: Baneberry Contamination Area. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 365 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on a data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is complete and acceptable for use in supporting the DQO decisions. Investigation results were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. A radiological dose FAL of 25 millirem per year was established based on the Remote Work Area exposure scenario (336 hours of annual exposure). Radiological doses exceeding the FAL were found to be present to the southwest of the Baneberry crater. It was also assumed that radionuclide levels present within the crater and fissure exceed the FAL. Corrective actions were undertaken that consisted of establishing a UR and posting warning signs for the crater, fissure, and the area located to the southwest of the crater where soil concentrations exceeded the FAL. These URs were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: (1) No further corrective actions beyond what are described in this document are necessary for CAU 365. (2) A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 365. (3) Corrective Action Unit 365 should be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

Patrick Matthews

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

142

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 567: Miscellaneous Soil Sites Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report presents information supporting the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 567: Miscellaneous Soil Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada. The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 567 based on the implementation of the corrective actions. The corrective actions implemented at CAU 567 were developed based on an evaluation of analytical data from the CAI, the assumed presence of COCs at specific locations, and the detailed and comparative analysis of the CAAs. The CAAs were selected on technical merit focusing on performance, reliability, feasibility, safety, and cost. The implemented corrective actions meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated. The CAAs meet all applicable federal and state regulations for closure of the site. Based on the implementation of these corrective actions, the DOE, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office provides the following recommendations: No further corrective actions are necessary for CAU 567. The Nevada Division of Environmental Protection issue a Notice of Completion to the DOE, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office for closure of CAU 567. CAU 567 be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

Matthews, Patrick

2014-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

143

Decision Summaries | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Decision Summaries Decision Summaries Decision Summaries RSS January 16, 2014 Summary of Decisions - December 30, 2013 - January 3, 2014 Decisions were issued on: - Privacy Act Appeal January 10, 2014 Summary of Decisions - MM DD YYYY - MM DD YYYY Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) December 27, 2013 Summary of Decisions - December 23, 2013 - December 27, 2013 Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) December 20, 2013 Summary of Decisions - December 16, 2013 - December 20, 2013 Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) December 13, 2013 Summary of Decisions - December 9, 2013 - December 13, 2013 Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal

144

Coordination Meeting with National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Field Office Safety Basis Review Team Leader for Transuranic Waste Facility Preiminary Documented Safety Analysis Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

HIAR-LANL-2013-04-08 HIAR-LANL-2013-04-08 Site: Los Alamos National Laboratory Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for Coordination Meeting with National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Field Office Safety Basis Review Team Leader for Transuranic Waste Facility Preliminary Documented Safety Analysis Report Dates of Activity : 04/08/13 Report Preparer: James O. Low Activity Description/Purpose: The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) staff visited the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) to coordinate with the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Los Alamos Field Office (NA-00-LA) Safety Basis Review Team (SBRT) Leader for review of the revised preliminary documented safety analysis (PDSA) for the Transuranic Waste

145

Coordination Meeting with National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Field Office Safety Basis Review Team Leader for Transuranic Waste Facility Preiminary Documented Safety Analysis Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HIAR-LANL-2013-04-08 HIAR-LANL-2013-04-08 Site: Los Alamos National Laboratory Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for Coordination Meeting with National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Field Office Safety Basis Review Team Leader for Transuranic Waste Facility Preliminary Documented Safety Analysis Report Dates of Activity : 04/08/13 Report Preparer: James O. Low Activity Description/Purpose: The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) staff visited the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) to coordinate with the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Los Alamos Field Office (NA-00-LA) Safety Basis Review Team (SBRT) Leader for review of the revised preliminary documented safety analysis (PDSA) for the Transuranic Waste

146

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 367: Area 10 Sedan, Ess and Uncle Unit Craters Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Corrective Action Unit 367 comprises four corrective action sites (CASs): 10-09-03, Mud Pit 10-45-01, U-10h Crater (Sedan) 10-45-02, Ess Crater Site 10-45-03, Uncle Crater Site The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation of the corrective actions and site closure activities implemented at CAU 367. A corrective action of closure in place with use restrictions was completed at each of the three crater CASs (10-45-01, 10-45-02, and 10-45-03); corrective actions were not required at CAS 10-09-03. In addition, a limited soil removal corrective action was conducted at the location of a potential source material release. Based on completion of these correction actions, no additional corrective action is required at CAU 367, and site closure is considered complete. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from February 2010 through March 2011, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 367: Area 10 Sedan, Ess and Uncle Unit Craters, Nevada Test Site, Nevada. The approach for the CAI was divided into two facets: investigation of the primary release of radionuclides, and investigation of non-test or other releases (e.g., migration in washes and potential source material). Based on the proximity of the Uncle, Ess, and Sedan craters, the impact of the Sedan test on the fallout deposited from the two earlier tests, and aerial radiological surveys, the CAU 367 investigation was designed to study the releases from the three crater CASs as one combined release (primary release). Corrective Action Site 10-09-03, Mud Pit, consists of two mud pits identified at CAU 367. The mud pits are considered non-test releases or other releases and were investigated independent of the three crater CASs. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 367 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on a data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is complete and acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Analytes detected during the CAI were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. For the primary release, radiological doses exceeding the FAL of 25 millirem per year were not found to be present in the surface or shallow subsurface soil outside the default contamination boundary. However, it was assumed that radionuclides are present in subsurface media within each of the three craters (Sedan, Ess, and Uncle) due to prompt injection of radionuclides from the tests. Based on the assumption of radiological dose exceeding the FAL, corrective actions were undertaken that consisted of implementing a use restriction and posting warning signs at each crater CAS. These use restrictions were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. With regard to other releases, no contaminants of concern were identified at the mud pits or any of the other release locations, with one exception. Potential source material in the form of lead was found at one location. A corrective action of clean closure was implemented at this location, and verification samples indicated that no further action is necessary. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 367. Corrective Action Unit 367 should be promoted from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

Patrick Matthews

2011-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

147

Summary of Decisions- April 14, 2014 April 18, 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

148

Summary of Decisions- September 29, 2014 October 3, 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

149

Summary of Decisions- December 9, 2013 December 13, 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

150

Summary of Decisions- December 10, 2012 December 14, 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

151

Summary of Decisions- December 22, 2014 December 26, 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal

152

Summary of Decisions- July 30 August 3, 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

153

Summary of Decisions- September 8, 2014 September 12, 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Whistleblower Appeal (10 CFR Part 708)

154

Summary of Decisions- November 24, 2014 November 28, 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal

155

Summary of Decisions- October 6, 2014 October 10, 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal

156

Summary of Decisions- January 19, 2015 January 23, 2015  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal

157

Summary of Decisions- July 14, 2014 July 18, 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

158

Summary of Decisions- June 2, 2014 June 6, 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

159

Summary of Decisions- September 30, 2013 October 4, 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Whistleblower Appeal (10 CFR Part 708)

160

Summary of Decisions- February 17, 2014 February 21, 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Summary of Decisions- October 27, 2014 October 31, 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal

162

Summary of Decisions- March 3, 2014 March 7, 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

163

Summary of Decisions- April 7, 2014 April 11, 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

164

Summary of Decisions- June 23, 2014 June 27, 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Whistleblower Appeal (10 CFR Part 708)

165

Summary of Decisions- January 27, 2014 January 31, 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

166

Summary of Decisions- February 9, 2015 February 13, 2015  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal

167

Summary of Decisions- July 21, 2014 July 25, 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

168

Facility Safety  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To establish facility safety requirements for the Department of Energy, including National Nuclear Security Administration. Cancels DOE O 420.1. Canceled by DOE O 420.1B.

2002-05-20T23:59:59.000Z

169

Facilities Management | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

and dispositions NE owned facilities and capabilities. The Idaho Site-Wide Safeguards and Security program ensures the safety, operability, and security of these...

170

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 105: Area 2 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report presents information supporting the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 105: Area 2 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada. CAU 105 comprises the following five corrective action sites (CASs): -02-23-04 Atmospheric Test Site - Whitney Closure In Place -02-23-05 Atmospheric Test Site T-2A Closure In Place -02-23-06 Atmospheric Test Site T-2B Clean Closure -02-23-08 Atmospheric Test Site T-2 Closure In Place -02-23-09 Atmospheric Test Site - Turk Closure In Place The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 105 based on the implementation of the corrective actions. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from October 22, 2012, through May 23, 2013, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 105: Area 2 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites; and in accordance with the Soils Activity Quality Assurance Plan, which establishes requirements, technical planning, and general quality practices.

Matthews, Patrick

2013-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

171

Final Status Survey Report for Corrective Action Unit 117 - Pluto Disassembly Facility, Building 2201, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document contains the process knowledge, radiological data and subsequent statistical methodology and analysis to support approval for the radiological release of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 117 Pluto Disassembly Facility, Building 2201 located in Area 26 of the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS). Preparations for release of the building began in 2009 and followed the methodology described in the Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM). MARSSIM is the DOE approved process for release of Real Property (buildings and landmasses) to a set of established criteria or authorized limits. The pre-approved authorized limits for surface contamination values and corresponding assumptions were established by DOE O 5400.5. The release criteria coincide with the acceptance criteria of the U10C landfill permit. The U10C landfill is the proposed location to dispose of the radiologically non-impacted, or clean, building rubble following demolition. However, other disposition options that include the building and/or waste remaining at the NNSS may be considered providing that the same release limits apply. The Final Status Survey was designed following MARSSIM guidance by reviewing historical documentation and radiological survey data. Following this review a formal radiological characterization survey was performed in two phases. The characterization revealed multiple areas of residual radioactivity above the release criteria. These locations were remediated (decontaminated) and then the surface activity was verified to be less than the release criteria. Once remediation efforts had been successfully completed, a Final Status Survey Plan (10-015, Final Status Survey Plan for Corrective Action Unit 117 Pluto Disassembly Facility, Building 2201) was developed and implemented to complete the final step in the MARSSIM process, the Final Status Survey. The Final Status Survey Plan consisted of categorizing each individual room into one of three categories: Class 1, Class 2 or Class 3 (a fourth category is a Non-Impacted Class which in the case of Building 2201 only pertained to exterior surfaces of the building.) The majority of the rooms were determined to fall in the less restrictive Class 3 category, however, Rooms 102, 104, 106, and 107 were identified as containing Class 1 and 2 areas. Building 2201 was divided into survey units and surveyed following the requirements of the Final Status Survey Plan for each particular class. As each survey unit was completed and documented, the survey results were evaluated. Each sample (static measurement) with units of counts per minute (cpm) was corrected for the appropriate background and converted to a value with units of dpm/100 cm2. With a surface contamination value in the appropriate units, it was compared to the surface contamination limits, or in this case the derived concentration guideline level (DCGLw). The appropriate statistical test (sign test) was then performed. If the survey unit was statistically determined to be below the DCGLw, then the survey unit passed and the null hypothesis (that the survey unit is above limits) was rejected. If the survey unit was equal to or below the critical value in the sign test, the null hypothesis was not rejected. This process was performed for all survey units within Building 2201. A total of thirty-three Class 1, four Class 2, and one Class 3 survey units were developed, surveyed, and evaluated. All survey units successfully passed the statistical test. Building 2201 meets the release criteria commensurate with the Waste Acceptance Criteria (for radiological purposes) of the U10C landfill permit residing within NNSS boundaries. Based on the thorough statistical sampling and scanning of the buildings interior, Building 2201 may be considered radiologically clean, or free of contamination.

Jeremy Gwin and Douglas Frenette

2010-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

172

Packaging and Transfer of Hazardous Materials and Materials of National Security Interest Assessment plan - Developed By NNSA/Nevada Site Office Facility Representative Division  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PACKAGING AND TRANSFER PACKAGING AND TRANSFER OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND MATERIALS OF NATIONAL SECURITY INTEREST Assessment Plan NNSA/Nevada Site Office Facility Representative Division Performance Objective: Verify that packaging and transportation safety requirements of hazardous materials and materials of national security interest have been established and are in compliance with DOE Orders 461.1 and 460.1B Criteria: Verify that safety requirements for the proper packaging and transportation of DOE/NNSA offsite shipments and onsite transfers of hazardous materials and for modal transport have been established [DOE O 460.1B, 1, "Objectives"]. Verify that the contractor transporting a package of hazardous materials is in compliance with the requirements of the Hazardous Materials Regulations

173

EIS-0350-S1: Amended Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

350-S1: Amended Record of Decision 350-S1: Amended Record of Decision EIS-0350-S1: Amended Record of Decision Nuclear Facility Portion of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building Replacement Project at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM For more information: Mr. George J. Rael Assistant Manager Environmental Operations NEPA Compliance Officer U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Site Office 3747 West Jemez Road, Los Alamos, NM 87544 Telephone: 505-606-0397 Electronic mail: NEPALASO@doeal.gov The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is issuing this Amended Record of Decision (AROD) for the Nuclear Facility portion of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building Replacement (CMRR) Project at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in

174

EIS-0350-S1: Amended Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Amended Record of Decision Amended Record of Decision EIS-0350-S1: Amended Record of Decision Nuclear Facility Portion of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building Replacement Project at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM For more information: Mr. George J. Rael Assistant Manager Environmental Operations NEPA Compliance Officer U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Site Office 3747 West Jemez Road, Los Alamos, NM 87544 Telephone: 505-606-0397 Electronic mail: NEPALASO@doeal.gov The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is issuing this Amended Record of Decision (AROD) for the Nuclear Facility portion of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building Replacement (CMRR) Project at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in

175

Office of Security Assistance  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Security Assistance manages the Technology Deployment Program to improve the security posture of the Department of Energy and the protection of its assets and facilities through the deployment of new safeguards and security technologies and development of advanced technologies that reduce operating costs, save protective force lives, and improve security effectiveness.

176

Audit of Selected Aspects of the Unclassified Computer Security Program at a DOE Headquarters Computing Facility, AP-B-95-02  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL AUDIT OF SELECTED ASPECTS OF THE UNCLASSIFIED COMPUTER SECURITY PROGRAM AT A DOE HEADQUARTERS COMPUTING FACILITY The Office of Inspector General wants to make the distribution of its reports as customer friendly and cost effective as possible. Therefore, this report will be available electronically through the Internet five to seven days after publication at the alternative addresses: Department of Energy Headquarters Gopher gopher.hr.doe.gov Department of Energy Headquarters Anonymous FTP vm1.hqadmin.doe.gov U.S. Department of Energy Human Resources and Administration Home Page

177

Decision Summaries | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 7, 2014 Summary of Decisions - March 3, 2014 - March 7, 2014 Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) February 21,...

178

Office of Security Policy  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Security Policy is the central source within the Department of Energy for the development and analysis of safeguards and security policies and standards affecting facilities, nuclear materials, personnel, and classified information.

179

Office of Information Security  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Information Security is responsible for implementation of the Classified Matter Protection and Control Program (CMPC), the Operations Security Program (OPSEC) and the Facility Clearance Program and the Survey Program for Headquarters

180

EIS-0161: Consolidated Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Consolidated Record of Decision Consolidated Record of Decision EIS-0161: Consolidated Record of Decision Tritium Supply and Recycling The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) completed the Tritium Supply and Recycling Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) (DOE/EIS-0161) in October 1995. The Tritium Supply and Recycling PEIS assessed the potential environmental impacts of technology and siting alternatives for the production of tritium for national security purposes as well as the impacts of constructing a new Tritium Extraction Facility (TEF) at the Department's Savannah River Site near Aiken, SC. DOE/EIS-0161, Consolidated Record of Decision for Tritium Supply and Recycling (May 1999) More Documents & Publications EIS-0288: Consolidated Record of Decision (EIS-0270 & EIS-0271)

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

2015 DOE Safety and Security Enforcement Workshop - Badging and...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

2015 DOE Safety and Security Enforcement Workshop - Badging and Facility Information 2015 DOE Safety and Security Enforcement Workshop - Badging and Facility Information January...

182

EIS-0236: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Transformation --Tritium Research and Development, Flight Test Transformation --Tritium Research and Development, Flight Test Operations, and Major Environmental Test Facilities The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), a separately organized agency within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), is issuing this Record of Decision (ROD) for the continued transformation of the nuclear weapons complex (Complex). The SPEIS analyzes the potential environmental impacts of alternatives for transforming the nuclear weapons complex into a smaller, more efficient enterprise that can respond to changing national security challenges and ensure the long-term safety, security, and reliability of the nuclear weapons stockpile! DOE/EIS-0236, Record of Decision for the Complex Transformation Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement--Tritium Research

183

Security Conditions  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To ensure that DOE uniformly meets the protection requirements specified in Presidential Decision Directive 39, "U.S. Policy on Counterterrorism (U)." Attachment 2 is no longer available online. Please e-mail your request for the Attachment to: Security.Directives@hq.doe.gov. DOE N 251.44, dated 05/06/02, extends this directive until 12/31/02.

2000-09-18T23:59:59.000Z

184

Successful Characterization Strategies for the Active High Risk Y-12 National Security Complex 9201-5 (Alpha-5) Facility, Oak Ridge, TN - 12164  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Building 9201-5 (Alpha 5) was completed in May 1944 and served as a production facility for National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Y-12 Weapons Plant. During the Manhattan Project, it functioned as a uranium enrichment facility. The facility was renovated and altered over the years, converting the calutrons to support other missions. Alpha 5 consists of 4 floors and a basement measuring approximately 600,000 square feet. The facility contains various pieces of equipment remaining from legacy operations. A significant amount (approximately 200,000 kgs) of mercury (Hg) has been spilled in the facility over the operational history of the building. To further complicate matters, beryllium (Be) contamination in 9201-5 is found throughout approximately sixty percent of the facility. Concentrations varying from very low (< 0.2 micrograms (?g)/100 cm{sup 2}) to areas where concentrations are relatively high, approximately 600 ?g/100 cm{sup 2}, in regulated beryllium areas. The primary site related contaminants (SRCs) for the waste in this facility are enriched uranium, depleted uranium, beryllium and mercury. This facility represents the highest environmental risk for DOE-ORO EM and NNSA at Y-12 and must be quickly addressed to minimize impacts to future Y-12 missions, as well as human health and the environment. As part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), approximately 700,000 cubic feet of legacy material was removed in 2010 and 2011. In addition, characterization of the 9201-5 facility was scheduled in the winter and spring of 2011. This activity was initiated in January 2011 and was completed in July 2011. Heavy schedule pressure was further complicated by the fact that this building has active utility, security and process systems. Given these complex variables, a unique, out of the box characterization strategy was forged in an effort to bound radiological and chemical contaminants, as well as providing the appropriate level of quality to ensure that this data could be used to develop waste profiles when deactivation, decontamination and demolition (D and D) activities are authorized at a future date. The characterization strategy involved a hybrid model of statistically-based and biased sampling events. To achieve the desired results, traditional intrusive sampling and laboratory analysis, as well as a number of field-based characterization methodologies (e.g., X-ray Fluorescence [XRF], Lumex and Non-Destructive Assay [NDA]) were utilized. Results were captured and synthesized into meaningful, usable conclusions in a facility characterization report that will more accurately aid D and D cost estimates for future remedial actions. This massive characterization campaign involved over 1,200 separate sample locations using 4 separate characterization methods and was successfully completed to meet a performance-based milestone within 8 months of initiation. (authors)

Birchfield, Joseph W. III [Link Technologies (United States); Albrecht, Linda [Alliant Corporation (United States)

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

185

Security | Argonne National Laboratory  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Security Security Nonproliferation and Nuclear Forensics Decision Science Sensors and Materials Security Enhancing national and homeland security requires technological advancements in everything from biosensors to risk assessments. Game-changing scientific discovery is required for the development of sensors, detectors and other technological advancements used to protect and defend our country. At Argonne, our highly collaborative community of scientists and engineers discover and develop critical security and defense technologies to prevent and mitigate events with the potential for mass disruption or destruction, thereby protecting our citizens and our national interests. Our goal is to make America a safer place through innovations in threat decision science, sensors and materials, infrastructure assurance,

186

CONTROLLING ACCESS TO UNIVERSITY FACILITIES 1. It is the Policy of Syracuse University that all electronically secured University buildings will  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

that all electronically secured University buildings will have a single access control system for managing for any building will be at the discretion of the Cabinet Officer assigned responsibility for the building or area of a building. Approval will be coordinated through the Department of Public Safety (DPS

Mather, Patrick T.

187

Sandia National Laboratories: Facilities  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

July 31, 2014, in DETL, Distribution Grid Integration, Energy, Energy Surety, Facilities, Grid Integration, Infrastructure Security, News, News & Events, Photovoltaic, Renewable...

188

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Facility Engineering Services KCP, LLC- November 2008  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This report summarizes the results of the HSS DOE-VPP Teams evaluation of Facilities Engineering Services KCP, LLC during the period of November 10-21, 2008, and provides the Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer with the necessary information to make the final decision regarding the companys continued participation in DOE-VPP as a Star site.

189

Office of Security Policy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Office of Security Policy Office of Security Policy Mission and Functions The Office of Security Policy develops and promulgates safeguards and security policy governing the protection of National Security and other critical assets entrusted to the Department. Director's Perspective Welcome to the Office of Security Policy Jack Cowden, Director The Office of Security Policy analyzes, develops and interprets safeguards and security policy governing national security functions and the protection of related critical assets entrusted to the Department. This includes the protection of DOE nuclear facilities, nuclear weapons components, special nuclear materials and classified information. Our broad topical areas are organized as: Program Planning and Management, Protection Program Operations (which includes both physical security and protective forces), Information Security and Material Control and Accountability.

190

Deputy Secretary Decision Affirming Decision as Modified, January 19, 2000  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Daniel Holsinger, Complainant, v. K-Ray Security, Inc., Respondent OHA Case Nos. VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 Daniel Holsinger, Complainant, v. K-Ray Security, Inc., Respondent OHA Case Nos. VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 DECISION AFFIRMING AGENCY DECISION AS MODIFIED Issued: January 19, 2000 This is a request for review by K-Ray Security, Inc., the current security operations contractor at DOE's Federal Energy Technology Center ("FETC"), of the Decision of the Office of Hearings and Appeals ("OHA") on remand from the Deputy Secretary adhering, after an additional evidentiary hearing and an assessment of the equities, to its earlier finding that reinstatement of Complainant Holsinger as a security guard is a necessary and appropriate action to effect full relief, even though it was the prior security contractor, Watkins Security Agency, Inc., ("WSA") that was found to have committed the act of reprisal

191

Facility Software Quality Assurance (SQA) for Captal Project...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Facility Software Quality Assurance (SQA) for Captal Project Critical Decisions RM Facility Software Quality Assurance (SQA) for Captal Project Critical Decisions RM The purpose of...

192

Independent Oversight Assessment, Y-12 National Security Complex- June 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Assessment of Nuclear Safety Culture at the Y-12 National Security Complex Uranium Processing Facility Project

193

Deputy Secretary Decision Remanding VWA-0005 Decision and Order  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DANIEL HOLSINGER, Complainant DANIEL HOLSINGER, Complainant v. K-RAY SECURITY, INC., Respondent. OHA Case No. LWA-0005, LWA-0009 DECISION REVERSING AND REMANDING INITIAL AGENCY DECISION This is a request for review by K-Ray Security, Inc., from the Initial Agency Decision by the Office of Hearings and Appeals ("OHA"), finding that reinstatement of Mr. Holsinger as a security guard is a necessary and appropriate action to effect full relief for a retaliatory termination made by the previous security contractor, Watkins Security Agency, Inc., ("WSA"). Based upon my review of the regulatory language, the relevant case law, and the entire record, I conclude that OHA's decision is incorrect. Mr. Holsinger filed a complaint with the Office of Contractor Employee Protection ("OCEP") on October 7, 1994. R. 103-106. He

194

Corrective Action Decision Document/Corrective Action Plan for the 92-Acre Area and Corrective Action Unit 111: Area 5 WMD Retired Mixed Waste Pits, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Corrective Action Plan (CADD/CAP) has been prepared for the 92-Acre Area, the southeast quadrant of the Radioactive Waste Management Site, located in Area 5 of the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS). The 92-Acre Area includes Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 111, 'Area 5 WMD Retired Mixed Waste Pits.' Data Quality Objectives (DQOs) were developed for the 92-Acre Area, which includes CAU 111. The result of the DQO process was that the 92-Acre Area is sufficiently characterized to provide the input data necessary to evaluate corrective action alternatives (CAAs) without the collection of additional data. The DQOs are included as Appendix A of this document. This CADD/CAP identifies and provides the rationale for the recommended CAA for the 92-Acre Area, provides the plan for implementing the CAA, and details the post-closure plan. When approved, this CADD/CAP will supersede the existing Pit 3 (P03) Closure Plan, which was developed in accordance with Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 265, 'Interim Status Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.' This document will also serve as the Closure Plan and the Post-Closure Plan, which are required by 40 CFR 265, for the 92-Acre Area. After closure activities are complete, a request for the modification of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Permit that governs waste management activities at the NNSS will be submitted to the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection to incorporate the requirements for post-closure monitoring. Four CAAs, ranging from No Further Action to Clean Closure, were evaluated for the 92-Acre Area. The CAAs were evaluated on technical merit focusing on performance, reliability, feasibility, safety, and cost. Based on the evaluation of the data used to develop the conceptual site model; a review of past, current, and future operations at the site; and the detailed and comparative analysis of the potential CAAs, Closure in Place with Administrative Controls is the preferred CAA for the 92-Acre Area. Closure activities will include the following: (1) Constructing an engineered evapotranspiration cover over the 92-Acre Area; (2) Installing use restriction (UR) warning signs, concrete monuments, and subsidence survey monuments; (3) Establishing vegetation on the cover; (4) Implementing a UR; and (5) Implementing post-closure inspections and monitoring. The Closure in Place with Administrative Controls alternative meets all requirements for the technical components evaluated, fulfills all applicable federal and state regulations for closure of the site, and will minimize potential future exposure pathways to the buried waste at the site.

NSTec Environmental Restoration

2010-11-22T23:59:59.000Z

195

Summary of Decisions- February 24, 2014 February 28, 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Application for Exception

196

Summary of Decisions- March 18, 2013- March 22, 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Application for Exception

197

ANNUAL SECURITY & FIRE SAFETY REPORT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ANNUAL SECURITY & FIRE SAFETY REPORT 2014 A guide to policies, procedures, practices, and programs implemented to keep students, faculty, and staff safe and facilities secure. www.montana.edu/reports/security.pdf #12;Inside this Report 2014 Annual Security and Fire Safety Report for Reporting Year 2013

Maxwell, Bruce D.

198

A COMPARISON OF SECURITY SAFEGUARD SELECTION METHODS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

A COMPARISON OF SECURITY SAFEGUARD SELECTION METHODS Thomas Neubauer Secure Business Austria of security safeguards is often a result of current needs or influ- enced by security problems that may go decision makers with an overview of common methods for the evaluation and selection of security safeguards

199

Access control models and security labelling  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Security labels convey information that is utilised to perform access control decisions, specify protective measures, and aid in the determination of additional handling restrictions required by security policies. In discussing security labelling, one ... Keywords: access control, assurance, dynamic labelling model, open system, security label, security policy

Chuchang Liu; Angela Billard; Maris Ozols; Nikifor Jeremic

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

200

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 569: Area 3 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites Nevada National Security Site, Nevada with ROTC 1, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report presents information supporting the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 569: Area 3 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada. CAU 569 comprises the following nine corrective action sites (CASs): 03-23-09, T-3 Contamination Area 03-23-10, T-3A Contamination Area 03-23-11, T-3B Contamination Area 03-23-12, T-3S Contamination Area 03-23-13, T-3T Contamination Area 03-23-14, T-3V Contamination Area 03-23-15, S-3G Contamination Area 03-23-16, S-3H Contamination Area 03-23-21, Pike Contamination Area The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 569 based on the implementation of the corrective actions listed in Table ES-2.

Sloop, Christy

2013-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test Facility | National...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test Facility | National Nuclear Security Administration People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear...

202

Sandia National Laboratories: Infrastructure Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

July 31, 2014, in DETL, Distribution Grid Integration, Energy, Energy Surety, Facilities, Grid Integration, Infrastructure Security, News, News & Events, Photovoltaic, Renewable...

203

Secure Data Center (Fact Sheet)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This fact sheet describes the purpose, lab specifications, applications scenarios, and information on how to partner with NREL's Secure Data Center at the Energy Systems Integration Facility.

Not Available

2012-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

204

Workshop-based Multiobjective Security Safeguard Selection  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Workshop-based Multiobjective Security Safeguard Selection Thomas Neubauer Institute of Software/or are not aware whether their investments are effective. While security safeguards traditionally are evaluated, there is a demand for decision support tools that assist decision makers in allocating security safeguards

205

Worker Safety and Health Enforcement Letter issued to Los Alamos National Security, LLC, related to Worker Beryllium Exposure during Machining at the Los Alamos National Laboratorys Beryllium Technology Facility, May 29, 2013 (WEL-2013-01)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

29, 2013 29, 2013 Dr. Charles F. McMillan, President Los Alamos National Security, LLC Los Alamos National Laboratory Mailstop A 100, Drop Point 03140071S Bikini Atoll Road, TA-3 Los Alamos, New Mexico 87454 WEL-2013-01 Dear Dr. McMillan: The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight evaluated the circumstances surrounding a work evolution performed at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Technical Area 3, Building 141, Beryllium Technology Facility (BTF), on July 11, 2012. The work evolution resulted in a worker exposure to beryllium in excess of the Department of Energy (DOE) action level of 0.2 micrograms per cubic meter for an 8-hour, time-weighted average. Los Alamos National Security, LLC (LANS), which manages and

206

EIS-0343: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Record of Decision EIS-0343: Record of Decision Electrical Interconnection of the COB Energy Facility The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has decided to offer contract terms...

207

EIS-0345: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Record of Decision EIS-0345: Record of Decision Electrical Interconnection of the Plymouth Generating Facility The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has decided to implement...

208

Facility Representative Program: 2007 Facility Representative Workshop  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 Facility Representative Workshop 7 Facility Representative Workshop May 15 - 17, 2007 Las Vegas, NV Facility Rep of the Year Award | Attendees list | Summary Report [PDF] WORKSHOP AGENDA Final Day 1: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 8:00 a.m. Opening Remarks Joanne Lorence, Facility Representative Program Manager 8:15 a.m. Welcome from the Nevada Site Office Gerald Talbot, Manager, Nevada Site Office 8:30 a.m. Videotaped Remarks from the Deputy Secretary The Honorable Clay Sell, Deputy Secretary of Energy 8:45 a.m. Keynote Address - Safety Oversight Perspective and Expectations Glenn Podonsky, Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer, Office of Health, Safety and Security 9:10 a.m. Facility Representative of the Year Presentation Mark B. Whitaker, Jr., Departmental Representative to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board,

209

Facility Representative Program: 2001 Facility Representative Workshop  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 Facility Representative Workshop 1 Facility Representative Workshop May 15 - 17, 2001 Las Vegas, NV Facility Rep of the Year Award | Attendees list | Summary Report [PDF] WORKSHOP AGENDA Day 1: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 Theme: Program Successes and Challenges 8:00 a.m. - Logistics Announcements & Opening Remarks - Joe Arango, Facility Representative Program Manager 8:15 a.m. - Welcome - Debbie Monette, Assistant Manager for National Security, Nevada Operations Office 8:30 a.m. - Keynote Address - Ralph Erickson, National Nuclear Security Administration 9:00 a.m.- DOE Facility Representative of the Year Presentation - Mark B. Whitaker, Jr., Departmental Representative to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 9:30 a.m. - Break 9:50 a.m. - Program Summary - Joe Arango 10:10 a.m. - Management Panel/Questions and Answers

210

Independent Oversight Assessment, Y-12 National Security Complex...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Assessment, Y-12 National Security Complex - June 2012 June 2012 Assessment of Nuclear Safety Culture at the Y-12 National Security Complex Uranium Processing Facility Project...

211

Oversight Reports - Y-12 National Security Complex | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Oversight Assessment, Y-12 National Security Complex - June 2012 Assessment of Nuclear Safety Culture at the Y-12 National Security Complex Uranium Processing Facility Project...

212

National Security | ornl.gov  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Program Areas Program Areas Initiatives Facilities Events and Conferences Supporting Organizations A scientific approach to global security Initiatives | Programs Home | Science & Discovery | National Security National Security | National Security SHARE ORNL plays an important role in national and global security by virtue of its expertise in advanced materials, nuclear science, supercomputing and other scientific specialties. Discovery and innovation in these areas are essential for protecting US citizens and advancing national and global security priorities. ORNL supports these missions by using its signature strengths to meet complex national security challenges in a number of areas. Nuclear Nonproliferation - The laboratory's expertise and experience covers the spectrum of nuclear nonproliferation work, from basic R&D to

213

Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Finding of No Significant Impact for the Proposed Disposition of the Omega West Facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Finding of No Significant Impact for the Proposed Disposition of the Omega West Facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico U. S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Office of Los Alamos Site Operations 528 35th Street Los Alamos, NM 87544 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECUIRTY ADMINISTRATION FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Proposed Disposition of the Omega West Facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Proposed Disposition of the Omega West Facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory [DOE/EA- 74 IO) (attached) provides sufficient evidence and analysis to determine that a Finding Of No Significant Impact is appropriate for the Proposed Action (Complete

214

06 DEC 2013 1 Information Security Guideline  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

responsibilities make informed decisions related to their organization's assets and corresponding security plan the University. 3 Security Plan Intention The executive heads of major University organizations are responsible an Information Security Plan (Plan) that demonstrates due care in securing their assets by meeting the intention

Queitsch, Christine

215

Comparison of two methods to quantify cyber and physical security effectiveness.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

With the increasing reliance on cyber technology to operate and control physical security system components, there is a need for methods to assess and model the interactions between the cyber system and the physical security system to understand the effects of cyber technology on overall security system effectiveness. This paper evaluates two methodologies for their applicability to the combined cyber and physical security problem. The comparison metrics include probabilities of detection (P{sub D}), interruption (P{sub I}), and neutralization (P{sub N}), which contribute to calculating the probability of system effectiveness (P{sub E}), the probability that the system can thwart an adversary attack. P{sub E} is well understood in practical applications of physical security but when the cyber security component is added, system behavior becomes more complex and difficult to model. This paper examines two approaches (Bounding Analysis Approach (BAA) and Expected Value Approach (EVA)) to determine their applicability to the combined physical and cyber security issue. These methods were assessed for a variety of security system characteristics to determine whether reasonable security decisions could be made based on their results. The assessments provided insight on an adversary's behavior depending on what part of the physical security system is cyber-controlled. Analysis showed that the BAA is more suited to facility analyses than the EVA because it has the ability to identify and model an adversary's most desirable attack path.

Wyss, Gregory Dane; Gordon, Kristl A.

2005-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

216

Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

OFFICIAL USE ONLY OFFICIAL USE ONLY Official Use Only (OUO) information is certain unclassified information that may be exempt from public release under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and has the potential to damage governmental, commercial, or private interests if given to persons who do not need to know the information to perform their jobs or other DOE authorized activites. Who can determine what information is OUO? You do! Ask yourself: does the information have the potential to damage governmental, commercial, or private interests if given to persons who do not need the information to perfor their jobs? Does it fall under at least one of the FOIA exemptions? If both answers are yes, then the information is OUO. Freedom of Information Act Exemptions The FOIA generally provides that any information in a document in the Federal Government's possession must be publicly released upon request unless such information falls under one of nine exemptions.

217

Homeland Security Issues for Facilities  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

: Equipment Condition Proper connection of all components Functionality Air filtration Types of filters in use Filter efficiencies Locations of filters Condition of filters Controls Types of controls Energy management system in use.... Filtration Filtration removes unwanted substances from the air. Different types of filters and levels of efficiency offer varying degrees of protection against everyday pollutants and CBR contaminants. Properly chosen, installed, and maintained air...

McClure, J. D.; Fisher, D.; Fenter, T.

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

218

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

October 11, 2012 October 11, 2012 PSH-12-0081 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 11, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance for providing false information on a Questionnaire for National Security Positions and failing to comply with rules regarding the handling of classified information and conduct within simited access areas. This behavior raised security concerns under Criteria F, G, and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer fo October 2, 2012 PSH-12-0052 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 2, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he

219

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 5, 2013 March 5, 2013 PSH-12-0133 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On March 5, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be granted. A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about his misrepresentations and misuse of information technology. The individual's behavior raised security concerns under Criteria F and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual presented sufficient evidence to resolve the security concerns associated March 5, 2013 PSH-12-0131 - In the Matter of: Personnel Security Hearing On March 5, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he

220

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 1, 2012 November 1, 2012 PSH-12-0074 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 1, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about the individual's financial irresponsibility. His behavior raised security concerns under Criterion L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, she found that October 26, 2012 PSH-12-0076 - Personnel Security Hearing On October 26, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Using Common Sense to Effectively Integrate Security Technologies within a School's Security Strategy  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Security technologies are not the answer to all school security problems. However, they can be an excellent tool for school administrators and security personnel when incorporated into a total security strategy involving personnel, procedures, and facility layout. Unfortunately, very few of the tougher security problems in schools have solutions that are affordable, effective, and acceptable. Like any other type of facility, a school's security staff must understand the strengths and limitations of the security measures they are csecurity practices, which will rarely increase new building costs if included in the initial planning.

Gree, M.W.

1998-11-03T23:59:59.000Z

222

Environment/Health/Safety/Security (EHSS): Security and Emergency Services  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Security and Emergency Services Security and Emergency Services SEO Home page collage Documents Organization Chart Related Sites Fire Department Security Services EMERGENCY SERVICES The purpose of Berkeley Lab's Emergency Services is to ensure emergency resources are in maximum readiness, before, during, and after any emergency. ISSM: Integrated Safeguards and Security Management Security Updates MISSION STATEMENT: Provide integrated and efficient life safety, emergency and security services to all employees, guests, and users at the main Berkeley site and off-site facilities. Also, promote continuous improvement of the Lab's scientific and supportive activities. The core competencies of the group are: Emergency response to include fire suppression, emergency medical and hazmat response services

223

R:\DECISION\0060.VBX  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) reviewed both decisions, DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) reviewed both decisions, pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) by which NNSA authorized OHA to adjudicate for NNSA whistleblower complaints brought by employees of NNSA contractors under 10 CFR Part 708. Under the MOU, NNSA is responsible for implementing a final decision issued under Part 708. March 28, 2003 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Supplemental Order Name of Petitioner: Robert Burd Date of Filing: March 13, 2003 Case Number: VBX-0060 On November 16, 2001, BWXT Pantex, as successor to Mason & Hanger Corporation (M&H) (collectively referred to as "the contractor"), filed an appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued by an Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) Hearing Officer under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee

224

Y-12 Removes Nuclear Materials from Two Facilities to Reduce...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Removes Nuclear Materials from Two Facilities to Reduce Site's Nuclear Footprint (Alpha 5 and 9720-38 No Longer Designated as Nuclear Facilities) | National Nuclear Security...

225

Independent Oversight Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex- May 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility Safety Basis Preliminary Safety Design Report Process at the Y-12 National Security Complex

226

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 105: Area 2 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 105 based on the implementation of the corrective actions. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from October 22, 2012, through May 23, 2013, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 105: Area 2 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites; and in accordance with the Soils Activity Quality Assurance Plan, which establishes requirements, technical planning, and general quality practices.

Matthews, Patrick

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

227

Global Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Applications Global Security science-innovationassetsimagesicon-science.jpg Global Security National security depends on science and technology. The United States relies on...

228

Office of Security Operations  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Office of Physical Protection Office of Physical Protection Bill Dwyer Director, 202-586-7887 Mission The mission of the Office of Physical Protection is to implement and oversee dedicated human resources, processes, and equipment designed to protect personnel and assets entrusted to our care at Department of Energy (DOE) Headquarters facilities. The Office is comprised of dedicated DOE Federal security professionals, Headquarters Protective Force personnel, and Alarms and Access Control Technicians. These security subject matter experts work together to ensure compliance with DOE Safeguards and Security regulations, Interagency Security Committee guidance, and federal laws. The result of this collaboration is a security program designed to ensure a safe and secure working environment for all Headquarters employees.

229

Border Security | ornl.gov  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Border Security Border Security SHARE Border Security Testing of unmanned aerial surveillance equipment. ORNL performs border security research at the Security Sciences Field Laboratory (SSFL), which is an indoor/outdoor facility designed to support testing and evaluation of a wide range of intrusion detection, assessment, surveillance, and peripheral physical security equipment including sensors, cameras, power generation, access control, remote communication, unmanned aerial, and activated delay systems. At the heart of SSFL is a simulated border region of varied terrain including open grassy fields, hilly wooded areas, sand pits, and lakes and streams which approximate the actual challenges of border and facility applications. A critical facet of this facility is the ability to test systems year-round under the seasonal

230

Review of July 2013 Nuclear Security Insider Threat Exercise November 2013  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is a review of the Nuclear Security Insider Threat Exercise which was hosted at ORNL in July 2013. Nuclear security culture and the insider threat are best learned through experience. Culture is inherently difficult to teach, and as such is best learned through modeled behaviors and learning exercise. This TTX, NSITE, is a tool that strives to aid students in learning what an effective (and ineffective) nuclear security culture might look like by simulating dynamic events that strengthen or weaken the nuclear security regime. The goals of NSITE are to stimulate complex thought and discussion and assist decision makers and management in determining the most effective policies and procedures for their country or facility.

Pederson, Ann C. [ORNL] [ORNL; Snow, Catherine L. [ORNL] [ORNL; Townsend, Jeremy [ORNL] [ORNL; Shannon, Michael [ORNL] [ORNL

2013-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

231

Decision Summaries  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

oha/decision-summaries Office of Hearings and Appeals oha/decision-summaries Office of Hearings and Appeals 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC, 20585 202-287-1566 en Summary of Decisions - December 30, 2013 - January 3, 2014 http://energy.gov/oha/articles/summary-decisions-december-30-2013-january-3-2014 decisions-december-30-2013-january-3-2014" class="title-link">Summary of Decisions - December 30, 2013 - January 3, 2014

232

Safeguards and Security and Cyber Security RM  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Safeguards and Security and Safeguards and Security and Cyber Security Review Module March 2010 CD- -0 OFFICE O S CD-1 OF ENVIRO Standard Safeguar and Cy Rev Critical D CD-2 M ONMENTA Review Pla rds and S yber Secu view Modul Decision (CD CD March 2010 AL MANAG an (SRP) Security urity le D) Applicabili D-3 GEMENT ity CD-4 Post Ope eration Standard Review Plan, 2 nd Edition, March 2010 i FOREWORD The Standard Review Plan (SRP) 1 provides a consistent, predictable corporate review framework to ensure that issues and risks that could challenge the success of Office of Environmental Management (EM) projects are identified early and addressed proactively. The internal EM project review process encompasses key milestones established by DOE O 413.3A, Change 1, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, DOE-STD-

233

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General report on audit of selected aspects of the unclassified computer security program at a DOE headquarters computing facility  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this audit was to evaluate the effectiveness of the unclassified computer security program at the Germantown Headquarters Administrative Computer Center (Center). The Department of Energy (DOE) relies on the application systems at the Germantown Headquarters Administrative Computer Center to support its financial, payroll and personnel, security, and procurement functions. The review was limited to an evaluation of the administrative, technical, and physical safeguards governing utilization of the unclassified computer system which hosts many of the Department`s major application systems. The audit identified weaknesses in the Center`s computer security program that increased the risk of unauthorized disclosure or loss of sensitive data. Specifically, the authors found that (1) access to sensitive data was not limited to individuals who had a need for the information, and (2) accurate and complete information was not maintained on the inventory of tapes at the Center. Furthermore, the risk of unauthorized disclosure and loss of sensitive data was increased because other controls, such as physical security, had not been adequately implemented at the Center. Management generally agreed with the audit conclusions and recommendations, and initiated a number of actions to improve computer security at the Center.

NONE

1995-07-31T23:59:59.000Z

234

The assess facility descriptor module  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Facility Descriptor (Facility) module is part of the Analytic System and Software for Evaluating Safeguards and Security (ASSESS). Facility is the foundational software application in the ASSESS system for modelling a nuclear facility's safeguards and security system to determine the effectiveness against theft of special nuclear material. The Facility module provides the tools for an analyst to define a complete description of a facility's physical protection system which can then be used by other ASSESS software modules to determine vulnerability to a spectrum of insider and outsider threats. The analyst can enter a comprehensive description of the protection system layout including all secured areas, target locations, and detailed safeguards specifications. An extensive safeguard component catalog provides the reference data for calculating delay and detection performance. Multiple target locations within the same physical area may be specified, and the facility may be defined for two different operational states such as dayshift and nightshift. 6 refs., 5 figs.

Jordan, S.E.; Winblad, A.; Key, B.; Walker, S.; Renis, T.; Saleh, R.

1989-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

235

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 30, 2013 August 30, 2013 PSH-13-0049 - In the Matter of Personnel Security On August 30, 2013, a Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which he determined that an individual's access authorization should not be granted. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not resolved security concerns under Criterion L regarding the Individual's failure to report an arrest for failure to appear at an arraignment concerning traffic tickets and a citation for failing to have a controlled prescription medication in its proper container. August 29, 2013 PSH-13-0057 - In the Matter of Personnel Security On August 28, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security

236

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

14, 2012 14, 2012 PSH-12-0083 - In the Matter of In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 14, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance for failing to comply with rules regarding the handling of classified information and conduct within limited access areas and for failing to report such non-compliance. This behavior raised security concerns under Criteria G and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had presented su November 13, 2012 PSH-12-0092 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On September 24, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he

237

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

October 10, 2013 October 10, 2013 PSH-13-0071 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 10, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. In March 2013, as part of a background investigation, the local security office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address concerns about his alcohol use and alcohol-related incidents. October 10, 2013 PSH-13-0070 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 10, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. Following the individual's employer receiving garnishment notices from both federal and state tax authorities in January 2013, the

238

Corrective Action Decision Document/Corrective Action Plan for Corrective Action Unit 98: Frenchman Flat, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This CADD/CAP follows the Corrective Action Investigation (CAI) stage, which results in development of a set of contaminant boundary forecasts produced from groundwater flow and contaminant transport modeling of the Frenchman Flat CAU. The Frenchman Flat CAU is located in the southeastern portion of the NNSS and comprises 10 underground nuclear tests. The tests were conducted between 1965 and 1971 and resulted in the release of radionuclides in the subsurface in the vicinity of the test cavities. Two important aspects of the corrective action process are presented within this CADD/CAP. The CADD portion describes the results of the Frenchman Flat CAU data-collection and modeling activities completed during the CAI stage. The corrective action objectives and the actions recommended to meet the objectives are also described. The CAP portion describes the corrective action implementation plan. The CAP begins with the presentation of CAU regulatory boundary objectives and initial use restriction boundaries that are identified and negotiated by NNSA/NSO and the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP). The CAP also presents the model evaluation process designed to build confidence that the flow and contaminant transport modeling results can be used for the regulatory decisions required for CAU closure. The first two stages of the strategy have been completed for the Frenchman Flat CAU. A value of information analysis and a CAIP were developed during the CAIP stage. During the CAI stage, a CAIP addendum was developed, and the activities proposed in the CAIP and addendum were completed. These activities included hydrogeologic investigation of the underground testing areas, aquifer testing, isotopic and geochemistry-based investigations, and integrated geophysical investigations. After these investigations, a groundwater flow and contaminant transport model was developed to forecast contaminant boundaries that enclose areas potentially exceeding the Safe Drinking Water Act radiological standards at any time within 1,000 years. An external peer review of the groundwater flow and contaminant transport model was completed, and the model was accepted by NDEP to allow advancement to the CADD/CAP stage. The CADD/CAP stage focuses on model evaluation to ensure that existing models provide adequate guidance for the regulatory decisions regarding monitoring and institutional controls. Data-collection activities are identified and implemented to address key uncertainties in the flow and contaminant transport models. During the CR stage, final use restriction boundaries and CAU regulatory boundaries are negotiated and established; a long-term closure monitoring program is developed and implemented; and the approaches and policies for institutional controls are initiated. The model evaluation process described in this plan consists of an iterative series of five steps designed to build confidence in the site conceptual model and model forecasts. These steps are designed to identify data-collection activities (Step 1), document the data-collection activities in the 0CADD/CAP (Step 2), and perform the activities (Step 3). The new data are then assessed; the model is refined, if necessary; the modeling results are evaluated; and a model evaluation report is prepared (Step 4). The assessments are made by the modeling team and presented to the pre-emptive review committee. The decision is made by the modeling team with the assistance of the pre-emptive review committee and concurrence of NNSA/NSO to continue data and model assessment/refinement, recommend additional data collection, or recommend advancing to the CR stage. A recommendation to advance to the CR stage is based on whether the model is considered to be sufficiently reliable for designing a monitoring system and developing effective institutional controls. The decision to advance to the CR stage or to return to step 1 of the process is then made by NDEP (Step 5).

Irene Farnham and Sam Marutzky

2011-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

239

Procuring Solar for Federal Facilities | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Facilities Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers is a Web guide for federal site managers, site contractors, and procurement specialists to help...

240

Facility Representative Program: 2010 Facility Representative Workshop  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

10 Facility Representative Workshop 10 Facility Representative Workshop May 12 - 13, 2010 Las Vegas, NV Facility Rep of the Year Award | Attendees | Summary Report Workshop Agenda and Presentations Day 1: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 8:00 a.m. Opening Remarks James Heffner, Facility Representative Program Manager Earl Hughes, Safety System Oversight Program Manager Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Office of Health, Safety and Security 8:15 a.m. Welcome from the Nevada Site Office John Mallin, Deputy Assistant Manager for Site Operations Nevada Site Office 8:30 a.m. Workshop Keynote Address Todd Lapointe Chief of Nuclear Safety Central Technical Authority Staff 9:15 a.m. Facility Representative and Safety System Oversight Award Ceremony James Heffner, Facility Representative Program Manager

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Summary of Decisions - December 15, 2014 - December 19, 2014...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

15, 2014 - December 19, 2014 Summary of Decisions - December 15, 2014 - December 19, 2014 December 19, 2014 - 8:35am Addthis Personnel Security Decision (10 CFR Part 710) On...

242

Transportation Decision Support Systems Oak Ridge National Laboratory  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Transportation Decision Support Systems Oak Ridge National Laboratory managed by UT-Battelle, LLC Passenger Flows Supply Chain Efficiency Transportation: Energy Environment Safety Security Vehicle and implementation of automated transportation decision support models for the scheduling and routing of cargo

243

Protective Forces | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

protected fighting positions. Some examples of these improvement are below: Training The Oak Ridge Central Training Facility (CTF), located at NNSA's Y-12 National Security...

244

January 2014 | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Y-12 Press Release Jan 3, 2014 Construction on Pantex High Explosives Pressing Facility Reaches 85% Mark Work on the National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) High...

245

Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site -...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

National Security Site Operational Readiness Review for the Joint Actinide Shock Physics Experimental Research Facility Restart Pre-visit HIAR-NNSS-2011-04-28 This...

246

Weapons production | Y-12 National Security Complex  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Weapons production Weapons production An effective production infrastructure is critical to national security. Y-12 continues to replace World War II-era facilities to increase...

247

Energy Security Planning for Sustainable Buildings  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

For energy security, Federal facility managers have a responsibility to consider a broad array of potential threats and incident scenarios. An underlying process or methodology is essential to...

248

Summary of Decisions- December 17, 2012 December 21, 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Whistleblower Appeal (10 CFR Part 708)

249

EIS-0309: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Record of Decision of the Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Oak Ridge Y-12 National Security Complex, EIS-0309 (March 2002) More Documents &...

250

Summary of Decisions- April 28, 2014 May 2, 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) -Contractor Employee Protection Program (10 CFR Part 708) -Application for Exception

251

Summary of Decisions- March 25, 2013 March 29, 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Whistleblower Appeal (10 CFR Part 708)

252

EIS-0380: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

National Nuclear Security Administration Record of Decision: Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New...

253

National Security, Weapons Science  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

National Security, Weapons Science National Security, Weapons Science /science-innovation/_assets/images/icon-science.jpg National Security, Weapons Science National security depends on science and technology. The United States relies on Los Alamos National Laboratory for the best of both. No place on Earth pursues a broader array of world-class scientific endeavors. Dual-Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test Facility (DARHT) The Dual-Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test Facility at LANL is part of the DOE's stockpile stewardship program. It uses two large X-ray machines to record three-dimensional interior images of materials. In most experiments, materials (including plutonium) undergo hydrodynamic shock to simulate the implosion process in nuclear bombs and/or the effects of severe hydrodynamic stress. The tests are described as "full-scale mockups

254

Waste-to-energy: Decision making and the decisions made  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

During the early 1980s, it was projected that waste-to-energy (WTE) facilities would manage as much as half of all municipal solid waste by the turn of the century. However, during the latter part of the 1980s, the cancellation rate for WTE facilities grew to the point that the portion of the waste stream WTE will handle in the long-term future is less certain. This study, conducted as part of a larger study, identifies factors that influence municipalities, decisions regarding WTE. This study takes a broad perspective about decision-making within communities, emphasizing the context within which decisions were made and the decision-making process. It does not seek to judge the correctness of the decisions.

Schexnayder, S.M. (Tennessee Univ., Knoxville, TN (United States)); Wolfe, A.K. (Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States))

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

255

Waste-to-energy: Decision making and the decisions made  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

During the early 1980s, it was projected that waste-to-energy (WTE) facilities would manage as much as half of all municipal solid waste by the turn of the century. However, during the latter part of the 1980s, the cancellation rate for WTE facilities grew to the point that the portion of the waste stream WTE will handle in the long-term future is less certain. This study, conducted as part of a larger study, identifies factors that influence municipalities, decisions regarding WTE. This study takes a broad perspective about decision-making within communities, emphasizing the context within which decisions were made and the decision-making process. It does not seek to judge the correctness of the decisions.

Schexnayder, S.M. [Tennessee Univ., Knoxville, TN (United States); Wolfe, A.K. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States)

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

256

Optimal Security Liquidation Algorithms Sergiy Butenko  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

using a set of historical sample-paths of prices. 1. Introduction Consider the following decision making positions for several securities. Historical sequences of prices of these securities (after opening. The algorithms provide path-dependent strategies which sell some fractions of security depending upon price

Uryasev, Stanislav

257

Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Independence and Security Act,  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Energy Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements on Delicious

258

Corrective Action Decision Document/Corrective Action Plan for Corrective Action Unit 547: Miscellaneous Contaminated Waste Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this CADD/CAP is to present the corrective action alternatives (CAAs) evaluated for CAU 547, provide justification for selection of the recommended alternative, and describe the plan for implementing the selected alternative. Corrective Action Unit 547 consists of the following three corrective action sites (CASs): (1) CAS 02-37-02, Gas Sampling Assembly; (2) CAS 03-99-19, Gas Sampling Assembly; and(3) CAS 09-99-06, Gas Sampling Assembly. The gas sampling assemblies consist of inactive process piping, equipment, and instrumentation that were left in place after completion of underground safety experiments. The purpose of these safety experiments was to confirm that a nuclear explosion would not occur in the case of an accidental detonation of the high-explosive component of the device. The gas sampling assemblies allowed for the direct sampling of the gases and particulates produced by the safety experiments. Corrective Action Site 02-37-02 is located in Area 2 of the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) and is associated with the Mullet safety experiment conducted in emplacement borehole U2ag on October 17, 1963. Corrective Action Site 03-99-19 is located in Area 3 of the NNSS and is associated with the Tejon safety experiment conducted in emplacement borehole U3cg on May 17, 1963. Corrective Action Site 09-99-06 is located in Area 9 of the NNSS and is associated with the Player safety experiment conducted in emplacement borehole U9cc on August 27, 1964. The CAU 547 CASs were investigated in accordance with the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to determine and implement appropriate corrective actions for CAU 547. Existing radiological survey data and historical knowledge of the CASs were sufficient to meet the DQOs and evaluate CAAs without additional investigation. As a result, further investigation of the CAU 547 CASs was not required. The following CAAs were identified for the gas sampling assemblies: (1) clean closure, (2) closure in place, (3) modified closure in place, (4) no further action (with administrative controls), and (5) no further action. Based on the CAAs evaluation, the recommended corrective action for the three CASs in CAU 547 is closure in place. This corrective action will involve construction of a soil cover on top of the gas sampling assembly components and establishment of use restrictions at each site. The closure in place alternative was selected as the best and most appropriate corrective action for the CASs at CAU 547 based on the following factors: (1) Provides long-term protection of human health and the environment; (2) Minimizes short-term risk to site workers in implementing corrective action; (3) Is easily implemented using existing technology; (4) Complies with regulatory requirements; (5) Fulfills FFACO requirements for site closure; (6) Does not generate transuranic waste requiring offsite disposal; (7) Is consistent with anticipated future land use of the areas (i.e., testing and support activities); and (8) Is consistent with other NNSS site closures where contamination was left in place.

Mark Krauss

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

259

International Nuclear Security  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This presentation discusses: (1) Definitions of international nuclear security; (2) What degree of security do we have now; (3) Limitations of a nuclear security strategy focused on national lock-downs of fissile materials and weapons; (4) What do current trends say about the future; and (5) How can nuclear security be strengthened? Nuclear security can be strengthened by: (1) More accurate baseline inventories; (2) Better physical protection, control and accounting; (3) Effective personnel reliability programs; (4) Minimize weapons-usable materials and consolidate to fewer locations; (5) Consider local threat environment when siting facilities; (6) Implement pledges made in the NSS process; and (7) More robust interdiction, emergency response and special operations capabilities. International cooperation is desirable, but not always possible.

Doyle, James E. [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2012-08-14T23:59:59.000Z

260

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 106: Area 5, 11 Frenchman Flat Atmospheric Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Corrective Action Unit 106 comprises four corrective action sites (CASs): (1) 05-20-02, Evaporation Pond; (2) 05-23-05, Atmospheric Test Site - Able; (3) 05-45-04, 306 GZ Rad Contaminated Area; (4) 05-45-05, 307 GZ Rad Contaminated Area. The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 106 based on the implementation of corrective actions. The corrective action of clean closure was implemented at CASs 05-45-04 and 05-45-05, while no corrective action was necessary at CASs 05-20-02 and 05-23-05. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from October 20, 2010, through June 1, 2011, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 106: Areas 5, 11 Frenchman Flat Atmospheric Sites. The approach for the CAI was divided into two facets: investigation of the primary release of radionuclides, and investigation of other releases (mechanical displacement and chemical releases). The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 106 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on a data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is complete and acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Investigation results were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. A radiological dose FAL of 25 millirem per year was established based on the Industrial Area exposure scenario (2,250 hours of annual exposure). The only radiological dose exceeding the FAL was at CAS 05-45-05 and was associated with potential source material (PSM). It is also assumed that additional PSM in the form of depleted uranium (DU) and DU-contaminated debris at CASs 05-45-04 and 05-45-05 exceed the FAL. Therefore, corrective actions were undertaken at these CASs that consisted of removing PSM and collecting verification samples. Results of verification samples show that remaining soil does not contain contamination exceeding the FALs. Therefore, the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) provides the following recommendations: (1) No further corrective actions are necessary for CAU 106. (2) A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 106. (3) Corrective Action Unit 106 should be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

Patrick Matthews and Dawn Peterson

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Addendum to the Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 113: Area 25 R-MAD Facility, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This addendum to the Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 113: Area 25, Reactor Maintenance, Assembly, and Disassembly Facility, Building 3110, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, DOE/NV--891-VOL I-Rev. 1, dated July 2003, provides details of demolition, waste disposal, and use restriction (UR) modification for Corrective Action Unit 113, Area 25 R-MAD Facility. Demolition was completed on July 15, 2010, when the last of the building debris was disposed. Final field activities were concluded on August 30, 2010, after all equipment was demobilized and UR signs were posted. This work was funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

NSTec Environmental Restoration

2011-02-24T23:59:59.000Z

262

PUREX facility preclosure work plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This preclosure work plan presents a description of the PUREX Facility, the history of the waste managed, and addresses transition phase activities that position the PUREX Facility into a safe and environmentally secure configuration. For purposes of this documentation, the PUREX Facility does not include the PUREX Storage Tunnels (DOE/RL-90/24). Information concerning solid waste management units is discussed in the Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application, General Information Portion (DOE/RL-91-28, Appendix 2D).

Engelmann, R.H.

1997-04-24T23:59:59.000Z

263

Security Rulemaking | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Security Rulemaking Security Rulemaking Transportation Security Rulemaking Activities Security Rulemaking More Documents & Publications Transportation Security Rulemaking...

264

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 23, 2013 January 23, 2013 PSH-12-0121 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. January 17, 2013 PSH-12-0118 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On January 17, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance after the individual had incurred $20,000 in charges while patronizing a "gentleman's club" on a single evening; approximately $17,000 of that amount was charged to his corporate credit card. His

265

Security | Y-12 National Security Complex  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Security Security The Y-12 National Security Complex places the highest priority on maintaining and improving its security posture. We employ security police officers, cyber...

266

Record of Decision (ROD) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Record of Decision (ROD) Record of Decision (ROD) Record of Decision (ROD) A concise public document that records a Federal agency's decision(s) concerning a proposed action for which the agency has prepared an environmental impact statement (See CEQ and DOE NEPA regulations at 40 CFR 1505.2 and 10 CFR 1021.315, respectively). If you have any trouble finding a specific document, please contact AskNEPA@hq.doe.gov for assistance. Documents Available for Download April 12, 1995 EIS-0082: Record of Decision Defense Waste Processing Facility at the Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina February 22, 1995 EIS-0219: Record of Decision Stabilization of Plutonium Solutions Stored in the F- Canyon Facility at the Savannah River Site, Aiken, SC February 22, 1995 EIS-0219: Record of Decision

267

Classification of Threats Via a Multi-sensor Security Portal  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Classification of threats has always been a major security decision ... walks through a security portal. To classify threat by combining data from multiple sensors like ... metal detectors. We wish to identify th...

Amar Singh; Lawrence Holder

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

268

PSH-14-0069- In the Matter of Personnel Security  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On November 12, 2014, an OHA Administrative Judge issued a decision in which she concluded that an individuals security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office conducted a...

269

PSH-14-0045- In the Matter of Personnel Security  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On July 30, 2014, an OHA Administrative Judge issued a decision in which he concluded that an individuals security clearance should be not restored. A Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a...

270

Cyber Security  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Associate CIO for Cyber Security (IM-30) Rod Turk Deputy Associate CIO for Cyber Security (IM-30) Paul Cunningham Incident Management Division (IM-32) Rob Ciochon Director Policy,...

271

Facility Representatives  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

063-2011 063-2011 February 2011 Superseding DOE-STD-1063-2006 April 2006 DOE STANDARD FACILITY REPRESENTATIVES U.S. Department of Energy AREA MGMT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1063-2011 ii Available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web site at http://www.hss.doe.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ DOE-STD-1063-2011 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) standard is approved for use by all DOE/National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Components. 2. The revision to this DOE standard was developed by a working group consisting of headquarters and field participants. Beneficial comments (recommendations,

272

Facility stabilization project, fiscal year 1998 -- Multi-year workplan (MYWP) for WBS 1.4  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The primary Facility Stabilization mission is to provide minimum safe surveillance and maintenance of facilities and deactivate facilities on the Hanford Site, to reduce risks to workers, the public and environment, transition the facilities to a low cost, long term surveillance and maintenance state, and to provide safe and secure storage of special nuclear materials, nuclear materials, and nuclear fuel. Facility Stabilization will protect the health and safety of the public and workers, protect the environment and provide beneficial use of the facilities and other resources. Work will be in accordance with the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (Tri-Party Agreement), local, national, international and other agreements, and in compliance with all applicable Federal, state, and local laws. The stakeholders will be active participants in the decision processes including establishing priorities, and in developing a consistent set of rules, regulations, and laws. The work will be leveraged with a view of providing positive, lasting economic impact in the region. Effectiveness, efficiency, and discipline in all mission activities will enable Hanford Site to achieve its mission in a continuous and substantive manner. As the mission for Facility Stabilization has shifted from production to support of environmental restoration, each facility is making a transition to support the Site mission. The mission goals include the following: (1) Achieve deactivation of facilities for transfer to EM-40, using Plutonium Uranium Extraction (PUREX) plant deactivation as a model for future facility deactivation; (2) Manage nuclear materials in a safe and secure condition and where appropriate, in accordance with International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards rules; (3) Treat nuclear materials as necessary, and store onsite in long-term interim safe storage awaiting a final disposition decision by US Department of Energy; (4) Implement nuclear materials disposition directives. In the near term these are anticipated to mostly involve transferring uranium to other locations for beneficial use. Work will be in accordance with the Tri-Party Agreement, and other agreements and in compliance with all applicable Federal, state and local laws. The transition to deactivation will be accomplished through a phased approach, while maintaining the facilities in a safe and compliant configuration. In addition, Facility Stabilization will continue to maintain safe long-term storage facilities for Special Nuclear Material (SNM), Nuclear Material (NM), and Nuclear Fuel (NF). The FSP deactivation strategy aligns with the deactivate facilities mission outlined in Hanford Site SE documentation. Inherent to the FSP strategies are specific Hanford Strategic Plan success indicators such as: reduction of risks to workers, the public and environment; increasing the amount of resources recovered for other uses; reduction/elimination of inventory and materials; and reduction/elimination of costly mortgages.

Floberg, W.C.

1997-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

273

Summary of Decisions - May 19, 2014 - May 23, 2014 | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

not resolved security concerns regarding the individual's rule violations in bringing a cell phone into an unauthorized area and conducting gambling pools at a DOE facility....

274

Requirements for security signalling  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

There has been some interest lately in the need for ``authenticated signalling``, and the development of signalling specifications by the ATM Forum that support this need. The purpose of this contribution is to show that if authenticated signalling is required, then supporting signalling facilities for directory services (i.e. key management) are also required. Furthermore, this contribution identifies other security related mechanisms that may also benefit from ATM-level signalling accommodations. For each of these mechanisms outlined here, an overview of the signalling issues and a rough cut at the required fields for supporting Information Elements are provided. Finally, since each of these security mechanisms are specified by a number of different standards, issues pertaining to the selection of a particular security mechanism at connection setup time (i.e. specification of a required ``Security Quality of Service``) are also discussed.

Pierson, L.G.; Tarman, T.D.

1995-02-05T23:59:59.000Z

275

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 13, 2013 June 13, 2013 PSH-13-0034 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On June 13, 2013, a Hearing Officer determined that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not successfully addressed the DOE's security concerns regarding her finances under criterion (l). June 11, 2013 PSH-13-0019 - In the Matter of Personnel Security On June 11, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's authorization access should be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance following the individual contemplating suicide and, subsequently, being diagnosed by a DOE consulting psychologist as meeting the criteria for

276

RCRA Permit for a Hazardous Waste Management Facility Permit Number NEV HW0101 Annual Summary/Waste Minimization Report Calendar Year 2012, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) identification number of each generator from which the Permittee received a waste stream, a description and quantity of each waste stream in tons and cubic feet received at the facility, the method of treatment, storage, and/or disposal for each waste stream, a description of the waste minimization efforts undertaken, a description of the changes in volume and toxicity of waste actually received, any unusual occurrences, and the results of tank integrity assessments. This Annual Summary/Waste Minimization Report is prepared in accordance with Section 2.13.3 of Permit Number NEV HW0101, issued 10/17/10.

,

2013-02-21T23:59:59.000Z

277

Office of Safeguards, Security & Emergency Preparedness | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of Safeguards, Security & Office of Safeguards, Security & Emergency Preparedness Office of Safeguards, Security & Emergency Preparedness Office of Safeguards, Security & Emergency Preparedness Mission Develop and oversee the implementation of policy and guidance with respect to security and emergency management. Foster continuous improvement across the Environmental Management (EM) complex through application of Integrated Safeguards and Security Management principles. Serve as a liaison with sites and other agencies on security and emergency management issues. Major Responsibilities Ensure the mandatory level of safeguards and security protection, with managed risk, for EM's nuclear materials, facilities, classified material, documents and other government assets. Apply the Graded Security Protection (GSP) Policy and other

278

Big Explosives Experimental Facility - BEEF  

ScienceCinema (OSTI)

The Big Explosives Experimental Facility or BEEF is a ten acre fenced high explosive testing facility that provides data to support stockpile stewardship and other national security programs. At BEEF conventional high explosives experiments are safely conducted providing sophisticated diagnostics such as high speed optics and x-ray radiography.

None

2015-01-07T23:59:59.000Z

279

Big Explosives Experimental Facility - BEEF  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Big Explosives Experimental Facility or BEEF is a ten acre fenced high explosive testing facility that provides data to support stockpile stewardship and other national security programs. At BEEF conventional high explosives experiments are safely conducted providing sophisticated diagnostics such as high speed optics and x-ray radiography.

None

2014-10-31T23:59:59.000Z

280

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 31, 2013 July 31, 2013 PSH-13-0033 - In the Matter of Personnel Security On July 31, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that a security clearance should not be granted to an individual. The individual disclosed during his background investigation that in 2005-06 he had been charged for battery as a result of a dispute with a neighbor, domestic violence as a result of an altercation with his then-wife, and driving under the influence of alcohol. Beginning in 2007, the individual had separately attended court-mandated domestic violence counseling and alcohol treatment programs. July 26, 2013 PSH-13-0044 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 26 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Argonne's National Security Information Systems National  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

National Security National Security Information Systems National Security The NSIS team has worked with various government agencies and programs over the past 15 years to create customized technological solutions that meet specific needs, while also fulfilling national security objectives, improving efficiency and reducing costs. Applying a broad range of expertise and experience, the Argonne team develops both unclassified and classified information technology (IT) systems for national security and nonproliferation programs, with a focus on security operations, international treaty implementation, export control and law enforcement support. Some examples of NSIS-developed systems include:  Electronic Facility Clearance (e-FCL) System for the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD)

282

Integrated safeguards and security management plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Berkeley Lab is committed to scientific excellence and stewardship of its assets. While security principles apply to all work performed at the Laboratory, their implementation is flexible. Berkeley Lab adheres to the following principles: Line management owns security; Security roles and responsibilities are clearly defined and communicated; Security functions are integrated; An open environment supports the Laboratory's Mission; The security program must support the scientific and operational missions of the Laboratory and must be value added; and Security controls are tailored to individual and facility requirements.

Bowen, Sue, editor

2001-04-16T23:59:59.000Z

283

Interactive Montages of Sprites for Indexing and Summarizing Security Video  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

facilities (e.g. a nuclear power plant) or exterior home security video from a residential neighborhood. WeInteractive Montages of Sprites for Indexing and Summarizing Security Video Chris Pal University for indexing and visualizing video in the context of security applications. We wish to index security video

Pal, Chris

284

Department of Energy Announces Decision to Consolidate Surplus...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Issues Amended Decision to Expand Use of Nuclear Facility Top: MOX Services President Kelly Trice, left, presents a certificate to Wise President and Owner David Abney and Wise...

285

EIS-0236: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

nuclear weapons stockpile. DOEEIS-0236, Record of Decision for the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the National Ignition Facility, 66 FR 18078 (April...

286

Information Security: Coordination of Federal Cyber Security...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Security: Coordination of Federal Cyber Security Research and Development Information Security: Coordination of Federal Cyber Security Research and Development GAO recommends that...

287

Federal Facility Reporting | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Facility Reporting Federal Facility Reporting Federal Facility Reporting October 8, 2013 - 1:59pm Addthis Various legal authorities require agencies to report data on energy and water consumption and resource management efforts within Federal facilities. The Federal Energy Management Program collects this data to assess agency performance toward mandated goals on agency Energy/Sustainability Scorecards and presents it in annual reports to Congress. Find Federal facility reporting information related to: Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007, Section 432, Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements: View information about requirements and data collected to track Federal facility compliance with requirements for performing facility evaluations, implementing and

288

Oversight Reports - Y-12 National Security Complex | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Y-12 National Security Complex Y-12 National Security Complex Oversight Reports - Y-12 National Security Complex Independent Oversight Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex - May 2013 Appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility Safety Basis Preliminary Safety Design Report Process at the Y-12 National Security Complex Independent Activity Report, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Public Meeting - October 2012 Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Public Meeting on the Status of Integration of Safety Into the Design of the Uranium Processing Facility [HIAR-Y-12-2012-10-02] Independent Oversight Assessment, Y-12 National Security Complex - June 2012 Assessment of Nuclear Safety Culture at the Y-12 National Security Complex Uranium Processing Facility Project Independent Oversight Review, Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC

289

Nevada National Security Site | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Nevada National Security Site Nevada National Security Site Nevada National Security Site Crews perform demolition of the R-MAD facility. R-MAD is one of several Nevada National Security Site facilities which supported the nuclear rocket program that ended in 1973 Crews perform demolition of the R-MAD facility. R-MAD is one of several Nevada National Security Site facilities which supported the nuclear rocket program that ended in 1973 Waste management specialists disposed approximately 1.8 million cubic feet of low-level and mixed low-level radioactive waste at the Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site, which amounts to 2,558 shipments and 13,173 packages of waste. These volumes constitute approximately 5 percent of the low-level and mixed low-level waste generated throughout DOE complex. This photo shows Area 5 waste disposal operations

290

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 20, 2012 June 20, 2012 PSH-12-0044 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is a contractor employee at a DOE facility and has possessed a security clearance on various occasions since 1978. Exhibit (Ex.) 8 at 2. In December 2011, the Individual reported to the Local Security Office (LSO) that his wages were being garnished for back federal taxes. Ex. 13 at 1. Consequently, the LSO conducted a personnel security interview (PSI) with the Individual in January 2012. Ex. 15. June 13, 2012 PSH-12-0010 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual works for a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor and is an applicant for DOE access authorization. In August 2010, the individual completed a Questionnaire for National Security Positions (QNSP) and was

291

Decision Theory and Real Decisions:  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Decision theory has been extremely successful in various ways. As a theory per se..., it has provided interesting research opportunities stemming from an elegant central core. It has served as a basis for identif...

Kenneth R. MacCrimmon

1999-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

292

Facility Centered Assessment of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Science and Technology Operations - Facility Operations Director Managed Facilities, August 2011  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Review Report Review Report Facility Centered Assessment of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Science and Technology Operations - Facility Operations Director Managed Facilities May 2011 August 2011 Office of Health, Safety and Security Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Table of Contents Background ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Results ........................................................................................................................................................... 2 Conduct of the FCA ......................................................................................................................... 2

293

Facility Centered Assessment of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Science and Technology Operations - Facility Operations Director Managed Facilities, August 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Review Report Review Report Facility Centered Assessment of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Science and Technology Operations - Facility Operations Director Managed Facilities May 2011 August 2011 Office of Health, Safety and Security Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Table of Contents Background ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Results ........................................................................................................................................................... 2 Conduct of the FCA ......................................................................................................................... 2

294

EIS-0387: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Record of Decision Record of Decision EIS-0387: Record of Decision Y-12 National Security Complex The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is issuing this Record of Decision (ROD) for the Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee based on information and analyses contained in the Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Y-12 National Security Complex, DOE/EIS-0387 (Y-12 Final SWEIS, Y-12 SWEIS or 2011 Y- 12 SWEIS) issued on March 4, 2011; comments on the Draft and Final Y-12 SWEIS; and other factors, including costs, security considerations and the missions of NNSA. EIS-0387_ROD_2011.pdf More Documents & Publications EA-0387: DOE Notice of Availability of the Final Site-Wide Environmental

295

Security systems engineering overview  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Crime prevention is on the minds of most people today. The concern for public safety and the theft of valuable assets are being discussed at all levels of government and throughout the public sector. There is a growing demand for security systems that can adequately safeguard people and valuable assets against the sophistication of those criminals or adversaries who pose a threat. The crime in this country has been estimated at $70 billion in direct costs and up to $300 billion in indirect costs. Health insurance fraud alone is estimated to cost American businesses $100 billion. Theft, warranty fraud, and counterfeiting of computer hardware totaled $3 billion in 1994. A threat analysis is a prerequisite to any security system design to assess the vulnerabilities with respect to the anticipated threat. Having established a comprehensive definition of the threat, crime prevention, detection, and threat assessment technologies can be used to address these criminal activities. This talk will outline the process used to design a security system regardless of the level of security. This methodology has been applied to many applications including: government high security facilities; residential and commercial intrusion detection and assessment; anti-counterfeiting/fraud detection technologies (counterfeit currency, cellular phone billing, credit card fraud, health care fraud, passport, green cards, and questionable documents); industrial espionage detection and prevention (intellectual property, computer chips, etc.); and security barrier technology (creation of delay such as gates, vaults, etc.).

Steele, B.J.

1996-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

296

Security Cases  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

security-cases Office of Hearings and Appeals 1000 security-cases Office of Hearings and Appeals 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC, 20585 202-287-1566 en PSH-13-0103 - In the Matter of Personnel Security http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/psh-13-0103-matter-personnel-security security" class="title-link">PSH-13-0103 - In the Matter of Personnel Security

297

Infrastructure Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. SAND2013-7809W to enhance the nation's security and prosperity...

298

DECISION AND ORDER  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

, 2004 , 2004 DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Decision of the Director Name of Petitioner: Charles L. Evans Date of Filing: May 17, 2004 Case Number: TBU-0026 Charles Evans, a former employee of Fluor Hanford Inc. (Fluor), a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor, appeals the DOE Richland Operations Office=s (Richland) dismissal of the whistleblower complaint he filed against Fluor under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program. I. BACKGROUND A. The DOE=s Contractor Employee Protection Program The DOE=s Contractor Employee Protection Program was established to safeguard Apublic and employee health and safety; ensur[e] compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations; and prevent[] fraud, mismanagement, waste and abuse@ at DOE=s government-owned, contractor-operated facilities. 57 Fed. Reg.

299

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

April 19, 2013 April 19, 2013 PSH-13-0006 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing DOE should not grant an individual access authorization. As security concerns under 10 CFR Part 710, a Local Security Office (LSO) cited the individual's history of criminal conduct, financial problems, and past use of alcohol habitually to excess. The LSO also cited the report of a DOE Psychologist, in which he identified the individual's lack of control over his spending and use of alcohol as a mental condition that causes a significant defect in his judgment and reliability. April 17, 2013 PSH-12-0143 - In the Matter of Personnel Security On April 17, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should not restore an individual's access authorization. As security concerns under Criteria H, J, and L of 10 CFR

300

Analysis of park-and-ride decision behavior based on Decision Field Theory  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Park and ride is a kind of traffic management solution to the traffic congestion problem in urban cities. This paper analyzes the decision making behavior of Park and Ride from a psychological point of view. Decision Field Theory is used to establish the decision model of Park and Ride. The proposed decision model is calibrated using real-life experimental survey data and has proved to be able to account for the complex decision behavior processes observed in the experimental survey data. The model demonstrates the psychological decision processes of individual travelers and the decision characteristics, such as simple decision, indecision and preference reversal. The effects of factors, e.g. deliberation time, deliberation threshold and initial preference, for mode choice are also examined. The proposed model demonstrates its capability of analyzing park-and-ride decision behavior and providing policy makers with useful information for future promotion and planning for park-and-ride facilities.

Huanmei Qin; Hongzhi Guan; Yao-Jan Wu

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Secretary Bodman Makes "Energizing America for Energy Security...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

security." The new manufacturing center will be the second facility operated by United Solar Ovionic. Its current 25-megawatt module manufacturing plant is not only the largest...

302

Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site- July 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review of Nevada National Security Site Device Assembly Facility Justification for Continued Operations for Inoperable HEPA-Filtered Ventilation System [HIAR-NNSS-2011-07-08

303

COLLOQUIUM: NIF An Unexpected Journey or Lessons Learned to Secure...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

to secure any future large scale facility. The presentation will include a historical perspective on the ICF and Stockpile Stewardship program that motivated NIF and the...

304

2015 DOE Safety and Security Enforcement Workshop | Department...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Workshop 2015 DOE Safety and Security Enforcement Workshop WHEN: May 5 and 6, 2015 (EFCOG Meeting on May 7) WHERE: Nevada Support Facility Nevada Field Office REGISTRATION FEE:...

305

Special Report Order, Los Alamos National Security, LLC - January...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

to Los Alamos National Security, LLC related to Glovebox Activities at TA-55 and Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facilities at the Los Alamos National Laboratory On January...

306

Implementing Motor Decision Plans  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Implementing Motor Decision Plans R. Neal Elliott, Ph.D., P.E., Senior Associate American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE), Washington, DC Abstract The first step to reducing energy costs and increasing reliability in motors... is chosen with limited regard to the short or long-tenn cost. This paper discusses how to develop a plan appropriate to the needs of a particular facility. Introduction In most cases, the opportunity to install a more efficient motor isO available...

Elliott, R. N.

307

Security-by-design handbook.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is a draft SecuritybyDesign (SeBD) handbook produced to support the Work Plan of the Nuclear Security Summit to share best practices for nuclear security in new facility design. The Work Plan calls on States to %E2%80%9Cencourage nuclear operators and architect/engineering firms to take into account and incorporate, where appropriate, effective measures of physical protection and security culture into the planning, construction, and operation of civilian nuclear facilities and provide technical assistance, upon request, to other States in doing so.%E2%80%9D The materials for this document were generated primarily as part of a bilateral project to produce a SeBD handbook as a collaboration between the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) Nuclear Nonproliferation Science and Technology Center and Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), which represented the US Department Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) under a Project Action Sheet PASPP04. Input was also derived based on tours of the Savannah River Site (SRS) and Japan Nuclear Fuel Limited (JNFL) Rokkasho Mixed Oxide Fuel fabrication facilities and associated project lessonslearned. For the purposes of the handbook, SeBD will be described as the systemlevel incorporation of the physical protection system (PPS) into a new nuclear power plant or nuclear facility resulting in a PPS design that minimizes the risk of malicious acts leading to nuclear material theft; nuclear material sabotage; and facility sabotage as much as possible through features inherent in (or intrinsic to) the design of the facility. A fourelement strategy is presented to achieve a robust, durable, and responsive security system.

Snell, Mark Kamerer; Jaeger, Calvin Dell; Scharmer, Carol; Jordan, Sabina Erteza; Tanuma, Koji [Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai-mura, Ibaraki, Japan; Ochiai, Kazuya [Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai-mura, Ibaraki, Japan; Iida, Toru [Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai-mura, Ibaraki, Japan

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

308

U.S. HEU Disposition Program | National Nuclear Security Administratio...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

several DOE facilities, but primarily at NNSA's Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12) in Oak Ridge, Tenn. When ready for down-blending, it is shipped to a private sector facility...

309

VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel Holsinger, Complainant, v. K-Ray Security, Inc. VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In...

310

UNIT NAME: C-751 Fuel Facility REGULATORY STATUS: AOC  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

,93 186 UNIT NUMBER : UNIT NAME: C-751 Fuel Facility REGULATORY STATUS: AOC LOCATION: Inside plant security fence, immediately south of C-720 building. APPROXIMATE DIMENSION: Two...

311

Sandia completes major overhaul of key nuclear weapons test facilities...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

completes major overhaul of key nuclear weapons test facilities | National Nuclear Security Administration People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering...

312

Y-12 demos former utilities and maintenance facility | National...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

demos former utilities and maintenance facility | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing...

313

Bicycle Commuting web.mit.edu/facilities/transportation/bicycling  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Bicycle Commuting web.mit.edu/facilities/transportation/bicycling Cyclist mailing list: mitbike@mit.edu Employee Commuter Benefit Bicycle Registration Campus Bike Map Secure Bike Parking Carpooling

Polz, Martin

314

Cyber Security | National Security | ORNL  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

National Security Home | Science & Discovery | National Security | Initiatives | Cyber Security SHARE Cyber Security Through Science A Science-Based Approach image ORNL uses a science-based approach that combines experimentation, theory, modeling, and high performance computing to solve some of the nation's cyber security grand challenges. Significant, 'game-changing' transformation requires a science-based approach that combines fundamental understanding with experimentation, theory, and modeling. The most successful scientific programs use peer review to maximize intellectual capital and prioritize research needs. The Department of Energy has applied this approach through programs such as the Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) and ASCI,

315

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 1, 2013 November 1, 2013 PSH-13-0092 - In the Matter of Personnel Security On November 1, 2013, a Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which he determined that an individual's access authorization should not be restored. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not resolved security concerns regarding the Criterion L concerns arising from his lengthy history of financial irresponsibility and his failure to timely comply with an information request regarding his financial status. October 29, 2013 PSH-13-0086 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 29, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should be restored. The Record showed that the individual had two DUIs and that a

316

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

29, 2012 29, 2012 PSH-12-0097 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 29, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be restored. The Individual had been charged with committing a sexual battery. Although the Individual had testified that a jury had acquitted him of this charge, the Individual did not provide any documentation that he had been acquitted. Nor had the Individual presented sufficient evidence to resolve the concerns raised by his conduct. The Individual had also intentionally provided misleading information during a personnel security interview. November 29, 2012 PSH-12-0080 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On November 29, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she

317

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9, 2013 9, 2013 PSH-13-0052 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 9, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should be restored. A DOE Psychiatrist had found that the individual suffered from alcohol abuse. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual mitigated these security concerns at the hearing by presenting evidence that he had more than fully complied with the DOE Psychiatrist's treatment recommendations and the treatment has been effective. Steven Fine - Hearing Officer July 3, 2013 PSH-13-0048 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On July 3, 2013, a Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which he determined that an individual's access authorization should be restored. In reaching

318

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 23, 2013 May 23, 2013 PSH-13-0018 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On May 23, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual's DOE access authorization should not be granted. The Individual had a history of six arrests, five of which were alcohol-related and two of which were marijuana-related. In addition, A DOE Psychologist diagnosed the individual with Alcohol Dependence. The Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not mitigated any the security concerns raised by his alcohol abuse and history of criminal conduct at the hearing, because he was only in the early stages of his recovery from his alcohol d May 22, 2013 PSH-13-0022 - In the Matter of Personnel Security On May 22, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he

319

Meeting Federal Energy Security Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Markel Markel SRA International Lawrence_Markel@sra.com Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Fall 2012 - October 16-17 Mobile, AL Sponsored by Alabama Power Theme Meeting energy security requirements in federal facilities provides opportunities for additional types of cooperation between utilities and the federal agencies. However, there are significant barriers to pursuing these opportunities - constraints on utilities and on federal agencies, as well as sometimes-competing objectives. Energy security encompasses sufficiency, surety, and sustainability.  Above all, energy security means having adequate power to conduct critical operations for the duration required (sufficiency).  Secondarily, and leading to sufficiency, is ensuring resilient energy supplies that are accessible when

320

ARM - Facility News Article  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

December 15, 2007 [Facility News] December 15, 2007 [Facility News] Radar Antenna Replacement Effort Begins at Barrow Bookmark and Share On November 28, 2007, ARM operations and engineering staff braved -15°F weather to install the new radar antenna at Barrow. After lifting the antenna via crane onto the roof of the skydeck, the gloves had to come off to securely fasten all the tiny connecting screws and bolts-brrrrr! On November 28, 2007, ARM operations and engineering staff braved -15°F weather to install the new radar antenna at Barrow. After lifting the antenna via crane onto the roof of the skydeck, the gloves had to come off to securely fasten all the tiny connecting screws and bolts-brrrrr! For estimates of cloud boundaries, there is no better capability than the millimeter wave cloud radar (MMCR). This sophisticated radar is part of the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Record of Decision (ROD) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 18, 2011 August 18, 2011 EIS-0240: Amended Record of Decision Disposition of Surplus Highly Enriched Uranium July 20, 2011 EIS-0387: Record of Decision Y-12 National Security Complex July 8, 2011 EIS-0380: Amended Record of Decision Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico April 18, 2011 EIS-0416: Record of Decision Issuance of Loan Guarantees to Solar Partners I, LLC, Solar Partners II, LLC, and Solar Partners VIII, LLC, for Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System Units 1, 2, 3 March 11, 2011 EIS-0422: Record of Decision Bonneville Power Administration's Central Ferry-Lower Monumental 500-kilovolt Transmission Line Project January 12, 2011 EIS-0407: Record of Decision Abengoa Biorefinery Project Near Hugoton, Stevens County, Kansas November 29, 2010

322

Office of Secure Transportation Activities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

16th, 2012 16th, 2012 WIPP Knoxville, TN OFFICE OF SECURE TRANSPORTATION Agency Integration Briefing Our Mission To provide safe and secure ground and air transportation of nuclear weapons, nuclear weapons components, and special nuclear materials and conduct other missions supporting the national security of the United States of America. 3 5 OST's Commitment to Transportation Safety and Security Over three decades of safe, secure transport of nuclear weapons and special nuclear material to and from military locations and DOE facilities More than 140 million miles traveled Over three decades and 240,000 flight hours of accident-free flying Professionalism We conduct ourselves and our operations with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.

323

Chapter_1_Physical_Security  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Physical Security Physical Security This chapter describes the security procedures adopted by DOE HQ to implement the requirements of the following DOE directives: * Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 860.4 * Title 41 CFR Parts 101-19.3 and 102.74, Subpart C * Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD)-12, Policy for a Common Identification Standard for Federal Employees and Contractors * DOE Order 473.3, Protection Program Operations * DOE Order 471.6, Information Security * DOE Order 580.1, Change 1, DOE Personal Property Management Program The objective of these directives is to protect DOE sensitive and classified information, facilities, property, and employees from threats posed by intelligence collectors, terrorists, violent activists,

324

Y-12 National Security Complex - Reports  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Reports Reports Y-12 National Security Complex Review Reports 2013 Independent Oversight Appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility Safety Basis Preliminary Safety Design Report Process at the Y-12 National Security Complex, May 2013 Review Reports 2012 Review of the Long Lead Procurement Processed Used by Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC for the Uranium Processing Facility Project, July 2012 Assessment of Nuclear Safety Culture at the Y-12 National Security Complex Uranium Processing Facility Project, June 2012 Review of the Y-12 Implementation Verification Review Processes, June 2012 Targeted Review of Site Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Y-12 National Security Complex, February 2012 Office of Nuclear Safety Enforcement Regulatory Assistance Review of B&W Technical Services Y-12, LLC at the Y-12 National Security Complex, January 20, 2012

325

LANSCE | Facilities  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Isotope Production Facility (IPF) Lujan Neutron Scattering Center Materials Test Station (MTS) Proton Radiography (pRad) Ultracold Neutrons (UCN) Weapons Neutron Research Facility...

326

Department of Energy Security Condition (SECON) | Department...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

facilities, sites and locations. SECON Level descriptions per DOE O 470.4B, Safeguards and Security Program, are linked to the SECON level displayed on the EHSS homepage....

327

Safety, security and safeguard  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract A physical protection system (PPS) integrates people, procedures, and equipment for the protection of assets or facilities against theft, sabotage and terrorist attacks. Therefore, this paper proposes the use of a systematic and measurable approach to the design of PPS and its emphases on the concept of detection, delay and response. The proposed performance based PPS has the capability of defeating adversaries thereby achieving its targets. Therefore, timely detection of intrusion based on the use of sensors, signal lines and alarm systems is a major principle in the proposed system. Also the need for deterrence such as barriers in form of guards, access control, close circuit television (CCTV), strong policy and procedures, then the security culture amongst the facility workers was appropriately discussed. Since nuclear power is considered the only source that can provide large scale electricity with comparatively minimal impact on the environment, the paper also considered base guidelines for the application of PPS in any nuclear and radioactive facilities, followed with the necessity to incorporate inherent safety, security and safeguard (3S) synergy innovation in the physical protection system design and other characteristics that will enhance to reduce the vulnerability of nuclear facilities and materials to theft sabotage and terrorist attacks.

Nasiru Imam Zakariya; M.T.E. Kahn

2015-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

328

Heuristics and Biases: Implications for Security Vaibhav Garg  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

based in expected utility have been conducted for both security and privacy risks. These have provided, we examine how these heuristics and/or biases can enable better decisions on- line. We expand Normative Decision Frames Expected utility theory implies an algorithmic approach to decision

Camp, L. Jean

329

EIS-0228: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

28: Record of Decision 28: Record of Decision EIS-0228: Record of Decision Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test Facility The Department of Energy (DOE) is issuing this Record of Decision (ROD) regarding the DOE's proposed Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test (DARHT) facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in northern New Mexico. DOE has decided to complete and operate the DARHT facility at LANL while implementing a program to conduct most tests inside steel containment vessels, with containment to be phased in over ten years. DOE/EIS-0228, Record of Decision Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test Facility, 60 FR 53588 (October 1995) More Documents & Publications EIS-0183: Record of Decision EIS-0380: Mitigation Action Plan Annual Report Audit Report: IG-0599

330

EIS-0228: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8: Record of Decision 8: Record of Decision EIS-0228: Record of Decision Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test Facility The Department of Energy (DOE) is issuing this Record of Decision (ROD) regarding the DOE's proposed Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test (DARHT) facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in northern New Mexico. DOE has decided to complete and operate the DARHT facility at LANL while implementing a program to conduct most tests inside steel containment vessels, with containment to be phased in over ten years. DOE/EIS-0228, Record of Decision Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test Facility, 60 FR 53588 (October 1995) More Documents & Publications EIS-0183: Record of Decision EIS-0380: Mitigation Action Plan Annual Report Audit Report: IG-0699

331

Safety, Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Safety, Security Safety, Security Safety, Security LANL's mission is to develop and apply science and technology to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. nuclear deterrent; reduce global threats; and solve other emerging national security and energy challenges. Contact Operator Los Alamos National Laboratory (505) 667-5061 We do not compromise safety for personal, programmatic, or operational reasons. Safety: we integrate safety, security, and environmental concerns into every step of our work Our commitments We conduct our work safely and responsibly to achieve our mission. We ensure a safe and healthful environment for workers, contractors, visitors, and other on-site personnel. We protect the health, safety, and welfare of the general public. We do not compromise safety for personal, programmatic, or

332

Addendum to the Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 372: Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document constitutes an addendum to the Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 372: Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (Revision 0), April 2011.

Patrick Matthews and Christy Sloop

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

333

The KONVERGENCE Model for Sustainable Decisions  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The KONVERGENCE Model for Sustainable Decisions is a new way of viewing, developing, organizing, and evaluating alternatives for decisions that may affect a wide range of interests and that must factor in long timeframes, enduring hazards, and/or continuing responsibilities. It differs from other models in that it addresses the need for decisions to continue to "work" over long time periods in an ever-changing decision environment. The authors show that the model contains three major universes - knowledge, values, and resources (the K, V, and R in KONVERGENCE)- that interact and overlap throughout the effective lifetime of a decision. They discuss how decision-makers and decision participants can use the model to craft and analyze decisions and decision processes that stand the test of time. The authors use the U.S. moon-landing program as an example of a major decision process that was sustained over time. They use the model to explain why events unfolded in the way that they did - and why we are where we are today in that program. The authors believe that this model will be especially useful in long-term decision processes such as those that address contamination cleanup programs, long-term environmental stewardship, and the initial siting of facilities with long-term objectives. Companion papers describe the KONVERGENCE Model process steps and implications for intractable cleanup decisions.

Kerr, Thomas A; Dakins, Maxine; Gibson, Patrick Lavern; Joe, Jeffrey Clark; Nitschke, Robert Leon; Piet, Steven James

2002-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

334

Enhancing management decision making in global enterprises using GIS principles  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Business organisations are increasing their influence and presence throughout the world as domestic economies become oversaturated. Organisations increasingly turn to international commerce to discover new markets. Globalisation requires that firms adapt their management and decision-making practices to recognise localised cultural, political, legal, social, and security requirements. In response, organisations are revamping their decision processes, tailoring them as cultures evolve, political assumptions and realities change, laws are enacted, social issues come to the forefront, and security requirements mature. Traditional decision support systems (DSS) are incapable of readily incorporating localised variables into decision-making processes and must be enhanced. Geographic Information Systems (GIS), have the potential to enhance traditional management decision-making (DSS) tools by adapting them for use in global environments. This paper proposes the melding of GIS and DSS toolsets to create a new framework, hereinafter referred to as Geographically-Enhanced Decision Support Systems (GEDSS), for enhanced management and decision-making for businesses.

A. James Wynne; Harry L. Reif; Chandrashekar D. Challa

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

335

Lab announces security changes  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Lab announces security changes Lab announces security changes The Laboratory is implementing several changes to its security procedures as the result of a recent security...

336

Security Specialist  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A successful candidate in this position will serve as a Security Specialist with responsibility as the performance monitor for protective force operations conducts line management oversight of the...

337

Global Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

nonpartisan organization with a mission to strengthen global security by reducing the risk of use and preventing the spread of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons and to...

338

Global security  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Patrick Lynch helps technical staff, academic leaders and governments around the world improve the safety and security of their nuclear power programs.

Lynch, Patrick

2014-07-14T23:59:59.000Z

339

Cyber Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Cyber Security Previous cybersecurity evaluations and designs were often dependent upon personal experience and limited empirical evidence. An LDRD project focused on cybersecurity...

340

Global security  

ScienceCinema (OSTI)

Patrick Lynch helps technical staff, academic leaders and governments around the world improve the safety and security of their nuclear power programs.

Lynch, Patrick

2014-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Infrastructure Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

to enhance the nation's security and prosperity through sustainable, transformative approaches to our most challenging energy, climate, and infrastructure problems. vision...

342

Transportation Security  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Preliminary Draft - For Review Only 1 Transportation Security Draft Annotated Bibliography Review July 2007 Preliminary Draft - For Review Only 2 Work Plan Task * TEC STG Work...

343

Summary of Decisions - September 15, 2014 - September 19, 2014...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

5, 2014 - September 19, 2014 Summary of Decisions - September 15, 2014 - September 19, 2014 September 19, 2014 - 9:36am Addthis Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) On September...

344

Summary of Decisions - November 2, 2014 - November 7, 2014 |...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

November 2, 2014 - November 7, 2014 Summary of Decisions - November 2, 2014 - November 7, 2014 November 7, 2014 - 1:21pm Addthis Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) On November 6,...

345

Summary of Decisions- July 7, 2014 July 11, 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On July 11, 2014, an OHA Administrative Judge issued a decision finding that the DOE should not restore an individuals security clearance. The case involved allegations that the individual had...

346

Summary of Decisions - March 24, 2014 - March 28, 2014 | Department...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

March 28, 2014 March 28, 2014 - 1:13pm Addthis Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) On March 24, 2014, an Administrative Judge issued a decision in which he concluded that an...

347

Summary of Decisions - December 10, 2012 - December 14, 2012 | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary of Decisions - December 10, 2012 - December 14, 2012 Summary of Decisions - December 10, 2012 - December 14, 2012 Summary of Decisions - December 10, 2012 - December 14, 2012 December 14, 2012 - 2:29pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On December 13, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be granted. A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about the individual's alcohol use. A DOE psychiatrist examined the individual and concluded that the individual suffers from Alcohol Dependence. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to

348

VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel Holsinger, Complainant, v. K-Ray Security, Inc. VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel Holsinger, Complainant, v. K-Ray Security, Inc. This is a request for review by K-Ray Security, Inc., the current security operations contractor at DOE's Federal Energy Technology Center ("FETC"), of the Decision of the Office of Hearings and Appeals ("OHA") on remand from the Deputy Secretary adhering, after an additional evidentiary hearing and an assessment of the equities, to its earlier finding that reinstatement of Complainant Holsinger as a security guard is a necessary and appropriate action to effect full relief, even though it was the prior security contractor, Watkins Security Agency, Inc.,

349

VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel Holsinger, Complainant, v. K-Ray Security, Inc. VWC-0001 and VWC-0002 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel Holsinger, Complainant, v. K-Ray Security, Inc. This is a request for review by K-Ray Security, Inc., the current security operations contractor at DOE's Federal Energy Technology Center ("FETC"), of the Decision of the Office of Hearings and Appeals ("OHA") on remand from the Deputy Secretary adhering, after an additional evidentiary hearing and an assessment of the equities, to its earlier finding that reinstatement of Complainant Holsinger as a security guard is a necessary and appropriate action to effect full relief, even though it was the prior security contractor, Watkins Security Agency, Inc.,

350

Procuring Solar for Federal Facilities | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Implementation - implement the project, dependant on the financing selected. Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers provides an overview for...

351

PSH-13-0127 - In the Matter of Personnel Security | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

the Matter of Personnel Security PSH-13-0127 - In the Matter of Personnel Security On March 31, 2014, an Administrative Judge issued a decision in which he concluded that an...

352

PSH-14-0071 - In the Matter of Personnel Security | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

71 - In the Matter of Personnel Security PSH-14-0071 - In the Matter of Personnel Security On October 10, 2014, an OHA Administrative Judge issued a decision in which he determined...

353

Energy Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Energy Security Energy Security Energy Security LANL's mission is to develop and apply science and technology to ensure the safety, security, and effectiveness of the U.S. nuclear deterrent; reduce global threats; and solve other emerging national security and energy challenges. April 12, 2012 A closed photobioreactor system is essentially a series of plastic or glass containers for water and algae. A closed photobioreactor system is essentially a series of plastic or glass containers for water and algae. Proponents of such bioreactors (compared to open ponds) say the growth environment can be more easily controlled; they prevent evaporation; and light penetrates through all sides of the container, which increases cell density. However, bioreactors suffer high materials and energy costs as well as mixing and gas-exchange

354

LANL Plutonium-Processing Facilities National Security  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of technical capabilities. These capabilities form a center of excellence for actinide science and technology, dismantlement, and materi- als management. Among other things, these efforts support requests for power sources acceptability. Plutonium experiments at TA-55 support the nation's stockpile assessment, without the need

355

Contained Firing Facility | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Related Topics Maintaining the Stockpile stockpile stewardship R&D llnl Related News SOLAR POWER PURCHASE FOR DOE LABORATORIES NNSA's Stockpile Stewardship Program Quarterly...

356

Interfacial and Nanscale Science Facility  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

INSF Overview INSF Overview Section 2-5-1 Interfacial and Nanoscale Science Facility The Interfacial & Nanoscale Science (I&NS) Facility is a world-class resource for scientific expertise and instrumentation focused on the study of interfacial phenomena and nanoscience and technology. This section summarizes the capabilities available in the I&NS Facility, along with research programs associated with facility users. Activities in the I&NS Facility address national needs in environmental restoration, waste management, pollution prevention, energy, and national security through research that specializes in preparation, characterization, interactions, and reactivity of interfaces and nanoscale materials. The range of scientific expertise and instrumentation within the I&NS Facility provides a unique envi-

357

TA-55: LANL Plutonium-Processing Facilities  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

TA-55: LANL Plutonium-Processing Facilities TA-55: LANL Plutonium-Processing Facilities TA-55: LANL Plutonium-Processing Facilities TA-55 supports a wide range of national security programs that involve stockpile stewardship, plutonium processing, nuclear materials stabilization, materials disposition, nuclear forensics, nuclear counter-terrorism, and nuclear energy. ...the only fully operational, full capability plutonium facility in the nation. National Security At the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), virtually all plutonium operations occur within the Plutonium Facility at Technical Area 55 (TA-55). TA-55 is the nation's most modern plutonium science and manufacturing facility, and it is the only fully operational, full capability plutonium facility in the nation. Thus, TA-55 supports a wide

358

Documents: Portsmouth DUF6 Conversion Facility Final EIS and ROD  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Portsmouth DUF6 Final EIS Portsmouth DUF6 Final EIS Search Documents: Search PDF Documents View a list of all documents Portsmouth DUF6 Conversion Facility Final EIS and Record of Decision Full text of the Record of Decision and Final Environmental Impact Statement for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Portsmouth, Ohio, Site. The full text of the Record of Decision and Portsmouth DUF6 Conversion Facility Final EIS and ROD is available for downloading or browsing in Adobe Acrobat PDF format through the links below. Record of Decision PDF Icon Portsmouth DUF6 Conversion Facility: Record of Decision 3.8 MB details PDF Icon Portsmouth DUF6 Conversion Facility: Record of Decision: As Published in the Federal Register 82 KB details

359

defense nuclear security | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

nuclear security | National Nuclear Security Administration People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response...

360

nuclear security | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

security | National Nuclear Security Administration People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Record of Decision (ROD) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 19, 2008 December 19, 2008 EIS-0236: Record of Decision Complex Transformation --Tritium Research and Development, Flight Test Operations, and Major Environmental Test Facilities December 19, 2008 EIS-0236: Record of Decision Complex Transformation-Operations Involving Plutonium, Uranium, and the Assembly and Disassembly of Nuclear Weapons December 10, 2008 EIS-0283: Amended Record of Decision Surplus Plutonium Disposition: Waste Solidification Building November 17, 2008 EIS-0399: Record of Decision Montana Alberta Tie Ltd. 230-kV Transmission Line Project November 6, 2008 EIS-0312: Record of Decision 2008 Columbia Basin Fish Accords Memorandum of Agreement with the Shoshone-Banock Tribes October 10, 2008 EIS-0369: Record of Decision and Floodplain Statement of Findings

362

Security Sciences Field Lab (SSFL) | ORNL  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Nuclear Science Nuclear Science Research Areas Research Highlights Facilities and Capabilities Educational Outreach Publications and Reports News and Awards Nuclear Science Home | Science & Discovery | Nuclear Science | Facilities and Capabilities SHARE Security Sciences Field Laboratory May 30, 2013 The Security Sciences Field Laboratory (SSFL) is designed to support testing and evaluation of a wide range of intrusion detection, assessment, surveillance, and peripheral physical security equipment including: sensors; cameras; alarm communication and display; power generation; access control; unattended stand-alone, remote communication; unmanned aerial and activated delay systems. At the heart of SSFL is a simulated border region of varied terrain such as open grassy fields, hilly wooded areas, sand

363

Security In Information Systems  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

rights, and they are proposing security policies, security planning, personal data protection laws, etc

Candan, Selçuk

364

ARM - Facility News Article  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

October 15, 2007 [Facility News] October 15, 2007 [Facility News] ARM Joins National Science Foundation Remote Sensing Collaboration Bookmark and Share In September, the ARM Climate Research Facility became an official member of the National Science Foundation's Center for Collaborative Adaptive Sensing of the Atmosphere, or CASA. Initial discussions for partnering began nearly a year ago. After a series of informative visits and presentations, the decision was made to move forward with membership process. The transfer of interagency funds was completed on September 18, 2007, solidifying the partnership. In the meantime, CASA dedicated a significant effort to support the CLASIC field campaign in June 2007 by providing a network of four scanning X-band radars. CASA is a multi-sector partnership among academia, industry, and government

365

EIS-0345: Plymouth Generating Facility Project  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This EIS analyzes BPA's decision to approve Plymouth Energy, L.L.C. proposed 307-megawatt (MW), natural gas-fired, combined cycle power generation facility to interconnect into BPAs regional transmission system.

366

ENERGY SECURITY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

national strategy for national strategy for ENERGY SECURITY recommendations to the nation on reducing u.s. oil dependence september 2008 a project of a project of a national strategy for energy security Recommendations to the Nation on Reducing U.S. Oil Dependence september 2008 Table of Contents 2 Energy Security Leadership Council 3 Statement of Purpose 4 Letter to the President, the Congress, and the American People 7 Outline of Main Body of Report 13 Introduction 21 Policy Recommendations: Summary 33 Part I · Diversify Energy Supplies for the Transportation Sector

367

Transportation Security | ornl.gov  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Transportation Security SHARE Global Threat Reduction Initiative Transportation Security Cooperation Secure Transport Operations (STOP) Box Security of radioactive material while...

368

Secure NEPA Documents | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Secure NEPA Documents Secure NEPA Documents Secure NEPA Documents The Department of Energy (DOE) limits electronic access to certain NEPA documents on this website due to the potential security sensitivity of some information these documents may contain. DOE regrets any inconvenience caused by this decision, which reflects an awareness of the need to protect the public. Requesting Secure NEPA Documents You may request copies of documents by e-mail or by leaving a message on our toll-free information line at 1-800-472-2756. Please provide the following information in your request: Title and Number of Document requested First Name: Last Name: Address: City: State: Zip Code: Organization (If Applicable): E-mail: Phone: List of Secure NEPA Documents April 1, 2007 EIS-0376: Final Environmental Impact Statement

369

Secure NEPA Documents | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Secure NEPA Documents Secure NEPA Documents Secure NEPA Documents The Department of Energy (DOE) limits electronic access to certain NEPA documents on this website due to the potential security sensitivity of some information these documents may contain. DOE regrets any inconvenience caused by this decision, which reflects an awareness of the need to protect the public. Requesting Secure NEPA Documents You may request copies of documents by e-mail or by leaving a message on our toll-free information line at 1-800-472-2756. Please provide the following information in your request: Title and Number of Document requested First Name: Last Name: Address: City: State: Zip Code: Organization (If Applicable): E-mail: Phone: List of Secure NEPA Documents May 1, 1984 EIS-0108: Final Environmental Impact Statement

370

Security Hearing FAQs | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Services » Hearings » Security Hearing FAQs Services » Hearings » Security Hearing FAQs Security Hearing FAQs (1) What is the purpose of the hearing? The purpose of the hearing is to provide you with an opportunity to respond to the DOE's questions concerning your eligibility to hold a security clearance ("security concerns"), as outlined in the Statement of Charges attached to the Notification Letter. During the hearing, you will be able to present evidence to explain, refute or mitigate the derogatory information cited in the Statement of Charges. After the hearing, the Hearing Officer will review the testimonial and documentary evidence in the record, and issue a Decision which contains findings of fact and a determination whether or not to grant or restore your security clearance.

371

Facility Safety  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

Establishes facility safety requirements related to: nuclear safety design, criticality safety, fire protection and natural phenomena hazards mitigation.

1996-10-24T23:59:59.000Z

372

Facility Safety  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

Establishes facility safety requirements related to: nuclear safety design, criticality safety, fire protection and natural phenomena hazards mitigation.

1995-11-16T23:59:59.000Z

373

Certified Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Industrial Leaders: The industrial facilities shown below are among the first to earn certification for Superior Energy Performance (SEP).

374

2011 DOE Safety and Security Enforcement Workshop  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2011 DOE Safety and Security Workshop 2011 DOE Safety and Security Workshop Enforcement Home Registration - CLOSED Agendas Day 1 Agenda and Presentations Day 2 Agenda and Presentations Hotel Information Enforcement Home 2011 DOE Safety and Security Enforcement Workshop Office of Enforcement and Oversight The Office of Health, Safety and Security's (HSS) Office of Enforcement will be hosting its 2011 DOE Safety and Security Enforcement Workshop on the dates and location provided below. When: April 5 - 7, 2011 April 5 and 6 are open to Federal employees and contractors (8 am - 5 pm) April 7 is a half-day session for Federal participants only (8 - 11:30 am) The Energy Facility Contractors Group (EFCOG) Enforcement Coordination Working Group will be holding a meeting on April 7 at the Nevada Support Facility. For more information about that meeting, click here.

375

Personnel Security  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The manual establishes the overall objectives and requirements for the Department of Energy Personnel Security Program. Cancels DOE M 472.1-1B. Canceled by DOE O 472.2.

2005-08-26T23:59:59.000Z

376

Security Rulemaking  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION STAKEHOLDERS FORUM 2 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION STAKEHOLDERS FORUM Knoxville, TN - May 16, 2012 2 NRC Actions Since September 11, 2001 * Interim solution - enhance existing regulations through Security Orders * Objectives of the Orders are enhanced control of material to - Prevent unauthorized access - Prevent malevolent use of material - Mitigate consequences * Orders were issued to NRC licensees that transport: - Spent Nuclear Fuel - IAEA Code of Conduct Category 1 and 2 quantities of radioactive material Security Rulemakings 3 NRC Ongoing Activities * Orders are an interim measure * Long-term approach is to enhance transport security through public rulemaking * Rulemaking process in progress for - SNF Transportation Security - Physical Protection of Category 1 and 2 material (both fixed

377

Contact Us | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

The National Nuclear Security Administration The National Nuclear Security Administration Contact Us Home > Field Offices > Welcome to the Sandia Field Office > Contact Us Contact Us If you have questions about activities at the Sandia Field Office, please contact the SFO Public Affairs Director at (505) 845-5264. Our mailing address is: U. S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, Sandia Field Office, P.O. Box 5400, Albuquerque, NM 87185. Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr General Information About SFO Contact Us Contract Administration & Business Management Emergency Information Facilities & Projects Nuclear Operations Environment, Safety & Health Public Affairs Safeguards & Security Performance and Quality Assurance

378

Personnel Security  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Order establishes requirements for a successful, efficient and cost-effective personnel security program to ensure accurate, timely and equitable determinations of individuals eligibility for access to classified information and fitness for placement or retention in national security positions. Cancels DOE M 470.4-5, DOE N 470.4 and DOE N 470.5. Admin Chg 1, 10-8-13.

2011-07-27T23:59:59.000Z

379

Summary of Decisions - February 4, 2013 - February 8, 2013 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary of Decisions - February 4, 2013 - February 8, 2013 Summary of Decisions - February 4, 2013 - February 8, 2013 Summary of Decisions - February 4, 2013 - February 8, 2013 February 8, 2013 - 8:20am Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On February 4, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance after concerns were raised about his possible falsification of information provided on security questionnaires and past drug use. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, with respect to the

380

Deputy Secretary Decision Affirming VWA-0018 Decision and Order  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Thomas T. Tiller v. Wackenhut Services, Inc.; Washington, D.C. Case No. VWA-0018 Thomas T. Tiller v. Wackenhut Services, Inc.; Washington, D.C. Case No. VWA-0018 Final Decision and Order Issued by the Deputy Secretary of Energy Issued February 2, 1999 * The original of this document contains information which is subject to withholding from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552. Such material has been deleted from this copy and replaced with XXXXXXX's. This is a request for review by complainant Thomas T. Tiller of an Initial Agency Decision, issued by the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA), denying the two reprisal complaints that he filed pursuant to 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the regulation establishing the DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program. Mr. Tiller was employed by Wackenhut Services, Inc. (Wackenhut), a DOE contractor that provides paramilitary security support services at DOE's Savannah River Site in Aiken, South Carolina.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Startup and Restart of Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To establish the requirements for the Department of Energy, including the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), for start up of new nuclear facilities and for the restart of existing nuclear facilities that have been shut down. Cancels DOE 5480.31. Canceled by DOE O 425.1A.

1995-10-26T23:59:59.000Z

382

Startup and Restart of Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To establish the requirements for the Department of Energy, including the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), for start up of new nuclear facilities and for the restart of existing nuclear facilities that have been shut down. Cancels DOE O 425.1A. Canceled by DOE O 425.1C.

2000-12-21T23:59:59.000Z

383

Startup and Restart of Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To establish the requirements for the Department of Energy, including the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), for start up of new nuclear facilities and for the restart of existing nuclear facilities that have been shut down. Cancels DOE O 425.1B. Canceled by DOE O 425.1D

2003-03-13T23:59:59.000Z

384

Permitting of Wind Energy Facilities: A Handbook  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This handbook has been written for individuals and groups involved in evaluating wind projects: decision-makers and agency staff at all levels of government, wind developers, interested parties and the public. Its purpose is to help stakeholders make permitting wind facility decisions in a manner which assures necessary environmental protection and responds to public needs.

NWCC Siting Work Group

2002-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

385

Facilities for Rent UW Campus Facilities for Rent  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

approaches to the study of structure and function. Instrumentation for titration calorimetry or exploiting Science Center TEM facility houses a state of the art Technai T12 transmission electron microscope, land and natural resource management applications, and the use of information for land-use decision-mak

Wisconsin at Madison, University of

386

Amended Record of Decision for the Idaho High-Level Waste (HLW...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Record of Decision for the Idaho High-Level Waste (HLW) and Facilities Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement Amended Record of Decision for the Idaho High-Level Waste...

387

Facility Engineering | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Facility Engineering Facility Engineering Facility Engineering Facility Engineering (FE) programmatic element efforts within EM encompasses real property asset management across the EM complex as well as the transfers of real property to Community Reuse Organizations and other entities for asset revitalization and/or economic development. In addition, FE coordinates, analyzes, and concurs on EM site submission for infrastructure reporting, such as, in the Integrated Facilities and Infrastructure crosscut and the Ten-Year Site Plans. Working in close conjunction with other DOE programs and sites EM's FE efforts assist in the development and implementation of policies, strategies, and programs to address asset revitalization at DOE sites to promote DOE's national goals for clean energy and energy security.

388

PNNL: EDO - Facilities & Equipment  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Facilities & Equipment Facilities & Equipment Facilities Equipment Decades of government investment on and around the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory campus has made PNNL a business-friendly resource for conducting a wide range of research. As a mission-focused organization, we are dedicated to teaming with government agencies, industry and academia to address what we believe are among the nation's most pressing needs in the areas of energy, environment, national security, and fundamental science. But behind these important missions is a wealth of supporting capabilities including incubator space, research laboratories, and user facilities that may be just what your business needs. We invite you to learn more about how we can work with businesses as well as what research laboratories and user facilities are available.

389

Facilities Management | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Operations » Facilities Management Operations » Facilities Management Facilities Management INL is a multiprogram, federally funded research and development center (FFRDC) emphasizing applied engineering to provide solutions for use across the DOE complex, as well as regionally, nationally, and world wide. INL is a multiprogram, federally funded research and development center (FFRDC) emphasizing applied engineering to provide solutions for use across the DOE complex, as well as regionally, nationally, and world wide. Overview The Office of Facilities Management manages programs to maintain and deliver nuclear research facilities and capabilities at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) that are required to help meet the nation's strategic needs in energy and national security. It is part of the Department of

390

Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - August 2012 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August August 2012 Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - August 2012 August 2012 Operational Awareness Oversight of the Nevada National Security Site [HIAR NNSS-2012-08-16] The purpose of this Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) activity was to perform an operational awareness site visit to observe Subcritical Experiment (SCE) activities at the U1a Complex, discuss ongoing activities at the Device Assembly Facility (DAF) and the National Criticality Experiment Research Center (NCERC), and monitor the status of other ongoing site activities at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) operated by National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec). Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - August 2012 More Documents & Publications

391

SCFA lead lab technical assistance at Oak Ridge Y-12 national security complex: Evaluation of treatment and characterization alternatives of mixed waste soil and debris at disposal area remedial action DARA solids storage facility (SSF)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Technical Assistance #136 Oak Ridge Y-12 National SecurityTechnical Assistance #136 Oak Ridge Y-12 National Securitylittle threat (meaning that Oak Ridge does not need to rush

Hazen, Terry

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

392

Summary of Decisions - November 12, 2012 - November 16, 2012 | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary of Decisions - November 12, 2012 - November 16, 2012 Summary of Decisions - November 12, 2012 - November 16, 2012 Summary of Decisions - November 12, 2012 - November 16, 2012 November 16, 2012 - 2:26pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On November 15, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual should be granted authorization access. A Local Security Office denied the individual a security clearance because (1) during the five-year period that the individual attended a university his use of alcohol regularly resulted in his intoxication, including at least 100 instances in which the individual either passed-out or blacked-out and two instances in which law enforcement officers were involved and (2) the individual had been diagnosed with Alcohol-Related

393

PSH-14-0059- In the Matter of Personnel Security  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On September 5, 2014, an OHA Administrative Judge issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual should not be granted access authorization. A Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a...

394

PSH-14-0081- In the Matter of Personnel Security  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On December 1, 2014, an OHA Administrative Judge issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should not restore an individuals DOE access authorization. As security concerns under...

395

OHA Security Cases Archive File | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

is a archive file of our Security decisions, Please download this file to your local computer and use the build in adobe search feature. Individual cases are listed in the...

396

PSH-14-0033- In the Matter of Personnel Security  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On July 3, 2014, an OHA Administrative Judge issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should restore an individuals access authorization. As security concerns under Criterion H of 10...

397

PSH-14-0094- In the Matter of Personnel Security  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On December 31, 2014, an Administrative Judge issued a decision in which he concluded that an individuals security clearance should not be restored. Following the individuals employer receipt of...

398

PSH-14-0053- In the Matter of Personnel Security  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On September 12, 2014, an OHA Administrative Judge issued a Decision finding that the individuals security clearance should be restored after determining that the documentary and testimonial...

399

EVALUATING TRADEOFFS BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW PROTECTIONS AND AGRICULTURAL WATER SECURITY  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

EVALUATING TRADEOFFS BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW PROTECTIONS AND AGRICULTURAL WATER SECURITY T. E Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA ABSTRACT River basin managers responsible for water allocation decisions are increasingly required

Merenlender, Adina

400

PSH-14-0043- In the Matter of Personnel Security  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On September 23, 2014, an OHA Administrative Judge issued a Decision finding that the individuals security clearance should be restored after determining that the documentary and testimonial...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

PSH-14-0092- In the Matter of Personnel Security  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On December 23, 2014, an OHA Administrative Judge issued a decision in which he concluded that an individuals security clearance should be restored. The LSO suspended an individuals access...

402

PSH-14-0014- In the Matter of Personnel Security  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On June 13, 2014, an OHA Administrative Judge issued a decision in which he determined that the DOE should not restore an individuals access authorization. As security concerns under Criteria H,...

403

Tag: security | Y-12 National Security Complex  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

security security Tag: security Displaying 1 - 5 of 5... Category: Security Security Y-12 places the highest priority on maintaining and improving its security posture. More... Category: News Johnson shares perspective on security Rod Johnson, B&W Y-12 deputy general manager of Security, recently discussed the security atmosphere since his arrival last August and what he sees as Y-12's security future. More... Category: News Y-12 to Install New Fence to Reduce Trespassing The National Nuclear Security Administration today announced plans to extend the boundary fence at the Y-12 National Security Complex along Scarboro Road. The new fence is expected to be in place by April 4. More... Category: News New institute promotes nuclear security Y-12 is partnering with the University of Tennessee and others to provide

404

Nuclear Facility Operations | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Facility Operations Facility Operations Nuclear Facility Operations INL is a science-based, applied engineering national laboratory dedicated to meeting the nation's environmental, energy, nuclear technology, and national security needs. INL is a science-based, applied engineering national laboratory dedicated to meeting the nation's environmental, energy, nuclear technology, and national security needs. The Idaho Operations Office oversees these contract activities in accordance with DOE directives. INL is a multi-program laboratory In addition to enabling the Office of Nuclear Energy to develop space power systems and advanced fuel cycle and reactor technologies, INL facilities are used by the National Nuclear Security Administration and other DOE offices, together with other Federal agencies such as the Department of

405

Security Cases | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 12, 2012 March 12, 2012 PSH-11-0008 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On March 12, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a Decision in which she determined that an Individual=s access authorization should not be granted. In reaching this determination, the Hearing Officer found that the Individual had not resolved the security concerns arising from his illegal drug use, alcohol use, and misrepresentations made during the process regarding his eligibility for access authorization. At the hearing, the Individual did not present any evidence to rebut any of the allegations. March 5, 2012 PSH-11-0010 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The Individual is employed by a DOE contractor and has held a DOE access authorization for several years. DOE Exhibit (Ex.) 13 at 2. In June 2011,

406

Energy Security Council  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Energy Security Council Energy Security Council Reliable, secure, sustainable carbon energy solutions for the nation. Contact Albert Migliori (505) 663-5627 Email David Watkins...

407

Documents: Paducah DUF6 Conversion Facility Final EIS and ROD  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Paducah DUF6 Final EIS Paducah DUF6 Final EIS Search Documents: Search PDF Documents View a list of all documents Paducah DUF6 Conversion Facility Final EIS and Record of Decision Full text of the Record of Decision and Final Environmental Impact Statement for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Paducah, Kentucky, Site. The full text of the Record of Decision and Paducah DUF6 Conversion Facility Final EIS and ROD is available for downloading or browsing in Adobe Acrobat PDF format through the links below. You may also order a CD-ROM or paper copy of the Depleted UF6 Conversion Facility EISs by submitting a Final EIS Document Request Form. Record of Decision PDF Icon Paducah DUF6 Conversion Facility: Record of Decision 3.6 MB details

408

Office of Security and Emergency Management  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Office of Security and Emergency Management Office of Security and Emergency Management The Security and Emergency Management page is designed to give newcomers and veterans alike an introduction and refresher about our activities. We hope you will find it useful. Much of this page's contents are oriented to reindustrialization and other managers of new DOE projects and programs. Feel free to contact the designated key personnel for assistance. Access Authorization Branch Using established guidelines and the "whole person concept," we evaluate and adjudicate informaton about those who need clearances which is developed during background investigations. The objective is to render access determinations that are in the best interest of national security. We also provide security education and awareness information, personnel security program support, and visitor control and foreign travel support to the Oak Ridge Office, the Paducah-Portsmouth Project Office, and the Thomas Jefferson National Accerelator Facility.

409

Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - August 2010 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - August Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - August 2010 Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - August 2010 Nevada Critical Experiment Facility Tour and Attendance at the Nuclear Criticality Safety Program The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), participated in the DOE Criticality Safety Support Group's (CSSG) activities in/near Las Vegas, Nevada, including a tour of the Critical Experiment Facility (CEF) located within the Device Assembly Facility (DAF) at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS). These activities support DOE's Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP). Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - August 2010 More Documents & Publications

410

Summary of Decisions - October 22, 2012 - October 26, 2012 | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

22, 2012 - October 26, 2012 22, 2012 - October 26, 2012 Summary of Decisions - October 22, 2012 - October 26, 2012 October 26, 2012 - 11:12am Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On October 25, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance because the individual demonstrated financial irresponsibility through, inter alia, (1) delinquent and collection debts totaling approximately $120,000; (2) unpaid state income taxes in the amount of $800; (3) the repossession of his camping trailer for nonpayment; (4) a series of financings secured by his residence between 1990 and 2004, the proceeds of which were primarily used for consumer purchases and the

411

Summary of Decisions - November 26, 2012 - November 30, 2012 | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

26, 2012 - November 30, 2012 26, 2012 - November 30, 2012 Summary of Decisions - November 26, 2012 - November 30, 2012 November 30, 2012 - 1:32pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On November 26, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance because the individual demonstrated financial irresponsibility through his current delinquent debts and charged off debts, and his inability or unwillingness to live within his means. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, he found that

412

Summary of Decisions - October 22, 2012 - October 26, 2012 | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2, 2012 - October 26, 2012 2, 2012 - October 26, 2012 Summary of Decisions - October 22, 2012 - October 26, 2012 October 26, 2012 - 11:12am Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On October 25, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance because the individual demonstrated financial irresponsibility through, inter alia, (1) delinquent and collection debts totaling approximately $120,000; (2) unpaid state income taxes in the amount of $800; (3) the repossession of his camping trailer for nonpayment; (4) a series of financings secured by his residence between 1990 and 2004, the proceeds of which were primarily used for consumer purchases and the

413

Transportation Security  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

For Review Only 1 Transportation Security Draft Annotated Bibliography Review July 2007 Preliminary Draft - For Review Only 2 Work Plan Task * TEC STG Work Plan, dated 8/2/06, Product #16, stated: "Develop an annotated bibliography of publicly-available documents related to security of radioactive material transportation." * Earlier this year, a preliminary draft annotated bibliography on this topic was developed by T-REX , UNM, to initially address this STG Work Plan Task. Preliminary Draft - For Review Only 3 Considerations in Determining Release of Information * Some "Publicly-available" documents could potentially contain inappropriate information according to standards set by DOE information security policy and DOE Guides. - Such documents would not be freely

414

Message Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Message Message Security Services Overview ECS Audio/Video Conferencing Fasterdata IPv6 Network Network Performance Tools (perfSONAR) ESnet OID Registry PGP Key Service Virtual Circuits (OSCARS) OSCARS Case Study Documentation User Manual FAQ Design Specifications Functional Specifications Notifications Publications Authorization Policy Default Attributes Message Security Clients For Developers Interfaces Links Hardware Requirements DOE Grids Service Transition Contact Us Technical Assistance: 1 800-33-ESnet (Inside the US) 1 800-333-7638 (Inside the US) 1 510-486-7600 (Globally) 1 510-486-7607 (Globally) Report Network Problems: trouble@es.net Provide Web Site Feedback: info@es.net Message Security Overview The OSCARS Web pages and Web Services are run within a Tomcat container which uses SSL connections to encrypt all messages. The OSCARS Web Service

415

Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: A Guide for Federal Decision Makers  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation slides from the May 8, 2012, Fuel Cell Technologies Program webinar, Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers.

416

2000 Records of Decision  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

History Book Records of Decision Tribal Affairs 2000 Records of Decision Fourmile Hill Geothermal Development Project Power Purchase and Transmission Service Agreements -...

417

Information Security  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

Establishes security requirements for the protection and control of information and matter required to be classified or controlled by statutes, regulations, or Department of Energy directives. Section E, Technical Surveillance Countermeasures Program, is Official Use Only. Please contact the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security at 301-903-0292 if your official duties require you to have access to this part of the directive. Cancels: DOE M 471.2-1B, DOE M 471.2-1C, DOE M 471.2-4, and DOE O 471.2A

2007-06-29T23:59:59.000Z

418

Information Security  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Manual establishes security requirements for the protection and control of information and matter required to be classified or controlled by statutes, regulations, or Department of Energy directives. Attachment E, Technical Surveillance Countermeasures Program, is for Official Use Only. Contact the Office of Security and Safety Performance Assurance at 301-903-3653 if your official duties require you to have access to this part of the directive. Cancels: DOE M 471.2-1B, DOE M 471.2-1C, DOE M 471.2-4, and DOE O 471.2A.

2005-08-26T23:59:59.000Z

419

Science Facilities  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Electron Microscopy Lab Ion Beam Materials Lab Matter-Radiation Interactions in Extremes (MaRIE) Proton Radiography Trident Laser Facility LOOK INTO LANL - highlights...

420

Firm leverage decisions: Does industry matter?  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract We use a standard capital structure mode l to investigate the firm leverage decisions of 1620 companies listed in the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) across a span of 13 years (20002012), dividing the sample into mining and other industries (non-mining). We also test for significant differences in leverage decisions between these two groups by applying a dummy variable approach. Our findings show that fundamental differences exist between mining and non-mining companies when making leverage decisions. We find evidence that mining firms are more sensitive to profitability and asset tangibility where neither profitability nor asset tangibility has significant association for non-mining firms. Overall results suggest that industry-type does matter for firms making leverage decisions.

Silvia Z. Islam; Sarod Khandaker

2015-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

SECURITY HANDBOOK 2 UH IT SECURITY HANDBOOK  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Administration · 2-Factor Authentication Administration for PCI compliance · Web Site Security Scanning, please contact security@uh.edu. · Web Site Security Scanning · 2-Factor Authentication Administration

Azevedo, Ricardo

422

Tag: Security | Y-12 National Security Complex  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Search Tags Tag: Security Tag: Security Displaying 1 - 6 of 6... Category: Security Sheltering in Place If you are advised to shelter-in-place by local news or our website,...

423

Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - July 2011 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - July Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - July 2011 Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - July 2011 July 2011 NNSS Operational Readiness Review of the Joint Actinide Shock Physics Experimental Research Facility [HIAR-NNSS-2011-07-28] At the request of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Service Center, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) site lead for the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) participated in the NNSA Operational Readiness Review (ORR) of the Joint Actinide Shock Physics Experimental Research (JASPER) Facility Restart conducted on July 18-27, 2011. Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - July 2011 More Documents & Publications

424

Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - February 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 2011 Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - February 2011 February 2011 Nevada National Security Site Defense Nuclear Facility Safety Board Review [ARPT-NNSS-2011-001] The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), visited the Nevada Site Office (NSO) and the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) from February 14-17, 2011. The purpose of the visit was to observe the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) review and maintain operational awareness of NNSS activities. Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - February 2011 More Documents & Publications Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - July 2011 Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site - August 2010

425

Preliminary Notice of Violation, National Security Technologies, LLC -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

National Security Technologies, National Security Technologies, LLC - NEA-2011-03 Preliminary Notice of Violation, National Security Technologies, LLC - NEA-2011-03 August 11, 2011 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to National Security Technologies, LLC related to Deficiencies in Inspection and Installation of Penetration Fire Seals and Other Components at the Nevada National Security Site The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight has completed its investigation into the facts and circumstances associated with quality assurance (QA) related deficiencies in the inspection and installation of penetration fire seals and other components at the Criticality Experiments Facility (CEF) and the Device Assembly Facility (OAF) at the Nevada National Security Site. The results of

426

Security rethink  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......breaches or heightening the risks. One of my clients...business to the socio-political situation of particular...based on the return on investment in keeping a high standard...times that security risks are at their highest...lay-offs. The return on investment must consider the positive......

Michael Chua

2002-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

427

Personnel Security  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The order establishes requirements that will enable DOE to operate a successful, efficient, cost-effective personnel security program that will ensure accurate, timely and equitable determinations of individuals eligibility for access to classified information and Special Nuclear Material (SNM). Admin Chg 1, 10-8-13.

2011-07-27T23:59:59.000Z

428

Physical Security Systems | National Nuclear Security Administration  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Physical Security Systems | National Nuclear Security Administration Physical Security Systems | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Physical Security Systems Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nuclear Security > Physical Security Systems Physical Security Systems After the 9/11 terrorist attacks, NNSA took steps to protect its critical

429

Physical Security Systems | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Physical Security Systems | National Nuclear Security Administration Physical Security Systems | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Physical Security Systems Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nuclear Security > Physical Security Systems Physical Security Systems After the 9/11 terrorist attacks, NNSA took steps to protect its critical

430

Security Forms | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

NMMSS Information, Reports & Forms Security Forms Security Forms U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Materials Management & Safeguards...

431

The Intersection of National Security and Climate Change  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The Intersection of National Security and Climate Change Informing Decision Makers A Symposium #12;2THE INTERSECTION OF NATIONAL SECURITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE In his May commencement speech to newly commissioned second lieutenants at West Point's grad- uation, President Obama warned that climate change is "a

432

Security Risk Management via Dynamic Games with Learning  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Security Risk Management via Dynamic Games with Learning Praveen Bommannavar Management Science@stanford.edu Abstract--This paper presents a game theoretic and learning approach to security risk management based mathematical rigor. We aim to take a decision-theoretic approach to risk management. By quantitatively

Alpcan, Tansu

433

Command and Control during Security Incidents/Emergencies  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This presentation builds on our response to events that pose, or have the potential to pose, a serious security or law enforcement risk and must be responded to and controlled in a clear a decisive fashion. We will examine some common concepts in the command and control of security-centric events.

Knipper, W. [NSTec

2013-10-16T23:59:59.000Z

434

PSH-12-0076 - Personnel Security Hearing | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 - Personnel Security Hearing 6 - Personnel Security Hearing PSH-12-0076 - Personnel Security Hearing On October 26, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be granted . A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about the individual's falsification and financial irresponsibility. His behavior raised security concerns under Criteria F and L. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, she found that the requisite element of "deliberateness" was met under Criterion F. She further found that

435

Facility Safety  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Order establishes facility and programmatic safety requirements for Department of Energy facilities, which includes nuclear and explosives safety design criteria, fire protection, criticality safety, natural phenomena hazards mitigation, and the System Engineer Program. Cancels DOE O 420.1A. DOE O 420.1B Chg 1 issued 4-19-10.

2005-12-22T23:59:59.000Z

436

Mobile Facility  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Facility Facility AMF Information Science Architecture Baseline Instruments AMF1 AMF2 AMF3 Data Operations AMF Fact Sheet Images Contacts AMF Deployments Hyytiälä, Finland, 2014 Manacapuru, Brazil, 2014 Oliktok Point, Alaska, 2013 Los Angeles, California, to Honolulu, Hawaii, 2012 Cape Cod, Massachusetts, 2012 Gan Island, Maldives, 2011 Ganges Valley, India, 2011 Steamboat Springs, Colorado, 2010 Graciosa Island, Azores, 2009-2010 Shouxian, China, 2008 Black Forest, Germany, 2007 Niamey, Niger, 2006 Point Reyes, California, 2005 Mobile Facilities Pictured here in Gan, the second mobile facility is configured in a standard layout. Pictured here in Gan, the second mobile facility is configured in a standard layout. To explore science questions beyond those addressed by ARM's fixed sites at

437

Facility Energy Management Guidelines and Criteria for Energy and Water Evaluations in Covered Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Guidelines and criteria describe meeting requirements within Section 432 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA 2007), including defining facilities covered by the provision, designating facility energy managers to ensure compliance, and conducting comprehensive energy and water evaluations.

438

Facility Representative of the Year Award  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE YEAR AWARD PROGRAM REPRESENTATIVE OF THE YEAR AWARD PROGRAM OBJECTIVE The Facility Representative Award Program is a special award designed to recognize superior or exemplary service by a Facility Representative over a period of one year. This special award program has been established in accordance with the requirements of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 331.1C, Employee Performance Management and Recognition Program. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE OF THE YEAR AWARD The Facility Representative of the Year Award is determined by a panel representing the Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer and managers from the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), the Office of Environmental Management (EM), the Office of Science (SC), and the Office of Nuclear Energy (NE). The Facility Representative Program Manager in

439

Technologies licensed | Y-12 National Security Complex  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Technologies licensed Technologies licensed Technologies licensed Posted: July 16, 2012 - 3:49pm | Y-12 Report | Volume 9, Issue 1 | 2012 Rendering of Y-12's Access Rate Control System Wherever threatening situations arise, in-place security measures make the most of every second. On Feb. 8, a startup firm in Knoxville, Tenn., licensed two security-related technologies from the Y-12 National Security Complex that do just that. The technologies, which delay entrance to controlled-access areas, provide a security solution for various potential markets: commercial nuclear facilities, pharmaceutical manufacturers, correctional facilities and large sporting venues, as well as for other Department of Energy sites. Sustainable Environment Technologies, LLC (SET), licensed the Access Rate

440

Decision Analysis for EGS  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Decision Analysis for EGS presentation at the April 2013 peer review meeting held in Denver, Colorado.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Decision Theory Mendoza, M.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 MS 1319 Decision Theory Mendoza, M. Dept. Statistics, ITAM Rio Hondo 1, San Angel. México 01000 D of Decision Theory, the literature offers an account of the ways people actually make decisions and a discussion on the mechanisms underlying this behavior. This is called a "descriptive" decision theory

Mendoza Ramírez, Manuel

442

VWA-0005 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel L. Holsinger  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel L. Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel L. Holsinger VWA-0005 - Deputy Secretary Decision - In the Matter of Daniel L. Holsinger This is a request for review by K-Ray Security, Inc., from the Initial Agency Decision by the Office of Hearings and Appeals ("OHA"), finding that reinstatement of Mr. Holsinger as a security guard is a necessary and appropriate action to effect full relief for a retaliatory termination made by the previous security contractor, Watkins Security Agency, Inc., ("WSA"). Based upon my review of the regulatory language, the relevant case law, and the entire record, I conclude that OHA's decision is incorrect. Mr. Holsinger filed a complaint with the Office of Contractor Employee Protection ("OCEP") on October 7, 1994. R. 103-106. He alleged that he had

443

P:\DECISION\1104.tso.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

from from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. § 552. Such material has been deleted from this copy and replaced with XXXXXX's. United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the matter of Personnel Security Hearing ) ) Filing Date: September 1, 2011 ) Case No.: TSO-1104 ) ____________________________________) Issued: December 1, 2011 ______________ Decision and Order _______________ Robert B. Palmer, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") for access authorization under the regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, entitled "Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special

444

P:\DECISION\1009.tso.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 9, 2011 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Hearing Officer's Decision Name of Case: Personnel Security Hearing Date of Filing: February 15, 2011 Case Number: TSO-1009 This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1/ under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations, I have determined that the individual's access authorization should not be restored.

445

P:\DECISION\1102.tso.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

United States Department of Energy Office of Hearings and Appeals In the Matter of Personnel Security ) Filing Date: August 26, 2011 ) ) Case No. TSO-1102 ) ____________________________________) Issued: January 12, 2012 __________ Decision and Order __________ Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1/ under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations, I have

446

Modeling behavioral considerations related to information security.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The authors present experimental and simulation results of an outcome-based learning model for the identification of threats to security systems. This model integrates judgment, decision-making, and learning theories to provide a unified framework for the behavioral study of upcoming threats.

Martinez-Moyano, I. J.; Conrad, S. H.; Andersen, D. F. (Decision and Information Sciences); (SNL); (Univ. at Albany)

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

447

Experimental Facilities Division Oak Ridge Nov. 13-15, 2002  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Experimental Facilities Division Oak Ridge Nov. 13-15, 2002 PITTING ISSUE/TARGET DECISION John;Experimental Facilities Division Oak Ridge2 Nov. 13-15, 2002 SNS-XFD Doug Abernathy Michael Agamalian Ian The Pit Crew #12;Experimental Facilities Division Oak Ridge3 Nov. 13-15, 2002 Criteria and Deadlines

McDonald, Kirk

448

Security seal  

DOE Patents [OSTI]

Security for a package or verifying seal in plastic material is provided by a print seal with unique thermally produced imprints in the plastic. If tampering is attempted, the material is irreparably damaged and thus detectable. The pattern of the imprints, similar to "fingerprints" are recorded as a positive identification for the seal, and corresponding recordings made to allow comparison. The integrity of the seal is proved by the comparison of imprint identification records made by laser beam projection.

Gobeli, Garth W. (Albuquerque, NM)

1985-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

449

NNSA Completes Successful Facilities and Infrastructure Recapitalization  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Completes Successful Facilities and Infrastructure Recapitalization Completes Successful Facilities and Infrastructure Recapitalization Program | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > Media Room > Press Releases > NNSA Completes Successful Facilities and Infrastructure Recapitalization Program Press Release NNSA Completes Successful Facilities and Infrastructure Recapitalization

450

Nonproliferation & International Security | National Nuclear Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Nonproliferation & International Security | National Nuclear Security Nonproliferation & International Security | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Nonproliferation & International Security Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nonproliferation > Nonproliferation & International Security Nonproliferation & International Security

451

Nonproliferation & International Security | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Nonproliferation & International Security | National Nuclear Security Nonproliferation & International Security | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Nonproliferation & International Security Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nonproliferation > Nonproliferation & International Security Nonproliferation & International Security

452

Securing Infrastructure from High Explosive Threats  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) is working with the Department of Homeland Security's Science and Technology Directorate, the Transportation Security Administration, and several infrastructure partners to characterize and help mitigate principal structural vulnerabilities to explosive threats. Given the importance of infrastructure to the nation's security and economy, there is a clear need for applied research and analyses (1) to improve understanding of the vulnerabilities of these systems to explosive threats and (2) to provide decision makers with time-critical technical assistance concerning countermeasure and mitigation options. Fully-coupled high performance calculations of structural response to ideal and non-ideal explosives help bound and quantify specific critical vulnerabilities, and help identify possible corrective schemes. Experimental validation of modeling approaches and methodologies builds confidence in the prediction, while advanced stochastic techniques allow for optimal use of scarce computational resources to efficiently provide infrastructure owners and decision makers with timely analyses.

Glascoe, L; Noble, C; Reynolds, J; Kuhl, A; Morris, J

2009-03-20T23:59:59.000Z

453

Microsoft Word - LLNL Security Clearances Final 121108a _2_.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Security Clearances at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratory-California INS-O-09-01 December 2008 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Inspections and Special Inquiries Inspection Report Department of Energy Washington, DC 2 0 5 8 5 December 11, 2008 MEMORAliDUM FOR ADMINISTRATQR, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION CHIEF HEALTH: SAFETY AbD, SECURITY OFFICER FROM: Christopher R. Sharpley . Deputy hlspector General for investigations and h~spections - , . - " SUBJECT: INFORMATION: inspection Report on "Security Clearances at Lawrence Livemore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratory-California" BACKGROUND Department of Energy facilities, including those managed by the National Nuclear Security

454

Facility Safety  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The objective of this Order is to establish facility safety requirements related to: nuclear safety design, criticality safety, fire protection and natural phenomena hazards mitigation. The Order has Change 1 dated 11-16-95, Change 2 dated 10-24-96, and the latest Change 3 dated 11-22-00 incorporated. The latest change satisfies a commitment made to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) in response to DNFSB recommendation 97-2, Criticality Safety.

2000-11-20T23:59:59.000Z

455

Facility Safety  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The order establishes facility and programmatic safety requirements for nuclear and explosives safety design criteria, fire protection, criticality safety, natural phenomena hazards (NPH) mitigation, and the System Engineer Program.Chg 1 incorporates the use of DOE-STD-1189-2008, Integration of Safety into the Design Process, mandatory for Hazard Category 1, 2 and 3 nuclear facilities. Cancels DOE O 420.1A.

2005-12-22T23:59:59.000Z

456

Facility Safety  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

DOE-STD-1104 contains the Department's method and criteria for reviewing and approving nuclear facility's documented safety analysis (DSA). This review and approval formally document the basis for DOE, concluding that a facility can be operated safely in a manner that adequately protects workers, the public, and the environment. Therefore, it is appropriate to formally require implementation of the review methodology and criteria contained in DOE-STD-1104.

2013-06-21T23:59:59.000Z

457

Information security knowledge sharing inorganizations: Investigating the effect ofbehavioral information security governance andnational culture  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract This paper presents an empirical investigation on what behavioral information security governance factors drives the establishment of information security knowledge sharing in organizations. Data was collected from organizations located in different geographic regions of the world, and the amount of data collected from two countries namely, USA and Sweden allowed us to investigate if the effect of behavioral information security governance factors on the establishment of security knowledge sharing differs based on national culture. The study followed a mixed methods research design, wherein qualitative data was collected to both establish the study's research model and develop a survey instrument that was distributed to 578 information security executives. The results suggest that processes to coordinate implemented security knowledge sharing mechanisms have a major direct influence on the establishment of security knowledge sharing in organizations; the effect of organizational structure (e.g., centralized security function to develop and deploy uniform firm-wide policies, and use of steering committees to facilitate information security planning) is slightly weaker, while business-based information security management has no significant direct effect on security knowledge sharing. A mediation analysis revealed that the reason for the nonsignificant direct relation between business-based information security management and security knowledge sharing is the fully mediating effect of coordinating information security processes. Thus, the results disentangles the interrelated influences of behavioral information security governance factors on security knowledge sharing by showing that information security governance sets the platform to establish security knowledge sharing, and coordinating processes realize the effect of both the structure of the information security function and the alignment of information security management with business needs. A multigroup analysis identified that national culture had a significant moderating effect on the association between four of the six proposed relations. In Sweden which is seen as a less individualist, feminine country managers tend to focus their efforts on implementing controls that are aligned with business activities and employees' need; monitoring the effectiveness of the implemented controls, and assuring that the controls are not too obtrusive to the end-user. On the contrary, US organizations establish security knowledge sharing in their organization through formal arrangements and structures. These results imply that Swedish managers perceive it to be important to involve, or at least know how their employees cope with the decisions that have been made, thus favoring local participation in information security management, while US managers may feel the need to have more central control when running their information security function. The findings suggest that national culture should be taken into consideration in future studies in particular when investigating organizations operating in a global environment and understand how it affects behaviors and decision-making.

Waldo Rocha Flores; Egil Antonsen; Mathias Ekstedt

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

458

Facility Representative Program ID Selects FR of the Year  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Facility Representative Program ID Selects Facility Representative Program ID Selects FR of the Year John Martin DOE-ID Facility Representative John Martin DOE-ID Facility Representative of the Year. John Martin was selected as DOE-ID's Facility Representative of the Year and the office's nominee for the 2007 DOE Facility Representative of the Year Award. John was selected from an exceptional field of candidates to represent DOE-ID at the Facility Representative Annual Workshop in Las Vegas this May. Each year the Department of Energy recognizes the Facility Representative whose achievements during the calendar year are most exemplary. A panel of senior personnel representing the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), Environmental Management (EM), Science (SC), Nuclear Energy (NE) and at least five

459

Using Operational Security (OPSEC) to Support a Cyber Security...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Using Operational Security (OPSEC) to Support a Cyber Security Culture in Control Systems Environments Using Operational Security (OPSEC) to Support a Cyber Security Culture in...

460

Summary of Off-Normal Events in US Fuel Cycle Facilities for AFCI Applications  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report is a collection and review of system operation and failure experiences for facilities comprising the fission reactor fuel cycle, with the exception of reactor operations. This report includes mines, mills, conversion plants, enrichment plants, fuel fabrication plants, transportation of fuel materials between these centers, and waste storage facilities. Some of the facilities discussed are no longer operating; others continue to produce fuel for the commercial fission power plant industry. Some of the facilities discussed have been part of the militarys nuclear effort; these are included when the processes used are similar to those used for commercial nuclear power. When reading compilations of incidents and accidents, after repeated entries it is natural to form an opinion that there exists nothing but accidents. For this reason, production or throughput values are described when available. These adverse operating experiences are compiled to support the design and decisions needed for the Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative (AFCI). The AFCI is to weigh options for a new fission reactor fuel cycle that is efficient, safe, and productive for US energy security.

L. C. Cadwallader; S. J. Piet; S. O. Sheetz; D. H. McGuire; W. B. Boore

2005-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Application of Engineering and Technical Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities Standard Review Plan (SRP)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This Standard Review Plan (SRP), Application of Engineering and Technical Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities, was developed by the Chief of Nuclear Safety (CNS)1, Office of the Under Secretary for Nuclear Security, to help strengthen the technical rigor of line management oversight and federal monitoring of DOE nuclear facilities. This SRP (hereafter refers to as the Engineering SRP) provides consistent review guidance to assure that engineering and technical requirements are appropriately applied for the design, operations and disposition2 of DOE nuclear facilities. It is one of a series of three SRPs developed by the CNS. The other two SRPs address: 1) nuclear safety basis program review; and 2) application of requirements of DOE O 413.3B, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, and DOE-STD-1189, Integration of Safety into the Design Process, for DOE Critical Decision (CD) review and approval. These SRPs may be revised in the future to reflect changes in the DOE requirements, lessons learned, and experience/insights from nuclear facility design, operations, and disposition.

462

Infrastructure Security EXCEPTIONAL SERVICE IN THE NATIONAL INTEREST  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. SAND 2012-0603P National Solar Thermal Test Facility The primary goal if the NSTTF is to provide experimental...

463

Old Dominion University Annual Security and Fire Safety Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Protection Features in Residence Halls____________________ 21 Residential Facilities Fire Safety AmenitiesOld Dominion University 2012 Annual Security and Fire Safety Report All statements and policies _________________________________________ 17 Fire Safety ______________________________________________________________ 19 Residence Halls

464

Transportation Security | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Transportation Security Transportation Security Transportation Security More Documents & Publications Overview for Newcomers West Valley Demonstration Project Low-Level Waste...

465

Summary of Decisions - January 28, 2013 - February 1, 2013 | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8, 2013 - February 1, 2013 8, 2013 - February 1, 2013 Summary of Decisions - January 28, 2013 - February 1, 2013 February 1, 2013 - 1:33pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On February 1, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance after the individual tested positive on a random Breath Alcohol Test (BAT). The individual acknowledged that, since 2009, he would routinely drink to 18 12-ounce beers each weekend and had become intoxicated almost weekly. Subsequent to testing positive on the random BAT, the individual began to abstain from drinking all alcohol and commenced an intensive outpatient alcohol treatment program (IOP). At the

466

Summary of Decisions - November 4, 2013 - November 8, 2013 | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4, 2013 - November 8, 2013 4, 2013 - November 8, 2013 Summary of Decisions - November 4, 2013 - November 8, 2013 November 8, 2013 - 2:57pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On November 5, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. In April 2013, as part of a background investigation, the local security office (LSO) conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address concerns about his alcohol use. During that PSI, the individual was referred to a DOE consultant psychologist (DOE psychologist) for an agency-sponsored evaluation who concluded that the individual suffers from Alcohol Dependence. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer

467

Summary of Decisions - January 28, 2013 - February 1, 2013 | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8, 2013 - February 1, 2013 8, 2013 - February 1, 2013 Summary of Decisions - January 28, 2013 - February 1, 2013 February 1, 2013 - 1:33pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On February 1, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance after the individual tested positive on a random Breath Alcohol Test (BAT). The individual acknowledged that, since 2009, he would routinely drink to 18 12-ounce beers each weekend and had become intoxicated almost weekly. Subsequent to testing positive on the random BAT, the individual began to abstain from drinking all alcohol and commenced an intensive outpatient alcohol treatment program (IOP). At the

468

Summary of Decisions - February 4, 2013 - February 8, 2013 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4, 2013 - February 8, 2013 4, 2013 - February 8, 2013 Summary of Decisions - February 4, 2013 - February 8, 2013 February 8, 2013 - 8:20am Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On February 4, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance after concerns were raised about his possible falsification of information provided on security questionnaires and past drug use. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had presented sufficient evidence to resolve these security concerns. Specifically, with respect to the individual's omissions on security forms, she found that the requisite

469

PROJECT MANGEMENT PLAN EXAMPLES Policy & Operational Decisions, Assumptions  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Policy & Operational Decisions, Assumptions Policy & Operational Decisions, Assumptions and Strategies Examples 1 & 2 Example 1 1.0 Summary The 322-M Metallurgical Laboratory is currently categorized as a Radiological Facility. It is inactive with no future DOE mission. In May of 1998 it was ranked Number 45 in the Inactive Facilities Risk Ranking database which the Facilities Decommissioning Division maintains. A short-term surveillance and maintenance program is in-place while the facility awaits final deactivation. Completion of the end points described in this deactivation project plan will place the 322-M facility into an End State that can be described as "cold and dark". The facility will be made passively safe requiring minimal surveillance and no scheduled maintenance.

470

Independent Oversight Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex - May 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex - Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex - May 2013 Independent Oversight Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex - May 2013 May 2013 Appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility Safety Basis Preliminary Safety Design Report Process at the Y-12 National Security Complex The Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), conducted an appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility (UPF) Preliminary Safety Design Report (PSDR) and associated site office review processes. This appraisal focused on selected aspects of the PSDR submitted to the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Production Office (NPO) for review

471

Independent Oversight Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex - May 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex - Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex - May 2013 Independent Oversight Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex - May 2013 May 2013 Appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility Safety Basis Preliminary Safety Design Report Process at the Y-12 National Security Complex The Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), conducted an appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility (UPF) Preliminary Safety Design Report (PSDR) and associated site office review processes. This appraisal focused on selected aspects of the PSDR submitted to the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Production Office (NPO) for review

472

Border Security | ornl.gov  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Border Security SHARE Border Security Testing of unmanned aerial surveillance equipment. ORNL performs border security research at the Security Sciences Field Laboratory (SSFL),...

473

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site Tritium Facilities -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Tritium Tritium Facilities - December 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site Tritium Facilities - December 2012 December 2012 Review of Site Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Savannah River Site Tritium Facilities The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of preparedness for severe natural phenomena events (NPEs) at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Savannah River Site's (SRS's) Tritium Facilities (TF). The HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations performed this review to evaluate the processes for identifying emergency response capabilities and maintaining them in a state of readiness in case of a severe NPE.

474

Information Security | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Information Security | National Nuclear Security Administration Information Security | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Information Security Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nuclear Security > Information Security Information Security Information security deals with requirements for the protection and control of information and matter required to be classified or controlled by

475

Security for grids  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Securing a Grid environment presents a distinctive set of challenges. This paper groups the activities that need to be secured into four categories: naming and authentication; secure communication; trust, policy, and authorization; and enforcement of access control. It examines the current state of the art in securing these processes and introduces new technologies that promise to meet the security requirements of Grids more completely.

Humphrey, Marty; Thompson, Mary R.; Jackson, Keith R.

2005-08-14T23:59:59.000Z

476

P:\DECISION\psh-12-0117.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 10, 2012 ) September 10, 2012 ) Case No.: PSH-12-0117 ) ____________________________________) Issued: March 1, 2013 ______________ Decision and Order _______________ Robert B. Palmer, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") for access authorization under the regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, entitled "Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." 1 For the reasons set forth below, I conclude that the individual's security clearance should not be restored at this time. 2 I. BACKGROUND The individual is employed by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor, and was granted a security

477

P:\DECISION\psh-11-0027.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

) ) Case No.: PSH-11-0027 ) ____________________________________) Issued: April 6, 2012 ______________ Decision and Order _______________ Robert B. Palmer, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") for access authorization under the regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, entitled "Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." 1 For the reasons set forth below, I conclude that the individual's security clearance should not be restored at this time. 2 I. BACKGROUND The individual is employed by a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor, and was granted a security

478

P:\DECISION\psh-12-0059.wpd  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Security Security ) Filing Date: May 16, 2012 ) ) Case No. PSH-12-0059 ) ____________________________________) Issued: September 13, 2012 __________ Hearing Officer Decision __________ Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman, Hearing Officer: This Decision concerns the eligibility of XXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as "the individual") to hold an access authorization 1/ under the Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 710, Subpart A, entitled, "General Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material." As discussed below, after carefully considering the record before me in light of the relevant regulations, I have determined that the individual's access authorization should not be granted.

479

EIS-0082: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

: Record of Decision : Record of Decision EIS-0082: Record of Decision Defense Waste Processing Facility at the Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is publishing a Record of Decision for the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF). DOE has prepared and issued a Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) (DOE/EIS-0082-S, November 25, 1994) to assess the potential environmental impacts of completing construction and operating the DWPF, a group of associated facilities and structures, to pretreat, immobilize, and store high-level radioactive waste at the Savannah River Site (SRS). On the basis of the analysis of impacts in the Supplemental EIS, monetary costs, and regulatory commitments, DOE has decided to complete construction and

480

EIS-0385: Record of Decision and Floodplain Statement of Findings |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Record of Decision and Floodplain Statement of Findings Record of Decision and Floodplain Statement of Findings EIS-0385: Record of Decision and Floodplain Statement of Findings Site Selection for the Expansion of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve DOE has prepared an environmental impact statement (EIS) (DOE/EIS-0385), DOE has decided to develop a new 160 MMB SPR storage facility at Richton (Mississippi), expand the storage capacity at the existing Bayou Choctaw (Louisiana) SPR facility by 33 MMB, expand the storage capacity at the existing Big Hill (Texas) SPR facility by 80 MMB, and fill the Reserve to 1 billion barrels of oil as authorized by Congress.(72 FR 7964) Record of Decision and Floodplain Statement of Findings: Site Selection for the Expansion of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, EIS-0385 (February 2007)

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "facility security decision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

EIS-0221: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1: Record of Decision 1: Record of Decision EIS-0221: Record of Decision York County Energy Partners Cogeneration Facility of the Clean Coal Technology Demonstration Program in North Codorus Township, York County, Pennsylvania The Department of Energy (the Department) has prepared an Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/ EIS-0221) to assess the environmental and human health impacts associated with construction and operation of the York County Energy Partners, L.P. (YCEP) Cogeneration Facility on a 38- acre (15.4-hectare) parcel in North Codorus Township, York County, PA. DOE/EIS-0221, Record of Decision: York County Energy Partners Cogeneration Facility of the Clean Coal Technology Demonstration Program in North Codorus Township, York County, Pennsylvania, 60 FR 43437 (August 1995)

482

EIS-0082: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

082: Record of Decision 082: Record of Decision EIS-0082: Record of Decision Defense Waste Processing Facility at the Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is publishing a Record of Decision for the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF). DOE has prepared and issued a Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) (DOE/EIS-0082-S, November 25, 1994) to assess the potential environmental impacts of completing construction and operating the DWPF, a group of associated facilities and structures, to pretreat, immobilize, and store high-level radioactive waste at the Savannah River Site (SRS). On the basis of the analysis of impacts in the Supplemental EIS, monetary costs, and regulatory commitments, DOE has decided to complete construction and

483

EIS-0221: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

21: Record of Decision 21: Record of Decision EIS-0221: Record of Decision York County Energy Partners Cogeneration Facility of the Clean Coal Technology Demonstration Program in North Codorus Township, York County, Pennsylvania The Department of Energy (the Department) has prepared an Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/ EIS-0221) to assess the environmental and human health impacts associated with construction and operation of the York County Energy Partners, L.P. (YCEP) Cogeneration Facility on a 38- acre (15.4-hectare) parcel in North Codorus Township, York County, PA. DOE/EIS-0221, Record of Decision: York County Energy Partners Cogeneration Facility of the Clean Coal Technology Demonstration Program in North Codorus Township, York County, Pennsylvania, 60 FR 43437 (August 1995)

484

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Waste Sampling and Characterization Facility- May 2007  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Evaluation of Waste Sampling and Characterization Facility to make the final decision regarding the companys continued participation in DOE-VPP as a Star site.

485

2007 Records of Decision  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

of Decision Tribal Affairs 2007 Records of Decision October 5, 2007 - Klondike III Wind Project Power Purchase ROD (PDF, 14 pages, 136 KB) July 19, 2007 - NEPA Long-Term...

486

UNIT NAME: C-726 Sandblastina Facility REGULATORY STATUS: AOC  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

172 1012,'92 UNIT NAME: C-726 Sandblastina Facility REGULATORY STATUS: AOC LOCATION Inside Security Fence, center "of plant at the interseion of Virginia and lOth street....

487

Analysis and decision document in support of acquisition of steam supply for the Hanford 200 Area  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy (DOE) is now evaluating its facility requirements in support of its cleanup mission at Hanford. One of the early findings is that the 200-Area steam plants, constructed in 1943, will not meet future space heating and process needs. Because the 200 Area will serve as the primary area for waste treatment and long-term storage, a reliable steam supply is a critical element of Hanford operations. This Analysis and Decision Document (ADD) is a preliminary review of the steam supply options available to the DOE. The ADD contains a comprehensive evaluation of the two major acquisition options: line-term versus privatization. It addresses the life-cycle costs associated with each alternative, as well as factors such as contracting requirements and the impact of market, safety, security, and regulatory issues. Specifically, this ADD documents current and future steam requirements for the 200 Area, describes alternatives available to DOE for meeting these requirements, and compares the alternatives across a number of decision criteria, including life-cycle cost. DOE has currently limited the ADD evaluation alternatives to replacing central steam plants rather than expanding the study to include alternative heat sources, such as a distributed network of boilers or heat pumps. Thirteen project alternatives were analyzed in the ADD. One of the alternatives was the rehabilitation of the existing 200-East coal-fired facility. The other twelve alternatives are combinations of (1) coal- or gas-fueled plants, (2) steam-only or cogeneration facilities, (3) primary or secondary cogeneration of electricity, and (4) public or private ownership.

Brown, D.R.; Daellenbach, K.K.; Hendrickson, P.L.; Kavanaugh, D.C.; Reilly, R.W.; Shankle, D.L.; Smith, S.A.; Weakley, S.A.; Williams, T.A. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States); Grant, T.F. [Battelle Human Affairs Research Center, Seattle, WA (United States)

1992-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

488

Emergency Management: Facility Emergency Plan Template  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Laboratory Laboratory Building 219, 274 and 278 SSRL Building Facility Emergency Plan In Case of Emergency 9-911 from a SLAC phone 911 from a non-SLAC phone Then notify SLAC Site Security, Ext. 5555 SLAC Emergency Resources SLAC Site Security 5555 On-site Palo Alto Fire Station Number 7 2776 Conventional and Experimental Facilities 8901 Normal working hours only SLAC Medical Department 2281 Waste Management 2399 Building manager Larry Cadapan Assistant building manager Brian Choi Publication date 02/11/2009 Revision date 02/11/2009 Prepared by Behzad Bozorg-Chami Approved by Larry Cadapan 20 Jun 2007 (updated 30 Jun 2007) SLAC-I-730-0A14J-001-R000 2 of 12 Emergency Management: Facility Emergency Plan Template This facility emergency plan (FEP) contains building-specific emergency information for

489

Record of Decision, Tritium Supply and Recycling Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

63877 63877 Tuesday December 12, 1995 Part VII Department of Energy Record of Decision; Tritium Supply and Recycling Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement; Notice 63878 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 12, 1995 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Record of Decision: Tritium Supply and Recycling Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Record of Decision: Selection of Tritium Supply Technology and Siting of Tritium Supply and Recycling Facilities. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) is issuing this Record of Decision regarding DOE's proposal for Tritium Supply and Recycling Facilities. The Department is making three simultaneous decisions. First, the Department will pursue a dual track on the two most promising tritium supply

490

EIS-0161: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Record of Decision Record of Decision EIS-0161: Record of Decision Tritium Supply and Recycling The Department of Energy (DOE) is issuing this Record of Decision regarding DOE's proposal for Tritium Supply and Recycling Facilities. The Department is making three simultaneous decisions. First, the Department will pursue a dual track on the two most promising tritium supply alternatives: to initiate purchase of an existing commercial reactor (operating or partially complete) or irradiation services with an option to purchase the reactor for conversion to a defense facility; and to design, build, and test critical components of an accelerator system for tritium production. Within a three-year period, the Department would select one of the tracks to serve as the primary source of tritium.

491

Office of Headquarters Personnel Security Operations: Mission and Functions  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Office of Executive Protection Office of Executive Protection Home Sub Offices › HQ Security Officers (HSO) Program › Office of Security Operations › Office of Information Security › Office of Headquarters Personnel › Office of Physical Protection › Office of Security Operations Mission & Functions › Security Operations › HQ Security Operations › HQ Personnel Security Op. › Special Operations HSO Program - 2010 Spotlights - 2009 Spotlights - Spotlights Archives (2008-2007) HSO Contacts Contact Us Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan Security Reference Book HSS Logo Office of Headquarters Personnel Security Operations Reports to the Office of Security Operations Mission and Functions Mission Provide a comprehensive Personnel Security Program for the DOE Headquarters complex. Ensure that DOE classified information, materials, buildings and information systems are safeguarded from compromise by only granting security clearances and building access to trustworthy individuals. This is accomplished through conscientious, just, and thoughtful application of Federal rules and statutes with the goal of ensuring that only individuals whose character, associations, and loyalty do not endanger the common defense are granted access to DOE classified information, materials, buildings and information systems.

492

Defining and Computing a Valued Based Cyber-Security Measure  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In earlier work, we presented a value based measure of cybersecurity that quantifies the security of a system in concrete terms, specifically, in terms of how much each system stakeholder stands to lose (in dollars per hour of operation) as a result of security threats and system vulnerabilities; our metric varies according to the stakes that each stakeholder has in meeting each security requirement. In this paper, we discuss the specification and design of a system that collects, updates, and maintains all the information that pertains to estimating our cybersecurity measure, and offers stakeholders quantitative means to make security-related decisions.

Aissa, Anis Ben [University of Tunis, Belvedere, Tunisia; Abercrombie, Robert K [ORNL; Sheldon, Frederick T [ORNL; Mili, Ali [New Jersey Insitute of Technology

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

493

Designing security into software  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

When people talk about software security, they usually refer to security applications such as antivirus software, firewalls and intrusion detection systems. There is little emphasis on the security in the software itself. ...

Zhang, Chang Tony

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

494

Review: Intranet Security  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......Review Review: Intranet Security Reviewed by John Williamson Intranet Security John Vacca...Advanced Computer Technology and the Law Curtis...that in advanced technology the legal system...Wolverhampton University Intranet Security ?? Intranet......

John Williamson

1998-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

495

EIS-0354: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Record of Decision Record of Decision EIS-0354: Record of Decision Western Area Power Administration Valley Electric Association Interconnection of Ivanpah Energy Center to Mead Substation The Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), prepared an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) evaluating the construction, operation and maintenance of the Ivanpah Energy Center (IEC) power plant and ancillary facilities. The project would provide 500 megawatts (MW) of baseload power to the southern Nevada power grid. Record of Decision for Western Area Power Administration Valley Electric Association Interconnection of Ivanpah Energy Center to Mead Substation (DOE/EIS-0354) 68 FR 66410 (November 2003) More Documents & Publications EIS-0354: Final Environmental Impact Statement

496

Summary of Decisions - October 1, 2012 - October 5, 2012 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary of Decisions - October 1, 2012 - October 5, 2012 Summary of Decisions - October 1, 2012 - October 5, 2012 Summary of Decisions - October 1, 2012 - October 5, 2012 October 5, 2012 - 3:21pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On October 2, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that DOE should not grant an individual an access authorization. A Local Security Office suspended the individual's security clearance because of concerns regarding the individual's use of alcohol and prior criminal activity. After conducting a hearing and evaluating the documentary and testimonial evidence, the Hearing Officer found that the individual had not presented sufficient evidence to mitigate these security concerns. Specifically, he cited the fact that the individual had only recently begun receiving counseling with regard to his

497

National Nuclear Security Administration  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

National Nuclear Security Administration National Nuclear Security Administration Ofice of Secure Transportation mKlK= Box RQMM= ^luquerqueI= kj= UTNUR= ;JAN 03 213 MEMORANDUM FOR GREGORY eK= WOODS GENERAL COUNSEL DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FROM: SUBJECT: JEFFREY P. HARREL ASSIST ANT DEPU FOR SECURE 2013 ANNUAL PLANNING SUMMARY In response to your memorandum of December TI= 2012, the following information is provided for the National Nuclear Security Administration Ofice of Secure

498

Facility Safety  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

Establishes facility safety requirements related to: nuclear safety design, criticality safety, fire protection and natural phenomena hazards mitigation. Cancels DOE 5480.7A, DOE 5480.24, DOE 5480.28 and Division 13 of DOE 6430.1A. Canceled by DOE O 420.1A.

1995-10-13T23:59:59.000Z

499

Facility Safety  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Order establishes facility and programmatic safety requirements for DOE and NNSA for nuclear safety design criteria, fire protection, criticality safety, natural phenomena hazards (NPH) mitigation, and System Engineer Program. Cancels DOE O 420.1B, DOE G 420.1-2 and DOE G 420.1-3.

2012-12-04T23:59:59.000Z

500

Campus Security Camera Issued: April 2009  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Planning and Construction: Shall review camera placement and associated building code-related issues. 3 Unit: Finance & Administration Policy Contact Director of Facilities Management Gary.Bowersock@is.mines locations on the Colorado School of Mines campus. CCTV cameras, also known as security cameras, are utilized